Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4328_001
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Next Ordinance No. 4358 Next Resolution Na. 35-91 A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D E R 0 P B U 8 1 N E S S REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Room, 1st Floor Senior Citizen Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday October 15, 1991 7:30 P. M. II. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip" Parley Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros Trustee George Clowes Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee irvana Wilks ALL III. INVOCATION - Trustee Clowes /#fijjjjj1, October 15, 1991 IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, October 1, 1992 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VII. MAYORfS REPORT A. PRESENTATION: Ralph Stadler, member of the Mount Prospect Volunteer Fire Department retiring following 25 years of service. B. EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: Fire Department C. PRESENTATION: Citizens recognized for lifesaving actions D. PRESENTATION: Meritorious Service Awards to members of the Mount Prospect Fire Department E. Dedication of the Roger Neitzke Memorial Plaque, acknowledging members the Volunteer Fire Department F. PRESENTATION: Fire Prevention Week Poster Contest Awards VIII. OLD BUSINESS IX. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 33-V-91, 1623 Cedar Lane The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a sideyard of 7 feet, rather than the required 10 feet; a rear yard setback of 7 feet, rather than the required 15 feet; and, a zero foot separation between the pool deck and house deck, in order to allow an existing above ground swimming pool and deck. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying these requests by a vote of 2-4. B. ZBA 57-A-91 and ZBA 58-5U-91, 1028 S. Elmhurst Road 1. The petitioner, Walgreens, is requesting a text amendment to the Zoning ordinance to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a Special Use in a B-1 Shopping Center District. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. 2. The Petitioner is also requesting a variation to allow the installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna on the store located at 1028 S. Elmhurst Road. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. C. ZBA 60-V-91, 219 South Leonard The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a 2-1/2 foot side yard setback for a shed, rather than the required 5 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals vote of 3-3 resulted in a recommendation to deny the request. D. ZBA 51-V-91, 1631 Greenwood Avenue The Petitioner is requesting variations to accommodate a circular driveway and to allow a 45% front yard lot coverage, rather than the permitted 35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. E. ZBA 62-V-91, 108 North Main Street The Petitioner is requesting variations to accommodate a circular driveway and to allow a 45.7% front yard lot coverage, rather than the 35% permitted. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. F. ZBA 63-V-91, 8 South Busse Road The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a 484 square foot accessory structure (shed) rather than the 120 square feet permitted. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. G. ZBA 64 -SU -91, Sol W. Algonquin Road The Petitioner is requesting an amendment to the existing Planned Unit DeveloPMOnt for the Rogers Corporate Park to add newly acquired property. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. H. ZBA-65-SU-91, 400 East Blue Jay Court The Petitioner is requesting an amendment to the existing Planned Unit Development to allow patios on specific townhomes within this development, resulting in a 10 feet encroachment into the perimeter yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. I. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDS ORDINANCE NO. 4257 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1002 PROSPECT MANOR This Ordinance deletes the one year effective date, which was cited in error, since that requirement does not apply to a Special Use. J. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS This Resolution authorizes funds to be transferred into the Single Family Rehabilitation Fund. K. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE REDUCING THE 9-1-1 SURCHARGE This Ordinance authorizes the .75 surcharge for the Enhanced 9-1-1 emergency response system to be reduced to .30. L. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND BROADACRE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE DOWNTOWN DISTRICT M. A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE COMPREHENSIVE HOUSING AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY (CHAS) FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION A. Review minutes of previous Executive Sessions to determined which minutes may be released. B. Litigation XIII. ADJOURNMENT (Exhibit A) (Exhibit B) (Exhibit C) (Exhibit E) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT OCTOBER 1, 1991 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Village Clerk Carol Fields called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee George Clowes Trustee Paul Hoefert Trustee Leo Floras Trustee Irvana Wilks Absent: Mayor Gerald Farley The Village Clerk asked for nominations for the position of President Pro Tem. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to appoint Trustee Leo Floros as President Pro Tem. There being no additional nominations, the Clerk called for a vote on the motion. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Busse. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to APPROVE approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MINUTES Mayor and Board of Trustees held September 17, 1991. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Pass: Corcoran Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Hoefert, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved APPROVE BILLS to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 540,368 Motor Fuel Tax Fund - Community Development Block Grant Fund 9,187 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 10,007 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 67,932 Parking System Revenue Fund 1,704 Risk Management Fund 23,409 Vehicle Replacement Fund 1,805 Motor Equipment Pool Fund - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep. Fund 6,112 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1985 14,406 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1991 2,397 Fire & Police Building Const. 15,624 Flood Control Revenue Fund 33,540 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - Debt Service Funds 194 Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund 99,061 Police Pension Fund 41,445 Firemen's Pension Fund 46,461 Benefit Trust Fund - $ 913,652 PROCLAMATION: CRIME PREVENTION MONTH EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION: POLICE DEPT. PROCLAMATION: FIRE PREVENTION WEEK RECOGNITION: NATOA AWARD Upon roll call: Ayes: Motion carried. Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks None COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. MAYOR'S REPORT Acting Mayor Floros proclaimed the month of October as Crime Prevention Month in Mount Prospect. Acting mayor Floros and Police Chief Pavlock acknowledged the following employees, in conjunction with the annual quinquennial anniversaries: Roland B. L. Richard E. I Anthony J. Michael E. Anthony Hale Marilyn Kan, Lance K. Be Kimberley J Ronald W. P Janice A. D Virjean M. John D. Gro Catherine M Robert L. R Richard S. Acting Mayor Flo through 12, 199 Prospect. Acting mayor I Human Service of the Natic officers and offered by the V Village's local Schalk eller cat lar alatino choulis 1 thof f Nagel vlock ley i Blasi s Lutze epecki ullivant 25 years 25 years 20 years 20 years 15 years 15 years 10 years 10 years 10 years 10 years 10 years 5 years 5 years 5 years 5 years 3s proclaimed the week of October 8 as Fire Prevention Week in Mount �s recognized the Communications and Lsions of the village as recipients Association of Telecommunications cors Special Achievement Award for ftming. it was noted that the Humar arovides programs on various services Lage and which are broadcast over the �vernment access channel. DONATION: Acting Mayor Floros, noted that NTN Bearing Corporation, NTN BEARING TO has opened an office, located within the Kensington HISTORICAL MUSEUMBusiness Center. Mr. Floros stated that as a gesturc BUILDING PROJECT to the community, NTN Bearing Corporation is donating $20,000-00 to be used for the Historical MuseuM building project. OLD BUSINESS for second reading that AMEND CH. 16: An ordinance was presented DETENTION would amend Section 16'.450—F.1 of Chapter 16 relative to required detention facilities for commercial, industrial and multi -family developments. Trustees Wilks and Clowes expressed concern relative to the proposed amendment, stating that it could place a burden on developers, possibly adding additional costs for housing. It was suggested that tbis requirement be reviewed in 2 years in order to evaluate the impact on developers. Page 2 - October i, 1991 Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to amend the proposed Ordinance to provide for reviewing the detention requirements, as set forth, in 2 years. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ORD.NO. 4352 for passage of Ordinance No. 4352, as amended AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) RELATIVE TO DETENTION REQUIREMENTS Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS An ordinance was presented for first reading that CLOSE OUT would authorize closing certain Special Service SPECIAL Area bond and interest fund accounts and transfering SERVICE the funds from those accounts into Capital AREA ACCOUNTS Improvement Fund. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert,'Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for ORD.NO. 4353 for passage of ordinance No. 4353 AN ORDINANCE TO CLOSE OUT CERTAIN SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BOND AND INTEREST FUND ACCOUNTS MAINTAINED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, AND TO AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER OF EXCESS FUNDS ON HAND IN SAID ACCOUNTS Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. An ordinance was presented for first reading that would CLOSE OUT authorize the insurance reserve bond and interest fund INSURANCE account to be closed and funds transferred to the RESERVE Capital Improvement Fund. BOND & INTEREST FUND Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 3 - October 1, 1991 ORD.NO. 4354 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4354 AN ORDINANCE TO CLOSE OUT THE INSURANCE RESERVE BOND AND INTEREST FUND ACCOUNT MAINTAINED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS AND TO AUTHORIZE THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS ON HAND IN SAID ACCOUNT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. SELL VEHICLE: An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AUCTION authorize one additional vehicle to be sold as part of the auction to be conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference at the Mount Prospect Public Works facility on October 19th. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse,, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO,. 4355 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4355 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF VILLAGE OWNED PROPERTY Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. SELL SURPLUS: An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would DEFIBRILLATOR authorize the sale of one Life Pac 5 defibrillator and monitor to the highest bidder. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4356 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4356 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Page 4 - October 1,, 1991 An Ordinance was presented for first reading AMEND CH. 18 that would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) to delete the speed limit of 25 MPH from the Village Code, retaining the correct speed limit of 20 MPH. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved ORD.NO. 4357 for passage of Ordinance No. 4357 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XX OF CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT A request was presented to approve Change Order No. 2 BUSSE AVE for the Busse Avenue municipal parking lot improvement PARKING LOT located at the northeast corner of Busse Avenue and IMPROVEMENT: Main Street. CHANGE WORK ORDER NO. 2 It was noted that with the acquisition of the additional land the parking lot has been improved to provide additional parking spaces and landscaping, as well as connecting the adjoining parking lot serving the Senior Citizen Center. Utility lines were installed underground, however, due to the fact that Commonwealth Edison did not anticipate an additional line from the transformer to two existing parking lot lights, it is necessary to install two 311 conduit to activate the lights. The cost for the additional work being the subject of Change Order No. 2 will be $7,079.00 and will be done by the existing contractor, Jacobs construction. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and approve change Work Order No. 2 for the Busse Avenue municipal parking lot at a cost not to exceed $7,079.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Nays: Motion carried. Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks None Village Manager Dixon presented the following bid results for the construction of the new Fire and Page 5 - October 1, 1991 BID RESULTS: FIRE & POLICE BUILDING Police Station at 112 East Northwest Highway. CONSTRUCTION CEREMONY Bidder Amount A. J. Maggio Co. $4,673,000 Slezak Construction Co. 4,701,000 Ilice Construction Co. 4,785,541 Richard Hoffman Corp. 4,968,000 George Sollitt Construction Co. 4,997,000 B. Stro berg Construction Co- 5,027,763 Glenn H. Johnson Construction Co. 5,175,000 Krofl Construction Co. 5,2.65,600 John Burns Construction Co. 5,312,000 Gerhardt F. Meyne Co. 5,335,000 Burnside Construction 5,481,539 Mr. Dixon noted that these bid results fall below the bid estimate of $5,737,900.00, established by Donahue and Associates. it was also noted that the credentials for the apparent ;low bidder, A. J. Maggio Co., .have been checked and everythingappears in good order. A.J.MAGGIO Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to accept the low qualified bid submitted by A. J. Maggio Company, Mount Prospect, for the construction of the new Fire and Police Building at 112 East. Northwest Highway in an amount not to exceed $4,673,000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, Hoefert, Wilks Mays: None Motion carried. GROUNDBREAKING Mr. Dixon stated that a groundbreaking ceremony will CEREMONY be held on Friday, October 1.1th at 7:30 AM. CHANGE ORDER The Village Manager stated that Herb Weeks, Director DISCRETION of Public Works, and he would be the project managers for construction of the new Fire and Police Building and asked that fir. Weeks' be given permission to authorize change orders from the original plans, if, necessary, up to an amount of $10,000.00 per change. Trustee Corcoran,' seconded by Trustee Busse,;, moved to authorize Herb Weeks the discretion of authorising change orders for the new Fire and Police Building up to $10,000 per change order. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Clowes, oefert, Wilks Nays: None Motion carried. TORNADO SIREN Mr. Dixon announced that the tornado emergency siren, formerly located at 112 East Northwest Highway, is now ,Located in the Village Hall parking lot and i:3 operational. ROADWAY It was also noted that the roadway, improvements have IMPROVEMENTS been delayed due to the fact that the equipment used by Arrow Road Construction has been used at other sites. Penalties are being assessed for delay. It is anticipated that all the improvements will to complete by October 11th,' Page 6 - October 1, 1991 Trustee Clowes requested the Village Manager place SIGN discussion of the Sign Ordinance on a future Committee ORDINANCE of the Whole agenda for review. Trustee Clowes REVIEW noted that the deadline of January 1, 1992 for all signs to conform with the Sign Ordinance is close at hand, and since the Sign Review Board is proposing changes to the Ordinance, it would be appropriate for the Village Board to discuss existing and proposed amendments. A report was distributed from the R.A.P.P. Committee RAPP REPORT relative to alternate activities for teenagers. Police Chief Pavlock is the Chairman of this regional Committee. Trustee Hoefert asked for a brief update on the ACQUISITION: the redevelopment of the downtown district, TIF including land acquisition. Mr. Dixon stated that negotiations are still underway to purchase the Hueckers Gas Station and Prospect Auto Body. Also, the owners of Northwest Electric are working with the Village as to plans to remodel that building. Mr. Dixon stated that the owner of the Aldi's building ALDI'S has approached the Village as to whether the Village BUILDING: would be interested in purchasing the property for NORTHWEST HWY inclusion in the TIF District. ADJOURNMENT Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ADJOURN to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:57 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 7 - October 1, 1991 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION October 10, 1991 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 10/01/91 through Per Attached Journal Balance 10101191 10710191 List of Bills Entry 10/10/91 General & S»ecial Revenue Funds General Fund $ 3,514,512 $ 98,569 $ 911,344 $ 2,701,737 Motor Fuel Tax 723,737 2,762 123,024 603,475 Community Development Block Grant Fund 4,287 5,000 8,395 892 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 277,390 8,688 197,926 88,152 Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 3,843,089 184,631 440,147 3,587,573 Parking System Revenue 146,269 4,428 4,098 146,599 Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund 1,230,502 17,433 127,612 1,120,323 Vehicle Replacement Fund 559,637 12 2,272 557,377 Capital Projects Capital Improvement Fund 248,495 3,313 8,121 243,687 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985 115,716 1,621 - 117,337 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1991 492,492 595 264 492,823 Police & Fire Building Construction 6,294,553 2,372 51,805 6,245,120 Flood Control Revenue Fund 2,753,232 221 480 2,752,973 Debt Service Fund 1,567,382 2,684 - 1,570,066 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund 6,344 3,599 6,540 3,403 Escrow Deposit Fund 1,325,846 46,775 17,092 1,355,529 Police Pension Fund 16,529,178 15,718 - 16,544,896 Firemen's Pension Fund 18,539,115 16,011 - 18,555,126 Benefit Trust Funds 244,940 202 2,167 242,975 $58.416,716 $414,634 51.901,287 556,930.063 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS ALTER DESIGN BUILDERS MARY SLEEKER JAMES BOSSEMEYER CITIBANK,N.A. CLEAN & PRESS CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT LYNDA DANNHAUER SHAWN DELANEY DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT DONNA DISILVESTRO VINCENT DIVITO, INC. KAREN ELDRUP EVER READY FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS. FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS ROGER GASMANN R. D. GRAHAM LAWRENCE HODGES WALTER HOFFMAN ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT S. JONIC ANDREA JUSZCZYK VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL C9023 ALTER DESIGN BLDRS $500.00 $500.00 C9155 BLEEKER $110.00 $110.00 C9370 BOSSEMEYER $75.00 $75.00 PMT INS CLAIMS GAB $11,794.35 55509-37902A PMT INS CLAIMS $22,484.32 $34,278.67* REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $.26 $•2f PMT P/R 10/03/91 $224.25 $224.2 C9633 DANNHAUER $100.00 $100.00 REFUND STICKER PURCHASE $40.00 $40.00 P/R ENDING 10/03/91 $390,550.25 P/R ENDING I0/03%91 $1,030.90 P/R ENDING 10/03f91 $728.58 P/R ENDING 10/03%91 $38,980.16 P/R ENDING 1003/91 $385.32 $431,675.21* C 175 DISILV STRRO $100.00 $100.00 ILL 83 WATER MAIN $18,495.80 $18,495.80 C7079 ELDRUP $21.00 $21.00 09826 EVER READY $100.00 $100.00 SAVINGS BONDS PfJR 10 03/91 $550.00 DUE TO FED DEP P/R 10/3 $2,297.36 DUE TO FED DEP P/R i0/3 $44.73 DUE TO FED DEP P/R 10/3 $63.18 DUE TO FED DEP P/R 10/3 $8,593.76 DUE TO FED DEP PR 10/3 $3,650.31 $15,199.34* SEPT 91 MED BENE IT R IMB $5,069.95 SEPT 91 DEP CARE REIMB $1,470.00 $6,539.9-* C9574 GASMANN $100.00 $100.( REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $4.76 �- REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $.48 $5.24 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $19.04 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $1.92 $20.96 C8584 HOFFMAN $75.00 $75.00 EMPLOYEE SHARE SEPT $17,391.39 EMPLOYER SHARE SEPT $42,280.21 $59,671.60* C8928 JONIC $70.00 $70.00 PMT P/R 10/03/91 $254.00 $254.00* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS GARY KLASEN REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $16.66 $1.68 $18.34 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $50.00 $50.00 ROBERT KOOZKER MATOCHA ASSOCIATES C9761 KOOIKER 01496 MATOCHA ASSOCIATES $300.00 $300.00 ARTHUR J. NEMES C9815 NEMES C8745 NICHOLAS ASSOCIATES $50.00 $475.00 $50.00 $475.0 - NICHOLAS & ASSOC RAY PAPAL C8531 PAPAI $500.00 $500. PECK/JONES CONSTRUCTION C9665 PECK/JONES CONST $500.00 $500.00 $1,000.00 M. PETITT C9850 PECK/JONES CONST 09386 PETITT $100.00 $55.00 $100.00 $55.00* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES C9769 ROGERS A J $100.00 $100.00 ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO. JOHN F. RYAN REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $16.66 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $1.68 $18.34 GUY SEMAR REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $90.50 $9.12 $99.62 DELORES STEIN REFUND FINAL WATER BILL C9704 STEIN D $100.00 $1,270.00 $100.00 THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT BOND MONEY $2,670.00 BOND MONEY BOND MONEY $1,250.00 * BOND MONEY $600.00 $5,790.00A PEGGY THOMPSON MOUNT PROSPECT C9481 THOMPSON TR TO POLICE PENSION FUND $100.00 $22,844.91 $100.00 $22,844.91 VILLAGE OF VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TR TO WATER & SEWER FUND $1,377.83 $10,811.03 TR TO WATER & SEWER FUND C4508 CUSTOM HOME $100.00 06668 KATHCON $100.00 C7382 KATHCON $159.20 $12,548.. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT C1496 REINSPECT MATOCHA $200.00 $79.00 C7079 REINSPECT ELDRUP C8584 REINSPECT HOFFMAN $25.00 C8745 REINSPECT NICHOLAS $25.00 08928 REINSPECT JONES $30.00 C9370 REINSPECT BOSSEMEYER $25.00 $384.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TR $$1,500.00 TO GENERAL FUND ******************************************************************************************************** PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS FLOWERS $217.50 $217.50 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY 75TH COMM MTG ROLLS 75.40 $$5.46* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $ PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL** $301.36 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10%10/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS TR TO GENERAL FUND $5,504.95 TR TO GENERAL FUND $118,849.40 TR TO RISK MGT FUND $23,150.00 TR TO RISK MGT FUND $450.00 TR TO RISK MGT FUND $143,600.00 TR TO ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $100.00 $318,933.3f- 318,933.3/VILLAGE VILLAGEOF MOUNT PROSPECT TR TO IMRF FUND $159.44 $8,997.41 TR TO IMRF FUND TR TO IMRF FUND $2,046.60 TR TO IMRF FUND $217.57 $11,421.02 CORNELIA WOLF REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $2.38 $.24 $2.62 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL RESIDENT R/E TR TAX REBATE $436.00 $436.00 KEITH E. YOUNGQUIST CLEARING ACCOUNTS ***TOTAL** $942,982.55 GENERAL FUND $565,086.22 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,311.65 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $197,925.79 WATER & SEWER FUND FUND $117,865.12 $34,278.67 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $2,882.75 RISK MANAGEMENT ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $17,092.40 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $6,539.95 ******************************************************************************************************** PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS FLOWERS $217.50 $217.50 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY 75TH COMM MTG ROLLS 75.40 $$5.46* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $ PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL** $301.36 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10110/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $301.36 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AICP BROWNING -FERRIS INDUSTRIES DAVID M. CLEMENTS COMPUTERLAND JOHN F. DIXON WILLIAM RAINEY HARPER COLLEGE DAILY HERALD HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL HUMAN RESOURCE CERT. INSTITUTE DAVID C. JEPSON NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. XEROX CORP. REGISTER CLEMENTS PORTABLE SERVICE ADVANCE EXPENSES TONERS ICMA CONF EXPENSES TUITION -FELL SUBSCRIPTION PHYSICAL CASTELLANOS HR CERT EXAM RUSSELL EXPENSES GFOA CONY SEMINAR RUSSELL DALEY DUMOVICH OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC EXPENSES EXPENSES USAGE 1048 COPIER 1048 COPIER USAGE $290.00 $96.00 $1,048.00 $190.00 $1,039.14 $72.00 $148.20 $71.00 $285.00 $205.64 $150.00 $150.13 $44.54 $58.25 $191.11 $86.27 $290.0P $96.0 $1,048.0u $190.00 $1,039.14 $72.00 $148.20 $71.00 $285.00* $205.64 $150.00 $150.13 $44.54* $58.25* $277.38 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $4,125.28 GENERAL FUND $4,125.28 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION AT&T BANKCARD ASSOCIATES LARRY CULTON 016 089 7465 001 OFFICE SUPPLIES COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG COMM ASST BD MTG $601.25 $138.71 $25.00 $25.00 $601.25 $138.71 $50.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10110191 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION CORTEZ DIXON COMM ASST COW MTG $25.00 $148.20 $25.00 $148.20 DAILY HERALD SUBSCRIPTION $50.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE SERVICE $1,491.20 $1,541.20 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE HANDBOOK $15.00 $25.00 $15.00 $25.0 MARISHA JASON JONES, WARE & GRENARD COMM ASST COW MTG CABLE REGULATION ADVICE $240.00 $240.0 $2.64$14.37 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $2.64 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $13.45 $27.82* RESPOND SYSTEMS FIRST AID SUPPLIES COMM ASST COW MTG $13.20 $25.00 $13.20 $25.00 TASCHO SAEMS COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $2,853.02 GENERAL FUND $2,853.02 ******************************************************************************************************** FINANCE DEPARTMENT ARMOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION DUE ARMOR COLLECTION $853.42 $500.00 $853.42 $500.00 COMPUTERLAND DELL MARKETING CORPORATION COMPUTER SOFTWARE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $2, 935.00 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $99.00 $3,034.Q THE DRAWING BOARD ENVELOPES & LABELS $200.33 $194.00 $200.3 I.B.M. CORPORATION MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER MTCE COMPUTER & PRINTER $52.00 $246.00 ILLINOIS GFOA REGISTER WIDMER SEPT91 TR TAX TRANSACTIONS $65.00 $410.00 $65.00 $410.00 PEDERSEN & HOUPT PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $4.48 $230.00 - $4.48* PITNEY BOWES INC. CREDIT & OVERPYMT POSTAGE BY PHONE $199.50 POSTAGE BY PHONE $199.50 $169.00 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE THE DRAWING BOARD INC. MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS MUNICIPAL CLERKS OF ILLINOIS NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC STERLING CODIFIERS, INC. TYVEK ENVELOPES EMP RECOGNITION PLAQUES DUES FIELDS%LOWE OFFICE SUPPLIES DELIVERIES DELIVERIES LEGAL NOTICE BINDERS & SUPPLEMENTS BINDERS &--SUPPLEMENTS_ $307.60 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $319.68 PAGE 6 $40.00 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $159.81 $159.81 $16.70 PAYMENT DATE 1010/91 $15.10 $31.80 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT $3,504.0t, PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $169.25 $20.60 $169.25 $20.60 SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE TIME INC. MAGAZINE COMPANY DELIVERIES SUBSCRIPTIONS $49.93 $247.50 $49.93 $247.50 CAROL WIDMER EXPENSES GFOA CONF USAGE 1048 COPIER $191.11 XEROX CORP. 1048 COPIER USAGE $86.27 1090 COPIER MONTHLY CHGS $2,164.82 $571.26 $3,013.46 MICE AGREEMENT 1048 COPIER ***TOTAL** $8,982.97 FINANCE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND $8,982.97 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE THE DRAWING BOARD INC. MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS MUNICIPAL CLERKS OF ILLINOIS NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. ON TIME MESSENGER SERVICE PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC STERLING CODIFIERS, INC. TYVEK ENVELOPES EMP RECOGNITION PLAQUES DUES FIELDS%LOWE OFFICE SUPPLIES DELIVERIES DELIVERIES LEGAL NOTICE BINDERS & SUPPLEMENTS BINDERS &--SUPPLEMENTS_ $307.60 $307.60 $319.68 $ $40.00 $40.00 $159.81 $159.81 $16.70 $15.10 $31.80 $94.95 $94.95 $1,929.00 $1,575.00 $3,504.0t, VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $4,457.84 GENERAL FUND $4,457.84 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL VENDOR RISK MANAGEMENT BROOKFIELD OCTOBER ADMIN FEES OCT EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM $3,561.48 $8,507.77 MED CLAIMS THRU 9 26/91 THRU 1/04/91 $52,368.46 $19,62$.81 $84,066.52* WILLIAM A CARO, M=D. MED CLAIMS SERVICES RENDERED CANNING $60.00 $500.00 $60.00* $500.04 CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS. RISK MGT SERVICES OCT 91 LIFE INSURANCE $2,110.91 $2578 .9, FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. OCTOBER SERVICE FEES $578.75 $1,16$.50 $578.75 $ $1,168.50 KNIGHT,HOPPE,FANNING&KNIGHT,LT SEPT LEGAL SERVICES SERVICES CANNING $115.00 $115.00* MEDICINE, LTD. NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SERVICES RENDERED CANNING $ 2,015.00 207.00 $124.05 $2,222.00* NORTHWEST ONC. & HEMATOLOGY SC SERVICES GLASGOW SERVICES RENDERED CANNING $123.00 $MORRIS $124.05* NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C. SERVICES RENDERED CANNING $15.00 $138.00 SERVICES SERVICES RENDERED $2,250.00 $2,250.00 THE VOSS GROUP ***TOTAL** $93,333.73 RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $93,333.73 ******************************************************************************************************** INSPECTION SERVICES AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC REGISTER WULBECKER APP FEE WULBECKER $5.00 $25.00 $2 $$25. . 525.00 AMERICAN SOCIETY CIVIL ENGRS SERVICES $260.00 ANDERSON PEST CONTROL SERVICES $55.00 SERVICES $55.00 $55.00 SERVICES $55.00 SERVICES $80.00 SERVICES $55.00 $615.00 SERVICES VENDOR INSPECTION SERVICES DAILY HERALD NATIONAL SEMINARS NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. SOIL & MATERIAL CONSULTANTS, I SOUTHERN ILL. UNIV. AT EDWARD. XEROX CORP. INSPECTION SERVICES GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SUBSCRIPTION .54 $8.29 $2.34 $148.20 $148.20 REGISTRATION FEE . .67 $444467 $69.00 $69.00 $138.00 SEMINAR VANDORNICK $6.90 $80.49 $80.49 OFFICE SUPPLIES $108.06 $4.47 $26.61 MISC EXPENSES $460.29 $$9.53 MISC EXPENSES r $85.. MISC EXPENSES $80.00 MATERIAL TESTING MATERIAL TESTING $1,300.00 $1,380.00 REGISTER HANNEMAN $55.00 $55.00 MICE AGREEMENT 2510 COPIER $158.19 MTCE AGREEMENT 1035 COPIER $200.43 $571.26 MTCE AGREEMENT 1048 COPIER $65.00 $494.88 DEVELOPER COPIER 1035 ***TOTAL** $3,637.07 $2,257.07 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $1,380.00 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS .54 $8.29 $2.34 PARTS PARTS . .67 $444467 PARTS $58.53 PARTS $6.90 PARTS $2.43 PARTS $108.06 PARTS PARTS $26.61 AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION SERVICE $460.29 $266.37 $460.29 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT AMOCO OIL COMPANY BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER FRIES AUTO INC. ANTHONY A. HALACHOULIS HEWLETT PACKARD COMPANY HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC. IL ASSOC OF POLICE PLANNERS ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10191 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION GASOLINE 5930574016 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS GAS EXPENSES SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS 1 YR DUES-DRAFFONE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE SERVICE INVOICE AMOUNT $212.71 $17.15 $113.50 $95.49 $24.00 $26.69 $22.77 $18.30 $22.00 $23.92 $24.09 $26.00 $25.13 $15.60 $20.50 $18.00 $21.05 $25.35 $24.49 $20.80 $14.95 $17.90 $20.15 $24.70 $22.40 $28.25 $24.00 $162.00 $4.82 $11.97 $20.00 $166.23 $300.00 $100.00 $23.61 $126.25 PAGE 9 TOTAL $212.71 $226.14 $487.04 $24.0- $162.0 $16.79 $20.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT SERVICE $24.61 $740.70 STEVEN R. JENKINS CO., INC. SUPPLIES $313.22 $99.80 $313.22 $99.80 KALE UNIFORMS, INC. UNIFORM SUPPLIES $18.00 $18.00 MICHAEL J. KRUCIITEN EXPENSES $55.37 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. PARTS $5.70 PARTS PARTS $48.56 PARTS $227.20 PARTS $171.21 PARTS $249.88 PARTS $142.66 PARTS $212.90 PARTS $49.30 $1,162.78 LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG PHOTO SUPPLIES $249.91 $199.77 $249.91 $199.77 LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. SPOTLIGHTS 7`47 LEE AUTO PARTS PARTS PARTS $30.39 PARTS $75.62 PARTS $16.31 PARTS $19.26 PARTS $45.83 PARTS $81.99 $277.07 DAVID T. NICHOLSON EXPENSES $16.00 $21.61 $18.00 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $28.00 MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $20.50 MISC EXPENSES $1.07 MISC EXPENSES $15.72 MISC EXPENSES $12.00 MISC EXPENSES $57.00 MISC EXPENSES $3.52 MISC EXPENSES $5.12 MISC EXPENSES $30.00 $194.54 POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS $60.66 $60.66 QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL PARTS $12.55 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/1091 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT PARTS $6.84 PARTS $23 .38 PARTS $5.28 $86.75 QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. MEMO PADS BUSINESS TOWING CARDS $66.55 $326.00 $392.55 ROBERTS COMPANY, INC. PUBLICATION MTCE OF PARTS CLEANER $23.79 $110.08 $23.7 $110. SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION EXPENSES $24.00 $24.0 CATHY J. SCHMIDT JEFFREY SCHMITZ EXPENSES $24.00 $283.14 $24.00 $283.14 SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATOR EVIDENCE TECH SUPPLIES $24.00 $24.00 JOHN R. WAGNER EXPENSES EXPENSES $18.00 $18.00 ALLEN WILCOX Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE REPAIR & PAINT P-2 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 POLICE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $7,196.10 GENERAL FUND $7,196.10 ******************************************************************************************************** FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $12.55 $67.68 $80.23 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. SUPPLIES HYDROTEST AIR CYLINDER $84.75 $53.75_ $84.` DON ANDERSON EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS $30.20 $83.95 CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS SUPPLIES SERVICE $183.24 $30.00 - $183.24 CHAMPION SALES CORP. CRDEIT SUPPLIES CREDIT MTCE SUPPLIES $45.00 - SUPPLIES $723.00 $648.00 CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE, SERVICE $216.00 $370.60 REPAIRS SERVICE $79.94 $666.54 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. COMMONWEALTH EDISON CREATIVE ARTS DIXIE USA INC. EDUCATION ALLIANCE EMERGE A STAR ENGEL CONSTRUCTION FIRE CHIEF GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY DAILY HERALD HIGHLAND ILLINOIS AUTO CENTRAL ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO ILLINOIS CHIEFS FOUNDATION ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS FOUND. KALE UNIFORMS, INC. KREST UNIFORMS, INC. LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC M & R RADIATOR INC. MAC TOOLS MACACADEMY MCMASTER-CARR MEDICAL PRODUCTS MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL BA77-JT-2404-A $9.03 $9.03 IMPRINTING FORMS $168.72 $168.72 SUPPLIES $217.71 SUPPLIES $35.98 $253.69 SERVICE COMPUTER $187.50 $187.50 FLASHER UNIT $88.35 $88.3` TANK MOVE $400.00 $400.( SUBSCRIPTION $83.00 $83.0u SUPPLIES $324.38 $324.38 PAINT SUPPLIES $79.45 PAINT SUPPLIES $124.90 PAINT SUPPLIES $55.05 PAINT SUPPLIES $48.57 $307.97 SUBSCRIPTION $148.20 $148.20 1 WASHING MACHINE $350.00 $350.00* HYDRO SEAT CYLINDER $25.25 $25.25 SERVICE $222.10 SERVICE $75.08 SERVICE $400.00 SERVICE $115.24 SERVICE $121.79 $934.21 REGISTER KLEIN $125.00 $125.00 REGISTER FLORY $125.00 $125.00 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $34.95 $34.95 UNIFORM SUPPLIES $230.00 $230.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $35.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $46.30 $81.' REPLACED RADIATOR $152.15 $152.1 WHEEL BEARING PACKER $36.70 $36.70 REGISTER DUMOVICH $259.00 $259.00* SUPPLIES $404.34 $404.34 SUPPLIES $292.34 SUPPLIES $259.07 SUPPLIES $81.13 SUPPLIES $88.13 $720.67 TONER $130.16 $130.16 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST REPAIR STARTER $35.00 $390.00 $35.00 $390.00 MQS INSPECTION, INC- AERIAL DEVICE $68.77 $68.77 NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSI PARTS PHYSICALS $2,500.00 $555.00 $3,055.00 PHYSICALS $21.52 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES $25.06 $46.5a ORDER FROM HORDER SUPPLIES FIRE TEST BANK SOFTWARE $176.68 $106.00 $176.68 $106.00 PERFORMANCE TRNG-SYSTEMS, INC. EXPENSES $10.85 PETTY CASH FIRE DEPT. EXPENSES $14.62 EXPENSES $16.00 EXPENSES $31.33 EXPENSES $9.08 EXPENSES $5.30 EXPENSES $4.36 EXPENSES $8.54 EXPENSES $21.39 EXPENSES $8.70 EXPENSES $3.62 EXPENSES $4.65 EXPENSES $11.22 $3.39 $153.05* EXPENSES OPTICOM EMITTER $2,900.00 $2,900.00 PINNER ELECTRIC QUALEX, INC. CREDIT PHOTO SUPPLIES $37.76- $54.36 PHOTO SUPPLIES $29.11 PHOTO PROCESSING $10.89 PHOTO PROCESSING $14.40 PHOTO SUPPLIES $11.74 PHOTO PROCESSING $18.90 PHOTO SUPPLIES PHOTO SUPPLIES $7.25 $108.89 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION MACH SVC $69.50 $755.00 $69.50 $755.00 R. SCHMITT GEAR BAGS 3 DOZEN DONUTS $26*16 SIANA BAKERY PASTRIES $119.76 $145.92 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY USAR SEMINAR VITAL RECORD BANC, INC. MICHAEL WAGNER & SONS, INC. FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10%10%91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SUPPLIES $25.70 $60.00 SUPPLIES $45.14 $70.84 REGISTER AMBER $125.00 $125.00 COPIES $21.00 $21.00 BLACK PIPE $115.29 $115.29 SEPT DRIVER REIMB ***TOTAL** $15,668.5 $14,693.70 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $975.10 ******************************************************************************************************** HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION JANET ABERNETHY RITA ADAMCZYK AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE,INC. AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC. WILL ASHLEY LEONARD W. BAZAN CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY CHICAGO HOSPITAL SUPPLY CORP CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP COMMUNITY CAB CO. JUDY FELL HAZEL FRICKE FYRNETICS INC. MICHELLE GATTAS DAILY HERALD ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ILLINOIS COMMUNITY EDUC. ASSN. LISA LEVIN STATE LICENSE FEE $60.00 $60.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $3.00 $3.00 SEPT AUDIO KIT $137.78 PARENTS HANDBOOK $189.42 $327.20 SENIOR TAXI RIDES $929.25 $929.25 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $15.00 $15.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $18.00 $18.00 HLTH FAIR DANISHES $86.94 $86.94 SUPPLIES HLTH FAIR DRS $31.64 $31.64 2 YR SUBSCRIPTION $50.76 $50.7 SENIOR TAXI RIDES $153.55 $153.5_ REIMB LUNCH HLTH FAIR $146.21 $146.21 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $6.00 $6.00 SMOKE DETECTORS $243.75 $243.75 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $3.00 $3.00 SUBSCRIPTION $148.20 $148.20 SERVICE $400.00 $400.00 ANNUAL MEMBERSHIP MORGAN $40.00 $40.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $9.00 $9.00 VENDOR HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION RAY LUNDIN LINDA MARKAY EARLE'MATTSON MAYO CLINIC HEALTH LETTER MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS NANCY MORGAN PARKE-DAVIS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT PRIDE INSTITUTE OTTO SCHERR JEANNE SHERMAN BERTHA STEIL KATHI WESLEY VIRGINIA ZITO HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10110191 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SEPT DRIVER REIMB $21.00 $21.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB SEPT DRIVER REIMB 12.00 $4.00 $$6.00 .00 2 YR SUBSCRIPTION $444.00 $589.14 $ $4$44.14 VOLUNTEER AWARDS STATE LICENSE FEE $ 60.00 $60.0 MEDICAL SUPPLIES $2,689.22 $298.80 - CREDIT MEDICAL SUPPLIES CREDIT MEDICAL SUPPLIES $23.90- $2,366.52 MISC EXPENSES $65.15 $36.00 $65.15* $36.00 SUBSCRIPTION $4.00 $9.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $9.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $12.00 $$9.00 .00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $15.00 $12.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB $ $15.00 SEPT DRIVER REIMB ***TOTAL** $5,928.31 $5,928.31 ******************************************************************************************************** PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT DAILY HERALD ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO MARVIN F. KOSOWSKI RFG.CO.INC. MICHAEL J. MORAN NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. REI TITLE SERVICES XEROX CORP. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT SUBSCRIPTION BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM CDBG 14 S OWEN SERVICES RENDERED OFFICE SUPPLIES CDBG-14 S OWEN USAGE 1048 COPIER 1048 COPIER USAGE $148.20 $2,555.56 $4,195.00 258.00 $22.89 $75.00 $148.2, $2,555.56 $4 $258.00 $22.89 $75.00 $191.11 $86.26 $277.37 ***TOTAL** $7,532.02 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10%10/91 PAGE 16 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $448.46 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $7,083.56 STREET DIVISION ABM, INC. XEROX 7024 FAX $997.50 $997. AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $18.64 PARTS $31.42 PARTS $63.84 PARTS $56.82 PARTS $44.76 PARTS $2.43 PARTS $56.76 PARTS $54.75 $329.92 AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC. PARTS $23.99 PARTS $14.04_ PARTS $43.27 CLEANING SUPPLIES $598.32 PARTS $14.12 $693.74 AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL JACKETS $117.50 $117.50 ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO. MAINITENANCE AGREEMENT $147.00 $147.00 ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY HIGH SECURITY KEYS $60.00 $60.00 ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION 1991 RESURFACING $20,159.54 EMULSION $93.75 1991 RESURFACING $39,794.99 1991 RESURFACING $91,369.61 $151,417. BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER SUPPLIES $17.15 SUPPLIES $17.15 SUPPLIES $113.50 SUPPLIES $113.50 SUPPLIES $88.90 SUPPLIES $95.50 $445.70 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. VEHICLE WASH AUG 91 $163.50 $163.50 CADE INDUSTRIES CLEANING SUPPLIES $134.50 CLEANING SUPPLIES $134.50 VENDOR STREET DIVISION JEAN CAPRA CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CHERRY'S TRUCK PARTS CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS COMMONWEALTH EDISON CONRAD AND SON COOK COUNTY TREASURER LEONARD CUTHIE DESIGN STORAGE SYSTEMS, INC. DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS, IN ENGINEMASTERS, INC. G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO GREAT LAKES AIRGAS HANDY ANDY HOME CENTER HARVEY CEMENT PRODUCTS, INC. HENRICKSEN THE CARE OF TREES HENRICKSEN ILLINOIS IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBOR IVERSON'S PERENNIAL GARDENS NELS J. JOHNSON LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES CLEANING SUPPLIES SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT CLEANING SUPPLIES FITTINGS MTCE SUPPLIES SERVICE JANITORIAL SERVICE 9/15-30 AUG 91 STREET LIGHTING TRAFFIC SIGNAL LIGHTING LANTERN BATTERIES MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT PW BLDG SHELVING PARTS FUEL FILTERS UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICE WELDING WIRE 1 COUNTERTOP WATERSTOPPER SEALER TREE & DEBRIS REMOVAL SERVICE CHARGE REPAIR FLAGS 2 TRENCH SHOVELS PUBLICATION TREE BUSH FLWR REPL PARKWAY TREE TRIMMING PARKWAY TREE TRIMMING PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS PARTS INVOICE AMOUNT $134.50 $181.37 $181.37 $181.36 $105.00 $707.11 $8.20 $308.23 $69.67 $1,796.00 $9,208.23 $6,316.03 $339.84 $1,372.58 $140.00 $1,712.70 $56.17 $32.60 $144.00 $144.00 $37.82 $96.00 $862.40 $850.00 $50.00 $14.00 $39.90 $94.00 $294.88 $8,822.00 $12,432.00 $24.28 $3.68 $42.41 $4.39 $44.36 PAGE 17 TOTAL $947.60 $105.00 $707.17 $8.2� $308.2, $69.67 $1,796.00 $15,524.26 $1,372.58 $140.00 $1,712.70 $56.17 $32.60 $288.00 $37.82 $96.00* $862.40 $850.00 $50.00 $53.-- $94.( $294.8b $21,254.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION PARTS $11.03 PARTS $4.70 PARTS $69.10 PARTS $24.28 $228.23 LEE AUTO PARTS PARTS $39.96 PARTS $63.02 PARTS $3.68 CREDIT PARTS $17.40- $89.20 THE MORTON ARBORETUM SHIPPING CHGS-BOOKLETS $10.00 $10.00 MOTOROLA, INC. PAGER REPAIRS $66.75 $66.75 NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR REPAIR COMPRESSOR $598.22 $598.22 NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER PARTS $4.64 $4.64 PACIFIC CO. OPTICOM CONF SIGNAL $950.00 $950.00 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. EXPENSES $8.00 $8.00* PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $15.00 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $10.00 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES 5.71 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $28.08 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $17.84 EXPENSES $6.91 EXPENSES $123.95 $202.49* PLANT CLINIC PLANT SAMPLE ANALYSIS $5.00 $5.00 K. R. PLATT SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT $140.00 $140.00 POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS PARTS $78.31 $481.34 $559.65 QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL PARTS $13.39 $10.87 PARTS $21.90 PARTS $90.24 PARTS $75.04 $211.44 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION MICE OF PARTS CLEANER $110.08 $110.08 SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY MICE SUPPLIES $188.44 PARTS $1,758.58 PARTS $164.95 $2,111.97 SHEPP PEST CONTROL OCT 91 SERVICE $40.00 OCT 91 SERVICE $40.00 VENDOR STREET DIVISION SHERWIN-WILLIAMS STATE TREASURER TRADE MARK GRAPHICS, INC. VERMEER-ILLINOIS VULCAN SIGN WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES HOWARD L. WHITE & ASSOCIATES, STREET DIVISION GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL OCT 91 SERVICE $40.00 $40.00 OCT 91 SERVICE $40.00 OCT 91 SERVICE OCT 91 SERVICE $40.00 $240.00 LINE LASER $3,000.00 LINE LASER $982.75 $767'15 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $33.55 $4,783.4- MTCE TRAFFIC CONTROL $89.99 $381.18 MICE TRAFFIC CONTROL SHAARE COST TRAFFIC CONTROL $529.11 MTCE TRAFFIC CONTROL $523.02 6.20 $1$523.00 DOOR EMBLEMS $242 29 MTCE SUPPLIES $307 28 MTCE SUPPLIES CREDIT MTCE SUPPLIES $1304.78- MTCE SUPPLIES $244 80 $377.03 $244 80 SIGN MAKING MATERIALS $130.00 $130.00 MTCE SUPPLIES $14.08 PARTS $62.36 $76.44 PARTS TRASH RECEPTICAL LINERS $193.50 $193.50 ***TOTAL** $214,713.86 $88,357.20 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $4,712.70 $121,643.96 ******************************************************************************************************** WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ABM, INC. AETNA TRUCK PARTS XEROX 7024 FAX PARTS $997.50 $997.50 $25.59 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY AUTOMATED TRAINING SYSTEMS B & H INDUSTRIES BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. CADE INDUSTRIES CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY COMMONWEALTH EDISON CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK CORNER STONE SERVICE, INC. CUES, INC. DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP THE FILE MART FREDRIKSEN & SONS G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO MARIO GAMBINO LANDSCAPING INC GREAT LAKES AIRGAS H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC. I.B.M. CORPORATION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10%10/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARTS $174.51 $200.10 JACKETS $117.50 $117.50 CYLINDER CHANGE $20.00 $20.00 TRAINING UPGRADES TRAINING UPGRADES $100.00 $100.00 $200.00 XEROX BOND COPIES XEROX BOND COPIES $13.20 $14.30 $27.`_ SUPPLIES 17.15 SUPPLIES $113.50 $95.49 $226.14 SUPPLIES VEHICLE WASH AUG 91 $34.00 $34.00 CLEANING SUPPLIES $391.00 $86.94 $391.00 $86.94 HLTH FAIR DANISHES BB72-JT-5608-D $76.14 $8.08 $84.22 BB72-JT-8548-A VILLAGE SHARE FIXED JAWA $106,572.00 OPER/MAINT COSTS JAWA $31,822.00 LAKE WATER PURCHASE JAWA $149,047.00 $13,745.00 $301,186.00 POWER COSTS JAWA STAKES $69.10 $69.10 REPAIRS $180.03 $180.03 ENG SERVICES RENDERED $3,750.00 $3,750.00 DELIVERY $140.00 DELIVERIES $89.75 $229.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES $155.25 $155.25 EXTINGUISHER SERVICE $20.00 $20.00 UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICE $144.00 $144.00 $288.. PARKWAY RESTORATION $1,570.00 $1,570.00 WELDING WIRE $37.81 $37.81 WATER METER LABOR $356.85 WATER METER LABOR WATER METER LABOR $570.97 $285.48 $1,213.30 PARTS $12.32 $12.32 MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER $194.00 MTCE AGREEMENT $115.37 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION MICE COMPUTER & PRINTER $52.00 $361.37 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $146.85 $203.83 SERVICE SERVICE $533.12 SERVICE $37.04 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $61.25 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $97.32 SERVICE $300.00 SERVICE $31.51 $1,502.81 J & L INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY CO. MACHINE VISE $175.00 $32.80 $207.80 2 DRILLS REIMB SAFETY SHOES $50.00 $50.00 WALT JENSEN LAND AND LAKES CO REFUSE DISPOSAL DISPOSAL 9/4-12 $1,320.00 $528.00 $1,848.00 REFUSE $33`76 LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC. PARTS PARTS 17.92 PARTS $10.99 $62.67 LEE AUTO PARTS AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION PARTS SERVICES RENDERED $9.81 $63.75 $352.96 $9.81 $63.75 MID -WEST METER COMPANY, INC. MICE SUPPLIES PAGER REPAIRS $ $66.75 MOTOROLA, INC. NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA $15.68 $16.80 1818 112 BONITA DR 117 N WAVERLY $16.42 $48.F NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $107.17 $33.07 $107.1 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $45.00 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $46.00 EXPENSES $53.20 EXPENSES $7.53 $184.80* POSTMASTER POSTAGE WATER BILLS $530.75 $53.64 $530.75* QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL PARTS $10.70 PARTS VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION RACK -STRAP INC. RAINBOW I HR PHOTO EXP. ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO. SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY SOUND INCORPORATED STANDARD INDUSTRIAL EQUIPMENT TANK INDUSTRIES CONSULTANTS TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI V & G PRINTERS INC. WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10110/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARTS $46.17 PARTS $11.01 PARTS $9.75 $131.27 SUPPLIES $199.00 $199.00 FILM PROCESSING $10.79 $10.79 MTCE SUPPLIES $111.00 $111.00 MTCE OF PARTS CLEANER $110.09 $110.( SUPPLIES LAB488575001 $40.08 SUPPLIES $420.00 $460.08 REPAIR VIDEO MONITOR $75.00 $75.00 AIR IMPACT WRENCH $85.00 $85.00 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $3,657.00 $3,657.00 SUPPLIES $17.85 SUPPLIES $26.07 SUPPLIES $5.31 $49.23 DOOR HANGERS $415.00 $415.00 PARTS $80.80 $80.80 PARTS $165.00 PARTS $238.77 $403.77 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ***TOTAL** $322,282.03 WATER & SEWER FUND $322,282.03 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C LAND LEASE $1,202.69 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 19 NORTHWEST HWY $12.26 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,202.69 $12.26 $1,214.95 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10/10191 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $1,214.95 ******************************************************************************************************** REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ARC DISFOSAL COMPANY SEPT 91 COLLECTIONS SEPT 91 COLLECTIONS $ 105,006.13 $45,346.22 SEPT 91 COLLECTIONS $24,150.95 SEPT 91 COLLECTIONS $27,626.23 $202,129.53 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $202,129.53 GENERAL FUND $202,129.53 ******************************************************************************************************** CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS BRAUN ENTERPRISES TENT DEPOSIT FOR 10/11/91 TENT INSTALLATION BALANCE $365.00 $853.00 $1,218.00* BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING PARTS $353.92 $353.91 PARTS PARTS $6.97 PARTS $6.96 $721.76 BUSSE HARDWARE SUPPLIES $31.24 31.87 SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $28.51 $91.62 COSBY AND BELL SEPT LEGAL SERVICES $264.00 $4.17 $264.00 COURTESY HOME CENTER SUPPLIES SUPPLIES 13.87 SUPPLIES $26.62 $44.66 CRYSTAL CATERING, INC. CATERING GROUNDBREAKING $474.00 $18,467.02 $474.00* $18,467.02 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. SERVICES RENDERED PAINTING 101 S MAPLE $2,052.00 $2,052.00 RANDY HAGGERMAKER VENDOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS HENRICKSEN ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM KAR PRODUCTS INC KINDER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. PHIL MARTIN THOMAS G. OAKSON POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY ZIEBART CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS FLOOD CONTROL CONSTR FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10110/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL OFFICE FURNITURE $382.00 $698.19 $382.00 $698.19 SERVICE SERVICE PHONE SYSTEM $100.00 SERVICE PHONE SYSTEM PHONE SYSTEM $200.00 $30,196.40 $30,496.40 EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT $122.32 $122.32 $244.E GRNDBRKG CEREMONY SHOVELS $314.88 $314.8 SQUAD CONVERSION P-5 $934.60 $934.60 FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE $130.40 $130.40 FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE $350.00 $350.00 PARTS $59.88 PARTS 60.15 $55.72 PARTS $175.75 RUSTPROOF 91 PICK-UP $195.00 $195.00 ***TOTAL** $57,254.92 $2,271.75 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $2,434.00 $51,804.77 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $264.00 $480.40 ******************************************************************************************************** DEBT SERVICE FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLOOD LOAN INT 361.15 FLOOD LOAN PRIN110/1191 $3$282.58 $3,643.73 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ***TOTAL** $3,643.73 GENERAL FUND $3,643.73 ******************************************************************************************************** VENDOR PENSION FUNDS FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS CHARLES W. NICK VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAUL H. WATKINS PENSION FUNDS GENERAL FUND ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 10%10191 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION WITHHOLDING TAXES OCTOBER 91 PENSION NOVEMBER MEDICAL INSURANCE OCTOBER DISABILITY BENEFIT $883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2 INVOICE AMOUNT $200.00 $883.22 $484.50 $1,482.33 ***TOTAL** PAGE 25 TOTAL $200.00 $883.22 $484.50 $1,482.33 $3,050.0- $2,166.83 $1,901,288.12 DATE RUN 10/10/91 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 26 TIME RUN 12.04.01 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID-APPBAR SUMMARY BY FUND 10/10/91 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $911,344.01 22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $123,023.96 23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $8,395.21 24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $197,925.79 31 BENEFIT TRUST 42 $2,166.83 41 WATER & SEWER FUND $440,147.15 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $4,097.70 48 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $2,271.75 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $127,612.40 51 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $8,121.80 53 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS $51,804.77 56 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 $264.00 58 FLOOD CONTROL CONSTR FUND $480.40 73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $6,539.95 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $17,092.40 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,901,288.12 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT September 1, 1991 - September 30, 1991 Fund Revenues Expenses Fund Balance for for Balance Aug 31 1991 September 1991 September 1991 Sept.30. 1991 General and Special Revenue Funds General Fund $ 1,002,598 $3,628,636 $1,442,683 $ 3,188,551 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 852,952 110,669 210,719 752,902 Community Development Block Grant 100,186 40,138 22,417 117,907 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund < 137,626> 302,091 66,223 98,242 Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 3,666,121 1,262,643 443,321 4,485,443 Parking System Revenue Fund 135,346 15,508 6,092 144,762 Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund 926,605 209,985 72,769 1,063,821 Vehicle Replacement Fund 574,069 3,090 8,621 568,538 Capital Projects Capital Improvement Fund < 59,616> 334,979 29,761 245,602 Corporate Purpose Const 1991 267,758 2,420 5,123 - 265,055 95,512 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985 92,980 6,593,348 2,532 < 763> 202,630 6,389,955 Police & Fire Building Construction Flood Control Const. Fund 2,763,729 23,043 33,539 2,753,233 Debt Service Funds 968,942 573,428 1,555 1,540,815 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund 16,398,708 256,008 8,156 16,646,560 Firemen's Pension Fund 18,370,908 254,425 4,935 18,620,398 Benefit Trust Funds 254 008 1.520 2,167 253.361 J52.881.016 $7.020.352 $2.560.711 557.230.657 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL GENERAL FUND TAX REVENUE 1-000-00-4001 TAXES -CORPORATE CURRENT 1,554,800 647,830 1,554,800- 1,554,800- 100- 1-000-00-4002 TAXES -CORPORATE PRIOR 1,799,500 749,790 1,671,263 1,484,954 128,237- 128,237- 7- 1-000-00-4004 TAXES -GARBAGE CURRENT 813,300 338,875 813,300- 813,300- 100- 1-000-00-4005 TAXES -GARBAGE PRIOR 941,250 392,185 874,200 776,746 67,050- 67,050- 7- 1-000-00-4010 TAXES -RD & SRDG CURRENT 12,000 5,000 12,000- 12,000- 100- 1-000-00-4011 TAXES -RD 9 BRDG PRIOR 12,000 5,000 22,976 15,739 10,976 10,976 91 1-000-00-4013 RETAILERS OCCUPATION TAX6,100,000 2,541,665 1,434,294 460,479 4,665,706- 4,665,706- 76- 1-000-00-4014 SALES TAX -SPECIAL PAYMNT 0 1-000-00-4015 FOREIGN FIRE INS TAX 27,500 11,455 27,500- 27,500- 100- 1-000-00-4016 AUTO RENTAL TAX 6,500 2,705 1,773 586 4,727- 4,727- 73- 1-000-00-4017 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 450,000 187,500 220,977 49,311 229,023- 229,023- 51- 1-000-00-4018 FOOD 8 BEVERAGE TAX 550,000 229,165 232,447 51,434 317,553- 317,553- 58- 1-000-00-4019 HOTEL/MOTEL TAX 35,000 14,580 3,964 2,258 31,036- 31,036- 89- 1-000-00-4020 ELECTRONICS GAME TAX 12,000 5,000 70 115- 11.930- 11,930- 99 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 2,313,850 5,130,750 4,461,964 2,841,392 7,851,886- 7,851,886- 339 - FEE REVENUE 1-000-00-4101 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 190,000 79,165 103,662 27,993 86,338- 86,338- 45- 1-000-00-4102 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 37,500 15,625 22,457 6,778 15,043- 15,043- 40- 1-000-00-4103 REINSPECTION FEES 10,000 4,165 3,280 6,720- 6,720- 67- 1-000-00-4104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 17,500 7,290 15,686 4,617 1,814- 1,814- 10- 1-000-00-4105 PLAN EXAMINATION FEES 37,500 15,625 22,951 4,825 14,549- 14,549- 39- 1-000-00-4106 STREET OPENING FEES 600 250 892 146 292 292 49 1-000-00-4107 VEHICLE LICENSE FEES 732,500 305,205 721,884 27,044 10,616- 10,616- 1- 1-000-00-4108 DOG LICENSES 12,000 5,000 10,614 127 1,386- 1,386- 12- 1 -000 -OD -4109 LIQUOR LICENSES 127,500 53,125 116,038 11,463- 11,462- 9- 1-000-00-4110 BUSINESS LICENSES 162,500 67,705 18,723 3,208 143,778- 143,777- 88- 1-000-00-4112 PUBLIC IMPR INSPECTIONS 32,500 13,540 29,034 6,512 3,466- 3,466- 11- 1-000-00-4113 RENTAL FEES 0 1-000-00-4114 FEES -BOARD OF APPEALS 17,500 7,290 4,050 1,050 8,450- 8,450- 48- 1-000-00-4115 CENTEL FRANCHISE FEES 25,500 10,625 12,605 12,895- 12,895- 51- 1-040-00-4116 BELL SYS FRANCHISE FEES 92,500 38,540 23,409 7,738 69,091- 69,091- 75- 1-000-00-4114 ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS 13,000 5,415 5,532 70 7,468- 7,468- 57- 1-000-00-4120 FALSE ALARM FEES 10,D00 4,165 1,460 480 8,040- 8,040- 80- 1-000-00-4121 CABLE TV FRANCHISE FEES 175,000 72,915 61,645 31,265 113,355- 113,355- 65- 1-000-00-4123 LANDLORD/TENANT FEES 37,500 15,625 37,748 518 248 248 1 TOTAL FEE REVENUE 1,731,100 721,270 1,217,170 122,421 513,932- 513,430- 30- INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1-000-00-4150 STATE INCOME TAX 1,725,000 718,750 819,281 332,447 905,719- 905,719- 53- 1-000-00-4151 STATE SALES TAX 102,500 42,705 34,186 14,487 63,314- 63,314- 62- 1-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX-SURCHG 0 1-000-00-4153 STATE USE TAX 152,500 63,540 186,017 169,128 33,517 33,517 22 1-000-00-4154 GRANT -SR. CITIZEN TAXI 0 1-000-00-4156 EMPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS 23,000 9,580 4,050 1,350 18,950- 18,950- 82- 1-000-00-4158 CHARITABLE GAMES TAX 2,000 830 1,261 1,261 739- 739- 37- 1-000-00-4160 RECYCLING GRANT 0 1-000-00-4161 GRANT - POLICE M E G 10,000 4065 10,000- 10,000- 100- 1-000-00-4162 GRANT -ILEO POLICE TRNG 22,500 9,375 11,174 11,174 11,326- 11,326- 50- 1-000-00-4163 GRANT -STATE FIRE TRAING 15,000 6,250 15,305 15,305 305 305 2 1-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 130,500 54,375 8,841 121,659- 121,659- 93- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL GENERAL FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1-ODO-00-4165 PERSONAL PROP R£PL R&B 3.500 1,455 1,418 2,082- 2,082- 59 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,186,500 911,025 1,086,533 545,652 1,099,967- 1,099,967- 50 - SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 1-000-00-4175 W & S SERVICE CHARGE 225,000 93,750 90,DDO 22.500 135,000- 135,000- 60- 1-000-00-4176 PARKING SERVICE CHARGE 15,000 6,250 6,000 1,500 9,000- 9,000- 60- 1-000-00-4177 MAINT. OF STATE HIGHWAYS 52,600 21,915 11,202 41,398- 41,398- 79- 1-000-00-4178 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPD 13,500 5,625 13,500- 13,500- 100- 1-000-00-4180 AMBULANCE TRNSPRT FEE 50,000 20,830 18,745 4,820 31,255- 31,255- 63- 1-000-00-4184 MULTIFAM REFUSE DISP CHG 30,962 30,962 30,962 0 1-000-00-4185 SALE OF REFUSE STICKERS 200,000 83,330 8,385 1,910 191,615- 191,615- 96- 1-000-00-4186 REFUSE DISPOSAL PENLTIES TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 556,100 231,700 165,294 30,730 390,806- 390,806- 70 - PARKING REVENUE 1-000-00-4216 FINES - LOCAL 195,000 81,250 51,948 11,095 143,052- 143,052- 73- 1 -OW -00-4217 FINES - CIRCUIT COURT 175,000 72,915 38,026 21,869 136,974- 136,974- 78- 1-000-00-4218 FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES 600 250 305 75 295- 295- 49- TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 37 0,600 154,415 90,279 33,039 280,321- 280,321- 76- OTHER REVENUE 1-000-00-4231 SALE OF CODE BOOKS 1,500 625 469 79 1,031- 1,031- 69- 1-000-00-4232 SALE OF REFUSE STICKERS 121- 0 1-000-00-4233 SALE OF REFUSE BAGS 125,000 52,080 110,731 5,408 14,270- 14,269- 11- 1-000-00-4234 SALE OF RECYCLING BINS 1,000 415 54 12 946- 946- 95- 1-000-00-4235 RECYCLING INCOME 45,000 18,750 16,424 3,019 28,576- 28,576- 64- 1-000-00-4243 SENIOR CENTER REVENUE 7,500 3,125 4,786 503 2,714- 2,714- 36- 1-ODO-00-4244 SPECIAL DETAIL REVENUE 12,000 5,000 3,473 675 8,527- 8,527- 71- 1-000-00-4245 REIMS-SERVICES&PROPERTY 25,000 10,415 10,831 2,029 14,169- 14,169- 57- 1-000-00-4246 REIMS - YOUTH COUNSELING 38,000 15,830 14,783 7,549 23,217- 23,217- 61- 1-000-00-4247 POLICE & FIRE REPORTS 13,000 5,415 3,796 572 9,204- 9,204- 71- 1-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 150,000 62,500 55,947 10,444 94,053- 94,053- 63- 1-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 17,500 7,290 11,762 1,326 5,738- 5,738- 33- 1-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 22,500 9,375 7,769 2,191 14,731- 14,731- 65- 1-000-00-4253 INTEREST -ESCROW FUND 80,000 33,330 34,283 7,125 45,717- 45,717- 57- 1-000-00-4255 FLOOD LOANS INTEREST 11,000 4,580 3,948 633 7,052- 7,052- 64- 1-000-00-4256 FLOOD LOANS PRINCIPAL 40,000 16,665 13,082 2,534 26,418- 26,918- 67- 1 -ODD -00-4260 FLOOD ENGINEERING REIMS 155,000 64,580 155,000- 155,000- 100- 1-DOO-00-4264 REIMB-CENTRAL ROAD 0 1-000-00-4267 WOLF ROAD REIMBURSEMENT D 1-000-00-4270 PROSPECT AVE PRKG REIMB 93,650 39,020 93,650 0 1-000-00-4275 SHARED COST -SIDEWALK 25,000 10,415 20,768 4,232- 4,232- 17- 1-000-00-4276 SHARED COST -TREE REPLC 60,000 25,000 13,050 6,300 46,950- 46,950- 78- 1-000-00-4277 FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM 40,000 16,665 13,975 5,125 26,025- 26,025- 65- 1-000-00-4299 GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT 56 1- 56 56 0 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 462,650 401,075 433,637 55,402 529,014- 529,013- 55 - TOTAL GENERAL FUND 8,120,800 7,550,235 7,454,877 3,628,636 10,665,926- 10,665,923- 131- MOTOR FUEL TAX. FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 22-000-00-4157 M F T ALLOCATION 1,150,000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 478,662 PAGE 3 671,338- 58- ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 35,000 14,580 1,453 1,453 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 96- 22-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 20,000 8,330 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D 1 % 300 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND 1,205,300 502,200 500,326 10,614 169 704,974- 704,974- TAX REVENUE 21-000-00-4012 HOME RULE SALES TAX 450,000 187,500 502,200 450,000- 450,000- 100- 21-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 1,400,000 583,330 2,880,983- 1,400,000- 1,400,000- 100- 21-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 50,000 M8 22.316- --29 ... - 50 - 100 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE i,90D,000 791,660 2.903=299- 1,900,000- 1,900,000- 100 - TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND ------------------------------------------ 1,900,000 791,660 2,903,299- 1,900,000- 1,900,000- 100 - MOTOR FUEL TAX. FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 22-000-00-4157 M F T ALLOCATION 1,150,000 479,165 478,662 105,181 671,338- 671,338- 58- 22-000-00-4242 REIMBURSEMT ON PROJECTS 35,000 14,580 1,453 1,453 33,547- 33,547- 96- 22-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 20,000 8,330 20,134 4,021 134 134 1 22-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 300 125 77 40,138 223- 223- 74- TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,205,300 502,200 500,326 10,614 169 704,974- 704,974- 58 - TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND -----`------------------------------------ 1,205,300 502,200 500,326 110,669 704,974- 704,974- 58 - COMMUNITY OEVLPNT._BLOCK GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 330,325 137,635 330,325- 330,325- 100- 23-000-00-4155 CDBG GRANT 305,130 127,135 243,996 32,000 61,134- 61,134- 20- 23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME 20,000 8=330 8'1 8 138 11,862- 11,862- 59 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 325,130 135,465 252,134 40,138 72.996- 72,996- 22 - TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT ------------------------------------------ 325,130 135,465 252,134 40,138 72,996- 72,996- 22 - ILL, MUNICIPAL.. RETIREMENT FUND TAX REVENUE 24-000-00-4055 TAXES - CURRENT 330,325 137,635 330,325- 330,325- 100- 24-000-00-4056 TAXES - PRIOR 365,450 152,270 339,396 301,561 26,054- 26,054- 7- 24-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 50,000 20.830 28,520 21.480- 21.480- 43 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 745,775 310,735 367,916 301,561 377,859- 377,859- 51- INTERFUND TRANSFERS 0 24-000-00-4228 TRANS - GENERAL/CABLE TV 24-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 2,500 1,040 832 534 1.668- 1.668- 67 - TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2,500 1,040 832 530 1,668- 1,668- 67 - TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 748,275 311,775 368,748 302,091 379,527- 379,527- 51- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -1-D Y -T -U CUR No BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL RENEFIT TRUST #2 OTHER REVENUE 31-ODO-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 20,000 8.330 7,924 1,506 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 20,000 8,330 7,924 1,506 TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #2 20,000 8,330 7,924 1,506 BENEFIT TRUST #3 OTHER REVENUE 32-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #3 ---------------------- L28NARY FUND TAX REVENUE 39-000-00-4031 TAXES - LIBRARY SERVICES1,729,935 720,805 39-000-00-4037 TAXES - IMRF 220,400 91,830 39-ODO-00-4038 TAXES - MAINT & REPAIR 144,200 60,080 39-C J -C 4 0 -INSURANCE 8 AUDIT 29 120 12,1`30 -0-A AX REVENJE 2,123,655 884,845 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 39-000-00-4157 STATE GRANT 53,170 22,150 39-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 25,330 10,550 39-000-00-4246 FINES AND FORFEITS 50,000 20,830 39-ODO-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 60,000 25,000 39-000-00-4254 OTHER INCOME 511,500 213,125 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 700,000 291,655 TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 2,823,655 1,176,500 ------------------------------------------ WATER & SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 41-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 41-000-00-4157 GRANT -SEWER REHAB 41-000-00-4201 WATER SALES 41-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES 72 14 72 14 72 14 641,450 267,270 856,600 356,915 813,451 733,291 15,000 6,250 7,706 1,513,050 630,435 821,157 733,291 3,685,000 1,535,415 1,833,208 436,341 370,000 154,165 187,208 47,481 60,000 25,000 22,502 5,840 UNREC'D BALANCE 12,076- 12,076- 12,076- 72 72 72 PAGE 4 x BALANCE BAL 12,076- 60- 12,076- 60- 12,076- 60- 72 0 72 0 72 0 1,729,935- 1,729,935- 100- 220,400- 220,400- 100- 144,200- 144,200- 100- 29.120-- - �-,,,29,120-- 1- 2,123,655- 2,123,655- 100- 53,170- 25,330- 50,000- 60,000- 511.500- 700,000- 2,823,655- 2,823,655- 641,450- 43,149- 7,294- 691,893- 641,450 -43,149-7,294- 691,893- 1,851,792- 182,792- 37 , 498- 1,851,792-182,792- 37,498- 53,170- 100- 25,330- 100- 50,000- 100- 60,000- 100- 511,500- 100- 700,000- 100- 00- 2,823,655- 2,823,655- 100- 641,450- 100- 43,149- 5- 7,294- 49- 691,893- 46- 0 1,851,792- 50- 182,792- 49- 37,498- 62- PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND FEE REVENUE 46-000-00-4113 RENTAL - DEPOT 2.880 1,200 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 240 PAGE 5 50 - TOTAL FEE REVENUE 2,880 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 240 1,440- 1,440- 50 - PARKING REVENUE ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 625 11500 0 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC'D 47,418- % 58- 46-000-00-4212 METER COLLECTION UNIT BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL WATER & SEWER FUND 3,540 4,040 1,200 4,460- 4,460- 52- 46-000-00-4214 PROSPECT AVE. INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 6,250 7,578 1,505 7,422- 7,422- 49- 46-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 41-000-00-4204 METER SALES 20,000 8,330 10,218 349 9,782- 9,782- 49- 41-000-00-4205 WATER & SEWER TAPS 50,000 20,830 55,416 58 - 5,416 5,416 11 41-000-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 30,000 12,500 7,392 53 22,608- 22,608- 75- 41-000-00-4244 FLOOD ENGINEERING REIMB 66,150 27,560 100- 66,150- 66,150- 100- 41-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 20,000 8,330 384 19,616- 19,616- 98- 41-000-00-4246 JAWA INCOME 0 41-000-00-4247 JAWA INTEREST 25,000 10,415 25,000- 25,000- 100- 41-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 250,000 104,165 111,779 38,309 138,221- 138,221- 55- 41-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS 22,000 9,165 514 424 21,486- 21,486- 98- 41-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 8,000 3,330 2,115 555 5,885- 5,885- 74- 41 -ODD -00-4280 SALE OF PROPERTY 20,000 8,330 20,000- 20,000- 100- 41-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 0 41-000-00-4299 WATER CLEARING ACCOUNT 0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,626,150 1,927,535 2,230,736 529,352 2,395,414- 2,395,414- 52 - TOTAL WATER & SEWER FUND 6,139,200 2,557,970 3,051,893 1,262,643 3,087,307- 3,087,307- 50 - PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND FEE REVENUE 46-000-00-4113 RENTAL - DEPOT 2.880 1,200 1,440 240 1.440- 1.44 - 50 - TOTAL FEE REVENUE 2,880 1,200 1,440 240 1,440- 1,440- 50 - PARKING REVENUE PLANNING & ZONING CHGS 1,500 625 11500 0 46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION UNIT #1 82,000 34,165 34,582 6,608 47,418- 47,418- 58- 46-000-00-4212 METER COLLECTION UNIT #2 66,000 27,500 26,567 5,255 39,433- 39,433- 60- 46-000-00-4213 SPACE RENT WILLE ST.LOT 8,500 3,540 4,040 1,200 4,460- 4,460- 52- 46-000-00-4214 PROSPECT AVE. 15,ODO 6,250 7,578 1,505 7,422- 7,422- 49- 46-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 10,000 4,165 4,003 700 5.997- 5.997- 60 TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 181,500 75,620 76,770 15,268 104,730- 104,730- 58 - TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND `---------------`----`-------------------- 184,380 76,820 78,210 15,508 106,170- 106,170- 58 - VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 48-000-00-4176 INSPECTION SERVICES CHGS 12,300 5,125 12,300 0 48-000-00-4177 HUMAN SERVICES CHARGES 1,600 665 1,600 0 48-000-00-4178 PLANNING & ZONING CHGS 1,500 625 11500 0 48 -000 -DO -4179 POLICE DEPT CHARGES 130,000 54,165 130,000 0 48-000-00-4180 FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES 135,000 56,250 135,000 0 48-000-00-4181 STREET DIVISION CHARGES 190,000 79,165 190,000 0 48-000-00-4182 WATER FUND CHARGES 102,500 42,705 102,500 0 48-000-00-4183 PARKING FUND CHARGES 9,000 3,750 9,000 0 48-000-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 20,000 8,330 13,407 3,090 6,593- 6,593- 33- 48-000-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT 3,000 1,250 3,000- 3,000- 100- 48-000-00-4263 SALE OF P.W. EQUIPMENT 10,000 4,165 10,000- 10,000- 100- RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4175 GENERAL FUND CHG-GENERAL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 202,400 PAGE 6 303,600- 60- ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 930,000 387,500 372,000 93,000 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 558,000- 60- 49-000-00-4177 WATER FUND CHG-GENERAL 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -1-D CUR MO UNNEC'D 82,650- % 60- BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND 56,250- 60- 49-000-00-4179 PARKING FUND CHG-GENERAL 4,500 1,875 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 450 2,700- 2,700- 60- 49-000-00-4180 LIBRARY FUND CHG-MEDICAL 48-DDO-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT 30,000 12,500 1,200 28,800- 28,800- 96- 48-000-00-4265 SALE OF ENGINEERNG EQPT EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 95,OD0 39,580 46,618 7,902 0 48-000-00-4289 GAIN/LOSS SALE OF ASSETS 51- 49-000-00-4242 RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS 145,000 60,415 D TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 644,900 268,695 596,507 3,090 48,393- 48,393- 8 - TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND ------------------------------------------ 644,900 268,695 596,507 3,090 48,393- 48,393- 8 - RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4175 GENERAL FUND CHG-GENERAL 506,000 210,830 202,400 50,600 303,600- 303,600- 60- 49-000-00-4176 GENERAL FUND CHG-MEDICAL 930,000 387,500 372,000 93,000 558,000- 558,000- 60- 49-000-00-4177 WATER FUND CHG-GENERAL 137,750 57,395 55,100 13,775 82,650- 82,650- 60- 49-000-00-4178 WATER FUND CHG-MEDICAL 93,750 39,060 37,500 9,375 56,250- 56,250- 60- 49-000-00-4179 PARKING FUND CHG-GENERAL 4,500 1,875 1,800 450 2,700- 2,700- 60- 49-000-00-4180 LIBRARY FUND CHG-MEDICAL 70,400 29,330 70,400- 70,400- 100- 49 -000 -OD -4241 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 95,OD0 39,580 46,618 7,902 48,382- 48,382- 51- 49-000-00-4242 RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS 145,000 60,415 59,365 11,460 85,635- 85,635- 59- 49-000-00-4243 LIBRARY CONTRIBUTIONS 32,000 13,330 45,772 16,327 13,772 13,772 43 49-D00-00-4244 FLEXCOMP CONTRIBUTIONS 9,000 3,750 2,864 581 6,136- 6,136- 68- 49-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 25,000 10,415 8,126 159 16,874- 16,874- 67- 49-000-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 70,000 29,165 30,181 6,125 39,819- 39,819- 57- 49-000-00-4249 INTEREST - GIE 5,500 2,290 5,500- 5,500- 100- 49-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 1,100 455 909 231 191- 191- 17- TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 2,125,000 885,390 862,635 209,985 1,262,365- 1,262,365- 54- TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 2,125,000 885,390 862,635 209,985 1,262,365- 1,262,365- 59 - CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TAX REVENUE 51-000-00-4016 TAXES - CURRENT 182,250 75,935 182,250- 182,250- 100- 51-000-00-4017 TAXES - PRIOR 221,500 92,240 205,693 182,762 15,807- 15,807- 7 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 403,750 168,225 205,693 182,762 198,057- 198,057- 49 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 51-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX-SURCHGE 99,263 99,263 99,263 99,263 0 51-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 10,000 4,165 5,291 399 4,709- 4,709- 47- 51-000-00-4249 MISCELLANOUS INCOME 1,555 1,555 1,555 1,555 0 51-000-00-4267 DEVELOPER DONATION 50,000 20,830 115,506 51,000 65,506 65,506 131 51-000-00-4268 HISTORICAL SOCIETY DONTN 30,000 12,500 14,052 15,948- 15,948- 53 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 90,000 37,495 235,667 152,217 145,667 145,667 162 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND ------------------------------------------ 493,750 205,720 441,360 334,979 52,390- 52,390- 11- POLICE & FIRE .BOND_. PROCEEDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 55-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 265,000- 265,000- ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 53-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 4,000,000 1,666,665 3,999,715 14- 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC'D 53-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME % 72,b99 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST 4,072,414 35,686 427,586- 427,586- 10 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,500,600 1,874,995 4,072,414 35,686 427,586- 427,586- 52-ODO-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX-SURCHGE 84 265,452 50,212- 265,452 265,452 0 52-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 15,154 68.999 13,763 68,999 68.994 0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 334,451 36,449- 334,451 334,451 0 TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BLDG CONST ------------------------------------------ 1,654 334,451 36,449- 334,451 334,451 0 POLICE & FIRE .BOND_. PROCEEDS INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 53-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX-SURCHG 265,000 110,415 55-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 265,000- 265,000- 100- 53-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 4,000,000 1,666,665 3,999,715 14- 285- 285- 0 53-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 235,000 97,915 72,b99 35,686 162,301- 162.301- 69 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,500,000 1,874,995 4,072,414 35,686 427,586- 427,586- 10 - TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS 4,500,600 1,874,995 4,072,414 35,686 427,586- 427,586- 10 - DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT_ CONST -1985 FEE REVENUE 56-000-00-4242 55-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 13,500 5,625 11,625 1,875 1,875- 1,875- 14- 55-000-00-4245 OTHER INCOME 9.940 2,420 15,011- 15,010- 60 - TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 0 55-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 495,246- 495,245- 3,445 657 3,445 3,445 0 55-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 495,245- 48 - 84 84 84 _Q TOTAL FEE REVENUE 13,500 5,625 15,154 2,532 1,654 1,654 12 TOTAL DOWNTOWN ------------------------------------------ REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 13,500 5,625 15,154 2,532 1,654 1,654 12 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT_ CONST._ 1991 OTHER REVENUE 56-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 1,000,000 416,665 519,765 480,235- 480,235- 48- 56-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 25.000 10,415 9.940 2,420 15,011- 15,010- 60 - TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 1,025,000 427,080 529,755 2,420 495,246- 495,245- 48 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN ------------------------------------------ REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 1,025,000 427,080 529,755 2,420 495,246- 495,245- 48 - FLOOD CONTROL CONSTR FUND TAX REVENUE 58-000-00-4012 NOME RULE SALES TAX 450,000 187,500 450,000- 450,OOD- 100- 58-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 1,400,000 583,330 2,880,983 2,880,983 1,480,983 1,480,983 106 58-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 50,000 20.830 45,359 45,359 4,641- 4,641- 9- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 65,500 1991-92 Y -T -U Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1,900,000 791,660 2,926,342 2,926,342 1,026,342 1,026,342 54 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL CONSTR FUND 1,900,000 791,660 2,926,342 2,926,342 ------------------------------------------ 1,026,342 1,026,342 54 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 TAX REVENUE 60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 65,500 27,290 65,500- 65,500- 100- 60-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 88,700 36,955 82,408 73,221 6,292- 6,292- 7- 60-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 5,400 2,250 5,400- 5,400- 100- 60-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 10,000 4,165 3,533 820 6,467- 6,467- 65 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 169,600 70,660 85,941 74,041 83,659- 83,659- 49 - TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 169,600 70,660 85,941 74,041 83,659- 83,659- 49 - CORPORATE PURPOSES B $ 1 1974 TAX REVENUE 61-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 61-000-00-4023 TAXES - PRIOR 61-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 61-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974 SSA #1 FROSF€CT MEA[X?WS B $ I TAX REVENUE 62-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 62-000-00-4026 TAXES - PRIOR 62-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I ----------------------------------- SSA #2 SLACKHAWK B & I TAX REVENUE 63-000-00-4028 TAXES - CURRENT 63-000-00-4029 TAXES - PRIOR 63-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA #2 BLACKHAWK B & I 92,200 38,415 140,750 58,645 130,737 116,162 8,000 3,330 17,000 7 080 5,769 1,323 257,950 107,470 136,506 117,485 257,950 107,470 136,506 117,485 9,900 4,125 9,800 4,080 8,799 8,626 2,500 1,040 1,110 219 22,200 9,245 9,909 8,845 22,200 9,245 9,909 8,845 11,000 4,580 8,950 3,725 7,816 7,798 3.000 1,250 1,201 235 22,950 9,555 9,017 8,033 22,950 9,555 9,017 8,033 92,200- 10,013- 8,000- 11,231- 121,444- 121,444- 9,900- 1,001- 1.390- 12,291- 12,291- 11,000- 1,134- 1,799- 13,933- 13,933- 92,200- 100- 10,013- 7- 8,000- 100- 11,231- 121,444- 00- 11 2 1-121,444- 47- 121,444- 47- 9,900- 100- 1,001- 10- 1,390- 56- 12,291- 55- 12,291- 55- 11,000- 100- 1,134- 13- 1,799- 60- 13,933- 61- 13,933- 61- DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11991 OTHER REVENUE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST 2,457 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 65-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 47 11 47 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 REVENUE 2,504 11 2,504 2,504 0 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D 1,000 X _-----_-`__--`---------------------------- BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL POLICE & FIRE BUILDING 8 & I 61 36,623- 36,623- 73 - TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B & I ------------------------------------------ 50,500 21,040 TAX REVENUE 64-000-00-4012 HOME RULE SALES TAX 200,000 83,330 36,623- 73- 200,000- 200,000- 100- 64-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST 18,904 18,904 18,904 0 64-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,500 625 525 249 975- 975- 65 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 201,500 83,955 19,429 249 182,071- 182,071- 90 - TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BUILDING B & I ------------------------------------------ 201,500 83,955 19,429 249 182,071- 182,071- 90 - DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11991 OTHER REVENUE 65-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST 2,457 2,457 2,457 0 65-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 47 11 47 47 0 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 2,504 11 2,504 2,504 0 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1991 2,504 11 2,504 2,504 0 INSURANCE RESERVE._8 8 I TAX REVENUE 66-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 67-000-00-4227 TRANS - FLOOD CONTROL 50,500 21,040 0 66-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 50,500- 50,500- 100- 67-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST 0 66-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,000 415 1,158 158 158 16 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1,000 415 1,158 158 158 16 TOTAL INSURANCE RESERVE B & I ----------------------------`------------- 1,000 415 1,158 158 158 16 FLOOD CONTROL 8.&_I INTERFUND TRANSFERS 67-000-00-4227 TRANS - FLOOD CONTROL 50,500 21,040 50,500- 50,500- 100- 67-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST 13,617 13,617 13,617 0 67-ODO-DO-4248 INTEREST INCOME 260 61 260 260 0 TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 50,500 21,040 13,877 61 36,623- 36,623- 73 - TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL B & I ------------------------------------------ 50,500 21,040 13,877 61 36,623- 36,623- 73- DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1987D TAX REVENUE 68-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 115,000 47,915 264,798 176,695 149,798 149,798 130 P W FACILITY B & I 14878 TAX REVENUE TAXES - CURRENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 31,250 PAGE 10 70-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 119,500 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 67,725 100- 70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 162,550- ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 69-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 204,000 87,080 144,114 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D 25,000 X 9,244 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11987D 174,528 193,192- 193,192- 49 - TOTAL P W FACILITY B & 119876 ------------------------------------------ 396,550 165,220 TAX REVENUE 174,528 193,192- 193,192- 49 - 2,080 828 615 68-0DO-00-4039 SALES TAX INCREMENT 4,172- 83- 71-000-00-4255 MARKET GAINS - EQUITIES TOTAL TAX REVENUE 115,000 47,915 264,798 176,695 144,798 144,796 130 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 33,289- 173,100- 173,100- 60- 71-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT 68-000-00-4224 TRANS - D/T CONST 1985 63,016 151,606 151.606 0 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 0 68-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 5,000 2.080 2,058 770 2,942- Z,942- 59- TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 5,000 2,080 2,058 770 2,942- 2,942- 59 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D 120,000 49,995 266,856 177,465 146,856 146,856 122 P W FACILITY B & I 14878 TAX REVENUE TAXES - CURRENT 75,000 31,250 70-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 119,500 69-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 162,550 67,725 100- 70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 162,550- 162,550- 100- 69-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 204,000 87,080 144,114 172,475 14,886- 14,886- 7- 69-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 25,000 10,415 9,244 2,053 15,756- 15,756- 63 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 396,550 165,220 203,358 174,528 193,192- 193,192- 49 - TOTAL P W FACILITY B & 119876 ------------------------------------------ 396,550 165,220 203,358 174,528 193,192- 193,192- 49 - DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT__B & I 1987C TAX REVENUE TAXES - CURRENT 75,000 31,250 70-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 119,500 49,790 114,500- 119,500- 100- 70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 145 60 2 143- 143- 99- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 119,645 49,850 2 114,643- 119,643- 100 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & I 1987C ------------------------------------------ 119,645 49,850 2 119,643- 119,643- 100 - POLICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 71-000-00-4049 TAXES - CURRENT 75,000 31,250 75,000- 75,000- 100- 71-000-00-4050 TAXES - PRIOR 1,500 625 25,711 22,845 24,211 24,211 614 71-000-00-4243 POLICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS 255,000 106,250 107,901 19,673 147,099- 147,099- 58- 71 -000 -DO -4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,400,000 583,330 660,270 163,148 739,730- 739,730- 53- 71-000-00-4249 OTHER 0 71-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 5,000 2,080 828 615 4,172- 4,172- 83- 71-000-00-4255 MARKET GAINS - EQUITIES 0 71-000-00-4275 OVERFUNDING CREDIT 288,500 120,205 115,400 33,289- 173,100- 173,100- 60- 71-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT 151,606 63,016 151,606 151.606 0 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 2,025,000 843,740 1,061,716 256,008 963,284- 463,284- 48 - TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND 2,025,000 843,740 1,061,716 256,008 963,284- 963,284- 48- SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B & I TAX REVENUE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 94-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 15,300 6,375 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 15,300- 15,300- 100- 94-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 16,900 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 12,603 2,740- 2,740- 16- 94-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D 1,024- % ------------------------------------------ 33,700 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL FI PENSION FUNS 14,040 14,636 12,710 19,064- 19,064- 57- TOTAL ALL FUNDS TAX REVENUE 24,423,946 62- 19,915,040 72-000-00-4052 TAXES - CURRENT 25,000 10,415 23,372,939- 25,000- 25,000- 100- 72-000-00-4053 TAXES -PRIOR 500 205 500- 500- 100- 72-000-00-4243 FIREMEN'S CONTRIBUTIONS 242,000 100,830 102,454 18,867 139,546- 139,546- 58- 72-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,575,000 656,250 732,597 182,653 842,403- 842,403- 53- 72-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME 0 72-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 5,OOD 2,080 1,207 890 3,793- 3,793- 76- 72-000-00-4255 MARKET GAINS - EQUITIES O 72-000-00-4275 OVERFUNDING CREDIT 359,900 149,955 143,960 41,527- 215,940- 215,940- 60- 72-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT 126,002 93,542 126,002 126,002 0 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 2,207,400 919,735 1,106,220 254,425 1,101,180- 1,101,180- 50 - TOTAL FIREMEN'S ------------------------------------------ PENSION FUND 2,207,400 919,735 1,106,220 254,425 1,101,180- 1,101,180- 50- SSA #4 BUSSE-WALE B & I OTHER REVENUE 89-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 15 15 15 0 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 15 15 15 0 TOTAL SSA #4 BUSSE-WILLE B & I ----------------------------`----_-------- 15 15 15 0 SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B & I TAX REVENUE 94-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 15,300 6,375 15,300- 15,300- 100- 94-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 16,900 7,040 14,160 12,603 2,740- 2,740- 16- 94-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,500 625 476 107 1,024 1,024- 68- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 33,700 14,040 14,636 12,710 19,064- 19,064- 57 - TOTAL SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B & I ------------------------------------------ 33,700 14,040 14,636 12,710 19,064- 19,064- 57- TOTAL ALL FUNDS 37,796,885 24,423,946 62- 19,915,040 7,020,352 23,372,943- 23,372,939- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9%30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 20,450 8,515 8,851 1,767 11,600 11,599 57 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 44,200 18,410 31,516 992 12,684 5 12,679 29 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,500 2,290 3,795 362 1,705 2 1,703 31 TOTAL MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 70,150 29,215 44,162 3,121 25,989 7 25,981 37 ADVISORY BOARDS AND C{#1MISS;O#S TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,250 935 99 2,151 2,151 96 TOTAL COMMODITIES 75D 310 4 746 746 99 TOTAL ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSI 3,000 1,245 103 2,897 2.897 97 TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 73,150 30,460 44,265 3,121 28,886 7 28,878 39 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 197,955 82,460 83,617 16.042 114.339 114,338 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,970 8,315 7,001 1,570 12,969 12,969 65 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,900 790 402 22 1,498 1,498 79 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 500 205 500 50 100 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 220,325 91,770 91,020 17,634 129,306 129,305 59 LEGAL SERVICES 142,500 59,370 64,757 22,497 77,743 77.743 55 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES 142,501) 59,370 64,757 22,497 77,743 77,743 55 PERSO#NEL MANAGEME#T & TRAI#I#G 46,240 19,260 19,775 3,607 26,465 26,465 57 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 36,350 15,125 15,419 2,503 20,931 5 20,926 58 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1.500 620 1,500 1.5 100 TOTAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT & TRAIN 84,090 35,005 35,194 6,110 48,896 5 48,891 58 TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ------------------------------------------ 446,915 186,145 190,971 46,241 255,945 5 255,939 57 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION CABtE TY OPERATIONS 113,875 47,430 42,132 7,784 71,743 71,743 63 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29,270 12,180 12,529 1,040 16,741 1 16,740 57 TOTAL COMMODITIES 13,000 5,415 1,604 40 11,396 11,396 88 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES66.2DD 6 745 700 15500 15.5 96 TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS 172,345 71,770 56,965 8,864 115,380 1 115,379 67 VILLAGE TELEPHONE SYSTEM TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40,250 16,765 14,758 3,084 25,492 25,492 63 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.500 625 1,500 1,500 100 TOTAL VILLAGE TELEPHONE SYSTEM 41,750 17,390 14,758 3,084 26,992 26,992 65 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 214,095 89,160 71,723 11,948 142,372 1 142,371 66 FINANCE DEPARTMENT AOMINISTRATIQN AHD SUPPORT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE RAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 152,250 63,415 63,764 13,985 88,486 88,486 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 75,480 31,435 23,516 6,088 51,964 1 51,963 69 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,250 2,600 1,519 132 4,731 4,731 76 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.500 1.040 2.500 2.5 100 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 236,480 98,490 88,799 20,205 147,681 1 147,680 62 ACCOUNTING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 87,285 36,365 37,660 6,871 49,625 49,625 57 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,900 1,625 1,396 3- 2,504 2,504 64 TOTAL COMMODITIES 750 310 157 593 593 79 TOTAL ACCOUNTING 91,935 38,300 39,213 6,868 52,722 52,722 57 PURCHASING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 23,100 9,625 9,733 1,777 13,367 13,367 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600 250 90 510 510 85 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1<9<ID 790 107 30 1.793 1 1.792 44 TOTAL PURCHASING 25,60} 10,665 9,930 1,807 15,670 1 15,669 61 DATA PROCESSING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 80,205 33,415 31,312 6,229 48,893 48,893 61 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,500 8,125 8,191 574 11,309 11,309 58 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,000 2,500 337 93 5,663 5,663 94 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,500 1,455 3,500 34 3,466 99 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE U TOTAL DATA PROCESSING 109,205 45,495 39,840 6,896 69,365 34 69,331 63 DUPLICATING SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,500 11,455 10,117 21002 17,383 17,383 63 TOTAL COMMODITIES 7.500 3.125 1.585 67 5.915 5,915 79 TOTAL DUPLICATING SERVICES 35,0D0 14,580 11,702 2,069 23,298 23,298 67 TELEPHONE SERVICE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE 0 INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 31,765 13,230 13,412 2,448 18,353 18,353 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 209.100 87.124 83.640 20,910 125,460 125.460 90 TOTAL INSURANCE 240,865 100,350 97,052 23,358 143,813 143,813 60 CUSTOMER SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 116,410 48,495 51,459 8,910 64,951 64,951 56 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,000 15,410 7,548 3- 29,452 29,452 80 TOTAL COMMODITIES 7.600 3.155 683 200 6,917 31 6.886 91 TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICES 161,010 67,060 59,690 9,107 101,320 31 101,289 63 CASH MANAGEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 24.805 10.330 10,458 1,904 14,347 14.34758 TOTAL CASH MANAGEMENT 24,805 10,330 10,458 1,909 14,347 14,347 58 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT 14 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPFNDITURFS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500 205 500 500 100 TOTAL NON --DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE 500 205 500 500 100 TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------ 925,400 385,475 356,684 72,219 568,716 67 568,649 61 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT_ TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 75,020 31,250 32,108 6,312 42,912 42,912 57 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,950 14,130 10,804 1,724 23,146 23,146 68 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,000 2.080 1.637 167 3,363 3.363 67 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 113,970 47,460 44,549 8,203 69,421 69,421 61 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,500 13,955 17,039 2,814 16,461 16,461 49 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3 000 1,250 1,729 1,271 1.271 42 TOTAL VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 36,500 15,205 18,768 2,814 17,732 17,732 49 TOTAL VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ------------------------------------------ 150,470 62,665 63,317 11,017 87,153 87,153 58 RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2.125.000 885.400 881,849 72,769 1.243,151 63 1,243 088 58 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 2,125,000 885,400 881,849 72,769 1,243,151 63 1,243,088 58 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT ------------------------------------------ 2,125,ODO 885,400 881,849 72,769 1,243,151 63 1,243,088 58 INSPECTION SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 449,400 187,215 184,392 33,100 265,008 265,008 59 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 95,400 39,725 38,064 7,408 57,337 4 57,332 60 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9,000 3,730 1,962 325 7,038 7,038 78 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 12.500 5.205 12.500 12,500 100 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 566,300 235,875 224,418 40,833 341,883 4 341,878 60 ENGINEERING SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 360,750 150,280 153,506 30,333 207,246 207,244 57 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79,150 32,950 23,887 3,851 55,264 160 55,103 70 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,500 2,705 1,114 291 5,386 5,386 83 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5.040 2.080 86 4.914 4,914 98 TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 451,400 188,015 178,593 34,475 272,810 160 272,647 60 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES ------------------------------------------ 1,017,700 423,890 403,011 75,308 614,693 164 614,525 60 POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPQRT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 919,710 383,160 371,659 29,327 548,052 548,051 60 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 243,800 101,565 89,776 19,710 154,025 154,024 63 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10,500 4,375 1,996 435 8,504 8,504 81 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 6,000 2,495 225 5,775 5.775 96 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,180,010 491,595 463,656 49,472 716,356 716,354 61 PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,707,375 1,128,050 1,138,346 209,047 1,569,029 1,569,029 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 319,70D 133,200 169,085 24,938 150,615 150,615 47 TOTAL COMMODITIES 30,200 12,570 5.114 2,29$ 25.087 25,086 83 TOTAL PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEME3,057,275 1,273,820 1,312,545 236,283 1,744,731 1,744,730 57 CRIME PR V. PUBLIC AND YOUTH SERV. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 121,815 50,740 49,622 8,749 72,193 72,193 59 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,100 6,700 4,714 850 11,387 11,386 71 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3,750 1,555 504 3,246 3,246 87 TOTAL CRIME PREV., PUBLIC AND YOUT 141,665 58,995 54,840 9,599 86,826 86,825 61 INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PROGRAM TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 565,960 235,785 236,732 43,434 329,228 329,228 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 51,200 21,330 19,164 4,600 32,036 32,036 63 TOTAL COMMODITIES 2,500 1.035 794 302 1.706 1 706 68 TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE P 619,660 258,150 256,690 48,336 362,970 362,970 59 CROSSING GUARDS 48,000 20,000 11,812 2,711 36,188 36,188 75 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 250 100 41 209 209 84 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS 48,250 20,10} 11,853 2,711 36,397 36,397 75 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 54,450 22,885 21,807 3,764 33,143 33,143 60 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 198,650 82,755 156,619 2,549 42,031 3 42,028 21 TOTAL COMMODITIES 124,DOO 51,660 51,323 10,994 72,677 20 72,657 59 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 51.200 21,325 39,253 11,947 11,947 23 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPER 428,800 178,625 269,002 17,307 159,798 23 159,775 37 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT --`--------------------------------`------ 5,475,660 2,281,285 2,368,586 363,708 3,107,078 23 3,107,051 57 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT, ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 719,495 299,760 274,584 17,539- 444,911 444,911 62 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 178,905 74,525 63,182 15,915 115,723 2 115,721 65 TOTAL COMMODITIES 34,400 14,330 7,115 4,700 27,285 152 27,133 79 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4 4- 0 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 932,800 368.615 344,881 3,076 587,919 158 587,761 63 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,910,055 1,212,490 1,238,903 235,621 1,671,153 1,671,152 57 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 265,490 110,610 104,282 26,081 161,208 1 161,207 61 TOTAL COMMODITIES 13,000 5,410 7,226 431 5,774 6 5,768 44 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 74.290 30,945 17,478 4,253 56,812 192 56.620 76 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 3,262,835 1,359,455 1,367,889 266,386 1,894,947 199 1,894,747 58 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT, FIRE TRAINING AGA@EMY TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 20,000 8,330 6,188 4,250 13,812 13,812 69 TOTAL COMMODITIES 7,290 3,035 2,354 37 4,936 4,936 68 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,200 915 2,200 2,200 100 TOTAL FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY 29,490 12,280 8,542 4,287 20,948 20,948 71 FIRE PREVENTION TOTALPERSONAL SERVICES 238,180 99,215 91,123 15,125 147,058 147,057 62 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,805 15,740 15,137 3,778 22,669 22,668 60 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,540 2,295 1,976 451 3,564 1 3,563 64 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 650 270 419 231 231 36 TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION 282,175 117,520 108,655 19,354 173,522 1 173,519 61 COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40,585 16,905 15,840 2,796 24,745 17 24,728 61 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 11,875 4,945 11,875 47 11,828 100 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 52,460 21,850 15,840 2,796 36,620 64 36,556 70 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 66,035 27,510 27,365 4,996 38,670 38,670 59 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 158,000 65,830 143,570 2,221 14,430 14,430 9 TOTAL COMMODITIES 45,400 18,910 15,985 2,193 29,415 29,415 65 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5,170 2,150 2,422 1,359 2,748 2,748 53 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPER 274,605 114,400 189,342 10,769 85,263 85,263 31 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,000 1,250 1,269 231 1,731 1,731 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,905 2,450 242 36 5,663 5,663 96 TOTAL COMMODITIES 2,605 1,075 349 150 2,256 2,256 87 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 6.840 2,840 1.937 479 4.903 32 4,871 71 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 18,350 7,615 3,797 8% 14,553 32 14,521 79 TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 4,852,715 ------------------------------------------ 2,021,735 2,038,946 307,564 2,813,772 454 2,813,315 58 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE POLICE & FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 328,925 137,050 164,460 27,410 164,465 164,465 50 TOTAL COMMODITIES_ 619 90 619- 619- U TOTAL POLICE & FIRE DISPATCH SERVI 328,925 137,050 165,079 27,500 163,846 163,546 50 TOTAL CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ------------------------------------------ 328,925 137,050 165,079 27,500 163,846 163,846 50 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION INFORMATION. REFERRAL & COUNSELING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 155,995 64,965 65,575 14,215 90,420 90,420 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 35,370 14,725 15,355 2,883 20,015 20,015 57 TOTAL COMMODITIES 4,050 1,680 318 3 3,732 3,732 92 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,600 665 4,674 584 3,079- 3 3,082- 193 - TOTAL INFORMATION, REFERRAL, & COU 197,015 82,035 85,927 17,685 111,088 3 111,085 56 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO ` BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 8,919 57 1,057 RECREATION AND EDUCATION 1,055 39 9,976 2 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 15,540 6,465 6,621 1,209 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,690 1,115 1,633 12,473 TOTAL RECREATION AND EDUCATION 18,230 7,580 8,254 1,209 HOME80UND SERVICES 30,380 74 I.384 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 53,940 22,470 23,220 4,278 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,150 7,560 5,677 971 TOTAL HOMEBOUND SERVICES 72,090 30,030 28,897 5,249 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES _ 1 2,812 66 9,575 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 41,040 17,090 10,660 2,240 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,$00 745 416 26 TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES 42,840 17,835 11,076 2,266 BLOW DONOR PROGRAM 28,358 73 2,653 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,805 1,165 1,168 234 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,45D 600 274 35 TOTAL BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 4,255 1,765 1,442 269 SOCIAL AGENCIES 17,115 84 14,184 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16,500 6,875 6,925 4,675 TOTAL SOCIAL AGENCIES 16,500 6,875 6,925 4,675 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ------`---------------------------------- 350,930 146,120 142,521 31,353 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 26,288 62 6,445 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNFNG 6,426 82 600 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 167,295 69,690 77,793 19,381 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 38,800 16,155 10,442 2,318 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3,250 1,345 597 136 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 200 80 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 209,545 87,270 88,832 21,835 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 49,950 20,800 22,284 3,720 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,350 8,475 3,235 429 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20 ODO 8,330 5,816 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 90,300 37,605 31,335 4,149 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 13,440 5,595 7,343 1,238 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT 13,440 5,595 7,343 1,238 CDBG ADMINISTRATIQN TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 42,380 17,640 16,092 2,198 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,850 3,255 1,405 217 TOTAL COMMODITIES 600 245 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 300 125 TOTAL CDBG ADMINISTRATION 51,130 21,265 17,497 2,415 PAGE 17 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 8,919 8,919 57 1,057 2 1,055 39 9,976 2 9,974 55 30,720 30,720 57 12,473 12,473 69 43,193 43,193 60 30,380 30,380 74 I.384 1,384 77 31,764 31,764 74 1,637 1,637 58 1,176 1 .1,175 81 2,813 1 2,812 66 9,575 101 9,474 57 9,575 101 9,474 57 208,409 107 2DB,302 59 89,502 89,502 53 28,360 28,358 73 2,653 2,653 82 200 200 100 120,715 120,713 58 27,666 27,666 55 17,115 17,115 84 14,184 14,184 71 58,965 58,965 65 6,097 6,097 45 6,097 6,097 45 26,288 26,288 62 6,445 19 6,426 82 600 600 100 300 300 100 33,633 19 33,614 66 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PAGE 18 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT CDBG C2nUNTTY PROGRAMS 34,000 16,245 7,889 3,889 31,111 311 30,800 79 TOTALCONTBACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 39,000 16,245 7,884 3,889 31,111 311 30,800 79 CUBS ACCESSIBILITY & NEIGHBORHOOD iMPRVM TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 60.000 25.000 53,458 6,042 28 6.014 10 TOTAL CDBG ACCESSIBILITY & NEIGHBO 60,000 25,000 53,958 6,042 28 6,014 10 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION 5,100 2,125 962 346 4,138 4,138 81 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 0.00 53-,763 15,767 66,237 66,237 55 _j?Qm 101AL CDBG RESIDENTIAL REIIABILITAT 125,100 $2,125 54,725 16,113 70,375 70,375 56 CSG COMMERCIAL REHABILITkTION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 7,900 3,290 132 7,768 7,768 48 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,000 1,665 4,000 4,000 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 18.000 7.500 18.000 18.000 100 TOTAL CDBG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATI 29,900 12,455 132 24,768 29,768 100 COBG MULTI -FAM i1.Y REHABILITATION 24- 24- 0 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 10,000 4,165 24 10,000 10.000 100 TOTAL CDBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITA 10,000 4,165 24 9,976 9,976 100 CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 0 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.000 4.165 10.000 10.000 100 TOTAL CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 10,000 4,165 10,400 10.000 100 TOTAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------ 638,415 265,890 261,735 49,639 376,682 358 376,322 59 STREET DIVISION AQMINISTRATION ANQ SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 457,345 190,530 188,328 49,621 269,017 269,017 54 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 190,050 79,175 74,141 17,998 115,910 115,904 61 TOTAL COMMODITIES 16,000 6,665 6,253 1,068 9;747 9,747 61 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3.ODD 1,250 3,000 14 10- D TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 666,395 277,620 271,722 68,687 394674 - 10 -344,663 59 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILOINGS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 206,315 85,960 73,011 19,221 133,304 133,304 65 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82,250 34,260 24,582 5,401 52,668 52,668 64 TOTAL COMMODITIES 83,000 34,560 34,959 7,303 48,041 19 48,022 58 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 8,000 3.330 8.000 13 7.487 100 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDS 379,565 158,110 137,552 31,925 242,013 32 241,981 64 136,500 56,865 74,518 10,869 61,982 61,982 45 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22,500 9,370 9,681 469 12,814 115 12,704 56 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,600 2,330 1,063 30 4,537 4,537 81 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,700 1.120 669 29 2,031 2,031 75 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 167,300 69,685 85,931 11,397 81,369 115 81,254 49 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL STREET DIVISION 28,640 32 42,695 STREET MAINTENANCE 42,327 76 21,973 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 90,695 37,780 62,055 5,718 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 55,500 23,125 12,805 8,283 TOTAL COMMODITIES 36,600 15,240 14,627 5,048 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,563,500 7,492 651.445 465,823 217.561 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 1,746,295 100 727,590 556,310 236,610 SNOW REMOVAL 190,885 133 190,752 88 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 92,570 38,570 11,859 3,002 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,500 3,120 14.518 TOTAL COMMODITIES 85,000 35,415 77,666 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 30,500 12.705 12.826 12,826 TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL 215,570 89,810 24,685 15,828 LEAF REMOVAL 8,804 63 55,092 201 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 67,485 28,110 4,337 456 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 158,100 277 157,822 82 TOTAL COMMODITIES 16,500 6.870 1,982 380 TOTAL LEAF REMOVAL 83,985 34,980 6,319 836 STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENANCE 57 23,276 19 23,257 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 42,305 17,620 16,000 3,945 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74,000 30,830 54,017 14,766 TOTAL COMMODITIES 14,000 5.830 5.196 2,727 TOTAL STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTE 130,305 54,280 75,213 21,438 FORESTRY 3.500 3,500 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 199,865 83,265 86,792 15,434 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 193,000 80,405 34,901 17,879 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9.600 3,995 5,041 616 TOTAL FORESTRY 402,465 167,665 126,734 33,929 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 64,369 61 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 51,315 21,375 22,059 3,289 TOTAL COMMODITIES 26,700 11,115 3,424 617 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,000 1,250 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 81,015 33,740 25,483 3,906 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATIQN TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 34,815 14,500 9,440 1,291 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,350 2,225 300 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3.500 1.455 TOTAL PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATIO 43,665 18,180 9,740 1,291 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 11,555 4,810 4,522 322 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,550 6,470 2,491 2,491 TOTAL COMMODITIES 23,500 9.780 1,610 52 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY 50,605 21,060 8,623 2,865 EW IPMENT MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 104,685 43,605 40,316 6,009 PAGE 19 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 28,641 28,640 32 42,695 368 42,327 76 21,973 21,973 60 1 096 6 7 8,798 1.0157,879 70 1,189,986 9,166 1,180,819 68 60,711 80,711 87 7,500 8 7,492 100 85,000 85,000 100 17,674 125 17,549 58 190,885 133 190,752 88 63,148 63,148 94 0 14.518 14,518 88 77,666 77,666 92 26,305 26,305 62 19,983 201 19,782 27 8,804 8,804 63 55,092 201 54,891 42 113,073 113,073 57 158,100 277 157,822 82 4,559 1 4.558 47 275,732 278 275,453 68 29,257 29,256 57 23,276 19 23,257 87 3,000 3,000 100 55,533 19 55,513 69 25,375 25,375 73 0 5,050 32 5,018 94 3.500 3,500 100 33,925 32 33,893 78 7,033 7,033 61 13,059 58 13,001 84 21.890 21,990 93 41,982 58 41,924 83 64,369 64,369 61 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 95 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL STREET DIVISION EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195,000 81,245 190,691 36 4,309 4,309 2 TOTAL COMMODITIES 128,500 53,535 44,073 7,296 84,427 84,427 66 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,000 830 1,124 876 876 44 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 430,185 179,215 276,204 13,341 153,981 153,981 36 _POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 5,225 2,170 1,772 181 3,453 3,453 66 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,000 2,495 5,692 309 308 5 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10,000 4,160 6,483 1,078 3,517 3,517 35 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,500 625 1.500 0 TOTAL POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 22,725 9,450 15,447 1,259 7,279 7,278 32 TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIGHTING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,125 1,300 957 121 2,168 2,168 69 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 248,000 103,330 56318 18,604 191,282 191,282 77 TOTAL COMMODITIES 7,000 2,915 1,307 102 5,693 6 5,687 81 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 49,000 20.410 2,757 46,243 40 46,203 94 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIG 307,125 127,955 61,739 18,827 245,386 46 245,340 80 TOTAL STREET DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 4,727,200 1,969,340 1,681,702 462,139 3,045,503 10,D90 3,035,408 64 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SURPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 438,895 182,840 157,289 31,268 281,606 281,606 64 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 559,300 233,000 215,542 50,667 343,758 10 343,748 61 TOTAL COMMODITIES 28,500 11,865 10,598 2,174 17,902 17,902 63 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,000 1,250 3,725 725 725- 10 735- 25 - TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 590.75 246,130 82.577 508,175 508.173 86 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,620,445 675,085 469,731 84,834 1,150,716 20 1,150,694 71 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 41,425 17,255 10,997 2,520 30,428 30,428 73 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6,500 2,705 1,986 283 4,514 4,514 69 TOTAL COMMODITIES 12,DDD 4,995 1,650 245 10,350 10,350 86 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,5 625 1.500 1,5 100 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDS 61,425 25,580 14,633 3,048 46,792 46,792 76 MAINTENANCE OF §,,ROUNDS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 37,085 15,450 21,274 273 15,811 15,811 43 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,400 2,250 1,081 4,319 4,319 80 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 7.500 3,125 7500 7.500 100 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 49,985 20,825 22,355 273 27,630 27,630 55 WATER SUPPLY MAINTE1dANCE & REPAIR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 148,755 61,975 58,449 10,405 90,306 90,306 61 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 94,000 39,160 20,379 3,539 73,621 37 73,584 78 TOTAL COMMODITIES 21,500 8,955 5.066 354 16.434 16.434 76 TOTAL WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE & R 264,255 110,090 83,894 14,298 180,361 37 180,324 68 WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. & REPR. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 150,220 62,585 61,113 10,602 89,107 89,107 59 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PAGE P1 UNEXPENDED UNENCUN X BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE RAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT, & REPR. TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40,100 16,700 5,960 960 34,140 166 33,974 85 TOTAL COMMODITIES 50,700 21,120 12,560 4,426 38,140 38,140 75 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 96.500 40,205 1,456- 97,956 180 97.776 101 TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. & 337,520 140,610 78,177 15,988 259,343 346 258,997 77 WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 98,825 41,175 43,566 7,211 55,259 55,259 56 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,600 665 674 927 926 58 TOTAL COMMODITIES 36,700 15,290 11,404 2,638 25,296 25,296 69 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAIN 137,125 57,130 55,644 9,649 81,481 0 59 81,482 WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.& REPT.. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 84,035 35,010 39,263 5,442 44,772 44,772 53 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,500 15,620 6,568 404 30,932 316 30,616 82 TOTAL COMMODITIES 84,600 35,240 16,182 4,392 68,418 3 68,415 81 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES U TOTAL WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.& RE 206,135 85,870 62,013 10,238 144,122 319 143,803 70 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS 143,120 59,620 64,112 14,672 79,008 79,OD8 55 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 105,500 43,955 103,146 36 2,354 2,354 2 TOTAL COMMODITIES 100,700 41,950 31,821 5,122 68,879 68,879 68 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 8.400 3.500 4,021 426 4.380 8 4,371 52 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPER 357,720 149,025 203,100 20,256 154,621 8 154,612 43 SANITARY SEWER MAAINT, & REPAIR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 71,870 29,940 42,972 8,494 28,898 28,898 40 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,200 7,995 4,344 3,750 14,856 14,856 77 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11,000 4,580 2,892 1,474 8,108 1 8,107 74 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 13 000 5,410 4.399 8,601 8.601 66 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER MAINT. & REPA 115,070 47,925 54,607 13,718 60,463 1 60,462 53 WATER SYSTfM INPROYEMENTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 115,000 47,915 1,327 6,800 113.673 2,132 111,541 97 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 115,ODO 47,915 1,327 6,800 113,673 2,132 111,541 97 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 100,000 41.665 1.368 956 _ 98,632 10 98.622 99 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 100,000 41,665 1,368 956 98,632 10 98,622 99 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,750 1,140 2,750 2,750 100 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,985,000 1,243,740 1,185=259 263,063 1,799,741 1.799.741 60 TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISIT2,987,750 1,244,880 1,185,259 263,063 1,802,491 1,802,491 60 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 6,352,430 2,646,600 2,232,108 443,321 4,120,326 2,873 4,117,449 65 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9(30/91 1941-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION P.DMINISTRATION AND SIPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 16,525 6,875 6,997 1,264 9,528 9,528 58 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43,850 18,270 22,124 3,330 21,726 21,726 50 TOTAL COMMODITIES 0 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 60,375 25,145 29,121 4,594 31,254 31,254 52 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,360 2,650 2,266 462 4,094 4,094 64 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,800 4,490 2,318 583 8,482 8,482 79 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,800 2,410 1,217 453 4,583 4,583 79 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 134,650 56.100 93,650 41.000 52 40,948 30 TOTAL PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 157,610 65,650 99,451 1,498 58,159 52 58,107 37 TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 217,985 40,795 128,572 6,092 89,413 52 89,361 41 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 46,885 19,530 28,644 6,698 18,241 18,241 39 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,093,650 872,340 719,857 202,575 1,373,793 331 1,373,462 66 TOTAL COMMODITIES 72,500 30,205 68,681 2,823- 16,181- 16,181- 22 - TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3.975 3,975- 3,975 - TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 2,213,035 922,075 841,157 206,450 1,371,878 331 1,371,547 62 TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 2,213,035 922,075 841,157 206,450 1,371,878 331 1,371,547 62 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 838,000 349,160 34,699 5,123 803,301 134 803,167 96 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 49.000 20,415 49.000 49,000 IOD TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 887,000 369,575 34,699 5,123 852,301 134 852,167 96 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40D,000 166,660 28,405 2,490 371,595 371,595 93 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,242,300 1,350,950 144,704 31,049 3,097,596 11,795 3,085,801 95 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 101.000 42 080 101.000 101.000 100 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 3,743,300 1,559,690 173,109 33,539 3,570,191 11,795 3,558,396 95 COMNUNITY IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,800 2,000 4,800 4,800 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 30,000 12.500 17.636 3.802 12.364 12,364 41 TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 34,800 14,500 22,436 8,602 12,364 12,364 36 POLICEIFIRE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4,400,000 18, 33.330 429,672 202.630 3 970 328 1.400 3 4 8 90 TOTAL POLICE/FIRE BUILDING CONSTRU4,400,000 1,833,330 429,672 202,630 3,970,328 1,900 3,968,428 90 GENERAL EQUIP & IMPRVMNTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 100.000 41,665 10,374 6.959 89,626 38 89,588 90 TOTAL GENERAL EQUIP & IMPRVMNTS 100,000 41,665 10,374 6,959 89,626 38 89,588 90 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 1.086,220 77 1,086,222 1,086,220 t#1TOR EQUIPMENT POOL 62,941 62,941 74 62,941 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 558,500 232,685 374,323 8,621 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL 558,500 232,685 374,323 8,621 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ------------------------------------------ 9,723,600 4,051,445 1,044,613 265,474 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES COMMUNITY GROUPS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 22.700 9,455 16,114 4,143 TOTAL COMMUNITY GROUPS 22,700 9,455 16,114 4,143 4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS ETC, TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 13,100 5,450 14,071 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,000 7,075 16,268 1,535 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11,500 4380 3.030 15 TOTAL 4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS, 41,600 17,305 33,369 1,550 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,180 1,325 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,000 4,580 3,000 3,000 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11000 415 TOTAL HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 15,180 6,320 3,000 3,000 TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ------------------------------------------ 79,480 33,080 52,483 8,693 LIBRARY SERVICES lI@BABY OPERATIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2 823 655 1,176,510 TOTAL LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2,823,655 1,176,510 TOTAL LIBRARY SERVICES ------------------------------------------ 2,823,655 1,176,510 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL 0$LIGATION BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1.414,175 589,195 327,955 3.643 TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 1,414,175 589,195 327,955 3,643 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 84,990 35=400 22,049 1,555 TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS 84,990 35,400 22,049 1,555 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ------------------------------------------ 1,499,165 624,595 350,004 5,198 PENSION FUNDS EMPLOYEE PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 36,6 15,245 15,25 3=050 TOTAL EMPLOYEE PENSIONS 36,600 15,245 15,250 3,050 PAGE 23 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 184,177 1,581 182,596 33 0 184,177 1,581 182,596 33 8,678,987 15,448 8,663,539 89 6.586 186 6,400 28 6,586 186 6,400 28 971- 971- 7- 732 732 4 8,471 22 8,4b8 73 8,232 22 8,209 20 3,180 3,180 100 8,000 60 7,940 72 1.000 1.000 100 12,180 60 12,120 80 26,998 268 26,729 34 2 82 655 2,823,655 10D 2,823,655 2,823,655 100 2,823,655 2,823,655 100 1,086,222 1.086,220 77 1,086,222 1,086,220 77 62,941 62,941 74 62,941 62,941 74 1,149,163 1,149,161 77 21,350 21,350 58 21,350 21,350 58 VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PENSION FUNDS POLICE PENSIONS _ TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 543.000 226,245 206,124 41,445 TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS 543,000 226,245 206,124 41,445 FIREMENS PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 578.000 240,825 216.907 46,462 TOTAL FIREMENS PENSIONS 578,000 240,825 216,907 46,462 TOTAL PENSION FUNDS 1,157,604 482,315 438,281 90,957 PAGE 24 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 336.876 336 876 _-§9 336,876 336,876 62 361,093 361,093 R 361,093 361,D93 62 719,319 719,319 62 VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERF 05 ENDING 9/30/91 1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL TOTAL BUDGET EXPENSE 45,393,525 13,757,607 18,912,030 2,560,711 VIL AGE OF MOUNT PROSECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: October 9, 1991 SUBJECT: September 26, 1991 Zoning Board of Appeals Meeting Attached please find a letter from Zoning Board of Appeals member Dennis Saviano concerning his vote on two cases at the September 26 meeting. Mr. Saviano is concerned about the strict application of a variation standard that states "an alleged hardship cannot be created by any person presently having a proprietary interest in the property". In the two specific cases, property owners constructed improvements needing variations without building permits; in effect, creating their own hardship. I thought the Village Board should be aware of Mr. Saviano's opinion. DMC:cl I� WANN SAVIAN CFA, PC -\C CO L ;.\ TrV\ T -\ N D Fal SI`[ SS D\, I S 0 R 1061 Feehamille Dr. Suu -',()! NIt pw'pec[. Minot, 60056 �70Sj 61,�-;0-10 ''mspau OCT 4 1991 TO: David Clements FROM: Dennis Saviano DATE: October 1, 1991 As you are aware, Section 14.605 of the Zoning Booklet deals with standards to be reviewed when a case is presented before the Zoning Board of Appeals. one of the standards is Item 3, which states that an alleged hardship cannot be created by any person presently with a proprietary interest in the subject property being reviewed. Because of this, I recently voted against allowing two variation requests (John Manglardi and George Karahalios) even though it appeared to me that the variations requested were not unusual and will present hardship to the petitioners who may end up needing to relocate the aforementioned structures. Fortunately, the Zoning Board is not final on these matters and can be approved by the Village Board. With the Zoning Booklet being revised, consideration should be given tc somehow revising this Item, because as it currently stands, anyone who has not requested a permit, even if unintentional, has created their own hardship and could not have the variation approved on an after the fact basis. As a result, you may wish to revise the wording of this standard but increase the penalty for permit noncompliance. In this manner, individuals would be deterred from ignoring permits but would allow the Zoning Board to review a case based on its own merits. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER VV �„� p FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-33-V-91, JOHN MANGLARDI LOCATION: 1623 CEDAR LANE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variation application filed by John Manglardi. The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate an existing above -ground pool and deck: 1. Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7 ft. rather than 10 ft.; and a rear yard setback of 7 ft. rather than 15 ft, as required by Code. 2. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck and the house deck. The decks are attached. 3. Section 21.601.A.1 to allow a 6 ft. fence along the rear and side lot lines rather than 5 ft. as permitted by Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 22, and September 26, 1991. At the initial public hearing, Mr. Manglardi explained that he had installed a pool without a permit, and that variations were necessary to allow it to remain in its present location. He pointed out that a deck was also constructed between the house and the pool, and that relocating the pool would require extensive changes to the deck. Stewart VanMeter of 1622 Dogwood stated that he has concerns about the location of the pool, and that it was prominently visible from his property to the rear of the petitioner's home. Mr. VanMeter distributed pictures showing the appearance of the pool from his home. The Zoning Board of Appeals continued the request to allow the petitioner and Mr. Van Meter to discuss alternatives. At the September 26 meeting, Mr. Manglardi stated that he had added a variation request for a 6 foot fence to the application. He believed the 6 foot fence would help screen the pool and be satisfactory to the neighbor. John Ful - n Dixon Page Two October 7, 1991 Stewart VanMeter acknowledged that he met with the Manglardi's and that the fence would resolve some of the neighbors concerns. But he still had concerns about the size and location of the pool. The Zoning Board discussed the request. Some members stated that installing the 6 ft. fence is a good attempt to meet the neighbors concerns. They also stated that similar setback variations have been granted for other pools and that the variations are relatively minor. Other members expressed concerns about this being a self-created hardship and that the standards for variation have not been met. Accordingly, by a 2-4 vote the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of variations to Section 21.902.A to allow a 7 ft. sideyard and 7 ft. rear yard setback. Also by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of variations to Section 14.102.8.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool and house decks; and to Section 21.601.A.1 to allow installation of a 6 ft. fence along the side and rear property lines. 1k +,w2 .r ,ei.' t J "�' T ^►°� Mr`4s ', wN ►/r,� "" a " v n " ^,�"' 3^�. yew a�` �` .Y1'1" *' d;P «'.v '».yJ �' �"?. ��'K�Mli•:'�i +,y«�� � +'�Y' �+ «y��„'" .�., � "i �aY,r y,',,,r^,,i9 y, 1+». I*"� , GW�aY► �r 'rir�jt{ dLQ k 1 1� a f � tag 6 '+�i�abdl , li visl , 3n 'tht Etat' 1/2 Rr � i/ o;�•�'+woti+sr 2!S S' �► � "« .' �►,.x Rt' ttayr 7tq�� PrincipAl Kgri�#Ssti�� " 4 r 14 Jppf�w���y GST', � r � V� „. +Nl �, •.,n � T " ^ L-A*El �+,�Vj (�/�"�"y/� ■■�%�"■■■may K '«Wp�M y,'j", t � .' w9� ,.,� � . ry f „. .�'�A � 3- V!9/ In MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 33-V-91 Hearing Date: September 26, 1991 PETITIONER: John Manglardi SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1623 Cedar PUBLICATION DATE: September 10, 1991 REQUEST: Variation from Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7' rather than 10'; and a rear yard setback of 7' rather than 15'. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attached. Section 21.601.A.1 to allow a 6' fence along the side and rear property lines. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano ABSENT: Richard Pratt OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Stewart and Doris Van Meter Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that it has been continued from the July 18, 1991 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. The petitioner is requesting variations from Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7' rather than 10'; and a rear yard setback of 7' rather than 15' as required by Code. A variance is also requested from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attached. Also from Section 21.601.A.1 to allow a 6' fence along the side and rear property lines rather than 57 as permitted by Code. The petitioner, John Manglardi, of 1623 Cedar, presented the case stating that he has met and discussed the situation with his neighbors and they have agreed that a 6' fence along the rear and side lot lines would be sufficient. ZBA-33-V-91 September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 4 Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, Ftated Lhat the RRove-ground pool was installed without a permit and is located 7" from the si,dp and rear lot lines. Miss Farnham stated that she met with the Manglardi's and the Van Meter's and discussed a 6' fence and more Jandscaping. She also stated that they had discussed relocating the pool 5' to the north which would allow a 12' rear yard and also 3' to the west which waild eliminate the sideyard variation. Staff" does not object to the 6' fence. Mr. Manglardi stated that to move the pool would be difficult and he would still need a variation for the 12' rear yard. Mr. Manglardi then presented a petition from his neighbors stating tht they do not object to the pool at the present location. He also stated it would be a hardship to move the Pool. Stewart Van Meter of 1622 Dogwood stated that he met with Mr. Manglardi on July 30, 1991. Mr. Van Meter stated that Mr. Manglardi stated he would put up to G' fence and landscaping. Mr. Van Meter continued stating that Mr. Manglardi also said he would contact the neighbors on Dogwood and has not done so. Mr. Van Meter stated that he feels these neighbors have strong concerns about the size and location of the pool. Chairman Basnik questioned the concrete blocks around the pool. Mr. Manglardi stated that they are not permanent and will be disposed of. He also stated that he recently had a fire at his home and the pool has not been a priority. The Board then generally discussed the case. Mrs. Skowron stated that because of the petitioners situation this should have been postponed until a later date and feels the neighbors should be able to respond. Mr. Lannon stated that a 3' variation is relatively minor and should be approved. Mr. Saviano stated that the Village Board should consider the situation of the required building permit. He stated that the petitioner has made an attempt to meet the neighbors concerns and feels the other neighbors would be here or written letters if they have concerns. Mrs. Skowron stated that the Board is here to make the decisions for neighbors that do not attend. 13 ZBA-33-V-91 September 26, 1991 Page 3 of 4 Mr. Brettrager stated that he is tired of self-created hardships and does riot feel the Board should resolve them for the petitioners. Mr. Lannon stated that the owner did not realize a permit was needed. Mr. Cassidy stated that the issue is whether the request meets the standards for variations listed in the Code. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request from Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard of 7' rather. than 10' and a rear yard of 7' rather than 15' as required by Code with an amendment that landscaping be approved by Staff. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Skowron NAYS: Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik Motion denied by a vote of 4-2. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck and house deck. Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request from Section 21.601..A.1 to allow a 6' fence along the side and rear property lines. Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. ZBA-33-V-91 September 26, 1991 Page 4 of 4 Mr. Cassidy then moved to prepare resolution Z-33-91 to record the Zoning Board of Appeals approval ofthe Petitioners request for a 6' fence. Mr. Brettrager seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This c;ase must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary N FROM: DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: ADDRESS: LOCATION MAP: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNII, CHAIRMAN W— DAVID A CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 ZBA-33-V-91 JOHN MANGLARDI 1623 CEDAR LANE PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 9,000 sq. ft. (751 x 1201) % COVERAGE: 35.2% F.A-R. : N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 rhe applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate an existing above ground pool and deck: 1. Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7 ft. rather than 10 ft.; and a rear yard setback of 7 ft. rather than 15 ft. as required by Code. 2. Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attached. 3. Section 21.601.A-1 to allow a 6 ft. fence along the rear and side lot lines rather than 5 ft. as permitted by Code. PLANNING AND ,Z!QNING _CQMMENTS,ANj)_ CONCERNS Summary of application: This case was continued from the July 18, 1991 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting to allow the applicant to work with the neighbors in resolving their concerns. As previously stated, the applicant installed a 16' x 32' oval, above -ground pool and deck without a permit, He states that he was unaware of the permit requirements. The pool is located too close to the rear and side lot lines. In addition, the pool deck is connected to an existing deck attached to the house. Variations are requested to allow the pool and deck to remain in their existing locations. To accommodate the neighbor's concerns about views to the pool, the applicant is also proposing to install a 6 ft. solid wood fence along the rear and side lot lines. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: As installed, the pool is 7 ft. from both the rear and side lot lines. The pool itself is 25 ft. from the house. A raised wood deck attached to the pool is also attached to a ground level deck attached to the house. This results in no separation between principal and accessory structures where a 10 ft. separation is required by Code. Staff notes that the location of underground utility lines dictates that the pool be located in the southeast half of the rear yard. Staff further notes that shifting the pool 3 ft. to the west would eliminate the sideyard setback variation. In addition, shifting the pool to the north so it abuts the house deck would increase the rear yard setback to 12 ft. However, a rear yard variation would still be required. Staff also notes that it is impossible to locate the pool anywhere in the rear yard without variations unless the deck attached to the house is removed. The applicant stated that an attempt was made to place the pool in a location that would maximize the usable open lawn area. Landscaping on the applicant's and neighbor's lots provide some screening. The pool is not visible from the street and the rear yard is entirely enclosed with a fence. The applicant is proposing to replace the existing chain-link fence with a 6 ft. wood fence to provide additional screening from the neighbors. Staff also notes that lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed. if pool is included, lot coverage totals 40.8%. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 No major objections were stated by other Village staff. Engineering notes that the pool should discharge into the storm sewer. Inspection Services requests that a permit be obtained "after -the -fact" to validate the pool and deck. SUMMARYIRECOMMENDATION Staff notes that it would be impossible to locate a pool in this yard at the required setbacks without removing the deck attached to the house. However, the pool could be located in a position that would eliminate the requested sideyard variation and reduce the rear yard variation requested. However, this would require relocating the existing pool. The applicant should address the feasibility of this action. Staff also notes that a similar request for pool setback variations was approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals in April. Staff has no objections to the request for a 6 ft. fence which will provide additional privacy and screening for the neighbors. DMC:hg M MINI-7ES OF THEI REGULAR MEE"17ING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO, 33--L'-91 Hearings Date: July 18, 1991 PETITIONER: John, Manglardi S11"BJFCT PROPERTY: 1623 Cedar PUBLICATION DATE: June 11, 1991 REQUEST: Variation from Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7' rather than 10'; and a rear yard setback of 7' rather than 15'. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attached. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano ABSENT: None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Stewart and Doris Van Meter Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that it has been continued from the June 27, 1991 Zoning Board of Appeals s meeting. The petitioner is requesting variations from Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7' rather than 10'; and a rear yard setback of 71 rather than 151 as required by Code. A variance is also requested from section 14-102-B-1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attached. The petitioner, John Manglardi, of 1623 Cedar, presented the case stating that he installed the pool 7' from the sideyard and rear yard. Mr. Manglardi stated that he put the pool in for his children and did not realize a permit was needed. Mr. Stewart Van Meter, of 1.622 Dogwood stated that he is concerned that no permit was issued before the pool and deck were put in. Mr. Van Meter stated that a registered ZBA-33-V-91 July 18, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Letter.~ t,:as senr to \1', "lang-lardi by the Vill,age of Mount Prc..)spect last summer and until this year no attempt was made to obtaLn a permitMr» Van 11eter also stated that the petitionf-_xr contacted him at, 6:45 p.m. this evening regarding the variatlorjs. `'Cr. "'an Meter stated that the pool changes the character of the neighborhoo,,_-1 and would like an 8' fence installed. to block, the view of the pool. from his property which is directly behind the petitioners property. Mr. Lannon questioned when Mr. Van Meter trimmed his shrubbery in the back of his property from 8' to 6'. Mr, Van Meter stated that. he trims the shrubs every spring. %1r. Lannon asked Mr. Van Meter if the pool was installed according to Code would he be satisfied ? Mr. Van Neter stated that he would like an 8' fence to block the view. Mr. Basnik stated that he went to the petitioners home and looked at the pool and from the rear view it looked terrible. Mr. Basnik stated that the water run-off goes to Mr. Van Meters yard and feels the size of the pool should be changed. Mr. Pratt asked Mr. Manglardi if he has a solution to the problem and if he is willing to work it out with his neighbor. Mrs. Skow-ron questioned if granting variances after -the -fact, due to someone installing something without a permit will set a precedent. Mr. Pratt agreed with Mrs. Skowron's concern. Mr. Brettrager asked whatever happened to the registered letter stating that Mr. Manglardi. should have known about the permit when he received notification. Mr. Basnik stated that he feels the variations are too large. Mrs. Manglardi, of 1623 Cedar, stated that she is very offended by Chairman Basnik's remark on the rear view of her home. Mr. Van Meter suggested that he and Mr. Manglardi come up with a solution to satisfy both parties and then present that to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Manglardi agreed. 6 ZBA-33-1t-91 July is, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to continue this case at the September 26, 1991 meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals at the petitioners requeW Mrs. Skowron moved. '.,lr. Lannon seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None !fotion carried by a vote of 7-0. This case is continued to September 26, 1991. I Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary a M MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 33-V-91 Hearing Date: June 27, 1991 PETITIONER: John Manglardi SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1623 Cedar PUBLICATION DATE: June 11, 1991 REQUEST: Variation from Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7' rather than 10'; and a rear yard setback of 7' rather than 15'. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attatched. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Stu Van Meter, Bernie McCudden Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner is requesting variations from Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 71 rather than 101; and a rear yard setback of 7' rather than 15' as required by Code. Also, from section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attatched. The petitioner, Vince Manglardi representing John Manglardi, of 1405 S. Busse, presented the case stating that he is John Manglardi's brother who is home sick at this time. Mr. Manglardi stated that the pool was put up 7' from the sideyard and rear yard. He stated that his brother put the pool in for his children and did not realize a permit was needed. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that the pool is 16' x 32' with a raised deck. Miss Farnham stated that the pool and deck were put in without benefit of a permit. The pool deck is attatched to another ZBA-33-V-91 June 27, 1991 Page 2 of 3 de(.zk that is at tatched to the hcs,ase. Miss Farnham stated 'that there is a 10' separation requirement between the pool deck and the house deck. Staff notes that: the :location of Underground utility lines dictates that the pool be located In the Southeast half`" of the rebs yard. Miss Farnham stated. that shifting the pool 3' to the west would eliminate the sideyard setback variation, in addition shifting the pool to the north so it abuts the house deck wouldincrease the rear yard setback to 12'. However, a'rear yard variation would still be required. Miss Farnham stated that there is landscaping around the property and s chain link fence which meets Code. Miss Farnham stated that staff would like the Petitioner to address the,feasibility of relocating the pool. Mr. Lannon questioned why a 10' separation is required between the pool; and, the house. Miss Farnham stated that it is not d fire issue in this case but more of a safety standard, Mr. Cassidy questioned when the pool and deck were constructed. Miss Farnham stated that they were constructed last summer. Chairman Basnik stated that he feels it was ignorance of the petitioner by not obtaining a permit. Mrs. Skowron addressed the petitioner about not obtaining a permit stating it is difficult for her to accept ignorance and asked him to state a hardship. Mr. Manglardi stated that the hardship would be to take down the pool because it cannot be put up without a`variation. Stu Van Meter, 1622 Dogwood, stated that he is directly behind the petitioner and presented pictures to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Van Meter stated that the pool was constructed in 'June of 1990 without a permit. Also, a registered letter was sent to the petitioner in July of 1990 to obtain information on the pool and deck for permit. Mr. Van Meter stated that nothing has been done until this year. He stated that the pool is to close to the lot lines and has caused him drainage problems. Mr. Van Meter stated that this could be resolved by relocating the pool to Village Code or install an 8' wood fence to screen the, pool and act as a sound barrier. 9 ZBA-33-V-91 June 27, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Van Meter if the drainage problem would be resolved if the pool is relocated to Code standards. Mr. Van Meter sated that he feels if there is a 15' rear yard it would resolve the drainage problem. Mr. Van Meter stated that the work was done without a permit and feels it was not ignorance and why didn't the Village of Mount Prospect take action a year ago. Bernie McCudden, 1618 Dogwood. stated that he feels this is bad precedent that it was done without approval. Mr. Lannon questioned the drainage concern asking if the water goes into a storm sewer inlet. Mr. Van Meter stated that water stands and feels the pool is located in a low spot in the petitioners yard. Mr. Manglardi stated that the deck is causing no drainage problems and there are two other pools in the immediate neighborhood, one on Cedar and one on Dogwood. Mr. Pratt suggested shrubbery for screening, noting that it would be difficult for the Zoning Board of Appeals to support a request for an 8' fence. Mr. Cassidy stated that he would like Mr.'John Manglardi to address these concerns and issues in person. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to continue the case to a later meeting pending Mr. John Manglardi presence. Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Pratt seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This case is continued to a later date. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: JUNE 17, 199 CASE NO.: ZBA-33-V-91 APPLICANT: JOHN MANGLARDI ADDRESS: 1623 CEDAR LANE LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 9,000 sq. ft. (751 x 1201) % COVERAGE: 35.2% F.A—F- : N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate an existing above- ground pool and deck: 1. Section 21.902.A to allow a sideyard setback of 7 ft. rather than 10 ft.; and a rear yard setback of 7 ft. rather than 15 ft. as required by Code. 2. Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a zero foot separation between the pool deck (accessory structure) and the house deck (principal structure). The decks are attached. Wit 64" Summary of application: The applicant installed a 16' x 32' oval, above -ground pool and deck without a permit. The pool is located too close to the rear and side lot lines. In addition, the pool deck is connected to an existing deck attached to the house. Variations are requested to allow the pool and deck to remain in their existing locations. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: As installed, the pool is 7 ft. from both the: rear and side lot lines. The pool itself is 25 ft. from the rouse. A raised wood deck attached to the pool is also attached to a ground level deck attached to the house. This results in no separation between principal and accessory structures where a 10 ft. separation is required by Code. Staff notes that the location of underground utility lines dictates that the pool be located in the southeast half of the rear yard. Staff further notes that shifting the pool 3 ft. to the west would eliminate the sideyard setback variation. In addition, shifting the pool to the north so it abuts the house deck would increase the rear yard setback to 12 ft. However, a rear yard variation would still be required. Staff also notes that it is impossible to locate the pool anywhere in the rear yard without variations unless the deck attached to the house is removed. The applicant stated that an attempt was made to place the pool in a location that would allow an adequate area of open lawn to remain intact. Landscaping on the applicant's and neighbor's lots provide some screening. The pool is not visible from the street and the rear yard is entirety enclosed with a chain-link fence. Staff also notes that lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed. OTHER VILLAGE TME COMMENTS No major objections were stated by other Village staff, Engineering notes that the pool should discharge into the storm sewer. Inspection Services requests that a permit be obtained "after -the -fact" to validate the pool and deck. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 Staff notes that it would be impossible to locate a pool in this yard at the required setbacks without removing the deck attached to the house. However, the pool could be located in a position that would eliminate the requested sideyard variation and reduce the rear yard variation requested. However, this would require relocating the existing pool. The applicant should address the feasibility of this action. Staff also notes that a similar request for pool setback variations was approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals in April. DMC:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Z,0%f_. FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-57-A-91, ZBA-58-SU-91, WALGREEN COMPANY LOCATION: 1028 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on the following requests: 1. Amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a Special Use in the B-1 Shopping Center District 2. Special Use Permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow installation of a roof - mounted satellite antenna. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 26, 1991. At the meeting Robert Silverman, Attorney for Walgreen Company, explained that they would like to install a 6 ft. diameter satellite antenna on the roof of Walgreens in Golf Plaza 11 Shopping Center. The satellite antenna would link this store to Walgreen's nation- wide prescription network and it could also be used for in-store management of inventories. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that currently the B-1 Zoning District does not allow non - ground mounted satellite antennas. The proposed text amendment would add standards specific to non -ground mounted antennas which would regulate height, size and screening. Ms. Farnham noted that there are very few properties zoned B-1 in the Village and that they are developed with uses typical of the B-3 District, which allows non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that this item was continued from the last meeting to clarify the specific language of the amendment. Members stated that the language proposed by staff satisfied their concerns. The proposed wording is the same as is found in the B-3 District, thus, the amendment is consistent with existing provisions for satellite antennas. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of an amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B-1 Shopping Center District as proposed by staff. Also by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a Special Use permit to allow installation of a 6 ft. diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna at Walgreens at 1028 South Elmhurst Road. DMC:hg sosn+a Mtu4' n r N l.H..i1 WTM POII.Nq MW V -1f fort OM11c, ALL DIMENSIONS TO BE FIELD VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR DOJ • -r��afi�• I � b : TION OR ANTENNA N r r t t Lid !`' _ •#'(f+-�--; _ ' (iL it f , 2 It 3 j &PA fir r _ _ PLAN t per{ WALGREENS' ANTENNA $ue N� 11ri �I. 0020 3 R.rbian: Address: j©27J i9,,^uiH CI -t `I NLJ{i(r _ fof",-,FilGf ILt�itidttnl fiv b% AN 31 19�t MNnn . O ��rc -_.. -- -. owipn: 'po Bldg. Cede: Be.. Type: RNA KLEIN & PARTNERS, y STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS 1' 4914 S.W. 72nd. AYE. MtAMI FLORMA 33153 (303} 661-0310 I " P,o r... .# PrJ..tSIN No. WALGREENS' ANTENNA Dat.. Addeo: 101 V'r,W r �w ��h C .— I, ` JAN 31 1991 I Lt, v �' is ,t� H. { Bldg C d - fr fV �'1Y, ✓XT✓� � B se 7YpG � �� RIVA KLEIN & PARTNERS'{ -. STRUCTURAL ENGINEERS - 491: S.W. 72nd. AVE.MIAMI . FLORIDA 33155 } (305) 861-03}0 I Ott# 44AM d ZRIq 59- V-,?/ 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 57-A-91. Hearing Date: September 26, 1991 '58 -SUI -9 t PETITIONER: Walgreen Company SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1028 S. Elmhurst Road PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 1991 REQUEST: Amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B-1 Shopping Center District. Special Use permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano ABSENT: Richard Pratt OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that this Case has been continued from the August 22, 1991 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Chairman Basnik stated that the petitioner is requesting an amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B-1 Shopping Center Districts. Also requested is a Special Use permit per Section 14.170I.C.2 to allow installation of a roof mounted satellite antenna. The petitioner, Robert Silverman, senior attorney for Walgreen Company, presented his case stating that they would like to install a roof top satellite antenna for integrated health care. Mr. Silverman stated that this case was continued upon request of the Zoning Board for specific language. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that by request of the Zoning Board of Appeals this case has been continued to clarify the specific language proposed for the text amendment. Staff has reviewed the ZBA-57-A-91 ZBA-59-SU-91 September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 3 existing satollite antenna regulations in the B-1 District and rpoommpnds that the text of Section 14.1701. C.2 be amended ag follows: 2. Satellite antenna, with a diameter exceeding forty inches (40"), subject to the following: a. The maximum diameter of any antenna shall not exceed eleven feet (111) . b, Any ground -mounted antenna shall be located entirely behind the rear building line and shall not be located within any required side or rear yard. c. Any ground -mounted antenna shall be a minimum of ten feen (10') from a principal building or structure. & Any ground -mounted dish shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height above grade. e. All ground -mounted satellite antennas shall be installed and landscaped so as to be compatible with surrounding properties. f. Supplemental restrictions on all non -ground mounted antennas (including roof and wall -mounted antennas). In addition to the above, the following requirements shall apply: (1) Shall be located on the roof or on the rear side of the building to which they are accessory; (2) Shall have a maximum height as allowed in Section 14.1704; (3) Shall have an overall size and height which are in proportion with the scale of the building to which they are accessory; and (4) Shall be fully screened from view from adjacent roadways and properties (from ground level) with materials which are compatible with the building to which they are accessory. Staff believes that this language addresses the concerns expressed by the Board. t 0 ZBA-57-A-91 ZBA-59-SU-91 September 26, 1991 Page 3 of 3 The Board then generally discussed. the case and had no object ions . Chairman Basnik then entertained. a motion to grant the petitioners request of an amendment to Section 14.1701-C-2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B -I Shopping Center District as outlined in the Staff report. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request of a Special Use permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna. Mr. Lannon moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary Vric:LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL-f PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRER OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-57-A-91, ZBA-58-SU-91 APPLICANT: WALGREEN COMPANY ADDRESS: 1028 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD REQUEST The applicant is requesting an amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B-1 Shopping Center District. The applicant is requesting a Special Use permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna. PIANN,IN!G AND ZONING SUMMARYIRECONIMENU ALI!QN This request was continued to clarify the specific language proposed for the text amendment. Pursuant to discussion at the August 22 meeting, staff has reviewed the existing satellite antenna regulations in the B-1 District and recommends that the text of Section 14.1701.C.2 be amended as follows: 2. Satellite antenna, with a diameter exceeding forty inches (40"), subject to the following: a. The maximum diameter of any antenna shall not exceed eleven feet (11). b. Any ground -mounted antenna shall be located entirely behind the rear building line and shall not be located within any required side or rear yard. c. Any ground -mounted antenna shall be a minimum of ten feet (10') from a principal building or structure. d. Any grour.,j-mounted dish shall not exceed fifteen feet (15') in height above grade. e. All ground -mounted satellite antennas shall be installed and landscaped so as to be compatible with surrounding properties. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 f. Supplemental restrictions on all non -ground mounted antennas (including roof and wall -mounted antennas). In addition to the above, the following requirements shall apply: (1) Shall be located on the roof or on the rear or side of the building to which they are accessory; (2) Shall have a maximum height as allowed in Section 14.1704; (3) Shall have an overall size and height which are in proportion with the scale of the building to which they are accessory; and I (4) Shall be fully screened from view from adjacent roadways and properties (from ground level) with materials which are compatible with the building to which they are accessory. Staff believes that this language addresses the concerns expressed by the Board concerning size, screening, etc. appropriate to the B-1 Zoning District. wurqsff�- 1"I FROM: DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: ADDRESS: LOCATION MAP: Vnr�LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL-i' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN �� DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING AUGUST 13, 1991 ZBA-57-A-91, ZBA-58-SU-91 WALGREEN COMPANY 1028 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD U PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: B-1 Shopping Center District LOT SIZE: N/A % COVERAGE: N/A F.A.R.: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 REQUEST The applicant is requesting an amendment to Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow non -ground mounted satellite antennas as a special use in the B-1 Shopping Center District. The applicant is requesting a Special Use permit per Section 14.1701.C.2 to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna. Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to install a 6 foot diameter satellite antenna on the roof of the Walgreen Store at 1028 South Elmhurst Road. The satellite antenna is needed to link this store to Walgreen's nationwide prescription service. Satellite antennas with diameters larger than 40" are only permitted as a special use. This Walgreen Store is located in the B-1 Shopping Center District which is the only commercial zoning designation that does not permit roof -mounted satellite antennas as a Special Use. The applicant has chosen to seek an amendment to the B-1 text to permit satellite antennas as a Special Use rather than seek a rezoning of the entire shopping center to another commercial zoning designation. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Walgreen's is located in the middle of Golf Plaza 11 Shopping Center. The property is surrounded by commercial development on most sides. However, high-rise residential development is located directly to the south. A primary concern is that residents on the upper floors of these buildings may be able to see the antenna. Walgreen's is proposing that the standards for roof -mounted satellite antennas included in other commercial district Special Use Standards be incorporated into the B-1 Zoning District under Section 14.1701.C.2. One of the standards proposed for satellite antennas is that they be "fully screened from view from adjacent roadways and properties (from ground level)". Walgreen's is proposing a 4 -sided solid box for screening of the antenna. The 7 foot tall screens will be constructed of metal siding painted a cream color to match the color of the antenna. The proposed satellite antenna meets all the other proposed standards for non -ground mounted antennas as follows; 1. The antenna will be located on the roof above the Walgreen Store to which it is an accessory. 2. The proposed 6 foot antenna diameter is less than 1/3 the height of the building (20 ft. building height X 33% = 6.6 ft.). 3. The overall height of the dish including the screening box will be approximately 27.5 ft. Code allows a maximum building height of 30 ft. 4. The antenna will be at least 20 ft. from all property lines. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 5. The antenna and screening will be in scale with the building. While the surrounding high-rise residential buildings are taller than the shopping center, the proposed four-sided solid screening box should provide adequate screening to most residents. Obviously, the antenna must be open to the sky to receive signals. As such, it cannot be entirely screened from view from above. Staff believes that the proposed antenna and screening box will be less objectionable than other existing utility fixtures on the shopping center roof. We have received some calls and a letter from neighbors with concerns about potential interference with television transmission. The applicant should address this issue. OTHER VILIAGE STAFF COMMENTS No concerns or objections were expressed by other Village staff. SUMMARYIRECOMMENDATION Staff has no objections to the requested text amendment or Special Use for a 6 foot diameter roof -mounted satellite antenna. Staff notes that all the standards for roof - mounted antennas have been met (e.g. screening; height). Staff recommends that the text proposed for non -ground mounted antennas be added to the ordinance as Section 1701.C.2.b. DMC:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-60-V-91, GEORGE KARAHALIOS LOCATION: 219 SOUTH LEONARD The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on a variation application filed by George Karahalios. The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2 1/2 ft. side setback for a shed rather than 5 ft. as permitted by Code. The variation will allow an existing shed to remain. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of September 26, 1991. At the meeting, George Karabalios presented testimony in support of the request. He stated that he did not know he needed a permit for the shed and located it in the yard to avoid the trees. He stated that it would be difficult to move the shed as it is supported by six posts which are set in concrete. Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that a solid wood fence encloses the rear yard. The fence and several trees help screen it from the neighbor. Staff believes that the shed is well screened and has no objections to the request, but the yard is quite large, and the applicant should address the possibility of relocating the shed. Yolanda Balkin, affected neighbor directly north of the subject property, expressed concerns about the shed location and believed the setbacks should be enforced. The Zoning Board generally discussed the case. Several members expressed concern about this being a self-created hardship and not meeting this important variation standard. Other members stated that this is a relatively small variation and similar requests for sheds have been approved in the past. Accordingly, by a 3-3 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of a variation to allow a 2 1/2 ft. side setback for a shed to remain in its existing location at 219 South Leonard. DMC: hg Dean R. Crouse & Asso-L.ates, Inc. �"- 1 5' Alinois -'Rtqist&%td Laid Suiveyots AP121L 5C- gpog. .. *W.4499 PLAT OF SURVEY LOT2 IN BARSOCCHI'S SUBDIVISION, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PART OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT OF SUBDIVISION REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES, 15 OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ON NOVEMBER 9, 1977 AS DOCUMENT 12980386. (MORE COMMONLY KNOWN AS: 219 S. LEONARD, ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS) LEONA;ZC) L IBJ. 00911t,le". OF 14 tv I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 60-V-91 Hearing Date: September 26, 1991 PETITIONER: George Karahalios SUBJECT PROPERTY: 219 South Leonard PUBLICATION DATE: September 10, 1991 REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2.5' side setback for a shed rather than the 5' as required by Code. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano ABSENT: Richard Pratt OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Mrs. Balkin of 217 S. Leonard Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2.5' side setback for a shed rather than 5' as required by Code. The petitioner, George Karahalios of 219 South Leonard, presented his Case stating that he put a shed up without a permit 2.51 from the side lot line. Mr. Karahalios stated that he also put up a fence but had a permit for the fence. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that the applicant constructed a 8' x 10' storage shed in his rear yard 2.5' from the side lot line. A permit was not obtained for the shed and the structure does not meet the required 5' setbacks. Miss Farnham stated that the applicant would like to keep the shed at the existing location. She noted that the rear yard is enclosed by a solid wood fence which helps screen the shed from the adjacent neighbor. There are also several trees near the shed that provide additional screening. Mrs. Balkin of 217 S. Leonard stated that she lives next door and this shed was put up without a permit and is 2' from the fence and would like it moved to the required 5'. Mrs. Balkin stated she also objected to the fence which she feels was put in without a permit. ZBA-60-V-91 September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Mr. Harahalios stated that it would be very difficult to move the shed which is,anchored with six posts set in concrete. Mr. Lannon questioned if Mrs. Balkin objected to the fence or the shed. Mrs. Balkin stated that she is objecting to the shed and feels they should move it to the 5' as required. The Board then generally discussed the case. Chairman Basnik questioned the rationale of the required 5 ft. setback standard. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that there is a minimum setback for open air around a structure. Mr. Saviano discussed the standards, stating that this appears to be a self created hardship. Mr. Brettrager noted that this is the same situation as the Manglardi case -where the petitioner doesn't get a permit and is therefore not aware of the standards. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request from Section 14-102.9.2 to allow a 2.5' setback for a shed rather than the 5' as required by Code. Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brettrager, Skowron NAYS: Savianoy Cassidy, Basnik Motion denied by a vote of 3-3. This Case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VIta AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNII(, CHAIRMAN WC -1 FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-60-V-91 APPLICANT: GEORGE KARAHALIOS ADDRESS: 219 SOUTH LEONARD LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 10,021.7 sq. ft. (75.75'x 132.3') % COVERAGE: 31.4% F.A.R.: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 I , KEQ= rhe applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.102.13.2 to allow a 21/2 ft. side setback lot a shed rather than 5 ft. as required by Code. Summary of application: The applicant constructed a 8' x 10' storage shed in his rear yard 2 1/2 ft. from the side lot line. A permit was not obtained for the shed, and the structure does not meet the required 5 ft. setbacks. The applicant is requesting a variation to allow ,:he shed to remain in its existing location. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant states that the shed was placed in the comer of the lot to avoid existing trees and be relatively inconspicuous. Staff notes that the rear yard is enclosed by a solid wood fence which helps screen the shed "Erom the adjacent neighbor. There are also several trees near the shed that provide additional screening especially from the front yard. Staff also notes that the shed is constructed of wood that is very similar in appearance to the fence which minimizes it's visual impact. Because of the trees in the rear yard, it might be difficult to relocate the shed except toward the center of the yard. The applicant should address any other potential locations that would meet the setback requirements. Engineering notes that a 10 ft. utility easement exists along the rear property line. The shed, being 6 ft. from the lot line, extends 4 ft. in the easement. The applicant should be aware that it is the owner's responsibility to incur costs related to potential relocation or repair resulting from necessary utility work required in the easement. Staff believes that the shed is relatively inconspicuous due to the fact that the yard is fenced; the shed is constructed of wood that closely matches the fence; and the amount of mature evergreen and deciduous trees around the shed provide some screening. However, the applic4at should address whether the shed could be relocated to conform to the required 5 ft. setback Staff has no objections to this request. DMC:hg V1 , LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE IMANM , AGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-61-V-91, SHAMIRAN VARDA LOCATION: 1631 GREENWOOD AVENUE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variation application filed by Shamiran Varda. The applicant is requesting the following variations: 1. Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway. 2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45% front yard lot coverage. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of September 16, 1991. At the meeting, Bruce Thill, Attorney for the petitioner, explained that the circular driveway is requested for safety and aesthetic reasons. He noted the location of Mr. Varda's lot on Greenwood near intersections with Barberry Lane and Wolf Road. He also noted that there are other similar driveways in the neighborhood and this should not affect the aesthetic character of the neighborhood. The petitioner, Shamiran Varda, presented testimony in support of the request. He stated that his family has five vehicles. He also indicated that the proposed width of 14 ft. is necessary to maneuver vehicles around the curve. Julie Farnham, Planner, indicated that construction has begun on the driveway which is framed, but not paved yet. She stated that staff has some question about the need for a 14 ft. wide turn -around. Staff believes a 10 ft. wide turn -around is sufficient for the intended purpose. A narrower turn -around would reduce the amount of front yard lot coverage. The Zoning Board generally discussed the case. Members stated that traffic does get heavy on this block of Greenwood, especially so close to Wolf Road. Several members expressed concern about the proposed 14 ft. driveway width and front yard lot coverage. They stated that they could support a narrower driveway. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a variance to allow a circular driveway with a maximum width of 12 ft. and maximum front yard lot coverage of 42% at 1631 Greenwood Drive, DMC:hg 10,31' 45.99 C N7 In SCALE ks�-O' �� IUIiG III ,�.._._�... —.Me .%Net �� IUIiG III ,�.._._�... —.Me �� IUIiG III ,�.._._�... MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE No. 61-V-91 Hearing Date: September 26, 1991 PETITIONER: Shamiran Varda SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1631 Greenwood Avenue PUBLICATION DATE: September 10, 1991 REQUEST: Variations from Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45% front yard lot coverage. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis gaviano ABSENT: Richard Pratt OBJECTORVINTERESTED PARTIES:Tom Schultz of 1648 Barberry John Manglardi of 1623 Cedar Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway and from Section 14.1102.A to allow 45% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by Code. The petitioner, Bruce Thill, attorney representing the petitioner, presented this case stating that the petitioners home is located at Greenwood and Wolf Road. Mr. Thill stated that there is a high potential for accidents at this intersection, and they have at least two instances a month. Mr. Thill stated that this is a safety issue noting that the petitioners driveway is very close to Wolf Road. He also stated that this would not be the only circular driveway in the neighborhood and will not alter the characteristics. Mr. Lannon questioned the number of vehicles in the family stating that he has noticed 6 cars in the driveway. Mr. Varda of 1631 Greenwood stated that there are only 5 cars on the driveway. Mr. Lannon questioned why aren't two cars parked in the garage. ZBA-61-V-91 September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 3 Mr. Varda stated that they are doing remodeling to their home and are currently using the garage for storage. Mr. Thill noted that a permit, was pulled for the remodeling work. He stated that the circular driveway was not included on the Permit because they had to seek a variation. He also noted that the Front yard lot coverage has been recalculated to 41.7% , with a 14' width for the circular driveway. Chairman Basnik questioned if the remodeling work has been completed. Mrs. Skowron questioned who recalculated the lot coverage. Mr. Thill stated that the remodeling is not done yet and the owner recalculated the lot coverage noting they asked for 45% as the maximum 'but has been calculated to 41.7% . Mr. Cassidy asked if they would reduce the width to 10'. Mr. Varda stated that it has already been dug out at 14', and tO' would not be wide enough. Mr. Cassidy stated that the safety factor applies but feels the lot coverage should be reduced. Mr. Saviano questioned how wide the other circular driveways in the neighborhood are. Mr. Varda stated that he thinks there about 16' wide, enough for two cars. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, questioned the safety issue noting that Greenwood is a local street in the neighborhood. She stated she has been out there several times and has not noticed a lot of traffic. She stated that the front yard lot coverage could be reduced to 39% if the driveway width is reduced to 10'. She noted that 10' in width would be adequate for a turnaround but not for parking. She did note that other circular driveways exist in the immediate neighborhood. Mr. Cassidy noted that traffic is bad at that corner at different times. Thomas Schultz of 1648 Barberry, stated that he lives across the street from the petitioner and there is a concern for safety. Mr. Schultz stated that there have been many accidents at this corner and if cars are parked on the street it makes the situation worse. ZBA-61-V-91 September 26, 1991 Page 3 of 3 John Manglardi of 1623 Cedar, stated that this a very dangerous corner. Mr. Lannon stated that he agrees with the petitioner that the corner is dangerous but feels the driveway width should be reduced to 10'. Mr. Cassidy agreed with Mr. Lannon. Mr. Brettrager agreed with the safety factor but feels the impact on the lot is to much. He stated he would go along with 12' in width. Mr. Thill stated that the driveway is already dug out to 14'. The Board discussed and agreed that 14' is too wide but all agreed to 12' for the width of the driveway. The petitioner agreed. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request from Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a 12' wide circular driveway and from Section 14.1102.A to allow less than 42% front yard lot coverage as shown on exhibit #1. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Saviano seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This Case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois --l-1111--l" - - ------------ 111111 TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN K/ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-61-V-91 APPLICANT: SHAMIRAN VARDA ADDRESS: 1631 GREENWOOD AVENUE LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R -I Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 11,589 sq. ft. (86.7'x 133.6') % COVERAGE: 27%; 45% front yard F.A.R.: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 REQUE The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate a circular driveway. Section 14.3016.A-1 to allow a circular driveway. 2. Section 14.1102A to allow 45% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by Code. c;ummary or application: The applicant is proposing to construct a circular driveway in his front yard. Circular driveways are only permitted by variation. The additional pavement also increases the front yard lot coverage to 45% which exceeds the maximum 35% allowed by Code. Mr. Varda obtained a building permit for foundation repair at the home, but this permit did not include a driveway. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is located on the southwest comer of Greenwood Drive and Wolf Road. The existing and proposed driveways access Greenwood Drive which is classified as a local street. The merits of a circular driveway depend in part on safety factors relative to access onto a busy roadway. The applicant states that the proximity of the driveway to the intersection with Wolf Road increases the potential for accidents. Staff notes that Greenwood Drive is a major access point off of Wolf Road for this neighborhood. Howeve7, the amount of traffic on Greenwood Drive appears to be relatively low, The applicant should justify the need for a 14 ft. wide circular drive. If the driveway is to be used only for a turnaround, a narrower width should suffice. This would also reduce the amount of front yard paving. For example, reducing the driveway width to 10 ft. reduces the front yard lot coverage to 39%. Staff observed two other circular driveways in the immediate neighborhood. One is on the property across the street. OTHER VILLAGE STAEF COMMEM No major concerns were expressed by other Village staff. SUMMAgYIRECOMMENDATIO Staff has some questions about the need for a turnaround on this street. The applicant should demonstrate that the driveway is for safety reasons, rather than for the convenience of drivers in the household. If this request is approved, staff suggests that the turnaround lane be a maximum width of 10 feet. DMC:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-62.V-91, FOUZAT FARRAN RIHANI LOCATION: 108 NORTH MAIN STREET The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variation application filed by Fouzat Farhan Rihani, The applicant is requesting the following variations: 1. Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a 10 ft. wide circular driveway. 2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45.7% front yard lot coverage rather than 35%. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting on September 26, 1991. At the meeting, Mr. Rihani presented testimony in support of the request, He explained that it is very difficult and dangerous to back onto Main Street (Route 83). The circular driveway would provide a turn -around, eliminating the need to back onto Main Street. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that Main Street is classified as an arterial roadway and carries a heavy volume of traffic throughout the day. Staff believes circular driveways are justified on busy arterial roads. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that safety is an overriding issue in this request. According, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a variation to allow a 10 ft. wide circular driveway and 45.7% front yard lot coverage at 108 North Main Street. DMC:hg I o oz "55.0» rn a kp a wood 10,,,fD f a ' O c—KTE iF fF ! f eLe o$, -._. TL+racc orrcPcc osa POPL» a j .,• � 'z 1 � iA � -- t€�s��e>n � � a� c� � # � � I fir` / l r., sscc ar rosL for wPrP ._ .c•+ -t -« CCC s g / Pj ATl a v r r o� n� 3 W L W V6 .. __ �• t. z a o o« te a nz 1° ea N. MAIN STREET 7mdC—' r - Ar 1L A64 t VIL7LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC-t' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: CASE NO.: APPLICANT: ADDRESS: LOCATION MAP: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 ZBA-62-V-91 FOUZAT FARHAN RIHANI 108 NORTH MAIN STREET PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 7,826.5 (551 x 142-3) % COVERAGE: 30.2%; 45.7% front yard F.A.R. : N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate a circular driveway: Section 14.3016A1 to allow a circular driveway. 2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45.7% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by Code. Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a circular driveway in his front yard to eliminate the need to back out onto Main Street (Route 83). Circular driveways are only permitted by variation. The additional pavement increases the front yard lot coverage to 45.7% which also requires a variation. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's property fronts on Main Street (Route 83) which is classified as a major arterial roadway. Traffic on Main Street is quite heavy throughout the day. In addition, vehicles travel at a fairly high speed on Main Street. Backing onto Main Street could be difficult and present a traffic hazard. The proposed driveway will be 10 ft. wide, which is about the minimum width needed for maneuvering a vehicle around the curve. The applicant is also proposing to pave the gap between the existing concrete driveway strips. The applicant's lot is only 55 ft. wide which contributes to the higher degree of front yard lot coverage. A turnaround lane of the same width and length on a typical 65 ft. wide lot would result in an overall front yard coverage of 35.6%. Staff notes that the overall lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed. QTHER VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS No concerns were expressed by other Village staff. Engineering and Inspection Services note that an I.D.O.T. permit is required for the additional access onto Route 83. :5UM—MARY/RECOMMENDATION Staff notes that this would be the only circular driveway in the immediate neighborhood. However, staff believes that circular driveways are justified on busy arterial roadways where ,the potential for traffic hazards is high. Staff recommends approval of the request. DMC:hg Im MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE N10. 62-V-91 Hearing Date: September 26, 1991 PETITIONER: Fouzat Farhan Rihani SUBJECT PROPERTY: 108 N. Main Street PUBLICATION DATE: September 10, 1991 REQUEST: Variations from Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway. Section 14.1102.A to allow 45.7% front yard lot coverage. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano ABSENT: Richard Pratt OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Sill Kalley of 106 N. Main Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway and from Section 14.1102.A to allow 45.7% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by Code. The petitioner, Fouzat Farhan Rihani of 108 N. Main Street, presented his case stating that he lives on Route 83 and the cars go very fast and he can't pull out of his driveway. He stated that this is a safety hazard and has been waiting over 2 months to have the road checked for speeders. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that this will be a 10' wide circular driveway and the lot coverage will be increased to 45.7% noting that this is a narrow 55' wide lot. Bill Kalley of 106 N. Main, stated that there are many accidents on Route 83 and many speeders. He stated that there are no police checking for speeders who go at least 55 m.p.h. The Board discussed the case and had no objections. W-62-091 September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 2 Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request from Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular dri%eway and from Section 14.1102.1 to allow 45.79 front yard lot coverage. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried, by a %,ote of 6-0. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER wk' FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-63-V-91, BRUNO ULASZEK LOCATION: 8 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recomrft6ndation on a variation application filed by Bruno Ulaszek. The applicant is requesting a vd�iafion to Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure rather than 120 sq, ft. as permitted by Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 26, 1991. At the meeting, Bruno Ulaszek explained that he has several pieces of large garden and lawn maintenance equipment and lawn furniture which he would like to store in the proposed structure. Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that this is a very large wooded lot and the proposed structure would be well screened from the affected neighbor. She noted that lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed. Staff's primary concern is the potential to operate a business, out of such a large accessory structure. She noted that the recently passed home occupation ordinance does not permit businesses in accessory structures. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that a driveway will not be installed leading to the structure. They also noted an accessory structure of this size does not appear out of scale on such a large lot. Accordingly, by a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a variation to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure in the rear yard of 8 South Busse Road as shown on the submitted site plan, excluding the 8 ft. driveway. ISKOW a oll I 0 o � N o 8 Un�9nt �' r. •1 x-Y�E E ra. Y� 4 Y Ki G` 1, 0 I MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 63-V-91 Hearing Date: September 26, 1991 PETITIONER: Bruno Ulaszek SUBJECT PROPERTY: 8 South Busse Road PUBLICATION DATE: September 10, 1991 REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure rather than 120 sq. ft. as permitted by Code. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano ABSENT: Richard Pratt OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure rather than 120 sq.ft. as permitted by Code. The petitioner, Bruno Ulaszek of 8 South Busse Road, presented his case stating that he has I acre of land and he owns a tractor lawn mower and snow blower and needs additional storage to park the tractors which are now under plastic. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that the petitioner is requesting to build a 484 sq. ft. accessory building or storage shed. The accessory building is proposed to be 12' from the side lot line, 51' from the house, and 172' from the rear lot line. Miss Farnham noted that Dana Point Apartments are located to the rear of the property. She also noted that the affected neighbor also has two garages. Staff does not support the proposed 8' driveway. She dicussed this with the applicant who stated that the driveway wasn't neccessary. She stated that the petitioner would also like to install an overhead door. Miss Farnham stated that no business may be operated out of an accessory structure. She also noted that the lot coverage is well below the required 45% , and the structure will be ZBA-63-V-91 September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 2 well srreened by existing landsoapirg. Mr. ulaszek stated that he would like a 15' wide overhead door to accommodate a car he would like to store in the winter. He stated that he is not a contractor and will not use this for a home occupation, it wi,13 be used for storage. The Board then generally discussed the case and had no objemions with the 15' door size or the storage of the car. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request to Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq. ft, accessory structure. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skawron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a, vote Of 6 -0 - This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC-f' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-63-V-91 APPLICANT: BRUNO UIASZEK ADDRESS: 8 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential LOT SIZE: 42,504 sq. ft. (99.31 x 3851) % COVERAGE: 10.9% F.&L R. : N/A (3il Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 ItEQUIES Che applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 484 sq. ft. accessory structure rather than 120 sq. ft., as permitted by Code. MOO-) M43M Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct an oversized (484 sq. ft.) storage building in his rear yard. The structure will be used to store garden and yard maintenance equipment. While the structure is similar to a garage, with an overhead door, ihe structure will not be accessed by a driveway. The applicant also stated that he will not use the building for any business activity. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: T'he applicant's lot is very large with several mature trees. The lot is located directly south of a small commercial strip center at the southwest corner of Central and Busse Roads. The proposed building will primarily impact the resident to the south. As proposed, the building will be 12 ft. from the side lot line, 51 ft. from the house and approximately 172 ft, from the rear property line. A mature existing hedge along the south property line will screen the building from the affected neighbor. An existing gravel walkway next to the attached garage will remain. However, staff cannot support construction of the driveway extending back to the storage building shown on the site plan. Staff has discussed this with the applicant who stated that the driveway is not necessary. An access walk 3 ft. - 5 ft. wide leading to the storage building would be acceptable, if needed. The structure itself will be similar in size to a garage. The applicant intends to build it himself and will lower the height of the walls to meet the Code requirement of 10 ft. for an accessory structure. The applicant would also prefer to install an overhead door. Staff's primary concern with an accessory structure of this size is the potential to use the building to operate a business. Home occupations are not allowed except under limited conditions and can only be conducted within the primary structure. The stated intended use of this building is for storage. The applicant should justify the need for such a large storage building. An existing typical sized storage shed will be removed if this structure is built. Staff notes that the adjacent neighbor has an existing attached one - car garage in addition to a detached garage in the rear yard, both of which are accessed by a driveway. !'21UER VILLAGE STAEF COMMEND No concerns or objections were stated by other Village staff. UMMARY/RJECOMMENDATION Staff believes that the ample setbacks proposed and the amount of existing landscaping on 11e lot will sufficiently screen the building from the surrounding properties. Staff's main i.oncem regards the potential to operate a business out of the storage building. The applicant should clearly explain the intended use and justify the need for a 484 sq. ft. storage ':)uilding. qq .� �N +,. :," �� kJ+�'*� srt q"� � r Styr T�"f�+w /•yE , ,f i. x. a r, y .W 7. u "�M -: 4 rwl eww IIII w fAMa' LL:ffi M .. rt+w 3 _ e x` ,yyyyy�y ♦w �y p 1 ♦ w ¢J 4 y,� .* w 1 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-64-SU-91, A. J• ROGERS COMPANY LOCATION: 501 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a Special Use application filed by A. J. Rogers & Company. The applicant is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4156 to include 501 West Algonquin Road in Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit Development. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of September 26, 1991. At the meeting Kathi Rogers, Vice President of A. J. Rogers and Company explained that they acquired the property at 501 West Algonquin Road after the creation of the Roger's Corporate Park Planned Unit Development, and would like to include this property into the P.U.D. A prospective tenant would like to take advantage of the limited retail use recently approved for the P.U.D. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning explained that 501 West Algonquin was physically coordinated into the overall site plan for Rogers Corporate park. He also explained that all the requirements which pertain to the existing P.U.D. would apply to this property if it is incorporated into the P.U.D. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and had no objections. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of an amendment to Special Use Ordinance # 4156 to include 501 West Algonquin in Rogers Corporation Park P.U.D. DMC:hg m Nr cn ALGONQUIN ROAD 01 2OZI, - V'rf,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEt-f PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W/ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-64-SU-91 APPLICANT: A. J. ROGERS COMPANY ADDRESS: 501 WEST ALGONQUIN ROAD LOCATION MAP: -71 T -T. F--- 7 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: 1-1 Light Industrial LOT SIZE: Approximately 2.8 acres % COVERAGE: N/A FA.R.: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman 'Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4156 per Section 14.2201 to include 501 West Algonquin Road in Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit Development. Summary of application: A. J. Rogers & Company acquired the property at 501 West Algonquin after the Rogers Corporate Park P.U.D. was created. They would like to incorporate this property into the existing P.U.D. Consequently, the existing P.U.D. must be amended to expand it's boundaries. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: There are two predominant reasons for this request. First., while 501 West Algonquin is not within the original P.U.D. boundaries of Rogers Corporate Park, the park was designed with features that physically inter -connect these adjacent properties. These features include a common access off Algonquin Road and shared parking. Secondly, a prospective tenant at 501 West Algonquin, would like to be allowed limited retail use, which was recently granted for the P.U.D. The tenant, Chicagoland Processing manufactures commemorative coins and would like to operate a small retail business out of their manufacturing facility. Inspection Services notes that all deed covenants which apply to the original M.D. (i.e. for street lights) should be extended to this property. In addition, the subdivision requirements for sidewalks and street trees will also be required. Engineering notes that an I.D.O.T. permit is required for sidewalk construction along Algonquin Road. Staff has no objections to the requested P.U.D. amendment. The property at 501 West Ma N I 1" 1WRIVIIJ®r - Park P.U.D. DMC:hg F 4 P r)' ', ��u' ". I . (a B�O �RD OF APPF.� I'_ 9 ri r, 'j. C1..`-, D a t eptember 26, ',�9 I. S T 7' T -\r',hur J. Roger,,; c, ip, p a 5 Wo l o n q u in A, 1 -11qA7, Sept,=mbf-_-,r 10, o_991 R I -n Q 11-T, S T An AmendMent to Special. 1.1'se ()rdinance z4156 per Section 14.2201 to include 501 West Algonqk,iin Road into the Rogers Corporate Park PI -tinned L . n i t. De-, elopment . MEIiBERS PRFS7\7: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Dennis Saviano AB` E!�,I Richard Pratt PARTIES:\one Chairman Basnik introduced. this case stating that the petitioner is requesting an amendment to Special Use !ordinance 4156 per Section 14.2201 to include 501. West Algonquin into the Rogers Corporate Park Planned Unit Development. Kathi Rogers, Vice President of Arthur J. Rogers & Company, presented this case stating that they recently acquired the property at 501 West Algonquin and would like to include it into the P.U.D. at Rogers Corporate Park located at Algonquin and Elmhurst Roads. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the amendment of the P.U.D. to include 501 West Algonquin, which was acquired after the P.U.D. was approved-. He noted this property shares a common driveway with the Rogers Corporate Park. Mr. Clements noted that this property would be for a prospective tenant Chicagoland Processing, which would like to take advantage of the limited retail provisions recently approved for the P.U.D. Mr. Cassidy asked if this would cause any future problems. Mr. Clements stated that the P.U.D. requirements will apply 7B1 -64 -s1' -9t September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 2 ,,I ip-,- 11: ho no Ndverse lmpact ,!r. that thIs is in an 1-1 zcning distKat which Ln !hmw ns Phe F,die rs Corporate Park. 7h, Kool then is used the cwe and lmd w oNjections. rhAiwin Basnik then entert3fined a motion to grant the m> °; ,ns r4 rHqueny for an amendment to Special Use *4156 per o--tiln 11.2201 to include 501 West ALgonquin Road into the RogerA rorparate PaK, Planned, Unit De. vel opmente Mr. Vetvrar,-4er qfovedn Nr, Lannon seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviana, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This Case must still be heard before the village Board. Michelle Thompion Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 7, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-65-SU-9t, BLUE JAY BUILDERS LOCATION: 400 EAST BLUE JAY COURT The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a Special Use application filed by Blue Jay Building Corporation. The applicant is requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 4187 per Section 14.1401 to allow patios on certain dwelling units to encroach 10 ft. into the required 20 ft. perimeter yard. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of September 26, 1991. At the meeting, Mario Losacco of Blue Jay Building Corporation, presented testimony in support of the request. He stated that they would like to modify the floor plan of the interior units to increase the living space. This would be done by relocating the inset patios to the back of the building and converting the inset patio space to living area. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the original site plan approved for the Planned Unit Development requires a 20 ft. perimeter yard. The proposed amendment would allow patios to encroach 10 ft. into the perimeter yard. He noted that staff has several concerns with the request, including: 1. Reducing the setback by 50% could significantly reduce the amount of open space and increase the impact on the neighbors. He noted that staff could support a smaller, 6'-8' encroachment. 2. Screening should be increased to minimize the impact on the neighbors. Staff suggests fencing and/or additional landscaping be installed along the north property line or adjacent to the patios. He noted that initially a fence was considered for the north property line but natural landscaping was preferred. Mr. Clements also stated that the petitioner would like the option to allow some end unit patios to encroach into the perimeter yard. He stated that this is within the scope of the legal notice and could be considered a part of this request. John Fulton Dixon Page Two October 7, 1991 Five residents of Highland Avenue which back up to the townhomes expressed concerns with the proposal. They stated that 10 ft. is too close to the lot line for the patios which would infringe on their privacy. They also stated that they would support a fence along the north property line. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request noting that the proposed modification would affect 18 patios - 10 on the north side and 8 on the south. They expressed concerns about the encroachment and the screening. The Zoning Board believed a 6 ft. fence along the north line was a good compromise to meet the needs of the neighbors and the petitioner. They also discussed reducing the patio depth to 8 ft to minimize the encroachment. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of an amendment to Planned Unit Development Ordinance No. 4187 per Section 14.1401 to allow patios to encroach 8 ft. into the required perimeter yard subject to: 1. Maximum patio size shall be limited to 8' x 12'. 2. A landscape: plan to include a 6 ft. solid wood fence along the north property line and planting modifications subject to staff approval. DMC:hg AAA - GS • SIA • 9 t 5rTe Pt,44.4 — t , vi �_i 3 "I I ] i i 1 r 1 r f -• �: i � ;� ,,.� G���E cec�-.tom, IT ` - --' f , i f V-,.LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPER; f PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W/ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: SEPTEMBER 16, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-65-SU-91 APPLICANT: BLUE JAY BUILDERS ADDRESS: 400 EAST BLUE JAY COURT LOCATION MAP: 32 77 - �=J L L] r== r— I I I I L--J-L- PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-3 (Apartment Resident District) - P.U.D. LOT SIZE: N/A % COVERAGE: N/A F -A -R.: N/A ul Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesting an amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance #4187 per Section 14.1401 to allow patios on certain dwelling units to encroach 10 ft. into the required perimeter yard. [a "W00 Summary of application: The applicant hopes to modify the original floor plan of one type of unit available i in the Blue Jay Townhome development. The modification involves relocating the patios on "N' units from their original inset position to a location off the Living room extending into the perimeter yard. This creates a more desirable interior space v.rrangement as the inset patio area will be converted to living/dining room area. The plan depicts these modifications to the units. The applicant is proposing 10' x 10' patios, which would extend 10 ft. into the 20 ft. perimeter yard established on the originally approved P.U.D. site plan. Consequently, the 11.1J.D. must be amended to accommodate such a significant plan modification. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The patio relocation is proposed for ..0 of the 21 dwelling units included in the original M.D. site plan. Six of these patios would extend toward the north property line, and four would extend toward the South property line. The north property line abuts single family lots which front onto Highland Avenue. The south property line abuts a large lot with a single family home. Staff has several concerns with the proposal. These include: 1. Screening of the patios, especially along the north property line which abuts the rear yards of several single family homes. When this development was originally reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals, some concerns were expressed about screening this development from the residents to the north. A six foot high fence was required along the east property line of this development. However, landscaping rather than a fence was recommended for the north property line. Staff believes that if the perimeter yard is reduced, screening should be increased accordingly to minimize the impact on the neighbors. Screening could be increased by several methods: 1) installing a 6 ft. fence along the north property line; 2) increasing the density of the existing landscape screening along the north property line; 3) installing screening fences around the patios; or 4) installing landscape screening around the patios. The applicant should address the feasibility of these alternatives. 2. Staff is generally concerned about decreasing the existing 20 ft. perimeter yard by 50%. Staff discussed this with the applicant who indicated a willingness to reconfigure the patios to 8' x 12' dimensions. This would result in a setback of 12 feet. Staff notes that the R -X, R-1, R -A and R-2 Districts permit patios to come as close as 15 fL to the rear property line. While a minimal encroachment is preferred, patios must be at least 6 ft. wide for functional purposes. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 Staff also notes that in the Evergreen Woods Townhome development, 8' x 10' patios were permitted to encroach into the 25 ft. setback. However, because of the larger perimeter yard, the patios maintain a minimum 15 ft. setback. Staff also has concerns about drainage and grading in the perimeter yard. A drainage swale exists near the center of the north perimeter yard. Filling or regrading to accommodate patios might result in the need to regrade the drainage swale. Obviously, minimizing the width extension of the patio will minimize the impact on the existing drainage swale. OTHER VILLAGE STAFF COMMEND Engineering and Inspection Services both note that grading in the north perimeter yard is critical. Detail grading plans must be submitted to determine if patios can be constructed there without altering the required swale drainage. No other concerns were expressed by other Village staff. SIMMARYIRECOMMENDATION Staff cannot support the proposed 10 ft. encroachment into the perimeter yard, particularly on the north side. Staff could support an extension of 6 ft. - 8 ft. provided: Additional fencing or landscaping is installed either along the north property line or abutting the patios; and 2. Patios can be constructed without altering the required drainage swale. DMC:hg uo qovdwT aRq aonpad PTnom VuTouaj jo XuidvosPuvl TVUOTqTPPV -VUTu9aJ0s TvuOT4TPPv q4Tm 4uawRouojoua 8-19 P 4joddns PTnom jjvqs quqq Pa4-4s 9H -,01 oq p-onpaj aq PTnom 4T TRsodoad sTqq RqTm pup PJUS IsaJ OZ u STuO svq 'G'fQ'd aql 4BR4 Pa4ou 9H -VaJP �UTUTP/�UTATJ J9�duT v 4Tun aqq �UTAT� STIRVTTs UvTd JOOTJ @144 J94TP PTnom soTqpd ai4q $Wl4po oTazl 'OVu sJvaS Z STaqswixojdd-e PaAoiddu sem 'G'n'd aqq lsq4 Pa4v4s s4uam9T3 -JW 'uvTd aqTs -G-n-d P@Aoiddv 1STTvuT2TJ0 aq4 uO P9qs'Tqvqsa pipS jaqatuTiad OZ alqq oquT ol Pua-4xa PTnom qoiqm SOTqud ,OT x SOT VuTsodoad si 4UV0TTddE aqq qVMq paqVqS VUTUOZ Pup �UTuuUTd JO J0'40aJT(j 's4u9waTD PTAua -pavA jaqawTiad OZ aqq oqul 01 pua4xa PTnom MOTqM soiqvd OT x OT PTTnq oq 2?uTsodoid si aR pa4uqs aH -vaip Wooj VUTATT Jo sass uaq04TN Ja2?J'BT v 4uvm PTnOm Sa44 PaIV4S aAV4 Pup ST@POul aqq njq4 alU00 aA814 aTdoad 4uM4 paquis 000vSoq IJW *PaJP WUTATT OT VaJV OTq-ed aqq FUT4JaAU00 sq s4Tun alq4 uT aowas,AUTATT JO aZ'TS a44 aSBaJOUT 04 aNTT PTnom aq quq4 �uTqvqs aseD STq pa4uasaid 'UOT4,eaodjo0 '8UTPITng Apr anTq To 000usol oljvkl 'a@u0-PTqad aqj -pavS ja4amijad PaJTnbaj aqq oqui ,OT qopojoua oq sqTun �UTTTamP uTv4daO UO SOT4vd mOTTP 04 TOtT'tl uoiqoaS jad L81# # a0UpUTPaO -a-fl-d oq quawpuaiup up pui4sanbaj sT aaUOT414ad aqq qUqq �WT4V4S assn sTq4 paonpoJqUT NTUSVE UPWJIVqj aouaipnV TTna:SHIIHVd 44vdd PJU40TZI :INHSHV OUVIAVS STUUaG UOJMONS aTaVRDTW qjaqoa SPTssvj PTUU08 UOuuvq Ja4ad upmjT,.,qD 'Mlusvg 4aaqlTo - pipS jaqamiaad PaJTnboj aqq 04UT 01 qovojoua 04 slTun '3UTTTOMp UTE4J90 UO SOTqvd moTlu 04 10VI-tT UOT4OaS jad L8Tt# a3upuTPJO -G-a'd 04 quawpuawp uv 166T 101 jaqwaqdas qjnoo Set anTS sJaPTTng Sur anTS T661 193 jaquiaqdas :aVeG $ulduaH :lNasaad SHHSWHW :IsanoHa :HIVG NOIlV3I79Ad :.kldHdOHd IJHfSAS :HaNOIIIIHd 16-iIS-29 'ON aSVJ V9Z SqVHddV 90 GHVOH DNINOZ 10adSOHd INnON alll 30 DNIIHaW UVInDHd alll ,30 S31nNIX ZBA-65-SU-91 September 26, 1991 Page 2 of 3 residents orr Highland which is directly north of the P.U.D. and should. be required. Mr. Clements stated the a 6' fence request is reasonable for screening and would coordinate with the fence constructed along the east property line. Kim Nelson, 409 E. Highland, stated that her home abuts the townhomes and would like a fence installed and does not want any other encroachments. Randy Ridge, 407 E. Highland, stated that he would like a fence ins--alled but does not object to the patios. John Michaels, 505 E. Highland, stated he supports a fence but did not realize there would be this much encroachment. Barry Tabus, 507 E. Highland, supports a fence but feels they shouldn't suffer with the encroachment. Michael Nelson, 409 E. Highland, stated he supports the fence for privacy and safety. Michael Losacco of Blue Jay building Corporation stated that he wanted to put in a fence in the beginning but the residents wanted landscaping. He stated that the shrubs are not mature yet. He also stated that the neighbors garages are 7' to 8' from the property line. Mr. Losacco stated that he will put in a fence, but would like to decrease the amount of landscaping required. Mr. Michaels stated he feels the fence should be mandatory and would also like landscaping. Mr. Cassidy asked the petitioner if an 81 x 12' patio is okay with the petitioner. Mr. Losacco stated that 8' x 12' is okay with him noting that there will be a total of 18 patios. The Board then generally discussed the Case and stated that they would like a modified landscaping plan approved by Staff with a 6' fence installed on the north side of the property and a maximum 81 x 12' patio size. The petitioner agreed. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for an amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance # 4187 per Secticn 14.1401 to allow 8' x 12' patios on certain dwelling units to encroach up to 8' with maximum patio size E ZBA-65-SU-91 September 26, 1991 Page 3 of 3 of 8' x 12' conditioned on submission of a modified landscaping plan approved by Staff and a 6' fence installed along the north side of the property. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This Case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1991 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO SPECIAL USE ORDINANCE #4257 On December 4, 1990, the Village Board approved a Special Use Ordinance for Tom and Jane Conrad to 1002 Prospect Manor Drive. The Ordinance authorized construction of an oversized garage. A Special Use runs with the land and does not expire. Ordinance #4257 incorrectly included a Section stating that the Ordinance would be null and void unless construction begins in one year. This is wording that is typically found in variation ordinances, but this wording should not be in a Special Use ordinance. The Conrads have asked that Ordinance #4257 be amended to delete this incorrect wording. Village Attorney Buzz Hill has reviewed this and states that it is appropriate for the Village Board to amend the ordinance to remove the incorrect language. DMC:hg CAF/ 10/10/91 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4257 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1002 NORTH PROSPECT MANOR WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did adopted Ordinance No. 4257 entitled "An Ordinance Granting A Special Use for Property Commonly Known as 1002 Prospect Manor" at their regular meeting held December 4, 1990; and WHEREAS, SECTION FOUR of Ordinance No. 4257 provides that permits must be obtained within one year from the date the Ordinance was adopted, which one year effective period applies to variations but does not apply to a Special Use; and WHEREAS, it would be appropriate to amend Ordinance No. 4257 by deleting SECTION FOUR in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That SECTION FOUR of Ordinance No. 4257 is hereby amended by deleting SECTION FOUR in its entirety. SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after is passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER �� DATE: SEPTEMBER 26, 1991. SUBJECT: TRANSFER OF FUNDS - C.D.B.G. PROGRAM For Fiscal Year 1991, Planning and Zoning allocated $124,000 for the Single Family housing Rehabilitation Program. I estimate that approximately $120,000 of that amount is available for actual housing rehabilitation construction work. To date, staff has obligated or paid $93,663 in housing rehabilitation work, leaving a balance of $26,337.00. I'm expecting eligible applications for further housing rehabilitation work and believe that these will use up the remaining funds. I would suggest that we prepare a transfer resolution immediately to add funds to this account. The transfers could come from the following activities and the following amounts: Train Station Handicap Accessibility $ 1,692.00 Senior Center Asbestos Project 6,924.00 Unprogrammed funds 6,659.00 Public Buildings Accessibility 8,000.00 TOTAL: $23,275.00 This transfer would close out the first three activities and leave a balance in the fourth of $30,000 which may be used for the Mount Prospect Historical Museum project. I would like to transfer these funds as soon as possible. Please see me about this so we can get the transfer prepared. MES:hg RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION PROVIDING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has entered its fifteenth year as an entitlement community under the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, in the past fourteen years the Village has used these funds to implement various projects that address the community development and housing needs of its low- and moderate -income and elderly residents, to reduce and prevent the occurrence of deterioration in the central area of the Village, to increase accessibility for the handicapped, plan neighborhood street improvements, and to address other community needs in conformance with the objectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program; and WHEREAS, there is a need for additional funds for the Housing Rehabilitation Program, which is part of the Village's Community Development Block Grant effort to assist low income households in making repairs to their residences; and WHEREAS, the Train Station Handicapped Accessibility Project and the Senior Center Asbestos Project are completed and the balance of funds are no longer needed for these activities, the Public Buildings Accessibility Project has adequate funds to address future needs, and Unprogrammed Funds need to be transferred into an active project in order to be utilized. WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Village have determined that a public hearing is not needed for this action. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby approve the following transfer of Community Development Block Grant funds in the following amounts for a total transfer of $23,275.00. From: Train Station Handicapped Accessibility: $ 1,692.00 From: Senior Center Asbestos Project: From. Unprogrammed Funds: From: Public Building Accessibility: $ 6,924.00 $ 6,659.00 To: Housing Rehabilitation: $23,275.00 SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorize the Village Manager to transfer said funds. SECTION THREE: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: PASSED this day of 1991. APPROVED this _day of 9 1991. FINW-1139 VILLAGE CLERK MAYOR /caf ORDINANCE NO. .ANORDINANCE TO LOWER THE 9-1-1 _SURCHARGE WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted into law the Emergency Telephone System Act (Chapter 134, Section 30.01 et seq. Illinois Revised Statutes) hereinafter called the "Act"; and WHEREAS, the Act enables municipalities to impose a surcharge on telecommunication carriers at a rate per network connection in order to implement and/or upgrade and maintain a 119-1-111 emergency telephone system; and WHEREAS, Section 45.3(8) of Chapter 134 of the Illinois Revised Statutes allows the telecommunications carrier to recover the surcharge which includes a 34 accounting charge from its subscribers resident within the corporate limits of the municipality imposing the surcharge; and WHEREAS, pursuant to ordinance No. 4016 enacted by the President and Board of Trustees Village of Mount Prospect on January 3, 1989, a referendum was held to seek approval of imposing a surcharge not to exceed $.75 per network connection to pay for a 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System; and WHEREAS, said referendum was approved in an election held April 4, 1989 and the $.75 surcharge was subsequently imposed on telecommunications network connections; and WHEREAS, sufficient revenue has been generated through the surcharge to cover the initial start-up costs of the Enhanced 9-1- 1 Telephone System; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of the Northwest Central 9-1-1 System has determined that a lower surcharge will be sufficient to cover the cost of the on-going costs of operation and maintenance of the Enhanced 9-1-1 Telephone System; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That effective January 1, 1992, the surcharge imposed on each telecommunications network connection inside the corporate limits -of the Village of Mount Prospect shall be reduced from $.75 to $.30 per month per connection. SECTION TWO: That each telecommunication carrier operating within the corporate limits of the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby directed to modify the surcharge assessment on each telecommunications network connection to conform to SECTION ONE above. SECTION THREE: That all other provisions of ordinance No. 4016 relating to the establishment of an Emergency Telephone System Reduce 9-1-1 Page 2 of 2 shall remain in full force and effect. SECTION -FOUR: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after is passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Pt - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1991 SUBJECT: BROADACRE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT Attached please find a Consulting Services Agreement from Broadacre Management for your consideration. Broadacre has submitted this to provide for their initial services, such as, negotiation with property owners, review of appraisals and initial planning and architectural consultation. The Agreement is necessary for Broadacre to be able to proceed in the project planning= phase of our downtown redevelopment. Please note that one important feature of the Agreement is that Broadacre will be deferring one-half of the total professional fee until such time Broadacre proceeds with a project. Broadacre believes this helps demonstrate their commitment to the redevelopment project, and that they are intent on development rather than consulting. Staff recommends approval of the Consulting Services Agreement. DMC:hg Attachment A CONSULTING SERVICES AGREEMENT FOR THE THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Submitted by BROADACRE CONSULTING COMPANY September 16, 1991 Consulting Serv,ices Between The Village f Mount Prospect and Broadacre Consultina September 16, I991 Broadacce Consulting Company will provide consulting services to the Village of Mt. Prospect for the future redevelopment of the downtown center. These serviceo, described uelow, are to be considered a component of an overall Development Agreement to be established at a later date' Consulting services provided will lead to the future development of a master plan, which may be implemented in stages. f Consulting Services The services provided by oroadaore Consulting Company shall include, but shall not be limited to, the following: A. General consultation. B. Planning and architectural consultation. C. Evaluation and development of village plans, goals, and strategies including: 1. Land appraisals and acquisitions. z. Ordinances. 3. Traffic, street and open space plans. D. Assistance in negotiations with property owners. E. Development of relocation schemes. F. Evaluation and/or origination of any interim development project prior to the completion of the Development Agreement. -2~ C ion Brc'adacre Consulting Company will be compensated as follows (rates quoted are BCvs rates for not-for-profit agencies and governmental units): "Principals - ¢150.00 per hour. Associates - $75.00 per hour. Staff and clerical support are included in quoted billing rates. Consulting hours are billed portal to portal. Reimbursable expenses, including out -of pocket costs' are billed without mark-up. Invoices will be submitted monthly. "(Principals include: Robert Mears. Bert Meeza, Fidel Lopez and Francis Freeman). In recognition that a working partnership is being established wi`:h the Village of Mt. Prospect, Bzoadacze Consulting Company proposes to defer one-half of its total professional tee billing, with the balance to be payable as an additional developer's fee when a project involving both Broadacre and the viilage proceeds. Should the Village of Mt- Prospect terminate Bzoadacre as either coosuItaut or developer, any remaining balance will become due anti payable to Broadacre by the Village. In any development which is actually financed, the Village will be eligible for reimbursement for the payments made to aroadacre for costs pertaining to that development. Such reimbursement is part of the project origination expenses. It is understood that Broadaore has already provided consulting services and will be compensated retroactively upon presentation of invoices. The commencement of Consulting Services, for purposes of determining billable hours, started no April lI| 1991 with the consultations with Northwest Electric Company's expansion plans. SobI i � paoy By; q1) � /�,-/ / te / ' Accepted: Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois By: CAF/ 10/10/91 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND BROADACRE ...,,DEVELOP ENT COMPANY WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has established a Tax Increment Financing District for the purpose of redeveloping the downtown district; and WHEREAS, in order to prepare the best plan for the redevelopment area, the Village of Mount Prospect has determined that it would be in the best interest of the Village to enter into an Agreement with Broadacre Development Company; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees do hereby authorize execution of an Agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and Broadacre Development Company for the purpose of development a plan for the Downtown Redevelopment District of the Village of Mount Prospect, a copy of which Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this - day of Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk 1991. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager K - FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning DATE: October 9, 1991 SUBJECT: Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) Attached you will find a revised copy of the Village of Mount Prospect's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS). The CHAS is the Village of Mount Prospect's Affordable Housing Plan for the next five years and is a federal requirement of Community Development Block Grant recipients. As a result of the information we received during the Committee Of The Whole meeting on October 4, staff has made the following adjustments to the draft you received. First, on page 4, paragraph 5, the starting price for condominium and townhome ownership was revised from $90,000 to $50,000. Secondly, on page 5, paragraph 1, the monthly mortgage payment information and percentages of housing cost to income were all adjusted for the change in condominium and townhome cost noted above. The third and last change is on page 2, the last paragraph and the last sentence, indicating Village Board approval on October 15, 1991. Your original copy identified approval for October 4, 1991. Staff has also deleted from page 4, paragraph 4, the sentence regarding the selling price of single-family homes. Finally, a sentence was added on page 7, paragraph 1, identifying the property tax rate for apartments. I would encourage you to call me if you have any questions regarding the Village's CHAS. This item will be on the Village Board agenda for October 15, 1991. MES:cl CHAS DEVELOPMENT AND C01ZEN PARTICIPATION PROCESS Mount Prospect began it's Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy (CHAS) with a review of the interim rule published in the Federal Register on February 4, 1991. In June of 1991, staff began assembling CHAS information from three basic sources: The United States Census of 1980 and 1990, Mount Prospect's Three -Year Housing Assistance Plan of 1988, and housing related data from experts in the field, On July 10, 1991, the Village of Mount Prospect Plan Commission held a CHAS hearing in order to receive expert testimony and comments from the public regarding the need for affordable housing in the Village. As a result of this public hearing process, information was gathered from the Alliance For The Mentally III Barrington Area League of Women Voters CEDA Northwest Centennial Apartments (Elderly Subsidized Housing) Cook County Health Department Countryside Bank Evangelical Health Systems First Chicago Bank ofMount Prospect First National Bank ofMount Prospect G| kik for the sd| Disabled) Housing Authority of the County of Cook Leadership Council for Metropolitan Open Communities League of Women Voters of Arlington Heights/Mount Prospect/Buffalo Grove Mid -City National Bank Mount Prospect Human Services Division Northeastern Illinois Plan Commission Northwest Community no. Northwest Housing Partnership Inc. Public Action to Deliver Services (PADS) Resource Center for the Elderly State of Illinois Suburban AreAging . TamnenHome Federal Savings 8Loan Assn. On August 9, 1991, Village staff sent a survey form to affordable housing related organizations in Mount Prospect and Cook County. The form asked each organization to identify what housing services they provide and what if any federal housing assistance programs they would be applying for in the next five years. This information was also incorporated into the attached Village of Mount Prospect Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy. A second public hearing was held on September 18, 1991 before the Plan Commission to receive public comments and Commission recommendation for the final Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy document. The Village Board then gave final approval of the document during their October 15, 1991 meeting. In the past ten year Mount Prospect has experienced a small but significant change in it's racial and ethnic make-up. For instance, the number of Asian and Pacific Islander residents grew to 3,417, up from 1,490 in 1980. The Black residential population grew from 331 to 606 during the same ten year period. The increase in the Hispanic Origin population went from 1,225 in 1980 to 3,411 in 1990. The American Indian population also rose over the same time period from 52 to 73. See the attached Minority / Racial / Low Income Map for the census tract areas of concentrations of minorities. General ina Needs and Inventm : The number of housing units in Mount Prospect increased by 1,436 over the past ten years, from 19,513 in 1980 to 20,949 in 1990 according to the Census Bureau. Almost all of that increase was in owner occupied homes. In 1980 there were 12,706 owner -occupied units. That number rose to 14,009 by 1990. Over the same time period, rental units increased by 209 units, from 6063 in 1980 to 6272 in 1990. At the time of the 1990 Census, the vacancy rate for homeowners was 0.8% while for rental -occupied units the rate was 5.8%. Staff's analysis of the housing market in Mount Prospect has concentrated on cost, housing conditions, overcrowding and availability. The biggest housing problem in Mount Prospect centers on cost. This will be discussed in the following paragraphs. In general, most housing units are in good condition and should remain so at least for the near future. Mount Prospect property values are fairly high and staff believes it does not make economic sense for property owners to allow these expensive assets to deteriorate. The most serious housing conditions are in the south end of the Village in apartment complexes on Algonquin and Busse Roads. We would note that overcrowding is rarely a problem. Some isolated cases exist, primarily in rental units. Rental units are readily available, as has been verified by information contained in the preceding paragraph. The cost of owning a single family detached home in Mount Prospect poses a major problem for a low income or very low income household. With very little buildable land remaining and a low vacancy rate, there appears little chance that single family detached home prices will drop. Condominium and townhome ownership seems more likely for low income and very low income households. Staff estimates these units may start around $50,000.00. Such housing represents a good opportunity for first time homeowners to live in Mount Prospect. The Village encourages home ownership in such areas and throughout the Village as a source of good housing and as a source of accumulating equity for finding future housing. The market demand for rental units in Mount Prospect over the past ten years certainly was not as strong as that for single family homes. This appears due partly because of high contract rents and a slightly higher than normal vacancy rate as noted above. The 1990 Census reports that the median contract rent in 1990 was $564.00, with almost three quarters of the monthly rents ranging between $500.00 and $749.00. Homeownership and renting in Mount Prospect pose serious housing affordability concerns and cost burdens for low income, very low income and moderate income households. For instance, a low income household of two with an income of $27,750.00 (HUD Section 8 Income Limit, 80% of median), the household would have to pay approximately $441.00 a month mortgage payment to purchase a 2 bedroom townhome or condominium in Mount Prospect. If one assumes an additional $200.00 in utility costs, the household's total monthly housing cost would be $641.00 or $7,692.00 a year. This calculated housing cost does not include the normal expenses of property insurance, principal mortage insurance, taxes or property owner association fees. With a take home pay of two thirds of the gross pay, the households net annual income would be $18,315.00. For this household to purchase this home, the owners would pay 35% of their net take home pay for the above noted housing costs or 23% of their gross income. Very low income home buyers with an annual gross income of $13,875.00 ( 500/0 of median income) would utilize 46% of their income for the above noted housing cost. A moderate income households with a yearly gross income of $32,950.00 (95% of median income) would utilize 29% of their net annual pay and 19% of their gross annual income for all housing expenses. Renting, for some, would be a little easier. With a median rent of $564.00 a month and utility bills of $200.00 a month, the median total monthly rental housing cost would be $764.00 or $8952.00 annually. For the low income household of two with a combined income of $27,750.00, the household would pay 32% of their gross income and 49% of their net take home pay for housing. The same household with a very low income would utilize 51% of their gross pay and 78% of their net for the same rental housing. A moderate income household of two at the 95% level of the median income would use 27% of their gross pay and 41% of their net for the same housing. There are a number of federally assisted rental programs currently operating in Mount Prospect. The Housing Authority of Cook County reports there are presently 24 families and 17 elderly, disabled, or handicapped residents benefiting from the Authority's Section 8 Program. Centennial Apartments and Huntington Apartments are providing 412 units of senior subsidized housing. Both are currently full with a two to two and a half- year waiting list. Federal Preference Rules allow for individuals living in substandard housing, those involuntarily displaced, and persons paying more than 50% of their income for rent and utilities to receive priority in access to subsidized housing. At the current time, Centennial Apartments is only receiving applications from the preference list. Mount Prospect's Three Year HAP in 1988 showed that the number one housing need at that time was new elderly housing with rental subsidies for our lower income senior citizens. This need remains and was confirmed by testimony from Centennial Apartments and Evangelical Health Systems during the CHAS public hearing on July 10, 1991. Other testimony from the Housing Authority of Cook County, Suburban Area Agency on Aging and the Resource Center for the Elderly confirmed a need for senior shared housing and rental assistance programs for the very low income. Mount $100.00 which represents about 10% of the total property tax rate of $9.12 per $100.00. This rate is comparable to other communities in the area. Local school districts receive approximately 60% of these taxes. Mount Prospect is located in Cook County, the only county in Illinois to tax residential property at a lower rate than businesses and industries. Residential owner occupied property here is taxed at 16% of market value. Apartments are taxed at 22%. The commercial and industrial rates are at 38% and 36%. All other counties in the state have single tax rate of 331% for properties. This does not mean that actual residential taxes are lower, for the current property tax multiplier is 1.9946 per $100.00. Surrounding counties have multipliers ofjust over 1.O. Village land use and zoning ordinances allow residential units tobeoccupied by up to five unrelated individuals or up to eight unrelated individuals in group homes. Group homes are permitted by ordinance and need nospecial use approval. The Zoning Code does not permitmultiple uses onasingle property. Thus, housing units are not permitted above businesses nor are "granny" units allowed on residential lots. The minimum lot width for detached residential lots isG5'and 75'oncorner lots. The Village Development Code notes that all residential streets bebuilt 81' back to back ofcurb and that storm water detention facilities bebuilt onall residential developments exceeding 2acres insize and/or receiving olot coverage variation. The building code reflects both national professional construction standards as well asstate and federal government requirements. Some ofthese dodrive upthe cost of housing. For instance, federal handicap accessibility standards now state that new housing must be convertible for handicap use. Thus, plumbing must be installed at standard heights as well as adjustable for lower handicap use. Halls and restroom must be wide enough to be able to be converted to meet handicap standards and wheelchair use. Safety related code items also negatively effect housing affordability. For instance, more inexpensive pipe material, like plastic, is not permitted because of the toxic smoke hazard it may present during a fire and the materials potential health problems when used for drinking water. Village fire codes require residential buildings over 5000 S.F. to have fire sprinkling systems. Mandatory fire wall construction for multiple unit construction also increases construction cost. The electrical code prohibits the use of Romex and other more inexpensive wiring and notes that all wiring be placed in conduit. Developer fees are inthe form of permitfees, development fees and cost related to letters of credit. Permit fees cover the cost of structural, p|umnbing, and electrical inspections aawell as tappingontosewer and water utilities. Development fees include a one time donation to the Village to cover immediate and future needs of the residents ofthe development. Letters mfCredit are used toensure that approved developments are constructed according toCode and approved plans. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE NEW FIVE-YEAR COMPREHENSIVE AFFORDABILITY STRATEGY FOR YEARS 1992 THRU 1996 WHEREAS, the Cranston -Gonzales National Affordable Housing Act of 1990 requires that all Community Development Block Grant receipients adopt a local Housing Affordability Strategy Plan; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a reciepient of Community Development Block Grant funds; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has prepared a Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy which identifies the housing needs of low and moderate -income residents as well as those of special groups; and WHEREAS, the Plan Commission conducted public hearings on July 10, 1991 and September 18, 1991 and has recommended the approval of the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees has determined that the Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy provides the Village with a useful housing plan which will help insure the availability of affordable housing in Mount Prospect: NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby approves the attached Comprehensive Housing Affordability Strategy and authorizes the Village Manager to forward said strategy to the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development in accordance with federal guidelines. ;E�."1'`IO_t°d TWO: This Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner approved by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of , 1991. MAEVZORM ATTEST: VILLAGE CLERK