Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4375_001
Next Ordinance No. 4GCLERK'S OFFICE Next Resolution 2-9 No. z-92 vzLLA E arA 41 A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Meeting Room, let Floor Tuesday Senior Citizen Center January 21, 1992 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER Ii. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilke III. INVOCATION - Trustee Floros IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, January 7, 1992 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD A. PRESENTATION: Recipient of the Holiday Buckle Up Lottery VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. Request to create a Class "S" liquor license for the new Retro Bistro Restaurant to be located at 1744 West Golf Road. ALL VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 76-V-91, 418 South Emerson Street 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 418 S. EMERSON ST. This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a 1.7' side yard setback to accommodate an existing deck. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit A) B. ZBA 77 -SU -91, Wal-Mart - Mount Prospect Plaza 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS WAL-MART AND LOCATED WITHIN THE MOUNT PROSPECT SHOPPING PLAZA This Ordinance grants a Special Use to permit a 5' 10" diameter satellite antenna on the roof of their new store. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the Special Use by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit B) C. ZBA 79-V-91, 2016 East Euclid Avenue 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2016 E. EUCLID AVENUE This ordinance grants the following variations: a 5 foot building setback from the interior lot line; a 15 foot building setback from the rear property line; a zero feet to the front and side and 10 feet from the side lot line; and a variation to allow 78% lot coverage, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting (Exhibit C) this request. D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4274 This ordinance extends the effective period of variations granted to the Mount Prospect Historical Museum, 101 South Maple Street. (Exhibit D) IV. NEW BUSINESS A. A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS This Resolution appropriates funds for the reconstruction of specified roads. (Exhibit E) B. Acknowledge receipt of the audit for the 1990 Motor Fuel Tax Funds conducted by the Illinois Department of Transportation. C. Request by village administration to prohibit parking on the east side of Maple Street between Northwest Highway and Central Road. The Safety commission recommended granting this request. X. VILLAGE XA14AGERIS REPORT A. Request to waive bidding procedure and authorize purchase of water system control panel upgrade from J. X. Process System. B. Request to waive bidding procedure and authorize entering into a contract with Insituform. Midwest, Inc. for sanitary sewer repairs. C. Request to waive bidding procedure and accept the proposal to paint the ceiling at Fire Station 12, 1601 W. Golf Road. D. Status Report XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Personnel xiii. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JANUARY 7, 1992 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:34 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee George Clowes Trustee Leo Floras Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Irvana Wilks INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Clowes. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved APPROVE to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MINUTES Mayor and Board of Trustees held December 17, 1991. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved APPROVE BILLS to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 565,687 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 12,378 Community Development Block Grant Fund 4,627 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 21,812 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 276,300 Parking System Revenue Fund 4,624 Risk Management Fund 138,390 Vehicle Replacement Fund 42,709 Motor Equipment Pool Fund - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep. Fund 10,471 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 268 Fire & Police Building Const. 32,698 Flood Control Revenue Fund 190,348 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - Debt Service Funds" 776,970 Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund 25,879 Police Pension Fund 40,849 Firemen's Pension Fund 46,291 Benefit Trust Fund $2,190,301 Trustee Wilks stated that she would vote to approve the bills with the exception of $757.90 under the Village Manager's budget items. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD 3RD GRADE Dolores Haugh, Executive Director Of the Historical CURRICULUM Also presented for second reading was an Ordinance granting a Special Use to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail uses, as well as a target range and safety and marksmanship training at the subject property, zoned I-1. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0, subject to several conditions. ORD.NO. 4383 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for passage of ordinance No. 4383 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1611 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: Floros Motion carried. AMEND CH. 18 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would SOUTH PINE ST. amend the Traffic Code (Chapter 18) by deleting the prohibition of parking on Sunday for the 200 block of South Pine Street. The Safety Commission recommended granting this request. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 2 - January 7, 1992 Society, along with Ms. Oberley and John Page, presented a newly developed study book for 3rd grade students dealing with the history of the Village. Dolores Haugh stated that this study course was developed in conjunction with the celebration of the 75th Anniversary of the Village as well as the 25th Anniversary of the Mount Prospect Historical Society. KAYORIS REPORT No report. OLD BUSINESS ZBA 74-A-91 ZBA 74-A-91 and ZBA 75 -SU -91, 1611 Algonquin Road ZBA 75 -SU -91 An ordinance was presented for second reading that 1611 ALGONQUIN would amend Chapter 14 (Zoning ordinance) to include archery and firearm shooting as well as target ranges, safety and marksmanship training, along with accessory retail uses as a Special Use in the 1-1 (Light Industrial) District. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. ORD.NO. 4382 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of ordinance No. 4382 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: Floros Motion carried. Also presented for second reading was an Ordinance granting a Special Use to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail uses, as well as a target range and safety and marksmanship training at the subject property, zoned I-1. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0, subject to several conditions. ORD.NO. 4383 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for passage of ordinance No. 4383 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1611 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: Floros Motion carried. AMEND CH. 18 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would SOUTH PINE ST. amend the Traffic Code (Chapter 18) by deleting the prohibition of parking on Sunday for the 200 block of South Pine Street. The Safety Commission recommended granting this request. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 2 - January 7, 1992 Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for ORD.NO. 4384 passage of ordinance No. 4384 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 ,(TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that REFERENDUM would place a referendum question on the March 17th QUESTION: ballot as to whether the users of Citizens Utilities CITIZENS water and sewer would be willing to purchase the UTILITIES system. The proposed purchase would be in WATER/SEWER cooperation with the City of Prospect Heights. it was noted that a motion authorizing the same referendum question to be placed on the ballot for Citizen Utilities users located within the City of Prospect Heights had failed. There was discussion as to whether Mount Prospect would proceed without Prospect Heights, however, it was the consensus of opinion that with additional information the City Council of Prospect Heights may reconsider their vote at a Special meeting on January 9th. Mayor Farley asked the Village Board members if they could attend a Village Board meeting on Saturday morning, January 11th, at 9:45 A.M. to take action on the proposed ordinance. Trustee Hoefert stated that he would be out of town and unable to attend. It was decided that this Board meeting would be adjourned to Saturday, January 11th at 9:45 A.M. for the purpose of continued discussion on this referendum question. Ordinances were presented for second readings DOWNTOWN relative to redevelopment of the downtown REDEVELOPMENT district, specifically that area located between Northwest Highway and Central Road and Pine and Wille Streets. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved ORD.NO. 4385 for passage of ordinance No. 4385 AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE REDEVELOPMENT OF REAL ESTATE WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 3 - January 7, 1992 ORD.NO. 4386 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4386 AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ELIGIBILITY REPORT AND TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None motion carried. ORD.NO. 4387 Trustee Busse, seconded Trustee Wilks, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4387 AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4388 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4388 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE FOR THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS PROPERTY An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would ACQUISITION: authorize the acquisition of property commonly known 100 W.NORTHWEST as 100 West Northwest Highway (referred to as the HIGHWAY Aldi Is Building). The purchase price of this property is $1,350,000.00. It was noted that this property is included in the Triangle Redevelopment Project. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4389 Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4389 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion'carried. Page 4 - January 7, 1992 ZBA 76-V-91, 418 South Emerson Street The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a 1.71 side yard setback to accommodate an existing deck. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next regular meeting of the Village Board on January 21st. ZBA 77 -SU -91, Wal-Mart, Mount Prospect Plaza The Petitioner is requesting a special Use to permit a 51 1011 diameter satellite antenna on the roof of their new building, located within the Mount Prospect Plaza. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next regular meeting of the Village Board on January 21st. ZBA 79-V-91, 2016 East Euclid Avenue The Petitioner requested the following variations: Zero foot building setback from the interior lot line; Ten foot building setback from the rear property line; Parking setback to within zero feet from the front and side lot lines; and 78% lot coverage. It was the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals that the following variations be granted: A five foot (51) building setback from the interior lot line; A fifteen foot (151) building setback from the rear property line; Parking setback to within zero feet from the front lot line and ten feet (101) from the side lot line; and A 78% lot coverage. Page 5 - January 7, 1992 ZBA 76-V-91 418 S. EMERSON ZBA 77 -SU -91 WAL-MART MOUNT PROSPECT ZBA 79-V-91 It was noted that this is a small lot however the variations recommended by the Zoning Board of Appeals would allow the Petitioner to construct a building 4,995 square feet in size and will provide the 20 parking spaces required. The proposed building will be occupied by a video store. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to concur with the recommendations of the Zoning Board of Appeals relative to ZBA 79-V-91. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Page 6 - January 7, 1992 Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented January 21st for first reading. FOREST RIVER A Resolution was presented that would authorize FIRE PROTECTION execution of the annual Agreement with the Forest River DISTRICT Fire Protection District to provide emergency services AGREEMENT of the Fire Department. RES.NO. 1-92 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for passage of Resolution No. 1-91. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks ,Nays: None Motion carried. VILLAGE KANAGERIS REPORT BUDGET An Ordinance was presented for second reading that AMENDMENT would certain amendments to the annual budget adopted for fiscal year commencing May 1, 1991 to April 30, 1992 relative to a change in priorities and/or new projects that have been authorized which affected the budget as adopted. ORD.NO. 4390 Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4390 AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 TO APRIL 30, 1992 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. BUDGET An Ordinance was presented for second reading that AMENDMENT would amend the 1991/1992 budget by separating the refuse disposal revenues and expenditures into a separate fund. Page 6 - January 7, 1992 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ORD.NO. 4391 for passage of Ordinance No. 4391 AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 TO APRIL 30, 1992 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The following bid results were presented for the SELF-CONTAINED purchase of one self contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) fill station: Bidder Amount W. S. Darley $5,300.00 Air One 5,500.00 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved W.S.DARLEY to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low qualified bid submitted by W. S. Darley for the purchase of one self contained breathing apparatus fill station at a cost not to exceed $5,300.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. A request was presented to authorize the issuance ISSUE BONDS, of bonds in the amount of $4,700,000 and to BOND COUNSEL authorize entering into an Agreement with R. V. & FINANCIAL Norene as financial advisors and Kattin, Muchin ADVISORS and Zavis as bond counsel. It was noted that the interest rates are so low at this time that it would be appropriate to move the schedule up by 2"months forward. The funds from the issuance of these bonds would be used for flood control, capital improvements property acquisition. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to authorize administration to proceed with the issuance of bonds in the amount of $4,700,000 and to authorize entering into agreements with R. V. Norene as financial advisor and Katten, Muchin and Zavis as bond counsel. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Village Manager Dixon presented a request for LINCOLN the Village to participate with School District 57, JR. HIGH the Mount Prospect Public Library and the Mount LECTURE Prospect Park District to construct an auditorium/ HALL lecture hall addition at Lincoln Jr. High which would be shared by these agencies. Page 7 - January 7, 1992 It was noted that the proposed addition would seat 230 people and cost approximately $325,000. It was recommended that the shared cost would result in an annual payment of $11,000 of a 7 year period for each agency. Inasmuch as the other agencies had not made final decisions on this project and the fact that additional information was requested, action on this request was deferred. EMPLOYEE A request was presented to authorize developing a Plan BENEFIT document, along with the necessary legal opinion, in PROGRAM order to offer an employee benefit program. The proposed plan would permit employees to 'bank' monies formerly paid to the employees for unused sick leave, which monies would be used after retirement to off- set medical and/or long term health care. The Plan Document developed would be presented to the Village Board for approval. Proposals were requested and the firm of Deloitte & Touche presented the low qualified bid of $6,000 to develop the documents necessary for this program. DELOITTE & Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to TOUCHE accept the proposal submitted by Deloitte & Touche in an amount not to exceed $6,000.00 for the preparation of a Plan Document associated with an employee benefit program. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floras, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. SPIESS Mr. Dixon announced that Spiess Department Store, CLOSING located at Randhrrst Shopping Center, will be closing. TCI Trustee Clowes asked for information relative to a RESPONSE response from the TCI hearings, which was required within 60 days of that hearing. SIGN REVIEW Trustee Clowes also asked that the minutes of the Sign BOARD MINUTES Review Board be forwarded to the Village Board on a more timely basis. VOTING Trustee Clowes stated that since the subject of voting REQUIREMENTS requirements is scheduled to be discussed at the January 14th Committee of the Whole meeting, that the Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals should be asked to attend in order to obtain his input. ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT TO SATURDAY Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting to Saturday, JANUARY 11, 1992 January 11, 1992 at 9:45 A.M. in order to continue discussion on the proposed Ordinance placing a referendum question on the March 17, 1992 ballot. The Board adjourned to a date certain at 9:58 P.M. RECONVENE RECONVENE Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 9:45 A.M. on Saturday, January 11, 1992. Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley Trustee Busse Trustee Clowes Trustee Corcoran Trustee Floros Trustee Wilks Page 8 - January 7, 1992 & January 11, 1992 It was noted that the City of Prospect Heights had held a Special Meeting in order to reconsider their action and did approve a Resolution authorizing a referendum question to be placed on the March 17th ballot relative to the purchase of Citizens Utilities Water Company. Several residents in attendance asked questions as to the proposed purchase price and cost to the individual home owners. Mr. Dixon stated that there would be at least 3 meetings, probably at River Trails Jr. High. Information would also be distributed in the next Village Newsletter. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO. 4392 moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4392 AN ORDINANCE PLACING A QUESTION OF PUBLIC POLICY ON THE BALLOT FOR THE MARCH 17, 1992 ELECTION Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Wilks, Farley Nays: Clowes Motion carried. ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN Mayor Farley declared the meeting adjourned at 10:55 A.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 9 - January 7, 1992 and January 11, 1992 eneral & Special_ Revenue General Fund Refuse Disposal Fund Motor Fuel Tax Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterojisb Funds Water & Sewer Fund Parking System Revenue Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund Vehicle Replacement Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement Fund Downtown Redev Const Funds Police & Fire Building Construction Flood Control Construction Fund Debt Service Funds Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION January 16, 1992 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 1/01/92 through Per Attached Journal Balance 1/01/9 1116192 List of Bills Entry 1116/92 $ 2,082,028 $ 610,621 $ 533,107 <72,000> $ 2,087,542 160,582 20,340 180,922 - 426,490 1,718 27,880 400,328 2,941 5,000 5,892 2,049 < 3,745> 8,221 75,978 72,000 498 3,347,394 145,349 320,774 3,171,969 170,539 6,208 5,953 170,794 1,167,214 17,935 115,451 1,069,698 448,849 88 1,647 447,290 398,161 8,211 10,833 395,539 328;062 1,594 1,571 328,085 6,017,681 11,966 125,878 5,903,769 2,205,014 3,530 234,483 1,974,061 753,445 3,671 80,827 676,289 9,882 4,451 7,320 7,013 1,463,292 16,443 24,964 1,454,771 16,741,943 64,713 - 16,806,656 18,750,303 76,457 - 18,826,760 247.002 183 2.167 245.018 $54.717,077 $1.006.699 $1=755.647 $ $53.968.129 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS ABSOLUTE VENDING SERVICE DOUGLAS ANDERSON ARMCOR DESIGN & BUILD B & A SEWER BEAR CONSTRUCTION THE BELMAR GROUP CFM CONSTRUCTION CHRISTMAS ON THE MALL JOHN CIRONE CITIBANK,N.A. CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT COCA COLA BOTTLING CO. CRESTVIEW VENDING DANLEY LUMBER DAVE DEUTSCH DIMUCCI CONSTRUCTION CO. DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT T. H. DITTMER DO IT RIGHT ROOTER DREW CONSTRUCTION FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS GULDEN-BITTEL SEWER SERV. HOUSEHOLD FINANCIAL HUGHES & SON INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 PURCHASE.DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL 920106 REFUND OVERPMT $60.00 $60.00 RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE $418.00 $418.00 C7024 ARMCOR $75.00 $75.00 C10309 B&A SEWER $100.00 $100.00 C9627 BEAR CONST $500.00 $500.00 C6667 BELMAR GROUP C8207 BELMAR GROUP $445.00 $450.00 $895.00 C10107 CFM CONST $470.00 $470.00 920107 REFUND OVERPMT $75.00 $75.00 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $3.14 $31.28 $34.42 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS -GAB $13 903.93 PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS 638.00 $14,541.93* PMT P/R 1/9 $224.25 $224.25* 920107 REFUND OVERPMT $40.00 $40.40 920107 REFUND OVERPMT $40.00 $40.00 C9288 DANLEY LUMBER $50.00 $50.00 C8149 DEUTSCH $50.00 $50.00 010247 DIMUCCI $75.00 $75.00 PAYROLL PERIOD 12/30/91 $1,708.54 PAYROLL PERIOD 12/30/91 $1,026.47 P/R ENDING 12/31/51 $5,877.32 P/R ENDING 1f 9/ 2 $419,056.08 P/R ENDING 1/09/92 $1,101.47 P/R ENDING 1/09/92 $728.58 PJR ENDING 1/09/92 $39,358.77 $468,857.23* REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $2.38 $.24 $2.62 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL C10298 DO IT RIGHT ROOTER $100.00 $100.00 C8593 DREW CONST $75.00 $75.00 DEC 91 MEDICAL REIMB $7,320.13 $7,320.13*' C8515 GULDEN BITTLE $100.00 $100.00 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $4.32 $42.84 $47.16 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $100.00 1456 HUGHES & SONS 1457 HUGHES & SON $125.00 $225.00 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT IMPERIAL DEVELOPMENT J.R.C. CONSTRUCTION ANDREA JUSZCZYK KIEFFER SIGN CO. RONALD W. KLOSS JEAN KOELLER FRANK J. KOLMAN, LTD. KEITH KORKUS LAKE -COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY LYNEST COMPANY MACKEY BUILDING CORP. MANZELLA PLUMBING MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO. SATURN SIGNS KARL SCHLOSSER G D SEARLE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL EMPLOYEE SHARE DEC 91 $19,063.30 EMPLOYER SHARE DEC 91 $46,344.81 $65,408.11* 1375 IMPERIAL DEVELOPMENT $75.00 $75.00 C7841// JRC%% CONST $75.00 $75.00 $2 54.00 $254.00* R245PMT 22RKIEFFER SIGN DEPOSIT $25.00 1422 KIEFFER SIGN $?5.00 1423 KIEFFER SIGN SERVICE $75.00 $175.00 REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT $4.56 REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT $.44 $5.00 920114 KOELLER $8.00 $8.00 920107 REFUND OVERPMT 10.00 $10.00 C8329 KORKUS REFUND ,75.00 $75.00 NO LEAD GASOLINE $8,430.40 $8,430.40 920107 REFUND OVERPMT $20.00 $20.00 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $2.38 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $.24 $2.62 C8538 MANZELLA PLBG $100.00 $100.00 PPRT 1992 1ST INSTALLMENT $1,519.71 $1,519.71* DUE TO FED DEP 12/31/91 $20.66 DUE TO FED DEP 12f31f93 $14.89 SAVINGS BONDS PR 1/99 $450.00 DUE TO FED DEP PR 1J09 $116.48 DUE TO FED DEP PR 1/09 $10,549.08 DUE TO FED DEP PR 1209 $83.30 DUE TO FED DEP PR 1209 $55.25 DUE TO FED DEP PR 1/09 $2,958.55 DUE TO FED DEP PR 1709 REFUND $1,391.01 $15,639.22* C8536 OLD ORCHARD $100.00 $100.00 POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT $3 000.00 $3;000.00* C10170 AJ ROGERS 100.00 C10266 AJ ROGERS $100.00 C9985 AJ ROGERS $100.00 $300.00 1454 SATURN SIGNS $100.00 $100.00 920114 SCHLOSSER OVERPMT $125.00 $125.00 920107 BUSINESS LIC OVERPMT $662.50 $662.50 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS SUNRISE RESTAURANT THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT TRI -R VENDING SERVICE CO. UNIFIED AIR FREIGHT TRUCKING MELODIE VAN DYKE DOWNEY R. VAREY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1%16/92 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION 1439 SUNRISE REST 920103 BOND MONEY 920107 BOND MONEY 920110 BOND MONEY 920115 TRI R OVERPMT BUSINESS LIC OVERPMT C7012 VAN DYKE REFUND REFUND MTCE GUARANTEE 920103 VEHICLE STICKER RIDGE TRANS TO CAPITAL IMP FUND TR TO POLICE PENSION FUND TR TO ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND C10107 CFM CONST C10247 DIMUCCI C1537 FLUSH SEWER C2775 DOUGHTY C6667 BELMAR GROUP C7012 VAN DYKE MELODIE C7024 ARMCOR C7841 JRC CONST C8149 DEUTSCH C8207 BELMAR GROUP C8329 KORKUS C8593 DREW CONST C8645 MEDCON SPEC C9288 DANLEY LUMBER OVERPAYMENT 91224 ZENITH 1375 IMPERIAL DEV 1422 KIEFFER SIGN 1423 KIEFFER SIGN 1439 SUNRISE REST TR TO GENERAL FUND TR TO GENERAL FUND TR TO GENERAL FUND TR TO GENERAL FUND TR TO POL&FIRE BOND PROCEEDS INVOICE AMOUNT $75.00 $2,518.00 $500.00 $1,290.00 $20.00 $10.00 $65.00 $758.00 $20.00 $24.00 $340.82 $100.27 $30.00 $25.00 $100.00 $100.00 $55.00 $25.00 25.00 $25.00 $50.00 $50.00 $25.00 $25.00 $100.00 $50.00 $150.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25,687.53 $6,656.96 $1,500.00 $40,000.00 $222,250.50 PAGE TOTAL $75.00 $4,308.00- $20.00 $10.00 $65.00 $758.00 $20.00- $24.00 $340.82 $100.27 $935.00 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DOROTHY WADE CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1%16/92 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION TR TO GENERAL FUND TR TO POL&FIRE BLDG B&I TR TO GENERAL FUND TR TO MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND TR TO RISK MANAGEMENT FUND TR TO RISK MANAGEMENT FUND TR TO IMRF FUND TR TO IMRF FUND TR TO IMRF FUND TR TO IMRF FUND RESIDENT RE TR TAX REBATE GENERAL FUND $443,134.38 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,433.37 WATER & SEWER FUND $101,397.63 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $14,541.93 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & I 1991A $80,000.00 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $24,963.67 PAGE 4 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $40,000.00 $85.00 $68-00 $6,656.96 $6.48 $12.00 $125.00* $23,150.00 $49.00* ***TOTAL** $366,448.95 $6450.00 35.23 $248.60 $9,109.60 $159.41 $10,152.84 $311.00 $311.00 ***TOTAL** $974,029.18 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $116.48 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $75,977.85 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $2,893.24 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $222,250.50 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $7,320.13 ******************************************************************************************************** PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION FLOWERS FLOWERS SWEETROLLS 75TH ANN COM MTG 75TH ANNIV AD MISC EXPENSES 30.00 38.00 $68-00 6.48 $6.48 $135.00 $125.00* $49.00 $49.00* ***TOTAL** $248.48 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1%16%92 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $248.48 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT $125.00 $125.00 COMPUTERLAND TRAINING CLASSES $320.00 $320.00 MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM SUPERVISORS TRNG SEMINAR $130.00 $130.00* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $114.95 $25.00 SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. MISC EXPENSES $11.79 $126.74* VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE OFFICE EQUIPMENT ***TOTAL** $701.74 GENERAL FUND $701.74 ******************************************************************************************************** COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION AT&T 016 089 7465 001 $527.61 $527.61 GLORIA BARLETTA DEWOLFE MUSIC LIBRARY COMM ASST BD MTG COMPACT DISCS $25.00 $210.00 $25.00 $210.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE SERVICE $50.00 $2,239.02 $2,289.02 PHYLLIS MOLIERE COMM ASST BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. OFFICE EQUIPMENT $354.00 $130.00 $484.00 OFFICE EQUIPMENT COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $3,560.63 GENERAL FUND $3,560.63 ******************************************************************************************************** VENDOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUTLER PAPER COMPANY I.B.M. CORPORATION ILLINOIS GFOA PITNEY BOWES INC. PRYOR RESOURCES, INC. PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. RCM DATA CORP SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE SYSTEMS FORMS, INC. TRACS U. S. CHAMBER, PUB FULFILLMENT CAROL WIDMER XL/DATACOMP INC. NED V. ZIZZO, INC. FINANCE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE CHIPPER'S RESTAURANT ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGH PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PAPER $595.60 $595.60 JAN MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER $194.00 $26.37 JAN MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER $52.00 $246.00 SEMINAR WIDMER $35.00 $35.00 POSTAGE BY PHONE $209.00 $209.00 REGISTER MCELDERRY $99,00 REGISTER DYON $99.00 $198.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $87.16 $87.16 14AINTENANCE $248.60 $248.60 DELIVERY $18.20 $18.20 4 PART INVOICE FORMS $583.38 $583.38 JANUARY CONNECT FEE $50.00 REGISTRATIONS $125.00 $175.00* EMPLOYEE BENEFITS REPORT $19.95 $19.95 TUITION REIMBURSEMENT $922.00- $922.00 JANUARY MAINTENANCE $13.04 $13.04 MICE CHECK SIGNER $195.00 $195.00 ***TOTAL** $3,545.93 $3,545.93 LUNCHEON FIELDS/LOWE MEMBERSHIP DUES LEGAL NOTICE $9.50 $9.50 $26.37 $26.37 ***TOTAL** $65.87 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $65.87 ******************************************************************************************************** RISK MANAGEMENT BROOKFIELD EXCESS LOS PREM -JANUARY CLAIMS THRU 1/2/92 $8,910.90 $50,018.06 MED MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 1/08 $38,027.97 $96,956.93* CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS. SERVICES DEC LIFE INSURANCE JAN 92 $500.00 $2,096.41 $500.00 $2,096.41* FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE GIERMAN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. RENEW VOL FIRE HLTH POLICY $1,067.30 $1,067.30 $197.00 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C. 9001792374-X SERVICES SCHWANDT $197.00 $60.50 $60.50 NORTHWESTERN MEMORIAL HOME CANNING 1911002 $31.25 $31.25 ***TOTAL** $100,909.39 RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $100,909.39 ******************************************************************************************************** INSPECTION SERVICES AMERICAN SOCIETY CIVIL ENGRS ORGANIZATION MEMBERSHIP $168.00 $59.62 $168.00 BUILDING PERMITS LAW BULLETIN CBULLETIN OMPUTER RENEWAL ALIES $1,$59.62 COMP USA COMPUTER & SUPPLIES $374.90 COMPUTER & SUPPLIES $2,000.00 $3,374.90 HEWLETT PACKARD NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH REPAIR SERVICE MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $354.00 $50.00 $354.00 $50.00 NATIONAL SEMINARS REGISTER BENCIC/WULBECKER $118.00 $32.00 $118.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $17.30 $49.30* SOIL & MATERIAL CONSULTANTS, I 1991 STREET RECON PROGRAM $2,083.00 $2,083.00 VENDOR INSPECTION SERVICES FREDRIC TENNYSON XEROX CORP. XL/DATACOMP INC. INSPECTION SERVICES GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16%92 PURCHASE•DESCRIPTION CLOTHING ALLOWANCE MAINTENANCE CHARGE JANUARY MAINTENANCE $4,380.78 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND INVOICE AMOUNT $53.75 $140.17 $13.04 ***TOTAL** PAGE 8 TOTAL $53.75 $140.17 $13.04 $6,463.78 $2,083.00 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION ASSOCIATED PRINTERS BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BUTLER PAPER COMPANY COMPUTERLAND GALL'S, INC. GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC LUND INDUSTRIES, INC'. LEE AUTO PARTS SERVICE $410.71 $410.71 ABANDONED VEHICLE STICKERS $248.00 $248.00 PARTS $249.32 $249.32 PAPER $527.00 $527.00 2 PRINTER RIBBONS $24.00 $24.00 3 CAR OPENING SETS $66.47 $66.47 FRONT END ALIGNMENT $39.00 FRONT END ALIGNMENT $39.00 $78.00 DISPOSABLE BLANKETS $104.64 $104.64 SERVICE $48.69 SERVICE $300.00 SERVICE $100.00 SERVICE $17.34 SERVICE $21.49 $487.52 PHOTO SUPPLIES $1,442.10 SUPPLIES $674.70 $2,116.80 OFFICE SUPPLIES $119.76 OFFICE SUPPLIES $123.14 OFFICE SUPPLIES $52.46 $295.36 MAP LITES $77.50 $77.50 PARTS $118.26 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT PARTS $16.31 $134.57 MOTRA TRANSMISSIONS REBUILD P-16 TRANSMISSION $725.00 $210.00 $725.00 $210.00 NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY INC. SEMINARS VIDEO TAPES $29.50 $29.50* NOVAK & PARKER PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $?0.97 MISC EXPENSES$24.00 $60.00 MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $30.00 $184.97* ERIC E. PIEE RADIO REPAIRS $505.00 $25.16 $505.00 $25.16 QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES PARTS APPLICANT POLYGRAPH EXAMS $5,670.00 APPLICANT POLYGRAPH EXAMS $4,320.00 $9,990.00 RPM AUTOMOTIVE INC. WESSON ACADEMY PARTS AUTOMATICS SCHOOL-LEE $53.97 $305.00 $53.97 $305.00 SMITH & SUNBURST COMMUNICATIONS,INC TRUTH ABOUT ALCOHOL FILM $157.94 $700.00 $157.94 THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE TUITION KERRIGAN TUITION KOLANOWSKI $400.00 CREDIT TUITION TRACY $600.00- $65.20 $500.00 $65.20 XL/DATACOMP INC. JANUARY MAINTENANCE POLICE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $17,571.63 GENERAL FUND $17,571.63 ******************************************************************************************************** FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. AAA TRAVEL AGENCY TICKET-TRILL $355.00 $13.20 $355.00 $13.20 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES FIRECALC POCKET COMPUTER $71.71 $71.71 AKRON BRASS CO DON ANDERSON COMPUTER PAPER $16.96 $16.96 ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC LINEN SERVICE $141.22 LINEN SERVICE $108.17 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16192 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. LINEN SERVICE $60.26 $309.65 ARLINGTON TRANSMISSIONS REPAIRS $320.00 $471.00 $320.00 $471.00 BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC. BUFFALO GROVE FIRE DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES REGISTER ULREICH $85.00 $85.00 BUTLER PAPER COMPANY CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS PAPER 070 0057060 0 $33.25 $164.13 $33.25 $164.13 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BA77-JT-2404-A $9.03 $358.00 $9.03 $358.00 DOUGLAS TV EMERY & ASSOCIATES VCR REGISTER FLORY/ULREICH $200.00 $200.00* FIRETAC SYSTEMS SIGNS SIGNS $35.00 $12.00 $47.00 GALL'S, INC. SUPPLIES $114.45 $54.99 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $54.99- $114.45 W. W. GRAINGER INC. TOOLS $245.02 $245.02 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $72.08 $56.97 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $114.34 $243.39 HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY SUPPLIES $40.28 $19.00 $40.28 $19.00 IGE, INCORPORATED CYLINDER OXYGEN $400.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE SERVICE $103.50 $503.50 ISFSI REGISTER ULREICH/CLARK $310.00 $310.00 KAR PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIES $177.92 $66.50 $177.92 KREST UNIFORMS, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES $70.00 $136.50 LEATHERMAN TOOLS $384.91 $384.91 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS ,& OFFIC OFFICE SUPPLIES $282.12 $24.74 $306.86 MAC'S FIRE AND SAFETY, INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES $1,280.00 $1 280.00 JOHN MALCOLM - F.D. TUITION REIMB $132.80 $79.60 132.80 $79.60 MONTGOMERY WARD & CO. NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY VHS TAPES PARTS $144.81 PARTS $48.20 CREDIT PARTS $3.93 - PARTS $41.60 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE PAGE AMERICA R & R UNIFORMS INC. R. SCHMITT SIMON-DUPLEX, INC. SUBURBAN GAS SALES TELEPUNCH INC. DENNIS THILL - F.D. TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN. UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBA WORDPERFECT CORP. FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. VILLAGE -OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARTS $27.24 PARTS $13.97 PARTS $19.90 PARTS $17.51 PARTS $46.30 PARTS $21.57 PARTS $11.38 PARTS $32.29 PARTS $21.57 PARTS $75.97 PARTS $8.95 PARTS $54.10 PARTS $172.81 CREDIT PARTS $15.00 - PARTS $105.13 PARTS $20.08 $864.45 FLOOR MATS $189.50 $189.50 SERVICE $238.87 $238.87 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $16.50 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $96.50 $113.00 SUPPLIES $80.00 $80.00 HEATER SWITCH $22.75 MOTOR HANNAY $153.00 $175.75 OXYGEN CYLINDERS $60.00 $60.00 SUPPLIES $18.80 $18.80 EXPENSES $662.20 $662.20 SUPPLIES $242.95 $242.95 TRAINING REINLEIN $50.00 TRAINING HUEMANN $35.00 $85.00 SOFTWARE UPGRADE $105.00 $105.00 ***TOTAL** $9,263.68 GENERAL FUND $7,623.66 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $1,640.02 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL ******************************************************************************************************** HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE,INC. MANUAL $37.32 $37.32 AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC. SENIOR TAXI PROGRAM $488.55 $488.55 WILL ASHLEY DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $15.00 $15.00 LEONARD W. BAZAN DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $27.00 $27.00 HAZEL FRICKE DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $3.00 $3.00 CAROLYN HENDERSON DECEMBMER DRIVER REIMB $9.00 $9.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $400.00 $400.00 LISA LEVIN DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $3.00 $3.00 RAY LUNDIN DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $12.00 $12.00 LINDA MARKAY DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $6.00 $6.00 EARLE MATTSON DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $18.00 $18.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $74.70 $7$4.70* OTTO SCHERR DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB JEANNE SHERMAN DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $9.©0 $99.00 .00 BERTHA STEIL DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $15.00 $15.00 KATHI WESLEY DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $15.00 $15.00 HELEN WHITLOCK DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $6.00 $6.00 VIRGINIA ZITO DECEMBER DRIVER REIMB $12.00 $12.00 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,159.57 GENERAL FUND $1,159.57 ******************************************************************************************************** PLANNING DEPARTMENT ABC PLUMBING CDBG 413 E LINCOLN $570.00 $570.00 BROADACRE CONSULTING COMPANY CONSULTING SERVICES $5,247.50 $5,247.50 ******************************************************************************************************** STREET DIVISION ABM, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $83.95 PAGE 13 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $39.97 $33.12 PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 $55.73 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES $19.75 ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO BOXWOOD ADV PGRM NOV $2,555.56 $2,555.56 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $32.70 $40.92 $73.62* SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C MISC EXPENSES HEALTH CARE SERVICE $1,333.33 $1,333.33 PLANNING DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES ***TOTAL** $9,780.01 GENERAL FUND $5,321.12 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $4,458.89 ******************************************************************************************************** STREET DIVISION ABM, INC. PARTS $83.95 $83.95 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $39.97 $33.12 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $55.73 SUPPLIES $71.85 SUPPLIES $19.75 SUPPLIES $49.50 SUPPLIES$78.75 CREDIT SUPPLIES $43.92- SUPPLIES $.62 SUPPLIES $2.61 $307.98 ARZO SALT INC. SALT $4,667.86 $3,584.59 SALT SALT $5 671.51 $13,923.96 ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY COLD PATCH 363.80 $18.95 $363.80 AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, ,IN SUPPLIES $51.85 SUPPLIES RODS $20.27 $91.07 AMERICAN INTERTOOL, INC. CREDIT BLADES $35.2$ BLADES VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1116%92 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION BLADES $21.50 $28.88 AMERICAN SAFETY UTILITY CORP. HOOKS $27.25 $27.25 ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO. JANUARY MAINTENANCE $147.00 $147.00 ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY LOCK SUPPLIES $9.48 LOCK SUPPLIES $10.00 CYLINDER CHANGE $20.00 $39.48 BERM PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, INC CRACKSEALING $3,105.00 CRACKSEALING $5,731.80 $8,836.80 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER PARTS $17.48 PARTS $8.40- PARTS $5.00- PARTS $249.32 PARTS $494.71 $748.11 THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY MTCE SUPPLIES $116.02 MTCE SUPPLIES $20.25 $136.27 BUSSE HARDWARE SUPPLIES $57.95 $57.95 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEANING SUPPLIES $490.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES $490.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES $490.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES $331.50 CLEANING SUPPLIES $331.50 $2,133.00 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLEANING SUPPLIES $349.79 CLEANING SUPPLIES $349.79 CLEANING SUPPLIES $28.08 CLEANING SUPPLIES $28.07 $755.73 CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI WATER USAGE $78.88 $78.88 CITRON CHEMICAL, INC. SUPPLIES $434.91 SUPPLIES $128.23 $563.14 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS 12%16-31/91 SERVICE $1,796.00 TE P HELP PUBLIC WORKS $231.60 $2,027.60 COMMONWEALTH EDISON NOV91 STREET LIGHTING $7,239.55 SIGNAL LIGHTING NOV 91 $4,875.72 $12,115.27 COOK COUNTY TREASURER MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $1,406.70 $1,406.70 COURTESY HOME CENTER SUPPLIES $15.07 $15.07 DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. SERVICE DOORS $552.00 $552.00 ENGINEMASTERS, INC. GASKETS $15.82 $15.82 VENDOR STREET DIVISION FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC. FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS, INC G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO THE GLIDDEN COMPANY GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES W. W. GRAINGER INC. H & H ELECTRIC CO. P J HARTMANN COMPANY HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC. ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT KAR PRODUCTS INC LEE AUTO PARTS MCMASTER-CARR MJB TOOLS MOTOROLA, INC. NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. NORTHERN ILLINOIS HORT. ASSOC. NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16%92 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL E7 EAGLES $31.26 E7 EAGLES $31.26 $62.52 SUPPLIES $61.06 SUPPLIES $92.01 $153.07 YELLOW MARKING PAINT $146.74 $146.74 UNIFORM RENTAL$153.50 UNIFORM RENTAL $153.12 UNIFORM SERVICE $161.37 $467.99 PAINT $40.18 PAINT $31.77 $71.95 TIRES $205.92 TIRES $102.96 $308.88 SUPPLIES $174.84 SUPPLIES $57.36 $232.20 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MICE $1,232.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE $1,232.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE $1,232.00 $3,696.00 STORAGE TANK REMOVAL REPORT $495.00 $495.00 PARTS $4.00 $4.00 REPAIRS $410.04 $410.04 DISPOSABLE GLOVES $95.24 $95.24 PARTS $153.87 PARTS $233.60 $387.47 LIGHTWEIGHT STEEL HINGE FLASHLITES W/CHARGES $47.04 $654.00 $47.04 $654.00 PAGER REPAIR $48.00 $48.00 CK&ADJUST SIGN SHOP UNIT $58.00 SERVICES RENDERED $210.32 $268.32 1700 W CENTRAL $3,303.77 $3,303.77 REGISTRATIONS $225.00 $225.00 DEC 91 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $7.50 DEC 91 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $27.54 DEC 91 ELECRICAL SUPPLIES $276.10 DEC 91 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $26.65 DEC 91 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $77.60 $415.39 REGISTER DORSEY $50.00 $50.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION NOVAK & PARKER INC. MICROWAVE REPLACEMENT $159.95 $159.95 THE OMNI USER MEMBERSHIP ANDLER $20.00 $20.00* P & W INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC. SUPPLIES $73.35 $73.35 PETROLANE GAS SERVICE PROPANE $456.96 $456.96 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $32.26 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $4.30 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $111.61 $148.17* POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS $58.43 $58.43 QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL PARTS $57.06 CREDIT PARTS $37.71 - PARTS $31.60 PARTS $19.72 PARTS $3.45 PARTS $11.90 $183.79 RPM AUTOMOTIVE INC. PARTS $6.02 $6.02 SEARS TOOLS $158.35 TOOLS $53.45 $211.80 SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY SUPPLIES $186.94 TOOLS $146.22 $333.16 SHEPP PEST CONTROL JAN 92 PEST CONTROL $40.00 JAN 92 PEST CONTROL $40.00 JAN 92 PEST CONTROL $40.00 JAN 92 PEST CONTROL $40.00 JAN 92 PEST CONTROL $40.00 JAN 92 PEST CONTROL $40.00 $240.00 SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY CLEAR PLASTIC GUARD $82.66 CLEAR PLASTIC GUARD $20.66 CREDIT CLEAR PLASTIC GUARD $20.66- $82.66 STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC. MOEN FAUCET $103.65 $521.50 $103.65 $521.50 STANTON POWER RODDING CATCH/BASIN/INLET CLNG STATE TREASURER MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $242.96 MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $381.18 MTCE TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNALS $529.11 MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $265.29 MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS $475.92 $1,894.46 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1116192 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION TECH SYN CORPORATION INDUSTRIAL HOSE ASSEMBLY $200.85 $18.50 $200.85 $18.50 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS VAN DOORN ROOFING, INC. PUBLICATIONS REPAIRED PW ROOF $66.20 $66.20 HOWARD L. WHITE & ASSOCIATES, SUPPLIES TABLE & SEAT TOPS $73.50 $1,680.00 TRASH RECEPTACLES $830.40 $2,583.90 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO EXTERIOR WINDOW, CLEANING $81.00 $81.00 EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING $81.00 $243.00 STREET DIVISION ***TOTAL** $63,604.68 GENERAL FUND $37,255.84 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $25,796.84 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $552.00 ******************************************************************************************************** WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ABM, INC. MICE AGREEMENT $278.00 $21.06 $278.00 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $81.99,5103.05 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND TRANSFER FEES $173.63 $41.25 $173.63 $41.25 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT SUPPLIES PUBLICATION LASER LABELS $19.94 $19.94 ARVEY PAPER & AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES MTCE OCTOBER $550.00 $173.60 SERVICE CALL NOV 91 MTCE INSPECTION $550.00 $1,273.60 B & H INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES $40.13 $7.20 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $6.80 $54.13 MELVYN BOTH REIMB CDL $40.00 $249.32 $40.00 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER PARTS PARTS $381.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 VENDOR PURCHASE-DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION PARTS $494.71 $1,125.53 BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS ARRANGEMENT-BOTH 63.50 $83.00 $63.50 CADE INDUSTRIES GLOVES $383.00 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BB72-JT-5608-D $160.62 BB72-JT-8548-A $11.99 $172.61 CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA $106,572.00 LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA $61,976.00 POWER COSTS-JAWA $11,157.00 OPER/MAINT COSTS-JAWA $12,498.00 $192,203.00 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ENGINEERING SERVICES $2,250.00 $2,250.00 DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC. PULVERIZED TOPSOIL $2,670,00 $2,670.00 G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO UNIFORM RENTAL $153.49 UNIFORM RENTAL $153.12 UNIFORM SERIVCE $161.37 $467.98 G & 0 THERMAL SUPPLY COMPANY THERMOSTAT $81.28 $81.28 W. W. GRAINGER INC. LMT SWITCH STEEL ROD $47.70 $47.70 H-B-K WATER METER SERVICE METER INST. $142.74 WATER METER LABOR $292.91 METER INST $214.11 $649.76 I.B.M. CORPORATION JAN MICE COMPUTERS/PRINTER $194.00 MTCE AGREEMENT $115.37 JAN MTCE COMPUTERS/PRINTER $52.00 $361.37 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICES, $18.54 SERVICE $300.00 SERVICE $17.35 SERVICE $18.92 $354.81 JULIE, INC. DEC 91 CHARGES $112.52 DEC 91 CHARGES $25.31 $137.83 LAND AND LAKES CO REFUSE DISPOSAL $354.00 $354.00 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC OFFICE SUPPLIES $187.26 $187.26 LEE AUTO PARTS PARTS $39.96 PARTS $92.23 $132.19 AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION MTN TAPE DRIVE & CONTROLLER- $995.00 $995.00 MJB TOOLS FLASHLITES W/CHARGES $981.00 $981.00 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA $68.55 117 N WAVERLY $76.37 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY POSTMASTER QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. REGION 5 SALES & SERVICE, INC. R.J.N. COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. RTP - SUBURBAN SAFETY SUPPLY ILLINOIS SEARS SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY SOUND INCORPORATED SYSTEMS 3X400 V & G PRINTERS INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WATER ENVIRONMENT FEDERATION WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER & SEWER FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16192 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL 1700 W CENTRAL $3,303.77 NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND $87.92 $3,536.61 DEC 91 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $53.88 DEC 91 ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES $17.50 $71.38 MISC EXPENSESg 50 $.50* TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $44.48 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $6.26 $50.74* PARTS $58.43 $58.43 POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS $551.70 POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS $555.37 $1,107.07* PARTS $1$39.26 PARTS 9.4 PARTS $12.87 PARTS $18.16, PARTS. $36.54 $216.31 FILM & PROCESSING $52.15 FILM PROCESSING $10.19 $62.34 MAKITA MITER SAW $229.95 $229.95 REGISTER DORSEY $80.00 COMPUTER SOFTWARE $3,830.00 $3 910.00 MTCE PROGRAM $674.25674.25 EQUIPMENT $41.21 SAFETY TRIPOD $2,889.00 $2,930.21 TOOLS $234.90 $234.90 SUPPLIES $39.99 $39.99 SECURITY SERVICE -DOOR $178.00 $178.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $12.00 $12.00 MESSAGE PADS $350.00 $350.00 12/31 ARMOR FEE BOBROWSKI $12.83 $12.83* MEMBER FEE ANDLER $99.00 $99.00 ***TOTAL** $219,375.93 $219,375.93 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY POSTMASTER REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES FINISHMASTER, INC. CHARLES R. HARDY & ASSOCIATES DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION POSTAGE FOR REFUSE MAILING $180,805.03 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES WATER REMOVAL SAFETY SITE AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES CONSULTING SERVICES $3;018.78 $45,390.83 $105396.64 $24:765. ,$2,233.61 ***TOTAL** $181.20 $47.04 $11,780.00 $79.27 $4.24 $1,200.00 $178,571.42 $2,233.61* $180,805.03 $228.24 $11,780.00 $83.51 $1,200.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1%16/92 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C DECEMBER LAND LEASE $1,183.25 $1,183.25 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS JAN1-.15 JANITORIAL SERVICE $1,796.00 $1,796.00 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING $81.00 $81.00 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $3,060.25 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $3,060.25 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ARC DISPOSAL COMPANY POSTMASTER REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES FINISHMASTER, INC. CHARLES R. HARDY & ASSOCIATES DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION DECEMBER 91 COLLECTION POSTAGE FOR REFUSE MAILING $180,805.03 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES WATER REMOVAL SAFETY SITE AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES AUTO PAINT SUPPLIES CONSULTING SERVICES $3;018.78 $45,390.83 $105396.64 $24:765. ,$2,233.61 ***TOTAL** $181.20 $47.04 $11,780.00 $79.27 $4.24 $1,200.00 $178,571.42 $2,233.61* $180,805.03 $228.24 $11,780.00 $83.51 $1,200.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO SUPPLIES CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS DIAMOND JUBILEE BANNER EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING 9.45 $9.45 $3,0 0.00 $830.00 $3,830.00 $171.00 $171.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $4,010.45 GENERAL FUND $4,010.45 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1/16/92 VENDOR PURCHASE.DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER, STEEL STEEL $649.00 $649.00 $1,298.00 A. J. MAGGIO CO. PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG CONST $110,349.00 $110,349.00 KELLY P. REYNOLDS & ASSOCIATES PLAN REVIEW $2,548.68 $2,548.68 RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES $12,232.95 $12,232.95 BARRY A. SPRINGER LEGAL SERVICES LEGAL SERVICES $3 138.75 168.75 $3,307.50 SUNBELT INDUSTRIAL SERVICES ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT $3,000.00 $3,000.00 TECH SYN CORPORATION PIPE ADAPTERS $37.61 $37.61 TRKLA, PETTIGREW, ALLEN&PAYNE CONSULTANT SERVICES $2,502.35 $2,502.35 UNISON CONSTRUCTION, INC. NW HWY SIDEWALK $1,402.15 $1,402.15 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $149,969.99 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $1,647.36 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $8,641.10 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $125,877.68 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $1,570.90 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $12,232.95 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO SUPPLIES CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS DIAMOND JUBILEE BANNER EXTERIOR WINDOW CLEANING 9.45 $9.45 $3,0 0.00 $830.00 $3,830.00 $171.00 $171.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $4,010.45 GENERAL FUND $4,010.45 VENDOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL FUND DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11987C PENSION FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1116/92 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL BOND TRANSFER FEES $326.89 BOND TRANSFER FEES $500.00 $826.89 FLOOD LOAN INT 1J1/92 $296.38 FLOOD LOAN PRIN 1/1/92 $3,347.35 $3,643.73 ***TOTAL** $4,470.62 $3,643.73 P W FACILITY B & 11987E $326.89 $500.00 NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $883.22 $200.00 $883.22 CHARLES W. NICK VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JANUARY 92 PENSION FEB MEDICAL $1,482.33 484.50 $ 1482.33 PAUL H. WATKINS JAN DISABILITYSBENEFIT ***TOTAL** $3,050.05 PENSION FUNDS GENERAL FUND $883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83 $1,755,646.89 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL DATE RUN 1/16/92 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TIME RUN 11.04.37 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING SUMMARY BY FUND 1/16/92 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $533,107.03 21 REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND $180,921.51 22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $27,879.84 23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $5,892.26 24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $75,977.85 31 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83 41 WATER & SEWER FUND $320,773.56 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $5,953.49 48 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $1,647.36 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $115,451.32 51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $10,833.12 53 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $125,877.68 56 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $1,570.90 58 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $234,483.45 64 POLICE & FIRE BLDG B & I 1991A $80,000.00 69 P W FACILITY B & I 1987E $326.89 70 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11987C $500.00 73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $7,320.13 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $24,963.67 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,755,646.89 PAGE 23 ID-APPBAR VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT December 1, 19,91 - December 31, 1991 Fund Revenues Expenses Fund Balance for for Balance Nov 30 1991 December 1991 December 1991 Dec, 31 1991 General and SRecial Revenue Funds General Fund $ 2,252,098 $1,080,191 $1,552,740 $ 1,779,549 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 394,919 90,135 34,840 450,214 Community Development Block Grant 105,325 29,000 16,612 117,713 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund < 7,210> 4,509 60,144 < 62,845> Enterprise Funds Water & Sewer Fund 4,520,003 350,375 1,012,567 3,857,811 Parking System Revenue Fund 166,329 14,360 8,818 171,871 internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund 1,124,053 211,137 188,613 1,146,577 Vehicle Replacement Fund 462,176 26,344 57,536 430,984 Capital Projects Capital Improvement Fund 631,172 55,560 24,567 662,165 Downtwon Redev. Const. Funds 342,531 2,501 16,457 328,575 Police & Fire Building Construction 5,894,542 32,264 < 152,373> 6,079,179 Flood Control Const. Fund 2,402,905 3,588 < 31,903> 2,438,396 Debt Service Funds 1,699,007 92,493 1,143,103 648,397 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust - Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund - 16,728,808 176,572 69,699 16,835,681 Firemen's Pension Fund 18,717,552 193,958 82,281 18,829,229 Benefit Trust Funds 252.045 1.525 2.167251,403 $55.686.255 $2.364.512 54.085,868 853,964,899 V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 RiUSE DISPOSAL FUND TAX REVENUE 1,754,550.00 .00 1,754,550.00 100.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 130,500.00 .00 130,500.00 100.00 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE omaQO- .00 636,E 100.00 FUND TOTALS MMO50100. .00 2,521 ,SO.00, 100.00 X ' TOM FUEL TAX FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,150,000.00 737,422.94 412,577.06 35.87 OTHER REVENUE 55.%00_0_0_ 34m388.9$ 20,01__ 37.81 FUND TOTALS ?.205.30010017� 1.87_ 433.488.13 35.% X COMMUNITY INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 305,130.00 313,996.00 8,866.00- 2.90 - OTHER REVENUE 20,000.00 SJ38.15 11.861.85 59.30 FUND TOTALS _ 325,130Q0_ , 322.134.15 - 2,995,85 .92 X R R TAX REVENUE 695,775.00 361,547.93 334,227.07 48.03 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 50,000.00 28,519.62 21,480.38 42.96 BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT GENERAL FUND AMOUNT RECEIVED BALANCE BALANCE TAX REVENUE 10,559,300.00 5,376,261.16 5,183,038.84 49.08 FEE REVENUE 1,731,100.00 1,530,124.71 200,975.29 11.60 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,056,000.00 1,472,647.76 583,352.24 28.37 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 356,100.00 229,657.12 126,442.88 35.50 FINES AND FORFEITS 370,600.00 165,163.27 205,436.73 55.43 OTHER REVENUE 791.650,.00_ 624,136.$1 167,513,49 21.16 FUND TOTALS 15.864,750.00 9,397,990.53 6� 40.76 X- RiUSE DISPOSAL FUND TAX REVENUE 1,754,550.00 .00 1,754,550.00 100.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 130,500.00 .00 130,500.00 100.00 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE omaQO- .00 636,E 100.00 FUND TOTALS MMO50100. .00 2,521 ,SO.00, 100.00 X ' TOM FUEL TAX FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,150,000.00 737,422.94 412,577.06 35.87 OTHER REVENUE 55.%00_0_0_ 34m388.9$ 20,01__ 37.81 FUND TOTALS ?.205.30010017� 1.87_ 433.488.13 35.% X COMMUNITY INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 305,130.00 313,996.00 8,866.00- 2.90 - OTHER REVENUE 20,000.00 SJ38.15 11.861.85 59.30 FUND TOTALS _ 325,130Q0_ , 322.134.15 - 2,995,85 .92 X R R TAX REVENUE 695,775.00 361,547.93 334,227.07 48.03 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 50,000.00 28,519.62 21,480.38 42.96 V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U 0 6 E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT ILL, MUNICIPAL R. M T A T RECGALAN OTHER REVENUE 5OO,QQ 1.768.80 731.20 29.24 FUND TOTALS 748,275. DO, 391.836.35 35 ,x,5,„ 47.63 % BENEFIT TRUST M OTHER REVENUE 20.000.00 12.42.77 7,572.23 37.86 FUND TOTALS �?'_ 12.477 77 7.577..23 37.86 % IBRARY FUND TAX REVENUE 2,123,655.00 .00 2,123,655.00 100.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 78,500.00 .00 78,500.QO 100.00 OTHER REVENUE 621,500.00 _ QQ 621,500.00 100.00 FUND TOTALS L823,65S.00� .00 2.823.655.00 100.00 X WATER i SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 1,373,050.00 867,163.96 505,886.04 36.84 FEE REVENUE 15,000.00 10,076.32 4,923.68 32.82 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 4,440,000.00 3,200,483.52 1,239,516.48 27.91 OTHER REVENUE 411,15 00 „,,,,,,,22¢,.QQL47 154,441.53 37.51 FUND TOTALS 6.239.200.00 4.334.632.27 ,,L2Q 67 7 - 30.52 % SYSTEMPARKING REVENUE FEE REVENUE 2,880.00 2,160.00 720.00 25.00 PARKING REVENUE 171,500.00 116,605.91 54,894.09 32.00 OTHER REVENUE 1016,Wag 3,659.78 36.59 FUND TOTALS „„ 84,,,,380100u._...j,2'�,.��¢s ' 59. x.87 32.14 % V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT R. F N R V HBALANCE SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 581,900.00 581,900.00 .00 .00 OTHER REVENUE b ,000.000 49,121,06 13,8.-774 22.03 FUND TOTALS 644,900.00 631 Q 1 Q4 13,878.94 2.15 % RISK MAN FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 1,892,550.00 1,170,400.00 722,150.00 38.15 OTHER REVENUE 382,.600.00 308,627,51 73.972,.49 19.33 FUND TOTALS ?,?75,150.00 1.479.027.51 79¢,1 49 34.99 % IMPROVEMENT FUN TAX REVENUE 403,750.00 219,117.81 184,632.19 45.72 FEE REVENUE 40,000.00 •00 40.000.00 1010.00 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 865,000.00 527,603.45 337,3%.55 39.00 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 250,ODO.00 l .00 250,000.00 100.00 OTHER REVENUE 1,465,ow, _Do „ 157,563.% 1k,3Q7.436.94 89.24 FUND TOTALS „3,023,]50.00 9%,g§5.22 2,119,464.78 70.09 % COMET FM OTHER REVENUE 135.000.00 X09.570.14 25,429. &i_ 18.83 FUND TOTALS 1,3,5.000,00......109.,5,,07,,14, ?&,4,2.,9,.;,$6 18.83 % P PROCE OTHER REVENUE 4. TOO, O00.,00 4,139,791,75 39,721.75- .96 - FUND TOTALS 4.100.000.00 ,4,,,139.721.75_39.721.75- .96-% V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT T R FEE REVENUE 13,500.00 12,875.00 625.00 4.62 OTHER REVENUE .00 5.274.25 5,274,,,25- •00 FUND TOTALS 13.500.00 1§,149.?a5 4.649.25- 34.43-X NT RGDEVLPffT CONST1 OTHER REVENUE 1.025.000.00 53.588.84 491.411,16_ 47.94 FUND TOTALS 1,025.000.00 533.588.84 4 471 _1¢ 47.94 % powgTomNR T199 FUND TOTALS .00 .00 .00 % FLM CQM TROL CONST FUND 1,991 TAX REVENUE 450,000.00 .04 450,000.00 100.00 OTHER REVENUE 2,950100-0-00 .9B FUND TOTALS 3.400,000.00 2.979,061.61, 420,938 �S'7_ 12.38 % FLOOD CONTROLF 1992 OTHER REVENUE 2,775.000.00 100'00 FUND TOTALS 2.775.000.00 _ - - _eD 2.775.000.00 100.00 % CO ORATE PURPOSES 9 i 11973 TAX REVENUE 154,200.00 87,786.74 66,413.26 43.06 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5,400.00 4,750.00 650.00 12.03 OTHER REVENUE 10.000.00 6.74',¢ 3 X56 g 32.56 FUND TOTALS 1699.00? 30. 19,80 41.46 % V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 SSA 1 PRO ,,$PECT MEA TAX REVENUE 19,700.00 9,329.54 10,370.46 52.64 OTHER REVENUE 2,,500,00 1.797.49 702.11 28.10 FUND TOTALS 22,209,00 u-va ,- 11,Q7g.97 49.87 X A #Z BLAC & TAX REVENUE 19,950.00 8,497.29 11,452.71 57.40 OTHER REVENUE 3,000.00 1,839,54 _ _1.160.46 38.68 FUND TOTALS 2?,950.99 1336.83 b11.17 54.95 % FIRE BUILDING 9 R TAX REVENUE 200,000.00 80,050.77 119,949.23 59.97 OTHER REVENUE W9Q.90- --99,199-IL _ 18,557-17- 237.14 - FUND TOTALS 291,500:-9.4_?Q0, 1IP?.94 101 . 392106._ 50.31 X qMMT.QWK REDEYLPHT 0 A 1 1991 INTERFUND TRANSFER$ 49,000.00 15,999.24 33,000.76 67.34 OTHER REVENUE .00 2,,524.0,7 2.524,07- .00 FUND TOTALS 49.000.00_ ? X31____M474-69 62.19 % BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT C_QftPORATf PURPOSES p A 1 1974 AMOUNT RECEIVED SALANCE BALANCE TAX REVENUE 232,950.00 139,269.68 93,680.32 40.21 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 8,000.00 6,700.00 1,300.00 16.25 OTHER REVENUE 17.000,00 10,21.45 6.478.55 38.10 FUND TOTALS 25TH 950,.00 156.491,.13 101,,4,5,,8,7 39.33 X SSA 1 PRO ,,$PECT MEA TAX REVENUE 19,700.00 9,329.54 10,370.46 52.64 OTHER REVENUE 2,,500,00 1.797.49 702.11 28.10 FUND TOTALS 22,209,00 u-va ,- 11,Q7g.97 49.87 X A #Z BLAC & TAX REVENUE 19,950.00 8,497.29 11,452.71 57.40 OTHER REVENUE 3,000.00 1,839,54 _ _1.160.46 38.68 FUND TOTALS 2?,950.99 1336.83 b11.17 54.95 % FIRE BUILDING 9 R TAX REVENUE 200,000.00 80,050.77 119,949.23 59.97 OTHER REVENUE W9Q.90- --99,199-IL _ 18,557-17- 237.14 - FUND TOTALS 291,500:-9.4_?Q0, 1IP?.94 101 . 392106._ 50.31 X qMMT.QWK REDEYLPHT 0 A 1 1991 INTERFUND TRANSFER$ 49,000.00 15,999.24 33,000.76 67.34 OTHER REVENUE .00 2,,524.0,7 2.524,07- .00 FUND TOTALS 49.000.00_ ? X31____M474-69 62.19 % V I L L A G E O F H 0 U N T P R O S P E C T B U 0 G E T R E V E N U E S U N N A R Y 5/01/91 — 12/31/91 BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT INSURANCE,RfIERVe 0 1 I AMOUNT RECEIVED A OTHER REVENUE 1.00p.00 X15_ 157.59— 15.75— FUND TOTALS u 1QQ, 157.59- 15.75—X FLOW CONTRQ.L 8 9 I 1991 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 90,500.00 87,867.31 2,632.69 2.90 OTHER REVENUE x00 1 ,990.II7 13,990.37- .00 FUND TOTALS 90.500.00 iOl.857.68 11.357.68— 12.544 DOWNTOWN REDEYLPNT 8 L I 1987D TAX REVENUE 115,000.00 149,914.75 34,914.75- 30.36— OTHER REVENUE SAO Q.00 5.714.14 T14.14- 14.28— FUND TOTALS �120,000100 155n628:,.$9.. ,„„_ ,628.89„-, 29.69-% P W FACT61TY 0 A 1, 1987E TAX REVENUE 371,550.00 206,783.81 164,766.19 44.34 OTHER REVENUE 25,000.00 ___x„¢,,„¢_9.10_ 8.730.90 34.92 FUND TOTALS 396M0.00 99LLS2.91 17� 43.75 X DOWATOWN R 1987C TAX REVENUE 119,500.00 119,145.00 355.00 .29 OTHER REVENUE 145.00 _ 2.4,E +4,55_ 98.31 FUND TOTALS 119,645.00 �19�14„ 7,45 41 X POLICE TAX REVENUE 76,500.00 27,389.26 49,110.74 64.19 V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T R E V E N U E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT EOLICE PENSION FOD AMOUNT RECEIVED BALANCE A OTHER REVENUE 1.94$ 00.QQ1,433,927.04 33300.00 17,168.63_ 514 26.40 FUND TOTALS p25.0AQ,OO 1.461.316.30 Sf3,6$3 a0 27.$3 X NSION FUND TAX REVENUE 25,500.00 .00 25,500.00 100.00 OTHER REVENUE 2,18112M.OQ, Ia5,62,117,6,6 619 78'x,3k 28.40 FUND TOTALS,,. 247.4510_;00 _L2g,11.7,;-,,6th ,.,,..6N"5.28 .34 29.23 X CAPITALMP E 1 FUND TOTALS ^.O.,Q '00 X FLOW CONTROL 8 & I 1992A FUND TOTALS loo .00 X MdTM RIDEYLPMT 0 $ I 12M FUND TOTALS QQ 00 .00 .00 X TAX REVENUE 32,200.00 16,393.28 15,806.72 49.08 OTHER REVENUE 1,500.00 775,35 124,65 48.31 FUND TOTALS 33300.00 17,168.63_ 1 .5311,37 49.05 X TOTALS ALL FUNDS 53,041,035.00 30,187,678.02 22,853,356.98 43.06 X LESS TRANSFERS 389.500.00- IOU 55- 285.x,: 73.33 % TOTAL REVENUES 52.651.535.00 30.083,811.47 22.567,723.53 42.86 % VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 U D G E T E X P E N 0 I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 011 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION EXPEftQITURE CLAS f CAT BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROG fa CLAISIFICATIMXP 21,450.00 14,210.15 7,239.85 33.75 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 71,150.00 54,679.20 16,470.80 23.14 ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSION,QQO.00 61250.00 490;51 2,509.49 83.64 PROGRAM TOTALS 74,150.00 52,169.71 1$,980.29 25.59 % EXPEftQITURE CLAS f CAT PERSONAL SERVICES 21,450.00 14,210.15 7,239.85 33.75 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46,450.00 35,661.21 10,788.79 23.22 COMMODITIES 61250.00 -- 5,291.35 951,b3_ 15.22 EXPENDITURE TOTALS --Zjjj..m 59,169.71 1t} 9$0,24 25.59 % SOURCE OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 71,700.00 53,626.36 18,073.64 25.20 * ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 2.450.00 1,543.35 _ 90„6 37.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS ,.„„74,,_1450,;9,,. 55 1,,,6.9..,,,7„1... 1 480.29 25.59 % V I L L A G E O F N 0 U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 021 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 244,195.00 163,327.84 80,867.16 33.11 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216,020.00 129,526.29 86,493.71 40,03 COMMODITIES 3,400.00 1,406.51 1,993.49 58.63 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Sip.00 00 5500.00 100.00 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 464.115.000 ,2§Q,64 16 9,854_.36, 36.59 % JMRCE, OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 427,475.00 269,665.76 157,809.24 36.91 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 36.640.00 24,594,E 12,,045.12 32.87 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 464,115-00 294,x".40.64 1,92,854,36 36.59 X BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PR %_RAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 222,525.00 146,329.44 76,195.56 34.24 LEGAL SERVICES 157,500.00 92,427.38 65,072.62 41.31 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT i TRAININ 84.090.00 55,503.82, 28,586.18 33.99 PROGRAM TOTALS 464.115.00 294,26M4 169M4.36 36.59 % EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 244,195.00 163,327.84 80,867.16 33.11 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 216,020.00 129,526.29 86,493.71 40,03 COMMODITIES 3,400.00 1,406.51 1,993.49 58.63 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Sip.00 00 5500.00 100.00 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 464.115.000 ,2§Q,64 16 9,854_.36, 36.59 % JMRCE, OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 427,475.00 269,665.76 157,809.24 36.91 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 36.640.00 24,594,E 12,,045.12 32.87 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 464,115-00 294,x".40.64 1,92,854,36 36.59 X VILLAGE OF MOUNT P A 0 S P E C T 8 U 0 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U N N A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 022 COMMUNICATION DIVISION EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT exPReg BALANCE BALA NCE CABLE TV OPERATIONS 173,445.00 90,483.18 $2,961.82 47.83 VILLAGE TELEPHONE SYSTEM 41.750.00 X74 4.3 17.408.99 41.69 PROGRAM TOTALS 2,15,195.00 114,824J9 100370.81 46.64 % EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 113,875.00 67,340.77 46,534.23 40.86 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,620.00 43,043.85 27,576.15 39.04 COMMODITIES 13,000.00 2,988.68 10,011-32 77.01 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 17JQO�00 1,450,89 16,249.11 91.80 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 215,195A0- —114.M-12— IQ%370.81 46.64 % SO4 _URC,f 2F FONDS GENERAL FUND 215,195.0o _100_370.81 46.64 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 215195.00 _114.824-19 120,370.81 46.64 % V I L L A G 0 0 F N 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 8 U 0 G E T EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 031 FINANCE DEPARTMENT EXPENOMR1 CLASSIFICATIRY - BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLOSIFICATION 341,814.99 175,505.01 EXPEYM ----- 380,180.00 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 244,580.00 149,367.97 95,212.13 39.92 ACCOUNTING 91,935.00 61,762.23 30,172.77 32.81 PURCHASING 26,100.00 16,012.75 10,087.25 38.64 DATA PROCESSING 109,205.00 68,822.08 40,382.92 36.97 DUPLICATING SERVICES 35,000-00 28,681.37 6,318.63 18.05 INSURANCE 240,865.00 167,417.63 73,447.37 30.49 CUSTOMER SERVICES 161,010.00 99,168.26 61,841.74 38.40 CASH MANAGEMENT 41 - 59 33.84 PROGRAM TOTALS 9500.QD .L&ii__69_ _ffl _IgL"J. 49 34.90 % EXPENOMR1 CLASSIFICATIRY - PERSONAL SERVICES 517,320m 341,814.99 175,505.01 33.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 380,180.00 243,969.16 136,211.84 35.82 COMMODITIES 30,000.00 16,515A5 13,494.55 44.94 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 6.0m.00 10.95 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 233.5,00-00- -AguiLAL -laLAv-.mL 34.90 % JWRCE OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 853,340.00 554,220.67 299,119.33 35.05 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND --jQJjQ-,9Q- -53,A92,9L 33.35 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS --M.NgM- —AQZJAtBL —ULVIA- 34.90 X V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 032 VILLAGE CLERK'$ OFFICE EXPENOITURf CLASSIFICATION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 115,435.00 76,737.49 38,697.51 33.52 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 38,500.00 29,278.72 9,221.28 23.95 PROGRAM TOTALS 153,935.00 106 47,918.79 31.12 X EXPENOITURf CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 75,385.00 50,829.88 24,555.12 32.57 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,550.00 48,757.89 21,792.11 30.88 COMMODITIES 8,1000.00 6,42Q 44,_ 1.571.56 19.64 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 153.935.00 1„06,Q116.21 47,918.79 31.12 X %WRCg OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 141,965.00 97,912.27 44,052.73 31.03 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 11,970,0_Q 8,103.94 3.866,06 32.29 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 153 935,00 106.01„6;21_ 47� 31.12 X V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 035 RISK MANAGEMENT BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT P F AMOUNT F RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2,300.000.00 1,418,303.04 881,65+6,66 38.33 PROGRAM TOTALS 2.300.000.00 1,418,303.04 881,696.96 38.33 X RE C66$SZFICAllgfi CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,300.000.00 1,418,303.04 881,6%.20 38.33 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2.300,000.00 1,418,303.04 881,b S6 38.33 % RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 2,300.000.0D 1.418 1Q3 04 $81.696.96 38.33 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2,300.000.00 1,418,303,D4 ,x,696.96 38.33 % VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E 5 U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 037 INSPECTION SERVICES EXPENDITURE CU§SIFIC TION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLAS SIFICATIgfi AT EXP ND BALANCE BALANCE INSPECTION SERVICES 572,075.00 360,714.01 211,360.99 36.94 ENGINEERING SERVICES 456,525 293,483.58 163,041.42 35.71 PROGRAM TOTALS 1,,028,600,00, 654,197J9 374,402 41 36.39 % EXPENDITURE CU§SIFIC TION PERSONAL SERVICES 811,150.00 533,262.93 277,887.07 34.25 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 184,450.00 113,842.78 70,607.22 38.27 COMMODITIES 15,500.00 6,359.33 9,140.67 58.97 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 17,500,00 732,55 16J67-45 95.81 EXPENDITURE TOTALS Is28l609-0-0 654,197.59 374.402.41_ 36.39 % SOURCE OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 889,210.00 555,732.63 333,477.37 37.50 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 16,000.00 15,064.50 935.50 5.84 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND --j9L3-9Q-W- 83,400.40 39,989,54 32.40 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 1,028,600.00 65,4,197J9 374,402.4.1 36.39 % V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U N N A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 041 POLICE DEPARTMENT EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT F TAMOUNT 4,445,310.00 EXPENDED BALANCE WAKE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,202,510.00 765,411.74 437,098.26 36.34 PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 3,121,075.00 2,083,423.06 1,037,641.94 33.24 CRIME PREY., PUBLIC AND YOUTH 142,765.00 87,818.91 54,946.09 38.48 INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PRO 626,260.00 413,681.17 212,578.83 33.94 CROSSING GUARDS 48,250.00 23,153.27 25,096.73 52.01 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4 OPERAT !JgIJJQ gL ,338,,Qgk-S7_ 91.343,13 21.27 PROGRAM TOTALS 5.570.210.00 3.711,495.02 33.36 % EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 4,445,310.00 2,932,990.76 1,512,319.24 34.02 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 896,500.00 630,350.65 266,149.35 29.68 COMMODITIES 171,200.00 107,901.71 63,298.29 36.97 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES M200,0040,251.906,94LI2„ 4 L .00 u X550.,00 29.62 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 5.570.210.00 3.711.495.02 1,858.714.98 33.36 X SOURCE OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 4,997,840.00 3,273,082.55 1,724,757.45 34.51 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 112,470.00 71,834.89 40,635.11 36.12 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 171,400.00 164,627.58 6,772.42 3,95 POLICE PENSION FUND 288,500.00 4 L .00 u X550.,00 30.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 55,570,210.00 3.711,495.02 1.858,714,98 33.36 X V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E t T 8 U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 042 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT EXPENDIIWRE CLASSIFICATION ... . BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM aA$SIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 935,550.00 611,635.52 323,914.48 34.62 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 3,349,735.00 2,202,431.74 1,147,303.26 34.25 FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY 29,490.00 20,897.66 8,592.34 29.13 FIRE PREVENTION 285,475.00 177,851.47 107,623.53 37.69 COMMUNICATIONS 52,460.00 30,722.48 21,737.52 41.43 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERAT 275,705.00 224,496.78 51,208.22 18.57 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 18,350M ,-W 5,540.14 30.19 PROGRAM TOTALS 4,946,765.00 38 ,4 1 665 �919-49 33.67 % EXPENDIIWRE CLASSIFICATION ... . . ..... . PERSONAL SERVICES 4,009,015.00 2,629,187.50 1,379,827.50 34.41 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 728,490.00 503,428.01 225,061.99 30.89 COMMODITIES 108,235.00 78,435.29 29,799.71 27.53 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1 __§LZ9_4.71 107.970.00 30.91 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 4,946,765.00 3,280,845.51 1,01.212 49 33.67 % %NRCE OF ------- GENERAL FUND 4,362,970.00 2,839,064.74 1,523,905.26 34.92 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 44,310.00 29,659.45 14,650.55 33.06 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 179,585.00 160,191.32 19,393.68 10.79 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND ]S9,900.00 2,551 930.Q0 107.970.00 30.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 4,9M,765,00 1,OIA12-49- 33.67 % V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U D 6 E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U N N A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 043 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PINRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED POLICE i FIRE DISPATCH SERVICE _ 321,,9,25.0a1 247.785.24 _81,139,76 24.66 PROGRAM TOTALS 328,,925,.00 _ ,7 24 8'r,139.76 24.66 % WITURE CLASSIFICATION CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 328,925.00 246,690.00 82,235.00 25.00 COMMODITIES ,,.,„.99-1,095.24 1,095.24- .DO EXPENDITURE TOTALS 328,RU 4- 7 785.E 81,,139.76 24.66 X SOURCEFUNDS GENERAL FUND RC925,00 _4�7 7_85;24 81,139.76 24.66 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 328.425.00 247.785.24 24.66 % V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 052 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION UPE401TURE CLASSIfICATIM.. BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM C SS T A EX PCNftg 100,920.58 36.52 INFORMATION, REFERRAL, i COUNS 191,160.00 135,332.72 55,827.28 29.20 RECREATION AND EDUCATION 18,440.00 13,307.25 5,132.75 27.83 HOMEBOUND SERVICES 84,510.00 47,157.36 37,352.64 44.19 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES 49,615.00 24,626.14 24,988.86 50.36 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 4,255.00 2,445.60 1,809.40 42.52 SOCIAL AGENCIES 16,500.00 17� 550.00- 3.33 - PROGRAM TOTALS 34 4,480.00 _9 919.0 X4,.460.93 34.17 X UPE401TURE CLASSIfICATIM.. PERSONAL SERVICES 276,320.00 175,399.42 100,920.58 36.52 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 77,810.00 55,942.10 21,867.90 28.10 COMMODITIES 5,500.00 3,542.96 1,957.04 35.58 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES „ 4,850,00 __L934 59 184.59- 3.80 - EXPENDITURE TOTALS ,i,64 480.00,.. 2,39.919,07 ?,?g4J60...93 34.17 % FUNDSSCUM OF GENERAL FUND 321,935.00 211,771.84 110,163.16 34.21 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND ---A2,545.00 28.147.23 14,397.77 33,84 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS x•480.00- 2,39.Q19.07 124.5_§Q.93 34.17 X VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 062 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT EXPEMDXTVRE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED BALANCE SALANCI ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 214,795.00 132,384.80 82,410.20 38.36 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 90,300.00 47,129.55 43,170.45 47.80 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT 13,440.00 11,881.25 1,558.75 11.59 COBB ADMINISTRATION 51,130.00 29,170.54 21,959.46 42.94 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 39,000,OD 39,002.12 2.12- .00 COBS ACCESSIBILITY i NEIGHBORH 60,000.00 .00 60.000.00 100.00 COBB RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATIO 1251100.00 101,603.50 23,496.50 18.78 CDBG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION 29,900.00 131.86 29,768.14 99,55 COBS MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITATI 10,000.00 1,144.95 8,855.05 88.55 CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS to Ow,00 .00 10,00O.QQ_ 100.00 PROGRAM TOTALS 643,665.00 342,44-57 ,A1,216,43 43.68 % EXPEMDXTVRE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 288,565.00 187,579.18 100,985.82 34.99 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 122,750.00 68,255.00 54,495.00 44.39 COMMODITIES 4,350.00 1,144.54 3,205.46 73.68 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 228,000.00 105.4#9.85 122,530.15 53.74 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 643,665.00 362,448.57 281,216.43 43.68 X SOURCE OF FUMDS GENERAL FUND 281,850.00 166,589.95 115„260.05 40.89 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT 325,130.00 171,052.97 154,077,03 47.38 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND _ _ 3¢s603.00- 24,$05,65 11,879.35 32.38 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 643.66.5.00 L {m; 57 �2 ,'j. igi,6.43 43.68 % V I L L A 6 E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 0 U 0 G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U K M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 071 STREET DIVISION fXPjKOITURf CLASSIFICATION 8 " ET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT P%?gRAN CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED BALANCE - 9ALANCI ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 683,445.00 439,108.11 244,336.89 35.75 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDING 379,565.00 230,006.63 149,558.37 39.40 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 167,300.00 138,528.04 28,771.96 17.19 STREET MAINTENANCE 1,746,295.00 1,271,932.25 474,362.75 27.16 SNOW REMOVAL 215,570.00 93,416.23 122,153.77 56.66 LEAF REMOVAL 83,985.00 81,006.50 2,978.50 3.54 STORM SEWER AND BASIN NAINTENA 130,305.00 100,197.30 30,107.70 23.10 FORESTRY 402,465.00 254,823.32 147,641.68 36.68 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 81,015.00 .37,979.78 43,035.22 53.12 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION 36,300.00 20,596.80 15,703.20 • 43.25 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS 50,605.00 11,039.57 39,565.43 78.18 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 430,185.00 335,826.28 94,358.72 21.93 POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 22,725.00 18,552.20 4,172.80 18.36 TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIGHT --162J-5545 �137-76955 44.85 PROGRAM TOTALS 4,736,985.00 3,202,368.46 1534,516J4 32.39 % fXPjKOITURf CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 1,496,435.00 964,677.11 531,757.89 35.53 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,106,400-00 772,803.34 333,596.66 30.15 COMMODITIES 467,350.00 249,050.78 218,299.22 46.71 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.666300.00 jjjja?,gL__jW_86?-77 3,467j1_ 27.05 EXPENDITURE TOTALS #_ZMMS � 00 3,202,368.46 ilujigzIL 32.39 % SOURCE OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 2,872,425.00 1,833,934.35 1,038,490.65 36.15 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 11399,000.00 981,793.00 417,217.00 29.92 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 230,460.00 155,118.92 75,341.08 32.69 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 232=0.00 _IZUg.jq 3,467j1_ 1.47 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 4,736,885.00 3,202,,368_46 1,234,516-54.. 32.39 % V I L L A G E O F M O U N T P R O S P E C T B U 0 G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 072 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION SOURCE OF FUNDS WATER i SEWER FUND ,j 1 �jOC $,6 2,239M5,14 34.18 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 6.552.430.00 44,,3,12JOC 6 2,239,$ 4. 34.1$ % BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT CLASSIFICATIONPROGRAM ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,620,445.00 1,272,756.06 347,686.94 21.45 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDING 61,425.00 32,148.82 29,276.18 47.66 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 49,985.00 31,183.64 18,801.36 37.61 WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE 9 REP 264,255.00 139,842.34 124,412.66 47.08 WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. i RE 337,520.00 154,975.97 182,544.03 54.08 WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT. 137,125.00 81,263.63 55,861.37 40.73 WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.i REPL 206,135.00 108,114.61 98,020.39 47.55 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE i OPERAT 357,720.00 260,140.47 97,579.53 27.27 SANITARY SEWER MAINT. i REPAIR 115,070.00 93,801.32 21,268.68 18.48 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 215,000.00 214,492.00 508.00 .23 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 100,000.00 2,547.00 97,453.00 97.45 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITIO 3.087,750.00 1,921,239 00 1.166,511.00 37.77 PROGRAM TOTALS 6,552.430.00 4,312.504.86 2,239.925.14 34.18 X EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 1,216,980.00 779,825.69 437,154.31 35.92 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,948,700.00 2,509,033.84 1,439,666.16 36.45 COMMODITIES 351,100.OD 171,924.45 179,175.55 51.03 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 444,900.00 261,600.96 183,299.04 41.20 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 590.750.00 $90.119,92 630.08 .10 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 6,552,430.00 4,312JO4.86 2,239.925.14 34.18 % SOURCE OF FUNDS WATER i SEWER FUND ,j 1 �jOC $,6 2,239M5,14 34.18 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 6.552.430.00 44,,3,12JOC 6 2,239,$ 4. 34.1$ % V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 5 P E C T 9 U D 6 E T E X P E N 0 1 T U R E S U H M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 073 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT gmago BALAMC9 SALAMCJ ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 60,375.00 42,752.69 17,622.31 29.18 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 157,610M 107,,610,17 49,222,$3 31.72 PROGRAM TOTALS 217,985,00 150.362.86 67,622,14 67,622J4 31.02 % gXPERPITYR9 CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 22,885.00 14,426.84 8,458.16 36.95 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 54,650.00 35,282.82 19,367.18 35.43 COMMODITIES 5,800.00 1,803.20 3,996.80 68.91 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 134,650,00 98,850.99 35,000-0.0 26.58 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 217M5,ffl 150,362.86 AZ_qg_,14 31.02 % SOURCE OF FUNDS PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 217,985,00 150.362M 67,,,66 14 31.02 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 217.985-00 150,362,86 67,622.14 31.02 % V I L L A G E O F N 0 U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U N N A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 075 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLMIF :ATION A14OUNT P RMANtr BALA SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 2.403,03S.00 QQ_ 2,403.035.00 100.00 PROGRAM TOTALS 2.403.035.00_ 00 2,.403.035,00 100.00 % C:ATJON PERSONAL SERVICES 56,885.00 .00 56,885.OD 100.00 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,254,200.00 .00 2,254,200.00 100.00 COMMODITIES 91,9,50,CQ. _ Q� .-..M..2N-'V 100.00 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2.403,035.00 00 2.403.035.00 100.00 X FUNDSSOURCE OF REFUSE DISPOSAL FUND 2.403.035.00, „_, _. QL 2.403.035.00 100.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 21_,403.035.00 00 2.403.035.00 100.00 X V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T B U D G E T E X P E N D I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 077 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS MENITURK CLASSIFICATIOP BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROG AM CLASSIFICATIONAMOUNT 204,800.00 EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRU 887,000.00 86,479.38 800,520.62 90.25 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 2,961,650.00 1,477,229.62 1,484,420.38 50.12 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 34,800.00 59,168.80 24,368.80- 70.02- POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONSTRUCT 4,650,000.00 724,399.33 3,925,600:67 84.42 GENERAL EQUIP 9 IMPRVMNTS 1,450,000.00 15,163.67 1,434,836.33 98.95 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL 528,500.00 24 ,46� 1.42 13.038158 2.33 PROGRAM TOTALS 10.541,950.00 2.907.902.22 7.634.047.78 72.41 X MENITURK CLASSIFICATIOP CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 204,800.00 38,003.36 166,7%.64 81.44 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9,947,650.00 2,766,032.31 7,181,617.69 72.19 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 389,500 W 103,866.55 285,(Li3-45 73.33 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 1Q,541.950.00 2.907,902.22 3,675,600.67 72.41 X F VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 558,500.W 545,461.42 13,038.58 2.33 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 1,484,800.00 74,332.47 1,410,467.53 94.99 POLICE i FIRE BLOC CONST FUND 250,000.00 .00 250,000.00 100.00 POLICE i FIRE BOND PROCEEDS 4,400,000.00 724,399.33 3,675,600.67 83.53 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 .00 904.27 904.27- .00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPNT CONST 1991 887,000.W 85,575.11 801,424.89 90.35 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 2.961.650.00 1.477.229.62 J,,4$ 4 ,Sfl 50.12 SOURCE OF FUNS TOTALS 10,541.950.00 2.907.902.22 7.634,047.78 72.41 X V I L L A G E -0 F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T BUDGET EXPENDITURE SUMMARY 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 081 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 16,280.00 16,151.23 128.77 .79 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,700.00 70,339.29 360.71 .51 COMMODITIES 12.500.QO 5,904.25 X595.7,5_ 52.76 EXPENDITURE TOTALS - 99.400,0D7,005.23 7•QQS•13 7.12 X SOURCE OF FtAW GENERAL FUND 99-480M- 92.394.77 7.085.23 7.12 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 99.480.00 92.394.77 _ LOOM 7.12 % BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT P S FY P COMMUNITY GROUPS 42,700.00 44,082.88 1,382.88- 3.23 - 4TH OF JULY i CIVIC EVENTS, ET 41,600.00 36,690.47 4,909.53 - 11.80 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 15.180.00 11.621.42 3, x$.58 23.44 PROGRAM TOTALS ..., 99,`480.00_,,2 3,x,4.77 7.12 X EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PERSONAL SERVICES 16,280.00 16,151.23 128.77 .79 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 70,700.00 70,339.29 360.71 .51 COMMODITIES 12.500.QO 5,904.25 X595.7,5_ 52.76 EXPENDITURE TOTALS - 99.400,0D7,005.23 7•QQS•13 7.12 X SOURCE OF FtAW GENERAL FUND 99-480M- 92.394.77 7.085.23 7.12 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 99.480.00 92.394.77 _ LOOM 7.12 % V I L L A G E 0 F K 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 8 U D G E T E X P E N 0 1 T U R i S U N M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 092 LIBRARY SERVICES . BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED BALANCE BALANCE LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2,823,6WOO LO 2,823,655.00 100.00 PROGRAM TOTALS 2,823,655.00 '00 2,823,655.00 100.00 z EVWI TRE ,$SIFICATIgM UCLA LIBRARY OPERATIONS Do 21423,655 .00, 100.00 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 2,$23,655.00 .00 2,823,655.00 100.00 % JWCV OF FUNDS LIBRARY FUND 2.823.655100 100.00 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 2,023,655,00 QQ 2,823,655.00 100.00 x V I L L A G E O F M 0 U N T P R O S P E C T 8 U 0 G E T E X P E N 0 I T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 091 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS CLASSIFICATION. DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1,553,9,85 , 1.502,480.15 5a X04 Bs 3.31 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 11 55�K 1.502.480.15 5 x5 4.$5_ 3.31 % SOURCE OF FUNDS BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PROGRAM W.$$IFICATIONARAWM 43,725.00 25,506.11 18,218.89 41.66 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 1,468,995.00 1,417,492.65 51,502.35 3.50 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS 84;990.00 84:987.50 2.50 .00 PROGRAM TOTALS 1,553.Q5 I_NL 480,15 51,504.85 3.31 X CLASSIFICATION. DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1,553,9,85 , 1.502,480.15 5a X04 Bs 3.31 EXPENDITURE TOTALS 11 55�K 1.502.480.15 5 x5 4.$5_ 3.31 % SOURCE OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 43,725.00 25,506.11 18,218.89 41.66 CORPORATE PURPOSES B i I 1973 163,250.00 163,394.40 144.40- DB - CORPORATE PURPOSES B i 1 1974 258,000.00 257,940.00 60.00 .02 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B i I 23,450.00 23,450.00 .00 .00 SSA #2 BLACKHAWK B i I 27,250.00 27,250.00 .00 .00 POLICE i FIRE BUILDING 8 i I 143,515.00 142,370.58 1,144.42 .79 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 i I 1991 49,000.00 19,109.97 29,890.03 61.00 INSURANCE RESERVE B i I 102,990.00 102,987.50 2.50 .00 FLOOD CONTROL 8 i 1 1991 103,305.00 102,041.07 1,263.93 1.22 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B i 1 19870 114,375.00 113,872.50 502.50 .43 P W FACILITY B i I 19878 371,190.00 370,625.00 565.00 .15 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B i 11987C 119,645.00 119,645.52 .52- .00 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B i I 34,290.00 34.287.50 2.50 .00 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS' 1.553,985.00 1,502.480.15 51.504,185 3.31 % V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0 S P E C T 9 U D C. E T E X P E N 0 1 T U R E S U M M A R Y 5/01/91 - 12/31/91 092 PENSION FUNDS EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION BUDGET AMOUNT BUDGET PERCENT PR QG RAN CLASSIFICATION AMOUNT EXPENDED BALAK - I B -A LW EMPLOYEE PENSIONS 36,600.00 24,400.40 12,199.60 33.33 POLICE PENSIONS 543,000.00 330,071.73 212,928.27 39.21 FIREMEN$ PENSIONS 578,000.99 350,005A ?21,994.12 38.40 PROGRAM TOTALS 1. 15 7�-MAM-21- 710.478�gl 447,121.99 38.62 % EXPENDITURE CLASSIFICATION PENSION EXPENSE 157,600, DO -21219i01- 447.1?1,99 38.62 EXPENDITURE TOTALS I157,600.00 710478.01 447,121.99 38.62 % SOUPSE OF FUNDS GENERAL FUND 10,600.00 7,065.76 3,534.24 33.34 BENEFIT TRUST #2 26,000.00 17,334.64 8,665.36 33.32 POLICE PENSION FUND 543,000.00 330,071.73 212,928.27 39.21 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 578,000.00 356,095M 221,994.12 38.40 SOURCE OF FUNDS TOTALS 1.157,600.00 710.478�gl 447,121,99 38.62 % ,An 6uippnq gig aidood aJow 000`ZL sueaw aseaJout jo Mod abelua3Jad AJ8A3 -sllaq Alajes Jta41 team slswolow stoulll1 jo $1 S AtluaJJn3 'AUuad AJaAa gljom SBM uollowoJd stgi 'lJOM of uaAOJd uaaq aAe4 Jagja6ol SaAlIU93Ul DUB lUatua:IJojUa `UotlBof W--sllao Ames J1a41 JeaM of aldoad 6utlla6 ut 4oBOJdde 34WI= UP patJl OA94 SOMAN A PQ QM. `ptBs uosutgolj stol `JolaaJlO WLILI903 'slstjop I Awl a410l jl2tpq s,uotltleo3 24l uo spJeMe qm a41 luaSaJd lllM slapil 6uluulM a4l paingpjslp gol4M luawlJBdap 83110d 4393 '6utmeJp a41 olul poialua aq Ol aotjjo uolllleo3 24l of sla:pll Jla4l lugs ua4l M1 Jolow 841 sllaq A;ajBs Jta4l 6utJBaM paAJasgo A241 slslJolow of sl2�1011241 aAe6 sJaotjjo 2Otlod -Jagwaoaa 6utJnp sluawlJedap aatlod ZS l Ol sla'ptl ballot 000'09 painglJlW uoil!l2O3 241 (luawlJedaa aallod eJol j) eJOI j jO tl2a.0 aauaAto (luawlJedaa aollod uol6uLwOo19) u016Ul UJOolg jo stJJON uletlllM (luawlJsdaa silpatlg Aluno3 al9l) 8AOJ0 6utJdg p uB6lJJoo 1MS (1U8w4J8(laa 23llOd JOOJ9 JeO) elA2le9 JO 2l43OuU003W u4W :Aq UDM aJaM Saztjd 4m OSZ$ Jno3 !i< (lugu4 2011Od laadsoJd 'lW oadsOJd `lW jO !}Is W 'sJW (luawlJBdaa aotlod 324O1SP43) Jassag JO 20SP219 ATia9 :Aq Uom aJaM saztJd qm OOS$ om 1 'asn ita9 Alam Joj uotlltwo stoutlll 241 jo a3wo 241 le u#aJp siant AJallol do 2ljOn9 AepgOH a4l jo sJauuLm AePO1--Z661 '11 AJBnuar -- platj6updS 3SH313b 31Vla3WWI d03 99Z9 -969/11Z 2sn 1129 A42JUS Joj Uol1l1BO3 stoutlll uosulgoa slol :loeluo3 uosuigob siol JO;1aJlp aAhmax3 8SZ8-869 (GtZ) * ZOGZ9 stau?ItI'PlagSuudS auuZ suYuB 6IZ geld 41a IaRS JOI U001411'euD S The Coalition for Safety Belt Use is a not-for-profit organization whose member groups come from the fields of medicine and public health, law enforcement and safety education, business and industry, and community service. It is funded by a grant from Traffic Safety Now, Inc., a motor vehicle manufacturers safety group. At the end of January the Coalition's grant will expire so it will close its doors. However, its members will continue to encourage travellers in Illinois to develop the life-saving buckle up habit. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 13, 1992 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR A CLASS S LIQUOR LICENSE FOR RETRO BISTRO, INC., 1744 WEST GOLF ROAD I met with Mr. Dominique Legeai and Mr. Masato Suzuki who are each 50% owners of the new restaurant venture which wishes to open in the Prospect Commons Shopping Center at Goff and Busse Roads. These two gentlemen have been together since the late 1970s and worked at LeTfti de Paris Restaurant for ten years before opening their first restaurant, D & J Bistro in Lake Zurich. The atmosphere of the restaurant in Lake Zurich, which will be similar to the one they are proposing for Mount Prospect, is a Country French restaurant. It is good quality food, an upgrade from the vast majority of our restaurants in town, at what they have indicated is a reasonable price. If you would wish to see the type of operation, D & J Bistro is located in the First Bank Plaza on Rand Road in Lake Zurich. I asked the gentlemen why they picked Mount Prospect and, particularly, this location. They informed me they did a survey of their patrons at the Lake Zurich restaurant and found that 25% of their patrons come from the area near or in Mount Prospect and that the intersection of Goff and Busse was a very high visible intersection for a good percentage of the patrons they already have. They felt it was time for them to expand into another area and that they would take three spaces in the shopping center on the north side between the Wild Life Arts place and the inside corner property leaving one blank space on either side of them. What is interesting is that the location in Lake Zurich has a similar establishment next store as the Wild Ufa Art. They are anticipating having seating capacity for 75 patrons and a small lounge area for wafting. The restaurant in Lake Zurich does get booked completely and has people waiting for tables. It appears to be a very popular restaurant and has done very well. They would anticipate new construction of the interior of the space and open in April. Their hours would be 11:30 a.m. to 9:30 p.m., Monday through Thursday, 11:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m., Friday and Saturday and closed on Sundays. They do not have fixed seating but open seating in their restaurants. The decor would be an art deco. The present restaurant in Lake Zurich has a very good reputation and there have not been any problems. I have eaten at that restaurant two times in the past and found the service and quality of food to be extraordinary. I feel very strongly they can operate the kind of restaurant establishment that would fit very well in the upper level of restaurants in the Village. JOHN FULTON DIXON JFD/rcc attachment Y_1J,L_A..GE OF MOUNT PF0tt(- I CQOK COL " ' ILLINOIS I 1L LIOU COMMISSt N �, I ,LICENS RENEWAL, DATE Jan. 3, 1992 NEW xx (S1S0 Non-Refundable Application Fee for issuance of new Liquor License; one-time only fee) Honorable Gerald L Farley, Village President and Local Liquor Control Commissioner Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois; The undersigned, Retro Bistro Inc. hereby makes application for a Class s liquor dealer's license or the period ending April 30, 19 9 2, and tenders the sum of 3 2, 5 0 0.0 0 , the prescribed fee as set forth in the meowing: SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106): Annual Fee CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00 CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00 CLASS C: Retail package only 2,000•00 CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00 CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000•00 CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine; limited number of special events to include full service bar facilities; consumption on premises only 00.00 CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00 CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges; retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00 CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non- refrigerated beer and wine only - no consumption on premises 1,750.00 CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,000.00 CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge 2,500.00 CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00 CLASS V: Retail package - wine only 1,500.00 CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only and at dining tables only 1,500.00 SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00 EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL.. Your petitioner, Retro Bistro Inc. , doing business as , respectfully requests permtssion to operate a reig liquor bustness at mount pros t cotrnons plaza , Mount Prospect, Illinois. 1744 W Golf Road Mt. Prospect, Illinois Description and name or premises: 3,630 sq. ft. Rest.urant with lounge in the Mt. Prospect Commons Plaza - facing Golf Road (Description must bi—complete as to floor area, frontage, etc.) Is applicant owner of premises: No If not owner, does applicant have a lease? Yes State date applicant's lease expires, 12Z16Z01 — If not owner, attach copy of lease hereto. Does applicant have a management contract with another person or entity for the operation or management of the licensed premises? No If so, state the name and address of the manager or management company. . (The manager or management company must complete the same application as the owner). Is applicant an individual qSqTLration, a co -partnership or an association? (Circle one) If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number. If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof: If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership: If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: Illinois - 12/5Z91 If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois: If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social Security Numbers of Officers and Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such corporation. OFFICE AND/OR PERCENT OF NAME Al2DRES STOCK HELD Dominique Legeai 322 Devonshire, Tower Lakes, Il. 60010 President - 500 Date of Birth: 1-3-47 Social Security # 340-46-5194 — Phone # (708) 526-8735 Masato Suzuki 14 Aspen Dr.,Vernon Hills, Il. 60061 Sec.-Treas. 50% Date of Birth: 11-5-51 Social Security # 351-58-0299 Phone # (708) 367-1294 Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone # (Additional information to be included on aseparate listing.) Objects for which organiz-- on is formed Restaurant If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? No If so, explain: ff applicant is an individual, state age: Marital status: Is applicant a citizen of the United States? If a naturalized, citizen, state date and place of naturalization: How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to the filing of this application? Local address: 'Telephone no. State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: Restaurant/Lounge State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time: -o- How long has applicant been in this business? hasn't started Is the applicant an elected public official? No If so, state the particulars thereof: Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public official? No In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any political contributions within the past 2 years? If so, state the particulars thereof. Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? No If so, designate title: Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp? No if so, state the Teasons therefor Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? No If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s): Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premises other than described in this application? No If so, state disposition of such application: Is applicant qualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor business? Yes Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal government or by any state or subdivision thereof? No If so, explain: Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? No Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the conduct of his/her place of business? Yes iiiii nave coverage proviaed Does applicant current'-- -arry Dram Shop Insurance covera--? If 'Yes,* attach copy. If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? (If the answer to either of the foregoing questions is "No," no license shall issue. Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the time of filing? V%W Wo State name and address of each surety next below: Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application is made: Dominique Legeai (see Page 2) SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT Retro -Bistro, Inc. by: Dominique Leqeai Corporate Seal (If applicant is corporation) Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that he is/are the applicant(s) for the license requested in the foregoing application; that e_ is/are of good repute, character and standing and that answers to the questions asked in the foregoing application are true and correct in every detail. STATE OF ILLINOIS SS. COUNTY OF COOK Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 3rd day of January AD., 19 92 -------------- "OFFMIAL SW JM "Is F. MWWficks, Jr. "ry Pubk a& 6f Min* MY COMMMM ft" 5/11!95 I -- -_ A ------ I APPLICATION APPROVED; No tarOUNC James F. Hen�icks, Jr. E5c-@ Liquor Control i5;mmmioner VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois ►Yy I 1'. � -T TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: December 13, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-76-V-91, John & Marie Traficanto LOCATION: 418 South Emerson Street The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variation application filed by John & Marie Traficanto. The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a side yard setback of 1.7' to accommodate an existing deck. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of December 12, 1991. At the meeting, Marie Traficanto presented testimony in support of the request. She explained that they entrusted their contractor with the task of obtaining the permit and were not aware that the permit was never issued until after the deck was constructed. She also stated that they are willing to work with staff on creating an acceptable drainage swale along the north property line. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the variation would allow the deck to remain as constructed, 1.7' from the side property line. She noted that the neighbor has a 5' evergreen hedge which effectively screens the deck from the neighbor. She also noted that the deck is low to the ground, which further minimised its impact. She stated that a drainage swale must be created along the north side yard as requested by Engineering. The ZBA generally discussed the request, noting the circumstances and that the deck is attractive and adequately screened from the neighbor. Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a variation to allow a 1.7' side yard to accommodate an existing deck. JF:cl I V 1 0 T or z� urvey OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: Lot 10 in Block I in Prospect Highlands Subdivision, of that Westerly 379.4 feetof the East Half of the North 60 rods of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois. 156' 0 DUNDEE ENGINEERING (312)428-2929 Dundee. Illinois Scale: I "= 20' Ordered: Leonard 'Petrucelli Owner: Page: c'_11 -19F Job: -ZULU&4- S HA - BONEE TR z Q' V) Cie III STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY Of SANE as 11-17-28 aherc*rtif .. ......... b y that I h&v* surveyed � W , 0FIL411% ovaeby described property and that the pthe 0 annexed correctly represents said `-*: 0 �r." " au-�*m .1 PHILIP % WHITE'OU)SE a 6 No 35 15% Illinois Land Surveyor 135-1596 WOUL KI V?<4v VV77') A4 t4 Ot55 v4 "7 'P' 4. Ak 004. PECTION 7) '-fO--NINGG S RUCTU.:i!-,. ELECTRO - P L -------------------------------- too$ =06--7— rn c m $to —4 rn MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 76-V-91 PETTITONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: Hearing Date: December 12, 1991 John and Marie Traficanto 418 South Emerson Street November 26, 1991 Variation to Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a side yard setback of 1.7 ft. for an existing deck. Code requires a 4.4 ft. side setback Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Dennis Saviano Michaele Skowron None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a sideyard setback of 1.7 ft. for an existing deck. Code requires a 4.4 ft. sideyard. The petitioner, Marie Traficanto, 418 South Emerson Street, presented her case stating that they hired a contractor to build a deck and trusted him to get the permit. After the deck was built, they found out that the contractor never obtained the permit. In addition, the contractor did not build the deck according to the plan approved during the permit review by staff. They are seeking the variation to keep the deck as constructed rather than cut it back to meet the sideyard requirement. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, explained that the contractor submitted plans for the deck and applied for a permit. He was told that the deck must be set back 4.4 ft from the lot line. Subsequently, the plan was modified and the permit approved by staff. However, the contractor never picked up the permit and built the deck according to his original plan. Ms. Farnham noted that a 5 ft. evergreen hedge along the ty properline screens the deck from the neighbor. She also indicated that Engineering q *j e"s chat a drainage Swale be maintained in the 1»7 ft. sideyarei to accommodate the u r requests natural drainage pattern Ms. Farnham discussed this with the applicant who indicated that they ho below the ZBA-76-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Cassidy questioned the flooding potential on the neighbor's property, if this area were paved. Ms. Farnham stated that the swale could be constructed out of pavers without increasing run-off to the neighbor's lot. Chairman Basnik asked the petitioner if they were willing to construct the swale. Mrs. Traficanto stated that they will work with Village staff to create a Swale as necessary. Mrs. Skowron asked if staffs suggestion of planting grass in the 1.7 ft. sideyard wouldn't create a maintenance problem since it is too narrow for a lawn mower. Ms. Farnham stated that she believes pavers were a good idea in this location. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioner's request for a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 1.7 ft. sideyard subject to the petitioner working with staff on creating a drainage swale in the sideyard. Mr. Cassidy moved; seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call; AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 7-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. / f Jul% Farnham, Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MaUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: JULIE FARNHAM, PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-76-V-91 APPLICANT: JOHN AND MARIE TRAFICANTO ADDRESS: 418 SOUTH EMERSON STREET LOCATION MAP: I PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 501 x 1561 (7,800 sq. ft.) % COVERAGE: 32% F.A.R. : N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is request;ng a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a side yard setback of 1.7 ft. for an existing deck. Code requires a 4.4 ft. side setback. W1 R Summary of application: The applicants hired a contractor to construct a deck and entrusted him with the responsibility of obtaining the necessary permits. The contractor applied for a permit, and was told that the deck must be set back to line up with the north wall of the garage. Subsequently, the plan was modified to allow a 5 ft. side setback and the permit application was approved. However, the contractor never picked up the permit, but proceeded to construct the deck according to the original plan. Because the permit was never issued, no inspections were scheduled and the error was not detected by the applicant until after the deck was constructed. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The deck was built in line with a sidewalk along the side of the garage. An evergreen hedge approximately 5 ft. tall exists along the neighbor's property line. The hedge extends the length of the deck thereby screening it from the neighbors. The neighbors house does have some windows facing the deck, but the hedge effectively screens from view the portion of the deck that encroaches into the sideyard. Staff's primary concern is how this narrow space will be maintained. It should be planted so it doesn't become a muddy swale. Staff notes that lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.' Engineering and Inspection Services note that fill has been placed between the deck and the hedge which alters the natural drainage pattern. A swale should be established to direct drainage to the rear yard. In addition, a building permit must be obtained after -the -fact for the deck. No other concerns were expressed by other Village staff. Al OUCIIIJIMUA Staff recommends approval of this request noting that the portion of the deck that encroaches into the sideyard is relatively low to the ground and is adequately screened from the neighbor by a 5 ft. tall evergreen hedge. Staff does request that the swale between the deck and the hedge be planted with grass or other suitable ground cover to eliminate erosion and muddy conditions. JF:hg Approved: David M. Clements, Directo CAF 1/15/92 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 418SOUTH EME , RSON STREET WHEREAS, John P. and Marie A. Traficanto (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 418 South Emerson Street (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 10 in Block 1 in Prospect Highlands Subdivision, of that westerly 379.4 feet of the east half of the north 60 rods of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a side yard setback of 1.7 feet for an existing deck; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 76-V-91 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 12th day of December, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Moupt Progt Herald on the 26th day of November, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variation being the subject of ZBA 76-V-91 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a 1.7 foot side yard setback for an existing deck. SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction L, ZBA 76-V-91 Page 2 of 2 begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. �TjON_,,SThis Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk V .LAGS OF MOUNT PROSPEk--ii PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: JANUARY 16, 1992 SUBJECT: WAL-MART - OUTDOOR STORAGE At the January 7 Village Board meeting, there was discussion about the temporary outdoor storage of baled cardboard at Wal-Mart. I have talked with Store Manager Richard Henry and he advises me that operations personnel from Wal-Mart are examining the situation, and will propose a fenced enclosure for these bales. Also, Mr. Henry has been advised to talk with Arc Disposal about their cardboard recycling program. Mr. Henry will have an update on this at the January 21 Village Board meeting. Concerning the Special Use Ordinance, the antenna is already installed. Wal-Mart will install the required screening after the ordinance is approved. Staff would recommend that the Board proceed with the ordinance approval, so the required screening can be installed. Staff will continue working with Wal-Mart on the method and timing for the cardboard bales. DMC:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER NyL FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-77-SU-91, WAL-MART STORES, INC. LOCATION: 930 EAST MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a Special Use Permit application filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a 5'-10" diameter satellite antenna on the roof of the new Wal-Mart Store in Mount Prospect Plaza. Satellite antennas with diameters larger than 49' are only permitted as a special use. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of December 12, 1991. At the meeting Mark Courtney, Architect for Wal-Mart, presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Courtney explained that the Wal-Mart utilizes satellite antennas for their system of nationwide monitoring of merchandise and for security and fire alarm purposes. He noted that the antenna should not interfere with other television reception in the area. He also stated that Wal-Mart would prefer not to retrofit a screening device on the roof as it would require puncturing the roof structure which could cause leakage problems. He further stated that the screening device may be more noticeable than the antenna itself. However, if necessary, screening would be provided. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the Y-10" antenna has been installed on the roof and noted that this request is very similar to one granted for Walgreen's in Mount Prospect Plaza a few months ago. She noted that the antenna complies with most of the special use standards listed in the ordinance. However, it should be screened on the north side. She suggested that a screening box similar to what Walgreen's proposed would provide adequate screening. Two residents expressed some concerns about potential interference with television reception but stated that they had not experienced any problems. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and the screening requirements. Several members stated that the screening requirements are clearly established in the ordinance and since others have had to abide by them, Wal-Mart should too. It was also noted that there are several satellite antennas in the area which have not created any apparent problems with local television reception. John Fulton Dixon December 16, 1991 Page 2 Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a Special Use Permit to allow a 5',10" diameter satellite antenna on the roof of Wal-Mart conditioned on: Screening the antenna per ordinance requirements and staff approval. DMC:hg Satellite Dish Antenna I MOM PES2.490 I I Figure 4. Prodelin 1.8M Quick Repoint Antenna Cable Routing GROUND WIRE TIE -WRAP CABLE To FEED SUPPORT ARM LL vs TIE -WRAP fUj ALLOW LOOP POINT IN CABLE TO, AVOID STRAIN ON CONNECTOR LEVEL WITH ANTENNA LOWEST POINT WHEN ANTENNA IS VERTICAL ALLOW AOECUA72 SLACK FOR EILSVATICN ANO AZIMUTH CHANGES MOM PES2.490 I I Figure 4. Prodelin 1.8M Quick Repoint Antenna Cable Routing I. 1z1TI; �LTiG'N l.a�kir�(6 �T �- �� g �_ - �_a°�� _ _ --- — � 2, hiT� �,yT�oN �KINto N�RTr� ' �` —__ �� n �u --�-- -- t= _ � .�. iA� 4E16 crit MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 77 -SU -91 PETTITONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: December 12, 1991 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 930 East Mount Prospect Plaza November 26, 1991 Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to install a Y-10"diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Dennis Saviano Michaele Skowron None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane Cliff Wesa, 109 North Louis Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to install a Y-10" diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna at Wal-Mart in Mount Prospect Plaza. MarkCourtney, B.S.W. Architects, Tulsa, Oklahoma, representing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. presented his case stating that during the permitting process for building construction, Wal- Mart inadvertently failed to get a separate permit for the satellite antenna which the Village requires. He stated that all Wal-Mart Stores utilize satellite antennas for monitoring merchandise, security and fire alarm systems. The special use permit is requested to allow the antenna to remain as installed. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that a Y-10" diameter satellite antenna was installed on the roof of the new Wal-Mart Store and a Special Use Permit is required because it is larger than 49' in diameter. She stated that this request is very similar to one recently reviewed and approved for Walgreens in Mount Prospect Plaza. She explained that this antenna meets all of the Special Use standards listed in the Ordinance for roof -mounted satellite antennas except with regard to screening. She noted that the building parapet walls screen the antenna from three sides, but the antenna is visible from the adjacent property to the north (Thunderbird Lanes). Staff requests that the ZBA-77-SU-91 December 12, 1991 Page 2 of 3 antenna be screened to comply with the Ordinance requirements. Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane stated that he wanted to go on record to express concern about the storage of many bales of cardboard boxes behind Wal-Mart. He stated that this is a fire hazard and is not in keeping with the strong values and ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect. He stated that he spoke with the Store Manager in this regard. He also contacted the Village Manager and Fire Chief Cavello. Chairman Basnik stated that the Zoning Board appreciates his concern but has no jurisdiction over such matters. Cliff Wesa, 109 North Louis asked why so many satellite antennas are allowed for businesses but not for residents. Julie Farnham explained that the regulations on satellite antennas are the same in all zoning districts. Antennas under 40" in diameter are permitted, but any larger antenna would only be permitted as a Special Use which would require the public hearing process. Mr. Wesa also expressed concern about the impact on TV transmission in the area. Mr. Basnik noted that this antenna is currently operating in addition to others in the area. He asked if Mr. Wesa has experienced any problems to date. If he hasn't had problems yet, he shouldn't in the future. Mr. Wesa sated that he has not had problems. Mr. Courtney responded to staffs recommendation for screening stating that the dish is relatively small and that a screening box as suggested by staff might be more visually obtrusive. He also stated that it would be necessary to penetrate the roof to construct the screening device. This could lead to problems with roof leaks. Mr. Basnik stated that he was inclined to agree that the screening device might be more visible than the antenna itself. Mr. Lannon stated that Walgreens was required to screen their antenna and so should Wal- Mart. The Ordinance is very clear on screening requirements and these should be adhered to for all applicants. Mr. Saviano asked how many stores with satellite antennas Wal-Mart has, and whether they are screened, and if there have, been problems reported with regard to interference with TV transmission. Mr. Courtney stated that there are about 1,700 stores nationwide and he is not aware of any interference problems. He stated that some stores have screened their satellite antennas but usually with the building parapet walls. ZBA-77-SU-91 December 12, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Mr. Lannon noted that most of the stores are in rural locations and may not be subject to screening requirements. Only recently has Wal-Mart begun to move into suburban locations where appearance is more important. Mr. Cassidy stated that the specifics on frequency are not the main concern of the Zoning Board, but appearance is. He believes the antenna should be screened for aesthetic and consistency reasons. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioner's request for a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to allow a 5'-10" roof -mounted satellite antenna at Wal- Mart in Mount Prospect Plaza subject to screening per staff approval. Mrs. Skowron moved, Mr. Pratt seconded. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 7-0 This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Julie Farnham, Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOM PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: JULIE FARNHAM, PLANNER DATE: DECEMBER 2, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-77-SU-91 APPLICANT: WAL-MART STORES,INC. ADDRESS: 930 EAST MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: B-3 Business Commercial LOT SIZE: N/A % COVERAGE: N/A F.A.R.: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesing a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to install a 5'- 10" diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna. INFXIMR0.1, Summary of application: The applicant installed a 5'-10" diameter satellite antenna on the roof of the new Wal-Mart Store in Mount Prospect Plaza. A separate permit was never obtained for the antenna and a special use permit is requested to allow the antenna to remain as installed. The applicant states that the satellite antenna is essential for store operation, communication, security and fire safety. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Wal-Mart was recently constructed in the Phase II area of Mount Prospect Plaza. Staff notes that a similar sized roof -mounted antenna was recently approved for Walgreens. While most of the surrounding properties are commercial, Centennial Apartments, a high-rise senior apartment complex abuts the northeast corner of the Wal-Mart property. Staff's primary concern with this request is the view of the satellite antenna by residents of upper floor apartments. The proposed satellite antenna meets most of the standards for non -ground mounted antennas as follows: 1. The antenna is located on the roof above the Wal-Mart Store to which it is an accessory. 2. The proposed 5'-10" diameter antenna is less than 1/3 the height of the building (22 building height X 33% = 7.26). 3. The overall height including the antenna and the building will be 24 ft. Code allows a maximum building height of 30 ft. 4. The antenna will be at least 20 ft. from all property lines. 5. The antenna and screening will be in scale with the building. The applicant states that the antenna will be screened from pedestrian view by parapet walls on three sides of the building. Staff notes that the antenna is visible from the parking lot of Thunderbird Lanes. According to the special use standards, the antenna must be screened from view from adjacent properties at grade level. Staff' requests that screening be provided on all sides of the antenna to comply with this standard. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 QMR VILLAGE STAEE COMMENIS No objections were expressed by other Village staff. S13DIARYIEECOMMENDATTO This request is very similar to one recently approved for Walgreens in Mount Prospect Plaza. Staff recommends approval of the request noting that the standards for a roof - mounted antenna have been met except screening. As such, staff recommends that approval be conditioned on providing screening around the satellite antenna. JF:,hg Approved: &M. �1� David M. Clements, Director CAF/ 1/14/92 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS WAL-MART LOCATED AT 930 EAST M AZA __O QUNT PROSPECT PT WHEREAS, Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property located at 930 East Mount Prospect Plaza (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: That part of Lot 1 (excepting therefrom those parts thereof taken for the Department of Transportation by condemnation registered as Document Number 3201616) ; also (excepting therefrom that part thereof taken for Centennial Subdivision by plat registered as Document Number 3202476) in Plaza Subdivision, being a Subdivision of part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on July 16, 1979, as Document Number 3104778; described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 1; thence south 29 degrees 46 minutes 10 seconds east along the Southwesterly line of said Lot 1, being also the Northeasterly right-of-way line of Rand Road as dedicated by Document Number 4104778, a distance of 296.41 (Record = 297.66) feet to a point of curvature; thence continuing Southeasterly along said Southwesterly line on a tangential curve, concave to the Northeast, having a radius of 2,072.46 feet, for an arc distance of 730 feet; thence North 20 degrees 56 minutes 31 seconds East, 615.26 feet to the Southwest corner of Centennial Subdivision,, according to the plat thereof recorded February 11, 1981 as Document Number 3202476; thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes 30 seconds East along the West line of Centennial Subdivision aforesaid, 234.66 feet to a point on the North line of said Lot I in Plaza Subdivision; thence North 89 degrees 39 minutes 13 seconds West along said North line, 832.35 (Record = 832.55) feet to the point of beginning and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use to permit installation of a roof (non -ground) mounted satellite antenna, as provided in Section 14.1701.C.5; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use, being the subject of ZBA 77 -SU -91, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 12th day of December, 1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 26th day of November, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 77 -SU -91; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Eli ZBA 77 -SU -91 Page 2 of 2 Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that granting the Special Use requested in ZBA 77 -SU -91 would be in the best interest of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Special Use to the subject property to permit a 50 loll diameter roof mounted satellite antenna, as provided in Section 14.1701.C.5, subjext to installation of required screening. SECTION THREE; This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk 1992. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOLT F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-79-V-91, RAY NAEGELE LOCATION: 2016 EAST EUCLID The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variation applicaiton filed by Ray Naegele. The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking at 2016 East Euclid Avenue: 1. Section 14.2102.13 to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. Code requires 10 ft. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line. Code requires 20 ft. 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front and side lot lines. Code requires 30 ft. and 10 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line -Code requires 20 ft. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than 75% as allowed by Code. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 12, 1991. At the meeting, Cary Chickerneo, Attorney for the applicant, presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Chickerneo explained that this is a very difficult site to develop due to it small size and shape. Variations are needed to create an economically viable development. He stated that in order to attract a video franchise they needed to provide about 5,000 square feet of space. He further described the specific variations proposed. Julie Farnham, Planner, agreed that this is a difficult site to develop and stated that staff believes the proposed single use retail store is one of the best .proposals staff has seen for this site. She explained that staff has some concerns about substantially reducing the required yards, particularly adjacent to residential property. While yard variations are necessary to develop this site, the impact on adjacent residential property should be minimized. She presented a modified plan staff developed that would create a 5 ft. building setback on the east, 20 ft. rear setback to the north and provide 20 parking spaces as required by Code. She explained that the major drawback was that the building size would be reduced to approximately 4,080 square feet. Also presenting testimony in support of the request were, Warren Kostak, Architect for the applicant, and Ray Naegele, applicant and property owner. Mr. Kostak provided John Fulton Dixon Page 2 December 16, 1991 information relative to the design and appearance of the building. Mr. Naegele stated that he intends to use the space for a video store. He also has concerns about the impact on the residential, and believes the proposed use and site plan are sensitive to the surroundings. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request and its potential impact on surrounding residents. Members concurred that this is one of the best plans for this site, noting that the site constraints presented a hardship for development. Concerns were expressed about the larger variations requested and discussion ensued about potential areas of compromise between the applicants and staffs recommended plan. Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and parking at 2016 East Euclid Avenue.: 1. Section 14.2102.E to allow a 5 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 15 ft. building setback from the rear property line. 3. Section 14.2102E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front (south) and side (east) lot lines, and 10 ft. from the side (west) lot. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow a maximum of 78%. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property tine as shown on the submitted site plan. 2. Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings. 3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground. 4. Any security lighting which faces residential property consist of cut-off fixtures (down - lighting). 5. No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building. 6. continuous hedge to be planted along the north property line to provide solid screening adjacent to residential property. JF:hg lHIS SOL10 0000 FSNGt R -I DISTRICT R -I DISTRICT 01i1TNY0. 00 SITE PLAN ® EUCLID AVENUE Al" 4 > _ FRONT EI EVAT!ON f. ® m lxuT€NO OMt ETOIIY •UILDIND I-1 DISTRICT] SUMMARY OF ZONING VARIANCES ITSY .TOGO. ".1"M lEfiTSON OITEAR YARD 1i.110E. D. ]� `W OMR%IND SlTSAC% fa.31t].l R?W LIMI MY �] SIO! YAAO PAR%IND 1{.]IS].t EE 1RDY It REtIDlNTIAI SIDE YARD lDYDIND Il.]f0].• f0 SDILDItp O ] MOMtTY GENERAL ZONING DATA ITEM CO" 0#01]X110 SECTIN EY GOO! LOT SIZE "OOR ,AREA RAY€O X10 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 79-V-91 Hearing Date: December 12, 1991 PETI'T'IONER: Ray Naegele SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2016 East Euclid PUBLICATION DATE: November 26, 1991 REQUEST: The following variations are requested to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking: 1) Section 14.2102.11 to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line instead of the required 10 ft.; 2) Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line instead of the required 20 ft.; 3) Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front lot line - Code requires 30 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line - Code requires 20 ft.; 4) Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than the permitted 75%. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Dennis Saviano Michaele Skowron None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: David Schien 512 NaWaTa Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking: 1. Section 14.2102.11 to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. Code requires 10 feet. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line. Code requires 20 feet. ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 2 of 5 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front lot line - Code requires 30 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line - Code requires 20 ft.; 4. Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than 75% as allowed by Code. A ti haat Cary Chickerneo, 350 West Kensington Roo Attorney for the petitioner, indicated t he would be presenting the case for his client but would like to swear -in all witnesses beforehand. Chairman Basnik proceeded to swear -in Warren Kostak, 55 East Euclid Avenue, Architect and Ray Naegele, 2016 East Euclid, the petitioner. Mr. Chickerneo proceeded to explain the proposal. He stated that the petitioner is proposing to construct 4,895 sq. ft. retail store and parking to be used for a video store. He indicated that this is a challenging site to develop because of its small size and long, narrow shape. The proposal is attempting to create an economically viable development and be sensitive to the surroundings. The petitioner believes that a single use will be more sensitive to the surrounding residents. However, to make a video store economically viable to attract a major franchise, a minimum store size of around 5,000 sq. ft. is necessary. He indicated that the typical video store is between 6,000-6,500 square feet. Mr. Chickerneo continued to explain the specific variations requested. With regard to the zero foot building setback from the east property line, he stated that they believed that this was the best side to maximize encroachment as it abuts commercial property. He noted that footings could be constructed that wouldn't extend beyond the lot line. He also noted that there are utility and drainage easements on three of the four sides of this lot which could be considered a hardship. He stated that the proposed 10 ft. rear setback is the same as the adjacent gas station. He noted that the building will only be 14 ft. tall and will be brick on all facades. He stated that the petitioner is willing to increase landscaping along the rear if necessary. Regarding the parking lot setback variations, he stated that the zero foot along the east is somethings suggested to encourage flow-through traffic to the gas station site. The 10 fL setback proposed on the west side would be screened with landscaping and a 6 ft. solid wood fence. In addition, he presented a petition signed by the adjacent property owner and two other neighbors stating that they did not object to the proposal He further stated that the lot coverage variation was relatively minor considering the site constraints. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, thanked Mr. Chickerneo for the thorough presentation. She stated that this is one of the best proposals staff has seen for this site, noting that it is very similar to a proposal presented earlier this year. She then presented staffs concerns with the proposed variations. ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 3 of 5 With regard to the zero foot building setback from the east property line, staffs primary concerns are the impact on future redevelopment of the neighboring gas station site and constructing a permanent structure on top of an easement. Allowing a zero foot building setback could impose a hardship on the redevelopment of the adjacent site due to building separation requirements. The easement would have to be vacated to allow construction of a permanent structure. Staff would recommend maintaining the 5 ft. setback instead. Ms. Farnham suggested making the building longer by expanding to the west, eliminating four proposed parking spaces. She noted that there would still be 20 parking spaces which meets Code. She stated that staff cannot support such a drastic reduction of the rear yard adjacent to residential property. She also suggested additional landscaping along the rear property line to ensure continuous screening. With regard to the parking lot setbacks, Ms. Farnham stated that staff believes allowing flow-through driveway access to the gas station site makes sense as both are very small lots, and could share access off Euclid. She suggested that the property owners may want to set up a cross access agreement. She noted that the front setback tapers from 14 ft. to zero ft. at the driveway opening. Staff believes there is adequate space for landscape screening. She stated that the 10 ft. setback on the west will be amply landscaped and a fence will eliminate headlights shining into the adjacent residential property. She noted that the adjacent house is about 40 ft. away from the parking lot. She stated that the 784 lot coverage requested is a relatively minor variation from the 75% allowed given the constraints of this small lot. She noted that on-site detention will be required. Mr. Basnik questioned why staff was concerned about the 10 ft. setback to the rear but not to the west side. Julie Farnham stated that the rear yard abuts 3-4 residents whereas the west only abuts one and it is a sideyard with a garage in between the house and parking lot. Mrs. Skowron asked if the 10 ft. rear yard would be green space or if any would be used for parking. Is staffs concern primarily because 10 ft. is less than ideal? Julie Farnham stated that staff prefers to minimize the impact on residential property whenever possible. She noted that while a video store is not a very intense use, the use could change in the future. Mr. Saviano thanked Mr. Kostak for the site plan which clearly indicates the variations requested. He asked how staff felt about a 15 ft. rear yard and how far away the homes are on the north. ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 4 of 5 Julie Farnham stated "that they are at least 25 ft.; some may be 35-40 ft away. She also stated that staff realizes this is a difficult site to develop and that there Haight be ,justification for compromise, but would be looking for additional screening for compensation.. Mr. Cassidy acknowledged that while 5,000 sq. ft. may be the ideal store size, this site can't accommodate the ideal. Mr. Chickerneo stated that 5,000 sq. ft. is not ideal but workable. It is the minimum size to make development economically feasible. He noted that to ensure business success, size is critical. He further noted that the property will be owner -operated and not leased. Mr. Lannon expressed concerns about a future change of use noting that B-4 zoning permits much more intensive uses. Mr. Chickerneo stated that he didn't foresee a quick change of ownership but agreed there are no guarantees. Mr. Cassidy also expressed concern about the future development along Euclid Avenue. Mrs. Skowron stated that it is not the Board's purpose to redesign the plan and suggested that a new plan which takes into consideration the concerns expressed, be brought back for review at the next meeting. She also stated concerns about the lack of buffering between the parking lot and the gas station site and potential traffic problems resulting from through - access between lots. She also stated that she is not overly concerned about reducing the rear setback if it will be green space, but would like to get closer to the ideal. Mr. Chickerneo stated that the proposed plan is flexible and that his client was open to suggestions. However, the site has many constraints, including easements on three sides, whereas the adjacent property only has easements on two sides. Mr. Lannon stated that the properties were owned by the same person who was involved with the subdivision and creation of the easements. This property was purchased with the existing easements in place. Some discussion ensued on how to modify the plan to increase the setbacks without significantly reducing the building size. David Schien, 512 NaWaTa expressed concerns about lot coverage variations in general, in light of the Village's flooding problems. Mr. Brettrager noted that the plan modifications suggested would reduce the lot coverage from the 78% requested -possibly to below the 75% maximum allowed. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to approve the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking at 2016 East Euclid Avenue: ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 5 of 5 1. Section 14.2102.B to allow a 5 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 15 ft. building setback from the rear property line. 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front (south) and side (east) lot lines, and 10 ft. from the side (west) lot. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow a maximum of 78% lot coverage. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property line as shown on the submitted site plan. 2. Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings. 3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground. 4. Any security lighting which faces residential property consist of cut-off fixtures (down -lighting). 5. No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building. 6. Continuous hedge to be planted along the north property line to provide solid screening adjacent to residential property. Mr. Cassidy moved; seconded by Mr. Saviano. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 7-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Jude F am, Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MCUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: JULIE FARNHAM, PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 25, J."I CASE NO.: ZBAr79-V.91 APPLICANT: RAY NAEGELE ADDRESS: 2016 EAST EUCLID LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. ZONING: B4 LOT SIZE: 18,165 sq.ft. % COVERAGE: 78% proposed F -A -R.: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 tt The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking: 1. Section 14.2102.13 to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. Code requires 10 ft. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line. Code requires 20 ft. 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front lot line - Code requires 30 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line -Code requires 20 ft. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than 75% as allowed by Code. PLANNING Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 4,895 sq. ft. retail store and required parking on this lot. As proposed, 24 parking spaces will be provided including two handicapped stalls. Code only requires 20 spaces and one handicapped stall. The building will be 14 ft. tall and have face brick on all sides. Because of the small size of the lot, several setback variations are requested for the building and parking lot. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The proposal is similar to one presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals earlier this year. One of the primary differences is that only one retail store will be created. The previous proposal included" four stores (2 retail; 2 restaurants) within a similar -sized building. The primary concern with the previous proposal was granting a substantial parking variation without knowing specific tenant needs. The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the proposal with some modifications to create more parking. However, the Village Board ultimately denied the request, primarily due to uncertainty about parking demand for restaurant uses and concern about overbuilding this lot. Staff generally supported the previous request but had concerns about severely reducing the perimeter yards, particularly adjacent to residential property. Staff has the same concerns with this request. Following is a discussion of the individual variations requested: The applicant is requesting a 0'-0" building setback adjacent to the service station. A 10 foot sideyard is required by Code. Staff has several concerns with such a drastic variation. First, building footings typically span at least 18" at their base. No part of a footing can be located off-site. To accommodate the footings, staff suggests providing a minimum setback of 2 feet. Second, staff notes that while the existing gas station building is 20'-0" from the proposed new lot line, it is likely that future Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 redevelopment of the gas station site would involve construction of a new building potentially with a shallower setback. The adjoining gas station site is a rather small corner lot, and any new construction would undoubtedly require variations. Allowing the proposed retail store to be built 0'40" or 2'-0" from the lot line, could limit the feasibility of granting reasonable variations for redevelopment of the Mobil site, due to separation requirements between buildings. Staff believes a minimum of a 5 ft. setback should be maintained, so the proposed use will not have any adverse impact on redevelopment potential of the Mobil site. In addition, a 5 ft. utility easement was created along the east property line when this lot was resubdivided earlier this year. The Development Code prohibits placing permanent structures over an easement. A portion of the easement would have to be vacated to construct the building over it. To increase the setback, staff suggests shifting the building to the east. This would require elimination of parking spaces #9-12, however, 20 spaces would still remain which meets Code requirements. ». » » A 10 ft. rear setback is requested from the north property line for the 97.9 ft. length of the building. Code requires 20 feet. Staff cannot support such a significant (50%) reduction of the rear yard in this location. This property abuts 3 or 4 residential lots and a 10 ft. rear yard would not provide an adequate buffer between a commercial building and residential property. Staff notes that the building will only be 14 ft. tall and will have face brick on all sides. This will give the building a more residential scale and reduce the visual impact on the neighbors. The building will have to be reduced in size to provide a larger rear yard. It might be possible to make the building longer to minimize the amount of square footage lost. The applicant should address the feasibility of a smaller and/or reconfigured building. The residents abutting this lot all have solid wood fences along their rear property lines which will provide some screening. In addition, the applicant is proposing to plant some trees in the rear yard. Staff notes that this meets the requirements of the landscape ordinance for perimeter yard screening. However, the fences are on the neighbor's property and may not always provide a continuous screen. Therefore, staff suggests that a hedge be planted along the fence to ensure continuous screening in the future. A 0'-0" setback is requested along the proposed east property line. This would allow a direct connection between the proposed parking lot and the existing Mobil site. Staff encourages the coordinated development of these lots, since they are both relatively small. Staff also believes flow-thru circulation makes sense. The front setback along Euclid Avenue tapers from 14 ft. to zero ft. at the narrowest point. This results from the angled front lot line along Euclid Avenue. The zero ft. setback is adjacent to the driveway opening onto Euclid Avenue. The area immediately adjacent to the driveway must be free of any significant. landscaping in Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4 order to maintain unobstructed site lines. Staff feels adequate parking lot screening can be achieved along the frontage, but parking spruce #8 should be eliminated to provide additional landscape area between the sidewalk and the parking lot. The dumpster area could be converted to a parking space and the dumpster relocated near the building. A 10 ft. setback is requested adjacent to residential property to the west. A 20 foot setback is required by Code. The adjacent residential lot is oriented lengthwise along Euclid Avenue. As such, ample sideyard setbacks exist. The garage is 16' from the lot line. A shed exists between the garage and the lot line, providing some additional separation between the parking lot and the neighboring home. The home is approximately 40 ft. feet from the parking lot. While this is a significant variation, 10 ft. provides adequate space for landscape screening. Staff recognizes that this is a difficult site to develop. Providing conforming setback would require significantly reducing the size of the building. This could effect the development economics substantially, however, again the petitioner should fully explain the absolute hardship in this instance. Where parking lots abut residential property, landscape screening must be provided which is at least 6 feet in height. The site plan shows that a six foot solid wood fence will be installed along the west edge of the property. This will eliminate headlights shining into the adjacent residential property. Natural landscape materials proposed should also help improve the appearance. 4. Lot Covera¢e. As proposed, the lot coverage is 77.7%, slightly over the maximum 75% allowed by Code. Given the constraints of this small lot, staff does not believe this is a significant variation and has no major objections to this request. However, sufficient on-site detention will be required. OTHER VILLAGE STAFF CO Some concerns were expressed regarding the variations including: a. Detention must be provided on-site. Engineering notes that some water may be stored on the parking lot surface. A grading/site engineering plan is required. b. An access permit to Euclid Ave. must be obtained from the Cook County Hwy. Dept. C. Utilities are available, however, permits must be obtained from Citizens Utility Company and Cook County. d. Public improvements on Euclid Avenue Right -Of -Way, including a sidewalk street lights, and parkway trees are required. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 5 SUMMAKUREMMMENDAmNi Despite some significant variations, this is one of the best proposals the planning staff has seen for this difficult site. A single retail tenant may be the most appropriate scale of development for this small commercial property. As proposed, the required amount of on- site parking can be provided. In addition, a small retial use will have less impact on adjacent residences than other uses permitted in the. B4 District. Staff generally supports the proposal with the following exceptions: 1. A minimum Y building setback should be provided from the proposed east property line. This will increase the distance between existing and potential future buildings, and will keep the drainage easement unobstructed as required by the Development Code. The applicant should justify the need for the variance, including the feasibility of reducing the size of the building or shifting it to the west to further increase the building side setback. 2. A conforming 20 ft. building setback should be provided from the north property line. This will buffer the encroachment of the 98 ft. long building from adjacent residents. While the proposed video store may not have a significant impact on the adjacent residents, the use could change in the future. 3. Eliminating parking space #8 to provide green area between the sidewalk and parking lot. This parking space could be replaced by converting the dumpster area to a parking stall and relocating the dumpster next to the building. In addition; staff suggests approval of the request should be conditioned on: - Providing a 5 ft. building setback from the east property line or vacating the portion of the easement occupied by the proposed building. - Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property line as shown on the submitted site plan. - Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings. - All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground. - Any security lighting which faces residential property consist of cut-off fixtures (down - lighting). - No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building. • Continuous hedge to be planted along the north property line to provide solid screening adjacent to residential property. Approved: David M. Clements, Director CAF 1/14/92 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED A EU_V'ENUE T 2016 EAST CLID A WHEREAS, Ray Naegele (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 2015 East Euclid Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 2 in River -Euclid Resubdivision, being a Resubdivision of Lot I in Mobil oil Corp. Subdivision of parts of the northeast quarter and the southeast quarter of Section 25, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to plat thereof registered on September 13, 1985 with the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, per Document No. LR 43 62091 in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks the following: 1. A variation from Section 14.2102.B to allow a 0 foot building setback from the interior side lot line, instead of the required 10 feet. 2. A variation from Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 foot building setback from the rear property line, instead of the required 20 feet. 3. A variation from Section 14.2102.E to allow a parking lot to come as close as zero feet to the front lot line, instead of the required 30 feet; and 10 feet from the side lot line, instead of the required 20 feet. 4. A variation from Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage, instead of the permitted 75%. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 79-V-91 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 12th day of December, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 26th day of November, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 79-V-91 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting variations, as modified from the original request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village EvIrdim IWO N ZBA 79-V-91 Page 2 of of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the following: 1. A variation from Section 14.2102.B to allow a five foot (51) building setback from the interior side lot line, instead of the required 10 feet. 2. A variation from Section 14.2102.0 to allow a fifteen foot (151) building setback from the rear property line, instead of the required 20 feet. 3. A variation from Section 14.2102.E to allow a parking lot to come as close as zero foot (01) to the front lot line, instead of the required 30 feet; and ten feet (101) from the side lot line, instead of the required 20 feet. 4. A variation from Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage, instead of the permitted 75%. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION SIX: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ,1992. VILIAGE OF MOUNT RO EC."PL/ PIANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W-1 FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: JANUARY 15,1992 SUBJECT: HISTORICAL SOCIETY - ORDINANCE #4274 On February 20, 1991, the Village Board approved Ordinance #4274, authorizing certain variations for the Mount Prospect Historical Society at 101 South Maple Street. As with all variations, a one year time limit is included in the ordinance, to help assure the timely completion of approved projects. With the attached letter, the Historical Society asks that the Village Board extend Ordinance #4274, to allow more time for funding of the proposed educational center. Staff recommends approval of the extension. DMC:hg Attachment MOUNT PF,05PECT J41ST ORIC)kL !))OCIETY P.O. Box 81 - 1100 Linneman Road - Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Telephone: (708) 956-6777 December 27, 1991 Mr. David M. Clements Director of Planning and Zoning Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Dave: Per our recent conversation, the Mount Prospect Historical Society hereby requests extention on the variations covered under Ordinance No. )127� passed February 20, 1Q91. Inasmuch as the funding Is rot available to begIn the erlucational center with handicaoner' access these vari- atiors will be avolicable at a later date. Sircerely, A Dolores Haugh President cc Yavor G. Farley V411age Yanwzpr J. rixon Walter R!ltkowsl,,,i Dedicated to the discovery, preservation and dissemination of knowledge about the history of Mount Prospect, Illinois. Winner of 1989 Governor's Hometown Award and Certificate of Excellence Congress of Illinois Historical Societies & Muscums CAF/ 1/15/92 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4274 BY EXTENDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR VARIATIONS GRANTED TO THE MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL MUSEUM191 , SOUTH MA ..--PLE STREF WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did adopted ordinance No., 4274 entitled "An Ordinance Granting Variations for Property Commonly Known as 101 South Maple Street" at their regular meeting held February 19, 1991; and WHEREAS, the variations granted through the passage of ordinance No. 4274 contained the provision that building permits must be secured within one year from the date of passage; and WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested that the one year effective date contained in Ordinance No. 4274 be extended for one additional year. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That SECTION FOUR of Ordinance No. 4274 is hereby amended by extending the effective date for the variations being the subject of Ordinance No. 4274 for one additional year. SECTION THREE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after is passage and approval in the manner provided by law. F., VA *5 NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President &VI 1992. Illinois Department -Resolution for Improvement by Municipality Construction of Transportation Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES of the C—il or Pridoot -d B -rd of Truax. VILLAGE of MOUNT PROSPECT Illinois City. To—t or Village that the following descrived street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Code: Name of Thoroughfare Route From To MAYA LANE 150 FT W. OF LARCH LN BURNING BUSH LANE WHITEGATE AVENUE CATHY LANE CUL-DE-SAC JODY COURT MEIER ROAD CUL-DE-SAC �LOIS COURT LAWERENCE LANE CUL-DE-SAC BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, 1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of REMOVAL OF EXISTING PAM BASE AND DETERIORATED SURFACE, WITH INSTALLATION OF NEW CURB & GUTTER AND FLEXIBLE BASE. and be designated as Section and shall be constructed 92 -00112 -00 -FP feet wide 2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional) sum of FOUR HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS Dollars ($ 400,000.00 for the improvement of said section from the municipality's allotment of Motor Fuel Tax funds. 3. That work shall be done by CONTRACT ; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation. APPROVED ,19 N4.rixocat of Trartp..U— Ddrt,ict F,ginoor Mr. I, Miss CAROL A. FIELDS VILLAGE Clerk Mrs. (City, To- or Mflgo) in and for th VILLAGE of MOUNT PROSPECT County of COOK hereby certify the foregoing to be true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES (Council or P-idrot and Board of Troaeoa) JANUARY 21 19 92 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this day of , A.D. 19 (SEAL) J6 VILLAGE Clerk. (City, To— or Wkg.) Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager FROM: Fred Tennyson, Project Engineer DATE: January 3, 1992 SUBJECT: Village Street Reconstructions Attached is a Resolution for Improvement by Municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code (BLR 4103) for $400,000.00 for the Village Street Reconstructions Project. The project includes the improvements of: 1.) Maya Lane - Larch Drive to Burning Bush Lane 2.) Whitegate Ave. - Cathy Lane to Cul de Sac 3.) Jody Court - Meier Road to Cul de Sac 4.) Lois Court - Lawrence Lane to Cul de Sac The resolution is required by the Illinois Department of Transportation before motor fuel tax funds can be used for this project. I recommend that this resolution be adopted at the Village Board Meeting on January 21, 1992. This project will be funded with monies from the 1991-1992 Budget, Account Numbers 22-071-04-8510 and 01-071-04-8501, Page 126. Fred Tennyson, P.E. I concur with the above recommendation. -q41r--4 �--- -KF J-( ulbecker, P.E. gmffieq��i x 2foordinator I concur with the above recommendation. Chuck Bencic, P.E. Director of Inspection Services FT/m Attachments ^- — UIllinois Department of Transportation Division ofHighways/District 11 201 West Center Court/Scxuumbu,g.Uxmoio/6V19o-1og6 LOCAL ROADS AND STREET COMPLETED AUDITS January IO, 1992 Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street Ht. Prospect, Illinois 60056 Dear Ns. Fields: Enclosed is a copy of a Audit covering the year 1990. This report should be presented to your local governing body at its first regular meeting after receipt of this letter, and then filed as a permanent record in your office. Very truly yours, James C. Slifer, P.E. District Engineer r - Local Roads And Streets FN/RR/rk JAN 14 19K mt. mt. Prospect Agency Village Clerk Audit Year F—x]Motor Fuel Tax 1990 r-1 Township Bridge Audit Number 47 [7 Special Assessment r-1 G. O. Bond Issue Date May 2, 1991 0 MFT Fund Bond Issue UMindis Department of Transportation 1, Bureau of Local Roads and Streets BLR 9009 (Rev. 4/90) t of Transportation City Village County Auditors' Certificate Audit Report Number We hereby certify that we have audited the books and records in so far as they pertain to the receipt and disbursement of ,a._ 6-- funds of the for the period beginning 19 IV— and ending . 19 4— and that the entries for receipts*ln th se books and records are true and correct and are In agreement with the records maintained by Ilia Department of Transportation and that entries for disbursements are supported by cancelled warrants or checks wish exceptions noted In the audit findings. We further certify that we have verified entries in the claim registers with the original claims and cancelled warrants, that we have examined and checked the records of the Clerk _ - Treasurer, tinge call fiet-Od 'he foree 11616-4 104 ilia-MAii"a" and noted in the audit findings. and have found them to be In accordance therewith with exceptions REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY Auditor Date I 19 • --Da__ ist�,�-CaRoads and Shouts Euulnear M 11 1401 Ulnv 2-841 Illinois Department of'Transp tion City Village Mt. Prospect County Auditor's Comments Audit Report No. 47 Audit Period January 1, 1990 Thru December 31, 1990 Purpose of Audit To determine the status of the Mt. Pro:Pect Motor Fuel Tax Fund as of Dec 31, 1990 Other Receipts in the amount of $101,326.57 represents the following: Interest on invested funds. $ 43,825.21 Reimbursement from State of Ill. applied to (89-00000-00 tai) 28,119.88 Reimbursement from other sources applied or indicated 29,381.48 $]01,326.57 Final papers are on file and agree for section 83-00080-00 BR. Final papers are on file, although no expenditures were made nor authorizations made for sections 85-00091-00 WR and 86-00093-00 PW The 1987 and 1988 Maintenance Statements are on file and agree as adjusted. A selective sampling was made of claims to this fund. Signed �S �� Illinois Department of Transportation Fund Balance and Bank Reconciliation City Audit Report No, 47�, Village Mt. Prospect County 90 Audit Period Jan. 1, 19— Dec. 31, 90 19 Date _ 19 Fund Balance Unobilgated j Obligated Total Outstanding Warrants Balance Previous Audit 256,965 54 Allottments & Certifications 1,072,932 86 1,072,932 86 Total MFT Funds 1,329,898 40 1, 456, 872 48 Approved Authorizations (1,190, 671 71) 0 7,501 36 Other Receipts 3, 825 21 101, 326 57 139,221 69 F1,418,972 36 Total 1,558,199 05 1,176 302 96 Disbursements 1,176, 302 96 Surplus 110,707 15 1 (110o707 15 249,933184 131,962 25 Unexpended Balance 96 09 Bank Reconciliation Balance In Fund per Bank Certification Dec. 31, 19 go 5,464 62 Deduct Outstanding Warrants Add Outstanding Investments 376,431 47 Add Deposits in Transit Net Balance in Account Dec. 31, 19 90 381, 896 9 Bt R 9003 (2-90) Certified Correct t`" � u ern Haan Aueilor 6. UIllinois Department of Transportation CITY VILLAGE Cp(INTy . Mt. Prospect Audit Period Jan. 1, 19 90 -Dec. 31, 1990 Investment Schedule Motor Fuel Tax Funds Audit Report No. 47 Dale of Date of Purchare Maturity Redemption Purthax Cost Value at Maturityempt or Redemption Interval Outstanding; Earned Dsc. 31 Type .of Investment t3JS 12-31-89 496 ,944,79 7 43,676.97 376,431.47 IPTIP 1,357,000.00 429.13 Cb1=kJW A01 -t- (103.49) Service Charge 165.00 8,/99 122 1 733 431.47 1,357,000.00 43,825.21 376,431.47 REMARKS: ,ti a UnoS ()-qtt) State of Illinois SUMMARY OF MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND TRANSACTIONS T'Y BY SECTIONS and CATAQORIES LLAGE )LINTY I Prospect Audit Period lan.1,19 90 • Dec. 31.1940 Audit Report No. 47 EMARKS: • mom I memo ��ii������ 87-00037-01 BR 80-00068-00 11L 83-00076-00 83-00077-00 TL 83-00078-00 WR P` . . #1■MIM- +'I�l�Lr!}:■IMMMI ' ' 1' I '�iS� 83-00081-00 83-00082-00 TT. 83-00083-00 TL 84-00084-00 84-00086-# ��®ice■ �=N Iii # m wo hmmm 0 1 M I E I W W���, EMARKS: State of Illinois SUMMARY OF MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND TRANSACTIONS ,,ITN. BY SECTIONS and CATAOORIES Audit Report No. 47 VILLAGE U Mt. Prospect. Audit T len. 1.19 90 • Dee. 31, t4 90 REMARKS: Total Amount Adjustment Ods Told Total Db- srlpAp to Uwo ed Told Me mo - Umspena� YbA Dir RECTION =�. Amt Authorize tteoetpb vabbFunds A�e9ebM busameots tletaaoe lent sada bunementu Construction 84-00087-00 TI, 11,112 t,- 85-00088-00 FP 2,397 70 2,397 70. E827 7 49,244 27 5- 82_ FP 8,927 72 8,927 72 7 45,027 5 85-00020-00 tR 23,323 5z 85-00092-00 RS 17,954 301 17,,q5A 17,954 80 32 045 20 87-00094-00 PV 2 102 - - 1 21 87-00095-00 CG 87-00096-00 TL 82-00098-00 ER (93,321 1 (93,321 41 93 321 88-00099-00 RS 32 4 4 32,644 54 32,644 541320,907 56 (983 25 (983 25 983 25 88-00100-00 TL (3,594 58 3,594 58 88-00101-00 SS (3,594 8 11,530 66 11 530 66 26 469 3 88-00101-01 SS 11,530, 6 88-0 102-0 54 54 499 15 (54,499 54.499115 89-001 4- 65 REMARKS: ♦ County Road Dist. Municipalitytib- Prosect Summary of Motor Fuel Tax Fund Transactions By Sections and Categories Audit Period Jan 1, 19-90 -Dec. 31,19-90 Audit Report No. Balance Total Amount SECTION Prev. Audit Authorized Other Adjustment,, Receipts Total Funds Available Total Dis- bursements Surplus to Unobligated Balance Unexpended Balance Total Accumu- lated Dis- bursements Construction 89-00105-00 TL 14,963 4 89-00106-00 TL (3,07040) —.—� 270,28 0 14700 0 3.07 40 070 43,070 90-00108-00 PV 284 989 00 271 252 33 13,736 6 (14,700 271,252 00, 33 —Enginrin 84-00063-02 ES 62,800 0 62,800 00 62,800 0 64.60019q 84-00064-02 ES (64,600 0 {64 600 00 {4�0� �� {3,530 32,659 81; 52 83-00077-00 CH 6,088 1 3 495 60 83-00080-00 EIR 6,088 18 6,088 18 476 7 84-00084-00 WR 1,197 50 84-0085-00 FP 500 0 912 25 85-00088-00 FP 500 00 500 00 1,791 50 97-60094-00 FP 87-00095-00 CG (169 00 (169 00 (16 0() 169 00 REMARKS County Road Dist. Municipality Mt Prospect Summary of Motor Fuel Tax Fund Transactions By Sections and Categories Audit Period Jan. 1, 19-0 -Dec. 31, 19-90 Audit Report No. 47 REMARKS Surplus to Total Accumu- Balance Total Amount Other Total Funds Total Dis- Unobligated Unexpended lated Dis- SECTION Prev. Audit Authorized Adjustment, Receipts Available bursements Balance Balance bursements 87-00098-00 FP (3.71 0 (3,715 01L (3 715 01 3,71 88-00101-00 FP (1,500 0 (1,500 00 (1,500 00 1,500 00 89-00103-00 ES (1,123 0 (1,123 00 (1,123 00 1 123 00 89-00104-00 BR {13;017 7 (13,017 72 14 553 08 (27,570 801 27,570 80 90-00107-00ES 7.724 50 (7,724 50 7,724 50 Maim (64,491 58 86-00000-00 GM 18,760 1 18,760 19 18,760 19 983,830 08 (32,151 63 87-00000-00 GM 74,033 7 74,033 70 245 0 73,788 70 697,617 93 (5S_,n_3 76 88-00000-00 GM 115,637 23 115,637 23 115,637 23 413,480 5 89-00000-00 GM TR_, 977,892 54 90-00000-00 GM 752,658 25 28,119 8 780,778 13 797,304 1(_ (16,525971797,304 (28,119 99 10 Maint. Eng. t 86-00000-00 GM (339 0 (339 0 (339 0) 399 00 87-00000-00 GM {'245 00 {245 00 {245 (84 0 00 88-00000-00 GM84 00 84 00 WE 01V REMARKS County Road Dist, Municipality Mt. Prospect Summary of Motor Fuel Tax Fund Transactions By Sections and Categories Audit Period Jan. 1, 1 919a -Dec. 31, 19_90 Audit Report No. 47 SECTION Balance Prev. Audit Total Amount Authorized Adjustment., Other Receipts Total Funds Available Total Dis- bursements Surplus to Unobligated Balance Unexpended Balance Total Accumu- lated Dis- bursements Maint. 89-00000-00 GM 2,184 25 (2,184 25 Earn. Int. 88-00000-00 Ac 471504 89 47,504 89 47,604 89-00000-00 AC 62,957 26 62,957 26 90-00000-00 AC 43,825 21 43,825 21 43,82521 Other Category 90-00000-00 AA 13,298 4 13,298 40 13,29E40 i l - �Wlmi' 126,974 08 1',190,6711711 101326 5 1,418,972 36 1,17630 X96 110,70 15 131 962 2 REMARKS Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W MY LM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: January 2, 1992 SUBJ: Water System Control Panel Upgrade In December of 1985 Lake Michigan water began flowing through the Village's water distribution system. Prior to that historic time and in preparation for, major improvements were needed on our water distribution system. in excess of $500,000 was expend- ed making the physical connections to the JAWA delivery struc- tures; repiping of our water reservoirs to fill from the distri- bution system; all new telemetry controls at all pumping sta- tions; and installation of a new centralized supervisory comput- er system to control all the new telemetry. The Village's water distribution system comprises five standby deep wells, three JAWA delivery structures, six ground storage reservoirs and one elevated tank having a total storage capacity of 8.8 million gallons, five pumping(booster) stations and a water distribution system pipe network. The elevated tank water level serves as the control variable for starting and stopping all the booster pumps. A centralized supervisory computer system is responsible for the complete control and monitoring of the entire water distribution system and is located at the Public Works Facility. In addi- tion, this system also monitors two sewage lift stations, six sewer relief stations and currently one of our public buildings (the Village Hall). The core of the centralized computer system is specialized super- visory software that was developed by Aquatrol Corporation of Minneapolis, MN. They were also the company that supplied all of the new telemetry equipment. The current system, as original- ly designed and supplied, has served our system well over the past six years. The system now, however, has reached its capaci- ty and some of the associated hardware is no longer serviceable or available. We have lost all maintenance tracking capabilities of all pump- ing equipment; we have no capacity for adding additional public building monitoring alarms; and every time we want to add any new alarm monitors we are faced with deciding what to eliminate to make room for the new, i.e. we recently installed new chlo- rine monitors at the three delivery structures. Another major concern is our alarm system control terminals. The current "Visual" model is no longer manufactured and because of its unique configuration and the existing software limita- tions, we have been unable to find a replacement. This terminal has frequently been down and our only means of repairing it was to purchase two used units to be used for parts. Aquatrol Corporation has recently upgraded their supervisory software. This new system addresses all of our current system's shortfalls and is expandable for our future needs. The new system will also interface with. all our existing telemetry, is user configurable and IBM compatible, which eliminates our prob- lem with the alarm/system control terminals. J.M. Process Systems, Inc. is the local Aquatrol- distributor and they have submitted a proposal to, upgrade our centralized super- visory control system for $35,064.00. This includes all soft- ware, hardware replacement, installation and traini-ng. Because we are not replacing our entire system it is necessary to stay with the same manufacturer. Therefore, I request a waiver of the bidding requirement and approval to award a contract to J.M. Process System for $35,064.00. On Page 147, Account Number 41-072-08-8038 there is $40,000 allocated for this proposed. expenditure. J.M. Process, system was the firm that supplied and installed the original system. Z) ., btatuxt 4_e4i�.� Herbert L. Weeks HLW/eh CONTPANL.UPG/FILES/WATER J4, PROCESS SYSTEMS, INC.." • Water& Wastewater Instnimentation 0 December 3, 1991 Village of Mt. Prospect Public Works 1700 West Central Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Mr. G. Andler Subject: Upgrade of Your Aquatrol Computer System Dear Glen: In response to our recent conversation I would like to propose for your consideration the following: 1 - Aquatrol Computer Upgrade to include an Intel 302-20 386 computer, a Quatech PXB-721 computer board, a 2011 VGA color monitor, and Prosoft 2000 software package (configuration not included). -Includes 2 days of training and 3 days of start-up services. G -Term software is included for your laptop computer (provided by village). Total Net Price $ 35,064.00 Should you have any questions on any of the above, feel free to contact the undersigned. /I mm 5100 West 127th Street Alsip, Illinois 60659 (708) 597.9717 FAX (708) 597-5147 Mount Prospect Public Works DepiAment -• •-• TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: January 14, 1992 SUBJ: Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Insituform In the current budget, there are funds allocated for sanitary sewer repairs. Based on our schedule of proposed sanitary sewer system improvements, and as presented during the budget hear- ings, the following sewers have extensive pipe failures and need repair. 1. Yates Lane (between Thayer and Mitchell) Manhole #37 to #35 811 diameter, 284 lineal feet with 6 laterals Lump Sum Cost $22,170 2. Emmerson Lane (between Yates and Wolf) Manhole #32 to #31 8" diameter, 315 lineal feet with 4 laterals Lump Sum Cost $20,460 3. Owen St. - east rear yard (between Lonnquist and Sunset) Manholes #5 to #15 to #3 811 diameter, 600 lineal feet with 17 laterals and two protruding tap -cuts Lump Sum Cost $39,690 Combined Total $82,320 All three of these segments of sanitary sewer have been loca- tions of reoccurring sewer blocks, partially collapsed pipes, and continual maintenance due to root growth at the joints. The lines on Yates and Emerson are located in the parkway under large healthy trees and the line on Owen is located in a rear yard easement. As in the past, I am proposing to repair these sewers using the insituform process of relining the existing sewer pipe without the need to excavate. This is our only choice when it comes to repairing the rear yard sewer where we have no access. It also saves our parkway trees on the other two locations. The cost to reline these sewers as estimated above is $82,320 including lining, lateral reinstatement, cleaning, and removal of protruding taps. Insituform has also quoted a unit cost of $340.00 for any additional lateral reinstatements, and $500.00 each for cutting off any additional protruding taps. Due to a protruding tap on the rear yard sewer on Owen, there is about 100 feet of sewer we have not televised. After Insituform re- moves the protruding tap they may find additional laterals or protruding taps. The Insituform process of sewer lining is an insertion method where the liner is cured in place. The Village currently has over 20,000 feet installed with the first lines being installed back in 1982-83. Insituform Midwest is the only contractor li- censed and qualified to do this type of work in this area. I therefore request the Village Board waive the bidding process and award a contract to Insituform Midwest, Inc. for a not to exceed amount of $86,500. This amount is more than the cost outlined above and is being requested to cover any additional laterals or protruding taps we may find. Funding for this pro- posed contract can be found on Page 152 Account No. 41-072-11-8001 (sewer repairs) of the 1991/92 budget where there is $90,000 allocated. qlx� Herbert L. Weeks HLW/eh CC: Deputy Director of Public Works Water/Sewer Superintendent SANSEWIN.SIT/FILES/SEWERS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ILLINOIS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM January 15, 1992 To: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager From: Edward M. Cavello, Fire Chief V Subject: Walls and ceiling at Station #12, Golf & Busse The bar joist ceiling at this fire station is painted a light color, which was last repainted in the early 70's. The accumulation of dirt and diesel fumes has made this ceiling very unsightly. the walls have not been repainted for 4 or 5 years, while awaiting the painting of the ceiling. Last November we solicited prices from painting contractors to paint the ceiling black, and walls a light color. J. Bernard Mullen was the only legitimate company that responded. I would like to request a waiver of the bid process and award the contract to J. Bernard Mullen for $8390. The funds are available in this years budget. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS,,VILLAGE CLERK RE: VOTING REQUIREMENTS DATE: JANUARY 17, 1992 During the brief discussion during a Committee of the Whole meeting, the question was asked as to the history of some voting requirements, i.e. "present and voting" versus "then holding office". I looked up the Zoning Board of Appeals files from 1986, as well as the minutes of the Village Board meetings, and made copies of that information for you, all of which is attached. I hope this information will be helpful to you when the subject is brought up at a future Committee of the� Whole meeting. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk /caf Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: T2KRA0CE L. 8URG8ADD, VILLAGE M&0&G88 FROM, SICP830 M. P&8K, DlK8CI0R OF PLANNING AND %0N[0C SUBJECT: Z8&-6-&-86, TEXT AMENDMENTS DATE: MARCH 27, 1988 This case before the Village Board covers six different text amendments that were recommended by eta[[ and approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their March l] public hearing. The text amendments deal with industrial packing requirements and the location of the parking, changes to antennas to, ensure compliance with recent FCC rulings, setbacks of detached accessory buildings on undersized properties, and revisions of the approval procedure for variations in Single Fmuily,an6 Duplex Districts. In the Industrial District, the staff is recommending adoption of the standards regarding the number of off-street parking spaces, which were put in place for the Kensington Center and which have been used in several variations. Minimum setbacks of parking and buildings are pcuposed. In particular, the exterior aide yard or rear yard should not allow parking. Board of Appeals suggested amending this to also preclude any packing in a trans itional yard. They also felt, and the staff would concur, that vehicles used in a business should not occupy required parking spaces but that additional pecking should be provided for these delivery, service, or other vehicles. Amendment Number 3 places amateur radio operator antennae as a special use rather than m permitted use to ensure compliance with recent FCC rulings on antennas. The next amendment clarifies requirements for filing any type of case before the Zoning Board of Appeals. This relates to ptuof that the individual has an interest in or owneroh[p of the property. Terrance L. Durghacd - Page Two March 27, 1886 The one proposed amendment that did not receive u unanimous, vote by the Zoning Board, was approved by a vote of 4-2. This amendment would permit detached accessory structures on lots of 50 feet or less to be within two feet of the interior property line. The Code was changed several years ago to require m 5 foot setback in order to provide for adequate fire safety and reason- able maintenance areas. Since that time, o number of variations have been requested and approved to move back to the two feet when the property is very narrow. The two objectives were based upon the fire safety issues involved. The final text amendment was the result of review and discussion by the Zoning Board and Village Board, and staff to make the Zoning Board of Appeals final in more variation cases. This stipulates their responsibilities and limits to authority. Per Board direction, it also includes a limit on the amount of variation that can octually,be requested. Finally, it provides for an appeal process should any individual object to the decision. 'SM9:hg Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM El TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: STEPHEN M. PARK, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-6-A-86, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DATE: FEBRUARY 19, 1986 This text amendment before the Zoning Board reflects seven different changes in the current standards and/or policies regarding our Ordinance. They are all used in an attempt to reduce the load of zoning cases where variations have been granted in the past and to make the procedure for zoning cases more clear and more timely. -We have addressed several issues including industrial parking requirements and where that parking can be located, radio antennas to ensure conformance with recent FCC rulings, clarifi- cation of submission requirements for site plans, surveys, and proof of ownership, setbacks of detached accessory buildings on undersized lots, and revision.of the procedures for variations in Single Family and Duplex Districts. This last amendment will make the Zoning Board of Appeals final in a number of additional cases in these districts. The applicant would therefore be processed much more quickly than the current procedure allows, but the change will also require the Zoning Board of Appeals to be more specific in their findings. SMP:HG 0 ;�lNUlB OF rUE K(g1LAR ;1LLT['�6 0 [!|E HOUNT PrOSPECT 70*lNG 80ARD OF ApPEAi5 Z8A CASE NO. 6-A-88 Hearing Date: �arc h lJ ,l986 PE[iTl0UER: Y`|lage of Mount Prospect PUBLICATION DA[E: February lO, 1086 REQUEST: Text Amendments as follows: Change the parking requirements in the I-1 District (Section 14.2205.A) and to preclude parking in portions of t�)e required side and rear yards; Change the heiuht exclusion for a.oaLe"r radio operator antennas' in the R -X, R-|, R -A, and R'2 Districts to allow such aoCuooas as a special use; Soecify "pplication mquiro.`ents for ur\ation, special use, and rezoni"g to ` enuire surveys by on Illinois Reg\s1e'od Land Surveyor and specific requirements for prubf of o:nership; Change setback requjrcments for detached IRA ME19ERS PRESENT: IBA,IMEM,SER ABSENT: OBJECTORS: Gilbert Bamik, Chairman Robert 3mttrager Lois Brothers John Gruen Marilyn O'May Len Petruce\\i Ron Cassidy None Steve Park, Director of Planning and Zoning, presented the proposed text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance.. These amendments are ' intended to clarify existing sections of Chapter 14 and to red"ce the ' load of aunioq cases, /5A 6 8 6 ' pnne 2 of / | �Iarch 13^ l92)G - . � The proposed a'-andments are as follows: ` 0NE� �`md Section 14.2205.A.1 -v�.I tm provide for revised parking calcul ations in the lndxstria `Oistrict. Delete 3ect�un l4,�205.4.l in its e*tirety and substi tute as followm� ^ ^v ` l. In the 1_1 Light Industrial District, there shall be provided - a pavaI off-street parking area sufficient in sire to provide a iii .um of one (I) pa ng space for each two hundred and pifty (250) square feet of gross floor area of the building and shall be exclusive of par -king of trucks or vehicles uperatzd by any uses on the property, except that: a.Ioe off-street parking space shall be provided by each l,5Un space Feet of gross floor area or fraction thereof used fo� warehouse purposes�nand . ' ' b. For any port ion � o=/ n building used for a lahoratory, data processing center,.ass- .bly or product repair permitted � in the J-1 District: _ l> 0.8 spaces snu]Y be provided for each person e�nployed in the primary work shift operating in such portion of the building plus 0.5 spaces for each person employed in the work shift having the next largest number of employees or alternatively 2) one space for each one thous (l,OOU) square feet of floor area or fraction thereof, xhichever shall `result m n the calculation of the larger required number of spaces . - There was discussion by the members of the Zoning Board that vehicles used in conjunction with the operation of the business should not occupy parking spaces required under the Ordinance. - , CA 8'A-36 ° 7i1e ] of :a/ch 13, 1986 Mrs. Rruthers, seconded by Mrs. 0'May, moved to approve text iieoJiaot. OqF, provided that vehicles used in conju" tion with the oyarution'of the business should not occupy parking spaces required und�,� the Ordinance. Upon rol| call: Ayes: 8rettrager, Brother, Green, O'May" Patrucel|\, ` B a s n i k Nays: None Motion carried' TWO: Xoeod the l '.Light Industrial District Section 14,2285.F of the Zuoioq D/Ji, oce to provide for revised etback of parking when located in a required side yard or rear yard, by amending as follows: ` 1. In all instances wherein industrial side yards and/or industrial rear yardsr adjacent to interior lot lines, are utilized for parking; a minimum open space of ten feet (lO') shall be required along such lot line. In no case shall parking be placed closer than thirty feet (30') to an exterior lot line. It .-.,as discussed by the members of the Board that on parking should be permitted in any transitional yard. Mr� 8rettroger, seconded by Mrs. O!May, moved to grant text amendment TWO, provided that no parking be permitted in any transitional yard. Upon roll call: Ayes: Orettrager, Brother, Green, U'May° Petruce\\i, Basnik Nays: None :otion carried. /3A 6-A .16 n«4e 4 of March l]^ 1996 THREE: . A:end the following Sections of the Zoning Ordinance,to nnsxre compliance of the Ordinance with recent Federal Comnuoicatiooa Co.xnission ruling directing all antennas be addressed similarly. Delete in its entirety, Sections 14.1004.C.1° l4^l102.C.l, and 14.I204,C.1 to eliminate amateur radio ope. ttur aoCeonas as a pernitted use. Add a new Section,14.1001.C.5, 14,1I01.C.5, 14.12.01.0.5, a^d 14.1301.C,3 to put amateur radio operator antennas as a special use, to read as fol lows : rederally licensed amateur radio operators transmitting axtaona towers with a maxiaum heig},t of sixty feet (68') and such antenna towers, including tower structures, huvioq an overall height of not more than seventy feet (7O'). Mrs, Brothers, seconded by Mrs. Q'May, moved to grant text amendment THREE as presented. ' ' Upon roll call: Ayes: Brettrager,,Brother, Green, o'May^ Petrucelli, ~ B a s n i k Nays: None , Motion carried, FOUR: Revise Sections 0.602^8.9, 14;702.0.7, and 14.802.8.3-f to provide for surveys to be prepared by a licensed surveyor and to he of ad;quate scale to read as fo|lows : A current plat of surxey of the subject property" prepared by an lllinuis 3egistored Land Surveyor, at a scale of 1" = 501, l" =.401° l" = 301" I" = 20', or other scale approved by the Zoning Administrator for larger acreage projects, which plat shall show all structures, with dimensions, on the lot, drives and parking areas, all lot dimensions, and distances of structures from lot lines. ^ . ~ /�'x 6-A-86 p«ye / of March 13, 1186 ' New Section 14.504.0,3 to read as follows: D, In all cases in the R -X, R-1, R -A, and R'2 Districts in vhich the variation will not increase the maxioxm width of driveway by more than—twenty-five percent (25%). %ew Section I4.504.1 to read as follows: 1. To hear and decide all application for variations from the location setback regulations and restrictions contained in Article IX of Chapter 21 of this Village Code for property located in the R -X, R-1, V-A" or R-2 Zoning Districts with regard to private swimming pools in all cases in which the variation will not decrease the minimum location setback requij'e':cots contained therein by more than twenty-five percent,(25%). Revise Section I4.604.A, to limit the percent of variation allowed in residential districts to read as follows: IO. to vary the location setback regulations contained in Article ` IX of Chapter 21 relating to private swinming pools provided that no such variation shall exceed twenty-five percent (25%) ^ of the requirement. ' Add a new Section to provide for an appeal procedure of any variation decision where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final. Section 14.604.D. In any case whereby a variation is granted by final action of the Zoning Board of Appeals, there shall be specific findings of fact itemized, :hich are used to substantiate the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeal* and which address each and all of the standards as set forth in this Chapter. Any individual aggrieved by a decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals whether an applicant or objector, within two -hundred ' !A -5-K'36 p''1e 8 of la/ch \], 1986 and fifty feet (250') of the subject property, may file an appeal of the decision with the Village Board. Such as ' appeal shall he filed on such forms as may be necessary with the Zoning Administrator and shall pay such fees as ,dea,ed necessary to cover all municipal expenses oo Lhe appeal. Such appeal shall he filed within fifteen (15) calendar days of the date of '|eoisiun to be contested- No decision of tne Zoning Board .f Appeals shall be effective until fifteen (15) calendar days has passed; after which permits may he issued by the village for construction. Mrs. Brothers,seconded by Mr 8rettrager, moved to grant the text a,ieodnent 8EV^ , `/ as presented. V000 roll call: Ayes: 3rettrnger, Srothers, Green, O'May, Petruce\li" 3 a s n i k Nays: None Motion carried. . These six raconmendations wil1 be forwarded to the 'Village Board for consideration at their Apri) 1st meeting. Carol A. Fields Recording Secretary MINUic5"'OF THE SPECIAL MEETING Ur IHE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 2-A-86 Hearing Date: January 9, 1986 Continued: February 13, 1986 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect PUBLICATION DATE: January 27, 1986 REQUEST: Text Amendment: Section 14.107 to 'grandfather' lots less than the required width for. existing lots. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy ZBA MEMBER ABSENT: John Green Marilyn O'May Len Petrucelli OBJECTORS/INTERESTED None PARTIES: Steve Park, Director of Planning and Zoning for the Village of Mount Prospect presented the proposed amendment to Section 14.107, which was continued from the January 9th meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals in order to clarify the language of this proposed text amendment. This amendment would 'grandfather' in lots less than the required width or area if they are existing lots and are compatible with the neighborhood. Zoning Board member John Green and Steve Park drafted the following language, which would add a new paragraph D to Section 14.107: Section 14.107.D. Any existing lot properly subdivided as defined by this Ordinance, which does not meet the lot width or area requirement, and is currently zoned R -X, R -A, or R-1 shall be allowed to have permits issued for construction of a single family residence or other permitted or special use, provided: 1. The residence shall meet all other requirements of this Chapter; ZBA 2-V-86 Page 2 of 2 February 13, 1986 2. The lot in question shall not have been relied upon by adjacent properties, whether currently under separate or common ownership, for compliance with the requirements of this Chapter; and 3. The lot in question is representative of other lots in the neighborhood and does not differ significantly, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, in lot width or area from other similarly situated properties in the general area. Members of the Zoning Board gave an example of their concern relative to the proposed language that a party with a lot 45 feet wide, or possibly less, could request a building permit and depending on who the "Zoning Administrator* was at the time, might be able to obtain such a permit. - Mr. Park explained that there are several check and balance points within the staff and that such an instance could not take place unless it indeed met all the requirements, including the fact that the lot would have to have existed prior to a building permit request. It was suggested by members of the Zoning Board that a minimum width of 50 feet be placed in the proposed text to clarify the intent and reduce subjectivity. Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mrs., Brothers, moved to approve the text amendment, as proposed herein. Upon roll call: Ayes: Brettrager4 Brothers, Cassidy, Basnik Nays: None Motion carried. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for consideration. Carol A., Fields Recording Secretary Village of Maunt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois pi INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: STEPHEN M. PARK, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-2-A-86, TEXT AMENDMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 3, 1986 After meeting with John Green, the proposed text amendment grandfathering undersized lots has been -revised. The complete revised text is indicated below with the two modest changes - clarifications underlined. Amend Section 14.107. by adding a new Subsection D to read as follows: 14.107.D. Any existing lot properly subdivided as defined by this Ordinance, which does not meet the lot width or lot area requirement, and is currently zoned R -X, R -A, or R-1 shall be allowed to have permits issued for construction of a single family residence or other permitted or sgecial use, provided: 1. The residence shall meet all other requirements of this Chapter; 2. The lot in question shall not have been relied upon by adjacent properties, whether currently under separate or common ownership, for compliance with the requirements of this Chapter. 3. The lot in question is representative of other lots in the neighborhood and does not differ significantly, as determined by the Zoning Administrator, in lot width or area from other, I similarly situated properties in the general area. Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD,-VILLAGE-MANAGER FROM: STEPHEN M. PARK, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING 45; SUBJECT: ZBA-2-A-86, TEXT AMENDMENT - 14.107 DATE: JANUARY 30, 1986 At the Village Board meeting of January 21, Trustee Farley inquired whether the Village could require a simple majority to override the Zoning Board of Appeals on variations and special use cases. I have since contacted Dave Newman and asked for his interpretation of the Home Rule Authority in this regard. It is his opinion that the Village Board, as a home rule unit, can require a different vote to override the Zoning Board of Appeals than the statute. The special use provision for an override vote is already a function of the Home Rule Authority rather than of State law. It is his opinion that the two votes should be -the same to ensure that there is no confusion or possible taint to due process. The rationale behind the extraordinary vote of the Village Board is intended to place emphasis on the Zoning Board of Appeals recommendation. They are the group that holds the actual public hearing and considers the specific evidence based upon testimony of the applicant. It is for this reason that the zoning laws typically provide for a 2/3 vote of the Board to place more emphasis on the fact finding body who has the benefit of a more detailed review. SMP:'hg � ° MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING 80ARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE No. 2-A-86_ Hearing Date: January 9° 1988 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect PUBLICATION DATE: December 24, 1985 REQUEST: Text Amendments: l. Section 21.601.C.2 to permit a 6 ft fence along exterior side yards when they abut a major arterial. 2. Sections 14.606.0 and 14.706,C to make the vote necessary by the Village tooverride the Zoning Board of Appeals consistent as it applies to variations and special uses. 3. Section 14.2602.8 to clarify the definition of required off-street parking space. 4. Section 14.107 to 'grandfather' lots less than the required width - for existing lots. ~ G, Section 14.806,C to require official objections to ZBA cases to be filed with the applicant and attorney, as well as the Village Clerk, as presently provided for. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Baanih, Chairman Luis Brothers Ronald Cassidy John Green Marilyn 8'May Len Petrucelli ZBA MEMBER ABSENT: Robert 8rwttrager OBJECTORS/INTERESTED None PARTIES: Steve Park, Director of Planning and Zoning for the Village of Mount ZBA 2 -A -S6 Page 2 of Prospect presented this.cuse, consisting of 5 proposed text amendments. �\ Mr. Park stated the first amendment—foot fences al ong arterial streets. At present the Code permit 6 foot fences when the rear property Tin abuts �n arterial �t" "=~ _ not ~ -- to Section 21°601.C~2 would permit G foot high fences for corner apply �o corner / ^ lots in this situation. The proposed amendment is' am follows* | 1. "Section 21.601.C.2 If place along therear or ex,te,rior sidelot line when such rear or exterior side li ne a- road as defined by the ' f Mount the Village v oun prospect, and provided ~°^'''~~`^~''- �— � imaintained that a onefoot (11) setback s from the road right-of-way line." The subject of amending the [ode to increase the height of fences from 5 to 6 feet was brought up by members of the Zoning Board of Appeals who have expressed interest in that subject. It was stated that the Village Board did not support such an amendment. The next text amendment deals with the inconsistent votes required by the Village Board when considering overriding the recommendation to deny the Zoning Board of Appeals it relates to variations and " favorable vote of --'���-u�es -Preseo�ly�th� � requires .,.a avura e v spec�u , ~ ' ~~~~ Presently the t of the Village." for two-thirds (2/3) of all e | ees . variations and" .. a favorablevote ^ of two thirds (2/3) of all of the members of the ^resident -an- Board- �of Trustees of the Village." The proposed text amendment would make both sections consistent, as follows: , . ( 2. "Section 14.606,C � Any proposed variation n Zoning.Board of Appeals . to the President and Board of Trustees or the Village shall not be granted except by a favorable -vote of two-thirds (2/31_q -f all of the members of MR - "Section 14.705.C. proposedAny special use which fails to receive the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals, i,n the form of a favorable recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village shall not be granted except by a favorable vote of of Trustees I -age." The'third proposed amendment is to clarify the definition of � ZBA 2-A-86 Page 3 of off-street parking. The proposed wording would eliminate any doubt when it becomes necessary for the Police Department to enforce parking on the grass in front yards, etc. The proposed wording is as follows: 3. "Section 14.2602.6 A parking area nine feet by twenty feet (9' x 20'). Such space shall be exclusive of access, drives, ramps and aisles, and shall be located on the same lot that it serves, or within one thousand feet (1,000') of the premises served as provided in this Chapter. Parking_of vehicles or trailers, must be located upon an approved surface of asphalt or concrete, which must be --� constructed in accordance with a a ace (;odes. No oarkino or crass. Mr. Park presented the fourth proposed text amendment to 'grandfather' lots less than the required width or area if they are existing lots and are compatible with the neighborhood. Zoning Board member John Green requested this text amendment be held over in order to clarify the wording in order to take more possibilities into consideration. It was the opinion of the Zoning Board of Appeals that this text amendment would be continued to their next regular meeting. The final text amendment proposed would bring the local Code into conformance with State Statute by providing for notification of the petitioner and attorney for the petitioner when an official objection is filed to a pending case before the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Code presently provides for written protest to be filed with the Village Clerk. The proposed amendment to the text is as follows: 5. "Section 14.806.0 In case of a written protest against any proposed amendment, signed and acknowledged by the owners of twenty percent (20%) of the frontage proposed to be altered, or by the owners of twenty percent (20%) of the frontage immediately adjacent or across an alley therefrom, or by the owners of twenty percent (20%) of the frontage directly opposite the frontage proposed to be altered, is filed with the Village Clerk, the proposed amendment shall not be passed except by a favorable vote of two-thirds (2/3) of all ZBA 2-A-86 Puqe ^ of 4 of the members of the President and Trustees of the Village. In sucN cases, a _copy of the w7—it-ten protest shal I bi__-§erV4d by the protestor or RroteStOrS On the applicant for th' it any, by Members of t»e Zoning Board of Appeals stated that" they agreed with all the recommended text amendments with the exception of #4, dealing with 'grandfathering' existing lots less that the required width or - area, which will be held over to the next regular meeting in order for the verbage to be changed for clarification. ' Mrs- Brothers, seconded by Mr. Green, moved to recommend opprov,al of the proposed text amendments I,-2° 3° and 5 as presented and to continue text amendment 4 to the next meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Brutherx,,Cassiuy, Green, 8'May,. PetrumeTli,, Basnih Nays: None Motion carried. , Thisrecummendativn will be forwarded to the Village Board for consideration at their January 21st meeting. ' Carol A. Fields Recording Secretary Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 23 TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: STEPHEN M. PARK, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING �aov_ SUBJECT: ZBA-2-A-86, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DATE: JANUARY 2, 1986 This text amendment would alter several sections of the Fence and Zoning Ordinance to address issues that have been raised over the past year. The amendments are as follows: 1. We propose to change the Fence Code to allow a 6 foot high fence along an exterior side lot line when the property abuts an arterial road. The Code currently allows a 6 foot fence along the rear property line when the lot abuts an arterial but does not for a side yard. All other conditions of the Fence Code would apply to the location of fences. if a corner lot has frontage on both a residential street and an arterial, a 6 foot fence could not be placed along that arterial without this amendment. 2. There are currently two standards requiring an override vote of the Village Board if the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends against an application One requires four of the six Trustees, and the other requires five of the seven members of the Board. This would standardize the two sections to require five of the seven Trustees. This would amend Sections 14.606.0 and 14.705.C. 3. The third text amendment is an addition to the de- finition of "off-street parking space." Although it has always been held that required parking must be on an improved surface and not upon grass or dirt; the Police - Department has asked for the Ordinance to explicitly state this requirement. We are therefore amending Section 14.2602.B "Off -Street Parking Space" to specifically identify this requirement, to assist in enforcement. Gil Basnik - Page Two January 2, 1986 4. We are proposing an addition to the Ordinance, Section 14.107.D, which would allow existing lots which do not meet either the lot width or lot area requirement to have permits issued without a variation. There are several proposed limitations. We are most concerned that the lots are typical of the neighborhood and are not substandard from the general area. Secondly, we propose that they be limited if adjacent properties have relied upon this vacant lot for compliance with the requirements. If the side yard required included this vacant parcel, or if the lot were the location of a garage for an adjacent property, permits would not be permitted. Finally, we propose that the residence must meet all other requirements of the Zoning Ordinance. 5. The final text amendment proposed is to bring our Code into conformance with the State Statute regarding written protests by adjacent properties. There is a provision of the ordinance which would require the higher percentage of the Village Board to approve a rezoning if owners of 20% of the frontage file a written objection. The State law was changed to require that written protest to be served on the applicant and his attorney in addition to receipt by the Village Clerk. This change in the Statute is to ensure that the applicant has full knowledge of all actions taken regarding his application and is in the interest of due process and fairness to all parties involved in zoning cases. These amendments represent several changes proposed by staff to begin the process of "cleaning up" the Zoning Ordinance. Throughout the winter months, where the agenda permits, we will be filing several text amendments along these lines and of a more substantive nature. SMP:hg Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: TERRANCE L. BURGHARD, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: STEPHEN M. PARK, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-2-A-86, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DATE: JANUARY 10, 1986 We have proposed several text amendments to the Zoning Ordinance and the Fence Code. The text amendments were recommended for approval by the Zoning Board of Appeals at their January 9, 1986 public hearing by a vote of 6-0. They asked that one text amendment be continued to further discuss possible language changes. The following are the four text amendments that were recommended for approval: 1. Six foot fences would be allowed along.exterior side yards when the yard abuts an arterial. Currently, they are allowed in these rear yards but a corner lot is not covergd. 2. The text amendment of the ordinance would be clarified to require 2/3 of all of the members of the President and Board of Trustees to vote in favor of a variation or a special use, if the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denial. Currently, there are two different votes required for these two cases. 3. A text amendment is proposed to assist the enforcement officers with respect to off-street parking. This amendment would explicitly state that parking on grass and dirt is against the Code. 4. The text of the ordinance is proposed to be changed to make it consistent with State law. in a rezoning, an `'official" objection must be filed with the Village Clerk to require the super -majority of the Village Board to approve a case. State law requires that this written objection also be sent, by certified mail, to the applicant and his attorney. SMP: hg Since Arthur Street is located within the corporate limits of Arlington Heights and, as such, the curb cuts necessary to implement the proposal must be approved by Arlington Heights. The petitioner has scheduled a meeting with representatives of Arlington Heights to present this proposal, therefore this case is continued to the February 4th meeting of the Village Board. ZBA 1-V-86, 1101 West Lincoln ZBA 13 A Resolution was presented that acknowledges` the various CABLE` financial dealings of Cablenet Association. Trustee Van Geem left the meeting for a few minutes at this point. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for RES.NO.2-8E passage of Resolution No. 2-86 A RESOLUTION APPROVING EFFORTS OF CABLENET ASSOCIATES TO INCREASE ITS WORKING CAPITAL TO PROVIDE BETTER SERVICE TO CABLE FRANCHISE COMMUNITIES Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 78-V-85, 1800 W. Central Road (Multigraphics) ZBA 78 -V -8E This case deals with a request to allow the 30 foot side MULTIGRAPH: yard along Arthur Street to be used for truck parking and 2-A-86 truck loading. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended AMEND CH.. approving this request by a vote of 6-0. Since Arthur Street is located within the corporate limits of Arlington Heights and, as such, the curb cuts necessary to implement the proposal must be approved by Arlington Heights. The petitioner has scheduled a meeting with representatives of Arlington Heights to present this proposal, therefore this case is continued to the February 4th meeting of the Village Board. ZBA 1-V-86, 1101 West Lincoln ZBA 1-V-86 The petitioner is this case is requesting a variation to 1101 W.LINCO permit a garage 636 sq. ft. in size. The Code permits a maximum of 600 sq. ft. It was noted that this single family home does not have a basement and the additional room is needed to store the usual yard equipment and 2 cars. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of this request by a vote of 5-0, provided no additional structures are permitted. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals in Case No. ZBA 1-V-86. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Van Geem returned to the meeting at this point. ZBA 2-A-86, Text Amendments ZBA 2-A-86 The following text amendments were heard by the Zoning AMEND CH.. Board of Appeals: 1. To permit a 6 foot fence on corner lots when the lot abuts an arterial street; 2. Making the votes consistent in both variation and special use requests when the Village Board overrides a denial by the Zoning Board of Appeals; 3. To clarify the language for off-street parking; 4. To grandfather lots less than the required width or area; and 5. To require official notification to petitioner and petitioner's attorney. p;,ne 7 - ,lan-iary 21, 1936 0 ~~ � The Zoning Board of Appeals held item #4 for further verbage clarification, but did vote to recommend approval of items l, 2, 3, and 6. Trustee Farley requested additional information on item #2, as to whether the State Statutes require a specific vote, namely a 'super majority' or if a 'simple majority' would be permitted if the Village Board opts to override the Zoning Board of Appeals recommendation. This question will be presented to the Yillage Attorney and his response will be presented at the February 4th meeting, Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals to amend the text, items 1, 3, and 5,as specified above. P a q e 8 - Jan,ary 2l` 19S6 Upon roll call: Ayes : Arthur, Farley, Florus, Murauskis" Van Geem, Wattenberg Mays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would approve corrective actin* of the MSD relative to inflow/infiltration. This subject was discussed at the Committee of the Whole meeting held January 14th, RES.MD'3-86 MSD Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Resolution No. 3-86 A RESOLUTION APPROVING OF THE INFLOW/INFILTRATION CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM OF THE METROPOLITAN SANITARY DISTRICT OF GREATER CHICAGO Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Fluros, Murausk1 Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize execution of an agreement with the Federal Reserve Dank of Chicago as a depository. R[S.NU.4-86 Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to DEPOSITORY passage of Resolution No, 4-86 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A CUSTODY AGREEMENT WITH THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Rorus, Murauskis, Van Geem" Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize the First Nat ional Bank of Mount Prospect as n depository. / Trustee Fluros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem° moved fo/ RE5.NO.6-86 passage of Resolution No. 5-86 DEPOSITORY A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING AN ESCROW DEPOSIT WITH THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll cal): Ayes: Arthur, Furley, Flnrns, Murauskis, Van Gaem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. P a q e 8 - Jan,ary 2l` 19S6 ORD.N0.3605 Trustee' Farley, seconded by Trust—^ Arthur, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 3605 AM ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS l101 W. LINCOLN 5T, Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Flnros, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 2-A-86 ZDA 2-A-86, Text Amendments An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND.CH.14 amend the text of Chapter 14 (Zoning) to include the following: 1. To permit a 6 foot fence on corner lots when the lot abuts an arterial street; 2. To clarify the language for off-street parking; 3- To require official notification to petitioner and petitioner's attorney. This Ordinance will be presented February 18th for second reading. Also presented as a part of Z8A 2-A-86 was a proposed text amendment to have a consistent vote in both special use and variation caseSin the event the Village Board wanted to override the Zoning Board of Appeals decision to deny a request, The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended this text amendment by a vote of 6-0. ` There was discussion as to whether the vote required by the Village Board to override a recommendation to deny should be a 'super majority' or 'simple majority'. Following the discussion, it was the consensus of opinion that the required vote should be "2/3 of the President and Board of Trustees present and voting", An Ordinance will be prepared and presented for first reading at the February 18th meeting. Z8X 76 -SU -86 & ZBA 76-5U-86 and ZRA 77'V-85" 15 N. Elmhurst Avenue. IDA 77-Y-86 This case involves a request for a special use to permit 15 N'ELMHURST AVE u professional office building and use on the same lot as a single family residence, and a variation to reduce the rear yard from 20 feet to 10 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting both requests by a vote of 6-U. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the special use and variation reqoeuted. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis° Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading on February 18th. SELL VILLAGE An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would OWNED PROPERTY: set forth the bid notice relative to the sale of ] lots L0NmQUIST BLVD, owned by the Village on Lonnquist Boulevard at We Gu Trail. ' Page 6 - February 4, 1986 COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. Page 2 - February lO, 1986 MAYOR'S REPORT RALPH ITADLEK: Mayor Krause presented a plaque to Ralph Stadler, who is VOLUNTEER FIRE- celebrating his 40th Anniversary in the volunteer fire MAN service . Mr. Stadler complimented the Mount Prospect Fire Department on their many achievements over the years. AMEND CH,13 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would create one additional Class "S" liquor license for the WATERFALL Waterfall Restaurant, 1706 S. Elmhurst Road (formerly RESTAURANT known as Kallens). The Class "S" liquor license is CLASS "5" conditioned on the restaurant having only one bar where alcoholic beverages may be purchase. An oyster bar, as proposed by the petitioner, will be treated as table service only. NEN BUSINESS 38A 73-V-85 ZBX 73-V-85, 606 S. Busse Road 606 S.BUSSE RD, An Ordinance was presented for second reading that would allow a carport in the required front yard and a variation to permit both u garage and carport on this lot where the Code only permits one structure. The Zoning Board of Appeals is final on the variation to permit the encroachment into the front yard however Village Board action is required on the request to permit both structures. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approving both variations by votes of 6-0. An opinion was received from a structural engineer as to whether the existing supports would hold the new roof on this carport type structure. Due to clarification of the engineer's opinion, this matter was continued to the April 1st meeting of the Village 8oard, AMEND CH.14 An Ordinance was presented for second reading that would amend the text of Chapter 14 (Zoning) to IBA 24-86 include the following: I. To permit a 6 foot fence on corner lots when the lot abuts an arterial street; 2. To clarify the language for off-street parking; 3. To require official notification to petitioner and petitioner's attorney. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approving these amendments by votes of 6-0. OKD,N0.361O Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Ordinance No, 3610. AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING" AND CHAPTER 21 ARTICLE VI ENTITLED "FENCES" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE ZONING AND FENCE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Van Ceem^ Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried, Page 2 - February lO, 1986 Also presented as a part of ZBA 2-A-86, was an Ordinance Z84 2-A-86 for first reading that would amend the text of Chapter 14 AMEND CH.14 relative to the votes required by the Village Board in order to override a recommendation to deny by the Zoning AMEND CH,10 Board of Appeals. This Ordinance will be presented for second reading on Murch 4th, ZBA 76 -SU -85 and ZBA 77-V-85, 15 N. Elmhurst Avenue. ZBA 76-SU'86 & An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would ZBA 77'V-86 grant a request for a special use to permit a professional lS N.ELMHURST A` office building and a single family residence on the same lot, and a variation to reduce the rear yard from 20 feet to lO feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting both requests by a vote of 6-0. There was discussion of the type of signage permitted for AMEND CH. lZ this parcel, which will contain more than one use. The petitioner stated that he would agree to the condition . being incorporated into the Ordinance that only an identification wall sign would be permitted and that a free standing sign would be prohibited. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to MSD: waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance in SANITARY SEWERS order to take action of the subject Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes -Arthur, Farley, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for OR0.NO.3611 passage of Ordinance No, 3611. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING 8 VARIATION AND SPECIAL USE PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 15 M. ELMHURST AVENUE Upon roll call: Ayes:&rthur, Furley, Van 6eem, Wattenberg Nays:None Motion carried. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND CH,10 amend Chapter 10 entitled "Licenses and Permits" of the Village Code, This Ordinance reflects amendments in conjunction with the increased business license fees and verbage. Also presented for first reading was an Ordinance to amend AMEND CH.11 Chapter ll entitled "Merchants, Businesses, Occupations, and Amusements" of the Village Code, This Ordinance amends certain verbage as well as increases certain license fees. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND CH. lZ amend Chapter 12 entitled "Food Code" of the Village Code. This Ordinance is also in conjunction with the 2 preceeding Ordinances relative to the increased license fees and certain verbage amendments. These 3 Ordinances will be presented March 4th for 2nd readings. A Resolution was presented, as required by the MSD: Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater Chicago SANITARY SEWERS was presented. Page 3 - February 18, 1986 , ^ An Ordinance was pr��'sented for second" reading-t-hat would AMEND CH. l create one additional Class "S" liquor license for the CLASS "S" Waterfall Restaurant, 1796 S. Elmhurst Road (formerly known WATERFALL as Kallens). The Class "S" liquor license is 1798 S.ELM conditioned on the restaurant having only one bar where alcoholic beverages may he purchase. An oyster ba,, as proposed by the petitioner, will be treated as table service only, Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for ORD.NU.3614 passage of Ordinance No, 3614 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE ! Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Fluros, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried, NEN BUSINESS ZBA 78-V-85, 1800 West Central Road (Multigraphics) ZBA 78-Y-81 This case, continued from the last Board meeting, deals with MULTICRAPH� a request to allow the existing 30 foot side yard along Arthur Street to be used for truck parking and loading. Due to the fact that Arthur Street is located within the Village of Arlington Heights, that municipality would have to grant permission on curb cuts to permit the request. The petitioner has now informed the Village of Mount Prospect that the Arlington Heights administration has denied permission, therefore at the request of the petitioner, this case is withdrawn' ZBA 2-V-86, Text Amendment ZBA 2-V-86 An Ordinance was presented for 2nd reading that would make AMEND CH,11 the votes consistent in both variation and special use X requests in order for the Village Board to override a � recommendation to deny from the Zoning Board of Appeals. Trustee Farley stated that he would favor a simple majority (2/3) vote rather than the proposed which would require 6 of the 7 members of the Village Board in attendance at the time of the vote. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved for ORD.N0.361[ passage of Ordinance No. 3615 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING" OF,THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS TO PROVIDE FOR CERTAIN CHANGES TO THE ZONING CODE AMEND CH.1i Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to amend the proposed Ordinance to provide for the simple majority vote of 2/3 in order to override o denial by the Zoning Board of Appeals' The following vote was taken on the amended motion: Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Van Geem Mays: Arthur, F\orns^ Murauskis" � Wattenberg Notion failed, The following vote was taken on the original motion to pass the Ordinance as presented: Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Floruu, Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: Farley Motion carried' Page 3 - March 4' 1986