HomeMy WebLinkAbout0147_001MINUTES
COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE
JULY 11, 1989
I. ROLL CAL
The meeting was called to order at 7:32 pm. Present at the meeting were:
Mayor Gerald L. Farley; Trustees Ralph Arthur, Mark Busse, Timothy Corcoran,
Leo Floros, George Van Geem and Theodore Wattenberg. Also present at the
meeting were: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon, Assistant Village Manager
Michael Janonis, Finance Director David Jepson and Assistant Finance Director
Donald Mazza. Also present were three persons from the print media.
11. MINUTES
The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of June 27, 1989 were
accepted and filed.
Ill. CITIZEN TO RE HEARD
There were no citizens wishing to address the Board and the Committee moved
on to the next item of business.
IV. FINANC
,-E CQMMISSIQN gESpOnJUILITIES
Committee members reviewed a memo from Finance Director David Jepson
outlining suggested additional activities which the Finance Commission could
undertake as part of their responsibilities. Currently, the Commission's only real
charge is to assist in the review of the annual Village Budget.
Finance Commission Chairman Richard Bachhuber briefly reviewed with
Committee members some of the items which the Commission would like to get
involved in. Among other things, the Commission would review the Village's
annual Audit and Management Iliter. They would also be involved in reviewing
the Tax Levy needs of the Village as well as review any major Capital
Improvement Program financing. Another area that could benefit from outside
review would be the Village's Risk Management Program. Mr. Bachhuber
indicated that his discussions with other Commission members indicated that all
were eager to undertake these additional responsibilities.
Discussion among Committee members resulted in a consensus supporting the
recommendation to expand the responsibilities of the Finance Commission.
Mr. Jepson indicated he would be meeting with the Commission in the very near
future to set up a tentative schedule for items of discussion.
V. & REDEW AND DL%MSIQN OF 1HE MACT OE ME ILUNQIS SIM
VI. INCOME TAX INCRFASE AND 3NE ILLMIS GASOLINE M
INCREASE
These two Agenda items were combined for discussion because of their
commonality.
Mayor Gerald Farley gave a brief overview of the most recent Illinois State
Legislative session which resulted in a two-year increase in the Illinois State
Income Tax and a permanent increase in the Illinois State Gasoline Tax. As a
result of, these increases, the Village could expect approximately $3.3 million in
additional revenue from the temporary State Income Tax increase and an
estimated annual increase in Motor Fuel Tax Funds of $210,000. Mayor Farley
indicated that these unexpected revenues would give the Village the opportunity
to address other sorely needed Capital Improvement projects which have been
deferred in the past. Specifically, Mayor Farley indicated that he favored a
substantial increase in the Village's Road Maintenance and Reconstruction
Program as well as earmarking some of the money for anticipated repairs to the
Public Safety Building.
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon indicated that staff was looking for direction
from the Board for future expenditures of this money. However, Mr. Dixon did
recommend that an additional block of the Prospect Avenue reconstruction project
be added to this fiscal year so that the program could be completed in the 1990-
1991 fiscal year. The addition of this block would cost approximately $200,000.
Mr. Dixon also suggested that General Fund monies be used in this particular
case so as to avoid some of the cumbersome requirements that accompany the
expenditure of Motor Fuel Tax Funds. Further, Mr. Dixon suggested that an
ambitious Road Maintenance Prograrn be undertaken over the next several years.
Possibly, spending as much as $2 million per year on road improvements within
the Village.
Discussion among Committee members elicited the following comments:
Trustee Ralph Arthur indicated that he had initially favored abating some or all
of this money but after discussion odth the Finance Director realized that the
benefit to the average Mount Prospect homeowner was minimal; i.e., $54 first
year, $58 second year.
-2-
Additionally, abatement would cause severe fluctuations in the Village Tax Rate
over the next several years. It was Trustee Arthur's recommendation that the
money be placed in the Capital Improvement Fund for safe -keeping and that the
Board take its time in deciding which projects should receive priority. He did,
however, mention that he agreed that the Road Program should be given
consideration as well as improvements to the Public Safety Building.
Trustee Theodore Wattenberg indicated that he favored returning all of the money
to the taxpayers. It was his feeling that people on fixed incomes were being hurt
by the recent round of Tax increases. Trustee Wattenberg felt it was the Village's
obligation to relieve that burden in any way that it could.
Mayor Farley indicated that by returning this money and placing the burden on
the Property Tax, the result was more onerous to seniors.
Trustee Timothy Corcoran stated that he did not agree with abating the Tax
money. Rather, he indicated that the Village Board needed to plan and budget
for long-term projects. He felt that prudent expenditure of this money would
result in the long term lowering of the Village Tax Rate.
Trustee Van Geem indicated that the Village has shown fiscal responsibility in the
past and that he expected the Board to follow the same policy in the future. In
the past, the Village undertook only those projects that it could afford. These
extra funds would allow the Village to undertake some of those projects that bad
long been deferred. Trustee Van Geem indicated that he agreed with the
recommendation to finish up Prospect Avenue as soon as possible and that the
rest of the money be placed in reserve pending review of other Village needs.
Trustee Van Geem also encouraged the exploration of some rather innovative
programs such as combining the money with other neighboring communities to
solve more regional problems.
Trustee Mark Busse indicated that he was against abating this money and
indicated that he supported increases in the Street Resurfacing Program and
undertaking necessary work for the Public Safety Building. Trustee Busse
indicated that deferral of some of these major projects would only guarantee that
the costs would be more in the future.
Trustee Leo Floros indicated that he was not totally against Trustee Wattenberg's
suggestion that all or part of the Tax money be abated. Trustee Floros indicated
that, at the very least, the Village should make a commitment to freeze the Tax
Rate at its current level for the next several years as a means of lessening the
burden on Village homeowners. He also wanted to look at the effects that
reassessment of both Elk Grove and Wheeling Townships would have on the
Village's financial position in the coming years.
-3-
After further discussion among Committee members it was the consensus to add
the additional block of Prospect Avenue for reconstruction and place the
remainder of the monies in the Capital Improvement Fund.
Two Village residents appeared before Committee members to indicate that they
felt the Tax burden on Mount Prospect homeowners was becoming excessive. One
homeowner indicated that if the money was to be expended, it should go to things
such as road improvements. The other resident indicated that he favored
abatement of Property Taxes in an amount equal to the extra funding received
from the State Income Tax.
. 1M.M..._rM9 3 TWIT
Finance Director David Jepson presented ,a memorandum to Committee members
outlining the recent increases in the Villages medical insurance costs. 'Mr. Jepson
indicated that the cost increases were in the area of 33%. wile this appeared
to be extreme, the Village still was in a relatively good position compared to
other municipalities.
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon indicated to Committee members that a
;Employee Insurance Review Committee had recently been formed for the purposes
of reviewing medical insurance costs and the services being provided by the
Village's third party administrator. It was his hope that recommendations from
the Committee would identify methods that would help to :contain medical costs
in the future.
General discussion among Committee members indicated their concern over the
rising cost of medical coverage and that they be kept informed of the status of the
situation.
VIII. PEN1 G OF VILLAGE
Mayor Gerald Farley indicated this item had been placed on the Agenda at his
request. Mayor Farley stated that he had received comments from Mount
Prospect residents that they found it difficult to get to Village Hall during regular
business hours to tape care of some of the business they had with the Village.
Specifically, Mayor Farley stated that it was difficult for people to secure Building
Permits for home improvements projects and to purchase certain types of Village
Licenses and pay various fees and bills.
Committee members reviewed a memorandum from Finance Director David
Jepson outlining the costs associated with keeping the Village Hall open on
Tuesday evenings from 5.01 p.m. to 7.30 pm. Mr. Jepson's memo ,pointed out
that keeping the Village Hall. open on each Tuesday evening would result in a
modest additional crest to the Village to keep two employees at Village Hall after
hours. Mr. ,Jepson also stated that he felt this additional service would be utilized
by Mount Prospect residents.
-4-
General discussion among Committee members resulted in a consensus that a six-
month trial period should be established for extra hours on each Tuesday evening
of the month. In addition, Village Hall would remain open on the second
Saturday of each month in conjunction with Saturday morning Coffee with Council
sessions. There was some discussion about having Village Hall open on each
Saturday of the month in addition to Tuesday. However, it was felt that the trial
period should be limited to Tuesday evening openings so that a clear indication
of usage would be obtained.
Staff was directed to set up the mechanics for Tuesday evening openings as well
as to advertise this additional service. Staff was directed to report back to
Committee members at the end of the calendar year.
IX REVIEW OF THE DAEEIC ENFORCEMENT AGgUNM MM CQ
COUNTRY COMMMUNM
Mr. Dixon briefly reviewed with Committee members a request from the Colony
Country Homeowners Association for a renewal of a Traffic Enforcement
Agreement with the Village of Mount Prospect. In the past, the Village has
entered into an Agreement with Colony Country to enforce Village traffic
regulations on the private roadways within this development Mr. Dixon noted
that the only other Traffic Agreement the Village had entered into was with
Randhurst Shopping Center.
After brief discussion among Committee members, it was the consensus to approve
the renewal of the Traffic Enforcement Agreement with Colony Country.
1. Village Manager John Fulton Dixon reported that certain residential roadways
would be closed at the point where they intersect Central Road in conjunction
with the Central Road 'widening project. A letter outlining the schedule of
closings as well as a map was being hand delivered to all of the residents in the
affected area,
2. Mr. Dixon reported that repairs to the Maple Street Commuter Parking Lot
were underway. He anticipated that this work would take approximately two
weeks and that during this period, any residents who were not able to find a legal
parking spot were being given consideration because of this project.
I Mr. Dixon reported that as a result of the Consent Decree with Lexington
Builders and discussions with the Prospect Heights Park District at a past Village
Board meeting, an agreement had been reached with the Prospect Heights Park
District to pay a sum of $100 per dwelling unit constructed in the Lexington
Development. As a result of construction activity, a check for $18,000 was being
sent to the Park District for purposes of improving a parking lot at one of the
District's parks.
-5-
ANY QIM MIM
Trustee Timothy Corcoran asked that the following items be brought before the
Committee of the Whole for discussion:
1. Anti -Graffiti Ordinance
2. Planning and Zoning's In -House Parking Study of the
Downtown Area
3. Consideration that the Village operations become
consumers of recyclableproducts.
XII. ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the Committee of the Whole, the
meeting was adjourned at 9:24 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
MICHAEL E. JANONIS
Assistant Village Manager
MEJ/rcw
-6-
Mt. Prospect Park District
411 South Mople • Mt. Prospect, IL 60056,p (312) 255-5380
July 12, 1989
Mayor Gerald Farley
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mayor Farley:
The Mt. Prospect Park District would like to request a modification of
our Village beverage license to include the sale of liquor for private
parties and special events at the Mt. Prospect Golf Course/Community
Center, 600 S. See-Gwun St., Mt. Prospect. Food service will be re-
quired.
Our current "G" classification permits the general sale of beer and
wine at the Grill. Our present request does not include general sale
of liquor, but only for formally scheduled private parties and park
district events. We have had an increasing number of requests from
residents and community organizations for this service.
The Mt. Prospect Park District Board of Commissioners unanimously voted
to permit liquor service for these purposes at its regular meeting on
June 20, 1989, pending appropriate approval from the Village.
We would also like to request an adjustment in the fees charged the
Park District for beverage licensing. Our present annual fee is
$750.00. A review of the fee arrangements by other park districts
for full liquor licenses with their corresponding municipalities
shows the following:
1. Arlington Heights Park District. Full liquor license (general
service) - all fees waived as a governmental courtesy.
2. Elk Grove Park District. Full liquor license (general service),
five-year renewable - all fees waived as a governmental courtesy.
Serving Portions of Mt. Prospect* Des Plaines *Adington Heights • Elk Grove Village
Mayor Farley
July 12, 1989
Page 2
3. Glenview Park District. Full liquor license (general service) -
special classification: $250.00 annual fee.
4. Wheeling Park District. Full liquor license (general service) -
all fees waived as a governmental courtesy.
As a consideration in this regard, the Mt. Prospect Park District would
appreciate a waiver of the fee for licensing.
Respectfully,
Rosemary Argus
President
Mt. Prospect Park District
Board of Commissioners
RA/ru
13.106 ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR DEALERS -1, 13.106
All SO, for issuanceto park districts whm operated as a AUKUM of
li=
not a concession to a third party, which shall authorize the licensft
ofter for sale at retail in the premises specified in such license application,
wine Only, for consumption On the premises. (Ord. 3442, 8-21-94; Ord.
19-86)'
CLASS 'W" license, for issuance to supper clubs, which shall authorize the licensee
to sell and offer for sale at retail, alcoholic liquor for consumption on the premises
where sold, Said premises to have a total floor area of not less than five thousand
five hundred (5,500) square fed. Consumption of alcoholic liquor at or over a bar
is specifically prohibited on said premises. At the minimum, food service such as
hot or cold sandwiches and/or similar food items shall be offered at all times when
alcoholic liquor is served, Drink minimums, such as those requiring patrons of said
supper club to purchase one or more alcoholic beverages as a condition of entrance
to said premises are specifically prohibited. (Ord. 3681, 8-19-86)
CLASS "M" license, for issuance to hotels, motels, motor inns or motor lodges
which shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail, in the premises
specified in such license, alcoholic liquor to guests of such hotel, motel, motor inn
or motor lodge in the rooms occupied by such guests on such premises, If a restaurant
and/or lounge is operated on the premises of the licensee, the licensee may also sell
alcoholic beverages to patrons of the restaurant under such terms and conditions
as may be determined by the Local Liquor Control Commissioner. (Ord. 3337, 6-7-83;
Ord. 3681, 8-19-86)
CLASS 'T" license, which shall authorize the licensee to sell and offer for sale at
retail, in the Premises specified for such license, wine and beer in the original package
which riay be refrigerated or nonreffigerated. Consumption of wine and/or beer
(as w�.-, s=.-)Hngs thereof) upon the licensed premises is strictly prohibited. (Ord.
3075, 12-16-80; Ord. 3681, 8-19-86)
CLASS "R " license, for issuance to restaurants, which shall authorize the licensee
to sell and offer for sale at retail, alcoholic liquor for consumption on the premises
where sold, Consumption of alcoholic liquor at or over a bar is specifically prohibited
and any consumption of alcoholic beverages shall be limited to those patrons who
are dining in such restaurant, (Ord. 3075, 12-16-80; Ord. 3681, 8-19-86))
CLASS "S" license, for issuance to restaurants maintaining a separate lounge area
as an incidental and accessory use, which shall authorize the ficensee to sell and offer
for sale at retail, in the restaurant portion of the premises specified in such license,
alcoholic liquor for consumption on said premises only with meals, and in the lounge
portion of the premises specified in such license, alcoholic liquor for consumption
on said prqnises, with or without the service of food. The premises licensed herein
shall be primarily devoted to the preparation, cooking and serving of meals and
the lounge area shall contain less than twenty five percent (2501o) of the floor area
of the premises and shall not be divided into two (2) or more locations within said
premises. Full food service including dinner and/or luncheon menus, shall be offered
at all times while alcoholic liquor is served. (Ord. 3189, 3-2-82; Ord. 3681, 8-19-86)
K-10
Village of IV unt Prospect
Mount ` t'UUnais —
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Page I of 5 pages
FROM: KAREN GUTHRIE GIET. Ci.bLE TELEVISION ADMINISTRATOR
DATE: JULY 3, 1'J69
RE: TELEVISED Z6A MEETINGS
The Z8A has a regularly scheduled meeting once a month on Thursday evening
at 8:00 P.N. Due to a sporadic heavier work load, additional meetings are
scheduled so that the yearly total may equal 20 or more meetinys. The
average running time of the meeting is two hours.
The Z8& meeting starts a half hour later than the Village Board meetings.
This half hour difference presents a situation in which viewers must remember
two distinct times for Village televised meetings, and creates two and a half
hours of "dead time" for the volunteer crew and staff.
RECOMMENDATION: Change the starting time of the ZBA to 7:30 P.M. to make it
conform with the Village Board meetings. The change in time will (l) reduce
personnel costs, (2) make it easier to secure resident "volunteers" for crew,
and (3) will provide an easy to remember viewing schedule for residents.
CURRE14T STAFFING
The current staffing for the Cable Television Division is a full time Cable
Television Administrator, a part-time Secretary (28 Krs), a Production Assistant
(Career Intern) (35 hrs)° and interns in television and public relations.
1988 was the first year that the Division kept a Production Assistant for more
than three months. The main reason for the rapid turnover in Production Assist-
ants has been the lack of benefits coupled with a full-time hourly commitment.
Unless this position is changed to a full time position, it should not be considered
as staffing for ZB& meetings'
The Division Secretary is trained the same as the resident volunteers and assists
in productions of the Village Board meetings as well as remote productions.
In 1989, the secretary will be required to complete the public access training
course offered by TCI. If the secretary is used on a regular basis to staff Z8A
meetings, the position would need to be changed to full-time or the commitment to
secretarial duties would need to be lessened.
Hage 2 of 5 pages
The college interns in television and public relations have been diffucult
to secure' The divisions currently pays a $lOO a month transportation stipend
for the television interns, and a $60 a month transportation stipend for the
public relations intern' The stipends for both internships need to be sub-
stantially increased in the next budget year. Because of a lack of response,
the interns may not be considered as a crew source for the Z8& meeting'
Resident Volunteer paid $25.00 per session for Village Board Meeting.
PROPOSED STAFFING
ASSISTANT:PRODUCTION Full -Time Exempt Position
The Production Assistant would be changed from a part-time internship to a
full-time position. The suggested salary would be $19,000 plus benefits.
This would be an increase of $4,000 in salary plus a $4,524 dollar increase
in benefits over those already given,
The Production Assistant would work Monday through Friday from 8:30 A.M. until
5:00 P.M. The Production Assistant would be responsible for covering the Village
Board meetings except in those weeks when the Z8A was in session, then the ZBA
would be the assignment' In those weeks, when other production commitments add to
personnel hours, the hours would be adjusted to keep as close as possible to the
37'5 hour commitment. Additional hours incurred for productions beyond the
37.5 hour would be compensated with equal time off'
Production Assistant:
Salary: $19,001 (lO year projected range 19,000 - 30^000)
Position: Exempt, per test under FL5A
Hours: 8:30 - S:OO P.M. Monday - Friday
/:00 until end of Village Board meeting - Tuesday �
7:00 until end of Z8A meeting - Thursday
Additional hours would be compensated with equal time off.
Resident Volunteers: Two resident volunteers would be needed at each meeting.
Volunteers are paid $25.00 per meeting. The increase would be between $600 and
$1°000 per year for the increase in volunteers plus the additional training time
for classes conducted by staff. Three training classes a year would be needed to
maintain a base of volunteers. The Staff time for training classes would be comp-
ensated in time off rather than dollars.
PART-TIME TELEVISION PRODUCER
Salary: $6.00 per (lO year projected range $5.00 to $8'00 per hour)
Position: Exempt, per test under FLSA
No Benefits, No more than 1,008 hours per year.
-,Page 3 of 5 pages
Part-time Television Producer: A television producerwould be hired to work 20
hours per week at $5.00 per hour for not more than 1000 per year. The part-time
producer would be in the Division one full day for productions and would
replace one resident volunteer at the Village Board and ZBA meeting. For a small
increase of $3,500, the meetings could be covered by two regular staff persons and
one volunteer. This would mean a reduction of training classes for volunteers and
a reduction in volunteer crew dollars of $1,600. A part-time producer would also
assist the Division in the continuing increase of productions and remote shoots
( $10.00 + per person per production
Cable Television Administrator:
The hours for the Cable Television Administrator would remain the same, but
there would be a recognition of an increase in commitment to coverage of various
meetings'
PUBLIC WORKS:
Public Works crews currently break down the Senior Center room for Board meetings.
TheDivision is currently charged approximately $5,000 in Public Works overtime
for this set-up and break -down. To add the ZBA meeting would add approximately
$1,500 in overtime to the Cable budget for Public Works overtime.
With the removal of the court space at the Public Safety Building, the Senior
Center has become the regular meeting place for the Village Board and the ZBA.
The cost for set-up should be returned to the Public Works budget. Although the
cost would not necessarily be changed, it would he appropriate to transfer an
expense that is no longer related specificaly to televising meetings.
There would be an increase in equipment maintenance and replacement,
but believe that the increase in cost for these areas would be minimal.
SUMMATION OF PROPOSED STAFFING
(l) Cable Television Administrator ( Exempt ) 37.5 hours
(2) Production Assistant ( Exempt ) 37'5 hours
Change to a full-time position with a floating schedule of hours. Hours beyond
37.5 would be compensated with equal time off with the approval of the Division
Manager. Salary would be $10,000 plus benefits,
(3) Part-time Television Producer (Exempt) 20 hours
The television producer would be responsible for serving as crew at the Village
Board and ZBA meeting as well as a full day on productions in the Cable Television
Division. This position would eliminate the need for dramatically increasing the
resident volunteers. The cost would be $3^500 ($S.UO per hour)'
(4) Limited Option -Resident Volunteers:
Increase resident Ynlunteers. Cost in dollars would be s600 - $1"000 plus staff
compensation time for additional training classes,
Page 4 of 5 pages
TOTAL ANTICIPATED COST FOR TELEVISING ZBA MEETINGS
Option #1
Production Assistant Salary
$ 4,000 (19,000)
Additional benefits
4,524
Television Producer ( Part -Time )
51080
Benefit costs (FICA)
376
Volunteers
500
Public Works Overtime
( 5,000 )
TOTAL COST TO COVER ZBA PLUS
EXTEND THE PRODUCTION CAPABILITIES
Benefits to Option #1
(l) Continued reliable coverage during illness and vacations (2) ability to
increase programming (3) decrease in
training classes and (4) no need to increase
volunteer staffing. For a minimal amount over the anticipated costs of covering
the ZRA meeting, the Division would
be able to meet the programming goals and
objectives set by the Village Board'
Option #2
Production Assistant Salary
$ 4,000 (lQ^OOO)
Benefits
4,524
Volunteers
11000
Public Works Overtime
TOTAL OPTION #2
$ 4,524
Difference between option #1 and #2
4,876
Funding
(I) Current Franchise Fees Collected are approximately $138,000 per year
(2) Current Approved Budget $II1,810
(3) $26,190 difference
9 400 Option #1
T19°7gO
balance remaining in
cable fund
(4) $26,190 difference
4,524 Option #2
$21"665 balance remaining in
cable fund
P ) 5 of S pages
`- —~
SUMMARY'
The Cable Television is currently understaffed. Over the past several years,
the Division has requested a return tma staff of two full-time production
people.To televise the Z8A meetings, a part-time Production Assistant
position needs to be re -constructed to full time. As per previous memos,
having to rely on an intern is a severe production weakness for the Division.
This re -construction is needed regardless of the decision to televise the ZBA.
Option one presents the most benefit and flexibility for the Division' It is
also the first step towards providing support for the proposed l -Net Consortium'
The funding to televise the ZBA meeting is available.
e oiet, C���e zelev���oo ��mzo�sczacuz
JOB DESCRIPTION
TELEVISION PRODUCTION ASSISTANT
(EXEMPT POSITION)
This position is responsible for the production of various television programs
for the Division of Cable Television. The employee shall be known as the Production
Assistant and shall report directly to the Cable Television Administrator. The
employee must be able to work independently. The employee may have other duties
as assigned by the Cable Television Administrator.
The employee shall have a bachelors degree or equivalent experiences in television
pruduction. The employee must be available to work crew assignments for televised
evening Village Board and Commission meetings, and other productions as assigned
by the Cable Television Administrator- The employee will assist in the supervision
of the college interns. The employee shall be responsible for producing a determined
number of programs under the supervision of the Cable Television Administrator,
The employee must be certified by the cable operator instudio and porta-pak
production within six (6) weeks of employment. The employee must have a valid
Illinois drivers license.
Scheduled hours for this position shall be determined by the Cable Television
Administrator.
The salary for *his position shall be This position is paid every
two weeks in ac^jrdunce with the Village payroll schedule.
Benefits are those designated by Village policy for full time personnel.
6/O9 MPCT
TELEVISION PRODUCER (1) PART-TIME
(NON-EXEMPT POSITION)
This position is responsible for the production of various television programs
for the Division of Cable Television. The employee shall be known as
-- e
Administrator.
Television Pruducer and shall repnrt directly to the Cab7e Televisinn
The Television Producer shall be under the supervision of the Television Production
Assistant, —
The employee shall have a bachelors degree or equivalent experience in television
production. The employee must be able to work crew assignments for televised
evening Village Board and Commission meetings; and other productions as assigned
by the Cable Television Administrator. The employee must be able to work
independently.
The employee shall be responsible for zroducing a determined number of television
programs as delineated by the Cable Television Administrator. The employee must
be certified by the local cable company for studio and porta-pak use within six (6)
weeks of employment. The employee may have other duties as assigned by the Cable
Television Administrator. The employee shall have a valid Illinois Driver's license.
The scheduled hours shall be at the direction of the Cable Television Administrator.
The position shall be for twenty hours per week and in no case more than one thousand
(lOOO) hours per year. The position is per deim. There are no benefits for this
position. There are no paid holidays or vacation.
The hours and benefits for this position may be increased of decreased with
two weeks notice.
The salary for this position shall be aid every two weeks
in accordance with the Village salary schedule.
PERMANENT PART-TIME SECRETARIAL
(NON-EXEMPT POSITION)
This position is responsible for the general office duties of the Cable
Television Division. Those duties are as listed: answer phone, type
correspondence, answer resident complaints about cable television, manage
the accounts, television programming playback, limited television production,
scheduling of the conference room, other duties as assigned.
Applicant Qualifications: Must have secretarial experience. Must be able to
work independently. Must be reliable' Must be able to handle confidential
infonnution. Must be able to work with the public over the phone and in person.
Secretary will be required to complete and pass the cable company public access
training class. Secretary will be required to train on limited equipment
housed in the Divisions Television Production Center.
Regularly scheduled hours are to be no more than 28 hours a week. The hours
shall be 8:30 A.M. to 4:30 P.M., Monday thru Thursday. There will be additional
Tuesday evening and Saturday hours as scheduled by the Cable TV Administrator.
There are no paid benefits for this pusitjon. There are no paid holidays or
vacation. There is a two week vacation allowance without pay.
6/89 MPCT
JOB DESCRIPTION
COLLEGE INTERN
The college intern shall be a full- time student registered in a broadcasting
arts program. The student shall be responsible for obtaining all information
and forms from the school so that the internship may be given for credit towards
graduation. Only students seeking credit will be considered for the internship
The intern shall be directly responsible to the Cable Television Administrator.
The intern shall be responsible for television production and limitedg~^^^~i
="""
office duties. The intern shall he responsible for producing one PSA e
15-30 minute program to be determined in conjunction with the Cable Te'=,i='�'on
Administrator. The intern shall work with the Production Assistant incompleting
assignments.
The intern must be knowledgeable in studio and remote shooting The intern should
have a basic knowledge of editing. The intern must be able to work independently.
The intern must be able to work with all levels of business and public contacts `
The intern must be able to adapt to the business environment' '
There will be no offer of employment at the end of the internship. The internship
shall last no longer than one quarter or one semester and in no instance beyond
lOOO hours. The intern will be required to provide 25 hours towards the internship
These hours shall not be limited to in office experience The exact hours of '
employment shall he determined in conjunction with the experience.
Television Administrator.
There are no benefits to this positinn. This position is paid a transportation
stipend ofper month, This shall be paid as determined by the Finance
Department. ------' -
6/89 MPCT
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: July 31, 1989
SUBJECT: Leaf Disposal Charges
For over ten years, we have been hauling our fall harvest of
leaves to an organic farmer in Barrington. We have had an ar-
rangement with this farmer to dump the leaves at no cost to the
Village and, during the summer months, we would relocate the
piles of leaves on his property to make room for the coming
fall's harvest.
As our loads of leaves have been increasing, the farmer has had
difficulty finding places for them before they were decomposed.
Last year, at his request, the Village paid him a flat fee of
$10,000 to dump the leaves. He then purchased a piece of machin-
ery which he is converting into a spreader box to distribute the
leaves evenly over his fields and them plow them under. In his
opinion, this method will reduce handling time and make the
disposal much more efficient. As the farmer, Mr. Ulick, states
in the attached letter, the $10,000 fee we paid last fall was
not enough to complete the construction of a leaf spreading
machine and he estimates that it will cost an additional $5000
to finish that work. He is also requesting $11,000 to purchase
a used loader/tractor for his compost operation; so, overall he
is requesting a flat fee of $16,000 in advance from us to dis-
pose of leaves on his property.
Mr. Ulick is very serious about organic farming and the recy-
cling of leaves and he has been instrumental in getting legisla-
tion drafted which will exempt our type of leaf composting opera-
tion from EPA oversight and permit requirements. Using 1988
fall harvest of leaves, amounting to 3708 cubic yards of compact-
ed leaves, our tipping fees at a licensed landfill would have
been as follows:
Mallard Lake $27,253
Land of Lakes 30,591
A R F Landfill 31,889
Lake Landfill 35,782
Our five-year average for leaf harvest is 4072 compacted yards;
so our disposal costs would have been higher.
In the current budget, I had requested $12,000 for leaf refuse
disposal charges. I request the budget be amended to include an
additional $4000 and that the Village Board authorize a single
payment of $16,000 to Mr. Ulick for this year's tipping charge.
W. -al
I impgolza ism �Ej_j
HLW/td
attach.
THOMAS J. 0-zo<
ROUTE 2 Box 372A
BAnRzweTow, zL' 60010
July 25, 1g89
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
P�tbzic Works Center
11 pine Sreet
In re. Leaf Prc-gram funding
Dear Herb:
Last year we had discussed the equipment and financial needs for
my portion of the mount prospect Leaf Program. z had stated that z
needed approvimatezy $20-22,0o0.on to builu a large 4 wheel drive
spreader and acquire a used crawz*r load*, and, that a tipping fee in
tile amountor$3.00per yard would be sufficient to offset handling
Costs.a�
,"" vise
o me that tile Village did not have enough budgeted to
pay for the equipment last season but that You would try to work
somet h i n g out for this season and we agreed on a flat tipping fee of
*10,000.00 for the 19e8 season (somewhat less than $3.00 per yard).
Sincethe 1988 leaf season I have drafted and lobbied for
legislation (now on the governor's desk awaiting his signature) which
exempts our leaf composting operation from E.P.A. oversight and permit
requirements. z have also acquired materials for and substantially
compzeted a 20 yd. compost spreader. A lack of funds has seriously
delayed progress on the spreader unit' At this time z still do not
have an adequate loader on the farm, however,z have located a 1979
I.H.C. 175 loader which z can buy and put in good operating condition
/or approximately *11,000.o^.
The 19B9 leaf coIlection season is rapidly approaching. And, due
to a Iacx of surficient Cap taz, r have been unable to build arid
acquire the machinery needed to spread existing compost and make space
for the 1989 zeaves. If I am to be prepared to accept leaves this
fall, it is essential that z receive funds from the village within the
next o weeks. The minimum that I need now is sjj°000'oo to pay for the
crawler loader and *5,o00.00 to complete the spreader' (z have already
spent $8,300.00 on the spreader to date).
The machinery z've listed is critical for the proper functioning
o, my portion of our leaf program. We cannot continue to dump compost
in the field with trucks. Finished compost mus* be spread properly and
neither I nor the village presently have appropriate equipment to do
t he job. Improper operation of our leaf composting program can only
result in complaints from my neighbors and ultimately in interference
with or regulation of our program by the z.E-p.A. or others.
My farm based composting activities are an important component of
the mount Prospect Leaf Program. Over the years, z have given freely
or my time and resources to refine and operate the farm portion of the
program, however, z can no longer afford to subsidize the program
financially. If the program is to improv* and continue, adequate
funding is essential. $16,000.00 is needed now ,or equipment. Tile 1989
tipping fees can be deferred until after January 1, 1990. Please let
me xnow as soon as possible when funds will be available so that l can
put a deposit on the crawler loader.
Enclosed is a copy of my previous letter to you dated November g,
Sincerely Yours
~_ THOMAS J. uLzc*.:
ROUTE 2 oox 372A
BARRzwaTow, zL' s0010
November 9, 1988
Mr. Herbert L. weeks
public Works Center
11 Sreet
nt' Prospect, o' 60056
In re, Leaf program needs
Dear Herb:
Our partnership in tile Mount Prospect leaf program has been a
long and beneficial one for both tile village and myself. My soil has
been tremendously improved. Many thousands of yards of leaves have
been divert ed from area landfills. Tile village has saved hundreds of
thousands of doz1ars in tipping fees. Ann most importantly, we have
worxeu together to develop a workable system to salvage, preserve and
utilize a precious agricultural resource.
For me the Ieave program arid organic farming have been a
chaz/enge. when we started our leave program, "experts" were telling
me that one couldn't farm Without using toxic chemical= and that the
onz' way to sozve our solid waste problems was by landfilling arid
incitier at ion. Over tile years, I have spared no effort to prove that
the "experts" were wrong arid that we can meet the needs of our society
without bequeathing environmental, economic and agricultural disaster
to our children and grandchildren. And, even though the farm has been
grossly underfunded, under staffed,anu unue,equipped, /n a small way z
have proved my _-^z°ve gathered a great weazth of informat ion arid
data, tile farm has provided a lot of People with employment and great
food, and we have have recycled many thousands or tons of organic
matter - However, when az, the costs are considered, the farm is not
self supporting. r have had to view tile farm and the leave program as
a personally funded research project. Arid, it is becoming increasingly
difficult for me to personal ly carry the financial burdens of tile
project.
Every year z spend thousands of non—farm earned dollars to
support til~ farm while working untold hours without compensation. my
famizy has endured inadequate housing and is presently living in an
apartment because I haven't been able to afford to complete our house
Funds are riot available to make needed capital improvements on t�e
^
farm. �u, I must devote ever larger portions of my time to non,a,Arid,rezated revenue generating activities.
^'
szn addition, while the village is providing me with more arid more
ass�tamce in terms of man and equipment hours each year, we are
starting to get behind in handling leaves. Both tile village and myself
are feeling tile strain of the increasing demands of operating the
leave program effectively.
There are several factors contributing to inefficiency in the
I, z do not nave adequately sized equipment to economically
handle the present volume of leaves.( my present equip-
ment consists of a 1/3 yd. loader and a 4 yd. spreader)
2- Labor has become very scarce.
3' The volume of leaves we handle each year has increased
dramatically since we began the program.
4. Village equipment is marginally suited for handling
leaves on the farm.
5' Village manpower and equipment is frequently not available
when needed on the farm'
6. Substantial +ime is spent moving men and equipment back
and forth between the village and the farm.
7, Village operators often do not have a full understanding
of my plans, conditions and requirements on the fa,m'
Presence of suitable leave handling equipment on the farm should
achieve the following results:
z' mv compost application time should be reduced by 75%
or more with the same or lower overall operating arid
maintainance costs.
2. Much less hand labor would be required for mulching
o. Having a large loader on the farm would enable me to
utilize Slack time and extra hours to do substantially
all or the work now done on the farm by the village.
*. During the leaf season, instead of waiting for the
village loader to be available, leaves could be piled
and roads arid unloading areas could be maintained by
spending only a few minutes each day thereby providing
better access for village trucks.
5. On occasions when village trucks become stuck there
would be a machine available to immediately extricate
t hem'
S. Leave storage areas could be prepared in a timely manner
having them fully graded,haru and dry when the leave
season begins.
The current legislative and regulatory climate requires that our
�eave program be impeccable if we are to continue to operate. Ill
conceived and poor 1y managed composting programs operated by other
municipalities, waste haulers, etc. will ,esurt in even czoser
scrutiny of our progap in the future. we now have one of the best
zeave composting programs in the state. If we are going to continue
and expand the program we need to make a quantum leap in efficiency.
Acquisition of efficient z^ave handling equipment and additional
funding are essent iaz if z am to operate my portion of the nrogam
effectively
The following is a list of the manimum equipment z feel is
presently eedeu to properly handle leaves on the /arm along with the
appoximate purchase arid construction costs.
2 1/2 - o yd. crawler loader *10,000 - 12,000
zn yd- 4WD spreader mo be farm built') * 8'000 - lo,000
For years z [lave gladly handled leaves for the village without
charge. Now I need the mount Prospect's help. In addition to needing
\
funus to acquire ~~/f icient equipment for `.~)ave handling, z have
reached the point where z need an annual subsidy to assist me in
operating my portion of our leave program. A figure in the range of
$3.00/yaru seems adequate, for now, subject to revision based on
future cost experiece. A village investment in equipment arid funding
now will help insure the health and long term viability of our leave
program.
Many municipalities are spending enormous sums "studying,, their
waste prmzzem. many more are paying ever increasing tipping fees to
landfill lawn wastes (a practice soon to be legislatively nrohiuited)
We are actually doingsomething about the problem and we've been doing
`
it at Surprisingly low cost. Consider what the real savings of the
leave program are to tilaride village now au what they will be /n til=
future. Your generous help can make the difference between a healt�y
^
expand ing program arid possible fa/lure. r look forward to making `,
leave progam one of the finest in the nation. "�'
Sincerely vours,
Thomas J. u\icx
Village of Mount Prospeci6_
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: June 8, 1989
SUBJECT: Elevated Tank Rehabilitation
Recently, we contracted with Dixon Engineering Inc. for a struc-
tural inspection and coating analysis of the exterior and interi-
or of our one -million -gallon elevated water storage tank. In
their report, they concluded that the tower has been well main-
tained, and with continued maintenance, the remaining life could
be an additional 50 years. However, they also state that it
should be noted that the tower has already served a useful life
and that other factors (besides structural capabilities) should
be considered before the owner decides to continue using the
tower. In my opinion, the remaining life of this tank may proba-
bly not exceed 20 additional years. The last time this tank was
cleaned and painted, the contractor was required to do some spot
welding to fill in depressions caused by Pitting action. The
current inspection report indicates additional deterioration to
the steel has been noted.
One very serious area impacted would be the cost of future main-
tenance. Dixon Engineering state that the cost of containment
of any debris from painting operations and dust removal from the
exterior would be very significant and, due to the proximity of
the new condominiums to the east of the tower and considering
the tight working space, they feel this could double the cost of
future maintenance.
The design of the tank that we have is obsolete in today's mar-
ket. The exterior surface area of a million,,gallon tank Such as
ours is approximately 37,000 sq.ft., while the outside surface
area of a million -gallon spheroid tank would only be 20,500
sq.ft. Cleaning and painting a tank is primarily a function of
square footage, and the dollar difference between a tank such as
ours and a newer design would be significant.
Dixon Engineering stated there was some Pitting action on the
interior of the tank, especially on the riser. There are also
some OSHA required safety devices that will have to be in-
stalled. Small, but significant, maintenance items, like adding
a screen around the air vent, also need to be addressed.
Using Dixon Engineering figures and my interpretation of them,
it is projected to cost us approximately $170,000 at this time
to paint the tank.
In their report, they state that special considerations should
be taken when cleaning and painting the exterior. They recom-
mend that the sides of the tank toward the condominiums and
toward the office building/old post office be draped with wind
screens from the upper balcony down to ground level. This would
substantially add to the cost of the painting. They indicated
there is further pitting of the steel, and the interior of the
bowl shows signs of low adhesion, with the coating in the riser
starting to delaminate. They indicated that the ladder going up
the side of the tank does not meet OSHA standards but that
installing a fall prevention device should cover any safety prob-
lems. They also state that the tank balcony is warping, but at
the present time it does not present a structural problem.
The last time this tank was cleaned and painted was in 1982
using an epoxy based paint. Dixon Engineering stated that,
considering the coating is only seven years old, it shows more
deterioration than normal.
In my opinion, this tank is very critical to the operation of
our water system. I would not want to take it out of service
for repairs until at least September 1, 1989. If the decision
is to preserve what we have and not look toward a new tank at a
new location, I would like authorization to secure competitive
quotes from consulting engineers to prepare specifications and
offer inspection services.
Dixon Engineering further state that no work absolutely has to
be completed at this time in order to preserve the structural
integrity of the tank. The exterior will continue to age and
become less pleasing aesthetically, and recoating would still be
necessary in two to three years.
After a careful review and analysis of their report, I believe
their perspective on rehabilitation is limited and not com-
plete. Their recommendations and observations are as follows:
1) Install a permanent, ice -free, cathodic protection system
in the tank's interior. The rin; `.y -,e is recommended in
place of the aluminum rods we have been using.
2) Repaint the tank's interior riser if the exterior is re-
painted.
3) Power wash the tank's exterior and the area of bird drop-
pings plus spot primer over the bare spots.
4) Install a cable type fall prevention device to meet OSHA
standards.
5) Take no action on the tank's ladder until required by OSHA
as it is a very solid, good ladder and the fall prevention
device should cover safety problems.
6) Install a new perforated plate or new screening material on
the roof vent to prevent a possible entry point for birds.
(Work on this already being contracted out.)
7) The balcony has buckled at some connections and slants
downward on the outer edges at one section. This does not
appear to be critical. It does, however, warrant further
observation and subsequent inspections; but no immediate
action is necessary.
8) The bottom sides of the flanges also show bleed -through,
which would indicate that the coating thicknesses were not
sufficient. These surfaces would have to be hand tool
cleaned and spot primed.
9) Recommend application of one full coat of alkyd, followed
by a second coating of silicone alkyd on all exterior sur-
faces and appurtenances.
As I was not in agreement with Dixon Engineering's assessment, I
discussed the situation with a second engineering firm, and we
offer the following comments:
1) The structure and painting system are in relatively fair
condition because of past practices in repairing localized
problem areas.
2) maintenance costs in the future will increase greater than
the inflation rate. This is partly due to its current
location in a congested area. If the repair is conducted
consistent with Dixon's report, we believe it will be neces-
sary to totally sandblast the tank's interior and exterior
and put on a complete new painting system, which includes
two coats on the interior and three coats on the exterior
in the near future.
3) Dixon Engineering's report states that coating on the riser
and bowl shows signs of low adhesion and delamination.
This could be an indication that any minor repair done at
this point will only provide two to three years of effec-
tive coating.
4) No fall prevention system on the existing ladders. We
think it is important to install these devices. However,
it appears that the cost estimate from Dixon Engineering
may be low. If it is determined to abandon this tank, this
item could be deferred.
5) Dixon Engineering stated that the balcony has buckled at
some connections and slants downward on the outer edges of
one section. They state that it does not appear to be
critical at this point but does warrant further observation
and subsequent inspections. I feel that, if this inspec-
tion warranted a negative comment, it should be addressed
due to potential liability. Again, if the tank is to be
replaced, this item could also be deferred.
6) Dixon Engineering's report stated that the tank's roof
sidewall ladder does not meet OSHA requirements. The re-
port states that we should take no action unless required
to do so by OSHA. I feel that, if there is a safety haz-
ard, it should be addressed in a positive manner and correc-
tive action should be taken.
Before any decision is made to rehabilitate the tank, an assess-
ment should be made on this tank for the present and future.
Items that need consideration are:
1) Size of the existing tower, and is it an appropriate func-
tion for 1989 and for the future.
2) Location of the tower. At its present location, will it
provide the level of service that was originally intended
when it was constructed in 1955.
3) An assessment needs to be made of its value since the Vil-
lage has gone to Lake Michigan in lieu of well water sup-
ply. This is a supply issue since our points of supply
have changed location and have decreased.
I would recommend that, prior to any substantial dollars being
spent, serious consideration be given to the above items. While
we may only spend $170,000 for the tower today, it is very appar-
ent that, if the rehab is conducted as Dixon Engineering recom-
mends, within less than five years, potential expenditure may be
an addi,7_ional $250,000 to rehab the tank. This cost includes
complete sandblasting of the interior and exterior and a coating
system consistent with today's design. The impact of the build-
ing nearby and in close proximity of traffic could add anywhere
from 25% to 30% to any sandblasting and painting costs.
Short-term, it may be less expensive for the Village to repaint
and keep the existing tower at its location. However, on long-
term programs, engineers have seen lower 0 & M costs to a munici-
pality if older towers are eliminated and new towers are built
at the right location considering today's new technology with
regard to painting and protection systems. It is also important
to note that aesthetic considerations of water towers are becom-
ing more and more important in today's environment.
Prior engineering reports have stated that an elevated storage
tank is important to the operation of our water distribution
system. When this tank was constructed, its location was near
the center of the community. Last summer's crisis involving a
JAWA outage and the drought clearly reminded us that we needed
that 1,000,000 gallon storage. However, the location could be
changed and provide us with greater control over pressure fluctu-
ations. Of our three JAWA connection points, two of them pretty
much control the centerand north end of the Village. The Busse
Road JAWA connection serves the far south end of the Village, so
a likely location could be near the Public Works building, which
has the added benefit of being one of the highest elevations
within the Village.
$155,000 has been allocated in the current budget for repaint-
ing this tank.
HLW/td
Village of &_zunt prospect _
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO; Michael E. aononia, Assistant Village Manager
FROM; David C. Jepson, Finance Director
-
oxTs' August 4, 1989
SUBJECT: Comparison or Costs for Maintaining and Replacing
the 1 Million Gallon Water ram'
I have reviewed Herb's memo regarding the costs for maintenance and rehabilitation
of the 1 million gallon elevated tank, and I share his concern over the magnitude of
,he couta, When the estimates that are mentioned /n the memo are amJuutnu for
inflation, the total maintenance cuoLa over the next 10 - /Z years could reach
$1,000,000. Additionally, the tank is 34 years old and it seems reasonable to
expect that with." the next 20 years we will be faced with an vuu"r or approxi-
mately $2.5 million for the replacement of the tank. Under txaar circumstances, l
think we should consider the option of replacing the tank at this time rather than
trying to rehabilitate and maintain it.
After auJvatmq m' cati-sted costs for the required screening or the townhouses to
we [ast and using an inflation factor or »n, the expected costs for the next 20
years in 1989 wouaca and as muJuatou for inflation are calculated below:
Costs In Costs Adjusted
19e9 Dollars For Inflation
1989
Maintenance ($170,000 ^ 125%)
$ 212,500
$ 212,500
1994
Rehabilitation ($250,000 x 125m)
312,500
399,000
2001
Maintenance ($170,000 x 125%)
212,500�
381,500�
10 - 12 year Totals
$ 737,500
$ 993,000
2008
Replacement Tank
_1,000,000
_2,527,000�
20 Year Totals
Costs in 1989 dollars are expected to be $1,737,500 and when adjusted for inflation
the costs are expected to be $3,520'000.
Herb has stated that the cost to replace the tank is $1,008,000, and he has men-
tioned that land at the new Public Works Facility is available for u l million
gallon water storage tank. If the $200,000 whim` is convir,g in 1pen would be used
along with $e00,000 from a lo year bond issue to construct a new tank, the 20 year
Michael E. 3anoniu
Page 2
Comparison or Costs for Maintaining and Replacing
the 1 Million Gallon Water ram'
Costs In Costs Adjusted
The total costs over the next 20 r*oro for replacing the tank would be $1,552,800 in
1989 dollars and $1'806,800 in dollars adjusted for inflation. This represents a
savings of $184,700 in 1989 dollars and $1.713,200 in inflation ouJuatod dollars
from the costs associated with maintaining the existing tank and then replacing it
in zo years.
xoumer method of analyzing the difference in 20 year costs between maintaining the
existing tank or replacing it with a new tam' is to compare the present valve of the
cash flows for the two options. If we use the aemo amounts identified above and
discount the actual cash outlays by 7'0' the following values in 1*89 dollars are
obtained:
Maintaining
1989 Dollars
For Inflation
198e
Down Payment
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
1990-
1999 Debt Service
1,112.800
1,112,800
1996
Maintenance
8O,800
112,500
2003
Maintenance
80,000
158,500
2010
Maintenance80
,000
�
223,000�
169,400
ZO Year Totals
$1455=2.1800
$1 806 800
The total costs over the next 20 r*oro for replacing the tank would be $1,552,800 in
1989 dollars and $1'806,800 in dollars adjusted for inflation. This represents a
savings of $184,700 in 1989 dollars and $1.713,200 in inflation ouJuatod dollars
from the costs associated with maintaining the existing tank and then replacing it
in zo years.
xoumer method of analyzing the difference in 20 year costs between maintaining the
existing tank or replacing it with a new tam' is to compare the present valve of the
cash flows for the two options. If we use the aemo amounts identified above and
discount the actual cash outlays by 7'0' the following values in 1*89 dollars are
obtained:
Replacing
Expected Present Value of
Cash !OutlayCash Outlay
1989
Maintaining
the Existing
$ 200,000
1990-
1999 Debt Service
1,112,800
Expected
Present value of
Maintenance
112'500
Cash Outlay
Cash Outlay
1989
Maintenance
$ 212,500
$ 212,500
/9*4
Rehabilitation
399,000
284,500
2001
Maintenance
381,500
169,400
2008
rank Replacement
_2/527,000
698,700
20 Year Totals
$3,ZZO 000
51.100
Replacing
Expected Present Value of
Cash !OutlayCash Outlay
1989
Down Payment
$ 200,000
$ 200,000
1990-
1999 Debt Service
1,112,800
781,600
lv*a
Maintenance
112'500
70,100
2003
Maintenance
158,500
61,500
2010
Maintenance
__2/3J000
53,900
20 Year Totals
Michael E. Jeoonio
Page }
Comparison or Costs for Maintaining and Replacing
the 1 Million Gallon water Tom4
The difference between this type or analysis and the previous comparison is that
actual cash flows are converted to 1989 dollars assuming a 7% time value of money
and a 5% inflation factor. In theory, if we take the present value totals and
invest the proceeds at 7% interest arid if inflation is )m per year over the 20 years
the funds generated will be sufficient to make the required payments.
The present value analysis shows a a*,mge or $198,000 or approximately 15m by
replacing the tank now rather than maintaining the existing tank and replacing it in
cO yoacs.
Bum of the above *noapoeo show that it would be more economical to replace the tank
than to try to maintain the existing tank and then replacing it 20 years from now,
Another consideration in replacing the tank is that it may help to speed up property
tax increments in the Downtown TIF Diatrict' If this uocuca. it will help the
Village meet existing financing commitments and provide funds for continued develop -
merit.
If a decision is made to replace the tank, z would review the reserves in the Water
Fund and possibly recommend using some or the reserves and borrowing less than the
$800,000 used in the example. In any event this project should not have an adverse
effect on our water rates.
oc4nm
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY pp
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W BUSSE
TIMOTHY J CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS Village of Mount Prospect
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
THEODORE J WATTENSERG
VILLAGE MANAGER 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
JOHN FULTON DIXON
Phone 312 / 392-6000
RK035FM
August 1, 1989
THE AUGUST 7, 1989 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD
HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT BUSINESS. THE
NEXT MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD WILL BE
MONDAY, AUGUST 21, 1989, AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR
TO THIS MEETING.
Flmw«� COMMISSION
Minutes of the Meeting
July 27, 1989
Chairman Richard 8acxhuber called the meeting to order at 7;30 Pm in the
Trustees' Room at Village Hall. Members present included the Cha,cmun. Ano
smilanic, Tom pekrea, Newt Hallman, John wunear, John Engel and Jim Morrison.
Also present were nave Jepson, Finance Director and Don Mazza, Assistant
Finance Director. The meeting began with each member giving a brief descrip-
tion of his background and family. Mr. 8acxnu»oc and Mr. Jepson ~alc"mno each
of the new members and welcomed bad' each of the existing Commission members,
zl Mr. Bachxuber turned to *b. Jepson who gave a brief description or the Commis-
sion's new expanded r^le. The Commission's roll in the most recent past was to
review the Village budget and to report to the Village Board on its recommenda-
tions. The Village Board unanimously agreed that an expanded role would be
beneficial to both staff and the Board.
DI Mr. 8acxh"uor conducted elections where Ann Smilanic was elected Secretary and
Newt Hallman was elected Vice -Chairman.
lv Mr. 9acxxvuer asked Mr. Jepson to discuss the uvtiue and expanded role of the
Commission.
1- Annual Audit and Management Letter The Village's audit is a major
activity covering a period of almost four months. x Comprehensive Annual
Financial Report is prepared and contains e wealth of information on the
just completed fiscal year as well as statistical tables containing un to
ten years of figures. Because of increasing regulations, one sheer size of
the report has grown to over 200 pages. This makes it next to impossible to
cover the material at o Village Board meeting. The Management Letter is a
list or concerns the auditors have discovered in their review of pcvccu"rea
and internal controls along with recommendations for improvement. The
Commission would be able to pinpoint trends and financial c"nuu/o" in
greater depth and then be able to report to the Village everu their
findings in a w"cx more concise and objective manner.
2. le the Commission has been a valuable asset
in the review of the proposed budget, an expanded role such as m formal
review of the actual spending results at the six month time period would be
beneficial to the Commission to gauge the results and provide insight to
the next year budget review.
Mr. Hallman asked what the amount of windfall the increase in the state
income tax would provide and what the Village Board's plans were for
utilizing. Mr, 3epev" replied that the total from the temporary incccuer
would be about $3-3 pillion over the next two years and that the Village
Board had niec"aaeu using the money for capital projects. However, no
specific purpose had been defined to date.
3, Tax Levy The 1989 Tax Lev/ becomes one of the 90-91 Budget's revenue
sources. The levy in adopted in November ou that it can be filed by the
2nd Tuesday in December. The Commission could provide some help in
sounding out the ideas for vcuJvctiooa and neogm,
4^ Capital Improvement ProVram Financing The Finance Commission's exper-
tise could prove invaluable in providing alternate methods of financing all
types of infrastructure and facilities such as the Public Safety Building
and village Hall,
5- Investment Policy The Finance Commission would be helpful in review/ng
the v/uag°'a investment policy which was adopted in 1985.
a- Risk The most volatile or the Village's insurance programs
is medical insurance. A 30% increase is expected for the period of July 1,
1989 to June 30, 1990. The Finance Commission could provide some insight
an long term solutions to the problem.
7. Revenue Sources The Commission could provide help in looking at means
to increasing the Village's revenue bane, The 'temporary hike in State
Income Tax will help in'the immediate future and the increase in Motor Fuel
Tax will provide more dollars for streets and bridges, but the Village
needs to constantly evaluate new mv"ccee to keep ahead of the requests and
needs for Village services. The Real Estate Transfer Tax and the Food and
Beverage Tax in 1987 are two examples of such sources.
A general discussion about the iea"ea presented enoued. After a short discussion, a
meeting ac»euvlr was set. The meetings will take place on the last Thursday evening
or the month at 7,30 p.m. in the Trustees' Room in village Hall. A tentative
schedule for the meetings was presented: �
August -
In"nobnaut Policy
September -
Audit Review
October -
Review or Social Agencies
November -
Budget Review, Tax Levy
December -
Riau management
January -
To Be Announced �
February -
90 - 91 Budget Review�'
March -
90 - 91 Budget Review
The Commission then was briefed on the monthly budget reports of revenue and
expenditures. The Commission will be receiving these each month. Mr. Jopev^
explained the largest or the reports and what some of the things to look for would
Adjournment followed at 10:00 p.m, Mr. 8achhuuor reminded the Commission of the
next meeting on xugva+ Jl, 1989 at 7:30 p.m. '
Resp fully tted
Don Mazza
Assistant Finance Di re4r
Phone 312 / 392-6000
AGENDA
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Special Meeting
Thursday, August 10, 1989
8:00 P. M.
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
ZBA-47-V.82. Edwi a
Muniz, 1004 LingolL
This case was continued from the July 27, 1989 Zoning Board hearing. The applicant is
requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 0.5 foot side yard setback for a
walk/patio area instead of 8 feet required. Also requested is a variation from Section
21.601. to allow a 5' 6" maximum fence height instead of 5 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals will be final with regards to the fence height variation, however, Village Board
action will be required for the side yard variation.
ZBA-50-V-89, Chgrles Wilson, 508 N
--Qrth inview
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.13.1, to allow a 3'-4" side yard
setback from the detached garage instead of 5 feet normally required. Also requested is
a variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow 54% impervious lot surface coverage instead
of 45% maximum. The Zoning Board of Appeals will be final for both requests.
ZBA-41-V-89, r, & Mrs. -5 orske/Alroom. Inc.. 128 South Waverly
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a 3'-6" side yard
instead of 6.5 feet in order to expand the attached garage. Village Board action,"411 be
required for this request.
Resolutions
ZBA-46-V-89, Vicki Larson, 1901 Hopi Lane
In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen (15) day period is
provided for anyone wishing to appeal their decision. No permit will be issued until this
period has elapsed.
MAYOR
t
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W. BUSSE
TIMOTHY J CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R VAN DEEM
THEODORE J WAT7ENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLEAK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A, FIELDS
Phone 312 / 392-6000
AGENDA
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Special Meeting
Thursday, August 10, 1989
8:00 P. M.
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
ZBA-47-V.82. Edwi a
Muniz, 1004 LingolL
This case was continued from the July 27, 1989 Zoning Board hearing. The applicant is
requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 0.5 foot side yard setback for a
walk/patio area instead of 8 feet required. Also requested is a variation from Section
21.601. to allow a 5' 6" maximum fence height instead of 5 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals will be final with regards to the fence height variation, however, Village Board
action will be required for the side yard variation.
ZBA-50-V-89, Chgrles Wilson, 508 N
--Qrth inview
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.13.1, to allow a 3'-4" side yard
setback from the detached garage instead of 5 feet normally required. Also requested is
a variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow 54% impervious lot surface coverage instead
of 45% maximum. The Zoning Board of Appeals will be final for both requests.
ZBA-41-V-89, r, & Mrs. -5 orske/Alroom. Inc.. 128 South Waverly
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a 3'-6" side yard
instead of 6.5 feet in order to expand the attached garage. Village Board action,"411 be
required for this request.
Resolutions
ZBA-46-V-89, Vicki Larson, 1901 Hopi Lane
In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen (15) day period is
provided for anyone wishing to appeal their decision. No permit will be issued until this
period has elapsed.
This memo is to remind you that the next meeting of the
1tenty Executive Committee is scheduled for Wednesday July 19, 1989 at
Qf 8:30 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Library. The agenda for
Northern the meeting follows.
Cook AGENDA
County
I. Call to Order
!U Sown Emerson
Vowir Prospect, 1L 6005
P4rnre .'12,^_53-6323 6II . Ap ,,oval of Minutes
Fccr +12,,253-6330
III. Finance
A. Payment Request - The following invoices, totalling
5141,471.11, have been submitted and are recominended
for payment.
FIRM
Members Hanmer Pork
AMOUNT
Carlson Knight
Hoffman Esrares
$1,725.00
& Kudrna
irlinuon Heiehrs Inverness VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE
Rarrincum Kenilworrl2
Printing Phase I
288.15
Ratfalo Grote Lineoimtood
Des Plaines iforrorr Grote
�—
Elk Grote 6illane Mounr Prospect
Fransron VileS141teellnY
Cha7rmon. F—c. C -11e,
898.15
Glencoe Vorrhbrook Wibnerte
Glenne,,
William F Abolt
Vorthf9eld Wmnelka
Feruace Ofr a -
45,645.09
t/%//G�llllr�lllrrlttllllrrl '((000111111#110M Via
TO:
Executive Committee
Environmental, Permits,
Financing
FROM:
WILL'= F. Abolt, Executive Director
SUBJECT:
Executive Committee Meeting,
Wednesday July 19
DATE:
July 14, 1989
Solid
haste
This memo is to remind you that the next meeting of the
1tenty Executive Committee is scheduled for Wednesday July 19, 1989 at
Qf 8:30 A.M. at the Mount Prospect Public Library. The agenda for
Northern the meeting follows.
Cook AGENDA
County
I. Call to Order
!U Sown Emerson
Vowir Prospect, 1L 6005
P4rnre .'12,^_53-6323 6II . Ap ,,oval of Minutes
Fccr +12,,253-6330
III. Finance
A. Payment Request - The following invoices, totalling
5141,471.11, have been submitted and are recominended
for payment.
FIRM
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Carlson Knight
Professional Services
$1,725.00
& Kudrna
IEPA Permit
Holmes Company
Printing Phase I
288.15
Planning Studies
Lake Shore Reporting
Rolling Meadows Hearing
898.15
Service
Transcripts
Mayer, Brown & Platt
Legal Services -
45,645.09
General Counsel
Environmental, Permits,
Financing
FIRM
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Metro Transportation
Rolling meadows
199.50
Transfer Traffic Study
Patrick Engineering
Balefill and Transfer
5,563.05
Station Engineering
Services
Patrick Engineering
IEPA Permit Resubmittal
44,000.00
Samelson, Knickerbocker
Legal Services -
4,636.10
Option Extension
Schain, Firsel &
Legal Services -
32,016.07
Burney
Transfer Station,
Zoning, Litigation
SWANCC
July Expenses
5,000.00
William Griffen & Community Relations 11500.00
Associates Services
$141,471.11
ACTION EMKS-TED- Approve Budget
B. Prosect E�Lnancinca - In August the financing team
will renew work on the $2 million financing.
ACTION RMUESIM: Information
IV. Sitinc7 Update
A. Balefill Permit - Staff will- update the Committee
on the Ba-lefill Project'. The revised permit
application was submitted to the IEPA on July 6.
ACTION EB22ESTED. Information
B. Rolling Meadows Transfer Station - Staff and
consultants -have been participating in a number of
public meetings regarding the Rolling Meadows
Transfer Station in an effort to explain SWANCC's
proposal. Additional meetings will be held next
week. Palatine officials have scheduled an
informational meeting with citizens and the village
Board on Tuesday, July 18, and the City of Rolling
Meadows will conduct its legislative deliberations
on the local siting approval request on Wednesday,
July 19.
Staff will update the Committee on the siting
request and the controversy and interest that has
surrounded the plan over the last few weeks.
ACTION REQUESTED: Information
V. New Business
VI. Old Business
VII. Adjournment
ms
Mr. Weidaw moved approval of the minutes of
the may 17 meeting. The motion was seconded
by President Schultz and approved unanimously.
Mr. Bonder then moved approval of the minutes
of the may 23 special meeting. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Weidaw and approved
unanimously.
III. Finance
A. Audit
Staff distributed a draft of the audit for
FY88-89. The audit will be presented to
the full Board at its next meeting.
Members Hanover Park
Pa,, Sheila H. Schultz
Hoffman Estates
Park-lq(idge Chair mn. lid. of Direcron
Arlington Heights Inverness
Prospect Heights
Barrington Kenilworth
Rolling Meadows George Van Dusen
Buffalo Grove Lincolnwood
Roselle V— chairman
Des Plaines Morton Grove
Elk Grove Village Mount Prospect
Skokie William R. Balling
South Barrington
Evanston Niles
ch-. aec. commiffee
Wheeling
Glencoe Northbrook
Glenview Northfield
Wilmette William F Abolt
Winnerka Execuave Director
EXECUTIVE ME=
Wednesday, June
28,1989
Mount Prospect Public
MINUTES
Library
I. CAU t2 Order
Solid
The meeting was called to
order by Chairman
Waste
Bill Balling at 8:37 AM.
Agency
AITENDA=
Of
Northern
Name Position
=ic:, pality
Cook
County
Ralph Arthur Trustee
Mount Prospect
Bill Balling Manager
Buffalo Grove
10 South Emerson
Ken Bonder Manager
Arlington Hts.
,Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Bob Buechner Manager
Winnetka
Phone 3121253-6323
Al Rigoni Manager
Skokie
Fax J121253-6330
Sheila Schultz President Wheeling
Bob Weidaw Manager
Northbrook
ABSENT
Mike O'Malley President Hoffman Estates
Chuck Willis Manager
Elk Grove
II. Approval g_t Minutes
Mr. Weidaw moved approval of the minutes of
the may 17 meeting. The motion was seconded
by President Schultz and approved unanimously.
Mr. Bonder then moved approval of the minutes
of the may 23 special meeting. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Weidaw and approved
unanimously.
III. Finance
A. Audit
Staff distributed a draft of the audit for
FY88-89. The audit will be presented to
the full Board at its next meeting.
B. Payment Request
Mr. Rigoni moved approval of the following invoices, totalling
$436,237.31.
rim
PURPOSE
AMOUNT
Ann Aitchisen
TEPA Planning Grant $
247.00
Recycling Study
Tracy Bacilek
Logo and Stationery
500.00
Design, Production
Oversight
Camiros
Rolling Meadows
6,304.84
Transfer Station -
Planning Services
Carlson Knight &
Professional Services -
1,050.00
Kudrna
Balefill Permitting
Chicago Gravel Co.
option Extension and
122,331.16
Property Taxes Per
Land Contract
Holmes Co.
Stationery
236.96
Mayer, Brown &
Legal Services - General
22,280.30
Platt
Counsel, Environmental
Financing
Metro Transportation
Rolling Meadows Transfer
6,365.47
Station - Traffic
Engineering
Terrence O'Brien &
Rolling Meadows Transfer
18,862.50
Co.
Station - Appraisal
Services & 404
Alternative Analysis
Patrick
Engineering services -
3,548.50
Engineering
Balefill/Transfer
Station
Patrick
Additional Services
131,055.83
Engineering
HR -5247 Mandates, USEPA
Response, Litigation,
Cost Estimates, Dam Safety
Permit
Patrick Engineering IEPA Planning Grant 41,358.85
Patrick Engineering Balefill Development Perm -it 44,000.00
Schain, Firsel & Transfer Station Legal 31,595.90
Burney Services, Litigation
SWANCC July Expenses 5,000.00
$436,237.31
Following discussion in which it was explained that all but
essential work had been discontinued following the IEPA action on
the Balefill, and most of the invoices covered by the payment
request were for work prior to the denial, the motion, seconded
by Mr. Bonder, was approved unanimously.
IV. Siting Update
The Committee discussed plans for resubmittal of the IEPA permit
application for the Balefill. The target date for resubmittal
was July 6.
The Committee then discussed the Rolling Meadows Transfer Station
and the controversery that had arisen regarding the site. The
Palanois Park subdivision in Palatine had protested the proposal
before the Palatine Village Board.
The Committee went into Executive Session at 9:20 to discuss
land acquisition and returned to regular session at 9:50.
V. qld Business
The Committee discussed the need for a meeting in July and the
concern that a quorum would not be present. The Committee,
however, deferred any decision regarding whether the meeting
should be cancelled. Staff would get a better idea as to
whether there would be a quorum and whether there was enough
business to warrant a meeting.
VI. Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned at 9:58 AM.
kk
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES... ..
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W BUSSE
TIMOTHY FOROS OORCORAN
OFL
Village f Mount Prospect
GE
LEO RGE R., VAN DEEM
THEODORE J: WATTENBERG
VILLAGE MANAGER 100 S. Emerson Mount. Pf OSpect, Illinois 600556
JOHN FULTON, DIXON
Phone312 / 332-5000
AGENDA
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Regular Meeting
Thursday, July 27, 1989
8:00` P. M.
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
BA - hyr E, MgM-mis, North Side of KgjWingt&n.Ea f- Russell Street
This case has been continued from the July 13, 1989 hearing. The applicant is requesting
a rezoning from B-2 Office District to B-4 Business Retail and Service District to allow a
full -serve car wash to be constructed on the vacant parcel. Village Board Action will be
required in this case.
IB -413 Ll- Zft
4 lfi rt 41 im l r It
The applicants are requesting a special use to allow a four -car garage as per Section
14.1101.C.6 and a variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 980 square foot garage
instead of 600 square feet as permitted by Code. Also a'variation from Section 14.116.0.
s requested to allow a, 39 foot wide driveway width instead of 21 feet normally allowed by
Code. Villagq Board action will be required with all requests.
ZBA46. - Vi lcLaMp, 1201 H912i janc
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 21.601.A.3 in order to allow a fence
to extend 16 feet beyond the rear building line along the side street on a corner lot. Code
normally requires that any fence on a corner lot be entirely behind the rear building line.
The Zoning Board of Appeals will be final in this request.
B -4 -"_ Edwin uni 'w n_ In
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 0.5 foot side
yard setback in order` to allow a patio. Code would normally require an 8 foot side yard
setback Also tequested is a variation from Section 21.601. in order to allow a 5' 6"
maximum fence height instead of 5 feet normally allowed by Cade. Village Board action
will be required for the side yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals will final with
regards to the :fence height.
BAS
The applicant is requestinj
to allow an 18 foot drivew
Code. Also requested is a
for the purposes of a ;park
Code. And filly 'a varix
yard for the parking pad
Village Board 'action will 1
Board of Appeals will be f
ZAAA2--VJ- m—M Oil applicant is requesting
1. Section 22.806'
conforming to I.D.0
2. Section 16.405 of
conforming to I.D.0
3. Section 14.604.E
variations to this pr(
Village Board action will b
RgLoluti
Z-39-89 Jeffrey Cesaretti
of Appeals; Agenda
ming Code" in order
d mart, gas station,
to plan modifications
to previously granted
(15)day period is
be issued until this
Phone 312 / 3J2-6000
AGENDA
FINANCE COMMISSION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THURSDAY, JULY 27, 1989
7:30 P.M.
TRUSTEES ROOM
2ND FLOOR VILLAGE HALL
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
III. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY
IV. REVIEW OF 1989/90 PROJECTS
V. SELECTION OF 1989/90 MEETING DATES
VI. REVIEW OF JUNE 30, 1989 BUDGET REPORT MATERIAL
TO BE PROVIDED AT MEETING
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W. ARTHUR
MARK W. BUSSE
TIMOTHY J. CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R. VAN SEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
Village o f Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A. FIELDS
Phone 312 / 3J2-6000
AGENDA
FINANCE COMMISSION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THURSDAY, JULY 27, 1989
7:30 P.M.
TRUSTEES ROOM
2ND FLOOR VILLAGE HALL
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
III. ELECTION OF VICE-CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY
IV. REVIEW OF 1989/90 PROJECTS
V. SELECTION OF 1989/90 MEETING DATES
VI. REVIEW OF JUNE 30, 1989 BUDGET REPORT MATERIAL
TO BE PROVIDED AT MEETING
VII. OTHER BUSINESS
VIII. ADJOURNMENT
.N
MAYOR':
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES ,.
RALPH W ARTHUR -
MARK W SUSSE>'.
TIMOTHY SRAN
LEO FLORO5 Village offMountProspect rospect
GEORGE R, VAN DEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
VILLAGE MANAGED 100 GC
i"I"1 E31"'SCY I'1 :MCOUt'1t Prospect, {II{nofs 6006
JOHN FULTON DIXON
Phone 312 ! 392-6000
N T_I C E
JULY 19, 1989
THE JULY 26 1989 MEETING OF THE BUSINESS DISTRICT
DEVELOPMENTAND REDEVELOPMENTCOMMISSION HAS BEEN
CANCELLED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT BUSINESS. THE NEXT
MEETING OF THE BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND
REDEVELOPMENT COM:MISSION WILL BE WEDNESDAY, AUGUST
23,1988- AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT 'PRIOR 'TO THIS MEETING.