HomeMy WebLinkAbout4330_001Vi—LLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4360
Next Resolution No. 39-91
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor
Senior Citizen Center
So South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
November 5, 1991
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald IlSkipll Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floras
Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilke
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Floros
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, October 15, 1991
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYORIS REPORT
A. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: Village Hall & Human Services
B. PRESENTATION: Historical Society presentation to
NTN Bearing Corporation
C. PRESENTATION: Mount Prospect Constitution
BiCentennial Commission presentation
to the Village of Mount Prospect
D. PROCLAMATION: Project Red Ribbon, November 17, 1991
through January 5, 1992
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 33-V-91, 1623 Cedar Lane
The Petitioner is requesting variations to
allow a sideyard of 7 feet, rather than the
required 10 feet; a rear yard setback of
7 feet, rather than the required 15 feet; and,
a zero foot separation between the pool deck
and house deck, in order to allow an
existing above ground swimming pool and deck.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
these requests by a vote of 2-4. At the request
of the Petitioner, this case was continued from
the October 15th Board meeting due to the fact
that a 2/3 vote of the Village Board is required in
order to override the Zoning Board of Appeals
recommendation to deny and only 5 members were in
attendance.
ALL
B.
ZBA 57-A-91 and ZBA 58 -SU -91, 1028 S. Elmhurst Road
1. ist reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVII
OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE" OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance amends the Zoning Ordinance
to provide for non -ground mounted satellite
antennas as a Special Use in a B-1 Shopping
Center District. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0.
2. ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY MOWN
AS 1028 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
This ordinance grants a Special Use to
allow the installation of a roof -mounted
satellite antenna on the Walgreen store
located at 1028 S. Elmhurst Road. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting, this request by a vote of 6-0.
C. ZBA 60-V-9--, 219 South Leonard
1'st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERLY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 219 S. LEONARD LANE
This ordinance grants a variation to allow a 2-1/2
foot side yard setback for a shed, rather than the
required 5 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals vote
of 3-3 resulted in a recommendation to deny the
request.
D.ZBA 61-V-91, 1631 Greenwood Avenue
ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1631 GREENWOOD AVENUE
This Ordinance grants variations to accommodate
a circular driveway and to allow a 42% front
yard lot coverage, rather than the permitted 35%.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by a vote of 6-0.
E. ZBA 62-V-91, 108 North Main Street
ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 108 NORTH MAIN STREET
This ordinance grants variations to accommodate
a circular driveway and to allow a 45.7% front
yard lot coverage, rather than the 35% permitted.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by a vote of 6-0.
(Exhibit A)
(Exhibit B)
(Exhibit C)
(Exhibit D)
(Exhibit E)
F. ZBA 63-V-91, 8 South Busse Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 8 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a
484 square foot shed, rather than the 120 square
feet permitted. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit F)
G. ZBA 64 -SU -91, 501 W. Algonquin Road
ist reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 4156, GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE
OF A PLANNED, UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ROGERS
CORPORATE PARK
Chis ordinance amends Ordinance No. 4156 to
allow the inclusion of additional property within
the Planned Unit Development for Rogers Corporate
Park on South Elmhurst Road. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a (Exhibit G)
vote of 6-0.
H. ZBA 65 -SU -91, 400 East Blue Jay Court
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 4187, GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE
OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ORCHARD
FIELD TOWNHOMES, 400 EAST RAND ROAD
This Ordinance amends the site plan attached to
Ordinance No. 4187 to reflect patios on specific
townhomes to encroach into the perimeter yard.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit H)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 66-V-91, 215 South Hi Lusi
The Petitioner is requesting variations to
allow a room addition 8.75 feet and deck 5 feet
from an existing detached garage. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0.
B. ZBA 67-V-91, 216 South Main Street
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a driveway width of 33 feet, at the widest point.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this variation by a vote of 4-0. At the request
of the Petitioner, this case will be presented
to the Village Board for consideration at the
November 19, 1991 meeting.
C. ZBA 69 -SU -91 and ZBA 70 -SU -91, 606 W. Northwest Hwy:
The Petitioner, Citgo, is requesting an amendment
to the Special Use granted in Ordinance No. 2572
by modifying the site plan to accommodate construction
of a new convenience store building, gas pump islands
and canopies, resulting in a minimum setback of 10 feet
for the building and structures, rather than the
required 301; to allow a zero parking lot setback at
the closest point, rather than the required 301; and,
to allow 3 off-street parking spaces, rather than the
required 8 spaces. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by a vote of 4-0.
D. Recommendations of the Safety Commission:
1. Request of residents for a 3 -way STOP
at Emerson and Milburn. The Safety
Commission recommended denial by a vote
of 7-0.
2. Request of resident for painted cross
walks within the Mount Prospect Plaza
Shopping Center. The Safety Commission
recommended contacting the owner of the
property since this is private property.
3. Request of residents to delete the
No Parking restriction on Sunday for the
200 block of South Pine street, adjacent
to St. Mark Church. The Safety Commission
recommended denying the request.
E. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF SPECIFIED
MINUTES OF EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
This Resolution authorizes certain minutes of
executive sessions to be released from
confidentiality, as directed by the Village Board. (Exhibit J)
F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE kXENDING ARTICLE VIII
OF CHAPTER 8 ENTITLED "REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance establishes an exemption from
the real estate transfer tax for anyone
participat4ng in the State of Illinois H.O.M.E. (Exhibit K)
Program.
G. Recommendation to accept private and public
improvements installed in conjunction with
'Spot No--' the new car wash at River &
Kensington Roads.
H. Recommendation to accept private and public
improvements installed in conjunction with the
construction of Nicholas office Building,
240 East Lincoln Street.
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Gasoline? and diesel fuel
B. Recommendation to retain consultant to evaluate
storm water detention basins in the Kensington
Center for Business
c. Recommendation to retain consulting engineer
relative to the reconstruction of Maple Street
between Busse Avenue and Central Road.
D. Recommendation to obtain soils tests, which
are required in conjunction with the construction
of the Fire and police Station.
X1. ANY OTHER :BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCTOBER 15, 1991
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Absent: Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Clowes.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the
Regular Meeting of the
MINUTES
Mayor and Board of Trustees held October 1, 1991.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse,
Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
APPROVE BILIS
to approve the following list
of bills:
General Fund
$ 911,344
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
123,024
Community Development Block Grant Fund 8,395
Illinois Municipal Retirement
Fund 197,926
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
440,147
Parking System Revenue Fund
4,098
Risk Management Fund
127,612
Vehicle Replacement Fund
2,272
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or
Rep. Fund 8,121
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
1985 -
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
1991 264
Fire & Police Building Const.
51,805
Flood Control Revenue Fund
480
Corporate Purpose Improvement
1990 -
Debt Service Funds
-
Flexcomp Trust Fund
6,540
Escrow Deposit Fund
17,092
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
-
Benefit Trust Fund
2,167,
$1,901,287
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
accept the financial report dated September 30, 1991,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - October 15, 1991
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENSC TO BE HEARD
None.
RALPH STADLER
MAY'OR'S REPORT
Mayor Farley presented a Resolution acknowledging Ralpka',
RETIREMENT
Stadler, who ;is retiring following 26 years of service
with the Mount Prospect Volunteer Fire Department.
RES.NO. 35-91
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 35-91.
A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE CONTRIBUTIONS
OF RALPH L. STADLER
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert'
Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
EMPLOYEE
Mayor Farley and Fire Chief Edward Cavello
in conjunction'
RECOGNITION:
acknowledged the following employees,
POLICE DEPT.
with the annual quinquennial. anniversaries:
Raymond E. Kordecki 30 years
Robert B. Clark 20 years
Arthur W. Felski 20 years
Kenneth B. Stahl 20 years
Charles E. Livingston 15 years
James M. Flory 5 years
Anthony T. Hu:emann 5 years
Brendan M. Keady 5 years
Douglas D. Lukash 5 years
John J. Malcolm 5 years
Michael T. Werner 5 years
Donald A. Wisniewski,Jr. 5 years
Chris Truty 5 years
OUTSTANDING
Chief Cavello and Mayor Farley presented plaques for
SERVICE OF
Outstanding Service to Diana Todd and Patricia Brown,
CITIZENS
who, as residents, gave emergency medical treatment to
a person having a heart attack.
MERITORIOUS
The following members of the Fire Department were:
acknowledged for outstanding service as members of the^^^.
Fire Department:
Inspector Tristan, Sue Peyton,
Firefighter/Paramedics John Malcolm, Peter Morris,
Mike Kless, Mark Ceisel, Jeff Hunt, Matt Canning,;
Kevin Wilson, and Lt. Robert Clark and Lt. Henry
Dawson
ROGER NEITZKE
Ralph Stadler, retired Deputy Fire Chief of the Mount:
MEMORIAL PLAQUE
Prospect Volunteer Fare Department, presented it
memorial plaque to the widow of former Deputy Firs.
Chief Roger Neitzke, who passed away last year.
PRESENTATION
Fire Chief Cavello announced that the Mount Prospect
RECEIPT OF
Fare Department was awarded First Place in the
Book for the State of Illinois.
AWARDS
Annual Scrap Contest
POSTER CONTEST
Mayor Farley, Chief Cavello and Inspector Mario Tristan
AWARDS
presented the winners of the annual Fire Preventio:z
Week Poster Contest:, which includes students from
schools within the Village.
Page 2 - October 15, 1991
Mayor Farley proudly noted the birth of his 6th
grandchild, Christopher Gerald, born to his son
earlier in the.day.
OLD BUSINESS
None.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 33-V-91, 1623 Cedar Lane
The Petitioner is requesting variations to
allow a sideyard setback of 7 feet, rather than
the required 10 feet; a rear yard setback of
7 feet, rather than the required 15 feet; and,
a zero foot separation between a pool deck and
a house deck in order to permit an existing
above ground swimming pool. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended denying these requests by a
vote of 2-4.
It was noted that this case had been before the
Zoning Board of Appeals on two occasions. At the
first hearing, neighbors expressed their desire
to have a 6 foot fence, which would screen the
pool. The Petitioner then filed a petition for
a variation to permit the 6 foot fence. It was
the opinion of the Zoning Board of Appeals that
the requested variations should not be granted
since the Petitioner installed the pool and built
the deck for the pool without benefit of a permit.
Trustees expressed the fact that they agreed
with the Zoning Board of Appeals and noted that
if the Petitioner had requested a building
permit, they would have known about the required
setbacks.
The neighbors expressed their feelings that they
had no objections to the pool as long as the fence
was installed.
Inasmuch as a 2/3 majority vote would be
necessary to override the denial of the Zoning
Board of Appeals, and the fact that 2 Trustees
were absent, the Petitioner requested that this
case be continued to the November 5th meeting of
the Village Board.
This case will be presented November 5th for
Village Board action.
ZBA 57-A-91 and ZBA 58 -SU -91, 1028 S. Elmhurst Road
The Petitioner, Walgreen company, is requesting a
text amendment to Chapter 14 to allow a non -ground
mounted satellite antenna as a Special Use in a
B-1 Shopping Center District. Also request is a
Special Use to permit a non -ground (roof) mounted
satellite antenna at the subject property. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by votes of 6-0.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the text amendment being the
subject of ZBA 57-A-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse' Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 - October 15, 1991
MAYOR
FARLEY'S
NEWEST
GRANDSON
ZBA 33-V-91
1623 CEDAR LN
ZBA 57-A-91
ZBA 58 -SU -91
1*028 S.EIMHUPST
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur With,the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the Special Use being the subject of
zBA 58 -SU -91 -
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, CldWes, HOefert
Nays.- None
Motion carried.
ordinances will be presented for first readings at the
next meeting of the Village Board on November 5, 1991.
ZBA 60-V-91 ZBA 60-V-91, 219 South Leonard Lane
219 S. LEONARD The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a 2-
1/2 foot side yard setback, in order to permit the
location of an existing shed. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended denying this request by a vote of
3-3.
It was noted that the neighbors objected to the sight
of this shed, however, it was noted that if the
Petitioner was required to move the shed to a permitted
area, the neighbor would still see it. There was a
recommendation from the Board that the Petitioner plant,
shrubs in an effort to reduce the visual impact on the
neighbors. This was acceptable to the neighbors.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to grant the variation requested in ZBA 60 -V -91 -
Upon roll call; Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoet ert
Nays: None
motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented November 5th for first
reading.
ZBA 61-V-91 ZBA 61-V�91, 1631 Greenwood Avenue -
1631 GREENWOOD The Petitioner is requesting variations to accommodate
a circular driveway and to allow a front yard lot
coveragel�of 45.7t. The.reqUeSt for lot coverage WAS
reduced by the Petitioner to 4A at the Zoning Board
of Appeal's meeting. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended graht�ing the request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to
concur with the recot*jspdation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals And grant the variations requested in ZBA 61�
V 91, as amended,.
Upon roll call: Ayes.- Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefer�
Nays�z None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented November 5th for first
reading.
ZBA 62-V-91 ZBA 62-V-91, 108 North MainStreet
108 N. MAIN ST The Petitioner is requesting variations to accommodate
a circular driveway and to allow a 45.7% front yard lot
coverage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 6-0.
Page 4 - October 15, 1991
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the variations requested in
ZBA 62-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented November 5th for
first reading.
ZBA 63-V-91, 8 South Busse Road
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a 484 square foot accessory structure, a shed,
rather than the permitted 120 square feet. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the
variation requested.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the variations
requested in ZBA 63-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
0-TST-Mr-R. WE M -
An Ordinance will be presented November 5th for
first reading.
ZBA 64 -SU -91, 501 West Algonquin Road
The Petitioner, Rogers Corporate Industrial Park,
is requesting an amendment to the existing Planned
Unit Development by incorporating the property commonly
known as 501 West Algonquin Road, into the PUD, which
property was recently acquired by the Rogers
Corporation. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting the Special use requested to amend the PUD.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the Special Use requested in
ZBA 64 -SU -91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented November 5th for
first reading.
ZBA 65 -SU -91, 500 East Blue Jay Court
The Petitioner is*requesting an amendment to
the existing Orchard Field Townhome Planned Unit
to allow patios on some of the townhomes within
the development to encroach by 10 feet into the
required 20 foot perimeter yard. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-0.
It was noted that the Petitioner would like to
modify the floor plan on some of the townhomes
to enclose the proposed patio and convert it
into an eating area or sun room, which would
result on a new location for the patio encroaching
into the perimeter yard.
Page 5 - October 15, 1991
ZBA 63-V-91
8 S. BUSSE RD
ZBA 64 -SU -91
ROGERS CORP.
ZBA 65 -SU -91
500 BLUE JAY
Residents to the west of this development expressed
their concern relative to the condition of the area
during construction and requested a 6 foot high fence
be installed as a screen, which was acceptable to the
Petitioner.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the Special Use requested in
ZBA 65 -SU -91 -
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented November 5th for
first reading.
AMEND ORD. An ordinance was presented for first reading that
NO.. 4257 would amend Ordinance No. 4257 by deleting section
1002 PROSPECT Four, which states the variation would be null and void
MANOR after one year if a permit is not obtained prior to
that time. Since the request granted in Ordinance No.
42.57 was for a Special Use, the one year validity
clause was placed in the Ordinance in error.
Page 6 - October 15, 1991
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4358
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4358
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4257
GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED
AT 1002 PROSPECT MANOR
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CDBG FUNDS
A Resolution was presented that would authorize
specified Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
Funds to be transferred into the Single Family Housing
Rehabilitation Program, dire to the anticipated requests,
for participation in this program.
RES.NO. 36-91
Trustee Clowes; seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 36-91.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
9-1-1
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
reduce the surcharge for Enhanced 9-1-1 from $.75 pe:c
line to $.30.
Page 6 - October 15, 1991
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved ORD.NO. 4359
for passage of Ordinance No. 4359
AN ORDINANCE REDUCING THE 9-1-1 SURCHARGE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented that would authorize TIF:
the Village to enter into an Agreement with BROADACRE
Broadacre Development Company to serve as
consultant and developer of the downtown business
district.
There was discussion among members of the Village
Board relative to the proposed agreement, who
asked that the Agreement be amended to require
periodical updates, at 6 month intervals, as to
expenses, as well as a summary of activities
undertaken by Broadacre.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
RES.NO. 37-91
moved for passage of Resolution No. 37-91, as
amended.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented that would adopt a
COMPREHENSIVE
Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy
HOUSING
for the Village.
AFFORDABILITY
STRATEGY
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
(CHAS)
moved for passage of Resolution No. 38-91
RES.NO.38-91
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE
HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY FOR THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clovies, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager, John Fulton Dixon, stated that a FIRE &
gas and/or oil tank that was buried under the old POLICE
Public Safety Building had leaked and soil tests STATION
have been submitted to determine if the soil has
been contaminated. When the test results are
received and evaluated, construction will begin
on the new building.
Mr. Dixon stated that administration is looking MAPLE ST:
into the -possibility of reconfiguring Maple Street RECONFIGURE
in order to widen the roadway for emergency
vehicles, in conjunction with the construction of
the new Fire and Police Station.
Page 7 - October 15, 1991
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
COMMITTEE OF It was noted that due to the fact that at least
THE WHOLE 2 Trustees would be out of town next week, the
MEETING, regular committee of the Whole meeting scheduled
CANCELLED for october 22 was cancelled.
EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE SESSION
SESSION Mayor Farley stated that the Board would go into
Executive Session for the purpose of reviewing minutes
of previous Executive Sessions to determine if any of
those minutes could be released from confidentiality,
as well as discussing litigation and land acquisition.
Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
go into Executive Session to review minutes of
executive sessions, discuss litigation and land
acquisition.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Board went into Execution Session at 10:58 P.M.
RECONVENE Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 11:46 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Busse
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Hoefert
Absent: Trustee Floros
Trustee Wilks
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
release the following minutes of Executive Sessions:
May 22, 1991
June 18, 1991
,September 11, 1991
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoeferl:
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution will be presented at the next regular
meeting, November 5th, to officially release the
minutes of previous Executive Sessions as stated.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT I
Mayor Farley declared the meeting adjourned at
11:47 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 8 - October 15, 1991,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
October 11 - 31, 1991
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
10/11/91 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
10111191
10/31/91
List of Bills
Entry 10131/91
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 2,701,737
$1,381,929
$ 995,587
$ 3,088,079
Motor Fuel Tax
603,475
80,892
44,068
640,299
Community Development Block Grant Fund
892
9,000
9,193
699
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
88,152
45,466
10,649
122,969
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
3,587,573
326,752
125,797
3,788,528
Parking System Revenue
146,599
11,751
2,261
156,089
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,120,323
186,370
122,166
1,184,527
Vehicle Replacement Fund
557,377
-
90,378
466,999
CaRital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
243,687
83,905
6,840
320,752
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
117,337
375
-
117,712
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1991
492,823
-
234,087
258,736
Police & Fire Building Construction
6,245,120
33,106
6,212,014
Flood Control Revenue -Fund
2,752,973
-
32,153
2,720,820
Debt Service Fund
1,570,066
27,036
-
1,597,102
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
3,403
3,599
-
7,002
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,355,529
207,345
30,566
1,532,308
Police Pension Fund
16,544,896
103,982
42,299
16,606,579
Firemen's Pension Fund
18,555,126
93,841
44,568
18,604,399
Benefit Trust Funds
242 975
8,000
-
250.975
556,930,063
$2,570,243
51.823.718
$57,676.588
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ABC PLUMBING
AHERN SIGN CO.
ALL AMERICAN ROOFING
JUANITA ASCENDO
ANN BADER
BASKIN ROBBINS #3500
BELL FUELS, INC.
BEN'S PLUMBING
BERGEN CONSTRUCTION CORP
JAMES A. BROW
ALBERT BRUNO
C A P PROPERTIES
V.J. CENTRACCHIO & SON INC.
JULES J. CHARPENTIE
CINCINNATI METALS
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COPY MAN
CREATIVE DECK BUILDERS, INC.
CUSTOM SEWER SERVICE
STEVEN D'AMICO
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C8947 ABC PLBG REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
1395 AHERN SIGN REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C9862 ALL AMERICAN ROOFING
$50.00
$50.00
OVERPMT ORDINANCE FINE
$5.00
$5.00
REFUND DUP AMB PMT
$125.00
$125.00
REFUND FOOD/BEV OVERPMT
$194.00
$194.00
FUEL
$8,340.80
$8,340.80
C9962 BENS PLBG REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C4881 BERGEN REFUND
C4881A BERGEN REFUND
$345.00
$7,525.00
$7,870.00
REFUND FINAL WATER OVERPMT
$1.90
$1.90
OVERPMT BUSINESS LICENSE
$15.00
$15.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.48
$4.76
$5.24
C9911 CENTRACCHIO REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$10.18
$.98
$11.16
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
OVERPMT BUSINESS LICENSE
$37.50
$37.50
PAYMENT P4R 10/17491
$224.25
$224.25*
REFUND FI AL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.16
$21.42
$23.58
09890 CREATIVE DECK BLDRS REF
$100.00
$100.00
08273 CUSTOM SEWER REFUND
$50.00
08290 CUSTOM SEWER REFUND
$50.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
07982 DAMICO REFUND
P4R ENDING 10/17/91
$399,795.44
P4R ENDING 10417491
$2,011.08
P4R ENDING 10/17/91
$728.58
P4R ENDING 10417491
$38,164.67
P4R ENDING 10417491
$3,994.35
P4R ENDING 10/21491
$167.40
P4R ENDING 10421491
$16.66
P4R ENDING 10431491
$408,650.13
P4R ENDING 10431491
$1,161.29
P4R ENDING 10431491
$743.98
P4R ENDING 10/31491
$35,025.78
$890,459.36*
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
DISTINGUISHED HOMES
DO IT RIGHT ROOTER
DREW CONSTRUCTION
KAREN ELDRUP
EZELL BUILDERS
RICHARD EMMONS
T. FALLUCCA
MARTIN FELD
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
FREDIANI HOMES INC.
DAVID FRUMET
SUSAN FURUKAWA
GEISER-BERNER
WILLIAM W. GIERAHN
TOM GROCHOCINSKI
ROSEMARY GROENWALD
GUARANTEED HOME IMP., INC.
ROBERT C. GUYNN
RICHARD HASKINS
ROBERT HECKMAN
HEWLETT PACKARD
GEORGE HEYMAN
JEFF HOLDSBERG
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91 -
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C7859 DISTINGUISHED HOMES
$425.00
C7859 DISTINGUISHED HOMES
$1,610.00
$2,035.00
C10003 DO IT RIGHT ROOTER
$105.00
$105.00
C8460 DREW CONST REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C8430 ELDRUP REFUND
$100.00
C9094 ELDRUP REFUND
$100.00
$200.00
C9853 EZELL BLDRS REFUND
$500.00
C9854 EZELL BLDRS REFUND
$100.00
C9881 EZELL BLDRS REFUND
$500.00
C9910 EZELL BLDRS REFUND
$500.00
$1,600.00
C8791 EMMONS REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C9527 FALLUCCA REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C5222 FELD REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
SAVINGS BONDS P/R 10/31/91
$455.00
SAVINGS BONDS P R10/17/91
$400.00
DUE TO FED DEP PR 10/17
$10,648.97
DUE TO FED DEP PR 10/17
$152.16
DUE TO FED DEP PR 1O/17
$54.10
DUE TO FED DEP PR 10/17
$2,792.37
DUE TO FED DEP PR 1OZ17
$1,262.56
$15,765.16*
C8810 FREDIANI REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
C9450 FRUMET REFUND
$35.00
$35.00
C9707 FURUKAWA REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C10009 GEISER-BERNER REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$114.38
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$11.54
$125.92
C9419 GROCHOCINSKI REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
C7768 GROENWALD REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
C9792 GUARANTEED HOME IMP
$50.00
$50.00
C9786 GUYNN REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C9491 HASKINS REFUND
$70.00
$70.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$126.14
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$12.72
$138.86
3RD QTR MICE CHARGE
$309.00
$309.00
C9385 HEYMAN REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C9227 HOLDSBERG REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/3191
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
HOMES BY HEMPHILL, INC.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$53.80
$5.42
$59.22
IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
NOV 91 VOL LIFE
$153.00
$153.00*
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
ENDING 11
$508.00*
P YMENTP1R101417/91
$254.00
KAYIMA INTERNATIONAL
C8545 KAY TT MA iNNTL REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
HO KWAN KIM
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.96
$9.53
$10.49
KNIGHTS OF HUNTINGTON APTS.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
BILL
$12.48
$123.76
$136.24
JUANITA LEGRAND
REFUND FINAL WATER
REFUND DUP AMB PMT
$125.00
$125.00
JOHN LIU
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$14.28
$1.44
$15.72
LORENS RODDING & PLUMBING
C9870 LOREN RODDING REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
G. LUND
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$9.52
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.96
$10.48
STUART MCKILLOP
REFUND NOV HLTH CONTR
$39.00
$39.00*
MERLINO CONSTRUCTION
C9819 MERLINO CONST REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
ANNA MIOTKE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.55
$.45
$5.00
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
500111 METER REFUND
$85.24
$85.24
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
PPRT 7TH ALLOCATION
$4,288.21
$4,288.21*
EDWARD J. MURRAY
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.87
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.15
$2.02
NORTHWEST HEATING & AIR CONDIT
C9807 NW HVAC REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
GREG ORSINGER
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.68
$16.66
$18.34
PALDO SIGN & DISPLAY CO.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
1382 PALDO SIGN REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
PETER PANAGOPOUL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$6.42
$.65
$7.07
PARVIN CLAUSS SIGN CO.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
1399 CLAUSS REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
OCT FIRE PENSION DISB
$44,567.93
OCT POLICE PENSION DISB
$42,299.07
$86,867.00*
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$10.00
EXPENSES
$35.04
MISC EXPENSES
$35.00
$80.00*
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
PHOENIX BUILDERS
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTMASTER
PROSPECT GARDENS
R & S PLUMBING
R J & G SEWER
STEVEN RAWLEIGH
CORY REISER
DAVE RENDER
S & T ENTERPRISES
SAFE GUARD
SHAFFER HOME IMPR.
WILLIAM SCHULZE
SHELL OIL COMPANY
SCOTT SHIELDS
ALISON STAHL
STATE OF ILLINOIS
STAUNTON CONST. CO.
STEWART WARNER
JOHN TARNOW & ASSOC.
TED'S LAWN & GARDEN
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
THUNDERBIRD LANES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
C9905 PHOENIX BLDRS REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
POSTAGE METER ADV DEP
$3,000.00
$3,000.00*
POSTAGE STAMPS
$580.00
$580.00*
C9714 PROSPECT GARDENS REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C9893 R&S PLBG REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C9000 RJG SEWER REFUND
$75.00
09501 RJG SEWER REFUND
$100.00
C9770 RJG SEWER REFUND
$100.00
C9857 RJG SEWER REFUND
$100.00
C9929 RJ&G SEWER REFUND
$100.00
$475.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$40.46
$4.08
$44.54
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
RESR/E TR TAX REBATE
$330.00
$330.00
1392 MMRS P&ME REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C9860 S&T ENT REFUND
$175.00
$175.00
C9698 SAFE GUARD REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
C9801 SCHAFFER HOME IMP REF
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$9.52
$.96
$10.48
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
7157446 REFUND WATER METER
$63.34
$63.34
C9301 SHIELDS REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
C9828 STAHL REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
LIQUOR APP RECORD CK
$2.00
$2.00*
C9937 STAUNTON REFUND
$100.00
$470.00
$100.00
$470.00
C9295 WARNER REFUND
REFUND OVERPMT
$10.00
$10.00
C9599 TEDS LAWN REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND MONEY
$3,000.00
BOND MONEY
$1,950.00
BOND MONEY
$870.00
BOND MONEY
$1,800.00
BOND MONEY
$100.00
BOND MONEY
$700.00
BOND MONEY
$400.00
$8,820.00*
C9861 THUNDERBIRD REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
C4881 BERGEN REINSPECT
$155.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VOJTA LAGATTUTA & KELLY, P.C.
WAGS FAMILY RESTAURANT
JANET WEGLARZ
WEIDNER SEWER SERVICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%31191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
C5222 FELD REINSPECT
C6499 ARTISON REINS
C6503 CORINI REINS
C7768 GROENWALD REINS
C7859 DISTINGUISHED HOMES
08273 CUSTOM SEWER REIN
C8290 CUSTOM SEWER REIN
C8955 ZIEGER REINS
C9000 RJ&G SEWER REINS
C9042 WEIDNER SEWER REINS
C9227 HOLDSBERG REINS
C9295 WARNER REINS
C9301 SHIELDS REINS
09419 GROCHOCINSKI REINS
C9450 FRUMET REINS
C9491 HASKINS REINS
C9698 SAFEGUARD REINS
C9760 WEIDNERS REINS
C9860 S&T ENTERPR REINS
C9870 LOREN RODDING REINS
1399 PARVIN CLAUSS REINS
24189 SHELL OIL WATER USAGE
500111 MOBIL OIL WATER USAGE
T ANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
R
E TR TAX REFUND
RR FUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
C8320 WEGLARZ REFUND
C8284 WEIDNER REFUND
C8342 WEIDNER REFUND
C9042 WEIDNER REFUND
C9324 WEIDNERS REFUND
C9372 WEIDNER REFUND
C9502 WEIDNERS REFUND
C9719 WEIDNERS REFUND
C9760 WEIDNER REFUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
$50.00
$100.00
$100.00
$25.00
$75.00
$50.00
$50.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$50.00
$30.00
$50.00
$50.00
$15.00
$30.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$36.66
$14.76
$71,384.15
$218.00
$9.52
$.96
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$75.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$75.00
PAGE
TOTAL
$72,465.57*
$218.00
$10.48
$100.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
WOLF AND COMPANY
JOHN ZIEGER
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10131/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
C9914 WEIDNERS REFUND
1990/91 AUDIT
1990/91 AUDIT
C895 ZIEGER REFUND
GENERAL FUND $831,515.89
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $10,648.97
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $1,526.66
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $71,384.15
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $44,567.93
PAGE 6
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$100.00 $850.00
$500.00
$500.00 $1,000.00
$75.00 $75.00
***TOTAL** $1,113,006.17
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $3,324.53
WATER & SEWER FUND $77,134.32
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $39.00
POLICE PENSION FUND $42,299.07
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $30,565.65
********************************************************************************************************
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER COMPAN
2 TABLE SKIRTS 2169916-01
$198.37
$32.50
$198.37
$32.50
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
DELIVERY
REGISTER CLOWES
$450.00
$25.00
$475.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
LEGISLATIVE DINNER FARLEY
EXPENSES
$11.27
$12.11
EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$50.48
$73.86*
V & G PRINTERS INC.
ENVELOPES 75TH ANN COMM
$175.00
$175.00
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$954.73
GENERAL FUND
$954.73
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31191
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ARNSTEIN & LEHR
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$2.78
$273.00
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$388.50
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$205.50
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$1,318.79
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$942.00
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$3,355.50
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$388.50
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$1.80
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$31.50
$6,907.87
CRAIN'S CHICAGO BUSINESS
SUBSCRIPTION
$64.00
$49.00
$64.00
$49.00*
EAGLE TRAINING SEMINAR
SEMINAR WINTERCORN
DUES DIXON
$572.25
$572.25
ICMA
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
FILM
$219.96
$382.50
$219.96
$382.50
DAVID C. NEWMAN
OUR DESIGNS
LEGAL SERVICES
BRASS SPEAKING TRUMPET
$90.95_
$90.95
RONALD W. PAVLOCK
EXPENSES
$400.00
$144.75
$400.00
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$246.08
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$292.05
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$246.10
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$56.04
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$13.75
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$65.07
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$55.00
$1,118.84
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$20.87
$76.85
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
$74.25
MISC EXPENSES
$70.69
MISC EXPENSES
$13.70
*`
MISC EXPENSES
$10.79
$267.15*
ROOSEVELT UNIVERSITY
COMPUTER CLASS -CLARK S.
$250.00
$516.06
$250.00
$516.06
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$10,838.58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10131/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $10,838.58
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
CABLE WORLD
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$38.00
$700.00
$38.00
$700.00
DEWOLFE MUSIC LIBRARY
ANNUAL MUSIC LIBRARY
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
EDWARD FRANCE
CHARLES R. HARDY & ASSOCIATES
SERVICES RENDERED
$500.00
$500.00
J. V. JOHNSON & ASSOC.
SUPPLIES
$85.20
SUPPLIES
$76.70
SUPPLIES
$73.28
RECOGNITION ITEMS
$290.22
CR RECOGNITION ITEMS
$25.29-
$500.11
MELANIE KRUPP
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
CAROLYN A. MILLER
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
$50.00
SUSAN MUELLER
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$10.29
$23.32
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
$35.70
MISC EXPENSES
$5.41
MISC EXPENSES
$22.86
MISC EXPENSES$17.46
$115.04*
APRIL RAJCZYK
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
JONNA SHOUB
TACOMA RUBBER STAMP & MRK SYS.
COMM ASST BD MTG
PLAQUE
$32.33
$32.33
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$2,060.48
GENERAL FUND
$2,060.48
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1031%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUCKEYE BUSINESS PRODUCTS
IBM RIBBONS
$175.24
$978.04
$175.24
$9.78.04
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
CONNECTRONIX CORPORATION
COPIER PAPER
EMULATOR CARDS
$818.00
$818.00
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
MEMBERSHIP
$395.00
$53.00
$395.00
$53.00
KIPLINGER WASHINGTON LETTER
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
SUBSCRIPTION
REGISTER MICHAELSON
$85.00
$85.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$ 8.80
$5.62
$14.42*
PITNEY BOWES INC.
EQUIPMENT MTCE AGREEMENT
$140.00
$27.25
$140.00
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$6.64
OFFICE SUPP16IES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$28.00
$124.82
$186.71
OFFICE SUPPLIES
DRUM CARTRIDGE
$211.88
$211.88
RCM DATA CORP
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERY
$18.20
$13.04
$18.20
$13.04
XL/DATACOMP INC.
OCTOBER MTCE SERVICE
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$3,088.53
GENERAL FUND
$3,088.53
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF
MEMBERSHIP FIELDSILOWE
$150.00
$248.62
$150.00
$248.62
J. V. JOHNSON & ASSOC.
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
CAPS
PLAQUE
$35.76
$20.90
$35.76
$20.90
ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERY
$65.93
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
$31.65
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL NOTICE
$63.30
LEGAL NOTICE
$65.93
LEGAL NOTICE
$89.67
*00'SZTS
00'SZTS
HHNHHM QHHHQNHH SSOIAHHS
ONINNVOJSHDIAHHS
SS'£ZS'£5
OS'68S'Z$
SS'£ZS'£5
OS'££L'T$
ONINNVD/SHDIAHHS
00'958$
ONINNHD QHHH4NHH SOAS
00'ST$
00'STS
MOOSHnD SHOIAHHS
0T'£££$
OT'Z85
X -£669L91006
00'ISZ$
X-$6TL£LT006
00'09T'ZS
00'091`Z$
VNIQHW SSIdHNHH 2dWHNn
58'S9v'8$
S8'S9v'85
HONVHnSNI HZZHH AON
00'868'9£$
00'868'S£5
WnIWHHd dZHH Z6/166T
00'699$
00'6SS$
LNHWHSHfIUWIaH
NOIldIHDSHQ HSVHDHnd
HOONHA
HSNHdXH SWIVZO Qd SdHS
+IV'SZT'Z$
Tb'9ZT'Z$
H3IZ T6 AON
00'09$
00'09$
ZH OO S3HQNV SHDIAH3S
*vZ'SS8'S9$
bb'68$'9T$
O£ OT nHHi. SWIvnD Q3W
ZOHdSOHd ZNIIOW dO HDV`IZIA
66'609'6Z5
T6/tZZOT num SWIv'ID QHW
T£'L9£'9S
16/VT/0T nHHi SWIv`ID QHW
16.818'8$
WnIWHHd SSOq SSHDX3
00.0£6$
SHH3 NIWOB RSQV AON
V9 6v9'£$
SHH3 NOILVHSSINIWQH AON
00'TTb$
00'TTbS
ONINNVO SHDIAHHS
'Q'W 'HHAZIS 'q QZVNOH
HHOH ZHIHOWHN NHalSHMHIHON
AZ2nOv3 ZHOIQHW NHHSSHMHZHON
'D'S'DOSSH ADOROIQKH SSHMHZHON
ZvSIdSOH AZINnWWOD SSHMHSHON
'OHS gdWH 30 HOSDHHIQ SIONIZZI
SIONIZZI OWH
gOOd 'HVIO SSHDXH g3AHq-HDIH
DNI S3DIAH39 SSHNISnH HvO
'DNI 'SHDIAH3S SS3NISn9 Hy!)
HDNvHnSNI Hdln NHOHmO iHOd
'Q'W 'O3NHOD 'A VQIYHOZ
QZHI3xOOH8
HSNHO ZVDIQHW SHHHZOHS NVIXHgy
lNHWHOHNHW NSIH
99'908'Z$
QNn3 ZKHHNHO
99'908'ZS
+*nHSOs*
HOI3d0 S�xHHZO HOVZZIA
£0'88$
£0'868$
SHQOD HOH`IgIA S SNIHdHH
'DNI 'SHHI3IQOD ONIZHHyS
S£'£OS'T$
OS'S01$
HOVd ZSOHZ
0£'£95
HOVd IIHO32
LO'8TO'T$
IdodHH SHHHnSHHHs HSInHnd
3DI3dO S,xHHZD HOHZZIA
ZHSOZ
ZNnOWH HDIOANI
NOIldIHDSHQ HSVHDHnd
HOONHA
T6/T£JOT HIVQ SNHWAHd
SHOdHH 2YAOHddV HZHHAVd SSNnOODV
01 39Hd
ZOHdSOHd ZNIIOW dO HDV`IZIA
VENDOR
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%31191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$122,126.65
INVOICE AMOUNT
***TOTAL**
PAGE 11
TOTAL
$122,126.65
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
A.S.S.E.
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC.
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE
IAFSM
MORBIDITY & MORTALITY REPORT
NAT'L. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
NATIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PROF. ENGI
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MEMBERSHIP HANNEMAN
$54.00
$99.00
$54.00
REGISTER BENCIC
$89`00
REGISTER WULBEKER
$89.00
REGISTER FUITH
REGISTER MAYCHSZAK
$89.00
$366.00
PEST CONTROL
$55.00
$55.00
PEST CONTROL
$55.00
PEST CONTROL
$55.00
PEST CONTROL
WELLER CREEK SERVICES
$260.00
$.00
$480.00
$$55.00
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$55.00
$55
$55.00
STICKERS
REGISTER VEMMER
$72.00
$40.00
$72.00
$40.00*
REGISTER WULBECKER VANDORNICK
$46.00
$46.00
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
REGISTER ERB BLDG TEST
$75.00
$75.00
$150.00*
REGISTER JAKES
NEHA CERTIFICATION RENEWAL
$45.00
$198.00
$45.00
$198.00
92 MEMBER RENEWAL BENCIC
$8.79
EXPENSES
$17.38
EXPENSES
$18.00
EXPENSES
$ 20.79
EXPENSES
.
$5.63
$563
MISC EXPENSES
$12.86
MISC EXPENSES
$12.10
MISC EXPENSES
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ACTIVE LOCK & KEY LTD.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$192.00
$760.00
PAGE 12
ADVANCED OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$159.36
$159.36
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
$163.84
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE_ AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
AEl CAMERA REPAIRED
$65.00
$64.80
$65.00*
$64.80
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE,
MISC EXPENSES
$15.32
$110.87*
PROSAFETY
RAINCOATS & HOODS
$312.00
$312.00
QUALEX, INC.
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$53.95
$10.00
$53.95
$10.00
STATE TREASURER OF ILLINOIS
MANUAL 754 MICE FEE
$360.00
$360.00
STEEL STRUCTURES TECH. CEN.INC
REGISTRATIONS
$7.00
$7.00
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
PUBLICATION
$1,134.00
$1,134.00
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS
$140.1?
$140.17
XEROX CORP.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
MICE CHARGE
OCTOBER MICE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$3,827.03
GENERAL FUND
$3,827.03
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ACTIVE LOCK & KEY LTD.
LABOR TO DRILL OPEN SAFE
$192.00
$760.00
$192.00
$760.00
ADVANCED OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.
SVCE AGREEMENT
$159.36
$159.36
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
PARTS
SUPPLIES
$163.84
SUPPLIES
$111.63
$275.47
CANON USA
AEl CAMERA REPAIRED
$65.00
$64.80
$65.00*
$64.80
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE,
DONUTS LAW ENFORCE SHOW
REPAIR DAMAGES TO P-14
$263.10
$263.10
CHICAGO SUN -TIMES, INC.
POLICE OFFICER AD
$294.00
$32.50
$294.00
$32.50
CLASSLINE, INC.
COMPUSERVE, INC
POCKET ID BADGE
COMPUTER SERVICE INFO
$10.00
$10.00
COMPUTERLAND
MISC DISKETTES
$35.00
$704.00
$35.00
$704.00
KEVIN J. CONDON
JOHN DAHLBERG
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
$271.79
$271.79
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
SERVICE CALL FAX MACHINE
$37.50
$37.50
FRIES AUTO INC.
FUEL
$27.31
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
DAILY HERALD
HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY
ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS LAW ENFORCEMENT
INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF CHIEFS
MAUREEN KERRIGAN
KREST UNIFORMS, INC.
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LAW ADVISORY GOVT. ED., INC.
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1031%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FUEL
FUEL
FUEL
SEPT 91 CAR WASHING
ANIMAL HANDLING GLOVES
FILM PROCESSING
MICE & COPIES
MTCE & COPIES
MTCE & COPIES
SUBSCRIPTION
PRINT HEAD
DUES PAVLOCK DALEY RICHARDSON
SERVICE
SERVICE
SUBSCRIPTION
REGISTRATIONS
EXPENSES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
TUITION NAGEL
FILM
FILM
SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$25.14
$24.00
$23.00
$425.50
$136.57
$85.11
$242.83
$139.15
$142.61
$148.20
$175.00
$275.00
$12.36
$404.94
$22.00
$150.00
$18.00
$114.40
$131.67
$12.13
$93.05
$60.31
$71.41
$285.94
$313.39
$68.48
$12.13
$95.00
$109.98
$438.00
$64.23
$29.79
$30.00
$30.00
$30.00
$6.98
PAGE 13
TOTAL
$99.45
$425.50
$136.57
$85.11
$524.59
$148.20
$175.00
$275.00
$417.30
$22.00
$150.00
$18.00
$114.40
$1,048.51
$95.00
$547.98
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
THOMAS A. LOPOTKO
MINUTEMAN PRESS
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
HARRY MOSER
MPD, INC.
RAY O'HERRON CO., INC.
ORDER FROM HORDER
RONALD W. PAVLOCK
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
ERIC E. PIEE
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
QUALEX, INC.
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
R & M BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC
RAPP'S
WILLIAM ROSCOP
SAVE -A -PET
SECRETARY OF STATE
SHAW-BARTON
THE SIGN PALACE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10131/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
4.60
SUPPLIES
$93.29
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$111.71
$53.28
$453.88
EXPENSES
$88.94
$88.94
BUSINESS CARDS
OCT TACTICAL UNIT CAR
$64.00
$100.00
$64.00
$100.00
PARTS
36.15
PARTS
$35.00
$71.15
EXPENSES
$79.78
$79.78
BATTERY
$18.48
$18.48
HANDCUFFS
$59.85
$59.85
SUPPLIES
$53.35
$53.35
EXPENSES
$375.05
$375.05
MISC EXPENSES
$5.75
MISC EXPENSES
$79.44
MISC EXPENSES
$50.00
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$15.00
$20.00
$170.19*
RADIO REPAIRS.
RADIO REPAIRS
$323.00
$800.00
$1,123.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$65.75
$65.75
AUG/SEPT91 STRAYS
$1,364.00
$1,364.00
SUPPPLIES
$89.79
$89.79
CONTACT SHEET
$4.45
$4.45
MEDIATION REPORTS
$346.50
ARREST REPORTS
OFFICERS DAILY REPORT
$138.40
$218.05
$702.95
CREDIT CAD RIBBONS
$40.52 -
52.88
$12.36
CAD RIBBONS
BRAKE PADS
$68.80
$268.80
EXPENSES
$97.14
$97.14
AUG%SEPT 91 STRAYS
$945.00
$945.00
LICENSE RENEWALS
$144.00
$144.00
MCGRUFF CALENDARS
$194.14
$194.14
COMM SVCE VEHICLE LETTERED
$225.00
$225.00
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ALWAYS YOGURT
AMERICAN FIRE JOURNAL
DON ANDERSON
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
ARTISTIC
SPLIT KEY RING
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
EMP RECOGNITION RECEPTION
PAGE 15
SUBSCRIPTION
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
EXPENSES
$128.63
EXPENSES
PAYMENT DATE 10/31%91
SSERVICE
31.30
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
$97.14
CREDIT TEE SHIRTS
$174.93-
ROBERT SMITH
EXPENSES
$20.00
$500.00
$20.00
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TUITION -GROSS
$400.00
TUITION STEINER
TUITION GIBSON/RIORDAN
$1,200.00
$2,100.00
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBA
TUITION SMITH,ROBERT
$415.00
$34.45
$415.00
$34.45
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
AUGUST 91 FEES & FOOD
$47.00
$47.00
JOHN R. WAGNER
WICKLANDER-ZULAWSKI & ASSOC.
EXPENSES
TUITION
$1,080.00
$1,080.00
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
RADIATORS
$298.00
$75.00
$373.00
NORMA WITHEY
RADIATOR
EXPENSES
$33.25
$65.20
$33.25
$65.20
XL/DATACOMP INC.
OCTOBER MTCE SERVICE
PAINT P-10
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$19,386.08
GENERAL FUND
$19,386.08
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ALWAYS YOGURT
AMERICAN FIRE JOURNAL
DON ANDERSON
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
ARTISTIC
SPLIT KEY RING
$16.33
EMP RECOGNITION RECEPTION
$200.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$19.95
EXPENSES
$128.63
EXPENSES
$60.00
SSERVICE
31.30
LINEN
$155.38
LINEN SERVICE
$132.47
LINEN SERVICE
$97.14
CREDIT TEE SHIRTS
$174.93-
CLOTHING
751.05
CLOTHING
$1$902.01
$16.33
$200.00
$19.95
$219.93
$384.99
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ASEPTIC CONTROL PRODUCTS, INC.
BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CHARTERHOUSE PUBLISHING CO.
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE,
CITGO PETROLEUM CORPORATION
HENRY DAWSON
DAY -TIMERS, INC.
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
FIRE DEPT. SAFETY OFCRS. ASSN.
FIREHOUSE
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
IGE, INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS AUTO CENTRAL
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
KAR PRODUCTS INC
KREST UNIFORMS, INC.
ALAN LABBE
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MAC TOOLS
MAC WAREHOUSE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10131/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLOTHING
$244.20
TEE SHIRTS
$260.95
$2,983.28
SUPPLIES
$118.52
$118.52
2 DAY PLANNERS
$28.54
$28.54
SERVICE
$205.36
$205.36
TIME & PAY RECORDS
$23.48
$23.48
SERVICE
SERVICE
$94.50
$61.50
$156.00
LEASE AGREEMENT
$12.00
$12.00
3 SWIMMING POOLS
$41.79
$41.79
SUPPLIES 4325047-001
$86.09
$86.09
FAX PAPER
SERVICE CALL FAX MACHINE
$42.00
$37.50
$79.50
PARTS
8.33
PARTS
$15.47
$23.80
MEMBER RENEWAL KORDECKI
$60.00
$60.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$21.97
$21.97
SEPT 91 CAR WASHING
$12.00
$12.00
MTCE & COPIES
$139.16
MICE & COPIES
$142.62
$281.78
CYLINDER OXYGEN
$19.00
$19.00
AIR RIDE SEAT
$395.58
$395.58
SERVICE
$192.14
SERVICE
$75.08
SERVICE
$12.36
SERVICE
$50.60
SERVICE
$24.10
SERVICE
$22.14
$376.42
SUPPLIES
$165.91
$165.91
BADGES
$346.50
CREDIT BADGES
$10.01-
$336.49
EXPENSES
$17.75
$17.75
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$251.64
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$71.52
$323.16
TOOLS
$67.00
$67.00
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$292.00
$292.00
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
MED MODE, INC.
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS
MT. PROSPECT GOLF CLUB
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
THOMAS O'NEILL
PAGE AMERICA
ALLEN POWELL
QUALEX, INC.
TERRY REINLEIN
SECRETARY OF STATE
SIANA BAKERY
SPRING ALIGN
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
DENNIS THILL - F.D.
TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$148.10
$148.10
EQUIPMENT
$601.70
$601.70
PLAQUES
$183.48
$183.48
BATTERY CHARGERS
$2,289.00
$2,289.00
ROOM RENTAL 2 HRS
$16.00
$16.00
PARTS
$32.38
PARTS
$33.82
PARTS
$28.48
PARTS
$90.28
PARTS
$13.50
PARTS
$73.31
PARTS
$40.18
PARTS
$25.02
PARTS
$31.60
PARTS
$28.48 -
PARTS
$5.78
PARTS
$18.21
PARTS
$15.00
PARTS
$56.01
PARTS
$24.11
PARTS
$8.78
PARTS
$35.28
$503.26
3 VISITS SEPT 91
$294.00
$294.00
EXPENSES
$215.20
$215.20
SERVICE
$341.51
$341.51
SERVICES
$298.00
$298.00*
SUPPLIES
$90.00
SUPPLIES
27.18
$26.19
SUPPLIES
$143.37
EXPENSES 10/28-11/01
$400.00
$400.00*
LICENSE RENEWALS
$48.00
$48.00
DONUTS FAE CLASS
$76.19
$76.19
PARTS
$36.62
$36.62
SOFTWARE
$24.00
$24.00
REGISTRATION
$60.00
$60.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$92.22
$92.22
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
U. S. AUTO GLASS CENTER, INC.
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INSTALL WINDSHIELD
INVOICE AMOUNT
$225.66
***TOTAL**
PAGE 18
TOTAL
$225.66
$12,964.93
$10,608.93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $2,356.00
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
MKM DISTRIBUTORS 9-1-1 LABELS $476.34 $476.34
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS NOVEMBER SERVICES RENDERED $27,410.00 $27,410.00
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $27,886.34
GENERAL FUND
$27,886.34
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $45.08 $45.08
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $13.12
MISC EXPENSES $5.00
MISC EXPENSES $18.00 $36.12*
THE SALVATION ARMY 2ND BUDGET ALLOCATION $1,875.00 $1,875.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,956.20
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC. INSTALL 2 STROBE/HORNS $220.00 $220.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $38.49
SUPPLIES $5.06
SUPPLIES $18.65
SUPPLIES $40.61
SUPPLIES $20.74
SUPPLIES $55.08
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$1,956.20
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
PUBLICATION
$34.34
$16.00
$50.34
PATRICIA BRUHL
LICATION
CDBG 818 DRESSER
$478.17
$750.00
$478.17
$750.00
DURA SHIELD WATERPROOFING CO.
KA.M. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
CDBG 14 S OWEN
CDBG 1 N LANCASTER
$3,305.00
$3,305.00
W..LOCKWOOD MARTLING
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
$2,050.05
$2,050.05
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EXPENSES
$13.00
$2.12
EXPENSES
7.83
MISCNEXPENSES
$11.52
MISC EXPENSES
$4.11
$38.58*
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
HEALTH CARE SERVICE
$1,333.33
$1,333.33
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$8,005.47
GENERAL FUND
$2,136.85 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$5,868.62
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC. INSTALL 2 STROBE/HORNS $220.00 $220.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $38.49
SUPPLIES $5.06
SUPPLIES $18.65
SUPPLIES $40.61
SUPPLIES $20.74
SUPPLIES $55.08
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1031%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
SUPPLIES
$12.55
SUPPLIES
$63.60
SUPPLIES
$47.02
SUPPLIES
$19.49
SUPPLIES
$7.20
SUPPLIES
$5.98
$27.48
SUPPLIES
$5.98
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$99.66
$467.59
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
$38.07
$12.69
FILTERS
$6.90
$57.66
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
MATERIALS
$1,212.00
217.20
MATERIALS
MATERIALS
$393.50
$1,822.70
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
COMMON CABLE
$32.83
$114.00
$32.83
$114.00
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
SERVICE CALL
SUPPLIES
$96.89
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
SUPPLIES
$163.84
SUPPLIES
$38.09
SUPPLIES
$126.67
$111.62
$537.11
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
SUPPLIES
SERVICE HINGES
$103.75
$977.86
SERVICE
$84.50
CABLE
REPAIR BROKEN CHAIN
$58.00
$567.00
$1,224.11
$567.00
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
C A CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
COPIER PAPER
S/C SIDEWALK PROGRAM
$6,739.87
$10,747.58
$17,487.45
SfC SIDEWALK PROGRAM
36.75
$36.75
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CENTURY LABS/PRO CLEAN, INC.
SEERVICE
SUPPLIES
$ 57.34
$258.00
$357.34
$258.00
CHEMLAWN
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
LAWN POWER SEEDING
WATER USAGE
$74.27
$731.89
$74.27
CITRON CHEMICAL, INC.
CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
$96.00
`
CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
$144.00
$971.89
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
DOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
FINISHMASTER, INC.
FIRE CONTROL, INC.
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC.
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO
JAMES W. GAGES
PETER GALLOS
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
HELLER LUMBER CO.
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE
NELS J. JOHNSON
KAR PRODUCTS INC
CHARLES KLEHM & SON NURSERY
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$179.60
SUPPLIES
$316.45
$496.05
JANITORIAL SVCE 10/01-31
$1,796.00
$1,796.00
BF80-JT-17006
$163.57
$163.57
REPAIR OVERHEAD DOOR
REPAIR OVERHEAD DOOR
$441.58
$214.94
$656.52
PAINTING SUPPLIES
$8.30
$8.30
INSPECTIONS
INSPECTIONS
$200.00
$250.00
$450.00
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$58.85
$36.17
$95.02
SEPT 91 CAR WASHING
$49.90
$49.90
UNIFORM SERVICE
$171.68
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
$147.75
$147.75
$467.18
S/C SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
$70.00
$70.00
SjC SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
$35.00
$35.00
PAAINT
$44.59
$44.59
TIRES
$258.24
$258.24
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
$1,232.00
REPAIR DETECTOR LOOPS
$2,901.30
REPAIR TRAFFIC SIGNAL
$1,358.90
REPAIR SIGNAL
$4,100.20
REPAIR SIGNALS
$626.00
REPAIR SIGNAL HEAD
SIGNAL REPAIRS
$142.00
$1,075.85
$11,436.25
LUMBER SUPPLIES
$44.90
$28.34
$44.90
$28.34
SUPPLIES
TURF MOWING
$3,072.00
SERVICES-HOFF CORP
$3,010.00
$6,082.00*
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
PARKWAY TREE TRIMMING
$9,745.00
$5,884.00
$15,629.00
CREDIT PARTS
$40.83-
$40.83
WHITE FIR TREE
$215.00
$215.00
PARTS
$45.35
PARTS
$6.68
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
PARTS
$60.85
PARTS
$15.00
PARTS
.57
ADDTL RENTAL CHGS
$277.74
$406.19
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$588.28
4.00
PARTS
PARTS
$50.37
$642.65
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$5.79
$5.75
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$28.95
SUPPLIES
$26.15
$66.64
MATERIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
MATERIALS
$934.53
$1,011.91
$934.53
ROGER MEYER
MATERIAL & HAULING
MATERIAL & HAULING
$1,850.00
MATERIALZHAULING 8Z5-9212
$90.00
MATERIAL HAULING 8f5-912
$2,277.00
$5,228.91
$105.00
WESLEY MICHAKZYK
S�C SIDEWALK REPLACEME T
$105.00
$39.99
$39.99
MOUNT PROSPECT LAWNMOWER
S OOL WEED TRIMMER LINE
$116.00
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
SERVICES RENDERED
SERVICES RENDERED
$507.36
$623.36
NELSON-HARKINS INDUSTRIES
SIGN MAKING MATERIAL
$1,875.00
$203.63
$1,875.00
$203.63
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1601 W GOLF RD
$40.15
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$35.00
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$50.50
SUPPLIES
$168.70
SUPPLIES
$29.77
SUPPLIES
$5.66
SUPPLIES
$466.12
SUPPLIES
$27.78
SUPPLIES
$26.94
LIGHT BULBS
$49.60
$900.22
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
REGISTRATION DORSEY
$50.00
$11.50
$50.00
P & W INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.
PARTS
$67.14
PARTS
PARTS
$82.66
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PIP PRINTING
RAYMAR HYDRAULIC REPAIR SERVIC
REGION 5 SALES & SERVICE, INC.
RIC MAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
ROSEMONT GARDENS INC.
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
STANTON POWER RODDING
STATE TREASURER
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
WILLIAMSON NURSERY & ASSOC., I
WIPECO INC
STREET DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10131/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
$32.14
$193.44
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$79.03
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$4.53
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$85.55
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$43.50
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$8.03
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$8.64
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$133.50
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.80
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$70.50
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$19.76
$459.84*
TRIP TICKETS
$202.95
$202.95
HYDRAULIC MOTOR
$239.86
$239.86
TOOLS
$269.90
$269.90
QUIK WASH
$124.00
$124.00
SOD
$66.50
$66.50
MTCE SUPPLIES
$170.68
MTCE SUPPLIES
$216.67
$387.35
THERMOSTAT WRENCH
$6.72
$6.72
SUPPLIES
$100.06
SUPPLIES
$29.44
$129.50
CATCH/BASIN/INLET CLNG
$265.00
$265.00
VILLAGGE SHARE COSTS
MIGWIRE SPOOL
$32,631.88
$71.84
$32,631.88
$71.84
CURB REPLACEMENT
$3,212.50
$3,212.50
MOBILE
$665.00
$665.00
TREE TRANSPLANTS
$75.00
$75.00
POLO RAGS
$397.50
$397.50
***TOTAL**
$112,688.63
GENERAL FUND $67,020.97 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND _ $44,068.13
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10131/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $1,599.53
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ABM, INC.
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN.
B & H INDUSTRIES
BADGER METER INC
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CHARTERHOUSE PUBLISHING CO
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
R. L. CORTY & COMPANY
DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC.
E & H UTILITY SALES
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FINISHMASTER, INC.
FULLER'S CARWASH DES PLAINES
XEROX IMAGING CARTRIDGES
$58.00
$58.00
SUPPLIES
8.60
$6.75
$15.35
SUPPLIES
PARTS
$92.16
$92.16
DUES WEEKS%ANDLER
$664.00
$92.00
$756.00*
REGISTRATION FEES
$9.90SUPPIES
XEROX BOND COPIES
$24.78
$34.68
RCDLLASSY REG 2 &-3
$250.69
2 COMPOUND METERS
$2,085.80
WATER METER
$958.49
$4,900.32
WATER METERS
WATER METERS
$1,916.98
$10,112.28
SUPPLIES
$96.89
SUPPLIES
$
SUPPLIES
126.67
$111.62
$499.02
SUPPLIES
FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS
$43.50
$43.50
$87.00
FLOWER ARRANGEMENTS
$567.00
$567.00
COPIER PAPER
SERVICE
$36.75
$36.75
TIME & PAY RECORDS
$23.66
$23.66
SUPPLIES
$12`45
$186.25
$198.70
SUPPLIES
BJ80-JT-23598
$3,387.87
$3 387.87
SUPPLIES
$345.00
345.00
PULVERIZED TOPSOIL
$560.00
$415.64
$560.00
$415.64
CHAIN CUTTER
DELIVERIES
$31.00
$31.00
PAINTING SUPPLIES
$7.87
$20.00
$7'87
$20.00
SEPT 91 CAR WASHING
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 25
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
$171.67
$147.75
UNIFORM SERVICE
$
$8$676.28
$467.17
$$,693.00
MARIO GAMBINO LANDSCAPING INC
RESTORATION
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TZRESAY
TIRES
$258'24
$934'52
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
SIGNAL HANDHOLE REPLACEMENT
$1,456.74
$71.37
$1,456.74
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
WATER METER LABOR
$271.37
WATER METER LABOR
$7195
$
WATER METER LABOR
$285.48
WATER METER LABOR
WATER METER LABOR
$261.69
WATER METER LABOR
$214.11
$600.00
$1,237.08
$600.00
HARCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION
REPAIRS
SUBSCRIPTION
$148.20
$148.20
DAILY HERALD
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$32'73
$203'83
SERVICE
$533'12
SERVICE
$37'57
SERVICE
$30`63
SERVICE
$30'63
SERVICE
$61'25
SERVICE
$30'63
SERVICE
$97.32
SERVICE
$60'67
SERVICE
$16'99
SERVICE
$16'98
SERVICE
$23`50
SERVICE
$17'24
SERVICE
$17'23
SERVICE
$48'37
SERVICE
$17.71
$1,276.40
ILLINOIS SAFETY COUNCIL
SERVICE
REGISTER MCINTOSH
$25.00
$171.69
$25'00*
JULIE, INC.
SEPT 91 CHARGES
SEPT 91 CHARGES
$12.64
$184.33
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
KAR PRODUCTS INC
LAND AND LAKES CO
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION
ROGER MEYER
MUNICIPAL MARKING DISTRIBUTORS
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
NET MIDWEST, INC.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CREDIT PARTS
$40.83®
$40.83
REFUSE DISPOSAL CREDIT
$174.00 -
$1,146-00
$972-00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$364.25
CAR RENTAL
CAR RENTAL
$449.50
$813.75
PARTS
$45.36
$2.50
PARTS
PARTS
$37.85
$Q5 .-71
ANTI -STATIC CHAIR MAT
$161.64
$30.03
$191.67
ENVELOPES
AUTOCAD SUPPORT
$120.00
$120.00
MATERIAL & HAULING
MATERIAL/HAULING 8/5-9/12
$289-00
$583.38
MATERIAL/HAULING 8/5-9Z12
$416.70
$142.32
$1,289.08
�142.32
PAINT
MTCE SUPPLIES
$917.00
$917.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
CREDIT MTCE SUPPLIES
$225.00 -
$225.00-
CREDIT MTCE SUPPLIES
$370.50
MTCE SUPPLIES
$370.50
$2,125.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
WATER SAMPLES TESTED
$112.50
$112.50
NS E KENSINGTON 1E RAND
$19.42
$39.48
$58.90
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
$66.24
SUPPLIES
$25.48
$91.72
SUPPLIES
LEGAL NOTICES
$69.30
$20.00
$89.30
LEGAL NOTICE
$.50
$.50
EXPENSES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
.
$17 $2.4348
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$45.00
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$17.19
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$71.18
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$15.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$45.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
PIP PRINTING
PLAZA CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
POSTMASTER
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
RAPP'S
RIC MAR INDUSTRIES, INC.
ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO.
ROUTE 12 RENTAL CO., INC.
RTP - SUBURBAN
SECRETARY OF STATE
SENTRY ENVELOPE CO.
SERVALL ENGINEERING CO.
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
TECH SYN CORPORATION
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TLC CONTROLS INC.
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
WIPECO INC
ZIEBART
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 27
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.81
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$105.93
$321.02*
TRIP TICKETS
$202.95
$202.95
CONCRETE RESTORATION
$2,142.25
CONCRETE RESTORATION
$270.00
$2,412.25
WATER BILLS POSTAGE
$755.75
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$807.38
$1,563.13*
FILM PROCESSING
$10.49
FILM PROCESSING
$20.98
$31.47
BATTERY
$76.43
$76.43
QUIK WASH
$124.00
$124.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$152.35
$152.35
LAWN AERATOR RENTAL
$64.00
$64.00
MTCE CHARGE
$21.00
MTCE CHARGE
$42.00
MTCE CHARGE
$42.00
MTCE CONTRACT PUBLIC WORKS
$126.00
QUARTERLY MTCE
$488.25
$719.25
LICENSE RENEWALS
$48.00
$48.00
ENVELOPES
$1,174.48
$1,174.48
SERVICED IMPACT WRENCH
$18.83
$18.83
MTCE SUPPLIES
$20.59
$20.59
SUPPLIES
$46.19
$46.19
MIGWIRE SPOOL
$71.84
$71.84
CONTROLL PANEL
$1,766.00
$1,766.00
MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
$7.90
MISC ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES
$22.48
$30.38
RADIATOR
$316.00
$316.00
POLO RAGS
$397.50
$397.50
ALL STAR BEDLINER CAPS
$3.50
$3.50
SUPPLIES
$780.00
$780.00
***TOTAL**
$48,662.20
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 28
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER & SEWER FUND $48,662.20
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH66-JT-0498-A
$22.14
$9.03
BH66-JT-3710-A
BH66-JT-5262-A
$327.75
BH66-JT-5266-C
$211.56
BH68-JT-7498-A
$22.14
$592.62
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
$47.16
$95.00
$47.16
$95.00
WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO.
1 DAY FLOOR PLANER RENTAL
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$734.78
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$734.78
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
EQUITY CHARGE
$5,490.04
$5,490.04
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$5,490.04
GENERAL FUND
$5,490.04
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC. TRAILER RENTAL $230.00
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
ARLINGTON PLATING COMPANY
BRISTOL COURT INC.
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FINISHMASTER, INC.
P J HARTMANN COMPANY
HELLER LUMBER CO.
HENRICKSEN
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
KANE GRAPHICAL CORPORATION
KAR PRODUCTS INC
KOCH & SON LANDSCAPING, INC.
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ORDER FROM HORDER
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 29
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10%31%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
TRAILER RENTAL
$230.00
TRAILER RENTAL
$200.00
$4560.00
SUPPLIES
$230.78
SUPPLIES
$182.34"
SUPPLIES
$10.71
BUILDING SUPPLIES
$24.65
$83.80
PARTS
$123.70
PARTS
$123.70
$247.40
KEYS & LOCKS
$314.63
$314.63
CEREMONY SHOVELS PLATED
$550.00
$550.00
REFUND ALARM SYSTEM CABLE
$127.60
$127.60
SUPPLIES
$17$.33
SUPPLIES
$41.24
$217.57
ENVELOPES GROUNDBREAKING
$100.01
$100.01
SERVICES RENDERED
$10,780.08
$10,780.08
PAINTING SUPPLIES
$79.76
$79.76
SOIL ANALYSES
$2,131.25
$2,131.25
LUMBER SUPPLIES
LUMBER SUPPLIES
$44.80
$14.72
$59.52
OFFICE FURNITURE
$2,817.40
$2,817.40
MOVE PHONE SYSTEM
$100.00
$100.00
VINYL LETTERING ON WINDOW
$55.88
$55.88
PARTS
$52.67
PARTS
$52.67
$105.34
LANDSCAPING
$600.00
$600.00
SUPPLIES
$49.10
$49.10
P6 SQUAD CONVERSION
$992.90
Pll SQUAD CONVERSION
$966.05
P-12 SQUAD CONVERSION
$907.60
P9 SQUAD CONVERSION
$860.10
$3,726.65
PLAQUES
$990.50
$990.50
SUPPLIES
$59.44
$59.44
PAPER
$35.04
PAPER
$35.04
$70.08
SEPT LEGAL SERVICES
$954.91
$954.91
TRUCK MTD SEWER CLNG UNIT
$85,941.85
$85,941.85
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 30
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$28,530.29
$2,030.00
$30,560.29
THE SIGN PALACE
PROSPECT HIGH REVIEW
2 PLYWOOD SIGNS
$500.00
$500.00
BARRY A. SPRINGER
SEPT 91 LEGAL SERVICES
SEPT 91 LEGAL SERVICES
$67.50
$1,147.50
$1,215.00
SZABO CONTRACTING
PHASE 1 CLEARWATER
$16,383.60
$100.00
$16,383.60
$100.00*
TREASURER, STATE OF ILLINOIS
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
100 IEPA MANIFESTS
AUGUST 91 FEES & FOOD
$50.00
$50.00
DOROTHY WADE
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
$188.40
$528.80
$188.40
$528.80
JEREMIAH J. WALSH
WILLIAMSON NURSERY & ASSOC., I
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
TREE TRANSPLANTS
$876.00
$876.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$161,224.86
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$90,378.01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
CONST 1991
$2,884.90
$2,702.41
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$33,106.05 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT
FLOOD CONTROL CONSTR FUND
$32,153.49
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
$9.42
$162.54
$9.42
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BG21-JT-1838-A
BH67-JT-3858-B
$48.50
$211.04
FOLDERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
FLAG INSTALLATION
$682.00
$225.00
INSTALL & REMOVE BANNERS
BANNER REPLACEMENTS
$1,530.00
$2,437.00
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
SUPPLIES
$89.61
$98.75
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$110.18
SUPPLIES
$113.50
$412.04
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI
3RD BUDGET ALLOC
$2,875.00
$17.80
$2,875.00
$17.80
MOUNT PKOSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
BRSS PLATE W%ENGRAVING
VENDOR
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
$6,009.56
PAGE 31
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$47.26 $47.26
***TOTAL** $6,009.56
$1,663,717.92
DATE RUN 10/31/91
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 32
ID-APPBAR
TIME RUN 12.26,58
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING
FUND 10/31/91
SUMMARY BY
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$995,586.87
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$44,068.13
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$9,193.15
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$10,648.97
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$125,796.52
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$2,261.44
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$90,378.01
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$122,165.65
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$6,840.43
53
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$33,106.05
56
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$74,086.56
58
FLOOD CONTROL CONSTR FUND
$32,153.49
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$42,299.07
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$44,567.93
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$30,565.65
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,663,717.92
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
PROJECT RED RIBBON
WHEREAS, 62 people are killed each day on our nation's highways
in alcohol-related crashes, compared to 76 people per day 10
years ago; and
WHEREAS, drunk driving claims the lives of more than 22,415
Americans each year; and
WHEREAS, September 5, 1991 marked 11 year anniversary of Mothers
Against Drunk Driving -- an observance dedicated to the more
than 22,000 needless victims of drunk driving crashes in the
United States each year; and
WHEREAS, an estimated 39,000 lives have been saved during the
past decade due to the fight against drunk driving; and
WHEREAS, thousands of volunteers across the country have
dedicated countless hours to providing support for victims and
preventing further drunk driving tragedies; and
WHEREAS, MADD and its members and supporters pledge to continue
diligent efforts in the next decade and beyond as they say,
"We're In It For Lives;" and
WHEREAS, MADD is asking Americans to tie a red ribbon to a
visible location on their vehicles as a symbol that you join
Mothers Against Drunk Driving in its hope for a safe and sober
holiday season; and
WHEREAS, MADD is asking citizens to "Tie One on For Safety," by
participating in PROJECT RED RIBBON, a national holiday public
awareness program; and
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim November 17, 1991 through
January 5, 1992 as MADD'S PROJECT RED RIBBON, "Tie One On For
Safety." and urge all citizens of our community to help make the
holidays safer by driving sober this holiday season and
throughout the year.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 5th day of November, 1991.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-57-A-91, ZBA-58-SU-91, WALGREEN COMPANY
LOCATION: 1028 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
the following requests:
1. Amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite
antennas as a Special Use in the B-1 Shopping Center District
2. Special Use Permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow installation of a roof -
mounted satellite antenna.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 26,
1991. At the meeting Robert Silverman, Attorney for Walgreen Company, explained that
they would like to install a 6 ft. diameter satellite antenna on the roof of Walgreens in Golf
Plaza 11 Shopping Center. The satellite antenna would link this store to Walgreen's nation-
wide prescription network and it could also be used for in-store management of inventories.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that currently the B-1 Zoning District does not allow non -
ground mounted satellite antennas. The proposed text amendment would add standards
specific to non -ground mounted antennas which would regulate height, size and screening.
Ms. Farnham noted that there are very few properties zoned B-1 in the Village and that
they are developed with uses typical of the B-3 District, which allows non -ground mounted
satellite antennas as a special use.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that this item was continued from
the last meeting to clarify the specific language of the amendment. Members stated that
the language proposed by staff satisfied their concerns. The proposed wording is the same
as is found in the B-3 District, thus, the amendment is consistent with existing provisions for
satellite antennas.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of an
amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a
special use in the B-1 Shopping Center District as proposed by staff.
Also by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a Special Use
permit to allow installation of a 6 ft. diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna at Walgreens
at 1028 South Elmhurst Road.
DMC:hg
egoirro:
e•u.s1
a
Al ILWA Wt of lqn WlGll/Ili
ef,'*b I (3nr�tc
PLAN
WALGREENS' ANTENNA
59. Ra.
ucj�, da lO'j
ow.; i -4, - a
Rwl•lon.
Add— (aZb PtavfN f -l- utz - –
ILL��OIH GOC�iri
L
Al ILWA Wt of lqn WlGll/Ili
ef,'*b I (3nr�tc
PLAN
WALGREENS' ANTENNA
59. Ra.
ucj�, da lO'j
ow.; i -4, - a
Rwl•lon.
Add— (aZb PtavfN f -l- utz - –
ILL��OIH GOC�iri
I AN 3 t 199t
r7
-t
9idp. Cod•: I°It"Gc-
8d.. Typ.:
RIVA KLEIN & PARTNERS
STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS`'
191+ S.W. 72nd. AVE. MIAMI , FLORIDA 33115
(305) 661-0310
AIS DWEN910N9 TO BE FIELD
YEFUFIEd BY GONTRACTOR
i
1 Walgreens a
FRONT ELEVATION
r
I Erl
REAR ELEVATION
Pns�•c1:-... Slt• Ne.
WALGREENS' ANTENNA uy�-ovla�
Dow: i -z - A- ` -10
RMN•nx
I'j
JAN J 1 1991
Anl '� �g,V
D••Ipn: b4 t'1 f� FI i
3fbl:
pldp C.d.:
_ f(
RIVA KLEIN
& PARTNERS
STRUCTURAL
ENGINEERS
Y
11
4014S.W. 72nd. AVE. MIAMI FLORIDA 331»
(3D3) pp1-0310
,
,ZgR 59- V-9/
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 57-A-91 Hearing Date: September 26, 1991
58_S1,7_9 I
PETITIONER: Walgreen Company
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1028 S. Elmhurst Road
PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 1991
REQUEST: Amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2
to allow non -ground mounted
satellite antennas as a special
use in the B -I Shopping Center
District. Special Use permit
per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow
installation of a roof -mounted
satellite antenna.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that this Case
has been continued from the August 22, 1991 Zoning Board of
Appeals meeting. Chairman Basnik stated that the petitioner
is requesting an amendment to Section 14.1.701.C.2 to allow
non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the
B-1 Shopping Center Districts. Also requested is a Special
Use permit per Section 14.1701.0.2 to allow installation of a
roof mounted satellite antenna.
The petitioner, Robert Silverman, senior attorney for
Walgreen Company, presented his case stating that they would
like to install a roof top satellite antenna for integrated
health care. Mr. Silverman stated that this case was
continued upon request of the Zoning Board for specific
language.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that by request of the Zoning Board of Appeals this
case has been continued to clarify the specific language
proposed for the text amendment. Staff has reviewed the
ZBA-57-A-91
ZBA-5'9-SU-91
September 26, 1991
Page 2 of 3
e,,�ist Lngr sat�:-_A lite antenna reguLations in the B-1 District
and recommends that. the text, of Section 14. 1,701 . C.2 be
aniended as f o I lows :
2. Satellitp antE-.^nria,, with a diameter exceeding forty inches
4C1'") subj ec t to the f o I I ow i n-g:
a. The maximum cliameter of any antenna shall riot exceed
eleven feet, (it).
b, Any ground-rROUrIted antenna shall be located entirely
behind the rear building line and shall not be located
iwithin any required side= or rear yard.
C. Any ground-mount*-d antenna shall be a minimum of ten
feet (1(7') from a principal building or structure.
d. Any ground-mounted dish shall not exceed fifteen feet
(1.5') in height above grade.
e. Ail ground-mounted satellite antennas shall be
installed and landscaped so as to be compatible with
surrounding properties.
f. Supplemental restrictions on all non-ground mounted
antennas (including roof and wall-mounted antennas). In
addition to the above, the following requirements shall
apply:
(1) Shall be located on the roof or on the rear side of
the building to which they are accessory;
(2) Shall have a maximum height as allowed in Section
14.1704;
(3) Shall have an overall, size and height which are in
proportion with the sq-ale of the building to which
they are accessory; and
(4) Shall be fully screened from view from adjacent
roadways and properties (from ground level) with
materials which are compatible with the building to
which they are accessory.
Staff believes that this language addresses the concerns
expressed by the Board.
4
ZBA-57-A-91
ZBA-59-SU-91
September 26, 1991
Page 3 of 3
The Board then generally discussed. the case and had no
objection.s.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request of an amendment to Section 14.1701-C-2 to
allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use
in the B-1 Shopping Center District as outlined in the Staff
report.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request of a Special Use permit per Section
14.1701.C.2 to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite
antenna.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
'V,.-,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE,—,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNK CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRE(�&F PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-57-A-91, ZBA-58-SU-91
APPLICANT: WALGREEN COMPANY
ADDRESS: 1028 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground
mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B-1 Shopping Center District.
The applicant is requesting a Special Use permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow
installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna.
PLANNING AND ZQNING SUMMARY IRECOMMENDATI ON
This request was continued to clarify the specific language proposed for the text amendment.
Pursuant to discussion at the August 22 meeting, staff has reviewed the existing satellite
antenna regulations in the B-1 District and recommends that the text of Section 14.1701.C.2
be amended as follows:
2. Satellite antenna, with a diameter exceeding forty inches (40"), subject to the
following:
a. The maximum diameter of any antenna shall not exceed eleven feet (11).
b. Any ground -mounted antenna shall be located entirely behind the rear building
line and shall not be located within any required side or rear yard.
c. Any ground -mounted antenna shall be a minimum of ten feet (10') from a
principal building or structure.
d. Any ground -mounted dish shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height above grade.
e. All ground -mounted satellite antennas shall be installed and landscaped so as to
be compatible with surrounding properties.
(3il Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
f. Supplemental restrictions on all non -ground mounted antennas (including roof and
wall -mounted antennas). In addition to the above, the following requirements shall
apply:
(1) Shall be located on the roof or on the rear or side of the building to which
they are accessory;
(2) Shall have a maximum height as allowed in Section 14.1704;
(3) Shall have an overall size and height which are in proportion with the scale
of the building to which they are accessory; and
(4) Shall be fully screened from view from adjacent roadways and properties (from
ground level) with materials which are compatible with the building to which
they are accessory.
Staff believes that this language addresses the concerns expressed by the Board concerning
size, screening, etc. appropriate to the B-1 Zoning District.
MEW
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
W,
Vjr.;::LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEk-,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN tfQ/
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
AUGUST 13, 1991
ZBA-57-A-91, ZBA-58-SU-91
WALGREEN COMPANY
1028 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-1 Shopping Center District
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
F-A—R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground
mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B-1 Shopping Center District.
The applicant is requesting a Special Use permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow
installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna.
14141amilm• 0
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to install a 6 foot diameter satellite
antenna on the roof of the Walgreen Store at 1028 South Elmhurst Road. The satellite
antenna is needed to link this store to Walgreen's nationwide prescription service. Satellite
antennas with diameters larger than 40" are only permitted as a special use.
This Walgreen Store is located in the B-1 Shopping Center District which is the only
commercial zoning designation that does not permit roof -mounted satellite antennas as a
Special Use, The applicant has chosen to seek an amendment to the B-1 text to permit
satellite antennas as a Special Use rather than seek a rezoning of the entire shopping center
to another commercial zoning designation.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Walgreen's is located in the middle
of Golf Plaza 11 Shopping Center. The property is surrounded by commercial development
on most sides. However, high-rise residential development is located directly to the south.
A primary concern is that residents on the upper floors of these buildings may be able to
see the antenna.
Walgreen's is proposing that the standards for roof -mounted satellite antennas included in
other commercial district Special Use Standards be incorporated into the B-1 Zoning
District under Section 14.1701.C.2.
One of the standards proposed for satellite antennas is that they be "fully screened from
view from adjacent roadways and properties (from ground level)". Walgreen's is proposing
a 4 -sided solid box for screening of the antenna. The 7 foot tall screens will be constructed
of metal siding painted a cream color to match the color of the antenna.
The proposed satellite antenna meets all the other proposed standards for non -ground
mounted antennas as follows;
1. The antenna will be located on the roof above the Walgreen Store to which it is an
accessory.
2. The proposed 6 foot antenna diameter is less than 1/3 the height of the building (20
ft. building height X 33% = 6.6 ft.).
3. The overall height of the dish including the screening box will be approximately 27.5
ft. Code allows a maximum building height of 30 ft.
4. The antenna will be at least 20 ft. from all property lines.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
S. The antenna and screening will be in scale with the building.
While the surrounding high-rise residential buildings are taller than the shopping center, the
proposed four-sided solid screening box should provide adequate screening to most
residents. Obviously, the antenna must be open to the sky to receive signals. As such, it
cannot be entirely screened from view from above. Staff believes that the proposed antenna
and screening box will be less objectionable than other existing utility fixtures on the
shopping center roof.
We have received some calls and a letter from neighbors with concerns about potential
interference with television transmission. The applicant should address this issue.
RV STAFF COMMENIS
No concerns or objections were expressed by other Village staff.
SLMMARYIREC!QMMENDATION
Staff has no objections to the requested text amendment or Special Use for a 6 foot
diameter roof-mounted satellite antenna. Staff notes that all the standards for roof-
mounted antennas have been met (e.g. screening; height). Staff recommends that the text
proposed for non-ground mounted antennas be added to the ordinance as Section
1701.C.2.h.
DMC:hg
CAF/
10/23/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XVII OF
CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
WHEREAS, Walgreen Company (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a text amendment to Chapter 14 (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to
allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas As a Special Use in a
B-1 Shopping Center District; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a text amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2
to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a Special Use in
a B-1 Shopping Center District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 57-A-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 22nd day, of
August, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the MoMnt Prospect Herald on the 6th day of August, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have,given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 57-A-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Section 14.1701.C.2, as amended, is hereby
further amended; so that hereinafter said Section 14.1701.2 shall
be and read as follows:
2. Satellite antenna, with a diameter exceeding forty inches
(40"), shall be subject to the following:
a. The maximum diameter of any satellite antenna shall not
exceed eleven feet
(111).
b.
Any ground -mounted
satellite antenna shall be located
entirely behind the rear building line and shall not be
located within any
side or rear yard.
C.
Any ground -mounted
satellite antenna shall be a minimum
of ten feet (101)
from the principal building or
structure.
d.
Any ground -mounted
satellite antenna shall not exceed
fifteen feet (151)
in height above grade.
e.
All ground -mounted
satellite antennas shall be installed
and landscaped so
as to be compatible with surround
properties.
f.
All non -ground -mounted
antennas (including roof and wall-
ZBA 57-A-91
Page 2 of 2
mounted antennas) shall be subject supplemental
restrictions:
(1) Shall be located on the roof or on the rear or side
of the building to which it is accessory;
(2) Shall have a maximum height as allowed in section
14.1704;
(3) Shall have an overall size and height which are in
proportion with the scale of the building to which
it is accessory; and
(4) Shall be fully screened from view from adjacent
roadways and properties (from ground level) with
materials which are compatible with the building to
which it is accessory.
SECTION FIVE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST':
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
11991.
CAF/
10/23/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS WALGREEN COMPANY
LOCATED AT 1028 SOUTH EIAMRST ROA
WHEREAS, The Walgreen Company (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to
property located at 1028 South Elmhurst Road (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot One (1), Lot Two (2) and Lot Three (3) in Di Mucci's
Resubdivision of Lots Three (3) through Seven (7), both
inclusive, in Juhnke's Subdivision of part of the
Northeast Quarter of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range
11, East of the Third Principal meridian, according to the
plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of
Titles of Cook County, Illinois on February 27, 1979, as
Document No. 3077963;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use to permit installation of
a roof (non -ground) mounted satellite antenna, as provided in
Section 14.1701.C.2; and
WHEREAS, 'a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use,
being the subject of ZBA 58 -SU -91, before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 22nd day of
August, 1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published
in.the Mount Prospect Herald on the 6th day of August, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in
support of the request being the subject of ZBA 58 -SU -91; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and
have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village
and that granting the Special Use requested in ZBA 58 -SU -91 would
be in the best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Special Use to the subject
property to permit a roof mounted satellite antenna, as provided
in Section 14.1701.C.2.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
ZBA 58 -SU -91
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES: -
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
'Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1991.
VILL-K-GE OF MOUNT PROSP`iCT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager W1---'
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE: October 25, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-60-V-91, 219 South Leonard Lane
Property owner George Karahalios has contacted me and indicated that he is prepared to
install the landscaping requested by the Village Board, required to screen his storage.
Mr. Karahalios indicated that he will have this landscaping installed prior to the November
5 Village Board meeting, and that the plantings will meet the approval of his concerned
neighbor.
I suggested he bring photographs of the landscaping to the Village Board meeting.
DMC:cl
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE T'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-60-V-91, GEORGE KARAHALIOS
LOCATION: 219 SOUTH LEONARD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
a variation application filed by George Karahalios. The applicant is requesting a variation
to Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2 1/2 ft. side setback for a shed rather than 5 ft. as
permitted by Code. The variation will allow an existing shed to remain.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of September 26, 1991. At the
meeting, George Karahalios presented testimony in support of the request. He stated that
he did not know he needed a permit for the shed and located it in the yard to avoid the
trees. He stated that it would be difficult to move the shed as it is supported by six posts
which are set in concrete.
Julie Farnham Planner, stated that a solid wood fence encloses the rear yard. The fence
and several trees help screen it from the neighbor. Staff believes that the shed is well
screened and has no objections to the request, but the yard is quite large, and the applicant
should address the possibility of relocating the shed.
Yolanda Balkin, affected neighbor directly north of the subject property, expressed concerns
about the shed location and believed the setbacks should be enforced.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the case. Several members expressed concern about
this being a self-created hardship and not meeting this important variation standard. Other
members stated that this is a relatively small variation and similar requests for sheds have
been approved in the past.
Accordingly, by a 3-3 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of a variation
to allow a 2 1/2 ft. side setback for a shed to remain in its existing location at 219 South
Leonard.
DMC: hg
-1-49 : , , r 1— Dean R. Crouse & Assoc..tes, Inc. c,,.*
lll.R'DrESllmw -Relisitied landSowyots A,* f�ea
p—pt
PLAT DF SUAVEY
LOT2IN BARSOCCHI'S SUBDIVISION BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART
OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE
11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT
OF SUBDIVISION REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES,
S OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON NOVEMBER 9, 1977 AS DOCUMENT 42980386,
(MORE COMIMCNLY KNOWN AS; 219 S. LEONARD, ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS)
LEONARD L.W.
04&f9ltAml""
OF
12
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 60-V-91
Hearing Date: September 26, 1991
PETITIONER:
George Karahalios
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
219 South Leonard
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 10, 1991
REQUEST:
Variation from Section
14.102.B.2 to allow a 2.5' side
setback for a shed rather than
the 5' as required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Mrs. Balkin of 217 S. Leonard
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.B.2
to allow a 2.5' side setback for a shed rather than 5' as
required by Code.
The petitioner, George Karahalios of 219 South Leonard,
presented his Case stating that he put a shed up without a
permit 2.5' from the side lot line. Mr. Karahalios stated
that he also put up a fence but had a permit for the fence.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the applicant constructed a 8' x 10' storage shed
in his rear yard 2.5' from the side lot line. A permit was
not obtained for the shed and the structure does not meet the
required 5' setbacks. Miss Farnham stated that the applicant
would like to keep the shed at the existing location. She
noted that the rear yard is enclosed by a solid wood fence
which helps screen the shed from the adjacent neighbor.
There are also several trees near the shed that provide
additional screening.
Mrs. Balkin of 217 S. Leonard stated that she lives next door
and this shed was put up without a permit and is 2' from the
fence and would like it moved to the required 5'. Mrs. Balkin
stated she also objected to the fence which she feels was
put in without a permit.
ZBA-60-V-91
September 26, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Karahalios stated that it would be very difficult to move
the shed which is anchored with six posts set in concrete.
Mr. Lannon questioned if Mrs. Balkin objected to the fence or
the shed.
Mrs. Balkin stated that she is objecting to the shed and
feels they should move it to the 5' as required.
The Board then generally discussed the case.
Chairman Basnik questioned the rationale of the required 5
ft. setback standard.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
there is a minimum setback for open air around a structure.
Mr. Saviano discussed the standards, stating that this
appears to be a self created hardship.
Mr. Brettrager noted that this is the same situation as
the Manglardi case -where the petitioner doesn't get a permit
and is therefore not aware of the standards.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2.5'
setback for a shed rather than the 5' as required by Code.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brettrager, Skowron
NAYS: Saviano, Cassidy, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 3-3.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN NX -1
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
ZBA-60-V-91
GEORGE KARAHALIOS
219 SOUTH LEONARD
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 10,021.7 sq. ft. (75.751 x 132.31)
% COVERAGE: 31.4%
F-A—R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
REDIM
, rhe applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 21/2 ft. side setback
for a shed rather than 5 ft. as required by Code.
Summary of application: The applicant constructed a 8' x 10' storage shed in his rear yard
2 1/2 ft. from the side lot line. A permit was not obtained for the shed, and the structure
does not meet the required 5 ft. setbacks. The applicant is requesting a variation to allow
the shed to remain in its existing location.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant states that the shed
was placed in the comer of the lot to avoid existing trees and be relatively inconspicuous.
Staff notes that the rear yard is enclosed by a solid wood fence which helps screen the shed
from the adjacent neighbor. There are also several trees near the shed that provide
additional screening especially from the front yard. Staff also notes that the shed is
constructed of wood that is very similar in appearance to the fence which minimizes it's
visual impact.
Because of the trees in the rear yard, it might be difficult to relocate the shed except toward
the center of the yard. The applicant should address any other potential locations that
would meet the setback requirements.
Engineering notes that a 10 ft. utility easement exists along the rear property line. The
shed, being 6 ft. from the lot line, extends 4 ft. in the easement. The applicant should be
aware that it is the owner's responsibility to incur costs related to potential relocation or
repair resulting from necessary utility work required in the easement.
Staff believes that the shed is relatively inconspicuous due to the fact that the yard is fenced;
the shed is constructed of wood that closely matches the fence; and the amount of mature
evergreen and deciduous trees around the shed provide some screening. However, the
applicant should address whether the shed could be relocated to conform to the required
5 ft. setback. Staff has no objections to this request.
DMC:hg
CAF
10/23/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 219 SOUTH LEONARD LANE
WHEREAS, George Karahalios (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation from chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 219 South Leonard Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 2 in Barsocchils Subdivision, being a subdivision of
part of the Northwest Quarter of Section 10, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
according to plat thereof registered in the Office of the
Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on November
9, 1977, as Document Number 2980386;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.102.8.2 to
allow a two foot 6 inch (21 611) sideyard setback, rather than 51
required, to accommodate a shed; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 60-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of
September, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of
September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 60-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a two foot 6 inches (21 611)
sideyard setback in order to accommodate a shed.
SECTION THREE: The variation granted herein is conditioned on the
Petitioner providing some form of landscaping that would screen
the shed from the neighbor to north.
SECTION FOUR: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
'u BA 60-V-91
Page 2 of 2
shall remain in full force and effect as to the subject Property.
SECTION -FIVE.' In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
ordinance.
SECTIO N six: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and six:
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 11991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
�carol —AFiei—d—s
—
Village clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MA AGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-61-V-91, SHAMIRAN VARDA
LOCATION: 1631 GREENWOOD AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Shamiran Varda. The applicant is requesting the following
variations:
1. Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45% front yard lot coverage.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of September 16, 1991. At the
meeting, Bruce Thill, Attorney for the petitioner, explained that the circular driveway is
requested for safety and aesthetic reasons. He noted the location of Mr. Varda's lot on
Greenwood near intersections with Barberry Lane and Wolf Road. He also noted that there
are other similar driveways in the neighborhood and this should not affect the aesthetic
character of the neighborhood.
The petitioner, Shamiran Varda, presented testimony in support of the request. He stated
that his family has five vehicles. He also indicated that the proposed width of 14 ft. is
necessary to maneuver vehicles around the curve.
Julie Farnham, Planner, indicated that construction has begun on the driveway which is
framed, but not paved yet. She stated that staff has some question about the need for a 14
ft. wide turn -around. Staff believes a 10 ft. wide turn -around is sufficient for the intended
purpose. A narrower turn -around would reduce the amount of front yard lot coverage.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the case. Members stated that traffic does get heavy
on this block of Greenwood, especially so close to Wolf Road. Several members expressed
concern about the proposed 14 ft. driveway width and front yard lot coverage. They stated
that they could support a narrower driveway.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variance to allow a circular driveway with a maximum width of 12 ft. and maximum front
yard lot coverage of 42% at 1631 Greenwood Drive.
NOW
E.wA-'
EX15T 2 srORY/Ve
45.591 ri
10 FT EA15EMr, FSR
PL.I&Lk:. UVILAT'19:6-
{y ;..,;"�,� � ,N•` �enlY � lam. X
My Y
u
{y ;..,;"�,� � ,N•` �enlY � lam. X
F
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 61-V-91
Hearing Date: September 26, 1991
PETITIONER:
Shamiran Varda
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1631 Greenwood Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 10, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular
driveway. Section 14.1102.A to
allow 45% front yard lot
coverage.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Tom Schultz of 1648 Barberry
John Manglardi of 1623 Cedar
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner
is requesting variations from Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a
circular driveway and from Section 14.1102.A to allow 45%
front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by Code.
The petitioner, Bruce Thill, attorney representing the
petitioner, presented this case stating that the petitioners
home is located at Greenwood and Wolf Road. Mr. Thill stated
that there is a high potential for accidents at this
intersection, and they have at least two instances a month.
Mr. Thill stated that this is a safety issue noting that
the petitioners driveway is very close to Wolf Road. He also
stated that this would not be the only circular driveway in
the neighborhood and will not alter the characteristics.
Mr. Lannon questioned the number of vehicles in the family
stating that he has noticed 6 cars in the driveway.
Mr. Varda of 1631 Greenwood stated that there are only 5 cars
on the driveway.
Mr. Lannon questioned why aren't two cars parked in the
garage.
ZBA-61-V-91
September 26, 1991
Page 2 of 3
Mr. Varda stated that they are doing remodeling to their home
and. are currently using the garage for storage.
Mr. Thill noted that a permit was pulled for the remodeling
work. He stated that the circular driveway was not included
on the permit because they had to seek a variation. He also
noted that the front yard. lot coverage has been recalculated
to 41.7% , with a 14' width for the circular driveway.
Chairman Basnik questioned if the remodeling work has been
completed.
Mrs. Skowron questioned who recalculated the lot coverage.
Mr. Thill stated that the remodeling is not done yet and the
owner recalculated the lot coverage noting they asked for 45%
as the maximum but has been calculated to 41.7% .
Mr. Cassidy asked if they would reduce the width to 10'.
Mr. Varda stated that it has already been dug out at 14',
and 10' would not be wide enough.
Mr. Cassidy stated that the safety factor applies but feels
the lot coverage should be reduced.
Mr. Saviano questioned how wide the other circular driveways
in the neighborhood are.
Mr. Varda stated that he thinks there about 16' wide, enough
for two cars.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
questioned the safety issue noting that Greenwood is a local
street in the neighborhood. She stated she has been out
there several times and has not noticed a lot of traffic.
She stated that the front yard lot coverage could be reduced
to 39% if the driveway width is reduced to 10'. She noted
that 10' in width would be adequate for a turnaround but not
for parking. She did note that other circular driveways exist
in the immediate neighborhood.
Mr. Cassidy noted that traffic is bad at that corner at
different times.
Thomas Schultz of 1648 Barberry, stated that he lives across
the street from the petitioner and there is a concern for
safety. Mr. Schultz stated that there have been many
accidents at this corner and if cars are parked on the street
it makes the situation worse.
ZBA-61-V-91
September 26, 1991
Page 3 of 3
John Manglardi of 1623 Cedar, stated that this a very
dangerous corner.
Mr. Lannon stated that he agrees with the petitioner that the
corner is dangerous but feels the driveway width should be
reduced to 10'.
Mr. Cassidy agreed with Mr. Lannon.
Mr. Brettrager agreed with the safety factor but feels the
impact on the lot is to much. He stated he would go along
with 12' in width.
Mr. Thill stated that the driveway is already dug out to 14'.
The Board discussed and agreed that 14' is too wide but all
agreed to 12' for the width of the driveway.
The petitioner agreed.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 14,3016.A.1 to allow a 12'
wide circular driveway and from Section 14.1102.A to allow
less than 429 front yard lot coverage as shown on exhibit #1.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Saviano seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
fim
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN mt/
DAVID A CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
ZBA-61-V-91
SHAMIRAN VARDA
1631 GREENWOOD AVENUE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 11,589 sq. ft. (86.7'x 133.6')
% COVERAGE: 27%; 45% front yard
F.A.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate a circular driveway.
1. Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted
by Code.
p A_
L_QNN NG�ANCIN—INIC--�MMT
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a circular driveway in his
front yard. Circular driveways are only permitted by variation. The additional pavement
also increases the front yard lot coverage to 45% which exceeds the maximum 35% allowed
by Code. Mr. Varda obtained a building permit for foundation repair at the home, but this
permit did not include a driveway.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is located on the
southwest comer of Greenwood Drive and Wolf Road. The existing and proposed
driveways access Greenwood Drive which is classified as a local street. The merits of a
circular driveway depend in part on safety factors relative to access onto a busy roadway.
The applicant states that the proximity of the driveway to the intersection with Wolf Road
increases the potential for accidents.
Staff notes that Greenwood Drive is a major access point off of Wolf Road for this
neighborhood. However, the amount of traffic on Greenwood Drive appears to be relatively
low. The applicant should justify the need for a 14 ft. wide circular drive. If the driveway
is to be used only for a turnaround, a narrower width should suffice. This would also reduce
the amount of front yard paving. For example, reducing the driveway width to 10 ft. reduces
the front yard lot coverage to 39%.
Staff observed two other circular driveways in the immediate neighborhood. One is on the
property across the street.
OTHER VILLAGE STAFF OMMENTS
No major concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
MMARYJRF
,COMMENDATION
Staff has some questions about the need for a turnaround on this street. The applicant
should demonstrate that the driveway is for safety reasons, rather than for the convenience
of drivers in the household. If this request is approved, staff suggests that the turnaround
lane be a maximum width of 10 feet.
DMC:hg
CAF
10/23/91
[41-aeummag
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1631 GREENWOOD AVENUE
WHEREAS, Shamiran Varda (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 1631 Greenwood Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 927 in Brickman Manor First Addition Unit 8, being
a subdivision in the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of
Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Section 14.3016.A.1 to
allow 'a circular driveway 141 wide and a variation from Section
14.1102.A to allow a front yard lot coverage of 45%; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 61-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of
September, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of
September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 61-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of thd Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.3016.A and allow a circular driveway with a maximum
width of twelve feet (121), and a variation from Section 14.1102.A
to permit a front yard lot coverage of 42%. The variations
originally requested by the Petitioner were amended by the
Petitioner to reduce the width of the proposed circular driveway
resulting in a reduced front yard lot coverage.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
ji:,_EcT10NFIVE* This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,1991•
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. �Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-62-V-91, FOUZAT FARHAN RIHANI
LOCATION: 108 NORTH MAIN STREET
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Fouzat Farhan Rihani. The applicant is requesting the
following variations:
1. Section 14.3016A1 to allow a 10 ft. wide circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45.7% front yard lot coverage rather than 35%.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting on September 26, 1991., At the
meeting, Mr. Rihani presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that it is
very difficult and dangerous to back onto Main Street (Route 83). The circular driveway
would provide a turn -around, eliminating the need to back onto Main Street.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that Main Street is classified as an arterial roadway and
carries a heavy volume of traffic throughout the day. Staff believes circular driveways are
justified on busy arterial roads.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that safety is an overriding issue
in this request. According, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
approval of a variation to allow a 10 ft. wide circular driveway and 45.7% front yard lot
coverage at 108 North Main Street.
DMC:hg
Y
wE
po 0
ui
LJ
Y �a LJ
FtaoE 6
142.05 ,rte, .
IS
294
Nl..._'•Y"" «i RedN RD
y A AE � PYE
wg-`�. RAsMED
.a" 7`•4. * "RKA RESKEhICE Q Yw.�r�,
V
,�` LOS Np. rOa •"t. i4L./"�
Ici
�l
-- —t4�"3
t
i
wONTH W+E OF E. nEMT STEEL
90156 �� 11.2611 �`
i
CROE%AUMMER i STATE Or {�
PATE OCTOBER z,
wCH «15 FEET u .�. STATE OF ILLINOIS
SCALL ------ ,,,, „,,,.......... COUNTY OF COOK
ORDERED 1Y . TaL`Marvaccnw navN sur+
g,JOHn MICHAEL NENRt RSEN,an I17tnats Ra1is e
land SurreYor, do here DY certf !Y that ! It,
�,•,„.=- ° the above described property and the t:
the Dl et
'F ANT ,$NO'NN HEREON ARE RutL Of NG dram is a ca rrect renra�a lna !tRt ands hu oared the
"Eu„LO; nG LBN&S„9 O1 Nenstont are s or
~.IRIS SAW ON THE RECORDED SUSOITIS10” ®"-.At'•.
CONS�,PLt LOCAL AUTHORITIES SOR 1UILOING L".NES are correct at A teepera ure of 61' 'ahrennett.
ESTA1059tO 1Y LOCAL ORp4NAtON ,.:.
,',LEASE Csttt LEGAL OESODBRTUtt ptS DEED,
^'EOMRRRE ALL D04RTS 1CFOAE 1kdiLpSNO AND REPORT --^cw;,,„ CLLINOIS REGR TEREO LANG SUAVETO
ANT at SCRERANCY "NMEOtATV Y� FROM SEALING. �....".-.-+"
":SNE NS4ONS ARE NOT TO 1E AS"GNEO
ry
«
✓
r
".
x
Iw
� µ
* *
u+
\q
JimA
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECt'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNII,, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-62-V-91
APPLICANT: FOUZAT FARHAN RIHANI
ADDRESS: 108 NORTH MAIN STREET
LOCATION MAP:
=L]jLjLftLJ
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 7,826.5 (551 x 142.3)
% COVERAGE: 30.2%; 45.7% front yard
F AL I- -. N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate a circular driveway:
Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45.7% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as
permitted by Code.
• WOMR0011-IMI
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a circular driveway in his
front yard to eliminate the need to back out onto Main Street (Route 83). Circular
driveways are only permitted by variation. The additional pavement increases the front yard
lot coverage to 45.7% which also requires a variation.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's property fronts on
Main Street (Route 83) which is classified as a major arterial roadway. Traffic on Main
Street is quite heavy throughout the day. In addition, vehicles travel at a fairly high speed
on Main Street. Backing onto Main Street could be difficult and present a traffic hazard.
The proposed driveway will be 10 ft. wide, which is about the minimum width needed for
maneuvering a vehicle around the curve. The applicant is also proposing to pave the gap
between the existing concrete driveway strips.
The applicant's lot is only 55 ft. wide which contributes to the higher degree of front yard
lot coverage. A turnaround lane of the same width and length on a typical 65 ft. wide lot
would result in an overall front yard coverage of 35.6%. Staff notes that the overall lot
coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
OTHER VILLAGE 5T AFF COMMENTS
No concerns were expressed by other Village staff. Engineering and Inspection Services
note that an I.D.O.T. permit is required for the additional access onto Route 83.
SLMMA"IRECOMMENDATION
Staff notes that this would be the only circular driveway in the immediate neighborhood.
However, staff believes that circular driveways are justified on busy arterial roadways where
the potential for traffic hazards is high. Staff recommends approval of the request.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO, 62-V-91 Hearing Date: September 26, 1991
PETITIONER: Fouzat Farhan Rihani
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
108 N. Main Street
PC.,'BLICATION DATE:
September 10, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular
driveway. Section 14.1102.A to
allow 45.7% front yard lot
coverage.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Bill Kalley of 106 N. Main
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016.A.1
to allow a circular driveway and from Section
ion 14.1102.A to
allow 45.7% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as
permitted by Code.
The petitioner, Fouzat Farhan Rihani of 108 N. Main Street,
presented his case stating that he lives on Route 83 and the
cars go very fast and he can't pull out of his driveway.
He stated that this is a safety hazard and has been waiting
over 2 months to have the road checked for speeders.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that this will be a 10' wide circular driveway and the
lot coverage will be increased to 45.7% noting that this is a
narrow 55' wide lot.
Bill Kalley of 106 N. Main, stated that there are many
accidents on Route 83 and many speeders. He stated that there
are no police checking for speeders who go at least 55 m.p.h.
The Board discussed the case and had no objections.
ZBA-62-V-91
September 26, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petiti(.-)ners request from Section 14>3016.A1 to allow a
circular driveway and from Section 14 11.02.A to allow 45.79
front yard lot cc,)verage.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried b,,,,,• a vote of 6-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
CAF
10/23/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 108 NORTH MAIN STREET
WHEREAS, Fouzat Farhan Rihani (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly kn6wn as 108 North Main Street (hereinafter referred to
as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 7 in Block 9 in Hillcrest, a subdivision of the
Northeast 1/3 of the Southwest 1/4 (except the north 2-
7/8 acres) in Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11,
East of the Third Principal Meridian, also the North 23.5
acres of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 (except
the west 295.1 feet of the South 295.1 feet lying north
of the South 543 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southwest
1/4) of Section 34, in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Section 14.3016.A.1 to
allow a circular driveway 101 wide and a variation from Section
14.1102.A to allow a front yard lot coverage of 45.7%; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 62-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of
September, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of
September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 62-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabqve are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.3016.A and allow a circular driveway with a maximum
width of ten feet (101), and a variation from Section 14.1102.A to
permit a front yard lot coverage of 44.7%.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR.: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
1�1
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO; JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-63-V-91, BRUNO ULASZEK
LOCATION: 8 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Bruno Ulaszek. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure rather than 120 sq. ft. as
permitted by Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 26,
1991. At the meeting, Bruno Ulaszek explained that he has several pieces of large garden
and lawn maintenance equipment and lawn furniture which he would like to store in the
proposed structure.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that this is a very large wooded lot and the proposed
structure would be well screened from the affected neighbor. She noted that lot coverage
is well below the maximum allowed.
Staffs primary concern is the potential to operate a business out of such a large accessory
structure. She noted that the recently passed home occupation ordinance does not permit
businesses in accessory structures.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that a driveway will not be
installed leading to the structure. They also noted an accessory structure of this size does
not appear out of scale on such a large lot.
Accordingly, by a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variation to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure in the rear yard of 8 South Busse Road
as shown on the submitted site plan, excluding the 8 ft. driveway.
DMC:hg
14-C,
6 5
Aloe Z7-
Y-,'te, i�j"4'h -
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA (7ASE NO. 63-%'-91
Hearing Date: September 26, 1991
PETITIONER:
Bruno Ulaszek
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
8 South Busse Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 10, 1991
REQUEST:
Variation from Section
14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq.
ft. accessory structure rather
than 120 sq. ft. as permitted by
Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.8.4
to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure rather than 120
sq.ft. as permitted by Code.
The petitioner, Bruno Ulaszek of 8 South Busse Road,
presented his case stating that he has 1 acre of land and he
owns a tractor lawn mower and snow blower and needs
additional storage to park the tractors which are now under
plastic.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitioner is requesting to build a 484 sq.
ft. accessory building or storage shed. The accessory
building is proposed to be 121 from the side lot line, 51'
from the house, and 172' from the rear lot line. Miss Farnham
noted that Dana Point Apartments are located to the rear of
the property. She also noted that the affected neighbor also
has two garages. Staff does not support the proposed 8'
driveway. She dicussed this with the applicant who stated
that the driveway wasn't neccessary. She stated that the
petitioner would also like to install an overhead door.
Miss Farnham stated that no business may be operated out of
an accessory structure. She also noted that the lot coverage
is well below the required 45% , and the structure will be
ZBA-63-V-91
September 26,
1991
Page 2 of 2
well screened by existing landscaping.
Mr. Ulaszek stated that he would like a 15' wide overhead
door to accommodate a car he wculd like to store in the
winter. He stated that he is nat a contractor and will not
use this for a, home occupation, it will be used for storage.
The Board then generally discussed the case and had no
objections with the 15' door size or the storage of the car.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to Section 14.1.02.B.4 to allow a 484 sq.
ft. accessory structure,
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CAIL: AYES: Lannon, Savinno, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
V'rjLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC-f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN wt -
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
CASE NO.:
ZBA-63-V-91
APPLICANT:
BRUNO ULASZEK
ADDRESS:
8 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
irAffiftW
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R. :
Asopolow
In
R-1 Single Family Residential
42,504 sq. it. (9931 x 3851)
10.9%
N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
REQUES
The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory
structure rather than 120 sq. ft., as permitted by Code.
XORMIA&VIM401011
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct an oversized (484 sq. ft.)
storage building in his rear yard. The structure will be used to store garden and yard
maintenance equipment. While the structure is similar to a garage, with an overhead door,
the structure will not be accessed by a driveway. The applicant also stated that he will not
use the building for any business activity.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is very large with
several mature trees. The lot is located directly south of a small commercial strip center
at the southwest corner of Central and Busse Roads. The proposed building will primarily
impact the resident to the south. As proposed, the building will be 12 ft. from the side lot
line, 51 ft. from the house and approximately 172 ft. from the rear property line. A mature
existing hedge along the south property line will screen the building from the affected
neighbor.
An existing gravel walkway next to the attached garage will remain. However, staff cannot
support construction of the driveway extending back to the storage building shown on the
site plan. Staff has discussed this with the applicant who stated that the driveway is not
necessary. An access walk 3 ft. - 5 ft. wide leading to the storage building would be
acceptable, if needed.
The structure itself will be similar in size to a garage. The applicant intends to build it
himself and will lower the height of the walls to meet the Code requirement of 10 ft. for an
accessory structure. The applicant would also prefer to install an overhead door.
Staffs primary concern with an accessory structure of this size is the potential to use the
building to operate a business. Home occupations are not allowed except under limited
conditions and can only be conducted within the primary structure.
The stated intended use of this building is for storage. The applicant should justify the need
for such a large storage building. An existing typical sized storage shed will be removed if
this structure is built. Staff -notes that the adjacent neighbor has an existing attached one -
car garage in addition to a detached garage in the rear yard, both of which are accessed by
a driveway.
01HER VILLATAFF COMMEMES
No concerns or objections were stated by other Village staff.
SIMMAMIRECOMMENDAMN
Staff believes that the ample setbacks proposed and the amount of existing landscaping on
the lot will sufficiently screen the building from the surrounding properties. Staff's main
concern regards the potential to operate a business out of the storage building. The
applicant should clearly explain the intended use and justify the need for a 484 sq. ft. storage
building.
°
� x, w .vr„�- .,: «'• � , ,4.,w� � mow. s.`.�, ��"�'°�°�.
M
#. • +� �
.,. ,' 'ret �r� Mk. )) � � ,+"
, . . �
itrr,
i
wi
CAF
10/23/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 8 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
WHEREAS, Bruno Ulaszek (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
8 South Busse Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property),
legally described as:
That part of Lot "Ell in Kirchoff Subdivision being a
subdivision of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East
of the Third Principal Meridian, lying South of the South
line of the North 2 acres of said Lot "Ell and North of
a line 1017.79 feet North of and parallel with the South
line of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter
of Section 10, all in Cook County, Illinois;
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to
allow a 484 square foot accessory structure, rather than the
permitted 120 square feet; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 63-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of
September, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of
September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 63-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow an accessory structure 484 square
feet in size, as shown on the site plan attached hereto and hereby
made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
ZBA 63-V-91
Page 2 of 2
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
(9 45014 1
st7v-t6
D/
I,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER h/�L
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-64-SU-91, A. J. ROGERS COMPANY
LOCATION: 501 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use application filed by A. J. Rogers & Company. The applicant is requesting an
amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4156 to include 501 West Algonquin Road in
Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit Development.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 26,
1991. At the meeting Kathi Rogers, Vice President of A. J. Rogers and Company explained
that they acquired the property at 501 West Algonquin Road after the creation of the
Roger's Corporate Park Planned Unit Development, and would like to include this property
into the P.U.D. A prospective tenant would like to take advantage of the limited retail use
recently approved for the P.U.D.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning explained that 501 West Algonquin was
physically coordinated into the overall site plan for Rogers Corporate park. He also
explained that all the requirements which pertain to the existing P.U.D. would apply to this
property if it is incorporated into the P.U.D.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and had no objections. Accordingly, by
a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of an amendment to Special
Use Ordinance # 4156 to include 501 West Algonquin in Rogers Corporation Park P.U.D.
DMC:hg
ALGONQUIN ROAD
......._-__....--_.w._.._______
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIII, CHAIRMAN W/
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
ZBA-64-SU-91
A. J. ROGERS COMPANY
501 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD
M
-'1Iff--rf - 7
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1-1 Light Industrial
LOT SIZE: Approximately 2.8 acres
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4156 per Section
14.2201 to include 501 West Algonquin Road in Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit
Development.
us] ma rkel k , Ef K101 a M LOWK
1h
Summary of application: A. J. Rogers & Company acquired the property at 501 West
Algonquin after the Rogers Corporate Park P.U.D. was created. They would like to
incorporate this property into the existing P.U.D. Consequently, the existing P.U.D. must
be amended to expand it's boundaries.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: There are two predominant reasons
for this request. First, while 501 West Algonquin is not within the original P.U.D.
boundaries of Rogers Corporate Park, the park was designed with features that physically
inter -connect these adjacent properties. These features include a common access off
Algonquin Road and shared parking.
Secondly, a prospective tenant at 501 West Algonquin, would like to be allowed limited
retail use, which was recently granted for the P.U.D. The tenant, Chicagoland Processing
manufactures commemorative coins and would like to operate a small retail business out
of their manufacturing facility.
Inspection Services notes that all deed covenants which apply to the original P.U.D. (i.e. for
street lights) should be extended to this property. In addition, the subdivision requirements
for sidewalks and street trees will also be required. Engineering notes that an I.D.O.T.
permit is required for sidewalk construction along Algonquin Road.
Staff has no objections to the requested P.U.D. amendment. The property at 501 West
Algonquin has been physically coordinated into the overall Rogers Corporate Park site plan.
In addition, the use proposed by the prospective tenant is permitted under 1-1 zoning and
would meet the intent of the limited retail provisions recently granted for Rogers Corporate
Park P.U.D.
DMC:hg
-,7 IN� 1',F ;0RD O)F APPF�L:�
7
n I
F)� IF 4 IU F S
MFIIBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT�
Septemb-r 1.0, 1991
An Amendment to Special Use
ordinance =4156 per Section
1-4.2201. to include 501 West
Algonquin Road. into the Rogers
Corporate Park Planned Unit
Development,
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
Richard Pratt
PARTIES9None
Chairman rinan Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting an amendment to Special Use
brdinance # 4156 per Section 14.2201 to include 501 West
Algonquin into the Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit
Development.
Kathi Rogers, Vice President of Arthur J. Rogers & Company,
presented this case stating that they recently acquired the
property at 501 West Algonquin and would like to include it
into the P.U.D. at Rogers Corporate Park located at Algonquin
and Elmhurst Roads.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the amendment of the P.U.D. to include 501 West Algonquin,
which was acquired after the P.U.D. was approved'. He noted
this property shares a common driveway with the Rogers
Corporate Park. Mr. Clements noted that this property would
be for a prospective tenant Chicagoland Processing, which
would like to take advantage of the limited retail provisions
recently approved for the P.U.D.
Mr. Cassidy asked if this would cause any future problems.
Mr. Clements stated that the P.U.D. requirements will apply
ZBA-64-SU-91
September]' 26, 1991
Page 2 of 2
ano Fs.yj A!' ba m) admrse impact.
%ir, !o,jrjrron notad that this is in an 1-1. zonin=
district wh1rh
j, the x1me as '.jjI-,oq
,ers (urpor,-,t.e Park,
7h, Intl then dinuussed the rase and had no objections.
rhairman SannIN then entertairial a motion to grant the
poKslonern pquest for an amendment to "apeK-Alls— *4136 per
qe"Iton 14,2201 to include 501 'West Algonquin Road into the
Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit Deselopment.!
Mr. Wetzrag,,r moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPOK POLL CALL: AYER: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, iBasnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
CAF/
10/23/91
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4156
GOVERNING PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT
1840 - 1894 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD TO INCLUDE
501 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD IN THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
WHEREAS, Arthur J. Rogers and Company (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend Ordinance No. 4156, being
an Ordinance authorizing a Special Use in the nature of a Planned
Unit Development with respect to property commonly known as 1840-
1894 South Elmhurst Road (hereinafter referred to as the Subject
Property) and legally described as follows:
Lot 1 in Rogers Corporate Park, being a Subdivision of
part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to Ordinance No. 4156 to
add newly acquired property to the Planned Unit Development, which
newly acquired property, commonly known as 501 West Algonquin Road,
is legally described as follows:
Lot 1 in Keolyn Plastics, Inc. subdivision of the North 683.46
feet of the East 200 feet of that part of the Northeast 1/4
of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range
1 ' 1, East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying West of the
East 20 acres of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of
Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for amendment
(designated as ZBA Case No. 64 -SU -91) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of
September, 1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the loth day of
September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by granting the request
in ZBA 64 -SU -91.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Ordinance No. 4156 entitled "An Ordinance
Granting a Special Use in the Nature of Planned Unit Development
for Property Generally Located at the Southwest Corner of Elmhurst
F101
LM
ZBA 64 -SU -91
Page 2 of 2
and Algonquin Roads" is hereby amended to include the following
parcel within the Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit Development:
Lot I in Keolyn Plastics, Inc. subdivision of the North 683.46
feet of the East 200 feet of that part of the Northeast 1/4
of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range
11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying West of the
East 20 acres of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of
Cook County, Illinois,
commonly known as 501 West Algonquin Road.
dECTIDU THRE* That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect, from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1991.
1,— --11
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of.Planning and Zoning
DATE: October 25, 1991
SUBJECT: Orchard Field Townhomes - Amendment to P.U.D,
As the Village Board directed, I have sent a letter to all property owners on Highland
Avenue abutting Orchard Field Townhomes, advising them of the possible installation of
a 6' fence.
Also, builder Michael Lasacco has submitted an invoice from Rustic Fence Company
indicating the current height of the fence, with a commitment to install the fence by
December 31, 1991.
DMC:cl
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VIL4AGE MANAGER W—
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-65-SU-91, BLUE JAY BUILDERS
LOCATION: 400 EAST BLUE JAY COURT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use application filed by Blue Jay Building Corporation. The applicant is
requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 4187 per Section
14.1401 to allow patios on certain dwelling units to encroach 10 ft. into the required 20 ft.
perimeter yard.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of September 26, 1991. At the
meeting, Mario Losacco of Blue Jay Building Corporation, presented testimony in support
of the request. He stated that they would like to modify the floor plan of the interior units
to increase the living space. This would be done by relocating the inset patios to the back
of the building and converting the inset patio space to living area.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the original site plan
approved for the Planned Unit Development requires a 20 ft. perimeter yard. The proposed
amendment would allow patios to encroach 10 ft. into the perimeter yard. He noted that
staff has several concerns with the request, including:
1. Reducing the setback by 50% could significantly reduce the amount of open space
and increase the impact on the neighbors. He noted that staff could support a
smaller, 6'-8' encroachment.
2. Screening should be increased to minimize the impact on the neighbors. Staff
suggests fencing and/or additional landscaping be installed along the north property
line or adjacent to the patios. He noted that initially a fence was considered for the
north property line but natural landscaping was preferred.
Mr. Clements also stated that the petitioner would like the option to allow some end unit
patios to encroach into the perimeter yard. He stated that this is within the scope of the
legal notice and could be considered a part of this request.
John Fulton Dixon
Page Two
October 7, 1991
Five residents of Highland Avenue which back up to the townhornes expressed concerns
with the proposal. They stated that lo ft. is too close to the lot line for the patios which
would infringe on their privacy. They also stated that they would support a fence along the
north property line.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request noting that the proposed modification
would affect 18 patios - 10 on the north side and 8 on the south. They expressed concerns
about the encroachment and the screening. The Zoning Board believed a 6 ft. fence along
the north line was a good compromise to meet the needs of the neighbors and the
petitioner. They also discussed reducing the patio depth to 8 ft to minimize the
encroachment.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of an
amendment to Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 4187 per Section 14.1401 to allow
patios to encroach 8 ft. into the required perimeter yard subject to:
1. Maximum patio size shall be limited to 8' x 12'.
2. A landscape plan to include a 6 ft. solid wood fence along the north property line
and planting modifications subject to staff approval-
DMC:hg
_,�
_____ _�
- -�-
�,, �— �va.����� - �—�
� �
\\\ l ii
( t
k
= t
� t L � �"__ �.- - � �—_ t '_
e= }>_
s
z
� �y _
L
i
a`� ._a �; __ � �
��._� � �;.�` ig) �j :�: � .�y) +.st {a,) a acs ! i3) � � i
{ � � ` t3
: 1,�
I -; n- ad }
2 ! �� � i
- - — - ��. _���_ _ f - � i �c a�E -"3
d } - _. _ .. _.l _. _._ _..
' t i 1 �
�: ,� � t
—i -_�
- _ i
(Y i
� --- _- - - <. .. 3 J
ffi
i c r � .��- cif
dr n _,
.� 3
f 1 -
i�
.. _
�.� a
V.t,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE.,---f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN pk�
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-65-SU-91
APPLICANT: BLUE JAY BUILDERS
ADDRESS: 400 EAST BLUE JAY COURT
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-3 (Apartment Resident District) - P.U.D.
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
FA—R.: N/A
R'
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The applicant is requesting an amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance #4187 per Section 14.1401
to allow patios on certain dwelling units to encroach 10 ft. into the required perimeter yard.
Summary of application: 'The applicant hopes to modify the original floor plan of one type
*f unit available in the Blue Jay Townhome development. The modification involves
relocating the patios on "A" units from their original inset position to a location off the
living room extending into the perimeter yard. This creates a more desirable interior space
arrangement as the inset patio area will be converted to living/dining room area. The plan
depicts these modifications to the units.
The applicant is proposing 10, x 11T patios, which would extend 10 ft. into the 20 ft.
perimeter yard established on the originally approved P.U.D. site plan. Consequently, the
P.U.D. must be amended to accommodate such a significant plan modification.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The patio relocation is proposed for
10 of the 21 dwelling units included in the original P.U.D. site plan. Six of these patios
would extend toward the north property line, and four would extend toward the south
property line. The north property line abuts single family lots which front onto Highland
Avenue, The south property line abuts a large lot with a single family home.
Staff has several concerns with the proposal. These include:
1. Screening of the patios, especially along the north property line which abuts the rear
yards of several single family homes. When this development was originally reviewed
by the Zoning Board of Appeals, some concerns were expressed about screening this
development from the residents to the north. A six foot high fence was required
along the east property line of this development. However, landscaping rather than
a fence was recommended for the north property line.
Staff believes that if the perimeter yard is reduced, screening should be increased
accordingly to minimize the impact on the neighbors. Screening could be increased
by several methods: 1) installing a 6 ft. fence along the north property line; 2)
increasing the density of the existing landscape screening along the north property
line; 3) installing screening fences around the patios; or 4) installing landscape
screening around the patios. The applicant should address the feasibility of these
alternatives.
2. Staff is generally concerned about decreasing the existing 20 ft. perimeter yard by
50%. Staff discussed this with the applicant who indicated a willingness to
reconfigure the patios to 8' x 12' dimensions. This would result in a setback of 12
feet. Staff notes that the R -X, R-1, R -A and R-2 Districts permit patios to come as
close as 15 ft. to the rear property line. While a minimal encroachment is preferred,
patios must be at least 6 ft. wide for functional purposes.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
Staff also notes that in the Evergreen Woods Townhome development, 8'x 10' patios
were permitted to encroach into the 25 ft. setback. However, because of the larger
perimeter yard, the patios maintain a minimum 15 ft. setback
3. Staff also has concerns about drainage and grading in the perimeter yard. A drainage
swale exists near the center of the north perimeter yard. Filling or regrading to
accommodate patios might result in the need to regrade the drainage Swale.
Obviously, minimizing the width extension of the patio will minimize the impact on
the existing drainage swale.
Engineering and Inspection Services both note that grading in the north perimeter yard is
critical. Detail grading plans must be submitted to determine if patios can be constructed
there without altering the required swale drainage.
No other concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
SUMMARY/RECOMMENDAIU!QN
Staff cannot support the proposed 10 ft. encroachment into the perimeter yard, particularly
on the north side. Staff could support an extension of 6 ft. - 8 ft. provided:
1. Additional fencing or landscaping is installed either along the north property line or
abutting the patios; and
2. Patios can be constructed without altering the required drainage swale.
DMC:hg
t
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 63 -SU -91
Hearing Date: September 26, 1991
PETITIONER:
Blue Jay Builders
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Blue Jay Court
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 10, 1991
REQUEST:
An amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance
#4187 per Section 14.1401 to
allow patios on certain dwelling
units to encroach 10' into the
required perimeter yard.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Full Audience
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting an amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance #
4187 per Section 14.1401 to allow patios on certain dwelling
units to encroach 10' into the required perimeter yard.
The petitioner, Mario Losacco of Blue Jay Building
Corporation, presented his case stating that he would like
to increase the size of living space in the units by
converting the patio area to living area. Mr. Losacco
stated that people have come thru the models and have stated
they would want a larger kitchen area or living room area. He
stated he is proposing to build 10' x 101 patios which would
extend 10' into the 20' perimeter yard.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning stated that
the applicant is proposing 10' x 10' patios which would
extend 10' into the 20' perimeter yard established on the
originally approved P.U.D. site plan. Mr. Clements stated
that the P.U.D. was approved approximately 2 years ago.
Relocating the patios would alter the floor plan slightly
giving the unit a larger living/dining area. He noted that
the P.U.-D. has only a 20' rear yard and with this proposal
it would be reduced to 10'. He stated that staff would
support a 6'-8' encroachment with additional screening.
Additional landscaping or fencing would reduce the impact on
ZBA-65-SU-91
September 26, 1991
Page 2 of 3
residents ort Highland which is directly north of the P.U.D.
and should be required. Mr. Clements stated the a 6' fence
request is reasonable for screening and would coordinate with
the fence constructed along the east property line.
Kim Nelson, 409 F. Highland, stated that her home abuts the
toL,;nhomes and would like a fence installed and does not want
any other encroachments.
Randy Ridge, 407 E. Highland, stated that he would like a
fence installed but does not object to the patios.
John Michaels, 505 E. Highland, stated he supports a fence
but did not realize there would be this much encroachment.
Barry Tabus, 507 E. Highland,
shouldn't suffer with the enc
Michael Nelson, 409 E. Highla
for privacy and safety.
Michael Losacco of Blue Jay b
he wanted to put in a fence i
residents wanted landscaping.
not mature yet. He also state
7' to 8' from the property li
will put in a fence, but woul
landscaping required.
Mr. Michaels stated he feels
and would also like landscapi
Mr. Cassidy asked the petitic
with the petitioner.
Mr. Losacco stated that 8' x
there will be a total of 18
supports a fence but feels they
oachment.
, stated he supports the fence
ilding Corporation stated that
the beginning but the
He stated that the shrubs are
that the neighbors garages are
e. Mr. Losacco stated that he
like to decrease the amount of
he fence should be mandatory
9.
r if an 8' x 12' patio is okay
2' is okay with him noting that
tios.
The Board then generally discussed the Case and stated that
they would like a modified landscaping plan approved by Staff
with a 6' fence installed on the north side of the property
and a maximum 81 x 12' patio size.
The petitioner agreed.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for an amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance
4187 per Section 14.1401 to allow 8' x 12' patios on certain
dwelling units to encroach up to 8' with maximum patio size
i
ZBA-65-SU-91
September 26, 1991
Page 3 of 3
of 8' x 12' conditioned on submission of a modified
landscaping plan approved by Staff and a 6' fence installed
along the north side of the property.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
CAF/
10/23/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4187
GOVERNING PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT
400 EAST BLUE JAY COURT
WHEREAS, Blue Jay Builders (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed a petition to amend ordinance No. 4187, being an
Ordinance authorizing a Special Use in the nature of a Planned Unit
Development with respect to property commonly known as 500 East
Blue Jay Court (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property)
and legally described as follows:
Orchard Field Townhomes subdivision being a subdivision of
part of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of
Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to the Site Plan of the
Planned Unit Development being the subject of ordinance No. 4187
toallowpatios to encroach ten feet (101) into the required 201
perimeter yard; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for amendment
(designated as ZBA Case No. 65 -SU -91) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of
September, 1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of
September, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by granting the request
in ZBA 65 -SU -91.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Ordinance No. 4187 entitled "An Ordinance
Granting a Special Use in the Nature of Planned Unit Development
for Property Located 400 East Rand Road" is hereby amended by
attaching a new Site Plan, a copy of which Amended Site Plan is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", and
subject to the following conditions:
1. Petitioner shall install a six foot (61) high board -on-
board fence along the north property line as a screen for
the existing homes on Highland Avenue.
2. The Petitioner shall submit a revised landscape plan for
approval by the Department of Planning and Zoning.
3. The patios encroaching into the perimeter yard shall be
ZBA 65 -SU -91
Page 2 of 2
no larger than eight feet by twelve feet (81 x 121),
leaving a twelve foot (121) rear yard.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol-AFiel-dS
-
Village Clerk
9
0 1
-M HL- MfR
(Aj (a)
-
'
i
i } }
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
OCTOBER 28, 1991
SUBJECT:
ZBA-66-V-91, JAMES AND MARTHA HELM
LOCATION:
215 SOUTH HILUSI
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by James and Martha Helm. The applicant is requesting a
variation to Section 14.102.8.1 to allow a .portion of a deck to come as close as 5 feet from
an existing detached garage.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of October 10, 1991.
At the meeting James and Martha Helm presented testimony in support of the request.
They stated that they hope to construct a room addition and deck onto their existing home
to expand their living area.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires a 10 foot separation
between the existing detached garage and the proposed deck. As proposed, the deck will
come as close as 4.5 ft. to the garage. She noted that the lot is only 50 ft. wide which
contributes to the need for a variation. In addition, the affected neighbor to the north has
a similar sized addition.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that the narrow lot width creates
a hardship. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval
of a variance to allow a deck to come as close as 4.5 ft. from an existing detached garage
at 215 South HiLusi.
DMC:hg
LUS/
C
G
•f'�c2aa.oa
W
�
W
n a
�
•.i' a /r
t
„�
� ♦
O
N
w
N
lo(o'V- 91
z
3
Y
e -
S .71
0
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR �IEETING OF' THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONIN(3 BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE \(), 66 9 1 Hearing Date: 0 -.toper 1.0, 1991
P ET 111-10 N E R w James and "lartha Helm.
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 21-5 S. Hi Lusi Avenue
UB I
--ICATION DA -E: September, 24, 1.031
REW-'EST: Variations from Section
14.102.B.1 to allow a room
addition to come as close as
8.75 ft. from an existing
detached garage. From Section
14.102.B.1 to allow a Portion of
a deck to come as close as 5'
from an existing detached
garage.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSF\T: Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is seeking variances from Section 14.102.B.1. to
allow a room addition to come as close as 8.75' from an
existing detached garage. Also, from Section 14.102.B.1 to
allow a portion of a deck to come as close as 5' from an
existing detached garage.
The petitioners, James and Martha Helm of 215 S. Hi Lusi,
presented their case stating that they would like to put an
addition and a deck on their home. Mrs. Helm stated that they-
would
heywould like more space in their home but the addition and deck
come too close to the existing detached garage.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitioner would like to put an addition onto
their home. Miss Farnham stated that there must be a 10'
separation between a primary structure and an accessory
building. In this case the deck, which is part of the primary-
structure,
rimarystructure, is proposed to be 5' from the detached garage.
Miss Farnham noted that the neighbor to the north has a
similar room addition. She noted that the F.A.R. and lot
ZBA466-V-91
October :0, 1991
Page 2 of 3
Iww the Code requirements. Miss Farnham stated
no majnr non:ernq were en4pr(�ssed by ,..athpr �A,Ilagr Staff,
Ku"Pvrr, EnspepQnn SerVices suggests that 5/8" Class X
drywall be instalhed on the interior of the =xiKing garage
for fire dratection. She noted that this is a narrov lot,
nVy 50' V W&Q.
The Board then diseussed the case and had no objections.
Chaivman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
peLitioners request from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a room
addition to come as close as 8.75' from an existing detached
garage with a condition to install 5/8- Class X drywall in
the garage.
Mr. 3rattrager mo,,ed- Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: WES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Biettrager,
SRowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried bM- a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a
portion oC a deck to come as close as 5' from an existing
detached garage.
Mr. Saviano moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
MMUME
Motion carried by a v
Mr. Brettrager then m
record the Zoning Boa
petitioners request f
8.751 from an existin
5/8' Class X drywall
Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:
NAYS:
ne
of 6-0.
d to prepare resolution:* Z-66-91 to
of appeals approval of the
a room addition to come'as close as
arage with, a condition to install
the garage.
nnon, Saviano, Pratt, Bretttager,
owron, Basnik
ane
Page `� oC
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretart-
'*,.-jLIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL--,-f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN M/
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: SEPTEMBER 30, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-66-V-91
APPLICANT: JAMES AND MARTHA HELM
ADDRESS: 215 SOUTH HI LUST
LOCATION MAP:
1711MIM11
F-71 F-71-) (
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1, Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 7,776 sq. ft. (50' x 155.5')
% COVERAGE: 40.5%
FAR.: 0.25
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations:
Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a room addition to come as close as 8.75 ft. from an
existing detached garage.
2. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a portion of a deck to come as close as 5 ft. from an
existing detached garage.
Code requires a 10 ft. separation for both requests.
t
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 15'-6" x 18' room
addition and attached deck to the back of the existing house. The location of an existing
detached garage behind the house results in the need for variations as the addition and deck
will be less than 10 ft. from the garage.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential impact: The applicant's lot is only 50 ft. wide
which contributes to the need for the variation. The applicant states that a narrower room
addition would be inappropriate. The proposed width of 15'-6" leaves an 8.75 ft. separation
from the garage.
The deck wraps around the addition and comes as close as 4.5 - 5 ft. from the garage. Both
the addition and deck maintain the required 5 ft. side setback established by the existing
house. The lot is relatively long so the rear setback is approximately 70 ft.
Staff notes that the lot coverage and Floor Area Ratio are below Code requirements. In
addition, the affected neighbor to the north has a similar room addition.
iii
No major concerns were expressed by other Village staff. However, Inspection Services
suggests that 5/8" Class X drywall be installed on the interior of the existing garage for fire
protection.
YIRECOMNIENDATION
Staff has no objections to this request but suggests that approval be conditioned on
fireproofing the existing garage with 5/8" Class X drywall, as suggested by Inspection
Services.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE: October 25, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-67-V-91, Kenneth and Laverne Holste
LOCATION: 216 South Main Street
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Kenneth and Laverne Holste. The applicant is requesting
a variation to Section 14.3016 to allow a 33' wide driveway to accommodate a parking
pad/turnaround.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of October 24, 1991. At the
meeting, Kenneth Holste presented testimony in support of the request. He stated that it
is difficult to back onto Main Street (Route 83) and a turnaround would eliminate that
problem. In addition, they want to have extra parking space for visitors.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the applicant is basically requesting to pave an
existing gravel parking area. The proposed additional pavement increases the lot coverage
to 52.8% which is staff's major concern. She indicated that she discussed alternative
turnaround configurations with the applicant that wouldn't require as much pavement.
While the applicant is willing to compromise, they believe their proposal will best meet their
needs. She noted that this is a small lot which contributes to the need for a lot coverage
variation.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request and members expressed concerns about
the amount of lot coverage. Members acknowledged the need for a turnaround on this lot
but believed that a smaller turnaround area would function adequately.
Accordingly, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variation to allow a driveway width of 33' at 216 South Main Street.
In addition, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals approved a variation to allow a
maximum of 51% lot coverage, noting that the final turnaround configuration would be
subject to staff approval. The Zoning Board is final on this variation.
JF:cl
JF 1,WeglAl
OAV7 ox -we
C4
7Z
14F -'7
74 i
JF 1,WeglAl
0
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETrNG OF THE
M=47 PROSPECT 7ONTYC 1:3n ARD OF APPEW
BA -14F S7-,-91 Hearing Date: October 249 1991.
.,,.h,. R. Nennet.h and Laverna.--, Holste
Sj7rT PA5PYRTT:
216 South Main Street
PUBLICkTTON DWE:
October 8, t991
REQUEST:
Viria,tions from
to allc)w a driveway u:idth r)f 33'
at the widest point rather Lhar
21' as permitted blCode,
Section 14,11.02,E to allow 52,8%
ict coverage rather than -15% as
permi-tted by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
-T
PAR71FS:None
Chairman Fasnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting the following variations to
accommodate widening of their driveway. From section 14.3016
to allow a width of 33' at the widest point rather than 21'
as permitted by Code. Also, from Section 14.1102.E to allow
52,8% lot roverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code.
The petitioner, Kenneth Holste of 216 South Main Street,
Tresented his case stating that he lives on Main Street,
(Route 83) and it is difficult to back out onto 83, He would
like to increase the driveway width by 12', so he can pull in
and turn around and also for extra parking when they have
nompany over.
Julio Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitioner would like to pave over an
existing gravel area that is 33' at the widest point. Miss
Farnham stated that this would allow a turnaround and extra
parking for the petitioner noting that this additional
pavement would increase the lot coverage to 52.8% . She noted
that this is a small lot with 51.3% as existing lot coverage
which includes the gravel area. Miss Farnham stated t1at
7BA-57-V-9i
October 21,
Age 2 of 3
no nnjc: on�i-ns v;AAli �, i ju-NN-ti —quwst
e i Ane r — a ' - 1 � loin Krnet. Hn%pws�,
r n o; 4021-"q- Am pav"M-W %;
Mrs, Sw.yrnn q"nstjoned th& AAA shown on the draNing
,hat v hy 271 jetween thp dock and 'ha outside odge of'
h e eK i A 1 1 n g d r h en, y SH .d th i --, p rupo sa I
Mr. RuIsne stated that he can park'three cars that face north
and south,
M " D,qv, nao,Y 1 nna,H hnw innv PArs the mUtIoner hasm
W, HPIVP statol that Ae, Uva 2 oar,
Mr. Pratt stated that he understands the need for a tu-n
a round b 1 F,v I s t 4 i s 1 s all -xr" A x i %it amuant af pavebra en t
Mr. HolstH statod Vat he is thin& ng of when they have
company over no"ing they can't park on the stfeet.
Chairman BagnA questioned if the proposal put this over "he
quare fc-rage of I ot cover,-igf�,
Niss Farnhnm stated that this is a substandard size lot wh27h
is ourrpntly ovar the maximum 15% coverage allowed, based on
the survoy drawing.
Chairman Basnik questioned if the petitionir floods or if any
neighbors have.
Mr. Holste stated he has never been Hooded and ,does not
think his neighbors have.
Miss Farnham stated that tine Zon`Lng Ctr-linanco.e irequires
parking areas to be paved noting that paving could be easier,
to maintain and look better.
The Ward then discussed the petitioners request.
Mrs. Skouran stated that for the size of the lot, and the
amount of payment is a little extreme. She stated she would
support a portion of the pavement for a turnaround.
Mr. Saviano questioned if the neighbors have wide drivewaYs.
Mr. HoWe stated Lhat both neighbors have widened driveways
4
ZBA-67-V-91
October 24, 1991,
Page 3 of 3
W. Savlann questioned if the Int. (yovfr�.-i,ge ts
1-1ii ;r,;,I"tPd thai she did not have the survpys but
tho; Oo We similar to sizes. Miss Farnham then shi"ad
board in alternative turnaround configuration that wnu]�a
Chairman 103snik nsked if the petki-oner could livo with '.
cQmprnmjse simlar to staff proposal ;Bich had Inss pavmwnt,-
Ar. 7n:ste stated that he did not prefer the alternative but
if that is what the Board will accept he agreed.
Mr. Pratt noted that there is a concern for the lot coverage
and drainage.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to allow a wid.th of 33' at the widest
point as shown on petitioners exhibit * 1 , and also from
Section 14,1102.E to all(DW 51% lot- coverage as shown on
petitioners exhibit 4 1.
Mr. Saviano fnoved. �Irs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of -1-0.
Mr. Pratt then moved to prepare Resolution 4 Z-67-91 to
recorded the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the
request for 51% lot coverage.
Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Saviano, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried. by a vote of 4-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board,
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
MIT
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
rim
V.3c,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEk-.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIII, CHAIRMAN *U
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
OCTOBER 14, 1991
ZBA-67-V-91
KENNETH AND LAVERNE HOLSTE
216 SOUTH MAIN STREET
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -I Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 50'x 157', 7,850 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 52.8% Proposed
F.A.R. : N/A,
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicants are requesting the following variations to accommodate widening of their
driveway:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a width of 33 feet at the widest point rather than 21
feet as permitted by Code.
2. Section 14.1102.E to allow 52.8% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted
by Code.
lawimala"MI]FAI)a!
Summary of application: The applicants are proposing to widen their driveway to create
a turnaround/parking pad. The applicant also states that additional parking area is needed
to accommodate the family's vehicles.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot fronts on Main
Street (Route 83) which carries a large volume of traffic making it difficult to back onto the
street. The existing driveway is very narrow (approximately 8 ft.) in front of the house and
along the garage. The driveway widens to meet the detached garage. Only half of the
existing driveway is paved in the rear yard. The remainder of the existing driveway is gravel.
The gravel area extends beyond the width of the garage creating a parking area. The
applicant is basically proposing to pave the existing gravel area, but also pave an area
adjacent to their deck. This area is currently part gravel and part grass. Approximately 16
feet of lawn will remain between the proposed parking pad and the south property line.
The proposed additional pavement increases the lot coverage to 52.8%. The location of the
garage deep in the rear yard and the length of the lot result in the need for a very long
driveway. Staff notes that the lot is smaller than standard which also contributes to the
higher degree of lot coverage. The existing lot coverage is approximately 51.3% which
includes the existing gravel areas.
Staff believes that a turnaround/parking pad is justified in this location, however, we have
some concerns about the amount of paving proposed. Staff discussed this with the applicant
who indicated that they have considered other pavement configurations, but believe the
proposed layout will best meet their needs.
Staff notes that the neighbors on both sides of the applicant have widened driveways.
No major objections or concerns were expressed by other staff. Engineering States that the
existing drainage patterns cannot be altered, noting that the additional pavement shall not
be higher than the existing ground.
Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 3
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
SUMNURYMCOMME i.DAIM
Staff has no major objections to this request noting that the lot location on Route 83
justifies a turnaround. In addition, the small lot size contributes to the need for a lot
coverage variation. Staff notes that the existing lot coverage exceeds the maximum allowed
and is only 1.5% less than the proposed lot coverage. However, staff suggest that the
applicant consider minimizing the amount of overall pavement.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning
DATE: October 25, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-69-SU-91, ZBA-70-V-91
John Graham (West Street Land Company - Citgo)
LOCATION: 606 West Northwest Highway
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use amendment and variation applications filed by John Graham (West Street
Land Company), The applicant is requesting the following:
1. An amendment to Special Use Ordinance #2572 per Section 14.2001 of the Mount
Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow modifications to the approved site plan.
2. Variations to:
a. Section 14.2002.A to allow a minimum setback of 10' for buildings and
structures. The Zoning Ordinance requires 30' setbacks.
b. Section 14.2002.E to allow a 0' parking lot setback at the closest point. The
Zoning Ordinance requires 30' setbacks.
C. Section 14.3012.A to allow 3 off-street parking spaces. The Zoning Ordinance
requires 8 parking spaces.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of October 24, 1991.
At the meeting, John Graham, President of West Street Land Company presented testimony
in support of the request. He explained that the proposed new convenience store and gas
pump/canopy are intended to upgrade the existing facility, physically and by doubling the
current customer capacity. He stated that they would be willing to meet the conditions
suggested by staff. He also indicated that he had spoken with the Illinois Department of
Transportation (IDOT) about the existing driveways accessing the site. He will conform
to IDOT's recommendation to make the driveway entrances narrower and at a 90 degree
angle to Northwest Highway.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that a Special Use permit was granted in 1976, allowing
a convenience gas station on this lot, subject to a specific site plan. Because the proposed
site plan is significantly different, the Special Use Ordinance must be amended to
incorporate the new site plan. In addition, the proposed site layout results in the need for
setback and parking variations. She noted that the 0' minimum parking lot setback
requested would be increased to 5' because the applicant decided to keep the existing 5'
setback along Northwest Highway.
She stated that staff does not have any major objections to the requested variations, but
recommends some conditions be added to the approval. These include:
1. Additional landscaping be provided along Fairview Road to create a more complete
screen and reduce the potential for litter to blow onto surrounding neighbor's
property.
2. The existing 6' wooden fence be repaired as necessary.
3. Two employee parking stalls be identified with striping. These spaces would be
separate from the 3 customer spaces shown on the site plan.
4. The rear facade of the building (facing Henry Street) be finished with a tan or brown
face brick which will make the building appear more residential in scale and
character. The applicant is proposing a split faced block on the rear elevation.
5. Any lighting on the building or in the parking lot be directed away from adjacent
residential areas.
6. The entrance drive aisles along Northwest Highway be reconfigured according to I -
DOT's recommendation.
The Zoning Board discussed the case and concurred with the conditions suggested by staff.
Accordingly, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of an
amendment to Special Use Ordinance #2572, per Section 14.2001 to include the proposed
new site plan.
Also, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the following
variations:
1. Section 14.2002.A to allow a minimum 10' setback for buildings and structures.
2. Section 14.2002.E to allow a minimum 5' parking lot setback.
3. Section 14.3012.A to allow 5 off-street parking spaces.
Approval is subject to the six conditions suggested by staff.
JF:cl
i �� r v �= 1 EkiST Rw El£1 f�4:EEri ,�
l
tiY i `'TiGKADE � - -
Ferri iD KErUr+�i J,nw,+�,: }ir � t
� ` s � ♦» r E_
r"
2ExrsT. dHiZU�fi #d) � �' � f�MYCtiis ' .
5 ex-sT TR— EYE -I :WEEI-1 {02`0.) ti t i
t
3 exl.T 1 E:,i ViX tN ihy Lt
[5 iil t_ :ai tAAvrN M jvti. t.'Nt tYEi
vvr o \ \ LLM
r `
�V
NO RTHWF4T N{4N WAY � h
} SFWt✓TrK. (dam+F.kSTLK(eM)
6 NEW H&C"YLW (3 N)
z KL+INATLD Tnu. c.+.GtN3
ww cFrfmau Ew.,
aO
� 8+ew rxctcaYcws (e`+tJ
y 3 Ex1>:T. LE(I pUDUb dkS+;b i; K)
3
w
Ot
LL
2 mqi T. LE,Gr��-Y,al; C.Ye.65c1+1a
i~Ri�nr�
stiv.`t9�JrLtNG LNtKdi?EGFL'.
2 [arc -T. ceuwaof, C.A"es ( i
`
to
+
'
t
s
��}}
F.
s
t
F
VIEW FROM RE5lDE—WTIAL TR ET
tt
i
:kT
tf
I`e
c
-
Lx VxI E pN
a..
t3
oil
.141
I r
� I I
T N - r -I C C�F 7�yj� 1 rf". '%I T_ F
IS P P 7 C
AB.`. E.INT,
Peter Lannon
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting an Amendment %o Special Use
Ordinance #2572 per Section 14.2001 of the Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance to allot.- modifications to the approved site
plan with the following variations to accommodate
construction of a new convenience store building, gas pump
islands and canopies:
q
nz Da t - tober 2 4
r � 1
J, a h n G r a. h a. m West Street Land
CO, i t'g o
L r El. P F, R'7
'Vest ,o r I. -I hi, -es t Higha%
S' L T C, I �,'TTr),'
OCtOber 8 , 1991
R ST
An Amendment to Special Use
Ordinance = 2572 per Section
14.2001 of the Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance to allow
modification to the approved
site plan with the following
variations to accommodate
construction of a new
--convenience store building, gas
pump islands and canopies:
Section 1.4.2002.A to allow a
minimum setback of 10' for
buildings and structures rather
than 30'; Section 14.2202.E to
allow a parking lot setback of
zero foot at the closest point,
rather'than 30'; Section
14.3012.A. to allow three off-
street parking spaces. The
Zoning Ordinance requires eight
off-street parking spaces.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
AB.`. E.INT,
Peter Lannon
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting an Amendment %o Special Use
Ordinance #2572 per Section 14.2001 of the Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance to allot.- modifications to the approved site
plan with the following variations to accommodate
construction of a new convenience store building, gas pump
islands and canopies:
q
7 tip A .. 9
73A -773A -7n. - ti �'y
lotober 21, l99a
. t Q W, l: w v Knimum sethra,."k of 10' for
}n K rd t r wr a „. s . The Zoning Ordinance require
.`." AAK, ti n VI l p,°."C" pd- r t nes aatbu'tkg a a;h ,,, ,M.
2. Rpyti"n 11,2202v a allow a parking lot setbauk of znr,�
,'aft an thecloses, point, The Zoning Ordinance requires a
a 'o , , t 'B k F"m a right -of -wan
w:1.3012.A e,a" allow threeoff-street parking
p a e. 6 . The Zoning '. d ';„ n a n c e requires ,
The t It .ve,ber, President of Wgst Street hand Co
, { : ,+: Z22
W t Street, ?.t.l"aertyvi,llet, presented his a e
',' .. ,w.xf Y68:. company ',"YGMn°x thec5.tggam station located
r n N µi f h : i:g h ;pd Fairview. M r:. Graham 'st.tea,t%"d. that he
..rr,,11 11ko to 'Vrqvjde,hLs customers with an updated fac Ll It
Hw ,,oLe.w: thAt the gas station was built. in 1975 and ,is now
tyddalvd. Mr. Graham a'batR"`^d that many of the cB.1"-i"tCYYatr=,rs use:.
rmanvy botween the hours of a" a.m.- 9 a.m. and
wA. p.m, and thit is h% 70% of the businessMe
! ed that zhe proposed new p2^, mps would double the a,: st ° g
,, tomoe it,
r V Farnham, Planner for the Village uf Mount Pros'p'ect:-,
stated that a Sp c_ i al {" ^-ars was granted its 1975 for
.w:s.t araa st.6atfibb. She stated 'that , alae proposed net,
Cts plan
arw s significantly diffY rent from the approved plan
and then -fare the Special Use Ordinance must be amended t,
aks..ind , the new site flan. The; new plan also requires setback
arta parking var anon%, The proposed site plan ewill. include ;.a
new 1,835 sal. ft. convenience store to be located parallel.
w,, Henry Stree=t:, in th* northeasteat`n part of the lot. The
..retia._ hui9ali:bag will comes as 10' from the nr.)rt.h lot line
ahn!Qng Henry Street for a length of 681. The building will
be lbw' in height and will have s brick exterior finish an the
front wand, sides. She noted that there will be white brick on
the front nt: of the bui'44ing and staffrecommends tan or brown
brick k an the hack factng the residentialarea. The existing
gas pumps and the 0' < ll' canopy will be replaced with foot -
pump islands under a W' x 11 8' canoPYThe canopy will be
?0' in overall heLght„cwith 16' of clearance underneath mating
that this should not create a 'visibi lty problem. She noted
`.hha,r the existing 5' wide palan'-ting area will remain between
ygg e° 4hw,�a,, c t'x,4t11i
ZBA-69-SU-91
ZBA-TO-V-9t
October 21, 1991
Page 2 of 5
11 V, T' rather than 0' a,,,"
n ,)Led that the parking "ill be slightQ-
r,nonfigu-1 1, inclide three new customer parking spaces,
W the yUht ing 25' setback frmn Far"iew rAll be.
maintained. The Zoning Ordinance dons not have a specific
pArking standnrd for convnnience/gas station type uses.
Thr reVre rhe general requiremenL of I stall per i,000 sq,.
ft. f building area is applied whidi resAts Q the need Wr
8 pNrk1L9 spaces
She stated that staff believes the 8 pump bay parking spaces
can he included as legitimate customer parking since most.
customers purchase gas. She noted. that staff had. concerns
ablout employee parking and requested. that two spaces be
Identified for employess, seperate from the Arse for
customer spaces. (3 customer; 2 employess; 8 pump bay) will..
he sufFiclent. A
She stated that staff discus^ ed. the landscaping with the
petitioner aho agreed to provide more screening along
Fairview. Staff received some calls from neighbors concerned
about loose papers and litter blowing from the station onto
their propoerty. Staff beleives: that additional shrubs along
Fairview will eliminate this probl"m.
Miss Farnham stated that the primary concern of the Planning
Dopartment, inspections, and Engineering is the utilization
of theexisting entrance drives off Northwest Highway, They-
are
heyare K,_I ry wide and at severe angles which could be a safety
hazard. she noted that the petitioner is not proposing to
change the openings but if this was a new development staff
would never approve these driveways. Staff recommends that
the entrances be narrowed and reconfigured so they meet
Northwest Highway at a 90 degree angle. Staff suggested that
the petitioner discuss this with IDOT which would have
,jurisdiction over these openings.
Miss Farnham noted staff suggests approval be conditioned on:
1. Additional landscape screening provided along Fariview
Road; 2. Striping of the employee parking spaces; 3. Any
lighting Dn the building or in the parking lot be directed
away from adjacent residential areas; 4. Requiring face brick
on the rear elevation preferably tan or brown brick; 5. Fence
to be repaired; 6. Driveway -entrance configuration conform to
!DOT recommendation.
Chairman Ba"snik questioned where the two employee parking
spaces will be located.
•g -t JO a40A s :fiq pazaau;a acajgak
Mjussg 'uci.x OMS `ggvad 'our: APS nan Ml:) 'I108 NC)cl,:l
papuoOOs 11vad •.ak °p.:aA= ura.s.^OIS "s'ak
-uold a"azs paAcaddr M 01 ulaqlx;aa'sAPOw "HE 01 a:auao°up.p O
XujucZ jaae'snad 4unON M 3o 1600f" uca'- OS aaia312Z w
aaa,uuurpaO as, IvIoadS o4 4uawp7uawp uv ao3 isenbea saauaz:,- 4ed
aadq juva,aa Oq UOIJ aw 'r, pal.1lu'.Laaquo, uaia-'� N, 'fczs'pg a-awa !vqj
^suc.-jgOaCgo ou puq :aur: OsT— Zj'41 paassi1;as"ppa uaTl
a.,'gsuadXO aaoui s M jJ q –s -z [allay.; 4T"14'4 p94 :qs
'GOUBJUjTp asoo u sj aaragq 3? pauoaagsani:a Mjusuc uumjjuqj
waapOUaigO U! LV7.:u apasal aa0w s! ! so bj:apq a qa 4
sav=ala,xc3 Illy tK;rn:uc ra i3ue, Ya"ruuu[rS -4s"; Pa.1s"I.. { �3 _ lk
a a .;a im Sq c.q j qa .al .0 ! a .a a a P i4 :p M.
Q,'a >p l I a a4; go aua,a <q4 un aR;°>olq q :aa.vj 41lds waajd p,da o,
jnr,. a;i ; -[le lasaair pa1no�, �aq sal ° pa�ala,is tiaa iqu,aD °.air.
'� a uCm S °. 1'q,,YA6�FG:7 a
° 3 3 P74 s Sq l :-r a as'. s ,a ,:a d S a 0 1 } .p la ax
,zaaqq,o zaaIq ..qI loom 111m jauap1jad aa%q 3r IvMs.0 ;.,ia,a:*rS
a:'rl toaga.,.l ,I 1aaram 'p;^uu su , j—,�'ap0 OU S–el.q
peue
u a I a a d u l x u ..a. q .q ..tin a s k a 1 a t o m wauu1p4nd v q 1 J, PyNss i g v ,.a z -J6,
1 fux.
a
a . a s . y m' U6 W y ai 1 slow l uU
p,aaa loci ,pa, M;'a'. 1M In alm
I.aw aq v aq: p<a c _ ,a wvgvao °.:q,
"f,' b,a . 9C I (:: Ipa l3..d u9
1014"o. MIS 04 :UHdB:::a"laUUj. sun U00DUOa 6.av q;W a':qb pup 6:rU01d,
.a� j u a.,adn, �, a�aI�Te; Quo rigs ,c,� g.� v r.orr a'P:. "s.�1�,
q � :3;.a � I� ,...
,w A;q q a a i r �¢ w �; ; S r, ° , n t, c�
,'e a ,
i ,,aq ILIN zaa.q; 4up poyE.v a.,T { a ".i sfA,
nbl +M {
N
2BA-69-SU-91
Z31 -70-V-91
October 21, 1991
Page 5 of 5
Chairman Basn& then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for the fol -lowing variation to
accommodate construction of a new convenience store building,
gas pump Wind sand canopies. From S,ction111.200,2-k to
a minimum setback of 10 for buildings amd nructures. SerMon
11.2202.E to allow a parking ]at setback of five foot at t0
closest point. And from SecLian 14.3012.,\ to allow 5 off-
sLreet papkirg sp2ops randiKuned on:
1. AddikWal landscape screening along Fairview Road per,
Staff approval.
2. Repair eNisting fence along Henry Street.
3. Striping of 2 employee parking spaces.
4. Drive aisle entrances reconfiguration conforming to !DOT
recommendation.
5. Any lighting on the building or in tae parking lot shall.
be directed away from adjacent residential areas.
6, Tan or brown face brick on rear facade.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Saviario, Prra.tt, Sk�-,,wron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote oF 4-0.
This Case must still be heard befw-e the Vil"4e Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
I
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois,
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNK CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: OCTOBER 14, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-69-SU-91, ZBA-70-V-91
APPLICANT: JOHN GRAHAM (WEST STREET LAND CO. - CITGO)
ADDRESS: 606 WEST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Business Retail & Service
LOT SIZE: 24,145 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 71.2%
F.A.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
REQUEST
Page 2
The applicant is request -ng an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #2572 per Section
14.2001 of the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance to allow modifications to the approved
site plan with the following variations to accommodate construction of a new convenience
store building, gas pump islands and canopies:
1. Section 14.2002.A to allow a minimum setback of 10 ft, for buildings and structures.
The Zoning Ordinance requires 30 ft. setbacks on all property lines abutting a right-
of-way.
Section 14.2002.E to allow a parking lot setback of zero foot at the closest point.
The Zoning Ordinance requires a 30 ft. setback from a right-of-way.
Section 14.3012.A to allow three off-street parking spaces. The Zoning Ordinance
requires eight off-street parking spaces
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a new Citgo Convenience
Store, gas pump islands and canopy at 606 West Northwest Highway. These modifications
significantly change the site plan approved when a Special Use permit was originally granted
in 1976 to allow a convenience gas station at this site. Subsequently, the original Special
Use Ordinance (#2572) must be amended to reflect the proposed changes. These site plan
changes result in the need for setback variations for the proposed new convenience store
and reconfigured g lot, and a variation to the off-street parking requirements.
parking;
A Special Use permit was granted in May 1976 to allow a Citgo Quick Mart facility on this
property in accordance with a specific site plan. That site plan includes the existing buildings
and gas pump island and six foot wood fence along the Henry Street lot frontage.
Proposed Site Plan and Variations
The proposed site plan will include a new 1,855 sq. ft. convenience store to be located
parallel to Henry Street, in the northeastern part of the lot. This building will replace the
existing 314 sq. ft. mini -mart and a 144 sq. ft. block storage building.
The existing gas pumps and 40'x 44' canopy will be replaced with four pump islands under
a 30' x 118' canopy. The proposed site plan utilizes the existing access drives off Northwest
Highway and Fairview Road. The parking lot will be redesigned to include three customer
parking spaces. In addition, the curb island in the southeast comer of the lot will be reduced
in size to Improve access to the new pump islands.
The existing site contains a fair amount of mature landscaping, particularly along the north
property line. The applicant is proposing to maintain as much of the existing landscaping
as possible. In addition, a 6 foot wood fence exists along the north property line along
Henry Street which was part of the original Special Use permit. This fence should be
maintained and repaired as necessary.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
Some of the plants in the southeast corner curb island will be removed as a result of
reducing the size of this island. If possible, these plants should be relocated on the site.
Staff notes that additional screening will be provided in the 25 ft. lawn area abutting Fairview
Road. Some concerns were expressed by neighbors about aesthetics and the potential for
litter to blow off-site. The landscape plan proposes an evergreen hedge next to the
convenience store and parking area. Two existing evergreen trees will be relocated to the
lawn area along Fairview. Some additional evergreen shrubs and ornamental plants will also
be added to provide screening at the northeast corner of the lot. Staff believes this will
provide an attractive landscape screen but suggests that additional plants be added to create
a more complete screen along Fairview.
Several variations are requested to accommodate the proposed site modifications. These
include:
Building - As proposed, the new building will come as close as
10 ft. from the north lot line abutting Henry Street for a length of 68 feet. The
Ordinance requires 30 ft. setbacks from all rights-of-way. Staff notes that the existing
storage building comes as close as 15 ft. to the north lot line. The new building
location meets or exceeds all other required setbacks.
The building will be 16 feet in height and will have a brick exterior finish on the
front and sides. The side facing Henry Street will be block faced and will not have
any entrances or window openings. Consideration should be given to requiring brick
on the rear elevation, as this would be more attractive to the single family home across
the street.
The edge of the new canopy will come as close as 18 feet from the south property
line along Northwest Highway. The Ordinance also requires the canopy to be set
back 30 ft. from the right-of-way. Staff notes that the existing canopy is only 16 ft.
from the south lot line.
The canopy will be 20 feet in overall height with 16 ft. of clearance underneath.
This should not create a visibility problem. The applicant should be aware that if
signage is proposed on the canopy, it may be subject to review by the Sign Review
Board.
2. Parking - The Ordinance requires a 30 ft. setback for parking lots
abutting a right-of-way. On the plan initially proposed, an existing 5 ft. wide planting
area between entrances on Northwest Highway was proposed to be removed to
provide additional drive aisle width, resulting in a zero foot setback from the south
lot line. However, the plan has been modified and the existing planting area will
remain. Staff notes that, while the parking area will be slightly reconfigured to
include three new customer parking spaces, the existing 25 ft. setback from Fairview
Road will be maintained.
3. Off -Street Parking Requirements - The proposed site plan provides three customer
parking stalls in addition to 8 pump bays. The Zoning Ordinance doesn't provide
specific standards for convenience/gas station type use. Consequently, the general
requirement of 4 stalls per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area is applied. Based on that
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 4
formula, 8 parking spaces are required to accommodate the 1,855 sq. ft. convenience
store. This formula does not recognize the pump bays as parking spaces, however,
with a convenience gas station use, staff believes it is appropriate to include pump
bay parking as customer parking.
Staff also believes that some parking spaces should be provided for customers not
purchasing gasoline. The three separate parking spaces proposed should provide
enough extra customer parking. However, staff has some concerns about employee
parking. The appdcant has indicated that a maximum of two employees would be
on-site at any one time. Separate parking spaces should be provided for employees
so they do not occupy the customer spaces. It is possible to create two parallel
parking stalls along the northwest edge of the parking lot. These should be striped
accordingly.
,OTHER DLLAGE STAFE COMM—E
Engineering and Inspection Services made several suggestions regarding the existing access
drives, including:
1. Reconfigure the drive aisles so they intersect Northwest. Highway at 90 degrees
rather than angled as existing.
2. Stripe the entrances to guide traffic --"Enter Only", "Exit Only" or Right Turn Out,
Left Turn Out, and One Lane In.
3. Shifting the entrance on Fairview north, to be farther away from the intersection with
Northwest Highway.
No other major objections or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
sUMMARYIRECOMMENDATION
Staff has no objections to the requested modifications to the site plan. Staff notes that it
would be difficult to develop this lot without variations due to it's triangular shape and that
it abuts street rights-of-way on all sides resulting in large setback requirements. It is
recommended that the petitioner address comments on revising the existing entrances, as
this matter was raised by Engineering and Inspection Services. While this is a cost con-
sideration, there may be benefits in modifying the driveways to a 90 degree angle. In addition,
staff believes that the proposed off-street parking (3 customer; 8 pump bays; 2 employee)
is adequate for the intended use. Staff suggests that approval be conditioned on:
1. Additional landscape screening provided along Fairview Road
2. Striping of the employe parking spaces
3. Directional striping of the entrance drive aisles,
4. Any lighting on the building or in the parking lot be directed away from adjacent
residential areas.
5. Requiring face brick on the rear elevation.
DMC:hg
OCTOBER 7TH, 1991
MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY COMMISSION
1. CALL TO ORDER
The Regular Meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called
to order at 7:30 P -M.
H. ROLL ALL
Present upon Roll Call:
Also present -
III. APPROVAL OF
Lee Beening, Chairman
Andy Mitchell, Commissioner
Art Coy, Commissioner
Chris Lenz, Commissioner
Tom Daley, Police Department
Del Ulreich, Fire Department
Drew Johanson, Engineering Dept.
Mayor Farley
IV NEW BUSINESS
A. The Safety Commission reviewed a request to make Emerson Street
and Milburn Avenue a 3 -WAY STOP. Presently, Milburn Avenue has
a STOP SIGN at Emerson Street.
The Commission members opinion of installing additional stop signs
could cause traffic to be backed up to the train tracks.
Recommendation for Denial was passed unanimously.
B. The Safety Commission reviewed a request for painted cross walks at
the Mt. Prospect Plaza. It was noted that this was private property.
The Commission recommended the resident contact the property owner
for his request.
C. The Safety Commission reviewed a request to remove the Sunday
Parking restriction on the 200 block of south Pine Street. It was the
Safety Commission opinion that the parking restriction remain to give
the Fire Department access in the event of an emergency and
recommended unanimously for denial.
V.ADJOURNME
Having no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Drew G. Johanson
DGJ:m
CAF/
10/28/91
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION REGARDING THE RELEASE
OF EXECUTIVE SESSION MINUTES
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect have met from time to time in executive session for
purposes authorized by the Illinois Open Meetings Act; and
WHEREAS, as required by the Act, the Village Board has kept written
minutes of all such executive sessions; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of Public Act 85-1355, the
Mayor and Board of Trustees have met in closed session to review
all closed session minutes; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees have determined that a
need for confidentiality still exists as to the executive session
minutes for the meetings as set forth on Schedule A attached
hereto; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees have further determined
that the minutes of the meetings as noted on Schedule "All attached
hereto no longer require confidential treatment and should be made
available for public inspection.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the executive session minutes from those
meetings as set forth on Schedule "All attached hereto are hereby
released.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby authorized and
directed to make said minutes available for inspection and copying
in accordance with the standing procedures of the Clerk's Office.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
4V4*&'1F
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
, 1991.
SCHEDULE A
Executive Sessions of the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect were held as listed below. The minutes
that have been determined may be released for public inspection are
indicated by "Release" and those determined as of a confidential
nature indicated by "Not For Release":
January 30, 1990
September 11, 1990
December 19, 1990
January 22, 1991
May 22, 1991
June 18, 1991
September 11, 1991
Not For Release
Not For Release
Not For Release
Not For Release
Release
Release
Release
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Directorrk'')'
DATE: October 29, 1991
SUBJECT: Request to Waive the Real Estate Transfer Tax for Participants
of the Home Ownership Made Easy Program
Attached is a letter and other information from Illinois State Treasurer Pat Quinn
explaining the Home Ownership Made Easy (H.O.M.E.) Program. The program en-
courages participants to save the down payment for a home purchase through a savings
plan which is exempt from the Illinois State Income Tax. Additionally, when the home is
actually purchased it is exempt from the Illinois State Transfer Tax. The participants must
not have owned a home for at least two years and they must have been participants in the
savings program at least three years.
Treasurer Quinn has requested municipalities that have a local transfer tax to waive the tax
for participants in the program. This would provide an additional incentive for potential
home owners to participate in the program. Granting the request to waive the tax for
H.O.M.E. participants would probably have a minimal impact on Village revenues, and it
would be consistent with the Comprehensive Affordable Housing Strategy that was recently
adopted.
An Ordinance which would provide for this exemption is attached.
DCJ/sm
L:06
TREASURER OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
CHICAGO 60601
PATRICK QUINN
TREASURER
October 9, 1991
Mr. David C. Jepson
Finance Officer
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056.3266
Re: Home Ownership Made Easy (H.O.M.E.)
Dear Mr. Jepson:
State of Illinois Center at Chicago
100 West Randolph - Suite 15-600
Chicago, Illinois 60601
(312) 81.4-3571
With an increasing number of young families unable to buy a home in the
community in which they grew up, the H.O.M.E. program is working to make home
ownership a reality.
I have enclosed the Home Ownership Made Easy brochure which outlines a
convenient way to save for the down payment and closing costs of a family's first home.
Also enclosed a fact sheet which answers many common questions about the H.O.M.E.
program.
The H.O.M.E. fund offers families benefits they would not find in other savings
plans. The interest earned on savings is exempt from all state income tax, and the state
legislature has voted to rebate the state's collection of the real estate transfer tax to the
buyer.* This will put dollars in a home buyer's pocket at the time they are needed most.
You can further encourage H.O.M.E. savings and stimulate the housing market in
your village if you and your village board would forgive your collection of the real estate
transfer tax for a buyer participating in H.O.M.E.
The long-term benefits of such a contribution to H.O.M.E. participants far
outweigh any short-term impact. Strong communities are created with new home owners
patronizing area businesses, increasing support for local schools, and becoming active in
civic and community affairs.
Lastly, I have enclosed a sample ordinance which shows how an ordinance
,charging the buyer can be amended to accommodate H.O.M.E. participants.
I welcome any suggestions or comments you may have on this proposal. A
member from my staff will contact you soon to discuss in detail the benefits of our
H.O.M.E. program.
Sincerely,
Patrick Quinn
Illinois State Treasurer
Enclosures
From the Ofj-tce of
Jr 40
the Illinois State Treasurer
.NEVVIZP PATRICKQUINN W.
Springfield, LL 62706 - 217/782-2211
Is,
Home Ownership Made Easy
Kollan WRIJ 47-1.71
What is the H.O.M.E. Program?
Home Ownership Made Easy (H.O.M.E.) is a personal savings program designed to
help people buy their first home. Participants who save money in the H.O.M.E.
program for a minimum of three ygars will receive three key benefits:
1) Any income the account earns will be exempt from the state income tax provided
the funds are used to purchase a home.
2) The state real estate transfer tax (which is paid by the seller at a rate of 0.1% of
the purchase price) is paid to the participants after they purchase a home.
3) In addition, those participants who are interested in the Illinois Housing
Development Authority's (IHDA) low interest mortgages for first time home buyers
will receive priority, if they meet IHDA!s requirements.
Who can open a H.O.M.E. account?
Any Illinois resident age 18 or older, regardless of income, who has not owned a
home for two years.
How much money is required to start?
You can open a H.O.M.E. savings account with an initial deposit of $250 or more.
Do I have to make monthly deposits?
No. You need only make two deposits per year of $50 or more for three years to
receive the full benefits of the H.O.M.E. Prograrn. It is up to the investors to decide
what savings schedule will best fit their needs. You can arrange to have deposits
made automatically from your checking account, or use a coupon book to make
regular payments.
H.O.M.E. Questions and Answers
Page 2
Can I withdraw my money if I need it?
Yes. You can withdraw all or part of the money in your account at any time, as long
as you do not make more than two withdrawals per year. You must maintain a
minimum balance of $250 per year.
Has anyone invested in this fund yet?
The State of Illinois has deposited $50 million in the H.O.M.E. fund to provide it
with a sound capital base.
What is the State Treasurer's role?
The State Treasurer is the administrator of the H.O.M.E. program.
Who will invest the money?
The Winsbury Co., a registered securities firm will manage the investments.
Why was the Winsbury Co. selected?
The Winsbury Co. is well-known in the financial community for its quality work with
many other financial institutions. Winsbury is known for its conservative investment
money management practices.
What will be the yield on the H.O.M.E. Fund?
Information on the yield and other aspects of the Fund are addressed in the
prospectus which is included with each application packet. The State Treasurer's
office is restricted by federal Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules
against discussing the future performance and investments of the H.O.M.E. fund.
Only a registered securities broker can discuss these details with applicants.
Individual investors will need to read the prospectus and make their own decision
about investing in the H.O.M.E. Fund.
How do I get an application form for the H.O.M.E. Program?
Telephone 1-800-535-1164 from 9 a.nL to 5 p.nL to request an application packet and
a H.O.M.E. Fund prospectus.
0.0. �1. E.
4t'l U t'?i 4r,
G
V'A towlt.
❑ SAVINGS
H.O.M.E. will help you save for
your down payment.
❑ AFFORDABILITY
Save at your own pace; open
a H.O.M.E. account with as little
as $250.
❑ CONVENIENCE
You choose your method of
payment: monthly, quarterly or
semi-annually, with monthly
statements keeping you up on
account activity.
Printed on Recycled Paper with Soybean Ink
by Authority of the Stste of Illinois
by the state Treasurer
9191 $M
Home Ownership Made Easy
PATRICK QUINN
TREASURER OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS
What is H.O.M.E.? How do I quality for H.O.M.E.? How do I sign up?
Home Ownership Made Easy is a secure
savings program designed to help first-time
homebuyers put aside funds for a down -
payment.
Your money will be invested in a mutual fund
called The H.O.M.E. Fund, managed by The
Winsbury Company, a registered securities
broker. A prospectus for the H.O.M.E. Fund is
included with the application packet and should
be read prior to investing.
How will H.O.M.E. help me buy my
first house?
J Enroll in the H.O.M.E. program with a
minimum initial deposit of $250 — well
below the average minimum deposit
needed to open an interest -generating
money market mutual fund.
J Each H.O.M.E. member will receive a
monthly statement detailing balance,
interest earned, deposits and withdrawals,
and the latest interest rates paid on your
account.
U You may make deposits as often as you
like, at least twice a year.
U You may make withdrawals up to twice a
year
To enroll in H.O.M.E., you must be an Illinois
resident at least 18 years of age. In addition,
you must be either a first time homebuyer, or not
have owned a home in the last two years.
It's up to you to select a method of making
deposits. You may chose automatic withdrawals
from your checking account, or use a coupon
book to mail in payments monthly, quarterly or
semi-annually.
Once enrolled, you must stay a member of
H.O.M.E. for at least three years to receive full
benefit of the program.
What other advantages does H.O.M.E.
offer?
U When your H.O.M.E. money is used for a
home purchase, dividends are exempt from
all state income tax.
U The state real estate transfer tax will be paid
to you when you purchase a home.
J If interested in the Illinois Housing
Development Authority's (IHDA) low-interest
loan program, you will receive priority
consideration if you meet IHDA's separate
program requirements.
For an application, call the H.O.M.E. hotline
at:
1 - 800 - 535 -1164
When completed, mail your application and
initial deposit of $250 to:
The H.O.M.E. Fund
P. O. Box 19473
Springfield, IL 62794-9473
How can t learn more about
H.O.M.E.?
Representatives are on duty from 9:00 a.m.
to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday on the
H.O.M.E. hotline to answer any questions
you may have.
CAF/
10/29/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VIII OF CHAPTER 8
ENTITLED "REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX" OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, there are an increasing number of families desirous of
buying a home in the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, due to the costs involved, it becomes increasingly
difficult to afford home ownership; and
WHEREAS, the Treasurer of the State of Illinois has initiated the
Home Ownership Made Easy (H.O.M.E) Program in an effort to both
encourage and enable individuals to purchase homes; and
WHEREAS, in an effort to cooperate with the State Treasurer in the
H.O.M.E. Program, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount
Prospect have determined that it would be in the best interests of
the Village to exempt the Real Estate Transfer Tax adopted by the
corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect for anyone
participating in the H.O.M.E. Program.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT BE ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 8.806 of Article VIII entitled "Real
Estate Transfer Tax" of Chapter 8 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto
the paragraph I'Ll'; so that hereinafter said Section 8.806 (Exempt
Transactions) shall include the following:
L. Transactions in which the purchaser is a participant in the
Illinois Home ownership Made Easy (H.O.M.E.) Program, 67-1/2
Ill.Rev.Stat. 1101 getj--as�e. and is certified to receive program
benefits under 67-1/2 Ill.Rev.Stat. 1107 (Sect. 7 of the
Act)."
SECTION TWO:. That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to forward
a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Cook County Clerk and the
Office of the Treasurer of the State of Illinois.
SECTION THREE:, That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1991.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk
FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE: October 21, 1991 JJJ
SUBJECT: SPOT NOT CAR WASH
KENSINGTON AND RIVER ROAD
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
/m
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
:PROJECT: SPOT NQT CAR WASH
LOCATION: KENSINgTON AND RIVER RQAD - NW CORNER
DATE: 10/15/ 991
YES
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED
:PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
.AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING Mir
APPROVAL f —
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN N/A FT. N/A .,,.,-SIZE
SANITARY SEWER N/A FT. N/A SIZE
STORM SEWER
HZA FT. _ N/A SIZE
ROADWAYS N/A
SIDEWALKS 362 SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS NZA
STREET LIGHTS N/A # NZA
PARKWAY TREES N/A
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING YES
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
WATER MAIN 4 65l
SANITARY SEWER 811 - 32,.'..
STORM SEWER 3" - 551 .... ....... - 12#1 -.216 1
ROADWAY N/A __
PARKING LOTS N/A
LANDSCAPING YES
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS YES
NO
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS _DAY OF , 1991.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk �.--
FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE: October 28, 1991
SUBJECT: Nicholas 0111ce Building
240 E. Lincoln Street
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
J'W/M
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: Ni_qholAs Of fi
LOCATION: 240 E. Lincoln Street
DATE: October ll ,_ -12-91
YES
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS EORCCEPT C BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN N/A FT. N/A SIZE
SANITARY SEWER N/A FT. N/A SIZE
STORM SEWER NI A FT. NZA_ SIZE
ROADWAYS N/A
SIDEWALKS 325 SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS N/A
STREET LIGHTS N/A N/A
PARKWAY TREES N/A N/A_
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING COMPLETE
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS NZA
WATER MAIN 2251- 8" 25' - 6"
SANITARY SEWER 20' - 6"
STORM SEWER 100'- 36" 3001 - 24'_' 1851- 1"
ROADWAY _,_ -NSA
PARKING LOTS _ "- Q- SQ. YDS.
LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS _N/A
NO
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF .,, , 1991.
r
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
TM crry USA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
REVISED
TO: village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director of Public Works
DATE: October 30, 1991
SUBJECT: Fuel Bid Opening
On October 29, 1991 sealed bids were opened for the proposed purchase
of unleaded gasoline and diesel fuel for all Village vehicles. The one
year contract is for estimated quantities of 123,000 gallons of
unleaded gasoline and 32,000 gallons of diesel fuel.
Invitational bids were mailed to 16 vendors and a bid notice was placed
in local papers. Five bids were received with vendors using the Oil
Price Information Service (OPTS) or Oil Express Daily data sheets for
pricing verification.
Bid specifications requested pricing for four (4) grades of unleaded
gasolines and No. 2 diesel fuel. Although the Village reserves the
right to purchase any grade of fuel during the term of the agreement, I
recommend the contract award be based on pricing for regular lead-free
(87 octane), midgrade lead-free (89 octane), and No. 2 diesel.
As a result of the successful police vehicle performance tests
utilizing lower octane gasolines, I believe it is a viable and prudent
option for the Village to fuel appropriate vehicles and equipment with
37 and 89 octane unleaded. The attached bid tabulation was compiled
based on a 50/50 distribution of the 123,000 gallon yearly unleaded
estimate and full allocation of the 32,000 gallon diesel estimate.
Bidders were ranked by their estimated annual cost totals.
Accordingly, Lake -Cook Farmy Supply appears to be the low -bidder for
all the requisite grades of fuel.
It is my recommendation that the new 1991/1992 fuel contract be awarded
to .Lake -Cook Farm Supply Company of Palatine, Illinois.21
Glen R. Ander
c: Police Chief
Fire Chief
October 29, 1991
Fuel Bid Opening Results
Bidder,
Regular NL X87} Midgrade NL (84)
Premium NL (92) j Premium NL (9d
jj
No. 2 Diesel Freight j
Discount .
Estimated
Annuol Cost
Lake - Cook Form
0.635 0.6651 0.7146 no bid 0.6539 Included
none
$100,881
Sweeney Oil
0.6372 0.6685 0.7163 0,7217 0.6613 included
none
$101,462
Wright Industries
0.6574 0.6844 0.7374 0.7849 0.682 Included
none
$104,652
Royal Fuel
0.6439 0.677 0.7285 0.7685 0.6635 0.015
0.01
$104,792
Bell Fuels
0.66 0.69 0.741 no bid 0.6696 0.02
none
$107,552
Estimated Yearly Cost Formula: Regular NL (87) price X 61,500 gallons = Reg. NL Estimate
Midgrade NL (89) price X 61,500 gallons= MG NL Estimate
No. 2 Diesel price X 32,000 gallons = Diesel Estimate.
Reg NL Estimate + MG NL Estimate + Diesel Estimate = Estimated Annual Cost
Pricing does not include applicable taxes per gallon:
GASOLINE DIESEL
STATE 0.19 0.215
COUNTY 0.06 no tax
FEDERAL 0.141 no tax
IUSTT 0.003 0.003
IUSTT: Illinois Underground Storage Tank Tax
All prices except estimated annual cost are shown In dollars per gallon.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
6
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 25, 1991
SUBJECT: Study Proposals for Evaluation of Storm Water
Detention Basins in OPUS
Recently, the Village Board discussed maintenance responsibility
of storm water detention basins within the Opus business park.
In the past, maintenance responsibilities have, for the most
part, been undertaken by Opus Development Corporation, with some
areas assumed by the Village under an annexation agreement.
Following the expiration of this agreement, the business associa-
tion is apparently looking for the village to assume more of
these maintenance obligations.
On October 10, 1991, 1 sent requests for proposals to three
consulting engineers for a study on storm water detention basins
at Opus. The study was to include the following:
All issues relative to the depth of the ponds and their
compliance with the original design and whether or not
siltation has created the need for cleaning.
Review all data relevant to the shallow wells which were
installed by Opus to maintain water quality in the ponds,
and determine if these wells are of sufficient capacity to
accomplish their intended purpose. Also, ascertain if the
drilled depth of these wells is sufficient to continue
pumping for the foreseeable future. Project energy costs
for running these wells, and provide a maintenance budget
figure for repair of these wells for the next ten years.
Check the quality of the water and give recommendations to
the Village for the proper chemicals to use to control
algae growth and weeds without harmful effects to aquatic
and wildlife. Prepare a master map outlining the entire
storm sewer system and how the.ponds areinterconnected.
Take samples of the mud at the bottom of select ponds to
determine if any of the factories or businesses within the
Opus business park have discharged toxic or hazardous ma-
terials, the removal of which could, in future years, cost
the Village exorbitant fees.
Costs for this study to include a comprehensive report, I
presentation to the Village Board, and presentation to the
business association of Opus if so directed.
The following firms submitted their proposals:
Camp Dresser & McKee $22,000
CRSS of Illinois, Inc. $25,000
Envirodyne Engineers $32,020
I recommend acceptance of the proposal from Camp Dresser & McKee
for the base study. In addition, I recommend that they take a
minimum of three samples of the sedimentation out of different
ponds at a cost of $500 per sample for analysis. Thus, their
total proposal would be in an amount not toexceed$23,500.
Herbert L. � Weeks
HLW/td
KENSINGT.PND/FILES/COMMDEV
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE-. October 24, 1991
SUBJECT: Maple Street Reconstruction/Rehabilitation
In the early 1970's, the Mount Prospect State Bank constructed their
new building at the corner of Maple and Busse. Part of their construc-
tion costs included widening Maple Street between Busse and the old
Public Safety building property.
The street at that point is 33' back of curb to back of curb. From
Busse to Central on Maple, it remained at a 25' width, which is 81
narrower. This narrower -width street has caused problems for my main-
tenance vehicles getting through, especially when cars are parked on
both sides of the street at night and on weekends. It is my under-
standing that Fire and Police vehicles have had the same type of prob-
lems and concerns.
In my memorandum of October 3, 1991, 1 had recommended that, for the
1992 construction season, consideration should be given to include the
reconstruction and widening of Maple Street between Busse Avenue and
Central to equal the 33' width. This curb is in poor shape and the
roadway for the complete distance between Central and Northwest High-
way needs restoration. As part of the reconstruction/rehabilitation,
I had recommended that review should be made of the intersection of
Maple, Northwest Highway and Evergreen and some reconfiguration of
that intersection should be done as a part of the reconstruction
work. I have received quotes from five consulting engineering firms
for this work. Information as follows:
adjusted from proposal to correct math
If lighting option is approved, that would be added to the total.
As you will note, street lighting is included as an option only be-
tween Busse Avenue and Northwest Highway. Improved lightifig in this
Engineering
Construction
Optional
Design
Inspection
Total
Lighting**
Donohue & Associates
$17,500
$12,500
$30,000
$4,500
Pavia-Marting Co.
15,700
18,200
33,900
3,780
H.W. Lochner Inc.
19,600
18,400
38,000
2,400
Ciorba Group Inc.
24,200
36,300
60,500
1,500
Triton Consultants
32,671
28,265
60,936*
9,753
adjusted from proposal to correct math
If lighting option is approved, that would be added to the total.
As you will note, street lighting is included as an option only be-
tween Busse Avenue and Northwest Highway. Improved lightifig in this
Qne-block area may be beneficial for patrons of not only the Public
Safety building and the bank, but also for the Historical Society. I
would not suggest additional lighting north of Busse to Central.
I recommend acceptance of the proposal as submitted by Donohue & Asso-
ciates in an amount not to exceed $30,000 for reconstruction and reha-
bilitation of the roadway and curbing. This is for design and con-
struction inspection. An additional $4500 for design and construction
inspection of a street light system would be an option that should be
considered.
As part of the proposal, the engineer will furnish the Village with
three alternates to the reconstruction of the intersection of Maple,
Northwest Highway and Evergreen. These alternatives will then be
brought back to the Village for selection of the one most favorable.
All. construction work for improvements at that intersection will be
coordinated with the construction of the new Public Safety building.
Proposed construction cost of the road improvement is approximately
$1i'0,000. However, adding street lighting to the one -block area could
increase construction cost by $46,500.
I would recommend that the street improvement costs be funded by the
Motor Fuel Tax Account and, if the street light option is selected,
that could be under the General Fund Account. If this project is
approved, the engineering fees would come out of the current budget
and construction costs budgeted in the 1992-93 budget. Projected
completion of the project would be the fall of 1992.
Ito
1416ut 5-,T tu
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
MAPLEREH.AB/FILES/STREETS
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
4e, INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 21, 1991
SUBJECT: Proposals for Construction Testing and Inspection
Services of Materials for New Public Safety Bldg.
I= CM USA
Working in conjunction with Donohue & Associates, proposals were
Solicited from five firms who perform construction and material
testing services. Services they perform involve compaction of
controlled fill and backfill; concrete testing of foundation and
walls; testing of paving, concrete slab floor, masonry grout,
and steel; and final report review. The fees as listed below
are estimated and, due to the difficulties of defining the pre-
cise scope of work, it is customary to pay for it on a time and
expenses basis. The estimated proposals we have requested serve
to establish a budget.
Trow Mirza Consulting Engineers $11,000
Professional Service Industries, Inc. $11,057
Seeco Consultants Inc. $11,400
Testing service Corporation $12,450
Terracon Consultants NE, Inc. $15,474
It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Trow Mirza.
Their schedule of charges are based upon their unit rates, with
an estimated maximum of $11,000. In the event that project
conditions are more difficult than originally anticipated, a
change order would be requested whether we use this firm's ser-
vices or any of the others as outlined.
COPY of Donohue recommendation is attached.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
PS-MAT'L.SER/FILES/BUILDING
October 18, 1991
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Village of Mount Prospect
Dept. of Public Works
1700 W. Central Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Public Safety FacLlity
Donohue Project No. 18259.400
Dear Mr. Weeks:
We reviewed the five proposals for
services received on October 15, 1991.
$11,000 to $15,474. The majority of
amount.
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS
construction testing and inspection
Their estimated total fees ranged from
estimated fees were close to the lower
After analyzing the p=oposals, we recommend that you award the contract to
Trow Mirza Consulting Engineers.
They are a reputable firm, and their unit costs for time, tests and expenses
were the most favorable of the five firmsconsidered. Also, their estimated
total fee of $11,000 was the lowest one.
Due to the difficulties in defining the precise scope of this type of work, it
is customary to pay for it on a time and expenses basis. The total estimated
fee can only serve to establish a budget.
We recommend that you award the contract based on unit rates given on Trow
Mirza's Schedule of Charges, with a not -to -exceed maximum of $11,000. In the
event that project conditions prove to be more difficult than expected, a
change order can be issued.
If you have any questions, please call the undersigned at 708/605-8800 ext. 171.
Very truly yours,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Naras Statkus
Project Manager
NS/dk
T/L/OV7
11 MI Hbodfwld Road, SuUe 200 Fav, Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 N 70&605.8800 8 rax M6G5.8914
Prinled on
. ded paper.