Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout4371_001Next Ordinance No. 4382 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Next Resolution No. 1-92 A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D 3 R 0 P B U 8 1 N E 8 B REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Meeting ROOM, 1st Floor Tuesday senior Citizen Center January 7, 1992 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. X. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER 11. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald 008kip" Parley Trustee Mark Buses Trustee Leo Floros Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks III. INVOCATION - Trustee Cloves IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, December 17, 1991, V. APPROVAL OF BILLS Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. Presentation of the 3rd grade curriculum -initiated by the Mount Prospect Historical Society. VIII. OLD BUSINESS ALL A. ZBA 74-A-91 and ZBA 75 -SU -91, 1611 Algonquin Road 1. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 14 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance amends Chapter 14 to allow archery and firearm shooting and target ranges safety and marksmanship training, including accessory retail uses, as a Special Use in the I-1 (Light Industrial) District. The Zoning Board of -Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit A) 2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1611 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD This Ordinance grants a Special Use to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail uses at , 1611 West Algonquin Road. The'Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B) B. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance amends Section 18.2007 of Chapter 18 by deleting the prohibition of parking on Sunday on the 200 block of South Pine Street, Church. The Safety Commission adjacent to St. Mark recommended granting this request. (Exhibit C) C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE PLACING A QUESTION OF PUBLIC POLICY ON THE BALLOT FOR THE MARCH 17, 1992 ELECTION This Ordinance asks users of the Citizens Utilities North Suburban Water System, located within Wheeling this Township if they would approve the purchase of (Exhibit D) private water system. D. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING To THE REDEVELOPMENT OF REAL ESTATE WITHIN (Exhibit E) THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS E. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ELIGIBILITY REPORT AND TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT (Exhibit F) IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS F. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING (Exhibit G) THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA G. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE FOR THE (Exhibit H) TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Iv. NEW A. BUSINESS 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Ordinance authorizes execution of an agreement to purchase property commonly (Exhibit J) known as loo West Northwest Highway B. ZBA 76-V-91, 418 south Emerson Street The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a 1.71 side yard setback to accommodate an existing deck. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. C. ZBA 77 -SU -91, Walmart - Mount Prospect Plaza The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use to permit a 51 loll diameter satellite antenna on the roof of their new store. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the special Use by a vote of 7-0. D. ZBA 79-V-91, 2016 East Euclid Avenue is requesting a variation to The Petitioner allow a zero foot building setback from the interior lot line, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended a 5 foot setback; a variation to allow a 10 foot building setback from the rear property line, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended a 15 foot setback; a variation to allow a parking to zero feet from Zoning Board the front and side lot lines, the of Appeals recommended zero feet to the front and side and 10 feet from the side lot line; and a variation to allow 78% lot coverage, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request. E. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Resolution authorizes the annual agreement for fire and ambulance services for the Forest River Fire Protection District. (Exhibit K) X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 TO APRIL 30, 1992 (Exhibit L) B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 TO APRIL 30, 1992 (Exhibit M) C. Bid Results: 1. Containment style dual fill station air breathing systems for firefighters D. Request authorization to issue $4,375,000 in Bonds.and authorize agreements with R. V. Norene & Association as financial advisors and Kattin, Muchin and Zavis as bond counsel. E. Request to retain consultant for enhancement to Village employee retirement benefits F. Status Report XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DECEMBER 17, 1991 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee George Clowes Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Irvana Wilks INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Busse. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved APPROVE to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MINUTES Mayor and Board of Trustees held December 3, 1991. Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Pass: Busse Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved APPROVE BILIS to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Risk Management Fund Vehicle Replacement Fund Motor Equipment Pool Fund Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep. Fund Downtown Redev. Const. Fund Fire & Police Building Const. Flood Control Revenue Fund Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - Debt Service Funds 366,133 Flexcomp Trust Fund 6,866 Escrow Deposit Fund 72,196 Police Pension Fund - Firemen's Pension Fund - Benefit Trust Fund 2,167 $2,493,652 989,729 22,461 12,121 74,470 728,214 4,349 133,152 13,578 14,096 16,940 37,180 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to accept the financial report dated November 30, 1991, subject to audit. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to authorize the new owners of the Holiday Inn, located on East Rand Road, to continue operation under the existing Class I'M" liquor license. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 2 - December 17, 1991 MAYOR'S REPORT VILLAGE Mayor Farley extended birthday wishes to Village MANAGER'S Manager John Dixon. BIRTHDAY A Resolution was presented extending Holiday Greetings HOLIDAY SEASON to the community. RES.NO. 41-91 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of Resolution No. 41-91 A RESOLUTION FOR THE HOLIDAY SEASON Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks, Farley Nays: None Motion carried. POLICE OFFICER Mayor Farley and Police Chief Pavlock presented the OF THE YEAR 1991 Police Officer of the Year and Runners -Up. AND RUNNERS-UP chief Pavlock announced that officer James Edwards was selected as police officer of the Year. Village Manager Dixon presented a check in the amount of $250.00 to officer Edwards. The following members of the Police Department were runners-up: Officer Ted Gorski: Investigator Robert Riordan Investigator Robert Rzepecki HOLIDAY INN It was noted that the new owners of the Holiday Inn LIQUOR LICENSE have requested permission to continue operating under the existing Class I'M" liquor license. This request was received after the agenda had been established. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to consider an item not listed on the agenda. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to authorize the new owners of the Holiday Inn, located on East Rand Road, to continue operation under the existing Class I'M" liquor license. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 2 - December 17, 1991 OLD BUSINESS ZBA 71-V-91, 202 South Pine Street An ordinance was presented for first reading that would allow replacing an existing garage located 21 4-1/211 from the side lot line. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4374 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 202 SOUTH PINE STREET Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 72-V-91, 1100 Ardyce Lane An ordinance was presented for first reading that would grant a variation allowing an existing 29 foot wide driveway to be replaced. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for passage of ordinance No. 4375 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1100 ARDYCE LANE Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 73-V-91, 902 Feehanville Drive An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would grant a variation to allow an existing utility transformer pad to encroach 8 feet into the required 30 foot front yard. The Zoning Page 3 - December 17, 1991 ZBA 71-V-91 202 S.PINE ORD.NO. 4374 ZBA 72-V-91 1100 ARDYCE IN ORD.NO. 4375 ZBA 73-V-91 902 FEEHANVIIZZ Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0, provided landscaping is planted to Also presented for first reading was an Ordinance granting a Special Use to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail uses, as well as a target range and safety and marksmanship training at the subject property, zoned I-1. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0, subject to several conditions. This Ordinance will be presented January 7, 1992 for second reading. NEW BUSINESS SAFETY COMM. The following recommendations were received from the RECOMMENDATIONS: Safety Commission: PINE ST - The request of residents to permit Sunday parking on SUNDAY PARKING the 200 block of South Pine Street, which was remanded back to the Safety Commission by the Village 'Board, was considered. It was the recommendation of the Safety Commission to concur with the request of the residents and allow parking on Sundays on the 200 block of South Pine Street. Page 4 - December 17, 1991 screen the transformer. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks Nays: Hoefert Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4376 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4376 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 902 FEERANVILLE DRIVE Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 74-A-91 ZBA 74-A-91 and ZBA 75 -SU -91,.1611 Algonquin Road ZBA 75 -SU -91 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 1611 ALGONQUIN would amend Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) to include archery and firearm shooting as well as target ranges, safety and marksmanship training, along with accessory retail uses as a Special Use in the I -I (Light Industrial) District. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. This Ordinance will be presented January 7, 1992 for second reading. Also presented for first reading was an Ordinance granting a Special Use to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail uses, as well as a target range and safety and marksmanship training at the subject property, zoned I-1. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0, subject to several conditions. This Ordinance will be presented January 7, 1992 for second reading. NEW BUSINESS SAFETY COMM. The following recommendations were received from the RECOMMENDATIONS: Safety Commission: PINE ST - The request of residents to permit Sunday parking on SUNDAY PARKING the 200 block of South Pine Street, which was remanded back to the Safety Commission by the Village 'Board, was considered. It was the recommendation of the Safety Commission to concur with the request of the residents and allow parking on Sundays on the 200 block of South Pine Street. Page 4 - December 17, 1991 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Safety Commission and amend the Traffic Code (Chapter 18) by deleting the prohibition of Sunday parking on the 200 block of South Pine Street. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An ordinance amending Chapter 18 will be presented January 7th for first reading. At the request of Dick Hendricks, the Safety Commission MOUNT PROSPECT considered having crosswalks painted at pedestrian PLAZA - crossings within the Mount Prospect Plaza. CROSSWALKS Since the proposed crosswalks are located on private property it was the recommendation of the Safety Commission to contact the property owners and ask that specific areas have stripes painted designating A sidewalk or crosswalk. Mr. Hendricks asked that the Village establish a policy requiring all shopping centers and/or industrial complexes to paint striped crosswalks. Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Safety Commission and have the administration ask representatives of the Plaza to provide painted crosswalks. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. At the request of the administration, the Safety Commission considered prohibiting parking on the east side of Maple Street between Northwest Highway and Central Road. This request was made in order to have easier access for emergency vehicles following the construction of the new Fire and Police Station. It was the recommendation of the Safety commission to grant the request. Trustee Busse asked if the residents living on that portion of Maple Street being the subject of this discussion were invited to the Safety commission meeting. Since it was unclear as to whether the residents knew of this proposed change in the parking, it was the opinion of the Board that this matter be deferred to the January 7th meeting in order to provide time to notify the residents. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would establish an advisory referendum question to'be placed on the March 17, 1992 ballot asking the users of the Citizens Utilities Water System in Wheeling Township if they would be willing to purchase that water system. Page 5 - December 17, 1991 PARKING MAPLE ST. REFERENDUM QUESTION: PURCHASE CITIZENS UTILITIES WATER SYSTEM The question was asked as to the estimated cost to purchase the system. Village Manager Dixon stated that the estimated cost it $23,500,000, which amount would include the purchase price, improvements to the system and legal expenses involved. Trustee Wilks suggested the actual question be re- worded so that is would be clear that only those residents receiving water from the private utility would be responsible for the cost of purchasing the system. The following residents spoke on this subject: Earl Johnson, 1803 Camp Mc Donald Road Frank Vlazny, 2103 Jody Court Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson The suggested wording.change of the actual referendum question will be reviewed by legal counsel and this ordinance will be presented for second reading on January 7th. PUBLIC HEARING: Mayor Farley called a Public Hearing to order at TRIANGLE 9:00 PM for the purpose of considering the creation of REDEVELOPMENT the Triangle Redevelopment Project. Notice of the PROJECT Public Hearing was published in the Mount Prospect Herald on December 6, 1991. Attorney Barry Springer, representing the village, stated that the proposed project would allow the Village to purchase the Aldi building, 100 West Northwest Highway, located on the northeast corner of Northwest Highway and Pine Street, and would allow for this parcel to be included in the downtown redevelopment. Hal Predovich, Chairman of the Business Development and Redevelopment Commission spoke in support of this proposed project, which will be developed under the existing agreement with Broadacre. Fran Vlazny, 2130 Jody Court, voiced his concerns about this project. The following ordinances were presented for first readings in conjunction with the Public Hearing: An ordinance pertaining to the redevelopment of real estate within the Village of Mount Prospect; An ordinance approving the Triangle Redevelopment Project Eligibility Report and Triangle Redevelopment Project in the Village of Mount Prospect; An ordinance designating the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area An ordinance authorizing the acquisition of property through condemnation or otherwise for the Triangle Redevelopment Project These ordinances will be presented January 7th for second readings. There being no further discussion on this subject, Mayor Farley declared the Public Hearing closed at 9:20 P.M. Page 6 - December 17, 1991 Mayor Farley called a brief recess at 9:20 P.M. RECESS The meeting was reconvened at 9:30 P.M. Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley Trustee Busse Trustee Corcoran Trustee Clowes Trustee Floros Trustee Hoefert Trustee Wilks VILLAGE KANAGERIS REPORT Mayor Farley called a Public Hearing to order at PUBLIC 9:31 P.M. The purpose of the Public Hearing, HEARING: called pursuant to a legal notice having been ANNUAL published in the Mount Prospect Herald on LEVY December 4, 1991, was to consider the annual tax levies for fiscal year May 1, 1991 to April 30, 1992. ordinances relative to abatement and authorizing the levies were presented for second readings. Mayor Farley stated that the proposed levy for the Village reflects a 4.9% increase over the levy for last year. Trustees Clowes and Floros requested the Board reduce the levy so that it reflects a zero increase. It was the opinion of the Mayor and members of the Board that reducing the levy would probably result in a larger increase next year, which could create a hardship on the taxpayers of the Village. Frank Vlazny, 2103 Jody Court, stated that he supports maintaining the same levy amount as last year. Bill Blaine, President of the Mount Prospect Public Library, gave a brief explanation of the levy for the Library. There being no further discussion on this subject, Mayor Farley declared the Public Hearing closed at 10:23 P.M. Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for ORD.NO. 4377 passage of Ordinance No. 4377 AN ORDINANCE TO ABATE A PART OF THE TAXES LEVIED FOR CORPORATE AND MUNICIPAL PURPOSES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 1992 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks, Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO. 4378 Page 7 - December 17, 1991 for passage of Ordinance No. 4378 AN ORDINANCE TO ABATE PART OF THE TAXES LEVIED FOR UNLIMITED TAX BONDS OF SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 1, SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 2, SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 5, AND SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 6 OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 1992 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4379 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4379 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF TAXES FOR CORPORATE"AND MUNICIPAL PURPOSES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 1992 Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to amend the proposed Ordinance by reducing the total by $281,628 from the levy for Capital Improvements. Upon roll call on the motion to amend: Ayes: Clowes, Floros Nays: Busse, Corcoran, Hoefert, Wilks Motion failed. Upon roll call on the main motion: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: Clowes, Floros Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4380 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4380 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE LEVY AND COLLECTION OF TAXES FOR THE MUNICIPAL PURPOSES OF SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 1, SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 2, SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 5, AND SPECIAL SERVICE AREA NUMBER 6 OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS FOR THE FISCAL YEAR BEGINNING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 1992 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. BUDGET An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMENDMENT make certain amendments to the annual budget adopted for fiscal year commencing May 1, 1991 to April 30, 1992. It was noted that the proposed amendments are necessary due to a change in priorities and/or new projects have been authorized which affected the budget as adopted. Page 8 - December 17, 1991 This Ordinance will be presented January 7th for second reading. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that BUDGET amend the 1991/1992 budget by separating the refuse AMENDMENT disposal revenues and expenditures into a separate fund. This Ordinance will be presented January 7th for second reading. A Resolution was presented expressing the intent INTENTION of the Village to expend funds for specified purposes TO REIMBURSE which fund accounts will be reimbursed when general obligation bonds are issued in 1992. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved RES.NO. 42-91 for passage of Resolution No. 42-91 A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE INTENTION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO REIMBURSE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND FOR CERTAIN EXPENDITURES DURING THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 1992 FROM THE PROCEEDS OF BONDS TO BE ISSUED IN 1992 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The following proposals were received for the annual AUDIT audit for the Village based on a 4 year commitment PROPOSALS and provided the Village provides pencil copies to the auditor: Wolf & Company $63,350 Pandolfi, Topolski 65,500 KPMG Peat Marwick 69,800 McGladrey & Pullen 71,975 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved WOLF & CO. to concur with the recommendation of the administration and authorize entering into a 4 year contract with Wolf & Company to perform the annual audit for the Village. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. The following proposals were received to conduct ACTUARIAL: an actuarial valuation of the Police and Fire FIRE & Pension Funds for 1991 through 1995: POLICE PENSIONS Police Fire Goldstein & Associates $ 9,000 $ 9,000 Miller, Mason & Dixon 12,000 12,000 Page 9 - December 17, 1991 GOLDSTEIN & Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Wilke, moved ASSOCIATES to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the proposal from Goldstein & Associates to conduct actuarial valuations for both the Fire and Police Pension Funds, for the years 1991 through 1995 at a cost not to exceed $18,000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. INSURANCE Proposals were received to provide insurance coverage PROPOSALS for the Village. Various items were considered, such as the deductibles, insurance limit and premium costs. It was the recommendation of the administration to adopt the following coverage from the companies noted: Company/ Insurance Coverage Limit Deductible Premium A.J.Gallagher Law Enforcement $1,000,000 $ 250,000 Auto Liability ~1,000,000 250f000 $78,830 General Liability 1,000,000 250,000 Hobbs Group Public officials $1f000,000 $ 250,000 $17,010 Workers' Comp, Statutory 300,000 39,836 Paramedic Lia. 1,000,000 250 5,221 Property Ins, 22,000f000 25,000 23,609 HELP Pool $5,000,000 $1,000,000 72,000 Total Premium $236,506 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowesf moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and authorize the insurance coverage as noted with the total annual premium of $236,506. Upon roll call: Ayes: Bussef Cloweef Corcoran, Floras, Wilks Nays: None Pass: Hoefert Motion carried. SENIOR CENTER A request was presented for a change work order to ELECTRICAL increase the contract with Gibson Electric by $3,629 SUPPLY and provide 600 AMP service rather than the existing 400 AMP at the Senior Citizen Center. Village Manager Dixon asked that this matter be withdrawn from the agenda. Mr. Dixon stated that the building may undergo some remodeling which would change the requirement for electrical service. TELEPHONE A request was presented to authorize the development CONSULTANTS of specifications for a new telephone system for all Village offices in conjunction with the construction of the new Fire and Police Station. Page 10 - December 17, 1991 The following proposals were received: Telecom Services Group $ 6,560.00 Charles R. Hardy & Associates 11,000.00 Karen Gold 13,600.00* Donohue Telecommunciations Group 15,618.00 Patrick M. Monahan 16,000.00 Pho-Net-Ex, Inc. 17,400.00 Comtrol Corp. 22,590.00 Telephone Management, Inc. 24,640.00 Graphidyne Communications 26,350.00 Dynatech 28,000.00 Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved TELECOM to concur with the recommendation of the SERVICES administration and accept the proposal submitted by GROUP Telecom Services Group to provide telephone consultant services at a cost not to exceed $6,560.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Village Manager Dixon presented the final cost CLEAN-UP for cleaning up the contamination at the site of COSTS: the Fire and Police Station, 112 E. Northwest Highway. FIRE & It was noted that when the building was removed an POLICE old fuel tank, which had been used for storing used STATION motor oil, was found to have leaked which created contaminated soil.- The cost to clean up the site totalled $129,782.88, which was $39,782.88 more than originally estimated. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to authorize payment of $129,782.88 as the total cost for demolition and clean-up of the site of the Fire and Police Station. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Mr. Dixon presented a Resolution that was not listed IEPA on the agenda, which Resolution would authorize LOAN the Village Manager to sign loan applications for APPLICATIONS the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA). Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to consider an item not listed on the agenda. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, RES.NO. 43-91 moved for passage of Resolution No. 43-91 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE VILLAGE MANAGER TO SIGN LOAN APPLICATIONS PERTAINING TO THE ILLINOIS ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 11 - December 17, 1991 DISCONNECT Village Manager Dixon informed the Mayor and Board LAW SUIT: that the Snuggery Restaurant (now known as Dumas DISMISS Walkers) on South Busse Road had filed a motion SNUGGERY to dismiss that property from the Disconnect Suit pending in court. ANY OTHER BUSINESS H.O.M.E. Trustee Busse stated that he was absent at the PROGRAM last meeting of the Village Board, December 3rd, at which time the Board took a vote to deny an AMEND CH. 8 amendment to Chapter 8, and he asked that the Board reconsider that action. The proposed amendment provided for anyone participating in the State of Illinois H.O.M.E program to be entitled to a rebate of $2.00 of every $3.00 paid for Real Estate Transfer Tax. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to reconsider the action taken December 3rd relative to an ordinance amending Chapter 8 in conjunction with the H.O.M.E. program and the Real Estate Transfer Tax. . Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Florob, Hoefert, Farley Nays: Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4381 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved fcr passage of ordinance No. 4381 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VIII OF CHAPTER 8 ENTITLED "REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floras, Hoefert, Farley Nays: Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks Motion carried. ZBA CASES Trustee Clowes stated that since the Board has been discussing voting requirements, he asked the Board to reduce the time a Petitioner must wait for final approval of the Ordinance for variations from the Zoning Ordinance. It was Trustee Clowes' suggestion that when the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approving the variations by a unanimous vote, an Ordinance be presented for first reading at the same meeting. This could reduce the time involved for the Petitioner from 2 to 5 weeks. These items will be discussed at a future Committee of the Whole meeting. ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT mayor.Farley declared,the meeting adjourned at 10:53 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 12 - December 17, 1991 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION December 30, 1991 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 12/13/91 through Per Attached Journal Balance 12113/91 12130/91 List of Bills Entry 12130/91 General & Special Revenue Funds General Fund $ 1,839,760 $ 787,614 $ 565,687 <5,000> $ 2,056,687 Motor Fuel Tax 438,803 - 12,378 426,425 Community Development Block Grant Fund 568 7,000 4,627 2,941 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 406 17,161 21,812 5,000 755 Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 3,430,894 144,012 276,300 3,298,606 Parking System Revenue 166,366 7,403 4,624 169,145 Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund 1,117,747 185,698 138,390 1,165,055 Vehicle Replacement Fund 440,946 50,888 42,709 449,125 Capital Pro'e� cts Capital Improvement Fund 359,927 46,047 10,471 395,503 Downtown Redev Const Funds 326,673 - 268 326,405 Police & Fire Building Construction 4,652,997 51,041 32,698 4,671,340 Flood Control Construction Fund 2,345,272 50,058 190,348 2,204,982 Debt Service Funds 1,440,116 80,051 776,970 743,197 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund 6,301 3,581 - 9,882 Escrow Deposit Fund 1,474,598 15,067 25,879 1,463,786 Police Pension Fund 16,659,370 71,102 40,849 16,689,623 Firemen's Pension Fund 18,661,113 83,035 46,291 18,697,857 Benefit Trust Funds 246,992 246 992 $55,018_,306 51,599.758 X2,190,301 _ 553,018,306 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS ABC PLUMBING AMERICAN NATIONAL LANDSCAPING AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER BANG & OLUFSEN OF AMERICA ROBERT J, BARRERA BEN'S PLUMBING DAVID BUBLITZ CARDINAL BUILDERS V.J. CENTRACCHIO & SON INC. CLARK ROOFING CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT DANLEY LUMBER ROBERT L. DENNISON KEITH DESIREE DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT EZELL BUILDING CONSTR.CO.,INC. JULIA FARNHAM FELDCO PATIO ROOM, INC. FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS. KIRBY GIAMPA HARVEY KRECKERJBURMEISTER VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL C10235 ABC PLBG $100.00 $100.00 C10160 AMERICAN NATIONAL $100.00 $100.00 C9259 AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER $75.00 $75.00 911219 BANG & OLUFSEN $40.00 $40.00 VEHICLE STICKER REFUND $16.00 $16.00 C10055 BENS PLBG & SEWER $100.00 $100.00 REFUND DEC HLTH INS CONTR $33.00 REFUND NOV HLTH INS CONT C9941 CARDINAL BLDRS $9.57 $100.06 $42.5' $100.01 C10078 CENTRACCHIO REFUND $100.00 $100.00 C9907 CLARK ROOFING $35.00 $35.00 PAYMENT PjR 12f24j91 $224.25 $224.25* $100.00 C9993 DA LEY LLUMBBER $100.00 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $14.28 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $1.44 $15.72 REFUND DEC HLTH INS CONTR $31.45 $31.45* P/R ENDING 12/26/91 $728.58 PZR ENDING 12Z26Z91 $35,906.74 PZR ENDING 12J26Z91 $411,941.00 P�R ENDING 12/26791 $1,218.86 $449,795.18* C 0099 EZELL BLDRS $475.00 $475.00 REFUND DEC HLTH INS CONTR $10.81 $10.81* C10106 FELDCO PRODUCTS $100.00 $100.00 DUE TO FED DEP P/R 12/12 $1,232.68 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 12f12 $78.22 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 12212 $11,327.52 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 12212 $2,652.55 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 1212 $55.34 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 1224 $80.67 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 12224 $55.31 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 1224 $2,437.29 DUE TO FED DEP PZR 1224 $1,318.52 DUE TO FED DEP P�R 12/24 $10,484.96 $29,723.06* OVERPMT 4%4%90 F NAL BILL $6.84 OVERPMT 444490 FINAL BILL $.66 $7.50 C10242 HARV Y/BURMEISTER $100.00 $100.00 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS HOBBS GROUP, INC. IMPERIAL DEVELOPMENT IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE J.G. DISTRIBUTING INC. JOHN JENSEN JEWEL FOOD STORES ANDREA JUSZCZYK EDWARD LABUZ CLIFFORD LAIER DAVID R. LEWIS JOE LIBERIO LOCAL VENDING SERVICE INC. M -W CONSTRUCTION ROMAN MALYSZKO KATHRYN MOATS NATURE OF THINGS NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. NORMAN MECHANICAL PATRICK O'DONNELL PALDO SIGN & DISPLAY CO. PENSION DISBURSEMENTS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT POSTMASTER RAUSCH ALAN CONSTRUCTION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PREMIUM $15,688.00 WORKERS COMP PREMIUM $26,333.00 PROF LIAB PREMIUM $11,340.00 $3,705.00 $57,066.40 PROF LIAB PREMIUM C8627 IMPERIAL DEVELOPMENT $4,353.18 C8627 IMPERIAL DEVELOPMENT 911025 IMPERIAL DEVELOPMENT $2,000.00 $4,353.18 $10,706. JANUARY 92 LIFE INS $234.00 $40.00 $234..-_, $40.00 911230 JG DISTRIBUTING $100.00 $100.40 C10075 JENSEN REFUND STICKER RETURN REFUND $96.00 $96.00 PMT P R 12/24 $254.00 $254.00* C10184 LABUZ REFUND $100.00 $100.00 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $1.44 $14.28 $15.72 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $.22 REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT $2.28 REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT $.25 $2.75 REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT $•48 REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT $4.00 $5.24 911230 LOCAL VENDING $4 $100.00 $100.00 C8391 M -W CONST C9873 MALYSZKO REFUND $75.00 $75.00 C10006 MOATS REFUND $100.00 $500.00 $100.00 $500.00 08782 NATURE OF THINGS BONDS POR 12/24/91 $500.00 $500.00* C10001 ORMAN MECHANICAL $100.60 $100. REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL $.24 $2.62 REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL $100.00 1415 PALDO SIGN CO 1416 PALDO SIGN CO $100.00 $200.04 DEC POLICE PENSION DISB DEC FIRE PENSION DISB $40,849.07 $46,290.85 $87,139.92* MISC EXPENSES $35.00 $35.00* CHRISTMAS STAMPS $290.00 $290.00- $500.00 C10076 RAUSCH ALAN CONST $500.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12130191 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS THE SAHARA COMPANY C10175 SAHARA CO REFUND $100.00 $75.00 $175.00. C9989 SAHARA CO REFUND STATE OF ILLINOIS LIQUOR APP RECORD CK $35.00 $35.00 $70.00* LIQUOR C9592 APP RECORD CK STIMSONITE REFUND $445.00 $445.00 STIMSONITE DENNIS TAKI REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT $26.18 $2.64 $28.82 REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT 911213 911217 BOND MONEY BOND MONEY $2,950.00 $1,350.00 911219 BOND MONEY $1,770.00 911226 BOND MONEY $1,000.00 911227 BOND MONEY $550.00 911230 BOND MONEY $850.00 $8,470.00* MARIO TRISTAN REFUND DEC HLTH INS CONT $22.65 $75.00 $22.65* $75.00 TWIN LINKS REFUND C7196 UNIQUE BLDRS $100.00 $100.00 UNIQUE BUILDERS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT EZELL $100.00 C6677g SCARSDALEBLDRS $100.00 C8307 C9259 CAGLE SEWER AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER $25.00 C9592 STIMSONITE $55.00 C9873 MALYSZKO $25.00 C9907 CLARK ROOFING $15.00 C9989 HALLEY SAHARA $25.00 P1390 WHITE WAY $25.00 P1391 WHITE WAY $25.00 911031 VIDEO WONDERS $550.00 $970.00 WALGREEN CO. C9824 WALGREEN CO $100.00 $100.00 $100. WEIDNER SEWER SERVICE C10217 C10232 WEIDNER SEWER WEIDNER SEWER $100.00 $200.00 WHITE WAY SIGN CO. P1390 P1391 WHITE WAY SIGN WHITE WAY SIGN $75.00 $75.00 $150.00 ***TOTAL** $650,300.62 CLEARING ACCOUNTS PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION GENERAL FUND ARRANGEMENT SWEET ROLLS HOLIDAY ADS HOLIDAY ADS MEMBERSHIP DUES 91 LIQUOR LICENSE SURVEY $1,830.65 $38.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4 $5.40 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $37.00 $74.00 PAYMENT DATE 12/3091 $5.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $415,004.20 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,377.75 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $21,812.48 WATER & SEWER FUND FUND $41,074.95 $57,173.48 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $839.23 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $46,290.85 POLICE PENSION FUND $40,849.07 FIREMEN'S PENSION $104.70 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $25,878.61 SERVICES $79.50 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION GENERAL FUND ARRANGEMENT SWEET ROLLS HOLIDAY ADS HOLIDAY ADS MEMBERSHIP DUES 91 LIQUOR LICENSE SURVEY $1,830.65 $38.50 $38.50 $5.40 $5.40 $37.00 LEGAL LEGAL $37.00 $74.00 $1,707.75 LEGAL $5.00 $1,712.75* ***TOTAL** $1,830.65 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ARNSTEIN & LEHR NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $21.00 $52.50 NOVEMBER NOVEMBER LEGAL LEGAL SERVICES SERVICES $42.00 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $603.75 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $1,715.85 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $157.50 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $602.55 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $131.25 NOVEMBMER LEGAL SERVICES $104.70 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $79.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30%91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $63.00 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $757.90 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $3,758.12 $8,089.62 JENNIFER CALI SUBPOENA FEE COMPUTER TRAINING CLASSES $30.00 $480.00 $30.00* $480.00 COMPUTERLAND GREGORY FRANKS SUBPOENA FEE $30.00 $30.00* ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC REGISTER DIXON $90.00 $257.00 $90.00_ $257. Qq' MOUNT PROSPECT.VACATIONS INC. BANQUETS AIR FARE DIXON EMPLOYEE PARTY $400.00 $400.0` MR. PETER'S SHANE MURRAY SUBPOENA FEE $30.00 $30.00* NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE WAGE & BENEFIT SURVEY $900.00 $900.00 PEDERSEN & HOUPT NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $279.82 $42.50 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $21.25 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $106.25 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $130.00 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $27.50 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $85.00 NOVEMBER LEGAL SERVICES $454.29 $1,146.61 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $88.57 $7.00 MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $1.00 MISC EXPENSES $53.68 $150.25* PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. S.C. MTG SUPPLIES TRNG SERVICES RENDERED $25.62 $465.66 $25.62* $465.66 VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $12,094.76 GENERAL FUND $12,094.76 ******************************************************************************************************** COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION BANKCARD ASSOCIATES OFFICE SUPPLIES $108.57 $108.57 ******************************************************************************************************** FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUTLER PAPER COMPANY COFFEE BREAK,•INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $197.40 $40.45 PAGE 6 COMPUTERLAND ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $1,809.00 $1,809. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP ILLINOIS PUBLIC PENSIONS PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 $15.50 $35.00 $15.Do $35.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL COMMUNICATIONS SUPPORT CORP. SERVICES RENDERED $600.00 $600.00 CORKY'S CATERING, INC. VOLUNTEER PARTY FOOD $133.10 $133.10. CORTEZ DIXON COMM ASST BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 ILLINOIS NATOA DUES-PASALIC $40.00 $40.00 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM SERVICE CALL $12.94 $12.94 IMPRINT PRODUCTS ADDRESS LABELS $7.28 $7.7 - JONES, WARE & GRENARD SERVICES RENDERED $220.00 $220. CAROLYN A. MILLER COMM ASST COW MTG $25.00 $25.1ju PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $16.96 $16.96* APRIL RAJCZYK COMM ASST BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 JERRY RAJCZYK COMM ASST BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 RESPOND SYSTEMS FIRST AID KIT SUPPLIES $4.20 $4.20 JONNA SHOUB COMM ASST BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,268.05 GENERAL FUND $1,268.05 ******************************************************************************************************** FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUTLER PAPER COMPANY COFFEE BREAK,•INC. PAPER COFFEE & SUPPLIES $197.40 $40.45 $197.40 $40.A4 COMPUTERLAND PRINTER & MEMORY UPGRADE $1,809.00 $1,809. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP ILLINOIS PUBLIC PENSIONS DELIVERY SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $15.50 $35.00 $15.Do $35.00 LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LOTUS 2.3 UPGRADE $119.00 $79.00 $119.00 $79.00 MIDRANGE COMPUTING SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $.45 MISC EXPENSES $6.85 MISC EXPENSES $4.22 MISC EXPENSES $16.33 $27.85* POSTMASTER BUSINESS REPLY $75.00 $75.00* VENDOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT RCM DATA CORP SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS TRACS WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC XL/DATACOMP INC. FINANCE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT 25K DRUM CARTRIDGE $276.48 1991 DATA BOOK $26.00 MODEM $500.00 LABELS $87.17 DECEMBER MICE SERVICE $13.04 ***TOTAL** $3,300.89 PAGE 7 GyloV.1t $276.48 $26.00* $500.00* $87.17 $13.04 $3,300.89 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE CHICAGO TRIBUNE SUBSCRIPTION $32.38 $32.38 DARTNELL CORPORATION, B/R -200 EMPLOYEE BULLETINS $94.12 $94.12 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC TRUTH IN TAXATION $237.60 $63 30 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND LEGAL PAGE LEGAL PAGE LEGAL PAGE LEGAL PAGE LEGAL PAGE $743.88 $65.93 $87.03 $84.40 $79.12 _ $617.38 ***TOTAL** $743.88 ******************************************************************************************************** RISK MANAGEMENT BROOKFIELD JANUARY ADMIN FEES $4,138.80 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1230%91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT MED CLAIMS THRU 12/17 $39,127.61 $43,266.41* CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE ANNUAL PREMIUM PAVLOCK $2,398.03 $868.05 $2,398.03 $868.05 MARY G. DEHUSZAR FULL & FINAL PMT ACCIDENT JANUARY HEALTH INSURANCE $7,390.95 $7,390.95 HMO ILLINOIS HOBBS GROUP, INC. RETURN PREMIUM $900.00 - $7,843.52 PREMIUM RETURN PREMIUM $863.12- WORKERS COMP PREMIUM $13,167.00 PROF LIAR PREMIUM PROF LIAB PREMIUM $5,670.00 $1,852.00 $26,769.40 HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL SERVICES WILSON SERVICES 9001808939—X $187.90 $198.65 $187.90 $198.65 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES, S.C. 900033336 D MAY $71.00 $65.93 $71.00 $65.93* POSTMASTER HEALTH MAGAZINE POSTAGE ***TOTAL** $61,216.32 RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $81,216.32 ******************************************************************************************************** INSPECTION SERVICES BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC. CODE ENF CORRESPOND COURSE $125.00 $158.00 $283. CENTRAL STATES ASSOC. OF FOOD REFERENCE MATERIAL MEMBERSHIP FEE ROELS $10.00 $199.96 $10.-'a $199.96 COMP USA CONSTRUCTION SPEC. INSTITUTE COMPUTER SUPPLIES INSPECTION SUPPLIES $23.50 $50.00 $23.50 $50.00 HAESTAD METHODS . ILLINOIS ENVIR. HEALTH ASSOC. CADMAGIC PROGRAM MEMBERSHIP DUES $20.00 $20.00 $34.50* MASONRY ADVISORY COUNCIL REFERENCE MATERIAL $34.50 $16.33 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $27.00 MISC EXPENSES $3.26 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES MISC EXPENSES $40.78 MISC EXPENSES $9.35 $96.72* PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $190.00 $21.06 $190.00 $21.06 QUALEX, INC. SUBURBAN BUILDING OFFICIALS CO FILM PROCESSING CONFERENCE DUES $30.00 $30.00 CHRISTINE VANDORNICK CLOTHING ALLOWANCE OFFICE SUPPLIES $25.00 $124.55 $25.00 $124.55 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS XL/DATACOMP INC. DECEMBER MICE SERVICE $13.04 $13.F INSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL** $1,121.31 GENERAL FUND $1,121.33 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY PATROL TAGS & KEY RINGS $37.88 $37.88 BOB'S RELOADING INC.. AMMUNITION AMMUNITION $364.50 $310.00 $674.50 CEPA PRODUCTS, INC. CLEMENT COMMUNICATIONS, INC. RUBBER GLOVES POSTER DISPLAY FRAME $44.99 $29.95 $44.99 $29.95 COMPUSERVE, INC COMPUTER SERVICE INFO $10.00 $68.00 $10.00 $68.00 COMPUTERLAND TONER CARTRIDGE SUPPLIES $59.46 CONRAD AND SON SUPPLIES $17.95 $77.!" CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED ENVELOPES $145.58 $38.05 $183,5 FINISHMASTER, INC. ENVELOPES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $26.10 $28.48 $54.58 FREDRIKSEN & SONS SERVICE EXTINGUISHERS $92.70 $92.70 FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES NOV 91 CAR WASHES $452.00 $191.97 $452.00 $191.97 GALL'S, INC. GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES TRAFFIC CONES TIRES $159.92 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT H R HART PHOTO HANSEN ASSOCIATES ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF CHIEFS KALE UNIFORMS, INC. ANTHONY KOTLARZ LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. LIGHTNING POWDER CO., INC. LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG LITTLE AMERICA LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION TIRES FILM PROCESSING MTCE & COPIES MTCE & COPIES MTCE & COPIES SERVICE 1992 MEMBERSHIP DUES PUBLICATION UNIFORM SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES UNIFORM SUPPLIES EXPENSES PARTS PARTS CREDIT PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS SUPPLIES CREDIT SUPPLIES PHOTO SUPPLIES PRISONER FOOD PRISONER FOOD PRISONER FOOD OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES INVOICE AMOUNT $1,033.00 $177.21 $102.82 $252.87 $144.54 $101.71 $300.00 $350.00 $143.70 $163.30 $9.95 $926.96 $206.42 $168.12 $52.99- $200.12 $77.33 $6.38 $72.77 $228.75 $237.10 $114.95- $234.65 $5.20 5.20 $5.20 $41.20 $149.95 $31.40 $30.67 $19.48 $12.60 $194.25 $59.42 $59.45 $59.42 PAGE 10 ifelva $1,192.92 $177.21 $500.23 $101.'" $650.Ou $316.95 $926.96 $906.90 $237.10 $119.70 $15.-- VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC. MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP. NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. NORTH SUB. ASSOC. OF CHIEFS OF NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE PERSIN & ROBBIN JEWELERS PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. ERIC E. PIEE PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. RPM AUTOMOTIVE INC. SAVE -A -PET SOMAR ENTERPRISES STANARD & ASSOCIATES, INC GEORGE STEINER TRW CREDIT DATA DIVISION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12130191 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL OFFICE SUPPLIES $59.42 SUPPLIES $48.00 $765.26 TACTICAL UNIT CAR RENTAL $100.00 $100.00 MICE SUPPLIES $55.43 $55.43 WITHHOLDING TAX $2,567.07. $2,567.07* DUES-PAVLOCK/DALEY $50.00 $50.00 PHYSICAL - GARCIA $195.00 $195.00 COMPLIANCE TICKETS $270.00 $270.0" JEWELRY APPRAISAL $200.00 $200.':, MISC EXPENSES $18.00 MISC EXPENSES $16.00 MISC EXPENSES $32.24 MISC EXPENSE'S $100.00 MISC EXPENSES $1.06 MISC EXPENSES $11.80 MISC EXPENSES $23.20 MISC EXPENSES $117.90 MISC EXPENSES $5.90 MISC EXPENSES $3.75 MISC EXPENSES $11.50 MISC EXPENSES $4.26 MISC EXPENSES $17.00 $362.61* RADIO REPAIRS $205.00 $205.00 NOVEMBER 91 STRAYS $378.00 $378.00 PARTS $44.20 PARTS $9.00 PARTS $26.64 PARTS $127.72 $207.°` MEMO PADS $273.00 CREDIT BB2042 & BB2110$17.05- $255. PARTS $18.20 $18.20 NOVEMBER 91 STRAYS $245.00 $245.00 AMMUNITION $458.65 $458.65 POST TESTS & GUIDES $7,973.50 $7,973.50 EXPENSES $54.96 $54.96 EMPLOYMENT RECORD CHECKS $16.80 $16.80 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY DON ANDERSON BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC. BUTLER PAPER COMPANY CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO CREST COMPUTER SUPPLY DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C E.S. MACHINE CO., INC. FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDICINE FD. FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES H R HART PHOTO HANSEN ASSOCIATES TONY HUEMANN IGE, INCORPORATED ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $17.65 PAGE 12 $79..57 $29.95 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT INCIDENT COMMAND BOARD FIRE EXTINGUISHER. GAS $17.45 $17.45 PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 $80.20 $40.10 $120.30 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT $105.09 SUPPLIES COPY MACHINE SERVICE $113.82 VILLAGE OF SCHAUMBURG 1992 VALIDATION STICKERS $66.87 $314.00 $66.87 $314.00 VINCENT VIVERITO TRAINING EXPENSES DECEMBER MTCE SERVICE $65.20 $65.20 XL/DATACOMP INC. $36.27 MTCE & COPIES MTCE & COPIES $102.82 $144.53 $247.35 EXPENSES ***TOTAL** $21,887.95 POLICE DEPARTMENT $19.00 $19.00 SERVICE GENERAL FUND $21,887.95 SERVICE $75.08 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY DON ANDERSON BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC. BUTLER PAPER COMPANY CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO CREST COMPUTER SUPPLY DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C E.S. MACHINE CO., INC. FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDICINE FD. FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES H R HART PHOTO HANSEN ASSOCIATES TONY HUEMANN IGE, INCORPORATED ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 6.11 $11.54 $11.54 $17.65 PARTS LOCK HRDWARE FIELD TRAILER $79..57 $29.95 $79.57 $29.95 INCIDENT COMMAND BOARD FIRE EXTINGUISHER. GAS $17.45 $17.45 PAPER $80.20 $40.10 $120.30 PAPER MONTHLY SERVICE $164.49 $164.49 SUPPLIES $93.76 $11.33 $105.09 SUPPLIES COPY MACHINE SERVICE $113.82 $113.82 TUBING-HAZMAT DECON $303.60 $650.00 $303JA $650. REGISTER CAVELLO%THILL NOV 91 CAR WASHES $20,00 $20.Ov SUPPLIES $36.27 $36.27 MTCE & COPIES MTCE & COPIES $102.82 $144.53 $247.35 EXPENSES $150.00 $150.00 CYLINDER OXYGEN/ACETYLENE $19.00 $19.00 SERVICE $192.14 SERVICE $75.08 SERVICE $22.28 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS' ASSOC ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS FOUNDATIO ILLINOIS PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGH INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF ARSON INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL MGMT. CHARLES LIVINGSTON LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. NICK'S LA CONTINA RESTAURANT NORTHEAST ILL. EMERGENCY MGMT. NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSI NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY NORTHWEST OF US PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. SUSAN L. PEYTON R & R UNIFORMS INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SERVICE $26.13 $315.63 REGISTER HAJEK $200.00 1992 MEMBERSHIP DUES DUES-CAVELLO/ULREICH $35.00 $105.00 $340.00 REGISTRATIONS $175.00 $175.00 1992 CLOTH CALENDARS 1992 ANNUAL DUES $13.25 $30.00 $43.25 MEMBERSHIP JACKSON $40.00 $40." CREDIT SUPPLIES TESTING SUPPLIES $36.00 $269.50 $305.50 BATTERY CHECKER $21.97 $21.97 CREDIT SUPPLIES $41.58 - $82.02 OFFICE SUPPLIES $56.46 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES $31.95 OFFICE SUPPLIES $28.16 OFFICE SUPPLIES $141.71 $5.49 $304.21 OFFICE SUPPLIES $78.00 PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $55.91 $133.91 WITHHOLDING TAX $1,673.30 $1,673.30* EMERGENCY SVCS XMAS PARTY $321.75 $60.00 $321.75 $60.00 CONFERENCE -WHITE HLTH EXAMS & BACK XRAYS $3,620.00 $3,620.00 3 VISITS NOVEMBER 91 $294.00 $11.80 $294.00 $11.80 POWER CORDS MEMBERSHIP FLORY $40.00 $40.00 MTG SUPPLIES TRNG $5.04 MTG SUPPLIES TRNG $2.57 MTG SUPPLIES TRNG $26.97 MTG SUPPLIES TRNG $8.99 MTG SUPPLIES TRNG $9.95 MTG SUPPLIES TRNG MTG SUPPLIES TRNG $4.97 $103.69 $162.18* CONT ED-STENOSCRIPT $64.00 $64.00 7 TEST SHIRTS $124.00 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. DOROTHY L. RECKLING SOUTHERN FOODSERVICE MANAGEMNT SPARTAN MOTORS INC. STATE OF ILLINOIS SUBURBAN GAS SALES TAU JOURNAL VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC. TOM WHITE FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL BADGES $143.60 BADGES $29.75 BADGES $107.70 $405.05 TRAINING $675.00 $675.00 TRAINING DUMOVICH $162.48 $162.48 PARTS $142.02 $142.C" FINGERPRINT PROCESSING FEE $30.00 $30.1 OXYGEN $80.52 $80.52 SUBSCRIPTION $30.00 $30.00 SUPPLIES $381.40 SUPPLIES $122.50 $503.90 REIMS TOOLBOX & HARDWARE $18.47 $18.47 $12,048.48 ***TOTAL** $12,048.48 ******************************************************************************************************** CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE GENERAL FUND JANUARY SERVICES RENDERED $27,410.00 $27,410.00 $27,410.00 ***TOTAL** $27,410.x^ ******************************************************************************************************** HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE,INC. PUBLICATIONS $240.07 $240.07 VENDOR HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC. CHICAGO HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORP ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. NANCY MORGAN NOVAK & PARKER INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. THE SALVATION ARMY SHELTER, INC. SPRINGHOUSE BOOK CO. HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION GENERAL FUND PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT IBBOTSON HEATING CO. MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. QUALEX, INC. SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C TRKLA, PETTIGREW, ALLEN&PAYNE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SENIOR TAXI RIDES $482.05 $482.05 CREDIT LATEX GLOVES $4.43 - $8.86 $4.43 LATEX GLOVES SERVICE $35.64 $35.64 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT $96.80 $49.99 $146.79 TELEVISION REPAIR $59.95 $59.95 MISC EXPENSES $12.00 $12.¢ BUDGET ALLOCATION $1,875.00 $1,875.{;_ BUDGET ALLOCATION $2,250.00 $2,250.00 PUBLICATION $19.50 $19.50 $5,125.43 CDBG 413 E LINCOLN CONSUMER EXPO BOOTH MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES FILM HEALTH CARE SERVICE TIF CONSULTING SERVICES ***TOTAL** $5,125.43 $1,900.00 $1,900.00 $375.00 $375.00 $12.02 $4.00 $7.34 $5.00 $28.( $44.10 $44.x- $1,333.33 $1,333.33 $1,500.00 $1,500.00 ***TOTAL** $5,180.79 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12%30/91 PAGE 16 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $1,931.12 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $3,249.67 STREET DIVISION ABM, INC. ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. AETNA TRUCK PARTS AKZO SALT INC. ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY AMCO INDUSTRIES INC. AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD BEHM PAVEMENT MAINTENANCE, INC BIRC BLS ENTERPRISES, INC. THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO. BUSSE HARDWARE SUPPLIES $287.00 $287.0 1 YR MICE FIRE ALARMS 1 YR MICE FIRE ALARMS $450.00 $450.00 $900.00 SUPPLIES $14.98 SUPPLIES $33.58 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 27.44 $83.70 $159.70 PARTS $12.31 PARTS $30.46 PARTS .$9.50 $52.27 ROAD SALT $4,143.76 ROAD SALT $2,590.67 ROAD SALT $2,057.97 ROAD SALT 2,043.26 ROAD SALT $1,542.01 $12,377.67 COLD PATCH $360.40 $360.40 FITTINGS $529.05 $529.05 RODS $164.55 $164.55 SUPPLIES $14.12 SUPPLIES $50.40 SUPPLIES $25.20 $89. PARTS $369.75 PARTS $99.13 $468.88 CRACK SEALING PROGRAM $26,895.00 $26,895.00 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL $75.00 $75.00 REPAIR HYDRAULIC CYLINDER $488.00 $488.00 PARTS 29.04 PARTS $41.74 $70.78 REPAIRS $181.00 $181.00 STATION 13 SUPPLIES $41.40 VENDOR STREET DIVISION CHICAGO CASTER AND EQUIPMENT C CLARKE IND. ARTHUR CLESEN, INC. COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS CONRAD AND SON R. L. CORTY & COMPANY COURTESY HOME CENTER EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC. FINISHMASTER, INC. FIRE AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC FORBES INCORPORATED FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO TODD GRIMM HELLER LUMBER CO. EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO. JOHN HUFFMAN ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBOR GERALD JANES LAND AND LAKES CO LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12%30%91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES PLASTIC SLIDES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES JANITORIAL SERVICE 12%01-15 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES TIRE SERVICE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FIRE ALARM SERVICES ELECTRICAL WORK ELECTRICAL WORK NOV 91 CAR WASHES UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICES SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES REIMB SAFETY SHOES PARTS -SALT SPREADER PARTS VIDEOS & TREE ORD MANUAL SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION REFUSE DISPOSAL PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS INVOICE AMOUNT $38.19 $154.94 $224.00 $19.75 $1,796.00 $59.45 $17.94 $82.00 $45.05 $40.35 $29.08 $9.92 $15.00 $39.20 $23.39 $23.90 $69.75 $447.00 $447.00 $28.00 $153.12 $153.12 $20.00 $33.04 $27.29 $50.00 $472.16 $1,423.26 $144.00 $20.00 $396.00 $11.58 $10.65 $27.42 $6.20 $26.00 PAGE 17 TOTAL $79.59 $154.94 $224.00 $19.75 $1,796.00 $77.39 $82.q' $124.40 $15.00 $86.49 $69.75 $894.00 $28.00 $306.24 $20.00 $33.04 $27.29 $50.00 $1,895.{ $14 4. b,. $20.00 $396.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION PARTS $26.00 PARTS $13.00 PARTS $26.00 $146.85 LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO. WING NUT THROWER LINER $6.00 $109.08 $115.08 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES $131.28 $131.28 LINDE GASES OF THE MIDWEST T STARGON SHIELDING GAS $132.30 $132.' ARTHUR LINKE SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $20.4- MCMASTER-CARR REVOLVING SIPHON VENTS $370.88 $370.88 MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP. MTCE SUPPLIES $103.60 $103.60 WILLIAM MORRISEY SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $20.00 MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST PARTS $65.00 $55.00 $120.00 NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY.SEV PARTS QTRLY ALARM SVC CHG $25.00 $25.00 NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR REPLACE AIR CONTROL $451.65 2 POWER HEADS $90.80 $542.45 WALTER NORRIS COMPANY DELTROL VALVE $74.91 $74.91 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 1601 W GOLF RD $908.80 14 E BUSSE AVE $805.18 11 S PINE ST $1,662.10 100 S EMERSON $1,386.54 $4,762.62 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES $51.20 SUPPLIES $41.30 SUPPLIES $52.50 SUPPLIES $229.02 SUPPLIES $279.60 SUPPLIES $172.87 SUPPLIES $93.96 SUPPLIES $88.98 $1,009.43 DAN PETERSON SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $20.00 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $42.20 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $8.40 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $5.80 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $23.86 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $29.00 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $91.29 $200.55* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12%30%91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY DRIVERS SEAT $289.00 $69.84 $358.84 QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL U JOINT PARTS $89.32 $16.75 PARTS PARTS $39.52 $145.59 JOHN RAMAKER SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $20.00 $20.00 $20.0n LARRY RHEIN RPM AUTOMOTIVE INC. PARTS MATERIALS 003229CH182907 $429.52 $248.18 $429` $248.�� RTP - SUBURBAN SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY SUPPLIES $315.10 $42.46 $315.10 $42.46 MICHAEL SCHWEIGER REIMB SAFETY SHOES $40.00 SHEPP PEST CONTROL DEC PEST CONTROL DEC PEST CONTROL $40.00 DEC PEST CONTROL $40.00 DEC PEST CONTROL $40.00 DEC PEST CONTROL $40.00 DEC PEST CONTROL $40:00 $240.00 MARK SIWIETZ SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $40.00 $20.00 $40.00 SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL ARBORISTS PIPE & SUPPLY INC. ANNUAL DUES BLACK PIPE $70.38 $70.38 STANDARD STANTON POWER RODDING CATCHfBASIN/INLET CLEANING $2,647.00 $170.00 $2,647.00 $170.00 STAR DISPLAYS STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY SUPPLIIES SUPPLIES $23.85 $20.00 $23.85 $20.00 GEORGE STOUT TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION OXYGEN CYLINDER $12.60 $12.60 MARTIN TUREK SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $18.00 $20.00 $18.0 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS JAMES VAN ALLEN NEWSLETTER SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $20.' PAUL VAN ALLEN SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $3,440.00 $20.L $3,440.00 ARTHUR WEILER INC. WILLIAMSON NURSERY & ASSOC., I TREES TREE TRANSPLANT $300.00 $300.00 WILLIAM WOJCIK SNOW REMOVAL ORIENTATION $20.00 $ 275.00 $20.00 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO WINDOW CLEANING WINDOW CLEANING $180.00 WINDOW CLEANING $180.00 WINDOW CLEANING $180.00 $815.00 VENDOR STREET DIVISION GENERAL FUND WATER AND SEWER DIVISION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12130%91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION $54,E36.12 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND PAGE 20 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL ***TOTAL** $66,913.79 $12,377.67 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $77.54 SUPPLIES $52.11 SUPPLIES $29.20 SUPPLIES $52.61 SUPPLIES $11.47 SUPPLIES $22.84 $245.77 ADOBE SYSTEMS INCORPORATED SOFTWARE UPGRADE $66.50 $66.50 AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS PARTS $21.45 $9.50 $30.95 AMCO INDUSTRIES INC. FITTINGS $529.04 $529.04 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK 1987B PRINCIPAL DUE 1/1/92 $75,000.00 1987B INTEREST DUE 1/1/92 $46,887.50 $121,887.50* ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY SUPPLIES $23.40 $23.40 ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD PARTS $23.20 PARTS $57.86 PARTS $127.54 PARTS $12.40 PARTS $9.29 PARTS $108.64 PARTS $34.54 PARTS $26.17 - PARTS $34.54 PARTS $13.66 - PARTS $99.13 $467.31 AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES 9191 MAINTENANCE $550.00 $550.00 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION B & H INDUSTRIES BARI CONTRACTORS DAVID BOESCHE THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO SANDRA CLARK COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMP USA CONRAD AND SON E & H UTILITY SALES EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP FINISHMASTER, INC. JOSEPH D. FOREMAN & CO. FREDRIKSEN & SONS FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO JOE GATTAS GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES JAMES E. GUENTHER VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12%30191 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL DIAZO PRINTS $25.79 DIAZO PRINTS $7.59 COLOR COPIES $7.50 COLOR COPIES $5.00 $45.88 WOLF RD WATERMN INSTALL $86,931.00- $86,931.00 REIMBURSEMENT CDL $40.00 $40.00 PARTS $130.00 PARTS $29.04 $159. ARRANGEMENT $58.50 ARRANGEMENT $65.00 $123.50 SERVICE $84.87 $84.87 REIMBURSEMENT CDL$40.00 $40.00 BJ80-JT-23598 $3,989.17 $3,989.17 BH67-JT-1310-A $69.99 $69.99 COMPUTER SUPPLIES $247.38 COMPUTER SUPPLIES $139.95 $387.33 SUPPLIES $59.45 SUPPLIES $282.07 SUPPLIES $17.94 $359.46 PARTS $785.24 PARTS $230.04 $1,015.28 TIRE SERVICE $74.44 $74.44 PRIORITY PACKAGE $47.50 $47.50 SUPPLIES $39.20 SUPPLIES $21.22 $60.42 VALVE STEM $192.16 $192.16 EXTINGUISHER SERVICE $20.00 EXTINGUISHER SERVICE $20.00 $40. NOV 91 CAR WASHES $8.00 $8-= UNIFORM SERVICES $153.12 UNIFORM SERVICES $153.12 $306.24 REIMBURSEMENT CDL $40.00 $40.00 TIRES $354.32 SERVICE $38.00 SERVICE $39.00 $431.32 REIMBURSEMENT CDL $40.00 $40.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE WATER METER LABOR WATER METER LABOR $71.37 $309.27 $380.64 I.B.M. CORPORATION MTCE AGREEMENT $115.37 $30.63 $115.37 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $203.83 SERVICE SERVICE $533.12 SERVICE $37.04 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $61.25 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $97.32 SERVICE $18.36 SERVICE $17.20 SERVICE $23.49 SERVICE $18.76 SERVICE $28.72 SERVICE $19.10 $1,180.71 JULIE, INC. NOV 91 CHARGES NOV 91 CHARGES $129.98 $20.43 $150.41 LAND AND LAKES CO REFUSE DISPOSAL $792.00 $792.00 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. PARTS11.75 $1 $3.68 ARTS PARTS $185.27 PARTS 76.35 PARTS $148.87 PARTS $13.00 PARTS $78.00 PARTS $26.00 PARTS $91.00 PARTS $39.00 PARTS $26.00 $798.92 JERRY MCINTOSH REIMBURSEMENT CDL $40.00 $146.00 $40.00 $14.00 MEYER MATERIAL CO. MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP. TORPEDO SAND MTCE SUPPLIES $103.60 $10 .60 MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST PARTS $60.00 $60.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 1213091 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION JOHN MURPHY REIMBURSEMENT CDL $40.00 $40.00 MURRAY AND TRETTEL INC. RAINGAUGE PENS $59.00 $59.00 MYERS TIRE SUPPLY MICE SUPPLIES $92.32 $92.32 NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L SAFETY FILM $67.00 $67.00 NET MIDWEST, INC. NOV 91 WATER SAMPLES $105.00 $105.00 WALTER NORRIS COMPANY DELTROL VALVE $74.91 $74.91 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY CREDIT SUPPLIES $37.25 - SUPPLIES $62.19 SUPPLIES $37.25 SUPPLIES $59.48 $121.67 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $49.65 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $21.29 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $21.45 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $44.35 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $3.82 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $25.76 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $12.87 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $28.06 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $9.95 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $37.31 $254.51* PLAZA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. SIDEWALK & DRIVEWAY $1,867.25 $1,867.25 PORTABLE TOOL SALES REPAIR CLAY DIGGER $35.00 $35.00 POSTMASTER BUSINESS REPLY $185.00 POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS $519.03 $704.03* PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES $112.90 $12.54 $125.44 QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL PARTS $4.95 $31.50 PARTS PARTS $9.10 PARTS $20.70 PARTS $5.55 PARTS $7.40 PARTS $64.43 PARTS $27.44 $171.07 RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. FILM PROCESSING $22.44 FILM PROCESSING $11.22 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12130191 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION FILM & PROCESSING $26.00 FILM & PROCESSING $15.77 $20.21 - $95.64 RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES FILM & PROCESSING ENGINEERING SERVICES $8,552.02 84. $$8.31 $8,552.02 $84.94 RPM AUTOMOTIVE INC. SAFETY SUPPLY ILLINOIS PARTS FACESHIELD $12.00 $8.9. $I2. WALLY SCHULTZ REIMBURSEMENT CDL SR -70-62369-1-1 $266.59 $266.5,7 SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY CREDIT SUPPLIES $40.08- $90.07 $49.99 V & G PRINTERS INC. SUPPLIES OFFICE WORK ORDERS $290.00 $94'90 $290.00 $94'90 ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS REPAIR SLEEVE ***TOTAL** $235,225.31 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER & SEWER FUND $235,225.31 ******************************************************************************************************** PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A BH66-JT-3710-A $19.28 $8.06 BH66-JT-5262-A $20.20 BH66-JT-5266-C $115.63 $19.28 $182.Ya NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. BH68-JT-7498-A 19 NORTHWEST HWY $199.14 $3,200.00 $199.14 $3,200.00 STRAND ASSOCIATES ENGINEERING SERVICES 19 E NORTHWEST HWY 35Q .58 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO WINDOW CLEANING $180.00 $$23.00 ***TOTAL** $3,785.17 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION VENDOR PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION $3,785.17 INVOICE AMOUNT PAGE 25 TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM CONSUMER EXPO BOOTH $345.00 $345.00 SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHARGE $5,490.04 $5,490.(0* REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $5,835.L GENERAL FUND $5,835.04 ******************************************************************************************************** CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC. AETNA TRUCK PARTS JEROME G. BEJCEK BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P. GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES HEIL-CHICAGO INC LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO. J.C. LICHT COMPANY LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI PROFESSIONAL TANK SERVICES, LI FIELD OFFICE TRAILER $230.00 FIELD OFFICE TRAILER $230.00 FIELD OFFICE TRAILER $200.00 $660.00 PARTS $23.45 $23.45 FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE $1,000.00 $1,000.00 SUPPLIES $16.32 SUPPLIES $41.70 $58.02 SERVICES RENDERED $5,409.50 $5,409.50 JANUARY RENT $2,600.00 600.10 $2;354L TIRES $177.16 L TIRES $177.16 $354 DUMP BODY $6,250.00 $6,250.00 TRACTOR $35,704.00 $35,704.00 SUPPLIES $31.28 $31.28 P19 SQUAD CONVERSION $186.40 P12 SQUAD CONVERSION $27.95 $214.35 REIMB EXPENSES $3,408.03 $3,408.03* SERVICES RENDERED $28,269.23 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 26 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 12%30/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS SERVICES RENDERED $1,169.11 $29,438.34 FOUZAT FARHAN RIHANI ASSOCIATES FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE ENGINEERING SERVICES $800.00 $11,582.46 $800.00. $11,582.46 RJN ENVIRONMENTAL PARTS $46.00 $46.00 SPRING ALIGN BARRY A. SPRINGER NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES $236.25 $1,653.75 $1,890.00 SZABO CONTRACTING NOVEMBER LEGAL FEES STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENTS $176,965.87 $59.33 $176,965.1 $59.3., TECH SYN CORPORATION SUPPLIES CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $276,494.95 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $42,709.47 CA?TIAL IMPROVEMENT $32,698.34 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT FUND CONST 1991 $10,471.28 $267.53 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS - FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $190,348.33 ******************************************************************************************************** COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $19.82 $6.61 $26.43 COMMONWEALTH EDISON SUPPLIES BG21-JT-1838-A $50.91 $19.46 $70.37 FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC BH67-JT-3858-B REMOVAL & INSTALL BANNERS $225.00 $28.56 $225.0 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES $132.89 SUPPLIES $27.42 SUPPLIES $85.72 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $96.12 SUPPLIES $299.40 SUPPLIES $8.52 SUPPLIES $107.91 $52.05 $838.59 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $36.00 ******************************************************************************************************** DEBT SERVICE FUNDS AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS BOND TRANSFER FEES $356.61 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $237.74 PAGE 27 $95,145.00 1987E PRINCIPAL l/l/92 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT /DUET 1987C PRIN1/1/922 DJT 1987C INTT $14,322.50 PAYMENT DATE 12/30/91 $4,725.00 SSA#1 PRINCIPAL VENDOR BOND PAYMENT FEES PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES CORP PURP 1974 PRIN 1/1/92 $200,000.00 PAYING AGENT FEE 1/1/992 $110.00 CORP PURP 1974 INT 1/1/92 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $95.00 $131.00* RAND POOL AND PATIO CHRISTMAS TREE & SKIRT $86.99 $86.99 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO WINDOW CLEANING $171.00 $171.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $1,549.38 GENERAL FUND $1,549.38 { ******************************************************************************************************** DEBT SERVICE FUNDS AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO NBD BANK MOUNT PROSPECT, N.A. DEBT SERVICE FUNDS BOND TRANSFER FEES $356.61 BOND TRANSFER FEES $237.74 1987B INTEREST DUE 1/1/92 $95,145.00 1987E PRINCIPAL l/l/92 $180,000.00 /DUET 1987C PRIN1/1/922 DJT 1987C INTT $14,322.50 SSA#1 INTEREST $4,725.00 SSA#1 PRINCIPAL $14,000.00 BOND PAYMENT FEES $421.50 CORP PURP 1973 INT 1/1/92 $13,750.00 CORP PURP 1973 PRIN 1/1/92 $135,000.00 CORP PURP 1974 PRIN 1/1/92 $200,000.00 PAYING AGENT FEE 1/1/992 $110.00 CORP PURP 1974 INT 1/1/92 $28,900.00 ***TOTAL** * $380,061.85* * $18,725.00* * $149,171.50- $229, 010 149,171.50* $229,010 . $776,968.35 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 $149,171.50 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974 $229,010.00 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I $18,725.00 POLICE & FIRE BUILDING B & I $356.61 FLOOD CONTROL B & I 1991 $237.74 P W FACILITY B & I 1987B $275,145.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 28 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENTDATE1230/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 19B7C $104,322.50 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $2,190,301.14 DATE RUN 12130191 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TIME RUN 15.36.34 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING SUMMARY BY FUND 12130/91 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $565,687.28 22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $12,377.67 23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $4,627.42 24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $21,812.48 41 WATER & SEWER FUND $276,300.26 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $4,624.40 48 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $42,709.47 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $138,389.80 51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $10,471.28 53 POLICE & FIRE.BOND PROCEEDS $32,698.34 56 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $267.53 58 FLOOD CONTROL CONST FUND 1991 $190,348.33 60 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 $149,171.50 61 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 1 1974 $229,010.00 62 SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I $18,725.00 64 POLICE & FIRE BUILDING B & I $356.61 67 FLOOD CONTROL B & 11991 $237.74 69 P W FACILITY B & I 1987E $275,145.00 70 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987C $104,322.50 71 POLICE PENSION FUND $40,849.07 72 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $46,290.85 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $25,878.61 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $2,190,301.14 PAGE 29 ID-APPBAR VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: JULIE FARNHAK PLANNER DATE: NOVEMBER 25, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-74-A-91, ZBA-75-SU-91, BARRY AND CLAUDIA LEVIN (MAXON SHOOTERS SUPPLIES) LOCATION: 1611 ALGONQUIN ROAD The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on text amendment and Special Use applications filed by Barry and Claudia Levin of Maxon Shooters Supplies, Inc. The applicant is requesting the following: 1. An amendment to Section 14.220I.0 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow archery and firearm shooting ranges and target areas for sports, safety and marksmanship training and including accessory retail use as a Special Use in the 1-1 Light Industrial District. 2. A Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.0 to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail at 1611 Algonquin Road. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of November 14, 1991. At the meeting James Valentino, Jr. Attorney for the petitioner introduced the proposal. He explained that this proposal is an attempt to address the concerns which led to the denial of the petitioner's previous request last year for a shooting range. Mr. Valentino then introduced the petitioner and several expert witnesses to discuss details of the facility's design, it's impact on the surroundings and other issues particularly relating to safety and environmental factors. Barry Levin, the petitioner, presented testimony relative to his qualifications to operate this facility and promote handgun safety. He is a nationally certified AFT (Bureau of Alcohol; Firearms and Treasury) agent and will ensure strict safety precautions are enforced. Mr. Levin stated that he has operated Maxon Shooters Supplies, Inc. since 1979 and hopes to keep his business in Mount Prospect. He noted that he would move his store from Northwest Highway to this location. He explained that the facility would provide separate ranges for both archery and firearms. In addition, the facility includes a classroom to provide safety instruction. The expert witnesses included: an architect, a mechanical engineer and a representative of Detroit Armor, the manufacturer of the shooting range. They explained that the proposed facility will consist of 20 firing lanes; retail and office area; and a classroom. The shooting range structure will be of prefabricated construction built to conform with OSHA, EPA and local codes. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the Zoning Ordinance does not allow shooting ranges in any zoning districts. He noted that the proposed use is John Fulton Dixon November 25, 1991 Page 2 similar in intensity to recreational centers which are allowed in more restrictive zoning districts. Staff believes that the I-1 District is the most appropriate for this type of use because it is typically separated from residential uses. He noted that as a special use any future requests for a shooting range would be subject to the public hearing process. He explained that "accessory retail" is intended to be similar to a pro shop and would only be allowed in the I-1 District in conjunction with a shooting range. He indicated that staff recommends that the Special Use Permit be subject to the 9 standards proposed by the petitioner in his previous request last year. Approximately 40 people, most indicating that the were Mount Prospect residents, were in the audience to support the request. No objectors were present. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request and raised several specific questions relative to safety enforcement and environmental impacts. Members stated that this location addressed many of the concerns they had with the petitioner's previous request. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a text amendment to allow archery and firearms shooting ranges, including accessory retail as a Special Use in the I-1 Light Industrial District and to grant a Special Use Permit to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail at 1611 Algonquin Road subject to the following conditions: 1. The facility is located entirely in an enclosed building. 2. The operator shall be a dealer licensed by the United States Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. 3. An adult attendant trained in the safe use of firearms shall be on duty during all times of operation. 4. The operator shall regularly sponsor and promote training on the premises of safe handling and use of firearms. 5. Only persons who are registered owners of firearms shall be allowed to use the range, as evidenced by a firearm owner's identification card. 6. No shotguns or center -fire rifles shall be used on the range. 7. No activity shall be conducted in or near the premises that violates any federal, state, or local law relating to the possession, ownership, use or discharge of firearms. 8. All applicable sound and environmental regulations shall be met as a continuing condition of operation. 9. Hours of operation shall not be greater than 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily. Approved: kt� L��Y►'l David M. Clements, Director TIM ! _��g �w �» �w { �' �^� ' ` , (y/: - �� �� �_.�:��-� /6\.l��f 9| 3}� ? S \ 6` ©(( MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO -74-A-91 Hearing Date: November 14, 1991 75 -SU -91 PETITIONER: Barry and Claudia Levin (Maxon Shooters Supplies, Inc.) SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1611 Algonquin Road PUBLICATION DATE: October 29, 1991 REQUEST: An Amendment to Section 14.2201.0 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow archery and firearm shooting ranges and target areas for sports, safety and marksmanship training and including accessory retail use as a special use in the I -I Light Industrial District. A Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.0 to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail at 16-11 Algonquin Road. MEMBERS PRESENT: Ronald Cassidy, Chairman Pro Ten Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano ABSENT• Gilbert Basnik Chairman OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Full Audience Mr. Cassidy, Chairman Pro Tem, introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting an amendment to Section 14.2201.0 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow archery and firearm shooting ranges and target areas for sports, safety and marksmanship training and including accessory retail use as a Special Use in the I-1 Light Industrial District. Also, a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.0 to allow an archery and firearms shooting range at 1611 Algonquin Road. The petitioner,, Barry Levin of Maxon Shooters Supplies, Inc., presented his case stating that he is the owner of Maxon Shooter Supplies, Inc., and then presented his attorney, Mr— James Valentino Jr. . Mr. Valentino then thanked the Planning and Zoning Department for the help in finding the petitioner ZBA-74-A-91 ZBA-75-SU-91 November 14, 1991 Page 2 of 7 a new location. He stated that the petitioner was before this Board one year ago with a similar request which was denied because it was too close to a residential area. Mr. Valentino stated that this will be the second shooting range in the Village of Mount Prospect. He stated that the first shooting range is located at the fire station at Golf & Busse Rds. He noted that that shooting range does not cause noise or create fumes. Mr. Valentino stated that the Board is familiar with this case noting that it was presented a year ago. He stated that this new facility will not cause handicap or hindrance on the community but will be a benefit. There will be no nuisance from the noise noting that the building will be soundproofed. The ventilation equipment will ensume that the discharged air is cleaner than the air outside. This facility will compliment the adjoining uses. He stated that this new location is in an Industrial area and noted that most other uses will be closed when the majority of patrons come to use the facility. Mr. Levin will also provide a classroom in the facility to teach people about firearms safety. Mr. Valentino then called upon Mr. Barry Levin., Mr. Levin stated that he has been in the firearm industry since 1979. He has owned the store located on Northwest Highway since 1984. Mr. Levin stated that before he opened the store he managed a store in Hanover Park for 4 years. He teaches safety and how to operate firearms. The archery range will be separate from the shooting range noting that the hours of operation will be 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays and 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. on weekends. He noted that the busiest time will be on the weekends or after 6 p.m. on the weekdays. The type of customer that uses the establishment are typical, husbands and wives, fathers and sons. The classroom is to teach safety before the customer uses the range. Mr Levin stated that he has been training people about firearms for years and has also worked with Detroit Fire Arms and has a safety certificate. Mr. Levin stated that he has a large clientele and will not depend on driveby or walk-in customers noting that it will be more word of mouth with the new location. Mr. Pratt questioned if the petitioner is moving the entire business to the new location. Mr. Levin stated that yes he will close down the store at the Northwest Highway location. Mr. Valentino then called Mr. George Baker, architect. Mr. Baker stated that he has been an architect for 16 years. ZBA-74-A-91 ZBA-75-SU-91 November 14, 1991 Page 3 of 7 He stated that the exterior facade will have no changes except for signage for the store. There will be 35 parking spaces and if additional spaces is needed the owner said they can be provided. There will be florescent lighting in the retail and range areas. There will be acoustic material used in the shooting range. there will be 12" concrete block on all sides and sound material in the target range. The site plan shows the building to be 400' off Busse Road. The space is 66' x 140' which is a total of 9000 square feet. The proposed floor plan will use the existing entrance, the retail area will be 1900 square feet. He noted that the 12" concrete block will also be between the retail area and the range. Mrs. Skowron questioned where the archery range will be. Mr. Levin stated that the target range will be converted to an archery range in the late summer and early fall. They will alternate the use of the range. Mr. Valentino then introduced Mr. Bob Martin, of O'Hare Engineering HVAC. Mr. Martin stated that he has been in the HVAC business for about 20 years. He stated that the system that will be installed will comply with the EPA and OSHA and the local Codes. The system contains the same filters as in hospitals noting that the discharged air will be cleaner than outside. Mr. Valentino then introduced Tracy Newton from Detroit Armor. Mr. Newton stated that he has been with the company for about 8 years, noting that his company just celebrated their 65th anniversary. Mr. Newton stated that he constructs ranges not only nationwide but worldwide. He stated that he recently did the renovation in the fire station for the Village of Mount Prospect. He stated that there is no possibility of a bullet escaping or coming back at the shooter. The lead is recyclable in a contained area. The ceiling will be balistically secured panels. The bullets will be retrieved in a bullet trap area. The sound was recently tested at another facility and the noise could not be heard outside. Mr. Lannon questioned the side walls of the facility. Mr. Newton stated that the petitioner is using 12" concrete block for added safety noting that the requirement is only S.. Mr. Pratt questioned if there is an annual inspection of ZEA -74-A-91 ZEA -75 -SII -91 November 14, 1991 Page 4 of 7 shooting ranges. Mr. Newton stated that there are periodic inspections of the bullet traps. Mr. Pratt questioned if the government or a clean -air organization does inspections. Mr. Newton stated he was not aware of any such inspections. Mr. Saviano stated that the staff report states 1100 square feet of retail space. Mr. Baker stated that the petitioner has since changed the plans and opted for more retail space. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, thanked the applicant for a thorough presentation. Mr. Clements stated that the I -I district doesn't include the proposed use in its lists of permitted, prohibited or special uses. The petitioner is requesting to amend the I-1 text to allow archery and firearms shooting ranges as a special use in this district. He noted that there was an attempt to meet concerns at 1611 Algonquin Road that were expressed with the original request last year. The text amendment that the applicant is proposing is not listed as a specific use anywhere in the Zoning Ordinance so a text amendment would be required to allow this use in any zoning district. Staff believes that a shooting range is similar in intensity and purpose as other sport facilities included in the definition of "recreation centers". He noted that the 1-1 district is typically remote and isolated from residential districts. Staff believes this might be*VpPropriate district for this use. As a Special Use all requests would be subject to the public hearing process and reviewed on a case specific basis. The facility will consist of 20 lanes, office retail and classroom space. He noted that the standards are compatible with the area and the safety and enviormental concerns were addressed by the petitioners experts. The parking proposed is sufficient but must be striped. Staff has no objections to the proposal. Mr. Lannon questioned a retail business going into an I -I district. He noted that 10% was recently allowed as .accessory retail" in the Rogers Corporate Park and this is about 20% .' He has concerns about the future retail requests arvithe impact on parking in an 1-1 district. Mr. Clements stated that the retail is secondary to the ZBA-74-A-91 ZBA-75-SU-91 November 14, 1991 Page 5 of 7 primary use. He stated that the text amendment only allows retail use a9l accessory to a shooting range which would be a special use requiring a hearing process. Retail uses are not otherwise permitted in the I-1 district. Mr. Cassidy stated a concern for the text amendment questioning if this would open doors for retail in Kensington Center. Mr. Clements stated that as a special use any proposed retail in an I -I district would have to have a public hearing and staff would look at the location and the type of business. He noted that the pro -Posed amendment would allow retail in conjunction with a shooting range. He also stated that shooting ranges are a unique use and staff doesn't anticipate a large demand for more ranges. Mr. Cassidy questioned the operations attendants. Mr. Levin stated that there will be four employees there at any time and that all employees will be certified. Mr. Cassidy questioned the weekday time for, 10 a.m. to 9 p.m. Mr. Levin stated the time is so clients won't be rushed after work. Mr. Cassidy questioned what type of firearms will be allowed. Mr. Levin stated that the majority will be handguns and some rim fired (low power) rifles. He noted that he will control what is used on the range and all firearms will be inspected when they are brought into the range. The individuals must bring the firearm in a case and unloaded. They must also be certified. Mr. Pratt questioned the alarm system. Mr. Levin stated that he now uses Honeywell and will use then at the new location. Mr. Saviano questioned what the 4 employees would be doing. Mr. Levin stated that they will be where ever they are needed. Mr. Lannon stated that this is a better location and the ZBA-74-A-91 ZBA-7 5 -SU- 91 November 14, 1991 Page 6 of 7 Village and state already allow firearms to be sold.and there should be a facility where customers can be trained to use the firearms. However he believes that condition 42 requiring that the operator be a licensed dealer is anti competitive, pamoppkFt . He is not criticizing but feels this will restrict other establishments of the same use in the future. Mr. Clements noted that the proposed conditions only apply to this specific request and facility. The conditions are not - part of the text amendment, but conditions on the Special Use permit. Mr. Levin noted that he didn't want to leave Mount Prospect and thanked Ken Fritz for helping him find this property. Mrs. Skowron discussed the experts testimony noting that she does not believe the safety and enviormental technology has changed in one year. However this new location is much more appropriate for the proposed use. She appreciates the petitioners efforts to relocate in Mount Prospect and supports the request. Mr. Cassidy then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request of an amendment to Section 14.2201.0 of the zoning Ordinance to allow archery and firearm shooting ranges and target areas for sports, safety and marksmanship training and including accessory retail use as a Special Use in the I-1 Light Industrial District. Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Lannon seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Brottrager, Skowron, Cassidy NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. Mr. Cassidy then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001. C to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail at 1611 Algonquin Road. Subject to the following conditions: 1. The facility is located entirely in an enclosed building. 2. The operator shall be a dealer licensed by the -United States Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. ZBA-74-A-91 ZBA-75-SU-91 November 14, 1991 Page 7 of 7 3. An adult attendant trained in the safe use of firearms shall be on duty during all times of operation. - 4. The operator shall regularly sponsor and promote training on the premises of safe handling and use of firearms. 5. Only persons who are registered owners of firearms shall be allowed to use the range, as evidenced by a firearm owner's identification card. 6. No shotguns or center -fire rifles shall be used on the range. 7. No activity shall be conducted in or near the premises that violates any federal, state, or local law relating to the possession, ownership, use or discharge of firearms. 8. All applicable sound and environmental regulations shall be met as a continuing condition of operation. 9. Hours of operation shall not be greater than 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. daily. Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Pratt seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron, Cassidy NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary V, --AGE OF MOUNT PROSPE(-,-.,. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN *,,- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: NOVEMBER 4, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-74-A-91, ZBA-75-SU-91 APPLICANT: BARRY AND CLAUDIA LEVIN (MAXON SHOOTERS SUPPLIES) ADDRESS: 1611 ALGONQUIN ROAD LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: 1-1 Light Industrial LOT SIZE: 9,520 sq. ft. (leased area) % COVERAGE: N/A F.A.R. : N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 REQUEST The applicant is requesting: 1. An amendment to Section 14.2201.0 of the Zoning Ordinance to allow archery and firearm shooting ranges and target areas for sports, safety and marksmanship training and including accessory retail use as a Special Use in the 1-1 Light Industrial District. 2. A Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.0 to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail at 1611 Algonquin Road. Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to install an archery and firearms shooting range with accessory retail and office at 1611 Algonquin Road. This is one of five tenant spaces in this warehouse building. The property is zoned I-1 Light Industrial which doesn't include the proposed use in its lists of permitted, prohibited or special uses. Subsequently, the applicant is requesting to amend the I-1 text to allow archery and firearms shooting range as a special use in this district. Concurrently, the applicant is requesting a special use permit to install and operate a shooting range. One year ago the applicants proposed a similar request for a shooting range in conjunction with their retail gun store at 500 East Northwest Highway. This proposal was met with much opposition from surrounding residents with concerns about safety and environmental impacts. The request was subsequently denied by the Zoning Board of Appeals and Village Board. The primary objection to this proposal was the proximity of the shooting range to residential property. Some members of the Zoning Board of Appeals and Village Board acknowledged the need for the shooting range, but felt it was incompatible with surrounding residential uses. The current proposed industrial location is an attempt to meet the concerns expressed with the original request. Text Amendment The applicant is proposing to open a shooting range and accessory retail gun supply store in one of the tenant spaces in a warehouse building which is zoned I-1 Light Industrial. The Zoning Ordinance does not list "shooting range" as a specific use in any category Therefore, the applicant is requesting a text amendment to include .shooting ranges" as a special use in the 1-1 District. Staff believes that a shooting range is similar in intensity and purpose as other sport facilities included in the definition of "recreation centers.": "A building, buildings, or use of land operated on a profit basis, with or without membership requirements, for the provision of entertainment, sport, Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 or healtb/exercises facilities directly to the consumer, including and limited to racquet facilities, swimming pool, exercise and weightlifting facilities, basketball courts, jogging track, sauna, whirlpool, suntan booth and accessory uses; such accessory uses subject to the approval of the Zoning Administrator. Staff notes that recreation centers are not permitted i ' n the 1-1 District but are permitted in the B-3 District which is more restrictive. However, while a shooting range is similar to other sport facilities, the unique safety and environmental concerns require specific consideration. These are addressed as conditions for the Special Use request. While the staff does not believe amending the Zoning Ordinance to accommodate a specific use is the best administrative approach, it is understood that there are unique uses that need to be accommodated in the community. Staff points out that the previous request for this use demonstrated that it would not be considered a compatible use in a commercial district near a residential area. Also, it should be noted that Planning and Zoning staff made the petitioner aware of this building. While recognizing the zoning issues involved with the matter, it was believed that this was a good location for the use, and that it was important to try and keep the facility in the Village as an economic development effort. The 1-1 District which generally includes more remote sites, physically separated from residential districts, may be more suitable to this type of use. It would be reasonable to amend the I- 1 District to provide for this use, based on findings from the initial application. However, the facility should be limited to a special use category so the safety and environmental concerns can be adequately addressed, making all such facilities subject to the public hearing process. 2. Special Use Permit Concurrent with the proposed text amendment, the applicant is requesting a special use permit to allow an archery and firearms shooting range and accessory retail at 1611 Algonquin Road. The proposed facility will include 20 shooting lanes; 1,160 sq. ft. of retail area; offices; a classroom; and storage area. All special use requests must satisfy the special use standards set forth in the Zoning Ordinance. These standards primarily address the issue of the compatibility of the proposed use with surrounding uses and the suitability of the specific site to the proposed use. With regard to these standards, staff has the following comments and concerns: 1. Impact on Surrouriding Uses. The primary concern relates to safety and environmental issues. Safety was a major concern with the previous request due to the proximity of residential development. In the proposed industrial location, these concerns are minimized because there are fewer people, particularly children, in the Immediate area. However, the safety of employees and customers of the other businesses is a concern. Testimony during the previous request indicated that the facility would be built to minimize any safety concerns as well as noise and ventilation concerns. In addition, the operator and on duty staff would ensure that patrons conduct themselves in a safe and legal manner. Police Chief Pavlock indicated that his staff would cooperate with the petitioner on all matters related to this use. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4 . The applicant states the proposed hours of operation to be: Monday through Friday, 10:00 a.m. - 9:00 pm. and Saturday and Sunday, 10:00 am. - 6:00 p.m. for both the shooting range and the retail gun shop. He anticipates that most of the shooting range business will occur in the evenings and on weekends when other businesses in the building are closed. In addition, the retail store is not walk-in oriented and should not generate a lot of customer traffic. It is expected that there will be' some overlap between retail customers and people using the range facility. 2. Ay-ailable Paddng This property has an existing non -conforming parking lot, therefore, the ordinance only requires additional parking in the amount that the new use exceeds the parking requirement for the existing use. The applicant must provide 21 spaces for the facility, which would be adequate for the proposed use. In addition to these items, at the prior public hearing, the petitioner suggested a number of conditions to regulate the use, as a method of eliminating concerns about an adverse impact from the facility. It is suggested that the following items be included as governing conditions with the Special Use request. 1. The facility is located entirely in an enclosed building. 2. The operator shall be a dealer licensed by the United States Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. 3. An adult attendant trained in the safe use of firearms shall be on duty during all times of operation. 4. The operator shall regularly sponsor and promote training on the premises of safe handling and use of firearms. S. Only persons who are registered owners of firearms shall be allowed to use the range, as evidenced by a firearm owner's identification card. 6. No shotguns or center -fire rifles shall be used on the range. 7. No activity shall be conducted in or near the premises that violates any federal, state, or local law relating to the possession, ownership, use or discharge of firearms. 8. All applicable sound and environmental regulations shall be met as a continuing condition of operation. 9. Hours of operation shall not be greater than 10:00 am. to 10:00 p.m. daily. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: This property is surrounded by a mix of industrial and commercial uses. Some of the surrounding property is zoned R -X, however, the Comprehensive Plan suggests a mix of industrial and commercial uses. This Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 5 zoning classification was granted at the time the property was annexed and has not been rezoned. Existing uses are considered legal non -conforming... No major concerns were expressed by other staff. The Police Department noted that they are willing to work with the petitioner on safety issues. S .�. RYMECOMMENDATI(iN Testimony during the applicant's previous request for a shooting range indicate that there is demand and a need for this type of facility. However, the Zoning Ordinance doesn't currently recognize this use. The I-1 Light Industrial District may be the most appropriate location for this type of use because it is in many areas, physically separated from residential uses. Staff believes that as a Special Use, any request for this use would be subject to strict standards, and public review to ensure compatibility on a case specific basis. With regard to the proposed facility, staff has no objections to the use in this location provided the Special Use standards are satisfied. The applicant must demonstrate that the facility will not produce noise or other environmental impacts that will negatively effect the surrounding tenants and properties. Staff notes that the I-1 District includes performance standards for noise and other environmental factors which must be complied with in addition to any other pertinent environmental regulations. The applicant must also obtain written permission from the property owner to have at least 21 parking spaces available for his use exclusively. If new parking spaces are created, a stripping plan must be submitted for review by staff. Staff also recommends that the Special Use be subject to the nine conditions previously listed. DMC:hg CAF/ 12/11/91 M-0 0 4 'ki El 4116)M z 00 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XXII OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE WHEREAS, Maxon Shooters Supplies (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for a text amendment to Chapter 14 (Zoning ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting the following amendment to Section 14.2201.0.7 of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect: 7. To allow archery and firearm shooting ranges and target areas for sports,safety and marksmanship training and including accessory retail use as a Special Use; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the text amendment requested, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 74-A-91 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 14th day of November, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 29th day of October, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the request being the subject of ZBA 74-A-91 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That Section 14.2201.0 of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance), as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new paragraph 7; so that hereinafter said Section 14.2201,C.7 shall be and read as follows: 117. Archery and firearm shooting ranges and target areas for sports, safety and marksmanship training, including accessory retail use. 11 SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and I ZBA 74-V-91 Page 2 of 2 effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk CAF/ 12/11/91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY GENER ALLY GONOUIN RQA RLOCATED AT 1611 AL WHEREAS, Maxon Shooters Supplies (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property located at 1611 Algonquin Road Highway (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Semrow's Addition, being a Subdivision of Lot 1 in Algonquin -Busse Industrial Park in part of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use to permit an archery and firearms shooting range and target areas for sports safety and marksmanship training, including accessory retail; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 75 -SU -91, before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 14th day of November, 1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 29th day of October, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the requests being the subject of ZBA 75 -SU -91. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: 'The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant the following Special Use to the subject property: To allow an archery and firearms shooting range and target areas for sports safety and marksmanship training, including accessory retail; and including accessory retail. The Special Use granted herein is subject to the following conditions: 1. The facility shall be located entirely in an enclosed building. 2. The operator shall be a dealer licensed by the United State Department of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms. 3. An adult attendant trained in the safe use of firearms shall be on duty during all times of operation. LA101 ZBA 75 -SU -91 Page 2 of 2 4. The operator shall regularly sponsor and promote training on the premises of safe handling and use of firearms in a permanently designated classroom, as depicted on the attached Site Plan, hereinafter referred to as Exhibit "A". 5. Only persons who are registered owners of firearms shall be allows to use the range, as evidenced by a firearm owner's identification card. 6. No shotguns or center -fire rifles shall be used on the range. 7. No activity shall be conducted in or near the premises that violates any federal, state or local law relating to the possession, ownership, use or discharge of firearms. 8. All applicable sound and environmental regulations shall be met as a continuing condition of operation. 9. Hours of operation shall not be greater than 10:00 A.M. to 10:00 P.M. daily. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk 1 1991. CAF/ 12/31/91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SCHEDULE VII OF ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE; That Schedule VII of Article XX entitled "Sunday Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom the wording "Pine St. West 6:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Btw. Evergreen Ave. '& 150 ft. south of Lincoln St." and by deleting the wording "Pine St. East 6:30 a.m. to 1:30 p.m. Btw. Evergreen Ave. & 320 ft. north of Evergreen Ave." SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1992. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk EMP72 IN Gerald L. Farley Village President Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 3, 1992 SUBJECT: REFERENDUM QUESTION IN ORDINANCE FORM Attached is an Ordinance which includes the question which clearly identifies who will be paying for the purchase of the water and sewer system from Citizens' Utilities in cooperation with the City of Prospect Heights. The amount of $23 million is not on this question since it is somewhat confusing because that number includes a significant amount of contingencies and legal fees and in my estimation would cause more voters to be inclined to vote "no" if there is a statement that the cost will be $23 million when in fact it may not. We do know that the cost will be under $100 per year. We will have those numbers refined very shortly and that information will be prepared for the citizen meetings we will be having very shortly. In the meantime, we have had extensive discussions with Prospect Heights concerning the question and anticipating that the same question will be used in both Ordinances. We found out late Friday afternoon that the attached verbiage is the language that is in the Ordinance for the City of Prospect Heights. We are not able to get a hold of the attorney or Administrator of Prospect Heights, They were both out of the office today and we will be attempting to contact them on Monday. I personally feel that both of the questions should read substantially the same. While the intents are the same in both of them, they do not read substantially the same. I will be trying to clarify this as well as Buzz Hill who is also trying to contact the attorney for Prospect Heights to determine why there was a change made today on their Ordinance. We will have further information for you on Tuesday evening, 0—fig ;��T'�N �DON i ON JFD/rcc attachment IWO Shall the Village of Mount Prospect participate with the City of Prospect Heights in the purchase of the water and sewer facilities of Citizens Utilities Company of Illinois located within the Village of Mount Prospect and the City of Prospect Heights all located within incorporated portions of Wheeling Township, said purchase to be paid for by charges against those persons and entities serviced by said water and sewer facilities? " 1/3/92 BH/CAF ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE BALLOT OR THE MARCH 1.7A 1292 PRIMR-Y ELECTION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That pursuant to the authority vested in the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect by Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, 1970, an advisory referendum shall be held in the village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, during the general election to be held March 17, 1992, for the purpose of submitting to the voters the following proposition: Shall the Village of Mount Prospect, in cooperation with the City of Prospect Heights, purchase, maintain and operate (to be paid for by the users of the system) the water and sewer system now owned by the Citizens Utility Company of Illinois and located within the incorporated portions of Wheeling Township? 11 SECTION TWO: That the local election official shall certify the above public question to the Cook County Clerk and Cook County Election Department, in the manner provided by law. SECTION THREE: That Notice of said election shall be published and the form of the ballot shall be prepared in the form and manner provided by law. SECTION FOUR: That said advisory referendum regarding said public question and all matters pertaining thereto shall be conducted in the manner prescribed by statute for and during the aforesaid primary election. SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPF&T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER bw-- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: JANUARY 2, 1992 SUBJECT: TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Attached please find a revised Page 3 for Exhibit C of the ordinance for the Triangle Redevelopment Project. This change is underlined, and pertains to Trustee Clowes' comments about our developer participating in property acquisition. DMC:hg Attachment 4. Underground parking for residential units is encouraged. 5. The use of shared parking utilizing off-peak operating hours should be encouraged. F. Pedestrian Movement 1. Pedestrian access and movement through the site should be an important part of the plan. Public and private pedestrian sidewalks should be provided, and conflicts with automobile traffic should be minimized on-site. 2. Provide direct pedestrian connections from the redevelopment area to adjoining areas to encourage pedestrian movement to or from other adjacent commercial areas. G. Village Participation 1. The Village owns the 2.26 acre site on Pine Street. The municipality should consider flexible and innovative methods to convey this parcel to the selected developer. 2. The municipality should consider economic incentives proposed by the selected developer. 3. The Village should consider appropriate use of condemnation and land clearance of properties in order to implement redevelopment. 4. Vacation of existing public streets and alleys may be considered for the appropriate plan. 5. The Village may assemble property to the extent feasible, hul also expects the aelected developer to assemble and acquire property in the redevelgpment area. -3- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO THE REDEVELOPMENT OF REAL ESTATE WITHIN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois ("Village") is an Illinois Home Rule Municipality pursuant to the provisions of Article VII, Section 6, of the Illinois Constitution of 1970 and as such, the Village may exercise any power and perform any function pertaining to its government and affairs; and WHEREAS, the subject matter of this ordinance pertains to the government and affairs of the Village and its residents; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village has determined it to be in the best interests of the Village and its residents to legislate in the area of redevelopment of certain real estate within the corporate limits of the Village which qualifies as a conservation area, as defined herein; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village has determined that it is in the promotion and protection of the health, safety, morals and welfare of the citizens of the Village and the public to provide for the maintenance and revitalization of conservation areas by reducing or eliminating those conditions, the existence'of which qualify an area as a conservation area and the stimulation of economic development and the planning, execution and implementation of redevelopment projects in designated areas; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village has determined that the maintenance and revitalization of conservation areas by reducing or eliminating those conditions, the existence of which qualify an area as a conservation area and the stimulation of economic development and the planning, execution and implementation of redevelopment projects in designated areas, financed by public and/or private capital, with financial assistance from governmental bodies, if necessary, in the manner provided for in this Ordinance, are hereby declared to be public purposes and public uses essential for the public interest; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village has determined it is essential to the economic and social welfare of the Village that conservation areas be maintained and revitalized, by assuring opportunities for development and/or redevelopment in attracting sound and stable commercial and related economic growth; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village has determined that the exercise of the powers provided for in this Ordinance is dedicated to the promotion of the public interest and to the enhancement of the tax base of the Village, and the use of such powers for the development and redevelopment of conservation areas in the Village is hereby declared to be a public purpose and public use essential to the public interest. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: DEFINITIONS. As used in this Ordinance, unless the context requires otherwise: a. "Real Property" means lands, lands under water, structures and any or all easements, franchises and incorporeal hereditaments, estates and rights, legal and equitable, including I without limitation terms for years and liens by way of judgment, mortgage or otherwise. b. "Conservation Area" means any improved or vacant area or parcel of real--j-statelocated within the territorial limits of the Village, in which: (i) if improved, because of a combination of three (3) or more of the following factors: age; dilapidation; obsolescence; deterioration; illegal use of individual structures; presence of structures below minimum Village and BOCA code standards; abandonment; excessive vacancies; overcrowding of structures and community facilities; lack of ventilation, light or sanitary facilities; inadequate utilities; excessive land coverage; deleterious land use or layout; depreciation of physical maintenance; and/or lack of community planning, is detrimental to the public, safety, health, moral or welfare; (ii) if vacant, the sound growth of the area is impaired by a combination of two or more of the ,following factors: obsolete platting of the vacant land; diversity of ownership of such land; tax and special assessment delinquencies on such land; flooding on all or part of such vacant land; and/or deterioration of structures or site improvements in neighboring areas adjacent to the vacant land. C. "Redevelopment Project" means a general outline of development objectives anddesignguidelines for development or redevelopment intended to reduce or eliminate those conditions the existence of which qualified the redevelopment project area as a conservation area. d. "Redevelo ment Project Are means an area or parcel of real estate designated by the Village which is not less in the aggregate than 1 1/2 acres and in respect to which the Village has made a finding that there exist conditions which caused the area or parcel to be classified as a conservation area, and which is to be developed or redeveloped in accordance with a redevelopment project. e. "Redevelopment Project Costs" means and includes the sum total of all reasonable and necessary costs incurred or estimated to be incurred pursuant, and any such costs incidental to a redevelopment project. Such costs may include, without limitation, the following: (i) costs of studies, surveys, development of plans and specifications, planning, implementation, administration and execution of a redevelopment project, including without limitation staff and professional service costs for architectural, engineering, legal, marketing, financial, planning or other services; (ii) real property assembly costs, including without limitation the acquisition of real property and other property, real or personal, or rights or interests therein, demolition of buildings and the clearance and grading of real property; (iii) costs of rehabilitation, reconstruction or repair or remodeling of existing public or private buildings, facilities and fixtures; (iv) costs of construction of public works or improvements; (v) costs of job training and retraining projects; (vi) financing costs, including without limitation all necessary and incidental expenses relating to the issuance of obligations which may include payment of interest on any obligations issued hereunder accruing during the estimated period of construction of any redevelopment project for which such obligations are issued and including reasonable reserves related thereto; (vii) relocation costs, to the extent that the Village determines that relocation costs shall be paid or are required by federal or state law; (viii) costs of advanced vocational edodaE,7loo or career education, including but not limited to courses in occupational, semi -technical or technical fields leading directly to employment, provided that such costs are related to the establishment and maintenance of additional job training, advanced vocational education or career education programs for persons employed or to be employed by employers located in a redevelopment project area; (ix) interest coot incurred by a r6developer related to the construction, renovation or rehabilitation of a redevelopment groject. SECTION 2: POWERS OF CORPORATE AOTaORzzznS' In planning, executing and implementing a redevelopment project, the corporate authorities of the Village shall have the following powers, in addition to those powers provided for by law: ' a. Approve redevelopment projects and designate redevelopment project areas. Prior to such approval and designation, the corporate authorities of the Village may provide for a study and survey to determine if a particular area is to be classified as a donservation area and for a public hearing on the classification of aparticular area as a conservation area and the adoption and/or approval of a redevelopment project and/or designation of a redevelopment project area. At least ten days before any such hearing the Village clerk shall give notice of the hearing by publication at least once in a newspaper of general circulati*on within the village; b. Make and enter irGto all contracts necessary or incidental to the planning, execution, implementation and furtherance nfa redevelopment project/ o. Within a redevelopment project area, acquire real property and other properties, real or personal, by purchase, donation, lease or eminent domain; own, convey, lease, mortgage or dispose of real property and other properties, real or personal, or rights or interests therein; and grant or acquire licenses, easements and options with respect thereto, all in the manner and at such price the municipality determines as reasonably necessary to achieve the objectives of the redevelopment project. No conveyance, leaser mortgage, disposition of real estate or other property, real or gerenouI, or an agreement relating to the development or redevelopment of the real property shall be made except upon the adoption of an ordinance by the corporate authorities of the village- No conveyance, lease, mortgage or other disposition of real estate or other property, real or personal, or an agreement relating to the development or redevelopment of real property shall be made without making public disclosure of the terms of the disposition and all bids and proposals made in response to the Village's request. The procedures for obtaining such bids and proposals shall provide reasonable opportunity for any person to submit alternative proposals or bids; d. Within a redevelopment project area, clear any area by demolition or removal of any existing buildings and structures; e. within a redevelopment project area, renovate or rehabilitate or construct any structure, facility or building; f. Install, repair, construct, reconstruct or relocate streets, utilities and site improvements essential to the preparation of the redevelopment project area for use in accordance with a redevelopment project; g. Within a redevelopment project area, fix, charge and collect fees, rents and charg-es for the use of any building or real property owned or leased by the Village or any part thereof or facility therein; h. Accept grants, guarantees and donations of property, labor or other things of value from a public or private source for use within a redevelopment project area; i. Acquire and construct public real property and/or facilities within a redevelopment project area; j. Incur redevelopment project costs; k. Apply for and accept capital grants and loans from the United States, State of Illinois or any instrumentality of the United States or the State of Illinois for the development and/or redevelopment of a conservation area; 1. To borrow funds as the Village may deem necessary for the purpose of development and/or redevelopment and issue such obligations or revenue bonds as the Village may deem necessary, subject to applicable statutory limitations, if any; M. Employ all such persons as may be necessary for the planning, administration, execution and implementation of a redevelopment project; n. Exercise any and all other powers as the Village may deem necessary to effectuate the purposes of this ordinance. SECTION 3: All ordinances or parts of ordinances in conflict the foregoing provisions are repealed. SECTION 4: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from andafterits passage and approval as provided by law. PASSED the following roll call vote this day of 199 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSENT FROM COMMENT AND VOTE: APPROVED this day of 199 Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ELIGIBILITY REPORT AND TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS. WHEREAS, the Village has caused to be prepared a document entitled "Triangle Redevelopment Project Eligibility Report" (hereinafter, the "Report") and a document entitled "Triangle Redevelopment Project" (hereinafter, the "Project"), pursuant to Village Ordinance No. for the real property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area"), copies of which Report and Project are attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibits B and C, respectively; and I WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village caused a public hearing to be held and completed relative to the Project and designation of the proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area on December 17, 1991 at the Village's Senior Center; and WHEREAS, due notice with respect to such hearing was given by publication on December 6, 1991; and WHEREAS, the Report sets forth the conditions in the proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area qualifying the area as a "Conservation Area" and the Board of Trustees of the village has reviewed testimony concerning said conditions and is generally informed of the conditions causing the proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area to qualify as a Conservation Area as defined in Village Ordinance No. and as set forth in the Report; and WHEREAS, the Project sets forth a general outline of development objectives and design guidelines for development or redevelopment intended to reduce or eliminate those conditions, the existence of which qualify the proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area as a Conservation Area, as defined in Village Ordinance No. and as set forth in the Report, and the Board of Trustees of the Village has reviewed and is informed of the Report and the Project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby makes the following findings: 1. The area constituting the proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois is legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. There exist conditions which cause the area proposed to be designated as the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area to be classified as a Conservation Area, as defined in Village Ordinance No. 3. The Project sets forth a general outline of development objectives and design guidelines for development or redevelopment intended to reduce or eliminate those conditions, the existence of which qualified the proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area as a Conservation Area, as defined in Village Ordinance No. I SECTION 2: The Triangle Redevelopment Project Eligibility Report and Triangle Redevelopment Project, copies of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibits B and C, respectively, are hereby adopted and approved. SECTION 3: The Village's giving of notice of the December 17, T-991public hearing on the Project and designation of the proposed Triangle Redevelopment Project Area, by publication as aforesaid, is hereby ratified and approved. SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from '�nd —after its passage and approval as provided by law. PASSED the following roll call vote this day of 199 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSENT FROM COMMENT AND VOTE: APPROVED this day of — 199 Village President ATTEST: V-17Tage CI erg EXHIBIT A Lot 1 in Wille's Reconsolidation Plat; Lots 1, 19, 18 and the north 23.72' of Lot 17 in Busse & Wille's Resubdivision in Mt. Prospect; Lot A in Corporate Subdivision #8 Village of Mt. Prospect; Lot A in Corporate Subdivision #3 of Village of Mt. Prospect; all of Desiderata Subdivision and the north 150' of the west 15T of Lot 1 in Busse & Wille's Resubdivision in Mt. Prospect; all in the west 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 41, Range 11 east of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois; and; Lot 1 in Novakovic's Resubdivision; Lot 1 in John Flowers' Resubdivision; and Lot I in Winkelman's Resubdivision; all in the east 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 41, Range 11 east of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois. Permanent Index Numbers: 08-12-101-018 08-12-100-012 08-12-101-004 08-12-100-013 08-12-101-001 08-12-100-007 08-12-101-015 08-12-100-008 08-12-101-017 08-11-204-015 08-12-100-014 08-11-204-016 08-11-204-017 EXHIBIT "B" (to be distributed) EXHIBIT C BACKGROUND 12/10/91 The area of downtown Mount Prospect bounded by Northwest Highway, Central Road and Wille Street, like certain other areas of the Central Business District, has not been subject to growth and redevelopment by the private sector. Conditions of building age, deterioration, obsolescence and other factors indicate that physical and economic conditions would make this portion of the Central Business District eligible for redevelopment as a conservation area. This will allow the investment of public funds in accordance with an approved plan, in order to reduce or eliminate conditions leading to the designation as a conservation area. This designation is necessary as redevelopment is not anticipated without adoption of this redevelopment project. The following objectives and design guidelines shall serve as a framework for the project, to provide the basis for a coordinated redevelopment meeting the goals of the Village and the demands of the marketplace. OBJECTIVES AND DESIGN GUIDELINES A. Development Objectives 1. Create an innovative development that encourages a suburban scale mixed use project that explores all market potentials, is harmonious with the surrounding residential area and can attract residents of Northwest Cook County area. 2. Create a development that can stimulate other private sector investment in the triangle and adjoining areas, including new construction, expansion and rehabilitation. 3. Provide a development that can yield the highest possible real estate and sales tax to the Village consistent with other downtown development objectives. A financial analysis should be submitted so that revenue figures can be examined. 4. Protect and enhance the present retail and service businesses in the Downtown Area. The redevelopment project shall serve to improve the image of the Downtown Area recognizing its potential as a focal point for the town center. B. Land Use 1. A full range of retail and service commercial uses together with select professional office space and residential should be encouraged. The concept of mixed commercial and residential and/or office space should be examined. 2. Residential development may be multi -family units with a building height not to exceed 6 stories. 3. Commercial development should focus on retail and service businesses. Specialty shops and convenience commercial are to be encouraged. An anchor user should be encouraged to attract a broad customer base to the redevelopment area. 4. Office space should be designed for professional office users. 5. A portion of the site should be dedicated to a centrally located public open space, sufficient for gatherings and community activities. This should serve as a major focal point in the Downtown Area. 6. A cultural arts facility should be encouraged. C. Development Character 1. New construction should be compatible with the existing character in the downtown area. 2. Taller buildings should be located in such fashion as to lessen the impact to surrounding residential uses. D. Design Guidelines 1. Provide attractive, well landscaped frontages along all public streets, and adequate screening and buffering around parking and loading areas. 2. An integrated site plan should reflect no physical barriers between land uses. 3. Brick construction is preferred for all buildings. No exposed block walls should be allowed on any building elevation. 4. The redevelopment area should include a unified streetscape elements, including lighting, benches, graphics and brick paver sidewalks. Signage should blend with the development and complement its architectural character. E. Parldng 1. Sufficient off-street parking should be provided to meet the demand of the proposed land uses. 2. Parking should be located in areas easily accessible from adjoining streets. 3. Parking should be assembled into unified lots or structures, with adequate provisions for short-term customer parking and long-term employee parking. 4. Underground parking for residential units is encouraged. 5. The use of shared parking utilizing off-peak operating hours should be encouraged. F. Pedestrian Movement 1. Pedestrian access and movement through the site should be an important part of the plan. Public and private pedestrian sidewalks should be provided, and conflicts with automobile traffic should be minimized on-site. 2. Provide direct pedestrian connections from the redevelopment area to adjoining areas to encourage pedestrian movement to or from other adjacent commercial areas. G. Village Participation 1. The Village owns the 2.26 acre site on Pine Street. The municipality should consider flexible and innovative methods to convey this parcel to the selected developer. 2. The municipality should consider economic incentives proposed by the selected developer. 3. The Village should consider appropriate use of condemnation and land clearance of properties in order to implement redevelopment. 4. Vacation of existing public streets and alleys may be considered for the appropriate plan. 5. The Village may assemble property to the extent feasible. -3- TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Existing Tax Increment Finance District Adopted 1985 Amended 1988 M ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE DESIGNATING THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, has heretofore in ordinance No. adopted and approved the Triangle Redevelopment Project Eligibility Report and Triangle Redevelopment Project, and it is now necessary and desirable to designate the area referred to in said Eligibility Report and Redevelopment project as the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The area legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof is hereby designated as the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area, pursuant to the ordinances and home rule powers of the Village of Mount Prospect. The street and general description of the boundaries of the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area are set forth in Exhibit B and shown on a Location Map, Exhibit C, both of which are attached hereto and made a part hereof. SECTION 2: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. PASSED the following roll call vote this day of 199 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSENT FROM COMMENT AND VOTE: APPROVED this ATTEST: day of T-99 Village Clerk lmpl�dl IFAWIA RAP Village President EXHIBIT A Lot 1 in Wille's Reconsolidation Plat; Lots 1, 19, 18 and the north 23.72' of Lot 17 in Busse & Wille's Resubdivision in Mt. Prospect; Lot A in Corporate Subdivision #8 Village of Mt. Prospect; Lot A in Corporate Subdivision #3 of Village of Mt. Prospect; all of Desiderata Subdivision and the north 150' of the west 157' of Lot 1 in Busse & Wille's Resubdivision in Mt. Prospect, all in the west 1/2 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 41, Range 11 east of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois; and; Lot 1 in Novakovic's Resubdivision; Lot 1 in John Flowers' Resubdivision; and Lot 1 in Winkelman's Resubdivision; all in the east 1/2 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 41, Range 11 east of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois. Permanent Index Numbers: 08-12-101-018 08-12-100-012 08-12-101-004 08-12-100-013 08-12-101-001 08-12-100-007 08-12-101-015 08-12-100-008 08-12-101-017 08-11-204-015 08-12-100-014 08-11-204-016 08-11-204-017 TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA STREET AND GENERAL BOUNDARY DESCRIPTION The Triangle Redevelopment Project Area is bounded generally on the north by Central Road; on the south/southwest/west by Northwest Highway; and on the east by Wille Street, all in Mount Prospect, Illinois. EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT C TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT Existing Tax Increment Finance District Adopted 1985 Amended 1988 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE FOR THE TRIANGLE REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT. WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois has heretofore adopted ordinance No. that approved the Triangle Development Project, and Ordinance No. designating the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area, both of which are incorporated herein in their entirety; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect has determined that the Triangle Redevelopment Project, which was the subject matter of a public hearing on December 17, 1991, is in the best interests of the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect and is a public purpose; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is empowered, pursuant to Ordinance No. and its home rule powers to acquire by purchase, donation, lease or eminent domain, real property within the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the aforementioned Triangle Redevelopment Project would attract to the Village of Mount Prospect additional commercial ventures, increase business for commercial ventures currently established within the Village, strengthen the property and non -property tax and income bases in the Village and would provide jobs for Village residents; and WHEREAS, pursuant to its home rule powers, the Village of Mount Prospect has previously adopted Ordinance No. , empowering the Village's exercise of the power of eminent domain for the public purpose of redevelopment within a Redevelopment Project Area, as defined in said Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the exercise of its powers of eminent domain required in order to condemn or purchase real property for the Triangle Redevelopment Project is contained in Ordinance No. -, the Illinois Constitution, the Illinois Revised Statutes and the home rule ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the acquisition of property for the Triangle Redevelopment Project requires the exercise of powers and performance of functions pertaining to the government and affairs of the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: That it is hereby determined that the Triangle Redevelopment Project, previously adopted, be established, maintained, controlled, managed and operated within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect and within the Triangle Redevelopment Project Area, as described in ordinance No. and that said Triangle Redevelopment Project be -occupied, improved, used and developed in a manner necessary and convenient for public use. SECTION 2: That under the authority vested in the corporate authorities of the village of Mount Prospect through the Illinois Constitution, the Statutes of the State of Illinois and the home rule powers and ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is hereby determined that, pursuant to the Triangle Redevelopment MAKA 0 Project, it is necessary and desirable that the Village shall acquire title to and possession of the real property legally described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof (hereinafter, the "Subject Property"), which property is within the foregoing Triangle Redevelopment Project Area and is necessary, required and needed to achieve the objectives of the foregoing Triangle Redevelopment Project and which property lies wholly within the limits of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION 3: That the Law Offices of Barry A. Springer be and it is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate personally or through its representatives for and on behalf of said Village, with the owner or owners of the Subject Property for the purchase thereof by the Village, and all negotiations undertaken therefor and thusfar by said law firm are hereby ratified and approved in their entirety. SECTION 4: That in the event that said law firm or its agents is unable to agree with the owners of the Subject Property as to the compensation to be paid therefor, then fee simple title to and possession of the Subject Property shall be acquired by the Village of Mount Prospect by condemnation and the Law Offices of Barry A. Springer, as attorney for the Village, is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to institute proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction to acquire fee simple title to -and possession of the Subject Property for the Village in accordance of the eminent domain laws of the State of Illinois and the ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION 5: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. PASSED the following roll call vote this day of 199 AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: ABSENT FROM COMMENT AND VOTE: APPROVED this day of 199 Village President ATTEST: Vi Ilage "Cerk LOT 1 IN WILLE'S RECONSOLIDATION PLAT OF LOTS I AND 2 IN WILLE'S CONSOLIDATED PLAT OF LOTS 2 TO 12, BOTH INCLUSIVE, IN BLOCK 2 IN BUSSE AND WILLE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MOS.'NT PROSPECT, A SUBDIVISION IN THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE I1 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF COOK COUN'T'Y, ILLINOIS ON NOVEMBER 9, 19"79 AS DOCUMENT NO. LR3130193 (commonly known as 100-108 W. Northwest Highway, Mount Prospect, IL) EXHIBIT A ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, The Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect has determined that, pursuant to its home rule powers relative to the public purpose of redevelopment, as set forth in Ordinance No. , it is in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect that the Village enter into a certain Real Estate Purchase Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: The Village President and Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Real Estate Purchase Agreement which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, the Board of Trustees having determined, pursuant to its home rule powers relative to the public purpose of redevelopment set forth in Ordinance No. , that said Agreement is in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION 2: The acts of the President, Trustees, Village Clerk, officers, attorneys and employees of the Village of Mount Prospect, necessary to implement, carry out and/or give effect to the terms of the Real Estate Purchase Agreement, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit A, are hereby authorized. SECTION 3: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President 1992. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSP4CT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager W& FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: December 13, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-76-V-91, John & Marie Traficanto LOCATION: 418 South Emerson Street The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variation application filed by John & Marie Traficanto. The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a side yard setback of 17 to accommodate an existing deck. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of December 12, 1991. At the meeting, Marie Traficanto presented testimony in support of the request. She explained that they entrusted their contractor with the task of obtaining the permit and were not aware that the permit was never issued until after the deck was constructed. She also stated that they are willing to work with staff on creating an acceptable drainage swale along the north property line. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the variation would allow the deck to remain as constructed, 17 from the side property line. She noted that the neighbor has a 5' evergreen hedge which effectively screens the deck from the neighbor. She also noted that the deck is low to the ground, which further minimized its impact. She stated that a drainage swale must be created along the north side yard as requested by Engineerin& The ZBA generally discussed the request, noting the circumstances and that the deck is attractive and adequately screened from the neighbor. Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a variation to allow a 17 side yard to accommodate an existing deck. JF:c1 ONES, P'1 ts"' I a t of Survey OF PROPERTY DESCRIBED AS: Lot 10 in Block I in Prospect'Highlands Subdivision, of that Westerly 379.4 feetof the East Half of the North 60 rods of the Southwest Quarter of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois. D WEE ENGINEZRIM (312)428-2929 D mde*, Illinois Seal*: —LLZ Ordered: Leonard Petrucelli Owner: Page: -4L�- Job- -7Luad— 2$ 7 31 (, 1Z A po,.r Dx-r V /5(.o 438 31x S HA -BON EE TR Z, Z 0 V) Ce lij 2 LLI STATE OF ILLINOIS COUM Of KANE ss I hereby certify th&t I hove surveyed th4 ` . I .... above doseribed Proper OF ty and that the snaamnsd correctly represents said surve i . PHILIP K WHITEHOUSE No 35 im Illinois Land S=v*yor #35-1596 %. BUNKE Vd Z +w A*O 44k, A%c a ',AO cn MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 76-V-91 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: December 12, 1991 John and Marie Traficanto 418 South Emerson Street November 26, 1991 Variation to Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a side yard setback of 1.7 ft. for an existing deck. Code requires a 4.4 ft. side setback. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Dennis Saviano Michaele Skowron ABSENT: None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a sideyard setback of 1.7 ft. for an existing deck. Code requires a 4.4 ft. sideyard. The petitioner, Marie Traficanto, 418 South Emerson Street, presented her case stating that they hired a contractor to build a deck and trusted him to get the permit. After the deck was built, they found out that the contractor never obtained the permit. In addition, the contractor did not build the deck according to the plan approved during the permit review by staff. They are seeking the variation to keep the deck as constructed rather than cut it back to meet the sideyard requirement. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, explained that the contractor submitted plans for the deck and applied for a permit. He was. told that the deck must be set back 4.4 ft. from the lot line. Subsequently, the plan was modified and the permit approved by staff. However, the contractor never picked up the permit and built the deck according to his original plan. Ms. Farnham noted that a 5 ft. evergreen hedge along the property line screens the deck from the neighbor. She also indicated that Engineering requests that a drainage swale be maintained in the 1.7 ft. sideyard to accommodate the natural drainage pattern. Ms. Farnham discussed this with the applicant who indicated that they hope to put paver blocks in this area. Ms. Farnham netted that the lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed and that the pavers could be laid to create a Swale. ZBA-76-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Cassidy questioned the flooding potential on the neighbor's property, if this area were paved. Ms. Farnham stated that the swale could be constructed out of pavers without increasing ran -off to the neighbor's lot. Chairman Basnik asked the petitioner if they were willing to construct the swale. Mrs. Traficanto stated that they will work with Village staff to create a swale as necessary. Mrs. Skowron asked if staffs suggestion of planting grass in the 1.7 ft. sideyard wouldn't create a maintenance problem since it is too narrow for a lawn mower. Ms. Farnham stated that she believes pavers were a good idea in this location. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioner's request for a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 1.7 ft. sideyard subject to the petitioner working with staff on creating a drainage swale in the sideyard. Mr. Cassidy moved; seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 7-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Julie Farnham, Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC17 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: SW x 1561 (7,800 sq. ft.) % COVERAGE: 32% F.&L R. : N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Page I Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals The applicant is request;ng a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a side yard setback of 1.7 ft. for an existing deck. Code requires a 4.4 ft. side setback. Summary of application: The applicants hired a contractor to construct a deck and entrusted him with the responsibility of obtaining the necessary permits. The contractor applied for a permit, and was told that the deck must be set back to line up with the north wall of the garage. Subsequently, the plan was modified to allow a 5 ft. side setback and the permit application was approved. However, the contractor never picked up the permit, but proceeded to construct the deck according to the original plan. Because the permit was never issued, no inspections were scheduled and the error was not detected by the applicant until after the deck was constructed. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact The deck was built in line with a sidewalk along the side of the garage. An evergreen hedge approximately 5 ft. tall exists along the neighbor's property line. The hedge "tends the length of the deck thereby screening it from the neighbors. The neighbors house does have some windows facing the deck, but the hedge effectively screens from view the portion of the deck that encroaches into the sideyard. Staffs primary concern is how this narrow space will be maintained. It should be planted so it doesn't become a muddy swale. Staff notes that lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.' R11-MARA W,• Engineering and Inspection Services note that fill has been placed between the deck and the hedge which alters the natural drainage pattern. A Swale should be established to direct drainage to the rear yard. In addition, a building permit must be obtained after -the -fact for the deck. No other concerns were expressed by other Village staff. Staff recommends approval of this request noting that the portion of the deck that encroaches into the sideyard is relatively low to the ground and is adequately screened from the neighbor by a 5 ft. tall evergreen hedge. Staff does request that the Swale between the deck and the hedge be planted with grass or other suitable ground cover to eliminate erosion and muddy conditions. Um am, 0,� Jw- lavid A Clem'e-ntsDirecto VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER �� FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 13, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-77-SU-91, WAL-MART STORES, INC. LOCATION: 930 EAST MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a Special Use Permit application filed by Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow a 5'-10r diameter satellite antenna on the roof of the new Wal-Mart Store in Mount Prospect Plaza. Satellite antennas with diameters larger than 40' are only permitted as a special use. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of December 12, 1991. At the meeting Mark Courtney, Architect for Wal-Mart, presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Courtney explained that the Wal-Mart utilizes satellite antennas for their system of nationwide monitoring of merchandise and for security and fire alarm purposes. He noted that the antenna should not interfere with other television reception in the area. He also stated that Wal-Mart would prefer not to retrofit a screening device on the roof as it would require puncturing the roof structure which could cause leakage problems. He further stated that the screening device may be more noticeable than the antenna itself. However, if necessary, screening would be provided. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the 5'-10" antenna has been installed on the roof and noted that this request is very similar to one granted for Walgreen's in Mount Prospect Plaza a few months ago. She noted that the antenna complies with most of the special use standards listed in the ordinance. However, it should be screened on the north side. She suggested that a screening box similar to what Walgreen's proposed would provide adequate screening. Two residents expressed some concerns about potential interference with television reception but stated that they had not experienced any problems. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and the screening requirements. Several members stated that the screening requirements are clearly established in the ordinance and since others have had to abide by them, Wal-Mart should too. It was also noted that there are several satellite antennas in the area which have not created any apparent problems with local television reception. John Fulton Dixon December 16, 1991 Page 2 Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a Special Use Permit to allow a 5% 10" diameter satellite antenna on the roof of Wal-Mart conditioned on: Screening the antenna per ordinance requirements and staff approval. DMC:hg Satellite Dish Antenna PES2-A90 Zm GROUND II TIE -WRAP CABLE TO FEED SUPPORT ARM ALLOW LOOP IN CABLE TO I AV0I0 STRAIN ON CONNECTOR ALLOW ADEQUATE SLACK FOR El r-VAMdN ANO AZMUT�j CHANGES TD I Figure 4. Prodefin I SM Quick Repoint Antenna Cable Routing LL %A TIE.WRAP POINT 40 LEVEL WITH ANTENNA LOWEST POINT WHEN ANTENNA IS VERTICAL - PES2-A90 Zm GROUND II TIE -WRAP CABLE TO FEED SUPPORT ARM ALLOW LOOP IN CABLE TO I AV0I0 STRAIN ON CONNECTOR ALLOW ADEQUATE SLACK FOR El r-VAMdN ANO AZMUT�j CHANGES TD I Figure 4. Prodefin I SM Quick Repoint Antenna Cable Routing It ly fd 1. It T1 i�o'NKM MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 77 -SU -91 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Hearing Date: December 12, 1991 Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. 930 East Mount Prospect Plaza November 26, 1991 Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to install a 5'-10"diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Dennis Saviano Michaele Skowron None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane Cliff Wesa, 109 North Louis Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to install a 5'-19' diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna at Wal-Mart in Mount Prospect Plaza. Mark Courtney, B.S.W. Architects, Tulsa, Oklahoma, representing Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. presented his case stating that during the permitting process for building construction, Wal- Mart inadvertently failed to get a separate permit for the satellite antenna which the Village requires. He stated that all Wal-Mart Stores utilize satellite antennas for monitoring merchandise, security and fire alarm systems. The special use permit is requested to allow the antenna to remain as installed. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that a 5'-10" diameter satellite antenna was installed on the roof of the new Wal-Mart Store and a Special Use Permit is required because it is larger than 40' in diameter. She stated that this request is very similar to one recently reviewed and approved for Walgreens in Mount Prospect Plaza. She explained that this antenna meets all of the Special Use standards listed in the Ordinance for roof -mounted satellite antennas except with regard to screening. She noted that the building parapet walls screen the antenna from three sides, but the antenna is visible from the adjacent property to the north (Thunderbird Lanes). Staff requests that the ZBA-77-SU-91 December 12, 1991 Page 2 of 3 antenna be screened to comply with the Ordinance requirements. Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane stated that he wanted to go on record to express concern about the storage of many bales of cardboard boxes behind Wal-Mart. He stated that this is a. fire hazard and is not in keeping with the strong values and ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect. He stated that he spoke with the Store Manager in this regard. He also contacted the Village Manager and Fire Chief Cavello. Chairman Basnik stated that the Zoning Board appreciates his concern but has no jurisdiction over such matters. Cliff Wesa, 109 North Louis asked why so many satellite antennas are allowed for businesses but not for residents. Julie Farnham explained that the regulations on satellite antennas are the same in all zoning districts. Antennas under 40" in diameter are permitted, but any larger antenna would only be permitted as a Special Use which would require the public hearing process. Mr. Wesa also expressed concern about the impact on TV transmission in the area. Mr. Basnik noted that this antenna is currently operating in addition to others in the area. He asked if Mr. Wesa has experienced any problems to date. If he hasn't had problems yet he shouldn't in the future. Mr. Wesa sated that he has not had problems. Mr. Courtney responded to staffs recommendation for screening stating that the dish is relatively small and that a screening box as suggested by staff might be more visually obtrusive. He also stated that it would be necessary to penetrate the roof to construct the screening device. This could lead to problems with roof leaks. Mr. Basnik stated that he was inclined to agree that the screening device might be more visible than the antenna itself. Mr. Lannon stated that Walgreens was required to screen their antenna and so should Wal- Mart. The Ordinance is very clear on screening requirements and these should be adhered to for all applicants. Mr. Saviano asked how many stores with satellite antennas Wal-Mart has, and whether they are screened, and if there have been problems reported with regard to interference with TV transmission. Mr. Courtney stated that there are about 1,700 stores nationwide and he is not aware of any interference problems. He stated that some stores have screened their satellite antennas but usually with the building parapet walls. ZBA-77-SU-91 December 12, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Mr. Lannon noted that most of the stores are in rural locations and may not be subject to screening requirements. Only recently has Wal-Mart begun to move into suburban locations where appearance is more important. Mr. Cassidy stated that the specifics on frequency are not the main concern of the Zoning Board, but appearance is. He believes the antenna should be screened for aesthetic and consistency reasons. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioner's request for a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to allow a 5'-10" roof -mounted satellite antenna at Wal- Mart in Mount Prospect Plaza subject to screening per staff approval. Mrs. Skowron moved, Mr. Pratt seconded. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 7-0 This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Julie Farnham, Recording Secretary YIN v/N V/N I813jaurmo0 ssaucsng £•g : ?I'V'3 'af)vHaAOZ) oa Mis ZO'i :ONIINOZ 'NiOLIAM)Sda AL1IUOU �S rMEMO xu ff�- �L3 L :dVIW NiOLLV301 VMd IDUS01Id ,LNIa0W ISVd 0£6 :ss3maaV •JNtI`sgNO,LS ,LIPV -IVM :IK Vai'IddV i6-RS-LL-VgZ VONT 3SV3 1661 `Z W39W333a .aLVa 113KNd d `I'MiVHNINd III -Of :WO H3 NtVIrM WIVHa `NINiSVg 'IID S'MddV 30 a1PVO9 DNiINIOZ J133dS01Id INIfLOW :OZ slounll `Iaadsoad IunoW .I.N3puxvd3a wwoz aNv gNiNNv7d ;I JUSOHd IMIOW JO 39VTIIA. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesing a Special Use Permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to install a 5'- 10" diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna. Summary of application: The applicant installed a 5'-10" diameter satellite antenna on the roof of the new Wal-Mart Store in Mount Prospect Plaza. A separate permit was never obtained for the antenna and a special use permit is requested to allow the antenna to remain as installed. The applicant states that the satellite antenna is essential for store operation, communication, security and fire safety. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Wal-Mart was recently constructed in the Phase II area of Mount Prospect Plaza. Staff notes that a similar sized roof -mounted antenna was recently approved for Walgreens. While most of the surrounding properties are commercial, Centennial Apartments, a high-rise senior apartment complex abuts the northeast corner of the Wal-Mart property. Staffs primary concern with this request is the view of the satellite antenna by residents of upper floor apartments. The proposed satellite antenna meets most of the standards for non -ground mounted antennas as follows: 1. The antenna is located on the roof above the Wal-Mart Store to which it is an accessory. 2. The proposed 5'-10" diameter antenna is less than 1/3 the height of the building (22 building height X 33% = 7.26). 3. The overall height including the antenna and the building will be 29 ft. Code allows a maximum building height of 30 ft. 4. The antenna will be at least 20 ft. from all property lines. 5. The antenna and screening will be in scale with the building. The applicant states that the antenna will be screened from pedestrian view by parapet walls on three sides of the building. Staff notes that the antenna is visible from the parking lot of Thunderbird Lanes. According to the special use standards, the antenna must be screened from view from adjacent properties at grade level. Staff.` requests that screening be provided on all sides of the antenna to comply with this standard. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 QMER VILLAU STAEUCOMMENTS No objections were expressed by other Village staff. SLpflJAff=COMMENQATIQN This request is very similar to one recently approved for Walgreens in Mount Prospect Plaza. Staff recommends approval of the request noting that the standards for a roof - mounted antenna have been met except screening. As such, staff recommends that approval be conditioned on providing screening around the satellite antenna. JF:hg Approved: h M. cblnovll�- 10. David M. Clements, Director VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1991. SUBJECT: ZBA-79.V.91, RAY NAEGELE LOCATION: 2016 EAST EUCLID The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variation applicaiton filed by Ray Naegele. The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking at 2016 East Euclid Avenue: 1. Section 14.2102.13 to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. Code requires 10 ft. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line. Code requires 20 ft. 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front and side lot lines. Code requires 30 ft. and 10 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line•Code requires 20 ft. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than 75% as allowed by Code. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 12, 1991. At the meeting, Cary Chickerneo, Attorney for the applicant, presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Chickerneo explained that this is a very difficult site to develop due to it small size and shape. Variations are needed to create an economically viable development. He stated that in order to attract a video franchise they needed to provide about 5,000 square feet of space. He further described the specific variations proposed. Julie Farnham, Planner, agreed that this is a difficult site to develop and stated that staff believes the proposed single use retail store is one of the best proposals staff has seen for this site. She explained that staff has some concerns about substantially reducing the required yards, particularly adjacent to residential property. While yard variations are necessary to develop this site, the impact on adjacent residential property should be minimized. She presented a modified plan staff developed that would create a 5 ft. building setback on the east, 20 ft. rear setback to the north and provide 20 parking spaces as required by Code. She explained that the major drawback was that the building size would be reduced to approximately 4,080 square feet. Also presenting testimony in support of the request were, Warren Kostak, Architect for the applicant, and Ray Naegele, applicant and property owner. Mr. Kostak provided John Fulton Dixon Page 2 December 16, 1991 information relative to the design and appearance of the building. Mr. Naegele stated that he intends to use the space for a video store. He also has concerns about the impact on the residential, and believes the proposed use and site plan are sensitive to the surroundings. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request and its potential impact on surrounding residents. Members concurred that this is one of the best plans for this site, noting that the site constraints presented a hardship for development. Concerns were expressed about the larger variations requested and discussion ensued about potential areas of compromise between the applicants and staffs recommended plan. Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and parking at 2016 East Euclid Avenue.: 1. Section 14.2102.B to allow a 5 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 15 ft. building setback from the rear property line. 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front (south) and side (east) lot lines, and 10 ft. from the side (west) lot. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow a maximum of 78%. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property line as shown on the submitted site plan. 2. Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings. 3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground. 4. Any security lighting which faces residential property consist of cut-off fixtures (down - lighting). 5. No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building. 6. Continuous hedge to be planted along the north property line to provide solid screening adjacent to residential property. JF:hg Ago N {OLID #ooe f{Rc{ R-1 DI TCT II -I DI\TRICT x -. #Na rN9a SITE ALAN EUCLID AVENUE fPt1NT EI EVATION "'IP iAiY a 0 i�f +ret Ti wti �.lc it hp {xn 1"0 oN{ \TORY \uxalR{ f\'f OI\TliltTl SUMMARY OF ZONING VARIANCES IT#Y { {{CtiON #Y GOOi #{O4M 9OR{AR Y\RD If.21\f.G. 2D .Y OM#KIND Kt\ACN ti.]f02.{ 1.IW LUM # 1MlY O \IO! YAAo PAAMIMO 1f.21pf.# 2#PRO. 10 REfiDlNTIAL A— TARD NID.aiMD 11.9fp2.i f6 lUILDIN# a O MONRTY 1 GENERAL ZONING DATA R{Y cow RlomRao \{cyl" {Y COW LOT SUIT IUR ?LOOP ANSA RATIO WR MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 79-V-91 Hearing Date: December 12, 1991 PETITIONER: Ray Naegele SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2016 East Euclid PUBLICATION DATE: November 26, 1991 REQUEST: The following variations are requested to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking: 1) Section 14.2102.11 to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line instead of the required 10 ft.; 2) Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line instead of the required 20 ft.; 3) Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front lot line - Code requires 30 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line - Code requires 20 ft.; 4) Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than the permitted 75%. ZBA MIEM13ERS PRESENT: ABSENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter I.Amon Richard Pratt Dennis Saviano Michaele Skowron, None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: David Schien 512 NaWaTa Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking: Section 14.2102.B to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. Code requires 10 feet. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line. Code requires 20 feet. ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 2 of 5 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front lot line - Code requires 30 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line - Code requires 20 ft.; 4. Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than 75% as allowed by Code. Cary Chickerneo, 350 West Kensington Road, Attorney for the petitioner, indicated that he would be presenting the case for his client but would like to swear -in all witnesses beforehand. Chairman Basnik proceeded to swear -in Warren Kostak, 55 East Euclid Avenue, Architect and Ray Naegele, 2016 East Euclid, the petitioner. Mr. Chickerneo proceeded to explain the proposal. He stated that the petitioner is proposing to construct 4,895 sq. ft. retail store and parking to be used for a video store. He indicated that this is a challenging site to develop because of its small size and long, narrow shape. The proposal is attempting to create an economically viable development and be sensitive to the surroundings. The petitioner believes that a single use will be more sensitive to the surrounding residents. However, to make a video store economically viable to attract a major franchise, a minimum store size of around 5,000 sq. ft. is necessary. He indicated that the typical video store is between 6,000-6,500 square feet. Mr. Chickerneo continued to explain the specific variations requested. With regard to the zero foot building setback from the east property line, he stated that they believed that this was the best side to maximize encroachment as it abuts commercial property. He noted that footings could be constructed that wouldn't extend beyond the lot line. He also noted that there are utility and drainage easements on three of the four sides of this lot which could be considered a hardship. He stated that the proposed 10 ft. rear setback is the same as the adjacent gas station. He noted that the building will only be 14 ft. tall and will be brick on all facades. He stated that the petitioner is willing to increase landscaping along the rear if necessary. Regarding the parking lot setback variations, he stated that the zero foot along the east is something staff suggested to encourage flow-through traffic to the gas station site. The 10 ft. setback proposed on the west side would be screened with landscaping and a 6 ft. solid wood fence. In addition, he presented a petition signed by the adjacent property owner and two other neighbors stating that they did not object to the proposal He further stated that the lot coverage variation was relatively minor considering the site constraints. ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 3 of 5 With regard to the zero foot building setback from the east property line, staff's primary concerns are the impact on future redevelopment of the neighboring gas station site and constructing a permanent structure on top of an easement. Allowing a zero foot building setback could impose a hardship on the redevelopment of the adjacent site due to building separation requirements. The easement would have to be vacated to allow construction of a permanent structure. Staff would recommend maintaining the 5 ft. setback instead. Ms. Farnham suggested making the building longer by expanding to the west, eliminating four proposed parking spaces. She noted that there would still be 20 parking spaces which meets Code. She stated that staff cannot support such a drastic reduction of the rear yard adjacent to residential property. She also suggested additional landscaping along the rear property line to ensure continuous screening. With regard to the parking lot setbacks, Ms. Farnham stated that staff believes allowing flow-through driveway access to the gas station site makes sense as both are very small lots, and could share access off Euclid. She suggested that the property owners may want to set up a cross access agreement. She noted that the front setback tapers from 14 ft. to zero ft. at the driveway opening. Staff believes there is adequate space for landscape screening. She stated that the 10 ft. setback on the west will be amply landscaped and a fence will eliminate headlights shining into the adjacent residential property. She noted that the adjacent house is about 40 ft. away from the parking lot. She stated that the 784 lot coverage requested is a relatively minor variation from the 75% allowed given the constraints of this small lot. She noted that on-site detention will be required. Mr. Basnik questioned why staff was concerned about the 10 ft. setback to the rear but not to the west side. Julie Farnham stated that the rear yard abuts 3-4 residents whereas the west only abuts one and it is a sideyard with a garage in between the house and parking lot. Mrs. Skowron asked if the 10 ft. rear yard would be green space or if any would be used for parking. Is staffs concern primarily because 10 ft. is less than ideal? Julie Farnham stated that staff prefers to minimize the impact on residential property whenever possible. She noted that while a video store is not a very intense use, the use could change in the future. Mr. Saviano thanked Mr. Kostak for the site plan which clearly indicates the variations requested. He asked how staff felt about a 15 fL rear yard and how far away the homes are on the north. ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 4 of 5 Julie Farnham stated that they are at least 25 ft.; some may be 35-40 ft away. She also stated that staff realizes this is a difficult site to develop and that there might be justification for compromise, but would be looking for additional screening for compensation. Mr. Cassidy acknowledged that while 5,000 sq. ft. may be the ideal store size, this site can't accommodate the ideal. Mr. Chickerneo stated that 5,000 sq. ft. is not ideal but workable. It is the minimum size to make development economically feasible. He noted that to ensure business success, size is critical. He further noted that the property will be owner -operated and not leased. Mr. Lannon expressed concerns about a future change of use noting that B-4 zoning permits much more intensive uses. Mr. Chickerneo stated that he didn't foresee a quick change of ownership but agreed there are no guarantees. Mr. Cassidy also expressed concern about the fixture development along Euclid Avenue. Mrs. Skowron stated that it is not the Board's purpose to redesign the plan and suggested that a new plan which takes into consideration the concerns expressed, be brought back for review at the next meeting. She also stated concerns about the lack of buffering between the parking lot and the gas station site and potential traffic problems resulting from through - access between lots. She also stated that she is not overly concerned about reducing the rear setback if it will be green space, but would like to get closer to the ideal. Mr. Chickemeo stated that the proposed plan is flexible and that his client was open to suggestions. However, the site has many constraints, including easements on three sides, whereas the adjacent property only has easements on two sides. Mr. Lannon stated that the properties were owned by the same person who was involved with the subdivision and creation of the easements. This property was purchased with the existing easements in place. Some discussion ensued on how to modify the plan to increase the setbacks without significantly reducing the building size. David Schien, 512 NaWaTa expressed concerns about lot coverage variations in general, in light of the Village's flooding problems. Mr. Brettrager noted that the plan modifications suggested would reduce the lot coverage from the 78% requested -possibly to below the 75% maximum allowed. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to approve the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking at 2016 East Euclid Avenue: ZBA-79-V-91 December 12, 1991 Page 5 of 5 1. Section 14.2102.B to allow a 5 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 15 ft. building setback from the rear property line. 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front (south) and side (east) lot lines, and 10 ft. from the side (west) lot. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow a maximum of 78% lot coverage. Approval is subject to the following conditions: 1. Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property line as shown on the submitted site plan. 2. Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings. 3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground. 4. Any security lighting which faces residential property consist of cut-off fixtures (down -lighting). 5. No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building. 6. Continuous hedge to be planted along the north property line to provide solid screening adjacent to residential property. Mr. Cassidy moved; seconded by Mr. Saviano. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 7-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. �'�j�1� �� b Julie Farnham, Recording Secretary fm FROM: DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: ADDRESS: LOCATION MAP: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois MCUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN JULIE FARNHAM, PLANNER NOVEMBER 25, 1991 ZBA-79-V-91 RAY NAEGELE 2016 EAST EUCLID PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: B4 LOT SIZE: 18,165 sq.ft. % COVERAGE: 78% proposed F-kR.: N/A GH Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 REQUEST The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a retail store and associated parking: 1. Section 14.2102.13 to allow a 0 ft. building setback from the interior side lot line. Code requires 10 ft. 2. Section 14.2102.0 to allow a 10 ft. building setback from the rear property line. Code requires 20 ft. 3. Section 14.2102.E to allow the parking lot to come as close as 0 ft. to the front lot line - Code requires 30 ft. setback; and 10 ft. from the side lot line -Code requires 20 ft. 4. Section 14.2103 to allow 78% lot coverage rather than 75% as allowed by Code. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS -AND CONCERNS Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 4,895 sq. ft. retail store and required parking on this lot. As proposed, 24 parking spaces will be provided including two handicapped stalls. Code only requires 20 spaces and one handicapped stall. The building will be 14 ft. tall and have face brick on all sides. Because of the small size of the lot, several setback variations are requested for the building and parking lot. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The proposal is similar to one presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals earlier this year. One of the primary differences is that only one retail store will be created. The previous proposal included four stores (2 retail; 2 restaurants) within a similar -sized building. The primary concern with the previous proposal was granting a substantial parking variation without knowing specific tenant needs. The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the proposal with some modifications to create more parking. However, the Village Board ultimately denied the request, primarily due to uncertainty about parking demand for restaurant uses and concern about overbuilding this lot. Staff generally supported the previous request but had concerns about severely reducing the perimeter yards, particularly adjacent to residential property. Staff has the same concerns with this request. Following is a discussion of the individual variations requested: The applicant is requesting a (Y -W building setback adjacent to the service station. A 10 foot sideyard is required by Code. Staff has several concerns with such a drastic variation. First, building footings typically span at least 18" at their base. No part of a footing can be located off-site. To accommodate the footings, staff suggests providing a minimum setback of 2 feet. Second, staff notes that while the existing gas station building is 20'-0" from the proposed new lot line, it is likely that future Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 redevelopment of the gas station site would involve construction of a new building potentially with a shallower setback. The adjoining gas station site is a rather small comer lot, and any new construction would undoubtedly require variations. Allowing the proposed retail store to be built 0'-0" or 2'-0" from the lot line, could limit the feasibility of granting reasonable variations for redevelopment of the Mobil site, due to separation requirements between buildings. Staff believes a minimum of a 5 ft. setback should be maintained, so the proposed use will not have any adverse impact on redevelopment potential of the Mobil site. In addition, a 5 ft. utility easement was created along the east property line when this lot was resubdivided earlier this year. The Development Code prohibits placing permanent structures over an easement. A portion of the easement would have to be vacated to construct the building over it. To increase the setback, staff suggests shifting the building to the east. This would require elimination of parking spaces #9-12, however, 20 spaces would still remain which meets Code requirements. A 10 ft. rear setback is requested from the north property line for the 97.9 ft. length of the building. Code requires 20 feet. Staff cannot support such a significant (50%) reduction of the rear yard in this location. This property abuts 3 or 4 residential lots and a 10 ft. rear yard would not provide an adequate buffer between a commercial building and residential property. Staff notes that the building will only be 14 ft. tall and will have face brick on all sides. This will give the building a more residential scale and reduce the visual impact on the neighbors. The building will have to be reduced in size to provide a larger rear yard. It might be possible to make the building longer to minimize the amount of square footage lost. The applicant should address the feasibility of a smaller and/or reconfigured building. The residents abutting this lot all have solid wood fences along their rear property lines which will provide some screening. In addition, the applicant is proposing to plant some trees in the rear yard. Staff notes that this meets the requirements of the landscape ordinance for perimeter yard screening. However, the fences are on the neighbor's property and may not always provide a continuous screen. Therefore, staff suggests that a hedge be planted along the fence to ensure continuous screening in the future. A 0'-0" setback is requested along the proposed east property line. This would allow a direct connection between the proposed parking lot and the existing Mobil site. Staff encourages the coordinated development of these lots, since they are both relatively small. Staff also believes flow -dim circulation makes sense. The front setback along Euclid Avenue tapers from 14 ft. to zero ft. at the narrowest point. This results from the angled front lot line along Euclid Avenue. The zero ft. setback is adjacent to the driveway opening onto Euclid Avenue. The area immediately adjacent to the driveway must be free of any significant -landscaping in Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4 order to maintain unobstructed site lines. Staff feels adequate parking lot screening can be achieved along the frontage, but parking space #8 should be eliminated to provide additional landscape area between the sidewalk and the parking lot. The dumpster area could be converted to a parking space and the dumpster relocated near the building. A 10 ft. setback is requested adjacent to residential property to the west. A 20 foot setback is required by Code. The adjacent residential lot is oriented lengthwise along Euclid Avenue. As such, ample sideyard setbacks exist. The garage is 16' from the lot line. A shed exists between the garage and the lot line, providing some additional separation between the parking lot and the neighboring home. The home is approximately 40 ft. feet from the parking lot. While this is a significant variation, 10 ft. provides adequate space for landscape screening. Staff recognizes that this is a difficult site to develop. Providing conforming setback would require significantly reducing the size of the building. This could effect the development economics substantially, however, again the petitioner should fully explain the absolute hardship in this instance. Where parking lots abut residential property, landscape screening must be provided which is at least 6 feet in height. The site plan shows that a six foot solid wood fence will be installed along the west edge of the property. This will eliminate headlights shining into the adjacent residential property. Natural landscape materials proposed should also help improve the appearance. 4. Lot Coveraze, As proposed, the lot coverage is 77.7%, slightly over the maximum 75% allowed by Code. Given the constraints of this small lot, staff does not believe this is a significant variation and has no major objections to this request. However, sufficient on-site detention will be required. 0IS -THERVILLAGE STAEE COCOMIME Some concerns were expressed regarding the variations including: a. Detention must be provided on-site. Engineering notes that some water may be stored on the parking lot surface. A grading/site engineering plan is required. b. An access permit to Euclid Ave. must be obtained from the Cook County Hwy. Dept. C. Utilities are available, however, permits must be obtained from Citizens Utility Company and Cook County. d. Public improvements on Euclid Avenue Right -Of -Way, including a sidewalk, street lights, and parkway trees are required. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 5 SIMMARY5=0MMENDAIDON Despite some significant variations, this is one of the best proposals the planning staff has seen for this difficult site. A single retail tenant may be the most appropriate scale of development for this small commercial property. As proposed, the required amount of on- site parking can be provided. In addition, a small retial use will have less impact on adjacent residences than other uses permitted in the B4 District. Staff generally supports the proposal with the following exceptions: 1. A minimum 5' building setback should be provided from the proposed east property line. This will increase the distance between existing and potential future buildings, and will keep the drainage easement unobstructed as required by the Development Code. The applicant should justify the need for the variance, including the feasibility of reducing the size of the building or shifting it to the west to further increase the building side setback. 2. A conforming 20 ft. building setback should be provided from the north property line. This will buffer the encroachment of the 98 ft. long building from adjacent residents. While the proposed video store may not have a significant impact on the adjacent residents, the use could change in the future. 3. Eliminating parking space #8 to provide green area between the sidewalk and parking lot. This parking space could be replaced by converting the dumpster area to a parking stall and relocating the dumpster next to the building. In addition, staff suggests approval of the request should be conditioned on: Providing a 5 ft. building setback from the east property line or vacating the portion of the easement occupied by the proposed building. Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property line as shown on the submitted site plan. Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground. Any security lighting which faces residential property consist of cut-off fixtures (down - lighting)• No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building. Continuous hedge to be planted along the north property line to provide solid screening adjacent to residential property. Approved: uftpw+'�_ David M. Clements, Director CAF/ 1/3/92 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect and the Forest River Fire Protection District are desirous of entering into an Intergovernmental Agreement; and WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Agreement being the subject of this Resolution provides for the Village of Mount Prospect to provide for the fire protection, fire prevention and emergency medical services for that area known as the Forest River Fire Protection District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize, the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to attest her signature on the Intergovernmental Agreement between the Forest River Fire Protection District and the Village of Mount Prospect for the year 1992, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED.this _ day of ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor M 1992. FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HERETO and THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HERETO A G R E E M. E X WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, hereinafter referred to as "the Village", a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois and the Forest River Fire protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "District", a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, and WHEREAS, both the Village and the District are municipal corporations organized under the laws of the State of Illinois and as such have the power under State law to enter into agreements for providing fire protection and emergency services, and WHEREAS, the Village has agreed to provide such services to the District in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE VILLAGE AND THE DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS: 1 That for the period beginning January 1, 1991 to December 31, 1992, at 12:00 midnight said day, the Village shall furnish all fire fighting, fire protection, fire prevention and other emergency services, including emergency ambulance service, by such volunteer or paid on call and/or regular firemen available to the Village as the Fire Chief of the village shall determine, to the District for a certain area as shown and outlined in orange on Exhibit I attached hereto and made a part hereof. 2. That for the period of time during which this Agreement shall be in full force and effect, the District agrees to pay and the Village agrees to accept as full payment for said fire protection, fire prevention services and emergency services, that amount of monies received from tax receipts, replacement taxes, interest and other miscellaneous income collected during the period beginning January 1, 1991 and ending December 31, 1991, less all reasonable costs of running the said District, including, but not limited to, all administrative legal salaries and other expenses incurred. A. It is understood that the District shall levy taxes at the maximum rate authorized by statute without referendum, which shall not be less than .30% of the value of all taxable property within the District, and shall apply for and make all efforts to receive any available state and/or federal aid to fire protection districts as is now available or may be available during the term hereof. B. The District will retain the sum of $2,500.00 to handle any contingency or emergency matters that may develop during the year. All other monies shall be paid to the Village as follows: 2 on January 15, April 15, July 15 and October 15, 1991, all monies over and above the aforementioned $2,500.00 contingency fund shall be paid to the village. C. In addition, the District shall provide the Village with the following: (i) A copy of the Schedule of meetings of the District for the year 1991, to be furnished upon execution of this Agreement. (ii) A certified copy of the Tax Levy Ordinance adopted by the District for the fiscal year 1990-91, to be furnished upon execution of this Agreement. (iii) A copy of the District's audited financial statement for the period ending June 30, 1991, to be furnished within thirty (30) days after receipt by the District. (iv) A copy of the Minutes of each District meeting, to be furnished within thirty (30) days after each meeting, when requested by the Village. (v) The District shall provide the Village with copies of its quarterly receipts and disbursements, for informational purposes only, it being fully understood by the parties that the Village has no right of pre -approval regarding said disbursements. 3. That the Fire Chief of the Village shall have the sole and exclusive right, duty and responsibility to prescribe the manner and method of giving the alarm for fire and/or other emergencies occurring within the District's territory as outlined upon said Exhibit I. 4. That the Fire Chief of the Village or his authorized representative shall have the sole and exclusive authority and responsibility to direct and control any and all fire fighting, fire protection, fire prevention and other emergency operations 3 carried on at the scene of any alarm or emergency occurring within that territory of the District shown upon the said Exhibit I. 5. That all fire fighting, fire protection, fire prevention and other emergency procedures conducted under the provisions hereof shall be conducted in accordance with the regulations of the Mount Prospect Fire Department and the Ordinances of the Village. Furthermore, the District agrees that within thirty (30) days of the execution hereof, if permitted by State statute, it shall pass and approve Ordinances identical in form and content to the Ordinances of The Village which deal with fire fighting, fire protection, fire prevention, building construction as related to fire safety and other emergency procedures. certified copies of said Ordinance(s) shall be submitted to the Village within ten (10) days of their adoption by the District. 6. That all expenses and cost of maintaining equipment, apparatus, salaries, insurance premiums and any and all other items of expenses connected with the several services contemplated herein to be supplied by the Village to the District shall be borne by the Village. The only expense falling upon the District shall be in the form of the payments scheduled to be made hereinabove under Paragraph 2b. 7. That, within seven (7) days of receipt of notice of annexation by any municipality of land and territory within its district (as shown in orange upon the said Exhibit I hereto), the District shall forward a copy of said notice (with the legal 4 description contained therein) to the Village by addressing same to the attention of: Village Clerk 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be executed by their respective officers and have affixed hereunto their respective corporate seals, all having been authorized by the adoption of a suitable Resolution passed and approved by each of the respective parties hereto. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BY: I ATTEST:, Village Clerk FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT By: Pr sident ATTEST: plecretOry DATED this _ day of 1 19-. 9 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director DATE: December 10, 1991 A SUBJECT: Budget Amendment Ordinances The six-month budget report for the 1991/92 fiscal year identified a number of areas where amendments to the 91/92 budget are needed. A budget amendment is needed whenever expenditures are expected to exceed the total amount appropriated at the fund level. Additionally, amendments are usually made when priorities change within a fund and/or new projects have been authorized. The resulting amendments do not include every line - item that is expected to change, but only the more significant amounts. In keeping with this practice, a budget amendment ordinance has been prepared to reflect the changes discussed with the six-month budget report and other projects authorized by the Village Board. There are two budget ordinances attached: Budget Amendment No' :1 includes the changes discussed above, and Budget Amendment No. 2 provides for the separation of refuse disposal revenues and expenditures into a separate fund. The second amendment will enable the Village to track refuse disposal revenues and costs more accurately and to specifically relate these amounts to the services provided. The second change has been recommended by SWANCC as a means of satisfying future bond issue provisions. A summary of the changes by fund in Budget Amendment No. 1 follows: Revenues Expenditures Increases or Increases or Fund < Decreases > < DecreNes > General Fund $ 265,000 $ 468,850 Water & Sewer Fund 100,000 200,000 Risk Management Fund 150,150 175,000 Capital Impry Fund 2,580,000 1,350,000 Police & Fire Bldg Const < 265,000> 250,000 Police & Fire Bldg B & 1 - 2,015 Flood Control Const - 1991 1,500,000 1,090,000 Flood Control Const - 1992 2,775,000 - Flood Control B & I 4Q, _W 52,805 Total Changes 12,145,150 12,5 7f John Fulton Dixon Page 2 1991/92 Budget Amendment Ordinances The above changes will revise total budget revenues for 91/92, exclusive of interfund transfers, from $45,846,385 to $52,701,535. This amount includes an expected sale of $4.375 million in bonds prior to April 30, 1992. Total expenditures will increase from $43,422,375 to $46,721,045. The second amendment will not change overall totals but only shift $2,521,050 in revenues and $2,403,035 in expenditures from the General Fund to the Refuse Disposal Fund. DCJ/sm Enc VILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 1 November 30, 1991 Revenues Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budeet <Decrease> Budget General 1-000-00-4184 Multi -Family Refuse Fee $ $ 265,000 $ 265,000 All Other General Fund Revenues 18A20,82 18 X20.800 Amended General Fund Revenueslye 8 A20, 80 .2 218 , 385 n 8O0 Water Fund 41-000-00-4019 Taxes - Current $ 1,450,000 3,685,000 $< 125,000> 200,000 $ 1,325,000 3,885,000 41-000-00-4201 Water Sales 41-000-00-4205 Water & Sewer Taps 50.0 25., 75.000 Water Fund Changes $ 5,185,000 $ 100,000 $ 5,285,000 All Other Water Fund Revenues 954,200 954,200 Amended Water Fund Revenues ° k,1 9.x,200 $ 100.000 $ 6„239.200 Risk M na¢ement Fund 49-000-00-4176 General Fund Ghg - Medical $ 930,000 $ 136,400 $ 1,066,400 107.500 49-000-00-4177 Water Fund Chg - Medical 93.750 13.750 Risk Mgt. Fund Changes $ 1,023,750 $ 150,150 $ 1,173,900 All Other Risk Mgt. Fund Revenues 1,101.250 1,101,250 Amended Risk Mgt. Fund Revenues 8 2,1� $ 150. $ 2 275,150 Capital Improvement Fund 51-000-00-4242 Sale of Bonds $ - $1,350,000 40,000 $ 1,350,000 40,000 51-000-00-4113 Rental Income 51-000-00-4152 State Income Tax Surcharge - 865,000 865,000 51-000-00-4227 Trans - Police & Fire Const - 50,000 250,000 75.000 250,000 125.000 51-000-00-4267 Developer Donations Capital Impry Fund Changes $ 50,000 $2,580,000 $ 2,630,000 All Other Capital Impry Revenues 4 Amended Capital Impry Revenues y9, 493,75 $2,580,.(70p S 3.073'750 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 1 November 30, 1991 Revenues Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget < ec ease> Bud et Police & Fire BldgConst 52-000-00-4152 State Income Tax Surcharge $ 265,000 $< 265,000> $ - All Other Police & Fire Revenues 135,000 135,000 Amended Police & Fire Revenues 400,000 < 265,.,,000> $ 135,000 Flood Control Const Fund - 1991 58-000-00-4242 Sale of Bonds 1991A $ 1,400,000 $1,500,000 $ 2,900,000 All Other Flood Ctl Const Revenues 500,000 500.000 Amended Flood Control Const Revenues $ 1,900,00 21,50MOO 3,400,000 Flood Control Const Fund - 1992 59-000-00-4242 Sale of Bonds 1992A $ $2,77,5,000 $ 2,775,000 All Other Flood Ctl Const Revenues Amended Flood Control Const Revenues $ ,;, 2,775m000 $ 2,775 000 Flood Control $ & I Fund 67-000-00-4227 Trans - Flood Control $ 50,500 S 40.000 $ 90.500 Amended Flood Control B & I Fund 50.500 2 40,000 90,500 I vzLIAmm OF MOUNT naumnECT Summary of Budget Revenue Changes November »u. lonz ' ovagot Amendment No. l General ru^u Water Fund Risk Management Fund Capital Improvement Fund Police & rice uIug Const Fund Flood Control Const Fund 1991 Flood Control opoot Fund 1992 rlvvu cootzvI a & z Fund Total Revenue CbooQeo All Other Revenues Amended Revenue Totals Amended Revenue Totals lamo: Iutpzfuua Transfers Amended Totals - All Funds 3 ,885����� ���035 $45'945.885 $7.I45.150 $53.091.035 < -99500> L< 29-0 000> �< 389,500> jjLjj6 �5 S52.72L535 Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Decrease> Bud *18.120.800 $ 2*5.000 $18.30'800 6.139.200 100,000 6.239.200 2.125.000 150.150 2.175.150 493.750 2.580.000 3.073.750 400.000 < 265.000> 135.800 1.900'000 1.500.000 3.400.000 - 2.775`000 2.775.000 50,500 40,000 90L500 $29.229.250 $7.145'150 $36.374.400 16.716.635 � _l6.Z16,635i ,885����� ���035 $45'945.885 $7.I45.150 $53.091.035 < -99500> L< 29-0 000> �< 389,500> jjLjj6 �5 S52.72L535 vzoIAGnnrMOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment ' No. z November 30. 1991 Expenditures Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Dq,rrease> Budget General�� Village Manager's office I'021-01-6650 Medical Insurance $ I5.000 $ 2.200 $ 17.200 1-021-02'6015 Special Counsel 30.000 « zV.OVO> 20,000 1'021'02-6017 Prosecutor 70.000 e5.000 95.000 Communications Division 1-022'01-6650 Medical Insurance * 7.580 1,100 8,600 Finance Department 1'031'01-6650 Medical insurance $ 45.000 6.600 51.600 Village Clerk's office 1'032-01-6650 Medical Insurance $ 7.500 1,100 8.600 1-032-07'6699 Writing a Editing Newsletter 8,500 2,000 10.500 Inspection Services Department 1'037'02'6650 Medical Insurance $ 39.375 5.775 45.150 1'037-06'6650 Medical Iasvzance 28,125 4.125 32,250 Police Department 1'041'01-6650 Medical Insurance $ 37.500 5.500 43.000 1'041-01-60I1 Employment Testing 5.000 I7.000 22,000 I-041-02'5843 overtime 130.000 27.500 157.500 1-041-02'6650 Medical Insurance 247.500 36'300 203.800 I-041-03'6650 Medical zoa^raooe 7.500 1,100 8,600 1-041-04-6650 Medical Insurance oVo 45,000 6 .aon 51,600 I-041-08-6650 Medical Insurance 3.750 550 4.300 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 1 November 30, 1991 Expenditures Fire Department 1-042-01-6650 Medical Insurance 1-042-02-5843 Oertime - Hire Back 1-042-02-5844 Overtime - Call Back 1-042-02-6650 Medical Insurance 1-042-04-6650 Medical Insurance 1-042-06-6650 Medical Insurance Human Services Division 1-052-01-6650 Medical Insurance 1-052-01-8002 Senior Center Impry 1-052-01-5899 Salary Adjustments Planning & Zoning Department 1-062-01-6650 Medical Insurance Street Division 1-071-01-6650 Medical Insurance 1-071-10-5250 Maintenance Personnel Refuse Disposal Division 1-075-02-5081 Deputy P W Director 1-075-02-5250 Maintenance Personnel 1-075-02-6230 S/F Refuse Collection 1-075-02-6231 M/F Refuse Collection 1-075-02-6650 Medical Insurance 1-075-02-7025 Yard Bags/Stickers 1-075-02-5902 IMRF Pension Cost 1-075-02-5903 FICA Costs - Socl Security 1-075-02-5905 FICA Costs - Medicare 2 $ 22,500 $ 3,300 $ 25,800 - 3,250 3,250 6,000 6,000 $ 18,750 2,750 21,500 $ 116,250 17,050 133,300 20,770 < 7,365> 13,405 $ - $ 5,000 Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Decrease> Budget 397,500 100,000 497,500 $ 18,750 $ 2,750 $ 21,500 40,000 39,750 79,750 25,000 12,500 37,500 236,250 34,650 270,900 22,500 3,300 25,800 7,500 1,100 8,600 $ 22,500 $ 3,300 $ 25,800 - 3,250 3,250 6,000 6,000 $ 18,750 2,750 21,500 $ 116,250 17,050 133,300 20,770 < 7,365> 13,405 $ - $ 5,000 $ 5,000 5,000 5,000 1,198,500 60,000 1,258,500 397,500 100,000 497,500 3,750 550 4,300 12,500 19,450 31,950 4,325 4,325 2,500 2,500 540 540 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 1 November 30, 1991 Expenditures Community & Civic Groups 1-0,81-01-6624 75th Anniversary Comm Total General Fund Changes All Other General Fund Amended General Fund IMRF Fun 24-011-01-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 24-031-01-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 24-032-01-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 24-037-06-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 24-052-01-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 24-062-01-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 24-062-01-5903 FICA Costs - Socl Security 24-075-02-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 24-075-02-5903 FICA Costs Socl Security 24-075-02-5905 FICA Costs Medicare Total IMRF Fund Changes All Other IMRF Fund Amended IMRF Fund Water Fund 41-072-10-8724 Replace Water Mains 41-072-12-6701 Lake Water Purchase Total Water Fund Changes All Other Water Fund Amended Water Fund r] Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Degrease> Bud $ 9,100 $ 20,00 $ 29,109 $ 2,873,120 $ 468,850 $ 3,341,970 14,979,700 14979,700 217J52,820 $ 468, $18,321,670 $ 1,000 1,000 46,980 1,500 48,480 6,830 365 7,195 31,300 1,000 32,300 24,205 1,000 25,205 20,085 1,500 21,585 11,450 1,000 12,450 4,325 < 4,325> - 2,500 < 2,500> 540 :S. 540> 148,215 $ $ 148,215 5723,65 572,865 $ 721,080 $ $ 721,080 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 200,000 1_300,000 100 , 000 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 200,000 $ 1,600,000 4 9$2,430 4A52,489 $ 6,352,430 $ 200 .p0,f $ 6,552,430 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 1 November 30, 1991 Expenditures 4 Amended 91/92 Increase, 91/92 Budget <Decrease> Budget Risk Management Fund 49-035-01-6721 Workers' Comp Claims $ 225,000 $ 75,000 $ 300,000 49-035-01-6722 Medical Claims 1,150,000 100MO 1,250.000 Total Risk Mgt. Fund $ 1,375,000 $ 175,000 $ 1,550,000 All Other Risk Mgt. Fund 750,000, 750.000 .Amended Risk Mgt. Fund $ 2,125,00 175000 2,300,000 Capital Improvement Fud, 51-077-91-8050 Property Acquisition $ - $1,350,000 $ 1,350,000 All Other Capital Impry Fund 720J85 720.785 Amended Capital Impry Fund5 720.785 ]. 350 000, , n $ 2.070.785 Flood Coprrol Const, Fund 58-077-65-8001 Engineering Studies $ 221,150 $ 400,000 $ 621,150 58-077-65-8104 Clearwater Park Project - 650,000 650,000 58-077-65-9817 Trans - Flood Control B & I W500 40,000 90.500 Total Flood Control Const Fund $ 271,650 $1,090,000 $ 1,361,650 All Other Flood Control Const L600,000 _1.600.000 Amended Flood Control Const $ 1,871.650 $L090.000 fi$ 2.961.650 4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 1 November 30, 1991 Expenditures Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budeet <Decrease> Budget Police & Fire Bldg, Const Fund 52-077.85-9818 Trans - Capital Impry Fund $ - $ 250,000 $ 250,000 All Other Police & Fire Bldg. Const. Amended Police & Fire Bldg. Const. $ $ 250,000 250 000 Police & Fire Bldg. B & I Fund 64-091-02-9560 P & F Building Interest $ 140,000 $ 2,015 $ 142,015 All Other P & F Bldg. B & I 1,500 1,500 Amended P & F Bldg. B & I ^$7141,,500 $ 2.015 $ 143.515 Flood Control B & I Fund 67-091-02-9560 Flood Control Interest $ 49,000 $ 52,805 $ 101,805 All Other Flood Control B & I 1,500 - 1 500 Amended Flood Control B & I $50O 500 $ 52,805 $ 103,305 5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Summary of Budget Expenditure Changes November 30, 1991 Budget Amendment No. I Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget. <Decl:ease> Budeet General Fund $17,852,820 $ 468,850 $18,321,670 IMRF Fund 721,080 - 721,080 Water & Sewer Fund 6,352,430 200,000 6,552,430 Risk Management Fund 2,125,000 175,000 2,300,000 Capital Improvement Fund 720,785 1,350,000 2,070,785 Police & Fire Bldg. Const. Fund - 250,000 250,000 Flood Control Const. Fund 1,871,650 1,090,000 2,961,650 Police & Fire Bldg, B & I Fund 141,500 2,015 143,515 Flood Control B & I Fund 5Q,500 52,80. 103,205 Total Expenditure Changes $29,835,765 $3,588,670 $33,424,435 All Other Expenditures 13,686,110 13,686,110 Amended Expenditure Totals $43,521„875 $3,588,670 247jM545 Amended Expenditure Totals $43,521,875 $3,588,670 $47,110,545 Less: Interfund Transfers < 19_500> < 290,000> _:<�8 00> Amended Totals - All Funds ji2,� �23 $3,298,670 $46,721,045 6 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 2 December 1, 1991 Revenues Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budstet <Decr a e> Budget General Fund 1-000-00-4004 Taxes Garbage Current $ 813,300 $< 813,300> $ 1-000-00-4005 Taxes Garbage Prior 941,250 < 941,250> - 1-000-00-4164 Personal Property Repl Tax 130,500 < 130,500> 1-000-00-4184 Multi Family Refuse Charge 265,000 < 265,000> 1-000-00-4185 Sale of Refuse Stickers 200,000 < 200,000> - 1-000-00-4186 M/F Refuse Penalties 1-000-00-4187 Sale of Refuse Bags 125,000 < 125,000> - 1-000-00-4188 Sale of Recycling Bins 1,000 < 1,000> 1-000-00-4189 Recycling Income _ 45M0 <�> Total General Fund Changes $ 2,521,050 $<2,521,050> $ - All Other General Fund 15J64,750 15,864,750 Amended General Fund $1$,385.800 S<2,521 050> 115364.750 Refuse Disposal Fund 21-000-00-4004 Taxes - Garbage Current $ $ 813,300 $ 813,300 21-000-00-4005 Taxes - Garbage Prior - 941,250 941,250 21-000-00-4164 Personal Property Repl Tax 130,500 130,500 21-000-00-4181 Multi -Family Refund Chg 265,000 265,000 21-000-00-4183 M/F Refuse Penalties 200,000 200,000 21-000-00-4185 Sale of Refuse Stickers - 125,000 125,000 21-000-00-4187 Sale of Refuse Bags 1,000 1,000 21-000-00-4188 Sale of Recycling Bins - 45-,000 45,000 21-000-00-4189 Recycling Income" Total Refuse Disposal Charges $ - $ 2,521,050 $ 2,521,050 All Other Refuse Disposal Fund Amended Refuse Disposal Fund $ $ 2"521,050 $"2,521 RC1 VILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Summary of Budget Revenue Changes December 1, 1991 Budget Amendment No. 2 General Fund Refuse Disposal Fund Total Revenue Changes All Other Revenues Amended Revenue Totals Amended Revenue Totals Less: Interfund Transfers Amended Totals - All Funds 2 Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Decrease> Budget $18,385,800 $<2,521,050> $15,864,750 2,521050 2.521 050 $18,385,800 $ - $18,385,800 3434 7� 34,705,235 553,091„ 035 S 53 091,,035 $53,091,035 $ $53,031,035 < 389.500> < 389,500> $52 JOL 535 '..... �.�... $52 701 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 2 December 1, 1991 Expenditures Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Bud et <Decrease> Budget General Fund Refuse Disposal Division 1-075-02-5081 Deputy P W Director $ 5,000 $< 5,000> $ 1-075-02-5250 Maintenance Personnel 5,000 32,500 < < 5,000> 32,500> 1-075-02-5447 Refuse Coordinator 7,020 < 7,020> - 1-075-02-5452 Clerical Part Time 1-075-02-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 4,325 < < 4,325> 2,500> 1-075-02-5903 FICA Costs Socl Security 2,500 540 < 540> 1-075-02-5905 FICA Costs - Medicare 1-075-02-6217 Postage/Printing 6,000 1,258,500 < <1,258,500> 6,000> µ 1-075-02-6230 S/F Refuse Collection 497,500 < 497,500> 1-075-02-6231 M/F Refuse Collection 267,500 < 267,500> 1-075-02-6233 Recycling Collection 30,000 < 30,000> 1-075-02-6235 Brush Collection 113,000 < 113,000> 1-075-02-6237 Yard Bag Collection 1,500 < 1,500> m 1-075-02-6250 Equipment Rental 10,000 < 10,000> 1-075-02-6280 Yard Bag Commissions 65,900 < 65,900> 1-075-02-6290 Solid Waste Agency 4,300 < 4,300> 1-075-02-6650 Medical Insurance 1-075-02-7025 Yard Bags/Stickers 31,950 < 31,950> 60,000> 1-075-02-7032 Recycling Supplies/Res 60.00 < Total General Fund Changes $ 2,403,035 $<2,403,035> $ - All Other General Fund _.15,918,6 15,918,6,35 Amended General Fund 3� 21,670-<2„,403-,035> 15_;918" 635 Refuse Disposal Fund Solid Waste Disposal 21-075-02-5081 Deputy P W Director $ - - $ 5,000 5,000 $ 5,000 5,000 21-075-02-5250 Maintenance Personnel - 32,500 32,500 21-075-02-5447 Refuse Coordinator 7,020 7,020 21-075-02-5452 Clerical Part -Time 21-075-02-5902 IMRF Pension Costs 4,325 2,500 4,325 2,500 21-075-02-5903 FICA Costs - Socl Security 540 540 21-075-02-5905 FICA Costs - Medicare VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1991/92 Budget Amendment - No. 2 December 1, 1991 Expenditures Total Refuse Disposal Charges $ - $ 2.403.035 $ 2,,403,,035 summary of Budget Expenditure Changes December 1, 1991 Budget Amendment No. 2 General Fund Refuse Disposal Fund Total Expenditure Changes All Other Expenditures Amended Expenditure Totals Amended Expenditure Totals Less: Interfund Transfers Amended Totals - All Funds 2 Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Decrease> Budget $18,321,670 $<2,403,035> $15,918,635 2,403,035, 2,403.035 $18,321,670 $ - $18,321,670 28,788,875 28.788,875 47 110.545$ - 47 11.0.545 $47,110,545 $ - $47,110,545 < J89,500> < 389,500> $46 7� $46 7211 0 5 Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Decrease> Budget,,,, Refuse Disposal Fund - Continued 21-075-02-6217 Postage/Printing 6,000 6,000 21-075-02-6230 S/F Refuse Collection 1,258,500 1,258,500 21-075-02-6231 M/F Refuse Collection - 497,500 497,500 21-075-02-6233 Recycling Collection - 267,500 267,500 21-075-02-6235 Brush Collection 30,000 30,000 21-075-02-6237 Yard Bag Collection 113,000 113,000 21-075-02-6250 Equipment Rental - 1,500 1,500 21-075-02-6280 Yard Bag Commissions - 10,000 10,000 21-075-02-6290 Solid Waste Agency - 65,900 65,900 21-075-02-6650 Medical Insurance - 4,300 4,300 21-075-02-7025 Yard Bags/Stickers - 31,950 31,950 21-075-02-7032 Recycling Supplies 60,000 60.000 Total Refuse Disposal Charges $ - $ 2.403.035 $ 2,,403,,035 summary of Budget Expenditure Changes December 1, 1991 Budget Amendment No. 2 General Fund Refuse Disposal Fund Total Expenditure Changes All Other Expenditures Amended Expenditure Totals Amended Expenditure Totals Less: Interfund Transfers Amended Totals - All Funds 2 Amended 91/92 Increase 91/92 Budget <Decrease> Budget $18,321,670 $<2,403,035> $15,918,635 2,403,035, 2,403.035 $18,321,670 $ - $18,321,670 28,788,875 28.788,875 47 110.545$ - 47 11.0.545 $47,110,545 $ - $47,110,545 < J89,500> < 389,500> $46 7� $46 7211 0 5 ORDINANCE NO, AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 TO APRIL 30, 1992 WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have passed and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the Village under the "Budget Officer System" and WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of Illinois an annual budget for the fiscal year commencing May 1, 1991 to April 30, 1992 was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 4296 approved by the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect on April 16, 1991; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for fiscal 1991/92; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect believe the changes, as specified on the attached 1991/92 budget amendment pages, to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the fiscal year 1991/92 budget for the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby amended, as detailed on 1991/92 Budget Amendment No. I attached hereto, SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this 7th day of January, 1992. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk I Gerald L. Farley Village President ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 TO APRIL 30, 1992 WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have passed and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the Village under the "Budget Officer System" and WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of Illinois an annual budget for the fiscal year commencing May 1, 1991 to April 30, 1992 was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 4296 approved by the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect on April 16, 1991 and as amended by Ordinance No. adopted by the corporate authorities on January 7, 1992; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for fiscal 1991/92; and WHEREAS, the'President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect believe the changes, as specified on the attached 1991/92 budget amendment pages, to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the fiscal year 1991/92 budget for the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby amended, as detailed on 1991/92 Budget Amendment No. 2 attached hereto. SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this 7th day of January, 1992, ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ILLINOIS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CZAVELLO DATE: DECEMBER 16, 1991 SUBJECT: SELF CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS - FILL STATION Sealed bids were opened on December 10, 1991, at 10:00 A.M. for the proposed purchase of one (1) Self Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCEA) Fill Station. The bid results are as follows: BIDDER BID PRICE AIR ONE $5,500.00 W.S. DARLEY $5,300.00 In 1985 the Fire Department began purchasing new technology high pressure self contained breathing apparatus. These bottles are filled from our existing air compressor which is located at Fire Station #12, Golf and Busse. The department modified the existing compressor filling area to meet the needs of the high pressure and low pressure bottles. This modification has been functional, but does not present the safest or most efficient method of filling the air tanks. Since that modification, the proposed dual fill station has come on the market. This will allow a safe and efficient method of filling bottles that will meet OSHA and NFPA 1500 requirements. Funds are available in the 91/92 Budged on Page 86, as follows: $3,750 from Code 1-042-02-8011, and $1,550 from Code 51-042-02-8017 _rec.Zdt'he purchase from the low bidder, W. S. Darley. Edward M. Cavello Fire Chief EMC/mah Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director 14 DATE: December 27, 1991 SUBJECT: 1992 Bond Issue The Village's financing plans for 1992 include issuing bonds for flood control purposes and to reimburse the Capital Improvement Fund for property acquisition in the Triangle Redevelopment Area. Our original plans were to issue the bonds concurrently with the start of construction of the Central/WaPella Sewer Project which is scheduled for April or May 1992. However, because of the recent action of the Federal Reserve Board which has resulted in the lowest interest rates in the past 20 years, I believe we should try to sell our bonds as soon as possible. I discussed this possibility with Ron Norene, our financial advisor, and he agreed that this would be an opportune time to issue bonds. Most economists believe that interest rates will continue to stay low during the next few months, but Mr. Norene agrees that we would be taking a chance if we wait. If the Village Board would approve moving up our timetable, we could plan on selling the bonds on February 4, 1992. The tentative bond issue would be for $4,375,000 and would have a final maturity of 7 to 8 years. Based on current rates, Mr. Norene estimates that the interest rates on these bonds would range from 3.75% to 5.25% with a net interest cost of 4.8% - 4.9%. Attached is a schedule which shows the purposes for which the bonds would be issued. The Flood Control Purposes are based on the latest schedule and estimated costs from RJN and are all included in the 1992/93 budget. The proceeds from the portion for Capital Improvements will allow the Village to reimburse the Capital Improvement Fund for the purchase of the Chang Property. And the proceeds for Downtown Redevelopment will be reserved for property acquisition in TIF Area F. Normally if we were to issue bonds for property acquisition in a TIF Area they would be taxable bonds. However, because we can use up to 5% of a public purpose bond issue for private purposes, we have also included that amount in the proposed bond issue. None of the principal and interest payments for these bonds will be paid from the Village's property tax levy. The Flood Control portion will be paid from the proceeds of the additional 1/4¢ sales tax. The Capital Improvement portion will be paid from bond proceeds until the time that the property is sold to a developer, and the Downtown Redevelopment portion will be financed from TIF revenues. John Fulton Dixon Page 2 1992 Bond Issue In order to proceed with the bond sale we would need to authorize agreements with our Financial Advisor and Bond Counsel, Ron Norene's fee is based on a minimum of $4,500 plus $2.75 per $1,000 for all bonds in excess of $1,000,000. The tentative fee would be $13,781.25. Lew Greenbaum of Katten, Muchin & Zavis, our Bond Counsel, charges a fee of $1,500 plus $1.00 per $1,000 of bonds issued, or $5,875.00. These are the same fee structures that Mr. Norene and Mr. Greenbaum charged for the 1991 bond issue. We have received excellent service from Mr. Norene and Mr. Greenbaum in the past and it is my recommendation that we continue to use their services for this bond issue. I am requesting that the Village Board authorize agreements with R. V. Norene and Associates and Katten, Muchin & Zavis and authorize a tentative bond sale on February 4, 1992. DCJ/sm. Enc VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1992 General Obligation Bonds Tentative Sale Date - February 4, 1992 Flood Control Purposes: DesPlaines River Backwater Valve $ 200,000 Central/WaPella Sewer 1,750,000 Hatlin Heights Sewer 850,000 Total Flood Control $2,800,000 Capital Improvement Purposes: 1991/92 Fiscal Year Street Resurfacing $350,000 Sidewalk Construction 50,000 Building Improvements 25,000 Police Equipment 35,000 Public Works Equipment 40. -OM Totals $500,000 1992/93 Fiscal Year Street Resurfacing $500,000 Public Works Equipment 215,000 Fire Equipment I% Totals 865,000 Total Capital Improvements 1,365,000 Downtown Redevelopment Purposes: Property Acquisition 210,000 Total Bond Issue $4,315,0)Q Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director DATE: December 27, 1991 Subject: Funding Retiree Medical Benefits One of the nagging problems facing the Village of Mount Prospect and its retirees is the ever increasing cost of medical benefits. We have seen our costs jump 122% over the past five years and prospects for an improvement in the near future do not look good. The problem is not just a local phenomenon or a regional concern, it is a national problem and has affected the private sector as well as the public sector; it affects large and small employers; and the young along with the old. It presents a crisis situation to the multitudes of people who do not have any insurance coverage, and it is especially burdensome to people on fixed incomes. When,I notified Village retirees of our most recent rate increase to $161.50 per month for single coverage and $484.50 for family coverage, I received a number of letters and telephone calls from retirees telling of the hardship this will cause. (Currently, 43 former Village employees participate in the Village's Medical Plan. That number will continue to grow because the Village is mandated by State Statute to offer the Plan to Retirees at the normal premium cost.) Because retirees are generally living on a fixed income, it seems that one of the possible solutions would be for an employee to set aside at least a portion of retirement medical costs while the employee is still working. This approach could be accomplished by participating in one of the Village's deferred compensation plans (IGMA and PEBSCO) and using the proceeds during retirement years for medical insurance. However, one of the drawbacks to this approach is that the payments from the deferred compensation plans are taxable when they are received. I believe the key to an effective plan of providing for retirement medical costs while a person is still working is for the amounts to be tax-free when set aside and to be tax-free when used for medical benefits. I have discussed this concept with several employee groups and with other finance officers, but no one I have talked*to has been aware of a tax-free arrangement that could be used for this purpose. Then during the Spring Session of the Illinois Legislature, a bill was introduced (HB824) to require each municipality to offer a voluntary employees beneficiary association (VEBA) to police personnel. The bill was not passed, but I found out that a VEBA would in fact accomplish the goal of setting aside tax-free funds for future retirement medical costs. The definition of a VEBA follows: "A VEBA is a special type of tax- exempt organization that is specifically sanctioned by the IRS Code to provide benefits to employees or their dependents or designated beneficiaries. The benefits offered by a VEBA generally must be related to sickness, accident, or death." VEBA benefits are administered by a trust set up for the VEBA. John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager December 27, 1991 Funding Retiree Medical Benefits It is my understanding that a VEBA works on a principle that is similar to a flexible compensation plan that is allowed under IRS Section 125. Under a flexible compensation plan, an employee chooses to designate a portion of his/her earnings for certain specific benefits rather than to receive the earnings as a cash payment. Once the employee makes the election he/she must either use the benefit or lose it. For example, under the Village's FlexComp Plan, an employee can choose to designate up to $7,500 per year as medical benefits, $5,000 for dependent care and certain amounts for life insurance rather than to receive these amounts as earnings. Whatever amount is so designated then becomes a tax- exempt benefit to the employee. However, if the employee does not incur appropriate costs equal to the amount or amounts designated, the remaining balance is forfeited. Under a VEBA, an employee group can bargain for a portion of their salaries to be put into the VEBA or the Village could determine an amount to fund the VEBA. However, once an arrangement is determined, an individual employee does not have the option of making a separate arrangement. Any amounts put; into the plan are credited to individual employee trust accounts. The monies in the accounts earn interest and can only be distributed for approved costs for the employee and his/her dependents after the employee terminates employment. All proceeds would be tax-exempt when deposited and withdrawn. The amounts in the employee trust accounts qualify for tax exemption because they have been designated as medical/death benefits and the employee or his beneficiaries do not have the option of using the funds for any other purpose. Carol Widmer and I have discussed this concept over the last few months with three benefit consultants: 1) Public Employees Benefit Consultants, Inc; 2) Katten Muchin & Zavis; and 3) Deloitte & Touche. All three thought the concept was an interesting approach to funding retirement medical benefits and that it would be possible to implement such a plan. During our discussions, it was determined that we could achieve the same results through a "grantor trust" rather than a VEBA. The advantages of a grantor trust are that it is much easier to set up and to administer than a VEBA. One of the most critical questions is how a Plan like this would be funded. As I mentioned earlier, an employee group could bargain for a portion of their salaries to be put into the Plan and/or the Village could contribute to the funding. I recognize that this is not the time to expect the Village to offer new benefits, but possibly an existing taxable benefit could be exchanged to fund this type of Plan. Specifically, I believe the Village's Sick Leave Incentive Program could be exchanged for a tax-exempt plan for funding medical benefits during retirement. Long Beach, California funds a retiree health benefit plan in this manner. Following is a quotation from the notes to their Annual Financial Report: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager December 27, 1991 Funding Retiree Medical Benefits "Full-time City employees are entitled to receive up to 96 hours of sick leave per year. Unused sick leave is accumulated until termination or retirement. Upon termination, no sick leave benefits are vested; however, retirees receive City health benefits equal to the cash value of accumulated sick leave." The Village of Mount Prospect has a Sick Leave Incentive Program which works in the following manner: Employees are entitled to receive up to 12 days of sick leave per year. Unused sick leave is accumulated. After an employee has 60 days of unused sick leave accumulated, he/she is entitled to an annual cash pay out of 50% of the days in excess of 60 days. After the pay out, the remaining 50% of the sick leave in excess of 60 days is forfeited leaving a balance of 60 days "in the bank." Upon retirement, with 20 years service at any age or with 10 years service at age 60, the employee is entitled to a cash pay out of 50% of all unused sick leave. The pay out at termination includes any current accumula- tion and whatever time is "in the bank." If the Sick Leave Incentive amount currently being paid out would instead be designated as a medical benefit to be used after termination, it could provide a tax-free means of funding at least a portion of retiree medical costs. The current Sick Leave Incentive Program has been very effective in discouraging unnecessary use of sick leave. Last year, 102 out of 162 employees with more than five years service qualified for the incentive payment. I believe a tax- exempt benefit would be an even greater incentive to avoid unnecessary use of sick leave. To determine the effect of changing the Sick Leave Incentive Program to a Plan for funding medical costs during retirement, I divided the Village work force into the four employee groups and then applied an average value to the actual pay out for unused sick days as of December 31, 1990. The four groups include the three Village bargaining groups and a group for "all other employees." Following is a summary of the results- Group No.of Members No.with 5+yrs Service No.who Recd Fa Out Total Days Paid Total Amount Paid Average Value Per D Firefighters 53 28 17 85.38 $15,039.20 $176.14 Police 54 33 19 93.02 13,585.63 146.05 Public Works 40 25 7 22,75 3,297.00 118.81 All Others 126 76 59 300.39 53,385.37 177.72 Totals 273 16,z 102 501. 4 $$85307.20 170.09 3 John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager December 27, 1991 Funding Retiree Medical Benefits The All Other category or the employees not a part of the three bargaining groups is further subdivided below: Group No.of Members No.with 5+yrs Service No.who Recd EaOut Total Days _Paid Total Amount Paid Average Value Pe r Day Village Mgmt 15 7 6 34.62 $ 6,371.24 $184.03 Fire Mgmt 16 16 14 68.60 14,959.96 218.08 Police Mgmt 16 16 16 87.91 17,163.05 195.23 P.W. Mgmt 13 13 9 38.45 7,128.87 185.41 Clerical & Technical 66 24 14 70,81 7,762.2,5 109.62 Totals L2676 59 300.39 k53.385.3737 N/A Although it is not possible to determine the actual tax savings for each employee because of individual circumstances, the savings would be substantial. If the Sick Leave Incentive would be tax exempt rather than taxable, the following taxes and pension contributions would be waived: Employee "% Village 8 Federal Income Tax 158 - 338 State Income Tax 38 - Medicare 1.458 1.458 Social Security 6.28 6.28 IMRF Pension 4.58 11.298 If a person would only qualify for the Federal and State tax savings at the minimum rates, the person would save 188 plus the Federal tax on interest earned on the funds on deposit. If the employee pays Medicare, Social Security and IMRF the percentage savings at the minimum rates would be 30.158. The actual amount would vary for each individual depending on their circumstances. The Village would also realize a savings for any amounts subject to Medicare, Social Security and IMRF Pension contributions. To show the potential amount that an employee could have available for retirement medical costs by using the Sick Leave Incentive monies for funding a Retirement Medical Benefit Plan, the following hypothetical case was developed: 4 John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager December 27, 1991 Funding Retiree Medical Benefits If an employee receives credit for 4.92 days (the average of all days paid for 1990) each year for 15 years at an average value of $170.09 per day for the first year with an increase of 58 per year thereafter and the funds on deposit earn 7.58 interest while on deposit, the employee would have an account equal to $29,461 at the end of 15 years (employed a minimum of 20 years). If this amount would be received in equal annual installments for 10 years after that time, the annual installment would be $4,294. (Total tax-free benefits of $42,940.) In the above example, the employee would have "exchanged" $18,061 in sick - incentive pay over a 20 year period for medical benefits after retirement of $42,940. This represents a significant benefit to the employee, but the value is even greater when the taxes that would be paid on the $18,061 are considered. If we assume that the employee would be required to pay 208 in taxes, the balance left after taxes is reduced to $14,449. In effect, the employee would be giving up $14,449 in disposable income while working for medical benefits after retirement of $42,940. This is a hypothetical case, but I think that it shows the potential funding that could be made available for retiree medical costs. If we were to make this change we would need to develop a Plan document and then the Village Board would need to approve it. Also it would require a number of employee meetings to explain the advantages and disadvantages to employees. (We have discussed the concept with the Medical Insurance Committee and the Firefighters' Bargaining Committee and they have been enthusiastic about the possibility.) It would be my expectation that the Finance Department would administer the Plan in much the same manner that the FlexComp Plan is ad- ministered. There would be some cost to the Village, but I believe this cost would be more than offset by the savings in FICA and IMRF contributions. If all of the IMRF employees had been participating in the program as of December 31, 1990, the savings to the Village would have been $4,600. Recently, we asked the three consultants to submit proposals for developing a Plan Document and providing a legal opinion that the Plan would be tax-exempt. The three proposals were similar in price range but considerably different in scope. Public Employee Benefit Consultants proposed developing a plan document for $7,000 but they would not submit a legal opinion. Katten Muchin & Zavis quoted a range of $5,000 to $7,000 for developing a plan and providing the legal opinion, but they indicated it could be more if they encountered problems. Deloitte & Touche quoted a fee not to exceed $6,000. Both Carol Widmer and I thought the representative from Deloitte & Touche had the best understanding of what we wanted to accomplish, and it is our recommendation that we accept the Deloitte & Touche proposal. Funding for this project is available in the current budget. A copy of the Deloitte & Touche proposal is attached. Enc Deloiffe & buche WO udewof Pla7,@ Un N,-Wh S'tetson Avenije Chicaga, Ih riot , 60601 elephone 02 946 3000 December 20, 1991 Mr. David C. Jepson Director of Finance 100 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Dear David: 7�" ,,ieccpc,r 3''71000-2600 As I indicated in our telephone conversation on Tuesday, we would like to help you restructure your sick day program so as to incorporate post employment medical benefits into the program. For a fee not to exceed $6,000, we will do the following: I.' Meet with you order to review your thoughts as to plan specifications and features' and to conclude lay the end of the meeti�g'the par etersf0rthe planAlso at this meeting, w e will identify Issues, if any, thatneed tob, researched or otherwise considered further. 2. Research unsolved issues and discuss our conclusions with you. No written report will be issued with respect to our conclusions. However, the plan, trust and opinion letter we prepare will be consistent with our conclusions.. Built-in to our proposed fee is eight hours of research time. We expect this to be sufficient. If it appears that it will not be sufficient, we will seek your approval before proceeding,If you approve additional research, we will bill accordingly - on the amount of additional time approved. 3. Draft a combined sick pay/post retirement medical benefits plan. Draft a #rantor trust agreement. Prepare an opinion letter concerning the tax treatment of payments made from the trust to or on behalf of former employees. 4. Submit to you drafts of the plan, trust and opinion letter for your review. 5. Finalize the plan, trust and opinion letter after we have received your input. December 20, 1991 Mr. David C. Jepson Page Two 6. Review the communications materials that you will prepare. 7. Meet with you at the conclusion of the project to discuss our work product and any questions that you may have. If you would like us to proceed, please let me know by returning an executed copy of this letter. I look forward to working with you. Best wishes for a happy holiday season. Sincerely, Brady J. Langford Senior Manager David C. Jepson for the Village of Mount Prospect weft& e h18w — — ------- -