HomeMy WebLinkAbout4699_001Next Ordinance No. 4467
Next Resolution No. 27-92
A G E N D A
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, lot Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
September 1S, 1992
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald 118kip" Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul 8oefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Milks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Floros
IV. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, September 1, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE BEARD
VII. MAYORMS REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: Fire Prevention Week,
October 4 - 11, 1992
B. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION:
C. Appointments
Public Works Department
ALL
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 36-V-92, 800 Ironwood Drive
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
800 IRONWOOD DRIVE
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow
a 240 square foot accessory building, rather
than the permitted 120 square foot structure.
The vote of the Zoning Board of Appeals was
3-1, resulting in a recommendation to deny
since 4 votes are necessary in order to
recommend granting a request. (Exhibit A)
B. ZBA 42-A-92, Text Amendment
lot reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14
(ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends the Zoning Ordinance to
require a special use permit for non-residential
uses in a residential district. (Exhibit B)
C.
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF VILLAGE OWNED PROPERTY
This Ordinance authorizes the sale of vehicles
no longer needed by the Village. These
vehicles will be sold in conjunction with the
Northwest Municipal Conference on Saturday,
October 17 at the Mount Prospect Public Works
Facility.
(Exhibit C)
D.
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING ADOPTION
OF A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AND COMMONWEALTH EDISON
(Exhibit D)
E.
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 5
OF THE VILLAGE CODE TO CREATE AN ECONOMIC
DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
(Exhibit E)
F.
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 4437, GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 228 AND 230 SOUTH PRAIRIE AVENUE
(Exhibit F)
IX. NEW
BUSINESS
A.
ZBA 51-V-92, 1702 West Algonquin Road
The Petitioner, Jameson's Char House, is
requesting a variation to waive the required
loading dock and to reduce the number of non-
conforming parking spaces by one. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0.
B.
ZBA 54 -SU -92, 416 South Mount Prospect Road
The Petitioner is requesting a special use
permit to allow a satellite dish ten feet in
diameter to be located in the rear yard.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
C. ZBA 58-V-92, 515 North Fairview
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a front yard setback of 231 611, instead
of the required 30 feet, in order to
construct a porch with overhead roof. the
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 5-1.
D. ZBA 55-V-92, 400 North Forest Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a five foot separation between the principal and
accessory structure, rather than the required
10 feet, in order to construct a two -car
detached garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of
5-0.
E. ZBA 62-V-92, 50 South Emerson Street
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a
maximum lot coverage of 90.05%, instead of the
permitted 75% and to allow 39 parking spaces,
instead of the required 55, in order to construct
a one-story addition to the Senior Citizen center.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by a vote of 5-0.
F. A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE ANNUAL
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
REPORT
This Resolution, as required by HUD, sets
forth the annual report, which.has been reviewed
and recommended by the Plan Commission. (Exhibit G)
G. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE COOK COUNTY
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP CONSORTIUM
This Resolution reaffirms the Village's
participation in the H.O.M.E. Program. (Exhibit H)
H. Accept improvements installed in -conjunction
with the.Rand Plaza, 301 East Rand Road
X. VILLAGE XAN1GNR18 REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Furniture for Police & Fire Headquarters
2. Stump cutter
B. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Personnel
XII. AWOURMCM
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
September 1, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Clowes. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the MINUTES
Mayor and Board of Trustees held August 18, 1992.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Wilks
Pass: Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse,
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 554,415
Refuse Disposal Fund
212,398
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
3,759
Community Development Block Grant,Fund
3,469
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
12,100
Water & Sewer Fund
66,716
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,238
Risk Management Fund
69,020
Vehicle Replacement Fund
-
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
Capital Improvement, Repl, or Repair Fund
392
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
5,000
Police & Fire Building Const.
357,636
Flood Control Revenue Fund
15,091
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
17,179
Police Pension Fund
47,245
Firemen's Pension Fund
46,191
Benefit Trust Funds
$1,411,849
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert,
Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVE BILLS
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
REFUSE
SERVICE
Emily McBride, 30,3 S. Emerson Street, expressedher
dissatisfaction the
'with change to one garbage
container per family, which goes into effect in 1993.
Mayor Farley invited her to attend the Committee of
the Whole meeting on September 8 when this matter will
be discussed..
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATION:
RICH SCHUTZ,
Mayor Farley presented a proclamation to Rich Schutz,
Mount
OLYMPIAN
a Prospect resident who participated in the 1992
Olympics in Barcelona
as a member of the ,Weightlifting,
Team. A medal depicting the Village logo was also
presented to Mr. Schutz with congratulations from the
Village Board and residents.
HUMAN SERVICES:
GOVERNOR'S HOME
Mayor Farley commended the Human Services staff and
TOWN AWARD
presented Nancy Morgan, Human Services Director, with
a Certificate,of Achievement
from the 1992 Governor's
Home Town Award Program for their volunteer
program.
POLICE EXPLORERS
Police Chief Ronald'Pavlock, Commander Michael
Salatino, and Officer Kenneth Lee conducted a swear -
in
ceremony for three members of the Police Explorer
Program who were recently promoted. Alex Chew, Brian
Lindgren, John
Maxwell, and their parents were
congratulated by the Mayor and Village Board.
AMEND CH. 13
CLASS 11W11 LIQUOR
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
ANNA'S
would increase the number of Class "W" liquor licenses
by one for
Annals Polish Restaurant, 2 West Busse
Avenue.
ORD. NO. 4463
Trustee FlQros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4463
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT'PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 36-V-92
ZBA 36-V-92, 800 Ironwood Drive
800 IRONWOOD
This Ordinance,
inance, scheduled for a second reading, was
not considered, due to the fact that the Petitioner
was unable to attend this meeting; second reading was
rescheduled for September 15.
ZBA 44-V-92
ZBA 44-V-92, 214 North Wille Street
214 N. WILLE
An Ordinance waspresented for second reading which
would allow an accessory structure 1.91 feet from the
side yard, rather than. the required 5 feet.
ORD. NO. 4464
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4464
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 214 NORTH WILLE STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Page 2 - September 1, 1992
Motion carried.
ZBA 49 -SU -92, 400 East Gregory Street
ZBA 49 -SU -92
An Ordinance was presented for second reading which
400 E. GREGORY
would allow the expansion of the Christian Life Church
by granting a Special Use for a Planned Unit Development.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
ORD. NO. 4465
passage of Ordinance No. 4465
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE
NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE
CHRISTIAN LIFE CHURCH/COLLEGE, 400 EAST
GREGORY STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 50 -SU -92, 999 North Elmhurst Road
ZBA 50 -SU -92
An Ordinance was presented for second reading which
999 N. ELMHaRST
would grant an,amendment to the PUD to allow the
Jewel Food Store to build a new structure in the
general area of the existing building.
After discussion between the Board and Attorney
ORD. NO. 4466
Cary Chickerneo, representing a neighboring restaurant
affected by the move, Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee
Clowes moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4466 with
conditions.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3604
GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OFA
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT GOVERNING PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 42-A-92, Text Amendment
ZBA 42-A-92
A request for a text amendment was presented which
TEXT AMENDMENT
would establish a Special Use category for all non-
residential uses in a single family area, such as
churches, schools and municipal facilities.
Several residents expressed their views and following
discussion mayor Farley instructed the Village staff
to give this proposal further study.
Village Manager Michael Janonis stated that he would
consult with Planning Director David Clements and
present this matter to the Board again on September 15.
Trustee Busse left the meeting at this time.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading which VEHICLE AUCTION
would allow the sale of surplus vehicles at the
Northwest Municipal Conference's public vehicle
auction on October 17, 1992.
Page 3 - September 1, 1992
This Ordinance will be presented September 15 for
second reading.
SIGHT
Six Ordinances were presented for first readings
OBSTRUCTIONS
which°would regulate the planting of shrub and trees
that Haight be considered as sight obstructions to
motorists, cyclists, or pedestrians.
Following d;isoussion Mayor Farley asked that this
matter be continued to the next Committee of the
Whole meeting September 22.
ECONOMIC
An Ordinance was presented for first reading which
DEVELOPMENT
.
would ,amend Chapter i5 of the Village Code to create
COMMISSION
an Economic Development Commission whose purpose
would be to encourage and facilitate economic growth
throughout the Village.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading
at the September 15 meeting of the Village Board.
An Ordinance was ted for fi I rs ng to
EDISONWVOMPH
authorize adoption of an franchise agreement
agreement between
AGREEMENT
Commonwealth Edison and the Village of Mount Prospect.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading
on September 15, -
VILLAGEMANAGER'S REPORT
BID RESULTS:
Village Manager Michael E. Janonis presented bid
results for the Prospect High Schaal Detention Basin:
PROSPECT HIGH
,ji== Cost
DETENTION BASIN
G. Edwards Trucking Company $47,500.00
T & W Edmier Corp, 58,116.00
G. EDWARDS
TRUCKING CO.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, mored
to concur with therecommendation of the administration
and accept the low .bid submitted by G. Edwards Trucking
Company for a totalexpenditure for the detention basin
not to emceed 47,500.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays:; None
Motion* carried.
SEMINOLE LANE
IMPROVEMENT
A Resolution was presented to authorize the improvement
of Seminole Lane as a'joint undertaking with Prospect
Heights using Federal Aid Urban Systems; "(FADS') funding.
RES. NO. 26-92
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,' moved for
passage, of Resolution No. 26-92
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING FAUS APPLICATION TO
THE NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE FOR THE
IMPROVEMENT OF SEMINOLE LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran,_ Floras
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4- September '1, 1992
Mr. Janonis reminded the Village Board and, residents 75TH
of the Labor Day picnic at Woodland Trails Park ANNIVERSARY
being sponsored by the Mount Prospect 75th Anniversary PICNIC
Committee.
Mr. Janonis also announced that the dedication and HISTORICAL
grand opening of the Mount Prospect Historical Society SOCIETY
will be September 12, Coffee with the Council, will be
.September 12, and the next Committee of the Whole
meeting will be September 8.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before the
Village Board, Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at
10:55 P.M.
Velma W. Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
Page 5 - September 1, 1992
� • 10 I
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
September 10, 1992
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
'Balance
9101192
9101/92 through
9110192
Per Attached Journal
List of ills Entry
Balance
9/1019,
General & Sn iial Rcy-enut Fins
General Fund
$ 1,652,436
$ 554,081
$ 536,523 $< 54,000>
$ 1,615,994
Refuse Disposal Fund
6,521
33,294
1,827
37,988
Motor Fuel Tax
411,948
108,773
-
520,721
Community Development Block Grant Fund
3,497
11,000
13,863
634
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
7,674
9,494
70,923 54,000
245
Entemrise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,095,206
274,464
80,638
3,289,032
Parking System Revenue
195,068
4,334
830
198,572
IntoW S vice Eunds
Risk Management Fund
1,303,602
16,772
49,752
1,270,622
Vehicle Replacement Fund
923,678
130
15,759
908,049
Capital Proiects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,488,026
18,931
14,142
1,492,815
Downtown Redev Const Funds
552,619
2,302
428
554,493
Police & Fire Building Construction
4,141,378
1,324
7,879
4,134,823
Flood Control Construction Fund
4,594,017
94,828
783,742
3,905,103
Debt Service Funds
908,335
1,664
-
909,999
Trust & Aggpgy Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
5,086
4,588
5,172
4,502
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,289,695
13,789
9,048
1,294,436
Police Pension Fund
17,761,027
17,145
-
17,778,172
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,688,131
10,813
-
19,698,944
Benefit Trust Funds
238.851
115
2.167
236,799
S18,266.Z4
177 41
�
$L7,151,943
VILLAGE OF.MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9f10f92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AABY BUILDERS
C11077 AABY BLDRS
$500.00
$500.00
AAH-HA WEIDNER
C11553 AAH-HA WEIDNERS
$100.00
C11679 AAH-HA
$$15.00
$$15.00
MALKO AWDISHO
REFUND OVERPAYMENT
$15.00
$15.00
$15.00
BERTHOLD NURSERY
GLOBAL RELEAF DRAWING
$1$2.00
$100.00
ELEANOR BROWN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.25$2.50
$2.75
CENTURY VILLAGE SQUARE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL$5.00
5. 00
$5.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.50
$5.50
CITIBANK, N.A.
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS GAB
$2,647.52
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS-GAB
$6,152.96
$8,800.48 *
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DANLEY LUMBER
920903BPMT P/R 93
$224.25
$224.25*
C10060 DANLE LUMBER
$100.00
$100.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCT
PfR ENDING 9f03f92
$402,050.36
PfR ENDING 9f03f92
$1,324.23
PfR ENDING 9f03f92
$758.70
PfR ENDING 9f03f92
$37,532.43
PfR ENDING 9f03f92
$1,713.04
PfR ENDING 9f10f92
$35,807.13
1092
$3,3$2.90
$482,548.79*
DONALD A. DREESSEN D.V.M.
R FUNDDING FINALfWATER BILL
$2.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.25
$2.75
EZELL BUILDING CONSTR.CO.,INC.
C10680 EZELL BLDRS
$500.00
C11567 EZELL BLDRS
$100.00
$600.00
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
AUG 92 MED BENEFIT REIMB
$4,324.16
AUG 92 DEP CARE REIMB
$848.00
$5,172.16*
KENNETH GONG
50% FACADE REBATE
$3,315.00
$3,315.00
JUAN GONZALEZ
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$10.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.00
$11.00
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
$7,819.71
$7,819.71
HANSIES SUPREME SERVICES
C11424 HANSIES SUPREME
75.00
HELLER, SHAPIRO & FRISONE
WAGE DEDUCTION 86L17269
$1,$75.97
$1, 38.97*
SCOTT HENK
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.25
$2.75
HUGH GILGUNN INC.
C11254 HUGH GILGUNN
$75.00
$75.00
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
EMPLOYER SHARE AUG 92
$42,707.70
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
ANTON KLUN
KNOLLWOOD FIRE DEPARTMENT
ANDREW KOLIOPOULOS
JOHN KOVARIK
LAKE -COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY
LEIBFORTH GROUPS LTD.
TOSHIKO C. LIN
MARYVILLE ACADEMY
RODNEY MOBUS
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
NORDIC CONSTRUCTION
OLYMPIC SIGNS, INC.
PATTERSON CONSTRUCTION
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
PAUL RILEY CO.
ROSCOR CORPORATION
SANYO FISHER
SCHMIDT BROS.
SHILLING MECHANICAL
SURE LIGHT SIGNS
SZABO CONTRACTING
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
EMPLOYEE SHARE AUG 92
$17,022.60
$59,730.30*
920903APMT P/R 9/3
$254.00
$254.00*
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$46.81
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.72
$51.53
REFUND PUMP COURSE
$50.00
$50.00
C11156 ANDREW KOLIOPOULOS
$75.00
$75.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$10.00
$11.00
NO LEAD GASOLINE
$8,541.06
$8,541.06
C11064 LEIBFORTH GROUPS
$50.00
$50.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$61.64
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL$6.22
$67.86
FAIR SHARE DONATION
$406.12
$406.12
CO230 RODNEY MOBUS
$50.00
$50.00*
SAVINGS BONDS P/R 9/3
$450.00
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/3
$1,348.84
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/3
$100.26
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/3
$11,192.25
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/3
$2,825.83
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/3
$57.54
DUE TO FED DEP PR 9/3
$113.61
$16,088.33-
C11082 NORDIC CONST
$500.00
$500.00
0770 OLYMPIC SIGNS
$100.00
0771 OLYMPIC SIGNS.
$100.00
$200.00
011271 PATTERSON CONST
$100.00
$100.00
POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT
$3,000.00
$3,000.00-
C11508 PAUL RILEY CO
$100.00
$100.00
EQUIPMENT
$2,283.50
$2,283.50
C9851 SANYO FISHER
$110.00
$110.00
920812 SCHMIDT BROS
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
C11419 SHILLING MECH
$50.00
$50.00
1412 SURE LIGHT CO
$100.00
1413 SURE LIGHT CO
$100.00
$200.00
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
$91,021.11
$91,021.11
AG7 BOND MONEY
$1,175.00
Sl BOND MONEY
$625.00
$1,800.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY SWEET ROLLS 75TH ANN MTG $5.40 $5.40
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. EXPENSES $90.03 $90.03
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ***TOTAL** $95.43
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVALREPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/102
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
TROUBLE SHOOTERS
C11389 TROUBLE SHOOTERS
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
B338 PETER PANAGAPOULOS
$15.00
CO230 R MOBUS
$50.00
C11064 LEIBFORTH
$50.00
C11156 KOLIOUPOULOS
$25.00
C11254 HUGH GILGUNN
$25.00
C11424 HANSIES SUPREME
$25.00
C11443 PREMIER BLDRS
$100.00
C5140 DECOUT 2001
$100.00
0447 GRATE SIGNS
$50.00
0448 GRATE SIGNS
$50.00
0451 OPUS
$50.00
REIMB STICKERS
80.00
$620.00*
VITAL RECORD BANC INC.
MICROFILMINGE
$2 , 198.54
$2,198.54
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$699,567.46
GENgRAL FUND
$458,839.43 REFUSE DISPOSAL
FUND
$1,826.65
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$1,424.49 ILL. MUNICIPAL
RETIREMENT FUND
$70,922.55
WATER & SEWER FUND
$43,876.30 PARKING SYSTEM
REVENUE FUND
$816.24
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$8,800.48 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$7,819.71
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
$91,021.11 FLEXCOMP ESCROW
FUND
$5,172.16
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$9,048.34
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY SWEET ROLLS 75TH ANN MTG $5.40 $5.40
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. EXPENSES $90.03 $90.03
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES ***TOTAL** $95.43
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $95.43
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
EDWARD CAVELLO
IPMA-CHICAGO METRO CHAPTER
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ICMA
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
WILLIAM ROSCOP
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
JEFFREY WULBECKER
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
FLOWERS -WADE
$28.00
$28.00
EXPENSES
$834.00
$834.00
IPMA DUES -RUSSELL
$10.00
$10.00
PRE -EMP PHYSICAL -TEED
$217.00
$217.00
PUBLICATION
$59.50
$59.50
SUPPLIES
$85.85
$85.85
JULY LEGAL SERVICES
$35.48
JULY LEGAL SERVICES
$42.50
JULY LEGAL SERVICES
$247.50
JULY LEGAL SERVICES
$1 611.70
JULY LEGAL SERVICES
217.08
JULY LEGAL SERVICES
$42.50
$2,196.76
EXPENSES
5.75
EXPENSES
$30.17
EXPENSES
$97.05
$132.97
EXPENSES$43.24
SUPERSTAR FEST EXPENSES
$3$43.24
$337.39*
JULY LEGAL FEES
$4,821.13
$4,821.13
EXPENSES
$6.37
$6.37
***TOTAL**
$8,772.21
$8,772.21
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AMOCO OIL COMPANY GAS -593-057-401-6 $29.60 $29.60
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$28.50
PAGE 5
ELEK-TEK, INC.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$1,553.21
$1,553.21
GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION
PAYMENT DATE 9/10/92
$134.90
$134.90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
MICE COMPUTERSZPRINTER
$21.00
$215.00
AT&T
016 089 7465 001
$591.21
$591.21
EDWARD FRANCE
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$30.63
$9.62
POSTMASTER
SERVICE
$50.00
$1,$73.34*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
SUPPLIES
351432
$2,.54
$2,.17
MELANIE KRUPP
COMMICE
ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25
$25
$25.00
CAROLYN A. MILLER
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
SUSAN MUELLER
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
CHERYL L. PASALIC
REIMS CONF EXPENSES
$163.45
$163.45
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$12.97
EXPENSES
$15.$3
EXPENSES
$8.97
$37.77
TASCHO SAEMS
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
ROBERT TOBA
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$3,404.20
GENERAL FUND
$3,404.20
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
FLOWERS -WADE
$28.50
$28.50
ELEK-TEK, INC.
EQUIPMENT
$1,553.21
$1,553.21
GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION
FASTENERS
$134.90
$134.90
Z.B.M. CORPORATION - BC5
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$194.00
MICE COMPUTERSZPRINTER
$21.00
$215.00
METRO EXPRESS, INC.
DELIVERY
$18.90
$18.90
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
TR TAX TRANSACTIONS AUG 92
$130.00
$130.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$9.62
$9.62
POSTMASTER
VEHICLE FOLLOW UP POSTAGE
$lr$73.
$1,$73.34*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
SUPPLIES
$73.1188
$73.18
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
ENVELOPES
$405.00
$405,00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS 2 MEDALLIONS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SUPPLIES
ON TINE MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND $158.71
$13.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$126.71
PAGE 6
$19.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
***TOTAL**
$158.71
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
PAYMENT DATE 9/10/92
$886.00
$886.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SUBSCRIPTION
$1,443.35
$1,443.35
TRACS
SEPT CONNECT FEE
$50.00
$50.00
XEROX CORPORATION
AUG CHGS 1090 COPIER
$2,413.21
$2,413.21
XL/DATACOMP INC.
MICE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$6,917.90
GENERAL FUND
$6,917.90
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS 2 MEDALLIONS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SUPPLIES
ON TINE MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND $158.71
$13.00
$13.00
$126.71
$126.71
$19.00
$19.00
***TOTAL**
$158.71
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD
SEPT EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM
$10,371.05
MED CLAIMS THRU 8/31
$25,816.30
$36,187.35*
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
SEPT 92 SERVICE FEES
$886.00
$886.00
CESAR G. MANIQUIS, M.D., LTD.
SEgVICES-SZONN
$130.00
$130.00
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
SUBSCRIPTION
$1,443.35
$1,443.35
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SVCS 9002113144-X
$143.00
$143.00
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
SVCS-GOMEZ
$31.00
SERVICES-BARRETT
$34.00
$65.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9110192
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
SUSAN REYNOLDS
REIMB REYNOLDS
$44.56$44.56*
M. STEPHENS & CO., INC.
PUMP CANOPY REPAIRS
$2,052.40
$2,952.40
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
***TOTAL**
$40,951.66
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$40,951.66
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
SERVICES RENDERED
$70.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$80.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$260.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$60.00
$470.00
GREGORY G. GRAHAM
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$51.73
$51.73
LES HANNEMAN
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$36.20
$36.20
LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
SYMPHONY UPGRADE
$99.00
$99.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$95.28
$95.28
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$13.90
EXPENSES
$9.62
EXPENSES
$27.00
$50.52
CHRISTINE VANDORNICK
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$26.98
$26.98
XLIDATACOMP INC.
MICE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$842.75
GENERAL FUND
$842.75
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
JOSE CASTRO
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
DAVID T. NICHOLSON
RAY O'HERRON CO., INC.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
PARTS
PARTS
REIMB MEMBER FEES
ENVELOPES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
ADVANCE EXPENSES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$2,445.97
INVOICE AMOUNT
$57.99
$305.09
$75.00
$62.51
$27.48
$300.00
$100.00
$19.37
$21.10
$16.69
$121.99
$230.00
$1,024.00
$84.75
***TOTAL**
PAGE 8
TOTAL
$363.08
$75.00
$62.51
$467.95
$138.68
$230.00
$1,108.75
$2,445.97
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
$178..95
$178.95
AERO SUPPLY
PARTS STAND
$151.10
$151.10
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC; INC.
EMITTERS
$3,831.00
$3,831.00
ALDUS CORPORATION
TECHNICAL SUPPORT
$179.00
$179.00
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
GAS -593-057-401-6
45.30
$45.30
DON ANDERSON
SUPPLIES
824.63
REIMB DINNERS
$17.75
$42.38
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
LINEN SERVICE
$45.27
LINEN SERVICE
$81.60
LINEN SERVICE
$38.02
$164.89
ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN RRS
PUBLICATION
$40.00
$40.00
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY
BERRY BEARING CO
BUSSE HARDWARE
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC.
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
COMMISH
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CREST COMPUTER SUPPLY
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
WILKIE ESCONDO
FAGEL EMS SPECIALTIES
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
FRANKLIN INT'L. INST., INC.
GIUSEPPE'S ITALIAN RESTAURANT
GEORGE GRIVAS ASSOCIATES, LTD.
H R HART PHOTO
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN
ILLINOIS FIRE SAFETY ALLIANCE
J AND N ENTERPRISES, INC.
LANCE CONSTRUCTION SUPPLY
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10%92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
2 DAY PLANNERS
$28.90
$28.90
1 TRANS CASE END BEARING
$41.36
$41.36
UPS COSTS
$31.07
$31.07
070 0057060 0
$202.34
$202.34
SERVICES
$401.50
$401.50
AD -F F EXAM
$561.60
$561.60
SUBSCRIPTION COMMISH
$65.90
$65.90
BA77-JT-2404-A
$8.44
$8.44
FAX MACHINE
$677.50
$677.50
ENVELOPES
$62.50
$62.50
MTCE SUPPLIES
$113.00
$113.00
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$150.72
$150.72
VEST PATCHES
$107.00
$107.00
LETTERHEAD ENVELOPES
$135.00
MEMO SHEETS
$76.00
$211.00
SEMINAR-ULREICH
$195.00
$195.00
DINNERS-EMER SVC PERSONNEL
$44.41
$44.41
SERVICES RENDERED
$300.00
$300.00
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$6.24
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$9.29
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$8.88
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$19.63
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$11.78
PHOTO SUPPLIES
WOOD
54.17
59.99
827.58
$27.58
SERVICE
$192.14
SERVICE
$75.08
SERVICE
$400.00
SERVICE
$87.36
$754.58
SEMINAR-ESCONDO
$20.00
IFSTA OVERHEAD SLIDES
$105.00
$125.00
10 TICKETS
$250.00
$250.00
SUPPLIES
$104.38
$104.38
EQUIPMENT
$101.96
$101.96
FASTENERS
$40.62
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$119.70
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
LYN NORSTAD & ASSOC., INC.
MACWAREHOUSE
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
NATIONAL FIRE & ARSON REPORT
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
NORTHEASTERN IL ASSE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
ORDER FROM HORDER
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
QUALEX, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9%10/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
CLIP BOARDS
BINDERS
EQUIPMENT RENTAL
SUPPLIES
SERVICE PARTS
SERVICE PARTS
CHAIRS
ALT & REG
FIRE & ARSON REPORT
MEMBER-CAVELLO
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
REGISTER KORDECK
REGISTER ULREICH
SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE AD
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
REGISTER GARY KLEIN
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$31.50
$45.44
$280.00
$92.00
$32.00
$250.00
$1,894.92
$125.00
$28.00
$170.00
$94.00
$80.00
$80.00
$2.25
$170.58
$26.37
$68.58
$21.37
$6.61
$26.27
J3.24
$5.52
$3.49
$17.72
$12.00
$10.23
$6.41
$2.03
$18.38
$59.00
$26.85
$26.50
$7.24
$7.74
$13.27
$4.77
PAGE 10
TOTAL
$237.26
280.00
$92.00
$282.00
$1,894.92
$125.00
$28.00
$264.00
$160.00
$2.25
$170.58
$94.95
$153.27*
$59.00
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
RED WING SHOE STORE
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
SPANISH AMERICAN LANGUAGE
SPRING ALIGN
SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
THE CHICAGO DAILY DEFENDER
TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN.
VALEO INC.
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT,
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9110/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$173.40
SUPPLIES
$300.20
SUPPLIES
$38.56
$598.53
BOOTS
$45.00
BOOTS
$121.00
BOOTS
$121.00
BOOTS
$77.35
SHOE REPAIR
$38.25
BOOTS
$120.70
BOOTS
$120.70
BOOTS
$93.00
$737.00
MACH SVC
$76.50
$76.50
MTCE SUPPLIES
$140.17
$140.17
AD -F F EXAM
$362.40
$362.40
ALIGNMENT
$45.00
$45.00
SUPPLIES
$333.00
SUPPLIES
$9.00
$342.00
SUPPLIES$86.75
SUPPLIES
$15.95
SUPPLIES
$78.02
SUPPLIES
$124.21
$304.93
AD -F F EXAM
$84.80
$84.80
SUPPLIES
$193.10
SUPPLIES
$28.18
$221.28
BACK SUPPORT BELTS
$599.52
$599.52
***TOTAL** $16,613.71
$14,407.08 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $2,206.63
********************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BOLASH CONSTRUCTION
VILLAGE OF. MOUNT PROSPECT
$7,500.00
PAGE 12
KENNETH GONG
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$63.94
$63.94
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
PAYMENT DATE 9110/92
$4,435.00
$4,435.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
CDBG 713 N EASTWOOD
$350.00
$350.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$400.00
$400.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$10.50
$12,559.87
GENERAL FUND
SUPPLIES
$10.45
$20.95
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$6.60
EXPENSES
$63.70
$70.30
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$491.25
GENERAL FUND
$491.25
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
BOLASH CONSTRUCTION
CDBG-300 S WILLIAM
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
KENNETH GONG
50% FACADE REBATE
$63.94
$63.94
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
CDBG-300 S WILLIAM
$4,435.00
$4,435.00
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SERVICES
$154.00
$154.00
WILKIN INSULATION COMPANY
CDBG 713 N EASTWOOD
$350.00
$350.00
ZONING BULLETIN
ZONING BULLETIN
$56.93
$56.93
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$12,559.87
GENERAL FUND
$120.87 COMMUNITY
DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$12,439.00
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC. BAR OIL$50.00 $50.00
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $16.28
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9110192
PAGE 13
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
ARROW -ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
ATHEY PRODUCTS CORPORATION
AUTUMN LANDSCAPING & MTCE.INC.
BEN MEADOWS COMPANY, INC.
BERTHOLD NURSERY
BUDGET SIGN COMPANY
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONRAD AND SON
J.N. DAVEY & ASSOCIATES,INC.
FOLEY-BELSAW CO.
G & K SERVICES
GATEWAY SUPPLY CO.
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
HEIGHTS CERTIFIED PLUMBING, IN
HOOK'S NURSERY INC.
ILLINOIS ARBORIST ASSOCIATION
ITEC
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
CREDIT
INSTALL MORTISE
ROAD TACK SS -1
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
TURF MOWING
TURF MOWING
SUPPLIES
TREES BUSHES
SCREENING CHARGE
JULY 92 SERVICE
WATER USAGE
HERBICIDE
GRASS SEED
SEPT 92 JANITORIAL SERVICE
SERVICE
MTCE SUPPLIES
PULSER
SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
PAINT
PAINT
PAINT
PAINT
SERVICES RENDERED
SHRUBS
REGISTER W. SCHULTZ
SUPPLIES
$13.66
$57.54
$139.31
$226.79
$709.62
$36.00-
$673.62
$88.84
$88.84
$100.00
$100.00
$74.85
$55.65
$130.50
$523.86
$523.86
$475.00
$4,910.00
$5,385.00
$107.65
$107.65
$2,291.50
$2,291.50
$176.00
$176.00
$126.50
$126.50
$69.67
$69.67
$43.60
$755.00
$798.60
$3,592.00
$3,592.00
$8,203.07
$8,203.07
$1,015.25
$1,015.25
$167.22
$167.22
$67.20
$67.20
$151.70
$151.69
$303.39
$236.86
$17.84
$254.70
$91.40
$47.43
$72.00
$94.84
$305.67
$286.07
$286.07
$400.00
$400.00
$170.00
$170.00*
$152.30
E931� 00 �
STREET DIVISION
INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER,
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBOR
MELS J. JOHNSON
CHARLES KLEHM & SON NURSERY
STEFAN LORENZ
DONALD MAY
CONRAD MAZESKI
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
ROSEMONT GARDENS
RUEFFER STAMP WORKS
SOLVENT SYSTEMS INT'L. INC.
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION
VILLAGE OF.MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10%92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$1,250.76
SUPPLIES
$247.70
$1,650.76
STEEL & ALUMINUM
$125.00
$125.00
MEMBER FEE-SCHULTZ
$70.00
TEST FEE -W. SCHULTZ
$100.00
$170.00*
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$3,000.00
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$389.60
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$259.60
$3,649.20
FLOWERS
$114.00
$114.00
SfC SIDEWALK
$98.00
$98.00
RSEIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
SIC SIDEWALK
$112.00
$112.00
TONER
$88.78
$88.78
SUPPLIES
$38.94
WARNING LITES
$118.75
$157.69
SUPPLIES
$1,283.00
$1,283.00
1601 W GOLF RD
$113.92
50 S EMERSON ST
$40.34
11 S PINE ST
$310.17
100 S EMERSON ST
$508.92
1700 W CENTRAL AVE
$281.72
$1,255.07
SUPPLIES
$18.93
$18.93
EXPENSES
$10.10
$10.10*
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
43.95
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
815.69
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$79.96
EXPENSES
$9.95
EXPENSES
$27.25
$176.80*
PARTS
$143.62
$143.62
AUG92 OFFICE SUPPLIES
$147.58$147.58
1 PALLET SOD
$132.00
$132.00
ROUTING STAMP
$14.49
$14.49
RECYCLING OIL FILTERS
$200.00
$200.00
SUPPLIES
$14.27
SUPPLIES
$7.84
$22.11
DRUM INSERT
$40.55
$40.55
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
TECH SYN CORPORATION
FRED WALTERS
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
HOSE & FITTINGS
REFUND S C SIDEWALK
WHITE SHEETING
FOLDING STOP SIGNS
FOLDING STOP SIGNS
$39,099.60
PAGE 15
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$109.62 $109.62
$128.00 $128.00
$189.20
$3,000.00
$500.00 $3,689.20
***TOTAL** $39,099.60
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
APEX POWER
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BARI CONTRACTORS
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONRAD AND SON
FLOW -TECHNICS
FRANZ DISCOUNT OFF. PRODUCTS
G & K SERVICES
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
HELLER LUMBER CO.
I.B.M. CORPORATION - BC5
PARTS
$21.79
$21.79
EQUIPMENT
$232.25
$232.25
PHOTO PAGES
$17.11
$17.11
MARCH 92 MTCE
$550.00
MTCE SERVICES
$550.00
$1,100.00
WATER MAIN CONTRACT
$22,365.23
$22,365.23*
SYPMPATHY-MATTSON
$66.00
$66.00
BB72-JT-5608-D
$124.78
$124.78
MTCE SUPPLIES
$1,028.00
$1,028.00
EQUIPMENT
$2,208.62
$2,208.62
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$60.25
$60.25
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.69
UNIFORM SERVICES
$151.70
$303.39
WATER METER LABOR
$95.16
WATER METER LABOR
$333.06
WATER METER LABOR
$71.37
WATER METER LABOR
$404.43
$904.02
SUPPLIES
$92.53
$92.53
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTERSIPRINTER
$21.00
$215.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9110%92
PAGE 16
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
INMAC
IPWSOA
R. E. JACOBY COMPANY
JERRY MCINTOSH
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
NET MIDWEST, INC.
DAVID C. NEWMAN
NEWS 3X/400
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
NUMERIDEX
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
CANTILEVERED SHELF
RELAY RACK
REGISTER MCINTOSH
MICE SUPPLIES
ADVANCE EXPENSES
WARNING LITES
SAMPLES
JULY 92 COLIFORM ANALYSIS
LEGAL SERVICES
SUBSCRIPTION
SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA
117 N WAVERLY
1700 W CENTRAL AVE
NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND
SUPPLIES
PLOTTER PAPER
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
PARTS
$30.63
$203.83
$533.12
$37.04
$30.63
$30.63
$61.25
$30.63
$97.32
$17.39
$300.00
$24.60
$1,397.07
$57.72
$174.51
$232.23
$40.00
$40.00-
$1,447.14
$1,447.14
$231.60
$231.60
$118.75
$118.75
$190.00
$260.00
$450.00
$233.75
$233.75
$119.00
$119.00
$11.51
$14.93
$281.71
$11.93
$320.08
$112.95
$112.95
$54.06
$54.06
$33.41
$10.93
$11.94
$75.00
$21.29
$19.99
44.73
$217.29*
$$43.62
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9110%92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
POSTMASTER
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
STANNARD POWER EQUIP. COMPANY
TECH SYN CORPORATION
TOWN & COUNTRY LANDSCAPE
V & G PRINTERS INC.
WATER PRO SUPPLIES INC.
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER & SEWER FUND
PARTS
PARTS
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILL$
FILM PROCESSING
MICE SUPPLIES
SERVICE PARTS CLEANERS
MICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
MICE SUPPLIES
HOSE & FITTINGS
HOSE & FITTINGS
HOSE & FITTINGS
EDGING
SERVICE TAGS
PIPING
$36,761.82
INVOICE AMOUNT
$161.19
$2.09
$553.3'6
$13.25
$15.50
$336.50
$444.96
$25.08
$58.16
$90.90
$4.38
$41.20
$64.04
$31.20
$330.00
$733.50
***TOTAL**
PAGE 17
TOTAL
$306.90
$553.36*
$13.25
$15.50
$336.50
$444.96
$83.24
$90.90
$109.62
$31.20
$330.00
$733.50
$36,761.82
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 19 NORTHWEST HWY $13.69 $13.69
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $13.69
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $13.69
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10%92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC.
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$230.00
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$230.00
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$200.00
$660.00
ARCHIPLAN INTERNATIONAL LTD.
SERVICES RENDERED
$4,116.00
$4,116.00
EMERGE A STAR
AMBULANCE CHASSIS
$9,163.00
AMBULANCE CHASSIS
$3,000.00
$12,163.00*
INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER,
STEEL & ALUMINUM
$432.71
STEEL & ALUMINUM
$432.71
$865.42
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
WARNING LITES
$47.50
WARNING LITES
$47.50
$95.00
NATIONAL SEWER & WATER, INC.
SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
$670,034.07
$670,034.07
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
JULY LEGAL SERVICES
$427.70
$427.70
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$431.57
PARTS
$431.57
PARTS
$241.43
PARTS
$134.86
PARTS
$376.28
$1,615.71
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
MICE SUPPLIES
$510.07
MTCE SUPPLIES
$510.07
$1,020.14
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
SERVICE RENDERED
$22,687.16
$22,687.16
TROW MIRZA
SERVICES
$2,365.40
SERVICES
$3,539.90
SERVICES
$1,314.10
$7,219.40
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$720,903.60
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$15,759.27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
$4,116.00
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$7,879.40 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$427.70
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
$22,687.16 FLOOD CONTROL CONST
FUND 1992
$670,034.07
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 9/10/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC 1 RETAINING RING $44.08 $44.08
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $44.08
GENERAL FUND $44.08
PENSIONS
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $200.00
CHARLES W. NICK SEPT 92 PENSION $883.22 $883.22
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT OCTOBER MEDICAL INSURANCE $510.00 $510.00
PAUL H. WATKINS SEPT DISABILITY BENEFIT $1,456.83 $1,456.83
PENSIONS ***TOTAL**
$3,050.05
GENERAL FUND
$883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $1,592,693.96
DATE RUN 9/10192
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
TIME RUN 12.02.57
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 9110192
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$536,522.70
21
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$1,826.65
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$13,863.49
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$70,922.55
31
BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$80,638.12
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$829.93
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
15,759.27
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
49,752.14
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$14,142.34
53
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$7,879.40
56
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$427.70
58
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
$113,708.27
59
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992
$670,034.07
73
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$5,172.16
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$9,048.34
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,592,693.96
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
August 1, 1992 - August 31, 1992
Fund
Revenues
Expenditures
Fund
Balance
for
for
Balance .
July 31.1992
August 1992
August 1992
Aug 31,12N
General and Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 2,054,396
$ 910,407
$1,231,388
$ 1,733,415
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
443,567
92,829
219,203
317,193
Community Development Block Grant
<9,452>
8,000
9,345
< 10,797>
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
<73,153>
1,916
57,383
< 128,620>
Refuse Disposal Fund
<277,627>
64,903
215,694
< 428,418>
Erise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,306,754
535,340
472,318
3,369,776
Parking System Revenue Fund
181,523
15,419
6,138
190,804
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,119,108
231,768
98,163
1,252,713
Vehicle Replacement Fund
926,277
3,300
3,493
926,084
CjVital ejects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,400,760
74,429
51,826
1,423,363
Downtown Redev. Const. Funds
542,704
3,211
1,189
544,726
Police & Fire Building Construction
4,543,639
21,484
366,886
4,198,237
Flood Control Const. Fund
4,633,429
103,097
248,857
4,487,669
Debt Service Funds
929,998
5,201
-
935,199
unds
Trust & Agenc Fund
Flexcomp Trust
-
-
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
-
-
-
_
Police Pension Fund
17,763,921
160,255
80,595
17,843,581
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,664,704
194,553
87,191
19,772,066
Benefit Trust Funds
245.694
1.471
2.167
244.998
X57 34 24$2.427,H3
$3 51 3
$56,671,989
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U N N A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
TAX REVENUE
10,671,550.00
583,739.13
1,384,867.14
9,286,682.86
87.02
FEE REVENUE
1,833,000.00
70,282.43
1,107,553.38
725,446.62
39.57
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
2,570,700.00
162,416.55
657,906.03
1,912,793.97
74.40
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
376,500.00
29,312.10
102,676.68
273,823.32
72.72
FINES AND FORFEITS
325,700.00
27,334.57
$4,563.63
241,136.37
74.03
OTHER REVENUE
565.550,00
37,318,54
1$3,113,§g
3$,2,436.40
67.62
FUND TOTALS
1M43.-991-00-
910A3.0 .2,fU,319,54
_3 -2
3-520.600, 4,46
1
78.45 %
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
TAX REVENUE
1,852,650.00
4,657.09
21,738.00
1,830,912.00
98.82
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
.00
4,670.18
4,670.1$
4,670.18-
.00
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
717,250.00
55,556.69
231,957.43
485,292.57
67.66
OTHER REVENUE
2.500.00
20,01
342.33
2,157,67
$6.30
FUND TOTALS 2.572,400,00 64,903.97 258,707.94 2,313,692,06 $9.94 %
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,047,500.00 91,007.44 271,802.68 775,697.32 74.05
OTHER REVENUE 501100.00 1,822.27 10,393-27 39,706.73_ 79.25
FUND. TOTALS 1, 7
O9,§&Qg 92.829.71 282.195,95 815,404.05 74,28 %
COMMUNITY OEYLPMT Bk= GRANT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 250,900.00 8,000.00 8,000,00 242,900.00 96.81
OTHER REVENUE MOOMO .00 27,306.722,306.72- 9.22 -
FUND TOTALS ?75_9(
0
Q 8,w0,00 35- 306,722 240,593.20 87.20 %
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE 760,950.00 11881.10 8,780.42 752,169.58 98.84
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 55,000.00 .00 39,532.57 15,467.43 28.12
OTHER REVENUE 2,500-00 35.38 475,64 2,024J6 80.97
FUND TOTALS - 818,420.00 1,916,48 48-788,63 Z091661.37 94.03 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U N N A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
BENEFIT TRUST #2 AMOUNT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE M500-00 1,460.83 4,847.20 ____Ig_6S2.8Q_ 68.39
FUND TOTALS 18,500.00 1,460.83 5,047.20 12,652.80 68.39 %
BENEFIT TRUST #3
OTHER REVENUE 00 9.67 40,67 40,67- .00
FUND TOTALS .00 9.67 40,67 40,67- Do %
LIBRARY FUND
TAX REVENUE
2,220,425.00 .00
.00 2,220,425.00 100.00
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
75,370.00 .00
.00 75,370.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE
574,630.00 .00
.00 574,630.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,870,425.00 .00 .00 2,870,425.00 100.00 %
WAIJI & §EWER FUND
FEE REVENUE
TAX REVENUE
1,357,900.00
4,004.36
18,205.26
1,339,694.74
98.65
FEE REVENUE
17,500.00
360.00
1,215.00
16,285.00
93.05
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
4,437,500.00
513,954.86
1,722,244.23
2,715,255.77
61.18
OTHER REVENUE
- 652750.00
17,021.6979,104.41
03,645.59
87.98
FUND TOTALS 6,465,650.00 535,340.91 1,820 768.90 4,644,0$1.10 71.83 %
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
FEE REVENUE
2,880.00
240.00
960.00 1,920.00
66.66
PARKING REVENUE
177,500.00
14,782.69
57,870.29 119,629.71
67.39
FINES AND FORFEITS
. .00
.00
82.50 82.50-
.00
OTHER REVENUE
12,000.00
396.93
2,227-53 9.072.47
75.60
FUND TOTALS 192,380.00 15,419.62 61,$40.32 130.539." 67.95 %
V I L L A G E O F N 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M N A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 2,092,000.00 209,051.10 633,422.40 1,458,577.60 69.72
OTHER REVENUE 426,500.00 ....., 17.ZO.. 153,250�81_ 273,249,19 64.06
FUND TOTALS 2.518,500.00 2 ?_ 786.673.21 1,7 X679 68.76 %
CAPITAL MP V M NT FUND
BUDGET
CUR MO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
627,600.00
.00
627,600.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
47,500,00
31294.50
15,609.99
31,890.01
67.13
FUND TOTALS
— 7ES 190�,(1Q
ESQ
643,209.99
31,890.01
4.72 X
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 2,092,000.00 209,051.10 633,422.40 1,458,577.60 69.72
OTHER REVENUE 426,500.00 ....., 17.ZO.. 153,250�81_ 273,249,19 64.06
FUND TOTALS 2.518,500.00 2 ?_ 786.673.21 1,7 X679 68.76 %
CAPITAL MP V M NT FUND
TAX REVENUE
293,300,00
1,043.61
4,871.26
288,428.74
98.33
FEE REVENUE
120,000.00
8,348.67
33,558.68
86,441.32
72.03
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
9901000.00
48,474.03
191,577.51
798,422.49
80.64
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
425,000,00
.00
.00
425,000.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
_....fmd`Sa�,„.
1,6,,,5,,
$2, Z5(
184 243,60 -
69.13
FUND TOTALS 2,094,800.00 74,428.51 312,263.85 1,782.536,15 85.09 %
POLICE I FIRE BLOG ONSTU
OTHER REVENUE ? oAug_ 10,508.44 48.578.52 51,,42, 48 51.42
FUND TOTALS 100,,000.00lojw4j,48,578j251,421,48 51.42 X
POLICE & FIRE 80ND PMGgEDS
OTHER REVENUE 75„,0�1Q, OO 10,975.60 �- ,1$ 8/Q 02 - x,120.98 30.82
FUND TOTALS 7a5m000..00 10,,975L,.Q 59.,02„ 2,,3. 1x0..98 30.82 X'
DOWNTOWN REQE-YLPMT CONST 1985
FEE REVENUE 16,500.00 1,500.00 6,000.00 10,500.00 63.63
OTHER REVENUE 2�¢QQ 00 382.38 x,'.218.49 381.51 14.67
FUND TOTALS 19,100.00 1,8„82.38- 8.2.W49 10,§x,51 56.97 %
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -O BUDGET PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 AMOUNT RECEIVED, RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE 10.000.00 663.59 4,045,29 x,954,71 59.54
FUND TOTALS 10,000.000 663.59 4,045,x„9 5,954.71 59.54 %
DOWNTOWN REDFVLPNT CONST 199
OTHER REVENUE 10.000.00 664,81 21810,34 7-189.66 71,89
FUND TOTALS 10, 000.0,0_ 664.81 - g.81,00.34 7,189,66 71.89 9
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
TAX REVENUE
8001000.00 87,997.93
177,043.23
622,956.77 77,86
OTHER REVENUE
901OW 00, 6,045.90
27,628.82
62,371,18 69.30
FUND TOTALS
8901000.00 94,043.83
204,672.05
685,327.95 77.00 X
FLOM CNR NT FU 1
OTHER REVENUE 50,000.00 9,053.4936,478.43 13,521.57 27.04
FUND TOTALS $0,000,00 9,053.49 . 3 478.43 13,521.57, 27.04 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 11973
TAX REVENUE
136,650.00
375.02
1,750.51
134,899.49
98.71
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
4,100.00
.00
.00
4,100.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
7,500.00
462.36
2,664.16
4,835,84
64.47
FUND TOTALS
148,250,00
837.38
4,414,x.67
143,835.33
97.02 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1974
TAX REVENUE
192,000.00
527.97
2,464.39
189,535.61
98.71
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
5,700.00
.00
.00
5,700.00
100.00
OTHER REVENUE
M000100
629.69
3,426.99
6,573.01
65.73
FUND TOTALS
207,70D.00 _
5,891.38
201,808.62
97.16 %
„,157.66
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
GSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I AMOUNT. RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE
TAX REVENUE 19,750.00 .00 66.07 19,683.93 99.66
OTHER REVENUE 2, 5? 000 129.98 575.11 1.674.89 74.43
FUND TOTALS 22,000.00 129,98 641,18 ----9LISS..-g 97.08 %
SS6 #2 RLACKHAWK I & I
TAX REVENUE 16,850.00 3.34 209.87 16,640.13 98.75
OTHER REVENUE 391,57 1.058.43 73.70
FUND TOTALS 19.100.00 141.47 801.44 18.298.56 95.80 %
POLICE & FIRE OLDS B & I 1991
TAX REVENUE 342,600.00 .00 .00 342,600.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 900.00 _...62 3 564.67 62.74
FUND TOTALS „343,500.00 62 �,3_3,5X 99.90 %
DOWNTOWN RFDEVLPNT 8 & 1 1991@
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 32.750,0D .00 15,868.75 j6.881.25 51.54
FUND TOTALS 32.750.00 .00 15,868J5, 16's1,,25, 51.54 %
FLOOD CONTROL 11991A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 375.500,00 .00 8?,260100 288.240.00 76.76
FUND TOTALS 375,$00 1 DO .OD 87.260100 288„2„4,0,00 76.76 %
DOWNTOWN RED NT 8 & 1 1987
TAX REVENUE 146,500.00 .00 .00 146,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 101000.00 22Q,41 _ I, 1�. _ MW64 85.38
FUND TOTALS 1,56,1500,��O_ 229.41 1, 661 M 15�5,QM.. ¢4_ 99.06 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
BUDGET REVENUE SUMMARY
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1987C
TAX REVENUE 78,500.00 .00 .00 78,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 115.00 .00 Do 115.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 78,615.00 .00 .00 71,5,00 100.00 X
EOLICE PENSION FUN
TAX REVENUE 89,000.00 '195.68 913.39 88,086.61 98.97
OTHER REVENUE 2.056.500.00 160,059.11 588 ,5(, 1.467.500.43 71.35
FUND TOTALS 2.145.500.00 16M554.79 589,91,2;,96 1,555 587 04 72.50 %
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
TAX REVENUE 38,000.00 75.67 353.18 37,646.82 99.07
OTHER REVENUE 2,272,000.00 194.477.53 706,04053 1,565,959.47 68.92
FUND TOTALS L310,.004-00 194,553.20 706.393.71 11 60� 69.42 X
CAPITAL IMPROVMENT 0 & I 1992A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 64,500.00 .00 .00 64,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 100.00, 8.97 44„;20 55.80 55.80
FUND TOTALS 64-600.00 8.97 44.20 64J,55.80 99.93 X
FLOOD.0 TR 992A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 110,300.00 .00 .00 110,300.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE X00_.16,41. 77.93... 122.07 61.03
FUND TOTALS 110,500.00 16,91 77,93 110.428.07 99.92 %
BUDGET
CUR MO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
P W FACILITY 8 & I 19878
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
TAX REVENUE
362,250.00
930.89
4,345.13
357,904.87
98.80
OTHER REVENUE
1
5,979,03
9,020.97
60.13
FUND TOTALS
377.250.00
2.565.32
10,324.16
366.925.84
97.26 X
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1987C
TAX REVENUE 78,500.00 .00 .00 78,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 115.00 .00 Do 115.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 78,615.00 .00 .00 71,5,00 100.00 X
EOLICE PENSION FUN
TAX REVENUE 89,000.00 '195.68 913.39 88,086.61 98.97
OTHER REVENUE 2.056.500.00 160,059.11 588 ,5(, 1.467.500.43 71.35
FUND TOTALS 2.145.500.00 16M554.79 589,91,2;,96 1,555 587 04 72.50 %
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
TAX REVENUE 38,000.00 75.67 353.18 37,646.82 99.07
OTHER REVENUE 2,272,000.00 194.477.53 706,04053 1,565,959.47 68.92
FUND TOTALS L310,.004-00 194,553.20 706.393.71 11 60� 69.42 X
CAPITAL IMPROVMENT 0 & I 1992A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 64,500.00 .00 .00 64,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 100.00, 8.97 44„;20 55.80 55.80
FUND TOTALS 64-600.00 8.97 44.20 64J,55.80 99.93 X
FLOOD.0 TR 992A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 110,300.00 .00 .00 110,300.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE X00_.16,41. 77.93... 122.07 61.03
FUND TOTALS 110,500.00 16,91 77,93 110.428.07 99.92 %
VILLAGE OF N 0 U N T PROSPECT
8 U 0 Q E T REVENUE SUMMARY
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR 140 Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPHT 8 & 1 19920 AMOUNT RECEIVED RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,650.00 .00 .00 9,650.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE .00 1.57 6,86 6,86- .00
FUND TOTALS 9.650.00 1.57 6.86 9,643.14 99.92 %
BSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT 8 & I
TAX REVENUE 32,300.00 3.25 207.23 32,092.77 99.135
OTHER REVENUE L000loo 48,05 233.55 766.45 76.64
FUND TOTALS 33,300,00 51,30 44 j
321859.22 98.67 %
TOTALS ALL FUNDS
43,531,520.00
2,427,582.60 .
9,556,880.69
33,974,639.31
78.04 %
LESS TRANSFERS
1,Q17JQQ.gg-
Do
103.,128.75-
914,571,25-
89.86 %
TOTAL REVENUES
4?,513,82OM,
2.427,582.60
33,060,069,06
77.76 %
REFUSEA FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 56,930.00 4,059.46 16,278.41 40,651.59 71.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,469,700.00 211,633.95 635,929.65 1,833,770.35 74.25
COMMODITIES 17.500.00 _ 00 - 5,49,84; 11.920.16 68.11
FUND TOTALS 2,,544,130,00, 215,693.41 657.787.90 1,886,342,10 74.14 %
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 66,000.00 4,991.25 20,574.38 45,425.62 68.82
COMMODITIES 75,000.00 .00 .00 75,000.00 100.00
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.0-g7,7joQ.gg 214,71,1„86 513,331.98 494,168.02 49.04
FUND TOTALS 1599,99 219,203.11 533,906.36 41.,4.,,19- 53.51 %
COMMUNITY QEVVGRANT
--NT BLOCK
V I L L A G E O F
M 0 U N T P
R O S P E C T
PERSONAL SERVICES
BUDGET EXPENDITURE
2,838.47
SUMMARY
35,070.27
75.01
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
4,003.99
4,177.91
38,672.09
90.24
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -O
BUDGET
PERCENT
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
PERSONAL SERVICES
11,553,510.00
839,071.84
3,460,623.94
8,092,886.06
70.04
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,862,325.00
347,522.59
1,267,471.75
2,594,853.25
67.18
COMMODITIES
796,415.00
43,424.95
179,216.79
617,198.21
77.49
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
229,855.00
471.49
11,864.47
217,990.53
94.83
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
21,795.00
.00
21,280.60
514.40
2.36
PENSION EXPENSE
10.600.00
883,22
3,532.88
7,067.12
66.67
FUND TOTALS
1,74
1.231.374.09
4.943,990.43
71.530.505.57
69.99 X
REFUSEA FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 56,930.00 4,059.46 16,278.41 40,651.59 71.40
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,469,700.00 211,633.95 635,929.65 1,833,770.35 74.25
COMMODITIES 17.500.00 _ 00 - 5,49,84; 11.920.16 68.11
FUND TOTALS 2,,544,130,00, 215,693.41 657.787.90 1,886,342,10 74.14 %
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 66,000.00 4,991.25 20,574.38 45,425.62 68.82
COMMODITIES 75,000.00 .00 .00 75,000.00 100.00
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.0-g7,7joQ.gg 214,71,1„86 513,331.98 494,168.02 49.04
FUND TOTALS 1599,99 219,203.11 533,906.36 41.,4.,,19- 53.51 %
COMMUNITY QEVVGRANT
--NT BLOCK
PERSONAL SERVICES
46,750.00
2,838.47
11,679.73
35,070.27
75.01
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
42,850.00
4,003.99
4,177.91
38,672.09
90.24
COMMODITIES
1,200.00
39.00
46.99
1,153.01
96.08
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
_ 10,5-1ggg gg_
2,,,4bi, Z5
N,,1999,50
154,900.50
83.68
FUND TOTALS �275,2M;QQ Q,45,2146.104,13 229,795,87 83.28 X
MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FU
PERSONAL SERVICES 7,,00 _5,7381, 19 2,37,580.27 545.254,73 69.65
FUND TOTALS 782,835.00 �5 ,7 38„1,19 237.580.27 _545�9544, 1 69.65 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
BENEFIT TRUST A2 AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
PENSION EXPENSE 26,000.00 _ 2,166.83 8.667.32 17,332.68 66,66
FUND TOTALS _ 26,000.00 2.166.83 8,667.32 17,332.68 66,66 X
LIBRARY FUND
LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2,870,425,00. . QL .0,0 _2,870,6„2.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,870,425.00 ,00 .00 2,870,425.00 100.00 %
WATER & SEWER F N
PERSONAL SERVICES.
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,250,230.00
95,209.24
377,349.81
872,880.19
69.81
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,045,700.00
332,316.87
1,302,023.68
2,743,676.32
67.81
COMMODITIES
351,200.00
30,956.5.9
113,573.51
237,626.49
67.66
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
396,800.00
13,830.60
45,277.77
351,522.23
88.58
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
601,925.00
,00
66,094.34
535,830.66
89.01
FUND TOTALS 6,645,855.00 472.313,30 1,904,319.11 4,741,,5,3 89 71.34 X
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUN
PERSONAL SERVICES.
24,110.00 1,803.84
7,153.12
16,956.88
70.33
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
62,900.00 4,304.63
23,720.88
39,179.12
62.28
COMMODITIES
5,800.00 31.24
977.32
4,822.68
83.14
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
11.000.00 .00
10,464.74
535.26
4.86
FUND TOTALS 103,810.00 6,139.71 42,31,06_ 61,493,94 59.23 X
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUN
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 50,415.00 3,493.36 177,776,78 638.?a2_ 69.52
FUND TOTALS 583,415.QD 3.49336 177,776.78 405,638.22 69.52 %
RISK MANAGEMENT FUN
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,512,000,00 98,162.28 568.102.26 1.".943 97.74 77.38
FUND TOTALS 2,512,000.00 90,j62,,28 568,102,26 1,94 897.74 77.38 %
V I L L A G E O F N 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M N A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
POLICE 4 FIRE CONST FUND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,830,285.00 „DO DO 1,830,285.00 100.00
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 4255 00 OO ,,DO 4255,000,,,00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,259,,?89 ,OQ .OD .00 2,255 15.00 100.00 X
POLICE I FIRPROCEED
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.122.215.00 3¢6.885.65 1 QR�1„Si��S_ 78 1,040,6T9.22 49.03
FUND TOTALS _2. 12,,,215, gg _ x§¢,885.65 11081.535,7„8 X676 9,22 49.03 X
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 250,000.00 1,188.75 2,590.72 247,409.28 98.96
INTERFUND 'TRANSFERS 32,750,00 .00 15,-1I J5 16.881.25 51.54
FUND TOTALS 282.750.00 1'1� 18,459.47 a64,290,53 93.47 X
IXWNTOWN REDEYLPHT T 1
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,s5Q5 ;;fes_ _ , OD 9,650.Q0_ 100.00
FUND TOTALS 91¢90.00 .p0 .00 4"650 M 100.00 X
FLOOD CONTROLCONST FUND 1
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80,000.00 1,295.40 1,895.40 78,104.60 97.63
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 390,000.00 15,091.40 157,579.61 232,420.39 59.59
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 485,,890.00 .00 87,260,00 _ 3n. 5ig, 00 82.03
FUND TOTALS 955.800.00 1�,�6.80 246,735.01 709.064.99 74.18 X
BUDGET
CUR NO
Y -T -D
BUDGET
PERCENT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
498,500.00
351.69
485,581.00
12,919.00
2.59
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1,310,960.00
51,533.92
83,099.60
1,227,860.40
93.66
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
64,500,00
�Do
.00
.64,500.00
100.00
FUND TOTALS
1,873,960,00
51.885.61_
560,00,60_
1 J0, 279,40
69.65 X
POLICE 4 FIRE CONST FUND
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,830,285.00 „DO DO 1,830,285.00 100.00
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 4255 00 OO ,,DO 4255,000,,,00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,259,,?89 ,OQ .OD .00 2,255 15.00 100.00 X
POLICE I FIRPROCEED
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.122.215.00 3¢6.885.65 1 QR�1„Si��S_ 78 1,040,6T9.22 49.03
FUND TOTALS _2. 12,,,215, gg _ x§¢,885.65 11081.535,7„8 X676 9,22 49.03 X
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 250,000.00 1,188.75 2,590.72 247,409.28 98.96
INTERFUND 'TRANSFERS 32,750,00 .00 15,-1I J5 16.881.25 51.54
FUND TOTALS 282.750.00 1'1� 18,459.47 a64,290,53 93.47 X
IXWNTOWN REDEYLPHT T 1
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 9,s5Q5 ;;fes_ _ , OD 9,650.Q0_ 100.00
FUND TOTALS 91¢90.00 .p0 .00 4"650 M 100.00 X
FLOOD CONTROLCONST FUND 1
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80,000.00 1,295.40 1,895.40 78,104.60 97.63
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 390,000.00 15,091.40 157,579.61 232,420.39 59.59
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 485,,890.00 .00 87,260,00 _ 3n. 5ig, 00 82.03
FUND TOTALS 955.800.00 1�,�6.80 246,735.01 709.064.99 74.18 X
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -O BUDGET PERCENT
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992 AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,850 (,100,00 232,470.90 27,2.470..90 3 61� 93.96
FUND TOTALS 3�1501Q- 0199 232,470.90 232,470.90 3,617,529.10 93.96 X
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 1 19 3
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1„,66.500.OQ .00 10,850.42 155.649.58 93.48
FUND TOTALS 166,500.00 O[I 10,850.42 155,¢49.58 93.48 %
CORPORATE197
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 245,400.00 .00 22,624.00 222,776.00 90.78
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS 8 & I
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 22,470.00 .00 4.235.00 18.235.00 81.15
FUND TOTALS 22.470.00 .00 4,235,00 18,,235.,00_ 81.15 %
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE _30, 00 QQ 2,900,00, 27.9W. 00 90.58
FUND TOTALS 30, wo:.- .00 2.900.00 R7.900, 00 90.58 X
POLICE & FIRE BLDG 0 & I 1991A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 244.455.00 .00 122.016.90 122.4,'58.10 50.08
FUND TOTALS 244,455.00 .00 192,016.90 122, JR. 19 50.08 X
DOWNTOWN V
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 32.750.00 .00 16.368.75 16,381.25 50.01
FUND TOTALS 32.750.00 .00 16.368.75 16,381.,25- 50.01 %
V I L L A 6 E 0 F N 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
FLOOD CONTROL B & I 1991A AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 375,500.00 .00 87,469.35 288'019,65 76.70
FUND TOTALS 3,75, , NO, 09 , QQ . 74"9,35, 288,030,65 76.70 %
DOWNTOWN R40F
. ,VLPMT 0 & 1 19870
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 114,375.00 ,005?,436.25 5 61930, , ? 5, 49.78
FUND TOTALS 1,14,375.0 � 00 561930 1 75
.0 57,436,25 49.78 %
P W FACILITY 8 & 1 19870
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE ___434.130.,.D0. .0089,507J4 344 .,OU 46 79.38
FUND TOTALS 434,130.00 DO12.59ZJ4 ,344.622.46 79.38 X
RMTOWN REDEVLPMT I & I 1987C
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 78,615.00 .00 111,807150 X80Z.50 84.98
FUND TOTALS 78,615,00 M 11'$M50 66,807.50 84.98 %
POLICE PENSION FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 333,500.00 33,350.00 100,050.00 233,450.00 70.00
PENSION EXPENSE ,54 M-gg 47,245&-6 173.585j0 394,414.70 69.43
FUND TOTALS 9011500100 80,595.06 _,„,,,627.0,64.70 69.64 %
MEMO'S PEtMIQM FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES 410,000.00 41,000.00 123,000.00 287,000.00 70.00
PENSION EXPENSE 605.000, DO 46.190.73 73_ 193,078,57 411,921,43 68.08
FUND TOTALS 87 190,73
31,6,0_7$.57 698_421.43 68.85 %
,,
CAPITAL IMPROYMENT 8 fi I 1992A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 68.500.00 DO 506,12 67.993.88
99.26
FUND, TOTALS 68.500.00 DO 506112 67,993,88 99.26 %
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D 6 S T EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5/01/92 - 8/31/92
BUDGET CUR NO Y -T -D BUDGET PERCENT
FLOOD CONTROL B & I 1992A AMOUNT EXPENDED EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 118,500.00 .00 �- -04 M 11177,653.95_ 99.28
FUND TOTALS 118,500.00 _100 846.05 117.653.95 99,28 %
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 10„,250.00 .00 578.92 9,671.08 94.35
FUND TOTALS 100 50;00 .00 578.92 9,671,08 94.35 X
SSA #6 G 0 A
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 33,650.00 .00 11.823.75 21.826.25, 64.86
FUND TOTALS 33.§50.00 00 1,1,823.7„5 - 2,1.826.25 64.86 X
TOTAL EXPENDITURES 49.209,425.00 3,51.875.99 12.297,116.80 36.912,308.20 75.01 %
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
FIRE PREVENTION WEEK
WHEREAS, unwanted fires cause untold property damage, injuries
and death due to careless and malicious acts; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Fire Department is striving to
educate and promote special emphasis on warning devices for the
elderly residents due to the fact that 5 of the 6 fire related
deaths in Mount Prospect during the past 15 years were senior
citizens; and
WHEREAS, of the fire related deaths throughout the State of
Illinois, 20% are children under the age of 5, emphasizing the
need to teach fire safety at the earliest possible age; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Fire Department works diligently
with the citizens who live, work and play in Mount Prospect to
reduce and eliminate the causes and conditions that produce
these horrible incidents; and
WHEREAS, due on a large part to the successful fire prevention
activities which produce a low incidence of fire, the Village of
Mount Prospect is one of the few communities in the State of
Illinois that has successfully obtained a CLASS II rating, being
one of the best fire ratings attainable, which rating reduces
the cost of insurance for both residential and commercial
properties; and
WHEREAS, we urge the citizens of Mount Prospect to continue to
actively support Fire Prevention by practicing various safety
measures, such as installing smoke detectors and planning fire
drills in their homes, so that every member of the family will
be familiar with an escape route should such an emergency arise.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the week of OCTOBER 4 - 11,
1992 as FIRE PREVENTION WEEK and urge the news media and other
public information agencies to cooperate in the promotion of
FIRE PREVENTION WEEK as a prelude to year-round fire prevention
efforts.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 15th day of September, 1992.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
ILI) I
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM IV
TO: Michael Janonis, Village Manager
FROM: Chuck Bencic, Inspection Services Director
DATE: September 2, 1992
RE: 709 Backberry - Ms. Gear
Attached find a memo from Jeff Wulbecker - Engineering Coordinator,
concerning the inspection done at 709 Hackberry. Ms. Gear was informed
of the results of the inspection.
Also attached is my original memo.and drawings on this subjec.t
Chuck Bencic
CB: rm
Attach.
cc: Engineering
File
VILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPUrr, n1JN01S 6M
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
FROM: Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering CoordinatorJA-1,Y—
DATE: September 1, 1992
SUBJECT: 709 Hackberry
Rear Yard Drainage
Project Engineer, Christine Van Dornick and myself met the subject property owner on site
and shot elevations along the rear property line. The rear property line drains from west
to east with an approximate 1' fall across the property. The rear yard in the property to the
east continues to slope to the east. At the southeast comer of the subject property a planter
area is located surrounded by a log border. The drainage complaint is that the subject rear
yard is wet. Visual observations today showed that the ground is damp. It has been three
days since the last rainfall. It appears that the planter area may restrict the outflow of water
off this property. We recommended that the planter border be removed and a swale
reestablished to allow water to runoff to the east. Also contributing to the ground wetness
is the fact that this area receives little drying action from the sun or wind due to the location
of nearby trees. it is my opinion that the sheds put in behind this property have not added
significantly to any drainage problem.
The subject property owner also had a complaint about her neighbors sump pump outlet
pipe. The property owner to the west has an outlet pipe which is pointed directly toward
the subject property. A notification of violation will be sent to this property owner
instructing them to redirect their outlet pipe toward the south property line.
JAW/m Ft 1,2 C41
ND
EP -2 992
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
INSPECTION SERVICE'S
Village,of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael Janonis, village Manager
FROM: Chuck Bancic, Director of Inspection Services
DATE: August 21, 1992
SUBJECT: 800 IRVwwm00
Per your request, the Engineering Division has reviewed our files for
information on the drainage and storm sewers in the area of 800 Ironwood Dr'
Attached.your will find:
1) The original grading plan for this area. This plan indicates the
proposed grading west of 800 Ironwood and 709 Hac4berry was to be
"drain through` lot grading. That is rain run-off from the rear
of the lots on Ironwood would flow north and "drain through" the
aide yards of the lots on Haokberrv' out to nuckberry Lane. The
lots from about 709 *ackberry and 708 Ironwood would drain east
down the rear lots of the houses on oackberry/Ironwood and then
through,the aide yards of lots facing Brentwood Ln'
2) Our aerial topo maps show the actual grading of the area to be rear
yard drainage. That is the run-off from the rear yard of both the
houses on Ironwood and *aokberry flows to the rear lot line, then
east along the rear lot line out to Brentwood Ln'
3) The storm sewer atlas shows there are storm sewers along both
Haokberry m Ironwood Lanes. The sewers begin about mid block
between Wheeling Rd' and Brentwood Ln' and yo east to Brentwood Ln.
There is also one sewer lateral that picks up rear yard drainage
at the mid block l000tion' We have confirmed that this rear yard
catch basin does exist.
Based on our aerial topo map, there is approximately a 75.000 sq. ft.
drainage area flowing along the rear lot line at 709 *aokberry' Although any
addition of impervious surface would 'add some additional run-off, I don't
believe the addition of impervious surface alone would cause o pending
problem within this drainage area.
40r�,6
Chuck Bencic
oe/bv
Att.
.� { •: tri ttx rt�: �� Wos � • /e� /os /sT is 1
a1 � A
fit tti tt# i tt'r ISO 12/ /22 t23 ,/2# ♦ tT2 ttf e 9 �T tO
e ♦ + t
# w iAt
la1
t!e l2v s /27 tas 1214 �T� 1T} tst
;.
1. 4 /fr € '#♦ {
1 f1! /!L /!T r!f H! /#O /1! /112.
* goo, /!e /TF
* : 1!#'
as raa i€
SEWEF�S
i
�€ e
€
0
..•
:
€.
€ s
a €
E R K£NSIA1070N
--
CAF
8/11/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 800 IRONWOOD DRIVE
WHEREAS, Roland H. Bracher (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 800 Ironwood Drive (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 182 in Brickman Manor First Addition, Unit #2, being
a subdivision of part of the West 1/2 of the Southwest
1/4 of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of
the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.102 to allow
a 240 square foot accessory structure, rather than the permitted
120 square feet; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 36-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 23rd day of July,
1992, after a continuation from the June 25, 1992 meeting, pursuant
to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prosgggt
Herald on the 9th day of June, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 36-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102 to allow an accessory structure 240 square feet
in size, as shown on the site plan attached hereto and hereby made
a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
L'
ZBA 36-V-92
Page 2 of 2
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
PM *3
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
J1lq7-
TO:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 25, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA42-A-92, AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a proposed amendment to Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. The proposed amendment
establishes a Special Use category for all non-residential uses in a single family area, such
as churches, schools and municipal facilities.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered this matter at their meeting of August 13, after
continuances from July 23 and June 25. At these meetings, Dave Clements and Ray
Forsythe from the Planning Department presented information on the proposed amendment.
Staff explained that this amendment was initiated by the Village Board as a result of a
house being converted into a church. The Village Board believed that a Special Use
category might be appropriate for this type of situation, in order to inform neighbors, and
to measure the impact of a non-residential use.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered several alternatives in order to address this
matter. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed a Special Use procedure for churches, and
a Special Use for the conversion of a house to a church. It was believed that it would not
be proper to single out churches for the Special Use procedure, when other non-residential
uses such as parks, schools and municipal buildings can have similar adverse impact on
neighbors as a church.
After discussion, the Zoning Board determined it was best to expand the scope of the
Special Use category as envisioned by the Village, and not just establish a Special Use for
churches.
Accordingly, by a 4-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Zoning
Ordinance be amended to create a Special Use category in all residential zoning districts
for any non-residential use, such as a church, school, park facility, library, museum or
municipal building.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
9/157
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONISS LLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA42-A-92, AMENDMENT TO ZONING ORDINANCE
Attached please find an ordinance for consideration as first reading at the September 15
Village Board meeting. This ordinance establishes a Special Use category for non-
residential uses in residential zoning districts, including uses such as schools, churches, parks
and municipal buildings, as recommended by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
As a result of discussion at the September 1 Village Board meeting, the ordinance addresses
circumstances of such a non-residential use in a dwelling unit. The ordinance requires a
Special Use permit for the conversion of a dwelling unit to a non-residential use, when such
non-residential use becomes the principal use of the structure. A principal use is defined
as "the main use of land, buildings or structures as distinguished from a subordinate or
accessory use building or structure."
With this definition, converting a dwelling into a museum, community center or church
would require a Special Use permit. The Special Use process would not be required when
the principal use remains a dwelling unit, and when a portion of the dwelling is occasionally
used for gatherings such as, meetings or worship.
DMC:hg
Attachment
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CERTAIN ARTICLES
OF CHAPTER 14, ZONING ORDINANCE,
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have filed an
application for certain text amendments to Chapter 14, 30, of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, in order to establish a Special Use procedure for non-residential uses in
residential zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks amendments to the following sections:
14.1001 R -X District 14.1301 R-2 District
14.1101 R-1 District 14.1401 R-3 District
14.1201 R -A District 14.1501 R4 District
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed amendments of ZBA Case No.
42-A-92 before the Zoning Board of Appeals on June �25, July 23, and August 13, 1992
pursuant to due and proper legal notice thereof published in the Mount Er,Herald
on the 9th day of June, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given
consideration to the specifics of ZBA-42-A-92.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as
findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Sections 14.1001.A, 14.1101.A, 14.1201.A, 14.1301.A, 14.1401.A,
and 14.1501.A are hereby amended by deleting the following permitted uses:
1. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school without dormitory
accommodations and having a curriculum equivalent to a public elementary or high
school;
2. Church;
3. Municipal building, park, library or museum buildings excluding commercial
enterprises therein; and
Adding the following wording as a Special Use to Sections 14.1001.C, 14.1101.C,
14.1201.1), 14.1301.0, 14.1401.0 and 14.1501.C:
1. Conversion of a residential dwelling unit to a non-residential use, when such non-
residential use serves as the principal use of the structure;
2. Public schools, elementary and high, or parochial school without dormitory
accommodations and having a curriculum equivalent to a public elementary or high
school;
3. Church;
4. Municipal building, park, library or museum buildings excluding commercial
enterprises therein; and
d
SECTION THREE That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as approved by law.
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 119
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields,
Village Clerk
-2-
Gerald L Farley,
Village President
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM un CrTY us,
TO; Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE; August 25, 1992
SUBJECT: Northwest Municipal Conference
Vehicle Auction
The Northwest Municipal Conference has asked that Mount Prospect
host their public vehicle auction this coming fall. As their
letter states, it will be on Saturday, October 17, 1992, start-
ing at 11:00 A.M. As the host of the auction, the Village will
not have to pay the auctioneer's fee or the Conference's time
for this event.
six Village vehicles will be declared surplus and available for
sale. Two of these are from the Police Department, two from
Public Works, one from the Fire Department, and one from the
administrative pool fleet.
I recommend, that the ordinance as submitted be brought before
the Village Board no later than September 1, 1992, with a Septem-
ber 15 second reading and final approval.
6,6� � " ed
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
AUCTN92M.EMO/FILES/ORGNZTN
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION OF
PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of
the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no
longer necessary or useful to or for the best interests of said.juris-
diction to retain ownership of the personal property hereinafter
described; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and the
Board of Trustees of the Village. of Mount Prospect to sell -said per-
sonal property at public auction.
now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD
OF TRUSTEES, OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT:
SECTION ONE: Pursuant of Section 11-76-4 of the Illi-
nois Municipal code, Illinois Revised Statutes, C24, Section 11-76-4,,
the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect find
that the following described personal property:
Village
Minimum
Serial No.
I.D. No.
Year
Make
Model
Value
1G1BN81Y7KA134541
P-13
1989
Chev.
Caprice Sta. Wgn
$ 500
IGIBN81Y8KA134886
P-16
1989
Chev.
Caprice Sta. Wgn
500
161BL6926FH135586
503
1985
Chev.
Impala Sedan
500
2HT,AA1859BCA16996
4518
1981
IH
1854 Dump Truck
1500
2HTAA1854BCA16999
4550
1981
IH
1854 Dump Truck
1500
1G1AD35P3EJ215415
309
1984
Chev.
Cavalier Sta. Wgn
500
now owned by said jurisdiction, are no longer necessary or useful to
the jurisdiction, and the best interests -of the jurisdiction would be
best served by its sale.
SECTION TWO; Pursuant to said Section 11-76-4, the
Village Manager is hereby authorized and.directed, to sell the afore-
mentioned personal property now owned by the Village of Mount Pros-
pect at public auction to the highest bidder at the time, date and
location as follows:
11:00 AM - Saturday, October 17, 1992
Mount Prospect Public Works Facility
1700 West Central Road.
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
SECTION THREE: The Village Manager is hereby author-
ized and may direct the Northwest Muni-cipal.Conference to advertise
the sale of the aforementioned personal property in a newspaper pub-
lished within the community before the date of said public auction.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Manager is hereby author-
ized and may direct the Northwest Municipal Conference to enter into
an agreement for the sale of said personal property. The Auction
shall be conducted in.the manner set forth in the specifications -for
the sale of vehicles attached hereto and made a part of this.ordi-
nance.
SECTION FIVE: No bid which is less than the minimum:
value set forth in list of property to be sold shall be accepted,
unless a lower amount is authorized by the village manager or his
representative at the auction.
SECTION SIX: Upon payment of the full auction price,
the Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to convey and
transfer title to the aforesaid personal property, to the successful
bidder.
SECTION SEVEN: This ordinance shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage, by a vote of at least three-
fourths of the corporate authorities and approval in the manner pro-
vided by law.
NAYS:
PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of 1 1992
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
AUCTION. INVENTORY FORM
Name: Public Works Department
Jurisdiction: Mount Prospect
Phone:708/870-5640
SERIAL NUMBER ID #
TYPE OF VEHICLE1
ear truck a ui
YEARI
MAKE
MODEL
MILEAGE
OF
DOORS
.TRANS.
auto/man
# OF
CLYND.1
AIR
COND.
t,INIMUii OTHER
RICE
COMMENTS
.1G1BN81Y7KA134541
P-13
Station Wagon
'89
kevroletj
Caprice 171,123
4
lAutomatilV8
Yes
$ 500
1G1BN81Y8KA134886
P-16
Station Wagon
'89
kevrolet
Caprice
67,756
4
lAutomaticV8
Yes
$ 500
i61BL6926FH135586
503
Sedan
'85
hevrolet
Impala
70,000
4
Automatic
V6
Yes
$ 500
A/C
Has
not working!
been repainted.
_
-2HTAA1859BCA16996.4518
Dump Truck
'81
IN,
185 4
32,100
2
utomati
6
No
$1504
Some
cab rust
2HTAA1854BCA16999
4550
Dump Truck
181
IN
1854
36,270
2
Automatic
'6
No
$1500
Some
cab rust
�1G1AD35P3EJ215415
309
Station Wagon
'84
Chevrolefl
Cavalier
53,400
4
hutomatic
4
Yes
500
3ody
has rust
J
.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND OTHER PUBLIC PROPERTY
IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITS CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM IN AND THROUGH THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THIS DAY OF , 19_
Published in Pamphlet Form
by Authority of the Board of Trustees
of the village of Mount Prospect,
Cook County, Illinois,
this day of , 19_.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY
TO USE THE PUBLIC WAYS AND OTHER PUBLIC PROPERTY
IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITS CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION AND
MAINTENANCE OF AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM IN AND THROUGH THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Be it ordained by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect, County of Cook, Illinois, as follows:
SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS
As used in this Ordinance, the following terms, phrases and
words and their derivations shall have the meanings given in this
Section, unless the context or use clearly indicates another or
different meaning is intended.
1.1 "Village" is the Village of Mount Prospect.
1.2 "Licensee" is the Commonwealth Edison Company.
1.3 "Clerk" is the Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect.
1.4 "Competent Authority" means and includes any governmental
body or forum vested by law with authority to do the act or
make the order, rule or regulation involved.
1.5 "Corporate Authorities" is the President and village
Board of the Village of Mount Prospect.
1.6 "Edison Representative" is the person or persons
designated by the Licensee to be responsible for the day-to-day
performance of the Licensee's duties under this Ordinance and
who shall be available and accessible to the Village for that
purpose during regular office hours.
- 2 -
1.7 "Edison Emergency Representative* is the person or
persons designated by the Licensee responsible for the
performance of the Licensee's duties under this Ordinance
during emergencies and at all times other than the Licensee's
regular office hours and who shall be available and accessible
to the village for that purpose during emergencies and at all
times other than the Licensee's regular office hours. The
Edison Representative may also, be designated as the Edison
Emergency Representative.
1.8 'Electric System" shall mean a system for the production,
transmission, distribution and sale of electricity for
lighting, heating, power and other purposes within and outside
the corporate limits of the Village.
1.9 "Energy Efficiency/DSM" means applications of
technologies and techniques for increasing the efficiency of
electric energy use or managing demand for electric energy.
Such applications may be designed to achieve greater end use
benefits from electric energy consumed, reductions in electric
energy consumption, shifts of electric energy demand to times
when it can be met more economically, or other initiatives
designed to manage or reduce demand for electric energy.
1.10 "FERC" means and refers to the Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission or other authority succeeding to the regulatory
powers of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.
1.11 "Generating Facilities" are those Facilities used or
constructed by the Licensee for the purpose of generating or
producing electric energy.
- 3 -
1.12 "High Voltage Transmission Lines* means power lines
designed to transmit electricity at 138 kilovolts (138 kv) or
more.
1.13 *ICC" means and refers to the Illinois Commerce
Commission or other authority succeeding to the regulatory
powers of the Illinois Commerce Commission.
1.14 "Liability" includes, but is not limited to: actual or
claimed loss or damage to property or injury to or death of
persons; actual or claimed responsibility for such loss,
damage, injury or death; and any and all judgments, decrees,
costs and expenses of every sort and kind incident to such
loss, damage, injury, death or responsibility, including, but
not limited to, court costs, fines and attorney's fees.
1.15 "Municipal Electric Representative" is the person or
persons designated by the Village to be responsible for the
day-to-day implementation of this Ordinance on behalf of the
Village during regular office hours.
1.16 "Municipal Emergency Electric Representative" is the
person or persons designated by the Village to be responsible
for the implementation of this Ordinance on behalf of the
Village during emergencies and at all times other than the
Village's regular office hours.
1.17 "Other Ways" means rights-of-way within the Village that
are under the jurisdiction and control of a governmental entity
other than the Village.
1.18 "Overhead Distribution Facilities" are poles, wires,
cables and other overhead apparatus used in the distribution
- 4 -
of electricity of not to exceed 14,000 volts.
1.19 "Overhead Facilities" are Transmission and Distribution
Utility Facilities located on or above the surface of the
ground, including the underground foundations or supports for
such facilities.
1.20 'Person* means one or more individuals, associations,
firms, partnerships, trusts, private corporations, municipal
corporations, receivers, or trustees.
1.21 *Public Property* means all real property and all
improvements thereon, owned, leased to, leased by or otherwise
controlled by the Village
1.22 *Public Ways" means the surface, the air space above the
surface and the area below the surface of any public
right-of-way, including, but not limited to, any street,
highway, avenue, drive, boulevard, lane, path, alley, sidewalk,
waterway, bridge, tunnel, park, parkway or other public
right-of-way including public utility easements or
rights-of-way over which the Village has jurisdiction, and any
temporary or permanent fixtures or improvements located thereon
now or hereafter held by the village in which the Village holds
rights sufficient, without consent of any other Person, to
permit Licensee the use thereof for the purpose of installing
or maintaining Licensee's Electric System.
1.23 "Transmission and Distribution Facilities* include all
lines, equipment and structures used in the transmission,
- 5 -
distribution or sale of electric energy, wherever located.
Transmission and Distribution Facilities include High Voltage
Transmission Lines.
1.24 "Underground Facilities" are Transmission and
Distribution Facilities located under the surface of the
ground, excluding the underground foundations or supports for
Overhead Facilities.
1.25 "Utility Facilities- are and refer to and include, but
are not limited to, property, land, structures, equipment,
plants, works, systems and improvements of the Licensee, such
as pipes, electric substations, conduits, wires, transformers,
cables, poles and meters, used in the production, transmission,
distribution or sale of electricity within the Village.
"Utility Facilities" includes all Generating Facilities,
Transmission and Distribution Facilities, Overhead Facilities
and Underground Facilities.
SECTION 2. RULES OF CONSTRUCTION
This Ordinance shall be construed in accordance with the
following provisions.
2.1 When not inconsistent with the context, words used in the
present tense include the future tense, words in the plural number
include the singular number, and words in the singular number
include the plural number.
2.2 The words "shall" and "will" are mandatory and the words
"may" is permissive.
— 6 —
2.3 The provisions of this Ordinance shall be read as a
whole so as to effect the purposes of this Ordinance.
2.4 Section headings are descriptive and used merely for the
purpose of organization. Where inconsistent with the text, section
headings are to be disregarded.
SECTION 3. RIGHTS GRANTED
3.1 Grant of Right tQ Use Public Ways and Public Pr9pqrty.
The Village hereby grants to the Licensee the right, permission and
authority to construct, operate and maintain in and through the
Village its Electric System and to construct, operate and maintain
all such Utility Facilities -as may be necessary or convenient for
such Electric System, in, upon, along, over, across, above and under
the Public Ways and Public Property in the Village, for the period
of time and upon the terms and conditions hereinafter specified.
3.2 Emraency-Access to Public Ways and Public Prgoerty.
In the event of an emergency which the Licensee reasonably
believes poses a threat of immediate harm to the public or to any of
the Utility Facilities, the Licensee is hereby granted access to the
Public Ways and Public Property, without a permit, to ameliorate the
threatened harm. The Licensee shall promptly advise the Village of
the emergency.
3.3 Exemotion From Parking Restrictions.
While used in the course of installation, repair and maintenance
work on the Utility Facilities, Licensee's vehicles shall be exempt
from parking restrictions of the Village.
- 7 -
SECTION 4. CONDITIONS OF GRANT
4.1 Constructign and Location of Facilities.
4.1.1 The Licensee or any Person acting on its behalf
may construct, repair, maintain, renew or replace Utility
Facilities located in the Public Ways, on Public Property, or
on Other ways, subject to the following conditions:
4.1.1.1 The Licensee shall obtain a permit in
accordance with the applicable ordinances of the Village.
The Licensee shall include with its permit application
such plans and schedules for restoration of the Public
Ways or Public Property as the village may require by
ordinance.
4.1.1.2 The Licensee shall obtain all necessary
approvals from any Competent Authority for the performance
of said work, and such work shall be performed in
accordance with the plans and specifications approved or
prescribed by Competent Authority.
4.1.1'.3 Except as provided in this Ordinance,
neither the Licensee nor any Person acting on its behalf
shall take any action or allow any action to be done which
may impair or damage the Public Ways, any property located
on the Public Ways, or the Public Property.
- 8 -
4.1.1.4 Neither the Licensee nor any person acting
on its behalf may interfere unreasonably with the use of
the Public Ways or Public Property by the general public
or by other Persons authorized to use or be present upon
said Public Ways or Public Property.
4.1.1.5 The Licensee shall provide reasonable notice
to the Village before beginning any work in Other Ways
within the Village.
4.1.1.6 To the extent practicable, the Licensee
shall notify the Village of plans to undertake any
construction, repair, maintenance or replacement of
Utility Facilities in conjunction with the annual planning
meeting provided for in Section 7.8. This notice shall be
in addition to any other notice requirements imposed by
other applicable ordinances. The notice requirements of
this paragraph do not apply to the installation of lateral
service connections to individual customers.
4.1.1.7 In the event of an emergency, if prior
acquisition of formal authorization is not possible, the
Licensee or any Person acting on its behalf may undertake
the work described above without first acquiring formal
authorization, provided that the Licensee uses its best
efforts to contact the Municipal Emergency Electric
Representative prior to performing such work and provided
further that,the Licensee shall apply for such formal
authorization at the earliest reasonable opportunity.
- 9 -
4.1.2 All Transmission and Distribution Facilities
erected hereunder shall be placed in alleys wherever
practicable so to do, and shall be so placed, wherever located,
so as not to interfere unnecessarily with travel on or access
to the Public ways.
4.1.3 Unless specifically permitted by the Village, all
Utility Facilities erected under this Ordinance shall be
located so as not to injure any drains, sewers, catch basins,
water pipes, pavements or other public improvements.
4.1.4 All poles shall be of sufficient length to be
anchored substantially in the ground and to extend to a height
of at least 25 feet above the surface. Poles shall be
adequately braced wherever necessary.
4.1.5 All wires, conductors, transformers and other
apparatus that are attached to utility poles shall be at a
sufficient height to preclude interference with free use of the
Public Ways.
4.1.6 Prior to filing any application with a Competent
Authority for the construction of any Generating Facilities or
High-voltage Transmission Lines within the corporate limits of
the village, the Licensee shall meet with the Village to
discuss such plans.
4.1.7 Any Utility Facilities in the Public Ways that
have been, or are at any future time acquired, leased or
- 10 -
utilized in any manner by the Licensee are thereupon to be
deemed authorized by and shall be subject to all the provisions
of this Ordinance.
4.1.8 Except as otherwise provided herein, the Licensee
shall not be required to change the location, the height above,
or the depth below the Public Ways of those Utility Facilities
in place as of the effective date of this Ordinance.
4.2 Relocation or Remgval of Facilities.
4.2.1 Upon receiving at least 30 days notice from the
Village, the Licensee shall, at its own expense, temporarily or
permanently remove, relocate, change or alter the position of
any Utility Facilities in Public Ways or Public Property
whenever the Corporate Authorities shall have determined that
such removal, relocation, change or alteration: (1) is
reasonably necessary for the construction, repair, maintenance,
improvement or use of such Public Ways or Public Property; (2)
is reasonably necessary for the location, construction,
replacement, maintenance, improvement or use of other Property
of the Village; or (3) is reasonably necessary for the
operations of the Village. The Village agrees to engineer the
projects in the Public Ways or Public Property either so as not
to require any such removal, relocation, change or alteration
or, if that is not reasonably feasible, so as to minimize the
Licensee's expenses in making such removals, changes or
alterations. The Licensee will not be responsible for the
expense of removals, relocations, changes or alterations
required by the Village primarily for the purpose of assisting
either private projects or a municipal electric utility.
4.2.2 whenever it shall be necessary for the village or
any other Person to move along or across the Public Ways, any
vehicle, equipment, structure or other object of such height or
size as will interfere with any of the Licensee's Overhead
Facilities, the Licensee shall temporarily remove such Overhead
Facilities from such place as must necessarily be crossed by
such vehicle, equipment, structure or other object, provided
that: (1) the Licensee shall receive at least 24 hours notice
thereof from the Village Electric Representative; (2) the
Licensee shall have received payment for such removal, where
payment is required; and (3) such temporary removal shall be
done at such time of the day or night as will least interfere
with the Licensee's use of such wires and poles for the benefit
of the inhabitants of the Village and the successful operation
of the Licensee's Electric System. It is understood that the
Licensee shall bear the expense of any such temporary removals
for projects being undertaken by or for the benefit of the
Village or its agent and that the expense of all other such
temporary removals shall be borne by the Person requesting such
removal. All questions as to the time when any of said wires
and poles shall be so cut, removed or adjusted for the purpose
aforesaid shall be decided by the Municipal Electric
Representative, and such decision shall be final.
4.3 Restoration of Public Ways pr Public Propert
4.3.1 When the Licensee, or any Person acting on its
behalf, does any work in or affecting the Public Ways or Public
Property, it shall, at its own expense, remove any obstructions
therefrom and restore such Public Ways or Public Property to as
good a condition as existed before the work was undertaken,
unless otherwise directed by the Village.
4.3.2 If weather or other conditions do not permit the
complete restoration required by this paragraph, the Licensee
may temporarily restore the affected Public Ways or Public
Property upon receiving the approval of the Village Electric
Representative, provided that such approval shall not be
unreasonably withheld. Such temporary restoration shall be at
the Licensee's sole expense and the Licensee shall promptly
undertake and complete the required permanent restoration when
the weather or other conditions no longer prevent such
permanent restoration.
4.3.3 Upon the request of the village, the Licensee
shall restore the Public Ways or Public Property to a better
condition than existed before the work was undertaken, provided
that the Village shall bear any additional costs of such
restoration.
4.3.4 If the Licensee fails to restore the Public Ways
or Public Property or to remove any obstruction therefrom, as
- 13 -
required by this paragraph, the Village may, after
communications with the Edison Representative and after
affording the Licensee a reasonable opportunity to correct the
situation, give seven days written notice to the Licensee, and
thereafter restore such Public Ways or Public Property or
remove the obstruction therefrom. No such prior written notice
shall be required in the event that the Village determines that
an emergency situation exists. The Licensee shall pay the
Village for any such restoration or removal within 14 days
after receiving a bill from the Village for such work.
4.4 TriMing gf Trees and Vegetatign. From time -to -time,
when the Licensee believes it to be warranted by existing
conditions, the Licensee shall, at its own expense, cause the trees
and vegetation growing upon or overhanging any of the Public Ways or
Public Property in the Village where Utility Facilities are erected
to be trimmed in such a manner that there shall be a proper
clearance between the nearest wires or equipment and any portion of
the trees or vegetation. The trees and vegetation shall be trimmed
so that no branches, twigs or leaves come in contact with or in.any
way interfere with the Utility Facilities. The Licensee shall
notify the Village Electric Representative no less than seven days
before it plans to perform such work. The Village Electric
Representative shall approve the time, place and manner of
performing such work.
me=
4.5 Tree Location Prggrgm.
4.5.1 Tree Removal and Replacement. The Licensee and
the Village agree to develop a cooperative program for the
removal and replacement of certain municipally owned trees
located in the Public Ways or on Public Property which conflict
or potentially conflict with the Overhead Facilities. The
trees to be removed and replaced shall be designated by the
Village after consultation with the Edison Representative.
Within 30 days after receipt of a written notice from the
Village of trees to be removed, the Licensee shall schedule a
removal date acceptable to the Village, and shall remove the
designated trees and dispose of all tree brush except that the
Village shall dispose of all stumps and logs over four inches
in diameter. The Village shall purchase, plant and maintain
all trees planted pursuant to the tree removal and replacement
program, and the Licensee shall reimburse the Village for
one-half of the Village's cost of tree replacement, up to a
maximum amount of $125 per tree.' The reimbursement shall be
made to the Village within 60 days after the Licensee's receipt
of a written request for reimbursement.
4.5.2 Tree Selection. The Village agrees to implement
a policy for the purpose of regulating tree planting on the
Public Ways or Public Properties so as to allow only such
low -growing trees species as will not attain a mature height
that will conflict with primary electrical lines and thereby
- 15 -
require line clearance maintenance. Such policy shall not
preclude planting upright, columnar or pyramidal shaped trees
to the side of power lines, thereby avoiding the need for
severe and disfiguring line clearance tree trimming.
4.5.3 Treg Location. The Village agrees that it will
attempt to locate new trees and other new vegetation on the
Public Ways and Public Property so as to minimize contact with
Utility Facilities.
4.5.4 pUratign gf Progrg . The Tree Location Program
provided for in the foregoing paragraphs shall remain in effect
for the first 10 years of this Agreement, after which it shall
be renewed on terms that are mutually agreeable.
4.6 Use of Utility Facilities. The Licensee shall, when
requested by the Village, (1) permit its Overhead Facilities to be
used for the suspension and maintenance of wires and (2) permit its
Underground Facilities to be used for the running and maintenance of
wires, both as may be reasonably required either by the Village or
by other Persons holding a•valid municipal license or other valid
authorization to use the Public Ways or Public Property. Except as
provided in the following sentence, the Village shall be entitled to
make such use without charge. Such use by other Persons, and such
use by the Village for a proprietary purpose, shall be subject to
such terms and conditions, including fees, as the Licensee may
reasonably require. Such use of the Utility Facilities shall be
under the supervision and direction of the Licensee so as not to
materially interfere with the Licensee's present or reasonably
- 16 -
contemplated usage of the utility Facilities. Such use may not be
for the purpose of allowing any Person to transmit or distribute
electricity. The Village agrees to save and keep harmless the
Licensee from any and all liability incurred by the Licensee as a
result of the Village's use of the Utility Facilities pursuant to
this paragraph. In no event shall the village be responsible for
liability incurred by the Licensee as a result of the use of the
Utility Facilities by other Persons.
4.7 Removal of Facilities. The Licensee shall promptly
remove from the Public Ways and Public Property all above ground
wires and the supports therefor whose use is abandoned and shall
either promptly remove or board up or render reasonably unaccessible
all other Utility Facilities whose use is abandoned or
discontinued. The Licensee shall take reasonable steps to prevent
any such non-removed Utility Facilities from becoming nuisances.
4.8 Underaroundina of Facilities. The Licensee will
relocate its Overhead Distribution Facilities in or on Public Ways
and Public Property in the Village, other than alleys, by placing
the Overhead Distribution Facilities underground, or rerouting them
if necessary, if so requested by the Village. The Overhead
Distribution Facilities to be placed underground or rerouted shall
not exceed 500 feet annually and will be determined by.the mutual
agreement of the Licensee and the Village; the agreement of the
Licensee will not be unreasonably withheld. Scheduling of the
requested work to be performed will be in accordance with the
Licensee's normal work scheduling practices. The total cost for
- 17 -
such work including, but not limited to, material, labor and
overhead shall not exceed .40 percent of the revenues collected by
the Licensee in the prior calendar year for electric service in the
Village; except that if, on or before November 15, 1991, the
Licensee had made a written offer to the Village to underground its
Overhead Distribution Facilities at the rate of either 500 feet
annually or 2,500 feet every five years, then the cost of such work
shall not be subject to the foregoing limitation. The number of
feet available to be undergrounded or rerouted in any year which are
not utilized may be carried forward for utilization in future years.
SECTION 5. SERVICE CONSIDERATIONS
5.1 Adequate Supply of Poweg. The Licensee shall at all
times take all reasonable and necessary steps to assure an adequate
supply of electricity to its customers within the Village at the
lowest reasonable cost consistent with long term reliable supplies.
The Licensee shall from time -to -time make such enlargements and
extensions of its Facilities as are necessary to adequately provide
for the requirements of the Village and its residents.
5.2 Pluty to Provide Electricity. The Licensee shall furnish
electricity within the corporate limits of the Village to the
Village and to the inhabitants thereof, and to any person or persons
or corporation doing business in the village. All such electricity
shall be furnished at the rates and under the terms and conditions
as provided from time -to -time by the ICC.
- 18 -
5.3 Ngnd� �ina 'on. The Licensee shall not, as to rates,
charges, service, facilities, rules, regulation or in any other
respect, make or grant any preference or advantages to any
corporation or person or subject any Person to any prejudice or
disadvantage; provided that nothing in this grant shall be taken to
prohibit the establishment from time -to -time of graduated scales of
charges and classified rate schedules to which any customer coming
within an established classification would be entitled.
5.4 KgintgnanCe-jqf F�— s -
5.4.1 All Utility Facilities shall be maintained in good
condition.
5.4.2 All Utility Facilities shall be maintained in
such a manner that they do not create hazardous conditions for
the Public Ways or Public Property.
5.5 Service InterruRtions.
5.5.1 The Licensee shall make all reasonable efforts to
prevent power surges and interruptions of service. When power
surges or interruptions occur, the Licensee shall reestablish
service with the shortest possible delay consistent with
general safety and public welfare.
5.5.2 The Licensee shall make all reasonable efforts to
notify the Municipal Electric Representative or the Municipal
Emergency Electric Representative of major service
interruptions within the village within one hour after the
Licensee learns of such interruption. If, at the time such
notification is made, the Licensee is not able to provide an
- 19 -
estimate of when service is expected to be restored, such
information shall be provided to the Municipal Electric
Representative or the Municipal Emergency Representative as it
becomes available. A major service interruption is defined
as: (1) an outage with an interrupted load of greater than
1,000 KVA and persisting for 15 minutes or more; or (2) any
outage with a significant impact, as such term may be defined
by agreement between the Village and the Edison Representative,
lasting 15 minutes or more.
5.5.3 No less than 24 hours prior to beginning
scheduled maintenance, scheduled repairs or other scheduled
work on its Utility Facilities that may result in an
interruption of electric service to customers in the village,
the Licensee shall make a good faith effort to provide written
notice to potentially affected customers and to the Municipal
Electric Representative of the scheduled time and estimated
duration of the work. The Licensee shall make a good faith
effort to notify potentially affected customers and the
Municipal Electric Representative prior to performing any
emergency work on its Utility Facilities that may result in an
interruption of electric service to customers in the Village.
5.5.4 The Licensee shall keep records of interruptions
affecting service within the Village. An interruption will be
considered as a failure of any portion of the system or
equipment whereby.the voltage is reduced to less than 50
percent of the standard voltage for a period longer than one
- 20 -
minute, except that where automatic reclosing equipment is used
only "circuit breaker lockout" shall be so considered, unless
the ICC promulgates a rule or regulation setting forth a
different standard for defining an interruption; provided that
the Licensee shall notify the Village of any docket opened by
any Competent Authority that would change the standard, and
provided further that the standard set forth herein shall
remain in effect if the Competent Authority sets no standard by
rule or regulation. The record shall show the date, time of
day, duration, extent and cause of the interruption.
5.5.5 The Licensee shall also maintain records showing
the average customer outage frequency and duration both within
the Village and for the Licensee's system as a whole.
5.5.6 Upon the request of the Village, but no less than
once a year, the Licensee shall provide the Village with
reports providing the information contained in the.records
maintained pursuant to Sections 5.5.4 and 5.5.5.
5.5.7 On October 23, 1991, the Licensee filed with the
ICC the rider set forth in Exhibit A hereto to provide for a
service policy allowing customers whose electric service is
interrupted because of an operating error or equipment
malfunction for twelve or more consecutive hours to receive a
credit against the monthly customer charge.
- 21 -
SECTION 6. ECONOMIC AND TECHNOLOGICAL PROVISIONS
6.1 Technological Advances. The Licensee shall investigate,
develop and incorporate technological advances into its equipment
and service in its sole discretion and subject to order of Competent
Authority. Upon the request of the Village, the Licensee shall
discuss such technological advances at the annual meeting provided
in Section 7.8.
6.2 Cggepprgtign gnd Small Power Pr Flitieg. The
Licensee shall provide, on a timely basis, such information as may
reasonably be required for interconnection with the Licensee's
system by the Village, if the Village desires to develop a
Qualifying Facility, and by any Person doing business in the Village
that desires to develop a Qualifying Facility related to its
business in the Village. A Qualifying Facility is a cogeneration
facility or small power production facility which meets the criteria
for qualification set forth in subpart B of 18 C.F.R. 292, as it may
be amended from time -to -time.
6.3 Demand Side Management. The Licensee shall make
systemwide expenditures in connection with the least cost planning
process of $25,000,000 through 1996 in furtherance of its
recognition of the Village's strong commitment to energy
conservation and compliance by the Licensee with the least cost
planning provisions of the Public Utilities Act. In addition, to
the extent that Energy Efficiency/DSM programs are identified during
the five year period described above that are cost justified in the
good faith judgment of the Licensee, the Licensee shall expend
at least an additional $25,000,000 in the implementation of such
programs. The Licensee shall implement cost-effective Energy
Efficiency/DSM programs, consistent with the Licensee's least cost
planning requirements as an integral part of the Licensee's
provision of electricity to its customers. Examples of programs
which the Licensee will consider for its Energy Efficiency/DSM
program are home weatherization and the maintenance of appliances
and air-conditioning systems at peak efficiency. The Licensee shall
be required to implement only those Energy Efficiency/DSM programs
that are approved by the ICC and for which the Licensee can recover
from its customers (i) program costs, (ii) offsets for lost revenue
and stranded investment (if any) resulting from such program and
(iii) any appropriate return to the Licensee on such costs, lost
revenues and stranded investments, as approved by the ICC. The
Licensee shall provide the Village with notice of the specifics of
the Energy Efficiency/DSM programs within two business days of the
ICC's acceptance of the Licensee's proposal for filing.
6.4 Environmental Protection. The Licensee shall make such
efforts as it deems necessary to meetthestandards required for its
Utility Facilities in the Village to meet applicable federal and
state air and water pollution laws. Upon the request of the
Village, the Licensee shall discuss such environmental matters at
the annual meeting provided for in Section 7.9.
6.5 Economic Sources of Power. As part of its provision of
electricity to the Village, the Licensee shall take efforts to
obtain electric power from sources other than its Electric System,
- 23 -
when it considers obtaining such power to be cost effective and as
may be required by 83 Ill. Admin. Code, Part 430, as it may be
amended from time -to -time. In connection therewith, the Licensee
shall make such adjustments to its rates as required by the ICC.
SECTION 7. ADMINISTRATION
7.1 Representatives.
7.1.1 The Licensee agrees to maintain such local offices
and facilities as it deems adequate for the purposes of
providing repair and maintenance services and personnel
available during office hours to address concerns the village
might have regarding the provision of electric service and the
administration of this Ordinance. The Licensee shall provide
the Village with the Location and telephone number of the local
office and the name and telephone number of the Edison
Representative.
7.1.2 The Licensee further agrees to maintain such
local offices and facilities as it deems adequate for the
purposes of providing the Village with 24-hour emergency
service pertaining to the operation of the Utility Facilities.
The Licensee shall provide the Village with the location and
telephone number of the local office, the name of the Edison
Emergency Representative and the telephone number or numbers at
which the Edison Emergency Representative can be reached 24
hours a day.
- 24 -
7.1.3 The Village agrees to provide the Licensee with
the'name of the Municipal Electric Representative and the
telephone number or numbers at which the Municipal Electric
Representative can be reached during office hours.
7.1.4 The Village agrees to provide the Licensee with
the name of the Municipal Emergency Electric Representative and
the telephone number or numbers at which the Municipal
Emergency Electric Representative can be reached 24 hours a day.
7.1.5 The Village and the Licensee agree that each one
will promptly notify the other party in the event that any of
the information required under the foregoing sections is
changed, so as to keep such information current at all times
while this Ordinance remains in effect.
7.2 Facilities Maps. Upon the request of the Village, the
Licensee shall provide the Village with a current map or set of
maps, showing the location of all Utility Facilities installed in or
under Public Ways within the corporate limits of the Village
provided that the Licensee shall not be required to prepare new maps
to comply with this provision if no such maps exist.
7.3 Duty to Provide Information. The Licensee shall, from
time -to -time, furnish such additional information as the Village may
reasonably deem to be necessary to enable it to determine whether
the Licensee is complying or has complied with the provisions of
this Ordinance, other than those matters subject to the exclusive
jurisdiction of a Competent Authority other than the Village. The
Licensee shall not be required to provide information as to which it
has a legal privilege to refuse to provide.
- 25 -
7.4 Disclosures of Documents. or 1pfogmatio . The Village
agrees that no documents or information provided to the Village by
the Licensee in accordance with this Ordinance shall be made
available to the public if such documents or information are exempt
from disclosure under the provisions of the Freedom of Information
Act or Section 5-108 of the Public Utilities Act, as such statutes
may be amended from time -to -time.
7.5 Inspection of Facilitigg. The Licensee shall permit the
village, at reasonable times and upon reasonable notice, to inspect
the Utility Facilities within the corporate boundaries of the
Village so as to determine whether the Licensee is complying or has
complied with the provisions of this Ordinance, other than those
matters subject to the exclusive jurisdiction of a Competent
Authority other than the Village.
7.6 Superintendent Qf Public Works. The Superintendent of
Public Works, or such other person as the Corporate Authorities may
designate from time -to -time, is hereby designated the official of
the Village having full power and authority to take appropriate
action for and on behalf of the village to administer and enforce
the provisions of this Ordinance and to investigate any alleged
violations or failures of the Licensee to comply with the provisions
hereof or to adequately and fully discharge its responsibilities and
obligations hereunder.
7.7 Notices.
7.7.1 Noticg to Villagg. Unless otherwise specified
herein, all notices from the Licensee to the Village under
- 26 -
this ordinance shall be made in writing and delivered to the
Village Manager at the following address:
Mr. John Dixon
Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
7.7.2 Ngtice to the Licensee. Unless otherwise
specified herein, all notices from the Village under this
ordinance shall be made in writing and delivered to Ms. Kathryn
Houtsma, Director, Regulatory Affairs, at the following address:
Ms. Kathryn Houtsma
Director, Regulatory Affairs
Commonwealth Edison Company
P. O. Box 767
Chicago, IL 60690-0767
7.7.3 Chanues in Person or Place for Notification. In
the event that either the Village or Licensee changes the
person to whom written notices are to be directed or the
address to which such notices are to be sent, the party making
the change shall promptly notify the other party of such change
in writing.
7.7.4 All notices shall be effective upon their receipt
by the person or persons to whom they are directed.
and the Village agree to exercise their best efforts to coordinate
to the extent practicable the timing of construction activities of
each so as to minimize any public inconvenience that might
otherwise occur. In conjunction with this goal, shortly after
January 1 of each year, as agreed by the parties, the Licensee shall
meet with the Village and such other users of the Public Ways as may
be invited by the Village to discuss scheduling of construction in
the Public Ways in that calendar year.
7.9 Annual Meeting. No less than once a year, the Licensee
shall attend a meeting of the Corporate Authorities to provide a
status report of the Licensee's activities within the Village during
the previous year, to outline its planned activities for the next
year, and to answer questions the Corporate Authorities may have
regarding the Licensee's performance under this Ordinance.
7.10 Notice of Boundary Chances. The village agrees to
notify the Licensee in writing of any ordinance, statute or court or
administrative action that causes a change in the Village's
boundaries. Failure to give such notice excuses the Licensee both
from non-compliance with this Ordinance and from the non -collection
of municipal utility taxes within the area affected until such
notice is given.
7.11 Notice of Regulatory Changes. In the event that either
the ICC or the FERC opens a docket or proposes an administrative
rule that 1) would directly affect the Licensee and 2) would, in the
Licensee's opinion, be inconsistent with or change any provision of
or duty under this Ordinance, the Licensee, within seven days of
determining such inconsistency, shall notify the Village of such
docket or proposed rule and what it thinks is the inconsistency.
The Licensee shall make a good faith effort to make such
- 28 -
determination and to give such notice prior to the expiration of any
intervention period or comment period.
7.12 Notice of Actions Before Competent Autboritie In
the event that the Licensee becomes a party to any proceedings of a
Competent Authority that 1) would directly affect the Licensee and
2) would, in the Licensee's opinion, be inconsistent with or change
any provision of or duty under this Ordinance, the Licensee, within
seven days of determining such inconsistency, shall notify the
Village of such proceeding and what it thinks is the inconsistency.
The Licensee shall make a good faith effort to make such
determination and to give such notice prior to the expiration of any
intervention period or comment period.
7.13 Notice of Reciuests for Rate Changes. The Licensee
shall notify the Village of any applications the Licensee may make
to the ICC to effectuate any change in its rates, including the
riders thereto. The notice shall be made in accordance with the
notice provisions of this Ordinance, and shall be sent no later than
two business days following the date on which the rate application
is accepted for filing by the ICC. For each rate or charge affected
by the application, the notice shall contain a statement of the
existing rates or charges and all proposed rates or charges. If the
proposed rates or charges are to be phased in over a period of time,
the notice shall also contain a statement of the proposed rates or
charges for each increment and the time period each incremental
increase is to be in effect. Upon the written request of the
Village, the Licensee shall send the Village a copy of the complete
application filed with the ICC. This provision shall not apply to
applications filed solely for the purpose of effectuating municipal
utility taxes.
SECTION 8. COMPENSATION
8.1 MuniciDal Compensation. The Licensee will during each
calendar year throughout the life of the Ordinance, supply without
charge to the Village such an amount of electric energy as may be
reasonably necessary for: (1) lighting and various other uses in
municipal buildings solely occupied for municipal purposes and not
for purposes of revenue (or such part thereof as may from
time -to -time be so occupied) as may be identified as eligible for
such electric energy by the parties; (2) traffic signals. The
foregoing arrangement shall be effective beginning with readings
made after the date hereof of meters measuring electric energy for
the above purposes at locations set forth in Exhibit B hereto.
Exhibit B shall be amended from time -to -time during the term of this
Ordinance so as to maintain a current list of the locations and
traffic signals eligible to receive service under the terms of this
section. None of said electric energy so to be supplied without
charge to the Village shall be used by the Village for heating,
street lighting, water pumping or other such power purposes. Nor
shall any of said energy be resold for any purpose whatsoever.
- 30 -
8.2 wgiver of !Certain Fees and Charges. The consideration
provided to the Village by this Ordinance shall be in lieu of: (1)
any permit, license, inspection or other similar fees or charges
imposed by the Village upon Persons for use of the Public Ways; or
(2) any permit or license fee imposed by the Village upon any
Persons for the operation of a business similar to that conducted by
the Licensee.
SECTION 9. MUNICIPAL RIGHTS RESERVED
9.1 Police Powers. The Village expressly reserves the right
to adopt, from time -to -time, in addition to the provisions contained
herein, such ordinances, rules and regulations as the Corporate
Authorities may deem necessary in the exercise of the police power
for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the
Village's citizens and their properties.
Village expressly reserves the right to enforce reasonable
regulations concerning access to or use of the Public Ways or Public
Property, as may from time -to -time beprovidedby ordinance,
including requirements for permit applications.
KFUE16-1 M-�
9.3.1 Purchase. At any time while this Ordinance
remains in effect, upon written notice from the village to the
Licensee, the village may offer to purchase from the Licensee
any or all of the Utility Facilities located within the
Village, or any lesser interest thereof, free and clear of all
mortgages and other liens in any manner provided for by law.
- 31 -
9.3.2 Cgndemnatio . Nothing herein shall be deemed or
construed to impair or affect, in any way or to any extent, the
right of the Village to acquire the property of the Licensee,
either by purchase or through the exercise of the right of
eminent domain, and nothing herein contained shall be construed
to contract away or to modify or abridge, either for a term or
in perpetuity, the village's right of eminent domain.
9.3.3 Continuation of Service. In the event the
Village takes any action pursuant to this Section 9.3, the
Licensee agrees that it shall continue to supply electric
service within the Village and shall continue to comply with
the provisions of this Ordinance until the acquisition of the
Utility Facilities has been finalized and the ICC has
authorized the Licensee to discontinue service within the
Village.
9.4 NQn-Exclusivegrant.
9.4.1 Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to
grant the Licensee an exclusive franchise to operate within the
corporate limits of the Village.
9.4.2 The village reserves the right to make a similar
use or grant a similar use in the Public Ways to any other
Person.
9.4.3 The Village agrees to require all other
contractors, subcontractors, franchisees, licensees and
permittees in the Public Ways not to interfere unreasonably
with the rights of the Licensee in the Public Ways.
- 32 -
9.5 Right to
,Compete with Licensee. Nothing in this
Ordinance shall be construed as a waiver of the Village's
rights to own and operate an electric utility in competition
with the Licensee or to acquire any or all of the Licensee's
Utility Facilities in such manner as may from time -to -time be
provided by law.
9.6 Small Powgr Production apd Coceneratio . The Village
expressly reserves the right to engage in the production of
electric energy, both from conventional power plants and from
cogeneration and small power production facilities.
SECTION 10. TERM AND TERMINATION
10.1 Term. The franchise granted by this ordinance shall
last for a term of 60 years from its effective date, except that, at
the sole option of the Village, it may be terminated at the end of
the 15th year prior to the year in which it would otherwise
terminate, provided that the village notifies Edison in writing of
its intent to terminate within the first three months of the 15th
prior year.
10.2 Acceptance. The Licensee shall accept this Ordinance,
by filing with the Clerk an unconditional written acceptance hereof,
to be duly executed according to law, along with proof of compliance
required by Sections 14.2 and 14.3. The failure of the Licensee to
so accept this Ordinance within 30 days of enactment shall be deemed
a rejection hereof by the Licensee, and the rights and privileges
- 33 -
joiad Je9A q4GT 8q4 JO PU9 9q4 4e JO '90ueuTPJO SM 90 UIJ94 9q4
go pue aq4 qodn pe4euTwj94 aq TTeqs 9OUeUTPJO ST144 japun a9suaoTq
aqq go suoTqe6Tlqo pue sqq6TJ 9qJ, L'01'
*9DUeUTPJO sTq4 Aq paquej6 s4q6Tj aq4 go Ile jo due mauej
o4 jo swa94 jeTnoT4jed due 4d000e oq punoq aq qou ITegs 96eTTTA
aqq Pue 91qe99J6e ATTen4nui aje 4etI4 SWI84 04 6UTP3ODDe aq ITeqs
UOTSU84X9 JO leM9U9J AUV *eoueUTPJO STi44 6UTPU94X9 JO 6UTMaUaJ
P3eM04 SUOT4eT4o6au 04UT J94u9 04 96elITA 9q4 qs9nb9j AMU UOSTP9
'90U?UTPJO STq4 go 94ep uoiqeJTdX9 91q4 oq joiid BuTjjn000 jeaA 4seT
9q4 JO SAep 09 4SJT3 aT44 6UTinp 9U1T4 AUP 4V *TVKaMWff 9*OT
*6UT4TJM UT 99SU8OTq aq4 Aq pa4daooe pue S9T4TjoT44nv aqeaodao:) aqq
Aq passed ueaq seq 4T ss9Tun 9AT409339 aq TTuqs OOuEuTPJO sTtP JO
4UOUIPU9UIe 20 UOT480TJTPOW 'UOTSTA9J OU 'T'S u01409s j9pun p9jTnb9j
a qTqTqxa oq s4uaulpueuie aqq jog 4daoxa *RTu-9-w-9u-9u'V G'OT
-9014OU U944TJM UT q4103 49s eq ITeqs 4uawpuawe pasodoid due go
qoaCqns aql STqq 04 quewpu9we pasodoid due uo qqTeg poo6
UT 9jeT4069U 04 sqT4jed q4oq 9JTnbei Aeui A4jed jaqqT9 'poijed jeaA
OT due UT aouo ueq4 9iow ou 4nq '9UIT4 due 4V '39UOdOO
VOT
'J94eT ST J9A9qDTqM
'Mel Aq p9jTnb9j se uoTqeoTjqnd pue abessed s4T uodn jo eAoqeUT9J9q
p9pTAojd se 9oueqd9ooe sqT go 6UTTT3 S,99SU9OTrJ a114 uodn 4oa33a pue
aOJOJ ITnj ui aq ITeqs 90ueuTPJO sTql -aqea awmana
E'OT
*poTj9d Aep OE
aT4q go uoxqeaTdxa aqq ajo;aq asodind 4eqq jog saTqTjoq4nV aqejodi6o
aqq Aq passed ATnp eoueutpio ue Aq papu@4xa aq Tleqs auiT4 90 POT39d
pies ss9Tun auTuija4ap pue aseao ATa4nTosqe ITeqs pa4ue:i6.uTaj9T4
to the term of this ordinance if the Village has exercised its
option to terminate under Section 10.1, or upon the Licensee's
forfeiture as provided in Section 11.
10.8 Ricihts U -Pon Terminatio .
10.8.1 Upon any termination of its rights and obligations
under this Ordinance, the Licensee shall not refuse to provide
electric service to any potential customers within the Village
unless a petition for abandonment has been filed with and
approved by the ICC.
10.8.2 Notwithstanding the termination of the Licensee's
rights and obligations hereunder, by forfeiture or otherwise,
the Licensee shall remain subject to all other applicable
regulations and authority of the Village, without limitation,
as long as the Licensee continues to provide electrical service
within the Village or the Licensee's Utility Facilities remain
in the Public Ways or on Public Property.
10.8.3 Any claims for indemnification for Liability
incurred by the Village, its boards, committees, commissions,
officers, agents and employees arising from any incidents that
occurred on or before the termination of this Ordinance shall
survive the termination, provided that such claims for
indemnification are timely made.
SECTION 11. REMEDIES
11.1 Subject to the limitations in Sections 11.2, 11.3 and
11.4 below, in the event the Licensee or the Village fails to
fulfill any of their respective obligations under this ordinance the
Village or the Licensee, whichever the case may be, will have claims
- 35 -
for breach of contract and specific performance against the other in
addition to any other remedy provided under this Ordinance or
otherwise provided by law, except that no remedy that would have the
effect of amending the specific provisions of this Ordinance shall
become effective without such action as would be necessary to
formally amend the Ordinance.
11.2 In the event that the Licensee violates -any terms of
this Ordinance for conduct that is subject to the exclusive
jurisdiction of a Competent Authority other than the Village, the
sole remedy for such violation shall be before that other Competent
Authority. For purposes of determining the applicability of this
Section 11.2, no provision of this Ordinance may be used as the sole
basis to defeat the exclusive jurisdiction of such Competent
Authority.
11.3 In the event that the Licensee violates any term of
this Ordinance for conduct that is also a violation of another
applicable Village ordinance, the Licensee shall be subject to
remedies under that other ordinance plus ordinary contract remedies
under this Ordinance. Licensee shall not be subject to be fined
under both Section 11.6 of this Ordinance and another ordinance of
the Village for the same conduct.
11.4 Subject to the limitation of Section 11.2, at the
option of the Village, upon the finding by the Village that the
Licensee has failed or refused to observe any terms and conditions
of this ordinance, the,Village may notify the Licensee in writing of
the terms and conditions which it has not observed. The notice shall
- 36 -
inform the Licensee of the actions which the Licensee must take to
correct the violation and shall grant the Licensee a reasonable
period of time to cure such failure or violation. In the case of an
emergency, the notice need not be made in writing. If a Competent
Authority other than the village has determined that the action
giving rise to the Village's notice constituted a violation of an
applicable rule, regulation or order of such Competent Authority,
then the cure period granted by the village shall be no less than
the cure period ordered by such Competent Authority. If the
Licensee does not eliminate or correct such failure or violation in
accordance with the notice, the Licensee's rights under this
Ordinance may be forfeited or the Licensee may be subjected to any
other remedies afforded by this Ordinance, including the assessment
of fines.
11.5 In the event that a Competent Authority revokes or
suspends any license, certificate or other authorization held by the
Licensee for the purpose of either operating any portion of its
Utility Facilities within the Village or providing electrical
service within the Village, then the Licensee's rights under this
Ordinance shall likewise be revoked or suspended, without further
notice from the Village. The Licensee's rights under this Ordinance
shall be reinstated (1) if the Competent Authority rescinds its
revocation or suspension; (2) if the revocation or suspension order
is overturned upon review by a Competent Authority; (3) if the
Competent Authority reinstates the Licensee's license; or (4) if the
suspension expires of its own terms. The original termination date
- 37 -
of this Ordinance shall not be affected if the rights forfeited
under this Ordinance are reinstated as provided herein.
11.6 If, after failing to correct a violation of the terms
and conditions of this Ordinance in accordance with the notice
issued to the Licensee under Section 11.4, the Licensee is found
guilty of violating any provision of this Ordinance for which the
village is a Competent Authority, then the Licensee shall be fined
not less than one Hundred Dollars ($100.00) nor more than Five
Hundred Dollars ($500.00) for each offense, and a separate offense
shall be deemed committed on each day during or on which a violation
occurs or continues.
SECTION 12. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
12.1 Non-DiscriMingtio . The Licensee represents that it
will not discriminate against any person employed or seeking
employment with respect to hiring, promotion or tenure, or to terms,
conditions or privileges of employment, on account of race, color,
sex, religion, national origin or ancestry, including, without being
limited to, any employment practice whereby the Licensee or any
agency engaged or used by the Licensee makes inquiry with respect to
the race, color, sex, religion, national origin or ancestry of any
applicant for employment by the Licensee.
- 38 --
12.2 Affirmative Actio -
12.2.1 The Licensee shall make good faith efforts to
expand opportunities for minorities and women in all areas of
employment, including but not limited to: hiring, promotion,
recruitment or recruitment advertising, compensation, and
selection for training and apprenticeship.
12.2.2 The Licensee shall continue
ontinue and expand its
minority purchasing program and its efforts to promote and
enhance contracting opportunities for minorities.
SECTION 13. LAWS, RULES AND REGULATIONS
13.1 Compliance with Laws, Rules and Regulations. While this
Ordinance remains in effect, the Licensee shall promptly and fully
comply with all applicable statutes, ordinances, judgments, decrees,
orders, rules and regulations of any Competent Authority other than
the Village having jurisdiction over the Licensee's activities.
13.2 Cgmpliance with Municipal Ordinances, Rules and
Reaulations. While this Ordinance remains in effect, the Licensee
shall promptly and fully comply with all applicable orders, rules,
regulations and ordinances of the Village.
13.3 Violation of Laws. Rulgg and Regulatigns. Any claim by
the Village that the Licensee has violated any provision of this
Section 13, shall be subject to the procedures set forth in Section
11 of this Ordinance.
- 39 -
SECTION 14. INDEMNIFICATION, INSURANCE AND PERFORMANCE SECURITY
14.1 Indemnification. The Licensee shall indemnify, become
responsible for and forever save harmless the Village, its boards,
committees, commission, officers, agents and employees from any and
all Liability incurred by them:
14.1.1 for loss or damage to property of the Licensee,
its officers, agents, employees, 'licensees and invitees in the
,Public Ways or on Public Property pursuant to this ordinance or
for injury to or death of any such employee, agent or licensee
while in the Public Ways or on Public Property pursuant to this
Ordinance, however arising; and
14.1.2 arising directly or indirectly from any act or
omission of the Licensee or any Person acting on its behalf
done or claimed to have been done by virtue of or pursuant to
this Ordinance or by virtue of or pursuant to order, rule,
regulation or authorization by the ICC.
14.2 Prehensive Ligl2ility insurance ozz Self-Insurang
At all times while this Ordinance remains in effect, and in
recognition of the indemnification provided in the foregoing Section
14.1, the Licensee shall, at its own cost and expense, maintain a
program of third party liability insurance and/or self-insurance to
protect the Village, its officers, employees and agents from any
liability for bodily injury, death, and property damage occasioned
by the activities of the Licensee under this Ordinance. As proof of
compliance with this requirement, the Licensee shall, during the
life of this ordinance, keep on file with the Clerk a certificate
- 40 -
of insurance and/or an affidavit of self-insurance. Said
certificate and/or affidavit shall show the types and amounts of
coverage. Any affidavit of self-insurance shall be signed by an
employee or officer of the Licensee who has knowledge of the
Licensee's self-insurance program and is authorized to make
representations as to the scope of said program, and shall contain a
statement making such representations.
14.3 indemnification Se=rit . As security for the
indemnification required in Section 14.1, the Licensee shall, during
the life of this Ordinance, keep on file with the Clerk a good and
sufficient bond in the penal sum of Five Thousand Dollars
($5,000.00) conditioned to protect and indemnify the Village as
provided in Section 14.1. Said bond shall be subject to the
approval of the Corporate Authorities. The Village reserves the
right: (1) to require the Licensee to renew said bond whenever, in
the opinion of the Corporate Authorities, such action May be
necessary; and (2) to require the Licensee to increase the amount of
said bond or to provide additional or other security in the event
said bond is insufficient to fully cover a claim made against it,
provided that the amount of the increased bond does not exceed the
total amount of the claim made against it, and provided further that
the value or amount of such other or additional security does not
exceed Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) or the total amount of the
claim made against the original bond, whichever is greater.
- 41 -
SECTION 15. MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS
15.1 Transfeg and AsnignMent.
15.1.1 Except in the event of the merger, consolidation or
reorganization of the Licensee, the Licensee shall not have the
right to assign its rights and privileges under this ordinance
or to otherwise transfer it in any manner whatsoever, without
the prior written approval of the Village, pursuant to an
ordinance enacted by the Corporate Authorities.
15.1.2 In the event of a transfer or assignment of the
Licensee's rights and privileges under this Ordinance, all
provisions of this Ordinance which are, obligatory upon, or
which inure to the benefit of, the Licensee shall also be
obligatory upon and shall inure to the benefit of any and all
successors and assigns of the Licensee.
15.2 Ordipance as Contract. This Ordinance shall have the
effect of and shall be a contract between the Village and the
Licensee and shall be a measure of the rights and obligations of the
Village as well as of the Licensee.
15.3 Ordinance Requirements as Voluntary Undertaking. The
Licensee and the Village understand that the general operations of
the Licensee are under the jurisdiction of the ICC and the FERC.
The Licensee has voluntarily agreed to perform the duties and
obligations set forth in this Ordinance, provided that such
performance does not violate any applicable regulatory standard or
any applicable statutes, ordinances, or judgments or decrees of
administrative or judicial tribunal.
- 42 -
15 .4 .4 Sc Pe of Ordinanc . No privilege or exemption is
granted or conferred to Licensee by this ordinance unless
specifically provided herein. The permission and authority granted
by this ordinance are not intended to limit or modify any agreement,
franchise, license or permit previously granted by the Village to
any other Person for the use or occupancy of the Public Ways, and
the Licensee shall therefore exercise the rights granted by this
Ordinance in such a manner as shall neither unreasonably interfere
with the rights, nor endanger or impair the property, of other
contractors, franchisees, licensee and permittees in the Public
Ways. The Village agrees to require other contractors, franchisees,
licensees and permittees of the village to exercise their rights
under such agreements, franchises, licenses and permits in such a
manner as shall neither unreasonably interfere with the rights nor
endanger or impair Utility Facilities of the Licensee located in the
Public Ways.
15.5 Exyesses To Be Borne By Ligg_nggg. Unless specifically
provided to the contrary, the Licensee shall be responsible for
procuring, through rates or otherwise, the revenues necessary to
meet the expenses of its performance under and its compliance with
this Ordinance.
15.6 Most Favored Nations PrQvisiQns.
15.6.1 In the event that the Licensee accepts from any
'Illinois municipality, other than the City of Chicago, an
electric ordinance or amendments to an electric ordinance
containing terms, conditions or provisions different from
- 43 -
those contained in this Ordinance, or if any other arrangement
is at any time made with any municipality other than the City
of Chicago, the Licensee shall inform the Village in writing of
such fact and provide a copy of such ordinance or other
arrangement to the village. If, within 90 days of such notice,
the Village adopts such other electric ordinance or other
arrangement of such other municipality, the Licensee agrees it
will accept such ordinance or other arrangement. In such
event, the term of the new ordinance will expire at the time
the original ordinance was scheduled to expire, unless
otherwise agreed by the parties. Changes in the term of the
Ordinance or arrangement shall be subject to the provisions of
this Section, unless the change in the term is for a period of
more than 50 years.
15.6.2 In the event that the Village grants any benefit
to any other electric utility regarding the use of the Public
Ways, such benefit shall be offered in writing to the Licensee,
under the same terms and conditions, within 30 days after it
has been granted to such other electric utility. If the
Licensee requests the extension of the benefit to it, the
Village will take such steps as to provide such benefit to the
Licensee under the same terms and conditions, including
amending this Ordinance accordingly.
.15.7 Severabilit . If any section, paragraph, clause or
provision of this Ordinance shall be held invalid, the invalidity of
such section, paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of
the other provisions of this Ordinance.
- 44 -
15.8Repealer. All ordinances, resolutions or orders, or
parts thereof, in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance, or
containing provisions granting any right, privilege or license to
the Licensee or to any of its predecessor companies, including An
Ordinance Authorizing Commonwealth Edison Company (Public Service
Company Division), Its Successors and Assigns, to Construct, Operate
and Maintain an Electric Light and Power System in and through the
Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, passed July 16,
1963, are hereby repealed. However, any claims for indemnification
timely and properly made under that last named ordinance survive
this repeal.
15.9 Force Majeure. The Licensee shall not be deemed in
violation of this Ordinance for the delay in performance or failure
to perform in whole or in part its obligations under this Ordinance
due to strike, war or act of war (whether an actual declaration is
made or not), insurrection, riot, act of public enemy, fire, flood
or other act of God or by other events to the extent that such
events are caused by circumstances beyond the Licensee's control and
are not caused by negligence on the part of the Licensee or any
Person acting On its behalf. In the event that the delay in
performance or failure to perform affects only part of the
Licensee's capacity to perform its obligations under this ordinance,
the Licensee shall perform such obligations to the extent it is able
to do so in as expeditious a manner as possible. Licensee shall
promptly notify the Village Electric Representative in writing of
any event covered by this Section and the date, nature and cause
- 45 -
thereof. Furthermore, Licensee, in such notice, shall indicate the
anticipated extent of such delay and the obligations under this
Ordinance to be affected thereby.
PASSED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS, this - day of 19
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
(Seal)
ATTEST:
Clerk
APPROVED:
DATE:
- 46 -
Village President
EXHIBIT A
The customer will be entitled to a reduction in charges for service
equal to the Monthly Customer Charge for any month in which service
to the customer is interrupted for a period of 12 consecutive hours
or more due to any of the following conditions: (i) company
equipment malfunction not caused by weather; *(ii) Commonwealth
Edison employee or contractor error; (iii) accident involving
Commonwealth Edison employee or contractor; (iv) damage to company
equipment caused by Commonwealth Edison employee, agent or
contractor; or (v) overloaded company distribution equipment not
caused by customer negligence. If the duration of any service
interruption resulting from any of the causes referred to in items.
(i) through (v) is equal to or exceeds 24 consecutive hours, or if
there is more than one such service interruption of 12 consecutive
hours in a month, the customer will be entitled to an additional
reduction in charges equal to the Monthly Customer Charge for such
month multiplied by the number of increments of 12 consecutive hours
of interruption in excess of the first such 12 consecutive hours.
In applying this provision to any outage in a month in which the
Customer Charge changes, the Customer Charge in effect at the start
of the outage in question shall be used.
- 47 -
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, acting in the exercise of their home rule power;
SECTION ONE: That a new Article XVI, entitled the Village of Mount Prospect
Economic Development Commission, shall be added to Chapter 5 of the Mount Prospect
Village Code to be and read as follows:
"ARTICLE XVI
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Section 1. Purom It is recognized by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect that the economic stability of the Village is dependent on
a strong and diverse commercial base. A municipality which desires to attract and
retain a vital business community must be sensitive to the complex factors which
influence today's marketplace. It is also recognized that Mount Prospect currently has
a wealth of expertise of business leaders within the community who are familiar with
the peculiar problems and strengths of the Village. For this reason, it is desirable to
form a commission that draws upon the talents of these leaders, to optimize Mount
Prospect's opportunities to attract and retain successful businesses.
Seclion 5.1602.a i n and Membersbip There is created a permanent commission
which shall be known as the Village of Mount Prospect Economic Development
Commission. The membership of this Commission, including the Chairman, shall be
appointed by the Village President with the advice and consent of the Board of
Trustees and shall be constituted as follows:
A. The Economic Development Commission shall consist of seven members. In
addition, the Economic Development Coordinator of the Planning Department
shall serve ex -officio.
B. The initial appointment shall be for the following terms:
1. 2 members - 2 years;
2. 2 members - 3 years; and
3. 3 members - 4 years.
Thereafter, each appointment shall be for four years.
C. Economic Development Commission members shall be Chief Executive Officers
or similar managerial positions of businesses or corporations in the Village,
business owners or entrepreneurs, or residents with expertise in business
development. The Chairman shall be a resident of the Village.
D. The membership shall be broadly representative of the business community in the
following respects:
1. Geographical location;
2. Type of business, i.e. retail, real estate, financial, industrial and service;
3. Educational background; and
4. Experience background.
E. Immediately upon its organization, the Economic Development Commission shall
select from its membership a vice chairman and a secretary. The person so
selected shall serve for terms of one year and may be re-elected.
- 1 -
"section ll 601 Mee ings
- -t
A. The Economic Development Commission shall meet as required but at least on
the first Thursday of each March, June, September and December. Special
meetings may be called by the Village President, the Economic Development
Commission Chairman, or by any four members of the Economic Development
Commission.
B. The Economic Development Commission shall adopt rules for the conduct of its
meetings and keep written minutes of all meetings and proceedings.
C. A copy of all minutes shall be forwarded to Village Clerk for official records.
D. All meetings of the Economic Development Commission shall be public and its
minutes shall be available for examination during regular business hours.
Section 5.1604, Objective and Role of the Egnomic Development Commissign, The
objective of the Economic Development Commission shall be to encourage and
facilitate economic growth throughout the Village. The Economic Development
Commission shall function as advisor to the. Village Board on the following economic
development goals and objectives:
A. Develop a local Economic Development Action Plan
B. Prepare appropriate economic developmental promotional materials
C. Evaluate and select promotional opportunities for local business development
efforts
D. Target specific companies or industries for business attraction efforts
E. Participate in the Business Visitation Program and evaluate findings of program
progress.
F. Develop standards for use in evaluating economic impact of new or expanding
businesses, or business relocations
G. Identify areas of joint interest for projects with the Mount Prospect Chamber
H. Recommend and evaluate legislative action of the Village Board whose purpose
would be the assurance of the health of the Mount Prospect business community.
Section 5.1605. Annual Re2Qrt, Each December, the Economic Development
Commission shall make an annual report to the President and Board of Trustees with
respect to the following:
A. Business development in the Village within the past twelve (12) months;
B. Current general business climate within Mount Prospect;
C. Specific activities of the Economic Development Commission within the past
twelve (12) months;
D. Economic prospects and trends for the Village;
E. Recommendation of measures with respect to economic development that should
be considered by the Corporate Authorities in the following twelve (12) months."
SECTION TWO: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed.
SECITON THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 19
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
•3-
Gerald L Farley, Village President
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager K,
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning
DATE: September 11, 1992
SUBJECT: Malapanas Subdivision - Development Code Modifications
Attached please find an ordinance amending Ordinance #4437, adopted by the Village
Board on June 2, 1992. The ordinance grants certain Development Code modifications
for the Malapanas Subdivision. Originally, the motion by the Board was to allow the
establishment of a cash escrow for street improvements and sidewalks within the
subdivision. However, Ordinance #4437 did not include the proper wording or section
to set up the cash escrow. This revised ordinance provides for the cash escrow, as
envisioned by the Village Board.
DMC:cl
CAF/
9/11/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4437
GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 228 AND 230 S9UH P IRIE AVENUE
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect did adopt ordinance No. 4437, granting modifications
from the Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for
property commonly known as 228 and 230 South Prairie Avenue
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) and legally described
as follows:
Lots 1 and 2 in Malapanes Subdivision of the North 151
feet of the East Half of the South Half of the West Half
of the Northeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range
11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County,
Illinois.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That SECTION ONE of Ordinance 'No. 4437 is hereby
amended to include additional provisions; so that hereinafter said
SECTION ONE of Ordinance No. 4437 shall be and read as follows:
1. That the installation of storm sewers will not be required at
the time the original subdivision is developed by Petitioner
on the Subject Property, however, installation may be required
at some future date when storm sewers are installed benefiting
the entire neighborhood; and
2. To permit a cash deposit guaranteeing installation of street
improvements and sidewalks at a future date;
To authorize a Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing installation
of street lights until such time as the Village determined.
4. To waive the requirement to install street lights, provided a
Restrictive Covenant is executed guaranteeing installation of
street lights at a future date, to be determined by the
Village.
SECTION TWO: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
4V43RF
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of , 1992.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. -Fields, Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
FROM:
MICHAEL E. JANONIS, VILLAGE MANAGER
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT:
ZBA-51.V-92, JAMESON'S CHARHOUSE
LOCATION:
1702 ALGONQUIN ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by Jameson's Charhouse. The applicant is requesting a variance
to Section 14.3003 to reduce the existing non -conforming parking by one space, and to
eliminate the required loading facility for a restaurant in order to construct an enclosed
refuse area.
Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their regular meeting of August 27,
1992. At the meeting, Attorney Anthony Lello, representing the petitioner, indicated that
the owners wished to complete an enclosed refuse area in order to screen the garbage
dumpsters. The enclosure is located in the designated loading area. He indicated that the
structure was well built and matched the existing building. Mr. Lello indicated that deliveries
were made four to five times a week and were usually finished before 11:00 a.m. He stated
that deliveries could be made from a standing loading area at the rear of the building, and
would not conflict with customer parking.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the site was developed in 1986 as part of the Algonquin
Shopping Center. The site plan also required a 12' x 35' loading area. Mr. Forsythe went
on to say that staff could support this variation request with the condition that a standing
loading area be striped so that confusion to customers and delivery vehicles would be
reduced.
The Zoning Board members discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends the approval of the variance to allow the reduction of one parking
space and the loading area with a condition that a striping plan be developed.
DMC:hg
C1
M.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS,
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLkNNERI-K—
AUGUST 17, 1992
ZBA-51-V-92
JAMESON'S CHARHOUSE
1702 ALGONQUIN ROAD
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Business Retail & Service District
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
F-A—R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The petitioners are requesting a variation from Section 14.3003 to reduce the existing non-
conforming parking by one space, and to eliminate the required loading facility for a
restaurant in order to construct an enclosed refuse area.
Summary of application: The application indicated that the petitioners wish to abandon the
designated loading dock for the restaurant located at 1702 Algonquin Road. As a result of
the new enclosure, a parking space will be eliminated. The petitioners have indicated that
the enclosed area is the only logical space for an enclosed garbage area and in their opinion
a loading dock serves no practical function for this business. The petitioners also indicated
that the structure will be aesthetically pleasing and be an integral, architecturally
complementing part of the existing building.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: This site was developed in 1986 as part of the
"Algonquin Shopping Center." The site plan dated April 7, 1986 shows a 23,050 sq. ft. one
and two-story brick building along Dempster Street and the 5,800 sq. ft. one-story brick
building which is Jameson's Charhouse. At development, the site required 116 parking
spaces and the developers provided 138 parking spaces. The plan indicates the designated
loading area of 12' x 30' with a note on the plan which states "trash containers located inside
this building. They shall only be brought outside for trash collection purposes."
The current parking and loading standards would require 92 spaces for the office and retail
area and 58 spaces for the restaurant for a total of 150 spaces, which is 12 more than
currently provided. The Ordinance also requires a 12' x 35' loading area for the restaurant.
Because this is not a change of use, a variation to the number of parking spaces required
is not necessary. The request is to reduce the existing number of parking and loading
facilities.
The loading dock, in staff's opinion, is a necessary feature to a restaurant because fresh
produce and supplies are required on a frequent basis. The elimination of the designated
loading area leaves another area which could be used for loading, however, maneuvering
a vehicle in a full parking lot may be difficult. Staff would ask that the petitioner be
prepared to discuss the delivery of goods to the restaurant and the normal hours and
frequency of the deliveries. A striping plan should also be developed so that employees and
guests are aware of the loading area and parking areas.
'IlM:rl.l1T`
The Engineering Division has indicated that existing drainage patterns should not be altered.
The inspection Services Department would like to remind the petitioner that a building
permit is required to finish this project, should the variation be granted.
�.�:_` !mow_ � t • �
It is the opinion of the Planning staff that a variation to allow the reduction in parking by
one space and the elimination of the designated loading area be approved with the
condition that the area be striped so that delivery vehicles can maneuver in and out of the
area.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 51-V-92
Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER:
Jameson's Charhouse
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1702 Algonquin Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 11, 1992
REQUEST:
A variation from Section 143003 to reduce non-
conforming parking by one space, and to
eliminate the required loading facility for a
restaurant in order to construct an enclosed
refuse area.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
d Cassidy
Ronald
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced agenda item SBA -51-V-92 as being a request by Jameson's
Cbarhouse, 1702 Algonquin Road to reduce non -conforming parking by one space, and to
eliminate the required loading facility for a restaurant in order to construct an enclosed
refuse area.
Mr. Anthony Lello introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals as the attorney
representing Jameson's Charhouse. The attorney noted that this request involves the
reduction of one existing parking space at the restaurant. He explained that this space had
always been used as a dumpster location and a place for an outside grease trap, and in
effect the number of usable parking spaces atthe restaurant was not changing. He stated
that the brick refuse enclosure was being constructed in the area of the loading dock in
order to provide more attractive screening for the dumpster areas and for the restaurant to
better utilize this space. He stated that the restaurant receives deliveries four to five times
a week. He stated that deliveries usually occur before 9:00 am. and that definitely all
deliveries are concluded before 11:00 a.m., the beginning of the lunch time trade. He stated
that all the deliveries are by two -axle trucks, and that these trucks can park in an existing
maneuvering aisle, and unload with access through a rear door. He stated that there. are
no long semi -trucks involved with the deliveries, except a once -a -week beer truck and that
ZBA-51-V-92
Page 2
this delivery occurs during non -peak periods. He stated that the loss of the one space and
the loss of the loading area -would not impact operations and would not adversely affect
parking. 'He also stated the brick enclosure matches the building.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff request for the Zoning Board of Appeals and
acknowledged that this is a reduction of one parking space on-site along with the required
loading dock. Mr. Forsythe stated that the restaurant was developed in 1986 as part of the
Algonquin Shopping Center and at that time, 116 parking spaces were required and 138
spaces were provided on-site. The current parking requirements would be for a total of 150
spaces so the restaurant has a non-conforraing number of parking spaces. Mr. Forsythe
explained that he believed the petitioner had done a good job in explaining, deliveries to the
restaurant, which helped demonstrate that the loss of the loading space would not impact
operations nor parking on-site. He stated that staff would recommend approval of the
request, subject to striping of the area to be used as a standing loading area behind the
restaurant.
Mr. Basnik asked if the petitioner would be willing to stripe the area as requested by staff,
and Mr. Lello stated that this would be properly striped.
Mrs. Skowron noted that the dumpster enclosure had been partially completed, and the
attorney explained that his client had hired a contractor to do the work with the assumption
that all necessary permits would be obtained. Unfortunately, this had not been done.
Mr. Pratt questioned the actual location where trucks load and enter the restaurant, and the
attorney explained that access is by a rear door.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request.
Mr.. Saviano moved, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, that the Zoning Board of Appeals
recommend approval of a variation to reduce the number of non -conforming parking spaces
by one, and to eliminate
Road.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Pr.
NAYS: None
The motion carried by'a vote of 6-0. Thi.,
Board for their consideration.
icting (lock tor the restaurant at 17W Algonquin
3, Saviano, Cassidy, Skowron and Basnik
recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
j//'6 -
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONTS VILLAGE MANAGER &PV4
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMJ KS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-54-SU-92, DON LUPORINI
LOCATION: 416 SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a Special Use Permit filed by Don Luporini. The applicant is requesting to place a ten foot
diameter satellite antenna in the rear of his property at 416 South Mount Prospect Road,
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 27, 1992.
At the meeting Don Luporini explained the proposed location for the antenna and indicated
that it would be screened by his existing garage, six foot fences and existing landscaping to
the north and south, and by a chain-link fence and landscaping to the west.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that all the standards for a satellite antenna have been met
by the petitioner.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning
Board recommends approval of the Special Use request to allow a 10 foot diameter satellite
antenna in the location indicated on the site plan as submitted by the petitioner.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 54 -SU -92
Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER:
Don Luporini
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
416 South Mount Prospect Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 11, 1992
REQUEST:
The petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit
as required in Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a
satellite antenna, which is 10 feet in diameter,
in an "R-1" Single Family District.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced ZBA-54-SU-92 at 416 South Mount Prospect Road. This
is a Special Use request to allow a satellite antenna in a R-1 Single Family District.
Mr. Don Luporini introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that he
would like to construct a satellite receiving dish in the rear yard of his home. He stated that
the dish would have an overall height of 10 feet and that it would be located behind an
existing detached garage. He stated that the satellite dish is partially screened from a
neighbor's home by a 6 foot fence, and that there are also mature bushes to the west that
screen the installation from the property owner to the west He also pointed out that his
property abuts Novak and Parker Appliances to the south, and therefore, the satellite dish
would have no adverse impact. Mr. Luporini also explained that he discussed this with his
neighbors and that they had no objections.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe stated that the antenna would be located 27 feet from the rear property line and
5 feet from the side property line, and that there is an existing 6 foot fence and mature
landscaping to help screen the satellite dish from adjoining properties. Mr. Forsythe then
summarized the Special Use standards of the Zoning Ordinance for a satellite dish, and
ZBA-54-SU-92
Page 2
indicated that the proposed installation by the petitioner met all appropriate standards of
the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff would recommend approval of the
request.
No one appeared to speak in favor or in opposition to the Special Use application.
Mr. Basnik asked if the satellite dish was for television or radio reception, and the petitioner
stated that it was for television reception.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a; motion. Mr. Brettrager
moved, seconded by Mr. Pratt, that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of
a Special Use Permit to allow a satellite dish at 416 South Mount Prospect Road.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Saviano Pratt, Skowron, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS�
GIL BASNIIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: RAY P. FORSYTHE, PLANNE
DATE: AUGUST 17, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-54-SU-92
APPLICANT: DON LUPORINI
ADDRESS: 416 SOUTH MOUNT PROSPECT ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 8,104 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: N/A
FAX : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit as required in Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow
a satellite antenna, which is 10 feet in diameter, in an "R-1" Single Family District.
Summary of application: The application indicates that a satellite antenna, 10 ft. in
diameter, is to be located approximately 27 ft. from the rear property line and 5 ft. from the
side property line. The applicant has indicated that there is an existing 6 ft. fence along the
side yard with mature landscaping on the adjacent property and a 4 ft. cyclone fence with
landscaping to the rear.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The Zoning Ordinance allows a satellite antenna in
residential areas provided a Special Use Permit is granted. There are several standards a
resident must meet in order for the Special Use Permit to be considered. Following is a
summary of the standards:
1. The maximum diameter of a dish shall not exceed eleven feet (11'). The
proposed dish is 10 ft: in diameter.
2. The dish shall be located entirely behind the rear building line and shall not
be located within any required side or rear yard. The proposed location is in
a permitted area.
Any dish exceeding forty inches (40") in diameter shall be mounted on the
ground. The proposed dish is ground -mounted.
4. No more than one satellite antenna shall be installed on a lot: Only one dish
is proposed.
5. No dish shall be located closer than ten feet (10') from a principal building
or structure. The location exceeds 10 feet .from the dwelling unit.
6. Any ground -mounted dish shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height above
grade. The proposed dish is 12 ft. in height.
7. All ground -mounted satellite antennas shall be installed and landscaped so as
to be compatible with surrounding properties. The antenna will be located
behind the existing garage and screened to the north by a 6 ft. fence and
mature landscaping. To the south is a parking lot for the Novak and Park
Appliance Store. To the west is a cyclone fence with some low landscaping.
There also is additional landscaping on the neighbor's property to the west.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
There were no negative comments received from other Village staff. All required building
permits are required should the Special Use Permit be granted.
Wimmmy=1 WMENDATION
It is the opinion of the planning staff that a Special Use Permit be granted to the petitioner
to allow a satellite antenna, as indicated on the submitted site plan, as all appropriate
standards have been met.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE MANAGER
-
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENT , hDCTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1992
SUBJECT. ZBA-58-V-92, EDWARD WOJDYLA
LOCATION: 515 NORTH FAIRVIEW AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by Edward Wojdyla. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.1102.A to allow a front yard setback of 23'-6" instead of the minimum required
30 feet, to allow the construction of a porch with overhead root
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Ed Wojdyla explained that he is a long-time resident of this home and that
his mother had recently moved in with his family. The addition to the family has required
them to design plans for an addition to the second floor of the home. At the same time,
the architect designed a new porch with overhead root He indicated that the porch was
aesthetically pleasing and would make it more convenient for his mother to gain access to
the home.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that the dormer additions were allowed. The porch
however, required a variation. Mr. Forsythe indicated that staff has concerns with the mass
of this structure as it runs the length of the home. He went on to say that staff could not
support the entire width of the house but would support a request for a porch with overhead
roof if it was only placed in front of the door.
Several neighbors spoke in favor of the request. The neighbors felt this was a good request
and felt that the proposed porch would be a good addition to the neighborhood as well as
add value to the surrounding properties.
The Zoning Board members discussed the request and felt that the petitioner has done a
good job in getting support from so many neighbors. By a vote of 5-1 the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 6-6" porch to the existing
structure which would result in a front yard setback of 23'-6".
DMC:bg
F'Art
� wrRU
(41
C:) Vy
><
ry
z
rn
rn
c:,
M. ---i-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 58-V-92
Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER:
Edward Wojdyla
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
515 North Fairview Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 11, 1992
REQUEST:
A variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a
front yard setback of 23'-6" instead of the
minimum required 30 ft. to allow the
construction of a porch with overhead roof.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Chairman Basnik then introduced ZBA-58-'V-92, a request by Edward Wojdyla at 515 North
Fairview, to allow a front yard setback of 23-6" instead of the required 30 foot setback to
allow the construction of a porch with an overhead roof.
Mr. Wojdyla, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that he was a
long-time resident of Mount Prospect, and that recently his mother-in-law had moved in with
his family and that there was a need to construct an additional bedroom, He stated that as
a result of conversations with an architect, the overall appearance of the home could be
improved with the second floor bedroom construction, if a covered porch were constructed
on the front of the house. He stated that this would require removal of an existing front
stoop and the evergreens in front of the house, and that the covered porch would offer more
room and weather protection for his family. He stated that he had reviewed the staff report
which had suggested reducing the bulk of the encroachment in the required front yard, and
stated that his architect had indicated that the overhang could be cut back to a 5 foot
dimension if a different roof pitch was used. Mr. Wojdyla stated that he had talked with
a number of his neighbors about the request and showed them elevation drawings of the
home and that all of the neighbors had indicated support for the variation.
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe noted that the petitioner would like to construct a 6'-6" porch, the entire length of
ZBA-58-V-92
Page2
the house, that would reduce the required 30 foot front yard to 23'-6". He stated that the
Zoning Ordinance allows open steps and terraces in a front yard and eaves to encroach 18
inches. Becausethe petitioner would like to construct a porch with an overhead roof, this
variation became necessary. Mr. Forsythe stated that staff is concerned about the bulk of
the addition, and questions if the porch size is too great considering the existing setbacks
of this block. Mr. Forsythe stated that all homes seem to be at a uniform setback and that
staff would be reluctant to see a front yard reduced when you have an established setback
pattern on a block. Mr. Forsythe explained that perhaps the bulk of the encroachment
could be reduced from being the entire length of the house, to perhaps a revised roof
treatment extending over the front door to provide some of the character that the petitioner
is hoping to establish. He indicated that he believes staff could support a revised request
that provided for a porch, but that did not extend the entire length of the house.
Chairman Basnik then asked' for comments from the audience. The following residents
spoke in support of the application. Helen "Anderson, 521, Fairview, Paul Kasellco, 517
Fairview, Greg Warmine, 515 Fairview, Bob Beale, 520 Fairview. Mr. Basnik stated that
he encourages and appreciates petitioners working with neighbors and stated that this
definitely helps the public hearing process.
Mr. Brettrager had a question about the second floor addition and the width of the dormers,
and he discussed the appearance of the dormer addition.
Chairman Basnik stated that this is a large encroachment and he understands the concerns
and positions of the staff, but he believes that the overall plan has been well thought out
and that this improves the appearance of the home, and that neighborhood support indicates
that there would be no adverse impact.
Mr. Cassidy stated that the petitioner had demonstrated some hardship, and that the
proposed variation helps,solve the needs of the petitioner.
Mr. Basnik; questioned the percent of lot coverage, and Mr. Forsythe indicated that the
property has a 35% lot coverage.
Mrs. Skowron questioned the last time the Zoning Board of Appeals had approved a-front
yard encroachment, and stated that in her memory this had been a variation that the Zoning
Board is typically very ,stringent on, and that others had been denied. She believed a
perspective on past requests is important, even withthesupport of the neighbors.
Mr. Basnik stated that he believes part of the request is due to the narrow 50 foot lot.
Mrs. Skowron_stated that the petitioner had previously stated he would compromise on the
amount of encroachment and reduce the roof pitch to provide for a 5 foot encroachment,
and she asked if the Zoning Board was willing to consider the petitioner's suggested
compromise.
ZBA-58-V-92.
Page 3
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and indicated they would support the
application as filed by the petitioner.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion. Mr. Cassidy
moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a variation to allow a 23'-
6" required front yard, rather than the 30 ft. setback for the property at 515 North Fairview.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: Skowron
The motion carried by a vote of 5-1. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
a 4 C"A43-
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
La ;
R-1 Single Family Residential
7,238 sq. I4.
(current) 31.28%, (proposed) 34.30%
Front Yard: (current) 25% (proposed) 35%
.23
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a front yard setback
of 23'-6" instead of the minimum required 30 ft. to allow the construction of a porch with
overhead roof.
Summary of application: The petitioners would like to construct a 6'-6" x 33'-7.5" porch
with an overhead roof along the entire width of their home. The petitioners are adding
dormers to the second story which do not require variations and would like to construct the
porch at the same time. The application indicates that the existing concrete stoop is in
disrepair and the evergreens are overgrown. They believe the porch and roof will enhance
the architecture of the home and the character of the neighborhood.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The Zoning Ordinance allows open steps or a terrace
to encroach into the front yard setback. The Ordinance also allows eaves to overhang the
front yard setback up to a maximum of 18 inches. Because the petitioner would like to
construct a porch with an overhead roof, a variation is necessary. The variation request is
to allow a porch with overhead roof to encroach the front yard setback 6'-6" the entire
width of the house (33'-7.5"). This leaves a front yard setback of 23'-6" instead of the
required 30 feet.
The petitioner has indicated that the proposed porch is requested to replace the dilapidated
steps and overgrown evergreens. Staff is concerned with the bulk of the addition and
questions if the porch size is too great considering the existing setbacks on this block.
There were no negative comments received from other Village staff members. Inspection
Services would like to remind the petitioner that should the variation be approved, a
building permit is required.
SUMMARY/RECOhMNDATION
It is the recommendation of the Planning staff that the variation request to allow a covered
porch to extend 6'-6" into the front yard setback along the entire width of the house be
denied. All other homes on this block are built at the same setback, and this proposed
covered porch would encroach into the established setback of this block. However, staff
would support a porch/roof combination at the front door of the house. This would
minimize the bulk of the encroachment from being the entire length of the house, and allow
a revised roof treatment extending over the front door that still provides some of the
character that the petitioner is hoping to establish.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Michael E. Jannis, Village Manager
Iff��
FROM:
David M. Clements, Director of Planning
DATE:
September 11, 1992
SUBJECT:
ZBA-55-V-92, Mr. & Mrs. Charles Davies
LOCATION:
400 North Forest Avenue
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Charles and Therese Davies. The applicant is requesting a
variation to allow an accessory structure to be located 5' from the principle structure instead
of the. minimum 10' in order to construct a detached garage.
The Zoning Board considered the request at the meeting of September 10, 1992. At the
meeting Mr. and Mrs. Davies indicated that they would like to build a two -car detached
garage and are proposing a location at a 20' conforming setback for an exterior yard. This
location results in the 5' separation request. Mr. Davies stated that later Mr. Clements,
Planning Director, had suggested that the garage be moved further back, to possibly be in
line with the houses. Mr. Davies explained that a mature tree would have to be removed
to provide a 40' setback, but that he could move the garage back to a 30' setback.
Mr. Clements summarized the staff report and indicated that the Zoning Ordinance would
allow a 20' setback along Gregory, however, staff had received objections from the neighbor
to the west and encouraged the Davies to move the garage further back.
Mr. Dan Hajduk, 802 West Gregory indicated that he lived directly next to the Davies and
objected to any variations being granted. He stated that he felt there were safety concerns
due to the elementary school across the street. He also felt that the garage would project
in front of his home, impacting his property and the neighborhood.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. The members felt that by moving the
garage to a 30' setback line, the Davies were offering a good compromise. By a 5-0 vote,
the Zoning Board recommends approval of the variance request to allow an accessory
structure to be built within 5' of the principal structure at 400 North Forest Avenue, subject
to the following conditions:
1. The garage shall be set back a minimum of 30' from the exterior side property line.
2. The existing garage door shall be removed within one year.
3. The existing driveway shall be removed within one year.
4. The east garage wall shall be lined with class X 5/8" drywall.
RF:cl
Molntosh *L ..'a Northwest Meadows, being a Subdivision in the East he
Township 42 North, R., 11, East of the Third .. 4ipal Meridian, in
Illinois,
'W. .PEG aler,
sT.
w
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA'CASE NO. 55-V-92
Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER:
Charles Davies
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
400 North Forest Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 11, 1992
REQUEST:
The petitioner is seeking a variation from
Section 14.102 to allow an 5 ft. separation
between the principal and accessory structure
instead of the required 10 ft. in order to
construct a detached accessory structure.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Michaele Skowron
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
ABSENT:
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Dan Hajduk, 802 West Gregory
Chairman Basnik then introduced ZBA-55-V-92 being a request by Charles'Davies to reduce
the 10 foot required separation between a principal structure and a garage to.5 feet in order
to allow the construction of a detached garage. Chairman Basnik then swore in Mr. Davies
prior to his testimony.
Mr. Davies explained that he would like to construct a two -car detached garage in his rear
yard facing Gregory Street, and that he is proposing to place this garage at a 20, foot
conforming setback for an exterior yard, and that this location reduces the 10 foot building
separation to 5 feet. He explained that a former one -car attached garage had been
converted to a family room, and that he would be removing this old driveway with
construction of the garage and drive. Mr. Davies explained that staff had asked that the
garage be moved back to the proposed location from an earlier request which provided for
an 11 foot setback and that staff had contacted them and asked them to consider moving
the garage beyond the 20 foot sideyard requirement, in order to keep the garage in line with
the existing house as much as possible.
,
Chairman Basnik then swore in Dave Clements, Director of Planning, prior to his testimony.
Mr. Clements stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires a 10 foot separation between a
house and a garage, and that this is proposed to be reduced to 5 feet with this request. Mr.
Clements confirmed that a one -car attached garage had been converted into living space,
ZBA-55-V-92
Page 2
and that the Davies would now like to construct a two -car detached garage. Mr. Clements
pointed out that the garage is constructed at a 20 foot exterior sideyard setback, and that
the location provides for a 5 foot sideyard to the west. As to the impact to surrounding
properties, Mr. Clements pointed out that the petitioner's home and the house to the west
are built at the same 40 foot setback, and with a garage at a 20 foot setback, the structure
will encroach in front of the two houses. Mr. Clements noted that the property owner to
the west has some concerns with the garage location, and believes there is an adverse
impact on his property. Mr. Clements noted that the petitioner had originally filed an
application to provide for an 11 foot setback, and that staff was concerned with this request
and had asked the ,Davies to move the garage to a minimum 20 foot yard. He stated there
appeared to be room to move the garage further north, and based on concern for the garage
encroaching in front of the two existing houses, and the comments from the neighbor, staff
had asked the petitioner to consider moving the garage further north.
Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Davies if
th
north, and Mr. Davies stated there is an
could move the garage an additional 10
tree.,
ere was a possibility of moving the garage further
existing patio and tree at this location, but that they
feet and hopefully not impact the root system of the
Chairman Basnik then asked for comment«
that he had submitted a letter to the Zo
summarize the main points of his letter. h
40 foot setback as is the Davies property,
Gregory Street with this area being the m
at a 20 foot setback would provide an apt
believed this would have an adverse impact
attached garage' on the home was the b
objections to the proposed garage location.
that, when the existing garage was convert
removed, and asked if the petitioner cou
existing driveway as soon as possible.
Mr. Basnik explained to Mr. Hajduk that t;
back to a 30 foot setback, thereby meeting c
Mr. Davies if he would be willing to take
driveway. Mr. Davies stated that they h
overhead door and install a picture windo
soon as the new garage and drive are instal
at least a year to do these improvements a
-om the audience. Mr. Daniel Hajduk, stated
ig Board of Appeals and asked if he could
Hajduk explained that his house is built on a
Ld both of these homes are oriented towards
i front yard. He stated that placing a garage
trance of a structure in a front yard, and he
a the neighborhood. He believed the original
t location for a garage, and stated he had
Ar. Hajduk also stated' he objected to the fact
to a family room the overhead door was not
remove the former ` overhead door and the
petitioner was p
icerns from Mr.1
t the overhead c
planned all al(
and that they wi
d. However, Mr
i matter of finar
Mr. Basnik then asked for discussions from the Zc
Zoning Board discussed the request, and Mr. Brett
petitioner was attempting to increase the garage :
comments in an attempt to provide a` better` setba
g to move the garage
and Mr. Basnik asked
I remove the existing
take out the existing
nove the driveway as
y stated he would` like
5.,
ring Board of Appeals. Members of the
ager emphasized to Mr. Hajduk that the
etback out of concern for Mr. Hajduk's
A.
ZBA-55-V-92
Page 3
There was discussion about on -street parking in the area, and Mr. Hajduk stated that the
petitioner could park their cars in the existing gravel shoulder, and that they could take out
the existing driveway immediately.
'Mr. Cassidy stated he thought this was unreasonable, and that on -street parking is not
allowed even if the area in front of the Davies home is a wider shoulder due to a drop-
off point for children at the school. Mr. Hajduk stated he did not necessarily know that the
Davies were proposing to take out the existing overhead door, and he stated that this
satisfies that concern.
Mrs. Skowron pointed out that she understood that the Davies were requesting a
development plan that best met their needs,, and Mr. Hajduk was attempting to represent
his concerns, and she believed that the petitioners were offering a reasonable compromise
trading -off the 5 foot variation by stating that they would move the garage back to a 30
foot setback. Mrs. Skowron also hoped that the Davies and the Hajduk's could be good
neighbors after this difference of opinion about the garage location.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Lannon moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a variation to
reduce the 10 foot required building separation to 5 feet in order to allow the construction
of a garage at 400 North Forest. He stated this motion was subject to placing the garage
at a 30 foot building setback, removing the existing overhead garage door and driveway with
one year, and the installation of Class X fire -rated drywall in the new garage. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll. Call:, AYES: Brettrager, Skowron, Lannon, Cassidy and Basnik
J
NAYS: None
The motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS'
GIL BASNIK, CHAI
FROM:
DAVID SL CLEMEMCTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-SSV.92
APPLICANT.
CHARLES C. DAVIES
ADDRESS:
400 NORTH FOREST AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE.- 9,914.41 sq. (L
% COVERAGE- (current) 239796-, (proposed) 28%
F.A.R.: .14
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a variation from Section 14.102 to allow a five (5) foot separation
between the principal structure and accessory structure instead of the required ten (10) ft.
in order to construct a detached garage.
Summary of application: The applicants own a home on the northwest corner of Forest and
Gregory. A one -car attached garage has been converted into living space by a former
owner, and the Davies would now like to construct a new two -car detached garage. Please
note that the old garage door has not been removed. The petitioners plan on removing this
overhead door when the new garage is constructed.
The garage is to be constructed on the west side of their yard, at a conforming 20 foot
exterior yard setback. The proposed location is also five feet from the house, a reduction
of the required 10 foot separation.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioner's home, and the house to the west are
built at the same 40 ft. setback. The garage is to be located at a 20 foot setback. As such,
the garage will encroach in front of -the houses, but still will meet the 20 foot setback for
an exterior sideyard.
The property owner to the west believes the garage location has an adverse impact on his
home.
It should be noted that this application was originally filed with a variation for an 11 ft.
setback from Gregory Street. Staff had serious concerns about this request, and urged the
petitioners to move the garage to at least the 20 foot minimum setback. The 20 foot
setback results in the garage being located 5 ft. from the house.
SFR 1] EPARTMENNTAI MMENTS
1. Inspection Services states that 5/8" Class X drywall be installed inside the garage.
2. Drainage should not be effected by the garage construction, but no fill should be
placed in the sideyard.
3. Any downspouts should be directed to discharge to the front of the lot.
4. The existing driveway will have to be removed.
SOMAMIRECOMMENDATION
The Planning staff believes the 20 foot conforming setback is much improved over the
original variation request of 11 ft. However, the property owner to the west believes there
is an adverse impact, even with the 20 foot setback. There appears to be room to move'the
garage north, to reduce the encroachment in front of the front line of the houses. This
would still result in the 5 ft. building separation. Staff has no objections to reducing the 10
ft. separation to 5 ft., but the petitioner should address the possibility of moving the garage
further north.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Michael E. Janoni'age Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning
DATE: September 11, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-62-V-92
LOCATION: 50 South Emerson
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
variation requests filed by the Village of Mount Prospect. The request is to allow the
following variations so that a one-story 1,900 square foot addition to the Senior Citizen
Center can be constructed:
1. A variation to Section 14.1803 to allow a maximum land coverage of 90.05% instead
of the maximum 75%.
2. A variation to Section 14.3012 to allow the current 39 parking spaces instead of the
required 55 spaces.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 10,
1992. At the meeting David Clements explained that the current budget for the Village
includes the proposed addition. Nancy Morgan, Human Services Administrator discussed
with the Zoning Board members the shortage of space for Human Service employees and
that many alternatives had been looked at and the proposed addition was the best solution
to their needs.
Dave Clements indicated that the area that the addition is to be located is behind the Senior
Center, and that the small park is under-utilized open space. He stated that this location
is best for the addition, as no parking is removed and only minor interior alterations are
necessary in the existing building. Mr. Clements also indicated that the office addition
would not generate a demand for more parking, and that his helps justify the parking
variation.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and determined that helping solve the
space needs of the Human Services Division was important, and that loss of the small park
site was minor as it was not extensively used., Also, parking needs will not increase as a
result of the addition.
By a vote of 5-0, the Zoning Board recommends approval of the following variations to
allow the additions to the Senior Center:
1. A variation to Section 14.1803 to allow a maximum land coverage of 90.05% instead
of the maximum 75%.
2. A variation to Section 14.3012 to allow the current 39 parking spaces instead of the
required 55 spaces.
RF:cl
Z' CALM. STEEL CONDUIT. 30' DEEP (TYPI
wrnr
4 PVL SCH 40, 30' DEEP ITYP)
/D
'_T
.49. TO
%
05"
a 6C 7N�
67hl
.10
63. 665aN
b i
Of .Cvl S!0I - E2
I SEE SPECSI
*Ascii ✓ 1911'-W 0 0.50%
D4
MHT11'
66.00
Gz: 62
e.
oll 7,—Er '\t
ov0rV LLIMC
L L L7j-_l_._'_r__r�_ u - -yIC 7 ia - c 3 I --c- L -X __L
3- 3- 1- 1 1 3
l
J__j - - __ - -I- . D - - 3 - - I : � : - I
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - — -
"50: -----------------------------------------
Ci
V)
ALJ
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 62-V-92 Hearing Date: August 27, 1992
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 50 South Emerson Street
PUBLICATION DATE: August 26, 1992
REQUEST: The following variations are requested in order
to allow a 4,0.5' x 47' addition to the existing
structure: 1.) A variation to Section 14.1803 to
allow a maximum land coverage of 90.05%
instead of the maximum 75%. 2.) A variation
from the minimum required parking spaces of
55 to allow the current 39 spaces.
MEMBERS PRESENT- Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrdger
Peter Lannon
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
OBJECTORS/IN'T'ERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced -ZBA-62-V-92 being a request by the Village of Mount
Prospect for variations to allow the construction of an addition to the Senior Center.
Chairman Basnik then swore in David Clements, Director of Planning, prior to his
testimony.
Mr. Clements then discussed the lot coverage variation. He explained, that the B-2 Zoning
District provides for a maximum 75% lot coverage. The Senior Center is non -conforming
at 85.610 lot coverage, and the proposed addition increases this lot coverage to 90%. He
noted that the addition is to'
open space on-site. He contj
addition can be constructed W
this location is important be(
Center and can be constructer
that eliminating the park is r
setback, such as a front yard t
that the area of the park had
the Village acquiring the buil
Concerning the parking vania
require an increase in parking
number of spaces for the Seni
the building. He noted that w
the V & G Printers, available
staff used the 39 spaces imme(
these are the spaces that are 1
noted that senior parkers spill
most important point to not
necessary for existing staff at
Clements concluded and state
is no new parking demand at
not contribute to a parking pi
Nancy Morgan then introduced h,
space need problem for approxin
grown, that several part-time pos
Coordinator office is at the Publi
position would be brought into the
help the efficiency of the Networ)
sharing office space and a social v
some social workers need private
the,one-story addition is the best
story addition was considered, but
for an elevator, this idea was not
it was originally constructed 15 ye
Center, and that the best use of the
at the building.
No one appeared to speak in faw
Chairman Basnik then asked for (
the addition only meets the imine
room for future space needs. Ms
ample room for the future of the
I and explai
it will not e
it matches
hout signific
n aesthetic �
s prominent
i the locatioi
r or in
ZBA-62-V-92
Page 2
an area of a small park, thereby, reducing
.d that this is the only location where the
minate parking spaces. He also noted that
[p with existing office space in the Senior
it interior alterations. Mr. Clements noted
sue, as this is not an important landscape
visible from a street. He also pointed out
of a parking lot for the old library prior to
stated that the Zoning Ordinance would
itional office space. He said the required
there are 39 spaces immediately north of
ig lot expansion at the former location of
sed over 50 spaces. Mr. Clements stated
wilding for the variation request, because
y -to -day needs at the Senioir tenter. He
:he recent parking expansion and that the
i, is that the additional office space is
,f will be brought into the facility. Mr.
the addition providing office space, there
the proposed increase in floor area will
Board and stated that there has been a
at the facility. She stated that staff has
ome full-time, and that the Network 50
r on Central Road. She stated that this
vith the new addition, and that this would
She also used the example of employees
office in a 6' x 12' former closet, and how
,rs of confidentiality. She explained that
;pace needs problems, and that a second
aced construction costs and requirements
ated that the park was a good idea when
tt it is not used by patrons of the Senior
,uld be to solve the space needs problems
on to the request.
the Zoning Board. Mr. Cassidy asked if
he staff, and if there would be sufficient
I that she believed the addition provides
s Department.
ZBA-62-V-92
Page 3
Mr. Lannon questioned the concept of the two story addition. Ms. Morgan stated that this
was an earlier option, but that new requirements for ADA law would require an elevator,
and cost factors were approximately double the present budget for the facility.
Ms: Skowron asked Ms. Morgan if she felt the addition would benefit the entire Village, and
she explained that the addition is at the Senior Center, but that users of the Senior Center
are just one phase of activities for the Human Services Division. Ms. Skowron asked if
office space could be provided in the Village Hall, and Ms. Morgan stated there is no space
available of sufficient size to meet her staffing problems. Ms. Skowron pointed out that she
is always concerned about increasing impervious surface with a variation request and that
the 4% involved with this application is a notable increase.
Mr. Lannon concurred and stated that this is an area of combined sewers and while there
is a parking lot storm sewer, this does drain to a combined sewer that can conceivably
contribute to sewer back-up problems downstream. Mr. Clements noted that with the
addition of storm sewers in the parking lot, the drainage problem is better than it has been
in the pasL
Mr. Basnik questioned how many residents used the Senior Center, and Ms. Morgan stated
there are 800 seniors a week at the facility.
There being no furtber discussion, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Cassidy moved, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend
approval of a lot coverage variation to allow 9Wo lot coverage, and a parking variation to
reduce the 55 parking spaces to 39 to allow an addition at the Senior Center at 50 South
Emerson Street.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Skowron, Cassidy and Basn*
NAYS: None *
The motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board for their consideration.
PA, Uh"
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMM
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS'
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 1, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-62-V-92
APPLICANT.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECT SENIOR CITIZEN CENTER
ADDRESS:
50 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
iing
LE
I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-2
LOT SIZE: 33,228 sq. ft
% COVERAGE: (current) 85.67% (proposed 90.05%
F.A.R.: N/A
U
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The following variations are requested in order to allow a 1,900 sq. ft. addition to the
Mount Prospect'Senior Center:
1. A variation to Section 14.1803 to allow a maximum land coverage of 90.05% instead
of the maximum 75%.
2. A variation to Section 14.3012 to allow the current 39 parking spaces instead of the
required 55 spaces.
PLANNING A "_ ZONIN!G COMMENTS AND!CONCER.NS
Summary of application: In the current fiscal year budget, the Village Board included
funding for an addition to the Senior Center. The addition is necessary to solve space needs
for staff in the building. The addition provides five offices and needed storage space.
Nancy Morgan, Human Services Administrator, will be in attendance at the Zoning Board
meeting to further explain the space needs issue.
The addition will be located on the west side of the building, in an offset area that is
currently a small park or sitting area. This location is the only area available to
accommodate the addition. The new office space will tie into the existing floor plan of the
Senior Center without interior alterations, and this location avoids eliminating parking.
Two variations as noted above are necessary to allow construction of the addition
L Lat Cove ragg V riation: The existing B-2 Zoning District provides for a maximum
75% lot coverage. The existing Senior Center is non -conforming at 85.6% lot
coverage. The proposed addition increases lot coverage to 90%. The addition is to
be constructed in the area of a small park, thereby reducing open space on-site. This
park is under-utilized, users of the facility do not generally have activities in the
park.
Because this is the only location where the addition can be constructed, it is
necessary to eliminate the park and increase lot coverage. Eliminating the park is
not an aesthetic issue as it is not an important landscape setback and Ws location
behind the Senior Center is not visible to the public. However, storm water run-
off will increase as a result of the addition. It should be noted that storm sewers
were installed in the most recent expansion of the parking lot, the former location
of V & G Printers. This will help address the increased stormwater ran -off.
2.1 Pukine Variation: The Zoning ordinance requires an increase in parking spaces
with additional office space. The required number of spaces for the Senior Center
with the addition is 55 spaces. There are 39 spaces immediately north of the
building. In processing this variation request, staff used the 39 spaces as these are
typically utilized by the Senior Center. However, the parking lot expansion at the
former V & G Printers location increased parking to over 50 spaces. Senior Center
parkers, frequently spill over into this area. Shopper parking is also available with
the Busse Avenue parking lot. Parking is available for most day-to-day needs of the
Senior Center.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
While this helps justify the parking variation, it is important to note that no new staff
will be added as a result of the addition, so parking demand is no different than
existing conditions.
QMM DEPARTMENTAL COMMEMS
1. The Engineering Division states that this is an area of combined sewers, however,
storm sewers are available in part of the parking lot.
2. Roof drains shall discharge at grade.
3. The addition is to be sprinkled with a two year period to sprinkle the entire building,
9&MMM=MMENPA33ON
Staff would recommend approval of the two variations in order to allow construction of the
addition. The lot coverage increase is minor. The, park area is the only place the addition
can be constructed, and it eliminates under-utilized open space that is best put to use as
office area to solve staff space needs. The additional office space will not increase parking
demand at the Senior Center, so there will be no changes in the parldng situation at the
facility.
DMC:hg
�mprohenslv* Housing U.S. Doodifuttem of mosims
WW Ufa" oovo*~t ^1
APPENDIX 0040 of clIffifflutter Raw" NDIX 8 effir
OONSWIRY StfltsgY
(CHAS)
iii -me OF ortwo0wxol OF ern
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
c4men AWW" �T'2 I, NkwnOer,
Michael Sims, Planner (708) 392-6000
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Type of (MW* WWI
New FN* Year CHAS For Final Y ar through Fiscal Year
Annual Update * For Fmcw YZ 19 9 3
^41ft W*
Indial submissid"
Rosubmission
Amondmorlt **
If an Annual Update. mark one:
!r Parts 4 (Resources) & 5 (Implemontatiom) Only
L Parts A & S, PIUS MirlOt changes: (OW% all ft" ~ No*)
Pam I - Needs Assoslurodre Narrative Tablas
Pam 2 - VArMt & Inverl" Comditions NAlra" Tables
Pan 3 - Uateges � Narrau" Tables
** For ad amendments. specify the mature of the arnarditwl below and attach am~ ponorls to this cow sheet.
Jurisdiction HUD Approval
NWM* of AUPORIOW Official: Harm* d Auvwzed Offleal:
Michael E. Janonis, Village Manager
X
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
ANNUAL PLAN FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Cover Sheet
Table of Contents
Annual Plan
1
CHAS Table 3A
5
CHAS Table 313
7
Public Hearing Summary
8
Certification
9
CHAS Development and Citizen Participation Process,
10
Including a Summary of Public Comments and Actions
Taken
General Definitions
13
Local Definitions
20
Racial/ Minority Low Income Concentration Map
21
ANNUAL PLAN
The following Annual Plan identifies the specific actions and resources Mount
Prospect will utilize in Fiscal Year 1993 to accomplish priorities identified in it's CHAS Five
Year Plan.
Priority 1: To provide new construction for housing of elderly low income
residents.
Five Year Results: 50 units of new Section 202 or similar program
units with a Section 8 Set a Side.
One Yegr Investment Plan:In Fiscal Year 1993 the Village will follow
through with it's commitment to Catholic Charities in supporting
their fiscal year 1992 Section 202 application and in providing
a site for the development, as per Resolution 20-92. A Section
8 set a side will be assigned to this project for tenant rental
assistance when the project is completed. There are currently
no funds on hand for this activity. If awarded, funds will be
committed in October of 1992. CDBG funds may be utilized
in the development of this project.
Priority 2: To address the special needs of elderly low income and very
low income residents in various housing settings. -
Five Year Results: 50 units of newly created shared senior housing.
20 units of rehabilitated senior homes.
20 units of Section 8 Existing Housing
Assistance Payment Vouchers or
Certificates and/or HOME rental assistance
payments.
One Year Investment Plan: Village staff will work with the Resource
Center for the Elderly in adding an additional 10 units of senior
shared housing in Mount Prospect. Village efforts will include
providing marketing assistance for the program.
The Village will continue funding it's
Housing Rehabilitation Programs and will investigate ways of
leveraging this CDBG funded program with other funds to
create improved and additional affordable housing. In fiscal
year 1993, 5 elderly homes and 5 non -elderly homes will be
rehabilitated with CDBG funds as part of the Village's larger
program. All recipients are low and moderate income
residents.
Mount Prospect will provide information to
owners or managers of rental properties on Section 8 Existing
Housing Assistance Payment Vouchers or Certificates to
promote the program and work of the Housing Authority of
Cook County in providing additional vouchers in Mount
Prospect.
Priority 3: To provide housing opportunities for first time
homebuyers.
Five Year Results: Assist 20 households in becoming first time
homebuyers.
Qne Year Investment Plan: The Village will work with the Cook
County HOME Consortium in designing and implementing a
first time homebuyers program for 10 low income households
in Mount Prospect. Local private lenders will be sought to
participate in this program. Participation in a homebuyers
educational program will be mandatory for eligible homebuyers.
Priority 4: To promote financial rental assistance programs
throughout the Village.
Five Year Results: Assist the Housing Authority of Cook
County in providing tenant based vouchers and
certificates to low income and very low income Mount
Prospect renters.
One Year Investment Plan: Staff will discuss the availability of
Section 8 certificates and vouchers for Mount Prospect renters
with the Housing Authority of Cook County and provide Section
8 information to owners and managers of 200 rental units in
fiscal year 1993. It will also encourage the creation of a similar
rental assistance program using HOME funds.
Priority 5: To provide financial assistance in the purchase or
rehabilitation of housing for the mentally ill.
Five Year Results: Assist the National Alliance for the Mentally
Ill in purchasing or rehabilitating 5 residential homes for
use as community residences for the mentally ill.
One Year IrLyestment Plan: The National Alliance for the
Mentally Ill has received C.D.B.G. funding for fiscal year 1992
from the Village of Mount Prospect. Additional C.D.B.G. funds
may be requested along with funds from the State of Illinois
Mental Health Department and corporate donations for the
purchase and rehabilitation of 1 residential unit. Supportive
services will be organized with the purchase of the property.
Mount Prospect encourages other entities to apply for housing and housing related
funds and to coordinate ft's activities with the Village and other agencies and institutions.
The Village will support applications from the Housing Authority of Cook for additional
Section 8 Housing Assistance Payment programs as well programs for the remodeling
and repair of their units. likewise, we would generally encourage applications from the
Housing Authority of Cook, local developers, and local private and nonprofit organizations
seeking government funding for expanding and improving affordable housing in Mount
Prospect.
NOTE: Mount Prospect does not have a annual plan for the 'Homeless' category
since it does not have a homeless element in it's Five Year Strategy. Homelessness is
not a priority here since there are very few homeless in the Village.
LCTT* =U 0 •
Assistance to low and moderate income residents in fiscal year 1993 will be
directed where ever such residents live in the Village. Our experience in providing
housing rehabilitation assistance has revealed there are low income and moderate income
residents in virtually every neighborhood. We believe the senior shared housing program
will operate throughout the Village. The bulk of C.D,B.G., Section 8 Existing Housing
Assistance Payments, first time homebuyers program and other forms of housing
assistance will go to Census Tracts 8027.01, 8050.02, 8051.07, 8051.08 and 8051.11.
These areas have been identified in the Village's Five Year CHAS Plan as the areas with
the highest concentrations of minorities and low income households. Please refer to the
Minority/Racial Low Income Concentration Map.
It should be noted that a new Section 202 senior housing development is planned
for the downtown area, which is in Census Tract 8049.01. This site was selected for it's
close proximity to public transportation and other public and private services.
Staff has encouraged the National Alliance for the Mentally III to locate it's proposed
group home in a single family detached home. We believe such a location would be the
best way of meet the housing needs of their residents.
During the coming year the following agencies will deliver and manage the specific
housing assistance programs previously noted:
Priority 1: Section 202 Senior Housing Development - Catholic Charities
Priority 2: Senior Shared Housing - Re -source Center for the Elderly
Senior Housing Rehabilitation - Village of Mount Prospect
Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments - Housing Authority of Cook
Priority 3: First Time Homebuyers Program - County of Cook
Priority 4: Section 8 Housing Assistance Payments - Housing Authority of Cook
HOME Housing Assistance Payments - County of Cook
Priority 5: Group Home for the Mentally III - National Alliance for the Mentally III
Mount Prospect's Five Year CHAS identified a number of public policies and
regulatory areas the Village would evaluate in relation to barriers to affordable housing.
In fiscal year 1993 the Village will consider adopting a new Zoning and Development /
Subdivision Ordinance. Staff will pay close attention to their make-up, especially as they
pertains to health, safety and their impact on the affordability of housing,
In the past year, Mount Prospect has met with various lenders, Northwest Housing
Partnership, CEDA-Northwest and other organizations to plan strategies for bringing more
affordable housing and services into Mount Prospect. Our major institutional problems
are a lack of experience in private / public housing partnerships, the high cost of housing
and the lack of available programs to adequately bring down cost. The Village plans to
continue to work with local lenders and housing organizations on increasing the quality
and supply of affordable housing as units become available.
Mount Prospect does not have public housing projects within it's corporate
boundaries. For this reason, the Village will not take any actions towards public housing
improvements or encourage or initiate any public housing resident initiatives.
In regards to ensuring there is no net loss in the assisted housing inventory, the
Housing Authority of Cook County (PHA) and the Leadership Council for Open
Communities are working together to actually bring more Section 8 certificate holders into
Mount Prospect. The Leadership Council's program provides new Section 8 certificates
to eligible minorities who wish to move into areas with low minority populations. The long
term administration of these certificates is then handled by the PHA. The PHA has
reported that there has been an increase in the number of Section 8 holders in Mount
Prospect and they expect this trend to continue.
Summary of Citizen Comment%
Please refer to CHAS Development and Citizen Participation Process section for a
summary of Citizen comments and the Village's responses and explanations to them.
CHAS Table 3A
Investment Plan
U.S. Depe ""M o" tion" .M
oft* of h -4
Comprehensive Housing AWMabddy Strategy (CHAS)
t. ttfxne x
2. CDOG (S 266 x
3. ESO
4. DOE/01W EAQFW
S. Pubk Hep.
Csmpr*wv*s Grant
6. subww - 266
FsmaAa PFsgrams
cn
s. Compsolve P -w -1M
T. Home
e. Hope 1
9 bops 2
10. Hops 3
11. ESO
12. Tt
P+xrnatwo Hofnfng for
Harfdkepped
14. stw%w"Cars
iS SAFAH
16 Sec 202 Efd"
71
20 1 80
Page 1 0t 2
x
x
x
x
x
Application Submitted 6/24/92 for 7i writ
b ranned f C Count Consortium
1993
Vil
Pld efaN EEpaaed lobe Rwkad OurinQ M FY (i000'e1
Uae at flaec
Amav*FWQ*e
**WMWLvd
Peceh�ed
Plan b
br0lr Eratist
br M.ARIedWw
AP*/
New
flenaf
FtarM 8�L
@1
Lao Ffint Yet
broom
taff nK41 Year
>>'(E)(0)
SU"I
PENAe
CFnebuclbn
AeWNence
MWWanf�
SwMCN
J)
CW)
I }
EON"
I}
A, FomuisiEntlOetnMt,
t. ttfxne x
2. CDOG (S 266 x
3. ESO
4. DOE/01W EAQFW
S. Pubk Hep.
Csmpr*wv*s Grant
6. subww - 266
FsmaAa PFsgrams
cn
s. Compsolve P -w -1M
T. Home
e. Hope 1
9 bops 2
10. Hops 3
11. ESO
12. Tt
P+xrnatwo Hofnfng for
Harfdkepped
14. stw%w"Cars
iS SAFAH
16 Sec 202 Efd"
71
20 1 80
Page 1 0t 2
x
x
x
x
x
Application Submitted 6/24/92 for 7i writ
CHAS Tabu 3A .
Investment Pian - Continued
e. Programs
C lino d
17. Sec. 011 Handicapped x
14. Modrats Rehab SRO j
to Ret" voudws x
20. Remi Cr*ecease x
21. Pubic Housing
Dev iopm.m
22. Pubic Housing W ROP
23. Pubic Housing CLAP
24. OOE0Ohr Energy
ProyrSIM x
rn
25. UHTC x
26. FmHA
27. O*W
2e. O*ier
A MAN,
30. Subtotal 0
Programs
C. 311.1,04of-Fedref 266
X32. ToW - SieM
23.ToW -Loc
34. Tots! - PAvow
3S. ToW -AN Soaaroer 2 6 6
Paye 2 of 2
Mau" Awaked
M hs Jurisdk9on
U" R" Year
Pon a
Apply/
Suix "1
PWwsd Ust of Resouces Espeosd b be RsnNsd dusq iha FY Ii000'sy
Amok" Awaked
by Ova r Em"
Ust Rani Yarn
SUPPINS
AppiU~
"Offer
New
Ranu,
11ame Suyar ft."
Support
Co.."
FunAbre"am*
fi000ay
Aops~
RE NAB
ConavIclbn
Assistance
Assistance Cams
1 I
Savbes
Coeie
($ "ft)
Cruses
A
8
C
O
f
F
8 H
1
J
e. Programs
C lino d
17. Sec. 011 Handicapped x
14. Modrats Rehab SRO j
to Ret" voudws x
20. Remi Cr*ecease x
21. Pubic Housing
Dev iopm.m
22. Pubic Housing W ROP
23. Pubic Housing CLAP
24. OOE0Ohr Energy
ProyrSIM x
rn
25. UHTC x
26. FmHA
27. O*W
2e. O*ier
A MAN,
30. Subtotal 0
Programs
C. 311.1,04of-Fedref 266
X32. ToW - SieM
23.ToW -Loc
34. Tots! - PAvow
3S. ToW -AN Soaaroer 2 6 6
Paye 2 of 2
CHAS Table 38
Goals for Families
to be Assisted with Housing
Name of Jurlsdlcsonisl or Consorsum:
U.S. Department of Nouaing and Urt}sn Devetopment
Office of Coma" Ptam*V and Development
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS)
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois (Member of Cook Countv Consortium)
199'A
Assistance Provided
by Inoorrw Group
Elderly
1162
Member
Households
(A)
Renters
Owners
Homeless
Non -
Homeless
spa"
Needs
(L)
Total
Goals
(Mi
Total
Socilm 215
Goals
(N)
Small
Related
(2 to I)
(B)
Lg9
Related
(5 or more)
(C)
AN Other
Housenolds
(0)
Total
Renters
(E)
ExlsNng
Homeowners
(F)
st,TMne Homebu} s
w+
Children AN others
(6) (H)
Tom
Homeowners
(t)
Individuals
W)
Fad
(K)
1. Yery Low4neome
(0 to 30% of MFQ-
1
1
1
8
1
2. Very Lowartoome
(31 to 507E of MFI)•
3
4
4
9
I. 011w Low4rKxw*e
i
(s t to eox or MFq'
11
10
1
11
3 5�
j
4
13
3 5
i. Tota( low-Inoome
(lines t+ 2+ 3)
15
15
1
16
5
4
10
8
49
w, n appropriate, oases on ttuU mCOM VMS w101 requlred statutory adjustments,
NOTE: Mount Prospect's intent is to place a priority on serving very low-income residents.
Demographic information and our experience shows -we have a much greater number of
other low income residents than very low income.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY
PUBLIC HEARING SUMMARY
The hearing was held at Village Hall on Wednesday, August 5, 1992 at 8:00 p.m.
and was conducted as a part of the regular meeting of the Plan Commission.
April Foley, Human Services Social Worker for Mount Prospect, stated there is a
need for subsidized senior housing and rental payment assistance programs for lower
income families. Mr. Sims noted that Catholic Charities has applied for a Section 202
senior housing construction loan for 75 units in the downtown and that Village staff has
notified apartment owners and managers of the availability of the Section 8 voucher and
certificate programs.
Mid -City Bank representatives stated they were at the hearing to gain information
on the lending needs of the community,
Marlene Gordon, NBD Bank Vice President, stated her bank provides a special first
time homeowners loan and other lending programs and requested a list of contacts the
bank could use in further identifying the community's lending needs. (Mr. Sims sent Mrs.
Gordon the Village's list used in last year's CHAS process as well as one utilized for the
,senior housing letters of recommendation.)
Chairman Weibel presented lending closing information from 1979 and 1992
showing that current closing cost are high. The lenders present stated the documents
presented did not reflect their institutions fees and in fact were not from their banks.
Respectfully Submitted
CER71FICATIONS
The jurisdiction hereby certifies that it will affirmatively further fair housing.
Signature of Authorized Official
Michael 9. Janonis, Village Manager
[;14K04GW*r it91M*I#ZIIIA►
The jurisdiction hereby certifies that it is in compliance with a residential antidisplacement
and relocation assistance plan under section 104(d) of the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1974.
Signature of Authorized Official
Michael E. Jannis, Village Manager
CHAS DEVELOPMENT AND CnIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS
1991
Mount Prospect began it's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) with a
review of the interim rule published in the Federal Register on February 4, 1991. In June
of 1991, staff began assembling CHAS information from three basic sources: The United
States Census of 1980 and 1990, Mount Prospect's Three -Year Housing Assistance Plan
of 1988, and housing related data from experts in the field. On July 10, 1991, the Village
of Mount Prospect Plan Commission held a CHAS hearing in order to receive expert
testimony and comments from the public regarding the need for affordable housing in the
Village. As a result of this public hearing process, information was gathered from the
following sources:
Alliance For The Mentally III
Barrington Area League of Women Voters
CEDA Northwest
Centennial Apartments (Elderly Subsidized Housing)
Cook County Health Department
Countryside Bank
Evangelical Health Systems
First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect
First National Bank of Mount Prospect
Glenkirk (Home for the Developmentally Disabled)
Housing Authority of the County of Cook
Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities
League of Women Voters of Arlington Heights/Mount Prospect/Buffalo Grove
Mid -City National Bank
Mount Prospect Human Services Division
Northeastern Illinois Plan Commission
Northwest Community Services Inc.
Northwest Housing Partnership Inc.
Public Action to Deliver Services (PADS)
Resource Center for the Elderly
State of Illinois
Suburban Area Agency on Aging
Talman Home Federal Savings & Loan Assn.
On August 9, 1991, Village staff sent a survey form to affordable housing related
organizations in Mount Prospect and Cook County. The form asked each organization
to identify what housing services they provide and what, if any, federal housing assistance
programs they would be applying for in the next five years. This information was also
incorporated into the attached Village of Mount Prospect Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy. A second public hearing was held on September 18, 1991 before
the Plan Commission to receive public comments and Commission recommendation for
the final Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy document. The Village Board then
gave final approval of the document during their October 15, 1991 meeting.
09
CHAS DEVELOPMENT AND CITIZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS
1992
Mount Prospect's annual plan was developed with the participation of local institutions and
Village staff. On August 5, 1992 the Village of Mount Prospect Plan Commission held a
public hearing at Mount Prospect Village Hall, 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect,
Illinois, to acquire testimony and information on affordable housing in the Village and
report on the progress that has taken place in meeting identified needs in last year's five
year plan. The public notice regarding the hearing was published in the Daily Herald on
July 17, 1992 and letters announcing the hearing were sent to the following:
Alliance for the Mentally III
Bell Federal Savings
Blue Jay Building Corp.
Catholic Charities
CEDA-Northwest
Centennial Apartments
Countryside Bank
Cragin Federal Bank for Savings
First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect
Glenkirk
Home by Hemphill
Homebuilders Association of Greater Chicago
Housing Authority of Cook County
Huntington Towers Senior Housing
Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities
League of Women Voters
Lexington Homes
Metropolitan Housing Development Corporation
Mid -City National Bank
Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce
NBD Bank
Northeastern Illinois Plan Commission
Northwest Board of Realtors
Northwest Community Services
Northwest Cook Coalition for the Homeless
Northwest Housing Partnership
Northwest Municipal Conference
Public Action to Deliver Shelter (P.A.D.S.)
Savings of America
Shelter Inc.
Suburban Area Agency on Aging
Talman Home Federal Savings and Loan
Village of Mount Prospect Human Services Division
We would note that ten additional organizations concerned with affordable housing were
sent letters this year in an attempt to broaden public participation in the CHAS process.
11
During the hearing, staff had available the Village's CHAS Five Year Plan and provided a
summary of accomplishments over the past year.
The only suggestions received during the hearing were from April Foley, Mount Prospect
Human Services Social Worker, who said there is a need for more senior subsidized
housing and rental payment assistance. Mr. Sims reported that Catholic Charities has
submitted an application for a new 75 unit senior housing development for downtown
Mount Prospect and that the Planning Department has sent letters to Village apartment
owners and managers to encourage them to participate in the Section 8 Housing
Assistance Payment program.
Representatives from Mid -City National Bank and NBD Bank at Randhurst Shopping
Center were also present and asked how they could help through the Community
Reinvestment Act guidelines and for a copy of the annual CHAS update,
Staff recently received other recommendation from various agencies. The Northeastern
Illinois Plan Commission's letter affirmed their prior year's recommendation to build more
affordable housing for household's working in Mount Prospect. Catholic Charities and
Mount Prospect's Human Services Division noted a large and growing need for more
affordable apartments for families with children and the elderly and suggested making
more Section 8 certificate and vouchers available and encouraging more apartment
owners to participate in the Section 8 program as a solution to the problem. The National
Alliance for the Mentally III has informed staff there continues to be a great need for
housing for the mentally ill. Staff reported to these agencies that their recommendations
and concerns were being addressed in the CHAS. The need for affordable housing for
employees, the elderly, low income families with children, the mentally ill and the homeless
and near homeless is being addressed by a proposed Section 202 senior housing
development, new Section 8 Existing Housing Assistance Payments requests, senior
shared housing units, the rehabilitation of existing homes, a proposed first time
homebuyers program and a group home for the mentally ill.
The Village Plan Commission met on Wednesday, September 2, 1992 and voted ... in
favor of recommending approval of the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
Annual Plan for Fiscal Year 1993. The Plan was then sent to the Village Board and
approved on September 15, 1992 by a vote of ...
M
'91111F-1119- T ---I
LUILI M1 I
GENERAL DEFINITIONS USED WITH THE CHAS
AfToLdable Housing Affordable housing is generally defined as housing where the occupant is
paying no more than 30 percent of gross income for gross housing costs, including utility costs.
AIDS and Related Diseases: The disease of acquired immunodeficiency syndrome or Any
conditions arising from the etiologic agent for acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.
Alcoholl0ther Drug Addiction: A serious and persistent alcohol or other drug addiction that
significantly limits a person's ability to live independently.
Assisted Household or Person: For the purpose of specifying one-year goals for assisting
households or persons, a household or person is assisted if, during the coming Federal fiscal year,
they will benefit through one or more Programs included in,the jurisdiction's investment plan. A
renter is benefitted if the person takes occupancy of affordable housing that is newly acquired,
newly rehabilitated, or newly constructed, and/or receives rental assistance. An existing
homeowner is benefitted during the year if the home's rehabilitation is completed. A first-time
homebuyer is benefitted if a home is purchased during the year. A homeless person is benefitted
during the year if the person becomes an occupant of transitional or permanent housing.
Households or persons who will benefit from more than one program activity must be counted
only once. To be included in the goals, the housing unit must, at a minimum, satisfy the HUD
Section 8 Housing Quality Standards (see section 882.109). See also, instructions for completing
Table 3A of the CHAS and Table I of the Annual Performance Report. I
CQmmitted: Generally means there has been a legally binding commitment of funds to a specific
project to undertake specific activities.
Consistent with the CHAS: A determination made by the jurisdiction that a program application
meets the following criterion: The Annual Plan for that fiscal year's funding indicates the
jurisdiction's planned to,apply for the program or was willing to support an application by another
entity for the program; the activities serve the geographic area designated in the plan; and the
activities benefit a category of residents for which the jurisdiction's rive -year strategy shows a
priority.
Cost Burden > 30% : The extent to which gross housing costs, including utility costs, exceed 30
percent of gross income, based on data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Cost Burden > 50% (Severe Cost Burden): The extent to which gross housing costs, including
utility costs, exceed 50 percent of gross income, based on data published by the U.S. Census
Bureau.
Disabled Household: A household composed of one or more persons at least one of whom is an
adult (a person of at least 18 years of age) who has a disability. A person shall be considered to
have a disability if the person is determined to have a physical, mental or emotional impairment
13
that: (1) is expected to be of long -continued and indefinite duration, (2) substantially impeded his
or her ability to live independently, and (3) is of such a nature that the ability could be improved
by more suitable housing conditions. A person shall also be considered to have a disability if he
or she has a developmental disability as defined in the Developmental Disabilities Assistance and
Bill of Rights Act (42 U.S.C. 6001-6006). The term also includes the surviving member or
members of any household described in the first sentence of this paragraph who were living in an
assisted unit with the deceased member of the household at the time of his or her death.
Economic Indetiendence and Self -Sufficiency Pr„ ams: Programs undertaken by Public Housing
Agencies (PHAs) to promote economic independence and self-sufficiency for participating
families. Such programs may include Project Self -Sufficiency and Operation Bootstrap programs
that originated under earlier Section 8 rental certificate and rental voucher initiatives, as well as
the Family Self -Sufficiency program. In addition, PHAs may operate locally -developed programs
or conduct a variety of special projects designed to promote economic independence and self
sufficiency,
Elderly Household: A family in which the head of the household or spouse is at least 62 years of
age.
Msting Homeowner: An owner -occupant of residential property who holds legal title to the
property and who uses the property as his/her principal residence.
Family. A household comprised of one or more individuals. (The National Affordable Housing
Act (NAFTA) definition required to be used in the CHAS rule - equivalent to Census definition of
household.) The Bureau of Census defines a family as a householder (head of household) and
one or more other persons living in the same household who are related by birth, marriage or
adoption. The term "household" is used in combination with the term "related" in the CHAS
instructions, such as for Table 2, when compatibility with the Census definition of family (for
reports and data available from the Census based upon that definition) is dictated. (See also
"Homeless Family").
Family Self -Sufficiency (FSS) Program: A program enacted by Section 554 of the National
Affordable Housing Act which directs Public Housing Agencies (PHAs) and Indian Housing
Authorities (IHAs) to use Section 8 assistance under the rental certificate and rental voucher
programs, together with public and private resources to provide supportive services, to enable
participating families to achieve economic independence and self-sufficiency.
Federal Preference for Admission The preference given to otherwise eligible applicants under
HUD's rental assistance programs who, at the time they seek housing assistance, are involuntarily
displaced, living in substandard housing, or paying more than 50 percent of family income for rent.
(See, for example, section 882.219.)
First -Time Homebuyer: An individual or family who has not owned a home during the three-year
Period preceding the HUD -assisted purchase of a home that must be used as the principal
residence of the homebuyer.
FmHA: The Farmers Home Administration, or programs it administers.
or Rent. Year round housing units which are vacant and offered/available for rent. (U.S.
Census definition)
14
pr Sale: Year round housing units which are vacant and offered/available for sale only. (U.S.
Census definition)
Frail Elderly: An elderly person who is unable to perform at least 3 activities of daily living (i.e.,
eating, dressing, bathing, grooming, and household management activities). (See Section 889.105.)
Group uarters: Facilities providing living quarters that are not classified as housing units. (U.S.
Census definition). Examples include: prisons, nursing homes, dormitories, military barracks, and
shelters.
HOME: The HOME Investment Partnerships Act, which is Title II of the National Affordable
Housing Act.
Homeless Family: Family that includes at least one parent or guardian and one child under the
age of 18, a homeless pregnant woman, or a homeless person in the process of securing legal
custody of a person under the age of 18.
Homeless Individual: An unaccompanied youth (17 years or under) or an adult (18 years or
older) without children.
Homeless Youth: Unaccompanied person 17 years of age or under who is living in situations
described by terms "sheltered" or "unsheltered".
HOPE 1: The HOPE for Public and Indian Housing Homeownership Program, which is Title IV,
Subtitle A of the National Affordable Housing Act.
HOPE 2: The HOPE for Homeownership of Multifamily Units Program, which is Title IV,
Subtitle B of the National Affordable Housing Act.
HOPE 3: The HOPE for Homeownership of Single Family Homes Program, which is Title IV,
Subtitle C of the National Affordable Housing Act.
ousehold: One or more persons occupying a housing unit (U.S. Census definition). See also
"Family".
Housing Problems: Households with housing problems include those that: (1) occupy units
meeting the definition of Physical Defects; (2) meet the definition of overcrowded; and (3) meet
the definition of cost burden > 30%. Table 1C requests nonduplicative counts of households that
meet one or more of these criteria.
Housing Unit: An occupied or vacant house, apartment, or a single room (SRO housing) that is
intended as separate living quarters. (U.S. Census definition)
Institutions/Institutional: Group quarters for persons under care or custody. (U.S. Census
definition)
Large Related: A household of 5 or more persons which includes at least 2 related persons
15
LIHTC: (Federal) Low Income Housing Tax Credit.
Low -Income: Households whose incomes do not exceed 80 percent of the median income for the
area. as determined by HUD with adjustments for smaller and larger families. except that HUD
may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 80 percent of the median for the area on the
basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of prevailing levels of
construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family incomes. NOTE: HUDincome limits are updated annually and are available from local HUD offices for the appropriate
jurisdictions. (This term corresponds to low- and moderate -income households in the CDBG
Program.)
Moderate Income: Households whose incomes are between 81 percent and 95 percent of the
median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller or larger
families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 95 percent of the
median for the area on the basis of HUD's findings that such variations are necessary because of
prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents, or unusually high or low family
incomes. (This definition is unique to the CHAS.)
tion -Elderly Household: A household which does not meet the definition of "Elderly Household,"
as defined above.
Non -Homeless Persons with Special Needs: Includes frail elderly persons, persons with AIDS,
disabled families, and families participating in organized programs to achieve economic self-
sufficiency.
'tion -Institutional: Group quarters for persons not under care or custody. (U.S. Census definition
used)
Occu ied Housi Unit: A housing unit that is the usual place of residence of the occupant(s).
Other Household: A household of one or more persons that does not meet the definition of a
Small Related household or a Large Related household, or is an elderly household comprised of 3
or more persons.
Other income: Households whose incomes exceed 80 percent of the median income for the area,
as determined by the Secretary, with adjustments for smaller and larger families.
Other Low -Income: Households whose incomes are between 51 percent and 80 percent of the
median income for the area, as determined by HUD, with adjustments for smaller and larger
families, except that HUD may establish income ceilings higher or lower than 80 percent of the
median for the area on the basis of HUD's Findings that such variations are necessary because of
prevailing levels of construction costs or fair market rents. or unusually high or low family
incomes. (This term corresponds to moderate -income in the CDBG Program.)
Other Vacant: Vacant year round housing units that are not For Rent. For Sale, or Vacant
Awaiting Occupancy or Held. (U.S. Census definition)
Overcrowded: A housing unit containing more than one person per room. (U.S. Census
definition)
16
Owner: A household that owns the housing unit it occupies. (U.S. Census definition)
Phvsical Defects: A housing unit lacking complete kitchen or bathroom (U.S. Census definition),
Jurisdictions may expand upon the Census definition.
Proiect•Based ('Rental) Assistance: Rental Assistance provided for a project, not for a specific
tenant. Tenants receiving project -based rental assistance give up the right to that assistance upon
moving from the project.
Public Housing CIAP: Public Housing Comprehensive Improvement Assistance Program.
Public Housing.MROP: Public Housing Major Reconstruction of Obsolete Projects.
Rent Burden > 30111c (Cost Burden): The extent to which gross rents. including utility costs,
exceed 30 percent of gross income. based on data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Rent Burden > 50% (Severe Cost burden): The extent to which gross rents, including utility
costs. exceed 50 percent of gross income, based on data published by the U.S. Census Bureau.
Renter: A household that rents the housing unit it occupies, including both units rented for cash
and units occupied without cash payment of rent. (.U.S. Census definition)
Renter Occupied Unit: Any occupied housing unit that is not owner occupied, including units
rented for cash and those occupied without payment of cash rent.
aection 215: Section 215 of Title Il of the National Affordable Housing Act. Section 215 defines
what constitutes "affordable" housing projects under the Title II HOME program.
Service Needs: The particular services identified for special needs populations. which typically
may include transportation, personal care. housekeeping, counseling, meals. case management.
personal emergency response, and other services to prevent premature institutionalization and
assist individuals to continue living independently.
Severe Cost Burden: See Cost Burden > 50 o.
Severe Mental 111ness A serious and persistent mental or emotional impairment that significantly
limits a person's ability to live independently.
Sheltered: Families and persons whose primary nighttime residencc is a supervised publicly or
privately operated shelter, including emergency shelters, transitional housing for the homeless,
domestic violence shelters, residential shelters for runaway and homeless youth, and any
hotel,'motel/apartment voucher arrangement paid because the person is homeless. This term does
not include persons living doubled up or in overcrowded or substandard conventional housing.
Any facility offering permanent housing is not a shelter, nor are its residents homeless.
Small Related- A household of 2 to 4 persons which includes at least two related persons.
Substandard Condition and not Suitable for Rehab: By local definition, dwelling units that are in
such poor condition as to be neither structurally nor financially feasible for rehabilitation.
17
Substandard Condition but Suitable for Rehab: By local definition. dwelling units that do not
meet standard conditions but are both financially and structurally feasible for rehabilitation. This
does not include units that require only cosmetic work. correction or minor livability problems or
maintenance work. The jurisdiction must define this term (i.e.. standard condition. Financially and
structurally feasible for rehab) and include this definition in the Appendix (Glossary of Terms)
portion of its CHAS submission.
Substantial Amendment: A major change in a housing strategy submitted between scheduled
annual submissions. It will usually involve a change to the five-year strategy, which may be
occasioned by a decision to undertake activities or programs inconsistent with that strategy.
Substantial Rehabilitation: Rehabilitation of residential property at an average cost for the
project in excess of 525.000 per dwelling unit.
Sup2ortive Housing: Housing, including Housing Units and Group Quarters. that have a
supportive environment and includes a planned service component.
Supportive Service Need in FSS Plan: The plan that PHAs administering a Family Self -
Sufficiency program are required to develop to identify the services they will provide to
participating families and the source of funding for those services. The supportive services may
include child care: transportation; remedial education: education for completion of secondary or
post secondary schooling; job training, preparation and counseling; substance abuse treatment and
counseling; training in homemaking and parenting skills. money management,' and household
management; counseling in homeownership; job development and placement; follow-up assistance
after job placement; and other appropriate services.
Supportive Services: Services provided to residents of supportive housing for the purpose -of
facilitating the independence of residents. Some examples are case management. medical or
psychological counseling and supervision. child care, transportation, and job training.
Tenant Assistance: Rental assistance payments provided as either project -based rental assistance
or tenant -based rental assistance.
Tenant -Based (Rental) Assistag&: A form of rental assistance in which the assisted tenant may
move from a dwelling unit with a right to continued assistance. The assistance is provided for the
tenant, not for the project.
TotalVacant Housing Units: Unoccupied year round housing units. (U.S. Census definition)
Unsheltered: Families and individuals whose primary nighttime residence is a public or private
place not designed for, or ordinarily used as, a regular sleeping accommodation for human beings
(e.g., streets, parks, alleys, etc.).
Vacant Awaiting Occupancv or Held: Vacant year round housing units that have been rented or
sold and are currently awaiting occupancy, and vacant year round housing units that are held by
owners or renters for occasional use. (U.S. Census definition)
Vacant Housing Unit: Unoccupied year-round housing units that are available or intended for
occupancy at any time during the year.
18
Very Low -Income: Households whose incomes do not exceed 50 percent of the median area
income for the area, as determined by HUD. with adjustments for smaller and larger families and
for areas with unusually high or low incomes or where needed because of prevailing levels of
construction costs or fair market rents. (This term corresponds to low-income households in the
CDBG Program.),
Worst -Case Needs: Unassisted. very low-income renter households who pay more than half of
their income for rent. live in seriously substandard housing (which includes homeless people) or
have been involuntarily displaced.
Year hound Housin Units: Occupied and vacant housing units intended for year round use.
(U.S. Census definition). Housing units for seasonal or migratory use are excluded.
NOTE: Terms not defined above may be defined in the specific instructions for each table. If a
term is not defined, the jurisdiction is to provide its own definition.
19
LOCAL DEFINITIONS
Area of Low Income Concentration: A census tract or subpart of a census tract where
at least 25% of the households have incomes that do not exceed Section 8 Existing
Housing Assistance Payment Program limits.
Area of Racial/Ethnic Minority Concentration: See Minority Concentration.
Minority: HUD's current minority household categories, which are at this time includes:
Black,not Hispanic; Asian or Pacific Islander; American Indian or Alaskan and
Hispanic.
Minority Concentrations: A census tract in the Village of Mount Prospect where the racial/
minority population represents more than 10% of the total population in the tract.
Needing Rehab: A building or structure that does not meet the Mount Prospect
Code or Housing Quality Standards (HOS).
Near Homeless: A person, family or household whose monthly income is less than 50%
of the current Section 8 Rental Assistance Program median income and whose total
monthly housing cost exceed 50% of their monthly income. -
Not Rehabbable: A substandard building or structure whose combined current value and
the estimated cost of rehabilitation would exceed the estimated market value of the
home after rehabilitation.
Standard Condition: A property that meets Village of Mount Prospect Code and Housing
Quality Standard (HQS).
Substandard Condition But Suitable For Rehabilitation: A Property that does not meet
Housing Quality Standards (HOS) or the Mount Prospect Village Code.
W
THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
21
CAF/ 9/10/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING THE ANNUAL
COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY FOR 1993
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of Community
Development Block Grant funds; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has prepared a Comprehensive
Housing Affordability Strategy which identifies the housing needs
of low and moderate -income residents, as well as those of special
groups; and
WHEREAS,, in conjunction with the Comprehensive Housing
Affordability strategy program, the needs of the community must be
reviewed and updated on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect has
reviewed the following priority areas proposed Comprehensive
Housing Affordability Strategy for 1993.
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect has
determined that the comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
for 1993 is consistent with the Five Year plan, as established by
the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
through the adoption of Resolution 38-91.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby support the following housing
affordability priority areas identified for the year 1993:
To continue to work with Catholic Charities in the development
of a senior citizen's housing apartment development in the
downtown area;
To address the special needs of elderly low-income and very -
low -income residents by promoting a shared senior housing
program, rehabilitating senior citizen homes and by using
rental assistance payment programs;
To provide housing opportunities for first time home buyers by
working with local private lenders and Cook County in
assembling financial packages and educational programs to
assist low income households to purchase residential homes;
To identify the promotion of financial rental assistance
programs using HUD Section 8 certificates and voucher programs
as well as using funds from the HOME Program; and
To provide financial assistance for the purchase or
rehabilitation of housing for the mentally ill.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
I
CHAS
Page 2 of 2
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
. 1992.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
q �s'
TO: MICHAEL E. JANONIS VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS� r, IRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 8, 1992
SUBJECT. HOME CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT
The attached Resolution is being presented to the Village Board in order to satisfy HUD
contracting agreement requirements. On February 18, 1992, the Village Board passed
Resolution 5-92 which authorized the execution of a, HOME Investment Partnership
Consortium Agreement.
In March, HUD decided that it did not want to review eleven individual consortium
agreement between various municipalities and Cook County. They decided the proper
format would be a single agreement signed by eleven municipalities. The agreement with
eleven individual signature pages was executed in May of 1992 and is attached. Now HUD
is asking that a new Resolution approving this new single agreement format be approved
by each municipality.
DMC:hg
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE
COOK COUNTY HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP CONSORTIUM
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined
that it would be in the best interest of the Village to cooperate with the County of Cook
in the HOME Investment Partnership Consortium in an effort to provide an opportunity for
affordable housing for residents of said Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the previous execution by the Mayor and Village Clerk of the
amended version of the HOME Consortium Agreement dated March 16, 1992 be and is
hereby authorized and ratified.
SEC! ISN TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
Exhibit A
ROME Investment Partnerships
Consortium Agreement
THIS AGREEMENT entered into this 16th day of March , 1992 by and between County
of Cook, a body politic and corporate of the State of Illinois (the "County") and
the villages of Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect, Oak Park, Schaumburg, and
Skokie; the Cities of Berwyn, Chicago Heights, Des Plaines and Evanston; and the
Town of Cicero, Illinois municipal corporations (the "Municipalities").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Cranston -Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act ("the Act") providing federal financial assistance for the
support of affordable housing as identified in Title II—Investment in Affordable
Housing of HOME Investment Partnerships Act; and
WHEREAS, the Act makes possible the allocation of funds to the County for the
purpose of undertaking affordable housing activities identified in the Act; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Municipalities have determined that joint action is
the most effective way to accomplish the purposes.of said Act; and
WHEREAS, units of local government have had conferred upon them the following
powers by Article VII, Section 10(a) of the 1970 Constitution of the State of
Illinois:
*Units of local government and school districts may contract or otherwise associate among themselves, with the State, with other states
and their units local of government and school districts, and with the United States to obtain or sham services and to exercise,
combine or transfer any power or function, in any manner root prohibited by law or by ordinance. Units of local government and
school districts may contract and otherwise associate with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited
by low or by ordinance. participating units of government may use their credit, revenues, and other resources to pay costs and to
service debt related to intergovernmental activities.% and I
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, (Illinois Revised Statutes,
Chapter 127, Section 741 et sect•) enacted by the State of Illinois provides in
part as follows:
'Section 743. Intergovernmental Agreements. Any power or powers, privileges or authority exercised or which may be exercised
by a public agency of this State may be exercised and enjoyed jointly with any other public agency of this State and jointly with any
public agency of any other gate or of the United States, to the extent that laws of such other state or of the United States do not
prohibit joint exercise or enjoyment.'
'Section 745. littergovertuntmal Contracts. Any one or more public agencies may contract with any one or mom other public
agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is
authorized by law to parlbrut provided that such contract shall be authorized by the governing body of each party to the contract.
Such contract shall 3d forth fully the purposes, powers, rights, objectives and responsibilities of the contracting parties.% and
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement have had conferred upon them the exercise
of powers authorized in Chapters 24 and 34 of the Illinois Revised Statues (known
as the "Illinois Municipal Code" and the "Counties Code" respectively);
NOW, THEREFORE, upon the consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and upon the further consideration of the recitals hereinabove set forth, it is
hereby agreed between the County and the Municipalities hereto, as follows:
A. That the recitals hereinabove set forth are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully not forth herein.
H. That the Cook County HOME Investment Partnerships Consortium (the
"Consortium") is defined to include as members of the Consortium the County; the
Villages of Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect, Oak Park, Schaumburg, and Skokie;
the Cities of Berwyn, Chicago Heights, Des Plaines and Evanston; and the Town of
Cicero.
C. That the Municipalities and the County hereby agree to cooperate to
undertake and/or to assist in undertaking housing assistance activities in order
to alleviate housing problems through the HOME Investment Partnerships Program
(hereafter referred to as the HOME Program) in cooperation with the Consortium;
and
D. That the Municipalities hereby authorize the County to act in a
representative capacity as the lead entity for the members of the Consortium for
purposes of the HOME Program; and
E. That the Municipalities agree that the County will assume overall
responsibility as the lead entity to ensure that the Consortium's HOME Program
is carried out in compliance with the requirements of the Program, including
requirements concerning a Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS).
It is mutually understood, however, that the County is responsible for
implementation of the HOME Program and that the Municipalities remain fully
responsible for implementation of any other funding which the Municipalities
receive directly from federal, state, or local programs which may be identified
in the CHAS as it pertains to the Municipalities identified needs and priorities.
F. That the Municipalities agree to evidence their consent to participation
in the Consortium by providing the County with two certified copies of a
Resolution from the governing body of each Municipality that the Chief Executive
Officer of the Municipality is authorized to sign this Consortium Agreement; and
G. That the signatures of said Chief Executive Officers will be affixed to
this Agreement evidencing the willingness of the Municipalities to participate
in the Consortium, and to cooperate in the implementation of the Cook County
Consortium for HOME.
H. That the County agrees to evidence its consent to participation in the
Consortium by providing the Municipalities with two certified copies of a
Resolution from the governing body of the County that the Chief Executive Officer
of the County is authorized to sign this Consortium agreement; and
I. That the signature of said Chief Executive Officer will be affixed to this
Agreement evidencing the willingness of the County to participate in the
Consortium.
J. Further, that a copy of this Consortium Agreement signed by the Chief
Executive Officer of the County will be provided to the Municipalities.
R. That the Municipalities and County agree to affirmatively further fair
housing; and
L. That the term of this Agreement is for a period of not less than the period
necessary to carry out all activities that will be funded from funds awarded for
Federal Fiscal Year PY93 (commencing October 1, 1992 and ending September 30,
1993) and that the signatories to this Agreement are required to remain in the
Consortium through the period ending September 30, 1993.
M. That this Agreement shall be effective as of March 16, 1992 and that the
Agreement can be executed in counterparts.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed by their duly designated officials.
COUNTY 0 ILLINOIS
BY:
TITLE: President
ATTEST:✓
Zo-unty t�ferk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
As istan Sta e's Attorney
DATE:
ATTEST:
County Clerk
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant State's Attorney
K
i
Village of hrlington Heights
BY:
WILLIAM MAKI
TITLE: VILLAGE PRESIDENT
DATE:
05118/92
ATTEST:
Village cle�rk
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
. p, Attorney
City of Be
BY:
TITLE: MAY 0 9
DATE: 5- - 2-G - � 2 -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
TITLE:
DATE:
Village of Mount Prospect
ATTEST: 27,1��'w
Village Clerk
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Village of Oak Park
BY:iN
TITLE:
DATE:
ATTEST:
ak
village ,clack
SEAL:
r
APPROVED AS TO FORM: A j
V of §chaumburg
BY: a
TITLE: e C;
DATE: j21 --a /51z
ATTEST: &,Xt/ )w f),. I�z
Village C1 rk
SEAL,
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Wu-nipal Attorney
Village of Skokie
BY:
TITLE: Mayor
DATE: May 20, 1992
ATTEST: .1�
x age clerk
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: r
Mun�czpa Attorney
City of Chicago Heights
BY:
TITLE: Mayor
DATE: May 18, 1992
ATTEST:
/ -City Cler�
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mu v al Attorney I
10
City of Dee Plaineo
TITLE:
DATE:
ATTEST:
C fy Clerk
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM: Aya&y;;� X. A�dtltam-
VnICIpal Attorney
11
City — of --glAaglon
BY:
TITLE: M*,Y'04
DATE.
ATTEST:19
l/ 4MIll✓ it 7:
City trer)c
SEAL. -
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Mun a Attorney
12
Town of Cicero
BY:
TITLE: 92tLIPA
DATE: #
&
ATTEST:
4
Town Clerk
SEAL:
"PROVED AS TO FORM:
Municipal Attorney
13
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: EMD PLAZA
LOCATION: 301 E. RAND
DATE: AUGUST 31, 1992
YES No
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING^
APPROVAL:. -
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
PUBLIr, IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
WATER MAIN FT. SIZE
SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE
STORM SEWER FT. SIZE
ROADWAYS
SIDEWALKS 1700 SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS
STREET LIGHTS #
PARKWAY TREES #___
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING COMPLETE
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER 3691 - "
ROADWAY -
PARKING LOTS 1272.61 SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING COMPLETE ---
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
AREAS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 1992 .
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECr, ILLINOIS 60M
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerki,.-�--
FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE: September 9, 1992 SEP 10 1992
SUBJECT: RAND PLAZA - 301 E. RAND ROAD
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project, The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
JAW/m
Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois 49�
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 10, 1992
SUBJECT: - POLICE AND FIRE HEADQUARTERS -
FURNITURE BIDS
Attached please find a series of memoranda from Project Coordinator Joseph Kolanowski
and Donohue covering the results of the recent, bid opening for furnishings for the Police
and Fire Headquarters building. As you can see, Donohue is recommending that the
Village reject the bid submitted by Henricksen & Company as being non-responsive and
accept the second low bid from Interiors 2000, Inc., whose bid meets all specifications
and is still approximately $8,000 under the revised Furnishings Budget.
Mr. Kolanowski's memorandum is designed to give you an ideaof what the initial
specification process entailed. As you can see, it was very thorough and the furnishings
utilized at the Public Works facility were used as a benchmark in terms of price and
quality.
Also included in your packet is a portion of the bid specification which lists the various
items of furniture. This is included to give you an idea of the types of items being
purchased.
Assuming acceptance of the bid from Interiors 2000, Inc., staff will revisit the entire
furniture list to make sure that adequate need has been established for each item.
Additionally, it should be noted that a fair quantity of furniture and equipment located
at the original facilities will be reused in the new structure. Those items which cannot
be reused will be made available to other portions of the Police and Fire operations and
then to other Departments.
Mi ONIS
MEJ/rcc
c: Project Coordinator Joseph Kolanowski
Fire Chief Edward Cavello
Police Chief Ronald Pavlock
A SEC DoNoHu
Environment & Intrastructure
August 21, 1992
Mr. Michael E. Jannis, Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois_60056
Re: New Public Safety Facility
Donohue Project No. 18259.402
Dear Mr. Jannis:
On Thursday, August 13, 1992, bids were received for Furnishings for the Mount Prospect
Public Safety Facility, and are listed as follows:
Henricksen & Company, Inc. $369,868.00
Interiors 2000, Inc. $376,647.00
Thomas Interior Systems, Inc. $390,812.02
Corporate Office Systems $448,085.42
We are pleased to report that the two lowest bids fall below the recently revised budget of
$385,000.00.
Our review of the bids revealed that the lowest bid, submitted by Henricksen & Company,
was based on unauthorized substitutions of two major categories of furniture, i.e. seating
and moveable partitions. During the furniture selection and specification process these
substituted items were not acceptable to the Village staff. In addition, the clear violation of
bidding procedures by these substitutions makes their bid not responsive. We therefore
recommend that this bid not be accepted.
The second lowest bid, by Interiors 2000, which is $6,779 (1.8%) higher, conforms to all
specified requirements, and the bidder is a reputable firm.
It is our recommendation that the contract for Furnishings for the Public Safety Facility be
awarded to Interiors 2000, Inc. for the base bid amount of $376,647.00.
1501 Woodfield Road - Suite 200 East • Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 • (708) 605-8800 • Fax: (708) 605-8914 f.0
Mr. Michael E. Jannis
August 21, 1992
Page 2
We await your directions and look forward to continuing to assist you in the successful
completion of the project.
Sincerely,
SEC DONOHUE INC.
Fred JJoo�rich, A.LA.
Vice President
Naras Statkus
Project Manager
FJB:NS:dk
cc: Cmdr. Joseph C. Kolanowski
Village of Mt. Prospect
T/L/VN4
Ll
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JANONIS W
FROM: COMMANDER KOLANOWSKI �11--
SUBJECT: NEW BUILDING FURNITURE '9ELECTION PROCESS
DATE: 9 SEPTEMBER 1992
The following process was used to determine the furniture
requirements for the new Police and Fire Headquarters building:
1. Initially the Police and Fire chiefs met with their respective
staffs and analyzed their existing furniture, operations, and the
need for new furniture type equipment. At the same time Donohue
and Associates assigned Naras Statkus, our architect, and Joe Hess,
their furnishings expert, to conduct a furniture needs assessment.
2. Police and Fire representatives met with Herb Weeks, Naras
Statkus, and Joe Hess. The committee inspected the furnishing in
the new Public Works building and it was determined that Donohue
and Associates would specify equipment similar to the quality of
the furnishings that were purchased for the Public Works building.
The furnishings to be specified in the bid document were to be
functional, sturdy, reasonably priced, and of a quality that would
insure that the furniture would last for a number of years with
little or no maintenance.
3. The entire committee visited the Merchandise Mart in Chicago
and viewed the various lines of equipment that were available.
4. The Police and Fire committee members examined Zill pieces of
existing furniture to determine what, if any, items could be reused
in the new building. A quantity of file cabinets, storage
cabinets, desks, tables, and chairs were determined to be in
reusable shape.
5. The entire committee again met and after reviewing the reusable
items they were put into the building layout and their
corresponding items were removed from the bid document.
6. The final bid specifications were prepared by Donohue and
Associates, the project was put out for bid, and you now have the
bid results.
It should be noted that the members of the committee were guided
through the entire process by Mr. Herb Weeks. Between each of the
above major steps there were numerous meetings and phone
conversations between Police and Fire representatives, Mr. Weeks,
and the representatives of Donohue and Associates.
V#'JK\WP\8U%LD\MRJFURNj
FURNISHING SPECIFICATIONS
TYPICAL KEY TO FURNITURE QUANTITY, LOCATION, COLOR:
(1) 111 A
Quantity
Room Number Upholstery, Finish
UPHOLSTERY & FINISHES SCHEDULE:
A - Herman Miller - Hopsak - Navy #4441
B - Herman Miller - Hopsak - Burgundy #4437
C - Herman Miller - Hopsak - Camel Light #4464
D - Maytine - Hamilton - Bluestone #107
E - Mayline - Hamilton - Burgundy #103
F - Kimball _ Glasgow - Onyx #2317
G - Wilsonart - Planked Village Oak #7807-13
H - National - Medium Oak Plastic Laminate or Veneer
I - National - Medium Cherry Plastic Laminate or Veneer
J - Howe - #346 Natural Oak Top and Wood Blillnose Edges, Folkstone Base
K - Howe - #509 Medium Cherry Top and Wood Bullnose Edges, Folkstone Base
L - National - Midnight Black Chassis, Medium Oak Top
M - National - Midnight Black Chassis, Medium Cherry Top
N - National - Pearl White
0 - National - MB - Midnight Black
P - National - CP - Champagne
Q - Edsal - Black
R - Edsal - Tan
Q -Herman Miller lier - Solid vertical Surface Fabric - Light Tone #3863
T - Herman Miller - Laminate Tops - Light Tone (LT)
U - Herman Miller - Cool Tone (CT)
V - Herman Miller - Top and End Caps - Light Tone (LT)
W - Herman Miller - Top and End Caps - Flipper Door Faces and Pedestal Faces - Dark
Mahogany
X - Wilsonart - Windsor Mahogany #7039-13
Y - La-Z-Bov Apex, Grade F, F159660 Ranchero
Z - Kimball - Wool Tex - Maroon #1135
-All locking key systems will be on separate master keys for file cabinets, desks...etc. To be
coordinated between furniture contractor and owner.
SC -1. Stacker Chair
American Seating - Acton Stacker Chairs -armless sled base with glides, chrome
frame.
Model:
8720-F Model: 8720-R
Key:
(24) B05 (12) 235 Key: (7)262
(8) B11 (12)238
Id
(1) B23
(4) B25
SC -2. Stacker Chair
American Seating
- Acton Stacker Chair -with arms sled base with glides, chrome
frame
Model:
8710 -W -DK
Key:
(50) 157 (3) 130 (4) 137 (4)232
(3) 171 (3) 131 (3) 140
(3)125 (3) 132 (4)225
TC -i. Task Chair
Herman Miller
- Ergon Task Chair -adjustable back height, without arms, with
casters
Model:
ER365FRHFCAHF
Key:
(4) B21 A (1) 127 A (6) 134 A (4) 241 B
(2) B16 A (1) 128 A (8) 137 A (1) 249 B
(1) B15 A (1) 130 A (1) 149 A (1) 257 B
(1) 123 A (1) 131 A (8) 149 A
(1) 125 A (1) 132 A (10) 230 A
TC -2. Task Chair
Herman Miller - Ergon Task Chair -adjustable back height, with arms, with
casters
Model:
ER360FRHFCAHF-MT
Key:
(3) 161 B (2) 253 B
(2) 160 B
(2) 273 B
(2) 258 B
77 -
TC -3. Task Chair
Herman Miller - Ergon Task Chairs -adjustable back height, with arms
Model: ER360FRHFFGHFMT
Key: (2) 262 B
(1) 252 B
TC -5. Task Chair
Herman Miller - Equa Work Chair -low back -split upholstered without arms,
with casters
Model: EQ235SFRMTMTCA
Key: (1) 243 B
MC -1. Manager Chair
Herman Miller - Ergon Manager Chair -adjustable back height with arms, with
casters
Model: ER210FRHFCAHFMiT
Key: (3) 103 A (1) 211 A (1) 239 B
(1) 136 A (2) 214 A (1) 242 B
(1) 148 A (1) 217 A (1) 244 B
(1) 228 A (1) 227 A (1) 258 A
(1) 202 A (2) 248 B
(1) 206 A
MC -2. Manager Chair
Herman Miller - Ergon Executive Chair -adjustable back height, with arms, with
casters
Model: ER110FRFHCAHFMT
Key: (1) 138 A (8) 135 A (12) 260 B
(1) 139 A (10) 207 A
(1) 203 A (8) 217 A
(1) 209 A (1) 251 B
(1) 210 A (8) 240 B
(1) 229 A (12) 254 B
2
MC -3. Manager Chair
Herman Miller - Equa Work Chair -high back -split upholstered with adjustable
arms, with casters
Model: EQ130FRMTMTCATWMT
Key: (1) 248 B
CC -1. Conference Chair
Herman Miller - Ergon Executive Chair -adjustable back height with arms, with
casters
Model: ER110FRHFCAI-IFMT
Key: (10) 156 C
VC -1. Visitor Chair
Herman Miller - Ergon Task Chair -adjustable back height, without arms, with
glides
Model: ER305FREEFFGHF
Key: (1) 136 A (1) 139 A (2) 203 A (2) 206 A (3) 214 A
(1) 138 A (1) 148 A (2) 209 A (2) 228 A
(2) 244 B (1) 230 A (1) 211 A (2) 229 A
(2) 251 B (2) 210 A
(4) 260 B
EC -1. Executive Chair
Herman Miller - Hollington Executive Chair -adjustable with lumbar support,
with arms, with casters
Model: HC105FR=
Key: (1) 205 A
(1) 250 B
EC -2. Executive Chair
Kimball - Regent series -high back, full upholstered chair with 5 prong woodbase
and casters
Model: 3410C74B9Cl2
Key: (1) 250 Z
3
EVC -1. Executive Visitor Chair
Herman Miller - Hollington Side Chair -with arms, with glides
Model: HC450FRCT
Key: (2) 205 A
(4) 250 B
EVC -2 Executive Visitor Chair
Kimball - Regent series -mid back, fall upholstered side chair with 5 prong
woodbase and casters
Model: 3425C74B9C12
Key: (4) 250 Z
DRC -l. Drafting Chair
Mayline-Hamilton-Drafting Stool - adjustable stool height -standard grey finish,
with glides
Model: 8201-1
Key: (2) B19
DRC -2. Drafting Chair
Mavline-Hamilton
-Drafting Stool - pneumatic lift, adjustable seat and back
height, black base and frame
Model 5106
Key: (1) B17 D
(1) B16 D
(1) 242 E
(1) 244 E
(1) 273 E
ULC -1. Lounge Chairs
Kimball -Crescent - one seat, lounge chair, fully upholstered
Model: 1722
Key: (2) 141 F
(2) 205 F
4
ULC -2. Lounge Chair
Kimball -Crescent - three seat lounge chair, fall upholstered
Model: 1726
Key: (1) 141 F
(1) 205 F
(1) 260 F
ULC -3. Lounge Chair
La -Z -Boy - night chair, full upholstered
Model: 95301
Key: (2) 250 Y
ULS- 1. Lounge Seat
La -Z -Boy - fullsize sleeper sofa, full upholstered
Model: 9N361
Key: (1) 260 Y
(1) 150 Y
GC -1. Gang Lounge Chair
Kimball-Fahps Series - four seat ganged lounge chair with (2) end tables. I pair
ganging brackets for each pair of seats
Model: 8149K/8103K/8102K/8102K/8104K/8149K/ABL
Key: (2) 149-
(1)201
To be ganged back to back
:
GC -2. Gang Lounge Chair
Kimball-Faho,us Series Lounge Chairs - 2 seat lounge, table 2 seat lounge
configuration
Model: 81-OK/8715/ABL-8149K/ABL-8 IOK/8715/ABL
Key: (1)202
5
GC -3
GC -4.
GC -5.
RC -1.
IC -1.
Gang Lounge Chair
Kimball-Fahgus Series - L-shaped configuration
Model: 81-4K/8715/ABL
Key: (1)227
Gang Lounge Chair
Kimball-Fahgus Series - four seat ganged lounge chair with 2 end tables. I pair
of ganging brackets per pair of sets
Model: 8149K-ABL/8103K/8102K/8102K/8104K-8715-ABL/9149K-ABL
Key: (1)239
Gang Lounge Chair
Kimball-Faghus Series - two seat lounge chair with one end table configuration
Model: 81-OK/8715/ABL-8149K/ABL
Key: (1)252
Recliner Chair
La -Z -Boy - hospitality seating, Reclina-rocker recliner, full upholstered
Model: 9A421
Key: (9) 275 Y
Interview Chair
ModuForm Inc. - molded cushion seat with arms and tubular base. Seat to be
Huckleberry #403 finish, arms and base to be black (blk)
Model: 30-C-971/GR7/3000-1088
Key: (2) 126 (2)123
(2) 128 (2)124
(2) 127
6
C-1. TV/VCR Cart
Winsted - Wood gain plastic laminate finish TV/VCR cart with casters
Model: R3740
Key: (1) B05 G (1) 240 X
(1) 229 G (1) 250 X
P-1. Podium
A-1 Visual Systems - two part speaker's stand, medium oak finish
Model: SS2
Key: (1) B05
(1)235
VCC-l. Vinyl Covered Cork Board
A-1 Visual Systems - vinyl trimmed radius boards, vinyl covered cork surface,
gray trim. To be mounted 4'- 0" A.F.F.
Model: R7236-BWO3
Key: (3) B05 (1)214
(1) B09 (1)217
(1) B14 (1) 215
(1)103 (1)269
(2)126 (1)271
(1)135
(1)149
VCC-2. Vinyl Covered Corkboard
A-1 Visual Systems -. Vinyl trimmed radius boards, vinyl covered cork surface,
gray trim. To be mounted 4'- Y'A.F.F.
Model: R4836-BWO3
Key: (1) B06 (1) 136
(1) B23 (1) 138
(1) B25 (1)139
(1) B17 (1)274
(2) B16 (1)253
(1) 103
(1)128
(3) 137
7
F11
DEB -1. Dry Erase Board
A-1 Visual Systems - vinyl trimmed radius board, white steel surface, gray trim,
with magnetic chalk tray. To be mounted 4'- 0" A.F.F.
Model: R7236
Key: (1) B05 (1)172
(1) 103 (1) 173
(1) 135 (1)217
(1) 137 (1)235
DEB -2. Dry Erase Board
A-1 Visual Systems - vinyl trim radius board, white steel surface, gray trim, with
magnetic chalk tray. To be mounted 4'- 0" A.F.F.
Model: R4836
Key: (1) B06
(1) B16
(1) B17
(1)274
DEB -3. Dry Erase Board
A-1 Visual Systems - vinyl trim radius board, white steel surface, gray trim, with
magnetic chalk tray. To be mounted 4'- 0" A.F.F.
Model: R3624
Key: (2)172
DEB -4. Dry Erase Board
A-1 Visual Systems - executive conference unit, white steel surface, inside doors
to be natural textured cork. To be mounted 3'- 6" A.F.F.
Model: REEW7248-Oak
Key: (1) 156
17-
8
A
aDEB -5. Dry Erase Board
A -I Visual Systems - Executive conference unit, white steel surface, inside doors
to be natural textured cork. To be mounted 3'- 6" A.F.F.
Model: RCECU4848-Oak
Key: (1)207
DEB -6. Dry Erase Board
A-1 Visual Systems - executive conference unit, white steel surface, inside doors
to be natural textured cork- To be mounted 3'- 6" A.F.F.
Model: RCECU6048-Cherry
Key: (1)254
DC -1. Display Case
A-1 Visual Systems - sliding glass door trophy case, surface mounted, medium
oak finish frame, backing surface to be #85 gray finish. To be mounted 3'- 6"
A.F.F.
Model: SGD6048
Key: (1)203
DC -2. Display Case
A-1 Visual System - sliding glass door wood frame board, surface mounted,
Cherry finish frame, backing surface to be #85 gray finish. To be mounted 3'- 6"
A.F.F.
Model: OSD6048
Key: (1)276
TT -1. Training Table
Howe - folding tables with 5/8" black vinyl edge and black enamel leg finish with
#1816 fog dust plastic laminate top
Model: 12ADM
Key: (8) B05
9
TT -2. Training Table
Howe - folding tables with 5/8" black vinyl edge and black enamel leg finish with
#1816 fog dust plastic laminate top
Model: 12ADR
Key: (10) 157
TT -3. Training Table
Howe - folding tables with 5/8" black vinyl edge and black enamel leg finish with
#1816 fog dust plastic laminate top
Model: 12ADK
Key: (4)235
CT_ 1. Conference Table
Howe - mobile folding conference table with .2 1/4" hardwood banding in #2091
light oak. Table tope to be #346 natural oak plastic laminate finish. Base finish
to be Folkstone
Model: HAAIW
Key: (1) 156
CT -2. Conference Table
Howe - Fugue series -rectangular top with two support legs
Model: PBAGR-with 2/28 base
Key: (1) 135 J
(1) 207 J
(1) 217 J
CF -3. Conference Table
Howe - Fugue series -rectangular top with two support legs
Model: PBAGM-with 2/28 base
Key: (1) 240 K
10
L�
L
CT -4. Conference Table
Howe - Fugue series -rectangular top with 1.5 pair support legs
Model: PCAHU-with 2/36 base
Key: (1) 254 K
CT -5. Conference Table
Howe - Fugue series -rectangular top with 1.5 pair support legs
Model: PFGAIW-with 2/36 base
Key: (1) 260 K
DT -1. Drafting Table
Mayline - steel four -post "C" combination drafting table with finish #212 gray
Model: 7736-C
Key: �1�244
ET -1. End Table
National - Radius series -occasional tables
Model: 28-2030TPMO
Key: (1) 141 H (3)2751
(2) 205 H
IT -1. Interview Table
Howe - interview type table -Tempest series stationary table with 1 1/4" vinyl
edge midnight finish. Top finish to be #1816 fog dust and base to have midnight
finish. Tables also to have Tempest floor mount brackets (4 per table). Bracket
to mount to floor through hole and vertical portion to pressure fit on to the end
ofthe leg.
Model: 3CAEI-24T
Key: (1) I -n (1) 130 -no brackets (1) 225 -no brackets
(1) 124 (1) 131 -no brackets (1) 232 -no brackets
(1) 125 -no brackets (1) 132 -no brackets
(1) 127 (1) 140 -no brackets
(1) 126
LT -1. Lunch Table
Howe - circular table with 1 1/4" vinyl edge midnight finish. Top finish to be
#1816 fog dust and base to have midnight finish
Model: PHRCA with base no. 4/28
Key: (2) B11
(3)238
LT -2. Lunch Table
Howe - circular table
Model: PHRCA with base no. 4/28
Key: (1) 260 K
(1) 250 K
MT -1. Magazine Table
National - radius collection occasional table, 20"D x 30"W x 19"H
Model: '28-2030TPMO
Key: (1) 205 H
MT -2. Magazine Table
National - Esquire series occasional table
Model: 33-2030TW
Key: (1)2501
WT -1. Work Table
Howe - rectangular work table with a 2 leg base
Model: PBAEK-with 2/28 base
Key: (1) 210 J
WT -2. Work Table
Howe - rectangular work table with a 2 leg base
Model: PBAGM-with 2/28 base
Key: - (1) 248 K
12
WT -3. Work Table
Howe - rectangular work table with a 2 leg base
Model: PCAHR-with 2/36 base
Key: (1) 258 K
WT -4. Work Table
Howe - Fugue series work table with 2 leg base
Model: PAAD1/2/22
Key: (1) 253 K (1) 149 J
WT -5. Work Table
Howe - Fugue series work table with 2 leg base
Model: PAADM/2/22
Key: (1) 253 K
WT -6. Work Table
Kewaunee - metal base cabinet/pencil drawer/base cabinet and base cabinet at
end of return combination with wood "12' shaped counter top gay baked enamel
finish on metal and oak finish on wood counter top. Counter top overall 212"D x
96"L x 22"D x 26"L
Model: SD-1842/SA-1102/SC-1034/SD-1262
Key: (1) B17
WT -7. Work Table
Kewaunee - kneespace with pencil drawer, metal base cabinet, kneespace with
pencil drawer combination unit. 31"D x T- O"L counter top to be oak finish
wood and gay baked enamel finish on metal base cabinet
Model: SA-1102/SD-1842/SA-1102
Key: (1) B16
13
HF -1. Hanging File Rack
Mayline - vertical file rolling stand with finish #203 sand beige
Model- 9323
Key:. (1)242
T -VM -1. Television Wall Mount Bracket
Winsted - single arm wall mounted television bracket with 1200 swivel and 100
tilt, black finish
Model: 11243 with VCR mounting enclosure model no. 11230
Key: (1) B26
(1)251 (1)276
(1) 135
(1)205 (1)244
(1)137
(1)248 (1)260
(1) 161
(1)203
(1)254
(1)238
(1)258
(1)275
WB -I. Workbench
Edsal - maple top workbench, black metal finish
Model: 5307-34"Hx72"WO0"D
Key:. (1) B19
(1) 163
(1) 168
WB -2. Workbench
Edsal - metal top workbench, black metal finish
Model: 5307-34"Hx72"WO0"D
Key: (1) B16
(1) 164
MB -1. Mailbox Unit
Case Systems - wall mounted mailbox units, total of 64 openings (two units), to
be mounted 2'-0" A.F.F., finish to match Wilsonart Natural Almond #D30-6.
Model• W170.0 36 14 48
Key: (2) B05
14
MB -2. Mailbox Unit
Case Svstems - wall mounted mailbox units, total of 48 openings, (two units) to
be mounted 2'- 6" A.F.F., finish to match Wilsonart Natural Almond #D30-6.
Model: W 170.0 30 14 48
Key: (2) B05
A MB -3. Mailbox Unit
Case Systems - wall mounted mailbox unit, total of 10 openings, to be mounted
3'- 6" A.F.F., finish to match Wilsonart Natural Almond #D30-6.
L;A
Model: W170.0 24 14 24 24"H x 24"W
Key: (1)137
M13-4. Mailbox Unit
Lj
Case Systems - wall mounted mailbox unit, total of 16 cubicles (two units), to be
mounted 4'- 0" A.F.F., finish to match Wilsonart Natural Almond #D30-6.
Model: W130.0 24 13 30
Key: (2)147
STC -1. Storage Cabinet
Case Svstems - cubicle storage unit, total of 24OP enings (two units), finish to
match Wilsonart Natural Almond #D30-6.
Model: B120.0 36 13 30
Key: (2) B21
STC -2. Storage Cabinet
Case Systems - wall storage cabinet, to be mounted 5'- 0" A.F.F., finish to match
Wilsonart Natural Almond #D30-6.
Model: W084.0 24 13 48
Key: (1) 142
(1)204
15
STC -1 Storage Cabinet
Case Systems - wall mounted storage cabinets, to be mounted 5'- 2" A.F.F., finish
to match Wilsonart Natural Almond #D30-6.
Model: W010.0 24 13 48
Key: (6)215
STC -4. Storage Cabinet
Edsal - metal storage cabinet, with 2 extra shelves in Room #134,36"W x 72"H x
18"D with standard locking
Model: 7000
Key: (1) 134 Q (1) 160 R -without back panel
(2) 157 R (1) 217 Q (2) 274 R
(1) 273 R (1) B17 Q
STC -5. Storage Cabinet
Edsal - extra wide storage cabinet. 48"W x 24"D x 78"H with standard locking
Model: 4000
Key: (1) 168 R
(9) 256 R
STC -6. Storage Cabinet
Edsal - counter high storage cabinet, 36"W x 18"D x 42"H with standard locking
Model: 7001
Key: (3) 168 R
PC -I. Push Cart
Winstead - 4 wheel multi-purpose cart, standard two-tone gay finish.
Model: 33025
Key: (1) B21
16
ED-1. Executive Desk
National - Esquire Series -executive right "U" -unit desk. Pedestals to be
box/box/file, hutch on credenza with task light
Model: 33-72102RW/2421CD/33-1569H
Key: (1)2501
D-1. Desk
National - Radius Series -double pedestal desk with center pencil drawer
standard right pedestal locking
Model: 28-3060DPMO/2421 CRMO
Key: (1) 136 H (1) 228 H
(1) 138 H
(1) 139 H
D-2. Desk
National - Esquire series -double pedestal desk. To have bob-box-file/box-box-
file and center pencil drawer. Standard right pedestal locking.
Model: 32-3060DP/2421CD
Key: (1) 128 L
(1) 149 L - no pencil drawer
(3) 161 M
(1) 260 M - with 32-1569H hutch and tasklight and keyboard
tray (no pencil drawer)
D-3. Desk
National - Esquire series -single pedestal desk. To have box -box -file pedestal.
Standard locking pedestal.
Model: 32-3066RP
Key: (1) 149 L
D-4• Desk
National - Esquire series -double pedestal desk. To have box-box-file/file-file
pedestals and center pencil drawer. Standard right locking pedestal.
Model: 32-3060DP ' 0421CD
Key: (1) 149 L
17
D-5.
Desk
National - Radius collection executive double pedestal desk, with center drawer
Model: 28-3672DPMO/2421CDMO
Key: (1) 205 H
(1) 229 H
D-6.
Desk
National - Esquire series executive double pedestal desk with box/box/file
pedestals and center drawer
Model: 33-3672DP/2421CD
Key: (1)2421
(1)2581
DR -1.
Desk with Return
National - Esquire series -secretarial left "L" unit desk to have center pencil
drawer and box -box -file cabinet. Return to have no tray/file-file cabinet.
Standard locking in pedestal.
Model: 32-6675LP/2421CD
Key: (2) 149 L
(1) 211 L -to have tray/file-pedestal on return
DR -2.
Desk with Return
National - Esquire series secretarial right "U unit, pedestals to be box/box/file
with center drawer
Model: 33-6675RP/2421CD
Key: (1)2391
DR -3.
Desk With Return
"U
National - Esquire series secretarial left unit, pedestals to be box/box/file
with center drawer. Desk to be 36"D x 72"W.
Model: 33-6675LP/2421CD
Key: (1)2441
(1)2481
(1)2511
I
I DR -4. Desk with Return
National - Esquire series -secretarial right "L" unit, desk to have center pencil.
drawer and box/box/file pedestal. Standard locking in pedestal
Model: 32-6675R.P/2421CD
Key: (1) 206 L
DR -5. Desk with Return
National - Radius series -executive right "L" unit desk to have center pencil
drawer and box/box/file, return to have no pedestal. Standard locking in
pedestal
Model: 28-7286RPMO/2421CDMO
Key: (1) 203 H
(1) 209 H
DR -6. Desk with Return
National - Radius series -secretarial right "L" unit desk to have center pencil
drawer, both pedestals to be box/box/file. Standard locking in pedestal
mm
A Model: 28-6675RPMO/2421CDMO
Key: (1) 214 H
Um
AR DR -7. Desk with Return
National - Radius series -secretarial left "L" unit, desk to have center pencil
drawer, pedestals to be box/box/file. Standard locking in pedestal
14 Model: 28-6675LPMO/2421CDMO
Key: (1) 214 H
(1) 210 H
CR- L Credenza
National - Radius series -credenza with lock kit.
Model: 28-1866SPMO/LK1
Key: (1) 136 H (1) 138 H (1) 139 H (1) 228 H (1) 229 H
(3) 207 H - center credenza to have closed hutch
Model: 28-15660SMO/48-TL
19
CR -2.
Credenza
National - Esquire series kneespace credenza with keyboard tray and hutch with
task light and lock kit
Model: 33-2172XP/33-1569H/48-TL-LKI- Keyboard Tray
Key: (1)2581 (1)2511 Model: A6541LT
(1)2481 Key: (1)2481
(1)2441
CR -3.
Credenza
National -credenza
- Esquire series storage with lock kit
Model: 33-2172SP/LKI
Key: (1)242-1
(1)2391
(1)2541
CR -4.
Credenza
National - Esquire series storage credenza with lock kit and, hutch with tasklight
Model: 32-2172SP/LKI WT - 32 -1569H/48 -TL WT
Key: (1)249
(1)243
CR -5.
Credenza
National - Radius series-kneespace credenza, both pedestals to be box/box/fie
with closed hutch, standard locking pedestal
Model: 28-1866X?MO/LKI-28-15660SMO
Key: (1) 203 H
(1) 205 H
(1) 209 H
(1) 210 H -with no hutch
CR -6.
Credenza
National
- Radius series-kneespace credenza, box/box/file pedestals, standard
locking pedestal.
Model:. 28-1866XPMO
Key: (1) 206 H -no left pedestal
(1) 211 H -no right pedestal
20
BC -1. Bookcase
National - 3200 series -4 shelf (3 adjustable) bookcase
Model: 32-3372BCO
Key: (1) 214 N
(4) 217 N
(1) 235 N
(3) 260 N
Id BC -2. Bookcase
National - Radius series -4 shelf (3 adjustable) veneer fi-nish bookcase
Id Model: 28-3672BCOMO
Key: (1) 203 H
d (1) 205 H
BC -3. Bookcase
IdNational - 3300 series -4 shelf (3 adjustable) bookcase
Model: 33-3372BCO
Key: (2)2421 (1)2541 (1)2501 (1)2511
BC -4. Bookcase
National - laminate bookcase -5 shelves (4 adjustable)
Model: M08436
lid Key- (2) 137 N
BC -,5. Bookcase
National - Esquire series -2 shelf (1 adjustable) bookcase
Model: 33-3336BC0
Key: (2)2501
(2)2481
A
21
MSS -1. Movable Shelving System
Elecompack - Mechanical assist movable shelving system' 2100 series, system
M
size: 96'W x 144"D x 98"H with sliding reference shelves-Itr, overhead anti -tip
and system lock. End panel finish to be #204 charcoal.
Key: (1) 154
VFC- 1. Vertical File Cabinet
National - metal 4 drawer vertical file cabinet with factory installed plunger lock
Model: N2604L
Key: (7)1370 (4) 149 0 (1) 229 0
(2)1360 (3) 161 P (1) 227 0
(2)1380 (1) 217 0 (3) 244 P
(2)1390 (1) 228 0 (1) 212 0
VFC-2. Vertical File Cabinet
National - metal 2 drawer vertical file cabinet with factory installed plunger lock
Model: N2602L
Key: (2)1490
(2) 227 P
VFC-3. Vertical File Cabinet
National - metal 3 drawer legal vertical file cabinet with factory installed plunger
lock
Model: N2693L
Key: (2) 160 P
(3) 258 P
LC -1. Lateral File Cabinet
National - laminate 4 drawer lateral file cabinet with standard central lock
Model: C4MOFR
Key: (1) 205 H (1) 209 H (1) 229 H
(2) 203 H (1) 228 H
22
j
D
LC -2. Lateral File Cabinet
National - metal 5 drawer lateral file cabinet with standard locking
Model: 3660 U
Key: (2)2060
(2)2110
(2)2020
LC -3. Lateral File Cabinet
National - metal 4 drawer lateral file cabinet with standard locking
Model: 3648LO
Key: (1) 227 P
(3) 256 P
LC -4. Lateral File Cabinet
National - metal 2 drawer lateral Ede with standard locking
Model: 3624LO
Key: (1) 239 P
(1) 251 P
LC -5. Lateral File Cabinet
National - Esquire series -2 drawer lateral file with standard locking
Model: 33-2136FRP
Key: (2)2501
(2)2481
Sealy - twin size mattress and box spring with frame. Mattresses to be "posrure-
pedic" type
Key: (8)262
23
Li Li
BD -2.
Water Bed
Land and Sky - waveless super single size bladder, 48"W x 84"L wood frame,
heating element, liner
Model: 550
Key: (1)262
TS -i.
Typing Stand
Bush - typing table with collapsible drop-leaf, modesty panel, dual wheel hooded
casters. 26 3/4"W x 15 3/8"D x 26 1/2"H with oak finish
Key: (1) 130 (1)140 (1)228
(1) 131 (1) 149 (8)1_30
(1)137 (1)209 (1)227
CNT-l.
Counter Top
Paxton -Patterson - one (1) single door cabinet, one (1) single door cabinet and
0
one (1) single door cabinet combination unit with 4'- 0"L x 24"D x I 3/4"H hard
maple counter top (top B). Standard natural maple finish. Overhang to be
divided at ends.
Model: 63-1314/63-1314/63-1314/63-2898
Key: (7)262
CNT-2.
Counter Top
Paxton -Patterson - one (1) 2 drawer base cabinet, 2'- 0" knee space, one (1) 2
drawer base cabinet combination unit with 5'- 0"L x 24"D x 1 3/4"H hard maple
counter top (top B). Standard natural maple finish.
JE
Model: 5002(18F)/5002(18F)-1311
Key: , (9)262,
PB -1.
Pegboard Wall Unit
Paxton/Patterson - wall toot cabinet with 1/8" pegboard inserts 48"W x 8"D x
48"H when closed. Mounted above workbench.
Model: 63-1842
Key: (1) B19
24
FC -1. Card File Cabinet
Tennsco - 30 drawer cabinet, stack 2 high, black finish
Model: 3075
Key: (2) B15
OH -1. Overhead Storage
National - Officescape-overhead storage cabinet with doors and tackboard
Model: DDM060 with 2060TB6225
Key: (1) 206 H
(1) 211 H
PCT -1. Computer Table
Howe - Tempest stationary table with adjustable/retractable keyboard tray and
locking casters
Model: 3CAE1/Z4T/PKJEH
Key: (1) 209 J
Partitions and modular work stations - Herman Miller
Police Department finishes - S, T, V
Id Room #134:
(4) A1120.4730ELTLT-powered
(2) Al. 120.47' )OCLTLT-non-powered
Id (1) A0729LT-wall start
(1) A1230.47HLTLT-3 way connector
(1) A1240.47HLTLT-4 way connector
(3) A0620 -draw rod
(4) A1250.47HLTLT-finished end
(4) G5010.LT-pencil drawer
(4) A2310,3060LHTLT-work surface
(1) A131I.ALT-receptacle
(1) A131I.BLT-receptacle
(4) G5120.19KLT-stationary pedestal
(4) G5130.19KLT-stationary pedetal
Room #137:
(8) Al 120.3930ELTLT-powered
Id (4) Al 120.3930CLTLT-non-powered
(2) AIJ20.3924ELTLT-powered
id IS
D
(4) A1230.HLTLT-3-way connector
(4) A0806 -draw rod
(6) A1250.39HLTLT-endcap
(8) G5010.LT-pencil drawer
(8) A2310.3060LHTLT-worksur-face
(4) NP364301-T-support panel
(1) A131 LALT-receptacle
(1) A1311.BLT-receptacle
(8) G5120.19KLT-stationary pedestal
(7) G5130.19KLT-stationary pedestal
Room #137:
(7) A01315FFLT-wall strip
(3) A3351.1342KLT-flipper door unit
(2) A3351.1336KLT-flipper door unit
(1) A3410A642LT-tackboard
(2) G6110.36LT-tasklight
(2) G6110.42LT-tasklight
(1) A2310.3072LHTLT-worksurface
(1) A2310.3084LITrLT-worksurface
(1)A2322.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(1) G5010,LT-pencil drawer
(1) 7715.LT-keyboard tray
(1) G5120.19K.LT-stationary pedestal
(1) G5130.191<,LT-stationary pedestal
Room #227:
(2) A1120.4748CLTLT-non-powered
(1) A I 120.4724CLTLT-non-powered
(2) A0620 -draw rod
(1) A1220.47HLTLT-2 way connector
(1) A0729LT-wall
start
Room #230:
Al. 120.4724CLTLT-non-powered
(11)
(10) A1120.4748CLTLT-non-powered
(20) Al 120.4730ELTLT-powered
(9) A1120.4736CLTLT- non-powe red
(32) A0620 -draw rod
(11) A1220.47HLTLT-2-way connector
(3) A1230.47HLTLT-3-way connector
(11) A 1250.47HLiLT-end cap
(6) A0729LT-wall start
(10) A2310.3072HLTLT-worksurface
(10) NP364.301-T-support panel
26
Room #243:
(1) NP253.6718NRKLTLT-non-powered
(1) NP253.6742ERKLTLT- powered
(1) NP263.67RKLTLT-end cap
(1) NP265-panel insert
(2) A0211 -draw rod
'17
LI
(10) G5010.LT-pencil drawer
(4) A131I.ALT-receptacle
(4) A131I.BLT-receptacle
(10) A3210.1330LT-shelf
(10) A3610.301-T-tool bar
(10) G7110.10LT-paper tray
(10) G7130.LT-diagonai tray
(10) G5120.19KLT-stationary pedestal
(20) G5130.19KLT-stationary pedestal
Fire Department Finishes - S, T, W
Room #241:
(4) A1130.6718NRKLTLT-non-powered
(8) A1130.6730ERKLTLT-powered
(4) A1130.6742ERKLTLT-powered
(8) A1130.6742NRKLTLT-non-powered
(5) A1220.67F=-2-way connector
(4) A1250,67RKLT-end cap
(1) NP265-insert (pkg. of 25)
(2) A1130.6736ERKLTLT-powered
(1) A1130.6724ERKLTLT-powered
(22) A0211-draw rod
(4) A0665LT-wall start
(8) NP364.30LT-support panel
(4) A2310.3060LHTLT-worksurface
(4).AM10.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(4) A2310.3018LHTLT-worksurface
(4) A2332.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(4) G5010.LT-pencil drawer
(4) A3351.1342KLT-flipper door unit
(8) A3351.1330KLT-flipper door unit
(4) A3410.1642LT-tackboard
(4) G6110.42LT-tasklight
(8) G6110.30LT-task-light
(1) A13 1 LALT-receptacle (pkg. of 6)
(1) A131 LBLT-receptacle (pkg. of 6)
(4) G5 12 0. 19KLT-stationary pedestal
(8) G5130.19KLT-stationary pedestal
Room #243:
(1) NP253.6718NRKLTLT-non-powered
(1) NP253.6742ERKLTLT- powered
(1) NP263.67RKLTLT-end cap
(1) NP265-panel insert
(2) A0211 -draw rod
'17
LI
0
(1) A0665LT-wall start
(1) A2310.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(1) A2310.3018LHTLT-worksurface
(1) A2332.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(1) A2310.3072LHTLT-worksurface/top to be 28" A.F.F.
(1) G5010.1 -T -pencil drawer
(3) A3350.1336RKLT-flipper door unit
(3) A3410.1636LT-tackboard
(3) G6110.36LT-tasklight
(4) A01315HFLT-wall strip
(2) G5120.19RKLT-stationary pedestal
(1) G5130.19RYJ-T-stationaTy pedestal
(1) G5912 -LT -utility tray
(1) G5911.19LT-stationary divider
(2) G7110.10MT-paper tray
(2) G7120.8W-vertical tray
(2) G7130MT-diagonal tray
(1 pkg.) G7149BU-hanger pegs
(1) G150.3AMT-arch
(1) G7211.04BU-bin
(1) G7210NIT-organizer tray
(I pkg.) G7411MT-message holder
(1) G7412MT-calender holder
(1) G7414MT-tape dispenser
(1) G7415MT-pad pencil holder
(3) A3610.36LT-tool bar
(1) G7510NIT-armature
(1) G7630.09MT-telephone tray
(1) A0541LT-keyboard tray
(1) G731.24MT-mini-shelf
(2) G7320.05MT-rail divider
Room #249:
(2) A1120.3942ERKLTLT-powered
(1) A1250.39HRKLTLT-end cap
(2) A0806 -draw rod
(1) A08081 -T -wall start
(1) NP364.330LT-support panel
(2) A2310.3072LHTLT-worksurface/one (1) top to be mounted 28" A.F.F.
(1) A2310.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(1) A2332.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(1) G5010.I.T-pencil drawer
(3) A3350.1648RKLTLT-Hopper door unit
(3) A3410.1648LT-tackboard
(3) G6110.48LT-taskli-ht
28
(4) A01315FFLT-wall strip
(2) G5120, 19RKLT-stationary pedestal
(2) G5130.19RKLT-stationary pedestal
(2) G7110.10MT-paper tray
(2) G7130MT-diagonal tray
(I pkg.) G7149BU-hanger pegs
(1) G150.3AMT-arch
(1) G7413MT-card file
(1) G7414MT-tape dispenser
(1) G76 IOMT-document stand
(2) G712.8MT-Ver-tical tray
(1) G7210MT-organizer tray
(1) G7211.04BU-bin
(1 pkg.) G741IMT-message holder
(1) 7412MT-calender holder
(2) G7510NIT-armature
(1) G7630.09Nff-telephone tray
(3) A3610.48NIT-tool bar
(1) A3610.42MT-tool bar
(1) A0541LT-keyboard tray
(1 pkg.) G7330LT-shelf divider
Room #252:
(1) A1130,6742ERKLTLT-powered
(2) A1130.6742NR-KLTLT-non-powered
(1) A1220.67FLTLT-2-way connector
(1) A1250.67RKLILT-end cap
(1) NP265-panel insert (pkg. of 25)
(1) A1130.6736ERKLTLT-powered
(6) A0211 -draw rod
(1) A0665LT-wall start
(2) NP364.301-T-support panel
(1) A2310.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(1) A2332.3042LHTLT-worksurface
(1) G5010.LT-pencil drawer
(1) A3351.1342RKLT-flipper door unit
(1) G6110.42LT-tasklight
(3) NP253.6736NRKLTT-T-non-powered
(4) A3351.1336RKLT-flipper door unit
(4) G6110.36LT-tasklight
(2) A2310.3036LHTLT-worksurface.
(1) A2310.3072LHTLT-worksurface
(2) G5120.19RKLT-stationary pedestal
29
M
(2) G5130.19RYJ-T-stationary pedestal
(4) G71 10. 1OMT-paper tray
(2) G713OMT-diagonal tray
(1 pkg.) G7149BU-hanger pegs
(1) G150.3AMT-arch
(1) G7413N4T-card file
(1) 67414MT-tape dispenser
(1) G76 1OW-document stand
(2) G712.8NIT-vertical tray
(1) G721OMT-organizer tray
(1) G7211.04BU-bin
(1 Pkg.) G741IMr-message holder
(1) G7412Nff-calender holder
(?) G751OMT-armature
(1) G7630.09W-telephone tray
(4) A3610.36LT-tool bar
(1) A3610.42W-tool bar
(1) A0541LT-key board tray
(1 pkg.) G7330LT-shelf divider
Room #252 (Lounge Area):
(4) A1120.3930ERKLTLT-powered
(1) A1120.393ONRYJTLT-non-powered
(1) A1220.39FLTLT-2-way
connection
(1) A1250.39RYJ-T-end cap
(1) A0808LT-wall start
(1) A131I.A.LT-receptacle
(1) A131I.BLT-receptacle
Room #257:
(1) Al 130.6736NRKLTLT-non-powered
(1) A0665LT-wall start
(3) A3351.1348RKLT-flipper door unit
(3) G6110.48LT-tasklight
(1) A2310.3048LHTLT-worksurface
(1) A2310.3096LHTLT-worksurface
(4) A01315FFLT-wall strip
(1) G5010.1 -T -pencil drawer
(1) G5120.19RKLT-stationary pedestal
(2) G5130.19RKLT-stationary pedestal
12
30
Room #262: Finish V this room
(15) A1120.8530CLTLT-non-powered
(2) A1120.8536CLTLT-non-powered
(21) A1120.8536ELTLT-powered
(1) Al. 120.8548C= -non -powered
(24) A0212 -draw rod
(1) A1220.85HLTLT-2-way connector
(7) A1230.85BLTLT-3-way connector
(17) A1250.85HLTLT-end cap
(10) A066LT-wall start
(24) A3210.1336LT-shelf
(2) A3210.133OLT-shelf
(9) G6110.36LT-tasklight
CPY-I Copyboard
Quartet - wall mounted copyboard with "Memory Recall" to be mounted Y- 6"
A.F.F.
Model: T5-QO-3000
Key: (1)254
MLR -1 Mobile Literature Rack
Smith System - mobile double face display stand with 6 shelves, sand finish
Model: 21882
Key: (1)260
VDC-I Video Cassette Cabinet
Lee Metal Products - 5 drawer video cassette cabinet with 2 doors and lock, sand
finish
Model: 797-5619
Key:
(1)260
VDC-2 Video Cassette Cabinet
Bevis - 23" x 16" x 32'H mobile video cassette cabinet with -ray finish
1-1
Model: V0806
Key: (1)260
31
MRF -1 Mailroom Furniture
Hamilton Sorter - console with locking undertable cabinet, closed 6",,*,O
and sort module with 40 openings. Components as follows: _ rm
Console:
MC603036
Lock:
Lock -B
Closed Platform:
TR601206
Sort Module:
H575-30
Shelves (10):
RD10
Key:
174 X
VCL-1 Vertical Console
Amco-vertical electric console with louvered rear door, top louvered
console front, finish to be #116 -black
Model: 6242
Key: (1)103
T/,Ml/,MN9
32
II
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= JTv tu
TO; Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: September 10, 1992
SUBJ: Bid Results for Stump Cutter
Sealed bids were opened on September 9, 1992, for the purchase
of a stump cutter. Four bid packages were mailed out and two
bids were received. Bid results were as follows:
Vermeer -Illinois
Base Bid $21,000.00
Trade In Allowance 6,000.00
$15,000.00
Deduction of
custom paint not
required 500.00
$14,500.00
Ravco Manufacturina
$19,841.00
6,730.00
$13,111.00
$13,111.00
Note that in the above, we can deduct $500.00 from the Vermeer
bid because their standard paint color is very close to the
color of our other Public Works equipment.
Although the cost difference of the Vermeer machine is $1,389.00
more than the Rayco, it is the only machine which meets our
specifications. The low bid, as submitted by Rayco, did not
meet our specifications on the following items:
Type of cutter teeth - We specified Pro -teeth, a newer type of
tooth we began using one year ago on our present stump cutter.
We have found that this tooth is stronger and much easier to
replace than older types of teeth. The Rayco unit cannot use
the Pro -teeth.
Alternator - We specified Delco because we keep these in stock,
and they are less costly than other brands. Rayco specified a
different alternator.
Remote control and associated valves - We specified a remote
control to enable the operator to stand in a different position
to avoid flying debris such as rocks, etc. The Rayco unit does
not include a remote control. (Prior to bidding we understood.
that the remote control feature would add approximately $1,500
to the unit costs).
Frame thickness - We specified a 3/811 minimum frame; the Rayco
frame is only 5/16".
For the above reasons, I recommend the purchase of one 1992
Vermeer 665B Stump Cutter with trade-in, in an amount not to
exceed $14,500.00. This unit meets orexceedsall our specifica-
tions. There is $26,500.00 allocated in Accoun t #48-077-93-8457
for this purpose on page 187 of the 1992-93 budget.
1"w 01 W ji-KO
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
STMPRESL.TS/FILES/BIDS