HomeMy WebLinkAbout4381_001lance No. 4399 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
ution No. 4-92
�•w� "°�,
i�r
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, ist Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center February 18, 1992
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skipe1 Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Corcoran
ALL
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, February 4, 1992
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S "REPORT
A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance creates a Class "S" liquor license
for the Retro Bistro Restaurant, 1744 West Golf Road (Exhibs _-,
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
(TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance establishes the prohibition of
parking on the east side of Maple Street between
Northwest Highway and Central Road. The Safety Exhibit B)
Commission recommends granting this amendment.
B. ZBA 78-V-91, 1710-84 West Golf Road, Mount Prospect
Commons Shopping Center
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1,710 - 1784 WEST GOLF ROAD
This Ordinance grants variations to allow a zero
foot sideyard setback rather than the required
10 feet; to allow a 83% lot coverage, rather than
the required 75,~ and, to allow 214 parking spaces,
rather than the required 215 parking spaces. The
Zoning Board of Appeals granting these requests (Exhibit C)
by a vote of 5-1.
C. ZBA 3-V-92, 909 Tower Lane
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 909 TOWER LANE
This Ordinance grants a variation to permit
a chimney to encroach into the required
side yard by 24 inches, rather than the
permitted 18 inches. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this variation by a vote
of 6-0. (Exhibit D)
D. ZBA 4-V-92, 106 North Emerson Street
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 106 NORTH EMERSON STREET
This Ordinance grants a variation to permit
a detached garage to be constructed 2-1/2 feet
from the side lot line rather than the
required 5 feet. The Zoning Board of "Appeals
recommended granting this variation by a vote
of 6-0. (Exhibit E)
E. ZBA 6-V-92, 1500 North River Road
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1500 NORTH RIVER ROAD
This Ordinance grants a variation to reduce
the required 30 foot front yard to 6 feet to
allow for the installation of a self-service
canopy over the existing gasoline pumps. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this variation by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit F)
F. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 3777 AND 4065, GRANTING A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
1600 BISHOP COURT
This Ordinance amends the Planned Unit
Development for the subject property to
permit two free standing signs on the perimeter
berm. The Sign Review Board voted 2-2 to
permit this sign. (Exhibit G)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE COUNTY
OF COOK RELATIVE TO THE H.O.M.E. INVESTMENT
PARTNERSHIP CONSORTIUM
(Exhibit H)
B. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT AND THE COUNTY OF COOK RELATIVE
TO THE H.O.M.E. INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
CONSORTIUM
(Exhibit J)
C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE
This Ordinance authorizes the sale of Fire
Engine 517 to the highest bidder. This
equipment is no longer useful to the Village.
(Exhibit K)
D. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 43-77
RELATIVE TO ESTABLISHING PROCEDURES AND COSTS
CONCERNED WITH THE CIRCULATION OF VARIOUS
VILLAGE AGENDAS OF THE VILLAGE
This Resolution establishes the cost for
persons placing an order to receive various
Village agendas and/or minutes. (Exhibit L)
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ARTICLE VIII ENTITLED "DEPARTMENT OF
POLICE" OF CHAPTER 4 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance establishes the position
of Property Custodian for the Police
Department and establishes procedures
for disposing of abandoned property. (Exhibit M)
F. Accept improvements installed in conjunction
with the new Wal-Mart building at the
Mount Prospect Shopping Plaza
G. Accept private improvements installed in
conjunction with the Showa Marine building.
H. Accept private improvements installed in
conjunction with the Busse Development,
2200 South Busse Road.
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Appeal from the decision of the Village
Manager to revoke the existing Business
License for the Sports Health Spa,
1657 South Busse Road.
B. 1st Change order for the Fire and
Police Station
C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A PROJECT
USE AGREEMENT (SWANCC) (Exhibit N)
D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE CREATING AN
MUNICIPAL WASTE SYSTEM (SWANNC) (Exhibit 0)
E. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Litigation
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FEBRUARY 4, 1992
CALL TO ORDER
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
7,711
ROLL CALL
14,131
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
3,933
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
11,482
Trustee George Clowes
66,360
Trustee Leo Floros
1,927
Trustee Paul Hoefert
168,159
Trustee Irvana Wilks
350
Absent: Trustee Mark Busse
-
INVOCATION
25,784
The invocation was given by Trustee Wilks.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
6,513
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
APPROVE
moved to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting
MINUTES
Mayor and Board of Trustees held January 21, 1992.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Cloves, Corcoran, Floros,
-
Hoefert, Wilks
16,500
Nays: None
41,603
Motion carried.
79,386
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
APPROVE BILLS
to approve the following list of bills:
958,336
General Fund $
511,140
Refusal Disposal Fund
7,711
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
14,131
Community Development Block Grant Fund
3,933
Illinois municipal Retirement Fund
11,482
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
66,360
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,927
Risk Management Fund
168,159
Vehicle Replacement Fund
350
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep. Fund
25,784
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
-
Fire & Police Building Const.
6,513
Flood Control Revenue Fund
3,357
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
16,500
Police Pension Fund
41,603
Firemen's Pension Fund
79,386
Benefit Trust Fund
$
958,336
Trustee Wilks stated that she would vote
to
approve the list of bills with the exception
of $766.40 listed for legal expenses.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran,
Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays; None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
PRESENTATION: State Representative David Harris presented Mayor
STATE REP. Farley with a copy of House Resolution No. 1486
DAVID HARRIS honoring Mount Prospect on the 75th Anniversary of
75TH ANNIVERSARY incorporation.
MAYOR ROTCHFORD, Mayor Rotchford of Prospect Heights and City Clerk
PROSPECT HEIGHTS Karen Pedersen, presented Mayor Farley with a
75 ANNIVERSARY Proclamation and plaque honoring Mount Prospect on the
75th Anniversary of incorporation.
SWANCC TRANSFER Richard Hendricks, 1537 Emmerson Lane, and
STATION representatives from the City of Des Plaines, expressed
their opposition to the proposal to establish a
transfer station in unincorporated Cook County, in the
general area of River and Central Roads.
Mayor Farley explained that, as a member of SWANCC, the
Village of Mount Prospect supports the proposed site
and also mentioned that hearings had been; held on this
subject and it would not be appropriate to conduct
another hearing at this time since it was not an item
scheduled to be discussed and notice had not been given
of this proposed discussion.
AMEND CH. 13 MAYORIS REPORT
CLASS "S" An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
LIQUOR LICENSE: create a Class 'IS" i liquor license for a new restaurant
RETRO BISTRO to be known as Retro Bistro, to be located at 1744 West
1744 GOLF ROAD Golf Road.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at
the next regular meeting of the Village Board, February
18, 1992.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 77 -SU -91 ZBA 77 -SU -91, Wal-Mart, Mount Prospect Plaza
WAL-MART An Ordinance was presented for second reading
MOUNT PROSPECT that would grant a Special Use to permit a
PLAZA 5' 10" diameter satellite antenna on the roof of their
new building, located within the Mount Prospect Plaza.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 7-0.
ORD.NO. 4395 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4395
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS WAL-MART LOCATED
WITHIN THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 79-V-91 ZBA 79-V-91, 2016 East Euclid Avenue
2016 E. EUCLID An Ordinance was presented for second reading
that would grant variations to permit a 5 foot building
setback from the interior lot line; a 15 foot building
setback from the rear property line; a parking lot
setback; and, allow a 78% lot coverage. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these variations.
Page 2 - February 4, 1992
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
for passage of ordinance No. 4396
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2016 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes,'Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the
Village Code to prohibit parking on that portion
of Maple Street between Northwest Highway and
Central Road, at any time. The safety Commission
had considered this amendment and recommended
approval.
This ordinance will be presented February 18th
for second reading.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 78-V-91, 1710-1784 West Golf Road
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a zero foot sideyard setback, rather than the
required 10 feet; to allow a 83% lot coverage,
rather than the required 75%; and, to allow 214
parking spaces, rather than the required 215.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by a vote of 5-1.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the variations
requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented February 18th for
first reading.
ZBA 3-V-92, 909 Tower Lane
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a chimney to encroach into the required side yard
by 24 inches, rather than the permitted 18 inches.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented February 18th for
first reading.
Page 3 - February 4, 1992
ORD,.NO. 4396
AMEND CH. 18
MAPLE STREET
PARKING
ZBA 78-V-91
1710-84 GOLF
ZBA 3-V-92
909 TOWER LANE
ZBA 4-V-92 ZBA 4-V-92, 106 North Emerson Street
106 N.EMERSON The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit a
detached garage to be constructed 2-1/2 feet from the
side lot line, rather than the required 5 feet. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved'to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variation requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Notion carried.
An ordinance will be presented February 18th for first
reading.
ZBA 6-V-92
ZBA 6-V-92, 1500 North River Road
1500 N.RIVER RD
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to reduce the
required 30 foot front yard to 6 feet to allow for the
installation of a self-service canopy over the existing
gasoline pumps. The Zoning Board of Appeals,
recommended granting this request.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variation requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented February 18th for first
reading.
GENERAL
An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
OBLIGATION
authorize the issuance of General obligation Bonds in
BONDS
the amount $4.7 million.
David Jepson, Finance Director, noted that the interest
rates are approximately 5% and this would be
appropriate action at the lowest cost.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4397
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4397
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF
$4,475,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS,
SERIES 1492A AND $225,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION
BONDS, SERIES 1992B, OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 - February 4, 1992
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH.18
would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) by creating
NORTH WILLS
a commuter parking lot on Village owned property
STREET
on the west side of Wille Street just north of
PARKING LOT
Northwest Highway, known as the North Wille Lot.
It was noted that this parking lot will be
a metered lot, with the cost of $1.00 for a 12
hour period. This lot will provide 80 spaces.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll ca4l: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes,
ORD.NO. 4398
moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4398
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC
CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented to amend the Planned AMEND ORD.
Unit Development located in the northeast portion NOS. 3777
of the Kensington Center for Business to allow two 4065
free standing signs on the perimeter berms. The
Sign Review Board recommendation on this request
was a 2-2 vote. This Planned Unit Development site
plan does not indicate sign locations on the berms.
It was explained that NTN Bearing had complied
with the requirements of the Sign Code, however,
during the review process it was noted that the
proposed location would place the sign on the
berm. Staff noted that the Sign Code does
not prohibit signs on berms, but that swas
concerned about signs on those berms b U that
area.is a landscape buffer from the adii Phing street's.
Staff stated that NTN Bearing has agreed to lower
the height of the sign to 7.8 feet to reduce the
impact of the signs on the berms.
Several residents expressed their concerns relative
to allowing signs on the berm around this
industrial park. It was noted that there are no
residential dwellings adjacent to this property.
Members of the Board expressed concern that
other businesses within the Kensington Center
for Business would request permits to place
signs on the berm along Kensington Road. It
was also suggested that the Sign Code be
amended to specifically define placement of
signs on berms.
Page 5 - February 4, 1992
M
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
approve the request to amend Ordinance No. 3777,
granting the Planned Unit Development for the subject
EMPLOYEE A request was presented to renew the contract with
ASSISTANCE CompPsych, as part of the Northwest Municipal
PROGRAM (EAP) Conference Consortium, to provide the Employee
Assistance Program (EAP). This program offers initial
consultations for employees and/or their immediategy
family for various' emotional, financial and substance
abuse problems. The cost for this program is $19.50
a month per employee for a total of $6,655.74, based
on 273 employees. The proposed renewal would cover the
period through May, 1, 1993.
It was noted that 20 Village employees or their family
members had used the program during the existing
contract period. It was-"odwr was-"o"ooted that since this
program operates on a confidential basis, it is
difficult to determine if it is cost effective.
COMPPSYCH Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with administration and authorize renewing the
contract with CompPsych for the Employee Assistance
Program (EAP) at a cost not to exceed $6,655.74.
Upon roll call: Ayes': Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - February 4, 1992
property.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert,
Wilks, Farley
Nays: Clowes
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the
next meeting of the 'Village Board on February 18th.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
WAIVE BIDS:
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
WATER SYSTEM
following proposal,, ,continued from the January 21st
CONTROL PANEL
meeting in order to 'obtain additional information,
to waive the bidding procedure and authorize the
purchase of specialized software for the water
system control panel for the Village's water system.
Administration recommends the purchase of the needed
software from J. M. Process Systems, Inc. in the amount
of $35,064.00.
It was noted that the existing software was used when
obtained by the Village and therefore parts are no
longer available.
J.M.PROCESS
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
SYSTEM
concur with the recommendation of the administration
to waive the bidding process and authorize the purchase
of specialized software for the Village's water system
control panel at a cost not to exceed $35,064.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes': Clowes, Floros, Hoefert,
Wilks
Nays`: Corcoran
Motion carried.
EMPLOYEE A request was presented to renew the contract with
ASSISTANCE CompPsych, as part of the Northwest Municipal
PROGRAM (EAP) Conference Consortium, to provide the Employee
Assistance Program (EAP). This program offers initial
consultations for employees and/or their immediategy
family for various' emotional, financial and substance
abuse problems. The cost for this program is $19.50
a month per employee for a total of $6,655.74, based
on 273 employees. The proposed renewal would cover the
period through May, 1, 1993.
It was noted that 20 Village employees or their family
members had used the program during the existing
contract period. It was-"odwr was-"o"ooted that since this
program operates on a confidential basis, it is
difficult to determine if it is cost effective.
COMPPSYCH Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with administration and authorize renewing the
contract with CompPsych for the Employee Assistance
Program (EAP) at a cost not to exceed $6,655.74.
Upon roll call: Ayes': Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - February 4, 1992
A Resolution was presented expressing the intent
AMERICANS
of the Village of Mount Prospect to comply with
WITH
the newly adopted federal regulations governing
DISABILITIES
Americans With Disabilities.
ACT
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks,,iW#;.*A
RES.NO.3-92
moved for passage of Resolution No. 3-92
A RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO COMPLIANCE
WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
PURCHASE
Kays: None
ALDI
Motion carried.
PROPERTY
A request was presented to waive the bidding
WAIVE BIDS:
procedure and authorize trading in a Font
CABLE T.V.
500 character generator owned by the Village
EQUIPMENT
for operating the Cable T.V. Division and
BUDGET
obtain upgraded equipment.
HEARINGS
It was noted that while the Village has owned
this equipment for some time, it has been in
storage waiting for additional equipment.
Another client would like to have this equipment
and Roscor has made a commitment to the Village
to replace this equipment with an upgraded
version. The original cost of this equipment
exceeded $4,000.00.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes,
ROSCOR
moved to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and authorize trading in a
Font 500 character generator for upgraded
equipment from Roscor.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Kays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Dixon informed the Village Board that the
PURCHASE
purchase of the former Aldi's property (Chang
ALDI
Property) had been accomplished on February 3rd.
PROPERTY
The Village Manager mentioned that the Lincoln
AUDITORIUM
Jr. High Auditorium,Committee had met earlier,
MEETING
in the day.
The budget hearings for the 1992/93 budget will
BUDGET
begin at the Finance Commission meeting on
HEARINGS
Thursday, February 6th at 7:30 P.M.
Mayor Farley and the Board expressed appreciation
75TH
to the Public Works Director and staff for all
ANNIVERSARY:
their assistance in providing and maintaining
DOWNTOWN
the lights throughout downtown area in conjunction
LIGHTS
with the 75th Anniversary celebration.
Appreciation was also expressed to Cheryl Pasalic
75TH
and the Cable T.V. crew for providing the 15 minute
ANNIVERSARY
documentary on the history of the Village.
DOCUMENTARY
Page 7 - February 4, 1992
ADJOURNMENT
ADJOURN There being no further business to come before the
Board, Mayor Farley declared the meeting adjourned at
10:55 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 8 - February 4, 1992
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
February 13, 1992
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
2/01/92 through
Per Attached
Journal
Balance
2/01/92
2/13/92
List of Bills
Entry
2/13/92
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,418,875
$212,225
$, 576,931
<177,000>
$ 877,169
Refuse Disposal Fund
<142,138>
22,281
5,385
126,000
758
Motor Fuel Tax
474,735
1,735
6,191
470,279
3,622
Community Development Block Grant Fund
134
7,491
7,000
10,457
3,512
68,738
51,000
210
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,275,268
147,761
403,422
3,019,607
179,700
Parking System Revenue
178,932
5,039
4,271
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
941,191
15,215
70,898
593
885,508
446,103
Vehicle Replacement Fund
446,661
35
Capital Pra ects
Capital Improvement Fund
1,401,745
38,743
1,273,660
166,828
333,120
Downtown Redev Const Funds
Police & Fire Building Construction
327,842
5,865,906
5,340
1,583
62
135,353
5,732,136
Flood Control Construction Fund
1,470,703
58,569
37,078
1,992,194
Debt Service Funds
753,485.
2,957
4,195
752,247
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
11,542
4,529
11,561
13,062
58,025
3,009
1-,407;871
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
1,454,335
16,869,997
11,161
-
16,881,158
Firemen's Pension Fund
18,857,868
10,914
164
-
2 b7
18,868,782
243,016
Benefit Trust Funds
245,019
$54,359,591
567 269
$2,663,543
Ste-
$52,263,317
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
A & H ENTERTAINERS, INC.
ACTION VENDING
ALTER ASSET MANAGEMENT
BEN'S PLUMBING
BERGEN CONSTRUCTION CORP.
DAVID BLACK
CABLE SYSTEMS
KEN CARTER
V.J. CENTRACCHIO & SON INC.
CHANGE FUND - PUBLIC WORKS
CAROL CHRISTIAN
CITIBANK,N.A.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
CONCEPT MANAGEMENT
CONCRETE & STEEL
CROSSTOWN ELECTRIC
DELUXE SIGNS
STEVEN DESPOD
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
DUMAS WALKER
ESTATE OF HAROLD J. BANNASCH
FLETCHER ENGINEERING COMPANY
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
OVERPMT GAME MACHINES
$150.00
$150.00
RETURNED LICENSE
$20.00
$20.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$56.70
$100.00
$56.70
$100.00
C10360 BENS PLBG
NUISANCE ABATEMENT
$13,209.00
$13,209.00
C10173 BLACK
C10174 BLACK
$100.00
$100.00
$200.00
C10082 CABLE SYSTEMS
C10185 CABLE SYSTEMS
$100.00
$100.00
$200.00
C10312 CARTER
$100.00
$100.00
C10308 VJ CENTRACCHIO
$100.00
$100.00
REFUSE STICKERS FUND
$50.00
$15.00
$50.00*
$15.00
STICKER OVERPMT
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS
$1,276.63
$1,276.63*
PMT P/R 2/6
$224.25
$414.12
$224.25*
REFUND WATER BILL CREDIT
REFUND WATER BILL CREDIT
$41.76
$455.88
C9964 CONCRETE & STEEL
C9983 CONCRETE & STEEL
$75.00
$50.00
$125.00
1452 CROSSTOWN ELECTRIC
$100.00
$100.00
1474 DELUXE SIGNS
$100.00
$100.00
C10216 DESPOD
C10216 DESPOD
$100.00
$10.00
$110.00
P/R ENDING 2/6/92
$386,800.28
P/R ENDING 2/6/92
$1,051.37
P/R ENDING 2/6/92
$728.58
P/R ENDING 2/6/92
$35,218.06
P7R ENDING 2/6/92
$1,442.31
P/R ENDING 2/13/92
$4,777.10
P/R ENDING 2713/92
$81,655.18
$511,672.88*
C 875 DUMAS WALKERS
$475.00
$475.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$6.02
$60.06
$66.08
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$500.00
$500.00
JAN 92 DEP CARE REIMB
JAN 92 MED BENEFIT REIMB
$1,220.44
$11.,841.35
$13,061.79*
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
G B SPRINKLERS
GEISER-BERNER
GENCON BLDG. CORP.
PATRICIA N. GESICKI
GERARDO GRIECO
GUARANTEED HOME IMP., INC.
TONY GUARISCO PLBG.
HELLER, SHAPIRO & FRISONE
THOMAS HELLER
HEWLETT PACKARD
GREG IGNARSKI
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
GLENN H. JOHNSON
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
CHANG H. KIM
EDWARD N. KUSCEVICH
LA ROSITA GROCERIES
LAKE -COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY
M -K SIGNS, INC.
M -R JAMES CRAFT SERVICE
T. G. MAVRAKIS
MCLENNAN & THEBAULT, INC.
JOSEPH MEZZANO
MR. BEEF & PIZZA
NATIONAL SIGNS INC.
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C9689 GB SPRINKLERS
$100.00
$100.00
C9326 GEISER BERNER
$100.00
$100.00
C8661 GENCON BLDG
$290.00
$290.00
REIMB FEB HLTH INS
$161.50
$161.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$18.66
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.82
$20.48
C10272 GUARANTEED HOME
$20.00
$20.00
C10365 GUARISCO
$100.00
$100.00
WAGE DEDUCTION 85M102858
$881.00
$881.00-
C8256 HELLER
$75.00
$75.00
PRODUCT MTCE
$561.00
$561.00
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$2.40
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$2.62
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$23.80
$28.82
EMPLOYEE SHARE JAN 92
$16,445.09
EMPLOYER SHARE JAN 92
$41,258.69
$57,703.78*
C8014 JOHNSON
$475.00
$475.00
PMT P/R 2/6
$254.00
$254.00*
C9834 KIMM
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
C10221 LAROSITA GROCERIES
$75.00
$75.00
GASOLINE
$7,116.00
$7,116.00
1434 M -K SIGNS
$75.00
1444 MK SIGNS
$100.00
$175.00
C10252 M -R JAMES
$100.00
$100.00
C10035 T.G.MAVRAKIS
$500.00
$500.00
NUISANCE ABATEMENT
$2,058.00
$2,058.00
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$3.93
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$14.28
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$1.44
$19.65
C6018 MR BEEF & PIZZA
$450.00
$450.00
1385 NATIONAL SIGNS
$75.00
1480 NATIONAL SIGN
$100.00
$175.00
SAVINGS BONDS PR 2/06
$350.00
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 2/6
$11,034.34
DUE TO FED DEP P/R 2/6
$79.46
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
OPUS
PALDO SIGN & DISPLAY CO.
HELEN LYNN PATE
PECK/JONES CONSTRUCTION
LEONARD J. PETRUCELLI
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PIERCE BUILDERS
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTMASTER
Q.T. SIGN COMPANY
CONSTRUCTION CO.
W CORP.
REFLECTIONS
ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO.
KATHRYN L. ROSS
ROUSE RANDHURST CORPORATION
RUEFFER STAMP WORKS
LUIS SEGURA
PAUL SKORDILIS
STATE OF ILLINOIS
BRIAN STEDLER
STEELE & LOEBER
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2113%92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
DUE TO
FED DEP P1R 216
$55.28
DUE TO
FED DEP P1R 216
$2,651.23
DUE TO
FED DEP P1R 216
$1,231.35
DUE TO
FED DEP PfR 216
$118.71
$15,520.37*
C10182
OPUS NORTH
$450.00
C8263
OPUS NORTH
$500.00
$950.00
1458
PALDO SIGN
$100.00
1459
PALDO SIGN CO
$100.00
$200.00
PATE SUBDIVISION
$27,064.00
$27,064.00*
C10117
PECKZJONES
$500.00
C10335
PECK/,JONES
$100.00
C10344
PECK/JONES
$100.00
$700.00
REFUND
FINALL WATER BILL
$9.52
REFUND
FINAL WATER BILL
$.96
$10.48
MISC EXPENSES
$5.00
$5.00*
C8831
JE PIERCE
$100.00
$100.00
POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT
$3,000.00
$3,000.00*
POSTAGE STAMPS
$580.00
$580.00*
1475
QT SIGN
$100.00
$100.00
C9645
RC CONST
$75.00
$75.00
C10260
RAC CORP
$100.00
C10341
RAC CORP
$100.00
$200.00
1466
REFLECTIONS
$75.00
$75.00
C10254
AJ ROGERS
$100.00
C10281
AJ ROGERS
$100.00
C10339
AJ ROGERS
$100.00
C8565
AJ ROGERS
$100.00
C8566
AJ ROGERS
$100.00
$500.00
REFUND
STICKER PURCHASE
$20.00
$20.00
C6959
ROUSE RANDHURST
$245.00
$245.00
1445
RUEFFER STAMP
$100.00
$100.00
STICKER OVERPMT
$10.00
$10.00
C10372
SKORDILIS-
$100.00
$100.00
LIQUOR
AFP RECORD CK
$70.00
$70.00*
C10080
STEDLER
$75.00
$75.00
C9518
STEELE & LOEBER
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING
ACCOUNTS
SUNRISE
RESTAURANT
1438 SUNRISE REST
$50.00
$50.00
THIRD DISTRICT
CIRCUIT COURT
920201 BOND MONEY
$1,570.00
920206 BOND MONEY
$1,850.00
920210 BOND MONEY
$250.00
920211 BOND MONEY
$900.00
$4,570.00*
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$1,401.84
$1,401.84
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
C10080 BRAIN STEDLER
$25.00
C10182 OPUS NORTH
$50.00
C10221 LAROSITA GROC
$25.00
C6018 MR BEEF & PIZZA
$50.00
C6959 ROUSE RANDHURST
$255.00
C8014 GLENN H JOHNSON
$25.00
C8256 THOMAS HELLER
$25.00
C8661 GENCON BLDG
$210.00
C9645 RC CONST CO
$25.00
C9875 DUMAS WALKER
$25.00
C9964 CONCRETE & STEEL
$25.00
1385 NATIONAL SIGNS
$25.00
1434 M.K.SIGNS INC
$25.00
1438 SUNRISE
$50.00
1441 VINCENT SIGN CO
$25.00
1466 REFLECTIONS
$25.00
$890.00
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO RISK MGMT FUND
$36,900.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$25,158.52
TR TO RISK MGMT FUND
$450.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$4,194.97
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$1,500.00
$68,203.49
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TR TO IMRF FUND
$6,672.93
TR TO IMRF FUND
$260.91
TR TO IMRF FUND
$0,224.95
TR TO IMRF FUND
$164.52
TR TO IMRF FUND
$363.83
$15,687.14
VINCENT
SIGN SERVICE
1440 VINCENT SIGN
$100.00
1441 VINCENT SIGN
$75.00
1471 VINCENT SIGN
$100.00
$275.00
ROSE M.
ZAK
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$16.66
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CERTIFIED REPORTING COMPANY
ILLINOIS FIRE & POLICE COMM.
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SCHWEPPE & SONS
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
GENERAL FUND
SYMPATHY FLOWERS
REFUND FINAL WATER
BILL
$1.68
$18.34
RICHARD ZINKUS
C8879 ZINKUS
$157.25
$100.00
$100.00
$175.00
$175.00
NWMC HOLIDAY RECEPTION
***TOTAL**
$754,918.10
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
$129.79
MISC EXPENSES
$95.99
40.12
$34.75
GENERAL FUND
$489,138.58
$1,391.74
REFUSE DISPOSAL
ILL. MUNICIPAL
FUND
RETIREMENT FUND
$1,924.85
$68,738.12
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$114,106.29
PARKING SYSTEM
REVENUE FUND
$2,898.38
WATER & SEWER FUND
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$1,438.13
POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & I 1991A
$4,194.97
$58,025.25
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$13,061.79
ESCROW DEPOSIT
FUND
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CERTIFIED REPORTING COMPANY
ILLINOIS FIRE & POLICE COMM.
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SCHWEPPE & SONS
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
GENERAL FUND
SYMPATHY FLOWERS
$78.00
$68.00
$146.00
SYMPATHY FLOWERS
75TH ANN COMM ROLLS
$6.48
$6.48
SERVICES RENDERED
$157.25
$157.25
IFPCA DUES 1992
$175.00
$175.00
NWMC HOLIDAY RECEPTION
$60.00
$60.00*
MISC EXPENSES
$129.79
MISC EXPENSES
$95.99
40.12
$34.75
$265.90*
MISC EXPENSES
$
$34.75
COFFEE
***TOTAL**
$845.38
$845.38
VENDOR
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY
JENNIFER CALI
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
JOHN F. DIXON
THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P.
GREGORY FRANKS
HEWLETT PACKARD
HOUSE OF RENTAL
ICMA
LAUREL JEAN MYERS, CSC
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ED SHIRLEY & SONS SPORTS
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
XEROX CORP.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
$50.00
$50.00
SUBPOENA FEE
$30.00
$30.00*
SUBSCRIPTION
$52.50
$52.50
EXPENSES
$100.92
$100.92
SAVINGS BOND BOESCHE
$50.00
$50.00
SUBPOENA FEE
$30.00
$30.00*
PRODUCT MICE
$63.00-
$63.00
SUPPLIES
$73.30
$73.30
REGISTER-DIXON
$75.00
$75.00
SERVICES -SIGN LANGUAGE
$56.00
$56.00
SUPPLIES
$10.02
SUPPLIES
$110.46
$120.48
MISC EXPENSES
$21.15
MISC EXPENSES
$15.76
$36.91*
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$68.57
$68.57*
DUES/MEALS-DIXON
$183.00
$183.00
RETIREMENT GIFT MCKILLOP
$250.00
$250.00*
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,054.90
$1,054.90
1048 COPIER MTCE
$225.38
FUSER LUBRICANT
$25.00
$250.38
***TOTAL**
$2,418.96
$2,418.96
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AT&T
DUPONT PLAZA HOTEL
EDWARD FRANCE
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
PASALIC EXPENSES LODGING
COMM ASST COW MTG
SERVICE
SERVICE
$494.53
$358.68
$15.00
$50.00
$2,152.41
$494.53
$358.68
$15.00
$2,202.41
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
JOHN KEANE
COMM ASST BD MTG
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
MELANIE KRUPP
MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIONS -INC.
AIRFARE-PASALIC
$238.00
$125.00
$238.00
$125.00
NATOA%NLC
REGISTER PASALIC
MEMBERSHIP SANBORN
$60.00
$60.00
NFLCP
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
68.69
$14.00
$82.69*
ROSCOR CORPORATION
EQUIPMENT
COMM ASST COW MTG
$3,995.00
$25.00
$3,995.00
$25.00
FRANK SMITH
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
OFFICE FURNITURE
306.00
$184.00
$490.00
OFFICE FURNITURE
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$8,136.31
GENERAL FUND
$8,136.31
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ALPHAGRAPHICS
CREDIT
SUPPLIES
$10.00 -
$128.80
$118.80
AMBASSADOR OFFICE EQUIP., INC.
CARTRIDGE
$85.26
$85.26
$170.52
HEWLETT PACKARD
CARTRIDGE
PRODUCT MTCE
$63.00-
$63.00
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
MTCE COMPUTERS7PRINTER
$194.00
$52.00
$246.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
JAN 92 TR TAX TRANSACTIONS
$7.58
$290.00
$7.58
$290.00
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$59.45
$12.62
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$12.14
MISC EXPENSES
$10.30
$94.51*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$120.76
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
TRACS
V & G PRINTERS INC.
XEROX CORP.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CREDIT SUPPLIES
DELIVERY
FEBRUARY CONNECT FEE
BUDGET COVERS
1048 COPIER MICE
DRY INK
FUSER LUBRICANT
$3,164.22
INVOICE AMOUNT
$41.90
$548.00
$55.81
$3.99
$30.52
$89.35
$185.28
$377.10
$4.02
$41.90-
$23.60
$50.00
$234.00
$225.38
$327.00
$25.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 8
TOTAL
$1,414.83
$23.60
$50.00
$234.00
$577.38
$3,164.22
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
HEWLETT PACKARD
INTERNATIONAL AUDIO, INC.
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
PRODUCT MTCE
PACE 120 CASSETTES
PAPER
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
LEGAL NOTICE
MISC EXPENSES
$63.00-
$63.00
$145.95
$145.95
$227.85
$227.85*
$160.54
$254.72
$415.26
$63.30
$63.30
$32.05
$32.05*
***TOTAL**
$821.41
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL'
GENERAL FUND $821.41
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
BROOKFIELD
FEB EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM
FEB EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM
$1,626.88
$10,351.28
MED CLAIMS THRU 217
$52,216.98
$64,195.14*
CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS.
RISK MGMT SVCS
SERVICE FEES
$500.00
$886.00
$500.00
$886.00
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
REIMBURSEMENT
$469.00
$469.00
DELORES HILLERTZ
MEDICAL FACULTY
FULL & FINAL SETTLEMENT
SERVICES CANNING
$263.37
$860.25
$263.37
$860.25
NORTHWESTERN
NORTHWESTERN RADIOLOGY GROUP
SERVICES -CANNING
$449.25
$1,837.28
$449.25
$1,837.28
SCHWAB REHABILITAION CENTER
SERVICES VINCENZO
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
***TOTAL**
$69,460.29
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$69,460.29
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIA
REFERENCE MATERIAL
ADVANCE EXPENSES
$24.95
$595.00
$24.95
$595.00
WILLIAM L. AMUNDSEN
CDW COMPUTER CENTERS
NETWORK & SOFTWARE
106.00
NETWORK & SOFTWARE
$1,210.00
NETWORK & SOFTWARE
$653.00
CR -NETWORK & SOFTWARE
$210.00 -
CR -NETWORK & SOFTWARE
$2,106.00 -
SUPPLIES
$58.00
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$285.00
SUPPLIES
$51.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
SUPPLIES
$46.00 -
COMPUTER SERVICE FEE
$130.00
$2,131.00
COMPUTER SHOPPER
SUBSCRIPTION
$14.99
$14.99
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
INSP REPORTS & ENVELOPES
$129.00
$129.00
MICHAEL FRONTZAK
EXPENSES
$218.75
$218.75
LES HANNEMAN
EXPENSES
$71.00
71.00*
HEWLETT PACKARD
PRODUCT MTCE
$63.00-
63.00
IAFSM
MEMBERSHIP VANDORNICK
$20.00
$20.00
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE
$130.00
$130.00
INSET SYSTEMS
SOFTWARE UPGRADE
$32.00
$32.00
DAN JAKES
EXPENSES
$69.00
$69.00*
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$52.20
$52.20
MOTOROLA, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$127.50
$127.50
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$38.67
SUPPLIES
$152.69
$191.36
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$12.63
MISC EXPENSES
$38.00
MISC EXPENSES
$45.20
MISC EXPENSES
$27.00
MISC EXPENSES
$19.93
MISC EXPENSES
$5.00
MISC EXPENSES
$28.14
$175.90*
SUBURBAN BRANCH A.P.W.A.
SEMINARS
$125.00
$125.00
SUBURBAN BUILDING OFFICIALS CO
REGISTRATION FEES
$50.00
REGISTRATION FEES
$250.00
$300.00
JOE TEDESCO
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$18.00
$18.00
FREDRIC TENNYSON
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$136.91
$136.91
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$17.68
SUPPLIES
$130.43
CREDIT SUPPLIES
$2.40-
$145.71
V & G PRINTERS INC.
BUSINESS CARDS WULBECKER
$39.00
$39.00
WINDOWS MAGAZINE
SUBSCRIPTION
$19.97
$19.97
XEROX CORP.
2510 COPIER MTCE
$75.00
1035 COPIER MTCE
$157.25
1048 COPIER MTCE
$225.37
DEVELOPER
$149.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2113%92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
FUSER LUBRICANT $25.00 $631.62
INSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL** $5,335.86
GENERAL FUND $5,335.86
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALEXANDER BATTERY CO., INC.
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
CARLIN & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
CLASSLINE, INC.
D-TECTOR, INC.
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TED GORSKI
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
BATTERIES
$1,104.00
BATTERIES
$141.75
$1,245.75
REGISTER-ANDLER
$129.00
$129.00
SERVICE
$347.67
$347.67
PHOTO REPRINTS
$60.30
$60.30
TOP NAME PLATE SCHMIDT
$7.00
$7.00
CO BADGES
$21.25
$21.25
FAX PAPER
$44.00
$44.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
TIRES
$1,033.00
TIRES
$189.00
$1,300.00
EXPENSES
$26.04
$26.04
SERVICE
$32.65
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$100.00
SERVICE
$19.19
SERVICE
$21.87
$473.71
PARTS
$103.29
PARTS
$27.56
PARTS
$22.50
PARTS
18.23
PARTS
$109.30
PARTS
.$64.14
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2113192
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PARTS
$14.86
PARTS
$76.50
PARTS
$40.66
PARTS
$27.80
PARTS
$8.03
$512.87
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$128.14
CREDIT
$75.00-
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$25.85
$78.99
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
CREDIT SUPPLIES
$52.46-
SUPPLIES
$121.00
SUPPLIES
$242.00
SUPPLIES
$75.08
SUPPLIES
$28.66
SUPPLIES
$18.38
$432.66
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$87.28
PARTS
$16.31
PARTS
$70.97
$174.56
MINUTEMAN PRESS
ABANDONED AUTO REPORTS
$192.92
$192.92
RICHARD MULLER
EXPENSES
$51.04
$51.04
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
TUITION RECKERIBELMONTE
$730.00
$730.00
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$7.34
MISC EXPENSES
$9.60
MISC EXPENSES
$66.10
MISC EXPENSES
$17.64
MISC EXPENSES
$18.76
MISC EXPENSES
$2.30
MISC EXPENSES
$26.00
MISC EXPENSES
$20.00
MISC EXPENSES
$7.00
$174.74*
ERIC E. PIEE
RADIO REPAIRS
$533.00
$533.00
RAPP'S
PARTS
$59.46
PARTS
$134.40
PARTS
$188.16
$382.02
JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES
POLYGRAPH EXAMS
$270.00
$270.00
SANGAMON STATE UNIVERSITY
DUI LAW VHS VIDEOTAPE
$15.00
$15.00
SECRETARY OF STATE
RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
$240.00
$240.00
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC.
DON ANDERSON
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
ARTISTIC EXECUTIVE AWARDS
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
DOLTON FIRE EQUIP SALES, INC.
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
FIREHOUSE
JAMES FLORY - F.D.
GFE, INC
H R HART PHOTO
EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$322.78
PAGE 13
15.64
$66.26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
LINEN SERVICE
$42.88
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
$41.06
$39.47
$123.41
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
$158.28
BA77-JT-2404-A
$9.03
STATE OF ILLINOIS
LIQUOR APP RECORD CK
$10.00
$15.00
$1.0.00*
$15.00
STATE'S ATTORNEYS APPELLATE PR
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
COMPUTER CLEANING SUPPLIES
$100.96
$100.96
THE TEXWIPE COMPANY
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
P LOCKUP/FOOD
$$26.24
$128.25
JOSEPH ZIOLKOWSKI
EXPENSES
$26.04
$26.04
POLICE DEPARTMENT
$81.24
$42.14
***TOTAL**
$7,722.77
GENERAL FUND
$7,722.77
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC.
DON ANDERSON
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
ARTISTIC EXECUTIVE AWARDS
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
DOLTON FIRE EQUIP SALES, INC.
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
FIREHOUSE
JAMES FLORY - F.D.
GFE, INC
H R HART PHOTO
EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
$237.89
$84.89
$322.78
COPIES
SUPPLIES
15.64
$66.26
$81.90
LINEN SERVICE
$42.88
LINEN SERVICE
LINEN SERVICE
$41.06
$39.47
$123.41
ENGRAVE RADIO EQUIPMENT
$85.80
$364.56
$85.80
$364.56
MAINTENANCE
070 0057060 0
$158.28
$158.28
BA77-JT-2404-A
$9.03
$9.03
EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
215.15
$2,653.54
$2,868.69
CERTIFICATES MPFD
$164.00
$164.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$21.97
$21.97
EXPENSES
$20.00
$20.00
SAFETY GOGGLES
SAFETY GOGGLES
$24.12
$34.49
$58.61
PHOTO SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$81.24
$42.14
$123.38
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
INDUSTRIAL FIRE PROT.CNSLTNTS.
INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL MGMT.
BRIAN IPSEN
KAR PRODUCTS INC
KREST UNIFORMS, INC.
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MACACADEMY
MARV'S APPLIANCE SERVICE
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
MQS INSPECTION, INC.
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
NATIONAL FIRE PRCT. ASSOC.
NORTHEAST ILL. EMERGENCY MGMT.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
P4YMENT DATE 2/13/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SERVICE
$331.50
SERVICE
$400.00
SERVICE
$89.67
$821.17
REGISTER KUEKING
$300.00
REGISTER ESCONDO
$300.00
$600.00
REGISTER JULIANO/KORDECKI
$200.00
REGISTER MALCOLM/AMBER
$200.00
$400.00
TECHNICAL SVCS
$77.00
$77.00
REIMBURSEMENT
$783.00
$783.00
SUPPLIES
$384.51
$384.51
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$70.00
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$67.85
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$60.00
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$54.04
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$69.15
$321.04
PARTS
$79.81
$79.81
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$26.70
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$27.75
$54.45
VIDEO TAPES
$134.90
$134.90
REPAIR OVEN
$87.00
$87.00
RIBBONS
$226.59
$226.59
INSPECTIONS
$184.00
$184.00
PARTS
$19.57
PARTS
$25.35
PARTS
$44.22
PARTS
$34.79
PARTS
$53.86
CREDIT PARTS
$5.79 -
PARTS
$87.75
PARTS
$159.76
PARTS
$18.69
PARTS
$4.20
PARTS
$39.00
$481.40
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$44.50
$44.50
MEMBERSHIPS
$325.00
$325.00
SUPPLIES
.$59.89
$59.89
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
R & R UNIFORMS INC.
SCHWAAB, INC.
SECRETARY OF STATE
645 ELECTRONIC DISTR; CORP.
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2%1392
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$29.05
$29.05
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$14.17
COFFEE SUPPLIES
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$5.27
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$5.80
$281.64
$3.00
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$22.97
$27.00
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$5.00
PAGER BATTERIES
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$8.00
COMMUNITY CAB CO.
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$22.00
$411.00
$249.00
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$14.05
$97.26*
SUPPLIES
$135.94
$135.94
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$17.95
$17.95
STAMPS & RACK
$50.10
$50.10
RENEWAL APPLICATIONS
$48.00
$48.00
WIRELESS INTERCOM SET
$75.00
$75.00
***TOTAL**
$9,919.97
$6,669.89 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND
$3,250.08
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
RITA ADAMCZYK
JANUARY DRIVER REIMB$3.00
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$1,068.85
$3.00
$1,068.85
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
ARA/CORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
COFFEE SUPPLIES
$200.00
$200.00
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$281.64
$3.00
$281.64
$3.00
WILL ASHLEY
JANUARY DRIVER REIMB
JANUARY DRIVER REIMB
$27.00
$27.00
LEONARD W. BAZAN
BUCOM
PAGER BATTERIES
$24.50
$24.50
COMMUNITY CAB CO.
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$411.00
$249.00
$411.00
$249.00
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
SUPPLIES
REPAIRS SMITH CORONA
$95.85
$95.85
JUDY FELL
VENDOR
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
HAZEL FRICKE
CAROLYN HENDERSON
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LISA LEVIN
RAY LUNDIN
LINDA MARKAY
EARLE MATTSON
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
THE PERFECT IMAGE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OTTO SCHERR
SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CO.
JEANNE SHERMAN
SPRINGHOUSE BOOK CO.
BERTHA STEIL
KATHI WESLEY
HELEN WHITLOCK
VIRGINIA ZITO
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13192
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
SERVICE
$400.00
$400.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$18.00
$18.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
SUPPLIES
$44.75
SUPPLIES
$242.55
$287.30
SCREENING
$39.00
$39.00
MISC EXPENSES
$11.00
MISC EXPENSES
$30.14
MISC EXPENSES
$93.70
$134.84*
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
SUPPLIES
$100.46
$100.46
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
PUBLICATION
$19.70
$19.70
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$15.00
$15.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
JANUARY DRIVER
REIMB
$15.00
$15.00
***TOTAL**
$3,480.14
$3,480.14
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
B & H INDUSTRIES
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
DUES-CLEMENTS
DUES-FRITZ
ZONING MAP SUPPLIES
CONSUMER EXPO ELECTRICITY
$267.00
$148.00 $415.00
$209.91 $209.91
$25.00 $25.00
VENDOR
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NORTH WEST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PROFILE PUBLICATIONS, INC.
THE SIDWELL COMPANY
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
XEROX CORP.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$2,691.00
$2,309.00
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$8.42
$9.87
PAYMENT DATE 2113192
$29.48
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROGRAM
$625.00
$625.00
SUPPLIES
$9.56
SUPPLIES
$271.20
$280.76
LEGAL NOTICE
$161.70
$161.70
MISC EXPENSES
$10.52
$160.83
MISC EXPENSES
$21.08
$31.60-
4 COLOR REPRINTS
$1,983.00
$1,983.00
PUBLICATION
$399.00
$399.00
HEALTH CARE SERVICE
$1,333.33
$1,333.33
1048 COPIER MTCE
$225.37
FUSER LUBRICANT
$25.00
$250.37
***TOTAL**
$5,714.67
$3,594.64 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$2,120.03
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ABBORENO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC MANHOLE REPLACEMENT
INLET REPAIRS
$2,691.00
$2,309.00
$5,000.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES
$8.42
$9.87
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$29.48
SUPPLIES
$3.78
SUPPLIES
$21.37
SUPPLIES
$11.07
SUPPLIES
$15.27
SUPPLIES
$8.86
SUPPLIES
$52.71
$160.83
ADVANCE MACHINE COMPANY REPAIR VACUUMS
REPAIR VACUUMS
$236.45
$57.70
$294.15
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2%13%92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
ALLEN TESTPRODUCTS
ANIT-LOCK BRAKE SCHOOL
$700.00
$700.00
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
MATERIALS
$136.00
MATERIALS
$136.00
MATERIALS
$99.45
MATERIALS
$99.45
MATERIALS
$216.75
MATERIALS
$216.75
$904.40
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$580.00
$580.00
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
SUPPLIES
$182.51
$182.51
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO:
MICE AGREEMENT
$147.00
$147.00
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$13.90
$13.90
APWA - CITY BRANCH
REGISTER ANDLERJBOTH
$100.00
$100.00*
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
PARTS
$15.08
PARTS
$688.79
PARTS
$20.60
CREDIT PARTS
$37.14 -
PARTS
$77.20
$764.53
MELVYN BOTH
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$40.52
$40.52
BUSSE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
$5.10
SUPPLIES
$15.95
SUPPLIES
$3.79
SUPPLIES
$10.88
SUPPLIES
$24.95
SUPPLIES
$6.78
SUPPLIES
$9.58
SUPPLIES
$7.38
SUPPLIES
$21.00
$105.41
CENTURY TILE SUPPLY COMPANY
SEALER & SUPPLIES
$10.94
$10.94
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
SUPPLIES
$613.25
$613.25
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
SERVICE
SERVICE
$9,208.23
$6,191.20
$15,399.43
COMPUTERLAND
COMPUTER TRAINING
$340.00
COMPUTER TRAINING
$120.00
$460.00
CONRAD AND SON
SUPPLIES
$620.95
BATTERIES
$380.16
$1,001.11
E. D. ETNYRE AND CO.
SUPPLIES
$119.55
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
FINISHMASTER, INC.
G & K SERVICES
GERRARD PACKAGING SYSTEMS, INC
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
JOHN D. HANSEN
HELLER LUMBER CO.
HENRICKSEN
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
LITGEN SALES
MASTER HITCH, INC.
LEE AUTO PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 213%92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICE
SUPPLIES
WHEEL ALIGNMENT
SNOW REMOVAL
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
PARTS
PARTS
CREDIT
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SINCO PNEUMATIC SAW
DUST CAPS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
INVOICE AMOUNT
$80.21-
$195.54
$199.10
$22.20
$39.20
$153.12
$153.12
$105.78
$49.00
$48.00
$52.77
$214.20
$85.00
$9.40
$182.40
$604.20
$18.34
$19.30
$5.59-
$74.72
$13.54
$500.00
$2,435.80
$6.38
$182.17
$84.86
$23.03
$103.15
$293.70
$15-00
$24.00
$28.68
$4.10
$141.38
$131.80
$32.64
PAGE 19
TOTAL
$39.34
$456.04
$306.24
$105.78
$49.00
$48.00
$543.77
$604.20
$120.31
$2,935.80
$399.59
$293.70
$15.00
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
ROGER MEYER
MIDWEST PLAN SERVICE
MOTOROLA MIDWEST PAGER REPAIR
MURRAY AND TRETTEL INC.
EDWARD NASTEK
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
P & W INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
RAPP'S
RAYCO
RED WING SHOE STORE
S & S CHEMICAL CORP.
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
VAN DOORN ROOFING, INC.
VULCAN SIGN
WAL-MART STORES, INC.
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
ZARNOTH BRUSH WORKS, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
$166.48
CREDIT PARTS
$131.80-
$397.28
DERBIS REMOVAL & HAULING
$1,560.00
$1,560.00
HANDBOOK
$15.00
$15.00
2 PAGERS REPAIRED
$229.24
$229.24
SNOW ICE WARNING SERVICE
$800.00
$800.00
SNOW REMOVAL
$45.50
$45.50
SUPPLIES
$276.95
SUPPLIES
$5.91
SUPPLIES
$138.17
SUPPLIES
$1,480.00
$1,901.03
SUPPLIES
$19.97
$19.97
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$'10.34
TRNG MTG SUPPLIES
$8.99
$19.33*
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$26.11
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$5.64
$31.75
PARTS
$164.37
$164.37
SUPPLIES$58.25
$58.25
PARTS
$12.62
$12.62
SUPPLIES
$30.95
$30.95
SAFETY SHOES RORAY
$50.00
$50.00
CHEMICALS
$48.16
$48.16
SUPPLIES
$338.65
SUPPLIES
$42.48
$381.13
SUPPLIES
$237.13
$237.13
IGNITION CABLE
$12.21
$12.21
SUPPLIES
$27.56
$27.56
WELDING SUPPLIES
$705.60
$705.60
CAULKED CHIMNEY
$73.99
$73.99
SUPPLIES
$175.50
SUPPLIES
$423.00
$598.50
TELEVISION
$288.00
$288.00
FOLDING STOP SIGNS
$2,275.00
SUPPLIES
$87.85
FENCE
$960.12
$3,322.97
BROOMS
$1,464.00
$1,464.00
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$38,698.09 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
***TOTAL**
PAGE 21
TOTAL
$44,889.29
$6,191.20
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
A.C.C.I.
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
ARROW EQUIPMENT CO.
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BARI CONTRACTORS
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
CHILTON
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
COMP USA
COMPUTERLAND
CONRAD AND SON
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
E & H UTILITY SALES
REGISTER MURPHYJDELUCA
$150.00
$150.00*
SUPPLIES
$120.30
SUPPLIES
$222.92
$343.22
ADA GUIDEBOOK
$50.00
$50.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$10.40
$10.40
PARTS
$33.82
$33.82
FILM PROCESSING
$60.66
$60.66
FAN
$15.97
$15.97
SERVICE
$366.40
TIME DELAY RELAY
$116.05
$482.45
SERVICES RENDERED
$24,219.00
$24,219.00
SYMPATHY ARRGMT GESICKI
$58.00
$58.00
SUPPLIES
$613.25
$613.25
HYDRANT SEAT REMOVAL TOOL
$2,157.45
$2,157.45
FERTILIZER
$832.50
$832.50
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$94.54
$94.54
HARD DRIVE EXPANSION
$1,120.00
COMPUTER TRAINING
$80.00
$1,200.00
SUPPLIES
$60.00
SUPPLIES
$440.00
$500.00
OPERJMAIN.COSTS-JAWA
$7,871.00
VILLAAGE SAHRE FIXED COSTS-JAWA
$106,572.00
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
$110,175.00
POWER COSTS-JAWA
$10,728.00
$235,346.00
HYDRANTS
$3,301.40
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 213%92
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
SUPPLIES
'$520.76
$3,822.16
E -Z LANDSCAPING INC.
SIDEWALK BRICKS
$400.00
$400.00
THE ECONOMICS PRESS INC-
SUBSCRIPTION
$31.80
$31.80
THE FILE MART
LABEL PROTECTORS
$40.75
$40.75
FINISHMASTER, INC.
SUPPLIES
$195.54
SUPPLIES
$199.09
SUPPLIES
$22.20
SUPPLIES
$89.00
SUPPLIES
$39.20
$545.03
G & K SERVICES
UNIFORM SERVICES
$153.12
UNIFORM SERVICE
$153.12
$306.24
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MTCE COMPUTERS%PRINTER
$194.00
MICE AGREEMENT
$115.37
MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER
$52.00
$361.37
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$19.22
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$39.52
$358.74
ILLINOIS ENVIR. PROT. AGENCY
LAB ANALYSIS FEES
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
ILLINOIS SAFETY COUNCIL
MEMBERSHIP DUES
$60.00
$60.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$546.00
$546.00
LARRY'S SALES & SERVICE
TRAILER
$3,397.00
$3,397.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$71.65
PARTS
$19.30
PARTS
$98.88
PARTS
$4.06
PARTS.
$3.40
PARTS
$3.68
PARTS
$21.82
PARTS
$10.91
$233.70
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$22.65
SUPPLIES
$29.40
$52.05
LITGEN SALES
SINCO PNEUMATIC SAW
$1,270.00
$1,270.00
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$8.32
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$42.31
$50.63
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$52.15
PARTS
$65.62
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION
ROGER MEYER
MID CENTRAL WATER WORKS ASSOC.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PORTABLE TOOL SALES
POSTMASTER
PROSAFETY
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
RAPP'S
RECYCLING TODAY
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC.
TEMCO MACHINERY,'INC.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
P1,YMENT DATE 2/13/92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
PARTS
$9.31
PARTS
$25.43
UPGRADE AUTOCAD
$206.70
MATERIAL & HAULING
$2,274.36
DERBIS REMOVAL & HAULING
$970.00
MEMBER DUES-MCINTOSH
$30.00
SUPPLIES
$27.95
SUPPLIES
$19.95
SUPPLIES
$39.68
SUPPLIES
$40.16
SUPPLIES
$82.16
SUPPLIES
$16.00
SUPPLIES
$189.41
MISC EXPENSES
$.50
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$4.01
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$101.17
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$58.96
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$27.85
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$67.41
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$60.39
SUPPLIES
$277.50
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$530.17
SAFETY CAN
$60.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$11.82
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$78.78
FILM PROCESSING
$10.49
PARTS
$55.10
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$28.00
SUPPLIES
$237.13
SUPPLIES
$63.92
COUPLINGS
$41.89
WATER BILLS
$1,319.89
MUD FLAPS
$379.00
WELDING SUPPLIES
$705.61
4 LONG BARREL WRENCH
$87.80
3-4 FT TILE PROBE
$45.00
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ZONICS, INC.
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER & SEWER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/42
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
IBM QUIETWRITER RIBBONS
$289,315.25
PAGE 24
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$371.25 $371.25
***TOTAL** $289,315.25
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING
SYSTEM DIVISION
ADDISON
BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES
$11.23
$11.23
CHICAGO
& NORTHWESTERN TRANS C JANUARY LAND LEASE
$1,361.31
$1,361.31
PARKING
SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,372.54
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $1,372.54
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
REHRIG PACIFIC CO. RECYCLING BINS $3,460.00 $3,460.00
V & G PRINTERS INC. RECYCLING LETTERS/ENVELOPE $2,246.00 $2,246.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $5,706.00
GENERAL FUND
$2,246.00 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND
$3,460.00
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
AMERICAN BANKER/BOND BUYER
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO.
ROBERT DONOFRIO
I.B.M. CORPORATION
A. J. MAGGIO CO.
RUSSELL MUELLER
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
TECH SYN CORPORATION
TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, L
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
VULCAN SIGN
ZIEBART
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
POLICE 6 FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13%92
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
BOND ADVERTISING
BOND ADVERTISING
BOND ADVERTISING
PROPERTY PURCHASE
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
MODEMS
CONSTRUCTION SVCS
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
CREDIT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PARTS
ENGIINEERING SERVICES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
ENGINEERING SERVICES
NOV/DEC91 LOCKUP/FOOD
SUPPLIES
RUSTPROOF 91 DUMPTRUCK
INVOICE AMOUNT
$463.38
$62.48
$775.78
$1,269,641.92
$1,000.00
$2,314.00
$132,939.00
$890.00
$5.88-
$14.41
$36.72
$170.80
$31,882.52
$26.79
$75.50
$2,529.11
$100.00
$305.00
$275.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 25
TOTAL
$1,301.64
$1,269,641.92*
$1,000.00
$2,314.00
$132,939.00
$890.00
$45.25
$170.80
$31,882.52
$102.29
$2,529.11
$100.00
$305.00
$275.00
$1,443,496.53
$593.34 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $1,270,410.30
$135,353.00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1992 $62.48
$36,301.63 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992 $775.78
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & EXPENSES $42.00 $42.00*
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS SUPPLIES $90.00 $90.00
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $132.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/13/92
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND ,$132.00
********************************************************************************************************
DEBT SERVICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLOOD LOAN INT 2/1/92 $270.44
21.1192
3 373 29 $3 643 73
FLOOD LOAN PRIN
DEBT SERVICE
GENERAL FUND $3,643.73
***TOTAL** $3,643.73
********************************************************************************************************
PENSIONS
NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A.
WITHHOLDING TAXES
$200.00
$883.22
$200.00
$883.22
CHARLES W. NICK
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FEBRUARY 92 PENSION
MARCH MEDICAL INSURANCE
$484.50
$484.50
PAUL H. WATKINS
FEB92 DISABILITY BENEFIT
$1,482.33
$1,482.33
PENSIONS
***TOTAL**
$3,050.05
GENERAL FUND
$883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
$2,663,543.47
DATE RUN 2%13%92 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 27
TIME RUN 12.42.07 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVL LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 2�13J92
NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT
1 GENERAL FUND $576,931.20
21 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $5,384.85
22 MOTOR FUEL.TAX FUND $6,191.20
23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $3,511.77
24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $68,738.12
31 BENEFIT TRUST #2 " $2,166.83
41 WATER & SEWER FUND $403,421.54
46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $4,270.92
48 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $593.34
49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $70,898.42
51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $1,273,660.38
53 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $135,353.00
57 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1992 $62.48
58 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $36,301.63
59 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1992 $775.78
64 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & 11991A $4,194.97
73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $13,061.79
74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $58,025.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $2,663,543.47
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
January 1, 1992 - January 31, 1992
Fund
Revenues
Expenses
Fund
Balance
for
for
Balance
Dee 31 1991
January 1992
January 1992
Jan 31 1992
General and Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,779,549
$< 370;007>
$< 164,100>
$ 1,573,642
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
450,214
90,273
42,011
498,476
Community Development'Block Grant
117,713
-
9,837
107,876
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
< 62,845>
-
48,660
< 111,505>
Refuse Disposal Fund
-
1,342,111
1,665,409
< 323,298>
EnterRri�nds
Water & Sewer Fund
3,857,811
327,558
381,627
3,803,742
Parking System Revenue Fund
171,871
16,863
7,886
180,848
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,146,577
356,537
281,046
1,222,068
Vehicle Replacement Fund
430,984
2,518
1,998
431,504
Cai)ital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
662,165
311,709
3,212
32,838
1,571
941,036
330,216
Downtwon Redev. Const. Funds
Police & Fire Building Construction
328,575
6,079,179
35,212
382,390
5,732,001
Flood Control Const. Fund
2,438,396
10,803
460,091
1,989,108
Debt Service Funds
648,397
79,952
827
727,522
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
16,835,681
160,871
70,453
16,926,099
Firemen's Pension Fund
18,829,229
179,001
115,376
18,892,854
Benefit Trust Funds
251.403
1.502
2.167
250.738
$53.964.899
52.5,548.115
$3.340.087
$53,172,927
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D
G E T R E V E N
U E S U M M A R Y
1,754,550.00 931,257.17
823,292.83
46.92
5/01/91 -
1/31/92
82,093.89
62.90
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
GENERAL FUND
AROUN
agalvep
BAJAKSBALANCE
TAX REVENUE
10,559,300.00
5,875,257.73
4,684,042.27
44.35
FEE REVENUE
1,731,100.00
1,634,013.95
97,086.05
5.60
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
2,056,000.00
1,617,276.30
438,723.70
21.33
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
356,100.00
269,670.29
86,429.71
24.27
FINES AND FORFEITS
370,600.00
217,662.68
152,937.32
41.26
OTHER REVENUE
791,650,00_
673.357.12
118.292,88
14.94
FUND TOTALS
M .750..09
IOJ8�7,238.07x,577.511,93
35.15 X
REFUSE, Pti A FUND
TAX REVENUE
1,754,550.00 931,257.17
823,292.83
46.92
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
130,500.00 48,406.11
82,093.89
62.90
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
636,000.00 362,417.12
273,582.88
43.01
OTHER REVENUE
.DO 3D.37
30.7-,
.00
FUND TOTALS 2,.521„,,050.04 1,342,110.77 ,1.178.939.23 46.76 %
TRFU TX FUN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,150,000.00 825,935.95 324,064.05 28.17
OTHER REVENUE 55,300,00 36,14.,8„,76, 19,1511.24 34.63
FUND TOTALS 1,20,3W.00 862,084„.71 28.47 X
r&MNTTYOCK
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 305,130.00 313,996.00 8,866.00- 2.90 -
OTHER REVENUE 2.0,000.00_ _, B.,jM 15„, 11 1_.R� 59.30
FUND TOTALS 325.130.00 3 2,134.15 2.9955.455 92 X
ILLM
PA R M T FUND
TAX REVENUE 695,775.00 361,547.93 334,227.07 48.03
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 5 P E C T
8 U D G C T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
ILL, MU
Rf-TIREMENJ FUND AMOUNT MOVED RALAKE BALANCE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 50,000.00 28,519.62 21,480.38 42.96
OTHER REVENUE 2.500.00 1,768.80 731.20 29.24
FUND TOTALS 740,271,00 391,836.35 Z§Aj3LO- 47.63 %
BENEFIT TRUST #2 --
OTHER REVENUE 0,000.0013J17.4j_ 6,042.55 30.41
FUND TOTALS 20.000.00 13,917,45 6,082.55 30.41 %
LIBRARY FUNR
TAX REVENUE 2,123,655.OD M. 2,123,655.00 100.00
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 78,500.00 '00 78,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 621.500= .00 --§9ijgg-Qg- 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2.823,655.00 Do -9199LA5-5 AL 100.00 %
WATER R FVN2
TAX REVENUE
1,373,050.00
867,163.96
505,886.04
36.84
FEE REVENUE
15,OOD.OD
10,076.32
4,923.68
32.82
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
4,440,000.00
3,504,568.83
935,431A7
21.06
OTHER REVENUE
k{.150.00
,-Q
ZMJZtgj_
IM_77&0
31.80
FUND TOTALS 6.239.200.00 4.662,109.0 1J77.010.94 25.27 %
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
FEE REVENUE 2,880.00 2,400.00 480.00 16.66
PARKING REVENUE 171,500.00 132,438.15 39,061.85 22.77
OTHER REVENUE 10,000.00 28.70
FUND TOTALS 1,84.380.00 141,967.91 ---42.-412-92- 23.00 %
V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D 6 E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
RI MANAC ,,gMEN T FUND
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND ....... . .
. ..........A T
... Realygo
LALAKE
BALANC
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
581,900.00
581,900.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
65000,00
51,638,73,
11^361.27
18.03
FUND TOTALS
644,9W,00.
633.538.7„'3„
11,361, 7
1.76 %
RI MANAC ,,gMEN T FUND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
1,892,550.00
403,750.00
404,800.00 21.39
OTHER REVENUE
362,600,00
__jq 815_25
34,784.75 9.09
FUND TOTALS
?,275,150.00
1,835,565.25,
439,584.75 19.32 %
CAPITAL IMPROYEM T FUN -
, -END
TAX REVENUE
403,750.00
219,117.81
184,632.19
45.72
FEE REVENUE
40,000.00
.00
40,000.00
100.00
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
865,000.00
584,617.05
280,382.95
32.41
IMTERFUND TRANSFERS
250,000.00
250,000.00
.00
.00
OTHER REVENUE
1,515,0,90.00
162,258,.,8
1,352,741,
$9.28
FUND TOTALS.
3,073,750.00
-!-2 �993-6L
1.857,756.32
60.43 %
POLICE & FIRE elX N$T-FW
OTHER REVENUE 127,224, 7,775.01 5.75
FUND TOTALS 135,000.00 187,,224.9997. 77j.01 5.75 %
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
OTHER REVENUE 4j00,000-00 4J57,278. 52_?785L 1.39-
FUND TOTALS4,100,M9.00 4,157,278, 1.39-%
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U MM A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMTCONST 199
OTHER REVENUE 1.025.000.00 534.761.57_ 4Qj�238,43 47.82
FUND TOTALS 110,21,QN.00,_ 5�jj§ljZ_ J29,23,§.43 47.82 %
DOWNTOWNREDEYLPHT CONST 1992
FUND TOTALS .00 .00 .00 .00 %
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
TAX REVENUE 450,000.00 .00 450,000.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 2.950.000.00 2.989.864.22 39,8¢4,22- 1.35 -
FUND TOTALS _3,4 0,000.00 2,989,864,22 _ '410,135,78 12.06 %
FLOOD COMTRQ
QQN
ST FUND 1"
OTHER REVENUE 2,775.000.00 DO 2.775,000.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2.]75.000.00 .00 2.775,000.00 100.00 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES B t I 19,73
TAX REVENUE 154,200.00 $7,786.74 66,413.26 43.06
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,400.00 4,750.00 650.00 12.03
OTHER REVENUE 10.000.00 7.285.24 -_2,71„C Z§ 27.14
FUND TOTALS 769.600,00 99 821.98 69.778,02 41.14 %
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
BALANCE
BALANCE
FEE REVENUE
13,500.00
14,375.00
875.00-
6.48 -
OTHER REVENUE
00
55813.58
5.813.58-
.00
FUND TOTALS
13,50.00
20- 20.188.58
¢,688.58-
49.54-%
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMTCONST 199
OTHER REVENUE 1.025.000.00 534.761.57_ 4Qj�238,43 47.82
FUND TOTALS 110,21,QN.00,_ 5�jj§ljZ_ J29,23,§.43 47.82 %
DOWNTOWNREDEYLPHT CONST 1992
FUND TOTALS .00 .00 .00 .00 %
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
TAX REVENUE 450,000.00 .00 450,000.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE 2.950.000.00 2.989.864.22 39,8¢4,22- 1.35 -
FUND TOTALS _3,4 0,000.00 2,989,864,22 _ '410,135,78 12.06 %
FLOOD COMTRQ
QQN
ST FUND 1"
OTHER REVENUE 2,775.000.00 DO 2.775,000.00 100.00
FUND TOTALS 2.]75.000.00 .00 2.775,000.00 100.00 %
CORPORATE PURPOSES B t I 19,73
TAX REVENUE 154,200.00 $7,786.74 66,413.26 43.06
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,400.00 4,750.00 650.00 12.03
OTHER REVENUE 10.000.00 7.285.24 -_2,71„C Z§ 27.14
FUND TOTALS 769.600,00 99 821.98 69.778,02 41.14 %
V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
SSA #1 PROPECT MEADOWS
TAX REVENUE 19,700.00 9,329.54 10,370.46 52.64
OTHER REVENUE 2,500,m- 1,933.74 566.2 22.65
FUND TOTALS 22.2 .00 11,263,.,2L 10.936.72 49.26 %
SSA #2 SLACKHAWK 8
TAX REVENUE 19,950.00 8,497.29 11,452.71 57.40
OTHER REVENUE 3100.00 1,974 1,025,30. 34.17
FUND TOTALS 22,950.,00 10,471.99 12,478.01 54.37 %
POLICE & FIRE IM 8 4 1 1991A
TAX REVENUE 200,000-00 156,402.95 43,597.05 21.79
OTHER REVENUEI . 5go- - 00 20318.79 --.19-018.79-- 267 -91 -
FUND TOTALS 2 -_ 12.19 %
Q1,500,00 176,921.74 24�570. 26
DOWNTOWN RED &
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 49,000.00 15,999.24 33,000.76 67.34
OTHER REVENUE D0---9-524 0-7 ----MA-QL- .00
FUND TOTALS 49AM00 _ 18 523.31 30,476 62.19 %
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
CORPORAT g -PURPOSES a & 1 1974
AMOUNT
RECEIVED
BA NCE
LA LANC
TAX REVENUE
232,950.00
139,269.68
93,68032
40.21
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
8,000.00
6,700.00
1,300.00
16.25
OTHER REVENUE
17 .00_
11,082
5,917,97
34.81
FUND TOTALS
-257-9-59A0
157,051,71
109,898-29
39.11 %
SSA #1 PROPECT MEADOWS
TAX REVENUE 19,700.00 9,329.54 10,370.46 52.64
OTHER REVENUE 2,500,m- 1,933.74 566.2 22.65
FUND TOTALS 22.2 .00 11,263,.,2L 10.936.72 49.26 %
SSA #2 SLACKHAWK 8
TAX REVENUE 19,950.00 8,497.29 11,452.71 57.40
OTHER REVENUE 3100.00 1,974 1,025,30. 34.17
FUND TOTALS 22,950.,00 10,471.99 12,478.01 54.37 %
POLICE & FIRE IM 8 4 1 1991A
TAX REVENUE 200,000-00 156,402.95 43,597.05 21.79
OTHER REVENUEI . 5go- - 00 20318.79 --.19-018.79-- 267 -91 -
FUND TOTALS 2 -_ 12.19 %
Q1,500,00 176,921.74 24�570. 26
DOWNTOWN RED &
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 49,000.00 15,999.24 33,000.76 67.34
OTHER REVENUE D0---9-524 0-7 ----MA-QL- .00
FUND TOTALS 49AM00 _ 18 523.31 30,476 62.19 %
V I L L A G E 0 F N 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T R E V E N U 6 S U M N A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
INSURANCE RESERVE 0 & 1 1987 AMOUNT BALANCE
OTHER REVENUE 1,000.00 1,157.59 157.59- 15.75 -
FUND TOTALS 1.000.00 1,157.59 157.59- 15.75-%
FLOOD CONTROL 9 & 11991A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 90,500.00 87,867.31 2,632.69 2.90
OTHER REVENUE Do 13,909.4$ 13,989.48- .00
FUND TOTALS 90,500.00 iDI,856.7911,356.79- 12.54-%
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & 119870
TAX REVENUE 115,000.00 149,914.75 34,914.75- 30.36 -
OTHER REVENUE 5,000.00 6,302.42 1,302,42- 26.04
FUND TOTALS 120,000.00 156,217.17 36,217.17- 30.18-%
PW FACILITY 0 19879
TAX REVENUE 371,550.00 206,783.81 164,766.19 44.34
OTHER REVENUE 019MA 17.405,27 7j?—c73 30.37
FUND TOTALS 396,550,00 224,189.08 172,360,92 43.46 %
OOMMIM REDEVLPMT 0 $ 11987C
TAX REVENUE 119,500.00 119,145.00 355.00 .29
OTHER REVENUE 145.99 2.45 142,55 98.31
FUND TOTALS 1-19,6A5.gg 119,147.45 497,55 .41 %
POLICE PEN ION FUND
TAX REVENUE 76,500.00 27,389.26 49,110.74 64.19
V I L L A G E O F N 0 U
N T P R O S P E
C T
B U D G E T R E V E N
U E S U M M A R
Y
5/01/91 -
1/31/92
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
POLKE p AMOUNT
RECEIVED
A CE
SALANCg
OTHER REVENUE 1,948,500.00
x.798 5�
353,701,4
18.15
FUND TOTALS 2.025,000-00_
_1, 187 L7L
402.812.22
19.89 X
PEN
I FUND
TAX REVENUE 25,500.00 .00 25,500.00 100.00
OTHER REVENUE _2,181.900.00_ 1.741,119.34_ 4780,66 20.20
FUND TOTALS 2,207,400;00 _1.741,119.34 466,280.66 21.12 X
GAPIT& IMPMMW
FUND TOTALS OQ .00 •00 X
FLOOD CONTROL 0 4, I 1MA
FUND TOTALS .00 DO DO .00 X
WVNTOWN R
FUND TOTALS ,� 00 .00_ .00 %
TAX REVENUE. 32,200.00 16,393.28 15,806.72 49.06
OTHER REVENUE lAo6,00 616,69 083=31 45.55
FUND TOTALS 33,70a.00 17,„x.97 16.490.03 48.93 X
TOTALS ALL FUNDS 53,091,035.00 33,995,033.07 19,096,001.93 35.96 %
LESS TRANSFERS 389,500.00„ 9.14 X
TOTAL REVENUES 52.701,535.00 3616 X
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
011 VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
EXPENDITURE CLA§SjFjCATIOM.-_
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFILATION
AMOUNT
EXPF"pgp
SALAKJ .
. .......BALANCE
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
71,150.00
56,911.19
14,238.81
20.01
ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION
3,000.00
490.51
2,509.49
83.64
PROGRAM TOTALS
74,150.00
57,401.70
16,748.30
22.58 1
EXPENDITURE CLA§SjFjCATIOM.-_
PERSONAL SERVICES
21,450.00
15,999.31
5,450.69 25.41
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
46,450.00
35,884.69
10,565.31 22.74
COMMODITIES
6250,00
5,517.70
73230 11.71
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 74,150.00. 57,401.70_ 22.58 %
§ORCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 71,700.00 55,652.54 16,047.46 22.38
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 2,450.00 1,749,16 700.94.. 28.60
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 74,150.00 57.401J0 22.58 %
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
B U D G E T E X P E N 0 I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
021 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ITUR C S5 ICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
VILLAGE ADMINISTRATION
222,525.00
166,427.08
56,097.92
25.20
LEGAL SERVICES
157,500.00
100,683.21
56,816.79
36.07
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT A TRAININ
$4 ,m-OQl
60,008.09.
24.081 .91
28.63
PROGRAM TOTALS
464JI5.00
327.118.38,
136996,62
29.51 X
ITUR C S5 ICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
244,195.00
182,242.14
61,952.86
25.37
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
216,020.00
142,417.83
73,602.17
34.07
COMMODITIES
3,400.00
1,458.41
1,941.59
57.10
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
.....500.,00_.
1.000.00....
5OQ.QO-
100.00 -
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 115-08 327.118.38 _ 1�6 62_ 29.51 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 427,475.00 299,584.74 127,890.26 29.91
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 36,640.00_ 27,533.64 - 9,106,36 24.85
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 4¢x.115.00 327JI8.34 136.996.62 1 29.51 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N'T P R 0 S P E C T
B U 0 G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
022 COMMUNICATION DIVISION
EXPENDITURE qLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
173,445.00
110,417.81
63,027.19
36.33
VILLAGE TELEPHONE SYSTEM
4,1,75O&Q.
22.A$.
13,327,52
31.92
PROGRAM TOTALS
215,195.00
138,840.29.,
76,354,71
35.48 %
EXPENDITURE qLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
113,875.00
75,378.80
38,496.20
33.80
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
70,620.00
49,701.57
20,918.43
29.62
COMMODITIES
13,000.00
5,467.03
7,532.97
57.94
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
17,70Q.00
8,292.89
9M7,11
53.14
EXPENDITURE TOTALS
215,195.-.00
IMJ40.29
7§j54.71
35.48 %
GENERAL FUND Z15,195,00 138,040,29,, 76,354.71 35.48
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 215,195.00 138,040.29 __7JJ54.71 35.48 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
B U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
031 FINANCE DEPARTMENT
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
FINANCE ADMINISTRATION
244,580.00
175,231.74
69,348.26
28.35
ACCOUNTING
91,935.00
69,228.51
22,706.49
24.69
PURCHASING
26,100.00
19,253.69
6,846.31
26.23
DATA PROCESSING
109,205.00
75,710.61
33,494.39
30.67
DUPLICATING SERVICES
35,000.00
29,270.44
5,729.56
16.37
INSURANCE PROGRAM
240,865.00
190,775.23
50,089.77
20.79
CUSTOMER SERVICES
161,010.00
115,345.44
45,664.56
28.36
CASH MANAGEMENT
24,805.00
18317.59
6,487,41
26.15
PROGRAM TOTALS
933,5=00
693,133.25
240,30 .75
25.74 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
517,320.00 381,804.65 135,515.35
26.19
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
380,180.00 286,286.24 93,893.76
24.69
COMMODITIES
30,000.00 19,699.36 10,300.64
34.33
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
61000-00 5,343.00 657-00
10.95
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 933,500. Do 693,133,25 2§0,36635 25.74 %
SOURCE OF FUM,,
GENERAL FUND 853,340.00 633,548.47 219,791.53 25.75
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 80,160.00 59.584.78 --aLula- 25.66
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 933.500.00 69,3,133,25 693,133,25 240,366.75 25.74 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
032 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
EXPENDITURE CIASSIVICATION,
PERSONAL SERVICES 75,385.00 56,679.24 18,705.76 24.81
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,550.00 51,714.48 18,835.52 26.69
COMMODITIES 8,mg,00 1,180.94 14.76
EXPENDITURE TOTALS�35 - 25.15 %
$QQR(lf OF FUNDS ...............
GENERAL FUND 141,965.00 106,204.89 35,760.11 25.18
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND11,970. 9.007.8-9— 2.962.1.1 24.74
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 153,935-oo.- _115x21 2 - 78 __38722.22_ 25.15 %
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM.gLASSIFICATIgy
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
.... ..... . SALA NCE -.,.
BALANCE
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
115,435.00
$5,934.06
29,500.94
25.55
VILLAGE NEWSLETTER
�38500.00
29,278.72
22128
23.95
PROGRAM TOTALS
153,935,00
115.M1 ,78
3$ 722.2
25.15 %
EXPENDITURE CIASSIVICATION,
PERSONAL SERVICES 75,385.00 56,679.24 18,705.76 24.81
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,550.00 51,714.48 18,835.52 26.69
COMMODITIES 8,mg,00 1,180.94 14.76
EXPENDITURE TOTALS�35 - 25.15 %
$QQR(lf OF FUNDS ...............
GENERAL FUND 141,965.00 106,204.89 35,760.11 25.18
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND11,970. 9.007.8-9— 2.962.1.1 24.74
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 153,935-oo.- _115x21 2 - 78 __38722.22_ 25.15 %
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
8U06ET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
035 RISK MANAGEMENT
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2.300.000.00
1.699,404.23
600,595.77
26.11
PROGRAM TOTALS 2.300.000.00
14699 404.23
600,595.77,
26.11 %
EXPEND
CLASSIFICATION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2.300.000.00 14-¢9,x,404.23.... �„�,� 26.11
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2,300.000.00 14699.404.23 ¢,QQS95.77_ 26.11 %
$Qyfl&E Of F
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 2,300.000.00 1.699.404.23 604037 26.11
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2,300.000.00 1,,10.404,23 _m,5m n 26.11 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
037 INSPECTION SERVICES
EXPMITIJRE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM Cj�ASSIFICATION .........
... 'AnWNT
-EXPENDED
BALANCE
gAhAKE
BUILDING CODE SERVICES
425,955.00
374,940.77
51,014.23
11.97
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SERVICES
146,120.00
.00
146,120.00
100.00
ENGINEERING SERVICES
45§.525-00.
320�988.78
IZZJ36,22
27.93
PROGRAM TOTALS
7OL929,55
324,670.41
31.56 %
EXPMITIJRE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
$11,150.00,
565,965.11
245,184.89
30.22
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
184,450.00
126,652.80
57,797.20
31.33
COMMODITIES
15,500.00
8,204.19
7,295.81
47.06
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
17,500.00
3,107.45
14,392.55
82.24
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 1,028,600.00 703°929J5 324,670,45 31.56 Z
SOURCE Of FUND$
GENERAL FUND 889,210.00 599,374.58 289,835.42 32.59
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 16,000.00 11,936.50 4,063.50 25.39
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND _-j9Lj29--OO 92,6W47 _-j9-L7-1,5-3 24.93
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 1,298,699--00- -ZqL2n--55 -191&-9-45 31.56 %
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
041 POLICE DEPARTMENT
gXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
POLICE ADMINISTRATION
1,202,510.00
884,070.23
318,439.77
26.48
PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
3,121,075.00
2,358,169.83
762,905.17
24.44
CRIME PREVENTION 8 PUBLIC SERV
142,765.00
100,015.61
42,749.39
29.94
INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PRO
626,260.00
468,068.72
158,191.28
25.25
CROSSING GUARDS
48,250.00
27,255.77
20,994.23
43.51
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE i OPERAT
429.350.00
357.567.18
/7.782:82
16.71
PROGRAM TOTALS
5,5,70,21,0,00
4,195,147.34
1,.375,062.66
24.68 %
gXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
4,445,310.00
3,279,409.95
1,165,900.05
26.22
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
896,500.00
754,879.04
141,620.96
15.79
COMMODITIES
171,200.00
117,483.45
53,716.55
31.37
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
57,200.00„
43.374.90
��2.5,10
24.16
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 5,570,21_0.00 4.195.147.34 1.375.062.66 24.68 %
SOURCE F FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 4,997,840.00 3,716,275.30 1,281,564.70 25.64
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 112,470.00 80,321.46 32,148.54 28.58
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 171,400.00 167,750.58 3,649.42 2.12
POLICE PENSION FUND ,QQ 230.8,QQ,00 57,700.00 20.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 5.570,210.00 4,195.147.34 1.375.062.66 24.68 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U 0 G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
042 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
SIFICATI ON
AE
EXPEN2go
SALA-C9 ,
JALANCE
FIRE ADMINISTRATION
937,050.00
690,858.52
246,191.48
26.27
FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS
3,349,735.00
2,498,242.56
851,492.44
25.41
FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY
29,490.00
21,201.41
8,288.59
28.10
FIRE PREVENTION
283,975.00
198,650.61
85,324.39
30.04
FIRE COMMUNICATIONS
52,460.00
32,923.09
19,536.91
37.24
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERAT
275,705.00
236,565.06
39,139.94
14.19
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
18,350.00
14,392.0,
3,957.59
21.56
PROGRAM TOTALS
j,2gL65, QL
3,692,833.66
1,253,931.34
25.34 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
4,009,015.00
2,945,259.81
1,063,755.19
26.53
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
728,490.00
592,872.32
135,617.68
18.61
COMMODITIES
108,235.00
82,527.68
25,707.32
23.75
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
101,0MOD
72,173.85
28,851-15
28.55
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 4,946,765.00 3,622,833,66 1,253,931.34 25.34 %
SE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
4,362,970.00
3,211,341.15
1,151,628.85
26.39
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
44,310.00
32,837.77
11,472.23
25.89
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
179,585.00
160,734.74
18,850.26
10.49
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
359,900.00,
287,920,00
71,98,0.00...
20.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 4,946,765.00 3,692,833,66 1,7M931.34 25.34 %
V I L L A G E O F N 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
043 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASS JFICATIgN 6MT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
POLICE i FIRE DISPATCH SERVICE 328,925.00
275,195.24
53,729.76
16.33
PROGRAM TOTALS 328.925.00
2 ,195.24
53,729.76
16.33 X
CLASSIFICATION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 328,925.00 274,100.00 54,825.00 16.66
COMMODITIES .00 1,095.24 1.095.24- .00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS .?�,,." 2,75...195.24 553,,7j,Q,;7¢_ 16.33 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 32S.925,QQ 275.195.24 53.729.76 16.33
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 3?,A.2?5,00 27.E 195,24 5,3„729..76 16.33 %
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
052 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGLAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BA NC
INFORMATION, REFERRAL, & COUNS
191,160.00
153,625,39
37,534.61
19.63
RECREATION AND EDUCATION
18,440.00
14,522.17
3,917.83
21.24
HOMEBOUND SERVICES
84,510.00
52,102.01
32,407.99
38.34
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
49,615.00
28,237.26
21,377.74
43.08
BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM
4,255.00
2,613.90
1,641.10
38.56
SOCIAL AGENCIES -
16,500.00
17,050.0055Q.Qq-
3.33 -
PROGRAM TOTALS
364,480,Q0
268,150,73
96.329.27
26.42 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
276,320.00
196,733.78
79,586.22
28.80
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
77,810.00
63,121.48
14,688.52
18.87
COMMODITIES
5,500.00
3,560.88
1,939.12
35.25
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
4,850,00
4,734,59
1,15.41
2.37
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 364,480.00 �ZMJW73 96JR9J7 26.42 %
SCE Of FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 321,935.00 236,709.39 85,225.61 26.47
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 42,545.00 31,441.34 11J03.66 26.09
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 364A80,00 268,150,73 96,3n27 26.42 %
V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
062 PLANNING DEPARTMENT
MENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOU14T
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
PLANNING, ZONING, & ADMINISTRA
214,795.00
146,030.62
68,764.38
32.01
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
90,300.00
56,133.83
34,166.17
37.83
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT PLANNIN
13,440.00
13,706.64
266.64-
1.98-
CDOG ADMINISTRATION
51,130.00
31,831.09
19,298.91
37.74
COBS COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
39,000.00
39,002.12
2.12-
.00
CON ACCESSIBILITY & NEIGHBORM
60,000.00
.00
60,000.00
100.00
CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATIO
125,I00.00
102,336.54
22,763.46
18.19
CDOG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION
39,900.00
131.86
39,768.14
99.66
CD86 MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITATI
10,000.00
1 1_44.95
8,855.05
$8.55
PROGRAM TOTALS
643, 665, W
--nqmLm-
253,347.35-
39.36 %
MENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
298,565-00
204,787.84
93,777.16
29.03
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
122,750.00
78,335.54
44,414,46
36.18
COMMODITIES
-4,350.00
1,154.42
3,195.58
73.46
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
228. ,00
10,6,039,85
12'1'960.15
53.49
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 643,665.00 -12LIU-0- —9LIE-33- 39.36 %
SOURC
FUNDS
GENERAL FUND 281,850.00 188,869.90 92,980.10 32.98
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT MM GRANT 325,130.00 174,446.56 150,683.44 46.34
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 27,001J9 --- 2-01LI1 26.39
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS -&aAkLM- -120J17A5 253.3'47.35 39.36 39.36 X
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
071 STREET DIVISION
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET,
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE,
BALANCE
STREET DIVISION ADMIN & SUPPOR
683,445.00
508,125.75
175,319.25
25.65
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDING
379,565.00
266,161.72
113,403.28
29.87
MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
167,300.00
141,138.11
26,161.89
15.63
STREET MAINTENANCE
1,746,295.00
1,284,739.37
461,555.63
26.43
SNOW REMOVAL
215,570.00
140,243.86
75,326.14
34.94
LEAF REMOVAL
83,985.00
82,523.34
1,461.66
1.74
STORK SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENA
130,305.00
102,336.83
27,968.17
21.46
FORESTRY
402,465.00
273,122,54
129,342.46
32.13
TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE
81,015.00
44,660.06
36,354.94
44.87
PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION
36,300.00
22,494.55
13,$05.45
38.03
MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS
50,605.00
18,627.04
31,977.96
63.19
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
430,185.00
354,574.01
75,610.99
17.57
POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
22,725.00
19,167.51
3,557.49
15.65
TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIGHT
3071125-00
195.579,17
111,545,03
36.31
PROGRAM TOTALS
4.736,885.00
3,453,493.86
128j9i.14
27.09 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
GENERAL FUND
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,496,435.00
1,074,322.97
422,112.03
28.20
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,106,4=00
836,459.09
269,940.91
24.39
COMMODITIES
467,350.00
313,710.71
153,639.29
32.87
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1,666.?
1,229,001.09
437�698,91
26.26
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 4336,885,00 3,453,493.86 1,28339IJ4 27.09 %
SOURICI 2F FUNOJ
GENERAL FUND
2,872,425.00
2,020,794.22 851,630.78
29.64
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
1,399,ODO.00
1,028,535.96 370,464.04
26.48
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
230,460.00
172,126.31 58,333.69
25.31
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
235.000.00
232.037.37 2,962,63
1.26
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 4.736 885.00 J.�918L 1,01,0 - 14 27.09 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
072 WATER AMD SEWER DIVISION
EXPENDITURE CLASJIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
T
EXPENDEDNCE
348,698.42
28.65
WATER & SEWER DIV ADMIN & SUPP
1,620,445.00
1,375,563.32
244,881.68
15.11
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDING
61,425.00
40,134.76
21,290.24
34.66
MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
49,985.00
35,538.41
14,446.59
28.90
WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE & REP
264,255.OD
154,113.48
110,141.52
41.68
WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. & RE
337,520.00
171,621.43
165,898.57
49.15
WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT.
137,125.00
90,374.65
46,750.35
34.09
WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.& REPL
206,135.OD
120,528.07
$5,606.93
41.52
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERAT
357,720.00
280,748.11
76,971.89
21.51
SANITARY SEWER MAINT. & REPAIR
115,070.00
103,439.92
11,630.08
10.10
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
215,000.00
205,665.06
9,334.94
4.34
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
100,000.00
93,147.00
6,853.00
6.85
LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITIO
3.087.750.00
2,113.442.00
974 308.00
31.55
PROGRAM TOTALS
6,552.430.00
4.784,316.21
1,76$.113.79
26.98 %
EXPENDITURE CLASJIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
1,216,980.00
868,281.58
348,698.42
28.65
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,948,700.00
2,773,646.63
1,175,053.37
29.75
COMMODITIES
351,100.00
207,830.31
143,269.69
40.80
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
444,900.00
344,264.14
10D,635.86
22.61
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
590•750.00
590.293.55
456.45
.07
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 6.552.430.00 4.784.316.21 1_,7,68,113.79 26.98 %
OF FUNDS
WATER & SEWER FUND 6,552,430.00 4.784,316.21 1,768.113.79 26.98
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 6.552,430.00 4.784.316.21 1,7 ,113.79 26.98 %
V I L L A G E 0 F N 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U 0 G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M N A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
073 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
EYPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION .
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AM99NT-
EXPENDED
6,725.92
gALANCE
PARKING DIVISION ADMIN 9 SUPPO
60,375.00
47,156A8
13,218.82
21.89
PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE
157.610.00
110,522,50
47,087.70
29.87
PROGRAM TOTALS
217,985.00
157678.48
�60306.52
27.66 %
EYPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION .
.......
PERSONAL SERVICES
22,885.00
16,159.08
6,725.92
29.39
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
54,650.00
40,585.50
14,064.50
25.73
COMMODITIES
5,800.00
2,083.90
3,716.10
64.07
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
134,650,QQ
wsso.00-
26.58
EXPENDITURE TOTALS �217985.00 157 �678,48 60,306.52 27.66 %
SOURCE OF FUND-$
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 217,985,00 157,67849 60,306.52 27.66
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS _-217,285.00 157,678.48 -ffl--3w.-52 27.66 %
V I L L A G E 0 F N 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
0 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U N N A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
075 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPEMQeD B&ANCE BALANCE
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 2,403,035.00 1,680,239.03 722,795.97 30.07
PROGRAM TOTALS 2,403,035.00 1,680,239.03 „722.795.97 30.07 %
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
PERSONAL SERVICES
56,885.00
43,921.85 12,963.15
22.78
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,254,200.00
1,539,828.42 714,371.59
31.69
COMMODITIES
91,950.00
92,513.76 563.76-
.61 -
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
.001,975,00
3,975,00-
.00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2,403,035.00 1,680,239.03 -7I2.M-27 30.07 %
S.DURCE QE FUNDS
REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 2,403,035.00 1,640,239,00 722.795,97 30.07
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2,403,035.00 -z?9j25.2L 30.07 %
V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T
BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
077 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
EXPENO
RE C F TION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 204,800.00 38,003.36 166,796.64 81.44
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9,947,650.00 7,920,185.59 2,027,464.41 20.38
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 3891500,00 353,80.55 3,2.633,45 9.14
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 10.541,950.00 8 3l ,,05,5.50 2,229.894.50 21.15 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BALANCE
BALANCE
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRU
887,000.00
86,648.13
800,351.87
90.23
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS
2,961,650.00
1,924,418.62
1,037,231.38
35.02
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
34,800.00
65,381.90
30,581.90-
87.87-
POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONSTRUCT
4,650,000.00
5,663,878.33
1,013,878.33-
21.80 -
GENERAL EQUIP 8 IMPRVMNTS
1,450,000.00
24,589.33
1,425,410.67
98.30
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL558.5.
,00
„w,�±4 ,,,�,,1,'�9,19
„- 11,,360..81
2.03
PROGRAM TOTALS
10,541.950,00
8,312,055-50
2.229,894,50
21.15 X
EXPENO
RE C F TION
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 204,800.00 38,003.36 166,796.64 81.44
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9,947,650.00 7,920,185.59 2,027,464.41 20.38
INTERFUND TRANSFERS 3891500,00 353,80.55 3,2.633,45 9.14
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 10.541,950.00 8 3l ,,05,5.50 2,229.894.50 21.15 X
SOURCE OF FUNDS
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
558,500.00
547,139.19
11,360.81
2.03
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
1,484,800.00
89,971.23
1,394,828.77
93.94
POLICE 9 FIRE BLDG CDNST FUND
250,000.00
250,000.00
.00
.00
POLICE i FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
4,400,000.00
5,413,878.33
1,013,878.33-
23.04 -
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
.00
904.27
904.27-
.00
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
887,000.00
85,743.86
801,256.14
90.33
FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991
2.961.650.00
1.924�4%62
1.037,2}1.38
35.02
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS'10.541.950.00 8,31,2,Q55.50 2 Zn,. 894, 50 21.15 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M N A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
081 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
9XP,
ENOTTURE CLAS$j FI 9 AT
PERSONAL
PERSONAL SERVICES 16,280.00 16,151.23 128.77 .79
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,700.00 70,884.64 184.64- .26 -
COMMODITIES 12.5Woo --642Lo- 48.00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS _V_ _4W
a- --23.n4-9?- 5.97 %
SOURCE OF
FUYM . . ........ .
GENERAL FUND 99A80,00 93,534,92., 5.945.08 5.97
5.97
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS ---?2.j9QjP----21,L3-492 5.97 %
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PFMOM WSSIFICATION
PALANCE
BALANCE
COMMUNITY GROUPS
42,700.00
44,027.36
1,327.36-
3.10 -
4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS, ET
41,600.00
37,767.14
3,832.86
9.21
HOLIDAY DECORATIONS
15,1 1R80.00
11 �740.42
3,439.58
22.65
PROGRAM TOTALS
93,534�9g _
4 .08
__I.0
5.97 %
9XP,
ENOTTURE CLAS$j FI 9 AT
PERSONAL
PERSONAL SERVICES 16,280.00 16,151.23 128.77 .79
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,700.00 70,884.64 184.64- .26 -
COMMODITIES 12.5Woo --642Lo- 48.00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS _V_ _4W
a- --23.n4-9?- 5.97 %
SOURCE OF
FUYM . . ........ .
GENERAL FUND 99A80,00 93,534,92., 5.945.08 5.97
5.97
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS ---?2.j9QjP----21,L3-492 5.97 %
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
6 U D G E T E X P E N 0 1 T U R E S U M N A R Y
5/01/91 — 1/31/92
082 LIBRARY SERVICES
BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMT ILPINDED BALANCE
LIBRARY OPERATIONS ?,.$23,655.00 OQ
Z.$, 655,00, 100.00
PROGRAM TOTALS 2,823,655.00 'DO.. 2,823,655.00 100.00 %
EXP5" ITURE CLA -SIFICATION
,-D $
,.
LIBRARY OPERATIONS 21423,655, AID 2,823,612,00 100.00
EXPENDITURE TOTALS2A23,1655192 .00 223,655.00 100.00
SOURCE 2F FUW,.
LIBRARY FUND 2,823a655,00— ----- ------- qL 2_ 123,655.00 iOO.oO
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2,923,655.00 2,823,655-00 100.00 %
V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T
8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
091 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDEA
EXPENDITURE TOTALS
A NC
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
1,468,995.00
1,421,963.27
47,031.73
3.20
SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS
84.990.00
84.987.50
2.50
.00
PROGRAM TOTALS
1 55�
1,506,950.77
47.034.23
3.02 X
EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION
DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
1.553,985.00
1,5106,950.77
47,Qp.?3 3.02
EXPENDITURE TOTALS
1.553.985.00
1,506.950.77
4034..23_ 3.02 %
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
43,725.00
29,149.84
14,575.16
33.33
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 11973
163,250.00
163,394.40
144.40-
.08 -
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974
258,000.00
257,940.00
60.00
.02
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS 8 & I
23,450.00
23,450.00
.00
.00
SSA #2 BLACKNAWK 8 & I
27,250.00
27,250.00
.00
.00
POLICE & FIRE BLDG 8 & I 1991A
143,515.00
142,370.58
1,144.42
.79
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & 119918
49,000.00
19,109.97
29,890.03
61.00
INSURANCE RESERVE B & 11987
102,990.00
102,987.50
2.50
.00
FLOOD CONTROL B & 11991A
103,305.00
102,041.07
1,263.93
1.22
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D
114,375.00
113,872.50
502.50
.43
P W FACILITY B & 119878
371,190.00
370,951.89
238.11
.06
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & 11987C
119,645.00
120,145.52
500.52-
.41 -
$SA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B & I
34,299.00
34 287.5
2 50
.00
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS'
1,553.985.00
1,506.950.77
47.034,233
3.02 %
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 5 P E C T
8 U 0 G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y
5/01/91 - 1/31/92
092 PENSION FUNDS
EXPENDITURK CLASSIFICATION
PENSION EXPENSE 1,157,600.00 834,516.52 323,093.48 27.90
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 1,157,600.00 834,516,52323.0$3.48 27.90 %
,-
SOURCE OF FUNDS
BUDGET
AMOUNT
BUDGET
PERCENT
PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION
AMOUNT
EXPENDED
BANgE
BALANCE
EMPLOYEE PENSIONS
36,600.00
27,450.45
9,149.55
24.99
POLICE PENSIONS
543,000.00
371,674.33
171,325.67
31.55
FIREMENS PENSIONS
57COW00
435,391.74
142M$.26
24.67
PROGRAM TOTALS
1,157,§N .00
$34,516.52
323,083,48
27.90 %
EXPENDITURK CLASSIFICATION
PENSION EXPENSE 1,157,600.00 834,516.52 323,093.48 27.90
EXPENDITURE TOTALS 1,157,600.00 834,516,52323.0$3.48 27.90 %
,-
SOURCE OF FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
10,600.00
7,948.98
2,651.02
25.00
BENEFIT TRUST #2
26,000.00
19,501.47
6,498.53
24.99
POLICE PENSION FUND
543,000.00
371,674.33
171,325.67
31.55
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
57COO AD
435,391.74
142,608.26
24.67
SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS
IJ57.6.W 00
834,516,52
323,003,48
27.90 %
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SFS ON ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
increasing the number of Class "S" liquor licenses by one (1) (Retro Bistro, Inc. d/b/a
Retro Bistro Restaurant, 1744 West Golf Road), so that hereafter said Subsection A of
Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows:
Section 13,107. Number -of Licenses
Two (2)
Class A Licenses
'1,o (2)
Class B licenses
Ten (10)
Class C licenses
One (1)
Class D license
Two (2)
Class E licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H License
One (1)
Class M License
One (1)
Class P Licenses
Nineteen (19)
Class R Licenses
Nine (9)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T license
Eight (8)
Class W Licenses
SEM.QL4 TWO, That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of
— , Village President
ruld
1992.
Class
Establis bent
Number
A
Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
2
B
Dumas Walker's Bar B Q Pit and Fish Shack;
Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Gold Eagle liquors; Jay Liquors;
Mt. Prospect Liquors; Osco Drugs; Phar-Mor;
Walgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens,
(Mt. Prospect Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
1
M
Holiday Inn
I
P
Shimada Sboten
I
R
Artemis; Boo 111; DJB Brunetti; Dragon City;
Edwardo's; Fellini; Giordano's (Rand Road);
Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan;
Izakaya Sankyu; little America; Magic Dragon Restaurant;
Nina Restaurant; Pepe's; Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise;
Torishin; Yasuke
19
S
El Sombrero; Emerson House; Jake's Pizza;
Jameson's Charbouse; Kampai; Old Orchard Country
Club Restaurant; Retro BistLQ: Sam's Place;
Wild Stallions Cafe
8
T
Thunderbird Lanes
I
W
Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut; Rosati's Pizza;
Sizzler Restaurant; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's
8
58
CAF/
1/29/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
OF THE VILLA
, --G
--E CODE OF MOUNT PROSPEC
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2006 entitled "No Parking Any Time"
of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Maple
St. West Btw. 197 ft. and 370 ft. south of the south line of
Busse Ave.".
SECTION TWO: That Section 18.2006 entitled "No Parking Any Time"
of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Maple
St. East Btw. 135 ft. and 175 ft. south of the south line of
Busse Ave.".
SECTION THREE: That Section 18.2006 entitled "No Parking Any Time"
of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Maple
St. East Btw. 50 ft. to 200 ft. north of Evergreen St.".
SECTION FOUR: That Section 18.2008 entitled "Weekday Parking" of
Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Maple
St. East 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. From point 240 ft. north of
Evergreen St. to Central Rd."
SECTION FIVE: That Section 18.2011.A entitled "Two Hour Parking"
of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Maple
St. East The first 50 ft. north of Evergreen Ave."
SECTION SIX: That Section 18.2011.B entitled "Two Hour Parking"
of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Maple
St. West Btw. Busse & Evergreen Aves., excluding the area from
a point 197 ft. south of the south line of Busse Ave., to a point
370 ft. south of south line of Busse Ave."
SECTION SEVEN: That Section 18.2005 entitled "No Stopping,
Standing or Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further adding
thereto in proper alphabetical sequence the following:
1! Name of Side of Between
Street Street Hours of Description
Maple St. East At any time Btw. Northwest Hwy.
& Central Rd. 11
CTION EIGHT: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
N
Chapter 18
Maple Street
Page 2 of 2
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet in the manner provided by.law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Vifiage'President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
, 1992.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE AGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1992
SUBJECT: ZBA-78-V-91, DIMUCCI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
LOCATION: 1710-84 GOLF RD. - MOUNT PROSPECT COMMONS SHOPPING CTR.
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for variations filed by DiMucci Development Corporation. The applicant is
requesting the following variations to allow an existing parking lot to remain as constructed:
1. Section 14.2002.E to allow a 0 ft. interior sideyard setback. Code requires 10'.
2. Section 14.2003 to allow 83% lot coverage. Code allows 75%
3. Section 14.3014 to allow 214 parking spaces. Code requires 215 parking
spaces.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of January 23, 1992.
At the meeting, Rick Filler and Anthony DiMucci provided evidence in support of the
request. Mr. Filler explained that the site plan had originally been approved with a 24 foot
landscaping area between the shopping center parking lot and Artemis Restaurant. During
construction, owners of Artemis indicated that the landscape separation fell within the area
of a lease agreement that the restaurant has with DiMucci Corporation, providing overflow
parking spaces. Mr. Filler stated that the landscape area was deleted as a result of this
lease agreement. Mr. DiMucci confirmed that the lease was entered into by his father, and
the company was not aware of the lease when the original site plan was prepared.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning, explained the variations and the details of the original
plan. He pointed out the lease area on a shopping center site plan. He explained that the
variations are necessary to allow the parking lot to remain as constructed. Mr. Clements
stated that, if the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of the request, it was
suggested that a condition be included to upgrade plant stock at key locations on the
shopping center property.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. Mr. Lannon and Mrs. Skowron
John Fulton Dixon
January 27, 1992
Page 2
believed that the landscape buffer could be moved west, to provide more green space. The
impact of this suggestions on existing parking was discussed. Mr. Saviano and Chairman
Basnik believed that staff could work with the petitioner to upgrade landscaping. They
could not support a reduction of parking spaces.
After discussion, it was the concurrence of the Zoning Board of Appeals that parking not
be reduced at the shopping center.
Accordingly, by a 5-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
following variations:
1. Section 14.2002.E to allow a zero ft. interior sideyard setback.
2. Section 14.2003 to allow 83% lot coverage.
3. Section 14.3014 to allow 214 parking spaces.
This recommendation is subject to the petitioner working with staff to upgrade or replace
plant quality at the shopping center.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
'MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 78-V-91
Hearing Date: December 12, 1991 and
January 23, 1992
PETITIONER:
DiMucci Development Corporation
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1710-84 Golf. Mt. Prosp. Commons Shop. Ctr.
PUBLICATION DATE:
November 26, 1991
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting the following
variations to allow an existing parking lot to
remain as constructed: 1) Section 14.2002.E to
allow a 0 ft. interior sideyard setback instead
of 10 ft.; 2) Section 14.2003 to allow 83% lot
coverage instead of 75%; 3) Section 14.3014
to allow 214 parking spaces instead of 215
parking spaces.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced the request and asked for representatives of the petitioner.
Mr. Rick Filler from the DiMucci Company introduced himself to the Zoning Board and
stated that the request was filed in order to authorize changes that were made in the field
to the approved plan. Mr. Filler stated that a 24 foot landscape setback between the
Artemis Restaurant and the Village Commons Shopping Center was deleted due to a
supplemental lease agreement with Artemis Restaurant providing them with overflow
parking. Mr. Filler stated that the 24 foot landscape island was replaced by a single curbline
in order to keep parking closer to the restaurant.
David Clements, Director of Planning, presented a staff summary of the request. Mr.
Clements concurred that the original site plan for the Mount Prospect Commons Shopping
Center provided a 24 foot wide landscape buffer between the shopping center parking lot
and the Artemis Restaurant. He indicated that this area was paved during construction,
because part of,this landscape area was in the boundaries of the lease agreement that Mr.
Filler had referred to, He stated Haat d
no landscaping and that the variations
constructed. Mr. Clements stated that t
setback for the parking lot, a lot_covera
variation of 1 space.
Mr. Clements continued and stated that
setback for a parking lot, and that the
landscaped island. He indicted that ren
coverage factor, and that parking was
Clements pointed out that the originaC
between the shopping center and the r
time because of the lease agreement wit]
that overall tate shopping center has j
landscaping and suggested dant, should t
of this request, the petitioner work witti
on the shopping center property.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then ;gener
the DiMucci Company Lawns both of the
problem for themselves.
Mrs. Skowron noted that she does not lik
each other at this key location near Golf
for the maximum number of parking sl
number that are required. She question
landscaping would be i csnnt.S
of moving the 24 foot landscape isles tr
and asked Mr. Clements how many space
Reviewing the site plan, Mr. Clements it
bays of parking with an estimate of 36 b
lands4ing at this location would enhan
Chairman Basnik asked the petitioner
upgrading the plant quality as indicated
Mr. Anthony.DiMuc i introduct
agree to upgrade landscaping as
history of the lease arrangemen
and that this. Company's files
construction, the ownership of
attempted to modify the parkin]
ZBA-78-V-91
January 23, 1992
Page'2 of 4
that now separates the two parcels has
y to allow the parking lot to remain as
is include a zero foot interior sideyard
a to permit 83%, and a minor parking
used the request. Mr" Lannon mated that
and that, in effect they had created the
pearance of the two parking lots abutting
;he indicated that it is necessary to design
it maybe this center does not need the
ny spaces lost as a result of moving this
and Mr. Lannon discussed the possibility
st to provide some separation and buffer,
be lost.
d that the 24 foot island would replace two
lost. Mrs. Skowron started that additional
comer.
y would be willing to work with staff on
staff report.
to the Zoning Board and. stated that he would
and he provided further background as to the
ed that the lease was entered into by his father
show this supplemental agreement During
Restaurant pointed this out and Mr. DiMucci
u to accommodate the lease.
ZBA-78-V-91
January 23, 1992
Page 3 of 4
Mrs.. Skowron questioned the lot, coverage and indicated that it would be her preference to
have more green space on the shopping Winter property, rather than upgrading the plant
stock. Mrs. Skowroa and Mr. Lannon questioned Mr. Clements on the existing lot coverage
at the shopping center. Mr. Clements indicated that the 81% figure that is shown on the
staff report was a result of calculations done at the time that this application was filed. He
stated that staff went back and reviewed the original budding permit in an attempt to find
calculations for the shopping center that were done at the time of permit approval. Mr.
Clements stated that there are no actual calculations for lot coverage in the permit file but
that calculations done with this application provide 81%.
Mr. Saviano noted that increasing green space at the shopping center would provide bonding
decrease in parking, and he was concerned at arbitrarily reducing parking. He suggested
that staff work with the petitioner on improvements to plant stock and upgrades. Mrs.
Skowron stated that she would rather review a ,parking variation than a lot coverage
variation for the property.
Mr. Lannon suggested that perhaps the application could be deferred so the petitioner and
staff could work on alternatives. Mr. Brettrager indicated that this would require a re-
publication to carry over the request. Mr. Saviano again noted that the Zoning Board was
malting a recommendation to the Village Board and he believed it was appropriate for the
staff to work with the petitioner to present a plan to the Board.
Mr. Lannon believed that it was important that the Zoning Board express their opinion on
lot coverage to the Village Board, and pointed out that as best as he could recall there had
not been any lot coverage variations for commercial properties.
Mrs. Skowron again emphasized that she believed there should be some sort of buffer
between the two parking lots.
Mr. Clements then presented an overview of the landscaping islands on the property and
indicated that the spacing of the parking lot islands was appropriate throughout the site and
that only one possible place seemed to be available to provide additional green space. Mr.
Clements pointed out this location on the plan and stated it would result in a reduction of
14 parking spaces.
Chairman Basnik and Mr. Lannon both had a concern with taking away parking at the
location described by Mr. Clements and noted that peak parking at the restaurant often is
necessary at this location. Mr. Fuller noted that the spaces described by Mr. Clements are
fully utilized by the restaurant and evening hours and that it would not be reasonable to
provide landscaping at this point.
Chairman Basnik then indicated that he would prefer to bring this matter, to a close at this
public hearing and requested a motion on the request.
Mr. Saviano moved that the Zoning Boa
interior sideyard setback, 83% lot coverN
Board subject to the petitioner working,
shopping center as recommended by stat
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon,
NAYS: Skowron
Motion carried by a vote of 5.1
This recommendation will be forwarded
ZBA-78-V-91
January 23, 1992
Page 4 of 4
of Appeals recommend approval of a zero foot
nd a parking variation of 1 space to the Village
i staff to upgrade or replace plant stock in the
[be motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
iano, Cassidy, Brettrager and Basnik
the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully Submitted,
David M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT-PROSOECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: JULIE FARNHAM, PLANNER
DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-78-V-91
APPLICANT: DI MUCCI DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
ADDRESS: 1710-84 GOLF ROAD
MOUNT PROSPECT COMMONS SHOPPING CENTER
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Business Retail and Service
LOT SIZE: Approximately 5.6 acres
% COVERAGE: 93%
F -A -R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUE
The applicant is requesting the following variations to allow an existing parking lot to
remain as constructed:
1. Section 14.2002.E to allow a 0 ft. interior sideyard setback. Code requires 10 ft.
2. Section 14.2003 to allow 83% lot coverage. Code allows 75%
3. Section 14.3014 to allow 214 parking spaces. Code requires 215 parking spaces.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMEM AND CONCERN
Summary of application: The site plan originally approved for Mount Prospect Commons
Shopping Center included a 24 ft. wide landscape buffer between the shopping center and
Artemis Restaurant parking lots. This area was paved during construction because part of
the landscaped area is within the boundaries of a lease agreement with Artemis Restaurant.
The agreement allows Artemis Restaurant to use this area for parking. The applicant states
that they were not aware that the boundaries of the lease area overlapped the shopping
center lot at the time the site plan was developed. As constructed, a curb separates the
restaurant and shopping center parking lots. The variations are necessary to allow the
parking lot to remain as constructed.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Mount Prospect Commons Shopping
Center was constructed about two years ago. However, the parking lot was not constructed
in accordance with the approved plan. Following is a brief description of the variations
requested:
1. &rking 1Qt setback of zero feet from an interior lot line. The Zoning Ordinance
requires a 10 ft. setback. The parking lot was constructed without any separation in
the pavement between Artemis Restaurant lot and the shopping center. A concrete
curb separates the two lots, however, one row of parking stalls for Artemis is actually
on the shopping center lot. These spaces are part of a lease agreement between
DiMucci and the restaurant.
The approved site plan indicated a 24 ft. wide landscaped buffer along the east
property line. However, this was never installed once it occupied space within the
boundaries of the lease agrement. The zero foot setback requested would allow the
parking lot to remain as constructed without the required 10 ft. separation between
the lots. Staff notes that while the properties are separate lots, they are both owned
by the DiMucci Company.
2. Lot coyeragt of 83%, The Zoning Ordinance allows a maximum of 75%. Upon
review of this application, staff determined that the property was developed at an
83% lot coverage. The 24 ft. landscape buffer would reduce lot coverage to 81%.
This additional paving should not substantially increase the amount of stormwater
run-off, but revised detention calculations should be submitted.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
I prove -ding ZA_WtUZb=L The Zoning ordinance requires 215 spaces. Staff
notes that 214 spaces are available on-site. This is a minor variation and should not
adversely affect the parking supply for the shopping center.
Engineering and inspection Services requests that "as -built" detention volume calculations
and engineering drawings be submitted for review, Engineering also noted that the
applicant might want to consider a shared access agreement between the two lots (Artemis
Restaurant and Mount Prospect Commons). However, staff notes that the applicant owns
both lots and there may not be any need for such an agreement unless one lot were sold to
another owner.
The originally approved 24 ft. landscape buffer would make an ideal separation between the
shopping center and the restaurant. However, this buffer cannot be provided due to the
lease agreement with Artemis. Provided that the petitioner adequately demonstrates the
restrictions of this lease agreement, staff has no objections. to this request.
Overall, the shopping center has good planter islands and buffer with adequate landscaping.
Should the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of the request, it is
recommended that the petitioner work with the staff to upgrade plant quality in several
locations. Also, as -built engineering drawings should be submitted for review as soon as
porssible.
JF:hg
Approved:
CAF
2/11/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1710 - 1784 WEST GOLF ROAD
WHEREAS, Di Mucci Development Corporation (hereinafter referred to
as Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
generally located at 1710 - 1784 West Golf Road, (hereinafter
referred to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Di Mucci's Resubdivision of Lot 2, except that part thereof
taken form the widening of Busse Road, in the division of the
Louis F. Busse Farm, being a division of the Northeast 1/4
(except the West 686.40 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of said
Northeast 1/4) of Section 15, Township 41 North, Range 11,
East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks the following:
1. A variation from Section 14.2002.E to allow a 0 foot interior
sideyard setback, rather than the 10 feet required;
2. A variation from Section 14.2003 to allow 63% lot coverage,
rather than the permitted 75%; and
3. A variation from Section 14.3014 to allow 214 parking spaces,
rather than the 215 requiring.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 78-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 12th day of
December, 1991, and the 23rd day of January, 1992, pursuant to due
and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald
on the 26th day of November, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 78-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SEgTION ONB_1 The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of'the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO; The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the
following:
1. A variation from Section 14.2002.E to allow a 0 foot interior
sideyard setback for an existing parking lot.
2. A variation from Section 14.2003 to allow 83% lot coverage
3. A variation from Section 14.3014 to allow 214 parking spaces.
SEgTION THREE: That the variations granted herein are subject to
the Petitioner providing appropriate upgrading of landscaping, as
approved by the Department of Planning & Zoning.
SECTION FOUR: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
2�,
SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
ordinance.
SECTION SIX, This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
GOLF ROAD
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PIANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER hyZ'
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1992
SUBJECT- ZBA-3-V-92, STEVEN J. GALASSINI
LOCATION: 909 TOWER LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Steven Galassini of 909 Tower Lane. The variation
was filed to allow a chimney to encroach 24 inches into a sideyard rather than the 18 inches
allowed by the Zoning Ordinance.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of January 23. At
the meeting, Steven Galassini presented evidence in support of the request. He explained
that the variation would allow a 24 inch foundation for support of the two-story chimney,
and that this was better support than the 18 inches permitted by the Zoning Ordinance.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning, explained that this was a minor variation, and would
have no impact on the adjoining property.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request, and there were no serious
issues raised. It was noted that the adjoining property owner was not present to object to
the request.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a 24 inch encroachment into a sideyard at 909 Tower Lane, to allow
construction of a chimney.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 3-V-92 Hearing Date: January 23, 1992
PETITIONER: Steven J. and Deborah F. Galassini
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 909 Tower Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: January 11, 1992
REQUEST: Variation of Section 14.1102.D2 to permit a
chimney to encroach 24 inches into a required
side yard, rather than 18 inches as permitted by
the Zoning Ordinance.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
The petitioner, Steven Galassird, introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and
stated that the application was filed to allow a chimney to encroach 24 inches into a
required sideyard, rather than the 18 inches allowed by the Zoning Ordinance. He indicated
he would like to construct a fireplace in an existing family room, and that the 6 inch
variation is necessary to accommodate the foundation for the two-story fireplace chimney.
Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board of Appeals and
indicated that the Zoning Ordinance permits an 18 inch encroachment into a sideyard, and
that this request was filed to allow a 24 inch encroachment into the 6W required sideyard.
He stated that the applicants are proposing to build a fireplace in an existing family room.
He stated that the family room is located behind the two -car garage of this two-story house.
Mr. Clements noted that the fireplace chimney would have no impact on surrounding
properties as the chimney would be located inside the line of an existing service walk on the
petitioner's property, and that this service walk seems to define the usable portion of the
sideyard. Therefore, Mr. Clements believed that there would be no impact on the
neighboring property. 'Mr. Clements also noted that the Inspection Service Department
pointed out that a 24" dimension for the foundation and chimney would allow the chimney
to be constructed without doing substantial modifications to the roof trusses to accommodate
the construction. Mr. Clements recommend
stating that in researching other suburban zor
encroachment, such as this, and that perhap,
The Zoning Board of Appeals then discussW
or objections to the 6" encroachment. Mr. L
the neighbor to the south, and Mr. Galassi
questioned why such a minor item needed
Aasnik asked if the chimney had a bend in tt
a straight vertical chimney.
Mr. Clements also indicated that this request
approval.
Mr. Lannon then moved that the Zoning B(
No. ZBA-3-V-92 to allow a 24",encroachmen
motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Unon Roll Call: AYES: Brettragi
ZBA-3-V-92
January 23, 1992
Page 2
ipproval of the request and concluded by
ordinances, many communities allow a W
s is a change that should be examined.
request and there were no majorconcerns,
as asked if the petitioner had spoken with
adicated that they,had no objection, and
,o through a public hearing process. Mr.
ructure, and Mr. Galassini stated that it is
have to go to the Village Board for final
of Appeals recommend approval of Case
D a required sideyard rather than 18". The
Cassidy, Lannon, Saviano, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
DAVID M. CLEMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PIANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK4 CHAT
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
JANUARY 14, 1992.
CASE NO.:
ZBA-3-V-92
APPLICANT:
STEVEN J. GALASSIN]
ADDRESS:
909 TOWER LANE
LOCATION MAP:
809
k,, ORCHARD
rn r' J'n E81 3
Cq N C4 CN
.17 q- C'4 010 'T 04
SUNSET
a
..SUNSET
9 0 901
ON
9 00
C
903
9 3902 912
902
9135--- 905
907
904 904
905 Cc 907 907
904 906
906 5 ') (-) 9
0 9 906
907
, 09
909
3: A 908 1 908
908 0. 910 13 910 �911
911js
910
913 912
913 'Q
9121
C�
C7,
915 914
TOWER OR
917
919 916
0 N N N c, at
921
jOCYNT p1toSPEC7 CORP. uv-IT5 .' GOLF Z)
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION*
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.&—R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a chimney to encroach 24" into a required
sideyard. Section 14.1102.13.2 allows a chimney to encroach 18" into a required sideyard.
Summary of application: The applicants are proposing to building a fireplace in an existing
family room The family room is located behind the two -car garage. The fireplace chimney
would encroach 24" into the 6-6" required sideyard, and project above the roof line of the
two-story house. The petitioner indicates that, because of foundation requirements for the
fireplace, and the need for the chimney to not impact the second story and eaves, the 6"
encroachment is necessary.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The house is built at the minimum setback
requirement, as is the house to the south. The chimney would be located inside an existing
sidewalk. The sidewalk appears to help define the useable part of the required sideyard.
Therefore, it is not believed that the additional 6" encroachment would have any impact on
the neighboring structure.
DEPARTMENTAL COMMENTS
No major objections or comments were raised by other Village Departments. Inspection
Services points out that the 24" dimension would prevent the petitioner from modifying the
roof trusses to accommodate the chimney.
SIMMRX49ECOMMENDATIO
Staff recommends approval of this minor request. It should be noted that research into
our revised Zoning Ordinance finds many communities permit a 24" encroachment into a
required sideyard. We may look at such a change.
DMC:hg
CAF
12/11/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 909 TOWER LANE
WHEREAS, Steven J. and Deborah F. Galassini (hereinafter referred
to as Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for
property commonly known as 909 Tower Lane (hereinafter referred to
as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 75 in Country Club Terrace, a subdivision of part of Lots
16 and 18 in Owner's Subdivision of Section 13, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
according to the plat thereof recorded May 20, 1955 as
Document No. 16243657 in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.D.2 to
allow a chimney to encroach twenty-four inches (2411) into the
required side yard, rather than the 1811 permitted; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 3-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 23rd day of
January, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the MoUnt Prospect Heral!ft on the 7th day of January, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 3-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102.D.2 to allow a chimney to 'encroach into the
side yard by twenty-four inches (24"), rather than 1811 as permitted
by the Zoning Ordinance.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
ZBA 3-V-92
Page 2 of 2
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
COUNTRY :LUB ERRALE, A SUBDIVISION 0,- PART OF LOTS 16 AND 18 IN OWNER'S SUBDIV71S
3, IOWNSilF 4; NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, AC(-ORDINC qo
EOF-RECCkDED i, Y 20, 1955 AS DOCUMENT N0. 16,243,657, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
7—^ its p- p /1 0-
LA/
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
pLVjMNG AND Zoning Board of AppealsONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO; JOHN F. DIXON, VILLA CNAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1992
SUBJECT. ZBA-4-V-92, MARC A. JENSEN
LOCATION: 106 NORTH EMERSON STREET
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Marc Jensen of 106 North Emerson. The application
was filed to reduce the 5 foot required sideyard to 2 1/2 feet to allow construction of a
detached two -car garage.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of January 23. At
the meeting, Robert Jensen, father of the petitioner, presented information that his son
would like to construct the garage 2 1/2 feet from the lot line, in order to save usable rear
yard space on this 50 foot lot.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request. It was noted that it is reasonable to
reduce the sideyard for garages on 50 foot lots, to save rear yard area. It was also found
that the neighbors have a detached garage at a similar setback. However, this garage is on
the opposite lot line, so the structures will not be adjoining. This request should have no
impact on the neighbor's property.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a variation to reduce the 5 foot sideyard to 2 1/2 feet to allow a detached
garage to be constructed at 106 North Emerson Street.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 4-V-92
Hearing Date: January 23, 1992
PETITIONER:
Marc A. Jensen
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
106 North Emerson Street
PUBLICATION DATE:
January 11, 1992
REQUEST:
Variation of the accessory structure standards
of Section 14.1023.2 of Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance to permit a detached garage to be
constructed 2-1/2 ft. from a side lot line rather
than the 5 ft. required by the Zoning Ordinance-
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Robert Jensen introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals stating that he is
representing his son, Mare Jensen with this request. Mr. Jensen stated that the application
had been filed to allow a detached garage to be located 2 1/2 feet from a side lot line to
allow more yard space behind the existing house.
Chairman Basnik asked if there was any further testimony by the petitioner, and then as$ed
for the staff summary.
Mr. Clements summarized the request and indicated that the subject property is a typical
50 foot lot and that the proposal for a 21/2 foot sideyard is an effort to maintain as much
usable rear yard behind the home as possible on this narrow lot. He indicated that this is
not an unusual request and that there are a number of garages with reduced sideyards
throughout this particular neighborhood. He noted that there would be no impact on the
property to the north, as this property has a detached garage, but that this structure is
located on the north lot line which is opposite of the location of the petitioner's garage. Mr.
Clements recommended approval of the request and stated that a garage is desirable and
that this is a characteristic that is often experienced on 50 foot lots.
ZBA-4-V-92
January 23, 1992
Page 2
Mr. Cassidy asked if the property currently'hd a garage, and Mr. Jensen stated that there
is no garage. He also added that this would be a tan ,garage. Mr. Basnik noted that this
application is typical to_many others that lave been filed on 50 foot lots, and asked Mr.
Clements about the adequate amount of sideyard for such a structure. Mr. Clements
indicated that a 2 1/2' to 3' sideyard would allow access to the side of the structure for
maintenance and for any work under the eaves, for example.
Mr. Cassidy then moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve a 2 1/2 foot sideyard
at 106North Emerson. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Saviano, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully Submitted,
DAVID M. CLEMENTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK,
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 14, 1"2
CASE NO.: ZRA-4V-92
APPLICANT: MARC A. JENSEN
ADDRESS: 106 NORTH EMERSON STREET
LOCATION MAP:
201
[:jq�260 . I ]
200__j
6 THAYER 57.
123
122,
123 122
20
117
117
116
121
11
118
119 118
115
114
117
117 116
113
112
11
14
113 114
ill
110
113
112
ill 112
109
108
ill
10
10
11 110
109 108
107
106
1
107
1q7 06
5104
105
104
105 104
103
102
103
101
102
103 102
101
100
101 100
100
6, HENRY 5-r
21 23
21
24
23 22
21 20
23
21
16
14
22
11
17
17
20
8
- 18
19 16
19
17
12
z
R
16
17
12
5
10
9
14
15
8
13
1 3
11
8
7
10
6
7
6
5
6
7
5
4
5
5
3N
3
4
3
2
3
2
" I
1
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
1A)T SIZE- 7,621 sq. R.
% COVERAGE: 42%
F-A—R.: 0.17
Oil Bashi, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting a variation to allow a detached garage to be constructed 2-1/2
ft. from a side lot tine. Section 14.102.8 of the Zoning Ordinance requires a detached
garage to be 5 ft. from a side lot line.
Summary of application: The petitioner intends to construct a two -car detached garage in
their backyard. Presently, the house does not have a garage. The petitioner notes that a
conforming 5 ft- sideyard would reduce the useable rear yard behind the house, by placing
the garage towards the middle of the 50 ft. wide lot.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The property to the north abutting the garage location
has a detached garage, but it is located near the north lot line, away from the petitioner's
garage. The neighbor's garage is at a reduced setback, as are many detached garages on
50 ft. wide lots.
No major objections were raised by other Village Departments. inspection Services notes
that information on grading and drainage will be necessary with the building permit.
Staff recommends approval of the request. A garage is desirable, and on a 50 ft. lot, we
frequently see sideyard variation requests in order to maximize useable yard space behind
the house. Reduced sideyards for detached garages are prevalent in this neighborhood, so
the request is consistent with existing conditions.
DMC:hg
CAF
2/12/92
ORDINANCE NO.
ANORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
WHEREAS, Marc A. Jensen (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 106 North Emerson Street (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 116 in Laudermilk Villa, being a subdivision in the
southeast 1/4 of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East
of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to
allow a detached garage to be constructed two feet six inches (21
611) from the side lot line, rather than the required 5 feet; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 4-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 23rd day of
January,' 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the on the 7th day of January, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
further consideration to the variation
of the Village have given ined that the
interests
einthe subect of ZBA 4-V-92 and have m
best
jdeter
of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
ffffi�%Mndings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the he Subject Property a variation
e to be
from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a detached gara
constructed two feet six inches (21 611) from the side logline
t , as
shown on the Site Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A".
u9MR-MEE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
-4- in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
shall rem
=QT19A-z1V--rj-
of Chapter 14
shall be null
begins within
ordinance.
In accordance
of the Village
and void unless
one (1) year
with the provisions of Section 14.604
Code, the variations granted herein
permits are issued and construion
from the date of passage ofctthis
SM This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
M1Q1-9B• -
ZBA 4-V-92
Page 2 of 2
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
/4wlv4o ceaw
EMERSON ST
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
101"UNG AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILIAG ER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, D11 MOIR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 27, 1M
SUBJECT.. ZBA-6-V-92, RICHARD AUER, (PROSPECT MOBIL)
LOCATION: 150 NORTH RIVER ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Richard Auer, the operator of Prospect Mobil at 1.500
North River Road. The application was filed allow to the construction of a self-service
canopy that would reduce the 30 foot front yard to 6 feet.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of January 23, At
the meeting, Mr. Auer presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that he
would like to erect a canopy over existing pump islands. The canopy would provide lighting
and weather protection for self-service customers. The upright canopy supports would be
at the same location as the pump islands, but that the edge of the canopy would project to
within 6 feet of the front property line. However, the canopy would be 14'-6" above grade.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request, and noted that the canopy and its
supports would not cause a sight -line problem for traffic leaving the station and entering
River Road. The Zoning Board of Appeals also noted a similar request recently approved
at 2020 Euclid.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a variation to reduce the 30 foot front yard to 6 feet to allow the
construction of a canopy.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 6-V-92 Hearing Date: January 23, 1992
PETITIONER: Richard Auer, Prospect Mobil
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1500 North River Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
January 11, 1992 -
Variation of Section 14.2002 of Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance to reduce the 30 ft. required
front yard to 6 ft. to allow the installation of a
self-service canopy over existing gasoline pumps.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Dennis Saviano
Michaele Skowron
Richard Pratt
None
Mr. Richard Auer introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals as the petitioner with
this case, and stated he is the operator of the Mobil Station at 1500 North River Road. Mr.
Auer indicated that he would like to construct a self-service canopy over the existing pump
islands at his station to provide convenience for customers and weather protection as well
as increase lighting. He stated that the canopy would project into the required front yard
on River Road.
Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report and indicated that the location of the pumps
dictates the final location of the canopy and necessitates the variation. He stated that the
upright canopy supports will be located 17 feet from the front lot line, but that the edge of
the canopy will be 6 feet from the front lot line on River Road. Mr. Clements stated that
the gas station is non -conforming as to setbacks and lot coverage and that the canopies will
not contribute to any additional stormwater run-off. He indicated that the vertical canopy
supports will not block visibility of the River Road traffic as automobiles exit the gas station,
and that the canopy 14'-6" above grade will also not create a sight -line problem. Mr.
Clements stated that the canopy Will upgrade the facility and provide weather protection for
customers, and that the staff would recommend approval to the Zoning Board of Appeals.
He also noted that this is similar to a case recently approved by the Zoning Board at 2020
Euclid Avenue.,
ZBA-6-V-92
January 23, 1992
Page 2
The Zoning Board of Appeals then discussed, the request, and Mr. Cassidy asked if there
would be any locations on the property where landscaping could be provided, Mr. Clement$
noted that there might be areas where landscaping could be provided along Camp
McDonald Road.
Mr. Brettrager voted that the operator of the station had made some improvements recently
and he urged them to continue. He stated that railroad timbers and planters had been
installed at the station to 'improve the appearance.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals,recornmend approval of a variation to
allow a canopy to be located 6 feet from the front lot line on River Road. The motion was
seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Saviano, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully Submitted,
DAVID M. CLEMENTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
NANNWG MD ZONING DEPARTWNT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIrM.N
V
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
JANUARY 14, IM
CASE NO.:
ZBA-6-V-92
APPLICANT:
RICHARD AUER, (PROSPECT MOBIL)
ADDRESS:
1500 NORTH RIVER ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
61
1701
WOODWEW
612
1613
1608
60
1611
1,609
60
o
1509
1507
1505
1503
04
1501
f CAMP MC DO"A to
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Business Retail Sales & Service
LOT SIZE: ISW0251 = 18,750 sq. It.
% COVERAGE: no change - wdsting non -conformity
F.A.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting a variation to reduce the 30 ft. required front yard of Section
14.2002 to 6 ft. to allow the installation of a canopy over existing gasoline pumps at 1500
North River Road.
Summary of application: The location of the pumps dictates the canopy location, and
necessitates the variation. The upright canopy supports will be located at the same 17 ft.
setback as the pump islands, but the edge of the canopy will be 6 ft. from the front lot line
on River Road.
Impact on Surrounding Properties: The gas station is non -conforming as to setbacks and
lot coverage. The lot is entirely paved, so the proposed canopies will not contribute to
additional lot coverage. As stated, the canopy support columns will be at the same 17 ft.
setback as the pump islands. These vertical support columns will not block visibility of
River Road traffic as automobiles exit the gas station. In addition, the bottom of the canopy
will be 14'-6" above grade, also not blocking visibility.
No comments were received by other Village Departments.
The proposed canopy will upgrade the facility and provide weather protection for customers.
Staff recommends approval of the request, as the encroachment into the front yard does not
block visibility, and there is no reasonable way to construct the canopies to meet the 30 ft.
setback requirement. Also, the case is similar to canopies approved in September at 2020
Euclid Avenue. Lastly, the petitioner should note the signage on the canopies needs to be
checked for compliance with the Sip Ordinance.
DMC:hg
CAF
2/12/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1500 NORTH RIYER ROAD
WHEREAS, Richard Auer (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
1500 North River Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
That portion of Lot "All in Woodview Manor Unit 2, being a
Subdivision of part of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 24,
Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois, described as follows:
Starting in the Southeast corn of said Lot "A" as a point of,
beginning; thence in a Westerly direction along the Southerly
line of Lot "All 125 feet; thence in a Northeasterly direction
parallel with the Easterly line of Lot "A" 150 feet; thence
in an Easterly direction parallel with the Southerly line of
Lot "All 125 feet to a point on the Easterly line of Lot "A"
150 feet in a Northeasterly direction from the point of
beginning; thence along said Easterly line 150 feet to the
point of beginning, all in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.2002 to allow
a six foot (61) front yard, rather than the required 30 feet, in
order to allow the installation of a canopy over the existing self-
service gasoline pumps; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 6-V-92 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 23rd day of
January, 1992, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the on the 7th day of January, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 6-V-92 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTIOLT_QNE: The recitals' set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.2002 to allow a six foot (6') front yard, rather
than the required 30 feet, in order to allow the installation of
a canopy over the existing self-service gasoline pumps, as shown
as the Site Plan attached hereby and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
STN THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
a
ZBA 6-V-92
Page 2 of 2
SECT
, _ION FIVE,• In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
ordinance.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
,1992.
ki
a; .:' VACANT .✓
*� d"aa � �� ane4s4 u: � ,4.4� .. r �• . ur + � Sr
Q�w Via_9
dd A +n
t
4 � Q)
r
CJ � `gym• � �
LOT
1L'.'
T�l•,v �rr yr �� y Jy .V
1` � c� Y MOM�4 ! � 2•
it
123 ocr'
svt o —
ba'r+A
�`�' „��, „� _.. Q C A/� i.) ;✓1.�r'a+�—r�' �, . ,mr+rpwryt arP' pAW/1,fWMlA'aOAMr Yrwl
abtr 'aiaMt�w CI4fwN,m ✓gWxr'i7NmrWama ,,YN,,�r• WA4ma.4nANvyytMAAmY-a.tiuMNF{wMa�r ,vr4liN4a'rmMMal4IrT4FMNyyr
md9HrKr. NaWtIiNroMMNm/rm
D R
04k:a yll l1
AREA124501 50/9ys0.1292 AYAf S1Iw
t
urr
ArgWN AS:
N4� CaANLN a*' CAN• r.0ONA40 N.P.: AMAPI RD, row T rtwt7mr w+', Si+ir+r a 1r+M ; rtl�'m ♦:
u M7, abRosrfC9,I4uNors.s
eP a�IV+
CAF/
2/12/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3777
PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF AND
KENSINGTON ROADS MOUNT PROSPECT, IL IO
WHEREAS, NTN Bearing (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed a petition for an amendment to a Planned Unit Development
with respect to property commonly known as 1600 Bishop Court,
generally located at the Northwest Corner of Wolf and Kensington
Roads within the Kensington Center for Business (hereinafter
referred to as the Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 807 in Kensington Center Resubdivision 28, a Resubdivision
of Lots 803 and 805 in Kensington Center - Resubdivision 21,
in part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 35, Township 42
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
according to the plat thereof filed January 10, 1990 as
Document LR 3852830, excepting from said Lot 805 that part
thereof lying Northeasterly of a straight line drawn from a
point in the North line of Said Lot which is 20 feet West of
the Nor East corner of said Lot 805 to a point in the East
line of said Lot which is 20 feet south of said North East
corner of Lot 805, taken for highway, all in Cook County,
Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to the Planned Unit
Development to permit two free-standing signs to be located on the
perimeter berm of the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for an amendment
to the Planned Unit Development (designated as Sign 21-91) before
the Sign Review Board of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 16th
day of December, 1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 6th day of December,
1991; and
WHEREAS, the Sign Review Board has submitted its findings on the
proposed request to the President and Board of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be served by the granting the
request being the subject of Sign 21-91.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That SECTION TWO of Ordinance No. 3777, granting a
Planned Unit Development for the Subject Property, as amended by
Ordinance No. 4065, is hereby amended by adding thereto paragraph
n; so that hereinafter said SECTION TWO of Ordinance No. 3777 shall
include the following:
n. That one free-standing sign 7.8 feet in height shall be
permitted on the perimeter landscape berm on Kensington
Road, and one free-standing sign 7.8 feet in height shall
be permitted on the perimeter landscape berm on Wolf
Road. both such signs shall be installed on a brick
monument base to match the color of the building. 11
I
SECTION TffREE, This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1992.
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO. 4065
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3777
GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER
WOLF AND KENSINGTON ROADS, MO NT PROSPECT ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, Opus Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner")
has filed a petition for an amendment to a Special Use with respect
to property generally located on the northwest corner of Wolf and
Kensington Roads (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property");
and located within the Kensington Center for Business; and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 805 in Kensington Center Resubdivision 21, in part of
Northwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 42 North,Range
11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, per plat thereof
filed for record in the office of the Registrar of Titles,
April 20, 1988, as L. R. #3701855, excepting from said Lot
805 the following described property taken for highway by
Court Case No. 87 L 51410 - beginning at the northeast
corner of said Lot 805; thence south along the east line
of said Lot, being also the west line of Wolf Road, 20.0
feet; thence northwesterly 28.37 feet to a point in the
north line of said Lot 805, being also the south line of
Kensington Road, which point is 20.0 feet west of the
point of beginning; thence east along north line of said
Lot, 20.0 feet to the point of beginning, all in Cook
County, Illinois.
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to the Special Use approved
by the President and Board of Trustees through the adoption of
Ordinance No. 3777, passed and approved May 5, 1987 to permit two
4 -story office buildings with a total of 180,660 square feet of
gross floor area, rather than one 4 -story office building with a
maximum gross floor area of 165,000, and, to permit a 345 foot
building setback from Kensington Road, instead of the previously
approved 485 feet.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for amendment to
a Special Use (designated as ZBA Case No. 25 -SU -88) before the
zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the
lith day of May, 198, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Herald On the 26th day of April,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect, which recommendation is to grant the
requested amendment to a Special Use;
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have given further consideration to the requests
herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of
the Village and,that the granting of the amendment to the Special
ZBA 24 -SU -89
Page 2 of 2
Use governing the Subject Property would be in the best interest
of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That SECTION TWO of ordinance No. 3777 is hereby
amended by deleting therefrom the following language "to construct
a four (4) story office building with a maximum height of fifty-
five feet (551) and a maximum gross floor area of one hundred
sixty-five thousand (165,000) square feet" and substituting
therefor the following:
"...to construct two 4 -story office buildings with a maximum
height of fifty-five feet (551) and to provide a maximum gross
floor area for both buildings to one hundred eighty thousand six
hundred and sixty (180,660) square feet.."
SECTION THREE: That ordinance No. 3777 is hereby further amended
by granting a side yard setback from Kensington Read of three
hundred forty-five feet (3451), as shown on the Revised Site Plan,
a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof
as Exhibit "A".
SECTION FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Arthur
PASSED and APPROVED this rth day of July 1989.
Gald L.'Farley
Village President /Z
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
OnoImAmco NO. 17-77
AN oRozmamco oaamTzmo A SPECIAL USE FOR THE
eROgonrY C0xwOmLr um0vN AS mOmzeWosT CmamoR or
WOLF ROAD AND F8OoamVzLLE DRIVE IN uomsImGTOm
CENTER IN THE VILLAGE Or MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
WHEREAS, Opus Corporation has filed a petition for a special
use with respect to the property commonly known as the
Northwest corner of wolf Road and Feebauville Drive in
Kensington Center, in the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
(the "Subject Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is described as follows;
The East 540 feet of Lot 801 in Kensington Center -
Phase Six, a subdivision in pact of the North half
of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range ll, oast of
the Third Principal Meridian, per plat thereof filed
for record in the office of the Registrar of Titles
of Cook County, Illinois, murob 21, 1986 as LR#3502998
and also recorded as Document #86-159151, all in cook
County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a special use to aIImv a Planned
Unit Development and a waiver of ten percent (10o) of the
bonus requirement for off-street parking on the Subject
Property in accordance with Section 14.2500 of Article XxVof
Chapter 14 of the village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held no the variation request
(designated as Case No. oBA 8-3O-87) before the Zoning Board
of Appeals in the village of Mount Prospect on the 12tb day
of March, 1987, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the 'Mount Prospect Herald on the 24th day of
o
February, 1987; ad
WB8aEeS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its
findings and recommendations in favor of the proposed special
use subject to certain conditions to the President and Board
of Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have given
further consideration to the said request and have determined
that the aa -me meets the standards set forth in Section 14,704
of Article ozz pertaining to special use of said Chapter 14
of the village Code and have further determined that the
granting of the proposed special use would be in the best
interest of the public, provided the same are accomplished
pursuant to the conditions hereinafter set forth.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT 0moAzNuo BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES or THE nzLLuma OF moomz puoSpEcz, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS, AS roLLwvG:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and
Board of Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect.
Page 2
8Ba 8 -SU -87
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the
t eroagect hereby grant to the Subject
,^��=y= ~^ '`~umi�l use �o allow �h
Property a special thereon a Planned Unit
Development for the subject pr»pertu�to construct a four (4) o� fifty-five
height story office building with a maximum hundred
feet (551) and a maximum gross floor area of one
sixty-five thousand (165,000) square feet subject to the
following conditions:
a~ A maximum fifty-five feet (55') high to top of
parapet;
b. The height of the penthouse shall not exceed
approximately nine feet (9');
C. oecmiog along Wolf and Kensington Roads to screen
parking shall be required;
d Petitioner shall install conduit under wolf Road
^ and work out the costs for lighting with staff;
e^ The materials and color scheme should be similar
to that used for the existing 4 story building;
fThis building will be connected to an existing
~ twelve inch (12") sanitary sewer on the South side
of FeebaovilIe Drive;
b
g^ All storm water and overland drainage shall be
diverted to the existing detention basin at the
Southeast corner of the lot. No direct drainage
to the creek shall be allowed. No filling of the
floodplain shall be allowed;
h^ There is an existing eight ioob (g") stub with a
valve and vault from the sixteen inch (16") water -
main on Feebauville Drive. Booster pumps may be
required to supply water pressure to the upper
flours which would be the responsibility of 0Puo'
i~ Street lighting, parkway trees and sidewalks will
be required along public right-of-ways to conform
to the Annexation Agreement;
j` Provide buffering to screen loading from Kensington
Road and redesign the area to the North of the
building;
k' Develop additional landscaping acceptable to staff
along the Northern boundary;
I To create "bypass" lanes at reebaoviIle on wolf in
~ accordance with Traffic Engineers report; and,
M. The access on FeebaoviIle Drive be limited to
right-in/right-out only.
SECTION THREE: oitb the exception of the special use
, the Subject Property shall comply with all
other applicable
^^��---Ie nillaqe of umoot Prospect Ordinances and
Regulations pertaining thereto.
Page 3
xoA 8 -So -87
ooCrz0m FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication
in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
PASSED and APPROVED this _5ith�__ day of May ,1987.
AYES: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg
NAYS: Van Geem
ABSENT: None
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
VILLAGE CLERK
'Iry
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPART�MENTT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER %�
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 1992
SUBJECT. CONSORTIUM AGREEMENT WITH COOK COUNTY
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP
Attached please Fmd the following:
A Resolution authorizing a memorandum of understanding for the HOME
Investment Partnership Consortium.
2. A Resolution authorizing a Consortium Agreement with Cook County.
You will recall that at the time the Village Board reviewed our Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy (CHAS), there was discussion about forming a consortium with
neighboring communities to take advantage of HOME funding for affordable housing goals.
Later, it was determined that a consortium with Des Plaines and Arlington Heights would
not provide a sufficient enough population for the HOME funding formula,
Cook County has determined that they could be the lead agency for all C.D.B.G.
entitlement communities in the County. The County, and all members of the consortium
will prioritize and select affordable housing programs, and the County will monitor the
programs.
The two resolutions must be authorized by the Village Board, to participate in the
consortium partnership, and to authorize the consortium agreement.
Staff recommends approval of these two resolutions so the Village can participate in this
program, and have appropriate access to HOME funds that otherwise would not be
available.
DMC:hg
caf/DC
2/12/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE COOK COUNTY
HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP CONSORTIUM
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
have determined that it would be in the best interest of the
Village to cooperate with the County of Cook in entering into a
Memorandum of Understanding for the HOME Investment Partnership
Consortium in an effort to provide an opportunity for affordable
housing for residents of said Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Village Clerk of Village of Mount
Prospect are hereby authorized and directed to execute the
Memorandum of Understanding between the County of Cook and the
Village of Mount Prospect for Federal Fiscal Year 1992, a copy of
said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
4
BOBS Investawnt Partnerships
Consortiun AgreeaWent
THIS AGREEMENT entered into this by and between County
of Cook, a body politic and corporate of the State o -.nota (the 'County') and
theVi1� of ., Mt, Prosgect____, an Illinois municipal corporation (the
'Municipality').
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the United States Congress has enacted the Cranston -Gonzalez National
Affordable Housing Act ('the Act") providing federal financial assistance for the
support of affordable housing as identified in Title II --Investment in Affordable
Housing of HOME Investment Partnerships Act: and
WHEREAS, the Act makes possible the allocation of funds to the County for the
purpose of undertaking affordable housing activities identified in the Act; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Municipality have determined that joint action is the
most effective way -to accomplish the purposes of said Act; and
WHEREAS, units of local government have had conferred upon them the following
powers by Article VII, Section 10(a) of the 1970 Constitution of the State of
Illinois:
'Units of localgovernment ad school districts may contract or otherwise associate among themselves, wish the State, with otherstaus
and their units local of government and school districts, and wilh she United States to obtain or share services and to exercue,
combine or transfer any power or function, in any matter not prohibited bylaw or by ordinance. Units of lad government and
school districts may contract and otherwise associate with individuals, associations, and corporations in any manner not prohibited
by law or by ordinance. participating units of government may use their credit, revenues, and odor resources to pay costs and to
service debt related so intergovernmental activities.'; ad
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, (Illinois Revised Statues,
Chapter 127, Section 741 et seg.) enacted by the State of Illinois provides in
part as follows:
'Section 743. Intergovernmental Agreements. Any power or powers, privileges or authority exercised or which may be exemired
by a public agency of this State may be exercised and enjoyed jointly with any other public agency ofd= State ad jouuty with any
public agency of any other state or of the United States, to the trim that laws of such other state or of the United Stater do not
prohibitjoint exercise or enjoyment.'
'Section 745. Intergovernmental Contracts. Any one or more public agencies may contract with arty one or mon other public
agencies to perform any governmental service, activity or undertaking which any of the public agencies entering into the contract is
authorized by law to perform provided that such contract shat! be authorized by the governing body of each party to the contract.
Such contract shall set forth filly the purposes, powers, rights, objectives and responsibilities of the contracting parties. and
WHEREAS, the parties to this Agreement have had conferred upon them the exercise
of powers authorized in Chapters 24 and 34 of the Illinois Revised Statues (known
as the "Illinois Municipal Code" and the "Counties Code" respectively);
NOW, THEREFORE, upon the consideration of the mutual promises contained herein
and upon the further consideration of the recitals hereinabove set forth, it is
hereby agreed between the County and the Municipality hereto, as follows:
A. That the recitals hereinabove set forth are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth herein.
E. That the Cook County HOME Investment Partnerships Consortium (the
"Consortium') is defined to include as members of the Consortium the
County,
an
any other municipalities which in the future take the appropriate action under
the Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder to join the Consortium.
C. That the Municipality and the County hereby agree to cooperate to undertake
and/or to assist in undertaking housing assistance activities in order to
alleviate housing problems through the HOME investment Partnerships Program
(hereafter referred to as the HOME Program) in cooperation with the Consortium;
and
D. That the Municipality hereby authorizes the County to act in a
representative capacity as the lead entity for the members of the Consortium for
purposes of the HOME Program; and
E. That the Municipality agrees that the County will assume overall
responsibility as the lead entity to ensure that the Consortium's HOME Program
is carried out in compliance with the requirements of the Program, including
requirements concerning a Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS).
It is mutually understood, however, that the County is responsible for
Implementation of the HOME Program and that the Municipality remains fully
responsible for implementation of any other funding from federal, state, or local
programs which may be identified in the CHAS as it pertains to the Municipality's
identified needs and prorities.
F. That the Municipality agrees to evidence its consent to participation in
the Consortium by providing the County with two certified copies of a Resolution
from the governing body of the Municipality that the Chief Executive Officer of
the Municipality is authorized to sign this Consortium Agreement; and
G. That the signature of said Chief Executive Officer will be affixed to this
Agreement evidencing the willingness of the Municipality to participate in the
Consortium, and to cooperate in the implementation of the Cook County Consortium
for HOME.
H. That the County agrees to evidence its consent to participation in the
Consortium by providing the village with two certified copies of a Resolution
from the governing body of the County that the Chief Executive Officer of the
County is authorized to sign this Consortium agreement; and
I. That the signature of said Chief Executive Officer will be affixed to this
Agreement evidencing the willingness of the County to participate in the
Consortium.
Jr. Further, that a copy of this Consortium Agreement signed by the Chief
Executive Officer of the County will be provided to the Village.
K. That the Municipality and County agree to affirmatively further fair
housing; and
L. That the term of this Agreement is for a period of not less than the period
necessary to carry out all activities that will be funded from funds awarded for
the Federal Fiscal Year FY93 (commencing October 1, 1991 ending September, 1993)
and that the signatories to this Agreement are required to remain in the
Consortium through the period ending September 30, 1993.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have caused this Agreement to
be executed by their duly designed Officials.
village of Mt. Prospect , Illinois
BY:
TITLE:
DATE:
ATTEST:
Municipal Clerk
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Municipal Attorney
COUNTY OF COOK, ILLINOIS
FM
TITLE:
f1�
ATTEST:
County Clerk
SEAL:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Assistant State's Attorney
3
caf/DC
2/12/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE HOME INVESTMENT PARNERSHIP CONSORTIUM
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount
Prospect have determined that it would be in the best interest of
the Village to cooperate with the County of Cook in the HOME
Investment Partnerhsip Consortium in an effort to provide an
opportunity for affordable housing for residents of said Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE:. That the Mayor and Village Clerk of Village of Mount
Prospect are hereby authorized and directed to execute the HOME
Investment Parnership consortium Agreement between the County of
Cook and the Village of Mount Prospect for Federal Fiscal Year
1992, a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made
a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO• That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
, 1992.
HOME Investment Partnership Consortium
Memorandum of Understanding
THIS MEMORANDUM entered into this , 1992 by and between
the County of Cook, a body politic and corporate of the State of Illinois (the
"County") and the village of Mt. Prospect an Illinois municipal
corporation (the "Municipality").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County and the Municipality desire to pursue the creation of a HOME
Investment Partnership -Consortium; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Municipality have determined that joint action is
the most effective way to accomplish the affordable housing goals of both
jurisdictions; and
WHEREAS, the purpose of this Memorandum of Understanding is to clarify certain
provisions agreed to between both parties pursuant to the HOME Investment
Partnership Consortium Agreement:
NOW, THEREFORE, the following stipulations of the Memorandum of Agreement are
hereby agreed to by all parties.
1. That the recitals hereinabove set forth are incorporated herein by
reference as if fully set forth herein.
2. Matching Funds. The County as Grantee assumes the lead agency
responsibility for receiving and providing the necessary matching
funds for this HOME Consortium Program. Matching funds shall be
provided for eligible projects by the County through the development
of a revolving loan/trust fund or other mechanism deemed
appropriate. The County also encourages the Municipality to obtain
any non-cash match available on an individual project basis.
Although this is not required, it would add to the viability of any
HOME Investment Partnership Program. These matching fund provisions
shall not be deemed to constitute the Municipality's endorsement of
or concurrence with any anticipated revenue sources envisioned by
the County.
3. Progran Development and Prioritisation of Eligible Projects. The
County and the participating HOME Investment Partnership Consortium
members (including the Municipality) will cooperate in the
development of the overall general HOME Program descriptions,
prioritization criteria, and the individual project selection
process to be administered by the County. The selection process may
entail development of a round table format, creation of a project
selection group, or establishment of a clearing house for review of
such projects. Additionally, through the development of such a
process, the County shall review and consider the Municipality's
comments and concerns relative to a project.
4. Program Monitoring. The County hereby agrees to assume lead agency
responsibility, which includes the monitoring of HOME eligible
programs and projects. The Municipality remains responsible for
monitoring appropriate elements of the Comprehensive Housing
Affordability Strategy (CHAS) and Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) programs along with any other federal or sate grants secured
by the Municipality.
The Municipality hereby agrees to provide the necessary building
code inspections for any HOME funded projects within its corporate
limits to as to assure adherence to all local codes and ordinances.
5. Duration of the Memorandum. This Memorandum shall be in effect for
a period not less than the period necessary to carry out all
activities that will be funded from funds that will be awarded for
the Federal Fiscal Year 1993 (commencing October 1, 1992 and ending
September 30, 1993) as provided in the HOME Investment Partnership
Consortium Agreement.
6. Concurrent Effect of the Consortium Agresmont and the Memorandum.
This Memorandum of Understanding is adopted by the County and the
Municipality concurrently with the adoption of the HOME Partnership
Consortium Agreement. it is the intention of the parties that
neither the Agreement nor the Memorandum shall have any force unless
the other is also in effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned parties have caused this Memorandum to be
executed by their duly designated officials.
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
Seal:
Approved as to form:
By:
Title:
Date:
Attest:
Seal:
Approved as to form:
County of, Cook, Illinois
County Cler
Assistant State's Attorney
Villagg of, Mt. Prospect , Illinois
Clerk
Attorney
Addendum to:
•'"'
ar . w • • - • ar
Each CDBG Entitlement Municipality is required to adopt and submit its own CHAS
lin the format required by HUD) to Cook County, including policies, strategies, and
priorities for inclusion in the County's consolidated CHAS.
Date
(b) Subsequent Phase I Deficiency or any Deficiency after
Majority Service Date
ESW = Expected Financing Member System Waste
FM
EW -- Expected Agency Waste
A
FC - Fixed Costs of Project
A
FC = Fixed Costs payable by Financing Member.
FM
OMC = Operation and Maintenance Costs of Project
A
OMC = Operation and Maintenance Costs payable by
FM Financing Member
SW -- Financing Member System Waste
FM
W- Agency Waste
A
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 16:42 —2—
DF
DC = FM x
DC
FM E DF
A
FM
Key
DC -
Deficiency Charge
to be imposed by Agency
A
DC -
Deficiency Charge
payable by Financing Member
FM
DC =
Deficiency Charge
payable by Financing Member which is
FU
a Future User
DC =
Deficiency Charge
payable by Financing Member which is
IU
an Initial User
DF =
Deficiency Factor
of Financing Member; taken from
FM
Exhibit E
DF =
Deficiency Factor
of Financing Member which is a Future
FU
User; taken from Exhibit E
DF =
Deficiency Factor
of FinancingMember which is an
IU
Initial User; taken from Exhibit E
EUC =
Excessive Use Charge payable by Financing Member
FM
ESW = Expected Financing Member System Waste
FM
EW -- Expected Agency Waste
A
FC - Fixed Costs of Project
A
FC = Fixed Costs payable by Financing Member.
FM
OMC = Operation and Maintenance Costs of Project
A
OMC = Operation and Maintenance Costs payable by
FM Financing Member
SW -- Financing Member System Waste
FM
W- Agency Waste
A
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 16:42 —2—
99
FORKULAS
A. Operation and Maintenance Costs (Section 7.2)
SW
OMC = OMC x FM
FM A W
A
B. Fixed Costs (Section 7.3)
(a) If Agency Waste plus Customer Waste is less than 85% of
Expected Agency Waste:
(greater of SW or .85(ESW))
FC = FC x M FM
FM A .85 (EW )
A
(b) If Agency Waste plus Customer Waste is greater than or
equal to 85% of Expected Agency Waste:
SW
FC = FC x FM
FM A .85(EW )
A
C. Excessive Use Charge (Section 7.4)
OMC + FC
EUC = �M
FM 10
D. Deficiency Charge (Section 7.5)
(a) Phase I Deficiency
DF
DC = IU x DC x (.9)
IU E DF A
IU
DF
DC - FU x DC x (.1)
FU E DF A
FU
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 16:41
DEFICIENCY FACTOR
Municipality
J Based on 2003 Waste Estimates
agreement. Never revised or
be deleted on execution copy]
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41
Factor)
made at time of execution of
updated. [Explanatory note to
ESTIMATED COSTS OF COMPONENTS
OF PROJECT
Wheeling Township Transfer Station
Interim Costs
Balefill
Rolling Meadows Transfer Station
Third Transfer Station
Landscape Waste Facility
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/42 15:41
«�
EXHIBIT C
FINANCING MEMBER WASTE SYSTEM
[Attach ordinance establishing Financing Member Waste System and
any contract or agreement as described in Section 10.10(b)] -
[The actual designation of, or changes in, the area of generation
of non-residential Financing Member System Waste may be made
without Agency consent prior to Financing Member Delivery Date
provided that the volume committed under Exhibit B is not
changed.]
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41
Financing Member
Arlington Heights
Barrington
Buffalo Grove
Des Plaines
Elk Grove Village
Evanston
Glencoe
Glenview
Hoffman Estates
Inverness
Kenilworth
Lincolnwood
Morton Grove
Mount Prospect
Niles
Northbrook
Northfield
Palatine
Park Ridge
Prospect Heights
Rolling Meadows
Skokie
South Barrington
Wheeling
Wilmette
Winnetka
EXHIBIT B
FINANCING ME ER DELIVERY DATE AND
EXPECTED FINANCING MEMBER SYSTEM WASTE
Expected Expected Financing Transfer
Delivery Member System Waste Station
Date for First Year Designation
J Indicate if less than 100% of Expected Financing Member
System Waste will be delivered [3 year limit to phase in].
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41
EXHIBIT A
INITIAL USERS
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41
wIjNESS WHgREOF the Agency and the Financing Member have
caused this Agreement to be executed in their respective
corporate names and attested by their duly authorized officers
and sealed with their corporate seals, all as of the date first
above written.
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
COOK COUNTY
Chairman
[SEAL]
Attest:
Secretary
Date of Execution by Financing Member: , 1992.
[Village/City of ]
Its
[SEAL]
Attest:
Its
3047511 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:59
and if to the Financing Member at:
,, Attention:
or such other address as either the Agency or the Financing
Member shall designate by notice to the other. Notice shall be
considered given when delivered or 3 days after being deposited
in the mail.
13.9. Amendment. This Agreement may be amended only by
written agreement between the Agency and the Financing Member.
If the Agency pledges or assigns any of its rights under this
Agreement to the Trustee in connection with the sale, issuance
and payment of Agency obligations, then this Agreement shall not
be terminated, revoked, amended or modified except as provided in
and permitted by the Master Bond Resolution so long as the Master
Bond Resolution is in effect.
13.10. SevgX:abiLjtX. Should any part, term or provision of
this Agreement be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction
to be illegal or in conflict with any law, the validity of the
remaining portions or provisions shall not be affected thereby.
13.11. Waiver. No action by either party to this Agreement
other than a written statement signed by the party against whom a
waiver is claimed, shall be deemed a waiver of any rights granted
by this Agreement. A waiver of rights with respect to any matter
arising under this Agreement shall not be deemed a waiver of any
other rights under this Agreement, nor a waiver of similar or
identical rights with respect to afiy other matter.
13.12. Govgrnincr La This Agreement shall be construed
under the applicable laws of the State of Illinois.
13.13. Local Government Financigl Rlannipg and gjupgryigign
Act. Pursuant to Section 14 of the Local Government Financial
Planning and Supervision Act (Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 85, 1 7214
(1989)), the parties hereby declare that the provisions of such
act do not apply to any indebtedness, obligation or liability
incurred under this Agreement.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —31—
it will, upon notice of assignment to the Trustee, make all
payments directly to the Trustee. The rights of the Agency to
enforce the provisions of this Agreement may be assigned to the
Trustee and, in such event, the Trustee will have the right to
enforce this Agreement at law or in equity with or without the
further consent or participation of the Agency. The Agency may
also retain the right to enforce this Agreement.
13.7. Cooppratigj2. The Financing Member shall cooperate
with the Agency in the issuance of Agency Obligations, and the
Agency shall cooperate with the Financing Member in the issuance
of the Financing Member's general obligation bonds or revenue
bonds of its Financing Member Waste System. In such connection,
the Financing Member and the Agency will comply with all
reasonable requests of each other and will, upon request, do as
follows:
(a) Make available 'general and financial information about
itself;
(b) Consent to publication and distribution of its
financial information;
(c) Certify that general and financial information about it
is accurate, does not contain an untrue statement of a material
fact and does not omit to state a material fact necessary in
order to make the statements in that information, in light of the
circumstances under which they were made, not misleading;
(d) Make available certified copies of official
proceedings;
(e) Provide reasonable certifications to be used in a
transcript of closing documents; and
(f) Provide for reasonably requested opinions of counsel as
to the validity of its actions taken with respect to and the
binding effect of this Agreement, title to .its Financing Member
Waste System, as applicable, pending or threatened litigation
which could materially affect its performance hereunder, and
other reasonably related opinions.
13.8. Xgtigeq. All notices, invoices and bills under this
Agreement shall be in writing except in case of emergency and
shall be delivered either in person or by first class mail, if to
the Agency at:
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County
1616 East Golf Road
Des Plaines, Illinois 60016
Attention: Executive Director
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —30-
may affect directly or indirectly the ability of the Financing
Member to perform its obligations under this Agreement.
(d) The Financing Member shall keep on file with the Agency
the name(s) of the person(s) in charge of the operation of the
Financing Member Waste System.
(e) The Financing Member shall make available to the Agency
in timely manner all Financing Member information related to
performance of this Agreement, including, without limitation,
audits, capital improvements and prospective expansions of the
Financing Member Waste System.
(f) The Financing Member shall provide the Agency with a
copy of any Financing Member financial or management audit w.thin
30 days of its acceptance by the Financing Member.
13.5. Aggngy ggpgLft-s. (a) The Agency shall provide the
Financing Member with a copy of the Project Budget within 30 days
after its adoption.
(b) The Agency shall provide the Financing Member within 10
days after the end of each month with a monthly report of the
Financing Member System Waste for all Financing Members.
(c) The Agency shall immediately notify the Financing
Member of any emergency failure or malfunction of the Project or
of any other condition or event which affects or may affect
directly or indirectly the Agency's performance of its
obligations under this'Agreement.
(d)' The Agency shall keep the Financing Member informed of
the name(s) of the person(s) in charge of the Project.
(e) Upon written request, the Agency shall provide access
to the Financing Member all records of the Agency regarding the
Project.
(f) The Agency shall provide the Financing Member with a
copy of any Agency financial or management audit within 30 days
of its acceptance by the Agency.
13.6. Assiq=gnt. Except to the extent hereinafter
provided, neither party shall assign or transfer this Agreement
or any rights or interests herein without the written consent of
the other. The right to receive all payments which are required
to be made by the Financing Member to the Agency in accordance
with the provisions of this Agreement may be assigned by the
Agency to the Trustee as provided in the Master Bond Resolution
to secure the payment of principal of and premium, if any, and
interest on the Agency Obligations as those amounts come due,
subject to the application of those payments as may be provided
in the Master Bond Resolution. The Financing Member agrees that
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —29—
(except for the obligation described under Section 3.4) by any
event or condition beyond its reasonable control, including, but
not limited to, strikes or other work stoppages, war, acts of
civil or military authorities other than the Financing Member,
earthquakes or tornadoes. If any such event occurs, the
Financing Member shall remain obligated hereunder as described
under Section 3.4.
ARTICLE %III
,MISCELLANEOUS
13.1. gistribution of Rgpgrts. Copies of all reports and
studies required by this Agreement shall be provided to the
Agency, the Trustee and each of the Financing Members.
13.2. Ig This Agreement shall have a term commencing on
the effective date and ending on the earlier to occur of (i)
December 31, 2031 or (ii) one year after the date on which 60% of
the Directors of the Hoard then holding office vote to terminate
this Agreement, provided that termination pursuant to this clause
shall not become effective until Agency Obligations are no longer
outstanding for at least one year.
13.3. This Agreement shall become
effective only when Agreements have been executed by the Agency
and a number of members of the Agency having a population in
excess of 584,180 and this Agreement shall not become effective
if that has not occurred on or before December 31, 1992.
13.4. Einancipg Mgmber, Mpgrts- (a) The Financing Member
shall provide the Agency with a copy of the Financing Member
budget prepared in accordance with Section 10.8 within 30 days
after that budget is adopted. The Agency will provide the
Financing Member an annual reminder notice to assist the
Financing Member in complying with this subsection. The budget
as so provided shall include a description and an estimate of any
revenues other than revenue from rates and charges for the
Financing Member Waste System which are to be used to make
payments under this Agreement as provided in Section 8.11.
(b) The Financing Member shall keep on file with the Agency
a copy of the Financing Member's effective rates for the
Financing Member Waste System, including any formula by which
less than 100% of the rates are billed for collection.
(c) The Financing Member shall immediately notify the
Agency of any emergency, disruption or failure of the Financing
Member Waste System or other event, or condition which affects or
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —2 8—
12.4. Acrej3gy Defaults. Failure by the Agency to perform
any obligation under this Agreement and the continuation of that
failure to perform for 30 days after written notice from the
Financing Member to the Agency of such failure shall be a default
of the Agency under this Agreement, unless any such failure is
excused pursuant to Section 12.6.
12.5. Financing Mexiabgr gmedirga in gment
(a) In the event of a default by the Agency under this Agreement,
the Financing Member may bring any action against the Agency,
including an action in equity and actions for mandamus and
specific performance of the Agency's obligations to the extent
allowed by law, but in any event, whether or not there is an
Agency default, as long as Agency Obligations are outstanding,
the Financing Member shall have no right to cancel or rescind
this Agreement, no right to withhold payments due or to become
due under this Agreement, no right to setoff or counterclaim, and
no right to recover amounts pledged and assigned as security for
the payment of Agency obligations under this Agreement and the
Master Bond Resolution.
(b) Failure on the part of the Agency or of any Financing
Member in any instance or under any circumstance to observe or
fully perform any obligation assumed by or imposed upon it by
this Agreement shall not relieve the Financing Member from making
any payment to the Agency or fully performing any other
obligation required of it under this Agreement, but the Financing
Member may have and pursue any and all other remedies provided by
law (1) compelling performance by the Agency of any obligation
assumed by or imposed upon the Agency by this Agreement or (2)
compelling performance of any payment obligation imposed upon any
Financing Member pursuant to its Agreement.
(c) Election of any remedy shall not be a waiver of any
other remedy. The Agency will issue Agency obligations in
specific reliance on the limitations set forth in this Section
with respect to the rights of the Financing Member.
12.6. Forge M4j2]arp. (a) The Agency shall not be in
default under this Agreement to the extent that it is prevented
from or delayed in performance of its obligations under this
Agreement by any event or condition beyond its reasonable
control, including, but not limited to, strikes or other work
stoppages, war, acts of civil or military authorities other than
the Agency, earthquakes, tornadoes, inability of the Agency to
borrow money to finance acquisition and construction of the
Project and acts of the Financing Member. If any such.event
occurs, the Financing Member shall remain obligated hereunder as
described under Section 3.4.
(b) The Financing Member shall not be in default under
Section 12.1(c) or (d) to the extent it is prevented from or
delayed in performance of its obligations under this Agreement
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —27—
12.1.The following events or
conditions shall be considered defaults of the Financing Member
under this Agreement.
(a) Failure to pay when due any amounts payable under this
Agreement;
(b) Failure to pay when due any other amounts payable to
the Agency, including, but not limited to any charge imposed
pursuant to the Agency Agreement;
(c) Failure to deliver its Financing Member System Waste
required to be delivered pursuant to Section 3.3; and
(d) Failure to perform any other obligation under this
Agreement and the continuation of that failure for 30 days after
written notice from the Agency or the Trustee of such failure.
12.2.
In addition to any other remedy which may be available to the
Agency at law or in equity or under this Agreement or the Agency
Agreement, including any right to refuse to accept delivery of
Financing Member System Waste, the Agency shall have the
following remedies in the event of default by the Financing
Member:
(a) In the event of a default described in Section 12.1(a)
the Agency (and the Trustee) shall have the right to compel the
payment of any Deposit as described in Section 8.11 and to
collect the late charge and interest provided in Sections 8.3 and
8.4.
(b) In the event of a default described in Section 12.1(b),
(.c) or (d), the Agency shall have the rights to mandamus and
specific performance of the Financing Member's obligations to the
extent allowed by law. Election of any remedy shall not be a
waiver of any other remedy.
12.3.
Accrue. In the event that the Financing Member is in default
under Section 12.1(a), the obligation of the Financing Member to
make payments under this Agreement shall continue to accrue,
notwithstanding the fact that other Financing Members may have
been billed for or may have paid shares of Deficiency Charges as
a result of the default by the Financing Member. Payment of any
amounts by the Financing Member while in default shall be applied
first to the payment of late charges, interest and overdue
amounts (in that order) until those amounts are paid in full.
The obligation to make payments of amounts in default, including
late charges and interest, shall survive beyond the term of this
Agreement until those amounts are paid.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —26—
(e) require all haulers of Financing Member System Waste to
observe rules and regulations pertaining to operation of the
Project as promulgated by the Agency, in accordance with Section
10.2;
(f) provide for the imposition of service charges, fees and
rates upon the persons who are customers of the Financing Member
Waste System, in accordance with Section 10.3;
(g) pledge the revenues and funds of such Financing Member
Waste System to secure the obligations of the Financing Member
under the Agreement;
(h) provide for appropriate sanctions to be applied to any
persons who fail to comply with the provisions of the ordinance;
(i) require all persons generating Financing Member System
Waste to arrange for disposal of such Waste through the Financing
Member or a hauler authorized by the Financing Member; and
(j) prohibit the transportation or disposal of Financing
Member System Waste by anyone other than the Financing Member or
a hauler authorized by the Financing Member.
10.12. R W s e .
From and after the Financing Member's Delivery Date through the
term of this Agreement, the Financing Member shall deliver or
cause to be delivered its Financing Member Systems Waste to the
Agency and the Financing Member and, without the written consent
of the Agency, the Financing Member shall not create, nor permit
the operation of, a waste system which competes with its
Financing Member Waste System.
ARTICLE %I
RECYCLING INCENTIVE
11.1. Re e. The Agency will adopt rules and
regulations providing for, among other things, incentives to
maintain or increase the amount of recycling undertaken by the
Financing Member.
ARTICLE %II
DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES
This Article sets forth the rights of the Agency in the
event that the Financing Member fails to perform its obligations
under this Agreement and the rights of the Financing Member in
the event that the Agency fails to perform its obligations under
this Agreement.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —25—
counsel nationally recognized as having expertise in the area of
tax-exempt bonds and acceptable to the Agency to the effect that
failure to comply with such covenant will not adversely affect.
the exclusion from gross income of interest on Agency
Obligations.
Financing Member,determined it such Member's to ♦ Mi. so, covenants
will keep in full force and effect during the term of
Agreement an ordinance a4y. hereto as Exhibit
minimum, complies• yy.. through below an"..
if
it has any agreements lb as Exhibit C or ari
any
such agreements duringthe term of Agreement, Ml
venants
that it has or Ml
appropriaterotherpartyto
any such agreement Mlcomplywith subsections
below. Any such ordinance or agreement shall**
(a) establish a Financing Member Waste System pursuant to
the Act and Chapter 24, paragraphs 11-19-1 through 11-19-10 of
the Illinois Revised Statutes, as amended, for the collection,
transportation and disposal of the Financing Member System Waste;
(b) provide that such Financing Member Waste System is (or
will be at any particular time during the existence of this
Agreement) either () a waste disposal franchise system or
licensing system under which company or companies collect,
transport and dispose of the Financing Member ;system Waste, or
(ii) a municipally owned and municipally or privately operated
waste disposal system under which either the Financing Member or
a private contractor or contractors collect, transport and
dispose of the Financing Member System Waste, or (iii) a
combination of (i) and (ii)#*
(c) require all Financing Member System Waste to be
disposed of at a Transfer Station or at such other locations, at
such times and in such amounts as are designated by the Agency,
which method shall be the exclusive method of collection and
disposal of all of the Financing Member System Waste, all as
contemplated by this Agreement;
(d) prohibit the delivery by or on behalf of the Financing
Member of all but Financing Member System Waste to a Transfer
Station unless otherwise agreed to by the Agency;
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —24—
similar arrangement. As of the date hereof, there are no written
contracts or agreements between the Financing Member and any
person relating to the Financing Member Waste System, except
those listed on Exhibit C hereto. As of the date hereof, there
are no oral agreements or understandings between the Financing
Member and any person relating to the Financing Member Waste
System;
(c) With respect to contracts, agreements, or
understandings the Financing Member may enter into on and after
the date hereof for the collection and transportation of
Financing Member System Waste, title to the Financing Member
System Waste shall at all times remain with the Financing Member
until accepted by the Agency. All contracts, agreements or
understandings that the Financing Member may enter into with
haulers shall.state that the obligations of such haulers shall
relate only to the collection and transportation of Financing
Member System Waste. Under any contracts, agreements or
understandings that the Financing Member may enter into, no
hauler shall be responsible for the disposition of any Financing
Member System Waste, except at the explicit direction of the
Financing Member;
(d) No portion of the payments to be made to the Agency by
the Financing Member pursuant to Article VII herein or any credit
enhancement or liquidity device relating to the foregoing is or
will be directly or indirectly guaranteed (in whole or in part)
by the United States (or any agency or instrumentality thereof);
(e) To the extent not prohibited by state law or pre-
existing contracts or other obligations, the Financing Member
will take all actions with respect to either (i) the use of the
Financing Member Waste System or (ii) the investment of moneys or
other property derived from the operation of the Financing Member
Waste System that may be necessary to establish and maintain the
tax-exempt status of the Agency Obligations throughout the term
of the Agency Obligations, including compliance with any
applicable law or regulation that may be enacted or promulgated
in the future. The Agency may from time to time deliver to the
Financing Member letters of counsel nationally recognized as
having expertise in the area of tax-exempt bonds advising the
Financing Member of actions or inactions with respect to either
(i) the use of the Financing Member Waste System or (ii) the
investment of moneys or other property derived from the operation
of the Financing Member Waste System that may be necessary to
maintain or establish the tax-exempt status of interest payable
on Agency Obligations. Such advice may include advice to execute
supplemental agreements setting forth additional or alternate
covenants of the Financing Member; and
(f) The Financing Member need not comply with any covenant
contained in this Section 10.10, if the Financing Member obtains
an opinion addressed to the Agency and to the Financing Member of
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —23—
(ii) such funds may be commingled with other funds of the
Financing Member for investment purposes.
10.6. PayMents from i a c" WAgltpa System. The
payments required to be made by the Financing Member under this
Agreement shall be considered a portion of the operation and
maintenance costs of the Financing Member Waste System.
10.7. Bgghg an!ft Accognts. The Financing Member will make
and keep separate and proper books and accounts with respect to
the Financing Member Waste System and cause those books and
accounts to be audited annually in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles.
10.8. Bggggt dggtjgn. The Financing Member will adopt a
budget or appropriation ordinance for each fiscal year in
accordance with all applicable law and provide for the payment of
all sums anticipated to be due to the Agency during the fiscal
year.
• -Any
w.- ,. .. .. •
resolutionMember
the issuance after the date of this Agreement of any obligation
of -m.- be paid from revenues of
Member Waste System will expressly provide
exceedFinancing Member Waste System may be used to pay principal of and
premium, if any, and interest on those obligations only to the
extent that those revenues the amounts required to pay the
operation and maintenance expenses of its Financing Member Waste
System including, expressly, all amounts payable from time to
time under Agreement.
10.10. Tax Matters. So long as any of Agency Obligations
are outstanding:
(a) Not more than ten percent (10) of the payments to be
made to the Agency by the Financing Member pursuant to the
Project Agreement has been or will be, directly or indirectly (i)
secured by any interest in (A) property used or to be used in any
activity carried on by any person other than a state or local
governmental unit or (B) payments in respect of such property, or
(ii) derived from payments (whether or not by the Financing
Member or to the Agency), in respect of property, or borrowed
money, used or to be used in any activity carried on by any
person other than a state or local governmental unit;
(b) No one uses or will be permitted to use more than ten
percent (10%) of the Financing Member Waste System on any basis
other than the same basis as the general public** and no person
other than a state or local governmental unit uses or will be
permitted to use the Financing Member Waste System as a result of
(i) ownership, (ii) actual or beneficial use pursuant to a lease
or a management or incentive payment contract, or (:iii.) any other
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —22—
ARTICLE %
FINANCING MEMBER COVENANTS
The Financing Member covenants and agrees as follows:
10.1. Finanging Mgahgr W e . The Financing Member
shall and shall cause each franchisee, licensee and contractor
with respect to the Financing Member Waste System to (a) maintain
and keep the Financing Member Waste System in good repair and
working order; (b) operate it efficiently and -faithfully; and (c)
conform with all laws, including the Act and the rules and
regulations of the Agency as amended from time to time, this
Agreement, any agreement attached as Exhibit C to this Agreement
and its ordinance establishing the Financing Member Waste System.
10.2. Rql2g a e tions !2f Financing MeMhgr,Waste.
System. The Financing Member will establish rules and
regulations for the use, operation and composition of the
Financing Member Waste System which are consistent with those
rules and regulations adopted by the Agency of which the
Financing Member has been given notice and which will enable the
Financing Member to comply with the Agency's rules and
regulations. All such rules and regulations adopted by the
Financing Member shall be filed with the Agency.
10.3. EnforceMgnt of BUlas and Rpqglatigng. The Financing
Member shall vigorously enforce the rules and regulations of its
Financing Member Waste System and its Financing Member Waste
System ordinance and any agreements attached hereto as Exhibit C
and shall diligently pursue the collection of rates and charges
from its customers.
10.4. Financial Covenant. Subject to the provisions of
Sections 8.11, the Financing Member will establish, maintain,
revise as necessary, and collect rates and charges from customers
of the Financing Member Waste System as shall be required from
time to time, together with other available funds, to produce
revenues at least sufficient (a) to pay all amounts due under
this Agreement; (b) to pay all other costs of operation and
maintenance of the Financing Member Waste System; and (c) to
provide adequate depreciation and reserve funds for the Financing
Member Waste System, (d) to conform with the terms of all the
resolutions or ordinances authorizing issuance of bonds payable
from the revenues of the Financing Member Waste System.
10.5. The Financing Member will
provide for segregation of all revenues, accounts and cash
investments of the Financing Member Waste System, provided,
however, that (i) payments made pursuant to Section 8.11 need not
be so segregated, but rather only be accounted for separately and
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —21—
ARTICLE IB
AGENCY COVENANTS
9.1. Covenants Re ard'Dg the R o" ct. The Agency
covenants and agrees that it will:
(a) operate and maintain the Project and each Construction
Component in conformance with all laws and this Agreement;
(b) make and keep separate and proper books and accounts -
with respect to the Project and cause those books and accounts to
be audited annually in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles;
(c) operate and maintain the Project and each Construction
Component in order to be able to perform the obligation to accept
Financing Member System Waste from the Financing Member and other
Financing Members;
(d) maintain in effect and enforce the Agreement with each
of the Financing Members as required by the Master Bond
Resolution;
(e) perform all of its covenants under the Master Bond
Resolution and any Supplemental Bond Resolution, as may be
amended from time to time;
(f) issue Agency Obligations, the debt service on which
will not be includable in Fixed Costs until after December 1995;
provided, however, that Agency Obligations may be issued which
require debt service payments prior to January 1996 if the Agency
receives (i) an opinion of bond counsel that tax exemption on
Agency Obligations would otherwise be jeopardized or (ii) a
letter from, an Independent Financial Consultant that market
conditions dictate that interest rates on Agency Obligations
would otherwise be materially higher;
(g) impose an equity charge under the interim project use
agreements relating to the Prior Notes only -if the Agency pays
that charge for each Financing Member from the Agency's own
funds;
(h) prior to the Majority Service Date and to the extent
permitted under the Master Bond Resolution, use any monies in the
Residual Fund (as defined and created under the Master Bond
Resolution) to reduce the Operation and Maintenance Costs and the
Fixed Costs; and
(i) enter into a contract or agreement to accept Customer
Waste only if the performance of the Agency obligations
thereunder do not impair the Agency's ability to perform its
obligations under the Agreements.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —2 0—
monthly bills after the actual obligations are determined for any
difference between the billed amount and amount actually due to
the Agency pursuant to Article VII. As long as Agency
Obligations are outstanding, the Agency shall make no cash
refunds to any Financing Member. Furthermore, in the event that
any portion of the Fixed Costs paid by a Financing Member prior
'to January 1, 1996 is attributable to debt service on Agency
Obligations, such Financing Member shall receive a credit for
that portion of the Fixed Costs attributable to debt service.
The credit shall be applied against the Financing Member's
obligations to the Agency for the Fiscal Year commencing May 1,
1996. Any such credit shall be added to the Fixed Costs of the
Agency for the Fiscal Year commencing May 1, 1996.
8.13. pjg2gtga. (a) If a Financing Member desires to
dispute all or any part of any payments under this Agreement, the
Financing Member shall nevertheless pay the full amount of any
such payment when due and include with such payment written
notification to the Agency that charges are disputed, the grounds
for dispute and the amount in dispute.. Upon receipt of
notification of dispute, representatives of the Agency shall meet
with representatives of the Financing Member to resolve such
dispute. No adjustment or relief on account of any disputed
charges shall be made unless disputed charges are the subject of
such notice within the time herein specified, or within a
reasonable period from the time the Financing Member knew or
should have known of the facts giving rise to the dispute. The
Agency and the Financing Member shall promptly attempt and
continue efforts to resolve the dispute. In the event that it is
determined that the Financing Member shall have overpaid, it
shall receive a credit pursuant to Section 8.12 and in no event
shall it.be entitled to setoff or counterclaim.
(b) In no event shall the Financing Member's payment or
partial payment of a bill be deemed a waiver with respect to any
claims of the Financing Member. Nor shall the Financing Member's
participation in the dispute resolution process pursuant to this
Section limit the claims, causes of actions, rights, or remedies
that the Financing Member may have at law or in equity against
the Agency under this Agreement or the Agency Agreement, nor
shall such participation be deemed an election of remedies by the
Financing Member.
8.14. dg:+. All revenues derived by the Financing Member
from the operation of its Financing Member Waste System are
hereby pledged to the purpose of making all payments required
under this Agreement and the Agency is hereby granted a lien on
all funds now or hereafter deposited in the Financing Member
Waste System enterprise fund.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —19—
Financing member shall provide a copy of the relevant resolution
or ordinance making such election and a certificate stating to
the reasonable satisfaction of the Agency that (A) the conditions
of this Section 8.11 are expected to be satisfied and (B) the
source of the moneys, the projected monthly cash flow and the
timing of the receipt thereof are expected to satisfy its
obligations hereunder.
(b) If pursuant to subparagraph (a) above a Financing
Member determines to use funds other than those generated from
the operation of its Financing Member Waste System, the Financing
Member shall (i) deposit in the Financing Member Waste -System's
enterprise fund an amount of cash equal to its obligation to the
Agency as estimated by the Project Budget for the next Fiscal
Year or (ii) pledge and assign taxes previously and lawfully
levied but yet to be collected to the Financing Member Waste
System's enterprise fund in an amount equal to its obligation to
the Agency as estimated by the Project Budget for the next Fiscal
Year$ such levy amount to be identified as being for payment to
the Agency in the Financing Member's tax levy ordinance,
appropriation ordinance or budget ordinance. The Financing
Member may also determine to pay its obligations from any
combination of (x) funds generated from the operation of ;its
Financing Member Waste System, (y) any Deposit made pursuant to
clause (i) of the previous sentence and (z) a pledge and
assignment of taxes made pursuant to clause (ii) of the previous
sentence. If the Project Budget for the next Fiscal Year is not
available, the Financing Member may use the Project Budget for
the current Fiscal Year to calculate such amounts. Such amount
shall be properly budgeted and appropriated by the Financing
Member from the Financing Member Waste System's enterprise fund
to the Agency to pay the Financing Member's payment obligations
hereunder.
8.12. Budgets and BillgjjgAlthough it is
intended that the Project Budget will be an accurate estimate of,
and the annual bills will accurately state, the payment
obligations of the Financing Member, the payment obligations of
the Financing Member are determined by Article VII of this
Agreement. Failure by the Agency to adopt a. Project Budget or to
send any bill, or inaccuracies in a Project Budget or any bill,
shall not affect the obligations of the Financing Member to pay
all amounts due pursuant to Article VII. The Agency shall
calculate the actual obligations of each Financing Member for the
previous Fiscal Year within 60 days after the beginning of a
subsequent Fiscal Year. If the amount due under Article VII
exceeds the billed amount, the Financing Member shall -pay -to the
Agency over the four monthly payments after the actual
obligations are determined all amounts due in respect of any
difference between billed amounts and amounts actually due to the
Agency pursuant to Article VII. If the billed amount exceeds the
amount due under Article VII, the Agency shall give a credit to
the Financing Member in the subsequent Fiscal Year over the four
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —18—
8.7. Nature b . The obligation of the Financing
Member to make all payments as required by this Agreement is
unconditional and irrevocable, without setoff or counterclaim and
irrespective of whether the Project or any Component is ever
completed, made available or provided to the Financing Member or
whether any Financing Member fails to deliver Financing Member
System Waste, and notwithstanding any suspension, interruption,
interference, reduction or curtailment of the Project or any
Component.
8.8. Paymentg froa Revenugs of Finanging M!Rmber WaSt
System. Except as provided in Sections 8.9 and 8.11 of this
Agreement, all payments required to be made by the Financing
Member under this Agreement shall be made from revenues to be
derived by the Financing Member from the operation of its
Financing Member Waste System. Payments made by the Financing
Member under this Agreement shall not constitute an indebtedness
of the Financing Member within the meaning of any statutory or
constitutional limitation. Notwithstanding the provisions of
this Section, the Financing Member is not prohibited by this
Agreement from using any other available funds to make the
payments required by this Agreement, provided however, that the
use of any such other funds shall be made only pursuant to
Sections 8.9 or 8.11.
8.9. gericiency oarge Payment or 11gme-gRLe.a im_ as
Genergl-Lptligatign. If the Financing Member is a home -rule unit
pursuant to Article VII of the 1970 Constitution of the State of
Illinois on the effective date of this Agreement, any Deficiency
Charge payable by the Financing Member under this Agreement is a
general obligation of the Financing Member to the prompt payment
of which its full faith and credit and its taxing power are
pledged, and unless paid from other sources, the Financing Member
shall provide for the levy of a tax on all taxable property
within the corporate limits of the Financing Member without limit
as to rate or amount so as to provide for the payment of such
obligation when due.
8.10. Raymet 02eration.anda t e c u .
The obligation of the Financing Member to make payments required
by this Agreement from revenues of its Financing Member Waste
System shall be payable from the operation and maintenance
account of its Financing Member Waste System enterprise fund and
from all other accounts of its Financing Member Waste System fund
in which there are available funds. Except as provided in
Section 10.9, no other obligation for payment may be made against
the Financing Member Waste System.
8.11. P o -Was e S v (a) Prior
to the beginning of the Agency's Fiscal Year, the Financing
Member may choose to make payments pursuant to this Section 8.11
provided the terms of this Section 8.11 are complied with. Upon
any such election, the chief administrative officer of the
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —17—
customer contracts, the other revenue of the Agency to be applied
to the Project during the Fiscal Year and the amounts needed to
be paid by Financing Members to meet the expenses of the Agency
for the Project in such Fiscal Year. The Project Budget shall
also show an expected allocation of the amounts needed, to be paid
by Financing Members to meet the expenses among the Financing
Members on the basis of the Expected Financing Member system
Waste to be generated during the Fiscal Year. The Agency may
amend the Project Budget at any time, provided that the Financing
Member shall receive 30 days' prior notice of the meeting at
which such amendment is to be adopted.
8.2. Bills. The Agency shall prepare and deliver to the
Financing Member not later than March 15 a statement which shall
set forth the estimated amount of the Financing Member's
obligations under this Agreement for the subsequent Fiscal Year.
The Agency shall also prepare and deliver to the Financing Member
not later than the 5th day of each month a bill for the
subsequent month, the amount of which shall be 1/12th of the
Financing Member's obligations under this Agreement as determined
in the Project Budget for the Fiscal Year and the full amount of
any Deficiency charge and any charges imposed pursuant to
Sections 8.3 and 8.4 not determined in the Project Budget.
Revised bills reflecting amendments to the Project Budget shall
be sent to the Financing Member within 10 days of the adoption of
such amendment.
8.3, lime of g513Mept,1 Lgr& ChAneS. The bill for each
month shall be paid by the Financing Member no later than the
25th day of such month. A Financing Member shall pay a late
charge of 3% on all amounts due and unpaid on the due date.
8.4. In the event that the
Financing Member has not, paid all amounts due including any late
charges by the end of the month in which they are due, the
Financing Member agrees to pay interest on all such unpaid
amounts at the rate of 1 per month or portion of a month, which
interest shall accrue beginning with the first day of the
calendar month after the due date.
8.5. Reggrygtion of ReNe!fties- In addition to the right to
receive a late charge and interest as provided in this Article,
the Agency reserves all other rights and remedies it may have at
law, in equity or under this Agreement or the Agency Agreement as
a result of any failure by the Financing Member to pay when due
all amounts payable under this Agreement. Election of any remedy
shall not be a waiver of any other remedy.
8.6, t a Acceptance of any partial payment
shall not be deemed a waiver with respect to any amounts not
paid.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —16—
Financing Member then in default under Section 12.1(a) of its
Agreement.
(d) The Agency may, but is not required to, impose a
Deficiency Charge if it reasonably expects the related Deficiency
to be eliminated within the subsequent month of the Agency's
Fiscal Year.
(e) The total amount which the Initial User, Future
Financing Member is obligated to pay under this Sect_on 7.5 for
any Fiscal Year shall not exceed one-third of the amounts the
Financing Member is obligated to pay under Sections 7.2 and 7.3
for such Fiscal Year.
7.6. Obligatigng upgn Witladrawsil. The Financing Member may
withdraw from the Agency as provided in Section 6 of the Agency
Agreement but shall remain fully obligated under this Agreement,,
including, but not limited to, all payment obligations, all
obligations to deliver waste and all other performance
obligations and covenants hereunder. If the Financing Member
withdraws, it shall also be obligated to pay all Agency costs
associated with the withdrawal.
ARTICLE VIII
PAYMENT MECHANISM
This Article provides for the Agency to adopt a Project
Budget which will estimate the costs of the Agency for the
Project for each Fiscal Year and estimate the allocation of the
shares of those costs for each Financing Member in that Fiscal
Year. These estimated shares of certain costs will be the basis
of the annual bill, payable in equal monthly installments. The
Project Budget and the annual bill are designed for the
convenience of the Financing Member in making its financial
plans. The payment obligations of the Financing Member are
estimated by the Project Budget. Should the amounts due as
determined under Article VII be greater for any Fiscal Year than
the amount of the annual bill for the Fiscal Year, the amount due
shall be the amount determined under Article VII. Should the
amounts due as determined under Article VII be less for any
Fiscal Year than the amount of the bill, the Financing Member
shall pay during that Fiscal Year not less than the amount of the
bill for that Fiscal Year, but shall be due a credit pursuant to
Section 8.12.
8.1..The Project Budget adopted each
Fiscal Year by a majority of the Directors of the Board then
holding office shall contain a statement of the estimated
expenses, including the Operation and Maintenance Costs and Fixed
Costs for that Fiscal,Year, the estimated other available revenue
of.the Agency from the Project, including estimated income from
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —15—
(i) whose numerator is the greater of (A) the Financing Member
System Waste accepted for the relevant Fiscal Year or (B) 85% of
the Expected Financing Member Waste for the relevant Fiscal Year
and (ii) whose denominator is 85% of the Expected Agency Waste
for the relevant Fiscal Year.
(b) As its share of Fixed Costs of the Project for any
Fiscal Year during which the sum of Agency Waste and Customer
Waste is greater than or equal to 85% of Expected Agency Waste,
the Financing Member shall pay an amount equal to the total Fixed
Costs for the relevant Fiscal,Year multiplied by a fraction whose
numerator is the Financing Member System Waste accepted for the
relevant Fiscal Year and whose denominator is 85% of the Expected
Agency Waste for the relevant Fiscal Year.
7,4,Bygesv In any year in which Financing
Member Waste is disposed of at the Balefill, an Excessive Use
Charge will be assessed against the Financing Member if (a) the
amount of Financing Member System Waste during any Fiscal Year
exceeds 115% of its Expected Financing Member System Waste for
that Fiscal Year and (b) the amount of Agency Waste exceeds 100%
of Expected Agency Waste for that Fiscal Year. The Excessive Use
Charge shall be an amount equal to (i) the sum of such Financing
Member's share of Operation and Maintenance Costs and Fixed Costs
for the Fiscal Year (ii) divided by ten (10). An Excessive Use
Charge will not be imposed or applicable to the Financing Member
until the fourth Fiscal Year after the Financing Member Delivery
Date.
7,5,.(a) An Initial User's share of
the Deficiency Charge from aPhase I Deficiency, if any, for each
period shall be an amount equal to the Initial User's Deficiency
Factor as shown in Exhibit E divided by the sum of the Deficiency
Factors for all Initial Users multiplied by the Deficiency Charge
for the period and multiplied by nine-tenths (9/10). A Future
User's share of the Deficiency Charge from a Phase I Deficiency,,
if any, for each period shall be an amount equal to the Future
User's Deficiency Factor as shown in Exhibit E divided by the sum
of the Deficiency Factors for all Future Users multiplied by the
Deficiency Charge for the period and multiplied by one-tenth
(1/10) .
(b) The Financing Member's share of Deficiency Charges from
.a Subsequent Phase I Deficiency or any Deficiency subsequent to
the Majority Service Date, if any, for each period shall be an
amount equal to the Financing Member's Deficiency Factor as shown
in Exhibit E divided by the sum of the Deficiency Factors for all
Financing Members multiplied by the Deficiency Charge for the
period.
(c) In calculating the sum of the Deficiency Factors as
described above in (a) and (b) of this Section, the Agency may
exclude from any such summation the Deficiency Factor of any
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —14 —
described in Exhibit C may be amended to add any area annexed to
or remove any area disconnected from, the corporate limits of the
Financing Member.
6.2. Title to Waste. Title to Financing Member System
Waste shall pass to the Agency when it has been accepted by the
Agency at a Transfer Station.
6.3. Wgicthing of L4astg. The Agency shall own, operate,
calibrate and keep in reasonable and accurate working order a
measurement device for weighing Financing Member System Waste
delivered to any Transfer Station.
6.4. Record of Waste. The Agency shall keep daily records
of deliveries of Financing Member System Waste to the Transfer
Stations and shipment of Waste from each Transfer Station in a
form as designated in the rules and regulations of the Agency,
which records shall be available for inspection by any Financing
Member during the normal business hours of the Agency.
6.5. Altgrnate Measurement. In the event that the Agency
measurement device is inoperable, Financing Member System Waste
shall be measured by volume as provided by the rules and
regulations of the Agency.
ARTICLE VII
PAYMENT OBLIGATION
This Article establishes the obligation of the Financing
Member to pay its share of the costs of the Project. Formulaic
descriptions of the obligations described in this Article are
included as Exhibit F to this Agreement.
7.1. Sufficiency of AmguptsEach Financing
Member shall pay an amount sufficient, when taken in the
aggregate, to enable the Agency to pay the Operation and
Maintenance Costs and the Fixed Costs of the Project.
7.2. OMaintenance Costs, As its share of
operation and Maintenance Costs of the Project, the Financing
Member shall pay an.amount equal to the total Operation and
Maintenance Costs for the relevant Fiscal Year multiplied by a
fraction whose numerator is'the Financing Member System Waste
accepted and whose denominator is Agency Waste accepted for the
relevant Fiscal Year.
7.3. LiXed__Cgst . (a) As its share of Fixed Costs of the
Project for any Fiscal Year during which the sum of Agency Waste
and Customer Waste is less than 85% of Expected Agency Waste, the
Financing Member shall pay an amount equal to the total Fixed
Costs for the relevant Fiscal Year multiplied by a fraction
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —13—
pay Financing Expenses with respect to such Component, upon the
approval of 60% of the Directors of the Board then holding
office.
5.5. rosts in Excessof 1 5% of Efitimteo If the
Engineer's report prepared pursuant to Section 5.2 estimates that
the Costs of Construction of the Construction Component to be
financed by the proposed Agency Obligations is more than 125% but
no more than 195% of the cost detailed on Exhibit D, plus the
Inflation Adjustment, then the Agency may issue Agency
Obligations to pay the Costs of Construction of such Construction
Component and to pay Financing Expenses with respect to such
Component, upon the approval of (i) 60% of the Directors of the
Board and (ii) the corporate authorities of 60% of the Financing
Members. Without the consent of the corporate authorities of all
of the Financing Members, the Agency shall not issue Agency
Obligations to pay any costs in excess of 195% of the Costs of
Construction of any Construction Component (except Required Work)
detailed on Exhibit D, plus the Inflation Adjustment.
5.6. !211=1SItion. Upon the completion of each Construction
Component (except Required Work), the Engineer shall certify the
Costs of Construction of such Construction Component. The
positive difference between the Costs of Construction of a
Construction Component described in Exhibit D, plus the Inflation
Adjustment to the date of the certificate minus the certified
Costs of Construction, may be used to increase the cost shown on
Exhibit D for another Construction Component for the purpose of
determining whether the Engineer's report delivered under Section
5.2 for that Construction Component is within the estimate for
the purpose of Section 5.3.
5.7. g ostn. Without the consent of the corporate
authorities of all of the Financing Members, the Agency shall not
issue Agency Obligations for Interim Costs in excess of the
estimate for Interim Costs detailed on Exhibit D, plus the
Inflation Adjustment.
ARTICLE VI
COLLECTION AND DELIVERY OF WASTE TO TRANSFER STATIONS
6.1. EingDQing MgMherWAStO UAtgZ. The Financing Member
has created a Waste System pursuant to Article X hereof and from
and after its Financing Member Delivery Date shall cause the
collection and delivery of its Financing Member ;System, Waste to
the Transfer Station in accordance with the. Agreement and its
ordinance adopted as required by Article X hereof. A description
of the geographic boundaries of the Financing Member Waste System
and the type of Waste included in the Financing Member Waste
System is described in Exhibit C and may not be amended without
the consent of the Agency, except the geographic boundaries
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —12 —
failure to perform its obligations under this Article, the
obligation of the Financing Member to make all payments as
required by this Agreement is unconditional and irrevocable,
without setoff or counterclaim and irrespective of whether the
Project or any Component is ever completed, made available or
provided to the Financing Member or whether any Financing Member
fails to deliver its Financing Member System Waste, and
notwithstanding any suspension, interruption, interference,
reduction or curtailment of the Project or any Component.
ARTICLE V
PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING AGENCY OBLIGATIONS
This Article provides for the procedures pursuant to which
the Agency may issue Agency Obligations to finance the Project.
5.1. Detgrmination tg ISSUg. Except as otherwise provided
in this Article V, the Agency, by a majority vote of the
Directors of the Board then holding office, may determine to
issue Agency Obligations to finance the various Components at
such time, in such amount, and in one or more series as is in the
best interest of the Agency. Before the issuance of Agency
Obligations, the Agency shall notify each Financing Member of its
intent to issue Agency Obligations at least 30 days prior to such
issuance.
5.2. Engineer's Rep2rt. Before issuing Agency Obligations
(for other than Financing Components, Required Work or refundings
of Agency Obligations), the Agency shall cause to be prepared an
Engineer's report estimating the cost of the Construction
Component or Components of the Project to be financed by the
proposed Agency obligations and comparing such costs to be
financed to the estimates contained in Exhibit D.
5.3. Costs within 9stimate. If the Engineer's report
prepared pursuant to Section 5.2 estimates that the Costs of
Construction of the Construction Component to be financed by the
proposed Agency Obligations is not more than the cost as detailed
on Exhibit D, plus the Inflation Adjustment, then the Agency may
issue Agency Obligations to pay the Costs of Construction of such
Construction Component and to pay Financing Expenses with respect
to such Component, upon the approval of a majority of the
Directors of the Board then holding office.
5.4. Costs W" If the Engineer's
report prepared pursuant to Section 5.2 estimates that the Costs
of Construction of the Construction Component to be financed by
the proposed Agency Obligations is more than 100% but no more
than 125% of the cost detailed on Exhibit D, plus the Inflation
Adjustment; then the Agency may issue Agency. Obligations to pay
the Costs of Construction of such Construction Component and to
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —11—
Project in phases and may construct the various Construction
Components and portions of the Project in any order.
(b) Construct and operate the Wheeling Township Transfer
Station, make it available for acceptance of the Financing Member
System Waste of the Initial Users on their respective Financing
Member Delivery Dates and provide for disposal of the Financing
Member System Waste accepted by it.
(c) Construct and operate the Rolling Meadows Transfer
Station, make it available for acceptance of the Financing Member
System Waste of those Financing Members identified in Exhibit B
on their respective Financing Member Delivery Dates and during
the term of this Agreement and shall provide for disposal of the
Financing member System Waste accepted by it.
(d) Provide for the Third Transfer Station, cause it to be
available for acceptance of the Financing Member.System Waste of
those Financing Members identified on Exhibit B on their
respective Financing Member Delivery Dates and during the term of
this Agreement and provide for disposal of the Financing Member
System Waste accepted by it.
(e) Construct and operate the Balefill and make it
available for disposal of Financing Member System Waste accepted
at Transfer Stations.
(f) Borrow in two or more phases the sums necessary to
refund, or otherwise provide for the payment of, its Prior Notes.
(g) Borrow the sums necessary to finance the Interim Costs.
(h) Construct and operate a Landscape Waste Facility.
(i) Undertake and complete all Required Work.
(j) With respect to the Agency's undertakings in
subparagraphs (b), (c) and (d) of this Section, the Agency may
direct Financing Member System Waste to a Transfer Station other
than the one identified on Exhibit B for the Financing Member,
provided that access is provided to a Transfer Station by the
Delivery Date as shown on Exhibit B.
Contipgency of &qgncy ._ .S .Aw_
obligation to initiate and complete the undertaking described in
Section 4.1 above is contingent upon the issuance of the
necessary permitsNIM federal, ',. i localgovernments.
in the event the Agency MM. MNNcompleteProject or any
Component or in the event that after completion,operation of
the Project or any Component thereof is suspended, interrupted,
interfere..witho reduced or .., ,:. Agency
reasonable efforts to find alternate means of disposal of the
Financing Member System Waste. Notwithstanding the Agency's
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —10—
partial year usage, phased -delivery as indicated on Exhibit B,
annexations, disconnections, consolidations, physical disasters
and changes in law or Agency requirements. Upon the request of
the Financing Member, the Agency may further revise the Estimated
Financing Member System Waste for the then current Fiscal Year
subsequent to the commencement of that Fiscal Year to accommodate
unforeseen circumstances such as those listed in the preceding
sentence.
3.2. aeag=A1eness or EXpegtecta see
Waste and Deficiengy Eggtog. The Financing Member acknowledges
that the determination of its Expected Financing Member System
Waste and Deficiency Factor are reasonable. The Financing Member
further acknowledges (i) that an allocation of 100% of the Fixed
Costs of the Agency among the Financing Members on the basis that
all Financing Members will deliver at least 85% of their
respective Expected Financing Member System Waste to the Agency
is an equitable method for determining its share of the Fixed
Costs of the Project and (ii) that an allocation of the default
risk of the Project among Financing Members on the basis of the
Deficiency Factor is an equitable method for sharing risk of the
Project.
From and after .1111 the F 11 i 11 nancing Member's Delivery Date through the
term of this Agreement, the Financing Member shall deliver or
cause to be delivered its Financing Member System Waste to the
Agency.
3.4. Oblicration. As long as Agency Obligations are
outstanding, the Financing Member shall make all payments as
required'by this Agreement, without setoff or counterclaim and
irrespective of whether the Project or any Component is ever
completed, made available or provided to the Financing Member or
whether any Financing Member fails to deliver its Financing
Member System Waste, and notwithstanding any suspension,
interruption, interference, reduction or curtailment of the
Project or any Component.
ARTICLE IV
AGENCY UNDERTAKING REGARDING THE PROJECT
4.1. jZndertaking Regarding the Project. .The Agency shall
use its best efforts to:
(a) Construct and operate those Construction Components of
the Project which will enable it to accept for disposal all
Financing Member System Waste from and after such Waste is
scheduled to be delivered to the Agency, provided that the Agency
may construct any Construction Component or portion of the
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —9 —
2.52. IlTrusteell means the trustee or trustees for the
benefit of the owners of the Agency.Obligations, appointed as
provided in the Master Bond Resolution.
2.53. "Wastell means garbage, general household,
institutional and commercial waste, industrial lunchroom or
office waste, and construction or demolition debris, excluding
landscape waste, which may by law and regulation be deposited at
a Transfer Station and which satisfies the Agency's requirements.
2.54. "Wheeling Township Transfer Station" means the
Transfer Station, including the flood control work and the
administrative building related thereto, expected to be
constructed by the Agency northeast of the intersection of
Central Road and Des Plaines River Road in unincorporated cook
County, Illinois as a part of the Project.
ARTICLE III
EXPECTED FINANCING MEMBER SYSTEM WASTE
3.1. Dete rM inat ions gf E2Wect2!Ae sre .
Waste anda (a) The Agency and the Financing
Member have determined the Expected Financing Member System Waste
of the Financing Member as detailed in Exhibit B in order to
design the capacity of the Project. The Agency and the Financing
Member have determined the Deficiency Factor as detailed in
Exhibit E in order to allocate the default risk of the Project.
This determination is based, in part, on population and waste
estimates for each Financing Member for the year 2003. The
Agency and the Financing Member agree that the determinations
made with respect to Exhibit B and Exhibit E are fair and
equitable.
(b) The schedule of Expected Financing Member System Waste
detailed in Exhibit B will be revised annually by the Agency for
each Financing Member commencing March 1 of the first Fiscal Year
after the Financing Member Delivery Date for such Financing
Member during the term of this Agreement. These revisions shall
be effective on May 1 of each such year. The first annual
revision of the Expected Financing Member System Waste shall be
based on the actual Financing Member System Waste for the
previous Fiscal Year. The second annual revision of the Expected
Financing Member System Waste shall be based on the average of
the actual Financing Member System Waste of the Financing Member
for the two previous Fiscal Years. The revised Expected
Financing Member System Waste for each subsequent Fiscal Year
shall be based on the average of the actual Financing Member
System Waste of the Financing Member for the three years prior to
such Fiscal Year. The Agency shall determine such revisions
after consultation with the Financing Member. Such
determinations shall -take into account, among other things,
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —8—
(ii) occurs with respect to a month following a month with
respect to which no Deficiency Charge has been imposed.
2.42. 11Prior Notes@' means the Agency's $16,250,000 Contract
Revenue Notes, Series 1990, issued on May 1, 1990.
2.43. "Prior Notes Refundings" means the Financing
Component pursuant to which the Agency will refund its Prior
Notes.
2.44. IlProject's means a "waste project" as defined in
Section 3.2(j)(ii) of the Act undertaken by or on behalf of the
Agency consisting of the Financing Components and the
Construction Components, which may be undertaken in any order.
2.45. I'Project Budget" means the budget regarding the
Project adopted each Fiscal Year by the Agency.
2.46. "Required Work*# shall mean repairs, maintenance,
renewals, replacements, improvements or betterments required by
federal or state law, a licensing or regulatory agency with
jurisdiction over the Project or any Construction Component, or
this Agreement, or otherwise determined to be necessary by a
majority of the Directors of the Board then holding office to
keep the Project or any Construction Component in good and
efficient operating condition, consistent with (1) sound
economics for the Project and the Financing Members and (2)
standards for the industry.
2.47. I'Rolling Meadows Transfer Station" means the Transfer
Station expected to be constructed by the Agency at 3851 Berdnick
Street in the City of Rolling Meadows, Illinois as a part of the
Project.
2.48. '#Subsequent Phase I Deficiency#$ means a Deficiency
which requires the imposition of a Deficiency Charge on Financing
Members which (i) occurs prior to the Majority Service Date and
(ii) occurs with respect to a month following a month with
respect to which a Deficiency Charge has been imposed.
2.49. "Supplemental Bond Resolution#$ means a resolution of
the Agency authorizing the issuance of Agency Obligations in
accordance with the Master Bond Resolution.
2.50. '$Transfer Station's means the Wheeling Township
Transfer Station, the Rolling Meadows Transfer Station, the Third
Transfer Station or any other transfer station constructed, owned
or leased by the Agency.
2.51. IlThird Transfer Stations# means the Transfer Station
expected to be leased or constructed and owned by the Agency, the
location of which .has not been determined by the Agency as of the
date hereof, as part of the Project.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —7—
related to payment of the costs enumerated in clauses (i) through
(v), (vii) to establish and maintain debt service reserve
accounts, (viii) to comply with the covenants of the Master Bond
Resolution with respect to all costs except as they pertain to
Operation and Maintenance Costs, and (ix) to pay reasonable
capital costs and costs of service, equipment and supply
contracts necessary to carry out the corporate purposes and
powers of the Agency with respect to the Project.
2.32. "Future User'$ means a Financing Member not listed on
Exhibit A to this Agreement.
2.33. "Independent Financial Consultant') means an
individual or firm having a favorable reputation for skill and
experience as a financial advisor for issuers of municipal bonds.
2.34. "Inflation Adjustment" means the adjustment to the
Costs of Construction made by application of the building cost
index for the Chicago metropolitan area available through the
"Engineering News -Record."
2.35. "Initial User" means a Financing Member listed on
Exhibit A to this Agreement.
2.36. "Interim Costs1l means the costs relating to (i) the
permitting, engineering and initial construction of the Balefill,
and (ii) general and administrative costs of the Agency,
including professional fees, until the Balefill is operational.
2.37. "Landscape Waste Facility"I means a facility to be
built by the Agency which will dispose of landscape waste.
2.38. "Majority service Date" means the earlier to occur of
(i) the date on which at least a majority of the members of the
Agency are delivering Financing Member System Waste to a Transfer
Station, (ii) the date on which the Agency commences construction
of or makes lease payments for a second Transfer Station, or
(iii) January 1, 1996.
2.39. "Master Bond Resolutionif means the Agency's master
bond resolution, as it may be amended from time to time under
which the Agency will authorize the issuance of and issue Agency
Obligations.
2.40. $#Operation and Maintenance Costs@# means an amount
sufficient at all times to pay those costs of the Project which
vary as a function of the amount of Waste delivered to the
Project and do not constitute Fixed Costs.
2.41. "Phase I Deficiencyse means a Deficiency which
requires the imposition of a Deficiency Charge on Financing
Members which (i) occurs prior to the Majority Service Date and
3046299 Ver'2 1/29/92 15:41 —6—
2.21. "Expected Agency Waste'$ means the sum of the Expected
Financing Member System Waste of all of the Financing Members for
the relevant Fiscal Year.
2.22. "Expected Financing Member System Waste# means the
Waste expected to be generated within the Financing Member Waste
System for any Fiscal Year, as determined under Section 3.1.
2.23. '#Financing Components1l means the Prior Notes
Refundings and the Interim Costs.
2.24. $$Financing Expenses" means expenses related to the
issuance of Agency Obligations, including costs of issuance,
reserve funds, capitalized interest and credit enhancement fees
and expenses.
2.25. IfFinancing Member40 means a member of the Agency which
is a party to an Agreement.
2.26. "Financing Member Costs1* means all costs and charges
imposed on the Financing Member under this Agreement.
2.27. "Financing Member Delivery Date#' means the date on
which the Financing Member is scheduled to commence delivering
Waste to the Agency as detailed on Exhibit B to this Agreement.
2.28. "Financing Member System Waster' means, for each
Financing Member, the Waste identified by type generated and the
geographic area or areas of such generation as defined by the
Financing Member Waste System.
2.29. ''$Financing Member Waste System" means, for each
Financing Member, the waste collection and transportation system
from time to time, as defined in the ordinance meeting the
requirements of Article X of this Agreement. The term Financing
Member Waste System includes all financial and physical assets of
the Financing Member Waste System. A copy of the Financing
Member's ordinance establishing such Financing Member Waste
System is attached as Exhibit C to this Agreement:
2.30. "Fiscal Year'$ means the fiscal year of the Agency
commencing May 1 of any year and concluding April 30 of the
following year.
2.31. '#Fixed Costs#' means an amount sufficient at all times
to pay all those costs of the Project which do not vary as a
function of the amount of Waste delivered to the Project,
including, but not limited to, the costs (i) to pay the principal
of and premium, if any, and interest on Agency Obligations, (ii)
to establish and maintain a conservation fund, (iii) to establish
and maintain a renewal and replacement fund, (iv) to establish
and maintain a self-insurance fund, (v) to establish and maintain
a rebate fund, (vi) to provide and maintain required reserves
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —5—
(f) any sums required to reimburse the Agency or any
other lawfully authorized person for advances made by any of
them for any of the above items, or for any other costs
incurred and for work done by any of them, which are
properly chargeable to development and construction
including, without limitation, administrative expenses
attributable to the period prior to completion of the
Project;
(g) the payment of any obligations of the Agency
(including any interest and redemption premiums) other than
the Prior Notes incurred to temporarily finance the payment
of any costs of the Project or any Component; and
(h) such other costs and expenses not specified herein
as may be necessary or incidental to development,
acquisition and construction, and operation during
construction, of all or any part of the Project or any
Construction Component, the financing thereof and the
placing of the same in use and operation.
2.13. "Customer Waste" means all waste accepted by the
Agency at a Transfer Station which is not Financing Member System
Waste of any Financing Member.
2.14. "Deficiency" means, as of the first day of any month,
the amount by which revenues, either actual or projected, are
insufficient to meet known expenses.
2.15. "Deficiency Charge'# means, as of the first day of any
month, the amount determined and charged by the Agency to meet a
Deficiency and to be paid by the Financing Members.
2.16. "Deficiency Factor" means the factor used in
allocating each Financing Member"s share of a Deficiency Charge
as detailed in Exhibit E to this Agreement.
2.17. "Deposit" means the deposit described in Section 8.11
of this Agreement.
2.18. "Engineer" means an engineer or engineering firm or
corporation having a favorable reputation for skill and
experience in the design and construction of solid waste transfer
stations and landfills.
2.19. "Excess Waste" means the Financing Member System
Waste which is in excess of 115% of its Expected Financing Member
System Waste for that Fiscal Year.
2.20. "Excessive Use Charge" means the charge imposed
pursuant to Section 7.4 for delivering more than 115% of Expected
Financing Member System Waste in any Fiscal Year.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —4—
2.7. "Available Revenuesle means Available Revenues as
defined under the Master Bond Resolution.
2.8. "Balefill" means the facility which will receive Waste
from one or more Transfer Stations for disposal into individually
constructed cells which is expected to be constructed by the
Agency near West Bartlett and Gifford Roads in Hanover Township
in unincorporated Cook County, Illinois as a part of the Project.
2.9. "Board## means the Board of Directors of the Agency.
2.10. "Components's means the Construction Components and
the Financing Components.
2.11. "Construction Components## means the Wheeling Township
Transfer Station, the Rolling Meadows Transfer Station, the Third
Transfer Station, the Balefill, the Landscape Waste Facility and
Required Work.
2.12. "Costs of Construction'@ means and shall include,
together with any other proper item of cost properly capitalized
but not specifically mentioned herein, the following costs and
expenses of the Agency in connection with or incidental to the
completion of the Project or any Construction Component:
(a) the costs and expenses for labor, equipment,
supplies and materials, and payments to contractors,
builders, suppliers and materialmen in connection with
construction and improvement (excluding any costs and
expenses described in subparagraph (c) below);
(b) the cost of contract bonds and of insurance of all
kinds that may be required or necessary during the course of
development and construction;
(c) the costs and expenses of test borings, surveys,
site investigations, the acquisition of real or personal
property or interests therein, provisions to indemnify or
secure a seller of any such property or interests therein,
demolition of any buildings or structures and other site
preparation costs necessary for development and
construction, and supervising construction, as well as the
performance of all duties required by or consequent upon
proper construction;
(d) the costs and expenses of acquiring or leasing
equipment, machinery and rolling stock to be used in
conjunction with a Construction Component or the Project,
including equipment used to transport Waste;
(e) fees and expenses for architectural, engineering,
legal and other professional services with respect to the
Project or any Construction Component during construction;
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —3—
Contract Revenue and Bond Anticipation Notes, Series 1989 on
December 6, 1989 and its Prior Notes on May 1, 1990. The Agency
and each of its twenty-six members entered into separate
agreements, each dated as of April 16, 1990, in order to provide
for the payment of principal of and interest on the Prior Notes.
In order to pay the costs of the Project, including the cost of
purchasing or paying the, Prior Notes and relieving the obligation
of the Financing Members to pay the costs, of the Prior Notes, the
Agency and the Financing Members will enter into separate
Agreements.
1.6. Under the Agreements, each Financing Member agrees
that it will be liable to pay amounts to the Agency which
together with all amounts paid by other Financing Members will be
sufficient in the aggregate to pay the costs of the Project.
1.7. The Agency will issue Agency Obligations from time to
time to finance certain costs of the Project.
1.8. It is necessary and in the best interests of the
Financing Member and the Agency for each of them to enter into
this Agreement in order for (a) the Financing Member to
participate in and make use of the Project as a means of
processing, storing and disposing of its municipal waste and
(b) the Agency to pay the costs of the Project.
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
2.1. "Act" means the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, as
amended (Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 127, 13 741-749 (1989)).
2.2. "Agency' means the Solid Waste Agency of Northern
Cook County.
2.3. "Agency Agreement" means An Agreement Establishing the
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County as a Municipal Joint
Action Agency, dated as of May 2, 1988, as it may be amended from
time to time.
2.4. "Agency Obligations$$ means all bonds, notes and other
forms of indebtedness of the Agency payable or secured in whole
or in part from revenues derived from the operation of the
Project and issued after the date hereof.
2.5. "Agency Waste" means the sum of the Financing Member -
System Waste of all the Financing Members accepted by the Agency
for any Fiscal Year.
2.6. "Agreement" means this Agreement and a similar
Agreement with each of the Financing Members.
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —2—
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK COUNTY
PROJECT USE AGREEMENT
THIS PROJECT USE AGREEMENT is entered into by and between
the SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK COUNTY and the
as of , 1992.
ARTICLE I
RECITALS
1.1. Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Constitution of
the State of Illinois and the Act authorize "units of local
government" to contract and associate among themselves to obtain
or share services and to exercise, combine, or transfer any power
or function in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance.
1.2. Section 3.2 of the Act authorizes any two or more
municipalities and counties as units of local government to
establish by an intergovernmental agreement a municipal joint
action agency as a municipal corporation and public body politic
and corporate in order to provide for an efficient and
environmentally sound municipal waste system.
1.3. Pursuant to this authority and the Agency Agreement,
the Agency was established. The members of the Agency consist of
twenty-six units of local government located primarily in
northern Cook County, Illinois. The Agency has been created to
establish a waste system to provide for efficient and
environmentally sound collection, transportation, transfer,
processing, treatment, storage, disposal, recovery and reuse of
municipal waste.
1.4. To develop this waste system, the Agency has initiated
steps to acquire, construct, operate, equip and improve the
Project. Toward such end, the Agency has contracted for the
preparation of detailed design and engineering plans for the
Project, has acquired sites and options and other rights with
respect to sites for the Project and has obtained certain zoning,
land use and environmental permits. The Agency now intends to
obtain other necessary governmental permits, to acquire
additional sites or interests in sites for the Project or to
acquire options therefor, to complete design of the Project, to
acquire equipment for the Project, to construct and operate the
Project, and to do all other things necessary or desirable to
acquire, construct, operate, equip and improve the Project.
1.5. In order to pay certain costs of the Project, the
Agency issued its $5,500,000 Contract Revenue and Bond
Anticipation Notes, Series 1988 on May 25, 1988, its $2,000,000
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41
13.7 .
Cooperation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 30
13.8.
Notices . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . 30
31
13.9.
Amendment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
31
13.10.
Severability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . .
13.11.
Waiver . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •
. . . , 31
13.12.
Governing Law . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 31
13.13.
Local Government Financial Planning
and Supervision Act . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . 31
EXHIBIT A Initial Users
EXHIBIT B Financing Member Delivery Date and Expected Financing
Member System Waste
EXHIBIT C Financing Member Waste System
EXHIBIT D Estimated Costs of Components of Project
EXHIBIT E Deficiency Factor
EXHIBIT F Formulas
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 _V_
ARTICLE X
FINANCING MEMBER COVENANTS
10.1.
Financing Member Waste System . . . . . . . . . .
. 21
10.2.
Rules and Regulations of Financing Member
Waste System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 21
10.3.
Enforcement of Rules and Regulations . . . . . .
. 21
10.4.
Financial Covenant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 21
10.5.
Segregation of Revenue . . . . . . . . . . .
. 21
10.6.
Payments from Financing Member Waste System . . .
. 22
10.7.
Books and Accounts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 22
10.8.
Budget Adoption . . . . . .
. 22
10.9.
Financing Member Obligations Subordinate . . . .
. 22
10.10.
Tax Matters . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 22
10.11.
Financing Member Waste System Ordinance . . . . .
. 24
10.12.
No Competition with Financing Member
Waste System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 25
ARTICLE XI
RECYCLING INCENTIVE
11.1. Recycling Incentive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
ARTICLE XII
DEFAULTS AND REMEDIES
12.1. Financing Member Defaults . . . . . . . . . . 26
12.2. Agency Remedies in Event of Financing
Member Default . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
12.3. Defaulting Financing Member Obligations
Continue to Accrue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26
12.4. Agency Defaults . . . . . . . . . 27
12.5. Financing Member Remedies in Event of Agency
Default . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
12.6. Force Majeure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27
ARTICLE XIII
MISCELLANEOUS
13.1. Distribution of Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
13.2. Term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
13.3. Effective Date . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
13.4. Financing Member Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28
13.5. Agency Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
13.6. Assignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:61 — iv—
ARTICLE VI
COLLECTION AND DELIVERY OF
WASTE TO TRANSFER STATIONS
6.1. Financing Member Waste System . . . . . . . . . . . 12
6.2. Title to Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6.3. Weighing of Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6.4. Record of Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
6.5. Alternate Measurement . . . . . . . • . . . . . . . 13
ARTICLE VII
PAYMENT OBLIGATION
7.1. Sufficiency of Amounts to be Paid . . . . . . . . . 13
7.2. Operation and Maintenance Costs . . . . . . . . . . 13
7.3. Fixed Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
7.4. Excessive Use Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
7.5. Deficiency Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
7.6. Obligations upon Withdrawal . . . . . • . . . . . . 15
ARTICLE VIII
PAYMENT MECHANISM
8.1.
Project Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
15
8.2. ~
Bills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
8.3.
Time of Payment; Late Charges . . . . . . . . . . .
16
8.4.
Interest on Overdue Amounts . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
8.5.
Reservation of Remedies . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
8.6.
Partial Payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
16
8.7.
Nature of Obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
17
8.8.
Payments from Revenues of Financing Member
Waste System. . .
17
8.9.
Deficiency Charge Payments of Home -Rule Units as
General Obligation . . . . . . . ... . . . .
17
8.10.
Payments from Operation and 'Maintenance Account . .
17
8.11.
Payments from Non -Waste System Revenue . . . . . .
17
8.12.
Budgets and Bills as Estimates . . . . . . . . .
18
8.13.
Disputes. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19
8.14.
Pledges. . . . . . . . . . . .
19
ARTICLE IX
AGENCY COVENANTS
9.1. Covenants Regarding the Project . . . . . . . . . . 19
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —iii—
2.38.
"Majority Service Date" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.39.
"Master Bond Resolution" . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.40.
"Operation and Maintenance Costs" . . . . . . . . . 6
2.41.
"Phase 1 Deficiency" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.42.
"Prior Notes" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.43.
"Prior Notes Refundings" . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.44.
"Project" . . . . . . . 7
2.45.
"Project Budget" . . . . . 7
2.46.
"Required Work" . . . .. . . . . . . . . 7
2.47.
"Rolling Meadows Transfer Station" . . . . . . . . 7
2.48.
"Subsequent Phase I Deficiency" . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.49.
"Supplemental Bond Resolution" . . . . . . . 7
2.50.
"Transfer Station" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.51.
"Third Transfer Station" . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.52.
"Trustee" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
2.53.
"Waste" . . . . .w . . . . . . . 8
2.54.
"Wheeling Township Transfer Station" . . . . . . . 8
ARTICLE III
EXPECTED FINANCING MEMBER SYSTEM WASTE
3.1. Determinations of Expected Financing Member
System Waste and Deficiency Factor . . . . . 8
3.2. Reasonableness of Expected Financing Member
System Waste and Deficiency Factor . . . . . . . 9
3.3. Commitment to Deliver Financing Member
System Waste . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.4. Payment Obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
ARTICLE IV
AGENCY UNDERTAKING REGARDING THE PROJECT
4.1. Undertaking Regarding the Project . . . . . . . . . 9
4.2. Contingency of Agency Undertaking . . . . . . . . . 10
ARTICLE V
PROCEDURE FOR ISSUING AGENCY OBLIGATIONS
5.1. Determination to Issue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.2. Engineer's Report . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
5.3. Costs Within Estimate . . . . . . . . . .. . 11
5.4. Costs Within 125% of Estimate . . . . . . . . . 11
5.5. Costs in Excess of 125% of Estimate . . . . . . . . 12
5.6. Cumulation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
5.7 Interim Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 —ii—
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Pane
ARTICLE I
RECITALS
1.1. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
2.1.
"Act" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2
2.2.
"Agency" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2
2.3.
"Agency Agreement" . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 2
2.4.
"Agency Obligations" . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2
2.5.
"Agency Waste" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2
2.6.
"Agreement" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 2
2.7.
"Available Revenues" . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 3
2.8.
"Balefill" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 3
2.9.
"Board" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 3
2.10.
"Components" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 3
2.11.
"Construction Components" . . . . . . . . .
. 3
2.12.
"Costs of Construction" . . . . . . . . .
3
2.13.
"Customer Waste" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2.14.
"Deficiency" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2.15.
"Deficiency Charge" . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2.16.
"Deficiency Factor" . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2.17.
"Deposit" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2.18.
"Engineer" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2.19.
"Excess Waste" . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. » 4
2.20.
"Excessive Use Charge" . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
2.21.
"Expected Agency Waste" . . . . .. . . .
. . 5
2.22.
"Expected Financing Member System Waste"
. 5
2.23.
"Financing Components" . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 5
2.24.
"Financing Expenses" . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 5
2.25.
"Financing Member" . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 5
2.26.
"Financing Member Costs" . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 5
2.27.
"Financing Member Delivery Date" . . . . . . .
5
2.28.
"Financing Member System Waste" . . . . . . . .
. . 5
2.29.
"Financing Member Waste System" . . . . . . .
. . 5
2.30.
"Fiscal Year" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 5
2.31.
"Fixed Costs" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. 5
2.32.
"Future User" . . »» . . . .
. 6
2.33.
"Independent Financial Consultant". . . . . . .
. . 6
2.34.
"Inflation Adjustment" . . . . . . . . . . . .
. » 6
2.35.
"Initial User" . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . 6
2.36.
"Interim Costs" .. . . . . . . . . . .
. . 6
2.37.
"Landscape Waste Facility" . . . . . . . . .
. . 6
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41 — i—
PROJECT USE AGREEMENT
by and between
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF
NORTHERN COOK COUNTY
and
VILLAGE/CITY OF If
ILLINOIS
Dated: , 1992
3046299 Ver 2 1/29/92 15:41
DRAFT 1/29/92
1. Establishnint of Rates and Charges (Article VIII)
a. Members must establish a system of rates and charges
for residents for municipal waste services in their
community except as in (c) below. Revenues from these
rates and charges must be deposited and accounted for
in a separate Enterprise Fund.
b. Monthly billings from SWANCC must be paid from revenues
in the Enterprise Fund except that the Deficiency
Charge is a general obligation of Home -Rule
communities.
C. Members wishing to pay solid waste charges from other
than their Enterprise Fund, must show sufficiency of
revenues from taxes or a cash deposit or a combination
thereof.
a. Monthly billings from SWANCC will reflect, and
municipal rates and charges must be set to include, all
fixed and variable costs.
3. Enforcement (Article X)
a. Each Member must agree to vigorously enforce the rules
and regulations and diligently pursue collection of
revenues.
3044991 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:26 -14-
4. Waste Control
a. SWANCC takes title to waste when it is accepted at a
Transfer Station.
b. SWANCC can assess penalties against those who deliver
unacceptable types of waste. Penalty will be cost plus
20 percent to remove and dispose of unacceptable waste
elsewhere.
C. Flow Control Ordinance adopted by Members by the time
Agreements are signed but implemented as Member starts
to use the system. Each Member will be required to
regulate its haulers controlling their pick-up and
requiring delivery of waste to the system. (Article X
Section 10.11)
d. SWANCC has authority to determine which transfer
station is used by which Users. When Project Use
Agreements are signed there will be an estimate of
which members will use which station, but SWANCC can
change this to achieve a more efficient, overall
system.
3044975 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:21 -13-
WASTE FLOW DEFINITION AND CONTROL
1. Definition of Service Areas (Article.III)
a. At the time the Project Use Agreements are signed, all
Members will define their residential service area and
estimate the amount of waste to be delivered for life
of the system. Commercial service area is not
necessarily the same as residential service area, and
commercial waste estimates will be based on tonnage.
b. This is required even if Member will not use the
initial phases of the system.
C. The boundaries of the residential service areas are
expected but not required to be the same as municipal
boundaries.
d. 100 percent of waste within defined boundaries of
residential service area must be delivered to SWANCC
over the life of the Agreement.
2. Chancres in. Service Areas (Article VI)
a. Geographic boundaries of service areas and type of
waste delivered may not be changed without prior Board
consent, except that boundaries can be adjusted for
annexation or disconnection.
b. Only waste from newly annexed areas can be added in the
future, without prior SWANCC consent.
C. Commercial waste boundaries need not be designated or
may be changed prior to User's initial delivery date
without Agency consent provided volume is not changed.
3. Waste Estimates (Article III)
a. The 2003 waste estimate will serve as the basis for the
Deficiency Factor and will not change.
b. Each year the initial waste estimates will be adjusted
by a formula based on actual waste delivery in prior
years. The formula will be the rolling average of the
waste delivered over the prior 3 years, adjusted for
changes such as phased -in delivery, annexations,
changes in law, etc.
3044975 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:21 -12 -
DEFICIENCY CHARGE (continued)
d. If the Users of the wheeling transfer station do not
collectively meet their obiigation to guarantee their
90% portion, the non -Users will be obligated to pay
such obligation in accordance with (1) above.
� �=TERM �-W 117T 1 W. - .1t -Wel
a. The Deficiency Charge of each member will be one of two
types. For home rule units, it will be a general
obligation of the Member. For non -home rule units, it
will be an obligation of tite Member's municipal solid
waste revenue system. III
3044995 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:23 _11—
DEFICIENCY CHARGE
mmmnl� �-MCFVM 0*34
a. The Deficiency Charge is designed to protect the
bondholder against the risk of project failure, non -
completion or premature closing, or default in a
payment obligation.
b. The Deficiency Charge is triggered when there is a
projected insufficiency in revenues to meet the
obligations of SWANCC (i.e. the Deficiency Charge is
not triggered by a minor cash flow problem).
C. All Members who sign Agreements, even if they are not
Users of the initial phase of the project, are
obligated for their portion of the Deficiency Charge.
d. Liability for the Deficiency Charge will be based on
2003 waste estimates.
e. The Deficiency Charge includes a step-up provision, as
with the Notes, not to exceed a Member's liability by
more than a third.
f. The Deficiency Charge is binding on all Members for the
life of the bonds.
a. During the phase-in, not all Members will share the
benefits at the same time. In order to allocate the
default risk to those who benefit from the initial
phase (i.e. the Users of the Wheeling transfer
station), the Deficiency Charge is weighted to shift a
larger portion of the default risk to the Users of the
Wheeling transfer station.
b. The shift in risk is reallocated by requiring the Users
of the Wheeling transfer station to cover the
Deficiency Charge for 90% of the direct costs of that
transfer station. The remaining 10% is guaranteed by
the Members not using the Wheeling transfer station.
C. This reallocation is in effect until the earlier of the
opening of a second transfer station, a majority of the
Members becoming Users or January 1, 1996. From that
point forward, the Deficiency Charge is allocated as
described in (1) above.
3044985 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:23 — 10—
4. Revenues in excess of Find C2AM
a. Since the fixed costs are met if 85 percent of the
waste is delivered, User payments for waste delivered
above 85 percent are revenue to be used as determined
by the Board, subject to limitations in the Bond
Resolution. Eligible uses include rate reduction.
b. Prior to the date an which a majority of Members have
the opportunity to become Users, excess net revenues
from operation of the Wheeling transfer station, after
all other obligations have been met, will be used to
reduce User rates. (Section 9.1(h))
a. The put -or -pay guarantee will be based on the Users'
estimate of waste to be delivered.
b. The put -or -pay guarantee only applies to Users as they
are phased -in to the system. When all phases are
complete all the Members will be obligated under the
put -or -pay guarantee.
3044994 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:18 —9—
PUT -OR -PAY GUARANTEE
Guarantee Covers Fixed Costs (Article VII)
a. The authorizing State legislation permits agencies such
as SWANCC to enter into contracts with put -or -pay
provisions. Users must commit and bring, or pay as if
they brought, 85 percent of their waste estimate. The
put -or -pay guarantee will cover all costs of the System
which do not vary directly and immediately with usage,
i.e. all Fixed Costs.
b. These "Fixed Costs" include:
- debt service on bonds, increasing as each phase of
bonds is issued
- accumulation of reserve funds
- on-going capital expenditures, which are not
financed
- debt service coverage requirements
- contracts for services, equipment or supplies
2. Implementation of Guarantee (Article VII)
a. the put -or -pay guarantee is triggered if a User,
delivers less than 85 percent of estimated waste in
that year and if the total amount of waste delivered to
the Agency is less than 85 percent of the expected
waste.
a. Charges (dollars per ton) will be calculated on
assumption that User delivers 85 percent rather than
100 percent of waste in that year. This permits Users
to reduce waste stream through recycling or waste
reduction without triggering the put -or -pay guarantee.
b. Monthly billing to each User will be based on delivery
of 100 percent of estimated waste.
3044994 Ver 1 1/29/92 1608 —8—
each Member will be required to provide a guarantee
against default. See following description of
Deficiency Charge.
3044974 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:29 -7-
PAYMENT FOR THE SYSTEM AND ITS COMPONENTS
1. General
a. As a general principal, the system or a component will
be paid for by those who use the system or component on
the basis of that use.
a. An annual budget, including fixed and variable costs
and required reserves, will be established and Users
will be billed 1/12th of this amount each month.
b. Monthly costs will be allocated based on the up -front
estimates of waste to be delivered.
C. At the end of the year there will be a "true -up" based
on actual usage. Credits and debits will be applied to
the next year's bills.
d. Extraordinary and unexpected expenses associated with
operation of the facilities during the year can be
covered by an increase in charges to Users based on a
revised budget authorized by the Board. The Members
shall receive 30 days, prior notice of the meeting at
which such amended budget is to be adopted.
a. As transfer stations are added in phases, budgeting and
billing will be extended to include new Users.
b. It is planned to have uniform charges across the
system, therefore these charges will change as transfer
stations open and Users are added.
4. Guarantees
a. To access the credit markets, to protect the Members
against over -use or under -use by other Members and to
assure sufficient revenues to operate the system, each
Member will be required to estimate its waste
deliveries and deliver that waste. If they do not
deliver the waste they must pay as if they had
delivered. See following description of Put -or -Pay
Guarantee.
b. In order to provide creditors with protection against
failure of the system, or failure of a User to pay,
3044974 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:29 -6-
prior bond issues exceeded the estimates, then the cost
test is not calculated cumulatively.
4. SW NCC Obligations (Article IV)
a. SWANCC will be obligated in the Project Use Agreements
to use its best efforts to construct and operate the
system.
b. SWANCC is,also obligated to find disposal site for
waste delivered to transfer stations prior to
completion of Balefill. i
3044981 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:27 -5-
THE AGENCY'S AUTHORITY TO BUILD SYSTEM
Phasing and associated costs «- -« in Prolegt Use
Agreements
a. Project Use Agreements will define each phase of -
overall project, provide inflation adjusted estimates
of costs for each phase, identify members expected to
be users of each phase and their expected use.
2. Anorgyal for Bond Issues (Article V of Proiect Use
Agreement)
a. Type of approval necessary for bond issue associated
with each phase depends upon cost estimates.
b. If capital cost of phase does not exceed inflation
adjusted estimates, bonds for each phase can be issued
by a majority vote of the Board of Directors.
C. If the capital costs for a given phase exceed the cost
estimates plus the inflation factor by 25 percent or
less, additional bonds can only be issued by a 60
percent majority vote of the Board of Directors.
d. If the capital costs for a given phase exceed cost
estimates plus the inflation factor by more than 25
percent but less than 95 percent, the Board of
Directors will not be authorized to issue bonds until
the issuance has been approved by 60 percent of the
member boards participating in the project use
agreement. once member support is secured, the SWANCC
Board may issue bonds on a 60 percent majority vote of
the Board of Directors.
e. If capital costs of a phase of the project exceed 95
percent of the original cost estimates, the Board of
Directors will not be authorized to issue bonds until
the issuance has been approved by all of the member
boards participating in the project use agreement.
a. The engineer's final estimate of costs will be the
basis for measuring whether costs exceed estimates.
b. If in prior bond issues costs were below the inflation
adjusted estimates, then the cost test for the current
bond issue can be calculated cumulatively taking into
account the cost of prior bond issues. If costs in
3044491 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:27 —4—
W*11304440A* 04�*4#A:44151
M"q
— Date Activity/Eventz
Jan. 15 -
March 11 Member Communities Approval of Project Use
Agreement (PUA)
Jan. 16 Transfer Station operator Proposals Due
March 11 S Board Approval of PUA
April I Bond offering
April 15 Bond Sale
April 27 Bond Closing
3045000 Ver 1 1/29/92 16-26 -3-
b. Members will commit in the Project Use Agreements to
deliver their waste on the established date and to make
payments based on use.
C. The waste delivery date can only be changed by SWANCC
if opening of a facility is delayed.
d. SWANCC is not obligated to provide any service to
members who do not sign Project Use Agreements now.
Such members can be included as new Customers in the
future if capacity of the system permits. Members who
do not sign the new Project Use Agreements are still
obligated under the outstanding Interim Project Use
Agreements, i.e., must pay their share of the
outstanding $16.25 million in notes beginning may 1,
1992.
e. Rates will be established on a system -wide basis so
that the tipping fee will be the same at each transfer
station.
3044989 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:24 —2 —
PHASING -IN THE SYSTEM
INTRODUCTION
In late 1991, the Board of Directors of the Solid Waste
Agency of Northern Cook County approved a multi-year financing
plan for SWANCC. That plan is designed to address the immediate
financial needs of the Agency and its members and provide for the
phased construction of the transfer stations and Balefill. The
first bond issue, scheduled for spring of 1992 will raise money
to refinance the member communities', existing financial
obligations, eliminate member equity contributions to SWANCC and
fund construction of the 1000 ton per day Wheeling Township
Transfer Station and complete permitting of the Balefill. These
activities were selected first to avoid substantial member
payments on the existing debt and respond to a,worsening solid
waste crisis and cost increase brought on by this year's
anticipated landfill closures.
This report provides an overview of the phased financing
plan and a summary of some key elements in the intergovernmental
contract (called a project use agreement or PUA) that will back
the issuance of SWANCC bonds and guarantee member use of the
Balefill and transfer station system. In order to participate in
the financing, each community and the Agency must adopt an
ordinance authorizing its execution.
The expectation is that construction and financing of the
system will be phased -in over the next three years. Exact timing
is not yet known but the Timetable outlines the estimated
schedule for the first bond issue. Project Use Agreements will
be executed which will authorize the Agency to build the system
in phases and provide for the Members to use the system and its
components and to pay its costs.
The phases are expected to be:
Refinancing of part of 1990 Notes
New Money for Wheeling Transfer Station and Interim Project
Costs
New Money for Rolling Meadows Transfer Station
Refinancing of Rest of 1990 Notes
New Money for Balefill
Addition of a Third Transfer Station
a. Each SWANCC member will be able to decide when it will
begin to deliver waste to the Agency between the period
January of 1994 through January of 1996.
3044989 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:24 —1—
Table of Contents
Page
Phasing -In of the System . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Preliminary Timetable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
The Agency's Authority to Build System . . . . . . . . 4
Payment for the System and its Components . . . . . . 6
Put -or -Pay Guarantee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Deficiency Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Waste Flow Definition and Control . . . . . . . . . . 12
Municipal Rates and Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
3044997 ver 1 1/29/92 16:22
SUMMARY .EY POLICY ISSUES
IN
PROJECT USE AGREEMENT
3044497 Ver 1 1/29/92 16:22
SECTION 6: That all ordinances, resolutions and
orders, or parts thereof, in conflict herewith, are to the extent
of such conflict hereby superseded.
SECTION 7: That this Ordinance shall be in full
force and effect immediately upon passage, approval and
publication.
VOTE: AYES
NAYS
ABSENT
PASSED this _ day of 1992.
APPROVED this day of , 1992.
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
-4-
Its PRESIDENT
WHEREAS, the Project Use Agreement sets forth detailed
provisions and requirements regarding the collection and delivery
of the waste of the Municipality, the various payment obligations
of the Municipality and the methods of making such payments, and
certain covenants, duties and agreements of the Municipality; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality is obligated under the
Project Use Agreement to pay its respective share of the costs of
the Project without set-off or counterclaim, irrespective of
whether the Project is ever completed, made available or provided
to the Municipality and notwithstanding any suspension, inter-
ruption, interference, reduction or curtailment of the Project;
and
WHEREAS, the Project Use Agreement will not go into
effect until it has been executed by the minimum number of
Members provided by Section 13.4 of the Project Use Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers as follows:
SECTION 1: That the Municipality approves the form
of the Project Use Agreement presented to it at this meeting and
the President and Village Clerk are hereby authorized and
directed to execute the Project Use Agreement, in substantially
the form attached to this. Ordinance as Exhibit I and made a part
of this Ordinance, with such changes therein as shall be approved
by the persons executing such agreement.
SECTION '2: That this Ordinance shall constitute an
appropriat'lon —of the funds necessary to meet the Municipality's
obligations to make various payments under the terms of the
Project Use Agreement.
SECTION 3: That the Village Clerk shall publish a
full, true ancT —complete copy of this Ordinance in pamphlet form,
by authority of the President and Board of Trustees.
SECTION 4: That the Village Clerk is authorized and
directed to send—the following to the Executive Director of the
Agency: (1) two certified copies of this Ordinance, (2) two
certificates of publication of this Ordinance evidencing
publication of this Ordinance, and (3) two certified copies of
the minutes, or extract thereof, of the meeting at which this
Ordinance was adopted, showing the adoption of this Ordinance.
SECTION 5: That the President the Village Clerk, and
other officers or employees of the Municipality are authorized
and directed to take whatever additional steps are necessary for
the Municipality to enter into the Project Use Agreement.
-3-
equipment for the Project, to construct and operate the Project,
and to do all other things necessary or desirable to acquire,
construct, operate, equip and improve the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Agency has heretofore issued it Contract
Revenue Notes, Series 1990, on May 1, 1990 (the "Prior Notes"),
to prepare for the acquisition, construction, equipping and
improvement of the Project, and has entered into separate
agreements with each of the Members, each dated as of April 16,
1990 (the "Prior Interim Agreements"), in order to provide for
the payment of principal of and interest on the Prior Notes; and
WHEREAS, the Agency will now borrow additional funds by
issuing one or more series of its contract revenue bonds (the
"Bonds") to finance the costs of planning and constructing the
Project, to purchase or pay the Prior Notes, to pay certain costs
of issuance, to provide for capitalized interest and to establish
appropriate reserves; and
WHEREAS, principal of, premium, if any, and interest on
each series of Bonds will be payable solely from (1) revenues
received by the Agency from any Members or customers (including,
without limitation, from any Project Use Agreement as defined
below); (2) revenues of the Agency derived from the operation of
the Project; (3) any amounts on hand at any time in any funds or
accounts held by the Agency or a fiduciary that are established
in the master bond resolution of the Agency (the "Bond Resolu-
tion") or any supplemental resolution of the Agency authorizing
the issuance of a series of Bonds (a "Supplemental Resolution"),
(4) bond proceeds, (5) such other receipts of the Agency as are
permitted by the Agency Agreement, and (6) investment earnings on
the foregoing; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the best interests of
the Municipality to enter into a project use agreement (the
"Project Use Agreement") with the Agency (a) in order for the
Municipality to participate in and make use of the Project as a
means of processing, storing and disposing of its municipal solid
waste and (b) so that the Agency may pay the costs of the Pro-
ject; and
WHEREAS, under the Project Use Agreement, the Munici-
pality will agree that it will be liable to pay amounts to the
Agency which will be sufficient, when combined with the payments
of the other members that are parties to Project Use Agreements,
to cover the costs of the Project; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality is obligated under the
Project Use Agreement to establish a solid waste disposal system,
and pledge certain revenues from the operation of such system,
all as provided in the Project Use Agreement; and
-2-
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A PROJECT USE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois (the "Municipality"), desires to provide an efficient
and environmentally sound system for the collection,
transportation, transfer, processing, storage, disposal, recovery
and reuse of municipal solid waste, and has determined that
providing such a system is in the best interests of the public
health, safety and welfare of the Municipality and its
inhabitants; and
WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Constitu-
tion of the State of Illinois authorizes units of local govern-
ment to contract and associate among themselves to obtain or
share services and to exercise, combine, or transfer any power or
function, in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and
WHEREAS, under that Constitutional provision, units of
local government may use their credit, revenues, and other
resources to pay costs and the service debt related to inter-
governmental activities; and
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, as
amended, found at Ill. Rev. Stat. ch. 127, paragraph 741 et seq '
(the "Act") also authorl'zes units of loca: government to exercise
and enjoy jointly their powers, privileges or authority and to
enter into intergovernmental agreements for that purpose; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Act, the
Municipality, together with other member units of local govern-
ment (the "Members"), has previously entered into An Agreement
Establishing the Solid Waste Agency of Northern. Cook County as a
Municipal Joint Action Agency (the "Agency Agreement"), and has
become a member of the.Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County
(the "Agency"), in order to provide and operate an efficient and
environmentally sound municipal solid waste system; and
WHEREAS, to develop this solid.waste system, the Agency
has initiated steps to acquire, construct, operate, equip and
improve a municipal solid waste project (the "Project") consist-
ing of certain construction components and financing components,
and toward such end the Agency has contracted for the preparation
of detailed design and engineering plans for the Project, has
acquired sites and options and other rights with respect to sites
for the Project and has obtained certain zoning, land use and
environmental permits; and the Agency now intends to obtain other
necessary governmental permits, to acquire additional sites- or
interests in sites for the Project or to acquire options
therefor, to complete the design of the Project, to acquire
I
il-k-, Awl', 'ii; �' e
Management Consultants
Focused experience
for measurable results
Manufacturing and
Management Consulting at KPMG Peat Marwick is dedicated to
Technology Industries
bringing you superior services in focused markets.
Financial Institutions
Health Care
Government Services
In each market, we apply our experience and knowledge to delivering
Insurance
solutions to your business problems. As seasoned professionals, we
Real Estate and Hospitality
understand the needs of executive management.
Airports
Retail and Wholesale
Drawing on our firm's global capabilities and resources, we address
Energy and Utilities
issues of any size or degree of complexity, helping to keep your
Corporate Transactions
organization on the critical path to success in the 21 st century.
Technology and Operations
Compensation and Benefits
We take pride in the reputation we have earned for delivering business
solutions with measurable results.
Notes And Assumptions (continued)
RUMeat Marwick
15. The average annual increase of the Consumer Price Index for the
preceding five years was used by SWANCC as an estimate of future
cost escalation;
16. The projected solid waste disposal costs assume the ability of
SWANCC to obtain appropriate permits on a timely basis; and
17. The accompanying projections have been prepared on the basis of
information and assumptions set forth above. These projections are
based on the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County's
assumptions concerning future events and circumstances. Moreover,
the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County believes these
assumptions are significant to the projections and are key factors on
which the results depend. The achievement of any financial projection
may be affected by fluctuating economic conditions and is dependent
upon the occurrence of future events which cannot be assured.
Therefore, actual results may vary from the projections and such
variations could be material.
35.
Notes And Assumptions (continued)
eat Marwick
S. Int 'erest Earnings and Reserves Released to SWANCC were provided
by tCo. Incorporated. Interest earnings based on
projected i developed by John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated.
10. Operation & Maintenance costs for the Transfer Stations were
developed by SWANCC and Patrick Engineering, Inc.
1. Tonnage was developed by SWANCC and Patrick Engineering, Inc.
1994 transfer tonnage and a portion of 1995 transfer tonnage will be
11996 all transfer tonnage will be
sent to thef flefill. s
12. Calculated as total "fixed" and operation & maintenance costs divided
by total transfer tonnage.
13. The model was developed by John Nuveen & Co., Inc., and the results
utilized data provided by SWANCC, Patrick Engineering, Inc., and John
Nuveen & Co., Inc.,
14. The recalculation and analysis of the model is based on the adoption
and execution of the draft Project Use Agreement by SWANCC and its
Members;
34.
Notes And Assumptions (continued)
eat Marwick
4. Working Capital Fund deposits are to provide partial funding of debt
service coverage (minimum coverage requirements are 1.1 times
maximum annual debt service). The primary funding is by bond proceeds
and an accumulation of earnings on reserve funds. Information provided by
SWANCC and John Nuveen & Co. Incorporated.
5. General Administration costs were provided by SWANCC. The second
year increase is SWANCC's estimate of the costs to maintain to their own
separate facilities.
6. Insurance cost estimate was provided by SWANCC and prepared by
Patrick Engineering Inc. in its Preliminary Summary Cost Estimate
Transfer Station dated October 11, 1991.
7. Operation & Maintenance Costs for the Balefill were developed by
SWANCC and Patrick Engineering, Inc.
8. The balefill surcharges are based on per ton charges as follows: State of
Illinois Solid Waste Management Fund, $0.95;. Cook County Solid Waste
Management Fund, $1.27; and Department of Conservation, $0.50.
33.
DRAT "meat Marwick
Notes And Assumptions To Schedule Of Balefill Costs
And Tipping Fee
The tipping fee recalculation is based on the following notes:
1. Debt service requirements are based on data from SWANCC and construction
estimates developed by Patrick Engineering Inc. Amounts are from the debt
service schedule which assumes $68,259,626.04 for Contract Revenue
Bonds, 1993 Series A, at an interest rate of 6.908%, provided by John Nuveen
& Co. Incorporated.
2. The estimated requirements for the Equipment Replacement Fund were
developed by Patrick Engineering, Inc. and SWANCC. The funds are to
provide for replacement of equipment that SWANCC will purchase • the
balefill and transfer stations. Original equipment is to be purchased from bon
proceeds. I*
3. The Balefill Conservation Fund requirements were developed by Patrick
Engineering Inc. and presented in their Preliminary Summary Cost Estimate
Transfer Station dated October 11, 1991. The deposits and interest earnings
from the Fund are to be sufficient to accumulate $20,000,000 over the 20 yea
project life. I
32.
D AFf'
Schedule A Results Of Tipping Fee Calculation
NOTES
TRANSFER STATION:
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE COSTS
TRANSFER STATION #1
10
0
0
TRANSFER STATION #2
10
1,473,503
4,488,151
TRANSFER STATION #3
10
0
0
TOTAL O&M TRANSFER STATIONS
1,473,503
4,488,151
TOTAL OPERATION & MAINT. COSTS
$1,668,870
$5,531,904
TOTAL FIXED AND OPERATION
$1,668,870
$5531 904
& MAINTENANCE COSTS
TONNAGE
TRANSFER STATION #1
11
0
0
TRANSFER STATION #2
11
121,152
348,376
TRANSFER STATION #3
11
0
0
TOTAL TRANSFER TONNAGE
121,152
348,376
BALEFILL
11
0
174,188
TOTAL COST PER TON
12
$13.78
$15.88
1,630,175 2,052,416 2,153,931
4,276,003 4,182,596 4,395,391
177
eat Marwick
2,260,42
4,618,889
425_322 3
11.132.540
82,108 99,675 100,900 102,126
302,724 272,582 275,120 277,660
436,751 528,286 532,862 537,446 1
Note: Fiscal Year 1994 does not include the cost of landfill disposal. Fiscal Year 1995 includes one haft the cost of landfill disposal.
31.
DRAFT
Schedule A Results Of Tipping Fee Calculation
eat Marwick
Note: Fiscal Year 1994 does not include the cost of landfill disposal. Fiscal Year 1995 includes one half the cost of landfill disposal. 30.
NOTES
1994
1925
1996
19E
im
1999
FIXED COSTS:
DEBT SERVICE
1
0
0
2,641,241
7,923,723
11,518,723
11,519,820
EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT FUND
2
0
0
0
0
300,000
400,000
BALEFILL CONSERVATION FUND
3
0
0
805,558
911,118
844,456
777,795
WORKING CAPITAL FUND
4
0
0
0
8 500
%529
&553
TOTAL FIXED COSTS
0
0
3,446,799
8843 341
12,671,708
12.706,168
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE:
ADMINISTRATION:
GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
5
127,373
399,267
417,184
435,906
455,468
475,908
INSURANCE ` _
6
90,980
285,190
297,989
311,362
325 334
339,934
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
218,353
684,457
715,173
747,268
780 803
815,842
BALEFILL COST:
OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
7
0
0
4,986,347
6,252,140
6,532,715
6,825,881
IN LIEU OF TAX
7
0
0
27,089
32,507
32,507
3Z507
TOTAL BALEFILL
0
0
5,013,437
6 284M8
6,565,222
6 13W389
GOVERNMENTAL SURCHARGES:
8
0
473,791
1,187,963
1 436938
1,449,385
1461853
TOTAL O & M
218,353
1,158,249
6 916 573
8 468,853
8,795,410
9136 084
LESS - INTEREST EARNINGS
& RESERVE RELEASES
9
(22,987)
(114,4951
0,0113 36611,381,927)
NET O&M
195,366
1,043,754
5903 207
7,086,926
7 409 171
7,745 299
Note: Fiscal Year 1994 does not include the cost of landfill disposal. Fiscal Year 1995 includes one half the cost of landfill disposal. 30.
DRAF]r at Marwick
Contents
Introduction & Overview
2 Landfill Tipping Fee & Community Household Solid Waste Cost Trends
11111111 !!1 gil 11111111g
L—i Results Of SVVAHCC Solid Waste Service Financial Model
29.
49W
eat Marwick
SWANCC offers participating communities the opportunity to
decrease and control the waste transportation distances and costs. As
more landfills close or become restricted, distances to alternative sites
increase.
AVERAGE ROUND TRIP DISTANCES FROM MEMBER COMMUNITIES TO WASTE HANDLING SITES
70.00
60.00
50.00
40.00
Miles
30.00
20.00
10.00
0.00
Distance Distance H 00 To Nearest Nearest N After Nearest
To Tfr. St. Now Nearest After Lake Mallard - Hillside Remaining
SWANCC Landfill Closes Restricts Closes
Source: Distances provided by Patrick Engineering.
Averages computed by selecting the minimum distance from each community to the next aftemative site. 28.
�avNr) _fV 10
1 Introduction & Overview
2 Landfill Tipping Fee & Community Household Solid Waste Cost Trends
EComparison Of Mauling distances To Alternative Landfill Sites
4 Results Of SWANCC Solid Waste Service Financial Model
eat Warwick
27.
eat Marwick
Most member communities experienced increases in their solid waste
costs between 1989 and 1991. For communities with 1989 and 1991
data, the average community household refuse costs increased at a
rate of 6.35% since 1989.
RATE OF CHANGE OF MONTHLY HOUSEHOLD COSTS FOR 1989-1991
10.00%
9.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
-2.00%
-4.00%
-9.00%
' F C7 S Y Y C� a 5 is z a[
W O
a =° a IX
Source: 10191 KPMG survey
Note: Communities with no bar graph did not have readily available comparisons of their household refuse costs. 26.
DRAFT MWeat Marwick
Adding the cast Of recycling increased the average to $12.26 per
household,
1991 MONTHLY PER HOUSEHOLD PICK UP, DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING COST
$22.00
$20.00
$19.00
$19.00
$14.00
$12.00
$10.00
$9.00
$9.00
$4.00
$2.00
$0.00
a L; 1 Q 1 1 1 1 a I I p>p 11" V p 0�• 0 _ F° a
=CL
cpE
d
25.
WMW
eat Marwick
The 1991 monthly per household costs for member communities
averaged $10.78 and varied depending on the level of service
$22.00
$20.00
$19.00
$,9.00
$14.00
$12.00
$10.00
59.00
$9.00
$4.00
$2.00
$0.00
o s 1 ZIT
P g
8 Y > t7 N C7
.t i a ag �R
24.
eat Marwick
Most of the member communities have private contractors pick up
their residential household waste. 5 of the members use public
works crews for collection
ovate Contracted Collection
Public Works Crewsoilection
Arlington Heights
Evanston
Barrington
Glencoe
Buffalo Grove
Rolling Meadows
Des Plaines
Skokie
Hoffman Estates
Winnetka
Kenilworth
Lincolnwood
Private Licensed Collection
Morton Grove
Elk Grove Village
Mount Prospect
Glenview
Niles
Inverness
Northfield
Northbrook
Park Ridge
Palatine
Wilmette
Prospect Heights
South Barrington
Wheeling
23.
"meat Marwick
In the second survey, KPMG Peat Marwick contacted the twenty six
member municipalities to determine solid waste management trends
at the municipal level
The members contacted were :
Barrington
Des Plaines
Evanston
Glenview
Inverness
Lincolnwood
Mount Prospect
Northbrook
Palatine
Prospect Heights
Skokie
Wheeling
Winnetka
The.communities range in population from 2,400 to 75,000 and employed
varying methods for pick-up and disposal and offered residents a variety of
levels of service.
22.
eat Marwick
Numerical representation of trends based on historical rates of change
and reported date of closure
Waste Management
Projected
Projected
Projected
Projected Projected Projected Projected
Projected
LScliiiies
I=
1993
1994
188
im
nu
188$
1989
CID #2
$30.65
$34.62
$39.09
$44.15
$49.86
$56.31
$63.59
Hillside -Sexton #2
$29.00
$32.55
$36.53
$40.99
Lake Landfill
$27.66
SWANCC Baleful
$37.74
$49.25
$57.58
$58.77
Greene Valley
$27.56
$31.95
$37.05
$42.96
$49.82
$57.76
$66.98
$77.66
Mallard Lake
$25.89
$29.66
$33.98
$38.93
$44.60
$51.09
$58.53
$67.06
Settlers Hill
$27.56
$31.95
$37.05
$42.96
$49.62
$57.76
$66.98
$77.66
Woodland
$30.46
$35.18
$40.65
$46.96
$54.24
$62.66
$72.39
$83.63
ARF Grayslake
$30.30
$33.67
$37.41
$41.57
$46.19
$51.33
$57.03
Winthrop Harbor #2
$26.49
Beecher Dvip.
$24.50
Average
128.01
122.8
same
142,08
547.47
S55.17
Ifi=
Note: Landfill tipping fee forecasts do not reflect known contracted tipping fees nor do they include an estimate of transportation costs. For the
short-term, tipping gate fees appear less expensive than the 1994 transfer station SWANCC fees but the closure of three key landfills in
1992 will redirect the demand for disposal capacity to the existing capacity supply provided by fewer sites. Short term projections 21.
assume no price increase for those three facilities which notified TEPA of their closure in 1992.
"Weat Marwick
Based on historical trends, future tipping fees are expected to rise and
communities who remain independent of SWANCC can
expect to pay the market price
AVERAGE PROJECTED TIPPING FEES BASED ON '87 -'91 RATES OF CHANGE PER LANDFILL
1992
0 SWANCC SaWfill & Tranaf*r Station Fast
1992 - 1999 Projection Of Tipping Foos Per Ton (Basad
On'87-*91 Trends)
Note: Landfill tipping fee forecasts do not reflect known contracted tipping tees nor do they include an estimate of transportation costs. For the
short-term, tipping gate fees appear less expensive than the 1994 transfer station SWANCC fees but the closure of three key landfills in
1992 will redirect the demand for disposal capacity to the existing capacity supply provided by fewer sites. Short term projections
assume no price increase for those three facilities which notified IEPA of their closure in 1992. 20.
O
eat marwick
We developed our tipping fee projections based on the 4 year
period of 1987 to 1991 with the smallest average yearly change of
11.25%. We then used the average change for each landfill during
those 4 years to project future rates.
1986 - 1991 HISTORICAL TIPPING FEE RATES OF CHANGE AVERAGE AMONG SELECT SITES
Rate of Change 8
Average Yearly Average Yearly
Average Yearly
Average Yearly
Projection Sheet
Elate 85-91
Hate 88-91
80-6 7-9i
jute 88-91
CID #2
22.70%
17.08%
12.93%
13.37%
Hillside -Sexton #2
22.71%
14.09%
12.22%
16.30%
Lake Landfill
17.10%
5.01010
2.81%
-0.72%
Greene Valley
27.91%
20.60%
15.95%
21.27%
Mallard Lake
25.44%
20.05%
14.56%
19.42%
Settler's Hill
21.76%
18.35%
15.95%
21.27%
Woodland
15.52%
15.52%
15.52%
20.70%
ARF Grayslake
11.98%
11.98%
11.11%
5.63%
Winthrop Harbor #2
22.64010
15.45%
10.08%
11.04%
Beecher Dvlp.
8.00%
8.00%
8.00%
10.67%
Wheatland Prairie
4.61%
4.61%
4.61%
6.14%
Average
18.228
13.70%
11.25%
13.19%
Source: 10/91 KPMG survey and 1190 Eldredge Engineering survey 19.
eat Marwick
The rates of change in landfill prices have varied widely from year
to year reflecting market conditions, changes in ownership and the
imposition of new fees
1986 - 1991 HISTORICAL TIPPING FEE RATES OF CHANGE AVERAGE AMONG SELECT SITES
Source: 10/91 KPMG survey and 1/90 Eldredge Engineering survey 18.
Yearly Rate Of
Yearly Rate Of
Yearly Rate Of
Yearly Rate Of
Yearly Rate Of
Yearly Rate
Rate of Change 8
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Change
Projection Sheet
1966
igt37
1988
i989
1990
1991
CID #2
50.78%
33.68%
11.630/6
13.89%
6.100/6
20.11%
Hillside -Sexton #2
65.860/6
21.54%
0.00%
19.69%
21.05%
8.150/0
Lake Landfill
77.58%
13.80%
13.40%
-12.27%
5.18%
4.93%
Greene Valley
64.4411/6
39.19%
0.000/0
27.18%
23.66'/0
12.96%
Mallard Lake
52.38%
42.00%
0.000/0
27.18%
23.660/6
7.41%
Settler's Hill
38.79%
27.95%
0.00%
27.18%
23.66%
12.96%
Woodland
0.000/0
36.75%
10.00%
15.34%
ARF Grayslake
15.47%
27.56%
6.18%
5.50%
5.21%
Winthrop Harbor #2
58.590/9
36.95%
7.19%
12.08%
10.18%
10.87%
Beecher Dvlp.
0.00%
12.43%
13.51%
6.06%
Wheatland Prairie
0.000/0
18.42%
0.000/0
0.000/0
Average
58,35%
28&2
5,44%
17.16%
12.96%
9.46%
Source: 10/91 KPMG survey and 1/90 Eldredge Engineering survey 18.
DRAFT
Gate tipping fees (continued)
1985 - 1991 HISTORICAL TIPPING FEE PER TON AMONG SELECT SITES
eat Marwick
Source: 10/91 KPMG survey and 1/90 Eldredge Engineering survey 17.
Note: 1986 tipping fees are an interpolation of 1985 and 1987 tipping fees for compacted waste. 1986 survey data is not available.
Eldredge/ Cad. Calculated
Eldredge/ Calc.
Eldredge/ Calc. Eldredge/ Cafc. Eldredge/ Calc,
KPMG Srvy Cal
$/ton
$/ton
$/ton Dec. 87
$/ton
$lion
$/ton
Mon Oct. 1991
Waste Management
Com ed
Compacted
Compacted
Compacted
Co ed
Compacted
Compacted
.. _
1991
CID #2
$8.31
$12.53
$16.75
$18.70
$21.30
$22.60
$27.14
Hillside -Sexton #2
$8.18
$13.57
$16.49
$16.49
$19.74
$23.90
$25.84
Lake Landfill
$12.47
$22.14
$25.19
$28.57
$25.06
$26.36
$27.66
SWANCC Balef ill
Winnetka Muni.
Greene Valley
$5.84
$9.61
$13.38
$13.38
$17.01
$21.04
$23.77
Mallard Lake
$6.18
$9.42
$13.38
$13.38
$17.01
$21.04
$22.60
Environtech Inc.
$19.35
11. Waste Systems
$13.64
K Ili H Disposal
$15.58
Settler's Hill
$7.53
$10.45
$13.38
$13.38
$17.01
$21.04
$23.77
Woodland
$15.19
$15.19
$20.78
$22.86
$26.36
ARF Grayslake
$15.71
$18.14
$23.14
$24.57
$25.92
$27.27
Winthrop Harbor #2
$8.31
$13.18
$18.05
$19.35
$21.69
$23.90
$26.49
Beecher Dvlp.
$18.10
$18.10
$20.35
$23.10
$24.50
Wheatland Prairie
$19.00
$19.00
$22.50
$22.50
$22.50
Average
5$.12
$13.33
517.01
520.64
;23.11
Source: 10/91 KPMG survey and 1/90 Eldredge Engineering survey 17.
Note: 1986 tipping fees are an interpolation of 1985 and 1987 tipping fees for compacted waste. 1986 survey data is not available.
eat Marwick
Gate tipping fees have historically risen for landfills in Northeastern
Illinois; sometimes changing price more than once a year
1985 - 1991 HISTORICAL TIPPING FEE PER TON AVERAGE AMONG SELECT SITES
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$0.00
1991
Source: 10/91 KPMG survey and 1/90 Eldredge Engineering survey
16.
eat Marwick
In October, 1991 landfill tipping fees charged at the gate ranged from
$23 to $28 per ton* for compacted waste. Prices have risen since -
January, 1991 for certain landfills. The average fee in October was
$23.32 per ton.
1991 TIPPING FEE SURVEY RESULTS FOR SURVEY SAMPLE
$30.00
$25.00
$20.00
$15.00
$10.00
$5.00
$0.00
�p �►'CL$,
#�2 e •e 3 LL
s � �
KPMG Peat Marwick Survey 10181 M Eldredge Engineering Survey 1191
Note: KPMG Peat Marwick converted prices quoted in cubic yards to prices quoted in tons by using a conversion rate of 770 cu. yds, per ton. 1
The conversion rate was provided by SWANCC and is consistent with published waste densities for compacted waste.
eat Marwick
The 15 landfill respondents generally represent large capacity
facilities; 7 of which have notified the IEPA of their closure
within 5 years or by 1996. IEPA reports that for the Chicago
metropolitan area, capacity will be exhausted by 1997-1999 at current
disposal rates and no additional capacity.
WASTE MANAGEMENT.FACILITY PROJECTED LIFE AND CAPACITY
•-v-.— ..f....... - wanavwe umpuzidi k apacay ror Jotic waste in Illinois, October 1991, pp. 32 6
Appendix B. Tons per year are calculated by KPMG Peat Marwick using a 770 cubic yard per ton conversion factor. 14.
SWANCC Data From Patrick Engineering.
Years
Years
Capacity
Rate Of Use
Capacity
Rate Of Use
Reported
Remaining
Remaining
Remaining
41111990 To
Remaining
4/1/90
Waste Management
Closure
From 4/91
From 4/91
From 4/91
313111991
From 4191
To 3/31/1991
Facilities
fir
Calculated
Re Dried
TonsiYear
Tons/Year
Cu. Yds.
Cu. Yds. Per Yr.
CID #2
1998
6
6
3,697,434
606,768
9,603,725
1,576,021
Hillside -Sexton #2
1995
2
3
1,662,854
1,018,102
4,319,102
2,644,422
Lake Landfill
1992
1
10
1,291,608
1,634,670
3,354,827
4,245,895
SWANCC Baleflll
2016
20
20
11,533,480
576,674
15,360,000
768,000
Wlnnetka Muni.
1995
5
5
64,292
13,469
166,991
34,984
Greene Valley
2012
18
20
15,890,775
904,542
41,274,740
2,349,460
Mallard Lake
2007
7
14
9,929,689
1,492,758
25,791,399
3,877,293
Envlrontech Inc.
Not reported
5
5
1,438,987
288,761
3,737,629
750,029
11. Waste Systems
1997
9
6
936,540
101,739
2,432,571
264,257
K III H Disposal
1995
2
3
482,371
257,361
1,252,911
668,470
Settler's Hill
2002
11
11
7,532,237
682,988
19,564,252
1,773,996
Woodland
2001
10
10
4,335,286
429,599
11,260,484
1,115,841
ARF Grayslake
1998
5
5
1,701,346
320,168
4,419,080
831,606
Winthrop Harbor N2
1992
1
1
339,375
486,940
881,493
1,264,780
Beecher Dvlp.
1992
5
5
2,006,620
401,780
5,212,000
1,043,585
Wheatland Prairie
2016
0
25
4,016,397
0
10,432,199
0
Cn..rnnn• Ilii.... in CnA A..f:..:.. �f..J fl�f.. !1f l+1...... a .f�rf. a. _•. _._. .�.
_ _ _
•-v-.— ..f....... - wanavwe umpuzidi k apacay ror Jotic waste in Illinois, October 1991, pp. 32 6
Appendix B. Tons per year are calculated by KPMG Peat Marwick using a 770 cubic yard per ton conversion factor. 14.
SWANCC Data From Patrick Engineering.
4Meat Marwick
Our landfill survey revealed that unrestricted disposal capacity
within the service area is becoming more limited
3 publicly owned sites sites including Greene Valley, Mallard Lake and
Settler's Hill in DuPage and Kane County may become restricted to
out -of -county waste if they decide to give communities within their own
borders priority for capacity, or charge differential and higher rates.
They are currently conducting their own analysis of their -County needs.
Wisconsin landfills will also become restricted to waste from Illinois
communities who do not have a recycling program which meets
existing Wisconsin statutory requirements.
Winnetka Municipal restricts solid waste disposal solely for its own
use.
m Wheatland Prairie is temporarily closed.
13.
plottedWe •solid
thosefor i -
eat Marwick
CID # 2, Cook County, IL
Hillside -Sexton #2, Cook County, IL
Lake Landfill, Cook County, IL
SWANCC Balefili, Cook County, IL
Winnetka, Cook County, IL (Restricted to private use)
Greene Valley Landfill, DuPage County, IL
Mallard Lake, DuPage County, IL
Environtech, Grundy County, IL
Illinois Waste Systems, Iroquois County, IL
K & H Disposal, Iroquois, IL
Settler's Hill, Kane County, IL
Woodland 1 & 2, Kane County, IL
ARF Landfill Corp. Grayslake, Lake County, IL
Winthrop Harbor #2, Lake County, IL
Beecher Development, Will County, IL
Wheatland Prairie, Will County, IL (Temporarily Closed)
Pheasant Run, Kenosha, WI
aria
1YY3
19914
ONNOM
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
a an
0 ®
an
OWN
n an
=goals
WEI
m M
an a
Mal
avow
Mal
I
=
. 31001M.—
NO
-
Now—
n all
an
M a
a M
W
a W
m a
Length of time facility may Length of tlme facility not
Key become restricted restricted
i m• mum M anew -
12.
eat Marwick
Cour sample included public and private landfills recently used by
SWANCC members and other adjacent large capacity landfills
which represent typical facilities in Northeastern Illinois
WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITY OWNERSHIP AND OPERATOR BY COUNTY
Waste Management
Ownership
Facilities
Countv
Nuftinifty
Qm=EjhIg
Operator
CID #2
Cook
WMI
Private
WMI
Hillside -Sexton #2
Cook
Hillside
Sexton & BFI
Private
Sexton
Lake Landfill
Cook
Northbrook
WMI
Private
WMI
SWANCC Balef111
Cook
SWANCC
Public
NA
Winnetka Muni.
Cook
Winnetka
Winnetka
Public
Winnetka
Greene Valley
DuPage
Naperville
DuPage County
Public
WMI
Mallard Lake
DuPage
Hanover Park
DuPage County
Public
BFI
Environtech Inc.
Grundy
Morris
Private
Private
Private
11. Waste Systems
Iroquois
Danville
Private
Private
Private
K & H Disposal
Iroquois
Watseka
Private
Private
Private
Settler's Hili
Kane
Batavia
Kane County
Public
WMI
Woodland
Kane
South Elgin
Private
Private
WMI
ARF Grayslake
Lake
Grayslake
U.S. Waste Systems
Private
Private
Winthrop Harbor #2
Lake
Zion
BFI
Private
BFI
Beecher Dvip.
Will
Zion
Sexton & WMI
Private
Sexton
Wheatland Prairie
Will
Plainfield
WMI
Private
WMI
Source: SWANCC member waste disposal destination in 1989 as reported by Patrick Engineering
11.
OPAW
eat Marwick
MG Peat Marwick developed a survey for area landfills and
the twenty six SWANCC municipalities and collected additional
information from governmental statewide solid waste reports and
private engineering studies.
Specifically we:
• Contacted fifteen private and public landfills which have historically
been used by SWANCC communities and other adjacent large
capacity landfills to represent typical facilities in Northeastern Illinois;
• Contacted the twenty six municipalities which are SWANCC members;
. Reviewed Illinois EPA, University of Illinois, Patrick Engineering and
Eldredge Engineering reports on solid waste projects and trends; and
. Conducted a site visit of the proposed Balefill site and area waste
transfer stations.
10.
48IMeat Marwick
There are three objectives to the comparative analysis of solid waste
disposal options
Identify the major opportunities which SWANCC offers to participatin
communities and the major risks facing northern Cook County
communities if they choose to remain independent; i
Identify historical and forecasted solid waste disposal capacity and
cost trends of area landfills through surveys and other information
sources; and
Identify historical and forecasted solid waste disposal plans and cost
trends for the twenty six SWANCC communities through surveys and
other information sources.
This portion of the report on the results of the comparative analysis of solid
waste alternatives presents the findings of two surveys conducted by KPMG
Peat Marwick. Our purpose is to present a compilation of recent solid waste
management cost and capacity trends in order to provide SWANCC
participating communities with a basis for comparing their solid waste
management approaches with the proposed SWANCC Balefill and Transfer
Station approach.
a
Introduction & Overview
Landfifl'Tipping-Fee- ilk-Ca-mmun-Ity Household Solid Waste Cost
Trends
4 Results Of SWANCC Solid Waste Service Financial Model
Al.
eat Marwick
The SW CC balefill offers a mechanise to address the major
solid waste management risks facing the members
The major risks facing SWANCC municipalities are:
Availability of disposal capacity will be influenced by the needs of other
communities who also need c apacity. Disposal capacity is becoming
more concentrated among fewer owners with owners of large public
sites considering limiting or charging more for out of county waste
(DuPageCountyaKane#
Communitiesbe subject to #changes
trending upward. Noprivate landfill was willing to share future fees
when we asked for them in the survey.
7.
eat Marwick
In comparison with other likely solid waste disposal alternatives,
the SW CC balefill offers significant opportunities to its members
The major opportunities facing SWANCC municipalities are:
• Assurance of disposal capacity over a long-term period.
. Control of tipping fees and rates over a long-term period.
. Control of solid waste flows within northern Cook County to encourage
waste reduction, reuse and recycling and to extend landfill life.
B
4 -000
HYMWeat Marwick
We independently tested the calculations of the financial model and
conducted primary and secondary research on the solid waste market
in or near the SWANCC service area.
Our review of the SWANCC Pro Forma model of revenues, expenses and
costs per ton (model) shown in part 4 of this report independently confirmed
the computations performed by John Nuveen & Co. Inc. We have not
reviewed the assumptions and sources of information of the model for
reasonableness. These assumptions, and others are further outlined in
part 4.
Our analysis of the fee comparison includes:
. A comparative survey of member solid waste disposal costs and fees.
. A comparative survey of solid waste disposal costs and fees in, near or
serving the SWANCC service area.
. A comparison of existing private sector alternatives to SWANCC`s
proposed balefill site.
• A review of solid waste disposal costs from available municipal
financial reports.
5.
D eat Marwick
Contents
D
Introduction & Overview
..A
i 111111:..
4 Results Of SWANCC Solid Waste Service Financial Model
0
DR eat Marwick
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County Report Letter
The charts and schedules !`t herein f been t!.'t by
SWANCC or prepared tusbased on t t provided. Therewill t•
differences between the projected and actual results because events and
circumstances frequently do not occur as expected, and those differences
might be material. We have not audited the' reported revenue and
expenditure !expressno opinion ` !
February 11, 1992
3.
Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County Report Letter
The information contained in this report is based on our analysis of
information on solid waste costs provided by the Solid Waste Agency of
Northern Cook County (SWANCC). We also utilized information provided by
John Nuveen & Co. Inc. and Patrick Engineering, our field work and other
outside sources of information such as the Illinois EPA that we deemed
reliable. We have not verified the accuracy of third party information. This
report is restricted for your internal use only.
KPMG Peat Marwick completed. recalculation of the estimated costs
associated with providing solid waste disposal services and we performed a
comparative cost analysis of solid waste disposal operations in, near or
serving the SWANCC
The purpose of our recalculation was to document the assumptions and verify
the mathematical accuracy of the model in calculating the resulting cost per
waste ton. However, we report no opinion as to the reasonableness of the
assumptions used in the model.
2.
We have prepared a comparative analysis of the solid waste
alternatives facing SWANCC members
1 Introduction & Overview
Objectives & Approach
Opportunities & Risks Facing SWANCC Members
2 Landfill Tipping Fee & Community Household Solid Waste Cost Trends
Capacity Trends
Tipping Fee Trends
Overall Community Cost Trends
3 Comparison Of Hauling Distances To Alternative Landfill Sites
Average Distance To Current Waste Handling Facilities
Average Distance To Likely Alternative Waste Handling Facilities
4 Results Of SWANCC Solid Waste Service Financial Model
Tipping Fee Recalculation - Schedule A
eat Marwick
1.
This presentation was prepared by
Larry Lott, Principal
Stan Young, Partner
Larry Shaw, Senior Manager
Allen Mullins, Manager
Brian Knowles, Senior Consultant
Government Services Practice 303 East Wacker Drive, Chicago Illinois 312-838-1000
Peat Marwick
Management Consultants
Focused experience
for measurable results
Manufacturing and
Technofr%gVJn0u4rie
Financial Institutions
Health Care
Airports
Retail and Wholesale
Education
Energy and Utilities
Corporate Transactions
Technology and Operations
Compensation and Benefits
COMPAR i VE ATAN Al OF
WASTE MANAGEMENT
OPTIONS
Draft Report
February 1992
TUE 1b; 14 uu1Njf1ut �tM,,,uhourcu rr.A HU. Inc uwly
�3Ka.,f74 1.
r-(" d6,
Soso -Te
I
a�
1 L V
JP
@ ? I.
G3xz x %4 LLy
`SE6T tori -leapt
_______
Seri
wmwwlw
scale pmj*ct Ho.
MOUNT PROSPECT M E�CIC7E£PS t7eslgnar Craftar elle No.
PUBLIC SAFETY FACILITY AWHITECTS sc
SCIF.?/TISTS
Checker Approver Sheet No.
5�G�10
F -IX �711V 37-0989
C i
VIAGG00
CO. 6ENrmRALC0FYTRAC
567 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
February 12, 1992
708.'437-7300
Mr. Naras Statkus
Donohue, Engineers, Architects, & Scientists
1501 Woodfield Road, Suite 200 East
Schaumburg, IL 60173
Re: Waubonsee Community College
B-4 Change in Design
A.J.Maggio Change Request
Dear Naras:
Per the request of Mr. Steve Ejnik and Paul Shullety of your office to
change beam B-4 per sketch SK -10, dated January 13, 1992 we have the
following additional cost.
Composite Products 5,512.00
Allide Rebar 1,203.16
DeGraf Brothers 10,769.00
17,484.16
A.J. Maggio Co. Bond & Liability Insurance 1% 174.85
A.J. Maggio Co. Overhead & Profit 10% 1,765.91
TOTAL 19,424.92
Total add to contract $.19,424.00.
Very truly yours,
A.J. MAGGIO CO.
By
KurtGoudy
ch
cc: Mr. Don Novotney
CHANGE Distribution to:
ORDER OWNER r-1
ARCHITECT ❑
AIA DOCUMENT G701 CONTRACTOR ❑
FIELD ❑
OTHER ❑
PROJECT: Mt. Prospect Public Safety Facility
(name, address) 112 E. Northwest Hwy.
TO (Contractor), Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
A. J. Maggio Co.
567 W. Algonquin Road
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
CHANGE ORDER NUMBER
INITIATION DATE: February 14, 1992
ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: 18259
CONTRACT FOR: General Construction
I CONTRACT DATE: October 7, 1992
You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract:
Revise Beam B-4 according to Sketch SK -10, dated January 13, 1992.
Not valid until signed by both the Owner and Architect.
Signature of the Contractor indicates his agreement herewith, including any adjustment in the Contract
Sum or Contract Time.
The original (Contract Sum) was ...........................
$ 4,673,000.00
Net change by previously authorized Change Orders ...................................
$ -0-
The (Contract Sum) (4@tmmm+eed-M&ximvmr-Gmt) prior to this Change Order was ..........
$ 4,673,000.00
The (Contract Sum) will be (increased) (dear ased)*1urrft'nbed)
by this Change Order .................... -- ........ ......................
$ 19,424.00
The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be
... $ 4,692,424.00
The Contract Time will be E0 (unchanged) by
NO ( -0-) Days.
The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is
Authorized:
SEC Donohue A. J. Maggio Co.
Village of Mt. Prospect
ARCHITECT CONTRACTOR
11;01 rA7 W. h1,qnnqijn
OWNER
Rd-
Address Address
100 53- Emerson St.
Address
Schaumburg, IL 60173 Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
BY
BY
DATEZZII-/qZ DATE
DATE
AIA DOCUMENT G701 - CHANGE ORDER APRIL 1978 EDITION - AIA® - 0 1978
THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 1735 NEW YORK AVE., N -W., WASHINGTON, D,C. 20006
G701 — 1976
February 14, 1992
Village of Mount Prospect
Department of Public Works
1700 W. Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Attn: Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Re: Public Safety Facility
Donohue Project No. 18259.400
Dear Mr. Weeks:
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS
The attached Change Order No. 1 for an add of $19,424.00, dated February 14,
1992, is for additional costs to increase the size of the main beam which
supports the grade level parking deck.
The precast concrete parking deck is a design tui --d s:ructural element which
will be heavier than anticipated. To support the added dead load of the deck
structure, the beam must be made heavier.
We have reviewed the Contractor's itemized cost breakdown, of which a summary
is attached, find the costs to be reasonable, and recommend your approval of
the change order.
With this change order the Original Contract Sim of $4,673,000.00 will be
increased by $19,424.00 to $4,692,424.00.
We would like to add that prompt approval is necessary to maintain the
progress of the projecz.
Very truly yours,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Naras Statkus
Project Manager
NS:pm
enc: As noted
T/L/RC1
0 1501 Wvdfield Road, Suite 200 Eav, Sdwumburg, I&Pwis,60173 11 205605.8" 0 rur 708.605.8914
Printed,. � recycled paper.
TO:
FROM:
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Village Manager
Director Public Works
February 14, 1992
SUBJECT: New Public Safety Building
Change order #1
c: Fire Chief
Police Chief
0
Attached is a recommendation from our consultant, Donohue, for a
change order to the Public safety facility building. This is
Change Order No. 1 and it is to increase the size of the main
beam, which supports the grade level parking deck.
After considerable review between the general contractor and our
consultant, Donohue, it was felt that the heavier beam was re-
quired to support the added dead load of the parking deck. Cost
for this change order is $19,424.
So that construction is not delayed due to the absence of this
heavier beam, I concur with the recommendation of our consulting
engineer, Donohue, to approve this change order as soon as possi-
ble.
HLW/ td
attach.
PSCHGORD.#I/FILES/BUILDING
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: BUSSE DEVELOPMENT CUL DE SAC
LOCATION: 2200 S. BUSSE ROAD
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1992
YES NO,
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: ENGINEER
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ENGINEER
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL: PLANNING &
ZONING
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FIRE PREVENTION
PV
..B.LlC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN FT. SIZE
SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE
STORM SEWER SIZE
ROADWAYS
SIDEWALKS SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS
STREET LIGHTS
PARKWAY TREES
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
WATER MAIN 0
SANITARY SEWER 90'_9", 1701 611
STORM SEWER 1451 - 1211
ROADWAY 928 S. Y.
PARKING LOTS 0 SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING 0
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS 0
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS _ DAY OF 1 19-.
Village of 1Molunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk
FROM: Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE: February 11, 1992
SUBJECT: Busse Development Cul de Sac
2200 S. Busse Road
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this line for inclusion at the next Wage Board Meeting.
J-W/m
W, 71 WTJ ININ
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: SHOWA MARINE
LOCATION: BUSSE ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK
DATE: FEBRUARY 7, 1992
NO
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: ENGINEER
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED* ENGINEER
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL:
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FIRE PREVENTION
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN FT. SIZE
SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE
STORM SEWER FT. SIZE
ROADWAYS
SIDEWALKS _SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS
STREET LIGHTS #
PARKWAY TREES #
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
PRIVATE IMEROVEMENTS APPROVED
WATER MAIN 505 -FT. 1211 SIZE
SANITARY SEWER 160 FT. 611 SIZE
STORM SEWER 743 -FT. 12" ----.SIZE
ROADWAY NZA
PARKING LOTS 2240 SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS,.THIS - DAY OF 1 19-.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Village Manager
Village Clerk
FROM:
Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinato4l` 3
DATE:
February 11, 1992
SUBJECT:
Showa Marine
Busse Road Industrial Park
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance for= for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
J-W/m
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
. .•
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: WAL-MART
LOCATION: 940 EAST RAND ROAD
YES NO
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: .._..,
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL:
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE Y VILLAGE
WATER MAIN 2231 - 8" 90' - 1210
SANITARY SEWER 754' - 10"
STORM SEWER N/A
ROADWAYS N,GA__
SIDEWALKS 4,200 SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS COMPLETE
STREET LIGHTS COVENANT
PARKWAY TREES # 13
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING COMPLETE
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N,
/A
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS_ APPROVED
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
WATER MAIN 60' - 811
SANITARY SEWER 431 - 6"
STORM SEWER '-12" 1801-1511, 1,006'- 8" 6791-21". 311'-2411
& 502, "
ROADWAY NLA. -
PARKING LOTS 20.600 SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING COMPLETE
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS COMPLETE
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF 1 19
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk
FROM: Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering Co,ordinator],�-�
DATE: February 7, 1992
SUBJECT: WAL-Mart
940 E. Rand Road
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this in line, for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
JW/m
CAF/
1/29/92
ORDINANCE NO
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN
PERSONAL PROPERTY
OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate
authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois, it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of
the following vehicle:
One (1) 1977 Pierce/Herdrickson (#517)
Serial No. 76-13086
Hale 1250 GPM Pump
Detroit 6-71 Diesel
500 Gal Tank (new in 1988)
Allison Transmission HT 47D
and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the best interests
of the Village would be served by the sale of the personal property
being the subject of this Ordinance to the highest bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 11-76-
4 of Chapter 24 of the Illinois Revised Statutes, the corporate
authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the
following item of personal property owned by the Village of Mount
Prospect is no longer useful or necessary and the best interests
of the Village will be served by offering for sale the following
vehicle:
One 1976 Pierce/Herdrickson Fire Pumper (#517)
Serial No. 76-13086
This vehicle is inoperable and will be sold
an "AS IS" condition.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk of the Village of Mount
Prospect be and is hereby directed to cause a public notice
advertising for bids for such personal property to be published in
the Mount Prospect Herald, which notices shall be in substantially
the same form at indicated on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereto
made a part hereof.
SECTION THREE: Bids received in response to said Notice shall be
opened in the Office of the Village Manager, 100 South Emerson
Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056, at the hour of 10:00 A.M.
on March 18, 1992.
SECTION FOUR: Within ten (10) days after the successful bid is
accepted, the successful bidder shall tender to the Village of
Mount Prospect the consideration specified in the bid accepted and
upon receipt of such consideration, the Village Manager is hereby
authorized to transfer title of said personal property to the
successful bidder.
SECTION FIVE: In the event the item remains unsold after the above
I"'
Sell 517
Page 2 of 2
date, said item may be disposed of by the Village Manager or'his
designated agent in a manner which is in the best interest of the
Village.
SECTION SIX: This ordinance shall:,be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
SWANNC
Page 5 of 5
H. All amounts collected from rates and charges imposed under
this Section shall be deposited in the Refuse Disposal Fund
and, together with all other amounts deposited in the Refuse
Disposal Fund, shall be separate and apart from all other
monies of the Municipality, except amounts deposited in the
Refuse Disposal Fund may be invested together with other funds
of the Municipality.
SECTION SI?L Effective Date
This Ordinance shall be in full
force and effect from and after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1992.
SWANNC
Page 4 of 5
2. Pay as they become due interest on and principal of any
revenue bonds or other obligations payable from the
revenues of the Municipal Waste System;
3. Provide for all unpaid claims; and
4. Maintain appropriate reserve funds, including reserves
for uncollected charges.
The budget shall estimate the amounts available to pay those
obligations from:
1. Taxes levied and anticipated to be collected pursuant to
law;
2. Other amounts deposited in the Refuse Disposal Fund; and
3. Rates and charges to be imposed on Persons disposing of
System Waste through the Municipal Waste System.
C. The rates and charges imposed for use of the Municipal Waste
System shall be sufficient, after taking into account monies
then on hand in the Municipal Waste System Fund and the
proceeds of taxes levied and to be collected which have been
assigned and pledged to the Municipal Waste System Fund:
1. To pay all operation and maintenance expenses of the
Municipal waste system, including all obligations to the
Agency under the terms of the Project Use Agreement;
2. To pay as they become due interest on and principal of
any revenue bonds or other obligations payable from
revenues of the Municipal Waste System;
3. To provide for all unpaid claims; and
4. To provide adequate reserve funds for the Municipal Waste
System, including reserves for uncollected charges.
D. The rates charged by the Municipality for the Municipal Waste
System shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions
set forth in the Exclusive Franchise License Agreement.
E. The Municipality shall have the responsibility of billing and
collecting all fees in conjunction with the operation of the
Municipal Waste System.
F. The owners and occupants of real estate within the
Municipality served by the Municipal Waste System shall be
jointly and severally liable to pay all rates and charges
imposed by the Municipality pursuant to the provisions of this
Section.
G. The Municipality has established a policy relative to
penalties, delinquent bills and discontinuance of service to
due non-payment as follows:
(To be inserted)
SWANNC
Page 3 of 5
A. No Person shall collect, transport or dispose of System Waste
without first having entered into a contract with
Municipality.
B. Any contract authorized by Municipality for System Waste shall
be in compliance with the Exclusive Franchise License
requirements established by Municipality.
C. Any Person holding an Exclusive Franchise License issued by
the Municipality to collect, transport or dispose of System
Waste shall comply with the following obligations as a
condition of that Exclusive Franchise License:
1. Comply with all the laws, Ordinances, rules and
regulations pertaining to the collection, transportation
and disposal of System Waste as may be enacted from time
to time by any lawful authority, including the State of
Illinois, this Municipality and the Agency.
2. Deliver all System Waste from single family and multi-
family dwelling units to the transfer station designed
by the Agency and the Municipality.
3. Maintain all equipment used to collect, transport and
dispose of System Waste in good repair and working order
and operate it efficiently and effectively.
4. Maintain accurate books and records and make them
available to the Municipality upon demand.
D. The municipality shall, pursuant to the Exclusive Franchise
License Agreement, have the authority to revoke said Exclusive
Franchise License if the terms and conditions of said
Exclusive Franchise License are violated by licensee.
E. Nothing in this Ordinance is intended to impair any license
or franchise issued before the effective date of this
Ordinance to any Person which authorizes the Person to
collect, transport and dispose of municipal waste which
constitutes System Waste to a location other than the transfer
station designated by the Agency and the municipality.
SECTION vE• The Munigigal WgIste System Fund; Imposition of Rates
and Charges._
A. There is hereby created and established a special revenue fund
of the Municipality known as the Refuse Disposal Fund, which
shall be separate and apart from all other funds and accounts
of the Municipality as provided in subsection H of this
Section Five.
B. Before the beginning of each fiscal year, the Director of
Finance shall recommend and the Municipality shall adopt a
budget for the Municipal Waste System. The budget shall
estimate the revenue required to:
1. Pay all operating and maintenance expenses of the
Municipal Waste System, including all obligations to the
Agency under the Project Use Agreement;
SWANNC
Page 2 of 5
Cooperation Act, Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 127 paragraph 743.2 to
provide for the method or methods of collection,
transportation and disposal of municipal waste within its
corporate limits and to provide that the method chosen may be
the exclusive method to be used within the corporate limits;
and
C. The Municipality, acting pursuant to Article VII, Section 10
of the Illinois Constitution and Section 3.2 of the
Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, has entered into an
Intergovernmental agreement with twenty-five .(25) other north
and northwest suburban Cook County municipalities, thereby
creating the Agency to provide an efficient and
environmentally sound municipal waste disposal system; and
D. The Municipality intends to enter into a Project Use Agreement
by which the Agency will acquire, construct, operate, equip
and improve a municipal solid waste project to provide for
the disposal of System Waste of the Municipality and other
members of the Agency; and
E. Under the Project Use Agreement, the Municipality is obligated
to establish a municipal waste disposal system, to cause
System Waste collected within its corporate limits to be
delivered to the Agency and to make certain payments to the
Agency, all as described in the Project Use Agreement; and
F. It is necessary and in the best interests of the Municipality
to provide for the environmentally sound and efficient
collection, transportation and disposal of System Waste by
creating a Municipal Waste System, by providing for the
disposal of System Waste by delivery to the Agency and to
impose the rates and charges provided for herein.
SECTION THREE: RecruirSS1 LJse of Ngnicipal Waste System
A. Except as permitted in subparagraph B of this Section, all
Persons owning or occupying real.estate within the corporate
limits of the Municipality shall dispose of System Waste
through the Municipal Waste System. All System Waste shall
be collected by or on behalf of the Municipality pursuant to
the terms of this ordinance and shall be delivered to a
transfer station as directed by the Agency and the
Municipality or as otherwise agreed to by the Agency and the
Municipality under the Project Use Agreement.
B. Only System Waste collected from single family and/or multi-
family dwelling units as well as waste generated from
municipal buildings and/or in conjunction with providing
municipal services within the corporate boundaries of the
Municipality, excluding recyclable items or yard waste
materials, in the Municipality shall be disposed of through
the Municipal Waste System.
C. No person shall dispose of System Waste through the Municipal
Waste System unless the System Waste complies with all rules
and regulations applicable thereto and established from time
to time by either the Municipality or the Agency.
D. Any Person disposing of System Waste through the Municipal
Waste System shall pay the rates and charges established by
the Municipality under the provisions of Section Five herein.
JJ/CAF
2/13/92
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE CREATING A MUNICIPAL WASTE SYSTEM
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE*. For the purpose of this Ordinance, the following
definitions are established:
AGENCY: The solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County.
MUNICIPAL The waste collection, transportation and disposal
WASTE system of the Village of Mount Prospect operated
SYSTEM: under an exclusive franchise license, pursuant to
a contract for said services authorized by the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect, including all physical assets of the
Municipality used for the collection, transportation
and disposal of System Waste, all amounts on deposit
in the Refuse Disposal Fund and all amounts
collected on account of rates and charges imposed
under this Ordinance.
MUNICIPALITY: Village of Mount Prospect
PERSON: Any natural, individual, firm, trust, estate,
partnership, association, joint stock company, joint
venture, or corporation, or a receiver, trustee,
conservator or other representative appointed by
order of any court.
PROJECT USE The 1992 project use agreement by and between the
AGREEMENT: Municipality and the Agency, as amended from time
to time.
SYSTEM WASTE: A. Garbage and general household waste
B. Bulk items, including sinks, toilets, white
good, tree limbs, roots and tree trunks
C. municipal and 'municipal buildings waste
Construction and demolition waste
discarded by Persons occupying single family and
multi -family dwelling units as well as waste
generated from municipal buildings arwe+IF:�- �--
and/or in
conjunction with providing municipal services within
the corporate boundaries of the Municipality.
System Waste does not include yard waste or
recyclable items.
SECTION ONE: Findings. The Municipality finds as follows:
A. it is necessary for and in the best interest of the
Municipality to regulate and control the collection,
transportation and disposal of municipal waste in the exercise
of its police power in order to protect the heath, safety and
welfare of its residents; and
B. The Municipality is authorized pursuant to Article VII,
Section 6 of the Illinois Constitution, Section 11-19-1 et
sea. of the Illinois Municipal Code, Ill. Rev. Stat. Ch. 24,
paragraph 11-19-1 and Section 3.2 of the Intergovernmental
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
FROM:
RE:
DATE:
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
SWANCC ORDINANCE
FEBRUARY 14, 1992
Pursuant to your direction, and working with the materials supplied
by Mayer, Brown and Platt, I drafted the attached Ordinance
creating a Municipal Waste System.
It is very important that this Ordinance be reviewed by an attorney
familiar with the subject of refuse and SWANCC. since this is a
first reading, there would be time for final revisions prior to
second reading.
It is my understanding the approved Ordinance will have to be
presented to SWANNC at their March 11th meeting.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
caf/
Abandoned Property
Page 2 of 2
Any personal property specified as unsalable for any
reason by the Property Custodian shall be confiscated or
destroyed.
The proceeds of any sale, after deducting the cost of
storage, advertising, and other expenses incident to the
handling and sale of the property, shall be paid by the
Property Custodian to the Village of Mount Prospect
Finance Director who shall deposit said proceeds in the
General Fund of the Village.
D. Exception; Weapons. The preceding provision of this
Section shall not apply to pistols, revolvers, knives,
dirks, slingshots, metallic knuckles, or other deadly or
injurious weapons. All such weapons, except those that
the Chief of Police shall order retained for the use of
the Police Department, shall be presented for the Chief
of Police for destruction within one year after receipt.
E. Perishable Property. If perishable property is seized
or transferred to the possession of the Police
Department, the Property Custodian, upon certifying in
writing the perishable nature of the property to the
Chief of Police, shall, upon the approval of the Chief
of Police, cause the property, if saleable, to be
advertised for sale by posting at three (3) public places
within the Village and shall sell such personal property
at public auction at any time after three (3) days have
elapsed from its seizure or taking possession. Any
personal property deemed to be unsalable or dangerous
shall be disposed of as refuse or in other reasonable
manner as the Chief of Police may direct.
F. Property Held for Evidence. Any property held for
evidence shall be disposed of according to this Section
after the passage of thirty-five ('35) days from the date
when all appeals have been exhausted or sooner upon
written authorization from the State's Attorney or the
Village Attorney."
SECTION TWO:. That all Ordinances or Resolutions, or parts thereof,
which are in conflict with the provisions of this Ordinance are,
to the extent of such conflict, expressly repealed.
SECTION THREE: That this -Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1992.
1/27/92
EH/caf
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VIII OF CHAPTER 4
OF THE VILILA-GE,.CODE 0F.MOUNT RRQSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
,ECTION ONE: That Article VIII entitled "Department of Police" Of
Chapter 4 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by adding thereto Section 4.816 entitled
"Disposition of Abandoned Property"; so that hereinafter said
Article VIII of Chapter 4 shall include the following:
Sec. 4.816. Disposition of Abandoned Property
A. office of Property Custodian Created. This Section
creates the office of Property Custodian for the Mount
Prospect Police Department. The Property custodian may
be an Officer of the Police Department or a civilian.
The Property Custodian shall be appointed by and serve
at the pleasure of the Chief of Police.
B. Duties of Property Custodian. The Property custodian
shall be the custodian of all personal property seized,
taken or otherwise transferred to the possession of the
Police Department. All officers and members of the
Police Department who, in the course of duty, come into
possession of any personal property shall deliver it
promptly to be Property Custodian, unless it is needed
for immediate use as, evidence. if it is needed
immediately as evidence, that fact shall be reported, in
writing, promptly to the Property Custodian. Nothing in
this Section shall require the Property Custodian to take
possession or dispose of any lost or stolen property, if
the possession or disposition of it is otherwise provided
for by this Village Code.
C. Custody and Disposition Of Personal Property. The
Property Custodian shall maintain a complete and accurate
record of all personal property seized or transferred to
the possession of the Police Department. In the case of
property which is not contraband or needed as evidence,
the Property Custodian shall make a reasonable effort to
identify and notify the owner or any other person
entitled to possession, and shall return the property
after the person provides satisfactory proof of ownership
or right to possession. The person claiming a right to
the property shall reimburse the Police Department for
reasonable expenses and costs of the custodianship.
If the identity or location of the owner or other person
entitled to possession has not been ascertained within
sixty (60) days after the Police Department obtains
possession, the Property Custodian shall proceed to
dispose of the personal property. If the property is
saleable, the Property Custodian shall cause to be
published, in the newspaper of general circulation within
the Village, a notice of sale describing the property in
general terms and specifying the Village's intent to sell
it at public auction for cash at the location specified.
The property will, then be sold at public auction in a
manner permitting inspection by the bidders of the
personal property. Property offered, but not sold, at
such auction may be offered and sold at subsequent public
auction without further notice.
If any personal property is deemed to be of use to any
Village Department, the property may be retained for use
of the Department upon approval of the Village Manager.
liq
CAF/
9/10/91
2/6/92
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 43-77 ESTABLISHING
PROCEDURES AND COSTS CONCERNED WITH THE CIRCULATION
OF VARJOUS,BOARD AgENDAE
BE,IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE* That the Village Clerk of the Village of Mount
Prospect, at least twenty-four (24) hours before all meetings of
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect, shall have available for viewing, at the Office of the
Village Clerk, a copy of each agenda for meetings of the Village
Board.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk shall provide complete agendae
for the aforesaid meetings, including minutes and exhibits, to each
of the following persons: The Village President, Village Trustees,
Village Manager, Village Clerk, and each of the administrative
department and/or division heads as well as the local media.
SECTION THREE: That copies of current agendae and minutes to be
approved shall be made available for current public inspection at
the Office of the Village Clerk; and that, in addition, the Village
Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect shall provide members of
Commissions and Boards, duly appointed by the Village Board, and
to members of the general public, at no cost, who desire to obtain
said copies at the Office of the Village Clerk. Further, the
Village Clerk of,the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby authorized
to make charges for mailing to all others desiring agendae for all
meetings of the President and Board,of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect pursuant to the following schedule:
A. $30.00 annually for mailing agendas only
B. $60.00 annually for mailing agendae and minutes
C. $100.00 annually for mailing entire agenda packages
SECTION OUR: That the provisions of SECTION THREE hereinabove
shall not apply to elected Village officials and the Chairmen of
Commissions and Boards for a period of two (2) years after the
termination of their holding office, during which two (2) years the
said officers shall, at their request, receive by mail the entire
agenda packages without cost or charge.
SECTION FIVE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect after its passage and approval in the manner provided by
law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1992.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Mayor
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk L
NOTICE TO BIDDER
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Village of Mount Prospect
will accept bids at the office of the Village Manager,
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
until 10:00 A.M. on March 18, 1992 for the following:
One (1) 1977 Pierce/Herdrickson
Serial No. 76-13086
Hale 1250 GPM Pump
Detroit 6-71 Diesel
500 Gal Tank (new in 1988)
Allison Transmission HT 47D
This vehicle is inoperable and will be sold in an "AS
IS" condition. Appointments for viewing should be made
with Captain Steve Dumovich, 870-5660 during regular
business hours.
The Village of Mount Prospect offers no warranty, express
or implied, on the condition or serviceability of this
equipment. The bidder assumes full responsibility for
the equipment upon taking possession.
The highest qualified bid will be deemed the successful
bidder. The Village reserves the right to reject any and
all bids as well as to waive any technical errors in
individual bids.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk