HomeMy WebLinkAbout4306_001VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4336
Next Resolution No. 33-91
ALL
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING August 20, 1991
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center August 20, 1991
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Cloves Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Irvana Wilks
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Cloves
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, August 6, 1991
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE BEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance decreases the number of Class "W"
liquor licenses by one, Sizzler Restaurant, 110
East Rand Road. (Exhibit A)
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 30-V-91, 407 S. Meier Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 407 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow
a 2.331 sideyard, rather than the required
6.51, in order to accommodate an existing
basketball court. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B)
B. ZBA 37-V-91, 205 South Audrey Lane
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 205 S. AUDREY LANE
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow
a 61 911 sideyard setback, rather than the
required 9.251, and a variation to allow a 271
front yard setback rather than 301 to allow
construction of an addition to an existing garage.
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit C)
C.
ZBA 39-V-91, 1050 South Linnemann Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1050 SOUTH LINNEMAN ROAD
This Ordinance grants variations to allow
a circular driveway and the resulting 48%
front yard lot coverage, rather than the permitted
350. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
(Exhibit D)
D.
ZBA 40 -SU -91 and ZBA 41-V-91, 625 Meier Road
ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL
USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
625 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
This Ordinance grants a Special Use Permit
to allow a 3 -car garage and a variation to allow
a 34 foot wide driveway, rather than the permitted
211. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
(Exhibit E)
E.
ZBA 42-V-91, 748 Whitegate Court
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 748 WHITEGATE COURT
This Ordinance would allow a total lot coverage
of 47.3% rather than the 45% allowed.
(Exhibit F)
F.
ZBA 43-V-91, 1818 Aztec Lane
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1818 AZTEC LANE
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow
construction of a deck which will result
in a 11 511 side yard at the narrowest point,
rather than the required 101. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 4-1.
(Exhibit. G)
G.
ZBA 44-V-91, 503 South Elmhurst Road
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 503 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
This Ordinance grants variations to allow
a circular driveway and to allow a front yard
coverage of 53.8%, rather than the allowed 35%.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
this request by a vote of 2-3.
I
(Exhibit. H)
H.
ZBA 47-V-91, 600 Carboy Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 600 CARBOY ROAD
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a
10 foot rear yard to accommodate a building
addition, rather than the required 201. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-0.
(Exhibit J)
I. ZBA 48 -SU -91, 1840-1894 S. Elmhurst Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE
NO. 4156 GOVERNING' PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
AT 1840 - 1E194 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
This Ordinance amends Ordinance No. 4156 to
allow limited retail uses in the Rogers
Industrial Park. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended qranting this request by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit K)
J. ZBA 49-Z-91, 1910 South Busse Road, Cook County
School Bus Company
1st reading of AN , ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL
ZONING MAP OF THE `VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance re -'zones the subject property
from R -X to R-4 (Residential Development). The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit L)
K. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19
OF THE VILLAGECODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance establishes regulations
governing disposal of medical waste. (Exhibit M)
L. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance establishes regulations
governing locations of newspaper vending
machines. (Exhibit N)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. Recommendation for Phase I Storm Sewer
Improvements bid, Szabo Paving & Construction
2. Recommendation for construction engineering
services for Phase I Storm Sewer Improvements,
R.J.N. Environmental
3. Purchase and planting of shade trees in
parkways
4. Installation, replacement, and testing of water
meters
5. Northwest Highway sidewalk improvements, Maple
Street to School Street
B. Request for approval of $2400 in additional funds for
1991 Fourth of July parade.
C. Request to waive the bidding process for Village
Christmas decorations and renew 3 year contract with
Folger Flag and Decorating.
D. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
t��4 6741011)"I"C15"A
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AUGUST 6, 1991
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:31 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Timothy Corcoran
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Busse. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MINUTES
Mayor and Board of Trustees held July 16, 1991, as
amended.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floros, Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Pass: Clowes, Hoefert
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved APPROVE BILLS
to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 653,003
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
168,942
Community Development Block Grant Fund
18,558
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
80,883
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
74,026
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,392
Risk Management Fund
111,912
Vehicle Replacement Fund
7,796
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep. Fund
3,395
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1985
17,134
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1991
3,043
Fire & Police Building Const.
71,865
Flood Control Revenue Fund
36,801
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
21,567
Police Pension Fund
42,349
Firemen's Pension Fund
43,756
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,356,422
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS, CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
Maurice Hallahan, President of the Pickwick Commons PICKWICK
West Homeowners Association, expressed concern that COMMONS
VANDALISM
l
various autivi!ties are taking ,place in the 'field area
abutting P ckwick Commons that cause damage to property
as well a- confrontations between residents and those
using th rea. a Haliahan tated that calls to the
Police hfi not resolved the problems.
Lillian Perham, 501 West Dempster, asked that the Board
consider ]towering the speed limit on Dempster Street,
which is-15 MPH, and to install more street lights.
Ms'. Perham; stated that with the new Mount Prospect Park
Districtcreation-Center to 'open soon many children
will be a attempting to cross; Dempster and fears an
accident;i4ll happen due to the high rate of speed on
Dempster.,/U
1A
qq
Mayor Farl?ey stated that he would have the Police Chief
or'repree�ntative contact Mr.'Hallahan in an attempt
toresolu* these problems.
t
NAMING NEW FIRE
Tim, Murp President of the Mount Prospect'Lions Club,
& POLICE STATION
Robert Haw rd, 'Commander -of theiMount, Prospect American
Legion Po7st 525, and Jack reefer,`Commander of the
Mount Propect VFW Plast, stated that their respective
s
civic organizations ask that the village Board name the
new Fire Police Station, to be constructed at 112
East Northwest Highway, after Robert D. Teichert.
Jc
Mayor Farley stated, that he has appointed an Ad Hoc
Public P7�ace Naming Committee for the purpose of
esteblishng a policy of this subject. The Committee
is schedu d to make their recommeidntions as to policy
by Septem er 10th so he asked that these organizations
wait for that'' recommendation.
Trustee �sse, se onded� by "trustee -Wilks, moved to
consider An, item not listed on=the genda,,namely the
subject -of, naming the new Fire and -Police Station after
Robert D'' ,'r,Teichert.
Upon rol' call: Ayes: Busse, clowes, Wilks
Nays: Floros, Hoefert
Motion failed, due to the lack of the 4 affirmative
votes regp"ired by Village Code.
Q
r;
MAYOR S � RT
VETO:
Mayor Faey brought the subject to,", the floor relative
ORD.NO. 4325
to his veto of Ordinance No. 4326,rhich would create
a Class ` 4P" liquor license for 'the Convenient Food
Mart at 2025East Euclid Avenue.
P
The follpwing residents spoke in opposition to this
establishwent: having a liquor license:..
Janice zemaitis, 2007 East Euclid Avenue
Idyl Nip1j"r, 290'North Westgate
Jan Ferguson, 2012 Hopi Lane
There wai discussion by members of: the village Board
as to whether the Mayor has veto :power. Everette
Hill, at t rney for the Village, gage his legal opinion
that the Rayor does: have such veto, power. There was
also discussion relative to the fact that the Village
r
r
Pae 2 - August 6, 1991
1
t
of Mount Prospect operates under the Managerial
form of government, as established by referendum
in 1967.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4325 creating a
Class 11P11 liquor license for the Convenient Food
Mart at 2025 East Euclid Avenue and therefore
overriding the Mayor's veto of this Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Wilks
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
Mayor Farley stated that the Liquor Commissioner
has the total authority to issue liquor licenses.
Mayor Farley stated that solicitors have
called residents of the Village requesting
financial support for the Mount Prospect Police
Council. The Mayor stated that the Council
represents the a bargaining agent and that
funds donated to this organization do not
benefit the Police Department directly.
OIJ) BUSINESS
ZBA 35-V-91, 112 East Northwest Highway
ZBA 35-V-91
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
112 E.NORrHWEST
would grant the variations necessary to
FIRE & POLICE
construct the new Fire and Police Station
STATION
at the existing location, 112 East Northwest
Highway. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting the variations requested.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
ORD.NO. 4331
for passage of Ordinance No. 4331
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 112 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Notion carried.
ZBA 36-V-91, 11 South Pine Street
ZBA 36-V-91
An Ordinance was presented for second reading
11 S. PINE
that would grant a variation to allow a 5 foot
sideyard setback, rather than the required 101,
in order to allow 3 trailers. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
ORD.NO. 4332
for passage of Ordinance No. 4332
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED AT 11 SOUTH PINE STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 - August 6, 1991
1
MODIFICATION
An;Ordinarfce was presented for second reading that
the, Development Code
FROM DEVELOPMENT
would grf a mod.fpati+n from
for property located'at 1824 Sitka Lane
CODE:
18'1.4 SITKA LANE
(Chapter)
to permit re 2°1/2 foot flare on the east side of the
parkway•e Jan,,�Ommission recommended granting this
modificat" .
ORD..NO. 4333
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee`Wilks, moved for
passage 0C Ordinance No.. 4333
s
AN 0, 11INANCE GRANTING A MODIFICATION FROM
THE pEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR
PROP"2 Y LOCATED AT 1824+SITkA LANE
Upon rollllcall: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
r
Nays: None
Motion ca "tied.
AMEND CH. 18:
An Ordinapce was presented for second reading that
COMPLIANCE
would akin Chapter IS (Traffic Code) to allow certain
violatic8 to be paid by main., rather than requiring
a court a pearance.. This method;of collection would
reduce t[l time required for Police ;officers to appear
in; court' l
ORD.NO., 4334
y
Trustee Sfusse, seconded, by Trustee Clowes, moved for
passage o Ordinance No. 4334
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER,;18 (TRAFFIC
CODiE OF THE 'VILLAGE CODE OF',MOUNT PROSPECT
r
Upon roW call: Ayes: Busse, Clewes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
+' Nays: None
1.
Motion c e; rigid.
J
NEW BUSII�SS
ZBA 30-V-91
ZSA 30^ V^ ' 1, 407 Lauth Meier Road
tau is requesting' a variation to allow a
407 S. METER RD.
The P oner
2.33' si-e yard, rather than tke required „S� in,
order tui accommodate an existing patio/basketball
court.JThe Zdb ng Board of , ape is recommended
granting phis request by a vote of6-0.
Trstee;ilks, seconded by Trus=tee 'Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of>the Zoning 'Board of
Appeals Mind grant the variation re4uested in
ZBA 30-'ST491.
Upon rol}'call: Ayes: Busse, Clo4es, Floros,
Hoefert, W,i�ks
t
Nays: None
a;
Motion c�rried.
t
An. Ordinince will be presented August 20th for first
reading.l
ZSA 37-V-91
ZBA 37-V, 91, 205 South Audrey Labe
Peti inner is ,requesting -a variation to allow a6°
'
205 S. Audrey Ln.
The an
9. side, );yard hack to permit. 4n addition to
existing one -car garage. The Zo ibg Board of Appeals.
recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
Page 4 - August 6, 1991
f
The original petition for variations included
a request to permit a 231 611 front yard setback,
rather than the required 301. The Petitioner
withdrew that request following the recommendation
of the Zoning Board of Appeals to deny the request
for a front yard variation.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the 61 911 sideyard
variation as requested in ZBA 37-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
on August 20th.
ZBA 38-V-91, 1201 West Busse Avenue ZBA 38-V-91
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow 1201 W.BUSSE
a 21 foot front setback to allow an addition to
an existing garage and home. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended denying this request.
Trustee Wilks, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
grant the variation requested in ZBA 38-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Wilks
Nays: Clowes, Floros, Hoefert
Motion failed.
ZBA 39-V-91, 1050 South Linnemann Road ZBA 39-V-91
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow 1050 LINNEMANN
a circular driveway which would result in a
front yard lot coverage of 48%, rather than the
permitted 35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting the requests in ZBA 39-V-91
by a vote of 7-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals and
grant the variations requested in ZBA 39-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 40 -SU -91 and ZBA 41-V-91, 625 Meier Road ZBA 40 -SU -91
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use Permit ZBA 41-V-91
to allow a 3 -car garage and a variation to allow 625 MEIER RD
a 34 foot wide driveway, rather than the permitted
21 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote 7-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Page 5 - August 6, 1991
j
Board of`;Appeals and grant the requests being the
subject of ZBA 4o-SU-91 and ZBA 41-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks ,
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented August 20th for first
reading.
i
ZBA 42-V-91 ZBA 42-V ,91, 748 Whitegate Court
74.8 WHITEGATE The petitioner requested a variation to allow a
COURT driveway i5, feet wide, rather; thin 'the permitted 21"
a variat + n to allow a .lot coverage of 48.8%, rattier
,
than thepermitted 45%; and, a variation to allow a
front ye 'rd lot coverage of 39.90%, rather than the
,
prmitt 35. The Zoning Board of Appeals vote of 3-
4 denied these requests,. The Zoning and of Appeals
is final din these requests, Clue d the fact that the
variatiorie requested did not e;eed the 2S of the
permitteduses.
The petitioner is appealing the decision of the Zoning
Board ot;'Appeals and asked that the 'village Board'
considerhese requests, noting that the petitionr Bad
revised; the site plan to depict a 25 foot wide driveway
at the garage tapering to 21 feet at the street.
It was noted that theseivariations are being requested'
to allow a fishing boat to be parked in the front yard
on, a parking pad during the ;summer months.
The following residents voiced their opposition to the
variatitr7s being requested
Wesley Finchctt, 747 Whitegate
Marlene hastic, 741 Whitegate
Mr.. & Mr%e. Lindgren, 743 Whitegate
Trustee ,Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved i to
deny the appeal from the decision of the Zoning Board
of Appeals.
r
Upon roll call: Ayes: iClowes
Nays: Busse, Floros, Hoefert, Wilks
Motionfailed.
rusted ilks, seconded by Trusae Busse, moved to
grant t revis request to perMlt a lot coverage of
47.3% wtich would permit a con<forminc 21 foot Wide
driveway
Upon roil call: ayes :Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, bilks
Nays: 'None
Motionsgarried.
An Ordinance will'be presented for ';first reading at, the:
Augustmeeting.
page 6 - August 6, 1991
ZBA 43-V-91, 1818 Aztec Lane
ZBA 43-V-91
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
1818 AZTEC LN
allow construction of a deck which will result
in a 11 511 side yard at the narrowest point, rather
than the required 101. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-1.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the variation requested in
ZBA 43-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Wilks
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
at the August 20th meeting.
Mayor Farley called a brief recess at this point,
RECESS
10:00 P.M.
The meeting was reconvened at 10:10 P.M.
RECONVENE
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Busse
Trustee Clowes
Trustee Floros
Trustee Hoefert
Trustee Wilks
ZBA 44-V-91, 503 South Elmhurst Road
ZBA 44-V-91
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
503 S.ELHHURST
a circular drive and to allow a front yard
ROAD
coverage of 53.8%, rather than the 35% allowed.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
this request by a vote of 2-3.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
to grant the variations requested in ZBA 44-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Wilks
Farley
Nays: Hoefert
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
at the August 20th meeting.
ZBA 47-V-91, 600 Carboy Road
ZBA 47-V-91
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
600 CARBOY
a 10 foot rear yard to accommodate a building
ROAD
addition, rather than the required 201. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested
in ZBA 47-V-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - August 6, 1991
,i ordinance will be presented for first readingon
August 26th.
ZBA 48 -SII -91
ZBA 48-B 91 1840-1898 South Elmhurst Road
to
1840-1894
The Petitioner is requesting an'agendment
Use in Ordinando No. 4156 to allow
S. ELMHURST RD.
ROGERS CORPORATE
the Special granted
limited,"` retail uses in the Rogers Corporate Park.
PARK
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request' by a vote .of 5-0.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals' and grant the request in Z°BA 48 -SU -91 -
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays:' None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading on
August 26th.
ZBA 49-Z-91
ZBA 49-Z-91, 1910 South Busse Road; Cook County School
1910 S.BUSSE RD
Bus Company
The Petitioner it requesting` this property be re -zoned
COOK COUNTY
SCHOOL BUS CO.
from R -X to R-4. It was noted that the R -X zoning was
assigned upon tbas property upon annexation. The,
Zoning, and of Appeals recommended granting; this
request by avote 'of 5-0.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Floras, moved to
concur with the recommendation of -,the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the rezoning requested in ZBA 49-Z--
91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Cloves, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion' carried.
An Ordinance will be 'presented for first reading on
August` joth.
ACCEPT
request was presented to accept the private
in conjunction with the
IMPROVEMENTS:
improvements installed
'Animal Clinic, 888 East Northwest
PLAINES
Mt. Planes
ANIMAL CLINIC
Highway.
888 E.N/W HWY.
Trustee','Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation oaf : staff and, accept the
in`conjunction with the
private improvements installed
Hospital located. at 888,1East
Mt. Plaines Animal
Northwest'Highway.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse„ Cloves, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse asked that an evaluation questionnaire
be established for hese types' of projects so the
treatment andperformance
Village; can evaluate the process,
of all involved.
Page '8 - August 6, 1991
A request was presented to accept the private
improvements installed in conjunction with the
Kentucky Fried Chicken business located at
1440 South Elmhurst Road.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to concur with the recommendation of staff and
accept the private improvements installed in
conjunction with the construction of the Kentucky
Fried Chicken building at 1440 South Elmhurst Road.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would establish regulations governing disposal of
medical waste. The regulations set forth are
recommended by the Northwest Municipal Conference.
Trustee Hoefert asked for a legal opinion as to
the liability of the Village in adopting these
regulations and possible lack of enforcement.
Trustee Busse asked that this Ordinance be presented
to local physicians and veterinarians for their input.
This Ordinance will be presented August 20th
for second reading.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would amend Chapter 11 of the Village Code by
establishing regulations governing the placement
of newspaper vending machines on public property.
This Ordinance will be presented for second
reading on August 20th.
VILLAGE HANAGERIS REPORT
Acting Village Manager, David C. Jepson, presented
the following bid results.
The following bids were received for "Work -Out
Clothing" (Gym clothing) for the sworn members
of the Fire Department, based on the total cost
per set:
Bidder Amount
Reuss $225.98
R & R 179.65
Krest 165.00
Artistic 105.97
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the recommendation of staff and
accept the low bid submitted by Artistic Sporting
in the amount of $105.97 per set of Work -Out
(gym) Clothing.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 9 - August 6, 1991
ACCEPT
IMPROVEMENTS:
KFC
1440 SOUTH
ELMHURST ROAD
AMEND CH. 19
MEDICAL
WASTE
AMEND CH. 11
NEWSPAPER
VENDING
MACHINES
BID RESULTS:
WORK-OUT
CLOTHING:
FIRE DEPT.
ARTISTIC
STATION
The following bids were bids were received for
uniform package:
WEAR
Fire Department station Wear, per
Bidder Amount
,
Kale$779.65
Kres f732.89
t
R &'t 617.05
R
R & R
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
of staff and accept the
concur with the recommendation
low bid submitted by R & R for Fire Department Station
Wear in ttie amount of $617.05 per uniform package.
Upon rollcall: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SELF CONTAINED
The follot4ing bids were received for five (5) MSA Self
with spare tanks and
BREATHING
I s
Contain44' Breathing Apparatu
APPARATUS
brackets for the Fire Department:
AIR ONE
HYDRAULIC
SYSTEMS
UNDERGROUND
UTILITIES:
SR. CTR. LOT
er hmgunA
Air One
$13,471.00
�
Interstate of Milwaukee 15,728.00
i by TruZ e
Trustee , Busse, seconded te Wilke, moved to
concur 4ith the recommendation of,, staff and accept the
low biditted by Air One for the purchase of five
Sel,f Corit4ined Breathing Apparatus with spare tanks and
bracketfor the Fire Department.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The foLlowing bids were received for the purchase of
two (2)'g ound speed central hydraulic sysiems for the
Public forks
Department:
I I hzg=
H6il-Chicago $18,071.20
H6yie Road Equipment 18,914.00
Bourbonnais'SupplY 18,959.00
Truste4 ;Busse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
concur with the recommendation of staff and accept the
low bidsubmitted by Heil -Chicago for two ground speed
centrai'hydrauliO systems in the, amount of $18,071.20.
Upon r611 call: Ayes: Busse, clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
motion carried.
The following proposals were received to relocate
the overhead utilities underground, located in
the municipal parking lot behind the Senior Center
Page 10 - August 6, 1991
and the municipal parking lot at the northeast corner
of Busse Avenue an Main Street:
Gibson Electric $ 7,370
Pinner Electric 12,000
Wood Electric 13,416
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to waive the bidding procedure and award the
contract to Gibson Electric to relocate the
overhead utilities underground in the municipal
parking lot behind the Senior Citizen Center and
at the northeast corner of Busse Avenue and Main
Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
GIBSON
ELECTRIC
A request was presented to increase the contract DOGWOOD
with Johnson Paving for the Dogwood Lane LANE
reconstruction. The original contract was for RECONSTRUCTION
$44,913.50, however, due to the fact that additional
aprons were necessary, the additional cost amounted
to $4,704.00. It was noted that with the additional
cost, the project was still below the budgeted amount.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved
JOHNSON
to increase the contract amount with Johnson Paving
PAVING
for the Dogwood Lane reconstruction project by
$4,704.00 for a total of $49,617.50.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented to waive the bidding procedure
LIFE
and authorize the purchase of a Life Pac 10 unit,
PAC 10
which is a specialized piece of equipment for the
Fire Department, from Physio Control in the amount
of $8,625.00.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Hoefert, moved
to waive the bidding procedure and authorize the
purchase of one (1) Life Pac 10 unit for the Fire
Department in the amount of $8,625.00 from Physio
Control.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays, None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
SELL
would authorize the sale of various vehicles through
VEHICLES
the annual Northwest Municipal Conference auction.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes; Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 11 - August 6, 1991
ORD.NO. 4335
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Clowes,moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4335
AN 'ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY ;PUBLIC
AUCTION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MATERIAL
The following proposals were received for the 1991
TESTING
resurfacing material testing program:
Soul &. Material Consultants $ 8,Material 862
Professional Service Industries 12,773737.00
H.`H. Holmes Testing Lab. Inc. 10,436.00
SOIL &
Trusteeusse, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved to
& Material
MATERIAL
accept he proposal received from Soil
Consultants in the amount o $8,862.00 for the 1991
C014SULTANTS
resurfacing material testing program.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays:' None
Motion carried.
INCREASE
A reque t was presented to increase the resurfacing
RESURFACING
ptogram'oontract,`due to the fact that bids were
the budgeted amount, which will allow
PROGRAM
received below
for an :additional 2.26 wiles of resurfacing.
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to;
concur with the recommendation of staff and increase
the resurfacing contracts by $432,042.99 for a total
of $1,0,7,957.01.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Clowes, Floros,
Hoefert, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion,carried.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
It was,announced that the Village Board Mould meet ill
PARKWAY
SHRUBS
an informal session at 8:00 A.N» on Saturday, August
of shrubs in the
10th is discuss the Village's policy
and obstructions throuthout the Village.
parkways,
ELK GROVE RURAL
Mr. Jepson noted that Cook County had made an error
bills for those resident
FIRE PROTECTION
on the'°read estate tax
'being faxed by both the Village and Elk Grove Rural
DISTRICT TAXES
Fire Protection i►istri; t. Arrangements are beingmade
to rectify that situation.
ADJOURN
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley adjourned the meeting at 11:30 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 12 - August 6, 1991
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
August 15, 1991
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
8/01/91 through
Per Attached
Journal
Balance
8/01/91
8/15/91
List of Bills
Entry
8/15/91
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,805,422
$ 156,738
$ 957,444
<34,000>
$ 970,716
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
726,893
91,255
7,811
810,337
Community Development Block Grant Fund
2,783
59,000
58,817
2,966
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
< 29,829>
8,084
11,542
34,000
713
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
2,975,749
188,416
419,847
2,744,318
Parking System Revenue
115,371
6,333
4,029
117,675
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,093,946
40,672
82,642
1,051,976
Vehicle Replacement Fund
557,544
16
167,737
389,823
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
157,065
25,612
173,004
9,673
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
127,624
851
-
128,475
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1991
490,473
-
3,023
487,450
Police & Fire Building Construction
6,435,327
4,215
13,468
6,426,074
Flood Control Revenue Fund
2,782,475
667
1,857
2,781,285
Debt Service Fund
862,045
1,436
-
863,481
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
4,025
3,560
4,800
2,785
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,366,515
13,804
15,598
1,364,721
Police Pension Fund
16,037,208
63,588
-
16,100,796
Firemen's Pension Fund
18,053,421
83,134
-
18,136,555
Benefit Trust Funds
248.859
232
2.167
246.924
$53,812.916
$ 747.613
$1.923.786
? -
$52.636.743
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ALMA GROUP, LTD.
AMERICAN PROPERTIES
BISHOP PLUMBING COMPANY
RICHARD BROCK
A. CAMPBELL
CARR BUILDERS
CITIBANK,N.A.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
CMK CONST. INC.
CONVENIENCE FOOD AND DELI, INC
MICHAEL CUDDY
DESIGNERS SHOWCASE
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
JOHN FABJANCE
FAR EAST CONSTRUCTION
FIRE CONTROL, INC.
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
MANFRED FRANSON
FREDIANI HOMES INC.
FREDRICK QUINN CORPORATION
GRIMSLEY CONSTRUCTION
HARRIS & HINDRICH DISPLAY CO.
PAUL HINABER
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REFUND NUISANCE ABATEMENT
$1,469.00
$1,469.00
REFUND OVERPAYMENT
$70.03
$70.03
BOND REFUND C9117
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C6913
$50.00
BOND REFUND C6913
$46.16
$96.16
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$28.64
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.80
$31.44
BOND REFUND C8905
$100.00
$100.00
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS GAB
$27,868.38
$27,868.38*
PMT P4R 8408/91
$224.25
$224.25*'
BOND EFU D C8959
$100.00
$100.00
LIQ LIC APP REFUND
$2,750.00
$2,750.00*
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
BOND REFUND C9107
$75.00
BONDC9107
D8/08/91
$35-00
P/RENDING
$304.55$110.00
PZR ENDING 8/08/91
$399,114.92
8R ENDING 8f08Z91
$1,312.45
PZR ENDING 8f%%08Z91
$497.58
8C85391
$39,$75.00 .24
$440,$75.00*
BONDEREFUNDNDING
BOND REFUND C9008
$50.00
$50.00
SPRINKLER SYSTEM
$8,750.00
$8,750.00
SAVINGS BONDS 8R 8J08//91
$450.00
DUE FED DEP PAY 8/OB/91
$2,998.59
DUE FED DEP PAY 808/91
$947.62
DUE FED DEP PAY 8ZOOZ91
$37.61
DUE FED DEP PAY 808%91
$99.38
DUE FED DEP PAY 8/08/91
$11,542.02
$16,075.42*
AUG MEDICAL BENEFIT REIMB
$4,799.68
$4 799.68*(
BOND REFUND C9318
$100.00
100.00
BOND REFUND 1328
$250.00
$250.00
WATER REFUND
$10.28
$10.28
BOND REFUND C9252
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND 1251
$100.00
$100.00
R/E TR TAX REBATE
$296.00
$296.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
JET BUILDERS
RANDY R. JOSEPH
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
KASPER CONSTRUCTION CO.
ROBERT J. KORALIK
STANLEY KORECKY
MELVIN KRUMREY
A. LAMP CONSTRUCTION CO.
R. LAVANT
JIM LILL
JACK LLOYD
MAGIC DRAGON
ERNEST MEHLAN
MOBIL OIL CORPORATION
GEORGE MONTALBANO
NEUMANN CONSTRUCTION
NTN BEARING CORPORATION
OAK TERRACE APTS.
JOHN PELC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PHOENIX BUILDERS
JOHN PUSZKA
RAM CONSTRUCTION
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
SRS INDUSTRIES
TOM STAUFFER
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8115/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND REFUND C8981
DUP R1E TR TAX
$75.00
$232.00
$75.00
$232.00
REFUND
PMT P1R 8%08/91
$254.00
$254.00*
BOND kREFUND 08851
$100.00
$560.00
$100.00
$560.00
R4E TR TAX REBATE
R FUND FINAL WATER BILL
$21.42
$2.16
$23.58
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
BOND REFUND C9843
$100.00
$100.00
SHARED COST SIDEWALK
$9,581.49
$100.00
$9,581.49
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9417
$2.38
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
BOND REFUND C7705
0.00
$1075.00
$1$2.62
.00
BOND REFUND C8751
$
$100.00
$75.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9302
REFUND METER DEPOSIT
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$30.94
3.12
$34.06
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$100.00
$100.06
BOND. REFUND C8874
REFUND DUPLICATE PMTS
$160.00
$160.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$7.68
$76.16
$83.84
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2$.38
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
24
$2.62
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$53.00
MISC EXPENSES
$40.00
$93.00*
MISC EXPENSES
BOND REFUND C8363
$75.00
$75.00
BOND REFUND C9160
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9131
$980.78
$980.78
SERVICES RENDERED
BOND REFUND C9050
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C7510
$55.00
$55.00
BOND MONEY
$650.00
$1,650.00
BOND MONEY
$770.00
BOND MONEY
$700.00
$3,970.00*
BOND MONEY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%15191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
CLEARING
ACCOUNTS
VERTEX CORP.
BOND REFUND C9164
$475.00
$28.95
$475.00
$28.95
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
TR TO POL PENSION FUND
TR TO TRUST FUND
$171.00
$171.00
VILLAGE
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT
OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
PROSPECT
TR TO WATER & SEWER FUND
$1,108.12
$50.00
$1,108.12
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE C6913
REINSPECTION FEE C7510
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8358
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8363
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8539
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8717
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8751
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8981
$25.00
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9008
$15.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9107
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9107
$85.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9164
$
$454.72
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE
TR TO WATER & SEWER FUND
$102,500.00
$127,000.00
TR TO VEHICLE REPL FUND
$15,400.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$9,000.00
TR TO PARKING FUND
$167.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$26,480.72
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$1,500.00
TR TO GENERAL FUND
TR TO POL&FIRE BLDG CONST FUND
$104.43
TR TO GENERAL FUND
$5 450.00
$
TR TO RISK MGT FUND
TR TO RISK MGT FUND
$23,150.00
TR TO RISK MGT FUND
$143,600.00
$454,672.55
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
TR TO IMRF FUND
062.11
$8$630.41
TR TO IMRF FUND
$163.35
TR TO IMRF FUND
$282.96
$9,138.83
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
TR TO IMRF FUND
ALARM CABLE APPLIED AS WATER
$115.87
$11.73
ALARM CABLE APPLIED AS WATER
$
$100.00*
VINCENT
SIGN SERVICE
BOND REFUND 1360
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
WALLEM CONSTRUCTION
JOE WINTZ CONSTRUCTION
WOLF AND COMPANY
ZINGER, THOMAS E.
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND REFUND 08358
$50.00
$75.00
$50.00
$75.00
BOND REFUND C8717
1990/91 AUDIT
$2,100.00
$126,900.00
1990/91 AUDIT
$2,100.00
$4,200.00
BOND REFUND C7752
$100.00
$100.00
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
***TOTAL**
$992,450.14
GENERAL FUND $561,637.46
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $11,542.02
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $2,648.74
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $28,035.38
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $4,799.68
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$2,675.57
WATER & SEWER FUND
$102,863.58
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$126,900.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$135,750.00
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$15,597.71
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
FLOWERS
$69.00
$15.00
FLOWERS
$21.75
FLOWERS
FLOWERS
$35.00
$140.75
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
ROLLS 75TH COMMITEE MTG
PORTFOLIOS FOR TRUSTEES
$7.20
$383.94
$7.20
$383.94
CRESTLINE COMPANY, INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$57.32
$32.25
MISC EXPENSES
$3.58
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$72.25
$165.40*
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$697.29
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15191
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $697.29
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF
INTERNATIONAL PERSONNEL MGMT.
NATIONAL ASSOC. OF SOCIAL WRKR
NEWSCAN, INC.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
RONALD W. PAVLOCK
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BARRY A. SPRINGER
V & G PRINTERS INC.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
PHYSICAL-DORSEY
$293.00
$293.00
REGISTER PAVLOCK
$40.00
$335.00
$40.00*
$335.00
MEMBERSHIP -PIKE
BI -LING SOC WORKER AD
$78.00
$78.00
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$144.00
$144.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$53.78
$53.78
EXPENSES
$273.00
$273.00
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$48.66
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$45.66
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$1,914.05
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$1,230.45
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
JUNE LEGAL SERVICES
$143.08
$42.50
$3,424.40
MISC EXPENSES
$22.30
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$39.91
$60.85
$123.06*
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$52.21
.00
*
$184.00
UES
LEGAL FEES JULY TIF
$303.75
$153.00
$303.75
$153.00
LETTERHEAD
***TOTAL**
$5,457.20
$5,457.20
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
AT&T
016 089 7465 001
$486.76 $486.76
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT BATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$50.00
$2,Q$9.95
$2,081.60
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SERVICE
MISC EXPENSES
$9'95
$6.00
MISC EXPENSES
$5'98
MISC EXPENSES
$3.16
MISC EXPENSES
$12.96
38.05*
MISC EXPENSES
$25.00
25.00
ROBERT TOBA
COMM ASST BD MTG
LETTERHEAD
$153.00
$153.00
V & G PRINTERS INC.
***TOTAL**
$2,784.41
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
$2,784'41
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
$15.00
$15.00
CITY OF SEATTLE
GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION
MANUAL
SPIRAL BINDERS
$115.01
$42.95
$115.01
$42.95
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
CORPORATION
PUBLICATION
MICE COMPUTERS & PRINTER
$144.00
$52.00
$246.00
I.B.M.
AUG MTCE COMPUTER & PRINTER
$46.30
$46.30
ICMA
SOFTWARE REFERENCE GUIDE
$25.00
$25.00*
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
TAX SEMINAR WIDMER
INTEREST CHARGE
300.00
$$21.75
*
$300.00
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
TR TAX TRANS JULY 91
PHOTOGRAPHY WORK
THE PERFECT IMAGE
PHOTOGRAPHY WORK
$5.00
$11.50
PHOTOGRAPHY WORK
$86.50
PHOTOGRAPHY WORK
$23.00
$147.75
PHOTOGRAPHY WORK
$9.24
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$12.05
GENERAL FUND
$539.65
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
MISC EXPENSES
$8.27
$29.56*
PRENTICE HALL, INC.
POLICY & PROC MANUAL
$76.70
$607.50
$76.70
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
JUNE PROGRAMMING SERVICES
$375.00
SERVICES RENDERED
PROGRAMMING SERVICES
$1,788.75
$2,771.25
RING -SIZERS, INC.
SALES TAX SCHEDULES
$96.33
$18.20
$96.33
$18.20
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
Y G PRINTERS INC.
DELIVERY
ANNUAL ANCIAL REPORTS
945.00
$
&
LETTERHEAD
153.00
$1,098.00
XEROX CORP.
JULY 1090 COPIER CHARGES
$2,213.75
$304.50
$2,518.25
XL/DATACOMP INC.
DRY INK
MTCE SERVICE AUGUST
$13.04
$13.04
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$7,562.54
GENERAL FUND
$7,562.54
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
SUBSCRIPTION
X584.00
$220.00
$84.00
$220.00
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
NEWSLETTER PAPER
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$56.28
$56.28
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$26.37
$153.00
$26.37
$153.00
V & G PRINTERS INC.
LETTERHEAD
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$539.65
GENERAL FUND
$539.65
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
MED CLAIMS THRU 846/91
MEDICAL CLAIMS TH U 8/8
$18,384.31
$34,829.41
$53,213.72*
CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS.
RISK MGT SERVICES
SERVICE FEES AUGUST
$500.00
$578.75
$500.00
$578.75
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
SERVICES-BURGER
$53.00
$53.00
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SERVICES NEURERER MILLER
$246.00
$15.00
$246.00*
$15.00
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY A�iSUC.S-C.
SERVICES NEURURER
***TOTAL**
$54,606.47
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$54,606.47
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTROL
$150.00
$260.00
PEST CONTROL
$110.00
$55.00
PEST CONTROL
$95.00
PEST CONTROL
$60.00
PEST CONTROL
$75.00
PEST CONTROL
$80.00
$885.00
BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC.
PEST CONTROL
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$29.00
$139.50
$29.00
$139.50
MID-CONTINENT MKTG. SVCS., LTD
LEAD CHECK ,
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL JAKES
$75.00
$75.00
NCSBCS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$9.23
$15.17
MISC EXPENSES
$2.68
MISC EXPENSES
$11.01
MISC EXPENSES
$125.25
MISC EXPENSES
$8.28
$171.62-
MISC EXPENSES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL HANDBOOK
$60.00
$60.00
PRENTICE-HALL, INC.
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
SOIL & MATERIAL CONSULTANTS, I
XL/DATACOMP INC.
YORK ENG. & SURVEYING SERV.INC
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MATERIAL TESTING
MTCE SERVICE AUGUST
SURVEYING SERVICES
SURVEYING SERVICES
$2,423.16 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
$160.00
$13.04
$750.00
$300.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 9
TOTAL
$160.00
$13.04
$1,050.00
$2,583.16
$160.00
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALLEN GROUP INC.
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
THOMAS F. DALEY
DETROIT ARMOR CORPORATION
FRIES AUTO INC.
HAINES & COMPANY
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LITTLE AMERICA
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
PARTS
$271.09
$11-4.91
PARTS
PARTS
$223.08
PARTS
$57.99
$26.61
PARTS
PARTS
$148.72
$842.40
MTCE SUPPLIES
$156.00
21.26
$156.00
$21.26
FUEL #593-057-401-6
$ 09.20
$209.20
REPLACE PANIC BAR
WASH PLAN JULY 91
$280.00
$130.61
$280.00
$130.61
EXPENSES
RANGE RENOVATION
$31,88200.28
$31$5220.28
12SMOINE LEASE SERVICE
$186.87
$109.43
$186.87 i
$109.43
MTCE & COPIES
$29.91
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
SERVICE
$100.00
$429.91
PRISONER FOOD JULY 91
$107.20
$75.23
$107.20
$75.23
MAP LAMPS
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
LEE AUTO PARTS
MIDWEST TRAINING ACADEMY
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
DAVID T. NICHOLSON
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
RAY O'HERRON CO., INC.
SUALITY YSTEMS AUTOFORMPARTS ON CENTRAL
TRI -R SIGNS
TRW CREDIT DATA DIVISION
WILLIAM M. WILSON'S SONS, INC.
XL DATACOMP INC.
JO EPH ZIOLKOWSKI
POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
$57.43
PARTS
$28.71
$107.12
$193.26
PARTS
REGISTER EDWARDS SCHMITZ
$190.00
$190.00*
PARTS
$30.66
$58.92
$89.58
PARTS
EXPENSES
$280.31 $280.31
$163.78
SUPPLIES
'�`o' "
$10.00
SUPPLIES
$2.97
SUPPLIES
$10.88
$49.57
SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT
$475.00
$1,965.83
$2,440.83
EQUIPMENT
PARTS JULY 91
$595.75
$595.75
DELINQUENT NOTICES
$273.19
$30.00
$273.19
$30.00
BACK FENDER P-5
CD1060010677 SERVICES
$6.45
$67.72
$6.45
$67.72
MTCE SUPPLIES
MTCE SERVICE AUGUST
$65.20
$158.10
$65.20
$158.10
EXPENSES
***TOTAL**
$39,402.35
$7,323.58 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND
$32,078.77
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ARLINGTON TRANSMISSIONS
TRANSMISSION REPAIR
$375.00
$25.00
$375.00
$25.00*
BUSINESS & PROFESSIONAL RESEAR
REGISTER PEYTON
CLEAN & DETAIL INTERIOR
$50.00
$50:00
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
SERVICE
$163.78
$163.78
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE,
SERVICE
$110.78
$9.03
$210.78
$9.03
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BA77-JT-2404-A
6HRS ON LINE TIME
$96.00
CONNECT INC.
NETWORK CHARGES
$16.00
$212.00
$112.00
$212.00
FIRETAC SYSTEMS
SUPPLIES
TIRES
$60.00
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$20.00
$80.00
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
$270.51
$18.75
$270.51
HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$190.57
SUPPLIES
$121.60
$109.43
$330.92
$109.43
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
MICE & COPIES
OXYGEN & GOGGLES
$21.20
$21.20
IGE, INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$480.00
$89.97
$489.97
SERVICE
$258.41
$258.41
KAR PRODUCTS INC
PARTS
PARTS
$121.31
$121.31
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
STORAGE BOXES
$ $44.80
$44
$44.16 $122.16 $44.40
MAYO CLINIC HEALTH LETTER
SUBSCRIPTION
$83.65
NAPA--HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
PARTS
$14.10
PARTS
$78.62
PARTS
$35.59
PARTS
$21.03
PARTS
$$7.55
$258.44*
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PARTS
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$7.59
$37.98
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$21.13
$9.00
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$21.69`
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$18.25
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$6.40
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$40.33
$162.37*
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$162'86
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$250'42
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$69.99
$483.27
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
SIANA BAKERY
SPECIALTY VEHICLE SERVICE
SUPERIOR AMBULANCE
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN.
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
PASTRY HAZMAT CLASS $85.08
VALVE SEAL KITS $75.97
REGISTER CHRISTIANSON $50.00
SUPPLIES $65.13
SUPPLIES $70.35
PARTS $226.44
PARTS $34.94
***TOTAL**
$4,146.58 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
PAGE 12
TOTAL
$85.08
$75.97
$50.00
$135.48
$261.38
$4,417.09
$270.51
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
BUDGET SIGN COMPANY METAL SIGNS $217.50 $217.50
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS SIGN MATERIAL $155.70 $155.70
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $373.20
GENERAL FUND $373.20
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
RITA ADAMCZYK
JULY DRIVER
REIMB
$3.00
$359.40
$3.00
$359.40
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
SENIOR TAXI
JULY DRIVER
RIDES
REIMB
$15.00
$15.00
WILL ASHLEY
LEONARD W. BAZAN
JULY DRIVER
REIMB
$21.00
$21.00
VENDOR
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
BOWEN HARDWARE CO
CARSON PIRIE SCOTT
COMMUNITY CAB CO.
ELK GROVE TAXI
HAZEL FRICKE
MICHELLE GATTAS
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LISA LEVIN
RAY LUNDIN
EARLE 14ATTSON
NATIONAL ASSN. OF SOCIAL WORKE
RICHARD NORAK
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OTTO SCHERR
KATY SCHULTZ
JEANNE SHERMAN
SPRINGHOUSE BOOK CO.
BERTHA STEIL
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC
V & G PRINTERS INC.
KATHI WESLEY
HELEN WHITLOCK
VIRGINIA ZITO
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
COOLERS
$36.34
$36.34
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$589.99
$149.95
$589.99
$149.95
SENIOR TAXI RIDES JULY
$65.00
$65.00
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
SERVICE
SERVICE
$41.13
$441.13
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$7.000
$12.00
$9.00
JULY DRIVER REIMB
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$
$12.00
MEMBERSHIP
$170.00
$170.00
JULY DRIVER REIMB
OFFICE SUPPLIES
75.80
$33.00
$$3.00
.80
MISC EXPENSES
$17.00
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$92.35
$142.35*
JULY DRIVER REIMB _
$ 12.00
$150.00
$12.00
INTERN STIPEND
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$24.00
$174.00
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$19.50
$6.00 $6.00
.50
PUBLICATION
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$ 12.00
$12.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$140.00
$300.00
$440.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
BUSINESS CARDS
$156.00
$156.00
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$6.00
$9.00
$6.00
JULY DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
JULY DRIVER REIMB
***TOTAL**
$2,975.46
$2,975.46
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
J.A. JOHNSON PAVING CO.
W. LOCKWOOD MARTLING
MICHAEL J. MORAN
NORTH WEST HOUSING PARTNERSHIP
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
QUALEX, INC.
REI TITLE SERVICES
GILBERT SLADZIEN
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
V & G PRINTERS INC.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
APA DUES -FARNHAM
DOGWOOD LN RECONSTRUCTION
$52.50
$46,797.56
$52.50
$46,797.56
SERVICES RENDERED
$1`2
$1,100.89
SERVICES S9803
$50.0073.00
$
$323.00
CDBG 804 S HILUSI
1SDT QUARTER PAYMENT
$625.00
$33.98
$625.00
$33.98
OFFICE SUPPLIES
CMAs HEARING NOTICE
$42.20
$42.20
MISC EXPENSES
$63.16
$19.25
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$20.00
$102.41*
HOMETOWN DAYS FILM
$19.52
$150.00
$19.52
$150.00
TITLE TRACT SEARCH
CDBG 1908 YUMA PLACE
$6,850.00
$6,850.00
HLTH CARE SERVICE
$1,333.33
$153.00
$1,333.33
$153.00
LETTERHEAD
***TOTAL**
$57,583.39
$1,442.30 COMMUNITY
DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$56,141.09
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ABBORENO CONSTRUCTION CO., INC CATCH BASIN INLET REPAIR 30
CATCH BASIN INLET REPAIR $,000.00
$4,263.00 $34,263.00*
ACTIVE ALARM COMPANY, INC. BATTERIES $44.00
REPLACED SMOKE DETECTOR $60.00 $104.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $26.86
SUPPLIES $32.50
SUPPLIES $4.03
SUPPLIES $56.86
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%1591
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
SUPPLIES
3.82
$5.91
$129.98
SUPPLIES
$118.36
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
61.20
PARTS
$216.25
PARTS
55.85
PARTS
$115`$$
PARTS
PARTS
13.11
$138.19
$718.94
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
OPTICOM CALLS
REPAIR OPTICOM
$603.00
$432.00
$1,035.00
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING
IDOT SURFACE
$1 334.80
686.60
$1,334.80
$686.60
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
COLD PATCH
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$568.1$
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$698.95
$1,267.13
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
SUPPLIES
$16.01
$86.84
$102.85
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
SUPPLIES
MICE AGREEMENT
$147.00
$163.32
$147.00
$163.32
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
SERVICES
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
SANTOS BAUTISTA
BILL'S LAWN & POWER
SUPPLIES
$33.93
$26.69
$60.62
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
SUPPLIES
MICE SUPPLIES
$307.72
$67.00
$307.72
$67.00
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
VEHICLE WASH JULY 91
S%C SIDEWALK PROGRAM
$34,252.42
$34,252.42
C A CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
CLLEANING SUPPLIES
$694.65
CADE INDUSTRIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$200.88
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$200.88
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$200.88
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$200.87
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$200.87
$200.87
$1,899.90
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$130.69
$130.69
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SERVICE
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$205.11
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$288.10
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$89.35
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
CITRON CHEMICAL, INC.
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COURTESY HOME CENTER
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
ENGINEMASTERS, INC.
FINISHMASTER, INC.
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO
GATEWAY SUPPLY CO.
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
HELLER LUMBER CO.
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
ILLINOIS RECOVERY SYSTEMS
INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER,
NELS J. JOHNSON
A. LAMP CONSTRUCTION CO.
LEE JENSEN SALES CO., INC.
LINDE GASES OF THE MIDWEST
LEE AUTO PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8115191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$6.94
$206.54
$796.04
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$562.46
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$150.00
$712.46
SUPPLIES
JANITORIAL SERVICE 7116-31
$604.50
$2,076.00
$604.50
$2,076.00
SERVICE
$9,208`23
$6,615.60
n4c oma, 83
�1J,OLJ.
SERVICE
ROUND -UP SPRAY
$23.96
$106.10
$23.96
$106.10
SUPPLIES
$54.42
$54.42
PARTS
SUPPLIES
$92.76
SUPPLIES
$62.13
$7.94
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$53.02
$284.76
$500.61
SUPPLIES
U.S. NYLON FLAGS
$87.20
U.S. NYLON FLAGS
87.20
87.20
187.20
U.S. NYLON FLAGS
U.S. NYLON FLAGS
U.S. NYLON FLAGS
$87.20
$436.00
UNIFORM SERVICES
$147`75
$147.75
$295.50
UNIFORM SERVICE
$23.40
$23.40
FAUCETS
$278.10
$278.10
STAIN
$13.04
$13.04
SUPPLIES
$56.55
$56.55
SUPPLIES
REMOVE ANTIFREEZE
$35.00
$1,601.86
$35.00
$1,601.86
STEEL
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$,692
$ 99,569 .00
$15261.00
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
SHARED COST SIDEWALK
,569.00
$14,111.30
$14,,111.30
SUPPLIES
$115.40
$48.90
$164.30
SUPPLIES
$132.30
$132.30
STARGON GAS
$15`45
PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
PARTS
$85.52
PARTS
$44.75
PARTS
$11.55
PARTS
$6.55
PARTS
$20.80
PARTS
$33.90
PARTS
17.56
PARTS
$17.56
$253.64
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
PARTS
$56.01
$14.61
PARTS
PARTS
22.72
PARTS
$11.79-
$81.55
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
REPAIR COMPRESSOR SR CNTR
$748.10
$394.21
$1,142.31
REPAIR BOILER
$90.26
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$5.38
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
161.89
SUPPLIES
$437.45
$694.98
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
SUPPLIES MTG TRNG
$22.56
$81.22
$22.56*
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
EXPENSES
$`80
EXPENSES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$9.92
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$20.20
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$11.69
$7.70
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$2.00
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$22.13
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$
$174.62*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$290.12
$11.76
$301.88 �-
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
PARTS
PARTS JULY 91
$194.06
$544.07
$738.13
PARTS JULY 91
$42.65
ROWLAND'S EQUIPMENT, INC.
SUPPLIES
$27.30
$69.95
STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$21.34
PLUMBINGMSUPPLIESPLIES
$16.33
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8115%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
STANTON POWER RODDING
CATCH BASIN INLET CLNG
$1,496.00
$70.80
$1,496.00
$70.80
STEINER ELECTRIC COMPANY
SUPPLIES
PW CABLE BILL
$9.50
TCI OF ILLINOIS
TECH SYN CORPORATION
MICE SUPPLIES
$68.41
$825.00
68.41
$68.41
$825.00
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
REGISTER NEURURER
$458.00
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
EQUIPMENT
EUIPMENT
1,042.00
$1,124.00
EQUIPMENT
$125.00
$2,624.00
$125.00
W AY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO.
CHAIN SAW CHAIN
MP PUBLIC WORKS SHIRTS
$626.06
$626.06
WY-KENRD
WILLIAM M. WILSON'S SONS, INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$67.72
$67'72
***TOTAL**
$139,236.69
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
$128,962.09 MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND
$7,650.60
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$2,624.00
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
$38.72
$127.72
SUPPLIES
$25.27
SUPPLIES
$339.66
SUPPLIES
$6.95
SUPPLIES
$78.66
$616.98
SUPPLIES
$280.48
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
$216.25
PARTS
$63.83
$74.36
PARTS
$74.21
PARTS
$8.80
$717.93
PARTS
ADVANCE EXPENSES
$1,189.00
$1,189.00
GLEN ANDLER
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
FILM & PROCESSING
FILM & PROCESSING
$43.30
$58.65
$101.95
R. I. BUSSE INC.
PULVERIZED TOP SOIL
91
$426.00
$72.25
$426.00
$72.25
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
VEHICLE WASH JULY
YELLOW KNIT GLOVES
$318.00
$318.00
CADS INDUSTRIES
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$205.12
$83.85
$205.12
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BB72-JT-5608-D
BB72--JT-8548-A
$11.99
$95.84
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK
PER10
VILLAGEISHARE SFIXEDWCOSTS-JAWA
110.00
$106,572.00
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA.
$1681405.00
$17,864.00
$302,951.00
POWER COSTS-JAWA
$6.96
FINISHMASTER, INC.
SUPPLIES
PUMP REPLACEMENT
$ 2 2$6.52 $2,296
FLOW -TECHNICS
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
EXTINGUISHER SERVICE
$20.00
$147.75
$20.40
G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO
UNIFORM SERVICES
$1
$2 .5
UNIFORM SERVICE
FILM PROCESSING
$9.56
$9
$9.75
$9.566
H R HART PHOTO
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT
$288.82
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER
$115.37
MTCE AGREEMENT
AUG MTCE COMPUTER & PRINTER
$52.00
$650.19
MTCE SUPPLIES
$42.52
$42.52
IBT, INC.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$53.70
$18.75
SERVICE
$300.00
SERVICE
$17.50
SERVICE
$44.19
SERVICE
$36.60
$470.74
SERVICE
SUPPLIES
$92.50
',
$92.50.42
ITEC
JULIE, INC.
JUNE 91 BILLING
$180.42
$528.00
$
$55 2$28=.0000
LAND AND LAKES CO
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
REFUSE DISPOSAL
CREDIT OFFICE SUPPLIES
$1.40 -
$11.68
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$94.08
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$31.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
LEE AUTO PARTS
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK CENTER
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
NOVAK & PARKER INC.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 811591
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
CREDIT PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
1818 142 BONITA DR
117 N FF77AVERLY
NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VIDEO TAPES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
EXPENSES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$19.07
$168.93
$3.87
$27.09
$17.60
$34.28
$6.69
$7.15
$61.00
$33.90
$20.00-
$27.09-
$23.28-
$14.61
$15.85
$14.63
$18.75
17.36
39.68
$16.92
$24.48
$65.11
$23.80
$43.27
$212.52
$67.20
$34.90
$27.26
$29.00
$8.22
$48.00
$9.37
$71.43
$12.66
$60.83
$1.32
PAGE 20
TOTAL
$154.79
$290.14
$30.46
$50.74
$81.08
$65.11
$346.79
$34.90
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
POSTMASTER
POWER PAK, INC.
PARTS ON
RAINBOW 1UALITYUHR PHOTO EXPCENTRAL
ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO.
SANTA ANITA MANUFACTURING CORP
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
V & G PRINTERS INC.
WEARGUARD
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
WILLIAM M. WILSON'S SONS, INC.
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER & SEWER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$'8
$1.10
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$11'76
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$57.97
$66.56
$406.46*
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$13.98
$13.98
PARTS
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$531.64
$465.83
$531.64*
$465.83
BATTERIES
PARTS JULY 91
$647.08
$647.08
FILM & PROCESSING
$10.79
$10.49
FILM & PROCESSING
$18.40
$39.68
FILM PROCESSING
$105.92
$105.92
SUPPLIES
MANUALS
$168.55
$168.55
OVERPMT ON INV 10875
$3.00 -
$54.73
$51.73
SUPPLIES
AIR IMPACT WRENCH
$85.00
$36.34
$85.00
$36.34
OXM122 EXCHANGE TANKS
$180.00
$180.00
PRINTING SERVICES
MP PUBLIC WORKS SHIRTS
$626.05
$626.05
PARTS
$59.14
$5.41
$64.55
PARTS
MICE SUPPLIES
$67.72
$67.72
PARTS
$81.76
$81.50
$
PARTS
$667.90
PARTS
$68.00
PARTS
REPAIR SLEEVES
$245.02
$1,176.18
***TOTAL**
$316,983.70`
$316,983.70
GENERAL FUND
$222,805.02
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS C
LAND LEASE
$1,380.46
$1,380.46
***TOTAL**
$1,380.46
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,380.46
*************#****#************#***********#****************************************#*******************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
EQUIPMENT
$3,975.00
$3,975.00
ABM, INC.
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
JULY 91 COLLECTION
$104,219.37
$29,606.96
JULY 91 COLLECTION
$13,533.45
JULY 91 COLLECTION
JULY 91 COLLECTION
$5,560.45
JULY 91 COLLECTION
$4,592.72
$1,475.00
$157,512.95
$1,475.00
DARWILL PRESS
BIN RECEIPTS
DEPOSIT POSTAGE DUE ACCT
$30.00
$30.00*
POSTMASTER
REHRIG PACIFIC CO.
RECYCLING BINS
921.10
$,843.64
$5,843.64
RECYCLING BINS
$19,311.60
RECYCLING BINS
RECYCLING BINS
$20 661.74
$53,738.08
ROUTE 12 RENTAL CO., INC.
HAND TRUCK RENTAL
490.95
$5,490.04
$490.95
$5,490.04
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
EQUITY CHARGE
PRINTING SERVICES
$93.00
$93.00
V & G PRINTERS INC.
***TOTAL**
$222,805.02
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
$222,805.02
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
E & H UTILITY SALES
FREUND INTERNATIONAL
FULTON CONTRACTING CO.
GENERAL DATACOMM, INC.
GOODYEAR COMMERCIAL TIRE & SER
RANDY HAGGERMAKER
ROBERT HASENJAEGER
HELLER LUMBER CO.
HUDEC FENCE
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER,
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
MCMASTER-CARR
CONNIE MCMILLAN
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
NETWORK COMMUNCIATION TECH.INC
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$5.78
$17.30
SUPPLIES
$13.00
SUPPLIES
$27.81
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$8.76
$72.65
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES
$27.62
$11.81
27.62
811.81
4" RUBBER BASE
CLEAN FLOORS&CARPET OLD PW
$435.00
$435.00
SUPPLIES
GLASS RESET BANK BLDG
$ 130.00
$130.00
SUPPLIES
$170.30
$170.30
$340.60
SUPPLIES
$159.40
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$258.58
$221.24
$639.22
SUPPLIES
1 INTL CAB & CHASSIS
$35,924.08
$3,000.00
$35,924.08*
$3,000.00
RELOCATION SIREN
$756.48
$756.48
EQUIPMENT
$319.92
$319.92
TIRES
PAINTING 101 S MAPLE ST
$1,500.00
$185.000
$1,500.00
$185.00
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
SUPPLIES
$19.20
SUPPLIES
$9.33
$47.73
SUPPLIES
INSTALL FENCE
$2`445.00
$
5-00
$2$445.00
REPAIRS OLD P.W.BLDG
$517.87
STEEL
$518.46
$1,036.33
STEEL
SQUAD CONVERSION P-2
$926.14
$103.14
$926.14
$103.14 '
SUPPLIES
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
$900.00
$900.00
PARTS
$7.90
$7.90
$15.80
PARTS
INSTALL EQUIPMENT
$1,17.00
$1,430.00
SUPPLIES
$1117.33
$372.61
SUPPLIES
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ASSOCIATED ATTRACTIONS ENT.INC
BULLSHIRTS TOO
COURTESY HOME CENTER
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
SUPPLIES
JULY 4TH PARADE EXPENSES
RECYCLING SHIRTS 4TH PARADE
SUPPLIES
INSTALL BANNERS
U.S. NYLON FLAGS
REMOVAL 4TH BANNERS
$5.62
$2,400.00
$156.00
$16.50
$262.50
$325.00
$150.00
$5.62
$2,400.00
$156.00
$16.50
$737.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
SUPPLIES
$333.84
SUPPLIES
$190.96
SUPPLIES
92.54
$24.15
$1,131.43
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
SUPPLIES
PARTS JULY 91
$10.34
$772.00
$10.34
$772.00
FRANCES M. RYAN
FLOOD PREVENTION REBATE
FEES JULY MP HIST MUSEUM
$877.50
$877.50
BARRY Az SPRINGER
STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY
PLUMRTNG SUPPLIES
X141.6,
$3,395.00
$141'6`
$3,395.00
VANITIES INC.
RELOCATION OF POLICE DESK
$458.00
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
$458.00
EQUIPMENT
$458.00
EQUIPMENT
$458.00
00
$2,290.00
WEST TOWN REFRIGERATION CORP.
REPLACENBOILER TUBES
$1$265.00
$1,159.30
$1,265.00
$1,159.30
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
***TOTAL**
$61,465.26
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND
$1,857.00 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$2,280.83 POLICE & FIRE BUILDING CONST
$40,837.07
$13,467.86
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$3,022.50
*x***********xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx****xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ASSOCIATED ATTRACTIONS ENT.INC
BULLSHIRTS TOO
COURTESY HOME CENTER
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
SUPPLIES
JULY 4TH PARADE EXPENSES
RECYCLING SHIRTS 4TH PARADE
SUPPLIES
INSTALL BANNERS
U.S. NYLON FLAGS
REMOVAL 4TH BANNERS
$5.62
$2,400.00
$156.00
$16.50
$262.50
$325.00
$150.00
$5.62
$2,400.00
$156.00
$16.50
$737.50
********************************************************************************************************
PENSION FUNDS
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$200.00
$883.22
PAGE 25
CHARLES
VILLAGE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
AUGUST 91 PENSION
SEPT MEDICAL INSURANCE
$484.50
$1,482.33
$484.50
$1,482.33
PAYMENT DATE 8%15%91 _
WATKINS
AUGUST DISABILITY BENEFIT
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
***TOTAL**
$3,050.05
PENSION
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
HELLER LUMBER CO.
SUPPLIES
$12.30
$18.98
$31.28
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$440.00
$440.00
STEVEN R. JENKINS CO., INC.
***TOTAL**
$3,786.90
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
$3,786.90
********************************************************************************************************
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FLOOD LOAN INT 8/1/91
$423.30
$3,220.43
$3,643.73
FLOOD LOAN PRIM 8/1/91
***TOTAL**
$3,643.73
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
$3,643.73
********************************************************************************************************
PENSION FUNDS
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
WITHHOLDING TAXES
$200.00
$883.22
$200.00
$883.22
CHARLES
VILLAGE
W. NICK
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AUGUST 91 PENSION
SEPT MEDICAL INSURANCE
$484.50
$1,482.33
$484.50
$1,482.33
PAUL H.
WATKINS
AUGUST DISABILITY BENEFIT
***TOTAL**
$3,050.05
PENSION
FUNDS
VENDOR
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/15/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2
PAGE 26
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$2,166.83
$1,923,784.16
DATE RUN 8115191
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 27
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID-APPBAR
TIME RUN 12.20.53
SUMMARY BY FUND 8%15191
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$957,443.79
21
FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND
$1,857.00
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$7,810.60
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$58,816.66
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,542.02
31
BENEFIT TRUST #2
$2,166.83
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$419,847.28
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$4,029.20
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$167,737.07
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$82,641.85
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$173,004.11
53
POLICE & FIRE BUILDING CONST
$13,467.86
56
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$3,022.50
74
ESCROWMDEPOSITWFUNDD
$15,597.71
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,923,784.16
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
July 1, 1991 - July 31, 1941
Fund
Revenues
Expenses
Fund
Balance
for
for
Balance
June 30, 1491
July 1991
July 1991
Julv 31.1941
General and Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,778,755
$ 958,346
$1,428,621
$ 1,308,480
Flood Control Revenue Fund
2,867,773
7,402
90,325
2,784,850
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
844,857
100,650
178,368
767,139
Community Development Block Grant
106,207
16,000
21,833
100,374
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
< 82,434>
34,553
54,446
< 102,827>
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
3,582,817
420,564
406,871
3,596,510
Parking System Revenue Fund
105,711
15,981
< 3,526>
125,218
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
837,228
200,854
160,106
877,476
Vehicle Replacement Fund
774,078
<123,804>
8,190
642,079
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
< 91,070>
21,030
4,284
< 74,324>
Corporate Purpose Const 1991
448,416
2,470
3,043
498,343
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
< 142,485>
2,145
-
< 140,340>+
Police &-Fire Building Construction
6,526,103
156,413
135,764
6,546,752
Debt Service Funds
999,995
4,918
157,708
847,205
Trust & Agenc�Funds
Flexcomp Trust
-
-
-
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
-
-
-
-
Police Pension Fund
16,124,732
143,455
42,349
16,226,338
Firemen's Pension Fund
18,113,185
74,700
43,756
18,144,129
Benefit Trust Funds
255.261
1.544
2 167
254,643
553,099.624
$2.037,721
52,734.805
$52,402,545
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC'D X
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL
GENERAL FUND
TAX REVENUE
1-000-00-4001
TAXES -CORPORATE CURRENT
1,554,800
388,698
1,554,800-
1,554,800-
100-
1-000-00-4002
TAXES -CORPORATE PRIOR
1,799,500
449,874
72,580
1,882
1,726,920-
1,726,920-
96-
1-000-00-4004
TAXES -GARBAGE CURRENT
813,300
203,325
813,300-
813,300-
100-
1-000-00-4005
TAXES -GARBAGE PRIOR
941,250
235,311
37,965
984
903,285-
903,285-
96-
1-000-00-4010
TAXES -RD & BRDG CURRENT
12,000
3,000
- 12,000-
12,000-
100-
1-000-00-4011
TAXES -RD & GROG PRIOR
12,000
3,OOD
497
13
11,503-
11,503-
96-
1-000-00-4013
RETAILERS OCCUPATION TAX6,100,000
1,524,999
454,367
454,367
5,645,633-
5,645,633-
93-
1-000-00-4014
SALES TAX -SPECIAL PAYMNT
0
1-000-00-4015
FOREIGN FIRE INS TAX
27,500
6,873
27,500-
27,500-
100-
1-000-00-4016
AUTO RENTAL TAX
6,500
1,623
603
563
5,897-
5,897-
91-
1-000-00-4017
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX
450,000
112,500
133,301
48,308
316,699-
316,699-
70-
1-000-00-4018
FOOD & BEVERAGE TAX
550,000
137,499
137,537
52,218
412,463-
412,463-
75-
1-000-00-4019
HOTEL/MOTEL TAX
35,000
8,748
35,000-
35,000-
100-
1-000-00-4020
ELECTRONICS GAME TAX
12.000
3,000
12,000-
12,000-
100 -
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
2,313,850
3,078,450
836,850
558,335
1,477,000-
11,477,000-
496 -
FEE REVENUE
`
1-000-00-4101
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
196,000
47,499
57,762
22,959
132,238-
132,238-
70-
1-000-00-4102
ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES
37,500
9,375
11,898
3,691
25,602-
25,602-
68-
1-000-00-4103
REINSPECTION FEES
10,000
2,499
2,295
2.295
7,705-
7,705-
77-
1-000-00-4104
PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
17,500
4,374
7,853
2,822
9,647-
9,647-
55-
1-000-00-4105
PLAN EXAMINATION FEES
37,500
9,375
14,331
5,153
23,169-
23,169-
62-
1-000-00-4106
STREET OPENING FEES
600
150
546
50
54-
54-
9-
1-000-00-4107
VEHICLE LICENSE FEES
732,500
183,123
661,126
17,851
71,375-
71,374-
10-
1-000-00-4108
DOG LICENSES
12,000
3,000
10,372
223
1,629-
1,628-
14-
1-000-00-4109
LIQUOR LICENSES
127,500
31,875
116,628
10
10,873-
10,872-
9-
1-000-00-4110
BUSINESS LICENSES
162,500
40,623
12,650
2,565
149,850-
149,850-
92-
1-000-00-4112
PUBLIC IMPR INSPECTIONS
32,500
8,124
17,204
11371
15,296-
15,296-
47-
1-000-00-4113
RENTAL FEES
0
1-000-00-4114
FEES -BOARD OF APPEALS
17,500
4,374
5,800
1,800
11,700-
11,700-
67-
1-000-00-4115
CENTEL FRANCHISE FEES
25,500
6,375
12,605
12,605
12,895-
12,895-
51-
1-000-00-4116
BELL SYS FRANCHISE FEES
92,500
23,124
7,9()6
7,756
84,594-
84,594-
91-
1 -OW -00-4119
ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS
13,000
3,249
5,077
1,277
7,923-
7,923-
61-
1-000-00-4120
FALSE ALARM FEES
10,000
2,499
1,220
735
8,780-
8,780-
88-
1-000-00-4121
CABLE TV FRANCHISE FEES
175,000
43,749
15,240
14,991)
159,760-
159,760-
91-
1-000-00-4123
LANDLORD/TENANT FEES
37.5
9.375
36,402
450
1,098-
1,048-
3-
TOTAL FEE REVENUE
1,731,100
432,762
996,915
109,003
734,188-
734,185-
42 -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1-000-00-4150
STATE INCOME TAX
1,725,000
431,250
375,015
183,104
1,349,985-
1,349,985-
78-
1-000-00-4151
STATE SALES TAX
102,500
25,623
16,801
85,699-
85,699-
84-
1-000-00-4152
STATE INCOME TAX-SURCHG
0
1-000-00-4153
STATE USE TAX
152,500
38,124
152,500-
152,500-
100-
1-000-00-4154
GRANT -SR. CITIZEN TAXI
0
1-000-00-4156
EMPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS
23,000
5,748
2,700
675
20,300-
20,300-
88-
1-000-00-4158
CHARITABLE GAMES TAX
2,000
498
2,000-
2,000-
100-
1-000-00-4160
RECYCLING GRANT
0
1-000-00-4161
GRANT - POLICE M E G
10,000
2,499
10,000-
10,OOD-
100-
1-000-00-4162
GRANT-ILEC POLICE TRNG
22,500
5,625
22,500-
22,500-
100-
1-000-00-4163
GRANT -STATE FIRE TRAING
15,000
3,750
15,000-
15,000-
100-
1-000-00-4164
PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX
130,500
32,625
130,500-
130,500-
100-
FL004 CONTROL REVENUE FUND
TAX REVENGE
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
2
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING
7/31/91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR MO
UNREC'D
%
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
BALANCE
SAL
r.FNERAL FUND
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1-000-00-4165
PERSONAL PROP REPL R&B
3,5
873
1,404
1,312
2 096-
2,096-
60 -
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2,186,500
546,615
395,920
185,091
1,790,580-
1,790,580-
82 -
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
1-000-00-4175
W & S SERVICE CHARGE
225,000
56,250
45,000
22,500
180,000-
180,000-
80-
1-000-00-4176
PARKING SERVICE CHARGE
15,000
3,750
3,000
1.500
12,000-
12,000-
SO -
1 -000-00-4177
MAINT. OF STATE HIGHWAYS
52,600
13,149
11,202
41,398-
41,398-
79-
1-000-00-4178
FOREST RIVER RURAL FPD
13,500
3,375
13,500-
13,500-
100-
1-000-00-4180
AMBULANCE TRNSPRT FEE
50,000
12.498
9,941
2.774
40,059-
40.059-
80
TOTAL SERVICE
CHARGE REVENUE
356,100
89,022
69,143
26,774
286,957-
286,957-
81 -
PARKING REVENUE
1-000-00-4216
FINES - LOCAL
195,000
48,750
31,156
10,650
163,844-
163,844-
84-
1-000-00-4217
FINES - CIRCUIT COURT
175,000
43,749
175,000-
175,000-
100-
1-000-00-4218
FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES
600
150
205
130
395-
395-
66 -
TOTAL PARKING REVENUE
370,600
92,649
31,361
10,780
339,239-
339,239-
92 -
OTHER REVENUE
1-ODO-00-4231
SALE OF CODE BOOKS
1,500
375
308
89
1,192-
1,192-
79-
1-000-00-4232
SALE OF REFUSE STICKERS
121
121
121
121
0
1-000-00-4233
SALE OF REFUSE BAGS
325,000
81,249
97,114
36,594
227,886-
227,886-
70-
1-000-00-4234
SALE OF RECYCLING BINS
1,000
249
24
6
976-
976-
98-
1-000-00-4235
RECYCLING INCOME
45,000
11.250
45,000-
45,000-
100-
1-000-00-4243
SENIOR CENTER REVENUE
7,500
1,875
1,577
327
5,923-
5,923-
79-
1-000-00-4244
SPECIAL DETAIL REVENUE
12,000
3,000
2,798
471
9,202-
9,202-
77-
1-000-00-4245
REIMB-SERVICES&PROPERTY
25,000
6,249
4,676
1,103
20,324-
20,324-
81-
1-000-00-4246
REIMB - YOUTH COUNSELING
38,000
9,498
7,234
30,766-
30,766-
81-
1-000-00-4247
POLICE & FIRE REPORTS
13,000
3,249
2,194
459
10,806-
10,806-
83-
1-000-00-4248
INTEREST INCOME
150,000
37,500
37,699
11,678
112,301-
112,301-
75-
1-000-00-4249
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME
17,500
4,374
9,520
40
7,980-
7,980-
46-
1-000-00-4250
BANK INTEREST INCOME
22,500
5,625
3,514
1,710
18,986-
18,986-
84-
1-000-00-4253
INTEREST -ESCROW FUND
80,000
19,998
20,068
7,735
59,932-
59,932-
75-
1-000-00-4255
FLOOD LOANS INTEREST
11,000
2,748
2,460
742
8,540-
8,540-
78-
1-000-00-4256
FLOOD LOANS PRINCIPAL
40,000
9,999
7,780
2,381
32,220-
32,220-
81-
1-000-00-4260
FLOOD ENGINEERING REIMB
155,000
38,748
155,000-
155,000-
100-
1-000-00-4264
REINS -CENTRAL ROAD
0
1-000-00-4267
WOLF ROAD REIMBURSEMENT
0
1 -b00 -OD -4270
PROSPECT AVE PRKG REIMB
93,650
23,412
93,650
0
1-000-00-4275
SHARED COST -SIDEWALK
25,000
6,249
20,672
160
4,328-
4,328-
17-
1-000-00-4276
SHARED COST -TREE REPLC
60,000
15,000
5,950
54,050-
54,050-
90-
1-000-00-4277
FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM
40,000
9,999
8,075
4,750
31,925-
31,925-
80-
1-000-00-4299
GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT_
52
3-
52
52
0
TOTAL OTHER
REVENUE
1, 162,650
290,646
325,486
68,363
837,164=
837,164-
72 -
TOTAL GENERAL
FUND
8,120,800
4,530,144
2,655,675
958,346
5,465,128-
15,465,125-
-
190------------------------------------------
FL004 CONTROL REVENUE FUND
TAX REVENGE
MOTOR FUEL.TAX.,FUNR
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
305,130
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
137,996 16,000
PAGE
3
55-
23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
1,150,000
287,499
283,973
96,155
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING
7/31/91
75-
22-000-00-4242 REIMBURSEMT ON PROJECTS
35,000
8,748
1991-92
Y -T -D Y -T -D
CUR MO
UNREC'D
100-
X
20,000
BUDGET
ESTIMATE ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
BALANCE
BAL
21-000-00-4012 HOME RULE SALES TAX
450,000
112,500
53
450,000-
450,000-
100-
21-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS
1,400,000
349,998 2,880,983
301,320
1,480,983
1,480,983
106
21-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
50 000
12.498 15.241
7.402
34,759-
34.759-
70 -
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
1,900,001)
474,996 2,896,224
7,402
996,224
996,224
52
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND
------------------------------------------
1,900,000
474,996 2,896,224
7,402
996,224
996,224
52
MOTOR FUEL.TAX.,FUNR
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
305,130
76,281
137,996 16,000
167,134-
167,134-
55-
23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME
22-000-00-4157 M F T ALLOCATION
1,150,000
287,499
283,973
96,155
866.027-
866,027-
75-
22-000-00-4242 REIMBURSEMT ON PROJECTS
35,000
8,748
187,134-
58 -
35,000-
35,000-
100-
22-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
20,000
4,998
11,883
4,472
8,117-
8,117-
41-
22-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCO14E300
75
53
23
247-
247-
82-
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1,205,300
301,320
295,909
100,650
909,391-
909,391-
75 -
TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
-------------------------------------------
1,205,300
301,320
295,909
100,650
909,391-
909,391-
75 -
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT...BLOCK GRANT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
23-000-00-4155 CDBG GRANT
305,130
76,281
137,996 16,000
167,134-
167,134-
55-
23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME
20,000
4.998
91,362
20,000-
20.000-
100 -
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
325,130
81,279
137,996 16,000
187,134-
187,134-
58 -
TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
------------------------------------------
325,130
81,279
137,996 16,000
187,134-
187,134-
58 -
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE
24-000-00-4055 TAXES - CURRENT
330,325
82,581
330,325-
330,325-
100-
24-000-00-4056 TAXES - PRIOR
365,450
91,362
14,739
382
350,711-
350,711-
96-
24-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX
50.000
12,498
34,018
34.018
15.982-
15,982-
32
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
745,775
186,441
48,757
34,400
697,018-
697,018-
93-
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
_
0
24-000-00-4228 TRANS - GENERAL/CABLE TV
24-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
2.500
624
236
153
2.264-
2.264-
91-
70TAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
2,500
624
236
153
2,264-
2,264-
91 -
TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
----------------------------
748,275
187,065
48,993
34,553
699,282-
699,282-
93 -
BENEFIT TRUST N2
OTHER REVENUE
31-OOO-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE
TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #2
-------------------------------
BENEf IT TRUST #3
OTHER REVENUE
32-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE
TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #3
----------------------
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
20,000 4,998 4,902 1,534
20,000 4,998 4,902 1,534
20,000 4,998 4,902 1,534
LIBRARY FUND
53,170-
R
RALANCF
TAX REVENUE
BAL
15,098-
15,098-
39-000-00-4031
TAXES - LIBRARY SERVICES1,729,935
432,4B3
39-000-00-4037
TAXES - IMRF
220,400
55,098
39-000-00-4038
TAXES - NAINT & REPAIR
144,200
36,048
39-000-00-4039
TAXES -INSURANCE & AUDIT
29,120
7,278
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
2,123,655
530.,907
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
97-
39-ODO-00-4157
STATE GRANT
53,170
13,290
39-000-00-4164
PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX
25,330
6,330
39-000-00-4246
FINES AND FORFEITS
50,000
12,498
39-000-00-4248
INTEREST INCOME
60,000
15,000
39-000-00-4254
OTHER INCOME
511,500
127,875
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
700,000
174,993
TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 2,823,655 705,900
----------------`-------------------------
WATER & SEWER FUM@
TAX REVENUE
41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
41-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR
41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
41-000-00-4157 GRANT -SEWER REHAB
41-000-00-4201 WATER SALES
41-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES
41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES
41-000-00-4204 METER SALES
41-fM-00-4205 WATER & SEWER TAPS
44 15
44 15
44 15
PAGE 4
UNREC'D
53,170-
R
RALANCF
BALANCE
BAL
15,098-
15,098-
75-
15,098-
15,098-
75-
15,098-
15,098-
75-
44 44 0
44 44 0
44 44 0
1:729,935- 1,729,935- 100-
220,400- 220,400- 100-
144,200- 144,200- 100-
29,120- 29,120- 100-
2,123,655- 2,123,655- OO-
53,170-
53,170-
100-
25,330-
25,330-
100-
50,000-
50,000-
100-
60,000-
60,000-
100-
511,500-
511,500-
100-
700,000-
700,000-
100-
2,823,655- 2,823,655- 100-
641,450
160,362
641,450-
641,450-
100-
856,600
214,149
41,156
945
815,444-
815,444-
95-
15,000
3,75
6,299
5,465
8,701-
8,701-
58-
1,513,050
378,261
47,455
6,410
1,465,595-
1,465,595-
97-
0
3,685,000
921,249
955,586
338,681
2,729,414-
2,729,414-
74-
370,000
92,499
96,046
37,068
273,954-
273,954-
74-
60,000
15,000
10,632
3,943
49,368-
49,368-
82-
20,000
4,998
7,790
2,639
12,210-
12,210-
61-
50,000
12,498
44,803
13,203
5,197-
5,197-
TO-
PARKING SYSTEM -REVENUE FUND
FEE REVENUE
REVENUE
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
5
46-000-00-4113 RENTAL - DEPOT
2.880
720
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
1.920-
1,920-
67 -
TOTAL FEE REVENUE
2,880
ACCOUNTING PERIOD
03 ENDING
7/31/91
1,920-
1,920-
67 -
PARKING REVENUE
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR NO
UNREC'D
1,500
%
82,000
20,499
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
BALANCE
HAL
WATER & SEWER FUND
15,937
5,116
50,063-
50,063-
76-
46-000-00-4213 SPACE RENT WILLE ST.LOT
8,500
2,124
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1,230
6,470-
6,470-
76-
46 -ODD -OO -4214 PROSPECT AVE.
15,000
3,750
41-000-00-4206
PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER
30,000
7,500
5,938
1,085
24,062-
24,062-
80-
41-000-00-4244
FLOOD ENGINEERING REIMB
66,150
16,536
TOTAL PARKING REVENUE
181,500
66,150-
66,150-
100-
41-000-00-4245
REIMBURSEMENTS
20,000
4,998
384
46,092
19,616-
19,616-
98-
41-000-00-4246
JAWA INCOME
12,774-
64-
48-000-00-4262
SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT
3,000
750
0
41-000-00-4247
JAWA INTEREST
25,000
6,249
48-400-00-4263
SALE OF P.W. EQUIPMENT
25,000-
25,000-
100-
41-000-00-4248.
INTEREST INCOME
250,000
62,499
55,522
16,876
194,478-
194,478-
78-
41-000-00-4249
MISCELLANEOUS
22,000
5,499
48-000-00-4265
SALE OF ENGINEERNG EQPT
22,000-
22,000-
100-
41-000-00-4250
BANK INTEREST INCOME
8,000
1,998
930
659
7,070-
7,070-
88-
41-000-00-4280
SALE OF PROPERTY
20,000
4,998
20,000-
20,000-
100-
41-000-00-4295
DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION
0
41-ODO-00-4299
WATER CLEARING ACCOUNT
0
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
4,626,150
1,156,521
1,177,631
414,154
3,448,519-
3,448,519-
75 -
TOTAL WATER & SEWER
------------------------------------------
FUND
6,139,200
1,534,782
1,225,086
420,564
4,914,114-
4,914,114-
SO -
PARKING SYSTEM -REVENUE FUND
FEE REVENUE
REVENUE
46-000-00-4113 RENTAL - DEPOT
2.880
720
960
240
1.920-
1,920-
67 -
TOTAL FEE REVENUE
2,880
720
960
240
1,920-
1,920-
67 -
PARKING REVENUE
0
48-000-00-4178
PLANNING & ZONING CHGS
1,500
375
1,500
46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION UNIT N1
82,000
20,499
20,834
7,141
61,166-
61,166-
75-
46-000-00-4212 METER COLLECTION UNIT R2
66,000
16,500
15,937
5,116
50,063-
50,063-
76-
46-000-00-4213 SPACE RENT WILLE ST.LOT
8,500
2,124
2,030
1,230
6,470-
6,470-
76-
46 -ODD -OO -4214 PROSPECT AVE.
15,000
3,750
4,796
1,632
10,204-
10,204-
68-
46-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
10.000
2 494
2,672
622
7,328-
7,328-
73
TOTAL PARKING REVENUE
181,500
45,372
46,269
15,741
135,231-
135,231-
75 -
TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
------------------------------------------
184,380
46,092
47,229
15,981
137,151-
137,151-
74 -
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE
REVENUE
48-000-00-4176
INSPECTION SERVICES CHGS
12,300
3,075
12,300
12,300-
0
48-000-00-4177
HUMAN SERVICES CHARGES
1,600
399
1,600
1,600-
0
48-000-00-4178
PLANNING & ZONING CHGS
1,500
375
1,500
1,500-
0
48-000-00-4179
POLICE DEPT CHARGES
130,000
32,499
130,000
0
48-ODO-00-4180
FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES
135,000
33,750
135,000
0
48-000-00-4181
STREET DIVISION CHARGES
190,000
47,499
190,000
0
48-000-00-4182
WATER FUND CHARGES
102,500
25,623
102,500
102,500-
0
48-000-00-4183
PARKING FUND CHARGES
9,000
2,250
9,000
9,000-
0
48-000-00-4248
INVESTMENT INCOME
201ODO
4,998
7,226
3,091
12,774-
12,774-
64-
48-000-00-4262
SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT
3,000
750
3,000-
3,000-
100-
48-400-00-4263
SALE OF P.W. EQUIPMENT
10,000
2,499
10,000-
10,000-
100-
48-000-00-4264
SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT
30,000
7,500
1,200
28,800-
28,800-
96-
48-000-00-4265
SALE OF ENGINEERNG EQPT
0
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE
49-000-00-4175
REVENUE
GENERAL FUND CHG-GENERAL
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
101,200
PAGE
6
404.800-
SO -
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
930,000
232,500
186,000
93,000
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31f91
744,000-
SO -
49 -000-00-4177
WATER FUND CHG-GENERAL
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D CUR NO
UNREC'D
110,200-
%
SO -
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL ACTUAL
BALANCE
BALANCE
BAL
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
75,000-
80-
49-000-00-4179
PARKING FUND CHG-GENERAL
4,500
1,125
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
450
3,600-
3,600-
80-
49-000-00-4180
LIBRARY FUND CHG-MEDICAL
48-000-00-4289 GAINJLOSS SALE OF ASSETS
17,598
21,030
447,150-
70,400-
70,400-
0
TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
644,900
161,217
590,326 123,804-
54,574-
54,574-
8-
TOTAL VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
------------------------------------------
644,900
161,217
590,326 123,809-
54,574-
54,574-
8 -
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE
49-000-00-4175
REVENUE
GENERAL FUND CHG-GENERAL
506,000
126,498
101,200
50,600
404 800-
404.800-
SO -
49 -D00 -00-41f6
GENERAL FUND CHG-MEDICAL
930,000
232,500
186,000
93,000
744,000
744,000-
SO -
49 -000-00-4177
WATER FUND CHG-GENERAL
137,750
34,437
27,550
13,775
110,200-
110,200-
SO -
49 -000-00-4178
WATER FUND CHG-MEDICAL
93,750
23,436
18,750
9,375
75,000-
75,000-
80-
49-000-00-4179
PARKING FUND CHG-GENERAL
4,500
1,125
900
450
3,600-
3,600-
80-
49-000-00-4180
LIBRARY FUND CHG-MEDICAL
70,400
17,598
21,030
447,150-
70,400-
70,400-
100-
49-000-00-4241
EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS
95,OOD
23,748
30,905
7,839
64,095-
64,095-
67-
49-000-00-4242
RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS
145,000
36,249
34,415
11,182
110,585-
110,585-
76-
49-000-00-4243
LIBRARY CONTRIBUTIONS
32,000
7,998
29,445
8,163
2,555-
2,555-
8-
49-ODO-00-4244
FLEXCOMP CONTRIBUTIONS
9,DDD
2,250
1,709
568
7,291-
7,291-
81-
49-000-00-4245
REIMBURSEMENTS
25,000
6,249
7,968
96-
17,032-
17,032-
68-
49-000-00-4248
INVESTMENT INCOME
70,000
17,499
18,085
5,852
51,915-
51,915-
74-
49-000-00-4249
INTEREST - GTE
5,500
1,374
5,500-
5,500-
100-
49-000-00-4250
BANK INTEREST INCOME
1.100
273 313
146
787-
787-
72 -
TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
2,125,ODO
531,234
457,240
200,854
1,667,760-
1,667,760-
78 -
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
2,125,000
531,234
457,240
200,854
1,667,760-
1,667,760-
78 -
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE
51-000-00-4016
TAXES - CURRENT
182,250
45,561
182,250-
182,250-
100-
51-000-00-4017
TAXES - PRIOR
221,500
55,374
8,933
232
212,567-
212,567-
96-
51-000-00-4248
INTEREST INCOME
10,000
2,499
4,393
1,575
5,608-
5,607-
56-
51-ODO-00-4267
DEVELOPER DONATION
50,000
12,498
19,223
19,223
30,777-
30,777-
62-
51-b00-00-4268
HISTORICAL SOCIETY DONTN
30,000
7.500
14,052
15,948-
15,948-
53 -
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
493,750
123,432
46,601
21,030
447,150-
447,149-
91 -
TOTAL CAPITAL
------------------------------------------
IMPROVEMENT FUND
493,750
123,432
46,601
21,030
447,150-
447,149-
91 -
POLICE & FIRE _BUILDING CONST
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
53-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX-SURCHG 265,000 66,249 265,452 129,627 452 452 0
53-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 4,000,000 999,999 3,999,715 285- 285- 0
53-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 235 000 58,749 66,212 26,786 168,788- 168.788- 72-
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BUILDING CONST
-------------------------`--------
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
FEE REVENUE
55-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME
55-000-00-4245 OTHER INCOME
55-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
55-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL FEE REVENUE
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
-----------------------------------
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT_. CONST 1991
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
4,500,000 1,124,997 4,331,379 156,413
4,500,000 1,124,997 4,331,379 156,413
13,500 3,375 7,125 1,500
2,126 635
50 10
13,500 3,375 9,301 2,145
13,500 3,375 9,301 2,145
OTHER REVENUE
56-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 1,000,000 249,999 519,765
56-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 25 000 6,249 5,131 2,47
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 1,025,000 256,248 524,896 2,470
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 1,025,000 256,248 524,896 2,470
------------------------------------------
CORPORATE
_-----_---_ `--- --------`------
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 11973
TAX REVENUE
60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
60-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR
60-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX
60-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973
--------------------`--------------
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974
TAX REVENUE
65,500 16,374
88,700 22,173_ 3,579 93
5,400 1,350
10,000 2.4 2,115 586
169,600 42,396 5,694 679
169,600 42,396 5,694 679
61-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 92,200 23,049
61-000-00-4023 TAXES - PRIOR 140,750 35,187 5,678 147
61-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 8,000 1,998
61-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 17,000 4,248 3,377 1,056
TOTAL TAX REVENUE 257,950 64,482 9,055 1,203
TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974 257,950 64,482 9,055 1,203
UNREC'D
BALANCE
168,621-
168,621-
6,375-
2,126
50
4,199-
4.199-
480,235-
19.86 -
,199-
4,199-
480,235-19,869-
500,104-
500,104-
65,500-
85,121-
5,400-
7.885-
163,906-
163,906-
92,200-
135,072-
8,000-
13.623-
248,895-
248,895 -
PAGE 7
X
BALANCE BAL
168,621- 4-
168,621- 4-
6,375- 47-
0
2,126 0
50 0
4,199- 31-
4,199- 31-
480,235- 48-
14,869- 79-
500,104- 49-
500,104- 49-
65,500- 100-
85,121- 96-
5,400- 100-
7,885- 79-
163,906- 97-
163,906- 97-
92,200- 100-
135,072- 96-
8,000- 100-
13,623- 80-
248,895- 96-
248,895- 96-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I
TAX REVENUE
62-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 9,900 2,475
62-000-00-4026 TAXES - PRIOR 9,800 2,448 168 14
62-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 2.500 624 679 216
TOTAL TAX REVENUE 22,200 5,547 847 230
TOTAL SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B & I 22,200 5,547 847 230
SSA #2 BLACKHAWK_B_& I
TAX REVENUE
63-000-00-4028 TAXES - CURRENT 11,000 2,748
63-000-00-4029 TAXES - PRIOR 8,950 2,235 19 19
63-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 3.000 750 731 242
TOTAL TAX REVENUE 22,950 5,733 750 261
TOTAL SSA #2 BLACKHAWK B & I 22,950 5,733 750 261
---------------------------------
POLICE & FIRE .BUILDING B & I
TAX REVENUE
64-000-00-4012 HOME RULE SALES TAX 200,000 49,998
64-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST 18,904
64-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1.500 375 186 92
TOTAL TAX REVENUE 201,500 50,373 19,090 92
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE BUILDING B & I 201,500 50,373 19,090 92
------------------------------------------
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPNT B & 11991
OTHER REVENUE
65-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST
65-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1991
-----------------------------------
INSURANCE RESERVE 8 & I
TAX REVENUE
66-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
2,457
24 12
2,481 12
2,481 12
UNREC'D
BALANCE
9,900-
9,632-
1.821-
21,353-
21.353-
11,000-
8,931-
2.269-
22,200-
22,200-
200,000-
18,904
1.314-
182,410-
182,410-
2,457
24
2,481
2.481
PAGE 8
X
BALANCE BAL
9,900- 100-
9,632- 98-
1,821- 73-
21,353- 96-
21,353- 96-
11,000- 100-
8,931- 100-
2.269- 76-
22,200- 97-
22,200- 97-
200,000- 100-
18,904 0
1.314- 88-
182,410- 91-
182,410- 91-
2,457 0
24 0
2,481 0
2,481 0
0
FLOOD CONTROL B & I
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
67-000-00-4227 TRANS - FLOOD CONTROL
50,500
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
50,500-
67-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
13,617
67-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
28,749
134 66
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D CUR NO
UNREC'D
13,751 66
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL ACTUAL
BALANCE
INSURA#CE RESERVE B & I
36,749 -
68-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
5,000
1,248
TAX REVENUE
3,980 -
TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
5,000
1,248
66-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR
3,980 -
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D
120,000
29,997
66-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
1,000
249
983 178
17 -
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
1,000
249
983 178
17 -
TOTAL INSURANCE RESERVE B & I
1,000
249
983 178
17 -
FLOOD CONTROL B & I
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
67-000-00-4227 TRANS - FLOOD CONTROL
50,500
12,624
50,500-
67-000-00-4247 BOND PROCEEDS INTEREST
13,617
13,617
67-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
115,000
28,749
134 66
134
TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
50,500
12,624
13,751 66
36,749 -
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL 8 & I
------------------------------------------
50,500
12,624
13,751 66
36,749 -
DOWNTOWN. REDEVLPMT _B& 11987D
TAX REVENUE
68-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT
115,000
28,749
115,000-
68-000-00-4039 SALES TAX INCREMENT
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
115,000
28,749
115,000-
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
68-000-00-4224 TRANS - D/T CONST 1985
68-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
5,000
1,248
1,020 216
3,980 -
TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
5,000
1,248
1,020 216
3,980 -
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D
120,000
29,997
1,020 216
-
118,980------------------------------------------
P W FACILITY 8_&_I 19876
TAX REVENUE
69-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 162,550 40,635
69-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 209,000 52,248 8,430 219
69-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 25,000 6,249 5,500 1,656
TOTAL TAX REVENUE 396,550 99,132 13,930 1,875
TOTAL P W FACILITY 8 & 1 19878 396,550 99,132 13,930 1,875
------------------------------------------
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987C
TAX REVENUE
162,550-
200,570-
19,500-
382,620-
382,620 -
PAGE 9
X
BALANCE BAL
0
17- 2-
17- 2-
17- 2-
50,500- 100-
13,617 0
134 0
36,749- 73-
36,749- 73-
115,000- 100-
0
115,000- 100-
0
3.984- 80-
3,980- 80-
118,980- 99-
162,550- 100-
200,570- 96-
19,500- 78-
382,620- 96-
382,620- 96 -
POLICE PENSION_ FUND
TAX REVENUE
71-000-00-4049
TAXES - CURRENT
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
10
75.000-
100-
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
1,500
375
',,117
29
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
383-
26-
71-000-00-4243
POLICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D CUR NO
UNREC'D
186,643-
%
73-
BUDGET
ERTIMATF
ACTUAL ACTUAL
BALANCE
BALANCE
BAL
70-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT
119,500
29,874
71-000-00-4249
119,500-
119,500-
100-
70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
145
36
2
143-
143-
99 -
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
119,645
29,910
2
119,643-
119,643-
100 -
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987C
------------------------------------------
119,645
29,910
2
119,643-
119,643-
100 -
POLICE PENSION_ FUND
TAX REVENUE
71-000-00-4049
TAXES - CURRENT
75,000
18,750
25,000-
75,000-
75.000-
100-
71-000-00-4050
TAXES - PRIOR
1,500
375
',,117
29
383-
383-
26-
71-000-00-4243
POLICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS
255,000
63,750
68,357
19,630
186,643-
186,643-
73-
71-000-00-4248
INTEREST INCOME
1,400,000
349,998
374,266
124,224
1,025,734-
1,025,734-
73-
71-000-00-4249
OTHER
0
72-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME
5,000
1,248
197
0
71-000-00-4250
BANK INTEREST INCOME
5,000
1,248
112
72
4,889-
4,888-
98-
71-000-00-4255
MARKET GAINS - EQUITIES
72-000-00-4275 OVERFUNDING CREDIT
359,900
89,973
41,527
318,373-
0
71-000-00-4275
OVERFUNDING CREDIT
288,500
72,123
33,289
255,211-
255,211-
88-
71-000-00-4290
GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT
438,850
74,700
1,768,550-
1,768,550-
80 -
TOTAL FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
------------------------------------------
0
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
438,850
2,025,000
506,244
477,141
143,955
1,547,860-
1,547,859-
76 -
TOTAL POLICE
------------------------------------------
PENSION FUND
2,025,000
506,244
477,141
143,955
1,547,860-
1,547,859-
76 -
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
TAX REVENUE
72-000-00-4052 TAXES - CURRENT
25,000
6,249
25,000-
25,000-
100-
72-000-00-4053 TAXES -PRIOR
50D
123
500-
500-
100-
72-000-00-4243 FIREMEN'S CONTRIBUTIONS
242,000
60,498
64,774
18,571
177,226-
177,226-
73-
72-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
1,575,ODO
393,750
332,352
56,040
1,242,648-
1,242,648-
79-
72-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME
0
72-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME
5,000
1,248
197
89
4,803-
4,803-
96-
72-000-00-4255 MARKET GAINS - EQUITIES
0
72-000-00-4275 OVERFUNDING CREDIT
359,900
89,973
41,527
318,373-
318,373-
88-
72-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT0
?OTAL TAX REVENUE
2,207,400
551,841
438,850
74,700
1,768,550-
1,768,550-
80 -
TOTAL FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
------------------------------------------
2,207,400
551,841
438,850
74,700
1,768,550-
1,768,550-
80-
SSA #4 BUSSEgWILIE B & I
OTHER REVENUE
15
5
15
15
0
89-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL OTHER REVENUE
15
5
15
15
0
TOTAL SSA #4 BUSSE-WILLE B & I
------------------------------------------
15
5
15
15
0
SSA #6 GEORGEIALBERT B & I
TAX REVENUE
94-ODO-00_4019 TAXES -CURRENT
94-ODO-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR
94-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
TOTAL SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B & I
--------------------------------
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
15,300 3,825
16,900 4,224 135 20
1,500 375 289 81
33,700 8,424 424 101
33,700 8,424 424 101
35,896,885 14,255,834
11,474,031 2,037,721
UNREC'D
BALANCE
15,300-
16,765-
1.211-
33,276-
33,276-
21,641,056 -
PAGE 11
X
BALANCE BAL
15,300- 100-
16,765- 99-
1,211- 81-
33,276- 99-
33,276- 99-
88-
31,641,051-
12
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNIING
PERIOD OS ENDING
7(31/91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR NO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
X
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
RAi ANCF
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
GAL
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
20,450
5,109
5,298
1,787
15,153
15,152
74
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
44,200
11,046
30,485
5,807
13,715
13,715
31
TOTAL COMMODITIES
5,500
1,374
2,713
1,285
2,787
2,787
51
TOTAL MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
70,150
17,529
38,496
8,879
31,655
31,654
45
ADVISORY BOARDS AND CQMMISSIONS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,250
561
99
99
2,151
2,151
96
TOTAL COMMODITIES
750
186
750
750
100
TOTAL ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSI
3,000
747
99
99
2,901
2,901
97
TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
------------------------------------------
73,150
18,276
38,595
8,978
34,556
34,555
47
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
197,955
49,476
. 52,519
15,611
145,437
145,436
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
19,970
4,989
3,668
1,995
16,302
16,302
82
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1,900
474
173
30
1,727
2
1,725
91
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
500
123
500
500
100
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
220,325
55,062
56,360
17,636
163,966
2
163,963
74
LEGAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
142,500
35,622
24,352
19,796
11@ 148
118.148
83
TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES
142500
35,622
24,352
19,796
118,148
118,148
83
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT & TRAINING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
46,240
11,556
14,078
5,127
32,162
32,162
70
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
36,350
9,075
10,446
3,901
25,904
2
25,902
71
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1,500
372
1.500
1,500
100
TOTAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT & TRAIN
84,090
21,003
24,524
9,028
59,566
2
59,564
71
TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
------------------------------------------
446,915
111,687
105,236
46,460
341,680
4
341,675
76
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
113,875
28,458
26,544
8,235
87,331
87,331
77
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
29,270
7,308
8,873
18-
20,398
3
20,394
70
TOTAL COMMODITIES
13,000
3,249
1,402
1,229
11,598
2
11,596
89
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
16,200
4,047
700
700
15,500
151500
96
TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS
172,345
43,062
37,519
10,146
134,827
5
134,821
78
VILLAGE TELEPHONE SYSTEM
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
40,250
10,059
9,158
5,936
31,092
31,092
77
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1,500
375
1,500
1,500
10D
TOTAL VILLAGE TELEPHONE SYSTEM
41,750
10,434
9,158
5,936
32,592
32,592
78
TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
------------------------------------------
214,095
53,496
46,677
16,082
167,419
5
167,413
78
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPRRT
12
PAGE 13
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X
BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL
114,055
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
75
63,102
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
84
5,408
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING
7/31/91
2,500
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR MO
78
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
94
593
593
79
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
67,611
74
16,921
16,921
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
152,250
38,049
38,195
11,455
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
75,480
18,861
12,378
5,199
TOTAL COMMODITIES
6,250
1,560
842
181
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2.500
624
98
3,500
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
236,480
59,094
51,415
16.835
ACCOUNTING
21,598
79
7,181
7,181
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
87,285
21,819
23,918
6,871
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
3,900
975
249
73
TOTAL COMMODITIES
750
186
157
6
TOTAL ACCOUNTING
91,935
22,980
24,324
6,950
PURCHASING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
23,100
5,775
6,179
1,777
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
600
150
90
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1,900
474
TOTAL PURCHASING
25,600
6,399
6,269
1,777
RATA PROCESSING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
80,205
20,049
19,671
5,269
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
19,500
4,875
4,587
469
TOTAL COMMODITIES
6,000
1,500
124
124
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
3.500
873
TOTAL DATA PROCESSING
109,205
27,297
24,382
5,862
DUPLICATING SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
27;500
6,873
5,902
614
TOTAL COMMODITIES
7.500
1,875
319
58 -
TOTAL DUPLICATING SERVICES
35,000
8,748
6,221
556
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1-
1 -
TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE
1-
1 -
INSURANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
31,765
7,938
8,517
2,448
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
209,100
52 272
'41,820
20,910
TOTAL INSURANCE
240,865
60,210
50,337
23,358
CUSTOMER SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
116,410
29,097
33,376
9,193
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
37,000
9,246
4,058
1,106
TOTAL COMMODITIES
7,600
1,893
387
TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICES
161,010
40,236
37,821
10,299
CASH MANAGEMENT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
24,805
6,198
6.641
1,909
TOTAL CASH MANAGEMENT
24,805
6,198
6,641
1,909
NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
500
123
PAGE 13
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X
BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL
114,055
114,055
75
63,102
2 63,100
84
5,408
2 5,406
86
2,500
2,500
100
185,065
4 185,061
78
63,367
63,367
73
3,651
3,651
94
593
593
79
67,611
67,611
74
16,921
16,921
73
510
510
85
1.900
1,900
100
19,331
19,331
76
60,534
60,534
75
14,913
14,913
76
5,876
5,876
98
3,500
3.500
100
84,823
84,823
78
21,598
21,598
79
7,181
7,181
96
28,779
28,779
82
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
23,248 23,248 73
167 280 167,280 80
190,528 190,528 79
83,034 83,034 71
32,942 32,942 89
7.213 1 7,212 95
123,189 1 123,188 77
18,164 18,164 73
18,164 18,164 73
500 500 100
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
14
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCUUNIING
PERIOD 03 ENDING
7131M
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR NO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
X
BLIDCET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAi
AcniAL
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
BAL
TOTAL NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE
500
123
500
500
100
TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT
s -----------------------------------------
925,400
231,285
207,409
67,545
717,991
5
717,986
78
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
75,020
18,750
20,059
5,993
54,961
54,961
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
33,950
8,478
7,043
3,118
26,907
26,907
79
TOTAL COMMODITIES
5,000
1,248
1,155
364
3,845
2
3,843
77
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
113,970
28,476
28,257
9,480
85,713
2
85,711
75
NEWSLETTER
__VILLAGE
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
33,500
8,373
8,V16
3,377
24,524
24,524
73
TOTAL COMMODITIES
3,000
750
862
2.138
2,138
71
TOTAL VILLAGE NEWSLETTER
36,500
9,123
9,838
3,377
26,662
26,662
73
TOTAL VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
---------------------------------®__------
150,470
37,599
38,095
12,857
112,375
2
112,373
75
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,125,000
531.24
662,300
160.106
1,462,700
53
1 462,647
64
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
2,125,000
531,240
662,300
160,106
1,462,700
53
1,462,647
69
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT
------------------------------------------
2,125,000
531,240
662,300
160,106
1,462,700
53
1,462,647
69
INSPECTION SERVICES
INSPECTION SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
449,400
112,329
115,525
35,489
333,875
333,875
74
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
95,400
23,835
21,021
1,378
74,380
74,379
78
TOTAL COMMODITIES
9,000
2,238
1,129
431
7,871
1
7,870
87
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
12,500
3,123
12,500
12,500
100
TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES
566,300-
141,525
137,675
37,298
428,626
1
428,624
76
ENGINEERING SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
360,750
90,168
94,630
28,927
266,121
266,120
74
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
79,150
19,770
16,018
2,276-
63,133
70
63,062
80
TOTAL COMMODITIES
6,500
1,623
397
263-
6,103
6,103
94
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
5,000
1,248
86
14
4,914
4,914
98
TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
451,400
112,809
111,131
26,928
340,271
70
340,199
75
TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES
------------------------------------------
1,017,700
254,334
248,806
64,226
768,897
71
768,823
76
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
919,710
229,896
182,798
45,930
736,912
736,912
80
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
243,800
60,939
50,650
21,088
193,151
193,150
79
TOTAL COMMODITIES
10,500
2,625
1,001
461
9,499
9,499
90
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
6,000
1,497
6,000
6,000
100
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
1,180,010
294,957
234,449
67,479
945,562
945,561
80
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
15
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING
7/31%91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR NO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
%
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED BALANCE
SAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
2,707,375
676,830
729,520
206,233
1,977,855
1,977,855
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
319,700
74,920
119,202
26,250
200,498
200,498
63
TOTAL COMMODITIES
30.200
7.542
1,947
897
28,253
28.253
94
TOTAL PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEME3,057,275
764,292
850,664
233,380
2,206,606
2,206,606
72
CRIME FR£V. PUBLIC AND YOUTH SERV.
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
121,815
30,444
31,820
8,950
89,995
89,995
74
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
16,100
4,020
2,418
850
13,683
13,682
85
TOTAL COMMODITIES
3.750
933
200
128
3,550
3.550
95
TOTAL CRIME PREY., PUBLIC AND YOUT 141,665
35,397
34,438
9,928
107,228
107,227
76
INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PROGRAM
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
565,460
141,471
152,071
43,128
413,889
413,889
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
51,200
12,798
9,947
4,642
41,253
41,253
81
TOTAL COMMODITIES
2.500
621
328
120
2,173
2.172
87
TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE
P 619,660
154,890
162,346
47,890
457,315
457,314
74
CROSSING GUARDS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
48,U00
12,000
9,101
38,899
38,899
81
TOTAL COMMODITIES
250
60
41
209
209
84
TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS
48,250
12,060
4,142
39,108
39,108
81
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
54,950
13,731
13,872
4,412
41,078
41,078
75
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
198,650
49,653
151,948
1,970
46,702
5
46,647
24
TOTAL COMMODITIES
124,000
30,996
28,607
9,959
95,393
25
95,368
77
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
51.200
12.795
6.699
3.094
44.501
44.501
87
TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPER 428,800
107,175
201,126
19,440
227,674
30
227,644
53
TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT
------------------------------------------
5,475,660 1,368,771
1,492,170
378,117
3,983,493
30
3,983,460
73
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT,
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
719,495
179,856
124,273
24,269
595,223
595,222
83
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
178,905
44,715
32,133
15,333
146,772
1
146,771
82
TOTAL COMMODITIES
34,400
8,598
1,677
421
32,723
72
32,651
95
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
0
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
432,800
233,169
158,083
40,023
774,718
73
774,644
83
FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
2,910,055
727,494
779,659
235,578
2,130,396
-
2,130,396
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
265,490
66,366
53,857
24,433
211,633
211,633
80
TOTAL COMMODITIES
13,000
3,246
6,776
6,037
6,224
6,224
48
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
74.240
18,567
6,403
278
67,887
35
67.852
91
TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS
3,262,835
815,673
846,695
266,326
2,416,140
35
2,416,1D5
74
FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
20,000
4,998
20,000
20,000
100
TOTAL COMMODITIES
7,290
1,821
2,232
45
5,058
5,658
69
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2,200
549
2.200
2,200
100
TOTAL FIRE TRAINING ACADEMY
29,490
7,368
2,232
45
27,258
27,258
92
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
t6
BUDGET EXPENSE
REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD
03 ENDING
7/31/91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR NO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
%
wi_m_r_,F_T
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
BAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
FIRE PREVENTION
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
238,180
54,524
54,685
16,314
178,496
17$,495
75
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
37,805
4,444
7,698
4,250
30,107
30,107
4,037
80
73
TOTAL COMMODITIES
5,540
1,377
1,503
709
4,037
231
36
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
650
282,175
162
70,512
419
64,305
136
21,409
231
212,871
212,870
75
TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION
COMNUMICATIONS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
40,585
10,143
10,556
3,655
30,029
26
30,003
74
TOTAL CAPITAL E%PENDITURES
11,875
2,467
11,$75
41,904
26
11.875
41,878
100
80
TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS
52,460
13,110
10,556
3,655
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OFrERATIONS
66,035
16,506
17,373
4,946
48,662
48,662
74
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
158,000
39,448
138,067
1,929
19,933
19,933
13
TOTAL COMMODITIES
45,400
11,346
10,178
2,985
35,222
35,222
4,342
78
84
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPER
5.170
274,605
1,290
68,640
826
166,444
9,910
4,344
108,161
2
2
108,159
34
EMERGENCY PREP#REDNESS
3,000
750
808
231
2,142
2,192
73
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
5,905
1,470
191
84
5,714
5,714
97
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,605
645
154
62
2,446
2,446
44
TOTAL COMMODITIES
6.840
1.704
800
800
6,040
17
6.023
88
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
18,350
4,569
1,95$
1,177
16,392
17
16,375
89
TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 4,852,715
------------------------------------------
1,213,041 1,255,273
342,545
3,597,444
153
3,597,289
74
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
POLICE & FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES
328,925
82.230
104,640
54,820
219,285
214.285
b7
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL POLICE & FIRE DISPATCH SERVI
328,925
82,230
104,640
54,820
219,285
219,285
67
TOTAL CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
------------------------------------------
328,925
82,230
109,640
54,820
219,285
219,285
67
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
IK NATION REFERRAL, & COUNSELING
PERSONAL SERVICES
155,495
38,979
39,335
12,012
116,660
116,660
75
TOTAL
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
35,370
8,835
9,255
1,681
26,115
1
26,114
3,831
74
95
TOTAL COMMODITIES
4,050
1,068
219
199
3,831
959
459
60
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL INFORMATION, REFERRAL, & COU
1,600
197,015
394
49,221
641
49,450
641
14,533
147,565
1
147,564
75
RECREATION AND EDUCATION
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
15,540
3,874
4,203
1,209
11,337
11,337
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,640
669
1,568
280
1,122
12,459
1.122
12,459
42
68
TOTAL RECREATION AND EDUCATION
18,230
4,548
5,771
1,489
fR)M£ SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
53,440
13,482
14,703
4,241
39,237
34,237
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
18,150
4,536
3,087
1,020
15,063
15,063
83
VILLAGE Of
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
17
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING
7/31/91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR NO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
X
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
GAL
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
TOTAL HOMEBOUND SERVICES
72,090
18,018
17,790
5,261
54,300
54,300
75
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
41,040
10,254
6,529
1,890
34,511
34,511
84
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,800
447
203 54
1,597
1,597
89
TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
42,840
10,701
6,732
1,944
36,108
36,108
84
BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
2,805
699
701
234
2,104
2,104
75
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1,450
360
123
17
1,327
1,327
92
TOTAL BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM
4,255
1,059
824
251
3,431
3,431
81
SOCIAL AGENCIES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
16.500
4,125
16,500
16.500
100
TOTAL SOCIAL AGENCIES
16,500
4,125
16,500
16,500
100
TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
------------------------------------------
350,930
87,672
80,567
23,478
270,363
1
270,362
77
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
167,295
41,814
43,810
13,429
123,486
123,485
74
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
38,800
9,693
5,995
602
32,805
32,805
85
TOTAL COMMODITIES
3,250
807
165
50
3,085
2
3,083
95
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
200
48
200
200
100
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING
2D9,545
52,362
49,970
14,081
159,576
2
159,573
76
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
49,950
12,480
13,995
4,296
35,955
35,955
72
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
20,350
5,085
1,705
1,000
18,645
18,645
92
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
20 000
4,998
5,616
5,616
14,384
14,384
72
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
90,300
22,563
21,316
10,912
68,984
68,984
76
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
13,440
3,357
4,733
1,493
8,707
8,707
65
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
13,440
3,357
4,733
1,493
8,707
8,707
65
CDBG ADMINISTRATION
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
42,380
10,584
10,970
3,632
31,410
31,410
74
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
7,850
1,953
370
44
7,480
7,480
95
TOTAL COMMODITIES
600
147
600
600
100
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
300
75
300
300
100
TOTALS ADMINISTRATION
51,130
12,759
11,340
3,676
39,790
39,790
78
CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
39,000
9,747
2,667
1,333
36,333
133
36,200
93
TOTAL CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
39,000
9,747
2,667
1,333
36,333
133
36,200
93
C08G ACCESSIBILITY & NEIGHBORHOOD IMPRVM
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
60 000
15,000
6,159
53,841
449
53,392
89
TOTAL CDBG ACCESSIBILITY & NEIGHBO,
60,000
15,000
6,159
53,841
449
53,392
89
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
351,327
77
153,264
CDBG RESL4€NTIAL REHABILITATION
153,263
81
12,617
1
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
5,100
1,275
472
163
TOTAL CAPITAL. EXPENDITURES
120.000
30,000
16 828
16,661
TOTAL CDBG RESIDENTIAL REMABILITAT
125,100
31,275
17,300
16,824
CDBG COMH AL REHA82LiTATION
63,868
78
64,640
35
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
7,900
1,974
132
8,000
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4,000
999
301,978
SO
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
18,000
4,500
63
14,908
TOTAL CDBG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATI
29,900
7,473
.132
6
DBG MULTI -FAMILY REHBLLITATI
93
2,221
2,221
__C
TOTAI PERSONAL SERVICES
108,771
137
2"
65
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
10-000
2 499
53
51,572
TOTAL CDRG MULTI -FAMILY REHASILITA
10,ODO
2,499
24
CDBG DOWNTQWN IMPROYEMfNTS
80
1,362,755
11,315
1,351,44
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
1,491,583
11,615
1,479,967
85
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10,000
2,499
TOTAL CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS
10,00()
2,499
TOTAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
----------------`-------------------------
638,415
159,534
113,641
48,319
STREET DIVISION
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
457,345
114,318
106,018
31,481
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
190,050
47,505
36,787
18,885
TOTAL COMMODITIES
16,000
3,999
3,383
1,095
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
3,000
750 3,000
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
666,395
166,572
149,188
51,461
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS
'
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
206,315
51,576
40,810
13,013
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
82,250
20,556
18,382
5,040
TOTAL COMMODITIES
83,000
20,736
18,360
8,510
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
8.000
1,998
TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILOI
379,565
94,866
77,552
26,613
4INTfNAN9OF GROUNDS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
136,500
34,119
50,053
15,674
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22,500
5,622
7,592
3,072
TOTAL COMMODITIES
5,600
1,398
405
70
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2,700
672
479
451
TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
167,300
41,811
58,529
19,267
STREET MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
90,695
22,668
42,632
12,958
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
55,500
13,875
3,928
2,338
TOTAL COMMODITIES
36,600
9,144
7,408
3,572
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1,563,500
390.867
200.745
200.402
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
1,746,295
436,554
254,713
219,270
PAGE 18
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X
RAI_ANCF FNCUNRERED BALANCE SAL
4,628
103.172
107,800
7,768
4,000
18 000
29,768
24-
9
9.976
10,000
10,OW
524,775
4,628 91
103.172 86
107,800 86
7,768 98
4,000 100
18.000 100
29,768 100
24- 0
10.000 100
9,976 1D0
0
® 10.000 100
10,000 100
584 524,190 82
351,327
351,327
77
153,264
153,263
81
12,617
1
12,616
79
0
517,208
1
517,206
78
165,505
165,505
80
63,868
63,868
78
64,640
35
64,605
78
8,000
8,000
100
302,013
35
301,978
SO
86,447
86,447
63
14,908
131
14,777
66
5,195
6
5,189
93
2,221
2,221
82
108,771
137
108,634
65
48,064
48,063
53
51,572
300
51,272
92
29,192
29,192
80
1,362,755
11,315
1,351,44
86
1,491,583
11,615
1,479,967
85
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
STREET DIVISION
SNOW REMOVAL
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 92,570 23,142 7,077 1,652
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7,500 1,872
TOTAL COMMODITIES 85,000 21,249
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 30,500 7,623
TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL 215,570 53,886 7,077 1,652
LEAF REMOVAL.
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 67,485 16,866 3,088 1,730
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 660 -
TOTAL COMMODITIES 16,500 4,122
TOTAL LEAF REMOVAL 83,985 20,988 3,088 1,070
STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 42,305 10,572 9,389 2,817
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74,ODD 18,498 3,492 3,492
TOTAL COMMODITIES 14,000 3,498 2,469 2.440
TOTAL STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTE 130,305 32,568 15,350 8,749
FORESTRY
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 199,865 49,959 55,048 17,706
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 193,000 48,243 1,751 1,506
TOTAL COMMODITIES 91600 2,397 3,654 1,862
TOTAL FORESTRY 402,465 100,599 60,453 21,074
TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 51,315 12,825 14,327 3,640
TOTAL COMMODITIES 26,700 6,669 2,412 2,412
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3.000 750
TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 81,015 20,244 16,739 6,052
PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 34,815 8,700 5,998 1,601
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,350 1,335 300 215
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,500 873
TOTAL PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATIO 43,665 10,908 6,298 1,816
MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY$
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 11,555 2,886 2,646 1,075
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,550 3,882
TOTAL COMMODITIES 23,500 5,868 1,501 1,501
TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY 50,605 12,636 4,147 2,576
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 104,685 26,163 25,983 8,848
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195,000 48,747 190,473 115
TOTAL COMMODITIES 128,500 32,121 29,892 11,327
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,000 498
TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 430,185 107,529 246,348 20,290
POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 5,225 1,302 1,230 358
PAGE 19
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X
BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE HAL
85,493 85,493 92
7,500 7,500 100
85,000 85,000 100
30.500 128 30,372 100
208,493 128 208,365 97
64,397 64,397 95
0
16.500 16 16.484 100
80,897 16 80,881 96
32,916 32,916 78
70,508 665 69,843 94
11,531 19 11,512 82
114,955 684 114,271 88
144,817 144,817 72
191,250 950 190,299 99
5.946 5,946 62
342,013 950 341,062 85
36,989 36,988 72
24,288 24,288 91
3.000 3.000 100
64,277 64,276 79
28,817 28,817 83
O
5,050 5,050 94
3.500 3,500 100
37,367 37,367 86
8,909 8,909 77
15,550 108 15,442 99
21,999 21.999 94
46,458 108 46,350 92
78,703 78,702 75
4,527 4,527 2
98,608 19 98,589 77
2,000 11 1,989 99
183,838 30 183,807 43
3,995 3,995 76
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
"0
BUDGET EXPENSE
REPORT
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD
03 ENDING
7/31/91
1991_92
Y-T-D
Y-T-D
CUR NO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUI
%
BUDGET
EcTTNATF
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
DAL
STREET DIVISION
POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,000
1,497
5,692
2,320
309
308
5
TOTAL COMMODITIES
10,000
2,496
3,191
1,491
6,809
6,809
68
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1.500
375
1.500
15
1,485
99
TOTAL POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
22,725
5,670
10,113
4,169
12,613
15
12,597
55
TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIGHTING
3,125
780
595
239
2,530
2,530
81
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
248,000
61,998
20,988
20,856
227,012
227,012
92
TOTAL COMMODITIES
7,000
1,749
1,038
311
5,962
5,962
85
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
49.000
12.246
2,757
46,243
40
46,203
94
TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS & STREET LIG
307,125
76,773
25,378
21,406
281,747
40
281,707
92
TOTAL STREET DIVISION
------------------------------------------
4,727,200 1,181,604
934,973
405,465
3,792,233
13,759
3,778,468
80
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ADMINISTRATI(NI AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
438,895
109,704
95,205
28,444
343,690
343,690
78
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
559,300
139,800
111,967
51,768
447,333
11
447,322
80
TOTAL COMMODITIES
28,500
7,119
5,866
2,025
22,634
1
22,633
79
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
3,000
750
1,510
1,490
15
1,475
49
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
590,750
147,678
82,577
47=053
508 175
508,173
86
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
_
1,620.445
405.051
297,125
129,290
1,323,322
27
1,323,293
82
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
41,425
10,353
5,977
3,480
35,448
35,448
86
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6,500
1,623
1,339
787
5,161
5,161
79
TOTAL COMMODITIES
12,000
2,997
1,297
697
10,703
10,703
89
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,500
TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDI 61,425
375
15,348
8,613
4,964
1,500
52,812
1.500
52,812
100
86
MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
37,085
9,270
15,714
,
6,777
21,371
21,371
58
TOTAL COMMODITIES
5,400
1,350
1,081
710
4,319
4,319
80
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
7,5
1,875
7.500
7.500
100
TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
49,985
12,495
16,795
7,487
33,190
33,190
66
yATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE & REPAIR
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
148,755
37,185
35,742
9,789
113,013
113,013
76
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
94,000
23,496
11,501
10,806
82,499
82,499
88
TOTAL COMMODITIES
21,500
5.373
3.728
2,708
17,772
3
17,769
83
TOTAL WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE &
R 264,255
66,054
50,971
23,303
213,284
3
213,281
81
WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. & REPR..
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
150,220
37,551
38,237
13,016
111,983
111,983
75
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
40,100
10,020
3,698
1,756
36,402
172
36,230
90
TOTAL COMMODITIES
50,700
12,672
3,682
2,114
47,019
19
46,999
93
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
96.500
24,123
1.456-
97.956
97,956
102
TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT.
& 337,520
84,366
44,161
16,886
293,360
191
293,168
87
WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT.
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
98,825
24,705
31,509
5,800
67,316
67,316
68
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
21
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING
7/31/91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR MO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
%
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
SAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT.
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1,600
399
230
230
1,371
1,370
86
TOTAL COMMODITIES
36,700
9,174
4,837
1,521
31,863
52
31,811
87
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
0
TOTAL WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAIN
137,125
34,278
36,576
7,551
100,550
52
100,497
73
WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.& REPL.
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
84,035
21,006
25,202
8,448
58,834
58,833
70
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
37,500
9,372
1,475
1,475
36„025
337
35,688
95
TOTAL COMMODITIES
84,600
21,144
2,861
1,982
81,739
81,734
97
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
U
TOTAL WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.4 RE
206,135
51,522
29,538
11,905
176,598
337
176,260
86
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPERATIONS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
143,120
35,772
38,357
9,205
104,763
104,763
73
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
105,500
26,373
103,063
102,.385-
2,437
2,437
2
TOTAL COMMODITIES
100,700
25,170
20,720
10,512
79,980
10
79,970
79
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
8,400
2,100
3,595
3.595
4,805
4.805
57
TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPER
357,720
89,415
165,735
79,073-
191,985
10
191,975
54
SANITARY SEWER MAINT. & REPAIR
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
71,870
17,964
26,921
9,045
44,449
44,949
63
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
19,200
4,797
594
544
18,606
18,606
97
TOTAL COMMODITIES
11,000
2,748
1,303
626
4,697
9,697
88
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
13,000
3,246
2.126
10,874
21
10,853
83
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER MAINT. & REPA
115,070
28,755
30,944
10,265
84,126
21
84,105
73
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
115,000
28.744
5,473-
120,473
68
120,405
105
TOTAL WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
115,000
28,749
5,473-
120,473
68
120,405
105
SANITARY SEW R IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
0
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
100,000
24.999
100,000
101).000
101)
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
100,000
24,999
100,000
100,000
100
LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITION
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
2,750
684
2,750
2,750
1DO
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2.985,000
746,244
614.245
274,293
2,365,755
2.365,755
79
TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISIT2,987,750
746,928
619,245
274,293
2,368,505
2,'568,505
79
TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
------------------------------------------
6,352,430
1,587,960 1,294,230
406,871
5,058,205
709
5,057,491
80
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
16,525
4,125
4,553
1,318
11,972
11,472
72
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
43,850
10,962
15,464
5,857-
28,386
28,386
65
TOTAL COMMODITIES
0
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
60,375
15,087
20,017
4,539-
40,358
40,358
67
PARKING lOT MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
6,360
1,590
1,804
452
4,556
4,556
72
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
22
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD 03 ENDING
7/31/91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR NO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
%
11 IDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
SALANCE
€NC#3HRFRFD
BALANCE
DAL
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
10,800
2,694
1,235
374
9,565
9,565
89
TOTAL COMMODITIES
5,800
1,446
429
187
5,371
5,371
93
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
134,650
33 660
93.650
41 000
41,000
30
TOTAL PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE
157,610
39,390
97,118
1,013
60,492
60,492
38
TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
------------------------------------------
217,985
54,477
117,135
3,526-
100,850
100,850
46
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
$0 ID WASTE DISPOSAL
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
46,885
11,718
17,120
5,226
29,765
29,765
63
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
2,093,650
523,404
349,921
170,324
1,743,729
451
1,743,278
83
TOTAL COMMODITIES
72,500
18,123
30,513
14,577
41,987
568
41,419
57
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
40
40-
0
TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
2,213,035
553,245
397,554
190,127
1,815,481
1,059
1,814,422
82
TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
------------------------------------------
2,213,035
553,245
397,554
190,127
1,815,481
1,059
1,814,422
82
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
DOWNTOIIN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
838,000
209,496
26,553
3,043
811,447
155
811,292
97
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
49,000
12.249
49,000
49.000
100
TOTAL DOWNTOWN RCDCVELOPMENT CONST 887,000
221,745
26,553
3,043
860,447
155
860,292
97
FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
200,000
49,998
21,540
491
178,460
178,460
89
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
1,621,150
405,285
89,834
89,834
1,531,316
5,560
1,525,756
94
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
50,500
12.624
50,500
50,500
100
TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS
1,871,650
467,907
111,374
90,325
1,760,276
5,560
1,754,716
94
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL.SERVICES
4,800
11200
4,800
4,800
10D
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
30,000
7,500
7,028
3.000
22,973
110
22,862
76
TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
34,8DO
8,700
7,028
3,000
27,773
110
27,662
79
POLICEIFIRE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
4,400,000
1,099,998
197,388
135,764
4,202,612
4.103
4.8 x19509
95
TOTAL POLICEfFIRE BUILDING CONSTRU4,400,000
1,099,998
197,388
135,764
4,202,612
4,103
4,198,509
95
GENERAL EQUIP & IMPRVMNTS
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
100,000
24,999
363
363
99,637
133
_ 99,504
140
TOTAL GENERAL EQUIP & IMPRVMNTS
100,000
24,999
363
363
99,637
133
99,504
100
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
558,500
139,611
294,602
81190
263,898
1,906
261,992
47
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
Q
TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL
558,500
139,611
294,602
8,190
263,898
1,906
261,992
47
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
7,851,950
1,962,960
637,308
240,685
7,214,643
11,967
7,202,675
92
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE
23
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERF 03 ENDING
7/31/91
1991-92
Y -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR MO
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
X
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
BAL
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMUNITY GROUPS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22 700
5,673
8,549
5,001
14.151
222
13,929
61
TOTAL COMMUNITY GROUPS
22,700
5,673
8,549
5,001
14,151
222
13,929
61
4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS ETC.
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
13,100
3,270
13,901
13,901
801-
801-
6 -
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
17,000
4,245
11,442
640
5,558
51558
33
TOTAL COMMODITIES
11.500
2.868
1,681
1,601
9,819
9,819
85
TOTAL 4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS,
41,600
10,383
27,024
16,142
14,576
14,576
35
HDLIDAY DECORATIONS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
3,180
795
3,180
3,180
100
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
11,000
2,748
11,000
11,000
100
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1,000
249
1.000
1,000
100
TOTAL HOLIDAY DECORATIONS
15,180
3,792
15,180
15,180
100
TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
------------------------------------------
79,480
19,848
35,573
21,143
43,907
222
43,685
55
LIBRARY SERVICES
LIBRARY OPERATIONS
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
2,823,655
705,906
2 823 655
2823,655
100
TOTAL LIBRARY OPERATIONS
2,823,655
705,906
2,823,655
2,823,655
100
TOTAL LIBRARY SERVICES
------------------------------------------
2,823,655
705,906
2,823,655
2,823,655
100
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
1,414,175
353,517
320,667
156,627
1,093,510
1 093 508
77
TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
1,414,175
353,517
320,667
156,627
1,093,510
1,093,508
77
SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONQS
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
84,990
21,240
20.494
4,725
64,496
64,496
76
TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS
84,990
21,240
20,494
4,725
64,496
64,496
76
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
------------------------------------------
1,499,165
374,757
341,161
161,352
1,158,006
1,158,004
77
PENSION FUNDS
EMPLOYEE PENSIONS
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
36,600
9,147
9,150
3.050
27.450
27,450
75
TOTAL EMPLOYEE PENSIONS
36,600
9,147
9,150
3,050
27,450
27,450
75
POIItE PENSIONS
-
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
543,000
135,747
123,880
42,349
419,120
419,120
77
TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS
543,000
135,747
123,880
42,349
419,120
419,120
77
FIREMENS PENSIONS
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
578,000
144,495
128,240
43,756
449,760
449,760
78
TOTAL FIREMENS PENSIONS
578,000
144,495
128,240
43,756
449,760
449,760
78
TOTAL PENSION FUNDS
-------------------
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/41
1991-02 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO
suo—cT ESTIMATE AC
1,757,600 289,384 261,270 89,155
------------------
PAGE 24
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X
BALANCE ENCUMBERED 0AIANCE RAL
896,330 846,330 77
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/91
1991-92 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
TOTAL BUDGET EXPENSE 43,521,875 8,417,613
10,879,311 2,734,805
25
Village of Mbunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
X
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 15, 1991
SUBJECT: SIZZLER RESTAURANT LIQUOR LICENSE
We have been notified that the Sizzler Restaurant, 110 East Rand Road, has been
permanently closed and they have requested that their Liquor License be terminated.
The attached Ordinance provides for the reduction of one (1) Class W Liquor License.
DAVID C. JEPSON
DCJ/rcw
attachment
Sizzler Restaurants International, Inc., 12655 West Jefferson Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90066 (213) 827-2300
,Ofta
tozzler
SIR& Seafood - Salad
August 5, 1991
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
ATTN: Gerald L. Farley, Local Liquor Control Commissioner
RE: Class W, Liquor License 11575
Sizzler 1 366
110 E. Rand Road
Dear Mr. Farley:
This is to provide notification that the above referenced Sizzler
Restaurant is no longer open for business. In renewing the
license in March we indicated that we were closed for remodeling;
in April, it was permanently closed.
We are returning the Liquor License. We understand that it is
not transferable, but is it possible to obtain some reimbursement
of the renewal fee?
If you need any additional information, please feel free to
,contact me or Mark Midwin, District Manager, at 708-932-1900.
Sincerely,
]Bernice Whitcomb
License Division
Enclosure
(11c: Mark Midwin
nF-1)(Inla
76T*jr •�
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Subsection A of Section 0, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
decreasing the number of Class "W" liquor licenses by one (1) (Sizzler #366, 110 East
Rand Road) so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall
be and read as follows:
ion 13.107. N ber of Licens
Two (2)
Class A Licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Ten (10)
Class C Licenses
One (1)
Class D license
Two (2)
Class E Licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H License
Two (2)
Class M License
Two (2)
Class P Licenses
Nineteen (19)
Class R Licenses
Eight (8)
Class S licenses
One (1)
Class T License
Seven (7)
Class W Licenses
SECDQN TWO; That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Village President
CWH-fts
Village Clerk
1991.
Class
Establishment
Number
A
Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
2
B
Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano Liquors;
Dominick's (83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors;
Jay Liquors; Mt. Prospect Liquors;
Osco, Drugs; Phar-Mor; Walgreens (83 and Golf);
Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
1
M
Holiday Inn
1
P
Shimada Shoten;
1
Authorized; not issued
1
R
Artemis; Boo 111; DJB Brunetti; Dragon City;
Edwardo's; Fellini; Giordano's (Rand Road);
Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan;
Izakaya Sankyu; Little America; Magic Dragon;
Nina Restaurant; Pepe's; Sakura; Shin Jung;
Sunrise; Torishin; Yasuke
19
S
El Sombrero; Evans; Jake's Pizza; Jameson's
Charhouse; Kampai; Old Orchard Country Club
Restaurant; Sam's Place; Wild Stallions Cafe
8
T
Thunderbird Lanes
1
W
Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut (Algonquin Rd);
Rosati's Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's
7
58
VILIAGE OF MOUNT PRO&-rECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: June 28, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-30-V-91, Donald and Gail Forlani
4101 .'5. Afeiee Tead
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for variation filed by Donald and Gail Forlani. The applicant is requesting
a variation to Section 14.1102.11 to allow a sideyard setback of 28" (2.33') to accommodate
an existing patio used as a basketball court.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of June 27, 1991.
At the meeting, Donald and Gail Forlani presented testimony in support of their request.
They explained that they installed the 20' x 20' concrete pad themselves and didn't realize
a permit was required. They chose the location because it was on of the most level areas
of their yard. In addition, it was close to the house and screened from the neighbor by a
5' solid wood fence.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the concrete pad is only 2.33' from the side lot line
and that 6.5' is required on this lot. To comply with Code, 4.17' of pavement would have
to be removed.
The Zoning Board of appeals generally discussed the request noting the irregular
topography of the lot and that the basketball court is screened from the affected neighbor.
'They also noted that locating a basketball hoop in the front yard next to the driveway could
be dangerous as their road is quite busy.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variance to Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 20' x 20' patio/basketball court to remain as
installed 2.33' from the side lot line.
JF:cl
0
MULLr
t !t j�. � ` � Wt T !+r KAIt EN•8 •NL8UDD3 VI530N, Minq a NcaNr-lrlun a[ t U , }ll of
} wt l fUxceyt Ina Hoorn 988.31 (oct
ta t L. tnu ovn,.,•at Ui vl vo,,, Leina
�� tj9at lwraa[}Not tSaitiSnal O, Tovr,ehi (ql—+Y1tha• ttnAt IJ! e,{ thu ;.uue >r�e
-- A + � ttauya ii, Lvac uI tnr•!'1 rU<t
�t 1Dctwt n .la}.a, to CaaK cgaatt, lu:+S ARE REVIErrev UNUij THE PLAT
- SUBMITTED. AS OWNERIAGENE Of THE
' PEAT SUBMITTED k A TRUE COPY OF
7 EXISTING STRUCTURES ANU
J -' Zv 0010VIEMENTS.
A �r� r E
1- A wt c,� r✓T' 11
'_. ,F` � "1 t ��: �¢[ _ /str.,€ � � t. rrrs*�n� � r•.da. �T.. r,.,- ! o ..
4A kl�4?4
X13
-41
t,
952` �
�-/ n. T, ✓dr<tir _€'� E rw rrMN��L - a jd, �' `- >.x,
S ` LOT I3 L0714 2o7'fr 1
..-`HAPiA^J -B AUNS fi1RF_ST i✓l..lG - AJI?ti'f G/`J TQ f'1 Ct i; r�jT f" r ,�, �C!'_ --
J�R v,v� ' _ , t •kh't.<4 d -,j"' R.T..t fl<I!<!
�IMr
00
'�"tl1111er�1t�� wrEn,'
...
a"
h „
Y •
"%imminW
P
All.
of
off
ry
w
,mr -
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 30-V-91
Hearing Date: June 27, 1991
PETITIONER:
Donald and Gail Forlani
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
407 S. Meier Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
June 11, 1991
REQUEST:
Section 14.1102.B to allow a
sideyard setback of 28" (2.33')
to accommodate an existing patio
used as a basketball court.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102-B to
allow a sideyard setback of 28" (2.33') to accommodate an
existing patio used as a basketball court.
The petitioners, Donald and Gail Forlani of 407 S. Meier Rd.,
presented their case stating that they installed a 20' x 20'
patio in their rear yard that's about 2.5' from the side lot
line. Mr. Forlani stated that they use the patio as a
basketball court and there is a 5' wood fence along the side
lot line. Mr. Forlani stated that he did not have a permit
when he put the patio in because he thought if the homeowner
did the work a permit was not needed.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the patio is only 28" from the lot line and for
this particular lot the sideyard requirement is 6.5'. Miss
Farnham stated that the patio was located on a level area 46'f
close to the house. The patio is screened from the most
affected neighbor by the fence. To comply with Code the
petitioner would have to remove 4.5' of the patio. Miss
Farnham stated that staff had no objections.
Chairman Basnik asked the petitioner to present a hardship
for the variation.
C�
ZBA-30-91
June 27, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Mr. Forlani stated that he didn't want a basketball net next
to his driveway because the driveway slopes and Meier Road is
quite busy. It would also be expensive to remove.
The Board then discussed the petitioners request. Chairman
Basnik stated that no neighbors have any objections. Mr.
Lannon stated that it is in the rear yard and screened by the
fence. Mr. Brettrager stated that it is on level ground.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
pet;it!ioners request as proposed on exhibit I for a variation
to Section 14.1102.B to allow a sideyard setback of 28"
(2.33') to accommodate an existing patio used as a basketball
court.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JUNE 17, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-30-V-91
APPLICANT: DONALD AND GAIL FORLANI
ADDRESS: 407 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
oil, ME, I 11 =7
R X F ---4, "1 R x
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 18,883.8 sq. ft. (651 x 290.5')
% COVERAGE: 21.7%
F -A -R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicants are requesting a variation to Section 14.1102.13 to allow a sideyard setback
of 28" (2.33') to accommodate an existing basketball court.
Summary of application: The applicant installed a 20' x 20' concrete pad for a basketball
court 2.33 ft. (28") from their side lot line. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 6.5 ft. sideyard
setback. The pa,d was installed without a permit and the applicant is seeking a variation to
allow the pad to remain in the existing location.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is very deep with
irregular, slightly rolling topography. The court was located in an area that was relatively
flat, therefore, requiring a minimum amount Of regrading. They also wanted the court to
be located close to the house but not in the middle of their yard.
The basketball court is screened from the affected neighbor by a solid wood fence. The
basketball goal is located so that any poorly thrown shots would remain in the Forlani's
yard.
Staff notes that this is a very large lot and lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
In addition, there are no visible signs (i.e.) erosion or mud patches that the pavement has
created any drainage problems in the sideyard.
To bring the pad into compliance would require removing 4.17 ft. of pavement. The
applicant should address the feasibility of this action.
OTHER VILLAGE STAELCOAANI MEM
No major objections or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
$UMMAMIRECOMLIENDATI
O
Staff has no major objections to this request noting that the court is screened from the
affected neighbor. In addition, lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
While no particular hardship exists, the current location of the basketball court does not
appear to be injurious to the affected neighbor.
DMC:hg
17
VWL/
8/12/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 407 t9O!JTH ME
IER ROALD
WHEREAS, Donald and Gail Forlani (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) have filed an application for a variation from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 407 S. Meier Road (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 7 in Karen's Resubdivision, being a Resubdivision of
the West 1/2 of Lot I (except the South 988-31 feet
thereof) in the owner's Division, being a Subdivision of
the South East 1/4 (except the West 1/2 of the South West
1/4 thereof) of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11,
East of the 3rd Principal Meridian, in Cook County,
Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.B. to
allow a 2.331 side yard, rather than the required 6.51, in order
to accomodate an existing patio used as a basketball court.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 30-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
June, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Hergld on the 11th of June, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 30-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102.B. to permit a side yard setback of two feet
four inches (2.331) for an existing patio used as a basketball
court.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
ZBA 30-V-91
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
aEgjjgB fjVF -and effect
, This Ordinance shall be in full force
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
'1991.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: July 31, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-37-V-91, 205 South Audrey Lane
As you will see in the attached recommendation letter, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted
to deny a front yard variation at 205 South Audrey Lane. A side yard variation was
approved.
This memo is being written to advise the Village Board that the petitioner has revised the
site plan to substantially reduce the front yard variation. This revision would meet the goals
expressed by the Zoning Board and staff at the public hearing.
The revised site plan is attached, and depicts the garage addition maintaining the same front
setback as the house. However, because the frontage of the lot curves along Audrey Lane,
maintaining the same setback results in a 3' encroachment into the 30' required yard.
Staff would recommend approval of the revised plan, as this minimizes the variation, and
still meets the needs of the petitioner in providing an additional garage space.
DMC:cl
05Kl
UQ ° o
V7f - !
NEI�t 3'o WIVE&, --'
NE 16 ED
H
a__
�1TQ@_...a� �t � ( ' �T► pN I O, T�t.li�Sca I
N
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, irector of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-37-V-91, Frank DiVita
LOCATION: 205 South Audrey Lane
DATE: July 22, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Frank DiVita. The applicant is requesting the following
variations to accommodate an addition to an existing one -car garage at 205 South Audrey
Lane:
1) Section 14.1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30' as required by
code.
2) Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" 'side yard setback rather than 9.25' as required by
code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, Mr. DiVita explained that he wanted to create a two -car garage by adding to
his one -car garage. He stated that the angle of his lot line limits how much width could be
added to the side to avoid significantly impacting his neighbor. Adding to the front provides
additional length to the garage.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the applicants's lot is wedge-shaped with a curved
frontage which contributes to the need for the requested variations. She noted that it might
be possible to modify the proposed building plan to minimize the front yard encroachment
by adding extra length toward the back.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Some concerns were expressed that
the house is currently for sale and whether the proposed addition was for the applicant's
future use. The Zoning Board also expressed concerns about the degree of front yard
encroachment proposed. The Zoning Board expressed support for the alternative suggested
by staff to add to the back rather than to the front of the existing garage.
Accordingly, by a 0-7 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of a variation
to Section 14.1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback. They indicated that any addition
. should be flush with the front of the existing house. Also, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board
of Appeals recommends approval of a variation to Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" side yard
setback to accommodate an addition to the existing garage at 205 South Audrey Lane.
JF:cl
F11
p
I
I
Owl"
V.. SAeTrI°hl+is
vt ------------
ho. to. A S=Ivwx IL M SO=P 1T 6 Lc1CC1� SS
41 :,(x MA. Aaw 13� %A= or M tim POV'Z"
'uuv Er MMU 11).
IAA Om cowl.
144k
AAA*-,,
WMILI&SMAS AMD
&CIL
-SiATt'ar
COUNn 0,
m
ILq,Ober
Aar'
MAY is wim
t44u,
bm wA *0 S. d YWE � SM Mt Its MM
WMILI&SMAS AMD
&CIL
-SiATt'ar
COUNn 0,
m
luo
pmt_Av
j f
a
.°SYY
b _k e
PI
.rr
MIN['TES OF THE RFG(_1,AR MEETI"�G OF THE
W)UNT 1"ROSPE"'T BOARD OF APPEALS
ZRA CASE \'O 37-%'-91 Hearing Datc->: July 18, 1991
P El T IT,[ 0 \ FR Frank DiVita
S U BJ F C T PROPERTY : 205 South Audrey Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: July 2, 1991
REQUEST: Variations from Section 14.1102
to allow a 23'-6" front yard
setback rather than 30' as
required by Code. Section
14.1102 to allow a 6'-9"
sideyard setback rather than
9.25' as required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIE9:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14-1102 to
allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30' as required
by Code; Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" sideyard setback
rather than 9.25' as required by Code.
The petitioner, Mr. Frank DiVita of 205 S. Audrey Ln.,
presented his case stating that he would like to build an
addition onto an existing one -car garage. Mr. DiVita stated
that he is on a pie shaped and it is difficult to build any
thing without a variation of his front and side yards.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the applicant is on a wedged shape lot with a
curved front yard. Because the side lot line is angled it
would not be possible to construct another garage bay without
a sideyard encroachment. Miss Farnham stated staff suggested
that the applicant consider adding toward the back rather
than the front to achieve the desired garage length. This
would reduce the variation request for the front yard
setback. She noted that the front lot line is curved and even
if the addition were flush with the existing house, some
7
ZBA-37-V-91
July is, 1991.
Page 2 of 2
enproachment jnto the front yard would result.
Mr. Lannon questioned why the applicant need a tuO-csr
garage
Mr. DIVIta stated that he owns three cars.
�Ir. Lannon asked if this had anytbing to do vith his house
being up for sale to improve the property value
Mr. DiVita stated that he canted the too -car garage before he
put hK house up for sale.
The Board then generally discussed the case.
Mr. Lannon stated he would not voth in favor of a 6.5'
reduction in the required front yard. He also stated concerns
about the propose construction project being for speculative
purposes.
Chairman Pasnik then entertained a motIOT) to 9"T''t the
petitioners request for a 23'-6" front yard setback rather
than 30, as required by Code as shown on petitioners exhibit
51,
Mr. Lannon movecl. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: None
NAYS: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, passidy,
6rettrager,,Skowron, Basqi,k
Motioned denied by a vote of 0-7.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a 61-9" sideyard setback rather than
9.251 as required by Code.
Mr. 2rettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7 -0 -
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
IV
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECt—
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN M
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
JULY 11, 1991
CASE NO.:
ZBA-37-V-91
APPLICANT:
FRANK DI VITA
ADDRESS:
205 SOUTH AUDREY LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F -A -R.:
R-1 Single Family Residential
10,839 sq. ft
35.4%; 23% front yard proposed
0.23
9
Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 2
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
&E—ME-51
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of an
addition to the existing one -car garage:
1. Section 14.1102 to allow a 23'.6" front yard setback rather than 30 ft. as required by
Code.
2. Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" sideyard setback rather than 9.25 ft. as required by
Code.
VVY - M Offlut9 14 11 - U., - W
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to an existing
one -car garage. Four feel will be added to the front and 10.5 feet to the side to create a
two -car garage. The proposed addition will encroach 6.5 ft. into the required 30 ft. front
yard and 2.25 ft. into the required 9 ft. sideyard.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is wedge-shaped
with a curved frontage, The lot frontage is 90.5 ft. which requires a 9 ft. sideyard. Staff
notes that the lot is 82 ft. wide at the building line which would require an 8.2 ft. sideyard.
The existing house was built parallel to the north lot line. Consequently, the angle of the
South lot line results in varied setbacks. The addition is proposed on the South side of the
existing garage with setbacks ranging from 11 ft.. to 6-9" which accommodates the 2 ft. eave
overhang.
The garage addition will also encroach into the required 30 ft. front setback. Because the
lot frontage is curved, the encroachment varies from 3.42 ft. to 6.5 ft. with the front yard
reduced to 11'-6" at the closest point. Staff notes that the existing garage encroaches
V -10V into the front yard because of the curved frontage. The addition is parallel to the
front of the house, however, the curved frontage results in an increased encroachment.
Other homes in the block appear to have maintained the required 30 ft, front setback. The
proposed encroachment would be unique to the area and could set a precedent. Staff notes
that a mix of attached, one -car and detached two -car garages exist on the block.
GE 14 -ft # MUM
! nu
UNION WAAM
g
existing arage COUIU TCIRUIR WO VLIMUUJ CWfYffff
more to the back rather than extending forward.
Another alternative would be to construct a detached garage in the rear yard. The lot has
�sideyards wider than 10 ft, which would allow installation of a driveway. A detached garage
could be located in the rear yard without variations. However, because of the depth of the
property, lot coverage would be increased substantially.
The applicant should address the feasibility of these alternatives.
116
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
The applicant is also proposing a 1,106 sq. ft. room addition and 253 sq. ft. deck. These
improvements meet all Zoning Code requirements.
01HER VILLAGE STAEE COMMENTS
No major concerns or objections were stated by other Village staff. Engineering notes that
downspouts should be directed toward the front or back.
SUMMARY/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has some concerns about the front yard encroachment setting a precedent. Staff notes
that the curved lot frontage contributes to the encroachment. Reconfiguring the garage as
suggested, will meet the needs of the petitioner, and eliminate the front yard variation.
DMC:hg
VWL/
8/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 205 SOUTH AUDREY LANE
WHEREAS, Frank DiVita (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
205 South Audrey Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot No. 41 in Hatlen Heights Unit No. Two, a Subdivision
in the South Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 10,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner requested variations from Section 14.1102 to
allow a 231611 front yard setback rather than 301 and to allow a
6'911 side yard setback rather than 9.251 as required by code; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 37-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 18th day of
July, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Proggect Herald on the 2nd day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals approved the side yard
variation to allow a 61911 setback and recommended denial of the
variation from Section 14.1102 to allow a 231611 front yard setback;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner, being denied a front yard setback of 231611 on
the the 18th day of July, has revised the request and site plan,
requesting a variation from Section 14.1102 to permit a 271 front
yard setback rather than the 301 setback as required by code, and
approval of a 61911 side yard setback having been approved by the
Zoning Board of Appeals on the 18th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 37-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation, as depicted on the revised site plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE• The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
5Er.TIQN T. The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102 to permit a side yard setback of 61911 and a
front yard setback of 271; and
ZBA 37-V-91
Page 2 of 2
Except for the variation granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the subject Property.
CTI 2N--XD1DLL In accordance with the provisions of Section
:L4.604.B of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
,5ECTI2Nf_LyF,1, This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
'1991.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS'PIECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John F. Dixon, Village Manager
�Director
FROM:
David M. Clements, of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT:
ZBA-39-V-91, George Steil
LOCATION:
1050 South Linneman Road
DATE:
July 22, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by George Steil. The applicant is requesting the following
variations to accommodate paving of an existing circular driveway at 1050 South Linneman
Road:
1) Section 14.3016 to allow a circular driveway.
2) Section 14.1102.A to allow 48% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as allowed
by code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, George Steil explained that the circular drive provided additional parking space
and eliminated the need to back onto Linneman Road. He also stated that the existing
gravel circular driveway was installed about ten years ago when the house was built.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that additional parking space could be provided by widening
the existing driveway which is narrower than code allows. She also noted that paving the
existing gravel driveway would improve it's appearance.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that traffic on Linneman Road
gets quite busy during rush hours and the circular driveway had merit for safety purposes.
Accordingly, by a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
variations requested to accommodate a circular driveway at 1050 South Linneman Road.
JF:cl
172-17
i�i
LLl Ja
7�z
1 �, £ r r
i
i�t t } � t 'T
� c t
t
I
z I`
LI
t� o
te
t
`9
Ordered by
u{
%rrdar
Haag Scale i inch = �- leaf
Dale—�11!th I979
rnu/ARF Al i POINTS BEEOnE BUILDING BY SAME AND AT ONCE nEPORT ANY
Ie d
ri-21 $
e �d
STATE OF ILLMOtS ss
COUNTY OF COOK
t, JAMES M. ELL MA N. do hereby certify that t have surveyed
the above described property and that the plat hereon drawn is
a co. rect representation of said survey
Ell
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
M017 NT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
I
ZBA CASE NO. 39-V-91 Hearing Date: July 18, 1991
PETITIONER: George Steil
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1050 South Linneman Road
PUBLICATION DATE: July 18, 1991,
REQUEST: Variations from Section 14.3016
to allow a circular driveway.
Section 14.1102.A to allow 48%
front yard lot coverage rather
than 35% as allowed by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14,3016 to
allow a circular driveway and Section 14,1102.A to allow 48%
front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as allowed by Code.
The petitioner, George Steil of 1050 South Linneman Road,
presented his case stating that he would like to pave
an existing gravel circular driveway. Mr. Steil stated that
fie has a 30' deep front yard.
Mr. Lannon asked the petitioner wh;- he needs a circular
driveway.
Mr. Steil. stated that he has 6 children who have cars, and
lives on Linneman Road which during rush hour can be very
busy. Mr. Steil also stated that he lives on the curve on
Linneman Road and it's difficult to see cars coming around
the curve.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that there is an existing gravel circular driveway
which the applicant wants to pave. Miss Farnham stated that
the existing driveway leading back to the garage is narrower
than Code allows so
parking pad. This wo
without needing vari
circular driveway is
improve its looks.
The Board then gene
Mr. Lannon stated Q
north property line
Chairman Basnik they
petitioners request
front yard lot covei
Mr. Cassidy moved.
UPON ROLL CALL: A
Motion carried by a
This case must stil
ZBA-39-V-91
July is, 1991
Page 2 of 2
Ip to 9' could be added to create a
Ad provide additinal parking spaces
stioris . She also noted that the grave]
already there, and paving it would
ally discussed the petitioners request.
at shrubbery should be planted along the
to soften 'the impact on the neighbor,
entertained a motion to grant the
for a circular driveway and to alloy 48%
age.
r. Pratt seconded.
Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
B,rettrager, Skowron, Basnik
None
vote of 7-0.
be heard before the village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
n
Vr—LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPER,-1'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 751 x 1721(12,912 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 44.7%; 48% front yard proposed
F.A.R. : N/A .
-5
Gil Basnjlc, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate a circular driveway:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 48% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as allowed
by Code.
PIANNING &ND ZONING COMMENTS kND CONCERNS
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to pave an existing gravel circular
driveway. Circular driveways are only permitted by variation. In addition, a variance to
allow 48% front yard lot coverage is required to accommodate the proposed additional
pavement.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The lot is located at the point where
Linneman Road begins to curve. The applicant states that visibility is restricted and the
circular drive would eliminate the need to back onto Linneman Road. The circular drive
is also requested to provide space to park vehicles without blocking the existing driveway
which occupies most of the 12 ft. sideyard between the house and the south lot 'line.
Staff notes that there is an existing gravel circular driveway on this property. Paving it
would likely improve it's existing appearance. However, additional parking area could be
provided without variations.
A driveway width of 21 ft. is permitted for two -car garages. Most of the driveway is only
12 ft. wide. An additional 9 ft. of pavement could be added either behind the house or in
the front yard to provide a parking pad.
Staff notes that widening the driveway in the front yard might require the removal of some
existing landscaping. Widening the driveway behind the house would slightly reduce the
usable backyard space. The applicant should address the feasibility of these alternatives.
Staff further notes that some landscaping and berming have been installed in the front to
screen the circular drive from the street. However, no landscaping is provided between the
driveway and the affected neighbor.
OTHER VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
No major objections or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
SUMMARY/RECONIMEN12ATION
Staff typically supports requests for circular driveways on proper -ties fronting on busy arterial
streets. While this lot is near a curve, Linneman Road does not carry a large volume of
traffic and is not classified as an arterial. For purposes of creating additional parking area,
staff notes that the driveway could be widened by 9 feet to provide a parking pad without
variations. The applicant should address this alternative.
Staff notes that a gravel circular driveway currently exists on the lot and paving it would
likely improve it's appearance.
DMC:hg
VWL/
8/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1050 SOUTH LINNEMM ROAD
WHEREAS, George Steil (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for variations from a provision of Chapter 14
of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 1050 South Linneman Road (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property), legally described as;
Lot 3 in Steil's Subdivision of that part of the Northeast 1/4 of
Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016 to
allow a circular driveway and a variation from Section 14.1102.A.
to allow a front yard lot coverage of 48% rather than 35% as allowed
by code; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 39-V-91 before the Zoning Board of Appeals
of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 18th day of July, 1991,
pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount
Rrospect HgrA],d on the 2nd day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village have given further consideration to the variations requested
and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth
in Section 14.605 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of
Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the
Village to grant the variations as specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the following
variations:
1. A variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a
circular driveway
2. A variation from Section 14.1102 to allow a
48% front yard lot coverage
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations shall
remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
ZBA 39-V-91
Page 2 of 2
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604.E
of Chapter 14 of the Village code, the variations granted herein shall
be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins
within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in
the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol X. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
CTOR FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DMI0F PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 19, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-40-SU-91, ZBA41-V.91, ROBERT & DONNA GOTHAM
LOCATION: 625 MEIER ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use Permit and variation applications filed by Donna and Robert Gotham. The
applicants are requesting a Special Use Permit per Section 14.1001.C.7 to allow a three -
car garage, and a variation to Section 14.3016,A.3 to allow a 34 ft. wide driveway rather than
21 ft. as permitted by Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, Donna and Robert Gotham stated that they recently purchased the property
at 625 Meier Road and want to construct a three -car garage and associated wider driveway.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the Zoning Ordinance only allows three -car garages by
Special Use Permit and that wider driveways are also needed to accommodate the wider
garage. She noted that this is a very large lot and that lot coverage and setbacks are well
within the Code requirements.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that the requested driveway width
of 34 ft. would only be in front of the garage to provide a turn -around. The remainder of
the driveway would maintain the existing width of approximately 18 feet, as shown on the
site plan submitted.
Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a Special
Use Permit to allow a three -car garage and a variance to allow a 34 foot wide driveway at
625 Meier Road.
DMC:hg
Rv
I
100,
-XA0
Rv
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA UASE 40. AO -SU -91 Heamng %Ke: July 18, 1991
11-V-91
PETITIONER: Robert arid Donna Gotham
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 625 Meier Road
PUBLICATION DATE: July 2, 1.991
REQUEST: Special. Use permit per Section
14.100I.C.7 to allow a three -car
garage. Variation from, Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow a 34' wide
driveway rather than 21' as
permitted by Code,
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
?Michaele SRowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/iNTERFSTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a Special Use permit per Section
14.00I.0.7 to allow a three -car garage. Arid a Variation from
Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 34' wide driveway rather than
21' as permitted by, Code. I
The petitioners, Robert and. Donna Gotham of 3721 N.
Greenview, Chicago stating that they have recently purchased.
the property at 625 Meier Road and their request is for a
three -car garage and driveway width of 34' to get into the
garage. Mr. Gotham stated that they have three cars and two
children who will be driving soon.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that this is a very large lot and all setbacks are
more than suf0cient. Miss Farnham stated that the existing
garage wilL'be eonverted to living space and the lot coverage
is well belm; the requUement,
Mr. Lannon questioned if the 34' driveway width will go all
the way to the st,rc-"et.
ZBA-40-SU-91
ZBA-41-V-91
July 18, 1991
Page 2 of 2
f
Gotiham stated that just r thf� apron i i fror t 0 the garage
Ni I I be 34 ' -
(".7hairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petiti-)riers request for a Special IT se permit fora three -car
_g a rage.
Mr,. Cassidy moved. Ir. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: A.YES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Saviano,
B,rettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
motion carried. by a vote of 7-0.
Chair -man Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to°allow a 34' wide driveway.
Mr. BrPttrager moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON POLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pra,t1t, Cassidy, SAviano,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnlk
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board,
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 11, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-40-SU-91, ZBA41-V-91
APPLICANT: ROBERT AND DONNA GOTHAM
ADDRESS: 625 MEIER ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
L L
.......... . r ------ n
71
R
I! Dt
R X
RX
tr R
R3
R
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X, Single Family (large lot)
LOT SIZE: 193.581 x 331.58' (64,000 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 12%
F.A.R.: 0.10
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQ=
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit per Section 14.1001.C.7 to allow a three -
car garage.
The applicant is also requesting a variation to Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 34 ft. wide
driveway rather than 21 ft. as permitted by Code.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMEM AND CONCERN
Summary of application: The applicants purchased an existing house and plan to make
some significant improvements to the property. Besides room,,additions, the applicant is
proposing to construct an attached three -car garage and 34 ft. wide driveway for access to
the garage.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The property is zoned R -X and
consists of a very large (64,000 sq. ft.) lot. The proposed new garage will be approximately
865 sq. ft. (25' x 34V). The garage will be set back 86+ feet from the front lot line and 31+
feet from the side lot line. The existing garage will be converted to living area. Another
e:dsting old garage on the property will continue to be used as a storage building.
The proposed 34 ft. wide driveway is needed to maneuver vehicles in and out of the three -
car garage which is perpendicular to the rest of the home.
Staff notes that the applicant will dedicate 40 ft. of right-of-way along Meier Road and
connect to Village utilities. However, street improvements, including paving, curb and
garter, and sidewalks will be installed at the time street improvements are required for the
remaining three unimproved properties directly to the south. The Village does not realize
any significant benefit by requiring these improvements on a lot by lot basis. Instead, a
covenant will be drafted to guarantee that the improvements are made at the appropriate
time.
OXI(RAMIM Ihm-
The only concerns expressed by other Village staff relate to the right-of-way dedication and
street improvements. The applicant has discussed these issues with other staff and is aware
of the requirements in this regard.
Staff has no objections to the proposed three -car garage and 34 ft. wide driveway. The lot
is very large and the proposed construction should not appear out -of -scale or have any
negative impact on the surrounding properties. Staff notes that the lot coverage and
setbacks are well within Code requirements.
I)MC:hg
VWL/
8/12/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
C9MONLY KHQWN AS 625 MEIER ROAD
WHEREAS, Robert and Donna Gotham (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 625 Meier Road (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property), legally described as:
The West 1/2 of that part of Lot 1 lying North of the
South 5 acres thereof (excepting from said West 1/2 the
South 148 feet thereof) in Meier Brothers' Subdivision,
being a Subdivision of Parts of Section 10 and 15,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to
permit a driveway width of thirty four feet (341) at the garage
entrance, rather than the permitted 211 and a Special Use to permit
a 3 -car garage, as provided in section 14.1001.C.7.; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the requests being the
subject of ZBA Case No. 40 -SU -91 and ZBA 41-v-91 before the Zoning
Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 18th day
of July, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount prospect Herald on the 2nd day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 40 -SU -91 and ZBA 41-V-91 and have
determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect
would be served by granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.3016.A.3 to permit a driveway width of thirty four
feet (341) at the garage entrance and a special use permit as
provided in section 14.1001.0.7 to allow a 3 -car garage.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
ZBA 41-V-91
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILL-AGE OF MOUNT PROS--'ECTJ �
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENTk
1%
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager WL I.V IV tj
FROM:O David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning�
SUBJECT: ZBA-42-V-91, Walter Szarowicz - Appeal of Zoning Bgard Decision
LOCATION: 748 Whitegate Court
DATE: July 24, 1991
At their meeting of July 18, 1991, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-4 to deny variations
requested by Walter Szarowicz to accommodate widening of an existing driveway at 748
Whitegate Court. The following variations were denied:
1) Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 25' wide driveway rather than 21' as permitted by
code.
2) Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by code.
3) Section 14.1102 to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted
by code.
Subsequently, Mr. Szarowicz filed an application to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board
of Appeals. I
Following is a summary of the testimony regarding this case presented at the public hearing
on July 18, 1991.
At the meeting Mr. Szarowicz explained that he needs the additional driveway width to
accommodate his family's vehicles and to park a fishing boat and trailer on a paved surface
as required by code, without blocking the garage. He stated that his existing driveway is 18'
wide and he is proposing to add 7'.
Mr. Szarowicz also stated that he stores the boat during the winter (October 1 to March 31)
and uses it most weekends during the rest of the year.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the proposed 25' wide driveway is 4' wider than code
allows. Three feet of pavement could be added to the existing driveway without a variance
for driveway width. However, the lot currently exceeds the maximum 45% lot coverage
permitted. Therefore, any additional pavement results in the need for a lot coverage
variation. In addition, many requests for driveway width variations also result in the need
for a front yard lot coverage variation.
ZBA-42-V-91 - Walter Szarowicz July 24, 1991
Page Two
Ms. Farnham also noted that this variation request was filed in response to a complaint
about parking the boat trailer on the grass. Because this lot has side yards less than 7' wide,
it would be difficult to maneuver the boat into the rear yard without going through the
neighbor's yard. It would also require removal of parts of an existing fence.
Four neighboring residents were present at the meeting to express concerns about the
proposed driveway widening. They had concerns about this driveway being wider than all
others on the block and about parking of a boat and trailer on the driveway.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was noted that Village Codes do not
prohibit parking of boats and trailers on the driveway. Some members stated that similar
variance requests for parking pads have been granted in the past. Some concerns were
expressed about the additional lot coverage.
Accordingly, by a 3-4 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of the
variations request by Walter Szarowicz to accommodate widening of the driveway at 748
Whitegate Court.
P
jp4&ai ana rroposea 81teMallve ria
The Zoning Ordinance states that "any individual may file an appeal of the (Zoning Board
of Appeals) decision with the Village Board". Such appeal must be filed within 15 days of
the Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Szarowicz met this timetable.
All objectors who spoke at the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting have been notified of the
appeal.
To overturn the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals, an extraordinary vote of the
Village Board is required.
In conjunction with the appeal filed, Mr. Szarowicz submitted an alternative plan for
widening his driveway. The alternative plan indicates that the driveway be tapered from 25'
next to the garage to 21' at the property line (please see attached site plan). The driveway
would be 25' wide for a total length of 17' and then taper to a width of 21'. This would
result in an overall lot coverage of 48.5% (48.8% originally requested) and a front yard lot
coverage of 38.9% (39.9% originally requested).
Another alternative would be to only widen the driveway to 21' which is the maximum width
permitted by code. This would eliminate the driveway width variation and the front yard
lot coverage variation. However, a variance would still be needed to allow additional lot
coverage which would total 47.3% of the lot area, 2.3% more than code permits.
JF:cl
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 42-V-91
Hearing Date: July 18, 1991
PETITIONER:
Walter Szarowicz
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
748 Whitegate
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 2, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow 25' wide
driveway rather than 211 as
permitted by Code. Section
14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot
coverage rather. than 45% as
permitted by Code. Section
14.1102.A to allow 39.9% front
yard lot coverage rather than
35% as permitted by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variances from Section 14.3016.A.3
to allow a 25' wide driveway rather than 21' as permitted by
Code; Section 14-1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather
than 45% as permitted by Code and Section 14.1102.A to allow
39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by
Code.
The petitioner, Walter Szarowicz of 748 Whitegate, presented
his case stating that he moved from Chicago to Mount Prospect
in April of 1991. He stated that he owns a fishing boat which
lie had parked ne.,:t to the driveway. Mr. Szarowicz stated that
his boat is 17' I.Ong and 4' off the ground. Mr. Szarowicz
stated he would like to t4iden his driveway to park his boat
which is currently in the garage. Mr. Szarowicz stated that
he also has four cars.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the Codes require trailers to be parked on a
Fj-
paved surface. Miss,
proposing r" of add,
driveway. Miss Farr
maximum :1 of coverag(
maximum which is cot
standard sized lots
applicant address wl
permitted by Code wa
could be, tapers frot
Wes Pinchot, 747 Wh
character of the ne
Petitioner can make
Mr. Lannon asked Mr
driveway width or t
Mr. Pinchot stated
that, other driveway
David Lindgren, 743
being parked on the
homes and the appea
Anthony *ludo, 742 W
boat parked on the
Margaret:, 8zostak, 7
wider driveway is n
block.
The Board. suggested
Mr. Clements, Direc
that it must be par
Mass Farnham stated
fence make it a lmos
yard without trespe
Mr. Pratt asked whe
Mr. Saarowi.cz stag
south side from Oct
home from April 1 t
weekend during this:
Mr. Pinchot, stated
request.
LBA-42-V-91
July 18, '1591
Page 2 of 3
1 r'rnham sta ted that the p"e"'.i t.i otner i
4 Iota ,1
pavement to the existing 18' wide
wham „Mated t"t the lot rr, at the
t Aso front yard covera,, is over the
amcin whenever dr:ive"ewaYs arw% j dened on
) Iss Farnhaatta s�uggest.ed that: the '
Miter a 21' wide dri`vewa&which is
u)d neat, his needs, t r z.f the drivewa F
t ' to 2l'.
t'egate, stated that the boat alters the
ghhorhood. Mr'. Pinchot fej1s the
other arrangements to store the boat.
'Kinehot if he's concerned with the
e;' boat .
what he is concerned about both, noting
on the block meet Code for width.
W�iitegate,'stated that hefeels the boat
driveway will: decrease the value of the
rkce of the neighborhood,
hi`tegat.e, state that he dies not like the
3r'wiv°away'
41, Whitegat.e,,stated that the proposed
ot: in conformity with the rest of the
to park it in the rear yard.
tar of Planning and Zoning,stated
ked on a payed surface.
t a.t: the rnaitow sideyard nrs°nd e; fisting
t Amposs ib.le to get the bb into the back'
sting on the neighbors pyVerty.
it he stores it in the winter.
d that he stores it in a mr.ina on the
crlra'er 1 to March 31. He Parks it at, his
o t'8eptember 30 and typically uses it every-
time
he does not sage a hardship in this
N
ZBA-42-V-91
July 18, 1991
Page 3 of 3
The Board then generally discussed the petitioners request.
Mr. Lannon stated that the Village permits trailers on a
paved surface and about a month ago the Zoning Board approved
a similar request. Mr. Lannon stated that the petitioner has
agreed to taper the driveway width.
Mr. Brettrager stated he has concerns on the lot coverage.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brettrager, Skowron
NAYS: Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 3-4.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
06
2 1
Vx-j,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPER A'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W--,
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JULY 11, 1991
ZBA42-V-91
WALTER SZAROWICZ
748 WHITEGATE COURT
L LJ LJ H LJ I
--Ir-'_1 I�,C�d �,� r
�'I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R. :
R -I Single Family Residential
67.75' x 120' (8,130 sq. ft.)
48.8% (proposed); 39.9% (proposed front
N/A
E
f
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate widening of an existing
driveway:
Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 25 ft. wide driveway rather than 21 ft. as permitted by
Code.
2. Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code.
3. Section 14.1102.A to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as
permitted by Code.
WF.Mmomm"m OKI &WX
0
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to add 7 ft. of pavement to his existing
18 ft. wide driveway. The resulting 25 ft. wide driveway increases the front yard lot coverage
from 29.5% to 39.9% and the overall lot coverage from 46.5% to 48.8%. Variations are
required to allow this additional lot coverage.
The wider driveway is intended to accommodate the family's four vehicles and fishing boat.
Staff notes that this application was filed in response to a complaint about parking the boat
-trailer on the grass.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The proposed 7 feet of additional
pavement will line up with a sidewalk along the west side of the house which is .83 ft. from
the lot line. A strip of grass about 7 feet wide will remain between the parking pad and the
neighbor's garage.
The sideyard setbacks are less than 7 feet wide on this lot and the rear yard is entirely
fenced. For these reasons it could be difficult to transfer the boat and trailer to the rear
yard without removing the fence and going through the neighbor's yard.
Staff notes that no other driveways in the immediate block have been widened for parking
pads. Because the existing driveway is only 18 feet wide, three more feet could be added
without a variation. The applicant should discuss the need for a driveway wider than 21
feet.
A front yard lot coverage variation is necessary in most cases where a driveway is widened
on a standard -sized lot. The overall lot coverage variation is needed because the existing
lot has a non -conforming lot coverage. Any additional pavement would require a lot
coverage variation on this lot.
RINDIAMI M
I W&IMOK,
No major comments or objections were stated by other Village staff. Engineering notes that
the existing drainage pattern flows from west to east. Additional driveway pavement may
not alter this pattern.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The applicant has a boat and trailer that must be parked on a paved surface. This request
is an attempt to provide a parking area without blocking the garage. Staff notes that 3 feet
of additional pavement could be added without a variation to driveway width or front yard
lot coverage. The applicant should address whether a 21 foot wide driveway meets his
needs. Staff further notes that any additional pavement on this lot results in the need for
a lot coverage variation because the existing lot has a non -conforming coverage of 46.5%.
DMC:hg
1/
/2'
"Coxi-e/i
Pov�inanfJ
x
W r .. �^' /fmp^CaAI^ •
Jlrr fKEMc+,i A. PAW
GM ,�
`mMM+
P50
o
wM I
t"' eG1'rt'
4.1
..a..r, n.✓Airi rria .. fir.
pry $
es'4
9
G+ter t O. �f8
7
=PMWI-
e
cG
Fi"�6fdy L.::,c
s
I
�
Iw s,•
i
rs Gd
Oh
I
�!
-_� - �'^p C^: aid iP.iS W..;ti_ 1....'. ♦,
rr Q JI, 1'wu► r
i
��! �0� m�..S
0, X-v ri.M
_..M.
d
p`4 /46ArR
WN1
/MRr
i
amaMsmMrr�IiMatfiE�f .!!'arMrt�
� -.,, `'
/2'
VWL/
08/15/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 748 WHITEGATE 9OURT
WHEREAS, Walter Szarowicz (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 748 Whitegate Court (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 2 in Central Village being a Subdivision of the
Northeast 1/4 of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11,
East of the Third Principal meridian, in cook County,
Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner requested variations from Section 14-3016.A.3
to allow a 251 driveway width rather than 211 as permitted by Code,
Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather than 45%, and
Section 14.1102.A to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather
than the permitted 35%; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 42-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 18th day of
July, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the 2nd day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals had authority fo hear and
decide on the variations in ZBA Case No. 42-V-91; and
WHEREAS, after considering evidence and testimony the Zoning Board
of Appeals denied the request; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner chose to file an appeal of the decision of
the Zoning Board of Appeals as provided for in Section 14.604.D of
the Village Code; and
WHEREAS, the Village Board reviewed the appeal request of Walter
Szarowicz and concur with the findings of the Zoning Board of
Appeals in ZBA Case. No. 42-V-91.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby deny the appeal of Walter Szarowicz and
concur with the findings of the Zoning Board of Appeals in ZBA Case
No. 42-V-91.
SECTION THREE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant a variation on a revised site plan
to permit a 47.3% lot coverage rather than 45% as stated in section
14.1102.E to allow the installation of a conforming 211 driveway.
ZBA 42-V-91
Paige 2 of 2
SECTION FOUR: Except for the variations granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION SIX: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-43-V-91, Anthony Sacco
LOCATION: 1818 Aztec Lane
DATE: July 29, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your Consideration their recommendation for
a variance application for a variance application filed by Anthony Sacco. The applicant is
requesting a variance to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 1' 5" side yard to accommodate an
existing deck addition.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting Anthony and Annette Sacco presented testimony in support of their request.
Mr. Sacco explained that the lower tier was added to the main deck to provide a step. He
acknowledged that a permit was obtained for the main deck but not the lower deck. He
also stated that a wood fence was installed to screen the deck from the neighbor. In
addition, the lower deck is located over an existing patio.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the setback requirements were indicated at the time
the permit was issued for the main deck and lower tier was installed in violation of the
required setbacks. She explained that the applicant's lot is severely wedge shaped, with
angled lot lines that result in decreasing side yards and contribute to the need for a
variation. She also noted that the lower deck is only 8" above ground level and will be
screened by a solid fence from the affected neighbor. Staff has concerns with reducing the
side yard so significantly. She suggested that a smaller step would serve the same purpose
and allow a larger side yard.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that the deck addition covers an
existing patio area and doesn't increase lot coverage. Concerns were expressed about the
applicant constructing the lower deck without a permit. It was also noted that the deck will
be screened from the affected neighbor. Accordingly, by a 4-1 vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of a variance to allow a 1' 5" side yard to accommodate a
deck addition at 1818 Aztec Lane.
JF:c1
E
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Z13A CASE. '�O43-"'--91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
PETI'1'r,0NFR.
Anthony Sacco
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1818 Aztec
Pl-'BLTCA'rI()N DATE:
July 9, 1991
REQUEST:
Variation from Section
14.1102.B.1 to allow
construction of a deck addition
which will come as close to I'-
5" to the side lot line at the
narrowest point and 8'-8" at the
widest point.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section t4.1102.B.1
to allow construction of a deck addition which will come as
close as 1'-5" to the side lot line at the narrowest point
and 8'-8" at the widest point.
The petitioner, Anthony Sacco of 1818 Aztec, presented his
case stating that he built a deck in his rear yard with a
permit from the Village, Mr. Sacco stated that he also put a
step from the deck to his yard which is encroaching into his
side yard. Mr. Sacco stated that he didn't realize the step
was to large. He also stated that he installed a fence with a
permit along the side lot line to block the neighbors view.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village o ' f Mount Prospect,
stated that the main deck was installed with a permit and the
petitioner was notified at that time that the step could not
be put in without a variation. Miss Farnham stated that the
step does make it easier to get down to ground level. Miss
Farnham stated that the fence does screen the deck from the
neighbor but staff feels there will be a maintenance problem
with such a narrow 1.5' sideyard. She noted that the lot is
angled which contributes to the need for the variation but
ZBNS43-V-91
JU41 25, 1991
Pago 2 of 2
but staff feels the sizq Of the <step should, be (fe r ea, s e d
chairman Rognik asked M& Sacco why he put the s lep in
whaw permission fromlitbe Village.
mr, sa-ca stated that hk has an existing patio under the deck
which was installed wheA his home was unincorporated. Mr.
Sacco stated that he didn't want half concrete and half deck
in his rear yard, Mr, Sacco stated that he didnVt realize the
step was that wide and he manages to cut the graps, in that
area.
Mr. Cassidy asked the pqtitioner if the deck covers the
concrete patio.
4r. Sacco stated that the deck does cover the concrete patio.
Mr. Sacco also stated that he has 9, pie shaped lot and he
installed a wood fence.jMr. Sacco stated that Kdoesn't
feel he's infringing ontanyone.
Mr. Cassidy stated that�the was informed by staffthat he
couldn't put in a step Without a variation.
Mr. Sacco stated he was� ' told he could put in a step but not
informed on the size.
Mr. Lannon stated that the impact has been screened with the
fence.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for'j'a 1'-05" sideyard to an Q-8" sideyard
for construction of a deck as indicated on peti't'ioners
exhibit 1 1.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy-
NAYS:
assidyNAYS: B:asnik
Motion carried by a vote of 4-1.
This case must still be,,,,,heard before the Villagy—Board.
Michelle Thompson,�,
Recording Secretarf;
V
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W --
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-43-V-91
APPLICANT: ANTHONY SACCO
ADDRESS: 1818 AZTEC LANE
LOCATION MAP:
17
L
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 9,433 sq. R.
% COVERAGE: 39.8%
FAR.: N/A
Gil B ' asnik, Chairman Page 2
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
REQ S
The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14,1102,13.1 to allow construction of a deck
addition which will come as close as 1'-5" to the side lot line at the narrowest point and 8%
8" at the widest point. The Zoning Code requires a 10 ft. sideyard setback on this lot,
I
IIMMMWH� -
Summary of application: 'The applicant is seeking a variation to allow a lower tier on an
existing deck to remain as constructed. The lower tier projects 8 ft. and comes as close as
I' -F to the lot line. The required sideyard on this lot is 10 feet. A permit was obtained
for the main deck structure, however, the lower tier was added without approval.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is severely
wedge-shaped, with a 105 ft. frontage and 30 ft. rear width. In addition, the house is not
parallel to the lot lines, consequently the sideyards progressively decrease from front to
re ar.
The deck attached to the back of the house is approximately 1.5 ft. off the ground. The tier
which is approximately 8" above grade provides an intermediate step to the ground. The
tier was placed over an existing paved patio. The tier extends less than 2 ft. from the east
facade of the house.
Staff has some concerns about reducing the sideyard so drastically. 'The remaining 1%5"
sideyarcl could pose maintenance problems and, being half the width of a typical sidewalk,
presents an obstacle to through -traffic, since the tier will also be above grade. To increase
the setback, part of the tier would have to be removed. Staff notes that a solid wood fence
exists along the property line so the deck and tier are screened from the affected neighbor.
Because it is so low to the ground, the tier does not have much bulk, therefore minimizing
the impact on the neighbor. '
OTHER VILLAGE $TAFF COMMEM
No major objections or concerns were expressed by other Village staff. If the variance is
granted, a permit should be obtained to valiclify the tier construction.
SIMMARY/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has some concerns about reducing the sideyard so significantly. Staff notes that the
wedge -shape of the lot and the angled lot lines contribute to the need for the variance.
If the purpose of the lower tier is to provide a step to the main deck, this could have been
accomplished by a much smaller, lower tier with less encroachment into the sideyard. The
property owner was aware of the setback requirements as authorized on the original permit,
and installed the lower tier in violation of the required setbacks. Staff recommends that the
lower section be cut back to a 3 ft. width to serve as a step, leaving a 7 ft. sideyard.
DMC:hg
VWL/
8/12/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1818 AZTEC LANE
WHEREAS, Anthony Sacco (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners)
have filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 1818 Aztec Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 178 in Brickman Manor Third Addition, Unit No. 2,
being a subdivision in the southwest 1/4 of Section 24,
Township 42 North, Range 11 east of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois,
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to allow a 1151,
side yard, rather than the required 101, to accomodate an existing
deck addition; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 43-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of July,
1991 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Prgspect Herald on the 9th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards
set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the
Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would
be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as
specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1
to allow a 11511 side yard rather than the required 101 to
accomodate an existing deck addition.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by-law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and • this day •
deraid L. Parley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
NEM
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager �0%u
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-44-V-91, Gary & Mary Parlakian
LOCATION: 503 South Elmhurst Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Gary & Mary Parlakian. The applicant is requesting the
following variances to accommodate installation of a circular driveway at 503 South
Elmhurst Road:
Section 14.3016-A.1 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow front yard lot coverage of 53.8% rather than 35% as
allowed by Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting Mary Parlakian presented testimony in support of the request. She stated that
it is very difficult and dangerous to back out onto Elmhurst Road. She indicated that the
family has three cars and the 17' wide driveway would alloy✓ two cars to be parked side-
by-side without blocking each other. She also stated that a circular driveway would be more
attractive than a parking pad and she would landscape it with flowers and evergreen shrubs.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that circular driveways have merit on busy arterial streets for
safety purposes. She noted that a parking pad could be installed without a variation.
However, to function as a turnaround, it would have to be located near the front lot line.
Staff also noted that overall lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting letters were submitted by two
neighbor-, objecting to the variations. Concerns were expressed about the amount of front
yard lot coverage proposed and it was noted that a parking pad could be added without
variations. Members also acknowledged that safety should be given careful consideration
on such a busy roadway.
Accordingly, by a vote of 2-3, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of a
variation to allow a circular driveway and 53.8% front yard lot coverage at 503 South
Elmhurst Road.
JF:c1
SURVEY � LAT 17081
TEL. NO. W 1224
BAUER SURVEYING
2045 S. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS Rif.
SUITE 10&A
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005
Lot 3 and the South half of Lot 2 in Block 5 in Prospect Perk Subdivision No. 1, being
a Subdivision of the west half of the North 60 rode of the Southwest quarter of vection
1.2, Township 41 North, Range ll, East of the !bird Principal Meridian, in Cook Ccunty,
Illinois.
a
n _r
la o
er
Yr.o. .
4
^.t ro 1 M Y
k
f-
{
�1C
15,
Wow
" � .^✓' a+�h r@,uUL, •1� "' -F S1eu of Iamol•
_.. ,.. Order No.._...B,od.___�-`- 6.1 Courcy of Cook ss
_ _ _ a'r .w.• _
011ltl_...�5.�..�.S9r`.�..�...—�-4a(� ",�iKr{.Q% � 4Kj. � /1I t, _ a nrd
Ordsted By Crar'r Ce M sere et. Lind Sur"yor do hereby WIty 1'.aat a •uMy of
IM above doeodbed plop" hu bekn mpka under
my atfp$Melon and mot the plot h..W dra— la a
Scale 1 inch = �..,.�! feed. po,0ct fepreNMpbn of eaN suryaY eorrected to s
oistances are shonm In feet and decimal parte theted. lemparpura of a2' FshrdnheN.
Compile all points beforo Wilding and p once report any difforenee,
Essamenta and buadlno finals shown par racon/ad Subdfylotol Rots. Septeetber 12, 1990
War tot Dead. T41e 1`911CY and ftW Zoolno raMWollmamIS IW addition's REGI. Ilk.. LAND SUFAVEYbR
building 11.06 and esaama•t tsltactlofra' N.:. 1110
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 44-V-91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
PETITIONER:
Gary and Mary Parlakian
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
503 S. Elmhurst Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 9, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular
driveway. Section 14.1102.A to
allow a front yard lot coverage
of 53.8% rather than 35% as
allowed by Code. Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow a 17' wide
driveway for a one -car garage
rather than 15' as permitted by
Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016.A.1
to allow a circular driveway. Section 14.1102.A to allow a
front yard lot coverage of 53.8% rather than 35% as allowed
by Code. Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 17' wide driveway for
a one -car garage rather than 151 as permitted by Code.
The I petitioner, Mary Parlakian of 503 S. Elmhurst Road,
presented her case stating that her home is on Elmhurst Road
which is a very busy street and it is difficult to Pull Out
of their driveway. Mrs. Parlakian also stated that they have
three cars and they need more room for parking.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect
stated that the petitioner is requesting three variations.
the first variation for the circular driveway can only be
allowed by variation. She noted that the petitioner lives on
Route 83which is a major arterial road. Circular Drives and
turnarounds are often justified for safety purposes on busy
arterial roads. The second request is to widen the existing
S
ZbA
4 4 -V-911
ju'7 1 25, 1991
P age 2 of 4
t,11 wide to IT' the thArd request is for
yard. Miss Farnham -stated
Zidditional pa%-i.ng in 1,�',,je front
th,at the first. %,�ariati' n could be eliminated by putting in a
turn around but it would ha', -e to be located in; the middle of
the front Yard which e y riot be as attractive as a landscaped
circular drive. The Oe"-ement is
additional 3"of pa,,
needed to allow two rats to be parked side by side in the
driveway. Miss Fa rnham" stated that a similar request was
granted last week ona.,ji','Jess busy road and the , petitioner, is
planning to landscape ith flowers and evergrei?h shrubs.
Chairman Basnik (.-juesti"'pried an I.D.O.T, permit for the second
opening and the likliftbbd of :it being approved;
David Clements, Directbr sof Planning and Zonink stated that
last year on Route 83 dust soi.1th of Lorinquist T.D.O.T.
granted a similar reqUest.
Mr. Lannon stated they;also granted one on Euclid.
Chairman Basnik then road a letter from Mr. pbter Kaufman of
1�
505 S. Elmhurst-, which ,"stated that they have liive'd there since
1957 and has bad no Problems pulling out onto route 83, nor
had any pi-eViOLIS own 6' and noted that the petit I. one r has
seve'automobilesral automobiles an. feels this would deprer, ate the
property value.
Chairman Basnik then ,"ad a letter from L.G. Al'arinowski
stating that the e, circl4ar driveway would chan4,1,
t h e character
of the neighborhood..
Mr. Saviano asked if the motorists backing out,,,_can see past
the walk.
Miss Farnham stated that the Village Code does, not allow
11
cars parked beyond the sidewalk in the right-,st_way which
could obstruct vision''
Mr. Cassidy asked the' etitioner how many cars they have.
'Mrs. Parlakian statedjthat they have 3 cars and have a very
hard time backing out"f the driveway in the morning and
afternoon. Their work, hours are different and /,cars must be
,l
shuffled.
Mr. Pratt asked the petitioner if they undersi6od staffs
alternative plan of a, arking pad.
Mrs. Parlakian stated�that she doesn't think jj will look
nice and stated they Axe planning to plant nice flowers and
E
ZBA-44-%'-91
July 25, 1991
Page 3 of 4
shrubs.
Mr. Cassidy stated a concern for the front lot coverage
variation.
Chairman Basnik questioned the hardship of the request.
Mrs. Parlakian stated the hardship is safety and parking.
She also stated that she has counted 4 circular driveways on
Elmhurst Road from Golf Road to Lincoln.
The Board then generally discussed the request.
Mr. Cassidy stated that he objects to the request and feels a
parking pad would be sufficient.
Mr. Lannon and Mr. Saviano stated their concerns for safety.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a variance to Section 14.3016.A.1 to
allow a circular driveway and to Section 14,1102.A to allow
front yard lot coverage of 53.8%.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded,
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano
NAYS: Pratt, Cassidy, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 2-3.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a 17' wide driveway.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Basnik
NAYS: None
motion carried by a vote of 5 -0 -
Mr. Cassidy then moved to prepare Resolution number Z-44-91
to record the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the
petitioners request for a 17' wide driveway.
Mr. Pratt seconded.
S
UPO\' ROLL CALL'
'9 )tion carried b
'rhis case- must s
n, Pratt, S
k
5-0.
rd before t
Nich,elle
Reconding
41-V-91
25, 1991,
4 of 4
s idy,
Board.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W�
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.:
ZBA-44-V-91
APPLICANT:
GARY AND MARY PARLkKIAN
ADDRESS:
503 SOUTH ELMHURST AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
74)
t Lj
7"P
R,2
X
J
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 75' x 151.8'(11,390 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 26.9%; 53.8% proposed front yard
F.A.R.: N/A
E
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUEST
The ;applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate a proposed circular
driveway:
1. Section 14.3016-A.__ to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow front yard lot coverage of 53.8% rather than 35%
as allowed by Code.
3. Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 17 ft. wide driveway for a one -car garage rather
than 15 ft. as permitted by Code.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a circular driveway.
Circular driveways are only permitted by variation. The applicants also plan to add 3 ft. to
their existing 14 ft. wide driveway. A maximum width of 15 ft. is permitted for one -car
garages. The proposed additional pavement increases the front yard lot coverage to 53.8%.
Code only allows 35%.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot fronts on
Elmhurst Road (Rt. 83) which is classified as a major arterial. Backing onto Elmhurst Road
could be dangerous since traffic is quite heavy and steady. Tice house is set back almost 40
ft. from the front lot line. This provides more space for a circular driveway.
In addition to the circular driveway, the applicant would like to increase the width of the
existing driveway to 17 ft. This would allow a car to be parked in the driveway without
blocking the garage. Widened driveways and parking pads are a common request associated
with homes with one -car garages.
The existing front yard lot coverage is 20.4%. The proposed additional pavement will
increase the front yard lot cover to 53.8%. Most requests for driveway widening and circular
drives result in excessive front yard coverage.
An alternative which would reduce or eliminate the variations, would be to construct a
parking pad perpendicular to the existing driveway. A parking pad could be used as a turn-
around and provide a space to park a car without blocking the garage. A parking pad up
to 15 ft. wide, perpendicular to the driveway would not require a driveway width variation.
Staff notes that a parking pad would have to project on the South side of the existing drive,
as the north sideyard is not deep enough to accommodate a full parking stall. While this
would reduce the amount of paving, it might not look as finished, or formal as the proposed
circular driveway.
Proposals to widen one -car driveways to accommodate two cars are fairly common in
response to the fact that most households today have two or more vehicles. However, if a
circular drive or a parking pad were constructed, the need for the additional driveway width
is less apparent, since a car could be parked on the circular drive and not block the garage.
?I
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
OTHER VILLAGE S1ME,,CQMMEN:E5
Inspection Services notes that an additional access onto Elmhurst Road requires a permit
from I.D.O.T. No other comments or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
The proposed circular drive has merit on a lot fronting on a busy arterial road, such as
Elmhurst Road. Staff has some concerns about the amount of front yard coverage resulting
from the proposed additional pavement. Staff requests that the applicant discuss the
feasibility of a parking pad/turn-around and whether it would meet their needs. The
applicant should also justify the need for the additional 3 ft. of pavement on the existing
driveway.
Staff notes that overall lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
DMC:hg
q
VWL/
08/14/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY -KNOWN AS 5,03 SOUTH KMMS-T ROAD
WHEREAS, Gary and Mary Parlakian (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed an application for a variation from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 503 South Elmhurst Road (hereinafter referred to
as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 3 and the South half of Lot 2 in Block 5 in Prospect
Park subdivision No. 1, being a Subdivision of the West
half of the North 60 rods of the Southwest quarter of
Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016.A.1 to
permit a circular driveway, and a variation from Section 14.1102.A
to allow a front yard lot coverage of 53.8%, as allowed by the
Village Code.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 44-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
July, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Hognt Prosgggt Herald on the 9th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 44-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO, The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.3016.A.1 to permit a circular driveway resulting
in a front yard lot coverage of 53.8% rather than 35% as allowed
in Section 14.1102.A.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
ZBA 44-V-91
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President'
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager�,�
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-47-V-91, Ulrich Marks
LOCATION: 600 Carboy Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Ulrich Marks. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.2202.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' to accommodate a building addition at 600
Carboy Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting, Ulrich Marks presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Marks
explained that he is proposing to construct an 8,918 square foot building addition onto an
existing industrial building. The existing lot is quite small and the size of building addition
proposed is needed to allow maximum space utilization.
Renaldo Maniang, Architect, presented a floor plan and landscape plan. He indicated that
he has discussed the issue of on-site detention with the Village Engineering Department and
believes adequate detention storage can be provided in underground holding tanks.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that this is an existing non -conforming lot in terms of size
which contributes to the need for the variation. She noted that the addition would occupy
a green area currently used for on-site detention. She noted that the proposed addition
would primarily impact a parking lot and that landscaping could be provided to soften it's
impact.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that this is one of the most
attractively kept properties on the block. Some concerns were expressed about detention
requirements, and it was noted that on-site detention standards must be met to obtain a
building permit.
Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variance to allow a 10' rear yard at 600 Carboy Road, conditioned on:
1. Landscape plan approval by staff.
JF:c1
I \I'T -ES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
"IOLNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE %0, 17 -%*--91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
FIETI-IONER:
Ulrich 'larks
SI..B,7FCT PROPERTY:
600 Carboy
PATE:
'JuI3- 9, 1991
REQUEST:
Variation from Section 14.2202.0
to allow a rear yard of tO' to
accommodate a proposed 8,918
sq.ft. building addition.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.2202.1'
to allow a rear yard of 10' to accommodate a proposed 8,918
sq,ft building addition. Code requires a 20' rear yard
setback.
The petitioner, Ulrich Marks of 335 S. Leonard, Arlington
Heights, presented his case stating that he needs more space
at his present building at 600 Carboy and would like to build
a 8,918 square feet addition.
Renaldo Manalang, Architect for Mr. Marks, stated that the
addition will occupy 10' of the 20' setback. Mr. Manalang
stated that there will still be 10' of space in the rear
yard. Mr. Manalang stated that the petitioner plans to do
extensive landscaping. He also stated that they have talked
to the owner to the rear and they stated no objections. Mr.
Manalang stated that adequate detention will be provided and
they have consulted engineers.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that staff is concerned about the large size of the
addition and that the applicant should justify the need for
the space. Miss Farnham stated that the addition is taking up
major green space currently used for detention. The project
and will have to conform to the detention requirements in
3
ZBA 4 i -V-9 1
July; 25, 1991
Page; 2 of 2
order to obtain a buildaing permit. She also stated that this
property is in ..an I-1 zoning distracrton a 1 acre parcel
which is existing ani' non-Anf°orminG noting; current 1-1 standards
requires parcels to be ;l ra.aares. Staff suggests approval be
swGtr.,es, to approved ian scapinr.
mr, . n sicdy asked if the petitioner raddressed the staffs
concerns about. detention.
Mr. Manalang stated that, the engineers feel the building
addition will not reriuile a lot of additional detention
noting t:hat, the property also has a parking lot"and existing
green space which can be utilized for detention.`Mr, Manal.ang
stated they may possibly put in underground culverts for
detention.
Mr. wtanalang then presented the Board with landscape plan
drawings.
Mr. Cassidy asked about(the culverts.
Mr. Clements„ director of Planning and Zoning stated that
culverts could be used as detention storage.
"Miss Farnham stated that she talked to Chuck Bencic of
Inspection Services an+d>he also mentioned culverts could be
used for this project.'
The Board then discussed and had no objections.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request fora 101 rearward to accommodate a
proposed 8,915 square ,,f° et MAKI addition as,'#resented on
exhibit 12 subject tojandscape plan approval by Village
staff.
Mr. Pratt moved. Mr. C;a"sid;y seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: .Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
1a.snik
NAYS: N ne
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This Case must still telheard before the Village;; Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary,
M
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMANL PLANNING AND ZONING
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-47-V-91
APPLICANT: ULRICH MARKS
ADDRESS: 600 CARBOY ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1.1 Light Industrial
LOT SIZE: 209' x 2331 (48,90 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 72%
F.A.R. : 0.47
5'
VWL/
8/13/91
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 600 CARBOY ROAD
WHEREAS, Ulrich Marks, (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
600 Carboy Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property),
legally described as:
Lot 5 in Elmhurst -Algonquin Industrial Park, Unit No. 2, being
a subdivision in the southeast 1/4 of Section 23, Township 41
North, range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian,
according to the plat thereof recorded June 20, 1968 as
Document No. 20409121, in Cook County, Illinois
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.2202.0 to
permit a ten foot (101) rear yard setback instead of the required
20 feet in order to construct an 8,918 square foot building
addition onto an existing industrial building.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 47-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of July,
1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
MountProspect Hergld on the 9th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 47-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.2202.0 to permit a ten foot (101) rear yard setback
for a building addition.
UCTION THREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
RA
ZBA 47-V-91
Page 2 of 2
aEgU_QF fDU&L This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
�Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
'1991.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John F. Dixon, Village Manager WTI-,
FROM:
David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT:
ZBA-48-SU-91, Rogers Corporate Park
LOCATION:
1840-1894 South Elmhurst Road
DATE:
July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use Permit application filed by Arthur J. Rogers and Company. The applicant
is requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D,) Ordinance #4156 to
allow limited retail uses in Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest comer of Elmhurst
Road and Algonquin Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991.
At the meeting William Schmidt, Chief Executive Officer for A. J. Rogers and Company,
presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Schmidt explained that several
prospective tenants have expressed interest in limited retail uses. In response, A. J. Rogers
and Company would like to allow limited retailing as an accessory to permitted industrial
uses.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the limited retail would
not include day-to-day retail activities that could potentially disrupt other industrial tenants
and create conflicts for available parking. He noted that this property was recently rezoned
from B-3 Commercial District and is surrounded by commercial/retail uses. Subsequently,
retail uses may be generally compatible with the area, but should be reviewed on a case
specific basis for compatibility.
Mr. Clements recommended that limited retail uses be allowed by a field change to the
existing Planned Unit Development. This would allow review by the Village Manager and
the Village Board on a case specific basis.
Mr. Clements stated that staff's major concern was parking. He explained that 165 spaces
are needed to meet parking demand for the proposed 20% office/80% warehouse mix of
uses. He indicated that 211 spaces would be needed to accommodate a 10% retail factor.
The corporate park provides 201 spaces which staff believes will be adequate to meet
anticipated parking demand. He noted that parking impact could be measured through the
field change process.
ZBA-48-SU-91, Rogers Corporate Park
Page Two
July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was noted that many potential limited
retail uses might generate parking demand on weekends rather than during the week when
other tenants are in operation. The Zoning Board concurred with the conditions suggested
by staff. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of
an amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance #4156 to allow limited retailing, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Field change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence by the Village Board.
2. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the total floor area of an I-1 use.
3. Limited retailing shall be approved in writing by the property owner and property
manager.
4. No additional signs shall be allowed for retail uses.
JF:c1
'L
a
ALGONQUIN ROAD
ry
i rf i i
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 48 -SU -91
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
Arthur J. Rogers & Co.
1840-1894 Elmhurst Road and
401-501 Algonquin Road
July 9, 1991
An Amendment to Special Use
Ordinance No. 4156 per Section
14.2201.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: Robert Brettrager
Micheale Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting an amendment to Special Use
Ordinance No. 4156 per Section 14.2201. The amendment would
allow limited retail in the Rogers Corporate Park Planned
Unit Development, as incidental to a permitted I -I use.
The petitioner, William Schmitz of Arthur J. Rogers & Co,
presented the case stating that Rogers Corporate Park would
like an amendment to allow limited retail uses. Mr. Schmitz
stated that they had a recent client who was going to lease
10,000 square feet but wanted to have retail sales on
Saturdays and Sundays. They lost the client because they
could not accomodate their need for limited retailing. Mr.
Schmitz stated that Arthur J. Rogers & Co. will have total
control over the limited use and no space would be solely
leased as retail. Mr. Schmitz also stated that the Village
would benefit by additional sales tax. He also noted the
potential for spill over effects to other surrounding
retails. Mr. Schmitz stated that there will be no adverse
affect to neighbors or existing tenants and the corporate
park has adequate parking. Mr. Schmitz also stated that they
generally agree with staff recommendations but are requesting
150 of the space as retail to be available for limited.tekVu(-
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this would be an amendment to the Planned Unit Development
for the property at E
rezoned in March of I
does not allow retail
the petitioner does h
manufacturers kitchen
type of showcase area
use, Mr. Clements sta
that the leasing will
realizes this. W Cl
amended through with
and Village Board. Mr
retail should not hav
primary concern was r
that 165 spaces are r
caLculated at a rate
Using a retail factor
be 211 spaces. The Cc
Clements stated that
amount.
Chairman Basnik quest
parking.
Mr. Clements stated t
spaces is sufficient
increase demand. He I
measured during the i
stated that no additi
The Board then generE
and had no objection<
Chairman Basnik then
petitioners request
No. 4156 per Section
subject to: 1. A fie:
concurrence by the V
limited to no more t]
use; 3. Limited reta
property owner and p
shall be allowed for
Mr. Cassidy moved. M
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES
NAYS
Motion carried by a
ZBA-18-SU-91
July 25, 1991
Page 2 of 3
urst and Algonquin Road g which was
from a B-1 to 1-1 noting that I-1
es. Mr. Clements stated that
a prospective client that
binets that would like to have some
ich would include be migor retail,
that Arthpr J. Rogers & Co. realizes
t be total,retail and staff also
nts stated that a P.U.D, must be
ield change by the Village Manager
lements stated that there limited
major impact on traffin. Staff$
rding parking. Mr. Clem(Ints stated
ired for the corporate Uses ,
20% ofri.ce and 30% warehouse use.
10% the total parking needed would
rate Park has 201 spaces and Mr,
ff feels cA,)mfortable with that
2d if therp is a probleT with
staff feels the exis'
limited retail use w:
!d that the specific is
d change review procei
.1• signs should be all,
discussed the petiti,
;ertained a motion to
an amendment to Speci,
2201 to al low limited
Wange by the Village
tge Board;;2. Retailin
10% of the total flog
ig shall be approved i
;rty manager; 4. No ad
:ail uses.
?ratt seconded.
innon, Pratt, Saviano,
isnik
Dne
e of 5-0.
g number of
not greatly
ct could be
Mr. Clements
d.
rs request
.nt the
Use Ordinance
tai use
rager and
,hall be
Lrea of an 1-1
triting by the
Tonal signage
issidy,
2BA-18-S[-91
July 25, 1991
Page n of 3
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
6
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
w
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN "L
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JULY 18, 1991
ZBA-48-SU-91
ROGERS CORPORATE PARK
1840-1894 ELMHURST ROAD
---7 F----� M--17-7
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1-1 Light Industrial
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
FA.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)
Ordinance #4156 to allow limited retail uses in the Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest
comer of Elmhurst Road and Algonquin Road.
In March of 1990, the Rogers Company received approval of a
rezoning from B-3 to 1-1, and a P.U.D. to allow development of the Rogers Corporate
Park. Construction followed shortly thereafter, and at this time the project is completed,
and leasing has been very successful. During initial leasing, several prospective tenants
approached the Rogers Company and inquired about limited retail sales, from a warehouse
or showroom. The 1-1 Light Industrial District prohibits retail sales, so these uses were not
allowed.
As an example, a piano retailer hoped to lease 10,000 sq. ft. in the industrial park as a
warehouse and distribution facility for several retail locations. This company had hoped to
be able to sell pianos from the warehouse on Saturdays and for special promotions. This
limited retailing was not allowed, so the company chose not to use the Corporate Park for
their warehouse and distribution operation.
Also, a prospective tenant is a distributor of kitchen cabinets. This company would like to
sell directly to the public from a showroom and this retailing would be minor and secondary
to the distribution operation.
Seeing that limited retailing would be beneficial to users in the industrial park, the Arthur
Rogers Company requested this amendment to the P.U.D. The Company emphasizes that
any retailing would be accessory to permitted industrial uses, and that it is not their intent
to have a tenant do actual day-to-day retail sales at the park.
Pronesed PXA Atngndment: The applicant suggests that retailing be limited to 15% of
the total floor area of a business, or to a certain number of hours or days. Staff believes
that it is important that the Village be able to review and evaluate retail uses, to measure
their impact on adjoining uses and parking.
From looking at other suburban zoning ordinances, many industrial districts allow limited
retail uses as a Special Use.
Inasmuch as Rogers Corporate Park already exists with a Planned Unit Development, and
considering the types of limited retailing being proposed, a Special Use permit does not
seem appropriate. However, some review of such uses is important.
Staff recommends that limited retailing be allowed in Rogers Corporate Park, subject to:
1. Field change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence by the Village Board.
2. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the total floor area of an I-1 use.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
3. Limited retailing shall be approved in writing by the property owner and property
manager.
Lastly, staff notes that there are 201 parking spaces at the Rogers Corporate Park. The
parking requirement for the P.U.D. was calculated at a rate of 20% office space and 80%
warehouse/assembly space. This formula results in a parking requirement of 165 spaces.
Adding a 10% retail factor to the parking requirement would require 211 spaces. The
Planning staff believes that the 201 existing spaces are sufficient for the proposed limited
retailing.
•U-43 UINAFMOWW. al•
Inspection Services notes that the frequency of retailing in a warehouse/office building
might place the buildings into a mercantile classification. This could require modification
to the existing buildings. The petitioner should be aware that Building Code requirements
could be a factor.
OWN
Staff recommends that P.U.D. Ordinance #4156 be amended to allow limited retailing, as
described above. Such approval should include a condition that no additional signs be
allowed for retail uses.
DMC:hg
VWL/
8/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4156
GOVERNING PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT
1849 - 1894 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
WHEREAS, Arthur J. Rogers and Company (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend Ordinance No. 4156, being
an Ordinance authorizing a Special Use in the nature of a Planned
Unit Development with respect to property commonly known as 1840-
1894 South Elmhurst Road (hereinafter referred to as the Subject
Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 1 in Rogers Corporate Park, being a Subdivision of
part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 23,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to Ordinance No. 4156 to
allow limited retail uses in Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest
corner of Elmhurst Road and Algonquin Road; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for amendment
(designated as ZBA Case No. 48 -SU -91) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of July
1991, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the
Mount Pros ct Herald on the 9th day of July, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and ,
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the
following Ordinance regarding the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE; That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That SECTION THREE of Ordinance No. 4156 entitled "An
Ordinance Granting a Special Use in the Nature of Planned Unit
Development for Property Generally Located at the Southwest corner
of Elmhurst and Algonquin Roads" is hereby amended to permit
limited retail uses as a permitted use exception in the Planned
Unit Development, and to amend SECTION THREE include alphabetically
the following conditions:
B. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the
total floor area of an I-1 use.
C. Limited retailing shall be approved in writing by the
property owner and property manager.
D. No additional signs shall be allowed for retail uses.
E. Limited retailing shall only be allowed with Field
Change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence
by the Village Board.
48 -SU -91
Page 2 of 2
aEgTIDN U_&U,; This ordinance shall be in full'iforce and effect
from and after its passige, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager Wk__
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-49-Z-91, Cook County School Bus, Inc.
LOCATION: 1910 South Busse Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a rezoning application filed by Cook County School Bus, Inc. The applicant is requesting
that the property at 1910 South Busse Road be rezoned from R -X Single -Family Residential
District to R-4 Residential Development District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting, Michael Collins, attorney for the applicant, presented testimony in support of
the request. Mr. Collins explained that the rezoning request was part of an overall
Settlement Agreement between Cook County School Bus, Inc. and the Village of Mount
Prospect. He noted that the property was involuntarily annexed to the Village and given
a R -X zoning designation which is not consistent with zoning of the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that disconnection litigation
is currently pending for several other properties forcibly annexed to the Village in 1987.
Cook County School Bus, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement with the Village to
avoid the pending litigation. The proposed rezoning to R-4 is part of the agreement.
Mr. Clements explained that the R-4 zoning would be consistent with surrounding
properties, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In addition, the property is not suited
to its current R -X zoning designation.
Arthur Holtzman, attorney representing the Village, further explained that the proposed R-
4 zoning is in the best long-term interest of the Village. The current use by the applicant
could continue as a legal non -conforming use.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Some concerns and questions arose
regarding the continued non -conforming status of the existing school bus use under the
proposed R-4 zoning. It was noted that R-4 zoning is compatible with the surrounding
properties and the Comprehensive Plan. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the request to rezone 1910 South Busse Road from R-
X Single -Family Residential to R-4 Residential Development District.
JF:cl
�,.
IXI
M[KT4/O Yla� R+r.R+c�.w a.e�• - �.� —PE1 I E t � l
n
..
-
_
m
a'+_i
r wjLerT D6F�CciIP''T�ION
SITE PL-Ao.i
Foutio4TIC>
,
+ti
j
3 Fi_C)G?R. CLAN
eloe
qe*A
44•Z'
I
F.,S Op* THE RF'.GU_I.,AR. _,4EF',T1NG OF THE
F-IROSPE("17 ZONINC, BOARD OF' APPEAf..,S
7BA CIAS1a No, �9_z_91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
PEJI'ITTOFR:
Cook County School Bus, Inc.
Sj,_'BJF.CT PROPERTY:
1910 South Busse Road
FIUBLICATION DATE:
July 9, 1991
RF.W..-EST:
Rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to
R-4 Residential Development
District.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting to rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to R-4 Residential Development
District.
The petitioner, Michael Collins, attorney representing the
petitioner Cook County School Bus, stated that the subject
property was annexed into the Village and zoned R -X. Mr.
Collins stated that there is multi -family and commercial
properties surrounding the Cook County School Bus property.
Mr. Collins stated that R-4 zoning was suggested to be
consistent with the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this is one of a number of properties that was involuntary
annexed into the Village in 1987. Mr. Clements stated that
the other properties are seeking disconnection in court and
these cases are still pending. Mr. Clements stated that Cook
County School Bus would like to construct a day-care center
for their employees and also a vehicle wash. They were
granted a permit for these projects by the County before the
annexation. The Village and Cook County School Bus have
entered a settlement Agreement as an alternative to the
pending litigation. The requested rezoning to R -A is part of
the Agreement. The proposed R-4 zoning will be consistent
with the surrounding land uses and the comprehensive plan.
ZBA-Z-19-91
July 25, 1991.
Page 2 of 2
Staff recommends apprdx'al of this, request.
Mr. Cassidy stated that the existing school bus use
is non -conforming with regard to the R-4 district.
Mr. Clements stared that this will be existing ,non -conforming'
use noting that staff„didn't want Industrial zoning of the
property- or to amend the R-4 test to allow a bus wash. As a
non -conforming use it"4i.11 be ''phased out.
Mr. Clements then introduced Mr. Arthur Holtzman, attorney
representing the Village of Mount Prospect. qcC
Mr. Cassidy asked why�'the proposed rezoning isAin conformance'
with the present use.
Mr. Holtzman stated that the first significant step to help
settle the dispute is `to grant the rezoning. Mr. Holtzman
stated that many othe" properties have filed suit against the
Village of Mount Prospect. Mr. Holtzman stated that certain
rights have been grant d to Cook County School ,Bus in a
consent decree with Cook County. Rezoning to R-;4 would be a
greater benefit to the Village and the best interest of all
parties.
The Board then genera %1y discussed the p'etition'ers request an
had no objections.
Chairman Basnik then '0ntertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to rezone frgJm R -X Single `amily
Residence to "R-4 Resi, enttal Deve>Yop ent District.
Mr. Pratt moved. Mr.assidy 'seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYESLannon,Pratt, Sav ano, Cassidy,
F3asni,k
NAYS:' None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This case must still lie heard before the ''Village Board.
Michelle Thompson:
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN MC>
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-49-Z-91
APPLICANT: COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC.
ADDRESS: 1910 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X (existing); R4 (proposed)
LOT SIZE: 4.02 Acres
% COVERAGE: N/A
F -A -R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
F- �6�
Page 2
This application was filed requesting a rezoning of the subject property from an R -X Single
]Family District to an R-4 Residential Development District.
Summary of application: Cook County School Bus has requested the rezoning to an R-4
District as part of an agreement designed to help settle pending litigation with the Village.
As background, Cook County School Bus was one of a number of properties along South
Busse Road that was annexed to the Village in 1987. Because the corporate limits of the
Village surrounded these properties, the Village passed appropriate ordinances involuntarily
annexing these properties to the Village. For a variety of reasons, these property owners
Filed complaints in Cook County Circuit Court challenging the involuntary annexation and
seeking disconnection from the Village. This disconnection litigation is now pending in the
Appellate Court of Illinois.
At the same time, Cook, County School Bus has long wanted to construct a day care facility
for their drivers and a vehicle wash for their vehicles. In fact, the Company has a Special
Use approval from Cook County to construct these facilities. Upon annexation to Mount
Prospect in 1987, the property was zoned R -X and the day care facility and vehicle wash
were not permitted with this zoning classification.
In an effort to avoid potentially lengthy and costly litigation, the applicant and Village
negotiated a Settlement Agreement that will remove Cook County School Bus from the
litigation pending in the Appellate Court, and assure it's annexation to the Village. This
Agreement will allow the Company to construct it's day care facility and vehicle wash as
originally approved, if Cook County School Bus requests a rezoning to the R-4 District, and
other items as found in the Settlement Agreement.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Concerning the rezoning, the R-4
classification would be consistent with multi-faffifly zoning north and south of the site, on
the west side of Busse Road. The R-4 zoning would also be consistent with the multi-
family designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Thus, the rezoning is consistent with the
area. Also, the property is not suited for development with the Single Family R -X District.
With this information, the application meets the required standards of the Zoning
Ordinance.
Q-UER 3ILLAGE MEE COMMEND
All Village Departments reviewed the application, and there were no objections or concerns
raised about the R4 zoning.
SEHMARYIRECOMMENDATIO
The staff would recommend approval of the rezoning as the R-4 classification is consistent
with the area, and meets the objectives of the Comprehensive Plari. According to the
Settlement Agreement, Cook County School Bus will be able to construct the vehicle wash
and day care facility, then operate as a legal non -conforming use in the R-4 District. In
addition to the benefit of the proper zoning classification for this property, Cook County
School Bus will withdraw from the disconnect litigation, and dismiss other litigation against
the 'Village.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager wt -
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-49-Z-91, Cook County School Bus, Inc.
LOCATION: 1910 South Busse Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a rezoning application filed by Cook County School Bus, Inc. The applicant is requesting
that the property at 1910 South Busse Road be rezoned from R -X Single -Family Residential
District to R-4 Residential Development District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting, Michael Collins, attorney for the applicant, presented testimony in support of
the request. Mr. Collins explained• that the rezoning request was part of an overall
Settlement Agreement between Cook County School Bus, Inc. and the Village of Mount
Prospect. He noted that the property was involuntarily annexed to the Village and given
a R -X zoning designation which is not consistent with zoning of the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that disconnection litigation
is currently pending for several other properties forcibly annexed to the Village in 1987.
Cook County School Bus, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement with the Village to
avoid the pending litigation. The proposed rezoning to R-4 is part of the agreement.
Mr. Clements explained that the R-4 zoning would be consistent with surrounding
properties, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In addition, the property is not suited
to its current R -X zoning designation.
Arthur Holtzman, attorney representing the Village, further explained that the proposed R-
4 zoning is in the best long-term interest of the Village. The current use by the applicant
could continue as a legal non -conforming use.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Some concerns and questions arose
regarding the continued non -conforming status of the existing school bus use under the
proposed R-4 zoning. It was noted that R-4 zoning is compatible with the surrounding
properties and the Comprehensive Plan. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the request to rezone 1910 South Busse Road from R-
X Single -Family Residential to R-4 Residential Development District.
JF:cl
fit
�. 33
` ` 1
(WI [WR
I I I III
LL- 77- { a
�, au�trT ac�tcRi�rlof..l -.P.�
`•: - 317E
FOUIli d4
49 e;
Ursa - 49-t-1
�.str
iAy
T
2
`IINI_TTS OF' THE REGI.;LAR MEETI%G OF THE
pROSPEC1ZONING F;OAPD OF APPEALS
ZP,.A C,S'-_' NO. 19-Z-91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
PETITIONER:
Cook County School Bus, Inc.
SUBJFCT PROPERTY:
1910 South Busse Road
PUBLICATTON DATE:
July 9, 1991
Rl','Q[.-EST:
Rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to
R-4 Residential Development
District.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting to rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to R-4 Residential Development
District.
The petitioner, Michael Collins, attorney representing the
petitioner Cook County School Bus, stated that the subject
property was annexed into the Village and zoned R -X. Mr.
Collins stated that there is multi -family and commercial
properties surrounding the Cook County School Bus property.
Mr. Collins stated that R-4 zoning was suggested to be
consistent with the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this is one of a number of properties that was involuntary
annexed into the Village in 1987. Mr. Clements stated that
the other properties are seeking disconnection in court and
these cases are still pending. Mr. Clements stated that Cook
County School Bus would like to construct a day-care center
for their employees and also a vehicle wash. They were
granted a permit for these projects by the County before the
annexation. The Village and Cook County School Bus have
entered a settlement Agreement as an alternative to the
pending litigation. The requested rezoning to R -A is part of
the Agreement. The proposed R-4 zoning will be consistent
with the surrounding land uses and the comprehensive plan.
Staff recornmends, app
Mr. Cassidy stated. t
is non-conformin,,Y S,�i
Mr. Clements stated
use noting that staf
pr-operty or to amend
anon-conrornii rig 1,ise i
Mr. Clements then in
representing the Vil
Mr. Cassidy asked wh
with the present use
Mr. Holtzman stated
settle the dispute i
stated that many oth
Village of Mount Pro
rights have been gra
consent decree with
greater benefit to t
parties.
The Board then gener
had no objections.
Chairman Basnik then
petitioners request
Residence to R-4 Res
Mir. Pratt moved. Mr.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYEE
NA'
Motion carried by a
This case must stil
ZBA-Z-4q-91
July 25, 1991,
Page 2 of 2
,al of this request.
the existing school bus use
regard to the R-4 district.
Lt this will be existing non -conforming!
[idn't want Industrial zoning of the
ue R-4 text to aLlow a bus wash. As a
as ll
be phased out.
)duced Mr. Arthur Holtzman, attorney
,e of Mount Prospect. #iCc
;he proposed rezoning is A in conformance
Lt the first significant step to help
,o grant the rezoning. Mr. Holtzman
properties have filed suit against the
?ct. Mr. Holtzman stated that certain
yd to Cook County School Bus in a
)k County, Rezoning to R-4 would be a
Village and the best interest of all
1.y discussed the petitioners request an
itertained a motion to grant the
rezone from R -X Single Family
=ntial Development District.
issidy seconded.
Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Basnik
Mone
to of 5-0.
e heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
ffel
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ffqc>
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JULY 18, 1991
ZBA-49-Z-91
COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC.
1910 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X (e7dsting); R4 (proposed)
LOT SIZE: 4.02 Acres
% COVERAGE: N/A
F -A -R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
This application was filed requesting a rezoning of the subject property from an R -X Single
Family District to an R-4 Residential Development District.
MONMOVOMMUO•d XON141
Summary of application: Cook County School Bus has requested the rezoning to an R-4
District as part of an agreement designed to help settle pending litigation with the Village.
As background, Cook County School Bus was one of a number of properties along South
Busse Road that was annexed to the Village in 1987. Because the corporate limits of the
Village surrounded these properties, the Village passed appropriate ordinances involuntarily
annexing these properties to the Village. For a variety of reasons, these property owners
filed complaints in Cook County Circuit Court challenging the involuntary annexation and
seeking disconnection from the Village. This disconnection litigation is now pending in the
Appellate Court of Illinois.
At the same time, Cook County School Bus has long wanted to construct a day care facility
for their drivers and a vehicle wash for their vehicles. In fact, the Company has a Special
Use approval from Cook County to construct these facilities. Upon annexation to Mount
Prospect in 1987, the property was zoned R -X and the day care facility and vehicle wash
were not permitted with this zoning classification.
In an effort to avoid potentially lengthy and costly litigation, the applicant and Village
negotiated a Settlement Agreement that will remove Cook County School Bus from the
litigation pending in the Appellate Court, and assure it's annexation to the Village. This
Agreement will allow the Company to construct it's day care facility and vehicle wash as
originally approved, if Cook County School Bus requests a rezoning to the R-4 District, and
other items as found in the Settlement Agreement.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Concerning the rezoning, the R-4
classification would be consistent with multi-faffifly zoning north and south of the site, on
the west side of Busse Road. The R-4 zoning would also be consistent with the multi-
family designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Thus, the rezoning is consistent with the
area. Also, the property is not suited for development with the Single Family R -X District.
With this information, the application meets the required standards of the Zoning
Ordinance.
THER VILLAGE STAIT COMMENES
All Village Departments reviewed the application, and there were no objections or concerns
raised about the R-4 zoning.
SUMMARYIRECOMMENDATION
'The staff would recommend approval of the rezoning as the R-4 classification is consistent
With the area, and meets, the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. According to the
Settlement Agreement, Cook County School Bus will be able to construct the vehicle wash
and day care facility, then operate as a legal non -conforming use in the R-4 District. In
addition to the benefit of the proper zoning classification for this property, Cook County
School Bus will withdraw from the disconnect litigation, and dismiss other litigation against
the Village.
VWL/
08/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R -X TO R-4 (RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT) DISTRICT
AS IT PERTAINS TO 1910 SOUTH BU9jSE ROAD
WHEREAS, Cook County School Bus, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner), has filed an application to rezone the property
commonly known as 1910 South Busse Road (hereinafter referred to
as Subject Property), legally described as follows:
The North 5 acres of the South 25 acres (except the West 210.0
feet thereof and except the East 50.0 feet thereof) of the
Southeast quarter of the Northeast quarter of Section 22,
Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from R -X (Single Family Residence) to R-4 (Residential Development)
District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 49-Z-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
July, 1991 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been
published in the Mount Prgsgect Herald on the 9th day of July,
1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA
49-Z-91 and have determined that the best interests of the Village
of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
BECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to
an R-4 (Residential Development) District.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
49-Z-91
Page 2 of 2
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gverald L. Farley
Village President
'Earol A. -Fields
Village Clerk
Vi I I age of o u n t Pros p e c t
Mourit' Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Y J I
9 1
0 i c., a i Y, kJ ..P( (.`r,- i i,ai E
"I 'a t A
>uE, 0 C.", S u I r,
i-:
t, z -
I "v
v,
Ca U CA r i';
Uu i j J S h 'n U iiick y f: f
E, a 3"J J, i' tl
�N t� d
w Z' s
zi n 1,'-4 i
I 'E: IF
-it
L
N' t I U f cc, 1) V-0", t 11 T
C' "n
C, ij I'n )S
e p sa r i nc L -i n 9 w i aqe Manaqpr
F
village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
10 , ;,;ar es ber.cic, Lirec-.L,)t o-,
rrom : Cou "e;2j'r1:-, ('IVGi'dirar-c.r 77`7
Date: August 14, 1 91
Re : Medical Was -"e 01SPc$a - I 01-01dance .
A-,tE:r- i-ltvlew-nq the recent �1) LCoz -z't�te 0-1 1 ; r"=- �l U � --- 7 Z'.:
i',E01, cat 14aSTe , , 01 Scuss", oil 6 w I tri trj& 4V.MIC arid -S'r" A NC, a -, s w'u S i 0 ri S
witi-i o -f rG,ais of the 1EFA, and a
tr-iiht Qe"el")Pecl tile sz'aze D" !I L: -,at ti -,e dell -,
elloen-k--: cf tne cr(:j-j r, a I -11--e a 1' 17 c6a:'I'eo Le CLi*'S -1-z
SiaLe ('e9U;aL101-1S. A I ter Ord l e z"G . Ge
ConS-ISLarlu vil-Llh the State 0-, 1 1 vycu ic F-"(G,o any "S
for Lrtose that imay be effected.
T i te State U , i i r e 9 u ', at -i n9 M, ed 1 C a 1 vi a s 'le {"las -- h a il G e d Ji a 1, - G: )`. '
-s-ince -it vqaS iaz-z reviewed by the ;INMIC a: -,a S'v4A;4'l:. 1 was lnto!-,me--
by ti -,c- triaL the bill dic not go through the r1ormal r,--u-'e, sc
We were ncL moue aware Of the changes. After- O)s--ussing the changes
W1 til 7 i'le -
,:-,a�` of the t' -.e state rj-.'' lf ,-lot S I C 17 -, cath
�'
crianyeo should rriee-:, The purposes o-1 SWANC. 1 been -infor-lm
L I . a t t a -, e s t E Sate L i --1 Ge sle c, Ly L, -,E G'� , t-= I- c
Ll'e e V" 6 0, ZlEotemoer . The state bi I i contains no p r eemp z. i c: -j
G i auses . sc Al -see tic reason to r-osn this--ilrough.
DK.
cc: Dave 1:epson, Acting Vii -age manager
F; 1 e
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
'a e
"','Osor)
Act I �101 I I 1,11'11j�:D�
r onme,ri ta
'c' c r i i.Z, C)
LJ a
1
1
uc:
""i C1 ;ort' -
me J C :-i
S Sv E
1� 0�
"D
1
'J :A
t
T:
e
J
'a e
S I -J
0
S Sv E
1� 0�
t
T:
e
J
vWWW M
purposes. The major differences are listed Wow.
Th,! i , a q yE, c f 1,1 r r L I r r, P r o s p e c t a v o i n A n v L
w4u " es m, Awn pr" owca , or Wentwus wwnLe
rosimVI` a N
UWWAa", Wid C"weIrLS lu :a heoo �n Pic vy"un, wr
—ar, 7-1
a iI r r yqo i rev mdr , W Zn 0, 6,"; T i o
v"c slate w j nan nvEk e,pwcco L. L.Y
mus—ni wasw may naL a wupol;eu A !H K Wrlha!
na-We ;"teaM,
w,ransjur Let a, a nr qu aa e yenwrnA,v
-vnz 60 ,
an 5007 6, 0 U r7 MIS U WMV 1 -M . if;, r 1
�ne ssainsoring 07 a qsusenwa hazardzus wasne
7-
cci,ecLicn
nesw g a I a0. 7ne an -r 3,-
;E ---( v. -c,
_..m...n za�
vionsoces 0:6 MWA tcr a s"n ar commac, my )E
CW Awrorec
zn_ "— .GALL chaos, crwavica, ,, 1 s 6roov
jnscsa 17
Palo's to avvhI WE Oceazes! ..So. WLA
-5,
",uneoc & nwaroos wastes ooes wz
nastw-
wriek ouiieczeo musL ce orzpa—y iceaoii-iew,
saz a;sa.
ano !abe so or iur to transoortaL7on, Tow is not
cossin,e n a
cragram.
Mount Prospect Pubp
lic Works Deartment
If INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 77' CTIM um
TO: ACTING VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: SOLID WASTE COORDINATOR
DATE: AUGUST 14, 1991
RE: HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE COLLECTIONS
Attached please find documentation pertaining to the status of Mount
Prospect's application for siting of an Illinois Environmental
Protection Agency (IEPA) sponsored Household Hazardous Waste Collection
Day. As the July 23, 1991 memo indicates Mount Prospect was not
selected but remains on the list for future sitings. (Attachment 1)
It is my understanding the Village Manager is going to contact our
state representatives, as suggested by the IEPA, requesting letters of
support.
I have also included information on the cost of collection programs as
well as the names of Contractors providing this service. (Attachments 2
& 3) However, as these documents reflect 1990 pricing I obtained the
following data from the May 1991 hazardous collection day held in Des
Plaines.
.Sponsor - IEPA
.Contractor - Clean Harbors
.Cost - $100,000.00
.Participants - 744 (85% of participants were Des Plaines residents)
.Materials Collected:
30 cubic yards of latex paint
120 drums of other materials
No cost breakdown was available, ie, cost for collection and disposal
of paint versus other substances.
If the Village was to pursue a collection day independent from IEPA
sponsorhip it is possible to contain the cost of collection and
disposal by limiting the types and quantity of materials collected.
Please be advised our current solid waste contractor ARC Disposal does
not provide any type of service for the collection of hazardous or
medical waste.
If you would like additional information or costs,
know.
please let me
VILLAGE n
Fli,,'ANCE
151991
RECEIVED
urel,
Attachment 1
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: SOLID WASTE C
DATE --_,-attY 23, 1991
HAZARDOUS COLLECTION DAY
On Ma -k -4 -6f --this year I met with Mr. Mike Chandler of the Illinois
Environmental Protection Agency, (IEPA) Land Pollution Division. our
discussion focused on Mount Prospect's application for the IEPA
sponsored Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day. At that time Mr.
Chandler suggested I call him at his Springfield office and he would
re-evaluate our application.
When I contacted Mr. Chandler on May 8 he indicated our application
looked fine but did suggest we submit a letter of support from our Fire
and Police Departments to enhance our chances for selection. A letter
of support was requested from both Departments and the letter received
from the Fire Department was submitted to Mr. Chandler. Since that
time I have kept in contact with Mr. Chandler to check the status of
our application. He did indicate in one of our conversations that even
though he may make recommendations he does not make the final
selection.
As you can see from the attached letter Mount Prospect was not
selected, again, for the IEPA sponsored collection. I have already
contacted Mr. Dave Walters requesting a more detailed explanation for
the rejection but his response was pretty evasive. The only further
suggestion he could make was that the Village have a state
representative write a letter of support and direct it to his
administrator. I will follow through with his suggestion by contacting
a local representative and request the letter of support.
Although my conversation with Mr. Chandler in May seemed to indicate
Mount Prospect had a good chance at being a 1992 selection site I am
not totally surprised by the rejection. With the limited funds
available the IEPA tends to sponsor sites according to region and Des
Plaines had a collection last spring. There are no selection sites for
1992 in this area.
I did express my concern to Mr. Walters and encouraged his organization
to reconsider Mount Prospect should there be any sites added to the
1992 program. our application will also be considered for sponsorship
when the IEPA selects the 1993 sites.
In the interim, the Public Works Department will continue to assist
residents seeking proper disposal methods for their hazardous materials.
Should you have any questions, please contact me.
C., Director of Public Works
Mount Prospect Solid Waste Commission
.
D0nnis Environmental Protection Agency ' P.O.Box xy27u snnumnao./L 6279*a27*
217/785-8604
July ll, 1991
Nt. Prospect Public Works Department
1700 W. Central Road
Mt' Prospect, IL 60066
Dear Sir:
The Illinois EPA has selected the locations for the fall l�g1 and spring
1992 Household Hazardous Waste Collection Days. I um xnr~to inform
you that your application was not chosen at this time, The |RA received
over sixty applications which reflects the expanding level' of interest
and community support for these projects. This year we have expanded
the program to include 15 communities.
After the collection dates have been finalized with the selected
applicants, we will release the names and locations of the communities
chosen, { thank you for your interest and support and we will keep
your application for consideration in any further round of selections
You do not have to re -apply. `
Again, thank you for your time and interest.
Sin
David Walters, Manager
Solid Waste Reduction Unit
Solid Waste Management Section
Division of Land Pollution C6htro?
DA:jsm:9/9-2
"''~^~~ ~~ »'.~,-~ n~"°,
Mount Prospect Public Works Department Attachment
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= aTy LSA
TO: DIRECTOR PUBLIC WORKS
FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE
DATE: JANUARY 22, 1991
RE: HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS WASTE SEMINAR
The following is a brief synopsis of the one day seminar I attended on
Household Hazardous Waste, January 18, 1991, sponsored by the North
Shore Ecology Center.
As the general public becomes more informed and concerned with the
environment issues there is increasing pressure on local and state
governments to provide acceptable and safe disposable methods for
materials considered hazardous/toxic. Although the seminar did not
provide a readily available solution it did identify options
communities could pursue in addressing this 'issue.
1) Household Hazardous Waste Collection Day - Residents are
allowed to bring hazardous/toxic materials to a designated site
during the one day program. However, this does not
appear to be a realistic option unless the collection day is
sponsored by an agency providing both the funds and staff.
Even under healthy fiscal conditions this costly project makes
local funding prohibitive. According to data from IEPA costs are
in the range of $50,000 to $200,000 depending on number of
participants and materials collected.
The liability associated with this type of collection necessitates
professional expertise acquired through outside contract.
The Illinois EPA does sponsor community collection programs, however,
selected sites seem -to be based on geographics rather than need. We
have submitted an application but so far have not been chosen. Park
Ridge was a collection site in the fall of 1990. Although our
application is still active I intend to follow-up with a letter urging
the IEPA to select Mt. Prosect as a collection site.
The IEPA provides all funding and contracts with SET, Inc. a
professional organization with the facilities and expertise to conduct
the household hazardous materials.
In addition to the one-shot collection sites the IEPA is starting to
research the need for permanent collection facilities throughout the
state. However, as it appears a permanent collection site(s) will not
be available in the near future and the Village stands only o "remote"
chance at being selected as a collection site, community education
appears to be the only immediate channel we have to address the
household hazardous waste issue.
2> ccmnm^uitx Education - aItbouyb never an easy task efforts to
educate the community are now more challenging because residents
want to hear "environmentally safe" answers. For instance, latex
paint can be safely disposed of in a landfill if allowed to
solidify and properly contained. However, this is of times
unacceptable to the "environmentally conscious" resident. They
would rather bold on to the material then put it in the landfill.
The recommendation continually echoed at the seminar though was to
encourage residents to use o» the material for its intended purpose.
If the owner can't use it suggest the material be donated to a
neighbor, housing agency or a local drama department.
A paint exchange program was also suggested but again this should be
done in a controlled environment by qualified staff.
(Paint was mentioned frequently because this is a large volume material
at collection programs. And o�thougb the material is relatively easy
to dispose before being taken to a collection site, disposal costs soar
if the contractor has to dispose of it, ie, boodIiug and
traoseortatioo.>
I did receive a great deal of written material at the seminar and would
suggest it be appropriately compiled as a reference to office staff
responding to resident's soeoti000' It may also be beneficial to have
information published in the Village Newsletter; the first being an
article urging residents to become knowledgable consumers; read the
label and limit use of products containing hazardous/toxic mateziala'
It appears the state of Minnesota is light years ahead of Illinois in
developing hazardous waste collection sites/programs. Two of the
speakers were from or affiliated with the Minnesota Department of
Pollution cpotrol' Again, at this point though, the only information we
can utilize from their presentations focus on community education.
obviously, there is no magical answer to this critical iaooe. From my
perspective though, the state moot be more aggressive in development
and implementation of permanent collection aiteo' If collection
facilities were established z suspect local governments could play a
more active role in a household hazardous waste program.
o/ Deputy Director Public nvrba
Attachment 3
HOUSEHOLD HAZARDOUS MATERIAL
COMPANIES AVAILABLE FOR HIRE
FIW Inc.
Hazard Waste Management
6125 North Pecatonica Road
P.O. Box 479
Pecatonica, IL 61063-0479
Phone# 706-9099
ATTN: Mike Hunter
Cost
By hour & by unit
Weekends- $65 per hour per person, usually 2 or 3 men out there.
Weekdays- $50 per hour per person, 11
Drums- $37 + transportation Disposal of paints- latex
$165
flamable or oil base $390
Disposal of pesticides- $450
Easier to target specifically for pesticides, may be cheaper.
Otherwise you pay for pesticide bins, when 80% of drop off may
be for paints. May then end up using all of funds for just a
giant disposal.
Materials Accepted
Paints, pesticides, car waxes, etc.
Don't take- dioxin related chemicals -24T or 245TP
Set Contractors
450 Sumac Road
Wheeling, IL 60090
Phone # 537-9221
ATTN: Jim Miller
Illinois EPA currently uses this company for their contracts.
Wants to set up an appointment to discuss packages you can pur-
chase and so forth.
Cost
$40-55 per hour per person depending on whether there is a
project supervisor or technician out there.
Drums -
Disposal of paints- $300-$500 depending on oil or latex.
Price includes drum and transporation.
Disposal Of Pesticides- price ranges from $600-$800
Material Accepted
Paints, pesticides, motor oils.
Don't take- explosives or dioxin chemicals
Best
P.O. Box 576
Schannahon, IL 60410
Phone # 1-815-725-1554
ATTN: Mark Schief
Costs
$45-60 depending on lab technicians
Drums- $25
Packing material for drums- $4-$5 per bag
Pesticides- $3 per pound of wastes plus transportation
depending on where it goes. Can range up to $1000.
Says we should look at the costs from Illinois EPA household
clean up, so we can get a general idea of how much it is going
to cost. Then we can figure out if we can afford it.
Told us he will not send any information out unless we send them
a bid because they don't like to do all the work when the villag-
es can't afford to do this.
Chemical waste Management, Inc.
3001 Butterfield Road
Oak Brook, IL 60521
Phone # 369-9543
Will call back ATTN: Eric Laut
Ohio Materials
1334 Enterprise Drive
Romeo Ville, IL 60441
Phone # 759-9493
Will call back ATTN: Todd Kenningp
HAZMAT.DAY
/caf
7/31/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 ENTITLED "HEALTH REGULATIONS"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, is
a home rule unit of government, pursuant to the provisions of the
Constitution of the State of Illinois of 1970, and as such home
rule unit is empowered to enact such legislation pertaining to its
local government affairs as is deemed necessary in the best
interest of the Village; and
WHEREAS, the village of Mount Prospect is interested in protecting
the environment through prevention of the disposal of infectious
medical wastes with the municipal waste stream; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is committed to the
protection of its citizens, and the general public, from infectious
medical wastes and medical instruments that pose a health risk when
improperly disposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Chapter 19 entitled "Health Regulations" of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further
amended by creating Article VII entitled "Medical Waste
Regulations"; so that hereinafter said Chapter 19 shall include the
following:
If Article VII
MEDICAL WASTE REGULATIONS
SECTION:
19.701. Regulation of Infectious Medical Wastes
19.702. Definitions
19.703. Written Protocol
19.704. Storage Before Treatment
19.705. Storage Times
19.706. Packaging of Infectious Medical Waste
19.707. Final Disposal
19.708. Packaging and Disposal of Resident Generated Medical
Waste Sharps
19.709. Exemptions
19.710. Penalties
Section 19.701. Regulation of Infectious Medical Wastes.
The handling of infectious medical wastes shall
be regulated in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
Section 19.702. Definitions. Infectious medical waste shall mean
waste that is capable of transmitting a
communicable disease.
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE:
An infectious agent or its toxic products which is transmitted
directly or indirectly to a well person from an infected
person, animal, or arthropod, or through the agency of an
intermediate host, vector, or the inanimate environment.
Chapter 19
Page 2 of 4
EFFECTIVE TREATMENT:
Treatment that reduces pathogenic qualities of the waste to
a point where it is safe to handle by non -classified
personnel. To be effective, the treatment must be designed
for the waste in question and be carried out in a manner
acceptable to the authorized enforcing agent for the Village.
the treatment may include, but is not limited to, the
following:
1. Incineration
2. Steam sterilization (autoclaving)
3. Chemical disinfection
4. Thermal inactivation
5. Irradiation
III&NINW,
For the purpose of this Article, the Health Officer shall mean
the Environmental Health Coordinator of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
INFECTIOUS MEDICAL WASTE:
Infectious -medical waste shall include, but is not limited to,
the following:
1. Pathological wastes (human tissues, blood, excreta, and
secretions)
2. Cultures
3. Used sharps
4. Infectious agent stock and associated biologicals
5. Human blood and blood products
6. Human body parts and contaminated disposable bedding,
bandages and dressings
7. Contaminated laboratory wastes
8. Wastes from surgery and autopsy
9. Contaminated animal carcasses, body parts, and bedding
Examples of establishments generating infectious medical waste
include, but: are not limited to the following:
1. Hospitals
2. Doctor's and dentist's offices
3. Medical. and diagnostic laboratories
4. Blood banks and plasma centers
5. Ambulatory surgical facilities
6. Long-term health care facilities
7. Research or analytical laboratories
8. Pharmaceutical facilities
9. Veterinary offices and hospitals
10. Clinics
11. Mortuaries
12. Animal quarantine facilities
LIQUID INFECTIOUS MEDICAL WASTE:
Liquid waste that is included with solid infectious medical
waste for treatment and disposal. It does not include urine,
wash water, and other liquids most properly disposed of via
the sanitary sewer.
SECURED AREA:
An area which is accessible only to classified personnel. If
indoors, the area must not be accessible to the general
Chapter 19
Page 3 of
public. If outdoors, the area must be locked. Secure areas
must be marked with the universal biohazard symbol at least
six inches (611) in height.
61 , P41 14
Hypodermic and suture needles, syringes, scalpel blades,
pipettes, lancets, guidewires, or other objects that could cut
or penetrate the skin but not limited to the above.
Section 19.703. Written Protocol. A written protocol for
infectious medical waste treatment and disposal,
and receipts documenting the proper removal or disposal of
infectious medical wastes, must be maintained on the premises and
available for inspection by the authorized enforcing agent for the
Village. The protocol must include storage before treatment,
methods of treatment, quality assurance checks per specifications
of the manufacturer of the equipment used to treat the infectious
medical waste, and final disposal methods. Receipts documenting
the proper removal and/or disposal of infectious medical wastes
must be maintained for the most recent twelve (12) month period.
Receipts shall be from a licensed medical waste hauler, or sanitary
landfill, incinerator, or other facility approved for the disposal
of infectious medical waste.
Section 19.704. Storage Before Treatment. Infectious medical
waste being stored prior to treatment, or prior
to the collection for subsequent treatment, shall be kept in a
secure area. Used sharps shall be placed in puncture -resistant
containers. Liquid infectious waste shall be stored in leak -proof
containers. Each infectious waste container in the storage area
shall be individually marked with the universal biohazard symbol.
Section 19.705. Storage Times. Storage times for infectious
medical waste that can putrefy and generate
noxious odors shall be no longer than seven (7) days above 15
degrees fahrenheit or thirty (30) days below 15 degrees fahrenheit.
Storage times for other infectious medical wastes shall be kept as
short as possible, but not to exceed thirty (30) days.
Section 19.706. Packaging of infectious Medical Waste. Packaging
of Infectious Medical Waste shall be in the
following manner:
1. If liquid, in a leak -proof container before being bagged,
boxed, or drummed.
2. If sharps, in a puncture -resistant container which is
non-openable except by use of tools, before being bagged,
box or drummed.
3. All waste shall be placed in sealed, tear -resistant
plastic bags identified by the universal biohazard
symbol. The bags shall be thick enough to contain any
spilled liquid infectious waste.
4. All waste shall be in a second properly identified bag,
box, or drum, if the treatment process destroyed the
biohazard marking or reduced the structural integrity of
the original bag.
Section 19.707. Final Disposal. Final disposal of infectious
medical waste must be in a United States
Environmental Protection Agency approved sanitary landfill or
incinerator approved for infectious or medical hazardous wastes.
Chapter 19
Page 4 of
Section 19.708. Packaging and Disposal of Resident Generated
medical Waste Sharps. Medical waste sharps
generated by private residents shall be packaged in a puncture
proof container prior to disposal. Disposal shall be in a method
that is approved by the Health officer of the Village.
Section 19-709. Exemptions. Exemptions from the requirements of
this Article may be granted in writing by the
Health officer if sufficient evidence indicates that such
exemptions would not cause a risk to public health.
Section 19.710. Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation found
guilty of violating any provisions of the Article
shall be fined no less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) nor more
than five hundred dollars ($500-00) for each offense. A separate
offense shall be deemed to have been committed for each day a
violation occurs or continues. 11
aE9IIQN---M: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict with this ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed.
aEgjjgNTjJUE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
BH/CAF/VWL
8/13/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Article I entitled "Purpose and Definitions" of
Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by adding in proper alphabetical sequence
the following definitions:
DISTRIBUTOR:
Any person, firm or corporation responsible for
placing and maintaining a newspaper vending
machine in a public right-of-way.
NEWSPAPER
Any self-service or coin-operated box,
VENDING
container, storage unit or other dispenser
MACHINE:
installed, used, or maintained for the display
and sale of newspapers or other news
periodicals.
PARKWAY:
That part of the public street right-of-way
occupied by the street pavement and located
between the back of the curb and the sidewalk,
or the right-of-way line if no sidewalk exists,
as well as the raised dividing strip of a
roadway. Parkway shall also include any area
within a roadway which is not open to vehicular
travel.
ROADWAY:
That portion of a street improved, designed,
or ordinarily used for vehicular travel.
SIDEWALK:
Any surface provided primarily for the use of
pedestrians.
STREET:
All that area dedicated to public use for
public street purposes and shall include, but
not be limited to, roadways, parkways, alleys
and sidewalks. 11
SECTION TWO: That Chapter 11 entitled "Merchants, Businesses,
Occupations and Amusements" of the village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by establishing Article
XXXVIII entitled "Newspaper Vending Machines"; so that hereinafter
Article XXXVIII of Chapter 11 shall be and read as follows:
ARTICLE XXXVIII
NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES
;9 �451# X
11.3801. License Required
11.3802. Application for License
11.3803. Standards for Maintenance
11.3804. Location and Placement of
11.3805. Violations
11.3806. Placement of Newspaper
Building Premises
11.3807. Enforcement officer
11.3808. Abandonment
11.3809. Penalties
11.3810. Severability
and Installation
Newspaper Vending machines
Vending Machines on Public
Newspaper vending Machines
Page 2 of 5
Sec. 11.3801. License Required. It shall be unlawful for any
person, firm or corporation to erect,place, maintain
or operate, on any public street or sidewalk, or in any other
public way or place, in the Village of Mount Prospect, any
newspaper vending machine without first having obtained a permit
from the Village of Mount Prospect, which permit shall specify the
exact location of such machine or machines. One permit may be
issued to include any number of newspaper vending machines and
shall be signed by the applicant..
Sec. 11.3802. Application for License. Application for a
newspaper vending machine permit shall be made to
the village Clerk on forms provided by the Village Clerk. The
application for permit shall contain the following:
A. The name and address of the person, firm or corporation to be
in immediate charge of each newspaper vending machine.
B. The location or locations at which it is proposed to locate
each newspaper vending machine.
C. The applicant shall provide a signed statement that the
permittee agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Village
of Mount Prospect, its officers, directors and employees and
agents against any loss or liability for damage, including
expenses and costs for bodily or personal injury and for
property damage sustained by any person as a result of the
installation, use or maintenance of a newspaper vending
machine(s) within the Village.
D. A Certificate of Insurance, issued by an insurance company
authorized to do business in the State of Illinois, providing
coverage to the Village of Mount Prospect, its officers,
directors, employees and agents in an amount of one million
dollars ($1,000,000.00) for any property damage or personal
injury that may be caused by the newspaper vending machine(s)
being located within the designated location. Said
Certificate of Insurance shall be maintained in full force
throughout the life of the permit. If at any time the policy
shall not be in full force, the permit shall become null and
void.
A permit may be issued for the installation of newspaper vending
machines without prior inspection of the location of the newspaper
vending machine and the installation, use or maintenance shall be
conditioned solely upon observance of the provisions of this
Article.
Sec. 11.3803. Standards for Maintenance and Installation. Any
newspaper vending machine which in whole or in part
rests upon, in or over any public sidewalk or parkway, shall comply
with the following standards:
A. No writing or advertising may be displayed on any newspaper
vending machine other than the name and price of the
newspaper, instructions for its use, and information to report
a malfunction of the machine.
B. Each newspaper vending machine shall have affixed to it a
notice setting forth the name and address of the distributor
and a working telephone number to call during normal business
hours to report a malfunction of the coin -return mechanism.
Such notice shall not exceed one square foot in size and shall
be located so as to be seen by anyone using the newspaper
vending machine.
Newspaper Vending Machines
Page 3 of 5
C. The newspaper vending machine may only be located on a solid
surface such as concrete or asphalt and the solid surface must
extend at least three feet (31) in front of the machine.
D. Each newspaper vending machine shall be maintained in a neat
and clean condition and in good repair at all times.
Sec. 11.3804. Location and Placement of Newspaper Vending
Machines. Any newspaper vending machine which rests
in whole or in part upon, or on any portion of a
public right-of-way or which projects onto, into or over any part
of a public right-of-way, shall be located in accordance with the
following provisions:
A. No newspaper vending machine shall be used or maintained which
projects onto, into or over any part of the roadway of any
public street, or which rests, wholly or in part upon, along
or over any portion of the roadway of any public street.
B. No newspaper vending machine shall be permitted to rest upon,
in or over any public sidewalk or parkway under the following
conditions:
-1. When such site or location is used for ground level or
underground public utility purposes or public
transportation purposes;
2. When such newspaper vending machine unreasonably
interferes with or impedes the flow of pedestrian or
vehicular traffic including any legally parked or stopped
vehicle, the ingress into or egress from any residence
or place of business, or the use of poles, posts, traffic
signs or signals, hydrants, mailboxes or other public use
objects permitted at or near the location.
C. No newspaper vending machine shall be bolted or otherwise
attached to any fixture located in the public right-of-way,
except to other newspaper vending machines. Chains shall not
be permitted as a method of attaching newspaper vending
machines together.
D. No newspaper vending machine shall be placed, installed, used
or maintained within three feet (31) of any of the following:
1. Any marked crosswalk;
2. Any fire hydrant, fire call box, police call box or other
emergency facility;
3. Any driveway;
4. Any government area other than a parkway improved with
lawn, flowers, shrubs, trees or other landscaping.
E. No newspaper vending machine shall be located at the
intersection of or along the parkway of any street than does
not permit parking.
Newspaper Vending Machines
Page 4 of 5
Sec. 11.3805. Violations.
A. Upon the determination of the Village Manager, or his
designated agent, that a newspaper vending machine has been
installed, used or maintained in violation of the provisions
of this Article, an order to correct the offending condition
shall be issued to the permittee or the distributor of the
newspaper vending machine. Such order may be telephone or
telefaxed to the distributor and confirmed by mailing a copy
of the order by regular mail. The order shall specifically
describe the offending condition. Failure to correct the
offending condition within three (3) days (excluding
Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays) after the mailing date
of the order shall result in the offending newspaper vending
machine being summarily removed and process as unclaimed
property by the Village.
B. Any newspaper vending machine, the owner or distributor of
which is not properly licensed un the provisions of this
Article shall be immediately removed and processed as
unclaimed property.
C. if a newspaper vending machine is in such a condition as to
create a danger to public safety, the Village Manager or his
designated agent' shall have the authority to immediately
remove or cause the removal of such newspaper vending machine.
D. The cost of the removal, including the use of personnel and/or
equipment, shall be charged to and recovered from the
distributor or from the person for whom the machine has been
or is being installed.
Sec. 11..3806. Placement of Newspaper Vending Machines on Public
Building Premises. Newspaper vending machines
licenses may be denied for placement on the
premises, inside or outside, of an building owned or leased by the
local, County State or Federal government when, in the judgment of
the appropriate governmental authority, the machine or machines
will interfere with any of the following:
A. The public safety;
B. The ability of the user to carry out primary activities of the
building;
C. The aesthetic or design continuity or scheme of the building
or its premises.
Sec. 11.3807. Enforcement Officer. The village Manager or his
designated agent shall be deemed the Enforcement
officer for the purposes of this Article.
Sec. 11.3808. Abandonment- In the event a newspaper vending
machine remains empty for a period of fourteen (14)
continuous days, the same shall be deemed abandoned and in
violation of this Article and may be treated in the manner as
provided in Section 11.3808** of this Article.
Sec. 11.3809. Penalty. In addition to any other remedies
available to the Village of Mount Prospect, any
person, firm or corporation found guilty of violating any provision
of this Article shall be subject to a fine of not less than one
Hundred Dollars ($100.00) nor more than one Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00). Each day the violation continues shall constitute a
separate offense.
Newspaper Vending Machines
Page 5 of 5
Sec. 11.3810. Severability. If any Section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Article is for any reason
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court
of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Article.
SECTION THREE: That all Ordinances or parts of Ordinances' in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and, after its passage, 'approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1 1991.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM nn ary USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 15, 1991
SUBJECT: Phase I Storm Sewer Improvements
Construction Contract
Award Recommendation
Attached is RJN Environmental's bid tabulation for the subject
project. They recommend award to the lowest bidder, Szabo Pav-
ing & Construction Co., Inc., in the amount of $646,380.75. 1
concur with their recommendation.,
A4tt6-
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
RJNPHSIA.WRD/FILES/SEWERS
RJN ENVIRONMLr4TAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
wit CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August 15, 1991
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Subject: Village of Mount Prospect
Phase I Storm Sewer Improvements
Construction Contract
Award Recommendation
Dear Mr. Weeks:
Enclosed please find the Bid Tabulation for eleven Bid Proposals
that were received for the subject project on August 13, 1991.
The lowest Base Bid was submitted by Szabo Paving & Construction
Co., Inc. for $646,380.75. The Bid Proposals ranged from
$646,380.75 to $858,152.95. The Engineers' opinion of Probable
Construction Cost was $747,910.50, which includes a 5%
contingency.
The Bid Proposal submitted by Szabo Paving & Construction Co.,
Inc. has been reviewed and is determined to be responsive to the
bidding conditions. RJN Environmental has checked references for
Szabo Paving & Construction Co., Inc. Based on the check of
references, Szabo Paving & Construction Co., Inc. has the ability
and resources necessary to perform the work.
In summary, RJN Environmental recommends that the Village of
Mount Prospect award the Phase I Storm Sewer Improvements project
to Szabo Paving & Construction Co., Inc. for $646,380.75.
Enclosed please find a copy of the Bid Tabulation for your use.
Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
0,,� �. ga-A&I66
Randall L. Patchett, P.E.
Project Manager
RLP/oev/470
Enclosures
202 W. FRONT STREET
WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60187
(708) 682-4777
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPCT
PHASE I 'SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
BID TABULTATION
ENGINEERS' OPINION
OF PROBABLE
S2ABO PAVING 6
NATIONAL
SEWER 6
LEAGUE
SEWER
DIPAGLO
COMPANY
KOVILIC CONSTRUCTION
LENNY HUFFMAN
CONSTRUCTION
COST
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
WATER,
INC.
CONSTRUCTION
CO.,
INC.
EXCAVATING,
INC,
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
No. DESCRIPTION
UNIT QUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
1 TRAFFIC CONTROL $ PROTECTION
LS
.
5,000.00
$5,000
7,500,00
$7,500.00
10,500.00
$10,500.00
5,000.00
$5,000
8,432.00
18,432
4,000.00
$4,000
63,400,00
$53,400
STORM SEWER, 66' NCP
LF
57
235.00
$13,395
191.00
$10,887.00
130.00
$7,410.00
255.00
514,535
165.00
$7,405
200.00
111,400
237.00
$13,509
I STORM SEWER, 60' RCP
LF
830
190.00
$157,700
144.00
$119,520.00
120.00
199,600.00
167.00
1138,610
135.00
$112,050
180.00
1149,400
142.00
1117,860
4 STORM SEWER, 60' RCP
LF
50
550.00
$27,500
055,00
$42,750.00
800.00
140,000.00
578.00
$28,900
490,00
$24,500
725.00
$36,250
668.00
133,4`
3ACKEO IN PLACE
5 STORM SEWER, 54' RCP
LF
70
150.00
$10,500
140.00
19,800.00
95.00
$6,650.00
104,00
$7,280
125.00
58,750
150.00
$10,500
146.00
$10,2.0
6 STORM SEWER, 48' RCP
1-F
678
135.00
$91,530
96.50
$65,427.00
90.00
$61,020.00
100,00
167,800
95.00
164,410
124.00
$84,072
106.00
$71,868
7 STORM SEWER, 42' RCP
LF
95
105.00
$9,975
95.25
19,048.75
80.00
17,600.00
82.00
117,790
90.00
$8,550
110.00
$10,450
104.00
$9,880
0 STORM SEWER, 36' RCP
LF
32
80,00
12,560
82.25
$2,632.00
60,00
51,920,00
70.00
$2,240
65.00
$2,080
100.00
53,200
78.00
12,496
9 STORM SEWER, 24' RCP
LF
53
67.00
$3,551
40.00
$2,120.00
35.00
$1.,055.00
35.00
11,855
40.00
$2,120
74.00
$3,922
42.00
$2,226
10 STORM SEWER, 18' RCP
LF
35
30.00
$1,050
40.00
$1,400.00
28,00
1980.00
27.00
$945
35.00
$1,225
70.00
$2,450
34.00
$1,190
11 STORM SEWER, 15' RCP
LF
42
25.00
$1,050
35.00
$1,470.00
25.00
$1,050.00
25.00
$1,050
40.00
11,680
60,00
12,520
30.75
11,291.50
12 STORM SEWER, 12' RCP
LF
75
23.00
41,725
23.00
$1,725.00
22.00
11,650.00
22.00
11,650
26.00
$1,950
50.00
$3,750
29.25
$2,193.75
13 STORM SEWER, 10' RCP
LF
97
19.00
$1,843
26.50
12,570.50
20,00
$1,940.00
22.00
12,134
25,00
$2,425
40.00
$3,880
27.50
12,667.50
14 SANITARY SEWER, 12' PVC
LF
231
32.00
$7,392
31.00
$7,161.00 1
22.50
$5,197.50
30,00
16,930
41.00
$9,471
45,00
$10,395
51,00
111,7(
15 SANITARY SEWER, 12' DI
Lr'
84
36,00
$3,024
45,00
13,780.00
32.00
$2,688.00
36,00
113,024
67.00
15,628
50.00
14,200
59.00
14,956
16 SANITARY SEWER, 0' DI
LF
126
30.00
53,780
35.00
$4,410.00
30.00
$3,780.00
26.00
13,276
75.00
$9,450
35.00
$4,410
54.50
16,867
17 STORM MH, 108' DIA
EA
1
8,000.00
18,000
8,100.00
$8,100.00
8,500.00
$8,500.00
9,500.00
$9,500
7,500.00
$7,500
13,335.00
013,335
10,970.00
110,970
18 STORM MH, 96' DIA
EA
3
7,000.00
$21,000
7,000.00
$21,000.00
6,000.00
118,000,00
6,200.00
$18,600
5,900,00
117,700
10,652.00
$31,956
9,370.00
128,110
19 STORM 11H, 84' DIA
EA
1
6,000,00
$6,000
5,500.00
55,500.00
3,500,00
$3,500.00
3,500.00
13,500
4,000,00
$4,000
6,913.00
$6,913
9,000.00
$9,000
20 STORM IN, 72' DIA
EA
1
4,500.00
14,500
4,750.00
14,750.00
2,000.00
12,000.00
2,700,00
$2,700
3,800,00
$3,800
3,500.00
13,500
5,650.00
15,650
21 STORM AN, 60' CIA
EA
t
3,500.00
$3,500
2,700.00
$2,700.00
1,500.00
$1,500.00
1,900.00
$1,900
1,650.00
$1,650
1,800.00
$1,800
1,840.00
11,840
_2 SANITARY MH, 48' DIA
EA
7
1,500.00
$!0,500
t,800.00
112,600,00
1,000.00
57,000,00
1,100.00
111,900
1,600.00
$11,200
1,500.00
$10,500
3,000,00
121,000
23 RE14F CONCRETE HEADWALL FOR
EA
1
9,000.00
$9,000
5,000.00
$8,000,00
10,500.00
$t0,500,00
13,000.00
$13,000
8,250.00
18,250
10,072,00
1110,072
8,345.00
$8,345
ENGINEERS' OPINION
OF PROBABLE
CONSTRUCTION COST
ITEM UNIT
No. DESCR[PTIOY UNIT QUANTITY PRICE TOTAL
TWIN 54' RCP
24 4'-10'z -6' INLET EA
25 JUNCTION CHAMBER No. I EA
26 JUNCTION CHAMBER No. ? EA
27 FILL 4 ABANDON 24' STORM LF
28 FILL 6 ABANDON 18' STORM ..
29 FILL d ABANDON 15' STORM LF
30 FILL 4 ABANDON 12' STORM LF
31 FILL 6 ABANDON 8' STORM LF
32 FILL 6 ABANDON MANHOLE EA
33 RELOCATE WATER SERVICE LF
34 RELOCATE SANITARY SERVICE LF
35 RELOCATE WATER MAIN, 6' LF
36 RELOCATE WATER MAIN, 8' LF
37 RELOCATE WATER MAIN, 16' LF
30 PAVEMENT REM 4 REPL SY
39 BIT. SURFACE REMOVAL, 2' SY
40 BIT. MATERIALS tPRIME COAT) GAL
41 AGGREGATE (PRIME COAT) TOM
42 BIT COMO SURF CSE,CL I MIS D TOM
43 GRANULAR TRENCH BACKFILL CY
44 SODDING SY
45 COMB CONC CURB 1 GUTTER LF
REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRGSPCT
PHASE I SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
810 TABULTATION
SZABO PAVING 6
NATIONAL SEWER 6
LEAGUE SEWER
BIPAOLO COMPANY KOVILIC CONSTRUCTION
LENNY ROFFMAN
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC,
WATER, INC.
CONSTRUCTION
CO., INC.
EICAVATINB, INC.
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT UNIT
UNIT
PRICE TOTAL
PRICE TOTAL
PRICE TOTAL
PRICE TOTAL PRICE TOTAL
PRICE TOTAL
1
3,500.00
$3,500
2,200.00 $2,200.00
5,000.00
$5,000.00
2,500.00
$2,500
2,100.00
$2,100
1,912.00
$1,912
2,500.00
$2,500
1
12,000.00
$12,000
15,500.00 $15,500.00
20,000,00
$20,000.00
14,000.00
$14,000
39,000.00
$39,000
13,500.00
113,500
29,000.00
$29,000
1
16,000.00
$16,000
16,000.00 $16,000.00
25,000,00
525,000.00
18,000.00
$18,000
39,000.00
$39,000
13,500.00
$13,500
31,000.00
$31,00'
303
11.00
$3,333
28.00 $8,484.00
30.00
$9,090.00
7.00
$2,121
15.00
14,545
20.00
$6,060
20.00
$6,060
150
10.50
11,575
26.00 $3,900.00
30.00
$4,500.00
6.00
$900
9.00
$1,350
15.00
$2,250
20.00
13,000
135
10.00
11,850
24.00 14,440.00
18.00
$3,330.00
5.00
$925
7.00
$1,295
14.00
$2,590
15.00
12,775
60
7.50
$450
21.00 $1,260.00
15.00
$900.00
4.00
$240
4.00
$240
10.00
$600
15.00
1900
65
5.00
$325
20.00 $1,300.00
15.00
$975.00
3,00
$195
4.00
$260
10.00
$650
10.00
1650
2
250.00
$500
200.00 $400.00
500.00
$1,000.00
350.00
1700
350.00
$700
250.00
$500
130.00
$260
210
21.00
$4,410
20.00 $4,200.00
15.00
$3,150.00
12.00
12,520
14.50
$3,045
30.00
$6,300
20.00
$4,200
140
35.00
$4,900
31.00 $4,340.00
35.00
$4,900.00
35.00
14,900
24.00
13,360
50.00
$7,000
39.00
$5,460
40
70.00
$2,800
125.00 15,000.00
40.00
11,600,00
100100
$4,000
130.00
$5,200
50.00
12,000
113.00
14,520
50
85.00
$4,250
75.00 $3,750.00
60.00
13,000.00
100.00
15,000
115.00
$5,750
50.00
$2,500
$5.00
14,250
75
100.00
17,500
130.00 $9,750.00
100.00
$7,500.00
110.00
$8,250
180.00
$13,500
75.00
$5,625
104.00
17,800
2400
35.00
$84,000
17.50 $42,000.00
27.50
$66,000.00
36.00
$86,400
30.00
$72,000
6.00
114,400
32.60
$78,240
4400
1.70
17,480
2.00 18,800.00
4.00
117,600.00
2.00
$8,800
1.70
17,480
5.00
$22,000
2.20
19,680
440
1.00
$440
1.50 $660.00
3.50
$1,540.00
1.50
$660
1.40
$616
1.50
$660
1.65
$726
10
15.00
1150
14.00 $140.00
50.00
$500.00
15.00
$150
10.00
$100
100.00
$1,000
34.50
1345
550
32.00
$17,600
37.00 $20,350.00
39.00
$21,450.00
34.00
$18,700
36.50
$20,075
45.00
$24,750
38.50
$21,175
4000
20.00
$80,000
18.00 $72,000.00
20.00
$80,000.00
20.00
180,000
22.50
190,000
22.00
188,000
14.00
$56,000
i500
5.75
$8,625
5.75 10,625.00
5.001
$7.500.00
4.00
16.000
6.00
$9.000
4.00
16.000
4.00
l6_AAA
3100
15.00
$40,300
11.65 136,115.:}0
$5.00
146,500.00
16.00
$49,600
11.00
$34,100
20.00
$62,000
12.10
137,510
VILLA6E OF MOUNT PROSPCT
PHASE I SEVER IMPROVEMENTS
BID TABULTATION
ENGINEERS' OPINION
OF PROBABLE
SIA86 PAVING 6,
NATIONAL
SEVER I
LEAGUE SEVER
DIPADLO COMPANY
KOVILIC CONSTRUCTION
LENNY HOFFMAN
CONSTRUCTION
COST
CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
NATER,
INC.
CONSTRUCTION
Co.,
INC.
EXCAVATING, INC.
ITEM
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
No. DESCRIPTION
UNIT QUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
46 PCC SIDEWALK REMOVAL
SF
170
5.00
1850
3.00
$510.00
4.50
5765.00
3.50
1595
4.00
1660
4.00
4680
4.00
$680
AND REPLACEMENT
47 DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND
SY
570
27.50
115,675
3.75
12,137.50
23.50
$13,395.00
25.00
$14,250
32.00
118,240
40.00
$22,800
30.25
117,242.50
REPLACEMENT, 6' PCC
48 DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND
SY
25
26.50
4663
35.00
1875.00
19.50
$487.50
40.00
11,000
44.00
$1,100
20.00
1500
26.80
REPLACEMENT, 6' BIT
49 RIP -RAP
SY
40
9.00
1360
272.50
$900.00
30.00
11,200.00
10,00
$800
22.00
1880
30.00
11,200
15.00
1600
50 TREE REMOVAL
IN -DI
18
50.00
$900
13.50
1243.00 1
20.00
1360.00
16.00
$288
31.00
$558
25.00
$450
25.00
$450
51 TREE REPLACEMENT
EA
1
450.00
1900
650.00
$1,300.00
650.00
$1,300.00
500.00
41,000
750.00
$1,500
500.00
$1,000
250.00
1500
52 INLET 24 INCH DIA
EA
5
600.00
13,000
650.00
$3,150.00
500.00
$2,500.00
750.00
$3,750
580.00
12,900
650.00
$3,250
595.00
$2,975
53 TRIPLE INLET
EA
1
2,500.00
42,500
2,250.00
12,250,00
1,500.00
11,500.00
3,200.00
- 13,200
4,000.00
$4,000
1,500.00
11,500
2,170.00
$2,170
54 REM $ REAL GUARD RAIL
LF
20
50.00
$1,000
100.00
12,000.00
25.00
1500.00
20.00
$400
25.00
$500
40.00
1800
45.00
1900
55 8' 6A7E VALVE IN 48' VAULT,
EA
6,500.00
$6,500
3,250.00
13,250.00
6,000.00
$6,000.00
6,500.00
16,500
7,360.00
17,300
4,000.00
14,000
3,500.00
63,500
PRESSURE INSERT
56 6' SATE VALVE IN 48' VAULT,
EA
4,750.00
$9,500
2,800.00
15,600.00
4,000.00
40,000.00
6,000.00
$12,000
6,300.00
$12,600
3,800.00
17,600
3,900.00
$7,800
PRESSURE INSERT
TOTAL
$747,910.50
1646,380.75 1
1671,883.00
$712,463.00
$729,200.00 1
1750,452.00 $
1780,259.25
i Figure Corrected.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPCT
PHASE I SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
BIB TABULTATION
ENGINEERS' OPINION
OF PROBABLE
BAYFIELD CONSTRUCTION
DOMINIC
FIOROIROSA
ROSSI CONTRACTORS
VINCENT DIVITO, INC.
J. CONGDON SEWER
CONSTRUCTION
COST
COMPANY,
INC.
CUNST.
CO., INC.
SERVICES, INC,
[TEN
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
No. i`ESCR='FT10N
UNIT OUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE 10141
PRICE TOTAL
t TRAFFIC CONTROL 4 PROTECTION
LS
i
5,000.00
$5,000.00
18,600.00
418,600.00
32,454.00
132,454.00
10,000.00
110,000.00
7,000.00 $7,000.00
10,000.00 110,000.00
2 STORM SEWER, 66' RCP
LF
57
235.00
$13,395.00
223,00
}12,711.00
153.00
$0,721.00
260.00
$14,820.00
220.00 $12,540.00
216.00 112,312.00
3 STURN SEWER, 60' RCP
LF
030
190.00
1157,700.00
i89.00
$156,870.00
133.00
1110,410.00
142.00
1(17,860.00
197.00 $163,510,00
196.00 1162,680.00
4 STORM SEWER, 60' RCP
LF
50
550.00
127,500.00
765.00
%38,250.00
631.00
131,550.00
712,00
135,600.00
700.00 135,000.00
1,150,00 157,500.00
JACKED IN PLACE
5 STORM SEWER, 54' RCP
LF
70
150.00
}10,500.00
125,00
$6,750.00
102100
$7,140.00
123.00
18,610.00
173,00 %12,110.00
161.00 111,270.00
6 STORM SEWER, 48' RCF
Lf
673
135.00
$91,530.00
108.00
%73,224.00
85.00
$57,630.00
110.00
174,580.00
152,00 %103,056.00
124.50 $84,411.00
7 STORM SEWER, 42' RCP
LF
95
105.00
$9,975.00
93.00
$8,835.00
74.00
%7,030.00
108.00
%10,260.00
142.00 $13,490.00
114.50 $10,877.50
U STORM SEWER, 36' RCP
Lf
32
80.00
}2,560.00
73,00
%2,336.00
63.80
$2,041.60
146.00
14,672.00
124.00 13,968.00
90.00 $2,880.00
9 STORM SEWER, 24' RCF
LF
53
67.00
}3,551.00
51.00
$2,703.00
43.60
12,310.80
70.00
$3,710.00
65.00 $3,445.00
61.00 $3,233.00
10 STORM SEWER, 18' RCP
LF
35
30.00
$1,050.00
39.00
$1,365,00
38.50
$1,347.50
64.00
$2,240.00
54,00 $1,890.00
51.00 11,785.00
11 STORM SEWER, 15' RCP
LF
42
25.00
11,050.00
46.00
$1,932.00
38.55
11,619.10
73.00
$3,066.00
45.00 $1,890.00
46.00 11,932.00
12 STORM SEWER, 12' RCP
LF
75
23.00
$1,725.00
20,00
%1,500.00
28.40
$2,130.00
43,00
$3,225.00
40.00 $3,000.00
44.00 $3,300.00
13 STORM SEWER, 10' RCP
LF
97
19.00
$1,843.00
25.00
$2,425.00
27.60
$2,677.20
40.00
$3,880.00
38.00 $3,686.00
43.00 $4,171.00
14 SANITARY SEWER, 12' PVC
LF
231
32.00
$7,392.00
72.00
$16,632.00
41.80
%9,655.80
89.00
420,559.00
54.00 $12,474.00
30.00 $6,930.00
15 SANITARY SEWER, 12' DI
LF
84
36.00
$3,024.00
78.00
$6,552.00
50.15
14,212.60
96.00
}0,064.00
58.00 %4,872.00
43.00 13,61200
16 SANITARY SEWER, 8' D[
LF
126
30.00
$.3,780.00
55,00
$6,930.00
44.30
$5,581.80
98.00
112,348.00
50.00 $6,300.00
44.60 15,619.60
17 STORM MH, 108' DIA
EA
I
8,000.00
$8,000.00
8,300.00
$8,300.00
6,808.00
}6,808.00
7,600.00
17,600.00
7,000.00 $7,000.00
7,325.00 $7,325.00
18 STORM MH, 96' D[A
EA
,
7,000.00
}21,000.00
6,000.00
$18,000.00
5,302.00
$18,906.00
6,200.00
$10,600.00
6,500.00 $19,500.00
5,630.00 $16,890.00
19 STORM MH, 94' DIA
EA
[
5,000.00
16,000.00
4,130.00
$4,130.00
6,500.00
$6,500.00
4,200.00
%4,200.00
6,000.00 $6,000.00
3,050.00 $3,050,00
20 STORM MH, 72' DIA
EA
1
4,500.00
$4,500.00
4,100.00
$4,100.00
;,665.00
$3,665.00
4,100.00
14,100.00
4,700.00 $4,700.00
2,150.00 42,150.00
21 STORM MH, 60' DIA
EA
1
3,500.00
$3,500.00
t,500.00
$1,500.0[(
2,724.00
$2,724.00
2,500.00
0,500.00
3,200.00 %3,200.00
1,360.00 $1,360.00
.2 SANITARY MH, 48' DIA
EA
7
1,500.00
$10,500.00
1,700.00
111,900.00
2,180.00
$15,260.00
1,750.00
112,250.00
2,600.00 118,200.00
11650.00 $11,550.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPCI
PHASE 1 SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
Bio TABULTATION
ENGINEERS' OPINION
OF PROBABLE
BAYFIELD
CONSTRUCTION
DOMINIC
FIORDIRDSA
ROSSI CONTRACTORS
VINCENT
DIVITO, INC.
J. CON600M SEWER
CONSTRUCTION
COST
COMPANY, INC.
CONST,
CO., INC.
SERVICES, INC.
Ii EM
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
Na. DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
23 REX CONCRETE HEADWALL FOR
EA
1
9,000.00
$9,000.00
3,100.00
53,100.00
9,213.O0
19,213.00
12,700.00
$12,700.00
4,900.00
54,900;00
11,750.00
111,750.00
TWIN 54' RCP
24 4'-SO's 2'-6' INLET
EA
1
3,500.00
13,500.00
2,300.00
12,300.00
4,046.00
14,046.00
4,500.00
$4,500.00
1,800.00
$1,800.00
3,260.00
$3,260.00
25 JUNCTION CHAMBER Na: I
EA
1
12,000.00
$12,000.00
23,500.00
$23,500.00
24,204.00
$24,204.00
48,000.00
$48,000.00
9,500.00
$9,500.00
47,000.00
147,000.00
26 JUNCTION CHAMBER Na. 2
EA
1
16,000.00
$16,000.00
26,600.00
526,600.00
22,44105
$22,447,05
45,000.00
$45,000.00
12,000.00
$12,000.00 -
53,600.00
$53,600.00
27 FILL 3 ABANDON 24' STORM
LF
303
11.00
13,333.00
12.00
13,536.00
9.85
12,984.55
11.00
$3,333.00
10.00
$3,030.00
17.45
$5,287.35
28 FILL $ ABANDON 18' STORM
LF
150
10.50
11,575.00
7.50
$1,125.00
9.00
11,350.00
6.00
$900.00
8.00
$1,200.00
9.80
$1,470.00
29 FILL 6 ABANDON 15' STORM
LF
185
10.00
$1,850.00
5.00
$925.00
8.95
11,655.75
4.00
$740.00
7.00
11,295.00
6.70
11,239.50
30 FILL I ABANDON 12' STORM
LF
60
7.50
$450.00
5.00
1300.00
9.55
$579.00
4,00
1240.00
6.00
1360.00
4.50
1270:00
31 FILL 6 ABANDON S' STORM
LF
65
5.00
$325.00
5.00
$325.00
10.50
$602.50
4.00
$260.00
5.00
$325.00
2.00
$$30.00
32 FILL A ABANDON MANHOLE
EA
2
250.00
1500.00
247,00
$494.00
515.00
il,030.00
350.00
1700.00
300.00
$600.00
125.00
$250.00
33 RELOCATE WATER SERVICE
LF
210
21.00
14,410.00
19.00
$3,990.00
7.65
51,606.50
25.00
$5,250.00
28.00
$5,880.00
17.00
13,570.00
34 RELOCATE SANITARY SERVICE
LF
140
35.00
24,900.00
25.00
$3,500.00
45.75
$6,405.00
63.00
$8,820.00
45.00
$6,300.00
38.00
15,320.00
35 RELOCATE WATER MAIN, S'
LF
40
70.00
$2,800.00
37.00
11,480.00
190.00
47,600.00
125.00
$5,000.00
90.00
13,600.00
64.00
12,560.00
36 RELOCATE WATER MAIN, 8'
LF
50
85.00
$4,250.00
50.00
$2,500.00
130.00
$6,500.00
135.00
$6,750.00
110.00
15,500.00
70.00
13,500.00
37 RELOCATE WATER MAIN, 16'
LF
75
100.00
$7,500.00
123.00
$9,225.00
184.00
113,800.00
120.00
$9,000.00
220.00
$16,500.00
120.00
19,000.00
38 PAVEMENT REM 6 REPL
5r
2400
35.00
$84,000.00
29.00
$69,600.00
42.00
$100,800.00
27.00
$64,800.00
40.00
$96,000.00
30.00
$72,000.00
39 BIT. SURFACE REMOVAL, 2
SY
4400
1.70
17,480,0,}
1.25
$5,500.00
2.15
$9,460.00
2.00
$8,800.00
1.50
$6,600.00
5.50
$24,200.00
40 811 MATERIALS (PRIME COAT)
GAL
440
t.00
1440.00
2.50
$1,100.00
1.00
$440.00
1.00
$440.00
2.D0
$880.00
2.00
$880.00
41 AGGREGATE (PRIME COAT)
TON
10
15.00
$150.00
124.00
$1,240.00
32.00
$320.00
21.00
$210.00
50.00
1500.00
15.00
1150.00
42 BIT CONC SURF CSE,CL I MIX D
TON
550
32.00
117,600.00
43.00
123,650.00
3.00
518,150.OD
30.00
$16,500.00
38.00
$20,900.00
55.00
$30,250.00
43 SRANULAR TRENCH RACKFILL
CY
4000
20.00
180,000.00
28.00
til<,000.00
32.50
$130,000.00
25.00
5100,000.00
26.00
1104,000.00
20.00
180,000.00
44 SODDING
SY
.1500
5.75
58,625.00
3.00
14,50.00
4.40
16,600.00
9.00
$13,500.00
5.00
17,500.00
4.80
$7,200.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPCT
PHASE I SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
BID TABULTATION
I Fiqure Corrected.
ENGINEERS' OPINION
OF PROBABLE
BAYFIELD CONSTRUCTION
DOMINIC FIORDIROSA
ROSSI CONTRACTORS
VINCENT DIVITO, INC.
J. CONGDON
SEWER
CONSTRUCTION COST
COMPANY, INC.
CONST. CO., INC.
SERVICES, INC.
=TEN
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
UNIT
No. DESCRIPTION
UNIT
QUANTITY
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
PRICE
TOTAL
45 COMB CONC CURB 6 GUTTER
LF
3100
13.00
$40,300.00
13.00 $40,300.00
14.30
144,330.00
13.30
$41,230.00
14.00
$43,400.00
9.90
130,690.00
REMOVAL AND E°LACEMENT
46 PCC SIDEWALK REMOVAL
SF
17D
5.00
$850.00
3.70 $629.00
3.05
$518.50
4.00
$680.00
5.00
1850.00
2.65
$450.50
AND REPLACEMENT
47 DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND
SY
570
27.50
$15,675.00
22.00 $12,540.00
26,40
$15,048.00
32.00
118,240.00
36.00
$20,520.00
28.75
$16,387.50
REPLACEMENT, 6' PCC
49 DRIVEWAY REMOVAL AND
SY
25
26.50
$662.50
31.00 $775.00
25.35
$633.75
30.00
1750.00
28.00
$700.00
29.60
1740.00
REPLACEMENT, 6' BIT
49 RIP -RAP
SY
40
9.00
$360.00
43.00 $1,720.00
17.75
$710.00
50.00
$2,000.00
30.00
11,200.00
19.50
$780.00
50 TREE REMOVAL
IN -DI
IB
50.00
$900.00
15.00 1270.00
11.00
$198.00
20,00
$360.00
20.00
$360.00
10.00
$180.00
51 TREE REPLACEMLN]
EA
2
450.00
$900.00
620.00 , $1,240.00
660.00
$1,320.00
500.00
$1,000.00
500.00
$1,000.00
450.00
$900:00
52 INLET 24 INCH DIA
EA
5
600.00
$3,000.00
495.00 $2,475.00
666.00
13,330.00
500.00
$2,500.00
650.00
13,250.00
440.00
$2,200.00
53 TRIPLE INLEI
EA
1
2,500.00
$2,500.00
1,237.00 $1,237.00
4,88B.00
$4,888.00
9,000.00
$9,000.00
2,400.00
12,400.00
5,300.00
$5,300.00
54 REM $ REPL GUARD RAIL
LF
20
50.00
$1,000.00
37.00 $740.00
27.50
$550.00
50.00
$1,000.00
30.00
$600.00
50.00
$1,000.00
55 8' GATE VALVE IN 48' VAULT,
EA
L
6,500.00
$6,500.00
7,700.00 $7,700.00
5,982.00
15,982,00
6,600.00
$6,600.00
2,800.00
12,800.00
5,000.00
$5,000.00
PRESSURE INSERT
56 6' GATE VALVE IN 48' VAULT,
EA
2
4,750.00
$4,500.00
6,500.00 $13,000.00
5,570.00
$11,140.00
5,800.00
$11,600.00
2,500.00
$5,000.00
3,400.00
$6,800.00
PRESSURE INSERT
TOTAL
1747,910.50
$190,761.00
$798,876.00 t
$833,147.00
$838,081.00
1858,152.95
I Fiqure Corrected.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public works
DATE: August 14, 1991
SUBJECT: Construction Engineering Services for
Phase I Storm Sewer Improvements
On July 25, 19§1, invitational notices were sent to five major
engineering firms for proposals to provide construction engineer-
ing services for Phase I storm sewer improvements. Those five
proposals were due on August 12, 1991. Of the five invitational
requests, two companies submitted proposals, two companies de-
clined to submit at this time due to their current work loads,
and the fifth firm did not respond at all.
A review of tbe.proposals as follows:
R.J.N. Environmental $31,954
Donohue & Associates $29,680,
for a difference of $ 2,274.
R.J.N. total hours 660
Donohue hours 580,
for a difference of 80 hrs.
R.J.N. field -related inspection tasks 526 hrs.
Donohue It tv If 480 hrs.,
for a difference of 46 hrs.
R.J.N. average hourly rate $48.42
Donohue if 11 it $51.17,
for a difference of $ 2.75/hr.
R.J.N.'s quote reflects 4.9% of total construction cost, while
Donohue is at 4.6% of total construction cost.
The request for proposals indicated that a total of 60 on-site
construction inspection days would be required. The request
also asked for a maximum not -to -exceed cost, with billings on a
TM basis.
After careful analysis of the proposals, it would be my recommen-
dation to accept the proposal as submitted by R.J.N. Environmen-
tal in a maximum, not -to -exceed amount of $31,954. R.J.N. Envi-
ronmental was our design engineer on this project, and I recom-'
mend that their quote be accepted based on the following ration-
ale: -
Contract specification interpretation -- with the design
�'_ j— actor problems with interpretation of
engineer as &I I
the plans and specifications are eliminated. (Retaining
Donohue and Associates would necessitate the Village's
acting as the moderator between Donohue and the design
engineer, R.J.N., on contract interpretation and enforce-
ment.)
R.J.N.'s doing the construction inspection would ensure
continuity of those services they have already provided;
i.e., soil borings and reports, line and grade, other gov-
ernmental agency contacts and permits, etc.
The request for proposals indicated that, although the
maximum not -to -exceed amount was required, there is a
strong possibility that the actual cost could be consider-
ably lower based upon time and material factors.
R.J.N. has worked with the Village on this and other flood
improvement projects, and they have a proven track record
for not requesting extra funding for their services. In
addition, they have continually met mutually agreed upon
deadlines for submittals. Their firm has very knowledge-
able resources, and its stability is not in question.
R.J.N. added hours which they felt would be required as
part of the inspection -related tasks. Donohue and Associ-
ates only included those hours based upon 60 working days,
and had no consideration for additional hours related to
inspection.
Under the design contract, R.J.N. included all field work
and preparation of documents ready for bidding. Their fee
did not include pre-bid conferences, bid analysis, or pre-
paring bid recommendations; they have provided the Village
of Mount Prospect with these services at no cost.
Typically, a consulting engineering firm that provides design
services and preparation of specifications up through the bid-
ding phase also is awarded the contract for construction -related
services. As stated before, requests for proposals were sent to
five engineering firms for this contract, and any one of them
would have been fully qualified to administer those services in
a professional manner. Although I have recommended R.J.N. Envi-
ronmentalto receive the award, I do not want to imply that
Donohue and Associates is not qualified for this type of work.
If only dollars are to be considered, either engineering firm
would be acceptable.
HLW / -td
RJN-RFP/FILES/SEWERS
11
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 14, 1991
SUBJ: Bid Results - Shade Tree Planting
On August 8, 1991, sealed bids were opened for the provision and
installation of parkway trees. Bid prices were sought for
2-1/211 trees for our Cost Share planting program, 1-1/211 trees
for reforestation, and larger trees for accident replacements.
Bid tabulations are shown on Attachment A.
We structured the bid to allow us to split the award between
various bidders if that was in the best interests of the Vil-
lage. Attachment B shows that splitting our order for 2-1/211
species between Klehm and Berth6ld gives the lowest total cost
It must be noted that at this point we can only estimate quanti-
ties since residents may select their choice of species.
For 1-1/211 trees, the apparent low bidder is wood Landscaping.
However, I am not recommending award of a contract to this compa-
ny for the following reasons. The municipal references supplied
involved very small jobs with limited tree planting, if any.
One reference stated that they had difficulty getting Wood to
commit to a firm start date and completion date. In addition,
Wood's bid specified that they would be using an auger when our
specifications require hand planting. Finally, Wood bid on
several hard -to -find plants that almost no other bidder was able
to locate. when we questioned them on this, they admitted that
it would be difficult to find certain plants of the quality and
species we specified, but they submitted a price anyway.
For these reasons, I recommend that we award the contract for
1-1/2" trees to the second lowest bidder, Arthur J. Weiler Inc.
This company has performed satisfactorily for us in the past.
There is a total of $93,500.00 in various tree planting accounts
in the 1991-92 budget: 1-071-08-6241 (p. 130) 1-071-08-6242 (p.
130), 1-071-08-6243 (p. 130) and 1-07.1-10-8718 (p. 132). Based
on unit costs and estimated quantities, I recommend acceptance
of bids received by Berthold and Klehm Nurseries for 2-1/211
trees and by Arthur Weiler, Inc. for 1-1/211 trees. Total
expenditures not to exceed $93,500.00.
I dkk. ::,51 &;J_e ff_J
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Attachments
SHADEREC.91/FILES/BIDS
Attachment A
Bid Results - Shade Tree Planting
August 8, 1991
Substitutions
A - 'Superform' D- 3' G - 'Magyar' J- 2
B - 2' E - 2' H -'Profusion' K -'Profusion'
C - 2 -Magyar' F - 2 1 - Straight species L - Straight species
WNlua�son
LanW
Kleh
Uncoinf
=25' Hodge Maple._.... Spec es _.___-,
25" Maple
Wa br Inc
�,...... I..... 03 6 ._....,22450 °..._ N249.00
9fi 00, .„.T F m I...,,,N
212.75 v 199 007 350.001 249.00
-YBlack
2 Zi. (i rlmsOn King Maple
275.00
212 75'
243.00 199 001
35000 ! 249.50 249.00
Emerald Queen or
2 5 Emerald Lustre Norway Mapla
325.00 240.00
212.75
_
197.26 199 00
310 1 C 224 50 195.00
2 5 Coiu m nor N orwa_y Mapie
_.--_ .,..
225 00
...w______
212 75 1
.
221.00 199 00'.
..__
444 11 I 239 50 195.00
.,.., _ ,...,,..-,,.
2S Cleveland Norway Maple
mm _
21275.~
......,,. _ ....__ ._
(A�199.00,,,,.._350
......_
00�__ 224.50 225.00
.. ...
2 5 o e orwa a o
..... ___
__
_ ,.198.26
...----231
,..._._....�._..,___
387 62 I 225 00
2 5 Green MI Su ar Ma le Y'
g
_
191 00
226.26 199.00
350.00 A 225.00
._____ ....,,..,�..___...._
2 5 1Hackberr
Y
195.00.
54
.....__ 217.00....
199.00'.
300.00 205.901 195.00
..
2.5 Katsura Tree
240.00
231.50
223.001 199.001
350.00 225.00
_
1-fu-
2 5 rklsh Filbert
231 50
315,651� 224.00
400.00 24_9.50. 230.00
C...
...,._..�.__.
2 5 Amencan Yeilowwood
_
237 50
4
i8 199.00
..._ .._.
249.00.
- .....Autumn Purple Kleinb urg,
.2S or Skyline White Ash
.._...
250.00
I
19425
,.�............._._.........._.......__..,...,_....�....,.,...._,,._,...�_____..,.
246.26 199.00
......
299.00 274.50 225.00'
,.. .., .._.W
Marshall Summit or Patmore
2 S Green Ash
__ __.___-____
199.00
194.25 {
190.00' 199.00
..,.,.
254.73 198.95 190.00
._...______._.,,____,
I 25 Pumpkin As_h
194.25;
„443009
.._---
_
... 2 5 Autumn Gold Ginkgo
194.25
C 199.00
425,00 _ 270 00
2 5 L Princeton Sentry GmkSo
2.5" 1 Skyline or Shademaster Honeylocust
Sentinel Craba Ip e _ �.
270.00
199.00
197.00 j
218.501
164.25��7
268.00 294.00
208.00 199.00
.
425-00 270 00
254.73 219.901 190 00..
230800 209.90 H 150 00
' White Angel, Wyman or Ormiston
2,5' Crabapple
2 5 Ironwood
150.00
1
164 25
223.25 I
155.50 169.00
228.00 229.00
230.00 769.90 150.00
250.00 225.00
„. .. -1...._._.. mmm
2.5' Macho Amur Corktree -_
5" 1 Br --_..____...... ...................
2 5 I Bradford or Autumn Blaze Pear
2 55 , Sawtooth(0)695.00Oak
225.00
200.00
�
212.0
. 193 00 1
_._ 218IX50 I
235.00 199 00
231 00 199 00
250.00 I t 190.00
__,._
250 001 234.50 TM 235.00
450 00 �-- 255.00'
2.5" jNortherr Red Oak-,,........._...rv_rv_......
2.5" 1 English Oak
275.00 1
_
218.50
278 50 1
259.00 22400
259.00 �m 224.00
230,251 255.00
350 00 255.00
.wwwwMMw
?2.5' Nor Silk Tree Lilac'
y 2.5"7 Greenspire Uttleleaf Linden
2.5° Redmond Linden
- 220.00
220.00'
168.30)
186 40
186.40
199 O0 400.001 295.00 230.00
205.00 199 00 300.00 234.50 225.00'.
215.00 199.00 300.00 208.90 225.00
__"a' II
1.5" Hed a Ma _...._.._... _ .,_ ___..._
_,
150.00
...._
101.00',...
322.00'... 159.50 __ 175.00
.....M .w..._,.... _.... ______u.
1.5' Pur leblow Maple
96.00'.,
288.00' 179.50
1,S Hackberry
...m
120.00
,,,,,,,,
89.00
140.00 139.00
243.65'. 149.50 150.00.
.m ______.....
rt
iS"�Aut
190.00
93.00
199.QQT
288.00' 159990 150.00 .
... _
1.5"
175.00
93.00
.....,_.......... ._M_w _
200.00288.001
_
179.90'
1.5' or Magyar Ginkgo
93.00
199.00
310.00 189,90 200,00
1 1.51 Tuliip ee
150 00
86 00
288.00 189.90 175.00
1,5"
Sentinel Crabapple
_
64 00'
288.Q0 _m 139.90. 125 00
I.S.
Macho Amur Corktree
130 00
90.25-
169 00��
299.00 189.90
1,5'
Bradford or Autumn Blaze Pear
_
00
- 116.50
9 149.00
133.00. 159.90'.. 175.00
1.5"
White Oak
_,140
116.00'
387.62 199.50 200.00'
1.5• '..
Northern Red Oak _..___.____.
170.00
108.00
212.00 169.00
265.80 159.90 175.00
1.5"m.
Bur Oak
180.00
111.00
235.00.-
665.001 199.50 175.00
1.5 'ChinkapinOak
W
111.00
235.00'
332.66T-200.00'
1.5•
En dish Oak
112.00
235.00 169.00
500.00 149.50
175.00
1,5•
Silver Linden _mm
170.00
110.00
332.001
159.50
175.00
3'
Su ar Maple
399.00
268.25
350.00 375.00'.
530.00
379.90
360.00
4'
1 Sugar Maple
532.00
3t2.S0�
475.00 475.00
620.001.
629.90
525.00'.
9'
Sugar Me Is
683.00
470.70
602.00 7000,00 mmm
mm
555.00
_ 879.90
750.00
3"
Greens ire Littleleaf Lindon
399.00 320.00
268.25'.
286.00 375.00
350.00
367.90
325.00
4' J
Greens ire Littleleaf Linden
532.1X! 420.00
312.50
478.00 475.00
500.00
_. 399.90'
445.00
5'
Greenspire Littleleaf Lindan
683.00 550.00
420.50
602.00 700.00
655.00
589.90
695.00
3'
Marshall or Summit Green Ash
399.00 275.00
225.00
263,00 295.00 11
288.00
264.50
255.00
4'
Marshall or Summit Green Ash
532.00
276.00
432.00'' 400.00.
586.97
364.50
450.00
5' Marshall or Summit Green Ash
683.00
351.50
555.00 650.00'.
742.02
549.50
550.00
3" Sk! line or__Shademaster Hone locust
_,
399.00 275.00
268.50
303.00 295.00'..
343.32
279.90
285.00
4' S line or Shademas[er Hone locust
532.00
312.50
560.00 475.00
509.40
399.90
450.00
5' Skyline or Shademaster Hone locust
683.00
420.00
699.00 700.00
664.50
589.90
550.00
3' Norwa Me fele
399.DO
271.80
287.00 375.00
443.00
279.90
285.00
4" Norway Ma le
532.00
318.50
495.00 475.00
664.50
_
385.00
S' NolrwayMIs
683.00
418.00
598.00 650.00
886.00
650.00
4" White Angel Crabeppls
420.00
280.00����
337.001 1
420.85
329.90
335.00'
3' Bradford Pear
283.00 320.00
190,001
282.00 375.001
389.84
295.901
285.00
4'......., 6radford Pear
420.00 400.00
265.00
388.00 476.00
620.20
449.901
450.00
Substitutions
A - 'Superform' D- 3' G - 'Magyar' J- 2
B - 2' E - 2' H -'Profusion' K -'Profusion'
C - 2 -Magyar' F - 2 1 - Straight species L - Straight species
Attachment 8
Estimated Quantities/Costs
Partial order from laehm - 2.5' Trees
Partial Order from Berthold - 2.5' Trees
Order from Weiler - f.5' Trees
-2,535ML--.-WB-igE 4,
5,125.00 73,077.80E 235.00J No .00 —9,SDD 5„>143A0
* - incomplete total because of 'No Bid' items
** - Bid price was for substitution
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 9, 1991
SUBJECT: Bid for Services to
to Install, Replace, or Test Water Meters
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 AM on August 8, 1991 for servic-
es to install, replace, and test water meters. This is a two-
year contract with a May 1, 1993 expiration date. There were
two invitational bids sent out plus advertising in the local
paper as required. We only received one bid from the HBK Water
Meter Service Co. and their bid is as follows:
Installation/Replacement Contract
Meter/ROM
5/8"xl/211 or 5/8"x3/4"
water meter
3/411 water meter
111 water meter
1-1/211 water meter
Meter/Access Plus
$36.80/meter
36.80 11
36.80 11
36.80 11
Installation/Replacement Contract
Labor Rate
Not -to -Exceed
Meter Size
per Hour
Time-Hrs/Mins
ONE MAN
5/8"x 1/211 or 5/8"
x 3/411 $ 47.58
1-1/2 hr.
3/411
47.58
1-1/2 hr.
1'1
47.58
1-1/2 hr.
1-1/211
47.58
2 hr.
TWO MEN
211
$ 95.16
2 hr.
311
95.16
2-1/2 hr.
411
95.16
3 hr.
THREE MEN
611 142.74 8 hr.
Bit 142.74 8 hr.
TestingContract Two -Men Not to
Labor Rate Exceed Time
2" water meter test $95.16/hr. 2 hrs.
311 11 it of 95.16 2
Vf If 95.1611 2
611 it 95.16 3
Big if if 95.16 4
211 if repair 95.16 4
311 If it to 95.16 4
411 it 11 it 95.16 4
6" if if 95.16 4
Bit if n if 95.1611 4
* plus repair part costs
FM Bypass Meter Replacements
5/811 water meter $21.67/meter
iff 21.67
1-1/2 43.26
On page 149 of the current budget, there is $20,000.00 under
account code 41-072-07-6216 for meter installation work and
$10,000.00 under account code 41-072-07-6218 for meter testing
and repair. There is an additional $12,000 allocated for meter
repair parts under account code 41-072-07-7213 for repair of
defective meters. These repair parts are usually needed on the
larger meters and are purchased and installed by the meter ser-
vice contractor. Our cost for testing and repair of two-inch
and over meters is backcharged to the water customer.
I recommend that HBK Water Meter Service be awarded a contract
for two years in the manner described in the bid documents in an
amount not to exceed $30,000 for the current fiscal year.
HLW/td
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: August 13, 1991
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION
Northwest Highway Sidewalk Improvement
Maple Street to School Street
On Aut 12, 1991, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for
the Northwest Highway Sidewalk Improvement.
BIDS RECEIVED
A total of seven contractors submitted bids. The bids range from
a low of $15,465.00 by Unison Construction to a high of $33,285.00
by Globe Construction Co. The Engineer's Estimate for the project
was $22,621.00.
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds or Cashier Checks,in the amount of
lot of their total bid as required by the Contract Documents. All
Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bond.
BIDDER AMOUNT
1.)
UNISON CONSTRUCTION
$15,465.00
2.)
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION
$15,861.00
3.)
J.R. & V. CONSTRUCTION
$16,681.00
4.)
SCHROEDER & SCHROEDER'
$23,694.50
5.)
A & R CONSTRUCTION
$24,809.95
6.)
ALLIANCE CONTRACTORS
$26,957.50
7.)
GLOBE CONSTRUCTION
$33,285.00
8.)
ENGINEERS ESTIMATE
$22,621.00
QUALIFICATIONS OF LOW BIDDER
The low bidder, Unison Construction Co. has not completed work in
the village up to this time. Unison Construction Co., is a new
minority business that has limited working experiences. However,
larger construction companies who have used Unison Construction
Co., have had no problems with them. Unison Construction Co., is
also prequalifed with the Illinois Department of Transportation.
Page Two
Northwest Highway Sidewalk Improvement
Maple St. to School St.
REgOMMENDATIQN
The Village is obligated to replace this sidewalk as part of the
Redevelopment Agreement with Homes by Hemphill for Target Area A
in the TIF District.
Based on the Bids received and the size of this project, I
recommend awarding a contract to Unison Construction Co., Cicero,
IL. with a Bid price of $15,465.00.
Funding for this project is shown on Page 170 of the 1991-92 budget
under Account Code No. 56-077-62-8030.
�kFJ�14
lbecker
I concur with the above recommendation
�" M, ukw&�
David Clements,
Director of Planning and Zoning
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: EXPENSES, JULY 4, 1991 PARADE
DATE: JULY 16, 1991
As you know, the 1991 July 4th Parade was a very successful, in
fact it was so successful that exceeded the budgeted amount by
approximately $2,500.00.
The number of organizations that participated in our 50/50 float
program (the Village pays $250.00 for each float) was more
successful than ever, which resulted in our expenses exceeding the
budgeted amount.
We only had a maximum of 8 participants in the past and this year
there were 17 signed up, one float did not arrive and we received
a credit for another one that broke down during the parade.
Attached is a list of expenses. We have paid everyone except the
float company. We have not received all the bills from everyone
yet.
Next year will be an exception as it pertains to parade, but in
1993 we will put a cap on the number of floats participating in the
50/50 program so this should not happen again.
It would be very much appreciated if the Village would issue a
check in the amount of $2-,�� to cover our ur shortfall.
Thank you for your understanding.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
JULY 4TH PARADE, 1991
LIST OF EXPENSES
KCM Productions:
Calliope
Mariachi Band
Inflated people
DCA Associates:
Elephants
Honey Bears
Prospect High Marching Band
Cavaliers
Jesse White Tumblers
Emerald Society Drum & Bugle Corp.
old Fashioned Calliope
Candy (Trustee Corcoran)
Associated Attractions:
15 floats @ $250.00 each
as Village's share
Total
Beginning Balance $ 9,370.00
Expenses 11,848.00
Balance 2,478.00)
2,100.00
2,250.00
750.00
1,300.00
500.00
800.00
350.00
48.00
:3
,,750,00
$11,848.00
•
tr Custom Parade Flow
Flag Decorating
Pennants — Flags
Materials
Grand Openings
4834 S. HALSTED, BUILDING 14 • CHICAGO, IL 606094487 • Area (312) 376-1900 1
July 17, 1991 VUW 00"
INS gr=
Velma W. Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
100 S. Emrosn St. 2 4 1991
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 (t�00
Dear Ms. Lowe:
Here is the list of Mt. Prospect floats that you requested.
Mt. Prospect Library 17784 250-00
United Way Mt. Prospect 17992 250-00
Mt. Prospect Bicentenniall8099 250-00
cam.
St. Raymond 18065 250-00
1st Nat'l Bank of 18090 250-00
Mt. Prospect
ERA H & H 18143 250-00
Paddock Publications 18106 250-00
Mt. Prospect Nurses 18100 a5a-.ec- 'gov,
Women of the Moose 18101 250.00
Mt. Prospect Park Dist. 18115 250-00
Stark Real Estate 18:Ll4 250-00
Mt. Prospect Rotary 18119 250-00
Save -A -Pet 18116 250-00
1st Cbgo Bank Mt. 18190 250-00
Prospect
TOM: $3,400.00
3 55 . 0-0
SINCERELY,
Steve Jolmson
A
WN
Mount Prospect Public Works Department,
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TREE crn USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director of Public Works
DATE: August 7, 1991
SLTBJ. Christmas Decorations
In 1979, the Village entered into the first of four, three year
contracts with Folger Flag and Decorating for the rental of
Christmas decorations. These contracts included all illuminated
decorations and in years 1988-90 expanded to include Christmas
Banners. In each contract the contractor was responsible for
installation, repair, removal and storage of all decorations and
banners. The original contract covered 56 locations and has
grown to 90 locations for decorations and 57 locations for ban-
ners in 1988-90.
Each time that the contract expired the Public Works Department
solicited proposals from other suppliers, but in each case, we
found that there were other companies who could supply the deco-
rations but no one could provide the same service of installa-
tion, repair and storage. In addition to this, in all cases the
actual cost of a direct purchase was higher than what we were
quoted by Folger's for the full service.
Folger's contract expired last year (1990) and again this year
requested proposals from other suppliers. No other company
could supply the same scope or services, however two companies
did submit a price for purchase only.
Proposals were requested for 96 illuminated decorations: 30-12
foot candle scrolls; 46-8 foot lanterns; and 20-8 foot orna-
ments. No banners are needed because we purchased them and all
are in usable condition. Proposals received were:
Display Sales $33,296.00
Holiday Lites & Trim 28,593.00
Folgers Flag & Decorating 27,000.00
Display Sales and Holiday Lites were for direct purchase
whereas Folgers' price was for a three year rental includ-
ing installation, removal, repair and storage payable at
the rate of $9,000 per year.
Based on the above proposals I request that the Village Board
waive the bidding process and award a three(3) year contract to
Folger Flag and Decorating for a total of $9,000 per year. The
contract will include ninety-six(96) decorations and cover rent-
al, repair, removal and storage. Funding for this proposed
expenditure can be found on Page 178, Account No. 01-081-03-6624
where there is $9,500 allocated.
Glen R. Andler
I concur with this request.
Herbert L. Weeks
XMASDECO.R/FILES/CIVEVNTS