HomeMy WebLinkAbout4432_001Next ordinance No. 4411 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Resolution No. 9-92
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D B R 0 F B U 8 1 N R S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, 18t Floor
Senior citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
11. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
April 7, 1992
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald "Skiple Parley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Lao Ploros
Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
111. INVOCATION - Trustee Cloves
IV. A. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, March 17, 1992
B. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, March 24, 1992
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, March 28, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CIT12ENS TO BE HEARD
A. PROCLAMATION: GLOBAL RELIEF DAY, APRIL 24, 1992
B. Selection of Global Relief contest winner
C. PROCLAMATION: Girl Scout Leader's Day, April 22, 1992
D. PRESENTATION: Illinois Association for Flood
Plain and Stormwater Management Award acknowledging
Mount Prospect as 1 of the 8 municipalities
participating in the National Flood Insurance Program
E. Request from Mount Prospect Jaycees to waive
all fees charged in conjunction with conducting
their annual carnival, which will be held at
the Mount Prospect Plaza May 20 - 25, 1992.
F. Request from Mount Prospect Lions Club to waive
all fees charged in conjunction with conducting
their annual Village Fair, which will be held
at Melas Park July 1 - 5, 1992.
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
This Ordinance expands the definition of
Alcoholic Liquor to include beverages advertised
as non-alcoholic.
ALL
(Exhibit A)
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 8-V-92, 2005 East Euclid Avenue
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2005 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
This ordinance grants a variation to allow an
accessory storage shed 216 square feet in size,
rather than the permitted 120 square feet, with a
height of 11.5 feet, rather than the permitted
101. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B)
B. ' ZBA 9-Z-92, 2320 West Lincoln
1. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT AS IT PERTAINS TO PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 2320 WEST LINCOLN STREET
This ordinance rezones the subject property
from R -X to R-1, Single Family Residence
District, in order to permit a 3 lot
subdivision for single family homes. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING
MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
FOR THE LINCOLN -HICKORY SUBDIVISION
This ordinance grants for modifications from
Development Code to waive the requirement
to install storm sewers until a future date;
to permit a Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing
installation of street lights until such time
as the Village determines; and to provide a
10 year period during which the residents of
these homes would not be assessed for street
improvements. (Exhibit D)
C. ZBA 10-V-92, 507 Go Wando
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 507 GO WANDO
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow
a 141 411 rear yard setback, rather than the
required 251. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0. (Exhibit E)
D. ZBA 11-V-92 and ZBA 12 -SU -92, 401 Ojibwa Trail
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
AND SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
401 OJIBWA TRAIL
This Ordinance grants variations to allow
* 281 211 front yard, rather than the required 401;
* 34% lot coverage, rather than the permitted
maximum of 25%, in order to construct an
addition to the existing home located on a
corner lot; to allow a circular driveway with
a 341 wide driveway, rather than the 211 width
permitted; and, a Special Use to allow a garage
designed to house more than two vehicles. The
Zoning Board recommends granting these requests
by votes of 6-0. (Exhibit F)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 14-V-92, 2320 West White Oak
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
reduce the required 40 foot front yard setback
for this R -X property to 28.3 feet in order to
construction a room addition. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 7-0.
B. ZBA 15-V-92, 201 N. Deneen Lane
At the request of the Petitioner, this case has
been withdrawn.
C. ZBA 16-V-92, 906 See Gwun
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
increase the maximum driveway width from 15'
to 20' for a one -car garage. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 7-0.
D. ZBA 13-A-92, Text Amendment
The Petitioner, Village of Mount Prospect, is
requesting a text amendment relative to non-
conforming uses. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-1.
E.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO BORROW FUNDS FROM
THE WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND
(Exhibit G)
F.
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING A COUNTYWIDE FLOOD AND
STORMWATER MITIGATION EFFORT
(Exhibit H)
G.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE
REFERENDUM QUESTION ON THE BALLOT OF THE
PRIMARY ELECTION HELD MARCH 17, 1992
(Exhibit J)
H.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I
OF CHAPTER 9 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amends Section 9.115 of Chapter 9
to clarify the area necessary for pedestrian
traffic in conjunction with sidewalk cafes.
(Exhibit K)
I.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I
ENTITLED "DISORDERLY CONDUCT" OF CHAPTER 23
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance establishes the prohibition of
drinking alcoholic beverages on public,
commercial and multi -family property.
(Exhibit L)
J.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVIII
OF CHAPTER 23 ENTITLED "LANDLORD AND TENANT
REGULATIONS" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance establishes regulations prohibiting
drinking in the parking lots and common areas
of multi -family developments.
(Exhibit M)
K.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE X
OF CHAPTER 4 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance specifies the Village Manager as
Director of the Emergency Service Disaster Agency
(ESDA) pursuant to new regulations.
(Exhibit N)
L.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V
ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance increases the water and sewer
rates.
(Exhibit 0)
M.
Request from NTN Bearing to reconsider action
taken at the last regular meeting of the
Village Board to deny the field change for
two free standing signs.
N. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ARTICLE XXXIV OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE
This ordinance establishes an additional
inspection fee for food establishments
requiring more than the normal 4 inspections
per year. (Exhibit P)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. Parkway restoration
2. Turf mowing
3. Fire Hose and nozzles
4. Road reconstruction
5. Compact Station Wagon for the Public Works
Department
6. Street resurfacing
7. Curb and gutter repairs
B. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL
BUDGET FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1992 TO
APRIL 30, 1993 IN LIEU OF PASSAGE OF AN
APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE. (Exhibit Q)
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
A. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT TRANSFERRING JURISDICTION OF THAT
PORTION OF CAMP MC DONALD ROAD, 'LOCATED
WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, TO THE CITY OF
PROSPECT HEIGHTS
This Agreement transfers the maintenance
responsibilities of Camp Mc Donald Road,
lying within Mount Prospect, to the City
of Prospect Heights. (Exhibit R)
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - The purpose of this Executive
Session is to discuss Personnel and determine if
any of the minutes of previous Executive sessions may
be released from confidentiality.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MARCH 17, 1992
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 8:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran - arrived late
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION
$ 637,233
The invocation was given by Trustee Busse.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
26,122
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert,
APPROVE
moved to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting
MINUTES
of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held
Parking System Revenue Fund
March 3, 1992.
Risk Management Fund
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Vehicle Replacement Fund
Hoefert, Wilks
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
Nays: None
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.,
Motion carried.
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Fire & Police Building Const.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Hoefert,
APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
General Fund
$ 637,233
Refusal Disposal Fund
7,641
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
26,122
Community Development Block Grant Fund 9,291
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
72,169
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
451,753
Parking System Revenue Fund
4,741
Risk Management Fund
77,316
Vehicle Replacement Fund
-
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.,
21,160
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
1,630
Fire & Police Building Const.
208,834
Flood Control Revenue Fund
83,807
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
-
Flexcomp Trust Fund
10,966
Escrow Deposit Fund
24,054
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
-
Benefit Trust Fund
2,167
$1,638,884
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse,
moved to FINANCIAL
accept the financial report dated February
29, 1992 REPORT
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes,
Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
COMPLAINT:
A resident of Prospect Heights who recently purchased
REAL ESTATE
a townhouse in Mount Prospect, complained about having
TRANSFER TAX
to pay a 3% real estate transfer tax and asked the
purpose of the tax.'
Trustee Corcoran arrived at this point.
MAYOR'S REPORT
PRESENTATION:
Mayor Farley presented David Jepson, Finance Director,
with the Certificate of Financial Excellence awarded
by the Government Finance Officers Association.
OLD BUSINESS
AMEND ORD. 4281
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
215 E. PROSPECT
amend Ordinance No. 4281, pertaining to property
AVENUE
located at 215 East Prospect Avenue, by..extending the
effective date for one additional year.
It was noted that the! Petitioner will have all the
necessary documents and drawings in order to apply for
building permits for the proposed addition to this
commercial establishment within 6 months.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4407
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4407.
AN ORDINANCEEXTENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4281
PERTAINING TO PROPERTY LOCATED AT 215 EAST
PROSPECT AVENUE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert', Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SWANCC
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would approve and authorize the execution of a Project
Use Agreement with SWANCC (Solid Waste Agency of
Northern Cook County).
Several residents and interested parties expressed
their opposition to the Village's commitment to
membership in SWANCC.
ORD.NO. 4408
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4408
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A PROJECT USE AGREEMENT (SWANCC)
Upon roll.call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: Clowes
Motion carried.
Page 2 - March 17, 1992
An ordinance was presented for second reading that
would create a municipal Waste System (SWANCC).
Several residents and interested parties expressed
opposition to the proposed Ordinance and transfer
site in unincorporated Wheeling Township.
Trustee Wilks suggested an Advisory Committee be
established to oversee the operations of the transfer
site to guarantee the quality of well water in that
area and to monitor the property values in that area.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4409
AN ORDINANCE CREATING A MUNICIPAL WASTE
SYSTEM (SWANCC)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: Clowes
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 8-V-92, 2005 East Euclid Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
an accessory storage shed 216 square feet in size,
rather than the permitted 120 square feet, which
shed will have a height of 11.5 feet, rather than
the permitted 10 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendations of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the variations in ZBA 8-V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading
on April 7th.
ZBA 9-Z-92, 2320 West Lincoln Street
The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from R -X,
granted upon annexation, to R-1 (Single Family
Residence District) in order to permit a 3 lot
single family home subdivision. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-0.
It was noted that there is an existing home on the
subject property, which will be demolished therefore
permitting the creation of 3 lots, all meeting
Village regulations, when 3 single family homes
will be constructed.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the request in ZBA 9-Z-92.
Upon roll call:
Motion carried.
Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Page 3 - March 17, 1992
SWANCC
ORD.NO.4409
ZBA 8-V-92
2005 EUCLID
ZBA 9-Z-92
2320 LINCOLN
An Ordinance will be presented April 7th for first
reading.
MODIFICATIONS In conjunction with the creation of the '3 lot
FROM DEVELOPMENT subdivision being created (as noted above) at 2320
CODE; West Lincoln Street, the Petitioner submitted the
2320 W.LINCOLN following requests:
To waive the requirement to install storm sewers
at the time the development is completed;
To permit a cash deposit to guarantee installation
of street improvements at a future date;
To defer installation of sidewalks and
To permit a Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing
installation of street lights at a date to be
determined by the Village.
The Plan Commission recommended 6-0 to grant the
requests, with the exception of deferring installation
of sidewalks. The Plan Commission recommended
sidewalks be installed at the time of construction.
The Plan Commission also recommended a covenant for
street light installation.
There was discussion as to the effect of this
development on drainage and whether the streets should
be installed at this time. Staff stated that they
would encourage installation of public improvements in
conjunction with .;the development of this 3 lot
subdivision.
Residents expressed their concern that their property
may receive additional storm water, since the grade of
the subject property is lower that the surrounding
property.
The Village Engineer stated that development would
eliminate the existing 'puddling' on the property and
that neighbors would not be experience additional
Water.
The Petitioner stated that this particular area does
not have fully improved streets and while he is willing
to install the streets, the pavement would end at the
edge of the subdivision and the rest of the street
would not be improved. The Petitioner expressed
concern that if he'is required to install the street,
the residents of the proposed homes would probably have
to pay for additional street improvements in the
future, as he believed any street improvements done now
would have to be removed or modified when the entire
roadway is improved. A request was then presented to
guarantee the residents would not be assessed for the
roadway reconstruction on that portion of Helena Avenue
for a period of 10 years.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to waive the requirement to install storm sewers; to
require the installation of sidewalks and all street
improvements; to guarantee that the residents of these
homes will not be .assessed for reconstruction of that
portion of Helena ''Avenue for a period of 10 years
following
Page 4 - March 17, 1992
acceptance by the Village; and, to permit a
Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing installation
of street lights at a future date.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented April 7th for first
reading.
ZBA 10-V-92, 507 Go Wando
ZBA 10-V-92
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
507 Go Wando
a 141 411 rear yard setback, rather than the required
25 feet in order to permit an addition to the home.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested
in ZBA 10-V-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
at the April 7th meeting of the Village Board.
ZBA 11-V-92 and 12-SU-92, 401 Ojibwa Trail
ZBA 11-V-92 &
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
ZBA 12-SU-92
a 281 211 front yard, rather than the required
401 OJIBWA TR
40 feet; to allow a 34% lot coverage, rather than
the permitted 25%, in order to construct an
addition; to allow a circular driveway with
a 341 width, rather the permitted 21 foot width;
and, a Special Use to allow a garage designed to
house more than two vehicles. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting these requests by
a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the requests in
ZBA 11-V-92 and ZBA 12-SU-92.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented April 7th for first
reading.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
SELL
would authorize the sale of 5 SCBA's and 10 spare
PERSONAL
tanks no longer useful or necessary to the Village.
AIR TANKS
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 5 - March 17, 1992
ORD.NO. 4110
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4110.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PERSONAL
PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MFT FUNDS
A Resolution was presented that would authorize the
appropriation of Motor Fuel Tax Funds in the amount of
$920,000 to be used for general maintenance projects
in 1992.
RES.NO. 8-92
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 8-92.
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL
TAX FUNDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
APPEAL
The Appeal from the Village Manager Jahn Fulton
EVOCATION OF
Dixon's decision to revoke the business license issued
BUSINESS LICENSE
to the Sports Health Spa, 1657 South Busse Road, due
to alleged misconduct, was continued to the Committee
of the Whole Meeting on March 24th.
NTN BEARING:
A request was presented to ratify the action of the
LOCATION OF
Village Manager and grant a field change to permit two
SIGNS
free standing signs;, 7' 8" in height, to be located
on the subject property, 1600 Bishop Court.
The Village Manager explaced tha this request is now
being processed as a field change becuase the matter
of signs does not alter the concept of the original
Planned Unit Development. the Village Manager stated
that an amending Ordinance is not necessary for this
type of change in a'PUD.
The Village Boarddiscussed the matter and questioned
if the matter was best handled as a field change or an
amendment and if the Zoning Board of Appeals should
have made the initial recommendation rather than the
Sign Review Board.
The Board gnerallydiscussed the matter of signs on
berms and the circumstances of this matter.
Peter Lannon and Ron Cassidy, members of the Zoning
Board of Appeals, expressed confusion over the method,
Ordinance or field change, to allow these signs. They
also stated that since this is a PUD that possibly the
request should have been an amendment to the PUD which
would require a Public Hearing before the Zoning Board
of Appeals.
Page 6 - March 17, 1992
Richard Hendricks, 1537 East Emmerson, expressed
his Opposition to allowing the signs on the berm.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded Trustee Floros, moved
• ratify the action Of the Village Manager and
grant a field change to allow NTN Bearing,
1660 Bishop Court, two free-standing signs on
the :subject
..-
Upon roll call: Ayes: Floros, Hoefert
Nays: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Wilks
Motion failed.
Trustee Wilks suggested the Village pay the expense
of removing the existing signs as well as the
cost of relocation.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
pay for the removal and relocation of the NTN
Bearing signs.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Wilks
Nays: Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert,
Farley
Motion failed.
David Freidman, attorney for NTN Bearing, stated that
his client feels they are within their rights to have
the signs and that they do not intend to remove the signs.
A request was presented to waive the bidding procedure WAIVE
and authorize the purchase of two 1992 Chevrolet Blazer BIDS:
4 -door 4 x 4 utility vehicles at a cost of $34,200 as PURCHASE
well as the cost to detail and convert the vehicles for 2 CHEVROLET
use by the Community Service Officers at a cost of BLAZERS -
$2,800 for a total of $37,000. POLICE DEPT.
It was noted that these vehicles would replace existing
station wagons, each of which has over excess of 60,000
miles, which were scheduled for replacement this year.
Trustees expressed concerns that Blazers could not be
used as full service vehicles and that the existing
vehicles should be to maintained in order to give
additional years of service.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the bidding procedure and authorize the purchase
and conversion of two Chevrolet Blazers for the Police
Department at a cost not to exceed $37,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran,
Wilks
Nays: Floros, Hoefert
Motion carried.
It was announced that the results of the referendum CITIZENS
question as to whether the Village should purchase UTILITIES
the Citizens Utilities Water Company were received. PURCHASE
The results of the Mount Prospect voters are as REFERENDUM
follows: RESULTS
Yes 1,028
No 1,787
Page 7 - March 17, 1992
Since this question was defeated, members of the Board
expressed interest in the possibility of placing the
question on the ballot for the November election.
A Resolution declaring the results of this Referendum
question will be presented April 7th.
For general information, Village Manager Dixon informed
the Village Board that a spring clean up will take
place May 4 - 8 at which time residents may place
unlimited amounts of garbage for pick up by the
Village's scavenger service.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Mayor Farley stated that due to the late hour, the
Board would not go into Executive Session in order to
review and determine if minutes of previous Executive
Session can be released.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley adjourned this meeting to March 23, 1992
at 7:00 P.M. at which time the Board will consider the
appeal from the Village Manager's decision to revoke
the Sports Health Spa business license.
The meeting was adjourned at 12:15 AM.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 8 - March 17, 1992
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MARCH 24, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:20 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Farley called the roll.
Present upon roll call
Absent:
Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floras
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Trustee Mark Busse
CONSIDERATION OF APPEAL
The Board was informed that the legal counsel for the
owner of the Sports Health Spa, 1657 South Busse Road,
was not present and would not be able to be present
at all this evening for this Special Meeting.
The Board then discussed the setting of the time for a
Special Meeting. The Board continued this Special Meeting
to Saturday, March 28, 10:30 a.m., at the Senior Citizens'
Center, 50 South Emerson Street.
CALL TO ORDER
APPEAL
SPORTS HEALTH
SPA
The Mayor requested that the owner and attorney for the owner
be notified by Registered Mail that the meeting will be held
at that time and that a decision will be made.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 7:22 p.m.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
John Fulton Dixon
Village Manager
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MARCH 28, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
CALL TO ORDER
This meeting was continued from the March 17 regular Board
meeting and the March 24 Special Meeting. Mayor Farley
called the meeting to order at 10:33 a.m. to consider
the appeal by the business owner of the Sports Health Spa,
at 1657 South Busse Road of the decision of the Village
Manager to revoke the Business License.
ROLL CALL
Mayor Farley called the roll.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Mark Busse
In addition, attorney Everette Hill for the Village,
attorney Ben Goldwater for the owner, Village Manager
Dixon and two print media representatives were in
attendance.
CONSIDERATION OF "PEAL
APPEAL
After opening the Special meeting, Mayor Farley stated
SPORTS HEALTH
that the purpose of the meeting was to hear the appeal
SPA
of the revocation of the Business License of the Health
Spa. He then gave a history of the events leading up
to the reason for this continued special meeting.
t
The Mayor then requested comments on the revocation by
Mr. Ben Goldwater who was present as the attorney for the
licensee. Mr. Goldwater first showed clothing worn by
personnel that was requested at the last meeting he
attended. He then reviewed the Deposition by Deputy
Sheriff Beinarauskas and argued that it would be improper
to revoke the license for the following reasons:
1. No act of prostitution took place at the
massage parlor.
2. No solicitation for prostitution took place.
3. The owner did not have adequate command of the
English language for the presentation of her
case at the Hearing before the Village Manager.
4. Under any circumstances, the penalty of
revocation was far too harsh for any alleged
wrongdoing that might have occurred.
5. Taking away of the livelihood of the owner would
be unconscionable action since there was no
prostitution act that took place.
6. Mr. Goldwater also requested that the business
owner be given a second chance.
Mr. Hill, the attorney for the Village Manager responded.
He indicated that the issue was not whether prostitution
took place. The issue is in regards to our Code as to why
the Business License should be revoked. He then read the
Statute defining prostitution to the Board and argued that
the facts fit the definition. He next read the section of
the Village Code under which the licensee was revoked and
argued that the Manager was not required to find that the
act of prostitution occurred in order to revoke the license
but merely a that a matter concerning the health, welfare
and safety of the community occurred.
Mr. Hill indicated; that a second chance would not
be appropriate in this matter and also asked that
the Board support the Village Manager's decision.
Mr. Hill indicated that: Mr. Goldwater suggested that
money was not exchanged for the act, therefore, it
should not be classified as a sex act. Mr. Hill
indicated that what took place was definitely a sex
act. Mr. Hill then indicated that the Village
Manager only needs to be satisfied that there was
a menace to health, welfare and safety of the
community and the Manager indicated he felt this was
not the kind of activity that should be given a
second chance.
He further indicated that in the testimony of the
owner, she was not a neophyte to this kind of
activity and it was clear and shown in her testimony
that she was a badmanagerand actually allowed the•
person who committed this act to continue working
for her after the Hearing.
Attorney Goldwater';' replied as follows:
Mr. Goldwater then indicated the touching of the
investigative officer's genital was probably
accidental according to the evidence. The evidence
further showed that the owner had run a clean and
healthful business and had not given the Village any
previous problems. He further argued that the facts
did not fit the Statutory definition since there was
no additional money paid for a sexual activity. He
concluded by stating that the Cook County State's
Attorney had dismissed the criminal case because
the evidence did not show any unlawful activity.
The owner also indicated in testimony that there was
no admission whether the act took place or not. In
good conscience, the Village Board should not adhere
to the Village Manager's decision.
Attorney Hill then replied that the evidence from
the transcripts indicated there was far more than
an accidental touching of genitals and that Mr.
Goldwater's argument misstated the facts on that
issue. In fact, the transcripts indicated that the
masseuse actually;, returned a second time to
manipulate the penis of the officer. This was
clearly not an accidental touching.
A Motion was made to uphold the decision of the
Village Manager by Trustee Hoefert, with a second
by Trustee Corcoran'. The Mayor then asked if there
were any questions from Board members.
Trustee Clowes indicated he would normally give a
business a second 'chance but in this case the owner
has indicated that she felt she had been caught
concerning the sexual. act. In fact, the owner
indicated this is 'something that sometimes happens.
The owner's established management practices were
not good enough.
Trustee Wilks then; indicated that she had contacted
the Director of the YMCA to determine actions that
the YMCA would take if a masseuse were accused of
similar activity. She called them because she was
aware that they are a local business that also has
a masseuse that gives massages. The Director stated
that the person would have been terminated
immediately if there were even a hint of an improper
act. Furthermore, when massages are given at the
YMCA, they are given by people of the same sex and
Page 2 - March 28, 1992
they are not aware of this activity being done at any Y.
Trustee Wilks further stated that taking away of the
livelihood was not of the Village's making but of the owner's
making. Furthermore, she believed the evidence indicated this
type of activity had happened previously at the Sports Health
Spa and that the owner had been aware of it.
Mayor Farley, after finding no further information or
questions, then called for the vote of the Motion to uphold
the Village Manager's decision. The vote was unanimously
approved with 6 ayes including the vote of Mayor Farley.
AWOURIMNT ADJOURN
Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 10:55 a.m.
John Fulton Dixon
Village Manager
Page 3 - March 28, 1992
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH
POSITION
March
26, 1992
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
3/13/92 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
311.2192
3/26/92
list of Bills
Entry 3/26/92
general & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 2,904,320
$ 702,918
$ 485,718
$ 3,121,520
Refuse Disposal Fund
140,729
259,979
183,093
217,615
Motor Fuel Tax
627,665
-
5,649
622,016
Community Development Block Grant Fund
935
29,721
2,923
27,733
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
57,970
117,148
11,676
163,442
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,175,063
366,214
66,639
3,474,638
Parking System Revenue
190,156
7,396
1,721
195,831
Internal Service Funds
t
Risk Management Fund
1,218,295
172,976
71,874
1,319,397
Vehicle Replacement Fund
458,435
-
e
458,435
Capital Pro'ects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,182,949
109,739
5,306
1,287,382
Downtown Redev Const Funds
563,220
-
576
562,644
Police & Fire Building Construction
5,598,128
6,807
5,591,321
Flood Control Construction Fund
4,824,142
-
90,581
4,733,561
Debt Service Funds
1,004,246
103,504
-
1.,107,750
Trust & Apency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
1,116
4,543
e
5,659
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,411,980
15,335
17,453
1,409,862
Police Pension Fund
17,044,803
73,630
49,983
17,068,450
Firemen's Pension Fund
9,039,991
83,375
50,127
19,073,239
Benefit Trust Funds
240 996
240.996
559,685,139
$2,046,478
$1.050.126
$ $60,681,491
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AAH-HA WEIDNER
ABD TANK & PUMP
ALBERGO INC.
ANZALONE, JOSEPH
GIOVANNI ARCARI
BUSY BEE ANTIQUES
V.J. CENTRACCHIO & SON INC.
CITIBANK,N.A.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
CONROY SEWERAGE
DES PLAINES LAWN SPRINKLERS
DIMUCCI CONSTRUCTION CO.
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
DOYLE SIGNS, INC
FREDIANI HOMES INC.
ILLINOIS MECHANICAL
IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL RISK MGMT AG
NORMA M. JARMER
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
KAJIMA INTERNATIONAL
KIEFFER SIGN CO.
EDWARD K. LINDFORS
PEDRO LOPEZ
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C10440 AAH-HA WEIDNERS
$100.00
C10489 AAH-HA WEIDNER
$75.00
C10511 AAH-HA WEIDNER
$100.00
$275.00
C10370 ABD TANK & PUMP
$100.00
$100.00
C10204 ALBERGO INC
$50.00
$50.00
RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE
$520.00
$520.00
REFUND OVERPMT STICKER
$35.00
$35.00
REFUND OVERPMT LICENSE
$5.00
$5.00
C10487 VJ CENTRACCHIO
$100.00
$100.00
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS GAB
$4,350.46
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB
$993.77
$5,344.23*
920319 PMT P/R 3/19
$224.25
$224.25*
C10468 CONROY SEWERAGE
$100.00
$100.00
Al VARIOUS C1689
$50.00
$50.00
C10446 DI MUCCI DEV
$100.00
$100.00
P/R ENDING 3/19/92
$387,394.73
P/R ENDING 3/19/92
$897.26
P/R ENDING 3/19/92
$728.58
P/R ENDING 3/19/92
$34,140.53
P/R ENDING 3/19/92
$1,779.51
$424,940.61*
1487 DOYLE SIGNS
$100.00
1488 DOYLE SIGNS
$100.00
1489 DOYLE SIGNS
$100.00
1490 DOYLE SIGNS
$100.00
$400.00
C4961 FREDIANI
$100.00
$100.00
C10497 ILLINOIS MECHANICAL
$100.00
$100.00
APRIL 92 PAYROLL
$225.00
$225.00
1983 ADDTL ASSESSMENT
$6,159.72
$6,159.72
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$10.00
$10.00
920319 PMT P/R 3/19
$254.00
$254.00*
920317 KAJIMA
$4,150.00
$4,150.00
1425 KIEFFER SIGN
$100.00
1426 KIEFFER SIGN
$100.00
1427 KIEFFER SIGN
$100.00
$300.00
REFUND DUPLICATE TAX STAMP
$474.00
$474.00
010508 PEDRO LOPEZ
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3%26/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
M -K SIGNS, INC.
1436 M -K SIGNS
$100.00
$100.00
M -S SIGNS
1497 M -S SIGNS
$100.00
1499 M -S SIGNS
$100.00
$200.00
EILEEN MCDEVITT
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$5.00
$5.00
MCDONALD CREEK CONDO ASSN.
C10428 MC DONALD CREEK
$100.00
$100.00
MITCH'S GREEN THUMB
C7570 MITCHS GREEN THUMB
$75.00
$75.00
MOOSE RIVER VENDING INC.
REFUND LICENSE OVERPMT
$30.00
$30.00
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 3/12
$6.22
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 3/12
$766.78
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 3/12
$525.62
920319 SAVINGS BONDS
$450.00
DUE TO FED DEP PR 3/19
$1,233.67
DUE TO FED DEP PR 3/I9
$118.70
DUE TO FED DEP PR 3/19
$67.87
DUE TO FED DEP PR 3/I9
$10,908.91
DUE TO FED DEP PR 3/I9
$2,566.72
DUE TO FED DEP PR 3/19
$55.24
$16,699.73*
NORTHWEST HEATING & AIR CONDIT
C10426 NORTHWEST HVAC
$100.00
$100.00
OPUS
C10422 OPUS NORTH
$100.00
$100.00
PARAGON GROUP
1495 PARAGON GROUP
$100.00
1496 PARAGON GROUP
$100.00
$200.00
JAYESH K. PATEL
REFUND STICKER
$20.00
$20.00
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
MAR POLICE PENSION DISB
$49,983.15
MAR FIRE PENSION DISB
$50,127.03
$100,110.18*
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
PETTY CASH
$100.00
$100.00*
PIERCE BUILDERS
C10000 JE PIERCE BLDRS
$100.00
C10000 JE PIERCE BLDRS
$10.00
$110.00
PIHER INTERNATIONAL CORP.
REFUND LICENSE OVERPMT
$40.00
$40.00
ELLEN PLATE
920319 PMT P/R 3/19
$225.00
$225.00*
PUROFIRST OF CHICAGOLAND
C10373 PUROFIRST
$20.00
C10373 PUROFIRST
$100.00
$120.00
R J & G SEWER
C10498 RJ & G SEWER
$100.00
$100.00
RAC CORP.
C10304 RAC CORP
$25.00
$25.00
RAINBOW SIGNS
1447 RAINBOW SIGNS
$50.00
1491 RAINBOW SIGNS
$100.00
$150.00
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
FACILITIES PLAN
$4,187.57
$4,187.57
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26%92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
SERVICE CONSTRUCTION CO.
C9908
SERVICE CONST
$100.00
$100.00
SIGNS TODAY
1469
SIGNS TODAY
$75.00
$75.00
LYNNE STEICHER +
REFUND
STICKER OVERPMT
$30.00
$30.00
STEVE AND SONS
C10457
STEVE & SONS
$135.00
$135.00
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
920319
BOND MONEY
$4,315.00
920323
BOND MONEY
$1,550.00
920324
BOND MONEY
$150.00
920326
BOND MONEY
$600.00
$6,615.00*
TIM TOSCH
C5260
TIM TOSCH
$75.00
$75.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
C10204
ALBERGO INC
$50.00
C10304
RAC CORP
$75.00
C10373
PUROFIRST
$15.00
C10457
STEVE & SONS
$15.00
C10489
AAH-HA WEIDNER
$25.00
1469
SIGNS TODAY
$25.00
Al
VARIOUS C1689
$50.00
C2564
CHO
$100.00
C4182
SPITZ
$100.00
C5260
TOSCH
$25.00
C5847
THE PHOENIX GROUP
$100.00
C6240
DUNFIELD BLDRS
$100.00
C6992
A & W REMODELING
$500.00
C7570
MITCHS GREEN THUMB
$25.00
C9519
LACSON-STEELE
$100.00
C9717
SEARS BLDG
$50.00
REFUND
$30.00
1261
PARKWAY
$100.00
1447
RAINBOW SIGNS
$50.00
$1,535.00
VILLAGE SEWER
C8988
VILLAGE SEWER
$100.00
$100.00
SCOTT WALLACE
C10296
SCOTT WALLACE
$100.00
$100.00
KIMBERLEY WEATHERFORD
REFUND
STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
RANDOLPH L. WITEK
REFUND
STICKER
$5.00
$5.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
r
$575,699.29
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ARNSTEIN & LEHR
FEB92
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
SERVICES
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
APPROVAL REPORT
SERVICES
$166.50
PAYMENT
DATE 3%2692
$123.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$394,076.19
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$1,898.21
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$965.13
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,675.69
WATER & SEWER FUND
$37,232.87
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$783.82
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$11,503.95
POLICE PENSION FUND
$49,983.15
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$50,127.03
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$17,453.25
********************************************************************************************************
SERVICES
$263.06
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$8.00
MISC EXPENSES
$78.93
$86.93
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
***TOTAL**
$86.93
GENERAL FUND
$86.93
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ARNSTEIN & LEHR
FEB92
SERVICES
$13.00
FEB92
SERVICES
$1,797.65
FEB92
SERVICES
$166.50
FEB92
SERVICES
$123.00
FEB92
SERVICES
$471.75
FEB92
SERVICES
$3,950.00
FEB92
SERVICES
$634.70
FEB92
SERVICES
$333.80
FEB92
SERVICES
$139.60
FEB92
SERVICES
$418.50
FEB92
SERVICES
$55.50
FEB92
SERVICES
$864.25
FEB92
SERVICES
$263.06
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
JOHN F. DIXON
THE HERALD ,
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ILLINOIS GFOA
MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC.
ORGANIZATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS,I
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BARRY A. SPRINGER
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
FEB92 SERVICES
EXPENSES
WANT AD PW MTCE
PHYSICAL -HART
PHYSICAL -BECK
10 GFOA LUNCHEON TICKETS
AIRLINE TICKETS-DIXON
SEMINARS
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
FEB92 LEGAL SERVICES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
DUES & MTGS-MORGAN
SERVICES RENDERED
$14,987.43
INVOICE AMOUNT
$1.21
$767.71
$178.92
$198.00
$76.00
$110.00
$556.00
$1,100.00
$48.50
$531.24
$966.45
$10.58
$21.25
$45.50
$44.26
$88.88
$67.75
$54.62
$14.65
$7.50
$45.85
$184.00
$641.25
***TOTAL**
PAGE 5
TOTAL
$9,228.52
$767.71*
$178.92
$274.00
$110.00
$556.00
$1,100.00
$1,824.41
$122.62
$184.00
$641.25
$14,987.43
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
ALLIED FILM & VIDEO 75TH ANNIVERSARY VIDEOS $812.50
75TH ANNIVERSARY VIDEOS $39.95
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$39.30
PAGE 6
CARL HAUSER
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$6.13
$6.13
NCR CORPORATION
PAYMENT DATE 3126/92
$109.20
$109.20
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
MISC EXPENSES
$25.65
$36.25
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
75TH ANNIVERSARY VIDEOS
$58.83
$181.28
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SVC PHONE SYSTEM
$333.30
$333.30
MARISHA JASON
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$433.50
XL/DATACOMP INC.
COMM ASST CITI UTIL MTG
$25.00
$50.00
JOHN KEANE
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$12.90
$12.90
ROSCOR CORPORATION
2 COLOR MONITORS
$1,154.00
HDWRE EDIT CONTROL CABLE
$95.00
$1,249.00
WALTER SOSIN
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
ROBERT TOBA
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,926.48
GENERAL FUND
$1,926.48
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
BLUE COPY PAPER
$39.30
$39.30
CARL HAUSER
EXPENSES
$6.13
$6.13
NCR CORPORATION
CASH REGISTER TAPE
$109.20
$109.20
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$10.60
MISC EXPENSES
$25.65
$36.25
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
FEB92 PROGRAMMING SVCS
$247.50
$247.50
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$126.84
$126.84
RYDIN SIGN AND DECAL
RE TRANSFER TAX STAMPS
$433.50
$433.50
XL/DATACOMP INC.
MARCH MTCE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$1,011.76
r
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26192
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $1,011.76
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
ABM, INC. LABEL SYSTEM $159.00 $159.00
MUNIMETRIX SYSTEMS CORPORATION CLERKS INDEX SYSTEM $950.00
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT $300.00 $1,250.00
ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY $20.20
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
SCHWAAB, INC.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
DELIVERY
DELIVERY
LEGAL NOTICE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL NOTICE
PRE -INKED STAMPS
$1,847.18
$24.95
$16.70 $61.85
$34.28
$71.21
$65.93
$71.21
$73.85
$21.10 $337.58
$38.75 $38.75
***TOTAL** $1,847.18
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD
APRIL ADMIN FEES
$4,314.17
MED CLAIMS THRU 3/18
$44,588.09
$48,902.26*
CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS.
RISK MGMT SVCS
$500.00
$500.00
FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE
APRIL 92 LIFE INSURANCE
$2,125.99
$2,125.99
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
REIMBURSEMENT
$209.50
REIMBURSEMENT
$166.75
$376.25
HMO ILLINOIS
APRIL HEALTH INSURANCE
$8,465.85
$8,465.85
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3126%92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
i
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$60,370.35
INVOICE AMOUNT
***TOTAL**
PAGE 8
TOTAL
$60,370.35
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC.
THE COBB GROUP
ELEK-TEK, INC.
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
MICHAEL FRONTZAK
LES HANNEMAN
IAFSM
MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS INC.
NCPCCI
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
CERTIFICATION REQUEST
$35.00
$35.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$39.00
$39.00
CREDIT
$65.00 -
BASIC VGA CARD
$65.00
BASIC VGA CARD
$59.00
$59.00
PRINTING CHARGES
$51.00
STAFF CO & REFUND REPORTS
$591.00
$642.00
EXPENSES
$218.75
$218.75
EXPENSES
$112.50
$112.50
REGISTER-WULBECKER
$85.00
$85.00*
AIRFARE-WULBECKER
$303.00
$303.00
REGISTER-KRUPA
$75,00
REGISTER-JAKES
$165.00
$240.00*
MISC EXPENSES
$9.80
MISC EXPENSES
$10.61
MISC EXPENSES
$12.00
MISC EXPENSES
$27.43
$59.84
MARCH MTCE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
***TOTAL**
$1,807.13
$1,807.13
r
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MELVYN BOTH
ADVANCE CONF EXPENSES
$380.00
$380.00
COMPUSERVE, INC
COMPUTER SVC INFO
$10.00
$10.00
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
ENVELOPES
$240.55
$240.55
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
CANON WORD PROCESSOR
$895.00
$895.00
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP.
SUPPLIES
$111.21
$111.21
FINGERPRINT EQUIPMENT LABS INC
FINGERPRINT INK
$35.26
$35.26
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
FEB92 CAR WASHES
$437.50
$437.50
H R HART PHOTO
FILM PROCESSING
$80.26
$80.26
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
MICE & COPIES
$95.55
MTCE & COPIES
$108.77
MTCE & COPIES
$133.82
$338.14
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$151.96
$151.96
THOMAS JACOBI
EXPENSES
$18.00
$18.00
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$1,330.00
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$380.90
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$378.40
$2,089.30
KENNETH LEE
ROOM EXPENSES
$258.50
$258.50
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$459.48
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$413.60
$873.08
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
SUPPLIES
$268.95
SUPPLIES
$58.37
SUPPLIES
$56.50
$383.82
METRO -MIAMI S.P.I.A.A. CONF.
REGISTER-DALEY/RICHARDSON
$300.00
$300.00*
MICROIMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC.
MICROFILM READER PRINTER
$3,875.00
$3,875.00
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
TONER
$176.13
$176.13
EDWARD NASTEK
ANNUAL REPORT PHOTO WORK
$68.00
$68.00
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$13.76
MISC EXPENSES
$166.94
MISC EXPENSES
$16.82
$197.52*
ERIC E. PIEE
RADIO REPAIRS
$468.00
RADIO REPAIRS
$240.00
RADIO REPAIRS
$980.00
$1,688.00
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
JAN92 STRAYS
$192.00
FEB92 STRAYS
$603.00
$795.00
QUALEX, INC.
FILM PROCESSING
$13.37
FILM PROCESSING
$10.13
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC,
SAVE -A -PET
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC
STANARD & ASSOCIATES, INC
STIPES PUBLISHING CO.
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TRW CREDIT DATA DIVISION
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
XL/DATACOMP INC.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FILM PROCESSING
FILM PROCESSING
BROCHURES
FEB 92 STRAYS
RULERS
7 PERSONALITY INTERVIEWS
PUBLICATIONS
TUITION-RZEPECKI
TUITION-RIORDAN/RZEPECKI
EMPLOYMENT INSIGHT INFO
RADIO REPAIRS
RADIO REPAIRS
RADIO REPAIRS
JAN/FEB92 LOCKUP/FOOD
MARCH MTCE SERVICE
PAGE 10
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$64.77
$17.82
$106.09
$40.00
$40.00
$385.00
$385.00
$432.77
$432.77
$1,750.00
$1,750.00
$136.60
$136.60
$600.00
TEST & REPAINT
$700.00
$1,300.00
$39.70
$39.70
$39.00
$440.00
$58.50
ICE RESCUE EQUIPMENT
$46.20
$143.70
$161.75
$161.75
$65.20
$65.20
***TOTAL** $17,963.04
$16,743.04 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $1,220.00
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
AIRLINE TICKET -AMBER
$303.00
$303.00
ALKI SOFTWARE CORPORATION
SOFTWARE
$174.85
$174.85
DON ANDERSON
EXPENSES
$17.14
$17.14
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
TEST & REPAINT
$297.55
$297.55
BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
GLOVES
$440.00
$440.00
BOAT4U.S. MARINE CENTER
ICE RESCUE EQUIPMENT
$541.25
$541.25*
EDWARD CAVELLO
EXPENSES
$300.00
$300.00
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
TELEPHONE SERVICE
$246.74
$246.74
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
CREDIT
$30.00-
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
CHICAGO COMM. SERVICE, INC
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
GFE, INC
H R HART PHOTO
MARLENE HAJEK
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOC
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS SECR.ASSN
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
LONNIE JACKSON
KALE UNIFORMS, INC.
KINNEY SHOE CORPORATION
LIQUID AIR CORPORATION
MAC WAREHOUSE
MACWAREHOUSE
MACWORLD
METROPOLITAN FIRE CHIEFS ASSOC
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
MOUNT PROSPECT LAWNMOWER
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$349.95
$319.95
SERVICE
$394.70
SERVICE
$38.60
$433.30
ENVELOPES
$54.98
$54.98
ENVELOPES
$184.00
ENVELOPES
$192.00
$376.00
FEB92 CAR WASHES
$16.00
$16.00
PARTS
$81.40
$81.40
SUPPLIES
$118.32
$118.32
EXPENSES
$224.28
$224.28
MICE & COPIES
$95.50
MICE & COPIES
$108.00
MICE & COPIES
$133.75
$337.25
23 RECOMBIVAX VACCINE
$920.00
$920.00
SERVICE
$104.77
SERVICE
$22.17
SERVICE
$20.26
$147.20
REGISTER CAVELLO/ULREICH
$160.00
$160.00
DUES-HAJEK/HEREDTIA
$50.00
$50.00
PRE -REGISTER -JACKSON
$125.00
$125.00
EXPENSES
$55.00
$55.00
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$134.03
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$23.91
CLOTHING
$288.10
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$412.77
$858.81
EXERCISE EQUIPMENT
$95.98
$95.98
OXYGEN ACETYLENE
$67.40
CYLIND RS
$20.00
$87.40
SUPPLIES
$140.00
SUPPLIES
$95.00
$235.00
SOFTWARE UPDATE
$21.00
$21.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$18.97
$18.97
REGISTER CAVELLO
$50.00
REGISTER-ULREICH/DUMOVICH
$100.00
$150.00
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
$62.0.00
$620.00
1 USED SNOW BLOWER
$175.00
$175.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26192
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS ASSOCIATION
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
ORDER FROM HORDER ,
PHYSIO -CONTROL
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
QUALEX, INC.
SIANA BAKERY
SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS, IN
SUBURBAN GAS SALES
SULLIVAN PRESS
U.S. CAVALRY
V & G PRINTERS INC.
DONALD WISNIEWSKI
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
DUES-ULREICH
SUPPLIES
CREDIT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
MTCE AGREEMENT
PARTS
CREDIT
PARTS
FRAMES
SUPPLIES
BAKERY GOOD -CLASS
SUPPLIES
6 CARIBINERS
OXYGEN CYLS
LETTERHEAD & ENVELOPES
1 PAIR 911 BOOTS
FIRE DEPT AWARDS
EXPENSES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$65.00
$21.75
$9.98-
$131.71
$30.91
$9.98
$870.00
$497.72
$340.64-
$311.54
$53.19
$14.67
$24.84
$505.50
$84.00
$93.00
$102.50
$79.95
$75.00
$50.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 12
TOTAL
$65.00
$21.75
$162.62
$870.00
$468.62
$67.86
$24.84
$589.50
$93.00
$102.50
$79.95
$75.00
$50.00
$10,672.01
$9,,991.51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $680.50
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICES
APRIL SERVICES RENDERED
$27,410.00 $27,410.00
***TOTAL** $27,410.00
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CHICAGO MESSENGER SERVICE INC.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
V & G PRINTERS INC.
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
MESSENGER SERVICE
CDBG TITLE INSURANCE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
MISC EXPENSES
HEALTH CARE SERVICE
BUSINESS CARDS-FORSYTHE
PRINTS
$26.70
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$296.00
PAGE 13
$168.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$92.40
$60.06
PAYMENT DATE 326/92
$8.20
$8.20
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$27,410.00
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$415.30
SENIOR TAXI
$834 .15
$1,249.45
ARA/CORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
COFFEE SUPPLIESES
$46.00
COFFEE SUPPLIES
$92.00
$138.00
COMMUNITY CAB CO.
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$318.20
$318.20
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
COPY MACHINE TONER
$270.00
$270.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$40.39
$40.39
THE PERFECT IMAGE
SCREENED PRINTS
$24.00
SCREENED PRINTS
$10.00
$34.00
V & G PRINTERS INC.
BUSINESS CARDS-SKURLA
$62.00
$62.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$2,112.04
GENERAL FUND
$2,112.04
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
CHICAGO MESSENGER SERVICE INC.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
V & G PRINTERS INC.
VITAL RECORD BANC, INC.
MESSENGER SERVICE
CDBG TITLE INSURANCE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
MISC EXPENSES
HEALTH CARE SERVICE
BUSINESS CARDS-FORSYTHE
PRINTS
$26.70
$26.70
$296.00
$296.00
$168.00
$92.40
$60.06
$320.46
$8.20
$8.20
$1,333.33
$1,333.33
$39.00
$39.00
$54.00
$54.00
PLANNING DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $2,077.69
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
PAGE 14
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $119.70 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,957.99
STREET DIVISION
A-1 AIR COMPRESSOR CORP.
ABM, INC.
AERIAL EQUIPMENT, INC.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
MELVYN BOTH
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BROCK TOOL COMPANY
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
BUSHNELL, INCORPORATED
CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HODS
CHICAGO CASTER AND EQUIPMENT C
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONRAD AND SON
PRESSURE SWITCH
$22.40
$22.40
CARTIDGES
$62.50
REPL CARTRIDGE
$32.00
$94.50
SUPPLIES
$61.70
$61.70
PARTS
$19.08
PARTS
$83.38
CREDIT
$27.30 -
PARTS
$109.37
$184.53
REPAIRS
$516.50
SERVICE
$3,900.00
$4,416.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$598.32
$598.32
SUPPLIES
$136.50
$136.50
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$249.50
$249.50
SERVICE CALL
$82.50
$82.50
ADVANCE CONF EXPENSES
$105.00
$105.00
SUPPLIES
$8.68
SUPPLIES
$7.86
SUPPLIES
$282.27
SUPPLIES
$330.23
$629.04
SUPPLIES
$17.00
$17.00
SUPPLIES
$297.71
$297.71
REPAIR DAMAGED TRAVELER
$87.00
$87.00
MISC PIPE FITTINGS
$176.42
$176.42
SUPPLIES
$23.74
$23.74
HEAVY DUTY CASTER
$20.50
$20.50
SUPPLIES
$248.60
SUPPLIES
$36.00
SUPPLIES
$895.80
$1,180.40
BF80-JT-17006
$1971.42
$197.42
CHAIR
$74.75
$74.75
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
COURTESY HOME CENTER
SUPPLIES
$38.98
$38.98
THOMAS CRAMER
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
$190.00
$190.00
DES PLAINES GLASS COMPANY
MIRROR
$434.00
$434.00
FIRE AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC
FD PANEL QTRLY CHG
$99.00
$99.00
FIRE CONTROL, INC.
SVCE SPRINKLER HEADS
$218.36
$218.36
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC
PAINT
$419.70
$419.70
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
FEB92 CAR WASHES
$17.00
$17.00
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
$306.24
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
$39.00
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
$41.00
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
$39.00
$119.00
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MICE
$1,232.00
$1,232.00
HEIL-CHICAGO INC
2 FILTERS
$30.34
$30.34
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
SUPPLIES
$22.17
$22.17
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
-SUPPLIES
$80.75
$80.75
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT
A FRAME
$1,300.00
$1,300.00
ILLINOIS RECYCLING ASSOCIATION
MEMBERSHIP & SUBSCRIPTION
$75.00
$75.00
RALPH KOTTKE & SONS
TREE TRANSPLANT
$110.00
$110.00
LAIRD PLASTICS
SUPPLIES
$109.25
$109.25
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
3 ROXTER LAMPS
$78.22
$78.22
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
PARTS
$345.00
PARTS
$390.00
$735.00
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SEV
QIARTERLY ALARM SVC CHG
$25.00
$25.00
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
CHECKED BOILER
$145.00
$145.00
MIKE PETROW
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
$98.00
$98.00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$33.91
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$77.28
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$36.23
$147.42*
JOHN PRINCE
S C SIDEWALK PROGRAM
$175.00
$175.00
PROSAFETY
S PPLIES
$122.80
$122.80
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
PARTS
$10.94
$10.94
SHERWIN-WILLIAMS
SUPPLIES
$44.00
$44.00
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$70.39
$70.39
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
SUPPLIES
$1$.14
SUPPLIES
$24.31
$42.45
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
CREDIT
$145.00 -
$465.34
PAINT SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
$169.51
$489.85
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
CAMERA & MODULATOR
$424.08
$268.04
$424.08
$268.04
UNI -LABEL & TAG
MAILING LABELS PRINTED
$34.00
$34.00
VALIQUET INC.
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
BLADES SHARPENED
WARNING STICKERS
$798.00
$798.00
WEARGUARD
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
$42.01
$519.44
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
$171.04
$732.49
HOWARD L. WHITE & ASSOCIATES,
1 TABLE TOP/5 SEAT TOPS
$510.00
$510.00
WIPECO INC
RAGS
RAGS
$50.00
$299.00
$349.00
WOOD DALE TRANSMISSION EXC.INC
REPAIRS
$423.00
$423.00
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$19,179.90
GENERAL FUND
$12,231.40 MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND
$5,648.50
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$1,300.00
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
ABS CLINIC
$89.57
$120.00
$209.57
AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$249.50
$550.00
$249.50
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
DEC91 MTCE INSPECTION
$550.00
$1,100.00
BADGER METER INC
JAN92 MTCE
SPOOLS
$677.82
$153.00
$677.82
$153.00
MELVYN BOTH
ADVANCE CONF EXPENSES
$282.27
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
SUPPLIES
3+1.42
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
30.24
$$
$643.93
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3126/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BJ80-JT-23598
$4,986.55
$4,986.55
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH67-JT-1310-A
$51.06
$51.06
COMPUTERLAND ,
KING MEMORY
$195.00
$195.00
CUES, INC.
CAMERA ACCESSORIES
$147.47
CAMERA ACCESSORIES
$35.39
$182.86
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
DELIVERY
$65.00
$65.00
THE FILE MART
LEGAL FOLDERS
$158.00
$158.00
FORBES INCORPORATED
ELECTRICAL WORK
$118.75
$118.75
JOSEPH D. FOREMAN & CO.
METER ADAPTERS
$662.14
$662.14
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
FEB92 CAR WASHES
$4.00
$4.00
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
$306.24
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
SUPPLIES
$101.26
$101.26
GREELEY AND HANSEN
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$733.74
$733.74
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
$725.60
WATER METER LABOR
$713.70
WATER METER LABOR
$761.28
WATER METER LABOR
$285.48
WATER METER LABOR
$237.90
WATER METER LABOR
$499.59
WATER METER LABOR
$428.22
$3,651.77
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MTCE AGREEMENT
$12.59
MTCE AGREEMENT
$18.89
$31.48
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$77.00
SERVICE
$17.81
SERVICE
$16.99
SERVICE
$25.54
SERVICE
$18.61
SERVICE
$46.50
SERVICE
$17.83
$220.28
ILLINOIS LIFT TRUCK CORP.
PARTS
$377.32
$377.32
JULIE, INC.
FEB92 CHARGES
$78.57
FEB92 CHARGES
$9.70
$88.27
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L
MOTIVATION VIDEO RENTAL
$83.00
$83.00
NET MIDWEST, INC.
FEB92 WATER SAMPLES
$135.00
$135.00
MIKE NEURURER
CDL REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3126/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND
$96.82
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
$202.27
$299.09
ORACLE CORPORATION
ORACLE SERVER
$2,959.20
$2,959.20
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$58.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$34.50
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$63.43
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$36.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$9.31
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$8.46
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$25.95
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.67
$237.32*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$221.94
$221.94
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$576.43
$576.43*
PROSAFETY
SUPPLIES
$122.80
$122.80
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$253.08
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$86.40
CREDIT
$86.40-
$253.08
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
PARTS
$50.32
PARTS
$9.92
PARTS
$31.28
PARTS
$55.27
PARTS
$23.15
PARTS
$23.15
PARTS
$42.35
$235.44
QUALITY DISCOUNT AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$10.62
PARTS
$17.10
PARTS
$17.67
$45.39
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
FILM PROCESSING
$10.19
FILM & PROCESSING
$31.20
FILM & PROCESSING
$70.06
FILM & PROCESSING
$169.60
$281.05
ROSETTI BROTHERS CONSTR.CO.INC
REPAIR SANITARY SEWER
$6,020.47
$6,020.47
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SERVICE PARTS WASHER
$336.50
$336.50
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY ,INC.
SUPPLIES
$12.91
$12.91
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
OXYGEN CYLINDER
$12860
WELDING SUPPLIES
$41.38
$53.98
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WEARGUARD
WIPECO INC
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER & SEWER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
$42.01
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
$519.44
REPLACEMENT UNIFORMS
$171.04
$732.49
RAGS
$300.00
RAGS
$300.00
$600.00
SUPPLIES
$1,220.96
$1,220.96
$29,406.59
***TOTAL** $29,406.59
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A $21.18
STRAND ASSOCIATES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
BH66-JT-3710-A
BH66-JT-5262-A
BH66-JT-5266-C
BH68-JT-7498-A
ENGINEERING SERVICES
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
$936.74
$12.71
$138.93
$127.02
$21.18 $321.02
$600.00 $600.00
$15.72 $15.72
***TOTAL** $936.74
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
r
ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY FEBRUARY COLLECTIONS $105,524.15
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $181,194.97
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$230.00
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$230.00
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
$200.00
$660.00
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
DEADBOLT
$12.49
$12.49
THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P.
FEBRUARY COLLECTIONS
$45,305.11
$2,600.00
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SER
FEBRUARY COLLECTIONS
$24,875.67
$175,704.93*
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF,NORTHERN
FINANCE MEMBERS EQUITY CHG
$5,490.04
$5,490.04
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SERVICES RENDERED
***TOTAL**
$181,194.97
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $181,194.97
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC.
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$230.00
.FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$230.00
FIELD OFFICE TRAILER
$200.00
$660.00
CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HOUS
SUPPLIES
$211.39
$211.39
COURTESY HOME CENTER
DEADBOLT
$12.49
$12.49
THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P.
APRIL RENT
$2,600.00
$2,600.00
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SER
BURGLAR ALARM
$700.00
$700.00
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$90,580.66
$90,580.66
BARRY A. SPRINGER.
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,181.25
SERVICES RENDERED
$573.75
$1,755.00
TROW MIRZA
SERVICES RENDERED
$3,447.20
$3,447.20
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
JANlFEB92 LOCKUP/FOOD
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
17 S WILLE ST
$2.62
$2.62
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$100,069.36
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$2,105.13 POLICE & FIRE
BOND PROCEEDS
$6,807.20
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$576.37 FLOOD CONTROL
CONST FUND 1991
$90,580.66
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
BUDGET SIGN COMPANY
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/26/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
CHANGEABLE COPY LETTERS
BG21-JT-1838-A
BH67-JT-3858-B
2 NYLON US FLAGS
HISTORY BOOKS
$1,366.77
PAGE 21
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$340.00
$340.00
$52.45
$29.32
$81.77
$695.00
$695.00
$250.00
$250.00
***TOTAL** $1,366.77
$1,050,125.66
DATE RUN 3/26/92
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22
TIME RUN 10.42.53
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 3/26/92
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$485,717.56
21
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$183,093.18
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$5,648.50
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$2,923.12
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,675.69
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$66,639.46
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,720.56
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$71,874.30
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$5,305.63
53
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$6,807.20
56
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$576.37
58
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
$90,580.66
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$49,983.15
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$50,127.03
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$17,453.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,050,125.66
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, trees, shrubs, and flowers are a great part of the
scenic beauty of our Village and of our Nation, in addition to
providing for good sail and healthy plant life which is essen-
tial to the general economy and agriculture of our Nation; and
WHEREAS, trees, shrubs and plant -life in general are among
God's gifts to many and should be preserved and appreciated;
and
WHEREAS, trees can help offset the greenhouse effect by turn-
ing carbon dioxide, the primary cause of global warming, into
life-giving oxygen, and
WHEREAS, the planting of trees in Mount Prospect will also
help conserve energy use by shading and cooling buildings and
pavement.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim Friday, April 24, 1992, as
ARBOR DAY in the Village of Mount Prospect and urge educators
to teach our youth the benefits derived from plant life and
encourage the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect to
continue to plant and maintain such plant life throughout the
Village.
FURTHER, I do hereby proclaim that the Village. of Mount Pros-
pect shall continue to participate in the Global ReLeaf ef-
fort, to which it dedicates all public tree plantings for the
year 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated: April 7, 1992
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
GIRL SCOUT LEADER'S DAY
APRIL 22, 1992
WHEREAS, Girl Scouts across the nation observe the eleventh
annual Girl Scout Leader's Day on April 22, 1992; and
WHEREAS, Girl Scouting leaders have served as valuable role
models for more than 50 million girls since Girl Scouting
began in 1912; and
WHEREAS, Girl Scout leaders provide an all -girl setting where
girls can enjoy leadership experiences that will enhance their
lives so that they can contribute to society now and in the
future; and
WHEREAS, Girl Scout leaders provide a setting where girls can
have fun and form lifelong friendships; and
WHEREAS, 4,464 adults in Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council
volunteer as Girl Scout leaders working with 14,337 girls in
over 50 northwest Cook County, Skokie Valley and northern Lake
County communities;
NOW, THEREFORE I, Gerald L. Farley, by virtue of the authority
vested in me as mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, hereby
proclaim April 22, 1992, as GIRL SCOUT LEADER'S DAY in Mount
Prospect.
I do further call upon all citizens of the Village of Mount
Prospect to join me in honoring Girl Scout leaders and lending
continued support and cooperation to all Girl Scouts.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
%064*6
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 7th day of April, 1992.
,... Mt. Prospect Jaycees
P. 0. BOX 27 • MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056
March 25, 1992
Mr. Ron Pavlock
Chief of Police
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mr. Pavlock:
I am writing to following up on our request for police officers for
our Twentieth Annual Memorial Day Weekend Carnival. We have been
informed by John Dixon that our previous request dated November 25,
1991 for two officers, one paid by the village and one paid by the Jaycees,
has been included in the 1992-93 budget. I am now writing to you to
determine what process needs to be followed next. The dates and hours
we are requesting services are as follows:
Wednesday, May 20, 1992
Thursday, May 21, 1992
Friday, May 22, 1992
Saturday, May 23, 1992
Sunday, May 24, 1992
Monday, May 25, 1992
- 6:00 p.m. - 11:30 p.m.
- 6:00 p.m. - 11:30 p.m.
- 6:00 p.m. - 12:30 a.m.
- 1:00 p.m. - 12:30 a.m.
- 1:00 p.m. - 11:30 p.m.
- 1:00 p.m. - 10:30 p.m.
Please let me know what, if anything, we need to do to insure we
receive the coverage requested. I can be reached 'during the daytime at
253-1116. 1 also want to thank you for all your help in putting together
this request. I look forward to hearing from you.
Sincerely, /
U 61ou
Linda Malik
Secretary/Treasurer
cc: John Dixon
March 26, 1992
LIONS CLUB
P. O. BOX 332
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Ms. Carol Fields
Village Clerk of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Carol,
The Mount Prospect Lions Club is requesting to hold its 54th Annual Lions
Village Fair on July 1,2,3,4,5, 1992 at Melas Park Central Road near Busse
Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
This event will consist of a Carnival w/rides and concessions, Fireworks
show on the 4th of July at dusk, Food Tent consisting of 10 to 15 food
vendors, nightly entertainment on the main stage, Piggy Races, Camel Rides,
Petting Zoo, Raffle and Bingo nightly, plus other daily activities.
All mechanical rides, tents, electrical services, food vendors will be set-up
and in-place late on Tuesday June 30, 1992 for inspections by village
representatives. Each Village department will be contacted directly by the
chairman of the event with exact times for inspections.
We are looking forward to celebrating the Village of Mount Prospect 75th
Anniversary with the biggest and best fair for the residents of Mount
Prospect.
We are requesting that Mr. Tim Murphy and Mr. James Carver be placed on
the agenda for April 7th, 1992 Village Board Meeting to ask for the waiver of
fee's for permits and Village services.
If you have any questions or concerns please feel free to contact me at any
time at work or home.
Sincerely
0
Brian K. Ipsen
1992 Fair Committee Chairman
BH/caf
4/2/92
[0) S 63 0 z K% Z [4@ Do z
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS'
SECTION ONE: That Section 13.101 entitled "Definitions" of Chapter
13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby
further amended by amending the definition of "Alcoholic Liquor"
in its entirety; so that hereinafter the definition of Alcoholic
Beverage shall be and read as follows:
ALCOHOLIC LIQUOR: 1. Any spirits, wine, beer, ale or other
liquid containing more than one-half of
one percent (.5%) of alcohol by volume,
which is fit for beverage purposes.
2. For the purposes of this Chapter,
Alcoholic Liquor shall also include any
beverages commonly known as "near beer",
"non-alcoholic beer", or "non-alcoholic
wine" whose taste, color, odor and
consistency are similar to the alcoholic
beverages known as beer, wine and, except
for the reduced alcohol content, is
marketed as being similar to beer or
wine."
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
0
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER M\L
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 2, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-92, STEVE MUDRAK
LOCATION: 2005 EUCLID AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Steve Mudrak of 2005 Euclid Avenue, The variation
was filed to allow an accessory storage shed of 216 square feet rather than 120 square feet
as permitted by Code, with an 11.5 foot height rather than 10 feet.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Steve Mudrak presented information that the shed would be constructed
to replace an older structure which is not large enough for the petitioner's needs. He
explained that he has a large garden, and that storage is necessary for lawn and garden
equipment.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning, explained that this is a large lot and the shed would
be located at a 10 foot side yard setback, exceeding the minimum 5 foot setback, and that
the house on the adjoining lot is not near the shed location. He noted that a larger shed
was not inappropriate on this 30,000 square foot lot.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed. They questioned whether the structure
would have overhead doors. The petitioner stated that there would be no such doors. It
was noted that there were no adjoining property owners present to object to the request.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a variation to allow an accessory storage shed of 216 square feet with a
height of 11.5 feet with a limitation that no overhead door be installed.
DMC:hg
JOHN M. HENRIKSEN
OF
Ij,OT 7.MM (20) IN ALTEN'S EUMID AVESUWSICr4 OF THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 133.5 = OF THE NUI?j� QUARTER (1/ 4) OF SEC'
Tv.NSHIP 42 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, LYING WEFT OF A LEE DRAWN AT RIGHT ANGLES M nm Sam
NORTHEAST QVAKIIER (1 /4) AT A Pollir 347.56 WEST OF THE CE!TfER LINE OF RIVER ROAD; ALSO THAT PART OF THE NOFaN RALF (112) OF
NORTHEAST QUAnER (1/4) or THE SOLTijwFsT tXAPI."ER (1/4) OF SAID SECTION 25, LYING NORTH OF THE NORM LrNE OF THE SIM 18-1/2 1
ALSO THAT PART OF THE SOURMAST QUARTER (11/4) OF SAID SBMON 25, LYING NUVIN OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 18-1/2 RODS OF nU
RODS OF SAID SOUMEASr QUARTER (1/4) (ED(OYMNIG 7,[EREFRCM THAT PART MUMF M7MOFCRE DEDICATED FOR RaZZS, IN COOK =Zny, r1l
E. EUCLID AVENUE
W + E
kk
ORDER MUMSER 921021
DATE ' JANUARY 13, 1992
SCALE IINCH = 30 FEET
ORDERED BY STEVE MUDRAK
*BUILDING LfNES,Ir ANI,SHOWN HEREON ARE BUILDING
LINES SHOWN ON THE RECORDED SUBDIVISION PLAT.
CONSULT LOCAL AUTHORITIES FOR BUILDING LINES
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF COOK
I \1
1,JOHN MICHAEL HENRTKSEN.AP 11
Land Surveyor, do hereby cent 1 fy to
the above described property and '
drawn Is a correct repreSentatIC' 0
Dimensions are shown it fe,: a
are correct at & temperature c i8'
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 8-V-92 Hearing Date: February 27, 1992
PETITIONER: Steve Mudrak
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
2005 East Euclid
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 11, 1992
REQUEST:
Variation from the provisions of Section
14.102.B.3. and 4. to allow a storage shed of 216
square feet rather than 120 square feet; and a
height of 11.5 ft. rather than 10 ft.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced the request and stated that this application was filed to allow
a variation to permit a 216 square foot storage shed rather than 120 square feet, and a
height variation to allow an 11.5 feet height.
Mr. Steve Mudrak introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained that
he needed the larger storage shed for garden supplies and lawn maintenance equipment.
He explained that he is an avid gardener and has several large garden plots in his rear yard
and that the building is necessary so he can properly house all of the garden supplies
necessary for his garden plots.
Mr. Clements then summarized the request for the Zoning Board of Appeals explaining that
the property is a large 30,00 square foot lot and that a larger accessory building on such
a large lot is not inappropriate. He noted that the shed is located at a 10 foot sideyard
setback which exceeds the minimum 5 foot requirement. He also explained that the house
on the adjoining lot is not near the shed location. Mr. Clements stated that considering the
lot size and setback from the property line, the shed would have no impact on the adjoining
property.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then generally discussed the request and Mr. Lannon asked
if there would be an overhead door in the proposed shed. Mr. Don Burgeson, stated that
he is Mr. Mudrak's son-in-law and that this shed would have swing -open doors.
ZBA-8-V-92
February 27, 1992
Page 2 of 2
There being no further discussion by the Zoning Board, Chairman Basnik asked for a
motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that the request be approved by the Zoning
Board of Appeals, subject to a condition that there be no overhead door. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Cassidy, Pratt, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
David M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
O
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
f
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-8-V-92
APPLICANT:
STEVE MUDRAK
ADDRESS:
2005 EUCLID AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
o�
a a a a a w
O O O O
o p
N
O
O
O
O p
O e!
f
T
0 0N It
0 O
p
O
N
f
O
at
150
o�
cT
of 0
0
0 O O O
O
O
O
O
O
N N N N
N
N
N
N
N
1 0 0
r'
20
2014
�"b
O� Ol 01
3 �
fT1
Of
01
-
N
N
Or
(j i
1'
X070 `+
1016
a
w
o
a�
0
rn
o p N f
rn rn o, rn
o C ~1
2013
1014
a
N N$
2011
1012
E K*WA �,�
931
.1010
?� rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
rn
92
0 0
0
929
1008
N,
o o�
922
925
N N
924
N
927
1006
925
1004
923 922
y
923
1
f
Py
1916 918
921 920
921
1 00 I
N9"� 916
919 g1@,
t
2
�� 2 X14
y g1'1909
9%6
912 'f
g-'0 1915
1924 912
n 9
,A
"7 9 .
�Cr
o L
a I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1, Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 100' x 305' = 30,500 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 13%
F.A.R.: . N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variation of Section 14.102.B. 3 & 4 to allow an accessory
storage shed of 216 square feet rather than 120 ft. as permitted by Code, with a 11.5' height
rather than 10 ft.
wIUV I WIN 6Wi
Summary of application: The applicant would like to replace an existing 8' x 12' storage
shed with a larger 12' x 18' shed. The proposed shed would have a height of 11.5'. The
larger shed is necessary to store lawn maintenance and garden equipment at the petitioner's
home.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The subject property is a large 30,000 square foot lot.
A larger accessory building on such a lot is not inappropriate. The shed is located at a 10
ft. side yard setback, exceeding the minimum 5 ft. setback. The house on the adjoining lot
is not near the shed location. Considering the lot size and the setback from the property
line, the shed will have no impact on the adjoining property.
OTHER DEPARTMENTAL COM
No objections or concerns were raised by other Village Departments. A grading and
drainage plan will be required.
SLIMMARYIRECOMMEND&TION
Staff would recommend approval of the request, considering the large lots in this area and
the petitioner's need for storage of yard equipment.
DMC:hg
CAF/
3/30/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2005 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
WHEREAS, Steve Mudrak (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
2005 East Euclid Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 20 (20) in Alten's Euclid Avenue Subdivision of that
part of the South 133.5 feet of the Northeast Quarter
(1/4) of Section 25, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of
the Third Principal Meridian, lying West of a line drawn
at right angles to the South line of said Northeast
Quarter (1/4) at a point 347.56 feet west of the center
line of River Road; also that part of the North Half (1/2)
of the Northeast Quarter (1/4) of the Southwest Quarter
(1/4) of said Section 25, lying North of the North line
of the South 18-1/2 rods thereof; also that part of the
Southeast Quarter (1/4) of said Section 25, lying North
of the North line of the South 18-1/2 rods of the North
40 rods of said Southeast Quarter (1/4), (excepting
therefrom that part thereof heretofore dedicated for
roads) in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Section 14.102.B.3 and
Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a storage shed of 215 square feet,
rather than the permitted 120 square feet and allow the height of
the proposed shed to be 11.5 feet, rather than the permitted 10
feet; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 8-V-92, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
February, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 11th of February, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 8-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION, ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102.B.3 to permit a storage shed 216 square feet
in size and a variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow the height
ZBA 8-V-92
Page 2 of 2
of the shed being the subject of the Ordinance to be 11.5 feet.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
41V61Q3&*
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 9, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-9-Z-92, SEMAR HOME BUILDERS
HICKORY & LINCOLN SUBDIVISION
LOCATION: 2320 W. LINCOLN
(NWC LINCOLN & HICKORY)
Zoning ftu
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for rezoning from an R -X Single Family District to an R-1 Single Family
District. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit a three -lot subdivision.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Tom McCabe, Engineer for the project, was present to represent the
request. Mr. McCabe indicated that the rezoning request is in order to allow a subdivision
of three lots.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning, explained that this request is consistent with the trend
in this area and the lots meet or exceed the minimum requirements for an R-1 Single
Family District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request, and there were no serious
issues raised. The Chairman read the rezoning standards and the Board felt the requested
rezoning is appropriate for this area.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single Family to allow the subdivision of three
lots.
-MOGIVISIOn Keguest
The Plan Commission reviewed the proposed Hickory and Lincoln Subdivision at their
meetings of February 19 and March 4, 1992. The subdivision application also included
request for waivers of certain public improvements:
1. Storm Sewer - The Plan Commission recommended against installing storm sewers
in ' the subdivision. The Engineering Coordinator explained that existing overland
drainage is to the northwest, and that a storm sewer is not reasonably available for
connection.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
2. Improvements - The developer asked that the Village accept a cash escrow at
this time in order to defer the construction of street improvements. The Plan
Commission recommends that improvements not be installed at this time, and that
a cash deposit for improvement costs was acceptable.
3. Simwalks - The Plan Commission recommends that sidewalks be installed at this
time, choosing to deny the developer's request to defer sidewalk construction.
4. Streetliphts - The Plan Commission recommends that a restrictive covenant be
recorded guaranteeing the installation of street lights at a date to be determined by
the Village.
With these considerations, the Plan Commission recommends approval of the Hickory -
Lincoln Subdivision.
Concerning the deferral of street improvements, staff would recommend that the street,
curb, gutter and sidewalk all be installed at this time. The Planning Department and
Engineering Division believe all street improvements can be properly designed and
constructed, and that there is no advantage to the Village to accept a cash deposit and defer
construction of these required public improvements.
DMC:hg
hfRE70FOORC DEDICATED
SOUrM L#W OF rhE SGUI'AEASr QUARrOt Cr rPCA1E7MPf*rST QU4fflrDT Oi SECrOV
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 9-Z-92 Hearing Date: February 27, 1992
PETITIONER: Semar Home Builders
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2320 West Lincoln
PUBLICATION DATE: February 11, 1992
REQUEST: A map amendment or rezoning from the existing
R -X Single Family Residence District to an R-
1 Single Family Residence District of Mount
Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow a three -
lot subdivision meeting all R-1 District
standards.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Ed Eigel, 2320 White Oak
Norman VanTil, 1316 South Hickory
Dave Lewandowski, 516 East Lincoln
Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being a rezoning from an RA Single Family
District to an R-1 Single Family District. The request was filed by Semar Home Builders.
Mr. Tom McCabe of Seton Engineering, introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated
that the application was filed to allow a rezoning to an R-1 Single Family District and to
permit a three -lot subdivision of this large parcel at the comer of Hickory and Lincoln.
Mr. McCabe stated that the proposed lot sizes would be similar to other lots in the area and
that the rezoning is consistent with other R-1 zoning in the immediate proximity.
Mr. Clements then summarized this request for the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained
that Semar Builders is the contract purchaser of this property and had requested the
rezoning from R -X to R-1 in order to allow a three -lot subdivision that met all regulations
of the R-1 District. Mr. Clements explained that the subdivision plat is currently being
processed through the Plan Commission, and then discussed the proposed lot sizes to
demonstrate to the Zoning Board that the lot sizes met all requirements of the requested
R-1 zoning. Mr. Clements noted that the R-1 zoning classification would be consistent with
the area. He explained that this area on the west side of the Village is undergoing a
transition from the large lot R -X zoning to more standard sized R-1 lots and that the three
proposed lots will be compatible with lot sizes in the general area, therefore, the proposed
rezoning was appropriate.
ZBA-9-V-92
February 27, 1992
Page 2
Chairman Basnik then asked for comments from members of the audience. Ed Eigel, 2320
White Oak questioned watermain extensions for the proposed subdivision, and Mr. McCabe
responded that the watermain would be extended up Hickory Street for this subdivision.
Mr. Lannon asked what the capacity for the watermain was, and Mr. McCabe stated that
this would be a six inch main with sufficient capacity to serve the three proposed lots and
any extension to the north.
Norman VanTil, 1316 South Hickory objected <to the rezoning because of a concern for
storm drainage from the three lots. Mr. Basnik explained that the Zoning Board of Appeals
was only reviewing the requested rezoning and that questions about stormwater drainage
should be directed to the Engineering Department.
Dave Lewandowski, 516 East Lincoln, objected to the rezoning and the three proposed lots.
He stated that he would prefer to see this area remain a neighborhood of large lots.
Chairman Basnik then reviewed the standards for a rezoning or amendment from the
Zoning Ordinance, and the Zoning Board generally discussed the rezoning standards. From
conversation, it was determined that the application met the rezoning standards of the
Zoning Ordinance and that the proposed rezoning to an R-1 District would be consistent
with the area and compatible with lot sizes to the north and to the south along Lincoln
Street.
Mr. Saviano pointed out that the new homes would have a positive impact on the area in
terms of property values and might be more beneficial than the existing single family home
on this lot.
There being no further discussion or comments, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the
request. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of
a rezoning from an R -X to an R-1 District. The motion was'seconded by Mr. Saviano.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
b7m. C� �
David M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
MT -1
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-9-Z-92
APPLICANT: SEMAR HOME BUILDERS
ADDRESS: 2320 W. LINCOLN AVE. (NWC LINCOLN & HICKORY)
LOCATION MAP:
wwrTc oAx
ol
303 310
305 312,
307 314
309 316
311 /
301
302,
301
303
300
302
F---7308
307
311
314
a
305
—MA
317
320
307
306
309
308
323
326
311
310
329
332"
313
312
335
N
31
314
34t
w—
7
316
OLN
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X, Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 143.4'x 1501 = 21,510 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: N/A
FALR.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting a rezoning from an R -X Single Family District to a R-1 Single
Family District. The purpose of the rezoning is to permit a three -lot subdivision.
aIN10191 WKKIIAE5 lv#*710 i
Summary of application: Semar Builders is the contract purchaser of the parcel at the
northwest comer of Lincoln Avenue and Hickory. The petitioner requested the rezoning
from R -X to R-1 in order to allow a three -lot subdivision that conforms to all R-1
regulations.
The subdivision application is being processed through the Plan Commission.
For the information of the Zoning Board of Appeals, the proposed lot sizes are as follows:
Lot 1 - 72' x 145.55' = 10,479 sq. ft.
Lot 2 - 72' x 145.55' = 10,479 sq. ft.
Lot 3 - 76' x 145,55' = 11,061 sq. ft. (comer lot)
The R-1 Districts require a 65 ft. minimum lot width, and a 8,125 sq. ft. area. Comer lots
require a 75 ft. width and 9,375 sq. ft. area.
The proposed subdivision meets all R-1 lot size requirements.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The proposed R-1 zoning classification will be
consistent with the area. This area on the west side of the Village is undergoing a transition
from large lot RA zoning to more standard size R-1 lots. The three proposed lots will be
compatible with lot sizes in this general area.
No objections or concerns were raised by other Village Departments concerning the
rezoning.
SUMMARY-4MCOMMENDATION
The petitioner must address the rezoning standards of the Zoning Ordinance. Provided this
is adequately done, staff would recommend approval of the rezoning. The proposed zoning
district and lot sizes are appropriate for this area.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
FEBRUARY 19, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order
by Chairman Weibel at 8:OOP.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street,
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL
Presentupon Roll Call
Absent:
Village Staff Present:
Press Staff Present:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Frank Boege
Ljrnn Kloster
Elizabeth Luxem
Thomas McGovern
William Navigato
Carol Tortorello
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Thomas Borrelli
Michael Sims, Staff Planner
Carolyn Arnold, Daily Herald
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mrs. Tortorello, that the minutes of
February 5, 1992 be approved as submitted. All members voted Aye and Mr.
Weibel declared the minutes approved.
SUBDIVISIONS
Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, 2320 West lincoln Street
The petitioner was requesting that three lots be created from one single lot
of record and Development Code modifications for streets, street lighting,
side walks, storm sewer, curb and gutter. The developer, Mr.Philip Semar and
Mr. Thomas McCabe, Sr. Chief Engineer for Seton Engineering company performing
the engineering for the development were present to explain the development.
Five development code modifications were being requested and all were questioned
by commission members. Mr. McCabe commented that the development code waiver
requests had been made at the recommendation of Staff and that the developer
was willing to drop the waiver request on the curb and gutter, street and side
walk improvements.
One request was for a waiver to permit the development to be built without
storm sewers. Staff recommended the granting of this request but contingent
upon the development of a storm water system for the site that was approved by
the Village Engineer. Nearby residents with property adjacent to the development
were present and voiced their concern over flooding conditions.
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1992
Edward and Shirlee Topel of 314 South Leonard directly across the street stated
that flood water now runs on their property and were concerned that without
adequate drainage this development would make it worse. Norman Vaniil of 316
South Helena was afraid his property adjacent to the development on the north
would get flooded. Mr. McCabe stated that currently, water drains off the
development site towards the northwest of the property onto vacant land. He
added that water from the development, which is on the west side of Hickory
Street, would not run off to the east side because the elevation on the west
side is lower than on the east side.
Discussion followed and some differences of opinion voiced concerning whether
curb and gutter, sidewalks and street lighting improvements should be installed
now or later. In response, the developer offerred to place money in•escrow to
cover the code modification requests.
Mr. Velasco commented that he would not vote to approve the storm sewer code
modification request that was contingent upon the development of a storm water
system that is approved by the Village Engineer.
Mr. Boege moved, seconded by Mr. Velasco, that the petitioner's request be set
aside until the storm water question was resolved. The vote on the motion was
3 Aye; 5 Nay and the motion failed.
After further discussion Mr. Weibel suggested a motion might be made to approve
the request for subdivision subject to three contingencies: (1) that it was
contingent upon the development of a storm water system for the site approved
by the village Engineer and that the Developer and the Village Engineer come
back to the Plan Commission with the approved plan (2) that the Developer will
put money into escrow for curb & gutter, street and sidewalk improvements and
(3) the street lighting code requirement to be waived contingent upon the
recording of a restrictive covenant guaranteeing the installation of a Village
street light at a later time when requested by the Village and that the developer
install conduit under all driveway aprons so future street lights cna be installed
along Hickory without damaging the aprons. Mr. McGovern moved, and seconded by
Mrs. Luxem, to approve the developers request for subdivision subject to these
contingencies. The vote was 4 Aye; 4 Nay. 'Motion failed for lack of a majority.
Mr. Navigato explained that he voted against the motion because,in his opinion,
the installation of sidewalks should be done now and not be delayed.
Mr. Navigato moved, and seconded by Lynn Kloeter, that the request for sub-
division be approved subject to; (1) contingent upon the development of a storm
water system approved by the Village Engineer and that the developer and the
Village Engineer cane to the Plan Commission with the approved plan (2)that the
request to waive requirements for sidewalks on Hickory and Lincoln be denied,
(3) that the request to waive Code requirements for curb & gutter and street
improvements be approved contingent upon the developer putting money into escrow
to cover the cost of these improvements when they are done,(4) the street lighting
code requirement to be waived contingent upon the recording of a restrictive cove-
nant guaranteeing the installation of a Village street light at a later time when
requested by the Village and that the developer install conduit under all drive-
way aprons. The vote was 5 Aye; 3 Nay. Motion passed.
A. Status of Revision of Development Code
Mr. Sims reported that Staff has started an effort on the Development Code
revision however the main thrust has been on the Zoning Code. When that is
completed full effort on the Development Code will follow. At the present
time, Staff is waiting for input an storm and sanitary water from Engineering
and Inspection Services.
B. Ccmprehensive Affordability Strategy Status Review
Mr. Sims reviewed the Village effort on the current year CHAS plan and the
monitoring of it. Five items covered were senior citizen housing, rehabili-
tation of senior citizens homes, rental assistance, first time home buyers
program and providing opportunity for homes for the mentally ill. Mr. Sims
stated that March will be the sixth month of this CHAS year and they will
contact agencies to see how they are doing. He also commented on meeting
with CEDA Northwest and other agencies dealing with the homeless problem.
They are looking into the possibility of a centralized site for the homeless.
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
In connection with the Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, Mr. Boeqe asked why
Staff had suggested that the developer request the development code modifi-
cations. Mr. Sims said he wasn't present at the time so couldn't answer it.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:45P.M.
'Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary
JJ
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES
PAGE 3
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 1992
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. community Development:
Nc report
B. Comprehensive Plan:
No report
C. Development Code:
No report
D. Text Amendment:
Nc report
NEW BUSINESS
A. Status of Revision of Development Code
Mr. Sims reported that Staff has started an effort on the Development Code
revision however the main thrust has been on the Zoning Code. When that is
completed full effort on the Development Code will follow. At the present
time, Staff is waiting for input an storm and sanitary water from Engineering
and Inspection Services.
B. Ccmprehensive Affordability Strategy Status Review
Mr. Sims reviewed the Village effort on the current year CHAS plan and the
monitoring of it. Five items covered were senior citizen housing, rehabili-
tation of senior citizens homes, rental assistance, first time home buyers
program and providing opportunity for homes for the mentally ill. Mr. Sims
stated that March will be the sixth month of this CHAS year and they will
contact agencies to see how they are doing. He also commented on meeting
with CEDA Northwest and other agencies dealing with the homeless problem.
They are looking into the possibility of a centralized site for the homeless.
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
In connection with the Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, Mr. Boeqe asked why
Staff had suggested that the developer request the development code modifi-
cations. Mr. Sims said he wasn't present at the time so couldn't answer it.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:45P.M.
'Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MCUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
MARCH 4, 1992
•-r
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order
by Chairman Weibel at 8:OOP.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street,
Mcunt Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL
Present upon Roll Call;
Absent:
Village Staff Present:
Press Staff Present:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Thomas Borrelli
Lynn Kloster
Elizabeth Luxem
William Navigato
Carol Tortorello
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Frank Boege
Thomas McGovern
Michael Sims, Staff Planner
Patrick O'Toole, Daily Herald
Mrs. Luxem moved, seconded by Mrs. Tortorello, to approve the minutes of
February 19, 1992 as submitted. All members voted Aye. Minutes approved.
SUBDIVISIONS
Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, 2320 West Lincoln Street
Thesubject subdivision was essentially approved at the prior meeting but was
contingent upon the development of a storm water system approved by the Village
Engineer and that the developer and Engineer present the approved plan to the
Plan Commission.
Mr. Thomas McCabe, representing the developer and Mr. Jeff wulbecker, Village
Engineering Coordinator were present to explain the system for storm water
run off from the site. Basically, the water would run off to the northwest of
the property as it does at the present time. A swale would be constructed along
the east and north sides running to the northwest corner of the site. Mr. Wul-
becker stated that the elevations were such that the swale would take 31-2 feet of
water before it would run onto adjacent property to the north. He added that
since the development is less than one acre it does not cross the threshold for
detention requirements and releasing the storm water as sheet flow at the north-
west corner of the site is the most appropriate drainage system.
Mr. Weibel invited comments from the visitors present. Mr. Edward Topel of 314
South Leonard commented that he hoped the system would work and if the water
went that way he had no objection, however, he had a feeling the situation wculd
get worse. Mr. Norman Vantil of 316 South Helena expressed similiar thoughts and
hoped the development would not result in more water run off.
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2
MEETING OF MARCH 4, 1992
Mr. Weibel acknowledged the concerns of the residents and expressed the hope
that the storm water system as developed would be successful so that water
will not run across the street and onto their property.
Mrs. Luxem moved, and seconded by Mr. Navigato, to approve the development
code modification for storm sewers and in place of storm sewers, the developer
will provide storm water run off in accordance with the Village Engineering
plan. The vote was 5 Aye; 2 Nay. Motion passed.
Mr. Navigato moved, and seconded by Mrs. Luxem, that the Hickory Lincoln Sub-
division be approved subject to the contingincies and code modifications pre-
viously approved by the Plan Commission. The vote was 5 Aye; 2 Nay. Motion
passed.
Mr. Velasco stated that he had voted against the motions because he believed
the storm water problem could have been handled better and also, he was negative
tc all the development code modifications asked for. He felt the developer was
just passing on the cost of the improvements needed. Mr. Wiebel stated that he
had voted against the motions because he felt the storm water problem was not
adequately addressed. He felt there should be an overall storm water run off
plan for the whole area.
Mr. Weibel remarked that these issues should be addressed during the review
of development code revisions.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development: No report
B. Comprehensive Plan: No report
C. Development Code: Nc report
D. Text Amendment: No report
OLD BUSINESS
Mr. Velasco reported that he had some additional information concerning
railroad signals. On the Soo Line a button can be pressed to disconnect the
signal during a train stop. However, in Mt. Prospect there are three tracks
which complicates the situation.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Velasco reported that a new parking lot has been put on the old Wille
property.
Mr. Sims reported that on March 21 a number of people will be going to Lake
Forest to look at their operation and if any of the Plan Commission members
were interested in going, to let him know.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business the meeting was adjourned at 9:25P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary
CAF/
3/27/92
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R -X TO R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE) DISTRICT AS IT
PERTAINS TO PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED Avjib� W. LINCOLN
a3�
WHEREAS, Semar Home Builders (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) , has filed an application to rezone the property
commonly known as 2023 West Lincoln Street (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property), legally described as follows:
Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, being a
subdivision in the west half of the southwest quarter of the
southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 10,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from R -X to R-1 (Single Family Residence) District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 9-Z-92, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
February, 1992 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having
been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the lith day of
February, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of
ZBA 9-Z-92 and have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to
a R-1 (Single Family Residence) District.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
1992.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk I
CAF/
3/31/92
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR
PROPERTY GENERALLY KNOWN AS 2320 WEST LINCOLN STREET
WHEREAS, Semar Home Builders (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has requested modifications from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property commonly known
as 2320 West Lincoln Street (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property) and legally described as follows:
Lots 1, 2 and 3 in Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision, being a
subdivision in the west half of the southwest quarter of
the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter of Section
10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting the following modifications
from the Development Code in conjunction with the creation of a 3
lot single family subdivision:
1. To waive the required installation of storm sewers;
2. To permit a cash deposit guaranteeing installation of street
improvements at a future date;
3. To defer the installation of sidewalks until the street is
installed; and
4. To authorize a Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing installation
of street lights until such time as the Village determined.
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modifications from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property at their regular meetings on
February 19, 1992 and March 4, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendations
relative to the modifications requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant the following
modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16):
1. To waive the requirement to install storm sewers; and
2. To waive the requirement to install street lights, provided
a Restrictive Covenant is executed guaranteeing installation
of street lights at a future date, to be determined by the
Village. Street light conduit is to be installed at this time
under the driveways of the 3 proposed homes.
F2
Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision
Modifications from Development Code
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: That, as a condition on the Petitioner to install
required street in conjunction with this development, the Village
states that the home owners in the Hickory -Lincoln Subdivision will
not be assessed for any additional street improvements for a period
of ten (10) years from the date the Village officially accepts the
public street.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CRAIRMA��
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
MARCH 4, 1992
SUBJECT:
ZBA-10-V-92, WILLIAM F. SCOTT
LOCATION:
507 GO-WANDO
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Mr. and Mrs. William Scott of 507 GoWando Avenue.
The variation was filed to allow a 14'-4" rear yard setback instead of 25 foot as required by
Ordinance.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Mr. and Mrs. William Scott were present to represent their request. They
indicated that their house faces GoWando, but their front yard is on the side street WaPella.
The addition is proposed in the area that is technically the rear yard, but that this area is
actually a sideyard.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning, explained that this variation is the result of our
Zoning Ordinance requirement that a front yard be determined by the narrowest part on
a corner lot. He explained that the petitioner's home faces GoWando, and that the addition
is in a sideyard. He noted that the adjoining home has a typical interior sideyard, and that
the proposed addition would provide a setback that is sufficient for a sideyard.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the petition. It was noted that no
objectors were present for this request.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a variation to allow the 14'-4" rear yard setback instead of the 25 foot as
required by Ordinance.
DMC:hg
N a 0 A v g
PROPERTI '—INE
F
i
i r
c
r � k
I
S'Jti.Y BRA
d FKAMRFc OENCE ut
wk, 4
04
0 T wo. l 3 �" s Fr�nposEn aot>rr�a�
ET :N6 .s o;zY +
{� IORTN OF HOusF/ m"
+9 IID SE RAZED I
-- PP,D P E QTY L I u E5
4
NO RTH
Is 0 S 6 7
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 10-V-92
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Hearing Date: February 27, 1992
William Scott
507 Go-Wando
February 11, 1992
Variation of Section 14.1102.0 to the reduce 25
ft. required rear yard to 14'-4" to allow the
construction of a room addition.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this request as a variation to reduce the 25 foot required rear
yard to 14'-4" to allow the construction of a room addition at 507 GoWando.
Mr. William Scott introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained that
he would like to do a room addition to his existing home. He noted that his house faces
and is oriented towards GoWando, however, the narrow side of the lot is on WaPella Street.
Therefore, the area of the proposed addition on the east side of the house is the rear yard,
and the 25 foot requirement is proposed to be reduced to 14.4 feet. Mr. Scott explained
that there still would be a sufficient setback to this lot line, and that the addition would
have no adverse impact on the neighboring property.
Mr. Clements then summarized the request for the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained
that the Scott's reside at the southeast comer of GoWando and WaPella, and that the front
yard is technically on WaPella Street, therefore, the rear yard with a 25 foot required
setback is the area proposed for the room addition. Mr. Clements noted that the 1,300
square foot addition would be for a new kitchen, family room, and two -car garage. He also
stated that, while this is the rear yard by Ordinance, this yard functions as a sideyard due
to the placement of the house on the lot.
ZBA-10-V-92
February 27, 1992
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Clements further explained that the property to the east is a typical interior lot with a
sideyard abutting the Scott property. As such, the proposed rear yard variation will have
no adverse impact on the neighboring home, as these two homes function side by side with
interior side yards.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was noted that the
proposed variation provides sufficient open space at this location, and that the required rear
yard reduction would have no impact on the neighbors as this area really is more of a
sideyard.
There being no further discussion or specific questions, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion
on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of a
variation to reduce the 25 foot required rear yard to 14'-4" at 507 GoWando. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
David M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
PC,-
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 18, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-10-V-92
APPLICANT: WILLIAM F. SCOTT
ADDRESS: 507 GO-WANDO
LOCATION MAP:
4, ti
NJ A, 0 0
L ri 0 CO 0
WA PELLA
Jn Ln Lp
0 0 0
1�p 100 i� 1. SO'S
O
'Ile 4,41
(j, 0 0 0
0
Ob
01
NJ
iH1 LUSI
0 0 0
LA L� -j UN L4
Ul U,
0 0
C13 a)A. N, 0 y N 0 ON 4, 0
I OKA i OKA
U Ln 'A 4' '0'
LA
IQ M
0 fn LA L. UM
0
0 00 <M P. 1-2
ELMHURST AVE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 104'x 1281 = 13,312 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 32% (Proposed)
F.A.R.: .24
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting that the 25 foot required rear yard be reduced to 14'-4" to allow
the construction of a room addition at 507 Go-Wando.
Summary of application: The Scott's reside at the southeast comer of Go-Wando Avenue
and WaPella. They are proposing to construct a 1300 square foot addition to their home
for a new kitchen, family room and two -car garage. A portion of the rear of the house will
be demolished to make room for the addition. The petitioner's home is oriented towards
Go-Wando, however, the front yard is technically on WaPella, the narrow side of the lot.
The room addition is on the east side of the lot, in the required rear yard. The 25 ft. rear
yard is reduced to 14'-4" with this room addition. While this is the rear yard by ordinance,
the yard functions as a sideyard due to the placement of the house on the lot.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The property to the east is a typical interior lot, with
a sideyard abutting the Scott property. As such, the proposed rear yard variation will have
no adverse impact on the neighboring home, as these two homes function with interior side
yards.
No objections were raised by other Village departments. Inspection Services notes that a
grading and drainage plan will be required with the building permit.
Roldia .0
The staff would recommend approval of the request. As stated, this required rear yard is
physically a sideyard at this residence, and the proposed variation provides sufficient open
space at this location. The hardship in this case is caused by the Ordinance restriction
requiring the narrow side of the lot to be considered the front yard. This necessitates the
variation, and could not be anticipated by the petitioner.
DMC:hg
CAF
3/27/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 507 GO WANDO,
WHEREAS, Janice L and William F. Scott (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of 'Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 507 Go Wando (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 13 in Block 10 in Prospect Park Country Club
Subdivision, being a subdivision of the southeast 'quarter
of Section 11, and the South 15 acres of the East Half
of the Northeast, Quarter of Section 11, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
in Cook County, Illinois;
NoW
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to
allow a fourteen foot four inch (141 411) rear yard setback, rather
than the required 25 feet, to accommodate an addition to an
existing house; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 10-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of March,
1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Prospect Herald on the 11th day of February, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 10-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF ,THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth h6reinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a fourteen foot four inch (141 411)
rear yard setback in order to accommodate an addition.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
FA
ZBA 10-V--;92
Page 2 of 2
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 9, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-11-V-92, ZBA-I2-SU-92, JOHN T. AND KATHY JUDD
LOCATION: 401 OJIBWA TRAIL
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for a variation and a Special Use Permit filed by Mr. and Mrs. John Judd of
401 Ojibwa Trail. The variation was filed to allow a reduction of the front yard to 28'-2"
from the required 40 foot setback, and to allow a 34% lot coverage in a front yard rather
than the maximum 25%; also a variation to allow a circular driveway, a variation to allow
a 34 foot wide driveway rather than 21 feet; and a Special Use Permit to allow a garage
designed to house more than two motor vehicles.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 27, 1992.
At the meeting, Mr. Judd and Mr. Fred Thulen, architect, were present to represent the
request. They indicated that due to the Zoning Ordinance requirements on a corner lot for
front yard determination, the addition requires a variation. The circular drive is requested
so that vehicles would not have to back on to Lincoln Street. The additional width of the
driveway is needed if the Special Use Permit for the garage is approved.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning, indicated that the variations are required because the
Zoning Ordinance states that the narrow portion of a lot is the front yard. The required
front yard at the petitioner's home is on Ojibwa Trail. Mr. Clements stated that the
proposed setback matches that of the house to the south, therefore, the request results in
variations that are consistent with the area. The circular drive is an appropriate request on
a residential collector street such as Lincoln Street.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. They questioned the
driveway width at the circular section. The architect indicated 12 - 14 feet is the proposed
width. The Zoning Board members felt that 12 foot was sufficient.
Accordingly by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board
approve the variations to reduce the 40 foot required front yard to 28'-2" and to allow a
34% front yard lot coverage; a variation to allow a circular driveway, a variation to allow
a 34 foot wide driveway; and a Special Use Permit to allow a garage to house more than
two motor vehicles with the added condition that the circular portion of the driveway not
exceed 12 feet in width.
DMC:hg
4 E
•D i
FI
1$'
2
�l�Jtliaf7 Y./C�l�'V �C�
Q T�
Y
a '
1.
T1014
19= 0�
Pl
1
R.
�4V
3
a
OL_ti_1
LTot-
Y t
h
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 11-V-92 and Hearing Date: February 27, 1992
12 -SU -92
PETITIONER: John Judd
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
401 Ojibwa Trail
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 11, 1992
REQUEST:
The petitioners are requesting the following in
order to construct a room addition: 1. Variation
of Section 14.1002.A to reduce the 40' required
front yard to 28'2", and to allow a 34% lot
coverage in a required front yard rather than
the maximum of 25%; 2. Variation of Section
14.115.A to allow a circular driveway and
variation of Section 14.115.0 to allow a 34' wide
driveway rather than 21 ft.; 3. A Special Use
per Section 14.1001.C.6 to allow a garage
designed to house more than 2 motor vehicles.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this request by stating that it was a request to construct a room
addition and to reduce the 40 foot required front yard to 28 feet along with a 34% lot
coverage, and a variation to allow a circular driveway and a 34 foot driveway width, along
with a Special Use to allow a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles.
Mr. John Judd introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals along with the Project
Architect, Fred Thulin. Mr. Judd described the request and explained that the proposed
setbacks are consistent with the area. Mr. Judd noted that the required front yard on his
lot is on Ojibwa Trail, the side street, but that his house is oriented towards Lincoln Street.
Mr. Judd stated that a room addition and a garage expansion on the west side of the house
is proposed to reduce the 40 foot required yard on Ojibwa Trail to 28 feet. Mr. Judd
pointed out that the house to the south received a similar variation several years ago and
that his proposed addition matches the setback of the house to the south, therefore, there
ZBA-11-V-92, ZBA-12-SU-92
February 27, 1992
Page 2 of 3
would be no adverse impact on the adjoining property. Mr. Judd stated that the circular
driveway is necessary so members of his family would not have to back out onto Lincoln
Street, and that the extra driveway width of 34 feet is necessary to provide the sufficient
driveway width for the requested three -car garage. Mr. Judd stated that the three -car
garage is necessary to provide security and protection for the family vehicles, and that he
had noted many three -car garages being constructed on larger homes in the community.
Therefore, this request would not be out of character with larger homes on large lots in the
Village.
Mr. Clements then summarized the request for the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that
the petitioners were proposing two room additions at their home, and noted that the room
addition on the east side of the house required no variations. The room addition on the
west side of the house encroaches into the 40 foot required front yard on Ojibwa Trail, and
because this is the narrow dimension of the lot, Ojibwa Trail is the required front yard. Mr.
Clements noted that the 28 foot setback, as proposed, matches the setback of the property
to the south, and that this proposed three -car garage matches the Lincoln Street setback of
the house, therefore, the proposed setbacks for the additions match existing conditions in
the neighborhood.
Mr. Clements also noted that the 34 foot driveway is necessary for access to the three -car
garage, and the circular driveway is justified because Lincoln Street is a residential collector
street rather than a typical residential street, and there is a higher volume of traffic on
Lincoln Street. Mr. Clements noted that there would be no adverse impact on the
neighborhood with this request, but noted that, with the proposed lot coverage variation in
the required front yard, drainage becomes important particularly along unimproved Ojibwa
Trail. Mr. Clements noted that a grading plan would have to be submitted along with the
building permit for review by the Engineering Division.
Chairman Basnik then asked for questions by the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Lannon
noted that while the request is for a 34 foot driveway, the driveway tapers to the street, and
that the full width is not 34 feet. Mr. Lannon also questioned the width of the circular
driveway and asked if a 12 foot dimension would be sufficient. Mr. Thulin and Mr. Judd
both noted that a 12 foot width would be sufficient for the circular driveway.
Mr. Cassidy explained that he would be concerned about drainage in the west yard and
cautioned the petitioner to submit a drainage plan, and work with the Engineering Division
on final grading.
There being no further comments or discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the
request. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a
variation to reduce the 50 foot required front yard to 28-2"; to allow a variation for a
circular driveway, and a variation to allow a 34 foot driveway. Mr. Lannon stated that the
motion is subject to a 12 foot driveway width for the circular driveway. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Pratt.
ZBA-11-V-92, ZBA-12-SU-92
February 27, 1992
Page 3 of 3
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Mr. Brettrager then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of the
Special Use to allow a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
David M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CRAIRK%V_
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
FEBRUARY 18, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-11-V-92, ZBA-12-SU-92
APPLICANT:
JOHN T. AND KATHY JUDD
ADDRESS:
401 OJIBWA TRAIL
LOCATION MAP:
403
4 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T C 0 U N T R Y C L U S
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X, Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 1041 x 2001 = 20,800 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 31%
F.A—R.: .195
405
403
415
NI WA
419
Cl
421
421
WAN
4 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T C 0 U N T R Y C L U S
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X, Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 1041 x 2001 = 20,800 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 31%
F.A—R.: .195
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is making the following requests with this application:
A variation of Section 14.1002.A to reduce the 40 ft. required front yard to
28'-2", and to allow a 34% lot coverage in a required front yard rather than
the maximum 25%.
2. A variation of Section 14.115.A to allow a circular driveway, a variation of
Section 14.115.0 to allow a 34 ft. wide driveway rather than 21 feet.
3. A Special Use permit per Section 14.1001.C.6 to allow a garage designed to
house more than two motor vehicles.
m WraWKIKSINUM!t;
Summary of application: The Judd's reside at the southeast corner of Lincoln Street and
Ojibwa Trail. They are proposing two additions to their home. The room addition on the
east side of the house requires no variations. The room addition on the west side of the
house encroaches into the 40 ft. required front yard on Ojibwa Trail. Because this is the
narrow dimension of the lot, the frontage on Ojibwa Trail is the required front yard. The
applicant proposes reducing the 40 ft. required front yard to 28'-2". The addition at this
location includes a garage expansion by Special Use permit to allow a three -car garage. A
34 ft. wide driveway is necessary for access to the three -car garage, and a circular driveway
is proposed in front of the house so vehicles do not have to back into the street.
Please note that the addition on the west side of the house, and the wider driveway, create
the need for a lot coverage variation in the required front yard. The RA District allows
a maximum of 25% front yard coverage. The proposal is for 34%.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioner's home faces Lincoln Street, but the
required front yard is on the side street, Ojibwa Trail. The addition on the west side of the
house maintains the same setback from Lincoln Street as the existing house. Therefore, the
addition and required variations would not impact the established setbacks on Lincoln
Street.
Concerning the setback on Ojibwa Trail, the proposed addition matches the setback of the
home to the south. Also, note that this area is heavily landscaped, so any impact is further
reduced.
In analyzing the lot coverage variation in the required front yard, drainage becomes
important. The Engineering Division points out that drainage is towards Lincoln Street, and
that a grading plan will have to be submitted to assure that this drainage pattern remains.
This is particularly important near Ojibwa, as this is an unimproved street. The total lot
coverage is 31% indicating that this large lot is not overbuilt.
The circular driveway is proposed so automobiles will not have to back onto Lincoln Street.
This street is a residential collector, and carries a higher volume of traffic than a
neighborhood street. The circular drive appears reasonable considering this fact, however,
the petitioner should speak to the necessity of the circular drive.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
PIEPAR—IMENIAL COMMENTS
Other than the grading comment stated by Engineering, there were no concerns raised by
other Village Departments.
1671:0
Staff has no objections to the variations and Special Use, and recommends approval. The
proposed additions result in setbacks that are consistent with the area, so the character of
the neighborhood is maintained.
The petitioner is cautioned about lot grading. As a result of the additions, a detailed
grading plan is required with the, building permit and final site grading is subject to
Engineering approval.
DMC:hg
/CAF
3/30/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY MOWN AS 401 OJIBWA TRAIL
WHEREAS, John T. and Kathy A. Judd (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for variations and special
use as provided in Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 401 Ojibwa Trail
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) , legally described
as:
Lot One in Phillips-Jeuck Subdivision of Lots 1, 2 and the
North 1/2 of Lot 3, together with the 33.0 foot vacated street
lying east of and adjoining sales Lots 1, 2 and the North 1/2
of Lot 3, all in Willson and Florence's Country Club
Subdivision of the East 233.0 feet (as measured on the North
line) of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of the Southwest Quarter
(1/4) of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, according to plat of said Phillips-
Jeuck Subdivision registered in the office of the Registrar
of Titles of Cook County, Illinois on August 6, 1976 as
Document Number 2886242;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek the following:
1. A variation from Section 14.1002.A to reduce the 40 foot required
front yard to 281 210;
2. A variation to allows a 34% lot coverage in a required front
yard, rather than the maximum of 25%;
3. A variation from Section 14.115.A to allow a circular driveway;
4. A variation from Section 14.115.0 to allow a 34 foot wide
driveway, rather than the permitted 21 feet; and
5. A Special Use, pursuant to Section 14.2001.0.6 to allow a garage
designed to house more than 2 motor vehicles.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 11-V-92 and ZBA 12 -SU -92 before the Zoning
Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
February, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prosoect Herald on the 11th day of February, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village have given further consideration to the variations and special
use requested and have determined that the same satisfies the
standards set forth in Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board
of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the
Village to grant the requests.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTIQN ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO; The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
ZBA 11-V-;.92 and ZBA 12 -SU -92
Page 2 of 2
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the following:
I A variation from Section 14.1002.A to reduce the 40 foot required
front yard to 281 211;
2. A variation to allows a 34% lot coverage in a required front
yard, rather than the maximum of 25%;
3. A variation from Section 14.115.A to allow a circular driveway,
such driveway shall not exceed twelve feet (121) in width;
4. A variation from Section 14.115.0 to allow a 34 foot wide
driveway, rather than the permitted 21 feet; and
5. A Special Use, pursuant to Section ' 14.2001.C.6 to allow a garage
designed to house more than 2 motor vehicles.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall
remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604.B
of Chapter 14 of the village Code, the variations granted herein shall
be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins
within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in
the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXONy LAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEM, �1DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 1, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-V-92, EDWARD R. EGLE
LOCATION: 2320 WEST WHITE OAK
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Edward R. Egle. The application was filed to allow
the reduction of the 40 foot required front yard setback of the R -X Single Family District,
Section 14.1002, to 28.3 feet to allow the construction of a room addition.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of March 26, 1992.
At the meeting Mr. Egle presented testimony in support of the request. He indicated that
the addition would match the existing house in style and material.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, explained that this is a large comer lot and that the addition would
be in line with the neighboring properties. Mr. Forsythe also indicated that this area is
experiencing a transition to R-1 zoning and that the requested setback is consistent with that
required in an R-1 Single Family District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and determined that the
request would provide a setback similar to adjoining properties, and consistent with R-1
setbacks in the area. Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
that the Village Board approve a variation to allow a front yard of 28.3 feet instead of 40
feet in order to allow the construction of a room addition.
DMC:hg
� tio�iFY�•
( PG�Rry.
z
WHIle 6001K SIKE�l
1
p4
rFl.,rasev vpDrfloll
� P,
OXISN& R>*IVEIace
132.Z�
lIE�1 Lw•tG.
fte-oOFl&UM axISTIPGr
TO A4.7w f'VK W4.v-
"9TAIII40- P—'TIvE
i r`avlc wk -'s,00 A?Pf-x,)
M
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 14-V-92
Hearing Date: March 26, 1992
PEITI ONER:
Edward and Gale Egle
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
2320 White Oak
PUBLICATION DATE:
March 10, 1992
REQUEST:
Variation to reduce 40 ft. required front yard
of R -X Single Family District, Section 14.1002,
to 28.3 ft. to allow construction of a room
addition.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced the agenda item and described this as a variation to reduce the
40 foot front yard of an R -X Single Family District to 28 feet to allow the construction of
a room addition.
Mr. Ed Egle introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and explained that he
would like to extend his house to the south towards Lincoln Street for the purposes of
constructing a new large family room and master bedroom suite. He explained that he
would like to reduce the 40 foot front yard to 28 feet thereby, requesting a variation of 12
feet. The petitioner stated that the room addition would be of the same design as the
existing house with a matching roof line, window treatment and the same color of brick.
Mr. Egle stated that he believed that the reduced front yard would have no adverse impact
on the area and that there were many homes in this neighborhood built on 30 foot front
yard setbacks.
ZBA-14-V-92
March 26, 1992
Page 2
Mr. Ray Forsythe then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr.
Forsythe pointed out that the property is a large lot of over 18,000 square feet and that this
lot meets the R -X lot size requirements. He pointed out however, that there are many lots
in this area of R-1 lot sizes and most of these homes are constructed with the R-1 setback.
He pointed out that the lot to the west of, the subject site maintains a front yard setback
similar to that being requested with this variation.
Mr. Forsythe also noted that the property to the east is currently vacant but it was of a size
that would be sufficient for a three -lot R-1 subdivision. He noted that there is a general
trend in this neighborhood of rezoning large lots to R-1 zoning and that the requested front
yard variation would provide a setback very similar to a 30 foot requirement of an R-1
District. He explained that the staff recommends approval of the request because the
proposed setback would match the property to the west, and also the setback would provide
a yard that was similar to the 30 foot setback of other R-1 properties in the general area.
Mr. Basnik inquired as to the percent of lot coverage on the site and Mr. Forsythe noted
that lot coverage was proposed at 26% with this large lot.
Mr. Lannon concurred with the staff report and noted that a more typical R-1 setback is 30
feet and that the 28 foot yard proposed with this request is very close to the R-1 standard.
Mr. Lannon also asked about any plans the petitioner might have for the existing garage.
Mr. Lannon explained that this garage is built at an existing 15 foot setback and it projects
in front of the existing setback pattern of houses along this block. Mr. Lannon thought that
if there were any plans for this garage, perhaps it could be moved back to the same setback
as the house. Mr. Egle explained that he has no plans to remove or replace the garage at
this time; and Mr. Clements pointed out that any new garage would have to meet setback
requirements.
Mrs. Skowron confirmed that if the garage was damaged and rebuilt it would have to be
moved to a conforming setback or receive a variation to be rebuilt at this same location.
Mr. Clements confirmed that a variation could be requested to rebuild a garage at the same
location.
Chairman Basnik then summarized the standards for variations from the Zoning Ordinance
and the Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the standards. It was determined that
the proposed room addition met the applicable standards and that the variation would have
no adverse impact on surrounding properties.
ZBA-14-V-92
March 26, 1992
Page 3
Accordingly, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mrs. Skowron moved that the
Zoning Board recommend approval of a variation to allow a 28 foot front yard for the
property at 2320 West White Oak. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon.
Upon roll call: AYES: Cassidy, Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This, recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectively submitted,
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning and Zoning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
201
--
GIL BASNIK, CHV"
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
MARCH 16, IM
CASE NO.:
ZBA-14-V-92
APPLICANT:
EDWARD R. EGLE
ADDRESS:
2320 WEST WHITE OAK
LOCATION MAP:
219
PM
z Par
TIM 0 w, w t4 rr
00*kw 0
2011 M(-
I--
207 208
21'3214
214
219 220
225 226
231 232
237
V.) VA
L
mmppw C"
201
--
200
—
211
200
201
207
209
210
204
206
206
219
—
212
219
224
223
225
228
227 230
211
—
230
2451240
234
311314
—
235 ,
211
cli
246
WHITE
OAK
307
314
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X
LOT SIZE: 18,226.75 Sq.Ft.
% COVERAGE: 18.46% (Proposed 26.28%)
FA.R.: .07 (Proposed .15)
707
mmppw C"
301
302
301
300
X03
310
c
307
308
303
302
305
312
=
0
311314
4
305
304
307
306
307
314
317
—
320
309 1
308
309
316
323
3 32
29
335
335
1
326
332
134::
311
310
313
312
1_5
314
116
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is seeking a variation to reduce the 40 foot required front yard setback of the
R -X Single Family District, Section 14.1002, to 28.3 feet to allow the construction of a room
addition.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to the front
of the existing house. The lot is a corner lot with the narrowest portion on 'White Oak.
Currently, the front door faces White Oak, however, the proposed addition indicates the
door to be relocated to Hickory Avenue. The house is set back approximately 35 feet from
Hickory Avenue.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The subject property contains 18,236 square feet,
meeting the R -X lot size requirement. However, there are many R-1 lots in this area, with
homes constructed at the less restrictive R-1 setbacks. The lot to the west maintains a front
yard setback similar to that being requested by the applicant. The property to the east is
currently vacant, however, staff feels that this property could be rezoned to R-1 and
subdivided into three lots. There is a general trend in this area to R-1 Zoning and this
request would allow similar setbacks of an R-1 zoned district.
OTHER DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
No major objections or concerns were stated by other staff. Inspection Services Department
and Engineering both indicated that drainage plans must be submitted with building permit
applications.
Staff recommends approval of this request. Because of the nature of the surrounding
properties as well as the general trend in this area to rezone to R-1 Single family, the
proposed front yard encroachment will generally fit in with the area.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMEXDIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 1, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-V.92, KENNETH T. NIEBUHR
LOCATION: 906 SEE.GWUN
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Kenneth Niebuhr of 906 SeeGwun. The variation was
filed to allow the replacement of an existing 17'-8" driveway with a 20 foot driveway for a
one -car garage. Section 14.3016 allows a maximum driveway width of 15 foot for a one -
car garage.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of March 26, 1992. At the
meeting, Kenneth Niebuhr presented information that the driveway was being replaced and
that their future plans were to add to the existing garage so that it would house two cars.
Ray Forsythe, Planner, explained that this request was not uncommon for this area and that
the driveway width would not contribute to a lot coverage problem.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed this request. They indicated that with a
one -car garage additional parking was needed and with the applicant's future plans to add
to the existing one -car garage, a wider driveway would be allowed.
Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a variation to allow a driveway with a width of 20 feet.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 16-V-92
IWAVVIC010:11M
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Hearing Date: March 26, 1992
Kenneth T. Niebuhr
906 SeeGwun Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: March 11, 1992
REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a variation of
Section 14.3016 to increase the maximum
driveway width from 15 ft. to 20 ft. for a one -
car garage in an R-1 Single Family District.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced this next agenda item and stated this is a request to
increase the maximum driveway width of 15 feet for a one -car garage to 20 feet for the
property at 906 SeeGwun Avenue.
The petitioner, Kenneth Niebuhr introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and
stated that he proposed to construct a wider driveway for better off-street parking for his
family automobiles. He stated that the request was filed for a 20 foot driveway but that he
would reduce it to 19 feet as pointed out in the staff report. However, Mr. Niebuhr stated
that he did not want to taper the driveway width at the property line because he has a large
van and the total driveway width is necessary to provide proper parking for the van. Mr.
Niebuhr acknowledged that the driveway approach in the parkway would be limited to the
15 foot maximum. The petitioner also explained that he was hoping to add on to his
existing one -car garage to provide a two -car garage and that, at this time he was getting
quotes to do this future addition. He explained that, if the two -car garage were constructed,
he believed that it was appropriate to go ahead and install the wider driveway apron in the
parkway at this time.
Mr. Forsythe summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that
the petitioner would like to enlarge an existing 17 1/2 foot driveway to 20 feet. Mr.
Forsythe pointed out that, in this neighborhood, there are many one -car garages that are
ZBA-16-V-92
March 26, 1992
Page 2
served by an 18 or 20 foot driveway, and that these wider driveways provide better off-
street parking for residents.
The Zoning Board then generally discussed the request and there was discussion about the
necessity of tapering the driveway to meet the 15 foot maximum paving width in the
parkway and whether the consideration of a future garage addition could allow the 20 foot
apron to be installed at this time.
Mr. Basnik believed it was reasonable to allow a wider apron in the parkway to be installed
at this time, if the petitioner was intending to construct a complete two -car garage.
Mr. Saviano stated that it was his opinion that, inasmuch as there is an existing one -car
garage at this time, the apron width should be left to the maximum 15 feet and that when
a garage addition is constructed the petitioner can come back and request to install the
wider apron at that time.
Mr. Lannon pointed out that a neighboring property has a similar driveway width; and the
Zoning Board of Appeals acknowledged that wider driveways would not be uncommon or
inappropriate in this neighborhood.
Accordingly, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Cassidy moved that the
Zoning Board of Appeals approve a 20 foot driveway width for the property at 906
SeeGwun Avenue. The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion approved by a vote of 7-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectively submitted,
&, %c4walvl�
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning and Zoning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
1000
GIL BASNIK, CRAI AM
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
MARCH 16, 1992
CASE NO.:
ZBA-16-V-92
APPLICANT:
KENNETH T. NIEBUHR
ADDRESS:
906 SEE-GWUN
LOCATION MAP:
1 901 900
903 902
J 905
NIEMV #40' 908
908
911 908
1-2 A?
915 914
917 916
9191 918 1
1 1 923
SUNSET
1001
1003
1005
go 0 -* 1007
0 0 0 '00 1006
0 0 0) CA a) 100
PALM 1011
1 020
I n(),o)
Y)
901
903
905 902
907 904
909 906
911 908
908
913 9 0
10
915 912
917 914
919 916 16
921
0
923
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1
LOT SIZE: 8,125 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 28%, (Proposed 29%)
F-kR.: .21
1000
1002
1004
1001
1003
1005
go 0 -* 1007
0 0 0 '00 1006
0 0 0) CA a) 100
PALM 1011
1 020
I n(),o)
Y)
901
903
905 902
907 904
909 906
911 908
908
913 9 0
10
915 912
917 914
919 916 16
921
0
923
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1
LOT SIZE: 8,125 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 28%, (Proposed 29%)
F-kR.: .21
Gil. Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUEST
The petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 14.3016 to increase the maximum
driveway width from 15 feet to 20 feet for a one -car garage in an R-1 Single Family District.
PLANNING AND ZONING CQMMEM AND CONCERNS
Summary of application: The applicant is seeking to replace an existing 17'-8" driveway
with a 20 ft driveway for a one -car garage.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The petitioner has indicated that the additional
pavement is necessary to provide sufficient parking of two vehicles in the driveway. The
property is improved with a one -car garage. The property to the north, which would be the
most impacted by the request, has 'submitted a letter in support of the variation. The
increased pavement width does not contribute to a lot coverage problem.
No major concerns were expressed by other Village staff. Engineering and Inspection
Services note that the grading shall be maintained so that existing drainage patterns are not
altered. Inspection Services also suggested that the driveway be tapered to 15 feet at the
property line and make the approach 15 feet wide with a 2 foot flare at the curb.
SUMMARYIRECOMMENDATIO
Staff has no objections to this request noting that the closest neighbor has indicated support
of the variation.
The additional pavement does not appear to significantly alter the character of the
neighborhood, as there are other wider driveways in this block.
Staff would recommend that the variation be approved with the condition that the driveway
be tapered to 15 feet at the property line and the approach be 15 feet wide with a 2 foot
flare at the curb.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, jtI E MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEME NTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: APRIL 2, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-134�1, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
(A�
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a request to amend Section 14.107. The amendment will amend the non -conforming uses
in its entirety and provide a revised Section 14.107 on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures
and Uses.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meetings on March 12 and
26, 1992. At the meetings, Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, summarized
the request for the Zoning Board and indicated that the current provisions of the Zoning
Ordinance on non -conforming uses are adequate but that they do not make a proper
distinction between non -conforming uses and structures.
Mr. Clements indicated that it is important that the Zoning Ordinance specifically address
uses that don't meet the requirements of a zoning district and how such uses are eliminated,
changed or expanded. Also, there should be requirements that address structures that don't
meet bulk requirements of a zoning district, and how such structures are repaired or
enlarged. The current ordinance allows buildings built prior to December 31, 1964 or in
Cook County and annexed to the Village which are non -conforming structures to be
extended without regard to the current requirements. Mr. Clements feels that this provision
needs to be changed so that all existing structures meet the current provisions.
Mr. Clements indicated that the proposed wording for non -conforming structures allows for
them to be enlarged, maintained or repaired, but that no new non -conformity should be
created. The draft language states that non -conforming driveways, patios and sidewalks may
be replaced in the same location, however, such structures should meet the applicable lot
coverage requirements.
The proposed amendment allows for non -conformities on lots 50 feet or less to be extended
in the required rear yard or side yard, provided that the non -conformity is no more than
50% of the current rear yard or side yard requirement.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. The members generally felt that the
proposed language simplifies the process in the Zoning Ordinance and is a more reasonable
standard for residents to meet.
John Fulton Dixon
April 2, 1992
Page 2
Chairman Gil Basnik felt that the purpose of a non -conforming section is to gradually phase
out non -conforming structures and felt that the 50% provision did not meet his objective.
He felt that all additions to non -conforming structures should meet current standards. This
also gives adjoining property owners an ability to comment on a variation application.
The Zoning Board members had considerable discussion on the proposed language and its
impact on current ordinance provisions and the types of activity in the community. The
majority of the members felt that the changes were positive and that the amendment was
being done at this time so that spring and summer construction could occur and that many
property owners would not have to file minor variation requests and appear before the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
Accordingly, by a 6-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
amendments to Section 14.107 of the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance as presented by
staff.
DMC:hg
3/19/92 Revision
ARTICLE
Non -Conforming Buildings, Structures and Uses
PuMQse
The purpose of this Article is to provide for the regulations of non -conforming
buildings, structures and uses, and to specify those circumstances and conditions under which
those non -conforming buildings, structures and uses shall be permitted to continue.
n
Buildings and structures which do not conform to the bulk regulations of any zoning
district or any other provision of this ordinance shall be subject to the following regulations:
a. Ability to Continue Non -Conforming Building or Structure
Any lawfully established non -conforming building or structure which is devoted
to a permitted ,use in a zoning district may continue to be used for any
permitted use.
b. Enlargement, Repair, Alterations, and Replacement
Any non -conforming building or structure may be enlarged, maintained,
repaired or altered, provided that no such enlargement, maintenance, repair
or alteration shall either create an additional non -conformity or increase the
extent of the existing non -conformity. However, on lots 50 feet or less in
width, a non -conforming building or structure may be extended in a required
rear yard or side yard, provided that such non -conformity is no more than 50%
of the current rear yard or sideyard requirement.
In residential zoning districts, existing non -conforming driveways, patios and
sidewalks may be replaced in the same location without complying with the
bulk regulations of this ordinance. However, any such replacement structure
must meet applicable lot coverage requirements.
C. Damage or Destruction
In the event that any non -conforming building or structure is damaged or
destroyed to the extent of more than fifty percent (50%) of the replacement
value of such building or structure, such building or structure shall not be
rebuilt or restored unless it conforms to all regulations of the zoning district
in which it is located.
When such building or structure is damaged by any means to less than fifty
percent (50%) of replacement value, such building or structure may be
reconstructed or repaired, provided that such repair or restoration begin and
is pursued to completion within one year of the date of such damage. Any
such repair or restoration shall be done in compliance with current building
codes.
A use in a building, structure, or on vacant land, which is not a permitted use in the
zoning district in which the use is located, shall be considered a non -conforming use
and subject to the provisions below:
a. Ability to Continue Non -Conforming Use
Any existing non -conforming use of part or all of a building, structure or non-
conforming use of land, may be continued as long as it meets the requirements
of this Section.
b. Repair and Maintenance
Normal maintenance and incidental repair or replacement, and installation or
relocation of non-bearing walls, non-bearing partitions, fimres, wiring or
plumbing, may be performed on any building or structure that is devoted in
whole or in part to a non -conforming use. Any such repair or maintenance
shall be done in compliance with current building codes.
C. Expansion
A non -conforming use shall not be extended, expanded, enlarged or increased
in intensity in any building or structure.
d. Relocation
No building or structure that is occupied in whole or in part by a non-
conforming use shall be relocated to any other location unless the entire
building or structure and the use thereof shall conform to all regulations in
the zoning district.
e. Change In Use
A non -conforming use of land or of a building or structure shall not be
changed to any other use than a use permitted in the zoning district. When
such non -conforming use has been changed to a permitted use, the building
or structure shall only be used thereafter for a use permitted in the zoning
district.
f. Discontinuance
When a non -conforming use of part or all of a building or structure, or non-
conforming use of land, is discontinued or abandoned for a period of 180
consecutive days, such use shall not be re-established or resumed. Any
subsequent use of such building, structure or land shall comply with all
regulations of the zoning district.
9. Damage or Destruction
In the event that any building or structure which is occupied in whole or in
part by a non -conforming use is damaged or destroyed to the extent of more
than fifty percent (50%) of replacement value of the building or structure,
such building or structure shall not be restored unless such building or
structure and the use thereof conform to all the regulations of the zoning
district. When such damage or destruction is fifty percent (50%) or less of
replacement value of the building or structure immediately prior to such
damage, the building or structure may be repaired or reconstructed and used
for the same non -conforming purpose, provided such repair or damage
completed within 12 months of the date of the damage or destruction. Any
such repair shall be done in compliance with current building codes.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 13-A-92 Hearing Date: March 12, 1992
and March 26, 1992
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY: N/A
PUBLICATION DATE: February 26, 1992
REQUEST: To amend in its entirety Section 14.107 Non-
conforming Uses of Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to provide a revised Section 14.107
on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures, and
Uses.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Mr. Clements explained that this is a public hearing that was continued from March 12 for
the purpose of making several minor changes to the originally submitted language. Mr.
Clements stated that the text had been amended as requested by the Zoning Board of
Appeals. He pointed out that the major change was in Item B of Non -conforming Buildings
and Structures and provided for non -conformities on lots 50 feet or less for a non-
conforming building or structure to be extended in the required rear yard or side yard,
provided that the non -conformity is no more than 50% of the current rear yard or side yard
requirement. Mr. Clements stated that this was believed to be a better compromise
between the initial draft language that required any proposed addition or improvement on
a lot to meet the current setback requirements.
Mr. Clements again explained that the current Zoning Ordinance allows any non -conformity
to be extended on a home built prior to December, 1964; or any home built in Cook County
and annexed to Mount Prospect. Mr. Clements pointed out that these two circumstances
provide for structures to be perpetually grandfathered and not subject to any ordinance
requirements. Mr. Clements stated that this proposed language allowed reasonable
additions to buildings on 50 foot lots provided that the additions would at least meet 50%
of the ordinance requirement.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12/26, 1992
Page 2
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was believed that this was a good
compromise that addresses the types of issues that the Zoning Board deals with on 50 foot
lots.
Mrs. Skowron and Mr. Lannon pointed out that this is, more restrictive than the current
ordinance which has the December, 1964 and the Cook County provisions, but it is also a
better alternative to require any new construction or addition on a lot to meet current
setback requirements.
Chairman Basnik indicated that he was not at the March 12 meeting but that he had some
concerns with the proposed language. The Chairman believed that any addition or new
construction on any lot should meet the current setback requirements or a variation
requested. Mr. Basnik used several examples on non -conforming structures and how
additions to non -conforming structures could adversely affect a neighboring property.
Because of concern for adjoining property owners, Mr. Basnik believed that any non-
conforming situation should require a variation so that adjoining property owners could have
an opportunity to review the request.
Zoning Board members reminded Chairman Basnik that the existing ordinance allowed any
non -conformity to be extended without requiring a variation, and that the two circumstances
of buildings built before December, 1964 and buildings built in Cook County and annexed
to Mount Prospect provided that any type of addition to a building without a public hearing.
Members of the Zoning Board discussed their thinking at the March 12 meeting and
indicated how this proposed language was more restrictive than the current provisions, but
allowed reasonable additions within 50% of the setback requirement to occur.
Chairman Basnik stated that he understood the existing non -conforming section and the
draft language but it was his opinion that any addition to a non -conforming structure should
require a variation. The Chairman stated that the purpose of a non -conforming section is
to gradually phase out non -conforming structures and that as long as a new ordinance is
being prepared the Zoning Board should look with compliance with all the new
requirements, and not set up a 50% provision.
The Zoning Board then generally discussed the request and Mr. Lannon pointed out that
he believed the draft language was a good attempt at recognizing the types of improvements
that are made on 50 foot lots in the Village and he believed that deleting the December
1964 provision and the Cook County provision was an improvement to the Zoning
Ordinance. He also explained that this amendment was being done at this time so that
spring and summer construction could occur and that many property owners would not have
to file minor variation requests and appear before the Zoning Board of Appeals.
The Zoning Board then continued discussion of the request and considerable discussion
ensued concerning the draft language and its impact on current ordinance provisions and
the types of activity in the community.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12/26, 1992
Page 3
Chairman Basnik then asked for a motion on the request, and Mr. Prettrager moved that
the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a revised Section 14.107 on non-
conforming buildings and structures and uses. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Skowron.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Skowron and Cassidy
NAYS: Basnik
Motion carried by a vote of 6-1.
Chairman Basnik voted in opposition to the request and again explained that he believed
any new construction on a Jot should meet current ordinance requirements or a variation
should be requested.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
David M. Clements
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR. MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 13-A-92
Hearing Date: March 12, 1992
PETITIONER:
Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
N/A
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 26, 1992
REQUEST:
To amend in its entirety Section 14.107 Non-
conforming Uses of Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to provide a revised Section 14.107
on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures, and
Uses.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Dennis Saviano
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Two residents
Mr. Cassidy introduced the only agenda item of the evening being a request by the Village
of Mount Prospect to amend Section 14.107, Non -conforming Uses of the Zoning Ordinance
in its entirety, and provide a revised section on Non -conforming Buildings, Structures, and
Uses.
David Clements, Director of Planning, summarized the request for the Zoning Board of
Appeals and indicated that the current provisions of the Zoning Ordinance on non-
conforming uses are adequate, but that they do not make a proper distinction between non-
conforming uses and structures. Mr. Clements explained that it's important that the Zoning
Ordinance specifically address conditions for non -conforming uses, and that there be specific
conditions for non -conforming structures which do not meet the bulk requirements of the
zoning district.
Mr. Clements then described the non -conforming uses, Section 14.107 in the Zoning
Ordinance, and used an example that the ordinance states that a non -conforming use cannot
be expanded. Mr Clements indicated that this expansion is not defined, and that it can be
interpreted that even a conforming addition to a non -conforming structure is prohibited.
Mr. Clements stated that this example indicates the difficulty in administering this section
of the ordinance.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12, 1992
Page 2
He also stated that a further provision provides that buildings built prior to December 31,
1964 or in Cook County and annexed to the Village, meet different requirements for
additions. Mr. Clements stated that this section of the ordinance allows any non-
conforming structure to be extended without regard for current requirements. Mr. Clements
stated that the disadvantage to this section is that sometimes it is difficult to determine the
actual age of a building when looking at the December 1964 provisions, but that, more
importantly, he stated that he was concerned about the ordinance accepting development
in Cook County and allowing expansions to structures built in Cook County that did not
meet Mount Prospect requirements.
Mr. Clements then summarized the proposed wording for non -conforming structures and
indicated that he believes it's reasonable that non -conforming structures can be enlarged,
maintained or repaired, but that no new non -conformity should be created. Mr. Clements
also pointed out that the draft language states that non -conforming driveways, patios, and
sidewalks may be replaced in the same location; however, such structures should meet the
applicable lot coverage requirements. Mr. Clements then described the proposed wording
on non -conforming uses and indicated that this wording better defined how a non-
conforming use within a building can be expanded or enlarged, or changed to other uses.
Mr. Clements then suggested that the Zoning Board consider an alternative that would allow
non -conforming structures on 50 foot lots to have a certain non -conformity extended,
provided that the non -conformity is no more than 50% of the current ordinance
requirement. Mr. Clements stated that this would be an example of addressing particular
development problems on 50 foot lots and this would still allow reasonable flexibility for
certain kinds of room additions and improvements.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then discussed the request. Mr. Cassidy indicated that he
believed that the new section is an attempt to modernize standards on non -conforming uses
and structures, and that he agreed that there should be more control over structures built
in Cook County and annexed to Mount Prospect.
Mr. Lannon indicated that he believed that it's reasonable to allow extension of non-
conforming structures up to 50% of the ordinance requirement on a 50 foot lot, but pointed
out that he would be opposed to any such extension in a required front yard.
Mr. Lannon also explained the reasons for proceeding with this amendment at this time; and
noted that he believed this would be an important change to make in the Zoning Ordinance
prior to spring construction season, when there is a heavier number of building permits
being reviewed. Mr. Lannon believed that the proposed amendment might eliminate some
more minor variation requests and help residents get spring projects underway quicker.
The Zoning Board then generally discussed the concept of allowing non -conforming
driveways, patios and sidewalks to remain in their present location. Mr. Cassidy stated that
there may be circumstances where an existing 24 foot driveway, for example, creates storm
water run-off problems on a neighboring property.
ZBA-13-A-92
March 12, 1992
Page 3
Mrs. Skowron stated that she was concerned, for example, about a replacement of a 30 foot
driveway and the overall appearance of that amount of paving in a front yard. Mr.
Clements explained that this particular section is tied back to only allowing replacement
of those types of structures if the overall lot coverage is within the permitted maximum of
the Zoning Ordinance. Mr. Clements stated that in this way there would be more open
space on a lot to absorb storm water run-off than there would be impervious surface. In
theory existing conditions would not be made worse by replacing such a structure.
Mrs. Skowron asked how much time would be saved in the permit process with these
amendments, and Mr. Clements stated that the building permits for minor structures such
as driveways, are typically issued within a day or two, but that most permits are finished up
within a requirement of 20 days in the Building Code.
Mr. Brettrager stated that the proposed wording simplifies the process in the Zoning
Ordinance and is a more reasonable standard for residents to meet.
Mr. Lannon stated that this wording helps relieve many burdens that are caused on residents
and that he believed the advantages outweighed the disadvantages. Mr. Clements stated
that he believed there could always be an extreme situation pointed out or discussed that
could not be remedied with these requirements, but that allowing more reasonable
replacements of structures and additions to buildings would benefit more residents in the
long run than occasions where the worse case example would be found.
Mr. Clements then discussed the timetable for moving this item on to the Village Board and
the Zoning Board discussed the possibility of asking the Village Board to waive second
reading to complete this amendment as soon as possible so it could be in place for spring
construction.
There being no further discussion, Mr. Cassidy asked Mr. Clements to revise the wording
in a proposed amendment as discussed; and to bring the item back to the Zoning Board for
their meeting of March 26. Mr. Lannon moved that the meeting be continued to March 26
for a final review of the revised section of non -conforming uses and structures. The motion
was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Cassidy
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
Respectfully submitted,
D.M, b^
David M. Clements
,(ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSI -jr
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W_
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 3, 1992
CASE NO.: ZBA-13-A-91
APPLICANT- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REQUE
This application for an amendment to the Zoning Ordinance was filed by the Village of
Mount Prospect. The application was filed to amend in its entirety Section 14.107, Non -
Conforming Uses, and to provide a revised Section 14.107 on Non -conforming Buildings,
Structures and Uses.
IrLANNING ANV ZONING!COMMEN.Ts AND CONCERNS
Summary of application: The current provisions of the Zoning Ordinance on non-
conforming uses are adequate, but they do not make a proper distinction between non-
conforming uses and non -conforming structures. Staff believes that it is important that the
Zoning Ordinance specifically address uses that don't meet the requirements of a zoning
district and how such uses are eliminated, changed or expanded. Also, there should be
requirements that address structures that don't meet bulk requirements of a zoning district,
and how such structures are repaired and enlarged.
A draft of the new section is attached, as is a copy of the existing section. Also, please note
that the proposed includes provisions to allow existing driveways, patios and sidewalks to be
replaced without meeting bulk regulations, with the exception of applicable lot coverage
requirements.
QJHER DEJ!ARTMENTAL COMMENTS
All Village departments reviewed the proposed section, and there were no significant
comments.
513PdARYMMOWENDAMON
Staff would recommend approval of the revised non -conforming section, in order to have
specific regulations for non -conforming uses and structures in the Zoning Ordinance.
DMC:hg
ORDINANCE NUMBER
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS-
PECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS TO BORROW FUNDS FROM THE
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL REVOLVING FUND.
WHEREAS the VILLAGE of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois (the "VILLAGE"), operates its sewerage system (the
"System") and in accordance with the provisions of Article Sev-
en, Section Six of the Illinois State Constitution; and
WHEREAS the PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the
VILLAGE and in the best interests of public health, safety and
welfare to improve the System, including the following:
The project consists of improvements to the Village's sani-
tary sewer system and combined sewer system in selected areas of
the Village. These areas are referred to as the See-Gwun and
Golf Flooding Area, Prospect Manor and North Main Flooding Area,
Central and Wa-Pella Flooding Area, See -Gwen and Milburn Sani-
tary Area and Hatlen. Heights Sanitary Area and Fairview Gardens
Sanitary Area.
Improvements in the See-Gwun and Golf Flooding Area include
construction of a separate relief storm sewer on Sunset
Road, See-Gwun Avenue, and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue connecting to an
existing storm sewer at Lonnquist Boulevard. Improvements
in the Prospect Manor and North Main Flooding Area include
construction of a combined parallel relief sewer on High-
land Street, Emerson Street, Gregory Street, and crossing
Rand Road connecting to the MWRDGC TARP system. Lateral
combined relief sewers will also be constructed north of
Highland Street on Fairview Avenue, Prospect Manor Avenue,
Eastwood Avenue, Elmhurst Avenue, Russel Avenue and Main
Street. Lateral Combined relief sewers will also be con-
structed from Main Street to Emerson Street on Memory Lane
and Gregory Street. Improvements in the Central and Wa-
Pella Flooding Area include construction of a separate
relief storm sewer on Central Road, Wa-Pella Avenue,
6?
Gowando Ave. and Hi-Lusi Avenue to Weller's Creek. A new
discharge to Weller's Creek will be constructed at Hi-Lusi
Avenue. Improvements in the See-Gwun and Milburn Sanitary
Area include construction on a sanitary relief pump station
on Lincoln Street east of We -Go Trail. Improvements in the
Hatlen Heights Sanitary Area include construction of over-
sized sanitary relief/storage sewers on Hatlen Avenue from
Lincoln Street to Bonita Avenue. Improvements in the
Fairview Gardens Sanitary Area include rehabilitation of
the existing sanitary lift station on Horner Lane and con-
struction of oversized sanitary relief/storage sewers an
Horner Lane, Thayer Street, and Stevenson Lane together
with any land or rights in land and all electrical, mechani-
cal or other services necessary, useful or advisable to
such construction and installation (the "Project"), all in
accordance withthe plans and specifications therefore
prepared by consulting engineers to the VILLAGE: and
WHEREAS the estimated cost of constructing and install-
ing the Project, including engineering, legal, financial, and
other related expenses, is $9,961,000, and there are insuffi-
cient funds on hand and lawfully available to pay such costs; and
WHEREAS such costs are expected to be paid for with a
loan to the VILLAGE from the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency through the Water Pollution Control Revolving Fund, said
loan to be repaid from a Home Rule Retailers Occupation Tax of
one quarter of one percent (.25%) of the gross receipts and such
loan is authorized to be accepted at this time pursuant to the
Act; and
WHEREAS pursuant to and in accordance with the provi-
sions of the Act, the VILLAGE is authorized to borrow funds from
the Water Pollution Control Revolving Loan Fund in the aggregate
principal amount of $9,961,000 for the purpose of providing
funds to pay the costs of the Project; and
WHEREAS , the loan to the VILLAGE. shall be made pursu-
ant to a Loan Agreement, including certain terms and conditions,
between the VILLAGE and the Illinois Lnvironmental Protection
Agency;
NOW THEREFORE be it ordained by the PRESIDENT AND
BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the VILLAGE of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois as follows:
SECTION ONE. INCORPORATION OF PREAMBLES
The Corporate Authorities hereby find that the recit-
als contained in the preambles to this ordinance are true and
correct and do incorporate them into this ordinance by this
reference.
SECTION TWO. DETERMINATION TO BORROW FUNDS
It is necessary and in the best interests of the VIL-
LAGE to construct the Project for the public health, safety and
welfare, in accordance with the plans and specifications, as
described, that the System continue to be operated in accordance
with the provisions of the Act, and that for the purpose of
constructing the Project, it is hereby authori-zed that funds be
borrowed by the VILLAGE in an aggregate principal amount not to
exceed $9,961,000.
SECTION THREE. ADDITIONAL ORDINANCES
The Corporate Authorities may adopt additional ordi-
nances or proceedings supplementing or amending this Ordinance
providing for the entering into the Loan Agreement with the
Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, prescribing all the
details of said Loan Agreement, and providing for the collec-
tion, segregation and distribution of the revenues of the sales
tax, so long as the maximum amount of said Loan Agreement as set
forth in this ordinance is not exceeded and there is no material
change in the Project or purposes described herein. Such addi.-
tional ordinances or proceedings shall in all instances become
effective in accordance with the Act and other applicable law.
This Ordinance, together with such. additional ordinances or
proceedings, shall constitute complete authority for the enter-
ing into of said Loan Agreement under applicable law.
However, notwithstanding the above, the VILLAGE may
not adopt additional ordinances or amendments which provide for
any substantive or material change in the scope and intent of
this Ordinance, including but not limited to interest rate,
preference or priority of any other ordinance with this Ordi-
nance, parity of any other ordinance with this Ordinance, or
otherwise alter or impair the obligation of'the VILLAGE, to pay
the principal and interest due to the Water Pollution Control
Revolving Fund without the written consent of the Illinois Envi-
ronmental Protection Agency.
SECTION FOUR. LOAN NOT INDEBTEDNESS OF VILLAGE
Repayment of the loan to the Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency by the VILLAGE, pursuant to this Ordinance is
to be solely from the revenue derived from a one quarter of one
percent (.25%) sales tax and the loan does not constitute an
indebtedness of the VILLAGE within the meaning of any constitu-
tional or statutory limitation.
SECTION FIVE. ACCEPTANCE OF LOAN AGREEMENT
The PRESIDENT and the BOARD OF TRUSTEES hereby author-
ize acceptance of the offer of a loan through the Water Pollu-
tion Control Revolving Fund, including all terms and conditions
of the Loan Agreement as well as all special conditions- con-
tained therein and made a part thereof by reference. The PRESI-
DENT and BOARD OF TRUSTEES further agree that the loan funds
awarded shall be used solely for the purposes of the project as
approved by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency in
accordance with the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement.
SECTION SIX. AUTHORIZATION OF PRESIDENT TO EXECUTE.
The PRESIDENT is hereby authorized and directed to
execute the Loan Agreement with the Illinois Environmental Pro-
tection Agency on or before 19_.
SECTION SEVEN. SEVERABILITY
If any section, paragraph, clause or provision of thi-s
ordinance shall be held invalid, the invalidity of such section,
paragraph, clause or provision shall not affect any of the other
provisions of this ordinance.
SECTION EIGHT. REPEALER
All ordinances, resolutions or orders, or parts there-
of, in conflict with the provisions of this ordinance are to the
extent of such conflict hereby repealed.
SECTION NINE. This ordinance shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
Gerald L. Farley - PRESIDENT
VILLAGE of Mount Prospect
Cook County, Illinois
Attest:
Carol A. Fields - VILLAGE Clerk
VILLAGE of Mount Prospect
Cook County, Illinois
IEPALOAN.ORD/FILES/SEWERS
A
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM CM USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: March 12, 1992
SUBJECT: NWMC Stormwater Management Planning Committee
I have reviewed the report from the Northwest Municipal Confer-
ence on a proposed stormwater management planning committee, and
I believe it may be beneficial for the Village to adopt a resolu-
tion supporting this concept.
Some day in the near future, they may be able to exert some
pressure on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers to make improve-
ments to the Des Plaines River, including a berm up near
Seminole. It concerns us that, even though the Weller Creek
Drainage District is still a viable agency, it is very inactive,
and this proposed committee may have to take over supervision of
this waterway.
One of the only questions I have is, when and if the Cook County
plan is approved, will all projects have to be submitted to the
committee for review and a permit/sign-off issued?
HU,61LO IJIUL
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
STRMMGMT.COM/FILES/SEWERS
NWMC
NORTHWEST MUN(CIPAL CONFERENCE
AREGIONAL ASSOCIATION OFILLINOIS
1616 E GOLF ROAD MUNICIPALITIESAND TOWNSHIPS
DE S PLAINES, I L 60016 REPRESENTING A POPULATION OF OVER ONE MILLION
(708) 2969200 FAX 296-9207 FOUNDED IN 1958
TO: Mayors/Presidents of Municipal Members of
the Cook County St rmwater Management Committee
v ,arms
FROM:
Brian C. Nigbor, Project Coordinator
RE: Early Action of the Stormwater Management
Planning Committee
J"I'l Pa,K
DATE: February 6,,1992
Ij
Legislation was passed about a year ago that permits the
municipalities in Cook County, and the County of Cook, to
ally and coordinate their flood and stormwater mitigation
efforts. As you may know, your municipality lies within
one of the recognized watersheds in Cook County. As a
result, your municipality will be part of the Cook County
Stormwater Management Planning Committee's efforts as they
develop.
Attached is a resolution the Cook County Stormwater
I S Management Planning Committee would like your council or
board to entertain. The purpose of the resolution is to
raise awareness among municipal leaders as to the
stormwater management effort that is underway.
AC
The Northwest Municipal Conference has also considered and
endorsed this resolution.
OFFK'„ERS
The resolution highlights some key characteristics of the
Stormwater Management Planning Committee. First, the
purpose of the Committee is to coordinate stormwater
management projects and plans within Cook County to assure
they have no adverse impact on neighboring jurisdictions.
"a, N 8,(,
Secondly, the committee is to assist communities, and the
:
county, in developing stormwater management plans. A
third characteristic concerns the fact this effort will
require significant intergovernmental cooperation in order
to succeed. This is a municipal and county alliance, with
assistance from the Metropolitan Water Reclamation
District and Northeastern Illinois Planning commission.
No single jurisdiction is preeminent.
Please review the resolution at your earliest
convenience. Feel free to call if you have questions, or
would like to discuss this matter further.
Also attached is a copy of the legislation authorizing the
creation of the Cook County Stormwater Management
Planning Committee, maps showing the communities within
each Cook County Watershed, and a list of the temporary
representatives.
Thank you for your effort and time. Feel free to call
the Nortnwest Muniqipal Conference if you would like
additional information.
ms
enc.
Resolution Supporting a Countywide Flood and Stormwater
Mitigation Effort
WHEREAS, flooding and stormwater runoff has become a
serious Cook County problem that can threaten both citizens and
property; and
WHEREAS, many mitigation efforts have been
undertaken by individual jurisdictions, but it remains that
flooding and stormwater runoff is a regional problem requiring a
regional response; and
WHEREAS, the Illinois Legislature, in passing Public
Act 84-1463, authorized Cook County municipalities and the
County of Cook to forge an alliance for the purpose of improving
flood and stormwater control efforts; and
WHEREAS, this alliance shall be known as the Cook
County Stormwater Management Planning Committee; and
WHEREAS, the success of this alliance depends upon
the cooperation and commitment of the County and the
municipalities comprising the Cook County Stormwater Management
Planning Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the
Village/City/County
supports the Cook County Stormwater Management Planning Committee
and its charge to develop and coordinate stormwater management
plans and regulations within each of the Cook County watersheds
and ensure that stormwater management projects proposed for Cook
County have no significant adverse impact an neighboring
jurisdictions.
COOK COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING COMMITTEE AD HOC MEMBERS
NAME AGENCY REPRESENTING
Trustee Charles Larson
Roy McCampbell
President John Sinde
President Rudolph Banovich
Trustee Edmund Hayden
Mayor Mike Albrechdt
President Richard Falcone
President Al Larson
President Billie D. Roth
Neal DeSnoo
Joe Nevius
President Sheila Schultz
Village of Brookfield
Village of Schiller Park
Village of Westchester
Village of .Richton Park
Village of Midlothian
City of Des Plaines
Village of Northbrook
Village of Schaumburg
Village of Streamwood
City of Chicago
Cook County Forest Pres. Dist.
Village of Wheeling
West Cook Suburbs
West Cook Suburbs
West Cook Suburbs
South Cook Suburbs
South Cook Suburbs
North Cook Suburbs
North Cook Suburbs
Northwest Cook Suburbs
Northwest Cook Suburbs
City of Chicago
Cook County
Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission
LOWER DES PLAINES LOWER DES PLAINS
WATERSHED CONT.
48 Members
Arlington Heights(2)
Oak Park
Bellwood
Palatine
Bensenville
Park Ridge(2)
Berkley
Prospect Heights
Broadview
River Forest
Brookfield
River Grove
Buffalo Grove
Riverside(2)
Burr Ridge
Roselle
Chicago(5)
Rosemont
Countryside
Schiller Park
Des Plaines
Stone Park
Elk Grove Village(2)
Westchester
Elmwood Park
Western Springs
Forest View(2)
Wheeling
Franklin Park
Willow Springs(2)
Glenview(2)
Cook County
Hillside
Evergreen Park
Hilldale
Northbrook(2)
Hodgkins
Flossmoor
Indian Head Park
Justice
La Grange
Park Ridge(2)
La Grange Park
Glenwood
Lyons
Merrionette Park
Maywood
Wilmette
McCook
Lynwood
Melrose Park
Oak Forest(3)
Mount Prospect
Cook County
Niles(2)
Matteson
Norridge
Orland Park(2)
North Riverside
Northbrook(2)
Oak forest(2)
Northlake
Palos Heights
COOK COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLANNING COMMITTEE
(9 members = 7 Council Chairmen, Cook Co. Board President, NIPC President)
UPPER SALT CREEK
POPLAR CREEK
NORTH BRANCH CHICAGO
WATERSHED
WATERSHED
RIVER WATERSHED
8 Members
9 Members
15 Members
Arlington Heights(2)
Barrington Hills
Chicago(5)
Elk Grove Viltage(2)
Bartlett
Deerfield
Hoffman Estates(2)
Elgin
Glencoe
Inverness
Hanover Park
Glenview(2)
Palatine
Hoffman Estates(?)
Golf
Rolling Meadows
Schaumburg(2)
Kenilworth
Schaumburg(2)
South Barrington
Morton Grove
Cook County
Streamwood
Niles(2)
Evergreen Park
Cook County
Northbrook(2)
Hickory Hilts
Flossmoor
Northfield
Justice
Ford Heights
Park Ridge(2)
Lemont
Glenwood
Skokie
Merrionette Park
Lansing
Wilmette
Midlothian
Lynwood
Winn- ka
Oak Forest(3)
Markham
Cook County
note. numbers identify how many watersheds to which a municipality is a member.
TOTAL. NUMBER OF MUNICIPAL AND OTHER MEMBERS 124
CAL SAG
LITTLE CALUMET RIVER
MAIN COMBINED
WATERSHED
WATERSHED
SEWER AREA
25 Members
35 Members
9 Members
Alsip
Blue Island
Berwyn
Bedford Park
Calumet City
Chicago(5)
Blue Island
Calumet Park
Cicero
Bridgview
Chicago(5)
Evanston
Burbank
Chicago Heights
Forest view(2)
Chicago(5)
Country Club Hills
Oak Forest(3)
Chicago Ridge
Dixmoor
Riverside(2)
Crestwood
Dolton
Stickney
Evergreen Park
East Hazel Crest
Cook County
Hickory Hilts
Flossmoor
Justice
Ford Heights
Lemont
Glenwood
Merrionette Park
Lansing
Midlothian
Lynwood
Oak Forest(3)
Markham
Oak Lawn
Matteson
Orland Park(2)
Midlothian
Orland Hills(2)
Oak forest(2)
Palos Heights
Olympia Fields
Palos Hills
Orland Hitls(2)
Palos Park
Orland Park(2)
Summit
Park Forest
Willow Springs(2)
Phoenix
Worth
Posen
Cook County
Richton Park
Riverdale
Robbins
Sauk Village
South Chicago Heights
South Holland
Steger
Thornton
Tinley Park
University Park
Cook County
North :Branch
Chicago River
Watershed .
15 Members
Chicago(5)
Deerfield
Glencoe
Glenview(2)
Golf
Kenilworth
Morton Grove
Niles(2)
Northbrook(2)
Northfield
Park Ridge(2)
Skokie
Wilmette
Winnetka
Cook County
Waukegan
Rid- 12
9E1.YIC3I�RE
Reg•
North
Chicago
SUCKLEY
RTE. 137
Ro,
3
fi
RTE 176
PARK
AVE.
6
r
RTE.6U
Lake
Forest
RTE. 22
�y
Lincolnshire"'
told
Highland
Park
LAKE CO.
" S
Z`SC�K CO.
w>
r
.q
�C W
x
Skokie
C
PETER ST.
NT 14
w
r
Park
Ridge"
Chicago
�I/ 4
.Upper
Salt .-Creek
Watershed
7
no
8 Members
Arlington Helqhts(2A
Elk Grove Vittage(2)
Hoffman Estates(2)
Invernesses—"
Palatine
Rotting Meadows
Schaumburg(2)
Cook County
7
no
Cal -Sag
Watershed
Palos Park
Summit
Willow Springs(2)
Worth
Cook County
'00
1D SO, SxP
25 Members
2
IK
Chicago
0)
Alsip
o U, -
�ilNnen�k
(5
Bedford Park
M
Blue Island
_U
=
U
Bridgview
J.ri
Burbank
Chicago
Chicago(5)
. Evergresn
*pmt aPark
Chicago Ridge
Crestwood
Evergreen Park
Hickory Hills
Justice
Lemont
Merrionette Park
Midlothian
Oak Forest(3)
Oak Lawn
Orland Park(2)
Orland Hitls(2)
Palos Heights
Palos Hills
Palos Park
Summit
Willow Springs(2)
Worth
Cook County
'00
1D SO, SxP
Chicago
o U, -
�ilNnen�k
v
63RO ST.
M
J.ri
Chicago
. Evergresn
*pmt aPark
Palos Park
Summit
Willow Springs(2)
Worth
Cook County
MAIN COMBINED
SEWER AREA
9 Members
Berwyn
Chicago(5)
Cicero
Evanston
Forest View(2)
Oak Forest(3)
Riverside(2)
Stickney
Cook County
Little Calumet diver
Watershed
R ` W
N
Ch go
CAL SAG 3 ,, CHANNEL
Robbins Calumet
we a City z
Midlothian # w 2 K
Z
159TH ST
n 4 ark r 'a s �.
5
Hammond
10
1 VER
a
*:t iQ
Homewood-
aCADY
� wm
aw
x J�0 ' 701 Gary
� Q� C►,'�C�M+�"
{U OW A*
LINCOLN, HYMIr
M611gttr, "8� � R�'E 30
M n�e "w: M
0 am
A. w
a• to
35 Memberslxl;,,010 Oak Forest(2)
e
Blue Island -j Olympia Fields
Orland Hills(2)
Calumet City Orland Park(2)
Calumet Park
Chicago(5) Park Forest
Chicago Heights Phoenix
Country Club Hills Posen
Dixmoor Richton Park
Dolton Riverdale
East Hazel Crest Robbins
Flossmoor Sauk Village
Ford Heights South Chicago Heights
Glenwood South Holland
Leming Steger
Lynwood Thornton
Markham University
Park
Matteson University Perk
Cook County
Midlothian
W
cc
x
0
Poplar Creek
Watershed
X�/
Sam"glon
Hills
S"WORR
I�
Ut
axCI]
c;E co
Y
4 Members
Barrington Hills
Bartlett
Elgin
Hanover Park
Hoffman Estates(2)
Schaumburg(2)
South Barrington
Streamwood
Cook County
Aiuno3 *oo:
(2)s8upds•+w11yM
6ulyaayn
soulids uJa3saM
AVMll01 b� Ja3sayo3saK
►6Z.p NJed au03S
4Jed J011140S
.,„
aA0,0 3uowasoll
s JauMoa
alyasoa
�,,,��� ... (Z)aplsJaAla a1e143JON
Aa, ,
X 05 K aAOJg JOAla (Z)�IooigylJoN
c) � 38aJ0J JOA18
aPISJOAlb 43JON
" s3461ON 3oadsOJd a6P!JJON
(Z)a6Pl1! AJed (Z)sal!N
� aul3eled
loadSOJd 1unOW
06z.l aw s Aw4 i PiegwOl m� Jed )1e0 Jed as0 l law
�003OW
-A d c�
3AV HIUON „, es Std poonAPW
w suoA l
o6eoiy0 °.., �Jed a6ueJg el
T"
Od Ad ONIAWI � a6UBJs e1
xied Peaty uetpul
3k1Y9F4 o
. � .x sut>I6pop
v61 31d ," „; 00 30vd nO atePl l lH
..._W. ........ w �ioo0
A�b aplslllN
,y f.:. (Z)nalAuayJ
�Jed ul IVOJA
sanN ,. 6,ngwne4og (2)nalA ISOJoj
ss. yd ad 4100 1Jed P00wu13
Alfmllo,l IsazzttioN o6 -I Wabel l !A aAOJ9 113
Maauai!D
sauleld sap
aP!sAJ1umo:)
� (5)o6eal4a
.4oaaow,oN :,,, awlelsd a6pla Jing
es its nd 33oNnc, aAOJ!) ole;;ng
plat mooJg
00 3HV1 NOIAPSOJg
Aala�Jag
�all!Auasuag
zz 31d poonllag
(2)S14610H uo16uliJV
SJagWW IR9
A
9G I 1d 3AV 3ldVW P94S OIBM,
saueingial seuield sad
~� aamol
P.A. $6-14612 861h GENERAL ASSFMIILr 1 19911 REGULAR SESSION P.A. 86-1,163
iAilniFdind+it: of Aulu action tN of Uis Sao -tion arat-tho-yaF'licil int WAY dxdre nal -this Fight
encu-annuttly,du-iwufft Liv�srFt# annivereaey-daGd filar spa€i+++.
(Source: P.A. 86-773.)
I Clupter 120. 11-101 et seq.
r Paragriph 1107 of this chapter.
((:h_ 67112, par. 1107) IS.IhA. ch. 67%, 111071
§ 7. Program benefits. (a) After Whorl a %'rugram Participant who has met the
Pre gram requirements terminates participation in the Program, the State i`reasurer s
certify to the Director of Itevenue and the Director Chairman of the Illinois Housing
Devchopmeat Authority that whelhar: -
11) T1te Participant is all eligible haute huye r umt is er€ifi" tet receive tilt bens tits of
t#ie 1'rogrann_} The Panic Ihas t2)-witbn+ 3 nutnths after terminationes is partic-
ipation in the Program hiBecome tJiegwrtidiltara6)at indd the owner, as sale owner,
n
Icaut in coalition or Joint -tenant with right of survivorship, of a fee simple absolute
interest to real estate #acated in this State and "copied by him as a principal residence,
A Partes out Fhtay, before or an teeex oration of aft < 4 month psri�,a _to the
Treasurer for air nth to 5 month gxtenstou two acquire such .ut iiaterest in residential real
estate. he reasurer slgd1 a�i�ye or It
a a aht;aUons for an extension based; on
standarl addt'in rakes IiromulgaU7 life rfi easut r_
t3i(A) For a period of 9 years or more immediately preceding termination of
participation in the Program, tae Participant cPaisited monies with tele program Staw
Trduncror for investment under parsgraph4II,42}Or-44),of subsection (b) of Section 5,1 at
least 2 deposits were made in each 12 month period during that 3 year period, and the
total all nor deposited unions withdrawals) in each such 12 ounith p erioll equals amounts
established by the_Treasurer in rules proutulp aced by tb Treasurer for that Iturpose. at
�u;t �tY.� of tliulutui aitunf}r3t�d`epo¢+td�l (iatnus�wit�drawatw}:-or�
(14-Fsir-a.l+erout of years imnmddiat Iy{i€a o)in(£ Aornuuatioo-of parii ipaten-in�l+o
Prograno-the pa€Liu;ipntiit-tldltositdd-ovoids-with-Una Statt+Trc+asur«r-fur-aavas#atwii4 muter
paragtap4-(t),-(2)ctr.ldust-2-ddpiurits-wort+-loads-in
dash-l2-Woolf#+-pdrio+t,tkiiriitg-1#134-5-yawn-puriodr-eelstttd•.uiiat autratut-cid(ati,itdd-(nntinua
witulrawals}-10--sack+ I++;ash-IA':o--of-thd-tptat-aimal"t
doploutilk4notud-witadrawak) or
W4 - iia-pnarticipaut purelaiso l -110101K Ih usla, in-tiwiotal ;aggrdpiatu fa•.c:d anmuut of -rag
hour than -$4,040, -was ihdtar+gituak-pucefiaadr-oi ail+out#d-;roan-t#ta-Trda+:urerraml-lydhf
Lidsbonds-isniaturity- ocaater.
(b) Any participant who is certified by the State Treasurer under subsection (a) as
having met all of the requirements of that subsection shall:
(1) [lave quid refund" to Into by the. flitions Oepartmcat of Revenue in at +aunt .=dual
to the tax unposed under the ltc.al _KiiG 7t, `rat+sfcM ax Acte as ileus-cess#ierdaftar
aunna ddd, 2 u1sm tilt, 1 articile o'a purchase of a principal residence, and
(2) Have priority, over persons who are not so certified, in the Illinois Housing
Development Authority's program for acquiring and servicing residcotial mortgages
under Section 7.23 of the Illinois Rousing Development Act,-as--riew- er-haresa(ter
amdFaled.t
(c) At the request of the Participant, any Participant who is cerlifind by the State
Treasurer wider subsection (a) as having met all of the requirements of that subsection
may also he so certified by the State Treasurer to the treasurer of the county in whicli the
Participant has purchased a principal residence. Upon such certification, the county
irYasurer only pay rdfundl to the Participant an amount equal to the tax or may portion
thereof huposrd umhr';evtion fir -1031 of the tthaetti.s t+T�h 24,Yt5.atCt-nf-"An--Act to
roviia-Ind law in rotation Lin-a+unlia +rdvu arae-3tx D474, al, now -or slierroiftdr
aurand+xd, upon the ParLicipant's purchase of a principal resolvoce-
(Sourrr P A. it(; -77:1)
lei:{? Addal... Io lilt in. tadira tsl by und0h.._ dalnilnne by sldNnnxia
I far.+graph 11115 of this chapler, i Paragraph ;107.2:1 of this chaps r
S Chapter 120, 1 Ititq et scup- +Chapter 34, 11 5-1031
(Ch. fiV/2, rep. par. 1106) IS.ILA. ch. 671h, 111166 repealed)
Section 2. The Home Ownership Made Easy Act is amended by repealing Section 6.
Cerlified: Docunbcr 12, 1990
Effective: July 1, 14191
COUNTIES—FLOODPLAIN AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
PUBLIC ACT 86-1163
11 It, 3656
AN ACT --.big ntarmxater and fit dpb+h+ mnnngement, tionrid+ng nnnicd Art.
Be it enacted by the People of the Slate of Illinois, represented in the Gene+ -al
Asseinbt y.
Section 1. Tile Counties Code is amended by changing Sections 5-1012,5-1041, 5-1013,
and 5-1062 and adding Section 5-1062.1 as follows:
(Ch. 34, par. 5-1012) IS.H.A. ch. 34, 115-10121
§ 5-1012. Issuance of county. bonds. When the county board of any county deems it
necessary to issuecountyhands to enable [hem to perform any of the duties imposed
up ,n then by law, they may, by an order, Lit r eel of record, tip+ufying tile willanct of
bonds required, and the object for which they are to be issued, subunit to the It gal Voters
of tleir.lounty, at soy election, the tlue-:;tion of issuing such county heads, The county
board shall certify the question to the prober election official.., who shah submit tie
question at an election in accordance with the general election paw. The amount of the
bonds so issued shall nut exceed, including the then existing indebtedness of the county,
5-751. at pile value of such taxable property of such county, as ascertained by the
assessment for the State and county Lax for the preceding year or, until January t, 1983,
if greater, the sum that is produced by multiplying the county'. 1978 c-epiah t t :o,, e,svd
valuation by the debt limitation percentage in effect on January 1, 1970- Tile Proposition
shall he in substantially Lite following form: "For county bunts", or "Against c outety
bonds", and if a majority of the votes on that question shall be "For county bonds", such
cuuuty board may issue such hands in such denominations us tee county board inay
determine of not Ions than $25 each, payable respectively, in not less than one, nor more
than 20 years, with inteloA payable annually or scnti-annual#y, at flee rale of not more
than the greater of (i) the taaxinuou rate authoriae+l by Ow ;Lund Authorization Act,' as
auicuded at the; tinge of the nuking of the contract, or (it) 8> per annul_ 'Phis Section
shall not require submission to the voters of tine county of bond issues authorlaed Lo he
issued without such submission to the voter, under Section 5-1027 or S--1062 or under
Division and -Divii kinak fr33, 6 -ti, 6-8 or and 6-27 of this Code.2 - --�- With restwet to instrunictits for the payowic. of looney issued under this Section r r its
p acdoec=ssor either before, on, or after ilii e Lit =stive date of Public Act 181.6-4, it is and
always has Prean t+e vacation of the Gcnerad Asse-inhly (i) that the Omnitms Bend Acts'
are aml always have la -en supphnorotary grants of power to a_sue inslruau=lcts in
accordance arith the t)innibus hotel As[.,, regardless of any provision it( this Ae•I or "An
Act to revise it,, law in r i;dion to enmities", approved March :# t, 1874,' the clay apps ;2,
to be or to have been more restrictive than those Ants, lit) that the provisions of this
Section or its predecesaear arc nota Itmilation on the supphnti-wary awhority r; ,o rd L1.
the 0 tol,us (pond Acts, cud (in) that luslnuucnts iasucd under Illi, Svctw i ur its
predeec,sor within the sill iplemeutary authority rt -anted by the Ouu,ibus lo,o,l A,-tx ;--
I I
rccul iimalid bosun- of :uiy provia'al of this Act ur "Au Act tri revise the law ill pt:dloo Io
An+na.... 1., i..i ,,. I„ d".od 6r ..... 0... atoul . hr .oA., ul, 252:1
P.A. 86-1463 n611, CENERAL ASSEMBLY
......dies", approved March 31, 1874. that nuke r-ppe:ar to lir or a. nave ..ecu n.. m.
restrictive tits.. Iltose Arts.
(Source: P.A. 86-9112; 86-1028.)
1 Costae, 17 1 6RAl et se.) :+4ee , t 1 P, 1107.
a I aragral h ,a ad,11 it s.•,P , ti 61Nn ct , o + 1`nral, ,.phi ,t -q of this chapter_
6-8001 et sect. lir 6-27001 et self of this chap-
ter.
(Ch. 34, par. fr-1941) ISALA. rhe 34. 3 x10411
11 5-1011. Aialls, plats and snlalive din"- A county ho.F4 may pr€s"'the, by re"Jutio€t
or ordinance. reasonable rules and regulations goverlung the locata ul, withit and course of
ctrrets atter, highways and of flmtal1 Alcaitf sturmwat :r and 'sorra or floodwater rmudf
-
ci aeued`e and halms, attd the ;rretvistf€ti of v I ntCile gr ..tuts for sxlux+ds, public
libraries, part., or playgmundu, (n any malt, plat, or ; et itis ashm of any hl -k, tit( or no tat
or any part llaereof er any piece or pareel of hand, not being within ato. cityi village or
i€teorixtrated town iltcl-which rides and regulations may 11111101C -tch -as€ ll"bee
retttnrentetas welt rv�p£'£-t Irl water supply anti seviage ea£lhict€fki and lreatinent as titay be
establ€Shed by the t.nviromtn nt tl f rtatection Agi, ilea y and !+itch ret d it Able re luirefnents
With re"pert to flcnnt d a}n amt # rmwal r toan_f4a, o xtl as of ay It established b tit,
tiatiinty lnrxnwntter lvtaiaagtl €xt l:craoiuttic-e- Sall#>lk 1-ttia€Ire St tniii fi 1{ku2 iter this
3ci,£ # 3 n F€ real tt aT 1 rt•€Imreu(etsis ..1111 rs tc k ter stret=l €icanmge ana Burr cut, as
#i�ay ane ental}Tk�s�kt 1ky than 5ul€erhtteiidcatt of ighw iys of ttif= county anti wdis`e#i by
reSOt€!#!tt€t sAFalt lt$ dieiv#tt*d In lie the #nim#Stnin retltnranie tits stn the €nreP#'St of lie lH'al(tl,
safety, ,dine=ttitni and r+rnveoit#eat= #rf the Ituhhc lief tit, cirnkty; and n€cry prurirle lay
resolution #trot elle Fmflt, pial ur atfladivisit€n shall let su#€mit#ed leo the cntuaty hoard ur to
st}mc officer to lx det€i#;ualet# ley tba r€runty txiarJ fete 11#cir or his apprlival. The e{runty
taiirl shalt )rave a €Inatifik=e1 engiueir make cut eataitalc =Af illi, pr haihe exlmndtureit
t€eeessary tit ,twit, arty I..•rano leo tti},form w€tb Abe. standards of eunstri£eiiou estaltllshed
by tit, Imard pursuant to tide provision o '01 Sect#ern. 8=teh to=r+u#i whet weeks the
county board', approval of a map, plat or subdivisnm st .All poet a gloat and sufficient hdtntt
or oth#•r adequate sccltritty Willi the courtly £trrk, io ! tuaal =um sufficient to cover the
V riiirate o$ rxjtendib[res made by the e>stituatinl; r�tiftitccr_ 'rite howl or ..t1 er aetavpnt#e
security shalt be conditio€red also, fauldtit adherence to the rules olid iel,ndatid#is of die
countyl,uartl Irrouattlgated pursuant to like aulhorivatcuf granted to it try this Sectionor
b Seetan, �liNi2 of (his Guile,. and in such cases too such utalf, plat or subdivision shall
I stili#3ef1 to record €n t1ot proper connly or have any validity until it lids tetra'€t Se
approved
to tire case of a school thstriet whH•kt unclad -s 2 or €#.-Are luumcilsilities in whole or in
I art. if one of those mmfticilnklitles recctres or pro,s, lu receive public grounds tinder
this Section for settler[ or other public purpose., or .t coldributuan of cash m lieu thereof,
or to Combination of )will, its a result of a r t^,lir eua>nt hnitol,d on a developer of a
so itiv loon or ether laotda, tike, heard of n hall €bras -.ties or lit#.tr t tf t'+lald°atio#€, as the case
Billy be, of the school district shall be given all eplmrtufn}v to pariteidmte let the
determination of the amount of the donated grouo+l:i air cuolrilodout Will t##e nae to whist
the donation or £otdribuliou'hall he pal, its bercie,ifter prifi=i#ted_ fly .lannary t of every
year, a school district may present to the ,aunty board ;I plan (,I, tomato €r, if land, or
cash contributions in lieu thereor, ur a c rndaudlion of both, required by €h sclanul dustr(et
to citable it to Deform it. functions and detiee, in tile nalitt k=,'hod year. The plan shall he
supported by evehow'e wbirb €detnnestrt{s the sehf t tr re`s aa-[ reltnirelt cads, The
county board shall not adopt all ordimu€ce or resod€f#a r- i£ rile n a donate nt of land, or
cash eotArfhution in lieu thereof, or a combination of berth, for -chant or other public
purlumes, or to approve a proposed subdivision tr re ut,41visiiet Of land, with€tut first
holding a public hearing on the mailer to receivecuoime€Ata frou. interested persons.
The votmty board umy, by resolution. provide a I, budille off ' sufficient to rreindkursc
tike county for the cost., in-orn_d it. r eviewint, such teals plats amt subdivisions
sulinotted for approval to the e u€tits ho £r L The fees aulhortz 1 by this Section are to be
paid into tit, )ventral corporate bumf of telae eouttly by Ilan part_ desiring h} have the Plat
approved_
2521 Add€Plena in teal are indicated by un lioh e; deletions by -bilieaets
tarn Kt?uut.Ait SESSION V.A. 86-1163
No officer designated by a county hoard for the appro-1 of phd5 shall engal±, ue Iter
I smess of surveying, anti no map• pito or subdivisiuu shall he received for record or hill,
any validity which has benn prepared by or under it.,- dir,cliikll of su+-h plot of (icer
(Sour,:(, PA_ 86-9621 86-1028.)
ill, ;it. I.ar. 5r11113) I'SALA ch. :l9, 1
§ 5-1013 Wat{ r and Aaletary f =eitilit When, r;r a - "
nty or oull"-dii',
rer(akes tile tastatt itiun of water mins alutary saw r. , #ntns + if other fac£#ills for
sewers amt drains, the construction of any roadwityc or the oast Ration of arty traffe-
signals or outer traffic related improvements is, it can bta,u pre•cc # r+t to ill,- of l r -foal ,f if
prelbnitiaary or filial sithdividual or Itlat described it, stetia n h tilt} 1 it a relona
riry e+r
final pla#m d toter lrveloploeut It lint amt where, in tie opine"i of it ,<knf tt board ;ole
facilities, roadways lir imptovenients ma} be used for if. b"1'4a 1 pruin rev not is 11
subdivision or phumed unit devehfpmenat. and the w Ate' £€. -i#-s, ik it at -t -. ver.' 'Irade,,r
Other such fardities, or such roadways or improvements =are to be thethcale 1 t- life poi h,-
the ranut€ board may, by +runtract with tile Subdivider, lgr Ill reitnt t € e and t ,=a
reimburse the Sultdivtdcr for a Imrtie}o of the cost of much f o lities, r £otic tp-= at=l
improvements. =fit{ f'nalttf.. b,ar�l. ata} abo" by Contract Willi the uhd 4 # r, ag to
.share rite cost Of IRMOlhng reT ee f tetdt#les. Tile #+ia€iy 1 til c€€.tv an i#ln e -
recover the. costetf tit c: f+aci#dies trona fa es charge 1 to owner+ f pr.a+ert i » it#tier tit,
sull4alivisI-n or -ittt€+nra1'iiuil de--lolament wlicu and
as ',Allo'[ 1 Crat€f +£-'h iw >. n#alk
conirntt shall +[ascribe rite lwolwrty outside the subdivision er) mo : 1 _Ant€ 1 i-t€ttaaad
which may realm+ably he expec€crit it, benefit frittik the faeditt s, roadway,, r mato-"
manly which arerequirzd to he c£tedrifcted mtder the c,eldract €fol "boil la,rify ill'.amount Or propairtio€{ of the Cost of such facitilien. roadways k r £ t1 vee € i whtcli e'i ter
be ineurred priinardy for rhe F ellefit of that pnq,crty. Sufi
f a 01 triWt '11:111 Pflivii1c "l€ t
the county shall collect shat fees charg,-d til owners it( prop, Oy not within it sal -di; I
cion or plafnned unit develolonwrit al ;lily ti€ue prior to lite coa£oecli. o ill ilea d t . er( ttki lid
facilities, roadways or itnpr,tvefncnts by the respecllve livil-lie, of {.e t occur'.. `pie+'h
rnnlraet may provide for the, l..aymcnt to Ihre sot+lie-.£ter e f £ r vcnfat 1 -tku Reit of
intcre t ciin the amount espendi'd by the Nubdividtr In romplelinr o'h #.a dria r:. citta fy=+
anal improvcfnents, with said ilkterest to he calculated froln aafait after thr Jaw i4
completion of such farilitirs, roadways ata l improvelto,ots.
(Source: PA. BG 962)
(tom#r. 34. liar- 5,- 1062) [Sart A ah. 34, 1 (} 10621
Y ,}' 1.162. ,1.'torinwaaler matiagetitent (a) -rite l urtxt_se if khsa st•. to o is to )l ,r-
tnanagemeut and nntigati£#n of tete eff'Tts elf urbanization cf mor#nw It t drmaatte
uletropolittul counties locata 1 in the area sewed by the Northa as)cra iihn e; Plamnnt!
Cauttmissitan, lira{I reference= it) bounty to this Section shall oplity, only t .illi ro'utin'e.
This Section shall now
t apply to any amty with 1, Jnpulatum its -ve- of 1, meta}_ -, t4
as procr led io sat {;tine. t`) The punt -c of thi . It iii [. -IhAll 1. r If cd by
(it c+usoli,lating the #exi'tlog sFormwatcr m.an.}-ment fraue- est iifi+ .i stent+51.
countywide siracture.
(2) netting Snlettnutn slandanls for floridlilsin ;Amt st,o,o M— farm let;ow ni; anal
(3) pr,parieg a,oenlywale phut for tit- tnauar - -nt of slo£€swat,€'I' ff, inriudml•
the ma a g.-Inetit If natural Sed man matte dramageways. sm It corody w I'll, plan mat
iuc# rliorat . water}hed plains.
(b) A snalowatcr manaj f nuod planniuta cotontitt re shall he i -:#a# h l I by -atti c
board ri.5olutio€t Willi its eteiatership ..onoisting If erptal tion b er - of mly board ,nod
municipal rcyxesent atives frost{ Barb e ukLtt board 1a tract, ;11 1,1 siolt oihi r t a-€nl i d, .t>
,nay be dtternt}i _-1 by t#et,€atm#y ant# i£ nntcipat nn€€abers lb -ii -r, if ft. nooetk La
more th- it 6 -tont} board deitri t , t#o ouoly board of r by r b to , h, e l tit=- ot,
into tit lis #Iso f. art et of appolvimately t-Itual px I ut ti to b, a rl leo t } ka a. €
board di-'krivis for the pm posit of Jocroamog rcpie,e otat.'o+ oo the- ate+rmart+-r o .ofst,.+.
...ont planniog curunittce.
25.15
Addiilofn In teal aro Indicalad lir untie#tine; deletinna by afriaennb a�•t
Y.A. 86-1463 66th GENERAL ASSEMBLY
The county board members shall be appointed by the chairman of the county board,
Municipal members from each county board district or other represented area shall be
appointed by a majority vote of the mayors of those municipalities which have the
greatest percentage of their respective populations residing in such county board district
or other represented area. All municipal and county beard representatives shall be
entitled W a vote; ttw other members shall be nonvoting mer"hers, unless authorized to
vote by the unaninous consent of the municipal and county board representatives. A
municipality that is belled In more than one county may choose, at the time of formation
of the stormwater management planning committee and based on watershed boundaries,
to participate in the stormwater management planning program of either or both of the
counties Subcommittees of the stormwater mane ement Iain n cornmittee pray be
estate€€shed to serve a portion o t e coin or a mien r raasin tFat has shoe tmilar
stormwatee man! eemme tjs f neer o _ e car t�amal#ee .2,11"'.13.a c ntr an�vice
efiair one ? wTtom ahalC e a c tl# unty retireaentauve miT one a mm�t i ?aE re aresentattve.
The principal duties of the committee shall be to develop a stormwater management
li€art for presentation to and approval by the county board, and to direct the plan's
implementation and revision. The committee may retain eo g sneering, )ell and financial
advisors and ins ton pSL.Rnne� c committee she meet at least quartorly anti spial!
6oiT at �t onelee utile meeting during the preparation of the plan and prior to il_v
submittal to the county board.
(e) In the preparation of a stormwater management pian, a county stormwater manage-
ment planning committee shall coordinate the planning process with each adjoining county
to ensure that recommended stormwater projects will have no significant impact on the
levels or flows of atorminaters in inter -county watersheds or on the capacity of existing
and planned atnrmwater retention facilities. An ad+opted 'stormwater management plan
shall identify steps taken by the county to coordeatte tote development of plan recammem
dations with adjoining counties.
(d) Before the stormwater management planning committee recotmnends to the county
board a stormwater management plan for the county or a portion thereof, it shall submit
such plan to the Department of Transportation, Division of Water Resources, to the
Department of (Conservation, and to the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission, for
review and recommendations. The Departments and the Commission, in reviewing such
plan, shall consider such factors as impacts ort tine levels or flows in rivers and streams
and the cumulative effects of stormwater discharges on flood levels. The Department of
Tr��alem�o�rtatttm Division of Water R€sources, shall detenuine whet ler the�ata,�nr
ordinanct.s enac0to im epi mend ifte jlari coin flies with the -re ttiret"encs of subset#con
s Taat ininmilt to exceed 60 days, the review comments an recommen atsuos
n submitted to the stormwater management planning committee for consideration.
Any amendments to such plan shall be submitted to Lite Departments and the Commission
for review.
(e) Prior to recommending such plan to the county Intern, the storniteater management
planning committee shall hold at least one public hearing theretr" and shall afford
Interested persons an opportunity to be heard. The hearing shall be hcht in the county
seat. Notice of the bearing shall be published at least once no less than 15 days it,
advance thereof in a newspaper of general circulation pub}sept-in the Bounty, Such
notice shall state the time and place of the hearing and the place where copies of thin
proposed plan will he accessible for examination by interest,:vt parties. If an affected
municipality having a stormwater tomiagement plan adopted by ortoont-e wishes to
protest the propleont county phot provisions, it shad apgtcar at the hearing, slid submit in
writing specific proposals to the stormwater management planning committee. After
consideration of the matters raised at the hearing, the committee may amend or approve
the plan and recommend it to the county board for adoption.
The county board may enact the proposed plan by ordinance. If the proposals for
modification of the plan made by an affected municipality having a stonnwater manage-
ment plan are not included in the proposed county plan, and the municipality affected by
the plan opposes adoption of the county pian by resolution of its corporate authorities,
approval of the county plan shall require an affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the
1990 REGULAR SESSION P.A. 86-1463
county board members present and voting. If the County board willies to .nand the
county plan, it shell submit in writing specific proposals to the stortuwatt r ntaoageowot
planning committee. If the proposals are not approval by the ammittree or are opl sed
by resolution of tate corporate authorities of are affected tnuna ile lily heti ilig a n otocipaI
stormwater management plan, amendment of the plan shall relpen, as afftiniativc vole if
at least two-thirds of the county hoard members present and inning.
(q The county board map prescribe by ordinuoce reasonable rules aro€ n gelatious for
floodplain management mol for governing the location, width, course and release rate of
all stormwaler runoff channels, streams and basins in the county, in av o,daur, with tine
adopted stormwater management plan. These rules and r-�[,tlatz et:s shall at t mini€cult,
meet the standards for flood datamamma main[ e tabltsh v1 li}ate Iihn i, 11 It l intent of
wan ortation, ptiyts on 7 !leer ltcstrurce_, , ssl !It rerlmrc rn itstif the-I"d -nal
Fit—ergency a�nai� anent gr*nc o arU tzatrcn in the Kati and H'ltiod €murance 1'r0
ram. -- ra -
(g) In acrordauce with, and if rect nuuended in, the adopted storutwator m;utagenu=nt
Llan, the county board may adopt a schedule of such fees as may be accessary to mitigate
the effects of increased stormwater too iff resulting from new hividopment Sucii fens
shall not exceed the cost of satisfying tide onsite stormwater retention or detention
requirements of the adopted stormwater management plan. Thr fees shall be used it,
finance activities undertaken by the county or its included numicipalities to mitigate the
effects of urban stormwater runoff by providing regional stormwater rulention or
detention facilities, as identified in the county plan. All such fees eollecled by the county
shall be held in a separate fund, and shall be expended only in the watecahed within "Legh
they were collected.
(h) For the purpose of implementing this Section and for the Acvelttpmcul, desiicrn,
planning, construction, operation and maintenance of stormwater facilitwt provided for in
the stormwater management Ilion, a cotmty Iroard which has eatablisbrd a stornticat—
management phameng committee pursitant to this Section utas cause ata annual lax of out
to exceed 4.20% of the value, as equalized or assessed by Lite Departnu nt or Revenue, of
all taxable property in the county, it, lie levied open all the taxable prole,cly in such
county. Such tax shall lie in addition w all other taxes authorised by taw to he levied aotl
collected in such county sod shall be in addition to the niaxitnuin tax mile, tathorixt=_l by
law for general county purposes_ Tide 0.20A- limitation prorsded in ties Sot -tion Wady le
Increased or decreased by referendum In aceurdance with the proveolot. cif Se iioa 162ar of
the Revenue Act of 1939, as amended.'
Any revenues generated ;Is a result of ownership or operation of facilities for €loll
acquired with Ute tax funs collected pursuant to thin, subsection (h) Miall he held in a
separate fund and be used either to abate loch property tax or for implementing this
Section.
However, iudcss at least part of tine comate has been its-luraat after July 1, 1986 be
presidential proclamation to be a disaster area as a resuh, of flooding, the tax authorized
by this subsection (h) shall not be levied until the question of its adoptiut, t,ilhur for a
specified) lurid or indefinitely, hoe been submitted to the viectora thereof and approved
by a majority of obeli rating on the question_ This question nay le- solouiUrd at any
election held in the county aft --r the adoption of a resolututn by tilt, couell Ineird
providing for the submission of the question to the electors of the county. Tfre ronoty
board shall certify the resolution and proposition to the proper election official,, who shall
submit the propositimt at ;In etertinn at aecardanec with the general elation law. If a
majority of the vobf,s cast art the question is in favor of that levy elf sunt tax, it oc,y
thereafter be levied is such, county for it"! specific I penod or notuholt, Iv ds pntvid-I is
the proposition. The question shall be put in substantially the following form
Shall an annual tax be levied for stormwater management YEs
purposes (for a period of not noore than ....... years) at a -- _ -
rate not exceeding .. _% of tine equalized assessed-valoe
of tine taxable property of ,.._.._... County? No
2526 Additions In lest us Indkalsd by antitrust; da#eflons by shikeaase J Adiiileos in Leet six Indicated by endattina; details.. by Nttktroet. 2527
N.A. 86-1463 86111 GENERAI, ASSE51111.Y
it) Upnn it.,, creation and itnp#enxnlat#on rf 1, €=t€€nd t- slonnwa#€ r m €aagc to p4`tn. the
.,Only maypreiifion the circuit court to hs lvta any or all drainage district, created
pnrtmmrt to fileIlline € l}rainaLc t ode' or I rci.ecssur Acts who-lt are hatted entirely
within the area of Che cont€ty covered by Lite Plan,
llowctvcr, nay a,tive drainago ch urict imidetneoliul• a ph... which I. consiaalcnt with and
at least as stringent .is tile nwn
e county storater a€tmgeolent Platt may pet€tion the
sturaswater €tianagenaeat planning Committee fur exccpliutt from d#saolulaim Ulaori filing
of tm
he Petition, the committee shall :set a date for hearing not less than 2 wicks, a€ir more
Ilnatt 4 weeks, f€inn the filing thercofa andfile cateiinatri•. shall give at )cast alta week`s
notice of such hearing it, one or €lore newspaper; of general circulation within tile
thAtirt, slid at addition ;:hail cause a rally of the € tuir. to be personally €erved upon och
of file trustees of the district_ AL such hearing, the c=ommittee shall hear the district's
petiGoti and allow the district trustees and any interested parties alt Opportunity to
t€recent oral aced written evidence. 9'he committee shall render its elect sacs upon fie
Inatitivn for exception front dissolution hastaf upnit Lite best interests of the r si€leafs of
the district. In the event that such excelition is riot allowed, Use district €nay file a
petition within 30 days of such decision with the circuit court. In such cage, the notice
amp hearing requirements for the court shall be the sante as herein provided for file
committee, The court shall likewise render its decision of whether to dissolve file district
hoard upon file beat interests of residents of the district. -.
111 dissolutitna of any drainage district shall not affect the Obligation of tiny bonds
issued or contracts entered into by such district neer Invalidate the levy, extension or
collection of ally taxes or special assessments upon the property in the fotncer drainage
district_ Alt property and obligations of file fanner (Irat(€age di trset hall fie assumed
ane( nesn;a),ed by the county, still the debid of file firmer drainagi, district shall be
discharged as suaen as practicable -
If a drainage district hes Daly partly within a comity which adopts a county stormwater
ueana"'Ineap plan, the county may petition the circuit court to disconnect from the
drnuap;e district that )nation of the district which lies within such county_ The property,
,If the draloage district within the dksconaec'te'd area shall be usaarej and mtotaged fey
the county. 'Vile county shall also assume a. fortiori If the drainage e diFtrict=3 debt at the
lime of based an flee porlioo of the value if the ta.aile property of tine
drainage d+etrict which is located within the area being disconnected.
The operatinns of any drainage district which contiones to exist in o county that has
adopted a stormwater mstnagement plan in accordance with this Section, shall be in
accordance with the adcipt€ll plan.
(j) Any county which lots altupled'It county stormwater ntanagemcnt plan "tater this
Secttmn may, after 10 slays written notice ft) file owner or Occupant, enter upon atsy Istnls
or waders within the county for file purpose of inspecting starmwaLer facilities or euusa€g
the removal of any obstruction to ;in affecte=d watercourse- The county %hail he
r£spote ible for any damages occasioned thereby.
(k) Upon petition of the municipality, and leased aril a fooling if the taortawater
nianai;
P.A. 811-1463 SGth GENERAL ASSEMBLY
facilitt The committee aha## #tlenUfy in an annual Luhlis#ted r et siep4 la< m t>y the
cotnnntee -[a r tnat�tlie c v oytnent- 0 khan recot itnel ii iris wttlt_ nal o#€t 1s
_
ec mai#w he commtttt}e aha## also tthh h a eoare ttastetl stormwater rlor.ument of all
t tnrtty it, I_a! Cook County area .and geed apron atormwater d:uutmy; �tanslarU.
t) The stortowalar nemabt ni tit- platmmg committee shall submit the
watel'Shed fl us to lb, t!€. +arttneut. ttf 7 r mal ertxt n Ilivisuun f K herr I 5 mrees lei
tl r licpartment e C ma rvaiton trot #€r the Northca t rm#Knots Planning tttttial umnissi ai
far review and rrcatnmen€ aGun. t }e artnsents Ind t#te t mnusston to rettestt}tf,
tI€e rlav alt tli ter. n�i er tlsose actors as itnpatt un th€ #eve] d flouts in the rivers a€id
streanta and the counts na, eeffects m starmwat r discharges oil (laud reels 77`"e
revieu_eomaxnt vu<t recotumen at ons slaall be submittee to the watersba roUratCs
fur en€ Sntlzrtt303t-
(t Thi stereo to €. maea.abvn€e€tt. planning_counnitt, n� rectommcnd rules awl
!'-matt ns io the watershed councils governing lite location width, oottrs rt;d cert :-tsv
rates 'nfull it rrt iw r runoff �inels, streams an utas (hc caunt}�
(_7 The Northwest fdurdcipal Conference the South Suburban Ma =ors and Managers
gers
..i___ L...._
Assnsiatma and W West C;gutcal un€ctpa f;onferenec s a## be restna€,sable for rite
caiortli€ration of flits Section.
(Ch. 85, rep. par. 2112) [S.H.A. ch. 85, 62112 repealed)
Section 2. Section 12 of the Open Space Lands Acquisition and Development Act,
known as the Flomll lain Land and Property Acquisition Law, is repealed.
Section 3. This Act takes effect upon becoming law. [S.HA. ch. 34, 15-1012 note]
t;crtificit December 12, I!N90
Effcoive. Dace :ober 12, 1990
HEALTH CARE FACILITIES—KOSHER KITCHEN AND FOOD SERVICE
PUBLIC ACT 86-146,1
MR. R. 3755
AN ACT to amend Tlw Iltlnois Public Aid rode by adding Section
Be it courted by the People of the Stale of 111iuuis, represented in the General
Assembly:
Section 1, The Illinois Public Aid Code is amended by adding Section fr5.5a as follows:
((',h. 23, new par- fr5.5a) IS,II.A. ch. 23, 11 5-5.5al
5-5.5a. Kosl€er kitchen and food :service.
25:141 Additions In text ars Indicated by andedine; deletions by slrlMeeuN
1990 REGULAR SESSION P.A, 86-1-165
fle) The I)upartmt at ~hall by rule determine how a fox facil€ y with a fully k ~her kitchen
e - -
nx1 d service aro t dciermiz,cd to bt ttigible and #y for tI e rate a ciuw€odatiou
� _ _
�}iCliti #It §nl 'iimti (,t)<
Certified, lo-iiihe 12, V00
Elffeali-, J,dy t, 1991
MOTOR VEll ICLES—SCI1001, BUS DRIVERS—IMPLIED CONSENT
PLARLIC ACT 86-1465
11-I1. 4159
AN At7 to amend The Illinois Vehicle Code by chnnxing Sections ("1161 rad f-516
Be it courted by Ili People of the State of Illinois, represented i,, the Grnr:nt
Assembly:
Section 1. The 11huoir Vehicle Code is anaeniled by changing Sections G-1061 mid
G-516 ;is follows:
((:h. 95'Iq par, G-106 1) 1S.R.A. c11. 95'Js, it 6-106.11
§ 6-106.1. School bus driver permit.
(a) Upon proper application and payment of the required fee in the aniuunt of $-1,
payable to the Regional Superintendent in the county in which application is made, to be
added to that Superintendent's budget and used expressly for the refresher courses for
school bus operators, a school bus driver permit shall he issued, as prescribed by the State
Superintendent of Education, by the Regional Superintendent to each aplelic;nI, who meets
the following requirements:
1. is 21 years of age or older;
2. has a valid and properly classified driver's license issued by the Secretary oi'
State;
:1- has held a valid driver's license, which has not beea revoked or suspended for on,-
or
neor more traffic violations, for 3 years immediately prior to the'date of application;
A. has successfully passed a written test, administered by the Secretary of State, am
school bus operation, school bus safety unit special traffic laws reiatiug to --hool buses
as the State Superintendent of Education prescribes, and that a review of Tach
applicant's driving habits wit) be completed by the Secretary of State at the time the
written test is given, and when the results of this review indicate that the applicant is
not in compliance with paragraphs 9 and 10 of this Section, there will exist imminent
cause for failure of the written test;
5. has demonstrated ability to exercise reasonable care in the III rahon of school
bases in accordance with such standards as the State Superintendent of Education
prescribes;
6. dennuetrutes physical fitness to operate school h€€sen by Sol atting the results
of a medical examination, including tesla for drug and-, Itiolutl use for each applicant net
subject to such besting pursuant to federal law, conducted by a licensed physician
within 90 days of the date of application according to standards pro€nulgated by the
State Superintendent of Education;
7. has not made a false statement or knowingly concealed it maleaial fact in any
applicaUon for permit;
8. has enrolled in nn initial classroom course, including first aid procedures, in
school bus driver safety as prescribed by the State Superintendent of Education, to be
completed within 45 school days; and after satisfactory completion of said initial course
an annual refresher course; such courses and the agency or orgaoiaation cunt urging
Additions 1. lest sot indicated by nada ibite deletions by sbilt—U 251;11
NwMC/caf
4/1/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF A COUNTYWIDE FLOOD
AND STORMWATER MITIGATION EFFORT
WHEREAS, flooding and stormwater runoff has become a serious County
County problem that can threaten both citizens and property; and
WHEREAS, many mitigation efforts have been undertaken by individual
jurisdictions, but it remains that flooding and stormwater runoff
is a regional problem requiring a regional response; and
WHEREAS, the Illinois Legislature, in passing Public Act 84-1463,
authorized Cook County municipalities and the County of Cook to
forge an alliance for the purpose of improving flood and stormwater
control efforts; and
WHEREAS, this alliance shall be known as the Cook County Stormwater
Management Planning Committee; and
WHEREAS, the success of this alliance depends upon the cooperation
and commitment of the County and the municipalities comprising the
Cook County Stormwater Management Planning Committee.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois, hereby expressed support for the Cook County Stormwater
Management Planning Committee and its charge to develop and
coordinate stormwater management plans and regulations within each
of the Cook County watersheds and ensure that stormwater management
projects proposed for Cook County have no significant adverse
impact on neighboring jurisdictions.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
0
CAF/
3/26/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE
REFERENDUM QUESTION ON THE BALLOT OF THE
PRIMARY ELECTION HELD MARCH 17 1990
WHEREAS, the Primary Election was held on Tuesday, March 17, 1992,
which contained the following referendum question for the Village
of Mount Prospect:
" Shall the Village of Mount Prospect, in cooperation with the
City of Prospect Heights, purchase, maintain and operate the
water and sewer system now owned by the Citizens Utilities
Company, and located within the incorporated portions of
Wheeling Township, said purchase to be paid for by charges
against those persons and entities serviced by said water and
sewer system?"
and
WHEREAS, the local Canvassing Board has conducted the official
canvass and presented the results; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby declare the results of the March 17, 1992,
election for said referendum question.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That pursuant to the Consolidated Election Laws of
the State of Illinois, the Primary Election was held on Tuesday,
March 17, 1992.
SECTION TWO: That an official canvas was conducted by the Local
Canvassing Board for the Referendum Question of Village of Mount
Prospect declaring 2,815 ballots were cast as follows:
Yes 1,028
No 1,787
SECTION THREE: That inasmuch as the Referendum Question pertaining
to the construction of new Public Safety Building received greatest V
number of votes negative votes, it is declared that this Question
is failed.
SECTION FOUR:, That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to forward
a certified copy of this Resolution to the Cook County Clerk
Election Department and the State Board of Election Commissioners,
as provided by law.
SECTION FIVE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this 7th day of April, 1992.
ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
March 17, 1992 Referendum Question
"Shall the Village of Mount Prospect, in cooperation with the City of Prospect
Heights, purchase, maintain and operate the water and sewer system now owned by
the Citizens Utilities Company, and located within the incorporated portions of
Wheeling Township, said purchase to he paid for by charges against those persons
and entities serviced by said water and sewer system?"
PRECINCT NO. YES NO
12 124 186
54 133 184
56
97
183
59
57
61
65
112
160
71
118
204
75
92
155
81
37
88
84
33
62
DS
90
187
95 63 175
121
Totals; 1,028 1,787
-
,.
�T-7
X's� - nn
� ��
o
'`
= �� ���/TI
Accepted by canvassing board, Village of Mount Prospect
—~c;
BH/caf
3/27/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 9.115 OF CHAPTER 9
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 9.115.B entitled "Commercial Use of
Sidewalk Space, Special Permit" of Chapter 9 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended in its
entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 9.115.B of Chapter 9
shall be and read as follows:
B. Under no circumstances shall the use of a public sidewalk
for restaurant purposes reduce the portion of the
sidewalk left open for pedestrian travel to less than
four feet (41). Further, in order to prevent the
restaurant space from encroaching in front of another
merchants establishment, the boundaries of the outdoor
space shall not extend laterally beyond the sidewalls of
the interior space at the point where the sidewalls meet
the sidewalk."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
21-�
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
BH/caf
4/l/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 23
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNTPROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 23.101 entitled "Disorderly Conduct" of
Chapter 23 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by adding thereto paragraph 16; so that
hereinafter said Section 23.101 shall include the following:
16. Is in possession of an alcoholic beverage in a public
street or other public place; unless the alcoholic
beverage is in its original container with the seal
unbroken or unless the possession is on the premises of
an establishment holding a valid Village of Mount
Prospect liquor license. For the purpose of this
subsection, a public place shall include, but not be
limited to, all Village streets, Village owned parking
facilities, all parking lots and common areas serving
commercial establishments and all parking areas and
common areas serving multi -family residential structures
containing four or more dwelling units, provided that
this prohibition shall apply to such multi -family common
areas only if the owner, mananger, or owners association
has stated, in writing, that it is the intention of the
ownership of such owner of common area that the
prohibition be applied. The written statement may
reserve the right of management to give one day permits
for resdients or tenants to hold social gatherings in a
common area."
SEC ION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
/I
Village Clerk
BH/caf
3/26/92
ORDINANCE NO.�
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVIII OF CHAPTER 23
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 23.1805 entitled "Tenant Obligations"
of Chapter 23 of the Villag;m- Code of Mount Prospect, as amended,
is hereby further amended by adding thereto paragraph I'Ll'; so that
hereinafter said Section 23.1805 shall include the following:
L. Not be in possession of any alcoholic beverage in a public
street or other public place unless the alcoholic beverage is
in its original container with the seal unbroken. For the
purpose of this subsection, a public place shall include, but
not be limited to, all Village streets and all parking areas
and common areas serving multi -family residential structures
containing four or more dwelling units, provided that this
prohibition shall apply to such multi -family common areas only
if the owner, mananger, or owners association has stated, in
writing, that it is the intention of the ownership of such
owner of common area that the prohibition be applied. The
written statement may reserve the right of management to give
one day permits for resdients or tenants to hold social
gatherings in a common area."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
0
CAF/
4/1//92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE X OF CHAPTER 4
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 4.1001 entitled "Establishment" of
Chapter 4 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said
Section 4.1001 of Chapter 4 shall be and read as follows:
"Sec. 4.1001. Establishment. In order to prevent, minimize,
repair and alleviate injury of damage resulting from
disaster caused by enemy attach, sabotage or other hostile action,
or from natural or man-made disaster, in accordance with "The
Illinois Emergency Services and Disaster Act of 197511, there is
hereby established a Department of Emergency Services and Disaster
(ESDA), which shall be under the jurisdiction and control of the
Village Manager, who shall have and the title and responsibility
of IIESDA Director".
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
0
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Directof' "
DATE: April 3, 1992
SUBJECT: Proposed Water and Sewer Rate Increase
In a March 1991 report on Water Fund expenditures and rates covering the past five years
and projections of needs for the next five years, the conclusion was reached that the Village
would need to increase water rates approximately 5% a year during this period. The report
showed that the Water Fund has a healthy fund balance and that the balance would be used
to fund major projects as well as to moderate future rate increases. If modest increases are
not implemented on an annual basis, future rate increases would need to be much greater
than the amounts proposed.
The projections in the 1991 report are still valid, and anticipated the 1991-1992 draw down
of fund balance of $265,600 and an expected $1.80,200 in 1992-1993. Additionally, the
funding of the renovation of the downtown water tank from the existing fund balance was
anticipated when future rate increases were developed. Accordingly, a combined water and
sewer rate increase of $.13 per 1,000 gallons was included in the 1992-1993 budget. The
current rate is $2.62 per 1,000 gallons and with the increase the new rate will be $2.75 per
1,000 gallons.
The attached ordinance provides for this increase and will be for all water used after
April 30, 1992 and will actually appear for the first time on the bills dated June 30, 1992.
DCJ/sm
0
SZ,0$ joaaaqq uoTqaod ao paLmsuoo
J94vm 90 SUOTTR2 000'T lad
:p9LIsTuan3 si ao-rAjas lamas tl-D-rqm oq paumsuoo j9qvm go qunome
aqq uodn pasvq aqua lamas 2UTMOTIo3 aqa .Cud IILqs 'sadid ao sui-ew
la4VM PUP lamas 92UJITA 9qj qjTM UOII09UUOO 439ITPUT 10 109aTp P
Tu'Auq 92PTITA aqq 90 sITmTT aqvaodaoo aqa apTsIno sa9sn lamas TTV `Z
gvz$ 2TUn 2UITTGmP lad qauom led
:jo aqua JPTJ
e Xud jTv7qs 'sedid ao suirm jaipm a2vjTTA aqi 'qaTm aou puv sad -Ed ao
SUTVW lamas a9vTTTA aql TqaTM UOTIDaUUOD :13aJTPUT ao :j0aJTP V 2UTAVq
92PTTTA aqq 90 s4TwTT aiviodaoo aiqq uTqqTm saasn lamas a2vTTTA TTV 'Z
SZ,0 909Jaqq u0Tqjod ao paumsuoo
Je4vm 90 SUOTTP2 000'T lad
:paqsTuang ST 901A -19s lamas q3TIAm Oq PaumsUO0 a93vm 90 lunOulv aqq
uodn paspq 'aqua lamas 2uTmOTTOJ aqa Kvd TTLiqs sad -Ed ao suivw aaivm
PUP lamas 99PTTTA aqi qqTm uOTIOG=00 qOaJTPuT JO 409JTP V SuTAipq
'92VTTTA aqq 90 s2TMTI alvaodioo aqa uT43Tm siasn lamas 92VTTIA TIV 'I
: aqu-d -D
gmoTToj sp ppea oa Z -i705 -ZZ uoTqoaS go D uo-EloasqnS 2uipuaum 6q (q)
00*0 3OeJ9qq UOTqaod ao pamnsuoo
SUOTTP2 000'T qova joj aqp-d 19jum
:OIVJ 2ulmOTTO3 aqa Kpd
TTvqs sadid ao SUTVW J91PM 02VTTTA qjTM U0Tj3aUU00 339ITPUT JO 409JTP
v 2UTAuq 92L-ITTA 9q4 30 SITWIT aivaodioD aqq apTsino siasn 92u-Lj-fA IIV q
09'z$ joaaaqq uoTliod ao pawnsuoo
lairm go SUOTIV2 OOO'T q0va loa 9jr-d 193vm
:aqua
2uTMOTT09 aqq Xvd TTPqs sad -rd ao SUTUIU J94um 92UTITA qITM UOT409UU00
209ITPUT 10 :139JTP V 2U-1AVtj '92PITTA 9LI:3 uTq2Tm siasn 92VTTIA TTV 'V
SMOTTOJ SP PPea Oq Z'i709'ZZ UOT409S go q puv V suo-EloasqnS 2uipuauiv 6q
(v)
apoD a2vjjTA aqq go ZZ ;caqdeqD go ,sa3vu Put' SJa:I@N,, PalgTW9 A 9IT2.TV :HNO NOUDES
:SIONiqqi 'AINaOD MOOD 'IDsasolad INnow
aO 39VTIIA SHI aO SRUSffldl JO QNVO9 aNV IKKISgNa alll 7,q CgNIVG'dO 11 39
SIONIIII 'IDUSOUd LNfIOK AO HGOD H0VTIIA
3HI AO ZZ XHICIVHD ao ,SHIV)I (INV SU2112K.
aariiiINZ A TIDII)TV aNHKV 01 3DNVNI(I2i0 KV
ON HDNVNIaUO
4, All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having
a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer mains or
pipes, but not with Village water mains or pipes, shall pay a flat
rate of:
Per month per dwelling unit $2.25
SECTION TWO: The water and sewer rates established by Section One of this Ordinance
shall be effective for water used subsequent to April 30, 1992.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect May 1, 1992
following its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in accordance with
law.
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1 1992.
AYES:
NAYS:
W -335R."
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Village President
CAF/
4/3//92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XXXIV OF CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 4.1001.B of Chapter 11 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended in
its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 11.3505.B of Chapter
11 shall be and read as follows:
B. Any Class II establishment may receive up to a maximum of four
(4) inspections and/or reinspections per year without
additional charge. Upon the fifth (5th) inspection and/or
reinspection and every inspection and/or reinspection
thereafter, as deemed necessary by the Department of
Inspection Services, the licensee shall pay an additional
inspection service charge of either Fifty Dollars ($50.00) or
one quarter (1/4) of the annual business license fee
established in subsection A of Section 11.3405, whichever is
greater. 11
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
MOSS AND BLOOMBERG, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
BARRY L. MOSS
STEVEN P. BLOOMBERG
GEORGE A. MARCHETTI
STUART 0. GORDON
DAVID J. FREEMAN
NORMA J. GUESS
MICHAEL E. ROBLE
March 23, 1992
John Dixon
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Re: NTN Bearing Corporation of America ("NTN")
1600 E. Bishop Court
Sign 21-91
Dear John:
305 WEST BRIARCLIFF ROAD
P.O. BOX 1158
BOLINGBROOK, ILLINOIS 60440-0858
TELEPHONE (708) 759-0800
TELECOPIER (708) 759-8604
In my letter of October 3, 1991, a copy of which is enclosed,
NTNIE; legal position is set forth as to its right to install two
free-standing signs on the berm within its property. NTN acquired its
present building and made its decision to re -locate its North American
headquarters with the signs being a primary concern as to the identi-
fication of the building.
NTN agreed to make modifications to the two free-standing signs by
lowering its signs by 4.2 feet in height and changing the sign base
and color. This change was intended to bring the signs closer in size
to the profile of the typical identification signs in the Kensington
Business Center while also being sensitive to the needs of the
residents in the surrounding area. NTN also voluntarily has put
a timer on the signs making sure that they are turned off in the late
evening.
NTN is requesting that the Village Board reconsider its vote as to
the ratification as to the "field change". However, if the Village
Board does not wish to reconsider its position, NTN Will Stand on its
legal right to maintain the current signs at their present locations.
Sincerely,
14OSS ANP-V,0Df6ER(3j LTD.
P. Bl
SPB:bk
cc: 'id Clements
cc: Everett "Buzz" Hill
John Fulton Dixon
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mt. Prospect, IL 60506
Re: NTN Bearing Corporation of America
Dear John:
As I indicated at our meeting on September 27, 1991, 1 have been
retained by NTN Bearing Corporation of America ("NTN") to represent its
interest as to the dispute concerning two free-standing signs located
on its property at 1600 Bishop Court, mt. Prospect, Illinois.
NTN negotiated the acquisition of the office building within the
Kensington Business Park in August, 1990, while also contracting with
Federal Sign to both design the signs for their business and to obtain
a permit from the Village of Mt. Prospect. It is my understanding that
Charles Pasco from Federal Sign spoke with Ken Fritz in August and
September, 1990, and inquired as to whether ground -mounted signs would
be permitted based upon a permit application. it is my understanding
that Mr. Fritz advised that the permit for the ground -mounted signs
would be allowed for NTN's property, and NTN then entered into a
contract with Opus for the purchase of the building. I understand
there was a temporary sign located at the corner of Kensington and Wolf
Road that was shared by Coldwell Bank and by Opus and that the permit
for this sign was extended several times. it is my further understand-
ing that Ken Fritz, in a letter of April 8, 1991, stated to Joe Mikes
from Opus that before any permanent signs would be erected on the berm
of the property, the temporary signs must be removed. Ken Fritz also
stated he wanted to be in a position to issue a permit for permanent
signs.
In the first week of March, 1991, the permit application for the NTN
signs was submitted to the Village of Mt. prospect by Chuck Pasco of
Federal Signs. This permit was accepted with a drawing of the proposed
signs and calculations as to location. The wind -load calculations were
also submitted to the Village in March, 1991. In a telephone conversa-
tion with Ken Fritz on April 3, 1991, Mr. Fritz told Mr. Fendrick of
Federal Sign that once the temporary signs were removed, the permit
would be issued for the permanent signs based upon the drawings sub-
mitted. Mr. Fendrick was also advised by Bill Amundson from the
MOSS AND BLOOMBERG, LTD.
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
BARRY L. MOSS
STEVEN P. BLOOMBERG
305 WEST BRIARCLIFF ROAD
GEORGE A. MARCHETTI
P 0. BOX I iss
BOLINGBROOK ILLINOIS 60440-W58
STUART D. GORDON
TELEPHONE (708) 759-0800
TELECOPIER (708) 759-SS04
DAVID J. FREEMAN
NORMA J. GUESS
MICHAEL E. ROBLE
October 3, 1991
John Fulton Dixon
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mt. Prospect, IL 60506
Re: NTN Bearing Corporation of America
Dear John:
As I indicated at our meeting on September 27, 1991, 1 have been
retained by NTN Bearing Corporation of America ("NTN") to represent its
interest as to the dispute concerning two free-standing signs located
on its property at 1600 Bishop Court, mt. Prospect, Illinois.
NTN negotiated the acquisition of the office building within the
Kensington Business Park in August, 1990, while also contracting with
Federal Sign to both design the signs for their business and to obtain
a permit from the Village of Mt. Prospect. It is my understanding that
Charles Pasco from Federal Sign spoke with Ken Fritz in August and
September, 1990, and inquired as to whether ground -mounted signs would
be permitted based upon a permit application. it is my understanding
that Mr. Fritz advised that the permit for the ground -mounted signs
would be allowed for NTN's property, and NTN then entered into a
contract with Opus for the purchase of the building. I understand
there was a temporary sign located at the corner of Kensington and Wolf
Road that was shared by Coldwell Bank and by Opus and that the permit
for this sign was extended several times. it is my further understand-
ing that Ken Fritz, in a letter of April 8, 1991, stated to Joe Mikes
from Opus that before any permanent signs would be erected on the berm
of the property, the temporary signs must be removed. Ken Fritz also
stated he wanted to be in a position to issue a permit for permanent
signs.
In the first week of March, 1991, the permit application for the NTN
signs was submitted to the Village of Mt. prospect by Chuck Pasco of
Federal Signs. This permit was accepted with a drawing of the proposed
signs and calculations as to location. The wind -load calculations were
also submitted to the Village in March, 1991. In a telephone conversa-
tion with Ken Fritz on April 3, 1991, Mr. Fritz told Mr. Fendrick of
Federal Sign that once the temporary signs were removed, the permit
would be issued for the permanent signs based upon the drawings sub-
mitted. Mr. Fendrick was also advised by Bill Amundson from the
John Fulton Dixon
October 3, 1991
Page 2
Village Building Department that a permit for the signs was approved
and that the permit could be picked up upon payment of the fee.
I understand that the two signs were installed without payment of the
permit fee on April 15, 1991 and that Federal Sign, after being advised
that the permit fee was not paid, attempted to pay the fee and pick up
the permit on April 25, 1991. The permit was not given to NTN on this
date even after payment of the permit fee was tendered.
David Clements, the Director of Planning and Zoning, has stated that
the free-standing signs currently erected on the berm are in violation
of the planned unit development site plan. Further, Mr. Clements
advised NTN in his letter of August 20, 1991, that either an amendment
to the planned unit development ordinance must be obtained for the
signs to remain on the ' berm or NTN may appeal the staff's interpreta-
tion of prohibition of signs on the berm. As to either alternative
recommended by David Clements, approval of the Sign Review Board is
required.
NTN relied upon the approval given by Ken Fritz and other Village
officials and the fact that a sign permit was issued and the plans were
approved. In furtherance thereof, NTN has expended over $30,000 in the
construction.and erection of the two free-standing signs.
In the interest of resolving this dispute without the necessity of
litigation, NTN is willing to redesign the signs and 'submit an
application of appeal to the Sign Review Board for the Village of Mt.
Prospect. It is anticipated that the parties will be able to resolve
both the dispute relative to the appearance of the signs and their
location. however, NTN expressly reserves its right to pursue any and
all claims against the Village of Mt. Prospect as a result of its
reliance on the issuance of a permit for the existing signs.
Please confirm that you are willing to recommend approval of the two
.signs with the modifications as set forth in the attached drawing, and
I will have my client file the necessary application with the Sign
Review Board.
Sincerely,
LTD.
Ek4N/ncv0 fgc� 1'-I' TO
I
Cc
a -
P -w -A. flut-s eoft-,?-
post -V brand tax transmittal "neM7671
TO
cllo�
OePL co
PhD"
Fox f Fox I
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM I= CM WA
TO:
Village Manager
4468.82
6.25
FROM:
Director Public Works
DATE:
April 2, 1992
4826.25
No Bid
SUBJ:
Parkway Restoration Bids
Sealed bids were opened on March 31,
1992, for
contractual park-
way restoration. Bid results are
as follows:
Spring 92
Spring 92
Optional/Fall 92
Bidder
Cost/Sq. Yd.
Base Bid
Cost/Square Yd.
America's
Lawn $ 1.95
$1396.13
$ 1.95
& Gardens Inc.
Taking Kare of
6.25
4468.82
6.25
Business
D & J Landscaping
6.75
4826.25
No Bid
Co. Inc.
Arlington Turf
12.00
8580.00
12.00
Landscape Cont.
Autumn Landscaping
121.75
9116.32
13.50
& Mtce. Inc.
Northwestern Land- 13.00 9295.00 13.00
scape Cant. Inc.
Ingram Enter- 14.50 10,367.50 15.00
prises Inc.
This contract provides for the restoration -of excavating maAt, in
Village parkways for water main breaks, hydrant replacements, etc.
The specified work includes excavation and disposal of
sand/stone/clay, replacement with topsoil, compaction, sod installa-
tion and one watering.
The Base Bid price is for 54 sites known at the time of bid letting.
At this point in time it is unknown how many total sites will need
restoration during the term of the contract (annual average has been
approximately 115 sites).
We have the.following concerns about the low bidder, America's Lawn &
Gardens, Inc.
1. They submitted a company check with their bid in lieu of the
required bid bond.
2. The specifications required bidders to supply "at least four
satisfied references in the Suburban Cook County area who can
attest to the Contractorts, ability to fulfill their contract in
a competent and expeditious manner". We spoke with 3 of the
four references America submitted (the fourth being out of
town). America had -not done restoration work of the type re-
quired in our contract for any of the references we contacted.
Two of the references were private homeowners with relatively
small projects.
3. The bid price appears to be unrealistically low. To restore one
square yard to a 21 depth as required in our specifications., at
current market prices materials alone would cast $5.19 ($1.00
for sod and $4.19 for topsoil). We have doubts that America
will be able to perform all the specified work for their bid of
$1.95 per square, yard -
4. After several calls to American Lawn & Gardens-, Inc. they have
not responded so that we can question them about the validity of
their bid. Being that they are sa law, we must- assume an. error
has been made and accordingly they should be disqualified -
5. We have checked the references of the second lowest bidder,
Taking Kare of Business, and although they have done municipal
parkway restoration work one of their references, which we con-
tacted, were not entirely satisfied with their contract perfor-
mance. The other two references- did not include work of the
nature required in this contract. In our opinion they should be
considered as qualified.
On. page 160 of the 1992-93 budget, funds have been allocated. ocatied for
contractual parkway restoration (Account #41-072-05-6250). 1 recom-
mend award of a contract to Taking Kare of Business in an amount not
to exceed -$13,500.00.
lnggc%**�
HLW/eh
PWREST92/FILES/BIDS
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TW aTY tsA
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WORKS
DATE: APRIL 2, 1992
SUBJ: TURF MOWING BID RESULTS
Sealed bids were opened on 3-31-92, for a turf mowing contract.
Attached is a tabulation of bid results.
We have the following concerns about the low bidder, America's
Lawn & Garden, Inc.:
1.) They submitted a company check with their bid in lieu
of the required bid bond.
2.) The specifications required bidders to supply "at
least four satisfied references in the Suburban,
Cook County area who can attest to the Contractor's -
ability to fulfill their contract in a competent and
expeditious manse .11 We spoke with 3 of the four
references America submitted (the fourth being out of
town.) For those three, America had performed snow
removal, not lawn maintenance. one of the three was
dissatisfied with America's quality of work and
unavailability during a snowstorm.
3.) Compared to previous year's bids, which included -fewer
areas than this year's bid, America's bid price is
unrealistically low.
As this is. a. sensitive performance based. contract, I recommend
that the low bid as submitted by America's Lawn & Garden, Inc.
be rejected.
The next low bidder, Autumn, Landscaping & Maintenance, Inc.,
submitted all required information including many municipal and
commercial references and large mowing accounts. We contacted
four and all references were extremely positive.
In the 1992-93 budget, $28,000.00 has been allocated for contrac-
tual turf mowing (Accounts #01-071-03-6115 and 01-071-036-116).
I recommend the award of a turf mowing contract to Autumn Land-
scaping & Maintenance, Inc. in an amount not to exceed
$28,000.00.
dj.3 6&t
Herbert L. Weeks
Attachment
HW/cw
92MOWBI.D/FILES/FORESTRY
TW Mct" 10d Romh - March 31, IM
Exiondod Cost
un*"'A
Ow
votOm
&OW
Nolffn wte�
Owfoa*
"
H- I
***IVASO trgm�
195.00 MOO
&MM
3ML70
468,00
WAO
672. 00
6WIDO
773,50
7N
vw� Hot
Mom LbLc_O
------ ISAMOO
AW?_()
18240--w-00
312.21
0.00
326,30
520.00
S-ioc Cather
mdoo
Mew
malo
MOO
546700
312.00
429D0
772.32
TIOW, Stoll-
_--1-2040
21509
312.00
416.90
2000
0.
E1
00
275._00
---.52-000
X_m,gQ
Mook, Shoot Lot
1 30.00
MOO
468.00
----.LZq
$07,00
740.00
934.00
)"DO
97500
1 A88.74
2621.00
Kt.f-, W."d
140.00
260,00
345.70
364.00442.04
544.21
429..00
774.14
6650.00PIOSP4cl
Avg.
Canto Marble
20509
-Asoo
00
429.00
344_70
52_000
504.00.936.00
97500I
1440.74
2600,2)
Evogru A
C�t. WCWb
3"M
624noo
59&00
-_-Leg 00
'5=
1.23LW
bw 00
�19 g-Or--lds
450,00
572DO
28.00
98OLPQ
175 W�2_5�
27 %�
00
1624.00
L_
8rr,r-t A-
c4rwtw ma"
wm
468,00
1
80-00
74.00
1:222„OD
976.99
_
2-189.72
2600.00
CZQ*k rraov~4
1 26100
229MO
4554011
W, 7 0.04
M
44200
-M
I
P**
480.09.O0
702,00M7
00
280.OD
I mloo
1
11626.00
2301,
7821.44
Conf.rrid Polk
1610.04
2440.00
2,184.21
2,024.00
f 690,00
2-W 00
2366 W
1.950.00'.
91577
7
Ra4road ROW an
Nt Mot, to Qqnt,:O
752M
910
IM
_____792.oq
.
..... 16 O -W
SVD0
......
1 00
2 DOZOO
I
A 275WO
91
Rateroact POW on
MIA, t f,
C*;Mp
tr
0
1,3MM
LA?S 00
' 1AZLtj
j_17M
RbW QQ �
7
6
6500
)W m Pr�
�=M P' t
1,78so.
7A?Rm
2,14600
lft�,
--m
a A32,W
6200.00L
7-2-W-N-
�tZ9l 64
11.700.00
R.* -d ROW - NW
to W FN�f Rd
21500DO
3250 W
4D56.00
4,137 121
3.51000
964,DG
4-W,00
LO
131146.561
18200.00
R.
40
4
X 77
7 QQ
q,73ZOO
7 BOOM
IW
-00 00
W,PI B. Ca+tll:o
SWW
1-040.00
1.7014M
1,014. 001
_I DNQgi
754,00
94 DD
?MDD
_Z6,04
4670.M31
00
W.444. WION W*notly
00
3M.701
MOO
494.00.rOM�
42000
1007..
Wow T-
135D0
M�182�MWVQ
W 0'
W"O,
910.00
wtortoi S..iely
10 �IS. 0
4?.� 00
MOO
598M
WDO
7W .
1-711. �w
w
WM
o75-
5
1,99,L46
99 M740.
3
12§ CO
3XI0
209
44
, 2A
3
68 50
78000
& Pgt!�M
..... 48(LOO
4MOO
611nO
507.00
74021........
E&W
1,4,V,00
W&DO
?234 It
2bwoo
Fir. Slob- 2
_13-000
W,OO
1
444.00
334.39022
4?M
601 N
6,W 2g
210.00
260DO
3SC70
404.00
MOO
468-001
975,00
976M
Z80,00
aii0gory1wom Lot
ot,0 jqmAqnq pwq-
2ACLOO
780.00
760
10.00
728M
975.00
p L qq00
- W01#17
37000
-LORM
010001
1414,00
low
_-1,0-4000
1,170,00
1. ,00
J198., 4
... _
2bm
- kmilyzLe 83
3
780DD
940.001
ID140D
I MM
IOM„
78_000
4Z86A0
- Hk�ftw Lot
2,0.00w
w
4229..
50740
80.00.
..... §7
7 4.
_-JAP-000
1A90.11
___ZAMA
00
NW!4SftM - 1>0* to F~
;W OD
392 00
44
607.00
78M0,000
5
MOO
I "Mo
I W70
1.040.00
G.K Rood d
2M.00
22WOM 1
31
W,70
494,00
41 M
5
3-5
3 9_W00
Carapay/MaC"oCN. ild#
.1 C.10 F of Gr1
I $ZDD
3",70
364M
312,00
468.0D
....
52000
Prolp*Ct A". "I
W, Pr .. I
j.P_%
mw
inm
W.70
364,21
.21
804.06
214.06
I
----
76050
91000
598.
650.40
11 S. PV. St.
1 -00
IS&
3" 70
208.00
-?at%
34.41.
32500
492.1
MOM
10 1 ftw sc CAgge Lot)
380.00
650.W
726,00
76050
91%pp
------ PM
54600
650-00
4.
480 .00
SChuMB of
Ax -_OO
glow
1401.20
1.014.00
1 XW.00�840
1.326tLO
00
4MLSO
3120,92
21040
260.00
260.00
3M.701
52000
SO&0.)
650.40
450,00
41.00
2604,04
Canto DO" & PW'4 Rood
170.00
WOO _
390.00
358101
650.00
83200
720.00
660.00
1.040.21
yo,ky =*to
at K
_22000
30040
520,00
507.2)
La(LOO
962,23
780.00
650.00
1975,22
I
Erns oft
Rood of ��
20000
2�0_0
388.
494.24
j2s.w
442,00
325.00,
1,040.14
14M.27
Feehamft &
Won RCL Catty walld
- I40I001
260.00
42 00
50744
7$0100
IMOD
MOO
275.001
1115.22
780.00
%tqp_O C4ntw Mad
10540I
260.21
MM
W,70
520.001
624.00
312M
429001
660.66
Woo
Oxxton Cf, Cw#w WW4
- 106.00
260,00
260.001
388.70
520.00
624.00,
31ZOD
MO.&A
$2000
Laky V$Ow Ct. Cama Mand
120.00
249.21
325,001
344.70
§2
.2-W
62f,,9q
11 2,CQ
_429,001
00
64066,
520,40
SoMn Ct.. Cwttgt Wald
105.00
260.21
MDO
3WOL
20 CR
624,00
312M
429.00
158.16
520M
Ct. C -Ow worXI
34IL70
520.0c1
62400
312O0
.
4W.W
....
756.101
52040I
void
.492.0000.
144 4O'
b4 .9O
$ I U�U24
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO
DATE: APRIL 2, 1992
SUBJECT: TWO INCH HOSE AND NOZZLES
The fire department has completed a feasibility study attempting to
determine the advantages of converting from inch and one-half
diameter initial attack hose line to two inch diameter.
The study indicated the two inch diameter hose will give us
improved versatility on the fireground. The addition of this size line
will give the fire officer another option which would match the size
hose with the number of personnel available to man it. The more
men available, the larger the diameter hose can be used which would
deliver a greater number of gallons per minute on the fire.
During the feasibility study, five different types of, hose were tested.
Our findings indicate that the Imperial brand hose proved to be the
easiest to handle and tended to kink less under lower pressures than
other brands.
In our bid specifications we indicated our preference for Imperial
and Angus brands. Sealed bids were opened on March 24, 1992, at
10:00 a.m. for the purpose of purchasing two inch diameter hose and
matching nozzles.
Bids were based on the following quantities:
Quantity Dgscription
60 50 ft lengths of yellow, 2" double jacketed,
hypalon saturated. 100% polyester hose with
1-1/2" couplings. Hose will pass 800 psi
acceptance test. Imperial hose preferred.
4 50 ft. lengths of light weight high rise
type of 2" hose with 1-1/2" couplings. Angus
"High Power" preferred.
12 Saber tip nozzles with 1-1/2" female NST,
1-1/2" male NST, pyrolite, with set screw and
1-1/8' bore. Akron or Elkhart are
acceptable.
The bid results are as follows:
BIDDER
59 LENGTHS
100` LENGTHS
1-1/8" TIPS
GREAT LAKES
$110.00 EA.
$208.00 EA.
$55.00 EA.
ABLE
$163`'.00 EA
$276.00 EA
$59.85 EA
DOLTUN
$ 94.50 EA
NOT IMPERIAL
$172.50 EA
NOT IMPERIAL
WRONG
PRODUCT
MACS
$101.00 EA
NOT IMPERIAL
$190.00
NOT IMPERIAL
$ 57.00 EA
Funds are available in the 91/92 Budget on Page 86, under Account
Code 51-042-02-8017, The total purchase will be $7,760.00. , I
recommend the purchase from Great Lakes Fire Equipment.
J4 /C�- -4/t
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
EMC/mah
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= CrrV t5A
TO: village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: April 3, 1992
SUBJ: Sealed Bid Results
Compact Station Wagon
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 a.m. on March 31, 1992, for the
proposed purchase of one compact station wagon. Twelve invita-
tional bids were sent out plus advertising as required by law.
The following three responses were recei-ved-
Bidder Make/Model Delivery
Hoskins Chevrolet Chev. Cavalier 6 - 8 weeks
VL Wagon
Tom Todd Chevrolet Chev. Cavalier 60 days
Inc. RS Wagon
Lattof Chevrolet Chev. IJC35 Wagon 4 - 9 weeks
Bid Price
$10,700.00
$10,898.42
$11,462.32
This is a replacement vehicle which is intended for general transpor-
tation by administrative and inspection personnel at the Village
Hall_ Funding for this proposed purchase Ls includecl in the new
1992-93 budget in the amount of $12,500.00. There is no trade-in on
this purchase and the old unit will be offered for sale at the NWMC
fall auction. Hoskins. Chevrolet has notified- us that they made an
error in their bid and that the vehicle they bid on will not meet our
specifications. Therefore I recommend that they be disqualified.
I recommend acceptance of the lowest- acceptable bid as: submitted- by
Tom Todd Chevrolet on a Chevrolet Cavalier RS station wagon in an
amount not to exceed $10,898.42.
HLW/eh
WAGOPEN/FILES/BIDS
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE: April 1, 1992
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION
92 -00000 -02 -QM - Resurfacing Prog[arn
On April 1st, 1992, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the Resurfacing
Program/1992 General Maintenance. At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened
and read aloud.
BIDS RECEIVED
A total of six Contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of $403,982.79 by
Arrow Road Construction to a high of $572,342.40 by Callaghan Paving. The Engineer's
Estimate for the project was $435,920.00.
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bid as required by the
Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds.
BIDDER'S
TOTAL BID
Arrow Road Construction Co.
$403,982.79
Palumbo Bros, Inc.
$420,608.33
Allied Asphalt Paving Co.
$433,403.00
Peter Baker & Son, Inc.
$456,588.96
J.A. Johnson Paving Co.
$529,139.15
Callaghan Paving, Inc.
$572,342.40
Page 2
92-00000-02-GM/RESURFACING PROGRAM
OUAIMCAMONS OF LQW BIDD
The low bidder, Arrow Road Construction Co., has completed the Village's Resurfacing
Program over the past several years. For the most part their quality of work is acceptable
and they complete their projects in a timely manner.
RECOMMENDAITON
Based on the Bids received, I recommend awarding a Contract to Arrow Road
Construction Co., Mount Prospect, with a Bid price of $403,982.79.
Funding for this project is shown on Page 139 of the 1992-93 budget
as follows:
ACCOUNT NO, BUDGET AMOUNT CONTRACT AMOUNT
22-071-04-8505 $650,000.00 $403,582.79
51-07-04-8515 $Iffl.000100 $ 400.00
$750,000.00 $403,982.79
(J@*rA. Wulbecker, P.E.
ngineexig Coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
Charles Bencic, P.E.
Director of Inspection Services
I concur with the above recommendation
Herbert L Weeks
I I
Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
1992 General Maintenance Resurfacing Program
92 -00000 -02 -GM
April 1, 1992
10:00 A.M.
No.
Item
Esitmated Rrrow Road Constr_, Co.
Quantities Mount Prospect 111, 60056
Palumbo Bros., Inc.
Hillside, 111, 60162
Allied Asphalt Paving Co.
Hillside 111, 60162
Peter Baker &Son Co.
L ke Bluff, 111 60044
Johnson Paving
Arlington Heights Ill. 60056
Callaghan Paving, Inc.
Hinsdale 111, 60521
1.
BIT. CONC SURFACE CRSE MIX D TY 2 CL 1
6808
23.95
163,051.60
22.35
152,158.80
23.20
157,945.60
24.85
169,178,80
26.80
182,454.40
27.00
183,816.00
2.
LEVEL BINDER (MM) MIX C, TY 2
1012
23.10
23,377.20
22.35
22,618.20
22.65
22,921.80
23.80
24,085.60
25.50
25,806.00
28.00
28,336.00
3.
LEVEL BINDER (MM) MIX B, TY 2
5915
21.40
126,581.00
22.35
132,200.25
21.00
124,215.00
22.15
131,017.25
26.00
153,790.00
27.00
159,705.00
4.
BIT MATLS PRIME COAT MC -30
826
0.01
9.26
1.00
826.00
0.65
536.90
1.00
826.00
1.50
1,239.00
1.00
826.00
S.
BIT MATLS PRIME COAT RC -70
7210
0.01
72.10
0.70
5,047.00
0.65
4,686.50
0.80
5,768.00
j 1.25
9,012.50
1.00
7,210.00
6.
PREPARATION OF BASE
57583
0.01
575.83
0.20
11,516.60
0.10
5,758.30
0.15
8,637.45
0.25
14,395.75
1.00
57,583.00
7,
BIT SURF REMOVAL 2"
11303
0.71
8,025.13
0.75
8,477.25
0.95
10,737.85
1.00
11,303.00
1.20
13,563.60
0.95
10,737.95
8.
BIT SURF REMOVAL 2.5" I
76919
0.75
57,614.25
0.85
65,296.15
1.09
83,732.71
1.00
76,819.00
1.30
99,864.70
1.05
90,659.95
9.
AREA REFL CRACK CONTROL SYSTEM A
13476
0.67
9,028.92
0.58
7,816.08
0.59
7,950.84
0.61
8,220.36
0.70
9,433.20
1.10
14,823.60
10.
PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT (SPECIAL)
110
37.60
4,136.00
25.00
2,750.00
32.00
3,520.00
19.00
2,090.00
16.00
1,760.00
20.00
2,200.00 ;
11.
STRUCTURES TO BE ADJUSTED
31
133.00
4,123.00
130.00
4,030.00
140.00
4,340.00
140.00
4,340.00
125.00
3,875.00
135.00
4,185.00'
12.
STRUCTURES TO BE RECONSTRUCTED
7
330.00
2,310.00
300.00
,
2,100.00
550.00
3,850.00
500.00
3,500.00
350:00
2,450.00
400.00
2,8[0.00
13.
THPL PAVEMENT MARKING 6" YELLOW
500
0.65
325.00
0.70
350.00
0.69
345.00
0.72
360.00
0.80
400.00
1.00
500.00
14.
THPL PAVEMENT MARKING 12" WHITE
1730
1.65
2,854.50
1.40
2,422.001
1.25
2,162.50
L45
2,508.50
1.50
2,595.00
2.00
3,4010.00
15.
TRAFFIC CONTROL & PROTECTION
1
1,500.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
` 600.00
600.00
7,280.00
7,280.00
7,500.00
7,500.00
15,000.00
[�
15,000.00
NON MFT
16.
MAINTENANCE BOND -24 MONTH
I
1 i
400.00
400.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
100.00
100.00
655.00
655.00
1,000.00
1,000.00
500,00
500.00
403,982.79
420,608.33
433,403.00
456,588.96
529,139.15
572,342.40
ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE $435,920.00
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: April 1, 1992
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION
92 -00000 -03 -GM - Curb & Gutter Program
On April 1st, 1992, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the Curb & Gutter
Program/1992 General Maintenance. At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened
and read aloud.
BIDS RECEIVED
A total of nine Contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of $276,858.20 by
Roadworks, Inc. to a high of $362,050.40 by Martarn. Construction Co. The Engineer's
Estimate for the project was $319,549.10.
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 5% of their total bid as required by the
Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds.
BIDDER'S TOTAL BID
Roadworks, Inc. $276,858.20
Trialta Construction Co. $278,611.60
Gem Construction Co. $283,313.00
F & V Cement Co. $295,014.53
Globe Construction Co. $295,888.60
M & A Cement Co.
$295,975.44
Schroeder & Schroeder
$325,534.67
M & C Scavelli, Inc.
$326,115.20
Martarn, Construciton Co.
$362,050.40
Page 2
92-00000-03-GM/CURB & GUTTER PROGRAM
QUALIFICAMNS OF LOW BIDDER
The low bidder, Roadworks, Inc. will be new a contractor to the Village of Mount Prospect.
A reference check revealed that this company is four years old and has completed several
satisfactory projects for the City of Chicago. This year, Roadworks, Inc. decided to expand
their operations into the suburbs. They are about to start a concrete curb and gutter
project in Streamwood.
RECOMMENDATION
Based on the Bids received, I recommend awarding a Contract to Roadworks, Inc., Chicago,
II, with a Bid price of $276,858.20.
Funding for this project is shown on Page 139 of the 1992-93 budget as follows:
ACCOUNT NO, BUDGEIAMOUN CONTRACT AMOUNT
22-071-04-8505 $650,000.00 $246,417.21
51-071-04-8515 $100.000,00 30,440.99
$750,000.00 $276,85820
19 ulbecker, P.E. =19 Coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
Charles Bencic, P.E.
Director of Inspection Services
I concur with the above recommendation
Herbert L Weeks
Director of Public Works
Pillage of m-unl 11-1 cl
1992 General ivlaintenen - Curb & GHUr, R -p,, I'Tog,,I
92-tXXM-03-CM
April 1, 1992
Ind() A M
Fngnwcr'e Fiumuc
9 00 182.047. W
10.. 2,710.'
IIm 14036.W
15000 8.7m..
40000 3.60000
250 W 7-250.00 1
275 990000
3m 13,501.01
300 31,816.00
5 W 23.440.00
2,00ow 2,.D.M
50100 500-W
319.549.0 i
- _- -
R -d -k. !nc
Schaxdcr & S..hraednr Erc. M & C Seevelii Inc.
Tmh. Canalrnclion
Marlem Conairvalion, inc.
OEM Conn., tom..
No.
P & V Ccmcnl Coaai.,
Inc
OtWie Canelmc0an inc.
,Chicega
M & A Ccmcnl WaA Inc.
N. Rem
QuanRliee�Chicaga
IIi, 60612
C MDCONCCURD&OUTTHR REML&REPL
Addiaan IB 60101
9.89
Woa4Dale- U 60191
10.40
Chicago RL 60631
10.811
Addreon Iil -00101
2.
Bcnxnedlc< BI tb10€.
271
{. COMB CONC CURB &GUTTER AEML & A£PL
20233
, 900
182.097 W
6.eO
169.957.20.
8.78
171..5 71
9.25
187,155.25
8.85
179,062.0.5
9 SO
-- --. -
IY2,374.50
2. INTEORALCONCCURBREML&REPL
271
1100
2.71000
10.00
2711WI
9%
2d11.90�
10.00
2.71000
9.25
2,506.75
9.50
WDO
3. COMB CONC CURB REML & TY B 6.12 REPL
I27b
9.50
12.122.20
900
11.48,. DU
a 90
1 t, 356.40
9.85
12.568.60
9.00
11,4" M
9.50
12,122.00 1
4, CU RB STRUCTURE TO BE ADJUSTED
58
4000
2,320.00
mm
7,540.00
SO DO
8700.00
135.W
7,83000
133.00
7,SMM
75M
-0350.00
5. CURB STRUCTURETO DB RECONSTRUCTED
9
13000
1.3.5000
40000
3,600.001i
doom
3,600.001
39S 00
3,46500
375.00
3,375.00
300.00
2,700..
6. CU RB STR TO BE ADI wtTY I PR OL
291
150m
4.35000
270.00
783000
32%M
9,425 Do
235..
681500
'325.00
9,425..
200.00
5,WDM
7. BIT DRIVEWAY REML & REPL
36M
` 2.00
7.?DO.M
165
"1O.W
1.50
5,400 00 j
1.49
S, 36, 00
2.25
B,IM W
3.25
I1,7..M
8 PCC DRIVEWAY RE34L&REPL h'
45W
2.40
](1.800.
280
10,8.00
2.23
10035.
2.39
10, 75S
255
U875.M
2.42
IO.890..
9. PCC SIDEWALK REML&REPL S'
17272
2.35
-00,589.20
2.20
37,99880
2.18
37.652.96
229
39,552.88
2.45
42,316.40
232
44).07104
10. SODDING (SPECIAL)
4688
2.50
13 720.1
404)
18,752.1
3.25
15,236.0[)
38s
18,048.80
3.80
17,814.40
2.S5
11.954.40
11. TRAFPIC CONTROL & PROTECTION
1 1
1.4)0000
14)00.002,
1.00000
Low, of
11 1.10000
I, I..m
300.00
500.00
1.50.00
1,5..m
woo
800.00
NO Mn
IT MAINTENANCE BOND -24 MONTH
1
600.00
600.001
1,00000
1.0.00
7.50.00
750.0D
250..
250.20
1000.00
1,000.00
8.0(1
800..
856.20
278,61160
283,313.00
295.014 53
295,88660
295,915.44
Fngnwcr'e Fiumuc
9 00 182.047. W
10.. 2,710.'
IIm 14036.W
15000 8.7m..
40000 3.60000
250 W 7-250.00 1
275 990000
3m 13,501.01
300 31,816.00
5 W 23.440.00
2,00ow 2,.D.M
50100 500-W
319.549.0 i
- _- -
Schaxdcr & S..hraednr Erc. M & C Seevelii Inc.
Marlem Conairvalion, inc.
-'
F i. -d
No.
Item
."k.
Skokie BI, 60076
,Chicega
HL 60656
Olen FJIYn III, W137
I.
C MDCONCCURD&OUTTHR REML&REPL
202➢➢
9.89
200,100.3738
10.40
?10,423.2(11
10.811
1ig,51C.dli
2.
INTEGRAL CONC CURB REML & REPL
271
10.50
2,845.50E
12 M
3,25200
` 12.
3,25200
3
COMB CONC CURB RIM1 & TY 116 12 REPL
1276
I! SO
1, 67400 111
10.50
13,398..
11..
14.036. W
4
CURB STRUCTURE TO BB ADJUSTED
58
25000
14.500.
m 00
8,700 m
m m
9,860.00 1
5.
CURB STRUCTURE TO BE RECONSTRUCTED
9
WDO
4.500 aD
SODm
45W OD
30D DO
2,70.00
6.
CURB STR TO BE ADI w1TY 1 PR OL
29
350.00
i0, I50m
350.00
HLIM 00
32000
9,280.. q
7
RIT DRIVEWAY REML& REPL
36M
200
7"15.00
1.50
5.4...
150
Salm..
8.
PCC DRIVEWAY REML &REPL 6'
, 500
2_W
117..00
2.30
10,350.
3.SD
15,7 Do
9.
PCC SIDEWALK REML &REPL 5'
77272
2.40
1 452.80
2.25
38,86200
300
5181600
]O.
SODDING (SPECIAL)
4688
3.50
i6,dil8 W 1
3.75
17,58090
3-.
23,440..
1I.
TRAFPIC CONTROL&PROTECTION1
J.
1.0...
2.50000
2,SW.m
.
5,OW
3,000.
NO
MFT
12.
MAINTENANCE BOND -24 MONTH
1
I.MO.M
L.
I OMm
3,4)0000
300000
l
325,534-67
326,115.20
362,050.40
Fngnwcr'e Fiumuc
9 00 182.047. W
10.. 2,710.'
IIm 14036.W
15000 8.7m..
40000 3.60000
250 W 7-250.00 1
275 990000
3m 13,501.01
300 31,816.00
5 W 23.440.00
2,00ow 2,.D.M
50100 500-W
319.549.0 i
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director
DATE: April 1, 1992
SUBJECT: Adoption of Budget Ordinance
An Ordinance providing for an Annual Budget in lieu of an Appropriation Ordinance, a copy of
the Public Notice establishing a Public Hearing on April 21, 1992 and a summary of revenue and
expenditure changes are attached to this memo. The Notice indicates the revised budget amounts
as a result of the changes approved by the Village Board on March 24, 1992 and the inclusion
of the Library's budget request. The summary of budget changes includes the original amount
proposed, the revised amount and the net increase or decrease. Total revised Village revenues
have been decreased from $38,816,395 to $39,643,395 and total revised Village expenditures have
been decreased from $45,368,100 to $45,321,300.
The following procedures are required before the budget can be adopted:
1. Announcement at the Village Board meeting on April 7, 1992 of a public hearing
on the tentative annual budget to be held on April 21, 1992.
2. First reading of the Budget Ordinance on April 7, 1992.
3. Publication of the Public Notice of the Budget Hearing on April 8, 1992 in the
Mount Prospect Herald.
4. Public Hearing on April 21, 1992 on the tentative annual budget.
5. Adoption of the Budget Ordinance on April 21, 1992.
6. Filing a copy of the Budget Ordinance with the County Clerk after adoption.
Revised copies of the budget which will reflect any changes made at the Public Hearing will
then be compiled and will be available prior to May 1, 1992.
DCJ/sm.
Enc
PUBLIC NOTICE
A Budget Hearing will be held on April 21, 1992 for all interested citizens of
the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois. The following budget is proposed for
fiscal year beginning May 1, 1992:
Village Funds:
General
Fund . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. .$16,474,500
Special
Revenue Funds . . . . . . . . .
. . 4,751,365
Debt Service Funds. . . . . . . . . .
1,975,895
Capital
Projects Funds. . . . . . . . .
10,924,660
Enterprise
Funds . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 6,749,665
Internal
Service Funds. . . . . . . . .
. . 3,095,415
Pension
Funds . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 1,942,500
Totals . . . . . *' ' ' * .
. . $45,914,000
Less Interfund Transfers.
. < 592,700
Totals - Village Funds. . .
.$45,321,300
Library Fund.
. . . . . . . . .
2,870,425
Totals -
Village and Library Funds. . .
. .548.191.725
The meeting will be held in the Mount Prospect Senior Center, 50 South Emerson
Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois, for the purpose of discussion of the proposed
budget at 7:30 p.m. The proposed budget may be examined on weekdays in the
Office of the Village Clerk in the Village Hall, 100 S. Emerson Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois between 8:30 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. All interested citizens will
have the opportunity to give written and oral comments. Senior Citizens are
encouraged to'attend and comment.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
Village Manager
Published in Mt. Prospect Herald April 8, 1992.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
COMMENCING MAY 1, 1992 TO APRIL 30, 1993 IN LIEU OF
PASSAGE OF AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect in
accordance with Statutes, have provided for the preparation and adoption of an annual
budget in lieu of passage of an Appropriation Ordinance for the fiscal year commencing
May 1, 1992 to April 30, 1993; and
WHEREAS, the tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect for the fiscal
year beginning May 1, 1992„ and ending April 30, 1993, as prepared by the Budget Officer
for the Village and submitted to the President and Board of Trustees, was placed on file
in the Office of the Village Clerk on April 7, 1992, for public inspection, as provided by
Statute; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to notice duly published on April 8, 1992, a public hearing was held
by the President and Board of Trustees on said tentative annual budget on April 21, 1992,
as provided by statute; and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said tentative annual budget was reviewed by
the President and Board of Trustees and a copy of said tentative annual budget is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect beginning
May 1, 1992 and ending April 30, 1993, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby approved and adopted as the Annual Budget for the Village of Mount
Prospect for said fiscal year.
SECTION TWO: Within thirty (30) days following the adoption of this Ordinance there
shall be filed with the County Clerk of Cook County a copy thereof duly certified by the
Village Clerk and Estimate of Revenues by source anticipated to be received by the Village
in the fiscal year beginning May 1, 1992 and ending April 30, 1993, duly certified by the
Chief Fiscal Officer.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of April, 1.992.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
CarUA. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1992-1993 Budget Changes
Revenues
General Fund
1-000-00-4013 Retailers Occupation Tax
1-000-00-4150 State Income Tax
1-000-00-4151 State Sales Tax
1-000-00-4153 State Use Tax
1-000-00-4164 Personal Property Repl Tax
General Fund Changes
All Other General Fund Revenues
Revised General Fund Revenues
Motor Fuel Ta ;s Eu_n
22-000-00-4157 MFT Allocation
All Other MFT Fund Revenues
Revised MFT Fund Revenues
Capital Improvement Fun
51-000-00-4152 State Income Tax Surcharge
All Other Capital Impry Revenues
Revised Capital Impry Revenues
All Other Village Funds
Total Village Revenues
Less: Interfund Transfers
Revised Village Revenues
92-93 92-93
Proposed Revised Increase or
Budget Budget <Decrease
$ 6,100,000 $ 6,000,000 $< 100,000>
2,050,000 2,070,000 20,000
85,000 66,500 < 18,500>
250,000 265,000 15,000
105,000 103.000 < 2,000>
$ 8,590,000 $ 8,504,500 $< 85,500>
7,838,500 7J38,500
$16,428,500 $16,343,000 $< 85 500>
$ 1,100,000 $ 1,047,500 $< 52,500>
50,100 50,100 -
$ 1,150J00 $ 1,097,600 $< 52,500>
$ 1,025,000 $ 990,000 $< 35,000>
679,800 679,800
$ 1,704,800 $ 1,669.800 $< 35.000>
$21,125,695 $21,125,695 $ -
$40,409,095 $40,236,095 173,000>
< 592�700> ....< ........... 59.2., 00> -
2—
J39,816J95 111.113395 173,000>
Library Fund Revenues L.2�Q 42�5 2 2,870,425
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1992-1993 Budget Changes
Expenditures
92-93 92-93
Proposed Revised Increase or
Budget Budget <Decrease
General Fund
1-042-04-5843 Overtime Public Education $ 5,500 $ 7,500 $ 2,000
1-042-04-5844 Overtime Inspection 4,000 7,000 3,000
1-062-03-6695 Redevelopment Services 15,000 50,000 35,000
1-081-03-5810 P W Overtime - 3,000 3,000
1-081-03-7395 White Light Supplies - 3,000 3,000
Total General Fund Changes $ 24,500 $ 70,500 $ 46,000
All Other General Fund Expenditures 16,404,000 16.404,000 -
Revised General Fund Expenditures $16,428,500 $16,474,500 $ 46,000
Capital Improvement Fund
51-077-81-8007 District 57 Auditorium $ 300,000 $ 370,000 $ 70,000
51-077-91-8090 New Technology Projects - 50,00050,000
Total Capital Impry Changes $ 300,000 $ 420,000 $ 120,000
All Other Capital Impry Expenditures1,453,960 1.453,960
Revised Capital Impry Expenditures $ 1,753,960 $ 1.873,960 $ 120,000
Flood Control Const Funds
58-077-65-8103 Stevenson/Thayer Area
59-077-65-8107 Central/WaPella
59-077-65-8109 Hatlen Heights Sewer
Total Flood Control Changes
All Other Flood Control Expend
Revised Flood Control Expend.
$ 1,300,000 $ - $<1,300,000>
1,750,000 3,650,000 1,900,000
850.000 - < 850,000
$ 3,900,000 $ 3,650,000 < 250,000>
1,155,800 1,155,800
$ 5,055,800 $ 4,805,800 $< 250,000>
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1992-1993 Budget Changes
Expenditures
92-93 92-93
Proposed Revised Increase or
Budzet Budget <Decrease>
Vehicle Replacement Fund
48-077-93-8441 Replace 2 Police Vehicles $ - $ 37,200 $ 37,200
All Other Vehicle Replacement Expend 546,215 546,215 -
Revised Vehicle Replacement Expend. $ 546,215 $ 583,415 $ 37,200
All Other Village Funds
Total Village Expenditures
Less Interfund Transfers
Revised Village Expenditures
Library Fund Expenditures
$22,176,325 $22,176,325 $
$45,960,800 $45,914,000 $< 46,800>
< 592,700> < 592�700> -
$45,368,100 4S LI 300 �68O0>
2 870 425 2.870 425
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 4i
TO: Mr. John Fulton Dixon, Village manager
FROM: Chuck Bencic, Inspection Services Director
DATE: March 31, 1992
RE: CAMP KC DONALD RD. — COUNTY HIGHWAY AGREEMENT
In response to my memo to you dated February 3, 1992 (see attched) ,
Buzz Hill requested a letter from Prospect Heights indicating we would
be able to retain our access points on the south side of Camp Mc Donald
Road. A copy of the Prospect Heights letter stating we will be able
to keep existing access is attached. Therefore I am also attaching
the six (6) copies of the County Agreement for your submission to our
Village Board for the appropriate resulution and signatures.
Chuck Bencic
CB: rm
Attach.
cc: Carol Fields, Village Clerk
File
1��_....✓
'APR 2 1992
CAF/
4/2/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
TO TRANSFER JURISDICTION OF THAT PORTION OF
CAMP MC DONALD ROAD, LOCATED WITHIN THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES
CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
TO THE CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
WHEREAS, the Cook County Highway Department and Illinois Department
of Transportation have entered into agreements with the City of
Prospect Heights and the Village of Arlington Heights to assume
jurisdictional responsibility for that portion of Camp Mc Donald
Road; and
WHEREAS, a portion of Camp Mc Donald Road is located within the
corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
has determined that the best interests of the residents would be
served by transferring the jurisdiction for maintenance of Camp Mc
Donald Road presently located within the corporate boundaries of
the Village of Mount Prospect to the City of Prospect Heights.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That, pursuant to the Illinois HIghway Code, the
corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby
agree to transfer the jurisdiction of that portion of Camp Mc
Donald presently located within the corporate limits of the Village
of Mount Prospect to the City of Prospect Heights.
SECTION TWO: That the Mayor and Village Clerk of the Village of
Mount Prospect is hereby authorized to execute an Agreement between
the Illinois Department of Highways and the City of Prospect
Heights transferring jurisdiction of that portion of Camp Mc Donald
Road lying within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount
Prospect to the City of Prospect Heights, a copy of said Agreement
is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed for forward copies of the Resolution and attachments to
those entities being parties to said Agreement.
SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
0
ILLINOIS DEPART ? T CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
OF TRANSPORTATION THE ODUM OF COOK VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
(Conveyor) Recipients, and
LOCAL AGENCY AGRE11vMIT VILLAGE OF WHEELING
JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER VILLAGE OF MO(M PROSPECT,
Consentors to transfer
(The Villages of CIheelinq and Mount Prospect are also parties to this agreement for
assent to a transfer). IN ACCORDANCE WITH AUTHORITY granted in Section 4-409 of the
Illinois Highway Code, this agreement is made and entered into between the above
local agencies to transfer the jurisdiction of CAMP YAMONAID ROAD, County Highway PL58,
Rand Road to West Right of ny Line of Mandel Lane, 2.55 miles in len qth overall,
as follows:
Rand Road to Dale Avenue, 0.15 mile, to Village of Arlington Heights
Dale Avenue to Mandel Lane, 2.40 mile, to City of Prospect Heights
Total Length 2.55 mile
Camp McDonald Road lies along the boundaries of Sections 21 and 28, 22 and 27, 23 and
26, and 24 and 25 of Wheeling Township, T42N, Rll E of the 3rd PM;
Whereas the authority to make changes to municipal street systems is granted munici-
palities by Section 7-101 of the Illinois Highway Code; authority to make changes to
the County Highway System is granted the County by Section 5-105 of said code;
Now, Therefore, Recipients City of Prospect Heights and Village of Arlington Heights
have each passed resolutions, concurrently with their executing this agreement,
declaring intent to add the above segments of Camp McDonald Road to their respective
jurisdictions as mmicipal streets, as further explained in Addendum #1 hereinafter;
the Village of Wheeling and Mount Prospect have passed Resolutions and executed the
agreement indicating consent to jurisdictional transfers of portions of Carp McDonald
Road,
within said Village's respective jurisdictions to other municipalities.
Conveyor The County of Cook has passed a Resolution, Addendum #4 declaring intent
to remove Camp McDonald from the County Highway System as described in Addendum #1
and has attached a location map, Addendum #2, showing the changes to take place, with
the maintenance of Camp McDonald Road to be accepted by the municipalities on a
different basis than their acceptance of jurisdiction; the Illinois Departrrent
of Transportation's approval of this agreement, below puts it into effect and conveys
approval of the proposed. jurisdictional transfer, the terms of the agreement and
the location imp; the actual transfer of jurisdiction to be effective upon notification
from said Department of Transportation that is has received evidence that the
municipalities accepting jurisdiction have done so from final inspection of the
carpleted prQjects, and that the two municipalities with corporate limits over
parts of the road to fall under jurisdiction of other municipalities consent to same.
This agreement shall beccue effective after having been executed by the County, mount
Prospect, Arlington Heights and Prospect Heights on the date the Director of Highways,
Illinois Department of Transportaticn, affixes his signature of approval following
the Director to cause an original of the agreement to be returned to each of the
five ve parties (the Illinois Department of Transportation not being a party) .
,4 �
Camp McDonald Road SIGNATURES PAGE
Rand Road - West R.o.W Line, Mandel Lane
Executed by the parties on the date of adopted ordinances and resolutions attached:
THE CO=Y OF COOK, Conveyor village of Wheeling
f 17
By: By:
President, Board of County Village President
Commissioners
Agreement Approved by
Illinois Department of Trafisportation
Director of Highways
Date
Effective Date of Agreement
Approved as to Form
Jack O'Malley, State's Attorney
By
Assistant State's Attorney
City of.Prospect Heights, Recipient
By:
Mayor
Village of Mount Prospect
By:
Mayor
Village of Arlington Heights, Recipient
Mayor
ADDENDUM #1 STIPULATIONS
Concerning an agreement between the County of Cook, the Village of
Wheeling, the City of Prospect Heights, the Village of Arlington
Heights and the Village of Mount Prospect, for improving Camp
McDonald Road between Rand Road and west right-of-way line of
Mandel Lane and subsequently transferring jurisdiction and main-
tenance from the County to the aforesaid municipalities.
1. The improvement, by the County at County cost (except for new
sidewalks and/or street lighting), shall consist of a four lane cross
section from Rand Road to Dale Avenue, three lane cross section from
Dale Avenue to west right-of-way line of Mandel Lane; intersection
channelization as determined from design study, and reconstruction
of the drainage structure at McDonald Creek, No. 3902, presently a
slab bridge;
The County will:
a. Upon receipt of approval of final plans from Mount Prospect,
Arlington Heights, Prospect Heights, and Wheeling, based on
previously approved preliminary plans, advertise, let, award,
construct and supervise construction; pay for the cost of
the improvement excepting new sidewalk (not replacement side-
walk) and street lighting;
b. Coordinate all matters requiring same with the municipalities
through all design and construction phases, invite them to
bring any matters of concern to the County resident's
attention, and to participate in final inspection;
C. Transfer jurisdiction of Camp McDonald Road to Mount Prospect,
Arlington Heights and Prospect Heights (the latter subject
to approval of the Village of Wheeling over part of same),
subsequent to acceptance of each municipality of that part
of the improvement as listed on the previous page hereto,
and transfer maintenance of said road to each municipality
accepting jurisdiction within the jurisdictional limits.
The Villages of Wheeling; Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect and
the City of Prospect. Heights will each'
a. Promptly review plans submitted by the County and comment
on same so as to avoid unnecessary delay.
b. With respect to the corporate limits of each municipality,
pay for the construction, installation and operating costs
of any new sidewalk and/or street lighting desired by that
ADDENDUM #1 STIPULATIONS Page 2
municipality to be included in the project; payments are to be made
by check payable to the Treasurer for Cook County for deposit in the
County's Motor Fuel Tax Fund Account 600-570, and sent to the Super-
intendent of Highways; payments are to be made within thirty days of
date of a sta--ement from the County to the municipalities involved
after acceptance of the sidewalk and/or lighting from final inspection.
Acquire any right-of-way needed within their respective
corporate limits, without cost to the County, certify when
same has been acquired, and file copies of plats and legal
descriptions with the County for record.
4. The City of Prospect Heights will:
a. Pass the Ordinance, Addendum #3 -PH hereto, declaring intent
to accept jurisdiction over Camp McDonald Road from Dale
Avenue to the west right-of-way line of Mandel Lane following
acceptance from inspection of the completed improvement with
the County (including Structure #3092); said ordinance to be
passed with executing this agreement;
b. Accept the jurisdiction at the future date indicated in item
4a;
C. Assume maintenance of Camp McDonald Road from Rand Road to the
west right-of-way line of Mandel Lane upon written notice
from the County to do so following acceptance by Prospect
Heights and the County from inspection of the completed
improvement, including Structure #3092;
d. Recognize the terms of any existing intergovernmental agree-
ments concerning the exercise of the aforesaid jurisdiction and
maintenance over
1) the south half of Camp McDonald Road between Dale Avenue
and Elmhurst Road which lies within the corporate limits
of the Village of Mount Prospect,
2) the north half of Camp McDonald Road from McDonald Creek
to Wolf Road which lies within the corporate limits of the
Village of Wheeling
3) Camp McDonald Road ' between Rand Road and Dale Avenue,
which lies within the corporate limits of the Village of
Arlington Heights and will be subject to the jurisdiction
of the Village of Arlington Heights.
The Village of Arlington Heights will:
a. At the time it executes this agreement, pass the Ordinance,
Addendum #3 -AH, declaring intent to accept jurisdiction of
Camp McDonald Road from Rand Road to Dale Avenue upon accep-
tance of the completed improvement from inspection with the
County (said limits being the corporate limits of Arlington
Heights);
ADDENDUM #1 STIPULATIONS Page 3
b. Assume jurisdiction of Camp McDonald Road upon acceptance
from said inspection;
C. Consent to maintenance of Camp McDonald Road from Rand Road
to Dale Avenue by the City of Prospect Heights as in item
4c above, such consent conveyed by Arlington Heights
execution of this agreement.
6. The Village of Mount Prospect will by executing this agreement,
consent to the future maintenance and jurisdictional assumption
of Camp McDonald Road, south half, from Dale Avenue to Elmhurst
Road, by the City of Prospect Heights, the latter in the course
of obligations to be assumed by it herein. The Village shall
attach authorizing minutes for execution to each agreement copy.
7. The Village of Wheeling, by executing this agreement, will thus
consent to maintenance and assumption of jurisdiction of Camp
McDonald Road, north half, from McDonald Creek to Wolf Road by
the City of Prospect Heights, the latter in the course of obli-
gations to be assumed by it herein. The Village shall attach
Board minutes authorizing it.
This agreement shall be processed in six original copies, one
being for the Illinois Department of Transportation. When
effective, it shall bind the parties hereto, their successors
and assigns.
Maintenance by Prospect Heights
HE I u
Kneeling to consent to
Maintenance and Jurisdiction
of north half by Prospect Heights
_
o^ t
r' ,-°'
A
q Village of
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS
33 S. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD - ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 80005-1499 * (708) 253-2340
This is to certify that I, Edwina Corso, am the Village Clerk of
the Village of Arlington Heights, in the County of Cook, State of
Illinois, and as such am the custodian of the official records and
seal of said Village of Arlington Heights; and that the attached
is a,true and correctcopyof:
R92-003 Resolution approving an Agreement Between Cook County Hwy Dept. and
City of Prospect Hts and Village of Arlington.Hts. and City of Mount Prospect
and City of Wheeling concerning jurisdictional transfer of segment of Camp McDonald
Road
passed and approved by the President and Board of Trustees of said
Village of Arlington Heights at a meeting duly held on the
6 day of January , 19 92, all as appears from the
official records of the Village of Arlington Heights which are in
my custody.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Village of Arlington
Heights, this —18—day of January , 19 Q9 .
(OFFICIAL SEAL)
0
eo&wtlll� 310-�
Edwina Corso, Village Clark
T,' -,e City of I—Zoo,:7 Neigttcrs
Camp McDonald Road between Rand & Handel
for street improvement purposes
4.
BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF
THE VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS:
SECTION ONE: A certain local agency agreement
jurisdictional transfer by and between the Cook County Highway
Department, and the City of Prospect Heights, the Villages of
Arlington Heights, Mount Prospect and Wheeling, concerning the
transfer of jurisdiction of a segment of Camp McDonald Road for
street improvements between Rand Road and Mandel Lane, a true and
correct copy of which is attached hereto, be and the same is hereby
approved.
SECTION TWO: The Village President and Village Clerk are
hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf
of the Village of Arlington Heights.
SECTION THRkRl.-" This resolution shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law and said agreement shall be recorded with the
Recorder of Cook County, Illinois.
AYES: WALTON, STENGREN, HAYES, SCHROEDER, HAHN, WALSH, MnDER, DADAY, MAKI
NAYS: NONE
PASSED AND APPROVED this 6th day of January, 1992.
e,
V�illlgo-Pr`ssdent
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
AGREVIENTRES: CAMPNOOKALDROM/L10
0 ON
O Village of
a ca ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS
33 S. ARUNGTON HEIGHTS ROAD - ARUNGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005-1499 * (708) 253-2340
This is to certify that I, Edwina Corso, am the Village Clerk of
the Village of Arlington Heights, in the County of Cook, State of
Illinois, and as such am the custodian of the official records and
seal of said Village of Arlington Heights; and that the attached
is a true and correct copy of:
Ordinance 192-005 Approved 1/21/92 Concerning the Addition of Camp McDonald
Road between Rand Road and Dale Avenue to the Village of Arlington Heights
Street System
passed and approved by the President and Board of Trustees of said
Village of Arlington Heights at a meeting duly held on the
_Ll—day of January , 19_U—, all as appears from the
offici&l records of the Village of Arlington Heights which are in
my custody.
WITNESS my hand and the official seal of said Village of Arlington
Heights, this _28_day of JANUARY , 1992.
.
Edwina Corso, Village Clerk
(OFFICIAL SEAL) [rnM.njCx"T===
T,',,e Cd7ty of G-codA1ei-&cors
(01/21/92 - Legal #1) Consent Addition of a portion of Camp McDonald
Road between Rand and Dale to Village
jurisdiction
AN ORDINANC9 CONCERNING THE ADDITION Or
CAMP McDONAL12 ROAD BETWEEN THE LIMITS OP
RAND ROAD TO DALE AVENUE TO TR9 XVKCIPAL
STREET OYSTEM AT A FUTRES ME
WHEREAS, the Village of Arlington Heights and the County
of Cook are entering into an agreement for the improvement by the
county and transfer of jurisdiction of Camp McDonald Road from Rand
Road to Dale Avenue to the municipal street system of the Village
of Arlington Heights,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD
OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS:
SECTION ONE: That at such time as the Village of
Arlington Heights and County of Cook accept, from joint inspection,
certain improvements to the said part of Camp McDonald Road, with'
due written record having been made of said acceptance and
forwarded to the Illinois Department of Transportation, that Camp
McDonald Road, from Rand Road to Dale Avenue, shall then and
thereafter become a municipal street of the Village of Arlington
Heights and deleted from the County Highway System.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is directed to see
that a certified copy of this ordinance is attached as Addendum 03 -
AH to the agreement being entered into with the County of Cook (six
(6) copies of said agreement) and to forward all six (6) copies for
execution to the municipality indicated in the letter of
transmittal from the County concerning this agreement; further, to
file an additional certified copy with the Illinois Department of
Transportation for informational purposes.
AYES: MULDER, DADAY, WALSH, STENGREN, HAHN, SCHROEDER, WALTON, HAYES, MAK
NAYS: NONE
PASSED AND APPROVED this 21st day of January, 1992.
Village President
ATTEST:
e,.,- V, -
Village Clark
TRAFFICREGS:CAMPMCD(MALDROAD/LMB
C1 q o 6 -6 qQ- Los
CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
MUNICIPAL ORDINANCE NO._
Concerning the addition of Camp McDonald Road between the limits of Dale Avenue
to west right of way line of Mandel Lane to the municipal street system at a
future date:
Whereas, the City of Prospect Heights and the County of Cook are entering into
agreement for the improvement by the County and transfer of jurisdiction of
Camp McDonald Road from Dale Avenue to west right of way, Mandel Lane to the
municipal street system of this municipality;
Now Therefore, be it ordained that at such time as the City of Prospect Heights
and the County of Cook accept, from joint inspection, certain iz proverpants to
the said part of Camp McDonald Road, with due written record having been made of
said acceptance and forwarded to the Illinois Department of Transportation, that
Camp McDonald Road Fran Dale Avenue to the west right of way, Mandel Lane, shall
then and thereafter become a municipal street of this municipality, and deleted
from the County Highway System.
The Clerk of this municipality is directed to see that a certified copy of this
Ordinance is attached as Addendum #3 -PH to the agreement being entered into with
the County of Cook (six copies of said agreement) and to forward all six copies
for execution to the municipality indicated in the letter of transmir-tal from
the County concerning this agreement; further, to file an additional certified
copy with the Illinois Department of Transportation for informational purposes.
M.14A 131MINUM0
I, City Clerk in and for the city of Prospect Heights,
a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois and keeper of the records and
files of said municipality as provided by Statute, do hereby certify the fore-
going to be a true, perfect and complete copy of an Ordinance passed by the
City Council, City of Prospect Heights at its meeting held
an 1 19 .
Ira 7 -testimony whereof I haveheretoset my hand and affixed the seal of this
municipality at my office on the above date.
SEAL
City Clerk
ADDENDUN #3 -PH
STATE OF ILLINOIS
Ss
COUNTIES OF COOK AND LAKE
I, LOIS i, GAFFKE, do hereby certify that I am
the regularly elected and acting Clerk of the Village of Wheeling,
Cook and Lake Counties, Illinois.
I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the annexed and foregoing
document RESOLUTION NUMBER 89-176
is a true and correct copy of the document presented to the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Wheeling.
I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that the original document of
which the foregoing is a true copy, is entrusted to my care of
safe keeping and I am the keeper of the same.
I DO FURTHER CERTIFY that I am the keeper of the records,
journals, entries, resolutions, ordinances and documents of the
said Village of Wheeling.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the corporate seal of the Village of Wheeling, this 5th
day of JUNE I A.D. 19 90
VILLAGE CLERKOFTHE VILLAGE OF WHEELING
COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS
SEAL
RESOLUTION NUMBER Pi -/?<a
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE PRESIDENT
TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH COOK COUNTY
FOR THE JURISDICTIONAL TRANSFER AND MAINTENANCE
OF A PORTION OF CAMP MCDONALD ROAD
WHEREAS, The Cook County Highway Department has proposed to undertake cartain
improvements to Camp McDonald Road; and 1
WHEREAS, following completion of said improvements, Camp McDonald Road will
cease to be a County Highway and became a Municipal Street under separate and dis-
tinct municipal jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, a portion of the northern one-half of Camp McDonald Road lying wester-
ly of Wolf Road is currently located within the Village of Wheeling's corporate
limits and is included in the proposed Roadway Improvements; and
WHEREAS, it is deemed not to be in the best interest of the Village of Wheeling
to accept jurisdictional maintenance responsibilities for the northern half of a
segment of Camp McDonald Road; and
WHEREAS, The City of Prospect Heights, Illinois is desirous of accepting the
Jurisdictional transfer of that portion of Camp McDonald Road, currently located
within the Village of Wheeling, in order to resolve future maintenance proolems
associated with split roadway jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, Cook County has prepared a Jurisdictional Transfer agreement whereby
the Village of Wheeling will consent to the maintenance and assumption of jurisdic-
tion of the northern one-half of Camp McDonald Road, from Wolf Road to Camp McDonald
Creek by the City of Prospect Heights.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF WHEELING, COUNTIES OF COOK AND LAKE, STATE OF ILLINOIS, that the Village
President is authorized to execute the agreement for assent to transfer, as prepared
by the County of Cook, as attached hereto and made part of this resolution.
Trustee i✓7 -/ moved, seconded by Trustee d.E' i/Z G'.97 -c
that Resolution Number �f�p- l%�o be adopted.
Trustee Abruscato _ L�� _ _ _ Trustee Ratajczak /�ye
Trustee Altieri i Trustee Rogers ___
Trustee Hartman Trustee Whittington
ADOPTED this � day of 1989, by the President
and Board of Trustees of the Village of Wheeling, Illinois.
Sheila H. Schultz, Village president
ATTEST,
, �r
Lois J. Gaffke, Village Clark
MINUTES
OF THE
PRESIDENT, BOARD OF TRUSTEES
VILLAGE OF WHEELING
COOK AND LAKE COUNTIES, ILLINOIS
60090
NOVEMBER 6, 1969
CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL FOR ATTENDANCE The Regular meetingof
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of wheeling ng
was called to order at 8:00 p.m. by President Sheila H. Schultz.
Clerk Gaffke called the roll and the following trustees were
present:
Judy Abruscato Joseph Ratajczak
Anthony Altieri William Rogers
Elizabeth Hartman James Whittington
Also present were: Craig Anderson, village manager; Robert
Fialkowski, Director of Finance; James Rhodes, Village Attorney;
Michael Klitzke, Director of Community Development; Michael
Haeger, Chief of Police; and reporters from the Herald and the
Countryside.
CONSENT AGENDA - All items listed on the consent agenda are
considered to be routine by the Village Board and will be enacted
by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these
items unless a Board tember or citizen so requests, in which
event the item will be removed from the general order of business
and considered after al: other regular agenda items.
A. RESOLUTION No. 22=111 Authorizing the. Village Manager to
Accept Change Order Nos. 1, 2, 3 and 4 to the contract for
Residential Reha,bi;jt.aLicZ_ 0 eCt No. 89-1
B. RESOLUTION NO. t2=17f Authorizing the Village President to
Execute an Agreement with Cook County for the Jurisdictional
Transfer and Maintenance of a- Portion of
Camp McDonald Road
The Consent Agenda was -read inits entirety by Clerk Gaffke.
notion to pass the Consent Agenda was made by Trustee Hartman and
seconded by Trustee Abruscato.
On the roll call, the vote was:
AYES: 6 -Trustees, Whittington, Hartman, Abruscato
Altieri k Rogers
NAYS: 0
ABSENT: 0
Ratajczak/
e being six affirmative a, ve votes, the motion was passe
CHANGES TO THE AGENDA None
ADJOURNED: 10:34 p.m,
Lois J. Ga f1ke
Village Clerk
Approved t h i a. -70 -Day of 1989, by the
President and Board of Trustees.
Cnrt?ICATZ AS KEEPER OF RECORDS AND MIES-FUN Sb*" SU*
W --
STATE OF ILLINOIS,
COUNTY OF COOK
I. David D. Orr , County Clerk of Cook County,
in the State aforesaid and keeper of the records and files of said Cook county, do
hereby certify that The Board of Commissioners of The Cour of Cook, at their
regular meeting held on the date —indicated below,
passed the following resolution:
Resolved by the Board of Ccumissioners of Cook County, Illinois, an behalf of
The County of Cook, that Camp McDonald. Road from Rand Foad to West Right -of -Way
Line of Mandel lane is to cease as a County Highway and become a municipal street
under the separate and distinct jurisdictions of the Village of Arlington Heights
and the City of Prospect Heights, as described in the attached agreement to which
this resolution is marked Addendum #4, and that the municipalities are to accept
maintenance thereover as shown in said agreement, all subsequent to an inprovement
by the County Department of Highways and acceptance by the said municipalities from
inspection of the completed project, all subject to approval of the Illinois
Department of Transportation of this agreement and notification of said Department
of Transportation of said acceptances from final inspection;
all of which appears from the records and files of my office.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF I have hereunto set my hand and
affixed the Seal of said County at my office in the City of
Chicago in Said County. this
day oL — A D. 19—
Addendum #4, �cr OCAL