HomeMy WebLinkAbout4454_001Next Ordinance No. 4415
Next Resolution No. 12-92
A G E N D A
VILLAUt ULtK&'J UrrIGL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center April 21, 1992
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald I'Skip" Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Clowes Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Floros
IV. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, April 21, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. PROCLAMATION: SENIOR CITIZEN MONTH
B. PROCLAMATION: EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES
C. PROCLAMATION: CHILDRENS FIRE SAFETY FESTIVAL
VII. MAYORIS REPORT
A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
This Ordinance expands the definition of
Alcoholic Liquor to include beverages advertised
as non-alcoholic.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 9-Z-92, 2320 West Lincoln
1. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT AS IT PERTAINS TO PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 2320 WEST LINCOLN STREET
This Ordinance rezones the subject property
from R -X to R-1, Single Family Residence
District, in order to permit a 3 lot
subdivision for single family homes. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
ALL
(Exhibit A)
(Exhibit B)
2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING
MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
FOR THE LINCOLN -HICKORY SUBDIVISION
This ordinance grants for modifications from
Development Code to waive the requirement
to install storm sewers until a future date;
to permit a Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing
installation of street lights until such time
as the Village determines; and to provide a
10 year period during which the residents of
these homes would not be assessed for street
improvements. (Exhibit C)
3. Lincoln -Hickory Plat of Subdivision
This plat authorizes the creation of the
3 lot subdivision.
B. ZBA 14-V-92, 2320 West White Oak
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2320 WHITE OAK
This ordinance grants a variation to reduce
the required 40 foot front yard setback for
the subject property to 28.3 feet in order to
construct a room addition. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit D)
C. ZBA 16-V-92, 906 See Gwun
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 906 SEE GWUN
This ordinance grants a variation to allow
a driveway width of 20 feet. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit E)
D. ZBA 13-A-92, Text Amendment
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I
OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends Section 14.107 relative
to non -conforming uses. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-1.
(Exhibit F)
E.
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO BORROW FUNDS FROM
THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND
(Exhibit G)
F.
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I
OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This ordinance amends Section 9.115 of Chapter 9
to clarify the area necessary for pedestrian
traffic in conjunction with sidewalk cafes.
(Exhibit H)
G.
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I
ENTITLED "DISORDERLY CONDUCT" OF CHAPTER 23
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance establishes the prohibition of
drinking alcoholic beverages on public,
commercial and multi -family property.
(Exhibit J)
H.
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVIII
OF CHAPTER 23 ENTITLED "LANDLORD AND TENANT
REGULATIONS" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This ordinance establishes regulations prohibiting
drinking in the parking lots and common areas
of multi -family developments.
(Exhibit K)
I. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V
ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance increases the water and sewer
rates.
(Exhibit L)
J. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ARTICLE XXXIV OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE
This Ordinance establishes an additional
inspection fee for food establishments
requiring more than the normal 4 inspections
per year.
(Exhibit M)
K. Public Hearing
This Public Hearing, called pursuant to proper
legal notice having been published in the
Mount Prospect Daily Herald on April 8, 1992,
is for the purpose of considering the annual
budget proposed for fiscal year 1992/93.
L. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL
BUDGET FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1992 TO
APRIL 30, 1993 IN LIEU OF PASSAGE OF AN
APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE.
(Exhibit N)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. A RESOLUTON REGARDING THE RELEASE OF
EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES (Exhibit 0)
B. A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING POLICY ON NAMING
OF PUBLIC PLACES (Exhibit P)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. High Service Pump replacement
2. Railroad parking lot
B. Request to authorize increase in contract
with Allied Asphalt Company for the 1990
resurfacing project in the amount of $7,672.13.
C. Request to ratify action taken to make emergency
sewer repairs in parkway at 202 South Owen at a
cost not to exceed $15,000.
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. The purpose of this Executive Session is to
discuss Litigation and Personnel.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
K
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: ADDENDUM TO MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING
OF VILLAGE BOARD HELD MARCH 17, 1992
DATE: APRIL 16, 1992
Attached are copies of Page 2 and 3 of the minutes of the regular
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustee held March 17, 1992
indicating (*) where the addendum suggested by Trustee Clowes
would be inserted.
The Addendum page is also attached.
If the proposed Addendum is acceptable to the Board, the new pages
(2 and 3) with the asterisks will be substituted in the official
minute book with the Addendum attached as the last page.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
caf/
Atts.
cc: John Dixon
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
COMPLAINT: A resident of Prospect Heights who recently purchased
REAL ESTATE a townhouse in Mount Prospect, complained about having
TRANSFER TAX to pay a 3% real estate transfer tax and asked the
purpose of the tax.
Trustee Corcoran arrived at this point.
MAYORIS REPORT
PRESENTATION:
Mayor Farley presented David Jepson, Finance Director,
with the Certificate of Financial Excellence awarded
by the Government Finance officers Association.
OLD BUSINESS
AMEND ORD. 4281
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
215 E. PROSPECT
amend Ordinance No. 4281, pertaining to property
AVENUE
located at 215 East Prospect Avenue, by extending the
effective date for one additional year.
It was noted that the Petitioner will have all the
necessary documents and drawings in order to apply for
building permits for the proposed addition to this
commercial establishment within 6 months.
Trustee Cloves, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4407
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4407.
AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4281
PERTAINING TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 215 EAST
PROSPECT AVENUE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SWANCC
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would approve and authorize the execution of a Project
Use Agreement with SWANCC (Solid Waste Agency of
Northern Cook County).
Several residents and interested parties expressed
their opposition to the Village's commitment to
membership in SWANCC.
*Addendum attached to these minutes.
ORD.NO. 4408
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4408
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A PROJECT USE AGREEMENT (SWANCC)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: Clowes
Motion carried.
Page 2 - March 17, 1992
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would create a Municipal Waste System (SWANCC).
Several residents and interested parties expressed
opposition to the proposed Ordinance and transfer
site in unincorporated Wheeling Township.
Trustee Wilks suggested an Advisory Committee be
established to oversee the operations of the transfer
site to guarantee the quality of well water in that
area and to monitor the property values in that area.
Trustee Wilks said it was important to work within the
system to keep it answerable to us.
**Addendum attached to these minutes
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4409
AN ORDINANCE CREATING A MUNICIPAL WASTE
SYSTEM (SWANCC)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: Clowes
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 8-V-92, 2005 East Euclid Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
an accessory storage shed 216 square feet in size,
rather than the permitted 120 square feet, which
shed will have a height of 11.5 feet, rather than
the permitted 10 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendations of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the variations in ZBA 8-V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
on April 7th.
ZBA 9-Z-92, 2320 West Lincoln Street
The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from R -X,
granted upon annexation, to R-1 (Single Family
Residence District) in order to permit a 3 lot
single family home subdivision. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-0.
It was noted that there is an existing home on the
subject property, which will be demolished therefore
permitting the creation of 3 lots, all meeting
Village regulations, when 3 single family homes
will be constructed.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the request in ZBA 9-Z-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 - March 17, 1992
SWANCC
10) *14 DIN Z193K, E161*1
ZBA 8-V-92
2005 EUCLID
ZBA 9-Z-92
2320 LINCOLN
ADDENDUM TO
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
MARCH 17, 1992
Trustee Clowes questioned the credibility of the private
sector tipping fees projected by SWANCC. He said that using
average tipping fees produced private sector rates that
were lower than SWANCC's. He pointed out that Gallatin
Nationals had proposed handling Mount Prospect' garbage for
$45-$55/ton, including baling, transportation and tipping
fees. Mr. William Abolt said that SWANCC's projections were
conservative and that Peat Marwick had provide an
independent analysis of rates.
Trustee Hoefert said that Gallatin's proposal was very
vague and asked what would happen if Mount Prospect
relied on the private section> Mr. Abolt agreed that
the proposal was vague and said that Gallatin would
add $17-$18 million to SWANCC's projected costs.
Mr. Douglas Keats of Gallatin National said that Trustee
Clowes' comments about Gallatin's costs were correct
and questioned Mr. Abolt's comments about Gallatin.
Trustee Corcoran said that he had asked for a 20 year
price from Gallatin and had not received it.
Trustee Clowes stated that SWANCC's reason for being
was their claim that private section landfill capacity
would not be available. Since companies like Gallatin
were making new landfill capacity available he saw no
reason to make SWANCC an operational agency.
Mr. Richard Hendricks provided information on the
baling facility in Iron Mountain, Michigan.
Mr. Howie Sadler stated that SWANCC was not needed
and said he had yet to hear of a government agency
that could beat the private sector.
Trustee Floros said that SWANCC was not foisted on
us; we create it.
Trustee Corcoran stated that any new landfill will
be expensive because of new IEPA regulations. He said
that since SWANCC could get lower interest rates than
the private sector and had no profit motive, this would
leave more money in taxpayers' pockets. He said that
we owed SWANCC over $1 million and that Gallatin's
prices were already at SWANCC's projected level.
Trustee Hoefert said that SWANCC is an insurance policy
for the future and that waste disposal was the only
piece of municipal services that Mount Prospect didn't
already provide.
Trustee Clowes said that there was no landfill crisis
and no market failure in solid waste. He said SWANCC
was created to provide landfill space and yet still,
didn't have a permitted landfill. He said if the
Bartlett balefill is not approved, we would have
SWANCC operating transfer stations and shipping our
solid waste to private sector landfills like Gallatin.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
APRIL 7, 1992
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Clowes. INVOCATION"
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the Regular meeting of the APPROVE
Mayor and Board of Trustees held March 17, 1992 MINUTES
were presented. Trustee Clowes asked that the
minutes reflect the discussion that took place
relative to Mount Prospect becoming a member of
SWANCC.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert,
moved to approve the minutes of the Regular
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees
held March 17, 1992, as amended.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Floros, Hoefert, Farley
Nays: None
Pass: Busse
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes,
moved to approve the minutes of the Special
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees
held March 24, 1992.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Floros, Hoefert, Farley
Nays: None
Pass: Busse
Motion carried.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes,
moved to approve the minutes of the Special
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees
held March 28, 1992.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Floros, Hoefert, Farley
Nays: None
Pass: Busse
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, APPROVE BILIS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 485,718
Refusal Disposal Fund
183,093
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
5,649
Community Development Block Grant Fund 2,923
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
11,676
Water & Sewer Fund
66,639
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,721
Risk Management Fund
71,874
Vehicle Replacement Fund
-
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.
5,306
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
576
Fire & Police Building Const.
6,807
Flood Control Revenue Fund
90,581
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
-
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
17,453
Police Pension Fund
49,983
Firemen's Pension Fund
50,127
Benefit Trust Fund
Village Engineer, on behalf of the Illinois Association
$1,050,126
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Floros,
Hoefert
WAIVE FEES
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - April 7, 1992
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Farley proclaimed April 24, 1992 as Global Releaf
GLOBAL RELEAF
Day in Mount Prospect.
CONTEST WINNER
Sandy Clark, Village Forester, explained that many
residents had participated in a Global Releaf project
by planting trees. The names of those participating
in the project were entered into this contest with the
winner receiving a gift certificate for landscape
shrubbery.
Mrs. Clark drew the name of Ralph Kropp as the winner
of the Global Releaf Contest.
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Farley proclaimed April 22, 1992 as Girl Scout
GIRL SCOUT
Leader's Day in Mount Prospect.
LEADER'S DAY
PRESENTATION:
Mayor Farley announced that the Village of Mount
Prospect, through the efforts of the Village Engineer,
has been acknowledged as one of 8 municipalities in the
State of Illinois as an active participant in the
National Flood Insurance Program.
Mayor Farley presented a plaque to Jeff Wulbecker,
Village Engineer, on behalf of the Illinois Association
for Flood Plain and Stormwater Management.
JAYCEES:
Linda Malik, representing the Mount Prospect Jaycees
WAIVE FEES
Club, announced that the Jaycees would be conducting
their annual Memorial Day Carnival at the Mount
Prospect Plaza May 20 - 25, 1992. In conjunction with
the carnival, a request was presented for the Village
to waive all fees and out of pocket expenses involved
with this carnival.
Page 2 - April 7, 1992
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to waive all fees and out of pocket expenses normally
associated with conducting a carnival.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Kays: None
Motion carried.
Tim Murphy, President of the Mount Prospect Lions LIONS CLUB:
Club, stated the annual Lions Club Village Fair WAIVE FEES
will be July 1 - 5, 1992, and requested the
Village to waive all fees and out of pocket
expenses normally associated with conducting
a carnival.
Mr. Murphy also requested the Village budget $2,500
towards the total cost of $12,000 for the July 4th
fireworks display.
Mr. Murphy also stated since the Village Fair has
been held at Melas Park, the Lions Club has retained
the services of a private security company for the
3 streets just east of Melas Park on the north side
of Central Road. This security is necessary to
prohibit customers of the Fair from parking in this
single family neighborhood and to provide security
from possible vandalism and/or theft. The cost for
the private security over the period of the Fair
is approximately $2,600. Mr. Murphy asked if the
Village would approve sworn officers for security
with the Lions Club sharing the cost of the over-
time on a 50/50 basis, which would reduce the cost
to the Lions Club.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to waive all fees and out of pocket expenses in
conjunction with the Village Fair, to budget $2,500
towards the July 4th fireworks display and to
allow police officers to provide the security in
the single family neighborhood to the east of
Melas Park with the cost of the police officers
to the shared by the Village and the Lions Club
on a 50/50 basis.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert
Kays: None
Motion carried.
Frank Vlazny, 2103 Jody Court, expressed concern AUDITORIUM
and opposition relative to the proposal to build
an auditorium at Lincoln Jr. High as a joint
venture between the Village, School District 57,
Mount Prospect Public Library and Mount Prospect
Park District. Mr. Vlazny also asked that the
Village support efforts to restructure the taxing
system in the State of Illinois.
Richard Hendricks, 1537 East Emmerson Lane, stated SIGNS
that he had asked to be placed on the agenda for
the purpose of discussing what he perceived as
an over -sized sign recently installed at
Courtesy Home Center.
Trudy Bernt, 3 West Euclid Avenue, stated that CHURCH:
she had previously brought to the Board's attention 1 W. EUCLID
that the single family home at the corner of
Page 3 - April 7,1992
Elmhurst Road and Euclid, I West Euclid Avenue, which
had been converted to a church some 5 years ago has now
received a permit from the Village to install a parking
lot in the rear yard. At that time several members of
the Board expressed concern that installation of a
parking lot in a single family zoning district was
permitted under the Village's Zoning ordinance.
Mrs. Bernt stated that while she understands the
permits have been issued for this parking lot, she
asked the Board to consider regulations governing the
conversion of single family homes to churches in order
to provide regulations in the future to protect other
residents.
Members of the Village Board asked the administration
to gather information and/or draft some type '-of
regulations governing conversion to churches for the
Board to consider at a meeting in the near future.
Trustee Floros asked for a legal opinion as to whether
this matter should have gone before the Zoning Board
of Appeals.
CONGRATULATIONS Patrick Breen, 212 North Prospect Manor, complimented
75TH ANNIVERSARY the Village and 75th Anniversary Committee on all the
COMMITTEE activities being held in conjunction with the year -
,long celebration.
MAYOR'S REPORT
AMEND CH. 13 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
expand the definition of Alcoholic Liquor to include
near beer and products advertised as non-alcoholic.
NEAR BEER Mayor Farley stated that while advertised as non -
NON -ALCOHOLIC alcoholic, there is a small percentage of alcohol in
PRODUCTS these products and under -age persons are attempting to
purchase these products.
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for second
reading.
,OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 8-V-92 ZBA 8-V-92, 2005 East Euclid Avenue
2005 EUCLID An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
allow an accessory storage shed 216 square feet in
size, rather than the permitted 120 square feet, which
shed will have a height of 11.5 feet, rather than the
permitted 10 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4411 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
Page 4 - April 7, 1992
passage of Ordinance No. 4411
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2005 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 9-Z-92, 2320 West Lincoln Street ZBA 9-Z-92
An Ordinance was presented for first reading 2320 LINCOLN
that would rezone the subject property from R -X,
granted upon annexation, to R-1 (Single Family
Residence District) in order to permit a 3 lot
single family home subdivision. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-0.
There was discussion as to whether this area
should have streets, sewers, and curbs installed.
Village Manager Dixon stated that an estimated
cost for these improvements would be approximately
$300,000, which cost would be assessed against
the property owners as a Special Service Area.
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for
second reading.
An Ordinance was also presented for first reading
relative to the property commonly known as
2320 West Lincoln.
This Ordinance grants modifications from the
Development Code to waive the required storm sewers
until a future date; to permit a Restrictive Covenant
guaranteeing installation of street lights at such
time as the Village determines appropriate; and,
to provide a 10 year period during which the residents
of these homes would not be assessed for street
improvements.
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for
second reading.
ZBA 10-V-92, 507 Go Wando ZBA 10-V-92
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 507'GO WANDO
would grant a variation to allow a 141 411 rear
yard setback, rather than the required 25 feet
in order to permit an addition to the home. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floras,
Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 5 - Afril 7, 1992
ORD.NO. 4412
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4412
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 507 GO WANDO
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 11-V-92
ZBA 11-V-92 and 12 -SU -92, 401 Ojibwa Trail
ZBA 12 -SU -92
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
401 OJIBWA TRAIL
grant variations to allow a 281 211 front yard, rather
than the required 40 feet, to allow a 34% lot coverage,
rather than the permitted 25%, in order to construct
an addition; to allow a circular driveway with a 341
width, rather the permitted 21 foot width; and,. a
Special Use to allow a garage designed to house more
than two vehicles. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4413
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4413
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS AND
SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
401 OJIBWA TRAIL
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 14-V-92 ZBA 14-V-92, 2320 West White Oak
2320 WHITE OAK The Petitioner is requesting a variation to reduce the
required 40 foot front yard setback for the subject
property, zoned R -X, in order to building a room
addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
Trustee Busse, * seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 14-
V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented April 21st for first
reading.
ZBA 15-V-92 ZBA 15-V-92, 201 North Deneen Lane
201 DENEEN LANE It was noted that this case had been withdrawn by the
Petitioner.
Page 6 - April 7, 1992
ZBA 16-V-92, 906 See Gwun
ZBA 16-V-92
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
906 SEE GWUN
increase the maximum driveway width from 15 feet
to 20 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals'and grant the variation requested
in ZBA 16-V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading
at the April 21st meeting of the Village Board.
ZBA 13-A-92, Text Amendment
ZBA 13-A-92
The administration is requesting a text amendment
AMEND CH 14
relative to non -conforming structures and uses.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these amendments by a vote of 6-1.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the amendments to
Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) being the subject
of ZBA 13-A-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented April 21st for
first reading.
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
WATER
would authorize the Village of Mount Prospect to
POLLUTION
participate in the Water Pollution Control
CONTROL
Revolving Fund.
FUND
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for
second reading.
A Resolution was presented expressing the Village's
COOK COUNTY
support in a countywide flood and stormwater
STORMWATER
mitigation. It was noted that this proposal is
MITIGATION
recommended by the Northwest Municipal Conference
and may assist stormwater management.
Trustee Clowes expressed concern relative to
the creation of another governmental agency.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
RES.NO. 9-92
for passage of Resolution No. 9-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floros, Hoefert, Farley
Nays: Clowes
Motion carried.
Page 7 - April 7,1992
REFERENDUM
A Resolution was presented declaring the results
RESULTS:
of the Referendum held March 17, 1992, relative
PURCHASE
to whether the Village of Mount Prospect and the
CITIZENS
City of Prospect Heights should purchase the
UTILITIES WATER
the Citizens Utilities Water system located within
SYSTEM
Wheeling Township.
It was noted that the referendum question received
a greater number of negative votes.
RES.NO. 10-92
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved tr
passage of Resolution No. 10-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Kays: None
Notion carried.
AMEND CH.9
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
SIDEWALK CAFES
clarify the area necessary for pedestrian traffic in
conjunction with sidewalk cafes.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading, on
April 21st.
AMEND CH. 23
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
DISORDERLY
prohibit drinking alcoholic beverages on public,
CONDUCT
commercial and multi -family property.
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for second
reading.
AMEND CH.23
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
LANDLORD TENANT
amend the Landlord Tenant regulations by prohibiting
the drinking of alcoholic beverages in parking lots and
common areas.
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for second
reading.
AMEND CH. 4
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
ESDA
amend Article X of Chapter 4 of the Village Code by
designating the Village Manager as the Director of the
Emergency Services Disaster Agency (ESDA).
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4414
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4414
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE X OF CHAPTER 4
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH.22
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
WATER & SEWER
increase the water and sewer rates. The cost of water
RATE INCREASE
would be increased from $2.62 to $2.75 per 1,000
gallons.
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for second
reading.
Page 8 - April 7, 1992
A request was presented by NTN Bearing Company to NTN BEARING
reconsider the action of the Village Board taken at SIGNS
the March 17th meeting denying their request for a
field change to permit two free standing signs.
It was noted that a Board member voting against the
request would be necessary in order to bring this
matter to the floor.
No motion to reconsider this item was made, therefore
denying the request for reconsideration.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that AMEND CH. 11
would amend Article XXXIV of Chapter 11 (Business
License) to provide for 4 inspections for food
establishments, rather than the existing 6
inspections. Additional fees would be charged for
establishments requiring more than the 4 inspections.
This Ordinance will be presented April 21st for
second reading.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the BIDS:
following bid results on various items.
The following bids were received for parkway PARKWAY
restoration: RESTORATION
Bidder, Unit Cost -Sq. Yd.
America's Lawn & Garden $ 1.95
Taking Kare of Business 6.25
D & J Landscaping Co. 6.75
Arlington Turf Landscape Cont. 12.00
Autumn Landscaping & Maintenance 12.75
Northwestern Landscape Cont. 13.00
Ingram Enterprises, Inc. 14.50
It was noted that the low bid received from America's
Lawn & Garden did not meeting the specifications.,
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved TAKING KARE
to reject all bids for parkway restoration and OF BUSINESS
accept the proposal submitted by Taking Kare of
Business in the amount not to exceed $13,500.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for turf mowing TURF
for several municipal properties throughout the MOWING
Village:
15�- .1
America's Lawn & Garden $21,106.00
Autumn Landscaping & Maintenance 29,692.00
Lundstrum's 33,644.00
D & J Landscaping Co. 36,845.42
Wilson 38,740.00
Excel 39,598.00
Northwestern 46,683.00
Bertog's 55,523.00
Taking Kare of Business 126,342.42
Hansen's 138,840.00
Page 9 - April 7, 1992
It was noted that the bid received from America's Ian
& Garden did not meet the specifications of the
Page 10 - April 7, 1992
Village.
AUTUMN
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
LANDSCAPING
to reject all bids received for turf mowing and
accept the proposal submitted by Autumn Landscaping &
Maintenance in an amount not to exceed $28,000.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FIRE HOSE
The following bids were received'for the purchase of
& NOZZLES
hose and nozzles:
Bidder 501 100, Nozzles
Great Lakes $110.00 $208.00 $55.00
Able 163.00 276.00 59.85
Dolton 94.50* 172.50*
Mac's 101.00* 190.00* 57.00
*The items bid did not meet specifications established.
GREAT LAKES
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
accept the qualified bid submitted by Great Lakes for
the purchase of fire hose and nozzles in an amount not
to exceed $7,760.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMPACT
The following bids were received for the purchase of
STATION
one compact station wagon as a pool car for the
WAGON
village:
Bidder Model Amount
Hoskins Chev. Chev.Cavalier VL Wagon $10,700.00
Tom Todd Chev. Chev.Cavalier RS Wagon 10,898.42
Lattof Chev. Chev. IJC35 Wagon 11,462.32
It was noted that Hoskins Chevrolet had informed the
administration that an error was made in their bid and
requested that their bid be withdrawn.
TOM TODD CHEV.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the low qualified bid submitted by Tom Todd
Chevrolet for one compact station wagon in an amount
not to exceed $10,898.42.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
It was noted that the item entitled Road Reconstruction
on the agenda was the same of street resurfacing also
listed on the agenda.
RESURFACING
The following bids were received for the resurfacing
Page 10 - April 7, 1992
program/1992 general maintenance program:
Bidder Amount
Arrow Road Construction $403,982.79
Palumbo Bros. Inc. 420,608.33
Allied Asphalt Paving Co. 433,403.00
Peter Baker & Son, Inc. 456,588.96
J. A. Johnson Paving Co. 529,139.15
Callaghan Paving, Inc. 572,342.40
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved ARROW ROAD
to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and accept the low qualified bid
submitted by Arrow Road Construction in an
amount not to exceed $403,582.79.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Kays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the curb and CURB &
gutter program: GUTTER
Bidder Amount
Roadworks, Inc. $276,858.20
Trialta Construction Co. 278,611.60
Gem Construction Co. 283,313.00
F & V Cement Co. 295,014.53
Globe Construction Co. 295,888.60
M & A Cement Co. 295,975.44
Schroeder & Schroeder 325,534.67
M & C Scavelli, Inc. 326,115.20
Martam Construction Co. 362,050.40
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved ROADWORKS,INC
to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and accept the low qualified bid
submitted by Roadworks, Inc. in the amount of
$276,858.20 for the curb and gutter program.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Kays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance was presented for first reading that 1992/93 BUDGET
would adopt the annual budget for the Village for
fiscal year 1992/93.
It was noted that this ordinance will be presented
April 21st for second reading in conjunction with
a Public Hearing on this proposed budget.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
A Resolution was presented that would authorize TRANSFER
the transfer of jurisdiction relative to
maintenance of that portion of Camp Mc Donald
Road lying between Elmhurst Road and Rand Road,
to the City of Prospect Heights.
Page 11 - April 7, 1992
RES.NO. 11-92
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 11-92
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION OF THAT
PORTION OF CAMP MC DONALD ROAD LOCATED WITHIN
THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT WEST OF ELMHURST ROAD TO THE
CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
LEGAL
Trustee Hoefert requested a legal opinion addressing
OPINION:
the Village's stand relative to signs on berms offering
SIGNS ON BERMS
an interpretation and clarification on that subject.
SWANCC
Trustee Clowes requested a 60 - 90 day moratorium on
the proposed balefill agreement with SWANCC. Trustee
Clowes noted that permits have not been issued as yet
for the balefill site and expressed concern that this
transfer station may be constructed with no municipal
balefill site available.
Village Manager Dixon noted that a need exists for a
balefill site.
No action was taken on this request.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
EXECUTIVE Mayor Farley asked that the Board adjourn into
SESSION Executive Session for the purpose of reviewing and
determining if minutes of previous Executive Session
can be released.
The Board went into Executive Session at 9:54 P.M.
RECONVENE The Board reconvened at 11:19 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Busse
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Floros
Trustee Hoefert
It was noted that the minutes of the following
Executive Sessions would be released through passage
of an appropriate Resolution at the next regular
meeting of the Board on April 21st:
October 8, 1991
October 15, 1991
November 19, 1992
December 10, 1991
January 2,1992
March 3, 1992
Page 12 - April 7, 1992
ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried..
The meeting was adjourned at 11:20 PM.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 13 - April 7, 1992
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
April 16, 1992
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
4/01/92 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
-4101192
4/16192
List of Bills
Entry 4116192
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 3,472,771
$ 932,737
$1,136,530
$ 3,268,978
Refuse Disposal Fund
419,148
69,936
397,355
91,729
Motor Fuel Tax
622,024
73,152
13,332
681,844
Community Development Block Grant Fund
27,734
-
6,528
21,206
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
244,076
19,118
147,663
115,531
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,754,005
125,933
411,894
3,468,044
Parking System Revenue
199,214
7,450
5,177
201,487
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,328,960
21,042
114,330
1,235,672
Vehicle Replacement Fund
458,157
21
822
457,356
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,596,806
19,543
17,515
1,598,834
Downtown Redev Const Funds
561,765
2,399
135
564,029
Police & Fire Building Construction
5,323,547
1,454
237,194
5,087,807
Flood Control Construction Fund
4,733,376
86,651
-
4,820,027
Debt Service Funds
1,192,080
4,472
15,000
1,181,552
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
5,658
9,103
9,676
5,085
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,411,884
34,004
34,937
1,410,951
Police Pension Fund
17,173,926
72,032
-
17,245,958
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,104,903
110,815
-
19,215,718
Benefit Trust Funds
240 997
140
2,167
238,970
$61,871.031
$1.590.002
92,550.255
$60,910,778
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4116/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AAH-HA WEIDNER
C10558 AAH-HA WEIDNER
$100.00
$100.00
GLENN AMUNDSON
C5266 AMUNDSON
$75.00
$75.00
HWA M. AN
REFUND STICKER
$20.00
$20.00
HYE JA AN
REFUND STICKER
$20.00
$20.00
ARMOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION
COMMISSION DUE
$118.91
$118.91*
JOEL AUDINO
C9405 AUDINO
$100.00
$100.00
MARIAN BETZ
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$80.92
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$8.16
$89.08
C & P REMODELING
C10209 C&P REMODELING
$100.00
$100.00
CITIBANK,N.A.
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB
$15,459.42
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB
$41,672.73
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS
$100.72
PAYMENT OF INS CLAIMS -GAB
$5,430.63
$62,663.50*
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PMT P/R 4/16/92
$224.25
PMT P1R 4/0292
$224.25
$448.50*
NEAL CROST
REFUNbD STT CK R
$20.00
$20.00
CUMMINS ALLISON
C4885 CUMMINS ALLISON
$500.00
$500.00
F. J. DE SPAIN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$7.14
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$7.86*
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
P/R ENDING 4/2/92
$401,116.66
P1R ENDING 412192
$1,047.42
P1R ENDING 412192
$728.58
P/R ENDING 412192
$37,035.40
PfENDING 4 2192
$1,779.51
PR ENDING 4/16192
$7R 28.58
PR ENDING 4/16192
$35,580.23
PR ENDING 4116192
$1,779.51
PR ENDING 4116192
$397,333.48
PR ENDING 4/16792
$824.00
$877,953.37*
MLADEN DJOKIC
C10502 DJOK C
$100.00
$100.00
DONALD A. DREESSEN D.V.M.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.96
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$9.52
$10.48
MICHAEL W. FERDINAND
R1E TRANSFER TAX REBATE
$446.00
$446.00
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
M R92 MED BENEFIT REIMB
$8,191.33
MAR92 DEP CARE REIMB
$1,485.00
$9,676.33*
ENZO FREDIANI
REFUND OVERPMT
$3.36
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/26/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
REFUND OVERPMT
$33.32
REFUND OVERPMT
$3.93
$40.61
MYRTLE GALITZ
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.74
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$7.38
$8.12
GULDEN-BITTEL SEWER SERV.
C10550 GULDEN BITTLE
$75.00
$75.00
WILLIAM HAMBLIN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$16.66
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.68
$18.34
HELMER ACCT. SVCS.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$49.98
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$5.04
$55.02
HUNTINGTON SQUARE APARTMENTS
C9327 HUNTINGTON SQUARE
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
C3960 IBBOTSQN
$100.00
$100.00
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
EMPLOYEE SHARE IMRF-MAR92
$16,822.97
EMPLOYER SHARE IMRF-MAR92
$42,206.75
$59,029.72*
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT PJJR 4/16/92
$254.00
PMT PR O2/92
254.00
508.00
KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL
NUISANCE4ABATEMENT RELEASE
$2$002.00
$2$002.00*
R. L. KUEHNER
880614 KUEHNER C3620
$75.00
$75.00
LAKE-COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY
GASOLINE
$7,883.57
$7,883.57
A. LANDWEHR
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.38
REFD FINAL BILL
$.24
$2.62
LANGOS CORPORATION
C10352 LANGOSWATER CORP
$500.00
$500.00
LAUREL CONSTRUCTION
C10342 LAUREL CONST
$100.00
$100.00
ARLENE LOWE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$10.60
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL51.06
$11.66
MARATHON OIL COMPANY
C10187 MARATHON OIL
$580.00
C10187 MARATHON OIL
$30.00
$530.00
MARLIN SIMON & ASSOC.
C5073 MARLIN SIMON
$75.00
$75.00
MIDWEST MECHANICAL
C10536 MIDWEST MECH
$100.00
$100.00
MARY L. MOTLOCK
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
PPRT-3RD ALLOCATION
$4,969.66
$4,969.66*
JOSEPH MULLENIX
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.20
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$11.90
R E TR TAX REBATE
$364.00
$377.10
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
S VINGS BONDS P%R 4/16
$450.00
SAVINGS BONDS P/R 4/2
$350.00
DUE TO FED DEP PPR 4/2
$1,301.98
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
NORB & SONS ELECTRIC
OPUS
PERMA SEAL
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
ELLEN PLATE
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
PROSPECT HEIGHTS PARK DISTRICT
R 0 R SUPERIOR
PAUL REILLY CO. OF IL., INC.
MARK RISKE
MICHAEL SARNA
MARY SASS
MATTHEW E. SLEDZ
CATHERINE SPORES
JIM STERGIOS
TAQUERIA FIESTA
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
RALPH S. TIMM
TODAY PLUMBING
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
DUE TO FED DEP PR 412
$118.70
DUE TO FED DEP PR 412
$79.11
DUE TO FED DEP PR 412
$11,633.49
DUE TO FED DEP PR 412
$2,789.28
DUE TO FED DEP PR 412
$55.23
$16,777.79-
C10569 NORB & SONS
$150.00
$150.00
C10347 OPUS NORTH
$450.00
$450.00
C10169 PERMASEAL
$50.00
$50.00
EXPENSES
$65.00
MISC EXPENSES
$115.00
$180.00*
PMT P/R 4116192
$225.00
PMT P/R 4702/92
$225.00
$450.00*
POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT
$3,000.00
$3,000.00 *
DEVELOPER DONATIONS
$4,800.00
$4,800.00
920224 ROR SUPERIOR
$100.00
$100.00
C10544 PAUL REILLY$100.00
$ .00
$ .00
REFUND STICKER
$20
$2 0.00
20
$2 0.00
$
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$10.56
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$104.72
$115.28
REFUND TICKET
$20.00
$20.00
C8609 SLEDZ
$100.00
$100.00
C10578 SPORES
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND HEARING FEE
$100.00
$100.00
C10251 TAQUERIA FIESTA
$100.00
$100.00
920401 BOND MONEY
$1,700.00
920402 BOND MONEY
$250.00
920407 BOND MONEY
$1,450.00
920410 BOND MONEY
$950.00
920414 BOND MONEY
$1,200.00
920415 BOND MONEY
$550.00
$6,100.00*
REPLACEMENT CHECK-TTD
$511.21
$511.21*
C10500 TODAY PLBG
$100.00
$100.00
TR TO CAP IMPROVE FUND
$270.00
TR TO CAP IMPROVE FUND
$1,006.13
$1,276.13
TR TO POLICE PENSION FUND
$31,422.72
$31,422.72
C10169 PERMASEAL
$50.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT FIRE PE
CHUTRADEE VORATUT
VULCAN BASEMENT WATERPROOFING
ELEANOR WELDON
GERALD WOJCIK
HENRY WOJTANEK
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16%92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
C10347 OPUS NORTH
C10392 ROTO ROOTER
010550 GULDEN BITTLE
C5073 MARLIN SIMON
C5266 AMUNDSEN
PAS 11163020
880614 R KUEHNER
TR TO RISK MGMT FUND
TR TO RISK MGMT FUND
TR TO CORP PURP 1974
TR TO REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
TR TO RISK MGMT FUND
TR TO GENERAL FUND
TR TO GENERAL FUND
TR TO GENERAL FUND
TR TO GENERAL FUND
TR TO GENERAL FUND
TR TO IMRF FUND
TR TO IMRF FUND
TR TO IMRF FUND
TR TO IMRF FUND
TR TO IMRF FUND
TR TO FIRE PENSION FUND
REFUND STICKER
C10463 VULCAN BASEMENT
REFUND STICKER
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
HLTH INS CONTR REFUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
$50.00
$50.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$41.67
$25.00
$23,150.00
$450.00
$15,000.00
$3,372.62
$143,600.00
$217,676.67
$17,011.31
$1,500.00
$24,569.50
$77,000.00
233.23
325.68
$682.77
$8,382.60
$164.51
$12,147.10
$20.00
$100.00
$20.00
$123.92
$12.49
$16.47
***TOTAL**
PAGE 4
TOTAL
$291.67*
$523,330.10
$9,788.79
$12,147.10
$20.00
$100.00
$20.00
$136.41
$16.47
$1,642,799.12
GENERAL FUND $1,008,536.14 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $221,680.07
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $2,183.76 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $147,663.21
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4116%92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER & SEWER FUND $132,015.59 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $3,626.90
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $62,679.97 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $4,800.00
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 $15,000.00 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $91676.33
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $34,937.15
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
SYMPATHY FLOWERS
$34.00
$34.00
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
75TH ANN MTG SWEET ROLLS
$6.48
$4,330.00
$270.00
75TH ANN MTG-ROLLS
$5.40
$11.88
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
DINNER-FARLEYIFRITZ
$150.00
$45.00*
DINNER-FARLEY
$20.27
BREAKFAST TIX FARLEYIWILKS
$40.00
$210.27
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$81.32
EXPENSES
$5.56
$86.88
SEMINARS INTERNATIONAL
PROBLEM SOLVING TAPES
$37.95
$37.95
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
***TOTAL**
$380.98
GENERAL FUND
$380.98
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
IRENE F. BAHR
CERTIFIED REPORTING COMPANY
DELOITTE & TOUCHE
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
ILLINOIS GFOA
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
SERVICES RENDERED
SERVICES RENDERED
CONSULTING SERVICES
CONSULTING SERVICES
PHYSICAL-PFEIFER
3 REGISTRATONS
REGISTER JEPSON WIDMER
EMPLOYEE RECOG LUNCHEON
$1,350.25
$1,350.25
$291.50
$291.50
$2,165.00
$2,165.00
$4,330.00
$270.00
$270.00
$60.00
$60.00
$70.00
$70.00
$45.00
$45.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4%16192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$169.05
$169.05
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$17.41
MISC EXPENSES
$20.70
$38.11*
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$33.81
$33.81*
BARRY A. SPRINGER
LEGAL SERVICES
$4,387.50
$4,387.50
V & G PRINTERS INC.
BUSINESS CARDS-RUSSELL
$39.00
$39.00
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
FEBRUARY LEGAL SERVICES
$677.79
$677.79
XEROX CORP.
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
$263.81
$263.81
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$12,025.82
GENERAL FUND
$12,025.82
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AT&T
016 089 7465 001
$549.06
$549.06
COMP USA
SOFTWARE
$70.98
$70.98
EDWARD FRANCE
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
HOMETOWN USA VIDEO FESTIVAL
`CONTEST TAPES-POSTAGE
$12.00
$12.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$188.68
SERVICE
$2,453.91
SERVICE
$50.00
$2,692.59
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
PHONE SYSTEM MTCE
$75.00
FAX LINE
$62.75
$137.75
MARISHA JASON
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00-
JOHN KEANE
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00$25.00
CAROLYN A. MILLER
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
NFLCP-N.E. ILLINOIS CHAPTER
REGISTER-SANBORN
$15.00
$15.00
CHERYL L. PASALIC
EXPENSES
$47.33
$47.33
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$60.32
MISC EXPENSES
$69.43
MISC EXPENSES
$1.76
$131.51*
GENERAL FUND
$4,385.17
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
COFFEE BREAK, INC.
COMMERCE CLEARING HOUSE, INC.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
METRO EXPRESS, INC.
OFFICE SUPPLY CENTER
PEDERSEN &-HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
TRACS
CAROL WIDMER
WOLF AND COMPANY
XEROX CORP.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
COFFEE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$42.10
PAGE 7
$27.25
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
ACCOUNTING SEMINAR
$300.00
$300.00
• PAYMENT DATE 411692
$194.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
DELIVERY
$18.90
REAL GRAPHIX
CABLE TV PERMIT FORMS
$74.00
$74.00
RING SOFTWARE
SOFTWARE
$439.95
$439.95
CHRIS SANBORN
EXPENSES
$90.00
$90.00
JONNA SHOUB
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
$34.29
***TOTAL**
$4,385.17
GENERAL FUND
$4,385.17
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
COFFEE BREAK, INC.
COMMERCE CLEARING HOUSE, INC.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
METRO EXPRESS, INC.
OFFICE SUPPLY CENTER
PEDERSEN &-HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
TRACS
CAROL WIDMER
WOLF AND COMPANY
XEROX CORP.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
COFFEE
$42.10
$42.10
1992 TAX PUBLICATION
$27.25
$27.25
ACCOUNTING SEMINAR
$300.00
$300.00
APRIL MICE
$194.00
MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$52.00
$246.00
DELIVERY
$18.20
DELIVERY
$18.90
$37.10
XEROX 1090 DRY INK
$109.00
$109.00
TR TAX TRANS MARCH92
$620.00
$620.00
EXPENSES
$11.09
MISC EXPENSES
$3.45
MISC EXPENSES
$5.58
$20.12*
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$34.29
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$71.89
$106.18
JAN -APR CONNECT FEES
$50.00
$50.00
TUITION REIMBURSEMENT
$948.75
$948.75
1991 TIF AUDIT
$600.00
$600.00
MARCH CHGS 1090 COPIER
$891.46
$891.46
APRIL MICE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
***TOTAL**
$4,011.00
GENERAL FUND
$1,642.39
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD FEBRUARY PPO SERVICE FEE $364.50
APRIL EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM $10,413.49
MED CLAIMS THRU 3/26 $9,174.08
MED CLAIMS THRU 449 $27,029.07 $46,981.14*
CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS. RISK MGMT SERVICE $500.00 $500.00
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. APRIL SERVICE FEES $886.00 $886.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
. PAYMENT DATE 4%16/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$4,011.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
SUBSCRIPTION
52.50
52.50
THE DRAWING BOARD INC.
TYVEK ENVELOPES
$24.13
$24.13
JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
LEGAL NOTICES
$770.14
$770.14
NORTHERN ILLINOIS TOURISM CNCL
BOOKLETS
$27.00
$27.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$71.60
$71.60
ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERY
$24.95
$24.95
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
LEGAL PAGE
$55.38
LEGAL PAGE
$55.38
LEGAL PAGE
$60.66
LEGAL PAGE
$68.57
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
$472.07
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$1,642.39
GENERAL FUND
$1,642.39
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD FEBRUARY PPO SERVICE FEE $364.50
APRIL EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM $10,413.49
MED CLAIMS THRU 3/26 $9,174.08
MED CLAIMS THRU 449 $27,029.07 $46,981.14*
CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS. RISK MGMT SERVICE $500.00 $500.00
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. APRIL SERVICE FEES $886.00 $886.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
REIMBURSEMENT
$240.95
$240.95
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
SVCS-CEISEL
$14.00
$14.00
ELAINE KOZICK
FULL & FINAL SETTLEMENT
$1,211.89
$1,211.89
LYONS EQUIPMENT CO.
EQUIPMENT
$1,301.10
$1,301.10*
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
9900115439-X SVCS
$413.00
$413.00
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
SERVICES-LIPNISKY
$15.00
$15.00
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR HLTH MAGAZINE
$65.70
$65.70*
MICHAEL J. THOMAS
DAMAGED MAILBOX REIMB
$16.95
$16.95
LYNN WINSTON
DAMAGED MAILBOX REIMB
$4.27
$4.27
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
***TOTAL**
$51,650.00
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$51,650.00
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
AMERICAN MANAGEMENT ASSOC.
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$160.00
$160.00
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
WHITE XEROX PAPER
$13.82
$13.82
COMP USA
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$43.47
$43.47
THE DRAWING BOARD INC.
SUPPLIES
$39.91
$39.91
DRINKING WATER & BACKFLOW PREY
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$32.50
$32.50
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
ENVELOPES/BUSINESS CARDS
$79.00
$79.00
MICHAEL FRONTZAK
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$175.00
$175.00
LAN MAGAZINE
SUBSCRIPTION
$19.97
$19.97
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
3 THERMOMETERS
$51.75
$51.75
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$31.79
$31.79
PC WORLD
SUBSCRIPTION
$19.97
$19.97
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$35.76
EXPENSES
$11.09
EXPENSES
$16.66
MISC EXPENSES
$5.58
MISC EXPENSES
$53.50
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$370.05
PAGE 10
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$18.98
$18.98
BOB'S RELOADING INC.
• PAYMENT DATE 4%16/92
$1,856.50
$1,856.50
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
TUITION-ROSCOP/WAGNER
$273.00
$273.00
CEPA PRODUCTS, INC.
MISC EXPENSES
$2.83
$47.25
COMPUTERLAND
MISC EXPENSES
$7.77
$133.19*
PROSAFETY
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$20.91
$20.91
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$210.00
$210.00
SANISAFE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
REGISTER-JASTER
$215.00
$215.00*
SOUTHERN ILL. UNIV. AT EDWARD.
REGISTER HANNEMAN
$135.00
$135.00
CHRISTINE VANDORNICK
SEMINAR MILEAGE
$23.38
$23.38
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$109.50
$109.50
JEFFREY WULBECKER
SEMINAR
$28.60
$28.60
XEROX CORP.
MICE CONTRACT
$140.17
MTCE 2510 COPIER
$196.10
MTCE
CSERVICE OPIER
$$13.21
$$13.48
XL / DATACOMP INC.
APRILIMTCE035
$13.04
$13.04
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$2,084.28
GENERAL FUND
$2,084.28
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
SERVICE
$370.05
$370.05
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
GASOLINE
$18.98
$18.98
BOB'S RELOADING INC.
AMMUNITION
$1,856.50
$1,856.50
MARK BONNER
EXPENSES
$67.27
$67.27
BUFFALO GROVE FIRE DEPARTMENT
TUITION-ROSCOP/WAGNER
$273.00
$273.00
CEPA PRODUCTS, INC.
RUBBER GLOVES
$47.25
$47.25
COMPUTERLAND
COMPUTER
$2,449.00
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$660.00
CABLE CENTRONIX
$15.00
$3,124.00
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
CREDITMF
$13.17 -
CAD REPORT FORMS
$781.09
MAILING LABELS
$129.08
$897.00
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
D -B ENTERPRISES
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
GALL'S, INC.
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
ANTHONY A. HALACHOULIS
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
I.C.P.A.
ILLINOIS ANIMAL CONTROL ASSN.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE ACADEMY
STEVEN R. JENKINS CO., INC
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
MAUREEN KERRIGAN
KROCH'S & BRENTANO'S, INC.
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
EXTINGUISHER RE CHARGE
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
TIRES
EXPENSES
SOFTWARE
REGISTER ROSCOP/WAGNER
TUITION-DALE/DUFFKIS
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
TUITION-BONNER RECKER
REGISTER -HALAL OULIS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
POLICE PATCHES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
PUBLICATION
GOGGLES
FILM
FILM
CAMERA LENS & FILTER
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$90.00
$88.65
$128.40
$390.96
$179.91
$1,032.80
$30.00
$75.00
$160.00
$190.00
$26.52
$100.00
$300.00
$20.72
$28.10
$708.00
$354.00
$300.00
$501.82
$641.00
$399.50
$676.60
$71.40
$138.00
$39.95
$108.18
$202.20
$56.82
$373.46
$34.16
$275.00
$61.45
$158.69
$357.78
$447.00
$109.78
PAGE 11
TOTAL
$178.65
$128.40
$570.87
$1,032.80
$30.00
$75.00
$160.00
$190.00
$475.34
$1,062.00-
$801.82
$1,788.50
$138.00
$39.95
$108.18
$632.48
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
LYNN PEAVEY COMPANY
MARKL SUPPLY COMPANY
MINUTEMAN PRESS
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
MOTOR VEHICLE MANUF. ASSOC.
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE EXPLORER
NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION INS.
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
NOVAK & PARKER INC.
NUMBERS AUTOMATION INC
RAY O'HERRON CO., INC.
ORDER FROM HORDER
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
ERIC E. PIEE
PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
RICOH CORPORATION
JEFFREY SCHMITZ
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/16192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$48.00
SUPPLIES
$208.26
$1,700.12
EVIDENCE TECH CONTAINERS
$103.40
$103.40
SUPPLIES
$58.50
$58.50
TOW CARDS
$178.00
$178.00
TACTICAL UNIT CAR RENTAL
$200.00
$200.00
PUBLICATIONS
$23.00
$23.00
DONATION
$1,700.00
$1,700.00
TUITION-ROSCOP
$403.50
$403.50
TUITION-KERRIGAN%VIVERITO
$150.00
$150.00
TUITION-DALEYIKRUCHTEN
$130.00
$130.00
SEMINAR
$240.00
TUITIONS
$250.00
$490.00
SUPPLIES
$15.80
$15.80
30 VCR TAPES
$88.50
$88.50
REPAIRS
$105.33
$105.33
TIME-SAVER TEMPLATES
$48.36
EXPANDABLE BATONS
$991.50
$1,039.86
SUPPLIES
$44.54
SUPPLIES
$9.50
SUPPLIES
$39.60
SUPPLIES
$36.00
SUPPLIES
$17.94
$147.58
MISC EXPENSES
$15.00
MISC EXPENSES
$98.91
MISC EXPENSES
$53.10
MISC EXPENSES
$12.00
MISC EXPENSES
$19.06
MISC EXPENSES
$38.44
MISC EXPENSES
$21.72
EXPENSES
$13.63
EXPENSES
$212.88
$484.74*
RADIO REPAIRS
$673.50
$673.50
TUITION-RICHARDSON
$99.00
$99.00
FAXR120 MTCE AGREEMENT
$320.00
$320.00
EXPENSES
$84.18
$84.18
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
-PAYMENT DATE 4116/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION,
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SECRETARY OF STATE
SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATOR
SPEED -E -ARROW PRESS
SPRAY INSULATIONS, INC.
TRW CREDIT DATA DIVISION
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
INVOICE AMOUNT
LICENSE RENEWALS
$96.00
SUPPLIES
$240.46
SUPPLIES
$259.54
COURT JACKETS
$967.00
GUN RANGE INSULATION
$1,647.00
CD2030010855
$11.00
RADIO REPAIR
$39.00
APRIL MTCE SERVICE
$65.20
- ***TOTAL**
$23,939.25 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PAGE 13
voyv;1 t
$96.00
$500.00
$967.00
$1,647.00
$11.00
$39.00
$65.20
$25,586.25
$1,647.00
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
GASOLINE
$25.78
$25.78
DON ANDERSON
EXPENSES
$90.00
$90.00
ANSUL FIRE PROTECTION
SUPPLIES
$929.25
FREIGHT
X543.96
$973.21
APPLE COMPUTER INC
COMPUTER W/KEYBOARD
$2,259.30
$2,259.30
ARA/HUMAN FACTORS INC.
FfF COMBAT CHALLENGE
$125.00
$125.00
ARA EX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
LiINEN SERVICES
$56.65
LINEN SERVICES
$33.74
LINEN SERVICES
$44.00
$134.39
ARMSTRONG MEDICAL IND. INC.
SUPPLIES
$555.46
$555.46
BREATHING AIR SYSTEMS DIVISION
REPAIR AIR COMPRESSOR
$94.19
$94.19
BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, IN
SUBSCRIPTION
$520.00
$520.00
EDWARD CAVELLO
EXPENSES
$360.00
EXPENSES
$340.00
EXPENSES
$160.00
$860.00
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
070 0057060 0
$140.01
$140.01
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4116%92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
CHAIN O'LAKES ELEC.SUPP.CO.INC
SUPPLIES
$340.76
$340.76
CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC.
LABOR & MATERIALS
$102.12
$102.12
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BA77-JT-2404-A
$9.03
$9.03
COMPUTER SUPPORT CENTRES
CONSULTING SERVICES
$250.00
$250.00
COORDINATED BUSINESS SYS. LTD
SHARP COPIER
$1,162.00
COPIER SVCS RENDERED
$92.50
$1,254.50
W. S. DARLEY COMPANY
BREATHING APPARATUS
$3,750.00
BREATHING APPARATUS
$1,550.00
$5,300.00
FIRETAC SYSTEMS
10 SIGNS
$52.08
$52.08
JAMES FLORY - F.D.
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.00
GRAYARC GREENWOODS COLLECTION
BUSINESS CARDS
$154.25
$154.25
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
BUNKER COATS
$1,055.89
$1,055.89
HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$19.55
SUPPLIES
$94.13
SUPPLIES
$150.00
$263.68
ARTHUR L. HART, JR.
EXPENSES
$155.00
$155.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$192.14
SERVICE
$75.08
SERVICE
$400.00
SERVICE
$88.47
$755.69
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS SECR.ASSN
REGISTER HAJEKICAVELLO
$44.00
$44.00
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
REGISTER -HART
$125.00
PUBLICATIONS
$128.15
$253.15
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$11.03
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$49.00
$60.03
GARY KLEIN
ADVANCE EXPENSES
$779.00
$779.00
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
FLAMMABLE LIQUID STORAGE
$394.40
$394.40
M & R RADIATOR INC.
1 HEATER CORE
$43.44
$43.44
MAC WAREHOUSE
SOFTWARE
$1,790.00
$1,790.00
MAC'S FIRE AND SAFETY, INC.
SHIPPING CHGS
$21.49
SHIPPING CHGS
$15.95
CLOTHING
$5,040.00
$5,077.44
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
TONER
$172.38
$172.38
MOUNT PROSPECT LIONS CLUB
MEMBER DUES-CAVELLO
$35.00
$35.00
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
PARTS
$51.77
PARTS
$41.15
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
PARTS
$4.95
PARTS
$17.99
CREDIT
$28.00-
PARTS
$17.99
PARTS
$17.99
1 FLOOR JACK LIFT
$498.00
PARTS
$36.64
PARTS
$22.63
PARTS
$115.56
PARTS
$3.96
PARTS
$8.34
PARTS
$84.61
$893.58
NEW PIG CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$254.08
$254.08
NORTHWEST ASSOC. OF PROVIDER
DUES-DUMOVICH
$25.00
$25.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
9 IN-STATION VISITS
$882.00
$882.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$383.66
$383.66
OMEGA
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$718.80
$718.80
ORDER FROM HORDER
SUPPLIES
$249.40
SUPPLIES
$137.31
$386.71
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$17.50
MISC EXPENSES
$19.34
MISC EXPENSES
$13.00
MISC EXPENSES
$88.06
MISC EXPENSES
$15.74
$153.64*
PORT SUPPLY
UNDERWATER DATA SCOPE
$359.00
$359.00
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
3 DOZEN TOWELS
$72.00
$72.00
PROSPECT DIVE SHOP
REBUILD OXYGEN REGULATOR
$138.10
$138.10
R & R UNIFORMS INC.
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$146.85
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$5.95
$152.80
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SERVICE PARTS WASHERS
$69.50
$69.50
SCHMERLER FORD INC.
PATS
$62.20
PARTS
$122.52
$184.72
R. SCHMITT
6 BACK PACKS
$330.00
2 BLANKET BAGS
$11.00
$341.00
SCHWAB REHABILITAION CENTER
PHYSICAL CAPACITY EVALUATION
$325.00
$325.00
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
SHOP VACUUM
$99.99
$99.99
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
RITA ADAMCZYK
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DRIVER
PAGE 16
$3.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
WILL ASHLEY
FEB92
DRIVER
. PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
$12.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
$24.00
CHRIS BAIER
MARCH
SULLIVAN PRESS
BUSINESS CARDS/CERTIFICATE
$119.00
$119.00
DEL ULREICH
ADVANCED EXPENSES
$390.00.00
$ *
WRITING TOOLS GROUP
PUBLICATIONS
$63.50
$63
$63.50
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
REIMB
***TOTAL**
$30,181.26
GENERAL FUND
$22,366.82 CAP'IT'AL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
$7,814.44
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
RITA ADAMCZYK
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$3.00
$3.00
WILL ASHLEY
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
$24.00
CHRIS BAIER
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$15.00
$15.00
LEONARD W. BAZAN
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
HAZEL FRICKE
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
CAROLYN HENDERSON
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$9.00
MARCH
REIMB
$9.00
$18.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICERIVER
$400.00
SERVICE
$366.02
$436.02
LISA LEVIN
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$6.00
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$9.00
$15.03
RAY LUNDIN
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$33.00
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$21.00
$54.00
LINDA MARKAY
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
9
$9.00
$
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$9.00
$18.00
EARLE MATTSON
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$15.00
$15.00*
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$$12.00
$ 12.40
OTTO SCHERR
MARCH
DRIVER
REIMB
$
$12.40
$12.00
JEANNE SHERMAN
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
BERTHA STEIL
FEB92
DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
BROADACRE CONSULTING COMPANY
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
COMPUTERLAND
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO
MICHAEL J. MORAN
MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
THE PERFECT IMAGE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
QUALEX, INC.
REI TITLE SERVICES
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
XEROX CORP.
MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$41.90
PAGE 17
$4,333.92
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
WHITE XEROX PAPER
$13.82
$13.82
•PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
$176.00
$176.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
SERVICES RENDERED
$75.00
MARCH DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$24.00
KATHI WESLEY
FEB92 DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
SUPPLIES
$67.29
MARCH DRIVER REIMB
$15.00
$27.00
HELEN WHITLOCK
FEB92 DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
MISC EXPENSES
MARCH DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$21.00
VIRGINIA ZITO
FEB92 DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$39.04
$39.04
MARCH DRIVER REIMB
$18.00
$30.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
$1,333.33
***TOTAL**
$854.42
GENERAL FUND
$854.42
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
BROADACRE CONSULTING COMPANY
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
COMPUTERLAND
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO
MICHAEL J. MORAN
MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
THE PERFECT IMAGE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
QUALEX, INC.
REI TITLE SERVICES
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
XEROX CORP.
MEMBERSHIP DIRECTORY
$41.90
$41.90
CONSULTING SERVICES
$4,333.92
$4,333.92
WHITE XEROX PAPER
$13.82
$13.82
2 TONER CARTRIDGES
$176.00
$176.00
BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM
$2,555.56
$2,555.56
SERVICES. RENDERED
$75.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$75.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$230.00
$380.00
AIRFARE-CLEMENTS
$265.00
$265.00
SUPPLIES
$67.29
$67.29
PHOTO PROCESSING
$6.50
$6.50
EXPENSES
$5.00
MISC EXPENSES
$20.00
MISC EXPENSES
$3.91
-$28.91-
FILM
$39.04
$39.04
TITLE SEARCH
$75.00
$75.00
HEALTH CARE SERVICE
$1,333.33
$1,333.33
ANNUAL MAINTENANCE
$263.81
$263.81
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4116/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $9,580.08
GENERAL FUND $5,236.19 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $4,343.89
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
BLACK & DECKER
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
LOOP REPLACEMENT
PAINT
SUPPLIES
POSTERS
MTCE AGREEMENT
PARTS
PARTS
REPAIR HEDGE TRIMMER
REPAIR HEDGE TRIMMER
CREDIT
CREDIT
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
$173.48
$174.50
$4.30
$29.52
$1.98
$2.74
$3.69
$14.38
$6.74
$31.72
$2,592.00
$91.50
$10.70
$110.89
$147.00
$173.83
$65.91
$25.99
$25.99
$20.60-
$9.60-
$329.19
$20.88
$9.84
$33.48
$443.05
$2,592.00
$91.50
$10.70
$110.89
$147.00
$239.74
$51.98
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4116/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
PARTS
$208.73
PARTS
$165.85
$737.77
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
MICE SUPPLIES
$64.69
SUPPLIES
$131.03
SUPPLIES
$14.52
$210.24
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
REPAIRS
$63.50
$63.50
BUSHNELL, INCORPORATED
SUPPLIES
$33.77
CREDIT
$32.39 -
SUPPLIES
$75.12
$76.50
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$165.15
SUPPLIES
$165.15
SUPPLIES
$165.15
SUPPLIES
$165.15
SUPPLIES
$165.15
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$240.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$559.88
$1,626.13
CARDA PRODUCTS, INC.
CUTTING DIE
$75.00
$75.00
CENTURY TILE SUPPLY COMPANY
TILING SUPPLIES
$7.50
$7.50
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$24.46
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$408.00
$432.46
CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION
SUPPLIES
$100.00
MICE SUPPLIES
$60.57
MICE SUPPLIES
$42.56
$203.13
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
WATER USAGE
$83.48
$83.48
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
APRIL92 JANITORIAL SERVICE
$3,592.00
$3,592.00
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
SERVICE
$9,248.15
SERVICE
$7,311.33
$16,559.48
COOK COUNTY TREASURER
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$1,423.76
$1,423.76
R. L. CORTY & COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$158.00
$158.00
ELECTRO PAINTERS
PAINT WASHROOM PARTITIONS
$470.00
$470.00
ENGINEMASTERS, INC.
PARTS
$68.06
PARTS
$31.75
$99.81
TIM ERLER
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$48.38
$48.38
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
1 PRIORITY LETTER
$15.50
$15.50
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4116/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
$459.36
MARIO GAMBINO LANDSCAPING INC
CONTRACTUAL SODDING
$909.00
$909.00
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MICE
$1,232.00
REPAIR SIGNAL
$249.50
$1,481.50
HARRIS EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
$27.30
$27.30
HELLER LUMBER CO.
SUPPLIES
$92.47
SUPPLIES
$92.04
$184.51
HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$20.06
PARTS
$10.43
$30.49
HOYLE ROAD EQUIPMENT CO.
CHANNEL POSTS
$1,
$1,$50.00
ILLINOIS RANGE COMPANY
SS SPLASH SINK
$83.00
$83.00
$83.00
ITEC
REPAIRS$7,652.88
$7,652.88
NELS J. JOHNSON
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$4,245.00
$4,245.00
LAKE COUNTY C.E.S.
SUBSCRIPTION
$10.00
$10.00
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
LEAF MACHINE PARTS
$2,000.00
LEAF MACHINE PARTS
$510.31
CREDIT
$150.33-
$2,359.98
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$154.26
SUPPLIES
$32.46
SUPPLIES
$54.43
SUPPLIES
$5.85
SUPPLIES
$33.81
SUPPLIES
$48.55
SUPPLIES
$45.95
SUPPLIES
$65.60
SUPPLIES
$13.60
SUPPLIES
$7.85
SUPPLIES
$29.90
SUPPLIES
$19.59
$511.85
EARL MICH COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$218.78
$218.78
MJB TOOLS
TOOLS
$341.80
$341.80
MURRAY AND TRETTEL INC.
RAIN GUAGE CHARTS
$28.00
$28.00
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
2 TREE CITY USA SIGNS
$13.$0
2 TREE CITY USA SIGNS
$19.95
$33.75
NEON MATERIALS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$74.88
$74.88
NORLAB
TRACING DYE
$189.60
$189.60
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
P & W INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.
SUPPLIES
$40.61
$40.61
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$19,41
MISC EXPENSES
$21.75
$41.16*
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
EXPENSES
$16.48
EXPENSES
$35.42
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$43.50
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.60
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$94.18
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.03
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$68.29
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$55.61
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$5.80
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$15.20
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$37.73
$374.84*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$20.02
PARTS
$5.58
$25.60
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$19.47
PARTS
$126.58
PARTS
$70.80
$216.85
RAYCO
SIGN MATERIAL
$182.75
$182.75
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
TOOLS
$89,74
$89,74
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
TOOLS
$493.89
$493.89
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
$711.87
$711.87*
STATE TREASURER
MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$522.95
$522.95
JOEL STRZELCZYK
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO.
REPAIR SEAT
$68.50
$68.50
T&M SIGN SUPPLY INC.
SIGN MATERIAL
$70.00
$70.00
TECH SYN CORPORATION
PARTS
$22,70
PARTS
$1,92
2 LIGHT DUTY V -BELTS
$15.16
PARTS
$54.20
$93.98
D. K. TETER
S C SIDEWALK
$140.00
$140.00
RICHARD UGOLINI
R�IMB-SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO.
PARTS
$27.00
$27.00
WEARGUARD
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$74.36
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
$558.41
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
WESTERN ENGINE COMPANY
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
ZONICS, INC.
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT -PROSPECT PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$27.90
$881.25
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$20.92
$681.59
GASKETS
$70.42
$70.42
CLEAN & REPAIR RADIATOR
$62.00
$62.00
RIBBONS
$389.75
$389.75
$41,333.14 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
***TOTAL** $54,664.68
$13,331.54
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ABM, INC.
TYPEWRITER REPLACEMENT
$881.25
2 ADDING MACHINES
$338.00
SUPPLIES
$90.00
TYPEWRITER MICE
$297.00
$1,606.25
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
$62.21
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
$17.20
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
$67.00
$146.41
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$117.04
WIRE SET
$23.21
CREDIT
$22.23-
$118.02
ALLEN TESTPRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
$191.20
$191.20
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
PARTS
$9.75
$9.75
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
LABEL TAPE$19.95
$19.95
BADGER METER INC
2 COMPOUND METERS
$2,085.76
2 COMPOUND METERS
$3,450.00
METERS
$478.00
METERS
$3,931.60
METERS
$1,270.00
METERS
$3,200.60
$14,415.96
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
BORLAND INTERNATIONAL, INC
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
CAD DEVELOPMENT RESOURCES
CADE INDUSTRIES
CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION
CITRON CHEMICAL, INC.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
FRANK DELUCA
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
E & H UTILITY SALES
CON ERSKINE
G & K SERVICES
GALAXY INDUSTRIES, INC.
MARIO GAMBINO LANDSCAPING INC
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
GRUMMAN OLSON-STURGIS
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SOFTWARE
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
WATER PUMP
PROGRAM REVISION
CLEANING SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
BB72-JT-5608-D
BB72-JT-8548-A
POWER COSTS-JAWA
OPER MAINT COSTS-JAWA
VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
SERVICES RENDERED
2 FIRE HYDRANTS
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
DRILL BITS
DRILL BITS
HARVEST LANE SOD
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
SUPPLIES
2 ADAPTERS
MTCE SUPPLIES
WATER METER LABOR
WATER METER LABOR
WATER METER LABOR
WATER METER LABOR
WATER METER LABOR
$108.95
$42.19
$80.73
$22.72
$386.98
$208.73
$584.00
$25.00
$559.87
$247.05
$585.62
$141.78
$11.99
$10,937.00
$16,072.00
$106,572.00
$106,177.00
$50.00
$750.00
$1,704.78
$50.00
$153.12
$153.12
$153.12
$577.54
$575.21
$2,535.00
$39.00
$103.27
$155.10
$221.43
$428.22
$499.59
$428.22
$428.24
$428.22
PAGE 23
TOTAL
$108.95
$741.35
$584.00
$25.00
$559.87
$247.05
$585.62
$153.77
$239,758.00
$50.00
$750.00
$1,704.78
$50.00
$459.36
$1,152.75
$2,535.00
$39.00
$103.27
$155.10
$221.43
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE,DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER METER LABOR
$214.11
WATER METER LABOR
$285.48
METER TESTING
$70.00
WATER METER LABOR
$214.11
$2,996.19
HACH COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$102.50
$102.50
HARRIS EQUIPMENT
TIMER SOLENOIDl2 VALVES
$243.05
$243.05
HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$16.13
PARTS
$10.43
$26.56
I.B.M. CORPORATION
APRIL MTCE
$194.00
MTCE AGREEMENT
$115.37
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$52.00
$361.37
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$133.39
SERVICE
$31.06
SERVICE
$203.83 .
SERVICE
$533.12
SERVICE
$37.55
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
30.63
SERVICE
61.25
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$97.32
SERVICE
$18.76
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$17.17
SERVICE
$25.68
SERVICE
$48.97
$1,599.99
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE PHONE SYSTEM
$266.41
$266.41
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$79.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$154.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$559.00
$792.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$56.02
PARTS
$70.56
PARTS
$38.29
PARTS
$19.31
PARTS
$3.68
PARTS
$71.33
$259.19
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 25
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 416/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
DONALD LEHNERT
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$97.66
SUPPLIES
$30.22
SUPPLIES
$33.35
SUPPLIES
$23.56
$184.79
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$87.11
$87.11
LYONS EQUIPMENT CO.
10 SNOW PLOW PINS
$77.97
$77.97
M & R ELECTRONIC SYSTEMS, INC.
SERVICE PHONE SYSTEM
$127.50
$127.50
JERRY MCINTOSH
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$135.50
$135.50
MILWAUKEE ELECTRIC TOOL CORP.
MICE SUPPLIES
$3.53
MTCE SUPPLIES
$49.95
$53.48
MJB TOOLS
TOOLS
$341.80
$341.80
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
2 TREE CITY USA SIGNS
$19.10
$19.10
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA
$20.43
$20.43
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER
1 MOTOR MOUNT
$45.36
$45.36
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$104.60
$104.60
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
$60.00
PAPERDIRECT, INC.
PAPERKIT W/SELECTOR
$22.45
$22.45
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$.50
$.50*
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
EXPENSES
$2.72
EXPENSES
$120.00
EXPENSES
$16.28
EXPENSES
$1.59
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$.9B
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.87
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$45.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$4.08
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$59.70
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$10.50
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$29.57
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$56.55
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$24.44
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$9.18
$383.46*
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$529.47
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$521.82
$1,051.29*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$254.89
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$8.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$8.71
$272.58
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$32.66
PARTS
$23.42
PARTS
$23.42
PARTS
$23.42
PARTS
$152.94
PARTS
$18.81
$274.67
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
FILM & PROCESSING
$14.11
FILM & PROCESSING
$13.00
FILM & PROCESSING
$20.00
FILM PROCESSING
$6.73
$53.84
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
SUPPLIES
$283.98
$283.98
SCOTT RILEY
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
DAVID RISTOW
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$48.04
$48.04
ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO.
1 CONE
$111.00
$111.00
SAUBER MFG. CO.
ALUMINUM MATERIAL BASKET
$350.00
$350.00
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
CURB BOX LID LOCKERS
$52.48
$52.48
SOUND INCORPORATED
SECURITY MONITOR
$92.20
$92.20
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
SUPPLIES
$31.44
$31.44
P. R. STREICH & SONS, INC.
SUPPLIES
$166.06
$166.06
SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO.
REPLACE REAR WINDOW GLASS
$107.85
CREDIT
$5.80-
$102.05
SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION
QUICKLOK HUB NUT
$163.81
$163.81
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$294.31
SUPPLIES
$14.30
SUPPLIES
$56.51
SUPPLIES
$183.55
$548.67
TIME MARK CORPORATION
2 MONITORS
$161.52
$161.52
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
BATTERY
$70.00
$70.00
WEARGUARD
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$74.36
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
$558.41
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$27.89
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$20.92
$681.58
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WILKENS-ANDERSON CO.
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
• PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
LEAKDETECTOR SUPPLIES
WATER & SEWER FUND $279,878.46
PAGE 27
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$165.90
$279.20 $445.10
$15.00 $15.00
***TOTAL** $279,878.46
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C MARCH LAND LEASE $1,383.10 $1,383.10
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 19 NORTHWEST HWY $167.08 $167.08
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,550.18
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $1,550.18
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY MARCH COLLECTIONS $105,524.15
MARCH COLLECTIONS $45,252.01
MARCH COLLECTIONS $24,898.39 $175,674.55
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL**
$175,674.55
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $175,674.55
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINISHMASTER, INC.
HELLER LUMBER CO.
A. J. MAGGIO CO.
MONTGOMERY WARD & CO.
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
SPRAY INSULATIONS, INC.
BARRY A. SPRINGER
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
MARCH92 SUPPLIES
BH66-JT-5388-C
SERVICES RENDERED
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
CONSTRUCTION SAFETY BLDG
GAS RANGE
SERVICE CALL
TOOLS
TOOLS
GUN RANGE INSULATION
LEGAL SERVICES
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$136.97
$389.51
$17,395.26
$191.93
$124.83
$123.20
$131.78
$24.58
$219,799.00
$229.00
$95.00
$124.99
$124.99
$2,303.00
$135.00
$75.31
***TOTAL**
PAGE 28
TOTAL
$136.97
$389.51
$17,395.26
$571.74
$24.58
$219,799.00
$229.00
$95.00
$249.98
$2,303.00
$135.00
$75.31*
$241,404.35
$821.72 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $3,253.37
$237,194.26 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $135.00
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC FLAG POLE PARTS $500.00
FLAG POLE PARTS $250.00
FLAG POLE PARTS $400.00
FLAG POLE PARTS $76.00
75TH ANNIVERSARY BANNERS $337.50 $1,563.50
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $1,563.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 29
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 4/16/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $1,563.50
********************************************************************************************************
DEBT SERVICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLOOD LOAN INT 4/1%92 $217.83
FLOOD LOAN PRIN 4/ /92
FLOOD LOAN INT 5 1 992
FLOOD LOAN PRIN 5/092
DEBT SERVICE
GENERAL FUND $7,287.46
PENSIONS
$3,425.90
$185.11
$3,458.62 $7,287.46
***TOTAL** $7,287.46
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $200.00
CHARLES W. NICK APRIL 92 PENSION $883.22 $883.22
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MAY MEDICAL INSURANCE $510.00 $510.00
PAUL H. WATKINS APRIL DISABILITY BENEFIT $1,456.83 $1,456.83
PENSIONS ***TOTAL**
$3,054.05
GENERAL FUND
$883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $2,550,254.00
DATE RUN 4/16/92 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 30
TIME RUN 11.13.26 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 4/16/92
NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT
1 GENERAL FUND $1,136,529.78
21 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $397,354.62
22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $13,331.54
23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $6,527.65
24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $147,663.21
31 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83
41 WATER & SEWER FUND $411,894.05
46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $5 177.08
48 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 821.72
49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $114,329.97
51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $17,514.81
53 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $237,194.26
56 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $135.00
60 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 $15,000.00
73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $9,676.33
74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $34,937.15
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $2,550,254.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
March 1, 1992 - March 31, 1992
Fund
Revenues
Expenses
Fund
Balance
for
for
Balance
Feb 29, 1992
March 1992
March 1992
March 31.1992
General and Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,729,929
$2,340,773
$1,094,775
$ 2,975,927
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
582,622
89,462
29,484
642,600
Community Development Block Grant
113,587
41,121
12,187
142,521
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
< 129,358>
302,223
54,903
117,962
Refuse Disposal Fund
< 373,566>
810,387
190,874
245,947
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,762,941
1,012,801
512,472
4,263,270
Parking System Revenue Fund
189,219
16,082
6,291
199,010
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,268,045
203,936
113,202
1,358,779
Vehicle Replacement Fund
433,317
2,504
-
435,821
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,353,344
229,215
25,725
1,556,834
Downtown Redev. Const. Funds
556,051
3,272
2,206
557,117
Police & Fire Building Construction
5,603,894
30,553
215,641
5,418,806
Flood Control Const. Fund
4,741,741
210,234
174,388
4,777,587
Debt Service Funds
882,284
314,720
-
1,197,004
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust
-
-
-
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
-
-
-
-
Police Pension Fund
17,127,267
280,997
107,683
17,300,581
Firemen's Pension Fund
19,105,932
228,949
122,108
19,212,773
Benefit Trust Funds
250.049
1,472
2.167
249.354
557.197,298
$6.118.701
$2.664,106
$60,651.893
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
REFUSE DISPOSA
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
TAX REVENUE
10,559,300.00
8,903,777.79
1,655,522.21
15.67
FEE REVENUE
1,731,100.00
1,743,538.46
12,438.46-
.71 -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
2,056,000.00
2,016,046.23
39,953.77
1.94
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
356,100.00
326,%5.62
29,134.38
8.18
FINES AND FORFEITS
370,600.00
280,838.16
89,761.84
24,22
OTHER REVENUE
791,650.00
763,6725327,977�47
3.53
FUND TOTALS
15,864,750.00
14,034 8838,79
1.824,911.21
11.53 %
REFUSE DISPOSA
TAX REVENUE
1,754,550.00
1,776,565.72
22,015.72-
1.25 -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
130,500.00
70,208.52
60,291.48
46.20
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
636,000.00
438,547.65
197,452.35
31.04
OTHER REVENUE
.00
466.65
466.65-
.00
FUND TOTALS _M2,tO50 QQ_ 2.285.788,54 235 261,46 9.33 X
MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,150,000.00 1,001,844.27 148,155.73 12.88
OTHER REVENUE 55„300.00 40,039.15 jLjNO.A5- 27.59
FUND TOTALS 1,205,300.00 1aQA1,883=4._ 163,416.58 13.55 X
COMMUNITY T
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 305,130.00 336,996.00 31,866.00- 10.44 -
OTHER REVENUE _ 2,,-QW.O,Q 40,259.14 20.259,14,- _101.29 -
FUND TOTALS '295,130.00 377,255,14 - 5 ,,1 A-- 16.03-X
MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE 695,775.00 702,928.77 7,153.77- 1.02 -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 50,000.00 28,519.62 21,480.38 42.96
OTHER REVENUE 2.5QO 00 1.898.00 602;QYQ 24.08
FUND TOTALS 748,275.00 733,346,39 14,928.61 1.99 X
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
BENEFIT TRUST #2 AMOUNT RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE 20,000.00 16,846.45 3,153.55 15.76
FUND TOTALS 20,000.00 1 15.76 %
LIBRARY FUND
TAX REVENUE 2,123,655.00 »00 2,123,655.00 100.00
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 78,500.00 .00 78,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 621,5&00 .00 621..500.,.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2,023,655.00 COQ M&655,00 100.00 X
WATER . SEWER FUND
TAX REVENUE
1,373,050.00
1,651,390.86
278,340.86-
20.27 -
FEE REVENUE
15,000.00
10,265.32
4,734.68
31,56
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
4,440,000.00
4,125,249.51
314,750,49
7.08
OTHER REVENUE
411.150.00
320.479.22
- 90,,670.70
22.05
FUND TOTALS 6,239,200.00, 6,107,,384,91 131,815.09 2.11 %
PARKING REVENUE
FEE REVENUE 2,880.00 2,880.00 .00 .00
PARKING REVENUE 171,500.00 160,783.85 10,716.15 6.24
OTHER REVENUE 10,00100 8,749„¢8 1.2501 12.50
FUND TOTALS 1,84, 380.00.. ..172., 413..53 11.966.47 6.49 X
VEHICLE R T FUND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 581,900.00 581,900.00 ,00 .00
OTHER REVENUE 63,000..00_ 56,63,9 „ 6,36771 10.10
FUND TOTALS 644,900.00 638 532.29 6,36731 .98 %
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
CAPITACAPIT6L IMPROVEMENTFUND
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
1,892,550.00
1,822,150.00
70,400.00
3.71
OTHER REVENUE
382.600.00
421,276.04
38,676,04-
10.10 -
FUND TOTALS
9,275.150,00_
2,243,,426.04
31,7M96
1.39 %
CAPITACAPIT6L IMPROVEMENTFUND
OTHER REVENUE
TAX REVENUE
403,750.00
408,582.81
4,832.81-
1.19 -
FEE REVENUE
40,000.00
15,271.33
24,728.67
61.82
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
865,000.00
706,735.84
158,264.16
18.29
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
250,000.00
250,000.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
1515,9W,00
'1„,„ 4475M68
332,5M68--
21.95 -
FUND TOTALS
3.073,750,00
3.228.16�6.66
154,416.66-
5.02-X
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
OTHER REVENUE
135,000.00
153.641.90
18,641.90- 13.80 -
FUND TOTALS
135,00OX0
153,x64,1, 90
18,041.9(- 13.80-%
P2QCE & FT 9 BOND PROCEEDS
OTHER REVENUE 4,100,000.00 4,192.463,97 9 2.25 -
FUND TOTALS 4,100,000.00 4,192,463,97 W.463.97- 2.25-%
QQWN
TOWN R NT T 1995
FEE REVENUE 13,500.00 16,675.00 31175,00- 23.51 -
OTHER REVENUE M ___& 9n, 6,923.42- .00
FUND TOTALS 13,500,00 _ 23,598.42 10.098.42- 74.80-X
WNTOWN REPEV6EMT CONST 1991
OTHER REVENUE
1.025,000.00
537.129.94
487.870.06 47.59
FUND TOTALS
1,92�519m,00
537,129,94
4Z.870.Qk_ 47.59 X
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 $ P E C T
8 U D 6 E T R E V E M U E $ U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1992 AMOUNT RECEIVED- BALANCE BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE .00 224,886.85 9?4,886.85- .00
FUND TOTALS 00 224,886.85 224 886.85 00 %
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
TAX REVENUE 450,000.00 190,334.77 259,665.23 57.70
OTHER REVENUE aMol000loo, -ilQQM8-9QjQL W890.03- 2.03 -
FUND TOTALS 3.400
.000.00 3,200..224.80 199,775.20 5.87 %
FL -000 CONTROL C.ONS.T FUND 1992,
OTHER REVENUE 2,775,000.00 2,798,775.83 23,775.83- .85 -
FUND TOTALS 2,775,000.00 2,798,775.83 23,775,43- .854
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 127_3
TAX REVENUE
TAX REVENUE
154,200.00
155,906.75
1,706.75-
1.10 -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
5,400.00
4,750.00
650.00
12.03
OTHER REVENUE
10.000.00
_B491.02
__1508.98
15.08
FUND TOTALS
169,600.00
169,147.77
452,23
.26 %
CogULATE PURPOSES 0 & 1 1974
TAX REVENUE
232,950.00
235,231.58
2,281.58- .97 -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
8,000.00
6,700.00
1,300.00 16.25
OTHER REVENUE
17,000,00
1,,x__06944
3-930.56 23.12
FUND TOTALS
257,950,00
255,001.02
2,948.98 1.14 %
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS 0 & I
TAX REVENUE 19,700.00 19,467.94 232,06 1.17
OTHER REVENUE 21500-00 2,201.16 298.84 11.95
FUND TOTALS 22.&0Q.00 21,669,10 530,90 2.39 %
V
I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P
E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N
U E S U M M A R
Y
5/01/91 -
3/31/92
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
SSA #2 BLACKHAWK 8 & I
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
TAX REVENUE
19,950.00
19,797.32
152.68
.76
OTHER REVENUE
i X
2,237,80
762,20
25.40
FUND TOTALS
22,950,00
22.035.12
914.88
3.98 X
POLICE & FIRE BLDG 8 & I 1991A
TAX REVENUE 200,000.00 200,010.00 10,00- .00
OTHER REVENUE _ IIS 21,443,82 19,943.8?,329.58-
FUND TOTALS 2011500,00 221.4,53,8„2 19.953.82- 9.90-X
DOWNTOWN REDEYLPMT 0 & 1 19918
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 49,000.00 15,999.24 33,000.76 67.34
OTHER REVENUE --- ,00 2.524.07.. 7,,,524..07- .00
FUND TOTALS 49,000,00 18,523,31 30,476,69 62.19 %
INSURANCE RESEV B & 1 1987
OTHER REVENUE 1.000„00, 1`157,.59 157.59- 15.75 -
FUND TOTALS 1,000.00 1.157,59 157,59- 15.754
1991A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 90,500,00 87,867.31 2,632.69 2.90
OTHER REVENUE .DO 13,2§zQ,A13,217,91- .00
FUND TOTALS 21599,00 101 854.39 11,354,39- 12.54-X
DOWNTOUN R V %T & 1987D
TAX REVENUE 115,000.00 183,851.93 68,851.93- 59.87 -
OTHER REVENUE 5.gm,00 - 7,,364,40 2.364,40- 47.28 -
FUND TOTALS120
DO
191,7,,1¢,;,,3,,,3,,%,1216.33- 59.34-X
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1987C
TAX REVENUE 119,500.00 119,642.55 142.55- .11 -
OTHER REVENUE 145.00 2.45 142.55 98.31
FUND TOTALS 119,645.00 1100 00 .00 X
POLJCR PEN ION FUND
TAX REVENUE 76,500.00 62,861.71 13,638.29 17.82
OTHER REVENUE 1.948„500,00 2,084,504.36 136 6.97 -
FUND TOTALS �25,000,0,g_ 2.147,366.07 122.366.07- 6.04-%
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
P W FACILITY B & 119878
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
TAX REVENUE
371,550.00
375,829.99
4,279.99-
1.15 -
OTHER REVENUE
25,000.00
21,275.7? 5..72
3,724.28
14.89
FUND TOTALS
396.550.00
397.105.71
555.71-
14-%
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1987C
TAX REVENUE 119,500.00 119,642.55 142.55- .11 -
OTHER REVENUE 145.00 2.45 142.55 98.31
FUND TOTALS 119,645.00 1100 00 .00 X
POLJCR PEN ION FUND
TAX REVENUE 76,500.00 62,861.71 13,638.29 17.82
OTHER REVENUE 1.948„500,00 2,084,504.36 136 6.97 -
FUND TOTALS �25,000,0,g_ 2.147,366.07 122.366.07- 6.04-%
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
TAX REVENUE
25,500.00
13,674.62
11,825.38 46.37
OTHER REVENUE
211811900.00
2.217.052.96
35,1.52..96- 1.61 -
FUND TOTALS
2,207,400.00
2,,,2,30,7,27;5
23.327.58- 1.05-%
1
OTHER REVENUE .00 3,"11.3,0, 3,991.30- .00
FUND TOTALS Q0 3,991,30 3,991.30- .00 X
FLOOD CONTROL B & I 1
OTHER REVENUE D 6,672,02 6,672.02- .00
FUND TOTALS .00 6.672.02 61�ij72.02- 00 X
V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMI 0 & 1 19928 41VUNT RECEIVED-- BALANCE BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE -----.1_361 5 - 536,15- DO
FUND TOTALS OQ 536.15 536.15- .00 %
$$A #6 GEOR E/ALSERT 0 A I
TAX REVENUE 32,200.00 32,383.46 183.46- .56 -
OTHER REVENUE 1 921.07 578.93 38.59
FUND TOTALS 33,700.00 33,304.53 3W47 1.17 %
TOTALS ALL FUNDS
53,091,035.00
47,952,010.68
5,139,024.32
9.67 Z
LESS TRANSFERS
389,500,00-353.8
6
.6-55
-633.45
9.14 Z
TOTAL REVENUES
52,701,535.00
47,5981WI�
5,10 87
9.68 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N 0 1 T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
011 VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
71,150.00
61,800.13
9,349.87
13.14
ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION
3mo-gg
822,76
2,177.24
72.57
PROGRAM TOTALS
74,159.00-
62_622. 89
11,5?7.11
15.54 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
21,450.00
19,577.65
1,872.35 8.72
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
46,450.00
36,409.41
10,040.59 21.61
COMMODITIES
6,250-00
6,635J3
385,03- 6.17 -
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 74,150,00 &622,89 11,527JI 15.54 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 71,700.00 60,462.11 11,237.89 15.67
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 2,450.00 2,.160,78 289,22 11.80
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALSkj5A,996-
--- L -Z,,622.89 11,527,11 15.54 %
V I L L A G E 0 F N 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
021 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
EXPWITURE CLAS§IFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PR RACLAS11FICATION
AMOUNT
Expexoto
BALANCE
B A L
_,AHCZ
VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION
222,525.00
201,798.91
20,726.09
9.31
LEGAL SERVICES
157,500.00
128,752.34
28,747.66
18.25
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT & TRAININ
84,05K)L00
74,393.78
9,696.22
11.53
PROGRAM TOTALS
464,115.00
404,945.03
59J69.97
12.74 %
EXPWITURE CLAS§IFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
244,195.00
220,995.59
23,199.41
9.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
216,020.00
181,026.90
34,993.10
16.19
COMMODITIES
3,400.OD
1,922.54
1,477.46
43.45
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
500.00
11000,00,
500.00-
100.00'
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 404,115.00 X04,945.03 59,169.97 12.74 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 427,475.00 371,411.36 56,063.64 13.11
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 36,640.00 33,533.67 3,106.33 8.47
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 464.113.0D 404,945.03 404,945.03 59,169.97 12.74 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
6 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
022 COMMUNICATION DIVISION
,EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGETAMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EIPIIIEO
BALANCE
BALANCE LAN E
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
173,445.00
132,577.36
40,867.64
23.56
VILLAGE TELEPHONE SYSTEM
41J50.00
33.991.39
7,758.61
18.58
PROGRAM TOTALS
215,125,Qg-
166.568.75
48.§g6,25
22.59 %
,EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
113,875.00
91,620.46
22,254.54
19.54
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
70,620.00
58,020.04
12,599.96
17.84
COMMODITIES
13,000.00
6,809.15
6,190.85
47.62
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
17,700.00
10,119.10
7,580,90
42.82
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 215,195.00 56
- 175_ __0_62§. 25 22.59 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 215,195= 166,568.75 40,626.25 22.59
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 215,195.00 __166_5&75 48_62,6,25 22.59 %
�V I L L A 6 E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
031 FINANCE DEPARTMENT
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
FINANCE ADMINISTRATION
244,580.00
220,485.82
24,094,18
9.85
ACCOUNTING
91,935.00
85,092.64
6,842.36
7.44
PURCHASING
26,100.00
22,831.57
3,268.43
12.52
DATA PROCESSING
109,205.00
90,542.05
18,662.95
17.08
DUPLICATING SERVICES
35,000.00
30,099.45
4,900.55
14.00
INSURANCE PROGRAM
240,865.00
237,490.43
3,374.57
1.40
CUSTOMER SERVICES
161,010.00
140,175.21
20,834.79
12.94
CASH MANAGEMENT
24.805.00
22�
2,671 05
10.76
PROGRAM TOTALS
933,500.00
848
84,648,88
9.06 X
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
517,320.00
466,641.66
50,678.34
9.79
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
380,180.00
352,649.35
27,530.65
7.24
COMMODITIES
30,000.00
24,217.11
5,782.89
19.27
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
,......6.000,.00
5.343.00
657.00
10.95
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 933 500.00 84�? 84� 9,06 %
SOURCEN
GENERAL FUND 853,340.00 775,914.49 77,425.51 9.07
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 80.160.00. M936.63 7,,223.37 9.01
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 933 $48.85,1, $4,648,08, 9.06 X
V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
032 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
115,435.00
105,250.90
10,184.10
8.82
VILLAGE NEWSLETTER
38,500.00
38,322.60,
177.40
.46
PROGRAM TOTALS
153,935.0()
143,573,50
10,361J0
6.73 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
75,385.00
69,428.63
5,956.37 7.90
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
70,550.00
65,249.79
5,300.21 7.51
COMMODITIES
8,000.008
895.08
895.08- 11.18 -
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 153.935,00 143,573.50 10,361.50 6.73 Z
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 141,965.00 132,590.40 9,374.60 6.60
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 11,970.00 10,983.10 986,90 8.24
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 153 935.00 143,373.50 10.361.50 6.73 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E 5 U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
035 RISK MANAGEMENT
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2,3000000.00
1,970,527J7
329.472.83
14.32
PROGRAM TOTALS 2,300,000.00
t97Q,S
. 27.17
322,472.83
14.32 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,300,000.00
1,970,527.17
329,472.83 14.32
EXPENDITURE TOTALS
2,300,000.00
1,970,527.17
329,472,83 14.32 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
2,300,000.00
1,970,527,17
329,472.83 14.32
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS
2,300,000.00
1,970,527.17
329,472.83 14.32 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
037 INSPECTION SERVICES
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
BUILDING CODE SERVICES
425,955.00
366,294.24
59,660.76
14.00
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
146,120.00
120,397.55
25,722.45
17.60
ENGINEERING SERVICES
456.525.00
395,947.18
&577.82
13.26
PROGRAM TOTALS
1,028.600.00
02,638.97
_ 145,961,03
14.19 X
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
811,150.00
713,326.13
97,823.87
12.05
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
184,450.00
155,621.26
28,828.74
15.62
COMMODITIES
15,500.00
10,014.12
5,485.88
35.39
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
17�
3.677,46
13.822.54
78.98
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 1.028.600.00 882,638.97 145,961.03 14.19 %
OURCE OF FUNQS
GENERAL FUND 889,210.00 758,797.96 130,412.04 14.66
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 16,000.00 11,936.50 4,063.50 25.39
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 123.390.00 111,904.51 11.485.49 9.30
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 1 2j8,OQ,,QO 882,638.97 145,961.033 14.19 X
V I L L A G S 0 F N 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
041 POLICE DEPARTMENT
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
POLICE ADMINISTRATION
1,202,510.00
1,118,479.72
94,030.28
6.98
PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
3,121,075.00
2,817,759.15
303,315.85
9.71
CRIME PREVENTION & PUBLIC SERV
142,765.00
121,197.22
21,567.78
15.10
INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PRO
626,260.00
561,499.67
64,760.33
10.34
CROSSING GUARDS
48,250.00
35,523.05
12,726.95
26.37
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERAT
429.350.gg
385,358,82....0,991.18
ID.24
PROGRAM TOTALS
5,57MI0,00
5,039,817.63
530,392.37
9.52 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
FUNDS
PERSONAL SERVICES
4,445,310.00
3,978,385.54
466,924.46
10.50
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
896,500.00
874,175.78
22,324.22
2.49
COMMODITIES
171,200.00
137,786.91
33,413.09
19.51
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
57,200.00
49,469.40
7,730.60
13.51
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 5,570.210,00 5,039,817.63 530.392.37 9.52 %
§OURCE OF
FUNDS
GENERAL
FUND
4,997,840.00
4,484,316.63
513,523.37
10.27
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
112,470.00
97,530.42
14,939.58
13.28
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND
171,400.00
169,470.58
1,929.42
1.12
POLICE
PENSION FUND
288,500.00
288,500,00
.00
.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 5,570,210,00 5,039,817.63 530,392.37 9.52 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
042 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM
CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
FIRE
ADMINISTRATION
937,050.00
877,876.52
59,173.48
6.31
FIRE
DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS
3,349,735.00
3,013,448.52
336,286.48
10.03
FIRE
TRAINING ACADEMY
29,490.00
21,418.39
8,071.61
27.37
FIRE
PREVENTION
283,975.00
236,112.00
47,863.00
16.85
FIRE
COMMUNICATIONS
52,460.00
40,085.70
12,374.30
23.58
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERAT
275,705.00
259,453.85
16,251.15
5.89
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
18,350.00
16,279,16
2.070.84
11.28
PROGRAM TOTALS
4,946,765,00
4,464,674,14
4824D90.86
9.74 Z
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
4,009,015.00
3,578,626.42
430,398.58
10.73
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
728,490.00
6%,390.83
32,099.17
4.40
COMMODITIES
108,235.00
99,474.52
8,760.48
8.09
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
101,025=
90,182.37
10,842,63
10.73
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 4,946,765.00 4,464,674J4 482,090.86 9.74 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
4,362,970.00
3,898,536.04
464,433.96
10.64
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
44,310.00
39,144.53
5,165.47
11.65
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
179,585.00
167,093.57
12,491.43
6.95
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
359.900L00
359,900,OO
Op
.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 4,946,765.00 4,464,674.14 482,090.86 9.74 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
043 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
PENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 328,925.00 328,92D.00 5.00 .00
COMMODITIES .Do- 1.095.24 1,09„5..24- .DO
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 328.925.00 330,015.24 1,090.24- .33-%
SOURCE FUND
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
8ALANCE
POLICE i FIRE DISPATCH SERVICE
328.925.00
330,015.24
1 a.24-
33 -
PROGRAM TOTALS
328,9„9,5.00
3330,915.44
1.090.24-
.33-%
PENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 328,925.00 328,92D.00 5.00 .00
COMMODITIES .Do- 1.095.24 1,09„5..24- .DO
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 328.925.00 330,015.24 1,090.24- .33-%
SOURCE FUND
GENERAL FUND 328.925.00
-33{x,015.24
1,M 24
33 -
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 32$,925.00
330,Q155.Zi
1.090.24-
.334
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
052 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
INFORMATION, REFERRAL, & COUNS
191,160.00
185,104.26
6,055.74
3.16
RECREATION AND EDUCATION
18,440.00
16,730.15
1,709.85
9.27
HOMEBOUND SERVICES
84,510.00
63,911.71
20,598.29
24.37
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
49,615.00
35,750.97
13,864.03
27.94
BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM
4,255.00
3,104.85
1,150.15
27.03
SOCIAL AGENCIES
16,500.00
17,050.00
550.00
3.33-
.33PROGRAM
PROGRAMTOTALS
364,480.00
321,651.94
42,828.D6
11.75 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
276,320.00
239,853.25
36,466.75
13.19
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
77,810.00
72,672.62
5,137.38
6.60
COMMODITIES
5,500.00
4,391.48
1,108.52
20.15
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
4,850.00
X734,59
115,41
2.37
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 364,480.00 321,651.94 42,828.06 11.75 %
SOURCE OFF
GENERAL FUND 321,935.00 283,249.56 38,685.44 12.01
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 42,545_00 38,4(�2,38 4,14262 9.73
_ _Q
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 364,400.00 121,651.24 42,828.06 11.75 %
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
062 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
EXPEND11URE CLASSIFtCATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAMT
288,565.00
EXPENDED
I&WE
BALANCE
PLANNING, ZONING, S ADMINISTRA
214,795.00
175,646.53
39,148.47
18.22
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
90,300.00
60,774.98
29,525.02
32.69
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLANNIN
13,440.00
27,702.79
14,262.79-
106.12-
CDBG ADMINISTRATION
51,130.00
36,740.78
14,389.22
28.14
CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
39,000.00
39,002.12
2.12-
.DO
CDBG ACCESSIBILITY i NEIGHBORH
60,000.00
.00
60,000.00
100.00
CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATIO
125,100.00
108,791.80
16,308.20
13.03
CDBG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION
39,900.00
131.86
39,768.14
99.66
CDBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITATI
10,ODO.OD_.
'1,226.47
8,773.53
87.73
PROGRAM TOTALS
/643.665,00
45Q,Q17.33
193.647,67
30.08 X
EXPEND11URE CLASSIFtCATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
288,565.00
243,963.62
44,601.38
15.45
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
122,750.00
92,398.98
30,351.02
24.72
COMMODITIES
4,350.00
1,791.42
2,558.58
58.81
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2228,000,0_0
111,663.31
1166336.69
50.93
EXPENDITURE TOTALS _43,,665.00_ _, 45oM7_33, .....193 647.67.. 30.08 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 281,850.00 231,782.99 50,067.01 17.76
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT 325,130.00 185,893.03 139,236.97 42.82
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 36.685.00 32.341.31 4,343,69, 11.84
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS _ 643,665,00 450,017'.33 _193,,647.67 30.08 X
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
071 STREET DIVISION
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET •
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
STREET DIVISION ADMIN & SUPPOR
683,445.00
622,091.53
61,353.47
8.97
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDING
379,565.00
322,630.38
56,934.62
14.99
MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
167,300.00
163,854.81
3,445.19
2.05
STREET MAINTENANCE
1,746,295.00
1,318,953.10
427,341.90
24.47
SNOW REMOVAL
215,570.00
157,255.65
58,314.35
27.05
LEAF REMOVAL
83,985.00
85,850.69
1,865.69-
2.22 -
STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENA
130,305.00
112,884.39
17,420.61
13.36
FORESTRY
402,465.00
315,751.48
86,713.52
21.54
TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE
81,015.00
63,294.91
17,720.09
21.87
PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION
36,300.00
28,577.96
7,722.04
21.27
MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS
50,605.00
24,267.14
26,337.86
52.04
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
430,185.00
398,820.26
31,364.74
7.29
POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
22,725.00
21,889.97
835.03
3.67
TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIGHT
307,125.00
252.792 10
54,332.90
17.69
PROGRAM TOTALS
4.736,885.00
3,888,914.3748
7.970,;,63
17.90 X
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,496,435.00
1,298,387.34
198,047.66
13.23
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,106,400.00
960,599.41
145,800.59
13.17
COMMODITIES
467,350.00
384,604.60
82,745.40
17.70
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1,666,700,00
1 2�4i 373.02
421
25.28
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 4..736.885..00. 3,888.91.4.37 847,970.63 17.90 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
2,872,425.00
2,385,000.66
487,424.34
16.96
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
1,399,000.00
1,064,211.60
334,788.40
23.93
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
230,460.00
207,324.84
23,135.16
10.03
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
235m.00
232
2,622.73
1.11
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 4.736,885.00 3.888,914.37 847 17.90 X
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
072 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
EXPENDITURE N
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
WATER & SEWER DIV ADMIN & SUPP
1,620,445.00
1,557,264.63
63,180.37
3.89
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDING
61,425.00
48,422.86
13,002.14
21.16
MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
49,985.00
37,980.35
12,004.65
24.01
WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE & REP
264,255.00
199,399.06
64,855.94
24.54
WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. & RE
337,520.00
252,660.81
84,859.19
25.14
WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT,
137,125.00
104,335.39
32,789.61
23.91
WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.& REPL
206,135.00
168,382.69
37,752.31
18.31
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERAT
357,720.00
317,657.04
40,062.96
11.19
SANITARY SEWER MAINT. & REPAIR
115,070.00
126,202.29
11,132.29-
9.67 -
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
215,000.00
205,665.06
9,334.94
4.34
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
100,000.00
93,477.00
6,523.00
6.52
LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITIO
3,087.750.00
2.576,090.00
-„15 1,,660,00
16.57
PROGRAM TOTALS
6.552.430.00
5.687.537.18
064-092.82,
13.19 %
EXPENDITURE N
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,216,980.00
1,045,086.82
171,893.18
14.12
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,948,700.00
3,397,638.23
551,061.77
13.95
COMMODITIES
351,100.00
273,532.51
77,567.49
22.09
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
444,900,00
380,986.07
63,913.93
14.36
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
„590,750.00
5,901293.55
456.45_
.07
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 6.552,430.00 X53, 7.18 864.892.82 13.19 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
WATER & SEWER FUND 6,552,430,00_ 5,687,537.18 864.82 13.19
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 6.552,430,00 5,M7j37jB_ 864,892.82 13.19 X
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
073 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
PARKING DIVISION ADMIN & SUPPO
60,375.00
56,123.14
4,251.86
7.04
PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE
157,610.00
112,906.43
44,703.57
28.36
PROGRAM TOTALS
217,985.00
169,029.57
48,955,43
22.45 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
22,885.00
19,960.56
2,924.44
12.77
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
54,650.00
47,688.44
6,961.56
12.73
COMMODITIES
5,800.00
2,530.57
3,269.43
56.36
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
134,650,00
981850�00
35,800.00
26.58
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 217,985.00 169,029J7 48,95$,43 22.45 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 217,9Moo 169,029,57 48,955.43 22.45
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 217,985.00 169,029.57 48,955.43 22.45 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
075 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 2,,403,035.00 2,039A41,42 _ 363193.58 15.11
PROGRAM TOTALS 2,403.035.00 ?,,039.841.42 363.19, 15.11 X
EXPEND TU RE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
56,885.00
52,093.46 4,791.54
8.42
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,254,200.00
1,891,599.20 362,600.80
16.08
COMMODITIES
91,950.00
92,173.76 223.76-
.24 -
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
___..DD
3,,-975.00. '„3,,,9„75.00-,
.00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2,403.035.00 2,039,841.42 363,193.58 15.11 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 2.4Q3,03,00_ 2,039,,841,42 ,1,93.58 15.11
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2.403.035.00 2.,039,841,42_ 363.193.58 15.11 X
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
077 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENRED
BALANCE
BALANCE
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRU
887,000.00
87,462.09
799,537.91
90.13
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS
2,961,650.00
1,707,857.13
1,253,792.87
42.33
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
34,800.00
82,673.87
47,873.87-
137.56-
POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONSTRUCT
4,650,000.00
5,701,335.33
1,051,335,33-
22.60 -
GENERAL EQUIP & IMPRVMNTS
1,450,000.00
1,399,029.87
50,970.13
3.51
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL
550,500,00
548,066.62
10.433,3$
1.86
PROGRAM TOTALS
10,541.950.()0
9J26,424,91
1,015,525-92
9.63 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
204,800.00
60,127.29
144,672.71 70.64
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
9,947,650.00
9,112,431.07
835,218.93 8.39
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
389,500.00
353,866.55
35,633�45 9.14
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 10,541,950.00 9,526,424.91 1015,525,09 9.63 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
558,500.00
548,066.62
10,43338
1.86
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
1,484,800.00
1,481,703.74
3,096.26
.20
POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST
FUND
250,000.00
250,000.00
Do
.00
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
4,400,000.00
5,451,335.33
1,051,335.33-
23.89 -
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST
1985
.00
904.27
904.27-
.00
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST
1991
887,000.00
86,557.82
800,442.18
90.24
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
1991
2,961,650.00
1,687,674.52
1,273,975.48
43.01
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND
1992
.00
20,182.61
20,,182&-
.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 10,541,950.00 9,526,424.91 1,015,525.09 9.63 Z
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
8UD6ET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
081 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
EXPENDITURECLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES 16,280.00 16,151.23 128.77 .79
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,700.00 73,447.18 2,747.18- 3.88 -
COMMODITIES 12,500.00 ??,85 05 614.95 4.91
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 99.480000 101 483,46 2.003.46- 2.01-%
SOURCE OF FUNR§
GENERAL FUND 99.480.00 10183 46 - „�;,Xl d¢_ 2.01 -
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS ,,...99.480.00 1,,01.,483.4¢,,, 2,003.46- 2.01-X
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
COMMUNITY GROUPS
42,700.00
45,746.20
3,046.20-
7.13 -
4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS, ET
41,600.00
43,246.84
1,646.84-
3.95 -
HOLIDAY DECORATIONS
151180,00
12,490.42
2,689.58
17.71
PROGRAM TOTALS
22,480.0010,1,4$3.46_
2.003.46-
2.01-%
EXPENDITURECLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES 16,280.00 16,151.23 128.77 .79
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,700.00 73,447.18 2,747.18- 3.88 -
COMMODITIES 12,500.00 ??,85 05 614.95 4.91
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 99.480000 101 483,46 2.003.46- 2.01-%
SOURCE OF FUNR§
GENERAL FUND 99.480.00 10183 46 - „�;,Xl d¢_ 2.01 -
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS ,,...99.480.00 1,,01.,483.4¢,,, 2,003.46- 2.01-X
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
082 LIBRARY SERVICES
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2,823,655..40 .9 2.823,655.00 100.00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2,823.655.00 .00 2,823,655.00 100.00 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
LIBRARY FUND 2.823.655.00 .00 2.823,655.00 100.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2.$2,3,,¢55.00 .DD 2,18,M,p,6WOO 100.00 %
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
LIBRARY OPERATIONS
2.823.655.00
.00
2,823,655.00
100.00
PROGRAM TOTALS
2.823,655.00
.00
2.823,655M
100.00 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2,823,655..40 .9 2.823,655.00 100.00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2,823.655.00 .00 2,823,655.00 100.00 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
LIBRARY FUND 2.823.655.00 .00 2.823,655.00 100.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2.$2,3,,¢55.00 .DD 2,18,M,p,6WOO 100.00 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E 5 U H M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
091 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
1,468,995.00
1,429,250.73
39,744.27
2.70
SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS
84,990.00
84,987 .50
2.50
.00
PROGRAM TOTALS
1,553,985.00
1,11!4.238.23
39,746.77
2.55 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
1„5,5,4,98;,.00
1,514.238.23
39,746.77 2.55
EXPENDITURE TOTALS
1,553,905.00
1 14,3
39,746.77 2.55 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
43,725.00
36,437.30
7,287.70
16.66
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1973
163,250,00
163,394.40
144.40-
.08 -
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1974
258,000.00
257,940.00
60.00
.02
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & 1
23,450.00
23,450.00
Do
.00
SSA #2 BLACKHAWK 8 & 1
27,250.00
27,250.00
.00
.00
POLICE & FIRE BLDG 8 & 11991A
143,515.00
142,370.58
1,144.42
.79
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 1 19910
49,000.00
19,109.97
29,890.03
61.00
INSURANCE RESERVE 9 & 1 1987
102,990.00
102,987.50
2.50
.00
FLOOD CONTROL B & 11991A
103,305.00
102,041.07
1,263.93
1.22
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPHT 6 & 1 19870
114,375.00
114,373.02
1.98
.00
P W FACILITY 9 & 119876
371,190.00
370,951.89
238.11
.06
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPKT 9 9 1 1987C
119,645.00
119,645.00
.00
Do
SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT 9 & 1
34, MOO
34,287.50
2.50
.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS
1,553,985,00
1j14l938,93
39,746.77
2.55 %
u
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 3/31/92
092 PENSION FUNDS
EXPENDITURE S F CATION
PENSION EXPENSE 1.157.600,00 1.031.321.23 126.278,77 10.90
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 11„5,7,MQ 00_ �„�', ,,,,, . _ 12c?zc,77, 10.90 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
EMPLOYEE PENSIONS
36,600.00
33,550.55
3,049.45
8.33
POLICE PENSIONS
543,000.00
464,669.28
78,330.72
14.42
FIREMENS PENSIONS
578_gM tom_
_ "+ 3,101,,0
44,898.60
7.76
PROGRAM TOTALS
1,157,b AO
1,031.321.23
- .126J 77
10.90 %
EXPENDITURE S F CATION
PENSION EXPENSE 1.157.600,00 1.031.321.23 126.278,77 10.90
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 11„5,7,MQ 00_ �„�', ,,,,, . _ 12c?zc,77, 10.90 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
10,600.00
9,715.42
884.58
8.34
BENEFIT TRUST i2
26,000.00
23,835.13
2,164.87
8.32
POLICE PENSION FUND
543,000.00
464,669.28
78,330.72
14.42
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
57�QUD„00-5.'i
„,3 101,;40
44.898.60
7.76
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS
11 1500
1,031,321.23
126,278.77
10.90 X
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
SENIOR CITIZEN MONTH
MAY, 1992
WHEREAS, as with old wine and old friends, Senior Citizens
become more valuable, more precious with the years; and
WHEREAS, from experience, they have accumulated wisdom and
knowhow, and thus can make significant contributions to the
leadership and destiny of our Village; and
WHEREAS, appreciative of their worth, we in Mount Prospect
have taken steps, through the Village of Mount Prospect Senior
Center, our Chamber of Commerce and other concerned
organizations, to consult our senior citizens on their needs
and aspirations; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has established many
areas, including transportation, information and referral,
employment, recreation, health care, housing, and community
activities for our senior citizens; and
WHEREAS, aware of the debt we owe then and the love and care
their past services have merited, we have set aside a specific
time in which to honor our senior citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the month of May, 1992 as
SENIOR CITIZEN MONTH in the Village of Mount Prospect, and I
urge all residents of the community to cooperate in providing
our senior citizens security, health, appreciation and
happiness.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 21st day of April, 1992.
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, 20 years ago this year, the Village of Mount Prospect
became a member of the first multi -community group to provide
Emergency Medical Service in the entire nation; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect was one of the first
communities in the State of Illinois to initiate a Paramedic
program; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has been the recipient of
i many awards and is widely acknowledged as a leader in the field
of the Emergency Medical Services.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect do proclaim the week of May 10 - 16, 1992
as EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK in the village and on behalf
of the Board of Trustees and the residents of our community do
hereby acknowledge and commend the continued dedication of the
I
Mount Prospect Fire Department who provides quality emergency
medical services.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 5th day of May, 1992
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, it is believed that 90% of fire deaths in Illinois could
be prevented with the installation of smoke detectors and proper
j! home escape plans for every residence; and
WHEREAS, to achieve that goal, the Office of the State Fire Marshal
and organizations of Fire Chiefs, Fire Inspectors and Firefighters
have joined together in a state-wide program to make the public
more aware of the advantages that properly placed smoke detectors
can give; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Firefighters work diligently to reduce
those horrendous fire deaths and property losses through
prevention, public education and suppression; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Fire Department, Rouse/Randhurst Inc.
and neighboring fire departments will once again host the
CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY FESTIVAL WEEK at the Randhurst Shopping
Center May 3 through May 9, 1992, at which time children of all
ages will be encouraged to learn and participate in proper fire
survival techniques.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount
Prospect, do hereby proclaim the week of May 3 through 9, 1992 as
CHILDREN'S FIRE SAFETY WEEK.
I call upon our citizens individually and as a community to
actively support their firefighters in their effort to reduce fire'
deaths, injuries and property loss. I also urge the news media and
other public information officers to join in the recognition and
encourage participation in this event.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 21st day of April, 1992
"Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: APRIL 17, 1992
SUBJECT: CONSIDERATION FOR MODIFICATION TO THE DEFINITION
OF ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS TO INCLUDE BEVERAGES
ADVERTISED AS NON-ALCOHOLIC
Perhaps the Board needs a little bit of background as to why this is being brought
forward. The original reason this was brought to our attention is that one of the local,
large grocery chains indicated that their legal counsel bad reviewed our Ordinance
concerning liquor sales and noticed that "non-alcoholic beers and light wines" were not
included in the definition of alcoholic beverages. They called and asked whether it
would be permissible for them to sell it on the shelves to anyone without a liquor
license. My response was that since there is alcohol in it, my interpretation would be
that it would not be permissible for people underage to purchase it nor should anyone
sell it without a Liquor License. They concurred with my interpretation, however, they
said the way our Ordinance was drafted, this was not necessarily the case.
This last week, I also had a conversation with a representative of the Miller Brewing
Company who inquired as to the reason for our change and I gave him the same
discussion that is listed above. He, wholeheartedly, agreed. He said their interpretation
of their sales market is not to underage people and not to encourage underage people
to become familiar with alcoholic beverages. Their market is, in fact, for those people
who are of age who wish to have a beverage that tastes the same but has less alcoholic
content and less calories.
I—�
Village of Mount Prospect rf
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: RONALD W. PAVLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE
SUBJECT: ELIMINATION OF NEAR BEER SALES TO MINORS
ORDINANCE
DATE: APRIL 15, 1992
At the April 7, 1991 Village Board meeting the first reading of an ordinance took
place that would further define an alcoholic beverage as any product that is sold
that contains any amount of alcohol such as Near Beer and other products on the
market. Our current ordinance defines an alcoholic beverage as any beverage that
contains a .5 or greater percentage of alcohol. The proposed legislation simply is
in keeping with the times by reducing the allowable content level to zero. This
legislation is being proposed to keep up with our innovative liquor industry. Near
Beer contained over .5% in the past. it now contains only .2, .3 and .4 percent.
My staff and I support a zero tolerance alcohol content on beverages that are sold
as beer, liquor or wine products.
My staff has always concurred with any legislation that would prevent the
consumption of any type of beverage that could eventually lead to the acceptance
by minors of an alcoholic beverage. That is, even though the companies that
produce Near Beer and similar products state that it is not an alcoholic beverage it,
in fact, contains alcohol and gives the children in our community the feeling that
we as adults approve of this type of consumption. in fact, these products do
contain alcohol, but a lower percentage than our current ordinance definition of
.5%
My staff and I support any legislation that would eliminate the sale of any product
to any child that would have even a slight alcohol content. Just as our Village
Board took a stand on the Health Spa issue and the Mayor has taken strong
punitive action on all liquor violations, I believe this legislation would be a step in
the right direction for our businesses in creating an environment of no alcoholic
beverage consumption by children in our community.
Finally, we discussed this issue with representatives of the Alliance Against
Intoxicated Motorists (AAIM) and they too agree that businesses should not be
allowed to sell alcoholic beverage prototypes to minors no matter what percentage
of alcohol they contain. They have forwarded a letter (see attached) that supports
this ordinance.
RWPjd
Alliance Against Intoxlcated Motorists
Woodflsid Grave, Suite 131 870 East Hlggina Road Schaumburg, Illinois 80173
(700) 2400027
FAX (708) 240-0029
April 15, 1992
Mayor Gerald L. Farley and Trustees
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Crncago (312) 521.1119
Victim Hotline: (709) 697•AAIM
Re: sale of "near beer" to those under 21 years of age
Dear Mayor and Trustees:
It has come to our attention that your community is
considering an ordinance to ban the sale of low alcohol
beverages to persons under 21. on behalf of the membership
of AAIM, I urge you to pass this ban,
Recent tragedies in your area involving minors points
out clearly that the combination of our youth and alcoholic
beverages must be combatted. The alcoholic beverage most
often consumed by minors before killing themselves or someone
else in a car crash is - beer. We as a nation, state and
community must work harder to wean our youth from beer. But
how can we do that if we don't try to protect them from
developing a beer habit early.
Looking at the situation from another angle, it is
important to note that "non -alcohol" beer is a misnomer. All
the ones I'm aware of have alcohol in them. The average
alcohol content of beer is 4-5%. Near beer has up to .5%
alcohol. That's why recovering alcoholics warn about the
danger of these low --alcohol drinks.
I'm sure Mt. Prospect doesn't approve of allowing minora
to consume a beverage that contains up to one-eighth of the
alcohol in regular beer. Just as we wouldn't want a minor to
be able to buy one can of regular beer and be able to
"legally" share it with 7 friends.
Thann of +ia working to prevent underage drinking are
more concerned about the principle of no use of alcohol by
minors rather than jiiRt about the volume of the liquid
• r r AA1M TO SAYE LWU
IKWIT DRINK AND DRIVE r r r
- 2 -
intake" If we want to discourage a minor from drinking one
can of beer with 0 of alcohol by volume, we should also
discourage the same minor drinking 8 cans of "near -bear" with
.5% of alcohol in each can, or 8 minors each drinking lj$th
of a can of regular beer.
The beer brewers gay their low -alcohol products ars not
aimed at children. Let's take them at their word, and
prohibit children from buying a beverage that is packaged
just like beer, that tastes just like beer, that contains
some alcohol, and that helps children to develop the taste
for and habit of Meer drinking. Children begin drinking
alcohol at younger and younger ages. You can help stop that
trend by enacting the proposed ordinance. We hope you do.
Respectfully yours,
David T. Osborn
President
BH/caf
4/2/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 13.101 entitled "Definitions" of Chapter
13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby
further amended by amending the definition of "Alcoholic Liquor"
in its entirety; so that hereinafter the definition of Alcoholic
Beverage shall be and read as follows:
ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR: 1. Any spirits, wine, beer, ale or other
liquid containing more than one-half of
one percent (.5%) of alcohol by volume,
which is fit for beverage purposes.
2. For the purposes of this Chapter,
Alcoholic Liquor shall also include any
beverage commonly known as "near beer",
"non-alcoholic beer", or "non-alcoholic
wine" whose taste, color, odor and
consistency are similar to the alcoholic
beverages known as beer -and wine and,
except for the reduced alcohol content,
is marketed as being similar to beer or
wine."
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
U11
CAF/
3/27/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R -X TO R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT AS IT
PERTAINS TO PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ATJ= W. LINCOLN
3;
WHEREAS, Semar Home Builders (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) , has filed an application to rezone the property
commonly known as 2023 West Lincoln Street (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property), legally described as follows:
Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, being a
subdivision in the west half of the southwest quarter of the
southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois;
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned.
from R -X to R-1 (Single Family Residence) District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 9-Z-92, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
February, 1992 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having
been published in the Mount Prospegt Herald on the 11th day of
February, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of
ZBA 9-Z-92 and have determined that the best interests- of the
Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION QNE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove arL-
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to
a R-1 (Single Family Residence) District.
SECTION OUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Village President
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk J5
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 9, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-9-Z-92, SEMAR HOME BUILDERS
HICKORY & LINCOLN SUBDIVISION
LOCATION: 2320 W. LINCOLN AVE. (NWC LINCOLN & HICKORY)
Zoning :ng _tueg
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for rezoning from an R -X Single Family District to an R-1 Single Family
District. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit a three -lot subdivision.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Tom McCabe, Engineer for the project, was present to represent the
request. Mr. McCabe indicated that the rezoning request is in order to allow a subdivision
of three lots.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning, explained that this request is consistent with the trend
in this area and the lots meet or exceed the minimum requirements for an R-1 Single
Family District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request, and there were no serious
issues raised. The Chairman read the rezoning standards and the Board felt the requested
rezoning is appropriate for this area.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single Family to allow the subdivision of three
lots.
Subdivision Reauest
The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed Hickory and Lincoln Subdivision at their
meetings of February 19 and March 4, 1992. The subdivision application also included
request for waivers of certain public improvements:
Storm Sewe - The Plan Commission recommended against installing storm sewers
in the subdivision. The Engineering Coordinator explained that existing overland
drainage is to the northwest, and that a storm sewer is not reasonably available for
connection.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
2. Street Improvements - The developer asked that the Village accept a cash escrow at
this time in order to defer the construction of street improvements. The Plan
Commission recommends that improvements not be installed at this time, and that
a cash deposit for improvement costs was acceptable.
3. Sidewalks - The Plan Commission recommends that sidewalks be installed at this
time, choosing to deny the developer's request to defer sidewalk construction.
4. Strectligbts - The Plan Commission recommends that a restrictive covenant be
recorded guaranteeing the installation of street lights at a date to be determined by
the Village.
With these considerations, the Plan Commission recommends approval of the Hickory -
Lincoln Subdivision.
Concerning the deferral of street improvements, staff would recommend that the street,
curb, gutter and sidewalk all be installed at this time. The Planning Department and
Engineering Division believe all street improvements can be properly designed and
constructed, and that there is no advantage to the Village to accept a cash deposit and defer
construction of these required public improvements.
DMC:hg
•ir I . �
.i � ".1 J y � r .M,
,7., r ` .i i s :,�
'� rrw �
� r .,
..
____. ..__.._........,_.._.,.,.�.,.��.a.rn»tsrouoR,�aPa�secnr�,a..u.,: I
r
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 9-Z-92 Hearing Date: February 27, 1992
PETITIONER: Semar Home Builders
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2320 West Lincoln
PUBLICATION DATE: February 11, 1992
REQUEST: A map amendment or rezoning from the existing
R -X Single Family Residence District to an R-
1 Single Family Residence District of Mount
Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow a three -
lot subdivision meeting all R-1 District
standards.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Ed Eigel, 2320 White Oak
Norman VanTil, 1316 South Hickory
Dave Lewandowski, 516 East Lincoln
Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being a rezoning from an RA Single Family
District to an R-1 Single Family District. The request was filed by Semar Home Builders.
Mr. Tom McCabe of Seton Engineering, introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated
that the application was filed to allow a rezoning to an R-1 Single Family District and to
permit a three -lot subdivision of this large parcel at the comer of Hickory and Lincoln.
Mr. McCabe stated that the proposed lot sizes would be similar to other lots in the area and
that the rezoning is consistent with other R-1 zoning in the immediate proximity.
Mr. Clements then summarized this request for the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained
that Semar Builders is the contract purchaser of this property and had requested the
rezoning from R -X to R-1 in order to allow a three -lot subdivision that met all regulations
of the R-1 District. Mr. Clements explained that the subdivision plat is currently being
processed through the Plan Commission, and then discussed the proposed lot sizes to
demonstrate to the Zoning Board that the lot sizes met all requirements of the requested
R-1 zoning. Mr. Clements noted that the R-1 zoning classification would be consistent with
the area. He explained that this area on the west side of the Village is undergoing a
transition from the large lot R -X zoning to more standard sized R-1 lots and that the three
proposed lots will be compatible with lot sizes in the general area, therefore, the proposed
rezoning was appropriate.
ZBA-9-V-92
February 27, 1992
Page 2
Chairman Basnik then asked for comments from members of the audience. Ed Eigel, 2320
White Oak questioned watermain extensions for the proposed subdivision, and Mr. McCabe
responded that the watermain would be extended up Hickory Street for this subdivision.
Mr. Lannon asked what the capacity for the watermain was, and Mr. McCabe stated that
this would be a six inch main with sufficient capacity to serve the three proposed lots and
any extension to the north.
Norman VanTil, 1316 South Hickory objected to the rezoning because of a concern for
storm drainage from the three lots. Mr. Basnik explained that the Zoning Board of Appeals
was only reviewing the requested rezoning and that questions about stormwater drainage
should be directed to the Engineering Department.
Dave Lewandowski, 516 East Lincoln, objected to the rezoning and the three proposed lots.
He stated that he would prefer to see this area remain a neighborhood of large lots.
Chairman Basnik then reviewed the standards for a rezoning or amendment from the
Zoning Ordinance, and the Zoning Board generally discussed the rezoning standards. From
conversation, it was determined that the application met the rezoning standards of the
Zoning Ordinance and that the proposed rezoning to an R-1 District would be consistent
with the area and compatible with lot sizes to the north and to the south along Lincoln
Street.
Mr. Saviano pointed out that the new homes would have a positive impact on the area in
terms of property values and might be more beneficial than the existing single family home
on this lot.
There being no further discussion or comments, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the
request. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of
a rezoning from an R -X to an R-1 District. The motion was seconded by Mr. Saviano.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion
This re,
by a vote of 6
dation will be
irded to the Village Board for their consideration.
,tfully submitted,
.C&WA�
M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-9-Z-92
APPLICANT: SEMAR HOME BUILDERS
ADDRESS: 2320 W. LINCOLN AVE. (NWC LINCOLN & HICKORY)
LOCATION MAP:
3-01,
308
W
303 302
30'10
05
�O6
0'
41 2
'*'
307
307
J314
—
309
3161
309 308
F 311
7777
wNryt OAK ;7
301
307
z
0 311
317
323
329
335
X41
302,
301 3007
308
W
303 302
314'
05
�O6
307
320,
—
309 308
326
311 310 j
332
313 3t2
N
3t5 ata
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X, Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 143.4'x1501 = 21,510 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting a rezoning from an R -X Single Family District to a R-1 Single
Family District. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit a three -lot subdivision.
Summary of application: Semar Builders is the contract purchaser of the parcel at the
northwest comer of Lincoln Avenue and Hickory. The petitioner requested the rezoning
from R -X to R-1 in order to allow a three -lot subdivision that conforms to all R-1
regulations.
The subdivision application is being processed through the Plan Commission.
For the information of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the proposed lot sizes are as follows:
Lot 1 - 72' x 145.55' = 10,479 sq. ft.
Lot 2 - 72' x 145.55' = 10,479 sq. ft.
Lot 3 - 76' x 145.55' = 11,061 sq. ft. (comer lot)
The R-1 Districts require a 65 ft. minimum lot width, and a 8,125 sq. ft. area. Comer lots
require a 75 ft. width and 9,375 sq. ft. area.
The proposed subdivision meets all R-1 lot size requirements.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The proposed R-1 zoning classification will be
consistent with the area. This area on the west side of the Village is undergoing a transition
from large lot R -X zoning to more standard size R-1 lots. The three proposed lots Will be
compatible with lot sizes in this general area.
DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
No objections or concerns were raised by other Village Departments concerning the
rezoning.
SUMMARXIBECOMMENDATION
The petitioner must address the rezoning standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Provided this
is adequately done, staff would recommend approval of the rezoning. The proposed zoning
district and lot sizes are appropriate for this area.
DMC:hg
NENUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order
by Chairman Weibel at 8:OOP.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street,
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL
Presentupon Roll Call: Frank Boege
Ls,nn Kloster
Elizabeth Luxem
Thomas McGovern
William Navigato
Carol Tortorello
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Absent: Thomas Borrelli
Village Staff Present: Michael Sims, Staff Planner
Press Staff Present: Carolyn Arnold, Daily Herald
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mrs. Tortorello, that the minutes of
February 5, 1992 be approved as submitted. All members voted Aye and Mr.
Weibel declared the minutes approved.
SUBDIVISIONS
Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, 2320 West lincoln Street
The petitioner was requesting that three lots be created from one single lot
of record and Development Code modifications for streets, street lighting,
side walks, storm sewer, curb and gutter. The developer, Mr.Philip Semar and
Mr. Thomas McCabe, Sr.,Chief Engineer for Seton Engineering company performing
the engineering for the development were present to explain the development.
Five development code modifications were being requested and all were questioned
by commission members. Mr. McCabe commented that the development code waiver
requests had been made at the recommendation of Staff and that the developer
was willing to drop the waiver request on the curb and gutter, street and side
walk improvements.
One request was for a waiver to permit the development to be built without
storm sewers. Staff recommended the granting of this request but contingent
upon the development of a storm water system for the site that was approved by
the Village Engineer. Nearby residents with property adjacent to the development
were present and voiced their concern over flooding conditions.
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1992
Edward and Shirlee Topel of 31
that flood water now runs on t
adequate drainage this develop
South Helena was afraid his pr
would get flooded. Mr. McCabe
development site towards the n
added that water from the deve
Street, would not run off to t
side is lower than on the eas
South Leonard directly across the street stated
!ir property and were concerned that without
int would make it worse. Norman Vantil of 316
ierty adjacent to the development on the north
tated that currently, water drains off the
'thwest of the property onto vacant land. He
pment, which is on the west side of Hickory
east side because the elevation on the west
side.
Discussion followed and some differences of opinion voiced concerning whether
curb and gutter, sidewalks and street lighting improvements should be installed
now or later. In response, the developer offerred to place money in,escrow to
cover the code modification requests.
MI
r. Velasco commented that he would not vote to approve the storm sewer code
modification request that was contingent upon the development of a storm water
system that is approved by the Village Engineer.
Mr. Boege moved, seconded by Mr. Velasco, that the petitioner's request be set
aside until the storm water question was resolved. The vote on the motion was
3 Aye; 5 Nay and the motion failed.
After further discussion Mr. Weibel suggested a motion might be made to approve
the request for subdivision subject to three contingencies: (1) that it was
contingent upon the development of a storm water system for the site approved
by the Village Engineer and that the Developer and the Village Engineer come
back to the Plan Commission with the approved plan (2) that the Developer will
put money into escrow for curb & gutter, street and sidewalk improvements and
(3) the street lighting code requirement to be waived contingent upon the
recording of a restrictive covenant guaranteeing the installation of a Village
street light at a later time when requested by the Village and that the developer
install conduit under all driveway aprons so future street lights cna be installed
along Hickory without damaging the aprons. Mr. McGovern moved, and seconded by
Mrs. Luxem, to approve the developers request for subdivision subject to these
contingencies. The vote was 4 Aye; 4 Nay. Motion failed for lack of a majority.
Mr. Navigato explained that he voted against the motion because,.in his opinion,
the installation of sidewalks should be done now and not be delayed.
Mr. Navigato moved, and seconded by Lynn Kloeter, that the request for sub-
division be approved subject to; (1) contingent upon the development of a storm
water system approved by the Village Engineer and that the developer and the
Village Engineer come to the Plan Commission with the approved plan (2)that the
request to waive requirements for sidewalks on Hickory and Lincoln be denied,
(3) that the request to waive Code requirements for curb & gutter and street
improvements be approved contingent upon the developer putting money into escrow
to cover the cost of these improvements when they are done,(4) the street lighting
code requirement to be waived contingent upon the recording of a restrictive cove-
nant guaranteeing the installation of a Village street light at a later time when
requested by the Village and that the developer install conduit under all drive-
way aprons. The vote was 5 Aye; 3 Nay. Motion passed.
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1992
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development: N(; report
B. Comprehensive Plan: No report
C. Development Code: No report
D. Text Amendment: Nc report
NEW BUSINESS
PAGE 3
A. Status of Revision of Development Code
Mr. Sims reported that Staff has started an effort on the Development Code
revision however the main thrust has been on the Zoning Code. when that is
completed full effort on the Development Code will follow. At the present
time, Staff is waiting for input on storm and sanitary water from Engineering
and Inspection Services.
B. Comprehensive Affordability Strategy Status Review
Mr. Sims reviewed the Village effort on the current year CHAS plan and the
monitoring of it. Five items covered were senior citizen housing, rehabili-
tation of senior citizens homes, rental assistance, first time home buyers
program and providing opportunity for homes for the mentally ill. Mr. Sims
stated that March will be the sixth month of this CHAS year and they will
contact agencies to see how they are doing. He also commented on meeting
with CEDA Northwest and other agencies dealing with the homeless problem.
They are looking into the possibility of a centralized site for the homeless.
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
In connection with the Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, Mr. Boege asked why
Staff had suggested that the developer request the development code modifi-
cations. Mr. Sims said he wasn't present at the time so couldn't answer it.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:45P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MCUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MARCH 4, 1992
CELL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order
by Chairman Weibel at 8:OOP.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street,
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL
Present upon Roll Call: Thomas Borrelli
Lynn Kloster
Elizabeth Luxem
William Navigato
Carol Tortorello
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Absent: Frank Boege
Thomas McGovern
Village Staff Present: Michael Sims, Staff Planner
Press Staff Present: Patrick O'Toole, Daily Herald
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mrs. Luxem moved, seconded by Mrs. Tortorello, to approve the minutes of
February 19, 1992 as submitted. All members voted Aye. Minutes approved.
SUBDIVISIONS
Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, 2320 West Lincoln Street
The subject subdivision was essentially approved at the prior meeting but was
contingent upon the development of a storm water system approved by the Village
Engineer and that the developer and Engineer present the approved plan to the
Plan Commission.
Mr. Thomas McCabe, representing the developer and Mr. Jeff Wulbecker, Village
Engineering Coordinator were present to explain the system for storm water
run off from the site. Basically, the water would run off to the northwest of
the property as it does at the present time. A swale would be constructed along
the east and north sides ruluiing to the northwest corner of the site. Mr. Wul-
becker stated that the elevations were such that the swale would take 3-2 feet of
water before it would run onto adjacent property to the north. He added that
since the development is less than one acre it does not cross the threshold for
detention requirements and releasing the storm water as sheet flow at the north-
west corner of the site is the most appropriate drainage system.
Mr. Weibel invited comments from the visitors present. Mr. Edward Topel of 314
South Leonard commented that he hoped the system would work and if the water
went that way he had no objection, however, he had a feeling the situation wculd
get worse. Mr. Norman Vantil of 316 South Helena expressed similiar thoughts and
hoped the development would not result in more water run off.
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2
MEETING OF MARCH 4,, 1992
Mr. Weibel acknowledged the concerns of the residents and expressed the hope
that the storm water system as developed would be successful so that water
will not run across the street and onto their property.
Mrs. Luxem moved, and seconded by Mr. Navigato, to approve the development
code modification for storm sewers and in place of storm sewers, the developer
will provide storm water run off in accordance with the village Engineering
plan. The vote was 5 Aye; 2 Nay. Motion passed.
Mr. Navigato moved, and seconded by Mrs. Luxem, that the Hickory Lincoln Sub-
division be approved subject to the contingincies and code modifications pre-
viously approved by the Plan Commission. The vote was 5 Aye; 2 Nay. Motion
passed.
Mr. Velasco stated that he had voted against the motions because he believed
the storm water problem could have been handled better and also, he was negative
tc all the development code modifications asked for. He felt the developer was
just passing on the cost of the improvements needed. Mr. Wiebel stated that he
had voted against the motions because he felt the storm water problem was not
adequately addressed. He felt there should be an overall storm water run off
plan for the whole area.
Mr. Weibel remarked that these issues should be addressed during the review
of development code revisions.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development: No report
B. Comprehensive Plan: No report
C. Development Code: Nc report
D. Text Amendment: No report
OLD BUSINESS
Mr. Velasco reported that he had some additional information concerning
railroad signals. On the Soo Line a button can be pressed to disconnect the
signal during a train stop. However, in Mt. Prospect there are three tracks
which comolicates the situation.
NEW BUS
Mr. Velasco reported that a new parking lot has been put on the old Wille
property.
Mr. Sims reported that on March 21 a number of people will be going to Lake
Forest to look at their operation and if any of the Plan Commission members
were interested in going, to let him know.
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:25P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary
CAF/
3/31/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR
PROPERTY GENEP
.,ALLY M
OWN AS 2320 WEST LINCOLN STREET
WHEREAS, Semar Home Builders (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has requested modifications from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property commonly known
as 2320 West Lincoln Street (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property) and legally described as follows:
Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, being a
subdivision in the west half of the southwest quarter of
the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section
10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting the following modifications
from the Development Code in conjunction with the creation of a 3
lot single family subdivision:
1. To waive the required installation of storm sewers;
2. To permit a cash deposit guaranteeing installation of street
improvements at a future date;
3. To defer the installation of sidewalks until the street is
installed; and
4. To authorize a Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing installation
of street lights until such time as the Village determined.
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modifications from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property at their regular meetings on
February 19, 1992 and March 4, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendations
relative to the modifications requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant the following
modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16):
1. To waive the requirement to install storm sewers; and
2. To waive the requirement to install street lights, provided
a Restrictive Covenant is executed guaranteeing installation
of street lights at a future date, to be determined by the
Village. Street light conduit is to be installed at this time
under the driveways of the 3 proposed homes.
Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision
Modifications from Development Code
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: That, as a condition on the Petitioner to install
required street in conjunction with this development, the Village
states that the home owners in the Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision will
not be assessed for any additional street improvements for a period
of ten (10) years from the date the Village officially accepts.the
public street.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois yM r
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE: April 10, 1992
SUBJECT: hickory/Lincoln Subdivision
As requested by the Mayor and Village Board at their April 7 meeting I am
providing the following drainage information associated with the subject project. Attached
please find the existing aerial/topography map and the proposed drainage plan.
The Engineering Division has reviewed the storm water drainage plan and
finds that it meets all requirements and is acceptable. The storm water drainage system
should simulate as close as possible the existing drainage conditions where practical. The
proposed plan releases storm water runoff at the northwest corner of the site, the same as
the present conditions.
JAW/m
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, V LAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMS DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
r
DATE: APRIL 1, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-V-92, EDWARD R. EGLE
LOCATION: 2320 WEST WHITE OAK
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Edward R. Egle. The application was filed to allow
the reduction of the 40 foot required front yard setback of the R -X Single Family District,
Section 14.1002, to 28.3 feet to allow the construction of a room addition.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of March 26, 1992.
At the meeting Mr. Egle presented testimony in support of the request. He indicated that
the addition would match the existing house in style and material.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, explained that this is a large comer lot and that the addition would
be in line with the neighboring properties. Mr. Forsythe also indicated that this area is
experiencing a transition to R-1 zoning and that the requested setback is consistent with that
required in an R-1 Single Family District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and determined that the
request would provide a setback similar to adjoining properties, and consistent with R-1
setbacks in the area. Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
that the Village Board approve a variation to allow a front yard of 28.3 feet instead of 40
feet in order to allow the construction of a room addition.
DMC:hg
I
1 _ _fo,'T
ftivri
WHITE 600-K SIKEEI
oxisrI & Fr*lpEFIcE
f 3d.2„
E
GdltG.
R94,:0Ft9S ax,sT,POR
awAve -PAwow f;OK w4x-cor
t ow►+"Cme tree Mt,ov
(ci�tt(oUF wof� SALE Apr9ox')
t-
so
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 14-V-92
Hearing Date: March 26, 1992
PETITIONER:
Edward and Gale Egle
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
2320 White Oak
PUBLICATION DATE:
March 10, 1992
REQUEST:
Variation to reduce 40 ft. required front yard
of R -X Single Family District, Section 14.1002,
to 28.3 ft. to allow construction of a room
addition.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced the agenda item and described this as a variation to reduce the
40 foot front yard of an R•X Single Family District to 28 feet to allow the construction of
a room "addition.
Mr. Ed Egle introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained that he
would like to extend his house to the south towards Lincoln Street for the purposes of
constructing a new large family room and master bedroom suite. He explained that he
would like to reduce the 40 foot front yard to 28 feet thereby, requesting a variation of 12
feet. The petitioner stated that the room addition would be of the same design as the
existing house with a matching roof line, window treatment and the same color of brick.
Mr. Egle stated that he believed that the reduced front yard would have no adverse impact
on the area and that there were many homes in this neighborhood built on 30 foot front
yard setbacks.
ZBA-14-V-92
March 26, 1992
Page 2
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe pointed out that the property is a large lot of over 18,000 square feet and that this
lot meets the R -X lot size requirements. He pointed out however, that there are many lots
in this area of R-1 lot sizes and most of these homes are constructed with the R-1 setback.
He pointed out that the lot to the west of the subject site maintains a front yard setback
similar to that being requested with this variation.
Mr. Forsythe also noted that the property to the east is currently vacant but it was of a size
that would be sufficient for a three -lot R-1 subdivision. He noted that there is a general
trend in this neighborhood of rezoning large lots to R-1 zoning and that the requested front
yard variation would provide a setback very similar to a 30 foot requirement of an R-1
District. He explained that the staff recommends approval of the request because the
proposed setback would match the property to the west, and also the setback would provide
a yard that was similar to the 30 foot setback of other R-1 properties in the general area.
Mr. Basnik inquired as to the percent of lot coverage on the site and Mr. Forsythe noted
that lot coverage was proposed at 26% with this large lot.
Mr. Lannon concurred with the staff report and noted that a more typical R-1 setback is 30
feet and that the 28 foot yard proposed with this request is very close to the R-1 standard.
Mr. Lannon also asked about any plans the petitioner might have for the existing garage.
Mr. Lannon explained that this garage is built at an existing 15 foot setback and it projects
in front of the existing setback pattern of houses along this block. Mr. Lannon thought that
if there were any plans for this garage, perhaps it could be moved back to the same setback
as the house. Mr. Egle explained that he has no plans to remove or replace the garage at
this time; and Mr. Clements pointed out that any new garage would have to meet setback
requirements.
Mrs. Skowron confirmed that if the garage was damaged and rebuilt it would have to be
moved to a conforming setback or receive a variation to be rebuilt at this same location.
Mr. Clements confirmed that a variation could be requested to rebuild a garage at the same
location.
Chairman Basnik then summarized the standards for variations from the Zoning Ordinance
and the Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the standards. It was determined that
the proposed room addition met the applicable standards and that the variation would have
no adverse impact on surrounding properties.
ZBA-14-V-92
March 26, 1992
Page 3
Accordingly, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mrs. Skowron moved that the
Zoning Board recommend approval of a variation to allow a 28 foot front yard for the
property at 2320 West White Oak. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon.
Upon roll call: AYES: Cassidy, Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectively submitted,
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning and Zoning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND WINING DEPARTMENT
Mount Pmspect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
M(
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
MARCH 16, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-14-V-92
APPLICANT:
EDWARD X EGLE
ADDRESS:
2320 WEST WHITE OAK
LOCATION MAP:
212
PIP
WRLE
z WOO ft 14 V. Ix
i1 wwr/ W, w &4 rr
2011
M(
2'0 1
--
200
—
0
211
200
201
207
209
210
204
206
207 20 81
:213
:213:] 214
219 220
225 226
231 232
237
N
301 N
303 310
305 312
307 314
309 316
206
219
—
212
219
224
223
225
228
227
230
211
230
0
04
245
—
234
240
235
C14
�7,
211
N
N
246
WHITE OAK
Y'
301 302
307 308
311 314
317 320
323 326
329 332
335 N
341 04
301 300
303 302
305 304
307 306
—
309 308
311 310
311
0
04
N
313 312
0
to
N
315314
316
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X
LOT SIZE: 18,226.75 Sq.Ft.
% COVERAGE: 18.46% (Proposed 26.28%)
KA—R.: .07 (Proposed .15)
Gil,Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a variation to reduce the 40 foot required front yard setback of the
R -X Single Family District, Section 14.1002, to 28.3 feet to allow the construction of a room
addition.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the front
of the existing house. The lot is a comer lot with the narrowest portion on White Oak.
Currently, the front door faces White Oak, however, the proposed addition indicates the
door to be relocated to Hickory Avenue. The house is set back approximately 35 feet from
Hickory Avenue.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The subject property contains 18,236 square feet,
meeting the R -X lot size requirement. However, there are many R-1 lots in this area, with
homes constructed at the less restrictive R-1 setbacks. The lot to the west maintains a front
yard setback similar to that being requested by the applicant. The property to the east is
currently vacant, however, staff feels that this property could be rezoned to R-1 and
subdivided into three lots. There is a general trend in this area to R-1 Zoning and this
request would allow similar setbacks of an R-1 zoned district.
OTHER DEP,ARI[MENTAL COMMENTS
No major objections or concerns were stated by other staff. Inspection Services Department
and Engineering both indicated that drainage plans must be submitted with building permit
applications.
_SUMMARXIRECO MENDATION ,
Staff recommends approval of this request. Because of the nature of the surrounding
properties as well as the general trend in this area to rezone to R-1 Single family, the
proposed front yard encroachment will generally fit in with the area.
DMC:hg
CAF
4/8/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 2320 WEST WHITE OAK
WHEREAS, Edward R. and Gale A. Egle (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 2320 West White Oak (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 15 in Callero and Catino's Cypress Gardens, being a
subdivision of the West 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of the
Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 10,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seeks a variation from section 14.1002 to
allow a side yard setback of 23.3 feet for a room addition; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 14-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of March,
1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Pros Herald on the 20th day of March, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 14-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1002 to allow a 28.3 foot side yard setback for a
room addition.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
Fw�=—
ZBA 14-V-92
Page 2 of 2
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMEN'I"S CTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
APRIL 1, 1992
SUBJECT:
ZBA-16-V-92, KENNETH T. NIEBUHR
LOCATION:
906 SEE-GWUN
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Kenneth Niebuhr of 906 SeeGwun. The variation was
filed to allow the replacement of an existing 17'-8" driveway with a 20 foot driveway for a
one -car garage. Section 14.3016 allows a maximum driveway width of 15 foot for a one -
car garage.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of March 26, 1992. At the
meeting, Kenneth Niebuhr presented information that the driveway was being replaced and
that their future plans, were to add to the existing garage so that it would house two cars.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, explained that this request was not uncommon for this area and that
the driveway width would not contribute to a lot coverage problem.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed this request. They indicated that with a
one -car garage additional parking was needed and with the applicant's future plans to add
to the existing one -car garage, a wider driveway would be allowed.
Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a variation to allow a driveway with a width of 20 feet.
DMC:hg
1719
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 16-V-92
10:4011935:19
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Hearing Date: March 26, 1992
Kenneth T. Niebuhr
906 SeeGwun Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: March 11, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a variation of
Section 14.3016 to increase the maximum
driveway width from 15 ft. to 20 ft. for a one -
car garage in an R-1 Single Family District.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced this next agenda item and stated this is a request to
increase the maximum driveway width of 15 feet for a one -car garage to 20 feet for the
property at 906 SeeGwun Avenue.
The petitioner, Kenneth Niebuhr introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and
stated that he proposed to construct a wider driveway for better off-street parking for his
family automobiles. He stated that the request was filed for a 20 foot driveway but that he
would reduce it to 19 feet as pointed out in the staff report. However, Mr. Niebuhr stated
that he did not want to taper the driveway width at the property line because he has a large
van and the total driveway width is necessary to provide proper parking for the van. Mr.
Niebuhr acknowledged that the driveway approach in the parkway would be limited to the
15 foot maximum. The petitioner also explained that he was hoping to add on to his
existing one -car garage to provide a two -car garage and that, at this time he was getting
quotes to do this future addition. He explained that, if the two -car garage were constructed,
he believed that it was appropriate to go ahead and install the wider driveway apron in the
parkway at this time.
Mr. Forsythe summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that
the petitioner would like to enlarge an existing 17 1/2 foot driveway to 20 feet. Mr.
Forsythe pointed out that, in this neighborhood, there are many one -car garages that are
ZBA-16-V-92
March 26, 1992
Page 2
served by an 18 or 20 foot driveway, and that these wider, driveways provide better off-
street parking for residents.
The Zoning Board then generally discussed the request and there was discussion about the
necessity of tapering the driveway to meet the 15 foot maximum paving width in the
parkway and whether the consideration of a future garage addition could allow the 20 foot
apron to be installed at this time.
Mr. Basnik believed it was reasonable to allow a wider apron in the parkway to be installed
at this time, if the petitioner was intending to construct a complete two -car garage.
Mr. Saviano stated that it was his opinion that, inasmuch as there is an existing one -car
garage at this time, the apron width should be left to the maximum 15 feet and that when
a garage addition is constructed the petitioner can come back and request to install the
wider apron at that time.
Mr. Lannon pointed out that a neighboring property has a similar driveway width; and the
Zoning Board of Appeals acknowledged that wider driveways would not be uncommon or
inappropriate in this neighborhood.
Accordingly, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Cassidy moved that the
Zoning Board of Appeals approve a 20 foot driveway width for the property at 906
SeeGwun Avenue. The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion approved by a vote of 7-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectively submitted,.
&/W C4WaW_t5__
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning and Zoning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAI m
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
MARCH 16, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-16-V-92
APPLICANT.
KENNETH T. NIEBUHR
ADDRESS:
906 SEE-GWUN
LOCATION MAP:
i -0
819 1 818 819 1 818 1 r81 21 'r' 103
SUNSET
901 900
903 902
905 AD -4A
NlEbu*p-
1 908
908
08
7-SAw -#to-VwJZ"' 1 9 8
0
913 912
AA
5
915 9174 V1
917 916
918
919. 918
! 1 9231 924
X
z
.9
901
903
905 902
907 904
909 906
911 908
913 910
915J91 2
917 914
919 916
921
0
923,
GOLF
to
1000
1001
0
-TO-
02
1003
4,
1004
a
1005
00
0
0 0
1006
1007
0
im
C5 aw 'm
100
y
PALM
1011
1
020
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
R-1
LOT SIZE:
8,125 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE:
28%, (Proposed 29%)
FAR.:
11
Gil. Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
Q=
The petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 14.3016 to increase the maximum
driveway width from 15 feet to 20 feet for a one -car garage in an R-1 Single Family District.
PL-AMING AND ZONING COMMENTS AND CONCERNS
Summary of application: The applicant is seeking to replace an existing 17'-8" driveway
with a 20 ft driveway for a one -car garage.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioner has indicated that the additional
pavement is necessary to provide sufficient parking of two vehicles in the driveway. The
property is improved with a one -car garage. The property to the north, which would be the
most impacted by the request, has 'submitted a letter in support of the variation. The
increased pavement width does not contribute to a lot coverage problem.
No major concerns were expressed by other Village staff. Engineering and Inspection
Services note that the grading shall be maintained so that existing drainage patterns are not
altered. Inspection Services also suggested that the driveway be tapered to 15 feet at the
property line and make the approach 15 feet wide with a 2 foot flare at the curb.
0
Staff has no objections to this request noting that the closest neighbor has indicated support
of the variation.
The additional pavement does not appear to significantly alter the character of the
neighborhood, as there are other wider driveways in this block.
Staff would recommend that the variation be approved with the condition that the driveway
be tapered to 15 feet at the property line and the approach be 15 feet wide with a 2 foot
flare at the curb.
DMC:hg
CAF
4/8/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 906 SEE GWUN
WHEREAS, Kenneth T. Niebuhr (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 906 See Gwun (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 58 in Schauilje and Kurth Inc., Sunset Heights a
Subdivision of the East 110 feet (as measured on the
north line) of that part of the east half (1/2) of the
Northwest Quarter (1/4) of Section 14, Township 41 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying
north of the north line of Golf Road; also that part of
the west half (1/2) of the northeast quarter (1/4)
(except the east 7.38 chains thereof, as measured on the
north line thereof) of Section 14, aforesaid, lying north
of the north line of Golf Road, in Cook County, Illinois,
according to plat recorded November 21, 1955 as Document
No. 16426536
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow
an existing driveway to be replaced with a twenty foot (201) wide
driveway; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 16-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of March,
1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Prospect Hergld on the 10th day of March, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 16-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway twenty foot (201) in
width.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
ZBA 16-V-92
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WkL-
FROM: DAVID NL CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 14, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-13-A-92, TEXT AMENDMENT
As you will remember, this amendment provides a new section on non -conforming uses and
structures for the Zoning Ordinance.
The Village Board concurred with the Zoning Board of Appeals recommendation on this
matter at their April 7 meeting, and an ordinance has been prepared for first reading.
During the public hearing, members of the Zoning Board of Appeals discussed how this
amendment would be a benefit to residents during the spring and summer building permit
seasons. For this reason, members of the Zoning Board of Appeals asked that I suggest that
the Village Board waive first reading of this ordinance, and pass the ordinance on second
reading at the April 21 meeting.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, 1� E MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 2, 1992
SUBJECT- ZBA-13-A-91, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a request to amend Section 14.107. The amendment will amend the non -conforming uses
in its entirety and provide a revised Section 14.107 on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures
and Uses.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meetings on March 12 and
26, 1992. At the meetings, Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, summarized
the request for the Zoning Board and indicated that the current provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance on non -conforming uses are adequate but that they do not make a proper
distinction between non -conforming uses and structures.
Mr. Clements indicated that it is important that the Zoning Ordinance specifically address
uses that don't meet the requirements of a zoning district and how such uses are eliminated,
changed or expanded. Also, there should be requirements that address structures that don't
meet bulk requirements of a zoning district, and how such structures are repaired or
enlarged. The current ordinance allows buildings built prior to December 31, 1964 or in
Cook County and annexed to the Village which are non -conforming structures to be
extended without regard to the current requirements. Mr. Clements feels that this provision
needs to be changed so that all existing structures meet the current provisions.
Mr. Clements indicated that the proposed wording for non -conforming structures allows for
them to be enlarged, maintained or repaired, but that no new non -conformity should be
created. The draft language states that non -conforming driveways, patios and sidewalks may
be replaced in the same location, however, such structures should meet the applicable lot
coverage requirements.
The proposed amendment allows for non -conformities on lots 50 feet or less to be extended
in the required rear yard or side yard, provided that the non -conformity is no more than
50% of the current rear yard or side yard requirement.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. The members generally felt that the
proposed language simplifies the process in the Zoning Ordinance and is a more reasonable
standard for residents to meet.
John Fulton Dixon
April 2, 1992
Page 2
Chairman Gil Basnik felt that the purpose of a non -conforming section is to gradually phase
out non -conforming structures and felt that the 50% provision did not meet his objective.
He felt that all additions to non -conforming structures should meet current standards. This
also gives adjoining property owners an ability to comment on a variation application.
The Zoning Board members had considerable discussion on the proposed language and its
impact on current ordinance provisions and the types of activity in the community. The
majority of the members felt that the changes were positive and that the amendment was
being done at this time so that spring and summer construction could occur and that many
property owners would not have to file manor variation requests and appear before the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
Accordingly, by a 6-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
amendments to Section 14.107 of the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance as presented by
staff.
DMC:hg
3/19/92 Revision
ARTICLE
Non -Conforming Buildings, Structures and Uses
The purpose of this Article is to provide for the regulations of non -conforming
buildings, structures and uses, and to specify those circumstances and conditions under which
those non -conforming buildings, structures and uses shall be permitted to continue.
Buildings and structures which do not conform to the bulk regulations of any zoning
district or any other provision of this ordinance shall be subject to the following regulations:
a. Ability to Continue Non -Conforming Building or Structure
Any lawfully established non -conforming building or structure which is devoted
to a permitted use in a zoning district may continue to be used for any
permitted use.
b. Enlargement, Repair, Alterations, and Replacement
Any non -conforming building or structure may be enlarged, maintained,
repaired or altered, provided that no such enlargement, maintenance, repair
or alteration shall either create an additional non -conformity or increase the
extent of the existing non -conformity. However, on lots 50 feet or less in
width, a non -conforming building or structure may be extended in a required
rear yard or side yard, provided that such non -conformity is no more than 50%
of the current rear yard or sideyard requirement.
In residential zoning districts, existing non -conforming driveways, patios and
sidewalks may be replaced in the same location without complying with the
bulk regulations of this ordinance. However, any such replacement structure
must meet applicable lot coverage requirements.
C. Damage or Destruction
In the event that any non -conforming building or structure is damaged or
destroyed to the extent of more than fifty percent (50%) of the replacement
value of such building or structure, such building or structure shall not be
rebuilt or restored unless it conforms to all regulations of the zoning district
in which it is located.
When such building or structure is damaged by any means to less than fifty
percent (50%) of replacement value, such building or structure may be
reconstructed or repaired, provided that such repair or restoration begin and
is pursued to completion within one year of the date of such damage. Any
such repair or restoration shall be done in compliance with current building
codes.
A use in a building, structure, or on vacant land, which is not a permitted use in the
zoning district in which the use is located, shall be considered a non -conforming use
and subject to the provisions below:
a. Ability to Continue Non -Conforming Use
Any existing use of part or all of a building, structure or non-
r1fo ng use
of land, may be continued as long as it meets the requirements
of this Section.
b. Repair and Maintenance
Normal maintenance and incidental repair or replacement, and installation or
relocation of non-bearing walls, non-bearing partitions, fixtures, wiring or
plumbing, may be performed on any building or structure that is devoted in
whole or in part to a non -conforming use. Any such repair or maintenance
shall be done in compliance with current building codes.
C. Expansion
A non -conforming use shall not be extended, expanded, enlarged or increased
in intensity in any building or structure.
d. Relocation
No building or structure that is occupied in whole or in part by a non-
conforming use shall be relocated to any other location unless the entire
building or structure and the use thereof shall conform to all regulations in
the zoning district.
e. Change In Use
A non -conforming use of land or of a building or structure shall not be
changed to any other use than a use permitted in the zoning district When
such non -conforming use has been changed to a permitted use, the building
or structure shall only be used thereafter for a use permitted in the zoning
district.
Discontinuance
When a non -conforming use of part or all of a building or structure, or non-
conforming use of land, is discontinued or abandoned for a period of 180
consecutive days, such use shall not be re-established or resumed. Any
subsequent use of such building, structure or land shall comply with all
regulations of the zoning district.
9. Damage or Destruction
In the event that any building or structure which is occupied in whole or in
part by a non -conforming use is damaged or destroyed to the extent of more
than fifty percent (50%) of replacement value of the building or structure,
such building or structure shall not be restored unless such building or
structure and the use thereof conform to all the regulations of the zoning
district. When such damage or destruction is fifty percent (50%) or less of
replacement value of the building or structure immediately prior to such
damage, the building or structure may be repaired or reconstructed and used
for the same non -conforming purpose, provided such repair or damage
completed within 12 months of the date of the damage or destruction. Any
such repair shall be done in compliance with current building codes.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 13-A-92 Hearing Date: March 12, 1992
and March 26, 1992
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY: N/A
PUBLICATION DATE: February 26, 1992
REQUEST: To amend in its entirety Section 14.107 Non-
conforming Uses of Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to provide a revised Section 14.107
on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures, and -
Uses.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Mr. Clements explained that this is a public hearing that was continued from March 12 for
the purpose of making several minor changes to the originally submitted language. Mr.
Clements stated that the text had been amended as requested by the Zoning Board of
Appeals. He pointed out that the major change was in Item B of Non -conforming Buildings
and Structures and provided for non -conformities on lots 50 feet or less for a non-
conforming building or structure to be extended in the required rear yard or side yard,
provided that the non -conformity is no more than 50% of the current rear yard or side yard
requirement. Mr. Clements stated that this was believed to be a better compromise
between the initial draft language that required any proposed addition or improvement on
a lot to meet the current setback requirements.
Mr. Clements again explained that the current Zoning Ordinance allows any non -conformity
to be extended on a home built prior to December, 1964; or any home built in Cook County
and annexed to Mount Prospect. Mr. Clements pointed out that these two circumstances
provide for structures to be perpetually grandfathered and not subject to any ordinance
requirements. Mr. Clements stated that this proposed language allowed reasonable
additions to buildings on 50 foot lots provided that the additions would at least meet 50%
of the ordinance requirement.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12/26, 1992
Page 2
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was believed that this was a good
compromise that addresses the types of issues that the Zoning Board deals with on 50 foot
lots.
Mrs. Skowron and Mr. Lannon pointed out that this is more restrictive than the current
ordinance which has the December, 1964 and the Cook County provisions, but it is also a
better alternative to require any new construction or addition on a lot to meet current
setback requirements.
Chairman Basnik indicated that he was not at the March 12 meeting but that he had some
concerns with the proposed language. The Chairman believed that any addition or new
construction on any lot should meet the current setback requirements or a variation
requested. Mr. Basnik used several examples on non -conforming structures and how
additions to non -conforming structures could adversely affect a neighboring property.
Because of concern for adjoining property owners, Mr. Basnik believed that any non-
conforming situation should require a variation so that adjoining property owners could have
an opportunity to review the request.
Zoning Board members reminded Chairman Basnik that the existing ordinance allowed any
non -conformity to be extended without requiring a variation, and that the two circumstances
of buildings built before December, 1964 and buildings built in Cook County and annexed
to Mount Prospect provided that any type of addition to a building without a public hearing.
Members of the Zoning Board discussed their thinking at the March 12 meeting and
indicated how this proposed language was more restrictive than the current provisions, but
allowed reasonable additions within 50% of the setback requirement to occur.
Chairman Basnik stated that he understood the existing non -conforming section and the
draft language but it was his opinion that any addition to a non -conforming structure should
require a variation. The Chairman stated that the purpose of a non -conforming section is
to gradually phase out non -conforming structures and that as long as a new ordinance is
being prepared the Zoning Board should look with compliance with all the new
requirements, and not set up a 50% provision.
The Zoning Board then generally discussed the request and Mr. Lannon pointed out that
he believed the draft language was a good attempt at recognizing the types of improvements
that are made on 50 foot lots in the Village and he believed that deleting the December
1964 provision and the Cook County provision was an improvement to the Zoning
Ordinance. He also explained that this amendment was being done at this time so that
spring and summer construction could occur and that many property owners would not have
to file minor variation requests and appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The Zoning Board then continued discussion of the request and considerable discussion
ensued concerning the draft language and its impact on Current ordinance provisions and
the types of activity in the community.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12/26, 1992
Page 3
Chairman Basnik then asked for a motion on the request, and Mr. Prettrager moved that
the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a revised Section 14.107 on non-
conforming buildings and structures and uses. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Skowron.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron and Cassidy
NAYS: Basnik
Motion carried by a vote of 6-1.
Chairman Basnik voted in opposition to the request and again explained that he believed
any new construction on a_lot should meet current ordinance requirements or a variation
should be requested.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
6 -NI. ��
David M. Clements
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 13-A-92
Hearing Date: March 12, 1992
PETITIONER:
Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
N/A
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 26, 1992
REQUEST:
To amend in its entirety Section 14.107 Non-
conforming Uses of Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to provide a revised Section 14.107
on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures, and
Uses.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Dennis Saviano
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Two residents
Mr. Cassidy introduced the only agenda item of the evening being a request by the Village
of Mount Prospect to amend Section 14.107,
Non -conforming Uses of the Zoning Ordinance
in its entirety, and provide a revised section on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures, and
Uses.
David Clements, Director of Planning, summarized the request for the Zoning Board of
Appeals and indicated that the current provisions of the Zoning Ordinance on non-
conforming uses are adequate, but that they do not make a proper distinction between non-
conforming uses and structures. Mr. Clements explained that it's important that the Zoning
Ordinance specifically address conditions for non -conforming uses, and that there be specific
conditions for non -conforming structures which do not meet the bulk requirements of the
zoning district.
Mr. Clements then described the non -conforming uses, Section 14.107 in the Zoning
Ordinance, and used an example that the ordinance states that a non -conforming use cannot
be expanded. Mr Clements indicated that this expansion is not defined, and that it can be
interpreted that even a conforming addition to a non -conforming structure is prohibited.
Mr. Clements stated that this example indicates the difficulty in administering this section
of the ordinance.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12; 1992
Page 2
He also stated that a further provision provides that buildings built prior to December 31,
1964 or in Cook County and annexed to the Village, meet different requirements for
additions. Mr. Clements stated that this section of the ordinance allows any non-
conforming structure to be extended without regard for current requirements. Mr. Clements
stated that the disadvantage to this section is that sometimes it is difficult to determine the
actual age of a building when looking at the December 1964 provisions, but that, more
importantly, he stated that he was concerned about the ordinance accepting development
in Cook County and allowing expansions to structures built in Cook County that did not
meet Mount Prospect requirements.
Mr. Clements then summarized the proposed wording for non -conforming structures and
indicated that he believes it's reasonable that non -conforming structures can be enlarged,
maintained or repaired, bui that no new non -conformity should be created. Mr. Clements
also pointed out that the draft language states that non -conforming driveways, patios, and
sidewalks may be replaced in the same location; however, such structures should meet the
applicable lot coverage requirements. Mr. Clements then described the proposed wording
on non -conforming uses and indicated that this wording better defined how a non-
conforming use within a building can be expanded or enlarged, or changed to other uses.
Mr. Clements then suggested that the Zoning Board consider an alternative that would allow
non -conforming structures on 50 foot lots to have a certain non -conformity extended,
provided that the non -conformity is no more than 50% of the current ordinance
requirement. Mr. Clements stated that this would be an example of addressing particular
development problems on 50 foot lots and this would still allow reasonable flexibility for
certain kinds of room additions and improvements.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then discussed the request. Mr. Cassidy indicated that he
believed that the new section is an attempt to modernize standards on non -conforming uses
and structures, and that he agreed that there should be more control over structures built
in Cook County and annexed to Mount Prospect.
Mr. Lannon indicated that he believed that it's reasonable to allow extension of non-
conforming structures up to 50% of the ordinance requirement on a 50 foot lot, but pointed
out that he would be opposed to any such extension in a required front yard.
Mr. Lannon also explained the reasons for proceeding with this amendment at this time; and
noted that he believed this would be an important change to make,in the Zoning Ordinance
prior to spring construction season, when there is a heavier number of building permits
being reviewed. Mr. Lannon believed that the proposed amendment might eliminate some
more minor variation requests and help residents get spring projects underway quicker.
The Zoning Board then generally discussed the concept of allowing non -conforming
driveways, patios and sidewalks to remain in their present location. Mr. Cassidy stated that
there may be circumstances where an existing 24 foot driveway, for example, creates storm
water run-off problems on a neighboring property.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12, 1992
Page 3
Mrs. Skowron stated that she was concerned, for example, about a replacement of a 30 foot
driveway and the overall appearance of that amount of paving in a front yard. Mr.
Clements explained that this particular section is tied back to only allowing replacement
of those types of structures if the overall lot coverage is within the permitted maximum of
the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Clements stated that in this way there would be more open
space on a lot to absorb storm water run-off than there would be impervious surface. In
theory existing conditions would not be made worse by replacing such a structure.
Mrs. Skowron asked how much time would be saved in the permit process with these
amendments, and Mr. Clements stated that the building permits for minor structures such
as driveways, are typically issued within a day or two, but that most permits are finished up
within a requirement of 20 days in the Building Code.
Mr. Brettrager stated that the proposed wording simplifies the process in the Zoning
Ordinance and is a more reasonable standard for residents to meet.
Mr. Lannon stated that this wording helps relieve many burdens that are caused on residents
and that he believed the advantages outweighed the disadvantages. Mr. Clements stated
that he believed there could always be an extreme situation pointed out or discussed that
could not be remedied with these requirements, but that allowing more reasonable
replacements of structures and additions to buildings would benefit more residents in the
long run than occasions where the worse case example would be found.
Mr. Clements then discussed the timetable for moving this item on to the Village Board and
the Zoning Board discussed the possibility of asking the Village Board to waive second
reading to complete this amendment as soon as possible so it could be in place for spring
construction.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Cassidy asked Mr. Clements to revise the wording
in a proposed amendment as discussed; and to bring the item back to the Zoning Board for
their meeting of March 26. Mr. Lannon moved that the meeting be continued to March 26
for a final review of the revised section of non -conforming uses and structures. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Cassidy
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
Respectfully submitted,
�'P)' U#WAK ��'
David M. Clements
.,ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSI _1__T
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN V00"
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 3, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-13-A-91
APPLICANT: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REQUEST
This application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance was filed by the Village of
Mount Prospect. The application was filed to amend in its entirety Section 14.107, Non -
Conforming Uses, and to provide a revised Section 14.107 on Non -conforming Buildings,
Structures and Uses.
HFC
Summary of application: The current provisions of the Zoning Ordinance on non-
conforming uses are adequate, but they do not make a proper distinction between non-
conforming uses and non -conforming structures. Staff believes that it is important that the
Zoning Ordinance specifically address uses that don't meet the requirements of a zoning
district and how such uses are eliminated, changed or expanded. Also, there should be
requirements that address structures that don't meet bulk requirements of a zoning district,
and how such structures are repaired and enlarged.
A draft of the new section is attached, as is a copy of the existing section. Also, please note
that the proposed includes provisions to allow existing driveways, patios and sidewalks to be
replaced without meeting bulk regulations, with the exception of applicable lot coverage
requirements.
MER DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
All Village departments reviewed the proposed section, and there were no significant
comments.
SUMMARY&MOMMENDATIO
Staff would recommend approval of the revised non -conforming section, in order to have
specific regulations for non -conforming uses and structures in the Zoning Ordinance.
DMC:hg
DC/caf
4/14/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF
CHAPTER 14 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, Village of Mount Prospect, through it administration,
(hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application
for a text amendment to Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a text amendment to section 14.107
entitled "Nonconforming Uses" of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for text
amendment to Section 14.107, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 13-
A-92, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect on the 12th day of March, 1992 and the 26th day of March,
1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been
published in the MolInt Prospect Herald on the 26th day of February,
1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; nd
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA
13-A-92 and have determined that the best interests of the Village
of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Section 14.107 entitled "Nonconforming Uses" of
Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety;
so that hereinafter said Section 14.107 shall be and read as
follows:
Sec. 14.107. Non -Conforming Buildings, Structures and Uses
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Section 14.107 is to provide for the
regulations of non -conforming buildings, structures and uses,
and to specify those circumstances and conditions under which
those non -conforming buildings, structures and uses shall be
permitted to continue.
B. Non -Conforming Buildings and Structures
Buildings and structures which do not conform to the bulk
regulations of any zoning district or any other provision of
this ordinance shall be subject to the following regulations:
1. Ability to Continue Non -Conforming Building or
7.M—MA
Ap!=
In
Section 14.107
Page 2 of 4
Structure
Any lawfully established non -conforming building or
structure which is devoted to a permitted use in a
zoning district may continue to be used for any
permitted use.
2. Enlargement, Repair, Alterations, and Replacement
Any non -conforming building or structure may be
enlarged, maintained, repaired or altered, provided
that no such enlargement, maintenance, repair or
alteration shall either create an additional non-
conformity or increase the extent of the existing
non -conformity. However, on lots 50 feet or less
in width, a non -conforming building or structure may,
be extended in a required rear yard or side yard,
provided that such non -conformity is no more than
50% of the current rear yard or sideyard
requirement.
In residential zoning districts, existing non-
conforming driveways, patios and sidewalks may be
replaced in the same location without complying with
the bulk regulations of this ordinance. However,
any such replacement structure must meet applicable
lot coverage requirements.
3. Damage or Destruction
In the event that any non -conforming building or
structure is damaged or destroyed to the extent of
more than fifty percent (50%) of the replacement
value of such building or structure, such building
or structure shall not be rebuilt or restored unless
it conforms to all regulations of the zoning
district in which it is located.
When such building or structure is damaged by any
means to less than fifty percent (50%) of
replacement value, such building or structure may
be reconstructed or repaired, provided that such
repair or restoration begin and is pursued to
completion within one year of the date of such
damage. Any such repair or restoration shall be
done in compliance with current building codes.
C. Non -Conforming Uses
A use in a building, structure, or on vacant land, which is
not a permitted use in the zoning district in which the use
is located, shall be considered a non -conforming use and
subject to the provisions below: I
1. Ability to Continue Non -Conforming Use
Any existing non -conforming use of part or all of a
building, structure or non -conforming use of land, may
be continued as long as it meets the requirements of this
Section.
2. Repair and Maintenance
Normal maintenance and incidental repair or replacement,
and installation or relocation of non-bearing walls, non-
Section 14.107
Page 3 of 4
bearing partitions, fixtures, wiring or plm;bing, may be
performed on any building or structure that is devoted
in whole or in part to a non -conforming use. Any such
repair or maintenance shall be done in ompliance with
current building codes.
3. Expansion
A non -conforming use shall not be extended, expanded,
enlarged or increased in intensity in any building or
structure.
4. Relocation
No building or structure that is occupied in whole or in
part by a non -conforming use shall be relocated to any
other location unless the entire building or structure
and the use thereof shall conform to all regulations in
the zoning district.
5. Change In Use
A non -conforming use of land or of a building or
structure shall not be changed to any other use than a
use permitted in the zoning district. when such non-
conforming use has been changed to a permitted use, the
building or structure shall only be used thereafter for
a use permitted in the zoning district.
6. Discontinuance
When a non -conforming use of part or all of a'building
or structure, or non -conforming use of land, is
discontinued or abandoned for a period of 180 consecutive
days, such use shall not be re-established or resumed.
Any subsequent use of such building, structure or land
shall comply with all regulations of the zoning district.
7. Damage or Destruction
In the event that any building or structure which is
occupied in whole or in part by a non -conforming use is
damaged or destroyed to the extent of more than fifty
percent (50%) of replacement value of the building or
structure, such building or structure shall not be
restored unless such building or structure and the use
thereof conform to all the regulations of the zoning
district. When such damage or destruction is fifty
percent (50%) or less of replacement value of the
building or structure immediately prior to such damage,
the building or structure may be repaired or
reconstructed and used for the same non -conforming
purpose, provided such repair or damage completed within
12 months of the date of the damage or destruction. Any
such repair shall be done in compliance with current
building codes. 11
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
Section 14.107
Page 4 of 4
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS TO BORROW FUNDS FROM
THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND.
WHEREAS the VILLAGE of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois (the "VILLAGE"), operates its sewerage. system (the
"System") and in accordance with the provisions of Article Sev-
en, Section Six of the Illinois State Constitution; and
WHEREAS the PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the.
VILLAGE and in the best interests of public health, safety and
welfare to improve the System, including the following:
The project consists of improvements to the village's sani-
tary sewer system and combined sewer system in selected areas of
the Village. These areas are referred to as the See-Gwun and
Golf Flooding Area, Prospect Manor and North Main Flooding Area,
Central and Wa-Pella Flooding Area, See-Gwun and Milburn Sani-
tary Area and Hatlen Heights Sanitary Area and Fairview Gardens
Sanitary Area. I
Improvements in the See -Gwen and Golf Flooding Area include
construction of a separate relief storm sewer on Sunset
Road, See -Gwen Avenue, and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue connecting to an
existing storm sewer at Lonnquist Boulevard. Improvements
in the Prospect Manor and North Main Flooding Area include
construction of a combined parallel relief sewer on -High-
land Street, Emerson Street, Gregory Street, and crossing
Rand Road connecting to the MWRDGC TARP system. Lateral
combined relief sewerswillalso be constructed north of
Highland Street on Fairview Avenue, Prospect Manor Avenue,
Eastwood Avenue, Elmhurst Avenue, Russel Avenue and Main
Street. Lateral Combined relief sewers will also be con-
structed from Main Street to Emerson Street on Memory Lane
and Gregory Street. Improvements in the Central and Wa-
Pella Flooding Area include construction.of a separate
relief storm sewer on Central Road, Wa-Pella Avenue,
Gowando Ave. and Hi-Lusi Avenue to Weller's Creek. A new
discharge to Weller's Creek will be constructed at Hi-Lusi
Avenue. Improvements in the See -Gwen and Milburn Sanitary
Area include construction on a sanitary relief pump station
on Lincoln Street east of We -Go Trail. Improvements in the
Hatlen Heights Sanitary Area include construction of over-
sized sanitary relief/storage sewers on Hatlen Avenue from
Lincoln Street to Bonita Avenue. Improvements. in the
Fairview Gardens Sanitary Area include rehabilitation of
the existing sanitary lift station on Horner Lane and con-
struction of oversized sanitary relief/storage sewers on
Horner Lane, Thayer Street, and Stevenson Lane together
with any land or rights in land and all electrical, mechani-
cal or other services necessary, useful or advisable to
such construction and installation (the "Project"), all in
accordance with the plans and specifications therefore
prepared by consulting engineers to the VILLAGE.. and
WHEREAS the estimated cost of constructing and install-
ing the Project, including engineering, legal, financial, and
other related expenses, is $9,961,000, and there are insuffi-
cient funds on hand and lawfully available to pay such costs; and
WHEREAS such costs are expected to be paid for with a
loan to the VILLAGE from the Illinois Environmental Protection.
Agency through the Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund, said
loan to be repaid from a Home Rule Retailers Occupation Tax of
one quarter of one percent (.25%) of the gross receipts and such
loan is authorized to be accepted at this time pursuant to the
Act, and
WHEREAS pursuant to and in accordance with the provi-
sions of the Act, the VILLAGE is authorized to borrow funds from
the Water Pollution Control Revolving Loan Fund in the aggregate
ce-
principal amount of $9,961,000 for the purpose of providing
funds to pay the costs of the Project; and
WHEREAS , the loan to the VILLAGE shall be made pursu-
ant to a Loan Agreement, including certain terms and conditions,
between the VILLAGE and the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency;
NOW THEREFORE be it ordained by the PRESIDENT AND
BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the VILLAGE of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois as follows:
SECTION ONE. INCORPORATION OF PREAMBLES
The Corporate Authorities hereby find that the recit-
als contained in the preambles to this ordinance are true and
correct and do incorporate them into thi-s, ordinance by this
reference.
SECTION TWO. DETERMINATION'TO BORROW FUNDS
It is necessary and in the best interests of the VIL-
LAGE to construct the Project for the public health, safety and
welfare, in accordance with the plans and specifications, as
described, that the System continue to be operated in accordance
with the provisions of the Act, and that for the purpose of
constructing the Project, it is hereby authorized that funds be
borrowed by the VILLAGE in an aggregate principal amount not to
exceed $9,961,000.
SECTION THREE. ADDITIONAL ORDINANCES
The Corporate Authorities may adopt additional ordi-
nances or proceedings supplementing or amending this Ordinance
providing for the entering into the Loan Agreement with the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, prescribing all the
details of said Loan Agreement, and providing for the collec-
tion, segregation and distribution of the revenues of the sales
tax, so long as the maximum amount of said Loan Agreement as set
forth in this Ordinance is not exceeded and there is no material
change in the Project or purposes described herein. Such addi-
tional ordinances or proceedings shall in all instances become
effective in accordance with the Act and other applicable law.
This Ordinance, together with such additional ordinances or
proceedings, shall constitute complete authority for the enter-
ing into of said Loan Agreement under applicable law.
However, notwithstanding the above, the VILLAGE may
not adopt additional ordinances or amendments which
provide for any substantive or material change in the
scope and intent of this ordinance, including but not
limited to interest rate, preference or priority of
any other ordinance with this Ordinance, parity of any
other ordinance with this Ordinance, or otherwise
alter or impair the obligation of the VILLAGE to pay
the principal and interest due to the Water Pollution
Control Revolving Fund without the written consent of
the Illinois Environmental, Protection Agency.
SECTION FOUR. LOAN NOT INDEBTEDNESS OF VILLAGE
Repayment of the loan to the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency by the VILLAGE pursuant.to this Ordinance is
to be solely from the revenue derived from a one quarter of one
percent (.253) sales tax and the loan does not constitute an
indebtedness of the VILLAGE within. the meaning of any constitu-
tional or statutory limitation.
SECTION FIVE. ACCEPTANCE OF LOAN AGREEMENT
The PRESIDENT and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES hereby author-
ize acceptance of the offer of a loan through the Water Pollu-
tion Control Revolving Fund, including all terms and conditions
of the Loan Agreement as well as all special conditions con-
tained therein and made a part thereof by reference. The PRESI-
DENT and BOARD OF TRUSTEES further agree that the loan funds
awarded shall be used solely for the purposes of the project as
approved by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement.
SECTION SIX. AUTHORIZATION OF PRESIDENT'TO EXECUTE
THE LOAN AGREEMENT
The PRESIDENT is hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Loan Agreement with the Illinois Environmental Pro-
tection Agency on or before 19_.
SECTION SEVEN. SEVERABILITY
If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of this
ordinance shall be held invalid, the invalidity of such section,
paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the other
provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION EIGHT. REPEALER
All ordinances, resolutions or orders, or parts there-
of, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are to the
extent of such conflict hereby repealed.
SECTION NINE. This ordinance shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Passed and approved this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley - PRESIDENT
VILLAGE of Mount Prospect
Cook County, Illinois
Attest:
Carol A. Fields - VILLAGE Clerk
VILLAGE of Mount Prospect
Cook County, Illinois
IEPALOAN.ORD/FILES/SEWERS
BH/caf
3/27/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.115 OF CHAPTER 9
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 9.115.B entitled "Commercial Use of
Sidewalk Space, Special Permit" of Chapter 9 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended in its
entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 9.115.B of Chapter 9
shall be and read as follows:
B. Under no circumstances shall the use of any
sidewalk for restaurant purposes reduce the
portion of the sidewalk left open for
pedestrian travel to less than four feet (41).
Further, in order to prevent the restaurant
space from encroaching in front of another
merchant's establishment, the boundaries of the
outdoor space shall not extend laterally beyond
the sidewalls of the interior space at the
point where the sidewalls meet the sidewalk."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
0
BH/ caf
4/1/92
4/8/92
[0) 0 0 0 z K-1 k, to) as z cam
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 23
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 23.101 entitled "Disorderly Conduct" of
Chapter 23 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by adding thereto paragraph 16; so that
hereinafter said Section 23.101 shall include the following:
16. Is in possession of an alcoholic beverage in a public
street or other public place; unless the alcoholic
beverage is in its original container with the seal
unbroken or unless the possession is on the premises of
an establishment holding a valid Village of Mount
Prospect liquor license. For the purpose of this
subsection, a public place shall include, but not be
limited to, all Village streets, Village owned parking
facilities, all parking lots and common areas serving
commercial establishments and all parking areas and
common areas serving multi -family residential structures
containing four or more dwelling units, provided that
this prohibition shall apply to such multi -family common
areas only if the owner, manager, or owners association
has stated, in writing, that it is the intention of the
ownership of such owner of common area that the
prohibition be applied. The written statement may
reserve the right of management to give one day permits
for residents or tenants to hold social gatherings in a
common area."
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
�J_
BH/caf
3/26/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVIII OF CHAPTER 23
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PRQSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 23.1805 entitled "Tenant Obligations"
of Chapter 23 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended,
is hereby further amended by adding thereto paragraph 111,11; so that
hereinafter said Section 23.1805 shall include the following:
L. Not be in possession of any alcoholic beverage in a public
street or other public place unless the alcoholic beverage is
in its original container with the seal unbroken. For the
purpose of this subsection, a public place shall include, but
not be limited to, all Village streets and all parking areas
and common areas serving multi -family residential structures
containing four or more dwelling units, provided that this
prohibition shall apply to such multi -family common areas only
if the owner, manager, or owners association has stated, in
writing, that it is the intention of the ownership of such
owner of common area that the prohibition be applied. The
written statement may reserve the right of management to give
one day permits for residents or tenants to hold social
gatherings in a common area."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
I
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM:
David C. Jepson, Finance Directof;�'
DATE:
April 3, 1992
SUBJECT:
Proposed Water and Sewer Rate Increase
In a March 1991 report on Water Fund expenditures and rates covering the past five years
and projections of needs for the next five years, the conclusion was reached that the Village
would need to increase water rates approximately 5% a year during this period. The report
showed that the Water Fund has a healthy fund balance and that the balance would be used
to fund major projects as well as to moderate future rate increases. If modest increases are
not implemented on an annual basis, future rate increases would need to be much greater
than the amounts proposed.
The projections in the 1991 report are still valid, and anticipated the 1991-1992 draw down
of fund balance of $265,600 and an expected $180,200 in 1992-1993. Additionally, the
funding of the renovation of the downtown water tank from the existing fund balance was
anticipated when future rate increases were developed. Accordingly, a combined water and
sewer rate increase of $.13 per 1,000 gallons was included in the 1992-1993 budget. The
current rate is $2.62 per 1,000 gallons and with the increase the new rate will be $2.75 per
1,000 gallons.
The attached ordinance provides for this increase and will be for all water used after
April 30, 1992 and will actually appear for the first time on the bills dated June 30, 1992.
DCJ/sm
I qd�
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE V ENTITLED
"METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Ar4ie V entitled "Meters and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Code
,a
(A) By amending Subsections A and B of Section 22.504.2 to read as follows:
A. All Village users within the Village, having a direct or indirect
connection with Village water mains or pipes shall pay the following
rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $2.50
B. All Village users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a
direct or indirect connection with Village water mains or pipes shall
pay the following rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons
consumed or portion thereof $5.00
(B) By amending Subsection C of Section 22.504.3 to read as follows:
C. Rate:
1. All Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village,
having a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer and
water mains or pipes shall pay the following sewer rate, based upon
the amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished:
Per 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $0.25
2. All Village sewer users within the corporate limits of the Village
having a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer mains
or pipes and not with the Village water mains or pipes, shall pay a
flat rate of:
Per month per dwelling unit $2.25
3. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having
a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer and water
mains or pipes, shall pay the following sewer rate based upon the
amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished:
Per 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $0.25
4. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having
a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer mains or
pipes, but not with Village water mains or pipes, shall pay a flat
rate of:
Per month per dwelling unit $2.25
SECTION TWO: The water and sewer rates established by Section One of this Ordinance
shall be effective for water used subsequent to April 30, 1992.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect May 1, 1992
following its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in accordance with
law.
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1 1992.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Village President
CAF/
4/3//92
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XXXIV OF CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 4.1001.B of Chapter 11 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended in
its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 11.3505.B of Chapter
11 shall be and read as follows:
11B. Any Class II establishment may receive up to a maximum of four
(4) inspections and/or reinspections per year without
additional charge. Upon the fifth (5th) inspection and/or
reinspection and every inspection and/or reinspection
thereafter, as deemed necessary by the Department of
Inspection Services, the licensee shall pay an additional
inspection service charge of either Fifty Dollars ($50.00) or
one quarter (1/4) of the annual business license fee
established in subsection A of Section 11.3405, whichever is
greater. 11
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
M
Public Notice
A Budget Hoare, will be held on Audi 21, 1992 for all interest.
lip
ad citizens 01 the Vil all of Mount prospect, ljhncY&The following
""' Yea, beginr'Anti May 1, 1992.�
bo a posed to'
"i140'F's,Pdm'
Spacial
i 'er of Fund
.pa _"_a Funds
4,751,365
capital.b 'Funds .1,975,896
proiaacts
For-
eforn.,Service 3095415
6.745.,665
Pension Funds .... 1:942:500
Totals......... . $45,914,000
Less Interfund Transfers ....ts98.7
0
Totals - Village Funds ..._ � �::: ...... � .... $45,321.300%%
Library Fund ........ .............. _ _ _2.970,425
Totals -Village and Library Foods_ ... __ $49,991,725
The meetina will be held in the Mount P --t A. -i— r—t.,
and oral comments.
comment,
TON DIXON
Publilshad In Mt. Pr0SPQCt AreldIA6708,199Z
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director QR,-,
17
DATE: April 1, 1992
SUBJECT: Adoption of Budget Ordinance
An Ordinance providing for an Annual Budget in lieu of an Appropriation Ordinance, a copy of
the Public Notice establishing a Public Hearing on April 21, 1992 and a summary of revenue and
expenditure changes are attached to this memo. The Notice indicates the revised budget amounts
as a result of the changes approved by the Village Board on March 24, 1992 and the inclusion
of the Library's budget request. The summary of budget changes includes the original amount
proposed, the revised amount and the net increase or decrease. Total revised Village revenues
have been decreased from $38,816,395 to $39,643,395 and total revised Village expenditures have
been decreased from $45,368,100 to $45,321,300.
The following procedures are required before the budget can be adopted:
1. Announcement at the Village Board meeting on April 7, 1992 of a public hearing
on the tentative annual budget to be held on April 21, 1992.
2. First reading of the Budget Ordinance on April 7, 1992.
3. Publication of the Public Notice of the Budget Hearing on April 8, 1992 in the
Mount Prospect Herald.
4. Public Hearing on April 21, 1992 on the tentative annual budget.
5. Adoption of the Budget Ordinance on April 21, 1992.
6. Filing a copy of the Budget Ordinance with the County Clerk after adoption.
Revised copies of the budget which will reflect any changes made at the Public Hearing will
then be compiled and will be available prior to May 1, 1992.
DCJ/srn
Enc
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1992-1993 Budget Changes
Revenues
General Fund
1-000-00-4013 Retailers Occupation Tax
1-000-00-4150 State Income Tax
1-000-00-4151 State Sales Tax
1-000-00-4153 State Use Tax
1-000-00-4164 Personal Property Repl Tax
General Fund Changes
All Other General Fund Revenues
Revised General Fund Revenues
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
22-000-00-4157 MFT Allocation
All Other MFT Fund Revenues
Revised MFT Fund'Revenues
Capital Improvement Fund
51-000-00-4152 State Income Tax Surcharge
All Other Capital Impry Revenues
Revised Capital Impry Revenues
All Other Village Funds
Total Village Revenues
Less: Interfund Transfers
Revised Village Revenues
92-93 92-93
Proposed Revised Increase or
Budget Budget <Decrease>
$ 6,100,000 $ 6,000,000 $< 100,000>
2,050,000 2,070,000 20,000
85,000 66,500 < 18,500>
250,000 265,000 15,000
105,000103QQO < 2.000>
$ 8,590,000 8,504,500 $< 85,500>,
7j38.500 7,838,500
$16,428,500 116_24Q 0_00 85,500>
$ 1,100,000 $ 1,047,500 $< 52,500>
50,100
50,100
$ IJ50,100 $ 1,097,600 $< 52,500>
$ 1,025,000 $ 990,000 $< 35,000>
679M0 679,800 -
$ 1,704,800 1 1,669,800 $< 35,000>
$21125.695 $21,125,695 $
$40,409,095 $40,236,095 $< 173,000>
< 592.700> < 592,700>
$39,816,395, $39,643,391 $< 173,000
Library Fund Revenues S $ 2AM425 1 2,870,425
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1992-1993 Budget Changes
Expenditures
92-93 92-93
Proposed Revised Increase or
Budget Budget <Decrease>
General Fund
1-042-04-5843 Overtime - Public Education $ 5,500 $ 7,500 $ 2,000
1-042-04-5844 Overtime - Inspection 4,000 7,000 3,000
1-062-03-6695 Redevelopment Services 15,000 50,000 35,000
1-081-03-5810 P W Overtime - 3,000 3,000
1-081-03-7395 White Light Supplies - 3,000 3,000
Total General Fund Changes $ 24,500 $ 70,500 $ 46,000
All Other General Fund Expenditures 16,404,000 16,404,000
Revised General Fund Expenditures $16,428,500 $16,474,500 $ 46,000
Capital Improvement Fund
51-077-81-8007 District 57 Auditorium $ 300,000 $ 370,000 $ 70,000
51-077-91-8090 New Technology Projects - 50,000 50,000
Total Capital Impry Changes $ 300,000 $ 420,000 $ 120,000
All Other Capital Impry Expenditures L453,960 1,453,960
Revised Capital Impry Expenditures 1,753.260 $ 1,873,960 $ 120,000
Flood Control Const Funds
58-077-65-8103 Stevenson/Thayer Area
59-077-65-8107 Central/WaPella
59-077-65-8109 Hatlen Heights Sewer
Total Flood Control Changes
All Other Flood Control Expend.
Revised Flood Control Expend.
$ 1,300,000 $ - $<1,300,000>
1,750,000 3,650,000 1,900,000
850mo - < 850,000>
$ 3,900,000 $ 3,650,000 < 250,000>
155 800 1.155.800 -
$ 5,055,800 $ 4,805,800 $< 250,000>
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1992-1993 Budget Changes
Expenditures
92-93 92-93
Proposed Revised Increase or
Budget Budget <Decrease>
Vehigle Replacement Fund
48-077-93-8441 Replace 2 Police Vehicles $ - $ 37,200 $ 37,200
All Other Vehicle Replacement Expend546,215546,215
Revised Vehicle Replacement Expend. $ 546,215 $ 583,415 $ 37,200
All Other Village Funds
Total Village Expenditures
Less Interfund Transfers
Revised Village Expenditures
$22,176,325 $22,176,325 $ -
$45,960,800 $45,914,000 $< 46,800>
< 592.700> < 592-700.> -
J45_368,100 $45321,302 $< 46�800>
Library Fund Expenditures Is - a 2,,,870,425 x_2.870.425
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
COMMENCING MAY 1, 1992 TO APRIL 30, 1993 IN LIEU OF
PASSAGE OF AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect in
accordance with Statutes, have provided for the preparation and adoption of an annual
budget in lieu of passage of an Appropriation Ordinance for the fiscal year commencing
May 1, 1992 to April 30, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect for the fiscal
year beginning May 1, 1992 and ending April 30, 1993, as prepared by the Budget Officer
for the Village and submitted to the President and Board of Trustees, was placed on file
in the Office of the Village Clerk on April 7, 1992, for public inspection, as provided by
Statute; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to notice duly published on April 8, 1992, a public hearing was held
by the President and Board of Trustees on said tentative annual budget on April 21, 1992,
as provided by statute; and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said tentative annual budget was reviewed by
the President and Board of Trustees and a copy of said tentative annual budget is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect beginning
May 1, 1992 and ending April 30, 1993, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby approved and adopted as the Annual Budget for the Village of Mount
Prospect for said fiscal year.
SECTION TWO: Within thirty (30) days following the adoption of this Ordinance there
shall be filed with the County Clerk of Cook County a copy thereof duly certified by the
Village Clerk and Estimate of Revenues by source anticipated to be received by the Village
in the fiscal year beginning May 1, 1992 and ending April 30, 1993, duly certified by the
Chief Fiscal Officer.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of April, 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF/
4/16/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RELEASE
OF EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect have met from time to time in executive session for
purposes authorized by the Illinois Open Meetings Act; and
WHEREAS, as required by the Act, the Village Board has kept written
minutes of all such executive sessions; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Public Act 85-1355, the
Mayor and Board of Trustees have met in closed session to review
all closed session minutes; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees have determined that a
need for confidentiality still exists as to the executive session
minutes for the meetings as set forth on Schedule A attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees have further determined
that the minutes of the meetings as noted on Schedule "All attached
hereto no longer require confidential treatment and should be made
available for public inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the executive session minutes from those
meetings as set forth on Schedule "All attached hereto are hereby
released.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to make said minutes available for inspection and copying
in accordance with the standing procedures of the Clerk's office.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
day of
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
1 "AR
F�A
M1
, 1992.
SCHEDULE A
Executive Sessions of the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect were held as listed below. The minutes
that have been determined may be released for public inspection are
indicated by "Release" and those determined as of a confidential
nature indicated by "Not For Release":
January 30, 1990
September 11, 1990
December 19, 1990
January 22, 1991
February 18, 1992
October 8, 1991
October 15, 1991
November 19, 1991
December 10, 1991
January 21, 1992
March 3, 1992
Not For Release
Not For Release
Not For Release
Not For Release
Not For Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
Release
151 q'),
RESOLUTION NO.
1001. ��MIWOAXOIR MUS11012f
WHEREAS, it is desirable to have a Resolution setting forth a policy regarding the
naming of public places and the commemoration of elected officials, employees, residents,
Township, County, State or National worthy individuals and others on plaques, streets,
rooms, buildings, ponds, Village -owned parks, water towers, etc., and;
WHEREAS, since it is unusual for any single individual to have been responsible for a
specific facility, the name of any public building should reflect its functional use to
eliminate confusion by the public of the primary function of the building.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Plaques that commemorate opening of public buildings shall contain
the names of the elected officials who made the decision to construct the building and
the date the building was opened. The names of appropriate appointed and elected
officials may be included at the discretion of the Village Board.
SECTION TWO: At the discretion of the Village Board, one or more commemorative
or dedication plaques may be placed in public buildings to recognize the contribution to
Mount Prospect of Village residents, employees or officials.
SECTION THREE: At the discretion of the Village Board, rooms, streets, lakes,ponds
or other public facilities in the Village may be named after Village residents, employees
or officials to recognize their contribution to Mount Prospect at the Village, Township,
County, State or National level.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Board may, at its discretion, recognize heroic acts or
meritorious service of Village residents, employees or officials in a manner they feel is
appropriate. This may be extended to individuals of Township, County, State or National
prominence if deemed appropriate.
SECTION FIVE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
I
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7=crfytu
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 16, 1992
SUBJ: Bid Results - High Service Pump Modifications
Sealed bids for the construction of high -service Pump modifica-
tions for pumping stations #16 and.#17 were received and opened
at 10:00 a.m. on April 14, 1992. Four bids were received and
the apparent low bidder is Tri -Con Corp. Attached is our consul-
ting engineer, Greeley and Hansen's review of the bids.. it is
their recommendation and I concur, to award a contract to Tri -
Con Corp. in an amount not to exceed $65,860.00.
Funding for this proposed expenditure will be split between two
fiscal years. on Page 147 of the 1991/92 budget, Account
#41-072-05-8031, there is $37,000 allocated and on Page 160 of
the 1992/93 budget, Account #41-072-05-8031, there is $65,000
allocated. This $65,000 will be split $28,860 towards Tri-Con.'s
contract and the remaining $36,140 would be applied towards
design and partial construction of the next phase of our high
service pump replacement program.
4HerbHU&Ai65J'/Ve4
Herbert
ert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
CC: Deputy Director of Public Works
Wat6r/Sewer Superintendent
HIGHSERV/FILES/BIDS
E"CA^8.1.1.011
1AU1 E°ING"01, 'A
°���S
�����
" =°"
4���^��°�
���"°IZZARR.
`'0°.S^^="=
"EA.,"SIS�
ROGER ,=o=
ASSOCIATES:
IO.NI A SAAC"
RICHARD ,MI~"
"".°°°=^ON, �11"
==,.—w-
,O-LO���^
"A"`"°IA11IT
C Ul ]E�ILI�
====
�O°l �
A1 'Z
5,-,"`"'C' 1.j
�E -FiN,�A, AC
10 A EW SIr-POSO^
"~^="~~"I°
��°��~
°��°"=°'`
',01 ,,���.
~.~-^@R=~
. 0 C -C—.
'OSE" ~°o,'CK
Q.IQ,O99S
111C.101A^-IO—IS
°`=°="^z."°ICK
PAUL S HAnLQ."
° SCOTT =^OMAN
BURTON "KA°"
~" ="w=
MIKE PEKKA�
MONICA M, OAKLEY
ANO H ^NGE N
EwsIwssnn
April 15, 1992
Honorable President and
Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect
lVO S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Subject: Report on Bids `
High Service Pump Modifications at
Stations Nos. 16 and lJ
Gentlemen:
In accordance with your instructions, we have tabulated the
Proposals for construction of High Service Pump Modifications at
Stations Nos. 15 and 17' and present our findings herewith'
1. General
Proposals were invited for the construction of high service pump
modifications at Pumping Stations Nos. 16 and 17 of the Mount Prospect
Water System.
Proposals were received, opened and read aloud at 10z00 A M
Central Daylight Time, on April 14, 1992, in accordance with a No^'1`,
to Bidders mailed on March 31' 1992. ~�
2. Proposals Received
Four proposals were received' All Bidders submitted the required
bid security in an amount not less than ten percent of the amount of the
FOUNDED .",e'4
Honorable President and -2Board of Trustees
-
April 15, 1992
The four proposals have been tabulated in Table l. The names of
the bidders, the amount of bid security accompanying each bid and the
total computed price are listed in Table I and summarized as follows:
Total
Amount
Bidder �of Bid�
Engineer's Cost Opinion %70,000
Tri -Con Corporation 65,860
A. J. Lowe & Son, Inc. 74,413
Advance Mechanical Contractors, Inc. 74,600
M. J. Corbny Company 82,100
3. Irregularities
Irregularities in Proposals submitted by the bidders are as
a. The N. J. Corboy Company did not submit statement of con-
struction experience, equipment and financial condition, as
required in Instructions to Bidders, Paragraph I-2.4.
b. Two bidders did not submit Bid Bond on the form included in
the Contract Documents, as required in Instructions to
Bidders, Paragraph 1-2.6, as follows:
(>) M. J. Corboy Company
(2) Tri -Con Corporation
The apparent low bidder Tri -Con Corporation submitted an acceptable
bid bond using an alternate form of document.
4. Qualifications of Bidders
Nehave reviewed qualifications ofthe apparent low bidder, Tri -Con
Corporation. Tri -Con Corporation has submitted the required qualifica-
tions and appears qualified to perform the work.
GREELEY ANO HANSEN
Honorable President and -3- April lS, 1992
Board of Trustees
5. Discussion
To complete the bid review process, the following procedure is
^ Village review the financial statement of the low bidder,
Tri -Con Corporation, to determine if it meets Village
standards for a contract of this size.
_ Village Attorney review the proposal of the low bidder,
Tri -[on Corporation, to verify that it is a legal and binding
proposal, complying with the requirements of the Village,
Based on our technical review of the Tri -Con Corporation bid
proposal, we recommend that the Village award the contract for High
Service Pump Modifications at Stations Npa, 16 and 17 to the low bidder, '
Tri -Con Corporation in the amount of $65,860.
Yours very truly,
Terrence J. Hodnik
TJH:tb
cc: Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
*
GREELEY ANO HAomS91mx
TABLE l
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
High Service Pump Modifications
at Stations Nos' 16 and 17
Bid Tabulation
Greeley and Hansen
April 14, 1992
* In an amount not less than 10 percent of the amount of the bid.
GREELEY ANO HANSEN
Bid Prices
Bidder
Contract Item No.
Required
Bid
1 2
Total
Security*
Tri -Con Corp.
16170 Richmond Avenue
$32,830
$33,030
$65,860
Yes
Crest, IL 60429
-Hazel
633 Rogers Street
37,664
36,749
74,413
Yes
Grove, IL 60515
-Downers
Advance Mechanical
Contractors, Inc.
1500 Durand Avenue
37,250
37,350
74,600
Yes
Racine, WI 53403
1600 DePrizio Drive
38,900
43,200
82,100
Yes
Melrose Park, IL 60160
1
1
1
* In an amount not less than 10 percent of the amount of the bid.
GREELEY ANO HANSEN
urnXIM, W13,43
R1
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 16, 1992
SUBJ: Bid Results - Commuter Parking Lot Rehabilitation
Sealed bids for the rehabilitation of the east and center commut-
er parking lots were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on April
14, 1992. Two bids were received and the apparent low bidder is
Martam Construction at $46,057. Attached is our consulting
engineer, Strand Associates, Inc.'s review of the bids. It is
their recommendation and I concur, to award the contract to
Martam Construction in the amount not to exceed $46,057.
The work that is being proposed is replacement of the deteriorat-
ed asphalt curb with new concrete curbs and pavement restora-
tion. This is identical in design to what was done to the west
commuter lot.
Funding for this proposed expenditure will be split between two
fiscal years. on Page 160 of the 1991/92 budget, Account #
46-073-03-8728 there is $34,800 allocated. On Page 173 of the
1992/93 budget, Account # 46-073-03-8728 there is $10,000 allo-
cated. This results in a shortage of $1,257, for which I re-
quest Village Board authorization to increase the allocated
dollars accordingly.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
CC: Deputy Director of Public Works
Street Superintendent
COMMPARK/FILES/BIDS
RPR 15 '9E 06:S3 STRHMp NSSOCIATES 7.C'ILIET 1L
ttf,.L7�!!i
ASSOCIATES. INC.
e N G" N E E R G
910 Wast Winpra Driva
Madison, Wisconsin 53715
(608) 251.4843
April 15, 1992
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-2229
Attention: Mr, Herbert Weeks
Re: Commuter Lots
Dear Herb:
Bids for the above referenced project were opened by the Village Manager at
10:00 a.m. on April 14, 1991. Two bids were received and opened and the bid
tabulation is included with this letter.
Having only reviewed pages 64-B8 of the bid package and the bid bonds, Strand
Associates notes the following. Martam Construction Inc. from Glen Ellyn was
the apparent low bidder. Their bid included a bid bond for "five percent of
the amount bid'. Two deviations were noted in the bid. The specifications
state "Discrepancies in the multiplication of units of work and unit prices
will be resolved in favor of unit prices. Discrepancies between the indicated
sum of any column of figures and the correct sum thereof will be resolved in
favor of the correct sum."
A. The engineer's computed extension for Pay Item No. 5, PCC Sidewalk,
4 -IN, calculates to $575.00, not $115.00.
B. The engineers computed total bid should then equal $46,057.00, not
$45,597.00.
We recommend that these deviations be reviewed with the Village Attorney
prior to award.
We understand that Martam Construction has previously done work with the
Village and my discussion with Village personnel indicates they were satisfied
with Martam's performance. Discussions with Owners and Engineers who have
previously worked with Martam indicate satisfaction with their performance.
Strand Associates, Inc. has also worked with Martam and found the quality of
their work satisfactory.
IIIA,Kn OFtice; • 407 Weet,*1Iemm 8tr"1, 9u4U G • JORK 10MCU 80{95 • (815) 727.4340
APR 15 '92 08:54 STRAND ASSOCIATES JOLIET IL P.3 6
Village of Mount Prospect
April 15, 1992
Page 2
Martam Construction maintains a permanent place of business at 810 North
Avenue in Glen Ellyn. Martam Construction has a banking relationship with
Parkway Bank (708) 867-6600. Mr Mike Reisman handles the Martam account. I
have not yet been able to reach Mr. Reisman.
Unless the Village Attorney has reservations about the bid deviations noted
above, or Mr. Reisman expresses reservations about Martam's financial capacity
to complete this project, Strand Associates recommends that Contract I-92 be
awarded to Martam Construction, Inc. for the amount of $ 46,057.00 . If you
have any questions concerning our review, please contact me.
Sincerely,
STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC.
Darcie W. DeYoung
378-750/DWD:de
w/encl.
STMAND
wsaaaAT&O. we
APR 15 192 08:54 STRAND ASSOCIATES JOLIET IL P. 4/6
Bids Received: April
14, 1992
STRAND ASSOCIATES, INC.
10:00
a.m.
Consulting
Engineers
407 West Jefferson Ave.
Suite G
Joliet, IL
60435
VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
CONTRACT 1.92
COMMUTER
PARKING LOTS
. . . ...........
5% erW
:bidder kod,,. Address
44a" tie -
� t t
Martam Construction
810 North Avenue
YES
S 45,597.00
Glen Ellyn, IL 60137
$ 46,057.00
Alliance Contractors,
Inc.
1166 Lake Avenue
YES
$ 75,255.00
Woodstock, IL 60098
1AZ,—e
Reviewed by:
* Engineer's Computed Total
APR 15 'SZ Oe: 55 STP.HhD ASSOCIATES JOLIET IL
Bids Received: April 14, 1992
10:00 a.m.
P.5%b
Strand Associates, Inc.
Consulting Engineers
407 W. Jefferson Ave.
Suite G
Joliet, IL 60435
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
CONTRACT 1-92
COMMUTER PARKING LOTS
UNIT PRICES
Bidder and Address
Martam Construction
Alliance Contractors,
810 North Avenue
Inc.
Glen Ellyn, IL
1166 Lake Avenue
60137
Woodstock, IL
60098
ITEM
UNIT OF
UNIT PRICE
EXTENSION
UNIT PRICE
EXTENSION
4
MEASURE &
DESCRIPTION
1
I LS,
Unclassi-
fied
$ 6,015.00
S 6.015.00
$ 19,600.00
$ 19,600.00
Excavation
2
SY,
Asphaltic
Concrete
$ 18.00
$ 12,420.00
$ 26.00
$ 17,940.00
Pavement
3
SY,
Asphaltic
$ 27.00
$ 9,855.00
$ 32.00
$ 11,680.00
Concrete
Sidewalk
4
LF, PCC
Curb and
$ 15.00
$ 465.00
$ 14.00
$ 434.00
Gutter
6 -inch,
8-6.12
S
SY, PCC
Sidewalk,
$ 25.00
$ 115.00
S 30.00
$ 690.00
4 -inch
$ 575.00
6
LS,
$ 2,500.00
$ 2,500.00
$ 5,850.00
$ 5,850.00
Restoration
APR 15 '92 06:55 STRAND ASSOCIATES JOLIET IL
7
1
ManEhoA,
le
$ 250.00
$ 250.00
$ 200.00
$ 200.00
F
AdJustment
I EA, Catch
Basin
$ 180.00
S 180.00
S 465.00
$ 465.00
Casting
9
LF, PPC
Curb,
$ 9.00
$ 13,797.00
$ 12.00
$ 18,396.00
6-INIB-6
TOTALS
$ 45,597.00
$ 75,255-00
$ 46, 057.00
* Engineer's Computed Total
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
IN W.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Service
DATE: April 2, 1992
SUBJECT: 1990 Resurfacing Program - Allied Asphalt Co.
Per your request for more information on the request for additional payment
to Allied Asphalt Co. for the 1990 Resurfacing project, I have found the following:
1.) The original contract was approved 5-7-90 for $262,174.35.
2.) Additional Work Required During Contract - not covered by contract
items.
a.) Temporary patching on Waverly Avenue for 4th of July Parade,
$3,003.40.
b.) Bituminous Base Patching on Huntington Commons Road,
$13,970.40.
3.) A memo was sent to Public Works on November 30, 1990 requesting
this extra work be approved and recommended to the Village Board for
approval on Tuesday, December 18, 1990. There is no record of this
recommendation going to the Village Board or of an additional purchase
order being signed.
4.) When Allied Asphalt Paving Co. submitted their final invoice it was for
a total of $269,846.48 minus 5% retainage of $13,492.32 for a subtotal that
we paid of $252,873.08.
5.) Since the $252,873.08 was still less than the original contract
($262,174.35), nobody ever caught the fact that the requested approval for
extra's had not been processed. Also Allied Asphalt never requested the 5%
retainage and apparently we never realized the Village was holding the
retainage.
6.) Allied Asphalt's auditor has now notified them of the outstanding
retainage and they have requested payment. Final cost including the two
extra work costs was $269,846.48 which is $7,672.13 over the original contract.
Page 2
April 2, 1992
7.) The extra work was performed and inspected by Village inspectors.
MOT was informed of the extra work by letter dated February 13, 1991.
Therefore, I recommend the Village Board approve an increase of $7,672.13
over the original contract and upon the approval we pay Allied Asphalt Paving the 5%
retainage we have been holding amounting to $13,492.32.
buck
CB/m
xc: Herb Weeks, Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Herbert L Weeks, Director of Public Works
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Project Engineer
DATE: March 13, 1992
SUBJECT: 1990 Resurfacing Program - Allied Asphalt Paving Co.
FINAL INVOICE
Attached is the final invoice from Allied Asphalt Paving Co., for the 1990
Resurfacing Program. The original contract with Allied Asphalt was $262,174.35, which
corresponds to the Purchase Order No. 34209, dated May 7, 1990. This purchase order
has since been closed. Before Purchase Order No. 34209 was closed Allied Asphalt was
paid $256,453.16. The final contract amount for the 1990 Resurfacing Program came to
$269,846.48. Therefore, Allied Asphalt Paving Co., is still owed $13,492.32 (see attached
new purchase order.)
Summa
Original Contract Amount
$262,174.35
Final Contract Amount
$269,846.48
Amount Paid to Date
$256,354.16
Amount Still Owed
$ 13,492.32
The additional cost of this project reflects the extra work required to patch Hunt
Club Drive from Huntington Commons to Golf Road. The extra patching was required due
to the unforeseen and random base failures that appeared while the Village was paving
Hunt Club Drive.
I recommend that the,,Yj1,l4ge oars' a
L�rtlm q2 FZFNi-ffiis additional purchase order at the
,130ard-ke"etm, 'o`n� --"d'a',
Fred Tennyson
I concur with the above recommendation.
I�Jf ulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
Illinois Transportation
Division of Highways/District l
2Ol W. Center Court
Schaumburg, IL 60196-1086
Attention: Nr. Val Gaseor
Field Engineer
Local Roads and Streets
Reference: 1990,Geneal Maintenance Resurfacing Program- 90 -00000 -02 -GM '
Dear Sir'
Due to unforeseen circumstances, one of the village streets scheduled for
resurfacing during the lQQO Paving Program required base repair work. This work
was completed by Allied Asphalt Paving Co., on a unit price agreement. (see
attached).
The undersigned determined that the circumstances which necessitated this
additional work were not reasonably foreseeable at the time the contract was
signed. The undersigned also determined that this extra base work was in the
best interest of the Village of Mount Pruspect-
VerytmTyyours,
VILLACE OF MOUNT PhOSPECT
n
Fred Tennyson,JP.E
Project Engineer
Attachment
�
MAYOR
GERALD L. FAnLE,
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
LEO FLOROS
THEODORE J.A+TENEEnG
Village of Mount
Prospe-ct
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTONDIXON
VILLAGE cLcnx
100 S. Emerson Mount R,ospect./o/no/s 60056
CAROL ^FIELDS
Rhone: 70B/39e'6000
February 13,
1991
Fa,: 7oe/39e60e2
Illinois Transportation
Division of Highways/District l
2Ol W. Center Court
Schaumburg, IL 60196-1086
Attention: Nr. Val Gaseor
Field Engineer
Local Roads and Streets
Reference: 1990,Geneal Maintenance Resurfacing Program- 90 -00000 -02 -GM '
Dear Sir'
Due to unforeseen circumstances, one of the village streets scheduled for
resurfacing during the lQQO Paving Program required base repair work. This work
was completed by Allied Asphalt Paving Co., on a unit price agreement. (see
attached).
The undersigned determined that the circumstances which necessitated this
additional work were not reasonably foreseeable at the time the contract was
signed. The undersigned also determined that this extra base work was in the
best interest of the Village of Mount Pruspect-
VerytmTyyours,
VILLACE OF MOUNT PhOSPECT
n
Fred Tennyson,JP.E
Project Engineer
Attachment
)TlR\ allied asphalt paving company
Village Of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr. Bob Pszanka
Dear Mr. Pszanka:
K4ANNHE1AAAND ~FUS0k HKI.carr ILLINOES 80162 • (3121543-4V47
August 7, 1990
Re: General Mairt. Resurf. Proai
Sec.#90-00000-02-GM
As requested we submit the following unit price for the
additional work on the above mentioned project:
Pavt Rem & Bit Repl 6" 162 SY $22.00 $3,564.00
We trust the above will meet with your approval. '
Very truly yours,
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
V,
David T. Verdico
Estimator
allied asphalt paving company! kt4NNHFJM-0—RMMHK.LSIM-ILLINC>ISGOMQ-rJM544-49a7
June 25, 1990
EQUIPMENT EXPE6E'
A
42 Ton Bit Surface Crse @ $20.50 Ton
861.00
Total
Hours Rate Amount
-.Pickut) -
7
7 6 1 42.70
.--L-
1 Truck 75
7
I :'lis 1596 Or, $861.00
129.15
TIOTAL IMMERIAL ...................
I ...................................... ..... 1$990.15
12-4n 86.80
Vibratiory Roller
7
7 129.80 208.60
Trailer 10 Ton
7
7
Tenuta Semi #11_0
Tenuta Semi #2
14
13 1�
4 46.00 184.00
46.00 if;i-nn
5% of $46.00
!7
7 2,30 1-6.1
EL
L I
I
TOTAL EQUIP= .....................................
1� 717.05
M-TERIAL USED
A
42 Ton Bit Surface Crse @ $20.50 Ton
861.00
I SU-SM-1AL. �AURIAL
Arl f)n
I :'lis 1596 Or, $861.00
129.15
TIOTAL IMMERIAL ...................
I ...................................... ..... 1$990.15
allied asphalt paving company MANNHEIM AND K4AMSM HRIMMUINOM WAS2•(M2)-K44-4947
AFFIDAVIT
This is to certify that the material entered on this force account
bill which was taken from stock is shown at our cost.
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
BY;--
Subscribed
Y;Subscribed and sworn to before me this _______jay of
.................... 19
My COMMissiol, Expires
(seal)
Approved
Total Labor
Total Equipment Expense,,,
Total Materials....... „ _.
Bond
TOTAL
TOTAL BILL......
Resident Engineer
Approved
Notary public
717.05
990.15
2,981-04
--2,2.36
—13,003.40
District Engineer
allied asphalt paving company MANNHOM AND HARRGON. HUSIDEn.UNOIS Cale2, ,112,6"-4947
July 9, 1990
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 W. Central Road Re: Village of mt. Prospect
Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Allied Job #0712
Attn; Fred Tennison
Route Various SectjIAKI 10
n 90 -00000 -02 -GM County Cook
Auth. No.
Force accoupt bill for Patching Along C & G On Waverly For Safety
Total �rs� Rate
Payroll
June 25, 1990 q
AmOUlt Amount
der, Foreman
Raker
Raker
Subtotals, Labor
4.5
4.5 2.5
4.5 2.5
4.5 2.5
1.. 3_..., i__-5
18.80
84.60
17.80
124.60
17.80
124.60
17.80
124.60
40
84.60
146.85
146,85
146.85
179.03
4.18
aborers Pension & Welfare Funds 33 Urs. @ 2.90 97.15
perating Engineer Pension 4' .,'el are 11rs @
Subtotals, Labor ................................................... 801.33
Plus 35% of B.01, �3 280.47
Subtotals, LaFor ........................... 1081.80
Plus: WorWens Compensation Ins., 4.$49% of 5'94 80
Pub. Liab. and Property Damage . ...... 22 06
Insurance, excluding Payroll of
True: Drivers 5.00% 6f 704.18
Federal thiemployment Tax U% I)f 704.18 35 _.21
Slate Unemployment Tax 7.50% of _704.18 5.63
Federal Social Security Tax 1.65% Of 704.18 �52-81
Total Payroll Additives 53.87
Plus 10% of 174.-58 174.58
TOTAL LAWR ..... ................... [! !17�". 4 . �6 192.04
... ... ....................... 1273. 84
I hereby certify that the above statement -is a copy of that portion o 10ay - roAl which applies
to the above stated work I and that the rates shorn: for taxes and ':sur ce a ual costs.
Signed
e
allied asphalt paving cotilpany :;! .,,,,..,,,n„,.,....,,, .„,.,,,,..
Date:, gyt lll.:t i(J tr9.io
Village Of Mt. Prospect
100 S. 13nerson -
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Re: General Matnt. Resurf. Program
Attn: Mr. Bob Pszanka Section #90 -00000 -02 -GW
OCT 8 ,nor
Esti=te Payment No. /
ltoin of Work
Quantity
Unit
BID
ng2.,oa+
Bit Cone Surf Crse MixD CLI T 2PN
_.9598
„.._,_
26
00 ..)Ja'gi.
0
Level Binder (MN) MixB Tye_
TN
22
00
2y)200
Bit Mater Prima Coat SS -1
9995-
_
d�
_
,999
50
Bit Mater (Prince Coat MC -30)
0
C[,_
IQ
Pre ardtion of Base
0 lsy
I
1
8it Surf Ram 2"
1513fi
5
.,
_
15136
00
T
___,_2, 310
75_
iii t Surf Ran f Var. De 9081
Area Re Crk Cont Treat �vs A 17363 „gam
_I
56
9'734
98
Pound CrIc Seal 12205
.11271
75
Dry Grout Solis 1
CE„„
Z1.QQ__3
780,
00
Holes Drilled
j!7 �F'
5
E__
w,gp
1„2'330
825
0,0,
00
Fr 6 Cr to bo od u2te.d
to b"diidsted
92
F
1
6
930
00
,Str„ ,[,Ares
Structures to be reconstructed
9
4
050
00
Traffic Control & Protection
IS
3801
00
3 800
00
(Non MIT)�_
100% _
Q,q,_,
..
Maintenance Bond 29-Mont)
635
22
0
13 970
00
+y, 1V4'tW ........... neo
t� ! ��° q c� . 8 505 Leis 5X Itetninage 13 492 32
P o .ti'�11~ Less /LnC. previously paid.,... -0-
rw. '1 w.
m
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Herbert L. Weeks, Director of Public Works
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Project Engineer
DATE: March 13, 1992
SUBJECT: 1990 Resurfacing Program - Allied Asphalt Paving Co.
FINAL INVOICE
Attached is the final invoice from Allied Asphalt Paving Co., for the 1990
Resurfacing Program. The origirial contract with Allied Asphalt was $262,174.35, which,
corresponds to the Purchase Order No. 34209, dated May 7, 1990. This purchase order
has since been closed. Before Purchase Order No. 34209 was closed Allied Asphalt was
paid $256,453.16. The final contract amount for the 1990 Resurfacing Program came to
$269,846.48. Therefore, Allied Asphalt Paving Co., is still owed $13,492.32 (see attached
new purchase order.)
Summary
Original Contract Amount $262,174.35
Final Contract Amount $269,846.48
Amount Paid to Date $256,354.16
Amount Still Owed $ 13,492.32
The additional cost of this project reflects the extra work required to patch Hunt
Club Drive from Huntington Commons to Golf Road: The extra patching was required due
to the unforeseen and random base failures that appeared while the Village was paving
Hunt Club, Drive.
I recommend that the Village Board approve this additional purchase order at the
Board Meeting on Tuesday, April 7, 1992
Fred Tennyson
I concur with the above recommendation.
1x ulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W, MY USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 17, 1992
SUBJ: Emergency Repair of 24" Combined Sewer
202 W. Owen
On Thursday, April 16, 1992, Village crews discovered a large
cave-in in the parkway in front of 202 S. Owen. This hole was
approximately 61 in diameter and 6' - 8' deep and was right next
to a large 3011 elm tree. Village crews flooded the hole with
sewer tracing dye which then appeared in the downstream manhole
of a 24" combined sewer. We then attempted to run our sewer
flusher through the 2411 sewer and were unable to get through.
Based on this it was determined that the sewer must have col-
lapsed somewhere below the large cave-in.
The depth of this 24" sewer is 151 to the top of the pipe which
is far beyond the reach or capacity of any of the Village's
equipment. Therefore due to this emergency condition and limita-
tions of Village equipment, I contracted with Rossetti Bros. to
make these emergency repairs. Rossetti completed an emergency
repair for us this past February on West Sunset and it was co-
incidental they were in town repairing a house sewer service on
North Maple. After finishing that repair they were able to move
their crew and equipment right over to the 202 S. Owen location.
As of 9:00 a.m. Friday, April 17, Rossetti has exposed the 2411
pipe where there was a 21 section of concrete pipe pieced in
amongst the normal clay tile pipe. This was the point of fail-
ure and thus far they have had to remove 15' of 24" pipe that
has collapsed. At this time we are unsure as to how much more
pipe will need to be replaced. Rossetti's current estimate is
$15,000.00, however, this may have to be adjusted depending on
how much more pipe will have to be replaced.
I therefore request that the Village Board waive the normal
bidding requirement and award an emergency contract to Rossetti
Bros. in the amount of $15,000. 1 further request authorization
be given to the Village Manager to adjust this figure according-
ly, based on the final amount of pipe that requires replacing.
Under a separate existing tree removal contract we had Nels
Johnson remove the 30" elm tree at an approximate cost of
$1000. This item is, however, covered under our existing Vil-
lage Board approved contract and requires no action.
once all repairs are complete I will follow up with a final
report to the Board.
Aerbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
CC: Deputy Director of Public Works
Water/Sewer Superintendent
OWEN202/FILES/SEWERS