HomeMy WebLinkAbout4461_001VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4441
Next Resolution No. 19-92
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center June 16, 1992
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald 11Skip" Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Eoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Floros
IV. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, June 2, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE R'EARD
A. PRESENTATION: Heroic Service Awards
VII. MAYORIS REPORT
A. Reconsider Ordinance No. 4438 entitled "An
Ordinance Amending Article XIV Entitled "Sign
Review Board" of Chapter 5 of the Village Code.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN OPTION AGREEMENT WITH
CATHOLIC CHARITIES FOR CERTAIN REAL ESTATE
NECESSARY FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SECTION 202
SENIOR HOUSING
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT WITH
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE
I$. NEW BUSINESS
A. Sign Review Board Case No. 26-92
Petitioner, Charlie Club, is requesting
an amendment to the Sign Ordinance to
to create a Special Use category which
would permit off -premise signs. The Sign
Review Board recommended this request be
denied by a vote of 4-1.
ALL
(Exhibit A)
(Exhibit B)
C. ZBA 28 -SU -92, 1500 South Elmhurst Road
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use
to allow the installation of a roof -
mounted satellite antenna for the Regional
Office of Payless. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended approving this request
by a vote of 6-0.
D. ZBA 31-V-92, 202 South See Gwun
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a zero side yard setback, rather than
the 7.5 feet required, in order to construct
a concrete patio. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended denial of this request by a
vote of 2-4.
E. ZBA 32-V-92, 1000 East Central Road
The Petitioner, T. J. Maxx, is requesting a
Special Use to allow construction of a wall
mounted satellite dish 10 feet in radius.
By a vote of 5-1, the Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting approval for a roof -
mounted satellite antenna.
F. ZBA 34-V-92, 302 South Lancaster
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a driveway width of 19 feet, rather
than the permitted 15 feet. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended approving this
request by a vote of 6-0.
G. ZBA 35 -SU -92, Randhurst Shopping Center
The Petitioner is requesting an amendment
to the Planned Unit Development governing
Randhurst Shopping Center to allow expansion
of a restaurant included in the PUD from
5,000 square feet to 7,000 square feet.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
H. ZBA 26-A-92, Text Amendment
The proposed text amendment would allow
commercial vehicles to park in residential
garages. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by,a
vote of 5-1.
I. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE DETERMINING THE
PREVAILING WAGE FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS
This ordinance, required by State Law, adopts
the State prevailing wage schedule, which
applies to contractors doing business with
the Village. (Exhibit C)
J. Acknowledge receipt of the Mount Prospect
Public Library Annual Report
K. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE
OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit D)
M. A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL
TAX FUNDS
This Resolution appropriates MFT Funds
for the reconstruction of Bittersweet Lane
between Quince and Burning Bush Lane. (Exhibit E)
N. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXTENSION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR ROADWAY MAINTENANCE AS SET FORTH IN
RESOLUTION NO. 23-91. (Exhibit F)
X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Fire Department Uniforms
2. Fire Department Turn Out Gear
3. Fire Department Work out Clothing
4. Water Meters & Registers -
5. Clean catch basins and inlets
6. Repair catch basins and inlets
7. Pavement marking
8. Shared Cost Sidewalk Program
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Personnel
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JUNE 4, 1992
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
INVOCATION
$ 574,747
Refusal Disposal Fund
The invocation was given by Trustee Busse.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Community Development Block Grant Fund 1,518
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks,
APPROVE
moved to approve the
minutes of the regular
MINUTES
meeting of the Mayor
and Board of Trustees
Vehicle Replacement Fund
held May 19, 1992.
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Upon roll call: Ayes:
Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
298
Hoefert, Wilks
389,185
Nays:
None
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Motion carried.
Debt Service Funds
296,515
APPROVAL OF BILLS
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
Trustee Floros, seconded
by Trustee Busse,
APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the
following list of bills:
Benefit Trust Fund
General Fund
$ 574,747
Refusal Disposal Fund
1,972
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
75,247
Community Development Block Grant Fund 1,518
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
11,088
Water & Sewer Fund
129,073
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,321
Risk Management Fund
68,782
Vehicle Replacement Fund
-
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.
204
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
298
Fire & Police Building Const.
389,185
Flood Control Revenue Fund
69,572
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
296,515
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
18,212
Police Pension Fund
43,347
Firemen's Pension Fund
47,349
Benefit Trust Fund
-
$1,728,430
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse,
moved FINANCIAL
to accept the financial report for the
period REPORT
ending April 30, 1992, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 June .4, 1992
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CIT12ENS TO BE HEARD
None.
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Farley presented a Proclamation acknowledging the
FIFTH GRADERS
accomplishment of the fifth grade students and staff
FAIRVIEW SCHOOL
at Fairview Elementary School on their recent simulated
space shuttle project.
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Farley proclaimed Sunday, June 14th as Flag Day
FLAG DAY
in Mount Prospect.
AMEND CH. 13
An ordinance was presented for second reading that
CLASS 11R11
would create one additional Class 11R11 liquor license
for the Chungkiwa. Restaurant to be located at 1631-
1633 South Busse Road.
ORD.NO. 4434
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4434
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 13
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
CLASS #twit
delete one Class 'twit liquor license, issued to Wag's
Restaurant, 1000 South Elmhurst Road. This restaurant
is closing and Shoney's will be taking over this
location.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4435
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4435
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF 14OUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
'Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 17-V-92
ZBA 17-V-92, 1500 - 1522 N. Elmhurst Road
1500-1522 N.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading which
ELMHURST ROAD
would allow a reduction in the number of required
parking spaces for this shopping center, located
at the southwest corner of Elmhurst Road and Camp
Mc Donald Road.
Page 2 June .4, 1992
It was noted that the variation would permit Lou
Malnatils to operate a carry-out/pick-up restaurant.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
ORD.NO. 4436
for passage of Ordinance No. 4436
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
GENERALLY LOCATED AT 1500 - 1522 NORTH ELMHURST ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
DEVELOPMENT
would grant modifications from the Development Code
CODE
(Chapter 16) to allow an escrow to be established
MODIFICATIONS.
guaranteeing the installation of streets, sidewalks,
228 & 230
and street lights at such time as the Village
S. PRAIRIE
determines appropriate. The requirement to install
storm sewers was also waived only for the period of
time the lots are developed, however, it was noted
that future owners of the property may be required
to install storm sewers. The subject property,
Malapanes Subdivision, is located in the middle of
the block in an area which does not have roadway
improvements. The Plan Commission has reviewed
these requests and recommended approval.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
ORD.NO. 4437
for passage of Ordinance No. 4437
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT 228 & 230 SOUTH PRAIRIE AVENUE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Malapanes Plat of Subdivision was presented.
MALAPANES
This subdivision divides one large lot into
PLAT OF
two lots for single family homes.
SUBDIVISION
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest
his signature on the Malapanes Plat of Subdivision,
creating 228 and 230 South Prairie Avenue.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented that would authorize
RESTRICTIVE
execution of a Restrictive Covenant for property
COVENANT
known as 228 and 230 South Prairie Avenue. This
Covenant would guarantee the installation of
storm sewers at a future date.
Page 3 - June 4, 1992
RES.NO. 18-92
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 18-92
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
RESTRICTIVE COVE14ANT FOR MALAPANES SUBDIVISION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Kays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 5
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
SIGN REVIEW
would amend Article XIV entitled "Sign Review Board"
BOARD:
of Chapter 5 of the Village Code by increasing the
MEMBERSHIP
number of members on that Board from 5 to 7.
Members of the Board stated that all Board and
Commission members should be residents of the Village.
It was noted that this has been a policy of the
Village.
ORD.NO. 4438
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4438
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIV ENTITLED
"SIGN REVIEW BOARD" OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 5
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
SAFETY COMM.
would amend Article X entitled "Safety Commission" of
Chapter 5 of the Village code by increasing the number
of members on that Commission from 7 to 9.
ORD.NO. 4439
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4439
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE X ENTITLED
"SAFETY COMMISSION" OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
CLOSE ROADWAYS:
A Resolution was presented requesting permission from
JULY 4TH PARADE
the State of Illinois to close specified roads in order
to conduct the annual July 4th parade.
RES.NO. 19-92
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 19-92
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING THE CLOSURE OF
STATE RIGHT-OF-WAYS IN ORDER TO CONDUCT
THE ANNUAL JULY 4TH PARADE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 -.June 4, 1992
The 1991 Fair Housing Report was presented FAIR
for acceptance. The Plan Commission had reviewed HOUSING
this report and recommended acceptance by the REPORT
Village Board.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Plan
Commission and accept the 1991 Fair Housing Report.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented expressing the support SUPPORT
of the Village for the Catholic Charities application CATHOLIC
for Senior Citizen Housing under the HUD Section 202 CHARITIES
project. The proposed senior citizen housing site SR.HOUSING
would be located at the southeast corner of Pine
Street and Central Road in conjunction with the
downtown redevelopment plan.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
RES.NO. 20-92
for passage of Resolution No. 20-92
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE APPLICATION OF
CATHOLIC CHARITIES SENIOR HOUSING
SECTION 202 PROJECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
OPTION
would authorize execution of an Option Agreement
AGREEMENT:
with Catholic Charities for the purchase of Village
CATHOLIC
owned property for the purpose of constructing
CHARITIES
senior citizen housing.
Members of the Village asked for clarification
of various terms specified in the proposed
Option Agreement.
This ordinance will be presented June 16th for
second reading along with answers to the concerns
expressed by members of the Board.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND
would amend ordinance No. 4321 by extending the
ORD.NO.4321
effective date of Ordinance No. 4321, governing
property known as 1007 Pendleton, for one
additional year.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 5 - June 4, 1992
ORD.NO. 4440 Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
1007 PENDLETON passage of Ordinance No. 4440
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4321 TO
EXTEND THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR ONE ADDITIONAL
YEAR FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1007 PENDLETON
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floras,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ILLINOIS BELL An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
FRANCHISE authorize a new franchise agreement between the Village
AGREEMENT and Illinois Bell Telephone.
The proposed franchise agreement has been negotiated
between the various municipalities and the Northwest
Municipal Conference.
Trustee Wilks asked that the Village Attorney review
this proposed agreement in order to assure that it
protects and benefits the Village of Mount Prospect.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading
at the June 16th meeting of the Village Board.
Page 6 - June 4, 1992
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BID RESULTS:
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
following bid results.
The Fire Department Uniform bid will be presented
June 16th.
AMBULANCE
The following bids were received for the re -chassis of
RE -CHASSIS
a Fire Department ambulance and the conversion of the
existing chassis to a flat bed, all purpose vehicle.
Bidder Conmersig Total
Emerge -A -Star $3,929 $44,872
Taylor :3,000 44,350
It was noted that while Taylor was the low bidder, the
staff recommended accepting the bid submitted by
Emerge -A -Star due to the fact that the facility is
closer geographically and the fact that the Fire
Department has dealt with Emerge -A -Star before and is
satisfied with the quality of work.
EMERGE -A -STAR
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
reject the bids received for the re -chassis of an
ambulance and conversion to a flat bed vehicle and to
authorize entering into a contract with Emerge -A -Star
for the required work at a cost not to exceed
$44,872.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - June 4, 1992
13
The following bids were received for one 8 cubic
DUMP BODY
yard dump body.
Bidder Model Amount
Brake & Equipment Co. Heil HH $4,976.00
Heil -Chicago, Inc. Heil HH 5,275.00
Schuster Equipment Co. Johnson JD201 7,341.00
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
BRAKE &
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
EQUIPMENT Co.
and accept the low qualified bid submitted by
Brake & Equipment Company for one 8 cubic yard dump
body at a cost not to exceed $4,976.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the purchase
2 DUMP BODIES
of two 8 cubic yard dump bodies to be installed on
new truck chassis:
Bidder Model Amount
Rouse Welding & Body Co. Heil HH $12,192
Heil -Chicago, Inc. Heil HH 12,900
Brake & Equipment Co. Heil HH 13,896
Schuster Equipment Co. Johnson 21,752
DAC2-331
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
ROUSE WELDING
to concur with the recommendation of the
& BODY Co.
administration and accept the low qualified'bid
submitted by Rouse Welding & Body Company in the
amount of $12,192.00 for two a cubic yard dump
bodies.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.'
The -following bids were received for the purchase
HOPPER
of one 7-3/4 cubic yard hopper material spreader:
SALT
Bidder Model AmountSPREADER
Schuster Equipment Swenson EV -100-9 $ 9,495
ITEC Flink LKC5A 12,412
It was noted that the bid submitted by Schuster
Equipment did not meet the advertised bid specifications.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
accept the low qualified bid submitted by ITEC in the
amount of $12,412 for one 7-3/4 cubic yard hopper
material spreader.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - June 4, 1992
TREE REMOVAL
The following bids were received for the tree removal
CONTRACT
contract:
Diameter Inch
Bidder Medium Large Very Large
Nels J. Johnson $11.80 $13.80 $16.00
Tree Experts
Christians Tree 10.50 21.90 26.45
Service, Inc.
NELS JOHNSON
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
accept the bid submitted by Nels J. Johnson Tree
Experts for the tree removal contract at a cost not to
exceed $3,000.00
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
TREE TRIMMING
The following bids were received for the tree trimming
CONTRACT
contract, with options with or without wound painting:
Total Total
Bidder W/O Painting With Painting
Nels J. Johnson $76,087.50 $ 76,087.50
Christians Tree Service 81,599.60 113,379.75
NELS JOHNSON
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved. to
accept the low qualified bid submitted by Nels J.
Johnson Tree Experts for the trimming program in an
amount not to exceed $90,000.00
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
BROADACRE
Village Manager Dixon stated that Broadacre will be
present at the next Committee of the Whole meeting to
discussion the downtown redevelopment plan.
PROM NIGHT
Trustee Wilks complimented the Fire Department on the
PROGRAM
Prom Night Program Put on at Prospect High School,
reflecting the dangers involved with drinking and
driving. Special appreciation was expressed to
Firefighter/Paramedic Dale Steward on organizing this
event.
EXECUTIVE
EXECUTIVE SESSION
SESSION
Mayor Farley asked the Board to adjourn into Executive
Session for the purpose of discussing land acquisition
and personnel.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
adjourn into Executive Session.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 8 - June .4, 1992
The Village Board went into Executive Session
at 8:50 P.M.
Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 10:39 P.M. RECONVENE
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Busse
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Floros
Trustee Hoefert
Trustee Wilks
ADJOURNMENT I ADJOURN
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:39 A.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 9 - June 4, 1992
ial
General Fund
Refuse Disposal Fund
Motor Fuel Tax
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
En� terorise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
Parking System Revenue
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
Vehicle Replacement Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
Downtown Redev Const Funds
Police & Fire Building Construction
Flood Control Construction Fund
Debt Service Funds
AMMINIM-MMM
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
June 11, 1992
Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest
Balance 6/01/92 through Per Attached Journal Balance
6101192 61111.122 Dist of Bills Entry 6111/92
$ 3,234,178
$149;562
$ 529,323
25,772
26,149
2,191
686,079
89,464
148,493
28,382
2,796
4,524
75,656
9,752
72,074
3,351,846
161,736
426,122
207,867
4,811
48,017
1,238,436
17,947
73,439
1,052,579
927
34,309
1,283,265
19,915
3,189
549,969
2,386
485
4,590,449
1,259
26,004
4,608,684
9,805
-
1,026,959
3,848
2,931
4,787
4,560
7,693
1,416,936
17,940
14,773
17,461,155
21,278
32
19,335,719
22,481
-
244.945
147
2.167
160.423,663 I-if&.763 11.225a6
$ 2,854,417
49,730
627,050
26,654
13,334
3,087,460
164,661
1,182,944
1,019,197
1,299,991
551,870
4,565,704
4,618,489
1,027,876
1,654
1,420,103
17,482,401
19,358,200
242,92-5
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
AVENUE BANK AND TRUST COMPANY
BEAR CONSTRUCTION
BLUE JAY CORP.
KEVIN BOLGER
BOSTON COFFEE & TEA
GEORGE L. BUSSE & COMPANY
SAIBY K. CHACKO
CITIBANK, N.A.
LORI CLAUSON
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
JOHN DEMONTE
CAROL DEREN
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
DISBURSEMENT ACCT
DOERING LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS
DOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
PATRICK DUNN
EVERSON ROSS COMPANY
FIRETAC SYSTEMS
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
RA3NES & COMPANY
WESLEY HESFORD
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REPLACE PHASE SELECTOR
$2,925.00
$2,925.00
RECONSTRUCTION
$35,944.65
$35,944.65
WAGE DUDUCTION
$943.85
$943.85*
C10230 BEAR CONST
$475.00
C10427 BEAR CONST
$100.00
$575.00
900928 BLUE JAY BLDRS
$550.00
$550.00
C10758 BOLGER KEVIN
$100.00
$100.00
C10547 BOSTON TEA
$75.00
$75.00
911126 GEORGE L BUSSE
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
REFUND OVERPMT STICKER
$10.00
$10.00
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB
$265.00
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS '
$5,900.00
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS GAB
$9,936.87
$16,101.87*
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.38
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.24
$2.62
PMT P/R 6/11/92
$224.25
$224.25
SERVICCE
$9,248.15
SERVICE
$6,104.48
$15,352.63
C10603 DEMONTE
$75.00
$75.00
010453 DEREN
$100.00
$100.00
SHARP TONER KIT
$405.00
$405.00*
P/R ENDING 6/11/92
$1300.24
P/R ENDING 6/11/92
$40,142.06
P/R ENDING 6/11/92
$408,777.66
P/R ENDING 6/11/92
$1,691.94
P�R ENDING 6/11/92
$748.20
$452,660.10*
9 0211AD0ERING LANDSCAPE
$2,811.50
$2,811.50
SERVICE DOORS
$1,140.00
$1,140.00
REFUND HEARING FEE
$100.00
$100.00
SUPPLIES
$535.75
$535.75
TAGS -SOBA UNITS
$231.00
$231.00
MAY 92 MED BENEFIT REIMB
$6,275.84
MAY 92 DEP CARE REIMB
$1,417.00
$7,692.84*
WATER METER LABOR
$23.79
$23.79
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$21.42
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.16
$23.58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
HEWLETT PACKARD
MTCE AGREEMENT
$420.00
$420.00
HI -TEC
DISTANCE WALKER
$28.00
$28.00
JEFF HULTBERG
C10709 HULTBERG
$100.00
010709 HULTBERG
$8.00
$108.00
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
EMPLOYEE SHARE -MAY 1992
$17,030.76
EMPLOYER SHARE -MAY 1992
$42,728.19
$59,758.95*
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO
BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM
$2,555.53
$2,555.53
J & L INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO.
910327 J&L INDUSTRIAL
$1,204.90
$1,204.90
J M PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC.
COMPUTER SYSTEM
$35,064.00
$35,064.00
LAUREL JOHANSON
HLTH INS CONTR REFUND
$45.92
$45.92
J. V. JOHNSON & ASSOC.
SUPPLIES
$233.53
SUPPLIES
$229.06
SUPPLIES
$109.60
SUPPLIES
$281.81
$854.00
NELS J. JOHNSON
TREE REMOVAL
$66.00
$66.00
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT PlR 6 11 92
$254.00
$254.00
ROBERT KUZMANIC
C10425 KUZMANIC
$100.00
$100.00
LAKE -COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY
GASOLINE
$8,783.49
$8,783.49
HUBERT J. LOFTUS, LTD.
REFUND TRANSFER TAX STAMP
$225.00
$225.00
RUBY MALHEUE
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$10.00
$10.00
MARTAM CONSTRUCTION
COMMUTER LOT REHAB
$36,057.00
$36,057.00
MARTIN MARX CO.- INC.
MULTT PLTER
$35,00
$35.00
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
5/92,DEVAULT INS PREM REF
$137.50
5492 DEVAULT INS PREM REF
$412.50
$550.00*
NATIONAL TRAILER STORAGE CORP.
R FUND PAYMENT
.$20.00
$20.00
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
DUE TO FED DEP PR 5128
$1,466.78
DUE TO FED DEP PR 5128
$124.05
DUE TO FED DEP PR 5/28
$96.40
DUE TO FED DEP PR 5128
$12,315.26
DUE TO FED DEP PR 5128
$2,729.25
DUE TO FED DEP PR 5/28
$56.81
$16,788.55*
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
SAVINGS BONDS PR 6411/92
$450.00
$450.00
ORACLE CORPORATION
EQUIPMENT CONVERSION
$369.90
$369.90
ELLEN PLATE
PMT P R 6/11/92
$225.00
$225.00
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT
$3,000.00
$3,000.00*
R & R UNIFORMS INC.
SHIRTS
$37.50-
$37.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6111/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO.
C10727 AJ ROGERS
$100.00
$100.00
WILLIAM SAIKAMI
C10687 SAIKAMI
$100.00
$100.00
ALICE M. SCHROEDER
C10164 SCHROEDER
$25.00
$25.00
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
TOOLS
$89.98
$89,98
SPACE HOME IMPROVEMENT
C8589 SPACE HOME IMP
$50.00
$50.00
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
CHAIR REPL SEATS/BACKS
$2,030.00
$2,030.00
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
OXYGEN BOTTLES
$853.00
$853.00
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
920601 BOND MONEY
$800.00
920602 BOND MONEY
$2,188.00
920609 BOND MONEY
$2,150.00
$5,138.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO POLICE PENSION FUND
$1,064.40
$1,064.40
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$1,949.00
$1,949.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO WATER/SEWER FUND
$1,499.69
$1,499.69
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
C10230 BEAR CONST
$25.00
C10547 BOSTON COFFEE
$25.00
C10603 DEMONTE
$25.00
C8589 SPACE HOME IMP
$50.00
TR TRUST -ELEVATOR
$70.00
$195.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$401.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$31.50
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$2,386.07
$2,818.57
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO IMRF FUND
$264.23
TR TO IMRF FUND
$7,891.66
TR TO IMRF FUND
$765.93
TR TO IMRF FUND
$168.94
TR TO IMRF FUND
$351.88
$9,442.64
VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT FIRE PE
TR TO FIRE PENSION FUND
$266.74
$266.74
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
MICROFILMING/SUPPLIES
$4,182.15
MICROFILMING/SUPPLIES
$817.85
$5,000.00
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
APRIL LEGAL SERVICES
$1,500.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$2,672.55
$4,172.55
WILKIN INSULATION COMPANY
REFUND STICKER
$30.00
$30.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$741,438.74
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
THE CREST GROUP
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$2,020.00
$2,020.00*
PAYMENT
DATE 6/11/92
$137.46
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$450,058.62
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$2,167.87
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$44,974.13
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$4,216.40
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$72,074.21
WATER & SEWER FUND
$88,632.93
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$37,030.95
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$16,697.79
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$3,089.00
POLICE PENSION FUND
$31.50
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$7,692.84
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$14,772.50
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
AD
$80.00
$80.00
THE CREST GROUP
2 -MGR TRNG SESSION
$2,020.00
$2,020.00*
CRYSTAL CATERING, INC.
FRUIT & PUNCH SC GROUP
$137.46
$137.46
JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
FULL PAGE AD
$715.00
$715.00
NORTHWEST SUBURBAN COUNCIL
12 TICKETS -LUNCHEON
$720.00
$720.00*
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$1.00
$30.00
ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF
MISC EXPENSES
$145.00
$146.00*
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
***TOTAL**
$3,818.46
GENERAL FUND $3,818.46
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ALTHEIMER & GRAY
SERVICES RENDERED
112.50
$112.50
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
SUBSCRIPTION
164.50
$164.50
COMPUTER BAY OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CLEANING SVCS
$38.50
$38.50
THE CREST GROUP
2 -MGR TRNG SESSION
$1,010.00
$1,010.00*
THE CREST GROUP
2 -MGR TRNG SESSION
$1,250.00
$1,250.00*
GIERMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
RENEWAL BOND -CLINGER
$30.00
$30.00
ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF
REGISTER PAVLOCK
$140.00
$140.00
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$352.75
PAGE 5
AT&T
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$614.89
$614.89
EDWARD FRANCE
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
$25.00
$25.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
SERVICE
$2,309.02
ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC
REGISTER DIXON
$243.00
$243.00*
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$38.86
$38.86*
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$49.00
$49.00*
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS
MICE CONTRACT RENEWAL
$105.00
$105.00
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DUES/MEALS DIXON
$181.00
$181.00
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
COMM ASST COW MTG
***TOTAL**
$3,362.36
GENERAL FUND
$3,362.36
$26.91
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
SUMMER NEWSLETTER
$352.75
$352.75
AT&T
016 089 7465 001
$614.89
$614.89
EDWARD FRANCE
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$30.63
-
SERVICE
$2,309.02
SERVICE
$50.00
$2,389.65
R.T. JENKINS
SUMMER NEWSLETTER
$300.00
$300.00
J. V. JOHNSON & ASSOC.
SUPPLIES
$11.02$11.02
JOHN KEANE
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
MELANIE KRUPP
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
CAROLYN A. MILLER
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$26.91
MISC EXPENSES
$9.05
$35.96*
APRIL RAJCZYK
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
JERRY RAJCZYK
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
JONNA SHOUB
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$3,879.27
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $3,879.27
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
AIRBORNE EXPRESS
COMPUTER BAY OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THE CREST GROUP
I.B.M. CORPORATION
METRO EXPRESS, INC.
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
TRACS
XEROX CORP.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
FRT CHG PRINT BAND
$25.00
$25.00
CLEANING SVCS
$174.00
CLEANING SVCS
$10.00
$184.00
2 -MGR TRNG SESSION
$240.00
$240.00*
MTCE COMPUTERSZPRINTER
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTERSfPRINTER
$52.00
$246.00
DELIVERY
$19.60
DELIVERY
$23.10
$42.70
TR TAX TRANS MAY92
$430.00
$430.00
MISC EXPENSES
$10.80
$10.80*
REGISTER WIDMER/CRISWELL
$198.00
$198.00*
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$61.73
$61.73
JUNE CONNECT FEE
$50.00
$50.00
SUPPLIES
$817.00
$817.00
MAY MICE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
***TOTAL**
$2.318.27
$2,318.27
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
COMPUTER BAY OF MOUNT PROSPECT
GIER14AN AND ASSOCIATES, INC.
GIFT SERVICE, INC.
SUMMER NEWSLETTER
CLEANING SVCS
BOND -FIELDS
BOND LOWE
CORPORATE CANDY
$4,132.95
$154.00
$30.00
$30.00
$406.36
$4,132.95
$154.00
$60.00
$406.36
VENDOR
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GREMLEY & BIEDERMANN, INC.
R.T. JENKINS
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
SCHWAAB, INC.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PLAT -259 RAND RD
$225.00
$225.00
SUMMER NEWSLETTER
$3,168.00
$3,168.00
NEWSLETTER PAPER
$232.50
NEWSLETTER PAPER
$683.55
$916.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$97.19
$97.19
DELIVERY
$17.50
JUNE SERVICE FEES
DELIVERY
$24.00
$41.50
LEGAL PAGE
$31.65
$31.65
STAMP
$20.35
$20.35
$9,253.05
***TOTAL** $9,253.05
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD
NOV/DEC/MAR SERVICE FEES
$274.20
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 6/3
$21,419.19
MED CLAIMS THRU 6/9
$31,602.80
$53,296.19*
CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS.
RISK MGMT SVCS$500.00
$500.00
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
JUNE SERVICE FEES
$886.00
$886.00
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
WORKER COMP PREMIUM
$1,859.00
$1,859.00
MEDICAL NEUROLOGY ASSOC., S.C.
SERVICES PEYTON
$200.00
$200.00
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ***TOTAL**
$56,741.19
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $56,741.19
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC.
CADENCE
COMPUTER BAY OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THE CREST GROUP
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
HALOGEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC
FRANK KRUPA
NFPA
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SOIL & MATERIAL CONSULTANTS, I
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOCA CERTIFICATE
$35.00
$35.00
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$39.95
$39.95
CLEANING SVCS
$169.00
$169.00
2 -MGR TRNG SESSION
$625.00
2 -MGR TRNG SESSION
$625.00
$1,250.00*
FORMS
$179.00
$179.00
POOL TEST KITS
$46.40
$46.40
CERTIFICATION-JASTER
$35.00
$35.00
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$129.22
$129.22
SUBSCRIPTION
$347.50
$347.50
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$11.99
$11.99
MISC EXPENSES
$10.79
MISC EXPENSES
$9.00
MISC EXPENSES
$12.00
MISC EXPENSES
$16.03
$47.82*
CONCRETE CYLINDERS
$64.00
$64.00
2 RE -INSPECTIONS
$54.00
1 NEW INSPECTION
$50.00
$104.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$61.02
$61.02
MICROFILMING%SUPPLIES
$126.50
$126.50
MAY MICE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
***TOTAL**
$2,659.44
$2,595.44 MOTOR
FUEL TAX FUND
$64.00
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
PARTS
PARTS
SERVICE
$62.70
$371.12 $433.82
$359.40 $359.40
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
ASSOCIATED BAG COMPANY
CALEA
CALIBRE PRESS
COMM. ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW
COMPUSERVE, INC
COMPUTER BAY OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THE CREST GROUP
D-TECTOR, INC.
EVERSON ROSS COMPANY
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
MICHAEL J. GOY
GRAPHIC SERVICES
JOHN GROSS
HEWLETT PACKARD
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE ACADEMY
INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL MGMT.
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LEE AUTO PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GAS -593-057-401-6
$18.79
$18.79
CORRUGATED BOXES
$126.58
$126.58
REGISTER DRAFFONE
$165.00
$165.00
THE ANARCHIST COOKBOOK
$26.00
$26.00 -
3RD PMT REACCRIDITATION
$2,443.75
$2,443.75
COMP SERV INFO
$10.00
$10.00
CLEANING SVCS
$38.50
$38.50
2 -MGR TRNG SESSION
$1,250.00
$1,250.00*
CO BADGES
$102.00
$102.00
SUPPLIES
$4.50
$4.50
SIMONIZ CRIME PREV SQUAD
$39.95
$39.95
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
$39.00
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
$39.00
$78.00
EXPENSES
$24.00
$24.00
BUSINESS CARDS
$50.00
$50.00
EXPENSES
$36.20
$36.20
SUPPORT AGREEMENT
$663.00
SUPPORT AGREEMENT
$90.00
$753.00
SERVICE
$30.93
SERVICE
$100.00
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$22.93
SERVICE
$20.55
$474.41
TUITION-CHARAK NELSON
$508.00
$508.00
TUITION-NICHOL ON
$195.00
TUITION-PAVLOCK
$195.00
$390.00
PARTS
$100.00
PARTS
$165.08
PARTS
$57.80
PARTS
$73.70
PARTS
$459.08
PARTS
$10.20
$865.86
PARTS
$60.56
PARTS
$32.80
PARTS
$16.40
PARTS
$70.24
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PARTS
$67.46
CREDIT
$19.00 -
CREDIT
$6.00-
$222.46
MICROIMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
MAINT CONTRACT
$470.00
$470.0
MIDWAY
AMMUNITION
$459.50
$459.5
NORTHERN ILLINOIS POLICE ALARM
SERVICE
$100.00
$100.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
PHYSICAL%STRESS GIAMBRONE
$486.00
$486.00
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
4 PARTICIPANTS
$1,460.00
$1,460.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$17.59
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$26.98
$44.57
NOTARIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLINO
MEMBER FEE-KANEL
$13.00
$13.00
THOMAS NOWAK
EXPENSES
$76.04
$76.04
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$18.50
MISC EXPENSES
$5.95
MISC EXPENSES
$37.00
MISC EXPENSES
$8.52
MISC EXPENSES
$136.21
$206.18*
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
PROPERTY INVENTORY FORMS
$242.55
$242.55
RAPP'S
PARTS
$279.10
PARTS
$140.14
PARTS
$140.14
$559.38
MARK RECKER
EXPENSES
$114.40
$114.40
WILLIAM ROSCOP
EXPENSES
$142.80
$142.80
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TUITON-CHARAK/LEE
$1,200.00
$1,200.00
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
APR92 LOCKUP/FOOD
$49.65
$49.65
DONNA WOODSIDE
EXPENSES
$30.00
$30.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$14,074.29
GENERAL FUND
$14,074.29
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ACIUS UPGRADE
SOFTWARE UPGRADE
$104.00
$104.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
PARTS
$23.13
SUPPLIES
$75.81
$98.94
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
GAS -593-057-401-6
$23.27
$23.27
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
LINEN SERVICE
$42.77
LINEN SERVICE
$47.31
LINEN
$35.52
$125.60
BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
SUPPLIESRVICE
$907.60
$907.60
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
SERVICE
$255.15
$255.15
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
070 0057060 0
$158.18
$158.18
CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC.
SERVICE
$1 .20
$1 .20
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BA77-JT-2404-A
$9.03
$ 9$9
$9 .03
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$34.00
PARTS
$200.87
PARTS
$48.01
$282.88
FAGEL EMS SPECIALTIES
HELMET MARKERS
$39.50
INCIDENT COMMAND BOARD
$29.95
$69.45
GALL'S, INC.
C
$96.49
MINOLTA ACCESSORY KIT
$21.49
BARRIER TAPE
$49.46
TRAFFIC CONES
$133.98
$301.42
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
FLASHLIGHTS
$152.25
FIREMAN GLOVES
$138.00
TRAFFIC VESTS
$152.50
BOOTS
$306.72
FUSES
$127.65
$877.12
H R HART PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$31.22
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$24.49
$55.71
HI -TEC
DISTANCE WALKER
$.14
$.14
ILL. EMERGENCY SERVICES MGMT.
MEMBERSHIP
$40.00
$40.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$192.14
SERVICE
$75.08
SERVICE
$400.00
SERVICE
$92.44
$759.66
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS SECR.ASSN
1992 MEMBERSHIP
$25.00
$25.00
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
20 HAZMAT BOOKS
$450.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
PAGE 12
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
J. E. KREGER & CO.
LIQUID AIR CORPORATION
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MARTIN MARX CO., INC.
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
MOTOROLA, INC.
NFPA
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
PATHFINDER ASSOC INC
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PHYSIO -CONTROL
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
QUALEX, INC.
ROBOTRONICS INC.
SIANA BAKERY
SOCIETY OF FIRE PROTECTION
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN.
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
MANUALS
REGISTER REINLEIN
REFLECTIVE DECALS
CYLINDER RENTAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MULTI PLIER
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
WORKSHOP -D STEWARD
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PLUGGIE BADGES-CFSF
ASST DONUTS FOR CLASS
MEMBERSHIP
M87 -YOKE
RAZOR BLADES
MICROFILMING/SUPPLIES
$51.20
$75.00
$576.20
$338.04
$338.04
$20.00
$20.00
$292.45
$11.55
$304.00
$2.48
$2.48
$723.01
$723.01
$620.19
620.19
$312.75
9312.75
$61.10
$61.10
$75.00
$75.00
$15.92
$2.36
$24.03
$10.00
$18.85
5.69
$ 0.00
$43.18
$150.03*
$153.25
$153.25
$383.14
$383.14
$7.02
$21.82
$108.72
$17.46
$155.02
$318.00
$318.00
$21.24
$21.24
$60.00
$60.00
$25.48
$25.48
$11.70
$11.70
$206.68
$206.68
***TOTAL** $8,762.66
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6111192
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $8,686.85 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $75.81
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
RITA ADAMCZYK
ALEXIAN BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTE
AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE,INC.
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
ARA CORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
WILL ASHLEY
LEONARD W. BAZAN
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
CENTER FOR APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY
COASTAL VIDEO COMMUNIC. CORP.
COMMUNITY CAB CO.
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
JUDY FELL
CAROLYN HENDERSON
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
KEEFER'S PHARMACY
LISA LEVIN
RAY LUNDIN
LINDA MARKAY
NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
MAY DRIVER REIMB
REGISTER MORGAN1ABERNATHY
$30.00
$30.00*
STEP PARENT HANDBOOKS
$181.07
$181.07
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$404.25
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$904.20
$1,308.45
COFFEE
$50.00
$50.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$227.90
$227.90
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
MAY DRIVER REIMB
$15.00
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
$18.00
$33.00
FLOWERS
$115.00-
$115.00
PUPPETS
$79.95
$79.95
BLOODBORNE PATHOGENS BOOK
$15.21
$15.21
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$182.65
$182.65
MTCE AGREEMENT
$595.00
$595.00
LUNCHEONISUPPLIES
$35.00
LUNCHEON%SUPPLIES
$86.88
$121.88
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
SERVICE
$400.00
$400.00
SUPPLIES
$70.44
SUPPLIES
$65.90
SUPPLIES
$63.95
$200.29
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
MAY DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$18.00
MAY DRIVER REIMB
$24.00
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
$27.00
$51.00
MAY DRIVER REIMB
$3.00
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$12.00
REGISTER FOLEY
$95.00
$95.00*
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$26.08
$26.08
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
NORTHWEST SUBURBAN ASSOC. OF
NORTHWEST SUBURBAN COUNCIL FOR
NURSING 92
OPERATION ABLE, INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OTTO SCHERR
JEANNE SHERMAN
BERTHA STEIL
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
KATHI WESLEY
HELEN WHITLOCK
VIRGINIA ZITO
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MEMBERSHIP DUES
MEMBERSHIP
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
MAY DRIVER REIMB
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
MAY DRIVER REIMB
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
MAY DRIVER REIMB
CHAIR REPL SEATS/BACKS
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
MAY DRIVER REIMB
MAY DRIVER REIMB
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
APRIL DRIVER REIMB
MAY DRIVER REIMB
$4,336.24
INVOICE AMOUNT
$125.00
$15.00
$38.95
$75.00
$35.98
$16.25
$92.50
$12.00
$15.00
$12.00
$12.00
$9.00
$12.00
$30.08
$12.00
$12.00
$6.00
$9.00
$15.00
$15.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 14
TOTAL
$125.00
$15.00
$38.95
$75.00
*
$144.73*
$27.00
$24.00
$21.00
$30.08
$24.00
$15.00
$30.00
$41336.24
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
NATIONAL/CHAPTER DUES
$133.00
$133.00
STAN BURMEISTER
SERVICES RENDERED
$100.00
$100.00
CD PUBLICATIONS
SUBSCRIPTION
$329.00
$329.00
COMPUTER BAY OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CLEANING SVCS
$77.00
$77.00
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SERVICES RENDERED
$75.00
$75.00
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
AMERICAN LABELMARK COMPANY
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
BERTHOLD NURSERY
ART BRIGGS
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
CADE INDUSTRIES
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPAIRS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$380.00
PAGE 15
$129.92
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PARTS
11.94
PAYMENT DATE 6111192
817.45
VENDOR`
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
$358.90
1-2 GAL DISPENSER
$84.65
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$36.20
$36.20
THE PERFECT IMAGE
PHOTO PROCESSING
$5.00
$5.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$24.23
$24.23*
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
PARTS
***TOTAL**
$779.43
GENERAL FUND
$471.43 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$308.00
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
AMERICAN LABELMARK COMPANY
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
BERTHOLD NURSERY
ART BRIGGS
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
CADE INDUSTRIES
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
FIRE ALARM SYSTEM REPAIRS
$380.00
$380.00
PARTS
$129.92
PARTS
11.94
PARTS
817.45
PARTS
$154.55
$313.86
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$358.90
$358.90
1-2 GAL DISPENSER
$84.65
SAFETY GLASSES
$7.18
$91.83
MAY MICE
$147.00
JUNE MICE
$147.00
$294.00
KEYS
$19.40
$19.40
PARTS
$3.72
$3.72
BUSHES
$135.00
TREE
$131.00
$266.00
SjC SIDEWALK
$70.00
$70.00
SUUPPLIES
$34.57
SUPPLIES
$9.32
$43.89
SUPPLIES
$499.50
SUPPLIES
$499.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$592.50
$1,591.50
WATER USAGE
$71.97
$71.97
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6111192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
SUPPLIES
$261.60
SHREDDED HARDWOOD
$11.25
$272.85
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
JUNE 92 JANITORIAL SVC
$3,592.00
$3,592.00
CONRAD AND SON
SUPPLIES
$42.58
FRIES AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC
SUPPLIES
STUMP REMOVAL
$169.78
$225.00
$212.36
$225.00
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.70
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.98
$303.68
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$264.56
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
TIRES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
$303.36
$1,232.00
$567.92
$1,232.00
RICHARD D. HOYT
REFUND SIDEWALK
$96.00
$96.00
KAR PRODUCTS INC
SUPPLIES
$163.58
$163.58
KINDER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
EYE BOLTS
$22.50
$22.50
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
VEHICLE RENTALS
$3,255.00
$3,255.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$29.74
PARTS
$45.37
LEE JENSEN SALES CO., INC.
PARTS
2 BINDING STRAPS
$13.00
$48.00
$88.11
$48.00
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
1 KIT HOOD DECAL SET
$57.15
$57.15
MARTAM CONSTRUCTION
COMMUTER LOT ASPHALT
$880.00
$880.00
MARV'S APPLIANCE SERVICE
REPLACE THERMO DIST
$83,00
$83.00
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$80.89
PARTS
$124.12
PARTS
$13.99
PARTS
$19.08
GERALD MECOZZI
CREDIT
SIC SIDEWALK
$3.80-
$105.00
$234.28
$105.00
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
2 CASES BLACK TONER
$175.58
MINOLTA COPIER
$1,012.46
$1,188.04*
MONSANTO COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$17.42
$17.42
GEORGE MUELLER
SjC SIDEWALK
$140.00
$140.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUIIPPLIES
$24.41
SUPPLIES
$283.24
SUPPLIES
$19.10
SUPPLIES
$25,85
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
$38.36
$.96
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICEE390
SUPPLIES
$19.80
$19.80
$19
NOVAK & PARKER INC.
REPAIR RANGE
$
$59.95*
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$6.95
$6.e8
MISC EXPENSES
$2.49
$9.37*
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$34.11
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$11.10
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$34.02
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.13
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.68
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$4.86
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$66.76
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$4.27
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$29.00
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$8.52
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$84.15
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$61.73
$343.33*
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
MICE SUPPLIES
$58.25
$58.25
WERNER REINKE
SfC SIDEWALK
$140.00
$140.00
ROADWORKS, INC.
CUURB & GUTTER PROGRAM
$102,222.90
$102,222.90
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
TOXIC SUB DISPOSAL CONTAIN
$77.75
$77.75
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
PARTS
$88.76
PARTS
$100.99
PARTS
$268.90
$458.65
JACK SINKLER
S/C SIDEWALK REPL
$140.00
$140.00
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
GAALV STEEL NIPPLES
$12.69
$12.69
TECH SYN CORPORATION
HOSE ASSEMBLY
$101.31
$101.31
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
HELIUM CYLINDERS
$113.06
$113.06
KELLY M. UDELHOFEN
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$39.00
$39.00
WESTERN DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
PARTS
$157.01
$157.01
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$120,682.99
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $17,203.68 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $103,454.90
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $24.41
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
BERTHOLD NURSERY
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
COMARK, INC.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
R. L. CORTY & COMPANY
CUES, INC.
DURABLE PAVING CO.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO
G & K SERVICES
G.E.M. CONSTRUCTION INC.
GEO-SYNTHETICS, INC.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
PARTS
$115.14
PARTS
$74.29
PARTS
$67.05
$256.48
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$501.19
$501.19
PARTS
$22.04
PARTS
$20.54
$42.58
BUSHES
$128.00
$128.00
2 SPRING BRAKE CHAMBERS
$130.00
$130.00
MICE AGREEMENT
$2,235.00
$2,235.00
BB72-JT-5608-D
$147.59
BB72-JT-8548-A
$12.08
$159.67
VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA
$104,946.00
OPER./MAINT.COSTS-JAWA
$13,001.00
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
$154,462.00
POWER COSTS-JAWA
$10,790.00
$283,199.00
WATER HEATER
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
SUPPLIES
$231.78
$231.78
ASPHALT RESTORATION
$3,935.00
$3,935.00
DELIVERIES
$264.50
$264.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$472.90
$472.90
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.69
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.98
$303.67
CONCRETE RESTORATION
$1,719.00
$1,719.00
GEOBLOCK
$596.00
$596.00
MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$52.00
$246.00
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$203.83
SERVICE
$533.12
SERVICE
$37.55
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6111192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$61.25
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$97.32
SERVICE
$18.19
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$34.96
$1,408.74
ILLINOIS ENVIR. PROT. AGENCY
RENEWAL CERT-ANDLER
$10.00
$10.00
JULIE, INC.
APRIL 92 SERVICE
$245.41
APRIL 92 SERVICE
$15.64
$261.05
KAR PRODUCTS INC
SUPPLIES
$163.58
$163.58
WADE KOLB
REIMB AUTO CAD CLASS
$155.00
$155.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$395.00
$396.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$91.00
PARTS
$13.00
PARTS
$65.00
PARTS$39.00
$208.00
MASTERACK
SEAT
$
$135.73
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$25.73
$25.98
PARTS
$69.12
PARTS
$68.93
PARTS
$21.59
PARTS
$20.69
PARTS
$69.33
PARTS
$4.44
PARTS
$23.71
PARTS
$21.48
CREDIT
$11.80 -
CREDIT
$36.91-
$276.56
MOTION DYNAMICS INC.
REBUILD ENGINE
$1,547.00
$1,547.00
MUNICIPAL MARKING DISTRIBUTORS
SUPPLIES
$215.22
$215.22
NET MIDWEST, INC.
MAY92 WATER SAMPLES
$105.00
$105.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA
$20.04
117 N WAVERLY
$33.50
$53.54
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$143.20
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6111/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
SUPPLIES
$394.80
SUPPLIES
$246.41
SUPPLIES
$52.74
SUPPLIES
$21.62
SUPPLIES
$11.46
SUPPLIES
$91.45
$961.68
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$396.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$35.40
$431.45
OMNI -PARTS, INC.
REPAIR PUMP
$2,567.00
$2,567.00
OPUS
VILLAGE SHARE -KENSINGTON
$21,000.00
$21,000.00
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
LEGAL PAGE
$18.46
$18.46
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$21.10
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
$61.10
PAPERDIRECT, INC.
SUPPLIES
$61.80
$61.80
PENMETRICS, INC.
SOFTWATE
$25.00
$25.00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$32.02
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$4.92
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$16.76
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$36.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3.84
TRAVEL F SUPPLTF.S
$79.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$21.44
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$1.96
$195.94*
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$510.83
$510.83*
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
MTCE SUPPLIES
$58.25
$58.25
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$14.49
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$10.49
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$6.89
FILM & PROCESSING
$11.22
FILM & PROCESSING
$21.22
$64.31
ROSEMONT GARDENS
TIMBERS
$130.00
$130.00
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
SOCKET
$18.71
$18.71
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
ENVELOPES
$216.15
$216.15
TAKING KARE OF BUSINESS
PKWY RESTORATION
$5,827.50
$5,827.50
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
GLENDALE VISOR
$6.57
$6.57
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C MAY LAND LEASE $968.80 $968.80
MARTAM CONSTRUCTION COMMUTER LOT REHAB $9,913.00 $9,913.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 19 NORTHWEST HWY $88.72 $88.72
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $15.86 $15.86*
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $10,986.38
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $10,986.38
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
CENTER FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PUBLICATION $23.00 $23.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $23.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$23.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/11/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WESTERN DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
REPAIRS-HEADGASKETS
$2,978.36
$2,978.36
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$337,489.30
WATER & SEWER FUND
$337,489.30
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C MAY LAND LEASE $968.80 $968.80
MARTAM CONSTRUCTION COMMUTER LOT REHAB $9,913.00 $9,913.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 19 NORTHWEST HWY $88.72 $88.72
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $15.86 $15.86*
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $10,986.38
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $10,986.38
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
CENTER FOR BUSINESS MANAGEMENT PUBLICATION $23.00 $23.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $23.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$23.00
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR'
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
COSBY AND BELL.
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
EMERGE A STAR
A. J. MAGGIO CO.
THE SIGN PALACE
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
MOUNT PROSPECT 75TH ANNIV.COMM
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6111%92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
MAY LEGAL SVCS $484.69
SERVICES RENDERED $200.00
IST PMT AMBULANCE RECHASSIS $33,709.00
CONSTRUCTION P&F BLDG $25,754.00
2 BLAZERS $600.00
APR92 LOCKUP/FOOD $50.00
***TOTAL**
$34,309.00 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$484.69
BANNER INSTALL&REMOVE
6 FLAGS
ROPE & CABLE
BANNER REMOVAL
BUDGET ALLOCATION
$8,381.67
$900.00
$683.63
$273.04
S525.00
$6,000.00
***TOTAL**
DEBT SERVICE
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND TRANSFER FEES $500.00
BOND TRANSFER FEES $846.05
PAGE 22
TOTAL
$484.69
$200.00*
$33,705.00*
$25,754.00*
$600.00
$50.00
$60,797.69
$26,004.00
$2;381.67
$6,000.00
$8.,381.67
PENSIONS
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $200.00
CHARLES W. NICK JUNE92 PENSION $883.22 $883.22
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JULY MEDICAL INSURANCE $510.00 $510.00
PAUL H. WATKINS JULY DISABILITY BENEFIT $1,456.83 $1,456.83
PENSIONS ***TOTAL*+1 $3,050.05
GENERAL FUND
$883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
$1,395,765.57
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 23
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6111192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
DEBT SERVICE
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$506.12
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$290.65
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$209.35
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$578.92
$2,931.09.
DEBT SERVICE
***TOTAL**
$2,931.09
POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & 11991A
$290.65 FLOOD CONTROL B & I
1991A
$209.35
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D
$500.00 CAPITAL IMPROVMENT
B & I 1992A
$506.12
FLOOD CONTROL B & I 1992A
$846.05 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT
B & I 1992B
$578.92
PENSIONS
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $200.00
CHARLES W. NICK JUNE92 PENSION $883.22 $883.22
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JULY MEDICAL INSURANCE $510.00 $510.00
PAUL H. WATKINS JULY DISABILITY BENEFIT $1,456.83 $1,456.83
PENSIONS ***TOTAL*+1 $3,050.05
GENERAL FUND
$883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
$1,395,765.57
DATE RUN 6111/92
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TIME RUN 11.20.31
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING
SUMMARY BY FUND 6/11/92
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$529,322.85
21
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$2,190.87
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$148,493.03
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$4,524.40
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$72,074.21
31
BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$426,122.23
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$48,017.33
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$34,309.00
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$73,438.98
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$3,189.22
53
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$26,004.0.0
56
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$484.69
64
POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & I 1991A
$290.65
67
FLOOD CONTROL B & I 1991A
$209.35
68
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11987D
$500.00
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$31.50
73
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$7,692.84
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$14,772.50
91
CAPITAL IMPROVMENT B & I 1992A
$506.12
92
FLOOD CONTROL B & I 1992A
$846.05
93
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1992B
$578.92
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
$1,395,765.57
PAGE 24
ID-APPBAR
CAF/
5/15/92
ORDINANCE No. 4438
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIV ENTITLED "SIGN REVIEW BOARD"
OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 5.1402.A entitled "Membership" of
Chapter 5 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended; so that hereinafter said Section 5.1402.A
of Chapter 5 shall be and read as follows:
See. 5.1402. Membership.
A. The voting members of the Sign Review Board shall be seven
(7) members. 11
SECTION TWO: That Section 5.1402.A.3 entitled "Membership" of
Chapter 5 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended; so that hereinafter said Section 5.1402.A.3
of Chapter 5 shall be and read as follows:
3. The membership of the Sign Review Board shall consist of the
following:
Two (2) members of existing advisory commissions of the
Village;
Two (2) members who shall be residents of the Village; and
Two (2) members to be recommended by the Mount Prospect
Chamber of Commerce who shall be in the design profession;
One (1) member to be recommended by the Mount Prospect
Chamber of Commerce who shall be a Mount Prospect retail
or service business owner.
SECTION THREE: That Section 5.1403.D entitled "Organization" of
Chapter 5 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended; so that hereinafter said Section 5.1403.D
of Chapter 5 shall be and read as follows:
D. For the purpose of conducting business four (4) members of the
Sign Review Board shall be deemed a quorum. 11
SECTION FOUR* That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the
manner provided by law.
AYES: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Corcoran
PASSED and APPROVED this 2nd day of June 1992.
/S/ Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Village President
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
Passed in absence of Village President's signature.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JUNE 8, 1992
SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN SENIOR HOUSING OPTION AGREEMENT
The attached Option Agreement has been prepared to provide Catholic Charities with the
necessary site control required for completing their HUD Section 202 application for a
senior housing development in Mount Prospect.
The Option Agreement has been modified to incorporate the changes asked for during the
June 2 meeting of the Board. Please note that the term "exclusive" has been removed from
Item No 1, Grant of Option, and Item No. 7, Assignment, has been re -written in order to
clarify the assignability of the option. We would also note that Item No. 3.(c) (i) has been
modified to include Catholic Charities Senior Housing Development.
If you have any questions regarding the senior housing project or this Option Agreement
and would like to have them answered prior to the meeting on June 16, please give me a
call.
DMC:hg
Enclosure
THIS OPTION AGREEMENT (this "Agreement") is made and executed as of this
day of, 1992 by and between the VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, an Minis _ municipal corporation (the "Village"), and CATHOLIC
CHARITIES, a not-for-profit corporation ("Catholic Charities").
WITNESSETH;
WHEREAS, the Village holds fee simple title to that certain parcel of real estate
consisting of approximately 43,000 square feet (1 acre) and located at the southeast comer
of Central Road and Pine Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois, which property is legally
described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, in connection with the redevelopment by the Village of its downtown
shopping district (the "Redevelopment"), the Village desires to facilitate the construction of
a downtown Section 202 Senior Housing Project on the property, consisting of no more than
eighty (80) residential units and which is no more than five (5) stories in height (the
"Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Village has heretofore approved the application of Catholic Charities
for the development of the Project on the Property, and the Village has undertaken to
comply with legal requirements respecting the conveyance of the Property to Catholic
Charities for the development of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Village desires to grant to Catholic Charities, and Catholic Charities
desires to acquire from the Village, an option to purchase the Property upon the terms and
conditions hereinafter set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein and
other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the parties hereto hereby agree as follows:
1. Grant of Option, The Village hereby grants to Catholic Charities the right
and option (the "Option") to purchase all of the Village's right, title and interest in and to
the Property for the development of the Project at a purchase price which shall equal the
average of two (2) appraisals of the Property prepared by two (2) independent appraisers
chosen by the Village and otherwise upon such terms and conditions as shall be mutually
agreed upon by the parties.
2. Option Term. The term of the Option shall commence on the date hereof and
terminate as of October 30, 1992; provided, however, that in the event that Catholic
Charities delivers to the Village a Fund Reservation letter from the Department of Housing
and Urban Development ("HUD") prior to October 30, 1992, the term of the Option shall
be automatically extended until March 31, 1994 (the "Option Term").
ME
3. Q2nditions of Option. This Option is subject to, conditioned upon, and may
be exercised only upon the satisfaction of the following conditions:
(a) the development and operation of the Project by Catholic Charities, or its
Permitted Assignee (as defined below), with no more than eighty (80)
residential units and which is no more than five (5) stories in height;
(b) the compliance by Catholic Charities with all applicable ordinances or
regulations of the Village, except as may be modified or waived by the Village
in the manner provided by law, and the development of the Project in
conformity in all respects with all applicable federal and state statutes and
regulations; and
(c) either
(i) the completion and approval by the Village of a Planned Unit
Development Ordinance and site plan for the Redevelopment, including
the Catholic Charities Senior Housing development; or
(ii) the successful rezoning and zoning variations for the Property by
the Village to allow the development and operation of the Project.
4. Exerciseofd( ption, Upon the satisfaction of the conditions contained in
Paragraph 3 above, Catholic Charities may exercise the Option upon written notice to the
Village at any time within the Option Term.
5. VilIgge. Anroval. The Village hereby covenants to Catholic Charities that the
Village has approved the terms of this Option Agreement by Resolution of the Board of
Trustees of the Village dated June 2, 1992.
6. Catholic CharitiesAnnroval„ Catholic Charities hereby covenants to the
Village that Catholic Charities has approved and ratified the terms of this Option
Agreement and that the parties executing this Agrement on behalf of Catholic Charities
have the authority to bind Catholic Charities to the terms of this Agreement.
7. Assignability, This Option Agreement may be assigned by Catholic Charities
only to a single asset corporation established for the sole purpose of developing this project.
However, it may not be assigned to any other person, firm or entity.
8. Entire Agreemen. t. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between
the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and each and every prior agreement,
statement and understanding made by the parties hereto with respect to the subject matter
hereof is hereby merged into this Agreement.
9. Amendment, No change in the provisions of this Agreement shall be effective
unless made in writing and signed by the parties hereto.
-2-
10. Governing Uw, This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted under
the laws of the State of Illinois.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement as of the
day and year first above written.
ATTEST:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
an Illinois Municipal Corporation
By*
Village Clerk Its -
CATHOLIC CHAR=S, a not-for-profit
ATTEST: corporation
By:
Its-
-3-
CAF
5/28/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN OPTION AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND MHOLIC CUMITIES
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is the owner of certain
property consisting of approximately 43,000 square feet (1 acre)
generally located at the southeast corner of Central Road and Pine
Street (referred to as Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is considering the
construction of no more than eighty (80) residential units to be
built at a height not to exceed five (5) stories on the Subject
Property; and
WHEREAS, Catholic Charities has expressed an interest in developing
the Subject Property in accordance with the redevelopment plan
established by the Village; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board
the best interests of the Village
an Option Agreement with Catholic
the Subject Property; and
of Trustees have determined that
would be served by entering into
Charities for the development of.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President and Board of Trustees do hereby
authorize execution of an option Agreement between the Village of
Mount Prospect and Catholic Charities for the proposed development
of the Subject Property, a copy of said Option Agreement is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO:. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by
law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
I
, 1988.
JUN 12 '92 10:53PM I;Rr4S7EIh LEHR CHGO
R.2/3
ARNSTEIN & LEHR
120 SOUTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA , SUITE 1200 - CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60SM3913
(312) 3797100 aAAWINIMON, ILLINOIS
PAX (312) ff"M WEST PAW SL4H, FLOMIDA
TILD 910-22t,142
Everette M Rif Jr MiLWA4IK19, W19CONSIN
(312) 876-7574
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Mr. John Dixon
Village of Mount Prospect
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr.
DATE- June 12, 1992
RE.* IBT Franchise Agreement
I was asked to review the proposed :BT Franchise Agreement
as negotiated by the Illinois Municipal League on behalf of its
constituent municipalities. I comment as follows:
This is far from being an ideal document. It is written in
stilted legalese with many of the provisions requiring re -reading
before their meanings can be deciphered. This problem, of
course, is unrelated to the content and could have been corrected
with a little attention to drafting.
With respect to the content, the primary areas of concern
are compensation for use of right-of-way, burial of future and
existing facilities, and liability exposure. it is my opinion
that the liability exposure aspect is adequate. The burial of
facilities- provision grants very little consideration' to the
municipalities in that IBT agrees only to bury those facilities
as required by the Illinois Commerce Commission. This, of
course, it would be required to do irrespective of an agreement
with the municipalities. The access line fee to be paid by IBT
to the municipalities is 38t per line pet month. This hardly
seems adequate for the extensive use of our right-of-way.
However, in many respects this Agreement was negotiated in a
vacuum, and it is difficult to place a value on the use of
municipal right-of-way, especially within the context of a
franchise agreement that has state-wide applicability.
Clearly, the Illinois Municipal League believes that this
document reflects the best possible agreement with IBT negotiated
under difficult and adhesive circumstances. The rights of
municipalities with respect to such public utility franchise
agreement are still evolving, and for the most part, still
extremely limited.
�UN 12 '92 10:53AN ARNSTEIH LEHR CHGO P.3/3
Mr. John Dixon
June 12, 1992
Page 2
I am recommending adoption of the Agreement only because to
attempt to negotiate a separate agreement with ZBT would be a
major undertaking for which the municipality would probably have
to be prepared for litigation. Even if we were to leave the
content of the Agreement intact and offer to IST an improvement
of the form of the Agreement, it would probably be met with great
resistance. A bright spot of the Agreement Is that it is only
for ten years tpassed franchise agreements with public utilities
have been much larger) and it Is hoped that sometime during the
course of the next ter years, municipalities will gain greater
leverage from both state and federal legibldtiUn With respect tO
the enfranchisement of public utilities.
\\HGM\EMH2A-15
F R F JIM iN, A, rg , C..
95.'8.1942 I L dd P. :;
A(kRCCMGNT FOR use or TmE PUBLIC WAY
611111011"A"011 #
AGNIISUNNT FOR USE
BE IT ORDAINEC BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF FRUSTECS OF THE VILLAGE OF
SECTION t DURATION
That the ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, (hereinafter referred to as "lhe Company"), its lessees,
twoueawris and assigns, are herety ;ranted lite right lu construct, efect, anew, maintain and operate in,
upon, along, across, under and over the streets, alloys and public ways of the
(hereinafter referred to as Itne Munlri;pajiW), lines of poles, anchors,
wires, cables, conduits, vaults, laterals and fiber optics other fixtures and a4ulpment, and to use the same for
the transmlss!on of sounds and signals by means of slacirfaty or light, and especially for the conduct of a
general telephone oul;lnos3 for the period of ton (1 Of years from and et.ar 016 effective date of this ordinance
and thereafter until termInatso by sixty (60) days written nolloe elthier Dy the Municipailty to the Company, or by
the Company to the Muricipality. The provisions of this Agreement shall be renegotiated upon, written nolkua
from one party to the other at any time after July 1, 2000, Any new terms End r*nclitlona agreed to as a result
of such renegotiation shall be effective upon the expiration of this Agreement In acoordence with the terms
contained hereln unlese ',he parties agree otherwise,
SECTION 2. EXISTING FACILITIES; PERMIT REQUIREMENTS
(a) Existing Facilities
Ths location end height above or the depth below the public 11horcloghfaies of the existing lines of poles,
anchors wires, cables, conduits, vaults, laterals and other flAures end squirmait of the Company (hareinaftev
referred to as Istructures'), within the Municipality ars hareby approved, ,qnd the same shall be maintained and
operated under and subject to the provisions of this ordinance, Any change in or extension of any of said
structures or the construction of any additional structures, In, upon, along, across, under or over the streets,
alleys and public ways of the Municipaidy shall be made under the direction of the individual designated by the
Municipality or such officer as may be designated from time4o.tlme by the goverring body of the Municipality
tar that purpose, (hareinafter referred to an Wriltipal T04opmroorle.ations Ropratentativo or MTR). The
height above public thoroi.ighfarat of all earial wires and cables harealter constructed shall conform to the
le,quIrsi-rents of lite 11fincils, Commerce Cummitivivri vr other regulatory Dotty having lurlsolotion thereof, All
structures hereattair Installed mall be so placed, and all Arcrk in corinsctfon with such!nstallaWn shall be so
performed, as not to Interfere unreasonably with, ordinary travel on the highways of the INIuricipallty or with any
3
FROM hd, W. Y1, C,
14:48 G. 4
municipal water or sewer pipes then in place, and In case cl bringing to grade cr change of grade, or change of
width of any street or alley, the Company, provided h Is notified thereof in writing at least thirty (30) days prior
to the commencement thereof, shall change he structures so as to conform thereto, except where such change
of grade or width of any street or alley Is made in connection with the rearrangement, separation or alteration
of railroad crossings or Is Incident to any such rmrvarigorritint, separation or ait,)ratlon. T4, tops of all vaults
constructed by the Company wWn the Municipality shali Dreson't an even surface with the pavement at the
Point where laid, arid, subject to the exception contained In the last preceding sentence, shall be lowered or
raised by the Company to conform to the top of paving or improvement as required by the governing body of
the Municipality whenever the grade of the street or alley in which any such vault Is located may be at any firne
hereafter lowered or raised.
(b) Permit Required
The construction and installation of said facilities or any cf)allgs thereof Including extension, reduction or
removal of the telecommunications systems shall be subjac to the issuance of a p#irnft tharafc,,a by the MTS,
No telecommunications faclilly shall be laid or Installed In of under any streets, alleys or other public way until
a permit therefore Is issued by the MTR Said permit shalt ;plicate the time, Manner and place of laying or
Installing each telecommunications facility, Permit aPprovai vhal! be granted If the proposed Improvements are
consistent with the use of the pubile way granted by this ,Agreement. Each application for a permit shall be
accompanied by prints, plans and maps showing the proposed location of each tW000mmunications facility to
be laid or Installed, the loca!lon of each condult to be entered, and the number of manholes or other opanl%s
to gain access to said conduit. In the event of an Omargqncy wKch the Company believes Posse a threat of
Immediate harm to the ptiblic or to any Of the Company's faclMles. the Company shall be permitted access
to the public way to ameliorate the threatened harm without the benefit of a permit, provided however, the
Company shall advise the Municipality of the emergency at his earliest opperlunIty and took a Proper permit
within a reasonable period of time thereafter.
(c) Noncompliance of Facilities
The WnIcipalfty reserves the fight 10 Make Physical on -&Its Inspections of the telecommunications systems
at Its discretion. The Company shall correct or substantially correct any default or nonconforinance with the
Municipa0ty's written, publicly available Installation standards, weather or conditions beyond the reasonable
control of the Company permitting, within thirty (30) days of receipt of written notification (hereinafter "the
30 day correction period") from the MTR If the MTR determines that the Company has not corrected or
substantially corrected the default or nonconformance and has 80 advised the Company in writing, the
Company must submit a time table within five (5) days of the lapse of the 30 day correction period to the
Municipality specifying the anticipated data of completion, In inn emergency, affecting the public health,
safety and welfare in the public way as determined by the M7 R. the Company shall Imme0ately correct
the default or nonconformance. If the Municipality. In the exercise of its reasonable dist;retlon, determines
that the Company has not substantially corrected the emergency Mihin live ~6) days of such an order, the
Company shall be In default and shall pay the Municipality liquidated damages of Five Hundred Dollars
($500) per day, each day after the live day period that the Company falls to substantially correct the default
or noncompliance,
=1
FRjM 'i.1J, N. u.
55.-x,.13._. 1.: ,, 0. 5
(d) Maps
Upon reeuest by the Municipailty, the Company shall 'Ile with the MTR a map which details existing and new
facilitlee. Subject to the provisions of the Illinois Freodom of information Act, !!I Rev, Stal, Ch 116, par 201 at.
sept (1989), any maps, plans or ;crewing® depleting Company faclNtles that have been properly designated
"Confidential" shall be regarded by the Municipality as proprietary and confidential as to third parties, The
foregoing shall not apply to any information which the Municipality can demonstrate Is In the public domain
through no breach of this Agreement try Ihs Municloality. The Company and Municipaiity agree, to the extent
practicable, to exercise their best efforts to croroinate the timing of the construction activities of each, so as to
minimize any pubilc Inconvenience, On or about January 1, of each year, or las otherwise agreed to by itis
parties, the Company shall most with the Municipality to detail, to the extent possible, Its currently planned
construction activities within the Municipaiily.
SECTION 3. REPAIR OF COMPANY WORK SITES,
The Company, after doing any excavating or mnstrucuon worts shall, at. its sole test and expense, promptly
repair and restore the alto including all sidewalks. parkways or pavements disturtxo by the Company to the
condition in which !t existed prior to the performance of the work, of nearly as practicable as determined by
the Municipality in the exercise of Its reasonable discretion, Ir, the event that any such sidewalk, parkway
or pavement shall become uneven, unsettled, or otherwise requires repalr!ng, because of such disturbance
by the Company, then, the Company, as soon as climatic conditions will permit, shalt promptly, upon receipt
of notice from the Municipality so to two, cause such stde'valK, parkway or pavement to be i*vslred or restored
to the condition in which!t existed before said sidewalk, parkway or pavement was disturbed by the Company,
Such restoration shalt be completed wltnin ten (W) days after the date of commenc�ement of such restoration
work. In the event that the Company fails to commence and complete the restoration, work in the manner and
within the time paricds prescribed herein, the Municipality may, but steal! have no obligation to, perform such
work and recover from the Company any .,oats and expenses the Municipality Incurs. In the event that such
public way or Improvement cannot be so repaired, replaced or restored, the Company shall )ustly compensate
the Municipality. All excavations In lawns or grassy parkways shat! be Immediately backf lied, tamped and then
restored within a reasonable time thereafter to the original condition with sod or hyaroseed In accordance with
the applicable provisions of this Agreement. The Company shall keep all structures which it shall consirucl by
virtue of this ordinance, In a reasonably safe condition Rt all times, and shall ,maintain such barriers and danger
signals during the construction, repair or renewal work performed hereunder as will reasonably avoid danger to
life, limb and property.
SECTION 4. DEFENSE, INDEMNIFICATION OF MUNICIPALITY
The company shall, at Its own expense, defend ail suits that may be brought against the Muniolpal!ly on
account of or In connection with the violation by the Company of any of the obligations hereby Imposed upon
or assumed by it, or by reason of or In connection with any dama;o to life, ilmb or property connected with Its
failure to most Its obligation hereunder or any of the structures constructed or maintalned by It under tr by
virtue of this Agreement, and 'hold and save the Municlpality harmless from any and all liability and expense
as herein defined. As used In this Section, liability and expenses shall include juagments, costs and damage
for or associated with removal, relocation, alteration, repair maintenance and restoration of the structures or
ME
Fa011 N. W.N
1)5,".:9.195. 1-!�? . . 6
appliances herein authorized, and for any and all damages hereto and on accou: it of Ilia local on, constructor,
alteration, repair or maintononoe of any pubilo ways, nciudin9 bridges, tunlafti, va:.Ifts, sewers, water mains,
conduits, pipes. poles end other public utilities.
The govemlrg body of the Municipailty may, Jnder the direction of the Company or Its att&neys, assist
In defending any such claim or suit. The Company snbli not be required to reimburse the Municipality for
expenses Incurred by h In case of the election so to assist.
The Company shall, at its own expense, Indemnify and hold harmless the MunictloWity and Its officors, agents
and employees, from liability, arising out of eft Judgments or settlements, Including reasonable attorney fees,
whether for personal Injury, bodily, .njury; property damage or loss or interruption of utility aArvice srlsing out
of the reconstruction, Installwian, malntenance or other operaiii)ris of the Company.
SECTION S. U$9 OF POLES 6Y MUNICIPALITY
Du ring the term of this Agreement and while the Company Is using any pole or poles erected or maintained
hereunder; it will permit the Murdcipafity the use Of Special, 11 such space is not required for Company needs,
for attaching the Murncipaii1y's police and fire alarm signal wirse;, provided that the police and fire efarrn system
s provided to the public without charge, Any such attachments are to be in accordance with Specifications
de6lgnated by the Company and all work will be partormed by the Municipality at Its expanse at the top of
the space available for the use of the Company on any of said poles, ft being understood that the po es upon
which space is permitted for use by the Municipality shah be considered, for the purpose of this agrearri as
personal property; provided that such wires shall be so placed and maintained by the Municipality that the use
of the same will not Interfere with the opsiation and mainteranca of the Company's equipment or its use of
said poles. and provided further that a thirty (30) Inch ctirnbinfj apar a nhall he maintained between the pole
pins on poles jointly used with another public utility, Ali such police and fire alarm signal wires shall be attached
and maintained under the direction and 6uperv,slon Wit ie Comiaany'm authorized representatives and only rn
compiiance w,th any rules for construction ano maintenance of rrtectnc power and communication fines as
may be ordered by the Illinois Commerce Commission, The Municipality shall, at its own expense, defend all
claims, demands, or suits on account of any injury to lite, limb or property that may rAxutt by reason of or in
connection with the presence, use, maintenance, erection or removal of the Municipality's police and tiro
alarm signal wires that their appurtenances pursuant hereto, and hereby agtaes to sevu euld keep harmless
the Company from any and all damages, judgments, costs and expenses of any kind which may arise by
reason thereof,
SECTION S. OOMP9NSATION FOR USE OF RIONT OF WAY
So long as the Company exercisas and enjoys the rights grantad to A hereunder, it shall pay to the Municipality
fnr AArth Ar"AA I inA that the Company matntains and operates within the Municipality' $0.38 per Access Line
per month for the calendar year 1991, and thereafter retroactive to January 1, 1991. in no event shall the
ptiyfnents for any year be less than Ina amounts the Municipality reoelveo In cash for the calendar year 1991.
The Company shall make said payments on a monthly basis, due the last day of the sumosaing calendar
month, "Access Line" as used In this Section shah mean "the connecting facility between a customer's premise
and the Company's nerving nAntrRI rifCc.a that provides customs( attoss to the dial network for placing and
-4-
FN1'i! M.tl.A.4.
receiving ;,aIle," "Within me Mur+iciNaiity" means within the corporate boundaries of the city, village or
Ircorporefed town named in Section 1 of this Ordinance as recorded with the appropriate county recorder and
as provided to the Company, The Municipality agreea to notify the Company of any ordinances a~tnexing ro or
disconnecting from such corporate bcuhdf lAs and sgroec 10 provide to the Company an accurate map of Bach
changes showing, if available, str+eol name and numoor d tsli,
The Company shall, within forty-five 145) days of the affective date of this Ordnance, make an appropriate
adiusimant hahween paymenls to whioh the Munioipa:lty Is entitled under this Ordinances ani payment that the
Municipality Is entitled tc or has received under a prior Interim Agreement dated
fur the period commencing January 1, 1991.
Tho Company agrees to provide annually, will du a reasonable time arum Muni ;panty's request, zhe names,
addresses and number of Access Lines for each of Its custOmars within the Municipally, subject la the
Municipaity's agreement not to disclose said informatlon, which Municipality agrees shall be used solely
for the purposes of verifying the number of the Company's Aran i Ines within the Munlcipality. The
Company further agrees to substantiate. upon request the contents of such report and all records and other
documents requlrod for such verification shall, upon reatwnal,le ucivdrtce notice, be subiect to inspection
by the Municipality. In compiling such report the company snail be permitted to delete the names of those
customers subscribing to the Company's non -published iisting service.
The payments due hereunder shall be in lieu of any perms, Oconee, Inspection of ether similar fees or charges
customarily assessed by the Municipality to businesses operating in the public way or oosratinq in a similar
business as that conducted by the Company Including, but not limited to, all general business license lass.
I he Company shall, without charge and when directed by the chief executive officer of the Municipality, move
within the same premises the customer premise wire associated with oath Access Line proviriarl to the
Municipality by the Company, provided that not more than one such change of location In any one year p9r
Access, Line shall be made by tho Company without expense to the Munreipality. Customer premise wire" is
defined as any wire begtnning on the customer's side of the network interface or equivalent and ending at ;he
registration jack or connecting block, exclusive of wiring associated with key or PBX systems and their serving
terminals or main distribution frames.
SECTION 7- UNDOGROUND INIITALLATION
Newly consirticted distribution Ones shall be placed underground in the extent required by the illinois
Commerce Commission" The Company shall not be required to bury any existing aerial facilities. However,
if a municipal construction project to the public way, such as a read widening or ower Improvement, woulo
require that exlsdng aerial facilities be relocated, the Company agrees that If requested by the Municipality,
such facilities Will be buried, provided the cost to the Company of burial does not exceed the cost of an
aerial relocation,
if during the term of this Ordinance, the Company shall receive authority from the ICC to undertake a system.
wide program or programs of undergrounding Its existing transmission facilities, the Company will budget
and allocate to tha prnoram of undergrounding In the Municipality such amount ae -my bo dstermined and
approved by the ICC.
-5-
SECTION S. MAINTENANCE OF TREES
The Company ;s authorized and directed to trim trees upon and overhanging the streets, avenues. alleys,
highways and other public pieces or grounds of the Municipality, so as to prevent the branches of such trees
from coming into contact with the wires and cables of she Company. Ali such trimming ahati oe Or, accordance
with standard local aMoricultural practices, If established. Ai! Irimming debris shalt toe removed !nom the Mork
area on a daily basis. The Murilclpai:ty may, if it so eferts, spKify times, methods and standards for the
Company's tree trimming operations.
SECTION S, MOViNG OF 6UILDINOS
The Company after live �5) %Uye written notice Irorn the govsriing body C+ the MunicioaNy to do so, shall
remove, false, or lower Its structures ternperanly to permit the maviOg of a t,>,Ading, or any other object,
along a highway, provided the benefited party or parties shall .agree Is pay i a Company an amount equal
to the actual cost of effecting such temporary changers in its structuraa; and arovideo further that, pending
the determination 0.1 such aetuai 0031, the benefited party or parties snail have deposited with the Company
an amount actual to the cost as estimated by the Company. Should arty amount of ouch deposit remain
unexpended, after deducting the actual cost Involved, said amount shah be returned to the party making
the deposit.
SECTION 10. RIONT TO REPEAL ORDINANCEf VALIDATION
In case the Company shaft tail or neglect to comply with any or all of the provisions of this ordinance funress
by order of the Illinois Commerce Commission or of any other Sody, beard, commission or court of competent
jurisdiction, the Company is otherwise directed. or unlass oompliance by the Company with such provision "s
prohibited or adjudged unlawful by an order or the Illinois Commerce Commission or by an order of any other
body, board, commission or court of competent jurisdiction.), !he Municipality reserves the runt to repeal this
ordinance or rescind this oontract, and forfeit the rights hereby created or sougnl to be created, provided tnat
no such repeal, rescission or forfeiture shall exist or be c;almecl because of such failure or neglect; until
written notice of such failure or neglect to claimed shall have bean given to the Company, and a raasonablo
opportunity afforded it to comply with the provisions hereof or to prove that such compliance already exists.
In the event that the jlllnois Commerce Commission or any othor body, board, :commission or court of
competent jurisdiction shall adjudge any provision or prov+slons hereof invalid or 1116gal, or direct a change
by the Company in any matter or thing herein contained, such invalidity or lVegality or change shall in no way
affect the remaining provisions of this ordinance, or their valiaity or legality v,d this ordinance in ail other
respects shall continue in full force and effect, as If said provision or provisions had not bean so adjudged
invalid or illegal or such change directed.
SECTION 11, AOREESIENT NONEXCLUSIVE
Nothing contained In this Agreement shall prohibit the Munlcipefity from entering Into an agreement with any
other entity similar to the one granted herein to construct, install, maintain and operate in the public way. The
Municipality agrees that It will use Its best efforts to obtain appropriate compensation from any and ail entities
that seek to use the public, way tri provide telecommunication wsrvices similar to the ta4communt0ation
MM
=R11M R. Id.4. r.
0Ii. "Q. 1 "q,, � c; 5' p_ q
services provided by the Company, it being the Intent of the parties that all entitles using the public way
to provide competing sorvicea be treated fairly.
The permission end authnrily herein granted are not intendotl to limit or modify any agreement, franchise,
license or permit previously granted by the MunicipaiYty to any other occupant of the public way. Therefore,
the Company, recognizing the prior ngniS o: other contractors, franchisees, licensees end perrnftses In line
public way, shall exerdse the rights granted herein In suoh a manner as not unreasonably to intmiara with
the prior or future rights of outer mn contractors, franchisees, licensees or permittees In the public and so
as not to endanger or Impair the faci!itise of any other such oontraotor, fronohlse, licensee or pennitets. The
Munlcl*lty covenants that it shall require prior contractors, franchisees, iicensees or permittees, 6n Ilka
manner, to roswot the rights and not 1nteAera with the rignts Of the Company granted herein.
" TION 12. COMPANY DDPINED
whenever the word 'company' or the words "Illinois Bell Telephone Company" are used In this ordinance,
they shall be construed to mean the Illinois Bell Telephone Company, its lessees, rurrtssors and asslgns,
and this ordinance shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Company, ria lessees, successors
and assigns
$ACTION 13. 411YERADILITY
if any provision of this Agreement, or Orly covenant, stipufatlon, Obligation, agreement, act or action. or part
theroof made, assumed, entered into or taken thereunder, or any application of such provision, Is for any
reason held to be illegal or Invalid, such Illegality or invalidity shall not affect any other provision of this
Agreement Or any other covenant, stipulation, obligation, agreement, act or action, or part thereof, mado,
assumed, entered into, or taken, each of which shall be construed and enforced as If such Illegal or Invalid
portion were not comained herein. Such Illegality or Invalidity of any apWcatlon thereof shall not affect arty
legal and valid application thereof, and each such provision, covenant, stipulation, obligation, agreement, act
or action, or part thereof, shall oa deemed to be eftective, operative, made, assumed entered into or taken In
the manner and tc the full extent permitted by taw.
$ACTION 14. NOTICE AND MAILING OF AD011111 PAG11
UnlaFs ethorwlse epselfied herein, all notices, requests, designations, delhiorioc, approvals, coneente,
demands and waivers required or provided hereunder or deslrec by the parties hereto shall be In writing
aria shall be deemed properly served It nand-0eilvered to the parties at the loiiowing addresses (effective
on delivery) or N sent by registered or certilled mail, postage prepaid, return racelpl requested, addressed
10 the parties at the following addresses (effective on mailing);
(1)IFTOXMPANY; Area Manager-Cotamunity Relgtiona
20 North Main Street
Lombard, Illinois 60118
Cf�
(il) IF TO THE MUNICIPAIITY�
or to such other parties at other addresses as either Darty may designate by notice to the other,
SECTION / 6. EFFECTIVE DA"M"IE
This ordinance shall be In fill force upon raceipt by the Cleric of the Murilelpaltty of the Company's written and
unconditional acceptance of all the Provisions of this ordinance executed by Its proper officers :hereunto duty
authorizod, undor tho oorporato Dool of tho Company, and ottostsd to Dy its 6eorstary or Assistant Secretary,
PASSED this
day of . A.D. 19_
APPROVED this — day of , A.D. 19
r rv.. n , 0 , , ,. .
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)SS
COUNTY OF )
- OF _ )
l'
---1 Clerk of the
of ----- of County,
Illinois, do hereby ceritfy that I am the keeper of the ordinances Of said Munlcioality- and that the above
and foregoing is a true, correct and complete copy of Ordinance Number passed by the
_,-, of said Muniglpailty on the __ day of
A.R,1p and approved by the theredOn the
cay Of A.D.1 B as appears from the records of said Municipality.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand as ;isrk of
said Municipality and have hereunto affixed tho Saal thOreof this _ day of
A..D.10 -
OLVIK
AOCIIPTANCE by COMpANfy
Illinoio 801 Tolophone Company, by and through his and
by authority vested in them by_
, do hereby unconditionally accept the foregoing Ordinance for
the purposes contained therein,
ATTEST:
its
Accepted this - �OYOf . _ A,0.19
Illinois Set; Telsohone Company
By:
Ira
-g-
; 9, 9 14 H . 1� , M C,
STATE OF ILLINOIS
SS
COUNTY
3 , , -, . , , �j , . : $ , P . i 2
—1 a Mary public hersWj certify that
personally know. by me io be the --.— Of IM1166 Bell Telephone
Company, and peruonally known by me to be the
of said 00.,"Oany, appeared before me this -- day of
1991 and scKrvM"s that they exoC4419d the foreglAng Aoceptance an oehitif of Illinois
Bell Te)sohone Company as their free and voluntary act and that of the Company,
SM
4 * *E HD* #*
vILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL.-T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: ADELAIDE THULIN, SIGN REVIEW BOARD CHAIRPERSON .
FROM: KENNETH H. FRITZ, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
DATE: APRIL 15, 1992
SUBJECT: SIGN -24-92, CHARLES VAVRUS -
LOCATION: 501 MIDWAY DRIVE
QUEST
The petitioner seeks a text amendment to Section 7.330 and Section 7.701 to create a
special use for off -premise signs.
PLANMNQ AND ZONING COMMEM
This is a proposal for a text amendment by the owner of Charlie Club to amend the text in
order to allow off -premise signs by adding the following language to Section 7.701, Scope
of Appeals, Variations and Special Uses to read as follows:
"A special use may be requested to allow for an electronic message center,
development identification signs, non -conforming wall signs, the equity option,
and for relief from the prohibitions of Section 7.310 relating to advertising
signs."
Mr. Vavrus was cited for violation of the non -conforming section of the Sign Code and his
attorney, Mr. Doig, appeared in his behalf at the circuit court hearing on April 7. The
presiding Circuit Court Judge continued the court proceedings until Monday, May 11, at
10:00 a.m, to allow the Sign Review Board and Village Board to take action on their
request for a text amendment presented in this petition.
The petitioner earlier filed a request for an appeal of the staffs interpretation regarding
Charlie Club's right to have an off -premise sign adjacent to Elmhurst Road on Park
National Bank's property. It was the opinion of the Village's legal counsel, Everette Hill,
that the sign is not eligible for variation or a special use equity option to allow it to be
placed on an improved off -premise property even though they have a sign easement on the
adjacent property where the legal non -conforming sign is presently located. (See attached
legal opinion in memorandum dated 11/11/91.)
A solution for Charlie Club's request to allow an off -premise freestanding sip is a text
amendment to the Ordinance. Such an amendment would modify the language for
advertising signs and create a new section under special uses to create a category for off -
premise signs. Mr. Doig believes that such a Special Use category still allows the Village
to review off -premise signs on a case-by-case basis using the special use standards.
Adelaide Thulin - Page 2
April 15, 1992
SIGN -24-92
However, staff is concerned about amending the Sign Ordinance to create such a Special
Use category. A prohibition for off -premise signs is usually found in sign ordinances of
communities that have recognized signs as an important item to be regulated. To a great
degree this amendment would make the Sign Ordinance more permissive. Further, care
must be taken in amending ordinances when the goal is only to benefit a specific property.
Staff recognizes the unusual circumstances concerning the Charlie Club sign. We have
recommended that ownership contact Zanies at the southwest corner of Elmhurst Road and
Midway Drive. We believe that a reasonable alternative would be for Charlie Club to
install a panel on a relocated Zanies' sign. This could provide them identification on
Elmhurst Road. Staff has received no response on what we believe is the best solution for
this matter.
Accordingly, staff recommends that the proposed amendment to create a Special Use
category for off -premise signs.be denied. We believe that such an amendment adversely
effects the purpose of the Sign Ordinance.
However, staff would support an amendment to the Sign Ordinance that would allow an
off -premise panel on a permitted freestanding sign, such as a Charlie Club panel on the
Zanies' sign. This alternative addresses the immediate need of the Charlie Club, and does
not impact the Sign Ordinance as significantly as provisions for off -premise signs.
KHF:hg
MW 12 '91 0404OPnk-,v4,G1EIN L LEHR CHGO P,4/4
MEMORANDUM
TO: Ken Frit=
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr./Village Attorney
RE: Charlie Club Sign
DATE: November 11, 1991
It is my understanding that the staff has determined that
the existing Charlie Club sign along Elmhurst Road must be
removed because it is located off the premises that it advertises
and is therefore an illegal "advertising sign." The staff has
also determined that the sign is not eligible for either a
variation or equity option relief. The Charlie Club has filed an
appeal of the determination before the Sign Review Board pursuant
to Section 7.701 of the Village Code which allows appeals of all
staff decisions with respect to the interpretation of the sign
ordinance. The Charlie Club is apparently claiming that since
they own an easement on adjacent property where the sign is
located, that the sign is not really "off -premise" and therefore
a smaller version of the current sign should be permitted.
A number of questions arise with respect to the issue. My
comments follow:
1. Is the sign eligible for a variation?
No, it is not. Pursuant to our sign ordinance,
variations may be granted only with respect to "height, area and
minimum distance requirements."
2. Is the sign eligible for equity option consideration?
NOV 12 '91 04:35Pr'-'-4,67EIn i LD* CHW
P. 214
No, it is not. ZVen though the equity option language
is very broad, it is avilable only if the granting will:
1. Reduce the overall area of signs on the
property and building= or
2. Not exceed the maximum permitted sign area
and contain a minimum of one bonus provision
listed in $7.320.
Clearly, the sign will not reduce the overall area of signs
on the property. To the contrary, it will add to it. Further,
it will exceed the maximum permitted sign area as the permitted
sign area for this type of sign is zero. The equity option was
meant to allow modifications to otherwise permitted signs, not to
permit signs where they are not allowed.
3. Does the fact that the sign is to be placed on an
easement on property that is adjacent to the C':ub remove it from
the "off premise" category?
No, it does not. The sign remains "off premise". Off
premise" is determined by the existence of separate lots used for
separate purposes. Separate ownership is not an element of a
definition of "off premise". Therefore, unity of ownership
between the lot on which the facility is located and the lot on
which the sign is located would not remove a sign from the "off
premise" category.
The only case where the separate lots as between the sign
and the facility would not amount to "off premise" advertising
might be in a shopping center where the whole plan is clearly for
joint advertising and joint use of common signs and common
..2_
NOV l2 ' 91 {a4 : a�1 i ARr6 E IN & L" CHW P. 3/4
areas. The Charlie Club situation does not fall within that
category.
It you have further questions, please contact me.
EMH
EMH/kml
//CAC/EMH11-12
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT SIGN REWEW BOARD
May 4, 1"2
CALL TO ORDER.
The meeting of the Sign Review Board (SRB) was called to order by Chairperson Adelaide
Thuhn at 7:29 p.m. Monday, May 4, 1992 at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street,
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Members of the SRB present: Richard Rogers, Thomas Borrelli, Warren Kostak, Hal
Predovich and Chairperson Adelaide Thulin. Also present were Mr. Robert Doig representing
Charlie Club; Donald Anderson, President of Park National Bank; Sue Elliot, Legal Counsel
for Park National Bank; Dennis and Tom Reindl, representing Northwest Electric Supply.
Village staff present was Kenneth Fritz, Economic Development Coordinator.
SIGN -20-22. Northwest Electrical S 30 rth Main Streg
This case was continued from April 6, 1992 meeting for the purpose of checking with our
legal counsel on a question of an extension of time for a non -conforming freestanding sip
at Northwest Electric Supply parking lot adjacent to Wille Street.
Mr. Everette Hill, the Village's legal counsel stated that the Sip Ordinance is silent with
respect to the authority of the Sip Review Board to grant "tensions of time for sip
compliance. He stated, however, in light of extensions of time granted to Firestone Tire and
Convenient Food Store by the Sip Review Board that the matter before the Sip Review
Board with Northwest Electric Supply freestanding sip could be considered. He stated that
his opinion was based upon the proposed redevelopment activity in the immediate area which
includes the Northwest Electric Supply property in downtown Mount Prospect. It was Mr.
Hill's opinion, that the extension not exceed one year and that the sip would either be made
to comply with the Ordinance by lowering the sip or by removing the sip altogether.
In addition to the freestanding sip adjacent to Wille Street, a request was made for a special
use equity option to approve the continued use of a second wall sip adjacent to Main Street
This sip is presently displayed on the east wall of the north warehouse building being a part
of the Northwest Electric Supply business, The petitioner's demonstrated that they are using
256 square feet of wall sip area as compared with the maximum allowed 282 square feet.
�
It was the general feeling of Mr. Predovich that because of the downtown redevelopment
an extension of time be considered for the freestanding sip adjacent to Wille Street. The
question of the starting date for the extension was debated briefly. Consideration was given
to starting the one year extension from January 1, 1992. Others felt that the extension should
be granted from a date nearest the public hearing meeting.
Sip Review Board Minutes
Page 2
A motion was made by Mr. Predovich, seconded by Mr. Kostak to grant an extension for
the 18 foot freestanding sign adjacent to Wine Street until April 30, 1993 on the basis of past
considerations for Firestone Tire Company and Convenient Food Stores wherein extensions
of time were granted due to time for fabrication and economic considerations. The motion
to approve passed, 4 ayes, I nay (Mr. Rogers).
�& 1=0 I
A motion was made by Mr. Predovich, seconded by Mr. Borrelli that a special use equity
option be approved to continue the use of a second wall sign adjacent to Main Street on the
basis that the maximum wall sip area had not been used, and inconsideration that the signage
will very likely be modified with the expansion of the Northwest Electric Supply business or
relocation. Motion passed, 5 ayes, 0 nays.
SIGN -24-92. Charles Yams (Charlie Club). 501 Midny Dri
This case was continued by the Sip Review Board to allow an opportunity for all of the
members to be present to discuss the case fully. It is recognized that this is an unusual
situation and the Sip Review Board's opinion required the full attention of the five members.
The request presented initially on April 20 by Mr. Doig on behalf of the Charlie Club was
to seek a text amendment to Section 7.330 and Section 7.701 to create a special use for off -
premise sips. Mr. Doig restated the request which basically is a request to amend the
ordinance to permit off -premise signs as an amendment to the special use section of the
ordinance 7.330, thereby permitting off -premise sips as a text amendment requiring a special
use. If the text amendment were approved by the Board, then Mr. Doig on behalf of his
client would seek to erect a sip under a special use provision on the sip easement legally
conveyed to Charles Vavrus; at the time of the development of Charlie Club in 1980.
Discussion
Mr. Kostak read from the minutes of April 20 and indicated that it was significant that Mr.
Vavrus owner of Charlie Club owned the parcel of land subsequently purchased by Park
National Bank until 1985. He agreed with Mr. Donald Anderson, President of Park National
Bank, who contended that Mr. Vavrus had the option 'of seeking a change in the Sip
Ordinance that would provide a more permanent solution for the Charlie Club signage
adjacent to Elmhurst Road.
Other members of the Sign Review Board commented upon the request for the text
amendment for a modification to the special use section of the Ordinance to allow off -
premise signs indicating that:
1. An amendment to the text would appear to benefit only a single property owner
instead of providing a potential solution for other existing signage situations
in the community.
Sip Review Board Minutes
Page 3
That to amend the ordinance to provide for a special use for off -premise
signs would open up the opportunity for other off -premise signs to be established
which the Commission felt was not desirable.
Mr. Doig stated that Park National Bank had not cooperated with Charlie Club in this
matter. Mr. Don Anderson, President of Park National Bank, stated that he had made
contact with the manager of the Charlie Club facility prior to the construction of the Park
National Bank indicating that the sign according to the Village Sign Ordinance was non-
conforming and passed a copy of the Sign Ordinance on to the manager. He stated that the
bank had offered to remove the sign which had been substantially wind -damaged from the
location since it was in violation of the Code at no expense to Charlie Club. He also indicated
that they did take under advisement Charlie Club's proposal for a new sign on the sign
easement adjacent to Elmhurst Road, but was rejected by the Bank's Board of Directors.
Motion
A motion was made by Mr. Kostak, seconded by Mr. Rogers, to recommend denial for the
request for a text amendment under Section 7.330 and Section 7.701 to create a special use
for off -premise signs based on the fact that this amendment would result in satisfying only
one private property owner and not have general application in the Village. The motion
passed, 4 ayes, 1 nay (Adelaide Thulin).
Mr. Predovich asked that the record show that he was disappointed that somehow Park
National Bank and Charlie Club ownership could not come to some agreement on a possible
solution for the signage needs between the two businesses. Mrs. Thulin also indicated her
disappointment.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of April 27, 1992 were approved unanimously on a motion by Mr. Rogers,
seconded by Mr. Kostak, 5 ayes, 0 nays.
The Board reviewed with Mr. Fritz the items carried over from the special meeting of April
27, at which time the proposed amendments were discussed with business persons invited
to comment on sections of the Code that they felt needed some revision. There were six
items that the Sip Review Board was not ini general agreement on that were identified.
These were items 14, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 33. (The item numbers correspond to those on the
April 23 memo.) Following discussion, items #22 and 23 were, in the opinion of the Sign
Review Board, not necessary. Items 24, 25 and 33 were generally acceptable pending final
wording. Item 14, dealing with the definition for a Sip Planned Unit Development still,
in the opinion of the Sip Review Board, needed additional discussion after a refinement
in language by staff or legal counsel.
Sip Review Board Minutes
Page 4
A scheduled public hearing to consider the proposed changes to the Sign Ordinance was
discussed. Mr. Fritz indicated that the earliest possible date for a public hearing would be
May 18 and that would depend upon the Mount Prospect Chamber's readiness to present
changes on behalf of the business persons in the community and also to report the findings
of their sip survey among business people in the community.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting adjourned at 9:30 p.m.
Respect submitted,
Kenne-th --- H---,-Tn—iz,"
Economic Development�oO)r inator
ILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSP.A-'T
nANNNG DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KENNETH H. FRIrZ, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COORDINATOR /��
DATE: MAY 14, 1992
SUBJECT: SIGN -2492, TEXT AMENDMENT
The Sign Review Board transmits their recommendation on a proposed amendment to the
Sign Ordinance filed by Charles Vavrus by Attorney Robert Doig. The application was filed
to create a Special Use category to allow off -premise signs.
This application for a text amendment was filed as a result of the sign amortization program
which requires the removal of the existing off -premise sign for Charlie Club at Elmhurst
Road and Midway Drive.
The Sign Review Board considered the request at their meeting of May 4, 1992. At the
meeting, Attorney Robert Doig explained that Charlie Club would like to continue use of
an off -premise sign location for identification of their building at 501 Midway Drive, Mr.
Doig stated that a conforming sign would be installed, but the off -premise location is
important for the facility.
Mr. Doig explained that a solution for Charlie Club is to amend the Sip Ordinance to allow
off -premise signs. The proposed amendment would modify the language for advertising
signs and crate a new section under the Special Use category for off -premise signs. Mr.
Doig believes that the Special Use procedure would allow the Village to review off -premise
signs on a case-by-case basis using the special use standards. Mr. Doig pointed out that a
sip easement exists at this location and that his client feels the Charlie Club has a right to
a sip at this location.
The Sign Review Board recommends by a 4-1 vote that the amendment be denied. The
Sip Review Board believes that the amendment only benefits a specific property and that
provisions for off -premise signs would make the Sign Ordinance more permissive. Off -
premise signs would adversely effect the purpose )f the Sip Ordinance.
KHF:hg
VILLAGE OF ;MOUNT PROSPECT
PIANNING n PARTM%Wr
Mount Prospect, Illinote
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, TV
MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JUNE 4, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-28-SUA2, PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE
LOCATION: 1500 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a Special Use Permit application filed by Payless Shoe Source. The applicants are
requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a satellite antenna which is 6 foot in diameter and
roof -mounted.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of May 28, 1992. At
the meeting, Attorney Mr. Mike Schmidt was present to represent this request. Mr. Schmidt
explained that the antenna was requested so that the Chicago Regional Office could
communicate with the company headquarters in Topeka.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that all the standards for a Special Use Permit for a
satellite antenna have been met except for the proposed screening. Mr. Forsythe suggested
that a condition be added to any approval which required appropriate screening.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the Special Use request with a condition that the
appropriate screening be installed.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEE TI.-ING*07 z:HE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 28 -SU -92
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: May 28, 1992
Payless Shoe Source
1500 South Elmhurst Road
May 12, 1992
The petitioner is requesting a Special Use
Permit under Section 14.210I.C.3 to allow the
installation of aroof-mounted satellite antenna.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced case ZBA-28-SU-92 as being a request for a Special Use
Permit to allow a roof -mounted satellite antenna at the Payless Shoe Source office at 1500
South Elmhurst Road.
Attorney Mike Schmidt introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated he was an
attorney representing the petitioner in this matter. He stated that the company would like
to install a roof antenna at their office at South Elmhurst Road for purposes of
communicating with the national headquarters in Topeka. Mr. Schmidt explained that this
office on South Elmhurst Road is the Chicago Regional Office, and that it is essential that
this regional headquarters have the ability to do tele -conferencing with the national
headquarters out of state. He also noted that staff had pointed out that screening is
required with a satellite antenna, and the attorney asked that this be waived due to the
three to four foot parapet on the building, that would help screen the support materials of
the antenna. Mr. Schmidt stated that the satellite is not near any residential areas and that
the abutting uses are commercial or institutional, and that the screening would not
accomplish much considering these adjoining land uses.
ZBA-28-SU-92
Page 2
Mr. Ray Forsythe then sum!rr',.zd the staff rei)rt and stated that a Special Use Permit is
required to allow the installatid,' a roof - mounted antenna. Mr. Forsythe stated that this
is �imilar to other requests recc. 'ipproved in the Village and he did point out that the
antenna installation would have ;,", meet all Building Code requirements concerning
installation. Mr. Forsythe stated thac lie would need to see a cross-section of the building
and the satellite antenna, to determine if the building parapet could properly screen the
antenna base.
Mr. Cassidy asked if the 28 foot dimension in the staff report is measured from grade and
how tall the building was. Mr. Forsythe stated that the 28 foot overall height is from grade
to the top of the antenna, and that the building height is 22 feet.
Mr. Brettrager asked where the exact location of the antenna on the roof was, and that this
would make some difference as to whether the building parapet could provide screening.
Chairman Basnik stated that the Zoning Board could recommend approval subject to the
petitioner working with staff on adequate screening.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that if the building
parapet could screen the antenna there would be no objections, but that they believed that
the petitioner should work with staff to provide more information on the subject.
Accordingly, Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval
of the Special Use Permit to allow a satellite antenna at 1500 South Elmhurst Road, subject
to a condition that adequate screening be provided. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Cassidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
&'A' Ctftsn45_-
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHARRM
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
MAY 21, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-28-SU-92
APPLICANT:
PAYLESS SHOE SOURCE
ADDRESS:
1500 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
-s0jU'5'5 �
1400
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B4 Planned Unit Development
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
FAX: N/A
P
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is requesting a Special Use Permit under Section 14.2101.C.3 to allow the
installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna.
_. .I RRI 10tXV-41 UW140 t .
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to install a 6 foot diameter satellite
antenna on the roof of the Payless Shoe Source Chicago Store Operations and Real Estate
Corporate Office located at 1500 South Elmhurst Road. The satellite antenna is needed to
link the store to the corporate headquarters. The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance only
permits satellite antennas larger than 40" as Special Uses.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: Payless Shoe Source is located in the May Properties
building next to the Venture Store.
Following is a discussion of the standards for satellite antennas.
1. The antenna is located on the roof of the store to which is an accessory.
2. The proposed 6 foot antenna diameter is less than 1/3 the height of the building. (22
ft. building height x 33% = 7.26 feet.)
3. The overall height of the dish will be approximately 28'-3". The Code allows a
maximum building height of 30 feet.
4. The antenna will be at least 20 feet from all property lines.
5. The antenna will be in scale with the building.
No indication of screening has been submitted by the petitioner. Staff would like the
petitioner to be prepared to discuss the type of screening that will be proposed for this
satellite dish.
QTHU DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
No other comments or concerns have been raised by Village staff.
SUMMARIMCOMMENDAMON
Staff has no objections to the Special Use requested to allow a 6 foot diameter roof -
mounted satellite antenna, with the condition that acceptable screening be installed. Also,
information submitted by the petitioner indicates a "non -penetrating" roof -mount installation.
Any such installation is subject to appropriate building code.
DMC:hg
—P3.3T !Lien hfa!/ to FetCe � � 6' CKRTN LTITN ffTfG.E
T—
\ 7�fsf.9L 7rh75
.E'
j
]j
t Ti}eel Stops ( ..
t3t3 �JtB
sec ,Sheet 5-1?
ki
VENTURE STORE MARKET
ti Iv
i ��.rJ � Ok•` �j k g
qtr toCtr_
C 0Y !0 Ctr.
92
NTRANCES Vi
x e ,
d P
i ` -..
C 23 Rii iJtlf%? o ? fCrtYe€ 'SLtIFJ
TLf# a Q tea` z - a -
cf w
r • + , _ l `*u. C £ r QC. 2 �t t�ttf e L6 +_✓`_. 2 i '� �t r 010.2 H 6 + �iC.2
Cs414 �I� 4 b 'j,c � ffca? 4��E 4rf3 l 63 �410j �4�6� ]
79� t 4+5.x__
741?
Cf 60 t ! d=+j9 ZOE
I � f
' +75.lo
i
sem. �. � �` �• �:
C'+57.4 .i, .,•' ri �}�,� � j i l
tYR f 1 1), ?9 0 Et44.7 Flo 74.7 � N+04.7 I# 4.7
r ss
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLOMM DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
M
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JUNE 4, 1992
SUBJECT- ZBA-31-V-92, DANIEL GERAGHTY
LOCATION: 202 SOUTH SEEGWUN
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variation request filed by Daniel Geraghty. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.1102 to allow a zero foot setback along the side yard to allow the construction
of a patio.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of May 28, 1992. At
the meeting, Mr. Geraghty indicated that the house has no access to the rear yard and
therefore, he wanted to be able to have a patio on the side of his home just off of the side
door. Mr. Geraghty indicated that a fence would be constructed along the side yard to
screen the patio from the neighbors.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated staff had concerns with such a large variation request. He
indicated that other departments recommended that the request be reduced so that drainage
could be maintained in this area. Mr. Forsythe also pointed out that there was ample room
in the rear of the house and perhaps an L-shaped patio could be designed so that there
would be access by the side door, and no variation would be required.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Several members felt that the request
was a convenience to the homeowner and not a hardship. They felt that there was adequate
room in the rear of the house to build a patio. By a vote of 2-4 the Zoning Board
recommends denial of the variance request.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD Oi'APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 31-V-92
Hearing Date: May 28, 1992
PETITIONER:
Daniel Geraghty
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
202 South SeeGwun
PUBLICATION DATE:
May 12, 1992
REQUEST:
The petitioner is requesting a variation to
Section 14.1102 to allow a side yard setback of
zero feet instead of the minimum required
setback of 7.15 feet in order to construct a
concrete patio.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT:
Peter Lannon
OBJECTORSANTERESTED PARTIES:
None
Chairman Basnik introduced the next case ZBA-30-V-92, as being an application filed by
Daniel Geraghty at 202 South SeeGwun, in order to allow a zero foot sideyard setback for
a patio rather than the 7.15 feet required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Geraghty introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained he would
like to construct a patio in the sideyard of his home. He explained that there is no back
door at the house and that there was only a side door, and that this side door dictates the
location of the patio. He explained that a fence would be constructed adjacent to the patio
and that this would screen the area from neighboring properties. Mr. Geraghty made
reference to a recommendation in the staff report that suggested that the patio would be
reduced to provide a better side yard, and that this reduction be accomplished by
constructing an L-shaped patio behind the house. Mr. Geraghty stated that there is a large
tree behind the house and also a central air conditioning unit, and these two conditions
would prohibit him from constructing an L-shaped patio which wrapped around the house.
ZBA-31-V-92
Page 2
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. He
expiai ca that the appacanY ? to construct a 16'x 27' concrete patio on the side
ref the house that would reduce;:, Ared side yard to zero feet. Mr. Forsythe concurred
that there was no rear access from juse and pointed out that the petitioner would like
to construct the patio off of the existing side door. Mr. Forsythe stated that a 20 foot alley
right-of-way adjacent to this property was vacated in 1976, and that this provided additional
land area in the petitioner's side yard, and that it is this area that he is proposing for the
patio installation. Mr. Forsythe stated that the patio is very large and will occupy the entire
side yard and he believed that this would have an adverse impact on the area even with the
proposed 5 foot fence. Mr. Forsythe recommended that the request be denied. He pointed
out that the subject lot is a very large parcel and that a conforming side yard could be
installed and still provide a sufficient patio size for the petitioner.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then discussed the request and Mr. Basnik noted that the
proposed patio is to be on the land area that was vacated by the Village. He stated that the
petitioner is taking unfair advantage of the former public right-of-way.when he is considering
building such a large patio.
Mr. Cassidy asked about any drainage problems in the area and he noted in his staff report
that the Engineering Division recommends a three or five foot open setback so that
drainage patterns are not altered. Mr. Geraghty explained that there are no drainage
problems in this area and that he did not believe such a setback for drainage was necessary.
Mr. Geraghty stated that his proposal was for the patio as he would like to see it
constructed, but that he could compromise, and he pointed out that the property to the
south is at a substantial distance away from the patio and that the nearest structure is the
neighbor's garage.
Mr. Saviano looked at the picture of the petitioner's home, and Mr. Geraghty pointed out
the large tree in the rear yard that would prohibit the L-shaped patio from being
constructed behind the house,
Mrs. Skowron pointed out that side yard variations are more typical on smaller lots, such
as lots with a 50 foot width, and that this is a very barge lot and that she could not, see the
hardship in this request.
Mr. Basnik pointed out that the vacation of the right-of-way creates the opportunity for this
patio installation, and that the petitioner should provide a better setback, so as to not take
advantage of the property that he acquired due to the right-of-way; being, vacated.
ZBAW3i-`
Page 3
Mr. Saviano asked about the interior room layout of the home and Mr. Geraghty pointed
out that the kitchen is at the side door.
Mr. Brettrager asked how far the existing tree was behind the house and Mr. Geraghty
stated the tree is approximately 4 feet from the house. Mr. Brettrager suggested that the
patio could be reduced in width to 12 feet, and that this would provide a 4 foot side yard.
Mr. Saviano asked the staff's' opinion of a 4 foot side yard and Mr. Clements stated that
staff recommends providing a 7.15 foot sideyard to meet the Ordinance requirement.
Mr. Brettrager suggested that the Zoning Board make a motion on his compromise for a
12 font patio width with a 4 foot sideyard. Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning
Board approve a variation to allow a 4 foot sideyard. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Pratt, Brettrager,
NAYS: Cassidy, Skowron, Saviano and Basnik
The members who voted in opposition to the request explained that they believe this is a
very large lot and that there was no apparent hardship necessary to allow a zero foot
sideyard. They believe that the petitioner could install a reasonable sized patio on this
property and that there was concern for a precedent with such a large variation.
Mr. Basnik explained that the Zoning Board is making a recommendation to the Village
Board on this item and that Mr. Geraghty could discuss his position with the Village Board
in an attempt to overturn the recommendation by the Zoning Board. Mr. Basnik explained
that this would be referred to the Village Board meeting of June 16.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID NL CLE�WDIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: MAY 21, IM
CASE NO.: ZBA-31-V-92
APPLICANT: DANIEL GERAGHTY
ADDRESS: 202 SOUTH SEEGWUN
LOCATION MAP:
119 CATHY
1'23 114
125
;z 0 0 0 0 118
127
DRESSER
201 204 = 03 r, in
203 206 30' 205 n 0 a 0 206
W 00 CN
o o o 0' N 0 0 to 0
03 0 Ch w GO0 000 r, r, o 0 00 r, N
ItSURN
301 Vol 0- o n
0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 a 0 0 a
303 w 00 00 CO N
220
307
309
311
313
z
315 QC
317
;0 - C'4 o w tD -v
a 0 o o OW co go
UNCOLH
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 11,740 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 23% (27% proposed)
FAR.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUEEST
The petitioner is requesting a variation from the side yard setback of 7.15 feet to zero feet
tc aw the construction of a concrete patio with the dimensions of 16' x 27'.
Summary of application: The applicant is requesting to construct a 16'x 27' concrete patio
on the side of the existing dwelling which would reduce the side yard setback to zero feet.
The applicant indicated that there is no rear yard access from the home and would like the
patio off of the side door.
Surrounding Properties and Potential Impact: There was a 20 foot right-of-way for an alley
between the subject property and the property to the south which was vacated in 1976. This
vacation has created an additional ten feet on each lot, which provided a large sideyard.
The proposed patio is very large, and is to occupy this entire sideyard. Staff believes this
will have an adverse impact on the neighboring property, even with the proposed 5 foot
fence.
There is currently a swale which runs along the side yard property line to accomplish storm
water run-off. Staff is concerned that, allowing a patio to encroach this swale, storm water
will now go onto the neighbor's property.
DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
Several departments indicated concern with granting a variation up to the property line. A
3 foot or 5 foot open area is recommended so that current drainage patterns are not altered.
SUMMARYIRECOMENDATION
Staff would recommend that this request be denied. The subject property is a large lot, and
there is no need in placing the patio on the lot line. Staff recommends a conforming 7 ft.
sideyard be provided. If a larger patio is necessary, it can be reconfigured into an "L" shape
at the rear of the house.
DMC:hg
eoe.✓,F,e 0.1 ro✓ce T o.is
L ry
t' o,X wlsr
,'C"Ce roSr /i o. o4
r
31
f� O. /S sexrrw
N
0
l7
FENCE -Mns7 /s o.27
SEE- GWUN AVE.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
JUNE 4, 1992
SUBJECT:
ZBA-32-SU-92, T. J. MAXX
LOCATION:
1000 EAST CENTRAL ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a Special Use Permit application filed by T. J. Maxx Company, Inc. The applicants are
requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a satellite antenna which is 6 foot in diameter and
mounted on the wall of the building.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of May 28, 1992. At
the meeting Mr. Richard James of K. W. Renfro, the installer, indicated that the antenna
had been put up without a permit. They were proposing to move the dish from the side of
the building to the rear and also proposing to paint the apparatus to match the building.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that all the standards for a Special Use Permit for a
satellite antenna have been met except for the proposed screening. Mr. Forsythe suggested
that some screening be required so that the dish be screened from the apartment building
to the north.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Most members felt that the wall -
mounted dish could not be adequately screened from view, and for consistency in the
Center, thought a roof -mounted satellite dish was more appropriate. By a vote of 5-1, the
Zoning Board recommends approval of a satellite dish with the condition that it be roof -
mounted and appropriately screened.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REC � � , 7 ° 7 < —�iNG OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING b,)AkD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 32 -SU -92
Hearing Date: May 28, 1992
PETITIONER:
T. J. Maxx
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1000 East Central Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
May 12, 1992
REQUEST:
The petitioner is requesting a Special Use
Permit as required under Section 14.200I.0 to
allow the constructionof a satellite dish which
is ten (10) foot in radius.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next case ZBA-32-SU-92 for the T. J. Maxx Store
at 1000 East Central Road, being a Special Use request to allow a satellite dish.
Mr. Richard James introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that he
is a representative of K W. Renfro Company, the installer of the satellite dish. He
explained that his company had installed the wall -mounted satellite dish at the T. J. Maxx
Store, and that they would be willing to paint the satellite supports the same color as the
building in an effort to minimize the visual impact of the installation.
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe pointed out that a Special Use Permit is required for a satellite dish in a
commercial location and that this antenna had been installed on the west wall of the
building without having the proper approval. He stated that the petitioner is proposing to
relocate the antenna from the west wall to the rear wall, or the north wall, in an attempt
to minimize its impact. Mr. Forsythe stated that Centennial Apartments are located to the
3A -32 -SU -92 M
ge 2
north of the store and that the Wal-Mart Department Store is west of the antenna
installation. Mr. Fo* stated that the satellite installation meets all requirements of the
Zor.:..g Ordinance w, a exception of the screening. Mr. Forsythe stated that the
petitioner is proposin faint the antenna supports in a color to match the building
exterior, but stated thw, r Zoning Ordinance requires that screening be provided. Mr.
Forsythe explained that std did got know how a wall -mounted antenna old be screened
and suggested if there was concern about the screening of the installation, that perhaps the
best thing to dei would be to relocate the wall -mounted antenna to the roof of the store to
provide screening on the roof as had been done with Walgreens and Wal-Mart.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then discussed the request and Mr. Basnik asked why the
antenna is proposed to be removed from the west wall to the north wall. Mr. James
explained that he believed that the north wall is behind the store and that it would be less
visible to shoppers in front of T J. Maxx and Wal-Mart.
Mr. Cassidy stated he believed that the satellite dish should be installed in a manner that's
consistent with other antennas in Mount Prospect Plaza, and that would be a roof -mounted
installation with proper screening. Mr. Jame explained that it was his understanding that
the owner of the property would not allow the antenna to be installed on the roof and that
is why the unit was mounted to the wall.
Mrs. Skowron asked if the existing antenna could be installed on the roof rather than the
wall if approved by the property owner, and Mr. James stated that this antenna could be
roof -mounted.
Mr. Brettrager pointed out that he believed the screening could be adequately provided on
the roof and that the petitioner should work to provide the screening as required by the
Zoning Ordinance.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was believed that Mr.
Cassidy's position of a roof -mounted antenna with proper screening would be consistent with
other recent action at Mount Prospect Plaza and that this was probably the best approach
to; take concerning this antenna proposal.
Accordingly, Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend that the
Village Board approve a Special Use Permit for a -roof-mounted antenna with proper
screening for the T. J. Maxx Store at 1000 East Central. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: Cassidy
ZJ"$ tk -2" SU -92
page 3
When Mr. Cassidy agreed with the concept of relocating the antenna to the roof of the
store, he believed the Zoning Board of Appeals should know the exact location and the type
of screening to be provided.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
A.M. c4mhV45-
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
MAY 21, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-32-SU-92
APPLICANT:
T. J. MARX
ADDRESS:
1000 EAST CENTRAL ROAD
LOCATION MAP: * a N '-P 0 Ci N V 0 0 N V 1 202 1
-n . *1 K'4�
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R. :
0 0 0 0 0
N [YOO-1
110
IF "t)yCE &J"
n u>
Q. - - - - - - 108
a CI '0 0
4-90-07 GEN NHLAL
1010 o x1050
0
>
NT. PROSPECT PLAZA
SHOPPING CENT"
1200-1220
E. CENTRAL 920.
B-3 Business Sales & Service
N/A
N/A
N/A
4
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is requesting a Special Use Permit as required under Section 14.2001.0 to
allow the installation of a wall -mounted satellite antenna.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to install a 6 foot diameter satellite
antenna on the rear wall of the T. J. Maxx Store at 1000 East Central Road (Mount
Prospect Plaza). Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance only permits satellite antennas larger
than 40" diameter by Special Use permit. It should be noted that the antenna is presently
installed on the west wall, and will be relocated to the rear of the building.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: T. J. Maxx is located toward the west end of Mount
Prospect Plaza Shopping Center. A Senior Citizen Apartment Complex, Centennial
Apartments, is located directly to the north of T. J. Maxx. A primary concern is the view
of the satellite antenna by residents of upper floor apartments.
Following is an outline of the requirements for satellite antennas, and how this installation
meets appropriate standards:
1. The antenna will be located on the rear wall of the T. J. Maxx Store to which it is
an accessory.
2. The proposed 6 foot antenna diameter is less than 1/3 the height of the building (20
ft. building height x 33% = 6.6 feet).
3. The overall height of the dish will be approximately 28.5 feet. The Code allows a
maximum building height of 30 feet.
4. The antenna will be at least 20 feet from all property lines.
5. The antenna will be in scale with the building.
The application indicates that the antenna components will be painted with a color to blend
with the building exterior. The requirement of the Zoning Ordinance is that the antenna
be fully screened from view from adjacent properties (from grade level) with materials
which are compatible with the building to which they are accessory. Staff is concerned that
only painting the antenna will not be sufficient screening to the residential areas to the
north. However, screening of a wall -mounted ,antenna appears difficult as such an
installation does not lend itself to screening as a roof -mounted antenna. The Special Use
Permit for the nearby Walgreens and Wal-Mart included a roof -mounted antenna with
proper screening. Staff would like the petitioner to discuss with the Zoning Board of
Appeals this issue so that an adequate screen can be provided.
The other staff members indicated that some sort of screening should be developed.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
Subject to development of acceptable screening, staff would recommend approval of the
request. As stated, a wall -mounted antenna is difficult to screen and neutral paint may be
the best alternative. If there are major concerns about the screening issue, it might be best
to relocate the antenna to the roof, similar to installations at Walgreens and Wal-Mart. If
the antenna cannot be placed on the roof, it's existing location on the west wall might be
better for residents of Centennial Towers.
II I oil. 0 , +2 pr,
� FQn�t nc �rfnoc
1,ri 25'-0'
5CA.Le
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
rw_
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JUNE 4, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-34-V-92, JOHN AND DELIGHT EILERING
LOCATION: 302 SOUTH LANCASTER
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variation request filed by John and Delight Eflering. The applicants are requesting a
variation to Section 14.3016 to allow a 19 foot wide driveway.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of May 28, 1992. At
the meeting, Mr. Eilering indicated that the wider drive was requested to accommodate two
cars off of the street. He also noted that there are other wide driveways in the
neighborhood.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that the proposed driveway will not significantly impact the
front yard lot coverage and that the driveway will allow additional off-street parking.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request noting that there is a parking ban on
streets at night and this was a common request. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning
Board of Appeals recommends approval of the 19 foot driveway.
DMC:hg
EEn THE
-11NUTES OF ,'w",6.;Rvf-," I " -'Nif NO OF
MOUNT PROSPE,"A BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 34-V-92
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: May 28, 1992
John and Delight Eilering
302 South Lancaster
May 12, 1992
The petitioner is seeking a variation from
Section 14.3016 to allow a 19 foot driveway
instead of the maximum allowed 15 foot.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next request being ZBA-34-V-92, an application filed
by John Eilering at 302 South Lancaster, in order to increase the maximum 15 foot driveway
to 19 feet.
Mr. Eilering introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that the
application was filed to allow a 19 foot driveway width. He explained that he has a one -
car garage at his property and that the 19 foot driveway width would allow two cars to be
parked side by side in the driveway and not overhang the sidewalk or be parked in the
street. Mr. Eilering explained that this is a common driveway width in this area and stated,
by his count, there were nine homes in a one -square block area that had a similar driveway
width. Mr. Eilering stated that this is being done in conjunction with a recent major
remodelling of the home, and that this would be the last phase of work with that
remodelling.
Mr. Forsythe summarized the staff request for the Zoning Board and stated that a variation
was filed to increase the maximum 15 foot driveway width to 19 feet, and that this is typical,
ZBA 34-V-92
Page 2
and that many residents like the convenience parking two cars side by side in a
driveway, Mr. Forsythe stated that front yard co, age and overall lot coverage are below
the maximum with this proposal, and that there are other such driveway widths in the
neighborhood, and that this request would not have any impact on adjoining properties.
The Zoning Board of Appeals' brieflydiscussed the request and Mrs. Skowron pointed out
that this is another example of a Mount Prospect resident undertaking major remodelling
to an existing home in order to allow them to remain in the community.
There being no concerns with the driveway width variation, Chairman Basnik asked for a
motion on the request, Mr. Cassidy moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend
approval of a 19 foot driveway width for the property at 302 South' Lancaster. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Brettrager,
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Cassidy, Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILI AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRM
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
MAY 21, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-34-V-92
APPLICANT:
JOHN AND DELIGHT EILERING
ADDRESS: -
302 SOUTH LANCAS'T'ER
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 9,975 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 32% (34% proposed)
F.A.R.: N/A
cIEVEN 201
H
0 0 0 0 0 0 203
20
201 N 0
N 200
/ A"� ,,��yy���
'30 2- �. 4.�.WIii�'�TM
N - - 205 204
214
N
o
a
a
a
a
213 214
20
N
N
216
215 216
MILiURN 217 218
218
300
301 300 301 300
301 300
302
303 302 303
304
._.
305 304 > 305
306
3
307 306 > 307u
33308
Y
74302
309 308 309310
311 N312
PEN
1 4
.-h�A316 0
0
a1:0
N 0 32
N O
D
d
N
O
CD
4a
J'
N O
t0
C
N
O a
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
a
O
a
O
350
rt rf
N
N
N
N
o
0
LINCOLN
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 9,975 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 32% (34% proposed)
F.A.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
REQ EST
Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a variation from Section 14.3016 to increase the maximum
driveway width from 15 feet to 19 feet for a one -car garage in an "R-1" Single family
District.
Summary of application: The applicant is seeking to replace an existing 15 foot driveway
with a 19 foot driveway for a one -car garage. The wider driveway is requested so that two
vehicles can park on the driveway.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The existing lot coverage is 32% and will be increased
to 34% with the wider driveway. Front yard lot coverage is 21% and will be increased to
27%. This is well below the maximum allowed coverage. There is not sufficient room in
the sideyard for an addition to the existing garage. The wider driveway will help parking
and maneuvering for the petitioner.
WIG
No major concerns were expressed by other Village staff. The Engineering and Inspection
Services Department note that the grading shall be maintained so that existing drainage
patterns are not altered.
STS,. MYIRECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends approval of this request. This is a typical request for homes with one -
car garages, and the additional pavement will not alter the character of the neighborhood
as there are other wider driveways in this area.
It7
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILIO�AMANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JUNE 5, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-35-SU-92, ROUSE-RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER, INC.
LOCATION: S.E. CORNER ELMHURST AND EUCLID, (999 N. ELMHURST RD.)
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 3604 to allow the approved
5,000 square foot future restaurant on the P.U.D. site plan to be expanded to approximately
7,540 square feet. This proposal is for a new restaurant building, immediately west of Bell
Federal Savings.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of May 28, 1992. At the
meeting, Mr. Kevin Rielley, Attorney, for the petitioner, gave an overview of the proposed
Hooter's Restaurant. Mr. Rielley indicated that the petitioners are willing to make the
changes requested in the staff report and would resolve all outstanding issues prior to review
by the Village Board.
Mr. Sal Melilli of Hooter's Restaurant indicated that the proposed restaurant is similar in
nature to a Bermigans, or T.G.I. Friday. He described hours of operation and the type of
customers expected at the restaurant. He discussed a typical menu, and provided
background on the company.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that a restaurant is an approved use in this location and
that the proposed enlargement would have no negative impact on the surrounding
properties.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning
Board recommends approval of the P.U.D. amendment to allow a 7,540 square foot
restaurant with the following conditions:
1. Landscaping plans shall be redesigned to meet the requirements of the
Landscape Ordinance. There are deficiencies in foundation plantings and
parking lot landscaping.
2. The design of the proposed building shall be discussed, with emphasis on the
rear elevation and the loading area.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
June 5, 1992
3. Proposed signage shall meet provisions of the Sign Ordinance, and the
Randhurst Sign Planned Unit Development.
4. Any outstanding issues and concerns of the Engineering, Public Works,
Inspection Services and Fire Departments shall be resolved prior to the
issuance of any building permits.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSP!= ---.G BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 35 -SU -92 Hearing Date: May 28, 1992
PETITIONER: Rause-Randhurst Shopping Center
SUBJECT PROPERTY: S.E.C. Elmhurst and Euclid
PUBLICATION DATE: May 12, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioners are requesting to amend the
Planned Unit Development Ordinance No.
3604 as adopted on February 4, 1986 to allow
the approved 5,000 square foot future restaurant
to be expanded to approximately 7,540 square
feet.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
OBJECTORSANTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next agenda item being a request to amend the
Planned Unit Ordinance for Randhurst Shopping Center which previously allowed a 5,000
square foot restaurant on the P.U.D. site plan to be expanded, to permit a 7,500 square foot
restaurant.
Attorney Kevin Rielley introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals stating he was
with the firm of Rudnick & Wolfe at 203 North LaSalle Street and explained he is the
attorney for Rouse-Randhurst. Mr. Rielley indicated that in 1986 the Planned Unit
Development for Randhurst Shopping Center was established, and this included a footprint
of a 5,000 square foot restaurant west of Bell Federal Savings. Mr. Rielley explained that,
at this time, Rouse-Randhurst has a specific user identified and that this specific restaurant
requires a footprint of 7,500 square feet. Mr. Rielley explained that this consists of 6,000
square feet in the building and 1,500 square feet in a covered patio area.
Mr. Rielley stated that the proposed restaurant is a Hooter's and that this is a restaurant
that provides an emphasis on food and only 25% of their revenues are provided from liquor
sales. He explained that the restaurant will be requesting a liquor license at the appropriate
time, but that this would only be a beer and wine license and not a full service liquor
license. Mr. Rielley stated that during the week he would expect that the Hootees
customers would be more families, and at weekends the patrons of the restaurant would
ZBA 35 -SU -92
Page „2
be younger professionals. Mr. Rielley stated that the larger restaurant would have no
adverse impact on surrounding properties and that this would be an improvement to
Randhurst to upgrade the Center by including a full service restaurant; something that is
presently lacking at the property,
Mr. Rielley concluded by stating that Hooter's would provide employment opportunities for
the community and additional tax revenues to help the Village. He briefly made reference
to comments in the staff report concerning the landscape plan and the rear building
elevation, and stated that Rouse-Randhurst agreed to work with staff on these items and
that he would submit a revised plan to the Village Board if the Zoning Board chose to
make a recommendation on the request this evening. Mr. Rielley also introduced Mr. Scott
Ball, the Manager of Randhurst Shopping Center and Mr, Sal Melilli, Director of
Operations for Hooter's, in case there were questions.
Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and
concurred with the attorney's statements that the original Randhurst P.U.D. provided for
a future 5,000 square foot restaurant at this location. Mr. Forsythe explained that the
amendment for the P.U.D. was necessary to increase this restaurant size to 7,500 square
feet. He explained that required parking is provided for the restaurant and that all
appropriate setbacks are met. Mr. Forsythe stated that information provided by the
petitioner indicates that Hooter's is a full service restaurant offering a menu of sandwiches,
salads and similar light meals, and that the restaurant will be requesting a beer and wine
license. Mr. Forsythe then described the hours of operation for the restaurant, and pointed
out that the staff feels that a restaurant at this location would have no adverse impact on
surrounding properties.
Mr. Forsythe then noted that staff was concerned about the lack of detail on the rear
elevation of the building facing the shopping center, and that staff would recommend that
the rear elevation be designed to provide a more attractive building facade facing the
shopping center. He also stated staff had concerns with the landscape plan and the concrete
block wall at the delivery area. Mr. Forsythe also pointed out that the restaurant would
have a positive economic impact on the Village and complement the larger retail center of
Randhurst, and that staff recommends approval of the expanded restaurant at Randhurst
subject to the four conditions in the staff report about landscaping, the rear elevation,
signage details, and other issues to be determined by Village Departments.
Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Rielley if all lease approvals had been completed for this
restaurant, and Mr. Rielley stated that Hooter's is committed and ready to go and is only
awaiting the final P.U.D. approval by the Village Board.
Mr. Cassidy asked why the company is proposing to build a new restaurant when there is
an existing restaurant just west of the proposed location that has been vacant for two years.
Mr. Rielley indicated that Hootees had considered occupancy, of the former Florenz
Restaurant, but that this building was too small for their needs and that more importantly,
Hooter's builds a prototype building that provides a specific architectural identity for the
restaurant.
ZBA-35-SU-92
Mr. Sal Melilli introduced himself as Director of Operations for Hooter's Restaurants and
described the restaurant in greater detail. He talked about typical menu items, hours of
operation, and the types of customers the restaurant attempts to attract. He explained that
Hooter's has been in operation for ten years. The company started originally in Florida and
that presently there are 75 Hooter's Restaurants across the United States. He compared
the proposed restaurant to Bennigan's, Chile's, or T.G.I. Fridays, but stated that what sets
them apart from their competitors is their ability to identify the type of community that they
will be successful in, and that they do participate in a variety of community events.
Mr. Cassidy asked what was unique about the Hooter's Restaurant and Mr. Melilli stated
that the restaurant features 50's and 60's music that is attractive to'baby-boomers", and that
a "kid's" menu is available for younger children. He also stated that he believes it is a
feature that the restaurant does not serve hard liquor.
Mr. Saviano stated that from the description provided by the petitioner, the restaurant
sounds like other chain restaurants that are found in Arlington Heights and Schaumburg,
and that Mount Prospect could benefit from having this type of facility at Randburst
Shopping Center.
Mr. Basnik asked if there had ever been a Hooter's Restaurant that had been closed and
Mr. Melilli stated that no restaurant had yet been closed by the company.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was determined that
the proposed theme restaurant would provide tax revenues and food and beverage tax to
the municipality and offer dining alternatives and entertainment to families and young
persons in the Village.
There being no further questions, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of an amendment
to the Randhurst P.U.D. to allow a 7,500 square foot restaurant rather than a 5,000 square
foot restaurant subject to the petitioner working with staff on the four conditions identified
in the staff report. The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron, Saviano, Cassidy and Basnik
NAYS: None
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
44 CIhVn--$T-
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENW, IRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
MAY 21, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-35-SU-92
APPLICANT.
ROUSE-RANDHURST SHOPPING CENTER, INC.
ADDRESS:
S.E. CORNER ELMHURST AND EUCLID
LOCATION MAP:
RANOHUPS T'
II
SHOPPING
CENTER
T-V,-r(kP-f, TeS-MvP4T
L
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Planned Unit Development
LOT SIZE- N/A
% COVERAGE. N/A
F-ALIL: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The applicant is seeking an amendment to the Planned Unit Development Ordinance No.
3604 as adopted on February 4, 1986 to allow the approved 5,000 square foot future
restaurant to be expanded to approximately 7,540 square feet.
' ..�.::. N _. • � _. slim :..ry r . ;. .
Summary of application: The applicant is seeking a modification to the Randhurst Shopping
Center Planned Unit Development in order to expand the previously approved restaurant
pad at the southwest corner of the site from 5,000 square feet to 7,540 square feet. The
proposed restaurant will be developed as a Hooter's Restaurant. Hooters is a full-service
restaurant offering a full menu of sandwiches, salads, and similar light meals. Hooters will
also be requesting a liquor license to sell beer and wine only at the restaurant. Hooters
emphasis is on food with approximately 65% of its revenues being generated by food sales,
approximately 25% from beer and wine sales, and approximately 10% from the sale of T-
shirts and other souvenirs. The hours of the restaurant will be 11:30 A.M. - 12:00 A.M.,
Monday through Thursday; 11:30 A.M. to 1:00 A.M., Friday and Saturday; and 12 noon to
10:00 P.M. on Sunday. Enclosed with this staff report is a copy of the menu.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The restaurant will be located at the southwest corner
of the Randhurst property, situated between the Randhurst water tower and Bell Federal.
Access to the restaurant will be from the interior ring road. There is business and retail
zoning and land uses on all sides of the proposed site. Staff feels that a restaurant of this
size will have no major impact on the surrounding areas.
Landscaping: The petitioners have submitted landscape plan for review. The following
items shall be added to the landscape plan: 1. A title block; 2. Utilities; 3. Proposed
lighting; 4. Proposed berms; 5. Signage location and detail; 6. Refuse disposal locations and
detail; 7. Irrigation plan; 8. Additional plantings along the foundation.
Site Plans and Elevations: The petitioners are seeking to expand the previously approved
"future restaurant" on the Planned Unit Development. Because there is a tenant for the
space, a sample elevation has been submitted. Because the petitioners are proposing a
larger building than that previously approved, a more detailed submittal has been included
for information of the Zoning Board.
The site plan indicates a single story building and covered deck totalling 7,540 square feet.
The plan also indicates a parking lot with 62 parking spaces.
The elevations that have been submitted indicate that the front of the building will face
Kensington Road. Staff is concerned with the lack of amenities on the rear wall facing the
mall. Staff would recommend that the rear elevation be redesigned to match the front
elevation without the railing. The elevations indicate the building to be constructed of
vertical wood siding and a metal roof. There will be a covered deck with fencing along the
front and left sides. Staff would note that the site plan and the elevations do not match in
the location of the covered deck. Also, the plans indicate a concrete block wall to screen
the delivery area. Because this area is visual to the drive-through of Bell Federal, staff
would suggest that brick be used instead.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The pet be prepared to discuss the exact location of the deck on the proposed
building. Staff would like the petitioners to bring a colored rendering or photos of any
similar Hooters Restaurants, if possible to the public hearing.
Economic Impact: The proposed restaurant will provide a positive economic impact
complementing the larger retail center, Randhurst. The proposed hours of operation will
extend the business activity at Randhurst and serve a clientele in the growing area of theme
restaurants. This will complement the proposed family restaurant planned for the Kroch's
and Brentano's space at the shopping center. There will be a positive impact on job
creation and sales tax revenues, in addition to assessed value to the Village of Mount
Prospect.
MER DEPARDIENTAL CQMMNTS
1. Inspection Services: Grading plan shall be submitted along with development plans.
There are several water mains in the area of the existing water tower. It appears the
new parking lot will be over some of the water mains. Will the mains be relocated?
2. En4ngving: Amendment to PUD should require detention for this site based on
our current ordinance.
3. Publk-Works: On landscape plan there appears to be a potential conflict with
existing water control vaults, and valves adjacent to existing water tower. Otherwise,
Public Works has no objections.
4. Fire Depart menl: Fire lanes must be dedicated and signed - hydrants on engineering
plans.
SUMMARXIRECOMAENDATION
Staff recommends approval of the expanded restaurant on the Rouse Randhurst property
as indicated on the site plan. There are several outstanding issues that should be considered
when reviewing the subject plans:
1. Landscaping plans shall be redesigned to meet the requirements of the Landscape
Ordinance. There are deficiencies in foundation plantings and parking lot
landscaping.
2. The design of the proposed building shall be discussed, with emphasis on the rear
elevation and the loading area.,
3. Proposed signage shall meet provisions of the Sign Ordinance and the Randhurst
Sip Planned Unit Development. ,
4. Any outstanding issues and concerns of the Engineering, Public Works, Inspection
Services and Fire Departments shall be resolved prior to the issuance of any building
permits.
DC:hg
FOOD COOKED
TO ORDER
A AVAILABLE TO GOI
LOOK DEEPLY INTO
MY EYES AND
CONSIDER THIS
NEW ENGLAND STYLE CLAM CHOWDERiy._..._..........._.....
HOOTERS GUMBO OR CH�1_ __...._... ._.._._........_._...._.._....
HOOTER SHOOTER (oyster _ ..... _ .._ .... _.,. _
tHOOTER SALAD._._..__...._........_. _ ._......_ ........._..._.._............
OYSTERS
FRIED — nd hero, but it you InAst._.......... ........ _•-•--.--•_---.._._........
_.
STEIN® for monied it you prelio A ROASTERFUL ____ K A ROASTERFU.
NUDE(ornwmehe ONTWHASFSHMI.00ZM 1.4 DOZEN -
SAMPLER PUTTER EXPENSIVF BUT WORTH IT.. ---
A LITTLE BTT OF THIS ANDA LITTLE Off OF THAT, SOME STEAMED SHRIMP AND
SOME BOXED CRAB LEGS THAT RADNT MAKE YOU FAL IT"S SEAF000 SALAD
AND SOME FAMOUS V N GS ITS A LITTLE BIT OF EVERYTHING SO ORDER OAF
NOW AND GAGE IT A TRY. YOU CAN TRUST IAS WE NEVER LE.
STEAMED to.
With Coddal Sauce Or Orawt► BMW Saline (BY OUR SCALE)
SH RW SERVED HOT J READY TO PEEL
FTEID TESTED W RURAL IOWA — SO YOU KNOW INEYRE GOOD.
SEAFOOD SA .A[)- - ------------------._.__..7 OZ.
A CONGLOMERATE OF SHRIMP AND CRABMEAT THAT, WHEN WATER
IS ADDED, DOUBLES AS A HIGH QUALITY CONCRETE AND STUCCO
PATCHING MATERIAL. (—.=T KIDDW A HOOTERS' 61)
GROUPER'S COUSIN SANDWICH.--_.__.__._.,
Served with Cale Siow, Pickle Lettuce. Tomato and Tarter Sauce}
'WE FMAID A COUSIN OF THE GROUTER AND DECIDED fT WAS BETTER THAN
PLAIN OLD QROUPM BECAUSE iT HUNG OUT AT THE FINEST SCHOOLS'
CRAB ._......
__..___._.__._..__._
23 OUNCES OF JU MBO CRAB LEGS Saved with Drawn Butler Sauce.
THESE BABIES ARE REALLY GOOD,
STEAMED CLAM — HOOTERS STYLE —
Saved with Drawn Buhr Sauce. _
MADE SEMI -FAMOUS RIGHT HERE AT HOOTERS ._._._.__._.._....._.._........_._
Ar
* N00TERS NEARLY VOORLD FAMOUS
CHICHEN WINGS 0F7rNLWTATED
# (SERVED.MILD. MEDIUM, HOT HARDLY E6 A DUPLICATED
* OR 3 MILE ISLAND) THE HOT ONES 10 Pts.._..., _..._. .
* WILL DEFINITELY 20 PCs...... ...........
k GET YOUR ATTENTION 5D Pts....,..., ............_
* x 01 ORO NET CHICKEN WING DINNER _... _ .............. .__...............
# 20 MNGS A A BOTTLE OFDOA4PERAGNUN
* A MEAL OR A SNACKM
Dekato wip" vow Blue am"*
* Eats Skso Cho"* t EX"
THE ULTIMATE HIM & CHEESE SANDVACH .
THE PIGGY CAME FROM A MARKET, THE CHEESE CAME FROM A COW.
WE ADDED SOME SECRET SAUCE AND THEY'RE ON A ROLL NOW.
CHICKEN SAAR}WiCH, _.__._._.._....,� � __
AFTER THE WINGS WERE GONE WHAT ELSE COULD WE DO BUT
SAYE THE BREAST. Bar-B-Oue Sauce on Request
HOOTERS (MORE THAN A MOUTHFUL)BURGER __-_.
IT HELPS K YOU LET LS KNOW WHAT YOU WANT ON fr... L
Mayo or Bar -B -OU Ww► Baca) —_ _ __ __ _..,-,_.— —
PHILLY CHEESE STEAK_______.__.
A FMADWE AMONG THE 76ERS, FLYER$ Pf*1K.% EAGLF•31 AAKj ;f
EVEN THEL16ERTYBaL THAXY&JCED STEAK COVERED (NTH
MUSHROOM$ PEPPERS t CHEESE
HOOTER SALAD
OUR ORJCJML SALAD WrTH ADDED HAM. CHEESE. BACON AND ECOS —
A DEUGHTRX EXPERIENCE THAT ANY RABBIT WOC" ENJOY.
GOURMET HOT DOG PLATTER
A UN/OUE LfTTLEE ITEM... Wlt► CW AdCL__._._.__
CURLEY II�:Te FRIES .._ _.._._—___.__Ic.... LARGE
FRENCH FRIES ARE FUM AGAIN PEELED AND CURLED ENTIRELY BY ITER A
PROGRAA0AED BY AN IDAHO REftAGEE V440M WE HAVE CHANED TO THE WALL W
THE BACK ROOM — TOWS ON REMEST --- PLEASE 00 NOT FEED THE OWFLOYEES
COLE SLAW, BEANS OR POTATO SALAD_
BEFORE; DURING. OR AFTER YOUR FEEDING FRENZY
WASH fr DOWN WITH ONE OF THESE BEVERAGES
GO AHEAD. BE DARINR YOUR MOACS NOT WATCHING
COKE, SPRITE, DIET COKE, ORANGE, MILK OR ICED TEA
The Obp
goryt STEAD SANDWICH 6 oz. Choice RibeYB-YOUR VERY OWW HOOTERS CUP REGULAR.- BO....
..... FOJUM
"WE THINK YOU'LL LIKE IT — BUT THEN... WE THINK THAT THE CHICAGO (SOON TO BE A COLLECTOR'S REM AROUND THE WORLOi...................... ....... _... EXTRA
BEARS ARE SECRETLY ROVING BAND OF FUR T RADERTC,,
.. n ..
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMEIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JUNE 5, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-26-A-92, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. The amendment pertains to all residential
districts, off-street parking requirements, home occupation provisions and the definition of
a garage. The amendment proposes to allow commercial vehicles in residential areas
provided they are parked in a standard residential garage.
Dave Clements, Planning Director, indicated that the request was initiated by a resident,
Steve Schwartz, because of his commercial vehicle. Mr. Schwartz has a commercial vehicle
with a weight in excess of the maximum 8,000 pounds. Mr. Schwartz believes with a few
minor alterations to his garage, he can park his vehicle in the garage. Therefore, Mr.
Schwartz is suggesting an amendment which would allow vehicles of an unspecified weight
to park in residential garages.
Mr. Clements indicated that by allowing only the standard size garage the larger vehicles
would not be allowed. He felt that smaller vehicles which weighed in excess of 8,00 pounds
are not obtrusive to neighbors if parked in the garage.
The Zoning Board members generally discussed the proposed changes. A majority of the
members felt that the request was a good idea and may solve some existing problems in the
Village. The amendment is appropriate, because the 12 foot garage height would regulate
the size of truck that could be parked.
Accordingly, by a 5-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
amendment for commercial vehicles in residential areas, subject to the vehicles being parked
in a typical size residential garage.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 26-A-92 Hearing Date: May 28,' 1942
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY: N/A
PUBLICATION DATE: May 12, 1992
REQUEST: Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance which will
include the deletion of the following Sections:
14.1001.B.4; 14.1101.B.4; 14.1201.8.4;
14.1301.B.3; 14.1401.B.4; and 14.1501.B.4. Also,
an amendment to Section 143009, Parking of
Vehicles in Residential Districts, Section
14.2602, Rules and Definitions, and Section
14.116.1. all to provide standards to allow the
parking of commercial vehicles in residential
garages.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next agenda item being a request for a text
amendment filed by the Village of Mount Prospect to provide standards to allow the parking
of commercial vehicles in residential garages.
Director of Planning, David Clements summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of
Appeals. Mr. Clements explained that while the application was filed by the Village, it was
done so on behalf of Steve Schwartz of 1216 Crabtree Lane. Mr. Schwartz operates Bel
Aire Plumbing from his home and the Village received a complaint concerning truck parking
at his residence. Staff advised Mr. Schwartz that the truck exceeded the limitations of the
Zoning Ordinance and Mr. Schwartz addressed the Village Board on this truck parking
matter. Mr. Schwartz suggested that truck parking be allowed if the truck could be parked
in a garage regardless of the size of the truck Mr. Schwartz suggested an amendment to
the Zoning Ordinance, and the Village Board directed Mr. Schwartz to process that
amendment through the staff.
Mr. Clements then summarized the existing zoning regulations pertaining to truck parking.
He stated that each residential zoning district prohibits trucks more than 8,000 lbs. and
ZBA-26-A-92
Page 2
trucks of less >. cu�au� warke gages. He also stated that truck parking
;,
provisions are found in the off-street requirements, the Home Occupation
Provisions, and the definition of a private garage. Mr. Clements further stated that Mount
Pros; 2:t Zoning Ordinance generally allows commercial vehicles of 8,000 lbs. to be parked
;n r .wbe, >,+u, �-nmmercial vehicles of more than 8,000 lbs. are prohibited from being
parked in a resider-,' ea.
Mr. Clements conte.-., nd stated that Mr. Schwartz has asked that the Zoning Board of
Appeals consider an ._. ,,,,.,dment to the Zoning Ordinance that would allow commercial
truck parking in a typical residential' garage without a limitation on size or capacity of the
vehicle. He stated that Mr. Schwartz has determined that he could modify his garage to stay
within the 12 foot height limitation so that he could park his truck with a capacity of more
than 8,000 lbs,
Mr. Clements then summarized a survey that the staff did of other municipalities concerning
truck parking., Mr. Clements stated that most municipalities regulate commercial vehicles
by weight or by location, and that as a general rule, commercial vehicles are regulated by
parking in garages, but that some communities do not allow trucks of more than 8,000 lbs.
to be parked in residential areas. Mr. Clements stated that he believed that the proposed
amendment is to some extent self-regulating, in that a typical residential garage with a 12
foot height would not allow an extremely large truck, and that this may be the best way to
consider the amendment. However, Mr. Clements stated that there would be occasions
where trucks are not parked in a garage and that he expected complaints would be received
if an owner does not put his truck in a garage, or if the owner should park the truck in a
driveway at different times during the day.
The Zoning Board then discussed the request and Mr. Basnik stated that he has difficulty
with the Village enforcing items on a complaint basis and that this matter originally came
about from a complaint being filed against Mr. Schwartz. Mr. Saviano complimented Mr.
Schwartz on working through the Village Board on this matter and asked if there would be
storage of materials in the; garage along with the truck. Mr. Schwartz stated that , if
commercial trucks are parked in garages that would eliminate any'potential for storage of
materials and supplies, and that the goal would be to try to keep the -truck parked in a
garage and out of sight. Mr. Schwartz agreed with the Chairman and stated that
enforcement of the Ordinance on a complaint basis is not consistent and not fair to other
persons in the community who may be subject to enforcement of the same violation.
Mr. Basnik stated that this is proposed amendment to the Zoning, Ordinance and that this
would affect the entire Village. He believed that it was not appropriate to amend the
Zoning Ordinance to solve the problem of one homeowner;
Mrs. Skowron stated she believed the proposed amendment was a reasonable idea and that
it recognizes the current conditions in the community, and Mr. Brettrager stated he supports
the request and noted that he agreed that a typical 12 foot high garage would regulate the
size of a vehicle that could be parked inside.
Mr. Cassidy asked if there would be any upper limit by weight of trucks, and stated he aid
not want to see any variations for larger garages.
ZBA-26-A-92
Page 3
�- - - _:_,_:<.,a Mated he believed it's reasonable to control truck parking by garv,:. sizci-add
Mrs. Skowron concurred.
Mr. Basnik asked why Mr. Schwartz could not park his vehicle at a remote location instead
of at his home, and stated he is aware of other contractors that park their vehicles in
commercial areas and not in residential areas. Mr. Schwartz stated that he is not a
commercial contractor and that his large truck carries a substantial amount of inventory
similar to a hardware store. He believed that if he parked the truck in a commercial area
that it would be subject to theft or vandalism. He stated that his operation as a plumber
is much different than a plumbing contractor doing work at a construction site.
Mr. Basnik stated that he did not see a hardship in this request and believed that the
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance was not the best approach to take. Mr. Basnik stated
that changing the Ordinance to solve one person's problem is inappropriate and that it's
important that residents get along with their neighbors to eliminate difficult situations such
as this.
Mr. Cassidy again stated that he would prefer to see an upper weight limit for truck parking
in garages, and Mr. Brettrager indicated that this was not necessary because the garage size
would regulate the ultimate size of a truck.
Mr. Basnik stated that he believed that this was partly a problem of the Home Occupation
Ordinance, and Mr. Clements pointed out that this is a truck parking problem and not
necessarily a home occupation problem, and that the truck parking standards had been in
the Zoning Ordinance for many years.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was determined that
the best feature of the amendment was that the size of a typical residential garage would
regulate the type of truck that could be parked in a single-family neighborhood.
Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mrs. Skowron moved that
the Village Board amend the Zoning Ordinance as necessary to provide standards to allow
the parking of commercial vehicles in residential garages. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Saviano
NAYS: Chairman Basnik
Chairman Basnik voted in opposition to the motion and stated he did not believe it was
appropriate to amend the Zoning Ordinance in this particular case.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
L. M. N&Lhn
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARMNT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE:
MAY 21, 1992
SUBJECT-
ZBA-26-A-92, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REQUEST
This application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance was filed by the Village of
Mount Prospect. The application was filed to amend appropriate sections of the Zoning
Ordinance as it pertains to the parking of trucks and commercial vehicles in residential
zoning districts.
PLAM9NG AND ZONING COMMENTS. AND!CON
C
URNS
Summary of application: While this application was filed by the Village, it was done so on
the behalf of Mr. Steve Schwartz of 1216 Crabtree Lane. Mr. Schwartz operates Bel -Air
Plumbing from his home, and the Village received a complaint concerning truck parking at
the residence. Staff advised Mr. Schwartz that the truck exceeded the limitations of the
Zoning Ordinance, and Mr. Schwartz addressed the Village Board on this matter. Mr.
Schwartz suggested that truck parking should be allowed if the truck could be parked in a
garage, regardless of the size of the truck. Mr. Schwartz suggested an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance, and the Board directed Mr. Schwartz to process an amendment, to
obtain input from the Zoning Board of Appeals.
However, Mr. Schwartz objected to the $500.00 filing fee for an amendment. The Manager
and Mayor directed staff to initiate the amendment so Mr. Schwartz would not have to pay
the filing fee.
Existing Zgning Requirements:
The Zoning Ordinance includes the following provisions:
1. Excluded from all six residential distdcts:
'le housing of trucks, commercial vehicles or trailers with license plates
indicating a gross weight or licensed weight less than eight thousand (8,000)
pounds shall be allowed in garages. Personal use vehicles, such as, pickups
and vans are not subject to this restriction."
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
2. Off-,ctmet Parking R Quirements:
"No truck, commercial vehicle with license plates indicating a gross weight or
ased weight in excess of eight thousand one (8,001) pounds, or trailers.
'�e Parke' or stored on any residential premises except when making
rendering a service at such premises. Personal use vehicles such as
pwi.ups and vans, are not subject to this restriction."
"Any contracting or service business truck used as part of a home occupation
shall be permitted up to a licensed weight of eight thousand (8,000) pounds,
but shall be parked in a garage. No garage shall exceed the accessory building
standards of Section 14.102.B of this Chapter 14. Trucks with a licensed
weight of more than eight thousand one (8,001) pounds are prohibited from
being parked at the residence."
"A private garage is an accessory building, or an accessory portion of the
principal building, which is intended and used to store motor vehicles. Such
a garage may be used for the storage of motor vehicles designed to carry not
more than ten (10) passengers and not more than one pickup truck having a
load capacity of one and one-half (1:�) tons or less."
As a summary of these existing provisions, regulations on truck parking are found in a
number of sections of the Zoning Ordinance. The ordinance generally allows commercial
vehicles of less than 8,000 pounds to be parked in a garage. Commercial vehicles of more
than 8,000 pounds are prohibited from being parked in a residential zoning district.
Mr. Schwartz has asked that the Zoning Board of Appeals consider an amendment to the
Zoning Ordinance that would allow commercial truck parking in a typical residential garage,
without a limitation on size or capacity of the vehicle. Mr. Schwartz has determined that
he can modify his garage to stay within the 12 foot height limitation so he can park his truck
with a capacity of more than 8,000 pounds.
As to the form of the amendment, staff believes the wording on excluding commercial trucks
from all residential districts should be deleted. There is no need to list the exclusion in
each district. Regulations on truck parking in residential areas should remain in the off-
street parking provisions and the Home Occupation regulations. Suggested wording to
implement Mr. Schwartz" proposal is as follows:
1. Any contracting or service business truck used as part of a home occupation shall be
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
permitted, but such vehicle shall be pa �7:. ;.":age. No garage shall exceed the
accessory building standards of Section i4.IW.8 of this Chapter 14.
The parking of trucks, commercial vehicles or commercial trailers shall be permitted
in residential zoning districts, but such vehicle shall be parked in a ,garage. No
garage shall exceed the accessory building standards of Section 14.102.8.
GARAGE, A private garage is an accessory building, or an accessory
PRIVATE portion of the principal building, which is intended and used to
store motor vehicles.
In evaluating this request, staff believed that it was important to review truck parking
regulations in other communities. That information is as follows:
1. Arlingtoll -eig , Purpose of requirements is to restrict parking in residential areas
to private passenger vehicles. However, "vehicles such as pick-up trucks or panel
trucks may qualify as private passenger vehicles only when used exclusively as
passenger vehicles or for hauling property of the owner. Vehicles with the
identification of the owner or operator affixed by name or logo shall qualify as a
private passenger vehicle provided such identification is no larger than 25% of the
area of the front door....:'
2. Prospect Heights, "Vans, trucks and commercial vehicles over 8,000 pounds and up
to 12,000 pounds may be parked in the open on the front driveway or in the
buildable area behind the front building line or in the rear yard...." However only
one truck is allowed, it must be five feet from a lot line, and screened by landscaping.
3. ,gf, g,, "no more than one truck of not more than 8,000 pounds...:'
4. D&LEjajUjL Commercial truck parking in residential districts is prohibited.
5. Highlgpd_Park, No more than one commercial vehicle of not more than three (3)
tons capacity which are the property of and for the private use of the occupants of
the parcel may be located in a private garage.
6. Skokie. No more than 1/3 of the vehicles stored in a private garage may be
commercial vehicles and provided that they do not exceed 6,000 lbs. empty weight.
(A maximum of a three -car garage is allowed.)
7. Wilmette. No more than one vehicle in excess of 11/2 tons capacity may be stored
in a private garage.
Gil Basnik, Chair n
Mount Prospect 4--ing Board of Appeals Page 4
8. Schaumburg, No vehicles in exczss of 8,001 lbs -e allowed in residential districts.
Of the eight municipalities surveyed, two allow commercial vehicles of any weight to park
inresidential areas. Five municipalities allow commercial vehicles up to a maximum weight
to park in residential areas. Tbis weigh. rut ranges from 3,000 pounds to 12,000 pounds.
And one municipality allows no commer-al vehicles to park in residential areas.
OTH
ER DEPAR
--T
-M
,-EML COMME
All Village departments have reviewed the proposed amendment. Inspection Services
cautions that the proposed amendment could lead to requests for garage height variations
to accommodate larger vehicles.
STAFF C0MMEM,jRECQMNlENDATl0
The proposed amendment would allow commercial vehicles in excess of 8,000 lbs. to park
in a standard size garage as defined in the current Ordinance. Staff believes that by limiting
the garage size to the current standards, large vehicles will be eliminated from parking in
residential districts. However, it would be difficult to enforce the garage parking
requirement, and there would be occasions where a, truck is parked in a driveway prior to
being stored in the garage for the night. Staff believes the proposal by Mr. Schwartz is
reasonable, as garage size would effectively limit the size of trucks that could be parked.
DMC:hg
CAF/
6/10/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF
THE PREVAILING WAGE RATES
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted "An Act regulating wages
of laborers, mechanics and other works employed in any public works
by the State, County, Village or any other public body or any
political subdivision or by an one under contract for public
works," approved June 26, 1941, as amended (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1987, Ch.
48, para. 39s-1 et seq, as amended by Public Acts 86-799 and 86-.
693); and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid Act requires that the Village of Mount
Prospect of Cook County investigate and ascertain the prevailing
rate of wages as defined in said Act for laborers, mechanics and
other workers in the locality of said Village of Mount Prospect
employed in performing construction of public works, for said
Village of Mount Prospect.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: To the extent as required by "An Act regulating wages
of laborers, mechanics and other workmen employed in any public
works by the State, County, City or any public body or any
political subdivision or anyone under contract for public works,"
approved June 36, 1941, as amended, the general prevailing rate of
wages in this locality for laborers, mechanics and other workmen
engaged in the construction of public works coming under the
jurisdiction of the Village is hereby ascertained to be the same
as the prevailing rate of wages for construction work in the Cook
County areas as determined by the Department of Labor of the State
of Illinois as of June, 1992, a copy of which wage rates are ori
file with the Village Clerk in the main office of the Village. The
definition of any terms appearing in this Ordinance which are also
used in the aforesaid Act shall be the same as in said Act.
SECTION TWO: Nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply
said general prevailing rate of wages as herein ascertain to any
work or employment except public works construction of this Village
to the extent required by aforesaid act.
SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk shall publicly post or keep
available for inspection by any interested party in the main office
of this Village this determination of such prevailing rate of
wages.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk shall mail a copy of this
determination to any employer, and to any association of employees
and to any person or association of employees who have filed, or
file their names and addresses, requesting copies of any
determination stating the particular rates and the particular class
of workmen whose wages will be affect by such rates.
gZgII,
QL-.=: The Village Clerk shall promptly file a certified
copy of this determination with both the Secretary of State and the
Department of Labor of the State of Illinois and shall further
ENEWM
Prevailing Wage
Page 2 of 2
cause to be published in a newspaper of general circulation within
the Village, a copy of this determination which shall constitute
notice that the determination is effective and that this is the,
determination of the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect.
SECTION SIX: That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
1992.
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
7'1
Shinae Chun
Director
June 1, 1992 '-JUN 3 1992
To Whom It May Concern:
Pursuant to your listing on our annual mailing list for
prevailing wage rates, the enclosed county(jes) effective June 1,
1992 are being forwarded for your convenience.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
CONCILIATION AND MEDIATION DIVISION
CERTIFICATE
I, David H. Hayes, Manager, Division of Conciliation and
Mediation, Illinois Department of Labor, do hereby certify that I
am the keeper of the records, files, and Seal of said office and
that the attached is true and complete copy of the prevailing rate
of wages determined by this Department for the aforesaid county or
counties.
David H. Hayes
Division Manager
SEAL
310 SOUTH MICHIGAN AVENUE, 10th FLOOR ONE WEST OLD STATE CAPITOL PLAZA, ROOM 300 2309 WEST MAIN STREET
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60604 SPRINGFIELD, ILLINOIS 62701 MARION, ILLINOIS 62959
(312) 793-2800 (217) 782-6206 (618) 997-4371
IL. DEPT. OF LABOR PREVAILING WAGES FOR COOK COUNTY EFFECTIVE 06/01/92
DIVISION of CONCILIATION & MEDIATION PH(217-782-1710)
NAME OF TRADE
RGN
TYP
C
HOURLY -RATES
OVERTIME -RATES
HRLY-FRINGE-RATE,'
L
--------------------------------------
S
BASIC
FORMN
----------------------------------------------------
M -F>8
SAT
SU&HO
WLFR
PENSN
VAC -N
ASBESTOS ABT-GEN
BLD
19.750
20.250
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.470
1.050
0.000
ASBESTOS ABT -MEC
BLD
21.500
23.000
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.660
4.600
0.000
BOILERMAKER
BLD
24.730
25.780
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.150
2.000
0.000
BRICK MASON
BLD
19.260
20.260
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.100
0.000
CARPENTER
ALL
22.350
23.350
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.810
1.480
0.000
CEMENT MASON
ALL
21.500
22.250
2.0
1.5
2.0
3.550
1.980
0.000
ELECTRIC PWR EQMT OP
ALL
22.300
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.900
1.800
ELECTRIC PWR GRNDMAN
ALL
17.300
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.470
1.800
ELECTRIC PWR LINEMAN
ALL
22.300
23.800
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.900
1.800
ELECTRICIAN
BLD
22.650
24.150
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.840
2.920
0.000
ELEVATOR CONSTRUCTOR
BLD
23.420
26.350
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.495
2.090
1.410
FENCE ERECTOR
ALL
15.940
16.940
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.600
2.690
0.000
GLAZIER
BLD
20.500
21.500
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.950
2.650
0.000
HT/FROST INSULATOR
BLD
21.500
23.000
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.660
4.600
0.000
IRON WORKER
ALL
20.590
22.090
2..0
2.0
2.0
3.450
1.945
0.000
LABORER
ALL
18.750
19.250
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.470
1.050
0.000
LATHER
BLD
21.650
22.650
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.030
1.480
0.000
MACHINERY MOVER
BLD
21.800
22.800
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.000
1.000
1.500
MACHINIST
BLD
21.800
22.800
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.000
1.000
1.500
MARBLE MASON
BLD
21.080
21.480
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.700
1.000
0.000
MILLWRIGHT
ALL
22.350
23.350
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.810
1.480
0.000
OPERATING ENGINEER
BLD
1
24.600
25.350
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.950
2.400
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
BLD
2
23.300
25.350
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.950
2.400
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
BLD
3
21.650
25.350
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.950
2.400
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
BLD
4
19.900
25.350
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.950
2.400
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
FLT
1
25.530
27.030
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
2.250
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
FLT
2
22.720
27.030
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
2.250
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
FLT
3
18.890
27.030
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
2.250
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
HWY
1
22.900
23.400
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.900
2.350
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
HWY
2
22.350
23.400
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.900
2.350
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
HWY
3
21.200
23.400
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.900
2.350
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
HWY
4
19.800
23.400
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.900
2.350
1.250
OPERATING ENGINEER
HWY
5
18.600
23.400
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.900
2.350
1.250
ORNAMNTL IRON WORKER
ALL
21.610
22.610
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.900
4.320
0.000
PAINTER
ALL
20.700
23.290
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.500
1.000
0.000
PAINTER SIGNS
SLD
16.290
16.540
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.350
1.050
0.000
PILEDRIVER
ALL
22.350
23.350
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.810
1.480
0.000
PIPEFITTER
BLD
23.800
25.800
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.950
1.750
0.000
PLASTERER
BLD
20.850
21.850
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.250
0.000
PLUMBER
BLD
22.800
23.650
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.260
1.980
0.000
PLUMBER TECHNICAL
BLD
20.050
21.050
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
1.250
0.000
ROOFER
BLD
22.180
24.180
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.570
0.800
0.000
SHEETMETAL WORKER
BLD
23.150
24.650
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.540
2.690
0.000
SIGN -HANGER
SLD
17.000
17.500
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
1.250
0.000
SPRINKLER FITTER
SLD
22.820
24.070
1.5
2.0
2.0
3.350
3.000
0.000
STEEL ERECTOR
ALL
20.270
21.770
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.250
6.110
0.000
STONE MASON
BLD
17.760
18.760
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.100
0.000
TERRAZZO MASON
BLD
21.000
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.900
2.050
0.000
TILE LAYER
BLD
20.850
22.350
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.750
2.550
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
BLD
1
18.275
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.300
1.430
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
BLD
2
18.525
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.300
1.430
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
BLD
3
18.725
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.300
1.430
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
BLD
4
18.925
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.300
1.430
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
E
ALL
1
18.050
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.300
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
E
ALL
2
18.300
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.300
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
E
ALL
3
18.500
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.300
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
E
ALL
4
18.700
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.700
1.300
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
W
ALL
1
18.700
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.330
1.530
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
W
ALL
2
18.850
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.330
1.530
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
W
ALL
3
19.050
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.330
1.530
0.000
TRUCK DRIVER
W
ALL
4
19.250
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.330
1.530
0.000
TUCKPOINTER
BLD
21.850
22.850
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.150
2.350
0.000
*** PLEASE SEE ATTACHED FOR OVERTIME SPECIFICATIONS NOT LISTED.
COOK COUNTTY
TRUCK DRIVERS W That part of the county West of Barrington Road.
The following list is considered as those days for which holiday rates of wages for work performed apply:
New Years Day, Memorial/Decoration Day, Fourth of July, Labor Day, Veterans Day, Thanksgiving Day, Christmas Day. Generally, any of the
holidays which fall on a Sunday is celebrated on the following Monday. This then makes work performed on that Monday payable at t
appropriate overtime rate for holiday pay. Common practice in a given local may alter certain days of celebration such as the day afrx
Thanksgiving for Veterans Day. If in doubt, please check with IDOL.
EXPLANATION OF CLASSES
TRUCK DRIVER - BUILDING, HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION - EAST 4 WEST
Class 1. A -frame truck when used for transportation purposes; Air Compressors and Welding Machines, including those pulled by care, pick-up
trucks and tractors; Ambulances; Batch Gate Lockers; Batch Hopperman; Car and Truck Washers; Carry Alls; Fork Lifts and Holsters; Helpers;
Mechanics Helpers and Greasers; Oil Distributors, 2 -man operation; Pavement Breakers; Pole Trailer, upto 40 feet; Power Mover Tractors;
Self -Propelled Chip Spreader; Shipping and receiving Clerks and Checkers; Skipman; Slurry Trucks, 2 -mea operation; Slurry Trucks, Conveyor
operated - 2 or 3 -man operation; Teamsters, Unskilled DumFmen; Warehousemen and Dockmen; Truck Drivers hauling warning lights, barricades,
and portable toilets on the job site.
Class 2. Dispatcher; Dump Crete and Adgetors under 7 yards; Dumpaters, Track Trucks, Eucllde, Rug Bottom Dump Turnapulls or Turnatrailers
when pulling other than self -loading equipment or similar equipment under 16 cubic yards; Mixer Trucks under 7 yards; Ready -Mix Plant Hopper
Operator; Winch Trucks, 2 Axles.
Class 3. Cump Crete and Adgetors 7 yards and over; Dumpaters, Track Trucks, Euclids, Hug Bottom Dump Turnatrailers or Turnapulls when pulling
other than self -loading equipment or similar equipment over 16 cubic yards. Explosives and/or Plzalcn Material Trucks; Mixer Trucks 7 yards
or over; Mobile Cranes while in transit; 011 Distributors, 1 -man operation; Pole Trailer, over 40 feet; Pole and Expandable Trailers hauling
material over 50 feet long; additional 504 per hour; Slurry Trucks, 1 -man operation; Winch Trucks, 3 axles or more; Mechanic - Truck Welder
and Truck Painter.
Class 4. Asphalt Plant Operators in areas where it has been past practice Dual-purpose vehicles, such as mounted crane trucks with hoist
and accessories; Foreman; Master Mechanic; Self -loading equipment like P.B. and trucks with scoops on the front.
OPERATING ENGINEERS - BUILDING
Claes 1. Assistant Craft Foreman; Craft Foreman; Mechanic; Asphalt Plant; Asphalt Spreader; Autograde; Batch Plant; Benoto (requires Two
Engineers); Boiler and Throttle Valve; Caisson Rigs; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Back Hoe Front End -loader Machine; Compressor and
Throttle Valve; Concrete Breaker (Truck Mounted); Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver; Concrete Placer; Concrete Pump (Track Mounted); Concrete
Tower, Cranes, All, Cranes, Hammerhead, Crater Crane; Crusher, Stone, etc.; Derricks, All; Derricks, Traveling; Formless Curb and Gutter
Machine; Grader, Elevating; Grouting Machines; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader 2-1/4 yd. and over; Hoists, Elevators, outside type rack
and pinion and similar machines; Hoists, one, two and three Drum; Hoists, Two tugger One Floor; Hydraulic Backhoes; Hydraulic Boom Trucks;
Locomotives, All; Motor Patrol; Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Post Hole Digger; Pre -Stress Machine; Pump Crates; Squeeze Cretes-screw Type Pumps;
Gypsum Bulker and Pump; Raised and Blind Role Drill; Rock Drill; Nato Mill Grinder; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Slip -form Paver; Straddle
Buggies; Tournapull; Tractor with Book and Side Boom; Trenching Machines.
class 2. Bobcat (over 3/4 cu. yd.); Boilers, Brick Forklift; Broom, All Power Propelled; Bulldozers; Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over);
Conveyor, Portable; Fortlift Trucks; Greaser Engineer; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloaders under 2-1/4 yd.; Hoists, Automatic; Hoists, inside
Freight Elevators; Hoists, Sewer Dragging Machine; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Rollers, All; Steam Generators; Tractors, All; Tractor Drawn
Vibratory Roller (Receives an additional S•50 per hour); Winch Trucks with "A" Frame.
Claes 3. Air Compressor - Combination - Small Equipment Operator; Generators; Heaters, Mechanical; Hoists, Inside Elevators - (Rheostat
Manual Controlled); Hoists, Inside Elevators - Push Button with Automatic Doors; Hydraulic Power Units (Pile Driving and Extracting); Pumps,
over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 300 ft.); Pumps, Well Points; Welding Machines (2 through 5); Winches, 4 small Electric Drill
Winches; Bobcat (up to and including 3/4 cu. yd.).
Class 4. Hoists, Inside Elevators, Push Button with Automatic Doors; Oilers; Brick Forklift.
OPERATING ENGINEERS - HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTIOF.
Class 1. Craft Foreman; Asphalt Plant, Asphalt Heater and Planar Combination; Asphalt Spreader; autograder, Belt Loader; Caisson Rigs; Car
Dumper; Central Redi-Mix Plant; Combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine, (1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with attachments); Concrete
Breaker (Truck Mounted): Concrete Conveyor; Concrete Paver over 27E cu. ft.; Concrete Placer; Concrete Tube Float; Cranes, all attachments;
Cranes, Hammerhead, Linden, Peco A Machines of a like nature; Crete Crane, Crusher, Stone, etc.; Derricks, All; Derrick Boats; Derricks,
Traveling; Dredges; Field Mechanic -welder; Formless Curb and Gutter Machine; Gradall and Machines of a like nature; Grader, Elevating; Grader,
Motor Grader, Motor Patrol, Auto Patrol, Form Grader, Pull Grader, Subgrader; Guard Rail Post Driver Mounted; Hoists, One, Two and Three Drum;
Hydraulic Backhoes; Locomotive, All; Mucking Machine, Pile Drivers and Skid Rig; Pre -Stress Machine; Pump Crates Dual Ram (Requires frequent
lubrication and water); Rock Drill - Crawler or Skid Rig; Rock Drill - Truck Mounted; Roto Mill Grinder; Slip -Form Paver; Soil Test Drill
Rig (Truck Mounted); Straddle Buggies; Hydraulic Telescoping farm (Tunnel); Tractor Drawn Belt Loader; Tractor with Boom; Tractor -airs with
Attachments; Trenching Machine; Truck Mounted Concrete Pump with Boom; Raised or Blind Hole; Drills (Tunnel Shaft); Underground Boring and/or
Mining Machines; wheel Excavator, Widener (APSOO).
Class 2. Batch Plant; Bituminous Mixer; Bobcats (over 3/4 cu. yd.); Boiler and Throttle Valve; Bulldozers; Car loader Trailing Conveyors;
combination Backhoe Front Endloader Machine (lase than 1 cu. yd. Backhoe Bucket or over or with attachments); Compressor and Throttle Valve;
Compressor, Common Receiver (3); Concrete Breaker or Hydro Hamar; Concrete Grinding Machine; Concrete Mixer or Paver 7S Series to and
including 27 cu. ft.; Concrete Spreader, Concrete Curing Machine, Burlap Machine, Belting Machine and Sealing Machine; Conveyor Muck Care
(Haglund or Similar Type); Finishing Machine - Concrete; Greaser Engineer; Highlift Shovels or Front Endloader; Hoist - Sewer Dragging
Machine; Hydraulic Boom Trucks (All Attachments); Locomotives, Dinky; Pump Crates; Squeeze Cretes-Scrw Type Pumps, Gypsum Bulker and Pump;
Roller, Asphalt; Rotary Snow Plows; Rototiller, Seamen, etc., self-propelled; Scoops - Tractor Drawn; Self -Propelled Compactor; Spreader -
Chip - Stone, etc.; Scraper; Scraper - Prim Mover in Tandem (Regardless of Size) (Add $1.00 to Class II hourly rate for each hour and for
each machine attached thereto, Add $1.00 to Class II hourly rate for each hour); Tank Car Beater; Tractors, Push, Pulling Sheepe Foot, Disc,
Compactor, etc. Tug Boats.
Class 3. Boilers; Brooms, All Paver Propelled; Cement Supply Tender; Compressor, Common Receiver (2); Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over);
Conveyor, Portable; Farm -Type Tractors Used for Paying, Seeding, etc.; Fireman on Boilers; Forklift Trucks; Grouting Machine; Hoists,
Page 1 of 2
COOK COUNTY
Automatic; Hoists, All Elevators; Hoists, Tugger Single Drum; Jeep Diggers, Pipe Jacking Machines; Post -Hole Digger; Power Saw, Concre)e
Power Driven; Pug Mille; Hollers, other than asphalt; Seed and Straw Blower; Stem Generators; Stump Machine; Winch Trucks with ^A" Frame;
Work Boats; Tamper - Form -Motor Driven.
Class 4. Air Compressor - Small and Large; Asphalt Spreader, Backend Man; Combination - Small Equipment operator; Generators - Smell 5Okw
and Under; Generators - Large over 5Okw; Heaters, Mechanical; Hydraulic Power Unit (Pile Driving, Extracting, or Drilling); Light Plants,
All (1 through 5); Pumps, over 3" (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 300 ft.); Pumps, Well Pointe; Tract -airs; Welding Machines (2 through 5);
Winches, 4 Small Electric Drill Winches; Bobcats (up to and including 3/4 cu. yd.).
Class 5. Oilers.
Other Classifications of work:
For definitions of classifications not otherwise set out, the Department generally has on file such definitions which are available. If there
is no such definition on file, the Bureau of Labor Statistics SIC list will be used. If a task to be performed is not subject to one of
the classifications of pay set out, the Department will upon being contacted state which neighboring county has such a classification and
provide such rate, such rate being deemed to exist by reference in this document. Further, if no such neighboring county rate applies to
the task, the Department shall undertake a special determination, such special determination being then deemed to have existed under this
determination. If a project requires these, or any classification not listed, please contact IDOL at 217/782/1710 for wage rates or
clarifications.
Page 2 of 2
10 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IIHnois 60056 - Telephone: (708) 253-5675
May 22, 1992
Mrs. Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Il 60056
Dear Mrs. Fields:
Enclosed herewith is the Mount Prospect Public Library's
Annual Reportand Financial Report for the year May 1, 1991 -
April 30, 1992.
Yours truly,
Marilyn G. Genther
Deputy Director
MGG/mdt
Fq TO4 a
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
ss
COUNTY OF COOK )
I, SANDRA A. TRUESDALE, Secretary of the Board of Trustees
of the Mount Prospect Public Library do hereby certify that the
attached documents, to wit:
A) Annual Report of the Mount Prospect Public Library, and
B) Financial Report of the Library Fund
are true and accurate reports and fully reflect the receipts and
4Ekgpenditures of funds by the said Board of Trustees of the Mount
4-ospect Public Library, and
A. that, the unexpended cash and other working funds
as of April 30, 1992 were $ 1,203,735.60.
B. that, the Gift Fund has a balance as of
April 30, 1992 in the amount of $ 3,972.36.
C. that, the Building Fund has a balance as of
April 30, 1992 in the amount of $ 324.58.
"OFFICIAL SEW
Margaret D. T"
Notary
otary Public, state of Illinois
MY Commission Expires 7/1/94
Subscribed and Sworn
to before me this
30th day of April, 1992
SANDRA A. TRUESDALE
oo/oz/eo 06:45:24
"
Page z
Mount
Prospect robIio
Library
Financial
Report -
April 1992
91/92
Operating
P"T'-
YTD
Cash Plan
Expeivled
Expended
Unexpended
____________
__________
----- ____---
____________
zzoz
ouLAnzmS
1,225,500'00
105,576'33+
1,223,102'21
2,3e7,79
1102
zmanm - MEDICAL
71,000.00
7,220.46
70,126.94
873.0*
1103
I M a F
zue,euo'oo
8,859,5e
112,662'93
(3,062'92)
1104
M/c AND FICA
93,750'00
6,911,24
88,839.54
4,910,46
zzos
nmEMPzmr COMP
3,000.00
0.00
1,187.5e
1,812'41
1201
anozT
2,200.00
0.00
2,225.00
(25'00)
z��o
��ouL FEES
o,000'nn
0.00
5,318.50
2,681.50
1203
emzmczmo
.V,000.no
0.00
7,800'94
zyg'ua
1204
OTHER oPTo EXP
s,nnu'oo
2,458'*6
5,031'02
(sz'oz)
1205
COMM aEmvIcEo
5,100,00
372.6I
e,214.15
(114.15)
1207
CHILD P8VgRxmxS
5,000.00
322.55
5,081.13
(81.12)
zouo
PROF MEMBERSHIP
2,300.00
15.010
2,400'00
(100'00)
1209
ooAmo T AND o
2,*00'00
757.42
3,246.47
(646,47)
1210
STAFF r AND o
9,000.00
1,107.66
10,233'2e
(1,223'29)
1301
TELEPHONE
9,900.00
734.79
9,153.77
74*.23
1302
xmonnANmzE
us,snn'no
0.00
28,744.00
(3,444.00)
1303
PAPER
6,700.00
o'on
1,475.14
5,224.86
, 06/01/92 06:45:24
Page 2
Mount
Prospect Public
Financial
Report -
April 1992
91/93
operating
mzo
_ YTD
____________
Cash Plan
Expended
__________
Unexpended
lsV4
CATALOG BnpP
16,000'00
2,079'58
16,531,72
(53/.72)
1305
OFFICE SUPPLIES
8,500.00
653'13
7,850.69
e4e,31
1306
LIBRARY SUPPLIES
8,500,00
475.08
9,40*.64
(e09'64)
z3n*
POSTAGE
10,800.00
1,795,38
10,765,34
a«.es
1401
BUILDING M&zmr
18,000,00
928.47
I0,036.49
7,963.51
1402
EQUIPMENT M&Z0r
32,808.00
558.88
35,834.28
(3,834'28)
z
t�2'
RENTAL
6,000.00
364,50
5,958.42
41.58
�IozPMomr
1404
JaNzTonzAu ompp
7,000.00
1,482,36
0,82I.46
178'54
1408
EQUIPMENT
33,500.00
8,444'10
36,035.62
(2,535.62)
lsnz
HEAT, VENT, A/C
22,000,00
1,637,53
23,130.52
(1,I30.52)
1502
WATER AND SEWER
1,500'00
332.99
' 1,113.49
386'51
1503
Co07zmGnmCY
2,000,00
0.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
1504
CONTRACT GEBv
4,500.00
0.00
3,485.85
1,0I4'I5
1601
&onDr BOOKS
270,480.00
16,637.38
273,190.08
(2,710.08)
zeoz
xuDnor AUDIO
12,300'00
1,934'29
12,578.09
(278'09)
1603
CHILD BOOKS
72,170.00
4,202.72
78,933.78
(6,763.76)
zan^
CHILD AUDIO
7,508.00
1,456.31
7,065.74
(I65.74)
06/01/92 06:45:24
MTD
YTD
Page 3
Cash Plan
Mount
Prospect Public Library
Unexpended
-----_------
1100-1199
Financial
Report -
April 1992
91/92
Operating
MTD
YT3
6,930,79
1200-1399
Cash Plan
Expended
Expended
Unexpended
1606
132,900.00
10,772.16
130,470.79
2,429,21
PERIODICALS
21,000.00
0.00
21,235.81
(235.81)
1607
126,500.00
13,748.83
123,416.13
3,083.87
MICROFORM
30,000.00
0.00
29,928.60
71.40
1608
471,250.00
29,603.47
478,100.69
(6,850.69)
ADULT V/C
17,000.00
3,528.98
17,429.04
(429,04)
1609
2,233,500.00
182,692.08
2,227,906.82
5,593.18
CHILDREN'S V/C
8,000.00
547.79
8,108.06
(108.06)
1610
village totals
$2,823,655.00
FRAMED ART
2,000.00
0,00
1,980.00
20.00
1611
B90K BINDING
800.00
295.00
1,082.05
(282.05)
16t
CIPUTER SEARCHE
5,000.00
0.00
8,000.00
(3,000.00)
1613
COMPUTER S/W
25,000.00
1,001.00
17,969.46
7,030.54
2050
NON/BUDGET PYMNT
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
Summary of Financial Report
91/92 Operating
MTD
YTD
Cash Plan
Expended
----------
Expended
------------
Unexpended
-----_------
1100-1199
------------
Payroll Related
1,502,850.00
128,567.62
1,495,919.21
6,930,79
1200-1399
Other Admin
132,900.00
10,772.16
130,470.79
2,429,21
1400-1599
Building
126,500.00
13,748.83
123,416.13
3,083.87
1600-1999
Books & Library
471,250.00
29,603.47
478,100.69
(6,850.69)
Materials------------
----------
------------
------------
2,233,500.00
182,692.08
2,227,906.82
5,593.18
* Includes accrued
payroll and
benefits of
$50,657.00
** The official budget as submitted to the
village totals
$2,823,655.00
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
Cash Receipts
Financial Report For The Month Of April 1992
Balance Forward
Non -Income Cash
2114 ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE
Subtotal (2100-2199)
Primary Income
2210 TAX MONEY
2220 TAX MONEY (TRANSFERRED TO BUILDING FUND)
2230• PERSONAL PROPERTY REPLACEMENT TAX
2246 IPTIP INVESTMENT INTEREST
2254 NOW ACCOUNT INTEREST
2280 ILLINOIS PER CAPITA GRANT
Subtotal (2200-2299)
Circulation Income
2300 FINES
2310 VIDEO CASSETTE
2320 VIDEO CASSETTE (REWIND]
2330 LOST MATERIALS
2335 "LOVE MY LIBRARY" BAGS
2340 COMPUTER DISKETTE
2350 MEETING ROOM FEES
2360 NON RESIDENT FEES
2370 PROJECTOR RENTALS
2380 FAX MACHINE FEES
2385 FRAMED ART PRINT
2390 COPY MACHINES REFUNDS
2395 OVERAGES/(SHORTAGES)
Subtotal (2300-2399)
Month Year•
To Date To Date
1,179,692.38
0.00 0.00
------------ ------------
0.00 0.00
21,557.83 2,195,449.00
0.00 -134,633.21
4,969.66 22,114.80
2,721.81 48,867.77
193.63 3,905.86
0.00 48,384.70
------------ ------------
29,442.93 2,184,088.92
2,975.37
35,015.21
1,457.30
15,324.30
0.00
20.00
714.28
6,013.83
8.00
97.00
12.00
201.00
2,120.00
3,142.00
127.00
1,281.00
6.00
57.00
263.22
2,860.60
0.00
0.00
-12.60
-23.95
32.90
-1.99
7,703.47 63,986.00
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
Cash Receipts
Financial Report For The Month Of April 1992
Month Year
To Date To Date
------- -------
Miscellaneous Income
2410
COPY MACHINE COMMISSION
739.40
1,217.20
2430
MISCELLANEOUS
0.00
0.00
2440
TELEPHONE COMMISSION
108.76
914.89
2450
ONLINE SEARCH
0.00
14.88
2460
VENDING MACHINES
12.50
61.25
2480
READER/PRINTERS INCOME
24.65
------------
1,666.90
Subtotal
(2400-2499)
------------
885.31
3,875.12
Reimbursed Expenditures
2500
BUS TRIPS
0.00
3,660.00
2510
PROGRAMS
208.00
1,571.95
2515
STAFF PAYMENTS FOR ADULT AND CHILDRENS BOOKS
144.75
1,805.53
2520
MPPL GIFT FUND
214.65
610.04
2530
MISCELLANEOUS
264.80
14,353.16
2535
REFUNDS FOR OVERPAYMENTS OF BOOKS
0.00
611.31
2540
MEDICAL INSURANCE
926.00
9,541.00
2545
DONATIONS
0.00
2,350.00
2550
STAFF PAYMENTS FOR PHONE USE
43.71
214.34
2555
NSLS REIMBURSEMENTS
475.16
475.16
2560
STAFF PAYMENTS FOR ADULT + CHILDRENS VIDEOS
0.00
102.18
2570
STAFF PAYMENT FOR LIBRARY & OFFICE SUPPLIES
0.00
1,733.78
2580
STAFF PAYMENTS FOR JANITORIAL SUPPLIES
45.30
54.40
------------
* Subtotal
------------
(2500-2599)
2,322.37
37,082.85
* Total (2100-2499)
38,031.71 3,431,642.42
--------- ------------
Grand Total (2100-2599) 40,354.08 3,468,725.27
13
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
GIFT FUND
APRIL 30, 1992
BALANCE - APRIL 1, 1992
ADDITIONS:
Interest [The First Chicago
Bank of Mount Prospect]
NOW Account No. 2485061103962
Ronald W. Otto [Gift]
DEDUCTIONS:
Check No. 1003 --
Mount Prospect Public
Library General Account
[Experimental Aircraft
Association Chapter 89]
(In memory of
Victor Hevrlin)
Check No. 1004 --
Mount Prospect Public
Library General Account
(Experimental Aircraft
Association Chapter 89
(In memory of
Victor Hevrlin) $ 20.65
[Friends of MPPL]
(In memory of Arthur
Brady) 110.72
[Ron Otto] (Gift) 26.85
Check No. 1005 --
The Ayer Company
(Ron Otto) (Gift)
BALANCE - APRIL 30, 1992
CASH IN NOW CHECKING ACCOUNT
FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
NO. 2485061103962
$ 4,156.24
$ 10.16
50.00 60.16
---------- --
CONSISTING OF
56.43
158.22
29.39 - 244.04
-------------
3,972.36
3,972.36
BALANCE - APRIL 30, 1992 3,972.36
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
BUILDING FUND RESERVE
APRIL 30, 1992
BALANCE - APRIL 1, 1992
ADDITIONS:
DEDUCTIONS:
ALANCE - APRIL 30, 1992
CASH IN CHECKING ACCOUNT
NBD MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
NO. 0019 4816
BALANCE - APRIL 30, 1992
CONSISTING OF
$ 324.58
$ 324.58
$_ _324.58
$ 324.58
ID (For IsL use only)
ILLINOIS STATE LIBRARY, SPRINGFIELD, IL 62701-1796
PUBLIC LIBRARY ANNUAL REPORT
1991-1992
Every public library in Illinois is required by law (Chapter 61, Sec. 4-10, and elsewhere in the Illinois Revised Statutes)
to file this annual report with the State Library. The purpose of this report is to obtain and publish data on the resources
and services of all Illinois public libraries for use by all concerned. Each library is asked to file this report with its system
headquaters AS SOON AS POSSIBLE UPON (AND BY NO LATER THAN 30 DAYS AFTER) completion of its fiscal
year ending between July 1, 1991, and June 30, 1992. Please complete and return this form promptly. (By law, public
library districts have until Oct. 1 to file this report; however; it would be appreciated H the form is filed by Aug. 1.)
Every public library district should send the State Library a copy of the certified audit of Its accounts within 6 months
of the close of the fiscal year. That document can be sent to the State Library later.
Please do not leave any item blank. Enter "0" if the appropriate entry for an item is zero or "none." Enter "N.A." If
an item does not apply to your library. If an exact figure is not available for a particular item, but it is known that the
amount is greater than zero, enter an estimate of the amount. Type your responses or pr° ° in black ink. To help
prevent mistakes In assembling photocopies of several different libraries' reports, please write the name of your library
in the line provided in the right hand margin of pages 1-7.
IDENTIFICATION
01 . MOUNT PROSPECT
1. LodidCtion 1
Name of the municipality in which the central library is located.
2. Librarian PATRICIA A. KELLY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR 2
Give the name of the librarian in the Wowing order first name, last name. Married women should use their own names,
not their husband's first name (e.g., Mary Jones, NOT Mrs. John Jones).
3. Legal name of library MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY 3
4. Mailing address (include street and zip code plus four digit extension, if available) 4
10 SOUTH EMERSON STREET, MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056-3295
5. Library telephone (include area code) 708-253-5675 5
6. Library fax telephone number (include area code) 8-253-064 6
7: Library system NORTH SUBURB N LIBRARY. -SYSTEM 7
6. Population residing in tax base area (use latest official federal census figure) ............. 53,170_ 8
9. Type of library (please circle one):
City County District Park Town Township Village Other
10. Is your library involved in a contractual arrangement with another library to receive all '
libraryservices? ...................................................................................... Yes_ Nc x
If yes, list the name(s) of the library(s) with whom you contract for service.
10
a
w
L
`a
E
Z10
91/92
SERVICE OUTLETS AND HOURS
11. opening and dosing hours of the central library for use by the public In a typical week last October (i.e., a week
with no holidays and in which the library was open during Its regularly scheduled hours):
Monday 9 AM to 10 PM Saturday 9 AM to 5 PM
Tuesday 9 AH to 10 PM Sunday 12 PH to S PM
Wednesday 9 AM to 10 PM
Thursday 9 AM to 10 PM
Friday 9 AM to 10 PM 11
12. Total scheduled weekly public service hours for all service outlets: 78
(i.e., central library, branches and bookmobiles) ........................................................ 12
13. List branches (please attach additional sheets as necessary).
Nam Address
13
14. Total number of bookmobiles .... .......... ....... ............... ....... ................. -.. —0 14
15. Total annual attendance in library., ................ ................. ........................ 725,35415
(Report the total number of persons entering the library, Including persons attending activities and those persons requiring
no staff service. Use an actual annual count, N available., or use an annual estimate calculated from a count taken during a
typical week.)
REGISTERED BORROWERS
16. Total number of resident borrower's cards In force as of the last day of the fiscal you
45,054 16
17. Non-resident borrower's cards.
(if tax bill method is used to calculate non-resident Ivej please Indicate T.B.M. In "fee" blw*)
Number of family fees paid 10 Family fee (for use of Oils library)
127.00
$
Number of student fees paid — Student fee (for use of this library)
$ — 17
S0
18. Total number of non-resident borrower's cards purchased during the past fiscal year
10 - —18
E
2
19. Total amount of fees collected for non-resident borrower's cards in the past fiscal year $
1,281.00_19
2 0
91/92
r
RESOURCES OWNED
Held at End of Withdrawn Added Held at End
Last FY During FY During FY of This FY
(a) (b) (c) (d)
20. Number of zks 232,218 4,557 23,941 251,602 20
Report number of different physical volumes in your library for which you provide at least minimal access through the
library's catalog (on cards, In book form, on microfiche, online, etc.). include government documents arranged by Su Docs
classification. Exclude periodicals and microforms.
21. Video recordings 2,910 18 719 3,611 21
Report number of copies, of all formats, include videotapes, videocassettes, and videodiscs. Exclude slides or filmstrips.
22. Films 0 0 0 0 22
Report number of copies of motion picture films of all formats and all sizes.
23. Audio recordings 9,942 870 1,250 10,322 23
Report number of copies, of all formats. i phonorecords, tapas, cassettes, compact disks, etc.
1,195
24. Number of period" titles (magazines and newspapers only) currently received . .. . ............. 24
Exclude duplicates. include periodicals received by gift subscriptions, in microform, or as government documents.
USE OF RESOURCES (Report for your entire fiscal year)
25. Number of adult materials loaned .... . . . .. .................................................. 354 , 856 25
Count'all adult and young adult materials borrowed by patrons from your library (and any branches, bookmobiles or other
agency), Including interlibrary loans received from other libraries, bulk loan materials, reciprocal borrowing transactions,
and all print and non -print media such as films, records and art prints. 246,470
26. Number of juvenile materials loaned......................................................... 26
27. TOTAL loans (sum of Imes 25 & 26) ....................................................... , . 601,326 27
28. Reciprocal borrowing (Optional this fiscal year, required in 92-93) 45,339
Number of materials lent directly to card holders from other libraries during the fiscal year......,, 28
Interlibrary Loans
804
29. Number of interlibrary loans provided to other libraries during the fiscal year ........................ 29
30. Number of interlibrary loans received from other libraries during the fiscal year ..................... 2,727 30
Reference Ouestions
a
31. Number of reference (as opposed to directional) questions by phone or in person. Answer line 31a if you have w
data for the year; if not, use lines 31b and c. `o
b. Fora one week in October: asked b7 adults •2.299 ; 40,5by total 1868 E
a. For the year; asked b adults .L17 , asked children _. 0 , 5 _ ;
any y asked children 868 ;torsi 3,167 z
c. For any one week In April: asked by adults 3,073 ; asked by children 884 ;total 3�1
A reference question Is a question which requires the use of books, periodicals or other resources such as Index tools, the
library catalog, online dare bases or people outside the library.
3
91/92
FINANCIAL INFORMATION (REPORT WHOLE DOLLARS ONLY. Report for your entire fiscal year. Report all funds
received or spent, but do NOT Include funds spent by others for the benefit of the library.)
NOTE: If a certified audit of library accounts is prepared, please submit a copy as a supplement to this report on
or before October 1, 1992.
Library Receipts by Source (Do not include balance from previous year or income from tax anticipation warrants)
32. Local government (Include capital income from sale of bonds. Do not include Income from tax anticipation
warrants.)
a. Local Government (except capital income from sale of bonds) $ 2,195,449 32a
b. Capital income from sale of bonds. 32b
33. State government (exclude federal funds distributed by the state)
a. Per capita grants 48,385 33a
b. Equalization aid 33b
c. Corporate replacement tax 2 2 ,115 33c
d. Other (specify) 33d
34. Federal government {include federal money received through the state. e.g., LSCA grants, paid directly, to your
library)
a. LSCA funds received 34a
b. Other federal funds received 34b
35. All other receipts 1211789 35
Report all monetary receipts not reportede.g., endowment income, gifts and donations, fines, payments for contract
services, Interest Income, and receipts from a fibray system or from a loan or mortgage.
36. TOTA greoeipts (sum of lines 32-35) 2,387,73$ 36
Library Expenditures by Category (regardless of the source of funds)
37. Salaries and wages for all library staff INCLUDING building maintenance staff. 1,223,102 37
Include salaries and wages before deductions.
Exclude fringe benefits for all library staff:
36. Fringe benefits paid by the library for all library staff INCLUDING building 272,817
maintenance staff. 36
Include fringe benefits paid by the library, such as Insurance, IMAF, social security, etc.
39. Printed materials 403,975 39
Include expenditures for books, periodicals, microforms, pamphlets, government documents. etc.
40. Nonprint materials 65,73040
Include expenditures for all materials used by visual projection and/or sound reproduction (e.g., clime, phonorecords, tape
cassettes, filmstrips, slides, etc.), and lot framed pictures, sculpture, etc.
41. AN other operating expenditutes not entered above 266,469 41
Include expenditures for library and general office supplies, processing costs, commercial binding and rebinding, equipment,
rent, utilities, repairs, etc. Report purchase of fixed assets on line 42.
42. Capital outlay for binding construction 34 ,12 3 42
Show here the amount spent this year on construction of a new building or of an addition to or remodeling of an existing
building, which cost at least $1000. 100,511
43. Capital outlay for all other fixed assets 43
Report all expenditures for land and Improvements to land, for the purchase of existing building, for long-term debt retirement
(e.g., mortgage payments), for equipment costing over $1000, etc. Fixed assets are those things which are not consumed
In use, can be expected to last at least five years, and cost at least $1000.
44. TOTAL of all expenditures (sum of Ones 37-43) $ 2,366,727 44
Unes 36 and 44 need not agree,
91/92
PERSONNEL (Report status as of the last day of the fiscal year)
45. Staff Data (only for people paid b;/ -the library),
Group A: Professional librananz, 3r z ga and audiovisual specialists, etc.
List each Group A employee on a separate line below, and give the information requested in columns I -VI. Attach another
page If needed. Do not include persons employed as short-term. substitutes. Count in Group B a business manager or
other person not a librarian.
I. Name of employee (optional, except for head librarian), too not Include any vacant position other then head librarian,
11. Position code -- Please code each person who regularly spends at least 75% of his/her work week in duties
characteristic of, or directly related to, each of these positions.
1 - Children's and/or Youth Services Librarian
2 - Catalog Librarian
3 - Reference Librarian
4 - Other (specify)
Ill. Education — Use the highest appropriate number in the following code to indicate the extent of formal education.
1 - Less than a bachelor's degree
2 - Bachelor's degree
3 - Master's degree from other than ALA accredited library school program
4 - Master's degree from ALA accredited library school program
IK Sex. Use M for Mate and F for Female.
V. Hours worked per week. If exact number is not known, supply your best estimate.
VI. Hourly rate or annual salary. 45
(1) (11) (III) (IV) M NO.
Name of Employee Position Education Sex Hours Worked Hourly (Rate or
(Optional) (Specify code number) Per Week Annual Saiary
Group B. Full-time or pan: -time technical and clerical employees
Total number of hours all Group B employees worked in a typical week
Minimum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate)
Maximum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate)
Group C: Full-time or part-time pages or shelvers
Total number of hours all Group C employees worked in a typical week
Minimum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate)
Maximum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate)
Group D: Full-time or pan, -time building maintenance, security or plant operation employees
Total number of hours all Group D employees worked in a typical week
Mimimum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate)
Maximum hourly rate actually paid (convert annual salary to hourly rate)
46. How many hours per week is considered full-time equivalency in your library?
(For ISL use Only)
1: / 2: / 3: / 4: / P: N:
1214.20
$16.8
44.7
$ 4.34
$ 4.46
$ 6.96
$ 22.75
37.5 46
a
_e
a
5
0
E
Z
91/92
REFERENDA
47. WAS your library involved In a referendum during the last fiscal year? Yes — No X 47
it No, go directly to question 49. If Yes, Plena attach a Copy Of the ballot or a statement of the proposition as presented
to the voters. if more than one referendum occurred, report each separately.
48. For each type of referendum presented to the voters, indicate the date of the vote, and whether it passed or
failed. 48
Date of Referendum Passed Failed Effective
Date
Tax Increase Referendum
Bond Issue Referendum
Establishment Referendum
Annexation Referendum
Conversion Referendum
Other (please specify)
49. For district libraries only: If In the last year, or In the period before filing this report, you took action to convert to
public library district status by approval of your corporate authority (under PA84-1461), or annexed additional
territory in an unincorporated area by backdoor referendum (under Chapter 81, sec. 1002-8, of the ILLINOIS
REVISED STATUTES), indicate the effective, date of either action. 49
Effective Date
Conversion
Annexation
50. Name of library attorney John J. Zimmerman 50
Address 1190 S.Elmhurst Road Telephone(_ 708 439-2500
1 ount Proseect, IL 60056 51
51. Amount ol surety bo $
NOTE: Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter 81, requires that the bond be "not less than 50% of the total funds received
by the library in the last fiscal year" for municipalities of less than 50,000 population (Paragraph 4-9), and for public
library districts (Paragraph 111)04-110).
52. Person to contact (if necessary) concerning the information reported on this form:
Name: Maril n G. Geuther Telephone:( 708 253-5675 52
Deputy Director
CERTIFICATION
53. This annual report is filed by the undersigned bl� library pursuan to Chapter 81.Segticli) 4-
Vori
Illinois Revbrd
Statutes, for the fiscal year commencing Fay 19 — and ending 19 DrI ig 53 54
Report the beginning and endl , to's (month, day, of your most recently completed fiscal year.
54. Signature of the librarian
The board of directors herewith pts he �! , c@rtfilas its essential accuracy and transmits it to the Illinois
State Ubrary In accordance with(the above statute.
May 21, 1992 55
55.
Secretary (signature) Date signed by the secretary of the board.
Requires the signature of the secretary and president of the current library board.
�
J` n May 21, 1992
56. 56
- � 2�
President (signature) 44�� Date signed by the president of the board
HOURS
WORKED
HOURLY ANNUAL
POSITION & CODE NO.
EDUCATION
SEX
PER WEEK
RATE SALARY
(A) PROFESSIONAL
LIBRARIANS,
MEDIA AND AUDIO
VISUAL SPECIALISTS,,
ETC.
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR - 4
4
F
37.5
$ 63,000
DEPUTY DIRECTOR - 4
4
F
37.5
42,177
HEAD OF ADULT SERVICES
4
4
M
37.5
39,493
COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT
REFERENCE LIBRARIAN
- 4
4
F
37.5
33,750
REFERENCE LIBRARIAN - 3
4
F
37.5
23,925
*pe
FERENCE
LIBRARIAN - 3
4
F
37.5
27,560
AFERENCE LIBRARIAN - 3
4
F
37.5
23,228
REFERENCE LIBRARIAN - 3
4
F
37.5
24,625
REFERENCE LIBRARIAN - 3
4
M
37.5
29,213
REFERENCE LIBRARIAN - 3
4
F
29.1
14.43
HEAD OF TECHNICAL
SERVICES - 2
4
F
37.5
33,391
HEAD OF CHILDREN'S
SERVICES - 1
4
F
37.5
36,036
CHILDREN'S LIBRARIAN
- 1
4
F
37.5
26,925
SPECIAL SERVICES
COORDINATOR - 4
2
F
37.5
29,581
AUDIO-VISUAL TECHNICIAN/
GRAPHIC ARTIST -'4
1
F
37.5
22,094
(B) TECHNICAL, CLERICAL
AND OTHER STAFF
ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT
- 4
1
F
37.5
23,100
BOOKKEEPER - 4
1
F
37.5
22,217
DATA PROCESSING MANAGER
- 4
1
M
37.5
32,777
2
HOURS
WORKED
HOURLY
ANNUAL
POSITION & CODE NO. EDUCATION
SEX
PER WEEK
RATE
SALARY
(B) TECHNICAL, CLERICAL
AND OTHER STAFF
DATA PROCESSING
TECHNICIAN - 4
1
M
22.2
9.56
SPECIAL SERVICES
ASSISTANT - 4
2
F
24.6
10.60
PATRON ASSISTANT - 4
1
F
37.5
$ 20,670
PATRON ASSISTANT - 4
1
F
12.6
10.50
PATRON ASSISTANT - 4
4
F
15.8
10.30
PATRON ASSISTANT - 4
1
F
23.5
10.50
PATRON ASSISTANT - 4
2
F
28.6
10.60
PATRON ASSISTANT - 4
2
F
12.6
10.00
READERS ADVISOR - 4
2
F
19.2
10.50
READERS ADVISOR - 4
2
F
16.9
10.50
DOCUMENTS CLERK - 4
2
F
15.5
6.70
ERK - 4
2
F
18.7
6.90
ILDREN'S ASSISTANT
2
F
37.5
20,670
UTREACH LIAISON -
JLEMENTARY SCHOOL] 1
CRILDREN'S ASSISTANT
2
F
37.5
21,091
[OUTREACH LIAISON -
NURSERY SCHOOL AND
PRESCHOOL]
CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT -1
2
F
37.5
20,670
CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT -1
2
F
37.5
20,670
CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT -1
2
F
37.5
21,852
[NURSERY SCHOOL LIAISON
AND DEPT. PROGRAMMING]
CHILDREN'S ASSISTANT -1
2
F
16.3
10.60
HEAD OF CIRCULATION -4
1
F
37.5
30,764
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
F
37.5
16,408
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
I
F
37.5
13,456
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
I
F
37.5
13,849
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
M
37.5
13,592
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
M
8.3
6.97
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
M
16.0
6.70
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
F
18.0
6.70
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
F
14.5
7.10
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
M
29.8
6.70
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
F
18.8
7.10
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
I
F
26.7
6.70
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
I
M
17.5
7.10
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
1
F
16.0
6.70
CIRCULATION ASSISTANT -4
2
F
16.5
7.04
INFORMATION DESK ASS'T.-4
1
F
37.5
17,942
INFORMATION DESK ASST. -4
1
F
9.9
6.70
INFORMATION DESK ASST. -4
2
M
14.9
7.04
PROCESSING ASSISTANT -4
1
F
37.5
20,475
CATALOGING ASSISTANT -4
2
F
37.5
20,280
CATALOGING ASSISTANT -4
1
F
37.5
23,599
PROCESSING ASSISTANT -4
1
F
15.9
6.87
3
HOURS
WORKED
HOURLY
ANNUAL
POSITION & CODE NO.
EDUCATION
SEX
PER WEEK
RATE
SALARY
(B) TECHNICAL, CLERICAL
AND OTHER STAFF
PROCESSING ASSISTANT -4
I
F
9.6
$ 10.23
PROCESSING ASSISTANT -4
1
F
17.0
7.04
ACQUISITIONS CLERK -4
1
F
34.5
10.60
DATA ENTRY CLERK -4
1
F
12.8
10.00
PROCESSING ASSISTANT -4
1
F
16.0
7.31
(C) PART-TIME HOURLY
PAID PAGES OR
SHELVERS
SHELVER-4
1
F
5.4
$ 4.51
ELVER -4
1
M
16.7
4.34
ELVER -4
1
F
6.3
4.38
ELVER -4
1
F
16.3
4.46
(D) BLDG. MAINTENANCE,
SECURITY OR PLANT
OPERATIONS
MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR -4
I
M
37.5
$ 44,372
CUSTODIAN -4
1
M
37.5
21,314
MAINTENANCE -4
1
M
37.5
22,085
CUSTODIAN -4
1
M
17.3
6.96
CUSTODIAN -4
1
M
14.8
7.10
CUSTODIAN -4
1
M
14.8
7.25
CUSTODIAN -4
2
M
13.6
7.10
Thank you for completing this report. Please send one copy to your local government and send one original signed
copy to your library system headquarters. The system headquarters will return a photocopy to you, make another for
itself, a third for the University of Illinois Library Research Center, and send the original to the State Library.
You are invited to attach to this report comments or suggestions as to how we can improve ?`:is torm, what questions
were difficuft for yf;u to answe, on what other ,'epics you would like to see infor.matior, gerher-ja and rnade availlZble,
etr.
,For System Use Only)
Full name of system staff member who reviewed this form:
7
Z
E
tr
Z
91/92
CURRENT LIBRARY BOARD AND OFFICIALS
NOTE: This information is used for directory purposes. REPORT THE MOST RECENT INFORMATION AVAILABLE.
57.
President(a)_JACQUELINE C. HINABER
(h) __ 08-577-6354
rC)Q
Name
Vc, & Yr. When
,
211 WHF �OVVNTRY PI A(_:.:___.__,
ai()UNT PPO -IPE(:-
jj F 0, 0 'j
P,ege.rot Torm Inds
Aftres.l
58.
Vice-Pies"denj A. KERN
59.
Treasurer (a) THOMAS J. DUNN
(b)
708-259-6699
(c) __�193 59
(d) 711 S. I-OKA
MOUNT PROSPECT
, IL 60056
60.
SANDRA A. TRUESDALE
Secretary (a)
(b)
708-635-9625
5,'97
60
(d) 1633 ONE113A
MOUNT PROSPECT,
IL 60056
61.
A
Assistant firS
O'tge'rbe'
708-392-5227
5/93
(b)
(C) 61
(d) 302 S. I- KA AVENUE
MOUNT PROSPECT,
IL 60056
62.
(a). WILLIAM M. BLAINE, JR.
(b)
708-255-8410
(c) 5197 62
(d) 119 N. EMERSTON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT,
IL 60056
63,
(a) CHERYL A. QUINN
(b)
708-259-8807
5/95
(d) 1402 GREENWOOD DRIVE
MOUNT PRUSPECi
IL 60056
(d)
66,
(a)
(t))
(d)
67,
(a)
(b)
(c) 67
(d)
Thank you for completing this report. Please send one copy to your local government and send one original signed
copy to your library system headquarters. The system headquarters will return a photocopy to you, make another for
itself, a third for the University of Illinois Library Research Center, and send the original to the State Library.
You are invited to attach to this report comments or suggestions as to how we can improve ?`:is torm, what questions
were difficuft for yf;u to answe, on what other ,'epics you would like to see infor.matior, gerher-ja and rnade availlZble,
etr.
,For System Use Only)
Full name of system staff member who reviewed this form:
7
Z
E
tr
Z
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER wv_,
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
DATE: JUNE 11, 1992
SUBJECT: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE
Attached you will find the final draft of the 1992 update to the Village Comprehensive Plan.
The Plan includes all of the revisions sought by the Village Board as expressed over the past
month. Examples of more significant revisions are:
1. A change in the land -use classification on Maple Street to residential, revised
street classification for Maple Street to a local street, and elimination of the
proposed Maple Street crossing at Northwest Highway and the railroad as well
as moving the train station east of Emerson Street. The Plan calls for a study
of the street crossings of the track to determine how best to minimize railroad
and vehicular congestion.
2. A map of the Tax Increment Financing District has been added as Figure 2
3. Revision to commuter facilities at Maple and Lincoln on the Downtown Plan
4. Added language can be found on page 47, in the "Street Lighting" section,
which notes that deficient street lighting may be upgraded to current standards
in areas identified by the Village.
5. Include reference to upgrades on Mount Prospect Road from Northwest
Highway to Central.
6. The first paragraph in the "Zoning Ordinance" section on page 47, originally
identified for deletion, has been retained in order to explain the Ordinance.
If you see anything in the Plan that you would like to discuss prior to the meeting, please
feel free to call me.
DMC:hg
CAF/
6/12/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT IN ITS EUIRETY
WHEREAS, Chapter 24, Article 11-12-6 of the Illinois Revised
Statutes, permits municipalties to create, adopt and modify a
official Comprehensive Plan and map for its corporate boundaries
and unincorporated areas within one and one half miles of said
boundary; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has, from time to time,
adopted Comprehensive Plans and Generalized Land Use maps; and
WHEREAS, as authorized under Chapter 24, Article 11-12-7 of the
Illinois Revised Statutes and pursuant to proper legal noticd
having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on December 18,
1991, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
conduct a public hearings on Janury 8, 1992, January 15, 1992,
February 5, 1992 and March 15, 1992 for the purpose of considering
the adoption of a newly revised official Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has submitted its recommendations
relative to the newly revised Comprehensive Plan to the President
and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the recommendations of the Plan
Commision relative to the proposed Comprehensive Plan for the
Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: 'That the official Comprehensive Plan of the Village
of Mount Prospect, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof, is hereby adopted.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk of the Village of Mount
Prospect is hereby directed to file a copy of this Comprehensive
Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect with the Cook County
Recorder of Deeds, as provied by the Statutues of the State of
Illinois.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk of the Village of Mount
Prospect is hereby directed to publish, in pamphlet form, the
Official Comprehensive Plan being the subjec of this Ordinance.
SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
1992.
Gerald L. Farley, village President
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Adopted 1992
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS REVISED
1"2
MAYOR
Gerald L "Skip" Farley
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Mark W. Busse I -to Floros
George A. Clowes Paul Wm. Hoefert
Timothy J. Corcoran Irvana K. Wilks,
VILLAGE MANAGER
John F. Dixon
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING
David M. Clements, AICP
PLANNER
Michael E. Sims
PLAN COMMISSION
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Elizabeth A. Luxem
Lynn Kloster, Secretary
Thomas McGovern
Frank W. Boege
William Navigato
Thomas L. Borrelli
Carol Tor-torello
Louie Velasco,
FABLE OF CONTENTS
1.
INTRODUCTION
Page
The Comprehensive Planning Update Process .................... . .... 1
The Planning Strategy ................................... . . 2
Benefits of the Planning Program ...... . ........................... 3
2.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Village Identity .......................................... . 4
Housing and Residential Areas ........................... . .... . . 5
Commercial Development .................................... . .. 6
Industrial Development ...... . .. . ........... . ..... . ....... . , 6
Transportation ............................................ .7
Community Facilities and Services ............................ . . g
Parks and Recreation ........................................... 9
3.
LONG-RANGE PLAN
Residential .................... 11
Commercial ................................................. 13
Industrial......... ........„...,,„.,„.,.,.,.,................ 16
Central Business District ......... . ........... . .. „ „ ....., , , „ , , . 18
Transportation ............................................ .27
Community Facilities .................. . ....................... 35
Village of Mount Prospect Facilities and Utilities ..................... 43
4.
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
Zoning Ordinance ............................................ 47
Capital Improvements Program ........... . ....... . . . ... . ........ 48
Citizen Involvement ......... . ................ I ...... , , , ....... 48
Review and Revision......,„..................................48
Development Program ............ . .. . . . ..... . .......... . .... . . 48
Annexation.................................................55
APPENDIX I
Development Sites and Areas ......................... . .......... 55
LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES
Figures ~
l, Downtown Plan .....^,^...,...'......^....,......,.....,..'.. %U
I Thoroughfare P&ou .. .. .. , ..,.,........... ',. . .,.. . . ........ ... 28
4. Bike Route Map .... ...,'... , . ...... . ' . ... .. ^ .. ,... . . , . ....' 34
6. Development Areas and 8dcs . . , . .. .. .,. . . . . , . . . . . . . , . . ` . . . . . . . . . 56
A- Proposed Functional Cbasodicudoo of Area Street . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31
1. Existing Public Recreational Areas iuMount Prospect ................. 30
Z Inventory o[Schools in Mount Prospect ..'......................... 41
RESPONSIBILITY
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The preparation of the Comprehensive Plan and coordination of planning development
within Mount Prospect rests with the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect.
The Plan Commission is established under authority granted by Article VII of the Illinois
Constitution (concerning Nome Rule, adapted 1970) and by Chapter 24, Division 12, of
the Illinois Municipal Code, which reads in part as follows:
'The Plan Commission is authorized (1) to prepare and recommend to the future
development or redevelopment of the municipality. Such plan may be adopted in
whole or in separate geographical or functional parts, each of which, when adopted,
shall be the official comprehensive plan, or part thereof, of the municipality. The
Plan as recommended by the Plan Commission and as adopted in any municipality
in the state, may be made applicable by the terms thereof, to land situated within
the corporate limits and contiguous territory not more than one and one-half miles
beyond the corporate limits and not included in any municipality. Such plan may
be implemented by ordinances (a) establishing reasonable standards of design for
subdivision or resubdivision of unimproved land (b) to redevelopment in respect to
public improvements and..(c) may designate land suitable for annexation to the
municipality and the recommended zoning classification for such land upon
annexation, (2) To recommend changes, from time to time, in the official
Comprehensive Plan. (3) To prepare and recommend to the corporate authorities,
from time to time, plans for specific improvements in pursuance of the official
Comprehensive Plan. (4) To give aid to the Municipal officials charged with the
direction of projects for improvements embraced within the official plan, to further
the making of these projects, and, generally, to promote the realization of the
official Comprehensive plan....'.
INTRODUCTION
Mount Prospect has a strong history of community planning, with three major
comprehensive planning programs being undertaken since the late 1950's. These prior
planning programs were completed during periods of rapid growth and development within
the Village and greater northwestern suburban area. From 1950 to 1990, Mount Prospect
grew from a small residential community of approximately 4,000 in a somewhat rural
setting,to an established and diversified community with an estimated population of 53,170'
in an urban environment.
Mount Prospect is fast approaching maximum development. While little vacant land
remains to be developed, small portions or limited areas of the community are beginning
to show signs of age, and others are characterized by under -utilization and may have
potential for redevelopment.
This document represents an update of the Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois. The original plan was revised on April 8, 1981 and updated in 1984,
1988 and 1992. It had originally been prepared by the Village with the assistance of a
planning consulting firm. It responds to a critical need to guide and coordinate local
development and improvement actions. It includes long-range planning recommendations
for land -use, transportation, and community facilities, and an action -oriented
implementation program.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN REVISION PROCESS UTILIZED IN 1981
The plan and implementation program represents a significant commitment by Mount
Prospect to guide and control its future. It is based on several months of intense effort by
local residents, officials, and staff to review improvement needs and development
requirements. It reflects strong local consensus concerning what the Village should become
in the future. Key steps in the local planning process are outlined below:
Study Initiation. The overall study began in July, 1980, when Mount Prospect entered
into a contract with a consulting firm for the preparation of a plan and development
program. Early discussions with Village officials focused on the overall planning process
and the identification of major planning issues.
Community Planning Advisory Committee. To maximize direct local input into the
program, a 23 -member Community planning Commission was established to participate
in the process on a regular basis. Appointment included members of the Village Board,
Plan Commission, representatives of the business community, and other residents
representing various groups and neighborhood areas. This committee met regularly for
the duration of the program, and worked closely with Village staff and the consultant
team.
11990 U. S. Census
- 1 -
Neighborhood Workshops. During the first weeks of the program, a series of
neighborhood dialogue workshops were conducted to discuss the planning process with
local residents and to solicit their views about local issues, problems, and aspirations.
The workshops were undertaken prior to extensive analyses of community conditions
so that residents' views could set the tone and direction of subsequent investigations.
Background Studies. A series of background studies were then prepared by the
consultant and Village staff dealing with various aspects of the community, including
existing land -use, building conditions, community facilities, utilities, iraffic circulation,
and economic and population characteristics. These were discussed in detail with the
planning committee and were documented in several background work papers.
Needs and Opportunities. Based on the findings and conclusions from neighborhood
meetings, background studies, and working sessions with the Plan Commission and
Comprehensive Planning Committee, community needs and opportunities were
identified and evaluated.
Goals and Objectives. Based on the conclusions of all previous work activities, a
preliminary list of planning goals and objectives was prepared dealing with various
component parts of the community. These goals and objectives began to define what
kind of community Mount Prospect should be in the future, and provided important
guidelines for planning evaluation and decisions.
Community Questionnaire. A comprehensive community questionnaire was prepared
by the Village and distributed to all households in Mount Prospect, soliciting opinions
on a range of planning and development issues. Approximately 2,700 survey forms were
returned. Responses were tabulated and analyzed by various subject areas, and the
subject areas of consensus and conflicts were identified.
Concept Plans and Strategies. Alternative concept plans and strategies for guiding
future growth and development were prepared and evaluated. The process of evaluation
involved several meetings with and direct participation by the Plan Commission and
Comprehensive Planning Committee members.
Plan and Program Preparation. Based on preliminary consensus reached on preferred
concepts and strategies, draft plan maps and text were prepared and delivered to the
plan Commission, Comprehensive Plan Committee and other governmental
organizations in December, 1980.
THE PLANNING STRATEGY
The Mount Prospect Comprehensive Plan is characterized by a dual focus: a long-range
plan for guiding overall Village development and short-range action plan for implementing
specific high-priority projects and programs.
The long-range plan indicates a general framework for change over the next 20 to 25 years.
It is general in nature and is open to modification and refinement. Its purpose is to
establish long-term targets for development and redevelopment as interpreted at this time.
It can help guide and coordinate day-to-day decisions facing the Village, without precluding
action on unforeseen opportunities or possibilities,
The short-range plan is specific. It designates projects and programs which can be
accomplished during the next five years. It should be perceived as the starting point for
implementation of long-range recommendations. At the end of five years, a second
short-range action plan should be prepared, reflecting local aspirations and priorities at
that time. The Comprehensive Plan is to be updated annually by a sub -committee of the
Plan Commission in cooperation with the Village Planning staff.
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE PROCESS FOR 1992
The update process began during the summer of 1991 with the video taping of all vacant
parcels and potential redevelopment sites in the Village and adjacent unincorporated areas
in Cook County. The video was used with zoning and Sidwell maps and other tools to aid
the Comprehensive Plan Committee and staff in evaluating the appropriate use of each
property.
Data was also gathered from school and park districts, the public library and other
institutions in order to update data and incorporate their plans with those of the Village.
A public hearing was hearing on January 8, 1992 to receive public comments. The Village
believes that citizen input is extremely valuable and essential in the development of a well
thought out and feasible plan.
BENEFITS OF THE PLANNING PROGRAM
The overall comprehensive planning program should result in a number of benefits for the
Mount Prospect Community.
For the first time, a wide range of data and materials on local conditions was assembled
and recorded in 1980. The process has encouraged local residents to consider the future
of their community more directly and to actively discuss future options and alternatives.
It has resulted in a plan for future growth and development which represents strong local
consensus.
The plan promotes a balanced and orderly future development pattern which should
enhance the local living environment. It establishes an overall framework for coordinating
both public and private development. It provides guidelines by which the Plan
Commission and Village Board can review and evaluate individual development proposals.
It provides a guide for public investments and can help ensure that local public dollars are
spent wisely for community facilities and services. It clarifies long-range Village policies
so that individual property owners and developers can prepare and coordinate their own
development plans. Most importantly, the updated Comprehensive Plan is evident of the
Village's commitment to planning for its future on a continuing basis.
- 3 "
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
To be effective, the Mount Prospect planning program must respond to the special needs,
values and desires of local residents. Goals and objectives provide this specialized guidance.
In essence, these transform collective community values into operational statements which
can be used as guidelines for the planning program.
Goals and objectives each have a distinct and different purpose in the planning process:
-GOALS describe desired end situations toward which planning efforts should be
directed. They are broad and long-range. They represent an end to be sought, although
they may never actually be fully attained.
-OBJECTIVES describe more specific purposes which should be sought in order to
advance toward the overall goals. They provide more precise and measurable guidelines
for planning action.
Collectively, goals and objectives indicate where a community wants to go or what it wants
to become in the future.
The following pages present a listing of goals and objectives in several general categories:
identity, housing and residential areas, commercial development, and parks and recreation.
VILLAGE IDENTITY
Goal
The goal is to provide a strong and positive Village image and identity through distinct
Village features, facilities, and programs.
Objectives
1. Maintain the attractive appearance of existing residential neighborhoods, while
applying standards to assure the long-term stability of the neighborhoods.
2. Improve the character and appearance of the commercial environment, with
particular emphasis on the downtown area as the center of the Village.
3. Institute a community -wide beautification program including distinctive approach
routes and entrance areas, special boundary features between various land -use districts,
a series of strategically located focal points and open spaces; and improvement in the
condition and appearance of all rights-of-way.
4. Expand programs of cultural and community activities which set a high standard for
such activity and which can be enjoyed by all Village residents.
.4.
5. Establish a program of Village events which contribute to the Village's goals and
which contribute to its image and aspirations.
HOUSING AND RESIDENTIAL AREAS
Goal
A housing inventory and living environment which supports the local population,
accommodates a reasonable level of growth, and maintains the overall quality and
character of the Village.
Objectives
1. Maintain the predominant single-family image and character of the Village
2. Maintain the attractive quality of existing single-family and multi -family residential
neighborhoods and establish a Village -wide program of resident involvement to achieve
this objective.
3. Protect residential areas from encroachment by land -uses which are incompatible
or which may create adverse impacts, such as illegal home occupations.
4. Promote the improvement and rehabilitation of deteriorating housing properties.
5. Promote new residential development designed to have a variety of housing types
and prices.
6. Promote new housing for the elderly which is convenient to shopping, Village
facilities and services, and transportation.
7. Facilitate the affordable housing needs of low- and moderate- income residents of
the Village.
8. Encourage the development of programs providing housing opportunities for first-
time low-income homebuyers utilizing the new federal HOME Program.
9. Promote a financial rental assistance program throughout the Village for low-income
residents.
10. Assist in locating financial resources for the rehabilitation of housing for the
mentally ill.
11. Promote standards to prevent deterioration and over -crowding in higher density
housing.
-5-
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
Goal
A system of commercial development which secures the Village's regional significance
as a retail center while providing the local residents with adequate local or neighborhood
retail facilities..
Objectives
1. Maintain Village services and facilities which assure the long-term economic strength
of the various commercial centers and areas within the Village.
2. Maintain and expand retail and commercial services in the Village.
3. Ensure that all retail, office and commercial activities are concentrated within or near
areas of similar or compatible use.
4. Initiate programs to encourage improvement of the condition of older existing
commercial buildings and areas.
5. Provide convenient access to, and adequate employee and patron parking in all
shopping areas.
6. Promote new commercial development which will further strengthen and expand the
Village's tax and economic base.
7. Promote redevelopment within select locations along Rand Road and along Northwest
Highway.
8. Minimize conflicts between pedestrians and vehicular traffic in the downtown area.
9. Define more specific functional roles for the various commercial areas within the
Village.
10. Further implement a comprehensive revitalization program in the downtown area.
11. Design and implement strategies for attracting commercial and industrial
opportunities to Mount Prospect.
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
Goal
To develop an industrial base which assures a diversified economy and which
complements other types of local development.
-6-
Objectives
1. Promote industrial development near major transportation facilities.
2. Provide for the orderly expansion of existing industrial areas and activities.
3. Promote the corrective maintenance of industrial properties in poor condition.
4. Ensure that all new industrial development is concentrated in areas of similar or
compatible use.
5. Minimize the negative impact of industrial activities on neighboring land -uses.
6. Require all industries to meet performance standards for noise, air, odor and other
forms of environmental pollution.
7. Formulate special design and development standards to ensure that new industrial
development complements the overall character of the Village.
8. Encourage the development of new industry that maximizes use of the local labor
force.
9. Promote the Cook County 6A and 6B Property Tax Incentive Program.
TRANSPORTATION
Goal
To provide a balanced transportation system which provides for safe and efficient
movement of vehicles and pedestrians, reinforces surrounding land development and
enhances regional transportation facilities.
Objectives
1. Reduce congestion on all major arterial streets.
2. Correct localized traffic operational problems.
3. Minimize non -local traffic within residential neighborhoods.
4. Provide for safe bicycle movement within the Village through the development of
bicycle routes and other facilities.
S. Promote and encourage safe and convenient public transportation within the Village
and to other adjacent and nearby communities and destinations.
6. Monitor and maintain commuter parking facilities to serve METRA
-7-
7. Reduce congestion at and around the METRA Station.
8. Increase pedestrian safety throughout the Village.
9. Encourage the development of commuter parking facilities in outlying locations within
the Village and in adjacent communities, and the provision of improved transit service
to and from such facilities and the METRA Station.
COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES
Goal
To provide a system of community facilities which provides for efficient and effective
delivery of public services required by Village residents.
Objectives
1. To assure an adequate level of fire and police protection throughout the Village.
2. Encourage the availability of high-quality primary and secondary education.
3. Maintain adequate public water supply, sanitary and storm sewer systems.
4. Maintain adequate sites for Village facilities.
5. Improve facilities and services for senior citizens and other residents needing
assistance.
6. Promote the viable re -use of schools or other public buildings that may be closed in
the future for other uses such as day care centers, pre-school, teen activity, senior citizens
centers and other similar facilities.
7. Increase the Village's ability to plan for andprogrampublic improvements.
8. Encourage the development of a commuter rail service on the Wisconsin Central
Railroad line as identified in the 2010 Regional Transportation Plan.
9. Encourage the implementation of the 2010 Regional Transportation Plan in Mount
Prospect.
10. Prepare a public facilities improvement plan for bringing recently annexed areas up
to Development Code standards.
-8-
PARKS AND RECREATION
Goal
To provide an open -space system which satisfies the recreational and leisure -time needs
of Village residents.
Objectives
1. Work with the Park Districts to maintain a local park system which complements the
regional recreational opportunities available in adjacent forest preserves.
2. Develop new recreational facilities and programs which respond to specific desires
of Village residents.
3. Provide small new park sites in neighborhoods where there is insufficient park space.
4. Ensure that parks and recreational facilities are easily accessible from residential
areas and are available at times which coincide with the available leisure time of
residents.
5. Utilize existing park and recreational facilities to the maximum.
6. Ensure that adequate sites for future parks are set aside as a part of new residential
developments.
7. Promote continued cooperation between park and school districts in the provision
of recreational services.
8. Promote development of recreational facilities as part of large scale planned
developments.
LONG-RANGE PLAN
The Long -Range Plan provides a general framework for improvement and development in
Mount Prospect over the next 20 to 25 years. It establishes long-term targets for key aspects
of the Village consistent with the community's overall goals and objectives. It is specific
enough to guide day-to-day development decisions, yet flexible enough to allow modification
and continuous refinement.
The Long -Range Plan contains three primary components: land -use, transportation, and
community facilities. Planning recommendations for each of these components are
discussed below. Detailed information on existing conditions, issues and alternatives are
covered in the background work papers prepared as a part of the Comprehensive Planning
Program.
-9-
Iln_x'_�
The Village of Mount Prospect covers an area of approximately ten square miles located
22 miles northwest of downtown Chicago. It is bordered on the north by Wheeling and
Prospect Heights, on the east by the Cook County Forest Preserve and Des Plaines, on the
south by Des Plaines and Elk Grove Village, and on the west by Arlington Heights. The
Village is bisected by several major transportation corridors; the Chicago and Northwestern
Railroad, which runs diagonally through the Village from a southeast to a northwest
direction, Northwest Highway (Route 14), which runs parallel to the Chicago and
Northwestern Railroad, Rand Road (Route 12), which also runs diagonally through the
Village from a southeast to a northwest direction in the north half of the Village, and
Elmhurst Road (Route 83), which runs north and south through the center of the Village.
Mount Prospect is an established, essentially built-up community, with relatively new
residential and commercial development occupying the major portion of the Village. Since
most of the community is already committed in terms of land -use, the existing development
pattern significantly influences the type and extent of new development which will be
possible, and the extent to which redevelopment will be appropriate.
This section presents recommendations for specific land -use areas within the Village
Plan Recommendations
The Generalized Land -Use Plan provides a guide for future land -use development
decisions within the Village. It identifies which lands should he utilized for residential,
commercial, industrial, and public land -use activities. The Plan also describes
interrelationships between various land -use areas, and the types of projects and
improvements desirable within each area.
The Land -Use Plan is based on several overall principles and standards for improvement
and development. These principles, which provide the overall framework for specific
land -use recommendations, include the following:
Mount Prospect is essentially an established, built-up community. Land -use
recommendations should be focused on strengthening existing functional areas and on
promoting desirable new development in selected areas.
The strong residential image and character of Mount Prospect would be maintained and
reinforced. New residential development should reflect quality of design and construction
and should be in harmony with existing development. While housing types and densities
may vary, the overall image of the Village should continue to be that of a single-family
residential community.
The important role of Mount Prospect as a commercial focal point for the surrounding
area should be reinforced. Areas for various types of commercial development, including
community, highway oriented, and neighborhood convenience commercial should be
clearly identified and standards established to guide their development.
The Village should strive to capitalize on opportunities for capturing new office research
and industrial development in highly accessible locations, particularly in the southwestern
area.
Recommendations for land-use areas are presented below. A detailed, parcel-by-parcel
description of land-use recommendations for specific areas subject to change or
intensification is included in Appendix I.
Residential Areas.
Mount Prospect has traditionally been a strong and desirable residential community. While
the local commercial and industrial sectors have experienced rapid growth in recent years,
existing residential neighborhoods still represent one of the Village's most important assets.
The Land-Use Plan attempts to strengthen and reinforce existing residential areas and
promote quality new residential development in select locations.
Principles and Standardl
Several general principles and standards should guide improvement and development within
residential areas:
Existing single -family residential neighborhoods should be maintained and protected and
neighborhood quality must be preserved. Overall environmental and public service
improvements should be undertaken where necessary, and the negative impact of traffic and
non-residential uses on neighborhoods should be minimized.
Existing residential areas showing initial signs of decline should be targeted for corrective
actions.
New multi-family housing should be developed in selected areas along major streets,
adjacent to major shopping areas, or adjoining existing multi-family development. In special
cases, new multi-family development could also be appropriate adjacent to public parks or
other significant features.
New multi-family areas should be developed as overall, planned residential environments.
Within large development areas, a range of housing types should be promoted with each
area sharing a common character and unified environment.
New housing areas should be served by a safe and convenient circulation system with streets
and roadways relating to and connecting with existing streets in adjacent areas. However,
residential access should be separated from nonresidential traffic wherever possible.
Any significant new multi-family development should include a new public park site
designed to meet the needs of the new residents.
- 11 -
New multi -family development should include a distinctive landscaping and open space
system as an integral part of the overall site design.
Small-scale Infill" residential development should be compatible and in character with
surrounding existing development.
Landscaping or other buffering techniques should be used to screen residential areas from
adjacent non-residential uses.
Special planning and design incentives should be developed to ensure that new residential
areas include a wide range of amenities.
Planning and design innovations in both housing structures and land development should
be actively encouraged through careful use of the Planned Unit Development (PUD)
technique.
Planned Unit Developments should be encouraged in and near the Downtown.
Special attention should be focused on maintaining older residential areas. Of particular
immediate concern should be addressing the blighting private property and street conditions
throughout Census neighborhoods 9, 10 and 13. Neighborhood 9 is bounded by Golf Road,
Busse Road, the Northwest Tollway, and the western municipal boundary of the Village.
Neighborhood 10 boundaries are Golf Road, Linneman Road and Cottonwood Drive to the
north, Elmhurst Avenue to the east, the municipal boundaries to the south, and Busse Road
to the west. Neighborhood 13 is the area between Wheeling Road, Euclid Avenue, East
Drive and Kensington Road. These and other areas are good, stable neighborhoods for
affordable housing and starter homes and special efforts should be made at increasing their
desirability.
Plan Rec9mmendations
The Land -Use Plan indicates three residential categories:
Single-family rgsidtntial development would continue to be the predominant land -use within
the Village. This development, essentially in place today, would be concentrated in several
large residential neighborhoods. Existing neighborhoods vary in terms of character and
density, and were developed at different points in time by different developers. Earlier
single-family homes were constructed in the central portion of the Village, conforming to
the basic grid pattern of streets, at an overall density of five to eight units per net acre.
(Net acre as used throughout this Plan refers to the average number of dwelling units on
a building site. Streets, alleys, and common drives, etc. are not included.) Newer
single-family homes were developed on somewhat larger lots in the northern and western
portions of the Village primarily at densities of three to five units per acre, with
neighborhoods characterized by curvilinear street patterns.
All existing single-family neighborhoods should be strengthened through a range of
community facility and support service improvements, including expanded park and
-12-
recreational facilities where needed. Transportation projects would help reduce through-
traffic within certain neighborhoods, as well as improve operational conditions at problem
intersections in other neighborhoods. Boundaries between neighborhoods and commercial
and industrial areas should be clarified and strengthened, and incompatible land-uses either
eliminated or screened and buffered.
Since all single -family neighborhoods are essentially built-up, few new single -family homes
will be constructed in the Village, except on scattered vacant lots within established
neighborhoods. Infill development on these lots should be of a scale and character similar
to existing homes in the immediate area.
- multi-family ro&ntial deve opment would be located at certain locations
along major streets and near other activity centers. Existing multi-family development,
reflecting a density of 6 to 16 units per net acre, is located near the intersection of Foundry
Road and Des Plaines River Road, adjacent to the Old Orchard Country Club, and along
the western -edge of Boxwood adjacent to Randhurst Shopping Center. Additional
low-density Multi-family development exists at several scattered locations near the Rand
Road corridor, Northwest Highway, and in the southwest portion of the Village.
Low-density residential development may accommodate a range of housing types, including
duplex, townhouse, and two• and three-story apartment buildings.
Medium-density multi-f
amily re5idential devopmgnt would be located near major activity
centers within the Village. Existing medium-density multi-family development,
predominantly reflecting densities between 16 and 25 units per net acre, exist at scattered
locations near Rand, Central, and Golf Roads, and in larger concentrations in the
southwestern portion of the Village.
Several areas are recommended for new medium-density multi-family residential
development in the future. The largest includes approximately 16 acres located between
Dempster and Algonquin, West of Elmhurst Road, adjacent to existing multi-family
development, as well as commercial and light industrial uses. These lots are shown on
Figure 5 as Lots C and D in Area 6. One smaller vacant area is located adjacent to
existing medium-density multi-family development on the north side of Algonquin Road
west of Prospect Commons Apartments.
The design and development of new medium-density development should be carefully
controlled to ensure a compatibility with surrounding uses, adequate screening and
buffering, and a high-quality living environment.
_Commercial Areas
The Land-Use Plan strives to strengthen and reinforce the role and function of existing
commercial areas in the Village and promote viable new commercial development in
selected locations. The plan includes two general types of commercial areas, each with
different characteristics and requirements: community commercial areas, which contain a
wide range of retail and shoppers goods establishments, and which include Randhurst,
Mount Prospect Plaza, other shopping centers, and the downtown; and general business
-13-
areas, which contain a range of office, business, and commercial service establishments,
including the Rand Road and Northwest Highway corridors, proposed development along
Elmhurst Road, and several small neighborhood convenience centers which provide for the
day-to-day shopping needs of surrounding residents.
Principles and Standards
Several general principles and standards should guide improvement and development within
commercial areas:
In general, new commercial development should complement and relate to major
commercial uses already. located in the surrounding area. Increased interaction and
support between uses should be encouraged, particularly in the downtown and community
commercial areas.
Since most commercial areas are located along major thoroughfares, access to
commercial properties should be carefully designed to minimize conflicts with traffic
movement. The consolidation of access for several individual properties should be
encouraged.
Further "strip" commercial development within the Village should be discouraged. Where
possible, new commercial uses along major arterial should be clustered in small groupings
with shared parking areas, common access drives, and related design and appearance.
Overall environmental conditions within existing commercial areas should be improved.
The general condition of commercial buildings, grounds, and parking areas should be
improved, especially in several areas along Northwest Highway and Rand Road. Curbs
and sidewalks in certain areas should be repaired.
The relationship between adjoining commercial and residential areas should be improved.
Small neighborhood convenience centers, including food, drugs, and personal service
businesses, should provide for the day-to-day needs of nearby residents. Spillover
commercial traffic and parking on adjacent residential streets should be eliminated.
The overall maintenance and "housekeeping" along alleys and the rear portions of
commercial blocks, particularly along Northwest Highway, should be improved.
Special standards and guidelines for major commercial areas have been adopted for
landscaping, setbacks, sign control, etc., to help ensure the highest possible quality of
design and development.
Landscaping and other buffering techniques should be used to screen commercial areas
from adjacent residential neighborhoods in accordance with the Village Landscape
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance,
Developers of major commercial areas are required to provide thorough market studies
relating to growth trends, shopping habits and disposable income.
-14-
Plan Reommendations.
The Land -Use Plan indicates two basic types of commercial areas, including community
commercial areas and general business areas. Land -Use recommendations for these areas
are presented below.
Community commercial areas contain a wide range of retail and shopper goods
establishments, and include the larger concentrations of commercial activities such as
Randhurst, Mount Prospect Plaza, and the downtown. Randhurst is an established
regional shopping center, and Mount Prospect Plaza functions as a smaller, community
shopping center. Both centers should be continually upgraded in physical condition,
appearance, and tenant mix to maintain their competitive positions in the region and
community and to assure their continued economic contribution to the Village. Plan
recommendations are focused on strengthening and reinforcing existing community
commercial areas, including environmental improvements and transportation and public
service projects which could directly or indirectly benefit these important focal points.
No major land -use changes are recommended within most community commercial areas,
and little currently vacant land is indicated for community commercial development in
the future. A strategy for attracting new commercial ventures, utilizing available
resources when appropriate and upgrading existing businesses should be created and
implemented.
The Land -Use Plan recommends more significant changes within the downtown area.
The plan recommends that the Downtown be strengthened and improved as a focal point
for the community. The Downtown should be reinforced as a multi -use area with
expanded office and convenience shopping districts, key public and semi-public facilities,
and new close -in townhouse and condominium development. Specific land -use
recommendations for Downtown are included in a following section of the
Comprehensive Plan.
Qeneral bu5iness area contain a range of office, business, and commercial service
establishments, and include primarily linear developments along the Rand Road,
Northwest Highway, and Elmhurst Road corridors. Several functional and operational
problems are present in these three corridors. Small pockets of residential uses still
exist within the commercial strips and are not compatible with. surrounding uses.
Residential uses also abut the rear of commercial properties along each corridor. Land
for commercial development or expansion is quite limited. Many commercial uses
provide small on-site parking lots which result in numerous curb -cuts along heavily
traveled streets and promote conflicts between through traffic and vehicles using the
small parking areas. The plan strives to correct a number of these problem conditions,
and strengthen and improve existing commercial corridors in the future.
Rand Road would continue to accommodate a wide range of commercial, office, and
business service activities, as well as several important public land uses. The plan calls
for eventual development and redevelopment of several currently vacant and
under-utilized land parcels scattered along the street. In general, land -use
recommendations tend to reinforce and strengthen the commercial and office function
-15 -
of the corridor, while maintaining sound clusters of residential development and public
uses in certain locations. In addition, the plan strives to ensure a compatible relationship
between commercial activities and adjacent residential areas.
The Northwest Highway corridor would also continue to accommodate a wide range of
commercial and office activities, although land for commercial expansion is quite limited.
No major land -use changes are recommended, except in the downtown area. However,
a number of operational improvements should be undertaken, including the consolidation
of vehicular access drives off Northwest Highway, the redesign and possible expansion
of off-street parking areas, and overall appearance and "housekeeping" improvements.
Alleys and the rear portions of buildings should be better maintained, and curbs and
sidewalks should also be improved in several areas.
Elmhurst Road, south of Golf Road, is a major corridor for highway oriented commercial
uses. Plan recommendations tend to reinforce this function, and several vacant land
areas south of Dempster in Lake Center Plaza are designated for general business -
industrial and office research development in the future. The scale and intensity of
development should be similar to uses already existing along Elmhurst Road, and new
uses which are related to and supportive of existing activities should be encouraged.
Development areas are of sufficient size to allow for several larger, freestanding facilities,
or the clustering of numerous smaller buildings. Commercial development should be
guided by an overall site plan to ensure coordinated development of buildings, access
drives, internal circulation, and parking facilities. Screening and buffering should be
provided between this area and residential development recommended to the west.
Industrial and Office Research Areas
Industrial and office research development, as characterized by the Kensington Center
for Business, represents a significant land -use component within the Village. Several
land areas in the southwestern portion of the Village have potential for similar
development in the future. If carefully designed and developed, industrial and office
research uses could create a strong new identity for this area.
Principles and Standards
Several principles and standards should guide improvement and development of industrial
and office research areas within the Village:
"Planned" industrial and office research development should be encouraged wherever
possible to help ensure coordinated lot configuration, building design, access and parking,
and overall environmental features, as well as compatible relationships between new and
existing development.
Within industrial, and office research areas, individual sites should be reasonably level,
well -drained parcels of land capable of supporting large industrial facilities.
-16-
All industrial and office research areas should have direct access to a major arterial street,
but access roads should not disrupt the flow of traffic on the arterial.
Internal streets within industrial areas should be functional and easy to perceive and use.
Industrial and office,research areas should be designed to allow maximum flexibility, with
larger land areas capable of being subdivided and developed according to specific market
demand.
Individual lots should be relatively regular in size and shape, with depths greater than
widths.
Adequate water supply and waste disposal facilities should be available in all industrial
and office research areas.
Available resources should be used to encourage industrial and office/research
development.
Adequate off-street parking and loading facilities should be provided within all industrial
and office research areas. The consolidation of parking and loading facilities for two or
more individual uses should be encouraged.
Landscaping, lighting, and signage should be used to provide a visually pleasing environment
and help create a distinct image and identity for industrial and office research areas.
All industrial uses should be required to meet performance standards for noise, odor,
smoke, heat, air and water pollution, and other potentially harmful impacts.
Special care should be taken to screen and buffer industrial areas from other nearby
land-use areas and to ensure that industrial traffic and other related conditioners do not
adversely impact surrounding areas.
Plan RMmmendaligng
The Land-Use Plan differentiates between two basic types of industrial uses: light industrial
and office research activities, which could include a wide range of office, warehousing, and
light manufacturing uses; and general industrial activities, which would include heavy
industrial and manufacturing uses.
ht industrialloffice research activities would be concentrated in three primary areas:
(1) The Kensington Center area, situated between Rand Road and Wolf Road, just south
of Foundry Road. This area would be focused around the 300-acre Kensington Center
planned industrial park. Careful screening, buffering, and site design will be needed in
theses areas to ensure that new development is compatible with nearby residential areas.
(2) The area along the south side of METRA, both northwest and southeast of the
-17-
downtown area. Several smaller office and light industrial operations are already located
in this area, and these should be maintained and monitored to ensure continued
compatibility with adjoining residential areas. It is also recommended that the five -acre
triangular land parcel north of Central Road and east of Lancaster Street, which is
currently vacant, be developed for light industry in the future. Access to this parcel
should be from the south, and special screening and buffering should be used between
this area and the single-family neighborhood to the west.
(3) The soutbwestern portion of the Village, along Dempster and Algonquin Roads.
This area already includes the United Airlines Service and Training Center, the
Coca-Cola complex, and several smaller industrial and office research operations.
Several other vacant sites have excellent access and visibility characteristics and have
potential for similar development in the future. It is recommended that each of these
areas be developed as part of planned industrial subdivisions to help ensure quality
development and the most effective use of remaining available land. In total,
approximately 40 acres in this area could be developed for light industrial/office research
operations in the future.
General Industry would be limited to the far southwestern portion of the Village, generally
south of Algonquin Road. This area currently contains the large Mount Prospect Fuel
Storage Terminal and several smaller general industrial operations. It is recommended
that remaining vacant land be used for light industrial activities in the future. Existing
residential uses, including the mobile home park along Oakton and low -intensity commercial
uses, are not compatible with the industrial character of this area, and it is recommended
that these be phased out in the future to allow for more appropriate new development. As
in light industrial areas, new development should be in planned subdivisions to ensure
efficient and effective use of remaining land. In total, 106 acres could be made available
for general industry in this area.
Downtown
The Mount Prospect downtown area includes a wide mixture of retail, convenience
commercial, office, municipal, auto -oriented, and residential land -uses. The
Downtown -Development Plan, prepared in 1976 under the leadership of the Business
District Development and Redevelopment Commission, reviewed existing problem
conditions and future potentials, and presented a long-range plan for improvement and
redevelopment within the area.
The 1976 plan contains two primary components: The overall planning framework for
guiding downtown development and high priority planning projects which should be
undertaken in the short-term future. The planning framework provides overall guidelines
for long-range growth and development. It establishes basic standards and requirements
for key parts of the downtown environment, including land -use, movement systems, parking
areas, and pedestrian and open space facilities. Planning projects are more specific
development actions which should be undertaken to revitalize the downtown area.
-18-
The basic recommendations of the 1976 Downtown Plan have been reviewed and evaluated
as a part of the Comprehensive Plan update process. In general, these basic concepts have
been endorsed and reconfirmed. The overall land -use recommendations for downtown are
still valid and still appear to reflect local aspirations regarding the downtown area.
However, several changes have been made in this Comprehensive Plan.
The Comprehensive Plan organizes downtown into several compact land -use districts (see
Figure 1). Each district would be generally homogeneous in terms of intensity, scale,
character, and the relationship between pedestrian and vehicular movements. Each would
contain similar, compatible, and mutually supportive activities.
The system is anchored by two primary activity centers -- the office district/governmental
district and the mixed use--commercial/residential center— -- located east and west of Main
Street. These would be the most intensely developed parts of downtown. Primary vehicular
circulation would be around the periphery of these districts. Each would contain a compact
grouping of related activities focused around an interior pedestrian oriented environment.
Coordinated multi-purpose development would be encouraged within each area, with unified
parking areas, access points, pedestrian facilities, and beautification improvements. These
two primary centers would be surrounded by other land -use districts, including commercial
services, commuter facilities, and multi -family housing. These improvements have already
begun and should be continued.
The special characteristics of each land -use district are discussed below.
Office/Gove-m-m-ental District,
The office/governmental district should be strengthened and consolidated as a major
new activity center between Northwest Highway, Main, Central, and Maple Streets. It
should contain a range of governmental, professional, and other office activities, plus
parking and support services.
New office development, especially small professional, representing one of downtown's
most promising market opportunities, should be strongly promoted and recruited for this
area. Adequate -sites should be made available north of Busse on the east side of
Emerson. The District contains the new Police and Fire Headquarters constructed in
1992/1993. Commercial and office uses are being examined as potential redevelopment
for the highly visible frontage along Northwest Highway and Main Street.
Primary vehicular circulation should be located on the periphery of the district with
internal streets providing access to individual sites. New pedestrian facilities, landscaping,
and streetscape improvements should be emphasized.
Mixed Use - Residenil ZCommercial District
The Area bordered by Main, Central, and Northwest Highway should be strengthened
and improved as Mount Prospect's Town Center District. It is recognized that the
majority of any new commercial development should be focused in this triangle area.
-19-
r
O1V1tGLRYICES -- - -
---� SIDINTG �-
1 -
-Ni HB{�RH�IF
RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD
j AL
GENERALIZED LAND USES
f
LiLy
USE
-�-
EJgHB R 0b
CENTRAL RD
i- -
ES�DE
EIGoo-or
OOD
RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD
Primary uses in this area would be a mix of commercial and residential uses strengthened
by a strong, convenient, attractive and consumer oriented environment. However, since
market opportunities change or may be limited, development of this district must be
carefully phased.
Initial efforts should encourage the consolidation of commercial activities. Actions
should be undertaken which could strengthen and support existing businesses.
Residential units should be given greater emphasis in this district. The variety of
lifestyles should include new household formations as well as young adults, empty nesters
and senior housing options. New and improved short-term parking should be made
available both within and adjacent to this district. Sidewalk and pedestrian facilities
should be improved to encourage pedestrian movement and shopping within the area.
Strong connections should be created to link land -use areas to complement and support
town center activities. Landscaping, lighting, graphics, and other streetscape projects
should be utilized to visually unite the area. Building facades and storefront
improvements should be continued in order to improve the overall appearance of the
area. These improvements should be continued as resources permit.
As downtown development activity increases, commercial operations in other parts of
downtown should be encouraged to relocate within this district. A compact grouping of
commercial - retail and residential activities could work together as a unit and provide
mutual support, for each other. The group would generate a larger number of total
shopping trips and all stores could benefit.
As new office and housing development takes place, and the existing shopping environment
improves, opportunities for new retail and commercial development may arise. If so, new
commercial development should occur within this district. In the long-range, the district
should function as a small cluster of shopping facilities with primary vehicular circulation
around the periphery. Stores should be so oriented to create a small open -space area, and
with strong pedestrian connections across Main Street to new office and housing areas.
Prospect Avenue Cgmmercial District
Convenience commercial activities along Prospect Avenue south of the railroad have
developed as a relatively distinct district. This district provides important convenience
services to adjacent residents to the south. Existing businesses should be protected and
preserved as important central area economic assets. Improved parking areas, building
facade improvements, improved sidewalks and pedestrian facilities, and new landscaping
should be continued to complete the upgrade of the district's overall environment. Future
rigbt-of-way improvements should include the block from Route 83 (Main Street) to Wille
Street in order to complete the street and sidewalk and lighting improvements. Future
actions for private development should focus on maintaining the existing commercial and
service businesses.
-21-
New high-quality central area housing could add significant new life and vitality to the
downtown and help create a built-in market for commercial activities. It is critical that any
new housing around downtown be carefully monitored and controlled to ensure quality
development. Development should complement and be in keeping with adjacent
neighborhoods, with quality materials and construction and extensively landscaped and
buffered sites. The areas should provide for unique new housing opportunities not now
available in the Village.
Im Increment Finance Dist= and TriangleRedevelopment
A range of coordinated public and private actions will be required to revitalize the
downtown area and attract new investment. The creation of the fust Tax Increment Finance
District (TIF) adopted by the Village Board action in August, 1985 put in place one of the
primary tools required to carry out physical redevelopment and expansion of the economic
base of Mount Prospect.
In creating the TIF District, the Village took action to create the preconditions required
to attract new private investment. Future projects should focus on correcting key problems
which hamper downtown operations. These should include correcting blighting conditions
throughout the Downtown, which TIF and other studies have identified. Public projects
should improve vehicular access, relieve traffic congestion, and provide adequate and
convenient parking ;acilities. Public actions should also improve the overall image and
appearance of the area, and make the area more attractive and convenient for people. In
addition, the Village should also help make lands available for new activities and tailor new
zoning and regulatory measures to fit the special needs of a downtown center and thereby
directly encourage new private development. In the Fall of 1988, the TIF District was
expanded to include the majority of the block bounded by Central, Busse Avenue, Wille,
and Main Street as the first phase for potential commercial/residential redevelopment as
a part of the larger triangle bounded by Main, Central and Northwest Highway. The Tax
Increment Financing Boundary Map (Figure 2) identifies the specific areas in this district.
The Village has adopted development objectives which will serve as a guide for
redevelopment of these areas.
X 11x1100*WZI7t7 ► 1 ►t
Development Objective
1. Create an innovative development that encourages a suburban scale mixed use project,
that explores all market potentials, is harmonious with the surrounding residential area
and can attract residents of the Northwest Cook County area.
2. Create a development that can stimulate other private sector investment in the
triangle and adjoining areas, including new construction, expansion and rehabilitation.
3. Provide a development that can yield the highest possible real estate and sales tax to
fir►M
v VA'
J
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING
BOUNDARY MAP
d
MAI N
WS5,
Z 8'
oz.->
.1 R
Figure 2
- 23 -
sr
it
sr
Figure 2
- 23 -
the Village consistent with other downtown development objectives. A financial analysis
should be submitted so that revenue figures can be examined.
4. Protect and enhance the present retail and service businesses in the Downtown Area.
5. The redevelopment project shall serve to improve the image of the Downtown Area
recognizing its potential as the town center.
Land Use
1. A full range of retail and service commercial uses together with select professional
office space and residential should be encouraged. The concept of mixed commercial
and residential and/or office space should be examined.
2. Residential development may be multi -family units with a building height not to
exceed 6 stories.
3. Commercial development should focus on retail and service businesses. Specialty
shops and convenience commercial are to be encouraged. An anchor user should be
encouraged to attract a broad customer base to the redevelopment area.
4. Office space should be designed for professional office users.
5. A portion of the site should be dedicated to a centrally located public open space,
sufficient for gatherings and community activities. This should serve as a major focal
point in the Downtown Area.
6. A cultural arts facility should be encouraged.
Development Character
1. New construction should be compatible with the existing character in the downtown
area.
2. Taller buildings should be located in such fashion as to lessen the impact to
surrounding residential uses.
Design Guidelines
1. Provide attractive, well landscaped frontages along 411 public streets, and adequate
screening and buffering around parking and loading areas.
2. An integrated site plan should reflect no physical barriers between land uses.
3. Brick construction is preferred for all buildings. No exposed block walls should be
allowed on any building elevation.
-24-
4. The redevelopment area should include unified streetscape elements, including
lighting, benches, graphics and brick paver sidewalks. Signage should blend with the
development and complement its architectural character.
Parking
1. Sufficient off-street parking should be provided to meet the demand of the proposed
land uses.
2. Parking should be located in areas easily accessible from adjoining streets.
3. Parking should be assembled into unified lots or structures, with adequate provisions
for short-term customer parking and long-term employee parking.
4. Underground parking for residential units is encouraged.
5. The use of shared parking utilizing off-peak operating hours should be encouraged.
Pedestrian Movement
1. Pedestrian access and movement through the site should be an important part of the
plan. Public and private pedestrian sidewalks should be provided, and conflicts with
automobile traffic should be minimized on-site.
2. The redevelopments should provide direct pedestrian connections from the
redevelopment area to adjoining areas to encourage pedestrian movement to or from
other adjacent commercial areas.
Village Participation
1. The Village owns the 2.26 acre site on Pine Street. The municipality should consider
flexible and innovative methods to convey this parcel to the selected developer.
2. The municipality should consider economic incentives proposed by the selected
developer.
3. The Village should consider appropriate use of condemnation and land clearance of
properties in order to implement redevelopment.
4. Vacation of existing public streets and alleys may be considered for the appropriate
plan.
5. The Village may assemble property to the extent feasible.
Primary among sites being considered for redevelopment is the former Public Works
Garage on Pine Street together with adjacent associated properties and the north half of the
block bounded by Main, Wille, Central and Busse Avenue.
-25-
I SM
Downtown improvement projects outlined for action in the 1976 Downtown Plan and the
Comprehensive Plan of 1981 that should be undertaken include:
Prospect Avenue, Main to Wille
Emerson - Northwest Hwy. to Busse
Brick sidewalks, street trees, street lights,
benches, curb, gutter and street
resurfacing
Brick sidewalks, street trees, street lights
2. Facade Improvement Program - To date, over sixty-five storefronts have been
improved through use of HUD Block Grant Program, Village local funds and private
property owners. Architectural design services were provided by a private consultant at
no cost to the property owner. The program has been administered by the Business
District Development and Redevelopment Commission and Economic Development
Coordinator. Facade improvements should be continued in the downtown and all along
Northwest Highway.
3. Lgrid ASsemblagei - The expanded TIF area west of Main Street (Route 83)
should be purchased by the Village and its preferred developer in a coordinated manner.
Acquisition in the TIF development sites is a high priority of the Village.
4. Police and Eire Headqugler3 - A new Police and Fire Headquarters is being erected on
the present site at the Northwest corner of Maple and Northwest Highway providing up-
to-date space for fire and police activities, including administration and fire prevention.
Once completed in 1993, the old Public Works Garage facility on Pine Street between
Central and Northwest Highway will become available for redevelopment as part of a
larger program being considered by the Village.
Development Incgntives,The Village should continue to play a major role in stimulating
new development. Downtown beautification projects have helped stimulate interest in the
broader scope projects of redevelopment aided by Tax Increment Financing.
-26-
Public and Semi -Public Areas
Public and semi-public land areas, including public and private schools, municipal facilities
and churches are distributed throughout the Village. Most of these are in good condition
and are well located to serve the community. Park and recreational areas are also scattered
throughout the community. In general, most areas are adequately served by park land,
although several deficiencies do exist, and not all park sites are yet fully developed. The
park districts serving Mount Prospect were surveyed and none indicated any areas that are
inadequately served by park land. Recommendations for additional park facilities are
included in the Community Facilities Section.
The Village also has several other public land resources. Cook County Forest Preserve land
borders the Village on the northeast and is a significant visual and recreational resource
available to Village residents. Additionally, there are numerous golf courses in and adjacent
to the Village and several others within a short driving distance.
Recommendations related to public and semi-public areas are included in the Community
Facilities section of the Comprehensive Plan.
TRANSPORTATION
The Village should continue to develop plans for mass transportation and traffic circulation.
The transportation system consists of various categories of streets, parking facilities, and
public transit services. The overall system provides for access to Mount Prospect from the
surrounding area and movement of people and vehicles within and around the Village.
The efficiency and convenience of this system significantly affects the quality of life within
the community.
This section presents recommendations for improvement of the thoroughfare system (see
Figure 3). Recommendations are based on review of available information on the physical
characteristics of the existing transportation and traffic data, observations of the impact of
traffic volumes and patterns on the existing street system, and application of accepted
transportation and traffic planning principles and standards. Recommendations have not
been included for changes in mass transportation service to and within the community, since
a thorough analysis of needs has not been undertaken at this time.
Functional
The major street system in Mount Prospect is well defined, but little hierarchy is apparent
on certain other streets in the Village. A functional classification of all streets is a necessary
step in identifying problem areas and prescribing improvements.
Streets and related traffic control devices must all be considered as elements of an
inter -related system. This approach requires that the decision to install traffic engineering
measures (e.g., street closure, left turn restrictions, traffic signals, etc.) be considered in
terms of their impact on adjacent streets, intersections, and neighborhoods. Without a
-27-
THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS],
,-I-
- ------------- - //-
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
YAjOR A=77RIAL
ussms*mmvssv* SECONDARY ARTFRWL
C01 I
., --FCTCR STREET
systematic approach to this problem, the result is a mixture of traffic control devices, policies
and operational practices which creates confusion, inconvenience, accidents, and a myriad
of other secondary problems.
The currently accepted approach to "sorting out" the complex inter -relationship between
these elements is first to classify each street in the Village according to the function it
should perform. Each street should fit into a category or functional classification. Decisions
regarding traffic control devices and restrictive measures can then be prescribed in a
relatively straightforward manner to assure that the functions are achieved. In addition, this
procedure permits the identification of deficiencies in the street system and facilitates the
analysis of street system needs.
Four separate street classifications are identified below. The titles given these classifications
describe the orientation of traffic expected to use the streets.
Major Arterial Streets
A major arterial street is intended to serve vehicle trips oriented beyond the Village
boundaries and adjacent communities. The section of the street within the Village should
serve a significant portion of trips generated by land -uses within the Village. This type of
street has regional importance because of its alignment, continuity, capacity, and its
connection with other regional traffic carriers.
Secondary Arterial Streets
A secondary arterial street is intended to serve vehicle trips generated by land -uses within
the Village and within adjacent communities. This type of street should not serve
long-distance trips (i.e., greater than five miles), but has community importance in terms
of traffic capacity and serving abutting land -use.
Collector Streets
A collector street is intended to serve only vehicle trips generated to and from the
neighborhood it serves. The function of this type of street is to collect and distribute traffic
between the neighborhoods and community and regional streets.
Local Streets
All other streets within the Village could be classified as local streets. A local street is
intended to serve only vehicle trips generated by land -use abutting the street. The function
of this type of street is local access within a neighborhood.
One of the primary benefits derived from creating a functionally classified street system is
that it is then possible to designate "neighborhoods" inside the areas of the network of
major and secondary arterial streets. If these streets are properly designed with adequate
capacity and proper traffic control devices, the traffic in the neighborhood "cells" can be
controlled to exclude through traffic.
-29-
In determining the functional classification of streets within the Village, the following factors
were considered:
Length which the street extends continuously beyond the Village boundaries.
Width of pavement.
Type and density of abutting land -use.
Spacing relative to the prevailing grid network of streets in the surrounding communities.
The functional classification of the proposed street system is presented in Table 1. In
general, the desired design characteristics for the streets should reflect these classifications.
The major arterial streets should have the highest design standards (normally four -lane
divided roadways with separate turn lanes at intersections) and should have priority in
terms of traffic control over the other streets in the system. The secondary arterial streets
also require high design standards and should usually have four lanes for travel. A median
may be necessary on some community streets if the volume of traffic is anticipated to be
significant because of the intensity of abutting development or the condition of parallel
streets. Collector streets will usually provide satisfactory service as two-lane facilities unless
they provide primary access to'high traffic generating land -uses.
-30-
TABLE I
Functional Classification of Area Streets
Classification Street
Major Arterial Algonquin Road
Central Road
Des Plaines/River Road
Elmhurst Road/Main Street
Euclid Avenue
Golf Road
Northwest Highway
Oakton Street
Rand Road
Wolf Road
Secondary Arterial Busse Road
Camp McDonald Road
Dempster Street
Kensington Road.
Mount Prospect Road
Collector Arthur Street
Burning Bush Lane (from Seminole to Kensington
Road)
Business Center Drive
Cardinal Lane (from Eric to Westgate)
Council Trail
Elmhurst Ave. (from Central to Kensington)
Emerson (from Golf to Central)
Feehanville Drive
Goebbert Road (from Algonquin to Goff)
Gregory Street (east to Owen Street)
Huntington Commons Dr. (from Elmhurst to I-Inneman)
Lincoln Street
Linneman Road
Loanquist (east to Emerson)
Meier Road
Owen Street (from Central to Gregory)
Prospect Avenue
Schoenbeck Road (from Rand to Camp McDonald)
See-Gwun Avenue
Seminole Lane
Westgate (from Cardinal Lane to Central)
Westgate Road (from Kensington Road to Euclid)
Wheeling Road (from Kensington Road to Rand
William Street (from Golf to Prospect)
Willow Lane
-31-
Problems and Issues
Several transportation related features within Mount Prospect have been identified as
needing improvement, including problem intersections, localized traffic congestion, street
discontinuities, community oriented mass transportation, and parking.
Problem Intersections
Several intersections within the Village are characterized by traffic operational problems.
Intersectional problems exist where north -south major arterial streets intersect with east -west
major arterial streets and where Rand Road and Northwest Highway intersect with
north -south and east -west major arterial streets. The most serious problems exist at the
Northwest Highway intersection with Main Street, Rand Road intersection with Kensington
Road and Elmhurst Road, and at the Mount Prospect Road intersection with Rand and
Central . Roads.
Traffic Congestion
Peak -hour traffic is quite heavy on several street segments in Mount Prospect, and certain
operational problems along these streets are resulting in congestion. Although all major
and secondary arterial streets carry heavy traffic volumes, the commercial corridor streets
of Rand Road, Northwest Highway and Elmhurst Road need traffic operational
improvements to reduce conflicts between different types of traffic and to adequately serve
peak -hour volumes.
Street Discontinuity
Several important streets in Mount Prospect either lack continuity in alignment or are not
fully improved to facilitate efficient traffic flow. Busse Road carries heavy traffic volumes
from the Village limits on the south to Central Road on the north. Although this street
functions as a secondary arterial for its entire length within the Village, only the section
of street south of Golf Road has been upgraded to four lane design standard. The
upgrading of the section of Busse Road between Golf and Central, and Mount Prospect
Road between Northwest HIghway and Central Road should be top priorities.
Through Traffic on Local Streets
A local street is intended only to serve vehicle trips generated by land -use abutting the
street and by circulation from adjacent local streets. The use of local streets by through
traffic is a problem condition in the greater central section of the community where a
uniform grid pattern of streets exist in the immediate vicinity of principal intersections.
During peak traffic periods, through traffic will use local streets to bypass congested
intersections.
-32-
Mass Transportation
The Village is served by PACE, a regional bus line and by the METRA Railway commuter
service. PACE Bus Lines serve Randhurst Shopping Center, Mount Prospect Train
Station, Downtown Des Plaines, Roosevelt University, Woodfield Mall, United Air Lines
Headquarters, Harper College and other destinations. Although rail service in Mount
Prospect is good, it has some negative effects. Train activity at the many at -grade crossings
disrupts traffic flow on the arterial system. This is most prevalent during the morning and
evening peak traffic periods when both vehicular volumes and train activity are at their
highest.
Parking
Provision of parking to service businesses is of greatest concern in the downtown area
where patrons, employees, and commuters all compete for available spaces. In general,
downtown does not have an overall coordinated parking system. Parking is also a problem
along the built-up sections of Northwest Highway where numerous small, inefficient parking
facilities have been provided by business establishments on a scattered basis.
Bicycle Routes
Currently the Village has a variety of existing and planned bikeway facilities. In the
southern portion of the Village, along the east -west section of the Commonwealth Edison
Right -of -Way, there is an off-street bike path which is approximately a mile and
three-quarter long. An eight (8) mile on -street bike route spans from the northeast corner
of the Village to the southwest corner connecting Prospect Heights with Des Plaines. The
route intersects the Central Business District, and ties together most of the major civic,
shopping and park facilities.
There are various improvements that could be implemented on current bicycle route
facilities. Bicycle racks in the Central Business District need better distribution to allow for
safe bicycle lock-up throughout the downtown area.
Recommended Street System Modifications
The major traffic movement problems within Mount Prospect are related to the overall
system of streets serving the community, the operational characteristics and constraints of
the major arterial streets, the discontinuity of community arterials, and the type of
intersection traffic control in use on the community arterials. Recommendations to alleviate
these problems are summarized below.
Several streets previously identified as collector streets should be reclassified as local streets.
These include Highland Street, Westgate Road (south of Kensington Center), Lonnquist
Boulevard (east of Emerson Street), and Gregory Street (from Owen Street to Rand).
These streets lack continuity and direct connection to either major or secondary arterial
streets.
-33-
THE VILLAGE OF
'MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS L;
r R ti• a� �1
NIS �2rN°'
.t
+, Fir�
7
'o coo
r �
—�—<
gjry�
1 Cw r r^ r
'
i
,Y'"ter
T r,�,_._a .,�'q%�.TL � �i.r.Cp�CpC ' .. y-�..��r�
TiMY6l 6T'M�,,,,•
�}' re Oaf pftr
WSSE AVE ,t # 1% �i,U �''.:.. � -� f�s�>r loft»
T 2 f r� 1183
fff
ro u+c" sr
17-4
Ta
,OraoW ewo i r l
o.
fa A
t + {{;, • � ��'4,,,,,,0 ,. ., Why �/+�
..w i"
-N" I -.r F"figure 4
I It34
erg ROUTES PONIJNOU
10
CWWT AL
Busse Road from Golf Road to Central Road, and Mount Prospect Road from Central
to Northwest Highway should be upgraded to four lanes. Implementation of this
intermediate improvement will provide the Village with an improved and increased
capacity roadway between the northern and southern sections of the Village, and provide
traffic, not destined for the Village, with an alternate route for north -south movement.
Meier Road should function as a collector street serving the west side neighborhood in
the Village. This street is currently terminated mid -way between Lincoln Street and
Central Road. The construction of a roadway extension to collector street standards
from the current point of termination to Central Road is recommended.
Business Center Drive between Wolf Road and Rand Road will serve as a major access
road within the Kensington Center area and should be classified as collector street.
Feehanville Drive should also be considered as a major access road.
In general, the intersections of arterial streets should include separate left -tum lanes, and
where warranted a separate traffic signal phase.
All non -local streets should be upgraded to a uniform width along their entire length,
wherever feasible.
COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Community facilities and services are important parts of the Mount Prospect community.
They provide for many of the day-to-day needs of local residents. They include services
which affect the health, safety and well-being of area residents, businesses, and institutions.
Some are an absolute necessity, while others are highly desirable. It is critical that these
be adequately and effectively provided for in the future.
This chapter reviews existing community facilities located within the Village, summarizes
key issues involved in planning for the future, and presents the recommended Community
Facilities Plan (see Figure 5).
Parks and Recreational Facilities
The parks and recreational system consists of sites, facilities, and programs which perform
several important functions. The most basic function is the provision of recreational services
to local residents; and effective system can create opportunities for a wide range of leisure
time experiences. The system can also help define and delineate neighborhood areas, and
be an important visual feature in the community. An effective parks and recreation system
is particularly important in a traditionally strong residential community like Mount Prospect.
Existing Facilities
Mount Prospect is primarily served by two park districts. The Mount Prospect District,
which serves the area between Kensington, Touhy, Mount Prospect Road, and Meier Road;
and the River Trails Park District, which serves the area between Palatine, Kensington,
-35-
THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
FIGURE 5
- 36 -
Wheeling, and River Road. The Mount Prospect Park District operates 28 park sites of
which 21 are within Village boundaries. River Trails Park District operates 7 parks in
Mount Prospect. In addition, in Mount Prospect, the Prospect Heights Park District
maintains two park sites, and the Des Plaines Park District maintains one park site. The
total acreage of parks within Mount Prospect is approximately 502 acres. Table 2 indicates
all current park sites within the Village. Residents living in the far western portion of the
Village are served by the Arlington Heights Park District, although this district has no sites
within Mount Prospect. The Commonwealth Edison easement on the southwest side of the
Village is now maintained for recreation purposes by the Mount Prospect Park District
under a lease agreement. The Park District is also operating recreational facilities on
MWRD property on West Central Road. Known as Melas Park, the 70 acre tract is
operating jointly with adjacent Arlington Heights Park District on a 20 year lease. To date,
approximately 12 to 15 acres have been developed for recreation.
In many communities, public schools also play an important role in providing local
recreational services. School grounds are often available to surrounding residents for active
recreation. Of the total 32 parks in Mount Prospect, five are located adjacent to public
schools.
Cook County Forest Preserve land, which represents a valuable asset for the Village, is
located to the south and west of the community, and east of River Road. While forest
preserves contain few developed facilities, the wooded areas, trails and bicycle paths provide
a number of leisure time services.
In addition to the public recreational resources, private recreational facilities also play a key
role in Mount Prospect. The Village contains numerous privately operated swimming pools,
tennis courts, club rooms, and playgrounds which help supplement the public system.
Recommended Improvements
In order to maintain its tradition as a strong residential community, Mount Prospect should
strive to maintain quality park and recreational services. While the existing system of sites
and facilities is generally very good, certain improvements should be made in the future.
For instance, Lions Park should be more oriented toward entertainment for adults. Site
options should also be developed to include a bandshell, .cultural arts center, nature center
and garden.
Since there are few remaining vacant land parcels suitable for recreation, the existing park
system must be used most effectively. The use of certain existing parks should . be
intensified. New facilities should be developed on existing sites and program offerings could
be expanded. In particular, consideration should be given to the expressed need for teen
and adult social centers.
More extensive use might also be made of public school sites and facilities. The Mount
Prospect Park District has expressed the desire to utilize school facilities more extensively
in the future, especially gymnasiums for day -time recreation programs. The district has
received grants to purchase school sites in the district and should continue to purchase
-37-
Table 2
EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATIONAL AREAS IN MOUNT PROSPECT
Activilics and Facilities
Name Location Park Type Site Playground Ballfield Basketball Tennis Swimming Shelter Community Passive fee Bike Football Golf Open
Size Center Rea Skating Path Course Space
(Acres)
and
Paths
MSaml Prospect Park District
X
Busse
Owen and Henry Neighborhood
7.12
X
X
X
Clearwater
Golf and Busse Community
18.11
` X
X
4 X
Countryside
South Emerson Street Neighborhood
2.70
X
X
Emerson
Gregory & Emerson Neighborhood
2.30
X
x
Fairview'
Gregory & Fairview Neighborhood
3.00
X
X
Kopp/Rec. Plex
Dempster West of Hwy. 83Community
27.04
X
2
X X X
Lions Memorial'
411 South Maple Community
24.70
X
2
X 8 X X
Meadows
Northwest Hwy.& Gregory Community
17.00
X
3
X X
Mt. Prospect Golf Course
and Comm. Cir.
Shabonee, W. of Hwy 83 Urban
115.00
x x
Owens
Busse and Owens Neighborhood
2.30
X
X
Prospect Meadows
Forest and Euclid Neighborhood
3.50
X
X
X X
Robert Frost'
Linneman Rd. & Frost Dr.Neighborhood
3.00
X
X
Sunrise
Lonnquisl & Louis Neighborhood
11.00
X
X
Sunset
Lonnquist & Wapella Neighborhood
7.00
X
X
Wego
Lancaster & Wego Trail Neighborhood
1.30
X
X
Weiler Creek
Weller Cr & Council Tr Neighborhood
12.00
X
X
'Park and School
2Proposed
3Administrative Offices
!Cross Country Skiing
X
X
X
X
X
X X2
X
X X
X
X X
X,
x
X
X X
X
X
X
x
X
X
X
X
X
Table 2 (com'd)
EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATIONAL AREAS IN MOUNT PROSPECT
River Trails Park D strict
tic{it}o AU FacFtaics
Name
Location
Park Type
Site
Playground Ballfield
Basketball Tennis Swimming Shelter Community Passive
Ice Bike Football Golf Open
X
2 X X X X
Burning Bush Trails'
sizeCenter
Neighborhood
Ree.
Skating Path Course Space
2
3
4 X X
(Acres)
Wolf & Kensington
Neighborhood
.and
X
X
X
4 X X X
Tamarack Trails
Burning Bush/Kensington Neighborhood
Paths
Commonwealth Edison
South Comm. Ed. ROW
Community
78.70
X X
Wolf & Euclid
X X
Hill Street
Hili near Rand
Nature Trail
2.2
X
X
X
WesiBrook'
Central and Welter
Neighborhood
1.0
X X
X
Maple Trails
Gregory
Gregory and Rand
Neighborhood
8.0
X
Mclas
Central and Busse
Community
70.0
X
X
X
River Trails Park D strict
Aspen Trails
Maya & Burning Bush
Neighborhood
4.00
X
2
X
2 X X X X
Burning Bush Trails'
Burning Bush & Euclid
Neighborhood
10.00
X
2
3
4 X X
Sycamore Trails
Wolf & Kensington
Neighborhood
9.30
X
X
X
4 X X X
Tamarack Trails
Burning Bush/Kensington Neighborhood
4.90
X
X
X
2 X
Woodland Trails
Wolf & Euclid
Community
48.30
X
X
X
X X X X X
Evergreen Trails
Boxwood & Dogwood
Neighborhood
0.43
X
X
X
Maple Trails
Feehanville & Business
Commercial/
Des Plaine Park Digtict
Center Drive
Neighborhood
2.00
X
X
X X X X
Blued Park
Thayer & Horner
Neighborhood
4.22
X
2
X
X
Prosoect Heigh i Park Di.#rig
East Wedgewood Park
Oxford Street
Ptaylot
0.50
X
West Wedgewood Park
Rand Road
Neighborhood
1.50
X
X
'Park and School
unused and under-utilized properties. It is strongly recommended that playground and
recreational areas be maintained for public use at school sites recently closed or to be
closed in the future. Even if certain of these schools are reused for non-public activities
in the future, small park sites should be retained.
Other existing land resources with recreational potential should continue to be exploited.
The Commonwealth Edison easement which in the southwestern portion of the Village, is
providing new recreational opportunities for the large-scale multi -family development in this
area.
Finally, the acquisition by park districts of small new park sites in the future should be
considered to help offset park deficiencies in certain areas. The following sites have been
identified as possible future park sites:
A small three -acre site at the northwest corner of Elmhurst and Euclid which is currently
Village owned. A small park in this location could help serve multi -family development
around the country club, if not used for low density multi -family housing similar to that
on Wimbolton Drive.
Any new significant multi -family development should include the provision of new public
park land. The area between Algonquin and Dempster, should include a small five -acre
park site in the future.
Schools
Schools are among the most critical public facilities, especially in predominantly residential
communities such as Mount Prospect. They not only provide educational services, but also
play key cultural, recreational and social roles in residential neighborhoods.
Conditions have begun to change in local school districts during the past few years, and the
implications of these changes must be considered in the planning and community
development program.
Existing Facilities
Mount Prospect is served by four elementary school districts (Wheeling Township District
No. 21, River Trails School District No. 26, School District No. 57, and School District
No. 59), one public high school, district (Township High School District 214), and five
parochial schools. A detailed inventory of all schools located within the Village is presented
in Table 3. Schools Districts 25 and 23 also serve small portions of the Village, although
they have no school sites in Mount Prospect.
Trends in Local School Districts
Conditions within each of the public school districts serving the Village are similar. School
buildings themselves are in very good structural condition. However, some building
improvements or additions may be needed in the near future to accommodate new
-40-
Table 3
INVENTORY OF SCHOOLS IN MOUNT PROSPECT
'Adjacent to Park District land
Remaining
Available -
Number
Adequacy
Location to
Capa- Adequacy
Adequacy
Quality
Useful
Site
Recreation
of
Current
of
Regulation
bility of
of Off-
of
Dale
Building
Life
Size
Area
Class-
Enroll-
School
Site
to Service
for Recreational
Street
Environ -
Name
Built
Condition
(Years)
(Acres)
(Acres)
rooms
ment
Capacity
Size
Area
Expansion Area
Parking
ment
Township Hieh Scb
id D`grki 214
Prospect H. S.
1957
Good
26
60
20
92
1,557
2,500
Adequate
Excellent
Good Good
Good
Excellent
Rimer Trail: Schur
Distrier No 26
Euclid
1962 ,1991
Excellent
30
8.5
7.7
21
433
550
Excellent
Very Good
Very Good. Very Good
Very Good
Good
Indian Grove
1964, 1965,
Very Good
25
8.8
8.0
20
399
550
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent Excellent
Good
Excellent
1971, 1991
River Trails
1%5,1967
Very Good
30
8.0
6.2
34
627
750
Good
Very Good
Good Very Good
Very Good
Excellent
Middle School
1972, 1991
t Nipper
1974
Excellent
40
5.0
4.3
Open Space
75
125
Excellent
Excellent
Fair Very Good
Very Good
Good
Vacant Lot
r
Undeveloped
3.3
t
Si'hool District No.
Fairview
57 tElementilal
1952, 1955
Good
30
6.36
,
5.01
22
322
450
Adequate
Goad
Good Adequate
Adequate
Good
1958, 1973
Lions Park
1955, 1958, 1%2
Very Good
40
2.85
1.01
25
342
450
Adequate
Good
Poor Excellent
Adequate
Good
Westbrook
1%3, 1969
Very Good
40
11.05
9.0
25
314
450
Adequate
Good
Good Adequate
Adequate
Good
Lincoln
1949, 1953, 1956
Very Hood
40
19.38
16.0
41
506
750
Adequate
Good
Good Adequate
Adequate
Good
1960, 1970, 1991
Si l Disiti[l No,
21 fElcmcntarvl
1%1
Excellent
80
6.0
5
30
623
708
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good Very Good
Very Good
VexyGood
Robert Frost
'Adjacent to Park District land
Table 3 (coni'd)
INVENTORY OF SCHOOLS IN MOUNT PROSPECT
Private Schools
St. Emily Catholic
1961
Excellent
Remaining
11.2
Available
Number
437
800
Adequacy
Location in
Cap;-
Adequacy
A equacy
Qu ty
1955, 1957
Excellent
50
Useful
Site
Recreation
of
Current
Good
of
Regulation
bility
of
of Off.
of
- Name
Date
Built
BuildingLife
17-20
Size
Area
Class-
Enroll-
School
Site
to Service
(or
Recreational
Street
Environ-
Excellent
70
Condition
{Years)
{Acres)
(Acres)
rooms
mem
Capacity
Size
Area
Expansion Area
Parking
mem
erh.,.,t 026cl No
59'ElcmcntaU)
50
24
571
1,250
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Catholic School
Forest View
1962
Very Good
So
11.31
9
21
343
550
Excellent
Very Good
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Robert Frost
1%4, 1987
Very Good
So
3.75
2
18
310
450
Good
Excellent
Good
Good
Good
Good
John Jay
1967
Very Good
50
6.1
4
18
432
550
Good
Excellent
Good
Very Good
Good
Very Good
Holmes Junior
High School
1966
Very Good
50
5.3
3
27
575
700
Good
Excellent
Excellent
Good
Good
Excellent
Private Schools
St. Emily Catholic
1961
Excellent
50
11.2
1.6
24
437
800
Very Good
Very Good
Very Good Very Good
Very Good
Very Good
St. Alphonsus
Catholic School
1955, 1957
Excellent
50
20.0
8
10
220
350
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
St. John Lutheran
1973
Excellent
50
17-20
10
Open Area 75
125
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
St. Paul Lutheran
1990
Excellent
70
12
281
330
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
Excellent
St. Raymond
1953, 1954
Excellent
50
24
571
1,250
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Good
Catholic School
1957
Christian Life College
1963, 1997
Gond
40
14,9
13.0
13
Closed
Winona Photo School
1975
Very Good
40
15
10
3
1800 yr.
2900 yr.
Adequate
Good
Good
Adequate
Adequate
Good
programs and/or increased enrollment. School facilities are generally well distributed
throughout the Village, and most neighborhoods are within convenient distance of an
elementary school. Enrollment in most districts has been growing slightly.
It is essential that the Village keep abreast of development within each district and
cooperate with district officials to ensure continued high quality educational services. The
Village should work with district officials to find viable new uses for vacant school facilities
which can be of maximum benefit to the community. Similarly, school boards should be
encouraged to consider the re -use of vacant schools for public use, rather than sale for
private use, which may be in harmony with the surrounding area.
As indicated in the Land -Use Plan, it would be most desirable to retain both the land and
buildings of vacant schools as a public use. Other communities have successfully
transformed schools into community centers, cultural facilities, special educational centers,
or offices for municipal or other governmental agencies.Examples of reuse potentials are
summarized below.
Christian Life College This property was closed by Elementary School District 57
because of declining enrollments in the District and has since been purchased by
Christian Life Church. The Park District purchased approximately seven acres of this site
for open space/recreation purposes.
Park —View of was closed by River Trails School District 26 because of declining
enrollments in the district. The school facility, constructed in 1966, is in good structural
condition and is located on a 7.3 -acre site. The school is currently being used as a
Montessori School and for administrative offices and bus maintenance for School District
26. It should continue to be used for school use.
Busse School; This facility is owned by the Mount Prospect Park District which now rents
the facility to the Creative Children's Academy and the Suzuki School of Music.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FACILITIES AND UTILITIES
Fire Department
The Mount Prospect Fire Department has a Class II rating and a combination force
consisting of 66 uniformed firefighters, 32 of whom are also paramedics. They are
supplemented by 20 on-call volunteers. The Department maintains six pumpers, one ladder
truck, two squad vehicles, one chemical fire fighting unit, four ambulances and a disaster
services vehicle. Replacement for the equipment is based on a 20 -year plan. The Village's
Emergency Services Disaster Program is administered through the Fire Department.
The Fire Department normally maintains three facilities: Station No. 13, which serves as
the headquarters, is located at 112 East Northwest Highway; Station No. 12, at 1601 West
Golf Road; and Station No. 14, at 2000 East Kensington. Station No. 1 has been
demolished and will be replaced with a new, expanded, state of the art facility at the same
location. The new building should be up and operational in 1993. All existing fire station
-43-
facilities are in good condition. In addition, department officials indicate that two additional
stalls for vehicle maintenance activities would be desirable at Station No. 14 (see Table 4).
Existing fire stations provide adequate protection coverage for the Village at the present
time: However, the Village should continue to monitor conditions in high-value commercial
and industrial areas. It is recommended that a fourth facility be built in the northwest area
of the Village to adequately respond to potential calls from the Randhurst Shopping Center
and Kensington Center areas. The station should be near the intersection of Rand Road
and Kensington Road. Similarly, when significant new office and industrial development
occurs in the southwestern portion of the Village, station relocation or construction may also
become desirable in this area. Adequate sites could be made available.
Police Department
The Village of -Mount Prospect Police Department currently employs 100 persons, including
70 sworn personnel and 30 civilians.
A new Police and Fire Headquarters is being built on the same site as the prior building
and will serve all the needs of the Departments.
This department now maintains a staff of SS full time employees, 27 part-time employees
(this includes seasonal part-time employees), and is responsible for maintaining public
grounds, buildings and properties within the Village. The department also maintains all
Village vehicles, except for the Fire Department, which maintains its own.
The Village has constructed a new Public Works facility at the Melas Park site on Central
Road. This facility was planned to meet the long-range Public Work needs of the Village.
The water tower, if feasible and necessary, should also be moved to Melas Park.
Village Administrative C?£fices
Most Village administrative offices are located in the Village Hall at 100 South Emerson.
Although this facility is in good structural condition, and is adequate in terms of overall
size, certain internal operational problems do exist. Several offices and departments which
would operate most efficiently in close proximity are now physically separated. For example,
the Planning Department and Engineering Division, which often require close working
relationships, are now located on different floors. Several other offices which could benefit
from close proximity are also currently separated. However, Village officials feel that
internal space reorganization and reallocation could improve operations but will not
eliminate space needs.
Public UbEgjy
The Mount Prospect Public Library, whose service area is coterminous with Village
boundaries, has been a tax supported institution since 1943. The present facility, located
-44-
Table 4
INVF.NPORY OF EXISLLNG PUBLIC BUILDINGS IN MOUNT' PROSPECP
Remaining
4
to
I's
Date Building
Useful
Site
Sire
Location
Parting
— Name
Building Function
Built
Life (yrs)
Sias
Adequate
Satisfactory
Adequate
CmmeaYa
Public Safety Building
Police and Fire headquarters
Under
1.03y
Yes
Planned for occupancy by Police and Fire
Fire Station No. t3
Construction
Departmeats in 1991
Fire Station No. 12
Housing for equipment and manpower
1964 Good
Infinite
.88
Yes
Yes
Yes
Fare Station No. 14
Housing for equipment and manpower
1967 Good
Infinite
.78
No
Yes
Yes
More stalls needed for vehicle maintenance
Public Works
Offices, equipment, and material
19 Excellent
Infinite
7.00
Yes
Yes
Yes
Headquarters
storage
Mount Prospect Library
t
Library services
1976 Excellent
30
2.34
Yes
Yes
Yes
,p Village Hall
Village administrative offices
Good
10
.78
Yes
Yes
Yes
Some offices should be located in closer prow
tr
mity to others
t
Senior Citizen Center
Administrative offices, senior
1950 Good
10
.76
Yes
Yes
Yes
citizen facilities; Health
Department on 2nd Floor
at 10 South Emerson, was built in 1976 and is in good condition. Operation and
administration of the library is governed by a seven -member board of elected officials.
Currently 243,485 volumes are maintained in the Mount Prospect Public Library. The
American Library Association's minimum recommended standard is 3,500 volumes per
1,000 population. Mount Prospect has 4,576 volumes per 1,000 in population.
In addition to providing traditional library services, it also provides audio-visual software
and hardware, adult education programs, tours, bus trips and feature length films for adults
and children, talking books for the blind and physically handicapped, a Telecommunications
Devise for the Deaf (TDD) for the hearing impaired, consumer education information, and
reading room facilities.
t.
Human Senices Division
The Human Services Division offices are in the Senior Citizen Center, located at the
northwest comer of Busse and Emerson. The building, which previously housed the Mount
Prospect Library, was recently remodelled and is now in good condition. The senior citizen
facility's administration offices, meeting rooms and support facilities are located on the first
floor, with Village Cable Television offices on the second floor. The facility is adequate but
a small addition was determined to be needed in fiscal year 1992 to add needed office
space. However, the Village should closely monitor changing local social and demographic
characteristics to ensure that special needs of our residents, especially the elderly, disabled,
disadvantaged and low income continue to be provided for in the future.
Public Utilities
The public utility systems serving the Village are generally good, and no serious deficiencies
have been identified. However, as growth and development continue, it is essential that
utility needs continue to be adequately met in the future.
Water Sy5te
The Village operated water system obtains all of its water from Lake Michigan. Prior to
1986, its source for water was wells. Some wells may be kept to provide a reserve source
of water. Even with Lake Michigan water, the Village has had to continue to enforce its
ordinance restricting the use of water because of Illinois Department of Transportation,
Division of Waterways requirements.
Citizen Utilities provides water and sewer services to 3,572 households in the northeastern
section of the Village.
Sewer System
The need for storm sewer improvements in certain areas of the Village have been identified
by the Village and were confirmed by a private engineering firm in 1990. Plans have been
prepared and adopted for correcting many of these problems.
-46-
The existing sewer system throughout the Village, including both sanitary and storm sewer
facilities, is owned by two utility districts. The separate districts are Citizens Utilities and
the Village of Mount Prospect. Treatment of effluence from the sanitary sewers occurs in
a treatment plant located near Oakton and Elmhurst and also a plant in Stickney, Illinois.
Citizen Utilities stormwater and sanitary sewers are totally separated, whereas, Mount
Prospect has approximately one-third of their sewers on a combined system.
Retention ponds and creeks throughout the Village provide an additional source of drainage
of storm water during heavy rainfall periods. Flooding and infiltration into the sanitary
system occurs during heavy rainfall periods. Occasionally during exceptional heavy rainfall,
the Des Plaines River also overflows into this area.
In order to alleviate this problem in the near future, the Metropolitan Water Reclamation
District (MWRD) recently completed a deep tunnel for increased storm water. flows and
capacity. Additional needed improvements include the rehabilitation of sewers where
infiltration of storm water is an on-going problem. It is also recommended that as
development occurs on the perimeter of the Village and on currently undeveloped land
within the community, appropriate storm and sanitary sewers along with retention facilities
be constructed in order to alleviate future problems.
fiffi7
Street lighting throughout the Village is currently limited to light fixtures on utility poles
along major thoroughfares and residential streets. Street lighting is installed in new
developments as required by the Development Code. In areas where the Village identifies
street lighting as deficient, such areas should be upgraded to current standards.
IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
This Chapter presents the key elements of an overall program for implementing the
Comprehensive Plan. It outlines the basic elements of an ongoing planning process and
program, and includes a listing of projects and actions which should be undertaken during
the next few years to strengthen and improve the local living and working environment.
ZONING ORDINANCE
Zoning is one of the most common regulatory measures used by governmental units to
implement planning policies. It consists of a zoning district map and supporting ordinance
text. The map divides a community into a series of zoning districts, and the text describes
regulations for the use of land within these districts including permitted uses, lot sizes,
setback, density standards, etc. Mount Prospect has a zoning ordinance text and zoning
district map. One of the most important next steps is to update and refine these zoning
regulations to implement and enforce the contents and guidelines of the Comprehensive
Plan.
The Village Board has authorized the Planning Department to revise the Zoning Ordinance
during Fiscal Year 1991-1992.
-47-
A potential tool for implementing the plan is the capital improvement program which
establishes schedules and priorities for all public improvements projects within a five-year
period.
This process requires participation of all Village departments and includes identification
of public improvements that will be required in the next five years, including transportation
and community facility projects. All projects are reviewed on the basis of the
Comprehensive Plan, priorities are assigned, cost estimates prepared, and potential funding
sources identified.
Mount Prospect's financial resources will always be limited, and public dollars must be
spent wisely.- The capital improvements program would allow the Village to provide the
most critical public improvements, yet stay within budget constraints. It could help avoid
costly mistakes and promote maximum community benefits from all public investment.
CITIZEN INVOLVEMENT
The planning and community development processes have established a healthy dialogue
among local residents concerning the future of Mount Prospect. Wide publicity should be
given to the plan, and citizens should be further involved in planning discussions. This
active citizen involvement should become standard policy. The planning process Will affect
everyone in the community, and everyone should contribute to planning decisions.
REVIEW AND REVISION
The Comprehensive Plan is not a static document. The planning process in Mount Prospect
must be continuous. The plan should be monitored and updated when necessary. If
community attitudes change or new issues arise which are beyond the scope of the current
plan, the plan document should be reviewed and updated. From time to time, certain
changes to the plan document will be required. The Plan Commission and Village Board
should carefully review proposed changes and their implications and actively seek citizen
comment on such proposals. If changes are found appropriate, they should be formally
added to the plan by legal amendment. Also, at five-year or ten-year intervals, the entire
plan document should be reviewed and if necessary modified to ensure that it continues to
be an up-to-date expression of community goals and intentions.
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM
The following listing is a general indication of how various projects and actions should be
undertaken during the next few years. Projects and actions are divided into two broad
categories: (1) local administrative actions and decisions, including actions which are
dependent on the availability of regular revenue sources; and (2) actions which would
require special funding assistance or commitment to use of new techniques for
implementation.
-48.
Administrative
These are all high-priority, early -action projects which essentially entail a public policy or
administrative decision. They do not require a significant new allocation of funds, and they
all should be undertaken as soon as possible. These actions relate primarily to escalating
Village efforts in recruiting and promoting desired improvement and development, to
encourage more active participation by individual property owners and businessmen in
overall improvement efforts, and to revise and update local codes, ordinances and
regulations so that they are more supportive of community development objectives.
-Housing-
Closely monitor building' conditions in all neighborhoods within the Village.
Utilize the zoning ordinance to prevent expansion of residential uses in areas most suited
to industrial and/or commercial development.
Revise existing zoning regulations to ensure the protection of sound existing development,
to reduce adverse influences, and to establish setback and buffering requirements for new
nonresidential .development.
Utilize the Land -Use Plan and Zoning Ordinance to establish firm boundaries between
residential and non-residential areas.
Utilize the Land -Use Plan to guide the location, type and amount of multi -family housing.
Review and revise the zoning ordinance to support the desired policy regarding
multi -family housing. This should include special planning and design incentives to
ensure that new development includes a wide range of amenities, and encourages a
range of housing types.
Continue the systematic housing code enforcement program.
Continue to act as a clearinghouse for collecting and disseminating information about
funding sources and assistance available to homeowners for home improvement.
Initiate a program to actively encourage property owners to undertake home repairs and
preventive maintenance.
-Commercial Development.
Revise the zoning map to reflect new commercial area designations, and to establish
firm boundaries between commercial and residential areas.
Utilize zoning regulations to gradually phase out obsolete non-commercial uses within
commercial areas.
-49-
Utilize zoning regulations to encourage new commercial development on a planned
basis, including standards and incentives for shared parking, common access drives,
landscaping, setbacks, etc., to help ensure the highest possible quality of design and
development. Under special situations, mixed use developments should be considered
where appropriate.
Continue to enforce special sign control regulations in commercial areas.
Continue those programs that actively recruit desired types of new commercial
development.
Continue to implement a financial assistance program for the rehabilitation of
commercial buildings. The Downtown Facade Improvement Program should continue
to be part of this assistance.
Develop a clearinghouse for collecting and disseminating information about funding
sources and assistance available to businesses.
-Industrial Development -
Review and revise the zoning map to reflect new industrial area designations and to
establish firm boundaries between industrial and non -industrial areas.
Utilize zoning regulations to gradually phase out obsolete non -industrial uses within
industrial areas.
Review and revise zoning regulations to establish standards and incentives designed to
encourage planned industrial and office research 'development wherever possible.
Provisions should encourage coordinated lot configuration, building design, access and
parking, and overall environmental features, as well as compatible relationships between
existing and new development.
Continue programs to actively promote and recruit desired types of industry.
Continue a program to actively encourage local industries to undertake repairs and
corrective maintenance.
Undertake more strict building code enforcement in industrial areas.
-Community Facilities -
Maintain close contact and continue to cooperate and help all local school districts to
ensure that the needs of Mount Prospect students continue to be met.
Monitor development intensity within high-value commercial and industrial areas to
ensure that adequate fire protection continues to be provided in the future.
-50-
-Parks and Recreation.
Maintain close contact and continue to cooperate and help all local park districts to
ensure that the recreational needs of Mount Prospect residents continue to be met.
Actively support efforts by the local Park Districts to secure funds for the purchase or
lease of open space and recently closed school facilities for recreational use.
Develop standards and requirements which will ensure that small new park sites are
provided by the park district as part of any significant new multi -family development
within the Village.
-Transportation-
.Continue to monitor changes to the designated street system and report them to the
Illinois Department of Transportation. All arterial roadways and collector streets not
designated as a Federal -Aid Primary or Federal -Aid Secondary Roadway should be
designated as part of the Federal Aid Urban System.
Implement a plan to update traffic control devices in accordance with the Thoroughfare
Plan. This step includes the removal of installation of stop signs and the possible re -
timing of traffic signals.
Spegial Program -Actions
Numerous Other actions ideptified in the planning and community development study will
require additional study and analysis to determine the most appropriate and feasible method
of implementation. Many of these projects involve relatively high costs, and others are
characterized by a variety of complex inter -relationships that will require careful
coordination and management. Certain projects would require that the Village initiate a
new program or technique not now being utilized locally, or may require outside funding
assistance from State or Federal sources. Each of these projects must be assessed on an
individual basis, and their ultimate timing should be based on the availability of funding and
the overall acceptability of certain implementation techniques to the Village.
-Housing-
Special housing programs for the Village to review are to:
Promote new housing for the elderly which is convenient to shopping, Village facilities
and services and transportation.
Continue to implement a locally funded and administered low-interest rehabilitation loan
program for low- and moderate -income families. A locally funded and administered low
interest rehabilitation loan program for single family detached homes and a 50% rebate
program for multi -family residential buildings should continue to be a part of the
-51-
Village's housing program for low- and moderate -income families.
Implement a first-time homebuyers program, utilizing federal HOME funds, to assist
moderate income households in acquiring a home.
Encourage and promote the use of rental assistance programs throughout the Village,
especially for low income residents.
Provide financial assistance and the purchase or rehabilitation of housing for the mentally
ill.
-Commercial Development - Downtown -
The Downtown Plan for Mount Prospect prepared in 1976 identified a wide range of public
and private improvement and development projects required to revitalize this important
area of the Village. The plan identified sites to be assembled for new development and
off-street parking, changes to the vehicular access and circulation system, and improvements
required to provide a more attractive and pleasant environment for shoppers and others
visiting or conducting business in the area. These improvements should continue to receive
high priority consideration for implementation.
While many of the recommended projects could be accomplished with local revenues on
a one -at -a -time basis, further consideration should be given to the feasibility of utilizing
special techniques and assistance sources for all or a major portion of the downtown area
as a single, coordinated, revitalization program. Special Service Districts and Tax Increment
Financing together with local revenues should be carefully considered for use in
implementing the following types of projects and actions on a unified plan and program
basis. Special commercial developments in the downtown for the Village to review are:
Acquisition of under-utilized buildings and sites for new commercial development.
Acquisition of sites for development of off-street parking facilities.
Construction of needed street improvements to facilitate access to and circulation in the
greater downtown area.
Construction of new sidewalks and provision of landscaping and other beautification
features and amenities.
-Commercial Development -Rand Road and Northwest Highway Corridors -
The following preliminary listing of projects and actions has been identified as being needed
within the commercial corridors. While many of these could be accomplished with local
revenues, consideration should also be given to the possibility of utilizing special techniques
and assistance sources as part of an overall commercial area improvement plan and
program. The local potential of special service districts and tax increment financing should
all be carefully considered. Special commercial development programs for the Village to
-52-
review are to:
Develop a rehabilitation program for older commercial buildings.
Encourage the redevelopment of residential and other under-utilized properties along
commercial corridors, and make these sites available for new development.
Construct new sidewalks and other pedestrian conveniences to improve pedestrian
shopping in certain locations.
Plant trees and undertake other beautification projects to improve the appearance of
commercial corridors.
Undertakepublic projects, such as new off-street parking lots and pedestrian
improvements, which could stimulate new private investment and development in
commercial areas.
Consolidate access points to parking areas along commercial corridors.
-Community Facilities -
Several existing Village facilities and services may require expansion or relocation in the
future as planned and new development occurs. The need for additional fire stations
should be closely monitored and evaluated on a regular basis. When determined to be
needed and funding is available, the following actions should be considered:
The existing Public Works facility in the downtown should be demolished so it can be
made available for development in accordance with the Downtown Plan.
-Parks and Recreation -
The following projects and actions will involve cooperative efforts between the Village and
Park Districts to secure funding required for lease or purchase and development of
additional park and recreational facilities to serve Mount Prospect residents. Special park
and recreation programs for the Village to review are to:
Maintain permission to use the Commonwealth Edison Company Easement, in the
southwestern portion of the Village.
Maintain cooperative agreements for using the MWRD property on the western edge
of the Village for recreational purposes, and develop the land area for playgrounds, field
games and other informal active recreational activities.
The site at the northwest corner of Elmhurst and Euclid, which is currently owned by
the Village, should be developed as a small park to serve residents in the immediate
area.
-53-
Encourage agreements for continued recreational use of a portion of the elementary
school facility sites at Gregory School and Fairview School.
-Transportation-
r include projects that will improve existing streets to
relieve congestion, provide for more efficient traffic movement in and through Mount
Prospect, and reduce the number of accidents. Improvements included are to:
Provide separate left -turn lanes on all approaches at arterial -with -arterial intersections.
Interconnect traffic signals along Northwest Highway, Rand Road, Illinois Route 83 and
Central Road to provide a coordinated signal system in the Village.
Provide a continuous five -lane section (two through lanes in each direction plus a
left -tum lane) along Central Road from Emerson Street to WaPella Avenue.
Remove the traffic signal from the intersection of Central Road and Prospect Avenue;
Prospect Avenue should be controlled by a stop sign.
If warranted by traffic conditions, install a traffic signal at the intersection of Central
Road and WaPella Avenue.
Widen all secondary arterials to provide for at least four lanes of traffic.
Widen Lonnquist Boulevard to collector street standards in existing section that is not
complete.
Widen Busse Road from Central to Golf, and Mount Prospect Road from Central to
Northwest Highway to four lanes.
Long-rangem include improvements that require major funding
support from the Illinois Department of Transportation or another regional, state, or federal
agency or require cooperation of other political jurisdictions. These improvements are to:
Extend Meier Road as a collector street from Lincoln Street to Central Road. This
project will require new right-of-way and road construction north of Connie Lane. This
northern section of the roadway is along the Village limit adjacent to Arlington Heights.
A study should be conducted to determine if commuter trains on the Chicago, and
Northwestern Railroad create unsatisfactory street congestion at Emerson and Route 83
and if so, whether moving the stopping points of the commuter trains would adequately
reduce the level of train blocking of these streets. The study should also include an
evaluation of the potential for other grade crossings along Northwest Highway.
Encourage creating a passenger service on the Wisconsin Central line as identified in the
2010 Plan.
-54-
Several unincorporated areas currently exist in locations adjacent to the Village and should
be evaluated as to suitability and feasibility of annexation to the Village. A brief description
of each of these areas follows:
1. The area bounded by Dempster Street on the north, Elmhurst Road on the east,
Oakton Street on the south, and the Commonwealth Edison Company easement (west
of Busse Road) on the west. Portions of this area are already within the current Village
boundary. The unincorporated portion of this area is bordered on all sides by the Village
of Mount Prospect, and is partially built up with predominantly industrial and office uses.
This area is already within the Village's natural growth pattern and early consideration
should be given to initiating annexation procedures.
2. The residential subdivision located south of Kensington Road (Foundry) and east of
the Wisconsin Central Railroad. This area could be considered a reasonable extension
of either Mount Prospect or Des Plaines. This area does not appear to be suitable for
annexing to the Village at the present time. Further consideration in the future must
include a detailed evaluation of the need for and estimated cost of street and utility
improvements required to meet minimum standards of the Village.
3. The area south of Oakton Street, west of Elmhurst Road and north of the Northwest
Tollway consists of primarily small industrial uses. This area should be reviewed for
possible annexation. It is recommended that it be continued to be used for light industry.
4. The parcel of property south of Kensington Road between Wolf Road and the
Wisconsin Central Railroad Right -Of -Way is currently vacant and should be considered
for possible annexation. The property has an approximate depth of 200 feet and care
should be taken to ensure that proper development takes place in spite of the physical
constraints of the property.
APPENDIX I
DEVELOPMENT AND REDEVELOPMENT SITES AND AREAS
This section presents land -use recommendations for specific parcels within the Village
which may be subject to change or intensification in the future. For the purpose of
presenting plan recommendations, the Village has been divided into six basic geographical
areas, and land -use changes and modifications for specific parcels within each of these
areas are summarized below. Areas and parcels are illustrated in Figure 6.
AREA 1
Area 1 includes the northeastern portion of the Village, generally north and east of the
Rand Road corridor. It is primarily an established, built-up area anchored by several strong
-55-
2J
6A
6B
6F
�5
6M
61
6K
41 4E 4F 4G
SA
1A
71C
6E / A PPENDIX I
ec Deve!::—en- And Redevelopment
OD Sites And Areas
SH
6G Number -dicces Development Areas
61
OL Letter -dicctes Specific Sites As
Founc n Text For Development
- 56 -- -
and well maintained residential neighborhoods.. Area 1 also contains several existing
multi -family areas, including Boxwood, the area around Old Orchard Country Club, and
smaller clusters near the intersections of Kensington and Des Plaines River Road, and
Westlake Road and Cardinal Lane. Several important non-residential uses are also located
in Area 1, including Randhurst Shopping Center, the Kensington Center for Business and
various park and school sites. The plan attempts to strengthen and reinforce this established
land -use pattern.
Except for Kensington Center, which is currently 90% developed, very little vacant land
remains. Land -use recommendations for specific parcels subject to change are summarized
below.
Parcel A is an isolated vacant parcel still remaining in the residential neighborhood on
the south side of Seminole Lane, between Park Avenue and River Road. It is
recommended that these parcels be developed for single-family residential use in a style and
character compatible with existing homes in the area in Mount Prospect.
Parcel D includes a small vacant parcel at the intersection of Euclid and Elmhurst Road.
It is recommended that this parcel be used for a small community -park or residential use
in a style and character compatible with similar development already present in the area.
is approximately 12,500 square feet located at the intersection of Camp
McDonald Road and Des Plaines River Road. It is recommended that this site be
redeveloped for commercial use, preferably for convenience commercial which could help
serve the day-to-day needs of surrounding residents. Small-scale cluster development should
be encouraged, with consolidated vehicular access from Camp McDonald or River Road.
Care should be taken to ensure that commercial development is adequately screened and
buffered from surrounding residential uses to the south and west.
Parcell is a single vacant site located near the northwest corner of River Road and
Euclid Avenue and on Euclid Avenue. This property should be developed with one or two
small stores due to the small lot size, parking and access should be closely watched.
Parcel E involves three vacant parcels located on the west side of Elmhurst Road
between Oxford Place and Meadow Lane. It is recommended that they be used for
scattered single family residential or low density residential use, with special landscaping to
the rear of the properties to provide a buffer for the single family homes to the west of the
site. Access onto State Route 83 should be limited.
AREA 2
Area 2 includes the Rand Road corridor between Central and Euclid. This corridor
includes a wide range of commercial, office, and business service activities, as well as several
public land -uses. Residential neighborhoods abut Rand Road in certain locations and
several individual homes front the arterial in the northern portion of the corridor. In
addition, established residential neighborhoods adjoin commercial uses on both sides of
-57-
the corridor throughout its length. Several vacant and under-utilized parcels are scattered
along the Rand Road corridor. In general, land -use recommendations tend to reinforce
and strengthen the commercial and office function of the corridor, while maintaining sound
clusters of residential development and ensure a compatible relationship between
commercial activities and adjacent residential areas. Land -use recommendations for specific
parcels subject to change are summarized below.
Parcels A. and B include existing single-family homes directly fronting Rand Road in the
northwestern corner of the corridor. While several reuse possibilities for these areas have
been considered, it is recommended that they be maintained in a single-family use for the
near future. In general, existing homes are in good condition and are adequately screened
and buffered from arterial traffic. In addition, the rear of these properties also abut other
single-family lots and are not separated by alleys. Isolated conversion or redevelopment of
one or two of these lots for office or commercial use would have major impact on other
homes along this strip and should not be permitted. Numerous other parcels along Rand
Road and in other parts of the Village are both more appropriate and more readily
available for office and commercial use.
Parcel includes the small 1.5 -acre West Wedgewood Park operated by the Prospect
Heights Park District, which fronts Rand Road north of Wedgewood Lane. In conjunction
with nearby residential properties, reuse possibilities for this site were also considered.
However, it is recommended that this parcel fronting Rand Road remain.
Parcel D is an existing single vacant lot on the northwest corner of Wedgewood and
Rand Road. While reuse possibilities were considered, it is recommended that the lot be
utilized for single-family use in the near future.
Pucels E. F. and G are located adjacent to each other between Kensington and Rand
Road. Parcel E includes a batting range, miniature golf course and adjacent parking lots
which front Rand Road, while Parcels F and G are vacant sites on Kensington Road. In
general, existing uses represent an under -utilization of prime frontage, and it is
recommended that the area be redeveloped for office/commercial use. Together, these
parcels total approximately 6.4 acres. Cluster development should be encouraged with
consolidated vehicular access off Rand and Kensington, and shared parking areas.
Development similar in character to the existing Talman Federal Savings facility would be
preferred. Special site design standards should be employed, especially along Kensington,
to ensure that new development is compatible with the existing neighborhood to the south.
Parcel H. and I are scattered vacant commercial properties along Rand Road. It is
recommended that each of these parcels be reused for general commercial activities. In
some cases, existing buildings may be conducive to conversion, although redevelopment
similar to surrounding uses should be encouraged. The possibility of consolidating vehicular
access and parking facilities with adjacent existing uses should be explored.
Parcel J is a mixed-use commercial area on the east side of Rand Road south of
Kensington which includes the Holiday Inn, Goodyear Tire, and several other commercial
uses. While existing activities appear viable and no change in use is suggested, a range of
-58-
overall environmental improvements should be undertaken like consolidation of vehicular
access off Rand Road redesign and possible consolidation of parking areas, commercial
signage improvement, etc. Lot consolidation should be encouraged for better utilization of
the properties between the Holiday Inn and the single family homes to the east.
Parsels & L and include mixed residential, commercial, and vacant parcels on the
east side of Rand Road between Highland and Business Center Drive. It is recommended
that as much of this area as possible be assembled to allow for planned and coordinated
development. Parcel K, which consists of four lots, should be developed in a consolidated
manner, with no more than two driveways accessing Rand Road. Special screening and
buffering should be provided between future commercial activities in Parcels K and L and
neighborhoods to the east. Lot M should be developed for townhomes and roadways
connected to the townhome development to the north.
Parcel N is a 2.43 -acre vacant parcel located on the west side of Rand Road, north of
Thayer Street. It is recommended that this area be developed for general commercial use,
with development focused toward Rand Road, away from neighborhoods to the west, with
the general guidelines for clustering, access, parking, and screening and buffering to be
applied.
Parcel O includes several vacant parcels still remaining in the residential neighborhood
east of the commercial corridor and north of Central Avenue. It is recommended that
these parcels be developed for single-family residential use in a style and character
compatible with existing homes in the area.
AREA 3
Area 3 includes the central portion of the Village, generally located between the Rand
Road and Northwest Highway corridors. It is an established, built-up area consisting of
several strong and well maintained residential neighborhoods. This area also includes
several public school sites, including Prospect High School and various other public and
semi-public areas. No vacant land remains within these neighborhoods, and no land -use
changes are recommended in Area 3.
U;i9—y'
Area 4 includes the Northwest Highway corridor between Mount Prospect Road and the
western Village limits. This corridor includes a range of convenience commercial, office
and business service activities, the downtown area, and several small light industrial uses
located south of the METRA Railroad. Whereas the depth of commercial properties along
Rand Road is great enough to accommodate large-scale commercial operations, the depth
of properties along the Northwest Highway corridor is quite limited, except in the downtown
area. Residential neighborhoods directly abut commercial uses on both sides of the corridor
for most of its length, and several single-family homes front Northwest Highway in the
northern portion of the corridor.
Little vacant land remains within Area 4. However, several areas, particularly in the
-59-
downtown, may be subject to reuse and redevelopment in the future. Land -use
recommendations attempt to reinforce the existing functional groupings along the corridor,
strengthen the multiple -use role of downtown as a community -wide focal point, and ensure
a compatible relationship between commercial activities and adjacent neighborhoods.
Areas in the downtown should be developed in the following priority order: 1) Triangle
Redevelopment Area, between Main, Central and Northwest Highway; 2) Emerson Street
- Busse to Central; and 3) Scattered lots - Busse Avenue.
Land -use recommendations for specific parcels subject to change are summarized below.
Parcel A includes a 5.6 -acre vacant parcel on the south side of the METRA Railroad,
east of Lancaster Street. This site is bordered on the east and south by existing industrial
operations and on the west by residential/office uses It is recommended that this site be
used for light industrial activity. Vehicular access si d be provided from Central Avenue,
and a new access street would have to be construc: iong the edge of one of the existing
industrial properties. Access to the site should not b� arough the residential neighborhood
to the west. Special screening and buffering should be provided on the western edge of the
site between industrial and residential uses.
Parcel B is a narrow strip of mixed office and commercial uses along the north side of
Northwest Highway and Central Road, between Forest and Elmhurst Avenues . It is
recommended that this area be maintained as a commercial service strip with no major land
use changes. However, a number of operational improvements should be undertaken,
including the consolidation of vehicular access drives off Northwest Highway, the redesign
and possible expansion of off-street parking areas, and overall appearance and
"housekeeping" improvements. Alleys and the rear portions of buildings should be better
maintained, and curbs and sidewalks should also be improved in several areas.
Parch includes Mount Prospect's downtown area. The Land -Use Plan recommends
that the downtown be strengthened and improved as a focal point for the community. The
downtown should be reinforced as a multi -use area with expanded office and convenience
shopping districts, key public and semi-public facilities, and new close -in townhouses and
multi -family development. Specific land -use recommendations for the downtown are
included in Chapter 3 of the Plan Report.
Parcel D is a narrow strip of mixed office and commercial uses along the north side of
Northwest Highway between Mount Prospect Road and downtown. It is recommended that
this area be maintained as a mixed commercial district, providing sites for various office,
personal service, business service, and auto -related commercial activities. Because of the
condition of buildings and the narrow depth of commercial frontages, no major land -use
changes are recommended. However, a number of operational improvements should be
undertaken, including the consolidation of vehicular access drives off Northwest
Highway, the redesign and possible expansions of off-street parking areas, and overall
appearance and "housekeeping" improvements. Alley and the rear portions of buildings
should be better maintained, and curbs and sidewalks should also be improved in several
areas.
-60-
Parcel E is an existing industrial block bounded by Prospect Avenue, Maple Street, and
Lincoln Street. No land -use changes are recommended. The one remaining vacant lot
in the southern part of this block should be used for either industrial expansion or parking.
Screening and buffering should be improved along the residential edges of this parcel.
Parcel 1F and G are blocks which currently contain primarily multi -family housing,
although an industrial use is located in the corner of each block. It is recommended that
these blocks be maintained in their present use. However, these areas should be monitored
to ensure that the existing industrial uses do not adversely impact adjoining residential
areas. If the existing industrial uses are phased out in the future, these sites should be
reused for residential development.
Parcel H is a commercial shopping center area north of Central Road on the west side
of Main Street. It is recommended that the site be planned for commercial- residential
mixed-use, in order to capitalize on its positive location for residential commuters and add
to the shopping center market.
Parcel I and J. These small parcels are zoned for business and are vacant. Because of
their size, they should be developed carefully and perhaps in conjunction with the
redevelopment of adjacent property for commercial/residential mixed use. These sites are
located east and south of Mrs. P and Me Restaurant .
AREA 5
Area 5 includes the south-central portion of the Village, generally located between the
Northwest Highway corridor and Dempster Street. This area primarily consists of
single-family residential neighborhoods and numerous public uses including public and
private schools and parks and recreational areas. Several multi -family residential areas are
also located within this area, including a large concentration north of Dempster Street and
smaller clusters along Golf Road and Central Road. Very few vacant land parcels or
under-utilized properties are located in this area.
Parcel A is a 3.77 acre vacant site located east and south of the intersection of Church
and Linneman Roads. It is bounded on the east, south and west by multi -family residential
developments and on the north by St. John Lutheran Church and School. This area is
planned for the expansion of the Church/School Complex.
Parcel B is a small strip of vacant land located adjacent to existing multi -family housing
development in the south-western corner of the Village. It is recommended that the 2.2
acre Algonquin Road site be developed for multi -family residential use with a density of 8
units per acre.
AREA 6
Area 6 includes the far southwestern portion of the Village generally bounded by Dempster,
Elmhurst, Oakton, and Busse Road. The area presently contains a range of land -uses,
including light industrial activities along Dempster, Algonquin, and Busse Road; heavy
-61-
industry south of Algonquin; and mixed commercial and business uses along the Elmhurst
Road frontage. Multi -family housing is located near the intersection of Algonquin and
Busse, Dempster and Elmhurst, and Elmhurst and Oakton. A mobile home park is located
in the southwestern corner of this area, and a small cluster of single-family homes exist
along Dempster west of Elmhurst Road.
Area 6 offers some of the Village's most significant opportunities for new development.
This area has excellent accessibility from major arterial streets and the tollway and is highly
visible from these key routes. Several relatively large vacant land parcels are scattered
throughout the area and certain other parcels could undergo development intensification.
The Land -use Plan attempts to capitalize on this area's potential for major new
office/commercial and industrial development, offering a range of development sites for
both large and small-scale operations. In general, office/commercial activities are promoted
along the Dempster and Elmhurst Road frontages as well as along the north side of
Algonquin. Industrial development is recommended primarily south of Algonquin. In
addition, new multi -family residential development is suggested adjacent to commercial
activities west of Elmhurst and north of Algonquin. A large amount of this areas has
recently been annexed into the Village. The Village should take action to bring the entire
Area 6 up to Village Codes. Land -use recommendations for specific parcels subject to
change are summarized below.
Parcels A. B. and C are vacant land areas located along the south side of Dempster.
Several alternatives were evaluated for these sites, including office/commercial, multi -family
housing, general business, and light industry. Based on accessibility, locational
considerations and surrounding uses, it is recommended that each of these parcels be
developed for office/light industrial use in the future. The United Airlines facility provides
a strong focal point for this area, and similar or related development should be encouraged.
Parcels are large enough to allow for large, single -tenant facilities or several smaller
buildings in cluster arrangement. Vehicular access should be provided off Dempster, and
parking areas and building sites should be attractively landscaped to help create a strong
visual image for the corridor.
Because of its location at the intersection of Dempster and Busse, Parcel A. could be
further developed for general commercial development. High quality guidelines and
standards should be employed to ensure an attractive and complementary use to those
currently on the site and surrounding area.
Parcel D is a vacant land area on the north side of Algonquin, east of Linneman Road.
It is recommended that these parcels be developed for light industrial/office use. The sites
could accommodate one or two larger facilities or a cluster of smaller uses similar to those
along Malmo Road to the east.
Parcel E includes five single-family homes located on relatively deep lots fronting
Dempster west of Elmhurst Road. Single-family homes are not compatible with the intense
office and industrial character beginning to emerge in this area and should eventually be
phased out. Based on an evaluation of several reuse possibilities for this parcel, it is
recommended that this area be redeveloped for multi -family housing in the future. New
housing should be focused inward, away from Dempster.
-62-
Parcels F. G.'H and I are small, scattered, vacant, and under-utilized land areas south
of Algonquin Road. Several low intensity commercial and industrial properties may be
subject to redevelopment. It is recommended that all of these parcels be developed for
general industrial use. Since these areas have irregular shapes and some have limited
access, site development plans should be prepared for each area to determine possible
industrial lot configuration, access streets, and internal circulation systems. If possible,
vacant areas should be combined with adjacent developed areas to create overall industrial
subdivisions offering maxi—um development flexibility. Special site design standards should
be considered to help giv,. the area a more consistent image and appearance, particularly
around the periphery.
Parcels J is vacant land just west of the Park National Bank building off of Elmhurst
Road south of Algonquin. It is recommended that this area be developed for commercial
or office use. The scale and intensity of development should be similar to uses already
located along the corridor, and new uses which are related to and supportive of existing
activities should be encouraged. Screening and buffering should be provided between
commercial parcels and existing multi -family housing to the south.
Parcel K includes the existing mobile home park on the north side of Oakton. It is
recommended that this area eventually be redeveloped for general industrial activities in
keeping with the overall scale and character of this area. The same general principles
described above for Parcels F, G, H and I should also be employed in this area.
Parcel L includes the area of Oakton Road, north of the Northwest Tollway and west
of the Des Plaines corporate limits. This site is comprised primarily of small industrial
firms. It is recommended that this area should be considered for future annexation at the
appropriate time and continued to be used for Light Industry.
Parcel M is a vacant triangular parcel at the northwest corner of Busse Road and the
Northwest Tollway. It is recommended that this parcel be utilized for industrial use.
Driveway access should be via a single roadway and carefully located for maximum visibility
and minimum conflict with other roadways onto Busse Road.
,63-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECr, ILLINOIS 60056
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Project Engineer
DATE: June 11, 1992
SUBJECT: Village Street Reconstructions
Attached is a Resolution for Improvement by Municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code
(BIR 4103) for $150,000.00 for the Village Street Reconstructions Project. The project
includes the improvements of:
Bittersweet Lane - Quince Ln. to Burning Bush Lane
The resolution is required by the Illinois Department of Transportation before motor fuel
tax funds can be used for this project.
I recommend that this resolution be adopted at the Village Board Meeting on June 16,
1992. This project will be funded with monies from the 1992-1993 Budget, Account
Numbers 22-071-04-8510, Page 139.
Fred Tennyson, .E.
I concur with the above recommendation
ol,fr A. u.1b'ecker, P.E.
igi i Coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
e4lwle,e"-�
Chuck Bencic, P.E.
Director of Inspection Services
F17/m
Illinois Department Resolution for Improvement by Municipality construction
of Transportation Under the Illinois Highway Code
BE IT RESOLVED, by the MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the
C.—W or ProAdoot W board of Tr
VILLAGE of MOUNT PROSPECT Illinois
Cky, T— or VdUp
that the following descrived street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Code:
Name of Thoroughfare Route From To
BITTERSWEET LANE QUINCE LANE BURNING BUSH LANE
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAM BASE AND
DETERIORATED SURFACE, WITH INSTALLATION OF NEW CURB & GUTTER AND FLEXIBLE BASE.
and be designated as Section
and shall be constructed
92 -00113 -00 -FP
feet wide
2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional) sum of ONE HUNDRED FIFTY THOUSAND DOLLARS
Dollars ($ 150,000.00 for the
improvement of said section from the municipality's allotment of Motor Fuel Tax funds.
3. That work shall be done by
CONTRACT
; and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit two certified copies of this
resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation.
%J-911191110 01
, 19
Doq.m of T—prrvar—
Driaria Foxi r
Mr.
1, Miss CAROL A. FIELDS VILLAGE Clerk
Mrs. (City, Toro. or VWW)
in and for th VILLAGE of MOUNT PROSPECT
County of COOK hereby certify the foregoing
to be true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
(C—fl or Nr6dooi and Board of Trrwar.)
JUNE 16 19 92
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
day of A.D. 19
(SEAL)
VILLAGE Clerk.
(City, Town or Wks.)
�
U1111nois Department of Transportation
Division of Highways/ District 1
201 West Center Court/Schaumburg, Illinois/60196-1096
June ], 1992
Mr. Herbert Weeks, Director
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mt, Prospect, IL 60056
Dear ac. Weeks:
On or about July I, 1991, the State of Illinois, acting
through its Department of Transportation, entered into an
Agreement for the maioteoaooe of mnoicigoI Streets with
your municipality.
This is to inform you that the Department finds the terms
of this Agreement to be satisfactory and is hereby
extending it to cover the 12 -month period beginning July
I, 1992, and ending June 30, 1993. The adjustment factor
used to determine the rates of compensation obovo on the
Computation Sheet will remain at 2.92 as the result of a
Department decision to not decrease the adjustment factor
despite a 2,4% decrease in the FeWa Index used to
calculate this factor. As a result, the Department will
pay your municipality $49,654.00 as compensation for the
satisfactory maintenance and operation of the streets
covered by this extension of the Agceement'
If you have any questions or if we can be of any
assistance, please contact Mr. Robert J. Holub at
708-705-4I63.
Very truly yours,
`-' u"J
/l � i
�\ �� z,"~~~"
Ralph C. Weboac
o1ceotoc of Highways
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
7= CM UsIt
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: June 8, 1992
SUBJECT: IDOT Maintenance Agreement
Attached is a letter from the Illinois Department of Transporta-
tion wherein they are asking the Village to extend our mainte-
nance agreement on specified state highways for one more year
ending June 30, 1993. The rates of compensation will remain at
this current year's level of adjustment. We will be paid
$49,654 for this maintenance, which includes sweeping, pothole
patching crack filling and plowing and salting. It does not
cover major reconstruction, curb replacement or storm sew-
ers/inlets.
Streets included under this agreement are Route 83 between Golf
and Kensington, Central between Rand and Busse, and Northwest
Highway in its entirety.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
MAINTAGR.193/FILES/IDOT
CAF/
6/11/92
19 *03 fill$ 0 CQ Z M Z
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXTENSION OF
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR ROADWAY K --,S
.-AINTENANCE A- SET FORTHO
IN R' -91
ESLUTION NO. 23
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
have accepted maintenance responsibilities for specified State
roadways within the corporate boundaries of the Village; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the Illinois Department
of Transportation, an Agreement was authorized between the Village
of Mount Prospect and the Illinois Department of Transportation
through the adoption of Resolution No. 23-91 covering said
maintenance of State roadways covering the period of July 1, 1991
through June 30, 1992, which Agreement specified the
responsibilities assumed by the Village of Mount Prospect.
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the best interests of the
parties to said Agreement being the subject of Resolution No. 23-
91 would be served by extending said Agreement for one additional
year; and
WHEREAS, the Illinois Department of Transportation will reimburse
the Village for said State roadway maintenance for the period from
July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993 in the amount of $49,654.00.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize the extension of an Agreement
between the Illinois Department of Transportation and the Village
of Mount Prospect for roadway maintenance, as provided in
Resolution No. 23-91, a copy of the statement to extend said
Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
a
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
FROM; FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO
DATE: JUNE 9, 1992
SUBJECT. UNIFORM BIDS
The Village of Mount Prospect provides a $300- uniform allowance to
each sworn member of the fire department. The total purchases during
the fiscal year never exceed the budgeted total. All items other than fire
protective clothing are funded by this clothing allowance.
Sealed bids were opened on May 26, 1992, for the proposed purchase of.
UNIFORMS AND CLOTHING
EXERCISE CLOTHING
EXERCISE FOOTWEAR
FIRE PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
Two bids were received, Kale and R+R. The items up for bid were
divided into several categories and I recommend that the low bid be
awarded in each category. See page 4 for (item) break down:
CATEGORY
KALE's BID
R+R's BID
DRESS UNIFORM
$415.25
$373. 5
19 HEMS)
WORK UNIFORM
$255.65
$233.72
(11 ITEM5)
WINTER WEAR
$366.65
$404.23
(5 ITEMS)
I recommend R+R receive the bid for the items associated with the Dress
and Work uniform. I also recommend that Kale receive the bid for items
associated with Winter Wear.
Funds for the purchase of these items are available from the "Clothing
Allowance" Budget, Account Code 1-042-01-7110. We can expect to
spend up to $20,400 from this account.
Exercise Clothing
We received two complete bids and one partial bid; Connections Unlimited,
Mighty Mite and the partial from Artistic.
The following 6 items are specified as "Russel" exercise clothing. Artistic did not
bid on these items, Mighty Mite did not meet our specs, Connections Unlimited
gave us the only acceptable bid:
BID ITEM
CONNECTIONS
BID
SWEATSHIRT: CREW NECK
$14.75
REFERENCE: RUSSEL #69809MO
SWEATSHIRT: HOODED
$18.45
REFERENCE: RUSSEL #69509M0
SWEATSHIRT: HOODED ZIPPER
$17.25
REFERENCE: RUSSEL #69709MO
SWEAT PANTS
$14.75
REFERENCE. RUSSEL #6909MO
TEE SHIRTS: WHITE AND NAVY
$6.80
REFERENCE: #6555M0
GYM SHORTS
$9.30
REFERENCE: 55113MO
I recommend that Connections Unlimited be awarded the bids on the above
items. Our market research indicates that these prices are fair.
Funds for the purchase of these items are available from the "Clothing
Allowance" Budget, Account Code 1-042-01-7110.
Exercise Footwear
We sent bid notices to 3 local gym shoe venders. We received 1 reply from
Footlocker at Randhurst. They are offering a 20% discount.
I recommend that Footlocker be awarded the bid. In addition to offering the
lowest bid, they have the best selection of shoes in the area, the most convenient
location and we have developed a good business relationship with them.
Funds for the purchase of these items are available from the "Clothing
Allowance" Budget, Account Code 1-042-01-7110.
Fire Protective Clothing
We received two bids, Mac's and GFE.
The items up for bid were divided into several categories see page 5 for (item)
break down:
CATEGORY
MAC's BID
GFE's BID
FIREFIGHTING BOOTS
$256.25
$228.15
(3 nT-MS)
FIRE HELMET
BEN FRANKLIN
BEN FRANKLIN
0 UEM)$176.00
NO BID
CLASSIC 1000
CLASSIC1000
$161.00
$138.75
FIRE GLOVES AND
$42.35
$43-35
PBI HOODS
(2 UEMS)
FIREFIGHTING
$715.00
NO BID
COAT & PANTS
Q MEW
I recommend that GFE receive the bids associated with firefighting boots. I also
recommend that Mac's Fire and Safety receive the bids for fire gloves, hoods, fire
coats and pants. Due to recent changes in NFPA regulations regarding fire
helmets, we asked for bids on 2 newly developed helmets that pass the new
regulations. The helmets are new to the market and have not yet been fully
evaluated by us. When we have evaluated these products a decision will be made
as to which helmet will best suit our specs. Future purchases will be made
accordingly. If the Ben Franklin is chosen, I recommend purchases be made from
Mac's and if the Classic 1000 becomes the helmet of choice, I then recommend
purchases be made from GFE. We anticipate expending the following amounts:
Fire Helmets $2,400
Fire Coat and Pants $4,670
Boots $ 720
Gloves/Hoods $ 410
Funds for these purchases are available from the "Turn Out Clothing"
Budget,Account Code 51-042-02-815.
UNIFORM AND CLOTHING
WINNING BIDS ARE PRECEDED BY ASTERISK
BID ITEM
CATEGORY
R+R BID
KALE BID
SHIRTIFIREMAN US BLUE
WORK
*19.79
21.45
POLY/COTTON
SHIRTIFIREMAN SIS BLUE
WORK19.45
*16.53
POLY/COTTON
SHIRT/OFFICER US WHITE
WORK
*25.50
25.00
POLYESTER
SHIRT/OFFICER SIS WHITE
WORK
*23.95
23.45
POLYESTER
SHIRT/OFFICER US MITE
WORK
*21.15
2200
POLYICOTTON
SHIRTIOFFICER S/S WHITE
WORK
*18.72
20.00
POLY/COTTON
WORK TROUSERS
WORK25,95
*23.95
POLY/COTTON
SPRING JACKET. QUILTED LINER
WORK*
32.99
36.95
REFERENCE: HOLLOWAY #2146
SPRING JACKET: LIGHT WEIGHT
WORK9s
*26.39
33.95
REFERENCE: HOLLOWAY #2147
WINTER JACKET
WINTER WEAR
231.39
*205.00
REFERENCE* BLAUER # 9019Z
SHIRT/DRESS LIS WHITE
DRESS22.50
*22.10
POLYESTER
NO COLLAR OR NAME, INSIGNIA
SHIRT/DRESS S/S WHITE
DRESS
*20.25
20.95
POLYESTER
NO COLLAR OR NAME, INSIGNIA
SHIRTIDRESS LIS WHITE
DRESS19.50
*18.25
POLY/COTTON
NO COLLAR OR NAME, INSIGNIA
SHIRT/DRESS S/S WHITE
DRESS17.50
*16.80
POLY/COTTON
NO COLLAR OR NAME, INSIGNIA
DRESS CAP: BLUE
DRESS39.95
*22.35
REFERENCE; SUPERIOR #118
DRESS CAP: WHITE
DRESS
*23.50
39.95
REFERENCE: SUPERIOR #116
DRESS TROUSERS
DRESS
*23.25
24.95
DRESS BLOUSE
DRESS
*89.95
89.95
DRESS TOP COAT
DRESS
*137.50
140.00
REFERENCE: LONDON FOG, DOUBLE BREASTED
SWEATER
WINTER
47.22
*39.95
REFERENCE: JOHNNY COAT, 100% WOOL, FULL, LENGTH
WEAR
ZIPPER
SWEATER
WINTER
44.72
*44.95
REFERENCE: WOOLY PULLY
WEAR
SWEATER
WINTER
38.40
*36.95
COMMANDO- LIGHTWEIGHT
WEAR
SWEATER
WINTER
42.50
*39.95
COMMANDO - LIGHT WEIGHT
WEAR
WITH ZIPPER
WORK CAP -BASEBALL TYPE
WORK
6.95
9.95
WORK BELT
WORK
7.95
8.95
LEATHER CLOVESW
ORK
I
*16.80
18.50
I
FIRE PROTECTIVE CLOTHING
WINNING BIDS ARE PRECEDED BY AN ASTERISK
BID ITEM
MAC'S
GFE'S
BID
BID
HIP BOOTS
$98.00
*$85.60
REFERENCE: SERVUS FIREBREAKER 11468
KNEE BOOTS
$74.75
*$70.45
REFERENCE: RANGER SHOE FIT
KNEE BOOTS
$83.50
*$72.10
REFERENCE: SERVUS 16" 11467
FIRE HELMET
*$176.00
NO BID
REFERENCE: MORNING PRIDE - BEN
FRANKLIN
FIRE HELMET
$161.00
*$138.75
REFERENCE: CAIRNS CLASSIC 1000 R
PBI HOOD
*$17.35
$17.85
WITH ELASTIC, FACE LONG STYLE
LEATHER FIRE GLOVES
*$25.00
$25.50
REFERENCE: FIREMAN VIII
FIREFIGHTING ENSEMBLE
*$715.00
NO BID
REFERENCE: MORNING PRIDE #1440, SEE
SPECS FOR OPTIONS
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= (MLU
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: June 10, 1992
SUBJ: Sealed Bid Results - Water Meters
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 a.m. on June 9, 1992, for the
proposed purchase of water meters in different sizes and quanti-
ties. Four invitational bids were sent out, plus filing a bid
notice in 'the local newspaper as required.
Comparing last year's price on the most popular sizes against
this year's bid shows there has been a reduction in unit costs.
Example:
5/8" x 3/4" Model 25 meter
1-1/2" Model 120 meter
2" Model 170 meter
Current Bid Last Year's Bid
$ 21.00 $ 24.85
172.00 193.06
230.80 266.16
A tabulation of this year's bid results is attached. On Page
162 of the current budget under Account Code 41-072-07-7385
there is $70,000 allocated for the purchase of water meters.
I recommend that the lowest bid as submitted by Badger Meter,
Inc., be accepted and that a two (2) year contract be entered
into with bid prices remaining firm until the expiration date of
June 30, 1994. As most of these meters and.related equipment
are replacement units they are purchased on a "as needed" ba-
sis. I request that for this fiscal year we be authorized to
spend up to $70,000 for these purchases from Badger Meter Inc.
HLW/eh
Attached
WTRMTRRE.SLT/FILESJBIDS
BID RESULTS
Water Meters/Registers - Bid of June 9, 1992
Vendors
Item I Description Quantity Badger Meter, Inc. Midwest Meter, Inc. Utility Equipment, Inc.
5/8* X 3/4" Badger Model 25
100
$21.00
$32.50
$32.14
1-1/2- Badger
40
$162.00
$235.00
$239.68
Model 120 Hex.
None
1-1/2"
- $12.00
$7.00
1-1/2" Badger
40
$ 172.00
$235.00
$239.68
Model 120 Ellip.
2" Badger
70
$230.80
$315.00
$330.40
Model 170 Ellip.
Badger Full Featured Integral
250
$141.50
$175.00
$182.56
Meter Module
5/8" X 1/2" Badger Meter
$21.00
$32.50
$32.14
1" Badger
Model 70 Meter
$65.00
$75.00
$87.36
2" Badger 4 -Bolt
$949.00
$1,050.00
$1,119.36
Flange Meter
Badger Automatic Full-
$121.50
$175.00
$180.88
Featured Remote Module
Badger Basic
$88.70
$110.00
$99.34
Integral Module
Badger Basic
$80.00
$ 150.00
$163.52
Remote Module
Generator Interface Module
$39.95
Other
Parts Price Discount
List Less 33%
Trade - In -Allowance
5/8" X 1/2"
- $3.00
$2.75
None
5/8" X 3/4"
- $3.00
$2.75
None
1"
- $7.50
$3.50
None
1-1/2"
- $12.00
$7.00
None
* Les$ Registers & Connections
-Quantities to be determined throughout life of contract.
-Trade-in is based on purchase of one new meter for each bronze meter traded -in.
Freight will be paid on all trade-in shipments in excess of 50 units or 500 lbs.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
W INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM T= arY usA
77
TO: Village manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: June 9, 1992
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results
Catch Basin/Inlet Cleaning
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 AM on June 9, 1992 for a pro-
posed contract to clean catch basins and inlets. There were
five invitational bids sent out plus advertising as required.
Attached is a comparison of bids received. The quantities list-
ed were estimated for bidding purposes. I recommend acceptance
of the lowest bid as submitted by J,.Doheny, Inc. The base bid
is for $20,662, but I recommend that authorization be given to
increase the quantities on an as -needed basis to the maximum
amount in the budget of $30,000.
Funds for this contractual work were allocated in the current
budget on page 142, account code 01-071-07-6264 for $30,000.
�6,LL-A�--2 ,�
(�� A - � L6
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
BASNCL92.RES/FILES/BIDS
5 bids sent out
Account Code 1-071-07-6264, pg. 142
$30,000
Catch Basin and Inlet Cleaning
6-9-92
BIDDER:
J.Dohen
Inc.
Dombrowski
& Holmes
Stanton
Equipment
Co.
National
Rodding
Power
Corp.
Est
Qty.
Unit
Price
Total
Unit
Price Total
Unit
Price
Total
Unit
Price
Total
Inlets 338
Catch Basins 178
Totals
19.00
80.00
6,422
14,240
20,662
25.00 8,450
29.95
10
123.10
47.00
15,886
85.00 15,130
77.50 13 795.00
111.00
19L758
23 580
23,918.10
35,644
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM MY use
To: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: June 10, 1992
SUBJECT: Catch Basin/Inlet Repair Bid
On June 9, 1992, sealed bids were opened for contractual catch
basin/inlet repair work. Tabulation of bid results is at-
tached. Funds for this proposed work are included on pages 142
and 146 of the current budget, account codes 1-071-07-6260 and
1-071-07-6263.
I recommend that the low bid, as submitted by Artley Paving, be
approved and that authorization be given to increase the
scope/quantities of this contract up to the maximum budget
amount of $35,000. There are unknown variables, such as side-
walk and curb removal and replacement, which could affect the
final price of this work.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
BSNREP92.RES/FILES/BIDS
10 bids sent out
Account Code 1-071-07-6260, pg. 142, $30,000
Account Code 1-071-11-6263, pg. 146, $ 5,000 (state highways)
BSNREP92.RESjFILESJBIDS
6-9-92
CATCH BASIN AND INLET REPAIR
Bid
Opening Sheet
Suburban
Abboreno
BIDDER:
Artley
Paying
General Const.
Construction
Item
Est.
Unit
Unit
Unit
No.
Item
Unit
Qty.
Price
Total
Price Total
Price
Total
1
Structure to be
adjusted
Ea.
5
235
1,175
350 1,175
250
1,250
2
Structure to be
reconstructed
Ea.
3
480
1,440
550 1,650
800
2,400
650 6,500
750
7,500
3 Inlet to be replaced Ea. 10 510 5,100
4
Catch basin to be
5
replaced
Curb removal and
Ea.
5
1,525
7 625
1,885 9 425
1 782
8,910
6
replacement
Pavement removal
L.F.
101
30
3,030
20 2,020
18
1,818
7
and replacement
Sidewalk removal
S.Y.
52
40
2,080
9.50 494
30
1Z560
and replacement
S.F.
--
6
7
TOTAL
2.0,450
21,839
23,438
BSNREP92.RESjFILESJBIDS
6-9-92
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= aTv um
............
TO:
Village
Manager
FROM:
Director
Public Works
DATE:
June 10,
1992
SUBJECT:
Pavement
Marking Bid
Sealed bids were opened on June 9, 1992 for a proposed pavement
marking bid. Bid results as follows:
A C Pavement Striping Co., Inc. $24,239.11
Preform Traffic Control Systems Ltd. 26,627.41
Mark -It Corporation 28,541.35
Marking Specialists Corporation 41,917.22
Our goal has been to restripe those streets that need it in
one-half of the community each year and the central business
district once per year. Attached is the general outline and
quantities which were bid on.
On page 139 of the current budget, under account codes
1-071-04-6145 and 46-073-03-6230, there is $17,000 allocated for
this work. As the bids we received were all over budget, I
recommend that we reduce quantities to stay within the budget.
I recommend awarding the contract to AC Pavement Striping Co.,
Inc. at a cost not to exceed $17,000.
a
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
STRPNG92.RES/FILES/BIDS
LOCATION AND QUANTITIES OF PAVEMENT MARKING BID
Opened June 9, 1992
Est. Ln.
Ft.
Location
NORTH
SIDE OF TOWN
Westgate Rd.
White
61'
8,877
White
16"
6,650
White
12"
3,327
White
4"
765
Yellow
411
45,250
White
6' (Arrow)
13 ea.
White
6' (ONLY )
13 ea.
DOWNTOWN
4"
Westgate Rd.
White 41'
Yellow
1,485
White 6"
1,200
2,310
White 6'
(ONLY)
(3) ea.
White 6'
(Arrow)
(3) ea.
Yellow 4"
2,254
STATE HIGHWAYS
White 24"
Stop Bars
800
White 1211
Cross Walks
480
CENTERLINES - YELLOW
LINES NORTH SIDE OF TOWN
Yellow
4"
Westgate Rd.
2,400
Yellow
4"
Centennial
1,200
Yellow
4"
Opus
30,000
Yellow
4"
Burning Bush
8,200
Yellow 4" Prospect Ave. 6,180
Yellow 4" Seminole to
Andoa - River Rd.
3,350
PARKING LOTS - White lines
Maple St. Lot -287 sp.
5,740
(60 degrees)
White 8' (Double Arrow)
2 ea.
White 6' (Arrow)
2 ea.
Wille St. Lot -50 sp.
1,000
(90 degrees)
White 6' (Arrow)
2 ea.
R/R Station- 24 sp.
480
(90 degrees)
East R/R Lot- 160 sp.
3,200
(90 degrees)
Busse Lot - 12 spaces
240
(90 degrees)
Senior Ctr. Lot- 44 sp.
880
(90 degrees)
White 51 (Arrow)
2 ea.
Vil. Hall Lot- 68 sp.
1,360
(60 degrees)
I Walkway
60
White 61 (Arrows)
6
White 8' (Double Arrows)
2
Handicapped emblem
1
Public Safety Lot 74 sp.
(90 degrees)
1,480
1 Walkway
60
White 41 (Arrows)
a
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: June 10, 1992
SUBJECT: SHARED COST SIDEWALK PROGRAM - 1992
On June 9, 1992, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for
the Shared Cost Sidewalk Program. At this time, the sealed bids
were publicly opened and read aloud.
There were five items listed in the bid package. The Bidder
was requested to submit a unit price per square foot for removal
and replacement of concrete sidewalks, installation of new
sidewalks where none existed, curb & gutter removal and
replacement, sodding special and sidewalk removal and replacement
at Driveway aprons at various locations throughout the Village.
BIDS RECEIVE
Ten contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of
eight contractors submitted bids. The bids ranged from a low of
$49,375.00, by F.M.T. Concrete Contractors to a high of $72,375.00
by Globe Construction. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was
$58,725.00.
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds or Cashier's Check in the
amount of 10% of their total bid as required by the Contract
Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds.
All bids were based on our estimate of 14,000 S.F. of walk to
be replaced, new PCC Sidewalk 4,000 S.F., PCC Curb & Gutter Remove
and Replace, 250 L.F., Special Sodding, 300 S.Y.,and 3,500 S.F. of
P.C.C. Sidewalk Removal and Replacement at Driveway Aprons.
Page Two
QUALIFICATIONS OF LOW BIDDER
The low Bidder is F.M.T. Concrete Contractors, Streamwood, Il.
This bidder submitted three references and the Engineering Division
has verified the qualifications. F.M.T. has not preformed any
Village contracts.
RECOMMENDATION
The Engineering Division recommends awarding this Contract to
F.M.T. Concrete Contractors of Streamwood. Funding for this
Project is included in this year's budget.
Funding for this project will be from two accounts:
Account Code No. 1-071-04-8301 - $18,000.00
Account Code No. 1-071-04-8302 - $45,000.00
al W,
7
ivllb-ec-k—er, P * E
�q oordinator
i ax 19c,
I concur with the above recommendation
Chuck Bencic,
Director of Inspection Services
I concur with the above recommendation
Her Weeks,
Director of Public Works
JAW/CVD:m
Mount Prospect
Public
o
Department
June 17, 1992
Storm Cleanup
Cost Summary and
Supporting
Rental Equipment
$ 9,010.00
Inter- Governmental Assistance
10,863.00
Miscellaneous Expenses
541.00'
Contractual Services
37,056.00
Public Works Personnel Overtime Costs
48,315.02
Estimated Total Cleanup Costs
$115,785.0,
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
June 17, 1992 Storm Cleanup Cost Schedule
Page of I of 5
Report Date. July 6, 1992
Ff Ecz—!jipmeni---', —Rental Agency --- Rental Terms cost
Vermeer 1250 Chipper
Route 12 Rentals
2 weeks @ $840/week
$1,680.00
Vermeer 1250 Chipper
Route 12 Rentals
10 days @ $840/week
1.470.00
+ $210/day
Vermeer 1250 Chipper
Route 12 Rentals
2 days @ $21 O/day
420.00
Vermeer 1600 Chipper
Route 12 Rentals
4 days @ $185/day
740.00
Chainsaw
Route 12 Rentals
1 weeks @ $320/week
360.00
+1 day $40/day
Chainsaw
Route 12 Rentals
1 week @ $320/week
360.00
+ 1 day $40/day
Chainsaw
Route 12 Rentals
1 week $320/week
360.00
+1 day $40/day
Chainsaw
Route 12 Rentals
1 day @ $40/day
40.00
Chainsaw
Route 12 Rentals
I day @ $40/day
40.00
Chainsaw
Route 12 Rentals
I day @ $40/day
40.00
Vermeer 1220 Chipper
Vermeer
1 week @ $850/week
850.00
Vermeer 1250 Chipper
Vermeer
1 week @ $850/week
850.00
Aerial Truck
ITEC Rentals
2 weeks @ $900/week
1,800.00
Rental costs. $910,10.00
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
June 17, 1992 Storm Cleanup Cost Schedule
Page of 2 of 5
Report Date: July 6, 1992
e rnmental Assistance
Agency-- Description & Terms of Assistance cost
rove Labor only: 38 hours @ $19.05/hr $764.92
Equipment: Chipper & Truck for 2 days NO CHARGE I
Des Plaines
Labor only: 118.50 hours@ $23.25/hr (avg.)
2,755.19
185.00
Equipment: 3 Chippers & 3 Trucks for 2 days
56.00
Total miscellab#0 I U slcostk
- -----------
NO CHARGE
Elk Grove Village
Labor: 87.50 hours @ $22.25/hr (avg.) $1,947.00
Equipment: I Chipper, I Truck, & I Pickup
Overhead Charge: 35% $681.45
Total Charge:
2,630.00
Hoffman Estates
Labor & Equipment 72 hours @ $35.19/hr
2,533.44
(includes overhead charge)
Mount Prospect Park Dist.
Labor: 148.50 hours @ $14.68/hr (avg.)
2,179.61
Palatine
Labor: 22 hours NO CHARGE
0.00
Equipment: 1 Chipper & I Truck NO CHARGE
0.00
$
s
Misceffaneous�co ts
.. . ....... .
Meals, Etc...
$ 300.00
Safety Glasses
185.00
Ear Plugs
56.00
Total miscellab#0 I U slcostk
- -----------
$$41.00
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
June 17, 1992 Storm Cleanup Cost Schedule
Page of 3 of 5
Report Date: July 6, 1992
Johnson Tree Service
contract) Personnel: $13,708.50
360.75 hours @ $38/hr
Equipment 4,206.25
168.25 hours @ $25/hr
Log Disposal. 1,012.50
iney & Son, Inc.
Log Disposal: 2,505.00
334 cubic yards @ $7.50/cu yd
er Trucking Co.
Wood Chip Disposal. 11,394.00
108 loads @ $105.50 avg. rate/load
(hourly rate = $46)
Street Sweepings Disposal. 1,200.00
16 loads @ $75/load
sal Co. Wood Chip Disposal. 3,300.00
12 loads @ $275/load
'iac t,Ual Services
$37,326.25
Mount Prospect Pub1fic Whorks 1a --
Storm Crew Overtime - Cnst Sr_hn**,vIa Rnnnrt l?sarrn Q of 1
# Name
6117
6118
6119
6/10
6121
6122
6123
6124
6125
6126 s
6127
6128 6129
6130 Total
37 A ent, Eddie
6.5
7
4
9
$ 1,634.87
2
2
2
2
3
$1,529.89
8
45.5
22 Aspen, Kurt
5.5
$ 22.50
4
$ 22.50
9
$ 22.50
$ 680.63
$ 22.50
$1,364.87
$ 22.50
9
8
35.5
1 Bautista, Santos
6
8
4
$ 22.50
9
2
$ 547.45
2
2
2
$ 753.68
6
41
7 Dowd, Paul
8.5
87
23.5
9 Erler, Tim
5.5
6.5
3
7
2
2
2
28
54 Erskine, Con
8.5
8
9
9
11
8
53.5
41 Finney, Butch
6
1
8
14
12 Gomez Andy
6
4.5
4
9
2
2
3
3
4
8
45.5
14 Guerrero, Frank
6.5
7.5
4
9
9
2
2
1
1
6
11
8
67
15 Hansen, Don
4
4
9
13
10
10
5
5
60
16 Huffman, John
8.5
8
4
9
-29.5
53 Jensen, Walt
6.5
7
3.5
9
9
2
2
2
2
3
11
6
63
18 Kaiser, Mike
5.5
4.5
91
11
30
19 Lehnert, Don
6
9
91
1
1
8
32
52 Mallari, Macario
5.5
8.5
4
9
91
2
21
2
2
2
7
53
25 Nordin, Jim
6.5
3
9
9
11
8
46.5
26 Patrasso, Tony
5.75
4.5
9
11
30.25
27 Pohlmann, John
8.5
5.5
4
9
9
11
8
55
28 Riley, Scott
6.5
9
2.5
9
9
44.5
4
4
4
13
8
77.5
34 Schwandt, Alan
6
0.5
9
9
11
8
43.5
35 Schwei er, Mike
6.25
6.51
3.5
8.5
2
4
3
3
1
1
37.75
36 Stanley, Larry
5.5
6
7
1
1
1
11
29.5
38 Steinmiller, Fred
5.75
4
9
91
2
1
6
35.75
39 Stephenson, Mike
2
2
11
7
22
40 Strzelczyk, Joel
8.5
8
3.5
9
2
2
2
2
2
39
42 Udelhofen, Kelly
6
7.5
4
9
2
2
30.5
43 U olini, Rich
6
7.5
1
9
11
6
40.5
44 Villareal, Joel
5.75
20
3.5
9
9
2
2
2
2
55.25
Rate "
Total
$ 22.50
$1,083.69
$ 22.50
$ 926.12
$ 22.50
$1,034.89
$ 22.50
$ 581.20
$ 22.50
$ 630.00
$ 22.50
$1,331.12
$ 22.50
$ 374.94
$ 22.50
$ 1,151.12
$ 22.50
$ 1,634.87
$ 22.50
$ 1,454.90
$ 22.50
$ 663.75
$ 22.50
$1,529.89
$ 22.50
$ 742.43
$ 22.50
$ 847.37
$ 22.50
$ 1,312.38
$ 22.50
$1,173.62
$ 22.50
$ 680.63
$ 22.50
$1,364.87
$ 22.50
$ 1,871.12
$ 22.50
$1,106.12
$ 22.50
$ 849.38
$ 22.50
663,75
$663Z7
$ 22.50
$ 916.76
$ 22.50
$ 547.45
$ 22.50
$ 944,93
$ 22.50
$ 753.68
$ 22.50
$1,023.64
$ 22.50
$1,310.56
$ 22.50 $ 954.32
$ 22.50
$ 607.43
$ 22.50
$1,094.87
$ 22.50
$ 768.71
$ 22.50
$1,252.37
fi Doolittle, Bob 7.5 1.5 2 11 $ 22,50 $ 247.50
31 Rossbach, John 8.51 81 91 1 1 1 125.5 $ 22.50 1 $ 641 18
Faramna
2 Boesche, Dave
3.25
$ 596.18
$ 22.50
$ 778.07
11
8
22.25
4 Castro, Jose
4.5
1
9
9
23.5
5 DeLuca, Frank
6
6 2.25
11
7
32.25
10 Gallas, Joe
8.5
5.5 4
9.5
9
2 2 2 3 2 12
7
66.5
23 Murphy, John
5.5
9
8
22.5
14 Neururer, Mike
7
6.25 4.25
9.5
9
12
8
56
33 Schultz, Wally
6.5
8.5 d
10
9
4 4 5 5 5 13
9
83
Sunday hours are paid at a double-time rate
$ 22.50 $ 560.57
$ 22.50
$ 596.18
$ 22.50
$ 778.07
$ 22.50
$ 1,616.13
$22.50
$566.i9
$ 22.50
$1,387.37
$ 22.50
$ 2,002.37
77-I Prospect Public Works July 6, 1992
Storm Crew Overtime - Cost Schedule Report Page 5 of 5
# IName 1 6117 6118 1 6119 620 621 6122 1 6123 1 6124 1 6125 1 6126 1 6127 1 628 1 629 1 6130 1 Total Rafe * Totat�
Part Time
$ 12.50 $ 18.75
$12.50
$ 237.48
$ 12.50
Eal
$ 12.50
It 25.00
$ 178.20
$ 12.50 $ 18.75
$12.50
$ 237.48
$ 12.50
$ 50.00
$ 12.50
It 25.00
$ 178.20
$ 9.38
$ 112.56
$ 9.38
$ 23.45
$9.38
$121.94
$9.381
$103.18
$ 9.38
$ 355.63
$ 9.38
$ 211.05
$ 9.38
$ 178.22
$ 9.38
$ 364.23
$ 9.38
$145.39
$ 9.38
$ 362.67
HIM
$ 12.50 $ 18.75
$12.50
$ 237.48
$ 12.50
$ 50.00
$ 12.50
It 25.00
$ 9.38
$ 103.18
$ 9.38
$ 182.91
$ 9.38
$ 101.59
$ 9.38
$ 178.20
$ 9.38
$ 112.56
$ 9.38
$ 23.45
$9.38
$121.94
$9.381
$103.18
$ 9.38
$ 355.63
$ 9.38
$ 211.05
$ 9.38
$ 178.22
$ 9.38
$ 364.23
$ 9.38
$145.39
$ 9.38
$ 362.67
$ 20.06 $ 344.33
$ 37.86
$ 1,968.72
$ 21.00
$143.47
$ 22.50
$ 569.F5-
69.95$20.52
$20.52
$102.60
$ 12.50
$ 56.25
$ 35.70
$ 725.82
Grand Total $ 48,365.02
Sunday tours are paid at a double-time rate
* Average hourly overtime rates
** Clerical employees for answering telephones 8 radios
*** Acutal overtime hourly rates
STORM OF 6/17/92
COMPLETED TREE WORK
Tree Removals 95 trees, estimated value $158,886.00 using
ISA formula
Hanger Removal 554 trees
TREE WORK NOT COMPLETED YET
Hanger Removal - 169 trees. More are being reported daily
Stump Removals - 95 stumps (more as removals continue)
WOOD WASTE GENERATED
90 cubic yards hauled to a free farm site north
of Mount Prospect.
390 cubic yards hauled to wood waste recycling
sites for a charge per yard.
Wood Chips* 550 cubic yards hauled.to Mr. Prospect
residences, schools and businesses
2616 cubic yards hauled -to compost sites, nurser-
ies, etc.
Wood Chip and Log Totals include privatepropertydebris
picked up during street cleanup. We estimate that about 60% of
the brush we picked up was from private property.
LONG-TERM IMPACTS
Dutch Elm Disease loss rate will probably increase due to
extensive wounding of elm trees, and delay in removing diseased
trees.
If many people request tree replacements on cost -share program,
our reduced tree planting budget may be inadequate.
Storm -related Removals by Diameter: June 17-30,1992
Total of 95 Trees Removed
25.3
119
19-24"
12%
49-54 "
1%
37-42 " 1-8 "
MAR �� 4% g./
13-18 "
38%
7-12 •'
21%
Storm -Related Removals: • e
Total of 95 Trees Removed
Callery Pear 6%
Thornless Haneylocust
3°%
Green Ash
21%
Norway Maple
16%
Red Maple
5%
Silver Maple
15°%
Sugar Maple
5°%