HomeMy WebLinkAbout4457_001Next Ordinance No. 4428
Next Resolution No. 14-92
A G E N D A
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, let Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
May 5, 1992
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald 118kipl, Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Wilks
IV. APPROVE MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, April 21, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. Heroic Service Awards:
Firefighter/Paramedic Mark Wojtkiewicz
Firefighter/Paramedic Mike Klees
Firefighter/Paramedic Dale Steward
Firefighter/Paramedic Tim Cunningham
B. Commendations for Outstanding Service:
Firefighter/Paramedic Randy Werderitch
Lt. Dan Ackerman
Lt. Mike Figolah
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Request to authorize the Holiday Inn to continue
operating under an existing Class "A" liquor
license. The corporate ownership structure will
change as of June 30, 1992.
B. Request to create one additional Class "R" liquor
license for a new restaurant, to be known as
Chungkiwa Restaurant, at 1631-33 South Busse Road.
C. Appointments
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
ALL
IX.
NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 17-V-92, 1500 - 1522 North Elmhurst Road
The Petitioner is requesting a variation from
Section 14.3012 to allow a reduction in the
number of required parking spaces for this
shopping center, located at the southwest
corner of Elmhurst and Camp Mc Donald Roads,
from 116 to 70 to allow a Class III restaurant
(Lou Malnati carry -out) to occupy a portion
of the building. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0.
B. ZBA 19-V-92 and ZBA 20 -SU -92, 1230 S. Prairie Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting a variation from
Section 14.115.0 to allow a driveway width of 31 feet,
rather than the permitted 21 feet. Also requested is
a Special Use to allow a garage designed to house
more than 2 vehicles. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
C. ZBA 21 -SU -92, 102 Hatlen Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting a special Use to allow
a garage designed to house more than 2 vehicles.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
D. ZBA 22-V-92, 1308 North Lama Lane
The Petitioner is requesting variations from
Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway
and from Section 14.1102.A to allow 48% of the
front yard to be covered with impervious surface
rather than the permitted 35%. By a unanimous
vote, the Zoning Board recommended denying this
request.
E. ZBA 23 -SU -92, 309 North Westgate
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use to
allow a satellite dish ten feet in radius. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
F. ZBA 24-V-92, 508 South Owen Street
The Petitioner is requesting a variation from
Section 14.1103 to allow a Floor Area Ratio of .46
rather than the permitted .35 in order to construct
a second story addition and sun room to an existing
single family home. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
G. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE TOWNHOMES GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF MAPLE
AND LINCOLN STREETS AND THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT RELATIVE TO PARKING
H. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 4311, GRANTING A VARIATION FOR THE CHICAGO
ASSEMBLY OF GOD, 618 EAST GOLF ROAD, BY EXTENDING
THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR ONE ADDITIONAL YEAR
(Exhibit A)
(Exhibit B)
I. A RESOLUTION IN LIEU OF A SURETY BOND IN
N. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance authorizes the sales of miscellaneous
property owned by the Village, as well as some
abandoned and confiscated property, through
an auction on Saturday, May 16th. (Exhbiit F)
X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. 2 dump trucks
2. Crack Seal Bid
B. Proposals to plaster the Historical Museum,
101 South Maple Street
C. Accept proposal for Construction Engineer for
the Can Dota/Wa Pella Central stormwater
management project.
D. Change Work Order #2 for the Police and Fire
Headquarters building.
E. Proposals for design engineer for senior Citizen
Center addition
F. Update for costs incurred for emergency sewer
repair, 202 South Owen
G. Status report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
ORDER TO PERFORM SPECIFIED CONSTRUCTION WORK
WITHIN STATE OF ILLINOIS RIGHTS-OF-WAY
(Exhibit C)
J.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING RELATIVE TO
MAINTENANCE OF ROADWAYS UNDER THE
JURISDICTION OF THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION
This Agreement authorizes the Village to undertake
certain projects without prior approval from
IDOT.
(Exhibit D)
K.
Accept improvements installed in conjunction
with the development of Mutoh-American,
500 West Algonquin Road
L.
Accept improvements installed in conjunction
with the development of J & L Industrial Supply,
2200 South Busse Road
M.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A SETTLEMENT IN THE LAW
SUIT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE AND COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS
(Exhibit E)
N. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance authorizes the sales of miscellaneous
property owned by the Village, as well as some
abandoned and confiscated property, through
an auction on Saturday, May 16th. (Exhbiit F)
X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. 2 dump trucks
2. Crack Seal Bid
B. Proposals to plaster the Historical Museum,
101 South Maple Street
C. Accept proposal for Construction Engineer for
the Can Dota/Wa Pella Central stormwater
management project.
D. Change Work Order #2 for the Police and Fire
Headquarters building.
E. Proposals for design engineer for senior Citizen
Center addition
F. Update for costs incurred for emergency sewer
repair, 202 South Owen
G. Status report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MBETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APRIL 21, 1992
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee George Clowes - arrived late
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Floras. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Regular meeting of the APPROVE
Mayor and Board of Trustees held April 7, 1992 MINUTES
were presented as well -as the addendum to the
minutes of the March 17, 1992 meeting.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros,
moved to approve the Addendum to the minutes
of the March 17, 1992 meeting and the minutes
of the Regular meeting of the Mayor and Board
of Trustees held April 7, 1992.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floros, Hoefert, Farley
Pass: Corcoran
Present: Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, APPROVE BILIS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$1,136,530
Refusal Disposal Fund
397,355
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
13,332
Community Development Block Grant Fund
6,528
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
147,663
Water & Sewer Fund
411,894
Parking System Revenue Fund
5,177
Risk Management Fund
114,330
Vehicle Replacement Fund
822
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.
17,515
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
135
Fire & Police Building Const,
237,194
Flood Control Revenue Fund
-
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
15,000
Flexcomp Trust Fund
9,676
Escrow Deposit Fund
34,937
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
-
Benefit Trust Fund
$2,550,255
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FINANCIAL
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
REPORT
to accept the Financial Report dated March 31, 1992,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
PROCLAMATIONS:
Mayor Parley proclaimed May, 1992 as Senior Citizen
SENIOR CITIZEN
Month in Mount Prospect.
MONTH
Mayor Farley proclaimed the week of May 10 - 16, 1992
EMERGENCY MEDICAL
Emergency Medical Services Week in Mount Prospect.
SERVICES WEEK
Mayor Farley also proclaimed the week of May 3 - 9,
CHILDREN'S FIRE
1992 as Children's Fire Safety Week in the Village.
SAFETY WEEK
Clarence Bobikewicz, 1114 Meadow Lane, stated that the
new home being built behind his house was at a much
higher elevation than his property and expressed
concern relative to flooding.
A representative of the River Trails Community
Association stated that discussions are on-going
relative to the proposed Euclid Avenue widening
project.
MAYOROS REPORT
AMEND CH. 13
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
NON-ALCOHOLIC
would expand the definition of Alcoholic Liquor to
BEVERAGES
include near -beer and products advertised as non-
alcoholic.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
amend the proposed Ordinance amending Chapter 13 by
adding "...beverages containing anything more than
.00% as Alcoholic Liquor" within the definition of
near -beer and non-alcoholic beverages.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4415
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
passage of Ordinance NO. 4415
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF
THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Fl6ros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 9-Z-92 ZBA 9-Z-92, 2320 West Lincoln Street
2320 LINCOLN ST An Ordinance was presented for second reading
that would rezone the subject property from R -X,
granted upon annexation, to R-1 (Single Family
Page 2 - April 21, 1992
Residence District) in order to permit a 3 lot
single family home subdivision. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
ORD.NO. 4416
for passage of ordinance No. 4416
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AS IT
PERTAINS TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
2320 WEST LINCOLN STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was also presented for second reading
DEVELOPMENT
relative to the property commonly known as
CODE
2320 West Lincoln. This Ordinance grants
MODIFICATIONS
modifications from the Development Code by waiving
installation of the required storm sewers until a
future date; to permit a Restrictive Covenant
guaranteeing installation of street lights at such
time as the Village determines appropriate; and,
to provide a 10 year period during which the
residents of these homes would not be assessed for
street improvements.
Frank Vlazny, 2103 Jody Court, expressed "concern
relative to the drainage in that area and asked
why the Village wasn't requiring the developer to
install storm sewers.
It was explained that there are no storm sewers
in the area for the developer to connect to therefore
this improvement will be made at a future date.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
ORD.NO. 4417
for passage of Ordinance No. 4417
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR THE LINCOLN -HICKORY
SUBDIVISION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Hickory -Lincoln Plat of Subdivision was presented
HICKORY -
for approval. This Plat of Subdivision would create
LINCOLN
3 lots for single family homes.
SUBDIVISION
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his
signature on the Hickory -Lincoln Plat of Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 - April 21, 1992
ZBA 14-V-92 ZBA 14-V-92, 2320 West White Oak
2320 WHITE OAK An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to reduce the required 40 foot front
yard setback for the subject property, zoned R -X, in
order to build a room addition. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of
7-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4418 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4418
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2320 WHITE OAK
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 16-V-92 ZBA 16-V-92, 906 See Gwun
906 SEE GWUN An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to increase the maximum driveway
width from 15 feet to 20 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of
7-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert
Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4419 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4419
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 906 SEE GWUN
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 13-A-92 ZBA 13-A-92, Text Amendment
TEXT AMENDMENT An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
amend Section 14.107 of the Zoning Ordinance relative
to non -conforming structures and uses. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these amendments
by a vote of 6-1.
Page 4 - April 21, 1992
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks moved
ORD.NO. 4420
for passage of ordinance No. 4420
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF
CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
WATER
would authorize the Village of Mount Prospect to
POLLUTION
participate in the Water Pollution Control
CONTROL
Revolving Fund.
FUND
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
ORD.NO. 4421
for passage of ordinance No. 4421
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT TO BORROW FUNDS FROM THE
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
AMEND CH.9
would amend Article I of Chapter 9 of the Village
SIDEWALK
Code to clarify the area necessary for pedestrian
CAFES
traffic in conjunction with sidewalk cafes.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
ORD.NO. 4422
for passage of ordinance No. 4422
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 9
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
AMEND CH.23
would amend Article I of Chapter 23 of the Village
DISORDERLY
Code. This amendment establishes the prohibition
CONDUCT
of drinking alcoholic beverages on public,
commercial and multi -family properties.
Page 5 - April 21, 1992
ORD.NO. 4423
Trustee Wilke, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4423
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I ENTITLED
"DISORDERLY CONDUCT" OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Notion carried.
AMEND CH.23
An ordinance was presented for second reading that
LANDLORD TENANT
would amend the Landlord Tenant regulations by
prohibiting the drinking of alcoholic beverages in
parking lots and common areas.
ORD.NO. 4424
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4424
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVIII OF CHAPTER 23
ENTITLED "LANDLORD AND TENANT REGULATIONS" OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Clowes arrived at this point in the meeting.
AMEND CH.22
An ordinance was presented for second reading that
WATER & SEWER
would increase the water and sewer rates. The cost of
RATE INCREASE
water would be increased from $2.62 to $2.75 per 1,000
gallons.
ORD. NO. 4425
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4425
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V ENTITLED
"METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 11
An ordinance was presented for second reading that
INSPECTIONS:
would amend Article XXXIV of Chapter 11 (Business
FOOD
License) to provide for 4 inspections for food
ESTABLISHMENTS
establishments, rather than the existing 6 inspections.
Additional fees would be charged for establishments
requiring more than the 4 inspections.
ORD.NO. 4426
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4426
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XXXIV OF
CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - April 21, 1992
PUBLIC HEARING PUBLIC
Mayor Farley called the Public Hearing to order HEARING:
at 8:20 P.M. 92/93 BUDGET
The purpose of the Public Hearing, called pursuant
to proper legal notice having been published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on April 8, 1992,
was to consider adoption of the annual budget
for fiscal year 1992/92.
Mayor Farley noted that the total amount of the
proposed budget was $45,321,300.00.
There was discussion relative to the Governor's
announcement that the surcharge tax allocated
for local governmental bodies will probably be
discontinued. This could present a financial
hardship on many communities, however, Mount Prospect
has developed a contingency plan if the surcharge
tax is not received from the State.
Frank Vlazny, 2103 Jody Court, asked the Village
to limit the levy being requested by the Mount Prospect
Public Library to the maximum amount approved by
the voters in the last referendum. Mr. Vlazny-also
expressed concern that the amount of sales tax
received by the Village appears to be -lower than
budgeted.
Trustee Corcoran stated that while the original
budget included $50,000 for 'new technology', which
had been eliminated due to the possible loss of the
surcharge tax, the Village Board would be able to
authorize funds for this purpose if the need arises.
There being no further discussion on the proposed
budget, Mayor Farley declared the Public Hearing
closed at 8:35 P.M.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would adopt the annual budget for fiscal year
1992/83.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved ORD.NO. 4427
for passage of ordinance No. 4427
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR FISCAL
YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1992 TO APRIL 30, 1993
IN LIEU OF PASSAGE OF AN APPROPRIATION
ORDINANCE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: Clowes
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
A Resolution was presented that would authorize EXECUTIVE
the release of minutes of specific Executive SESSION
Sessions. MINUTES
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved RES.NO. 12-92
Page 7 - April 21, 1992
for passage of Resolution No. 12-92
Page 8 - April 21, 1992
A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RELEASE OF
EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES
Upon roll call; Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NAME PUBLIC
A Resolution was presented that sets forth the
PLACES POLICY
policy of the Village Board as it relates to naming
public places, buildings and/or streets.
RES.NO. 13-92
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 13-92
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A POLICY
ON NAMING PUBLIC PLACES
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CONSIDER ITEM
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
NOT LISTED ON
consider an item not listed on the agenda, specifically
AGENDA
the name of the new Fire and Police Station under
construction.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW FIRE &
Trustee Wilks noted that during a recent Committee
POLICE BLDG.
of the Whole meeting, the Village Board had discussed
NAME
the name for the new Fire and Police Station Building
(112 East Northwest Highway) formerly the Public Safety
Building. Following discussion, it was the consensus
of opinion that the new building be named the "Mount
Prospect Police and Fire Headquarters". It was also
the decision of the Board that the building be
dedicated for Robert D. Teichert, Village Trustee from
1965 through 1969 and Village President from 1969
through 1977 for his many contributions during a period
of considerable growth in the Village. A plaque
acknowledging the dedication to Robert D. Teichert will
be displayed in the building. Also, a plaque
acknowledging the Citizens Committee, helpful in
supporting a referendum asking residents if they would
support construction of a new building, will also be
displayed.
Trustee Wilks, seconded Trustee Corcoran, moved to
adopt the official name of the new Fire and Police
Station as the "Mount Prospect Police and Fire
Headquarters".
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion'carried.
Page 8 - April 21, 1992
VILLAGE Y.ANAGER*S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
BIDS:
following bid results on various items.
The following bids were received for high -service
HIGH
pump modifications for pumping stations #16
SERVICE
and #17:
PUMPS
Bidder Amount
Tri -Con Corporation $65,860
A. J. Lowe & Son, Inc. 74,413
Advance Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 74,600
M.J. Carboy Company 82,100
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
TRI -CON
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
CORP.
and accept the low qualified bid submitted by Tri -Con
Corporation in the amount of $65,860 for modifications
to the high -service pumps at pumping stations 16 and 17.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the rehabilitation
COMMUTER
of the east and center commuter parking lots, including
PARKING
replacing deteriorated asphalt curb and new concrete
LOTS
curbs and pavement restoration:
Bidder Amount
Martam Construction $45,597
Alliance Contractors, Inc. 75,255
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
MARTAM
concur with the recommendation of the administration
CONST.
and accept the low qualified bid submitted by Martam
Construction in the amount of $46,057 for the
rehabilitation of the commuter parking lots.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented from administration to RESURFACING
authorize an increase in the contract with Allied PROJECT -
Asphalt Company for the 1990 resurfacing project. 1990
It was noted that the original contract, authorized ALLIED
May 7, 1990, for $262,174.35. Additional work was ASPHALT
required, not included in the original contract,
to make temporary patching on Waverly Avenue and
Huntington Commons Road. Taking into consideration
the 5% retainage, as specified in the original
contract, and with the additional work, the amount
over the authorized contract totals $13,492.32.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert,
moved to authorize an increase to the contract
Page 9 - April 21, 1992
with Allied Asphalt by $13,492.32 for a total contract
amount of $269,846.48.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
EMERGENCY A request was presented from staff to ratify the action
SEWER REPAIRS of the Village Manager to authorize emergency repairs
to a 24" combined sewer generally located at 202 South
Owen. It was noted that the repairs necessary were
beyond the ability of Public Works equipment and
therefore a proposal was requested from a local
contractor, Rossetti. Not knowing the exact amount of
work involved, Rossetti submitted a cost of
approximately $15,000.
ROSSETTI Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to ratify the action of the Village Manager in
authorizing the emergency repairs to the sewer
generally located at 202 South Owen Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
HYDRANT Village Manager Dixon informed the Board that hydrant
FLUSHING flushing will be taking place during the week.
SOLICITATION Mr. Dixon stated that there is a telephone solicitation
program being conducted within the Village by the North
Suburban Professional Firefighters Association. Mr.
Dixon stated that the soliciting organization is a
union and does not represent the Village Fire
Department.
NTN SIGNS
Trustee Floros asked for clarification of a legal
opinion the Board received from Pedersen & Houpt
relative to the NTN signs installed on Kensington Road.
These signs were the subject of a recent discussion by
the Village Board as to whether a field change should
be granted allowing the signs to remain on the berms.
Mayor Farley stated that the legal opinion, which
expresses the opinion of legal counsel, is that the NTN
signs are permitted and can remain as installed.
BROADACRE
Trustee Clowes asked the status of the proposal for the
DOWNTOWN
downtown redevelopment. Mayor Farley stated that
DEVELOPMENT
discussion on this subject is scheduled to take place
PLAN
at the Committee of the Whole meeting on May 12th.
WELLER CREEK
Trustee Clowes also asked that Board consider the
EROSION
erosion of Weller Creek as a possible future project
for the Village.
SOLID WASTE
Trustee Clowes stated that a recent Galliton report
indicates that the private sector could provide solid
waste disposal at a lower cost than SWANCC.
Page 10 - April 21, 1992
EXECUTIVE SESSION EXECUTIVE
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, SESSION
moved to adjourn into Executive Session for the
purpose of discussing litigation and personnel.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Board went into Executive Session at 9:05 P.M.
The Board reconvened at 10:03 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Busse
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Floros
Trustee Hoefert
Trustee Wilks
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved HOMES BY
to authorize the Village Manager to retain legal HEMPHILL
counsel for the purpose of defending the law suit
filed by Homes by Hemphill against the Village of
Mount Prospect.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:05 PM.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 11 - April 21, 1992
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
April 30, 1992
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
4/17/92 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
4/30/92
List o£ Bills
Entry 4/30192
General & Special Revenue Funds4/16/92
General Fund
$ 3,268,978
$ 803,545
$ 505,126
$ 3,567,397
Refuse Disposal Fund
91,729
32,820
29,002
95,547
Motor Fuel Tax
681,844
-
17,124
664,720
Community Development Block Grant Fund
21,206
-
1,683
19,523
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
115,531
22,783
11,027
127,287
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,468,044
141,314
122,206
3,487,152
Parking System Revenue
201,487
7,195
1,973
206,709
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,235,672
203,691
66,328
1,373,035
Vehicle Replacement Fund
457,356
550
1,488
456,418
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,598,834
69,156
19,068
1,648,922
Downtown Redev Const Funds
564,029
564,029
Police & Fire Building Construction
5,087,807
-
39,370
5,048,437
Flood Control Construction Fund
4,820,027
-
189,185
4,630,842
Debt Service Funds
1,181,552
26,922
10
1,208,464
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
5,085
-
419
4,666
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,410,951
10,089
46,888
1,374,152
Police Pension Fund
17,245,958
125,696
42,972
17,328,682
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,215,718
28,081
48,698
19,195,101
Benefit Trust Funds
238A70
8 000
246,970
$60.910.778
$1.479.842
$1.142,567
$ $61,248.053
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ACME SPRINKLER
ALLSTYLE BUILDERS
AMERICAN MALL INT.
RICHARD BARRETT
MICHAEL BARTCZYSZYN
BROOKFIELD
JOHN CAGLE SEWER
CITIBANK,N.A.
R. E. CORTELLONI
JAMES CZARNIK
GERALD P. DEMPSEY
DESIGN GROUP SIGNAGE CORP
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
DOUBLE A & M ENTEPRISES INC.
ESTATE OF R. 0. BRADLEY
EZELL BUILDING CONSTR.CO.,INC.
FLOWER WORLD
FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE
ENZO FREDIANI
GEORGE'S GYROS
THOMAS GIBBONS
JOSEPH GUARINO
HAND CAR WASH & DETAILING
THOMAS HELLER
IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE
HENRY JASZCZUROWSKI
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C3639 ACME SPRINKLER
$100.00
$100.00
C8227 ALLSTYLE BLDRS
$50.00
$50.00
C10634 AMERICAN MALL
$100.00
$100.00
C10171 BARRETT RICHARD
$100.00
$100.00
ANIMAL LICENSE OVERPMT
$2.50
$2.50
MAY EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM
$10,461.59
$10,461.59
C3906 CAGLE SEWER
$50.00
$50.00
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS GAB
$4,541.67
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS-GAB$4,
.90
$8,837.57
REFUND DUPLICATE PMT
$40
$4000
$40.00
RE TR TAX REBATE
$$20..20.00
$ 20.00
REFUND VEHICLE STICKER
$
$00
$20.00
NINE PERMIT REFUNDS
$225.00
$225.00
P/R ENDING 4/30192
$39,186.41
P/R ENDING 4/30192
$1,274.36
P/R ENDING 4/30/92
$728.58
P/R ENDING 4J/30
$381,303.65
%192
$lr$75.00 1.83
$424,$75.00*
BUSINESSNLICENSE90VERPMT
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$26.79
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.17
$28.96
C10514 EZELL BLDG
$75.00
$75.00
C10513 FLOWER WORLD
$500.00
C10638 FLOWER WORLD
$70.00
$570.00
14AY92 LIFE INSURANCE
$2,128.89
$2,128.89
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.88
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$28.56
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.81
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$8.36
$40.61
010493 GEORGES GYROS
$70.00
$70.00
C8689 GIBBONS THOMAS
$100.00
$100.00
C4955 GUARIMO JOSEPH
$75.00
$75.00
1526 HAND CARWASH
$100.00
$100.00
920111 C10322 HELLER T
$50.00
$50.00
MAY1992
$225.00
$225.00
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
KIEFFER SIGN CO.
DOROTHY L. KLOTZ
BOB KOPKE
LAKE -COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY
LITGEN CONCRETE CUTTING & COR
LORENS RODDING & PLUMBING
LYNDA MARAM
LEONA MARTENS
KENNY MCLEOD
ZBIGNIEW MROCZKA
RANDALL MYERS
NATIONAL SIGNS INC.
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
PECK JONES CONSTRUCTION
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTMASTER
RAINBOW SIGNS
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
ROBERT L. SKUMMER
LOWELL SLACK
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PMT P/R 4/30j92
$254.00
$254.00
1500 KI FFEER SIGN
$100.00
1501 KIEFFER SIGN CO
$100.00
$200.00
REFUND AMBULANCE PMT
$105.92
$105.92
C10516 KOPKE
$100.00
$100.00
THERMOLENE
$6,967.10
CREDIT
$6,967.10-
THERMOLENE
$5,560.10
$5,560.10
VEHICLE STICKERS REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
C10663 LORENS PLBG
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
REFUND AMBULANCE PMT
$105.92
$105.92
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
010492 MROCZKA
$35.00
$35.00
REFUND STICKER OVERPMTS
$20.00
$20.00
1513 NATIONAL SIGNS
$100.00
$100.00
SAVINGS BONDS P R 4/30/92
$550.00
DUE TO FED DEP PZR 4/1
$1,267.28
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 4/16
$123.51
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 4/16
$62.29
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 4/16
$11,026.65
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 4/16
$2,673.88
DUE TO FED DEP P R 4/16
$55.24
$15,758.85*
010405 PECK JONES
$100.00
$100.00
APR POLICE PENSION DISB
$42,971.80
APR FIRE PENSION DISB
$48,698.38
$91,670.18*
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.00
POSTAGE METER ADV DEP
$3,000.00
$3,000.00*
POSTAGE STAMPS
$580.00
$580.00*
1498 RAINBOW SIGNS
$100.00
$100.00
FACILITIES PLAN
$2,998.79
$2,998.79
C9566 SKUMMER
$100.00
$100.00
C10562 SLACK
$50.00*
920422 BOND MONEY
$2j$$550.0000
920424 BOND MONEY
$450.00
920429 BOND MONEY
$1,250.00
$4,600.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
JOHN VERBEECK
VEHICLE STICKER REFUND
$20.00
$20.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APRIL TSFR TO CAP IMP FUND
$1,949.00
$1,949.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
3029C/D S LYNN CT
$82.50*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
C102788 MAJ CONST
$35.00
C10303 DO IT RIGHT ROOTER
$100.00
C10493 GEORGES GYROS
$30.00
C10514 EZELL BLDG
$25.00
C10638 FLOWER WORLD
$30.00
C3669 MARTIN LEBDA
$50.00
C3669 MARTIN LEBDA
$100.00
C3906 CAGLE
$50.00
C4955 GUARINO
$25.00
C8227 ALLSTYLE BLDRS
$50.00
C8421 HONEYBEE MEDCON
$500.00
920111 C10332 H LLER
$50.00
$1,045.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APRIL TSFR TO GENERAL FUND
$418.67
APRIL TSFR TO GENERAL FUND
$23,446.98
APRIL TSFR TO FLOOD CONTROL CONST
91 $10.00
APRIL TSFR TO GENERAL FUND
$3,975.09
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$12,233.00
$40,083.74
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APRIL TSFR TO IMRF FUND
$21,975.00
APRIL TSFR TO IMRF FUND
$1,045.16
APRIL TSFR TO IMRF FUND
$345.90
APRIL TSFR TO IMRF FUND
$12x610.68
APRIL TSFR TO IMRF FUND
$246.78
$36,223.52
VILLAGE SEWER
C10561 VILLAGE SEWER
$100.00
$100.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$653,707.47
GENERAL FUND
$396,956.82 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$28x055.43
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$1,682.55 ILL. MUNICIPAL
RETIREMENT FUND
$,026.65
WATER & SEWER FUND
$54,540.54 PARKING SYSTEM
REVENUE FUND
$1
$1x
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$21,428.05 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & I 1991A
$10.600.00
$1x698.38
POLICE PENSION FUND
$42,971.80 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$48
GENERAL FUND
$183.80
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ABM, INC. 2 IMAGING CARTRIDGES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$116.00
PAGE 4
$127.48
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$141.15
PAYMENT DATE 4/30192
$434.70
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$418.67 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$46,887.98
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
$1,193.25
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES$499.50
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
100 75TH BRICK PLATES
$97.50
$97.50
MOUNT PROSPECT JAYCEES
BANQUET-FARLEYS
$25.00
$25.00*
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$11.30
$11.30*
SAUGANASH COMMUNITY CHURCH
MEMORIAL ALTANAH CHULAY
$50.00
$50.00*
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
SERVICES RENDERED
***TOTAL**
$183.80
GENERAL FUND
$183.80
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ABM, INC. 2 IMAGING CARTRIDGES
$116.00
$116.00
ARNSTEIN & LEHR MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$127.48
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$141.15
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$434.70
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$333.70
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$111.00
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$3,953.60
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$1,193.25
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES$499.50
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$155.40
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$256.20
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$784.70
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$12.00
$8,002.68
CERTIFIED REPORTING COMPANY SERVICES RENDERED
$388.05
SERVICES RENDERED
$157.25
$545.30
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4%30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
IPMA-CHICAGO METRO CHAPTER
REGISTER -RUSSELL
$55.00
$55.00
JOHN F. DIXON
ADVANCED EXPENSES
$110.00
$110.00*
HEWLETT PACKARD
PRODUCT MICE
$318.00
$318.00
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
EMP PHYSICAL WERNER
$269.00
$269.00
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
$21.91
SERVICE
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
$65.00
$33.25
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
$148.75
$25.00
$25.00
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
$150.00
COW
MTG
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
$61.01
CHERYL L. PASALIC
MILEAGE REIMB
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
$327.62
$50.53
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
$97.50
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MARCH92 LEGAL SERVICES
EXPENSES
$203.75
$10.80
$1,075.54
EXPENSES
$4.02
54
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEFT.
EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$24. 91.40
60
5106.22*
$24.60
VON BRIESEN AND FURTELL, S.C.
MARCH LEGAL SERVICES
$907.51
$907.51
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$11,529.85
GENERAL FUND
$11,529.85
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
GLORIA BARLETTA
COMM ASST
COW
MTG
$25.00
$25.00
CORTEZ DIXON
COMM ASST
ZNG
BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
EDWARD FRANCE
COMM ASST
ZNG
BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$33.25
$33.25
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
COMM ASST
BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
SUSAN MUELLER
COMM ASST
COW
MTG
$25.00
$25.00
CHERYL L. PASALIC
MILEAGE REIMB
$
$50.53
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$7.53
$7.00
$7.00*
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUCKEYE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$263.05
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$173.25
$436.30
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
$3.32
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$159.09
$159.09
APRIL RAJCZYK
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
JERRY RAJCZYK
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
ROSCOR CORPORATION
BATTERY
$355.20
$355.20
THE TAPE COMPANY
TAPES
$684.30
$1,800.51
GENERAL FUND
TAPES
$325.80
$1,010.10
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
VARIOUS CABLES
$109.83
$109.83
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,740.91
GENERAL FUND
$1,740.91
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUCKEYE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
RIBBONS
$263.05
2 CARTRIDGES
$173.25
$436.30
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$3.32
EXPENSES
$5.25
$8.57*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$159.09
$159.09
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
ENVELOPES
$195.00
$195.00
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
CASH RECEIPT FORMS
$511.60
$511.60
XEROX CORP.
MTCE-1048 COPIER AGREEMENT
$489.95
$489.95
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$1,800.51
GENERAL FUND
$1,800.51
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL PAGE $58.02
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD
FAHEY MEDICAL CENTER, S.C.
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF EMPL SEC.
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
WHEELING TOWNSHIP
Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE
MED CLAIMS THRU 4/23
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 4129
SERVICES VILLARREAL
REIMBURSEMENT
UNEMPLOY BENEFITS BUBLITZ
SERVICES -V LEN
36 CHOLESTEROL TESTS
P1 BODY REPAIRS
$30,755.09
$12,692.66
$50.00
$271.50
$760.00
$65.00
$108.00
$197.60
$43,447.75*
$50.00
$271.50
$760.00
$65.00
$108.00
$197.60
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ***TOTAL** $44,899.85
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4130192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
LEGAL PAGE
$65.93
LEGAL PAGE
$73.85
LEGAL PAGE
$60.66
LEGAL PAGE
$68.57
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
LEGAL PAGE
$71.21
LEGAL PAGE
$71.21
LEGAL PAGE
$52.75
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
LEGAL PAGE
$110.77
$880.89
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$880.89
GENERAL FUND
$880.89
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD
FAHEY MEDICAL CENTER, S.C.
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF EMPL SEC.
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
WHEELING TOWNSHIP
Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE
MED CLAIMS THRU 4/23
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 4129
SERVICES VILLARREAL
REIMBURSEMENT
UNEMPLOY BENEFITS BUBLITZ
SERVICES -V LEN
36 CHOLESTEROL TESTS
P1 BODY REPAIRS
$30,755.09
$12,692.66
$50.00
$271.50
$760.00
$65.00
$108.00
$197.60
$43,447.75*
$50.00
$271.50
$760.00
$65.00
$108.00
$197.60
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ***TOTAL** $44,899.85
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $44,899.85
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
WILLIAM L. AMUNDSEN
REGISTRATION/EXPENSES
156.18
$156.18
B & H INDUSTRIES
CREDIT SEPIA MYLAR
117.20 -
PAPER PLOT PENS
$82.46
$34.74
CHARLES BENCIC
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$79.09
$79.09
BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC.
BOCA CERT. PROGRAM
$35.00
$35.00
ELEK-TEK, INC.
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$229.00
$229.00
ELEK-TEK, INC.
COMPUTER SYSTEM
$351.99
COMPUTER SYSTEM
$2,000.00
SOFTWARE
$102.64
$2,454.63
IAFSM
DUES-WULBECKER
$20.00
$20.00
DAN JAKES
REGISTRATION/EXPENSES
$154.18
$154.18
MICRO INTERNATIONAL
SOFTWARE UPGRADE
$99.00
$99.00
MOTOROLA, INC.
DC REMOTE
$5.00
EQUIPMENT
$970.00
$975.00
NATIONAL SEMINARS GROUP
WORKSHOP-VANDORNICK
$69.00
$69.00
ORDER FROM HORDER
CARD STOCK
$84.46
$84.46
PETTY CASH - FINANCE, DEPT.
EXPENSES
$3.25
EXPENSES
$10.71
EXPENSES
$24.00
EXPENSES
$7.86
EXPENSES
$11.76
$5.24
$62.82*
PROSPECT DIVE SHOP
UKPMINISQ40 LIGHTS
$16.96
UK MINI Q40 LIGHTS
$$62.x7
$ .66
QUALEX, INC.
INSPECTION SUPPLIES
$62.07
$62.70
$62
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS
$1,161.00
INSPECTION
$50.00
INSPECTIONS
$54.00
$1,265.00
TOPCON MIDWEST
SUPPLIES
$192.42
SUPPLIES
$570.00
$762.42
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$170.77
$170.77
GENERAL FUND
$7,287.82
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ABM, INC.
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
LEONARD E. BANAS
MICHAEL BARRETT
MARK BONNER
CALEA
COMP USA
COMPUSERVE, INC
COMPUTERLAND
THOMAS F. DALEY
JAMES EDWARDS
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
GRAPHIC SERVICES
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
TONER
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
$1,995.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
LOCK REPAIR
$4.38
$4.38
PAYMENT DATE 4/30%92
$19.28
$19.28
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
$36.00
24 ACCREDITATION PENS
$390.00
JEFFREY WULBECKER
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$21.44
SUPPLIES
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$13.90
$35.34
XEROX CORP.
MTCE-1048 COPIER AGREEMENT
$489.94
$489.94
INSPECTION SERVICES
2 OKIDATA RIBBONS
***TOTAL**
$7,287.82
GENERAL FUND
$7,287.82
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ABM, INC.
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
LEONARD E. BANAS
MICHAEL BARRETT
MARK BONNER
CALEA
COMP USA
COMPUSERVE, INC
COMPUTERLAND
THOMAS F. DALEY
JAMES EDWARDS
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
GRAPHIC SERVICES
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
TONER
$58.00
FAX MACHINE
$1,995.00
$2,053.00
LOCK REPAIR
$4.38
$4.38
EXPENSES
$19.28
$19.28
EXPENSES
$19.28
$19.28
EXPENSES
$36.00
$36.00
24 ACCREDITATION PENS
$390.00
$390.00
SUPPLIES
$469.95
SUPPLIES
$265.50
SUPPLIES
$162.25
$897.70
COMPUTER SVC INFORMATION
$9.36
$9.36
2 OKIDATA RIBBONS
$16.00
$16.00
AIRLINE TICKET REIMB
$337.00
$337.00
EXPENSES
$30.00
$30.00
MARCH92 CAR WASHES
$508.00
$508.00
MEMO PADS
$92.00
$92.00
FILM PROCESSING
$43.06
$43.06
MTCE%COPIES
$108.56
MTCEZCOPIES
$145.44
MTCE{COPIES
$159.78
$413.78
SERVICE
$147.92
$147.92
REGISTER-RZEPECKI
$75.00
$75.00*
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE ACADEMY
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MOTOROLA, INC.
NATIONWIDE TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
RAY O'HERRON CO., INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
ERIC E. PIEE
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
PROSPECT PET SHOP
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
SAVE -A -PET
SONAR ENTERPRISES
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
WALKER RICHER & QUINN, INC.
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4130/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
TUITION FAVIA/ZIOLKOWSKI
$708.00
$708.00
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$83.85
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$83.95
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$176.45
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$462.00
$806.25
CREDIT
$21.00 -
SUPPLIES
$39.90
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$52.66
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$46.31
SUPPLIES
$23.62
SUPPLIES
$371.61
$513.10
SVCE AGREEMENT BALANCE
$285.00
$285.00
TONER
$205.93
$205.93
PHYSICALS
$2,925.00
PHYSICALS
$170.00
$3,095.00
TUITION-LISCHALK
$55.00
TUITION-KOTLARZ SULLIVANT
$550.00
4 SPANISH COMMUNICATION
$100.00
$705.00
SUPPLIES
$250.04
SUPPLIES
$201.30
$451.34
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
$20.00
RADIO REPAIRS
$1,291.00
$1,291.00
MARCH92 STRAYS
$351.00
$351.00
2 ANIMAL CARRYING CASES
$50.00
$50.00
OFFENSE REPORTS
$369.00
$369.00
MARCH92 STRAYS
$175.00
$175.00
AMMUNITION
$333.00
AMMUNITION
$109.00
$442.00
MAR92 LOCKUP/FOOD
$61.20
$61.20
MICROFILMING
$2,577.83
$2,577.83
SOFTWARE UPGRADE
$125.00
$125.00
1992 IL VEHICLE CODE BOOKS
$525.00
1992 IL VEHICLE CODE BOOKS
$92.50
1992 IL VEHICLE CODE BOOKS
$23.00
$640.50
POLICE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $17,963.91
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4130192
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $17,963.91
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ALEXIS FIRE APPARATUS CO.
ALLIED LABS
AMERICAN SOC. FOR PUBL. ADMIN.
AUBURN AUTO & TRUCK PARTS, INC
AUTO TRUCK CHICAGO
BUSSE HARDWARE
CAREER TRACK PUBLICATIONS,INC.
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CELLULAR PHONE SERVICES
CLARK BOARDMAN CALLAGHAN
ROBERT CLARK
COORDINATED BUSINESS SYS. LTD
TERRENCE CORR
COURTESY HOME CENTER
CPR PUBLISHERS, INC.
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
FULTON CONTRACTING CO.
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
BRIAN IPSEN
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
AIR ACTIVATOR CYL
$13.58
SUPPLIES
$61.68
$75.26
AIR ANALYSIS
$60.00
$60.00
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$55.00
$55.00
2 WHEELS
$40.00
$40.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$1,657.06
$1,657.06
SUPPLIES
$22.38
$22.38
PUBLICATIONS
$154.45
$154.45
SERVICE
$270.92
$270.92
SUPPLIES
$83.00
$83.00
PUBLICATION
$81.00
$81.00
2 ROPE RESCUE BOOKS
$40.00
EXPENSES
$120.00
$160.00
MTCE AGREEMENT
$379.18
$379.18
EXPENSES
$65.00
$65.00
SUPPLIES
$22.01
$22.01
CPR BOOKS
$108.00
$108.00
FAX PAPER
$84.00
$84.00
PARTS
$47.46
$47.46
MARCH92 CAR WASHES
$16.00
$16.00
SEMI-ANNUAL MTCE
$1,954.91
$1,954.91
MTCE/COPIES
$108.55
MTCEICOPIES
$145.44
MTCEfCOPIES
$159.78
$413.77
SERVICE
$192.14
SERVICE
$101.69
SERVICE
$21.77
SERVICE
$21.86
$337.46
36 HAZMAT IST RESPONDER
$648.00
$648.00
TUITION REIMB
$522.00
$522.00
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$37.05
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$37.05
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$32.05
$106.15
KIWANIS CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MEMBERSHIP-CAVELLO
$60.00
$60.00
KNAPP SHOES INC.
SHOES
$116.00
SHOES
$58.00
$174.00
KREST UNIFORMS, INC.
SUPPLIES
$10.00
SUPPLIES
$10.00
SUPPLIES
$65.25
SUPPLIES
$363.50
SUPPLIES
$69.90
$518.65
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
FRT CHGS IMV20540020
$56.89
$56.89
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
DOOR WEATHERSTRIP
$106.50
$106.50
LION PHOTO OF SCHAtTMBURG
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$159.95
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$15.00
$174.95
LIQUID AIR CORPORATION
CYLINDERS
$20.00
$20.00
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$5.44
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$187.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$208.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$197.59
$598.03
MACACADEMY
SOFTWARE
$118.95
$118.95
MARV'S APPLIANCE SERVICE
OVEN PARTS
$149.75
$149.75
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
$731.99
SUPPLIES
$103.51
SUPPLIES
$39.98
BLOOD PRESSURE MONITOR
$162.68
$1,038.16
MEMORY PLUS
COMPUTER MEMORY CHIPS
$563.00
$563.00
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
PLAQUE-KLEIN
$38.82
$38.82
MKM DISTRIBUTORS
JR FIREFIGHTER BADGES
$340.96
$340.96
MURPHY'S CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT
SAW
$815.00
$815.00
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
PARTS$16.10
PARTS
$23.90
PARTS
$169.50
PARTS
$111.69
CREDIT
$123.90 -
PARTS
$73.51
PARTS
$132.84
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS,I
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PROSPECT DIVE SHOP
RADIO SHACK
ROADWAY EXPRESS, INC.
SCHMERLER FORD INC.
SIANA BAKERY
SOUTHERN WISC. & NO. ILL. FIRE
SYMANTEC
THE TAPE COMPANY
DEL ULREICH
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
DONALD WISNIEWSKI
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
$137.03
PARTS
$29.84
CREDIT
$28.50 -
PARTS
$20.00
PARTS
$52.78
$614.79
SEMIMAR CHGS
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
MISC EXPENSES
$31.10
MISC EXPENSES
$6.05
MISC EXPENSES
$8.96
MISC EXPENSES
$13.98
MISC EXPENSES
$11.78
MISC EXPENSES
$10.00
MISC EXPENSES
$17.56
$99.43*
1 SRT MANUAL
$26.00
4 SCUBA TANKS
$500.00
$526.00
SCANNER
$139.95
$139.95
WINCHES & PARTS FREIGHT
$41.69
$41.69
PARTS
$49.30
$49.30
ROLLS FOR HMI CLASS
$106.20
$106.20
DUES-CAVELLO
$15.00
$15.00
SOFTWARE
$47.00
$47.00
TAPES
$244.00
$244.00
EXPENSES
$140.50
$140.50
MICROFILMING
$410.78
$410.78
EXPENSES
$65.00
$65.00
***TOTAL**
$15,636.31
$15,470.36 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND
$165.95
********************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$32.00
PAGE 14
B & H INDUSTRIES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$24.55
$24.55
DAVID M. CLEMENTS
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
$795.00
$795.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
EXPENSES
$60.00
$73.40*
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$1,026.50
$1,026.50
COMMUNITY CAB CO.
152 SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$292.65
$292.65
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$50.80
$50.80*
SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CO.
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
$94.22
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
$7.68
$101.90
SHELTER, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$2,250.00
$2,250.00
THE TAPE COMPANY
TAPES
$61.00
$61.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$3,782.85
GENERAL FUND
$3,782.85
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
SUBSCRIPTION
$32.00
$32.00
B & H INDUSTRIES
DIAZO PAPER
$24.55
$24.55
DAVID M. CLEMENTS
CONF ADVANCE EXPENSES
$795.00
$795.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$13.40
EXPENSES
$60.00
$73.40*
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$924.95
GENERAL FUND
$924.95
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $240.14
PARTS $32.03 $272.17
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$272.00
$272.00
ALEXIAN BROTHERS MEDICAL CENTE
EXERCISE/NUTRITION SPEAKER
$100.00
$100.00
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
GENERAL MICE RESURFACING
$13,492.32
COLD PATCH
$328.10
COLD PATCH
$326.40
$14,146.82
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
SUPPLIES
$130.74
$130.74
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$40.76
SUPPLIES
$66.69
LOCK
$285.72
$393.17
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
GASKETUPPLIES
BERTHOLD NURSERY
TREE
$184.00
$184.00
BILL'S LAWN & POWER
PARTS
$57.42
PARTS
$16.20
PARTS
$36.00
$109.62
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
2 TRANSMITTERS
$144.00
$144.00
BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE
PUBLICATIONS
$75.96
$75.96
BUSSE HARDWARE
CREDIT
$41.40 -
CREDIT
$57.95 -
SUPPLIES
$40.69
SUPPLIES
$40.48
$18.18
JOSE CASTRO
REIMB SHOES/TOOL ALLOW
$50.00
REIMB SHOES TOOL ALLOW
$360.00
$410.00
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
MARCH92 CELLULAR SERVICE
$258.88
$258.88
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$85.43
$85.43
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
SUPPLIES
$20.65
$20.65
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BF80-JT-17006
$110.06
$110.06
CUMMINS NORTHERN ILLINOIS, INC
MTCE SUPPLIES
$21.66
MTCE SUPPLIES
$28.39
MTCE SUPPLIES
$104.86
$154.91
DOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
REPAIRS
$629.86
REPAIRS
$275.27
$905.13
EBERHART STEEL PRODUCTS CORP.
BLACK EDGE LOCK
$433.17
$433.17*
ENGINEMASTERS, INC.
PARTS
$15.94
PARTS
$128.55
$144.49
FINE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$104.04
$104.04
FRIES AUTOMOTIVE SERVICES, INC
TREE REMOVAL
$225.00
$225.00
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
G & K SERVICES
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
JAMES E. GUENTHER
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
DELAINE HAMMON
HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC.
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
ILLINOIS IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC
INDUSTRIAL LADDER & SUPPLY CO.
INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER,
NELS J. JOHNSON
CHARLES KLEHM & SON NURSERY
LAND AND LAKES CO
LYONS EQUIPMENT CO.
JOHN MARK
MCCANN CONSTR. SPECIALTIES CO.
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L
NEON MATERIALS COMPANY
NORTHWESTERN DRAWING
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MARCH92 CAR WASHES
$20.00
$20.00
UNIFORM SERVICES
$180.68
UNIFORM SERVICE
$155.97
$336.65
1 FLOAT VALVE
$11.20
$11.20
TOOLZCLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$360.00
TOOL%CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$200.00
$560.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,514.70
$1,514.70
S/C SIDEWALK REPL
$70.00
$70.00
PAARTS
$72.75
PARTS
$83.76
$156.51
HVAC REPAIR PARTS
$41.50
HUMIDIFIER W/ACCESSORIES
$162.00
$203.50
1 TRENCH SHOVEL
$41.25
200 FLAGS
$14.00
$55.25
1-16' H.D. EXT.LADDER
$187.95
$187.95
METAL
$203.39
$203.39
TREE & DEBRIS REMOVAL
$645.00
TREE TRIMMING
$619.00
TREE TRIMMING
$363.00
TREE REMOVAL
$838.50
$2,465.50
PLANTINGS
$85.00
PLANTINGS
$136.80
$221.80
15 YARDS DEBRIS DUMPED
$132.00
$132.00
PARTS
$1,394.83
$1,394.83*
TOOL ALLOWANCE
$360.00
$360.00
PORTABLE POWER COMPACTOR
$2,860.00
HARDWARE SHOE
$158.00
$3,018.00
GRAVEL
$9.72
$9.72
SUPPLIES
$187.26
MICE SUPPLIES
$252.18
$439.44
PARTS
$45.00
PARTS
$245.07
$290.07
SERVICE FLUE PIPE
$593.14
$593.14
SAFETY FILM
$83.00
$83.00
SUPPLIES
$90.00
$90.00
BEINFANG FOAM BOARD
$27.63
►tLa1 LD e]
STREET DIVISION
NOVAK & PARKER INC.
PETROLANE GAS SERVICE
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
RTF - SUBURBAN
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
GUNNAR SORENSEN
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
STATE TREASURER
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
ANDY TIERNEY
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION, INC
VAN DOORN ROOFING, INC.
WHEELING NURSERIES
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BEINFANG FOAM BOARD
$20.31
$47.94
SERVICE MICROWAVE
$10.00
$10.00
14-100# TANKS PROPANE
$456.96
$456.96
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$6.71
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$44.48
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$23.43
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$30.24
$104.86*
QTRLY MTCE CHGS
$600.00
QTRLY MTCE CHGS
$167.25
$767.25
SMALL TOOLS
$85.02
SMALL TOOLS
$15.54
SMALL TOOLS
$30.96
$131.52
S%C SIDEWALK PROGRAM
$140.00
$140.00
PiLUMBING SUPPLIES
$39.15
$39.15
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
130.73
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
242.96
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$381.18
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$529.11
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$265.29
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$475.92
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$362.98
$2,388.17
SUPPLIES
$24.00
$24.00
TOOL ALLOWANCE
$360.00
$360.00
1991 RESURFACING
$2,602.00
1991 RESURFACING
$9,733.24
1991 RESURFACING
$12,946.96
$25,284.20
CAULKED HVAC UNIT
$63.62
$63.62
2 FLOWERING ALMONDS
$49.98
$49.98
***TOTAL**
$60,947.10
$42,632.42 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$1,190.85
$17,123.83
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$127.48
PARTS
$56.73
PARTS
$183.41
PARTS
$72.39
$440.01
AM-LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$358.99
$358.99
M. LISA ANGELL
REIMB CDL$40.00
$40.00
B & H INDUSTRIES
VELLUM COPIES/DIAZO PRINTS
$55.55
$65.55
BADGER METER INC
METERS
$8,167.20
$8,167.20
DAVID BOESCHE
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
SUPPLIES
$35.26
$35.26
BUSSE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
$47.76
$47.76
KAREN CEISEL
CPR INSTRUCTION PW
$120.00
$120.00
PRO CLEAN, INC.
CENTURY LABS/PRO
BROOMS
$255.98
$255.98
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BJ80-JT-23598
$5,169.07
$5,169.07
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH67-JT-1310-A
$58.56
$58.56
E & H UTILITY SALES
3 CUT-IN VALVES
$1,395.75
$1,395.75
BARRY EISEN
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
TOOL ALLOWANCE
$360.00
$410.00
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
DELIVERY
$23.50
PRIORITY LETTER
$15.50
$39.00
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
MARCH92 CAR WASHES
$18.00
$18.00
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICES
$180.67
UNIFORM SERVICE
$155.97
$336.64
GATEWAY SUPPLY CO.
SUPPLIES
54.75
$54.75
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$41.49
TIRES
$990.34
$1,331.83
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
1 350 CFM BLOWER-AOL
$78.87
1 FLASHLIGHT
$21.95
$100.82
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
SUPPLIES
$830.25
SUPPLIES
$88.84
SUPPLIES
$166.60
SUPPLIES
$168.30
SUPPLIES
$15.30
$1,269.29
GREELEY AND HANSEN
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$5,850.85
$5,850.85
H-B-K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
$428.22
WATER METER LABOR
$856.44
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30%92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER METER LABOR
$356.85
WATER METER LABOR
$570.96
WATER METER LABOR
$214.11
WATER METER LABOR
$142.74
WATER METER LABOR
$356.85
$2,926.17
HARCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
ANNUAL SERVICE
$375.00
ANNUAL SERVICE
$1,275.00
$1,650.00
I.B.M. CORPORATION
SERVICE TO PROPRINTER II
$44.41
$44.41
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$18.19
SERVICE
$19.26
SERVICE
$24.34
SERVICE
$18.29
$141.34
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT
CYLINDER
$153.25
$153.25
ILLINOIS RANGE COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$189.00
$189.00
DANIEL JONES
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$44.28
$44.28
JULIE, INC.
MARCH92 SERVICES
$42.72
MARCH92 SERVICES
$86.35
MARCH92 SERVICES
$3.88
$132.95
KACKERT ENTERPRISES INC.
PARTS
$501.00
$501.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$54.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$210.00
$264.00
LEE JENSEN SALES CO., INC.
NYLON STRAPS
$47.60
SUPPLIES
$326.74
$374.34
MATERIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
SUPPLIES
$500.18
FREIGHT CHGS#12484B
$111.10
$611.28
ROGER MEYER
MATERIAL/HAULING
$1,728.55
MATERIALJHAULING
$2,087.47
$3,816.02
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
PARTS
$57.25
PARTS
$88.50
PARTS
$55.00
$200.75
EDWARD NASTEK
PHOTOS
$318.85
$318.85
NET MIDWEST, INC.
MAR92 WATER SAMPLES
$112.50
$112.50
NET MIDWEST, INC.
LEAD SAMPLING
$20.00
$20.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1818 1%2 BONITA
$114.69
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETROLANE GAS SERVICE
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PROSAFETY
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
RED WING SHOE STORE
DAVID RISTOW
ROMA PLUMBING CORP.
JAMES RORAY
ROSEMONT GARDENS INC.
JOHN ROSSBACH
ROSETTI BROTHERS CONSTR.CO.INC
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
117 N WAVERLY
NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND
112 E HIGHLAND/EMMERSON
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
MTCE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
2 TOOL BUCKETS
2 TOOL BUCKETS
FILM SUPPLIES
FILM & PROCESSING
FILM & PROCESSING
FILM & PROCESSING
FILM & PROCESSING
SAFETY SHOES-POHLMANN
SAFETY SHOES-DOOLITTLE
TOOL ALLOWANCE
BACKFLOW PREVENTOR TESTING
TOOL ALLOWANCE
SOD
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
SEWER REPAIRS
FILTER SCREENS
1992 OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
DOOR HANGER BAGS
1992 OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
1992 OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
1992 OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$79.36
$67.49
$153.83
$68.57
$87.03
$20.00
$20.00
$29.01
$7.30
$170.63
$10.00
$7.50
$7.78
$10.33
$81.57
$69.79
$41.21
$31.20
$38.76
$126.00
$34.50
$30.87
$50.00
J50.00
$ 60.00
$450.00
$360.00
$18.90
$48.38
$18,987.68
$1,570.26
$66.28
$1,272.79
$36.97
$390.28
$496.18
PAGE 20
TOTAL
$415.37
$224.61
$7.30
$287.81*
$111.00
$261.33
$100.00
$360.00
$450.00
$360.00
$18.90
$48.38
$18,987.68
$1,570.26
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
SOLVENT SYSTEMS INT'L. INC.
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
JOSEPH SZAFRAN
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
WEAVER MAILING SERVICES, INC.
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
RECYCLE OIL FILTERS
SUPPLIES
TOOL ALLOWANCE
BATTERY
EQUIPMENT
WORK ORDERS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
MTCE SUPPLIES
MICE SUPPLIES
PARTS
$67,665.94
INVOICE AMOUNT
$62.55
$510.29
$304.05
$233.67
$1.78
$200.00
$68.75
$360.00
$93.50
$885.00
$179.86
$51.50
$4.56
$1,266.94
$4.08
$667.80
$60.82
$130.20
***TOTAL**
PAGE 21
TOTAL
$3,139.39
$235.45
$200.00
$68.75
$360.00
$978.50
$179.86
$1,327.08
$858.82
$67,665.94
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A
$22.30
BH66-JT-3710-A
$12.07
BH66-JT-5262-A
$166.60
BH66-JT-5266-C
$153.67
BH68-JT-7498-A
DES PLAINES GLASS COMPANY GLASS & GLAZING
$22.30 $376.94
$325.00 $325.00
SHEPP PEST CONTROL APRIL92 PEST CONTROL
$240.00 $240.00
VENDOR
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/30/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$941.94
INVOICE AMOUNT
***TOTAL**
PAGE 22
TOTAL
$941.94
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
MIDWEST DECAL RECYCLING DECALS $725.50
YARD MATERIAL DECALS $221.55 $947.05
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $947.05
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $947.05
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ADAMS INTERIORS LTD.
VERTICAL BLINDS
$2,750.00
$2,750.00*
AUTOMATIC APPLIANCE PARTS CORP
1 THERMOCOUPLING
$54.52
$54.52
BUSSE HARDWARE
CREDIT
$27.62 -
CREDIT
$18.98 -
SUPPLIES
$48.71
$2.11
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH66-JT-5388-C
$279.22
$279.22
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$39,317.87
$39,317.87
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
THERMOSTAT
$35.00
$35.00
HENRY NEWGARD & COMPANY
ELECTRICAL WORK
$7,092.86
$7,092.86
NORTHERN PAINTING & DECOR. INC
PAINT 1601 GOLF FIRE HOUSE
$7,500.00
$7,500.00
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
SERVICES RENDERED
$70,836.58
$70,836.58
ALBERT W. RUFF
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
$700.00
$700.00
SZABO CONTRACTING
STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
$117,648.23
$117,648.23
TAFCO CORPORATION
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
BANNERS
FLAG POLES
FLAG POLES
BUS SHELTER PARTS
$3,970.52
$870.00
$1,500.00
$138.00 $3,258.00
$604.94 $604.94
***TOTAL** $3,970.52
$1,142,566.02
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 23
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4%30/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
TECH SYN CORPORATION
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
SUPPLIES
MAR92 LOCKUP/FOOD
$1,487.96
$1,487.96
$50.00
$50.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$247,754.35
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$1,487.96 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
$17,711.60
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$39,369.98 FLOOD CONTROL CONST
FUND 1991
$189,184.81
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BG21-JT-1838-A
$56.98
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
BH67-JT-3858-B
BANNERS
$50.60
$750 00
$107.58
TAFCO CORPORATION
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
BANNERS
FLAG POLES
FLAG POLES
BUS SHELTER PARTS
$3,970.52
$870.00
$1,500.00
$138.00 $3,258.00
$604.94 $604.94
***TOTAL** $3,970.52
$1,142,566.02
DATE RUN 4/30/92
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24
TIME RUN 11.08.14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 4/30/92
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$505,125.61
21
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$29,002.48
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$17.,123.83
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$1,682.55
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,026.65
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$122,206.48
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,972.54
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$1,487.96
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$66,327.90
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$19,068.40
53
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$39,369.98
58
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
$189,184.81
64
POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & I 1991A
$10.00
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$42,971.80
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$48,698.38
73
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$418.67
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$46,887.98
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,142,566.02
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: APRIL, 28, 1992
SUBJECT: CHANGE IN STOCK OWNERSHIP FOR HOLIDAY INN
LIQUOR LICENSE
Since the new owners have been in operation at the Holiday Inn, they have been
operating the beverage and liquor section through Ampak Beverage Corporation.
Mr. Sindhu, who is coordinating the modeling efforts at the Holiday Inn has been and
will continue to be a 49% ownership partner with Ampak Beverage. They are bringing
in a new liquor manager, Mr. Bokhari, and he will be receiving 51% ownership of the
Ampak Beverage Corporation.
Because of the change in the major shareholder of the Corporation, this information is
before you. Mr. Bokhari has been fingerprinted by the Police Department and has had
some past experience as Food and Beverage Manager at this same Holiday Inn in 1988
and then went on to a Hampton Inn in Schiffer Park before coming back to this facility
at the request of Mr. Sindhu.
Mr. Bokhari has not had a Liquor License in his name in the past although he had been
involved with purchasing of liquor for motel operations in the past. He has not
personally been involved with a sale at a bar or any restaurant setting. He just oversaw
those operations.
They will change ownership effective June 30, 1992.
��ON
JOHN FIJ�L�,TODI
JFD/rcc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRQSPECT
COOK COLM. UMO
LOCAL LIQUOR CQNTROL COMMISSION
APPLICAMN FOR RETAIL LIQUOR DEALER'S LICENSE
RENEWAL DATE�,(-'// __�3
NEW 150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of new
Liquor License; one-time only fee)
Honorable Gerald L Farley, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as
Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of
January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount
Prospect, County of Cook State of Illinois:
The undersigned, Am Po, K Ge u erra. , C or
hereby makes application for a Classlizor dealer's license for the period ending
April 30, 1%, and tenders the sum_10�nl x�6t� the prescribed fee as set
forth in the ollowing:
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106):
Annual Fee
CLASS A-- Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00
CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00
CLASS C: Retail package only 2,000.00
CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00
CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000.00
CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine;
limited number of special events to include
full service bar facilities; consumption on
premises only 00.00
CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00
CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00
CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non -
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises 1,750.00
CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,000.00
CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge 2,500.00
CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00
CLASS V: Retail package - wine only 1,500.00
CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only
and at dining tables only 1,500.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL
Your petitioner, AMEAY, lge,�ERA<9-E CJW, doing business as
L Ur� F respectfully requests
j t
permission to operate a retail liquor business at N4,tU : tO E
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Description and name of premises: H o tie L- M OIJ
(Description must be complete as to floor area, frontage, etc.)
Is applicant owner of premises: N 0
If not owner,' does applicant have a lease?\),# s State date applicant's lease expires:
12 is 1,ib — If not owner, attach copy-757—lease, hereto.
Does applicant have a management contract with another person or entity for the
operation or management of the licensed premises?
If so, state the name and address of the manager or management company.
tl\�
, . kine manager or management company must
the same application as the owner).
Is applicant an individual, a corporation, a co -partnership or an association? (Circle one)
If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number:
-,-- A
If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof.
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
.11,11111, N /A
If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation:
12- 1 -)/ /f7/ / L- z._..
Ifa corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date
qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois:
If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social
Security Numbers of Officers and Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of
birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than
5% of the stock of such corporation. C;:yP. c.ka-nje Cj'LL
OFFICE AND/OR '"c4- - -N
PERCENT OF PLX'C' +�L-
AMR= STOCK HELD b-Ic
Ho 41 MY C— 461,v be s- I
Dc—% PL A 7Z Il. 6cc I& So 1JD1+13
Date of Birth: q1 / 315 7 Social Security # 3 38- So - 5 7go 2- Phone # 7og-29&- 7353
Sk-AU16+T 0-4. S-O'hit) Lzcc E. �� IL
Date of Birth: q - s c, Social Security # 3 ) z_ 7 7e
,2. 3ggc Phone # s- s- 9
Date of Birth: social Security # Phone #
(Additional information to be included on aseparate listing.)
Objects for which organization is formed: _� �`r �, k 414 n,,,yCly h Lftu Je , A V r
Mto +tt
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or
any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been
convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? A/ If so, explain:
if applicant is an individual, state age: A - Marital status:
Is applicant a citizen of the United States? If a naturalized, citizen, state date and
place of naturalization:
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to
the filing of this application?
Local address: 1q, t QRwm+- & Telephone no. -7,,q- g,I$ - o 7 i?(,
(L 6-0 94
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore:
State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time:
�2�60
How long has applicant been in this business? 3 Y6 A a, s _
Is the applicant an elected public official? 4 0 ff so, state the particulars thereof:
Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public
official?
In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any
political contributions within the past 2 years? p
If so, state the particulars thereof:
Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? If so, designate title:
Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp?
A.4— H so, state the reasons therefor.
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of
subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of
the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? AJ0 ff so, list
date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premises
other than described in this application? AJ 0_ ff so, state disposition of such
application:
Is applicant qualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor
business? N 1~ Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal
government or by any state or subdivision thereof? Q If so, explain:
Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed
by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? _QQ_
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United
States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the
conduct of hK/her place of business?
Does applicant currently carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? YE -5. If "Yes," attach
0
copy. ON 0*" Age CI- pl,,Aa.
If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop
Insurance coverage? (If the answer to either of the foregoing questions is "No,"
no license shall issue j—
Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the time of
Wig?
State name and address of each surety next below:
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of
manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application is made:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT,,I.
Corporate Seal
(If applicant is corporation)
Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that he is/are the
applicant(s) for the license requested in the foregoing application; that fie is/are of
good repute, character and standing and that answers to the questiorg-asked in the
foregoing application are true and correct in every detail.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Ss.
COUNTY OF COOK
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this day of 4a4h,'# AD., lqj�g.
'NOTARY
OFFICIAL L S0A FL "
JUDY
UD Y ST EIN HR
PU8LjC. STATE OF ILLINOIS LL ITN 0I S
frubtlel')41UN txF1Ht5 v4u/v,�
Nolar�����
?"Joul Ux*0h*-t
APPLICATION APPROVED;
L,ocal Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 29, 1992
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR NEW CLASS R LIQUOR LICENSE
CHUNGKIWA RESTAURANT, 1631-33 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
I met with Ms. Yi and Ms. Chong who will be the owners of the new restaurant. Both
of them have had experience as waitresses in Korean restaurants in the past and both
of them have, in fact, worked at Shin Jung which is on Golf Road in Mount Prospect.
They wish to open up a Korean barbecue restaurant where there will be seating for
approximately 42 people and will have the cooking by barbecue at each of the tables.
They anticipate being open from 10:30 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. each night. Ms. Yi has four
years' experience and Ms. Chong has eight years of experience and they anticipate
opening at the end of May or early June. Both of them have worked short periods of
time behind a bar but have never had a Liquor License in their name before. I
encouraged both of them to attend a mixology school which they have already indicated
they were looking into and they anticipate having that completed prior to their opening.
They are in the process of being fingerprinted and going through all of the State
requirements before opening. The establishment will be primarily a restaurant with
liquor to be incidental service.
They will be present Tuesday evening to answer any questions the Board may have. A
sample menu is attached for your information.
lyU!'�f
JFD/rcc
attachment
INSPECTION SERVICES
''JITIAL
CHUNGKIWA Restaurant
POK-m2mc.
MlF-ATev, ( TL3.�Co
*P-mL6u—'—'Ij (gw)
P ->l (FIC7.2)
Soo HLAL-a&) (far-)
PORK
CH I ek&�
LP%mt ,
Beer- r-lptqf-*f
-%NAt4c-
rl*s 1
L
Sa 4orf-
5t-ti21MP —) (A VA
S Leri -Q^1
SAL
c
7b IN
vnkJ -TtItq
MlF-ATev, ( TL3.�Co
*P-mL6u—'—'Ij (gw)
P ->l (FIC7.2)
Soo HLAL-a&) (far-)
PORK
CH I ek&�
LP%mt ,
Beer- r-lptqf-*f
-%NAt4c-
rl*s 1
( USO K S Ec t F}t T I G-
r
C"op
r)gDNS t36��c1M
5UM gat �,uM
SHZI MP ;, Oc v1
ctiop CtfpE
( ]Awt)LC-C. / k i
Sr.') TLA
'ON ►.tT s
F31 t3lM 13�
KIt=D R
OPT FbT cRs6ek)' L -E-
m : m l
(► OQ ?bN {bop
19 PPT
Cu41•A pt -r
sem► Tbob S-a.tp
-rte cAssIEk Ul�-
KI cftR--- cpSseer".E
VILLAGE OE MQUNT PPQSPECT
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
LOCAL 11QUOR COMQL COMMSSION
APPLICABON FOR REIAIL LIOUQR DEALER'S LICENSE
RENEWAL DATE
NEW � �($150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of new
Liquor License; one-time only fee)
Honorable Gerald L. Farley, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as
Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of
January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village ofount
Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois: C_ It4 v)%* Y'% VON V57M"w T
The undersigned, 9 YON C11,9N61 C trout I %p%,) 1z:A,\k
hereby makes application for a Class V_ liquor dealer's license for the period ending
April 30, 19L3_, and tenders the sumo 3_-Z,or>0,0<n the prescribed fee as set
forth in the following:
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106):
Annual Fee
CLASS A:
Retail package and consumption on premises
$ 2,500.00
CLASS B:
Consumption on premises only
2,000.00
CLASS C:
Retail package only
2,000.00
CLASS D:
Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only
750.00
CLASS E:
Caterer's license
2,000.60
CLASS G:
Park District Golf Course; beer and wine;
limited number of special events to include
fail service bar facilities; consumption on
premises only
00.00
CLASS H:
Supper Club; offering live entertainment
2,000.00
CLASS M:
Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises
2,500.00
CLASS P:
Retail package - refrigerated and non -
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises,___,
1,750.00
'S
S R-
Restaurant -consumption at dining tables only
2,000.00
�CIA
S.
CLAS S:
Restaurant with a lounge
2,'500.00
CLASS T:
Bowling Alley
2,500.00
CLASS V:
Retail package - wine only
1,500.00
CLASS W:
Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only
and at dining tables only
1,500.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED
1,000.00
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL
Yourpetitioner, 9 K) /V 2yQ1.16 doing business as
respectfully requests
permission to operate a retail liquor business at &31. p9U5,SW_
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Description and name of premises: Fiks,7- 44061f.4 -=- -OIVZ- ( PZ -AZA
(AIDT b 5 tto f& & Cc--P-a ic ) A PpRo x 12 1� ! 0 1 1 F�!fig
(Description must be complete as to floor area, frontage, etc.)
Is applicant owner of premises:
If not owner, '
does applicant have a lease? Y6,5 State date applicant's lease expires:
/,g
9� If not owner, attach copy of lease hereto.
Does applicant have a management contract with another person or entity for the
operation or management of the licensed premises? NO
If so, state the name and address of the manager or management company. Md
. (The manager or management company must complete
the same application as the owner).
Is applicant an individual, a corporatio a co -partnership or an association? (Circle one)
If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number:
If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof -
VA
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
H a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: -)Aqj1r g4 /314/9�Z
57-A-1-6 OF --sG/,4JO/S
If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date
qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois:
/VM
If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social
Security Numbers of Officers and Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of
birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than
5% of the stock of such comoration.
OFFICE AND/OR
PERCENT OF
NAME ADDRESS K HELD
V
9,r vla-,oe Ar(.:M 7
0
C#,q/V�r 64!5v vle*u 6 0 0.2,5' -52�20
Date of Birth: %' Social Security # 3 71 �e5 ('�74 6 -)
=_4 c 9 Phone #_jg��d
-,)7z,W <-1(3-C)
'9/vn/ -7Z-
Y/ 6eel&
Date of Birth -./--7 -4 - 6Z Social Security #3A -% 6 0 ZgPhone#J�rq
4&
Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone #
(Additional informal io be included nn n zenarAte hoina-1
Objects for which organization is formed:T0 6&M7 r- A
L, , RE51
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or
any of the partners, incorporators, directors, o cers, agents or stockholders ever been
convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? If so, explain:
If applicant is an individual, state age: N It Marital status:
Is applicant a citizen of the United States? If a naturalized, citizen, state date and
place of naturalization:
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next rior to
the filing of this application? . J R ,�
Local address:
Telephone no.
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: & —577-111kAO
State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time: AO -NE
How long has applicant been in this business??/10N,E - -J-U57- .5 Dq C j /, J6
Is the applicant an elected public official? N/6) If so, state the particulars thereof:
Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public
official?
In the case of an application for the renewal of a iice��� the applicant made any
political contributions within the past 2 years?
If so, state the particulars thereof:_
Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? _i U so, designate title:
Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp?
If so, state the reasons thea efm
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of
subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by on 28-3 of
the "Criminal Code of 1%1" as heretofore or her ended? C If so, list
date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever made similar application for ,�}similar or other license on premises
other than descrir�
bed this application? >v If so, state disposition of such
application:_
Is applicant qualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor
business? YE5 Has applicant ever bad a previous license revoked by the F deral
government or by any state or subdivision thereof? AV if so, explain: // TA--
Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed
by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? NO
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of IDinois, the United
States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the
conduct of his/her place of business? Ye 5
Does applicant currently carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? If "Yes," attach
copy.
If applicant is not the o er of the premises, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop
Insurance coverage? (If the answer to either of the foregoing questions is "No,"
no license shall issue,
Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the time of
filing? . ....... ye -5
State name and address of each surety next below:
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of
manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application is made:
Yl 9a-1 v *X/Vz-/-0,U Ce)V2r Pie. ( 3 z
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
Corporate Seal
(If applicant is corporation)
Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that he is/are the
applicant(s) for the license requested in the foregoing application; that he is/are of
good repute, character and standing and that answers to the questioti-asked in the
foregoing application are true and correct in every detail.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
) SS.
COUNTY OF COOK
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this /,3"'Pday of AD., 19
Notary Public
"01iMALSF,,AL
ly."Ar
My C)lan'L5aC.;
APPLICATION APPROVED;
5a
Liquor Control Commissioner
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, V�E MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS. IRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 29, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-17-V-92, BURTON V. DUBOE
LOCATION: 1500-1522 NORTH ELMHURST ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by Burton V. DuBoe. The applicant is requesting a variation
to Section 14.3012 to allow a reduction in the required parking spaces from 116 to 70 to
allow a Class III restaurant to occupy the building.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of April 23, 1992.
At the meeting, Burton DuBoe, explained the variation was necessary to allow a Lou
Malnati Pizza take-out and delivery restaurant to occupy a space in the Center. He
indicated that this space is available because of the reduction in space by a Chinese
restaurant which is currently a tenant in the Center. He also indicated that several traffic
counts were taken during various times of the day and sufficient parking appears available
to justify the variation.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that if this Center was over 30,00 square feet, the parking
requirement would be 77. However, with a smaller Center, such as this, the parking rate
is calculated for each individual user. Including the proposed restaurant, 116 spaces are
required for this property. He also indicated that there is a variety of users in the Center
and many close between 5:00 and 7:00 p.m. The restaurant would generally cater to evening
and weekend patrons and staff felt that there would be adequate parking available.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board
recommends approval of the variance request.
ir7
! t€
u #.
ONE ST00Y MA�otR1LZY P LDING, mlu
o (((
Aft
FINISH FLCXX{ ELEVA'rtoN +G9•'L+
P , N
A
`I7' c; Gi f 1gyp•'
izi
Ak
lt+t}[}fE�r
14
%it a v
At
Dmp_ trt1Tr
o
NGRolF
�'1+.+aEt✓ REMoyE Fu4+b +� •' d' ' � -._ �•g, �.t �''_ _� a + :: Q
t1. 1 wr>
+VV 0
./Sop V .' D' i2° sgivsr --' L`t-cc.T. M.Ft." uu{. >p = }if bt
rfo
_
AIC
' ; � 4 ELvh'fNj�RsT�Ro{}+a. ,,,• �+G a^ ��, �.^ ��. %�� � � � �F
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT! ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 17-V-92 Hearing Date: April 23, 1992
PETITIONER: Burton V. DuBoe
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1500-1522 North Elmhurst Road
PUBLICATION DATE: April 7, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section
14.3012 of the Village of Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduction in the
required parking spaces from 116 to 70 to allow
a Class III restaurant to occupy the building.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this agenda item as being a request for variation to allow the
reduction of required parking spaces for a shopping center from 116 spaces to 70, to allow
a Class III restaurant to occupy the shopping center.
Mr. Burton DuBoe introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he is one of the
owners of the property at 1500 North Elmhurst Road, and that he is currently working on
a lease for 1,000 square feet of vacant space for a Lou MaInati's Carry Out and Delivery
Pizza business. Mr. DuBoe explained that this vacant space was formerly occupied by the
Chinese restaurant who had reduced their total area, and demonstrated that this space had
been used by a restaurant previously.
Mr. DuBoe explained that, while the Class III restaurant has a higher parking requirement
than the former sit-down Chinese restaurant, he believed that the nature of the carry -out
business would create less of a parking demand at the shopping center. Mr. DuBoe
explained that he had undertaken seven parking space inventories at the shopping center
and that these parking counts indicated that the maximum number of cars at the property
was 46. He explained that the total capacity of the lot is 70 and with this maximum count
of 46, helped indicate that there was a sufficient surplus of parking available to
accommodate the carry -out restaurant.
ZBA-17-V-92
April 23, 1992
Page 2
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe described the parking requirements for a carry -out restaurant and stated that this
is at a rate of 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Mr. Forsythe stated that the Zoning
Ordinance for a small shopping center such as this requires that parking be calculated as
a total requirement for all the individual uses. Mr. Forsythe then explained that, including
the carry -out pizza business, the total required spaces for the shopping center was 116, and
that there are 70 spaces available. Mr. Forsythe explained that there are a number of
restaurants and service and retailuses in the center and each with varying hours of
operation. He believed that many of the uses closed between 5:00 and 7:00 p.m. and that
there is a sufficient amount of parking available in the evening hours which would be the
high demand time for the carry -out pizza business. He stated that staff believes that due
to the current mix of uses in the center, there is adequate parking available at peak times
to accommodate the proposed use.
Chairman Basnik asked if there was any person in the audience to speak in reference to this
request. There was no one to speak in favor or in opposition to the variation.
Mr. Ron Cassidy asked if there would be any seating in the restaurant and Mr. DuBoe
emphasized that this would be take-out and delivery pizza only. He stated that there was
such a small space, there would be.no potential for seating. Mr. Cassidy had stated that he
has observed that the parking lot can be congested, particularly in the summer, during the
evening hours with Baskin and Robbins, but he could support the request if there was no
seating in the restaurant.
Mr. Mark Malnati introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and described his
operation and the number of units that the company currently has. He explained that this
facility would be carry -out only and that there would usually be three cars for delivery, but
the delivery operation would be from the back of the store and the delivery cars would be
parked behind the building.
Mrs. Skowron questioned Mr. DuBoe on the days of the week and the timesof day for the
seven parking counts. Mr. DuBoe explained that he had done his parking counts on
Saturday afternoons and Friday evenings, Thursday afternoons and a Monday morning; and
that from his experience, these would be peak times for the center. He again indicated that
46 spaces was the most cars ever at the property. Mr. DuBoe stated that he believed prime
time for parking demand at this center is really lunch time considering the number of
restaurants, and that in the evening hours some of the users are closed, which allows more
parking availability for those restaurants that maintain evening hours.
Mr. Saviano asked if the Magic Dragon provided a carry -out restaurant and Mr. DuBoe
stated that it did
Mrs. Skowron questioned the hours of the pizza operation and Mr. DuBoe and Mr. Malnati
stated that the hours would be from 4:00 to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Thursday, and 11:00
to 11:00 Friday through Sunday.
ZBA-17-V-92
April 23, 1992
Page 3
Chairman Basnik asked if there was any additional space vacant in the shopping center and
Mr. DuBoe stated there is presently 1,000 square feet vacant and another lease that is due
to expire soon.
Mr. Basnik then asked Mr. Forsythe for the definition of a Class III restaurant and Mr.
Forsythe responded by reading the definition from the Zoning Ordinance.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and there was consensus that
the proposed carry -out restaurant would not contribute to a parking problem at this property
during peak demand times. This consensus was based on the parking counts provided by
the petitioner that demonstrated, that in several instances there were no more than 46
spaces occupied out of the 70 in the center; and that this type of space availability could
easily absorb the type of operation and parking that a carry -out restaurant would require.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for motion on the request. Mr.
Saviano moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of the variation to
reduce the required number of parking spaces at 1500 North Elmhurst Road from 116 to
70 to allow a Class III Restaurant. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully Submitted,
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 14, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-17-V-92
APPLICANT: BURTON V. DUBOE
ADDRESS: 1500-1522 NORTH ELMHURST ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
IWITWL U,
911
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R.:
B-3 Business Retail & Service
60,885 sq. ft.
93.06%
.26
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a variation to Section 14.3012 of the Village of Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance to allow a reduction in the required parking spaces from 116 to 70 to
allow a Class III restaurant to occupy the building.
Summary of application: The petitioners are seeking the variations to allow a Lou Malnati
Carry -out Pizza to occupy the vacant 1,200 square foot space in the Center located at the
southwest intersection of Elmhurst and Camp McDonald Roads. The variation is needed
because of the amount of parking available at the site does not meet the requirements of
a shopping center with a total of three restaurants. The applicant has indicated that
presently there is no parking problem at the Center.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The subject property was included in the Consent
Decree for the Old Orchard Country Club. The three remaining intersections of Elmhurst
and Camp McDonald Roads are also commercially zoned areas in the Village of Prospect
I-1-`ehts. To the west of the subject site is the Country Club and to the south is a Mount
Prospect water tower. Staff would like to note that because the Center is under 30,000
square feet, each commercial use must be analyzed to determine the number of parking
spaces required, while a larger center is calculated at 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet. If
this formula was used for this 17,100 square foot Center, a total number of spaces needed
would be 77.
There are currently a variety of restaurants, services and retail uses in the Center, each
with varying hours of operation. The hours range from 24 hours for the 7-11 Store to 9:00 -
11:00 a.m. Tuesday and Friday or by reservation for the "Fun Station." Many of the uses
close between 5:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. Monday through Friday and 5:00 p.m. on Saturday,
with the exception of the other restaurants which generally cater to their patrons in the
evening hours. Staff believes that due to the current mix of users in this Center, there
should be adequate parking available for the peak time of the carry -out pizza which would
generally be during the evening hours and weekends.
1:1311141"31, ^ a'
There were no objections or concerns raised by other departments.
Staff has no objection to the proposed variation, however, would suggest to the petitioner
that the he be prepared to discuss the proposed hours of the carry -out restaurant as well as
the maximum number of employees on the largest shift. Staff also asked the petitioner to
conduct a parking survey at peak demand times to demonstrate that there are sufficient
vacant spaces for existing users to justify the variation. Also, because there is no street
parking available or any off-site parking nearby, staff would encourage the petitioner to be
careful in the future as to the type of tenant any fixture space is marketed to. Any user who
requires a large amount of traffic could cause a problem with this Center.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 29, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-V-92, ZBA-20-SU-92, JAMES MALAPANES
LOCATION: 1230 SOUTH PRAIRIE AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance and Special Use Permit application filed by James Malapanes. The applicant is
seeking a variation of Section 14.115.0 to allow driveways 31 feet wide and a Special Use
Permit under Section 14.1101.C.8 to allow three -car garages on two lots.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of April 23, 1992.
At the meeting James Malapanes, Jr., representing the petitioner, indicated that they
purchased a large lot and are in the process of subdividing it into two lots. He indicated
that his parents would be building one house and they were building the other house for
sale. They would like to be able to offer three -car garages and the subsequent larger
driveways. He noted that the site plan was a potential scenario and they would be
constructing smaller homes.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, indicated that this area of Mount Prospect is undergoing a change
from "R -X" to "R-1" zoning and many new homes have been built. He also noted that three -
car garages are a common request in new construction especially in expensive custom
homes. The garages are proposed to face the interior of the lot to reduce the impact of the
doors.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning
Board recommends approval of the variation and Special Use Permit, with the following
conditions:
- The driveways be 21 feet at the property line; and
- The garages face the interior of the lots as indicated on the site plan.
NEW
!cam
=1�
WEST UNE OF THE E. 1/2 O� THE. W. I/7 OF -HE N.E.I/4 OF THE S.E. 1/4
,,,WI
F THF N,W, 1/4 OF SFCTI ON I0, TWP, 41 NORTH, RANGE II EAST
151.00
75.50 75.50
IO FT. UTILITY EASEMENT. ---
.».._ -.,, ....x51.00-....
IIII
0
,', oEo1CATEn •
EAST LNE OFTWW.lf$ Ur TWMJE.1/4 T1 �i'•T4 KW. 1/4 ' (NO' LELJ�A-EO
IF SEC 0,
to. TWP. 41 � Kom n usr
e .
w
L
4m
00
'y�M✓'
T Q
Q bpp2 �1
...
m
rb-pm1x'a
PIS
m•ryN8
,.. ,wow,
m
v yySaw
C m
b n2
z-4nrn
,'o$
i
zzmun,
m
n6 X
N
1'l O y T
rnS�
..., '�
tz
1
T"'i bF
low, owl
—4
W =
.».._ -.,, ....x51.00-....
IIII
0
,', oEo1CATEn •
EAST LNE OFTWW.lf$ Ur TWMJE.1/4 T1 �i'•T4 KW. 1/4 ' (NO' LELJ�A-EO
IF SEC 0,
to. TWP. 41 � Kom n usr
e .
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 19-V-92
20 -SU -92
1UNIVIC4100M
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Hearing Date: April 23, 1992
James W. Malapanes
1230 South Prairie Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: April 7, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a variation to
Section 14.115.0 of the Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to allow a driveway 31 feet wide
instead of the maximum allowed 21 feet. Also,
the petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit
under Section 14.1101.C.8 to allow a garage
designed to house more than 2 vehicles. The
request is for two proposed homes that are to
be built on the subject property, after
subdivision.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced the next agenda item as being a request for a variation to allow
a 31 foot driveway instead of a maximum of 21 feet, and a special use permit to allow a
garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles.
Mr. James Malapanes introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he and his
father had recently purchased this property and it was their intent to subdivide the parcel
to two lots and build two large semi -custom made homes. He explained that with upper
bracket homes, as proposed, there was a demand for three -car garages and the special use
request was filed to allow the construction of the three -car garages with these two homes.
Mr. Malapanes noted that the 31 foot driveway width is necessary to provide access to the
proposed garages.
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe noted that this request for a subdivision is currently being processed by the Plan
ZBA-19-V-92, ZBA-20-SU-92
April 23, 1992
Page 2
Commission and that the zoning request was filed to review the :matter of the three -car
garages on the driveway variation. Mr. Forsythe described the proposed lot sizes as
approximately 10,000 square feet with a zoning of an R-1 Single Family District. He stated
that the petitioner would like to build two custom homes and offer three -car garages as an
amenity to potential buyers, and that the driveway is necessary to serve the garage at the
widest point.
Mr. Forsythe stated that the petitioner had submitted a site plan that depicts a large home
with a three -car garage and 31 foot driveway that could be constructed on these lots. Mr.
Forsythe stated that staff had reviewed these proposed plans and that the plan demonstrates
that three -car garage could be constructed on these lots and not result in the need for any
additional variations. Mr. Forsythe concluded by saying that this is an area that is
undergoing a change from large lots (R -X); to R-1 zoning and that many new homes in this
area had been constructed with three -car garages, and that such a feature would not
significantly impact surrounding properties. He also noted that the garages are proposed
to face the interior of the lot and that the garages would not face the street, so this would
reduce the impact of the three garage doors from the public streets.
Mr. Cassidy stated he was reluctant to offer a blank approval without knowing a specific
plan. Mr. Basnik made reference to the letter submitted by the petitioner stating that they
would request no further variations with the proposed construction.
Mrs. Skowron indicated some concerns with the site plan and stated that the site plan was
designed to a maximum building size on the lot, and that this would leave no land available
for such items as sheds or above -ground swimming pools should an owner desire those types
of items. Mrs. Skowron stated she was concerned about the plan that it did not allow any
flexibility for buyers of these homes.
Mr. Malapanes explained that the site sketch was submitted only to depict that a typical
large home with a three -car garage and related driveway can be constructed and that this
was not meant to be a final plan.
Mr. Clements stated that this request did not involve a specific site plan approval but only
a special use for a three car garage and driveway variation. Mr. Clements stated that staff
had requested that the site plan be submitted so the Zoning Board could see that the
proposed construction could be accomplished on the specific lot size.
Mr. Lannon stated that the Zoning Board had done other similar, approvals and that the
approval for these two lots would not be contrary to other Zoning Board decisions or impact
the neighborhood. He believed it was reasonable to allow the amenity of a three -car garage
to be approved before a specific buyer was interested in the lot or the home. He suggested
that there be a condition, however, that the garages be a side load garage and not directly
face the street. Mr. Malapanes had no objection to this condition.
ZBA-19-V-92, ZBA-20-SU-92
April 23, 1992
Page 3
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the variation
request for a 31 foot driveway. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals
recommend approval of a 31 foot driveway with a condition that the drive be tapered to 21
feet at the street. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Mr. Basnik then asked for a motion on the special use request to allow a garage designed
to house more than two motor vehicles with a condition that the garages be a side load
garage and not face the street. ' Mr. Lannon moved that the request be approved as
summarized by the Chairman. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call:, AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
iW DAWA-
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN K -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 14, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-19-V-92, ZBA-20-SU-92
APPLICANT- JAMES MALAPANES
ADDRESS: 1230 SOUTH PRAIRIE AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
116- elp
MAovolL A
.014-1.2-
j. MNAA
•
201 202
207 208
213 214
219 220
225 226
231 232-
237
201
—
200
206
211
200 201
207
209
11230
211
210
204
206
CN
219
213
212
-
223
--
227
— 235
219
224
225
228
245
234
240
246
.5 U
WHITE
OAx
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 19,974.28 (Proposed 9,986.39 each)
% COVERAGE: 45% (shown)
F-A—R. : .35
301
N
301 302
301
300
303
305
310
312
s2
.0
z
0
307 308
311 314
.
4
30.3
302
.5 U
307
314
317 320
307
306
309
316
323 326
—
I—
309
ff
308
-i-1 —0
311
1
329 332
313-
�1 2
C"I
C14
335 C14
341 N
315
314
16
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 19,974.28 (Proposed 9,986.39 each)
% COVERAGE: 45% (shown)
F-A—R. : .35
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 14.115.0 of the Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to allow a driveway 31 feet wide instead of the maximum allowed 21 feet. Also,
the petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit under Section 14.1101.C.8 to allow a garage
designed to house more than 2 vehicles.
Summary of application: The petitioner purchased a home on a lot which consists of
24,957.29 square feet. The petitioner demolished the existing structure and is now in the
process of subdividing the property into two lots with approximately 9,986.39 square feet
each. The property is zoned "R -l" Single Family Residence.
The petitioner is proposing to build custom built homes on the two lots and would like to
offer three -car garages to the potential buyers. The driveways to service the three -car
garages are shown at 21 feet wide at the property line, and as the driveway turns to face the
garages it expands to 31 feet at its widest point.
The petitioner has indicated that the site plan is a possible scenario and not necessarily the
exact dimensions of the structure that will be built. Staff has no objection to this and would
note that this is a "worst case- scenario. The lot coverage and floor area ratio are at the
maximums allowed and the petitioner has submitted a letter to indicate that they will not
request additional variations to lot coverage or floor area ratio. Staff would remind the
petitioner that should the homes be built as indicated, no further structures or lot coverage
would be allowed. This also pertains to decks or patios for the homes.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: This area of Mount Prospect is undergoing a change
from "R -X" to "R -l" zoning and there have been many new homes constructed in the area.
The proposed lots exceed the "R-1" single family standards, and the three -car garages Will
not significantly impact the surrounding area. The garages are proposed to face the interior
of the lot and not the street which will soften the impact of the large garage doors.
No major objections or concerns have been raised by other staff members.
Staff has no objections or concerns to this request. Three -car garages are a common request
in new construction especially in expensive custom homes. Staff would also note that the
applicant has indicated that the proposed site plan only indicates the idea of a three -car
garage and wider driveway, and documentation has been submitted indicating no further
variation will be requested.
DMC:bg
March 13, 1992
Michael E. Sims
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mike:
This letter is in regards to the Malapanes subdivision.
The site plan being submitted for approval of a variation to
permit a three car garage and related driveway shows an
approximate size for the principal buildings.
I will not apply for or need, any other variations for
the site related to floor to area ratio or impervious service.
Respectfully,
0
James W. Malapanes
Owner/Builder
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 29, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-21-SU-92, LENNARD W. JENDAL
LOCATION: 102 HATLEN AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a Special Use Permit application filed by Lennard Jendal. The applicant is seeking a
Special Use Permit under Section 14.1101.C.8 to allow a tandem four -car garage.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of April 23, 1992.
At the meeting Lennard Jendal explained that the garage is needed to store antique cars
and parts. He explained that this was a hobby of his and no type of business was to be run
out of the garage. He also explained that there is a large amount of mature landscaping to
the rear and side of the property which will screen the garage from the neighbors.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the garage was an extension of the existing garage. No
additional overhead doors or driveway is to be added. He also indicated that the size of the
lot and amount of landscaping around the site would be adequate to screen the neighbors.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning
Board recommends approval of the variance request with a condition that the addition be
constructed of material similar to the existing garage.
DMC:hg
K
i' k t
: v 71 �, r �,�✓s,c..r.r,,g°
,._
777--
7/z ...
,2.2X ;ZZ) C. r�
y k,,
3 n,3 30 �,,
,r gz Pr
---
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 21 -SU -92
Hearing Date: April 23, 1992
PETITIONER:
Lennard W. Jendal
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
102 Haden Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE:
April 7, 1992
REQUEST:
The petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit
as required under Section 14.1101.C.8 of the
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow a
garage designed to house more than two motor
vehicles.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basni1c, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next request as being a special use request to allow
a garage to designed to house more than two motor vehicles at 102 Haden Avenue.
Mr. Lennard Jendal introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained that
he would like to construct an addition to an existing two -car garage. He noted that he
would like to add the equivalent of a two -car garage at the rear of the existing garage. The
proposed garage would be of the same dimensions, it would have the same siding and roof
as the existing structure, and there is existing mature landscaping to screen the garage from
surrounding property owners. Mr. Jendal stated that he would like to construct the
additional garage space in order to provide storage area for two antique automobiles. He
stated that with this additional garage space, he could store his antique cars and provide
garage parking for the family automobiles.
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the request for the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated the
petitioner is proposing to construct a tandem two -car garage being an addition to an existing
garage. The proposed addition is 484 square feet and the total garage area will be 968
square feet. The garage would be behind the existing structure and the driveway would
remain the same. There would be no changes in the driveway location to service the new
garage addition. Mr. Forsythe also indicated that lot coverage was within Ordinance
requirements.
ZBA-21-SU-92
April 23, 1992
Page 2
Lastly, Mr. Forsythe pointed out that there is a significant amount of mature landscaping
to the west and south that would screen the garage from adjoining properties, and this
should contribute to the garage having no significant impact on neighboring properties.
No one appeared to speak in favor of, or in opposition to the request.
Chairman Basnik asked for comments on the application and Mr. Brettrager pointed out his
only concern was that the potential of a home occupation or prohibited storage from being
conducted in this large garage. Mr. Jendal stated that the restoration of the antique cars
was his hobby and that sometimes there are related parts stored with those cars, but that
in no way would he be operating an automobile repair business from the structure. The
Zoning Board discussed this matter and it was determined that there are other home
occupation provisions in the Zoning Ordinance that would regulate this type of activity.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was noted that the
proposed overall garage size of 22' x 44' was extremely large but that the petitioner has a
lot of over 10,000 square feet, and that the lot coverage was within Ordinance standard of
only 33%.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Lannon moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a Special Use to
allow a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles at 102 Hatlen Avenue, with
a condition that this be a tandem garage with the addition constructed directly behind the
existing garage and that the addition be done with the same siding and roofing materials as
the existing garage. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
Upon'Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of
T'his recommendation will be
iarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
LUMAIAI*-
4. Clements,
r of Pla *
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
APRIL 14, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-21-SU-92
APPLICANT:
LENNARD W. JENDAL
ADDRESS:
102 HAnEN AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
107
. . ......... .
CENTRAL
2 1 2
4 3 4
err
6 5 6 5
7 a 7
10 3 9 10 1
12 11 12 !1 11
z
14 < 13 14 = 13
16 15 16 15
17
11%0
20 19 20 1 A
22 21 22 21
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 10,004 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 33%
F.A.R. : .22
GRINDEL
100
U&
104
108]
100
101
103
101
---4
102
104
105
105
106
107106
1 ,4
107
one
109
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 10,004 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 33%
F.A.R. : .22
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a Special Use Permit as required under Section 14.1101.C.8 of the
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow a garage designed to house more than two
motor vehicles.
Summary of application: The petitioner is proposing to construct a tandem two -car garage
to the existing detached two -car garage. The proposed addition is 484 square feet which Will
be added to the existing 484 square foot garage to bring the garage to a total of 968 square
feet. The garage will be entered through the existing door and the driveway will remain
at approximately 18 feet in width. The applicant has indicated that the garage will be used
to store antique vehicles.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The property is zoned "R -l" and consists of 10,004
square feet. There is a large amount of mature landscaping to the west and South which
should adequately screen the proposed garage from the neighboring properties. There are
no structures in the near vicinity of the proposed garage and the addition should not have
any major impact on the neighboring properties.
rom., a I I
No other departments have indicated any objections or concerns to this request.
Staff has no objections to the proposed four -car garage, provided that the building addition
match the existing structure as indicated on the application. Staff would also remind the
petitioner that should this Special Use Permit be granted, all permits and inspections must
be obtained through inspection Services.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VIECT"OR
ANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS,D OF PLANNING
DATE: APRIL 27, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-22-V-92, JAMES M. HANDSCHIEGEL
LOCATION: 1308 NORTH LAMA LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by James Handschiegel. The applicant is requesting a variance
to Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway with two curb cuts; and a variation to
Section 14.1102.A to allow 48% impervious surface coverage in the front yard instead of the
maximum allowed 35%.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of April 23, 1992.
At the meeting, James Handschiegel, the petitioner, explained that the driveway was needed
to add additional parking as well as reduce the potential of accidents when backing out of
their garage.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that staff was uncomfortable with such a large lot coverage
request. He noted that Lama Lane was not a collector or arterial street and that there are
no similar circular drives in the area. Mr. Forsythe also indicated that the petitioner could
add a parking pad or widen the driveway and increase the number of parking spaces,
without such a large lot coverage variation.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. By a vote of 0-6, the Zoning
Board recommends denial of the variance.
DMC:hg
1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 22-V-92 Hearing Date: April 23, 1992
PETITIONER: James M. Handschiegel
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1308 North Lama Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: April 7, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioners are seeking a variation to the
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance Section
14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway; also
a variation to Section 14.1102.A to allow 48%
of the front yard to be covered with impervious
surface instead of the allowed 35%.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next case as being a request to allow a circular
driveway at 1308 Lama Lane with a 48% front yard coverage rather than 35%.
Mr. James Handschiegel stated that he was proposing to construct a circular drive from his
property to allow safer exiting onto the street from the driveway and garage. He stated that
there is a safety concern with the existing driveway and the grade change from the street to
the garage, and he believed that the circular driveway would be more attractive for the front
of the house rather than just merely constructing a turn -around.
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated
that the request was filed to allow a circular driveway with a 48% front yard coverage rather
than 35%. Mr Forsythe stated that the petitioner indicated that the grade of the driveway
to the street, and the number of children in the area, makes a circular driveway safer for
drivers in the family and pedestrians an the sidewalk. However, Mr. Forsythe stated that
staff was concerned with the designof this circular driveway, as well as with the amount of
lot coverage that was requested. He pointed out that there were no other circular driveways
in the immediate area along Lama Lane and that typically the Zoning Board loops favorably
on circular driveways on neighborhood collector streets or arterial streets. He pointed out
that Lama Lane is a residential street.
ZBA•22-V-92
April 23, 1992
Page 2'
Also Mr. Forsythestated that the Engineering Division had some questions about the radius
of the driveway. They questioned whether the drive is adequate for turning movements for
vehicles. Mr. Forsythe stated that he would encourage the petitioner to consider alternatives
such as a turn -around apron rather than a circular drive, and indicated that with the high
percent of lot coverage requested, the staff would prefer to see the turn -around rather than
a circular driveway, and accordingly, staff would recommend that the circular driveway
request and the lot coverage variation be denied.
Mr. Lannon stated that he had a concern with the proposed radius and felt like this radius
on a"65 foot lot may not be sufficient for maneuvering.
Mr. Basnik questioned the dimension of the circular driveway and Mr. Handschiegel stated
that this was a 9 foot drive.
Mr. Handschiegel also addressed the lot coverage request and stated that his property abuts
a park to the rear and this large amount of open space helps justify the lot coverage
variation. He also explained that he had tested this proposed driveway radius on a similar
driveway at 2007 Chinkapinoak and that this driveway is the same as proposed with his
request. Mr. Handschiegel stated he would be happy to go out and take measurements of
this similar driveway to provide the Zoning Board with additional information.
Mrs. Skowron asked if Mr. Handschiegel had considered a turn -around apron. He
responded that he preferred the circular driveway because this would be more attractive for
his lot rather than a turn -around. Mrs. Skowron stated she was concerned with the; lot
coverage in the required front yard and stated that this Ordinance requirement is for the
purpose of regulating stormwater run-off near the street, and that it would not be
appropriate to consider the park as a way to justify this particular variation. Mr.
Handschiegel stated that the 48% lot coverage is'a maximum figure and this could be
reduced somewhat by changing the driveway dimensions.
Mr. Cassidy stated that he was concerned with the lot coverage in the required front yard
and that this circular driveway provided too much paving on a narrow 65 foot lot. He stated
that circular driveways are not necessary on residential streets and this request was merely
for the convenience of the owner.
Mr. Brettrager explained that the circular driveway was tight and that the radius may not
be sufficient for a full-sized car. He felt like a 65 foot lot could: not support a circular
driveway and that, in effect, a driveway would take 'out any amount,of significant landscaping
in the required front yard.
Chairman Basnik questioned what the real hardship was with this request and Mr.
Handschiegel stated that there was a safety factor involved and that on two occasions he has
backed cars out of his garage and collided with other automobiles parked in the driveway.
He would like to be able to maneuver on the lot and drive directly face out into the street.
ZBA-22-V-92
April 23, 1992
Page 3
Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and there was concern about
circular driveways on 65 foot lots, particularly on typical residential streets.
Mr. Brettrager suggested that perhaps the petitioner could increase the existing driveway to
the 21 foot maximum to allow more pavement width.
Mr. Basnik suggested the petitioner consider a parking pad or a tum -around apron and Mr.
Handschiegel again indicated that he believed a circular driveway was a more attractive
feature for the lot, and would be a safer design for maneuvering.
Mr. Lannon explained that he believed the circular, driveway would be a convenience only
and that the 48% lot coverage was too high to justify this request.
The Zoning Board continued discussion on the matter and believed the lot coverage
variation and the circular driveway were not necessary in this particular neighborhood and
that there was no hardship demonstrated with the request. Mr. Handschiegel offered to
research other circular driveway dimensions and radii in the neighborhood, but the Zoning
Board did not think this information would provide them with sufficient reason to approve
this request.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals
approve the request for a circular driveway and 48% front lot coverage at 1308 Lama Lane.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: None
NAYS: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 0-6.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
A. /1�' Nh�
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAR
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
APRIL 14, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-22-V-92
APPLICANT:
JAMES M. HANDSCHIEGEL
ADDRESS:
1308 NORTH LAMA LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 8,125
% COVERAGE: 37% (48% Proposed)
FAX: .23
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is requesting the following variations:
1. Variation of Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Variation of Section 14.1102.A to allow 48% of the front yard to be covered
with impervious surface instead of the allowed 35%.
Summary of application: The petitioners are seeking variations to allow a circular driveway
and subsequently an increase in the maximum allowed front yard coverage from the
maximum allowed 35% to 48%. The petitioner has indicated that the pitch of the driveway
and the number of children in the area, along with the number of drivers in the family, a
circular driveway would greatly improve the situation.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: Staff is concerned with the design of the circular
driveway as well as the amount of lot coverage that is requested. There are no other
circular drives in this area and Lama Lane is not designed as an arterial or collector street.
There were questions from the other departments regarding the ability to maneuver a
vehicle on the circular driveway as designed. The Engineering Division has indicated that
a minimum of 28'-30' radius along the outer edge of the drive is needed to adequately
maintain a vehicle on the curve.
Staff would encourage the applicant to be prepared to discuss the design of the driveway as
shown on the site plan. A detailed site plan which indicates the actual radius of the
driveway should be submitted. The Zoning Ordinance allows driveways with a width of 21
feet for two -car garages. The petitioner may want to investigate the possibility of widening
the driveway or adding a turn -around instead of the circular driveway. Staff would prefer
one of the above mentioned alternatives to the circular drive. This alternative would also
serve to reduce lot coverage in the required front yard.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXONGE MANAGER
DI
FROM: DAVID M. CLEME7S� RECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 29, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-23-SU-92, MARIO GAMBINO
LOCATION: 309 NORTH WESTGATE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a Special Use permit application filed by Mario Gambino. The applicant is requesting a
Special Use Permit to allow the installation of a satellite antenna with a diameter of 10 ft.
at 309 North Westgate.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of April 23, 1992.
At the meeting, Maria Dalmazio, representing the petitioner, explained that the satellite
dish would be located in an acceptable location and screened with landscaping,
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the Zoning Ordinance required that the satellite dish be
located out of the rear and side yards. He indicated that because the lot is very large, the
petitioner should be able to move the dish to a location acceptable to the neighbors, as well
as within the requirements of the Ordinance.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board
recommends approval of the Special Use Permit with the following conditions:
- The dish is to be located out of the required rear and side yards and placed at the
same setback as the dog house; and
. Adequate landscaping is to be provided.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 23 -SU -92 Hearing Date: April 23, 1992
PETT17IONER: Mario Gambino
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 309 North Westgate
PUBLICATION DATE: April 7, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a Special Use
Permit as required by Section 14.1101.C.6 of the
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow the
construction of a satellite dish which is ten (10)
foot in radius.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/IN'T'ERESTED PARTIES: Michelle- Nicholson
James Griffin, 312 Marcella Lane
Chairman Basnik introduced this case as being a Special Use* request to allow the
construction of a satellite dish at 309 North Westgate.
Ms. Maria Dalmazio introduced herself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that
she is the sister-in-law of the petitioner and that she would be presenting the case for Mr.
Gambino. She explained that Mr. & Mrs. Gambino would have a language problem in
communicating their request to the Zoning Board, so she felt like she could assist in making
this brief presentation. She explained that the Gambino's would like to construct a satellite
dish in their large rear yard and that the location is isolated away from adjoining property
owners. She stated that Mr. Gambino is a landscaping contractor and that he would
adequately screen the antenna as required by the Zoning Ordinance.
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff request for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe stated that the proposed location on the site plan shows the dish at a 15 foot
setback from the rear yard. Mr. Forsythe explained that the installation needs to be at least
at the 25 foot setback, out of the required rear yard. Mr. Forsythe continued to explain that
the satellite dish met all appropriate requirements as to height and diameter, and that the
plan submitted with the application shows sufficient amount of screening for the installation.
Mr. Lannon noted that the vertical pole for the antenna has been installed and that this
would have to be relocated out of the 25 foot required yard.
ZBA-23-SU-92
April 23, 1992
Page 2
Ms. Dalmazio explained that the installation would be moved out of the 25 foot required
yard.
Mr. Basnik then read a letter from the property owner to the north who indicated no
objections to the proposed special use, and a letter from the property owner to the east on
Marcella who did object to the antenna installation.
Michelle Nicholson addressed
who are those property owner
see the satellite dish so close b
on the plan, would not sufficii
Mr. James Griffin, 312 Marc(
would like to see it relocated
that the Zoning Ordinance r(
yard and 10 feet from the side
antenna dish, and discussed c
indicated that the satellite di:
setback as the existing dog n
Zoning Board and stated that she represents her parents
the east. She explained that her parents did not want to
rear lot fine and noted that the landscaping, as proposed
screen the antenna.
: ane, stated he has no objections to the satellite dish but
V from that common rear lot line. Mr. Lannon explained
es the satellite dish to be set back 25 feet from the rear
I and the Zoning Board discussed the final location of the
alternative locations with Ms. Dalmazio. Ms. Dalmazio
►uld be moved back to a line approximately at the same
id dog house.
Mrs. Skowron asked if the shrubs, as proposed, would grow to a height of 8 feet to
sufficiently screen the antenna. Ms. Dalmazio stated that the 5 foot plantings would grow
to that height at maturity. She again stated that Mr. Gambino is a landseaping contractor
and that he can select the best materials for this screening.
There being no further discussii
Saviano moved that the ZoniA
Permit to allow. a satellite dish
Brettrager subject to moving
installation at a setback apprc
landscaping provided.
Upon Roll Call: AYES:
NAYS:
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0
This recommendation will be ft
Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
3oard of Appeals recommend approval of a Special Use
309 North Westgate. The motion was seconded by Mr.
D antenna out of the required yard and providing its
nately the same as the dog house with the appropriate
innon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik
one
raided to the Village Board for their consideration.
ulpy�
M. Clements,
)r of Planniniz
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
APRIL 14, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-23-SU-92
APPLICANT:
MARIO GAMBINO
ADDRESS:
309 NORTH WESTGATE
LOCATION MAP:
ta P A GWA I'a
MARLIO bAmbNo
B01 At W 9
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -I Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 41,945-33 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 14%
F.A.R. : .09
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is requesting a Special Use Permit as required by Section 14.1101.C.6 of the
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow the construction of a satellite dish which is ten
(10) foot in radius.
....I ... . i 1 M1.±
Summary of application: The petitioners are requesting a Special Use Permit in order to
complete the installation of a satellite dish with a diameter of 10 feet and a height of 8 feet.
The dish is to be located 15 feet from the side and rear yards and landscaping along the side
and rear property lines is proposed as 11 Techny Arborvitae (evergreens) which are 5 feet
in height.
The Zoning Ordinance requires .satellite antennas exceeding forty inches in diameter to
obtain a Special Use Permit. There are general criteria which must be met in order to
obtain the Special Use Permit.
a. The maximum diameter of a dish shall not exceed 11 feet. The proposed dish is 10
feet in diameter.
b. The dish shall be located entirely behind the rear building line and shall not be
located within any required side or rear yard. The site plan submitted for the
satellite dish indicates the location to be within the 25 foot required rear yard. Staff
would suggest that the dish be relocated to meet this requirement. This would mean
shifting the location a minimum of 10 feet to the west.
C. Any dish exceeding 40 inches in diameter shall be mounted on the ground. The
proposed satellite dish is mounted on the ground.
d. No more than one satellite antenna shall be installed on a lot. One satellite antenna
is being proposed.
e. No dish shall be located closer than ten feet from a principal building or structure.
The proposed location as well as the suggested relocation exceed 10 feet from the
principal building.
E Any ground -mounted dish shall not exceed 15 feet in height above grade. The dish
is proposed to be 8 feet in height.
g. All ground -mounted satellite antennas shall be installed and landscaped so as to be
compatible with surrounding properties. The proposed site plan indicates landscaping
to screen the dish from neighboring properties. With the relocation 10 feet to the
west, staff would ask the petitioner to be prepared to discuss with the Zoning Board
members where the landscaping will be placed.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The subject property contains 41,945 square feet and
is zoned R-1, Single Family. This is a large lot with comparable lots to the north and south.
The lots to the east are smaller, however, theyare175 feet deep. By placing the dish 15
feet into the side and 25 feet from the rear of the property, there is a minimum of 50 feet
between the dish and the building line of the properties to the east. With the setbacks, the
existing fence and the proposed landscaping, staff feels that there should be no major impact
to the surrounding property owners.
It has been brought to staffs attention that there have been several complaints to the
Environmental Health Coordinator regarding the possibility of a kennel being operated on
this property. A kennel is defined in the Village Code as a place where more than three
dogs or cats are kept. Attached is a memo from the Health Coordinator regarding this
matter.
No other issues or concerns were brought up by other departments in this review and staff
would like to note to the petitioner that should the Special Use Permit be granted for the
proposed satellite dish, all building permits and inspections must be obtained.
SUMlam; RYIRECOMMENDATJON
Staff has no objections to the proposed satellite dish and would recommend approval of the
Special Use Permit to allow a ground -mounted satellite dish subject to the relocation of the
dish out of the required rear yard. The lot is large and the staff -suggested location and
screening should not have any negative impact on the surrounding properties. Staff would
recommend to the petitioner that compliance with all Village Codes regarding the dog
kennel be complied with.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 29, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-24-V-92, JOHN AND GRACE KINSELLA
LOCATION: 508 SOUTH OWEN STREET
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variation from Section 14.1103 to allow a floor area ratio of .45 instead of the maximum
allowed .35 in order to construct a second story addition and a sun room.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of April 23, 1992.
At the meeting, John and Grace Kinsella explained that they would rather add on to their
existing home to accommodate their needs than relocate to a new home.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, stated that the request would only increase the total lot coverage by
3%. He also indicated that the architect has matched the existing architecture and that
there are other two-story dwellings nearby.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board
of Appeals recommends approval of the variance.
DMC:hg
5
'... ?,- 7 'a " -
G4
Sz
2!2' d'
o.
_10
4
(I
ti
ti
(I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 24-V-92
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: April 23, 1992
John R. & Grace Kinsella
508 South Owen Street
April 7, 1992
The petitioner is seeking a variation from
Section 14.1103 of the Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to allow a Floor Area Ratio of .45
instead of the maximum allowed .35 in order
to construct a second story addition and a sun
room to an existing dwelling in an R-1 Single
Family Residential District.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
None
Chairman Basnik introduced the next agenda item as a variation to allow a floor area ratio
of .45 instead of the maximum .35 in order to construct a second story addition and a sun
room to the home at 508 South Owen Street.
Mr. & Mrs. Kinsella introduced themselves to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated they
are proposing to construct the additions to provide additional room for their growing family,
Mr. Kinsella indicated that they had considered relocating out of the Village but had made
the decision that they preferred to keep their family in the community, and that the best
approach to satisfy their needs was to do the addition to their existing home. They
preferred to stay in the community and believed that the variations requested were
reasonable in helping them meet the goal of keeping their family in the Village. He stated
that the total square footage of the home with addition would be about 3,600 square feet
which calculates to 600 square feet more than the allowable floor area ratio. He stated that
the existing house is a partial two-story and that the addition would make the house a
complete two-story structure.
ZBA-24-V-92
April 223, 1992
Page 2
Concerning the proposed sun room, an addition, Mr. Kinsella noted that the total overall
lot coverage is well below the maximum of the Zoning Ordinance. He stated that lot
coverage is 40% with 45% permitted.
Mr. Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning :Board of Appeals. He
explained that there are other two-story homes in this area so the proposed construction
would not be out of character with the neighborhood and that the proposed additions meet
all applicable setback requirements. Mr. Forsythe stated that the elevations of the addition
would match the existing house and the character, so the design would blend in with the
existing house.
Architect DeLattre introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that a portion of a
rear deck or patio would be removed to allow construction of the sun room.
Mr. Basnik questioned the lot coverage figures for this proposal and Mr. Forsythe stated
that lot coverage is proposed at 40% and the Zoning Ordinance allows a 45% maximum.
Mr. Cassidy explained that he believed this .was a reasonable request and that it helped
satisfy the needs of the petitioner without requesting extreme variations of setbacks.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and noted that the second floor addition
would have no adverse impact on adjoining properties inasmuch as the addition was being
built within the same bulk setbacks of the existing house.
Mr. Kinsella thanked Mr. Forsythe for his work in helping him prepare the Zoning Board
application.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Cassidy moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of the variation to allow a .45
floor area ratio rather than .35 to allow an addition at 508 South Owen Street. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Lannon.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK C IR3VIAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEM NTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
APRIL 14, 1992
ZBA-24-V-92
JOHN AND GRACE KINSELLA
508 SOUTH OWEN STREET
Me� jy" • �•
/'
+r yrs
wV"'/�I �In505
John
•
1 •
9N
`c
to
°
*
`°
o
fn
O
420
416
723
603
602
5MA DONEE
605 604
c
604
501 500
501 500
501 500
701 703
503 502
505 504
-+ 507506
x509
N 511 510
503 502
503 502
503 502
504
505 504
505 504
507 506
507 506
7
09 510
511 512`
509 508
511 510
509 508
511 510"
513 512
513 512
515 514
515 514
513 512
513 514
517 516
517 516
515 514
515
519 518
519 518
1 600
COUNCIL
501
503
601 600
601 703
603 605 602
611 604
611 606
613 608
615 610
615 612
617 614
603 602
603
602
603 602
605 604
605
604
605 604
607 606
607
606
607 606
609 608
609
608
609 608
609 610
611
610
611 610
613 612
613
612
613 612
615 614
615
614
615 614
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 8,437.12
% COVERAGE: 37% (4(% Proposed)
F -A -R.: .28 (.45 Proposed)
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The peti.,ioner is seeking a variation from Section 14.1103 of the Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to allow a Floor Area Ratio of .45 instead of the maximum allowed .35 in order
to construct a second story addition and a sun room to an existing dwelling in an R-1 Single
Family Residential District.
Summary of application: The applicants are seeking to add a second story addition and a
sun room on to their home. The application indicates that the space is for a master
bedroom, bathroom, laundry room, general purpose room and a sun room. The applicants
have indicated that they would rather upgrade their existing home to meet their needs than
have to relocate elsewhere. Elevations of the proposed additions have been submitted.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The proposed additions meet the Ordinance for
setbacks and lot coverage. Actual lot coverage will only be increased by approximately 3%.
The architectural elevations indicate that the additions will match the existing architecture.
The neighboring properties are generally one-story structures, however, there are two 2 -
story homes across the street from the subject property and others on the nearby blocks.
No major objections or concerns have been brought up by other departments.
Staff has no objections to the proposed variation. While the additions increase the floor
area ratio of the lot, the setbacks are maintained and the lot coverage remains below the
maximum allowed. The architect has done a good job of matching the current architecture
and staff feels that no major impact will be felt by the neighbors. Staff would recommend
approval of the request.
DMC:hg
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
1
4' o
1
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 6, 1992
SUBJECT: AGREEMENT FOR PARKING IN A VILLAGE PARKING LOT
BETWEEN MAPLE STREET TOWNHOMES ASSOCIATION
AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Attached is the third or fourth draft Agreement. We have had discussions with
Mr. Ramesh Gandhi, of 342 South Maple Street. He has not been satisfied with the
original agreements that we have had. He has tried to extend the time during the day
as well as the time for the number of months in which they want parking. I have
received phone calls from other members of the Association that indicate he is not
speaking on their behalf but it has become very convoluted.
In a conversation with Mr. Gandhi, he has indicated to me that he is dissatisfied with
the last Agreement. Staff feels very strongly that it is a reasonable Agreement to be
used for any and all instances in the future for people who may wish to park in the
parking lot. It is fair, easily understood and also is one that would not cause problems
in the future.
Mr. Gandhi has indicated he will be present on April 14 and is upset that this has not
been done sooner. When Mr. Gandhi was reminded that he has rejected every other
Agreement up to this point in time, it did not seem to concern him.
We would suggest that the attached Agreement makes sense and should be approved as
is. I would strongly urge the Board to make sure that it is very clear with Mr. Gandhi
that the Agreement is with the Homeowners Association and the signature should be
after a vote of the Homeowners Association.
JOHN FULTOP+i DIXON
JFD/rcc
attachment
MAYOR
GERALD L PARLEY
TRUSTEES
MARK VV BUSSE
GEORGE A CLOWES
TIMOTHY J CORCOPAN
LEO FLOROS
PAUL WM HOEFERT
, PVANA K WtLKS
VILLAGE MANAGER Village of Mount Prospect
JOHN FULTON '- ':;N
VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount ProSpect, IIIIncls 60056
CAROL A FIELDS
Phone: 706 / 392-6000
Fax: 708 / 392-6022
March 31, 1992
Mr. Ramesh Gandhi
342 South Maple Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Mr. Gandhi:
Enclosed is a revised agreement allowing overnight use of the Maple Street
commuter parking lot. The months of use have been extended to November 30. Daily
hours and the fee remain the same.
This agreement will be considered by the Village Board at the Committee -of -the -
Whole meeting on Tuesday, April 14, at 7:30 p.m.
As a reminder, if you wish to have the agreement executed, we will require a letter
from the President of the Association, and a copy of the minutes from the Association
meeting approving the agreement.
DMC:hg
Enclosure
cc: John Fulton Dixon
Sincerely,
kt,A /0' 0�
David M. Clements, AICP
Director of Planning
and Zoning
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
MAPLE STREET TOWNHOME HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION
AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, the Maple Street Townhome Homeowners Association (hereinafter
"Association") desire to use the Village of Mount Prospect commuter parking lot located at
as a night parking area for its
residents; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is willing to permit them to do so
according to the terms of this Agreement;
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Association shall be permitted to use a maximum of twenty-eight (28) of the
commuter spaces as designated by the Village of Mount Prospect. This number represents
one parking space per unit for the Maple Street townhomes. Users of the parking spaces
shall park in the appropriately designated area.
2. Parking in the commuter lot shall be permitted only from April 1st through
November 30th, during the term of this Agreement.
3. Automobiles may not be parked in the commuter lot prior to 7:00 p.m. and must
be removed by 7.20 a.m. each morning. Failure to adhere to these hours will result in the
issuance of a citation and towing of the vehicle by the Village's authorized towing
contractor.
1-7
4. Members of the Association shall pay to the Village of Mount Prospect S~Y:60 per;
a
day, Monday through Friday as a fee for the use of these parking spaces. Payment shall be ? .
by space number at the existing cash box. Failure to pay the daily fee will result in the
issuance of a citation and towing of the vehicle by the Village's authorized towing
contractor.
5. The Homeowners shall be responsible for the issuance of a sticker or placard
indicating that a vehicle is permitted to park in the designated parking area. Failure to
display the sticker or placard will result in the issuance of a citation and towing of the
vehicle by the Village's authorized towing contractor.
6. It is understood that it is the obligation of the Association to advise its members
of the requirements of this Agreement. Any continued violation of this Agreement by any
member of the Association shall be sufficient reason to revoke this Agreement with the
Association.
7. This Agreement shall be in effect through November 30, 1992 and shall be
extended for a period of twelve (12) months thereafter for each succeeding year provided
neither party gives written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement at least thirty (30)
days prior to November 30th of each year.
8. The minutes from the Association meeting authorizing execution of this
Agreement shall be attached hereto.
DATED this day of , 1992.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BY -
MAPLE STREET TOWNHOME HOMEOWNERS ASSN.
BY:
4-26-'92
From: Ramesh N. Gandhi
342 So. Ma -ole
Mt. Prospect, 111. 60056
To
John Dixon
Village Ynager
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 So. Emerson
Mt. Prospect.
Dear Sir,
Kindly refer to your letter dated 4-15-192.
At the General Meeting held on 4-21-'92, the Asso. has
approved the Agreement send by you with minor corrections. Acopy of the
agreement signed by the President as well as Secretary with due correction
is attached herewith. I hope this will brin an end to this chapter.
ARthe reason for corrections i-6 that there is another Assoc
on Maple St. In addition, we are known as Mt. Prospect Townhome Asso.
Please let me know the date from which we can start parki-
-ing in the commuter parking lot, to enable all members to be informwd
by a circular. As agreed by you, the parking fees for the remaining
period for 1992 will be in proportion to its usage.
Yours Sincerely
.'-
fzP-'-'ezL tq (KO111�11-z
( Ramesh N. Gandhi )
TO: ALL HOMEOWNERS & RENTERS
FROM: THE BOARD
DATE: 4/22/92
RE: GENERAL MEETING, 4/21/92
Thanks for the great turnout last night. We really got a lot
accomplished.
The turnout was as follows:
In Person: Gredell
Loos/Kurtz
Savage
Johnson
Gilbertson
Horwitz
Koontz
Kovac
Ramesh
Desmore
Crosley
Bowler
Kressman
Total Represented: 20
Spielmann
Hall
Bandemer
Bicek
Chang
Herchenbac
h
Watson
A new board was voted on and unanimously approved for the
1992/1993 season. The new board will be:
Hannah Horwitz
Ramesh Gandhi
Brenda Desmore
Ernie Savage
Lynn Hall
While the board will decide among themselves who will hold what
titles, Hannah has volunteered to remain as treasurer.
Therefore, please continue submitting your dues and payments
to Hannah.
Davey Tree Service
This service was discussed for the May - November 1992 season
and will include inspection and treatment of all trees on the
grounds. A vote was taken and unanimously passed for this
service and the cost of $496 will be paid by the treasury.
at
Ramesh Gandhi has been working with the Village of Mt. Prospect
over the last several months regarding addtional parking for
the complex. They have finally come to an agreement and will
consist of the following:
Parking will be allowed at the Southwesto r of the commuter
parking lot (nearest to Lions Park) from 44;1 through
November 30 only. Overnight parking can begin at 7:00 p.m. and
cars must be out by 7:30 a.m.
Any cars not removed by 7:30 a.m. are subject to ticket or tow.
The cost is $120 total for theS month period. Vehicle permit
stickers must be purchased from the Village and can only be
purchased for the entire 2 month period. They are not available
on a month to month r in i The other � months. December,
January & Febrvar,
i�g is still available at Lions Park for
$30 per month. The Busse Marathon station on the corner is
also an option but the monthly cost there is $35 per month.
While this is not a perfect solution, at least we have something.
To recap, parking from $/1 to 11/30 in the commuter parking lot
for $15 per month and Lions from 12/1 to 3/30 for $30 per month.
This solution was voted upon and unanimously approved by all
represented members. A copy of the agreement with the Village
is attached.
House Numbers
Once again, new house numbers for the front was discussed. Jim
Crosley replaced his numbers with brass numbers. They are
available almost anywhere from Venture to Courtesy to True.
Value Hardware. They cost about $3.50 to $7.00 per number. Jim
left the wood board up but just removed and replaced the
numbers. Therefore, we suggest anyone that wants to change
their front house numbers do so in this manner to retain a
consistent look.
�LAGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
TOWNHOME HOM*0% RS'ASSOCIATION
1�m THE vir
AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, the 44a*e-�,At ownhome Homeewae, A"Association (hereinafter
"Association") desire to use the Village of Mount Prospect commuter parking lot located at
JQ1, South Mgpit, Street, Mount Prospgrtllljnoias an overnight parking area for its
residents; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is willing to permit them to do so
according to the terms of this Agreement;
IT IS THEREFORE AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. The Association shall be permitted to use a maximum of twenty-eight (28) of the
commuter spaces as designated by the Village of Mount Prospect. This number represents
one parking space per unit for the Maple Street townhomes. Users of the parking spaces
shall park in the spaces at the southwest comer of the parking lot.
2. Parking in the commuter lot shall be permitted only from April lst through
November 30th, during the term of this Agreement.
3. Automobiles may not be parked in the commuter lot prior to 7:00 p.m. and must
be removed by 7:30 a.m. each morning. Failure to adhere to these hours will result in the
issuance of a citation and towing of the vehicle by the Village's authorized towing
contractor.
4. Members of the Association shall pay to the Village of Mount Prospect $120.00
for the fee to park at the Maple Street lot from April 1st through November 30th of each
year. Payments shall be made no later than March 31 of each year at the Finance
Department at Village Hall. Association members will be issued a Mount Prospect parking
sticker. Such sticker shall be displayed with the Association sticker described in Paragraph
5.
5. The Homeowners shall be responsible for the issuance of a sticker or placard
indicating that a vehicle is permitted to park in the designated parking area. Failure to
display the sticker will result in the issuance of a citation and towing of the vehicle by the
Village's authorized towing contractor.
6. It is understood that it is the obligation of the Association to advise its members
of the requirements of this Agreement. Any continued violation of this Agreement by any
member of the Association shall be sufficient reason to revoke this Agreement with the
Association.
7. This Agreement shall be in effect through November 30, 1992 and shall be
extended for a period of twelve (12) months thereafter for each succeeding year provided
neither party gives written notice of its intent to terminate the Agreement at least thirty (30)
days prior to November 30th of each year.
8. The minutes from the Association meeting authorizing execution of this
Agreement shall be attached hereto.
DATED this day of,, r �, 1992.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BY:
MM,:�h
=TOWNHO L
BY: /
CAF/
4/29/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
THE MOUNT PROSPECT TOWNHOME ASSOCIATION GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LINCOLN AND MAPLE STREETS
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Townhome Association, generally located
at the northwest corner of Lincoln and Maple Streets, in the
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois experience a shortage in
parking spaces for the residents of the Association; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect owns and operates a parking
lot at the northeast corner of Maple and Lincoln Streets, commonly
known as the Maple Street Parking Lot; and
WHEREAS, representatives of the Mount Prospect Townhome Association
have submitted a request to the Village of Mount Prospect for
permission to utilize the Maple Street Parking Lot for overnight
parking; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
have drafted an Agreement between the Village and the Mount
Prospect Townhome Association granting permission for specified
vehicles to utilize the Maple Street Parking Lot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect have agreed to permit specified residents of the
Mount Prospect Townhome Association to park their vehicles in the
Maple Street Parking Lot, the terms and conditions are set forth
in the Agreement attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
day of
I
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
, 1988.
M 'M
O"2U4
LW�
Chicago Assembly of God
618 E. Golf Rd.* Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
(708)255-2440
To: The Village of Mount Prospect
Attn: Director of the planing and Zoning
April 13,1992
Re: The Chicago Assembly of God zoning variation permit
Pern.41t '.Tc; 4311, 1`1-suad date: 1141ay 21, 1991
I hereby request that the above project permit to be extended one
more year.
Thank you for your cooperation
Truly
Chicago Assembly of God
.,0 9
Representive: Paul Y. Lsa
3525 W. Paterson Suite 220
ChIcago, 111ino-Jr. 60659
312)463-2884
"And the Lord to the church daily such as should be saved" —Act 2:47—
y- 6M4
CAF/
4/29/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4311
BY EXTENDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR
VARIATIONS GRANTED TO THE CHICAGO ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH
LOCATED AT 618 EAST GOLF ROA
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect did adopted Ordinance No. 4311 entitled "An
Ordinance Granting Variations for Commonly Known as 618 East Golf
Road" at their regular meeting held May 21, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the variations granted through the passage of Ordinance
No. 4311 contained the provision that building permits must be
secured within one year from the date of passage; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested that the one year effective date
contained in Ordinance No. 4311 be extended for one additional
year.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That SECTION FOUR of Ordinance No. 4311 is hereby
amended by extending the effective date for the variations being
the subject of Ordinance No. 4311 for one additional year.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after is passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
P.V4 *4
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
MY tau
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM; Director of Public works
DATE: April 20, 1992
SUBJ: IDOT Resolution
In the past the State of Illinois has required municipalities to
pass a resolution on an annual basis to make excavations on
their right-of-ways. This year they are increasing the length
of the permit to two years to save time, effort and paperwork.
Recommend passage of resolution.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
cc: Village Engineer
IDOTRESO.LTN/FILES/STREETS
CAF/
4/30/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION IN LIEU OF A SURETY BOND IN ORDER
TO PERFORM SPECIFIED CONSTRUCTION WORK
WITHIN STATE OF ILLINOIS RIGHTS-OF-WAY
WHEREAS, the village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois,
desires to undertake, in the years 1992 and 1993, the location,
construction, operation and maintenance of driveways and street
returns, watermains, sanitary and storm sewers, street light,
traffic signals, sidewalk, landscaping, etc., on State highways,
within the Village of Mount Prospect, which by law and/or agreement
come under the jurisdiction and control of the Department of
Transportation of the State of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, an individual working permit must be obtained from the
Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois prior to any
of the aforesaid installations being constructed either by the
Village of Mount Prospect or by a private person or firm under
contract and supervision of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect hereby pledges its
good faith and guarantees that all work shall be performed in
accordance with the conditions of the permit to be granted by the
Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois and to hold
the State of Illinois harmless on account on any damages that may
occur to persons or property during the prosecution of such work,
and assume all liability for damages to persons or property due to
accidents or otherwise by reason of the work which is to be
performed under the provision of said permit.
I
SECTION TWO: That authorized officials of the Village of Mount
Prospect are hereby instructed and authorized to sign said working
permit on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1992.
Village of Mount Prospect '
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Jeffrey A. Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator] 0,-r
DATE: April 23, 1992
SUBJECT: Illinois Department of Transportation
Mimicipal Agreement of Undgr5tgpding.
The Engineering staff has reviewed the subject agreement and has had
subsequent discussions with I.D.O.T. The agreement will allow the Village to proceed with
maintenance and construction of streets funded by the State Illinois without requiring the
approval and supervision of I.D.O.T. This agreement will streamline our planning and
bidding processes for the MFT paving programs. No time will be lost waiting for I.D.O.T.
approval, and less paper work and submittals to I.D.O.T, will be necessary. The items listed
in the agreement under "the Municipality Agrees" are the basic items required for MFT
programs and are presently being performed by the Engineering staff, however they require
I.D.O.T. review and approval at this time.
The Illinois Department of Transportation has given the Village this opportunity because
of the good working relationship they have had with the Engineering Staff, particularly Fred
Tennyson, who has been our project engineer for the paving programs for the past 10 years.
CAF/
4/29/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RELATIVE TO PLAN REVIEW. MAINTENMCE AND CONSTRUCTION
WHEREAS, the Illinois Department of Transportation has expressed
interest in entering into an Agreement of Understanding with the
Village of Mount Prospect relative to the maintenance and
construction of streets within the Village, which maintenance and
construction and funded by Motor Fuel Tax Funds,; and
WHEREAS, in order to perform maintenance and/or construction
projects being funded by Motor Fuel Tax Funds, it has been the
requirement of the Illinois Department of Transportation to obtain
written approval before projects can commence; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Agreement of Understanding, being the subject
of this Resolution, will give the Village of Mount Prospect
permission to conduct the plan review, maintenance and/or
construction without prior approval of the Illinois Department of
Transportation; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect as determined that the best interest of the Village of
Mount Prospect would be served by entering into said Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE, That the Mayor and Board of Trustees do hereby
authorize execution of an Agreement of Understanding between the
Village of Mount Prospect and the Illinois Department of
Transportation relative to street maintenance and construction
projects, which Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "All.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village clerk
I
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
AGREEMENT OF UNDERSTANDING FOR MAINTENANCE
This Agreement, by and between the DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
State of Illinois, hereinafter referred to as "Department" and the
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, of the State of Illinois, hereinafter
referred to as "Municipality".
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, the Illinois Highway Code provides that the DEPARTMENT,
upon satisfying itself that the Village Engineer's office in a
municipality is adequately organized, staffed, equipped and
financed to discharge satisfactorily the duties and requirements
of Section 7-203.2, may grant a municipality permission to
construct or maintain streets or highways or sections thereof when
such projects are financed in whole or in part with any funds
received from the State except Federal -aid funds, without approval
and supervision of the Department, providing the municipality will
enter into an agreement of understanding with the Department; and
WHEREAS, this agreement addresses the approval of Municipal Motor
Fuel Tax maintenance and expenditures; and
WHEREAS, the MUNICIPALITY has complied with the requirements of
Section 7-301 of the Illinois Highway Code.
NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the covenants and
agreements herein contained, the parties agree as follows:
THE MUNICIPALITY AGREES:
1. That it will effect a coordinated annual maintenance program
in accordance with the intent of the law;
2. That it will follow the procedure set forth in Section 7-203
of the Illinois Highway Code for the maintenance of any street
or highway;
3. It will supply the DEPARTMENT two copies of its maintenance
estimates and appropriation Resolutions for the maintenance
work to be performed. Also, a listing of all contract
maintenance projects showing the limits, description, and
estimated cost of each project;
4. That it will supply the DEPARTMENT, for record purposes, two
copies of a maintenance expenditure statement showing how the
funds were expended upon completion of the work;
5. That the maintenance work will be performed in accordance with
the policies and procedures adopted by the Bureau of Local
Roads and Streets. Modifications and deviations proposed by
the MUNICIPALITY must be approved by the DEPARTMENT through
its District Engineer;
6. To advertise for bids and let contracts for maintenance work
and/or materials to the lowest responsible bidder, or with the
concurrence of the DEPARTMENT, do the work itself through its
officers, agents and employees;
7. That it will perform or cause to be performed maintenance and
material inspections required in connection with its
maintenance projects using procedures acceptable to the
DEPARTMENT. The MUNICIPALITY will document the inspections
and make said documentation available to the DEPARTMENT at all
times;
8. That it will make all records available to personnel of the
DEPARTMENT fQr review and/or audit for a minimum of three (3)
years after completion of the work;
Agreement
Page 2 of 2
9. That use of Motor Fuel Tax Funds other than specified in this
agreement will require approval by the DEPARTMENT.
The DEPARTMENT AGREES:
1. That in view of the foregoing covenants, its approval of
Municipal Motor Fuel Tax maintenance projects and expenditures
will not be required except as hereinabove specified.
IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED:
1. That the provisions of this Agreement shall not apply to any
Federally funded maintenance -w-.rk and/or state funded
maintenance work not administered under Motor Fuel Tax
policies and procedures;
2. The DEPARTMENT may make periodic inspections of the job site,
if it deems necessary, to satisfy itself that the work is
being done in compliance with departmental policies And
procedures;
3. This Agreement shall remain in full force and effect unless
terminated by either party. This Agreement shall be
temporarily suspended during any period the MUNICIPALITY does
not have a full time Village Engineer.
Executed by the MUNICIPALITY this day of I , 1992.
MUNICIPALITY:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Village Engineer
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Executed by the DEPARTMENT this _ day of
DEPARTMENT:
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
TRANSPORTATION
DEPARTMENT OF
Director of Highways
1992.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk -
EMY
FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinato
riptily—
DATE: April 22, 1992
SUBJECT: Mutoh-American
500 W. Algonquin Road
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
improvements has been satisfactorily completed and I recommend approval of this project.
Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
JAW:m
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: MUTOH - AMERICAN
LOCATION: 500 W. ALGONOUIN ROAD
DATE: APRIL 1, 1992
7,�
ES NO
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: ENGINEER
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ENGINEER
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL: PLANNING &
ZONING
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVALBy 'FIRE PREVENTION
L G
,E
r
L
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE V
WATER MAIN -FT. SIZE
SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE
STORM SEWER FT. SIZE
ROADWAYS
SIDEWALKS 675 SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS
STREET LIGHTS #
PARKWAY TREES #
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED
WATER MAIN
3651 - 10". 2851 1211
SANITARY SEWER
351 - 611
STORM SEWER
5081 - 1211, 481 1511
ROADWAY
PARKING LOTS
3,600 SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19--
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk
FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinatori
DATE: April 22, 1992
SUBJECT: J & L Industrial Supply Parking Lot Addition
2200 South Busse Road
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
improvements have been satisfactorily completed and I recommend approval of this project.
Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
JAW:m
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: J & L INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY PARKING LOT ADDITION
LOCATION: .1200 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
DATE: APRIL 1. 1992
YES NO
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: ENGINEER
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ENGINEER
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL:-' PLANNING &
,-, ZONING
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FIRE PREVENTION
PUBLIC IMPRMMBNTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VIL G
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
ROADWAYS
SIDEWALKS
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS
STREET LIGHTS #
PARKWAY TREES #
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
PRIVATE IMPRQVEMENTS APPROVED
WATER MAIN
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
ROADWAY
PARKING LOTS 940 SO. YDS.
LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19
Village Clerk
CAF/
4/30/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING A SETTLEMENT
WITH THE COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS COMPANY
BEING A PARTY TO CASE NO. 87 CH 3393
WHEREAS, certain litigation between the Village of Mount Prospect
and Beverly Bank, as Trustee under Trust Number 8-1551 (Cook County
School Bus Company) known as Case No. 87 CH 3393, is pending in the
Circuit Court of Cook County; and
WHEREAS, the Cook County School Bus Company, being a party in Case
No. 87 CH 3393, has reached a compromise and settlement agreement,
which agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof
as Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize the Mayor to sign and the
Village Clerk to attest her signature to the compromise and
settlement agreement as it relates to the Cook County School Bus
Company, being a party in Case Number 87 CH 3393, which agreement
is attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
._
AM - MUTUAL. REL2091191
MUTUAL RELEASE
THIS MUTUAL RELEASE is entered into on this 3rd day of
September, 1991, by and between the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
ILLINOIS (hereinafter referred to as the "Village"), by and
through its Village President and the members of its Village
Board of Trustees (hereinafter referred to collectively as the
"Corporate Authorities"), on the one hand, and BEVERLY BANK, AS
TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 1968 AND KNOWN
AS TRUST NUMBER 8-1551 (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"),
and COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC., an Illinois corporation
(hereinafter referred to as the "Beneficiary"), on the other
hand.
WITNESSETH:
Village, Corporate, Authorities, Owner and Beneficiary, the
undersigned, for and in consideration of the execution of a
Settlement Agreement by Village and Corporate Authorities, on the
one hand, and Owner and Beneficiary on the other hand, as of
September 2/aLl 1991, and for other good and valuable
consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, including but not limited to the agreement of the
parties to enter into a Consent to Permanent Injunction in Case
No. 87 CH 3393, nor pending in the Circuit Court of Cook County,
Illinois, County Department, Chancery Division, do, for
themselves and for their subsidiaries, successors, assigns,
officers, directors, agents and any parties subject to their
control, the following:
Fri d
and Beneficiary, their present and former directors, officers,
agents, employees, successors and assigns, and each of them,
separately and collectively, from all claims, causes of action,
suits, debts, agreements, damages, and demands whatsoever, known
or unknown, in law, in admiralty, or in equity, which either ever
had, now has, or which either shall or may have, against any of
them, separately or collectively, from the beginning of the world
to the date of this document, except for those claims which
relate to enforcement of the Settlement Agreement.
Z. Village and Corporate Authorities Covenant that neither
will commence, aid or participate in any way, prosecute or cause
or permit to be commenced or prosecuted against Owner and
Beneficiary and either's present or former directors, officers,
agents, employees, successors and assigns or any of them,
separately or collectively, any action or other proceeding based
on any claim, demand, cause of action, Obligation, damages or
liability which is the subject of this Mutual Release.
3. Village and Corporate Authorities warrant that neither
has sold, assigned, transferred, conveyed, or otherwise disposed
of any claim, demand, cause of action, obligation, damage or
liability covered by this Mutual Release.
4. Owner and Beneficiary hereby release Village and
Corporate Authorities, their present and former directors,
Officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns', and each of
them, separately and Collectively, from all claims, causes of
2
action, suits, debts, agreements, damages, and demands
whatsoever, known or unknown, in law, in admiralty, or in equity,
which either ever had, now has, or which either shall or may
have, against any of them, separately or collectively, from the
beginning of the world to the date of this document, except for
those claims which relate to enforcement of the Settlement
Agreement.
S. Owner and Beneficiary Covenant that neither will
commence, aid or participate in any way, prosecute or cause or
permit to be commenced or prosecuted against Village or Corporate
Authorities and either's present or former directors, officers,
agents, employees, successors and assigns or any of them,
separately or collectively, any action or other proceeding based
on any claim, demand, cause of action, obligation, damages or
liability which is the subject of this Mutual Release.
6. Owner and Beneficiary warrant that neither has sold,
assigned, transferred, conveyed, or otherwise disposed of any
claim, demand, cause of action, obligation, damage or liability
covered by this Mutual Release.
7. This document embodies the entire terms and conditions
of the Mutual Release described herein. All words, phrases,
sentences and paragraphs, including the recitals hereto, are
material to the execution hereof.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OR I
By A10
040.0000.?
f 11 P.esi e
3 -
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Be;Q verl I"rus t Co. as Successor 'Trustee to
,
LY BANK, as Trustee Under
Trust Agreement Dated September 10,
1968 and known as Trust No. 8-1551
A
By
ATTEST: Asst ce resi ent
-Frust Officer
ATTEST*
COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC., an
Illinois corporation
Bil
4-
A14H02500ABO91191
ETI'LEMENT AG'REEME'NT
THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into on
this 3rd day of September, 1991, by and between the VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS (hereinafter referred to as the
"Village"), by and through its Village President and the members
Of its Village Board of Trustees (hereinafter referred to
collectively as the "Corporate Authorities"), on the one hand, and
BEVERLY BANK, AS TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 10,
1968 AND KNOWN AS TRUST NUMBER 8-1551 (hereinafter referred to as
the "Owner"), and COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC., an Illinois
corporation (hereinafter referred to as the "Beneficiary"), on the
other hand.
WHEREAS, the Village, a municipal corporation, organized under
the laws of the State of Illinois, is a home rule unit as defined
under the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and
WHEREAS, the Village has the power, under its ordinances, to
enter into a settlement agreement such as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of record of a parcel of real
estate (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"), which
real estate was contiguous to the corporate limits of the Village,
which real estate is commonly known as 3040 South Busse Road,
Arlington Heights, Illinois, and which real estate is legally
described as follows:
The North five acres (except the West 210 feet) of the
South 25 acres of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast
quarter of Section 22, Township 41 North, Range 11, East
of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Beneficiary is the beneficiary of the trust which
is the Owner of the Subject Property.; and
WHEREAS, previously on March 3, 1987 and on August 4, 1987,
the Corporate Authorities of the Village passed ordinances
involuntarily annexing the Subject Property into the Village; and
WHEREAS, on April 8, 1987, the Beneficiary filed a Complaint
for Declaratory Judgment, Injunction, Mandamus and Quo Warranto
Relief against the Village, the Corporate Authorities, and others
in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department,
Chancery Division, which was assigned case number 87 CH 3393; and
WHEREAS, the Village and Corporate Authorities have generally
denied the allegations contained in case number 87 CH 3393; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 1988, the Owner and others filed a First
Amended Complaint in another action seeking inter alia, a
disconnection from the village and other relief in the Circuit
Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department, Chancery
Division, which was assigned case number 87 CH 5503; and
WHEREAS, the Village and Corporate Authorities have generally
denied the allegations contained in case number 87 CH 5503; and
WHEREAS, case number 87 CH 5503 is currently pending in the
Appellate Court of Illinois as number 90-3699; and
- 2 -
WHEREAS, both the Village and Corporate Authorities, on the
one hand, and the Owner and Beneficiary, on the other hand, wish
to avoid the delay and expense of protracted litigation and to
resolve amicably all matters and issues actually or potentially in
controversy between them relating to case numbers 87 CH 3393 and
87 CH 5503.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
including, but not limited to, the covenants and agreements
hereinafter set forth, the undersigned parties agree as follows:
1. Each party represents that it has full authority and
obtained the necessary approval to enter into and perform this
Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions.
2. The Owner, prior to execution of this Agreement, will
file with the Village Clerk, a proper petition conditioned on the
terms and provisions of this Agreement, to rezone the Subject
Property from the R -X Single Family Residence District to the R-4
Residential Development District pursuant to the Village Zoning
Ordinance.
3. The village and Corporate Authorities represent that
prior to the execution of this Agreement, all appropriate public
notices have been made and public hearings held on the provisions
of this Agreement by the requisite hearing bodies of the Village
and those bodies have forwarded their findings and recommendations
to the Corporate Authorities.
4. Immediately after the Public hearings described in
Paragraph 3 and after the execution of this Agreement, the
Corporate Authorities shall cause to be adopted an amendment to the
Zoning Map of the Village Code of mount Prospect, Illinois, zoning
and classifying the Subject Property, in the R-4 Residential
Development District.
S. Upon f-xf-ni , f- i nT%
Authorities shall sign a Consent to Permanent Injunction
("Consent") in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Such Consent
shall, among other things:
a. Permit the Court in case number 87 CH 3393 to enter
a permanent injunction against the Village and
Corporate Authorities prohibiting them from
interfering with the Owner and Beneficiary's and
their successors' and assigns' right to erect,
construct or maintain a garage building for storage
of motor vehicles, a parking lot, and a residence
on the Subject Property (as modified by the
provisions of this Agreement which shall be
incorporated therein);
b. Not require the Court to make any findings against
the Village and Corporate Authorities or in favor
of the Owner and Beneficiary;
C. Provide that each party shall bear its own costs in
case number 87 CH 3393; and
d. Otherwise provide for the dismissal with prejudice
of case number 87 CH 3393, subject to the Court's
retaining jurisdiction to enforce the permanent
injunction.
- 4 -
6. The parties further agree that the Consent shall be
construed by the parties to also permit the following use of the
Subject Property and any present and future improvements thereon,
for the erection, construction, and maintenance of a garage
building with offices, day-care or nursery facilities, a vehicle
washing facility, and for parking, service and maintenance of motor
vehicles (as defined by Section 1-146) of the Illinois Vehicle Code
(Chapter 95-1/2, Illinois Revised Statutes, 1989), provided that
the uses and construction of improvements in connection therewith
shall be limited by the following:
a. A day-care or nursery facility must comply with any
and all applicable state and county codes, rules and
regulations, and the plans for said facility are in
accordance with the plans previously submitted to
the Village by the owner and approved by the
Village;
b. A vehicle wash to be provided for said facility must
be in compliance with any applicable federal and/or
state codes and be in accordance with the plans
previously submitted to the Village by the Owner and
approved by the village; and
C. Parking, vehicle washing, service and maintenance
of motor vehicles must be limited to the Owner's or
its successors' or assigns' fleet service
operations; provided, however, that this shall
expressly not include the following: a drop-off or
distribution center for the delivery or pick-up of
goods not used in the Owner's or its successors' or
assigns' trade or business; cartage services with
loads in excess of 32,000 pounds; and motor vehicles
of tractor/semi-trailer type.
7. The Village represents the Metropolitan Water Reclamation
District sanitary sewers to serve the Subject Property in
- 5 -
accordance with the uses permitted under the terms of this
Agreement are located along the west side of South Busse Road. The
Village further represents that a municipal water main to serve the
Subject Property is presently located along the west side of South
Busse Road. The Village agrees that the Owner, its successors and
assigns may, for the Purpose of serving the Subject Property,
connect on to such municipal facilities, and Owner agrees to
connect to the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District sanitary
sewers, under the following terms and conditions:
a. The Owner will pay an application fee and footage
charges, if any, in the amounts established under
the then current procedures of the Metropolitan
Water Reclamation District;
b. The Owner shall grant the Village a twenty foot
easement located at the rear of the Subject Property
for the purpose of the Village installing a 12 inch
class 56 water main and fire hydrant to loop the
municipal water system (the Owner and Village shall
agree to equally share the costs of this
installation);
C. The Owner shall extend at its cost water mains on
itsd property to connect to the municipal water main;
an
d. The Owner will pay all tap -on fees, water meter
rental fees, connection fees, and water consumption
'and sewer usage fees for water and sewers and at the
rates established at the date hereof and from time
to time as may be amended by the ordinances of the
Village, or by the Metropolitan Water Reclamation
District, as is appropriate.
8. The village will not require the Owner to install any
fire hydrants on the interior of the Subject Property, except that
automatic sprinkler equipment approved by the Village shall be
- 6 -
installed and maintained in the proposed day-care or nursery
facility; provided, further, that if there is any future
intensification of the uses of the Subject Property, including but
not limited to, by remodeling, expansion or construction of new
structures (other than the day-care or nursery facility and vehicle
wash), then the Owner shall install and maintain fire hydrants on
the Subject Property in accordance with the Fire Prevention Code
of the Village.
9. The Village will not require the owner to pave any
additional portions of the Subject Property except as follows:
a. The Owner shall maintain and repair existing paved
surfaces to a reasonably smooth and usable standard;
and
b. As provided in the expansion plans as presented by
Owner and approved by the Village for a vehicle
wash.
10. The Owner shall landscape the Subject Property as shown
on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Owner shall have the
responsibility to maintain and, if required, replace said
landscaping.
11. The Village agrees not to impose any additional
requirements or regulations on the existing underground storage
tanks on the Subject Property in addition to those required from
time to time by other governmental bodies or agencies. The Owner
represents that said underground storage tanks are presently in and
will be maintained in compliance with state and federal laws and
such regulations as may be Promulgated from time to time by
governmental bodies or agencies having jurisdiction in such
matters.
12. The Village will not require the Owner to record a plat
of subdivision of the Subject Property.
13. Immediately after the passage of the ordinance rezoning
the Subject Property, the Corporate Authorities shall cause to be
adopted an amendment to Chapter 17 "Vehicle Licenses" of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, establishing a uniform
license fee for all school buses of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per bus.
The Corporate Authorities shall reserve the right to amend this
amount from time to time as conditions warrant, provided that no
amendment shall be effective until May 1, 1995.
14. The Village agrees that the height and design of the
perimeter fences surrounding the Subject Property as they exist as
of the date of this Agreement are acceptable and shall not require
any variances to be obtained.
15. All provisions, conditions, and regulations set forth in
this Agreement and the Exhibits to which it refers supersede all
Village ordinances, codes and regulations to the extent of any
conflict therewith and as they may apply to the Subject Property.
In all other instances, the Village ordinances, codes and
regulations shall apply and control.
16. This Agreement shall be binding upon and for the benefit
of the parties hereto, their respective grantees, successors and
assigns.
17. Upon a breach of this Agreement, any of the parties in
any court of competent Jurisdiction, by any action or proceeding
at law or in equity, may secure the specific performance of the
covenants and agreements herein contained, may be awarded damages
for failure of performance or both, or may obtain rescission and
disconnection for repudiation or material failure of performance.
Before any failure of any party to this Agreement to perform its
obligations under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a breach of
this Agreement, the party claiming such failure shall notify, in
writing, the party alleged to have failed to perform the alleged
failure and shall demand performance. two breach of this Agreement
may be found to have occurred if performance has commenced to the
satisfaction of the complaining party within twenty-one (21) days
of the receipt of such notice. In the absence of any breach by the
Village, the Owner waives its right to seek disconnection from the
Village.
18. The parties agree that this Agreement and any Exhibits
attached hereto may be amended only by mutual consent of the
parties, by the adoption of an ordinance or resolution of the
Village approving said amendment, as provided by law, and the
execution of said amendment by the parties or their successors in
interest.
- 9 -
19. Immediately after the passage of the ordinance rezoning
the Subject Property and the entry of the Consent, the Parties
shall stipulate to and dismiss with prejudice as to each other
(each party to bear its own costs) the lawsuits captioned Cook
Ciomn:v Schrici Rim- Tnc v o No. 87 CH 3393,
except for the Court's retaining jurisdiction to enforce the
permanent injunction, and it Na i n 1 B nkof Mount Prospect,
11ted December 22 1977 Rn wn
Tru No LT -1 94et-,Al, v. villa le of Mount
1-61 Ot NQUU-R—rosioect. et al,,
87 CH 5503 now pending in the Appellate Court of Illinois as number
90-3699, and sign a mutual release in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit C.
20. Except as hereinafter expressly provided, this Agreement
supersedes all prior agreement, negotiations and exhibits and is
a full integration of the entire agreement of the parties.
21. If any provision, covenant, agreement or portion of this
Agreement or its application to any person, entity or property is
held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the application or
validity of any other provisions, covenants or portions of this
Agreement and to that end, any such invalid provision, covenant,
agreement or portion of this Agreement is declared to be severable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporate Authorities and the Owner
and Beneficiary have hereunto set their hands and seals, and have
caused this instrument to be executed by their duly authorized
- 10 -
officials and the corporate seal affixed hereto, all on the day and
year first above written.
ATTEST:
o
ust
IA
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Beverly Trust Co. as Successor Trustee to
BEVERLY BANK, as Trustee Under
Trust Agreement Dated September 10,
1968 and known' as Trust No. 8-1551
BY
COOK COUNTY SCHOOL LOS, INC., an
Illinois corporation
ATTES Bpi
This
PIS zS
e C u
held P
of this
CAF/
4/29/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SPECIFIED
PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNTPROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate
authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no longer
necessary or useful to or in the best interests of the Village of
Mount Prospect to retain ownership of the personal property listed
hereinbelow; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the best interests
of the Village would be served by selling said personal property
at a public auction to be conducted by the Mount Prospect Police
Department on Saturday, May 16, 1992.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois
Municipal Code, Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter 24, Section 11-
76-4, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect find that the personal property listed herein owned by the
Village of Mount Prospect is no longer necessary or useful to said
Village and the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect
will be served by its sale.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorize the sale of the personal
property owned by the Village of Mount Prospect through auction
conducted by the Mount Prospect Police Department at 11 South Pine
Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois on Saturday, May 16, 1992, a copy
of said personal property is attached hereto and hereby made a made
hereof as Exhibit "A"
SECTION THREE: That the Mount Prospect Police Department is hereby
authorized to sell by auction to the highest bidder the personal
property owned by the Village of Mount Prospect as listed in
Exhibit "A" hereto as well as abandoned and confiscated property
in the possession of the Mount Prospect Police Department.
SECTION FOUR: That upon receipt of full payment for the item, the
Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to convey and
transfer title to the aforesaid personal property to the successful
bidder.
SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
w4*4
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
, 1992.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
EXHIBIT "All
Microfilm reader printer 3M 600 model 260AG Serial #166057
IBM Selectric II typewriter Serial #2702801
IBM Selectric II typewriter Serial #1207067
One (1) wood desk 60 x 30, broken leg
One Bunn coffee maker, serial #18055 (non functional)
Two (2) operable VHS video payers, approximately 12 years old.
Two hour speed. Serial #B3HK00182 and #B3HK00096
One (1) black IMB Selectric typewriter Serial #00362 -
inoperable
One (1) IBM Model 8T - inoperable
One (1) Schwinn exercise bike, DM 582818, needs repair
One generator, signal corps PE770, 115 volts DC, Model 70,
Serial #3876
One (1) wood storage cabinet
One (1) 5 drawer file cabinet
Two (2) roller desk chairs
Two (2) hare traction splints, Serial #1109
Four (4) Ferno ambulance cots, Serial #F87081 and #F47001
One (1) RCA Black & White television, Model AR158UR -
inoperable
One (1) Zenith Chromacolor, Serial 608L075 - inoperable
Two (2) one piece set suits
One (1) Clark mode 609 Wet Dry Shop Vac, Serial #6089143304,
disassembled - inoperable
Mount Prospect Public Works Department V
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM MY LISA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: April 30, 1992
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results
Two 35000 GVWR Truck Cabs and Chassis
On April 29, 1992, sealed bids were opened for the proposed
purchase of two replacement 35,000 GVWR truck cabs and chassis.
We advertised this bid in the local newspaper as required, plus
we sent out a total of 13 invitational bids to four Internation-
al dealerships, 7 Ford dealerships and 2 GMC dealerships. The
specifications were broad enough so Ford and GMC could have
submitted competitive bids if they chose to. However, only one
bid was received:
Freund International
Two 1993 Model 4900 International Cabs and Chassis.
Total Bid Price $75,564.00
Delivery 60 - 90 days
A year ago, we had an identical bid sent out for a replacement
truck, and we sent out seven invitational bids and received four
responses. Bid price variance from a year ago is approximately
$700 per unit.
In the 1992-93 budget, there is $60,000 allocated for each of
the replacement dump trucks under account codes.48-077-8455 and
48-077-8456. To be bid at a later date are the hydraulic sys-
tems and dump bodies for each unit, along with tailgate salt
spreaders. We will also be purchasing steel for plow frames and
bumpers and lighting systems for the dump bodies.
I recommend acceptance of the bid as submitted by Freund interna-
tional at $37,782 for each of the two 1993 Model 4900 Interna-
tional cabs and chassis, for a total contract award of $75,564.
These units meet or exceed our specifications.
After bid award, we project that our mechanics will have these
units outfitted with hydraulics, plow frames, and bodies by
January 1993. The two trucks we are replacing are both 1981
International trucks with the following history:
Village I.D. Nos.
Odometer Readings
Hour Meter Readings
Adjusted Mileage
40 MPH x No. Hrs.
Current Maintenance Costs
4518
31,586
3,002 hrs.
120,080
$12,975
4550
34,904
3,363 hrs.
134,520
$13,441
As I stated at the budget hearings, our type of use places a
strain on the vehicles, especially when plowing snow. As a
result, odometer mileage readings are usually not good indica.-
tors of the condition of the trucks.
Both units need the dump body sub -frames replaced at an estimat-
ed cost of $4000 each, plus repair and repainting of the cabs at
an estimated cost of $2500 each. The two replacement units are
not being offered as trade-ins, but will be sold. at the first
available NWMC public auction after the two new units are placed
in service.
HLW/td
35000GVW.RES/FILES/BIDS
Village of Mount Prospec
Mount Prospect, Illinois I
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
F1
TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 30, 1992
SUBJECT: CRACK SEALING BID
Northwest Municipal Conference went out for bids for crack sealing. We have a total
amount of $34,000 in two separate accounts available for crack sealing. This method is
utilized in order to extend the length of time between full resurfacing of streets and is
very beneficial from a cost benefit analysis for extension of road surfaces.
The $1.34 per pound is very comparable to prices in the past. In 1990, we paid $1.03.
In 1991, we paid $1.023.
I recommend the acceptance of the contract with Behm Pavement Maintenance for a cost
not to exceed $34,000.
JOHN FULTON IRON
JFD/rcc
attachment
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
ME CnV CSA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Street Superintendent
DATE: May 24, 1992
SUBJECT: Results of Crack Sealing Bid
Attached is a memo from the Northwest Municipal Conference indi-
cating the results of the bid opening for the 1992 crack sealing
program. In order to proceed with the Village's portion of the
contract, Village Board approval is required. This project will
be funded with monies from Account #01-071-04-6149, which cur-
rently has $30,000 (Page 139) and Account #01-071-11-6255 $4,000
(page 146).
Based on the Northwest Municipal Conference's recommendations, I
recommend that the Village Board accept the crack sealing propos-
al as submitted by Behm Pavement Maintenance up to the maximum
of $34,000 as mentioned above.
Mel,06th
Street Superintendent
I concur with the above recommendation.
Herbert L. Weeks
Director Public Works
CRCKSLNG.92/FILES/BIDS
MB/eh
Batn , PUD-Lic Wor'Ks
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 W. Central Road
Ar 14c'.mt Prospect, IL 60056
4 -
NWM440
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
1616 E GOLF
ROAD A REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS
DES PLAINES,
IL 60016 MUNICIPALITIES AND TOWNSHIPS
(708) 296-92DO FAX 296-9207 REPRESENTING A POPULATION OF OVER ONE MILLJOr,'
FOUNDED IN 1958
TO: _Zkrtijcipants in the 1992 Crack Sealing Program
FROM:
.
Paul TTcLaughliX, Administrative Assistant
6 "'we V'11age
Evanston
Gencae
C"Ienoew
RE: Bid Results
Hanover Park
H,grOand Park
DATE: April 20, 1992
Hoffnvn EWmes
..are Foresq
-��"'ezur'ch
.- s;Qnywfle
Below is a summary of bids received for the 1992 Crack
nroin.00d
Sealing Program.
klormrl Grove
Mc'urt P'ospect
Niles
Although R & E Midwest Sales Company of Herrin Illinois
Norvibrook
had the lowest prices, they withdrew their bid before it
Norrhfiod
was officially awarded. The next lowest bidder was Behm
Palanne
ParkF7;dae
Pavement Maintenance who was granted the bid at a base
pmsnest He'ghts
price of $1.034/lb. You can calculate the number of feet
Raling Meadows
of crack sealing you can expect to be sealed by completing
Rosefle
S1,�1ZIUMbrxg
the following formula.
Skokie
If you require routing:
,wr,or,revs s
Nhe6lng
VVjjrTjP'tte
# of feet of = $ you $ 1.034
Winnetka
crack sealed have available t $/lb. of sealant
k Grove Twp
Maine w
7�,e,rTr.).p,
X 4 feet sealed with one lb. sealant)
%C,Tfifield `wp
Wheehng'Twp,
If you do not require routing:
OFFICERS
of feet of= you $ 1.034
P,ps,dent
Sonya A Crawshaw
crack sealed have available $/lb. of sealant
Hanover Park
X 6 feet sealed with one 1b. sealant)
V,ce-President
Joan W Barr
Evanston
The cost of sealant for arterial level streets and on
streets where the contractor is required to blow routed
S,errerary- �'easufof
material to the curb before applying new sealant will cost
Wil harn A Sommer
Ln(Vnwood
$1.134/lb.
F�ecuv'e 0'rector
Rim A Alhas
Behm Pavement will be contacting communities and will
explain the order and estimation of how long the work will
take for the various towns. Shortly a contract between
Behm Pavement and your jurisdiction will be mailed.
Please have your Board/Council approve the contract and
return the original to the NWMC office.
Bid Summary:
# of lbs
Company
#lb.
of sealant
Total Value
Behm Pavement
$1.034
319,633
$ 330,500
R & E Midwest
.9332
354,175
330,500
S.K. C.
1.042
317,178
330,500
M -W4 MtOUNT PROSPECT
P,4 trIUSTORICAL S;OCIET°Y
P.O. Box 81 - 1100 Linneman Road - Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
$Iku" Telephone: (708) 956-6777
TO: HONORABLE MAYOR -k TRUSTEES
FROM: THE MOUNT PROSPECT <
HISTORICAL SOCIETY
DATE: MAY 1, 1992
SUBJECT: PLASTERING CONTRACT FOR
101 S. MAPLE STREET
Society House Superintendent Walter ftutkowski states that
three bids have been received for the plaster work to be
done on the village owned property at 101 S. Maple Street
being restored by the Mount Prospect Historical Society.
Mohawk Plastering Co.
107 Mohawk Drive
North Barrington, IL 60010 .............$17,935
Bob Jirasek
Plastering 5: Tile, Inc.
23153 Grand Avenue
Lake Zurich, IL 60047 ..................$ 6,275
Ken Koeppen Plastering
1040 Linneman Rd.
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 ...............$ 4,559
The low bid should be accepted not only because of the cost
but also because this is a local contractor interested in
the restoration and one who has a good reputation in the
Village.
The bid was accepted by the Historical Society Board of
Directors on April,13, 1992.
Funds are available from the Yount Prospect Historical
Society Restoration Fund per David Jepson.
Dedicated to the discovery, preservation and dissemination of knowledge about the history
of Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Winner of 1989 Governor's Hometown Award and Certificate of Excellence
Congress of Illinois Historical Societies & Museums
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
T= aTY L!M
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager c: Chuck Bencic
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: April 29, 1992
SUBJECT: Construction Engineering Services
Can-Dota/Wa-Pella/Central Storm Sewer
In conjunction with the directive by the Village Board, I again
put out a request for proposals for construction engineering
services for the forthcoming storm sewer improvement project
labelled Can-Dota/Wa-Pella/Central Storm Sewer. The following'
five firms were sent invitational bids:
1) Camp Dresser McKee
2) 'HDR Engineering Inc.
3) Harza Environmental Services Inc,.
4) RJN Environmental Associates Inc.
5) SEC Donohue
Camp Dresser McKee submitted a letter regretting that it was
their decision not to submit a proposal at this time due to
conflicts with availability of proper staff.
HDR Engineering also submitted a letter indicating that they
would not be submitting a proposal at this time.
Harza Environmental Services contacted me the last week in April
and verbally informed me that, because of commitments on other
ongoing projects, they would not be able to provide services. of
this nature at this time.
Responses were received from our design engineer, RJN Environmen-
tal Associates, and from SEC Donohue. Their proposals are thus:
SEC Donohue projected labor 1818 hours; fee not to exceed
$130,000
RJN Environmental Associates projected labor 2052 hours;
fee not to exceed $145,541
The design of this storm sewer project was completed by RJN
Environmental Associates. In most cases, it is preferable to
award a construction engineering services contract to the design
engineer under the assumption that they have more familiarity
with the project and design. However, in our RFPs, I attempted
to cover all aspects of the project so that a competitive bid
could be received and a competent firm would have the means to
give the community an alternative for this segment of the storm
water project.
After reviewing both proposals, it is my recommendation to award
the low bid as submitted by SEC Donohue in an amount not to
exceed $130,000. The bid opening for the storm sewer project is
scheduled for May 12, 1992. As part of this proposal, if ap-
proved, SEC Donohue will be representing the Village on review
of bids and recommendation for award. They will then follow
through with all other aspects; i.e., preliminary
preconstruction meetings, materials testing, and staking.
��'�KQJ�
Ifirbert, L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
CDOTAPRO. MEM /FILES/SEWERS
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= an USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: April 16, 1992
SUBJECT: Engineering Design Fees
for Senior Center Building
For over a year, the staff at the Senior Center have been re-
questing additional office space. Several alternatives have
been reviewed and, in the final analysis, it was felt that the
best way would be to build a one-story addition in the northwest
corner of the existing building, taking up most of the space
where the landscaped garden is located. Some space could be
obtained on the second floor, but would involve temporarily
relocating the Communi-cations.Division and remodeling the entire
space. The cost for that opt -ion would be prohibitive, and they
still wouldn't have all their space needs met. Another option,
was to take away some space from the seniors' activity areas,
but that also wasn't feasible.
What we are recommending is solving the long-term space needs of
the center with a proposed 401x501 addition. I have sought
proposals from three architectural firms for design work on this
project:
Archiplan International Ltd. - $7500
Donohue - 7930
Kurtz Associates Architects - 9100
The design contract proposal would include:
a. Preliminary planning
b. Schematic design documents_
C. Construction documents
d. Specifications and final plans for bidding
e. Estimated construction costs
Until we have actual bidding documents available, it would not
be possible to provide anyone with accurate construction esti-
mates. Part of the architect's charge will be for design of the
project to meet all codes or for advising us on what variances,
if any, would be required.
Once all documents are approved and a cost estimate is received,
a determination can be made to continue with bidding. If the
project is bid, the contractor would only construct the outer
walls and roof. As a cost savings measure, Public Works person-
nel would erect all interior walls, electrical, including
lights, and subcontract HVAC system and floor treatment work.
If landscaping is required, we would purchase the plant material
and do the planting. We may need to install.a fire sprinkle
system into the entire center. If required, it would cost an
additional $650 for designing the system to serve the whole
building. I would expect Public Works personnel would bring the
water line into the building and subcontract out the interior
piping. If funds were not available to pipe the entire build-
ing, my recommendation would be to install sprinklers in the new
addition only and phase in the other areas over the next two
years. Additional design fees would be required for the remain-
der of the building sprinkler system.
I recommend waiver of a formal bidding procedure for design
services and award the contract to Archiplan International Ltd.
for $7500. This firm has done work for the Village in the past,
and everything was satisfactory.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
SR-CTRDE.SGN/FILES/BUILDTNG
6
IVA 6 i kt_j
1
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
TM Crn tSA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager c: Dave Jepson
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: April 24, 1992
SUBJECT: Emergency Sewer Repair, 202 S. Owen
On April 21, 1992, the Village Board acted on an emergency re-
quest for repair to a main line sewer in front of 202 S. Owen
Street. It was estimated that this sewer repair would be approx-
imately $15,000. However, any contractor who works on an emer-
gency repair of this nature can only speculate on the projected
cost of repair. Rossetti Contractors made that clear on their
proposal, which was based on a spot repair of a sewer approxi-
mately 201 deep.
Once they got down to the bottom, they had to put in approximate-
ly 30' of pipe due to deteriorated and broken 2411 sewer. In
fact, to even make a connection, they had to insert a liner into
the pipe to maintain the structural integrity of the pipe.
Because of the extra pipe plus making a "Y" connection for two
homes and the extra excavation and backfill, the cost for the
pipe repair is $18,987.68. In addition, there is a not -to -ex-
ceed figure of $2500 for replacement of a concrete driveway and
several squares of sidewalk.
I have made the commitment that the resodding of the parkway in
front of 202 and 204 S. Owen will be made either with Village
forces or by a landscape contractor working for the Village. Ac-
cordingly, this emergency repair not -to -exceed figure is
$21,487.68.
HLW/td
2025—OWE.N/FILES/SEWERS
Herbert L. Weeks
ROSSETTI BRAS,
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
r' 1 1 7 59
To V, 11At4E 6P &4
I loo w, 6WIX41-
/1/,, Pxc,5er " -J'-"
zfiw Ale W-6
I 6-r4 C711114-6
,44-9,e 7o z �5.
wook if,,AI41AI-i
jlo�'31"4 Wt
lwel4rel'le 4N'V4
FORM180-2
I V-ju (81)
LETTER
Date / 4/g
Subject
Z Z S, 01AJ4-^J
lqr- Plz�e 24,
13 e'wx /0�r
OA/
A,16 -51z6Ww-k'
69�,57-
-14
7�5 ✓
IV,,r
IV41
El Please reply E) No reply necessary
SIGNED
T
-C'l ION CO., 114C.
2'37 MELVuN DRIVS
%K) R,0C K, i LUIN, OiS WV2
No. 157 Rev, (Partial )
Date April 22,1992
Your
Order No.
Sold To VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Shipped to Sanitary Sewer Repair
■ 1.700 W Central Road ■ 202 Owen St.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-3266 Mount Prospect,Illinois
ATTN: Mr. Herb Weeks
Our Order No, Salesman TermsF.O.B. Shipped Shipped Via
Cash
. . ........ du .. —duant–ity'"'", Stock Num b . er/Description Unit Price Unit Amount
Ordered Shipped
To Invoice for work completed to
Date at above location. Balance of Work to
be Completed & Invoiced at later date.
S U M M A R Y
(PER ATTACHED DETAIL SHEETS)
April 16 1992 $ 2,164 11 A,$ 2,16411
April 17,1992 5,667 85 EA. 1 5,667
85
Apr' 12 " 1992 7,885 91 EA. 7,885
91
April21,1992 3,269 81 ^A. 3,269
81
TOTAL AMOUNT DUE THIS INVOICE $18,987'68
--- -------
tilson Jones Company /invoice
86
nv 7;7C.I i I L)(IUJ.
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC, G�.> -Z_ _ G PH. 706-5590223
T & M
DAILY TIME and MATERIAL or RENTAL REPORT CONT- ❑
DATEN /C
.l []
� ��._G�-'.�.�.��..._.____.,._._.__. �.,.
INVOICE T0:
STREET 1) o .ti s" cam- r e/ JOB NO. M 1
CITY, Caa c+
ATTN:
LOCATION
� � G ' Gr..a�.-;� r
DESCRIPTION OF WORK; /•.✓f�d
_ c." Y -w-- /�r.)c..,� •y✓c.,. .. ,c +�i� Za.r:` <, r'°"�>
LABOR
EQUIPMENT (MOVE IN Z OUT 0 NONE 0 )
CLASSIFICATION.
ST
OT
DT "`* RATE INSUR,Hre AYROr�
AMO
DESCRIPTION
HRS.
RATE
AMOUN
OP.' C. t, -,ern ' ;'✓ 1
Y��� �I.6 b`f'.95ql.`t�
�ca_a ,(/
�
�..z]
),;, ��
T.,D,
P L.
LA0.
L
c 1/1* 1P.3f ,.ff o5" 96 31(
LS
I I
3f ro
LA0.
Jtlw 18.E-i.ff,bS S,)
LA0. i� 11c
L
t I� F eo J.4a 9 Y.Jn
C�G
8a
2 3. J'.
LAB.
0
LAB,
"t'Ac8". �FPTM•.... �R..
b
SUB,TOTA,L"LABOR $ 1-I, -x`17 $ 83 .,Y1
H.W. & P. FUND ^LABORER HOURS O •3� `% f3. o
H.W, & P. FUND • OPERATOR b HOURS @
kW, & P, FUND • 1 A ik HOURS @'^Y',' ^
SUB TOTAL LABOR $
PLUS. 31r °% OF' $
PLUS WORKMENS COMP, INS, 'l f) Ile, %OF $ rI6,r* Nr3L 1 1
PUBLIC LIABILITY & PROPERTY DAMAGE INS,
EXCLUDING PAYROLL OF DRIVERS 1 ., C,%OF $ 4M, f" T'I • D
FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT TAX O,go % $ b#
STATE UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 1, -10 %OF $ x` ),,M J'] , J`,
FEOERAL SOCIAL SECURITY TAX -),6r% OF $ 83.)4) 163,171
TOTAL PAYROLL ADDITIVES
PLUS. J„ '%OFS d1?^=.1�es
_�__..........M
_
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $t�'n
TOTAL LABOR $
LABOR $ f) g' �) SUB TOTAL MATERIAL
j
% TAX
EQUIPMENT T / PLUS -% OF $ _
MATERIAL,"
ATERIAL ✓ TOTAL MATERIAL $� Ho�k-
TOTAL BILL $
hoobt l I I OK06. ,,. .- ]H, 708-559 0223
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. l�°'�
DAILY TIME and MATERIAL or RENTAL REPORT T:
coNT-r, rma
-
✓' ,J "i/�,c _ DATE /%``�2 =__ N/C
INVOICE T0: �'
STREET r JOB N0, • �a _
CITY LOCATIONZ
ATfN:
DE
SCR! TION OF WORK: o. v ,a._.. /j�! r
LABOR
EQUIPMENT (MOVE IN ❑ OUT
Q NONE ❑ )
CIASSIFICATIpN
ST
4T DT WAS. RATE NAMOUNTC AMOUN
DESCRIPTION
HRS.
RATE
AMOUNT
OP. o_
�t_ 8�1l z 10 8,1a ia{ Lf
7-
03
x /iJi r
tIJ"
3d; r,
T.D.
td
/ 246-1.0
T.D. N m n..>
I�✓ ,>C 1b�,3a 11 6
O c�-%,.._
Ld �,
PL.
LAB. +/•Jo 'z
J� F 18, 3 I1 _ 104, J la
LAB. ,L .,,,,,,
't
LAB, r✓+
�. BjIV9O kf3, If ,Sp
dS'
b1.
LAB,
�#a�r R.
FAM H4.,
a'
3 So,oa (ra,00 IJ 0.pl
/ QI)✓ -L-3"),r 1.,1�,) 1t ,b
/< / cH tStax
/0. 01,
0o
SUB TOTAL LABOR
H.W: & P. FUND - LABORER 3±111 HOURS @ .( � f
H. W: & P. FUND -OPERATOR \ 1 HOURS @
H.W. & P. FUND --Tf, • ci HOURS @ `h 0
SUB TOTAL, LABOR $ 16
PLUS f % OF $IrT -rl"
ac aq
Z4
,PLUS WORKMENSCOMP. INS. 'LO .310 %OF$ iib •1y z .bi
PUBLIC LIABILITY & PROPERTY DAMAGE INS,
EXCLUDING PAYROLL OF DRIVERS )%3° % $ Its, f 183, b6
FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT TAX 0.$0 %OF $
ST ATE UNEMPLOYMENT TAX �,,�rl' % OF: $ NN,f*
FEDERAL SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ),. r %OF$ 1111f;St O3,tL
TOTAL PAYROLL ADOITIVES 6) Vi
PLUS OF$0,
_
�.
_ _ _
_,..._
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $
TOTAL LABOR $ 9ooq,�0
hAAT'COIAI C
DESCRIPTION
OTY-.
UNIT
COST AMOUNT DESCRIPTION OTY,
UNIT COST AMOUNT
4r, 72; 1'0
7-
x /iJi r
tIJ"
lo- gL
td
/ 246-1.0
LABOR $ 3 00`S. tb
EQUIPMENT, ��_�,
MATERIAL
TOTAL BILL, - $ -:b 'l , 9 f
SUB TOTAL MATERIAL
% TAX r
PLUS_ if--% OF $
TOTAL MATERIAL $. _
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. j PH 708-559-0223
T..... . — -----
T &
DAILY TIME and MATERIAL or RENTAL REPORT CONT. C]
DATE 2 cl
JNVOICE TO:
CITY
STRE
'ATTN: ET
JOB NO,
LOCATION _Ice
DES RIP' OF WORK: C:"iv
LABOR
EQUIPMENT (MOVE IN 0 OUT 0 NONE K)
CLASSIFICATION '- 0 1
ST
DT YOTAL 11 AAMCK PAYROLL
RATE 'Nsu
MRS. AMOVMT AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
HRS.
RATE
AMOUNT
COST
Lff 0 _
ICaZR
-LfV' ff
SA
4`3 --.31
-SE3
".(F pili
/7
14-94
Y-11 3
0
V c
PL,
V' eo
-A-oj�
LAS.
t. -rf
o
LAB.
LAB.
fL47>lc' 3
f0,00 /J -D, 00 /!p,o0
FRM
)f -
SUB TOTAL LABOR $ Ar)(-. Lt( $ z& 1-
H.W. & P. FUND - LABORER HOURS@
0
Yo. 06
HIK & P. FUND - OPERATOR 1 JL HOURS @
H.W. & P. FUND -TI-A), HOURS@ YO"
SUB TOTAL LABOR $ -a'2o6•
PLUS, 31, % OF s V%%06• )f
Ila
-o
_Z2. —p
PLUS WORKMENS COMP,. INS, 1-o,31- %OF$ 4,rPEl 3,f&. 6 7
PUBLIC LIABILITY & PROPERTY DAMAGE INS.
EXCLUDING PAYROLL OF 'DRIVERSD9'4
_jLj�%OF$ Jr 09';x%/
FEDERAL UNEMPLOYMENT TAX (),fD %OF$ yjlL.lr la Dia
STATE UNEMPLOYy ENT TAX b 9 6 %OF$ 1,VL, =
FEDERAL SOCIAL SECURITY TAX bl' % OF s Wl. W'
TOTAL PAYROLL ADOITIVIi—s—
PLUS OF $
TOTAL LABOR $ 7.J7
s x
Q
0' th
go, 00
TOTAL EQUIPMENT
DESCRIPTION I
QTY.
UNIT
COST
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
OTY.
UNIT
COST
AMOUNT
ICaZR
SA
4`3 --.31
91,611-
".(F pili
/7
14-94
Y-11 3
V c
V' eo
-A-oj�
0
Yo. 06
LABOR 39 n. 17
EQUIPMENT
MATERIAL 6'�k
TOTAL BILL $ -Cli—
SUB TOTAL MATERIAL I. lt3
% TAX
PLUS If- OF $
TOTAL MATERIAL �J-r- 6
HUbbE i I l bhUb, PH. 708-559-0223
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
DAILY TIME and MATERIAL or RENTAL REPORT CO T
COPJT. ❑
DATENIC
g ❑
INVOICE T0: /i/� `" ., L✓':'' + �" �S -� _ L /_-L/
STREET •,., ( I1, I
O.
CITY Cos I .a ✓ ,.., JOB TI
�'' � -- --- LOCATIONL_
0 J J� e _
ATTN: M- r �.
DESCf3JPTION OF WORK;
LABOR
EQUIPMENT (MOVE IN 0 OUT a NONE 0 )
CLASSIFICATION
ST
OT
OT
TiOinTA
RATE
'NAMOUN"
AAMYQUNT
DESCRIPTION
HRS.
RATE
AMOUNT
OP'. Cor— ._.l-,
3-/,
1t Zo
77.)0
1i, i0
OP.
it 1. 0'?
it 9.o
owL3
T.D.
T. 0.
f
10
93ifo
93,,Tp
4'(-� t cit
f�/
:LL• -
PL,
LAB. ;,—z z"'
f
✓
i ,3f
)i"
9/,)t
!-
Io(,Z5'
La .p y; F,
L3
ft./
---ALL mm
7
I$.00
Fo'Oo
90.00
G .4""
LAB.
LAB.
to
Q`I,iA
i�r+
x
Z
JO,o�
oo,00
oa,co
f,3
1 9 b
FRM /E•
J�/v
Lj7s
110.61
/10, b >'
rx.a•. _
2-
3
tl
SUBTOTALLABOR $ 93• / $ ))3. /
H.W. & P. FUND • LABORER_LOM HOURS @ _ Pw
V
►�
L S
0000
Joq,R
H.W, & P. FUND • O,PERATOR Q _ HOURS @�
H.W. & P. FUND • 71-0h• r., HOURS @ "t,oa 1p„ o0
SUB TOTAL LABOR $.1
PLUS 3y, % OF S 9".'01
PLUS WORKMENS COMP,. INS, zo.3d %OF $ 793. Ad. 6 -4 -
PUBLIC LIABILITY & PROPERTY DAMAGE INS,
EXCLUDING PAYROLL OF DRIVERS T30 %OF$ 7«.31 /0), /J"
FEOERALUNEMPLOYMENT TAX 0,80 %OF$ 71),fl
STATE UNEMPLOYtY1ENTTAX 6 'OI0 %OF $ )03.11
FEDERAL SOCIAL SECURITY TAX ),(of % OF $ )9f,1 j 73
TOTAL PAYROLL ADDITIVES 390, ”
TOTAL LABOR ' $
_ ,_,•.
__•„�,
TOTAL EQUIPMENT $
MATFRIAI S
DESCRIPTION
OTY,
UNIT COST
AMOUNT
DESCRIPTION
OTY.
UNIT
COST
AMOUNT
vni sc.-
Z
so o,Do
l00 00
1
LABOR $ 160(g. 'tl
EQUIPMENT 103P. iu
MATERIAL ,
TOTAL BILL
SUB TOTAL MATERIAL
% TAX
PLUS \1- 96 OF
TOTAL MATERIAL