HomeMy WebLinkAbout4301_001'ILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4331
Next Resolution No. 33-91 ALL
T*
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, lst Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center August 6, 1991
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Consider action relative to the Mayor's veto
of Ordinance No. 4325, creating a Class 11P11
liquor license for the Convenience Food Mart at
2025 East Euclid Avenue.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Z ' BA 35-V-91, 112 East Northwest Highway
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 112 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
This Ordinance grants the variations necessary
to construct the new Fire and Police Station at
the existing location. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests. (Exhibit A)
B. ZBA 36-V-90, 11 South Pine Street
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
11 SOUTH PINE STREET
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a
5 foot sideyard setback, rather than the
required 101, in order to accommodate three
trailers on a temporary basis. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B)
Mayor Gerald
#'Skip$' Farley
Trustee
Mark Busse
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee
George Clowes
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Trustee
Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Irvana Wilks
AUNIMEMMMEMME
111. INVOCATION -
Trustee Busse
August 6, 1991
ANINNEENIM
IV. APPROVAL OF
MINUTES OF REGULAR
MEETING, July 16, 1991
August 6, 1�
V. APPROVAL OF
BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Consider action relative to the Mayor's veto
of Ordinance No. 4325, creating a Class 11P11
liquor license for the Convenience Food Mart at
2025 East Euclid Avenue.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Z ' BA 35-V-91, 112 East Northwest Highway
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 112 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
This Ordinance grants the variations necessary
to construct the new Fire and Police Station at
the existing location. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests. (Exhibit A)
B. ZBA 36-V-90, 11 South Pine Street
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT
11 SOUTH PINE STREET
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a
5 foot sideyard setback, rather than the
required 101, in order to accommodate three
trailers on a temporary basis. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B)
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
MODIFICATION FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1824 SITKA LANE
This ordinance grants a modification from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) to permit a
driveway width of 231 411 with an additional
2-1/21 flare on the east side of the parkway.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
the driveway width and the Plan commission
recommended granting the additional flare on (Exhibit C)
the parkway.
D. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
(TRAFFIC CODE)
This Ordinance amends the Traffic Code to
allow certain violations to be paid by mail,
therefore eliminating an appearance in court (Exhibit D)
that may otherwise be required.
IV. FEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 3o -V-91, 407 S. Meier Road
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a 2.331 side yard, rather than the
required 6.51, in order to accommodate an
existing basketball court. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 6-0.
B. ZBA 37-V-91, 205 South Audrey Lane
The petitioner is requesting variations to
allow a 231 611 front yard setback, rather than
the required 301 and to allow a 61 91, sideyard
setback, rather than the requiredto
allow the construction of an addition to
an existing one -car garage. By a unanimous
vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals •
recommended
denying the request for the 231 61, front yard
a'nd recommended unanimously to approve the
request for a 61 91, sideyard setback.
c. ZBA 38-V-91, 1201 West Busse Avenue
The petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a 21 foot front setback to allow an
addon to an existing garage and home.
By a unanimous vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended denying this request.
D. ZBA 39-V-91, 1050 south Linnemann Road
The petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a circular driveway and the resulting 48%
front yard lot coverage, rather than the permitted
35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
E. ZBA, 40 -SU -91 and ZBA 41-V-91, 625 Meier Road
The peoner is requesting a Special use Permit
to allow a 3 -car garage and a variation to allow
a 34 foot wide driveway, rather than the permitted
211. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote
F. ZBA 42-V-91, 748 Whitegate Drive
The Petitioner is appealing the 3-4 decision of
the Zoning Board of Appeals, which approval is
final, to deny the following requests: Variations
to allow a driveway 25 feet wide, rather than the
permitted 211 width; to allow 48.8% lot coverage,
rather than the permitted 45%; and, to allow a
front yard lot coverage of 39.9%, rather than
the permitted 35%.
G. ZBA 43-V-91, 1818 Aztec Lane
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow construction of a deck which will result
in a 11 511 side yard at the narrowest point,
rather than the required 101. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 4-1.
H. ZBA 44-V-91, 503 South Elmhurst Road
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a circular driveway and to allow a front yard
coverage of 53.8%, rather than the allowed 35%.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
this request by a vote of 2-3.
I. ZBA 47-V-91, 600 Carboy Road
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a 10 foot rear yard to accommodate a building
addition, rather than the required 201. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-0.
J. ZBA 48 -SU -91, 1840-1894 S. Elmhurst Road
The Petitioner is requesting an amendment to the
Special Use granted in Ordinance No. 4156 in
order to allow limited retail uses in the Rogers
Industrial Park. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 5-0.
K. ZBA 49-Z-91, 1910 South Busse Road, Cook County
School Bus Company
The Petitioner is requesting the property be
re -zoned from R -X, which is automatic zoning
following annexation, to R-4. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-0.
L. Accept private improvements installed in
conjunction with the new Mt. Plaines
Animal Hospital, 888 E. Northwest Highway.
M. Accept private improvements installed in
conjunction with the Kentucky Fried Chicken
1440 S. Elmhurst Road (in front of Venture).
N. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance establishes regulations
governing disposal of medical waste. (Exhibit E)
0. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance establishes regulations
governing locations of newspaper vending
machines. (Exhibit F)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. Fire Department Turnout clothing
2. Fire Department Workout Clothing
3. Fire Department self -Contained Breathing Apparatus
4. High Speed Hydraulic pumps
S. Request to waive bidding procedure and authorize
electrical service connections for the Prospect
Medical Center and Senior citizen Center as the
last phase of the parking lot improvement.
C. Request to increase contract amount with
Johnson Paving Company for Dogwood Lane
reconstruction improvement.
D. Request to waive bidding procedure and authorize
the purchase of a defibrillator/monitor unit
(Lifepac 10), which is specialized equipment.
E. 1st reading of A14 ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF MISCELLANEOUS PROPERTY" OWNED BY
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance authorizes the sale of
vehicles and equipment through the annual
auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal (Exhibit G)
Conference.
F. Accept proposal for the 1991 material testing
program
G. Request to increase the contract for the 1991
Resurfacing Program as approved in the budget.
H. status Report
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JULY 16, 1991
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:31 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee George Clowes
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Irvana Wilks
Absent: Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Paul Hoefert
INVOCATION
The invocation was.given by Mayor Farley. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Clowes, seconded by Trustee Wilks, moved APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the Regular Meeting of the MINUTES
Mayor and Board of Trustees held July 2, 1991, as
amended.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Floros, Wilks, Farley
Nays: None
Pass: Corcoran
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved APPROVE BILLS
to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 876,727
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
9,425
Community Development Block Grant
Fund
4,901
Illinois Municipal Retirement
Fund
64,123
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
542,342
Parking System Revenue Fund
13,130
Risk Management Fund
51,737
Vehicle Replacement Fund
395
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or
Rep. Fund
7,513
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
1985
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
1991
2,506
Fire & Police Building Const.
81,642
Flood Control Revenue Fund
67,419
Corporate Purpose Improvement
1990
-
Debt Service Funds
157,708
Flexcomp Trust Fund
7,996
Escrow Deposit Fund
13,456
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,903,187
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes,
Corcoran,
Floros,
Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran noted that the costs for Village owned
mobile phones has increased and asked for An itemized
list of those employees having mobile phones.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
accept the financial report dated June 30, 1991,
subject to audit.
Upon roll'call: Ayes: ClOwes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
JULY 4TH PARADE
Mayor Farley and'Vill'age clerk Carol Fields presented
were judged
AWARDS
trophies to the f0110wi ng organizations who
the best floats in the July 4th Parade:
First Place: 'Busse Flowers
Second Place: Mount Prospect Nurses Club
Third Place: -First National Bank of Mount Prospect
TOM ABRAMS
Tom Abrams presented the Tom Abrams trophy for the best
in the July 4th Parade to St. Raymond's
TROPHY
participation
Cub scout Pack 55.
BUSSE SCHOOL
Tom Starck, representing the Creative Children's
&
PROPERTY
Academy, located in the former Busse School (Henry
the Village Board to support the
Owen Streets), asked
CCA in their efforts to extend the lease on the school
building and relay that support to the Mount Prospect
Park District. Mr. Starck noted that the current lease
will expire in 1993 at which time the Park Board plans
'that
to demolish the building. It was noted CCA is
willing to PaY for improvements, including the
installation of A parking lot. He asked the Village
to remove the asphalt parking strip along Henry Street,
if the lease is extended.
Mayor Farley stated that while this is a matter between
CCA and the Park District, he supports both the
Creative Children's Academy as well as the Suzuki Music
School,, however, each Trustee could express their
feelings on this matter. It was also noted that if
necessary, the Village would consider removing the
asphalt strip.
VETO:
MAyORls REPORT
Mayor Farley stated that he did not support the
ORD.NO. 4325
creation of a Class 11P11 liquor license for a Convenient,
Food Mart, approved through the adoption of ordinance
No. 4325 at the last meeting and therefore vetoed that
ordinance.
Mayor Farley stated that he did not see a need for it
alcoholic
local convenience type store to sell
stating that he thought it could add to the
beverages,
problems already associated with alcohol.
it was noted by members of the Board that the Ordinance
was passed by 'a 4-2 vote and several members expressed
their disappointment that the Mayor would take this
action.
It was statedthat the Trustees could override the
Mayor's veto at the next regular meeting, August 6th.
A motion to pass Ordinance No. 4325, and override the
Mayor's veto would need 4 affirmative votes.
This subject will be presented at the August 6th
meeting.
Pa I ge 2 - July 16, 1991
Mayor Farley stated that due to the recent discussion PLACE
regarding naming the new Fire and Police Station, NAMING
he feels it would be appropriate to create a "Place COMMITTEE
Naming Committee" to establish a policy on naming
buildings and/or streets after elected officials or
residents of the Village.
Mayor Farley stated that he would appoint the
following people to the Place Naming Ad Hoc Committee
with their recommendations to be submitted to the
Village Board at the September 10th Committee of the
Whole meeting:
Trustee Leo Floros, Chairman
Trustee Paul Hoefert
Earl Lewis
Ralph W. Arthur
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 35-V-91, 112 East Northwest Highway
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant the variations necessary to
construct the new Fire and Police Station
at the existing location, 112 East Northwest
Highway. The variations requested are as follows:
1. To allow a 12 foot front yard, instead of
the required 30 feet;
2. To allow an 8 foot sideyard, instead of the
required 101, and a 11 411 exterior sideyard,
rather than the required 301;
3. To allow a 10 foot parking lot setback from
the right-of-way, instead of the required 301,
and a 3.77 foot setback on the west lot line,
instead of the required 101;
4. To allow 80.7% lot coverage, rather than
the 75% maximum allowed;
5.To allow a building height of 40.5 feet,
rather than the 301 allowed;
6. To allow 99 on-site parking spaces, rather
than the required 137; and
7 To waive the requirement for a 121 x 351
loading space.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
the variations requested by a vote of 6-0, except
for variation #6 which resulted in a vote of 5-1.
Bruce Longman, 211 S. Hi Lusi, expressed concern
that the Village was proposing a building larger
than permitted, due to the fact that 7 variations
were being requested.
It was noted that the proposed building will have
less lot coverage than the existing building and
that the 30 foot front yard setback is not
realistic, especially as it applies to the downtown
district. The regulations are being reviewed
with the possibility that amendments may be
proposed in the near future that more realistically
apply to the downtown area.
Page 3 - July 16, 1991
ZBA 35-V-91
112 E.N0Rrff4EST
FIRE & POLICE
STATION
This ordinance will be presented August 6th for second
reading.
ZBA 36-V-91,
ZBA 36-V-91, 13
11 S. PINE ST,
An Ordinance we
grant a variati
rather than' th
trailers, it
used by the Pol
locker rooms UT
constructed. T)
granting this I
This ordinance
reading.
ADDRESS
An ordinance w<
CHANGES
would change co
Village which N
It was noted t'
resulting froz
annexations, wk
Enhanced 9-1-1
it is importar
provided in or
response time.
ORD.NO. 4328
Trustee Wilks,
passage of Ord
AN ORDIN
ROOSEVELT
MOUNT PRO
Upon roll call
Motion carried
NEW BUSINESS
MODIFICATION An ordinance w
FROM DEVELOPMENT would grant a
1824 SITKA LANE (Chapter 16) f
to permit a 2 -
parkway. The F
modification.
outh Pine street
presented for first reading that waild
to allow a 5.foot sideyard setback,
required 101, in order to allow 3
s noted that these trailers will be
a Department on a temporary 'basis for
1 the new Fire and Police Station is
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
ruest by a vote of 6-0.
11 be presented August 6th for second
presented for second reading that
tain addresses within areas of the
re annexed within the last few years.
,t this Ordinance will clarify issues
law suits filed objecting to the
zft have since been dismissed. With the
(stem almost ready for implementation,
that correct address information be
.r for the system to provide accurate
econded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
[ance No. 4328
4CE RENUMBERING CERTAIN LOTS AND
AND CHANGING THE STREET NAME OF
,VENUE TO MEIER ROAD IN THE VILLAGE OF
IECT
Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks
Nays: None
esented for first reading that
Ication from the Development Code
,operty located at 1824 Sitka Lane
,'oot flare on the east side of the
:)mmission recommended granting this
It was noted that the Petitioner had filed a request
for a 231 411 wide driveway before the zoning Board of
Appeals. The Zoning Board of Appeals, which is final
in this instance, granted this request.
This ordinance will be presented August 6th for second
reading.
AMEND An ordinance
ORD.NO. 4222 amend Ordin&
32 S. BUSSE ROAD period for t)
1992. It wat
begin constri
extension be
Trustee Corc(
waive the rul
Upon roll ca
Motion carr
s presented for first reading that would,
e, No. 4222 by extending the effective
variations from August, 1991 to August,
noted that the Petitioner was unable to
:ion of this new house and asked that the
ranted.
ran, seconded by TrUstee ClOWeS, moved to
e, requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
.1: Ayes: clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks
Nays: None
ad.
Page 4 - July 16, 1991
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes,
ORD.NO. 4329
moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4329
AN ORDINANCE EXTENDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
ORDINANCE NO. 4222 FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 32
SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
SELL
would authorize the sale of miscellaneous interior
MISCELLANEOUS
fixtures, through a public auction, prior to the
VILLAGE OWNED
demolition of the Public Safety Building.
PROPERTY
It was noted that interest has been expressed in
purchasing the windows and other miscellaneous
items and an auction would be the most equitable
method of disposal.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
FIELD CHANGE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
ORD.NO. 4330
for passage of Ordinance No. 4330
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF
MISCELLANEOUS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH. 18
would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) to allow
certain violations to be paid by mail, rather than
requiring a court appearance. This method of
collection would reduce overtime costs, due to the
fact that the Police Officer would not have to
appear in court if the violator plead guilty by
submitting payment.
This Ordinance will be presented August 6th for
second reading.
A request was presented to grant a field change
FIELD CHANGE
for property located at 831 Partridge Lane, which
HUNTINGTON
is located within the Huntington Commons Planned
COMMONS
Unit Development. The property owner would like
PUD
to screen in a patio.
831 PARTRIDGE
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
Page 5 - July 16, 1991
to grant a field change for property located at 831
Partridge and allow a screened -in patio.
Upon roll call: Ayes: clowes, Corcoran, Floros, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
BLANKET FIELD
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Clowes, moved
of the
CHANGE:
to concur with the recommendation
and grant a blanket field change for
HUNTINGTON
COMMONS PUD -
administration
properties located within the Huntington Commons
porch
PORCH ENCLOSURES
Planned Unit Development and permit
enclosures.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Clawes, Corcoran, F1'oros, Wilks
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ENHANCED 9-1-1
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon informed the Board
that the new Central Dispatch building is nearing
completion with moves -in schedule for the first week
in August. He also stated that the Enhanced 9-1-1
system will be activated approximately 2 to 3 weeks
later.
Mr. Dixon noted that the monthly fee of 75 cents per
telephone line presently being charged for 9-1-1 will
be reduced to possibly 30 cents no later than October,
1991.
FIRE & POLICE
The Village Manager stated that the Fare and Police
into their
MOVE: TEMPORARY
administrative personnel will be moving
in the First Chicago Bank on August
QUARTERS
temporary quarters
1st with the rest of Fire and Police personnel moving
into the former Public Works Building at 11 South Paine
Street on August 12th.
DOUBLE TAXATION
Mr. Dixon reported that the administration is assisting
double -taxed
AREA
those residents of the Village who were
as the Elk Grove Mural Fire
(by the Village as well
ProtectionDistrict) in obtaining a refund for the 1989
taxes.
Y OTHER BUSINESS
A was presented as to whether the Village
PARK DISTRICT
question
would allow the Mount Prospect Park District to display
BANNERS
,park 'District banners on the poles instead of Village
banners for a period of 5 weeks in an effort to promote
the opening of their new RecPlex on Dempster Street.
Mr. Dixon stated that the Mount Prospect Park District
would provide the banners and would pay for
installation and removal.
The Village Board gage their approval for the 'Moun-
for
prospect Park District to utilize the Village poles
their banners as presented by the Village. Manager.
Page 61'I- July 16, 1991
Trustee Wilks congratulated Fire Chief Cavello, BURN CAMP
on his involvement with the Burn Victim Camp,
which is a very successful and worthwhile event.
Trustee Wilks also stated that since Mayor Farley SISTER
had asked her to represent the Village in the Sister CITIES
Cities Program, she would be attending the convention PROGRAM
in Chicago next week.
ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN
Mayor Farley declared the meeting adjourned at
9:18 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 7 - July 16, 1991
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
July 31, 1991
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
7/12/91 through
Per Attached
Journal
Balance
7I12I91
7131I91
List of Bills
Entry
7731/91
General &_Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 1,782,236
$ 661,761
$ 653,003
<30,000>
$ 1,760,994
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
799,966
96,155
168,942
727,179
Community Development Black Grant Fund
341
19,000
18,558
783
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
300
50,754
80,883
30,000
171
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
2,820,706
208,597
74,026
2,955,277
Parking System Revenue Fund
105,298
10,195
1,392
114,101
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,008,927
197,308
111,912
1,094,323
Vehicle Replacement Fund
438,770
126,900
7,796
557,874
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Fund
142,456
18,005
3,395
157,066
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
143,693
1,125
17,134
127,684
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1991
493,011
-
3,043
489,968
Police & Fire Building Construction
6,352,848
154,322
71,865
6,435,305
Flood Control Revenue Fund
2,813,367
-
36,801
2,776,566
Debt Service Fund
861,678
675
-
862,353
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
375
1,639
-
2,014
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,372,093
15,847
21,567
1,366,373
Police Pension Fund
15,928,056
100,432
42,349
15,986,139
Firemen's Pension Fund
17,936,402
112,621
43,756
18,005,267
Benefit Trust Funds
248 876
248,876
$53.249.399
51,775,336
X1.356.422
-
853.668,313
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7%31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ACRO R&R SERVICES, INC.
BOND REFUND C8859
BOND REFUND C8983
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
KATHY ALLEN
AMERICAN ANIMATION INC
OVERHEAD ANIMATION KIT
SUNSET RD RECONSTRUCTION
$215.00
$34,543.80
$215.00
$34,543.80
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
RICH BIALEK
REPAIR LAWNMOWER
$87.51
$87.51
BOLASH CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND C8214
$100.00
$61.96
$100.00
THOMAS A. BRAUN
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$6.02
$67.91
BURMEISTER PLBG. & HTG.
BOND REFUND C9356
$100.00
$66.44
$100.--.
PATRICK T. CASEY
REFUND FINAL BILL
REFUND FINAL BILL
$6.70
$73.14
CB COMMERCIAL
CENTRACCHIO & SON INC.
BOND REFUND 1358
BOND REFUND C9325
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
V.J.
CLAUSS FUELS, INC.
FUEL
PMT P/R 7/25
$9,067.66
$224.25
$9,067.66*
$224.25*
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
FRANK CLESEN AND SONS, INC.
FLOWERS
$1, 092.00
FLOWERS
$50.00
FLOWERS
492.20
FLOWERS
$1,035.60
$2,669.80
ROSCOE E. CONKLIN
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$2.28
$.22
$2.50
CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$2.28
$.22
$2.50
CUSTOM WOOD WORKS
BOND REFUND C9351
$100.00
$2.52
$100.00
ARTHUR F. DANIELS
REFUND FINAL BILL
REFUND FINAL BILL
$25.20
$27.72
PAUL DAVIS SYSTEMS
BOND REFUND C8998
$75.00
$83.30
$75.00
ROGER DIONNE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$8.40
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
FZR ENDING 7Z25Z91
$39$775.23
P/R ENDING 7/25/91
$411,945.50
P R ENDING 7/25/91
$1,690.24
$454,278.52*
DON DIVITO
BOND REFUND C9039
$100.00
$225.00
$100.00
EIRE CORPORATION
BOND REFUND C6829
BOND REFUND C6829
$325.00
$550.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
HOWARD ELLIOTT
FELDCO PATIO ROOM, INC.
THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P.
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
RICK FORD
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
TONY GUARISCO PLBG.
HEWLETT PACKARD
BERNARD HUDEC
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE
INVERNESS TITLE
RALPH E. JACKSON
JACOBS AND SONS, INC.
RAYMOND S. JOHNSTON
JOSEPH BUILDERS
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
KATHCON PROPERTIES
GEORGE KHOURY
LEATHERMAN
LAUREL LOOS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 731/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$7.14
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
00.00
BOND REFUND C9149
SECURITY DEP AUG RENT
2$1100.00
$2,600.00
REPLACE UNITED WAY CHECKS
DEP PAY 7/11
$431.91
$11,797.76
DUE TO FED
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/11
$119.21
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7211
$54.53
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/11
$2,876.51
$1,033.53
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7211
7/25
$1,100.00
SAVINGS BONDS PIR
DUE TO FED DEP PPAY /25
$948.58
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 725
DEP PAY 7225
58.91
$2,999.55
DUE TO FED
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/25
$128.23
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7f25
$12,034.35
BOND REFUND
$35.00
$3505
BOND BADGEREFUND C7916
$100.00
QUARTERLY MTCE BILLING
$309.00
$658.00
RESIDENT TR TAX REBATE
EMPLOYER SHARE JULY'91
$39,649.09
EMPLOYEE SHARE JULY'91
$16,309.18
$1.$92.23
EMPLOYER SHARE JULY ADJ
03
$9900
JULY PREMIUM
TRANSFER TAX REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
MAIN & BUSSE PARKING LOT
$17,133.97
RESIDENT TR TAX REBATE
$2875.00
00
BOND REFUND 08043
$$75.00
PMT P/R 7/25
BOND REFUND C6073
50.00
295.00
BOND REFUND C6073
$1,295.00
$$50 00
BOND REFUND C9245
$ 00
TOOLS
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.38
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
LORENS RODDING & PLUMBING
LUBE PROS
MAC'S FIRE AND SAFETY, INC.
MCA SYSTEMS
MITSUBISHI ELECTRONICS AMERICA
ROBERT MOORE
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE EXPLORER
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
HERBERT MUELLER
LAURA B. MUNN
EDWARD J. NAWOJ
NIMBUS ELETRIC
VICTORIA L. O'CONNELL
STEWART OLESON
OPUS
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
LINDA PETERSON
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
KATHLEEN PINAS
PINEWOOD CONSTRUCTION
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTMASTER
R J & G SEWER
R 0 R SUPERIOR
TODD RAEDER
JOHN RESCHKE
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNPAYMENABDATEAPPRO AL REPORT
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.24
$100.00
$2.62
BOND REFUND C8940
$75.00
$175.00
BOND REFUND 08945
B OND REFUND C8337
$ 4,0.00
$40.00
$4
$4,0.00
$40.00
$4
REPAIRS
BOND REFUND C8977
$75.00
$100.00
$75.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C9201
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$.72
$7.14
$7.86
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$486.00
$486.00
CASE 91-1.7674
PPRT-5TH ALLOCATION
$4,446.51
$4,446.51*
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$14.28
$1.44
$15.72
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$3.74
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$38.76
$42.50
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.38
24
$2$2.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
ELECTRIC WIRING 101 F MAPLE
..62
$1,000.00
$ 1,0
$50.00
BOND REFUND C9282
$50.00
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C8615
$500.00
5500.00
BOND REDUND
JULY FIRE PENSION DISB
$43,
$42,334949.07 07
$86,104.70*
JULY POLICE PENSION DISB
$1$5.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$5.00
$5.00*
MISC EXPENSES
$20.00
$20.00
BOND REFUND C8883
$000.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C7617
POSTAGE METER ADV DEPOSIT
$3 ,000.00
$580.00
$3,000.&'
$580.0.
POSTAGE STAMPS 100 BOOKS
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND 09285
$50.00
$$50.00
BOND REFUND C9048
550.00
$
$50.00
BOND REFUND 08426
$624.00
$624.00
RESIDENT TR TAX REBATE
$8
$8x175.47
FACILITIES PLAN
$17050.4070
BOND REFUND C8750
$100.00
BOND REFUND 08917
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
�1REPORT
ACCOUNTS
ATEAPPROVAL
PAYMENAPAYABLE
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
$100.00
BOND REFUND 09169
$75.00
$375.00
BOND REFUND C9330
$4.76
REFUND FINAL BILL
$.48
$5.24
I{ANU SHAH
REFUND FINAL BILL
$33.00
STATE OF ILLINOIS
LIQUOR APP RECORD CK
LIQUOR APP RECORD CTS
99.00
$ 00.00
$132.00*
$ 100.00
JOAN ANN F. SWIERK
BOND REFUND 08967
BOND REFUND C9274
$50.00
$2,100.00
$50.00
TOM TERZIC
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
BOND MONEY
BOND MONEY
$850.00
$1,650.00
r
BOND MONEY
$2x420.00
$7x020.00*
BOND MONEY
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$$14.15
$14.65
160.80
$100.00
JIM TOOMBS
REFUND FINAL WATER. BILL
$$60.00
$
TRAPANI CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND 09209
REFUND FINAL BILL
$$6.1
66.92
$25.00*
HECTOR VAZQUEZ
REFUND FINAL BILI.
$255.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PMT ACCT 8121200
REINSPECTION FEE 04698
$25.00
$50.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE 06073
$275.00
REINSPECTION FEE 06829
$25,00
REINSPECTION FEE C8043
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE 08426
$30.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8883
$25,00
REINSPECTION FEE C8945
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE 08977
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C8998
$15.00
REINSPECTION FEE 09225
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9274
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C9330
$100.00
$720.00
AMB PMT NICOLE KELLY
$127.60
$127.60
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT_
ALARM SYSTEM CABLE
BOND REFUND C9271
$100.00
$475.00
$100.00
VILLAGE SEWER
BOND REFUND C4698
$720.00
WOLF POINT REALTY
BOND REFUND C4698A
$490.00
BOND REFUND C4698B
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
$144.00
$1,829.40
BOND REFUND C5654
AL ZA3AC
REFUND FINAL BILL
REFUND FINAL BILL
.
$99.52 52
$14.4$
***TOTAL**
$738,667.57
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
$480,196.32 COMMUNITY,DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$1,356.78
$
GENERAL FUND
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$80,882.61 WATER & SEWER FUND
$888.67 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$1,000.07
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
BUILDING CONST
$2,600.00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT
CONST 1985
$17,133.97
$43,755.63
POLICE & FIRE
POLICE PENSION FUND
$42,349.07 FIREMEN'S PENSION
FUND
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$21,566.85
********************************************************************************************************
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
$99.00
$99.00
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
AD-FLLM YRTHE
ESFLAG
G
$3.97
CPI PHOTO FINISH
FILM PROCESSING
$4.16
$4.16
$12.29
FILM PROCESSING
$2,800.00
$2,804.00*
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
HOMETOWN DAYS RIDES
FORMER TRUSTEE DINNER
$1,066.95
$1,066.95*
$58.94*
OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$58.94
$21905.00
$2,905.00
WINDSOR PUBLICATIONS, INC.
HISTORY BOOKS
***TOTAL**
$6,942.3,..
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
$6,942.18
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT .
PAGE 6
ACCOUNPAYMENABLE APPROVAL REPORT
7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
$399`40
ARNSTEIN & LEHRLEGAL
LEGAL SERVICES
SERVICES
$131`25
$145'40
LEGAL SERVICES
$778.65
LEGAL SERVICES
$1,835.94
LEGAL SERVICES
$8.5
LEGAL SERVICES
$84033.005
LEGAL SERVICES
$315'00
LEGAL SERVICES
$3, 44
LEGAL SERVICES
$110505..00
LEGAL SERVICES
$168`00
LEGAL SERVICES
$355.50
$9,162.54
LEGAL SERVICES
$289.40
CHICAGO TRIBUNE
EMP AD
EMP AD
$493.00
$340.00
EMP AD
$408.00
EMP AD
$391.0400
EMP AD
$208.
$ 2 329.00
'282.00
EMP AD
$300.00
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
LY H
PHYSICAL-KOLB
REGISTER JEPSON, WIDMER
$300.00
$30.20
$30.20
ILLINOIS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
$327.72
$327.72
RONALD W. PAVLOCK
CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$31.27
$100.00
$131.27*
PETTY
MISC EXPENSES
$573.50
$573.50
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
SERVICES RENDERED
$83,00
$83.00
XEROX CORP.
TONER
***TOTAL**
$13,219.'`
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
$13,219.19
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
7/31191
PAYMENT DATE
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
LARRY CULTON
LARRY
COMM ASST BD MTG
COMM ASST ZNG BD APPEALS
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
CODIXON
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
MICE AGREEMENT
SERVICE PHONE SYSTEM
$1,239.$4
$200.00
$1,439.$4
MARISHA JASON
COMM ASST JULY 4TH PARADE
$30.00
$25.00
$30.00
$25.00
JOHN KEANE
JOHN KN
COMM ASST BD MTG
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
A. MILLER
SUSAN MUELLER
MUELLERRAJCZYK
COMM ASST ZNG BD APPEALS
$25.00
$25.00
$25.0r
$25:0t
APRIL
COMM ASST BD MTG
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
JERRY RAJCZYK
COMM ASST ZNG BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
JONNA SHOUB
FRANK SMITH
COMM ASST JULY 4TH PARADE
$30.002
$ 5.00
$55.00
COMM ASST COW MTG
***TOTAL**
$1,724.84
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
$1,724.84
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
PAPER
.30-
$220505.40
$124.10
I.B.M. CORPORATION
PAPER
MICE DISPLAY STATIONS
$210.00
$115.00
$210.00
$115.'
ILLINOIS CPA SOCIETY
ANNUAL DUES WIDMER
MEMBERSHIP DUES CRISWELL
$25.00
$25•
ILLINOIS GMIS CHAPTER
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$6.32
$9.34
$15.66*
MISC EXPENSES
PERMIT #4 DEPOSIT
$ 10.00
$10.00*
POSTMASTER
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$60.33
$80.99
$141.32
ENVELOPES
$193.00
$193.00
SENTRY ENVELOPE CO.
USAGE 1048 COPIER
$215.00
XEROX CORP.
LEGAL PAGE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
LEGAL PAGE
PAGE 8
LEGAL PAGE
ACCOUNTS REPORT
LEGAL
$60`66
LEGAL
DATEAPPROVAL
PAY14ENTPAYABLE
7/31/91
LEGAL
$65.93
LEGAL
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
LEGAL
$63.30
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
$83.00
$298.00
TONER
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$13.04
XL%DATACOMP INC.
***TOTAL**
$1,145.12
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
$1,145.12
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
$525.00
$240.00
CERTIFIED SURVEY CO.
INSURANCE CO.
RECORDING EXPENSES
EASEMENTS FIRE POLICE BLDG
$$45.00
$45'00
$$45.00
$45`00
CHICAGO TITLE
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
IL MUNICIPAL HANDBOOK
SUPPLIES
$184.01
$184.01
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SERVICE
OFFICE
DELIVERY
$20.90
$24.90
$45.80
ON TIME MESSENGER
DELIVERY
$68.57
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
LEGAL PAGE
$68.57
LEGAL PAGE
$60.66
$63'30
LEGAL PAGE
$.90
LEGAL PAGE
$6633'30
LEGAL
$60`66
LEGAL
$63`30
LEGAL
$65.93
LEGAL
$68. 57
LEGAL
$65`3933
LEGAL
LEGAL
$63.30
LEGAL
***TOTAL**
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
$841.32
$1,881.13
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $1,881.13
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
ADELLE GORE
HMO ILLINOIS
TONY HUEMANN
ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF EMPL SEC.
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
NORTHWEST ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY
NORTHWEST PHYSICAL THERAPY
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
THERESA SPRENGEL
STASICA ASSOCIATES
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
AUGUST ADMIN FEES
AUG EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM
$3,777.12
$9,292.38
MED CLAIMS THRU 715/91
119
$19,314.26
$43,231.13
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU
MED CLAIMS THRU 7/29/91
$24,919.17
$2,105.11
LIFE INSURANCE AUG9
$46.00
SERVICE FEES JUNE
$84'86
REIMBURSEMENT
HLTH INSURANCE AUGUST
$7,449.97
REIMBURSEMENT
$65.00
$810.00
MEDINA UNEMPL BENEFITS
$138.40
9001630307-X HUEMANN
$90.00
SERVICES RENDERED RILEY
SERVICES RENDERED RILEY
$177.00
SERVICES BOESCHE
$21.00
$2828 50
SERVICES WISNIEWSKI
00
$77.00
PROF LIAB INS REIMB
HLTH BENEFITS CONSULTATION
$
***TOTAL**
$111,911.90
*
$100,534.06*
$2,105.11
$46.00
$84.86*
$7,449.97
$65.00
$810.00
$138.40
$90.00
$177.00
$49.50
$77.00
$285.00
$111,911.90
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIA PUBLICATION $5.00
0 $29.54
$775.0
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL SERVICES
POLICE DEPARTMENT
REIMB BUSINESS CARDS $28.00 $28.00
TED ADAMCZYK SUPPLIES $119-18
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
PEST CONTROL
$260.00
$260.00
SERVICES
$260.00
$855.00
SERVICES
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$334.65
$334.65
$5.99
ASTM$5.99
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
OF ELECTRICAL
VEHICLE WASH JUNE 91
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
$30.00
$347.50
$30.00
$347.50
INT. ASSOC.
NATIONAL FIRE PRCT. ASSOC.
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$31.85
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$9.33
$18.04
MISC EXPENSES
$13.00$11.57
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$16.45
$68.39*
MATERIAL CONSULTANTS, I
MISC EXPENSES STRUCTION
SUNSET RD RECON
$418.50
$171.30
$418.50
$171.30
SOIL &
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$5.00
$5.00
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
SERVICE CONTRACT
$133.00
XEROX CORP.
MICE AGREEMENT 2510 COPIER
$68.75
$150.00
MTCE AGREEMENT 1035 COPIER
$215.00
USAGE 1048 COPIER
$83.00
$649.75
TONER
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$13.04
$13.04
XL/DATACOMP INC.
***TOTAL**
$2,960.47
INSPECTION SERVICES
$2,541.97 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$418.50
GENERAL FUND
POLICE DEPARTMENT
REIMB BUSINESS CARDS $28.00 $28.00
TED ADAMCZYK SUPPLIES $119-18
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PARTS
$216.92
$3.40
$339.50
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
PARTS
SERVICE
$388.37
$30.05
$388.37
$30.05
JOSEPH BELMONTE
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
EXPENSES
PARTS
$227.57
$2$9.03 .53
.10
$4$9.03
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
PARTS
BH66-JT-5422-A
COMPUTER INFO SERVICE
$10.00
$10.0y
COMFUSERVE, INC
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS,IN
ANNUAL FEE
$125.00
$125.00
$189.
$125.00
D & B BUSINESS EDUCATION SERV.
TUITION KOLANOWSKI
$238.08
$238.08
THOMAS F. DALEY
FEDERAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
EXPENSES
RAINING GOY,CONDON
$.00
$24.92
$24
$376.00*
FRIES AUTO INC.
GAS
$21.75
GAS
42
$23.05
GAS
$2.
GAS
.60
$25560
GAS
01
$3
$223..00
GAS
GAS
$.0
GAS
$2244.330
GAS
$16.25
GAS
$13.00
GAS
$
.38
$222238
GAS
$12.25
GAS
$25.75
GAS
GAS
1.40
$21.40
$327.1
GOULD PUBLICATIONS
SLIDE RULES
$82.00
$234.01
$82.(
$234.01
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
MTCE & COPIES
RIBBON CARTRIDGES
$162.00
$162.00
HEWLETT PACARD COMPANY
SERVICE
$37 83
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$135.14
$826.56
$203.60
$826.56
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
MTCE AGREEMENT
PUBLICATION
$74.60
$74.60
INVESTIGATIONS INSTITUTE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
$695.00
$695.00
1 YR SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$14.70
L.E. NET INC.
LATTOF CHEVROLET,
PARTS
PARTS
$36.26
$56.17
PARTS
$318.21
PARTS
$113.08
PARTS
$35.46
PARTS
$14.08
PARTS
$34.05
PARTS
$96.11
$718.12
PARTS
$93.00
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
BATTERIES
FILM
$453.50
$39-84
$546.50
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
OF
OFFFICE CE SSUPPUPPLLIESES
$39.84
$39.84$39.84
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$159.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$51.40
$51.40
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
MICE SUPPLIES
PARTS
.20
$$67695.00
$67.20
$695.00
LEE AUTO PARTS
mOTRA TRANSMISSIONS
RANSMISSION
REBUILT T PHOTOS
PHOTOS
$161.50
$161.50
$1,500-00
EDWARD NASTEK POLICE ALARM
ILLINOIS
REIMS
ASSESSMENT EMERGENCY SVCS
5.95
$5.95
NORTHERN
ERS INC.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
23621 WITHEY RENEWAL FEE
$1$3.00
$13.00
$26.00
NOTARIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLINO
26503 DIBLASI RENEWAL FEE
$1,477.47
RAY O'HERRON CO-, INC-
LIGHT BARS
LIGHT BARS
$846.85
$98.56
$2,422.88�
OVERHEAD SHIELD MOUNT
$22.00
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$2.00
$85.00
MISC EXPENSES
$19.26
MISC EXPENSES
$30.00
MISC EXPENSES
$4.95
$163.21*
MISC EXPENSES
$775-00
RADIO REPAIRS
$1,338A0
$2,113.00
ERIC E. PIEE
RADIO REPAIRS
$344.00
$344.00
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
STRAYS JUNE 91
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
PRYOR RESOURCES, INC.
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SAVE -A -PET
SMITH & WESSON ACADEMY
WIPECO INC
XL/DATACOMP INC.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7131/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
TUITION RICHARDSON
$195.00
$195.00
SUPPLIES
$80.01
$32.86
SUPPLIES
$80.01
SERVICE
EXTINGUISHER REPAIRS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$80.01
$80.01
$320.04
PARTS
$35.28
SERVICE
PARTS
$13.08
$4.71
$53.0-
53. -TRANSFER
PARTS
TRANSFERLISTING
$551.20
$551.2`
CLEAN & SVCE PARTS WASHER
$330.25
$175.00
$330.25
$175.00
STRAYS JUNE 91
TUITION-LEE,ADAMCZYK
$950.00
$950.00
SUPPLIES
$309.00
$309.00
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$65.20
$65.20
***TOTAL** $16,667.64
$15,892.64 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $775.00
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ABLE FIRE SAFETY EQUIP
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
AMERICAN ANIMATION INC
AT&T
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
EHRHARDT'S TRAILER SALES, INC
HYDROCARBON EMULSIFIER
$1,160.00
CHEMICAL SUPPLIES
$3,800.00
SUPPLIES
$32.86
OVERHEAD ANIMATION KIT
$4.57
1.34
SERVICE
EXTINGUISHER REPAIRS
$122.75
SUPPLIES
$35.36
SUPPLIES
$94.56
SERVICE
$175.67
SIDE DOOR JELOSIE'
$31.50
$4,960.c
$32A
$4.57
$1.34
$252.67
$175.67
$31.50
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
H R HART PHOTO
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE SAFETY ALLIANCE
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
LONNIE JACKSON
LAKE -COOK FARM SUPPLY COMPANY
LEATHERMAN
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
mAC'S FIRE AND SAFETY, INC.
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
PENNWELL BOOKS
PHYSIO -CONTROL
QUALEX, INC.
RAND SOCIETY AOF
TIUIP.
FIRE PROTECTION
SULLIVAN PRESS
RANDY UIDL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 14
ACCOUNPAAY14EENNTBDDEATEAP7/331/91REPORT
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BADGES
$35.
$$26.55 11
$$24162 .90
WIG WAG FLASHER KIT
$24.80
$24.90
PHOTO SUPPLIES86.88
$
PLYWOOD LUMBER
$1922.814
SERVICE
$75,08
SERVICE
$37.82
SERVICE
$460.56
SERVICE
SERVICE
$25.39
$20.75
$811.74
SERVICE$250,00
'TICKETS FIRE PREY LUNCH
$826.56
$250.00
$826.56
MTCE AGREEMENT
$163.20
$163.20
EXPENSES
$45.00
$45.00
LABOR.98
19.98
TOOLS.
$24.49
$24.49
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$2.48
$2.48
REPAIRS.60
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
$94.68
56.60
$94.68
PUBLICATION
$615.40
$615.40
BATTERIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$183.40
$137.60
$321.00
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$135.98
$135.98
OFFICE TRUCK
$120.00
$120.00
DUES 1991-1992
INSPECTION FORMS
$519.00
$$22.00
$1,141.00
INSPECTION FORMS
$30.00
$30.00
EXPENSES
***TOTAL**
$10,390.9
$10,271,22 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND
$119.74
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31191
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SVCS RENDERED AUGUST $27,410.00 $27,410.00
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $27,410.00
GENERAL FUND $27,410.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
A.D.D. WAREHOUSE
PUBLICATION
$16.50
$16.50
AMERICAN GUIDANCE SERVICE,INC.
PUBLICATION
$135.80
$135.80
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$861.05
$861.05
ARAfCORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
COFFEE SUPPLIES
$242.00
$242.00
ARIZZONA KIDNEY FOUNDATION
PUBLICATIONS
$10.00
$10.00
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$38.05
$38.05
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$39.91
$39.91
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
MICE AGREEMENT
$413.28
$413.28
MORNING GLORY PRESS
PUBLICATION
$5.95
$5.95
THE NATIONAL COUNCIL ON THE AG
BROCHURES
$5.20
$5.20
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$33.18
MISC EXPENSES
$73.20
$106.38*
SCM CORPORATION
REPAIRS
$75.00
$75.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,949.12
GENERAL FUND
$1,949.12
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
DATED BOOKS APPT BOOKS $37.25 $37.25
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 16
ACCOUNPAYMENTBDATEAP7/31/91PROVAL REPORT
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VENDOR
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
$1,000.00
$1,000.00
GOLDEN CORRIDOR
A1C ENG.,INC
MEMBERSHIP
50% SUBSIDY 1705 RUSTY DR
1 251.25
$ $150.00
$1,251.25
$150,00
GOLDEN SEAL HTG &
GEORGE GRIVAS ASSOCIATES, LTD.
SERVICES CRENDERED
D DR BATE
$5,616.31
$5,616.31
ANTHONY J. IZZO
INC.
DBG CONCRETE & WINDOWS
$13,560.00
$1 500-00
$15$060.00
K.A.M. CONSTRUCTION,
FINAL PMT 213 N RUSSEL
$125.00
125.00
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SERVICES RENDERED
LEGAL PAGE
$34.28
$34.2E?
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
***TOTAL**
$23,274.09
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
$6,653.56 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$16,620.53
GENERAL FUND
*+w+www+**ww++*ww+++ww*w++ww*www*+wwwww+ww++ww+ww+w+wwww+wwwwwwww*ww*ww**+*ww***+**twwwww**w+***********
STREET DIVISION
$91.35
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLICREDITESUPPLIES
$$3.16-
$41.7670
$ 49,95
SUPPLIES
$11.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$302.20
$ 2.
SUPPLIES
22 0055
$22.05
$2
PARTS
87.32
PARTS$149.56$
PARTS
$9.70
$
$775.11
MTCE SUPPLIES
$345.50
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
MATERIAL
MATERIAL
$275.40
$115.50
MATERIAL
$ 761.64
$1$41.12
MATERIAL
$41.02
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
SUPPLIES
MICE SUPPLIES
$104,33
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
ATLAS BOBCAT INC.
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
BUSSE HARDWARE
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
CADE INDUSTRIES
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
CLARKE IND.
FRANK CLESEN AND SONS, INC.
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
DEAN'S CONCRETE SPECIALTIES, I
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MICE SUPPLIES
SUNSET RD RECONSTRUCTION
$18.90
$125.49
$123.23
$1$086.58
MICE SUPPLIES
$
125.49
PARTS
$30.11
$178.58
PARTS
PARTS
$73.09
PARTS
$227.52
$150.05
PARTS
PARTS
$34.68
PARTS
$22.50
$716.53
MICE SUPPLIES
$145.68
$60.00
$205.68
MTCE SUPPLIES
CLND PUSHBUTTON CONTACTS
$54.00
$56.00
MISC HDWR SUPPLIES
$
$38.02
$102.06
SUPPLIES
VEHICLE WASH JUNE 91
$52.00 46.00
$46.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$52.50
$
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$137.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$137.50
$137.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$1.37.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$137 50
$$78227.. 50
$1,104.50
CLEANING SUPPLIES
02-14-146-02
.88
$78.88
MTCE SUPPLIES
$211.35
$115.30
$211.35
$115.30
FLOWERS
2 WHEELBARROWS
$187.30
$240.40
$427.
FLOW METER
JANITORIAL SERVICE
$2$171.49 6.00
76.00
$2$171.49
BF80-JT-17006
$189.23
$189.23
ANNUAL FEE
MTCE SUPPLIES
$172.50
$172.50
SUPPLIES
$10.98
$4.98
$15.96
SUPPLIES
$28.20
$28.20
CONCRETE SLAB
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNPAYMENABDATEAPPRO AL REPORT
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION-
$30.00
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
$100.00
$22,20SUPPLIES
$100.00
ELGIN SUPER AUTO PARTS, INC.
$35,49
FINISHMASTER, INC.
SUPPLIES
$35,40
SUPPLIES
$11,40
SUPPLIES
$83.22
SUPPLIES
$33,79
SUPPLIES
$85,67
$307.1(
SUPPLIES
$83,60
$83.60
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC-
CHICAGO
TAPE
UNIFORM SERVICE
$151.75
$147.75
G & K SE NORTH
UNIFORM SERVICE
$147,75
$447.25
UNIFORM SERVICE
$100,00
$100.00
ADVANCE U OF I LANDSCAPE
$145.70
$145.70
JOE GATTAS
GNB, INCORPORATED
BATTERIES
TIRES
$91,96
$49,00
$140,96
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
FRONT END ALIGNMENT50.00
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$2,450.78
$2,050.78
FRANK GUERRERO
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
$$44.22
$151.72
H & H ELECTRIC CO.
HOME CENTER
SUPPLIES
$44.22
HANDY ANDY
ITEC
MTCE SUPPLIES
REFUSE DISPOSAL JUNE 91
$330.00
$330.00
$660.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL JUNE 91
$21245.00
$2,245.00
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
CAR RENTALS
PARTS
$81.98
$47.06
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS
$42.00
PARTS
$187.74
PARTS
$130.52
PARTS
$107.21
PARTS
$21.41
PARTS
$1.91
PARTS
$32.24
PARTS
$91.00
PARTS
$39.00
PARTS
$39,00
$821.07
PARTS
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
LEE AUTO PARTS
MATERIAL SYSTEMS INC.
MEYER MATERIAL Cb.
MIDWAY TRUCK PARTS
MONROE TRUCK EQUIPMENT, INC.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWESTERN DRAWING
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
P & W INDUSTRIAL SALES, INC.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$100.95
$19.30
$120.25
SUPPLIES
.27
$$3.91
PARTS
$
PARTS
$88<.0202
$27.20
PARTS
SHELVING MATERIALS
$184.20
$184.20
MATERIAL
LIMESTONE SCREENINGS
$581'72
$698.60
$1,280.33
P ARTS
$18.83
$104.96
$123.79
PARTS
$86.73
$86.73
SUPPLIES
ALTERNATOR REPAIR
$45.00
$12.00
$57.00
STARTER REPAIR
FRAMES & GRATES
$2,320.00
$439.76
$2,320.00
$439.76
1830 E KENSINGTON
$17.51
$17.51
FOAM BOARD
$8
CREDIT SUPPLIES
$ 6.73
SUPPLIES
$17.06
$19.93
SUPPLIES
$11
SUPPLIES
$ 0.76
SUPPLIES
$82.36
$82.36
$634.48
SUPPLIES
$29.20
MICE SUPPLIES
75.16
$21.42
MICE SUPPLIES
$46.
MICE SUPPLIES
86
$ .86
$172.64
MTCE SUPPLIES
$1 5
47.2
*
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$79.84
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$5.80
$$.79
F
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
.05
$$6 11.19
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$443.503.50
$361.02*
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
PARTS
$558080'.8080
SUPPLIES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
PARTS
$25.42
PARTS
$110.63
PARTS
$61-76
PARTS
$101.74
$254.62
$1,151.43
PARTS
SUPPLIES
$85.49
$85.49
PROSAFETY
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
PARTS
$3M9
$21.44
PARTS
PARTS
$12.92
PARTS
$9.00
PARTS
$33.53
PARTS
$17.22
PARTS
$9.54
PARTS
$14.29
$15.88
$164.61
RECYCLING CONFERENCE
PARTS
REGISTER ANGELL
$100.00
$29.29
$100.00*
$29.29
RODALE BOOKS
ROWLAND'S EQUIPMENT, INC.
PUBLICATIONS
LEAF MULCHER PLATE
12.70
$77.46
$77.46
$90.16
MICE SUPPLIES
40.00
$.00
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
$ 40
JULY PEST CONTROL
$40.00
$40.00
JULY PEST CONTROL
$40.00
JULY PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
$40.00
$240.00
SPRING ALIGN
MTCE SUPPLIES
$390.32
$10.99
$390.32
$10.99$165.00
STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY
SUBURBAN TRIM & GLASS CO.
PLBG SUPPLIES
REPAIR BENCH SEAT
$300.00
$165.(
$300.6-
TECH SYN CORPORATION
HYDRAULIC HOSE
$7.14
$7.14
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION, INC-
HOLESAW
1991 RESURFACING PROGRAM
$66,858.80
$22,165.70
1991 RESURFACING PROGRAM
$99:613.89
1991 RESURFACING PROGRAM
1991 RESURFACING PROGRAM
$12,773.00
$201,411.39
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
REGISTER GATTAS
CHIPPER BLADES SHARPENED
$20.00
$34.00
$20.00*
$34.00
VALIQUET INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 21
ACCOUNTSPAYMENT PAYABLDAE APPROVAL REPORT
TE 7/31/91
PURCHASE.DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
$369.52
$369.52
VAN DOORN ROOFING, INC.
ROOF INSPECTION FEE
ANTENNAS
$74.50
$74.50
VHF COMMUNICATIONS INC.
STOP SIGNS
$1,648.00
$475.00
$2,123.00$149.94
VULCAN SIGN
SUPPLIES
$149.94
WEARGUARD
UNIFORM SHIRTS
SUPPLIES
$97.00
$173.00
$270.00
WIPECO INC
SUPPLIES
$94.00
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
SERVICE
SERVICE
$94.00
$94.00
SERVICE
$94.00
$$42.00
SERVICE
RUSTPROOF & SEALANT
$48.08
$42376.00
.25
ZIEBART
IST AYD CORPORATION
PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS
PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS
$48.08
PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS
$49.07$48.07
$192.30
PAPER TOWEL DISPENSERS
***TOTAL**
$228,246.43
STREET DIVISION
$59,722.96 MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND
$168,523.47
GENERAL FUND
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
$41.45
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$8.08
$44.00
SUPPLIES
$98.84
SUPPLIES
$42.59
SUPPLIES
$46.08
$281.04
SUPPLIES
$11
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$147.70
.58
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
CADE INDUSTRIES
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANALYSIS,IN
R. L. CORTY & COMPANY
DUPAGE TOPSOIL INC.
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FINISHMASTER, INC.
FRIES AUTO INC.
G & K SERVICES NORTH CHICAGO
GNB, INCORPORATED
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
GRAYBAR ELECTRIC CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
MATERIAL
FILM PROCESSING
MICE CONTRACT
PARTS
PARTS
MTCE SUPPLIES
MICE SUPPLIES
VEHICLE WASH JUNE 91
CLEANING SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
BJ80-JT-23598
BH67-JT-1310-A
ANNUAL FEE
MTCE SUPPLIES
TOP SOIL
MTCE SUPPLIES
DELIVERY
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
TOW CHARGE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
BATTERIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$192.58
$22.05
$146.98
$149.55
$363.00
$46.33
$550.00
$178.58
$227.53
$60.00
$151.08
$44.50
$342.00
$52.00
$33.00
$3,866.97
$235.03
$189.24
$172.50
$420.00
$45.00
$55.00
$35.49
$85.67
$65.00
$151.75
$147.75
$147.75
$291.40
$361.50
$466.35
$68.45
$370.60
$163.65
$76.25
$112.15
PAGE 22
TOTAL
$670.44
$363.00
$46.33
$550.00
$406.11
$211.08
$44.50
$394.00
$33.00
$3,866.97
$235.03
$189.24
$172.50
$420.00
$45.00
$55.00
$121.16
$65.00
$447.:
$291.4u
$361.50
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
DON HANSEN
HOSKINS CHEVROLET, INC.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
INDUSTRIAL LADDER & SUPPLY CO.
LAND AND LAKES CO
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LCOMP INC.
LEE ENGINEERING SALES
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS
CO.
& OFFIC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23
ACCOUNTSPAYMENT PAYABLDAE TE 7/APPR31/91OVAL REPORT
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$201.00
$1,458.45
SUPPLIES
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$48.02 $59.
06
$48.02
$59.06
MTCE SUPPLIES
$115.37
$115.37
MTCE SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$203.83
SERVICE
$533.12
SERVICE
$37.04
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$61.25
SERVICE
$97.32
SERVICE
$31.68
SERVICE
$18.66
SERVICE
$17.00
SERVICE
$25.77
SERVICE
$19.80
SERVICE
$18.98
SERVICE
$56.13
SERVICE
$17.22
$1,229.69
SERVICE
$826.56
$826.56
MTCE AGREEMENT
$183.90
$183.90
LADDER
$594.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$594.00
$1,188.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$1,475.00
$1,475.00
CAR RENTALS
$195.00
PARTS
$8.02
PARTS
$21.61
PARTS
$52.00
PARTS
$52.00
PARTS
$52,00
$380.63
PARTS
$184:48
$184.48
MTCE SUPPLIES
$2,409.99
$2,409.99
EQUIPMENT
$188.22
$188.22
MTCE SUPPLIES
$241.30
$241.30
SUPPLIES
$108.96
OFFICE SUPPLIES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS REPORT
DATEAPPROVAL
PAYM NTPAYABLE
7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$20'29
$219.40
$348.65
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$71.44
LEE AUTO PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
$103.77
$86,72
$175.21
$ .81
MATERIAL CO.
MEYER M
EQUIPMENT, INC.
MATERIAL
SUPPLIES
$.72
$$6
$150.00
$86.81
$86
$150.00
MONROE TRUCK
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
STARTER REBUILD
REPLACE FLYWHEEL
$87.00
$87.00
MOTRA TRANSMISSIONS
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L
SAFETY
SAMPLES TESTED
$$2.00
$137.50
137$82.00
$137.50
NET MIDWEST, INC,
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO-
NSE KENSINGTON lE RAND
AVE
$16.67
$22.18
$3$.$5
112 E HIGHLAND
$63.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$109.00
$12.08
$184.08
SUPPLIES
$161'86
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$4827.50
.6$
$ 238.04
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$12.23
$11
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$27.91
$9.69
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$9.96
$
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$26.42
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$22.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$$2.41
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$205.77*
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$13.36
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
PARTS
$278,38
$296.04
PARTS
$25.79
PARTS
$19.60
PARTS
$547.59
PARTS
$158.23
PARTS
$38.61
PARTS
$15.84 -
CREDIT PARTS
$18.79
$1,380.55
PARTS
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
PORTABLE TOOL SALES
POSTMASTER
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
RAINBOW1 HR PHOTO EXP.
ROSEMONT BUILDING & SUPPLY CO.
ROSEMONT GARDENS INC.
RTP - SUBURBAN
LAURA SCHULTZ
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO. OF AMERICA
STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY
P. R. STREICH & SONS,
INC.
SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TRITON COLLEGE
VAN DOORN ROOFING, INC.
WEARGUARD
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
WIPECO INC
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 25
ACCOUNTSPAYMENT PAYABLEDATE APPROVAL REPORT
7/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MTCE SUPPLIES
$63.00
$562.29
$63.00
$562.29-
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$ 30.79
PARTS
$35.69
PARTS
.91
$123.52
PARTS
$3
PARTS
$17.22
PARTS
$9.54
PARTS
$15.88
PARTS
$11.24
PARTS
$58.70
$58.70
METER CARDS
$21.16
FILM PROCESSING
$148.10
FILM & PROCESSING
$20.38
$189.64
FILM PROCESSING
$97.50
$97.50
PRECAST CATCH BASIN
$47.50
$47.50
SOD
MICE AGREEMENT
$597.75
$21.00
$618.75
MICE AGREEMENT
FIRE HYDRANTS PAINTED
$229.50
$315.46
$229.50
$315.46
MICE SUPPLIES
$309.30
$309.30
SUPPLIES
$35.99
$35.99
PLBG SUPPLIES
$148.00
$148.00
REPAIRS
$28467.70
$28400
MICE SUPPLIES
$
$67.70.00
RUNNING GEAR
REG JONES DOWD STEINMILLER
$361.50
$49.19
$361.50*
ROOF INSPECTION FEE
$69.83
ROOF INSPECTION FEE
$96.13
ROOF INSPECTION FEE
$49.19
ROOF INSPECTION FEE
$17.01
ROOF INSPECTION FEE
$133.09
$414.44
ROOF INSPECTION FEE
$149.93
$149.93
UNIFORM SHIRTS
$8,5.00
$85.00
REPAIR FUEL TANK
$309.00
SUPPLIES
$97.00
$406.00
SUPPLIES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 731191
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS FITTINGS $272.00 $272.00
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ***TOTAL** $27,669.39
WATER & SEWER FUND $27,669.39
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH66-JT-0498-A
BH66-JT-3710-A
$22.72
$9.03
$7,412.50
REHRIG PACIFIC CO.
BH66-JT-5262-A
$142.83
$4,560.38
$5,490.04
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
BH66-JT-5266-C
$177.00
$22.72
$374.30
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BH68-JT-7498-A
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
$35.36
$94.00
$35.36
$94.00
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
SERVICE
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$503.66
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$503.66
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
MIDWEST DECAL
RECYCLING DECALS
YARD MATERIAL DECALS
$2,823.00
$4,589.50
$7,412.50
REHRIG PACIFIC CO.
RECYCLING BINS
$4,560.38
$5,490.04
$4,560.38
$5,490.04
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN
EQUITY CHARGE
***TOTAL**
$17,462.92
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 27
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7131%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
GENERAL FUND
$17x462.92
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
A.B.T. APPLIANCE
AIR CONDITIONERS
$818.00
$17'14
$818.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$45'17
SUPPLIES
$7`56
$86.37
$156.24
SUPPLIES
BRICK WORK
$1,600.00
$1,600.00
JAMES W. BOESCHE
EQUIPMENT
$$92.00
$$92.00
CECO DOOR DIVISION
CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HODS
DRYWALLIPLASTIC BEAD
340.40
$$340.00
$92.40
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO.
TITLE INNSURANCE
TITLE INSURANCE
$680.00
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
AUG RENT
61x974.32
$425 81
$1,
$61x974.32
$1,425.81*
THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF M.P.
SECURITY DEP
PAINTING 101 S MAPLE
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
RANDY HAGGERMAKER
SUPPLIES
$31'20
HELLER LUMBER CO.
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$ 105.47
$4336
$43'36
SUPPLIES
$56.87
$304.84
SUPPLIES
$41'25
HELM, INC.
MANUALS
MANUALS
$41'25
$36.00
$118.50
MANUALS
$33'38
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$20'16
SUPPLIES
$12'57
$48.15
SUPPLIES
$28.97
$143.23
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
SUPPLIES
SLEEVES AIR SHUTTERS VENTS
$119.00
$5'55
$119.00
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$18.94 -
SUPPLIES
$46`80
$143'25
SUPPLIES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 28
ACCOUNPAYMENABLE APPROVALREPORT
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
SUPPLIES
$165`25
$187'40
SUPPLIES
$9.45
SUPPLIES
$116.30
SUPPLIES
$105.75
SUPPLIES
$79.83
$ 79
SUPPLIES
$7.75
SUPPLIES
$7.40
$
SUPPLIES
$133.82
6.82
$6`90
$
SUPPLIES
$23`75
SUPPLIES
$3.45
$1,029.11
INDUSTRIES, INC.
SUPPLIES
P-17 SQUAD CONVERSION
$973'29
$424.75
$1,898.04
LUND
P-1 SQUAD CONVERSION
$208.67-
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$241.70
$206.58
SUPPLIES
$57,42
SUPPLIES
$84,31
SUPPLIES
$178.20
SUPPLIES
$48,74
SUPPLIES
$14,64
SUPPLIES
$251.66
SUPPLIES
$62.55
$937.13
SUPPLIES
$32,967,48
$32,967.98
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
SERVICES
ICE RENDERED
END REDRED
$1,400.00
$1,400,00
THE SIGN PALACE
POLICE CARS LETTERED
$1,400.00
POLICE CARS LETTERED
$1,400,00
$5,600.
POLICE CARS LETTERED
$2,362.50
$2,362.50
BARRY A. SPRINGER
TIF LEGAL FEES JUNE
B OILER INSPECTION
OI-STUDY
$15=00
$3,833.22
$15.00
$3,833.22
STATE OF ILLINOIS
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
RSTPHAREHAREROOF & SEALANT
UUS
$179.00
$179.00
ZIEBART
***TOTAL**
$118,404.32
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 29
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31%91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND $36,801.20 VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND $7,795.54
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
MPROVCONST
EMENTFUND 1991 $3,042.50 POLICE & FIRE BUILDING CONST $69,265.08
DOWN
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
SUPPLIES
$5.91
$13.73
$19.
SUPPLIES
BG21-JT-1838-A
$65.59
$9.03
$74.62
BH67-JT-3858-B
$393.75
3.75
$3$2.60
INSTALL BANNERS
70
SUPPLIES
EXPLORER CARNIVAL DETAIL
$1,083.75
$10.34
$1,083.75
$10.34
PARTS
PLBG SUPPLIES
.
$7755.00 00
$9.27
$75.00
MAGNETIC MATERIAL
BARRICADES JULY 4TH
$507.00
$171.00
$507.00
$171.00
SERVICE
$2,346.97
***TOTAL** $2,346.97
********************************************************************************************************
i
t
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLOOD LOAN PRIN /1/ 11 $3$433.702 $3,643.73
FLOOD LOAN INT 7 1 1
***TOTAL** $3,643.73
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 30
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/41
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $3,643.73
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $1,356,421.63
DATE RUN 7/31/91
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 31
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID-APPBAR
TIME RUN 11.14.40
SUMMARY BY FUND 7/31/91
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$653,003.87
$36,801.20
21
FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND
$168,941.97
22
23
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$18,558.21
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$80,882.61
41
46
WATER & SEWER FUND
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$74,026.16
$1,392.33
48
VEHICLE REPLACEMENT FUND
$7,795.54
$111,911.90
49
51
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$3,394.74
53
POLICE & FIRE BUILDING CONST
1985
$71,865.08
$17,133.97
55
56
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991
$3,042.50
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$42,349.07
$43,755.63
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$21,566.85
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,356,421.63
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEYmm�/'/"7r
RE: CREATION OF A CLASS "P" LIQUOR LICENSE
FOR CONVENIENT FOOD STORE
DATE: JULY 9, 1991
Pursuant to the authority vested in me as President of the Village
of Mount Prospect and Liquor Commissioner, and following
considerable reflection and analysis, in addition to weighing
immediate and long term implications of Ordinance No. 4325
pertaining to the creation of a Class "P11 liquor license for the
Convenient Food Mart at 2025 East Euclid Avenue, I hereby veto and
return Ordinance No. 4325 without signature.
I do not believe there is a need for a package goods or carry -out
liquor store in every neighborhood of this Village nor have
sufficient numbers of citizens expressed a need for such service
to cause me to change my mind. The increased potential for abuse
of existing liquor laws by under age young people and increased
availability of liquor to young people of driving age causes me
sufficient concern to merit the action I have taken.
This action is not taken unadvisedly. I recognize serious thought
has been given this matter by each Trustee, that a majority believe
the granting of this license to be in the best interest of the
Village and that such action would not harm its citizens. I
respect that opinion sincerely, however, I disagree with
conclusions drawn.
GERALD L. FARLEY
MAYOR
GLF/caf
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: MAYOR'S VETO OF ORDINANCE NO. 4325
DATE: JULY 9, 1991
Attached is a memorandum from Mayor Farley indicating the fact that
his has vetoed Ordinance No. 4325, which would create a Class 11P11
liquor license for the Convenient Food Mart on Euclid Avenue.
This action will be listed on the Village Board agenda for the next
regular meeting on July 16th.
If one or more Trustees would like to pursue this matter in order
to pass this Ordinance, I offer the following, which is taken from
the Illinois Municipal League Handbook, a copy of which is
attached.
The appropriate procedure would be to bring this item up at the
next regular meeting of the Village Board following notification -
which would mean this subject could be brought up on August 6th for
action.
At the August 6th meeting, a motion, with a second, would be
necessary "To pass Ordinance No. 4325 amending Chapter 13 of the
Village Code to create a Class 11P11 liquor license for the
Convenient Food Mart at 2025 East Euclid Avenue and override the
Mayor's veto of this Ordinance."
While the Handbook refers to "reconsider", the action required is
not the same as a motion to reconsider. The appropriate motion,
as noted above, is simply a motion to take specific action.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
must vote even though the addition of his rote nay not hcenough to
achieve the required two-thirds vote.
Approval and Veto .1 (hdi... ees, Res..lotions and Motions
'['he Nionwipal Cntie (Ch. 21, §3-11-18) provides as follows:
.All .•solutions and n otfons (1) wwhieh create any lia-
bility ay l f e weal ..r (2) wrhieh pro, Adc fn, the i pen€h-
titrearalproprdationofitsumn .,sir GO towlliui-covo,
sc-ltiet,l l roper€y, all,! all sir= -lin. € Ila s...I to the s0,
t_anie-iLh Ill bs-def= stz'€I vaitli til€'site e=h-ak-1#thy €nay -o,
s prow f td . h I€,ill sign litc.o Th", f srizie#s to,
disapprove, di _hi dl tis tura to d uta clous,il. v ll€ his
sine [e fto ti -ins, i1 fh neat r€i, d rxi v4izii, ildx- "ty-
:vxunc-iI +e €inning ool b* thao 5 clay`} aft€•, their pa xgc'_
-1 -he clay... soar d-`qup,oce e f aol one or more s€oils
appraprated at ung €rddoanve-, € lotmn_orxootionnak-
ing an appraprhu sr, and, ifsoi the rrnzaiznler 'h-" he
dx
effective. Ilieveve•r the nilyo, U., dis,eplrove enhe,1%
of as urrlivanee, -solation, or nznfioo making an szpluo-
1 r afion It the sexy r f€ 1. to tell ... u i rayed. n Trent
specified le,ololienl orn ... lua€v Willis writ€ nob1cclion,
vc 01tin tits di cignat d tno,� it .ball h€i untie e ff live de-
spite fl - absence of his signattre.
Frr+nz the f evao nt: It g sage it should It, a n•+i that astd, Iron
ladauiocv,. onl, renin tv,olatunt, and million, tion tx e•€I 1 nil nxitted
to the ,na}`or for ilifruval. Merely Iowan. rۥ illatirla in, .1', 1 ao
incpoit€ml na!,1 €-..lz v, not ,.... ,,,t it iliio it x nlinane, avbirls re -
.tones the nia}<zr=s;rplir.'at and is salsjert to vet€'. (Roti v-Wasfxing-
ton,114111,App, 3d9 450'Y F2d 465,71 ldf_Dee 10119i.M It ba,
been held that an undin zn , not apino"J lel the rnayor cannot lie
effectively luxlelt-heelazAil ill, lin,for wet hvlsexlired v th+neat
regular meeting lot It." than It,,, chits niter tis paswgc o1 the
xireasure_ The n€ie li€ ..n,c € f fill= day, after s re. eufatunx is mit
s.fftc°d,nf,andcisensh€=iludi[icathmz=zafii €fb•uE (C.Okaxfllillsh+rn
a. Spanldler. 146 Ili. App. 11509"W 'I he pn=siih=,it €€f .e v-dlage na,
'x€,wise clic wiz,, velip _ala-rr.av€th like€�I1cc�t,a�llxx=zna}�or zsl ,x cit }-_
(Ch. 2.4, §3-12-5).
The statutory veto p i r is strictly cnustrn'€1 and rnci zp a"ia
only matters mhit-1, are exp, saly set frill Ile statute (Roti v. wash -
141
ington, supra). (tinder the managerial form, the mayor or president
rebxins the ahove en intended powers (Ch. 24, §5.3-2). Under the
cunonissxon form, the ui eyor has no right of sato. However, he mist
sign e, m resolution, ordinance, or warrant passed by the council.
(Ch. 24, §4-5-12). It Inas been held that this regairentent is directory
only and that failure of a colour. vim, forty a€apo, to .sign an ordi-
nance that vas passed in substantial compliance with the statutory
wilmirenzrnts v-iR not invalidate the ordinx.,c (Wheeling Trust and
Savings Rank v. fifty of Highland Park, 97 M. App. 3d 519, 42:1
N.E.2d 245,53111, Dee. 53 (1961)).
If the nuasor setocs an ordnoolve or a resolution lir nxotton
'crptihie to s vto, the council, neon the "ecipt of the mayor`s
,,often ohjeetions, -vhall rrronafile, the lame at "the next regular
meeting_" (Oh 24, §3-11-19), It is not clear whether the tittle require-
uient of this 1979 statutory auxendmcnt refers to the meeting at which
the vets nn•ssage hasbeen presented or the next ineeting. Read in full
context, it a o..fd appear that fixe cooed ..list wait o.e additional
meeting to act upon the veto- If, after Inch reconsideration, two -
if all the aldermen then holding office agree to pass such
ordtnanee, resohttion or motion ove, the ataynr s veto, then it slxall he
effective. It h€ old be puiu(ed out [flat the requited vote is based
nitmx 1,o -third, of those old€omen or trustees then holding office.
Thus, are, vacane} fn an aldermanic or council seat is not counted it,
the co tpute[o. of the percentage vote required The vote on the
€pzestionof pnssngeo, i8n•veto is by yeas"and`n.yd` aur I'll the
recorded .n the ponrnal (nsmute b( k). 1. ,Ohiges, the trusters niav
pass uuitfo s,r+solutions andordinances over the presidents veto in
like manneras the aldermen ofacnp anuxvl (Ch 9A,§3 l25). Under
it,,- n€inag"ial fern€, it,, aileron -n and trustees possess file stone
lowers hz override it w eto (Ch. 24, §5-3-3)
By parhanu•ntary rule, the proper action to he taken by the
council at its next regular meeting after a measure adopted by it has
been retxrned to it with it let,, is first to move to reconsider the vote
b}' which the rocz .s..... vas originally adopted. If a nihnity of the
gnornn adopts the untion to reconsider, it is then proper to move
that the €ueasurc be adopted notwith_stmxding fixe veto or that it he
passrel over file eto It two-thirds of the :ddern€en then holding
office % ole tit fa or of that motion, the uxcasure is adopted; if mit, the
veto stands The fail re to reconsider .n ordinance fn this formalistic
nxanner, however, will not render invalid council actions where there
has been con€plianre generally with the stated title and where there
142
I— brio the e €lnir'd t"oflirds vol, =Roger, v. C=i#y of h#eixslista_
200 IW App, 254 (1916); Kelchoinrk r, Lynch, 107 fit. App.24 36, 246
N.E,2dIll (1969)[ Ili ,c's,€ fier;ztionInaeonecil€f_o€odhaane,
"tot,i h, the'na}u.r_=lite, lurk to the=dot, of theorigsell p;a keof
thr ordinance for the lonlots efth to-rvf `ng whether fill, enartturn€
,;is t.nel}- in tern, of ;x stat€ oily "'Inhrzneut that fin=o€Joi.m, he
fiessul s} a partieula, t ire u-ithin the fisx' zl ' at. ( Fairfield v- People
Vit rel, M -C lea, 94 ill. 244 I I4791i-
Reennsideratinn of Actions
1 c€-us,it may ret and r it,w- t,, 1 vu1 .tions opo, question,.
fwf€n it,xod rewind it fit"' ion,40not (Penpleexrel,iiii eRtahort,
Dax4,_284111,439,120N, 320[19151)_`i1€isrsxletssidaj,e•t111sertain
esreption,
I _ `Ph+=.#et. t. p,*twixlr-x th�€t'nrs vol €xt the ciiw s.un€ikh.111"
vee salev"t ztrr .vi.ded ata ls_c#ai uxi voom, nth-tidf -r areliev,
riit at t1 r ap€'#fat € ec'tiugers nr.€n} .44 r . us Iveri•pis= of v hen it., -
vote was taken." [Ch, alit, §,7'11 �20).
2 "'here the "'".61 d h t loall, zti'el oil a proposition and
therea .o rsarf it + rd rite €. tit t -doral t Er of tier
it,
;o-tion after ardl oine o of file ne-Ytn g 1wre odoe =,f other
Leis€ns have intervened - (C'ity of kankaliee a Small, 317 111. 55, 147
N.F, 404 0925)).
3, A city c€a€ru z1 carrot rev tci=its €atoll derivion tet aec,}it €er
reie( t fh. res-oni,.rrxda•_#ion of an ae#vi.€sz-. ti alt .s-hdc-h .., a-zlool.d
to hold a pnblfr hearh,-g ivithouf orrhring ;moll." p oblic hrarinq_
especidly s,It... ill(' dc''ision tis'v"insidi i, noti,czti d ht- miens -e
and ii ft r....+tion not l resenn'd tit file first lo -'hu hear lit,. f�:e—,
City sof Peru, 133 III, App. 2d 74h, 237 N.E.2d 407 t r,1)1'
4 ttlxere parliamexxtar, lo -Ow, It it, whro ,,if h} echo,„
inotillo a vote ata)be• reco€isx 1€ ed (,,. g. cul oh,o( pr .,,char,
ldnift re c .9deration to a numon road, b} a nuvuher 'ho oted o11
the jo vailityusideofthe farir,acildr,;i4on eat Itanxntx-. thecount .1
nuaq oat rrconsider-
z S} here the eodl t € it third taotx ba, otic xze I € I Ill,-
on,
heitis legal 'i", lln' 'toot, t€t.i n€it r€ a€mini'€' the vali€ oN of the°
re xanss€leratt`en. flatemationad %xciely for Krishna C_ .wiooso,ss,
143
ORDINANCE NO. 4325
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PASSED AND APPROVED BY
THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
the 2nd day of July , 1991
Published in pamphlet form by
authority of the corporate
authorities of the Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois, the
3rd day of july _, 1991.
ORDINANCE NO. 4p�
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECT71ON ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
increasing the number of Class 'T" liquor licenses by one (1) (Convenient Food Mart,
2025 East Euclid Road), so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter
13 shall be and read as follows:
Section 13,IL7, Number
Two (2)
Class A Licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Ten (10)
Class C Licenses
One (1)
Class D License
Two (2)
Class E Licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H License
One (1)
Class M License
Two (2)
Class P Licenses
Nineteen (19)
Class R Licenses
Eight (8)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T License
Eight (8)
Class W Licenses
SECTO: ION TWThat this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its , p - assage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES: Busse, Clowes, Floros, Wilks
NAYS: Hoefert, Farley
ABSENT: Corcoran
PASSED and APPROVED this 2nd
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of July , 1991.
Village President
Class
Fgablisbment
Numbe
A
Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
2
B
Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alvee's liquors; Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Gold Eagle liquors; Jay Liquors;
Mt. Prospect liquors; Osco Drugs; Phar-Mor;
Walgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens
(Mt. Prospect Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
1
M
Holiday Inn
1
P
Convenient Food Mart: Shimada Shoten
2
R
Artemis; Boo 111; DJB Brunetti; Dragon City;
Edwardo's; Fellini; Giordano's (Rand Road);
Giordano's (Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan;
Izakaya Sankyu; little America; Magic Dragon
Restaurant; Nina Restaurant; Pepe's; Sakura;
Shin Jung; Sunrise; Torishin; Yasuke
19
S
El Sombrero; Evans; Jake's Pizza;
Jameson's Charhouse; Kampai; Old Orchard Country
Club Restaurant; Sam's Place; Wild Stallions Cafe
8
T
Thunderbird Lanes
1
W
Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut; Rosati's Pizza;
Sizzler Restaurant; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's
—8
58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager W�_�
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: June 28, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-35-V-91, Village of Mount Prospect
LOCATION: 112 East Northwest Highway
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for variances filed by the Village of Mount Prospect. The applicant is
requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a new Police/Fire
Building and required parking at 112 East Northwest Highway:
1. Section 14.1802.A - Ordinance requires 30' front yard;
Proposing 12' minimum front yard.
2. Section 14.1802.13- Ordinance requires 10' interior sideyard and 30' exterior sideyard;
Proposing minimum 8' interior sideyard and l'-4" exterior sideyard.
3. Section 14.1802.E - Ordinance requires 30' parking lot setback from right-of-way
and 10' setback from interior lot line;
Proposing 10' parking lot setback from right-of-way and 3.77' setback on west interior
lot line and 6.18' on north interior lot line.
4. Section 14.1803 - Ordinance allows a maximum lot coverage of 75%;
Proposing 80.7% lot coverage.
5. Section 14.1804.A.2 - Ordinance allows a maximum building height of 30';
Proposing building height of 40.5'.
6. Section 14.3012.A - Ordinance requires 137 on-site parking spaces;
Proposing to provide 99 on-site parking spaces.
7. Section 14.3012.A - Ordinance requires one 12' x 35' loading space;
Proposing to waive this requirement (provide no loading space).
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of June 27, 1991.
At the meeting, David Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning presented an overview of
the application. He explained that the need for the variations is due to the irregular shape
of the lot; the space needs of the new facility; and restrictive ordinance requirements that
do not reflect the existing density and character of development in the downtown area.
John F. Dixon, ZBA-35-V-91
Page Two
June 28, 1991
He stated that the proposed site plan offered several improvements to existing conditions
including: increased parking lot setbacks and screening; increased amount of on-site parking
(70 spaces existing, 99 proposed); decreased lot coverage with a corresponding increase in
open green space and landscaping; the proposed drive-through garage will reduce congestion
on Northwest Highway resulting from fire apparatus maneuvering.
He also indicated that because of the irregular shape of the lot, imposing the required
setbacks would reduce the buildable area of the lot to a degree that a reasonable return on
investment could not be realized. In addition, the new building will replace a building and
use that has existed for 40 years, so the character of the neighborhood will not be altered.
Naris Statkus, Architect for Donohue and Associates, presented a description of the new
building and parking facilities. He explained that the style of the architecture with peaked
roofs, is intended to reflect the character desired for downtown redevelopment.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request raising several questions about the
requested variations and the compatibility of the proposed building with existing and
potential future development in the downtown area. Some concerns were expressed about
the availability of parking in the downtown and the appropriateness of the requested parking
variation.
Accordingly, by a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of
variations #1-5 and 7. And, by a vote of 5-1, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
approval of variance #6.
JF:cl
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 35-V-91 Hearing Date: June 27, 1991
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 112 East Northwest Highway
PUBLICATION DATE: June 11, 1991
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting the following
variations to accommodate construction of a
new Police/Fire Building and required parking:
1. Section 14.1802.A - Ordinance requires 30
ft. front yard; Proposing 12 ft. minimum front
yard; 2. Section 14.1802.13- Ordinance requires
10 ft. interior sideyard and 30 ft. exterior
sideyard; Proposing minimum 8 ft interior
sideyard and 1'-4" exterior sideyard. 3. Section
14.1802.E - Ordinance requires 30 ft. parking
lot setback from right-of-way and 10 ft. setback
from interior lot line; Proposing 10 ft. parking
lot setback from right-of-way and 3.77 ft. setback
on west interior lot line and 6.18 ft. on north
interior lot line. 4. Section 14.1803 - Ordinance
allows a maximum lot coverage of 75%;
Proposing 80.7% lot coverage. 5. Section
14,1804.A.2 - Ordinance allows a maximum
building height of 30 ft. Proposing building
height of 40.5 ft. 6. Section 14.3012.A -
Ordinance requires 137 on-site parking spaces;
Proposing to provide 99 on-site parking spaces.
7. Section 14.3012.A - Ordinance requires one
12'x 35' loading space; Proposing to waive this
requirement (provide no loading space).
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Lois Brothers
OTHERS PRESENT: Assistant Village Manager John Burg
Project Architect, Naras Statkus
ZBA-35-V-91
June 27, 1991
Page 2 of 6
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES Nprne
Chairman Basnik introduced the request as b h `an appli4,tion for variations filed by the
Village of Mount Prospect. Director of'Plar�.nd Zo David Clements, then began
a summary of the application and introdu Mr. Sohn �trg, Assistant Village, who is
handling project coordination for the VillagelWi ager's Offi and Project Architect Naras
Sttkus from Donohue and Associates. 1, ;
Mr. Clements stated that the Village is pr ;pdsing to cootruct a new Police and P ire
building t 112 East Northwest Highway.�e tamed that, the property is moaned a I'.3 2
District, and, that the Police and Fire butt', �s a permuted use. He indicated that a
number of variations are required to redev� gnus prope� due to the irregular shape of
the lot, and that the restrictive se requ' ` nts of the -coning classification do not
reflect the character and type of developmiIt, ha
t is est
in the downtown area. Mr.
rd
Clements noted that, to a great extent,par�gf the hardship in this request was caused by
the obsolete ordinance requirements in tetftni of addressing" downtown redevelopment.
Mr. Clements then summarized each indiv.,4,�l variation;
V
Mr. Clements explained
that at two locations along Northwest High ,ay,` the cornea of the building encroach into
the required front yard. He stated that this ispb imanly attributable to the location of the
apparatus garage and the driveway located of the corner of Maple and Northwest Highway.
To provide space needs ,in the gar ageand t e,;i ecessary pp'jrit of access off Maple Street
required that the building be located near the ;cjrner; and the interior configuration of the
building located the two, corners of the fromf the building into the required front year.
a •w q
ythat this 1 footsideyard
W =14661"Aiii "f,
fQgt interior.; e1b"k r Mr'leinents noted that, presently the parking lot
at the police and fire building is built right,J4,
tthe lot line a zd' the new design provides a 1C1
foot setback with sufficient landscaping whis an improvement over the existing parking
lot design. He stated that the 6 foot ,setback tp the north adjacent to the bank property
and that this setback would allow landscapingwhich would also be an improvement over the
ng lot. He al;pointed out at the 3.77 foot setback to the
zero yard for the existing parki
ZBA-35-V-91
June 27, 1991
Page 3 of 6
west is abutting the Evans Restaurant property but that this setback is only at the nearest
point to this adjoining property, and that the majority of the west setback is increased with
landscaping over existing conditions.
Variation 4. To g1l9_w_ maximm lot goveragg gIN2b. a vanation ot the /n/c requiremenL
Mr. Clements explained that this is a function of the development plan and that as much
open space as possible was provided on the site plan. While he explained that this is a
variation, he also pointed out that the proposed lot coverage is less than the existing
building.
Varialign 5, To. alla a 40.5 foot building hght over 1ht 30foot amimum Mr. Clements
explained that this building height is a result of a desire for a peaked roof to give the
building more character in the Central Business District. He believed that this would be
an excellent design feature of the project and that the building height would not be excessive
concerning surrounding properties.
Variation 6. To reduce the 137 on-site parking snaca requirement to 99 sp-goes. Mr.
Clements explained that parking at the new police and fire building is laid out with one
level of parking below grade in a parking structure and one level of parking at grade. He
stated that this totals 99 spaces and that this amount meets the parking requirements of the
police and fire feasibility study prepared by Donohue. Mr. Clements indicated that this
study reveals that 99 spaces should be sufficient for the facility.
Variation 7. T
_Q waive the reggirgd 1T x 35' loadip_g spam Mr. Clements noted that this
type of loading area is not necessary for a building of this type where there is not a routine
deliveries of supplies and equipment. Most deliveries are done through small delivery trucks
and not large over -the -road vehicles.
As a summary, Mr. Clements explained that, while there are a number of variations for the
proposed facility, there are several improvements over existing conditions. Those being:
Item 1 - Reducing total overall lot coverage.
Item 2 - Providing an increased setback with landscaping on Maple Street adjoining the
single family properties and the one-story office building across the street.
Item 3 - Increasing the setback and landscaping to the property to the northwest
allowing more light and air and open space to this adjoining property.
Mr. Clements noted that these improvements to the site plan help justify the variations
requested. Mr. Clements then provided a brief summary statement to address the standards
for variations. He indicated that this property could not yield a reasonable return if only
developed under the regulations of the B-2 District. He explained that required setbacks
do not reflect the character of desired downtown redevelopment, and that if you built on
this lot to meet all the setback requirements, the parcel would, in effect, be unbuildable for
the new Police and Fire Building.
ZBA-3S-V-91
June 27, 1991
Page 4 of 6
Next Mr. Clements explained that the phghtl " ° i;he owners s due to unique circumstances
and that there is limited availability, of ons for a new Police and Fire
Building. He stated that the building is dest e to meet r , public safety requirements of
the Village and that the proposed size of thilquIding neces *�,tates certain variations, to to
some extent, these variations provide a pulA� s0tvice that unique to this request;
The variations will not be detrimental to the p tbec welfare injunious to other properties
in the neighborhood. He stated that the pr site planpt ovides improved parking lot
setbacks and landscaping over existing cone
Mr. Clements then noted that the variation,? ` n reds the supply of light or air to
'tlaway from adjoining properties and that the to huildin is,§ cated
structures. Increased landscaping is destgpe taw abut to buildings to the northwest
providing more open space. Also, tihe A hrough dove garage configuration will
�.
eliminate fire apparatus having to maneuver ram l lord rest Highway into the garage
reducing congestion on the public street, wi b is;an impro pment over existing conditions.
The variations will not alter the character o0�nnaghbor d as the new Police and Fire
Building replaces a municipal building wh ph `has can to = for 40 years, Mr. Clements
concluded by stating that these specific sethic" iations = appropriate for a downtown
development.
10
Project Architect Maras Statkus then proved Jbe Zoning Board of Appeals with a brief
suounary of the parking lot design and, the j404 r layout ;Zthe building, He also oriented
the Zoning Beard of Appeals to a mounted,mlration dept�ing window treatment; Color of
brick, and roofline of the building,
The Zoning Board of Appeals then genera,,,,""',' discussed th tequest. Mr» cannon asked if
the Village had made any attempt to acquit;acent prom ties to reduce variations, Mr.
Clements indicated that there had been'�r�tde, ' pf acquiring properties to the
northwest but only for surface parking, to el .'`' to the n pd to construe the below -grade
parking. Mr. Clements stated that this woulde about $1 million from project costs, but
that this alternative would not have elimrnat 4,ibe tweed far setback variations. With this
information, Mr. Lannon concluded that tt 4 �dsdng street pattern and the bank to the
north help limit the redevelopment space wf"'t tt this bloc' and contribute to the hardship
of the petitioner. is
Mr. Basnik noted the staff proposal to drafp, `,,new downs n development ordinance to
help address some of these things, and Mr usnilc asked lI a new Zoning; Ordinance for
downtown would eliminate many of these vara titins. Mr. Cd ements stated, while downtown
Zoning Ordinance had not been drafted, llt would be possible that all of the setback
variations could be reduced or minimized with a new zoning district.
Mr. Lannon then indicated he had a concer bout parktn� for the facility. He questioned
the large variation of required parking �MI ";indicated fat, with the parking problem
ZBA-35-V-91
June 27, 1991
Page 5 of 6
downtown, reducing parking with this building could contribute parking problems in
surrounding areas. Mr. Clements acknowledged that there may be isolated parking
problems in the Central Business District, but that this proposal provides more parking for
the facility than existing.
Mr. Basnik and Ms. Skowron noted that they didn't necessarily agree that there are severe
parking problems in the Central Business District.
Mr. Lannon asked about the number of employees in the building. Assistant Village
Manager John Burg stated that there would be 55 employees at the building at any one
time. Mr. Lannon then asked about what would be the growth capacity for the building, and
Mr. Statkus indicated that they believe that the building was designed to accommodate
about a 10% increase in the number of employees. Mr. Lannon questioned the pattern of
shift changes in the building, and stated that he had a concern that at this peak time of shift
changes, there would not be sufficient parking in the below -grade parking deck and the
surface parking. He believed shift changes could contribute to parking problems at the site.
Mr. Cassidy asked if there would be a pistol range in the building and staff responded there
would be no pistol range.
Ms. Skowron noted that the building design is suited for this irregular lot and suggested that
if there was a growth in employment at this facility in the future, we might have to look to
require some employees to park in remote locations and walk to the building.
The Zoning Board of Appeals noted that the variations seem justified in this application
considering the irregular shape of the parcel and the extreme setback requirements required
by the B-2 District. Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. The
Chairman then considered a motion on variations 1 through 5 being setback variations for
the building, setback variations for parking, the building height, lot coverage and waiver of
the loading dock.
Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of those
variations to the Village Board. The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Pratt, Basnik
NAYS: None -
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then asked for a motion on the variation authorizing a parking reduction
for the new Police and Fire Building.
Ms. Skowron moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a parking
reduction for the Police and Fire Building. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy.
ZBA- 5-V- 1
June 27, 1991
Fags 6 of
,61 It
Upon roll call. ( AYE& Cassidy, Br t tt erg Pratt,,""'kovrron, Basn k
NAYS: Lannon
Motion carried by a vote, of 5-1,
Mr. Lannon voted against the parking ar�attt� heli vin that there wvould not be sufficient
parking primarilysin the facture for all employ s, shift perso tel and visitors t the building,
These recoarune dations will be forwarded to' " illy e P lard for their consideration.
Respectively sttbmttlwedi 1,1
David , M. Clements
Director of Planntq and Zoning
J;
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
.......................
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID A CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
JUNE 17, 1991
CASE NO.:
ZBA-35-V-91
APPLICANT:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ADDRESS:
112 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-2 Business Office
LOT SIZE: 55,872 sq. ft. (1.28 acres)
% COVERAGE: 80.7%
FAR.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a new
Police/Fire Building and required parking:
1. Section 14.1802.A - Ordinance requires 30 ft. front yard;
Proposing 12- ft. minimum front yard
2. Section 14.1802.E - Ordinance requires 10 ft. interior sideyard and 30 ft. exterior
sideyard;
Proposing minimum 8 ft interior sideyard and 1'4' exterior sideyard.
3. Section 14.1802.E - Ordinance requires 30 ft. parking lot setback from right-of-way
and 10 ft. setback from interior lot line;
Proposing 10 ft. parking lot setback from right-of-way and 3.77 ft. setback on west
interior lot line and 6.18 ft. on north interior lot line.
4. Section 14.1803 - Ordinance allows a maximum lot coverage of 75%;
Proposing 80.7% lot coverage,
5. Section 14.1804.A.2 - Ordinance allows a maximum building height of 30 ft.
Proposing building height of 40.5 ft.
6. Section 14.3012.A - Ordinance requires 137 on-site parking spaces;
Proposing to pro -vide 99 on-site parking spaces.
7. Section 14.3012.A - Ordinance requires one 12' x 35' loading space;
Proposing to waive this requirement (provide no loading space).
Summary of application: The Village of Mount Prospect is proposing to construct a new
34,052 sq. ft. Police/Fire Building and parking at 112 East Northwest Highway. The
property is zoned a B-2 District. A Police/Fire Station is a permitted use. Several
variations are required :o redevelop this lot due in part to the irregular shape of the lot,
space requirements of the larger facility, and restrictive ordinance requirements that do
not reflect the existing density and character of development in the downtown area.
My -TOW,
The proposed new Police/Fire building will replace the existing 40 year old facility and
adjacent annex and garage, Many of the variations required are due to the Zoning
Ordinance not having a separate zoning classification to accommodate the unique
requirements of development in the downtown area.
Following is a brief comparison of the existing and proposed facilities to demonstrate the
potential impact of the new facility on the surrounding neighborhood:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
Existin
Proposed
Building Size (gross building area)
27,300 s.f.
45,009 s.f.
Building height
33 ft.
40' - 4"
Lot coverage
83.3% (Approx)
80.7%
Front Building setback
30 ft.
12 ft. min.
Exterior side building setback
30.63 ft.
1 ft. 4 in. min.
(10' typical)
Interior side building setback
2.42 ft. (Annex
8 ft.
bldg.)
Exterior side parking setback
3 ft.
10 ft.
Interior side parking setback (north)
2 ft.
6.18 ft.
Interior side parking setback (west)
0 ft.
3.77 ft. min. (32'
typical)
On-site parking
70 surface
99 total (65 sur-
face 34 basement)
This brief analysis illustrates that the existing facility does not conform to several of the
current zoning standards. It also indicates that the proposed facility will reduce lot
coverage; increase all parking lot setbacks, and the interior side building setback. In
addition, the proposed facility will increase on-site parking by 29 spaces.
The building setbacks will be reduced on Maple Street and in the southeastern corner of
the lot. This is due to the proposed configuration of the building to allow direct drive-
through access for fire apparatus from Maple Street to Northwest Highway. Presently, in
order to maneuver large fire apparatus into the garage, it is sometimes necessary to block
traffic on Northwest Highway. To remedy this .problem, the proposed facility provides a
drive-through garage with ingress from Maple Street and egress onto Northwest Highway.
The size requirements of the garage, and the need to have the garage be located near the
corner, contribute to the reduced setback on Maple Street.
Aesthetic_ Considerations
Continuous landscaping with both trees and shrubs will be installed around the southeast
corner of the building and along Maple Street where the setbacks are significantly reduced.
Ample landscaping is proposed on the south and west sides of the building. In addition,
landscaping on all edges of the parking lot will exceed current conditions.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4
In addition to landscaping, the architectural style of the building was given special
consideration to ensure that it reflected the character desired in the downtown area. The
roof line of the building is varied and accentuated with peaked gables. This contributes to
the need for a height variation. The roof will be clad with gray -green shingles to give a
slate -like appearance. The hose tower protrudes from the southeast comer of the building
providing a focal point and a training facility. The exterior walls will be red brick with
contrasting stone banding to visually break up the elevations.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact:
Surrounding properties consist of a mix of commercial and residential developments. The
increased parking lot setbacks and proposed landscaping should reduce the existing impact
on abutting properties and those across Maple Street.
The most affected property consists of a small commercial building on the corner of Maple
and Evergreen Streets. It is directly across the street from the proposed fire apparatus
garage. The garage doors are set back 10 ft. from the lot line. However, a stairwell on this
east facade protrudes into the 10 ft. setback, coming as close as 1'-4" to the lot line. The
second floor at this location includes windows with roof gables, which add character to the
east elevation.
The front setback from Northwest Highway will also be reduced. Staff notes that the
position of the building on this irregular-shaped lot results in the comer portions of the
building encroaching into the setback. Also, while the distribution of open green space
along Northwest Highway is shifted away from the southeast comer of the lot, overall there
is more landscaped green space in front of the proposed building than currently exists.
With regard to the parking and loading space variations requested, staff notes that the
proposed 99 on-site spaces meei the parking demand 'defined by the feasibility study
conducted by Donohue and Associates, Inc. The parking rate required for this use is four
spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of gross building area. This is the same rate generally applied to
office and commercial retail uses since Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance doesn't include
a specific rate for this type of municipal use. In addition, this rate does not account for on -
street parking which is available in the downtown area. The Police and Fire Departments
believe that 99 spaces are sufficient for public and employee parking.
The Zoning Code also requires one 12' x 35' loading space. A waiver to this requirement
has been requested because there is no need for a loading space. Any deliveries that might
be made would be via UPS or similar service.
OJUER VILLAGE STAFF OMMENTS
Inspection Services and Engineering made several comments regarding design and
construction issues that should be addressed during the permit review process. These
include:
1. Sidewalks should continue through driveways.
2. Location of refuse area may be difficult to access by truck.
3. Grading plan, showing detention and downspouts must be submitted,
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 5
4. MWRD permit required for sanitary sewer.
5. State permit required for driveway access onto Northwest Highway.
Staff has no objections to the variations, and recommends approval of the application.
Many of the variations are the result of the Zoning Ordinance not having standards to
accommodate the unique character of downtown development. In addition, this is an
irregularly-shaped corner lot.
As a summary statement to address the variation standards:
1. The property cannot yield a reasonable return if only developed under the regulations
of the B-2 District. Required setbacks do not reflect the character of desired
downtown development, and would render this lot unbuildable for a new Police/Fire
Building.
2. The plight of the owner is due to unique circumstances in that there is limited
availability of land in desireable locations for a new Police/Fire building. Also, the
size of the building is designed to meet the public safety requirements of the Village.
This proposed size requires certain variations, so the variations provide a public
purpose that is unique to this request.
3. The variations will not be detrimental to the public welfare or injurious to other
property or improvements in the neighborhood. The proposed site plan provides
improved parking lot setbacks and landscaping.
4. The variations will not reduce the supply of light or air to adjoining properties, not
increase congestion on public streets. The proposed building is located away from
adjoining structures. Increased landscaping is designed to abut the buildings to the
northwest, providing more open space than existing conditions. Also, the drive-
through garage configuration will eliminate fire apparatus having to maneuver from
Northwest Highway into the garage, reducing congestion on the street.
The variations will not alter the character of the neighborhood, as the new facility
replaces a municipal building that has existed for 40 years. Specific setback
variations are appropriate for a downtown neighborhood.
DMC:hg
CAF/
7/8/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 112 EAST NORTHWAY HIGHWAY
WHEREAS, Village of Mount Prospect, through its administration,
(hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for
variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 112 East Northwest Highway
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot "All in Corporate Subdivision No. 1, being a subdivison
of Lots 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14 in Block 12 in Busse
and Willie's Resubdivision in Mount Prospect, in the West
half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of
the Third Principal Meridian, according to Plat thereof
registred in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook
County, Illinois on January 26, 1979, as Document Number
3072886;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from the following Sections
in order to construct a Fire and Police Station on the subject
property:
1. Section 14.1802.A to allow a 12 foot front yard, instead of
the required 30 feet;
2. Section 14.1802.B to allow an 8 foot sideyard, instead of the
required 101, and a 11 411 exterior sideyard, rather than the
required 301;
3. Section 14.1802.E to allow a 10 foot parking lot setback from
the right-of-way, instead of the required 301, and a 3.77 foot
setback on the west lot line, and 6.181 on the north lot line,
instead of the required 101;
4. Section 14.1803 to allow 80.7% lot coverage, rather than the
75% allowed;
5. - Section 14.1804.A.2 to allow a building height of 40.5 feet,
rather than the 301 allowed;
6. Section 14.3012.A to allow 99 on-site parking spaces, rather
than the required 137;
7. Section 14.3012.A to waive the requirement for a 121 x 351
loading space; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 35-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
June, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the lith day of June, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 35-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
0 MA
ZBA 35-V-91
Page 2 of 2
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
gg�g'ION Ti+7o: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the
following variations in order to construct a Fire and Police
Station:
1. Section 14.1802.A to allow a 12 foot front yard, instead of
the required 30 feet;
2. Section 14.1802.E to allow an 8 foot sideyard, instead of the
required 101, and a 11 411 exterior sideyard, rather than the
required 30';
3. Section 14.1802.E to allow a 10 foot parking lot setback from
the right-of-way, instead of the required 301, and a 3.77 foot
setback on the west lot line, and 6.181 on the north lot line,
instead of the required 101;
4. Section 14.1803 to allow 80.7% lot coverage, rather than the
75% allowed;
5. Section 14.1804.A.2 to allow a building height of 40.5 feet,
rather than the 301 allowed;
6. Section 14.3012.A to allow 99 on-site parking spaces, rather
than the required 137;
7. Section 14.3012.A to waive the requirement for a 12' X 351
loading space; and
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 11991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager 11%L
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: June 28, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-36-V-91, Village of Mount Prospect
LOCATION; It South Pine Street
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for variations filed by the Village of Mount Prospect. The applicant is
requesting a variation to Section 14.2002.13 to allow a 5' sideyard setback to accommodate
installation of three temporary trailers at 11 South Pine Street (former Public Works
Building). The Zoning Code requires a 10' sideyard on this property.
The Zoning Board of Appears considered the request at their meeting on June 27, 1991.
At the meeting, David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, presented an overview
of the application. Mr. Clements stated that the three trailers would provide office and
locker space for Police and Fire Department employees during construction of the new
Police/Fire facility at 112 East Northwest Highway. The trailers would be removed when
the new facility was ready for occupancy, which should be in about two years.
He further explained that the need to maintain a fire lane next to the building and the
location of catch basins dictated the location of the trailers.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request and expressed some concerns about
the potential for a future owner to continue the variation.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variation to Section 14.2002.B to allow a 5' sideyard setback to accommodate three
temporary trailers at 11 South Pine Street conditioned on:
(1) Expiration of the variation upon vacation or ceasing of use of the trailers by
the Village of Mount Prospect.
JF:cl
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 36-V-91 Hearing Date: June 27, 1991
PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 11 South Pine Street
PUBLICATION DATE: June 11, 1991
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.2002.13 to allow a 5 ft. sideyard
setback rather than 10 ft. as required by Code
to accommodate three temporary trailers.
rAM.-M031 100MVVN:619190
M. 110ft
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
Lois Brothers
Assistant Village Manager John Burg
Project Architect, Naras Statkus
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik then introduced the next agenda item being a request by the Village of
Mount Prospect for variations to the 10 foot sideyard requirement to allow a 5 foot setback
for three temporary trailers at 11 South Pine Street.
Mr. Clements then summarized the request for the Zoning Board and stated that the first
phase of the Police and Fire project would be to move certain operations into the old
Public Works Garage on Pine Street. He stated that remodelling will be taking place in that
building, but that also three trailers need to be installed south of the existing building for
office and for locker facilities. He stated that the location of the trailers was dictated
somewhat by the existence of a storm sewer and two catch basins and the requirements for
a firelane between the trailers and the building. Mr. Clements stated that the trailers could
not be located on the catch basins for maintenance reasons and that the firelane was
necessary for emergency vehicles. He stated considering these two constraints, the trailers
had to be placed 5 feet from the south lot line. Mr. Clements explained that the property
to the south is a parking lot for the Aldi' s building and that reducing the 10 foot yard to 5
feet would not have any impact on this adjoining parking lot. Mr. Clements concluded that
the temporary trailers would only be at the facility for two years and that the variation
would only need to be in place for that length of time.
ZBA-36-V-91
June 27, 1991
Page 2 of 2
The Zoning Beard of ,appeals generally discussed the request and Mr. Lannon suggested
putting an expiration on the variation. He had a concern that, if the variation raze with the
land, some future owner might be, able to tale advantage of that variation with some other
building configuration or constru tion that rnay'not necessarily be in the best interest of the
Village. Mr. Brettragr suggested that perhaps there would be a limitation that the
variation only be conditioned upon municipal purposes.
The Zoning Board of appeals generally di tus d the request and it was concluded that
there should be some condition tsn the length= of time the trailers in the variation should
exist at this location.
Mr. Brettrag r moved that the, Zoning Bard of Appeals recornmend approval of a
reduction of a 111 foot setback to" feet for thrno temporary trailers subject to a condition
that the variations expire with removal of the trailers and use by the corporate authorities
of the Village of Mount Prospect, The rnotiron vas seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS
Motion approved by a vote of &0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Tillage Board for their consideration.
Respectively submitted,
i,�
David M. Clements,
Director of Planning and Zoning
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNK CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
JUNE 17, 1991
CASE NO.:
ZBA-36-V-91
APPLICANT:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ADDRESS:
11 SOUTH PINE STREET
LOCATION MAP:
I
I
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B-3
LOT SIZE: 35,841 sq. ft. (157.21 x 228')
% COVERAGE: N/A - Not increasing
F-A—R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
REQUES
The applicant is requesting a variation to Section ' 14.2002.13 to allow a 5 ft. sideyard setback
rather than 10 ft. as required by Code to accommodate three temporary trailers.
Summary of application: The Village is proposing to install three (3) trailers in the parking
lot of the former Public Works Building. The trailers will provide office and locker space
for Police and Fire Department employees during construction of the new Police/Fire
facility at 112 East Northwest Highway. The proposed location of the trailers requires a
Variation to allow a sideyard of 5 feet where Code requires a 10 ft. sideyard.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The trailers will be located in an
existing paved parking area to the south of the former Public Works building. The trailers
will not increase existing lot coverage. Abutting properties are also used as parking lots, so
the impact on surrounding properties will be minimal.
Two factors were critical in determining the location of the trailers. First, an existing
sanitary line is located near the middle of the paved area. The trailers could not be located
over the catch basins. Second, a fire lane must be maintained next to the building. An 18
ft. drive aisle is proposed which will accommodate fire access and stairs for ingress/egress
to the trailers.
These tactors and the 12 ft. width of two of the trailers reduce the available sideyard width
to 5 ft. Staff notes that surrounding parking lots are paved to the lot line. However, a
grade change, maintained by a retaining wall, prevents encroachment onto abutting
properties.
QTHELt VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
The Fire Department requires that the fire lane be posted and no parking signs be attached
to the building wall. Engineering also requires that the trailers not block the catch basins.
UMMARY/REC-QMMENDATIO
Staff has no objections to this request. The trailers could not be located on this site without
some variations. Staff also notes that the trailers will be removed when the new Police/Fire
building is occupied.
DMC:hg
CAF/
7/8/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 11 SOUTH PF, STREET
WHEREAS, Village of Mount Prospect, through its administration,
(hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application
for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 11 South Pine
Street (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally
described as:
Lot "All in Corporate Subdivision No. 8, being a
subdivision of Lots 13, 14, 15, 16 and 17 (except the
north 22 feet thereof) in Block 2 in Busse and Wille's
Resubdivision in Mount Prospect in the West 1/2 of Section
12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.2002.E to
allow a five foot (51) sideyard instead of the required 10 feet in
order to permit the installation of temporary trailers for use by
the Fire and Police Departments; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 36-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
June, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the lith day of June, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 36-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein.as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant a variation from Section 14.2002.B
to allow a five foot (51) sideyard instead of the required 10 feet
in order to permit the installation of temporary trailers for use
by the Fire and Police Departments.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variation granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
ZBA 36-V-91
Page 2 of 2
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
ordinance.
SECTIONFIVE:This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.,
AYES:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
�E—ar`oi A. —Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
�R. FROM: DAVIDAI. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 11, 1991
SUBJECT: 1824 SITKA LANE
DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION - DRIVEWAY APRON WIDTH
The applicant is seeking the above noted Development Code modification in order to
receive approval for a 23'-4" wide driveway apron with an additional 2-1/2 ft. flare on the
east side of the apron. The extra width to the original driveway apron was recently poured
without a permit. The owner has requested and received approval from the Zoning Board
of Appeals for an extra -wide driveway and is now seeking approval from the Plan
Commission for the driveway apron. The property is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential
and is surrounded by similar residential uses. The driveway itself is used for vehicle parking,
access to a garage and as a basketball court. A basketball standard is located on the west
edge of the expanded driveway and is not located near the driveway apron or street.
The Plan Commission met during a special meeting on Wednesday, July 10, 1991 and voted
9-0 in favor of recommending that the applicant's Development Code modification be
approved for a 23'-4" driveway apron. During the meeting, the applicant presented a
petition signed by his neighbors which indicated they had no problems with the expanded
driveway and there were no objectors present during the Plan Commission meeting to
oppose this request.
DMC:hg
CAF
7/11/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE A MODIFICATION TO REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 16
ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNTPPOSPECT --- FOR PROE!ERTY LOCATED AT 1824 STTKA LANE
WHEREAS, Daniel Usalis (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
requested a modification from the Development Code (Chapter 16) of
the Village of Mount for property commonly known as 1824 Sitka Lane
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) and legally described
as follows:
Lot 199 in Brickman Manor Second Addition Unit No. 3,
being a subdivision of part of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 25, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting a modification from the
Development Code to permit a twenty three foot four inch (231 411)
driveway apron at the parkway; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modification from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on
Wednesday, July 3, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendation
relative to the modification requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, and the
President and Board of Trustees have determined that the best
interests of the Village would be served in granting the
modification requested herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO:That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant the modification from the
Development Code as requested and permit a 231 41, driveway apron
at the parkway.
SECTION THREE: Except for the modification from the Development
Code granted herein, all other requirements of said Development
Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Modification
1824 Sitka
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: AMENDMENT TO TRAFFIC CODE
DATE: JUNE 25, 1991
Due to the fact that the Fire Department equipment will need a wide
radius in order to maneuver the turn into the old Public Works
building, it is necessary to delete the 2 hour parking presently
permitted on both the west and east side of Pine Street between
Central Road and Northwest Highway.
Section Three of the Ordinance establishes no parking any time on
that same one block area. While employees will be allowed to park
on the east side of the street, the Traffic Code will reflect no
parking and tickets will be issued to anyone not displaying an
employee parking sticker.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
caf/
CAF/ .
7/18/91
8/2/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIX OF CHAPTER 18
ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.1905.B and Sections 18.1905.C.1 and
18.1905.0.2 of Article XIX entitled "Construction, Penalties and
Disposition of Fines" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended it
their entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 18.1905.B and
Section 18.1905.0 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be
and read as follows:
B. Notwithstanding the penalties provided in subsection A
of this Section for a person convicted of a violation of
any provision of this Chapter, any police officer may,
in lieu of the filing of the complaint in court in the
first instance, issue to such alleged violator a citation
with respect to the violation of the following:
1. Any Section in Article XIII entitled "Stopping,
Standing and Parking" of this Chapter, except for
subsections I and J of Section 18.1322.
2. Any Section in Article XIV entitled "Miscellaneous
Laws" of this chapter.
3. Any Section in Article XV entitled "Equipment of
Vehicles" of this Chapter.
4. Any Section of Article XVII entitled "Weight and
Load" of this Chapter.
5. Any violation of the Illinois Vehicle Code or
Chapter 18 (Mount Prospect Traffic Code) which does
not require a court appearance.
C. Such citation shall be on a standard form for use in the
Circuit Court of Cook County and commonly known as a "PC"
ticket or shall be in the form of a notice suitable for
mailing, and shall stated the specific Section of this
Chapter that was violated and shall inform the alleged
violator that he may settle the said violation claim and
avoid an appearance in court for such a violation in the
following manner:
1. The alleged violator may settle such violation claim
by payment at the Police Department of the Village
or at the Village Hall of the sum of Twenty Dollars
($20.00) within ten (10) days following the issuance
of said citation, or by depositing the pre -addressed
citation, with payment enclosed, in the U. S. Mail.
2. In the event that the said violator to whom the
citation is issued fails to settle the violation
Chapter 18
compliance
Page 2 of 2
claim within a period of ten (10) days and he is
issued a final notice and given an additional period
of ten (10) days to settle the violation claim, then
upon payment of the sum of Forty Dollars ($40.00)
shall be made to the Police Department of the
Village or at the Village Hall, or by depositing the
pre -addressed citation, with payment enclosed, in
the U. S. Mail during said period. 11
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form the manner provide by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this -- day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1991.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS-if"ECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: June 28, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-30-V-91, Donald and Gail Forlani
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for variation filed by Donald and Gail Forlani. The applicant is requesting
a variation to Section 14.1102.13 to allow a sideyard setback of 28" (2.33') to accommodate
an existing patio used as a basketball court.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of June 27, 1991.
At the meeting, Donald and Gail Forlani presented testimony in support of their request.
They explained that they installed the 20' x 20' concrete pad themselves and didn't realize
a permit was required. They chose the location because it was on of the most level areas
of their yard. In addition, it was close to the house and screened from the neighbor by a
5' solid wood fence.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the concrete pad is only 2.33' from the side lot line
and that 6.5' is required on this lot. To comply with Code, 4.17' of pavement would have
to be removed.
The Zoning Board of appeals generally discussed the request noting the irregular
topography of the lot and that the basketball court is screened from the affected neighbor.
They also noted that locating a basketball boop in the front yard next to the driveway could
be dangerous as their road is quite busy.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variance to Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 20' x 20' patio/basketball court to remain as
installed 2.33' from the side lot line.
JF:cl
0
}' k- ° lst T to xANlN'S •Xti5U6DIYt&ION, Wing a Xeau:Nr vtxlwr Ot tiu tau 3(t u
% p � � Wt 1 (Oxcaµl tlt0 SOUth 905.11 tact liwr..•Of� 1 X Ou .e - t my
s
t..tl Nutxilvof t Seulh Cnat 1f1 { Dt is at ;tar € t
. r1,,4 tlrueuut} Of 50eelem IO. TnvnehlD
Ctincl Dsl Xt•cltlLan. !n COOk COantY. ltl
' 'KhNS ARE REY!E..};ti Uiloa JHt PLAY
SUMMED. AS 9WNERIAGENT Of THE
PROPERTY, I HEREBY THE
` k TMT SEIIMITTED A#! A TRTUEO COPY OF
.T X f ; EXISTINGTURES ANO
y4 I
f . h
ti (J FZ VLMENTS,
vrt
r ' d, .✓ ! – DATE -
144 c
ATf—
YAC IV -
ufi� � f�i' � FS � I fAffML•T.�®hr /^.� v�,.,r..> ! ow....v ss..
-
e 3'1 q
S r
. p
e _
xf
� ` ]�! �, ���f �•lafi��Jf���+t .rrrv`� r o.tlN•tGF .EASE�s=.�.4�52` _ � a .,:..� V
y, � r i' rr<rr ,? � r.e rf.rwr •;:C:1 `" -. t4++,>
j II�cora 1vrls
t
1
s;
qlNN�
n �� r -a uav's
r ,� v;;.r -,_� ,� c
r
's,
p,
�§kty�V - � a:•r.f wr. rr-f-S- ,r...,r (rx are
r a
w. ,r,, �'�'"�"'W�#!1►'Irli11A pin �' -,,
.wAUr
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 30-V-91
Hearing Date: June 27, 1991
PETITIONER:
Donald and Gail Forlani
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
407 S. Meier Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
June 11, 1991
REQUEST:
Section 14.1102.B to allowa
sideyard setback of 28" (2 . 33
to accommodate an existing patio
used as a basketball court.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102.B to
allow a sideyard setback of 28" (2.331) to accommodate an
existing patio used as a basketball court.
The petitioners, Donald and Gail Forlani of 407 S. Meier Rd.,
presented their case stating that they installed a 20' x 20'
patio in their rear yard that's about 2.51 from the side lot
line. Mr. Forlani stated that they use the patio as a
basketball court and there is a 5' wood fence along the side
lot line. Mr. Forlani stated that he did not have a permit
when he put the patio in because he thought if the homeowner
did the work a permit was not needed.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the patio is only 28" from the lot line and for
this particular lot the sideyard requirement is 6.5'. Miss,
Farnham stated that the patio was located on a level area 6f
close to the house. The patio is screened from the most
affected neighbor by the fence. To comply with Code the
petitioner would have to remove 4.5' of the patio. Miss
Farnham stated that staff had no objections.
Chairman Basnik asked the petitioner to present a hardship
for the variation.
Mr. Forlani stated that he di
to his driveway because the d
quite busy. It would also be
The Board then discussed the
Basnik stated that no neighbc
Lannon stated that it is in'""t
fence. Mr. Brettrager stated
Chairman Basnik then entertal
petitioners request as, propoc
to Section 1,4.1102.B 'to all'ov.
(2.33') to accommodate an exi
court.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr.r Pratt
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:,Lannon,
NAYS:' None
Motion carried by a vote of
This case must still 'be hea
ZBA-30-91
June 27, 1991
Page 2 of 2
want a basketball net next
ay slopes and Meier Road is
sive to remove.
ioners request. Chairman
ve any objections. Mr.
ar yard and screened by the
it is on level ground.
motion to grant the
exhibit 1 for a variation
deyard setback of 28"
patio used as a basketball
t, Cassidy, Brettrager,
nik
re the Village Board.
Ile Thompson
ing Secretary
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
ViLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECf
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN �YC'
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JUNE 17, 1991
ZBA-30-V-91
DONALD AND GAIL FORLANI
407 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
N
■
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE:
18,883.8 sq. ft. (65' x 290.5')
% COVERAGE:
21.7%
F-A—R.:
N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicants are requesting a variation to Section 14.11023 to allow a sideyard setback
of 28" (233) to accommodate an existing basketball court.
I IR 6
lafflw - � RKWUMMIR M.,
Summary of application: The applicant installed a 20' x 2W concrete pad for a basketball
coup 2.33 ft. (28") from their side lot line. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 6.5 ft. sideyard
setback. The pad was installed without a permit and the applicant is seeking a variation to
allow the pad to remain in the existing location.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is very deep with
irregular, slightly rolling topography. The court was located in an area that was relatively
flat, therefore, requiring a minimum amount of regrading. They also wanted the court to
be located close to the house but not in the middle of their yard.
The basketball court is screened from the affected neighbor by a solid wood fence. The
basketball goal is located so that any poorly thrown shots would remain in the Forlani's
yard.
Staff notes that this is a very large lot and lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
In addition, there are no visible signs (i.e.) erosion or mud patches that the pavement has
created any drainage problems in the sideyard.
To bring the pad into compliance would require removing 4.17 ft. of pavement. The
applicant should address the feasibility of this action.
OTHER VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
No major objections or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
SUMNIARYJRN
Staff has no major objections to this request noting that the court is screened from the
affected neighbor. In addition, lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
While no particular hardship exists, the current location of the basketball court does not
appear to be injurious to the affected neighbor.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: July 31, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-37-V-91, 205 South Audrey Lane
As you will see in the attached recommendation letter, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted
to deny a front yard variation at 205 South Audrey Lane. A side yard variation was
approved.
This memo is being written to advise the Village Board that the petitioner has revised the
site plan to substantially reduce the front yard variation. This revision would meet the goals
expressed by the Zoning Board and staff at the public hearing.
The revised site plan is attached, and depicts the garage addition maintaining the same front
setback as the house. However, because the frontage of the lot curves along Audrey Lane,
maintaining the same setback results in a 3' encroachment into the 30' required yard.
Staff would recommend approval of the revised plan, as this minimizes the variation, and
still meets the needs of the petitioner in providing an additional garage space.
DMC:cl
0
�1
M
1
hlEbJ 3'p WIC �—
2�'o Fp 1
mFF6 E b
L - = 2 .�
N Etc i L�7
41 t -3 -`T'4 i -41-16-E 11f
( •I �%lt�J� iiia l I 4i v. "j4cl�i. `All-,VlVchi l
I✓ T
N
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
-
FROM: David M. ClementWsz, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-37-V-91, Frank DiVita
LOCATION: 205 South Audrey Lane
DATE: July 22, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Frank DiVita. The applicant is requesting the following
variations to accommodate an addition to an existing one -car garage at 205 South Audrey
Lane:
1) Section 14,1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30' as required by
code.
2) Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" side yard setback rather than 9.25' as required by
code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, Mr. DiVita explained that he wanted to create a two -car garage by adding to
his one -car garage. He stated that the angle of his lot line limits how much width could be
added to the side to avoid significantly impacting his neighbor. Adding to the front provides
additional length to the garage.
Julie Farnham Planner, explained that the applicants's lot is wedge-shaped with a curved
frontage which contributes to the need for the requested variations. She noted that it might
be possible to modify the proposed building plan to minimize the front yard encroachment
by adding extra length toward the back.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Some concerns were expressed that
the house is currently for sale and whether the proposed addition was for the applicant's
future use. The Zoning Board also expressed concerns about the degree of front yard
encroachment proposed. The Zoning Board expressed support for the alternative suggested
by staff to add to the back rather than to the front of the existing garage.
Accordingly, by a 0-7 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of a variation
to Section 14.1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback. They indicated that any addition
should be flush with the front of the existing house. Also, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board
of Appeals recommends approval of a variation to Section 14.1102 to allow a 6%9" side yard
setback to accommodate an addition to the existing garage at 205 South Audrey Lane.
JF:cl
13
I
SiAxlt'or
coum or cm
g� A*,"'*
41
1V
arsc 3Q. 41 ergs jaL^e:$ kj? uo. zto' jt smrmix n ra s P. ;a a TO Ix-,"
kvu cy WrItUx jUM 3AX (F V.S thM ivi: ;P.L mulDlo;;.
1 41 Ck A,
0, Joe
ml CCCCccwn. mr.A�M-
0. .4-kim �ww-
So"To L#p- 00 LoAof. LAS"
—ilA;lI
q�A
V11-
4,or-
No -41
erS5,0
T04
SiAxlt'or
coum or cm
g� A*,"'*
41
1V
0. .4-kim �ww-
SiAxlt'or
coum or cm
g� A*,"'*
41
1V
• a�'i
rss. _ rtK
ova x _.,ca
. r
� �. � `�,.� ��� _�• .`�� � Wit' ��
t
s
THE PF{11 LAR NEF,'TF,\"G OF' THE
F APPEALS
7111A ('\ E' 7
Hear].ng r1 ate, Jul% 18, 1991
P F 17 1'"C T:0 \� E, R Frank
PPOPERT)' d'05 South AudT,ey
P1,E1_j('AT1(,)\1 DATE' � July 2, 1991
RL.QUFST: Variations from Section 11.1102
to allow a 23'-6" front yard
setback rather than 100' as
required by Code. Section
14.1102 to allow a 69-9"
sideyard setback rather than
9.25' as required by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENTGilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSEN"T: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.1102 to
allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30' as required
by Code; Section 14.1102 to allow a 6'-9" sideyard setback
rather than 9.25' as required by Code.
The petitioner, Mr. Frank DiVita of 205 9�. Audrey Ln.,
presented his case stating that he would like to build an
addition onto an. existing one -car garage. Mr. DiVita stated
that he is on a pie shaped and it is difficult to build any
thing without a variation of his front and side yards.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the applicant is on a wedged shape lot with a
curved front yard.. Because the side lot line is angled it
would not be possible to construct another garage bay without
a sideyard encroachment. Miss Farnham stated staff suggested
that the applicant consider adding toward the back rather
than the front to achieve the desired garage length. This
would reduce the variation request for the front yard
setback. She noted that the front lot line is curved and even
if the addition were flush with the existing house, some
7
July 1B, 1991
page 2 of 2
encrosehment into the front 5QuId resuln
d a ton -car
Lannon questioned 9hy the 10011cant nee
garage,
Mr. DiVita stated that Ite owns qhppe cars.
F
t, (10 'jis hcuse
%1r',Lannon asked if than had Qj0',V."in,4
Wa
perty value.
beLng up for sale to Qo
prve the b
7
Mr. Divita stated that'he wany9d the two -car garage before he
PUT his hal;$E, L�p fc-)r sole.
The Board then generally diselfwW4the case.
VI , w fa%vr of a 6.5,
1r. Lannon stated he t uld nal holth
reduction in the requ,Qdfroht jyxd. He also for stated concerns
atarnWspeculative [p,r,6,ject being bout the propose c4fructIOW
Purposes.
mo
Chajrmi.in Basnik then ehte,rtaA4,44 , t i 0 n tri grant the
2 3 front yard setback rather
petitioners request f"O"r a 7�
"d J :Qawn on petitioners exhLbif
than 30' as required by W 0, 9:151
'grettrag�",,6ti seconded.
Mr. Lannon moved� r7 I
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: one
8,,jano, yssidy,
SAYS: Lannon,j'
Br tetra r,,,',Skowroa, Bashik
%lotioned denied by a �Vote. of 7
the
ChaLrman Basnik then antertaij 41141, motion to grant
1% 1, than
9� Qdeyard setbalk rather
petitioners request W
9,251 as required by
Mr. Erettrager mc)ved. Mr. LanOn'4econded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES:,&annon,?r&t, Sayiano, c,ssidy,
ArettragierhSkowron, Sasnik
SAYS! "Tone
Moon ar
ticried by a I,,
l6te of 714
This case must still be heardl I behre the village Board.
Lf beware
i Ngdb*lle Thompson
;9
V LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT'
IL
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN M
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 11, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-37-V-91
APPLICANT: FRANK DI VITA
ADDRESS: 205 SOUTH AUDREY LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 10,839 sq. ft
% COVERAGE: 35.4%; 23% front yard proposed
F.A.R. : 0.23
IF
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUES
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of an
addition to the existing one -car garage:
1. Section 14.1102 to allow a 23'-6" front yard setback rather than 30 ft. as required by
Code.
2. Section 14.1102 to, allow a 6'-9" sideyard setback rather than 9.25 ft. as required by
Code.
I
141*WWW_W#VMU
Summary of application: 'The applicant is proposing to construct an addition to an existing
one -car garage. Four feet will be added to the front and 10.5 feet to the side to create �
twat -car garage. The proposed addition will encroach 6.5 ft. into the required 30 ft. front
yard and 2.25 ft. into the required 9 ft. sideyard.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is wedge-shaped
with a curved frontage, The lot frontage is 90.5 ft. which requires a 9 ft. sideyard. Staff
notes that the lot is 82 ft. wide at the building line which would require an 8.2 ft. sideyard.
The existing house was built parallel to the north lot line. Consequently, the angle of the
south lot line results in varied setbacks. The addition is proposed on the south side of the
existing garage with setbacks ranging from 11 ft. to 6%9" which accommodates the 2 ft, eave
overhang.
The garage addition will also encroach into the required 30 ft. front setback. Because the
lot frontage is curved, the encroachment varies from 3.42 ft. to 6.5 ft. with the front yard
reduced to 23'-6" at the closest point. Staff notes that the existing garage encroaches
1'-1011," into the front yard because of the curved frontage. The addition is parallel to the
front of the house, however, the curved frontage results in an increased encroachment.
Other homes in the block appear to have maintained the required 30 ft. front setback. The
proposed encroachment would be unique to the area and could set a precedent. Staff notes
that a mix of attached, one -car and detached two -car garages exist on the block.
It might be possible to eliminate the front yard encroachment by making some interior
design modifications which would add depth to the existing 20 ft, long garage. Or the
existing garage could remain as currently existing and the new bay be lengthened by adding
more to the back rather than extending forward.
Another alternative would be to construct a detached garage in the rear yard. The lot has
sideyards wider than 10 ft. which would allow installation of a driveway. A detached garage
could be located in the rear yard without variations. However, because of the depth of the
property, lot coverage would be increased substantially.
The applicant should address the feasibility of these alternatives.
U
Gil Basnik, Chair -man
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The applicant is also proposing a 1,106 sq. ft. room addition and 253 sq. ft. deck. Tlese
improvements meet all Zoning Code requirements.
OTHER VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
No major concerns or objections were stated by other Village staff. Engineering notes that
downspouts should be directed toward the front or back.
SUMMay/RECOMMENDATION
Staff has some concerns about the front yard encroachment setting a precedent. Staff notes
that the curved lot frontage contributes to the encroachment. Reconfiguring the garage as
suggested, will meet the needs of the petitioner, and eliminate the front yard variation.
DMC:hg ,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM:
David M. Clements Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT:
ZBA-38-V-91, Daniel Lawlor
LOCATION: 1201 West Busse Avenue
DATE: July 22, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Daniel Lawlor. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.1102 to allow a 21' front yard setback to accommodate an addition to the existing
one -car garage. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 30' front setback.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, Mr. Lawlor explained that he wants to convert his one -car garage into a two -
car garage. He stated that he considered adding to the side or back instead of the front and
believes that adding to the front will result in the least disruption to his property and his
neighbors. He also stated that the proposed design of the addition would blend with the
architecture of his home.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained three alternatives for creating a two -car garage, including:
adding to the side; adding to the back; and building a detached garage in.the rear yard. She
noted that variations were needed for all alternatives except the detached garage. She also
noted that the proposed 9' encroachment into the front yard would be unique to the
neighborhood.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that the proposed addition would
blend architecturally with the existing house. However, they expressed concerns about the
degree of front yard encroachment proposed, as it would significantly alter the character of
the neighborhood and could set a precedent. Accordingly, by a 0-7 vote, the Zoning Board
of Appeals recommends denial of a variation to Section 14.1102 to allow a 21' front setback
to accommodate an addition to the existing garage at 1201 West Busse Avenue.
JF:cl
/I
rfF fN
`
�V
A
{
A
R
Y...
.... ... '
-_...
*ti's. C :�
`""'.'"""'^................._.
.......... „.., ....
+
M '
� f
y
Alk3#f
AM
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 38-V-91 Hearing Date: July 18, 1991
PETITIONER: Daniel Lawlor
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1201 W. Busse Ave.
PUBLICATION DATE: July 2, 1991
REQUEST: Variance from section 14.1102
to allow a 21' front yard
setback to accommodate an
addition onto the existing
garage and home.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variance from Section 14.1102 to
allow a 21' front yard setback to accommodate an addition
onto the existing garage and home.
The petitioner, Daniel Lawlor of 1201 W. Busse Ave., stated
that he presently has a one and a half car garage and -ould
like to build an addition extending 9' from the front of the
existing house, Mr. Lawlor stated that he has two cars now
and a daughter driving now and a son who will be driving neNt
year and foresees the need for his to accommodate
four cars. Mr. Lawlor stated that he has looked at other
options as suggested by staff and feels this is best way to
go.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that this addition will allow construction of a tandem
two -car garage. Miss Farnham stated that the requested 9'
front yard enproachment could set a precedent in the
neighborhood since there are no other front yard
encroachmentse Miss Farnham then presented the options to
the Board:
Option 1: Add to front (applicants proposal)
-Requires front yard
front yard is signi:
neighborhood, Could,
-Add:"s ti or, can be coni
the existing usable
-addition would cove
yoverage
-
Architectural style
neighborlooK
option 2- Add to sid
-Addition to side'o
at the narrowest p
sideyard.
-Side addition woul,
between the houses
-the required 30' f
Option 3- Add to
-Addition to back c
sideyard variance
-Adding to the bacl
and OCOLPY an eW
-The reqKired 30' 1
Opticn 4- Construct
-A two -car detache(
an meet all zonim
-The garage would I
yard, reducing the
-The existing gam
use because the Z(
lot. the Existing
-The required 30'
Miss Farnham thanke
suggested by staff,
The Board then gene
Mr. jAw1or stated
the house and nei
Mr, Lannon stated t
could create a char,
Lannon stated that,
neighborhood and he
f exis
arage
t. Sta
f exis
arage
uired
etas
rags
nuir
sable �
would I
ig Ord
iveway
at yari
he app
ly dis
it i
er ch
notic
n't s
ZBA-38-V-91
July is, 1991
Page 2 of 3
ion. Proposed 21' deep
cent than others in the
it significantly altering
iment and not increase lot
ig garage is common in.
rarage
reduce sideyard to I'-10"
inot support such a narrow
7 reduce the open space
I be maintained.
garage
reduce sideyard to 61
removal of a large tree
a.
d be maintained.
age
be placed in the rear yard
the center of the back
f the lot,
o be remodeled for another
only allows one garage per
also have to be removed.
d be maintaineK
for addressing the options
I the case,
?d ad.d"Ltion would compI.I.Mell,
-y attractive design but it
,i the neighborhood. Mr.
one -car garages in the
such a large encroachment.
0
ZBA-38-V-91
July 18, 1991
Page 3 of 3
into the front yard.
Mr. Brettrager agreed with Mr. Lannon.
Mr. Cassidy stated that he can't support a front yard
encroachment.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to allow a 21' front setback to
accommodate an addition onto the existing garage and home.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: None
NAYS: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 0-7.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
V,k-.;,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEk—
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN MK_�
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 11, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-38-V-91
APPLICANT: DANIEL LAWLOR
ADDRESS: 1201 WEST BUSSE AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R. :
- ----------
R-1 Single Family Residential
9,447 sq. ft.
30.9%; 25.2% front yard proposed
0.27
I
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
"fie applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102 to allow a 21 foot front setback
to accommodate an addition onto the existing garage and home. The Zoning Ordinance
requires a 30 ft. front setback.
Summary of application: The applicant is'proposing to construct an addition to the front
of the existing house and garage. The addition will allow the existing garage to be
converted into a tandem, two -car garage. It will also provide an entry porch and space for
an additional bathroom.
As proposed, the addition will extend 9 feet into the required 30 foot front yard setback.
The interior length of the proposed tandem garage is 38 ft. which allows two, 19 ft. parking
stalls.
Surrounding A►.rea Development and Potential Impact: Visual inspection of the
neighborhood indicates that other homes in the area have front setbacks at or near the 30
foot required by Code. The proposed 9 ft. encroachment would be significantly different
and could set a precedent for additions onto other homes. Staff does note that many homes
are designed with protruding garages, so the proposed style of the addition would not
appear out of character.
The applicant has four options to create a two -car garage. One is to add to the front as
proposed; the second is to add to the side; the third is to add to the back; and the fourth
is to construct a detached garage in the rear yard. Following is a brief assessment of the
four options:
Option 1: Add to front (applicants proposal)
-Requires front yard setback variation. Proposed 21 ft. deep front yard is significantly
different than others in the neighborhood. Could set a precedent.
-Addition can be constructed without significantly altering the existing usable yard space.
-Addition would cover existing pavement and not increase lot coverage.
-Architectural style with protruding garage is common in neighborhood.
Option 2; Add to side of existing garage
-Addition to side of garage would reduce sideyard to 1'40" at the narrowest point.
-Side addition would significantly reduce the open space between the houses.
-The required 30 ft. front yard would be maintained.
Option 3: Add to back of existing garage
-Addition to back of garage would reduce sideyard to 6 ft.
-Adding to the back would require removal of a large tree and occupy an existing patio
area.
-The required 30 ft. front yard would be maintained.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
Option 4; Construct a detached garage
-A two -car detached garage could be placed in the rear yard and meet all zoning
requirements.
-The garage would be located near the center of the back yard, reducing the usable area
of the lot.
-The existing garage would have to be remodelled for another use because the Zoning
Ordinance only allows one garage per lot. The existing driveway would also have to
be removed.
-The required 30 ft. front yard would be maintained.
The applicant has considered these options and believes that adding to the front will be the
least disruptive to the existing property and not significantly impact the affected neighbor
to the west. The applicant also indicated that the proposed 9 ft. depth of the addition is
critical. The family's vehicles are not compact and the 19 ft. stall depth is needed to allow
enough space to stack two vehicles.
Staff notes that the standard parking stall size defined by the Zoning Ordinance is 18 ft.
long. Shortening the proposed 19 ft. stalls to 18 ft. would reduce the front yard
encroachment by 2 feet. Depending on the types of vehicles and amount of storage space
needed, shorter stalls may be feasible. The applicant should address this suggestion.
Staff notes that the remaining 21 ft. front yard is deep enough to accommodate vehicles
parking on the driveway without overhanging the sidewalk. Staff also notes that the overall
and front yard lot coverage are well below the maximum allowed by Code.
QTHER E ST,.kFF COMMENIS
No major objections or concerns were stated by other staff. Engineering suggests that
downspouts be directed toward Busse Avenue.
SUMMA&YIRECOMMENDATION
Any addition would require yard setback variations due to the irregular shape of the lot and
the position of the house. Staff believes that adding to the front would have the least
impact on the existing usable area of the lot, but the proposed 9 ft. encroachment would be
unique to the established neighborhood character and could set a precedent. The need for
a two -car garage is understandable, but this should be done without such a large variation.
Staff requests that the applicant address the feasibility of Options 3 and 4.
MUSE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS'eECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John F. Dixon, Village Manager
WL,
FROM:
David M. Clements; Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT:
ZBA-39-V-91, George Steil
LOCATION:
1050 South Linneman Road
DATE:
July 22, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by George Steil. The applicant is requesting the following
variations to accommodate paving of an existing circular driveway at 1050 South Linneman
Road:
1) Section 1.4.3016 to allow a circular driveway.
2) Section 14.1102.A to allow 48% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as allowed
by code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, George Steil explained that the circular drive provided additional parking space
and eliminated the need to back onto Linneman Road. He also stated that the existing
gravel circular driveway was installed about ten years ago when the house was built.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that additional parking space could be provided by widening
the existing driveway which is narrower than code allows. She also noted that paving the
existing gravel driveway would improve it's appearance.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that traffic on Linneman Road
gets quite busy during rush hours and the circular driveway had merit for safety purposes.
Accordingly, by a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
variations requested to accommodate a circular driveway at 1050 South Linneman Road.
JF:cl
i
i
p �d of I 3
7
f 94
4
v _CAj�
o
}'
(Of
17217
Ordered
Oro'er No 1'lt,ri5--J.-_-
Base Scale f inch = .0 feet
Data —A!!–Ch _. X479
1-1- Ali pOtNTS flEFORE eV)i DING BY SAME AND AT ONCE REPORT ANY
4 H I MAN fi
STATE OF ILLINOIS ss "'
COUNTY OF COOK
! JAMES M. ELLMAN, do hareby certify that I have surveyed
the above described property and that the plat hereon drawn is
a correct representation of said survev
r1�
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 39-V-91 Hearing Date: July 18, 1991
PETITIONER: George Steil
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1050 South Linneman Road
PUBLICATION DATE: July 18, 1991
REQUEST: Variations from Section 14.3016
to allow a circular driveway.
Section 14.1102.A to allow 489
front yard lot coverage rather
than 35% as allowed by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016 to
allow a circular driveway and Section 14,1102.A to alloS,: 48%
front yard lot coverage rather than 351 as allowed by Code.
The petitioner, George Steil of 1050 South Linneman Road,
presented his case stating that he would like to pave
an existing gravel circular driveway. Mr. Steil stated that
he has a 30' deep front yard.
Mr. Lannon asked the petitioner why he needs a circular
dr, iveway.
Mr. Steil stated that he has 6 children who have cars, and
lives on Linneman Road which during rush hour can be ver,,-,
busy. Mr. Steil also stated that he lives on the curve on
Linneman Road. and it's difficult to see (-ars coming around
the curve.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that there is an existing gravel circular driveway
which the applicant wants to pave. Miss Farnham stated that.
the existing driveway leading back to the garage is narrower
it
than Code allows So ,01 t
parking pad. This mold
without ta;a: yet, needing varia0i(,I
circular r ri veway is Ali
improve its looks. �%
The Board then geness.' M
r,
Mr. 'Lannon stated thIA
north property line to
Chairman ai rman k asn l then; �n1
petitioners request ,r
front yard lot coveta e
„�
Mr. Cassidy- moved. fir,
;J
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES, T L,
B
Motion carried by a te ox
This case must still ( e h.ea
H,
r
It
J
,1
r
ZBA-39-VO91
Jisly 18,J991
Page 2 of 2
be added to ,create a
litinal parking spaces
o
so noted that the gravel
and 'paving it would'
the petitioners request.
should be planted along the:
impact on the neighbor.
motion to grant the
driveway and to allow 489
d;e&
t, Saviano, C"assidY,;
Skowron, Basnik
)re the
t1l e Tho
ling Sec
V.,.;,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE,-,'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
FAX:
R-1 Single Family Residential
751 x 1721 (12,912 sq. ft.)
44.7%; 48% front yard proposed
N/A .
-5
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals'
Page 2
R.
The applicant is requesting the following v i ariations to accommodate a circular driveway:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow 48% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as allowed
by Code.
PNG AND ZONING C!QMMENTS ANQ CONCERNS
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to pave an existing gravel circular
driveway. Circular driveways are only permitted by variation. In addition, a variance to
allow 48% front yard lot coverage is required to accommodate the proposed additional
pavement.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The lot is located at the point where
Linneman Road begins to curve. The applicant states that visibility is restricted and the
circular drive would eliminate the need to, back onto Linneman Road. The circular drive
is also requested to provide space to park vehicles without blocking the existing driveway
which occupies most of the 12 ft. sideyard, between the house and the south lot line.
Staff notes that there is an existing gravel circular driveway on this property. Paving it
would likely improve it's existing appearance. However, additional parking area could he
provided without variations.
A driveway width of 21 ft. is permitted for wo-car garages. Most of the driveway is only
12 ft. wide. An additional 9 ft. of pavement could be added either behind the house or in
the front yard to provide a parking pad.
Staff notes that widening the driveway in the front yard might require the removal of some
existing landscaping. Widening the driveway behind the house would slightly reduce the
usable backyard space. The applicant should address the feasibility of these alternatives.
Staff further notes that some landscaping and berming have been installed in the front to
screen the circular drive from the street. However, no landscaping is provided between the
driveway and the affected neighbor.
OTHER VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
No major objections or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
SnIMARY/RE, OMMENDATION
Staff typically supports requests for circular driveways on properties fronting on busy arterial
streets. While this lot is near a curve, Linneman Road does not carry a large volume of
traffic and is not classified as an arterial. For purposes of creating additional parking area,
staff notes that the driveway could be widened by 9 feet to provide a parking pad without
variations. The applicant should address this alternative.
Staff notes that a gravel circular driveway currently exists on the lot and paving it would
likely improve it's appearance.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
M_
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 19, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-40-SU-91, ZBA-41-V-91, ROBERT & DONNA GOTHAM
LOCATION: 625 MEIER ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use Permit and variation applications filed by Donna and Robert Gotham. The
applicants are requesting a Special Use Permit per Section 1,4.1001.C.7 to allow a three -
car garage, and a variation to Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 34 ft. wide driveway rather than
21 ft. as permitted by Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 18, 1991. At
the meeting, Donna and Robert Gotham stated that they recently purchased the property
at 625 Meier Road and want to construct a three -car garage and associated wider driveway.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the Zoning Ordinance only allows three -car garages by
Special Use Permit and that wider driveways are also needed to accommodate the wider
garage. She noted that.this is a very large lot and that lot coverage and setbacks are well
within the Code requirements.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that the requested driveway width
of 34 ft. would only be in front of the garage to provide a turn -around. The remainder of
the driveway would maintain the existing width of approximately 18 feet, as shown on the
site plan submitted.
Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a Special
Use Permit to allow a three -car garage and a variance to allow a 34 foot wide driveway at
625 Meier Road.
DMC:hg
140,
" A
MINUTES OF THE REMAAR MEETVT OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
7BA CKE NO. 10 -SU -91
Hearimg iMtc: Ju"' 18, 1991
ti -V-91
PETITIONER:
Robert and Donna Gotham
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
625 Meier Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 2, 1991
REQUEST:
Special Use permit per Section
14,100I.0.7 to allow a three -car
garage. Variation from Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow a 34' wide
driveway rather than 21' as
permitted by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaile Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
time
OBJECTORKINTERESTED PARTIES :None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a Special Use permit per Section
14A0WC,7 to allow a three -car garage. And a Variation from
Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 31' wide driveway rather than
21' as permitted by Code.
The petitioners, Robert and Donna Gotham of 3721 N.
Greenview, Chicago stating that they have recently purchased
the property at 625 Meier Road and their request is for a
garage and driveway width of 34' to get into the
garage. Mr. Gotham stated that they have three cars and two
children who mill be driving soon.
julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that this is a very large lot and all setbacks are
mnre than sufficient. Miss Farnham stated that the existing
,garage KIL'be converted to living, space and the lot coverage
is t;k-1.1 1:)elow the requirement.
Mr. Lannon questioned if the 34drinwaY ividth will go all
the wa�- to the' St;FF'0,t.
/ AE
1
I li
J
i
"`"
,,
'
! lBA- 10-S[,-91
of
j
j"BA-41-4'-9;1
ur
.July 18, 1991
Page 2 of 2
`lr. Gotham slaty--2d
r;
PIN
tha,
t fe, ajjron in (rant `afthe garage
w.i l l be 31'.
,jtast
Chairman Bisnik
then 'tertaa
�ed a motion to grant the
'7C t:it ioners requestrequestst
f�Yjr a �.5pe
«]Cali Use for 'a three-car
P�'
rage
/
Mr. Cassidy moved.
:Mrd%Pratt
d.
tcobdegg
/a
UPON Ft CJ 1,L TALL
A" a.`r/1 xannon,
Praia , Cassidy, S"a%iana,
l rets r
a V r, slcowron, Basnilr
N. SYS j"Non
1c7t.Lan carried1>1'
tH
IN,
a ��te cif
r
Chairman Basn.ik,
Nw,
then 6,ht,ertaa
A motion to grant the;
petitioners request
t,/g,allow
� ' wide driveway.
i �,
.r. Brettrager
moved=: j1rs, sk'r4
seconded.
UPON POLL CALL:
"
AYES—gr
O,
Cassidy, +aviano,
;
rettr
i„
i=a ,� Skowron, Basnik
NAVS'tiMone
:Motion carried
by a ;v`of
I;
1% '
ii
[ lljp
This casemust
sta 11;6 hear
pre the Uzllage Board.
i
Qz
Ioll hlelle Thompson
f'c6*1
ing Secretary'
�, % "
% o
Nil
if
!
V, '
J j ;
m
f
j
Xj
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 11, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-40-SU-91, ZBA41-V-91
APPLICANT: ROBERT AND DONNA GOTHAM
ADDRESS: 625 MEIER ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
=7F
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X, Single Family (large lot)
LOT SIZE: 193.58' x 331.58' (64,000 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 12%
F-A—R.: 0.10
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQ =
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit per Section 14.1001.C.7 to allow a three -
car garage.
The applicant is also requesting a variation to Section 14.3016.A-3 to allow a 34 ft. wide
driveway rather than 21 ft. as permitted by Code.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMEMAND CONCERNIi
Summary of application: The applicants purchased an existing house and plan to make
some significant improvements to the property. Besides room additions, the applicant is
proposing to construct an attached three -car garage and 34 ft. wide driveway for access to
the garage.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The property is zoned R -X and
consists of a very large (64,000 sq. ft.) lot. The proposed new garage will be approximately
865 sq. ft. (25' x 34V). The garage will be set back 86+ feet from the front lot line and 31+
feet from the side lot line. The existing garage will be converted to living area. Another
existing old garage on the property will continue to be used as a storage building.
The proposed 34 ft. wide driveway is needed to maneuver vehicles in and out of the three -
car garage which is perpendicular to the rest of the home.
Staff notes that the applicant will dedicate 40 ft. of right-of-way along Meier Road and
connect to Village utilities. However, street improvements, including paving, curb and
gutter, and sidewalks will be installed at the time street improvements are required for the
remaining three unimproved properties directly to the south. The Village does not realize
any significant benefit by requiring these improvements on a lot by lot basis. Instead, a
covenant will be drafted to guarantee that the improvements are made at the appropriate
time.
=ER VILLAGE STAFF COMME
The only concerns expressed by'other Village staff relate to the right-of-way dedication and
street improvements. The applicant has discussed these issues with other staff and is aware
of the requirements in this regard.
Staff has no objections to the proposed three -car garage and 34 ft. wide driveway. The lot
is very large and the proposed construction should not appear out -of -scale or have any
negative impact on the surrounding properties. Staff notes that the lot coverage and
setbacks are well within Code requirements.
DMC:hg
0 - W
VILL-,,-iGE OF MOUNT PRO:, -,EC
Te
4
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT I
Mount Prospect, Illinois
A""""*✓
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager WL
FROM:O David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-42-V-91, Walter Szarowicz - Appeal of Zoning Board Dedsion
LOCATION: 748 Whitegate Court
DATE: July 24, 1991
At their meeting of July 18, 1991, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted 3-4 to deny variations
requested by Walter Szarowicz to accommodate widening of an existing driveway at 748
Whitegate Court. The following variations were denied:
1) "-Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 25' wide driveway rather than 21' as permitted by
code.
2) //Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot, coverage rather than 45% as permitted by code
3) Section 14.1102 to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted
by code.
Subsequently, Mr. Szarowicz filed an application to appeal the decision of the Zoning Board
of Appeals.
Following is a summary of the testimony regarding this case presented at the public hearing
on July 18, 1991.
At the meeting Mr. Szarowicz explained that he needs the additional driveway width to
accommodate his family's vehicles and to park a fishing boat and trailer on a paved surface
as required by code, without blocking the garage. He stated that his existing driveway is 18'
wide and he is proposing to add 7'.
Mr. Szarowicz also stated that he stores the boat during the winter (October 1 to March 31)
and uses it most weekends during the rest of the year.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the proposed 25' wide driveway is 4' wider than code
allows. Three feet of pavement could be added to the existing driveway without a variance
for driveway width. However, the lot currently exceeds the maximum 45% lot coverage
permitted. Therefore, any additional pavement results in the need for a lot coverage
variation. In addition, many requests for driveway width variations also result in the need
for a front yard lot coverage variation.
ZBA-42-V-91 - Walter Szarowicz
Page Two
July 24, 1991
Ms. Farnham also noted that this variation request was filed in response to a complaint
about parking the boat trailer on the grass. Because this lot has side yards less than T wide,
it would he difficult to manoeuver the boat into the rear yard without going through the
neighbor's yard. It would also require removal of parts of an existing fence.
Four neighboring residents were present at the meeting to express concerns about the
proposed driveway widening. They had concerns about this driveway being wider than all
others on the block and about parking of a boat and trailer on the driveway.
101.111115110NO lialmill I
WHINNN111111maw, I "I WIN
est. It was noted that Village Codes do not
iveway. Some members stated that similar
granted in the past. Some concerns were
Accordingly, by a 3-4 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of the
variations request by 'Walter Szarowicz m accommodate widening of the driveway at 748
Whitegate Court.
The Zoning Ordinance states that "any individual may file an appeal of the (Zoning Board
of Appeals) decision with the Village Board". Such appeal must be filed within 15 days of
the Zoning Board meeting. Mr. Szarowicz-met this timetable.
All objectors who spoke at the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting have been notified of the
appeal.
To overturn the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals, an extraordinary vote of the
Village Board is required.
In conjunction with the appeal filed, Mr. Szarowicz submitted an alternative plan for
widening his driveway. The alternative plan indicates that the driveway be tapered from 25'
next to the garage to 21' at the property line (please see attached site plan). The driveway
would be 25' wide for a total length of 17' and then taper to a width of 21'. This would
result in an overall lot coverage of 48.5% (48.8% originally requested) and a front yard lot
coverage of 38.9% (39.9% originally requested).
Another alternative would be to only widen the driveway to 21' which is the maximum width
permitted by code. This would eliminate,the driveway width variation and the front yard
lot coverage variation. However, a variance would still be needed to allow additional lot
coverage which would total 47.3% of the lot area, 2.3% more than code permits.
M
P'
t#Eff , 0
K s�
MSL 4 W'1 f �. i'; I foL �f: .
r
3
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 42-V-91
Hearing Date: July 18, 1991
PETITIONER:
Walter Szarowicz
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
748 Whitegate
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 2, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow 25' wide
driveway rather than 21' as
permitted by Code. Section
14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot
coverage rather than 45% as
permitted by Code. Section
14.1102.A to allow 39.9% front
yard lot coverage rather than
35% as permitted by Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variances from Section 14.3016.A.2
to allow a 25' wide driveway rather than 21' as permitted by
Code; Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather
than 45% as permitted by Code and Section 14,1102.A to allot,
39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as permitted by
Code.
The petitioner, Walter Szarowicz of 748 Whitegate, presented
his case stating that he moved from Chicago to Mount Prospect
in April of 1991. He stated that he owns a fishing boat w,,hich
he had parked next to the driveway. Mr. Szarowicz stated that
his boat is 17' long and 4' off the ground. Mr. Szarowicz
stated he would like to widen his driveway to park his boat.
which is currently in the garage, Mr. Szarowicz stated that
he also has four cars.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the Codes require trailers to be parked on a
5
q�
g
0
paved surface. Miss'", nham'
proposing 7' of addn't anal p
driveway. Miss Farm un stat
maximum lot coverage 1so
maximum which is comm when
standard sized lots 'Iss Fa
applicant addross w�i,her a
Permitted by Cbde wolf meet
could be tapers froit'to,
Wes Pinchot, 747 Whit ate,,
cliaracter of the nei-g borhoo
petitioner canmake "h e r a r
Mr. Lannon asked Mr.,
�
J`1111,
driveway width or th, 6 111,boat.
Mr. Pinchot stated ttilllltl he °i
that other driveways �',"-ern the
'
David Lindgren, 743 Oitegat
being parked on the
��,civewAy
homes and the appeara
e o f
44
AnLhotiy Nudo, 742 Wh'iliiegate,
boat parked on the dr veway.
RI
Margaret Szostak, 741/]/"
Wh i te 9
wider driveway is notlffif,
IR in coy,
2/1
block.
The Board suggested—,,' park
Mr. Clements, Direct of PI
that it must be parker( on a
Miss Farnham statedat "the
JR,
1�
fence make it almost,;#mpossl,
4
Z
yard without trespas4
,,I,ng an
Mr. Pratt asked when he st(
Mr. Sz-arowicz stated ,.hat h(
south side from Oct6- ',,r I t(
home from April 1 to,I`epteml
weekend during this'' 'Iftme.
"N/
Mr. Pinchot stated hikl does i
reques tNO.
jffi
N
that the
t to the e
t the lot
yard cover
riveways a
suggested
de dri.vewa
eeds, or i
at the
nchot f
s to st
Ys concern
erned abou
meet Code
ted that h
decrease t
ighborhood
that he d
tated that
y with the
the rear v
g and Zonin
surface.
ow sideyard
o get the b
eighbors pr
t in the wi
es it in a
h 31. He Pa
and typica
e a hardshi
ZBA-42-IV-91
July 18, 1991
Page 2 of 3
itioner is
ting 181 wide
at the
is over the
widened on
t the
which is
he drivewa%
t alters the
s the I
I the boat.
with the
)oth, noting
width.
'eels the boat
value of the
ncat like the
ie proposed
>st of the
stated�
ind exi'sting
t, into the back
=_rty.
rina on, the
it at. his
uses 'it every
in this
9
ZBA-42-V-91
July 18, 1991
Page 3 of 3
The Board then generally discussed the petitioners request.
Mr. Lannon stated that the Village permits trailers on a
paved surface and about a month ago the Zoning Board approved
a similar request. Mr. Lannon stated that the petitioner has
agreed to taper the driveway width.
Mr. Brettrager stated he has concerns on the lot coverage.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brettrager, Skowron
NAYS: Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 3-4.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
N
NI'LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL4-f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN PC—/
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
JULY 11, 1991
ZBA42-V-91
WALTER SZAROWICZ
748 WHITEGATE COURT
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
F.A.R.:
uuuuuut
���JI �I Ir�'�I
7 --- --j r ---q
----1H
T7
t---) r-7-1 F-1 I
R-1 Single Family Residential
67.751 x 1201(8,130 sq. ft.)
48.8% (proposed); 39.9% (proposed front
N/A
N
f
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate widening of an existing
driveway:
1. Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 25 ft. wide driveway rather than 21 ft. as permitted by
Code.
2. Section 14.1102.E to allow 48.8% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code.
Section 14.1102.A to allow 39.9% front yard lot coverage rather than 35% as
permitted by Code.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to add 7 ft. of pavement to his existing
18 ft. wide driveway. The resulting 25 ft. wide driveway increases the front yard lot coverage
from 29.5% to 39.9% and the overall lot coverage from 46.5% to 48.8%. Variations are
required to allow this additional lot coverage'.
The wider driveway is intended to accommodate the family's four vehicles and fishing boat.
Staff notes that this application Was filed in response to a complaint about parking the boat
-trailer on the grass.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The proposed 7 feet of additional
pavement will line up with a sidewalk along the west side of the house which is .83 ft. from
the lot line. A strip of grass about 7 feet wide will remain between the parking pad and the
neighbor's garage.
The sideyard setbacks are less than 7 feet wide on this lot and the rear yard is entirely
fenced. For these reasons it could be difficult to transfer the boat and trailer to the rear
yard without removing the fence and going through the neighbor's yard.
Staff notes that no other driveways in the immediate block have been widened for parking
pads. Because the existing driveway is only 18 feet wide, three more feet could be added
without a variation. The applicant should discuss the need for a driveway wider than 21
feet.
A front yard lot coverage variation is necessary in most cases where a driveway is widened
on a standard -sized lot. The overall lot coverage variation is needed because the existing
lot has a non -conforming lot coverage. Any additional pavement would require a lot
coverage variation on this lot.
No major comments or objections were stated by other Village staff. Engineering notes that
the existing drainage pattern flows from west to east. Additional driveway pavement may
not alter this pattern.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The applicant has a boat and trailer that must be parked on a paved surface. This request
is an attempt to provide a parking area without blocking the garage. Staff notes that 3 feet
of additional pavement could be added without a variation to driveway width or front yard
lot coverage. The applicant should address whether a 21 foot wide driveway meets his
needs. Staff further notes that any additionalpavement on this lot results in the need for
a lot coverage variation because the existing I I ot has a non -conforming coverage of 46.5%.
DMC:hg
= -, - --- - 2W-7cr .:+,, '..
W///47F*4cf 6A 77e couRr
A
4*6voy
•
/7,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John F. Dixon, Village Manager �)VLI
FROM:
David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT:
ZBA-43-V-91, Anthony Sacco
LOCATION:
1818 Aztec Lane
DATE:
July 29, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your Consideration their recommendation for
a variance application for a variance application filed by Anthony Sacco, The applicant is
requesting a variance to Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 1' S" side yard to accommodate an
existing deck addition.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting Anthony and Annette Sacco presented testimony in support of their request.
Mr. Sacco explained that the lower tier was added to the main deck to provide a step. He
acknowledged that a permit was obtained for the main deck but not the lower deck. He
also stated that a wood fence was installed to screen the deck from the neighbor. In
addition, the lower deck is located over an existing patio.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the setback requirements were indicated at the time
the permit was issued for the main deck and lower tier was installed in violation of the
required setbacks. She explained that the applicant's lot is severely wedge shaped, with
angled lot lines that result in decreasing side yards and contribute to the need for a
variation. She also noted that the lower deck is only 8" above ground level and will be
screened by a solid fence from the affected neighbor. Staff has concerns with reducing the
side yard so significantly. She suggested that a smaller step would serve the same purpose
and allow a larger side yard.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that the deck addition covers an
existing patio area and doesn't increase lot coverage. Concerns were expressed about the
applicant constructing the lower deck without a permit. It was also noted that the deck will
be screened from the affected neighbor. Accordingly, by a 4-1 vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of a variance to allow a 1' 5" side yard to accommodate a
deck addition at 1818 Aztec Lane.
JF:cl
gS Es S NT Fol PUSLL C
d
179
r w t.W
r s
' 0
Tri .�.—�,._�..,........,...w._.,�._.._......_._.._.. .�_.-,_.�,..��.� ._...._ _... _.._.r........___._ .....-.,.._
r
0,4 '
ZSZ
33
46
r�
°' •�.. 131 a
y
e
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA C\�,-�F 11 0�
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
P E TIT FO \; E R:
Anthony Sacco
SIL'BJECT PROPERTY:
1818 Aztec
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 9, 1991
REQUEST:
Variation from Section
14,1102.8.1 to allow
construction of a deck addition
which will come as close to 11-
5" to the side lot line at the
narrowest point and 81-8" at the
widest point.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14,1102.8.1
to allow construction of a deck addition which will come as
close as 11-5" to the side lot line at the narrowest point
and 81-8" at the widest point.
The petitioner, Anthony Sacco of 1818 Aztec, presented his
case stating that he built a deck in his rear yard with a
permit from the Village. Mr. Sacco stated that he also put a
step from the deck to his yard which is encroaching into his
side yard. Mr. Sacco stated that he didn't realize the step
was to large. He also stated that he installed a fence with a
permit along the side lot line to block the neighbors view.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the main deck was installed with a permit and the
petitioner was notified at that time that the step could not
be put in without a variation. Miss Farnham stated that the
step does make it easier to get down to ground level. Miss
Farnham stated that the fence does screen the deck from the
neighbor but staff feels there will be a maintenance problem
with such a narrow 1.5' sideyard. She noted that th ' e lot is
angled which contributes to the need for the variation but
but staff feels the
Chmiumap BainiK asheC
wi,h,nt pormission FT
Sa-co stated that
which was installed
Sacco stated that he
in his rear yar& Mr,
step was that wide air
area.
Mr. Cassidy asked the
concrete patio.
Mr, Sacco stated that
Mr. Sacco also statec
installed a wood fent
feel he's infringing
Mr. Cassidy stated Q
c
oulI
dn't put in a StE
Mr. Sacco stated he c
informed on the size,
Nr, Lannon stated thr
fence.
Chairman Basnik then
petitioners request I
for construction of a
exhibit 1 1.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES
NAYS
Motion carried by a
This case must still
Z
i
P
nep should be
,hy, he put the
age.
existing patio
e was unincorp
half concrete
A that he did
j to cut the 9
if the deck c
wes cover the
a pie shaped
stated that
iformed by sta
variation.
2ould put in a
t has been scr
a motion to g
sideyard to an
Kcated on pet
nded.
att, Saviano,
fore the Ville
helle Thompsor
rding Secretar
-43-V-9i
25, 1991
2 of 2
screased.
tep in
ader the deck
ated. W
ad half!deck
t realize the
in that
ers the'
acrete Patio.
at and he
doesn't
that he
tep but not
ned with the
nt the
1-8" si deyard
inners !
y
.rd.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN IL -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-43-V-91
APPLICANT: ANTHONY SACCO
ADDRESS: 1818 AZTEC LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 9,433 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 39.8%
F -A -R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting a variation to Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow construction of a deck
addition which will come as close as l'-5" to the side lot line at the narrowest point and 8'-
8" at the widest point. The Zoning Code requires a 10 ft. sideyard setback on this lot.
Summary of application: The applicant is seeking a variation to allow a lower tier on an
existing deck to remain as constructed. The lower tier projects 8 ft. and comes as close as
1%5" to the lot line. The required sideyard on this lot is 10 feet. A permit was obtained
for the main deck structure, however, the lower tier was added without approval.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is severely
wedge-shaped, with a 105 ft. frontage and 30 ft: I rear width. In addition, the house is not
parallel to the lot lines, consequently the sideyards; progressively decrease from front to
rear.
The deck attached to the back of the house is approximately 1.5 ft. off the ground. The tier
which is approximately 8" above grade provides an intermediate step to the ground. The
tier was placed over an existing paved patio. The tier extends less than 2 ft. from the east
facade of the house.
Staff has some concerns about reducing the sideyard so drastically. The remaining I' -F
sideyard could pose maintenance problems and, being half the width of a typical sidewalk,
presents an obstacle to through -traffic, since the tier will also be above grade. To increase
the setback, part of the tier would have to be removed. Staff notes that a solid wood fence
exists along the property line so the deck and tier are screened from the affected neighbor.
Because it is so low to the ground, the tier does not have much bulk, therefore minimizing
the impact on the neighbor. '
OTHER VILLAGE STAFE Q2MAtEM
No major objections or concerns were expressed by other Village staff. If the variance is
granted, a permit should be obtained to validify the tier construction.
Staff has some concerns about reducing the sideyard so significantly. Staff notes that the
wedge -shape of the lot and the angled lot lines contribute to the need for the variance.
If the purpose of the lower tier is to provide a step to the main deck, this could have been
accomplished by a much smaller, lower tier with less encroachment into the sideyard, The
property �#,srne"�vc aware 4f the set4--ck re,�Yiremexts!g amtk*rizet +x tke trigrftallrer3mit,
and installed the lower tier in violation of the required setbacks. Staff recommends that the
lower section be cut back to a 3 ft. width to serve as a step, leaving a 7 ft. sideyard.
MOSOR
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager W1'
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-44-V-91, Gary & Mary Parlakian
LOCATION: 503 South Elmhurst Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Gary & Mary Parlakian. The applicant is requesting the
following variances to accommodate installation of a circular driveway at 503 South
Elmhurst Road:
1. Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow front yard lot coverage of 53.8% rather than 35% as
allowed by Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting Mary Parlakian presented testimony in support of the request. She stated that
it is very difficult and dangerous to back out onto Elmhurst Road. She indicated that the
family has three cars and the 17' wide driveway would allow two cars to be parked side-
by-side without blocking each other. She also stated that a circular driveway would be more
attractive than a parking pad and she would landscape it with flowers and evergreen shrubs.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that circular driveways have merit on busy arterial streets for
safety purposes. She noted that a parking pad could be installed without a variation.
However, to function as a turnaround, it would have to be located near the front lot line.
Staff also noted that overall lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting letters were submitted by two
neighbors objecting to the variations. Concerns were expressed about the amount of front
yard lot coverage proposed and it was noted that a parking pad could be added without
variations. Members also acknowledged that safety should be given careful consideration
on such a busy roadway.
Accordingly, by a vote of 2-3, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends denial of a
variation to allow a circular driveway and 53.8% front yard lot coverage at 503 South
Elmhurst Road.
JF:cl
E3
SURVEY F i.AT108)
TEL. N0. 956.1224
AUER SURVEYING
2045 S. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD.
SUITE 10&A
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005
Lot 3 andthe South half of Lot 2 1n Block 5 in Prospect Park Subdivision No. 1, being
a Subdivision of the West half of the North So rods of the Southwest quarter of 3ectSon
12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook CDunty,
Illinois.
t
5
1
�
x
Y r�
e -w 'r Z or
:-o
�.t. ci '" I �O
��"F`d, ry Y7�.yr: �/va'r"!, c.,8 i✓
a
Order No.
3sF+"art, ,l,re.+,°'w. ' �•
Df1 t
IIAM+1 of Nlinpls a.
CourdY of Cook
Date c
D....... '-p1pI.Y7 ./D
t, a fey.
Ordered RY
Garr 6 iia MB ertaleere
!t, Land Surveyor do hereby certify that a sW"y of
the Was dasfxlbed property hu turn made under
my mmeMslen and that the plat hon nadrown 4 a
Scale 1 inch
s 2 a fes,
Contact represantatlon of "to suralry conoid Ip a
Distances are Shown In feet and deoNnal palls thered.
hlmpermufe of e2' FWrMhen.
Compare all points Wore building and at once report MY dlNrencd.
Subdi"Won Ffats.
"4k'
Easam-W and building limit shown per WORM September 12,
Fteler to D"d, nf`e pollpY atfd Mael Zoning fspdfamrrtts for addkbnm
1990 .Af✓"�4: j
AEG. ILL LAND WAV6V&
Nom• 1lt0
building lined
and 1eNreent ryAtrldtions-
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR `IEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 14-V-91
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
PETITIONER:
Gary and Mary Parlakian
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
503 S. Elmhurst Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 9, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular
driveway. Section _14.11_D2A to
allow a front rdrd'lot coverage
of 53.8% rather than 35% as
allowed by Code. Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow a 17' wide
driveway for a one -car garage
rather than 15' as permitted by
Code.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016.A.1
to allow a circular driveway. Section 1.4.1102.A to allow a
front yard lot coverage of 53.8% rather than 35% as allowed
by Code. Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 17' wide driveway for
a one -car garage rather than 15' as permitted by Code.
The petitioner, Mary Parlakian of 503 S. Elmhurst Road,
presented her case stating that her home is on Elmhurst Road
which is a very busy street and it is difficult to Pull Out
of their driveway, Mrs. Parlakian also stated that they have
three cars and they need more room for parking.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect
stated that the petitioner is requesting three variations.
the first variation for the circular driveway can only be
allowed by variation. She noted that the petitioner lives on
Route 83which is a major arterial road. Circular Drives and
turnarounds are often justified for safety purposes on busy
arterial roads. The second request is to widen the existing
S
f
J
l'
Z B Q
July 25, 091
Page 2 of 14
i
1 z lc r1 r.a. to1III, , . the third request is for
add_t .ona.i_ paving in the front; va�rd. miss Farnham stated
that the first t ar i.at'�i n -could be eliminated by ,putting in a
turn around but woim ha+.e `oo' the middle of
be located in
thee front yard which, ntot he
'cis attractive a a landscaped
he
ii~rru.iar drive. The additional 3 ` o£' pa��ertetit is
needed to allow two ca, to be arked side by side in 'he
driveway. Miss FarnhaYnt'stated that, a similar request was
granted last week on Rl.ess bdil .road and the petitioner ;is
planning to landscap&Pith flo `ers and evergreen shrubs.
i
Chairman Basnik questioned anIED .O.T. hermit for the second
opening and the lik.id of xt, being approved;.
l
David Clements, Dirert'c�=r of Mapping and Zoning,stated that
Last: rear on Route €S3 ��ust sodth ,of L,on:nquist I D.0 .T.
granted a similar resp st.
'qtr. Lannon stated thatalso granted one on Euclid.
Chairman Basnik then ,read a letter from Mr. Peter Kaufman of
555 S, Elmhurst, whichnH9tated th`a.t they have lived there since
nA
1957 and has had no p b,lems lling out canto 'route 834 nor
had any previous owners and n t ai that the petitioner has
several automobiles SHP feels this would depreciate the
property value. �
t
Chairman Basnik then':r ad a letter from L.G. Marinowsk
stating that the cir utar drivq- ay would change the character
of the neighborhood.
Mfr. Saviano asked if,tlae motorists backing out can 'see past
the walk.
„R
Miss Farnham statedtNA the AI11age Code does not allow
cars parked beyond Ql sidewal.k in the right-of-way which
could obstruct vision -W
Mr. Cassidy asked the rpetitioner ,how man}' cars they ha<ve.
Mrs. Parlaki.an!stated�ithat they have 3 cars and Have a very
hard time backing oui%f the G iveway in the morning and
afternoon. Their work hours ire different and ears musit be
shuffled. l'
Mr. Pratt asked the pg itioner°if they understood staffs'
alternative plan of a larking pad.
Mrs. Parlakian stame,21that sho"doesn't think it will look
nice and stated the planning to plant nice flowers and
0
ZBA-44-%'-91
July 25, 1991
Page 3 of 4
shrubs.
Mr. Cassidy stated a concern for the front lot coverage
variation.
Chairman Basnik questioned the hardship of the request.
"Irs. Parlakian stated the hardship is safety and parking.
She also stated that she has counted 4 circular driveways on
Elmhurst Road from Golf Road to Lincoln.
The Board then generally discussed the request.
Mr. Cassidy stated that he objects to the request and feels a
parking pad would be sufficient.
Mr. Lannon and Mr. Saviano stated their concerns for safety.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a variance to Section 14.3016.A.1 to
allow a circular driveway and to Section 14.1102.A to allow
front yard lot coverage of 53.8%.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Saviano
NAYS: Pratt, Cassidy, Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 2-3.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a 17' wide driveway.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Saviano, Cassidy,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
Mr. Cassidy then moved to prepare Resolution number Z-44-91
to record the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the
petitioners request for a 17' wide driveway.
Mr. Pratt seconded.
C,
UP()\POLL CALL: AYES:
NAYS:
Motion carried., by a
This case must still
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIV, CHAIRMAN Vic-'
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-44-V-91
APPLICANT: GARY AND MARY PARLAKIAN
ADDRESS: 503 SOUTH ELMHURST AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
s
H1
7-7
R
-- ` tw
TV
17
t'
` --;
-- - ----, ` N
tl,..
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 75' x 151.8' (11,390 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 26.9%; 53.8% proposed front yard
F.A.R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate a proposed circular
driveway:
Section 14.3016.A.1 to allow a circular driveway.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow front yard lot coverage of 53.8% rather than 35%
as allowed by Code.
3. Section 14.3016.A-3 to allow a I-) ft. wide driveway for a one -car garage rather
than 15 ft. as permitted by Code.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a circular driveway.
Circular driveways are only permitted by variation. The applicants also plan to add 3 ft. to
their existing 14 ft. wide driveway. A maximum width of 15 ft. is permitted for one -car
garages. The proposed additional pavement increases the front yard lot coverage to 53.8%.
Code only allows 35%.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot fronts on
Elmhurst Road (Rt. 83) which is classified as a major arterial. Backing onto Elmhurst Road
could be dangerous since traffic is quite heavy and steady. The house is set back almost 40
ft. from the front lot line. This provides more space for a circular driveway.
In addition to the circular driveway, the applicant would like to increase the width of the
existing driveway to 17 ft. This would allow a car to be parked in the driveway without
blocking the garage. Widened driveways and parking pads are a common request associated
with homes with one -car garages.
The existing front yard lot coverage is 20.4%. The proposed additional pavement will
increase the front yard lot cover to 53.8%. Most requests for driveway widening and circular
drives result in excessive front vard coverage.
An alternative which would reduce or eliminate the variations, would be to construct a
parking pad perpendicular to the existing driveway. A parking pad could be used as a turn-
around and provide a space to park a car without blocking the garage. A parking pad up
to 15 ft. wide, perpendicular to the driveway would not require a driveway width variation.
Staff notes that a parking pad would have to project on the south side of the existing drive,
as the north sideyard is not deep enough to accommodate a fall parking stall. While this
would reduce the amount of paving, it might not look as finished, or formal as the proposed
circular driveway.
Proposals to widen one -car driveways to accommodate two cars are fairly common in
response to the fact that most households today have two or more vehicles. However, if a
circular drive or a parking pad were constructed, the need for the additional driveway width
is less apparent, since a car could be parked on the circular drive and not block the garage.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
OTHER VILL&GE STAEE COMME�M
Inspection Services notes that an additional access onto Elmhurst Road requires a permit
from I.DO.T. No other comments or concerns were expressed by other Village staff.
The proposed circular drive has merit on a lot fronting on a busy arterial road, such as
Elmhurst Road. Staff has some concerns about the amount of front yard coverage resulting
from the proposed additional pavement. Staff requests that the applicant discuss the
feasibility of a parking pad/turn-around and whether it would meet their needs. The
applicant should also justify the need for the additional 3 ft. of pavement on the existing
driveway.
Staff notes that overall lot coverage is well below the maximum allowed.
DMC:hg
q
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Managerf
Wk1_1
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-47-V-91, Ulrich Marks
LOCATION: 600 Carboy Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Ulrich Marks. The applicant is requesting a variation to
Section 14.2202.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' to accommodate a building addition at 600
Carboy Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting, Ulrich Marks presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Marks
explained that he is proposing to construct an 8,918 square foot building addition onto an
existing industrial building. The existing lot is quite small and the size of building addition
proposed is needed to allow maximum space utilization.
Renaldo Manlang, Architect, presented a floor plan and landscape plan. He indicated that
he has discussed the issue of on-site detention with the Village Engineering Department and
believes adequate detention storage can be provided in underground holding tanks.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that this is an existing non -conforming lot in terms of size
which contributes to the need for the variation. She noted that the addition would occupy
a green area currently used for on-site detention. She noted that the proposed addition
would primarily impact a parking lot and that landscaping could be provided to soften it's
impact.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that this is one of the most
attractively kept properties on the block. Some concerns were expressed about detention
requirements, and it was noted that on-site detention standards must be met to obtain a
building permit.
Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a
variance to allow a 10' rear yard at 600 Carboy Road, conditioned on:
1. Landscape plan approval by staff.
JF:cl
Z
a
OF THE REGI -LAR MEETING OF THE
PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZB,,\ C.AS-, IC
Hearing Date: Jul, 25), 1991
PF.T I- TON 1--:R
Ulrich Marks
SUBJECT PROPERTY
600 Carboy
P1_BLICAl"I0\1 LI --\TE:
July 9, 1991
REQ�..'EST:
Variation from Section 14.2202.0
to allow a rear yard of 10' to
accommodate a proposed 8,918
sq.ft. building addition.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14-2202."
to allow a rear yard of 10' to accommodate a proposed 8,918
sq,ft building addition. Code requires a 201 rear yard
setback.
The petitioner, Ulrich Marks of 335 S. Leonard, Arlington
Heights, presented his is case stating that he needs more space
at his present building at 600 Carboy and would like to build
a 8,918 square feet addition.
Renaldo Manalang, Architect for Mr. Marks, stated that the
addition will occupy 10' of the 20' setback. Mr. Manalang
stated that there will still be 10' of space in the rear
yard. Mr. Manalang stated that the petitioner plans to do
extensive landscaping. He also stated that they have talked
to the owner to the rear and they stated no objections. Mr.
Manalang stated that adequate detention will be provided and
they have consulted engineers.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that staff is concerned about the large size of the
addition and that the applicant should justify the need for
the space. Miss Farnham stated that the addition is taking up
major green space currently used for detention. The project
and will have to conform to the detention requirements in
3
l
J
f! ZBh-47-V-91
Ja4y 25, 1091
Poke 2 of 2'
Jig
arder to obtain arc spa builoing per#r She also stated that this
p r per��l y is in n i I' nrns district on a l acre parcel
1
c.&u oh e �: r t r ng r orl'i"01 r mrn not ung current . I-1 standards
c�sZ�zg.rE
pa r 1:, to beacres taff suggests 'pproval be
t L cr approved 1 s c,±a"pin g
c ('.�s�,�.r,y asked if petzti rre'r addressed the staffs
r; r>nc earns,about d.etenk �
Mr. `1analan,g stated tWi -the en ineers feel the building;
addition will not regc" e a lot of additional detention:
noting that the prcapei4 also hos a parking lot anal existing
green space Which can;, utiliz d for detention. Mr. Manalang
stated they mayposszbi put xn'underground culverts for
detention.
Mr. Manalang then pre � ted tr 'Baard'wi.th landscape plan
draw i rigs.
,y
i
Mr. Cassidy asked abo' t`he culverts.
Mr. Clements, director, sf Planning and Zoning stated that
culverts could be use,s" detenion storage.
,Miss Farnham stated tii she taJked to Chuck Bencic of
Inspection Ser,.,ices aMV he also,(�,,mentioned culverts could be
used for this project'
The Board then discus" t and had no objections,
Chairman. Basnik then t,.ertainejd a motion to giant the
petitioners request fbfll a 101 rear yard to accommodate a
proposed 8,918 square; let buil ang addition asppresented on
exhibit #2 subject tp Al landscapplan,approval,by "Village
'i
staff. i
Mr. Pratt moved. Mr silly seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES., ninon, p att, Saviano, Cassidy,
Vinik
NAYS ' /ane
Motion carried by a V"'I, 5 U.
Th-is Case must still a4VI� ieardlb6fore the Villa 'o Board,
Mk6helle Thompson;
Redording Secretary
i
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNII--, CHAIR
MANL PLANNING AND ZONING
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-47-V-91
APPLICANT: ULRICH MARKS
ADDRESS: 600 CARBOY ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1.1 Light Industrial
LOT SIZE: 209' x 2331 (48,900 sq. ft.)
% COVERAGE: 72%
F.A.R. : 0.47
Q
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
John F. Dixon, Village Manager WTI -1
FROM:
David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT:
ZBA-48-SU-91, Rogers Corporate Park
LOCATION:
1840-1894 South Elmhurst Road
DATE:
July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a Special Use Permit application filed by Arthur J. Rogers and Company. The applicant
is requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.) Ordinance #4156 to
allow limited retail uses in Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest comer of Elmhurst
Road and Algonquin Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991.
At the meeting William Schmidt, Chief Executive Officer for A. J. Rogers and Company,
presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Schmidt explained that several
prospective tenants have expressed interest in limited retail uses. In response, A. J. Rogers
and Company would like to allow limited retailing as an accessory to permitted industrial
uses.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the limited retail would
not include day-to-day retail activities that could potentially disrupt other industrial tenants
and create conflicts for available parking. He noted that this property was recently rezoned
from B-3 Commercial District and is surrounded by commercial/retail uses. Subsequently,
retail uses may be generally compatible with the area, but should be reviewed on a case
specific basis for compatibility.
Mr. Clements recommended that limited retail uses be allowed by a field change to the
existing Planned Unit Development. This would allow review by the Village Manager and
the Village Board on a case specific basis.
Mr. Clements stated that staffs major concern was parking. He explained that 165 spaces
are needed to meet parking demand for the proposed 20% office/80% warehouse mix of
uses. He indicated that 211 spaces would be needed to accommodate a 10% retail factor.
The corporate park provides 201 spaces which staff believes will be adequate to meet
anticipated parking demand. He noted that parking impact could be measured through the
field change process.
ZBA-48-SU-91, Rogers Corporate Park
Page Two
July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was noted that many potential limited
retail uses might generate parking demand on weekends rather than during the week when
other tenants are in operation. Ihe Zoning Board concurred with the conditions suggested
by staff. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote,, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of
an amendment to P.U.D. Ordinance #4156 to allow limited retailing, subject to the
following conditions:
1. Field change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence by the Village Board.
2. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the total floor area of an I-1 use.
3. Limited retailing shall be approved in writing by the property owner and property
manager.
4. No additional signs shall be allowed for retail uses.
JF:cI
w
AUGONQUZN
ABT BOUnO Tn�Ff TC —+
ROAD
AR
WCa
fi
A*
A
a
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 48 -SU -91
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Hearing Date: July 25, 1991
Arthur J. Rogers & Co.
1840-1894 Elmhurst Road and
401-501 Algonquin Road
July 9, 1991
An Amendment to Special Use
Ordinance No. 4156 per Section
14.2201.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
Robert Brettra.aer
Micheale Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting an amendment to Special Use
Ordinance No. 4156 per Section 14.2201, The amendment would
allow limited retail in the Rogers Corporate Park Planned
Unit Development, as incidental to a permitted I -I use.
The petitioner, William Schmitz of Arthur J. Rogers & Co,
presented the case stating that Rogers Corporate Park would
like an amendment to allow limited retail uses. Mr. Schmitz
stated that they had a recent client who was going to lease
10,000 square feet but wanted to have retail sales on
Saturdays and Sundays. They lost the client because they
could not accomodate their need for limited retailing. Mr.
Schmitz stated that Arthur J. Rogers & Co. will have total
control over the limited use and no space would be solely
leased as retail, Mr. Schmitz also stated that the Village
would benefit by additional sales tax. He also noted the
potential for spill over effects to other surrounding
retails. Mr. Schmitz stated that there will be no adverse
affect to neighbors or existing tenants and the corporate
park has adequate parking. Mr. Schmitz also stated that they
generally agree with staff recommendations but are requesting
15% of the space as retail to be available for limited.rd-kv,J-
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this would be an amendment to the Planned Unit Development
f
<#F3-i8-SC"-91
ju1'5, 1991
Paget of 3
° r0j)ertt at ,; k urst and Algonquin Roads which was
r-r,z�jod in Marchoaf ' 0 from a F-3 to i-I not%ing that I-I.
a1.1o�w retail `uses. Mr ',Clements stated that
eli Iaet at ia:anea' doesh�e.a prospective client tat
nr:�s@�a'�r Cur ��` rs tt.i'.tchea abinet that would 11ke to ;have ;some
type eat' sht:)t c. ise are44�r Pawcauj,d include be minor retail
w s dx "lemerstas sta i d• that,
J. Rogers,,'& Co. realizes
that the leasing wall ct be total: retail and staff also
realities this. Mr Cle erats stated that a P C T7, must be
amended through with 'aeld change by the village Manager
and Vil.Iage Board MrsCl.ements stated that thetre limited
retail. should riothaI*a ma7of impact on traffic. Staffs
primary (:,oncern', was rN lardang parking. Mr. Clements stated
that ?.65 spaces are
'6' "red the ,corporate ,.uses
calculated at a rate 'f ;r 20% office and 30% warrehouse use.
Using a retail pastor-'Mfr10% the total parkin „needed would
be 211 spaces. The C"14r orate park; has 201 spaces and Mx
Clements stated hat "rs `aff feels comfortable with' that
1
z
:amoun t .
Chairman Basnik quest%awned zf ,there is a problem with
parking.
J
Mr. Clements stated h, t; staff feels the exrst'fhg number of
spaces is sufficient 4? 11mi es retail use wa11 not g,reatly
increase demand. He ei1 that the specific >m act could be
measured` during the �,ld chajnge� review process. Mr. Clements
stated that no addstai, 8;1 sighs should be allgFed.
The Board then,gener' Y discussed the petitioners request
and had no objection,
r
Chairman Basn.ik then; tertaahed a motion to grant t:he>
petitioners request an a e/h4ment to Special Use Ordnance
No. 4156 per SectionM .2201 to�. allow limited%retail use
subject to: 1.';A fie', fry the"illege Ager a�ad
concurrence by the V aage Bo rd, Reta isn shat,! he
limited' to no more t � j,0% crf,,the total loaf rea o an 1 &
use; 3. Limited rata's'` shall be approved s � ritin by the
Property owner and p ` fir y real tiager; 4. No ad itlannal ;si iaage
shall be allowed for ` tail u(ses.
Mr. Cassidy moved Mxr%IJP' Pratt 'seconded.. ;
UPON ROLL CALL:
AY Pratt, Saviano,,Gassidy,
A nik
MAYS ; one
l
Motion 'carriedby at"te of 5 0.
ZDA-48-Sr-81
July 25, 11991
Page 3 of 3
This case must still, be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
5_.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN "L
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA48-SU-91
APPLICANT: ROGERS CORPORATE PARK
ADDRESS: 1840-1894 ELMHURST ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
F----inF7;F-7
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1.1 Light Industrial
LOT SIZE: N/A
% COVERAGE: N/A
F.A-R— : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)
Ordinance #4156 to allow limited retail uses in the Rogers Corporate Park at the southwest
comer of Elmhurst Road and Algonquin Road.
Summgry of application: In March of 1990, the Rogers Company received approval of a
rezoning from B-3 to 1-1, and a P.U.D. to allow development of the Rogers Corporate
Park. Construction followed shortly thereafter, and at this time the project is completed,
and leasing has been very successful. During initial leasing, several prospective tenants
approached the Rogers Company and inquired about limited retail sales, from a warehouse
or showroom. The I-1 Light Industrial District prohibits retail sales, so these uses were not
allowed.
As an example, a piano retailer hoped to lease 10,000 sq. ft. in the industrial park as a
warehouse and distribution facility for several retail locations. This company had hoped to
be able to sell pianos from the warehouse on Saturdays and for special promotions. This
limited retailing was not allowed, so the company chose not to use the Corporate Park for
their warehouse and distribution operation.
Also, a prospective tenant is a distributor of kitchen cabinets. This company would like to
sell directly to the public from a showroom, and this retailing would be minor and secondary
to the distribution operation.
Seeing that limited retailing would be beneficial to users in the industrial park, the Arthur
Rogers Company requested this amendment to the P.U.D. The Company emphasizes that
any retailing would be accessory to permitted industrial uses, and that it is not their intent
to have a tenant do actual day-to-day retail sales at the park.
PrQpoEed PX.D. Amendment; The applicant suggests that retailing be limited to 15% of
the total floor area of a business, "dr to a certain number of hours or days. Staff believes
that it is important that the Village be able to review and evaluate retail uses, to measure
their impact on adjoining uses and parking.
From looking at other suburban zoning ordinances, many industrial districts allow limited
retail uses as a Special Use.
Inasmuch as Rogers Corporate Park already exists with a Planned Unit Development, and
considering the types of limited retailing being proposed, a Special Use permit does not
seem appropriate. However, some review of such uses is important.
Staff recommends that limited retailing be allowed in Rogers Corporate Park, subject to:
1. Field change approval by the Village Manager and concurrence by the Village Board.
2. Retailing shall be limited to no more than 10% of the total floor area of an 1-1 use.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
3. Limited retailing shall be approved in writing by the property owner and property
manager.
Lastly, staff notes that there are 201 parking spaces at the Rogers Corporate Park. The
parking requirement for the P.U.D. was calculated at a rate of 20% office space and 80%
warehouse/assembly space. This formula results in a parking requirement of 165 spaces.
Adding a 10% retail factor to the parking requirement would require 211 spaces. The
Planning staff believes that the 201 existing spaces are sufficient for the proposed limited
retailing.
Inspection Services notes that the frequency of retailing in a warehouse/office building
might place the buildings into a mercantile classification. This could require modification
to the existing buildings. The petitioner should be aware that Building Code requirements
could be a factor.
WMAMA13-Y-4
Staff recommends that P.U.D. Ordinance #4156 be amended to allow limited retailing, as
described above. Such approval should include a condition that no additional signs be
allowed for retail uses.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager WL,
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-49-Z-91, Cook County School Bus, Inc.
LOCATION: 1910 South Busse Road
DATE: July 30, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a rezoning application filed by Cook County School Bus, Inc. The applicant is requesting
that the property at 1910 South Busse Road be rezoned from R -X Single -Family Residential
District to R-4 Residential Development District.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of July 25, 1991. At
the meeting, Michael Collins, attorney for the applicant, presented testimony in support of
the request. Mr. Collins explained that the rezoning request was part of an overall
Settlement Agreement between Cook County School Bus, Inc. and the Village of Mount
Prospect. He noted that the property was involuntarily annexed to the Village and given
a R -X zoning designation which is not consistent with zoning of the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that disconnection litigation
is currently pending for several other properties forcibly annexed to the Village in 1987.
Cook County School Bus, Inc. entered into a Settlement Agreement with the Village to
avoid the pending litigation. The proposed rezoning to R4 is part of the agreement.
Mr. Clements explained that the R-4 zoning would be consistent with surrounding
properties, and the Comprehensive Land Use Plan. In addition, the property is not suited
to its current R -X zoning designation.
Arthur Holtzman, attorney representing the Village, further explained that the proposed R-
4 zoning is in the best long-term interest of the Village. The current use by the applicant
could continue as a legal non -conforming use.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. Some concerns and questions arose
regarding the continued non -conforming status of the existing school bus use under the
proposed R-4 zoning. It was noted that RA zoning is compatible with the surrounding
properties and the Comprehensive Plan. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the request to rezone 1910 South Busse Road from R-
X Single -Family Residential to R-4 Residential Development District.
JF:cl
ry[7'L F�L.AN
N ��c
1
PLA4osA 4 ` z'"
' [ •i
s.
cW�trT
aFfCRtP Tf�ON A'4
}*x� ,
i
F
2
FouNM)4TFP
b
F LO47;2- PLAN
rm1
__ aR 9 -
z
d
Li l
�11 ,
ry[7'L F�L.AN
N ��c
1
PLA4osA 4 ` z'"
' [ •i
c�RAvrrkac+xarau
cW�trT
aFfCRtP Tf�ON A'4
}*x� ,
i
BATE PLAN
2
FouNM)4TFP
b
F LO47;2- PLAN
d
Li l
I
MINT.:T1-7,S 017 THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CAST: NO4J-Z-91 Hearing Date: July- 25, 1991
P1:'11'I'r'1r0N1__'1;': Cook County School Bus, Inc.
SUBJECT PROPERT.'Y: 1910 South Busse Road
PUBLICATION DATE: July 9, 1991
Rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to
R-4 Residential Development
District.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Dennis Saviano
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting to rezone the subject property from
R -X Single Family Residence to R-4 Residential Development
District.
The petitioner, Michael Collins, attorney representing the
petitioner Cook County School Bus, stated that the subject
property was annexed into the Village and zoned R -X. Mr.
Collins stated that there is multi -family and commercial
properties surrounding the Cook County School Bus property.
Mr. Collins stated that R-4 zoning was suggested to be
consistent with the surrounding properties.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this is one of a number of properties that was involuntary
annexed into the Village in 1987. Mr. Clements stated that
the other properties are seeking disconnection in court and
these cases are still pending. Mr. Clements stated that Cook
Countv School Bus would like to construct a day-care center
for their employees and also a vehicle wash. They were
granted a permit for these projects by the County before the
annexation. The Village and Cook County School Bus have
entered a settlement Agreement as an alternative to the
pending litigation. The requested rezoning to R -A is part of
the Agreement. The proposed R-4 zoning will be consistent
with the surrounding land uses and the comprehensive plan.
7
l
f
i
ZBA;-Z- 4q'-91
July25, 1991.
Page 2 of 2
St .Cf zero°omrricoscis pprcr l of this request. V
Mr. Cassidy stated that' %the exist, ing school bus
,use
is r c]n-cc>rYf`crrm:r,n c nth Bard to the E- distrad:t'
i %
Mr. Clements stated thy.� this will be existing rtbn-conforming
,.ase noting that staff",nit want Industrial zori"i"ng of the
property or to ame nd t�� R-4 text to allow a bus" wash. As a
non -conforming use it ','w ll be phased out.
`ir. Clements then antrouced Mr. Arthur Holtzman, attorney
representing the i lla;g of Mount Prospect.
A4n" conformance
Mr. Cassidy asked why,/,/",,t,//"
e proposed rezoning is t
with the present use ,
Mr. Holtzman stated t the forst significant step to help
settle the dispute grant the:rezoning Mr, Holtzman
stated that many othe �roperties have filed sunt against the
Village of ?Mount Eros At. Mr ;Holtzman stated ',hat certain
i
rights have been granto Cobk County School `Zus in a
consent decree with Cdr County. Rezoning to R-4 would be a
greater benefit tothe �`illageand'the best in#rest of all
parties.
a
The Board then genera�ll discussed the petitioners request an
%j
had no objections
,l
Chairman Basnikthen�ertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request t, ezone from R -X Single 0;,"ily
Residence �t o lt_i, l esa tial Development D;istra ct:
Mr. Pratt moved.' Mr. Ssidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES °'noon, Pratt, 'Saviano, CAssidy,
%snik
NAYS ' ne
t
Motion carried by a v"' of 5 .
r
This case must still'�51111heard before the Villa""Board.
77,
j'ichelle Thompsont,
Recording Secretary
//
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNII-, CHAIRMAN MC
>
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
PATE: JULY 18, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-49-Z-91
APPLICANT: COOK COUNTY SCHOOL BUS, INC.
ADDRESS: 1910 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R -X (e3dsting); R4 (proposed)
LOT SIZE: 4.02 Acres
% COVERAGE: N/A
FA.R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
UM R M1 I
Page 2
This application was Filed requesting a rezoning of the subject property from an R -X Single
Family District to an R-4 Residential Development District.
Summary of application: Cook County School Bus has requested the rezoning to an R-4
District as part of an agreement designed to help settle pending litigation with the Village.
As background, Cook County School Bus was one of a number of properties along South
Busse Road that was annexed to the Village in 1987. Because the corporate limits of the
Village surrounded these properties, the Village passed appropriate ordinances involuntarily
annexing these properties to the Village. For a variety of reasons, these property owners
filed complaints in Cook County Circuit Court challenging the involuntary annexation and
seeking disconnection from the Village. This disconnection litigation is now pending in the
Appellate Court of Illinois.
At the same time, Cook County School Bus has long wanted to construct a day care facility
for their drivers and a vehicle wash for their vehicles. In fact, the Company has a Special
Use approval from Cook County to construct these facilities. Upon annexation to Mount
Prospect in 1987, the property was zoned R -X and the day care facility and vehicle wash
were not permitted with this zoning classification.
In an effort to avoid potentially lengthy and costly litigation, the applicant and Village
negotiated a Settlement Agreement that will remove Cook County School Bus from the
litigation pending in the Appellate Court, and assure it's annexation to the Village. This
Agreement will allow the Company to construct it's day care facility and vehicle wash as
originally approved, if Cook County School Bus requests a rezoning to the R-4 District, and
other items as found in the Settlement Agreement.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Concerning the rezoning, the R-4
classification would be consistent with multi-farhily zoning north and south of the site, on
the west side of Busse Road, The R-4 zoning would also be consistent with the multi-
family designation of the Comprehensive Plan. Thus, the rezoning is consistent with the
area. Also, the property is not suited for development with the Single Family R -X District.
With this information, the application meets the required standards of the Zoning
Ordinance.
OTHER VILIAGE STAFF COMMEM
All Village Departments reviewed the application, and there were no objections or concerns
raised about the R-4 zoning.
SUMNIARYIRECOMMENDATION
The staff would recommend approval of the rezoning as the R-4 classification is consistent
with the area, and meets the objectives of the Comprehensive Plan. According to the
Settlement Agreement, Cook County School Bus will be able to construct the vehicle wash
and day care facility, then operate as a legal non -conforming use in the R-4 District. In
addition to the benefit of the proper zoning classification for this property, Cook County
School Bus will withdraw from the disconnect litigation, and dismiss other litigation against
the Village.
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AVD/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PLtq/ " es
PROJECT: MT. +Re6ieff ANIMAL CLINIC
LOCATION: 888 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
DATE: 5Z22/1991
YES
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED -1-1771
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING'i;�l
APPROVAL fyf&1�1�
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL L�A)
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
vv_u_
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN FT. SIZE
SANITARY SEWER FT. N/A SIZE
STORM SEWER FT. N/A —SIZE
ROADWAYS --- N/A_
SIDEWALKS 50 SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS N/A
STREET LIGHTS # N/A
PARKWAY TREES YES # 8
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N/A
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED
NO
WATER KNIN 20 FT. 2" SERVICE SIZE
SANITARY SEWER 20 FT. 611 SIZE
STORM SEWER FT. N SIZE
ROADWAY N/A
PARKING LOTS 760 SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING N/A
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N/A
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS___DAY OF r 19 _? '.
Z
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk
FROM: Jeffrey A. Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
DATE: July 19, 1991
SUBJECT: Mt. Plaines Animal Clinic
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this in line kr inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
JAW/m
VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
LOCATION: ROUTE 83 AT OUTLO.TOF VENTURE STORE
DATE: 7/23/1991
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED
YBA
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED:
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED:
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING
APPROVAL
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL
v'
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN _FT. NIA SIZE
SANITARY SEWER FT. N/A SIZE
STORM SEWER FT. N/A_ SIZE
ROADWAYS N/A
SIDEWALKS SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS N/A
STREET LIGHTS # N/A
PARKWAY TREES # N/A_
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED
NO
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
WATER MAIN 88 FT. V SERVICE SIZE
SANITARY SEWER 145 FT. 6" SIZE
STORM SEWER 239 FT. 121 SIZE
ROADWAY _ NAA
PARKING LOTS COMPLETED SQ.YDS.
LANDSCAPING N/A
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19_.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois - 11 A
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
Village Clerk'""�
FROM: Jeffrey Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator AW
DATE: July 30, 1991
SUBJECT: Kentucky Fried Chicken
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project. The
contractor has satisfactorily performed the required work and I recommend approval of this
project. Please place this in line for inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
JW/M
pf') pir
31,1991
/caf
7/31/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19 ENTITLED "HEALTH REGULATIONS"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, is
a home rule unit of government, pursuant to the provisions of the
Constitution of the STate of Illinois of 1970, and as such home
rule unit is empowered to enact such legislation pertaining to its
local government affairs as is deemed necessary in the best
interest of the Village; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is interested in protecting
the environment through prevention of the disposal of infectious
medical wastes with the municipal waste stream; and
WHEREAS, the village of Mount Prospect is committed to the
protection of its citizens, and the general public, from infectious
medical wastes and medical instruments that pose a health risk when
improperly disposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Chapter 19 entitled "Health Regulations" of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further
amended by creating Article VII entitled "Medical Waste
Regulations"; so that hereinafter said Chapter 19 be include the
following:
to Article VII
MEDICAL WASTE REGULATIONS
SECTION:
19.701. Regulation of Infectious Medical Wastes
19.702. Definitions
19.703. Written Protocol
19.704. Storage Before Treatment
19.705. Storage Times
19.706. Packaging of Infectious Medical Waste
19.707. Final Disposal
19.708. Packaging and Disposal of Resident Generated Medical
Waste Sharps
19.709. Exemptions
19.710. Penalties
Section 19.701. Regulation of*InfectiouS Medical Wastes.
The handling of infectious medical wastes shall
be regulated in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
Section 19.702. Definitions. Infectious medical waste shall mean
waste that is capable of transmitting a
communicable disease.
COMMUNICABLE DISEASE:
An infectious agent or its toxic products which is transmitted
direp,tly or indirectly to a well, person from an infected
person, animal, or arthropod, or through the agency of an
intermediate host, vector, or the inanimate environment.
Chapter 19
Page 2 of 4
EFFECTIVE TREATMENT:
Treatment that reduces pathogenic qualities of the waste to
a point where it is safe to handle by non -classified
personnel. To be effective, the treatment must be designed
for the waste in question and be carried out in a manner
acceptable to the authorized enforcing agent for the Village.
the treatment may include, but is not limited to, the
following:
1. Incineration
2. Steam sterilization (autoclaving)
3. Chemical disinfection
4. Thermal inactivation
5. Irradiation
HEALTH OFFICER:
For the purpose of this Article, the Health Officer shall mean
the Environmental Health Coordinator of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
INFECTIOUS MEDICAL WASTE:
Infectious medical waste shall include, but is not limited to,
the following:
1. Pathological wastes (human tissues, blood, excreta, and
secretions)
2. Cultures
3. Used sharps
4. Infectious agent stock and associated biologicals
5. Human blood and blood products
6. Human body parts and contaminated disposable bedding,
bandages and dressings
7. Contaminated laboratory wastes
8. Wastes from surgery and autopsy
9. Contaminated animal carcasses, body parts, and bedding
Examples of establishments generating infectious medical waste
include, but are not limited to the following:
11. Hospitals
2. Doctor's and dentist's offices
3. Medical and diagnostic laboratories
4. Blood banks And plasma centers
5. Ambulatory surgical facilities
6. Long-term health care facilities
7. Research or analytical laboratories
8. Pharmaceutical facilities
9. Veterinary offices and hospitals
10. clinics
11. Mortuaries
12. Animal quarantine facilities
LIQUID INFECTIOUS MEDICAL WASTE:
Liquid waste that is included with solid infectious medical
waste for treatment and disposal. It does not include urine,
wash water, and other liquids most properly, disposed of via
the sanitary sewer,
SECURED AREA:
An area which is accessible only to classified personnel. If
indoors, the area 'must not be accessible to the general
Chapter 19
Page 3 of
public. If outdoors, the area must be locked. Secure areas
must be marked with the universal biohazard symbol at least
six inches (611) in height.
Hypodermic and suture needles, syringes, scalpel blades,
pipettes, lancets, guidewires, or other objects that could cut
or penetrate the skin but not limited to the above.
Section 19.703. Written Protocol. A written protocol for
infectious medical waste treatment and disposal,
and receipts documenting the property removal or disposal of
infectious medical wastes, must be maintained on the premises and
available for inspection by the authorized enforcing agent for the
Village. The protocol must include storage before treatment,
methods of treatment, quality assurance checks per specifications
of the manufacturer of the equipment used to treat the infectious
medical waste, and final disposal methods. Receipts documenting
the property removal and/pr disposal of infectious medical wastes
must be maintained for the most recent twelve (12) month period.
Receipts shall be from a licensed medical waste hauler, or sanitary
landfill, incinerator, or other facility approved for the disposal
of infectious medical waste.
Section 19.704. Storage Before Treatment. Infectious medical
waste being stored prior to treatment, or prior
to the collection for subsequent treatment, shall be kept in a
secure area. Used sharps shall be placed in puncture -resistant
containers. Liquid infectious waste shall be stored in leak -proof
containers. Each infectious waste container in the storage area
shall be individually marked with the universal biohazard symbol.
Section 19.705. Storage Times. Storage times for infectious
medical waste that can putrefy and generate
noxious odors shall be no longer than seven (7) days above 15
degrees fahrenheit or thirty (30) days below 15 degrees fahrenheit.
Storage times for other infectious medical wastes shall be kept as
short as possible, but not to exceed thirty (30) days.
Section 19.706. Packaging of infectious Medical Waste. Packaging
of Infectious Medical Waste shall be in the
following manner:
1- If liquid, in a leak -proof container before being bagged,
boxed, or drummed.
2. If sharps, in a puncture -resistant container which is
non-openable except by use of tools, before being bagged,
box or drummed.
3. All waste placed in sealed, tear -resistant plastic bags
identified by the universal biohazard symbol. The bags
shall be thick enough to contain any spilled liquid
infectious waste.
4. All waste -in a second properly identified bag, box, or
drum, if the treatment process destroyed the biohazard
marking or reduced the structural integrity of the
original bag.
Section 19.707. Final Disposal. Final disposal of infectious
medical waste must be in a United States Environmental
Protection. Agency approved sanitary landfill or incinerator
approved for infectious or medical hazardous wastes.
Chapter 19
Page 4 of
Section 19.708. Packaging and Disposal of Resident Generated
Medical Waste Sharps.
Medical waste sharps generated by private residents shall be
packaged in a puncture proof container prior to disposal. Disposal
shall be in a method that is approved by the Health Officer of the
Village.
Section 19.709. Exemptions, Exerptions from the requirements of
this Article may be granted in writing by the
Health officer if sufficient evidence indicates that such
exemptions would not cause a risk to public health.
Section 19.710. Penalties. Any person, firm or corporation found
guilty of violating any provisions of the Article
shall be fined no less than twenty five dollars ($25.00) no more
than five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each offense. A separate
offense shall be deemed to have been committed for each day or each
violation occurs on continues. 11
=nQE--TWO: That all ordinances or parts of Ordinances in
conflict with this Ordinance be and the same are hereby repealed.
SEcTiON THREE: That this Ordinance
effect from and after its passage,
pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED thi's - day of
shall be in full force and
approval and publication in
a L. Farley
ge President
1991.
BH/CAF
8/2/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Article I entitled "Purpose and Definitions" of
Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by adding in proper alphabetical sequence
the following definitions:
of DISTRIBUTOR: Any person, firm or corporation responsible for
placing and maintaining a newspaper vending
machine in a public right-of-way.
NEWSPAPER
Any self-service or coin-operated box,
VENDING
container, storage unit or other dispenser
MACHINE:
installed, used, or maintained for the display
and sale of newspapers or other news
periodicals.
PARKWAY:
That part of the public street right-of-way
occupied by the street pavement and located
between the back of the curb and the sidewalk,
or the right-of-way line if no sidewalk exists,
as well as the raised dividing strip of a
roadway. Parkway shall also include any area
within a roadway which is not open to vehicular
travel.
ROADWAY:
That portion of a street improved, designed,
or ordinarily used for vehicular travel.
SIDEWALK:
Any surface provided primarily for the use of
pedestrians.
STREET:
All that area dedicated to public use for
public street purposes and shall include, but
not be limited to, roadways, parkways, alleys
and sidewalks. 11
SECTION TWO: That Chapter 11 entitled "Merchants, Businesses,
Occupations and Amusements" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by establishing Article
XXXVIII entitled "Newspaper Vending Machines"; so that hereinafter
Article XXXVIII of Chapter 11 shall be and read as follows:
11 ARTICLE XXXVIII
NEWSPAPER VENDING MACHINES
SECTION:
11.3801. License Required
11.3802. Application for License
11.3803. Fees
11.3804. Standards for maintenance and Installation
11.3805. Location and Placement of Newspaper Vending Machines
11.3806. Violations
11.3807. Placement of Newspaper Vending Machines on Public
Building Premises
11.3808. Enforcement officer
11.3809. Abandonment
11.3810. Penalties
11.3811. Severability
Newspaper Vending Machines
Page 2 of 5
See. 11.3801. License Required. It shall be unlawful for any
person, firm or corporation to erect, place, maintain
or operate, on any public street or sidewalk, or in any other
public way or place, in the Village of Mount Prospect, any
newspaper vending machine without first having obtained a permit
from the Village of mount Prospect, which permit shall specify the
exact location of such machine or machines. one permit may be
issued to include any number of newspaper vending machines and
shall be signed by the applicant.
See. 11.3802. Application for License. Application for a
newspaper vending machine permit shall be made to
the Village Clerk on forms provided by the Village Clerk. The
application for permit shall contain the following:
A. The name and address of the person, firm or corporation to be
in immediate charge of each newspaper vending machine.
B. The location or locations at which it is proposed to locate
each newspaper vending machine.
C. The applicant shall provide a signed statement that the
permittee agrees to indemnify and save harmless the Village
of Mount Prospect, its officers, directors and employees and
agents against any loss or liability for damage, including
expenses and costs, for bodily or personal injury and for
property damage sustained by any person as a result of the
installation, use or maintenance of a newspaper vending
machine(s) within the Village.
D. A Certificate of Insurance, issued by an insurance company
authorized to do business in the State of Illinois, providing
coverage to the Village of Mount Prospect, its officers,
directors, employees and agents in an amount of one million
dollars ($1,000,000-00) for any property damage or personal
injury that may be caused by the newspaper vending machine(s)
being located within the designated location. Said
Certificate of Insurance shall be maintained in full force
throughout the life of the permit. If at any time the policy
shall not be in full force, the permit shall become null and
void.
A permit may be issued for the installation of newspaper vending
machines without prior inspection of the location of the newspaper
vending machine and the''Installation, use or maintenance shall be
conditioned solely upon observance of the provisions of this
Article.
See. 11.3805. Fees. It shall be the responsibility of each vendor
or distribution that erects, places or maintains or
operates on any public street or sidewalk, or in any other public
way or place, one or more newspaper vending machines in the Village
of Mount Prospect to pay an annual permit fee as set forth in
Article XXXIV of this Chapter.
Sec. 11.3806. Standards for Maintenance and Installation Any
4 -
rests upon, in or over
with the following sti
A. No writing or ad
vending machine
newspaper, instri
a malfunction of
vending machine which in whole or in par
, public sidewalk or parkway, shall comply
,rds:
ising may be displayed on any newspaper
ier than the name and price of the
)ns for its use, and information to report
machine.
Newspaper Vending Machines
Page 3 of 5
B. Each newspaper vending machine shall have affixed to it a
notice setting forth the name and address of the distributor
and a working telephone number to call during normal business
hours to report a malfunction of the coin -return mechanism.
Such notice shall not exceed one square foot in size and shall
be located so as to be seen by anyone using the newspaper
vending machine.
C. The newspaper vending machine may only be located on a solid
surface such as concrete or asphalt and the solid surface must
extend at least three feet (31) in front of the machine.
D. Each newspaper vending machine shall be maintained in a neat
and clean condition and in good repair at all times.
Sec. 11.3806. Location and Placement of Newspaper Vending
Machines.
Any newspaper vending machine which rests in whole or in part upon,
or on any portion of a public right-of-way or which projects onto,
into or over any part of a public right-of-way, shall be located
in accordance with the following provisions:
A. No newspaper vending machine shall be used or maintained which
projects onto, into or over any part of the roadway of any
public street, or which rests, wholly or in part upon, along
or over any portion of the roadway of any public street.
B. No newspaper vending machine shall be permitted to rest upon,
in or over any public sidewalk or parkway under the following
conditions:
When such site or location is used for ground level or
underground public utility purposes or public
transportation purposes;
2,. When such newspaper vending machine unreasonably
interferes with or impedes the flow of pedestrian or
vehicular traffic including any legally parked or stopped
vehicle, the ingress into or egress from any residence
or place of business, or the use of poles, posts, traffic
signs or signals, hydrants, mailboxes or other public use
objects permitted at or near the location.
C. No newspaper vending machine shall be bolted or otherwise
attached to any fixture located in the public right-of-way,
except to other newspaper vending machines. Chains shall not
be permitted as a method of attaching newspaper vending
machines together.
D. No newspaper vending machine shall be placed, installed, used
or maintained within three feet (31) of any of the following:
1. Any marked crosswalk;
2. Any fire hydrant, fire call box, police call box or other
emergency facility;
3. Any driveway;
4. Any government area other than a parkway improved with
lawn, flowers, shrubs, trees or other landscaping.
Newspaper Vending machines
Page 4 of 5
E. No newspaper vending machine shall be located at the
intersection of or :along the parkway of any street than does
not permit parking."
Sec. 11.3807. violations.
A. Upon the determination of the Village Manager, or his
designated agent, that a newspaper vending machine has been
installed, used or maintained in violation of the provisions
of this Article, an order to correct the offending condition
shall be issued to, the permittee or the distributor of the
newspaper vending machine. Such order may be telephone or
telefaxed to the distributor and confirmed by mailing a copy
of the order by regular mail. The order shall specifically
describe the offending condition. Failure to correct the
offending condition within three (3) days (excluding
Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays) after the mailing date
of the order shall result in the offending newspaper vending
machine being summarily removed and process as unclaimed
property by the Village.
B. Any newspaper vending machine, the owner or distributor of
which is not properly licensed un the provisions of this
Article shall be, immediately removed and processed as
unclaimed property.
C. If a newspaper vending machine is in such a condition as to
create a danger to public safety, the Village Manager or his
designated agent, shall have the authority to immediately
remove or cause the removal of such newspaper vending machine.
D. The cost of the removal, including the use of personnel and/or
equipment, shall be charged to and recovered from the
distributor or from the person for whom the machine has been
or is being installed.
See. 11.3808. Placement of Newspaper Vending Machines on Public
Building Premises.
Newspaper vending machines licenses may be denied for placement on
the premises, inside or outside, of an building owned or leased by
the local, County State or Federal government when, in the judgment
of the appropriate governmental authority, the machine or machines
will interfere with any of the following:
A. The public safety
B. The ability of theuser to carry out primary activities of the
building;
C. The aesthetic or design continuity or scheme of the building
or its premises.
Sec. 11.3809. Enforcement officer. The Village Manager or his
designated agent shall be deemed the Enforcement
officer for the purposes of this Article.
Sec. 11.3810. Abandonment. In the event a newspaper vending
machine remains empty for a period of fourteen (14)
continuous days, the same shall be deemed abandoned and in
violation of this Article and may be treated in the manner as
provided in section 11.'3808** of this Article.
Newspaper Vending Machines
Page 5 of 5
Sec. 11.3811. Penalty. In addition to any other remedies
available to the Village of Mount Prospect, any
person, firm or corporation found guilty of violating any provision
of this Article shall be subject to a fine of not less than one
Hundred Dollars ($100.00) nor more than one Thousand Dollars
($1,000.00). Each day the violation continues shall constitute a
separate offense.
See. 11.3812. Severability. If any Section, subsection, sentence,
clause or phrase of this Article is for any reason
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by the decision of any court
of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not effect the
validity of the remaining portions of this Article.
SECTION THREE: That Section 11.3410 entitled "Other Fees" of
Chapter 11 of the Village Code of the Mount Prospect, as amended,
is hereby further amended by adding thereto under paragraph 0 the
language "Newspaper Vending Machine, $25.00 per machine annually";
so that hereinafter said Section 11.3410.0.4 shall be read as
follows:
11 4. Newspaper Vending machines $25.00 per machine annually"
SECTION FOUR: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
day of ..
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
1991.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO
DATE: July 24, 1991
SUBJECT: FIRE DEPAR7MENT CLOTHING & GYM CLOTHING
The Fire Department proposes the purchase of the 1991 uniform
allotment. The total allotment was divided into two areas; gym
clothing and station wear, and each was bid separately. Sealed
bids were opened on July 8, 1991. The results are as follows:
REUSS
$225.98
R&R
$179.65
KREST
$165.00
ARTISTIC
$105.97
KALE $779.65
KREST $732.89
R&R $617.05
I recommend that Artistic Sporting be awarded the bid for gym
clothing because they are low bid in this area and will provide us
with quality athletic wear.
In the area of station wear, I recommend R&R Uniforms who did
offer the lowest bid on the entire uniform package. All suppliers
bid each individual item in the overall uniform package. since
R&R Uniforms are new to our bid process, the Clothing Committee
spent extra time investigating the company's ability to deliver
merchandise and they verified that the quality meets our
specifications.
Sufficient funds for these proposed purchases are in the FY91/92
Budget on Page 85, Account Code #1-042-01-7110.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON FIXON
FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO
DATE: July 29, 1991
SUBJECT: SELF CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS
Sealed bids were opened on July 8, 1991, at 10:00 A.M. for the
proposed purchase of five (5) MSA Self Contained Breathing
Apparatus with spare tanks and brackets. The bid results are as
follows:
BIDDE BIDPRICE
AIR ONE $13,471.00
INTERSTATE OF MILWAUKEE $15,728.00
These SCBA's will continue to upgrade current stock.
Funds are available in the 91/92 Budget on Page 86, under Account
Code 1-041-02-8011. 1 recommend the purchase from the low bidder,
Air one.
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
EMC/mah
.VI
I
Mount Prospect Public Works Department F INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: July 10, 1991
SUBJ: Sealed Bid Results for 2 Ground
Speed Central Hydraulic Systems
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 a.m. on July 10,1991, for
two(2) ground speed central hydraulic systems. Seven(7) invita-
tional bids were forwarded in addition to advertising as re-
quired, and three(3) bids were received. Bid results as follows:
Bidder Bid Price Delivery
Heil -Chicago $18,071.20 30 days
Hoyle Road Equipment $18,914.00 30 days
Bourbonnais Supply $18,959.00 40 days
There is $39,276 remaining in the 1991-1992 budget for the pur-
chase of two(2) dump trucks and related equipment under Account
Code 48-077-93-8357 and 48-077-93-8358. The hydraulic systems
which were bid are for the two new dump trucks.
I recommend awarding the contract to the low bidder, Heil -Chica-
go, Inc. for two(2) ground speed central hydraulic systems, at a
delivered price of $18,071.20. Delivery is anticipated in 30
days.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager WV_1
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: August 1, 1991
SUBJECT: Request to Waive Competitive Bidding - Underground Electric Service
A final phase of the parking lot reconstruction project at the northeast comer of Main and
Busse will be to relocate the overhead utilities underground, and removal of the wood poles.
Arrangements have been made with Commonwealth Edison on this matter. However, the
Village is obligated to provide service connections from the new ground -mounted
transformer to the Senior Center and the Prospect Medical Clinic.
In the interest of completing this work as soon as possible, staff obtained three competitive
quotes from electrical contractors, and are requesting that the Village Board waive the bid
process on this matter. Written quotes on the project are as follows:
1. Gibson Electric $7,370
2. Pinner Electric $12,000
3. Wood Electric , $13,416
In reviewing the quotes, staff talked with Gibson Electric to confirm the scope of the work.
After discussions, and a detailed site visit, Gibson reconfirmed their cost estimate.
Staff would recommend that the Village
flage Board waive competitive bidding and award a
contract to Gibson Electric, based on their lowest written quote.
DMC:cl
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager WC
-
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: August 1, 1991
SUBJECT: Dogwood Lane Reconstruction - Request for Contract Increase
On June 4, 1991, the Village Board approved a contract with Johnson Paving for
reconstruction of Dogwood Lane. The contract amount was $44,913.50.
During construction, the Engineering Division observed that it would be better to install
concrete driveway aprons rather than asphalt aprons as specified in the contract. The
reason for this recommendation was that garbage trucks maneuver and back-up across the
aprons for access to dumpsters, and the driveways serve as access to a large number of units
and carry considerable traffic. Concrete aprons would have better longevity than asphalt,
and there would be fewer maintenance problems.
Accordingly, staff would recommend that the Village Board approve a contract increase to
Johnson Paving in the amount of $4,704 for concrete aprons. The total revised contract
amount would be $49,617.50, subject to measuring quantities of sod this fall. The project
budget was estimated at $60,000.
DMC:cI
('T
I --
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS 0
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO
DATE: July 24, 1991
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF BID PROCESS FOR LIFE PAC 10
The Fire Department respectfully requests a waiver from the bid
process as it relates to the purchase of a Life Pac 10. This
request is being made because Physio Control of Redmond,
Washington is the only source through which an LP10 is available.
Funds for the Life Pac 10 are provided in this FY Budget in
Account No. 1-042-02-8012. The total cost of this item is
$8,625.00.
With this request is supporting information on the use of the
LP10. Life Pac's by Physio Control is the standard unit approved
for use by Northwest Community Hospital EMS System. The LP10 is
the third generation of Life Pac's that have been used by the
Mount Prospect Fire Department.
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
Att.
SENT BY:PHYSIO-CONTROL 1-18-91 ; 7:37AM ; CUSTOMER SE,—,LE4 7088705660;# 2
Physlot0r)trol Corporation
CU010MOT Support Center
11871 Willows Road Northeast
Post Office Box 97023
Redmond, WA 98073-9723 USA
Telephone i 800.442,1142
Fax: 200.867,4148
June 17, 1991
Chief Steve Dumovich
Mt. Prospect Fire Dept.
Fax: (708) 870-5660
Dear Chief Dumovich,
It was nice talkinwith you the other day. Thank you for your interest in the
new LIMPAK tevology. Enclosed Is the pricing you requested.
In addition, let me know what you would like to do regarding the old
LIFEPAK0 'unit (please notice it has not been included In the proposal).
I will call soon to follow up with you,
Sincerely,
Joe King
Account Consultant
PHYSIO -CONTROL CORPORATION
JK:KH
Enclosure(s)
SENT BY:PHYSIO-CONTROL -16-91 7:38AM CUSTOMER & 'CE-
7OB8705560;# 3
Caroorav on
customer buaaort center
r e i I w+Howe Road Narthaast
QNlOtatl011#:
11014A
Cdnys+o-COntroi
"Olt0WCe Boll 97023 - '...
Aedmona, WA 98077-9723 USA
rt 142
Page #:
1
IechOne 800/442-1
FAX 206/867.4146
Quote Date:
6/17J91
To: Chief Steve Dumovich Sales Representative:
Joe Ding
Mt. Prospect Fire Dept.
(800) 442-1142 ext. 2668
Fax: (708) 870-5660
FOB:
Redmond, WA
Shipping:
90 days
Terms:
Net 30 days from date of
invoice
This quote is firm until; 8/17/91
unit
EKU amiaticm
WX
Eris Tft
LWEPAK010 DEPIBRILLATOP MONUOR WITH QUI -PACES
NON-INVASIVE PACEMAKER dFrION.
I. 804200- Portable DC'deHbrillator/cardioscope features the QUIK-PACED
2 m°`
170,0,00
ztoninvaalve pacemaker, battery operation, full WitiotAtIAS krip dart
recorder sand statue dispiayo 9 es Intclude: three Battery Paler, external
QUI -LOOK4 defibrillation as, eluate1.11% og&ZWO
jX, alect three rolls ECC ralorder paper, este BOG rulergam=
is 1 i 0 64's -lead padent;r ± operstting= cdons and one sanrvlos
manual, One year Warranty on pew and labor.
TOTAL THIS QUOTE
$17,250.00
0'TV At
0 4
s�
R ,
,
r
ISapvN
Olt aa�-�sy ° � ► S
R
n10 Approximate cost of a 24 -month lease is $880/month.
Approxitnate cost of a 36 -month lease is $600/month.
xu
Soecar+cattens ria orues s„c;e:; to
p '. "; I. _..Sna�Ge w11R,eut holies ADOnCeb e
SENT BY:PHYSIO—CONTROL -18-91 ; 7:39AM CUSTOMER SE CE-* 7088705650;# 4
Ternm of Sall
"com or Gverao Or We
moopsm" of Pj4homwo odor * imp"VOy mode owtdkwvw or dew* or M forrtM reel conciftwo mo faft hero# and on 0"ach"mrK0 hwOo and It" 00 wwwOwto 10"
co"wWwwo "RO*W*and god V~ a ww%bo or hfth*wl acceptor Od
all mdowwoom, urva OHw tow be "rom" In vw*v mm 0 =0 +0 brorwdre of hfMw"we&==O "00m
W" W4 #I CMISO WM It* horro ordomidthorm0*4 ockricWAINOGINT100. a aroo0j" fame and caw~$ WO ow fow moo" 04 Me
rams MR QModOws 40 ft *a&~ two golown I ArMINW, 1wdw ocrowmouie, Abommwero ado ftt #0�vro of *w ow marov. OR Aoc#+ wbwowor4 ado" 00 do
V*oWrtft by *H, to" hw#pt, TrHp totro Mb oorod4cre maw MOO o#VWOd. a PVIMWW# cedar#WFF#V*0d hWv MKFWW ~ by a V~ OW44"WO AJOOOQ.*" Woo by
a vmowtood 4wrogor awyft4omtra 00W rwow*ovw of JOTWOW04 art W *Ah~ to vay VA Oav1%wm hw*m 00 fw#w
I Ph.- A gjx=M
ftcol on atowlitted by rov.9000 PuAd*d Pft* lot a by W~ mmioctim ftm Rwootarrimil.
r'v Pvct— do" mot ota" My vo� woo w "Woo P My ft*iN% 40,%V, Or opro-ko. dromOVOL doom waff~, OMvkAw prowomfov 060VICK ow ON~ 4#Airy
tewe6orm $w* Ah"vo4o"0 cra is 0dudw N*n-m WOW, * POPOWPONY 10 41106040*04, M4 VOW "WOW40*10 omodor* V*41219 and owflocwrwo, AaMomor ow*"
not to IWA& wwwor or decorroo WO)
z
;V9hQw 000" WIDE be WA 0400 of kiwrwlt volow *Advod by R1r00<4e" Ift *010010 14140 04 Md OW %M Of PMONICA to "WMWOM 9 " 110 PJWvAmor 4W dW"N Of
�etlw by a+ymMwCaroMd 0a a 0*%* of " pol" of W*Wlw". twom Magma fwOVW d*WY 00 ow f4mpMAb0v of tho hichomw W*o ww#WzAr Waved by "ar
E. pcwmant
u0w cwwa 00 croa, ter" of pawftent CFO I W% or hvdco 6A W date aft tnwame does.
Id-
Lroeci MOW Qccak,0Matra pqpWgvpdfa k*9"bEdr4CW0&rwn, mole wM wwAE boby lot DW w rrooccople ka"or dCrOW.
ktil wpm!** raver M4 rwwy Ryfooca" of waw doodemy. pow"Imm 0 rvol cwarwwt wom "vr*daI*
in 0* dpw4# ot AAh home, w#064"d %is domm proftan or immiko poeopted by PwMemor
W."."tv
17"#w1fitodwarm *w 900do QM0" 41010wom and a# made A fou ofall o0w %am"m, oftftv or oft w w *WAN of WOW and k, 4%, ov
;j wpe, ob090#4m a obb,"m M W pdrr. pvyE*.Cpmod drew wM# rreaow, and r4 r4promemPeOve of AHAW4w*c( ofhw +am a c4morcrie Ofter 0 *Avi*so to ma*, dry worwN
W,gpoppj,,#M. OW#4 or kra"d. wopcRy a Im wAyo. 9*W Mann om W ftg*f 0 *4 Mrft4 *4WXv%ft XV100401001 0`100 her to k1mes to My dormap sAft1mod by Kdohmw
msrq Rom over/ 11 ft* ropimpormorrt a topm at Om*rrW" Qmw ft ap" wwav"
"304ONTROL WAAU NOT BE UQU MR DiROCT, INCOeNTAL C0kVQWWW4 ON OTHER OAAAA94, M 0111WIFOGS SET KWW HEREIN ARE =LUSIVS,
o"m w4oy to " PuroNam mm co,.wamv ck*m mmi be moom by to Ptirdum and not by c6m v!
pomr of ropar " be Wis r&Xwwft6'tV of Mn kM&AEM
7
1;affy *
,a At"O'Clyled vimwt at ofoaxto of **Axrdw "V Irom QW"VFAWOIOW at ow Tork*s"Wft WWI am ~*~, opt. Mahar of "Woorw1m, Iftom, flow, Ara,
ow%pM*. YoddrVe wpkn 0 A41' Of 40d, *W"W Of ?1`001210 a WWW at are glhw cu&m OIA of igidgerxIber dMircl ot PhImm.4a0va sholl nor be 4OPT44 o br000t, of
cw*=0 *(sor$, aNd *V(fW* 000 00 be OW1011401 AN V* W40 Of &4h 400
IL PV!& -A ninnoffirraft
atn"W'woany oc bg"004arw too, doom 16"Owkwolumihard
ONION daw&*ftmdLA BEI,, pow in *0 0,~ "ohms.
0,-LIObfE,bf
.a," rar net be #W* to and ROW~ 001 hop hW%W ROM My AOROMIN, their Of #011 PM4W a" OW" 0 OWWO AOMORI($ ap"WON
Or $0100 001,01904-'alfto OWIMIOrft "coo*** ~AxotEmilift
Sloe and Inca worn taw" pro cipploMe to at IpsChmpa EWIVW from p*#1 0,1 Nom sjo toeo W4 to p In *"Q to FPVi&CMtF*1 by Mfr k#ChOW,
li
an ompollmm A f4f*we bow'"Of wedowsor beew" porow.0 a
"20'em. a won a Domm 04irg 111000mcciii of carwperorW s,rbdmaan aaPaiawa iM SWM or a mmmover a ?w or ^W#W* 40
19awaod wlw *0 PFOA"M Go My opoembid balm4fty of MOW" do,
!a
,, Q0d%w as hew o" wwortwdesmmerved horom, PtMWo4aMrW #,dE NN, 00 Vo, and ra"odWs owo~ or Ia. Md #%W md be maLmod to proceed %^ PWWranCo 01 the
M m=' Wag horotorm v Naxper is in sato to ANY404wou uxw ft at My Open, awMtaa
11, &*iwww I— M13 r.
P,,now m pqV co tpor or" qWa%s","j" to onforcerrmir" a otowwwaW of fW^ Wrdw VA Agoe"wer" MLA" rowaowmee atranwyt to*$.
14, C.nnn L.xwr
d
z Mount Prospect Public Works Department
7W cm USA
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager c: Dave Jepson
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: July 30, 1991
SUBJECT: NWMC Auction of Surplus Property
The Northwest Municipal Conference is scheduling a public auc-
tion for municipally -owned equipment on Saturday, October 19,
1991. Per our conversation, I have volunteered the use of our
Public Works facility for that event, which will exempt us from
the loo auctioneer's fee.
The following equipment is recommended to be offered for sale:
Village Min. Selling
I.D. No. Year Description Price
504
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
$650
507
1983
Chevrolet
Malibu
700
508
1983
Chevrolet
Malibu
600
P-3
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-4
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-5
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-6
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-9
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-11
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-12
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-15
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
P-20
1985
Chevrolet
Celebrity
500
P-21
1985
Chevrolet
Celebrity
500
I-22
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
500
I-24
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
500
I-28
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
500
I-29
1987
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
2722
1984
Chevrolet
C-20 Pickup Truck
500
The cars and truck are units which have been replaced.
An ordinance designating this equipment as surplus and allowing
it to be offered for sale to the highest bidders C public
auction will have to be passed prior to the auction. The ordi-
nance as drafted will allow the Village Manage to sell the
surplus equipment at either a Mount Prospect ff Schaumburg auc-
tion. I recommend passage of this ordinance. If there are less
than 60 vehicles scheduled for the auction, that sale will be
canceled, and the Conference will sponsor only the auction in
Mount Prospect on october 19, 19,91.
"ReTert-L.- Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
AUCTN'91.MEM/FILES/PW
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION OF
PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corpo-
rate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no longer
necessary or useful to or for the best interests of said jurisdiction
to retain ownership of the personal property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and the board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to sell said personal proper-
ty at public auction.
now, therefore, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUST-
EES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT:
SECTION ONE: Pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois
Municipal code, Illinois Revised Statutes, C24, Section 11-76-4, the
Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect find that
the following described personal property:
Serial No.
Village
I.D. No.
Year
Make
Model
Minimum
Value
1G1BL6968FY179109
504
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
$ 650
1GIAW69HODR217864
507
1983
Chevrolet
Malibu
700
1G1AW69H4DR236739
508
1983
Chevrolet
Malibu
600
lGlBL5176KA144652
P-3
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
lGlBL5178KA144555
P-4
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
lGlBL5177KA144630
P-5
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
1G1BL5170KA144596
P-6
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
lGlBL5178KA144569
P-9
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
lGlBL5177KA144711
P-11
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
lGlBL5170K.A144808
P-12
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
lGlBL5179KA144869
P-15
1989
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
1G1AW27R6F6201998
P-20
1985
Chevrolet
Celebrity
500
1G1AW27R9F6201560
P-21
1985
Chevrolet
Celebrity
500
1G1BL69Z3FH135089
I-22
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
500
1G1BL69Z1FH134734
I-24
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
500
lGlBL69ZOFH135969
I-28
1985
Chevrolet
Impala
500
lGlBL5160HX218550
I-29
1987
Chevrolet
Caprice
500
1GCGC24MOFJ123752
2722
1984
Chevrolet
C-20 Pickup
500
now owned by said jurisdiction, is no longer necessary or useful to
the jurisdiction, and the best interests of the jurisdiction would be
best served by its sale.
SECTION TWO; Pursuant to said Section 11-76-4, the Village
Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sell the aforementioned
personal property now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect at public
auction to the highest bidder. Said property shall be sold at either
of the following scheduled auctions:
11:00 AM - Saturday, September 7, 1991
Schaumburg Public Works Facility
714 South Plum Grove Road
Schaumburg, Illinois
or
11:00 AM - Saturday, October 19, 1991
Mount Prospect Public works Facility
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois
The Village Manager is authorized to determine at which auction said
property shall be sold.
SECTION THREE: The Village Manager is hereby authorized and
may direct the Northwest Municipal Conference to advertise the sale of
the aforementioned personal property in a newspaper published within
the community before the date of said public auction.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Manager is hereby authorized and
may direct the Northwest Municipal Conference to enter into an agree-
ment for the sale of said personal property. The Auction shall be
conducted in the manner set forth in the specifications for the sale
of vehicles attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: No bid which is less than the minimum value set
forth in list of property to be sold shall be accepted, unless a lower
amount is authorized by the Village Manager or his representative at
the auction.
SECTION SIX: Upon payment of the full auction price, the
Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to convey and trans-
fer title to the aforesaid personal property, to the successful bidder.
SECTION SEVEN: This ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, by a vote of at least three-fourths
of the corporate authorities and approval in the manner provided by
law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED AND APPROVED this _ day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
A U C T I O N I N V E N T O R Y F O R
Name: Public Works Department
Jurisdiction: Mount Prospect
Phone: 7081870-5640
We would like to participate in (check best answer)
September (Schaumburg Auction)
x October (Mount prospect Auction)
If our auction of first choice is filled, we (check best answer)
would like to be included in the other auction.
x would not like to be included in the other auction.
SERIAL NUMBER
TYPE OF VEHICLE
YEAR
MAKE
MODEL
MILEAGE
# OF I
TRANS.
# OF
AIR
MINIMUM
OTHER COMMENTS
ear truck a ui
DOORS
auto/man
CLYND.
COND.
PRICE
�®
1G1BL6968FY174104
Sedan
'85
Chevrolet
Impala
107,000
4
Auto
6
Yes
$ 650
IGIAW69HODR217864
„
'83
Malibu
60,000
4
"
8
700
1G1AW69H4DR236739
'83
Malibu
104,000
4
"
8
"
600
IGIBL5176KA144652
'89
Caprice
60,500
4
8
500
1G1BL5178KA144555
'89
"
Caprice
56,400
4
"
8
"
500
IGIBL5177KA144630
"
'89
"
Caprice
60,200
4
"
8
"
500
IGIBL5170KA144596
189
Caprice
70,200
4
`
8
„
500
lGlBL5178KA144569
189
Caprice
61,200
4
8
500
IGIBL5177KA144711
'89
Caprice
75,000
4
8
500
IGIBL5170KA144808
189
Caprice
71,900
4
"
8
500
lGlBL5179KA144869
'89
Caprice
60,000
4
8
"
500
1G1AW27R6F6201998
'85
Celebrity
48,000
2
4
500
1G1AW27R9F6201560
'85
Celebrity
35,000
2
"
4
"
500
1G1BL69Z3FH135089
'85
'"
jImpala=50,400
4
6
500
1G1BL69ZIFH134734,
IGIBL69ZOFH135969g�
1G1BL5160HX218550
1GCGC24MOFJ123752,
.__..,..._
Sedan '85 Chevrolet Impala
„ '85 Impala
$87 " Gapric
Pickup with
Utility body '85 " C-20
49,600 4 Auto 6 Ye, $ 500
„ 500 „
62,000 4 6 �..�
82,000 4 8 " 500
100,000 2 " 8 No 500
We would
like to participate in icneck oeSL
dnsweri
T O R Y F 0 R M
September (Schaumburg Auction)
A U C T I O N I N V E N
x
October (11ount Prospect Auction)
Name: Public Works Department
,
If our auction of first choice is filled, we (check best answer)
Jurisdiction: Mount Prospect
mould like to be included in the
other auction.
X
.A .. .7
would not 11Ye to be include- ii,
Fl.n "tiicr auction.
,i,c u
Phone: 7081870-5640
TYPE OF VEHICLE YEAR BAKE MODEL
MILEAGE DOORS
CLYND.I
GOND. PRN t1Ui1
OTHER
COMMENTS
SERIAL NUMBER
auto{mans
1G1BL69ZIFH134734,
IGIBL69ZOFH135969g�
1G1BL5160HX218550
1GCGC24MOFJ123752,
.__..,..._
Sedan '85 Chevrolet Impala
„ '85 Impala
$87 " Gapric
Pickup with
Utility body '85 " C-20
49,600 4 Auto 6 Ye, $ 500
„ 500 „
62,000 4 6 �..�
82,000 4 8 " 500
100,000 2 " 8 No 500
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Inspection Services
DATE: July 24, 1991
SUBJECT: 1991 Resurfacing Program - Material Testing
Attached find a copy of the proposals received for material testing for the 1991
Resurfacing Program. The low proposal was submitted by Soil & Material Consultants,
Arlington Heights, IL This firm has done the material testing program in the past and has
done acceptable work.
I concur with the recommendation of the project engineer and engineering
coordinator to accept the proposal for material testing from Soils & Material Consultants.
Chuck
CB/m
xc: Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Director of Inspection Services
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: July 16, 1991
SUBJECT: 1991 Material Testing
Attached is a summary of costs for material testing for the 1991 Resurfacing
Program. I recommend that we award a contract to Soil & Material Consultants,
Arlington Heights, II, in the amount of $8,862.00. This contract will be funded
from,
Account No. 22-037-06-6617, $8,000.00
Account No. 22-037-06-6615, $ 862.00
Red Tennyson, P.E.
I concur with the above recommendation
I!
Jeffrey A. Wulbecker, P.E.
Engineering Coordinator
FT'/m
Attachment
1991 Resurfacing Program
Material Testing
Schedule of Prices
Estimated
Working
Item Units
1. Plant Inspection
Daily Inspection 200 Hr
2. Field Inspection
Technician wlNuclear Gauge 1 10 Day
3. Lab Testing
Extraction Analysis 25 Ea
Marshall Stability 6 Sets
Concretp Cylinders 64 Ea
Soil & Material Consultants
Arlington Hts., Ill.
Estimated
Unit Total
Price Cost
Professional Service Industries
Hillside, 111.
Estimated
Unit Total
Price Cost
H.H. Holmes Testing Lab., Inc.
Wheeling, 111.
Estimated
Unit Total
Price Cost
30.00
6,000.00
37.60
7,520.00
28.00
5,600.00
100.00
1,000.00
188.00
1,880.00
140.00
1,400.00
30.00
750.00
65.00
1,625.00
100.00
2,500.00
100.00
600.00
200.00
1,200.00
100.00
600.00
8.00
512.00
8.00
512.00
5.25
336.00
TOTAL
8,862,001
TOTAL
22,737.00
TOTAL
10,436.00
— Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois .. . . . . . . . . .
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
DATE: July 31, 1991
SUBJECT: STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
Due to the favorable bids received for our street resurfacing program, there was
approximately $648,500 left in the 1991-92 paving budget. Per your instructions, Public
Works and Engineering prepared an additional list of streets to add to this years program.
Attached is a copy of the additional streets recommended and the cost estimate for this
work.
Both contractors who were low bidders on our original program - Arrow Road Construction
Company for the pavement and Trialta Construction Company for curb and gutter - have
indicated they will extend their original contracts to include the additional streets.
The original contract with Arrow Road Construction Co., is -
(Resurfacing Program) $484,893.65
The addition to their Contract would be - $147, t. 11.75
$632,011.40
The original contract with Trialta Construction Co, is -
(Curb & Gutter Repair) $371,660.70
The addition to their Contract would be - $ 64,284.91
$435,945.61
TOTAL $1,067,957.01
This addition to the paving program will reduce the remaining paving budget to
$432,042.99 which will be used for street reconstruction projects this fall or next spring.
Please advise as to your review and comments on the proposed additional program and
funding.
Chuck Bencic
CB/FT/rn
xc: Director of Public Works
Finance Director
1991 Resurfacing Program
List of Streets
Original List
Streets To Be Added To Program
A.
Fairview Street
Gregory Street
Highland Street
Length
Estimated
No
Street Name
From
To
(ft)
Cost
1.
Mora Lane
Park Drive
Seminole Lane
2,280
42,386.65
2.
Memory Lane
Route 83
East End
1,323
28,231.05
3.
Emerson Street
Central Road
Gregory Street
2,680
54,420.55
4.
Elm Street
Central Road
Gregory Street
2,718
45,155.73
5.
Owen Street
Isabella Street
Gregory Street
655
10,225.99
6.
Thayer Street
Forest Avenue
Elmhurst Avenue
1,335
36,593.04
7.
Henry Street
Forest Avenue
Elmhurst Avenue
1,319
31,532.58
8.
Audrey Lane
Bonita Avenue
Central Road
2,685
83,253.22
9.
Audrey Court
Audrey Lane
Cul -De -Sac,
145
6,151.53
10,
Lincoln Street
Prairie Avenue
Busse Road
3,050
73,971.85
11.
HiLusi Avenue
Milburn Avenue
Prospect Avenue
1,932
34,867.35
12.
Pine Street
Milburn Avenue
Prospect Avenue
1,791
66,910.15
13.
loka Avenue
Route 83
Lincoln Street
1,350
37,148.90
14.
Emerson Street
Council Trail
Lincoln Street
1,363
27,064.30
15.
Shabonee Trail
Council Trail
Edward Street
1,321
30,923.01
16.
Council Trail
Emerson Street
E. of Edward Street
2,372
66,501.84
17.
School Street
Berkshire Lane
Shabonee Trail
1,603
48,267.19
18.
Berkshire Lane
School Street
William Street
740
17,628.00
19.
Lorinquist Boulevard
Busse Road
Robert Drive
996
33,575.35
20.
Emerson Street
Country Lane
Lorinquist Boulevard
1,686
32,234.01
21.
Palm Drive
Busse Road
Robert Drive
1,479
23,760.06
22.
Robert Drive
Cottonwood Lane
Willow Lane
1,459
25,752.00
Total
6.87 Miles
856,554.35
Streets To Be Added To Program
A.
Fairview Street
Gregory Street
Highland Street
1,338
28,668.35
B.
Memory Lane
Forest Avenue
Elmhurst Avenue
1,353
24,098.95
C.
Gregory Street
W. of Fairview Ave
Fairview Avenue
177
5,745.91
D.
Isabella Street
W. of Fairview Ave
Elmhurst Avenue
1,013
29,061.05
E.
School Street
Central Road
Gregory Street
2,697
39,500.25
F.
Thayer Street
Owen Street
Louis Street
969
14,426.15
G.
Louis Street
Northwest Highway
Central Road
2,587
41,521.65
H.
Milburn Avenue
W. of George Street
Mount Prospect Road
749
10,984.67
I.
Lincoln Street
W. of George Street
Mount Prospect Road
555
8,551.78
I.
N. Briarwood Drive
E. Briarwood Drive
Algonquin Road
471
8,843.98
Total 2.26 Miles
211,402.66
Combined Total 9.13 Miles 1,067,957.01
THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
it
a
Strest Nome
From
To
1. Mur. Lone
Park Drive
Seminole Lane
2. Memory Lane
Route 83
East End
3. Emer Street
Contra) Road
Gregory Street
4. Elm Street
Central Road
Gregory Street
5. Owen Street
Isabella Street
Grsgwy Street
6. Thayer Street
ForestAvenue
Elmhurst Avenu:
7. Henry Street
Forest Avenue
Elmhurst Avenue
8. Audrey Lane
Bonita Avenue
Central Road
9. Audrey Court
Audrey LaneCul—Ce—Soc
10. Uncoln Street
Prairie Avenue
Busse Road
11. HiLusi Avenue
Milbum Avenue
Prospect Avenu>
12, Pine Street
Route 83
Prospect Avenue
13. loko Avenue
Council Trail
Lincoln Street
14. Emerson Street
Council Trail
Lincoln Street
15. Shabonee Trail
Scholl Street
Edward Street
16. Council Trail
Emerson Street
E of Edward Sheet
17. School Street
Berkshire Lane
Shabonee Trail
18,Berkshire Lane
School Street
WRliom Street
19. Lannquist Boulevard
Busse. Rood
Robert Drive
20. Emerson Street
Country Lane
Lonnquist Boult vord
21. Palm Drive
Busse Rood
Robert Drive
22, Robert Drive
Cottonwood Lone
Willow Lane
A. Memory Lone
Forest Avenue
Elmhurst Avem e
8. Fairview Avenue
Highland Street
Gregory Street
C. Gregory Street
W. of Fairview Ave
Fairview Avenue
D. Isabella Street
W. of Foirdew Ave
ElmhurstAvenue
E. Schad Street
Centro) Road
Gregory Street
F. Thayer Strest
Owen Street
Louis Street
G. Louis Street
Northwest Highway Central Rood
H. Milburn Avenue
W. of George St
Mount Prospeo, Rood
L Lincoln Street
W, of George Sl
Mount Prosper Road
J. N. 86—ood Drive
E. Briarwood Dr
Algonquin Rao,
MAYOR
rERALO L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
MARK W BOSSE
11 �11NII
GEORGE A. CLOWES
TIMOTHY J CORCORAN
LEO FLOR09
PAUL WM. HOEFERT ALL
IRVANA K WiLKS Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056
CAROLA FIELDS
Rhone: 706 / 392-6000
Fax: 709 / 392-6022
DUE TO THE FACT THAT JULY, 1991 IS A "FIVE TUESDAY"
MONTH, THERE WILL BE NO MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD
MEETING ON JULY 30. THE NEXT SCHEDULED BOARD MEETING
WILL BE TUESDAY, AUGUST 6, 1991.