Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
0139_001
I MINUTES COMMITTEE OF THE WHOLE MAY 23, 1989 The meeting was called to order at 734 p.m. Present at the meeting were: Mayor Gerald L. Farley; Trustees Ralph Arthur, MarkBusse, Timothy Corcoran, Leo Floros, George Van Geem. and Theodore Wattenberg. Also present at the meeting were: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon, Assistant Village Manager Michael Jannis, Police Chief Ronald Pavlock and Finance Director David Jepson. Also present were three persons from the print media, The Minutes of the Committee of the Whole meeting of May 9, 1989 were accepted and filed. MUNA&KOWW"IMIU) Mr. Donald Harmon, 16 North William Street, Mount Prospect, addressed the Committee members regarding his opinion on various items including: 1. That no elected officials of other local governing bodies should be permitted to sit on voluntary Village Boards and Commissions. 2. That all Commission members should be required to strictly adhere to all Village Ordinances and if they don't, they should be subject to removal. 3. That persons requesting Variations before the Zoning Board of Appeals be required to show more true hardship as part of their cases. 4. Mr. Harmon supported the Village's decision to maintain a five foot maximum fence height. Committee members thanked Mr. Harmon for his input. IV. Mayor Gerald Farley indicated that he had asked the Village Manager to place this item on the Agenda for consideration by the full Board. It was Mayor Farley's opinion that the State Liquor Control Commission, who reviews the decisions of local liquor commissioners, was not generally sensitive to the concerns of municipalities with regard to the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages within their borders. Mayor Farley also felt that by providing for direct Appeal of Local Liquor Commission. Orders to the Circuit Court anunnecessary step in the Appeal process could be avoided. Finally, Mayor Farley felt that it was somewhat ironic and inappropriatethat upon Appeal to the Circuit Court by a municipality of a ruling of the State Liquor Commissioner, the State's. Attorney General serves as the Attorney for the establishment owner. This appears to be a waste of the taxpayers' money in that two units of government are placed in an adversarial position. Mayor Farley explained that under the direct Appeal process, a bar owner would be protected from economic harm because of an automatic stay provision built into the Appeal process as well as also benefitting from one less step in the Appeal process. Village Manager Sohn Fulton Dixon reiterated many outer comments that Mayor Farley made and added that not all decisions of the ,Local Liquor Commission were reviewable by the State Commission. Therefore, the actual number of times an Appeal could be ;made to the State Commissioner were limited in the first place. Trustee Timothy Corcoran inquired whether other local decisions are regularly appealable to a State Commission. Mr. Dixon responded that he was not aware of any other situation in which a decision of a municipality was not directly appealable in the Circuit Court. Trustee Mark Busse inquired as to how many cases per year would be subject to this new Appeal process. Mr. Dixon responded thn� relatively few Local Liquor Commissions are actually appealed to 'the State''t , nmission. Only those most serious violations in which suspension or revocation were involved were likely to be appealed. Trustee George Van, Geem asked for information regarding a summary of cases with outcomes, findings and rationale of the State Liquor Commissioner in over- turning Local. Liquor Commissioner decisions. -2- Trustee Ted Wattenberg indicated that he felt the Amendment was overkill and that he needed more documentation to view the change favorably. He cited only two Mount Prospect cases that he was aware of in which Appeals to the State Liquor Commission were taken. Trustee Ralph Arthur stated he fully supported the Village Attorney's recommendation. He indicated it was obvious that there would be less cost involved if a step in the Appeal process was removed. He also was not concerned that Mount Prospect would be the first community to establish such an Appeal procedure. Trustee Leo Floros added that he was generally favorable of the recommendation but would like to see additional information. There was additional discussion among Committee members regarding the propriety of the State's Attorney General representing a bar owner against the Village in an Appeal to the Circuit Court. The consensus of the Committee was to place this item on the June 6 Village Board Agenda for consideration subject to review of the additional information requested. U., 1'. 1 �OJWAI Village Manager John Fulton Dixon reviewed briefly with Committee members the recent activities surrounding the upgrading of the Northwest Central Dispatch System. Mr. Dixon indicated that the Referendum for the Enhanced 911 System was overwhelmingly passed and that as a result, the member communities needed to move forward on a new facility to house the necessary equipment. Mr. Dixon indicated that the other three member communities - Buffalo Grove, Arlington Heights and Elk Grove Village - had already approved the Lease Agreement. Under the Lease Agreement, the Village would be responsible for approximately 28% of the cost of constructing a new $700,000 facility in Arlington Heights. The Village would also be responsible for a percentage of the rental cost over the course of a 20 -year Lease. Mr. Dixon indicated that an additional ten-year option was built into the Lease Agreement. It was indicated that a present target date of January 1, 1991 had been'se, for completion of the facility and the start-up of the Enhanced 911 System. Mayor Gerald Farley asked whether soil testing had been done on the site to see if it was suitable for building. Mr. Dixon indicated that once all parties had signed on to the Lease Agreement, extensive review of the site would be undertaken before any construction was begun. -3- Trustee Leo Floros inquired as to whether there was a possibility for an expansion of the System to include more communities. NWCDS Executive Director Doug Edmonds indicated that there had been some preliminary talks with neighboring communities who have expressed an interest in joining the System. However, he indicated that nothing was firm at this time. Trustee Timothy Corcoran inquired as to the physical expansion capability of the building. Again, Mr. Edmonds indicated that the current design of the new facility would allow for a doubling of the console space for dispatching and tracking systems. Mr. Edmonds felt that if additional members came on board, the facility, as presently designed, could handle such an expansion. Nonetheless, there was the ability to physically expand the building if that should become necessary. Mr. Edmonds continued by explaining that the costs for furniture and other amenities for the building would be paid for out of a Reserve Fund which the Dispatch System has been funding on a regular basis. He also indicated that those costs that were eligible under the 911 surcharge would be paid for through that mechanism. There was general discussion among Committee members regarding particular aspects of the operation and the new generation of console equipment and computers. The consens7�,. of -.`e Committee was to give approval to enter into the Lease Agreement. A nis i iem will be placed on the June 6 Village Board Agenda. VI- CD -M RQDM SEMM - EUBLIC SAFM ALULDIN!G1 Village Manager John Fulton Dixon gave a brief overview of the current status of the municipal Court Room in the Public Safety Building. He indicated that the Court would be moving into its Rolling Meadows facilities on or about June 1. At that time, the Village would recapture that space for its own, use. Pending the outcome of a staff report regarding future use of the Public Safety Building, Mr. Dixon was recommending that the space be utilized by -and -large for Village -wide training, Additionally, some of the space would be used as interview rooms for victims and some evening counseling.There was also a suggestion that the Zoning Board of Appeals' meetings be moved `frc,in this location to 50 South Emerson Street. Trustees asked that a check be made to see whether there would be a conflict with scheduled senior activities on the evenings when the ZBA would meet. General discussion among Committee members resulted in a consensus that the short-term use of the Court Room follow the use of the recommendation of the Village Manager. -4- E Trustee Timothy Corcoran asked that a Public Safety Facilities Study include a 20 - year timeframe to account for all possible expansions and future needs. WOMENZAVU70) Village Manager reviewed with Committee members a "Spiller Pays" Ordinance that would require any entity which was responsible for a hazardous waste spill within the Village to reimburse the Village for any extraordinary expenses incurred as part of a clean-up or rescue operation. Mr. Dixon indicated that many, other jurisdictions have adopted such Ordinances as a means of recouping the sometime extraordinary costs associated with the clean-up of hazardous waste spills. Mr. Dixon indicated that the intent of the Ordinance was very clear and that it was meant to ensure that the ultimate responsibility for the clean-up remain with the entity which caused the spill. Mr. Dixon indicated that the MABAS communities were in the process of reviewing the adoption of a similar Ordinance. Discussion among Committee members was generally favorable regarding the Ordinance. However, Trustee George Van Geem, asked whether the penalty clause could be reworded so as to be permissive. Trustee Van Geem felt that it was somewhat ironic that a company who cooperated in reimbursing the Village for the cost of cleaning up the spill should then be fined for its activity. Trustee Timothy Corcoran inquired as to whether a $500 fine was substantial enough to serve as a deterrent to offending entities. He felt that it would be more appropriate to have a fine that equalled some percentage of the cost of the clean-up. Village staff was instructed to discuss these potential changes .with the Village Attorney. The item would be placed on the Aine 6 Village Board Agenda for further consideration. Mayor Gerald Farley asked for support from Committee members in forming an Ad Hoc Committee to study smoking restrictions for the Village. Mayor Farley indicated that he was looking at a Committee consisting of approximately 13 persons with a make-up that would be representative of the business community, anti -smokers and pro -smoking advocates. He also felt that the Village's Health Officer should be the staff liaison to the Committee. Finally, Mayor Farley suggested that Trustee Timothy Corcoran sit as the Chair of the Ad Hoc Committee. There was general discussion among Committee members and a favorable consensus was reached. Trustee Van Geem inquired about a specific timeframe. Mayor Farley indicated that he had no set timeframe in mind at this time. -5. Trustee Leo Floros indicated that he was not sure that the Chairman would be neutral in his deliberations and a compromise was reached by the Chairman agreeing not to be a voting member of the Committee. Trustee Arthur reported to Committee members that the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency had recently rejected the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County Permit for the balefill. Trustee Arthur indicated that the IEPA raised 25 issues which needed to be resolved before the Permit could be resubmitted for approval. Of the 25 issues, Trustee Arthur indicated that none were impossible to resolve. The questions which remained were one of timing and cost. However, recognizing that the member communities had little alternative, the SWANCC Executive Board directed staff to proceed with addressing each of the 25 items. Trustee Arthur stated that while this review process was going on, the Agency would not seek any additional funding for the project. Trustee Wattenberg asked that future consideration be given to the purchase of Citizens Utilities Company. Additionally, Trustee Wattenberg asked for an update on Police Union negotiations as well as a Litigation Report. IX. ADI OURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Committee of the Whole, the meeting was adjourned at 9:12 p.m. MEJ/rcw Respectfully submitted, MICHAEL E. JANONIS Assistant Village Manager "6- P R O C L A M A T I O N WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Jaycees promotes recognition of their community across the nation; and WHEREAS, the St. Jude's Research Hospital is an Internationally recognized charity of the Jaycees; and WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Jaycees believe and actively practice their belief that service to humanity is the best work of life; and WHEREAS, the residents and business community of the Village of Mount Prospect enthusiastically support the projects of the Mount Prospect Jaycees and their efforts on behalf of the St. Jude's Research Hospital; and WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Jaycees will represent the Village of Mount Prospect at St. Jude's Hospital on June 13, 1989, at which time they will entertain and present gifts to the children. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby declare June 13, 1989 as St. JUDE'S HOSPITAL DAY in the Village of Mount Prospect. I do further encourage our residents to support the Mount Prospect Jaycees in their worthwhile efforts. Gerald L. Farley Mayor Carol A. Fields Village Clerk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION TO AFFIRM OUR RESPECT FOR THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA WHEREAS, the flag of the United States of America is recognized throughout the world as a symbol representing freedom, opportunity, and equality of all persons; and WHEREAS, the flag of the United States of America is revered as a symbol of our country and its democratic way of life; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has a tradition of pride in the flag and our heritage; and WHEREAS, men and women of the Village of Mount Prospect have fought and died in defense of the flag and the Nation; and WHEREAS, respect for the flag and the standard of honor it represents must be supported and encouraged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby affirm our respect for the flag of the United States of America and urge all citizens to honor and display it with the respect it deserves. SECTION TWO: That all United States of America flags being displayed in Mount Prospect should be displayed in the appropriate manner, as set forth in the guidelines established by the National Flag Foundation, a copy of which guidelines are attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof of Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in, the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of f 1989. Gerald,L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Standards of Respect The Flag Code, which formalizes and unifies the traditional ways in which we give respect to the flag, also contains specific instructions on how the flag is not to be used. They are: • The flag should never be dipped to any person or thing. It is flown upside down only as a distress signal. • The flag should not be used as a drapery, or for cover- ing a speaker's desk, draping a platform, or for any dec- oration in general. Bunting of blue, white and red stripes is available for these purposes. The blue stripe of the bunting should be on top. • The flag should never be used for any advertising purpose. It should not be embroidered, printed or otherwise im- pressed on such articles as cushions, handkerchiefs, napkins, boxes, or anything intended to be discarded after temporary use. Advertising signs should not be attached to the staff or halyard. ! The flag should not be used as part of a costume or athletic uniform, except that a flag patch may be used on the uniform of military personnel, firemen, police- men and members of patriotic organizations. 0 The flag should never have placed on it, or attached to it, any mark, insignia, letter, word, number, figure, or drawing of any kind. • "fire flag should never be used as a receptacle for receiving, holding, carrying, or delivering anything. x�f* i When the flag is lowered, no part of it should touch the ground or any other object; it should be received by waiting hands and arms. To store the flag it should be folded neatly and ceremoniously. First fold it lengthwise in half, then repeat with the blue field on the outside. Finally, while one person holds it by the blue field, another makes a triangular fold in the opposite end and continues to fold it in triangles until the flag resembles a cocked hat, with only the blue field showing. The flag should be cleaned and mended when necessary. When a flag is so worn it is no longer fit to serve as the symbol of our country, it should be destroyed by burning in a dignified manner. God Bless America "While the storm clouds gather far across the sea, Let us swear allegiance to a land that's free, Let us all be grateful for a land so fair, As we raise our voices in a solemn prayer. God Bless America. Land that I love Stand beside her, and guide her Thru the night with a light from above. From the mountains, to the prairies, To the oceans, white with foam God Bless America My home sweet home." Fly the Flag The flag should be displayed, from sunrise to sunset, on all days when the weather permits, especially on, New Year's Day Inauguration Day Lincoln's Birthday Washington's Birthday Easter Sunday Mother's Day Armed Forces Day Memorial Day (half-staff until noon) Flag Day Independence Day Labor Day Constitution Day Columbus Day Navy Day Veterans Day Thanksgiving Day Christmas Day Election Days State and Local Holidays Your State Birthday (date of admission to the Union) and such other days as may be proclaimed by the President of the United States. How to honor it, how to display it. g A [Standard of Honor The flag of the Uniled States of America is a living thing that calls to our spirit, reminding us of the greatness of our America. We cherish and uphold it because it is the standard of honor under which we live. We view the flag with devotion, for it represents our national heritage of noble deeds, splendid accom- plishments, and untold sacrifices which combined to establish the moral character of our national foundation, (),if flag is a symbol that makes our past one with the present and makes the present a prophecy for tomorrow, It signifies a people dedicated to liberty, justice and frdona for all. is our companion around the world. It summons confidence on sight. There is a magic in its folds that continually renews the hope that this nation, under God, will long be an example everywhere for all who love freedom with honor. We give homage to the flag because it stands for the courageous, earnest, and unselfish experiences of our people who have given us strength as a nation and pride as citizens, We respect our flag because we have respect for our countrymen, and because our love for country finds its center in our flag. The customs and traditions which surround the display and use of our flag are guides to the means by which we as proud and grateful citizens may demon- strate the ultimate respect for the flag of our nation. In honoring and saluting our flag we demonstrate affection for our nation, fellow citizens and the proud inheritance r are. Pledge of Allegiance `1 pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indi- visible, with liberty and justice for all, , The pledge of allegiance should be rendered by standing at attention, facing the flag, and saluting, Displaying the Flag Indoors 0 � 6 When on display, the flag is accorded the place of honor, always positioned to its own right. Place it to the right of the speaker or staging area or sanctuary. Other flags should be to the left. The flag of the United States of America should be at the center and at the highest point of the group when a number of flags of states, localities, or societies are grouped for display. When one other flag is used with the flag of the I11 ti = d States of America and the staffs are crossed, the it the United States is placed on its own right with its )tal f in front of the other flag, u When displaying the flag against a will, vertically or horizontally, the flag's union (stars) should be at the top, to the Hag's own right, and the observer's left, Displaying the Flag Outdoors When the flag is displayed from a staff projecting from a window, balcony, or a building, the union should be at the peak of the staff unless the flag is at half staff. When it is displayed from the same flagpole with another flag - of a state, community, society or Scout unit - the flag of the United States must always be at the top except that the church pennant may be flown above the flag during church services for Navy personnel when conducted by a Naval chaplain on a ship at sea. When the flag is displayed over a street, it should be filing vertically, with the union to the north or east. If the flag is suspended over a sidewalk, the flag's union should be farthest from the building. When flown with flags of states, communities, or societies on separate flag poles which are of the same height and in a straight line, the flag of the United States is always placed in the position of honor—to its own right. ..The other flags may be smaller but atone may be larger. ..No other flag ever should be placed above it. ..The flag of the United States of AmerIlaa is always the first flag raised and the last to be lowered.t s s When flown with the national banner of other countries, each flag must be displayed from a separate pole of the same height. Each flag should be the same size. They should be raised and lowered simultaneousiv, Fire flag of one nation may not be displayed above that of another nation. s s s The flag should be raised briskly and lowered slowly and ceremoniously. Ordinarily it should be displayed only between sunrise and sunset. It should be iflurni- nated if displayed at night. The flag of the United States of America is saluted as it is hoisted and lowered. The salute is held until the flag is unsnapped from the halyard or through the last note of music, whichever is the longest. Our National Anthem The Star-Spangled Banner: Oh, say, can you see, by the dawn's early light, What so proudly we hailed at the twilight's last glean ' gl Whose broad stripes and bright stars, thro' the perdouk: t, O'er the ramparts we watched, were so gallantly streaming And the rockets' red glare, the bombs bursting in air, Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there. Oh, say, does that star-spangled banner yet wave O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave? On the shore dimly seen, thro' the mists of the deep, Where the foe's haughty host in dread silence reposes, What is that which the breeze, o'er tfie towering steep, As it fitfully blows, half conceals, half discloses? Now it catches the gleam of the morning's first beans, In full glory reflected, now shines can the stream, `Tis the star-spangled banner, oh, lona; may it wave O'er the land of the free and the house of the brave. Oh, thus be it ever when free men shall stand, Between their loved homes and the war's desolation; Blest with vict'ry and peace, may the heav'n-rescued land Praise the Power that has made and preserved us a nation, Then conquer we must, when our cause it is just, And this be our motto: "In Clod is our trust"; And the star-spangled banner in triumph shall wave O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave. The National Anthem and the Flag When the national anthem is played or sung, citizens should stand at attention and salute at the first noteand hold the salute through the last note. The salute is directed to the flag, it displayed, otherwise to the music. National Flag Foundation Invigorales America's Artachmenr to Freedom Since 1968 the Foundation has been serving America in all 50 States and overseas. NFFs mission is to stimulate love and pride of country in America's children and to serve as a primary resource of Flag etiquette and display inquiries. It is a patriotic forum broadcasting positive Americana profiles. Membershipand product infor- mation is available on request. FLAG PLAZA, PITTSBURGH, PENNSYLVANIA Flag Plaza—Scout Center—is a gift to this and future genera- tions of American Youth as a Memorial to Chester Hamilton Lehman, a citizen pre-eminent, by Vivian W. Lehman. Sixth Edition -Sixih Printing - August 1988, 200,000 copies. Total printing all edid—, 2,257,898. Copyright ©1985, 1988 by National Flag Foundation. Flag Plaza, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15219-412/261-1776 All rights reserved. Printed in the USA. ISBN 0-934021-03-1 The Flag in Mourning To place the flag at half staff, hoist it to the peak for an instant and then lower it to a position half way between the top and bottom of the staff. The flag is to he raised again to the peak for a moment before it is lowered. On Memorial Day the flag is displayed at half staff until noon and at full staff from noon to sunset. The flag i; to be flown at half staff in mourning for designated, principal government leaders and upon presi- dential or gubernatorial order. When used to cover a casket, the flag should be placed with the union at the head and over the left shoulder. It should not be lowered into the grave. Parading and Salute the Flag When carried in a procession, the flag shot , , the right of the marchers. When other flags aro 6 - tile flag of the United States may be centered it, f t rim the others or carried to their rigilt. when the fia rr t cat in a procession, or when it is hoisted or IoZ9 paw,, should face the flag, stand at attention and sal"to red, 1! The Salute W �a TO salute, all persons come to attention. `(hose it, Uraliat give the appropriate formal salute. Citizens not itt uni{in ttl salute by placing their right hand over the heart and tit III with head cover hold it to left shoulder. Meita ill organizations in formation salute upon comman fkrs of person in charge, t ofthe WLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEef PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER 'NAL FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: JUNE 8, 1989 SUBJECT: PARKING STUDY Attached for your review is a draft request for proposal for a parking study of the Emerson Street corridor. The purpose of the study is to examine current and future parking demand of the First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect, the Mount Prospect Library, Senior Center, Village Hall and Public Safety Building. We are asking for a consultant to detail and understand current parking conditions, and provide a recommendation for increasing parking facilities in the study area. The scope of the study has been discussed with several parking experts, and I believe this request for proposal provides a detailed program that will help examine the parking problem along Emerson Street and provide a recommendation for solutions. DMC:hg REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Purpose To improve the off-street and on -street parking in the Emerson Street corridor between Central Road and Northwest Highway. Identify the existing and future demand for employees, customers and the general public for the First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect Public Library, Senior Center, Village Hall and Public Safety Building. Recommend a development plan to correct deficiencies. Develop an alternative parking plan to satisfy current and future parking demand int his area. Qbjectiv To provide adequate and convenient parking for customers, employees, and the public, for uses in the Emerson Street corridor. Parking should satisfy demand and not have any adverse effect on any nearby residential properties. Area The boundaries of the study are south of Central Road, north of Northwest Highway, between Maple Street and Route 83. V%V 11ag Palliduation The Village will provide the consultant with a base map and zoning map. Also, a Central Business District p,) -'; n& inventory from 19135 will be provided. The inventory provides information on the number of on -street and off-street parking spaces and occupancy rates, and will be helpful in providing a background for existing conditions on Emerson Street. $-cobs of Set-YICeS A. Develop a procedure for determining parking demand and parking generation for each land -use in the study area. This is to include an analysis of employee parking, visitor parking, short-term and long-term customer parking. 1. Procedure must include a formula to determine parking demand and parking generation for each land -use, for each type of parker. 2. Procedure must include an examination of shared parking, and different time - of -day requirements. 3. The formula should enable Village staff to determine parking demand and parking generation for any potential development in the Emerson Street corridor. B. Develop parking standards for each type of parker. 1. Desirable and maximum distance from each use to parking supply 2. Time limits Request for Proposal Page 2 3. Type of parking control C. Considering current land uses in the Emerson Street corridor, identify deficiencies in parking supply for employee parking, visitor parking, short-term and long-term customer parking. 1. Examine the relationship between public and private parking facilities 2. Examine the relationship between parking supply and land uses D. Identify deficiencies in the existing administration or control of public and private facilities, including, but not limited to: 1. Time limits 2. Enforcement 3. Regulations E. Develop Parking Facilities Plan 1. Provide estimate of total number of parking spaces required in the corridor for all uses. 2. Provide recommendation for maximizing parking spaces in the corridor a) Indicate locations for private or public parking lot expansion, prepare site plan b) Provide revised parking lot layout for existing lots to maximize number of spaces c) If present or future parking demand in the corridor indicates the need for a parking structure or additional surface part -ling lots, indicate preferred location. Provide construction cost estimate i any such parking structure. List sources of financing, analysis of parking revenues and annual operating costs. d) Provide recommendation for on -street time regulations, and manpower estimate for proper enforcement. e) Consider remote parking lot locations for major employers in the corridor Request for Proposal Page 3 F. Reporting 1. Provide draft report to Director of Planning and Zoning for distribution to Bank, Library and for review by the Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission. (BDDRC) Consultant must present findings BDDRC. 2. Upon review and recommendation by BDDRC, provide necessary changes to plan. Present report to Board of Trustees. 3. Following adoption of plan, make and deliver 50 copies of corridor plan to project coordinator. MINUTES BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION May 17, 1989 The special meeting of the Mount Prospect Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission was held on Wednesday, May 17, 1989. The meeting was called to order at 7:05 P.M. by Chairman Predovich. Members of the Commission present: Earl Johnson, John Eilering, Joseph Janisch, Hal Predovich, Bart Ke1jik. Absent Irvana Wilks. Also present were Janet Hansen, Executive Director Chamber of Commerce, Mark Busse, Village Trustee, T. D. Roche Taegel, Mount Prospect Journal Reporter, and Kenneth Fritz, Economic Development Director. The minutes of Mai cn- 8'v;ere approved by a motion by Joseph Janisch and Earl Johnson. The motion passed unanimously. The minutes of April 26 meeting were approved unanimously on a motion by John Eilering and seconded by Joseph Janisch. Continued review of the development goals and objectives for downtown redevelopment Discussion focused on refinement of thirteen factors or objectives that were developed as a refinement of the earlier goals and objectives dbvb16p6d - February 1988 by BDDRC. Mr. Predovich led the discussion and asked the members of the Commission to review the wording of each objective and to eliminate or condense the objective statement. it was the general consensus of the group that as few words as possible should be used for each objective statement but that an explanatory paragraph regarding the intent behind each objective might be more easily understood by persons reviewing the goals and objectives. Irvana Wilks, not present for the meeting, submitted her observations and comments on each of the thirteen objectives. Her comments formed the basis for further discussion among the members present. (2) The subject of a visual focal paint in the downtown area was discussed at some length. Mr. Predovich referred to the 1976 Plan that called for possible open plaza in the center of the Governmental -Office area east of Main Street, centered on the �ntersecttion of Busse Avenue and Emerson Street. He indicated that this was the quandrant that was suggested in the 1976 Plan as being the focal point a public gathering place (plaza). Mr. Fritz pointed out that the intersection of Busse -Emerson need not be closed to through traffic, but that one of the corners of the intersection could instead be utilized as a plaza that could provide the necessary area for such events as art fairs and other special village sponsored events. Mr. Predovich indicated that it would be wise to have one more meeting prior to passing the goals and objectives on to the Village Board and others. A meeting was set for May 31 St. AQMRNM The meeting was adjourned at 8:33 P.M. on a motion by Joseph Janisch, seconded by Earl Johnson. spe Ily .mitt:• Kenneth H. Fritz Economic • 0 M