HomeMy WebLinkAbout4710_001Next Ordinance No. 4479
Next Resolution No. 29-92
Paw -(A- I I
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting ROOM, ISt Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
II. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
October 20, 1992
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald "Skip' Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Clowes Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Busse
IV. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, October 6, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: Halloween, October 31, 1992
B. PROCLAMATION: PORNOGRAPHY AWARENESS WEEK,
October 25, - November 1, 1992
C. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: Fire Department
D. PRESENTATION: Fire Prevention Poster Contest Winners
E. Request from Applebee's Neighborhood Grill & Bar for
a Class "S" liquor license. The establishment is
located in Randhurst in the area formerly occupied
by Kroch & Brentanols.
F. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE REFERENDUM RELATIVE TO
STATE MANDATES ON LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
G. Appointments
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends the Sign Code by creating
a Special Use category for off -premise signs
(Charlie Club). The Sign Review Board
recommended approving this request by a vote
of 5-0.
(Exhibit A)
(Exhibit B)
B. ZBA 59-Z-92 and ZBA 60 -SU -92, 805 Edgewood Lane
1. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH RESPECT TO THE
ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R -X TO R-1
(SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT AS IT
PERTAINS TO PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 805 AND 807 EDGEWOOD LANE
This ordinance re -zones the subject property
from R -X to R-1, to permit the subdivision
of this large lot into 2 lots in order to
construct 2 single family homes. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended approving this
request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
SPECIAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTIES
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 805 EDGEWOOD LANE AND
807 EDGEWOOD LANE
This ordinance grants a Special Use to
permit a 3 -car garage and a variation for
a driveway 30 feet wide, tapering to 21
feet at the property line. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these
request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit D)
3. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING
MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR
PROPERTY C014MONLY KNOWN AS 805 AND 807
EDGEWOOD LANE
This ordinance waives the requirements to
install sidewalks, curb and gutter, street
paving, street lighting, and lot depth. The
Plan Commission recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit E)
4, A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR PROPERTIES COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 805 EDGEWOOD LANE
This Resolution authorizes the Restrictive
Covenant to guarantee installation of
specified improvements at a date determined
appropriate by the Village. (Exhibit F)
5. Preski's Plat of Resubdivision
This subdivision divides one large lot into
two lots for the purpose of constructing two
single family homes. The Plan Commission
reviewed the proposed resubdivision and
recommended approval.
B. ZBA 63-V-92, 1028 Beechwood
1. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 1028 BEECHWOOD
This ordinance grants variations to allow a
27 foot wide driveway and lot coverage
of 40%, rather than the permitted 35%. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit G)
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING
MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1028 BEECHWOOD
This Ordinance grants a modification from
the Development Code to allow a driveway
apron 27 feet in width, rather than the
permitted 21 feet. The Plan Commission
recommended granting this request by a
vote of 5-0. (Exhibit H)
C. ZBA 66-V-92 and ZBA 67 -SU -92, 1430 Bonita
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
AND SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1430 BONITA
This Ordinance grants a Special Use to permit a
3 -car garage and variations to permit driveway
width of 26, 8" and a 48W lot coverage. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by a vote of 7-0.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 68-V-92, 212 South Owen
The Petitioner has filed an appeal from the
decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals to deny
this request for a 6 foot high fence.
B. Request of residents to reduce the speed limit
from 30 MPH to a 20 MPH speed limit on I -Oka
between Sha Bonee Trail and Hi Lusi, and on
Milburn between Hi Lusi and Pine Street
(School Speed Zones), for the safety of
children attending St. Raymonds School. The
Safety Commission recommended granting these
amendments to the Traffic Code.
C. Request of residents to establish a 4 -way STOP
at the intersection of Milburn and I -Oka. The
Safety Commission recommended granting this
amendment to the Traffic code.
D. Request to remove the restriction prohibiting
diagonal parking on Ida Court.
E. Request of staff t ' 0 eliminate the following
on -street parking spaces on Prospect Avenue:
1. One metered parking space just east of
Emerson Street; and
2. Four parking stalls, also just east of
Emerson Street.
These changes are being proposed in conjunction
with the relocation of the existing meter
box from the east side of the pedestrian
sidewalk leading from the tracks to Prospect
Avenue to the west side which will provide
better visibility for pedestrians.
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. 225 ampere transfer switch and accessories for
the Huntington Lift Station, 601 W. Golf Road
2. Gasoline and diesel fuel
B. Request to retain Greeley & Hansen as engineering
consultants in conjunction with the high service
pump replacement program.
Request to waive bidding procedure and authorize
Purchase from Insituform for sewer rehabilitation.
Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Litigation
B. Review Minutes of Executive Sessions in order to
determine if any of the minutes can be released.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
(Exhibit i)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCTOBER 6, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
223,776
ROLL CALL
178,431
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
24,287
Trustee Mark Busse
13,034
Trustee George Clowes
401,949
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
5,384
Trustee Leo Floras (arrived late)
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Vehicle Replacement Fund
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
INVOCATION
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.
The invocation was given by Trustee Wilks.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Police & Fire Building Const.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks,
APPROVE
moved to approve the minutes of the regular
MINUTES
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees
Debt Service Funds
held September 15, 1992.
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Escrow Deposit Fund
Hoefert, Wilks
Police Pension Fund
Nays: None
Firemen's Pension Fund
Motion carried.
Benefit Trust Fund
Trustee Floros arrived at this point.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes,
APPROVE
moved to approve the following list of bills:
BILLS
General Fund
$ 585,488
Refusal Disposal Fund
223,776
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
178,431
Community Development Block Grant Fund
24,287
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
13,034
Water & Sewer Fund
401,949
Parking System Revenue Fund
5,384
Risk Management Fund
151,219
Vehicle Replacement Fund
1,255
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.
65,982
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
68
Police & Fire Building Const.
264,773
Flood Control Revenue Fund
25,347
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
25,474
Police Pension Fund
41,472
Firemen's Pension Fund
47,118
Benefit Trust Fund
$2,055,057
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - October 6, 1992
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
CAMPAIGN SIGNS
Bill Blaine, candidate for the State Senate, requested,
LEARNING
the Village suspend enforcement of the Sign Code
DISABILITIES
relative to political signs in the parkway and on
local telephone and power poles.
UNITED WAY
Mayor Farley stated that placing signs in approved
areas provides the desired result relative to
political signs.
DRAINAGE: THOMAS
Clarence Bobikewiez, 1114 Meadow Lane, expressed
MORE SUBDIVISION
concern relative to the difference in ground level
between his property and a new home in the Thomas More
Subdivision, noting that drainage problems could be
created.
Village Manager Janonis stated that he would have the
Village Engineer check the area and would get back to
Mr. Bobikewiez.
BOAT TRAILER:
Richard Hendricks, 1537 East Emmerson Lane, stated that
1510 E.EMMERSON
he feels the staff's interpretation of the Village
Code relative to trailers is incorrect. Mr. Hendricks
stated that the boat on the trailer has been parked in
the side yard at 1510 E. Emmerson Lane for 2 years,
and his interpretation of the Code prohibits
commercial vehicles in an residential district. Mr.
Hendricks also stated that the boat or trailer has not
moved in those 2 years.
Allen Gilbert, 1510 E. Emmerson Lane, stated that the
boat in question is his and while he hasn't had time
to Use the boat, it will be put to use soon.
Mayor Farley stated that a boat trailer is not a
commercial trailer but rather a necessary method of
transportation for the boat and that he supports
staff's interpretation of the Code.
Page 2 - October 6, 1992
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATIONS:
Mayor Farley proclaimed the month of October as
LEARNING
Learning Disabilities Month.
DISABILITIES
Mayor Farley also presented a Proclamation to
UNITED WAY
representatives of the Mount Prospect/ Prospect Heights
noting the "Kick Off" for the 1992/93 United Way fund
raising drive.
VEHICLE STICKER
Diane Kumpf, President of the Mount Prospect Arts
CONTEST RESULTS
Council, and Chuck Bennett, member of the Arts
Council, joined Mayor Farley in announcing the
following winner s of the 1993/94 vehicle sticker
'
design contest and presenting them with cash prizes:
Terri Malkowsky $100
Laury Youngquist $ 50
Vito G. Glazers $ 25
Mark Hutchinson $ 25
Page 2 - October 6, 1992
Mayor Farley and Police Chief Pavlock presented
Certificates and Plaques to the following employees
in the Police Department in conjunction with the
annual quinquennial recognition:
EMPLOYEE
RECOGNITION
POLICE DEPT.
James D. Lange
25
Years
Dennis R. Leonard
25
Years
Michael E. Felten
20
Years
Steven G. Leonard
20
Years
Stephen Ramholz
20
Years
George R. Steiner, Jr.
20
Years
Robert J. Gibson
20
Years
Michael J. Kruchten
20
Years
Norma J. Withey
15
Years
Thomas J. Nowak
15
Years
Debra A. Dale
5
Years
Deborah A. Palmsiano
5
Years
Cathy J. Schmidt
5
Years
An Ordinance was presented
for first reading that would
AMEND CH. 13
amend Chapter 13 of the Village
Code by deleting the
CLASS "R"
Class "R11 liquor license issued
to House of Szchwan,
HOUSE OF
10 North Main Street. It was noted that the new owners
SZCHWAN
of this restaurant will not
offer alcoholic beverages.
10 N.MAIN
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floras,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4470
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mayor Farley requested the Board to concur with the
appointment of the following people to'the
Commissions stated:
Citizens' Ad-y-isgry Committeg-Wheeling Township -
Transfer Station
Dr. George Luteri Term Indefinite
Lois L. Brothers Term Indefinite
John G. Huddle Term Indefinite
Sign Revie!i ao_ar_d
John Mc Dermott Term to expire May, 1996
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
Page 3 - October 6, 1992
ORD.NO.4470
APPOINTMENTS
to concur with the recommendation of Mayor Farley to
make the appointments as stated above.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 - October 6, 1992
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 42-A-92
ZBA 42-A-92, Text'Amendment
TEXT AMENDMENT
Art ordinance was presented for first reading that
NON-RESIDENTIAL
would require a Special Use Permit for non -
USES IN
residential uses in a residential district. The
RESIDENTIAL
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting a
DISTRICT
text amendment relative to such uses.
It was noted that the proposed Ordinance had been
modified to establish specific non-residential uses
prohibited in a residential district.
ORD.NO. 4471
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4471.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING
ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Notion carried.
ZBA 51-V-92
ZEA 51-V-92, 1702 West Algonquin Road
1702 ALGONQUIN RD
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant a variation waiving the required loading
dock and to reduce the number of non -conforming
parking spaces by one. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4472
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4472.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1702 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks;
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 - October 6, 1992
8
ZBA 54 -SU -92, 416 S. Mount Prospect Road ZBA 54 -SU -92
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 416 MOUNT PROSPECT
would grant a Special Use to allow a satellite
dish ten feet in diameter to be located in the
rear yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved ORD.NO. 4473
for passage of Ordinance No. 4473
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 416 SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT
ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 58-V-92, 515 North Fairview ZBA 58-V-92
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 515 FAIRVIEW
grants a variation to allow front yard setback
of 23' 611, instead of the required 301, in order
to construct a porch with an overhead roof. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-1.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved ORD.NO. 4474
for passage of Ordinance No. 4474
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 515 NORTH FAIRVIEW
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Wilks
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
ZBA 55-V-92, 400 North Forest Avenue ZBA 55-V-92
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 400 FOREST
Page 5 - October 6, 1992
Page 6 October 6, 1992
would grant a variation to allow a five foot
separation between the principaland accessory
structure, rather than the required 10 feet, in order
to construct a two -car detached garage. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 5-0.-
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule :requiring two readings of. an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse,'Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Wilks
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4475
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4475
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400 FOREST AVENUE
Upon roll call,:Ayes,: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Wilks
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
ZBA 62-V-92
Z]BA 62-V-92, 50 South Emerson Street (Senior Center)
50 S.EMERSON
An ordinance was presented ;for first reading that
SENIOR CENTER
would grant variations to allow a maximum lot coverage
of 90.05%, rather than the permitted 75%, and to allow
39 parking spaces, rather than the required 55 spaces,
in order to construct a one-story addition to, the
existing building. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting the variations :requested rrby a
vote of 5-0,
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4476
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4476
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays; None
Motion carried,.
Trustee Corcoran left the meeting for a brief period
at this point.
SIGN REVIEW
SIGN CASE NO. 24-92, Charlie Club
CASE NO. 24-92
The Petitioner, Charlie club, is requesting an
AMEND CH. 7
amendment to Chapter 7 (Sign Code) by establishing a
Page 6 October 6, 1992
Special Use category for specific off -premise signs.
The Sign Review Board recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Sign
Review Board and grant the request in sign Review
Case No. 24-92
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at
the October 20th meeting.
Trustee Corcoran returned to the meeting at this
point.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 59-Z-92, ZBA 60 -SU -92 & ZBA 62-V-92, 805 Edgewood Lane
ZBA 59-Z-92,
The Petitioner is requesting the subject property
ZBA 60 -SU -92
be re -zoned from R -X to R-1 (Single Family Residential
& ZBA 61-V-92
District) and a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage
805 EDGEWOOD
and a variation to permit a driveway 3 feet wide,
tapering to 21 feet at the property line.
It was noted that the Petitioner has purchased an
existing home, will be demolishing that structure,
subdividing the property into two lots and will
construct two new single family homes.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the requests being the subject
of ZBA 59-Z-92, ZBA 60 -SU -92 and ZBA 61-V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes; Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Ordinances will be presented for first readings
at the October 20th meeting.
The following modifications from the Development
MODIFICATIONS
Code (Chapter 16) were also requested for
FROM
805 Edgewood: to waive the requirement to install
DEVELOPMENT
sidewalks, curb and gutters, street paving,
CODE
street lighting and required lot depth. The
Plan Commission had considered these requests
and recommended granting by a vote of 7-0.
It was noted that Edgewood is an unimproved road
without these improvements.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Plan
Commission and grant the modifications from the
Development Code as requested for 805 Edgewood.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks,
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - October 6, 1992
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at
the October 20th meeting of the village Board.
ZBA 63-V-92 ZBA 63-V-92, 1028 Beechwood
1028 BEECHWOOD The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a 27
foot wide driveway and lot coverage of 40%, rather
than the permitted 35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by a vote of 7-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 63-
V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Kays: None
Motion carried.
MODIFICATION Also requested for 1028 Beechwood is a modification
FROM DEVELOPMENT the Development Code (Chapter 16) to allow a driveway
CODE apron 27 feet in width, rather than the permitted 21
feet. The Plan Commission recommended granting this
request by'a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Plan Commission
and grant the modification from the Development Code
as requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
I-vr �-- I - .
RECESS
Mayor Farley called a brief recess at this point,
10:00 P.M.
Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 10:05 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Clowes,
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Floros
Trustee Hoefert
Trustee Wilks
Absent: Trustee Busse
ZBA 66 -SU -92
ZBA 66 -SU -92 and ZBA 67-V-92, 1430 Bonita
ZBA 67-V-92
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit a
1430 BONITA
driveway width of 261 811 and lot coverage of 48%,
rather than the permitted 45%. Also requested is a
Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests
by a vote of 7-0.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Page 8 - October 6, 1992
Appeals and grant the variations and Special
Use requested in ZBA 66-V-92 and ZBA 67 -SU -92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
on October 20th.
A request for a modification from the Development
MODIFICATION
Code was presented for 2016 East Euclid Avenue.
FROM
The Petitioner is requesting the requirement to
DEVELOPMENT
install sidewalks for this commercial property
CODE
under development. The Plan commission
recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
The Petitioner stated that there are no sidewalks
on either side of this property. It was the
consensus among the Board members that sidewalks
should be installed.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Plan
Commission to grant the modification from the
Development Code as requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes
Nays: Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert,
Wilks
Motion failed.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH. 21
would amend Chapter 21 (Building Code) authorizing
REFUND BOND
any deposit balance remaining with the Village to
MONIES
be forfeited following a required notification,
which forfeited amount will be deposited in the
General Fund of the Village.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved ORD.NO.4477
for passage of Ordinance No. 4477
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21 ENTITLED
"BUILDING CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 9 - October 6, 1992
SHED IN
Mrs. Gear noted that she arrived too late to
EASEMENT
speak under Citizens to be Heard and asked the Board
Hoefert', Wilks
what action the Village has taken relative to sheds in
Nays.:
the easement in her neighborhood, and whether the
Petitioner under a ZBA case has been notified to
remove an'illegal `concrete pad in his rear yard.
GVWR CAB & The following, bids were received for a
Village Manager Janonis stated that notifications were
CHASSIS GVWR truck cab and chassis:
given in all instances and copies of those letters
Bidder
would be provided to Mrs. Gear.
Amount
VILLAGE XANAGER08 REPORT
BID RESULTS:
Village Manager Michael E. Janonis presented bid
GMC Truck & Coach
results.
TELESCOPIC
The following 'bids were received for a 50 foot
AERIAL LIFT
aerial lift:
Northwest Ford; Truck
Bidder Model Amount
41,845.00
ITEC Versalift VN50MHI $43,917*
Power Equipment Elliot ECI350 59,546*
Elliot Equipment Elliot ECI350 68,310**
* with trade-in
** With no trade-in
It was noted that the bid submitted by ITEC did not
meet the specifications established by the Public
Works Department and provided to all bidders.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and reject all bids for the 50 foot
telescopic aerial lift.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to accept the bid submitted by Power Equipment in the
amount of $59,546, including trade-in, for the
purchase of a 50 foot telescopic aerial lift.
Upon roll call: Ayes:
Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros,
Hoefert', Wilks
Nays.:
None
Motion carried.
GVWR CAB & The following, bids were received for a
35,000 lb.
CHASSIS GVWR truck cab and chassis:
Bidder
Model
Amount
Freund Equipment
Int. 4900
$36,209.00
GMC Truck & Coach
TC7H042
36,357.75
Owen's International
Int. 4900
37,750.00
Northwest Ford; Truck
LN8000
41,845.00
Page 10 - October 6, 1992
It was noted that this cab and chassis is being
purchased in conjunction with the 50 foot
telescopic aerial lift, approved by the Board
in the preceding motion.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert,
FREUND EQUIP.
moved to accept the bid submitted by Freund
Equipment in the amount of $36,209.00 for the
purchase of a 35,000 GVWR cab and chassis.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for breathing
BREATHING
apparatus for the Fire Department based on
APPARATUS
5 MSA units:
Bidder Amount
Jefferson Fire & Safety $14,807.00
Air One 16,213.00
MSA 18,382.75
Interstate of Milwaukee 18,442.00
It was noted that correspondence had been received
from the low bidder, Jefferson Fire & Safety,
informing the Fire Department that they would not
be able to meet their bid, therefore it was the
recommendation of administration to reject bids
and authorize the purchase from Air One.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
AIR ONE
to reject the bids received for 5 MSA self-
containing breathing apparatus.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
to accept the bid received from Air One for the
purchase of 5 MSA self contained breathing apparatus
units for the Fire Department at a cost not to
exceed $16,213.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Floros, Hoefert,
Wilks
Nays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert requested information on the self
breathing apparatus as to how many old units are
yet to be replaced and the life expectancy of the
new units.
Bids were received by the State of Illinois
DEICING
for deicing chemicals as a multi -community bid.
CHEMICALS
Page 11 - October 6, 1992
Page 12 -.October 6, 1992
Based on the fact that this is the most cost effective
method of purchasing certain items, it was the
recommendation of staff that the bidding process be
waived and authorize the purchase of deicing chemicals
from North American Salt Company, in conjunction with
the State bidding process. It was noted that the
anticipated need for the season is 3,200 tons.
NORTH AMERICAN
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
SALT COMPANY
waive the bidding process and authorize the purchase
of deicing chemicals from North American Salt Company
at a cost not to exceed $22.86 per ton.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.,
Trustee Hoefert asked staff to examine is there are
environmental alternatives are available, rather than
salt.
SENIOR CENTER
It was noted that the existing boiler in the Senior
BOILER REPLACEMENT
Citizen Center has developed major leaks and staff
recommends replacing, the boiler and due to the fact
the winter season is almost upon us, it is requested
that the bidding procedure be waived and the Board
consider the following proposals received for the
boiler, replacement:
Bidder Hoedel. Amount
American Comfort Weil McLain LGB-8 $10,460
National Heat & Power Weil McLain LGB-8 10,580
Ibbotson Weil McLain LBG-8 10,900
AMERICAN COMFORT
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to waive the bidding procedure and authorize the
purchase of a "boiler for the Senior Citizen Center
from American Comfort Group at a cost not to exceed
$10,460,00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SANITARY/STORM
A request was presented from staff to authorize the
REPAIR/REPLACE
repair/replacement of the sanitary/storm sewer in the
500 BLOCK -
500 block of South Hi Lusi, due to a partial collapse.
SOUTH HI LUSI
Due to the unknown factors in this proposed project,
it was noted that preparing bin specifications would
be difficult, therefore, staff requests the Board
waive the bidding procedure and consider the following
proposals for this project:
Bidder Amount
National Sewer & Water, Inc. $ 9,820
Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete, Inc. 13,500
Rossetti Bros. Construction Co., Inc. 19,250
Vian Construction Co., Inc. 22,300
Page 12 -.October 6, 1992
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to waive the bidding process and authorize the
repair/replacement of the sanitary/storm sewer in
the 500 block of South Hi Lusi by National Sewer &
Water, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $9,820.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
It was noted that the elevated storage tank, located
in the central business district, is scheduled for
rehabilitation and in order to develop the
specifications, staff requests authorization for
Tank Industry Consultants, Inc, located in Speedway,
Indiana, to prepare the initial bid specifications.
It was noted that there are only two companies in the
country that are qualified in this area therefore
staff requests the bidding procedure be waived and
authorize be given to retain Tank Industry
Consultants, Inc. at a cost not to exceed $13,780.00.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to waive the bidding process and authorize Tank
Industry Consultants, Inc. to prepare the initial
bid specifications for the rehabilitation of the
downtown elevated tank in an amount not to exceed
$13,780.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert
Nays: Wilks
Motion carried.
Village Manager Janonis stated the recent
development of the Pate Subdivision, off Wildwood
Lane, required the Village to improve the roadway
and off-site improvements. No official action was
taken at that time to authorize the expenditure
involved with this improvement, which totalled
$43,422. Mr. Janonis also stated that he would
suggest the Board implement a rebate program,
which would require future home owners to rebate
a portion of this cost to the Village.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to ratify action taken in paying Mancini Construction
$29,522 and Accu -Paving $12,700.00 for the
improvements to Wildwood Lane.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would establish charges for a rebate for the
improvement of Wildwood Lane.
Page 13 - October 6, 1992
1UA40**Q0
ELEVATED
STORAGE TANK
TANK
INDUSTRY
CONSULTANTS
SUBDIVISION:
WILDWOOD LN
MANCINI
CONSTRUCTION
& ACCU-
PAVING
WILDWOOD
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
ordinance.
ORD.NO.4478 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
for passage of ordinance No. 4478
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING 'CHARGES FOR
THE INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER
SERVICES ON WILDWOOD LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ADDITION TO THE
SENIOR CITIZEN
Mr. Janonis stated that the staff would like to
CENTER
proceed with the addition to the Senior Citizen Center
PROJECT
as quickly as possible in an effort to 'begin the
project before the winter is upon us. He noted that
the Ordinance was passed earlier in the meeting
authorizing the necessary variations and in order to
go out for bid and meet the legal requirements for bid
notice, it would be necessary to advertise bids with
the first possible bid opening date of October 19th.
Due to that time factor, Mr. Janonis asked if the
Board would allow the bid results to be distributed
the day before the meeting. Members of the Board
approved this request.
CAN DOTA SEWER
Herb Weeks, Director of Public Works, gave a brief
PROJECT
update on the Can Dota sewer project, noting that the
contractor is meeting the time schedule established.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
POT HOLES
Trustee Clowes stated that there are several roadways,
both local as well as state and county, that need
repair and asked the Manager to provide a status
report.
DOWNTOWN
Richard Hendricks, 1537 East Emmerson Lane, asked for
REDEVELOPMENT
a status report on the proposed downtown redevelopment
plan.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Trustee Wilks,, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to go
into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing
Litigation.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran,Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Board went into Executive Session at 12:01 A.M.
Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 1:30 A.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Floros
Trustee Hoefert
Trustee Wilks
Page 14 - October 6, 1992
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
September 1, 1992 - September 30, 1992
Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
Fund
Balance
for
for
Balance
August 31.1992
September. 1992
September. 1992
Sent. 3011492
General and Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,733,415
$1,639,513
$1,244,497
$ 2,128,431
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
317,193
105,719
178,430
244,482
Community Development Block Grant
<10,797>
17,000
38,179
< 31,976>
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
< 128,620>
152,960
59,559
< 35,219>
Refuse Disposal Fund
<428,418>
433,276
226,233
< 221,375>
Ent§Wrise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,369,776
554,289
481,181
3,442,884
Parking System Revenue Fund
190,804
15,726
6,213
200,317
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,252,713
250,288
194,288
1,308,713
Vehicle Replacement Fund
926,084
2,827
17,014
911,897
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,423,363
154,925
19,154
1,559,134
Downtown Redev. Const. Funds
544,726
3,078
197
547,607
Police & Fire Building Construction
4,198,237
19,227
272,652
3,944,812
Flood Control Const. Fund
4,487,669
101,772
717,718
3,871,723
Debt Service Funds
935,199
398,582
-
1,333,781
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust
-
-
-
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
-
-
-
-
Police Pension Fund
17,843,581
185,655
74,822
17,954,414
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,772,066
388,408
88,118
20,072,356
Benefit Trust Funds
244.998
1.415
2,167
244.246
$56.671.9894�,,4,
4
$1,L20,42
$57,476,221
V I L L A G E O F N 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
GENERAL FUNDAMWNT
1,852,650.00
RECET YED
RECEIVED
A NBALANCE
78.38
TAX REVENUE
10,671,550.00
1,300,496.83
2,685,363.97
7,986,186.03
74.83
FEE REVENUE
1,833,000.00
75,586.88
1,183,140.26
649,859.74
35.45
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
21570,700.00
171,666.28
829,572.31
1,741,127.69
67.72
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
376,500.00
30,672.37
133,349.05
243,150.95
64.58
FINES AND FORFEITS
325,700.00
26,419.13
110,982.76
214,717.24
65.92
OTHER REVENUE
565,550.00
34,671,49
217,785,09
347,764.91
61.49
FUND TOTALS
161343,000.00
1 63�
55 1�
11 18 ,806,56
68,42 X
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
TAX REVENUE
760,950.00 152,958.38
TAX REVENUE
1,852,650.00
378,684.10
400,422.10
1,452,227.90
78.38
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
.00
.00
4,670.18
4,670.18-
.00
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
717,250.00
54,590.62
286,548.05
430,701.95
60.04
OTHER REVENUE
2,500.00
,61
342;94
2.157.06
$6.28
FUND TOTALS52�L,72,400_;QQ 433,275.33 691,983.27 1,880,416.73 73.09 X
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,047,500,00 104,262.04 376,064.72 671,435.28 64.09
OTHER REVENUE 50,1WQD1� �456.97 11.850.24 38,24,-9.76 76.34
FUND TOTALS 1,097,600.00 105;719.01 3$� 709,685,04 64.65 X
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 250,900.00 17,000.00 25,000,00 225,900.00 90.03
OTHER REVENUE 25 QOO.QO „00 2,,,7 306.72 2,306„72- 9,22 -
FUND TOTALS 7�00 17 000.00 52306.72 223,593.28 81.04 X
LL. MUNICIPAL ETI EMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE
760,950.00 152,958.38
161,738.80
599,211.20 78.74
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
55,000.00 .00
39,532.57
15,467.43 28.12
OTHER REVENUE
2,500.00 1.53
477.17
2,022.83 80.91
FUND TOTALS 818,450.00 152,959.91 201,748.94 616,701.46 75.34 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
BENEFIT TRUST #2 AMOUNT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE 18,500.00 1,406.13 7,253.33 11,246.67 60.79
FUND TOTALS 18,500.00 1,406.13 7,253.33 11,246.67 60.79 %
BENEFIT TRUST #3
OTHER REVENUE 9.29 49.96 49.96 .00
-
FUND TOTALS .00 9.29 49.96 49.96- 00 %
LIBRARY FUND
TAX REVENUE 2,220,425.00 DO .00 2,220,425:00 100.00
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 75,370.00 .00 DO 75,370.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 574,630.00 .00 ,00 574,630.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,870,425.00 .00 vOO 2,870,425.00 100.00 %
WATER & SEWER FUND
TAX REVENUE
1,357,900.00
94,747.13
112,952.39
1,244,947.61
91.68
FEE REVENUE
17,500.00
1,606.50
2,821.50
14,678.50
83.87
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
.00
19,373.00
19,373.00
19,373.00-
.00
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
4,437,500.00
419,925.36
2,142,169.59
2,295,330.41
51.72
OTHER REVENUE
„_„„665 ,,750,,0
10,636,39
97-740M
-55J-99U0
85.02
FUND TOTALS 6,465,650.00 554,288.38 2,375,057.28 4,090,592.72 63.26 %
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
FEE REVENUE
2,880.00
.00
960.00
1,920.00
66.66
PARKING REVENUE
177,500.00
15,467.41
73,337.70
104,162.30
58.68
FINES AND FORFEITS
.00
.00
82.50
82.50-
.00
OTHER REVENUE
12,Q.71
,, _ -0
W.0
Z, 58
3,186.24
8,813jo
73.44
FUND TOTALS 1921380100 15,726.12 77,566,44 114,013.56 59.68 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U N M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 2,092,000.00 216,310.53 849,732.93 1,242,267,07 59.38
OTHER REVENUE 426.500,00 33-976.91 187.227.72 2,39,27228 56.10
FUND TOTALSz , 515.5 250.287.44 I,Q36,%Q;65 1.481,539,35 58.82 %
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
627,600.00
.00
627,600.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
47,2QQ,00
2,827,34
18,437,37
29.062
61.18
FUND TOTALS
675,100.00
2,82738
646.037,37
29,062.63
4.30 %
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 2,092,000.00 216,310.53 849,732.93 1,242,267,07 59.38
OTHER REVENUE 426.500,00 33-976.91 187.227.72 2,39,27228 56.10
FUND TOTALSz , 515.5 250.287.44 I,Q36,%Q;65 1.481,539,35 58.82 %
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE
293,300.00
84,858.96
89,730.22
203,569.78
69.40
FEE REVENUE
120,000.00
11,187.34
44,746.02
75,253.98
62.71
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
990,000.00
48,324.68
239,902.19
750,097.81
75.76
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
425,000.00
.00
.00
425,000.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
266.500.00
19,554.18
92,810,58
173,689,42
65.17
FUND TOTALS 2, 094,800.5)R
154,925,16 467,109.01 1,627,610.99 77.69 %
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
OTHER REVENUE 199=0= 9985.6458,564,1641,435.84 41.43
FUND TOTALS 100,000.00 9,985.64 58,564.16 41,435�84 41.43 %
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
OTHER REVENUE 75,000,00 g,gil.03 61,120.05 13,879.95 18.50
FUND TOTALS 75,000.00 9.241.03 61.120.05 13,879,95 18.50 %
DOWNTOWN REDEYLPMT CONST 1985
FEE REVENUE 16,500.00 1,500.00 7,500.00 9,000.00 54.54
OTHER REVENUE 2,600,00 335*20 2,553.69 46.31 1.78
FUND TOTALS 191100.00 1.835.20 10.0531,69 9,04631 47.36 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 AMOUNT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE 101000.00 604.84 4�650.13 5J49.87 53.49
FUND TOTALS 10,000,00 604.041_3 5,349.87 53.49 %
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1992
OTHER REVENUE 10,000,00 637.61 � 6,552.05 65.52
FUND TOTALS . 10,000.00 637.61 3,447.95 6,552.05 65.52 %
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
TAX REVENUE 800,000.00 87,850.71 264,893.94 535,106.06 66.88
OTHER REVENUE 90,000-00 5,859.63 33,488.45 56,511.55 62.79
FUND TOTALS - 890,000,0093,710.34 22§ �382, 3,9 _221J17& 66.47 %
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992
OTHER REVENUE 50,000-00 8,060.56 I'll, 44,5W99 -- 5,461.01 10.92
FUND TOTALS
50,000,00
8,060.56
44,531.99
5,461.01
10.92 %
LORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1973
TAX REVENUE
136,650.00
30,494.33
32,244.94
104,405.16
76.40
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
4,100.00
.00
.00
4,100 00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
7,500.00
1§1.16
3,025.32
4,474.0
59.66
FUND TOTALS
148,250.00
30,855.49
35,270.16
112,979.84
76.20 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES 0 & 1 1974
TAX REVENUE
192,000.00
42,930.59
45,394.98
146,605.02
76.35
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
5,700.00
.00
.00
5,700.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
10,000,00
--------521 - 45
3,95E44
6,048.56 6,048.56
60.48
FUND TOTALS
207, 700,00
43,455.04
49.546,42
158,353.58
76.24 %
V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E 5 U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
SSA #2 BLACKHAWK B & I
TAX REVENUE 16,850.00 3,133,14 3,343.01 13,506.99 80.16
OTHER REVENUE 2.250M 132,53 724j0 11525.90 67.81
FUND TOTALS 19,100.00 3,265,67 4,067J1 15,032.89 78.70 %
PO CE & FIRE SLOG, 0, & I 1991A
TAX REVENUE 342,600,00 .00 .00 342,600.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 90090 .61 335,94 564,06 62.67
FUND TOTALS 343,5WOO .61 335.94 343,164.06 99.90 %
DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT 9 & 1 19918
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 32350M Do 15.868.75 16,881,25 51.54
FUND TOTALS 32,750 jo-D .99 15,860.75 51.54 %
FLOOD CONTROL 8 & 11991A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,500.00 J)o 871260.00 2$$,240M 76.76
FUND TOTALS 375.500.00 .DO $7,260.00 288,240.00 76.76 %
DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT a & 119870
TAX REVENUE 146,500.00 225,163.27 225,163.27 78,663.27- 53.69 -
OTHER REVENUE 10,009.00 278.51 1,739.97 8,260.13 82.60
FUND TOTALS 156,500.00 222,441,78 226,903.14 70,403.14- 44.98-%
BUDGET
CUR 140
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
S$A #1 PROSPECT M ADOWS 9 & I
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
TAX REVENUE
19,750.00
7,534.33
7,600.40
12,149.60
61.51
OTHER REVENUE
2,250.00
124,65
699.761,550.24
68.89
FUND TOTALS
22,Q-OQ.00
7,658.98
M 16
13,699,84
62.27 %
SSA #2 BLACKHAWK B & I
TAX REVENUE 16,850.00 3,133,14 3,343.01 13,506.99 80.16
OTHER REVENUE 2.250M 132,53 724j0 11525.90 67.81
FUND TOTALS 19,100.00 3,265,67 4,067J1 15,032.89 78.70 %
PO CE & FIRE SLOG, 0, & I 1991A
TAX REVENUE 342,600,00 .00 .00 342,600.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 90090 .61 335,94 564,06 62.67
FUND TOTALS 343,5WOO .61 335.94 343,164.06 99.90 %
DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT 9 & 1 19918
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 32350M Do 15.868.75 16,881,25 51.54
FUND TOTALS 32,750 jo-D .99 15,860.75 51.54 %
FLOOD CONTROL 8 & 11991A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375,500.00 J)o 871260.00 2$$,240M 76.76
FUND TOTALS 375.500.00 .DO $7,260.00 288,240.00 76.76 %
DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT a & 119870
TAX REVENUE 146,500.00 225,163.27 225,163.27 78,663.27- 53.69 -
OTHER REVENUE 10,009.00 278.51 1,739.97 8,260.13 82.60
FUND TOTALS 156,500.00 222,441,78 226,903.14 70,403.14- 44.98-%
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
P W FACILITY 8 & 1_12?70 BUDGET CUR "0 Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
-amou'"T RECETYED R.IVED --BALMCE BALANgE
TAX REVENUE 362,250.00 75,693.89 80,039.02 282,210.98 77.90
OTHER REVENUE 15,000.00 919, ____4918.47 44 6
. 8,0$1,53 53.87
FUND TOTALS 377,250.00 633.33 86,957.49 86,957.49 290,g22.51 76.94 %
DOWNTOWN R PMT 8& I 1987C
TAX REVENUE 78,500.00 .00 .00 78,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 115-00 .00 115,00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 78,615.00 -00 00 , 78,615,00 100.00 %
POLIO F PENSION FUND
TAX REVENUE 89,000.00 15,911.52 16,824.91 72,175.09 81.09
OTHER REVENUE 2,056,500.00 169.743.06 .." 758,742.63 1,297,757.37 63.10
FUND TOTALS --In,6-5-4 J-8 -M-5,07-54 . ..... 1,3912.46 63.85 %
F,IREMgN'S PENSION FUN
TAX REVENUE 38,000.00 6,152.37 6,505.55 31,494.45 82.88
OTHER REVENUE 2,272,000.00 X555.57_ 1,01,296.10 1_183,703.90 52.09
FUND TOTALS 2, 310,Q00.00 398,407.94 1,215,198.35 52.60 %
CAPITAL IMPROYMENT 6 & I 199
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 64,500.00 .00 .00 64,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 100.00 8.59 52.79 . ..... 47.21 47.21
FUND TOTALS -64,6,W.0
, , -0 8.59 52.79 -11,11.1, 64,547.21 99.91 %
FLOOD CONTROL 8 4 1, 1 MA
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 110,300.00 .00 .00 110,300.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE . ...... . . 200.00 16,23 94.16 105.84 52.92
FUND TOTALS . .. .... 1I0,5,00.00 16.23 94.16 110-405,84 99.91 %
SSA #6 GEORGE ALBERT a & I
TAX REVENUE 32,300.00 11,197.79 11.4105.02 20,894.98 64.69
OTHER REVENUE 1,0WOO 46,07 279.62 720,38 72.03
FUND TOTALS 33 30,0100, 11,243,86 11,684,6
, 4 21,615.36 64.91 %
TOTALS ALL FUNDS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
13,981,536.66
29,549,983.34
67.88 %
LESS TRANSFERS
8 U D G E T R E V E
N U E S U
M M A R Y
914,571.g5-
89.86 %
TOTAL REVENUES
5/01/92
- 9/30/92
13,878.Q7,91
28.635,412.09
67.35 %
BUDGET
CUR 140
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & 1 19928
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
SAVL
SA ANCE,
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
9,650.00
.00
J)o
9,650.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
M
1.52
8.38
8.38-
.00
FUND TOTALS
9,650.00
1.52
8.38
9,641.62
99.91 %
SSA #6 GEORGE ALBERT a & I
TAX REVENUE 32,300.00 11,197.79 11.4105.02 20,894.98 64.69
OTHER REVENUE 1,0WOO 46,07 279.62 720,38 72.03
FUND TOTALS 33 30,0100, 11,243,86 11,684,6
, 4 21,615.36 64.91 %
TOTALS ALL FUNDS
43,531,520.00
4,424,655.97
13,981,536.66
29,549,983.34
67.88 %
LESS TRANSFERS
1,0173QQ.0 0-
.09
1p3.128.75-
914,571.g5-
89.86 %
TOTAL REVENUES
42M3,820.00
4,424.655,97
13,878.Q7,91
28.635,412.09
67.35 %
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
V I L L A G E 0 F
M 0 U N T P
R 0 S P E C T
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PERSONAL SERVICES
56,930.00
8 U D G E T E X P E
N D I T U R E
S U M M A R Y
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,469,700.00
221,964.93
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
1,611,805.42 65.26
COMMODITIES
17,500.00
24.65
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
PERSONAL SERVICES
11,553,510.00
856,745.92
4,317,369.86
7,236,140.14
62.63
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,862,325.00
302,957.62
1,570,429.37
2,291,895.63
59.33
COMMODITIES
796,415.00
71,751.62
250,968.41
545,446.59
68.48
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
229,855.DO
12,147.82
24,012.29
205,842.71
89.55
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
21,795.00
.00
21,280.60
514.40
2.36
PENSION EXPENSE
10, 600, 00
R322
4,416.10
6,183..90
58.33
FUND TOTALS
16,474,500,00
1,244,486,20
6,188,47&63
10,286,023.37
62.43 %
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
PERSONAL SERVICES
56,930.00
4,243.42
20,521.83
36,408.17 63.95
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,469,700.00
221,964.93
857,894.58
1,611,805.42 65.26
COMMODITIES
17,500.00
24.65
5,604.49
11,895.51 67.97
FUND TOTALS 2,544,130,00 --226a-32A0 894,020,90 1 16W 109. 10 65.25 Z
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
66,000.00
15,533.12 36,107.50
29,892.50 45.29
COMMODITIES
75,000.00
.00 .00
75,000.00 100.00
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
11007,500-00
162-897.73 67.6,222.71
�31,g70.49 32.98
FUND TOTALS 1,lg,500.00 1M430.85 712,337.21 436J62,79 37.97 %
COMMUNITY DEVT BLOCK. GRANT
PERSONAL SERVICES
46,750.00
3,106.86
14,786.59
31,963.41
68.37
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
42,850.00
6,096.61
10,274.52
32,575.48
76.02
COMMODITIES
1,200,00
.DO
46.99
1,153.01
96.08
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
185,100,00
28.976„00
52,175.50
125,924.50
68.03
FUND TOTALS275,9W-0 ,179.47
O 84,2§3�60 191.616,40 69.45 %
38
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 782,835.00 59,558.41 297,138.68 495-626,32 62.04
FUND TOTALS 782,835,00 59,558,41 297,138.68 485.696,32 62.04 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U 0 G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
BUDGETCUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
BENEFIT TRUST #2 AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
PENSION EXPENSE 26,000.00 2,166.83 10,834.1515,165.85 58.33
FUND TOTALS26,000.00 2,166.83 10,834.15 15,165.85 58.33 %
LIBRARY FUND
LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2,870,425.00 Do .Oa 2,870,425.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,870,425.00 .00 .00 2,,,870,425.00 100.00 %
WATER & SEWER FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,250,230.00
91,172.24
468,522.05
781,707.95
62.52
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,045,700.00
336,296.76
1,638,873.80
2,406,826.20
59.49
COMMODITIES
351,200.00
28,754.14
142,327.65
208,872.35
59.47
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
3961800.00
24,956.10
70,233.87
326,566.13
$2.29
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
601,925,00
.00
66,094.34
535,830.66
89.01
FUND TOTALS 6,645,655.00 481. 79,24 2.38b,051.71 4,2WS03.29 64.09 %
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES
24,110.00
1,803.83 8,956.95
15,153.05
62.84
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
62,900.00
4,205.24 27,926.12
34,973.88
55.60
COMMODITIES
5,800.00
204.69 1,182.01
4,617.99
79.62
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
111000.00
.00 10,464.74
535.2§
4.86
FUND TOTALS . 103,810.00 6,213J6 48,529.82 55,280.18 53.25 %
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 583,415,00 17„014.03 194,790,81 38$,624.19 66.61
FUND TOTALS 58L415.00 17,014.03 194,790.81 588,624,19 66.61 %
RISK MANAGE14ENT FUND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,512,OW.00 194,289.21 762,390.47 1,749,6
--Q9
__ 5
3 69.65
FUND TOTALS 2,512,000.00 194,288.21 762,390.47 1,749,6D9.53 69.65 %
V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
B U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
P2LICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,830,285.00 .00 .00 1,830,285.00 100.00
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 425,0=00 ..DO .00 425,000.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,255,285.00 00 .00
2,255,285= 100.00 %
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEED$,
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,122,215.00 27,,,,'2,652.40 1,354j§§.18 768,026,,62 36.18
FUND TOTALS 2,122,215.gQ 272,652,40 1,354,188.18 768,026.82 36.18 %
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 250,000.00 196.87 2,787.59 247,212.41 98.88
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 32350,00 00 15-068,75 1¢.881.25 51.54
FUND TOTALS 2750,00 196.87 18,656_3,4 264,093.66 93.40 %
DOWNTOWN R V.PMT CONST 1992
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,650,00 9.650.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 9,650,00 -99 9,630.00 100.00 %
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80,000.00 .00 1,895.40 78,104.60 97.63
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 390,000.00 47,829.66 205,409.27 184,590.73 47.33
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 485,800.00 .00 87.260.00 398-540,00 82.03
FUND TOTALS 955,800.00 47829,66 294,5" .67 661,235.33 69.18 %
BUDGET
CUR 140
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
498,500.00
567.05
486,148.05
12,351.95
2.47
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1,310,960.00
18,571.65
101,671.25
1,209,288.75
92.24
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
64.500A
,00
.00
§4, 500. W
100.00
FUND TOTALS
1,873,960,00
19J38.70
587,819,30
„L3"_1 & 79
68.63 %
P2LICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,830,285.00 .00 .00 1,830,285.00 100.00
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 425,0=00 ..DO .00 425,000.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,255,285.00 00 .00
2,255,285= 100.00 %
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEED$,
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,122,215.00 27,,,,'2,652.40 1,354j§§.18 768,026,,62 36.18
FUND TOTALS 2,122,215.gQ 272,652,40 1,354,188.18 768,026.82 36.18 %
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 250,000.00 196.87 2,787.59 247,212.41 98.88
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 32350,00 00 15-068,75 1¢.881.25 51.54
FUND TOTALS 2750,00 196.87 18,656_3,4 264,093.66 93.40 %
DOWNTOWN R V.PMT CONST 1992
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,650,00 9.650.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 9,650,00 -99 9,630.00 100.00 %
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80,000.00 .00 1,895.40 78,104.60 97.63
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 390,000.00 47,829.66 205,409.27 184,590.73 47.33
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 485,800.00 .00 87.260.00 398-540,00 82.03
FUND TOTALS 955,800.00 47829,66 294,5" .67 661,235.33 69.18 %
V I L L A G S 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992 AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,850,000.00 669,887.82 902,358.72 2,947,641.28 76.56
FUND TOTALS 3,850,000.00 669,887.82 902,358.72 2,947,641.28 76.56 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1973
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 166,500.00 .00 10,850.42 155,649.58 93.48
FUND TOTALS 166,500.QQ .00 10,850,42 15�.649.58 93.48 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1974
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 24, 400.00 .00 22,624.00 222,776.00 90.78
FUND TOTALS 245,400.00 00 22,624,00 222376,00 90.78
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS 8 & I
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2 470.00 .00 4,2,35.00 81.15
FUND TOTALS 22,470.00 .00 4,235.00 18,235.00 81.15 %
SSA Q. 868CKHAWK 8 & I
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE Al 800.00 pp 2,900 -go --!L—go—om- 90.58
FUND TOTALS 1 30, BOO. DO .00 2,m --O0 27,900.00 90.58 %
POLICE & FIRE BL99 8 & I 1991A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 244,455.00 .00 122,016.90 122,438.10 50.08
FUND TOTALS 244,455.00 DQ 122,016.90 122,438.10 50.08 %
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 0 & 11991
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 3 99 1636
4.75 16,381.25 50.01
FUND TOTALS 32,750.0,0 .00 16,368.75 W381.25 50.01 %
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
FLOOD CONTROL B & 11991A AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 375,100M QQ 87,469.35 7p,�M,30165 76.70
FUND TOTALS 375,a QO 8 288,030.65 76.70 X
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 19870
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 114..375..00 .00 ,......:7,4W25._ 56,x,9 8.75... 49.78
FUND TOTALS 114 375..00.. 00, 97.436.25 56,938.75 49.78 X
P W FACILITY 8 & 119878
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 43.4.130,00. ,00 895 D7.54 344,622,46 79.38
FUND TOTALS .,,_434.130.00 .00 89,507.54 „-„-;3,,44,, 22.46.. 79.38 X
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1987C
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 781615.00 .00 11,07._50 66,807,50_ 84.98
FUND TOTALS 78,615,00 Do 11,807,50 66,807,50 84.98 X
POLICE PENSION FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 333,500.00 33,350.00 133,400.00 200,100.00 60.00
PENSION EXPENSE 568... 41;471.80 215.057.10 3,52,942.90_ 62.13
FUND TOTALS �901,500.OQ_ 74,1%21,80 348,457,10 553,042-90_ 61.34 X
FIREMEN'$ PENSION FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 410,000.00 41,000.00 164,000.00 246,000.00 60.00
PENSION EXPENSE 605,000.00 47,117.53 240,196...10 364,803.90 60.29
FUND TOTALS 1 0_ 1,5,,000.gg, 88.117,53 404,196,10 610.803.90 60.17 X
CAPITAL IMPROVM NT 8 & I 149
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 68,500.00 ,00 506.1?67.993.88 99.26
FUND TOTALS 68,900,00 .DO 506,12 67 993.88 99.26 X
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 9/30/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
FLOOD CONTROL 8 & I 1992A AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 118.500.00 M, $46.05 117,653,95 99.28
FUND TOTALS 118.500.00 .00 846.05 117 ,653.95 99.28 X
DOWNTOWN
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 10,250,00 00 _ Do75 8.92 9.671.08 94.35
FUND TOTALS 10.250.00 00 578.92 9.671.08 94.35 X
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 33.b50...00_. .00.. ...11,823.75 26,,,2„5 64.86
FUND TOTALS 33,650, - 00, Do 11.823.75 21 826.25 64.86 %
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 49.209.425.00 3.620,394,78 15.918.064.94, 33,2M360.06 67.65 X
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
October 15, 1992
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
10/1/92 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
_10/1192
10/15/92
List of Bills
Entry 10/15/92
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 2,204,315
$1,883,368
$1,291,950
$ 2,795,733
Refuse Disposal Fund
221,388
561,377
5,016
777,749
Motor Fuel Tax
343,506
83,682
147,818
279,370
Community Development Block Grant Fund
347
31,000
29,901
1,446
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
166,766
221,027
214,498
173,295
Enlmrise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,245,962
662,175
419,399
3,488,738
Parking System Revenue Fund
204,949
5,893
5,763
205,079
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,173,168
17,378
78,672
1,111,874
Vehicle Replacement Fund
908,319
672
113,460
795,531
Capital Project
Capital Improvement Fund
1,566,569
130,148
22,062
1,674,655
Downtown Redev Const Funds
554,526
3,076
34
557,568
Police & Fire Building Construction
3,869,432
4,278
308,489
3,565,221
Flood Control Construction Fund
3,888,002
88,547
867,400
3,109,149
Debt Service Funds
1,306,139
339,997
0
1,646,136
Trust & Agency unds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
13,689
4,578
5,375
12,892
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,293,027
15,362
20,570
1,287,819
Police Pension Fund
17,858,665
45,523
0
17,904,188
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,996,726
47,969
0
20,044,695
Benefit Trust Funds
240.078
jo
2.167
238.014
7$4,146,111
13,° 2574
-0- 112,669,152
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AAH-HA WEIDNER
C11832 AAH-HA WEIDNERS
$100.00
$100.00
ABC PLUMBING
C11673 ABC PLBG
$100.00
$100.00
AIROOM INC.
C11119 AIROOM INC
$25.00
$25.00
AMERICA'S BEST CAR WASH
1621 AMERICAS BEST CAR WASH
$100.00
1622 AMERICAS BEST CAR WASH
$100.00
$200.00
ANALYTICS
C6730 KAUFMAN LARRY
$100.00
$100.00
ARCHADECK OF LAKE COOK
C11732 ARCHADECK
$75.00
$75.00
BIG RIGG CONSTRUCTION
C11659 BIG RIGG CONST
$500.00
$500.00
MATTHEW J. CANNING
REPL CK 65039PR
$495.84
$495.84*
CB COMMERCIAL
1598 CB COMMERCIAL
$100.00
$100.00
CHICAGO SIGN DESIGN, INC.
1585 CHICAGO SIGN DESIGN
$100.00
$100.00
CITIBANK, N.A.
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS-GAB
$1,214.72
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS-GAB
$2,111.00
INSURANCE CLAIMS
$1,347.52
$4,673.24*
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PMT-PR 10/15/92
$224.25
PAYMENT PR 10/01
$224.25
$448.50*
MRS. COLLETTI
C11664 COLLETTI
$75.00
$75.00
CUSTOM DESIGN CREATIONS
C11609 CUSTOM DESIGN
$100.00
$100.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCT
P/R ENDING 10/01/92
$404,380.94
P/R ENDING 10/01/92
$1,265.03
P1R ENDING 10/01/92
$758.70
P1R ENDING 10101/92
$37,058.87
P/R ENDING 10101/92
$2,330.39
P/R ENDING 10/15192
$418,549.25
P1R ENDING 10/15192
$1,670.84
P/R ENDING 10/15/92
$1,329.81
P1R ENDING 10J/15
$758.70
%192
ING 2BILL
$36,5.23
$904,629.76*
DONALD DOMBROWSKI
REFUNDDFINALOWATER
$1.00
$1
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$10.00
$11.00
ADAM EWERT
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$18.00
$18.00
BRUCE FISHER
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$15.00
$16.50
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
SEPT 92 MED BENEFIT REIMB
$5,375.35
$5,375.35*
MARIO GAMBINO LANDSCAPING INC
C11207 GAMBINO
$100.00
$100.00
EMANUEL GORDON
REFUND RE TR TAX STAMP
$285.00
$285.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10415492
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
HARAS CONSTRUCTION
C11034 HARAS CONST
$100.00
$100.00
GARY HENGSTLER
C6986 HENGSTLER GARY
$75.00
$75.00
JANET HERTZ
C11548 HERTZ, JANET
$35.00
$35.00
JOHN HOGAN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.50
REFUND FINAL BILL
$.25
$2.75
RIK L. HOLMES
C11796 HOLMESWRIKR
$35.00
$35.00
HUGO, WILLIAM
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$31.08
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$3.11
$34.19
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
342-50-6577 LEVY PROCEEDS
$62.15
$62.15
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
EMPLOYEE SHARE SEPT 92
$18,137.71
EMPLOYER SHARE SEPT 92
$45,505.27
$63,642.98*
CARL RICHARD JESSEN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.25
$2.75
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT PR 10415%92
PAYMENT
$254.00
PR 10401
$254.00
$508.00*
STEVEN KAMPSCHROER
REFUND FINAL ATER BILL
$12.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.25
$13.75
YONG W. KANG
REFUND STICKER PURCHASE
$40.00
$40.00
ALFRED R. LASALLE
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
$404.00
$404.00
FRANCIS LINKER
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$5.00
REFUND BILL
$.50
$5.50
M & S CONSTRUCTION
C11397 M&SACONSTER
$500.00
C11608 M&S CONST
$ 00
$1, .00
MALNATI ORGANIZATION INC.
REFUND OVERPAYMENT
$75 .00
$75.
75 .00
$75
$
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
C11393 MARATHON OIL
$500.00
$500.00
MOUNT PROSPECT 75TH ANNIV.COMM
43 -75TH TAPES
$215.00
$215.00
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
SAVINGS BONDS PR 10415492
$500.00
SAVINGS BONDS PR 10/01
$500.00
DUE TO FED DEF PR 1 Z2
$1,377.23
DUE TO FED DEP PR 1042
$160.43
DUE TO FED DEP PR 1442
$95.65
DUE TO FED DEP PR 1042
$10,855.30
DUE TO FED DEP PR 1042
$2,705.50
DUE TO FED DEP PR 1042
$57.54
$16,251.65*
NORTH WEST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP
SERVICES RENDERED
$625.00
$625.00
NORTHERN REFLECTIONS INC.
OVERPMT BUSINESS LICENSE
$37.50
$37.50
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
MICHAEL O'MALLEY
OLD ORCHARD C. C. VILLAGE
OTIS ELEVATOR
PAR 4 BUILDERS
PECK/JONES CONSTRUCTION
MIKE PHILLIPPI
RICH POORE
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTMASTER
R. ESDORN EXTERIORS
RAC CORP.
PAUL RUPPRECHT
FRANK RUSSO
OTTO SEMROW
PAUL SKORDILIS
HOYT B. SMITH
SPACE HOME IMPROVEMENT
TIMOTHY SULLIVAN
MARICE L. TEITEL
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
GRZEGORZ TUROWSKI
BRUNO ULASZEK
ULLRICH, MAX F
R. J. VAUGHAN
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 14/15/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C11830
OMALLEY MICHAEL
$100.00
C9568
OMALLEY MICHAEL
$70.00
C9568
OMALLEY MICHAEL
$20.00
$190.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$52.50
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$5.25
$57.75
C9322
OTIS ELEVATOR
$100.00
$100.00
C9463
PAR 4 BLDRS
$425.00
$425.00
C10334
PECK JONES
$100.00
C11594
PECK JONES
$100.00
C11711
PECK JONES
$100.00
$300.00
C9286
PHILLIPPI MIKE
$100.00
$100.00
C11146
POORE RICH
$100.00
$100.00
POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT
$3,000.00
$3,000.00*
POSTAGE STAMPS
$580.00
$580.00*
C11717
R ESDORN EXT
$35.00
$35.00
C11546
RAC CORP
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$.25
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$2.50
$2.75
C10702
RUSSO, FRANK
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$2.20
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$.17
$2.37
C11828
SKORDILIS
$35.00
$35.00
C11815
SMITH HOYT B.
$100.00
$100.00
C10645
SPACE HOME
$75.00
$75.00
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
$436.00
$436.00
REFUND
DUPLICATE STICKER
$40.00
$40.00
OCT 1 BOND MONEY
$1,580.00
OCT 2 BOND MONEY
$1,175.00
OCT 3 BOND MONEY
$3,095.00
$5,850.00*
REFUND
DUP STICKER PURCHASE
$40.00
$40.00
C10115
ULASZEK
$25.00
C10115
ULASZEK
$100.00
$125.00
C11674
ULLRICH MAX
$35.00
$35.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$1.75
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$17.50
$19.25
TR TO POLICE PENSION FUND
$15,911.52
$15,911.52
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
C10645 SPACE HOME IMP
$25.00
C11119 AIROOM INC
$75.00
C11664 COLLETTI
$25.00
C11732 ARCHADECK LAKE COOK
$25.00
C6986 HENGSTLER
$25.00
C9286 PHILLIPPS
$50.00
C9393 BUILDING OPTIONS
$100.00
C9463 PAR 4 BUILDERS
$75.00
911007 BUILDING OPTIONS
$100.00
$500.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$4,993.78
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$2,000.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$25,917.81
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$135,000.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$100,000.00
TR TO RISK MANAGEMENT
$490.00
TR TO RISK MANAGEMENT
$26,750.00
TR TO RISK MANAGEMENT
$500.00
TR TO REFUSE DISPOSAL
$5,000.00
TR TO RISK MANAGEMENT
$348,320.00
$648,971.59
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TRANS TO IMRF FUND
$768.79
TRANS TO IMRF FUND
$285.43
TRANS TO IMRF FUND
$8,583.52
TRANS TO IMRF FUND
$171.30
TRANS TO IMRF FUND
$364.60
$10,173.64
VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT FIRE PE
TR TO FIRE PENSION FUND
$6,152.37
$6,152.37
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
MICROFILMING SERVICES
$207.54
$207.54
WOLF POINT REALTY
920917 WOLF POINT
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$1,696,958.19
GENERAL FUND
$1,201,266.48 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$5,016.26
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$100,000.00 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$3,600.92
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$214,498.28 WATER & SEWER FUND
$137,711.49
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$4,246.24 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$4,673.24
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%1592
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $5,375.35 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $20,569.93
*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
SWEET ROLLS 75TH ANN COMM
$5.40
$5.40
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$74.82
MISC EXPENSES
$10.00
$84.82*
SCHWEPPE & SONS
COFFEE
$68.88
$68.88
V & G PRINTERS INC.
BUSINESS CARDS
$890.00
$890.00
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$1,049.10
GENERAL FUND $1,049.10
*xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*xx**xxxxxx
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
DAILY HERALD
SUBSCRIPTIONS
$161.20
$161.20
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
PHYSICAL-CHLYSTEK
$200.00
PHYSICAL-CHLYSTEK
$30.00
$230.00
ICMA
2 BOOKS
$47.50
$47.50
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$41.27
$41.27
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$21-25
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$85.00
LEGAL
$243
$349.28
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISCSEXPENSESSERVICES
$18.03
.18
MISC EXPENSES
$25.00$43.18*
$$6.25
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$6.25
$6
BARRY A. SPRINGER
LEGAL SERVICES
$1,485.00
$1,485.00
XEROX CORPORATION
1048 COPIER MICE
$342.97
$342.97
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$2,706.65
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $2,706.65
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AT&T
016 089 7465 001
$482.24
$482.24
COMP USA
SOFTWARE
$426.00
$426.00
DEWOLFE MUSIC LIBRARY
4 COMPACT DISKS
$88.00
ANNUAL MUSIC LICENSE
$700.00
$788.00
DAILY HERALD
SUBSCRIPTIONS
$161.20
$161.20
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$2,301.17
SERVICE
$50.00
$2,351.17
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$25.59
MISC EXPENSES
$6.50
MISC EXPENSES
$46.37
$78.46*
APRIL RAJCZYK
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
JERRY RAJCZYK
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
JONNA SHOUB
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$4,362.07
GENERAL FUND
$4,362.07
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
THE DRAWING BOARD
ENVELOPES$160.45
$160.45
FINANCIAL AND ECON. STRAT.CORP
CONSULTING SERVICES
$750.00
$750.00
I.B.M. CORPORATION - BC5
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$21.00
$215.00
METRO EXPRESS, INC.
DELIVERY
$18.90
DELIVERY
$23.10
DELIVERY
$12.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%1592
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PITNEY BOWES INC.
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
SKLODOWSKI, FRANKLIN,PUCHALSKI
TRACS
XEROX CORPORATION
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
DELIVERY
DELIVERY
CITIZENS SURVEY ASSISTANCE
TR TAX TRANS SEPT 92
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
SOFTGUARD MICE AGREEMENT
POSTAGE RESET CHARGES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
FF PENSION TRUSTEE HANDBOOK
OCTOBER CONNECT FEE
1048 COPIER MICE
1090 COPIER CHARGES
DEVELOPER
$5,552.59
INVOICE AMOUNT
$18.90
$22.25
$175.00
$270.00
$17.36
$9.05
$140.00
$214.50
$69.57
$35.00
$50.00
$542.93
$2,556.08
$252.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 7
TOTAL
$95.65
$175.00
$270.00
*
$26.41*
$354.50
$69.57
$35.00
$50.00
$3,351.01
$5,552.59
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
ELEK-TEK, INC.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
PACKARD BELL FORCE 333DX
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$1,327.43
$1,055.00 $1,055.00
$272.43 $272.43
***TOTAL** $1,327.43
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$80.00
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$80.00
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
$80.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
SERVICES
$260.00
$560.00
BROOKFIELD
OCTOBER ADMIN FEES
$4,322.53
$180.00
CADSTATION
OCT EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM
$10,371.05
$520.00
COMP USA
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 10/5
$39,718.82
$329,00
MED. CLAIMS THRU 10/9
$15,294.99
$69,707.39*
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
OCTOBER SERVICE FEES
$886.00
$886.00
JACK D. KEYSER, D.C.
SVCS-A.BROUSSEAU
$731.00
$731.00
KNIGHT,HOPPE,FANNING&KNIGHT,LT
LEGAL SERVICES
$509.00
$509.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SVCS 9002163826-X
$185.00
$185.00
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
SERVICES KEVIN GROAT
$12.50
$12.50
RISK RESOURCES
r RISK MGMT SERVICES
$500.00
$500.00
SPORT
SERVICES-M.WERNER
$161.00
$406.00
$567.00
Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE
P14VBODY REPAIRS
$175.00
P4 REPAIRS
$50
$50.00
P10 BODY REPAIRS
$270.50
P3 BODY REPAIRS
$289.90
P12 BODY REPAIRS
$115.20
$900.60
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
***TOTAL**
$73,998.49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$73,998.49
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
SERVICES RENDERED
$80.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$80.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$80.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$60.00
SERVICES
$260.00
$560.00
BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC.
MEMBERSHIPENDERED RENEWAL
$18000
$180.00
CADSTATION
AUTOCAD UPGRADE
$520..00
$520.00
COMP USA
SUPPLIES
$329.00
$329,00
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$11.22
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$198.65
$209.87
JOHN DAHLBERG
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
$300.29
$300.29
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
T-SHIRTS
$643.75
MICHAEL FRONTZAK
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$175.00
$175.00
GLOBAL COMPUTER SUPPLIES
PC WORKSTATION
$176.48
$176.48
GREGORY G. GRAHAM
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$53.22
$53.22
DAILY HERALD
SUBSCRIPTIONS
$161.20
$161.20
IAFSM
WORKSHOP-WULBECKER
$25.00
$25.00
FRANK KRUPA
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$40.69$40.69
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$35.88
$35.88
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$68.00
MISC EXPENSES
$21.90
MISC EXPENSES
$9.06
MISC EXPENSES
$27.40
MISC EXPENSES
$30.63
MISC EXPENSES
$7.27
MISC EXPENSES
$5.00
$169.26*
STATE OF ILLINOIS
LICENSE-TENNYSON
$40.00
$40.00
FREDRIC TENNYSON
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$33.01
$33.01
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
RE -INSPECT ELEVATOR
$27.00
$27.00
XEROX CORPORATION
MICE AGREEMENT 2510 COPIER
$176.23
MTCE AGREEMENT 1035 COPIER
$193.17
1048 COPIER MTCE
$542.93
$912.33
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$3,438.07
GENERAL FUND
$3,438.07
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$11.22
PARTS
$198.65
$209.87
JOHN DAHLBERG
EXPENSES
$300.29
$300.29
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
FAX PAPER
$84.00
$84.00
BRIAN R. DONEY
T-SHIRTS
$643.75
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
$.75
287
$1,.50*
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
MTCEIRTS
SUPPLIES
$19
$14.98
$19.9$
$19
EMPLOYEE DATA FORMS, INC.
CALENDARS
$36.75
$36.75
JOSEPH FAVIA
EXPENSES
$24.00
$24.00
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$34.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$34.00
$117.00
HEROLD ADVERTISING CO.
MCGRUFF COLORING BOOKS
$283.98
$283.98
ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF
PAVLOCK/DALEY/RICHARDSON
$275.00
$275.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$27.08
SERVICE
$100.00
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$19.52
SERVICE
$24.10
$470.70
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$24.95
$24.95
MAUREEN KERRIGAN
EXPENSES
$29.65
$29.65
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$57.56
CREDIT
$9.60-
$47.96
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$88.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$33.31
$121.31
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
TACTICAL UNIT CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.00
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
HANDBOOKS
$35.28
$35.28
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$5.40
MISC EXPENSES
$231.87
MISC EXPENSES
$38.47
MISC
$23.50
$299.24*
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVELX&ENSES SUPPLIES
0
$.$0
ERIC E. PIEE
MTCE & RADIO REPAIRS
$2933..550
MTCE & RADIO REPAIRS
$1,530.00
$1,823.50
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$70.77
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$70.77
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$70.77
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$70.80
$283.11
QUALEX, INC.
CONTACT SHEETS
$31.18
$31.18
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$18.20
PARTS
$240.72
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ABLE FIRE SAFETY EQUIP
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$212.00
PAGE 11
ANDY BROUSEAU
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$30.00
$30.00
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
PAYMENT DATE 10115192
$31.00
$31.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
070 0057060 0
$182.86
$182.86
CHARTERHOUSE PUBLISHING CO.
PARTS
$205.96
$24.73
CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC.
PARTS
$187.76
$152.00
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
PARTS
$162.00
$814.64
WILLIAM ROSCOP
REIMB COMPUTER CLASS
$66.00
$66.00
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
DELINQUENT NOTICES
$245.69
$60.00
STEVEN DUMOVICH
ENVELOPES
$70.00
$315.69
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TUITION STEINERILEONARD
$550.00
$550.00
U-TECK
BARRICADE TAPE
$137.88
$137.88
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
AUG 92 MICE/PRISONER FOOD
$84.10
$84.10
JOHN R. WAGNER
REIMB COMPUTER CLASS
$63.00
$63.00
WICKLANDER-ZULAWSKI & ASSOC.
TUITION FAVIAIBONNER
$480.00
$480.00
WIPECO INC
POLO RAGS
$200.00
$200.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$8,617.36
GENERAL FUND
$8,617.36
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ABLE FIRE SAFETY EQUIP
HOSE & 2 RELIEF VALVES
$212.00
$212.00
ANDY BROUSEAU
EXPENSES
$30.00
$30.00
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
FLOWERS -HART
$31.00
$31.00
EDWARD CAVELLO
EXPENSES
$268.00
$268.00
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
070 0057060 0
$182.86
$182.86
CHARTERHOUSE PUBLISHING CO.
TIME & PAY RECORDS
$24.73
$24.73
CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$152.00
$152.00
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
SUBSCRIPTION
$33.15
$33.15
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BA77-JT-2404-A
$8.44
$8.44
HENRY DAWSON
EXPENSES
$60.00
$60.00
STEVEN DUMOVICH
EXPENSES
$45.00
$45.00
FIRE DEPT. SAFETY OFCRS. ASSN.
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$60.00
$60.00
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
REPAIR PARTS
$7.25
$7.25
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
FIRE ENGINEERING
HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY
ARTHUR L. HART, JR.
DAILY HERALD
I R AIR CENTERS
IDEAS UNLIMITED
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOC
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
KEVIN'S DES PLAINES AUTO SALV.
GARY KLEIN
KREST UNIFORMS, INC.
ALAN LABBE
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LIQUID AIR CORPORATION
CHARLES LIVINGSTON
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
M & R RADIATOR INC.
MICROSOFT
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
MOTOROLA, INC.
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUBSCRIPTION
PAINT SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
SUBSCRIPTIONS
BREATHING AIR PARTS
SUBSCRIPTION
SERVICE
SERVICE
REGISTER CAVELLO%DUMOVICH
DUES CAVELLO/JACKSON
SEMINAR KUEKING/ESCONDO
SUPPLIES
RETURN POSTAGE
SUPPLY AUTOS
EXPENSES
ALTER 21 TRFFIC VESTS
EXPENSES
SWITCH
OXYGEN IND
EXPENSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
REPAIR HEATER CORE
SOFTWARE
PLAQUES
3 MT1000 RADIOS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
INVOICE AMOUNT
$23.50
$346.95
$31.00
$161.20
$364.96
$116.00
$400.00
$86.14
$40.00
$50.00
$190.00
$143.10
$21.72
$1,250.00
$10.00
$26.25
$60.00
$124.56
$15.00
$30.00
$395.00
$365.26
$30.76
$133.62
$86.50
$442.44
$1,947.00
$35.92
$64.80
$47.62
$19.56
$4.07
$10.83
$32.19
$276.93
$58.92
PAGE 12
TOTAL
$23.50
$346.95
$31.00
$161.20
$364.96
$116.00
$486.14
$40.00
$404.82
$1,250.00
$10.00
$26.25
$60.00
$124.56
$15.00
$30.00
$395.00
$529.64
$86.50
$442.44
$1,947.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS TRNG. ASSOC.
OERGEL'S BAKERY & CAFE, INC.
ORDER FROM HORDER
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
QUINLAN PUBLISHING COMPANY
R & R UNIFORMS INC.
RADIO SHACK
SAVANT WELDING SUPPLY, INC
SCHMERLER FORD INC.
STANARD & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
DEL ULREICH
WESTERN DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
DONALD WISNIEWSKI
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
PARTS
PARTS
REGISTER-WERNER
5 REGISTRATIONS
DANISH
OFFICE SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
MTGZSUPPLIESZTRNG
MTGZSUPPLIES/TRNG
MTGZSUPPLIESZTRNG
MTGZSUPPLIES/TRNG
MTGSUPPLIES/TRNG
SUB CRIPTION
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
OXYGEN CYLINDER
PARTS
PARTS
FIREFIGHTER WRITTEN EXAM
SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
EQUIPMENT MICE
EXPENSES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$7.14
$51.80
$40.00
$75.00
$120.72
$203.76
$34.68
$134.36
$13.34
$6.00
$36.25
$48.20
$3.90
$41.03
$2.69
$59.00
$245.42
$422.88
$1,181.25
$409.50
$91.95
$13.63
$14.00
$39.21
$30.41
$4,324.00
$121.06
$828.43
$340.21
$70.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 13
TOTAL
$609.78
$115.00
$120.72
$203.76
$320.45*
$59.00
$2,351.00
$13.63
$14.00
$69.62
$4,324.00
$121.06
$828.43
$340.21
$70.00
$17;566.05
GENERAL FUND $15,407.05 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $2,159.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
CHRIS BAIER
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
LEONARD W. BAZAN
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$15.00
$15.00
DAILY HERALD
SUBSCRIPTIONS
$161.20
$161.20
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$400.00
$34.94
434
$.94
LAUREY KARPINSKI
SEPTICE
DRIVER REIMB
$15.00
$15
$15.00
LISA LEVIN
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
RAY LUNDIN
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$18.00
$18.04
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$68.2$
$68.24
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$94.95
MISC EXPENSES
$5.63
$96.58*
THE SALVATION ARMY
BUDGET ALLOCATION
$937.50
$937.50
OTTO SCHERR
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
JEANNE SHERMAN
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
BERTHA STEIL
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
KATHI WESLEY
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$15.00
$15.00
HELEN WHITLOCK
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$3.00
$3.00
VIRGINIA ZITO
SEPT DRIVER REIMB
$21.00
$21.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,833.46
GENERAL FUND
$1,833.46
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BOLASH CONSTRUCTION CDBG-300 S.WILLIAM $12,380.00 $12,380.00
DAILY HERALD SUBSCRIPTIONS $161.20 $161.20
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO
BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM
$2,300.00
$2,300.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$71.30
$71.30
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$16.46
$16.46*
PROSPECT GLASS COMPANY, INC.
CDBG 713 N.EASTWOOD
$5,790.00
$5,790.00
REI TITLE SERVICES
CDBG-210 N STRATTON
$75.00
$75.00
STELZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
CDBG-419 N RUSSEL
$4,800.00
$4,800.00
T. LEONARD'S EXPRESS LTD.
CDBG-916 S CANDOTA
$841.00
$841.00
V & G PRINTERS INC.
NOTE SHEETS-CLEMENTS
$132.00
$132.00
WILKIN INSULATION COMPANY
WEATHERIZATION-916 S.CANDOTA
$114.50
$114.50
XEROX CORPORATION
1048 COPIER MICE
$342.96
$342.96
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$27,424.42
GENERAL FUND
$723.92 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$26,300.50
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ACCU-PAVING CO.
WILDWOOD LN RECON
$12,700.00$12,700.00*
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$11.41
PARTS
$364.33
$375.74
AIR FILTER ENGINEERS
FILTERS
$282.11
FILTERS
$564.22
FILTERS
$282.11
$1,128.44
MRS ALEKNA
SfC SIDEWALK REPL
$28.00
$28.00
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
SUUPPLIES
$120.43
$120.43
AMERICAN COMFORT GROUP, INC.
BOILER REPLACEMENT SC
$8,009.00
$8,009.00
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
MICE AGREEMENT
$147.00
$147.00
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
PADLOCKS
$61.56
$61.56
THE ARBOR DAY INSTITUTE
REGISTER-CLARK
$125.00
$125.00
KURT ASPEN
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
BEARING DISTRIBUTORS, INC.
CHAIN
$188.00
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
BILL'S LAWN & POWER
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
CADE INDUSTRIES
CENTURY LABS/PRO CLEAN, INC.
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COOK COUNTY TREASURER
R. L. CORTY & COMPANY
DISEASED ELM DETECTION LAB
G & K SERVICES
GNB, INCORPORATED
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC.
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
NELS J. JOHNSON
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
LEE AUTO PARTS
TED S. LOREK
MANCINI CONSTRUCTION, INC.
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CHAIN
$737.50
$925.50
MICE SUPPLIES
$74.58
$74.58
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
$250.03
$250.03
SUPPLIES
$242.50
SUPPLIES
$242.50
SUPPLIES
$242.50
SUPPLIES
$242.50
SUPPLIES
$242.50
SUPPLIES
$242.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$80.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$377.50
$1,912.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$228.38
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$151.79
$380.17
OCT 92 JANITORIAL SVC
$3,592.00
$3,592.00
AUG 92 SERVICE
$8,203.07
AUG 92 SERVICE
$5,562.90
BJ80-JT-23212
$114.79
$13,880.76
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$1,423.76
$1,423.76
MTCE SUPPLIES
$183.08
$183.08
2 ELM SAMPLES
$12.00
$12.00
UNIFORM SERVICE
$165.55
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.69
$317.24
BATTERIES
$145.70
BATTERIES
$291.40
$437.10
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
$1,232.00
$1,232.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$4.52
$4.52
PARTS
$299.35
$299.35
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$2,497.50
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$3,938.00
$6,435.50
CAR RENTALS
$8.75
$8.75
PARTS
$41.98
PARTS
$7.88
$49.86
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
$84.00
$84.00
WILDWOOD LN RECON
$1,200.00
$1,200.00*
SUPPLIES
$78.90
$78.90
SUPPLIES
$44.29
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PICKUS CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
RIC MAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
ROADWORKS, INC.
WILLIAM G. ROBERTS
NICK SOLANO
ST. AUBIN NURSERY
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC
STATE TREASURER
STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY
EDWARD TEED
TOWN & COUNTRY LANDSCAPE
V & G PRINTERS INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%15192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$46.27
SUPPLIES
$49.39
SUPPLIES
$22.41
SUPPLIES
$26.40
SUPPLIES
$260.70
SUPPLIES
$3.20
SUPPLIES
$22.86
SUPPLIES
$94.81
$570.33
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$$29:74
$12.57
MTG/SUPPLIES/TRNG
$9,54*
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$76.59
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$44.13
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3.12
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.60
$125.44*
FUEL CARD READER REPAIRS
$344.42
$344.42
PARTS
$9.66
PARTS
$30.00
PARTS
$162.00
$201.66
QUICKWASH
$238.00
$238.00
GUTTER & CURB PROGRAM
$37,210.98
$37,210.98
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
$56.00
$56.00
S/C SIDEWALK REPL
$112.00
$112.00
2 ORMISTON ROY CRABAPPLE
$310.00
$310.00
SUPPLIES
$160.65
SUPPLIES
$107.38
$268.03
MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$130.73
MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$242.96
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$381.18
S/C MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$529.11
S1C TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
$475.92
S1C TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
$362.98
SJC TRAFFICE SIGNAL MTCE
$265.29
$2,388.17
ELBOWS
$28.10
$28.10
REIMB CDL
$40.00
$40.00
SUPPLIES
$113.70
$113.70
OFFICE WORK ORDERS
$330.00
$330.00
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
CENTURY LABS PRO CLEAN, INC.
CHICAGO TRIBUUNE
CONRAD AND SON
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
G & K SERVICES
PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARTS
PAGE 18
MAY 92 MTCE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
$257.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES
PAYMENT DATE 10115%92
BID NOTICE
$174.16
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA
$104,946.00
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
KEN VACURA
S C SIDEWALK REPL
$112.00
$112.00
VERMEER-ILLINOIS
M CE SUPPLIES
$245.45
$245.45
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
MICE SUPPLIES
$5.43
MTCE SUPPLIES
$102.04
$107.47
WILLIAMSON NURSERY & ASSOC., I
TREES
$2,098.00
TRANSPLANT ASH TREE
$144.00
$2,242.00
WILTON CORPORATION
MTCE SUPPLIES
$28.10
$28.10
WIPECO INC
POLO RAGS
$250.00
POLO RAGS
$95.00
$345.00
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC.
MAIN BROOMS FOR SWEEPER
$1,484.00
MAIN BROOMS FOR SWEEPER
$1,000.00
$2,484.00
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$103,449.73
GENERAL FUND
$41,731.92 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$47,817.81
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$13,900.00
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
CENTURY LABS PRO CLEAN, INC.
CHICAGO TRIBUUNE
CONRAD AND SON
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
G & K SERVICES
PARTS
$35.10
PARTS
$34.20
MAY 92 MTCE
$550.00
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
$257.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$104.00
BID NOTICE
$174.16
SAW BLADES
$68.70
OPER./MAINT.COSTS-JAWA
$28,099.00
VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA
$104,946.00
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
$119,161.00
POWER COSTS-JAWA
$11,458.00
EXTINGUISHER SERVICE
$20.00
UNIFORM SERVICE
$165.55
$69.30
$550.00
$257.00
$104.00
$174.16
$68.70
$263,664.00
$20.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
'INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.70
$317.25
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$84,01
MTCE SUPPLIES
$83.55
$167.56
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
$95.16
WATER METER LABOR
$261.69
WATER METER LABOR
$95.16
WATER METER LABOR
$95.16
$547.17
I.B.M. CORPORATION - BC5
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$21.00
$215.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$114.81
SERVICE
$18.02
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$18.03
SERVICE
$31.49
SERVICE
$51.06
$533.41
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
CAR RENTALS
$1,735.00
$1,735.00
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$8.51
$8.51
LEGEND ELECTRICAL SALES
REPAIR PARTS
$47.00
$47.00
LEXMARK INTERNATIONAL, INC.
4 QUIETWRITER PRINTHEADS
$163.00
$163.00
MCMASTER-CARR
EXT TRENCH BRACES
$215.84
$215.84
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
COPIER SUPPLIES
$197.09
$197.09
MJB TOOLS
TOOLS
$35.85
$35.85
MUELLER ELECTRIC
ELECTRIC MOTOR
$433.12
ELECTRIC MOTOR
$303.20
$736.32
NATIONAL SEWER & WATER, INC.
WATERMAIN LEAD
$7,410.00
$7,410.00
DAVID C. NEWMAN
LEGAL SERVICES
$93.50
$93.50
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
117 N WAVERLY
$17.25
SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA
$26.82
NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND
$17.73
$61.80
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$53.91
SUPPLIES
$41.88
$95.79
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$23.03
$23.03
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
LEGAL PAGE
$21.10
$21.10
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$23.73
$23.73
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$8.59
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$35.43
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C SEPTEMBER LAND LEASE $1,276.72 $1,276.72
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$27.00
$71.02*
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$35.76
PARTS
$12.96
PARTS
$70.80
PARTS
$162.00
$281.52
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
FILM & PROCESSING
$175.54
FILM & PROCESSING
$19.85
FILM & PROCESSING
$32.16
FILM & PROCESSING
$52.15
FILM & PROCESSING
$9.97
FILM & PROCESSING
$9.45
$299.12
SERVALL ENGINEERING CO.
HAND PUMP REPAIRED
$105.30
$105.30
SOUND INCORPORATED
SERVICES RENDERED
$134.00
$134.00
SUBURBAN BRANCH A.P.W.A.
WEEKSJANDLERJBOTH
$45.00
$45.00
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
ENVELOPES
$406.26
ENVELOPES
$869.05
$1,275.31
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
MTCE SUPPLIES
$350.00
SUPPLIES
17.42
$367.42
WATER PRO SUPPLIES INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$21.40
CLAMPS
$67.93
$389.33
WIPECO INC
POLO RAGS
$250.00
$250.00
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
MTCE SUPPLIES
$184.04
OIL
$51.28
MTCE SUPPLIES
$679.20
$914.52
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$281,687.65
WATER & SEWER FUND
$281,687.65
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C SEPTEMBER LAND LEASE $1,276.72 $1,276.72
VENDOR
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ARCHIPLAN INTERNATIONAL LTD.
CHARLES BENCIC
BRAKE & EQUIPMENT
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
CUES, INC.
J. DIPRI14A
LEE AUTO PARTS
A. J. MAGGIO CO.
MCMASTER-CARR
NATIONAL SEWER & WATER, INC.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SEC DONOHUE INC.
BARRY A. SPRINGER
TECH SYN CORPORATION
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
W -T ENGINEERING INC.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
19 NORTHWEST HWY
SUPPLIES
$1,516.65
PAGE 21
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$26.82 $26.82
$213.11 $213.11
***TOTAL** $1,516.65
SERVICES RENDERED
$70.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$3,384.00
$3,454.50
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
$253.26
$253.26
DUMP BODY
$4,838.00
DUMP BODY SUPPLIES
$138.00
$4,976.00
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
$610.00
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
$610.00
$1,220.00
1 HIGH CUBE VAN/TV SYSTEM
$107,070.00
$107,070.00
REIMB-REPAIRS
$93.57
$93.57
PARTS
$17.42
PARTS
$8.71
PARTS
$26.13
$52.26
SAFETY BLDG CONSTRUCTION
$293,019.00
$293,019.00
SUPPLIES
$61.22
SUPPLIES
$31.68
$92.90
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
$867,053.77
$867,053.77*
100 W NORTHWEST HWY
$48.08
$48.08
SERVICES RENDERED
$15,420.24
$15,420.24
LEGAL SERVICES
$33.75
$33.75
HYDRAULIC FITTINGS
$48.74
$48.74
AUG 92 MICE/PRISONER FOOD
$50.00
$50.00
STATION 12 $SERVICES
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
***TOTAL**
$1,295,386.07
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/15/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $113,459.90 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $6,002.58
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $308,489.24 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $33.75
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $253.26 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992 $867,147.34
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BG21-JT-1838-A $50.34 $50.34
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS $3,000.00 $3,000.00
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $3,050.34
GENERAL FUND $3,050.34
PENSIONS
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
CHARLES W. NICK
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAUL H. WATKINS
PENSIONS
GENERAL FUND
WITHHOLDING TAXES
OCT 92 PENSION
NOVEMBER MEDICAL INSURANCE
OCTOBER DISABILITY BENEFIT
$883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2
$200.00
$883.22
$510.00
$1,456.83
***TOTAL**
$200.00
$883.22
$510.00
$1,456.83
$3,050.05
$2,166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $3,532,574.37
DATE RUN 10/15/92 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23
TIME RUN 11.09.20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 10115/92
NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT
1 GENERAL FUND $1,291,949.66
21 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $5,016.26
22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $147,817.81
23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $29,901.42
24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $214,498.28
31 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83
41 WATER & SEWER FUND $419,399.14
46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $5,762.89
48 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $113,459.90
49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $78,671.73
51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $22,061.58
53 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $308,489.24
56 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $33.75
58 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $253.26
59 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992 $867,147.34
73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $5,375.35
74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $20,569.93
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $3,532,574.37
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
HALLOWEEN
WHEREAS, the children of Mount Prospect always anticipate the
fun and festivity associated with the age-old custom of
Halloween "Trick or Treats" by going from door to door in their
neighborhoods, displaying their costumes while requesting
"treats"; and
WHEREAS, the possibility of accidents is an ever present threat
and motorists should be very alert; and
WHEREAS, it would appear that parents generally favor the
afternoon daylight hours for "trick or treat" outings, since
this period permits greater visibility and tends to limit
participation to younger children for whom the observance was
originally intended.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim that Halloween, also known as
TRICK OR TREAT DAY, shall be observed on Saturday, October 31,
1,992. 1 do further ask that both children and parents cooperate
in conducting the time of "Trick or Treat" activities between
the hours of 2:00 P.M. until dusk.
I also ask that younger children be accompanied by parents or
other responsible adults to assure the safety of our children.
Finally, I urge the cooperation of all citizens, both young and
old, to make this a happy and safe occasion for all our
children.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 20th day of October, 1992.
II
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
PORNOGRAPHY AWARENESS WEEK
WHEREAS, the United States Supreme Court has repeatedly ruled
that obscenity is not protected speech under the First
Amendment; and
WHEREAS, the sanctity of Americans' homes has been invaded by
dial -a -porn, cable porn, video porn, satellite -to -dish porn,
,lradio porn, computer porn and rock music porn; and
WHEREAS, pornography inflicts tremendous suffering and damage to
individuals, families, children, business districts, communities
!'and our nation; and
I
WHEREAS, in this era of escalating violence, pornography
1features and promotes sadomasochism, rape and incest; and
WHEREAS, children are increasingly sexually molesting other
children in imitation of what they have seen; and
WHEREAS, the obscenity laws are uniquely grounded in community
standards; and
WHEREAS, millions of Americans throughout this great nation will
be participating in the 5th national white Ribbon Against
;,Pornography Campaign and will be displaying white ribbons as
symbols of decent community standards to be protected by
,enforcement of the obscenity laws.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
(;Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the week of October 25
�jthrough November 1, 1992 as PORNOGRAPHY AWARENESS WEEK in the
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Karol A. Fields
''Village Clerk
Dated this 20th day of October, 1992.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1992
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS S LIQUOR LICENSE
APPLEBEE'S NEIGHBORHOOD GRILL AND BAR
999 NORTH ELMHURST ROAD (RANDHURST MALL)
On Tuesday, October 13, the Village Manager met with Messrs. Douglas Neis and Jerry
Egner from Marcus Restaurants, Inc., regarding a request by Hasty Host, a division of
Marcus Restaurants, Inc., for the creation of a Class S Liquor License. The License will
be used in conjunction with the operation of Applebee's Neighborhood Grill and Bar.
The Class S liquor designation provides for the consumption of alcoholic beverages on
site in conjunction with a lounge.
Messrs• Neis and Egner stated that Marcus Restaurants, Inc., is the
Wisconsin/Chicagoland area franchisee for Applebee's Neighborhood Grill and Bar, a
national restaurant chain. The gentlemen indicated that Applebee Restaurants are
currently in operation in Schaumburg and Bloomingdale and that requests for additional
restaurants are pending in Deerfield and Mount Prospect. Mr. Neis indicated that
Marcus Restaurants, Inc., is a large, well-established corporation that also operates Marc's
Big Boy and KFC restaurants in the Wisconsin/Cbicagoland area.
The proposed location of the restaurant is on the west side of Randhurst on the former
site of Kroch's and Brentano's bookstore. The facility will have a separate outside
entrance that will allow for hours of operation separate and apart from the operation of
the Mall• Plans for the restaurant space have been submitted to the Village and are
currently under review, An early 1993 opening is anticipated.
The Village Manager discussed with Messrs. Neis and Egner some of the particulars of
the Village's Liquor Ordinance and the general philosophy of the Village regarding the
sale and consumption of alcohol. The gentlemen indicated that Marcus Restaurants,
Inc., corporate philosophy was similar and that all managers and liquor servers receive
extensive training in this area.
The required Liquor License application, supporting documents and fees have been
submitted to the Village and are in order. Appropriate background checks are currently
being conducted.
A representative from Marcus Restaurants, Inc., will be present to answer any questions
that you may have.
MEJ/rcc
attachment
CORPORATION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
LOCAL LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR RETAIL LIQUOR DEALER'S LICENSE
RENEWAL "— DATE:
NEW x ($150 Non -Refundable Application Fee- or `
.issuance of new Liquor License; one-time only fee)
Honorable Gerald L. Farley, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Reference in this Application to an owner shall mean any person
who is an owner of more than five percent (5%) of the corporation
which is applying for the license. All questions must be
answered completely. If more room is needed, attach a separate
addendum.
The undersigned, ROBIN J. IRWIN SECRETARY: HASTY HOST DISTRIBUTING CORP.
hereby makes application tor a Class S 11quor eater s
license for the period ending April 30, 1993 , and tenders the
SUM of $ 2,500.00 +$150.00, the prescribed fee as set forth in the
following:
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106):
Annual Fee
CLASS A:
Retail package and consumption on premises
$ 2,500.00
CLASS B:
Consumption on premises only
2,000.00
CLASS C:
Retail package only
2,000.00
CLASS D:
Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only
750.00
CLASS E:
Caterer's license
2,000.00
CLASS G:
Park District Golf Course; beer and wine;
limited number of special events to include
full, service bar facilities; consumption on
premises only
.00
CLASS H:
Supper Club; offering live entertainment
2,000.00
CLASS H:
Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises
2,500.00
CLASS P:
Retail package - refrigerated and non -
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises
1,750.00
CLASS R:
Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only
2,000,00
CLASS S:
Restaurant with a lounge
2,500.00
CLASS T:
Bowling Alley
2,500.00
CLASS V:
Retail package - wine only
1,500.00
CLASS W:
Restaurant - consumption of beer and
wine
only and at dining tables only
1,500.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED
1,000.00
THIS APPLICATION MUST BE COMPLETED BY AN OWNER.
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL.
1. Name and address of person completing this Application.
IN J. IRWIN, 3420 W. COLLETTE C1. 126N. MEQUON WI 53092
2. State your relationship to the business for which the
license is sought. SECRETARY -HASTY HOST DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION
3. Address of the proposed licensed business.999 N. ELMHURST ROAD
SPACE 2130 (RANDHURST MALL)
4. Name of corporation to which license is to be issued.
HASTY HOST DISTRIBUTING CORPORATION
S. Name under which the licensed business will be operated.
APPLEBEE'S NEIGHBORHOOD GRILL & BAR
6. Description of the prbmises at which business will be
operated. gAMpHUgsT M STRijrTrn
Total square feet 5789 Bar area 1122 Kitchenn
2784 No. of tables 37 Type of food served:
MENU ATTACHED No. ofparking spaces COMMON AREAS
7. Does the corporation own the building or the space in which
the business is located? No
(If not, you must attach a copy of your lease to this
application).
8. The expiration date of the lease is 31DEC2002
9. Do you have or intend to have a management contract with
another entity or person, who is not a bona fide employee, to
manage the licensed business for you? No
10. If the answer to number 7 is yes, state the name and address
of the manager or management company.
(The manager or management company must complete a management
company affidavit).
11. Date of incorporation 26Aur.65 (Attach a copy of
the Articles of Incorporation).
12. Has the corporation ever been dissolved, either voluntarily
or involuntarily? If so, state date of reinstatement:
NO
13. If the corporation is incorporated in a state other than the
State of Illinois, you must attach the document pursuant to which
the corporation was qualified under the Illinois Business
Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois.
14. List the names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers
and Social Security Numbers of all Officers and Directors.
OFFICE
NAME ADDRESS HELD
STEPHEN H. C S 7580 N. RIVER ROAD PRESIDENT/DIR.
RIVER HILLS WI 53217
Date of Birth: _31AA,15_ Social Security # 389-7032 Phone #414-352-6822
14100 HEATHEflWOOD COURT V.P.JTRES/DIR
ELM GROVE WI 53122
- 2 -
Date of Birth: 6JUN42 Social Security f 548-56-4521 Phone #4,14-782-2092
ROBIN J. IRWIN 3420 W. COLLETTE CT 126N SECRETARYIDIR.
MEQUON WI 53092
Date of Birth: LhZ&&&Z_ Social Security # 395-46-6166 Phone #A.Lj-ZAZ-k'jj
jL
Date of Birth: Social Security #
Phone #
Date of Birth: Social Security # _ Phone #
15. List the names, addresses, dates of birth and Social
Security Numbers of all shareholders owning in the aggregate more
than 5% of the stock of the corporation:
PERCENT OF
NAME ADDRESS STOCK HELD
-OEM D. MARCUS 6726 N. LAKE DRIVE SEE ATTACHED
FOX POINT WI 53217
Date of Birth: jU&Ugj_t_ Social Security # 395-03-2420 Phone #AjAzu=gkzo
STEPHEN H. MARCUS 7580 N. RIVER ROAD
RIVER HILLS WI 53217
Date of Birth: 31MAY35 Social Security # 389-30-7032 Phone #414-352-6822
DIANE MARCUS GERSHOWITZ 12 OLD HUNT ROAD
NORTH BROOK IL 60062
Date of Birth: Z"pyjA_ Social Security # 392-38-0606 Phone #108-441-6065
HEINE SECURITIES CORP.
51 J.F.K. PARKWAY
SHORT HILL N.J. 07078
Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone #
Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone #
(Additional information to be included on a separate listing).
16. Is the corporation a subsidiary of a parent corporation? If
so, state the name of parent corporation. (The Liquor Commission
has the right to require that the parent company complete a
similar application). MARCUS CORPORATION, 212 W. WISCONSIN AVE. MILWAUKEE
WI 53203 15 PARENT. STOCKHOLDERS LISTED IN ITEM 15.
17. Has any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any or your
managers ever been found guilty of a felony or a misdemeanor,
including but not limited to any gambling offense and any alcohol
related traffic offense? NoIf so, explain the charge,
the date, the city and state whe-fe—the charge was brought, and
the disposition. This must include all findings of guilty,
whether subsequently vacated or not and shall specifically
include any orders of court supervision, whether satisfactorily
completed or not.
(1) Name of Person Charge
Date City & State
Disposition
- 3 -
(2) Name of Person Charge
Date City & State
Disposition -
'18. Is the corporation obligated to pay a percentage of profits
to any person or entity not listed in numbers 14 and 15? NO
if so, explain:
19. If this is a new license application, what kind of business
was previously conducted in the space which you intend to operate
your business? UNKNOWN
20. State the value of goods, wares and merchandise to be used
in the business that are purchased and on hand at this
time: NONE -PREMISES TO BE CONSTRUrfED,
21. How long has the corporation been in the business of the
retail sale of alcohol? SINCE NOVEMBER OF 1991 -SEE ITEM 28.
22. Is any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your
managers an elected public official? NO If so, state the
office and unit of government:
(2)
23. Is any other person directly or indirectly connected with
the operation, ownership or management of your place of business
an elected public official? _NIL_ If so, state the particulars:
24. In the past two yeaks, has any person listed in numbers 14
and 15 or any of your managers made any political contributions
to any member of the Mount Prospect Board of Trustees or to
any member of the Illinois State Liquor Commission? NO
25. If the answer to question #24 is yes, state each one and the
amount:
1
(2)
(3)
26. Does any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your
managers hold any law enforcement office? NO If so,
name the title and agency:
(1) Person Title
Agency
(2) Person Title
Agency
27. Does any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your
managers possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling
Device Stamp? NO If so, state the reasons:
28. Has any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your
managers ever held another liquor license in the United
States? YES If so, state the dates, city and state of each
license:
- 4 -
(1) License Holder HASTY HOST DIST. CORP. Date NOVEMBER 1991
City & State 601 MARTINGALE RD., SCHAUMBURG IL
(2) License Holder HASTY HOST DIST. CORP. Date SEPTEMBER 1992
City & State 354 ARMY TRAIL RD. BLOOMINGDALE IL
29. Has any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your
managers ever had a previous liquor license (whether wholesale or
retail) revoked by the Federal government or by any state,
county or local government? NO If so, explain:
30. Has any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your
managers ever been denied a liquor license from any
jurisdiction? If so, state the particulars:
31. Other than when making an initial application for a license,
has any persons listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your
managers ever been subject to charges, hearing or
investigation by any jurisdiction with respect to a liquor
license? NO
32. If the answer to question #31 is yes, list each and every
charge, the date of the charge, the eventual disposition of the
charge and the municipality or other jurisdiction bringing the
charge.
(1) Charge Date
Jurisdiction Disposition
(2) Charge Date
Jurisdiction Disposition
If no charges were involved, state the reason for the
investigation or hearing.
34. It is your duty to read the Mount Prospect Village Code,
Chapter 13, Alcoholic Beverages carefully, if necessary, with
your lawyer. After having done so, is there any reason why.you
or any person listed in numbers 14 and 15 or any of your managers
is disqualified to receive a license because of the laws of this
State or the Ordinances of this Village? NO If yes, state the
reason:
35. Is there any State of Illinois or Village of Mount Prospect
regulation which you do not understand? No If yes, please
explain.
36. Does the business which is proposed to be licensed currently
carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage for this premises? YES if
"Yes", attach copy.
37. It the premises are leased, does the owner of the premises
carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? YES (If the answer to
either of the foregoing questions is "no," no license shall be
issued.
38. Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and
Social Security Number of all managers or agents who will be in
charge of the premises for which this application is made:
- 5 -
29W480 MORNINGSIDE DRIVE
(1) Name MICHAEL J. JURGENS Address BARTLETT IL 60103
Date of Birth 19APR45 Telephone # H708-830-6465
Social Security # 499-46-2049
(2) Name TO BE APPOINTED PRIOR To Address
Date of Birth OPEN NG Telephoni-#
Social Security *
39. If this is a renewal application, has the ownership or
management changed in any manner since the prior
application? If yes, please explain: NJ_A-MEW APPLICATION
A license is not transferable under any circumstances. At
such time as any person becomes a 51 stockholder who was not
named as such at the time of application, the license issued
pursuant to this application will become void. If you anticipate
a sale of the business, or' a 5% change in ownership, it is your
sole responsibility to assure that a reapplication process is
started well ahead the change. ALL INVESTIGATIONS BY THE LOCAL
AUTHORITIES MUST BE COMPLETED BEFORE A NEW LICENSE WILL BE
ISSUED. Approval for a license takes a minimum of forty-five
(45) days and may take much longer.
THE SURETY BOND REQUIRED BY THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE CODE MUST
ACCOMPANY THIS APPLICATION AT THE TIME OF FILING.
Signature of Applicant
Corporate Seal General Counsel and Secretary
(If applicant is corporation) 1 0,
STATE OF WISCONSIN
SS.
COUNTY OF f*)RXQX& MILWAUKEE
Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says
that he is/are the applicant(s) for the license requested in
the f-oregoing Application; that he is/are of good repute,
character and standing and that answers to the questions asked in
the foregoing Application are true and correct in every detail.
I further state that I have read and understand the Code
provisions of the Mount Prospect Village Code which address the
sale and.delivery of alcoholic beverages. I further agree not to
violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United
States of America or any of the ordinances of the Village of
Mount Prospect in the conduct of my place of business.
I ALSO UNDERSTAND THAT AN UNTRUE, INCORRECT OR MISLEADING
ANSWER GIVEN IN THIS APPLICATION IS SUFFICIENT CAUSE FOR THE
REFUSAL TO GRANT OR THE REVOCATION OF ANY LICENSE GRANTED
PURSUANT TO THIS APPLICATION.
I further give my permission to the Village of mount
Prospect or any agency of the Village to check with any agency or
individual named or referred to in this Application to verify or
clarify any answer that I have given.
APLICANT
- 6 -
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of Odlby
1
PUBLIC
RY
APPLICATION APPROVED:
Local Liquor Control Commissioner
\\HGM\EMH2C-02C
- 7 -
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE REFERENDUM ACT
RELATIVE TO S N S
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has continuously imposed unfunded
state mandates on local government; and
WHEREAS, the cost of unfunded state mandates has placed financial
burdens on local governments; and
WHEREAS, the opportunity to provide services is best determined by
local officials; and
WHEREAS, the continued mandated programs from the State erodes
local control; and
WHEREAS, the citizens of the Village of Mount Prospect as well as
citizens from each and every community in the State of Illinois
have direct access to local governments; and
WHEREAS, residents of Mount Prospect share the concer of local
elected officials relative to the cost for providing vital
services; and
WHEREAS, the General Assembly and Governor Edgar have provided an
opportunity for the people to speak this election year; and
WHEREAS, Public Act 87-0919 provides for an advisory non-binding
referendum to be place on the November 3, 1992 ballot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby unconditionally support an affirmative
vote by the citizens of this community at the November 3, 1992
election.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
DATE: OCTOBER 16, 1992 1�r
SUBJECT. CHARLIE CLUB SIGN SKETCH
At the request of the Village Board, a sketch has been prepared by Charlie Vavrus
indicating his preliminary thinking of the sign proposed for installation on private property
at the northwest comer of Midway Drive and Elmhurst Road.
It should be noted that the final determination of the sign's configuration would be the
subject of a special use request once Village Board action approves the text amendment.
KHF:hg
j, -
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH R. FRITZ, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
DATE: OCTOBER 1, 1992
SUBJECT: CHARLIE CLUB SIGN
This case was originally heard by the Sign Review Board on May 4. The motion was to
recommend denial of the request for the text amendment for off -premise signs as a special
use. On July 21, the Village Board heard the request by Charlie Club for the special use
text amendment to allow off -premise. After hearing testimony, the Village Board referred
the case back to the Sign Review Board for further public testimony and recommendation.
Mr. Vavrus, owner of the Charlie Club, his attorney Mr. Greg Dose, and Donald Anderson,
Senior Vice President of Park National Bank met with Messrs. Fritz and Clements to discuss
a possible solution to signage issues regarding the Charlie Club and Park National Bank.
As a result of this meeting, staff together with Mr. Dose proposed a text amendment to be
added to the special use section of the Sign Ordinance that would permit off -premise
business identification signs when contiguous to a parcel having major street frontage,
provided there is no increase in the number of freestanding signs on the property allowed
by the Ordinance.
The Sign Review Board reconsidered the request on September 14. After taking the
testimony into consideration and the recommendation by staff after the joint meeting with
Charlie Club and Park National Bank, the Board made the following motion. A motion was
made by Hal Predovich, seconded by Elizabeth Luxern, that Section 7.701 be modified by
adding the phrase "and off -premise business identification signs" and adding a new
paragraph e. to Section 7.330 entitled " Off -Premises Business Identification Signs", spelling
out conditions that would provide that:
a. this sign directs attention to a business located on the lot adjacent to the lot on
which the sign is located;
Michael E. Janonis
Page 2
October 1, 1992
b. the sign may contain changeable copy directing attention to products, services, and
promotions of the identified business provided the standards of Section 7.325.E are
met;
c. the sign must be on a lot which is adjacent to a major arterial street;
d. an easement or a license must have been granted allowing erection of the sign;
and the number of freestanding signs allowed by this Chapter on a lot on which the
sign is located shall not be increased.
The vote on the motion to recommend approval to the Village Board was 5 ayes, 0 nays.
The Village Board would be asked to consider amending the text of the Sign Ordinance to
incorporate these changes into the appropriate sections. If approved, the second step by the
petitioner would be to seek a special use under the new provisions of the ordinance for site
specific signs for both Charlie Club and Park National Bank
KHF:hg
.I CriICE
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT SIGN REVIEW BOARD
September 14, 1992 SEP 24 'IM
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Sign Review Board (SRB) was officially called to order by
Chairperson Adelaide Thulin at 7:35 p.m. on Monday, September 14, 1992 at the Village
Hall, 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Members of the SRB, present: Richard Rogers, Warren Kostak, Elizabeth Luxem, Hal
Predovich and Chairperson Adelaide Thulin. Also present were Nick Gianaris; President
of Triangle Sign Company; Gregory Dose, Attorney for Charles Vavrus; Donald Anderson,
Park National Bank; Attorney for Park National Bank and Kenneth Fritz, Economic Develop-
ment Coordinator.
This case was referred back to the Sign Review Board by the Village Board of Trustees.
The petitioner seeks a text amendment of the Sign Ordinance, Section 7.330 and Section 7.701
to create a special use for off -premise signs. This case was continued from August 31 at the
request of the petitioner, The Sign Review Board had earlier heard the request to amend
the text of the Ordinance on April 20 and May 4. The action taken by the Sign Review Board
at the May 4 meeting was to recommend denial of the text amendment for off -premise signs
as a special use to the Village Board. The motion passed 4 ayes, 1 nay, Adelaide Thulin
voting nay.
The amortization schedule contained in the
conforming Charlie Club sign to be correcte
interpreted by staff considering we Charlie
permitted to be placed on another property.
Erroneous information was presented at the May 4 public hearing which indicated that Mr.
Vavrus at one time owned the parcel of land subsequently purchased by Park National Bank.
Mr. Vavrus indicated that he, at no time owned the Park National Bank parcel. He did,
however, indicate that a sip easement was conveyed to him by the previous land owner at
the time the Health Club was built on his property to the west. Mr. Vavrus also indicated
that be paid for the improvements of Midway Drive and the deceleration lane on Elmhurst
Road, in front of the Park National Bank.
Villagg Board Digsussion
At the July 21 Village Board meeting, it was the general consensus of the Mayor and Village
Board that staff, together with the private parties involved, namely, Park National Bank and
Charlie Club work together toward a solution that would result in Park National Bank and
Charlie Club having freestanding signs adjacent to Elmhurst Road. It was recognized, the
first step toward such a resolution was to amend the text of the ordinance to permit off -
premise business identification signs as a special use. Thereafter, a separate request would
Sign Review Board Minutes
Page 2
be made to the Sign Review Board to seek a special use permit for an off -premise business
identification sign.
T -31c", Wnw,
In the afternoon of September 14, Mr. Charles Vavrus, owner of Charlie Club, Greg Dose,
attorney for Charlie Club, and Donald Anderson, Senior Vice President of the Park National
Bank met with Messrs. Fritz and Clements to discuss a possible solution to signage issues
regarding Charlie Club and Park National Bank. The following conclusions resulted from
this meeting:
1. Park National Bank si
Bank. Tle Bank's sug
Elmhurst Road, center
the south parkway of 1
2. Neither party desired t
3. Mr. Vavrus wished to I
setback on the record(
4. Staff worked on a propi
a. Makes a distinction
or billboard signs.
b. Properly addresses
property not having di
c. Permits signage adj
;ested a separate sign for Charlie Club and Park National
stion was to install a Park National Bank sign adjacent to
on their building, and for Charlie Club to install a sign on
dway Drive on public right-of-way.
;hare a sign because of the need for separate identification.
.ce a new sign meeting the new criteria for area height and
sign easement granted to him earlier in 1980.
,d text amendment which offered a potential solution which:
:tween business identification signs and outdoor advertising
unusual nature and circumstances of a sign on contiguous
access to a major roadway.
nt to Elmhurst Road for Park National Bank.
As a result of this meeting, staff together with the attorney for Charlie Club, Mr. Dose,
proposed a text amendment t ' o be added to the special use section of the Sign Ordinance
that would permit off -premise business identification signs when contiguous to a parcel
having major street frontage, provided there is no increase in the number of freestanding
signs on the property allowed by the ordinance.
Ct— n--*— V ---A
After carefully taking into consideration the facts in the case as updated by Mr. Vavrus, Mr.
Dose and Mr. Anderson, as well as the staff recommendation for a solution, a motion was
made by Hal Predovich, seconded by Elizabeth Luxern that stated Section 7.701 be modified
by adding the phrase, "and off -premise business identification signs," and adding a new
paragraph e. to Section 7.330 entitled "Off -Premises Business Identification Signs," spelling
out conditions that would provide that:
a. the sign directs attention to a business located on the lot adjacent to the lot on
which the sip is located.
Sign Review Board Minutes
Page 3
b. the sign may contain changeable copy directing attention to products, services, and
promotions of the identified business provided the standards of Section 7.325.E are
met;
c. the sip must be on a lot which is adjacent to a major arterial street;
d. an easement or a license must have been granted allowing erection of the sign;
and the number of freestanding signs allowed by this Chapter on a lot on which the
sign is located shall not be increased.
The vote on the motion was 5 ayes, 0 nays.
Is Restaurant, 10
W
. ... .. .. South outh Elmhurst R
Mr. Nicholas Gianaris, construction manager for Lunan Family Restaurant, owners of the
Shoney's franchise in Mount Prospect, presented his case for increasing the number of lines
of changeable copy from two to five on the new freestanding sign. The sign is located at
the southwest comer of Golf and Elmhurst Roads. This request was earlier denied by the
Sip. Review Board at the special meeting on August 31. Through a mis-communication
between business owner and sign company, no one was present to make the presentation
in Shoney's bebalL They therefore asked the Board at the next regular meeting to reconsider
their action and open up the meeting for public testimony from the petitioner. 'ne motion
to reconsider was made by Mr. Predovich, seconded by Mr. Rogers to open the discussion.
Mr. Gianaris indicated in his presentation that the existing reader board contains five lines
of copy, is a vital factor in the marketing of Shoney's menu to the customer. He stated that
Shoney's offers three distinct meal periods during the day to three very different audiences.
Each meal period has the ability to offer special promotions to entice people to visit Shoney's
at that specific period. He indicated they use the reader board to advertise the specials during
all these meal periods. He went on to say that Shoney's traffic is impulse motivated and the
reader board provides the necessary opportunity to communicate on this level. He also stated
that to lose the customers attracted by the reader board, they would be unable to maximize
their sales potential projected for this location. They have spent an estimated over $325,000
for equipment and training costs of employees; and at the same time retaining 35 original
WAG employees. He said that any less than 5 lines of changeable copy makes it difficult
to communicate any message.
It was pointed out in the staff report that they were seeking relief through a special use equity
option on the basis of trading -off lines of permanent items of information for additional lines
of changeable copy. The existing sign has only one word, "Shoney's" instead of the maximum
of six permanent items of information together with two lines of changeable copy. Mr. Fritz
passed acopy of photographs showing the passing traffic at this location. He suggested that
three lines of changeable copy seemed appropriate given the trade-off, but that the two lower
lines of copy were sometimes obscured by standing and moving traffic pass the sign.
Sign Review Board Minutes
Page 4
Motion
A motion was made by Mr. Rogers, seconded by Mr. Predovich, to approve increasing the
lines of changeable copy to three on the basis of the trade-off of permanent items of
information. It was also noted that there is but one wall sip instead of the potential of three
as permitted by ordinance. It was then on the basis of these notations that a vote was taken
on the motion. The motion was 5 ayes and 0 nays.
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was
CAF/
10/15/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 7 ENTITLED "SIGN REGULATIONS
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MPT
MT PROSgECT
WHEREAS, Charles Vavrus (d/b/a as Charlie Club) , hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner, has filed a request to amend Chapter 7
(Sign Regulations) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect by
creating a category for "off -premise" signs; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Review Board did consider the request, being the
subject of Sign Review Case No. 24-92 followiong due and proper
notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on April
10, 1992, at their regular meeting held on May 4, 1992, August 31,
1992 and September 14, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Review Board has forwarded their recommendation
to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect has considered the proposed amendment to Chapter 7
and have determined that the best interests of the Village would be
served by approving the proposed amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated as findings of fact by the 'President and Board of
Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Section 7.330 of Article III entitled "General
Provisions" of Chapter 7 (Sign Regulations) of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding
thereto paragraph E; so that hereinafter said Section 7.330 shall
include the following:
It E. off -premise Business Identification Signs. The following
standards shall apply:
1. The sign must direct attention to a business on a
lot adjacent to the lot on which the sign is
located.
2. The sign must be located on a lot which is adjacent
to a major arterial street.
3. The number of free-standing signs permitted by this
Article shall not be increased by the placement of
the off -premise sign.
4. The lot on which the business to be benefitted by
the off -premise sign must not have any frontage on
an arterial street.
5. An easement or license must be granted allowing the
placement of the off -premise sign.
6. The sign may contain changeable copy as provided
for in Section 7.325.E of this Chapter.
SECTION THREE: That Section 7.701 of Article VII entitled
WWI
Chapter 7
Page 2 of
"Appeals, Variations and Special Uses" of Chapter 7 (Sign
Regulations) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended; so that hereinafter said Section 7.701
shall be and read as follows:
Of Sec.. 7.701. scope of Appeals, variations and Special Uses. An
appeal from a staff decision made in interpreting,
applying and/or enforcing the regulations contained in this Chapter
may be taken to the Sign Review Board.
A variation may be requested from the height, area, and minimum
distance requirements contained in this Chapter, provided that no
variation shall exceed the maximum height, sign area, and distance
requirements by more than twenty-five percent (25%).
A special use may be requested to permit an electronic message
center, development identification signs, non -conforming wall signs
and the equity option, and off -promise business identification
signs. 11
SECTION FOUR; That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGE
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PeNING >*?
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-59-Z-92; 60 -SU -92; 61-V-92, LARRY MCKONE
PRESKI'S RESUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
MODIFICATIONS .805 EDGEWOOD LANE
Zd4bg Rovests:
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a rezoning, Special Use Permit and variation application filed by Larry McKone. The
applicant is requesting to rezone the property at 805 Edgewood Lane from "R -X" Single -
Family to "R-1" Single -Family. The petitioner is also seeking a Special Use Permit as
required in Section 14. 110 I.C.8 to allow garages designed to house more than two vehicles,
as well as a variation to Section 14.3016 to allow driveways which are 30' in width instead
of the maximum allowed 21'.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 27, 1992,
At the meeting, Larry McKone explained that he is interested in rezoning the property to
R-1 Single Family so that a conforming two -lot subdivision can be completed. He indicated
that there are R-1 zoned lots in the area and the lots to the north are smaller than the
proposed lots. He also indicated that he wished to offer three -car garages as an option to
the future home buyers and the variation to driveway width is needed so that it can
adequately serve the wider widths of the garages.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the rezoning will allow for a two- lot subdivision with lots
which are 97' x 119.32' (11,574.04 sq. ft. each). Mr. Forsythe also indicated that this area
of Mount Prospect contains a variety of residential zoning and lot sizes. There is R-1 Single
Family to the east, R -X Single Family (minimum 17,500 sq. ft.) to the west. He also stated
that this area of Mount Prospect is tending to redevelop from large lot homes to rezoning
and redevelopment to "R-1" standards. The lots to the east are large lots however, the
frontage is only 116 feet which would require several lots to resubdivide.
Mr. Forsythe also indicated that three -car garages and wider driveways are a common
request in Mount Prospect. Mr. Forsythe concluded by stating that staff supported the
request because the proposed lots are of a size that large homes in character with the
neighborhood could be built,
PRELIMINARY PAT OF
PES 1' ' RESUBDIVISION
BEING A RESUBDIVISION IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH,
RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNT', ILLINOIS.
.c Sour-ls I-' NE or "),ytyiuiii 13LVA-
C►.x�QTti UNF oF--tfieweVr S<L. i,.1 -4I -/I
119.72
W
W
O
EASEMENT PROVISIONS
V
O
An easement for serving the subdivision and other property with i
/
L Q T ,
and communications service is hereby reserved for and granted
CO
COMMONWEALTH EDfSON COMPANY
40 80 a
AND TC T CABLE AND
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,
SCALE IN FEET o �
GRANTEES,
Me'
Lk
e P clwetuRetsore endetegnre. ImilyTw1dE bnYallopwiols me.
e . han t— b bne. recifae ued n opnnectan wfh w ..d end urd,
aenemeton
enddwtld.A— de4Ncfy end tounde end,gnaie n, over, under.—
O
° Q
119-52 --
ad upon the -0— d ro
the pP" ,hove wfhn the dnet atbd (- the ptY ed
Eeernenr, end the PI -O" detgnebd on the plc hn etneb end YNye. bgett—
m rgM n b W1 npured tervice -A *over w under the sada. (d lot i
.--_ mp+ovenanU th a i. the rght to overhand eN tote with send sena wsee b terve r
$MS. Ua ngtd b cut. trm w Me a ti -e. bushes sed roots a nay be ,eeecnebty ,
etudeM b the rghte heron given. wd the right b enter upm Ne subd.,ded poped
W
cath p))lP— obeUu&— th.11 nd be pl— aver 9—U ' lecitet a n, upon w+
Q
property, wlhn the do" d ices narkedfeerranr wfhaA Ue p—wreen taneeM d g.
Mer nslellr of any such leGfen, the grate d the,ubdwded papedy snap rat be
n e nar,ner toe b ".ff a wfh the poper ognenn eM nantenence thered
Q
M eeemeM • hereby reserved fpr end granted b NORTHERN iwNas axe COMP)
ik
Lia
t`
a) L 0 T 2
surres,de ad IgM, n IMI nletbd 'esenanr ass,, Neste, Yleye, other pubic er
pieces ,haven m t wfr. mod e® rd to tx to th. Wlst.n, , ta,a,te. rk
t()
renewal eMl --'W Or gas mens rd ePPIAerwcas for UE pup— d senmg Y
Ywwn w the PIM m well e, other pot»M. whether w nal oontquo w the,eb No to
ttl
a other aWQures si,M be Cn N.d -.ratted n any t h'easemenr .—, Neale
a other pubic ways a places na ,hdt erry dhM ass bt node Ue,ed +vhdt rfl nierq
Ue tesemenb rescued end granted hereby
119.32
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 59-Z-92, ZBA-60-SU-92
ZBA-61-V-91
PETITIONER
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT-
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
Larry McKone
805 Edgewood
August 11, 1992
The petitioner is requesting the following:
I.Rezoning from "R -X" Single Family to "R-
1" Single Family to permit a conforming two lot
subdivision. 2. Special Use Permit as required
in Section 14.1101.CS to allow garages designed
to house more than two vehicles. 3. Variation
from Section 143016 to allow a driveway 30 feet
in width instead of the maximum 21 ft. allowed.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
Peter Lannon
Lorraine Bretaz, 809 Edgewood
Chairman Basnik then introduced ZBA-59-Z-92, ZBA-60-SU-92 and ZBA-61-V-92 from
Mr. LAM McKone for the property at 805 Edgewood.
Mr. McKone introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated he is purchasing
an existing lot on Edgewood Lane that presently has an R -X Single Family classification.
He explained that he is in the process of subdividing this property into two lots with
dimensions of 97 ft, in width and 119 ft. in depth. He stated that, while the R-1 zoning
allows smaller lots than the existing R -X classification on Edgewood, the two proposed lot
sizes are over 11,500 square feet, and that these are very large R-1 lots that would allow the
development of two large custom homes. He stated that he typically builds homes 3,000 to
4,000 square feet, and that these lots are of sufficient dimension to accommodate this large
custom home. He also explained that the Special Use was filed in order to permit the
construction of three -car garages with these homes, and that this is a typical amenity that
a buyer of upper bracket homes looks for. He stated that the driveway width variation is
necessary to provide the proper driveway dimension for the three -car garages.
The Zoning Board of Appeals th,
that the rezoning was appropriatt
of the R-1 standard, and would a]
with sizes of homes in the area a
Chairman Basnik then asked for
Family District. Mr. Brettrager n
rezoning to an R-1 District. The
Upon Roll Call: AYES:
NAYS: None
Chairman Basnik then asked foj
three -car garages. Mr. Saviano
Appeals recommend approval c
Upon Roll Call: AYES:
NAYS: None
Upon Roll Call: AYES:
NAYS: None
These recommendations will be
ZBA-59-Z-92, ZBA-60-SU-92, ZBA-61-V-92
Page 3
generally discussed the request, and it was determined
)r this area in that the two lot sizes would be in excess
v the construction of a home that would be compatible
therefore, not have any adverse impact.
motion on the rezoning from an R -X to an R-1 Single
ved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of the
iotion was seconded by Mr. Saviano.
tr, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
motion on the request for a Special Use Permit to allow
Dved, seconded by Mr. Pratt, that the Zoning Board of
he Special Use Permit to allow three -car garages.
.r, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
n the driveway width variation. Mrs. Skowron pointed
I ithe driveway should taper to 21 feet at the property
the petitioner was agreeable to this condition. Mr.
)er was agreeable with him.
g Board of Appeals recommend approval of a 30 foot
tapering to 21 feet at the property line. The motion
, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
iarded tothe Village Board for their consideration.
A -A aftOWAL
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-59-Z-92; 60 -SU -92; 61-V-92
APPLICANT: LARRY MCKONE
ADDRESS: 805 EDGEWOOD LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION.
ZONING: Current: R -X Single -Family; Proposed: R-1 Single -
Family
LOT SIZE: Current: 22,148.00; Proposed: 11,574.04 each
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A.R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
4. Additional Comments: Building Permits required prior to any construction
Enzinngerin¢:
1. Subdivision/Consolidation: There is an existing 10' rear yard easement which is not
shown. Existing subdivision plat also shows a 50' front. Rezoning may change the
front yard setback.
2. Sanitary Sewers: There is an 8" sanitary sewer on the east side of the street.
3. Surface Drainage: There are no storm sewers in the area. The wider drive and 3 -
car garage cause more impervious surface and increase the run-off rate.
4. Water Supply: There is a 6" water main on the west side of the street. Existing
water service for house if not to be used shall be capped at the main.
5. Any Additional Comments: All development code requirements (i.e. storm, street
lights, etc.) will be imposed on this subdivision.
SYMMARXECOMMENDATION
It is the opinion of the Planning Staff that the proposed rezoning from "R -X" Single -Family
to "R-1" Single -Family at 805 Edgewood Lane be considered for approval. While all the
properties on Edgewood are the large lot RA classification, this rezoning and subdivision
provide lots in excess of 11,500 sq. ft. This lot size is sufficient to allow construction of
homes that will be consistent with the character of this area. Also, staff would recommend
approval of Special Use Permits with variations to allow the subsequent two lots to be
improved with 3 -car garages and driveway widths that do not exceed a maximum of 30' in
front of the garage and are a maximum of 21' at the property line. All outstanding issues
and concerns of the Building and Engineering Department shall be addressed and resolved
prior to the issuance of any building permits.
DMC:hg
CAF/
10/14/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R -X TO R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT AS IT
PERTAINS TO PROPERTIES GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 805 AND 807 EDG W OD
WHEREAS, Gettysburg Development Corporation (hereinafter referred
to as Petitioner), has filed an application to rezone the
properties commonly known as 805 Edgewood Lane and 807 Edgewood
Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally
described as follows:
Lots 1 and 2 in Preskis Resubdivision, being a resubdivision
in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County,
Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from R -X to R-1 (Single Family Residence) District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 59-Z-92, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
August, 1992 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been
published in the Mount Prospect herald on the lith day of August,
1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of
ZBA 59-Z-92 and have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to
a R-1 (Single Family Residence) District.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
1992.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
CAF
10/15/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND
VARIATION FOR PROPERTIES
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 805 AND 807 EDGEWOOD LA
. ..... NE
WHEREAS, Gettysburg Development Corporation (hereinafter referred
to as Petitioner) has filed an application for a Special Use and
variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 805 and 907 Edgewood Lane
(hereinafter referred to as subject Property), legally described
as:
Lots 1 and 2 in Preskis Resubdivision, being a
resubdivision in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use permit, as provided in
Section 14.1101.C.8, to allow a garage designed to house more than
two vehicles on each lot and a variation from Section 14.3016 to
allow each lot to have a driveway thirty feet in width (301),
rather than the permitted 21 feet; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the Special Use and variation
requested, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 60 -SU -92 and ZBA 61-V-
92, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 27th day of August, 1992, pursuant to due and
proper notice thereof published in the Mount Rrospect Herald on the
11th day of August, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the Special Use
and being the subject of ZEA 60 -SU -92 and the special use permit
being the subject of ZBA 61-V-92, and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said requests.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO:, The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Properties a Special Use
to allow a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles on
the Subject Property and a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow
driveway widths of thirty feet (301) at the garage, provided the
driveways taper to twenty-one feet (211) at the property line.
SECTION THREE: Except for the Special Use and variation granted
a
ZBA 60 -SU -92 and ZBA 61-V-92
Page 2 of 2
herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances
and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the
Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1992.
CAF/
10/14/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY MOM AS 805 AND 807 EDGEWOOD LANE
WHEREAS, Gettysburg Development Corporation (hereinafter referred
to as Petitioner) has requested modifications from the Development
Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property commonly
known as 805 and 807 Edgewood Lane (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Lots 1 and 2 in Preskis Resubdivision, being a resubdivision
in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County,
Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting the following modifications
from the Development code, in conjunction with the creation of a 2
single family lot subdivision:
1. To allow a lot depth of 199.52 feet, rather than the required
1201; and
2. To waive the requirement for installation of the following
public improvements: public sidewalks; curb and gutter;
required street width and paving; and, street lights.
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modifications from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on
August 19, 1992 and September 16, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendations
relative to the modifications requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property
the following modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16):
1. To allow a lot depth of 199.52 feet, rather than the required
1201; and
2. To defer the installation of the following public
improvements: public sidewalks; curb and gutter; required
street width and paving; and, street lights, subject to the
Petitioner executing a Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing the
installation of such improvements at such as the Village
determines appropriate.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Modifications
805 & 807 Edgewood Lane
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Mwo*ip
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
10/15/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR PROPERTIES
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 805 AND 807 'EDGEWOOD L
-ANE
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect have considered the request of Gettysburg Development
Corporation to modify the requirements of the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for properties commonly known as 805 Edgewood Lane and
807 Edgewood Lane, legally described as follows:
Lots I and 2 in Preskis Resubdivision, being a resubdivision
in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County,
Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting the following modifications
from Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect for the Subject Property:
1. To waive the requirement to install sidewalks;
2. To waive the requirement to install curb and gutter;
3. To waive the requirement to install street lighting; and
4. To permit a lot depth of 119.52 feet, rather than the required
120 feet.
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Plan Commission did consider the
requests stated herein at their regular meeting held September 16,
1992; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Plan Commission has forwarded their
recommendation to the Village Board to grant the requests herein,
provided a Restrictive Covenant is executed, which Restrictive
Covenant shall be recorded against the subject property, insuring
installation of street lights at such time as the Village deems
appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees have determined that the
best interests of the Village would be served by having the
developer enter into a Restrictive Covenant, a copy of which is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A",
guaranteeing the installation of the specified improvements at such
as the Village determines appropriate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of
F'-�
Mc Kone's Edgewood
Restrictive Covenants
Page 2 of 2
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees do hereby
authorize execution of a Restrictive Covenant, a copy of which
Restrictive Covenant is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A", for property commonly known as 805 Edgewood
Lane and 807 Edgewood Lane.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to record
with the Recorder of Deeds or Registrar of Titles, whichever is
applicable, a fully executed copy of the Agreement being the
subject of this Resolution.
SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
4V40KF
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT BY AND BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS AND
THE OWNER -DEVELOPER OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN SAID
VILLAGE REGARDING COMPLETION OF REQUIRED PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENTS P'ERTAININ TO THE DEVELOPMENT OE SAID PROPERTY
805 and 807 Edgewood Lane
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16 entitled 'Development" of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois certain public improvements are required to be
constructed and installed by owners and developers of property within the Village, as part
of the approval for the development of such property; and
WHEREAS, the schedule for accomplishing the construction and installation of such
public improvements by the owner -developer of the property under development is often
in conflict with other public improvement projects adjacent to or within the vicinity of said
property so as to render the accomplishment of such public improvements by the owner -
developer to be practically or economically unfeasible until the same can be combined with
or scheduled so as to conform with such other public improvements affecting the subject
property under development; and
WHEREAS, such other public improvement projects are administered by the Village,
County or State, officials over which the owner -developer has no control, and in some
instances those improvements to be accomplished by the owner -developer with respect to
the property under development cannot be completed until the other improvements under
Village, County or State control have been accomplished; and
WHEREAS, under such circumstances, it is deemed to be inequitable to delay
development of the property under development or to require the owner -developer to
establish a cash escrow, letter of credit or improvement bond for the purpose of guaran-
teeing the completion of required public improvements due to the delay caused by the
intervening or subsequent accomplishment of other public improvement projects under
administration and control of the Village, County or State; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 16 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois provides that
in lieu of a cash escrow, letter of credit or development bond, the owner -developer may
execute a restrictive covenant to be recorded and to run with the land as a guarantee that
the required public improvements shall be completed with respect to the property under
development.
NOW, THEREFORE, in accordance with the provisions of the said Chapter 16 of
the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the Undersigned, Owner -Developer does
hereby covenant with the Village of Mount Prospect, an Illinois municipal corporation, as
follows:
1. The Undersigned is the Owner and Development of the following described
property within the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to wit:
Preski's Resubdivision in the Northwest Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North,
Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois.
2. A plan of development of the described property by the Undersigned has been
approved by the Village of Mount Prospect, which approval includes the completion of the
following public improvements contained in and provided as a part of the plans, to wit:
To purchase and install the required street lighting, sidewalks, curb and gutter and
construct that part of Edgewood Lane adjacent to the said property to the
appropriate width, all performed according to Village Code, upon the request of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
3. For a period of twenty (20) years commencing from the date hereof, the
Undersigned shall undertake the above -stated improvements with sixty (60) days after being
so advised by the Village of Mount Prospect to commence such construction and instal-
lation work, and shall continue said work without interruption or delay, until the
improvements are completed in a satisfactory manner and in accordance with Village plans
and specifications pertaining thereto.
4. This Covenant to complete the said public improvements as herein contained
shall run with the said property; and for the period of time as set forth herein. Nothing in
this Covenant shall in any way prevent the alienation or sale of the subject property or any
portion thereof, except that said sale shall be subject to the provisions hereof and to the
plan of development pertaining to the property, and the new owner shall be both benefited
and bound by the conditions and restrictions herein expressed.
�t=
5. This Covenant shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their successors and assigns in title and interest and the provisions hereof
shall be enforceable in a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or persons
seeking to violate the same including an action for injunctive relief, specific performance
or to recover damages or other fines and penalties as may be established in such violation.
In the event that the owner -developer of the subject property fails to complete the required
improvements or pay a proportionate share of the required improvements by other
contractors within the specified time periods herein, the value of such improvements shall
be entered as a lien against the property due and payable within sixty (60) days after
notification to proceed with the improvements.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this
__Jay of , 19 1
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
Real Estate Ind" No. 08-14-105-502
OWNER -DEVELOPER
B WA AW a ta 01
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
- 3 -
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER M
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-63-V-92, NATHAN AND BARBARA GREENBERG
1028 SOUTH BEECHWOOD DRIVE
DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION
Variation Hgquest;
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Barbara and Nathan Greenberg. The applicants are
requesting variations to allow a 27 foot wide driveway and subsequent increased front yard
lot coverage of 40%.
The Zoning Board considered the request at the meeting of September 24, 1992. At the
meeting, Mr. Greenberg indicated that the wider driveway is necessary to accommodate the
family automobiles due to the ban on on -street parking. Mr. Greenberg also noted that
there are two handicapped persons in the family and the additional driveway will be
beneficial in backing out for his wife.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report and noted that Mrs. Greenberg is
permanently handicapped and it is difficult for her to turn her head. He also added that
there are many 21 foot driveways in the area, but none appear to be as wide as the request.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. It was noted that a letter
of support was received from the next door neighbor. By a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board
recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 27 ft. wide driveway and a 40%
front yard lot coverage at 1028 South Beechwood.
Development Code ModiricatiQn,
The owner of this property is requesting a Development Code modification in order to
permit the construction of a 27 foot wide driveway apron. The apron at the curb shall be
no greater than 30 feet in width. The applicant's current driveway is approximately 18 feet
wide and serves a two -car garage. Recently, he has purchased a third car and would like
to park it on the left side of the driveway. The owners have noted that Mrs. Greenberg is
handicapped with neck and back problems. She does drive one of the vehicles but has a
problem turning in the driver's seat to see behind the car. The applicant feels that a straight
27 foot driveway would considerably help her in moving in and out of the driveway and
garage. Mrs. Greenberg is permanently disabled. The additional width of the driveway
would allow the household to utilize their three cars without jockeying cars in and out of
the driveway.
The Plan Commission met in regular session on September 16, 1992 and voted 5-0 in favor
of recommending approval of the applicant's request. Staff had no objections to this
Development Code modification.
i
l-, E, 11
r
_7C; -A
If -,I W Alk
is
x -
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 63-V-92 Hearing Date: September 24, 1992
PETITIONER: Nathan & Barbara Greenberg
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1028 S. Beechwood Drive
PUBLICATION DATE: September 8, 1992
REQUEST: The following variations are needed in order
to widen an existing driveway: 1.) A variation
from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway with
a maximum width of 27 feet instead of the
allowed 21 ft. 2.) A variation from Section
14.1102.A to allow the front yard lot coverage
to be 40% instead of the maximum allowed
35%.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this item as a variation request at 1028 South Beechwood
Drive to allow a maximum driveway width of 27 feet rather than 21 feet, and a front yard
coverage of 40% rather than the maximum 35%.
Mr. Greenberg introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that the wider
driveway is necessary to accommodate the automobiles in the family. He stated that Mount
Prospect does not allow any on -street parking and that with three drivers in the family there
is a constant need for maneuvering cars in and out of the driveway. Further, Mr. Greenberg
noted that there are two handicapped persons in the family, and that the wider driveway
is necessary for maneuvering and backing out, particularly for his wife who has a fused neck.
He stated that she cannot turn her head properly and that a wider driveway straight back
to the street would accommodate this hardship of his wife.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the request for the Zoning Board of Appeals. He
stated the petitioners seek to widen their 18 foot driveway to 27 feet and noted that the
ZBA-63-V-92
Page 2
application includes an indication that Mrs. Greenberg is handicapped. Mr. Forsythe noted
that there are many driveways in the area that are 21 feet wide, but none appear to be as
wide as the 27 foot requested by the petitioners. He also noted that the Plan Commission
had reviewed and approved their request for a wider driveway apron in the parkway.
No one appeared to speak in favor or in opposition to the request.
Mr. Basnik asked if the driveway could be tapered to 21 feet at the property line as had
been done with other requests, and Mr. Greenberg emphasized that for the purpose of
accommodating his wife and her difficulty in turning her head, that it is easier to back
straight out rather than to maneuver the car in the driveway.
Mr. Cassidy made note of a letter of support from the property owner at 1100 South
Beechwood.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that a hardship
existed in terms of the handicap of Mrs. Greenberg, and how the 27 foot driveway would
not adversely affect the neighborhood.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion. Mr. Saviano
moved, seconded by Mr. Pratt, that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a variation to
allow a 27 foot driveway and a 40% front yard coverage at 1028 South Beechwood.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Skowron, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion carried by a vote of 7-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
�x- C&M'k�
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
ZBA-63-V-92
NATHAN AND BARBARA GREENBERG
1028 SOUTH BEECHWOOD DRIVE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 8,497.50
% COVERAGE: (Current) 37.46%; (Proposed) 39%
F-A—R. N/A Front yard: (current) 31% (proposed) 40%
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The following variations are needed in order to widen an existing driveway:
1. A variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway with a maximum width of 27
feet instead of the allowed 21 ft.
2. A variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow the front yard lot coverage to be 40%
instead of the maximum allowed 35%.
PLANNINGNICONCEM
Summary of application: The petitioners are seeking to widen their 18 ft. driveway to 27
feet. The application indicates that the current off-street parking ban prohibits overnight
parking on the street. Also indicated is that Mrs. Greenberg is handicapped, and the
additional space is requested to allow an easier access to and from their automobiles.
Attached to the staff report is a letter from Mr. Greenberg regarding the variation request,
as well as a letter from the neighbor supporting the request.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The applicants have stated that there is a handicapped
driver in their household, and it has been indicated that an elderly parent with disabilities
as well as a young driver also live in the home. The additional parking area is requested
for ease into and out of the driveway as well as parking for family vehicles. A review of the
block finds many driveways at approximately 21 feet, but none seem as wide as the 27 foot,
three -car width requested by the petitioner.
The wider driveway will increase the front yard lot coverage from the current 31% to 40%.
Wider driveways are not an uncommon request in Mount Prospect due to the limited
driveway widths and the on -street parking ban. There should be a negligible increase in
stormwater run-off from the wider drive, and no adverse impact on the area.
LY
It has been indicated that a variation from the Development Code is required in order to
widen the approach. The petitioners have been scheduled to be heard by the Plan
Commission at their September 16 meeting.
The Engineering Division indicates that the existing curb is a valley -type gutter and it will
not be necessary to change it to accommodate the wider approach. No concerns about
stormwater run-off were made.
The Police Department indicates support of any attempt to move cars off the street.
Inspection Services has indicated that the existing drainage should not be altered, and also
suggested that the driveway be tapered to 21 feet at the sidewalk and keep the approach at
21 feet.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
In order to accommodate three vehicles, handicapped residents and the on -street parking
ban of the Village, the petitioners are seeking to widen their drive to 27 feet. The driveway
will be 27 feet at the property line and will need separate approval from the Plan
Commission for the approach.
Staff believes that the petitioners have proved a hardship and would recommend approval
of the variations for a 27 foot wide driveway and a 40% front yard lot coverage.
RPF:hg
CAF
10/15/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1028 BEECHWOOD DRIVE
WHEREAS, Nathan and Barbara Greenberg (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 1028 Beechwood Drive (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 1 in E. J. Frediani's First Addition to Mount Prospect
being a subdivision of part of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow
a twenty-seven foot (271) wide driveway, rather than the permitted
211 width; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 63-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of
September, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 8th day of September,
1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 63-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.3016 to allow a twenty-seven foot (271) wide
driveway.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
al-
ZBA 63-V-92
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
10/15/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1,028 SOUTH BEECHWOOD DRIVE
WHEREAS, Nathan and Barbara Greenberg (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have requested a modification from the Development
Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property commonly
known as 1028 South Beechwood Drive Avenue (hereinafter referred to
as Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Lot 1 in E. J. Frediani's First Addition to Mount Prospect,
being a subdivision of part of the Northwest Quarter of
Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, Petitioners are requesting a modification from the
Development Code to permit a twenty-seven foot wide driveway apron,
rather than the permitted 211 as provided for in Section 16.403.8.J
of the Development Code of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modifications from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on
September 16, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendations
relative to the modifications requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTIOI! TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property
a modification from the Development Code (Chapter 16) to allow a
driveway apron twenty-seven feet wide in the public right-of-way,
rather than the maximum of 211.
SECTION . THREE' This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
[il
'08VIOA0a 101 0/,St PU73 XBMDAllp ,S
-,gZ V 'SDjZlTq0A 10101U OtAl Uleqj 010111 asnoq of pou2isop Ouid v mollu 01 SUOTMIJUA PUE
1"n'l asfl liopodS Qqj JO IICAOjddv spuounuonj sieaddV jo piloog 2uruoZ oql '010A O -L L'
Xq -SU011101118A 09LIJOA03 iol joqijTij inoqilm pomolp, Qq p1nom soinioruls lo s-uoij!ppv joqliTij
OU JVlqj 142UTS 'IN 01 POI'831PUI SVM 11 -imboj oqi pQssn3sip Xjjuipw3 pieog RuruoZ oiLL
,s;)snoq
Supsm) moqi qijm raiavrvga ui si xuog posodoid oqi pun so2uxd laa-;)ajqj oArq vain siqi
Ul slol oqj jo Auuui mqi palvatpui pule liodai yels Qqj pazuLlununs liouurl(j 'oqlxsloa Xleu
-sa2ung 1-ca-aDiql ;)ALq uoisiqxins
sim ui mfuog uo s;Dwoq Rupsao oqj tile' I-eqj poppr OH -2111PTumoo sT oqauioq mou oqj
ql!m r opnl:)ui ol olisop siq poluDipui qSutS ju-emiVS 'SuIIOQw aql IV 7661
`17Z ioquialdoS jo 2upaotu jioql lie isonboi aqj poiop!suoi sreaddV Io pi7aoq SuruoZ ;)q.L
'0/,St, JO ;)2VlOAO:) 101 IlVl'aAO UP PUle XIMOATIP QP!M,,S-,gZ B M011p
01 SUOIJEUVA PUle sojoipA JOJOLU OMJ u-cip ojoLu Qsnoq ol pau2isgp oguivS -e molp, of l!lUlod
asfl jriX)dS io Supsonbai axe SJULXiddr ;nLL -qSuiS I-eqbj V jurmarS Xq pal!j uoil-vilddt, uv
uo uoprpuourmox)i iToqi uopejop!suo:) ino,( joj siTiusupil speaddV jo pnog juTuoZ QLLL
aaxaAV VJLINOUjLsam octi :NOIJLVJOII
HONIS IV901 V JNVAALVS 'Z6-A-L9-VUZ 'Z6-flS-99-VHZ :133fgas
Z661 W -d38W3"HS :3jLvG
'DKINNVld 30 U0103HIG 'SJNHW3'I0 U alAYU :WOHA
N39VNTM 39VT11A 'SINONIVf *3 'I3VHZ)IW :01
sioutill Iloodsoid junoW
JN3WllfVd3a 9MINNN9d
139(ISOHd INflOW 30 30'F IMA
`
fog 7H
24'Pu&,ic U 71417ruj
�aq
Ac
IIIMIY�YIf ����� �•.
NI—
dL
a= a•�PZBg4K
mac! �,"
�'
8-o sETeAck, `
.
a
->
ix
AD
-1W1 44114-DLA-4a LIME
Io�PL/,84/G U7/L/77 iE.
«ILI'
�`�
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 66 -SU -92; ZBA-67-V-92 Hearing Date: September 24, 1992
PETITIONER: Satwant & Zqbal Singh
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1430 West Bonita Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: September 8, 1992
REQUEST: The Petitioners are seeking the following in
order to allow the construction of a three -car
garage with the construction of a new home:
1.) A Special Use as required in Section
14.1101.C.8 to allow a garage designed to house
more than two motor vehicles. 2.) A variation
from Section 14.3016A.3 to allow a driveway
width of 26'-8" instead of the maximum allowed
21 feet. 3.) A variation from Section 14.1102.E
to allow a total lot coverage of 48% instead of
the maximum allowed 45%.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Michaele Sk6wron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next case being an application filed to allow a Special
Use for a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles for a home at 1430 West
Bonita, and a variation of the driveway width to allow a 26'-8" driveway, and a front yard
coverage of 48% rather than 45%.
Mr. Singh introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated he is going to be
building a home at 1430 West Bonita. He explained that he is presently a resident in Mount
Prospect and has a two -car garage, but that he would like to include a three -car garage with
his new home. He noted that all of the other houses in this new subdivision on West Bonita
have three -car garages, and that this request is necessary to allow him to have the same
feature.
Chairman Basnik then noted that the driveway width variation is necessary to accommodate
the three -car garage, and that this increased driveway width leads to the variation in the
required front yard. Mr. Basnik also noted that he is aware that all of the other houses in
this subdivision have three -car garages.
ZBA-66-SU-92, ZBA-67-V-92
Page'2
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and
indicated that the petitioners hope to construct a three -car garage with a wider driveway at
their new home, and that this leads to the increased lot coverage. Mr. Forsythe stated that
this subdivision has a number of three -car garages that were allowed with earlier Special
Use Permits and that this request is similar to existing conditions in the neighborhood. He
also noted all the required setbacks had been met, and that staff had no objections to the
request. Mr. Forsythe also pointed out that the owners of the lot at 1218 West Glen Lane
had submitted a letter in support of the petitioner's request.
Chairman Basnik then asked for comments from the Zoning Board. Mr. Cassidy noted that
there are number of other three -car garages on West Bonita, and Mrs. Skowron pointed out
that, while she supports the request, this does lead to a higher lot coverage, and asked the
petitioner if there were any plans to construct any additional decks, sheds or patios on the
property. Mr. Singh stated he had no plans to do any more construction.
Mr. Saviano asked Mr. Singh if he was acting as the general contractor on this request, and
Mr. Singh stated that he was the general contractor.
Mr. Brettrager also indicated the concern for any additional lot coverage at this location,
and Mr. Lannon stated that any new construction on the lot would require a variation that
could be considered at that time.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and found that it was similar to existing
conditions in the neighborhood, and Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the Special
Use for a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles. Mr. Lannon moved that
the Zoning Board recommend approval of this garage designed to house more than two
motor vehicles. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Chairman Basnik then asked -for a motion on the variation requests to allow the wider
driveway and the increased overall lot coverage, and Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning
Board of Appeals recommend approval of a 26'-8" driveway and a 48% lot coverage. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion carried by a vote of 7-0. Ilese recommendations will be forwarded to the
Village Board for their consideration.
�. M, UPMAVtI_
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIV., CHAIRMAN
FROM:
PLANNE4"
RAY P. FORSYTHE, 31
R
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-66-SU-92, ZBA-67-V-92
APPLICANT:
SATWANT & ZBGAL SINGH
ADDRESS:
1430 WEST BONITA AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
3 134
134
gi
119
213
300
1 301 1
4
129 t 30
'
4
303
302
302
1 132
123
6
3 134
134
gi
304
=Us:
305
306
,t. " 8
*0NrA AV
7
1419
1 5
3
308
a
2 309
CLCVCN AV
70
O
0
0
KC2
12
3
313
205 206
135
207 208
314
209! 210
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 11,250 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: (Proposed) 48%
F.A.R. : .35
213
300
1 301 1
4
4
303
302
3
6
304
=Us:
305
306
2
7
2 7
307
308
a
2 309
70
0
0
12
3
313
314
315
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 11,250 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: (Proposed) 48%
F.A.R. : .35
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioners are seeking the following in order to allow a three -car garage with the
construction of a new home:
A Special Use as required in Section 14.1101.C.8 to allow a garage designed to house
more than two motor vehicles.
2. A variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 26'-8" instead of
the maximum allowed 21 feet.
3. A variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow a total lot coverage of 48% instead of
the maximum allowed 45%.
Summary of application: The petitioners have indicated their desire to construct a three -
car garage and wider driveway to the new home they are going to build on the vacant lot
at 1430 West Bonita. Subsequently, the wider driveway and larger garage create a lot
coverage of 48% instead of the maximum allowed 45%. The application indicates that the
subdivision currently contains many three -car garages and an additional three -car garage will
not be a detriment to the area.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioner has requested a Special Use Permit with
variations in order to allow a three -car garage to be built on the vacant property at 1430
West Bonita. This subdivision has had several Special Use Permits with variations granted
to allow similar three -car garages. The garage is designed as a side load and the driveway
is situated such that it tapers to 12 feet in the front yard and no front yard lot coverage
variation is required. The property in question is a large "R-1" Single Family lot of 11,250
square feet. This area of Mount Prospect has had many new homes built in the past several
years which are large in nature. This home which has been proposed for this particular lot
has a floor area ratio of .35 which is the maximum allowed. No future room additions will
be allowed without a variation. The ordinance allows a maximum 45% lot coverage. The
proposed home with three -car garage indicates a total lot coverage of 48%. All the required
setbacks have been met and the required grading and drainage plan has been approved with
the building permit.
It has been also indicated is that there is a fire hydrant and light pole on the right-of-way
which will need to be located so that there is no conflict with the driveway.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
W-4 x4is)
im
Staff has no objection to the request as the petitioners have done a good job of minimizing
the front yard lot coverage by tapering the driveway to 12 feet. ibis area has many three -
car garages and the proposed house will be similar to those already constructed. Staff would
like to remind the petitioner that no further lot coverage or room additions will be allowed
on this lot without further variations.
RPF:hg
CAF
10/14/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND
VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1430 WEST BONITA AVENUE
WHEREAS, Satwant and Iqbal K. Singh (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for a Special Use and
variation from chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 1430 Bonita Avenue
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described
as:
Lot 12 in Kathcon Subdivision Unit 2, being a
resubdivision of those parts of Lot "KII in Kirchoff
Subdivision ;and Lot 9 of Kathcon Subdivision (being also
a resubdivision of Lot "KII) of the Northwest Quarter of
the Northwest Quarter and the North 10 chains of the
Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, all in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a Special Use permit, as provided in
Section 14.1101.C.8, to allow a garage designed to house more than
two vehicles and variations from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a
driveway width of twenty-six feet eight inches (261 801), rather
than the permitted 21 feet and Section 14.1102.E to allow a total
lot coverage of 48%, rather than the maximum allowed 45%; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the Special Use and
variations requested, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 66 -SU -92
and ZBA 67-V-92, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village
of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of September, 1992, pursuant to
due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prosrect
Herald on the 8th day of September, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the Special Use
and being the subject of ZBA 66 -SU -92 and variations being the
subject of ZBA 67-V-92, and have determined that the best interests
of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said
requests.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
. herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant a Special Use to allow a 3 -car garage
on the Subject Property, a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to
allow a driveway width of twenty-six feet eight inches (26' 811).
ZBA 66 -SU -92 and ZBA 67-V-92
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: Except for the Special Use and variations granted
herein, all other applicable village of Mount Prospect ordinances
and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the
Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
v
tA VA-r*4-
TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager fZ
FROM: David M. Clement p,11 -rector of Planning
DATE: October 14, 1992 AKI
SUBJECT: Appeal of ZBA Decision - Case #ZBA-68-V-92
LOCATION: 212 South Owen Street
At a public hearing on September 24, 1992, the Zoning Board of
Appeals denied by a 3-4 vote, a variation request for a 61 fence
at 212 South Owen Street. The Zoning Board of Appeals has final
administrative approval for such a variation.
The Zoning ordinance provides that any person may appeal a decision
of the Zoning Board of Appeals. Such an appeal must be filed
within 15 days of the public hearing.
On October 7, 1992, John Romano, petitioner, filed an appeal of the
Zoning Board of Appeals decision. The Zoning ordinance requires
that this appeal be forwarded to the Village Board for their review
of the Zoning Board of Appeals decision. The Village Board should
review the petitioner's request for a 61 fence, the Zoning Board
of Appeals decision, and the appeal of Mr. Romano and make a final
determination on this matter.
RF: cl
attachments: Application for ZBA Appeal
Minutes of 9/24/92 meeting of the ZBA
Staff Report
The following is the rational behind this appeal
1. Constructing a fence that is only five feet in height will not effectively contain the black Labrador retriever that we
will be acquiring in the near future. If the dog is to jump over the fence, it could attack an injure an adult, child or
a neighborhood pet, The injuries, if serious enough, could result (cause) in physical hardship.
2. Fencing pickets comes in 6 R, lengths. Cutting off one foot of material would result in an excessive waste of
material (171/6) and money (approx. $500). The scrap from pressure treated lumber is considered toxic, and lumber
yards (Handy Andy & Courtesy) will not cut the pickets down to size. The additional cost, and the resultant scrap
that would be generated will cause financial hardship and will pose environmental concern,
3. The variance was overruled by a decision of 3 - 4. Neither immediate neighbor are objecting to the building nor
placement of the fence, and none were present to protest at the hearing on 9/24/92. It is my opinion, that the
swaying vote cast by Chairman Basnik was unduly influenced by a discussion that took place (in my absence) with
my overly meddlesome neighbor who resides at 214 S. Owen.
4. The following points were extracted from the minutes taken at the hearing:
Paragraph 5 - Basnik indicated we have yet to obtain our dog and this did not "support" our case. This should
have clearly indicated to the board that we are responsible home owners that are pWming ahead.
Paragraph 8 - Basnik had a discussion with one neighbor, not neighbors as the minutes indicate. The discussion
took place in my absence, and was unduly influenced by an overly nosy neighbor who resides at 214 S Owen.
T)iscussions took place with both immediate neighbors the evening prior to the hearing and all potential concerns
were addressed to their satisfaction.
'ragraph 9 - Basnik indicated the fence would obstruct a neighbors window. A closer look at the site plan clearly
a,. Is no blockage of the window in question.
I
Wrc t%-4 WQQ
OLEASE PRINT OR TYPE
IN BLACK IMr—
CASE NO.:ZBA-
APP -
V.B.HEARING DATE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
APPLICATION FOR ZBA APPEAL
1.
Applicant
2..
Address -7/7 Z7Z-
Screet
City
State------Z—ip Code
3.
Phone Number (During
9 a.m.- 5 p.m. Mon. thru Fri.
4.
Property owner ---/mw,/
(Name
and Address _77-airterent than
above)
5.
LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF SUBJECT PROPERTY:
6.
Real Estate Index
3 -5-
7.
Give a statement listing
49 M 0 -3 co
your reasons and justification, for your
appeal:
The following is the rational behind this appeal
1. Constructing a fence that is only five feet in height will not effectively contain the black Labrador retriever that we
will be acquiring in the near future. If the dog is to jump over the fence, it could attack an injure an adult, child or
a neighborhood pet, The injuries, if serious enough, could result (cause) in physical hardship.
2. Fencing pickets comes in 6 R, lengths. Cutting off one foot of material would result in an excessive waste of
material (171/6) and money (approx. $500). The scrap from pressure treated lumber is considered toxic, and lumber
yards (Handy Andy & Courtesy) will not cut the pickets down to size. The additional cost, and the resultant scrap
that would be generated will cause financial hardship and will pose environmental concern,
3. The variance was overruled by a decision of 3 - 4. Neither immediate neighbor are objecting to the building nor
placement of the fence, and none were present to protest at the hearing on 9/24/92. It is my opinion, that the
swaying vote cast by Chairman Basnik was unduly influenced by a discussion that took place (in my absence) with
my overly meddlesome neighbor who resides at 214 S. Owen.
4. The following points were extracted from the minutes taken at the hearing:
Paragraph 5 - Basnik indicated we have yet to obtain our dog and this did not "support" our case. This should
have clearly indicated to the board that we are responsible home owners that are pWming ahead.
Paragraph 8 - Basnik had a discussion with one neighbor, not neighbors as the minutes indicate. The discussion
took place in my absence, and was unduly influenced by an overly nosy neighbor who resides at 214 S Owen.
T)iscussions took place with both immediate neighbors the evening prior to the hearing and all potential concerns
were addressed to their satisfaction.
'ragraph 9 - Basnik indicated the fence would obstruct a neighbors window. A closer look at the site plan clearly
a,. Is no blockage of the window in question.
I
8. List by section number and brief description the section(s) of the
Mount Prospect Ordinance that are in contention.
Sec. 14.
If applicant is not the
owner of the property, WNER, ... ..... ...
the owner MUST co-sign the ke
application ut all but applicable designation)
HDate: :'�Y'a im)Q
APPLICANT �It ditterent than above)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 68-V-92 Hearing Date: September 24, 1992
PETITIONER: John Romano
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 212 South Owen Street
PUBLICATION DATE: September 8, 1992
REQUEST: A variation from Section 21.601.A of the Village
Code to permit a fence height of six (6) feet
along the interior and rear lot lines instead of
the maximum allowed five (5) foot height.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next request being a variation to allow a 6 foot fence
rather than a 5 foot fence along the interior and rear lot lines at 212 South Owen Street.
Mr. John Romano then introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that
he would like to construct a 6 foot fence in his rear yard to provide for better safety and
security for a dog that his family will be obtaining in the near future. He stated that a black
Labrador could jump over a 5 foot fence and he believed that a 6 foot fence would provide
better safety for the neighborhood. Mr. Romano then began an analysis of the cost of a 5
foot fence and stated that, cutting back a 6 foot fence to a 5 foot height, results in 17%
waste and an excessive number of individual cuts to a wood fence, and that this dollar value
equals $342 in wasted money creating a 5 foot fence. Mr. Romano indicated that a 6 foot
fence would not be detrimental to his neighbors and stated he has had conversations with
both abutting property owners.
Dave Clements then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and
indicated that a 6 foot fence is requested along the side and rear lot lines, and that the
petitioner lists the added cost of a 5 foot fence and the safety of keeping a dog enclosed,
as the reasons to support the variation. Mr. Clements also made reference to the fact that
there is an existing alley behind the Romano's property, and that staff is presently in the
ZBA-68-V-92
Page 2
process of preparing a plat of vacation to vacate this alley in order to allow the fence to be
constructed in the location as indicated on the survey.
Chairman Basnik then asked for comments from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Basnik
stated that he did not see a particular hardship with this case, and that the increased cost
of putting up a 5 foot fence is not necessarily a hardship. He also pointed out that the
petitioner has yet to obtain their pet, and that he believed that this does not help support
the case.
Mr. Brettrager pointed out that obtaining the dog is creating their own difficulties and Mr.
Basnik pointed out that the Village Board had recently made a strong case on 6 foot fences,
and that in this case, there is not a hardship which he believed was necessary to support the
request.
Mr. Romano again emphasized that there would be a hardship to the neighbors when he
does obtain his dog, if the pet were able to get over a 5 foot fence, and that he is obtaining
this pet from his brother in the near future, and he believes that this is sufficient
information to warrant a 6 foot fence.
Mr. Basnik pointed out that he had inspected the petitioner's property and met with the
neighbors, and that there had been some concern indicated to him that perhaps these
abutting property owners were not comfortable coming to the Zoning Board meeting.
Mr. Basnik noted that the house to the west has a large window in the sideyard, and noted
that the fence location is getting near this window and he was concerned about the
appearance of the fence outside this window. Mr. Romano responded and stated that this
window is in a corner of the house, and that the fence would not directly line up with the
window, and that the reason he was extending the fence down a portion of his driveway was
to allow an enclosure of a stooped area off a side door, so the dog could be let directly out
of the house into a fenced area to the rear yard.
Mrs. Skowron noted from the site plan that the fence could be moved farther west, away
from the widow on the neighboring property to a point just necessary to enclose the area
with the stoop and the side door, and asked if the petitioner would be willing to move the
fence back as a compromise. Mr. Romano stated that he could move the fence back as long
as the side door was included in the fenced area, and the swing of the gate would work at
this location.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request, and Mr. Basnik emphasized
that he did not see a hardship and that perhaps the petitioner should look at obtaining a
household pet that could be contained with a 5 foot fence. Mr. Brettrager stated that he
also does not see a hardship and noted that in the prior case on the agenda, there was a
grade change on the petitioner's property that helped support the need for a taller fence,
and he did not see a similar condition with this application.
ZBA-68-V-92
Page 3
Mrs. Skowron stated she believed she had offered a reasonable compromise, and Mr,
Lannon noted that the Zoning Board has rarely denied a 6 foot fence, particularly in a case
when there is no objecting neighbor. He stated that he did not see a detrimental impact
from this request, and Mr. Saviano noted that he had never seen a real demonstrated
hardship in any 6 foot fence request, with the exception of the application recently on Camp
McDonald Road with the hyper -active child.
Mr. Basnik stated that the Zoning Board is final in a fence request and he believes that the
Village Board has indicated they would like a more critical review of fence variations. Mr.
Pratt stated that the Zoning Board had recommended on several occasions that the
Ordinance be changed to allow 6 foot fences, and that this had been denied by the Village
Board, and to some "tent the Village Board was providing direction to the Zoning Board
to have 5 feet as a standard fence height.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Lannon moved, seconded by Mrs. Skowron, that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a
variation to allow a 6 foot fence at 212 South Owen Street.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Skowron and Saviano
NAYS: Pratt, Cassidy, Basnik and Brettrager
Chairman Basnik explained to the petitioner that the Zoning Board of Appeals is final with
matters of fence variations, but that the petitioner can appeal this decision within 15 days
to the Village Board, and Mr. Basnik suggested that Mr. Romano talk with the staff if he
was interested in pursuing the appeal process.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
A M E N D E D P A G E
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
V -0f
RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-68-V-92
APPLICANT:
JOHN ROMANO
ADDRESS:
212 SOUTH OWEN STREET
LOCATION MAP:
C fuss[ AV
101
100
�'o 1
100
103
102
103
102
10
1 t
104
107
106
107
106
109
108
109
108
111
110
ill
110
112
113
112
1,15
114
115
114
117
116
117
11
119
11g
jig
Ila
121
120
E EVENWEN ♦V
I
2 gSL
201
200
203
X
202
20
202
205
204
205'
204
�7��
0
206
207
204
4 22 ON
208
209
208
210
J21
gil
210
2
213
214
2t5
2t6 w
217
216
217
218
219 i
2ig
219
220
220
221
220
L22M
223 1
224
E WKAU" ♦V
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: (Current) 6,900; (Proposed) 7,300
% COVERAGE: N/A
FAR.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
REQ ES
The petitioner is seeking a variation from the maximum 5 ft. fence height of Section
21.601.A in order to permit a 6 ft. fence along the interior and rear lot lines.
Summary of application: The petitioner wishes to place a 6 foot fence along the interior
and rear lot lines of his property including an 8 foot section in the rear which is currently
in a dedicated alley. Listed as the reasons for the 6 foot fence is the added cost of a 6 ft.
fence compared to a 5 ft- fence, and the petitioner's plans of obtaining a dog they believe
will need a 6 foot fence to keep it contained.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioners are proposing to place the fence to the
center of an existing 10 foot dedicated alley. Staff has begun the vacation process and a
plat of dedication is being prepared. Since the vacation process has begun, staff feels it is
appropriate for the Zoning Board members to consider the petitioner's request to include
the proposed fence in this area. There are no 6 foot fences in the immediate area of the
subject property, however, there is a great deal of existing landscaping which meets or
exceeds six feet in height The petitioners wish to obtain a dog which may need the extra
height to keep it away from neighbor's yards. Also indicated is the added cost of cutting a
foot from a standard six foot fence.
Comments from other departments were primarily concerned with the alley vacation which
is in the process of completion. Drainage shall be maintained as existing and all permit
procedures will need to be followed.
Six foot fences are a common request in Mount Prospect. Staff has looked at the existing
landscaping in the area and acknowledged the petitioner's reasons for the 6 foot fence. Staff
would support the requested variation, however, the petitioner must fully discuss the reasons
why a 6 foot fence is necessary, and further detail how a 5 foot fence would not be
sufficient.
RPF:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNr PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services 131) t4l'e�
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Traffic/Project Engineer
DATE: October 13, 1992
SUBJECT: School Zone Speed Limit
Milburn Avenue and loka Avenue
Representatives of the Safety Board from St. Raymond School have requested that
the Village review the current traffic regulations around their school. Attached is a copy
of the minutes from the Safety Commission Meeting held on October 5, 1992 whereby I
presented various safety improvements.
Based on the recommendation approved by the Safety Commission, I am requesting
that the Village Board of Trustees adopt a Village Ordinance establishing a 20 MPH
SCHOOL SPEED ZONE on loka Avenue from Shabonee Trail to Evergreen Avenue, and
a 20 MPH SCHOOL SPEED ZONE on Milburn Avenue, from HiLusi Avenue to Pine
Street. Ioka Avenue currently does not have a posted speed limit (based on the Village
Code, traffic may travel 30 MPH on loka Avenue) Milburn Avenue is currently posted at
25 MPH.
I recommend that the Village board review these proposed amendments to the
Traffic Code at their October 20, 1992 Board Meeting.
Fr/rn
xc: Village Clerk
Public Works Director
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Traffic/Project Engineer
DATE: October 13, 1992
SUBJECT: Stop Sign at Milburn Avenue and loka Avenue
Representatives of the Safety Board from St. Raymond School have requested that
the Village review the current traffic regulations around their school Attached is a copy of
the minutes from the Safety Commission Meeting held on October 5, 1992 whereby I
presented various safety improvements.
Based on the recommendation approved by the Safety Commission, I am requesting
that the Village Board of Trustees adopt a Village Ordinance for establishing a 4 -WAY
STOP at the intersection of Milburn Avenue and loka Avenue. This intersection is at the
northwest comer of St. Raymond Church and school complex. According to traffic
guidelines established by the Illinois Department of Transportation, this intersection meets
the warrants for a STOP SIGN at each leg of the intersection.
I recommend that the Village Board review these proposed amendments to the
Traffic Code at their October 20, 1992 Board Meeting.
FT/m
xc: Village Clerk
Public Works Director
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECr, ILLINOIS 60056
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services 10
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Traffic/Project Engineer
DATE: October 13, 1992
SUBJECT: Parking Along Prospect Avenue
A request was made by the Police Department to review the current parking safety
issues along Prospect Avenue near Maple Street. Within the past year the Police
Department received 2 accident reports involving a pedestrian being struck by a vehicle.
Attached is a sketch of Prospect Avenue from Emerson Street to Maple Street
showing the current and proposed parking along the north side of the street. Also attached
is a copy of the minutes of the Safety Commission Meeting from October 5, 1992 outfirang
the recommended solutions to the safety hazard that currently exists. Please note that I am
recommending:
(1) the removal of one "pay' parking stall.
(2) the removal of two 4 HR parking stalls near the bicycle rack.
(3) The relocation of the pay box from the east side to the west side of the
walkway.
I have recevied a favorable response from the businesses along Prospect Avenue
(Mrs. P & Me Restaurant, Ibbotson Heating and Busse's Car Wash).
I recommend that the Village Board of Trustees review this situation at the Board
Meeting on October 20, 1992.
FT/m
xc: Village Clerk
Public Works Director
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECT, II ENOIS 60056
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Director of Inspection Services
Project Engineer
-� o Hf, ZFROM:
/O/P
DATE: September 29, 1992
vto
SUBJECT: i0
I have received several complaints about the current parking situation on Ida Court.
In particular, I have received complaints about the police ticketing the cars that are
diagonally parked in the cul-de-sac.
Existing conditions allow parallel parking only on the north side of Ida Court. The
Public Works Dept. has requested that parking not be allowed on the south side of the
street due to complications with snowplowing. I have considered making Ida Court one-way
and installing diagonal parking. This would increase the available parking by about 40%.
However, I believe that this proposal would create a more dangerous situation.
After canvassing the residents on Ida Court, I received about a 50-50 split decision
that a parking problem even exists. Most of the residents who do not want one-way traffic
flow complain that the current parking problem can be resolved if the landlords would allow
the tenants to park in the existing garages located off-street. Many of the landlords lease
these garages to non-residents for storage, etc. I am addressing this problem to the Planning
and Zoning Department.
In the meantime, I would like to request that the Village Manager propose to the
Village Board a motion to direct the Chief of Police not to enforce the prohibition of
diagonal parking in the cul-de-sac on Ida Court. On October 17, 1978, the Village Board
adopted a similar motion which allowed the residents to park on the street overnight. I
believe that allowing the residents to park diagonally in the cul-de-sac will not adversely
affect overall safety and will satisfy the needs of the few people who are complaining.
Fred Tennyson el'
FT/m
xc: Jeff Wulbecker
y�O//c e (ralof Oa- /"/) I `/P0— ( Zoo , I., I / f
,/,z ckr,,o) J /0, h/C W, eA (A4el
zl-a z'Xi-r
e A- e
I've
MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT (C(D r" y
SAFETY COMMISSION Pi
OCTOBER 5, 1992 - 7:30 P.M.
1. CALL TO DRDU
The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called
to order at 7:32 P.M.
H. ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Lee Beening Chairman
Chris Lenz
Commissioner
Tom Daley
Police Dept.
Del Ulreich
Fire Dept.
Fred Tennyson
Engineering
Mel Both
Public Works
Absent: Andy Mitchell Commissioner
Art Coy Commissioner
Others in Attendance: See attached list
Tom Daley, seconded by Chris Lenz, moved to approve the Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of the Safety Commission held on July 6, 1992.
No citizens were present to be heard by the Safety Commission (other than
the citizens prepared to discuss the two items on the Agenda).
V. NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Cory Miller, resident at 804 E. Cedar Lane discussed the current problem
of vehicles speeding through the neighborhood. In particular, he noted the
travel pattern used by what appears to be "non-residents", who use Cedar
Lane and Crabtree Lane as a short-cut to by-pass the stop light at Wheeling
Road and Euclid Avenue Several of the residents who live along Crabtree
Lane cited cases of vehicles speeding on Crabtree Lane.
Page Two
Safety Commission Meeting
October 5, 1992
Tom Daley described the procedures the police follow to enforce speed Emits
in a residential area. Consensus of opinion by the Commission was to not
recommend installing Stop Signs. However, the Safety Commission did
recommend monitoring the speed of the vehicles during the peak traffic times.
MOW* and
Fred Tennyson presented a map outlining the current speed limits and
parking situations on the four streets surrounding the St. Raymond School and
Church area. He also presented a fist of proposed changes to the current
speed zones and parking configuration. (see attached list of proposals)
Janice Madrecki, member of the St. Raymond Safety Commission expressed
the concern of both the school and the church with regards to the parking
proposals. She admitted that at this time, the church and school are not in
agreement with each other. She requested that Village staff meet with
church and school officials to further discuss the parking problems around the
school.
Chris Lenz, seconded by Del Ulreich motioned to recommend the first three
proposals presented by Fred Tennyson to the adopted by the Village Board. These
proposals include:
1.) Install a 4 -way Stop Sip at the intersection of Milburn Avenue and
10ka Avenue.
2.) Install 20 MPH school zones on Milburn Avenue from Pine Street to
HiLusi Avenue.
3.) Install 20 MPH School Zones on l0ka Avenue from Shabonee Trail
to Evergreen Avenue.
Chris Lenz also motioned to have the Village staff discuss the current and
proposed parking situations with the St. Raymond Church and School officials.
The Safety Commission concurred.
Fred Tennyson presented and discussed the current safety hazard that exists
at the railroad and pedestrian crossing on Prospect Avenue near Maple Street
Page 3
Safety Commission Meeting
October 5, 1992
(see attached drawing). He stated that two accidents involving children on
bicycles darting into oncoming traffic have occurred this year. Mr. Tennyson
recommended that:
1.) The pay box be relocated from the east side of the railroad and
pedestrian walkway to the west side.
2.) Pay parking stall #1 be eliminated.
3.) Two 4 -hour parking stalls near the bicycle rack be eliminated.
4.) A crosswalk be striped across Prospect Avenue at the walkway.
Fred Tennyson also noted that he discussed these proposals with the local
businesses and received a favorable response.
Chris Lenz„ seconded by Tom Daley motioned to recommend that the Village Board
adopt these safety proposals.
•r•�; ,dam
Prior to adjournment Mr. Lee Beening requested that the Commissioners and
Village Officials notify Fred Tennyson if they are not able to attend a
meeting.
Having no further business the meeting was adjourned at 10:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
-.57A C.
c
m
41
0-3
Ild-I 6,-J.
loq 6 -
aa.? &W,442-1 4's..r�..
K&dkw
Proposed Traffic Sign Improvements
For Saint Raymond Church & School Area
1. 4—Way Stop Signs At Milburn Ave& I Oka Ave
2. 20 MPH School Zone East & West Bound
Hi Lusi Ave To Pine St
3. 20 MPH School Zone North & South Bound
Sha Bonee Tr To Evergreen Ave
4. No Parking Shcool Days 7:00 — 9:00 AM & 2:00 — 4:00 PM
2 HR Parking 9:00 AM — 2:00 PM
On:
a) South Side Milburn Ave I Oka Ave To Elmhurst Ave
b) East Side I Oka Ave Lincoln St To Milburn Ave
c) East Side Elmhurst Ave Lincoln St To Milburn Ave
5. No Parking Anytime
North side of Lincoln St Elmhurst Ave To I Oka Ave
tt�
z
O
U)
W
w
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM tkl(ln TM an us.,
10�pa
TO: Village Manager c: Director Public works
Water/Sewer Superintendent
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 15, 1992
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results, Transfer Switch
Huntington Sewer Lift Station
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 AM on October 13, 1992 for a
proposed contract to install a new 225 ampere transfer switch
and associated accessories at the Huntington Sewer Lift Station,
601 West Golf Road. This lift station was constructed in 1972
and services a major portion of the Village's sanitary sewer sys-
tem - approximately one-third of the area bound by Dempster,
Golf, Route 83 and Tamarack.
The transfer switch is a mechanical device that allows the lift
station pumps to be driven by an on-site, natural gas -powered
generator in the event of a power failure. This normally hap-
pens automatically. However, the existing equipment is inopera-
tive and, due to its age, parts are no longer available. We are
therefore requesting it be replaced.
Fourteen invitational bids were sent out, plus public notice was
published in the newspaper as required. Six bids were received;
results as follows:
Bidder Bid Price
Lyons Electric Company $6,995.00
Kendon Electric, Inc. 7,600 00
Hyre Electric Co. 7,700:00
Aldridge Electric, Inc. 9,270.00
K & M Mechanical Inc. 9,800.00
Adlite Electric Co., Inc. 10,185.00
Funding for this proposed purchase can be found in the Water/
Sewer budget on page 164, account no. 41-072-09-8011, in the
amount of $12,000.
I recommend acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by Lyons
Electric Co. in the amount of $6,995.
I dA),Q),At � A2_&9 1N
Herbert L. Weeks
GLA/td
TRNSFRSW.RES/FILES/BIDS
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W CM USA
TO: Village Manager T -)P t4T
/0 zo
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 15, 1992
SUBJECT: Fuel Bid Opening
On October 13, 1992, sealed bids were opened for the proposed
purchase of unleaded gasoline and diesel fuel for all Village
vehicles. The one-year contract is for estimated quantities of
123,000 gallons of unleaded gasoline and 32,000 gallons of die-
sel fuel.
Invitational bids were mailed to 19 vendors and a bid notice was
placed in local papers. Six bids were received with vendors
using the Oil Express Daily data sheets for pricing verification.
Bid specifications requested pricing for four (4) grades of
unleaded gasolines and No. 2 diesel fuel. Although the Village
reserves the right to purchase any grade of fuel during the term
of the agreement, I recommend the contract award be based on
pricing for regular lead-free (87 octane) and No. 2 diesel.
When we order fuel, we receive it in transport loads of 7500
gallons each. We normally order the regular no -lead gasoline,
but have alternated using mid -grade no -lead at a slightly higher
octane rating every three to four fill -ups. Cost of fuel per
gallon will vary according to market conditions as reflected in
the oil Express data sheets. Bid is based on estimated 123,000
gallons regular grade no -lead and 32,000 of diesel.
It is my recommendation that the new 1992/1993 fuel contract be
awarded to Royal Fuel Liquid Energies, Inc.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
FUEL92.RES/FILES/BIDS
Village of Mount Prospect
1992/93 Fuel Bid Opening Worksheet
Bid Opening: October 13, 1992 @ 10.00AM
Vendor
Fuel Type
Freight
Discount
Estimated
Total Contract
based on
Gallonage Bid
see below
Regular
Lead -Free
Gasoline
Mid -Grade
Lead -Free
Gasoline
Premium
Lead -Free
Gasoline
(92 Octane)
Premium
Lead -Free
Gasoline
(94 Octane
No. 2
Diesel
Fuel
Royal Fuel Liquid Energies Inc.
0.6654
0.7002
0.7499
nta
0.6565
'"0.0135
1% (10 days)
$ 101,824
Lake Cook Farm Supply
0.6699
0.7042
0.7334
nta
0.6348
incl.
none
$ 102,710
Avalon Petroleum Co.
0.6739
0.7087
0.7584
0.7684
0.6650
incl.
1% (10 days)
$ 103,128
Palatine Oil Co.
0.6660
0.6980
0.7460
nta
0.6720
incl.
none
$ 103,422
Bell Fuels Inc.
0.6786
0.7148
0.7630
nia
0.6484
"0.0165
none
$ 104,217
Onyx Petroleum Inc.
0.6809
0.7183
0.7634
nta
0.6515
incl.
none
$ 104,599
- Bell Fuels Inc. - freight charges added to price per gallon
'* - Royal Fuel - freight charges added to price per gallon
Estimated Total Contract =
( Regular Lead -Free Fuel Price X 123,000 Gallons ) + ( No. 2 Diesel Fuel Price X 32,000 Gallons) - Discount
VJL 10-15-92 [SYS2:SEAN\FUEL\BIOOPEN .XLS]
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
IF/ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM IMCMUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: October 12, 1992
SUBJ: Design Engineering Services
High Service Pump Replacement - Phase 4
For the past several years we have been phasing in modernization
and replacement of our high service pumps at our pumping sta-
tions. This work is being done as a result of a study on energy
efficiency of our high service pumps, which was completed and
accepted by the Village Board in 1987 by Greeley and Hansen
engineers.
Phase 4 of the original 6 phase program will involve the replace-
ment Of Pumping units Nos. 3 and 4 at our Pumping station No. 5
on Highland Ave. Both these pumps are part of the original
equipment that dates back to 1955. This will complete moderniza-
tion of this station where we have already replaced pump units
Nos. 1 and 2. Future planning is for replacement of pumps at
our No. 4 station on N. Waverly. There are 4 pumps there which
we are planning to replace over a two year period.
Attached is a proposal from Greeley and Hansen for engineering
services in connection with Phase 4 of this program. Engineer-
ing ser -vices would include design and preparation of contract
documents, bid review, shop drawing review, start-up testing,
final inspection and punch list follow-up. Greeley and Hansen
have quoted a price of $24,500 for these services.
On Page 160 of the 1992/93 budget there is $65,000 (Acct. #
41-072-05-8031) allocated in the water fund for this proposed
expenditure. $28,860.00 of these funds are already committed to
complete the Phase 3 pump replacements which was approved March,
1992. That leaves $36,140 to cover this contract. The money
for the actual pump replacement expenses for Phase 4 would come
from the future 1993/94 budget.
I recommend that the Village waive the bidding requirement and
accept the proposal of Greele and Hansen for $24,500.
Her ert Weeks
HLW/eh
Attachment
CC: Deputy Director of Public Works
Water Superintendent
Village Clerk
PUMPFOUR/FILES/WATER
TJHries
Enclosure
FOUNDED IN 1914
MRSELEV ANO HANSEN
P49TNEAS:
E tq G i tq E E R S
F_K,F SAL6OTTI
L-1001
' '_F,0S
1410 SOJIH WACKER DRIVE - CHICAGO, ILLINICZ 6060C -40M (3�2) 556.3J
WAJL P. HM
H-D"S
1--', E A -S.0,E
September 18, 1992
PCN
LLI..
C 615th
RO, S, J, CS01111
"SO:IAIM
-0- W. S"C.
R W -I.
,C- �M VOGEL
7-0—S E. "VILSDN, °t°'E-RI 1. 11AL"
Mr. Herbert L Weeks
I —9TH,
Director of Public Works
T P01 P
S EP—PDr
Village of Mount Prospect
V, JO.NSOI
1700 West Central Road
0 SILVAN
V, locH
NAaG M GBRULAT,
Mount Prospect, filinois 60056
ERIGO E 11LISCH
.1LEER
,`EEFH . CERVO�4e
Subject: High Service Pumps Replacement Phase 4
71, G;
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
for
High Service Pump Replacement Phase 4
GREELEY AND HANSEN
September 1992
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The PROJECT comprises furnishing engineering settices rainuirp.4, fartfio
[AM711F.Miro
WON NAM
NOW
B. SCOPE OF SERVICES BY GREELEY AND HANSEN
I. Field Survey and Basic Data:
Conduct field survey to obtain field measurements of piping and equipment, photograph
existing facilities, and review existing electrical power service and motor control center
facilities. Obtain available facility plan drawings and electrical schematic diagrams of existing
facilities,
2. Design Electrical and Mechanical Connections:
• Conduct hydraulic analysis and select pumping equipment.
• Evaluate alternative engine type's including natural gas fired and diesel fueled with
above ground storage tank. Provide a letter report comparing alternatives and
recommending replacement engine type.
• Layout mechanical piping connections for new pumps.
• Prepare electrical and instrumentation schematic diagrams.
• Determine motor starter modifications, select motor protection devices and size
electrical wires and conduit.
. Determine requirements and layout engine connections.
3. Contract Documents:
Prepare contract drawings and specifications for demolition work, installation of PUMPS, motor,
engine drive equipment, piping connections, electrical modifications, and instrumentation
modifications. Meet with Village staff to review preliminary contract documents, Provide
VILLAGE with 3 preliminary and 3 final copies of contract documents.
4. Opinion of Construction Cost:
Prepare opinion of probable construction cost prior to November 30, 1992.
s. Prepare Permit Applications for Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and Village Code
Enforcement Office.
6. Bid Review:
Review bids and prepare bid evaluation report.
7. Shop Drawing Review:
Review shop drawings submitted by Contractor during construction.
a. Site Visit During Construction:
Provide an engineer on-site for three visits during construction.
9. Start-up Testing and final Inspection:
Provide an engineer on-site to Monitor field testing by the Contractor for the new pumps,
engine drive and electrical support systems to be installed at Pump Station No. S. Conduct
a final inspection of contract work and prepare a punch list of items requiring correction.
10. Punch List Follow-up:
Monitor completion of punch list hems by Contractor.
C. SERVICES PROVIDED BY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1. Assemble basic data available from existing Village records.
2. Provide services of water operations supervisor to assist during field survey and start-up
testing.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND COMPENSATION
FOR
HIGH SERVICE PUMP REPLACEMENT PHASE 4
Greeley and Hansen
September 1992
A. ESTIMATED MANHOURS
Task
1. Field Survey and Basic Data
2. Design
3. Contract Documents
4. Opinion of Probable
Construction Cost
S. Permit Applications
6. Bid Review
7. Shop Drawing Review
8. Site Visits During Construction
9. Start—up Assist and Final
Inspection
10. Punch List
Total
B. ESTIMATED COMPENSATION
I. Estimated Direct Labor Costs
Partner 7 hrs.
Project Manager 58 hrs.
Project Engineer 217 hrs.
Text Editing 49 hrs.
Subtotal
2. Estimated Salary Costs, Overhead and Profit
Direct Labor x 2.0
3. Other Direct Costs
Local Travel 400 miles @ $0.28/mile
Printing, Reproduction, Film & Processing
Subtotal
Total Estimated Compensation -
@
Estimated Direct Labor —Hours
$350
@
Project Project
Text
Partner
1yna2er Enginee
Editing
0
3 20
0
2
8 55
2
3
10 60
35
0
1 10
2
0
2 8
2
0
4 8
2
2
12 26
2
0
4 12
0
0
10 10
2
0
4 8
2
7
58 217
49
B. ESTIMATED COMPENSATION
I. Estimated Direct Labor Costs
Partner 7 hrs.
Project Manager 58 hrs.
Project Engineer 217 hrs.
Text Editing 49 hrs.
Subtotal
2. Estimated Salary Costs, Overhead and Profit
Direct Labor x 2.0
3. Other Direct Costs
Local Travel 400 miles @ $0.28/mile
Printing, Reproduction, Film & Processing
Subtotal
Total Estimated Compensation -
@
$50.00
$350
@
$37.00
$2,146
@
$21.50
$4,666
@
$13.00
$637
$7,799
$15,598
$24.500
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
*1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM CM USA
TO: Village Manager -eo.
10 it 51 crz
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: October 13, 1992
SUBJ: Sewer Rehabilitation - Insituform
In the current water fund budget, there are funds allocated for
sewer repairs. Based on present pipe failures and our schedule
of proposed sewer system improvements, and as presented during
the budget hearings, the following sewers have extensive pipe
failures and need repair as soon as possible:
1. Newberry (east to west rear yard easement)
south of Greenwood.
Manhole #2 to #1.
12" diameter, 185 lineal feet with one
lateral and 100 ft. of heavy cleaning
Lump Sum Cost $14,230
2. Owen Street (between Evergreen and
Northwest Hwy.)
Manhole #1 to #2
24" diameter, 250 lineal feet with 12
laterals
Lump Sum Cost $41,080
3, Small Lane (between Stratton and Stevenson)
Manhole #8 to #7
8" diameter, 651 lineal feet with 11
laterals and 100 ft. of heavy cleaning.
Lump Sum Cost $30,560
Combined Total $85,870
All three of these segments of sewers have been locations.of
reoccurring sewer blocks, partially collapsed pipes, and continu-
al maintenance due to root growth at the joints. The line on
Newberry is located in a rear yard easement making access ex-
tremely difficult and the lines on small and Owen are located in
the parkway under large healthy trees.
The 2411 sewer on Owen is also the segment where we had a major
failure of the pipe which resulted in a major cave in April of
this year. The sewer is in'excess of 151 deep and we had to
hire a contractor to repair the pipe. Total cost was over
$20,000 to repair 25 feet of pipe and we also lost a healthy 28"
Elm tree.
There are still other sections of broken pipe along this segment
of sewer and unless we fix them now we may incur excessive re-
pair costs in the near future. The line between manhole #1 and
#2 has more failures than the line between Manhole #2 and the
chamber at Northwest Highway and therefore is being recommended
for this year's repair program.
As in the past I am proposing to repair these sewers using the
Insituform process of relining the existing sewer pipe without
the need to excavate. This liner will also restore the pipe
back to its original strength and integrity.
The Insituform process of sewer lining is an insertion method
where the liner is cured in place. The Village currently has
over 23,000 feet installed, with the first lines being installed
back in 1982. Insituform Midwest is the only contractor li-
censed and qualified to do this type of work in the Illinois,
area.
The cost to reline these sewers as quoted above is $85,870,
including lining, lateral reinstatement, cleaning, and removal
of any protruding taps. I therefore request the Village Board
waive the bidding process and award a contract to Insituform
Midwest, Inc. for a not to exceed amount of $85,870.
Funding for this proposed contract can be found an Pages 165,
Account # 41-072-11-8001 (Sewer Repairs) and 159, Account #
41-072-04-6290 (Emergency Repairs) where there is a total of
$90,000 allocated.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
cc: Deputy Director of Public Works
Water/Sewer Superintendent
SEWREBIN.SIT/FILF.S/SEWERS
V. q -.- ---
Irvalp
�'" rvm � �: i
z 76
5
ij
N
10 10
10)
SEWERS
C. U.
3-5 SE Ea„s 9'5 S.W."
P --r, Pq, ,-
42-11-35 G
3-!5 W.1/2 S.E.1/4 Sec. 35--,,--11
WHEELING
---I 20 -IV
------------
-----------
9
402
1/7 E.1/4 Sec. 35-42-11 42-11-35H
WHEELING
L -C
IAMI
17
tile*
SSPRY
Z 3 li 5 61
k t-7
ii
11
t
F
SMRW
1/7 E.1/4 Sec. 35-42-11 42-11-35H
WHEELING
L -C
IAMI
17
tile*
SSPRY
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois`
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 19, 1992
SUBJECT: SENIOR CENTER ADDITION
As discussed at the October 6 Village Board meeting, staff will be bringing forward the
results of the bid opening for construction of the Senior Center addition on Tuesday,
October 20. This item does not appear on the set Agenda because bids were not
opened until Monday, October 19. A Motion to add this item to the Agenda for
consideration would be appropriate.
Mr. Weeks' memo outlines in detail not only the results of the bid opening but also
identifies the other major phases of the project and how each phase will be handled.
You will note that much of the interior construction and finish work will be handled by
Public Works personnel at a substantial cost savings over contracting out same.
Mr. Weeks also identifies the need for additional funds to complete the project in total.
Staff is proposing that those additional funds be taken from existing line items -- mostly
maintenance and repair accounts. The transfer of those funds will not impact our overall
budgetary position nor limit our ability to respond to unanticipated situations.
I concur with Mr. Weeks' recommendations as outlined in his memo and would
respectfully request that the Board award the contract to the low bidder as well as
approve the overall construction/funding plan.
Or
MEJ/rcc
c: Director of Public Works Herbert Weeks
Director of Finance David Jepson
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 19, 1992
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results - Senior Center Addition
Sealed bids were opened an October 19, 1992 for construction of a 401 x
47' addition to the Senior Center. Eight invitational bids were sent out
in addition to advertising as required.
There were four bids from each bidder. The base bid was for shell only.
This included:
a. Base. All exterior walls, windows, doors, and roof. The heating and
ventilation unit was part of the roof structure and included a single
outlet providing free air to the open area excluding walls. It also
included all plumbing and electric for the HVAC equipment.
b. Optional second bid was for installing and finishing off interior
walls, ceiling, doors, and HVAC duct work.
c. Optional third bid was for carpeting/tile.
d. Optional fourth bid was for painting.
The following bids were received.
A B C D Total
Complete Options
Bidder Base Bid Interior Carpeting Painting A and B
Central Lakes
Construction Inc. $ 95,000 $52,000 $6,500 $4,000 $147,000
Martam Construction 106,312 46,000 4,400 6,200 152,312
HCC Hunsberger
Construction Co. 121,900 41,500 5,100 5,400 163,400
Tripani Construction
Company, Inc. 122,221 25,000 4,175 3,500 147,221
In the current budget, under account code 51-077-91-8034, there was
$120,000 allocated for this proposed work. As noted above, to build the
complete structure, including interior walls, our low bid would be well
over our budgeted amount. I recommend that the base bid of $95,000, as
submitted by Central Lakes Construction Co., be accepted. This is for the
shell of the building only.
In the above scenario, Village forces would complete the majority of the
interior at material costs only. We would be bidding to have the fire
sprinkling system installed in the new addition and the basement at an
estimated cost of $6400. Carpeting/floor coverings would also be contract-
ed out by securing firm quotes. once a color and pattern have been select-
ed, I'm confident we can get a good grade for under $4000. All other
supplies, such as dry wall, ceilings, electrical, interior doors, etc.,
would be purchased from various suppliers at our municipal discount and
installed by our forces. Nominal landscaping work would be done by Vil-
lage forces next spring and could be budgeted for in the 1993-94 budget.
The apparent low bidder, Central Lakes Construction Co., is known by our
architect and was rated as a good, reliable contractor. With weather
being an unknown factor, they project that the shell of the building would
be completed within two months. Funds for completion of the interior and
exterior will be close to, or slightly over, the allocation.
If you and the Village Board would agree to the use of additional alter-
nate funds, I would request that we consider heaving the contractor do
additional work which would expedite final completion. These items could
include:
a) dry wall/wood framing at $10,800
b) interior duct work for HVAC at 8,500
Village forces would still install dry wall, ceilings, doors, all paint-
ing, and electrical.
Allocated funding and alternate funding as follows:
1) Senior Center Addition: 51-077-91-8034
Budget Spent Available
$120,000 $7571 $112,429
2) HVAC Repairs (all buildings): 01-071-02-6119
Budget Spent Need Available
$25,000 $13,530- $3470 $8000
* includes $10,500 for Sr.Ctr. boiler
3) Other Public Building Improvements: 51-077-91-8030
Budget Spent Need Available
$25,000 $7000 $7000 $11,000
Total funding balance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $131,429
Proposed Projected Buildina Cost
Sprinkler system $6,400
Carpeting $4,000
Architectural inspection est. not to exceed $4,000
Base bid $95,000
Additional contracted work stated above $19,300
Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $128,700
hledle� OC/" "4 7;01
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
SR-CTR.RES/FILES/BIDS
ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION REGARDING BUILDING ADDITION
FOR SENIOR CENTER
References verified by Public Works:
Barrington middle school Steve Fields
Life Safety $450,000
Comments: Good to work with
Deerfield High School Edwin Kula
Drama Room $130,000
Comments: on time - good work - made changes as called for
after the fact
Salt Creek School Wolfgang Meister
Complete building $2.5 million
Comments: Owner was on top of complete project from start
to finish.
Estimated material cost for work remaining for Public Works
forces:
Dry Wall Boo
Ceiling Tile and Cross Members $ 1,700
Paint 300
Doors $ 1,200
Electrical $ 1,000
TOTAL $ 5,000