HomeMy WebLinkAbout4316_001ILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next ordinance No. 4342
ALL
Next Resolution No. 33-91
-NIT,
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center September 3, 1991 1fff1ffffff1JJWNNNNNMWMW
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. N.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 September 3, 199
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Clowes Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Wilks
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, August 20, 1991
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, ING, August 27, 1991
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: National Adult Day Care Week,
September 16-20
B. PROCLAMATION: Chamber of Commerce Week,
September 22-28
C. Notification of potential new owners of Alvee's
Liquor Store, 1141 Mount Prospect Plaza, to
qualify to operate with a Class "C" liquor
license upon the request for cancellation of
license by the existing owner, and proof that
the applicant is the new owner of the business.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 37-V-91, 205 South Audrey Lane
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 205 S. AUDREY LANE
This ordinance grants a variation to allow
a 61 911 sideyard setback, rather than the
required 9.251, and a variation to allow a 271
front yard setback rather than 301 to allow
construction of an addition to an existing garage.
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit A)
B. ZBA 42-V-91, 748 Whitegate court
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 748 WHITEGATE COURT
This ordinance would allow a total lot coverage
of 47.3% rather than the 45% allowed. (Exhibit B)
C. ZBA 47-V-91, 600 Carboy Road
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 600 CARBOY ROAD
This ordinance grants a variation to allow a
10 foot rear yard to accommodate a building
addition, rather than the required 201. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit C)
D. ZBA 48 -SU -91, 1840-1894 S. Elmhurst Road
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 4156 GOVERNING PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 1840 - 1894 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
This Ordinance amends ordinance No. 4156 to
allow limited retail uses in the Rogers
Industrial Park. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote (Exhibit D)
of 5-0.
E. ZBA 49-Z-91, 1910 South Busse Road, Cook County
School Bus Company
1. A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING A SETTLEMENT
WITH COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC. IN CASE
No. 87 CH 3393 (Exhibit E)
2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance re -zones the subject property
from(Residential Development).
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit. F
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 50-V-91, 1706 Liberty Court
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a zero foot separation, rather than the required
101, between a pool deck and house. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 7-0.
B. ZBA 53-V-91, 1109 Brentwood Lane
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
reconstruction of a detached garage 31,411 from the
side lot line; Village Code requires a 51' setback.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 7-0.
C. ZBA 54-V-91, 6 South Hi-Lusi Avenue
The Petitioner requests a variation to allow a
driveway width of 28' at the widest point, rather
than the 211 permitted by the Code. The Zoning
Board recommends granting this request by a vote
of 7-0.
D. ZBA 56-V-91, 2020 East Euclid Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a front yard setback of 3.75-* rather than 3011 as
required by Code in order to install two overhead
gas pump canopies. The Zoning Board of Appeals
voted 7-0 to grant this request.
E. ZBA 59 -SU -91, 1010 Mount Prospect Plaza
The Petitioner is requesting a Special use permit
to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite
antenna. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 7-0 to
grant this request.
F. Accept private improvements installed in
conjunction with the new Aldi's building,
730 East Rand Road.
G. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
CHAPTER 16 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) RELATIVE
To DETENTION REQUIREMENTS (Exhibit G)
H. Extension of lease agreement with 2"
Commonwealth Edison for an additional five,
years, ending September 30, 1996
I. Recommendations from Public Place Naming committee
regarding the new Fire and Police Station
X. VILLAGE KANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. Thermoplastic Marking Program: Mark -It
Stripings Corp.
2. 1991 Road Reconstruction Program Soils
Investigation: Soils & Materials Consultants,
Inc.
3. High Service Pump Replacement, Phase 4: Greeley
and Hansen Engineers
B. Status Report
Xi. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - PERSONNEL
Ff WWVI• • lEllPK'v 9
n
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR. MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AUGUST 20, 1991
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Clowes. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of MINUTES
the Mayor and Board of Trustees held August 6, 1991.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved APPROVE BILLS
to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 957,444
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
7,811
Community Development Block Grant Fund
58,817
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
11,542
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
419,847
Parking System Revenue Fund
4,029
Risk Management Fund
82,642
Vehicle Replacement Fund
167,737
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep. Fund
173,004
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1985
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1991
3,023
Fire & Police Building Const.
13,468
Flood Control Revenue Fund
1,857
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
-
Flexcomp Trust Fund
4,800
Escrow Deposit Fund
15,598
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
2,167
$1,923,786
Upon ro1.1 call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ACCEPT
to accept the financial report dated July 31, 1991, FINANCIAL
subject to audit. REPORT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
coNMMICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
DOG BITE POLICY Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane, stated that
following a recent experience with a person having been
bitten by a dog he became aware that the policy dealing
with this problem had been changed. He asked that the
Village Board give consideration to returning to the
policy of impounding the animal and advising the victim
of the outcome of the veterinary examination. Mr.
Hendricks stated that he had asked the Village Manager
for information on this matter and that he did not
receive a response to his inquiry.
NAMING FIRE & Fran%rpiasne�, 2103 Jody Court, stated that he did not
POLICE BLDG. sup n min
'po --n m i�g public buildings or places after elected
officials.
LEASH LAW Don Harmon, 16 North William, requested that
regulations be established limiting, the length of a dog
leash. Mayor Farley stated that the existing law
provides that a leash no longer than a' is permitted.
MAYOR'S REPORT
AMEND. CH. 13 An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
DELETE CLASS 11W11 amend Chapter 13 by reducing the number of Class "W"
SIZZLER licenses by one, issued to Sizzler Restaurant, 110 East
Rand Road. It was noted that this business has closed.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4336 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4336
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MEDICAL WASTE mayor Farley asked that the Ordinance amending Chapter
19, relative to regulating disposalof medical waste,
which appears latsr on this agenda, be withdrawn. It
was notedthat pending legislatido on the State level
would ef f ect the contents of the proposed Ordinance and
it is recommended that the Village wait for the new
State regulations before instituting local regulations -
There was discussion among the Board members as to
disposal of other hazardous household waste, such as
paint and solvents and the possibility of the Village
governing disposal of such items. It was noted that
the Village had applied for a grant from the EPA, which
had been declined for 1991, however it is possible that
the Village may be considered for a grant in 1992.
Trustee Wilks asked that this matter be discussed in
depth at a future Committee of the Whole meeting. She
also suggested that the Village might want to consider
a paint exchange day, which has proved successful in
other communities.
Page 2 - August 20, 1991
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 30-V-91, 407 South Meier Road
ZBA 30-V-91
An ordinance was presented for first reading
407 MEIER
that would grant a variation to allow a 2.331
ROAD
side yard, rather than the required 6.51, in
order to accommodate an existing patio/basketball
court. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Busse,
seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved for
ORD.NO. 4337
passage of Ordinance No. 4337
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 407 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 37-V-91, 205 South Audrey Lane
ZBA 37-V-91
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
205 AUDREY
would grant a variation to allow a 61 911 side yard
LANE
setback to permit an addition to an existing
one -car garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
This ordinance will be presented for second reading
at the next regular meeting on September 3rd.
ZBA 39-V-91, 1050 South Linnemann Road ZBA 39-V-91
An ordinance was presented for first reading that 1050 LINNEMANN
would permit a circular driveway which would result ROAD
in a front yard lot coverage of 48%, rather than
the permitted 35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting the requests in ZBA 39-V-91
by a vote of 7-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Busse,
seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved ORD.NO. 4338
for passage of ordinance No. 4338
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1050 SOUTH LINNEMAN ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion'carried.
Page 3 - August 20, 1991
ZBA 40 -SU -91
ZBA 40-sU-91 and ZBA 41-V-91, 625 }Meier Road
ZBA 41-V-91
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
625 MEIER ROAD
would grant a Special Use Permit to allow a 3 -car
garage and e variation to allow a 34 foot wide
driveway, rather than the permitted 21 feet.. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by'a vote 7-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran,,,
seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an 'Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse,iClowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4339
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4339
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND
VARIATION FOR PROPERTYLOCATED AT
625 SOUTH'MEIER ROAD
Upon roll call': Ayes: Busse,: Cloves, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 42-V-91
ZBA 42-V-91, 748 Whitegate Court
748 WHITEGATE
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that.would
COURT
allow a total lot coverage of 47.3%, rather than the
45% allowed by Code, to permit a 21 foot wide driveway.
The variation being granted is a result of a revision
of the original request made by the Petitioner.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at
the next regular meeting of the Village Board on
September 3rd.
ZBA 43-V-91
1818 AZTEC LANE
ZBA 43-V-91, 1818 Aztec Lane
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would'
grant a'variation to allow construction of a deck which
will result in a 118"a side yard at the narrowest point,
rather than the required 10 The Zoningof
y a vote;
Appeals recommended granting this requestgbBoard to
of 4-1.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Busse,,
seconded by Trustee' Wilks, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Cloves, Corcoran, Walks
Nays. Nome
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4340
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4340
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1818 AZTEC LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse:, Cloves, Corcoran, Wilke
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 - August 20, 1991
ZBA 44-V-91, 503 South Elmhurst Road
ZBA 44-V-91
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
503 S.ELMHURST
would allow a circular drive and would allow a front
ROAD
yard coverage of 53.80, rather than the 35% allowed.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
this request by a vote of 2-3.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Wilks,
seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
ZBA 48 -SU -91
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
1840 - 1894
Nays: None
S. ELMHURST RD
Motion carried.
ROGERS
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
ORD.NO. 4341
for passage of Ordinance No. 4341
PARK
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 503 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 47-V-91, 600 Carboy Road ZBA 47-V-91
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 600 CARBOY
would allow a 10 foot rear yard to accommodate a ROAD
building addition, rather than the required 201.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Wilks
Nays: Corcoran, Farley
Motion failed.
It was noted that local regulations require 4 votes
to pass a motion. It was also noted that the
subject property is commercial and the Trustees
voting against waiving the rules prefer that
Ordinances pertaining to commercial properties
stand for two readings.
This Ordinance will be presented September 3rd for
second reading.
ZBA 48 -SU -91, 1840-1894 South Elmhurst Road
ZBA 48 -SU -91
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
1840 - 1894
would amend a Special Use granted in Ordinance
S. ELMHURST RD
No. 4156 to allow limited retail uses in the
ROGERS
Rogers Corporate Park. The Zoning Board of
INDUSTRIAL
Appeals recommended granting this request by a
PARK
vote of 5-0.
This Ordinance will be presented September 3rd
for second reading.
Page 5 - August 20, 1991
ZBA 49-Z-91 ZBA 49-Z-91, 1910 S. Busse Rd., Cook County School Bus
1910 S.BUSSE RD An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
re -zone this property from R -X to R-4. It was noted
that the R -X zoning was assigned to this property qm
annexation. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 5-0.
This ordinance will be presented September 3rd for
second reading.
AMEND CH. 19 It was noted that the Ordinance amending Chapter 19
MEDICAL WASTE relative to disposal of medical waste was withdrawn
earlier in the meeting.
AMEND CH. 11 An ordinance was presented for second reading that
NEWSPAPER VENDING would amend Chapter 11 of the Village Code by
MACHINES establishing regulations governing the placement of
newspaper vending machines on public property.
Members of the Board discussed the fact that they did
not see a need for this ordinance. Trustee Clowes
stated that he had contacted the newspaper companies
regarding the fact that there were complaints about
muddy areas in front of certain vending machines and
reported that these companies were unaware of any
complaints.
Trustee Corcoran presented a motion to pass this
Ordinance, however, due to the lack of a second to this
motion failed.
NEW BUSINESS
None.
Page 6 - August 20, 1991
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BID RESULTS:
Village Manager, John Fulton Dixon, p resented bid
results for various items.
STORM SEWER
The following bids were received for the construction
IMPROVEMENT
of Phase I of the Storm Sewer Improvement program:
PROGRAM: PHASE
I
Amoun
Bidder
Szabo Paving & Construction Co.
$646,380.75
National Sewer & Water, Inc.
671,883.00
League Sewer Construction
712,463.00
DiPaolo Company
729,200-00
Kovilic Construction Co.
750,452,00
Lenny Hoffman Excavating, Inc.
780,259.25
SZABO PAVING
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
of the administration
.concur with the recommendation
and accept the low qualified bid
submitted by Szabo
Paving and Construction Company
in the amount of
$646,380.75 for the construction
of Phase I of the
storm sewer improvement program.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PHASE I
STORM SEWER
The following proposals were
received for the
IMPROVEMENT
engineering services in connection
with Phase I of the,
ENGINEERING
construction project:
Page 6 - August 20, 1991
Donohue & Associates $29,680
R.J.N. Environmental 31,954
The bids were presented on the following tabulations:
Total hours Average
Quoted Hourly Rate
Donohue & Associates 580 $51.17
RJN Environmental 660 48.42
It was the recommendation of the administration to accept
the proposal submitted by R.J.N. Environmental due to the
fact that staff feels Donohue has underestimated the total
amount of time needed for engineering services on this
project and the low bidder would, as in the past, probably
bill the Village for additional time.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to concur
with the recommendation of the administration and accept
the proposal submitted by R.J.N. Environmental for
engineering services for Phase I of the storm sewer
improvement project in the amount of $31,954.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Wilks, Farley
Nays: Clowes, Corcoran
Motion failed.
It was noted that local regulations require 4 votes in
order for a motion to carry.
Trustees Clowes, and Corcoran stated that they prefer
accepting the low bid and did not favor a policy of
disregarding the lowest bid without valid reasons.
Trustee Busse stated that inasmuch as two Trustees
were absent and the fact that this project is on a 44
timetable, he would suggest a Special Meeti
Village Board be held prior to the August Committee
of the Whole meeting in order to present this matter
and possibly reconsider the action taken.
This matter will be presented August 27th at a
Special Meeting called for the sole purpose of
discussing the engineering services proposals for
Phase I of the storm sewer improvement project.
The following bids were received for shade trees: SHADE TREES
Diameter - 1-1/211
Bidder
Wood Landscaping
Arthur Weiler
Berthold
St. Aubin
Green Horizon
Klehm Nursery
Land of Lincoln
* Incomplete bid
$3,077.50
4,900.00
5,125.00
5,143.00
9,809.00
2,535.00*
2,235.00*
Page 7 - August 20, 1991
2-1/2" _ Specific species
d;,rAmount
Klehm Nursery
$49,186.00
Berthold
48,260.00
Wood Landscaping
49,233.50
Land of Lincoln
48,035.40
Williamson
11,000.00*
Arthur Weiler
30,175.00*
Green Horizon
68,420.00
St. Aubin
23,877.50
2-1/2" _ Specific species
Bidd
Klehm Nursery
$35,820.00
Berthold
39,175.00
wood Landscaping
41,521.00
Land of Lincoln
36,228.00
Williamson
16,250.00*
Arthur Weiler
37,770.00*
Green Horizon
57,746.65
St. Aubin
44,314.50
WOOD, KLEHM Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
BERTHOLD concur with the recommendation of the administration
and authorize the purchase of 1-1/211 diameter trees
from Wood 'Landscaping, and to splitthe purchase of 2-
1/211 trees, based on particular species, between Klehm
Nursery, and Berthold for a total expenditure not to
exceed $93,500-00
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
WATER METERS it was noted that bids were received for the
installation, replacement and/or testing of water
meters from only one bidder, HBK water Meter Service
Company. The total cost depends on the demand for
service and condition of the equipment.
HBK WATER METER Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
SERVICE CO. concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the bid submitted by HBK Water Meter Service
for the '-,.,stallation, replacement and/or testing of
water meters at a cost not to exceed $30,000.
Uponroll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilke
Mays: None
Motion carried.
SIDEWALK: The following bids were received for a public sidewalk
NORTHWEST HWY along the north side of Northwest Highway between Maple
MAPLE - SCHOOL and School Streets.
Bidder Am2mt
Unison construction
$15,465.00
Trialta Construction
15,861.00
J. R. & v. Construction
16,681.00
Schroeder & Schroeder
23,694.50
A & R construction
24,809.95
Alliance Contractors
26,957.50
Globe Construction
33,285.00
Engineers Estimate
22,621.00
Page 8 - August 20,
1991
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
UNISON
to concur with the recommendation of the
CONST.
administration and accept the low bid submitted
by Unison Construction in the amount of $15,465.00
for the installation of a public sidewalk on the
north side of Northwest Highway between Maple and
School Streets.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
9-1-1
Motion carried.
EMERGENCY
A request from the Village Clerk was presented to
JULY 4TH
authorize an additional $2,400 over and above the
PARADE FUNDS
$10,000 budgeted for the 1991 July 4th Parade. It
was noted that the Village has a 50/50 program for
floats and since 18 floats were rented, the cost
DAVID JEPSON
for the parade exceeded the $10,000 authorized.
ACTING MANAGER
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to authorize an additional $2,400 to cover the
costs incurred for the 1991 July 4th Parade.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following proposals were received for the 1991
HOLIDAY
December holiday season decorations:
DECORATIONS:
FOLGER FLAG
Display Sales $33,296.00
Holiday Lites & Trim 28,593.00
Folger Flag & Decorating 27,000.00
It was noted that these decorations are owned,
installed, removed and maintained by the
respective companies and will include banners
and lights appropriate with the season. It was
also noted that these decorations are separate
from those previously authorized for the 75th
Jubilee celebration.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
to accept the proposal from Folger Flag & Decorating
in an amount not to exceed $27,000 for a 3 year contract
for decorations to be installed for the winter season.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Corcoran, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Dixon informed the Board that Northwest Central
9-1-1
Dispatch had moved into their new facility and that
EMERGENCY
the Enhanced 9-1-1 System was activated on Monday,
PHONE SYSTEM
August 19th. Mr. Dixon also stated that the monthly
charge of 75 cents per telephone line to all users
in the Village will be reduced, possibly to 25 cents.
Mr. Dixon expressed his appreciation to David Jepson,
DAVID JEPSON
Finance Director, who was the Acting manager during
ACTING MANAGER
Mr. Dixon's vacation, following the resignation of
Assistant Village Manager John Burg.
Page 9 - August 20, 1991
NEW FIRE &
Trustee Busse asked for an update on the Fire and
POLICE STATION
Police facility and move to temporary quarters. Mr.
Dixon stated that all personnel and equipment are now
in their temporary locations and plans for the new
building are being finalized. Mr. Dixon also stated
that he is acting as the 'Project Manager on the
construction of the new Fire and Police Station. He
stated that it is his intention to delegate that
responsibility to a staff member.
Trustee Wilks asked that an Oversight Committee be
established in conjunction with the construction of
this facility and asked that the Committee include at
least 2 Trustees. Trustee Corcoran pointed out that
any problems and/car decisions dealing with this
building should be a joint decision involving the
entire Board.
SUPER STAR
Mr. Dixon explained that the employees had recently
COMPETITION
conducted their Superstar Competition, which was
organized by Village Engineer deft Wulaecker. The
final event will be held Saturday, August 24 at Melas
Park and trophies will be presented to the winners of
each event.
Mr. Dixon was directed to contact the newspaper
companies and ask them to remedy any problems involving
their vending machines.m
MELAS PARK��j
Trustee Clowes stated that he has been asked by the
Mount Prospect Park District' to serve on a planning
044
committee for Melas Park. He stated that he has
received requests from residents to move the July 4th
carnival from the east side of the, park to the west
side.
ADJOURN
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 9:14 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 10 - August 20, 1991
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AUGUST 27, 1991
CALL TO ORDER
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
ROLL CALL
Village Manager was asked to call roll.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Floros.
RECONSIDERATION
The reason for the special meeting was the
ENGINEERING SVCS.
reconsideration of action taken relative to
PHASE I STORM
the recommendation for construction engineering
SEWER IMPROVE.
services for Phase I storm sewer improvements.
A Motion was made by Trustee Floros, seconded by
Trustee Busse, to reconsider recommendation for
construction engineering services for Phase I
storm sewer improvements.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floros, Hoefert,
Wilks
Nays: Clowes, Corcoran
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
RJN Environmental
to grant the contract to R.J.N. Environmental
Consultants
Consultants for a cost not to exceed $31,954.
Trustee Corcoran indicated a concern over setting
precedent for future bids for projects and further
indicated that the low bidder is responsible and
one that we have trusted in the past with major
programs in the Village.
Mayor Farley indicated that there was a difference
in hours to be worked, approximately 80 hours between
the two bids, and felt that because of this, he was
comfortable with the RJN bid. The difference of
$2,200 would guarantee the work being done.
Trustee Floros indicated that acceptance of bids
other than the low bid was an acceptable practice
and that future bids would not be a sham. This
does not tell RJN that they have a blank check. It
would be anticipated that there would be other
bidders in the future.
Trustee clowes recommended that we accept the bid
of the low bidder, Donohue and Associates.
Trustee Wilks indicated that RJN has spent extensive
extra hours on projects in the past with no additional
fees or expenditures requested from the Village and
that Donohue has charged for extra work in the past and
because of this, she recommended the RJN bid.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Florosf Hoefert,
Wilks
Nays: Clowes, Corcoran
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 7:55 p.m.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
John Fulton Dixon
Village Manager
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
August 29, 1991
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
8/16/91 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
8/15191
8129191
List of Bills
Entry 8129191
general & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 970,716
$ 696,324
$535,428
$ 1,131,612
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
810,337
18,125
124
828,338
Community Development Block Grant Fund
2,966
14,000
16,374
592
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
713
13,612
11,418
2,907
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
2,744,318
269,714
80,498
2,933,534
Parking System Revenue
117,675
19,141
1,371
135,445
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,051,976
180,445
95,270
1,137,151
Vehicle Replacement Fund
389,823
139,688
30,264
499,247
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
9,673
20,652
16,565
13,760
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
128,475
4,750
5,000
128,225
495,981
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1991
487,450
8,531
-
.
6,501,402
Police & Fire Building Construction
6,426,074
96,383
21,055
2,755,051
Flood Control Revenue Fund
2,781,285
105
26,339
Debt Service Fund
863,481
108,741
-
972,222
Trust -& Aeney Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
2,785
1,364,721
3,599
38,186
-
9,179
6,384
1,393,728
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
16,100,796
124,127
40,799
16,184,124
Firemen's Pension Fund
18,136,555
85,425
42,206
.18,179,774
Benefit Trust Funds
246.924
-
246.924
$52,636,743
$1,841,548
$931,890
$53,546,401
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AABY BUILDERS
ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC.
ELBERT RINGER
ALL AMERICAN ROOFING
AMC WOODWORKS
ARROW GARAGES
BADGER METER INC
BEN'S PLUMBING
BISHOP PLUMBING COMPANY
JOHN CAGLE SEWER
RUTH E. CAHILL
V.J. CENTRACCHIO & SON INC.
CAMILLE CHMELA
CLAUSS FUELS, INC.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
DE MUTH INC.
DIGANGI MECHANICAL
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
CYNTHIA L. ESSENBERG
EVER READY
FIRE CONTROL, INC.
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND REFUND C8630
BOND REFUND C8631
$475.00
$475.00
$950.00
TRAILER RENTAL
$200.00
TRAILER RENTAL
TRAILER RENTAL
$230.00
$230.00
$660.00
BOND REFUND C9444
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9108
BOND REFUND C9466
$100.00
$50.00
$150.00
BOND REFUND C9258
$75.00
$50.00
$75.00 f
$50.00 t,
BOND REFUND C9026
METERS
$2,755.60
$2,755.60
BOND REFUND C9162
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9439
BOND REFUND C9307
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9458
$100.00
$33.00
$200.00
$33.00
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
BOND REFUND C9449
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND DUP STICKER
PMT
$35.00
$35.00
FUEL
$9,550.36
$6,066.70
$15,617.06
FUEL
PMT P/R 8/22191
$224.25
$224.25*
REFUNDD DU LI PAYMENT
$35.00
$100.00
$35.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9508
P1R ENDING 8/22/91
$395,227.42
P1R ENDING 8122191
$1,298.47
P1R ENDING 8/22191
$497.58
P R ENDING 8/22/91
$41,148.70
$438,172.17*
$50.00
BOND REFUND 09569
$50.00
BOND REFUND C9185
$100.00
$8,750.00
$100.00
$8,750.00
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
SAVINGS BONDS P%R 8J22/91
$350.00
DUE TO FEDERAL DEP
PZR 8/22
$11,417.74
DUE TO FEDERAL DEP
P1R 8122
$98.27
DUE TO FEDERAL DEP
P/R 8122
$37.81
DUE TO FEDERAL DEF
DUE TO FEDERAL DEF
P1R 8122
P/R 8/22
$3,094.84
$953.06
$15,951.72*
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
WESLEY G. GRASER AND AUDREY J.
HAMBONE
J. HELMINSKI & SONS
R. HENRICKS
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE
JOSEPH JEZIORSKI
JAMES F. JOHNSON
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
GREGORY KOBUS
NICHOLAS J. LOGISZ
M.A. MATT -CO.
E.J. MCMAHON
ROGER MILLS
JOSEPH MISKE
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
DON MUSSAY
FUMIKO NAKANISHI
NATIONAL SIGNS INC.
TAKEO NODA
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
OLYMPIC SIGNS, INC.
P. J. HEATING
PARKS PLBG. & SEWER
KIRAN M. PATEL
PATIO ENCLOSURES
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
RICK A. POULOS CONSTRUCTION
JOSEPH PRASIL
RENEE'S HAIR STUDIO
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
25-31 SOUTH MAIN STREET
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
BOND REFUND C8846
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9365
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C8824
$100.00
$100.00
W4C AUDIT 1990
$13,519.00
$13,519.00
S PT VOL LIFE INS
$99.00
$99.00*
WATER
$4.76
SEWER
$.48
$5.24
BOND REFUND C9539
$100.00
$100.00
PMT P/R 8/22/91
$254.00
$254.00*
WATER
$9.52
SEWER$
96
$10.48
BOND REFUND C9080
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C8154
$570.00
$570.00
WATER
$13.88
SEWER
$1.36
$15.24
R/E TR TAX REBATE
$423.00
$423.00
BOND REFUND C9049
$75.00
$75.00
PPRT 6TH ALLOCATION
$436.96
$436.96*
BOND REFUND C4628
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9397
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND 1365
$100.00
$100.00
WATER
$4.76
SEWER
$.48
$5.24
AUCTION PROCEEDS 8/17/91
$191.50
$191.50*
BOND REFUND 1362
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9291
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9310
$75.00
$75.00
BOND REFUND C9642
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9216
75.00
$75.00
AUG FIRE PENSION DISB
$42,205.63
AUG POLICE PENSION DISB
$40,799.07
$83,004.70*
POST METER ADV DEPOSIT
$3,000.00
$3,000.00*
BOND REFUND C9473
$50.00
$50.00
R/E TR TAX REBATE
$524.00
$524.00
BbOND REFUND C9567
$100.00
$100.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO.
BOND REFUND C8335
$100.00
$8.00
$100.00
$8.00*
DIANE SANCHEZ
REFUND HLTH INS CONT SEPT
BOND REFUND C9534
$100.00
$100.00
FRANK SAWICKI
STOLTZNER PLUMBING
BOND REFUND C8664
$100.00
$75.00
$100.00
$75.00
TFC PLUMBING
BOND REFUND C9391
$620.00
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
BOND MONEY
BOND MONEY
$1,350.00
BOND MONEY
$200.00
BOND MONEY
$670.00
$2,840.00*
HANS TILPE
BOND REFUND C6700
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE C8630
$25.00
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE 08631
REINSPECTION FEE C9026
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9049
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9216
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9258
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9310
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9391
$25.00
$225.00
VILLAGE SEWER
BOND REFUND C9438
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9576
BOND REFUND C9615
$100.00
$300.00
VULCAN BASEMENT WATERPROOFING
BOND REFUND C9406
$100.00
$10.00
$100.00
$10.00
ANASTASIA XENTARAS
REFUND TICKET OVERPAYMENT
***TOTAL**
$596,800.16
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
GENERAL FUND
$416,294.50 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$1,396.74
$47,035.34
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,417.74 WATER & SEWER FUND
$535.39 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$13,527.00
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$8,750.00 POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$660.00
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
$5,000.00 POLICE PENSION FUND
$40,799.07
$9,178.75
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$42,205.63 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8129%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
BARBARA ANN DEBOER FOUNDATION
DONATION DEBOER MEMORY
$50.00
$14.97
$50.00*
$14.97
GEORGE A. CLOWES
T-SHIRT
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$64.97
GENERAL FUND
$64.97
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ARLINGTON HTS. PARK DISTRICT
USE OF RACQUETBALL COURTS
$84.00
$149.03
$84.00
ARNSTEIN & LEHR
JULY LEGAL FEES
JULY LEGAL FEES
$440.11
JULY LEGAL FEES
$141.95
JULY LEGAL FEES
$2 445.70
JULY LEGAL FEES
636.85
JULY LEGAL FEES
$248.76
JULY LEGAL FEES
$734.90
JULY LEGAL FEES
$3,250.00
JULY LEGAL FEES
$52.50
$21.00
$8,120.80
JULY LEGAL FEES
$9.00
$9.00
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
MAILING-DIXON
EXAM-PERSINO
$181.00
$181.00
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
REFERENCE MATERIALS
$219.69
$219.69
ICMA
OLYMPIC TROPHY AND AWARDS CO.
TROPHIES
$98.00
$193.00
$98.00
$193.00
RONALD W. PAVLOCK
IACP CONF AIRFARE
LEGAL FEES JULY
$920.00
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
LEGAL FEES JULY
$140.64
LEGAL FEES JULY
$1,971.41
LEGAL FEES JULY
$833.71
LEGAL FEES JULY
$74.00
LEGAL FEES JULY
$21.25
LEGAL FEES JULY
$55.00
GENERAL FUND $1,722.40
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%29%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
LEGAL FEES JULY
$650.00
LEGAL FEES JULY
LEGAL FEES JULY
$148.75
$67.50
$4,882.26
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EMPLOYEE PICNIC
$150.00
$.00
175
'$150.00*
$$13.00
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUSINESS MACHINES
DUES & MEALS
TYPEWRITER MICE
$13.05
$13.05
$13
UNITED
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
JULY LEGAL FEES
$1,177.00
$22.17
$1,177.00
$22.17
JEFFREY WULBECKER
RACQUETBALLS
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$15,324.97
GENERAL FUND
$15,324.97
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
NEWSLETTER
COMM ASST ZNG BD APPEALS
$315.50
$25.00
$315.50
$25.00
GLORIA BARLETTA
COMM ASST ZNG BD APPEALS
$25.00
$25.00
LARRY CULTON
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
FRANCE
EDWARD FRANCE
FALL 91 NEWSLETTER
$300.00
$300.00
R.T.
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
SUSAN MUELLER
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
REGISTER PASALIC
$295.00
$138.60
$295.00
$138.60
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
HOTEL PASALIC NATOA CONF
$266.40
$266.40
PAN PACIFIC HOTEL
CHERYL L. PASALIC
ADVANCE CONF EXPENSES
$180.00
$126.90
$180.00
$126.90
UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES
TYPEWRITER MICE
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,722.40
GENERAL FUND $1,722.40
********************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$2,893.13
$2,355.00
PAGE 6
R.T. JENKINS
JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$22.00
$22.00
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
$646.80
$646.80
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
PAPER
$917.28
$917.28
KEY DATA SYSTEMS
IBM RIBBONS
$120.31
$120.31
NCR CORPORATION
CASH REGISTER TAPE
$92.72
$92.72
POSTMASTER
VEHICLE STICKERS POSTAGE
$2,280.86
$2,280.86*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$74.75
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$97.17
$171.92
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
PICKUP & DELIVERY CHG
$50.00
$50.00
UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES
TYPEWRITER MICE
$102.60
$102.60
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
LEGAL PAGE
***TOTAL**
$3,735.69
GENERAL FUND
$3,735.69
$13.05
$13.05
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
NEWSLETTER
FALL 91 NEWSLETTER
$2,893.13
$2,355.00
$2,893.13
$2,355.00
R.T. JENKINS
JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
SUBSCRIPTION
$22.00
$22.00
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
NEWSLETTER PAPER
$646.80
$646.80
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
$31.65
$68.57
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
LEGAL PAGE
$68.57
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
LEGAL PAGE
$60.66
LEGAL PAGE
$71.21
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
LEGAL PAGE
$58.02
LEGAL PAGE
$63.30
LEGAL PAGE
$52.75
$717.37
UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES
TYPEWRITER MTCE
$13.05
$13.05
VENDOR
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
-PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$6,647.35
INVOICE AMOUNT
***TOTAL**
PAGE 7
TOTAL
$6,647.35
xxxxxxxx**x***xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*x*xxxxxxxxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*xxxxxxxxx
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
CLINICAL ASSOCIATES, S.C.
HMO ILLINOIS
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
NORTHWEST PHYSICAL THERAPY
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
POSTMASTER
THE VOSS GROUP
Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
MED CLAIMS THRU 8/20/91
$24,888.68
MED CLAIMS THRU 8/26191
MED CLAIMS THRU 8/28/91
$26,838.44
$19,541.45
$71,268.57*
SERVICES -MEL BOTH
SEPT HEALTH INSURANCE
$58.00
$7,685.09
$58.00
$7,685.09
W4C AUDIT 1990
$312.59-
$312.59
S RVICES RENDERED RILEY
$236.00
$295.00
$531.00
SERVICES RENDERED RILEY
SERVICES RENDERED OKON
$13.50
$13.50
HLTH MAGAZINE POSTAGE
$56.03
$9.90
$65.93*
HLTH MAG ADDTL POSTAGE
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$2,250.00
$2,250.00
BODY REPAIRS S26
$183.60
$183.60
***TOTAL**
$81,743.10
$81,743.10
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,txxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx*x
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTROL
$55.00
$55.00
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
TED ADAMCZYK
AETNA REPROGRAPHICS, INC.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPO GRAPHICS, INC.
SHOTGUN INSTRUCTOR COURSE
LAW ENFORCEMENT BROCHURES
PARTS
SERVICE
AUTO PARTS
BH66-JT-5422-A
SERVICES RENDERED BROCHURES
$302.50
$430.00
$112.08
$456.16
$215.44
$9.03
$180.00
$302.50
$430.00
$112.08
$456.16
$215.44
$9.03
$180.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%29/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
PEST CONTROL
$260.00
PEST CONTROL
$75.00
PEST CONTROL
$70.00
PEST CONTROL
$55.00
$570.00
CADALYST
SUBSCRIPTION
$59.00
$59.00
CENTRAL POINT SOFTWARE
COMPUTER SOFTWARE
$55.00
$55.00
CONSTRUCTION SPEC. INSTITUTE
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$170.00
$170.00
RODNEY ERB
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$175.00
$175.00
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
CERT OF OCCUPANCY FORMS
$248.00
INSPECTION REPORTS
$189.00
SIGN PERMIT FORMS
$263.00
INSPECTION APPT TAGS
$62.00
$762.00
GREGORY G. GRAHAM
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$25.33
$25.33
NELS J. JOHNSON
SERVICES RENDERED
$740.00
$740.00
NATIONAL FIRE PRCT. ASSOC.
HANDBOOK
$93.20
$93.20
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
ELEVATOR INSPECTION
$50.00
$50.00
TOPCON MIDWEST
ROLATAPE
$105.82
$105.82
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$232.13
$232.13
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$3,037.48
GENERAL FUND
$3,037.48
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
TED ADAMCZYK
AETNA REPROGRAPHICS, INC.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPO GRAPHICS, INC.
SHOTGUN INSTRUCTOR COURSE
LAW ENFORCEMENT BROCHURES
PARTS
SERVICE
AUTO PARTS
BH66-JT-5422-A
SERVICES RENDERED BROCHURES
$302.50
$430.00
$112.08
$456.16
$215.44
$9.03
$180.00
$302.50
$430.00
$112.08
$456.16
$215.44
$9.03
$180.00
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMPUSERVE, INC
COMPUTERLAND
DIGITAL EQUIPMENT CORP.
RICHARD L. DRAFFONE
FIRE PROTECTION PUBLICATIONS
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
HEWLETT PACKARD
HYDROTEX, INC.
I.C.P.A.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
COMPUTER INFO SERVICE
DISKETTES
RIBBONS
EXPENSES
PUBLICATIONS
FILM PROCESSING
MTCE & COPIES
MTCE & COPIES
MTCE & COPIES
PRODUCT MAINTENANCE
PRODUCT MAINTENANCE
MTCE SUPPLIES
MEMBER-ROSCOP/FELTEN B.
SERVICE
SERVICE
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$10.00
$110.00
$128.97
$273.00
$39.10
$39.96
$194.62
$115.36
$115.36
$635.25
$86.25
$554.80
$50.00
$5.61
$135.23
$55.72
$30.94
$95.92
$285.94
$61.60
$80.00
$166.52
$239.76
$89.50
$163.75
$225.00
$225.00
$225.00
$195.80
$141.51
$158.85
$40.73
$11.92
$63.05
$63.05
$63.05
PAGE 9
$10.00
$110.00
$128.97
$273.00
$39.10
$39.96
$425.34
$721.50
$554.80
$50.00
$140.84
$776.64
$329.26
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
A-AAGO LOCK SERVICE LOCKS & HASPS FILE CABINET
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC LINEN SERVICE
$31.16 $31.16
$128.30
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%29/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SUPPLIES
$63.05
$1,639.76
MIDWEST TRAINING ACADEMY
REGISTER WOODSIDE/BELMONTE
$190.00
$190.00*
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
TACTICAL UNIT CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.00
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
PARTS
$95.00
$35.00
PARTS
PARTS
$30.00
$160.00
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PARKING TICKETS
$1,584.00
$40.00
$1,584.00
$40.00
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
GREEK EXC PROG BANQUET
REFRIGERATOR
$480.00
$480.00
NOVAK & PARKER INC.
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$4.80
MISC EXPENSES
$1.59
MISC EXPENSES
$39.11
MISC EXPENSES
$1.81
MISC EXPENSES
$15.00
MISC EXPENSES
$11.00
MISC EXPENSES
$125.13
MISC EXPENSES
$50.94
MISC EXPENSES
$•95
MISC EXPENSES
$13.20
$263.53*
ERIC E. PIEE
RADIO REPAIRS
$510.00
$44.50
$510.00
$44.50
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES
MEMO PADS RICHARDSON
TYPEWRITER MTCE
$270.90
$270.90
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
REPAIR RADIATOR P-15
$90.00
$90.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$10,677.31
GENERAL FUND
$10,677.31
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
A-AAGO LOCK SERVICE LOCKS & HASPS FILE CABINET
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC LINEN SERVICE
$31.16 $31.16
$128.30
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
BRENT BAUER
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CONNECT INC.
KENNETH DIX
SAM DIX - F.D.
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
FACTORY MUTUAL ENG. CORP.
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
JOHN HANSON
HARRIS EQUIPMENT
IGE, INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
INDUSTRIAL FIRE WORLD
J. E. KREGER & CO.
KREST UNIFORMS, INC.
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
CLARENCE LEHMANN
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MICHAEL MANGIAMELE
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
MOTOROLA, INC.
NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS FIRE
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
PAGE AMERICA
PHYSIO -CONTROL
PROFESSIONAL FINISH
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SIMON-DUPLEX, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
LINEN SERVICE
LINEN SERVICE
$76.82
$296 94
EXPENSES
$$76.50
$117.50
SERVICE
$225.51
$10.24
$225.51
$10.24
BILLING
EXPENSES
$117.50
$117.50
EXPENSES
$117.50
$104.19
$117.50
$104.19
MICE SUPPLIES
PUBLICATIONS
$15.00
$15.00
GLOVES
HELMETS
$195.93
$315.11
$511.04
EXPENSES
$117.50
$883.91
$117.50
$883.91
PARTS
CYLINDER OXYGEN
$19.00
$19.40
SERVICE
$192.14
$460.46
SERVICE
SERVICE
$32.19
SERVICE
$21.10
$25.00
$705.89
$25.00
SUBSCRIPTION
REFLECTIVE DECALS
$443.00
$443.00
ALTER TRAFFIC VESTS
$40.00
$14.75
$40.00
$14.75
PARTS
EXPENSES
$117.50
$117.50
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$75.69
$49.90
$125.59
FAX PAPER
EXPENSES
$117.50
$117.50
REBUILD ALTERNATOR
ALT, REG & STARTER
$65.00
$160.00
$225.00
BATTERIES
$479.55
$200.00
$479.55
$200.00
REGISTRATIONS
3 VISITS
$294.00
$294.00
SERVICE
$116.03
$8,656.11
$116.03
$8,656.11
EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
$134.56
$134.56
MACHINE SERVICE
$77.35
$91.75
$77.35
$91.75
DOOR LATCH ASSEMBLY
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS, IN
SPRING ALIGN
RALPH L. STADLER, JR.
STANDARD SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO.
TECH SYN CORPORATION
KEVIN TREU
MARIO TRISTAN
UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES
WALGREENS
RICHARD WELLS
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
EQUIPMENT
$237.10
REPAIRS
$840.51
EXPENSES
$174.90
REPAIR ACID SUIT
$591.22
MTCE SUPPLIES
$33.60
EXPENSES
$174.90
EXPENSES
$174.90
TYPEWRITER MTCE
$58.05
BATTERIES
$106.66
EXPENSES
$117.50
***TOTAL**
$16,702.81 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PAGE 12
$237.10
$840.51
$174.90
$591.22
$33.60
$174.90
$174.90
$58.05
$106.66
$117.50
$16,939.91
$237.10
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED SEPT $27,410.00 $27,410.00
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS WHITE SHEETING 911 SIGNS $155.70 $155.70
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $27,565.70
GENERAL FUND $27,565.70
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES $651.95 $651.95
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8129%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VENDOR
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VERTICAL BLINDS
$26.97
$2,564.00
$26.97
$2,564.00
CARSON PIRIE SCOTT
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
MINI DANISH FOR SEMINAR
$ 177.15
$7.80 177.15
COMMUNITY
CAB CO.
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
BUDGET ALLOCATION
$2,250.00
$2,250.00
SHELTER, INC.
UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES
TYPEWRITER MICE
$33.75
$25?.65
$33.75
$257.65
V & G PRINTERS INC.
FORMS
***TOTAL**
$5,999.27
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
$5,999.27
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
LEGAL NOTICE CHAS HEARING
$131.04
$1,200.40
$131.04
.47
$1$200.00
MIDWEST CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SERVICES RENDERED
VILLAGE SHARE SIGN RELOC
$$13.01
DENNIS MILLER
FILM
$13.01
QUALEX, INC.
STELZER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
CDBG 419 N RUSSEL
13,845.00
$22.50
$13,845.00
$22.50
UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES
TYPEWRITER MTCE
BUSINESS CARDS
$57.00
$57.00
V & G PRINTERS INC.
***TOTAL**
$15,270.02
PLANNING AND, ZONING DEPARTMENT
$292.51 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$14,977.51
GENERAL FUND
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
A-AAGO LOCK SERVICE
ABM, INC.
ADVANCE MACHINE COMPANY
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
BESSIE BARNES
BILL'S LAWN & POWER
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
BUSSE HARDWARE
CADE INDUSTRIES
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COURTESY HOME CENTER
ED CURTIS RENTAL, INC.
DES PLAINES GLASS COMPANY
DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC.
FREUND INTERNATIONAL
G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
HOFF CORPORATION
HYDROTEX, INC.
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
KNAPP SHOES INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
KEYS
$16.20
KEYS
$15.58
$31.78
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$161.00
$161.00
PARTS
$85.25
$85.25
PARTS
$14.73
$14.73
OPTICOM CALLS
$124.00
$124.00
PARTS
$11.29
$11.29
SjW SHARED COST PROGRAM
$153.00
$153.00
MiUTFFLER COVER
$7.13
$7.13
AUTO PARTS
$215.45
$215.45
REMOVED & INSTALL CONTROLS
$70.00
$70.00
SUPPLIES
$7.47
$7.47
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$315.00
$315.00
CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
$46.05
$46.05
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$1,263.41
$1,263.41
WATER SERVICE
$67.37
$67.37
JANITORIAL SERVICE 8/1-15
$2,076.00
$2,076.00
BF80-JT-17006
$142.94
$142.94
PLUMBING FIXTURE
$27.99$27.99
POWER RAKE
$30.00
$30.00
GLASS
$742.00
GLASS
$11.00
$753.00
TOPSOIL JULY 91
$280.00
$280.00
PARTS
$355.47
$355.47
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$152.63
UNIFORM SERVICES
$143.62
$296.25
TIRE SERVICE
$18.50
TIRES
$1,079.10
$1,097.60
6" ADJ ROOF CURB
$91.25
$91.25
SUPPLIES
$107.25
$107.25
SUPPLIES
$28.47
$28.47
TURF MOWING
$1,620.00
$1,620.00
MICE SUPPLIES
$554.80
$554.80
THERMOCOUPLES
$36.00
$36.00
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
WADE KOLB
LAND AND LAKES CO
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MIDWEST LUBE, INC.
MIDWEST ELEC. APPL. SERV. CEN.
MIDWESTERN RELIABLE EQUIPMENT
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
P & W INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SAFETY SHOES
SAFETY SHOES
SAFETY SHOES
SAFETY SHOES
SAFETY SHOES
REIMB SAFETY SHOE REPAIR
REFUSE DISPOSAL
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
PARTS
SAW BAR
MICE AGREEMENT COPIER
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
MICE SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25-00
$25.00
$28.00
$594.00
$979.14
$61.18
$22.05
$11.03
$17.03
$19.08
$2.82
$15.45
$7.40
$13.00
$7.50
$16.95
$3.05
$10.65
$18.09
$43.15
$44.70
$8.88
$72.56
$825.00
$45.00
$85.00
$$277.84
$20.00
$1.00
$5.00
$22.80
$4.92
PAGE 15
TOTAL
$175.00
$28.00
$594.00
$1,148.18
$99.39
$44.70
$8.88
$72.56
$825.00
$180.00
$27.84
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
STREET DIVISION
PLANT CLINIC
REPUBLIC ALUMINUM, INC.
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
STAR DISPLAYS
THOMAS EQUIPMENT CORPORATION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VULCAN SIGN
WEARGUARD
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
PLANT SAMPLE FUNGUS ID
SUPPLIES
AUGUST PEST CONTROL
AUGUST PEST CONTROL
AUGUST PEST CONTROL
AUGUST PEST CONTROL
AUGUST PEST CONTROL
AUGUST PEST CONTROL
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
ALARM RELOCATION FEE
SUPPLIES
CLOTHING
$14,491.92 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
$1.71
$4.35
$69.21
$5.00
$210.00
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$26.00
$65.75
$127.60
$373.10
$165.98
***TOTAL**
PAGE 16
*
$128.99*
$5.00
$210.00
$240.00
$26.00
$65.75
$127.60
$373.10
$165.98
$14,615.92
$124.00
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ABM, INC.
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$1,490.00
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$100.00
$1,590.00
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$10.29
$10.29
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
PARTS
$19.59
$19.59
B & H INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$42.45
SUPPLIES
$6.60
SUPPLIES
$12.09
$61.14
BADGER METER INC
WATER METERS
$129.00-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8129191
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER METERS
$1,016.00
WATER METERS
$635.00
WATER METER
$127.00
WATER METERS
$1,920.36
WATER METERS
$4,900.32
$8,469.68
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
AUTO PARTS
$215.45
$60.00
$215.45
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
REBUSH IH SPINDLES
14.50
PARTS
REBUSH IH SPINDLES
$60.00
$134.50
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CELLULAR PHONE SERVICE
$46.04
$45.88
$46.04
$45.88
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
SUBSCRIPTION
BJ80-JT-23598
$4,116.07
$4,116.07
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH67-JT-1310-A
$267.63
$267.63
E & H UTILITY SALES
MTCE SUPPLIES
$775.08
$1,617.82
$2,392.90
FRIES AUTO INC.
HYDRANTS
TOW SERVICE
$65.00
$152.62
$65.00
G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SERVICES
$143.63
$296.25
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
$66.71
$333.54
METER INSTALLATION
METER INSTALLATION
$122.30
WATER METER LABOR
WATER METER LABOR
$155.65
$289.64
$967.84
HYDROTEX, INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$554.80
$203.83
$554.80
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$533.12
SERVICE
SERVICE
$37.04
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$97.32
SERVICE
$17.17
SERVICE
$17.06
SERVICE
24.99
SERVICE
$18.37
$1,010.16
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE PHONE SYSTEM
$512.42
$400
$512.42
$4.00
KINDER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY
FLAT HEAD BOLTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%29/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
KNAPP SHOES INC.
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
SAFETY SHOES
$25,00
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
$175.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$594.00
$594.00
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
CAR RENTAL
$3,720.00
$3,720.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$15.45
PARTS
$21.08
PARTS
$26.00
$62.53
LAYNE-WESTERN COMPANY, INC.
SERVICES WELL 11
$1,016.00
$1,016.00
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$50.50
SUPPLIES
$188.20
SUPPLIES
$21.75
SUPPLIES
$21.75
$282.20
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
SUPPLIES
$38.25
$38.25
M & M RADIO LAB
MICE SENSITIVITY CONTROL
$16.50
MTCE SENSITIVITY CONTROL
$38.00
$54.50
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
MTCE AGREEMENT COPIER
$825.00
$825.00
MJB TOOLS
TOOLS
$73.65
$73.65
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
PARTS
$120.00
$120.00
NET MIDWEST, INC.
WATER SAMPLES
$205.00
$26.28
$205.00
$26.28
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
$7.98
$7.98
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER
PARTS
$63.30
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
$103.30
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.21
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$5.80
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$87.18
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$30.41
$124.60*
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE WATER BILLS
$528.89
$528.89*
RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
FILM PROCESSING
$22.49
$22.49
ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$55.68
$55.68
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29191
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ROTANIUM PRODUCTS COMPANY
MTCE SUPPLIES
$198.34
$444.00
$198.34
$444.00*
LAURA SCHULTZ
FIRE HYDRANTS PAINTED
$348.00
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
$141.00
SUPPLIES
$2,016.00
$2,505.00
SOLVENT SYSTEMS INT -L. INC.
OIL FILTER
MTCE SUPPLIES
$65.00
$220.63
$65.00
$220.63
SPARLING INSTRUMENTS CO., INC.
SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO.
REPAD & REPAIR SEAT
$98.50
$98.50
TELECADE
EQUIPMENT
$412.00
$165.98
$412.00*
$165.98
WEARGUARD
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
CLOTHING
SUPPLIES
$537.85
$537.85
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$33,462.29
WATER & SEWER FUND
$33,462.29
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
$ 22.84
$9.03
BH66-JT-3710 A
BH66-JT-5262-A
$219.79
BH66-JT-5266-C
$226.08
BH68-JT-7498-A
$22.84
$500.58
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$120.48
102.20
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$100.90
$323.58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
$11.80
$11.80
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$835.96
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $835.96
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
AA SWIFT PRINT, INC.
RECYCLING FLYERS
$846.75
$846.75
MIDWEST DECAL
RECYCLING DECALS
$1,009.55
RECYCLING DECALS
$2,552.00
REFUSE/YARD STICKERS
$3,200.95
REFUSE/YARD STICKERS
$1,049.05
$7,811.55
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$8,658.30
GENERAL FUND
$8,658.30
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ACTA COMMUNICATIONS
MODEM CABLE
$30.00
$30.00
ACTON MOBILE INDUSTRIES, INC.
TRAILER RENTAL
$230.00
TRAILER RENTAL
$230.00
TRAILER RENTAL
$200.00
TRAILER RENTAL
$1,563.30
TRAILER RENTAL
$1,784.85
TRAILER RENTAL
$1,553.18
$5,561.33
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
TOOLS
$15.45
$15.45
ADVANCED OFFICE SYSTEMS, INC.
SERVICES
$2,000.00
$2,000.00
ELBERT AINGER
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
$898.00
$898.00
JAMES J. BAUM
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
$900.00
$900.00
BUSSE HARDWARE
SUPPLIES
$11.51
$11.51
CARPETS BY RAY & SONS
CARPETING
$120.00
$120.00
COMPUTERLAND
EQUIPMENT
$1,830.00
$1,830.00
CONNECTRONIX CORPORATION
EQUIPMENT
$614.00
$614.00
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
COURTESY HOME CENTER
E & H UTILITY SALES
GREGORY MOTOR EXPRESS
RANDY HAGGERMAKER
HEIGHTS CERTIFIED PLUMBING, IN
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
KOOIKER TILE, INC.
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
ADA M. ROSENBERG
STANK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
VON SYDOW'S MOVING & STORAGE
WEST TOWN REFRIGERATION CORP.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PIPE HEATING CABLE
$123.95
$123.95
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
$1,827.90
EQUIPMENT
$773.00
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
$150.00
PLUMBING SUPPLIES
$275.00
$3,025.90
MOVE EQUIPMENT
$300.00
$300.00
PAINTING
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
INSTALL VALVES
$3,052.00
$3,052.00
SUPPLIES
$29.20
$29.20
INSTALL CARPET
$1,190.00
$1,190.00
LEAF LOADER
$28,435.00
$28,435.00*
SUPPLIES
$32.40
SUPPLIES
$34.15
SUPPLIES
$22.20
SUPPLIES
$10.95
SUPPLIES
$22.65
SUPPLIES
$17.50
$139.85
P3 SQUAD CONVERSION
$869.05
P18 SQUAD CONVERSION
$959.65
$1,828.70
MISC EXPENSES
$124.02
$124.02*
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$23,821.00
$23,821.00
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
$720.00
$720.00
ANTENNA LABOR & EQUIP
$1,850.00
$1,850.00
EQUIPMENT
$36.64
$36.64
MOVING COSTS
$5,657.50
$5,657.50
BOILER TUNE UP
$762.00
$762.00
***TOTAL**
$84,576.05
$26,339.00 VEHICLE
REPLACEMENT FUND
$30,263.70
$7,577.90 POLICE
& FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$20,395.45
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BIRDELL ELIASON ((WENDT
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORI AL SOCI
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PROSPECT BIKE SHOP
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/29/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BG21-JT-1838-A $716.80 $716.80
BH67-JT-3858-B $24.86 $24.86
WE THE PEOPLE PAINTING $500.00 $500.00
2ND QTRLY PAYMENT $2,875.00 $2,875.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $66.00 $66.00
RAIN GUTTER BRACKETS $29.99 $24.99
$4,212.65
***TOTAL** $4,212.65
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $931,889.50
DATE RUN 8/29/91
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23
ACCOSUMMARAYABLFUNDPRO AL LISTING ID-APPBAR
TIME RUN 10.46.28
/91
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$535,427.83
21
FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND
$26,339.00
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$124.00
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$16,374.25
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,417.74
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$80,497.63
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,371.35
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$30,263.70
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$95,270.10
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$16,565.00
53
POLICE & FIRE BOND PROCEEDS
$21,055.45
55
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
$5,000.00
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$40,799.07
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$42,205.63
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$9,178.75
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $931,889.50
WHEREAS, Adult Day Care is a community-based group program
designed to meet the needs of functionally impaired adults
through a structured, comprehensive program; and
WHEREAS, these programs include a variety of health, social,
and related support services in a protective setting during
any part of the day; and
WHEREAS, in addition, the centers provide caregivers respite
from the constant demands of the care -giving role and allow
many caregivers to continue their own employment; and
WHEREAS, to date, there are more than 80 programs publicly and
privately funded throughout the state.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim September 16-20, 1991, as
NATIONAL ADULT DAY CARE WEEK in the Village of Mount Prospect.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
Dated this 3rd day of September, 1991
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce works with the
business community to advance the civic, economic, industrial,
professional and cultural welfare of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, chambers of commerce have contributed to the civic and
economic life in Illinois for 153 years since the founding of
the Galena Chamber of Commerce in 1838; and
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois is home to international chambers
of commerce, the central region office of the U.S. Chamber of
Commerce, the Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and more than
300 local chambers of commerce; and
WHEREAS, the chamber of commerce and its members provide
citizens with a strong business environment that increases
employment, the retail trade and commerce, and industrial growth
in order to make the Village of Mount Prospect a better place to
live; and
WHEREAS, the chamber of commerce encourages the growth of
existing industries, merchants and services, and encourages new
firms and individuals to locate in the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, 1991 is the 76th anniversary of the founding of the
Illinois Association of Chamber of Commerce Executives, an
organization devoted to the professional development and
training of chamber executives; and
WHEREAS, the state and local chambers of commerce act as
liaisons between governmental entities and the business
community in order to foster better relations.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, proclaim September 22 through 28, 1991 as
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK and call its significance to the
citizens of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Velma W. Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
Dated this 3rd day of September, 1991.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1991
SUBJECT: NEW OWNERS - ALVEE'S LIQUOR STORE,
1141 MT. PROSPECT PLAZA, CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE
Mr. and Mrs. Min came in to request a Class C Liquor License for Alvee's retail store
that is in operation at Mt. Prospect Plaza. The Mins reside at 212 North Stevenson
Lane in Mount Prospect and have resided there for approximately 12 years.
They wish to purchase the entire business, having the hours remain the same and the
layout of the store remain the same. They feel that Mr. Min, who has worked on
occasions at this establishment, has a thorough understanding of its operations and with
their close proximity to the retail store would be able to make it operate more
efficiently. The present owners have to hire a number of employees to assist them and
Mr. Min feels that running it as a family operation will allow him to get a better return
on his investment.
Mr. and Mrs. Min have not had a Liquor License in their name in the past nor have
they worked other than a very limited basis at this establishment. All of the children
of the Mins are over the age of 21 and live out of the home. The Mins presently have
a contract pending closure upon the issuance of a License to the Mins. 1 have
encouraged both of them to take the Retail Sellers Course at Harper College and also
to work with our Police Department, in particular, in understanding how to check for
proper identification. They indicated they already made arrangements to contact our
Police Department.
JOHN FULTON DI ON
JFD/rcw
attachment
VILLA E OF MOUNT EEO 'EC
COOK COLNrY, I
LOCAL LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR RETAIL LIQUOR DEALER'S LICENSE
RENEWAL DATE
NEW V ($150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of M
Liquor License; one-time only fee)
Honorable Gerald L. Farley, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as
Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of
January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount
Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois:
The undersigned, /41J,A) 5 COAADA4 7Z0,V
hereby makes application for a Class C liquor dealer's license for the period ending
April 30, 19 5� , and tenders the sum of $ 2. � otos Q the prescribed fee as set
forth in the following:
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106):
Annual Fee
CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00
CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00
CLASS C: Retail package only 2,000.00
CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00
CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000.00
CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine;
limited number of special events to include
full service bar facilities; consumption on
premises only 00.00
CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00
CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00
CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non -
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises 1,750.00
CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,000.00
CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge 2,500.00
CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00
CLASS V: Retail package - wine only 1,500.00
CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only
and at dining tables only 1,500.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL
Your petitioner, C 0 A P 0 /Z 17,/'0 doing business as
A L
It 1� 1, -7 6, q 0 3 respectfully requests
permission to operate a retail liquor businiss it //1/7—^7- 101zo.;Pe-,f7- el4Z4
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Description and name of premises: 11V1 /67 7- 0 /L
it'/Lt9A-1741,1' Z OCgregl 111r7,qrA-1 4 71? -;"o
(Description must be complete as to floor area, frontage, etc.)
Is applicant owner of premises:
If not owner, does applicant have a lease? « State date applicant's lease expires:
If not owner, attach copy of lease hereto. (,0Sa,-VV6 Z
Does applicant have a management contract with another person or entity for the
operation or management of the licensed premises? V47
If so, state the name and address of the manager or management company. -,IJ14..._
. (The manager or management company must complete
the same application as the owner).
Is applicant an individual,Er:p:oratio a co -partnership or an association? (Circle one)
If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number:_ '&V4
If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof: A
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
4
If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation:_ .7t /- J'AI'7 -- S
If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date
qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois:
11014
If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social
Security Numbers of Officers and Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of
birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than
5% of the stock of such corporation.
OFFICE AND/OR
PERCENT OF
NAME ADD-BESS STOCK HELD
SuNIV jA) ,21_) N. .5 7Z / j,A/5 O.A) ,4f -r )OA;: -5 PC6 r -71
Date of Birth:,L,o - 1/7 Social Security # 41e90 -0). -130 Phone #Lj�j 0
A-1 4 06 7-,rg 0
Date of Birth: Social Security #4/01 4o - 5'� Phone #-20?) 9-,? 7 -
Date of Birth: Social Security # — Phone
(Additional information to be included on a —separate listing.)
Objects for which orgaiiii,_,an is formed: vvre* CO3Qi0-)114,rJ I I " -11,fr e., J;.) J-/
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or
any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been
convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? A) Q If so, explain:
If applicant is an individual, state age: u14 Marital status:
Is applicant a citizen of the United States? If a naturalized, citizen, state date and
place of naturalization:
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to
the filing of this application?
Local address:
ME=
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: A F -r,4 - L 6,E
v1 L
State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time:
How long has applicant been in this business?
Is the applicant an elected public official? No If so, state the particulars thereof:
Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public
official?------
In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any
political contributions within the past 2 years?_ 14)0
If so, state the particulars thereof.
Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? Vo If so, designate title:
Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp?
0 If so, state the reasons therefor.
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of
subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of
the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? —.4)Q If so, list
date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever
ver made similar application for a similar or other license on premises
other thandescribed in this application? I&La_ If so, state disposition of such
application:
Is applicant qualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor
business? � Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal
government or by any state or subdivision thereof? r) 0 If so, explain:
Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed
by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village?
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United
States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the
conduct of his/her place of business?
Does applicant currently y Dram Sho Insurance coverag, * If "Yes," attach
copy. 6'. 0, -Z a,�� C 14 -OA 7dg - 3a-3 --S-1 q /
If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop
Insurance coverage? (If the answer to either of the foregoing questions is "No,"
no license shall issue.)
Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the time of
filing?
State name and address of each surety next below:
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of
manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application is made:
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
rs P k e -S -rol- W
Corporate Seal
(If applicant is corporation)
Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that _he is/are the
applic,int(s) for the license requested in the foregoing application; that —He- is/are of
good repute, character and standing and that answers to the questions asked in the
foregoing application are true and correct in every detail.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
) SS.
COUNTY OF COOK
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this ;q day of kli��jl- —,kD., 19_L
"OF FMA. SM1 Notal(y Pobric
A n
WKS
0
VAU Of on*
My C*WWw E*rft 1243-91
i
APPLICATION APPROVED;
Local Liquor Control Commissioner
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: July 31, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-37-V-91, 205 South Audrey Lane
As you will see in the attached recommendation letter, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted
to deny a front yard variation at 205 South Audrey Lane. A side yard variation was
approved.
This memo is being written to advise the Village Board that the petitioner has revised the
site plan to substantially reduce the front yard variation. This revision would meet the goals
expressed by the Zoning Board and staff at the public hearing.
The revised site plan is attached, and depicts the garage addition maintaining the same front
setback as the house. However, because the frontage of the lot curves along Audrey Lane,
maintaining the same setback results in a 3' encroachment into the 30' required yard.
Staff would recommend approval of the revised plan, as this minimizes the variation, and
still meets the needs of the petitioner in providing an additional garage space.
11138500
t�x[4.par, .
� 1�2-r * ii
�- � r� �{ , I �. �-I �- d � � � N�--,-t.-cwt ►� ,_ � �,� r�
. t .
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-37-V-91, Frank DiVita
LOCATION: 205 South Audrey Lane
DATE: July 22, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Frank DiVita. The applicant is requesting the following
variations to accommodate an addition to an existing one -car garage at 205 South Audrey
Lane:
1) Section 14.1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30' as required by
code.
2) Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" side yard setback rather than 9.25' as required by
code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, Mr. DiVita explained that he wanted to create a two -car garage by adding to
his one -car garage. He stated that the angle of his lot line limits how much width could be
added to the side to avoid significantly impacting his neighbor. Adding to the front provides
additional length to the garage.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the applicants's lot is wedge-shaped with a curved
frontage which contributes to the need for the requested variations. She noted that it might
be possible to modify the proposed building plan to minimize the front yard encroachment
by adding extra length toward the back.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Some concerns were expressed that
the house is currently for sale and whether the proposed addition was for the applicant's
future use. The Zoning Board also expressed concerns about the degree of front yard
encroachment proposed. The Zoning Board expressed support for the alternative suggested
by staff to add to the back rather than to the front of the existing garage.
Accordingly, by a 0-7 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of a variation
to Section 14,1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback. They indicated that any addition
should be flush with the front of the existing house. Also, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board
of Appeals recommends approval of a variation to Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" side yard
setback to accommodate an addition to the existing garage at 205 South Audrey Lane.
JF:cl
3
'"""'"^�,,, C'F,tAe'M+rswls �t; e:«✓"w' 9 u aa�",� � ;r �
uz
ILS IL Tr2 SC. Mi IS 8 421 NsiT:3 D It �• i
50. ?I0. F aIC�:IYZ92 :: SW:'S ?.;at (T
�.L'"li1iA fF g'sC: tt2: 10. 2cu:•:+'iSP 41 :•Qt ^3. "ass 11. SAM !Y
IN GCCL
u
air
Z�vje Ra,��k Y
vce
saYDs•NG t
" Te.
Y eKPi9 y4e 1 `MASK A!H �•-4� VA'St aV W�"
{y,{y�qw �Q NOw9l W.nf•YS �a w.1 h"YD <.O GAT.aN
M6G'T ASL 1
MGG MlEli %K ..
555 i � �" tDT lMSM!%.4Y9NS
�Y µ ,. �l* CK "' u• ... _ - .%'Np!M At C=
PAtTi "1'MKrCPCFa
i . v.
i4 a v s Cc• 04 r 5
rts' pz • t.�Y'B coC•NGfc. •...� ---- SYI�
P "14tA5.,'C: p1 p ,pk "kms";
.qNORMscATE of D
CWWTV 00, C' �„ r. 1 M" l4... •, 'P'''Am `..
: �• w,5..�wr, e.Y liy � �r�.+l."Iw..+ek � �°
SOW
6�'
LM-1-1'pl
"2 _ �....._...........
I
'
AY:
x
r
s
M
MI'�UTES OF T HE MEI-_Tl'G OF I'HE
1'10�_N'T PROSPECT DO,-'�RFj OF APPEALS
1 4 H ea r, i n 9
Daze: Jul_.� 18, 1991
F, E ' F IT 1 Frank DiVi to
S',,'B,J ECI T PROPHRTI 205 South Audrey Lane
P UB L I (.'A T 10 , D AT F July 2, 1991
RJ�-'Q1,"EST: Variations from Section 1.4.1102
to allow a 23'-6" front yard
setback rather than 30' as
required by Code. Section
14.1102 to allow a 6'-9"
sideyard setback rather than
9.25' as required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.11.02 to
allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30' as required
by Code; Section 14,1102 to allow a 6'-9" sideyard setback
rather than 9.25' as required by Code.
The petitioner, Mr. Frank DiVita of 205 S. Audrey Ln.,
presented his case stating that he would like to build an
addition onto an existing one -car garage. Mr. DiVita stated
that he is on a pie shaped and it is difficult to build. any
thing without a variation of his front and side yards.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the applicant is on a wedged shape lot with a
curved front yard. Because the side lot line is angled it
would not be possible to construct another garage bay without
a sideyard encroachment. Miss Farnham stated staff suggested
that the applicant consider adding toward. the back rather
than the front to achieve the desired garage length. This
would reduce the variation request for the front yard
setback. She noted that the front lot line is curved and even
if the addition were flush with the existing house, some
7
7BA-37-V-91
July 18, 1..991
Page 2 of 2
enarnacti, ment i,ko tijc,; front yard would result,
Mr. Lannon questioned why the applicant need a too -car
garage.
Mr. DiVita stated that he owns three cars.
Mr. Lannon asked if this had anything to do vith his house
being up for sale to improve the property value.
Mr. DiVita stated that he uanted the two -car garage before he
put hip. house UP for sale.
The Board then generally discussed the case,
Mr. Lannon stated he would not vote in favor of a 6_5'
reduction in the required front yard. He also stated concerns
about the propose construction Project being for speculative
purposes.
ChairmanBasnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a 23'-6" front yard setback rather
than 30' as required by Code as shown on petitioners exhibit
jl
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded
UPON ROLL CALL. AYES: None
NAYS: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
Motioned denied by a vote of 0-7.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a 6'-9" sideyard setback rather than
9,25' as required by Code.
Mr. 2rettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded,
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
5
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT",
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN M
FROM:
DAVID A CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
JULY 11, 1991
CASE NO.:
ZBA-37-V-91
APPLICANT:
FRANK DI VITA
ADDRESS:
205 SOUTH AUDREY LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A— R. :
R-1 Single Family Residential
10,839 sq. ft
35.4%; 23% front yard proposed
0.23
1�
Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 2
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
RM114M
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of an
addition to the existing one -car garage:
1. Section 14.1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30 ft. as required by
Code.
2. Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'.9" sideyard setback rather than 9.25 ft. as required by
Code.
Summary of application. The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to an existing
one -car garage, Four feet will be added to the front and 10.5 feet to the side to create a
two -car garage. The proposed addition will encroach 6.5 ft. into the required 30 ft. front
yard and 2.25 ft. into the required 9 ft. sideyard.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential I impact: The applicant's lot is wedge-shaped
with a curved frontage. The lot frontage is 90.5 ft. which requires a 9 ft. sideyard. Staff
notes that the lot is 82 ft. wide at the building line which would require an 8.2 ft. sideyard.
The existing house was built parallel to the north lot line. Consequently, the angle of the
south lot line results in varied setbacks. The addition is proposed on the south side of the
existing garage with setbacks ranging from 11 ft to 6'-9" which accommodates the 2 ft. eave
overhang.
The garage addition will also encroach into the required 30 ft. front setback. Because the
lot frontage is curved, the encroachment varies from 3.42 ft. to 6.5 ft. with the front yard
reduced to 23'-6" at the closest point. Staff notes that the existing garage encroaches
1'-10?V into the front yard because of the curved frontage. The addition is parallel to the
front of the house, however, the curved frontage results in an increased encroachment.
Other homes in the block appear to have maintained the required 30 ft. front setback. The
proposed encroachment would be unique to the area and could set a precedent. Staff notes
that a mix of attached, one -car and detached two -car garages exist on the block.
It might be possible to eliminate the front yard encroachment by making some interior
design modifications which would add depth to the existing 20 ft. long garage. Or the
25 ddin
more to the back rather than extending forward.
Another alternative would be to construct a detached garage in the rear yard. The lot has
sideyards wider than 10 ft. which would allow installation of a driveway. A detached garage
could be located in the rear yard without variations. However, because of the depth of the
property, lot coverage would be increased substantially.
The applicant should address the feasibility of these alternatives.
116
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The applicant is also proposing a 1,106 sq. ft. room addition and 253 sq. ft. deck. These
improvements meet all Zoning Code requirements.
OIHER VILLAICA STAH COMMEND
No major concerns or objections were stated by other Village staff. Engineering notes that
downspouts should be directed toward the front or back.
S MARYIRECOMMENDAIION
Staff has some concerns about the front yard encroachment setting a precedent. Staff notes
that the curved lot frontage contributes to the encroachment. Reconfiguring the garage as
suggested, will meet the needs of the petitioner, and eliminate the front yard variation.
DMC:hg
VWL/
8/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2.05 SOUTH AUDREY LANE
WHEREAS, Frank DiVita (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
205 South Audrey Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot No. 41 in Hatlen Heights Unit No. Two, a Subdivision
in the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
WHEREAS, Petitioner requested variations from Section 14.1102 to
allow a 231611 front yard setback rather than 301 and to allow a
61911 side yard setback rather than 9.251 as required by code; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 37-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 18th day of
July, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Pror2ppgt Herald on the 2nd day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals approved the side yard
variation to allow a 61911 setback and recommended denial of the
variation from Section 14.1102 to allow a 231611 front yard setback;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner, being denied a front yard setback of 231611 on
the the 18th day of July, has revised the request and site plan,
requesting a variation from Section 14.1102 to permit a 271 front
yard setback rather than the 301 setback as required by code, and
approval of a 6'9" side yard setback having been approved by the
Zoning Board of Appeals on the 18th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 37-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation, as depicted on the revised site plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SEgTION TWO; The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102 to permit a side yard setback of 61911 and a
front yard setback of 271; and
ZBA 37-V-91
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section
14.604.B of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of ,1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS -.%,EC
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 1j.
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager llioc"" ILV ri
FROM:O David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-42-V-91, Walter Szarowicz - Appeal of Zoning Board Decision
LOCATION: 748 Whitegate Court
DATE: July 24, 1991
At their meeting of July 18, 1991, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-4 to deny variations
requested by Walter Szarowicz to accommodate widening of an existing driveway at 748
Whitegate Court. The following variations were denied:
1) Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 25' wide driveway rather than 21' as permitted by
code.
2) Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by code.
3) Section 14.1102 to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted
by code.
Subsequently, Mr. Szarowicz filed an application to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board
of Appeals.
Following is a summary of the testimony regarding this case, presented at the public hearing
on July 18, 1991.
At the meeting Mr. Szarowicz explained that he needs the additional driveway width to
accommodate his family's vehicles and to park a fishing boat and trailer on a paved surface
as required by code, without blocking the garage. He stated that his existing driveway is 18'
wide and he is proposing to add 7'.
Mr. Szarowicz also stated that he stores the boat during the winter (October 1 to March 31)
and uses it most weekends during the rest of the year.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the proposed 25' wide driveway is 4' wider than code
allows. Three feet of pavement could be added to the existing driveway without a variance
for driveway width. However, the lot currently exceeds the maximum 45% lot coverage
permitted. Therefore, any additional pavement results in the need for a lot coverage
variation. In addition, many requests for driveway width variations also result in the need
for a front yard lot coverage variation.
ZBA-42-V-91 - Walter Szarowicz July 24, 1991
Page Two
Ms. Farnham also noted that this variation request was filed in response to a complaint
about parking the boat trailer on the grass. Because this lot has side yards less than Twide,
it would be difficult to manoeuver the boat into the rear yard without going through the
neighbor's yard. It would also require removal of parts of an existing fence.
Four neighboring residents were present at the meeting to express concerns about the
proposed driveway widening. They had concerns about this driveway being wider than all
others on the block and about parking of a boat and trailer on the driveway.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was noted that Village Codes do not
prohibit parking of boats and trailers on the driveway. Some members stated that similar
variance requests for parking pads have been granted in the past. Some concerns were
expressed about the additional lot coverage.
Accordingly, by a 3-4 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of the
variations request by Walter Szarowicz to accommodate widening of the driveway at 748
Whitegate Court.
The Zoning Ordinance states that "any individual may file an appeal of the (Zoning Board
of Appeals) decision with the Village Board". Such appeal must be filed within 15 days of
the Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Szarowicz met this timetable.
All objectors who spoke at the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting have been notified of the
appeal.
To overturn the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals, an extraordinary vote of the
Village Board is required.
In conjunction with the appeal filed, Mr. Szarowicz submitted an alternative plan for
widening his driveway. The alternative plan indicates that the driveway be tapered from 25'
next to the garage to 21' at the property line (please see attached site plan). The driveway
would be 25' wide for a total length of 17' and then taper to a width of 21'. This would
result in an overall lot coverage of 48.5% (48.8% originally requested) and a front yard lot
coverage of 38.9% (39.9% originally requested).
Another alternative would be to only widen the driveway to 21'wh,.ch is the maximum width
permitted by code. This would eliminate the driveway width variation and the front yard
lot coverage variation. However, a variance would still be needed to allow additional lot
coverage which would total 47.3% of the lot area, 2.3% more than code permits.
JF:cl
G12
r4o� -aF_r2 ,
2S*
to'
is
1
40
to 0
if
----------
6*77
2 -ate JeW
are r)
50
r.t
7.
—IF
A
es
/V a.
r4o� -aF_r2 ,
2S*
�'•
davoft k�r�� -11; hi- V-91 3
are r)
7.
7777
�'•
davoft k�r�� -11; hi- V-91 3
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 42-V-91
Hearing Date: July 18, 1991
PETITIONER:
Walter Szarowicz
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
748 Whitegate
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 2, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow 251 wide
driveway rather than 21' as
permitted by Code. Section
14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot
coverage rather than 45% as
permitted by Code. Section
14.1102.A to allow 39.9% front
yard lot coverage rather than
35% as permitted by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variances from Section 14,3016.A,",
to allow a 25' wide driveway rather than 21' as permitted by
Code; Section 14,1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather
than 451 as permitted by Code and Section 14.1102,A to allow
39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by
Code.
The petitioner, Walter Szarowicz of 748 Whitegate, presented
his case stating that he moved from Chicago to Mount Prospect.
in April of 1991. He stated that he owns a fishing boat which
he had parked next to the driveway. Mr. Szarowicz stated that
his boat is 17' long and 4' off the. ground, Mr. Szarowicz
stated he would like to widen his driveway to park his boat
which is currently in the garage. Mr. Szarowicz stated that
he also has four cars.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the Codes require trailers to be parked on a
5
ZBA-42-V-91
July 18, 1991
Page 2 of 3
paved surface. Miss Farnham stated that the petitioner is
proposing 7' of additional pavement to the existing 18' wide
driveway. Miss Farnham stated that the lot is at the
maximum lot coverage. Also front yard coverage is over the
maximum which is common whenever driveways are widened on
standard sized lots. Miss Farnham suggested that the
applicant address whether a 21' wide driveway, which is
permitted by Code would meet his needs, or if the driveway-
could
rivewaycould be tapers from 25' to 21'.
Wes Pinchot, 747 Whitegate, stated that the boat alters the,
character of the neighborhood, Mr. Pinchot feels the
petitioner can make other arrangements to store the boat.
Mr. Lannon asked Mr. Pinchot if he's concerned with the
driveway width or the boat,
Mr. Pinchot stated that he is concerned about both, noting
that other driveways on the block meet Code for width.
David Lindgren, 743 Whitegate, stated that he feels the boat-
being
oatbeing parked an the driveway will decrease the value of the
homes and the appearance of the neighborhood.
Anthony Nudo, 742 Whitegate, state that he does not like the
boat parked on the driveway.
Margaret Szostak, 741 Whitegate, stated that the proposed.
wider driveway is not in conformity with the rest of the
block,
The Board suggested to park it in the rear yard.
Mr. Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated
that it must be parked on a paved surface,
Miss Farnham stated that the narrow sideyards and existing
fence make it almost impossible to get the boat into the back
yard without trespassing on the neighbors property.
Mr. Pratt asked where he stores it in the winter.
Mr. Szarowicz stated that he stores it in a marina on the
south side from October 1 to March 31, He Parks it at his
home from April 1 to September 30 and typically uses it every
weekend during this time.
Mr. Pinchot stated he does not see a hardship in this
request.
ri
ZBA-42-V-91
July 18, 1991
Page 3 of 3
The Board. then generally discussed the petitioners request.
Mr. Lannon stated that the Village permits trailers on a
paved surface and about a month ago the Zoning Board approved
a similar request. Mr. Lannon stated that the petitioner has
agreed to taper the driveway width.
Mr. Brettrager stated he has concerns on the lot coverage.
Chairman Basnik then entertained. a motion to grant the
petitioners request.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded..
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brettrager, Skowron
\AYS: Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 3-4.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
01
Vxi,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPER,:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W-1
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JULY 11, 1991
ZBA42-V-91
WALTER SZAROWICZ
748 WHITEGATE COURT
HLJLLL11 JI
rl��� it ���
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R. :
R-1 Single Family Residential
67.751 x 120' (8,130 sq. ft.)
48.8% (proposed); 39.9% (proposed front
N/A
E
f
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate widening of an existing
driveway:
1. Section 14.3016A3 to allow a 25 ft, wide driveway rather than 21 ft. as permitted by
Code.
2. Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code.
Section 14.1102-A to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as
permitted by Code.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to add 7 ft. of pavement to his existing
18 ft. wide driveway, The resulting 25 ft. wide driveway increases the front yard lot coverage
from 29.5% to 39.9% and the overall lot coverage from 46.5% to 48.8%. Variations are
required to allow this additional lot coverage.
The wider driveway is intended to accommodate the family's four vehicles and fishing boat.
Staff notes that this application was filed in response to a complaint about parking the boat
-trailer on the grass.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The proposed 7 feet of additional
pavement will line up with a sidewalk along the west side of the house which is .83 ft. from
the lot line. A strip of grass about 7 feet wide will remain between the parking pad and the
neighbor's garage.
The sideyard setbacks are less than 7 feet wide on this lot and the rear yard is entirely
fenced. For these reasons it could be difficult to transfer the boat and trailer to the rear
yard without removing the fence and going through the neighbor's yard.
Staff notes that no other driveways in the immediate block have been widened for parking
pads, Because the existing driveway is only 18 feet wide, three more feet could be added
without a variation. The applicant should discuss the need for a driveway wider than 21
feet.
A front yard lot coverage variation is necessary in most cases where a driveway is widened
on a standard -sized lot. The overall lot coverage variation is needed because the existing
lot has a non -conforming lot coverage. Any additional pavement would require a lot
coverage variation on this lot.
No major comments or objections were stated by other Village staff. Engineering notes that
the existing drainage pattern flows from west to east. Additional driveway pavement may
not alter this pattern.
lU
Gil Basnik, Chairman°
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The applicant has a boat and trailer that must be parked on a paved surface. This request
is an attempt to provide a parking area without blocking the garage. Staff notes that 3 feet
of additional pavement could he added without a variation to driveway width or front yard
lot coverage. The applicant should address whether a 21 foot wide driveway meets his
needs. Staff further notes that any additional pavement on this lot results in the need for
a lot coverage variation because the existing lot has a non -conforming coverage of 46.5%.
DMC:hg
i/
CZAI z
ROA ." ".
,` Co,rrr�rfs Povamenl`j
1
f
f
_•_•--'�::—tri—^k/�..."...�....._. .,.,_.,,,.,.. ,.,,._.
w ,7':»:t..d.drt
�JC
._•"., `` JPa°L"Jf.@'F'4w' ��
�,1-✓.r d OSJe/ra-
' �a
of
a5
3
.5
yN` .E�
rf"
C R �'�°
..r Gpc
ar few,v �.+.• Afv/ r �m .e 4v
W"0.
i
4
ell
♦
G� - L t pD5A
orf 10/VIX 7�8 o
C1
115 MEW
I
r
�t
w
�.
'!
• 'f"
SFr yflC
G;91
,X'
.,
f
f
u:
> 111
e
=—� '— %�rco�d 7615 w.nr.: t. s ♦
f" �
�
�8 is
u
� ��� ��
»��
S, yfd
Y
ir!
y
{ ' R #f TX CA r4E
Ct?+ /'Rr
�a`^ dl c ;rMo�.^crJo.r F�rem�.ff.� ("�.� 6. •3z.os,
G
:7
mrfwrf��rriw«Wuf0.refr�r .�'Jlfa.^ra✓.f
--..,.�i�'ia ''
i�..
/Z
VWL/
08/15/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 748 WHITEGATE COURT,
WHEREAS, Walter Szarowicz (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 748 Whitegate Court (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 2 in Central Village being a subdivision of the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11,
East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County,
Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner requested variations from Section 14.3016.A.3
to allow a 251 driveway width rather than 211 as permitted by Code,
Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather than 45%, and
Section 14.1102.A to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather
than the permitted 35%; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 42-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 18th day of
July, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount on the 2nd day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals had authority fo hear and
decide on the variations in ZBA Case No. 42-V-91; and
WHEREAS, after considering evidence and testimony the Zoning Board
of Appeals denied the request; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner chose to file an appeal of the decision of
the Zoning Board of Appeals as provided for in Section 14.604.D of
the Village Code; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board reviewed the appeal request of Walter
Szarowicz and concur with the findings of the Zoning Board of
Appeals in ZBA Case. No. 42-V-91.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby deny the appeal of Walter Szarowicz and
concur with the findings of the Zoning Board of Appeals in ZBA Case
No. 42-V-91.
SECTION THREE: The President And Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant a variation on a revised site plan
to permit a 47.3% lot coverage rather than 45% as stated in Section
14.1102.E to allow the installation of a conforming 211 driveway.
ZBA 42-V-91
Page 2 of 2
SECTION FOUR: Except for the variations granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
ordinance.
SECTION SIX: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager Tok
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-47-V-91, Ulrich Marks
LOCATION: 600 Carboy Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Ulrich Marks. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.2202.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' to accommodate a building addition at 600
Carboy Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting, Ulrich Marks presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Marks
explained that he is proposing to construct an 8,918 square foot building addition onto an
existing industrial building. The existing lot is quite small and the size of building addition
proposed is needed to allow maximum space utilization.
Renaldo Manlang, Architect, presented a floor plan and landscape plan. He indicated that
he has discussed the issue of on-site detention with the Village Engineering Department and
believes adequate detention storage can be provided in underground holding tanks.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that this is an existing non -conforming lot in terms of size
which contributes to the need for the variation. She noted that the addition would occupy
a green area currently used for on-site detention. She noted that the proposed addition
would primarily impact a parking lot and that landscaping could be provided to soften it's
impact.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that this is one of the most
attractively kept properties on the block. Some concerns were expressed about detention
requirements, and it was noted that on-site detention standards must be met to obtain a
building permit.
Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variance to allow a 10' rear yard at 600 Carboy Road, conditioned on:
1. Landscape plan approval by staff.
JF:cl
SMS��A ��
_.._ __----__,--------- _._,_.._.. 04
L
OF" THE REGULAR MEETING OF" THE
X101.N'T PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF .APPEALS
ZB.-\ CASE INO. 17-V-91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
PET17I()`�ER :
Ulrich Marks
S(-BJECT PROPERTY:
600 Carboy
PUBLIC TION, D,NTF,
July 9, 1991
REQUEST:
Variation from Section 11.2202.0
to allow a rear yard of 10' to
accommodate a proposed 8,918
sq.ft. building addition.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/TNTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.2202-0
to allot,; a rear yard of 10' to accommodate a proposed 8,918
sq.ft building addition. Code requires a 20' rear yard
setback.
The petitioner, Ulrich Marks of 335 S. Leonard, Arlington
Heights, presented his case stating that he needs more space
at his present building at 600 Carboy and would like to build
a 8,918 square feet addition.
Renaldo Manalang, Architect for Mr. Marks, stated that the
addition will occupy 10' of the 20' setback. Mr. Manalang
stated that there will still
11 be 10' of space in the rear
yard. Mr. Manalang stated that the petitioner plans to do
extensive landscaping. He also stated that they have talked
to the owner to the rear and they stated no objections. Mr.
Manalang stated that adequate detention will be provided and
they have consulted engineers.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that staff is concerned about the large size of the
addition and that the applicant should justify the need for
the space. Miss Farnham stated that the addition is taking up
major green space currently used for detention. The project
and will have to conform to the detention requirements in
3
ZBA-47-V-91
July 25, 1991
Page 2 of 2
orrIer to obtain a building permit. She also stated. that this
propert", in an 1-1 zoning distil id on a 1. acme parcel
�Dr CN »xisting nont
-cOnformln-d r%ott-g currenturrent 1-1, standards
p-.,ircels to be 4 aclressjaff suggests approval be
t,�,) approved, landscaping.
r. (',,issidy asked if the pet,i,ti(-.)ner addressed, the, staffs
concerns about detention.
Mr. Manalang stated that the engineers feel the building
addition will not require a lot of additional. detention
noting that the property also has a parking lot and existing
green space which can be tr:ilized for detention, Mr. Manalang
stated they- may possibly put in underground culverts for
detention.
Mr. Manalang then presented the Board with landscape plan
drawings.
Mr. Cassidy asked about the culverts.
Mr. Clements, director of Planning and Zoning stated that
culverts Could be used as detention storage.
Miss, Farnham stated that she talked to Chuck Bencic of
Inspection Services and he also mentioned culverts could be
used for this project.
The Board then discussed and had no objections.
Chairman Basnik then
petitioners request fg
prol'.)osed 8,918 square
exhibit #2 subject tD
staff.
Mr. Pratt moved. Mr.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:
NAYS:
Motion carried by a
This Case must still
tertained a motion to grant the
a 101 rear yard to accommodate a
set building addition as presented on
landscape plan approval by Village
ssidy seconded.
annon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
asnik
one
e of 5-0.
heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN,"
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-47-V-91
APPLICANT: ULRICH MARKS
ADDRESS: 600 CARBOY ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1-1 Light Industrial
LOT SIZE: 209' x 2331 (48,900 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 72%
F -A -R. : 0.47
a
VWL/
8/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOMED AT 600 CARBQY ROAD
WHEREAS, Ulrich Marks, (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
600 Carboy Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property),
legally described as:
Lot 5 in Elmhurst -Algonquin Industrial Park, Unit No. 2, being
a subdivision in the southeast 1/4 of Section 23, Township 41
North, range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian,
according to the plat thereof recorded June 20, 1968 as
Document No. 20409121, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.2202.0 to
permit a ten foot (101) rear yard setback instead of the required
20 feet in order to construct an 8,918 square foot building
addition onto an existing industrial building.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 47-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of July,
1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Pros'Oect Herald on the 9th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 47-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.2202.0 to permit a ten foot (101) rear yard setback
for a building addition.
SECTION THREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
and after its passage,approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John F. Dixon, Village Manager W__1
FROM:
David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT:
ZBA-48-SU-91, Rogers Corporate Park
LOCATION:
1840-1894 South Elmhurst Road
DATE:
July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use Permit application filed by Arthur J. Rogers and Company. The applicant
is requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) Ordinance #4156 to
allow limited retail uses in Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest comer of Elmhurst
Road and Algonquin Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991.
At the meeting William Schmidt, Chief Executive Officer for A. J. Rogers and Company,
presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Schmidt explained that several
prospective tenants have expressed interest in limited retail uses. In response, A. J. Rogers
and Company would like to allow limited retailing as an accessory to permitted industrial
uses.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the limited retail would
not include day-to-day retail activities that could potentially disrupt other industrial tenants
and create conflicts for available parking. He noted that this property was recently rezoned
from B-3 Commercial District and is surrounded by commercial/retail uses. Subsequently,
retail uses may be generally compatible with the area, but should be reviewed on a case
specific basis for compatibility.
Mr. Clements recommended that limited retail uses be allowed by a field change to the
existing Planned Unit Development. This would allow review by the Village Manager and
the Village Board on a case specific basis.
Mr. Clements stated that staff's major concern was parking. He explained that 165 spaces
are needed to meet parking demand for the proposed 20% office/80% warehouse mix of
uses. He indicated that 211 spaces would be needed to accommodate a 10% retail factor.
The corporate park provides 201 spaces which staff believes will be adequate to meet
anticipated parking demand. He noted that parking impact could be measured through the
field change process.
ZBA-48-SU-91, Rogers Corporate Park
Page Two
July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was noted that many potential limited
retail uses might generate parking demand on weekends rather than during the week when
other tenants are in operation. The Zoning Board concurred with the conditions suggested
by staff. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of
an amendment to P,U,D. Ordinance #4156 to allow limited retailing, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Field change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence by the Village Board.
2. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the total floor area of an 1-1 use.
3. Limited retailing shall he approved in writing by the property owner and property
manager.
4. No additional signs shall be allowed for retail uses.
JF:cI
11
ALGONQUIN
ROAD
-K
f)
kM
t A
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 48 -SU -91
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
Arthur J. Rogers & Co.
1840-1894 Elmhurst Road and
401-501 Algonquin Road
July 9, 1991
An Amendment to Special Use
Ordinance No. 4156 per Section
14.2201.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Robert Brettrager
Micheale Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting an amendment to Special Use
Ordinance No. 4156 per Section 14.2201. The amendment would
allow limited retail in the Rogers Corporate Park Planned
Unit Development, as incidental to a permitted I -I use.
The petitioner, William Schmitz of Arthur J. Rogers & Co,
presented the case stating that Rogers Corporate Park would
like an amendment to allow limited retail uses. Mr. Schmitz
stated that they had a recent client who was going to lease
10,000 square feet but wanted to have retail sales on
Saturdays and Sundays. They lost the client because they
could not accomodate their need for limited retailing. Mr.
Schmitz stated that Arthur J. Rogers & Co. will have total
control over the limited use and no space would be solely
leased as retail. Mr. Schmitz also stated that the Village
would benefit by additional sales tax. He also noted the
potential for spill over effects to other surrounding
retails. Mr. Schmitz stated that there will be no adverse
affect to neighbors or existing tenants and the corporate
park has adequate parking. Mr. Schmitz also stated that they
generally agree with staff recommendations but are requesting
15% of the space as retail to be available for limited.re-ta,iJ-
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this would be an amendment to the Planned Unit Development
ZBA-48-SU-91
July 25, 1991
Page 2 of 3
r r�) r. t, S which "
j�e [,,froperty� at Elmhurst and Algonquin Road hi ,h i aS
rt�-?zoned in March of 199'0 from a B-3 t,o 1-1 noting that 1-1
lines not allow retail uses, Mr. Clements stated that
tjrf-, petitioner does have a prospective client, that
manufacturers kitchen cabinets that would I Like to have some
type of showcase area which would include be minor retail
CIements stated that Arthur J. Rogersrealizes
realizes this. Mr. Clemen
that the I -easing will not be total retail and staff also
ts stated that amust be
amended. through with afield change by, the Village Manager
and Village Board. Mr. Clements stated that there limited
retail should not have a major impact on traffic. Staffs
primary t,�as regarding parking. Mr. Clements stated
tIlat 165 spaces are required for the corporate uses ,
calculated at a rate for 20% office and 30% warehouse use.
Using aretail factor of 10% the total parking needed would
be 211 spaces. paces. The Corporate Park has 201 spaces and Mr.
Clements stated that staff feels comfortable with that
amount.
Chai.rman Basnik questioned if there is a problem with
parking.
Mr. Clements stated that staff feels the existing number of
spaces is sufficient and 11mited retail use will, not, greatly
increase demand. He noted that the specific impact, could be
measured during the field change review process. Mr. Clements
stated that no additional signs should be allowed.
The Board then generally discussed the petitioners request
and had no objections.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for an amendment" to Special Use Ordinance
No. 41.56 per Section 14.2201 to allow limited retail use
subject to: 1. A field change by the Village Manager and
concurrence by the Village Board; 2. Retailing shall be
limited to no more than 10% of the total floor area, of an 1-1
use, 3. Limited retailing shall be approved,in writing by the
Property owner and propertymanager; 4. No additional signage
shall be allowed for retail 'uses.
Mr., Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
ZBA-48-SU-91
July 25, 1991
Page 3 of 3
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIIC, CHAIRMAN "L
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA48-SU-91
APPLICANT: ROGERS CORPORATE PARK
ADDRESS: 1840-1894 ELMHURST ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
--- 71 T-7ir--7
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1.1 Light Industrial
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A.R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)
Ordinance #4156 to allow limited retail uses in the Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest
comer of Elmhurst Road and Algonquin Road.
Summary of application: In March of 1990, the Rogers Company received approval of a
rezoning from B-3 to 1-1, and a P.U.D. to allow development of the Rogers Corporate
Park. Construction followed shortly thereafter, and at this time the project is completed,
and leasing has been very successful. During initial leasing, several prospective tenants
approached the Rogers Company and inquired about limited retail sales, from a warehouse
or showroom. The 1-1 Light Industrial District prohibits retail sales, so these uses were not
allowed.
As an example, a piano retailer hoped to lease 10,000 sq. ft. in the industrial park as a
warehouse and distribution facility for several retail locations. This company had hoped to
be able to sell pianos from the warehouse on Saturdays and for special promotions. This
limited retailing was not allowed, so the company chose not to use the Corporate Park for
their warehouse and distribution operation.
Also, a prospective tenant is a distributor of kitchen cabinets. This company would like to
sell directly to the public from a showroom, and this retailing would be minor and secondary
to the distribution operation.
Seeing that limited retailing would be beneficial to users in the industrial park, the Arthur
Rogers Company requested this amendment to the P.U.D. The Company emphasizes that
any retailing would be accessory to permitted industrial uses, and that it is not their intent
to have a tenant do actual day-to-day retail sales at the park.
ProDoqed PX.D. Amendment•, The applicant suggests that retailing be limited to 15% of
the total floor area of a business, or to a certain number of hours or days. Staff believes
that it is important that the Village be able to review and evaluate retail uses, to measure
their impact on adjoining uses and parking.
From looking at other suburban zoning ordinances, many industrial districts allow limited
retail uses as a Special Use.
Inasmuch as Rogers Corporate Park already exists with a Planned Unit Development, and
considering the types of limited retailing being proposed, a Special Use permit does not
seem appropriate. However, some review of such uses is important.
Staff recommends that limited retailing be allowed in Rogers Corporate Park, subject to:
1. Field change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence by the Village Board.
2. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the total floor area of an I-1 use.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
3. Limited retailing shall be approved in writing by the property owner and property
manager.
Lastly, staff notes that there are 201 parking spaces at the Rogers Corporate Park. The
parking requirement for the P.U.D. was calculated at a rate of 20% office space and 80%
warehouse/assembly space. This formula results in a parking requirement of 165 spaces.
Adding a 10% retail factor to the parking requirement would require 211 spaces. The
Planning staff believes that the 201 existing spaces are sufficient for the proposed limited
retailing.
05-
nor-j"mallwav, 11av-41,31gurmlllw
Inspection Services notes that the frequency of retailing in a warehouse/office building
might place the buildings into a mercantile classification. This could require modification
to the existing buildings. The petitioner should be aware that Building Code requirements
could be a factor.
n 4 W UN I IWA • log-wo-W
Staff recommends that P.U.D. Ordinance #4156 be amended to allow limited retailing, as
described above. Such approval should include a condition that no additional signs be
allowed for retail uses.
DMC:hg
VWL/
8/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4156
GOVERNING PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT
1840 - 1.a,2,4 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
WHEREAS, Arthur J. Rogers and Company (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend ordinance No. 4156, being
an Ordinance authorizing a Special Use in the nature of a Planned
Unit Development with respect to property commonly known as 1840-
1894 South Elmhurst Road (hereinafter referred to as the Subject
Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 1 in Rogers Corporate Park, being a subdivision of
part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
ow
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to ordinance No. 4156 to
allow limited retail uses in Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest
corner of Elmhurst Road and Algonquin Road; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for amendment
(designated as ZBA Case No. 48 -SU -91) before the zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of July
1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the
MQunt Prospect Herald on the 9th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the
following Ordinance regarding the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE* That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That SECTION THREE of Ordinance No. 4156 entitled "An
Ordinance Granting a Special Use in the Nature of Planned Unit
Development for Property Generally Located at the Southwest Corner
of Elmhurst and Algonquin Roads" is hereby amended to permit
limited retail uses as a permitted use exception in the Planned
Unit Development, and to amend SECTION THREE include alphabetically
the following conditions:
B. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the
total floor area of an I-1 use.
C. Limited retailing shall be approved in writing by the
property owner and property manager.
D. No additional signs shall be allowed for retail uses.
E. Limited retailing shall only be allowed with Field
Change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence
by the Village Board.
48 -SU -91
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1991
SUBJECT: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS
Prior to the passage of the Ordinance amending the Zoning Map and classifying the
Cook County School Bus property as an R-4 Residential District, the Board of Trustees
should pass a Resolution agreeing to enter into a settlement agreement with Cook
County School Bus, Inc., and directing the Mayor to execute the documents necessary and
the Village attorney, Pedersen and Haupt, be authorized to sign pleadings and take
whatever steps are necessary to effectuate the settlement.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
JFD/rcw
AMH02500A6032891
SETTLEMENTAGREEMENT
THIS SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT ("Agreement") is entered into on
this of October, 1990, by and between the VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT, ILLINOIS (hereinafter referred to as the "Village"), by
and through its Village President and the members of its Village
Board of Trustees (hereinafter referred to collectively as the
"Corporate Authorities"), on the one hand, and BEVERLY BANK, AS
TRUSTEE UNDER TRUST AGREEMENT DATED SEPTEMBER 10, 1968 AND KNOWN
AS TRUST NUMBER 8-1551 (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"),
and COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC., an Illinois corporation
(hereinafter referred to as the "Beneficiary"), on the other hand.
WHEREAS, the Village, a municipal corporation, organized under
the laws of the State of Illinois, is a home rule unit as defined
under the Illinois Constitution of 1970; and
WHEREAS, the Village has the power, undgr its ordinances, to
enter into a settlement agreement such as set forth herein; and
WHEREAS, Owner is the owner of record of a parcel of real
estate (hereinafter referred to as the "Subject Property"), which
real estate was contiguous to the corporate limits of the Village,
which real estate is commonly known as 3040 South Busse Road,
Arlington Heights, Illinois, and which real estate is legally
described as follows:
The North five acres (except the West 210 feet) of the
South 25 acres of the Southeast quarter of the Northeast
quarter of Section 22, Township 41 North, Range 11, East
of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook county, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Beneficiary is the beneficiary of the trust which
is the Owner of the Subject Property; and
WHEREAS, previously on March 3, 1987 and on August 4, 1987,
the Corporate Authorities of the Village passed ordinances
involuntarily annexing the Subject Property into the Village; and
WHEREAS, on.April 8, 1987, the Beneficiary filed a Complaint
for Declaratory Judgment, Injunction, Mandamus and Quo Warranto
Relief' against the Village, the Corporate Authorities, and others
in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, County Department,
Chancery Division, which was assigned case number 87 CH 3393; and
WHEREAS, the Village and Corporate Authorities have generally
denied the allegations contained in case number 87 CH 3393; and
WHEREAS, on June 15, 1988, the Owner and others filed a First
Amended Complaint in another action seeking inter alia, a
disconnection from the Village and other relief in the Circuit
Court of Cook County, Illinois, County J)epartment, Chancery
Division, which was assigned case number 87 CH 5503; and
WHEREAS, the Village and Corporate Authorities have generally
denied the allegations contained in case number 87 CH 5503; and
WHEREAS, case number 87 CH 5503 is currently pending in the
Supreme Court of Illinois as number 70513; and
WHEREAS, both the Village and Corporate Authorities, on the
one hand, and the Owner and Beneficiary, on the other hand, wish
- 2 -
to avoid the delay and expense of protracted litigation and to
resolve amicably all matters and issues actually or potentially in
controversy between them relating to case numbers 87 CH 3393 and
87 CH 5503.
NOW, THEREFORE, for good and valuable consideration, the
receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged,
including, but not limited to, the covenants and agreements
hereinafter set forth, the undersigned parties agree as follows:
1. Each party represents that it has full authority and
obtained the necessary approval to enter into and perform this
Agreement in accordance with its terms and conditions.
2. The Owner, prior to execution of this Agreement, will
file with the Village Clerk, a proper petition conditioned on the
terms and provisions of this Agreement, to rezone the Subject
Property from the R -X Single Family Residence District to the R-4
Residential Development District pursuant to the Village Zoning
RIMEMMIM
3. The Village and Corporate Authorities represent that
prior to the execution of this Agreement, all appropriate public
notices have been made and public hearings held on the provisions
of this Agreement by the requisite hearing bodies of the village
and those bodies have forwarded their findings and recommendations
to the Corporate Authorities.
- 3 -
4. Immediately after the public hearings described in
Paragraph 3 and after the execution of this Agreement, the
Corporate Authorities shall cause to be adopted an amendment to the
Zoning Map of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, zoning
and classifying the Subject Property, in the R-4 Residential
Development District.
5. Upon execution of this Agreement, the Corporate
Authorities shall sign a Consent to Permanent Injunction
("Consent") in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Such Consent
shall, among other things:
a. Permit the Court in case number 87 CH 3393 to enter
a permanent injunction against the Village and
Corporate Authorities prohibiting them from
interfering with the Owner and Beneficiary's and
their successors' and assigns' right to erect,
construct or maintain a garage building for storage
of motor vehicles, a parking lot, and a residence
on the Subject Property (as modified by the
provisions of this Agreement which shall be
incorporated therein);
b. Not require the Court to make any findings against
the Village and Corporate Authorities or in favor
of the Owner and Beneficiary;
C. Provide that each party shall bear its own costs in
case number 87 CH 3393; and
d. Otherwise provide for the dismissal with prejudice
of case number 87 CH 3393, subject to the Court's
retaining jurisdiction to enforce the permanent
injunction.
6. The parties further agree that the Consent shall be
construed by the parties to also permit the following use of the
Subject Property and any present and future improvements thereon,
- 4 -
for the erection, construction, and maintenance of a garage
building with offices, day-care or nursery facilities, a vehicle
washing facility, and for parking, service and maintenance of motor
vehicles (as defined by Section 1-146) of the Illinois Vehicle Code
(Chapter 95-1/2, Illinois Revised Statutes, 1989), provided that
the uses and construction of improvements in connection therewith
shall be limited by the following:
a. A day-care or nursery facility must comply with any
and all applicable state and county codes, rules and
regulations, and the plans for said facility are in
accordance with the plans previously submitted to
the Village by the Owner and approved by the
Village;
b. A vehicle wash to be provided for said facility must
be in compliance with any applicable federal and/or
state codes and be in accordance with the plans
previously submitted to the Village by the Owner and
approved by the Village; and
C. Parking, vehicle washing, service and maintenance
of motor vehicles must be limited to the Owner's or
its successors' or assigns' fleet service
operations; provided, however, that this shall
expressly not include the following: a drop-off or
distribution center for the delivery or pick-up of
goods not used in the owner's or its successors' or
assigns' trade or business; cartage services with
loads in excess of 32,000 pounds; and motor vehicles
of tractor/semi-trailer type.
7. The Village represents that municipal sanitary sewers to
serve the Subject Property in accordance with the uses permitted
under the terms of this Agreement are located along the west side
of South Busse Road. The Village further represents that a
municipal water main to serve the Subject Property is presently
- 5 -
located along the west side of South Busse Road. The Village
agrees that the Owner, its successors and assigns may, for the
purpose of serving the Subject Property, connect on to such
municipal facilities under the following terms and conditions:
a. The Owner will pay a sewer connection tap -on fee in
the amount established under the then current
ordinances of the Village;
b. The Owner shall grant the Village a twenty foot
easement located at the rear of the Subject Property
for the purpose of the Village installing a 12 inch
class 56 water main and fire hydrant to loop the
municipal water system (the owner and Village shall
agree to equally share the costs of this
installation);
C. The Owner shall extend at its cost water mains on
its property to connect to the municipal water main;
and
d. The Owner will pay all tap -on fees, water meter
rental fees, connection fees, and water consumption
and sewer usage fees for water and sewers and at the
rates established at the date hereof and from time
to time as may be amended by the ordinances of the
Village.
8. The Village will not require the Owner to install any
fire hydrants on the interior of the Subject Property, except that
automatic sprinkler equipment approved by the Village shall be
installed and maintained in the proposed day-care or nursery
facility; provided, further, that if there is any future
intensification of the uses of the Subject Property, including but
not limited to, by remodeling, expansion or construction of new
structures (other than the day-care or nursery facility and vehicle
wash), then the Owner shall install and maintain fire hydrants on
- 6 -
the Subject Property in accordance with the Fire Prevention Code
of the Village.
. 9. The Village will not require the Owner to pave any
additional portions of the Subject Property except as follows:
a. The Owner shall maintain and repair existing paved
surfaces to a: reasonably smooth and usable standard;
and
b. As provided in the expansion plans as presented by
Owner and approved by the Village for a vehicle
wash.
10. The Owner shall landscape the Subject Property as shown
on Exhibit B attached hereto. The Owner shall have the
responsibility to maintain and, if required, replace said
landscaping.
11. The Village agrees not to impose any additional
requirements or regulations on the existing underground storage
tanks on the Subject Property in addition to those required from
time to time by other governmental bodies or agencies. The Owner
represents that said underground storage tanks are presently in and
will be maintained'in compliance with state and federal laws and
such regulations as may be promulgated from time to time by
governmental bodies or agencies having jurisdiction in such
matters.
12. The Village will not require the Owner to record a plat
of subdivision of the Subject Property.
- 7 -
13. -Immediately after the passage of the ordinance rezoning
the Subject Property, the Corporate Authorities shall cause to be
adopted an amendment to Chapter 17 "Vehicle Licenses" of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, establishing a uniform
license fee for all school buses of Ten Dollars ($10.00) per bus.
The Corporate Authorities shall reserve the right to amend this
amount from time to time as conditions warrant, provided that no
amendment shall be effective until May 1, 1995.
14. The Village agrees that the height and design of the
perimeter fences surrounding the Subject Property as they exist as
of the date of this Agreement are acceptable and shall not require
any variances to be obtained.
15. All provisions, conditions, and regulations set forth in
this Agreement and the Exhibits to which it refers supersede all
Village ordinances, codes and regulations to the extent of any
conflict therewith and as they may apply to the Subject Property.
In all other instances, the Village ordinances, codes and
regulations shall apply and control.
16. This Agreement shall be binding upon and for the benefit
of the parties hereto, their respective grantees, successors and
assigns.
17. Upon a breach of this Agreement, any of the parties in
any court of competent jurisdiction, by any action or proceeding
at law or in equity, may secure the specific performance of the
covenants and agreements herein contained, may be awarded damages
for failure of performance or both, or may obtain rescission and
disconnection for repudiation or material failure of performance.
Before any failure of any party to this Agreement to perform its
obligations under this Agreement shall be deemed to be a breach of
this Agreement, the party claiming such failure shall notify, in
writing, the party alleged to have failed to perform the alleged
failure and shall demand performance. No breach of this Agreement
may be found to have occurred if performance has commenced to the
satisfaction of the complaining party within twenty-one (21) days
of the receipt of such notice. In the absence of any breach by the
Village, the Owner waives its right to seek disconnection from the
Village.
18. The parties agree that this Agreement and any Exhibits
attached hereto may be amended only by mutual consent of the
parties, by the adoption of an ordinance or resolution of the
Village approving said amendment, as provided by law, and the
execution of said amendment by the parties or their successors in
interest.
19. Immediately after the passage of the ordinance rezoning
the Subject Property and the entry of the Consent, the Parties
shall stipulate to and dismiss with prejudice as to each other
(each party to bear its own costs) the lawsuits captioned Cook
County School Bus, Inc. v. County gf Cook, et al., No. 87 CH 3393,
except for the Court's retaining jurisdiction to enforce the
permanent injunction, and First Np_tional Bank of Mount Prospect,
s Trustee Under In2st Agimement dated Decembgr 22. 1977 and Known
as TrUst No. LT -1 094, et al.. v. Village of Mount Prospect, et al,,
87 CH 5503 now pending in the Circuit. Court of Cook County,
Illinois, County Department, Chancery Division, and sign a mutual
release in the form attached hereto as Exhibit C.
20. Except as hereinafter expressly provided, this Agreement
supersedes all prior agreement, negotiations and exhibits and is
a full. integration of the entire agreement of the parties.
21. If any provision, covenant, agreement or portion of this
Agreement or its application to any person, entity or property is
held invalid, such invalidity shall not affect the application or
validity of any other provisions, covenants or portions of this
Agreement and to that end, any such invalid provision, covenant,
agreement or portion of this Agreement is declared to be severable.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Corporate Authorities and the Owner
and Beneficiary have hereunto set their hands and seals, and have
caused this instrument to be executed by their duly authorized
officials and the corporate seal affixed hereto, all on the day and
year first above written.
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
By
Village President
- 10 -
BEVERLY BANK, as Trustee Under
Trust Agreement Dated September 10,
1968 and known as Trust No. 8-1551
By
ATTEST:
COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC., an
Illinois corporation
IM
ATTEST:
VWL/
8/30/91
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING A SETTLEMENT WITH
COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC. IN CASE NO. 87 CH 3393
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is currently a party in a
pending lawsuit in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois
entitled Cook County Sghool Bus, Inc. v. County
-of Coo
et al
No. 87 CH 3393, and in a pending appeal entitled First NatiQnal
Bank of XQ= Prospect, et al. v, Village of Mount Prospect, gt
al., No. 90-3699, both involving Cook County School Bus, Inc. or
the land trust in which its property in the Village is located; and
WHEREAS, Cook County School Bus, Inc. and the Village of Mount
Prospect have determined that it is in their mutual best interests
to resolve the issues raised by said lawsuits; and
WHEREAS, some of the parties to said lawsuits have arrived at an
understanding resolving all of the matters at issue therein and
said understanding has been memorialized in a Settlement Agreement
attached to this Resolution as Exhibit "All; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount
Prospect has conducted the required public hearings pursuant to
notice and has made its affirmative recommendation to the Corporate
Authorities as required by the Settlement Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Village Clerk be directed to
execute for and on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect the
Settlement Agreement in the form attached hereto as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That in furtherance and in compliance with the terms
of the settlement Agreement the Corporate Authorities agree to take
such other action as may be required by said Settlement Agreement
from time to time to effectuate the terms thereof.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1, 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: John F. Dixon, Village Manager WAG
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-49-Z-91, Cook County School Bus, Inc.
LOCATION: 1910 South Busse Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a rezoning application filed by Cook County School Bus, Inc. The applicant is requesting
that the property at 1910 South Busse Road be rezoned from R -X Single -Family Residential
District to R-4 Residential Development District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting, Michael Collins, attorney for the applicant, presented testimony in support of
the request. Mr. Collins explained that the rezoning request was part of an overall
Settlement Agreement between Cook County School Bus, Inc. and the Village of Mount
Prospect. He noted that the property was involuntarily annexed to the Village and given
a R -X zoning designation which is not consistent with zoning of the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that disconnection litigation
is currently pending for several other properties forcibly annexed to the Village in 1987.
Cook County School Bus, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement with the Village to
avoid the pending litigation. The proposed rezoning to R-4 is part of the agreement.
Mr. Clements explained that the R-4 zoning would be consistent with surrounding
properties, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In addition, the property is not suited
to its current R -X zoning designation•
Arthur Holtzman, attorney representing the Village, further explained that the proposed R-
4 zoning is in the best long-term interest of the Village. The current use by the applicant
could continue as a legal non -conforming use.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Some concerns and questions arose
regarding the continued non -conforming status of the existing school bus use under the
proposed R-4 zoning. It was noted that R-4 zoning is compatible with the surrounding
properties and the Comprehensive Plan. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the request to rezone 1910 South Busse Road from R-
X Single -Family Residential to R-4 Residential Development District.
JF:cI
4e
, ,
T6 PGA4
!?*A a 44 - Z ---'I I
4d,
9IT&F�L-Ao-4 IPaS
2
�!!.Nf__TFS OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ti -In `NT PROSPEC-17 ZO`,I'G BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO19-Z-91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
PE',TITIONER:
Cook County School Bus, Inc.
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1910 South Busse Road
Pl."BLICATION DATE:
July 9, 1991
REQUEST:
Rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to
R-4 Residential Development
District.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting to rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to R-4 Residential Development
District.
The petitioner, Michael Collins, attorney representing the
petitioner Cook County School Bus, stated that the subject
property was annexed into the Village and zoned R -X. Mr.
Collins stated that there is multi -family and commercial
properties surrounding the Cook County School Bus property.
Mr. Collins stated that R-4 zoning was suggested to be
consistent with the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this is one of a number of properties that was involuntary
annexed into the Village in 1987. Mr. Clements stated that
the other properties are seeking disconnection in court and
these cases are still pending. Mr. Clements stated that Cook
County School Bus would like to construct a day-care center
for their employees and also a vehicle wash. They were
granted a permit for these projects by the County before the
annexation, The Village and Cook County School Bus have
entered a settlement Agreement as an alternative to the
pending litigation. The requested rezoning to R -A is part of
the Agreement. The proposed R-4 zoning will be consistent
with the surrounding land uses and the comprehensive plan.
ZBA-Z-19-91
July 25, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Staff recommends approval of this request.
Mr. Cassidy stated that the existing school bus use
is non -conforming with regard to the R-4 district.
Mr. Clements stated that this will be existing non -conforming
use noting that staff didn't want Industrial zoning of the
property or to amend the R-4 text, to allow a bus I wash. As a
non -conforming use it will be phased out.
Mr, Clements then introduced Mr. Arthur Holtzman, attorney
representing the Village of Mount Prospect. 00(
Mr. Cassidy asked why the proposed rezoning is A in conformance
with the present use.
Mr. Holtzman stated that the first significant step to help
settle the dispute is to grant the rezoning. Mr. Holtzman
stated that, many other properties have filed suit against the
village of Mount ProspectMr. Holtzman stated that certain
rights have been granted to Cook County School Bus in a
consent decree with Cook County. Rezoning to R-4 would be a
greater benefit to the Village and the best interest of all
parties.
The Board then generally discussed the petitioners request an
had no objections. 4
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to rezone from R -X Single Family
Residence to R-4 Residential Development District.
Mr. Pratt moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson�
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIII, CHAIRMAN ffac--
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-49-Z-91
APPLICANT: COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC.
ADDRESS: 1910 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X (existing); R4 (proposed)
LOT SIZE: 4.02 Acres
% COVERAGE: N/A
F-ALRL : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
This application was filed requesting a rezoning of the subject property from an R -X Single
Family District to an R-4 Residential Development District.
COMMEN _DCONCE
TS AN
Summary of application: Cook County School Bus has requested the rezoning to an R-4
District as part of an agreement designed to help settle pending litigation with the Village.
As background, Cook County School Bus was one of a number of properties along South
Busse Road that was annexed to the Village in 1987. Because the corporate limits of the
Village surrounded these properties, the Village passed appropriate ordinances involuntarily
annexing these properties to the Village. For a variety of reasons, these property owners
filed complaints in Cook County Circuit Court challenging the involuntary annexation and
seeking disconnection from the Village. This disconnection litigation is now pending in the
Appellate Court of Illinois.
At the same time, Cook County School Bus has long wanted to construct a day care facility
for their drivers and a vehicle wash for their vehicles. In fact, the Company has a Special
Use approval from Cook County to construct these facilities. Upon annexation to Mount
Prospect in 1987, the property was zoned R -X and the day care facility and vehicle wash
were not permitted with this zoning classification.
In an effort to avoid potentially lengthy and costly litigation, the applicant and Village
negotiated a Settlement Agreement that will remove Cook County School Bus from the'
litigation pending in the Appellate Court, and assure it's annexation to the Village. This
Agreement will allow the Company to construct it's day care facility and vehicle wash as
originally approved, if Cook County School Bus requests a rezoning to the R-4 District, and
other items as found in the Settlement Agreement.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Concerning the rezoning, the R-4
classification would be consistent with multi-faffifly zoning north and south of the site, on
the west side of Busse Road. The R-4 zoning would also be consistent with the multi-
family designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Thus, the rezoning is consistent with the
area. Also, the property is not suited for development with the Single Family R -X District•
With this information, the application meets the required standards of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Q1HEK_YHJA_GT
All Village Departments reviewed the application, and there were no objections or concerns
raised about the R-4 zoning.
The staff would recommend approval of the rezoning as e R-4 classification is consistent
with the area, and meets the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. According to the
Settlement Agreement, Cook County Schaal Bus will be le to construct the vehicle wash
and day care facility, then operate as a legal non -conforming use in the R-4 District. In
addition to the benefit of the proper zoning classification for this property, Cook County
School Bus will withdraw from the disconnect litigation, and dismiss other litigation against
the Village.
VWL/
08/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R -X TO R-4 (RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT
AS IT PERTAINS TO 1910 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
WHEREAS, Cook County School Bus, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as
-Petitioner), has filed an application to rezone the property
commonly known as 1910 South Busse Road (hereinafter referred to
as Subject Property), legally described as follows:
The North 5 acres of the South 25 acres (except the West 210.0
feet thereof and except the East 50.0 feet thereof) of the
Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 22,
Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from R -X (Single Family Residence) to R-4 (Residential Development)
District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 49-Z-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
July, 1991 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been
published in the Mount Prospegt Herald on the 9th day of July,
1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA
49-Z-91 and have determined that the best interests of the Village
of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to
an R-4 (Residential Development) District.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
49-Z-91
Page 2 of 2
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. -Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-50-V-91, GERALD AND THERESA SAURIOL
LOCATION: 1706 LIBERTY COURT
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Gerald and Theresa Sauriol. The applicant is requesting a
variance to Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a zero foot separation between an accessory structure
(pool deck) and primary structure (house) rather than 10 ft. as required by Code. The deck
will be attached to both the house and pool.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 22, 1991.
At the meeting Gerald Sauriol explained that he is proposing to install an above -ground
pool and would like to construct a deck extending from the house to the pool.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that Code currently requires a 10 ft. separation between
accessory structures and primary structures. The proposed deck would connect the house
and pool resulting in no separation. Staff has no objection to the variation, noting that the
pool itself will be 8 ft. from the house.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. By a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board
recommends approval of a variance to Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a zero foot separation
between the house and pool at 1706 Liberty Court. The house and pool will be connected
by a deck.
DMC:hg
FM Ut ILIIK�k " 'f ORDERED
ORDER No. JA27
BV_
MANSJ OUMA- At.
SSENw*#pOmT SOUTH
ROSELLE LLIMOM MD1 n
S"
OF
LOT 22 IN BRENTWOOD, 'BEING A SUGOI VISION OF PART OF THE :EST 1/2 OF THE
S. W. 1/4 OF SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 42 NORTH. RANGEit. EAST OF THE
THIRD
PRINCIPAL MkRIOIAN, IN COOK COUNTY. ILLINOIS.
-1.1 10 Fr crj(srmsfrr 14% Publo -l%"t"Ics
`41 w5
10'rr �-V'Owmf� 4* P'vic Omfr'fs /10.
"MIrm�lMin
777/
q
I lK
cm." of *~)
FOAMS A OU". AS S. -
DATED I
TE
D"' Af.eA 1PR9
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 50-V-91
Hearing Date: August 22, 1991
PETITIONER:
Gerald and Theresa Sauriol
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1706 Liberty Court
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 6, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section 21.902.A
to allow a 13' setback from the
rear property line rather than
15' as required by Code.
Section 14.1102.E to allow 46.3%
lot coverage rather than 45% as
permitted by Code. Section
14.102.B.1 to allow a 0'
separation between an accessory
structure (pool deck) and
primary structure (house)
rather than 10' as required by
Code. The deck will be attached
to the house.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Sections 21.902.A to
allow a 13' setback from the rear property line rather than
15' as required by Code. Section 14.1102.E to allow a 46.3%
lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code. Section
14.102.B.1 to allow a 0' separation between an accessory
structure (pool deck) and primary structure (house) rather
than 10' as required by Code. The deck will be attatched to
the house.
The petitioner, Gerald Sauriol of 1706 Liberty Court,
presented his case stating that he would like to install an
above -ground swimming pool in his backyard. Mr. Sauriol
stated that he originally wanted to put in a 30' pool but has
reduced the size to 211. Mr. Sauriol stated that this size
ZRA-50-V-91
August 22, 1991
Page 2 of 4
would suffice for 4 adults, noting that the next smaller size
would be 15'. Mr. Sauriol also stated that when his home was
built the builder had to receive variations to put it on his
lot because of the size.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that this will be a 21' diameter circular pool.
She stated that this home is in the Brentwood Subdivision
which is a P.U.D. containing several small lots, consequently
this lot has a very shallow rear yard. Underground electric
wires will be located 3' from the house. The pool must be 5'
from the wires, so it will be a minimum of 8' from the house.
This results in a rear yard setback of 13' making it a 21 wLy^'x4io'^,
The variation for the lot coverage is an increase of 1.3%
to accommodate the proposed deck. She noted that the lot is
at the maximum of 45% coverage. She stated that the
petitioners are going to remove one of the existing patios
to off -set the amount of additional lot coverage. Miss
Farnham stated that staff encourages the petitioner to
install a smaller pool that would not require any variations.
Mr. Cassidy questioned the location of the underground
electric.
Miss Farnham stated that the current electric is over -head
and will be relocated underground which will be 3' from the
house. The lines must be 5' from the pool according to the
electrical Code.
Mr. Lannon asked if the pool adds to the impervious surface.
Miss Farnham stated that it does not add to the impervious
surface because it does not add to the run-off but collects
water in the pool.
Mr. Lannon noted that a cover could be on the pool during the
off-season.
Mr. Brettrager noted that there was a concern when these
homes were built that variations would be requested.
Mrs. Theresa Sauriol of 1706 Liberty Court, stated that she
needs these variations to install the pool in her yard.
Chairman Basnik then read a letter from a P.C. Philips of
1705 Independence Ct. stating that his rear yard is adjacent
to the petitioners and he objects to the pool and would like
an 8' fence installed to block his view.
Miss Farnham noted that the letter was written regarding the
ZBA-50-V-91
August 22, 1991
Page 3 of 4
previous request which included a larger pool. The
petitioners have revised their plans for the current request.
Mr. Saviano asked if there are any other pools in the
neighborhood.
Mrs. Sauriol stated that there is another pool two doors
down.
Chairman Basnik stated he does not feel pools should be
excluded from the lot coverage for impervious surface.
Mr. Cassidy stated that no other structures should be allowed
on this lot.
The Board then generally discussed this case.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 21.902.A to allow a 13'
setback from the rear property line rather than 15' as
required by Code and from Section 14.1102.E to allow 46.3%
lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code.
Mr. Pratt moved. Mr. Saviano seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy,
Basnik
NAYS: Brettrager, Skowron
Motion carried by a vote of 5-2.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 0'
separation between an accessory structure (pool deck) and
primary structure (house) rather than 10' as required by
Code.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
RAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Mr. Lannon then moved to prepare resolution *Z-50-91 to
record the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the
petitioners request for a 13' rear yard setback and for 46.3%
ZtA-50-V-91
August 22, 1991
Page 4 of 4
lot coverage.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Saviano seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Mr. Brettrager stated that he had concerns when this
subdivision was created with small lots that many, variations
were going to be requested.
Mr. Cassidy agreed with Mr. Brettrager, but believed that the
individual property owners should not be penalized because
the village approved these smaller lots.
Mrs. Skowron stated that the petitioners purchased a small
lot which limits what can be done to the yards. She is not
convinced that a smaller pool wouldn't meet the petitioners
needs.
Chairman Basnik stated that he feels a pool should be
included in the impervious surface since it is such a large
structure.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W"
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 13, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-50-V-91
APPLICANT: GERALD AND THERESA SAURIOL
ADDRESS: 1706 LIBERTY COURT
LOCATION MAP:
' --) \I—
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 67'x 1151 (7,705 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 45% (existing); 46.3% (proposed)
F -A -R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate installation of an above
ground pool and attached deck:
Section 21.902.A to allow a 12' setback from the rear property line rather than
15' as required by Code.
2. Section 14.1102.E to allow 46.3% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted
by Code.
Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a V separation between an accessory structure
(pool deck) and primary structure (house) rather than 10' as required by Code.
The deck will be attached to the house.
•AMIX34)", 1
Summary or application: The applicant hopes to install a 21 foot diameter above -ground
circular pool in their rear yard. This size pool cannot be placed in the rear yard without
variations. As such, the pool is proposed to be 12 ft. rather than the required 15 ft. from
the rear lot lie. A deck is proposed which is attached to both the pool and the house
resulting in a zero foot separation between principal and accessory structures. The deck
also increases the lot coverage by 1.3% resulting in a total lot coverage of 46.3%.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The lot is located in Brentwood
Subdivision which contains many lots with substandard depth. The applicant's lot is 115 ft.
in length. Standard lot size, as defined by the Zoning Ordinance, is 65'x 125' with an area
of 8,125 sq. ft.
Engineering requires that a grading plan be submitted for review. Because the rear yard
slopes, some grade alterations may be required to create a level surface for the pool. No
fill can be placed in the 10 ft. utility easement along the rear property line.
U_MMARXLR_LCQMM_LLN_DA_TI QN
Staff notes that the applicant's lot is shorter than the standard 125 ft. length, and smaller
in area than a standard lot (7,705 sq. ft. vs. 8,125 sq. ft.). These factors contribute to the
need for variations.
Staff has no major objection to the lot coverage variation which is relatively minor given the
size of the lot. Regarding the setback variation, the applicant should address the necessity
of a:21 ft. diameter pool rather than 19 ft. diameter pool which would not require a setback
variation. In a newer subdivision, such as Brentwood, it would be better if a pool could be
installed without any setback variations.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
Staff notes that the applicant is also requesting a variance to reduce the required separation
between the pool and the house. As proposed, the pool will be connected to the house by
a deck. The width of the proposed deck between the pool and the house is 8 ft. Staff notes
that a 19 ft. diameter pool, 8 feet from the house, would result in a rear yard 15 ft. deep,
which wouldn't need a setback variation. While the requested setback variation is relatively
minor, staff suggests that the applicant consider a slightly smaller pool size to eliminate the
rear yard variation.
Regardless of the location of the pool, construction of the deck results in a slight increase
in lot coverage. The lot is currently built to the maximum 45% lot coverage required by
Code. This is primarily due to the substandard size of the lot. Consequently, any additional
lot coverage requires a variation. Staff notes that an existing patio will be removed and the
deck will be constructed over part of another patio. However, lot coverage will be increased
by 1.3 % for a total of 46.3%.
The applicant's rear yard slopes toward the rear lot line and from west to east. The pool
is proposed to be located on the lower, more level area of the rear yard.
The required 10 ft. setback from the side lot line will be provided. Staff notes that the lot
is not fenced. To comply with Building Code safety requirements, the applicant can either
fence the yard or install security fencing around the top of the pool as stipulated in the
Building Code.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 27, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-53-V-91, ROMAN AND JOAN MALYSZKO
LOCATION: 1109 BRENTWOOD LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Roman and Joan Malyszko. The applicant is requesting a
variation to Section 14.102.13.2 to allow reconstruction of a detached garage 3' 4" from the
side lot line. Code requires a 5' setback.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 22, 1991.
At the meeting, Roman Malyszko presented testimony in support of the request. He stated
that he purchased this house thirty years ago and the garage has always been in the location
of the existing foundation. The garage burned down in 1988 but the foundation is still
sound. He hopes to reconstruct the garage on the existing foundation.
Rita Tungare, Planning Intern, explained that the foundation is considered existing non-
conforming in terms of the 3'-4" setback. However, when more than 50% of a non-
conforming structure is reconstructed, it must meet the current codes. Code requires a 5
ft. setback for a detached garage. She noted that staff observed several other detached
garages with non -conforming setbacks in the neighborhood. Consequently, this variation
would not alter the character of the neighborhood. She also noted that the existing
foundation would have to be relocated to eliminate the variation.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that this neighborhood has several
non -conforming garages. Accordingly, by a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals
recommends approval of a variation to allow reconstruction of a garage 3'-4" from the side
lot line at 1109 Brentwood Lane.
DMC:hg
.
740
SITE �a
OAW oor "r
X
i G P -A
y
109
." GeAs,r
5 Ide. w m L.W-
.
740
SITE �a
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. Z-53-91 Hearing Date: August 22, 1991
PETITIONER: Roman and Joan Malyszko
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1109 Brentwood Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 1991
REQUEST: Variation from Section
14.102.8.2 to allow
reconstruction of a detached
garage 3' 4" from the side lot
line.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano .
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.B.2
to allow reconstruction of a detached garage 31 4" from the
side lot line. Code requires a 5' setback.
The petitioner, Roman Malyszko of 1109 Brentwood, presented
his case by stating that when his garage was built he was in
Wheeling Township and received a permit to build. Mr.
Malyszko stated that a fire destroyed the garage except the
existing slab. He stated that he would like to build a new
garage on the existing slab which is 3' 4" from the side lot
line.
Rita Tungare, Planning Intern for the Village of Mount
Prospect, stated that the petitioner would like to
reconstruct a detached garage on a existing slab. She stated
that the previous garage which was there for 25 years was
destroyed by a fire and the hardship would be to remove the
existing slab which could be quite expensive. Miss Tungare
stated that the adjacent neighbor has a detached garage with
a 5' setback however staff observed many properties in the
neighborhood have detached garages with less than 5'
setbacks. Miss Tungare stated that staff supports the
petitioners request.
Z'BA-53-V-91
August 22, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Cassidy stated that he has no problem with ''the
reconstruction considering it was built under the Wheeling
Township. He stated that he is familiar with the neighborhood
and knows that several garages do not meet ourlCode setback
requirements.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 14.102.B.2 to !allow
reconstruction of a detached garage 3' 4" fromlthe side lot
line.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson'
Recording Secretary
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
AUGUST 13, 1991
ZBA-53-V-91
ROMAN AND JOAN MALYSZKO
1109 BRENTWOOD LANE
rg
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 8,875 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 40.5%
F-A—R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.102.8.2 to allow reconstruction of a
detached garage 3' 4" from the side lot line. Code requires a 5' setback.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing reconstruction of a detached garage
in the rear yard, on an existing sound foundation slab, to replace a garage which was totally
destroyed by fire in November 1988. The proposed garage will be in the same location as
the previous garage had been for over 25 years. The existing foundation slab is 3'-4" from
the side lot line. The proposed garage will therefore be at a 3'-4" setback from the side lot
line rather than a 5 ft. setback as required by Code. According to the applicant, locating
the garage at a 5 ft. setback from the side lot line will present the hardship of removing and
replacing the existing foundation slab, which would be considerably expensive and maybe
financially prohibitive.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The adjacent residence has a
detached garage in the rear yard at approximately 5 ft. from the common side lot line
between the two properties. Since the neighboring garage is adjacent to the proposed
garage, it appears that the proposed 3'-4" setback will not prove to be a problem to the
neighbor.
Staff has observed that, in the neighborhood, there were quite a few properties with
detached garages in the rear yards at setbacks less than 5 ft. from the side lot lines. The
proposed garage will, therefore, not have an adverse impact on the neighborhood, and will
be quite in character with the surrounding area.
THER VILLAGE STME COMMENTS
No objections were expressed by other staff. inspection Services suggests that an architect
or structural engineer should certify that the existing foundation is structurally sound and
has not been damaged by fire or weather.
SUMMARYMCOMMENDATION
The proposed garage setback of 3'-4" will provide enough space for maintenance and
drainage purposes along the north side of the proposed garage.
Staff notes that the existing foundation slab appears to be in sound condition and believes
that replacing the existing foundation slab in order to meet the Code requirements will be
expensive and impractical.
Since the garage had been existing in the same location for over 25 years, and did not
present any hazard or alter the character of the neighborhood, the proposed variation will
not be a problem to the neighborhood.
Based on all these concerns, the Planning and Zoning Department recommends approval
of the variance requested.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
AUGUST 27, 1991
SUBJECT:
ZBA-54-V-91, MICHAEL MACELI.A, SR.
LOCATION:
6 SOUTH HI LUSI AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Michael Macella, Sr. The applicant is requesting a variation
to Section 14,3016.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 28 ft. at the widest point.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 22, 1991.
At the meeting, Michael Macella, Sr. presented testimony in support of the request. He
stated that he hopes to construct a new two -car garage in the back comer of his rear yard.
His existing garage is very close to the house and has a driveway that is too shallow to park
a car on. The new garage location would open up the center of his yard and provide a
driveway depth of 18 ft. He wants to create an 8 ft. wide parking pad along the side of the
new garage and the driveway must widen out to 28 ft. to allow access to the pad. He felt
that a parking pad would have less impact than constructing a three -car garage.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the applicant's lot is very narrow (43 ft.) which only
allows space for a relatively shallow driveway. The proposed parking pad provides a place
to park without blocking the garage. Staff notes that the lot coverage is below the maximum
allowed. Staff believes that this proposal is an improvement to the property.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that the overall site plan improves
the property. Accordingly, by a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
approval of a variance to allow a driveway of 28 ft. at the widest point, tapering to 23'-6"
where it meets the alley, as shown on the site plan submitted.
lvluylelir�
Aj Z -X JL N -f AL U.0 L/ ice/ v — —
SIEVERTSEN SURVEY SERVICE INC
21S Souro4 Aj%t AVENUE
ARUNGTOM MkIGMIS MUMOIS 60006
OF
Lot 228 In H. Roy Barry :Qap&ny-3 Colonial Manor, being & Subaivi-ion of part of the Northah4t 1/4
of U*ction 11 and pert of tta Northeast i4. of section 12, all In 'Township 41 North, Range 11. East
� Meridian, in Cook County. lllinos.
of the Third Fri cipal
sr
j
Ag 03
Illinois i7 ss
Tmtv of cook
v
'wl
4
'4-fz'
Ay
Ag 03
Illinois i7 ss
Tmtv of cook
v
-alqusn ajow
4T aNvm pus piul siq ja4uao aM4 do uado PTnom goiMm 9,gvjuV
MaU V NUTPTTnq OR o4 XuToX sT jauoTqT49d aqq qvq4 pa4v4s
qoadsoid junoW JO 9VvTTTA aq4 JOJ d9uuvTd 'WUqUJUa aTTnr
-q4jou aq4 of uado pTnom Aaqq P94v4s vTT9OvW *JW
-uado PTnom loop aRvauX aq4 ajaMm paNsu NTusys uvmaluqo
',TUTUaaJDS JOJ
SU90J8JaAa TT94 oV-,0£ suq aR S4jadoid STR JO apTS qqnos
9ql uo lvq4 P9494B aH -pvd VUTNjvd aRq oq 49V uuo aq os 8Z
aq o4 AVt4aATJP aq4 JO q4PTM aq4 JOJ ST UOTqUTJUA 8ql *VUTNjvd
TIBUOT.4'
TPPV PaP99u-OR4 94vPOMM0009 PTnom pvd FuiNjud aq4
49ql P94v4s aH *RuTNavd s4TqT-qojd 40'Mm SaTTU US UO saATT
aq 4uRq Pa4v4s 9TT90UN -jW -A�jadojd sTg uo savo adorn u -i
paiTnsai SUR STq4 PUU MTq q4TM XUIATT ST4uajjno ads squalled
STM 4UR4 P94V4S aH -a2ujuX jvo-om4 v q4Tm S4jadoid sTR
uo awujua agq aouTdai 04 8UTO8 Sl aq 4UR4 2WT4V4S RSUO SIR
pa4uasaid TsnqTH 'S 9 JO -JS 9TTa0vW T9940TN ljauoT4Tqad aql
, , IZ jo qjpTm mnWTXVUI V sqTuijad
apoo -4uTod qsapTm 9R4 4e g8Z JO RIPTM ARM9ATJP v mOTTv 04
CIV*910CIVI UOT409S MOJJ UOIqVTJVA V VUTqsanbaj ST j@uoT4T4ad
aq4 4UM4 VUT4U4S 98U0 ST44 paonpojqUT NTUBVH UUWJTUqo
OUON:Sailavd aHlsaHHINI/sz101DHfaO
9UON :lNasav
OUVTAVS STUUaa
UOJMONS OTORMOTIJ
j98vj449jg qjaqoH
APTSBUD PTVu0H
44vid pavqola
uouuvq J04ad
uumjTvqo 4XTusua qjaqTTO
—4UTod
IsaPTM 9q4 49 89 JO q4pTm
IgMaAIJP S MOTTV 04 VV -9T0£ -VT
U01409S MOJJ UOTqVTJUA
T661 19 qsnonV
TsnqTH qqnoS 9
-JS UTTaDVW T9vqDTW
1661 `ZZ 4snWnv :a4vG PuTlvaH
:lNasaad saaawaw
:Isanoas
:HIVG NOIIVDIqHfld
:AIHHdOUd IDHfUnS
:HHNOIIIIHd
16 -A -V9 'ON HSVJ V9Z
SqVgddV aO GHVO9 DNINOZ 1OHdSONd INnOW
alll 30 DNIIHHW HVqnDHH HHI 30 SaInNIN
The proposed garage will be locat
setbacks. Miss Farnham stated th
several vehicles and would like a
three -car garage. She suggested
to 21' where it abuts the alley.
this would be an improvement to t
request.
The Board then generally discusso
objections.
Chairman Basnik then entertained
petitioners request from Section
driveway width of 28' at the widf
*1.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Savian(
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Sad
Brettrager
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This case must still be heard be:
mie'l
ZBA-54-V-91
August 22, 1991
Page 2 of 2
ed at the required 5'
at the petitioner has
wider driveway instead of a
that the driveway be tapered
Miss Farnham stated that
he property and supports the
d the case and felt no
a motion to grant the
14.3016.A.3 to allow a
st point as shown on Exhibit
seconded.
fano, Pratt, Cassidyt
Skowron, Basnik
ore the Village Board.
elle Thompson
ding Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ncl-
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 13, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-54-V-91
APPLICANT: MICHAEL MACELLA, SR.
ADDRESS: 6 SOUTH HI LUSI AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 41.9'x 155.6' (6,513 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 40.3%
F.A.R. : N/A
4-91=0
q1111 I
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a driveway width of
28 ft. at the widest point. Code permits a maximum width of 21 ft.
Raw
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a new detached two -car
garage in his rear yard. He also hopes to install a. driveway that varies in width from 28 ft.
to 23%6". The widened driveway will provide access to a proposed parking pad along the
side of the new garage.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential impact: The applicant's lot is substandard
in width and area. The lot is 43 ft. wide at the rear lot line which limits the depth of a new
driveway. Locating the garage to provide the required 5 ft. setbacks only leaves 18 feet for
the driveway. This is the minimum depth of a parking stall as defined by the Zoning
Ordinance. This lot also fronts on an alley with no parkway between private property and
the alley thoroughfare. This results in a very tight parking situation to avoid vehicles
overhanging the alley. To eliminate the need to park in front of the garage, the applicant
is proposing to construct an 8 ft. wide parking pad on the east side of the new garage. To
access this pad, the driveway must be widened to 28 feet. The driveway is also proposed
to taper to 23'-6" where it abuts the alley. Staff suggests that the driveway be tapered to 21
feet where it meets the alley.
The existing garage will be removed upon completion of the new garage. The existing patio
will be removed and replaced with another patio of different dimensions. Staff notes that
the lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed on this lot. The new garage location
also creates more usable yard area near the house.
W� � �Wy 41,01mmm
No major concerns were expressed by other Village staff. Engineering and Inspection
Services note that a grading plan must be submitted for review as part of the permit process.
Staff has no major objections to the driveway width variation requested. Creating a parking
pad along the side of the garage will eliminate the need to parking in the driveway, which
is minimal in depth, and could result in vehicles overhanging into the alley. Staff notes that
the lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed on this small lot. Staff recommends
that approval of this request be conditioned upon:
Tapering the driveway to 21 feet where it abuts the alley.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
AUGUST 27, 1991
SUBJECT:
ZBA-56-V-91, FRANK SCHALLMOSER
LOCATION:
2020 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Frank Schallmoser. The applicant is requesting the following
variations to accommodate two overhead gas pump canopies at 2020 East Euclid Avenue.
1. Section 14.2102.A to allow a front yard setback of 3.75' rather than 30' as required
by Code.
2. Section 14.2102.13 to allow an exterior side yard setback of 4.25' rather than 30' as
required by Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 22, 1991.
At the meeting, Cary Chickerneo, Attorney for the applicant, explained that his client is
proposing to construct canopies over the existing gas pumps to provide weather protection
for customers. The canopy supports will be at the same setbacks as the pump islands. He
also stated that the color of the canopies will coordinate with the color scheme of the rest
of the gas station.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the gas station is currently non -conforming in terms of
lot coverage and pump island setbacks. The canopies will not increase the lot coverage.
She explained that the only way to eliminate the variations would be to relocate the pumps
and potentially the underground tanks. She noted that the canopies will be 15 ft. above
grade and should not obstruct visibility. Staff believes that the canopies will help upgrade
the facility and benefit customers by providing weather protection.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that the gas station across Euclid
Avenue had similar canopies at reduced setbacks. Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning
Board of Appeals recommends approval of front and exterior sideyard setback variations
to accommodate construction of two overhead gas pump canopies at 2020 East Euclid
Avenue.
DMC:hg
till�
■
< t
�ri�t wai
..t# �tl .at#t..r taaw.> �wa#y mtaN r a.aaiw r
t t LM a#i. Nttt#. [#wt tar Y+ir at}�-a ,�trsae.'
4 (t� 1acMa.
TV ct[cactvt aMit wt al! a.c►[a Mlu ta.WtN. Yl<v taal! !{ tb N� .
ahwu .[ taaul[N rt wil M t[ HtY tY at N . tat lata.
I rM c+vttu[et w11 t.—*. W "a—u eetaf na#p
- yalt M ecaN b. Ntntta: r iill� aaae# vaatMl ##. YN
- I"0" atvvat tett[.. hi#ua wtt Y litaa t #vut wv.ag-lsg t—wr #�
� llt wll !y aatatalr aiM tet[M[, t
- tnuc�uw. sna
,ul .tructar.l at..l tapltN wu M .att t a -a#. Ya#a. +all rY� ..
tae..[ atu wtuwitm. res. qtr. to M M !aw a -70M.
Y Or
1) .
PLAT OF c-.-J'RVEY
(W
10, 1 "1 =gnu- U., WSW,"'m or of I IN
amm Cw I -W "Mrs w rw
Own71
#,o IlSIMs-1,-=, "Jo"s, welollm, Acco"Jom "* p"I "Voo
Aco"'D ooctwwf *ME#
3 Cam toortr—TErTmaTs-
VA I
SITE p�
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 56-V-91 Hearing Date: August 22, 1991
PETITIONER: Frank Schallmoser
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2020 E. Euclid Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 1991
REQUEST: Variations from Section
14.2102.A to allow a front yard
setback of 3.75' rather than 30'
as required by code. Section
14.2102.B to allow an exterior
side yard setback of 4.25'
rather 301 as required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano,
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations to accommodate two
overhead gas pump canopies from Section 14.2102.A to allow a
front yard setback of 3.75' rather than 301 as required by
Code. Also, from section 14.2102.B to allow an exterior side
yard setback of 4.25' rather than 30' as required by Code.
The petitioner, Cary Chickerneo, attorney for the petitioner,
presented the case stating that his client would like to
install two overhead canopies. The supports would be at the
same setbacks as the existing gas pumps. Mr. Chickerneo
stated that the canopies will be 15' above grade and made
from galvanized metal which is standard for most overhead gas
pump canopies. Mr. Chickerneo stated that this will also
benefit the customers to protecting them from bad weather.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that there will be no additional lot coverage. Miss
Farnham stated that staff does not believe this will cause a
visibility problem noting that there will be a 15' clearance
height. The fascia will be a 3' wide band, color coordinated
with the rest of the property. Miss Farnham stated that this
ZBA-56-V-91
August 22, 1991
Page 2 of 2
will be an improvement to the property and noted they couldIr,6T
place canopies on this property without variations.
Mr. Lannon stated that the Shell Station across the street
has similar canopies
Mr. Saviano asked if the material used is galvanized.
Miss Farnham stated that it is and is the standard material
used.
Mr. Brettrager noted that used cars are sold out of this lot.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 14.2102.A to allow a front
yard setback of 3.75' and from Section 14.2102.B to allow an
exterior sideyard setback of 4.251.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 13, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-56-V-91
APPLICANT: FRANK SCHALLMOSER
ADDRESS: 2020 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
111114 V IlroWNu n. 31
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-4 Business, Retail and Service
LOT SIZE: 122' x 143' (17,446 sq. S.)
% COVERAGE: No change - existing non -conforming
FA- R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board o Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate canopies for two gas
pump islands:
1. Section 14.2102.A to allow a front yard setback of 3.75' rather than 30' as required
by Code.
2. Section 14.2102.8 to allow an exterior side yard setback of 4.25' rather than 30' as
required by Code.
REMUNUM _m"KOXXOt �
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing, to construct canopies over the existing
gas pump islands at 2020 East Euclid Avenue. The location of the existing pumps dictates
the location of the canopy. While the canopy supports are proposed to be located at the
same setbacks as the pump islands, the edge of the canopies will extend much closer to the
lot lines.
As proposed, one canopy will be located 3.75 ft. from the front lot line along East Euclid
Avenue. The other canopy will be located 4.225 ft. from the exteelor side lot line along
River Road. In both locations, Code requires structures to be set back 30 feet.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: This gas station is an existing non-
conforming property in several respects, including lot coverage and setbacks. The lot is
almost entirely paved so the proposed canopies will not contribute to additional lot
coverage. The existing pump islands do not meet the current 30 ft, setback requirement.
The pump island near the East Euclid Avenue entrance is about 12 ft. from the lot line and
the island facing River Road is only set back 15 feet.
The support columns for the canopies will be at these same setbacks. As such, the columns
should not pose a problem for visibility. In addition, the bottom of the canopies will be 15
ft. above the pavement grade.
'The overall height of the canopies will be 18 ft. The canopy itself will consist of a 3 ft.
galvanized metal facia. The color of the facia should coordinate with the color scheme of
the gas station. In addition, signage on the facia may require approval by the Sign Review
Board.
No comments or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
W IUV MATTO XK$13 IM W
The proposed canopies are intended to upgrade the gas station facility and provide weather
protection for customers. The only way to eliminate the variations would be to relocate the
pump islands so the canopies could be constructed at the required setback. This is not a
reasonable alternative. Staff has no objections to the variances requested noting that the
canopy and supports will not create visibility problems which would negatively impact the
safety of vehicle access into and out of the gas station. The 15 foot clearance between the
pavement and the bottom of the canopy and the distance of the canopies from abutting
property lines, should ensure that visibility to neighboring properties is maintained.
103
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
AUGUST 27, 1991
SUBJECT:
ZBA-59-SU-91, WALGREEN COMPANY
LOCATION:
1010 MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use application filed by Walgreen Company. The applicant is requesting a Special
Use permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna
at 1010 Mount Prospect Plaza.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 22, 1991.
At the meeting, Robert Silverman, Attorney for Walgreen Company, explained that
Walgreen's is proposing to install a 6 ft. diameter satellite antenna on the roof of their store
in Mount Prospect Plaza. The antenna is needed to link this store with Walgreen's
nationwide prescription service. He indicated that the antenna would be screened on all
sides.
Testimony was also presented by Ted Raszbasan, Manager of satellite installation for
Walgreen Company. Mr. Raszbasan explained that the proposed 6 ft. diameter antenna is
the smallest antenna available to accommodate the proposed use. He also indicated that
the antenna would not interfere with television reception or other electrical devices.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that non -ground mounted satellite antennas are permitted
as Special Uses in the B-3 Zoning District. She explained that the proposed antenna meets
all the standards listed in the Code pertaining to roof -mounted antennas including screening,
size, and height.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request noting that all the standards
for roof -mounted satellite antennas have been met. Accordingly, by a vote of 7-0, the
Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a Special Use permit to install a 6 ft.
diameter roof -mounted satellite dish at Walgreens, 1010 Mount Prospect Plaza.
`sem w Au. COAMONOW TO a YW,
__Eo _hj VOMFW by 0OWPA"
WALGREENS� 7,-4-7
ANTENNA L
471
�V' Z x,9",.1
WALGRMS' ANTENNA
HIr 1T'94&A_zr O"U
DO
RIVA KLEIN & PARTNERS
-5°i-i 5 4- a I
1 •w�
SCREEN ISOMETRIC VIEW
Ole n-tTlf-
PRM/NPM FRAME DETAIL
:. A
SCREEN PLAN
iN�h/ bL POP. 4c rzrotp Gt6ToILH)
a
MINUTEN OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 59 -SU -91 Hearing Date: August 22, 1991
PETITIONER: Walgreen Company
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1010 Mount Prospect Plaza
PUBLICATION DATE: August 6, 1991
REQUEST: A Special Use permit per Section
14.2001.C.5 to allow
installation of a roof mounted
satellite antenna.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Sam Listopad of 107 N. Westgate
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a Special Use permit per Section
14.2001.C.5 to allow installation of a roof -mounted satellite
antenna.
The petitioner, Robert Silverman, senior attorney for
Walgreen Company, presented his case stated that they would
like to install a roof top satellite antenna to integrate
this store into Walgreens nationwide prescription service.
Mr. Silverman stated that this allow pharmacists to fill a
prescription in any other stag and is also for in store
management. He noted that Walgreens is a national chain and
this helps them to help customers with fast efficient
service. He stated that this is the smallest size dish at 61
in diameter and this will not interfere with neighbors TV's,
radios or police radios. The dish will also be screened on
all four sides.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitioner is proposing to install a 6'
diameter satellite antenna on the roof. This property is
located near a high-rise Senior Citizen apartment complex,
Centennial Apartments, which is located directly north of
Walgreen's. A primary concern is the view of the satellite
antenna by residents of upper floor apartments. The proposed
ZEA -59 -SU -91
August 22, 1991
Page 2 of 2
satellite antenna meets the standards for non -ground mounted
antennas. The antenna will be located inside a four-sided box
for screening. The sides of the screen will consist of solid
metal siding painted a cream color to match the color of the
antenna. Staff believes that the proposed antenna and
screening box will be less objectionable than other, existing
utility fixtures on the shopping center roof.
Sam Listopad of 107 N. Westgate, stated that he has concerns
with the main office building of Walgreens located at 1084
Mount Prospect Plaza. He stated ,that they had promised some
things when they first occupied the building and have not
fulfilled the promises. He also stated some concerns about
trucks using Westgate Road.
Chairman Basnik informed Mr. Listopad he should bring his
concerns to the Village Board.
The Board then generally discussed the case and had no
objections.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a Special Use permit per Section
14.2001.C.5 to allow installation of a 6' diameter roof -
mounted satellite antenna.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Lannon «r seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano, Pratt, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This Case must 'still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN wt
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
AUGUST 13, 1991
CASE NO.:
ZBA-59-SU-91
APPLICANT:
WALGREEN COMPANY
ADDRESS:
1010 MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3 Business, Retail and Service
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A.R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting a Special Use permit per Section 14.2001.C.5 to allow
installation of a roof -mounted satellite antenna.
10111dOWMILym
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to install a 6 foot diameter satellite
antenna on the roof of the Walgreen's Store at 1010 Mount Prospect Plaza. The satellite
antenna is needed to link this store to Walgreen's nationwide prescription service. The
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance only permits satellite antennas larger than 40" diameter
as special uses.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Walgreen's is located toward the
west end of Mount Prospect Plaza Shopping Center. A high-rise Senior Citizen Apartment
Complex, Centennial Apartments, is located directly to the north of Walgreen's. A primary
concern is the view of the satellite antenna by residents of upper floor apartments.
The proposed satellite antenna meets the standards for non -ground mounted antennas as
follows:
1. The antenna will be located on the roof above the Walgreen Store to which it is an
accessory.
2. The proposed 6 foot antenna diameter is less than 1/3 the height of the building (20
ft. building height X 3360 = 6.6 ft.).
3. The overall height of the dish including the screening box will be approximately 27.5
ft. Code allows a maximum building height of 30 ft.
4. The antenna will be at least 20 ft. from all property lines.
5. The antenna and screening will be in scale with the building.
6. The antenna will be fully screened from view from adjacent roadways and properties
from ground level.
As proposed, the antenna will be located inside a four-sided box for screening. The sides
of the screen will consist of solid metal siding painted a cream color to match the color of
the antenna. The antenna must be open to the sky to receive signals. As such, the antenna
will be visible form the top to residents of upper -story apartments. However, staff believes
that the proposed antenna and screening box will be less objectionable than other, existing
utility fixtures on the shopping center roof.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
We have received some calls and a letter from neighbors about potential interference with
television transmissions. The applicant should address this issue.
OTH I SIAFF COMMENTS
R VILLAG
No concerns or objections were expressed by other Village staff.
SUMMaYJRECOMMEnA3:JON
Staff has no objections to the Special Use requested to allow a 6 foot diameter roof -
mounted satellite antenna. Staff notes that all the standards for roof -mounted antennas
have been met (e.g. screening; height).
DMC:hg
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Village Manager
Village Clerk
FROM:
Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE:
August 15, 1991
SUBJECT:
Aldi's Food Store
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
/m
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: A DI'S FOOD STORE
LOCATION: 730 E. RAN O
DATE: JULYS 1991
YES no
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: �.
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL f r�
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL _
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS' FOR ACCA'RTANC BY V7CLLAGE
WATER MAIN _N/&— FT. NI SIZE
SANITARY SEWER N/A FT. NZA SIZE
STORM SEWER . _..NL_A_ FT. N/A SIZE
ROADWAYS N/A
SIDEWALKS N/A SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS _ N/A
STREET LIGHTS N/A NZA
PARKWAY TREES N/A NLA..
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING COMPLETE
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS --HLA—
WATER
_N/A,..,._,
WATER MAIN 8" SIZE..
SANITARY SEWER 117' FT " SIZE
STORM SEWER 112'-6t' 1 2 ° -'S°' 1 4 1 -- Q'.'
ROADWAY NZA
PARKING LOTS _ COMM lE Q
LANDSCAPING N/A
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N/A
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS _...DAY OF , 1991.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Village Manager
FROM:
Director of Inspection Services
DATE:
July 25, 1991
SUBJECT:
Detention Ordinance
Per the request of the Village Board a survey was made of surrounding communities
concerning their requirements for storm water detention. Following are the results:
1.) Arlington Heights; All commercial and industrial projects require detention. All
residential projects 5 acres or over, require detention. Projects under 5 acres are
subject to review by the village engineer, and if detention is feasible on the site, it
must be provided. If detention is not feasible for some reason, the developer must
pay into a fund for regional detention areas, such as, the Lake Arlington project.
The current fee is one dollar per cubic feet of required detention.
2.) Schaumburg: All projects - commercial, industrial or residential over 1 acre, require
detention. If the project is in an older, established part of town and it is not feasible
to provide storage, the detention requirement can be waived. Projects less than 1
acre that are in flood prone areas maybe required to provide detention if feasible.
3.) B_ af-fig r ve,� Ordinance requires detention for all projects with no stipulation on
size. However, the policy is - the engineering department reviews each plan to
determine the feasibility of providing detention for smaller projects.
4.) Des Plaines: Their development code follows the MWRD criteria for residential
projects 10 acres or greater and commercial/industrial projects 5 acres and over,
require detention. One exception to this is - projects less than these limits where
existing storm sewers are inadequate to handle the additional runoff these projects
must then have a release rate equal to the capacity of the existing sewer and provide
whatever detention necessary. Also, the building code requires detention for any site
whose impervious area is over 60%.
5.) Park Ridge-, All commercial/industrial sites require detention and all residential
sites over 1 acre, require detention.
6.) Elk Grove Villa= All commercial/industrial sites require detention and residential
sites 5 acres and over, require detention.
DETENTION ORDINANCE
July 25, 1991
For existing commercial/industrial site any increase in impervious area, requires
detention. If a cornmercial/industrial site is to be demolished and rebuilt then
detention is required for the total site.
7.) Hgffman i1tg& Commercial/Industrial projects 1/2 acre or larger require
detention. Residential projects 5 acres or larger, require detention.
A brief history Of OUT detention ordinance is as follows: In the early 1970's the
Metropolitan Sanitary District (MSD) adopted a detention ordinance which all
municipalities within the district were required to follow. This ordinance required detention
for residential project 10 acres and over, and for commercial/industrial project 5 acres and
over. The four main components of the detention calculations were: 1.) acres; 2.) intensity
of rainfall and 3.) amount of runoff and 4.) release rate of storm water. The original MSD
ordinance referenced the rainfall intensity based on the U.S. weather bureau report T.P.
40. The amount of runoff was based on a 100 year, 24 hour, 5.8" rainfall and a runoff
factors 0.15 for grass and 0.90 for impervious surface. The release rate was based on a 3
year storm with a runoff factor of 0.15 for the total site.
In the mid 1970's the village adopted its own detention ordinance. This ordinance
was basically the MSD ordinance with two differences. The village ordinance required the
volume of detention as calculated by the MSD ordinance be increased by 25%. Second,
the village ordinance lowered the project area requirements for detention to all
commercial/industrial sites regardless of size,and residential projects of 5 acres or larger.
The village ordinance was revised again in 1985. At this time the 25% increase in
MSD calculated detention volume was deleted. In its place the runoff factors were
increased from 0.15 for grass to 0.50 and from 0.90 for impervious surface to 0.95, and the
release rate was changed from a runoff factor of 0.15 to either a release rate of 0.20 c1s.
(cubic feet per second) per acre or a release rate calculated using the 0.15 runoff factor
whichever is less. Except for very large projects such as, Kensington Center, the 020 cf.s
per acre release rate has been the governing rate.
The reasoning behind those revisions were a.) the runoff rates were increased based
on the assumption that during the 100 year rain used in the calculations for detention, the
ground would become saturated, therefore leading to larger runoff rates than normal and
b.) the release rate was reduced based on studies done by state and federal agencies
showing that streams in this area are only capable of handling runoff volumes in the area
of 0.15 to 0.20 c.f.s. per acre.
At the direction of the Village Board, a study was done to see if it would be feasible
to lower the acreage requirements for detention in residential projects.
2
DETENTION ORDINANCE
July 25, 1991
A study was done on three types of developments.
A.) Sinjale Family,
The required detention would be 2,047 cubic feet. Based on the zoning
requirement for a 25' minimum rear yard it would require a 1'-3" deep, 25'
wide and 65' long basin to provide 2,047 cubic feet of storage. Storage could
be provided underground but it would require 290' of 36" diameter pipe or
104' of 60" diameter pipe. Also, to restrict the release rate to meet code
would require a restrictor less than 3" in diameter. Pipes less than 3" are
not recommended because of maintenance problems.
The required detention would be 14,810 c.f. This subdivision had a total
length across the 4 rear yards at of 280'. Again assuming a 25' rear yard set
back, the depth of the detention area would be 2'- 2" for the full 280' x 25'.
Underground storage would require 2,100' of 36" pipe or 755' of 60",pipe
The required detention would be 27,165 cubic feet. This subdivision had a
rear yard perimeter of 960'. Assuming the 25' rear yard,. detention depth
would be about 1' 2". Underground storage would require 3,850' of 36" pipe
or 1,385' of 60" pipe. Another alternative in this 8 lot subdivision would be
to use 1 lot as a detention basin. A basin of 100'x 75' and 3'- 7" deep would
be required for detention.
The above detention calculations were based on our current zoning code requirement
limiting lot coverage to 45%. Greater lot coverage would require larger detention volumes.
E
3
Chuck
Village of Moet Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Village Manager
FROM:
Director of Inspection Services
DATE-
June 27, 1991
SUBJECT:
Detention Requirements
The Village Board requested staff review the existing detention requirements with
the idea of requiring detention for more and smaller size properties.
Our current code - Chapter 16.405. F.1 - requires detention for all commercial and
industrial zoned development, regardless of size and all residential development five (5)
acres or larger.
The Board had suggested lowering the size limitation for residential lots to 3 or even
2 acres. One problem with this size limitation is that the residential zoning classifications
allow uses, such as, schools, churches municipal, park and library buildings. These uses
may have ground coverage much higher than the typical residential use and could be built
on less than 2 or 3 acres, Therefore, I suggest we use a "hybrid" language which is tied to
both size and lot coverage. Suggested language: Art. 16.405.17.1. General: All commercial
and industrial zoned developments, regardless of size shall include provisions for stormer, and any
water holding facilities. All residentially zoned developments 2 acres or larger,
residentially zoned developments, regardless of size, which exceed the allowable lot
coverage area, specified in the Zoning Code shall include provisions for storm water holding
facilities.
huck
CB/rn
VWL/
8/28/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
RELATIVE TO STORM WATER DETENTION REQUIREMENTS
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 16.405.F.1 of Article IV of Chapter 16
of the village Code of Mount Prospect is hereby amended by deleting
Section 16.405.F.1 in its entirety and substituting therefor the
following; so that hereinafter said Section 16.405.F.1 shall be and
read as follows:
it F.l. General: All commercial and industrial zoned
developments, regardless of size shall include provisions for storm
water holding facilities. All residentially zoned developments two
(2) acres or larger, and any residentially zoned developments,
regardless of size, which exceed the allowable lot coverage area,
specified in the Zoning Code shall include provisions for storm
water holding facilities.
All storm water detention facilities other than roof tops, parking
lots and/or underground storage shall be located not less than
seventy-five feet (751) from any building or structure to be
occupied."
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Village of `t'ount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1991
SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF LEASE AGREEMENT WITH COMMONWEALTH
EDISON
The Village has a lease agreement with Commonwealth Edison for the area on Pine
Street where the Commonwealth Edison substation presently exists. We were allowed
permission for access on to the ten -foot easement area between the old Public Works
water department and Commonwealth Edison property. There may be a need for an
extension of this easement for construction purposes if, as and when development takes
place on this property. I am recommending that we extend the agreement for an
additional five-year period of time. If, at any time, we find we do not need this
easement extension, we can be released from it at any time.
It costs the Village $1.00 for this easement and it may be beneficial to us as we look
at development along the Pine Street corridor.
I am recommending that the Village authorize the extension of the agreement with
Commonwealth Edison for a period of five years to end on September 30, 1996.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
JFD/rcw
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: TRUSTEE PAUL HOEFERT
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1991
SUBJECT: PUBLIC PLACES NAMES COMMITTEE
On Monday, August 26, the Public Place Names Committee met to discuss the
establishment of a policy with regards to naming public structures in Mount Prospect.
No formal policy was derived, however, a great amount of valuable discussion did occur.
Unfortunately, this procedure of deriving a policy is deadlocked because of the suggested
name which is already on the table for our new Police and Fire Station. If the policy
had been developed prior to the suggestion, I believe it could have been objectively
accomplished.
In my estimation, naming a public structure after one individual permanently recognizes
that individual and his/her accomplishments but completely ignores and locks out other
individuals from the past and into the future who may be worthy of a like honor. I
believe a more flexible approach (policy) is to use functional names for our public
structures with those structures being dedicated to individuals who have given selfless,
meritorious service to the Village at -large or to the organization which that structure
represents.
The concept of a "wall of honor" was discussed and I find the idea to have great merit.
Specific to public buildings, each building could have a wall of plaques honoring those
individuals so chosen which could be viewed by the public for all time. In this way, one
person is not singled out for his/her outstanding service at the exclusion of many others.
Plaques recognizing additional individuals could also be added over time.
I would like to see the new "Mount Prospect Police and Fire Station" named so and
upon its completion, be dedicated to the deserving individuals who helped found, nurture
and mold Mount Prospect's Police and Fire services into the fine, outstanding
Departments which we have today. Robert Teichert could certainly be among these
people.
PAUL WM. HOEFERT
PVM/rcw
c: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon
Village of Mount Prospect
M
Mount Prospect, Illinois '
. g.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: TRUSTEE LEO FLOROS
DATE: AUGUST 28, 1991
SUBJECT: ESTABLISHING POLICY FOR NAMING PUBLIC PLACES
The Committee appointed by Mayor Farley to develop a Board policy for naming public
places met on Monday, August 26, at Village Hall. The Committee included current
Village Trustees Leo Floros (Chairman) and Paul Hoefert and former Village "Trustees
Ralph Arthur and Earl Lewis.
The Committee reviewed the findings of a survey of Northwest Municipal Conference
members regarding written policies on naming public buildings, streets, bridges, etc.
Fourteen communities responded and only one (the City of Evanston) had a written
policy on the subject matter.
Evan ton's policy for naming public places authorizes the Mayor to appoint a Citizens'
Advisory Committee on Public Places to make recommendations to the City Council on
this matter. The policy established broad criteria for naming public places after certain
individuals; i.e., that the individual had a distinguished public service career or that he
or she had a close association with the public place to be named.
Other communities reported as follows:
rlingtgn Heights- Has named its Public Works Center after former Village
Manager L. A. Hansen.
Buffalo Grove: Has named a Village street for all past Village Presidents.
Des Plaino; No policy.
Glenview: No policy.
Hanover Park- No policy.
Hoffman_ Board Room and Conference Room are named after certain
individuals,, No specific procedure followed.
Libertyville: Village Board has named public facilities for persons living of
deceased.
Morton Grove: Village Hall named for former Mayor (now deceased). No
formal policy exists.
Palatine: No policy.
Prospect Naming new Council Chambers for past Mayor John Gilligan.
Rollin�� ws., Fire Stations named after elected officials. Nothing else has
been named.
Vernon Hills: No policy.
Stregmwo9d: No policy.
The Committee then discussed at length whether public buildings should be identified
with any individual's name. Two members (Floros and Lewis) favored naming buildings
after outstanding citizens of the community, The other two members (Hoefert and
Arthur) opposed any such identification favoring instead that the building simply be
identified by its function. Hoefert and Arthur also would accept a policy in which a
building is dedicated to an individual or individuals as was the case with the dedication
of the Senior Citizens' Center to Carolyn Krause, with an appropriate plaque mounted
at the entryway.
All four Committee members were in agreement that streets could be named after
persons living or dead.
After much discussion, it was apparent that no agreement was possible over the matter
of whether a public building could be named after a Mount Prospect citizen, let along
establishing a criteria for having a public place so named.
The Committee, therefore, regretfully reports it has failed in its mission and returns the
issue to the Board for final resolution.
LEO FLOROS
LF/rcw
c: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon
J
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Street Superintendent
DATE: August 6, 1991
SUBJECT: Thermoplastic Marking Program
Attached is a memo from the Northwest Municipal Conference
indicating the results of the bid opening for the 1991 Thermo-
plastic Program. In order to proceed with the Village's
portion of the contract, Village Board approval is required.
This project will be funded with monies from Account 01-071-04-
6145, which currently has $15,000(page 126).
Based on the Northwest Municipal Conference's recommendations,
I recommend that the ac
cept.,the.-Thermoplastic
ings "yup to the
proposal as spIxai-tted by Mark S'fiT�" Corp.
4- _Ab"&V_6 ------ -
maximum of l 5,000 as men't e
MelvJn L Both
MB/ib
I concur with the above recommendation.
6� Vke Lo Z�zj� 6-
I brbert L. Weeks
Director Public Works
NWMC
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
1616 E.
GOLF ROAD
A REGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS
DES PLAINES,
IL 60016
MUNICIPAL] TIES AND TOWNSHIPS
(708) 296-9200 FAX: 296-9207
REPRESENTING A POPULATION OF OVER ONE MILLION
FOUNDED IN 7 958
Arlington HeighIS
Bartington
TO:
Participants in the 1991
Thermoplastic
Banlett
Lane Marking Program
Buffalo Grove
Des Plaines
Elk Grove Village
FROM:
e' ,rrrr
Evanston
Brian C. Nigbor Xroject
Coordinator
Glencoe
Glenview
Hanover Park
SUBJECT:
Bid Results
Highland Park
Holtman Estates
DATE:
June 4, 1991
Inverness
Lake Forest
lake Zurich
bberty,fle
Lincolnwood
Morlon Grove
Response to
Mark-It's thermoplastic
pricing has been
Mount Prospect
favorable.
As a result, we are proceeding
with a
Niles
contract.
Mark-It is currently signing
contracts. They
Northbrook
will be distributed
to you within a
week or two.
Northfield
Palatine
Park Ridge
Attached is
a price comparison from
the three bids
Prospect Heights
received.
As you will see, the bids
were very close.
Rolling Meadows
Roselle
SchaumDurg
Mark-It may
contact you any day now
to discuss your work.
Skokie
Streamwood
ms
Vernon Hills
Wheeling
enc.
Wilmette
Ntrinell
Elk Grove Two.
Maine Two.
New Trier Two,
Northfield Two,
Wheeling Two,
OFFICERS
President
Sonya A. Crawstraw
Hanover Park
Vice-Prestdent
Joan W. Barr
Evanston
Secretary-Peasuret
William R. Sommer
Lincolnwood
Executive Director
Rita A, Athas
1991 Thermoolastie Bids
Item
4" yellow
6" yellow
4" white
6" white
12" white
24" white
GrindingJln. ft
Grinding/sq. ft
RxR symbol
turn arrow
through arrow
combo arrow
ONLY
T 0 T A L S
Quantity
Mark -
It
Needed
Unit Cost
Extended
26849
$0.35
$9,397.15
76
$0.50
$38.00
5200
$0.38
$1,976.00
16840
$0.55
0,262.00
7064
$1.10
$7,770.40
991
$2.00
$1,982.00
3600
$0.49
$1,764.00
750
$1.45
$1,087.50
8
$250.00
$2,000.00
7
$35.00
$245.00
9
$25.00
$225.00
1
$45.00
$45.00
11 $45.00 $495.00
Superior
Unit Cost Extended
$0.37 $9,934.13
$0.52 $39.52
$0.37 $1,924.00
$0.52 $8,756.80
$1.25 $8,830.00
$1.95 $1,932.45
$0.45 $1,620.00
$1.25 $937.50
$153.00 $1,224.00
$39.00 $273.00
$28.75 $258.75
$65.00 $65.00
$52.00 $572.00
$36,367.15
Marking Specialists
Unit Cost Extended
$0.45 $12,082.05
$0.65 $49.40
$0.45 $2,340.00
$0.65 $10;946.00
$1.25 $8,830.00
$2.45 $2,427.95
$0.50 $1,800.00
$1.50 $1,125.00
$175.00 $1,400.00
$40.00 $280.00
$35.00 $315.00
$75.00 $75.00
$65.00 $715.00
$42,385.40
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
1616 E. GOLF ROAD
DES PLAINES. IL 60016
(71 296.9200 FAX: 296-9207
A,ii,igo, He,gNs
Sarringiriq
9zi
Bulalo Grove
Des Plaines
Elk Gmve Village
Evanston
Glencoe
Glen,,sw
Hanovier Park
P-1
Hriff ,an i
in vemess
Lake ro'em
Lake Z.ncn
Lipenvville
Lincolnwood
Morton Grove
Mount Prospect
Niles
Nonnbrook
Nor"inheid
Palatine
Park Ridge
Prospect Heights
Rolling Meadows
Poseie
Schaumburg
Skokie
St'earn.00p
Vernon Kills
Wheefing
Wilmerle
Ninnetka
Elk Grove Twp
Maine Twip,
New Trier Two.
Northfield Twp.
Wheeling Twp
OFFICERS
President
Sonya A. Crawshaw
Hanover Park
Vice•Presi
Joan W Barr
Evanston
Secretary- Treasurer
William R. Sommer
Lincolnwood
Executive Director
Pita R. Athas
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
NWMC
APEGIONAL ASSOCIATION OF ILLINOIS
MUNICIPALITIESAND TOWNSHIPS
REPRESENTING A POPULATION OF OVER ONE MILLION
FOUNDED IN 1958
Participants in the 1991 Thermoplastic
Program
Brian C. Nigbor, P!rgrject coordinator
Announcing Low Bid Results
May 24, 1991
Bids were opened for the 1991 thermoplastic program last
week. Three competitive bids were received, with
Mark -It Corp. low by a small margin.
Pricing is as follows:
611 yellow - $ .50/lineal foot,
411 yellow - $ .35/lineal foot
411 white - $ .38/lineal foot
611 white - $ .55/lineal foot
1211 white - $1.10/lineal foot
2411 white - $2.00/lineal foot
RxR Symbols - $250.00 each
ONLY - $ 45.00 each
Turn Arrows - $ 35.00 each
Through Arrows - $ 25.00 each
Combo Arrows - $ 45.00 each
Grinding $.49/lineal foot - 411 wide,
$1.45 foot for all other work
Contact the Conference within the next few days on
whether these prices are acceptable to you. I do not
want to proceed with a formwal award until I hear from
everyone. Work will be able to begin by mid-June if all
continues smoothly.
kk
19
Village of Mk...jnt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO. Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
FROM: Fred Tennyson, Project Engineer
DATE. August 20, 1991
SUBJECT. 1991 Reconstruction Program
its Inywketim ftposal
Listed below are five cost proposals to do a soils investigation for this year's
reconstruction program Each testing firm submitted a proposal that included different and
varying services. After careful review of all the proposals received, I recommend that the village
accept Soil & Material Consultants, Inc. proposal for $2,242.00.
C_ Soil & Material Consultants, Inc. ..$2242.00'
Professional Service Industries, Inc. $2,
3.) H.H. Holmes Testing Laboratories, Inc. $2,952-00
4.) O'Brien & Associates, Inc. $3,225.00
5.) Material Testing Laboratories, Inc. $5,229.00
This work will be funded from Account No. 22-037-06-6615 on page 66 of the 1991-
92 Village Budget.
red
FT/m
Listed below are the streets that will be tested:
1.)
Lois Court
Lawrence Ln. to Cul-de-sac
2.)
Jody Court
Meier Road to Cul-de-sac
3.)
91ilegate Drive
Cathy Lane to Cul-de-sac
4.)
Thayer Street
Stevenson Lane to Wolf Road
V 1 1 1 a g of V punt Prospect
Moun. Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 1� *\Zz'
TO: Mr. John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Chuck Bencic, Inspection Services Director
DATE: 8-22-91
RE, 1991 ROAD RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
SOILS INVESTIGATION
Proposals for soils investigations for this years reconstruction program
were solicited from soil testing firms. Five firms returned proposals.
Attached is a memo listing the proposals submitted. I agree with the
recommendation of Project Engineer Fred Tennyson to accept the proposal
submitted by Soils & Materials Consultants, Inc.
Chuck Bencic
CB: rm
Attach.
cc: Engineering
File
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W CM US4
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: August 22, 1991
SUBJ: Engineering Study
High Service Pump Replacement - Phase 4
For the past several years we have been phasing in modernization
and replacement of our high service pumps at our pumping sta-
tions. This work is being done in conjunction with a study on
energy efficiency which was completed in 1987/88 by Greeley and
Hansen Engineers.
Attached is a proposal from Greeley and Hansen for engineering
services in connection with Phase 4 of this project. This phase
would complete replacement of pumping equipment at our Stations
#16 and #17. Greeley and Hansen have quoted a price of $18,000
for engineering design and inspection on this project.
This phase will nearly complete our program, with the exception
of pumping Station #5, which we purposely delayed work on until
we know if there is going to be any need in the future to supply
water to Citizens Utilities Company's service area. This sta-
tion has two pumps, which would be modified to either accommo-
date increased flows which would be needed for Citizens Utili-
ties area, or reduced capacity to maintain sufficient pressure
and volume for our existing service area without excessive
starts and stops.
I recommendt�fvillage accept
Hansen f or,°" 100.
00-7
Herbert L.
the proposal of Greeley age
HLW/eh
cc: Finance Director
Village Clerk
HISERVPU.MPS/FILES/WATER
Weeks
G R E E L E Y AND H A N S E N
N (_,9 I N E F, R S
n22 ',301)1P RM RSIDE P1 AZA CHICAG�l 1V UNC�S 606(X' 5965 648 IV5S
August 9, 1991
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Subject: High Service Pumps Replacement Phase 3
Proposal for Engineering Services
Dear Mr. Weeks:
In response to Mr. Glen Andler's verbal request on June 18, 1991, we are pleased to submit
a proposal for engineering services for design and services during construction for Phase 3 of
the high service pump replacement program. Enclosed are three copies of ScoPR of Engineeriog
Services and Summa ry of Estimated Manhours and Compgnsation. Total estimated compensa-
tion is $18,000.
We are available to start work upon your authorization and expect to complete contract
documents within 120 days. We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide
engineering services for the High Service Pump Replacements, and look forward to your favorable
consideration.
TJH/asb
Enclosure
Yours very truly,
GREELEY AND HANSEN
Terre J. Hodnik, Associate
Allan B. Edwards, Partner
F 0 U N 0 E 0 1 N 1 9 1 4
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
for
High Service Pump Replacement Phase 3
GREELEY AND HANSEN
August 1991
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The PROJECT comprises furnishing engineering services required for the design and preparation
of contract documents, bid review, shop drawing review, start-up testing, final inspection and
punch list follow-up for the replacement with higher efficiency pumping units of existing Pumping
Unit No. 2 at Pump Station No. 16 and existing Pumping Unit No. 2 at Pump Station No. 17.
B. SCOPE OF SERVICES BY GREELEY AND HANSEN
1. Conduct Field Survey and Obtain Basic Data:
Field survey to obtain field measurements of piping and equipment, photograph existing
facilities, and review existing electrical power service and monitor control center facilities.
Obtain available facility plan drawings and electrical schematic diagrams of existing
facilities.
2. Design Electrical and Mechanical Connections:
Conduct hydraulic analysis and select pumping equipment.
Layout mechanical piping connections for new pumps.
Prepare electrical and instrumentation schematic diagrams.
Determine motor starter modifications, select motor protection devices
and size electrical wires and conduit.
3. Contract Documents:
Prepare contract drawings and specifications for demolition work, installation of pumps,
piping connections, electrical modifications, and instrumentation modifications. Meet with
Village staff to review preliminary contract documents. Provide VILLAGE with 3
preliminary and 3 final copies of contract documents.
4. Opinion of Construction Cost:
Prepare opinion of probable construction cost.
5. Prepare Permit Applications for Illinois Environmental Protection Agency and Village
Code Enforcement Office.
6. Bid Review:
Review bids and prepare bid evaluation report.
7. Shop Drawing Review:
Review shop drawings submitted by Contractor during construction.
a. Site Visit During Construction:
Provide an engineer on-site for three visits during construction.
9. Start-up Testing and Final Inspection:
Provide an engineer on-site to monitor field testing by the Contractor for the new pumps
and electrical support systems to be installed at Pump Stations No. 16 and 17. Conduct
a final inspection of contract work and prepare a punch list of items requiring correction.
10. Punch List Follow-up:
Monitor completion of punch list items by Contractor.
C. SERVICES PROVIDED BY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1. Assemble basic data available from existing Village records.
2. Provide services of water operations supervisor to assist during field survey and start-up
testing.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND COMPENSATION
for
HIGH SERVICE PUMP REPLACEMENT PHASE 3
Greeley and Hansen
August 1991
A. ESTIMATED MANIHOURS
Estimated Direct Labor - Hours
Task
Partner
Pro'. Mqr.
En , iineer
Text
Editing
1.
Field Survey and Basic Data
0
2
16
0
2.
Design
1
6
40
0
3,
Contract Documents
3
8
so
33
4.
Opinion of Probable Construction
0
1
8
2
Cost
5.
Permit Applications
0
2
8
2
6.
Bid Review
0
4
8
2
7.
Shop Drawing Review
1
10
20
2
8.
Site Visits During Construction
0
4
12
0
9.
Start-up Assist and Final Inspection
0
10
7
2
10.
Punch List
0
4
8
2
Total
5
51
177
45
B. ESTIMATED COMPENSATION
1.
Estimated Direct Labor Costs
Partner
5 hrs.
@
$45.00
$ 250
Project Manager
51 hrs.
@
$33.00
1,685
Engineer
177 hrs.
@
$19.00
3,365
Text Editing
45 hrs.
@
$12.00
540
Subtotal
$ 5,840
2.
Estimated Salary Costs, Overhead and Profit
$ 11,680
Direct Labor x 2.0
3.
Other Direct Costs
$ 110
Local Travel 400 miles @ 0.275
$ 370
Printing, Reproduction, Film & Processing
Subtotal
$ 480
Total Estimated Compensation
$ 18,000