HomeMy WebLinkAbout4701_001Next Ordinance No. 4470 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Resolution No. 29-92
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, lst Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
02111� �*# -10 �5_
II. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
October 6, 1992
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald 'Skip* Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Clowes Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Wilks
IV. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, September 15, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: LEARNING DISABILITIES MONTH
B. PROCLAMATION: UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN DRIVE
C. PRESENTATION: VEHICLE STICKER DISPLAY FINALISTS
ALL
D. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: Police Department
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance deletes the Class -R" liquor
license issued to House of Scechwan, 10 N. Main,
due to the fact that the new owners will not
offer alcoholic beverages. (Exhibit A)
F. Appointments
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A ZBA 42-A-92, Text Amendment
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14
(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends the Zoning Ordinance to
require a special use permit for a non-residential
use in a residential district. (Exhibit B)
B ZBA 51-V-92, 1702 West Algonquin Road
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1702 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
This Ordinance grants a variation for Jameson's
Char House, to waive the required loading dock
and to reduce the number of non -conforming
parking spaces by one. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a
vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
IX.
C ZBA 54 -SU -92, 416 South Mo
lst reading of AN OADINANC
USE PERMIT FOR PROPERTY LO
MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
This ordinance grants a SP
allow a satellite dish ten
to be located in the, rear
Board of Appeals recommend
request by a vote of 6-0.
D. ZBA 58-V-92, 515 North Fairy
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 515
This Ordinance grants a vari
a front yard setback of 23,
the required 30 feet, in ord
porch with overhead roof. T
Appeals recommended granting
vote of 5-1.
E.
ZBA 55-V-92, 400 North Fores
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 400
This Ordinance grants a vari
five foot separation between
accessory structure, rather
10 feet, in order to constru
detached garage. The Zoning
recommended granting(this re
5-0.
Emerson
F. ZBA 62-V-92, 50 Sou
lst reading of AN 0
FOR PROPERTY LOCATE
This Ordinance gran
maximum lot coverag
permitted 75* and t
instead of the requ
a one-story additio
The Zoning Board of
these requests by a
G. lst reading of AN 0
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amen
a Special Use categ
(Charlie Club). Th
recommended denying
of 4-1.
AT 50 S
variat
of 90.0
allow 3
ed 55,
to the
ppeals
ote of
INANCE
F MOUNT
the Si
y for c
S
NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 59-Z-92 and ZBA 60 -SU -92
1. The Petitioner is requ(
property be re -zoned fi
permit the subdivision
into 2 lots in order t(
family homes. Also re(
Use to permit a 3 -car
30 feet wide, tapering
property line. The Zoi
recommended granting t]
vote of 6-0.
2. Request for modificati
Code to waive the requ
sidewalks, curb and gu
street lighting, and a
required lot depth. T
recommended granting t
vote of 7-0.
ospect Road
TING A SPECIAL
AT 416 SOUTH
Use permit to
in diameter
The Zoning
nting this
TING A VARIATION
H FAIRVIEW
n to allow
instead of
o construct a
oning Board of
s request by a
'ING A VARIATION
FOREST AVENUE
to allow a
principal and
the required
two -car
d of Appeals
by a vote of
TING VARIATIONS
EMERSON STREET
to allow a
instead of the
rking spaces,
rder to construct
or Citizen Center.
mmended granting
MENDING CHAPTER 8
PROSPECT
n'Code by creating
f7premise signs
iew Board
es-- by a vote
5 Edgewood Lane
Lg the subject
I. -X to R-1, to
.his large lot
Lstruct 2 single
.ed is a Special
re and driveway
1 feet at the
Board of Appeals
requests by a
om the Development
nts to install
street paving,
fication from the
an Commission
requests by a
9913r�
(Exhibit E)
(Exhibit F)
(Exhibit G)
(Exhibit H)
B. ZBA 63-V-92, 1028 Beechwood
1. The Petitioner is requesting variations to
allow a 27 foot wide driveway and lot coverage
of 40%, rather than the permitted 35%. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 7-0.
2. Request for modification from the Development
Code to allow a driveway apron 27 feet in
width, rather than the permitted 21 feet.
The Plan Commission recommended granting
this request by a vote of 5-0.
C. ZBA 66-V-92 and ZBA 67 -SU -92, 1430 Bonita
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use to
permit a 3 -car garage and variations to permit
driveway width of 26, 811 and a 48% lot coverage,
rather than the permitted 35%. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 7-0.
D. Request for modification from the Development Code
to waive the requirement to install sidewalks in
conjunction with this commercial property at
2016 East Euclid Avenue. The Plan Commission
recommended granting this request by a vote of
7-0.
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21
ENTITLED "BUILDING CODE' OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance authorizes any deposit balance
remaining after notification to be forfeited and
deposited in the Village's General Fund. (Exhibit J)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. One 50 foot aerial and body for Public Works
2. GVWR Truck Cab and chassis
3. Breathing Apparatus
B. Request to waive the bidding procedure and
authorize the purchase of deicing chemicals.
C. Request to waive the bidding procedure and
authorize replacing the boiler in the Senior
Citizen Center.
D. Request to authorize sewer repair on the
500 block of south Hi Lusi
E. Request to waive the bidding procedure and
authorize retaining a consultant for the
rehabilitation of the elevated water tank
on Northwest Highway,
F. Ratify expenditures involved with the
street improvement of Wildwood Lane
G. lst reading Of AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING CHARGES
FOR THE INSTALLATION OF SANITARY SEWER SERVICES
ON WILDWOOD LANE
This Ordinance authorizes the Village to
recapture a portion of the costs incurred for
the Wildwood Lane improvement, in conjunction
with the Pate Subdivision. (Exhibit K)
H. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Litigation
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SEPTEMBER 15, 1992
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
INVOCATION
$ 536,523
The invocation was given by Trustee Floros.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
--
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert,
APPROVE
moved to approve the minutes of the regular
MINUTES
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees
Parking System Revenue Fund
held September 1, 1992.
Risk Management Fund
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros
Vehicle Replacement Fund
Hoefert, Wilks
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
Nays: None
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.
Motion carried.
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Police & Fire Building Const.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse,
APPROVE
moved to approve the following list of bills:
BILLS
General Fund
$ 536,523
Refusal Disposal Fund
1,827
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
--
Community
Community Development Block Grant Fund 13,863
Illinois municipal Retirement Fund
70,923
Water & Sewer Fund
80,638
Parking System Revenue Fund
830
Risk Management Fund
49,752
Vehicle Replacement Fund
15,759
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.
14,142
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
428
Police & Fire Building Const.
7,879
Flood Control Revenue Fund
783,742
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
-
Flexcomp Trust Fund
5,172
Escrow Deposit Fund
9,048
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
-
Benefit Trust Fund
2,167
$1,592,693
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to FINANCIAL
accept the financial report for the period ending REPORT
August 31, 1992, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
1
o i/
,g
r; ! / 1
f
M
COMMUN C TIONSH CITIZENS TO BE BEARD
ASPEN PARK John B�oi�elli, Oneida, stated that the Park
Districyt;had r °;;ly installed a basket ball court in
Aspen akk,and, area is now attracting groups of
peoplelf/I fil theJ'r 7hours and causing a; problem in the
01
neighbo'rhoodl;Eorelli asked for additional police
patrol in the% �'a.
Mayor Farley ed that the Village is aware of
increased actiin that area and is working with
the Peek Distr to resolve the; problem.'
// Jr
LIONS PARK John Kennedy a, id that there be additional police
patrol r in the % %ns Park area.,
R i c h a r 4(ill, iendri 1537 E. Emmerson Street, had the
followi�ng� comm did not feel Commissions and/or
i
Boards p could � final decisions, reading from the
�ioo .
Plan :Cs issio��i'/�� �.nutes of August 5, 1992, where
° %p/„
members�of that ission stated they did not support
ll o
various✓ rComm�. dins of the Village having final
l r;
decisi� rautho r� he asked when the Village Board,
Plani?mmiss�D%� and Business Development and
Redeve]�apment i'� ission would be discussing the
develo�,�r ednt of� downtown triangle; he asked the
Mayor'�onszc 11 einstituting the Committee system;
and f' 41y, ;y111 -Hendricks asked when the voting
requirements w ,:be discussed.'
Mayorfa ey statd that discussions of these subjects
lU %/�%
will t� plac �
� the near future. Thee.. Mayor' also
stated1, Intiat not support. reinstituting the
Commi� V st � �e to the fact that a presentation
would f? re 1 fiefore the specific Committee and
that she press tion would have to be made before
TL
the ent� r Vsl� Board which would not simplify but
length fi lthe p S.
i �j
MAYOR' REk'ORT A�,��/
PROCLAMATION Mayor a,riey p ���l imed the week of October 4 - 11,
1992 a Fire P 'tion Week,
EMPLOYEE In acco dance w�� tthe annual celebration of
qu � "niversaries for Village employees,
RECOGNITION the �, enn3ai�1
MayoriFhkley ar r0rb Weeks, Director of Public Works,
511
presentd Cert ates and Plaques to the following
employjess
Gl n , A Ai 20 ' Years
Pey 20 Years
Army Paj„ sod Jr. 15 Years
Sa' ka M. 15 Years
J'o`i� E VY %r -real 15 Years
«Tames E sther 15 Years
R1; ?%ard E,'" `lini 5 Years
M:�hAel R �phenson 5 Years
,
%1 G,
HOUSEHOLD WASTE Herb e6,ks d the recent Household Waste
COLLECTION Colleto Days %�ponsored by the TEPA was very
succesw#,U! .' Ho old waste from 1,175 households was
collect°ed.J�,
1
APPOINTMENTS' Mayor Frey s that no appointments will be made
at thistme ? �j
i � OF
Page�2? SepiJ J er 15, 1992
f /%
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 36-V-92, 800 Ironwood Drive ZBA 38-V-92
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 800 IRONWOOD
would grant a variation to allow a 240 square foot
accessory building, rather than the 120 square
feet permitted.
Diane Gear, 709 Hackberry, stated that she lives
behind the subject property and opposes the request
based on possible drainage problems.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4467
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 800 IRONWOOD DRIVE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes
Nays: Floras, Hoefert, Wilks
Motion failed.
Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane, stated that
he opposed staff giving recommendations to the
Zoning Board of Appeals relative to requests.
ZBA 42-A-92, Text Amendment
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would require a Special Use Permit for non-
residential uses in a residential district. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
text amendment.
There was discussion as to whether the Village Board
should govern proposals of other elected Boards and
the suggestion was made to amend the text of the
Zoning Ordinance in order to address the specific
problem involved with converting an existing
residential dwelling unit into a church, or non-
residential use.
The consensus of opinion among the Board members was
that the Village Board should not attempt to govern
school or park districts, etc. but should address
the specific problem; namely the conversion of a
single family home to a church or non-residential
use.
The proposed Ordinance will be amended for the
second reading on October 6th.
ZBA 42-A-92
AMEND TEXT:
NON-RESIDENTIAL
USES IN
RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICTS
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that SELL PROPERTY:
would authorize the sale of vehicles no longer VEHICLES VIA
useful or necessary to the Village. The sale of AUCTION
these vehicles will take place at an auction to
be held in the Mount Prospect Public Works
Facility on October 17th.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved ORD.No. 4467
for passage of Ordinance No. 4467
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF
VILLAGE OWNED PROPERTY (VEHICLES)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 _ September 15, 1992
NSA I
% %'
%1
1j
j J �oi�.
, j
COMMONWEALTH di
An Ordinance wsSresented for second reading that
would �'
EDISON AGREEMENT A' ri tering into a; franchise' agreement
betwedh the V je and Commonwealth Edison.
j
NORD.NO.4468 Trustee floraf conded by Trustee Hoefert, moved frr
passage of OrdO� ce No. 4468
Adi
OR AUTHORIZING ADOPTION OF A
F�CHIS fy, E14ENT.BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MiUNT° PROT AND COMMONWEALTH EDISON
Upon rb1 call/es; Busse, Clawes, Floros,
%i Hoefert, Wilks
oyez None
Motioncarrie
AMEND CH. 5 An Ordxnance w resented for second reading that
CREATE ECONOMIC would 'mend Chi , 5 of the Village Code by
DEVELOPMENT creat�ngtan Ec'1,MI iic Development Commission.
f< i/, i;
COMMISSION��
Trustflu
s*sse,onded by Trustee Floros, moved
ORD.NO. 4469 for papsAge o ,� finance No. 4469
A ORDIN`�AMENDING CHAPTER 5 OF THE
V'U,AGE �� 'TO CREATE AN ECONOMIC
dLOPrr� ` OMMISSION
j r rlf�
Upon r 1A cal ]��%/� es: Busse, Floros, Hoefert,'
�g , Wilks
i" ys. Clowes
Motio c'arrie�'
228 & 230 SOUTH An Or,,,''/ nce „„� ;resented for first reading that
J�
PRAIRIE AVENUE would nd O �rrr�nce No. 4437 granting modifications
for prierty ed at 228 and -230'South Prairie
Avenue Tl,, f d
/�,i
Villa4j# Manag /`r nonis stated that Ordinance No. 4437
grantel9 l mods � ions from the Development Code
(Chap; 16) ./� he Ordinance did not include the
amour bf moi; to be pasted as a cash escrow for
impro x/ents ij Janonis stated that the entire area
where se t ��`�mes will be built is vacant property
and dc���, not GVillage water and/or sewer, Mr.
Janoni stat ;,that rather than requiring the
�2
devel st a cash escrow guaranteeing
insta % ation r %jarious 'improvement it may be more
approF'riate f ,Special Service Area to be created
r�
in the future° assess the entire neighborhood for
thesemipiove s.
Membe AI Of, j� Village Board concurred with the
recom** ndatio'%� f the Village Manager, which
elima ated th /; +ed to amend Ordinance No. 4437.
NEW BihalWEss l f
ZBA 51-V-92 ZBA 5 ti=92, ,West Algonquin Road
r
1702 ALGONQUIN RD The Ptttione Gj%requesting a variation to waive the
requied load M�and _to reduce the number of non -
%fir
confo _i;hg pa�'�� g spaces by one. The"Zoning Board of
ty a
Appea7lrreco$d granting these requests by a vote
TrusteJBusse%/ conded'by TrusteeHoefert, moved
f% 11
AIR
of
r" %)
Pa `4 S mber 15, 1992
,
I %
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented October 6th for
first reading.
ZBA 54 -SU -92, 416 S. Mount Prospect Road ZBA 54 -SU -92
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use permit 416 MOUNT PROSPECT
to allow a satellite dish ten feet in diameter to ROAD
be located in the rear yard. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a
vote of 6-0.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the Special Use requested
in ZBA 54 -SU -92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented October 6th for first
reading.
ZBA 58-V-92, 515 North Fairview
ZBA 58-V-92
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a
515 FAIRVIEW
front yard setback of 231 611, instead of the
required 301, in order to construct a porch with an
overhead roof. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 5-1.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the variation requested in
ZBA 58-V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Wilks
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented October 6th for first
reading.
ZBA 55-V-92, 400 North Forest Avenue
ZBA 55-V-92
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
400 FOREST
a five foot separation between the principal and
accessory structure, rather than the required 10 feet,
in order to construct a two -car detached garage.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
Page 5 - September 15, 1992
2 f"
t % /ii
i Ali
�
i„
concu,r/�wYth thtrl'1���0ommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeanc grrf�Ithe variation requested in
ZBA 55,i,/",/ t92
Upon r4 calf, as: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
lID Wilks
Gys: Hoefert
% �'
�"
Motion d
�rrieJ'
f� i l�
G f
An Ordnance wbe presented October 6th for first
readin
/(
ZBA 62-V-92 ZBA 62�9�, 5�r��uth Emerson Street: (Senior Center)
50 S.EMERSON The Pe ",oner,llage of Mount Prospect) is
SENIOR CENTER requesxg var ""ons to allow amaximum lot coverage
of 90.y"rat hon the permitted 75%, and to allow
30 parting slag ;rather than the required 55 spaces,
in or d a�j to tact a ane-story, addition to the
existig"buil "�;" The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommnc ed g ,ng the variations. requested by a
vote o-0 Nlli
"
,J
TrustFusse, onded.by Trustee Floras, moved to
concur h th I commendation of the Zoning Board of
rl� Gi
Appeal %nd gr 'the variations requested in
ZBA 62`Vr.
Upon r ca11J'1� as: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
W1, Hoefert, .Wilks
s : None
Motioncarr ed� /
j f�/An 4rdn",,npresented w ��he resented October 6th for first
readin'lT/ A/ /IM�
Al
1,
HOUSING A Ras0*66 n w resentedthat sets forth the
'g i
AFFORDABILITY annual report the Comdprehensive Housing
REPORT A f f o r 1iiy �tegy Report.
It wasj doted x the Plan Commission had reviewed
r ii fj D1i/i "
this r+pq'"rt an ; commended adoption.
g 1 I,`
RES.NO. 27-92 Trusted be er �%�
,�� econdedby Trustee. Floros, moved
for pasage ofGGG/elution No. 27-92
A jR SOLUT1 f j ACKNOWLEDGING THE ANNUAL
C,;MPREHE$ F % HOUSING AFFORDABILITY
5RIATEGY o RT
Upon r/11.,, call Vis: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
% 1, Hoefert, Wilks
js None
, %
Motion</cataria
I i' i%`
H.O.M.E. A Reso u ion ', esented that would authorize
INVESTMENT axacut o"°of a�,�a eement between the village :and
PARTNERSHIP the Ii .O.E I +�tment Partnership Consortium.
P"
RES.NO. 28-92 Truste� G
taro � conded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
f , /
Pag"- Suer 15, 1992
fj
ii �I
for passage of Resolution No. 28-92 1
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE COOK
COUNTY HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP CONSORTIUM
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A recommendation from staff was presented to accept
PUBLIC
the improvements installed in conjunction with
IMPROVEMENTS:
the Rand Plaza Shopping Center, 301 East Rand
RAND PLAZA
Road.
301 E. RAND RD
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and accept the improvements
installed in conjunction with the construction
of Rand Plaza, 301 East Rand Road.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager Michael E. Janonis presented bid
BID RESULTS:
results.
The following bids were received for the furniture
FURNITURE:
to be used in the new Police and Fire Headquarters
Building, 112 East Northwest Highway:
Bidder Amount
Henricksen & Company, Inc. $369,868.00
Interiors 2000, Inc. 376,647.00
Thomas Interior Systems, Inc. 390,812-02
Corporate Office Systems 448,085.42
It was noted that the apparent low bidder, Henricksen,
had substituted major categories of furniture, even
though the specifications did not allow for
substitutions.
Mr. Janonis stated that he would review the furniture
being requested and make a final determination as to
whether any items could be eliminated.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
INTERIORS
reject all bids received for the Police and Fire
2000, INC.
Headquarters furniture and accept the bid submitted
by Interiors 2000, Inc. for the furniture in an
amount not to exceed $376,647.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - September 15, 1992
a C Ag jo
31
l J %IO/
/ l " l
STUMP CUTTER The foillowing were received for a stump cutter
for the fubli % r s Department:
oiIA
A=Unt w
�;
Vermee� �.1�.n �� � $14,500.170
/� ;`
Rayco a ufac � �' 13,111.04
Itwa nate �� l at the bid submitted by Rayco
ManufaJq, ring l of meet the specifications and the
machir4r,', bid',"d "d not be used by, the Public Works
Depart*ditt �% �
A
VERMEER-ILLINOIS Truste 1owe ���U, conded by Trustee Floras, moved to
reject/tne:bid ceived for a stump cutter and accept
the b l;�submA't d" by Vermeer-Illinois for a stump
" 1 �y��
cutter 3.x1 an a.' 0 n, not to exceed $14,500.00
Upon rfil, ca1�ass., Busse, Clowes, "Floros,
11 Hoefert, Wilks
o Jys : None
r j
Off
r r
Motion chrrie 1 f
i
Mr. nonxs tLained that with the national
electi/6ns, ma /ndidates post their campaign signs
on po 1 91local, F' n Village rights-of-way, which is
against ;the C �� ge Code. He explained that the
Villagi11 �rce the Code and arrangements have
�,�ial/l�
been 'm�r 0 to /�,,o e any sign displayed illegally.
rr
TrustedIoefer ; ` ked that the Village Manager provide
him wktkt the t %owing information: a list of the
contraters w gan construction within the Village
withot ,r�irsti� wing obtained a permit; a status
re ortl d,p the J ce being installed' on South Maple
Street, ihatl d j t meet the height requirements; and
the ei tus of Qving the obstructions placed "n the
r ,
rightf way i// aunt Prospect Road.
'11, vkk,i,
EXECUTIVE SESSION EXBCUTz , SLS�Wb
41, / rt/iii v
Trusteh kilks' bonded by Trustee Floros, moved to go
i,. � S'
into ��ut�.v y�,�ssian for the purpose of discussing
Perso nT0A,
Upon1 cal / des Busse, Clowes, Floros,
OK Hoefert, Wilks
ays: None
Motiorj csarr�e
Mayor Virley iavened the meeting at 10:53 P.M.
p l%
Prese upon �icall; Mayor Farley
j f Trustee Busse
Trustee Clowes
t "
Trustee Floros
/
/l Trustee Hoefert
„ll Trustee Wilks
ADJOURN liDJfie% bez gNT
,r%� rther business to come before the
TherVilla Boards; yor Farley ad j'Darned the meeting.
i"
The m+ding a � � reed at 10:54 P.M.
o/ is %
i`gg
f hi `rolA. Fields
flf111age Clerk
In
Pac f8 Smber 15, '` 1992
elf
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
September 30, 1992
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
9/11/92 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
9/10/92
9/30/92
List of Bills
Entry 9130/92
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,615,994
$1,134,471
$ 585,488
$ 2,164,977
Refuse Disposal Fund
37,988
407,059
223,776
221,271
Motor Fuel Tax
520,721
0
178,431
342,290
Community Development Block Grant Fund
634
24,000
24,287
347
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
245
161,637
13,034
148,848
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,289,032
331,412
401,949
3,218,495
Parking System Revenue Fund
203,316
10,128
5,384
203,316
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,270,622
22,512
151,219
1,141,915
Vehicle Replacement Fund
908,049
0
1,255
906,794
CCi ittai Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,492,815
138,114
65,982
1,564,947
Downtown Redev Const Funds
554,493
100
68
554,525
Police & Fire Building Construction
4,134,823
0
264,773
3,870,050
Flood Control Construction Fund
3,905,103
350
25,347
3,880,106
Debt Service Funds
909,999
396,147
0
1,306,146
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
4,502
4,588
0
9,090
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,294,436
22,785
25,474
1,291,747
Police Pension Fund
17,778,172
45,072
41,472
17,781,772
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,698,944
271,172
47,118
19,922,998
Benefit Trust Funds
236.799
0
-Q
236.799
LUIL,243
$2,969.547
2 5,057
-0- $58.766,433
V1N�101i1
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AAH-HA WEIDNER
ADVERTISING PRODUCTS
AFFILIATED REALTY
ALLTEMP FIREPLACE
ASTRO AMUSEMENT
MEL BOLDT AND ASSOC., INC.
JERRY BRANDT
C. M. CORP.
CAIRNS & BROTHERS INC.
V.J. CENTRACCHIO & SON INC.
CHICAGO ENV. SYSTEMS INC.
CHICAGO SIGN DESIGN, INC.
CITIBANK, N.A.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR
COURTESY HOME CENTER
D & D HOME IMPROVEMENTS INC
D & L CONSTRUCTION
D.P. ASSOCIATES
DEBOIS PAVING CO.
DESIGNfBUILD CONCEPTS
GONZALO C-. DIAGO
JOHN DIOLITSIS
DISBURSEMENT ACCT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C11630 AAH-HA WEIDNER
$100.00
C8453 AAH-HA WEIDNERS
$100.00
$200.00
1597 ADVERTISING PRODUCTS
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$47.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.75
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$222.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$22.25
$297.00
C11571 ALL TEMP FIREPLACE
$75.00
$75.00
C11631 ASTRO AMUSEMENT
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$49.90
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.98
$54.88
C11326 BRANDT
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT
$40.00
$40.00
HELMETS
$1,279.10
$1,279.10
C11704 VJ CENTRACCHIO
$100.00
$100.00
C11555 CHICAGO ENV
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
1608 CHGO SIGN DESIGN
$100.00
$100.00
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB
$100.35
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB
$900.52
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB
$3,454.50
$4,455.37*
PMT PIR 9/17
$224.25
$224.25*
RE TAXES 00-108 NW HWY
$51,873.44
$51,873.44*
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$160.00
$160.00
C11285 D&D HOME IMP
$100.00
$100.00
C11247 D&L CONST
$100.00
$100.00
1609 DP ASSC
$100.00
1610 DP ASSOCIATES
$100.00
$200.00
REFUND LICENSE OVERPMT
$17.50
$17.50
C11048 DESIGN/BUILD
$25.00
$25.00
PARKING FINE REFUND
$20.00
$20.00*
C11012 DIOLITSIS
$35.00
$35.00
P/R ENDING 9/17/92
$437,280.73
P1R ENDING 9117/92
$1,298.76
P1R ENDING 9117/92
$758.70
PZR ENDING
$ 242.69
P/R ENDING 9/177 92
$1,922.52
$478,503.40*
vla,Ioli7U
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO.
J. FAKO
DIANA FOSCO
VINCENT FREDRICO
LORI FRIGHETTO
THOMAS GALASSINI
GEISER-BERNER
GENERAL BLDG. SERV. CORP.
BRUCE GODFRAY
GRANTWELL CONST.
GREAT ROOMS
HELMINSKI & COMPANY
MARK HORNING
IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE
WAYNE JANUS
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
ALBERT L. KIRST
KEVIN J. KOERNER
L.J. KEEFE CO., INC.
LAKE -COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY
GARY M. LAMANTIA
LAUREL CONSTRUCTION
ALAN LAWSON
RUSSELL LEHE
RONALD A. LESNIAK
INES LEVINSON
ANTHONY J. LYDON
M J CONTRACTORS & REMOD., INC.
M.A.J. CONSTRUCTION
MARY S. MILLER
LESLIE M. MILLHOLIN III
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BADGES
$348.90
$348.90
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$22.50
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$2.25
$24.75
C11439
DIANA FASCO
$100.00
$100.00
C11517
FREDRICO VINCENT
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND
DUPLICATE PAYMENT
$40.00
$40.00
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
$540.00
$540.00
C11361
GEISER BERNER
$100.00
$100.00
C11531
GENERAL BLDG
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$30.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$3.00
$33.00
C10593
GRANTWELL
$100.00
$100.00
C11209
GREAT ROOMS
$100.00
$100.00
C11073
HELMINSKI & CO
$35.00
$35.00
C11474
HORNING
$35.00
$35.00
OCT 92
PAYROLL
$216.00
$216.00
REFUND
FILING FEE
$100.00
$100.00
PMT P/R 9/17$254.00
$254.00
IMRF LLIFE
INS-REFUND=KIRST
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
$482.00
$482.00
REFUND
STICKER OVERPMT
$40.00
$40.00
GASOLINE
$7,120.54
$7,120.54
C11381
LAMANTIA
$100.00
$100.00
C11275
LAUREL CONST
$100.00
$100.00
C11513
LAWSON
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND
TRANSFER STICKER
$2.00
$2.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$10.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$1.00
$11.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$15.00
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$1.50
$16.50
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$1.50
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$15.00
$16.50
REFUND
DUPLICATE LICENSE
$17.50
$17.50
C11543
MAJ CONSTRUCTION
$100.00
$100.00
C11637
MILLER
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND
DUPLICATE STICKER
$40.00
$40.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
FRANCIS MILLS
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$10.00
$11.00
MODERN COBBLER SHOP, INC.
1618 MODERN COBBLER
$100.00
$100.00
STEVE MUNRO
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$15.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.50
$16.50
NATIONAL DECORATING SERVICE
REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT
$17.50
$17.50
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/10
$10.08
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/10
$1,498.14
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/10
$257.25
SAVINGS BONDS P/R 9117
$500.00
DUE FED DEP P/R 9/17
$1,486.26
DUE FED DEP P/R 9/17
$129.65
DUE FED DEP P1R 9/17
$11,536.39
DUE FED DEP PZR 9/17
$98.18
DUE FED DEP P/R 9/17
$57.59
DUE FED DEP P/R 917
$2,780.52
$18,354.06*
JOHN NIELSEN
REFUND OVERPAYYMEN
$40.00
$40.00
NTI, INC.
011617 NTI INC
$25.00
$25.00
JOSEPH P. PASSI
REFUND DUPLICATE STICKER
$40.00
$40.00
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
SEPT POLICE PENSION DISB
$41,471.80
SEPT FIRE PENSION DISB
$47,117.53
$88,589.33*
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$18.73
$18.73*
PIERCE BUILDERS
011013 PIERCE BLDRS
$100.00
$100.00
MILAN PLAVSIC
REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT
$40.00
$40.00
A. L. RACINE
011626 A.L.RACINE
$100.00
$100.00
RAC CORP.
011595 RAC CORP
$75.00
$75.00
CHARLES L. REID III
REFUND DUPLICATE STICKER
$40.00
$40.00
KYLE W. REPP
C11515 KYLE REPP
$100.00
$100.00
MARK RISCH
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.88
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$18.82
$20.70
DOMENICO SAETTONE
06992 SAETTONE DOMENICO
$450.00
06992 SAETTONE DOMENICO
$50.00
$500.00*
YASMIN SAGANI
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$5.65
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.57
$6.22
WILLIAM SCHMIDT
09863 SCHMIDT
$50.00
$50.00
SEMAR HOME BUILDERS
011229 SEMAR HOME BLDRS
$500.00
$500.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ANDREW SHILLINGTON
C11335 SHILLINGTON
$100.00
$100.00
STANLEY L. STANKIEWICZ
C11618 STANKIEWICZ
$35.00
$35.00
MARY STIVER
C11755 STIVER MARY
$100.00
$100.00
SUNDAHL PLUMBING
C11480 SUNDAHL PLBG
$100.00
$100.00
JOHN SZYMANEK
C11319 J.SZY14ANEK
$50.00
$50.00
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
S2 BOND MONEY
$4,590.00
S3 BOND MONEY
$900.00
S4 BOND MONEY
$2,125.00
S5 BOND MONEY
$975.00
$8,590.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TRANS TO POLICE PENSION
$195.68
$195.68
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TRANS TO ESCROW DEP FUND
$50.00
$50.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
920912 TR TO WATER
57.64
TR TO WATER/SEWER FUND
$7,861.52
870707 WOLF POINT REALTY
$777.91
$7,897.07
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
C11048 DESIGN/BUILD
$75.00
C11319 SZYMANEEK
$50.00
C11571 ALL TEMP FIREPLACE
$25.00
C11595 RAC CORP
$25.00
C11617 NTI INC
$75.00
C9863 SCHMIDT
$50.00
1051- DOYLE -SIGNS
$100.00
900322 FORFEITED FUNDS
$12.50
REPLACEMENT CK #44714
$75.00
$487.50*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TRANS TO GENERAL FUND
$25,859.04
TRANS TO GENERAL FUND
$2,000.00
TRANS TO GENERAL FUND
$5,786.85
TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND
$490.00
TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND
$26,750.00
TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND
$500.00
$61,385.89
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO IMRF FUND
$784.26
TR TO IMRF FUND
$345.52
TR TO IMRF FUND
$257.09
TR TO IMRF FUND
$7,848.43
TR TO .IMRF FUND
$171.32
$9,406.62
VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT FIRE PE
TRANS TO FIRE PENSION
$75.67
$75.67
VULCAN BASEMENT WATERPROOFING
C11481 VULCAN BASEMENT
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9130192
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
EDWARD WALTER
C11281 EDWARD WALTER
$100.00
$55.00
$55.00
C11320 WALTER
$50.00
$66.00
C11353 WALTER
$100.00
$250.00
WALLEM CONSTRUCTION
C10710 WALLEM CONST
$100.00
$100.00
DONALD C. WEIBEL
BICENTENNIAL LUNCH
$103.01
$103.01
WICKERSHAM & ASSOCIATES
C11633 WICKERSHAM
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
CARY YETS PLUMBING
011715 CARY YETS PLBG
$100.00
$100.00
WAYNE L. ZEDIKER
C9638 ZEDIKER
$100.00
$100.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$750,607.61
GENERAL FUND
$456,607.64 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$2,906.42
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$1,654.03 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$13,034.53
WATER & SEWER FUND
$101,245.98 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE
FUND
$3,487.61
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$4,455.37 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$53,152.54
POLICE PENSION FUND
$41,471.80 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$1,035.07
$47,117.53
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$25,474.16
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
FLOWERS
- FRONTZAK
$55.00
$55.00
CRYSTAL CATERING, INC.
DINNER MEETING
$66.00
$66.00
FANNIE MAY CANDIES
82 BOXES
CANDY
$623.20
$623.20*
VITO G. GLAZERS
VEHICLE
STICKER
CONTEST -#3
$25.00
$25.00
MARK W. HUTCHINSON
VEHICLE
STICKER
CONTEST -#4
$25.00
$25.00
TERRI MALKOWSKI
VEHICLE
STICKER
CONTEST -#1
$100.00
$100.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$90.87
$90.87*
LAURY YOUNGQUIST
VEHICLE
STICKER
CONTEST -#2
$50.00
$50.00
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
***TOTAL**
$1,035.07
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30(92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$1,035.07
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ARNSTEIN & LEHR
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$265.40
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$37.55
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$1,615.12
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$188.70
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$221.20
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$588.75
AUGUST. LEGAL SERVICES
$123.50
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$388.50
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$3,952.40
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$59.40
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$360.45
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$112.60
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$91.60
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$1,193.25
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$77.70
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$423.20
$9,699.32
AWARDS INTERNATIONAL COMPANY
SfS AWARDS
$30.50
$30.50
IRENE F. BAHR
AUUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$321.50
$321.50
EDWARD CAVELLO
EXPENSES
$153.94
$153.94
ICMA
1 COPY OF CITIZEN SURVEYS
$59.00
$59.00
DAVID C. JEPSON
ADVANCE EXPENSES IL GFOA
$171.60
$171.60
THOMAS F. MCGUIRE AND ASSOC.LT
LEGAL SERVICES
$195.29
$195.29
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$14.65
EXPENSES
$68.20
EXPENSES
$10.00
$92.85*
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
SUPPLIESJTRAINING%MEETING
$84.07
$84.07*
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MEMBER Dtt11ES-MORGAN
$195.00
$195.00
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
2 NAME BADGES
$28.57
$28.57
BARRY A. SPRINGER
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$438.75
$438.75
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
AUGUST LEGAL FEES
$5,238.11
$5,238.11
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$16,708.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9%30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $16,708.50
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
GLORIA BARLETTA
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
CORTEZ DIXON
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
EDWARD FRANCE
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$31.06
$31.06
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE
$411.72
SERVICE
$186.32
$598.04
CAROLYN A. MILLER
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
MULTICHANNEL NEWS
1 YR SUBSCRIPTION
$58.00
$58.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
.$44,27
$5.00
$49.27*
WALTER SOSIN
COMMNSES ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$886.37
GENERAL FUND
$886.37
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GASB ORDER DEPARTMENT
ORIGINAL PRONOUNCEMENTS
$40.00
$40.00
GOLDSTEIN & ASSOCIATES
3 IL PENSION CODE BOOKS
$72.00
$72.00
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
PAPER
$633.50
$633.50
METRO EXPRESS, INC.
DELIVERIES
$33.70
DELIVERIES
$47.80
DELIVERIES
$40.45
$121.95
NCR CORPORATION
CASH REGISTER TAPE
$109.29
$109.29
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$10.63$10.63*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9130/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
PROGRAMMING SERVICES
$715.00
$715.00
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$51.47
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$27.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$20.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$81.22
$180.64
U.S. ADVISORY COMM. ON INTG.RE
PUBLICATION
$10.00
$10.00*
V & G PRINTERS INC.
ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORTS
$898.00
$898.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$2,791.01
GENERAL FUND
$2,791.01
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
COOK COUNTY CLERK
NOTARY PUBLIC COMMISSION
$10.00
$10.00
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
PLAQUES
$826.04
PLAQUES
$18.63
$844.67
MUNICIPAL CLERKS OF ILLINOIS
DUES
$60.00
$60.00
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
NEWSLETTER PAPER
$1,441.50
NEWSLETTER PAPER
$455.70
$1,897.20
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$65.93
LEGAL PAGE
$68.57
LEGAL PAGE
$73.85
LEGAL PAGE
$68.57
LEGAL PAGE
$73.85
LEGAL PAGE
$79.12
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
LEGAL PAGE
$81.76
LEGAL PAGE
$65.93
LEGAL PAGE
$73.85
LEGAL PAGE
$65.93
$780.66
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$3,592.53
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $3,592.53
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD
JULY CREDIT PPO SVC FEE
$11.25 -
AUGUST PPO SERVICE FEE
$25.50
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 9/15
$43,139.65
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 9/21
$75,611.53
MED CLAIMS THRU 9/25
$12,330.36
$131,095.79*
FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE
OCTOBER LIFE INSURANCE
$2,143.68
$2,143.68*
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
REIMBURSEMENT
$319.75
$319.75
HMO ILLINOIS
OCTOBER HEALTH INSURANCE
$8,824.15
HEALTH INSURANCE CHANGES
$370.68
$9,194.83
LUTHERAN GENERAL MED. GROUP,SC
SERVICES-WISNIEWSKI
$65.00
$65.00
MERCK SHARP & DOHME
87 VIALS RECOMBIVAX
$2,505.60
$2,505.60
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
PLATE CHARGE
$25.00
$25.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SERVICES-SZONN FAVIA
$448.00
448.00*
RISK RESOURCES
RISK MGMT SERVICES
$500.00
500.00
SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO.
S-25 WINDSHIELD GLASS
$381.45
$381.45
HERMANN SZONN
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
$14.90
$14.90*
MONICA THOMS, M.D., F.A.C.S.
SERVICES-ERSKINE
$45.00
$45.00
MICHAEL T. WERNER
REIMBURSEMENT
$25.00
$25.00
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ***TOTAL** $146,764.00
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $146,764.00
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
ALPINE CAMERA CO., INC. PHOTO SUPPLIES $180.56 $180.56
WILLIAM L. AMUNDSEN ADVANCE EXPENSES $1,082.20 $1,082.20*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
DUPAGE MAYORS AND MGRS. CONF.
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
NATIONAL BUSINESSWOMEN'S LDRSH
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROF. ENGI
NCSBCS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
STEEL STRUCTURES TECH. CEN.INC
TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
JEFFREY WULBECKER
XEROX CORPORATION
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
PEST CONTROL SERVICE
PEST CONTROL SERVICE
PEST CONTROL SERVICE
PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTROL
BROCHURES
PRINTING CHARGES
PRINTING CHARGES
ELEVATOR REPORT FORMS
SEMINAR -VAN DORNICK
MEMBER RENEWAL-BENCIC
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
LICENSE RENEWAL-BENCIC
REGISTER JAKES AMUNDSEN
1992 RESURFACING PROGRAM
ELEVATOR RE -INSPECTION
ELEVATOR PLAN REVIEW
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
LICENSE RENEWAL
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
SUPPLIES
$3,502.89 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
$80.00
$80.00
$80.00
$60.00
$260.00
$70.00
$317.00
$172.00
$189.00
$49.00
$198.00
$75.00
$10.62
$13.29
$7.19
$40.00
$190.00
$1,363.35
$27.00
$50,00
$39.47
$11.87
$40.00
$51.84
$128.85
***TOTAL**
PAGE 10
TOTAL
$240.00
$320.00
$70.00
$678.00
$49.00
$198.00
$75.00
*
*
$31.10*
$40.00
$190.00
$1,363.35
$77.00
143.18
128.85
$4,866.24
$1,363.35
********************************************************************************************************
v1;piitole) N
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
LANCE BESTHOFF
BOB'S RELOADING INC.
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
COMPUSERVE, INC
WALTER W. CRIBBINS CO.
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
D -B ENTERPRISES
ENTENMANN-ROVIN CO.
FIRE INVESTIGATORS STRIKE FORC
THE FOUNDATION PRESS, INC.
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
HHI INC.
HINES PRODUCTS CORP.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE ACADEMY
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
MAUREEN KERRIGAN
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
EXPENSES
AMMUNITION
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
SERVICES RENDERED
SERVICES RENDERED
BUMPER STICKERS
BICYCLE REGISTRATION FORMS
PENCILS
BADGES
GIBSON/RAMHOLZ/RIORDAN
PUBLICATIONS
AUG 92 CARWASHING
TIRES
JULY 92 FILM PROCESSING
AUG 92 FILM PROCESSING
MTCE & COPIES
MTCE & COPIES
MTCE & COPIES
FIRING RANGE MTCE
WOOD RULERS
SERVICE
PAPER
TUITION-KERRIGAN
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
ADVANCE EXPENSES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
INVOICE AMOUNT
$13.28
$14.95
$50.22
$112.99
$39.00
$2,309.40
$23.80
$119.19
$30.50
$6.59
$10.00
$216.11
$295.40
$158.69
$95.10
$75.00
$38.00
$412.00
$1,017.60
$49.51
$27.14
$174.15
$117.11
$121.30
$274.50
$431.50
$149.41
$232.50
$254.00
$82.45
$100.00
$232.74
$11.56
$79.50
$338.06
$155.26
PAGE 11
TOTAL
$191.44
$39.00
$2,309.40
$173.49
$16.59
$216.11
$295.40
$158.69
$95.10
$75.00
$38.00
$412.00
$1,017.60
$76.65
$412.56
$274.50
$431.50
$149.41
$232.50
$254.00
$82.45
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30%92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PARTS
$2.72
$819.84
LAW ADVISORY GOVT. ED., INC.
TUITION-NAGEL
$95.00
$95.00
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$52.04
PARTS
$37.06
PARTS
$14.98
PARTS
$14.98
PARTS
$65.28
PARTS
$14.98
PARTS
$35.12
CREDIT
$35.58-
$198.86
LITTLE AMERICA
PRISONER FOOD
$53.90
$53.90
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
SUPPLIES
$99.36
SUPPLIES
$99.00
SUPPLIES
$99.00
SUPPLIES
$99.00
SUPPLIES
$179.90
SUPPLIES
$69.18
$645.44
LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$113.35
$113.35
METROMEDIA PAGING SERVICES
PAGER RENTAL
$346.50
$346.50
MIDWESTGANG_INVESTGTRS_ASSN_.
MEMBERSHIP GIBSON
$10.00_
$10.00
MINUTEMAN PRESS
TOWING CARDS
$178.00
$178.00
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
MICE SUPPLIES
$35.00
$35.00
NORTH SUBURBAN JUVENILE OFFCRS
REGISTRATIONS
$60.00
$60.00
NOVA CELLULAR
SERVICE
$22.25
$22.25
RAY O'HERRON CO., INC.
TEST RECORD CARDS
$128.58
INTOXILYZER MOUTHPIECES
$245.28
LEG IRONS
$40.05
$413.91
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$2.15
MISC EXPENSES
$4.47
MISC EXPENSES
$124.73
MISC EXPENSES
$26.59
MISC EXPENSES
$9.76
MISC EXPENSES
$16.05
MISC EXPENSES
$2.20
MISC EXPENSES
$1.38
MISC EXPENSES
$5.13
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ERIC E. PIEE
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
SAVE -A -PET
SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATOR
ROBERT SMITH
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
WOLF CAMERA AND VIDEO
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Cef�3LN;7:l ��IiI]E
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
RADIO REPAIRS
AUGUST 92 STRAYS
PARTS
PARTS
WARNING CARDS
GANG FILE CARDS
AUGUST 92 STRAYS
SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
TUITION-VIVERITO
TUITION-CONDON/GIBSON
SERVICES
CAMERA CASE
INVOICE AMOUNT
$37.00
$5.77
$1,040.00
$480.00
$129.00
$248.48
$176.25
$68.05
$210.00
$203.52
$124.80
$700.00
$800.00
$96.85
$152.95
***TOTAL**
PAGE 13
TOTAL
*
$235.23*
$1,040.00
$480.00
$377.48
$244.30
$210.00
$203.52
$124.80
$1,500.00
$96.85
$152.95
$14,708.57
$14,434.07 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $274.50
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
DON ANDERSON
SUPPLIES
$19.64
SUPPLIES
$23.05
EXPENSES
$30.44
$73.13
ASEPTIC CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC.
CAVACIDE
$137.45
$137.45
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
RECHARGE 1 EXTINGUISHER
$11.88
CARTRIDGES
$280.50
$292.38
CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC.
SERVICE
$247.13
$247.13
CHICAGO SUN -TIMES, INC.
F F EXAM AD
$814.98
$814.98
HENRY DAWSON
E PENSES
$640.76
$640.76
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
DAY -TIMERS, INC.
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION
FIREHOUSE
FRIES AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
GFE, INC
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
HARRISON SUPPLY COMPANY
DAILY HERALD
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS FOUND.
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
ILLINOIS PAPER CO.
KENT MARSH LTD.
KINNEY SHOE CORPORATION
RAYMOND KORDECKI
KREST UNIFORMS, INC.
LIQUID AIR CORPORATION
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9%30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$83.37
$83.37
INSTALL 6 TIRES
$138.00
$138.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$69.35
$69.35
SUBSCRIPTION
$21.97
$21.97
TOW AMB 524
$55.00
$55.00
AUG 92 CARWASHING
$12.00
$12.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$54.40
$54.40
MTCE SUPPLIES
$434.10
MTCE SUPPLIES
$885.28
MTCE SUPPLIES
$100.62
$1,420.00
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$53.44
$53.44
MTCE & COPIES
174.00
MTCE & COPIES
9117.11
--MTCE &-COPIES
$121.30
12 41
PARTS
$62.34
PARTS
$61.99
$124.33
FIREFIGHTER AD
$370.40
$370.40
LUMBER
$71.25
$71.25
SERVICE
$192.14
SERVICE
$75.08
SERVICE
--$104-35
SERVICE
$21.46
SERVICE
$24.94
$417.97
REGISTER TRUTY
$125.00
REGISTER TRUTY
$125.00
$250.00
BROCHURES
$412.50
HANDBOOKS
$113.15
$525.65
PAPER
$232.50
$232.50
1 COPY OF FOLDERBOLT
$59.00
$59.00
WORKOUT SHOES
$5,164.50
$5 164.50
EXPENSES
$912.00
912.00
100 SHOULDER PATCHES
$145.00
$145.00
CYLINDERS
$20.00
$20.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$136.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$218.80
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$147.24
$502.04
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
MAC SHOPPER
SOFTWARE
$108.45
$108.45
MAC TOOLS
2 PAIR PLIERS
$54.45
$54.45
MAC'S FIRE AND SAFETY, INC.
4 HELMETS
$708.65
$708.65
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
BLACK TONER
$206.77
$206.77
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
REBUILD SIREN
$65.00
REBUILD&REPAIR ALT/REG
$190.00
$255.00
MOTOROLA, INC.
EQUIPMENT
$1,055.00
EQUIPMENT
$1,720.00
$2,775.00
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
PARTS
$82.34
PARTS
$184.72
PARTS
$40.41
PARTS
$18.51
PARTS
$30.90
PARTS
$12.29
PARTS
$29.70
PARTS
$54.28
PARTS
$169.90
PARTS
$24.00
PARTS
$61.06
$708.11
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
SEMINAR-PEYTON
$98.00
$98.00
NCCEM HEADQUARTERS
MEMBERSHIP THILL
$75.00
$75.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
IN STATION TRAINING
$330.00
$330.00
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER
MICE SUPPLIES
$110.52
MICE SUPPLIES
$23.88
$134.40
ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$24.54
SUPPLIES
$83.61
$108.15
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
SUPPLIES/TRAINING/MEETING
$77.35
SUPPLIES/TRAINING/MEETING
$9.95
SUPPLIES/TRAINING/MEETING
$2.19
SUPPLIES/TRAINING/MEETING
$9.00
SUPPLIES/TRAINING/MEETING
$6.39
SUPPLIES/TRAINING/MEETING
$8.27
$113.15*
PHYSIO -CONTROL
SERVICE
$825.00
$825.00
PROSPECT DIVE SHOP
REPAIRS & SUPPLIES
$125.00
REPAIRS & SUPPLIES
$112.95
SUPPLIES
$23.00
$260.95
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
OCT 92 MEMBER ASSESSMENT
$29,484.50
$29,484.50 $29,484.50
***TOTAL** $29,484.50
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
R & R UNIFORMS INC.
CLOTHING
$91.90
CLOTHING
$213.15
CLOTHING
$42.50
CLOTHING
$41.00
CLOTHING
$62.00
CLOTHING
$65.75
CLOTHING
$121.25
$637.55
SAVANT WELDING SUPPLY, INC.
OXYGEN CYLINDER
$70.96
$70.96
SCHMERLER FORD INC.
WATER PUMP REPL
$100.00
$100.00
SULLIVAN PRESS
INSPECTION FORMS/ENVELOPES
$246.00
$246.00
TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DIST. 214
SCHOOL RENTAL CHARGES
$126.00
$126.00
WALGREENS
BATTERIES$89.00
$89.00
WOLF CAMERA AND VIDEO
CAMERA
75.95
$75.95
2ATECH INC.
RADIO
$495.00
$495.00
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
***TOTAL**
$21,921.95
GENERAL FUND
$17,943.50 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
$3,978.45
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
OCT 92 MEMBER ASSESSMENT
$29,484.50
$29,484.50 $29,484.50
***TOTAL** $29,484.50
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
JANET ABERNETHY
ADVANTAGE VENDING SERVICES
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
CHRIS BAIER
LEONARD W. BAZAN
CASE MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CHICAGO HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORP
COMMUNITY CAB CO.
CULTURAL IMPACT CONFERENCE
JUDY FELL
.ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS COMMUNITY EDUC. ASSN.
LISA LEVIN
RAY LUNDIN
LINDA MARKAY
MEDICAL DISPOSAL SERVICES, INC
MITY-LITE
NATIONAL ASSN. OF SOCIAL WORKE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OTTO SCHERR
SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CO.
SHELTER, INC.
JEANNE SHERMAN
SPRINGHOUSE DIRECT
BERTHA STEIL
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT
KATHI WESLEY
HELEN WHITLOCK
VIRGINIA ZITO
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9130192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CAMERA/BATTERIESrFILM
$194.18
$194.18
POP MACHINE SEWCE CALL
$50.00
$50.00
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$842.65
$842.65
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$30.00
$30.00
MASSAGE TABLE RENTAL
$75.00
$75.00
HEALTH FAIR ROLLS
$158.76
$158.76
HEALTH FAIR SUPPLIES
$142.16
$142.16
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$448.40
$448.40
REGISTER-PERSINO
$100.00
$100.00*
EXPENSES
$154.45
EXPENSES
$18.65
$173.10
SERVICE
$37.31
$37.31
MEMBERSHIP
$40.00
$40.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$3.00
$3.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$3.00
$3.00
SUPPLIES
$47.63
SUPPLIES
$3.40
$51.03
TABLES
$1,803.20
$1,803.20
MEMBERSHIP -MORGAN
$170.00
$170.00
EXPENSES
$14.01
EXPENSES
$17.75
EXPENSES
$5.36
$$6.00*
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
$47.49
$47.49
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,125.00
$1,125.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
VSS BREATH SOUNDS
$27.70
$27.70
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$15.00
$15.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
AUGUST DRIVER REIMB
$21.00
$21.00
***TOTAL**
$5,658.10
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30%92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$5,658.10
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPRAISAL SYSTEMS
APPRAISAL SERVICES
$1,800.00
$1,800.00
CHICAGO CHAPTER, AMERICAN
REGISTER SIMS
$125.00
$125.00
CRAIN'S CHICAGO BUSINESS
SUBSCRIPTION
$68.00
$68.00
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO
BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM
$2,300.00
BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM
$2,300.00
$4,600.00
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SERVICES RENDERED
$210.00
$210.00
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL FOR CHAS
$34.28
$34.28
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$4.00
$4.00-
R THREE PROSPECT AND M.A.J.
CDBG 2000-2006 E ALGONQUIN
$15,872.00
$15,872.00
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,333.33
$1,333.33
V & G PRINTERS INC.
BUSINESS CARDS-CLEMENTS
$39.00
$39.00
WILKIN INSULATION COMPANY
CDBG-10 N ELM STREET
$455.00
$455.00
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$24,540.61
GENERAL FUND
$1,907.00 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$22,633.61
STREET DIVISION
A. P.W.A.tCHICAGO CHAPTER
REGISTER ASPEN/UDELHOFEN
$30.00
$30.00
ADDISON BBUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
$17.09
SUPPLIES
$.71
SUPPLIES
$65.27
SUPPLIES
$7.20
SUPPLIES
$47.27
SUPPLIES
$25.41
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
ANTIOCH TIRE, INC.
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY
BILL'S LAWN & POWER
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
BUSSE HARDWARE
C A CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
CADE INDUSTRIES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9130192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PARTS
MATERIALS
MATERIALS
MATERIALS
CLEANING SUPPLIES
SEPTEMBER MICE
FOLDING STOP SIGN LOCKS
TIRE SERVICE
BITTERSWEET LANE RECON
RESURFACING PROGRAM
SUPPLIES
MICE SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
MTCE SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
S/C SIDEWALK PROGRAM
SUUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$38.54
$5.56
$11.45
$133.00
$43.03
$882.90
$39.00
$1,656.00
$359.26
$147.00
$364.23
$98.83
$113,058.45
$25,671.90
$63.94
$32.13
$77.19
$25.08
$119.20
$200.00
$108.20
$395.65
$641.00
$2.19
$3.29
$26.00
$5.19
$87.19
$9.25
$10.57
$3,063.01
$116.00
$359.00
$237.92
$237.92
$237.92
PAGE 19
TOTAL
$218.50
$133.00
$43.03
$2,577.90
$359.26
$147.00
$364.23
$98.83
$138,730.35
$63.94
$32.13
$529.67
$1,036.65
$143.68
$3,063.01
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
SUPPLIES
$237.92
SUPPLIES
$237.91
SUPPLIES
$237.91
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$280.50
$2,183.00
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
AUGUST SERVICE
$126.50
$126.50
CENTER FOR NEIGHBORHOOD TECHN.
REGISTER-ANGELL
$95.00
$95.00*
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$421.20
SUPPLIES
$45.40
$466.60
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
WATER USAGE CHARGE
$71.97
$71.97
CITRON CHEMICAL, INC.
SUPPLIES
$304.36
SUPPLIES
$386.75
$691.11
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
CREDIT
$43.60 -
PAINT
$73.80
$30.20
COMMONWEALTH-EDISON
SERVICE
$12.,.170.27
$12,17.0.27
COMP USA
1 SNAP SHELL HOUSING CASE
$156.97
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$2,366.48
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$467.34
CREDIT
$345.24 -
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$280.00
SUPPLIES
$44.99
$2,970.54
CONRAD AND SON
MTCE-SUPPLIES
$115.94
$115.94
DOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
SERVICE DOORS
$106.03
$106.03
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
SUPPLIES
$20.90
SUPPLIES
$31.88
CREDIT
$20.90-
$31.88
DUPAGE.TOPSOIL INC.
TOPSOIL
$140.00
TOPSOIL
$140.00
TOPSOIL
$140.00
TOPSOIL
$140.00
TOPSOIL
$140.00
$700.00
E AND E HAULING INC.
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$339.15
$339.15
FINISHMASTER, INC.
PAINT SUPPLIES
$36.95
PAINT SUPPLIES
$158.38
PAINT SUPPLIES
$56.29
$251.62
FIRE AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC
ALARM SERVICES
$99.00
$99.00
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
AUG 92 CARWASHING
$20.00
$20.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICE
$164.20
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.69
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.70
$467.59
GATEWAY SUPPLY CO.
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
$46.99
$46.99
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
PAINT
$72.00
PAINT
$73.90
$145.90
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
$1,232.00
SERVICES RENDEED999
$
$1,.73
HEARTH & HOME INC.
UMBRELLA SUPPLI767
ES
$82.50
$82.73
$82 $82.50
HEIGHTS CERTIFIED PLUMBING, IN
REPL ELECTRIC VALVE MOTOR
$281.84
$281.84
HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC.
CATALYTIC CONVERTER
$423.13
CREDIT
$20.00-
$403.13
ITEC
1 HYDRAULIC THROTTLE
$136.38
$136.38
NELS J. JOHNSON
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$2,100.00
$2,100.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
DUMPING CHARGES
$924.00
$924.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$14.62
PARTS
$60.23
PARTS
$2.06
$76.91
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$29.04
PARTS
$19.56
PARTS
$35.04
PARTS
$8.38
PARTS
$226.34
PARTS
$35.04
$22.81
$.21
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
MTCES376SUPPLIES
$39..58
$ $3939
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$9.4455
SUPPLIES
$66.91
SUPPLIES
$24.69
SUPPLIES
42.50
SUPPLIES
32.59
$176.14
LINOX
STARGON
$140.58
$140.58
MCGINTY BROS., INC.
SPRAY PKWY TREES FOR ANTS
$130.00
$130.00
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
COPIER MTCE AGREEMENT
$400.00
BLACK STARTER
$87.10
EP490Z COPIER DRUM
$345.00
$832.10
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
MTCE SUPPLIES
$135.00
$135.00
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
BOOKLET
$3.00
$3.00
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SER
QTR ALARM SVC CHG
$25.00
$25.00
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
SERVICES RENDERED
$596.20
SERVICE COMPRESSOR
$217.00
$813.20
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1830 E KENSINGTON
$99.64
$99.64
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
TRAINING TAPES
$137.50
$137.5§
NORTHWEST SUB. FURN. SERV. CO.
DESK REPAIRS
$300.00
$300.00
P & W INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.
MICE SUPPLIES
$143.79
$143.79
PATTEN POWER SYSTEMS
MICE SUPPLIES
$68.80
$68.8.,
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$6.09
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$6.02
TRAVEL--& SUPPLIES-
$6.0
TRAVEL-&--SUPPLIES
$4.30
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$104.42
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$20.23
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$22.26
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
X53.99
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$26.44
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.60
$201.35*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$113.95
$113.95
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$80.05
PARTS
$129.00
PARTS
$129.00
PARTS
$4.40
PARTS
$7.95
$350.40
ROADWORKS, INC.
CURB & GUTTER PROGRAM
$24,167.38
$24,167.38
RUEFFER STAMP WORKS
ROUTING STAMP
$20.61
$20.61
SAM'S GLASS & TRIM, INC
REPLACE W/S GLASS 4510
$139.32
REPLACE WjS GLASS 4537
$178.96
$318.28
SAUBER MFG. CO.
MTCE SUPPLLIES
$22.78
$22.78
SCHWEPPE & SONS
4 INSULATED SERVERS
$55.00
$55.00
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
SEPT 92 PEST CONTROL
$40.00
SEPT 92 PEST CONTROL
$40.00
SEPT 92 PEST CONTROL
$40.00
SEPT 92 PEST CONTROL
$40.00
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ABM, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$380.00
PAGE 23
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$4.66
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
$11.39
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
SUPPLIES
$4.13
SEPT 92 PEST CONTROL
$40.00
$122.50
$177.08
SEPT 92 PEST CONTROL
$40.00
$240.00
SHIGO AND TREES, ASSOCIATES
BOOKLET
$3.00
$3.00
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
ANTISCALE TABLETS
$35.12
$35.12
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
SUPPLIES
$9.26
$47.95
$47.95
SUPPLIES
$19.78
$29.04
SUPERIOR SPRINKLER SYSTEM
SERVICE CALL
$381.88
SERVICE CALL
$87.50
$469.38
TECH SYN CORPORATION
HYDRAULIC HOSE
$237.12
$237.12
EDWARD TEED
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
MTCE SUPPLIES
$1.95
$1.95
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
WINDOW CLEANING
$180.00
WINDOW CLEANING
$180.00
WINDOW CLEANING
$180.00
$540.00
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$204,980.86
GENERAL FUND
$27,807.33 MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND
$177,067.50
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$106.03
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ABM, INC.
PAPER SHREDDER
$380.00
$380.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
$4.66
SUPPLIES
$11.39
SUPPLIES
$34.40
SUPPLIES
$4.13
SUPPLIES
$122.50
$177.08
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$11.43
PARTS
$76.02
CREDIT
$76.60-
$10.85
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN.
PUBLICATIONS
$47.95
$47.95
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ARMOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION
B & H INDUSTRIES
BADGER METER INC
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
CADE INDUSTRIES
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
COMARK, INC.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMP USA
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
DOALL NORTHERN ILLINOIS
EATON FINANCIAL CORP
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FINISHMASTER, INC.
FLUID CONSERVATION SYSTEMS COR
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
G & K SERVICES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
COLLECTION FEES
$38.96
$38.96
APPLIQUE
$8.95
$8.95
MTCE SUPPLIES
$545.89
MICE SUPPLIES
$50.90
MICE SUPPLIES
$26.50
MTCE SUPPLIES
$55.70
MTCE SUPPLIES
$111.40
METERS
$560.00
$1,350.39
PARTS
$31.63
PARTS
$119.20
PARTS
$200.00
$350.83
COPIER PAPER
$1,206.00
$1,206.00
SUPPLIES
$168.00
- CLEANING-SUPPLI-ES -
$723-00
SUPPLIES
$312.76
SUPPLIES
$82.00
$394.76
MTCE AGREEMENT
$120.00
$120.00
BJ80-JT-23598
$2,858.74
$2,858.74
BH67-JT-1310-A
$160.63
$160.63
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$467.35
SUPPLIES
$46.98
CREDIT
$345.24 -
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$279.99
SUPPLIES545.00
$494.08
VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA
$104,946.00
POWER COSTS-JAWA
$10,792.00
OPER/MAINT COSTS-JAWA
$15,583.00
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
$131,998.00
$263,319.00*
SAW BLADES
$277.86
$277.86
5400 COPIER LEASE 9/92
$506.23
$506.23
DELIVERY
$58.75
$58.75
PAINT SUPPLIES
$158.38
$158.38
EQUIPMENT MTCE CONTRACT
$1,920.00
$1,920.00
EXTINGUISHER SERVICE
$20.00
$20.00
AUG 92 CARWASHING
$43.90
$43.90
UNIFORM SERVICE
$164.19
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 25
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.70
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.69
$467.58
MARIO GAMBINO LANDSCAPING INC
PARKWAY RESTORATION
$1,616.00
$1,616.00
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
$2,022.15
WATER METER LABOR
$380.64
WATER METER LABOR
$356.85
$2,759.64
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$89.28
SERVICE
$31.06
SERVICE
$203.83
SERVICE
$533.12
SERVICE
$37.55
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$61.25
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$97.32
SERVICE
$18.16
SERVICE
$17.01
SERVICE
$24.57
SERVICE
$17.11
SERVICE
$54.34
SERVICE
$17.52
$1,294.01
INMAC
SUPPLIES
$89.77
$89.77
JULIE, INC.
SERVICE
$161.02
SERVICE
$2.91
$163.93
LAKE -COOK LAND SURVEY
SERVICES RENDERED
$150.00
$150.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$924.00
$924.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$45.18
PARTS
$401.25
PARTS
$68.44
$514.87
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$23.36
PARTS
$98.25
PARTS
$56.10
PARTS
$50.46
$228.17
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$44.80
SUPPLIES
$26.45
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
SUPPLIES
$23.75
SUPPLIES
$27.75
$122.75
MCMASTER-CARR
MTCE SUPPLIES
$16.17
$16.17
MERCURY PNEUMATIC COMPANY
MICE SUPPLIES
$106.33
$106.33
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
COPIER MICE AGREEMENT
$400.00
$400.00
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
MICE SUPPLIES
$25.90
$25.90
MUNICIPAL MARKING DISTRIBUTORS
BLUE MARKING PAINT
$71.74
$71.74
NATIONAL ELECTRIC CABLE
SUPPLIES
$259.96
$259.96
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
FRAME & SOLID LID
$1,452.00
$1,452.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
112 E HIGHLAND/EMERSON
$.97
$.97
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
TRAINING TAPES
$137,50
$137.50
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$21.10
$41.10
PATTEN POWER SYSTEMS
MICE SUPPLIES
$27.14
$27.14
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$.98
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$65.53
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$96.66
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
8.68
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$ 9.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$25.54
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$40.93
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$32.72
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$5.80
$307.84*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$56.50
PARTS
$113.95
$170.45
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$833.97
WATER BILLS POSTAGE
$773.65
$1,607.62*
PROSAFETY
STORAGE CABINET
$640.00
$640.00
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$41.11
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$$41.11
$224.17
4.17
PARTS
$129.00
PARTS
$45.58
$222.92
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
FILM & PROCESSING
$27.36
FILM & PROCESSING
$13.30
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 27
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9130192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
FILM & PROCESSING
$17.07
FILM & PROCESSING
$6.19
FILM & PROCESSING
$50.73
$114.65
RELATIONAL COURSEWARE, INC.
SOFTWARE LEASE
$1,670.00
$1,670.00
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
VALVE ASBLY
$1,219.47
$1,219.47
ROBACK'S TRUCK & AUTO, INC.
PAINT
$950.00
$950.00
ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO.
SUPPLIES
$93.26
$93.26
SERVALL ENGINEERING CO.
WHEELER
$694.75
$694.75
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
MTCE SUPPLIES
$2,303.20
$2,303.20
SOUTHERN ILL. UNIV. AT EDWARD.
SELF STUDY COURSE-DORSEY
$50.00
$50.00
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
SUPPLIES
$17.40
$17.40
TECH SYN CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$378.00
$378.00
TEMCO MACHINERY, INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$70.88
$70.88
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
MICE SUPPLIES
$33.58
MICE SUPPLIES
$53.03
MTCE SUPPLIES
$25.83
$112.44
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
COPY PAPER
$30.58
$30.58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ARMOR COLLECTIONS FEES
$38.84
WATER PRO SUPPLIES INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$202.32
HYDRANTS
$3,358.00
$3,560.32
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
MTCE SUPPLIES
$298.65
PARTS
$74.80
PARTS
$153.58
CREDIT
$6.50-
MTCE SUPPLIES
$2.01
MTCE SUPPLIES
$5.25
$527.79
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
10 CAST -COUPLING
$217.58
$217.58
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$300,702.97
WATER & SEWER FUND
$300,702.97
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY AUGUST
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$30,600.66
PAGE 28
AUGUST
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$114,421.23
AUGUST
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
$48,654.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
& SUPPLIES
$24.65
$24.65*
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C
AUGUST LAND LEASE
$1,274.47
$1,274.47
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH66-JT-0498-A
$20.49
BH66-JT-3710-A
$4.82
BH66-JT-5262-A
$201.85
BH66-JT-5266-C
$183.12
BH68-JT-7498-A
$20.49
$430.77
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
$11.00
$11.00
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
WINDOW CLEANING
$180.00
$180.00
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,896.24
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,896.24
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY AUGUST
COLLECTION
$30,600.66
AUGUST
COLLECTION
$114,421.23
AUGUST
COLLECTION
$48,654.00
AUGUST
COLLECTION
$27,169.79
$220,845.68*
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL
& SUPPLIES
$24.65
$24.65*
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$220,870.33
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $220,870.33
**#**#************#*********#***#*****#************************#**********************#***********#****#
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC. INSTALL FIRE ALARM $1,410.00 $1,410.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 29
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9130192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC.
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$230.00
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$230.00
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$200.00
$660.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
$13.05
$13.05
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$24.23
PARTS
$48.46
$72.69
BUHRKE INDUSTRIES INC.
SUPPLIES
$242.50
SUPPLIES
$242.50
$485.00
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH66-JT-5388-C
$273.02
$273.02
RON DASCHER
REIMB DRIVEWAY SEALING
$203.75
$203.75
THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P.
OCTOBER RENT
$2,600.00
A. J. MAGGIO CO.
SERVICES RENDERED
61,513.00
$261,513.00
$261,$25.00
MCMASTER-CARR
STEP KEY STOCK
$25.53
$25.53
METZ CEMENT CONSTRUCTION CO.
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,243.00
$1,243.00
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI
MUSEUM RESTORATION EXPENSE
$5,001.54
$5,001.54
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
4 SUPERPRINT 400 TDD'S
$510.00
$510.00
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
FITTINGS
$144.81
$144.81
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$3,595.32
$3,595.32
SEC DONOHUE INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$21,547.18
$21,547.18
R.G. SMITH EQUIPMENT CO.
CAB SHIELD
$250.00
$.00
BARRY A. SPRINGER
AUGUST LEGAL SERVICES
$67.50
$67
$67.50
TECH SYN CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$7.47
SUPPLIES
$7.48
SUPPLIES
$3.60
SUPPLIES
$3.60
SUPPLIES
$9.87
SUPPLIES
$9.88
SUPPLIES
$43.40
SUPPLIES
$43.40
SUPPLIES
$69.24
SUPPLIES
$69.24
SUPPLIES
$4.77
SUPPLIES
$4.78
$276.73
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
108 N NORTHWEST HWY
$19.53
$19.53
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$299,911.65
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 30
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $1,254.76 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $8,470.14
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $264,773.00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $67.50
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $25,142.50 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992 $203.75
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH67-JT-3858-B
$29.68
$29.68
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI
BUDGET ALLOCATION
$2,875.00
$2,875.00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$18.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$36.00
$54.00*
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
WINDOW CLEANING
$171.00
$171.00
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$3,129.68
GENERAL FUND
$3,129.68
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $2,055,056.79
DATE RUN 9/30/92
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 31
TIME RUN 11.27.08
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 9/30/92
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$585,488.19
21
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$223,776.75
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$178,430.85
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$24,287.64
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$13,034.53
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$401,948.95
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$5,383.85
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$1,254.76
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$151,219.37
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$65,981.66
53
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$264,773.00
56
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$67.50
58
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
$25,142.50
59
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992
$203.75
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$41,471.80
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$47,117.53
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$25,474.16
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $2,055,056.79
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, it is estimated that ten percent of the population is
affected by learning disabilities; and
WHEREAS, people with learning disabilities exhibit average or
above-average intelligence, but, because of neurological
differences experience difficulties when trying to learn and/or
perform in regular instructional settings and/or social
situations; and
WHEREAS, with early diagnosis, an appropriate educational
program, and support from parents and the community, individuals
with learning disabilities can be successful; and
WHEREAS, the Council On Understanding Learning Disabilities
(C.O.U.L.D.) Association of Illinois and the Learning
Disabilities Association of America is a volunteer, non-profit
organization which offers support and information to parents and
professionals who deal with learning disabilities; and
WHEREAS, C.O.U.L.D. supports the following goals of the national
organization:
Encourage research in neuro -physiological and psychological
aspects of learning disabilities;
Stimulate development of early detection programs;
Create a climate of public awareness and acceptance;
Disseminate information widely;
Develop and promote legislative assistance;
Improve regular and special education; and
Establish career opportunities.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim October, 1992, as LEARNING
DISABILITIES MONTH in the Village of Mount Prospect. I urge all
Mount Prospect citizens to assist children and adults with
learning disabilities and to recognize the efforts of the
Council On Understanding Learning Disabilities during this month
of observance.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 6th day of. October, 1992.
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
UNITED WAY FUND DRIVE
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect/Prospect Heights United Way is
conducting its 1992/93 fund raising campaign for deserving
agencies serving the Village of Mount Prospect and surrounding
areas; and
WHEREAS, many charitable organizations within the Village of
Mount Prospect depend upon the financial aid of the United Way
it
in order to continue their many fine activities; and
WHEREAS, this one drive is designed to consolidate as much as
possible the many individual appeals for operating funds for
this coming year; and
WHEREAS, the residents, business and professional community,
as well as the Village of Mount Prospect, endorse the Mount
Prospect/Prospect Heights United Way fund as the most feasible
method of raising funds to aid in the support of the many
agencies which benefit from the United Way.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the support of the Village
in the Mount Prospect/Prospect Heights United Way fund drive
and do encourage the residents and businesses within the
Village to support this worthwhile cause.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
�Village Clerk
Dated this 6th day of October, 1992.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
decreasing the number of Class 'R" liquor licenses by one (1) (House of Szchewan, Ten
North Main Street) so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter
13 shall be and read as follows:
Section 13 r of Licenses
Two (2)
Class A Licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Ten (10)
Class C Licenses
One (1)
Class D License
Two (2)
Class E Licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H License
One (1)
Class M License
One (1)
Class P License
Twenty (20)
Class R Licenses
Nine (9)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T License
Seven (7)
Class W Licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of
Village President
1992.
Class
Esta lishment
Number
A
Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
2
B
Dumas Walker's; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano, Liquors;
Dominick's (83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors;
Jay Liquors; Mt. Prospect Liquors;
Osco Drugs; Phar-Mor; Walgreens (83 and Golf);
Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
1
M
Holiday Inn
1
P
Shimada Shoten
I
R
Artemis; Boo III; DJB Brunetti; Chungkiwa Restaurant;
Dragon City; Edwardo's; Fellini; Giordano's
(Rand Road); Giordano's (Elmhurst Road);
Little America; Magic Dragon; Nina Restaurant; Pepe's;
Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise; Tedino's; Torishin;
Yasuke
20
S
El Sombrero; Emerson House; Jake's Pizza; Jameson's
Charhouse; Kampai; Old Orchard Country Club
Restaurant; Retro Bistro; Sam's Place;
Wild Stallions Cafe
9
T
Thunderbird Lanes
1
W
Anna's Polish Restaurant; Mr. Beef & Pizza;
Pete's Sandwich Mace; Photo's Hot Dogs;
Pizza Hut; Rosati's Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta
7
58
BH/caf
10/2/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING)
OE Tgg VILLAGE CODE OF MOU
NT PRS CT
WHEREAS, the Petitioner (Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect) have filed an application for certain text amendments to
Chapter 14 (Zoning) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect in order
to establish a Special Use category for non-residential uses in
residential zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks amendments to the following Sections
of the Village Code:
Section
14.1001
R -X
District
Section
14.1101
R-1
District
Section
14.1201
R -A
District
Section
14.1301
R-2
District
Section
14.1401
R-3
District
Section
14.1501
R-4
District
WHEREAS, public hearings were held on the proposed amendments,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 42-A-92, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals on June 25, July 23, and August 13, 1992, pursuant to
due and proper legal notice having been published in the Mount
Prospect Herald on the 9th day of June, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given consideration to the requests being the
subject of ZBA 42-A-92.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Section 14.1001 entitled "R -X District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
deleting therefrom paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 and renumber the remaining
paragraphs in proper numeric sequence.
SECTION THREE: That Section 14.1001 entitled "R -X District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning) , as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto paragraph D; so that hereinafter said Section
14.1001.D shall be and read as follows:
11 D. Uses Permitted in Limited Circumstances.
The following uses shall be permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school
without dormitory accommodations and having a curriculum
equivalent to a public elementary or high school;
2. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of
worship;
3. Municipal buildings, parks, libraries or museum buildings
provided no commercial enterprises are conducted on the
premises;
Except that a Special Use permit shall be required if the
following circumstances apply:
I
Chapter 14
Page 2 of 5
1. A residential dwelling unit is being converted for one for one
of the uses set forth in 1, 2 or 3 above as the principal use
of the structure; or
2. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property
not then in use pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 above on a
lot of less than 40,000 square feet. 11
SECTION FOUR: That Section 14.1101 entitled IIR-1 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning) , as amended, is hereby further amended by
deleting therefrom paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 and renumber the remaining
paragraphs in proper numeric sequence.
SECTION FIVE: That Section 14.1101 entitled IIR-1 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto paragraph D; so that hereinafter said Section
14.1101.D shall be and read as follows:
I'D. Uses Permitted in Limited Circumstances.
The following uses shall be permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school
without dormitory accommodations and having a curriculum
equivalent aid a public elementary or high school;
2. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of
worship;
3. Municipal buildings, parks, libraries or museum buildings
provided no commercial enterprises are conducted on the
premises;
Except that a Special Use permit shall be required if the
following circumstances apply:
1. A residential dwelling unit is being converted for one for one
of the uses set forth in 1, 2 or 3 above as the principal use
of the structure; or
2. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property
not then in use pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 above on a
lot of less than 40,000 square feet. 11
SECTION SIX: That Section 14.1201 entitled "R -A District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning) , as amended, is hereby further amended by
deleting therefrom paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 and renumber the remaining
paragraphs in proper numeric sequence.
SECTION SEVEN: That Section 14.1201 entitled "R -A District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning) , as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto paragraph E; so that hereinafter said section
14.1201.E shall be and read as follows:
IIE. Uses Permitted in Limited Circumstances.
The following uses shall be permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school
without dormitory accommodations and having a curriculum
equivalent aid a public elementary or highschool;
2. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of
worship;
Chapter 14
Page 3 of 5
3. Municipal buildings, parks, libraries or museum buildings
provided no commercial enterprises are conducted on the
premises;
Except that a Special Use permit shall be required if the
following circumstances apply:
1. A residential dwelling unit is being converted for one for one
of the uses set forth in 1, 2 or 3 above as the principal use
of the structure; or
2. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property
not then in use pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 above on a
lot of less than 40,000 square feet. 11
SECTION EIGHT: That section 14.1301 entitled IIR-2 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
deleting therefrom paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and renumber the remaining
paragraphs in proper numeric sequence.
SECTION NINE: That Section 14.1301 entitled "R-2 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto paragraph D; so that hereinafter said Section
14.1301.D shall be and read as follows:
I'D. Uses Permitted in Limited Circumstances.
The following uses shall be permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school
without dormitory accommodations and having a curriculum
equivalent aid a public elementary or high school;
2. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of
worship;
3. Municipal buildings, parks, libraries or museum buildings
provided no commercial enterprises are conducted on the
premises;
Except that a Special Use permit shall be required if the
following circumstances apply:
1. A residential dwelling unit is being converted for one for one
of the uses set forth in 1, 2 or 3 above as the principal use
of the structure; or
2. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property
not then in use pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 above on a
lot of less than 40,000 square feet. 11
SECTION TEN: That Section 14.1401 entitled IIR-3 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning) , as amended, is hereby further amended by
deleting therefrom paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 and renumber the remaining
paragraphs in proper numeric sequence.
SECTION BLEYEH: That Section 14.1401 entitled IIR-3 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto paragraph D; so that hereinafter said Section
14.1401.D shall be and read as follows:
Chapter 14
Page 4 of 5
I'D. Uses Permitted in Limited Circumstances.
The following uses shall be permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school
without dormitory accommodations and having a curriculum
equivalent aid a public elementary or high school;
2. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of
worship;
3. Municipal buildings, parks, libraries or museum buildings
provided no commercial enterprises are conducted on the
premises;
Except that a Special Use permit shall be required if the
following circumstances apply:
1. A residential dwelling unit is being converted for one for one
of the uses set forth in 1, 2 or 3 above as the principal use
of the structure; or
2. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property
not then in use pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 above on a
lot of less than 40r000 square feet, 11
SECTION TWELVE: That Section 14.1501 entitled "R-3 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning) , as amended, is hereby further amended by
deleting therefrom paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 and renumber the remaining
paragraphs in proper numeric sequence.
SECTION THIRTEEN: That Section 14.1501 entitled IIR-2 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto paragraph D; so that hereinafter said Section
14.1501.D shall be and read as follows:
I'D. Uses Permitted in Limited Circumstances.
The following uses shall be permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school
without dormitory accommodations and having a curriculum
equivalent aid a public elementary or high school;
2. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of
worship;
3. Municipal buildings, parks, libraries or museum buildings
provided no commercial enterprises are conducted on the
premises;
Except that a Special Use permit shall be required if the
following circumstances apply:
1. A residential dwelling unit is being converted for one for one
of the uses set forth in 1, 2 or 3 above as the principal use
of the structure; or
2. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property
not then in use pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 above on a
lot of less than 40,000 square feet. 11
SECTION FOURTEEN: That section 14.1501 entitled IIR-3 District" of
Chapter 14
Page 5 of 5
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
deleting therefrom paragraphs 4, 5 and 6 and renumber the remaining
paragraphs in proper numeric sequence.
SECTION FIFTEE : That Section 14.1501 entitled IIR-2 District" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning), as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto paragraph D; so that hereinafter said Section
14.1401.D shall be and read as follows:
I'D. Uses Permitted in Limited Circumstances.
The following uses shall be permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school
without dormitory accommodations and having a curriculum
equivalent aid a public elementary or high school;
2. Churches, synagogues, mosques and other houses of
worship;
3. Municipal buildings, parks, libraries or museum buildings
provided no commercial enterprises are conducted on the
premises;
A Special Use permit shall be required if the following
circumstances apply:
1. A residential dwelling unit is being converted for one for one
of the uses set forth in 1, 2 or 3 above as the principal use
of the structure; or
2. A new building or structure is to be constructed on property
not then in use pursuant to paragraphs 1, 2 or 3 above on a
lot of less than 40,000 square feet. 11
SECTION SIXTEEN: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
. 1992.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by Jameson's Charhouse. The applicant is requesting a variance
to Section 14.3003 to reduce the existing non -conforming parking by one space, and to
eliminate the required loading facility for a restaurant in order to construct an enclosed
refuse area.
Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their regular meeting of August 27,
1992. At the meeting, Attorney Anthony Lello, representing the petitioner, indicated that
the owners wished to complete an enclosed refuse area in order to screen the garbage
dumpsters. The enclosure is located in the designated loading area. He indicated that the
structure was well built and matched the existing building. Mr. Lello indicated that deliveries
were made four to five times a week and were usually finished before 11:00 a.m. He stated
that deliveries could be made from a standing loading area at the rear of the building, and
would not conflict with customer parking.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the site was developed in 1986 as part of the Algonquin
Shopping Center. The site plan also required a 12' x 35' loading area. Mr. Forsythe went
on to say that staff could support this variation request with the condition that a standing
loading area be striped so that confusion to customers and delivery vehicles would be
reduced.
The Zoning Board members discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends the approval of the variance to allow the reduction of one parking
space and the loading area with a condition that a striping plan be developed.
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONISVILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT:
ZBA-51-V-92, JAMESON'S CHARHOUSE
LOCATION:
1702 ALGONQUIN ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by Jameson's Charhouse. The applicant is requesting a variance
to Section 14.3003 to reduce the existing non -conforming parking by one space, and to
eliminate the required loading facility for a restaurant in order to construct an enclosed
refuse area.
Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their regular meeting of August 27,
1992. At the meeting, Attorney Anthony Lello, representing the petitioner, indicated that
the owners wished to complete an enclosed refuse area in order to screen the garbage
dumpsters. The enclosure is located in the designated loading area. He indicated that the
structure was well built and matched the existing building. Mr. Lello indicated that deliveries
were made four to five times a week and were usually finished before 11:00 a.m. He stated
that deliveries could be made from a standing loading area at the rear of the building, and
would not conflict with customer parking.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the site was developed in 1986 as part of the Algonquin
Shopping Center. The site plan also required a 12' x 35' loading area. Mr. Forsythe went
on to say that staff could support this variation request with the condition that a standing
loading area be striped so that confusion to customers and delivery vehicles would be
reduced.
The Zoning Board members discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends the approval of the variance to allow the reduction of one parking
space and the loading area with a condition that a striping plan be developed.
IL
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 51-V-92
Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER:
Jameson's Charhouse
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1702 Algonquin Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 11, 1992
REQUEST:
A variation from Section 143003 to reduce non-
conforming parking by one space, and to
eliminate the required loading facility for a
restaurant in order to construct an enclosed
refuse area.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/IN'T'ERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced agenda item ZBA-51-V-92 as being a request by Jameson's
Charhouse, 1702 Algonquin Road to reduce non -conforming parking by one space, and to
eliminate the required loading facility for a restaurant in order to construct an enclosed
refuse area.
Mr. Anthony Lello introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals as the attorney
representing Jameson's Charhouse. The attorney noted that this request involves the
reduction of one existing parking space at the restaurant. He explained that this space had
always been used as a dumpster location and a place for an outside grease trap, and in
effect the number of usable parking spaces at the restaurant was not changing. He stated
that the brick refuse enclosure was being constructed in the area of the loading dock in
order to provide more attractive screening for the dumpster areas and for the restaurant to
better utilize this space. He stated that the restaurant receives deliveries four to five times
a week. He stated that deliveries usually occur before 9:00 a.m, and that definitely all
deliveries are concluded before 11:00 a.m., the beginning of the lunch time trade. He stated
that all the deliveries are by two -axle trucks, and that these trucks can park in an existing
maneuvering aisle, and unload with access through a rear door. He stated that there. are
no long semi -trucks involved with the deliveries, except a once -a -week beer truck and that
1 J
ZBA-51-V-92
Page 2
this delivery occurs during non-peak penods He stated that the loss of the one space and
the loss of the loading area woWd not impact operations and would not adversely affect
parking. He also stated the brick enclosure matches the building.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff request for the Zoning Board of Appeals and
acknowledged that this is a reduction of one parking space on-site along with the. required
loading dock. Mr. Forsythe stated that the restaurant was developed in 1986 as part of the
Algonquin Shopping Center and ,14t that tune 116 parking spaces were required_ and 138
spaces were provided on-site. The current parking requirements would be for a total of 150
spaces so the 'restaurant has a Ii n-conforming number of parking spaces. Mr. Forsythe
explained that she believed the petitioner had done a good job in explaining deliveries to the
restaurant, which helped demons ate that the loss of the loading space would not impact
operations nor parking on-site He stated that: staff would recommend approval of the
request, subject to striping of the, area to be',"/used as a standing loading area behind the
restaurant.
Mr. Basnik asked if the petitionewould be vlling to stripe the area as requested by staff,
and Mr. Lello stated that this Ivo ld be proprly,striped.
Mrs. Skowron noted that the dumpster encl 'sure had been partially completed, and the
attorney explained that his client lad hired a contractor to do the work with the assumption
that all necessary permits would b"e obtained ' Unfortunately, this had not been done.
Mr. Pratt questioned the actual location wherd, tricks load and enter, the restaurant, and the
attorney explained that access is by a rear door.
There being no further discussion Chatrman'Basnik asked for a motion on the request.
Mr. Saviano moved, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, that the Zoning Board .of Appeals
recommend approval of a variation to reduce file number of non-cooforming parking spaces
by one, and to eliminate the required loading dock 'for the restaurant at 1702 Algonquin
Road.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Pratt, Saviaho, Cassidy, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None r
The :motion carried by a vote of b-0. This reco`rutiendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
Tavid M. Clements,
bire'ctor of Planning
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
T I
AUGUST 17, 1992
ZBA-51-V-92
JAMESON'S CHARHOUSE
1702 ALGONQUIN ROAD
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Business Retail & Service District
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A.R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The petitioners are requesting a variation from Section 14.3003 to reduce the existing non-
conforming parking by one space, and to eliminate the required loading facility for a
restaurant in order to construct an enclosed refuse area.
Summary of application: The application indicated that the petitioners wish to abandon the
designated loading dock for the restaurant located at 1702 Algonquin Road. As a result of
the new enclosure, a parking space will be eliminated. The petitioners have indicated that
the enclosed area is the only logical space for an enclosed garbage area and in their opinion
a loading dock serves no practical function for this business. The petitioners also indicated
that the structure will be aesthetically pleasing and be an integral, architecturally
complementing part of the existing building.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: This site was developed in 1986 as part of the
"Algonquin Shopping Center." The site plan dated April 7, 1986 shows a 23,050 sq. ft. one
and two-story brick building along Dempster Street and the 5,800 sq. ft. one-story brick
building which is Jameson's Charhouse. At development, the site required 116 parking
spaces and the developers provided 138 parking spaces. The plan indicates the designated
loading area of 12'x 30' with a note on the pian which states "trash containers located inside
this building. They shall only be brought outside for trash collection purposes."
The current parking and loading standards would require 92 spaces for the office and retail
area and 58 spaces for the restaurant for a total of 150 spaces, which is 12 more than
currently provided. The Ordinance also requires a 12'x 35' loading area for the restaurant.
Because this is not a change of use, a variation to the number of parking spaces required
is not necessary. The request is to reduce the existing number of parking and loading
facilities.
The loading dock, in staffs opinion, is a necessary feature to a restaurant because fresh
produce and supplies are required on a frequent basis. The elimination of the designated
loading area leaves another area which could be used for loading, however, maneuvering
a vehicle in a full parking lot may be difficult. Staff would ask that the petitioner be
prepared to discuss the delivery of goods to the restaurant and the normal hours and
frequency of the deliveries. A striping plan should also be developed so that employees and
guests are aware of the loading area and parking areas.
The Engineering Division has indicated that existing drainage patterns should not be altered.
The Inspection Services Department would like to remind the petitioner that a building
permit is required to finish this project, should the variation be granted.
It is the opinion of the Planning staff that a variation to allow the reduction in parking by
one space and the elimination of the designated loading area be approved with the
condition that the area be striped so that delivery vehicles can maneuver in and out of the
area.
CAF
9/21/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1720 WEST ALGONQUIN ROA
WHEREAS, Demetrios Angelos (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 1720 West Algonquin Road (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 3 in Bresler Realty Company Subdivision of that part
of Lot 2 in Edward Busse's Division on part of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 15 and the Northeast Quarter
of Section 22, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian as per plat recorded in the
Recorder's Office of Cook County, Illinois, on December
17, 1919, as Document No. 6696216
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3003 to allow
reduce the number of non -conforming parking space by one space and
a variation to eliminate the. required loading facility for a
restaurant in order to construct an enclosed refuse area; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 51-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of August,
1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Prospect Herald on the 11th day of August, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 51-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the following
variations:
1. A variation from Section 14.3003 allowing the reduction of the
non -conforming parking by one (1) space; and
2. A variation to eliminate the required loading facility for a
restaurant.
The variations granted herein shall be in accordance with the Site
Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A",
for the purpose of allowing construction of an enclosed refuse
area, subject to striping the designated stand loading area.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
ZBA 51-V-92
Page 2 of 2
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of thee Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE; This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
POW"
Iv\
sX
ly
t
at„N planting arca
�, N
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
1/16-
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMD KS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-54-SU-92, DON LUPORINI
LOCATION: 416 SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a Special Use Permit filed by Don Luporini. The applicant is requesting to place a ten foot
diameter satellite antenna in the rear of his property at 416 South Mount Prospect Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 27, 1992.
At the meeting Don Luporini explained the proposed location for the antenna and indicated
that it would be screened by his existing garage, six foot fences and existing landscaping to
the north and south, and by a chain-link fence and landscaping to the west.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that all the standards for a satellite antenna have been met
by the petitioner.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning
Board recommends approval of the Special Use request to allow a 10 foot diameter satellite
antenna in the location indicated on the site plan as submitted by the petitioner.
DMC:hg
5). -fie P!an I loc� - 20 4e-t-
�,
tr
qly
t3 tc2 f G 3 8 �S I �4 tt es
os 1./ i
a�
1 v
n
i,
1'
_ � t
� o arse-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 54 -SU -92 Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER: Don Luporini
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 416 South Mount Prospect Road
PUBLICATION DATE: August 11, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit
as required in Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a
satellite antenna, which is 10 feet in diameter,
in an "R -l" Single Family District.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced ZBA-54-SU-92 at 416 South Mount Prospect Road. This
is a Special Use request to allow a satellite antenna in a R-1 Single Family District.
Mr. Don Luporini introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that he
would like to construct a satellite receiving dish in the rear yard of his home. He stated that
the dish would have an overall height of 10 feet and that it would be located behind an
existing detached garage. He stated that the satellite dish is partially screened from a
neighbor's home by a 6 foot fence, and that there are also mature bushes to the west that
screen the installation from the property owner to the west. He also pointed out that his
property abuts Novak and Parker Appliances to the south, and therefore, the satellite dish
would have no adverse impact. Mr. Luporini also explained that he discussed this with his
neighbors and that they had no objections.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe stated that the antenna would be located 27 feet from the rear property fine and
5 feet from the side property line, and that there is an existing 6 foot fence and mature
landscaping to help screen the satellite dish from adjoining properties. Mr. Forsythe then
summarized the Special Use standards of the Zoning Ordinance for a satellite dish, and
ZBA,-54-SU-92
Page 2
indicated that the proposed installation by the petitioner met all appropriate standards of
the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Fizsythe stated that staff would recommend approval of the
request.
No one appeared to speak in f4vor or in opposition to the Special Use application. ,
Mr. Basnik asked if the satellite dish was for%television or radio reception, and the petitioner
stated that it was for television reception `
There being no further dis , ssa an, Chaarm asnik asked for a motion. Mr. Brettrager
moved, seconded by W. Ptah, `that the Zorng Board of Appeals recommend approval of
a Special Use Permit to a11ov , satellite dia at416 South MountProspect Road.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, SaviPratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: Nonw
The motion carried by a voteof�-0. This re)"cammendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
TP
r
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT.
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIE,- CHAIRMAN
RAY P. FORSYrHE, PLANNET'P<
AUGUST 17, 1992
ZBA-54-SU-92
DON LUPORINI
416 SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 8,104 sq. It.
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A.R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit as required in Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow
a satellite antenna, which is 10 feet in diameter, in an "R-1" Single Family District.
Summary of application: The application indicates that a satellite antenna, 10 ft. in
diameter, is to be located approximately 27 ft, from the rear property line and 5 ft. from the
side property line. The applicant has indicated that there is an existing 6 ft. fence along the
side yard with mature landscaping on the adjacent property and a 4 ft. cyclone fence with
landscaping to the rear.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The Zoning Ordinance allows a satellite antenna in
residential areas provided a Special Use Permit is granted. There are several standards a
resident must meet in order for the Special Use Permit to be considered. Following is a
summary of the standards:
1. The maximum diameter of a dish shall not exceed eleven feet (11'). The
proposed dish is 10 ff in diameter.
2. The dish shall be located entirely behind the rear building line and shall not
be located within any required side or rear yard. The proposed location is in
a permitted area.
3. Any dish exceeding forty inches (40") in diameter shall be mounted on the
ground. The proposed dish is ground -mounted.
4. No more than one satellite antenna shall be installed on a lot. Only one dish
is proposed.
5. No dish shall be located closer than ten feet (10') from a principal building
or structure. The location exceeds 10 feet from the dwelling unit.
6. Any ground -mounted dish shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height above
grade. The proposed dish is 12 ft. in height.
7. All ground -mounted satellite antennas shall be installed and landscaped so as
to be compatible with surrounding properties. The antenna will be located
behind the existing garage and screened to the north by a 6 ft. fence and
mature landscaping. To the south is a parking lot for the Novak and Park
Appliance Store. To the west is a cyclone fence with some low landscaping.
There also is additional landscaping on the neighbor's property to the west.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
There were no negative comments received from other Village staff. All required building
permits are required should the Special Use Permit be granted.
SUMMARY-MCQNDAITFIO
It is the opinion of the planning staff that a Special Use Permit be granted to the petitioner
to allow a satellite antenna, as indicated on the submitted site plan, as all appropriate
standards have been met.
DMC:hg
CAF/
9/21/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 416 SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
WHEREAS, Don Luporini (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property located
at 416 South Mount Prospect Road (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 66 in Maplewood Heights, being a subdivision of the
east 15.00 chains of that part lying North of railroad of
Southeast Quarter of Section 12 (except the southerly 66
feet of the road) also of Block 26 in Busse's Eastern
Addition to Mount Prospect, in the East Half of Section
12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois;
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use, as required in Section
14.1101.C.6, to allow a satellite antenna, which is ten feet (101)
in diameter in an R-1, Single Family District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use,
being the subject of ZBA 54 -SU -92, before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of August,
1992, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the
Mount Prospect Herald on the 11th day of August, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees to grant the
Special Use being the subject of ZBA 54 -SU -92.
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and
have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village
and that granting the Special Use requested in ZBA 54 -SU -92 would
be in the best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Special Use to the subject
property to permit a satellite antenna ten feet (100) in diameter,
and subject to meeting all applicable standards of Section
14.1101.C.6.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
FEE
ZBA 54 -SU -92
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1992.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE MANAGER
6w:
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-58-V-92, EDWARD WOJDYLA
LOCATION: 515 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by Edward Wojdyla. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.1102.A to allow a front yard setback of 23'-6" instead of the minimum required
30 feet, to allow the construction of a porch with overhead roof.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Ed Wojdyla explained that he is a long-time resident of this home and that
his mother had recently moved in with his family. The addition to the family has required
them to design plans for an addition to the second floor of the home. At the same time,
the architect designed a new porch with overhead roof. He indicated that the porch was
aesthetically pleasing and would make it more convenient for his mother to gain access to
the home.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that the dormer additions were allowed. The porch
however, required a variation. Mr. Forsythe indicated that staff has concerns with the mass
of this structure as it runs the length of the home. He went on to say that staff could not
support the entire width of the house but would support a request for a porch with overhead
roof if it was only placed in front of the door.
Several neighbors spoke in favor of the request. The neighbors felt this was a good request
and felt that the proposed porch would be a good addition to the neighborhood as well as
add value to the surrounding properties.
The Zoning Board members discussed the request and felt that the petitioner has done a
good job in getting support from so many neighbors. By a vote of 5-1 the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 6'-6" porch to the existing
structure which would result in a front yard setback of 23'-6".
DMC:hg
i" Ari PL F. 1 7
c
r �
OE � 4 ce
7dd Z :l
legwrG�� f
� N �� c�H6✓i�'b'"��C ' � a O
a r !
O
'+t t aY CF..i�'•✓r NIc1 p '. F �J�,.�4f Vic✓ ,G OGi t" C!�Nr�
• It
e 0/p`Ayq
4 u � c sroer e.P�cr' ti
p o
,,. * (r r ♦� . ;� - G P t om/ / ./� ✓ A
".T?. � � �I • i co...t�' 4i+f0,✓ opt•.
Q { S+n
(yj' rnza
h a rn - p q
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO, 58-V-92
Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER:
Edward Wojdyla
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
515 North Fairview Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 11, 1992
REQUEST.
A variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a
front, yard setback of 23'-6" instead of the
minimum required 30 ft, to allow the
construction of a porch with overhead roof.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michae'le Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT.
Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Chairman Basnik then introduced ZBA-58-V-92, a request by Edward Wojdyla at 515 North
Fairview; to allow a front yard setback of 23'-6" instead of the required 30 foot setback to
allow the construction of a porch with an overhead roof.
Mr. Wojdyla introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that he was a
long-time resident of Mount Prospect and that recently his mother-in-law had moved in with
his family and that there was a need to construct an additional bedroom. He stated that as
a result of conversations with an architect, the overall appearance of the home could be
improved with the second floor bedroom construction, if a covered porch were constructed
on the front of the house. He stated that this would require removal of an existing front
stoop and the evergreens in front of the house, and that the coveredporch would offer more
room and weather protection for his family. He stated that he had reviewed the staff report
which had suggested reducing the bulk of the encroachment in the required front yard, and
stated that his architect had indicated that the overhang could be cut back to a 5 foot
dimension if a different roof pitch was used. Mr. Wojdyla stated that he had talked with
a number of his neighbors about the request and showed them elevation drawings of the
home and that all of the neighbors had indicated support for the variation.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe noted that the petitioner would like to construct a 6'-6" porch, the entire length of
i
ZBA-58-V-92
1
r, . Page 2
4,
the house, that would reduce theflequired 36400t front yard to 23'-6". He stated that the
Zoning Ordinance allows opens steps and terraces in a front yard and eaves to encroach 18
inches. Because the petitionerwpuld like to';#oistruct a porch with an overhead roof, this
variation became necessary. Mr ;Forsythe stied that staff is concerned about the bulk of
the addition, and questions if the; porch size too great considering the existing setbacks
of this block. Mr. Forsythe stated that all hordes seem to be at a uniform setback and that
staff would be reluctant to see a dont yard r(Muced when you have an established setback
pattern on a block. Mr. Forsythe explainedl hat perhaps the bulk of the encroachment
could be reduced from being ,thn entire length, of the house, to perhaps a revised roof
treatment extending over the front door to pro'yide some of the character that the petitioner
is hoping to establish. He indicated that he *4eves staff could support a revised request
that provided ;for a porch, but that did not ekiend the entire length of the house.
%E
Chairman Basnik then asked for%comments from the audience. The following resident's
spoke in support of the application. Helen lAnderson, 521 Fairview, Paul Kasellco, 517
Fairview, Greg Warmine, 515 Fairview, Bob'�eale, 520 Fairview. Mr. Basnik stated that
he encourages and appreciatespetitioners working with neighbors and stated that this
definitely helps the public hearing process
Mr. Brettrager hada question about the second floor addition and the width of the dormers,
and he discussed the appearance/Df the dormer addition.
Chairman Basnik stated that this is a large efferoachment and he understands the concerns
and positions of the staff, but he,,elieves that the overall plan has been well thought out
and that this improves the appearne of the h",/' e' and that neighborhood support indicates
that there would be no adverse impact
Mr. Cassidy :stated that the petitioner had ,oeihonstrated some hardship, and that the
proposed variation helps solve ;the needs of the petitioner.
Mr. Basnik questioned the perc6it of lot coverage, and Mr. Forsythe indicated that the
property has a 35% lot coverage:%
Mrs. Skowron questioned the last%time the Zoning Board of Appeals had approved a front
ti
yard encroachment, and stated thaClt in her memp„ ory this had been a variation that the Zoning
Board is typically very stringent pn, and tha� others had been denied. She believed a
perspective on past requests is important, even with the support of the neighbors.
tf,
Mr. Basnik stated that he believes part of thereuest is due to the narrow 50 foot lot.
Mrs. Skowron stated that the petitioner had previously stated he would compromise on the
amount of encroachment and reduce the root%pitch to provide for a 5 foot encroachment,
and she asked if the Zoning -B4ard was wring to consider the petitioner's suggested
compromise.
ZBA-58-V-92.
Page 3
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and indicated they would support the
application as filed by the petitioner.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion. Mr. Cassidy
moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a variation to allow a 23'-
6" required front yard, rather than the 30 ft. setback for the property at 515 North Fairview.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: Skowron
The motion carried by a vote of 5-1. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
44 COMAV-�-
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNEIff
DATE:
AUGUST 17, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-58-V-92
APPLICANT:
EDWARD WOJDYIA
ADDRESS:
515 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
Iillllltt
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R.:
R-1 Single Family Residential
7,238 sq. ft.
(current) 31.28%; (proposed) 34.30%
Front Yard: (current) 25% (proposed) 35%
.23
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a front yard setback
of 23'-6" instead of the minimum required 30 ft. to allow the construction of a porch with
overhead roof.
Summary of application: The petitioners would like to construct a 6-6" x 33-7.5" porch
with an overhead roof along the entire width of their home. The petitioners are adding
dormers to the second story which do not require variations and would like to construct the
porch at the same time. The application indicates that the existing concrete stoop is in
disrepair and the evergreens are overgrown. 11ey believe the porch and roof will enhance
the architecture of the home and the character of the neighborhood.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The Zoning Ordinance allows open steps or a terrace
to encroach into the front yard setback. The Ordinance also allows eaves to overhang the
front yard setback up to a maximum of 18 inches. Because the petitioner would like to
construct a porch with an overhead root a variation is necessary. The variation request is
to allow a porch with overhead roof to encroach the front yard setback 6'-6" the entire
width of the house (33-7.5"). This leaves a front yard setback of 23'-6" instead of the
required 30 feet.
The petitioner has indicated that the proposed porch is requested to replace the dilapidated
steps and overgrown evergreens. Staff is concerned with the bulk of the addition and
questions if the porch size is too great considering the existing setbacks on this block.
OTHER DEPA&IMENTALCOMME
There were no negative comments received from other Village staff members. Inspection
Services would like to remind the petitioner that should the variation be approved, a
building permit is required.
SUMMARYMCOMMEMMMN
It is the recommendation of the Planning staff that the variation request to allow a covered
porch to extend 6'-6" into the front yard setback along the entire width of the house be
denied. All other homes on this, block are built at the same setback, and this proposed
covered porch would encroach into the established setback of this block. However, staff
would support a porch/roof combination at the front door of the house. This would
minimize the bulk of the encroachment from being the entire length of the house, and allow
a revised roof treatment extending over the front door that still provides some of the
character that the petitioner is hoping to establish.
DMC:hg
CAF
9/21/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 515 NORTH FAIRVIEW
WHEREAS, Edward Wojdyla (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
515 North Fairview (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property),
legally described as:
Lot 19 in Block 3 in Prospect Manor, being a subdivision
of part of the South 3/4 of the West Half of the West
Half of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of
the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.A to
allow a front yard setback of twenty-three feet six inches (231
611), instead of the required thirty feet in order to allow the
construction of a porch with overhead roof; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 58-V-92 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
August, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 11th day of August, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 58-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102.A to allow a twenty-three foot six inch (23,
611) front yard setback, rather than the required 301.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
N FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
ZBA 58-V-92
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
-
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF
9/23/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 400 NORTH FOREST AVENUE
WHEREAS, Charles C. Davies (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 400 North Forest Avenue (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 8 in Brickman's Resubdivision of Lots 1 to 5 both
inclusive in Block 1 in Arthur T. McIntosh and Co.'s
Northwest Meadows, being a subdivision in the East Half
of Section 33, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.102 to allow
a five foot (51) separation between a principal structure and an
accessory building, rather than the required 10 feet, in order to
construct a two -car detached garage; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 55-V-92, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
August, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the M_ount Prospect Herald on the 11th day of August, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 55-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102 to allow a five foot (51) separation between
the principal structure and an accessory building in order to
construct a 2 -car detached garage, subject to the following
conditions:
1. The garage shall be set back a minimum of thirty feet (301)
from the exterior sideyard property line.
2. The existing garage door from the former attached garage and
the existing driveway shall be removed within one (1) year.
3. The east garage wall shall be lined with Class X 5/811 drywall.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
ZBA 55-V-92
Page 2 of 2
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER W../
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1992
SUBJECT: ADDITION TO SENIOR CENTER
As you requested, this memo responds to certain questions about the addition to the Senior
Center, and the condition of the existing parking lot:
1. Herb Weeks lists the life expectancy of the existing parking lot at approximately five
years.
2. The Senior Center addition will add impervious area to the overall site. Any
required detention would only be for the amount of additional impervious surface.
However, this addition is not subject to the provisions of the Development Code.
See Item #3 below.
3. The Development Code requires certain upgrades when an addition is more than
25% of the area of the existing structure. The 1,900 square foot addition to the
Senior Center is an addition of 16%. Therefore, Development Code items such as
detention and parking lot curbing are not required.
4. Herb Weeks describes the maintenance program on the existing parking lot as spot
repairs consisting of replacing deteriorating areas with new base and surface. He
believes the parking lot life can be extended to his five year estimate with this
program.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael E. Janoni'm e Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning
DATE: September 11, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-62-V-92
LOCATION: 50 South Emerson
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
variation requests filed by the Village of Mount Prospect. The request is to allow the
following variations so that a one-story 1,900 square foot addition to the Senior Citizen
Center can be constructed:
1. A variation to Section 14.1803 to allow a maximum land coverage of 90.05% instead
of the maximum 75%.
2. A variation to Section 14.3012 to allow the current 39 parking spaces instead of the
required 55 spaces.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 10,
1992. At the meeting David Clements explained that the current budget for the Village
includes the proposed addition. Nancy Morgan, Human Services Administrator discussed
with the Zoning Board members the shortage of space for Human Service employees and
that many alternatives had been looked at and the proposed addition was the best solution
to their needs.
Dave Clements indicated that the area that the addition is to be located is behind the Senior
Center, and that the small park is under-utilized open space. He stated that this location
is best for the addition, as no parking is removed and only minor interior alterations are
necessary in the existing building. Mr. Clements also indicated that the office addition
would not generate a demand for more parking, and that his helps justify the parking
variation.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and determined that helping solve the
space needs of the Human Services Division was important, and that loss of the small park
site was minor as it was not extensively used. Also, parking needs will not increase as a
result of the addition.
By a vote of 5-0, the Zoning Board recommends approval of the following variations to
allow the additions to the Senior Center:
1. A variation to Section 14.1803 to allow a maximum land coverage of 90.05% instead
of the maximum 75%.
2. A variation to Section 14.3012 to allow the current 39 parking spaces instead of the
required 55 spaces.
RF:cl
Y' CALV. STEEL CONDUIT. 30' DEEP ITYPI
-WAN
-�4' PVC SCN 40. 30' DEEP ITYP1
.-_. �.'"s�,c,w....w........,..,.. � �P?5.���,xi, .._�-.m:S7".,, .. _...:-...- .. .,.>-. .....�.-. -._., _._: _t.-,.:..-. ._, .t.-.....m..w...•u-w `
s�
/�
�,a2L
67.161
/ 5'�D
62.20 X9.70 ,..__.
9.05u
n
'0. .69. TO • Fa.µ wool. ..
60
04
� f x
l
62.00
2-- �— �'-p *-1 ►-- — ►— ►--:---- �`---"", --1--- i�— �--►-- �� — wl, 62.62
D3 '� 1 1R, fi9bA 192'-t2' U 0.50%
63.61
63.61 ///
\.. Rf NOVE STR. E.
I SEE SPECSI ( ♦♦ / 4/
i,r` �'ri *FW✓,. 40.9 •
��µ_- ..n•__..,...., L.L.. µ
it l'j7
t
1� ry
A•'
Ip, L,,INIC � o
i
�..tL L.� _I I _ r� -1 _ 1 "C.. t '::. t �_ -1 1 _ -r 1- r --r` L. - ti t -I -il
C C w 7 7 1 L' C C I. 7. 7 1 I` 1 L
7"_7_._]I-I__I_ = J7
_____-_-----,._,____..,__________________,__-_.,.__----_---------_____---_--------___
bR,�l
BJ S ` L. AV
ly 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 62-V-92 Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 50 South Emerson Street
PUBLICATION DATE: August 26, 1992
REQUEST: The following variations are requested in order
to allow a 40.5' x 47' addition to the existing
structure: 1.) A variation to -Section 14.11103 to
allow a maximum land coverage ,of 90.05%
instead of the maximum 75%. 2.) A variation
from the minimum required parking spaces of
55 to allow the current 39 spaces.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
CbWrnm Basnik then introduced ZBA-62-V-92 being a request by the Village of Mount
Prospect for variations to allow the construction of an addition to the Senior Center.
Chairman Basnik then swore in David Clements, Director of Planning, prior to his
testimony.
statedthat the I on is necessary to solve space needs for staff in the building. Clements
that Human # #.. #., Nancy Morgan, present # she would
Clementsaddress the space needs matter.
discussed the lot# # # # W •,.
p
noted that the addition is tc
open space on-site. He cot
addition can be constructed
this location is important b,
Center and can be construct
that eliminating the park is
setback, such as a front yard
that the area of the park hai
the Village acquiring the bu
Concerning the parking var
requirean increase in parkin
number of spaces for the Se
the building. He noted that
the V & G Printers, availab.
staff used the 39 spaces imin
these are the spaces that are
noted that senior parkers spi
most important point to n
necessary for existing staff
Clements concluded and star
is no new parking demand a
not contribute to a parking
Nancy Morgan then introdu
space need problem for apl
grown, that several part -tier
Coordinator office is at the
position:would be brought in
help the efficiency of the Na
sharing office space and a st
some social workers need dpi
the one-story 'addition is the
story addition was consideree
for an elevator, this idea wa
it was originally constructed
Center, and that the best ust
at the building.
No one appeared to speak i
Chairman Basnik then aske4
the addition only meets the
roomfor future space need!
ample room; for the future c
z
f 1 P;
nstructed an area of a sm�
and afamed that this is th
xP
It will no �elirninate parking s
it matches upwith ;existing,
out sigruf ant interior alteral
aesthetic issue, as this is nc
iv
pro mune tly visible from a si
the locatiin of a parking lot
.wr. Clem fi�rias stated that the
as with th taddiitional office sl
nter is 5`.i,'0ani there are 39 sp
e recent parking lot expansio
Ing had irfcreased over 50 sp,
r north of% he building for the
llyused fr day-to-day needs
to the arch of the recent park
h the aditin, is that the
it no ney± staff will be brou
as a result of the addition pt
,niorCent er °so the proposed
n at the fucxl%ty,
self to ZWhg Board and st,
tely five
o/ ars at the facility.
ions have become full-time,
Works faciity an Central R
;enior Cef tet with the new ac
a' 6'x
needs
rs ago, butt that it is not 'use
open spade v►lould be to sols
R, ;
n
or in op/rasttionto the req
IR/1
.-92
park, thereby, reducing
,ly location where the
.s. He also noted that
;e space in the Senior
;. Mr. Clements noted
i important landscape
t. He also pointed out
the old library prior to
ring Ordinance would
He said the required
s immediately north of
the former location of
Mr. Clements stated
ation request, because
he Senior Center. He
expansion and that the
itional office space is
into the facility. Mr.
ling office space, there
rease in floor area will
that there has been a
ie stated that staff has
I that the Network 50
. She stated that this
on; and that this would
ty. She explained that
;ms, and that a second
;osts and requirements
was a good idea when
patrons of the Senior
space needs problems
, Mr. Cassidy asked if
;re would be sufficient
the addition provides'
ZBA-62-V-92
Page 3
Mr. Lannon questioned the concept of the two story addition. Ms. Morgan stated that this
was an earlier option, but that new requirements for ADA law would require an elevator,
andcostfactors were approximately double the present budget for the facility.
Ms. Skowron asked Ms. Morgan if she felt the addition would benefit the entire Village, and
she explained that the addition is at the Senior Center, but that users of the Senior Center
are just one phase of activities for the Human Services Division. Ms. Skowron asked if
office space could be provided in the Village Hall, and Ms. Morgan stated there is no space
available of sufficient size to meet her staffing problems. Ms. Skowron pointed out that she
is always concerned about increasing impervious surface with a variation request and that
the 4% involved with this application is a notable increase.
Mr. Lannon concurred and stated that this is an area of comb* d sewers and while there
me
is a parking lot storm sewer, this does drain to a combined sewer that can conceivably
contribute to sewer back-up problems downstream. Mr. Clements noted that with the
addition of storm sewers in the parking lot, the drainage problem is better than it has been
in the past.
Mr. Basnik questioned how many residents used the Senior Center, and Ms. Morgan stated
there are 800 seniors a week at the facility.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Cassidy moved, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend
approval of a lot coverage variation to allow 90% lot coverage, and a parking variation to
reduce the 55 parking spaces to 39 to allow an addition at the Senior Center at 50 South
Emerson Street.
I Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None *
The motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
6M - uhnk�
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS'
GIL BASNIIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID X CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-62-V-92
APPLICANT- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECT SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
ADDRESS: 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
LOCATION MAP:
I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-2
LOT SIZE: 33,228 sq. ft
% COVERAGE: (current) 85.67% (proposed 90.05%
FA.R.: N/A
U
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect'Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The following variations are requested in order to allow a 1,900 sq. ft. addition to the
Mount Prospect Senior Center;
1. A variation to Section 14.1803 to allow a maximum land coverage of 90.05% instead
of the maximum 75%.
2. A variation to Section 14.3012 to allow the current 39 parking spaces instead of the
required 55 spaces.
ZONINGPLANNING AND
Summary of application: In the current fiscal year budget, the Village Board included
funding for an addition to the Senior Center. The addition is necessary to solve space needs
for staff in the building. The addition provides five offices and needed storage space.
Nancy Morgan, Human Services Administrator, will be in attendance at the Zoning Board
meeting to further explain the space needs issue. .
The addition will be located on the west side of the building, in an offset area that is
currently a small park or sitting area. This location is the only area available to
accommodate the addition. The new office space will tie into the existing floor plan of the
Senior Center without interior alterations, and this location avoids eliminating parking.
Two variations as noted above are necessary to allow construction of the addition.
1. Lot Coverage Variation The existing B-2 Zoning District provides for a maximum
75% lot coverage. The existing Senior Center is non -conforming at 85.6% lot
coverage. The proposed addition increases lot coverage to 90%. The addition is to
be constructed in the area of a small park, thereby reducing open space on-site. This
park is under-utilized, users of the facility do not generally have activities in the
park.
Because this is the only location where the addition can be constructed, it is
necessary to eliminate the park and increase lot coverage. Eliminating the park is
not an aesthetic issue as it is not an important landscape setback and it's location
behind the Senior Center is not visible to the public. However, storm water run-
off will increase as a result of the addition. It should be noted that storm sewers
were installed in the most recent expansion of the parking lot, the former location
of V & G Printers. This will help address the increased stormwater run-off.
2. Parking Vgnation. The Zoning Ordinance requires an increase in parking spaces
with additional office space. The required number of spaces for the Senior Center
with the addition is .55 spaces. There are 39 spaces immediately north of the
building. In processing this variation request, staff used the 39 spaces as these are
typically utilized by the Senior Center. However, the parking lot expansion at the
former V & G Printers location increased parking to over 50 spaces. Senior Center
parkers frequently spill over into this area. Shopper parking is also available with
the Busse Avenue parking lot. Parking is available for most day -today needs of the
Senior Center.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
While this helps justify the parking variation, it is important to note that no new staff
will be added as a result of the addition, so parking demand is no different than
existing conditions.
OTHER DEPARTMENTAL C
1. The Engineering Division states that this is an area of combined sewers, however,
storm sewers are available in part of the parking lot.
2. Roof drains shall discharge at grade.
3. The addition is to be sprinkled with a two year period to sprinkle the entire building.
Staff would recommend approval of the two variations in order to allow construction of the
addition. The lot coverage increase is minor. The park area is the only place the addition
can be constructed, and it eliminates under-utilized open space that is best put to use as
office area to solve staff space needs. The additional office space will not increase parking
demand at the Senior Center, so there will be no changes in the parking situation at the
facility.
DMC:hg
CAF/
9/21/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
(MOUNT PROSPECT SENIOR rITIZEN CENTER BUILDING)
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14
of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly located at 50 South Emerson Street (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lots 8, 9, 10 and 11 in Busse and Wille's Resubdivision
in Mount Prospect in the West Half of Section 12,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1803 to allow
a maximum land coverage of 90.05%, instead of the permitted maximum
of 75% and a variation from Section 14.3012 to allow 39 parking
spaces, instead of the required 55 parking spaces, in order to
construct an addition to the senior citizen Center Building; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 62-V-92 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 10th day of
September, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 26th day of August,
1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant the following:
1. A variation from Section 14.1803 to allow a maximum land
coverage of 90,05%, rather than the permitted maximum of 75%.
2. A variation from Section 14.3012 to allow 39 parking spaces,
rather than the required number of 55 spaces.
The variations granted herein shall be in accordance with the Site
Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
ZBA 62-V-92
Page 2 of 2
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of
this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
,1992.
fzl GKv. STCCL COMOUIT. 30' 0ES► (TT►,
�," PVC SCM 40. 30' KCP , TTP,
l�
aCd �nj� Ito'
'17.13 ,_ %� �,.....�,� o . _ .,� _�.-.. - __• _.. ==- -- - _.....�
637."
or ,suvc
sncs, c"
e r` �, INK
j
i
i
P3�C
MTA, •
I7C=-C 1.7 t- ]_LI `' i_`;_`CJ.�S i t7 7_3- 1- I_1
1.1_I1_
7 _]7_I _TI__l"P.C_C_.C._C_1_-7'_],_I
_._,_.__._...,___.__.._._____-,_----_--„----------_.-_--_,-----_--_- ------------------
BUS-'.L
_,________..___
evS-.L AV
F_ �i)IT "K”
41
r
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois l�
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR
DATE: OCTOBER 1, 1992
SUBJECT: CHARLIE CLUB SIGN
Background
This case was originally heard by the Sign Review Board on May 4. The motion was to
recommend denial of the request for the text amendment for off -premise signs as a special
use. On July 21, the Village Board heard the request by Charlie Club for the special use
text amendment to allow off -premise. After hearing testimony, the Village Board referred
the case back to the Sign Review Board for further public testimony and recommendation.
Mr. Vavrus, owner of the Charlie Club, his attorney Mr. Greg Dose, and Donald Anderson,
Senior Vice President of Park National Bank met with Messrs. Fritz and Clements to discuss
a possible solution to signage issues regarding the Charlie Club and Park National Bank.
As a result of this meeting, staff together with Mr. Dose proposed a text amendment to be
added to the special use section of the Sign Ordinance that would permit off -premise
business identification signs when contiguous to a parcel having major street frontage,
provided there is no increase in the number of freestanding signs on the property allowed
by the Ordinance.
The Sign Review Board reconsidered the request on September 14. After taking the
testimony into consideration and the recommendation by staff after the joint meeting with
Charlie Club and Park National Bank, the Board made the following motion. A motion was
made by Hal Predovich, seconded by Elizabeth Luxem, that Section 7.701 be modified by
adding the phrase "and off -premise business identification signs" and adding a new
paragraph e. to Section 7.330 entitled " Off -Premises Business Identification Signs", spelling
out conditions that would provide that:
a. this sign directs attention to a business located on the lot adjacent to the lot on
which the sign is located;
Michael E. Jannis
Page 2
October 1, 1992
b. the sign may contain changeable copy directing attention to products, services, and
promotions of the identified business provided the standards of Section 7.325.E are
met;
c. the sign must be on a lot which is adjacent to a major arterial street;
d. an easement or a license must have been granted allowing erection of the sign;
and the number of freestanding signs allowed by this Chapter on a lot on which the
sign is located shall not be increased.
The vote on the motion to recommend approval to the Village Board was 5 ayes, 0 nays.
The Village Board would be asked to consider amending the text of the Sign Ordinance to
incorporate these changes into the appropriate sections. If approved, the second step by the
petitioner would be to seek a special use under the new provisions of the ordinance for site
specific signs for both Charlie Club and Park National Bank
KHF:hg
i
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE L
MOUNT PROSPECT SIGN REVIEW BOARD
September 14, 1992 VEP 241W
CALL TO ORDER:
The regular meeting of the Sign Review Board (SRB) was officially called to order by
Chairperson Adelaide Thulin at 7:35 p.m. on Monday, September 14, 1992 at the Village
Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Members of the SRB present: Richard Rogers, Warren Kostak, Elizabeth Luxem, Hal
Predovich and Chairperson Adelaide T'hulin. Also present were Nick Gianaris; President
of Triangle Sign Company; Gregory Dose, Attorney for Charles Vavrus; Donald Anderson,
Park National Bank; Attorney for Park National Bank and Kenneth Fritz, Economic Develop-
ment Coordinator.
RE"j&-f&2XII �Xurtrir MT,
This case was referred back to the Sign Review Board by the Village Board of Trustees.
The petitioner seeks a text amendment of the Sign Ordinance, Section 7.330 and Section 7.701
to create a special use for off -premise signs. This case was continued from August 31 at the
request of the petitioner. The Sign Review Board had earlier heard the request to amend
the text of the Ordinance on April 20 and May 4. The action taken by the Sign Review Board
at the May 4 meeting was to recommend denial of the text amendment for off -premise signs
as a special use to the Village Board. The motion passed 4 ayes, 1 nay, Adelaide Thulin,
voting nay.
The amortization schedule contained in the Sign Ordinance required the existing non-
conforming Charlie Club sign to be corrected as of January 1, 1992. The ordinance was
interpreted by staff considering the Charlie Club sign as off -premise and therefore not
permitted to be placed on another property.
Erroneous information was presented at the May 4 public hearing which indicated that Mr.
Vavrus at one time owned the parcel of land subsequently purchased by Park National Bank.
Mr. Vavrus indicated that he, at no time owned the Park National Bank parcel. He did,
however, indicate that a sign easement was conveyed to him by the previous land owner at
the time the Health Club was built on his property to the west. Mr. Vavrus also indicated
that he paid for the improvements of Midway Drive and the deceleration lane on Elmhurst
Road, in front of the Park National Bank.
Villagg Board Dinussion
At the July 21 Village Board meeting, it was the general consensus of the Mayor and Village
Board that staff, together with the private parties involved, namely, Park National Bank and
Charlie Club work together toward a solution that would result in Park National Bank and
Charlie Club having freestanding signs adjacent to Elmhurst Road. It was recognized, the
first step toward such a resolution was to amend the text of the ordinance to permit off -
premise business identification signs as a special use. Thereafter, a separate request would
Sign Review Board Minutes
Page 2
be made to the Sign Review Board to seek a special use permit for an off -premise business
identification sign.
In the afternoon of September;14, Mr. Charles Vavrus, owner of Charlie Club, Greg Dose,
attorney for Charlie Club, and Donald Anderson, Senior Vice President of the Park National
Bank met with Messrs. Fritz and Clements to discuss a possible solution to signage issues
regarding Charlie Club and Park National Bank. The following conclusions resulted from
this meeting.
1. Park National Bank suggested a separate sign for Charlie Club and Park National
Bank. The Bank's suggestion was to install a Park National Bank sign adjacent to
Elmhurst Road, centered on their building, and for Charlie Club to install a sign on
the south parkway of Midway Drive on public right-of-way.
2. Neither party desired to,share a sign because of the need for separate identification.
3. Mr. Vavrus wished to place a new sign meeting the new criteria for area height and
setback on the recorded sign easement granted to him earlier in 1980.
4. Staff worked on a proposed text amendment which offered apotential solution which:
a. Makes a distinction between business identification signs and outdoor advertising
or billboard signs.
b. Properly addresses the unusual nature and circumstances of a sign on contiguous
property not having direct access to a major roadway.
c. Permits signage adjacent to Elmhurst Road for Park National Bank.
As a result of this meeting, staff together with the attorney for Charlie Club, Mr. Dose,
proposed a text amendment to be: added to the special use section of the Sign Ordinance
that would permit off -premise business identification signs when contiguous to a parcel
having major street frontage, provided there is no increase in the number of freestanding
signs on the property allowed by the ordinance.
i
After carefully taking into consideration the facts in the case as updated by Mr. Vavrus, Mr.
Dose and Mr. Anderson, as well as the staff recommendation fora solution,a motion was
made by Hal Predovich, seconded by Elizabeth Luxem that stated Section 7.701 be modified
by adding the phrase, "and off -premise business identification signs," and adding a new
paragraph e. to Section 7.330 entitled "Off -Premises Business Identification Signs," spelling
out conditions that would provide that:
a. the sign directs attention to a business located on the lot adjacent to the lot on
which the sign is located.
Sign Review Board Minutes
Page 3
b. the sign may contain changeable copy directing attention to products, services, and
promotions of the identified business provided the standards of Section 7.325.E are
met;
c. the sign must be on a lot which is adjacent to a major arterial street;
d. an easement or a license must have been granted allowing erection of the sign;
and the number of freestanding signs allowed by this Chapter on a lot on which the
sign is located shall not be increased.
The vote on the motion was 5 ayes, 0 nays.
Mr. Nicholas Gianaris, construction manager for Lunan Family Restaurant, owners of the
Shoney's franchise in Mount Prospect, presented his case for increasing the number of lines
of changeable copy from two to five on the new freestanding sign. The sign is located at
the southwest corner of Golf and Elmhurst Roads. This request was earlier denied by the
Sign Review Board at the special meeting on August 31. Through a mis-communication
between business owner and sign company, no one was present to make the presentation
in Shoney's behalf. They therefore asked the Board at the next regular meeting to reconsider
their action and open up the meeting for public testimony from the petitioner. The motion
to reconsider was made by Mr. Predovich, seconded by Mr. Rogers to open the discussion.
Mr. Gianaris indicated in his presentation that the existing reader board contains five lines
of copy, is a vital factor in the marketing of Shoney's menu to the customer. He stated that
Shoney's offers three distinct meal periods during the day to three very different audiences.
Each meal period has the ability to offer special promotions to entice people to visit Shoney's
at that specific period. He indicated they use the reader board to advertise the specials during
all these meal periods. He went on to say that Shoney's traffic is impulse motivated and the
reader board provides the necessary opportunity to communicate on this level. He also stated
that to lose the customers attracted by the reader board, they would be unable to maximize
their sales potential projected for this location. They have spent an estimated over $325,000
for equipment and training costs of employees; and at the same time retaining 35 original
WAG employees. He said that any less than 5 lines of changeable copy makes it difficult
to communicate any message.
It was pointed out in the staff report that they were seeking relief through a special use equity
option on the basis of trading -off lines of permanent items of information for additional lines
of changeable copy. The existing sip has only one word, "Shoney's" instead of the maximum
of six permanent items of information together with two lines of changeable copy. Mr. Fritz
passed a copy of photographs showing the passing traffic at this location. He suggested that
three lines of changeable copy seemed appropriate given the trade-off, but that the two lower
lines of copy were sometimes obscured by standing and moving traffic pass the sign.
A motion was made by Mr. Rogers, secone
lines of changeable copy to three on the
information. It was also noted that there is l
as permitted by ordinance. It was then on t
on the motion. The motion was 5 ayes an
ADJOURNMENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 9:55 p.m.
-" NR sneaft
Sign Review Board Minutes
Page 4
by Mr. Predovich, to approve increasing the
Isis of the trade-off of permanent items of
one wall sign instead of the potential of three
basis of these notations that a vote was taken
I nays.
jr,nated,
i `.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
rir�
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONTS, VILLAGE MANAGE
,
DAVID M. CLEMENTSDIRECTOR 0F PL
FROM: NING
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-59-Z-92; 60 -SU -92; 61-V-92, LARRY MCKONE
PRESKI'S RESUBDIVISION AND DEVELOPMENT CODE
MODIFICATIONS - 805 EDGEWOOD LANE
Zoning Reagggs:
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a rezoning, Special Use Permit and variation application filed by Larry McKone. The
applicant is requesting to rezone the property at 805 Edgewood Lane from "R -X' Single -
Family to "R-1" Single -Family. The petitioner is also seeking a Special Use Permit as
required in Section 14.1101.C.8 to allow garages designed to house more than two vehicles,
as well as a variation to Section 14.3016 to allow driveways which are 30' in width instead
of the maximum allowed 21'.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Larry McKone explained that he is interested in rezoning the property to
R-1 Single Family so that a conforming two -lot subdivision can be completed. He indicated
that there are R-1 zoned lots in the area and the lots to the north are smaller than the
proposed lots. He also indicated that he wished to offer three -car garages as an option to
the future home buyers and the variation to driveway width is needed so that it can
adequately serve the wider widths of the garages.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the rezoning will allow for a two- lot subdivision with lots
which are 97' x 119.32' (11,574.04 sq. ft. each). Mr. Forsythe also indicated that this area
of Mount Prospect contains a variety of residential zoning and lot sizes. There is R-1 Single
Family to the east, R -X Single Family (minimum 17,500 sq. ft.) to the west. He also stated
that this area of Mount Prospect is tending to redevelop from large lot homes to rezoning
and redevelopment to "R-1" standards. The lots to the east are large lots however, the
frontage is only 116 feet which would require several lots to resubdivide.
Mr. Forsythe also indicated that three -car garages and wider driveways are a common
request in Mount Prospect. Mr. Forsythe concluded by stating that staff supported the
request because the proposed lots are of a size that large homes in character with the
neighborhood could be built.
-PRELIMINARY PLAT T OT
BEING A RESUBDIVISION IN THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 14, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH,
RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
+- >vutrs LrtvE c7 i s�Guwa� BLVD
'Ct.302Tt4 LIMr, of sNf vsesT
Sic. rli-yt-11
119.72
t..
w
W
o
LOT 1
CO
40 80 J
SCALE IN FEET o
O Q
c 119.52 v
Q T
a
W
0
W o
� O
L Q T 2
W
t1.t
Z
t
33.0
119.32
EASEMENT PROVISIONS
Ars easement I0i sawing the subdivision and other property wrth e
and communications services is hereby roserv,,dto andgmted
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
AND 7-C f CABLE AND
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY,
GRANTEES,
atw. .rr�eevv ald —V -t. try ane Thr, to..s§w. swe+rr+, swA
.,dd.trz,,b— +. .�.Kt.-�.de a...-.«.
and two. Hut ie f.. 9r j(t �O s+tY ih mn yVj el CV 60"s i 4 M 0M PIN old
ther.on. 0- - —h.ied m t-+. —a —.
est., "dobe f- trR ,+vet rr r.st-w tae., tti,ehe..ad mat, . -W t» n
t . Yw tr- -9M m *tsabn .atr -dad P> 111
.vr3x cares... OWtneet.rs..,ett -et iW cta— ms.r iTet+.e' hrr4.. ¢ n, ucort . a
0"V" wOm thodoeed tr m *d a.an ert#�'r+fi*gA ttm ses.t.s-en+.rst otrTre
AAtN n.f�tga d v+y .+�, tes+e..._ Hr. Dred• � tr. wbddrrd.d pre�.ty vhaq adt �.
inn .res.trs.,t s h—by r.vervad fm .td Qe. d to NIORTrWAr# U el'i s GAS CDWA
fsrer aswry .td t V#n . aN dt.iad'+.eeero r — gaster, Wry+Yet. MR. P bft r.
-d ..n.r,,.r t to t=. hx tM ."W— tm.vs. res
ed +*"-,W of gas m..r..d -pp-" r,.vcfs t.r th. P.P— ,A wmq .0
W— -d tr. P. as —A .. -teat percent+. -. r thane. W t>a,
a finer srru to:v. snap o. cs*+ —Ud m a•.etad n any .sea •.a.enwdP .ems_ svtetA
.e athar-v8t�'w'ay� # W-- — .h M .rry :Attar ase Lr +rte. tp_a �.h rt#.rtstt=
rase+v-d .td 9—W tr.raky
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 59-Z-92, ZBA-60-SU-92
ZBA-61-V-91 Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER: Larry McKone
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 805 Edgewood
PUBLICATION DATE: August 11, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting the following:
l.Rezoning from "R -X" Single Family to "R-
1" Single Family to permit a conforming two lot
subdivision. 2. Special Use Permit as required
in Section 14. 1101.C.8 to allow garages designed
to house more than two vehicles. 3. Variation
from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway 30 feet
in width instead of the maximum 21 ft. allowed.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Lorraine Bretaz, 809 Edgewood
Chairman Basnik then introduced ZBA-59-Z-92, ZBA-60-SU-92 and ZBA-61-V-92 from
Mr. Lamy McKone for the property at 805 Edgewood.
Mr. McKone introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated he is purchasing
an existing lot on Edgewood Line that presently has an R -X Single Family classification.
He explained that be is in the process of subdividing this property into two lots with
dimensions of 97 ft. in width and 119 ft. in depth. He stated that, while the R-1 zoning
allows smaller lots than the existing R -X classification on Edgewood, the two proposed lot
sizes are over 11,500 square feet, and that these are very large R-1 lots that would allow the
development of two large custom homes. He stated that he typically builds homes 3,000 to
4,000 square feet, and that these lots are of sufficient dimension to accommodate this large
custom home. He also explained that the Special Use was filed in order to permit the
construction of three -car garages with these homes, and that this is a typical amenity that
a buyer of upper bracket homes looks for. He stated that the driveway width variation is
necessary to provide the proper driveway dimension for the three -car garages.
The Zoning Board of App
that the rezoning was apps
of the R-1 standard, and %
with sizes of homes in the
Chairman Basnik then asked f
Family District. Mr. Brettrage�
rezoning to an R-1 District. T
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brett
NAYS: Noni
Chairman Basnik then asked fc
three -car garages. MT. Saviaw
Appeals recommend approval
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brett
NAYS: Nont
Mr. Basnik then asked for a mo
out that the staff report indicat
line, and Chairman Basnik asl
McKone stated that this drivem
Mr. Brettrager moved that the:
wide driveway at the garage op
was seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brett
NAYS: N
These recommendations will t
L -59-Z-92, ZBA-60-SU-92, ZBA-61-V-92
e3
liscussed the request, and it was determined
i in that the two lot sizes would be in excess
:ruction of a home that would be compatible
not have any adverse impact.
the rezoning from an R -X to an R-1 Single
e Zoning Board recommend approval of the
seconded by Mr. Saviano.
Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
he request for a Special Use Permit to allow
ded by Mr. Pratt, that the Zoning Board of
Jse Permit to allow three -car garages.
Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
a,. on theati
driveway width variation. Mrs. Skowron pointed
that the dneway should taper to 21 feet at the property
if the pet loner was agreeable to this condition. Mr.
taper was agreeable with him.
,iing Board of Appeals recommend approval of a 30 foot
ng, tapering to 21 feet at the property line. The motion
er, Saviand, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
irwarded tor: the Village Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN KK
FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
DATE: AUGUST 19, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-59-Z-92; 60 -SU -92; 61-V.92
APPLICANT: LARRY MCKONE
ADDRESS: 805 EDGEWOOD LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: Current: R -X Single -Family; Proposed: R-1 Single -
Family
LOT SIZE: Current: 22,148.00; Proposed: 11,574.04 each
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A-%: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
4. Additional Comments: Building Permits required prior to any construction
Enzineed=
1. Subdivision/Consolidation: There is an existing 10' rear yard easement which is not
shown. Existing subdivision plat also shows a 50' front. Rezoning may change the
front yard setback.
2. Sanitary Sewers: There is an 8" sanitary sewer on the east side of the street.
3. Surface Drainage: There are no storm sewers in the area. The wider drive and 3 -
car garage cause more impervious surface and increase the run-off rate.
4. Water Supply: There is a 6" water main on the west side of the street. Existing
water service for house if not to be used shall be capped at the main.
5. Any Additional Comments: All development code requirements (i.e. storm street
lights, etc.) will be imposed on this subdivision.
S1MMAff&ECSSM XEND&UON
It is the opinion of the Planning Staff that the proposed rezoning from "R -X" Single -Family
to "R-1" Single -Family at 805 Edgewood ULne be considered for approval. While all the
properties on Edgewood are the large lot R -X classification, this rezoning and subdivision
provide lots in excess of 11,500 sq. ft. This lot size is sufficient to allow construction of
homes that will be consistent with the character of this area. Also, staff would recommend
approval of Special Use Permits with variations to allow the subsequent two lots to be
improved with 3 -car garages and driveway widths that do not exceed a maximum of 30' in
front of the garage and are a maximum of 21' at the property line. All outstanding issues
and concerns of the Building and Engineering Department shall be addressed and resolved
prior to the issuance of any building permits.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER vin -1
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-63.V.92, NATHAN AND BARBARA GREENBERG
1028 SOUTH BEECHWOOD DRIVE
DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION
Varialion Request;
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Barbara and Nathan Greenberg. The applicants are
requesting variations to allow a 27 foot wide driveway and subsequent increased front yard
lot coverage of 40%.
The Zoning Board considered the request at the meeting of September 24, 1992. At the
meeting, Mr. Greenberg indicated that the wider driveway is necessary to accommodate the
family automobiles due to the ban on on -street parking. Mr. Greenberg also noted that
there are two handicapped persons in the family and the additional driveway will be
beneficial in backing out for his wife.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report and noted that Mrs. Greenberg is
permanently handicapped and it is difficult for her to turn her head. He also added that
there are many 21 foot driveways in the area, but none appear to be as wide as the request.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. It was noted that a letter
of support was received from the next door neighbor. By a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board
recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 27 ft. wide driveway and a 40%
front yard lot coverage at 1028 South Beechwood.
Development Code Modification:
The owner of this property is requesting a Development Code modification in order to
permit the construction of a 27 foot wide driveway apron. The apron at the curb shall be
no greater than 30 feet in width. The applicant's current driveway is approximately 18 feet
wide and serves a two -car garage. Recently, he has purchased a third car and would like
to park it on the left side of the driveway. The owners have noted that Mrs. Greenberg is
handicapped with neck and back problems. She does drive one of the vehicles but has a
problem turning in the driver's seat to see behind the car. The applicant feels that a straight
27 foot driveway would considerably help her in moving in and out of the driveway and
garage. Mrs. Greenberg is permanently disabled. The additional width of the driveway
would allow the household to utilize their three cars without jockeying cars in and out of
the driveway.
The Plan Commission met in regular session on September 16, 1992 and voted 5-0 in favor
of recommending approval of the applicant's request. Staff had no objections to this
Development Code modification.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 63-V-92 Hearing Date: September 24, 1992
PETITIONER: Nathan & Barbara Greenberg
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1028 S. Beechwood Drive
PUBLICATION DATE: September 8, 1992
REQUEST: The following variations are needed in order
to widen an existing driveway: 1.) A variation
from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway with
a maximum width of 27 feet instead of the
allowed 21 ft. 2.) A variation from Section
14.1102.A to allow the front yard lot coverage
to be 40% instead of the maximum allowed
35%.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this item as a variation request at 1028 South Beechwood
Drive to allow a maximum driveway width of 27 feet rather than 21 feet, and a front yard
coverage of 40% rather than the maximum 35%.
Mr. Greenberg introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that the wider
driveway is necessary to accommodate the automobiles in the family. He stated that Mount
Prospect does not allow any on -street parking and that with three drivers in the family there
is a constant need for maneuvering cars in and out of the driveway. Further, Mr. Greenberg
noted that there are two handicapped persons in the family, and that the wider driveway
is necessary for maneuvering and backing out, particularly for his wife who has a fused neck.
He stated that she cannot turn her head properly and that a wider driveway straight back
to the street would accommodate this hardship of his wife.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the request for the Zoning Board of Appeals. He
stated the petitioners seek to widen their 18 foot driveway to 27 feet, and noted that the
ZBA-63-V-92
Page 2
application includes an indication that Mrs. Greenberg is handicapped. Mr. Forsythe noted
that there are many driveways in the area that are 21 feet wide, but none appear to be as
wide as the 27 foot requested by I he petitioners. He also noted that the Plan Commission
had reviewed and approved their request for ,a wider driveway apron in the parkway;.
No one appeared to speak in fay r or in opposition to the request.
Mr. Basnik asked if the drivcould be tapered to 21 feet at the property line as had
been done with other requests;;; nd Mr. Greenberg emphasized that for the purpose of
accommodating his wife and her difficultydin turning her head, that it is easier to back
straight out rather than to maoe ver the car in The driveway.
Mr. Cassidy made note of a "icier of support from the property owner at 1100 South
Beechwood.
The Zoning Board generally di" ed the request and it was determined that,a hardship
existed in terms of the handicap of Mrs. Greenberg, and how the 27 foot driveway would
not adversely affect the neighbor oo.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion. Mr. Saviano
moved, seconded by Mr. Pratt, ,�ihat the Zoaing; Board of Appeals approve a variation to
allow a 27 foot driveway and a `; % front yard coverage at 1028 South Beechwood.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon; Skowron, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion carried by a vote of1,4 This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-63-V-92
APPLICANT: NATHAN AND BARBARA GREENBERG
ADDRESS: 1028 SOUTH BEECHWOOD DRIVE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
FAR.:
R-1 Single Family Residential
8,497.50
(Current) 37.46%; (Proposed) 39%
Front yard: (current) 31% (proposed) 4017v
N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQ=
The following variations are needed in order to widen an existing driveway:
1. A variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway with a maximum width of 27
feet instead of the allowed 21 ft.
2. A variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow the front yard lot coverage to be 40%
instead of the maximum allowed 35%.
PIANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS AND CONCERNS
Summary of application: The petitioners are seeking to widen their 18 ft. driveway to 27
feet. The application indicates that the current off-street parking ban prohibits overnight
parking on the street. Also indicated is that Mrs. Greenberg is handicapped, and the
additional space is requested to allow an easier access to and from their automobiles.
Attached to the staff report is a letter from Mr. Greenberg regarding the variation request,
as well as a letter from the neighbor supporting the request.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The applicants have stated that there is a handicapped
driver in their household, and it has been indicated that an elderly parent with disabilities
as well as a young driver also live in the home. The additional parking area is requested
for ease into and out of the driveway as well as parking for family vehicles. A review of the
block finds many driveways at approximately 21 feet, but none seem as wide as the 27 foot,
three -car width requested by the petitioner.
The wider driveway will increase the front yard lot coverage from the current 31% to 40%.
Wider driveways are not an uncommon request in Mount Prospect due to the limited
driveway widths and the on -street parking ban. There should be a negligible increase in
stormwater run-off from the wider drive, and no adverse impact on the area.
OTHER DIE l: COMMENTS
It has been indicated that a variation from the Development Code is required in order to
widen the approach. The petitioners have been scheduled to be heard by the Plan
Commission at their September 16 meeting.
The Engineering Division indicates that the existing curb is a valley -type gutter and it will
not be necessary to change it to accommodate the wider approach. No concerns about
stormwater run-off were made.
The Police Department indicates support of any attempt to move cars off the street.
Inspection Services has indicated that the existing drainage should not be altered, and also
suggested that the driveway be tapered to 21 feet at the sidewalk and keep the approach at
21 feet.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
In order to accommodate three vehicles, handicapped residents and the on -street parking
ban of the Village, the petitioners are seeking to widen their drive to 27 feet. The driveway
will be 27 feet at the property line and will need separate approval from the Plan
Commission for the approach.
Staff believes that the petitioners have proved a hardship and would recommend approval
of the variations for a 27 foot wide driveway and a 40% front yard lot coverage.
RPF:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-66-SU-92, ZBA-67-V-92, SATWANT & IQBAL SINGH
LOCATION: 1430 WEST BONITA AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Satwant & Iqbal Singh. The applicants are requesting a Special Use
Permit to allow a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles and variations to
allow a 26'-8" wide driveway and an overall lot coverage of 48%.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 24,
1992. At the meeting, Satwant Singh indicated his desire to include a three -car garage with
the new home he is constructing. He added that all the existing homes on Bonita in this
subdivision have three -car garages.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, summarized the staff report and indicated that many of the lots in
this area have three -car garages and the proposed home is in character with those existing
houses.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was indicated to Mr. Singh that no
further additions or structures would be allowed without further lot coverage variations. By
a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the Special Use Permit
and variations to allow a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles, a 26'-
8" driveway and 48% lot coverage.
DMC:hg
T,."
fRcPERTr LAV
G7RTh'
/Nr�Ga�` 5L16/MI ENT
i
�.
Ul
wp
•o ' sET SAC k
0
CC
r
FiiChwr„�
w
In
a.
301.Ll/G7r.L/NE
.
!o PU,BUG UT/L/77
-75•ao'
QRµ
F3'0Ni 7A A VEIVUf
s
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 66 -SU -92; ZBA-67-V-92 Hearing Date: September 24, 1992
PETITIONER:
Satwant & Zqbal Singh
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1430 West Bonita Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 8, 1992
REQUEST:
The Petitioners are seeking the following in
order to allow the construction of a three -car
garage with the construction of a new home:
1.) A Special Use as required in Section
14.1101.C.8 to allow a garage designed to house
more than two motor vehicles. 2.) A variation
from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a driveway
width of 26'-8" instead of the maximum allowed
21 feet. 3.) A variation from Section 14.1102.13
to allow a total lot coverage of 48% instead of -
the maximum allowed 45%.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Michaele Sk6wron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next case being an application filed to allow a Special
Use for a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles for a home at 1430 West
Bonita, and a variation of the driveway width to allow a 26'-8" driveway, and a front yard
coverage of 48% rather than 45%.
Mr. Singh introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated he is going to be
building a home at 1430 West Bonita. He explained that he is presently a resident in Mount
Prospect and has a two -car garage, but that he would like to include a three -car garage with
his new home. He noted that all of the other houses in this new subdivision on West Bonita
have three -car garages, and that this request is necessary to allow him to have the same
feature.
Chairman Basnik then noted that the driveway width variation is necessary to accommodate
the three -car garage, and that this increased driveway width leads to the variation in the
required front yard. Mr. Basnik also noted that he is aware that all of the other houses in
this subdivision have three -car garages.
Z113A-66-SU-92, ZBA-67-V-92
Page 2
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff feport for the Zoning Board of Appeals and
indicated that the petitioners: hope to construct a three-car garage with a wider driveway at
their new home, and that this bads to the increased lot coverage. Mr. Forsythe" stated that
this subdivision has a number, three car garages that were allowed with earlier Special
Use Permits and that this request is similar to existing conditions in the neighborhood. He
also noted all the required setbacks had been met, and that staff had no objections to the
request. Mr. Forsythe also pouted out that`the owners of the lot at 1218 West Glen Lane
had submitted a letter in support of the petitioner's request.
Chairman Basnik ++then asked %f'�comments from the Zoning Board. Mr. Cassidy noted that
there are number of other three/ garages on West Bonita, and Mrs. Skowron pointed out
that, while she supports the req#est, this does lead to a higher lot coverage, and asked the
petitioner if there were any plates to construct any additional decks, sheds or patios on the
property. Mr. Singh stated hedad no plansto do any more construction.
Mr. Saviano asked Mr. Singh ifIe was acting as the general contractor on this request, and
Mr. Singh stated that he was th, general contractor.
Mr. Brettrager also indicated ttfe concern for any additional lot coverage at this location,
and Mr. Lannon stated that anynew construction on the lot would require a variation that
could be considered at that tnY.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and found that it was similar to existing
conditions in the neighborhood'r and Chairman Basnik asked for a. motion on the Special
Use for a garage designed to h6se more than two motor vehicles. Mr. Lannon moved that
the Zoning' Board recommend approval ofithis ;garage designed to house more than two
motor vehicles. The motion was seconded ly Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Break, er, Lanncfn, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None;;
The motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Chairman Basnik then asked fcjr a motiono:on the variation requests to allow the wider
driveway and the increased oyerl11 lot coverage, and Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning
Board of Appeals recommend approval ofa z6'-8" driveway and a <48% lot coverage. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Cssidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, I.annoa, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion carried by a vote of 7-0. These recommendations will be forwarded to the
Village Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT.
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNER
SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
ZBA-66-SU-92, ZBA-67-V-92
SATWANT & ZBGAL SINGH
1430 WEST BONITA AVENUE
119
O ID
12,3
$0NrA AV
1419
135
I"
Um
129 130
t31
31 132
133 134
+35 . T.
cuvvi AV
207 208
209 210
213 300
302
304
306
21 '0
'0
'0 0
2
4
306
308
310
-3;12
314
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 11,250 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: (Proposed) 48%
F -A -R. : .35
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQ=
The petitioners are seeking the following in order to allow a three -car garage with the
construction of a new home:
1. A Special Use as required in Section 14.1101.C.8 to allow a garage designed to house
more than two motor vehicles.
2. A variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 26'-8" instead of
the maximum allowed 21 feet.
3. A variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow a total lot coverage of 48% instead of
the maximum allowed 45%.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS AND QQNCERNS
Summary of application: The petitioners have indicated their desire to construct a three -
car garage and wider driveway to the new home they are going to build on the vacant lot
at 1430 West Bonita. Subsequently, the wider driveway and larger garage create a lot
coverage of 48% instead of the maximum allowed 45%. The application indicates that the
subdivision currently contains many three -car garages and an additional three -car garage will
not be a detriment to the area.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioner has requested a Special Use Permit with
variations in order to allow a three -car garage to be built on the vacant property at 1430
West Bonita. This subdivision has had several Special Use Permits with variations granted
to allow similar three -car garages. The garage is designed as a side load and the driveway
is situated such that it tapers to 12 feet in the front yard and no front yard lot coverage
variation is required. The property in question is a large "R-1" Single Family lot of 11,250
square feet. This area of Mount Prospect has had many new homes built in the past several
years which are large in nature. This home which has been proposed for this particular lot
has a floor area ratio of .35 which is the maximum allowed. No future room additions will
be allowed without a variation. The ordinance allows a maximum 45% lot coverage. The
proposed home with three -car garage indicates a total lot coverage of 48%. All the required
setbacks have been met and the required grading and drainage plan has been approved with
the building permit.
It has been also indicated is that there is a fire hydrant and light pole on the right-of-way
which will need to be located so that there is no conflict with the driveway.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
Staff has no objection to the request as the petitioners have done a good job of minimizing
the front yard lot coverage by tapering the driveway to 12 feet. This area has many three -
car garages and the proposed house will be similar to those already constructed. Staff would
like to remind the petitioner that no further lot coverage or room additions will be allowed
on this lot without further variations.
RPF:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM; DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 29, 1992
SUBJECT. RAY NAEGELE, 2016 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION - SIDEWALKS
The owner of the property is asking permission not to install the required public sidewalk
on Euclid Avenue. Mr. Naegele will be constructing a video store on this lot. The 0.409
acre, 17,816 square foot vacant site is zoned B-4 and is bordered to the west and north by
single family residential homes. Mount Prospect Auto Sales Company is adjacent to the site
to the east. There are no sidewalks adjacent to the site, but staff would note that the Mount
Prospect Auto Sales lot to the east is almost entirely paved, and a fairly new sidewalk has
been constructed between it and Chinkapin Oak Drive on the west side of River Road. It
should also be noted that River Trails Park District Burning Bush Park is located
approximately 400 feet to the west of the site. Although there are no sidewalks on the north
side of Euclid Avenue between the site west to Burning Bush, staff believes that a sidewalk
should be installed in order to provide pedestrian linkage and pedestrian -vehicular
separation on the site.
The Plan Commission voted 7-0 in favor of approving the applicant's request, but made their
vote contingent upon the owner signing a restrictive covenant guaranteeing the installation
of the sidewalk when requested by the Village. This condition was agreeable to the owner.
Staffs recommendation is to have the sidewalk installed.
MES:hg
#t rr• rsr
- 1, ire r1 rr
two
! tw r. rr {sf4+7t w.+a+t wrlw sz::: •tea .. �_#1r
• rpsMa,-+�-
��
jrt I m
*.hr
: i
C
4
t f•!• F
•.ism ' ♦
r,tt.
� pst�
•y(
fi}fat w+ta
f.it
��
jrt I m
*.hr
: i
C
4
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
P3
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 2, 1992
SUBJECT: ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21
FORFEITURE OF BOND MONIES
As part of the normal building and development process, the Village requires that
contractors put up with the Village certain cash Bonds which are required in order to
ensure that projects are completed in a workmanlike manner or to protect against
damage to public property. These Bonds are normally refunded upon final inspection
and approval of the particular project.
While many of the Bonds are returned, the Village has, over the years, accumulated
literally thousands of dollars in unclaimed deposits for projects, some that were
undertaken many years ago. Without a formalized procedure for forfeiting those monies,
the Village must simply maintain them in its Trust Fund. After research by Mr. Jepson
and consultation with Village attorneys, it was determined that the Village could, upon
proper notice and a reasonable waiting period, declare the monies forfeited thereby
enabling the Village to transfer said funds to the Village's General Fund.
It is estimated that approximately $100,000 in unclaimed Bond money could be
transferred this fiscal year if the forfeiture procedure is put into place, This item was
discussed in conjunction with the ongoing review of the Village's Building and Fire/Safety
Codes. At that time, the Board gave its approval to the concept.
Due to the fact that the review of the Code is proceeding at a slower pace than
anticipated, staff would respectfully request consideration of adoption of this Ordinance
separate and apart from the review of the balance of the Building Code so that we may
take advantage of this potential revenue source.
MIC4.NIS
MEJ/rcc
c: Finance Director David Jepson
Inspection Services Director Chuck Bencic
CAF/
10/1/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V OF
CHAPTER 21 ENTITLED "BUILDING CODE" OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Article V entitled "FEES, BONDS AND DEPOSITS"
Chapter 21, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto
Section 21.522 entitled "Refund of Deposits"; so that hereinafter
said Article V of Chapter 21 shall include the following:
Sec. 14.522. Refund of Deposits.
A. Upon final approval by the Village of each project and
upon conclusion of each guarantee period the Director of
Inspection services shall notify the permittee in writing
of any deposit balance remaining. Upon such notification
it shall be the responsibility of the permittee to apply
for the refund of such deposit balances on forms provided
by the Director of Inspection Services.
B. If an application for a refund of any deposit balance is
not received by the Director of Inspection Services
within six (6) months after written notification to the
permittee such deposit balance shall be forfeited to the
Village and said deposit balance shall be deposited in
the General Fund of the Village. 11
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
W
1992.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7M CM USA
TO: Village Manager.
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 1, 1992
SUBJECT: Sealed Bids for 50' Telescopic
Aerial Lift
Sealed bids were
opened on September 30, 1992
at 10 A.M. for the
proposed purchase
of a 501 telescopic aerial
lift. Six
invita-
tional bids were
sent out plus advertised as
required
by law.
The following bids
were received:
Bidder
Make/Model
Amount
ITEC
Versalift VN50MHI
$43,917
(w/trade-in)
Power Equipment
Elliot EC1350
$59,546
(w/trade-in)
Elliot Equipment
Elliot EC1350
$68,310
(no trade-in)
Bids were opened for this telescopic aerial device and the appro-
priate truck chassis (by separate bid). The bids as submitted
above are for the installation of the crane on the truck chassis
that the Village will purchase. There will be a 161 flat bed body
on this unit. As noted during the budget hearings, this combined
unit is projected to replace an existing 1983 Ford utility truck
with 54,000 miles. The purchase price of this unit in 1983 was
$14,573 and as of this date maintenance costs have been $13,507.
In the last year, the cost per mile has increased to $0.876/mile
to operate the vehicle. This is in comparison to life to date
operating cost of $0.415/mile to operate. As the cost per mile
averages show, the cost to operate this vehicle has increased
substantially in the past year.
This 1983 Ford utility truck was originally purchased with the
intention of stocking electric and motor parts primarily for the
maintenance of Village wells and high -service pumps in the well
houses. In the last few years, with the acquisition of Lake
Michigan water, our wells are primarily on stand-by duty, with
minimal wear and tear on the components. There is maintenance
on the pumping stations and high -service pumps in the well hous-
es which is still part of our obligation. However, street light
maintenance has increased substantially and we maintain all
those street lights that the Village installed. Street light
maintenance includes replacement of light heads and ballasts or
raising up an entire pole. Most of our poles, especially along
Northwest Highway, are 401 height and to use an articulated aeri-
al device is very awkward and inefficient. This new vehicle
would be able to increase our productivity on street light main-
tenance plus allow access to our roof -mounted HVAC systems on
Village -owned buildings.
The bid as submitted by ITEC on a Model VN50MHI should be dis-
qualified for the following reasons:
Boom is not a three -section telescoping boom. Boom is
two -section articulating. Mobility is limited in tight
areas.
Work Platform is 2411 x 4811 vs. 4011 x 60" requested. Does
not meet minimum size. Work platform capacity is 500 lbs.
maximum vs. 1000 lb. capacity requested. Does not meet
1000 lb. minimum capacity.
Lifting Capacit of 1000 lbs. with single -man bucket (two-
man bucket bid) vs. 1000 lb. capacity with two-man work
platform requested. Does not meet 1000 lb. minimum capaci-
ty.
Hydraulic Pump has an output of 8 gpm at 2000 psi vs. the
15 gpm at 2000 psi minimum capacity requested. Does not
meet minimum requirements.
The lifting capacity with an elevation of 750 is 1000 lbs
vs. the 3500 lb. minimum capacity requested. Does not meet
minimum capacity by more than 2000 lbs.
Funding for this unit is found on page 187 of the current budg-
et, account 48-077-93-8460, in the amount of $96,500. 1 recom-
mend acceptance of the lowest qualified bid as submitted by
Power Equipment on an Elliot Model EC1350 in an amount not to
exceed $59,546, which includes a trade-in allowance. Purchase
of this unit at the recommended cost of $59,546 and the recom-
mended purchase of a chassis at $36,209 totals $95,755, which is
less than the amount allocated in the budget.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
SOAERIAL.RES/FILES/BIDS
r.
I�
tt
r yq
w
"
8 y
77
•vM
�
} Rp
,��'Y7y'Wm„wMr
AL
r �
�• w,"" ' w. "
r .^�,",„"�"��, ^,•w
,,,�
bM yt ���p��y � ����' ,'y�mw�•»
” ".»..r:� .. M'. ,
,.
AiM°�
� �+ u
r Jv � ����"'✓..w.*.+'^
six.,
� '� II
TAw+rYIN�
}�
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM CM USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 1, 1992
SUBJECT: Bids for 35,000 lb. GVWR Truck
Cab and Chassis
Sealed bids were opened on September 30, 1992 for the proposed
purchase of a truck cab and chassis. This unit would have the
recommended 501 aerial device and flat bed body mounted on it after
delivery. Six invitational bids were sent out, and four bids were
received. Bid tabulations as follows:
Bidder
Make/model
Bid Price
Deliver
Freund Equipment
Int. 4900
$36,209.00
90 days
GMC Truck & Coach
TC7HO42
$36,357.75
60 days
Owen's International
Int. 4900
$37,750.00
75 days
Northwest Ford Truck
LN8000
$41,845.00
60-90 days
Funds for this proposed purchase are on page 187 of the current
budget, account #48-077-93-8460, in the amount of $96,500, which
also includes purchase of a 501 aerial device. I recommend accep-
tance of the lowest qualified bid as submitted by Freund Equipment
in the amount of $36,209. No trade-in was considered on the truck
chassis bid.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
35000—LB.RES/FILES/BIDS
w n.
y G
n
0
A
m n
rr � aY
w; n
n
Olt
4
✓ I'• �,"u�.� •� � fie" ,��f�
d
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER MICHAEL E. JANONIS tlV-,)(L
FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO L--
t5o.
DATE: SEPTEMBER 25, 1992 10/
SUBJECT: SELF CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS
Sealed bids were opened on August 25, 1992, at 10:00 a.m. for the
proposed purchase of five (5) MSA Self Contained Breathing
Apparatus with spare tanks and brackets. The bid results where as
follows:
BIDDER BID PRICE
JEFFERSON FIRE & SAFETY, Madison WI $14,807.00
AIR ONE, Schaumburg, IL $16,213.00
MSA, Elk Grove, IL $18,382.75
INTERSTATE OF MILWAUKEE, WI $18,442.00
On September 15, 1992, we received a letter from Jefferson Fire &
Safety withdrawing their low bid. Evidently MSA has an agreement
with its distributors that limits their ability to service and
support sales in specific geographical areas. I can only assume
that Jefferson was not aware of this when they bid our masks.
These SCEA's will continue to upgrade current stock. We have an
ongoing program within the fire department to replace five (5) of
our self contained breathing apparatus on an annual basis. This
allows an effective capital equipment replacement program and
avoids large replacement costs every 5 years.
Funds are available in the 92/93 Budget on Page 86, under Account
Code 1-042-02-8011. 1 recommend the purchase from the second low
bidder, Air One of Schaumburg, Illinois.
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
EMC/mah
QUALITY SINCE 1916
TEL.: 608 255-0068
411111"!
AKRON BRASS CO.
TEMPEST TECHNOLOGY
WALTER KIDDE CO.
MORNING PRIDE MFG.
FEDERAL SIGNAL CORP.
DETEX WATCHCLOCK SYSTEMS
WHELEN LIGHTS
PROFESSIOI�
SPECIALISTS
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES CO.
BADGER FIRE EXTINGUISHERS
V. H. BLACKINTON BADGES
ANGUS FIRE ARMOUR CO.
IMPERIAL FIREHOSE
STREAMUGHT, INC.
CAIRNS , BROTHERS
TASK FORCE TIPS
REPRESENTATIVE FOR GENERAL SAFETY EQUI
EN CORP. A CUSTOM FIRE APPARATUS
CUSTOM
825 EAST JOHNSON STREET MADISON, WISCONSIN 53703
September 9, 1992
Mount Prospect Fire Department
112 East Northwest Hwy
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
To Whom This Concerns:
We regret to inform you that we Jefferson Fire & Safety, Inc. of
Madison, Wisconsin must withdraw our bid dated August, 1992
for "breathing Apparatus". We apologize for great inconvenience
this has caused.
If you should have any questions or concerns please contact me at
your earliest convenience.
Again, we apologize for this inconvenience.
rne Af
Vice President
FIRE HOSE - FIRE HELMETS - FIRE COATS - FOAM LIQUID - KITCHEN & ENGINEERED SYSTEMS - FOG NOZZLES
AIR MASKS - FIREMEN'S EQUIPMENT - VEHICLE LIGHTS - SAFETY AND WASTE CANS - GAS MASKS - FIRE LADDERS
INTERIOR HOSE CABINETS & ACCESSORY EQUIPMENT - RECHARGES FOR ALL TYPES OF EXTINGUISHERS - FIRE PUMPS
JF90320
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TW Cm t
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: September 24, 1992
SUBJECT: 1992-93 Deicing Chemicals
c: Carol Fields
Dave Jepson
For many years, the village of Mount Prospect and most other
suburban communities "tag along" with the State of Illinois' bid
for rock salt to be used for ice control. The state then adds
up all these quantities, which then becomes a very lucrative con-
tract for salt companies to bid on. Consequent pricing is usual-
ly far better than if an individual community were to bid sepa-
rately. Following is a history of the dollars we have spent
over the past five years. Last year's budget was for $85,000
and as you will note, our total expenditure was $55,577.34.
Cost per
Tonnage
Year Ton
Delivered
Total Cost
91/92 $22.62
2,457
$55,577.34
90/91 21.12
2,715
57,340.80
89/90 21.69
3,239
70,253.91
88/89 23.83
2,966
70,679.78
87/88 18.83
3,112
58,598.96
1991-92 Data
Salt Vendor, AKZO (International
Salt Co.)
Quantity, 3,200 tons
(estimated)
Budgeted, $85,000
Starting inventory,
600 tons (estimated)
Initial fill order,
600 tons
1992-93 Data
Salt Vendor, North American Salt
Company
Quantity, 3,200
Budgeted, $83,000
Starting inventory,
550 tons (estimated)
Initial fill order,
600 tons
The budget has been reduced this year to $83,000; so at the new
bid price of $22,86 per ton, we would have enough money to pur-
chase 3,630 tons. The last few years have been light usage of
salt, but that is no guarantee that the forthcoming season will
be the same. Funds for purchase of salt come out of the MFT
funds and any money left over from one year stays in the MFT
fund for the following year's salt purchase, road repair, etc.
Fund allocations appear on page 140 of the current budget; ac-
count code no. 22-071-05-7387, in the amount of $75,000, and
account code no. 01-071-11-7318, in the amount of $8000. It
should be noted that a modest amount of money in these funds is
used for the purchase of liquid calcium chloride, which is added
to the rock salt during extremely cold weather to improve the
effectiveness of the salt.
I recommend that we waive the bidding process and accept the bid
of the State of Illinois to award the contract to North American
Salt Company for an estimated 3,200 tons of salt at a cost of
$73,152. Price of salt this year has increased by only by 240
per ton over last year's bid.
HLW/td
SALT_'92.93/FILES/STREETS
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: September 24, 1992
SUBJECT: Senior Center Boiler
c: Carol Fields
2-
��K
The Senior Center boiler has developed major leaks for the sec-
ond time since 1991. Because of the seriousness of these leaks,
the boiler is unsafe for the upcoming heating -season. Heating
contractors were called to locate the leaks, and we received
quotes from three contractors to replace the complete lower
section of the boiler. Prices quoted ranged from $4945 to
$5900, with a one-year guarantee on the repaired section only.
This boiler, which was in place when the Village purchased the
building, was the library's original boiler. The boiler tubes
were replaced in 1984.
As an alternate to a partial replacement, we also requested
quotes for a complete boiler replacement. A new boiler would
have an expected life of 30 years and would operate at 81% effi-
ciency. The current boiler operates at 30-60% efficiency.
The three quotes for complete boiler replacement are as follows:
Contractor Quote Make/Model
American Comfort Group $10,460 Weil -McLain LGB-8
National Heat and Power $10,580 Weil -McLain LGB-8
Ibbotson $10,900 Weil -McLain LGB-8
Due to the shortness of time before the heating season is upon
us, I request the Village Board waive the bidding procedure and
accept the quote received from American Comfort Group in the
amount of $10,460.
Funding for this purchase would come from HVAC Repairs Account
No. 01-071-02-6119 ($25,000), page 137 of the current budget.
6al, dA
Herbert L. Weeks
/td
SRCTR-BO.ILR/FILES/BUILDING
Mount Prospect Public Works Department 9
1; W, INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM T= Crry isA
TO: Village Manager c: Carol Fields
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: September 24, 1992
SUBJECT: Repair/Replacement
Approx. 201 of 24" Combination Sanitary/Storm Sewer
500 Block of South Hi-Lusi
We recently televised the combination sewer on South Hi-Lusi
Avenue. The cameras depicted approximately 201 of this 2411
combined sewer that was partially collapsed, and the video tapes
show approximately one-third to one-half of the pipe is choked
off and pieces of the are completely missing. Also, there is
evidence of dirt infiltrating into the sewer. This sewer is
about 151 to 17' deep and is located in the center of a concrete
street. Because of the depth and amount of sewer that needs to
be replaced, I have secured prices from four firms for immediate
repair as follows:
National Sewer & Water Inc. - $ 9,820
Glenbrook Excavating & Concrete, Inc. - 13,500
Rossetti Bros. Construction Co., Inc. - 19,250
Vian Construction Co., Inc. - 22,300
I recommend acceptance of the lowest quote as received from
National Sewer & Water, Inc. for an estimated cost of $9820.
A proposal for spot repair, such as this, would be very diffi-
cult to put into a formal bid. Thus, I request waiver of bids
on this project. It should be noted that National Sewer & Wa-
ter, Inc. is the contractor currently working on installation of
a new storm sewer on Can-Dota and Wa-Pella Avenue. His price is
very comparable to his original bid price an that project, and
we would realize a savings of $950 because he would not have to
move in any special equipment to do the job.
There is $80,000 allocated in the current budget for this type
of work. Line item is on page 165, account code 41-072-11-8001.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
HILUSISE.WER/FILES/SEWERS
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
SUBJECT: ELEVATED WATER TANK REHABILITATION PROJECT
Attached are a series of memos from Director of Public Works Herbert Weeks regarding
his proposal to begin preparation for the scheduled rehabilitation of the one million
gallon water storage tank located in the central business district. Also included for your
information is a 1991 update evaluation of the tank and a 1989 memo which identified
that the work being proposed here was anticipated.
Mr. Weeks is recommending that Tank Industry Consultants, Inc., Speedway, Indiana be
retained to begin preparation of bid specifications and contract documents, review bid
results and conduct miscellaneous laboratory testing and structural analysis in anticipation
of proceeding with rehabilitation next fiscal year. The amount of this initial work will
total $13,780. While an expenditure of this size would normally warrant that the work
be bid, I concur with Mr. Weeks that the firm in question, Tank Industry Consultants
(TIC), is a recognized leader in this field and has provided excellent services to the
Village in the past.
In 1989, the Village hired another firm to analyze the overall condition and life
expectancy of the elevated tank. The report issued by that firm was found to be lacking
in specificity and overall professionalism. As a result, the Village sought proposals from
various consulting firms with expertise in this area. Tank Industry Consultants was
retained at that time to provide a detailed report of the tank's condition. It was the
consensus of staff and the Board that the report issued by TIC was of superior quality
and made a series of recommendations regarding short and long-term repair. At that
time, the short-term repairs were undertaken and TIC indicated that the work done at
that time would defer major rehabilitation for a period of approximately five years.
At this time, it appears that the original report was accurate and that the long-range
repairs and painting identified in 1989 are now needed. The estimated cost of + $450,000
is in line with the figure identified in the 1991 update report.
The decision to proceed with the actual rehabilitation of the tank will, of course, depend
in part upon the Village's financial condition. However, this initial expenditure
recommended by Mr. Weeks is money well spent and puts us in a position to proceed
with the project if all conditions prove acceptable. If we do not proceed at this time,
the specifications and other documentation will remain valid and can be utilized at the
point we do decide to go forward. While the actual rehabilitation work will be bid out,
I would also at this point concur with Mr. Weeks' recommendation regarding the
retention of Tank Industry Consultants for resident inspection services.
With regard to funding for this project, staff will be presenting a proposal for an
alternate funding source as part of upcoming budget talks. The Village Board may wish
to consider this alternative.
MICHAEL t.AS SIS
MEJ/rcc
attachments
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO- Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
q'7-
DATE: September 11, 1992 IC)
SUBJECT: Elevated Water Tank
In 1989 and again in 1991, we contracted with Tank Industry
Consultants, Inc. to inspect our elevated tank and to provide us
with their recommendations, which would be necessary to bring
this tank up to current EPA and OSHA safety standards and recoat-
ing. We have, thus far, delayed any major maintenance work on
this tank because of the high estimated cost of the maintenance
and repair work needed. In this current year's budget, there is
money allocated for a consultant to draw up plans and specifica-
tions for the repair of this structure, consistent with previous
findings. It is my recommendation that a contract award be made
to have these plans and specifications done by Tank Industry
Consultants and have them available for bidding purposes very
early in 1993.
My opinion is that, if the Village would agree to include money
in the 1993-94 budget for this repair and maintenance, I can
schedule this work to start early in the spring of 1993. (Rough
estimates to do all the work as contemplated is in excess of
$450,000.) 1 received a firm quote from Tank Industry Consul-
tants, Inc. for preparation of detailed technical specifications
and for testing and observation work required for the bidding
phase. The fee to provide specifications and contract docu-
ments, including all drawings, plans and designs, is $9230.
Additionally, to have Tank Industry Consultants review the bids
received and to recommend the lowest responsible bidder would be
an additional $750. Additional sampling for lead contaminants
in the paint and for structural defects will be required. Lab
analysis and administration of this phase would be in an amount
not to exceed $3800.
It is my recommendation that the Village accept the proposal of
Tank Industry Consultants in a total amount not to exceed
$13,780. We realize that this is only a singular proposal.
However, considering this firm's reputation and knowledge of our
structure, it would be beneficial to the Village if this con-
tract is awarded to them. In the past they have saved other
municipalities thousands of dollars with their unbiased reports
and recommendations for cost and repairs. Tank Industry Consul-
tants, Inc. is not a contracting firm, nor do they sell paint or
FVJ
other materials. And because they are an independent third
party, project representation would be performed without antici-
pation to obtain a contract for painting, repair or materials.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/ td
MGR-ONEL.TNK/FILES/WATER
Mount Prospect Public Works Department 9
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM an US4
TO: village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: September 11, 1992
SUBJECT: Elevated Tank Maintenance Contract
By previous memo, I have requested waiver of bids and award of a con-
tract to Tank Industry Consultants, Inc. for preparing specifications
and bidding documents for the repair and upgrade of our elevated water
storage tank.
The following are some of the items which will be addressed:
Sandblast off all existing coatings
Paint Exterior
SP6, Epoxy -Polyurethane
Containment of Paint and Sandblast Material
Hazardous Disposal
Paint Interior
SPIO, Epoxy System
Install New Cathodic Protection System
Overhead Power Line Relocation
Misc. Pit Welding and Grinding
Seam Sealing
Overflow Pipe Modifications
Replace Freeze -Resistant Vent/Manhole
Replace Exterior Ladders
Provide Ladder Safe Climbing Devices
Conduit Relocation
Modify Balcony Safety Railing
Add Tower Ladder Platform Safety Chains
Add Balcony Floor Drain Holes
Replace Riser Safety Grate
Remove Drain Valve
Protective Pipe Covers
Misc. Repairs
Initial estimates are that the work described will cost in excess of
$450,000. After the bid award has been made, it is my recommendation
that we contract with Tank Industry Consultants, Inc. to provide resi-
dent inspection of all phases of the repairs. Tank Industry Consul-
tants, Inc. has given me a proposal where they are estimating the job
will take 10 to 12 weeks at a cost not to exceed $37,800. Attached is
a breakdown of their rate structure for their professional services.
1111"IMMIXE. W. WIM
HLW/td/attach.
MGR-ONEL.TNK/FILES/WATER -4-
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
Professional Services - Rate Structure
Long Term Resident Observation:
Technician (travel and on -job time) $42.00 per hour
Overtime Premium (over 40 hrs./week) $ 11.00 per hour
Minimum 32 hours per week
Per Diem $65.00 per day
Spot Observation:
Technician (travel and on -job time) $48.00 per hour
Per Diem $65.00 per observation
One Hour Senior Engineer time added to each observation
for dispatching and report analysis interpretation
Mileage: (per vehicle) - $0.30 per mile from Speedway, IN;
Houston, TX; Laurel, MD; Hauppauge, NY; or Orlando, FL,
whichever is closer.
Hourly Rates:
Operations Manager
S53.00/hour
Quality Assurance Manager
S53.00/hour
Technical Editor
$53.00/hour
Chief Technician NACE Certified
$56.00/hour
NACE Level III Certified Coating
Inspector (If Requested)
$53.00/hour
Engineer
$50.50/hour
Engineer - E.I.T.
$57.00/hour
Engineer - Registered
$65.00/hour
Senior Registered Engineer
$74.00/hour
Principal Engineer
$105.00/hour
(E. Crone Knoy, P.E.)
Clerical Administrative
$35.00/hour
Clerical
$28.00/hour
Reimbursable Expenses:
- Travel by public transportation at cost, plus 10%.
- Photographic documentation mounted and labeled - if
requested by Owner - $3.00 per photograph.
- All other reimbursable expenses at cost, plus 10%.
Subcontract Laboratory Analysis:
- Total Lead in Samples by
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy - $75.00/sample
- Leachable Lead in Samples by
Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure - $325.00/sample
6
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
yT/un ary tu
•• MEMORANDUM
TO: village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: November 13, 1989
SUBJECT: Tank Rehabilitation
Last spring, we hired Dixon Engineering Inc. for a structural
inspection and coating analysis of the exterior and interior of
our one million gallon elevated water storage tank. After re-
viewing their report, there were some discrepancies in it that I
felt were serious enough to warrant an objection to their recom-
mendation. Following a review by the Finance Commission of my
June 8, 1989 report, it was recommended to the Village Board
that another consulting engineering report would be helpful. On
October 11, 1989, a recommendation was made to your office to
award a contract to Tank Industry Consultants Inc. for an analy-
sis of this tank.
Tank Industry Consultants Inc. from Speedway, Indiana made this
inspection the latter part of October 1989 and copies of the re-
port are now available for review. I feel this report is very
comprehensive and deals with all aspects concerning this tank so
that a knowledgeable decision can be made. The photographs that
they furnished coincide with my knowledge of the interior and
exterior maintenance problems in that they clearly depict pit-
ting, and the consultant addresses these problems as maintenance
issues that can be resolved by welding.
After reviewing their report and summary, it is fairly clear
that the tank would not need painting in its entirety for four
years. However, they do address certain improvements, such as
replacing the cathodic protection system and other spot repairs,
which should be done earlier. The existing coating has been on
the tank for seven years and trying to match the paint on spot
repairs may be rather difficult due to fading, and we could be
looking at a tank with conceivably different shades of paint.
After further consultation with the consulting engineer, I would
recommend that the Village of Mount Prospect consider deferring
any repainting job for two years; then, at that time, empty the
tank for complete rehabilitation covering all aspects of their
recommendations to bring it into compliance with today's stan-
dards. Tank Industry Consultants feel that this would be a
17
logical conclusion and that, with the improvements made to the
tank as they recommended plus an accelerated maintenance pro-
gram, this tank could have a 75 -year life. The aesthetic appear-
ance of this structure may not be satisfactory to some residents
living in its shadow, but it would be structurally sound.
If the Village would decide to replace the tank, a proposed loca-
tion would be north of the current Public Works facility, and a
computer study indicates that that would be an ideal spot. To
leave the tank where it is and make the necessary repairs, reha-
bilitations and recoating would cost as follows:
Paint exterior, alkalide spot paint
and top coat
$ 65,000
Containment screening around exterior
tank during wash -off, spot blasting
and repainting
70,000
Paint interior using epoxy coating system
63,000
Replace cathodic system with a relatively
ice -free system similar to that supplied by
Harco Co.
10,000
on the east side of the tank, Commonwealth
Edison has some electric wires overhead
that should be placed underground
5,000 -
Replace air vent/manhole on top of tank with
a new freeze -resistant and larger design
5,000 -
Modify roof ladder to meet OSHA standards
2,500
Install ladder safety climbing devices on
exterior
5,000 -
Modify tower ladder rung spacing
2,500 -
Relocate electrical conduit
3,500'
Install tower ladder platform safety chains
500 -
Make improvements to the drainage area on the
balcony floor
1,500—
Modify the anode hand hole covers on the upper
section of the tank
1,000
Install a riser safety grate on the interior
of the tank
1,000'
V
Install a protective pipe cover 750�
Miscellaneous repairs such as spot welding,
exterior wash -down, etc. 6,000 -
Preparation of specifications and contract
documents 5,900..
Resident inspection of work, including
contract administration 18,500
Total Cost . . . . . . . . . . . $266,650
Tank Industry Consultants took a sample of the interior coating,
and preliminary findings are that there may be some lead content
present. These reports will not be known for another week or
so, but if lead is present in any magnitude, we may have to use
other, costlier procedures before recoating the interior. Fur-
ther, their recommendation includes regrading the land under-
neath the tank to provide for better drainage and to keep the
water away from the steel columns. This cost figure is not
available at this time. Dollars as stated represent 1989 costs
and the actual year of bid solicitation will affect these pric-
es.
If the Village were to agree with this recommendation, we should
have another inspection done in two years' time, prior to prepa-
ration of the specifications. It is projected that this type of
inspection would cost approximately $2500. If these procedures
are followed, we could expect a ten-year life out of the recoat-
ing job. N
In several sections of the report, the consultant commented
that, prior to bidding, an inspection should be made by a struc-
tural engineer of certain areas within the tank that are normal-
ly used for rigging. It is projected that this type of inspec-
tion would cost approximately $3000.
If replacement/relocation of the tank were considered, the con-
sultant estimates $200,000 for removal and $1,100,000 for re-
placement. The existing tank is 130 feet high, and a relocated
tank at the suggested location would be 120 feet in height due
to elevation differential.
The report as submitted by Tank Industry Consultants is very
clear and concise and appears to be complete.
ew, I
HLW/td
attach.
c: Finance director
7
S
y
TANK I,-\T)USf40 CULTANTS, INC.
4912 West 16th Street P.O. Box 24359 Telephone: 317 / 244-3221
Speedway. Indiana 46224 FAX: 317 / 4864708
October 4, 1991
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
Public Works Facility
1700 W. Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229
RE: Update Evaluation of a 1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water
Storage Tank Located at the corner of Northwest Highway and
Maple Street in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois.
TIC 91 -IL -960
Dear Mr. Weeks:
Please find enclosed three copies of the update evaluation report
for the 1,000,000 gallon radial cone tank at the corner of North-
west Highway and Maple Street in the Village of Mount Prospect,
Illinois.
Samples of the exterior and interior coating were sent to a labo-
ratory for analysis; however, the results will not be in until
the week of October 7. 1 will send a copy of the results to you
as soon as the results become available.
Please note that the economic factors section includes only those
work items which would be performed by the Contractor. The fol-
lowing costs would be associated with the tank rehabilitation
project:
Filing FAA form 7460-1.. ..... ...... $ 500
Preparation of Specifications and
Contract Documents.. *... 6,500
Resident Observation of Work g
Contract Administration(est) ...... 39,000
The above costs are estimated and are only included to aid you in
making budgetary decisions.
In addition, the cost estimate for TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS,
INC. to file an FAA form 7460-1 to determine the obstruction re-
quirements on this tank.was listed separate per your request on
b7urel, MD 3011880-4004 0 Houston, TX 7131789-0989 0 Hauppauge. NY 5161864-2507 o Orlando. FL 4071851.5745
Xr. Horb*rt L. Weeks Octobor 4, 1991 Pago 2
September 26, 1991. This cost would be for TANK INDUSTRY CON-
SULTANTS, INC. to perform only this task; however, if TANK INDUS-
TRY CONSULTANTS, INC. prepares specifications for this project
then the cost of filing the FAA form would be included with the
specification costs.
In addition to the Prebid and Update Evaluation Services offered
by TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC., we also prepare specifica-
tions for repainting and repair projects, offer contract adminis-
tration services, and have a team of highly qualified field tech-
nicians who monitor the contractor's work in process. If, based
on the recommendations contained in this Update Evaluation Re-
port, you decide to undertake a rehabilitation project on this
tank, we would appreciate the opportunity to prepare a written
quotation for our specification, contract administration, and
work in process observation services for you. Since we already
are very familiar with the deficiencies observed on your tank,
and repainting and repair operations recommended, our firm is
confident that our continued involvement with this project will
assure an economic, long-lasting, quality rehabilitation project
for the Village of Mount Prospect.
If you have any questions about the report, or if you would be
interested in learning more about other tank -related professional
engineering services offered by TIC, please contact me any time.
Thank you for the opportunity to be of service to you, and I look
forward to working with you and the Village of Mount Prospect
again in the future.
Sincerely yours,
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
Michael T. Crist, E.I.T
Engineer
Enclosures
11
TANK IVDU Tyx
q0CA TANTS, INC.
4911 We,, 11th Street P.O. Box 24359 Telephone: 317 / 244-3221
Speedway, Indiana 46224 FAX: 317 / 486-4708
October 4, 1991
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public works
Public Works Facility
1700 W. Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229
SUBJECT:
The subject of this report is the field evaluation of the 1,000,000
gallon elevated water storage tank at the corner of Northwest High-
way and Maple Street in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois.
The field evaluation was performed on September 26, 1991 by Jeffrey
A. Cannon, Michael T. Crist, E.I.T., and Victor L. Risch, P.E. of
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. This report will update the condi-
tion of the tank from the last evaluation which was performed by
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. on October 27, 1989.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this update evaluation and washout was to determine
any changes in the condition of the tank interior, exterior, foun-
dations and accessories since the time of the last evaluation. The
Purpose of this report is to present the findings of the evaluation
and to make recommendations for painting, repairs, corrosion pro-
tection, and maintenance.
The condition of the items not referred to in the OBSERVATIONS sec-
tion of this report appeared to be in approximately the same condi-
tion as they were at the time of the last evaluation, which was
conducted in 1989.
AUTHORIZATION:
This update evaluation, washout, disinfection, and report were au-
thorized by Village of Mount Prospect Purchase Order Number 42945
dated September 19, 1991.
I
13
Laurel. MD 3011880-4004 o Houston. TX 7131789-0989 0 Hauppauge, NY 5161864-2507 * Orlando, FL 4071851-5745
.7
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Page 2
Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
PHOTOGRAPHS:
Color photographs were taken of the tank interior and exterior and
are included as a part of this report.
SUMMARY:
The overall condition of this tank had not change significantly
since the evaluation performed in 1989. However, changes in indus-
try practice, coating technology, and environmental rules and regu-
lations have altered some of the original recommendations. These
modifications can be found in the RECOMMENDATIONS section of this
report. In brief summation, TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. recom-
mends that the tank be completely rehabilitated including interior
and exterior cleaning and painting, and performance of the safety,
sanitary, and operational repairs and modifications which were out-
lined in the October 27, 1989 report and restated or updated in
this report.
OBSERVATIONS:
The condition of the items not referred to in the OBSERVATIONS sec-
tion of this report appeared to be in approximately the same condi-
tion as they were at the time of the last evaluation.
Exterior: The tank appeared to be in nearly the same condition as
it was at the time of the last evaluation. However, it was noted
during the field evaluation that the police and fire station that
was located west of the tank in 1989 has been removed, and the lot
is now vacant. Grass clippings were found in most of the anchor
bolt chairs. The exterior coating condition was in nearly the same
condition as well; however, the areas of coating failure which were
observed in 1989 have experienced further deterioration. The top-
coat to primer adhesion was poor, but the primer to steel adhesion
was good. The overflow pipe discharge was covered with a protec-
tive screen; however, the screening has been broken and was not
adequate at the time of this evaluation. Standing water was ob-
served on the balcony at the time of this evaluation. An increase
in chalking and coating streaks was noted on the shell of the tank.
Six cathodic protection handhole covers were misaligned and could
allow the ingress of insects and precipitation into the tank. The
roof vent screen and roof vent neck were found to be in a much more
deteriorated state. Metal loss on the top of the vent neck and on
the vent screen had created several gaps in the vent screening.
The obstruction light adjacent to the roof vent was on at the time
of this evaluation; however, one of the light bulbs was not operat-
ing. The obstruction light was equipped with a photoelectric cell
which was located near the base of the tower ladder. The cell did
I
0
1,000#000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Page 3
Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
not face north. Coating thickness measurements were performed on
the tank exterior. The results are as follows:
4.5 mils to 6.0 mils
11.0 mils to 14.0 mils
8.0 mils to 9.0 mils,
4.0 mils to 6.5 mils
4.0 mils to 6.0 mils
4.5 mils to 7.0 mils
3.0 mils to 6.0 mils
Columns:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than 1%
Riser:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than 1%
Radial Girders:
Failure to Primer: less than 1%
Failure to Rust: approx. 5%
Shell:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than 1%
Roof:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than it
Interior: The riser opening in the bowl of the tank was not
equipped with a riser safety grate. It is the opinion of TANX IN-
DUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. that personnel should not access the inte-
rior of the tank unless they are tied off with safety lines. There
were isolated areas of significant number of calcium deposits on
the tank interior. These deposits typically indicate areas of
coating failure where the steel is being cathodically protected.
The coating appeared to have undergone more deterioration since the
last evaluation; however the deepest new active pitting observed
was approximately 1/16 in. Coating thickness measurements were
performed on the interior surfaces of the tank. The results are as
follows:
15
Coating Thickness:
Columns:
Spot Blasted:
Other Areas:
Riser:
Bowl:
Balcony:
Shell:
Roof:
Coating Failure:
4.5 mils to 6.0 mils
11.0 mils to 14.0 mils
8.0 mils to 9.0 mils,
4.0 mils to 6.5 mils
4.0 mils to 6.0 mils
4.5 mils to 7.0 mils
3.0 mils to 6.0 mils
Columns:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than 1%
Riser:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than 1%
Radial Girders:
Failure to Primer: less than 1%
Failure to Rust: approx. 5%
Shell:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than 1%
Roof:
Failure to Primer: negligible
Failure to Rust: less than it
Interior: The riser opening in the bowl of the tank was not
equipped with a riser safety grate. It is the opinion of TANX IN-
DUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. that personnel should not access the inte-
rior of the tank unless they are tied off with safety lines. There
were isolated areas of significant number of calcium deposits on
the tank interior. These deposits typically indicate areas of
coating failure where the steel is being cathodically protected.
The coating appeared to have undergone more deterioration since the
last evaluation; however the deepest new active pitting observed
was approximately 1/16 in. Coating thickness measurements were
performed on the interior surfaces of the tank. The results are as
follows:
15
Mi
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INCoating
Thickness:
Roof:
6.0 mils to
10.0
mils
Shell:
6.0 mils to
14.0
mils
Bowl:
6.0 mils to
14.0
mils
if
Riser;
9.0 mils to
14.0
mils
Coating Failure:
Roof:
Failure
to Primer:
negligible
Failure
to Rust:
less
than 1%
Shell:
Failure
to Primer:
negligible
Failure
to Rust:
approx. 3%
Bowl:
Failure
to Primer:
less
than 1%
Failure
to Rust: approx.
1%
Riser:
Failure
to Primer:
less
than 1%
Failure
to Rust: approx.
3%
RECOMMENDATIONS:
Page 4
91 -IL -960
The following recommendations made in the last report remain un-
changed and include:
1. foundation and grout repair
2. valve vault should be locked
3. miscellaneous bracket removal and grinding repairs
4. riser manhole gasket replacement
5. diagonal bracing and riser rod repair
6. replace the exterior ladders
7. protective chain installation on the ladder platform
8. modify the balcony safety railing
9. additional balcony drain holes
10. fix the revolving roof ladder
11. installation of a new freeze -resistant roof vent
12. obstruction light verification or removal
13. interior recoating with an epoxy coating system
14. miscellaneous seam welding and pit filling
15. spider rod removal
However, the following safety and sanitary repairs need to be ad-
dressed immediately:
1. repair or replace the cathodic protection hand hole
covers
2. properly screen the roof vent
3. properly screen the overflow pipe discharge
4. install a riser safety grate
S. install protective pipe covers.
/4
U
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Page 5
■ Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
The recommendations that have changed or been modified since the
October 27, 1989 report follow:
The first of these pertains to the exterior coating. In the 1989
report, TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. recommended that the ex-
terior be spot painted and topcoated. At that time this recom-
mendation would have been the best alternative due to the appar-
ent presence of lead in the coatings. By topcoating the tank in
1989, the Owner could have delayed the complete removal of the
coating until more efficient methods for removing lead-based
coatings became available. However, at this time TANK INDUSTRY
CONSULTANTS, INC. believes that contractors are better equipped
to deal with removing lead-based coatings. Therefore, a complete
coating removal and repaint with an epoxy -polyurethane coating
system is recommended. This type of coating should have a serv-
ice life of 15 to 20 years as opposed to an expected life of 5 to
7 for a topcoat.
The optimum long -life coating system presently available is an
epoxy -polyurethane coating system. If the tank is to be repaint-
ed, the exterior surfaces should be completely cleaned to the
equivalent of an SSPC-SP 6, Commercial Blast Cleaning and an
epoxy -polyurethane coating system applied. Care must be taken
during the application of this particular coating system because
this paint does have poor dry -fall characteristics, and potential
damage to the surrounding property must be taken into considera-
tion. The polyurethane paints also require close monitoring of
temperature and humidity during application. The polyurethanes
have excellent color and gloss retention and the longest expected
service life of any of the common exterior tank coatings. The
polyurethanes also have excellent resistance to condensation,
graffiti, and chipping. The typical life of a properly applied
epoxy -polyurethane coating system is approximately 15 to 20
years. These coatings are also manufactured to meet current VOC
requirements.
Prior to preparation of specifications for the cleaning and coat-
ing of the exterior of the tank, several samples of the exterior
coating system should be subjected to laboratory analysis to test
for ingredients which may at that time be subject to regulations
concerning their handling and disposal.
In addition to the exterior coating, TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS,
INC. strongly recommends that the removed coating debris be con-
tained and that the containment be used to minimize the exterior
coating overspray. The close proximity of the surrounding struc-
tures, parking lots, and roadways will cause an increase in reha-
bilitation costs.
11
17
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Page 6
Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
Because the exterior coating may contain lead pigments, TANK IN-
DUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. has included in the Economic Factors a
contingency for the disposal of hazardous material. The Owner
should be aware that this cost would only be required if the re-
moved coating debris is positively identified as a hazardous ma-
terial.
The overhead power lines adjacent to the tank site should be
relocated underground in order to !prevent potential electrical
shock to personnel working on the tank. The relocation of the
power lines should be performed in accordance with the National
Electric Code (NEC) guidelines.
Due to the close proximity of the trees, bushes, and other
landscaping, the Owner should anticipate a partial clearing of
the site to facilitate the tank rehabilitation. It is the
opinion of TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. that the clearing of
the tank site and landscaping of the site after the tank rehabil-
itation could be performed or contracted by the Owner in order to
save money on the tank rehabilitation.
The overflow screen was in need of repair and it is the experi-
ence of TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. that this type of screen-
ing traditionally requires continual maintenance. Therefore,
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. recommends that the overflow pipe
discharge be modified to use either a screened, counterweighted
flapgate or a vertically oriented screen.
Pertaining to the cathodic protection system, TANK INDUSTRY CON-
SULTANTS, INC. still recommends that an ice -resistant, year round
cathodic protection system using automatic potential and current
control be installed. However, the installation of the cathodic
protection system will not need to be performed until at least
after the first anniversary evaluation, and could possibly be
delayed 3 to 5 years. The reason for delaying the cathodic pro-
tection system installation is that the cathodic protection sys-
tem will not be required until isolated spot coating failures be-
gin to occur. Therefore, the installation of brackets, at the
time of the tank rehabilitation, for the future installation of
the cathodic protection system is recommended.
Information supplied by the Owner indicated that the gear and
shaft operated drain valve is not used, and instead a valve on
the discharge end of the drain line is used to drain the tank.
Therefore, TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. recommends that the
gear and shaft operated drain valve be removed from the base of
the riser, and a protective cover and silt stop be installed on
the drain line.
/r
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Peg* 7
Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
1
ECONOMIC FACTORS:
Life
Item
Cost
rears
Replacement of tank (1,000,000 gal.)
(at a new site) $ 1,275,000
75+
Remaining life of this tank:
With recommended maintenance
75+
With no maintenance or repairs
7
The following is a complete list of
repairs and
estimated costs
for their respective recommendations
found in the
RECOMMENDATION
section of this report.
IMMEDIATE
SANITARY AND
SCHEDULED
SAFETY
_AIRS
BAP
MAINTENANCE
Paint Exterior:
SP6, Epoxy -Polyurethane......
$ 125,000
Containment ..................
70,000
Contingency for Hazardous
Disposal ...................
75,000
Paint Interior:
SP10, Epoxy System...........
80,000
Provisions for Future Installation
of Cathodic Protection.....
2,000
Overhead Power Line Relocation.....
Misc. Pit Welding and Grinding.....
5,500
3,000
Seam Sealing.... ..........
3,000
Overflow Pipe Modifications........
1,000
■
Freeze -Resistant Vent/Manhole ......
4,500
■
Modify Roof Ladder .................
2,500 -
Replace Exterior Ladders...........
7,000
Ladder Safe Climbing Devices.......
5,500
Modify Tower Ladder Rung Spacing...
2,500'
Conduit Relocation...... .......
3,500
Modify Balcony Safety Railing......
7,500
Tower Ladder Platform Safety Chains
500
Balcony Floor Drain Holes..........
1,500
Anode Hand Hole Cover Repairs......
1,000—
Riser Safety Grate .................
1,000
Remove Drain Valve .................
1,000-
,000-Protective
ProtectivePipe Cover ..............
1,000
Misc. Repairs ......................
2,500
3,500
�
(Estimates are believed to be a
high average
of
bids which would be received in
1992.)
1
0
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Page 8
Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
Total Engineer's Recommendations: S_Apg,.gqq
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. has no control over the cost of
labor, materials, or equipment, or over the contractors' methods
of determining prices, or over competitive bidding, or the market
conditions. opinions of probable cost, as provided for herein,
are to be made on the basis of our experience and qualifications
and represent our best judgment as design professionals familiar
with the design, maintenance, and construction of concrete and
steel plate structures. However, TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or the con-
struction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost pre-
pared for the Owner.
The following economic factors include those work items which the
Engineer believes to be the minimum
to properly maintain this
tank from an operational standpoint. Other items related to
safety and risk management should be evaluated by the Owner.
ITEM
coo
Paint Exterior:
SP6, Epoxy -Polyurethane.....
$125,000
Containment ..................
70,000
Contingency for Hazardous
Disposal ...................
75,000
Paint Interior:
Splo, Epoxy System...........
80,000
Provisions for Future Installation
of Cathodic Protection.....
2,000
Overhead Power Line Relocation.....
Misc. Pit Welding and Grinding.....
5,500
3,000
Seam Sealing....... ...........
3,000
Overflow Pipe Modifications........
1,000
Freeze -Resistant Vent/Manhole ......
4,500''
Replace Exterior Ladders...........
7,000 -
Ladder Safe Climbing Devices.......
5,500"
Conduit Relocation .................
Modify Balcony Safety
3,500 --
Railing......
7,500 -
Tower Ladder Platform Safety Chains
500'
Balcony Floor Drain Holes..........
1,500'
Riser Safety Grate .................
1,000r
Remove Drain Valve .................
1,000`
Protective Pipe Covers .............
1,000.
Misc. Repairs ......................
5,000
Total Engineer's Recommendations: S_Apg,.gqq
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC. has no control over the cost of
labor, materials, or equipment, or over the contractors' methods
of determining prices, or over competitive bidding, or the market
conditions. opinions of probable cost, as provided for herein,
are to be made on the basis of our experience and qualifications
and represent our best judgment as design professionals familiar
with the design, maintenance, and construction of concrete and
steel plate structures. However, TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
cannot and does not guarantee that proposals, bids, or the con-
struction cost will not vary from opinions of probable cost pre-
pared for the Owner.
ru
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Page 9
Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
CLOSURE:
Brief Summation: The Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois has a
1,000,000 gallon welded steel elevated water storage tank which
appears to be in fair overall condition. The exterior and inte-
rior coating systems are in poor to fair condition and should re-
quire repainting within the next 1 to 2 years. The tank can
serve the community well for up to 75 years with proper mainte-
nance. Proper maintenance would include periodic washouts and
evaluations approximately every 2 or 3 years, and maintenance of
a new ice -resistant, year round cathodic protection system.
Contractor Selection: The work should be performed by a com-
petent bonded contractor, chosen from competitive bids taken on
complete yet concise specifications. The paints used should be
furnished by an experienced water tank paint manufacturer, sup-
plying the field service required for application of technical
coatings. All work done and coatings applied should be applied
in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendation, AWWA D100,
AWWA D102, NSF Standard 61 (latest revisions), and the Steel
Structures Painting Council.
Observation of Work: observation of the work in progress by ex-
perienced field technicians will offer additional assurance of
quality protective coating application. Observations can be per-
formed on a continuous basis or spot (critical phase) basis. The
actual cost of observation may be less using spot as opposed to
full-time resident observation; however, with spot observation it
is often necessary for work to be redone to comply with the spec-
ifications. This somewhat lowers the quality of the finished
product, lengthens the job, and is frequently a cause of conflict
between the contractor, Owner, and field observer. Resident
full-time observation minimizes the amount of "rework" required.
Warranty and Maintenance Evaluations: A warranty evaluation
should be conducted prior to the end of the one year bonded
guarantee. Washouts and paint, structural, sanitary, safety, and
corrosion evaluations should be conducted approximately every
three years.
Repair Time Frame: If the work is not performed within the next
12 months, it is recommended that the structure be reevaluated
prior to the preparation of specifications and solicitation of
bids.
Specifications and Bidding Documents: The recommendations in
this report are not intended to be specifications on which a con-
tractor can bid. Complete bidding documents must include general
and special conditions, detailed technical specifications, and
other information necessary for the competitive bidding process.
I at
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank Page 10
Mount Prospect, Illinois 91 -IL -960
In order to properly protect the interests of the Owner, Contrac-
tor, and Engineer; the initial evaluation, the technical specifi-
cations, legal portions of the contract documents, and the field
observation should be performed by the same firm or with close
coordination of all parties involved.
Hazardous Material in Coatings: The coatings on the interior and
exterior surfaces of this tank appear to contain lead pigments.
It should be taken into consideration that Federal, State, and
local environmental agencies have placed stricter controls on the
removal of lead-based paints from steel structures by the use of
conventional abrasive blasting techniques. The paint and blast
residue may be considered to be hazardous waste depending on the
concentration of lead or other particles in the residue. Worker
health and safety rules should be rigidly adhered to during the
prosecution of this work.
Limitations of Evaluation: It is believed that the conditions
reported herein reflect the condition of the tank as observed on
the date of the evaluation, using reasonable care in making the
observations, and safety in gaining access to the tank. Should
If latent defects be discovered during the coating removal and
cleaning of the structure, they should be brought to the atten-
tion of the owner and the field observer. No evaluations were
19 made of the original design or the quality of the original con-
struction of the tank.
seismic Loadings: This tank is located in a zone 0 (AWWA)
earthquake region. This evaluation and the reporting of the con-
dition of this tank do not warrant the structural condition of
the tank or any of the original design for seismic loadings.
Likewise, recommendations for this tank do not include modifica-
tions which may be required for compliance with present struc-
tural codes.
I
�A
0
1,000,000 Gallon Elevated Water Tank
Mount Prospect, Illinois
F
Page 11
91 -IL -960
If there are any questions concerning this report, please feel
free to contact the writers.
Respectfully submitted,
,tKNO
TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
06.2-0395146
It
E V'i�'l Et E R Michael T. Crist, E.I.T.
--' '
OF Engineer
ON
E. Crone Knoy, E.
Chief Executive Officer
Copyright 0 1991 TANK INDUSTRY CONSULTANTS, INC.
All Rights Reserved
MTPR0960.lw9
13
TANK IVDUfiqo
--j TANTS, INC.
4912 West 16th Street P.O. Box 24359 Telephone: 317 / 244-3221
Speedway, Indiana 46224 FAX: 317 / 486-4708
CLASSIFICATION OF ADHESION TEST RESULTS
METHOD A - X -CUT TAPE TEST
Description
Surface
Classification
No peeling or removal.
I X
5
Trace peeling or removal along incisions.
4
Jagged removal along incisions up to 1/16 in.
3
(1.6mm) on either side.
Jagged removal along most of incisions up to 1/8 in.
2
(3.2mm) on either side.
Removal from most of the area of the X under the
1
tape.
Removal beyond the area of the X
0
I ne example Illustrated shows two cuts approximately 1.5 in. tong that intersect near
their middle with an angle of between 300 and 45°.
laaral. Ul) .30l/RR0 4004 • Houston. YX 7131789-0989 . HaUDDaU901. NY 5161864-2507 • Orlando. FL 40 71851-5 745 °AY
7
TANK IVDU 40 TLTANTS, INC.
Y
4912 West 16th Street P.O. Box 24359 Telephone: 317 / 244-3221
Speedway, Indiana 46224 FAX: 317 / 486-4708
CLASSIFICATION OF ADHESION TEST RESULTS
METHOD B - CUT TAPE TEST
Description
Surface
Classification
The edges of the cuts are completely smooth;
No
5
none of the squares of the lattice are detached.
Failure
Small flakes of the coating are detached at
4
intersections; less than 5% of the lattice is
affected.
Small flakes of the coating are detached along
3
edges and at intersections of cuts. The area
affected is 5% to 15% of the lattice.
The coating has flaked along the edges and on
2
parts of the squares. The area affected is 15%
to 35% of the lattice.
The coating has flaked along the edges of cuts
I
in large ribbons and whole squares have detached.
The area affected is 35% to 65% of the lattice.
Flaking and detachment worse than grade 1
0
The example illustrated shows six parallel cut lines of 2mm. The Imm cutter will
also give six parallel cut lines of Imm spacing.
f--1 un milRRn-intu * 14—min. 7X 7131789-0989 * AFV CIA1944 ICA'Y . rr eA7/OCI
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
-m "
- 101 4.
To: Michael Janonis, Village Manager �
FROM: Chuck Benoic, Director of Inspection Services
DATE: September 22, 1892
RE: PATE SUBDIVISION
As part of the approval of Pate's subdivision' several agreements
were worked out. The agreements had to do with variations for
public improvements such as reduced street widths, waiver of off-
site improvements, village share of cost for some off-site
improvements and recapture agreements for some off-site street work
and water mains.
As part of the agreement, the Village was to pay for certain off-
site road improvements. He were to pay for the improvements to the
easterly 382 L.F. of WilU*ood plus the storm sewer and engineering
cost for this area. The Developer was to rebate the village an
amount based on the coat savings due to variations granted for
reduction in pavement width and elimination of a street light.
Preliminary cost estimates were the village share of road
construction including storm sewer would be about $39'000 plus
$3.900 to $5.850 engineering costs. The Developer's rebate to the
villege was estimated at $11'800.
Ordinance 4193 relates to the Pate's Subdivision. Section One,
Item A relates to the *11'800 Pate will pay the Village. Section
One, Item C states pate will install the street but does not
mention that the Village will pay for a share of the costs.
Three invoices have previously been submitted for this project.
one invoice was for the roadwork and one for storm sewer for a
total of $27.637 + $1'825 = $29'522. Along with the storm sewer
was a cost for the six sanitary sewer services installed at Village
request. These services were installed because the sanitary sewer
main is on the opposite side of the road from the lots and we
wanted to put the services under the road before the new paving was
placed. We have already collected money for one of the services.
Buzz Hill was working on an Ordinance to insure we collect on the
other five services. The third invoice was for the village share
of Engineering services .... $3'386.60.
Page 2
Pate Subdivision
September 22' 1992
Attached are the final invoices for the project. Total cost for
the road construction and storm sewer is *43,*22. The increased
cost above the $os'omo estimate was due to additional undercut and
use of pavement fabric required because of unsuitable soil
conditions found during exoavation. The total Engineering cost was
$3,386.60 which was less than the estimate of $3.900 to $5,850.
Chuok Boncio
CB/bv
C: Jeff wulbecker' Engineering
File
Invoice Nui'oer: 02EES Invoice Date: IS 'AY 199E Pace: I
Fro:: For Job: PATE To:
MANCINI CONSTRUCTION. INC. PATE 3UBDIVISI6N "RS LYNN FATE
578 W. COLFAX STREET MRS, LYNN GATE CIO SETON ENGINEERING 00.
CARDINAL LANE I300 WOLF ;;;OND
PALATINE, IL '00067— MT, PROSPECT, IL 60056 WiEELING. IL 60090-
7 LWT SUBDIVISION IN PPT. PROSPECT
ENGI'EER: S70N ENGINES=,ING
_ONTnACT AMOUNT: $110.376,00
CONTRACT GROSS --- EIENTION ---
PHASE DESCRIPTION AMOUNT 'QUANTITY RATE UNIT WIQNT A"OUNT GCT
iii STGrM S&ER. EXTRA: E5,40E.50 0.00 0.c?.c00.0:0 0,00 0.4.0
R & R .0" DIP
R & R 24" INLET
AMOUNT A;11`4T
Invoice S:areary Invai:e Totals
RE"JVE & REPLACE 10" D.I. PIPE Gross 1,-100."0
REMOVE & REPLACE 24° INLET Retention 0.00
au 0.00
Tan c 0.00
Current Aeount Due 112200.00
ACC
ACC -ACCO-PAVING CO.
1:7-mrum
1741 NORTH CALIFORNIA AVENUE (312) 276-1800
CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 606475103 FAX 312/276.9181
City of Mt. Prospect
c/o Seton Engineering Co. INVOICE No. 0-930
1300 S. Wolf Rd. DATE May 26, 1992
Wheeling, Il. 60090 JOB NO. 813
YOUR ORDER No.
ATTN: Bill Loftus TERMS:NET 30 days
INTEREST WILL 13E CHARGED AT THE RATE OF I'/.% PER MONTH ON ALL ACCOUNTS 30 n-1 —1 --
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: FILES
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: February 20, 1990
SUBJECT: Pate's Subdivision Offsite
Meeting held at Village Hall (2/14/90)
Attended by: John Fulton Dixon - Village Manager
Dave Clements - Director of P & Z
Bob Pszanka - Eng. Coordinator
Jim Meyer - M.B. Meyer & Assoc.
(Engr. for Developer - Helen Pate)
Note: Lots referred to in Meeting '-
Lot 1 - S.W. corner of Westgate & Wildwood
(306 N. Westgate)
Lot 2 - Reese's Subdivision (1221 Wildwood)
Lot 3 - 1219 Wildwood
Lot 4 - Unimproved lot west of Lot 3
1.) Widening of Wildwood Ln., East of Pate's Subdivision (Frontage
of Lots 1, 2, & 3).
Pavement width shall be 231 back to back of curb.
Developer's Engineer's Estimate for 382 L.F. = $38;964.00
C. Bencic's Village Estimate was 300 L.F. $29,053.00
Prorating C. Bencic's Estimate to 382 L.F. $37,000.00
Add to C. Bencic's estimate, a storm sewer at west end of
Lot 1 = $2,000.
Village cost would be $39,000. Note: figure does not
include engineering cost. Possible 10-15% or $3,900
$5,850.
A deduction to the Village's cost for Wildwood Ln. was to be
made by the Developer. The deduction was for the following
items: 1.) Elimination of one street light on offsite
Wildwood Ln. 2z) Shortening of pavement width from 291 B -B
to 231 B -B. In previous discussions, the figure of $6,500
was used. This figure was determined as follows: 1.) $3r500
for the street light 2.) $3,000 for pavement width
reduction. Per the Developer's Engineer, the $3,000 figure
was calculated by:
382 L.F. x (231-31) = 7,640 S.F. of pavement
Total cost = $38,964.00
.. vc
Page 2 Cost per sq.ft. of pavement = $5.10
Frontage of Lot 7 of Pate's Subln on Wildwood is 93.0'
Reduction Amount = 93.01 x (291 - 231) x $5.10
$2,845.80 rounded off to $3,000.
The Village feels that these two figures should be:
1.) $5,000 for street light, based on figure normally
used for Deed Covenants for street lighting. Actual cost
could be same as Developer's contract cost for installing
one street light in cul-de-sac.
2.) Pavement reduction figure should include offsite
"Lot 4"! This increase would make this figure:
(93.01 + 127.0) x (291- 231) x $5.10 = $6,732 or rounded
off to $6,800.
Total of 1.) & 2.) would be $11,800. Final figure would be
determined from actual contract costs.
2.) Street Improvement Recapture:
Because Pate's Subdivision's "contribution" includes
improvements to the frontage of "Lot 411, a recapture of
this cost will be allowed to Helen Pate. The Developer
of "Lot 411 shall be required to pay Helen Pate, the
Developer of Pate's Subdivision, for street improvements
across its frontage based on a 291 back to back width.
The recapture will be based on the same principle as
described in Pate's "contribution" to the Village. The
approximate amount would be 127.01 x 291 x $5.10 =
$18,783. Note: the street light cost would not be
included.
3.) Items waived by Village (offsite only)
A.) Permit Fees: 2 1/2% of total cost for review &
inspection waived. The Performance Letter of Credit
Guarantee was not waived.
B.) Pavement width shall be 231 B -B, in lieu of 291 B -B.
C.) One street light on offsite Wildwood Ln. was waived.
Street light in cul-de-sac is still required.
4.) Items to be paid for or installed by Village
Note: No cost figures were mentioned for these items.
A.) Public Sidewalk: Southside only, across frontage of Lots
2, 3, & 4.
B.) Landscaping: Sod restoration of south parkway.. Parkway
trees in south parkway. Trees might not be required
along Lots 2, 3, & 4, due to mature trees along right-
of-way line. Verify with Village Forester.
Page 3
mry C.) Sanitary Services: Six services, two each for Lots 2,
3, & 4, from sewer on Opus' property. Cost would include
fence and grass restoration.
D.) Cost Overruns: Not agreed to by Manager! Dependent on
nature of cost.
5.) Water Main Recapture
Main must be "looped" for Pate's Subdivision. offsite main
must be extended across frontage of Lots 1, 2, 3, & 4 to
Westgate Rd. Developer's Engineer had based his estimate on
offsite cost only.
Per Agreement at this Meeting, cost would be shared by 10
"Lots" for total water main cost from Cardinal Lane to
Westgate Road. The 10 "Lots" are Lots 1, 2, 3, 6, & 7 of
Pate's Subdivision, two "Lots" for "Lot 411, one "Lot" for "Lot
311, and two "Lots" for "Lot 211.
Final recapture cost would be based on "As -Built" contract
cost. Main would be installed by Developer's contractor.
\Village must review and approve contract, prior to
construction.
Main would consist of approximately 1100 L.F. of 811 D.I.W.M,
Class 56. One pressure connection at each end. One 811 line
valve. Three hydrants. Cardinal Lane would be open -cut at
crossing. A one -inch copper service and box would be
installed in parkway for each of the 10 "Lots".
Estimate of cost by B. Pszanka (see attached) , including
engineering would be $75,000.
NOTE: Service to Lots 4 & 5 of Pate's Subdivision will not
be included in this cost.
Bob
BP/m
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois --a
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Janonis, Village Manager
FROM: Chuck Bencic, Inspection Services Director
o/
DATE* August 13, 1992 A
RE: PATE SUBDIVISION - OFFSITE SANITARY SERVICES
Attached find a copy of the proposed ordinance requiring payment for
sanitary sewer services installed in conjunction with Pate's Subdivision
site improvements. As part of the Pate Subdivision some offsite
improvements were done including street reconstruction and installation
of sanitary services under the street to serve three existing lots.
These lots are large and have the possibility of being subdivided into
two lots each. In fact, since the improvements were completed one
lot has been subdivided and the owners of the second lot has expressed
interest in subdividing his lot.
The existing sanitary sewer is on the opposite side of Wildwood Lane
from the lots. The Village felt the sanitary sewer services should
be installed prior to the new road being construction to eliminate
the need for opening the new pavement to install the services.
This ordinance is being recommended to allow the Village to recapture
the cost of installation of the sanitary service.
Chuck Bencic
CB: rm,
Attach.
cc: Dave Jepson, Finance Director
Carol Fields, Village Clerk
Herb Weeks, Public Works Director
Engineering
File
STq4 go Adoo P9T3Tqa90 P paooea oq p94o9jTp Aqaaaq sT 4oadsoad
4unow go 9bvTTTA 944 90 XJaT3 9bPTTTA 914-4 '4'Pql IMUHI M011399
UT PTied sr 9bJlet[D 9144 9MT4 9'q-4 TT-4un pa4dopv ST 9OUVUT
PIO STqq 94PP
;aq4 mOJJ 40T aad avaA aad (%q) quaoaad XTS JO 94Pa 9q4 4P 4S9a94UT
aeaq TTV'45 UTiD;EiDTA paT4sT-[qe4sa SableT40 aq:4 4vqj
:OMS NoIlDas
-993 uo-dpq/UOT409UUOD TvuuOu 9q4 04 UOT4TPPV UT
PTvd aq TTRqs PUP S90TtL19S J9MBS AJP4TUPS 9q4 04 UOT409uuoO Tun4ole'
9q4 04 aOTad TTnj UT PTed aq TTPqs
UT9J9q q4lO3 49S S9blgqo aqj
00'sWzt 00'sLVIZ$ T, 4011
abae'40 TeUOT4TPPV ON
00'9LV'Z$ padOT9A9P APe9JTV C WrI
Ob2eT40 JeUOT4TPPV ON
00*GLVIZ$ p9doTaAaP APR8JTV z 4011
ja 00, AA -Ug v 95TElias
:SMOTTOJ
SR 40-E tIOPiD '4SUTebP passassv aq T-[iexls abapT4o qqLj .90UPUTPaO
s*rxl4 go 4oaCqns aq:4 bUT;9q S9T-4aadoad atl:4 4SUTIabe UOT.4PTTP
-4SUT
9OTt,19S a9d (00-9LV'Z$) sJPTTOG 9ATJ-AquaAas p9apunH anoj pupsnoqL'
Om,L go ab-lexio P qs-rTqe4sa Aqaa9T4' op :4oadso-Tcl qunoI4 go
9bleTTTA
9q4 JO sO9-4srul JO P-IPO9 Pup 4u;DPTs9.lcl 614-4 4PxTJj :aNO NOIJ, aS
:SIONIllqI 'AINnOD XOOD 'LlDadgOdd IMON aO aDVUUIA ally aO SaHISndi
ao auvos aNy maaisauci alli, Ag aaNIVG'dO II H9 'aUOdaHaHl 'MON
' S90TA-TaS
9q4 90 UOT4PTT94SUT go 4soo aq4 aoj Apd s4OT 9s9144 go saaumo ao/pue
aaumo alq,4 -4L,14-4 qoadsoad -4unoW go 9bPTTTA OT44 go s4U8PTS8;r 9q-4
go s4saaaquT qsaq aq4 uT ST 4T 4eX[4 P9UTUUa49P ueaq sPq 4T jSValdaHM
PUP !9OWL195 aad (00-GLV'Z$) savTTOU
9ATa-A4U9A9S p9apunH anon puvsnoql 'Oml 90 -4sOD uOT-4PTTP4su-E up
4P (9 90TA,29S PUP V 90TA-T9S) s90TAJ9s l9m9s A.TLMues' OA4 P9AT'9091
PUP PBaTnb9a OOUVUTP.10 STlq-4 go 4oalqns 9q4 bUTaq 40T qDR9 'SVaHaHM
PUP
!646T 19 )Uvnuvr
UO 6Z6ZgZT ON '4u9uinooG SV P9294STb9.1 Pup 686CLVVT
ON -4uamnooa se papzooe.1 'STOUTTTI IA4unoZ) N000 'uPTPTa9K
TpdTDUTad PaTT41 9T44 go 4SPa 'T44aON TT 9bUPH I ZV dTlqSUAOL
ISC uoi4oas
go a9-4ient5,4samT4,4noS aiq-4 go i94-TpnZ5 4sPqT44aON
BT44 90 UOTSTATpqns v Isuapapo qoadsoad z-[aoC)-V-Z) 'ZT
'4OrI JO UA�T
OT�T
. . . pqns s,UOsUqOr *V a94TPM 90 V PUP E 'Z s4orl
:sAOTTOJ sp paqTaOsaP
ATTPb9T aJV a0UeUTPaO STq4 go 409C
qns 9q4 bUTaq s4OT 9q4 'SVadaHI4
pup !4ogdsoad qunoki go 9bPTTTA 9q4 uT 9uvq
POOmPTTM uO s4OT 99aq4 04 s90TAa9s a9m9s AJP4Tuvs 90 UOT4PTTp:jSUT
aqq pa4aTdmoo spq 4c)adsozzcl -4unoW
30 9J5P7[l:TA 9TT4 svaHaHM
axvq—ao-o-m-a,m4 No Sa;)IMaS
HaMaS AHVIIMVS aO NOIIV'IrIVISNI
alll HOa SaDH"D ONIHSIrISVISa aoNVNIGHO Ny
ON aONVNIGHO
Z6/ T/OT
avz)/Hq
Sanitary Sewer Charges
Pate subdivision
Page 2 of 2
Ordinance so that the charges established herein shall constitute
a lien on the properties being the subject of this ordinance and
may be enforced in the manner provided by law.
SECTION FOR: That no water service, sewer service or building
permits shall be issued for the Subject Property until such time as
the charge assessed against property for which the permit is
requested has been paid in full.
SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the
manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk