HomeMy WebLinkAbout4212_001VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4284«
Next Resolution No. 11-91`
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R O F B U S I N E 8 8
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Tina immilimmummomon
Meeting Room, lot Floor Wednesday
Senior Citizen Center April 3, 1991 April 3, 1991
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. p
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald 118kip" Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Donald Weibel
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Corcoran
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, MARCH 19, 1991
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR#S REPORT
A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends the Code to permit food
items to be sold at liquor counters in larger
grocery stores. (Exhibit A)
B. Change in name and corporate structure for
the Old Orchard Country Club Restaurant.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 9-V-91, 1625 East Dogwood Lane
lot reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1625 DOGWOOD LANE
This Ordinance grants a variation to permit two
accessory buildings on one lot of record. Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 5-1. (Exhibit B)
B. ZBA 10-V-91, 1715 Robbie Lane
lot reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1715 ROBBIE LANE
This Ordinance grants a variation to permit a
driveway width of 28' 10" at the widest point
to accommodate an existing patio. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by a.
vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
C. ZBA 6-Z-91 and ZB
1. 1st reading
OFFICIAL ZON
MOUNT PROSPE
This Ordinar
from R-1 to
building.
recommended
vote of 6-0.
ll -V-91, 412 and 414 E. Rand Road
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
G MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF
rezones the subject property
2 for a 2 -story office
e Zoning Board of Appeals
anting this request by a
2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
VARIATION FOA PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD
This Ordinance grants a variation to
waive the required loading space. The
Zoning Boardlof Appeals recommended
granting this ' variation by a vote of 5-1.
3. ist reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL LAND USE (COMPREHENSIVE PLAN)
MAP OF THE VJLIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends the Comprehensive
Plan to reflect the Business Office use,
for the subj#'ct property. The Plan
Commission recommended granting this
amendment by�a vote of 8-0.
4. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING
A MODIFICATION FROM THE DEVELOPMENT
CODE (CHAPTER, 16)
This Ordinance grants a modification
from the Development Code by waiving the
requirement 'to install street lights on
Rand Road, subject to execution of a
Restrictive Covenant guaranteeing the
installation of the required street
lights at a ' future date. The Plan
Commission recommended granting this
modificatioi4 by a vote of 8-0.
5. A RESOLUTIO14 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD
This Resolution authorizes a Restrictive
Covenant guaranteeing the installation
of street lights on Rand Road at a future
date to be 14 1 etermined by IDOT or the
Village.
D. ZBA 12-V-91, 230,- 240 East Lincoln Street
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 230-240 LINCOLN
This Ordinance giants variations to allow a
5 foot interior sideyard for a parking lot, rather
than the required 10 feet; a 15 foot front yard for
parking, rather than the required :30 feet; and, to
waive the required loading space. The Petitioner
would like to cotstruct a new industrial building
on the subject p0perty. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these variations
by a vote of 6-0.
I
E. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16
(DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amends the language governing
Recaptures. Thea Plan Commission recommends
approving this �' endment by a vote of 8-0.
a'm
(Exhibit D)
(Exhibit E)
(Exhibit F)
(Exhibit G)
(Exhibit H)
(Exhibit J)
(Exhibit K)
IS. NEW BUSINESS
,A.
ZBA 14-V-91, 214 South Louis
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a 3 foot sideyard, instead of the required 5 feet,
for a detached garage; to allow a six foot fence
along the interior side and rear lot lines, rather
than 5 feet; and, to allow 52.6% lot coverage,
rather than the permitted 45%. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting these variations
by a vote of 7-0.
B.
ZBA 15-V-91 and ZBA 16 -SU -91, 900 North Wolf Road,
Northwest Assembly of God Church
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
lot coverage of 62%, rather than the permitted
35%; to allow a 50 foot dome building height,
rather than the permitted maximum 28 feet; to
allow 8.5 foot wide parking stalls, rather
than the required 9 foot width; and, a special
use to allow a garage designed to house more
than two motor vehicles. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests by
a vote of 7-0.
C.
Wal-Mart Plat of Subdivision
This subdivision creates one lot of record.
The Plan Commission has reviewed this plat
and recommended approvalby a vote of 6-0.
D.
A RESOLUTION DECLARING THE RESULTS OF THE
GENERAL ELECTION HELD APRIL 2, 1991
(Exhibit L)
E.
1st reading Of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance establishes a 3% tax on hotel/
motels.
(Exhibit M)
F.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE V
ENTITLED "METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
(Exhibit N)
G.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
(TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance increases the fine for parking
violations from $10.00 to $20.00.
(Exhibit 0)
H.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE ANNUAL
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991/92 FOR THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
(Exhibit P)
I.
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
This Resolution appropriates $150,000 for the
Sunset Road reconstruction project.
(Exhibit Q)
J.
Accept improvements installed in conjunction with
the Village Commons Condominium project - Elm
and Evergreen.
K.
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
This Resolution appropriates $962,000, as
required by the Illinois Department of
Transportation for the annual street maintenance.
(Exhibit R)
X.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
-A. Bid Results: i
1. One compact station wagon
2. Two 3/4 ton pickup trucks
3. One 53,000 lid. GvwR tandem truck cab and chassis
4. one 35,000 10. GVWR truck cab and chass*s
5. Landscape Village parking lot, Main & B}isse
6. Turf mowing
B. Request to waive the bidding procedure and
authorize the purchase of an emergency
generator at the dire Station on Kensington Road.
C. Accept proposal from R3'N Engineering for the
storm water manag+ ant engineering plan.
D. Agreement with financial advisor relative to
the issuance of General Obligation Bonds.
1
E. Agreement with Bond Counsel relative to the
issuance of Generll Obligation Bonds.
F. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MARCH 19, 1991
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 PM
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Tim Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Donald Weibel
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Arthur. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of the MINUTES
Mayor and Board of Trustees held March 5, 1991.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 780,835
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
11,155
Community Development Block Grant Fund
1,668
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
68,084
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
339,819
Parking System Revenue Fund
3,728
Risk Management Fund
43,673
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
455
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
3,755
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
406
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
12,795
Flexcomp Trust Fund
10,108
Escrow Deposit Fund
14,437
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
-
Benefit Trust Fund
2,167
$1,923,085
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
accept the financial report January 31, 1991 through
February 28, 1991, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
j'
COMM MI TIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
FIRE/POLICE
John Eifring, member of theCitizsns' Committee
STATION
gage a rief presentation in uippo?t of, the new Fire
REFERENDUM
and POI Station, asking the voters to vote Yes on,
the ref'k6ndum"April 2nd.
TRAILER IN
Richardendricks, 1537 E. Ezan►ersozi Lane;, stated that
FRONT YARD
a boat =has been parked in the front yard of a
neighbo�' dome many months. Upon reviewing the onin
Ordinan Mr. Hendricks feels ;that this is not
, .`
permits `° `and asked: that action be taken to enforce the
re+ uli i s , of `the Vill age,.
villager';Manager Dixon stated that ;the administration
has re'ponded to the concerns fexpressed: by lir.
Hendric;noting that no regulations are being
violat . However, a legal oinionhas teen requested
of legscounsel relative to the f4ntei retation of
Section'la.11Oi:B as cited by Mr ;Hendricks;.
Mr. Hen"ficks asked each member of the Board if they
agreed, fh his interpretation of Section 14.1101.B.
Trustee, Corcoran and Fioros? tated that,they tend to
agree h Mr. Hendricks but ou�d lite, to see the
„ion of this matter.The other members of the
legal , -"n - -
Boards ,ated that they would reserve dud � nt until the
legal o#inion was received.
r
RIVER TRAILS
Dori Cra„g, 1614 Barberry, started tat while the Ricer
COMMUNITY ASSOC.
Trails dmmunity Association auppo�d the widening; of
SUPPORT NEW FIREEuclid
V' enue they wanted to gb,,gin �cord�,as supporting
& POLICE STATION
the reErendum question on the April 2nd ballot and
encoura;° � the residents to vote, Sys' on the new Fire
and Po]'ce Station.
EUCLID AVENUE
Trust” Corcoran stated that while there has been
IMPROVEMENT
consiId discussion on the Cool, Country proposal to
widen;; E olid Avenue, he would like to <meet with the
resides and members of the River TrailCommunity
Assoc' ; ion to explore the passi3 ility of a 'middle
,
ground" 6tween the improvemehtr :proose+d by Cook County
and wh l'r- would be agreeable to the, residents.
MAYOR* $ A2P+tl RT
PRESENTATION:
On behof the Government Financial Officers
DAVID JEPSON
Associa�son, Mayor Farley presented the Certificate
of Ex,c fence in FinancialRReportl'ng to David Jepson,
Finance Director of the VillgeMayor Farley notes
that th is the 7th consecute year that Uavi.d Jepson
has bei 'honored for his financial expertise.
PROCLAMATION;
Mayor „Eley proclaimed May , 1991 as $a iowr Citizen
SENIOR CITIZEN
Celebr ;;ion bay in Mount Prowpect it has noted; that
CELEBRATION DAY
activi° 6s will take place dnorimg Senior iti en.
MAY 1, 1991
at Ran" iIurst Shopping Center on May lst.
POLICE EXPLORERS
Theelected officers of, the Mount prospect Police
'
PRESENTED
Ep1r„ ;s Past took their, Caths sof Office and Frere
press n to the Village lard. Tne new Officera,are»
M11"ghael Seegers, Post Chief
Eraard Bi inkman, 'Sergeant
J Wade, Sergeant
AMEND CH. 13
An Ordnance was presented, for second reading that
CREATE CLASS "R"
wouldcreate a Class 11R11 liquor Acense,forsNina
Prospect Commons
NINA RESTAURANT
Restau'ant, to be located in the Mojznt
Shoppig;Center (Golf & Busse Roads).
,,,age 2 - March 19, 1991
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved
ORD.NO. 4280
for passage of Ordinance No, 4280
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEWOWNERS
A request was presented from the new owners of
MR. PETERS
Mr. Peters Banquet Hall located in the Mount Prospect
BANQUET HALL
Plaza to permit continued operation under the
existing Class "Ell liquor license.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
CLASS "Ell
to authorize the continued operation of Mr. Peters
LIQUOR
Banquet Hall under new ownership with the existing
LICENSE
Class "Ell liquor license.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem; Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented from the new owners of
THE LIQUOR
the Liquor Shoppe, 1728 West Dempster Street,
SHOPPE TO
to permit continued operation under the existing
JAY LIQUOR
Class "C" liquor license. It was noted that the
new name of this establishment will be Jay Liquor.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
CLASS "C"
to authorize the new owners of this establishment,
LIQUOR
known as Jay Liquor, to continue operation under
LICENSE
the existing Class "C" liquor license.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented that would amend Chapter 13 AMEND CH. 13
by deleting the prohibition restricting specified
cash registers from selling nothing but alcoholic
beverages. It was noted that this restriction
prohibited grocery stores with liquor departments
from checking out non-alcoholic items, which caused
a hardship.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading
at the next meeting of the Village Board on April 3rd.
OLD BUSINESS
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that AMEND
would amend Ordinance Na. 4164, granting variations ORD.NO.4164
to property located at 215 East Prospect Avenue. 215E.PROSECT
It was noted that the variations granted in
Ordinance No. 4164 were valid for a one year period
and while the Petitioner desires to go forward with
the improvement necessitating the variations, it
would not begin until after the one year limitation.
Page 3 - March 19, 1991
iF
Trusts` loros; seconded ?by Trustee Arthur, moved to
waive t'e�rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon rdl calls Ayes: Arthur,,,,Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Weibel
Ij Nays: None
Motion harried.
ORD.NO. 4281 Trustee'Floros,'seconded by Trusts Arthur, moved ;for
passage of Ordinance No. 4281
J
ORDINANCE AMENDING OADINAkE NO. 4164
FC% PROPERTY ;COMMONLY KNOWN AS
21°EAST PROSPECT AVENUE
Upon rol call: Ayes: Arthur, +Buss, Corcoran, Floras,
van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion�'arried.
AMEND ORD. 41"70 An Ordi ante was presented for first reading ;that would
7 S.EDWARD amend trdinance No., 4170. This, ordinance granted
variat'"` tis to permit a room addition, which variations
are va,id for a one year period. The Petitioner
intend` o proceed with thisimprclz�ement, however, he
t
will,b unable to obtain a building permit within the
one ye,,, -permitted.
Trustee% Arthur, seconded by Trusts Corcoran, moved to
waive t ,e rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
f
r
Upon r l call: Ayes; Arthur,Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays-; None
Motion,carried.
ORD.NO. 4282 Truste" Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved for
passaig of Ordinance No. 4282
;1 o
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4170
F9,R;PROPERTY LOCATED AT 7 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
Upon rcUl call Ayes: Arthur,Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: 'None
motion''carried.
NEW BU S8
ZBA 9-V-91 ZBA 9 91,1625 Dogwood Lane
1625 DOGWOOD The Petitioner is 'requesting the fallowing variations:
i
1. T�,allow an accessory building 13 feet in height,
r,ther than the permitted 1tJ�feet;
l
2.
owl two accessory buil pings;on one lot
3. T allow an 18" sideyard, rather than the minimum
o4'5 feet; t
4T ;allow a one foot septation between the
principal structure and an %accessorybuilding,
r?tther than the required 10 feetr
age 4 March 19, 19'l
i;.
The Zoning Board of Appeals voted to deny the request
for a 13 foot height structure by a vote of 3-3;
to approve two accessory buildings by a vote of 6-0;
to approve the relocation of the shed resulting in an
1811 sideyard by a vote of 5-1; and, to approve a one
foot separation between structures by a vote of 5-1.
The Petitioner noted that the structure being the
subject of this case is a playhouse for his 2 children.
He stated that he applied for and was granted a building
permit but was unaware of the 10 foot height restriction.
The Petitioner also stated that the playhouse is on
stilts which enables him to maintain the grass underneath.
Mr. Krawiek, 1627 Dogwood, expressed his objection to
this structure based on the fact that he considered it
unsightly.
Trustee Van Geem, stated that he could support the play-
house structure if the height was lowered to meet the
permitted 10 foot height.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
grant the request to allow the 13 foot high structure.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse
Nays: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Motion failed
Trustee Weibel, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant
the request to permit 2 accessory structures on one
lot.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and permit an 1811 sideyard, rather than the
required 5 feet.
Upon roll call: Ayes: None
Nays: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Motion failed.
Inasmuch as the other requests were denied, the request
to approve a one foot separation between structures
was mute at this point. ,
An ordinance will be presented at the next regular meeting
on April"3rd to permit two accessory buildings on one
lot of record.
ZBA 10-V-91, 1715 Robbie Lane
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow ZBA 10-V-91
a driveway width of 281 1011 at the widest point to 1715 ROBBIE
accommodate an existing patio. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0.
Page 5 - March 19, 1991
l
TrusteelBusse, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to
concur �iththe recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals'�a grant the variation requested in ZBA 10-V-
91
t
Upon ro call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: 'None
Motion �" dried.
An Ordi ice will be presented for (first reading at the
next m'uing of the Village Hoard on April 3rd.
r
ZBA 6-Z-91 ZBA 6 ,:1 and ZBA 11=V-91, 412-41 E. Rand Road
ZBA 11-V-91 The Pet °boner is requesting the ftrllowIng:
412-414 E.RAND
1. To Rezone the subject property, from, R-1 to B-2 in
or er to construct an office brilding. The Zoning
Bo; ^ of Appeals recommended granting this request
2. A piat ion to waive the required loading space.
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
t 0 %s request by 4 vote of 5-V
3. An axaendment to the Compreheniive Plan to reflect
G' 'I ural Commercial/Office zoning, rather than the
SingleFamily. The( Plan Commission
r ;,'.ix=ended granting this request by a vote of
8 �
4. AJ dification from the Development Code (Chapter
lf, to waive the 'requirement to install street
i ' , s on Rand Road provided that"a Restrictive
C f ' nAnt 'is executed guaranteeing installation at
a %'iiture date. The Plan commission recommended
gr meting this request by a vote of 8-0.
The pe;`itioner statedthat It is his intention to
const a 2 -story building to house a real estate
office%" possible a mortgage company with 58 parking
spaces`
The Pet ti6ner has met with the neighbors relative to
this pr;;' mesal.` The following residents expressed their
opinio" on this request:
Rdent, 522 Hill Street
M;;. Dougherty, 520 Hill Street
G le Reese, 526 Hill Street
R,'ident, 504 Eastman
1
Some of; the concerns expressed by the neighbors are as
follow
T e entrance/exit (curb cut); should be on Rand
Road, not Hill Street,
Traffic congestion,
H" s of operation; I
8' aing would provided bet'
et een residential and
the office,buildin ,
i
There a8 discussion by the _Villi ge Board as to ,the
approp r to location, for the, drive ay -" curb -cut. ,The
Petxtilner stated that it was his;; understanding that
the IIIlnois Department of Transportation would ;not
permit,, a driveway on Rand Roadr however, either
locatill'would °be acceptable..
age 6 March 19, 1901
f
It was the opinion of the Village Board that the
Petitioner should seek approval from IDOT to
locate the driveway on Rand Road, however, if
that approval was not granted then the project
could proceed with the driveway on Hill Street.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the rezoning requested in
ZBA 6-Z-91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
at the April 3rd meeting of the Village Board.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant
the variation requested in ZBA 11-V-91 and waive
the required loading dock space.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
at the April 3rd meeting of the Village Board.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Plan
Commission and amend the Comprehensive Plan to
reflect General Commercial/Office zoning for the
property located at 412-414 East Rand Road.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
at the next Village Board meeting on April 3rd.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Plan
Commission and grant the modification from the
Development Code requiring the installation of
street lights on Rand Road, provided a Restrictive
Covenant is executed guaranteeing the installation
of said street lights at a future date.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading
on April 3rd as well as a Resolution authorizing
execution of a Restrictive Covenant relative to
street lights.
Page 7 - March 19, 1991
ZBA 12-V-91
ZBA 12 h ;°91, 230-240 East Lincoln Street
230-240 EAST
The ,s;, Toner is requesting,variations to allow a,
for ng 1Ot rather than
LINCOLN ST.
5 foot ;, terior sideyard aA park
the ed 10 feet; a 15 foot front yard forparking,
re
rather % :hon the required 30 'feet,, and, to waive the
requirloading space. The Zol ig Board of Appeals
reco" ;fed granting these requests by a vote of 6-0.
1
The Penoted that he;,woulo like to construct
;-boner;
a one ,ry office/warehouses building on this vacant
lot to the configuration of the lot, which :is
narrow?fiut deep, these variations are requested in
order ;;:have a viable building. y
Trus Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
concur; ith the recommendati6n'of the Zoning Board of
Appeal'";;and grant the variations rjequested in ZBA 12-
V-91.
D
Upon 'r call: Ayes: Arthur, BussO, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: -None
Moti.oncarred. gp
J
An OrNd e "ncwill be presented for firstreading at, the
next ,`ting of the Village,Boardon april.3rd,
ZBA 13-A-91
ZBA 13 ;;91, Text Amendment,;
the height limitation ;for
TEXT AMENDMENT
This t„` amendment proposes
fences -e increased from 5 feet t% 6 feet as well_as
other a„,ext changes to clarify areas of the fence
regula,,,l/ns. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
these amendments bye<a vote of 5-1..
grand;
Trustees Arthur and Van Geem left the meeting for a'
AMEND CH.16
brief period at this point in the meeting.
RECAPTURES
A request was presented for a field change to the Old
FIELD
Orchard Lexington Development to permit townhomes and/
CHANGE:
or manorhomes. It was noted that under the existing
OLD ORCHARD
Consent Decree, only manorhomes are permitted and
LEXINGTON
the developer would like the flexibility of offering
DEVELOPMENT
either type of dwelling unit.
AMEND CH.18
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to
ADOPT STATE
grant the field change requested to permit either
VEHICLE CODE
manorhomes or townhomes to be built of the balance
of the Lexington's development.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustees Arthur and Van Geem returned to the meeting
at this point.
The Lake Center Plaza Plat of Resubdivision was
LAKE CENTER
presented. This plat changes the configuration
PLAZA
of one lot within this development. The Plan
RESUBDIVISION
Commission recommended approving this resubdivision.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest
his signature on the Lake Center Plaza plat of
resubdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH.16
would amend the language governing future Recaptures.
RECAPTURES
The Plan Commission recommended this amendment
by a vote of 8-0.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading
at the next regular meeting of the Village Board on
April 3rd.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH.18
would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) by adopting
ADOPT STATE
Chapter 95-1/2 "Illinois Vehicle Code" of the
VEHICLE CODE
State Statutes.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD:NO. 4283
Page 9 - March 19, 1991
%i
, J
l/
ORD.NO. 4283
Trustee, Arthur,'seconded by'Truste6 Corcoran, moved
for passe of Ordinance No.�4283 ;,
AN K7RDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
Upon to l%;;call: Ayes: Arthur ,;Bussej Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geer►, Weibel
Nays: None:
Motion,J ,ied
CHANGE MEETING
Mayor F'„ f ey noted that :the next regular meeting of, the
DATE
Village "ard is April 2nd, election day:. While there
are no cumbents for'Village�Trustee running in
this
electib'„'` the 'Clerk's Office will be;;, involved in
gathers;” election results, therefore the regular
meeting. hould be changed to,April 3rd.
Trustee�4eibel seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
change;«, date of the regular meeting of the Village
Board April 2nd to«Aprkl 3rd
Upon ro;] call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse;, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion rrried
REVIEW VILLAGE
It was ted that Village Manager John Fuf7.ton Dixon head
MANAGER
his a-, review in Executive Session on March 12th'.
l /
Trustee'�Wan Geem, seconded by TruseeBusse,- moved to
increa ;the Village Manager" salary -$4,200.00_per
«
year increase his car' allowance by 525.00 per
month.
t,
I,
Upon rorl,call: Ayes: Arthur,Bussd;, Corcoran, Floros,
'Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion; srried.
VI "ft Is RzVORT
TAXI CAB SERVICE
Villg: kanager John Fultc>n Dixon cave a status report
REVIEW
on the ° l,ity of service offered by taxi cab companies
in the village. It was noted that when this ;matter was
discus;" 3 months ago, irk conjunction with a taxi, ;cab
fared lease, tate service offered would be reviewed
by the 4,11age Board,
Mr. D1noted that while there were svome complaints
on the quality of service, the overall service was
withitt,acceptable standards and he jecommended the taxi
cab fa il increase : remain in ieffec
Truste«;Busse, seconded by 'Trustee Floros, move to
retain '% ae taxi cab fare. increase 4#opted: 3 months ago.
Upon,r' 1,„] call: Ayes: Arthur�s Busso, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Mot ion;
carried»
%ge 10 March 19, 1991
Mr. Dixon stated that the refuse service contract REFUSE BIDS
expires at the end of July. Bids were received
and are being reviewed by staff. It was noted
that there is a possibility that the Village could
adopt a plan that permits one container per single
family unit per week and residents would be charged
for additional containers.
This entire subject will be discussed during the
Committee of the Whole meeting on March 26th.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
It was reported by the Cable T. V. Coordinator,
Cheryl Pasalic, that TCI has sent notices to its
customers that their rates will be increased as
of July, 1991. The Village has not received notice
of an increase, as required in the franchise agreement
and Mrs. Pasalic will communicate that fact to TCI.
ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Farley declared the meeting adjourned at 11:43 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 11 - March 19, 1991
General & Special Revenue Funds
Receipts
General Fund
Cash & Invest
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
3/15/91 through
Community Development Block Grant
Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement
Fund
Enterprise Funds
Entry 3128191
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Internal Service Funds
$1,968,167
Risk Management Fund
$ 5,001,788
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
83,247
Capital Projects
569,191
Capital Improvement, Repl or
Repair Fund
Downtown Redev Const Fund
1985
Downtown Redev Const Fund
1991
Debt Service Fund
260,127
Trust & Agency Funds
319,533
Flexcomp Trust Fund
3,416,211
Escrow Deposit Fund
6,726
Police Pension Fund
188,774
Firemen's Pension Fund
154,831
Benefit Trust Funds
1,261,732
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
March 28, 1991
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
3/15/91 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
3114191
3128191
List of Bills
Entry 3128191
$ 3,506,704
$1,968,167
$473,083
$ 5,001,788
486,785
83,247
841
569,191
3,185
6,000
8,592
593
142,177
129,127
11,177
260,127
3,158,849
319,533
62,171
3,416,211
183,348
6,726
1,300
188,774
1,182,904
154,831
76,003
1,261,732
356,894
-
12,251
344,643
430,664
45,108
67,207
408,565
177,113
13,900
531
190,482 r
989,815
97,168
-
1,086,983
124
3,633
-
3,757
1,325.,955
24,371
14,112
1,336,214
15,509,596
102,562
40,732
15,571,426
17,493,896
109,992
42,338
17,561,550
255,757
255,757
$45,203,766
$3,064.365
$ 810,338
$ $47,457,793
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ARMCOR DESIGN & BUILD
BOND REFUND
REIMB OVERPMT LIFE INS
$50.00
$141.00
$50.00
$141.00
KURT ASPEN
CASIMIRA BIELSKI
AMB PMT OVERPMT
$125.00
$125.00*
SONG NAM CHUN
REFUND COST -SHARE TREE
$50.00
$50.00.
CINNAMON COVE COMPANY
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$2.28
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$2.28
REFUND OVERPMT FINAL BILL
$2.28
$6.84
CLAUSS FUELS, INC.
FUEL
$9,093.79
$9,093.79*
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PMT P/R 3/21/91
$224.25
$224.25*
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNTP/R
ENDING 3121%91
$366,336.04
ENDING
,195.8
$1$870.78
P R ENDING 3f21f91
P ENDING 3/21191
$34,481.12
$402,883.02*
DOYLE SIGNS, INC
BOND REFUND 0488
BOND REFUND 0526
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND 0528
$100.00
BOND REFUND 0611
$100.00
BOND REFUND 0612
$100.0.0
$500.00
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3114
$644.40
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3114
$646.11
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3114
$7.24
SAVINGS BONDS P/R 3/21/91
$400.00
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 121
$10,532.24
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3121
$92.30
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3121
$65.98,
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3121
$2,591.82
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3121
$875.10
$15,855.19*
FREDIANI HOMES INC.
BOND REFUND 1328
$100.00
$100.00
MICHAEL P. GORDON
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$10.00
$99.00
$10.00
$99.00
IMRF VOLUNTARY LIFE
JOSEPH BUILDERS
MARCH 91 PREMIUM
BOND REFUND C8535
$35.00
$35.00
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT P/R 3/21191
$254.00
$254.00*
KATHCON PROPERTIES
BOND REFUND 0654/0793
$250.00
$250.00
PETER H. LAZZARA
REFUND STICKER OVERPMT
$15.00
$15.00
C. LEHNERT
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$18.24
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.76
$20.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE -2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3%28/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
LOMBARDO ROOFING
BOND REFUND C8552
$35.00
$6.84
$35.00
MARY L. MOORE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.66
$7.50
KLAUS MOSCH
REFUND COST SHARE TREE
PPRT 2ND ALLOCATION
$50.00
$3,074.75
$50.00
$3,074.75#
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
REFUND SALES TAX OVERPMT
$2,412.69
$2,492.65
MRS. P & ME
REFUND
$500.00
OPUS
_BOND
SND
PALDO SIGN & DISPLAY CO.
BOND REFUND 1318
$100.00
$22.80
$100.00
JOSEPH PAPLACZYK
REFUND FINAL BILL
REFUND FINAL BILL
$2.20
$25.00
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
MAR FIRE PENSION DISB
MAR POLICE PENSION DISB
$42,337.70
$40,732.07
$83,069.77*
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$102.00
$55.00
$157.00*
PICKUS CONST. & EQUIPMENT
MISC EXPENSES
BOND REFUND C0519
$2,000.00
$460.00
$2,000.00
$460.00
CATHERINE M. PROVENZA
REFUND R/E TRANSFER TAX
BOND REFUND C7404
$450.00
$450.00
ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO.
HANS ROSENOW ROOFING COMPANY
REFUND MTCE GUARANTEE
$500.00
$500.00
SCISSORS CITY
REFUND WATER BILL OVERPMT
$647.52
$62.48
$710.00
REFUND WATER BILL OVERPMT
$50.00
$50.00
CHIANGSHENG SHIH
REFUND COST -SHARE TREE
$66.00
STATE OF ILLINOIS
LIQUOR APP RECORD CK-GEICK
LIQUOR APPLICANT RECORD CK
$33.00
$99.00-
P. R. STREICH & SONS, INC.
BOND REFUND C8540
$100.00
$25.00
$100.0(
$25.00
SUNNY PLBG. & SEWER
BOND REFUND C0512
REFUND HLTH INS CONT
$38.34
$38.34
CLIFF THIELITZ
THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT
BOND MONEY
$2,350.00
$350.00
BOND MONEY
BOND MONEY
2,450.00
BOND MONEY
$1,470.00
$6,620.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AMBULANCE KALCHIN 904020-1
$125.00
$500.00
$125.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE C2882
C4112
$100.00
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPECTION FEE C6421
$100.00
REINSPECTION FEE C7807
$50.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
INVOICE AMOUNT
PAGE 3
TOTAL
$1,305.00
$100.00
$531,906.14
$1,287.38
$38,488-.39
$38:34
$42,337.70
********************************************************************************************************
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
DONATION-WERDERITCH
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
1991 PIC RECOGNITION DINNER
$279.39
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C8202
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C8349
$50.00
$100.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C8512
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C8535
$15.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
CB552
$15.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
0867
$100.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
0867
$250.00
WEIDNER SEWER SERVICE
BOND REFUND C8568
$100.00
CLEARING ,ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
GENERAL FUND
$382,796.61
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK
GRANT
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,176.64
WATER & SEWER FUND
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$936.76
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
POLICE PENSION FUND
$40,732.07
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$14,112.25
PAGE 3
TOTAL
$1,305.00
$100.00
$531,906.14
$1,287.38
$38,488-.39
$38:34
$42,337.70
********************************************************************************************************
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
AMERICAN HEART ASSOCIATION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
DONATION-WERDERITCH
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
1991 PIC RECOGNITION DINNER
$279.39
$50.00
$50.0
$18.44
$14.09
$20.00
$76.86
$129.39*
$100.00
$100.00
***TOTAL**
$279.39
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
EDWARD FRANCE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$25.00
$25.00
PAGE 4
MARISHA JASON
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$25.00
$25.00
MELANIE KRUPP
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
$48.89
$48.89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
ARNSTEIN & LEHR
SERVICES RENDERED
$419.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,469.80
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,424.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$340.90
SERVICES RENDERED
$315.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$3,250.00
$7,219.20
CHANNING L. BETE COMPANY INC.
��
DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE CTR
-ADVANCE--EXPENSES
$154.25
--30.00
$154.25
YY-39-.-011
M LVVYN BOTS
BURKE AND RYAN
LEGAL SERVICES -FEB
$625.00
$625.00
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
EMPLOYEE PHYSICAL-WROBELL
$178.00
$35.65
$178.00
$35.65
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$.75
MISC EXPENSES
$29.63
MISC EXPENSES
$8.68
MISC EXPENSES
$123.51
MISC EXPENSES
$16.10
$178.67*
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
IN
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
RECORDER/TRANSCRIBER
$44.44
$399.00
$44.44*
$399.00
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS,
PRENTICE HALL, INC.
REFERENCE HANDBOOK
$45.07
$45.07
VON BRIIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
SERVICES RENDERED
$2,356.91
$2,356.91
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$11,966.19
GENERAL FUND
$11,966.19
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
EDWARD FRANCE
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
MARISHA JASON
COMM ASST COW MTG
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
MELANIE KRUPP
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$48.89
$48.89
CHERYL L. PASAI,TC
EXPENSES
$3.83
$3.83
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$20.00
$17.90
$37.90
TASCHO SAEMS
COMM ASST COW MTG
$25.00
$25.00
FRANK SMITH
COMM ASST ZONING BRD MTG
$25.00
$25.00_
WORD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES, IN
SHIPPING & HANDLING CHGS
$2.89
$2.8
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
MISC EXPENSES
***TOTAL**
$218.51
GENERAL FUND $218.51
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GEORGE J. HAMMES
SERVICES RENDERED
$870.00
$870.00
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
TR TAX TRANSACTIONS MAR91
$250.00
$250.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$9.13
$5.00
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$1.25
MISC EXPENSES
$4.58
$19.96*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$126.58
$52.80
$126.58
$52.8r
RCM DATA CORP
SHESHUNOFF INFO. SERVICES INC.
PROGRAMMERS MANUAL
REPORTS
$207.95
$207.9'u
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERY
MONTHLY CHGS 1090 COPIER
$18.20
$614.13
$18.20
$614.13
XEROX CORP.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
MICE SERVICE APRIL
$12.42
$12.42
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$2,172.04
GENERAL FUND
$2,172.04
********************************************************************************************************
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
ROBERT DOOLITTLE
TQM DOROW
HMO ILLINOIS
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
PETER LAMPRINAKOS
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
POSTMASTER
PAUL ZIEMBO
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM -MAR
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 6
$43,568.44
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
MED CLAIMS THRU 3/21/91
$1,137.38
PAYMENT DATE 3%28/91
$12,615.48
$66,421.57*
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
$115.26
HEALTH INSURANCE MARCH
$7,920.21
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$124.95
$83.23
$208.18
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC EXPENSES
$9.13
$9.13
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
$166.00
***TOTAL**
$217.31
GENERAL FUND
MAILBOX REIMBURSEMENT
$26.83
$26.83
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
ROBERT DOOLITTLE
TQM DOROW
HMO ILLINOIS
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
PETER LAMPRINAKOS
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
POSTMASTER
PAUL ZIEMBO
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM -MAR
$9,100.27
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 3/19/91
$43,568.44
MED CLAIMS THRU 3/21/91
$1,137.38
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 3/27
$12,615.48
$66,421.57*
REIMB GLASSES
$110.00
$110.00
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
$115.26
$115.26
HEALTH INSURANCE MARCH
$7,920.21
$7,920.21
SURETY BOND PREMIUM
$900.00
$900.00
INSURANCE REIMBURSEMENT
$250.00
$250.00
SERVICES RENDERED-UGOLINI
$166.00
$166.00
POSTAGE FOR HLTH MAGAZINE
$55.24
$55.2!
MAILBOX REIMBURSEMENT
$26.83
$26.83
***TOTAL**
$75,965.11
$75,965.11
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
CRAIG CHARAK
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$38.20
$130.15
$168.35
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
PAYMENT DATE 3/28%91
$11.01
$79.99
$11.01
$79-99
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
REGISTER-ROELS,KRUPA
$39.00
$13.61
$39.00
$13.61
B & H INDUSTRIES
DRAFTING SUPPLIES
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$285.00
$285.00
COMPUTERLAND
FIDELITY PRODUCTS CO.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$55.70
$55.70
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$18.59
$50.30
$68.89
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEFT.
MISC EXPENSES
$9.14
$4.57
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$19.48
MISC EXPENSES
$35.05
MISC EXPENSES
$14.58
$82.82*
SCHWAAB, INC.
STAMP & PAD
$34.25
$238.02
$34.25
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$552.00
$790.02
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
SUPPLIES
$14.27
$385.00
$14.27
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EXTENS
REGISTRATION - JAKES
$445.00
$830.00
VAN NOSTRAND REINHOLD
REGISTRATION-KRUPA
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$41.95
$25.54
$41.95
$25.54
JEFFREY WULBECKER
XL/DATACOMP INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MICE SERVICE APRIL
$12.42
$12.42
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$2,293.47
GENERAL FUND
$2,293.47
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CRAIG CHARAK
SEMINAR EXPENSES
$38.20
$130.15
$168.35
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
EXPENSES
BH66-JT-5422-A
$11.01
$79.99
$11.01
$79-99
COMPUTERLAND
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT
$967.50
$967.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3128%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
DOUGLAS TV
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
$330.00
$330.00
BARBARA FELTEN
SEMINAR EXPENSES
$18.80
$18.80
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
$78.00
MICHAEL J. GOY
EXPENSES
$82.80
$82.80
H R HART PHOTO
FILM PROCESSING
$73.48
$73.46
$466_86
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
•�
$�33�
KALE UNIFORMS
NAMEPLATE-BUSSER
$3.95
SUPPLIES
$218.44
$222.39
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$277.24
$277.24
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
KEYBOARD COVERS
$61.90
KEYBOARD COVERS
$29.80
$91.70
METROMEDIA PAGING SERVICES
LOST PAGER DEDUCTABLE
$50.00
$50.00
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS,, INC.
TONER
$86.50
TONER
$88.31
$174.81
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
TACTICAL UNIT CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.00
NATIONAL LAW ENFORCE. INST.INC
GANG SEMINAR REGISTRATION
$390.00
$390.00
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI
TUITION-GORSKI, WILCOX
$80.00
$80.00
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
COMPUTER PAPER
$578:40
$578,4(1
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$29.56
$29.56
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
STRAYS FEB 91
$192.00
$192.00
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
TRANSFER LISTING FORMS
$117.45
$117.45
ROBERT RIORDAN
SEMINAR EXPENSE
$30.00
$30.00
SAVE -A -PET
STRAYS FEB 91
$140.00
$140.0(
THE SIGN CENTER, INC.
ENGRAVERS
$155.00
$155.00
ROBERT SMITH
ADVANCE EXPENSES
$198.00
$198.00*
SPIAA 1991 CONFERENCE
REGISTRATION -DC DALEY
$150.00
$150.00
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
SUPPLIES
$391.00
$391.00
XL/DATACOMP INC.
MICE SERVICE APRIL
$62.10
$62.10
3M PWG1100 (RL)
SERVICE CALL
$188.50
$188.50
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$6,030.01
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE_ APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3128191
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $6,030.01
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
ARMSTRONG MEDICAL IND. INC.
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE,
COMPUTERLAND
THE CONFERENCE CORPORATION
CONNECT INC.
HENRY DAWSON
EDUCATION ALLIANCE
EHMAN, INC.
THE FITNESS WAREHOUSE
FORCE 4
GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION
H R HART PHOTO
HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY
IGE, INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS SECR.ASSN
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
INT'L. SOC. OF FIRE SERVICE IN
MTCE SUPPLIES
$27.80
MTCE SUPPLIES
$35.75
$63.55
LINEN SERVICE
$82.65
LINEN SERVICE
$137.63
LINEN SERVICE
$101.84
$322.12
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
$189.82
$189.82
SERVICE
$282.20
$282.20
REPAIR PARTS
$65.00
$65.00
EQUIPMENT
$2,508.00
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$181.00
$2,689.00
REGISTRATION -STEWARD
$270.00
$270.00
NETWORK CHGS
$6.86
$6.86
ADVANCE EXPENSES
$150.00
$150.00*
SUPPLIES
$80.00
SUPPLIES
$28.00
$108.00
EQUIPMENT
$979.00
$979.00
EQUIPMENT REPAIR
$171.00
$171.00
COMPUTER DISKETTES
$60.52
SUPPLIES
$173.13
$233.6'
BINDERS
$30.99
BINDERS
$100.00
$130.99
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$79.89
$79.89
PAINT SUPPLIES
$89.41
$89.41
CYLINDER RENTAL
$19.00
$19.00
SERVICE
$412.17
SERVICE
$22.90
SERVICE
$20.19
$455.26
REGISTER-HAJEK,CAVELLO
$50.00
$50.00
REGISTER -JACKSON, TRISTAN
$200.00
$200.00
REGISTRATION-DAWSON
$220.00
SUBSCRIPTION BILLING
$45.00
$265.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF F
REGISTRATION-CAVELLO
$150.00
$185.00
$150.00
$185.00
LONNIE JACKSON
ELAINE B. JEFFRESS
EXPENSES
SUPPLIES
$157.50
$157`50
KALE UNIFORMS
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$86.15
$178.66
$86.15
$178.66
KAR PRODUCTS INC
MICE SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.00
GARY KLEIN
MTCE SUPPLES$6
5.97
$65.97
LORI, BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIG
$50.00
$50.00
JOHN MALCOLM - F.D.
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
EXPENSES
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
$188.34
$188.34
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
RIBBONS
$322.20
$64.57
$322.20
$64.57
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
MURPHY'S CONTRACTORS EQUIPMENT
PARTS
PARTS
$106.75
$106.75
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
PARTS
$31.10
$6.20
PARTS
PARTS
$161.39
PARTS
$161.39 -
PARTS
$45.54
PARTS
$30.67
PARTS
$17.68
PARTS
$69.62
PARTS
$280.20
PARTS
$39.31
PARTS
$103.59
PARTS
$3.39
PARTS
$9.18
PARTS
52.92
PARTS
$11.43
$700.83
NORTHEAST ILL. EMERGENCY MGMT.
"OPERATION RESPONSE 91"
"OPERATION RESPONSE 91"
$205.00
$470.00
$675.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
AMBULANCE SUPPLIES
$31.40
$225.00
$31.40
$225.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
3 VISITS
$112.43
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$37.49
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$42.40
$192.32
PAGE AMERICA
SERVICE
$116.03
$116.03
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED -APRIL 91 $28,299.00 $28,299.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28%91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
PEARLE VISION CENTER #344
LENSES SCBA MASKS
$80.00
$80.00
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$33.00
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$4.45
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$3.19
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$8.39
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$27.48
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$18.00
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$9.00
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$20.83
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$30.94
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
$6.74
$162.02*
PLAZA TV INC.
SUPPLIES
$42.00
REPLACED PARTS
$109.00
$151.00
PROSPECT DIVE SHOP
LIBERATOR DIVE MASK
$45.56
$45.56
QUALEX, INC.
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$37.76
$37.76
SAFETY SUPPLY ILLINOIS
EQUIPMENT
$713.59
RESCUE EQUIPMENT
$79.60
$793.19
SCANNER WORLD, USA
EQUIPMENT
$80.99
$80.99
SCHWEPPE & SONS
SUPPLIES
$28.29
$28.29
SUBURBAN GAS SALES
OXYGEN
$60.00
$60.00
MARIO TRISTAN
EXPENSES
$185.00
$185.00
TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN.
MICE SUPPLIES
$26.82
$26.82
DEL ULREICH
ADVANCE EXPENSES
$350.00
$350.00*
RAYMOND YOUNG
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.0
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
***TOTAL**
$12,613.75
GENERAL FUND
$11,694.01 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
$919.74
********************************************************************************************************
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED -APRIL 91 $28,299.00 $28,299.00
GENERAL FUND $1,411.84
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION DUES & JOURNAL $117.00 $117.00
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO BOXWOOD SUMMER PROGRAM $5,870.00 $5,870.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
***TOTAL**
$28,299.00
GENERAL FUND
$28,299.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$485.45
$485.45
ARA/CORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
COFFEE
$138.00
$75.00
$213.00
DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C
COFFEE
TONER
$56.00
$264.00
$320.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
TONER
SERVICE
$38.24
$44.00
$38.24
$44.00
INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL RESOURCE
REGISTRATION FLOREY
$46.56
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$22.24
$68.80
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$11.00
$69.85
$80.85*
PIP PRINTING
MISC EXPENSES
STATIONERY
$66.50
$95.00
$66.50
$95.00
STATE OF ILLINOIS CONTINUITY
REGISTRATION-FLOREY
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$1,411.81
GENERAL FUND $1,411.84
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION DUES & JOURNAL $117.00 $117.00
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO BOXWOOD SUMMER PROGRAM $5,870.00 $5,870.00
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$271.30
$34.40
PAGE 13
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$841.20
$841.2
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
$84.00
$121.89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
SUPPLIES
$77.26
$5.98
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
EXTRA TABLE CONSUMER EXPO
$10.00
$10.00
NCRC/NAHRO
REGISTRATION -SIMS
$185.00
$185.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$405.50
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$60.22
$465.72
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$15.00
$43.50
MISC EXPENSES
$13.86
MISC EXPENSES
$11.22
$40.08*
QUALEX, INC.
FILM & PHOTO PROCESSING
FILM & PHOTO PROCESSING
$7.23
$3.87
$11.10
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,250.00
$1,250.00
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$7,948.90
GENERAL FUND
$643.90 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$7,305.00
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
AIRFARE -BOTH
$271.30
$34.40
$271.30
$34.4
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
SERVICES RENDERED
$841.20
$841.2
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
SERVICE CALL
$84.00
$121.89
SERVICE CALL
KEYS
$17.80
$223.69
GW BERKHEIMER CO., INC.
SUPPLIES
$77.26
$5.98
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$33.38-
$49.86
DAVID BOESCHE
REIMS -SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$94.00
$50.00
$94.00
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
BUSSE HARDWARE
REPAIR DOOR
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES
$10.23
MISC HARDWARE SUPPLIES
$27.73
$37.96
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
FLOWERS
$43.50
$43.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
STREET DIVISION
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
SERVICE
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CLNG SUPPLIES
$70.86
CLNG SUPPLIES
$43.55
CLNG SUPPLIES
CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION
EQUIP PARTS
$60.30
EQUIP PARTS
COMMODORE MAINTENANCESYSTEMSCLNG
SERVICE
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BF80-JT-17006
COURTESY HOME CENTER
LIES
TRAINING
DOUGLAS TV
EQUIPMENT
$6.98
TRAINING EQUIPMENT
DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS, IN
MOTOR
$246.00
SUPPLIES
$44.08
SUPPLIES
G & K SERVICES, INC.
UNIFORM SVC
$46.95
UNIFORM SERVICE
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
MTCE CONTRACT
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.
SUPPLIES
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MTG SUPPLIES-TRNG
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRRAAVEL
$12.04
& SUPPLIES
$2.13
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$1.75
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$54.83
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$14.17
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$40.00
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
MAR 91 PEST CONTROL
$5.25
MAR 91 PEST CONTROL
$60.00
MAR 91 PEST CONTROL
$60.00
MAR 91 PEST CONTROL
TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, L
SERVICES RENDERED
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
101 S MAPLE ST
VULCAN SIGN
SUPPLIES
WEBB PLASTICS, INC.
SUPPLIES
PAGE 14
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$70.86
$70.86
$43.55
$92.00
$60.30
$195.85
$29.77
$616.31
$646.08
$2,076.00
$2,076.00
$183.44"
$183.44
$6.98
$6.98
$170.00
$246.00
$416.00
$44.08
$14.60
$46.95
$105.63
$354.93
$157.05
$511.98
$12,826.00
$12,826.00
$825.00
$825.00
$690.00
90.00
$6$9.24.
59.24
$12.04
$12.04*
$2.13
$1.75
$54.83
$14.17
$40.00
$9.96
$5.25
$128.09*
$60.00
$60.00
$60.00
$60.00
$240.00
$8,500.00
$8,500.00
$2.50
$2.50
$1,390.00
$1,390.00
$91.30
$91.30
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$16,905.70 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$12,826.00
PAGE 15
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
***TOTAL** $30,572.90
$841.20
tttttttttttttttttttttttttttt,itttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt*ttt*ttttt*tttttttttt*tttttt***tttttt*tttt*tt
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BADGER METER INC
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
E & H UTILITY'SALES
E & H UTILITY SALES, INC -
FLOW -TECHNICS
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
G & K SERVICES, JNC.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION
SERVICES RENDERED
$62.60
$62.60
REPLACEMENT METER
$1,852.22
METERS
$2,961.36
$4,813.58
CLNG SUPPLIES
$280.28
CLNG SUPPLIES
$172.74
$453.02
BJ80-JT-23598
$5,829.99
$5,829.99
BH67-JT-1310-A
$42.58
BB72-JT-5608-D
$85.54
$128.12
MICE SUPPLIES
$145.64
$145.64
MICE SUPPLIES
$131.07
$131.07
EQUIPMENT
$2,126.00
$2,126.00
FIRE EXTINGUISHER SERVICE
$20.00
$20.00
UNIFORM SVC
$354.92
$511.9,
UNIFORM SERVICE
$157.05
SERVICE
$31.05
SERVICE
$37.04
SERVICE
$18.28
SERVICE
$16.98
SERVICE
$23.70
SERVICE
$18.31
SERVICE
$18.69
$164.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$83.70
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$104.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$8.32
$196.07
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,347.00
$1,347.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
MTCE CONTRACT
$825.00
$825.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1818 1/2 BONITA
$232.21
$144.24
117 N WAVERLY
NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND
$103.67
112 E HIGHLAND-EMMERSON
$213.12
$693.24
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$47.62
$179.84
OFFICE.. SUPPLIES
OFFICE.SUPPLiES
$6.08
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$28.08
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$11.14
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$182.54
$455.30
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICE
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
$120.00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$46.84
$2.94
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$54-00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$27.91
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$4.79
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$95.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$27.92
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$10.69
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$29.00
'
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$75.00
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$15.78
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$9.04
TRAVEL & EXPENSES
$64.47
$463.38*
POSTMASTER
POSTATE FOR WATER BILLS
$592.72
$592.72*
SOFTWAREHOUSE-CHICAGO
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$57.99
$305.86
$363.85
STEVE AND SONS
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
DOORS BOOSTER STATION #11
$2,262.46
$2,262.46
$12.12
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
OXYGEN CYLINDER
$105.03
$
TIME MARK CORPORATION
MTCE SUPPLIES
tttttttt*tttttttttttttttttttt*ttttttt**ttttt*ttttttttt*ttt,rtt*tt*,rtt***tt*t*tttt******#tt*:t***t:tt*t*t*
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A $20.35
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
BH66-JT-3710-A
BH66-JT-5262-A
BH66-JT-5266-C
BH68-JT-7498-A
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
$363.12
$8.29
$175.91
$133.22
$20.35 $358.12
$5.00 $5.00
***TOTAL** $363.12
t**tttttttttttt*tt,t*ttttt*tttttttttttttt*tttt,rtatttttttttttt*tttt***ttt*ttst***t******t*ttt*trrt*ttttttt*
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHARGE $8,091.00 $8,091.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $8,091.00
e
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
2IEBELL WATER SERVICR pfQ@
HYDRANTS W/AUX.VALVE
$1,703.90
$1,703.90
3M PWG1100 (RL)
SUPPLIES
$156.60
$1 56.60
WATER AND SEWER DIVISI€N
***TOTAL**
$23,682.71
WATER 6 SEWER FUND
$23,682.71
tttttttt*tttttttttttttttttttt*ttttttt**ttttt*ttttttttt*ttt,rtt*tt*,rtt***tt*t*tttt******#tt*:t***t:tt*t*t*
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A $20.35
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
BH66-JT-3710-A
BH66-JT-5262-A
BH66-JT-5266-C
BH68-JT-7498-A
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
$363.12
$8.29
$175.91
$133.22
$20.35 $358.12
$5.00 $5.00
***TOTAL** $363.12
t**tttttttttttt*tt,t*ttttt*tttttttttttttt*tttt,rtatttttttttttt*tttt***ttt*ttst***t******t*ttt*trrt*ttttttt*
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHARGE $8,091.00 $8,091.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $8,091.00
e
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/28/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $8,091.00
*************************************************k*******************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
INSTALL SECURITY SYSTEM
$91.17
$769.47
$860.64
BI3RKE AND RYAN
INSTALL SECURITY SYSTEM
LEGAT,...,S RV2CE5=FEB
_ $531.25
- $53-1. 5 -
CARPETS BY RAY & SONS
BLDG IMPROVEMENTS
BLDG IMPROVEMENTS
$3,798.75
$1,266.25
$5,065.00
DECKER AND KEMP
SERVICES RENDERED
$6,077.22
$3,500.00
$6,077.22
$3,500.00
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,005.76
$1,005.76
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
MILES CHEVROLET, INC.
SERVICE
PURCHASE POLICE VEHICLES
953.04
PURCHASE POLICE VEHICLES
$12,250.86
$49,203.90*
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$66,243.77
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND
$12,250.86 CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT FUND
$53,461.66
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
$531.25
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
BG21-JT-1838-A
BH67-JT-3858-B
$63.07
$52.37
$10.70 $63,07
***TOTAL** $63.07
$810,338.23
DATE RUN 3/28/91
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1.9
TIME RUN 11.56.41
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 3/28/91
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$473,082.05
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$841.20
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$8,592.38
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$11,176.64
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$62,171.10
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,299.88
48
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND
$12,250.86
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$76,003.45
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$67,207.40
55
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
$531.25
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$40,732.07
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$42,337.70
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$14,112.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $810,338.23
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS;
S,ECT`lON ONE: That Subsection C. of Section 13.114 of Chapter 13 of the Village of
Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, be deleted in its entirety and a new paragraph
C of Section 13.114 inserted in lieu thereof; so that hereinafter said Section 13.114 C.,
shall be and read as follows:
"C. Notwithstanding any provision of this Chapter 13 to the contrary, it shall
be unlawful for a Class C licensee who sells alcoholic liquor as a part of,
but not as, its principal business and whose business premises exceed five
thousand (5,000) square feet, to consummate the sale of alcoholic liquor
except at a counter with a cash register designated to be used for the sale
of alcoholic liquor and which cash register is operated by a person of at
least nineteen (19) years of age. No more than two (2) cash registers may
be designated for the sale of alcoholic beverages and to the extent
practicable shall be separated from the remaining cash registers and check-
out lines in the establishment. 11
SE�RQN TwQ, That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of , 1991
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
I
Village President
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLF-Y AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 27, 1991
SUBJECT: NEW MANAGEMENT AT OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB
RESTAURANT
I had a conversation with Mr. Steve Blamak, who represents the ownership of the Old
Orchard Country Club. While the ownership of the Old Orchard Country Club has not
changed, the ownership has decided to take back from the individual who leased the
restaurant business from them that operation so that they can bring it up to the quality
and the standards which they feel is necessary to make a going concern at the restaurant.
Mr. David Geick, who has had liquor licenses in other communities and also has had
extensive experience in operating restaurant operations in other communities, will be the
operator of the restaurant at Old Orchard.
They do not anticipate changing any of the hours or service except for the upgrading and
quality. The names of the corporate officers remain the same. The only item that we
will be agreeing to is changing the operator on the License.
JOHN�FULTON �DIN
JFD/rcw
attachment
Y_L1J,_AGE OF MOUNT PROQZPEC
-1 C-QQK CQ -
LOCAL LIQUOR CONM-QL COMML55M
APPLICAMN EOR REIAIL LIQUQR DEALER'S LICENSE
RENEWAL DATE March 22, 1991
NEW(�150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuanceofnew Liquor
License; one-time only fee)
Honorable Gerald L Farley, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as
Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of
January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount
Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois:
The undersigned, OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB, INC.
hereby makes application for a Class s liquor dealer's license for the period ending
April 30, 19 91 , and tenders the sumof$208.00 the prescribed
fee as set forth in the following:
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106):
Annu&l ftg
CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00
CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00
CLASS C: Retail package only 2,000.00
CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00
CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000.00
CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine;
limited number of special events to include
full service bar facilities; consumption on
premises only 00.00
CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00
CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00
CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non -
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises 1,750.00
CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,00000
CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge 2,500.00
CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00
CLASS V: Restail package - wine only 1,500.00
CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only
and at dining tables only 1,000.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL.
Your petitioner, OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB, INC. doing business
as --,OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB RESTAURANT respectfully requests
permission to operate a retail liquor business at 700 WEST RAND ROAQ
, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Description and name of premises: one story brick and glass at Old Orchard
Country Club approx. 25,880 S.F.
must be complete as to floor area,
Is applicant owner of premises: YES
If not owner, does applicant have a lease? State date applicant's lease expires:
If not ownex, attach copy of lease hereto.
Does applicant have a mar
operation or management of
If so, state the name and ad
David W. Geick, 0 N 660 Pri
same amication as
Is applicant an
If an individual, state your
Security Number:
.lent contract with another person or entity for the
licensed premises? _YES
of the manager or management company.
rte manager or management company must
a co -partnership or an association? (Circle one)
date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof:
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: IL 05-04-1955
If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date
qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois:
If a corporation, give names,
Security Numbers of Officers
birth and Social Security Nur
51,7c of the stock of such cora
MW
Glenn Steinberg
Date of Birth: 03-09-41
U912—aLitnall—
Date of Birth: 04-27-20
dresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social
d Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of
rs of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than
Security #331-34-3356
Security # 324-18-7449
OFFICE AND/OR
PERCENT OF
STOCK HELD
President 0/1.
Phone #255-2025
0 Vice -President - 0%
Phone # 255-2025
Muriel Newman,
_179 E. Lake Shore Dr. Chicaa�g60611 Sec/Treas. - 33 1/39%
Date of Birth: 02-25-14 Social Security # 323-40-3464 — Phone # 255-2025
(Additinnni infnrmptinn to h.- inrhiripei nn n cpn-Arnt,- Hetina 1
Objects for which orgar, tion is formed: Golf Coggse. ges Zaat,
_1QUnQ2
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or
any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been
convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? Nc If so, explain:
If applicant is an individual, state age: Marital status:
Is applicant a citizen of the United States?- yES If a naturalized, citizen, state date and
place of naturalization:
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to
the filing of this application?
Local address: Telephone no.
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore:
Golf Country Club Restaurant and Lounge
State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time:
A
How long has applicant been in this business?36 years_,
Is the applicant an elected public official?.. No If so, state the particulars thereof:
Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public
official? No
In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any
political contributions within the past 2 years? No
If so, state the particulars thereof:
Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? ..No If so, designate title:
Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp?
NO If so, state the reasons therefor -
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of
subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of
the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter -amended? No If so, liMt
date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premie,',
other than described in this application? No If so, state disposition of such
application:
Is applicant qualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor
business? YES Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal
government or by any state or subdivision thereof? No If so, explain:
Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed
by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? NO
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United
States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the
conduct of his/her place of business? YES
Does applicant currently c
copy.
If applicant is not the owner
Insurance coverage?
no license shall issue—.)
Does Surety Bond required
filing? _ys
Shop Insurance coverage" Is If "Yes," attach
the premises,
s, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop
,he answer to either of the foregoing questions is "No,"
Ordinance accompany this application at the time of
State name and address of each surety next below:
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of
manager or agent in charge of Oremises for which this application is made:
David W. Geick, 0 n 660 Prin6e Crossincr Road, West Chicago, IL 6Q185
Born 09/11/36, Phone #708-23 -9296 R..q.,+4R4-14-AAM
v
ATURE OF APPLICANT_ ALL
t \k
Corporate Seal
(If applicant is corporation)
Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that he is/are the
applicant(s) for the license requested in the foregoing application; that he is/are of
good repute, character and st a0ding and that answers to the questions asked in the
foregoing application are true and correct in every detail.
STATE OF ILLINOIS
COUNTY OF COOK
Subscribed and Sworn to be
OFFICIAL SEAL
JOHN
ULO
JOMN PETROPOULOS
T�
N TA Y t UeLfC
OTHY toeLtC, STATE Of ILLINOIS
C�j
COWSSO i S
MSSO�
',E 12/94
N EXPIR,,. S5/
MYN o —A � 1.
APPLICATION APPROVED;
6M!
me this 7 1— day ofWe Ove-- 'A.D., 19 %>
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount" Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 11, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-9-V-91, TIMOTHY BROWN
LOCATION: 1625 EAST DOGWOOD LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Timothy Brown. Mr. Brown is requesting the following
variations from Section 14.102.13 pertaining to accessory buildings:
1. To allow two accessory buildings on one lot, being an existing storage shed and the
recently constructed playhouse.
2. To allow a height of 13 feet for a playhouse rather than the 10 ft. permitted.
3. To allow an 18" sideyard for a storage shed rather than 5 ft., to allow the relocation
of an existing storage shed.
4. To allow I foot separation between the principal structure and a storage shed rather
than 10 ft., with the relocated shed.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 199 L
At the meeting, Mr. Brown presented testimony in support of the request. He explained
that he constructed a playhouse on top of a six foot tall platform which raised the overall
structure height to 13 feet. He also stated that he would like to relocate an existing storage
shed to the east side of his house. In that location, the shed would be 18" from the lot line
and 1 foot from his home. He stated that a fence and existing landscaping would screen
the shed from the street.
Phil Krawiek, 1627 East Dogwood, expressed concerns about the height of the playhouse.
Mr. Krawiek lives next door to Mr. Brown and the playhouse is visible over the fence. Mr.
Krawiek was concerned with the safety of the structure and it's untidy appearance,
Mr. Brown responded to these concerns stating that the playhouse is not complete. '17he
windows and roof will be properly finished this spring and summer. He also indicated that
the playhouse platform was very sturdy and that a security railing was installed around the
top.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
March 11, 1991
Julie Farnham, Planner, pre
Zoning Ordinance does not
therefore be considered like
Ms. Farnham stated that staff
existing shed. The requested
Staff believes that if the shed
variation.
I staff concerns with the request. She noted that the
specific standards for playhouse structures which must
J storage sheds.
s some major concerns with the proposed relocation of the
eyard and separation from the house are severe variations.
relocated, it should be to a location that does not require
The Zoning Board discussed the variations. Questions were raised about the possibility of
lowering the playhouse, and thcondition of the existing shed. The Zoning Board noted
e
that landscaping on the neighboes lot would screen the shed. The Zoning Board of Appeals
considered the variations to Section 14.102.B separately as follows:
1. The variance request to
a tie, 3-3 vote.
2. By a vote of 6-0, recom
3. By a vote of 5-1 recomi
an existing shed as p
landscaping to be instal
4. By a vote of 5-1, recom
structure and a storage
DMC:hg
a 13 foot tall accessory building (playhouse) received
approval of two accessory buildings on one lot.
Js approval of an 18" sideyard to allow the relocation of
used on the submitted site plan and conditioned on
a shown on the site plan.
; approval of a 1 foot separation between the principal
as indicated on the submitted site plan.
E
I I,,-; �' I
Two T
ROM
'8 CEk IN C
D
Dori woo D.
i. 1tl fM rIY r •
•
.M.
I
H
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO, 9-\'-91
Hearing Date: February 28, 1991,
PETITIONER:
Timothy Brown
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1.625 Dogwood
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 12, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section 14.102.2
to accommodate accessory
buildings. To allow a 13'
height in lieu of 10'. To allow
two accessory buildings on one
lot. to allow a 18" sideyard in
lieu of 5'. To allow V
separation from the principal
structure in lieu of 10'.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT:
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED
PARTIES: Phil. Krawiek, 1627 Dogwood
Chairman Basnik introduced
this case stating the petitioner
is requesting variations
from Section 14.102.B to accommodate
accessory buildings.
To allow a 13' height in lieu of 10'. To
allow two accessory
buildings or one lot. To allow a 18"
sideyard in lieu of
5'. To allo« 1' separation from the
principal structure
in lieu of 10'.
The petitioner, Timothy Brown of 1925 Dogwood, presented his
case stating that he had constr,t('-(i a playhouse and obtainc-i
a permit from the Village. Mr. IR--;-)wn stated that the
playhouse will be removed when Lis children outgrow using it.
.r. Brown also stated that the request for the sideyard
variation is for an existing shed that he would like to
relocate to his sideyard to have more room in his rear yard.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the tillage of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitioners request is to accommodate two
accessory buildings, a storage shed and a playhouse. Miss
Farnham stated that the playhouse is on a 6' platform
resulting in the overall 13' height. She also stated that
playhouse is partially A by trees, but is visible over fences.
screev\m
Miss Farnham state
safety railings be
platform. She stat
to relocating the '-
and separation var
believes that if t
location that does
Phil Krawiek of 16
variation requests
without approval a
since July 1990. M
about the safety o
conforming and wel
Mr. Brown stated t
railing has been i
permitted by Code.
Mr. Brown then pr
rear yard in the w
Mrs. Skowron quest
knowing about the
petitioner did not
he obtained the pe
structures do not
must submit a sket
location on the to
The Board then ge
Basnik questioned
petitioner stated
structure to do t
Chairman Basnik th
petitioners reques
of 10' feet.
Mr. Lannon moved.
UPON ROLL CALL:
Motion resulted
Chairman Basnik th
petitioners reques
lot.
ZBA-9-V-91
February 28, 1991
Page 2 of 3
at approval 4 should be condition on
Put around the top cf the playhouse
hat, staff has some concerns with regard
ting storage shed. The sideyard setback
es requested are extreme. Staff
hed is to be moved it should be to
require variances.
ogwood, stated that he opposes the
ting that the structures were completed
e has been complaining to the Village
rawiek also stated that he is concerned
e structure and feels itis non-
er 120 square feet.
the structure is safe and the safety
lled. It -is 98 sq. ft., which is
the summer it is screened by the trees.
ted a picture of the playhouse from his
r season without leaves on the trees.
d how a permit was issued without
age shed? Mr. Clements stated that the
icate the shed on the application when
. Permits for relatively minor
ire a survey. However the applicant
f the proposed structure and its
ly discussed the proposal. Chairman
he platform could be lowered by 3'. The
he would have to demolish the entire
ntertained a motion to grant the
allow a 13' height structure in lieu
Pratt seconded.
Lannon, Pratt, Brothers
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
ote of 3-3.
ntertained a motion to grant the
o allow two,accessory buildings on one
ZDA-9-V-91
February 28, 1991
Page 3 of 3
Mr. Lannon moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to allow a 18" sideyard in lieu of 5'
to relocate a storage shed as shown on submitted site plan.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mrs. Brothers seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron,
Basnik
NAYS: Brothers
Motion carried by a vote of 5-1.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to allow a I foot separation from the
principal structure in lieu of 10', with a condition of
shrubbery to screen it visually from the street.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron,
Basnik
NAYS: Brothers
Motion carried by a vote of 5-1.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Pt-6spect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
FEBRUARY 15, 1991
ZBA-9-V-91
TIMOTHY BROWN
1625 EAST DOGWOOD LANE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LOT SIZE: 751 X 1201 = 9,000 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 36.3%
F.A.R. : N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board'of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is seeking the
accessory buildings:
To allow a 13 foot
2. To allow two accessory
3. To allow a 18" sideyard
4. To allow 1 foot
Summary of application: m
constructed on a platform in
considered an accessory bu
standards for typical storage
The applicant obtained a
on top of a six foot high p
Ordinance permits a max
Concurrently, the applicant is 9
the house. In this location, tho
lot line.
Surrounding Area Developme
on this lot. One is a typical l
accessory building, in additic
typical storage shed, but it is.
designed for sheds. The app
when the children grow out
second accessory building on
variations to Section 14.102.13 to accommodate
in lieu of 10 feet.
on one lot.
lieu of 5 feet.
from the principal structure in lieu of 10 feet.
applicant is seeking a height variation for a playhouse
rear yard of 1625 East Dogwood Lane. The playhouse is
g and must therefore be constructed according to the
t for the playhouse. However, because it was constructed
4 the overall height of the structure is 13 feet. The Zoning
height of 10 feet.
ing to relocate an existing shed to the sideyard east of
would be 1 foot from the house and 18" from the east
and Potential Impact: There are two accessory structures
x 12' storage shed and the other is a playhouse. Only one
to a garage, is allowed on a lot. The playhouse is not a
accessory structure and therefore, must meet the standards
tent states that the playhouse will be removed in 5-7 years
it. Staff has no objections to allowing the playhouse as a
is lot.
The applicant states that the pyhouse was constructed on top of the platform to allow free
space for ground play undern ,ath. Staff has no major objections to the playhouse on the
platform but notes that it is v 'le from adjacent properties over the top of fences. Mature
trees screen it from some vantage points. Staff does suggest that security railing be installed
around the above -grade platfOinn area.
Staff has some concerns abo t the proposal to relocate .the existing storage shed to the
sideyard. While Mr. Brown indicates that landscaping and a fence will be provided in front
of the shed, it will be closer toi and therefore more visible from the street. Staff notes that
there are no widows on theound floors of the homes adjacent to the proposed shed
location. There are also ma a evergreen trees on the neighbors property which would
effectively screen the shed from the adjacent neighbor. In the proposed location the shed
would be 14 feet from the nehbor's house.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals, Page 3
Another concern with the proposed relocation is that it essentially blocks access to the rear
yard from the east side of the house. It would be impossible for emergency equipment to
utilize this sideyard without removing the shed. While emergency access to the rear yard
could be obtained through the west side yard, staff cannot support blocking any potential
emergency access routes so severely.
Staff notes that the current location of the shed also reduces access to the rear yard.
However, the proposed location would increase the degree of non -conformity. Staff suggests
that if the shed is relocated at all, it should be moved to a location that does not require
variances.
.J.LLAGE UAEE COMhZN
The Inspection Services Department requires that sheds be fireproofed with 5/8" Class X
drywall where located less than 10 feet from the principal structure. Engineering notes that,
if the shed is relocated to the sideyard, the downspouts should be redirected toward the
front or back yard.
SUOMMARYIRECOMMENDA33ON
Staff has no objection to allowing the playhouse as a second accessory building on this lot.
The playhouse is not a typical accessory building and staff has no objection to the height
variance requested, provided proper security railing is installed around the top of the
elevated platform. The location of the playhouse meets all setback requirements and lot
coverage is below the maximum allowed.
Staff does not support the setback variances created by relocating the storage shed to the
east sideyard. The variances are extreme (70% sideyard; , 90% separation) and could
negatively effect emergency access around the house. Staff suggests that if the shed is
moved at all, it should decrease, not increase its existing non -conforming status.
DMC:hg
CAF
3/28/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1625 EAST DOGWOOD LANE
WHEREAS, Timothy Brown (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
1625 East Dogwood Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 912 in Brickman Manor First Addition - Unit 8, being a
subdivision in the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section
26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, Cook County, Illinois;
M-91
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.102.B to
permit two accessory buildings on one lot, specifically a shed and
playhouse; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 9-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
February, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of February, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject'of ZBA 9-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102.B to allow two accessory buildings (shed and
playhouse) on one lot, provided that the playhouse be reduced in
height.to the maximum height permitted of 10 feet.
SECTION THREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FOUR, This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
D
ZBA 9-V-91
Page 2 of 2
and after its passage
in the manner providec
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED tJ
Carol A. Field
Village Clerk
approval and publication in pamphlet form
by lana.
d,� y
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount.Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 11, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-10-V-91, PATRICIA LANGOS
LOCATION: 1715 ROBBIE LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for
a variance application filed by Patricia Langos. The applicant is requesting a variance to
Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a driveway width of 28'-10" to accommodate an adjacent patio
at 1715 Robbie Lane.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991.
At the meeting, Larry Ellington, representing the petitioner, explained that the existing
driveway and patio were replaced. A permit was received for the driveway but the property
owner didn't know that the adjacent patio was considered part of the driveway. The
variance is requested to allow the driveway and patio to remain as reconstructed.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks and patios
adjacent to driveways to be included in the overall driveway width. She noted that the
driveway and patio were reconstructed the same size as previously existed and that lot
coverage would not be increased. She also stated that the lot coverage is currently at the
allowed maximum and any additional structures placed on the lot would need a variance.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board
recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 28'-10" wide driveway which
includes an adjacent patio at 1715 Robbie Lane conditioned on:
-No additional structures shall be built on this lot.
DMC:hg
Y
CC`
r„y
�
5
t
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 10-V-91 Hearing Date: February 28, 1991
PETITIONER: Patricia Langos
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1715 Robbie Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: Febrtiarl-• 12, 1991
REQUEST: Variation from Section
11.3016,A.3 to allow a drive
widtfa of 28'-10" at j.ts widest
p(-) �
i,nt .
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: l b,ert Basn-".k, Chairman
Peter Lannon
R, ; r h ard Pratt
L()is Brothers
R,.-,Iher�- Br(--ttrager
Mieha�..,I.e Skowron
ABSENT: Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this -ase stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.
3016.A.3 to allow a driveway Width of 28'-10" at its widest
point. A maximum driveway width of 21' is permitted by Codf-.
The petitioner, Larry Ellington .)' 605 S. Roosevelt,
Arlington Heights, IL, the nephp,� (,f the petitioner, stated
that his aunt received a permit to reconstruct the drivel -:al
and reconstructed the patio alq,) b:it didn't realize the pat:
had to be included. Mr. Ellingt;ri �-tatpd that his aunt
replaced exactly what was ther— ''--P re.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the of Mount Prospect,
stated that the total driveway- dth comes to 28'-10" which
includes the patio. Miss Farnh:ir stated that they
reconstructed exactly what was them before, noting that
lot coverage is notbeing incre-is;-(i. In addition, there is -i
5-7 foot green strip to capturf, any run-off and a fence t -
screen the patio from the neigh1r)—r.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a variation from Section 14.3016.\.,
to allow a driveway width of 28'-10" at its widest point.
Mrs. Brothers moved. Mrs. skot;:,,:n ;Prorided.
UPON ROLL CALL: V
N
Mntion carried by
Tbis c,3Lse must st�
qLnn,on, Prett,,
koi4,,,rd,n,l Basnik
;n f6�0-
he,", ra before
%q 4 -u- I I.
1991
10
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNNG AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ff-
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
FEBRUARY 15, 1991
ZBA-10-V-91
PATRICIA LANGOS
1715 ROBBIE LANE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
LOT SIZE: 751 x 1331-9k" = 10,034.25 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 44.9%
F.A-R.: N.A.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUE
The applicant is requesting a variance to Section 14,3016.A-3 to allow a driveway width of
28'-10" at it's widest point. A,'mumdriveway width of 21 feet is permitted by Code.
Summary of application: Thi- applicant obtained a permit to reconstruct a 21 foot wide
driveway. An existing adjacent patio was also reconstructed at that time which, according
to the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance, must be included in the overall width of the
driveway.
The applicant was not aware of this requirement and therefore, did not indicate the patio
reconstruction on the driveway permit. The variance is requested to allow the driveway and
patio to remain as reconstructed.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant states that the original
driveway and patio had become cracked and sunk toward the house foundation causing
drainage problems. The driveway and patio were reconstructed the same size as previously
existed. While lot coverage is not being increased, at 44.9% it is essentially at the maximum
coverage allowed by Code. A's such, any additional structures or pavement placed on this
lot would require a variance do the lot coverage requirements.
The applicant's detached
driveway flares out behind
the neighborhood with situ
The area between the drive
leading to a door beside the
and sidewalks adjacent to d
they could be used for parki
the house, it would be diffic,
driveway.
A landscaped area 5-7 feet
east. This should provide E
foot wood fence exists along
garage. The fence effecti,
property.
No major objections were
reconstruction has not cai
is located partially behind the house. As a result, the
ise to meet the garage. Staff observed several homes in
,-ed driveways.
y and the house was paved to create a patio and sidewalk
erhead garage door. The Zoning Ordinance requires patios
.ways to be included in the overall driveway width because
In this situation, because of the position of the patio behind
to park a full-sized vehicle on the patio without blocking the
exists between the driveway and the adjacent lot to the
drainage area for any run-off from the driveway. A 4-5
lot line, extending from the front building line back to the
screens the driveway and patio area from the adjacent
I by other Village staff. Engineering notes that the driveway
any drainage problems.
Oil" 4 0 4
NOW
welt
DMC:hg
CAF/
3/21/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
CONLY KNOWN AS 1715 ROBBIE LANE
WHEREAS, Patricia J. Langos (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 1715 Robbie Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property), legally described as:
Lot 14 in Colonial Heights Fifth Addition, a subdivision
of part of Lots 2 and 3 in owner's Division, a Subdivision
of the Southeast Quarter (except the West Half of the
Southwest Quarter thereof) of Section 10, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal meridian in
Cook County, Illinois, according to Plat of said Colonial
Heights Fifth Addition registered in the office of the
Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on March 15,
1963 as Document Number 2081725
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to
allow a driveway twenty-eight feet ten inches (281 1011) at the
widest point to accommodate an adjacent patio; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 10-V-91 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
February, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the -Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of February, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 10-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.3016.A.3 to permit a driveway width of twenty-eight
feet ten inches (281 1011) to accommodate an adjacent patio.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the village Code, the variations granted herein
w1rde'l
WAWA
W
ZBA 10-V-91
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and voia'unless permits are issued and construction
begins' within one (1� year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
I'
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fiel
Village Clerk
! _ day of
IMMIM165%
kvff* w IN Le UM a W;T-y wo 174 it
,1991.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 11, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-6.7,91, ZBA-11-V.91, GLADSTONE NORWOOD TRUST
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE/DEVELOPMENT CODE
MODIFICATION
LOCATION: 412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a rezoning and variation request filed by Gladstone Norwood Trust (Vince Manglardi -
beneficiary). The applicant is requesting:
1. Rezoning of 412 and 414 East Rand Road from R-1 Single Family Residence to B-
2 Business Office to allow construction of an office building.
2. Variation to Section 14.3012.13 to waive the one required 12' x 35' loading space.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991.
At the meeting, Mr. Manglardi explained that he is proposing to construct a two-story office
building on the property. Likely tenants would include real estate related businesses such
as, realtors, surveyors, and lawyers offices.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the proposed B-2 zoning
is quite restrictive, essentially allowing only office uses. The adjacent funeral home to the
north is also zoned B-2 so a larger, unified zoning district would be created by the proposed
rezoning. He also indicated that B-2 zoning would be more desirable than higher intensity,
commercial/retail uses adjacent to residential development. He further noted that the Plan
Commission recently approved the subdivision and ,a change in the Comprehensive Plan
from Single Family Residential to General Commercial -Office. The Plan Commission also
approved a Development Code modification to defer street light installation by requiring
a restrictive covenant.
Mr. Clements noted that the site plan is conceptual but demonstrates that an office building
and required parking can be developed without variations. Landscaping and berming will
be provided to screen the development from the residences. Specific detail design of the
building and storm water management would be required for the permit review process.
Mr. Clements stated that staff supports B-2 zoning for this property and has no objection
to waiving the loading space requirement.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
March 11, 1991
Marcia Kurchodina, 518 East iil Street, discussed several concerns raised by neighborhood
residents and listed on a handout While they were not opposed to B-2 zoning in general,
they were concerned about i�creased traffic in the neighborhood and other potential
environment issues, such as, floi g, aesthetics and noise. She presented an alternative site
plan illustrating the driveway rning directly onto Rand Road rather than on Hill Street.
Jim Bushemi, 504 Eastman Court, expressed similar concerns noting that the landscaped
berm between the development and the residents is very important to ensure aesthetic
quality. He also stated that hbelieves the main objection to the proposed plan is having
the -driveway off Hill Street.
John Dourghty, 520 Hill Street, also expressed concerns about traffic congestion during rush
hour if the driveway opens onto Hill Street.
Bill Kurchodina, 518 East Hill Street, summarized that they were not opposed to an office
development but were concerned about safety.
The Zoning Board discussed 'he request and the alternative site plan presented by the
neighbors. They questioned w;ether I.D.O.T. would approve another opening onto Rand
Road. Some general discus i � ensued about the loading space variation request.
s17
After further discussion, the ning Board of Appeals voted 6-0 to approve the rezonirg
of 412 and 414 East Rand R Z11 from R-1 Single Family Residence to B-2 Business Office.
By a separate vote of 5-1, the 2bning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a variance
to Section 14.3012.8 to waive the required loading space.
MEW,
SHADE TREES
40' ON CENTER
EVERGREEN, HEDGING A
GROUND COVER—FOUNDATION
PLANTING AROUND BUILDING
\\ 236.02'
XI I� SOD '� z
e SOD
., j -,--PROPOSED
2 STORY
BRICK OFFICE
BUILDING _N
NOTE 14,500 TOTA
FINAL PLANTING:' SQ. FT.'
SELECTION BY ;�°"
LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTNx
1, a�
SHADE TREES TO BE ` 1
21/2" MIN. CALIPER.
l I� bu• = X12 �`��>� t �
A( roo
�r l sus rh
c.
SOD—
h . Le-,
— ORNAMENTAL TREE
SURROUNDED BY
CLUSTER OF SHRUBS
TYPICAL FOR II
65.00' 65.00'
p
I — SH ADE TREES
✓
WITH ORNAMEN-
T
SHRUBS—=`
PROPOSED ASPHALT
PARKING LOT
21,525 SQ. FT.
(§ EE ATTACHED PLAN)
�
`
� f
UD
37' 7
01.
-
65Oi}' 65 -Op SOD
PROPOSED DRIVE
HILL STREET
SHADE TREES AND HEDGES
SITE PLAN
PROPOSED OFFICE BLDG. N
SCALE! *50'-0"
tot' YIn' CONCRETE
PARKING LOT PLAN
SCALE- i"■ 3C' -O"— & I I
AIL
�/
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO.
6-Z-91
Hearing Date: February 28, 1991
11 -V -9t
PETITIONER:
Gladstone Norwood Trust
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
412 and 414 East Rand Road
PUBLICATION
DATE:
February 12, 1991
REQUEST:
Rezoning from R-1 Single -Family
Residence to B-2 Business Office
to allow construction of an
office building. Also variation
from Section 14.3012.E to waive
the requirement to provide one
12' x 35' loading space.
ZBA MEMBERS
PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT:
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Marcia and Bill Kurczodina,
Jim Bushemi,
John Daughtery
all residents of Hill Street.
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting to rezone the property at 412 and
414 East Rand Road from R-1 Single Family Residence to B-2
Business office to allow construction of an office building.
The applicant is also requesting a variance from Section
14.3012.B to waive the requirement to provide one 12' x 35'
loading space.
The petitioner, Vincent Manglardi of 1405 S. Busse Road,
stated that he is a beneficiary of the trust, presented the
case stating that they are proposing to construct a 14,500
square foot, two-story office building at the site which
currently is the Spear's Nursery. Mr. Manglardi also stated
that they requesting a waiver of the loading space
requirement because deliveries will likely be made via UPS or
similar service,
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the B-2 office use is a desirable use and an attractive
office building would provide better entrance to the
neighborhood than the existing. Mr. Clements stated that
i/i'
0
J
fig r
�i
ZB 11-V--91
t,
r 1:ebxLary 28_, 1991
page 2 of 3
'i
staff asked the peter`for a site plan whicj would meet
i
a1.1 setback reclui rertk� �, -s and the landscape ordnance code.
i '
The petitioner res'.1 a'site plan which meets all,
C p �/,
realua rements r A, eznents noted that there zs„ Single
-Family residences,
,',/"the East of the property ;end Feels that
the 20 ft. landscap 1etba6k will properly scr_en the
proposed, Luildiing t -the neighborhood. 'Mr G;lements stated
that the 'plan f"";rmm '� %n reviewed and approved the proposed
subdivision. They all ,app peed a, change / the comprehent ive
plan to allow offic" Staff believes ,this mall.
affie:e building xs a pr har�iate arse in Chas ocataon and
r. i. 11 pro i.de a ,ml � kle 4,eighbo,r to res�dentt�al
development.
Mr. Lannon, question, %the loading dock variatjn. fir.
Clements state, thaa is an appropriate re,4uest for such
a small building
l
111�r
Marcia Kurczodina, �a18E'. Hill Street, staffed that the
main concerns are t sand safety and the +�iveway being
off Hill. Street 'Mr 'jKurczodina feels that th e will make
z�
i/;
the corner more dacx'� �us. Mrs. Kurczodina alsSa is concerned
,
with water and f1oo„�� problems and the 1ightng of the
proposed parking lot K,rs. Kurczodina then. presented a
proposed site -plan W n up by a neighbor who is a
architectural engin,, The Plan shows t -he access
off Rand Road. Mrs. �f zo in�i stato--ad thaat. th %neLghbors feel.
this would be more eia..xafl to the office buldin and
r �
t,hemselves by not c ”' �ing"more traffic on the ,orner of Hill
St, and Rand Road., would also reduce the dumber of curb
I
cuts on Rand Road f �ffi 3 to 1 . 'Mrs.. Kurczodi. ,, . also stated
it
that there is a con,, 'x regariiing the screenzn of the air-
�/;
conditioning heatiri ;nits and drainage from tie parking lot,
ll,'
Jim Bushemi, 50.1 Ea; ran Cour*, stated his concerns on the
i
parking lot drasnag �•
John: paughtery 520 1 St,, stated his concerts on, the
traffic build fop o ill Street and the eater and flooding.
;
Bill Kurczodina 51 6; HiLl St„ stated thatthey are not
opposed to the; offs, -,building but do have con erns
specifically on the�!, iveway Incation offHxll �'t..
Chairman ]3asnik duel'oned if anyone is opposeet to the
rezoning r)f the pre ty. ',Mr. Eiircz:odina stat ct they were not
opposed to the propf°� d office use.
i
'1r. Clements s'latec
at when the building pts are
Al
�Il
ZBA-6-Z-91
ZBA-11-V-91
February 28, 1991
Page 3 of 3
submitted he will invite Mrs. Kurczodina to look them over.
He also stated that he feels I.D.O.T. will not be in favor of
a driveway on Rand Road for a small office building if
another access point is available.
The Board then generally discussed the request and had no
objections.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request to rezone the properties from R-1 Single -
Family Residential to B-2 Business Office to allow
Construction of an office building.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners variation request to waive the one required 12' x
35' loading space.
Mrs. Brothers moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Brettrager,
Skowron
NAYS: Basnik
Motion carried by a vote of 5-1.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
FEBRUARY 20, 1991
CALL 10 ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mcunt Prospect Plan Commission was called to
order by, a.airman Velasco at 8:00 P.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South
Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Present upon Roll Call:
Absent:
Frank Boege ,
Frank Breitsameter
Lynn Kloster
Elizabeth Luxem
Tom McGovern
William Navigato
Louis Velasco, Chairman
Tom Borrelli
Village Staff Present: M'-chael Sims, Staff Planner
Press Staff Present:
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Larry Smith, Diily Herald
Jo Nelle Robinson, Mt. Prospect Journal
Mrs. Luxem moved, seconded by Mr. Boege, that the minutes of February 6,
1991 be approved as submitted. All members voted Aye and Chairman Velasco
declared the minutes approved.
Final Plat Of Wal-Mart Subdivision, 930 East MountProsPlaza
Mr. Sims reported that the linen for this subdivision was not ready and
asked that it be continued. Chairman Velaxco agreed to continue it to the
next meeting.
This case involved a Comprehensive Plan hearing from single family residential
to general commercial/offices a Subdivision into a single family lot of
record, and a Development Code modification.
Chairman Velasco opened the Public hearing at 8:03 P.M.
The applicant, Mr. Vince Manglardi and Mr. Dan Cafaro, the present owner
of the property involved in the petition were present.
PI'M COKCSSION MINUTES
MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, 1
The property involved inc
the applicant was r0qW$t
Family Residential to 00
request for change in the
sistent with the genera
Land -Use Plan.
Concerns raised by Plan,
would have on the single
east side and possiblev
without street lights. MJ
berm and landscapping at
problems for the residehl
Mr. Sims commented that I
which is less than the 31
Comment was made that lil
problem. Mr. Manglardi v
property after dark becw
Mr. Velasco closed the p
Motion was made by Mr. 8
request to change the Co
Subdivision from Single'
be approved. The vote wa
that he voted against to
without lighting would t
Mr. Kloster moved, se09n
Rosen Subdivision be ap;
to sign the linen. The N
Mr. McCoyarn moved, secc
modification to permit a
Rand Road until requestA
Prospect and contingent
anteeing the installatit
6 Ayes; 1 Pass. Motion I
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Carmunity DevelopmeV
B. Comprehensive Plan:
C. Development Code:
D. Text Amendment:
m"It, two single fa
Xmpribensive Plan c
v=rcial/Of f ice. St
mg*rs were t)
i adjacent to
earing at 8:09 P.M.
ase he fel
vigato, tb
Chairman
I Nay. 14,
b report
L' report
10 report
b report
a
for which
I Single
wiewed the
was,,con-
mt general
klffl�71 feet deep
village code.
L4alleviate the
nwl%traffic to the
t the
2 in the Clarewood
rcial/Office
Mc Boege stated
ncrased traffic
hii"i =vA4 ="A
velopment cod
PAGE 3
NEW BUSMESS
Hr. Sim reported on the progress of the Block Grant funding proposals
for FY 91 and stated that Mr. Clements would attend the Finance Ccam-
ission meeting the following evening for review of the proposals.
AWOUROM
There being no further business, Chairman Velasco adjourned the meeting
at 8:40. P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECt
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN K --
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-6-Z-91, ZBA-11-V-91
APPLICANT: GLADSTONE NORWOOD TRUST (DAN COFFARO, SPL)
ADDRESS: 412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD
LOCATION MAP:
777:7
�113
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
LOT SIZE:
% COVERAGE:
FA. R. :
R-1 (Requesting rezoning to B-2 Business Office)
52,693 sq. ft.
69.4%
N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting to rezone 412 and 414 East Rand Road from R-1 Single Family
Residence to B-2 Business Office to allow construction of an office building. The applicant
is also requesting a variance tD Section 14.3012.13 to waive the requirement to provide one
12' x 35' loading space.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 14,500 square foot, two-
story office building at 412 and 414 Rand Road. Proposed tenants include real estate
related businesses, such as, r ' ealtors, attorneys and surveyors. The property is currently
zoned R-1 Single Family and therefore, must be rezoned to allow the proposed use.
The applicant is also requesing, a waiver of the loading space requirement stating that
deliveries will likely be made via UPS or similar service.
Surrounding Area Developm t and Potential Impact: The property owner, Mr. Coffaro,
originally intended to deve the front of this lot with an office use and create two single
family lots to serve as a butter to the existing residential development to the east. Further
consideration revealed that tie front half of the lot alone was not large enough to feasibly
develop an office and associ ted parking. Mr. Coffaro did not feel developing the entire
property for residential use as desirable given the commercial potential of frontage on
Rand Road. Consequently, e current proposal was developed which utilizes the entire
property for a professional olyfice building.
The proposed office use requkes commercial zoning. The applicant is proposing to develop
the property for professional office uses and is therefore requesting B-2 Business Office
zoning. The B-2 Zoning District is relatively restrictive. Permitted uses are limited to
office, funeral parlor, municipal and institutional uses. Uses that are more commercial in
nature, such as restaurants at d retail shopping centers, are not permitted in B-2 Districts.
The Comprehensive Plan inch motes that a mix of residential and commercial development
is appropriate in this are along Rand Road. It encourages coordinated development which
attempts to consolidate uses and zoning. It also states that landscaped screening should be
used to buffer and visually integrate new commercial development with existing residential
development.
The eastern part of this lot iVesignated for residential development in the Comprehensive
Plan. The applicant is conc ently requesting a change in the Comprehensive Plan ,to allow
office use. In addition, the 10� is being resubdivided to create one new lot of record. These
items were reviewed by the Plan Commission on February 20, 1991. Staff notes that Matz
Funeral Home which is located on the adjacent property north along Rand Road is zoned
B-2. It is an island of commercially zoned property within a large residential district. The
proposed rezoning would be consistent with the funeral home. It would also create a larger,
consolidated area of B-2 zoning along Rand Road.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
Office development is appropriate along Rand Road and more desirable than higher
intensity commercial/retail uses adjacent to residential development. Office uses tend to
generate traffic at typical rush hours in the morning and afternoon, with sporadic traffic
during the rest of the day. Commercial/retail uses on the other hand, typically generate a
more steady flow of traffic with a significant amount during evening hours.
Staff believes that an attractive, well -landscaped office development plan can provide a good
buffer or transition between residential development and more intensive commercial
development.
Site, Plan Description
The proposed site plan includes a two-story (14,500 sq. ft.) office building and associated
parking for 58 cars. The exterior of the office building is proposed to be of brick and glass
construction. It was located at the front of the lot to take advantage of visibility along Rand
Road. In addition, the applicant wanted the two-story building to be as far from the
residents as possible to minimize its impact.
The entrance to the parking is off Hill Street and therefore won't increase the number of
curb cuts on Rand Road. The entrance was set back from the intersection to allow stacking
for 5-6 cars without blocking ingress and egress to the parking lot. Because there are no
through streets in this neighborhood, existing traffic patterns should not be greatly impacted
by this development. However, an office development will increase traffic at this
intersection, particularly during rush hours.
All the required setbacks have been met for both the building and the parking lot. A 20
foot green area along the east property line will be landscaped to provide 100% screening
of the parking lot adjacent to the residents. Staff suggests that berms be installed in this
area to improve the appearance and increase the screening potential. Berms may also help
buffer noise from the parking lot.
Lighting of the parking lot cannot "spill over" onto adjacent properties. Staff suggests that
lighting be kept to the minimum acceptable level and that light fixtures be placed as far
from the residents as possible.
Parking lot screening and interior landscaping, and foundation plantings around the building
are also proposed. The landscaping indicated on the site plan meets the general
requirements of the Landscape Ordinance. However, a landscape plan indicating specific
plant names must be submitted for review by staff, along with other required building plans.
Request to —W-4ime Uading Space Requirern�nja
The applicant is requesting to waive the requirement to provide one IT x 35' loading space.
The applicant believes that deliveries for likely tenants would be via UPS or similar small
truck/van vehicles. As such, a loading space to accommodate a semi -trailer would not be
necessary. Staff agrees with this rationale noting that many professional office uses do not
have large truck delivery needs. However, staff suggests some modifications be made to the
parking layout to ensure that the access to the door is clear and not used for vehicle
parking. This would benefit delivery personnel as well as employees and customers.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4
QMER VILL&GE STAFF WMMENM
The following comments were made by other departments:
1. Public Works notes that, no driveway openings will be allowed on Rand Road. They
also request that the depressed curb along Rand Road be replaced with 6" barrier
curb.
2. Inspection Services suggests that consideration be given to adding a right turn lane
on Rand Road.
3. Police Department suggests that the traffic patterns in the area should be carefully
studied to determine neighborhood impact. This should be reviewed by the Crime
Prevention Bureau.
4. Engineering and building plans must be submitted for review. Detention facilities
must be included in the engineering plans.
SUMMAUMCOMMENDATION
Staff believes that an office development is appropriate in this location along Rand Road.
The proposed B-2 zoning is consistent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and wo:
coordinate with Matz Funeral Home. This is a sensitive site being located so close
residential development. It is important that attractive landscaping be provided to ensu.'-<:
adequate buffering and help blend the office development into the residential area. The
proposed site plan indicates that all setbacks and screening requirements will be met. Staff
believes that this development will greatly improve the appearance of this site which
currently contains several small old buildings. Consequently the entrance to the
neighborhood will be made more attractive.
Staff supports the requests to rezone this property to B-2 Business Office and to waive the
loading space requirements conditioned on:
1. Specific landscape plans must be submitted for staff review and approval.
2. Building exterior shall be of brick and glass materials.
3. Roof -top mechanical equipment shall be screened.
DMC:hg
CAF/
3/21/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO B-2 (BUSINESS OFFICE) DISTRICT
AS IT PERTAINS TO 412 & 414 EAST RAND
WHEREAS, Gladstone Norwood Trust and Savings Bank as Trustee under
Trust No. 1274 dated 7/18/88 (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner), has filed an application to rezone the property
commonly known as 412 and 414 East Rand Road (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property), legally described as follows:
Parcel 1: The South 88 feet of the North 550 feet of the
South EAst 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34 (except the
East 400 feet) in Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the center of Rand
Road in Cook County, Illinois
Parcel 2: That part of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of
the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11
East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying Northeast of Rand
Road (except the North 550 feet and except the East 400 feet
thereof) all in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from R-1 to B-2 (Business Office) District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 6-Z-91, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
February, 1991 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having
been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of
February, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees, of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of
ZBA 6-Z-91 and have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to
a B-2 (Business Office) District.
CTION This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
ZBA 6-Z-91
Page 2 of 2
from and after its
form in the manner 1,
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
approval and publication in pamphl-"
by law.
POEM
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF/
3/22/91
I
101JOIMM
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, Gladstone Norwood Trust and Savings Bank as Trustee under
Trust No. 1274 dated 7/18/88 (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has requested a variation from the Zoning ordinance
(Chapter 14) of the Village of Mount for property commonly known
as 412 and 414 East Rand Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject
Property) and legally described as follows:
Parcel 1: The South 88 feet of the North 550 feet of the
South EAst 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34 (except the
East 400 feet) in Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the center of Rand
Road in Cook County, Illinois
Parcel 2: That part of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of
the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11
East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying Northeast of Rand
Road (except the North 550 feet and except the East 400 feet
thereof) all in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.
3012.a to waive the requirement for one loading space 121 x 351 in
conjunction with the construction of a 2 -story office building; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested,
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 11-V-91, before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
February, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of January, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the village have given further consideration to the variation
being the subject of ZBA 11-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property
a variation from Section 14.3012.B to waive the requirement for a
121 x 351 loading dock.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other
requirements of said Development Code shall apply to the Subject
Property.
0
ZBA 11-V-91
Page 2 of 2
SECTION F This
from and after its
form in the manner
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
ice shall be in full force and effect
, approval and publication in pamphlet
i by law.
S _ day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
, 1991.
CAF/
3/29/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OF 1981 FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have adopted an official comprehensive Plan (Land
Use Map) for the Village of Mount Prospect as a guideline for
development within the Village; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that a need exists to amend the
official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect from
time to time; and
WHEREAS, a request has been filed, in conjunction with a request
to amend the official Zoning Map of the Village, to amend the
Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village for property generally
located at the northwest corner of Rand Road and Hill Street
(commonly known as 412 and 414 East Rand Road); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 24, Article 11-12-7 of the Illinois
Revised Statutes, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount
Prospect held a Public Hearings on February 20, 1991, pursuant to
proper legal notice being published in the Mount Prospect Herald
on January 31, 1991, to consider the proposed change in the
Official Comprehensive Plan as specified hereinabove; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have considered the
request to amend the Official Comprehensive Plan and have
determined that the best interests of the Village would be served
by amending the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount
Prospect as it applies to property generally located at the
northwest corner of Rand Road and Hill Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby amend the Official
Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect with respect
to property located at the northwest corner of Rand Road and Hill
Street (commonly known as 412 and 414 East Rand Road) from Single
Family/Residential District to Business Office District.
SECTION TWO: The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect
is hereby authorized and directed to file notice of this amendment
to the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect
with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, as provided by the Statutes
of the State of Illinois.
SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect
is hereby directed to published, in pamphlet form, said
Official Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect with
the amendment specified herein, pursuant to the Statutes of the
State of Illinois made and provided.
mop!!=
0
Comprehensive Plan
412 & 414 East Rand
Page 2 of 2
SECTION FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the -manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF
3/21/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16
ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, Gladstone Norwood Trust and Savings Bank (hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner) has requested modifications from the
Development ' Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property
commonly known as 412 and 414 East Rand Road (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
Parcel 1: The South 88 feet of the North 550 feet of the
South EAst 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34 (except the
East 400 feet) in Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the center of Rand
Road in Cook County, Illinois
Parcel 2: That part of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of
the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11
East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying Northeast of Rand
Road (except the North 550 feet and except the East 400 feet
thereof) all in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting a modification from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) to waive the requirement for street
lights to be installed along Rand Road; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modification from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property at their regular meeting on
February 20, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendation
relative to the modification requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, and the
President and Board of Trustees have determined that the best
interests of the Village would be served in granting the
modifications requested herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE; That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property
a modification from the Development Code (Chapter 16) to waive the
requirement to install street lights along Rand Road subject to the
provision that Petitioner enter into a Restrictive Covenant
assuring the installation of street lights on Rand Road at a such
time as required either by the Village, Cook County of State of
Illinois Department of Highways.
412 & 414 East Rand
Page 2 of 2
SECTION TJJREE: Except for the modification from the Development
Code granted herein, all other requirements of said Development
Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This Or inance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fiel,
Village Clerk
CAF/
3/22/91
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT RELATIVE TO PROPERTY
COMM
,--,ONLY KNOWN AS 412 AND 414 EASTN ROAD
WHEREAS, Gladstone Norwood Trust and Savings Bank as Trustee under
Trust No. 1274 has received approval from the Village Board and
appropriate departments necessary to develop property commonly
known as 412 and 414 East Rand Road, generally located at the
northwest corner of Rand Road and Hill Street, and legally
described as follows:
Parcel 1: The South 88 feet of the North 550 feet of the
South EAst 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34 (except the
East 400 feet) in Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, lying Easterly of the center of Rand
Road in Cook County, Illinois
Parcel 2: That part of the North 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of
the Northeast 1/4 of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11
East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying Northeast of Rand
Road (except the North 550 feet and except the East 400 feet
thereof) all in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect requires installation of street lights in conjunction with
the development of property; and
WHEREAS, in certain instances the installation of public
improvements, including but not limited to street lights, is not
feasible at the time of development, however the developer is
required to provide those improvements as such time as the Village,
Cook County, or Illinois Department of Transportation deems
appropriate; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Plan Commission did consider the
request for a modification from the Development Code at their
regular meeting held June 6, 1990, relative to the installation of
-street lights on Rand Road and the Plan Commission has submitted
its recommendation to the Village Board to authorize a Restrictive
Covenant against the subject property insuring installation of
street lights on Rand Road at such time as the Village, Cook
County, or Illinois Department of Transportation deems appropriate;
and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees have determined that the
best interests of the Village would be served by having the
developer enter into a Restrictive Covenant, a copy of which is
attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A",
guaranteeing the installation of specified improvements at such a
time as deemed reasonable and proper.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the Mayor and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
N
Restrictive Covenant
Page 2 of 2
SECTIQN TWQ: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees do hereby
authorize execution of Restrictive Covenant,, a copy of which
Restrictive Covenant is attached hereto and hereby made a part
hereof as Exhibit "A", for property commonly known 412 and 414 East
Rand Road, which Restrictive Covenant guarantees the installation
of public improvements along Rand Road at such time deemed
necessary.
SECTION THREE: That t Village Clerk is hereby directed to record
with the Recorder of Deeds or Registrar of Titles, whichever is
applicable, a fully executed copy of the Agreement being the
subject of this Resolution.�
SECTIONO UR.: That t�his Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
N
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this -- day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fiel
Village Clerk
RESTRICTIVE COVENANT BY AND BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS AND
THE OWNER-DEVELOPER OF CERTAIN PROPERTY WITHIN SAID
VILLAGE REGARDING COMPLETION OF REQUIRED PUBLIC
R
412 and 414 East Rand Road
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 16 entitled "Development" of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois certain public improvements are required to be
constructed and installed by owners and developers of property within the Village, as part
of the approval for the development of such property; and
WHEREAS, the schedule for accomplishing the construction and installation of such
public improvements by the owner -developer of the property under development is often
in conflict with other public improvement projects adjacent to or within the vicinity of said
property so as to render the accomplishment of such public improvements by the owner -
developer to be practically or economically unfeasible until the same can be combined with
or scheduled so as to conform with such other public improvements affecting the subject
property under development; and
WHEREAS, such other public improvement projects are administered by the Village,
County or State, officials over which the owner -developer has no control, and in some
instances those improvements to be accomplished by the owner -developer with respect to
the property under development cannot be completed until the other improvements under
Village, County or State control have been accomplished; and
WHEREAS, under such circumstances, it is deemed to be inequitable to delay
development of the property under development or to require the owner -developer to
establish a cash escrow, letter of credit or improvement bond for the purpose of guaran-
teeing the completion of required public improvements due to the delay caused by the
intervening or subsequent accomplishment of other public improvement projects under
administration and control of the Village, County or State; and
WHEREAS, Chapter 16 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois provides that
in lieu of a cash escrow, letter of credit or development bond, the owner -developer may
execute a restrictive covenant to be recorded and to run with the land as a guarantee that
the required public improvements shall be completed with respect to the property under
development,
NOW, THEREFORE, i , accordance with the provisions of the said Chapter 16 of
the Village Code of Mount pr spect, Illinois, the Undersigned, Owner -Developer does
hereby covenant with the Village of Mount Prospect, an Illinois municipal corporation, as
follows: f
1. The Undersignl is the Owner and Development of the following described
property within the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, to wit:
Lot 1 in Manglardi Rosen Subdivision, being a subdivision in the southeast
corridor of the northemst corridor of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11 East
of the Third Principal`Meridiar4 in Cook County, Illinois.
2. A plan of development of the described property by the Undersigned has been
approved by the Village of M 6imt Prospect, which approval includes the completion of the
following public improvemeri s contained in and provided as a part of the plans, to wit:
To purchase and inststreet lights on Rand Road per State of Illinois and Village
of Mount Prospect C.1%, e when requested by either governmental entity.
3. For a period o twenty (20) years commencing from the date hereof, the
Undersigned shall undertake above -stated improvements with sixty (60) days after being
so advised by the Village ofount Prospect to commence such construction and instal-
lation work, and shall cotu4nue said work without interruption or delay, until the
improvements are completed"a satisfactory manner and in accordance with Village plans
and specifications pertaining veto.
4. This Covenant ► complete the said public improvements as herein contained
shall run with the said prope, , and for the period of time as set forth herein. Nothing in
this Covenant shall in any prevent the alienation or sale of the subject property or any
portion thereof, except that d sale shall be subject to the provisions hereof and to the
plan of development pe `to the property, and the new owner shall be both benefited
and bound by the conditions `d restrictions herein expressed.
- 2 -
5. This Covenant shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the
parties hereto and their successors and assigns in title and interest and the provisions hereof
shall be enforceable in a proceeding at law or in equity against the person or persons
seeking to violate the same including an action for injunctive relief, specific performance
or to recover damages or other fines and penalties as may be established in such violation.
In the event that the owner -developer of the subject property fails to complete the required
improvements or pay a proportionate share of the required improvements by other
contractors within the specified time periods herein, the value of such improvements shall
be entered as a lien against the property due and payable within sixty (60) days after
notification to proceed with the improvements.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals this
day of , 19,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
ATTEST: E PRESID
VILLAGE CLERK
Real Estate Index No. 03-34-207-033,and 03-34-207-014
- 3 -
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 11, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-12-V-91, LINCOLN STREET PARTNERS
(NICK PAPANICHOLAS, RIC DIESCHBOURG)
LOCATION: 230-240 EAST LINCOLN STREET
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Lincoln Street Partners, (Nick Papanicholas and Rick
Diescbbourg). The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate
construction of an industrial building and on-site parking at 230-240 East Lincoln Street:
1. Section 14.2202.E to allow 5 foot parking lot setbacks along interior lot lines rather
than 10 ft.; and to allow a 15 foot front parking lot setback rather than 30 feet.
2. Section 14.3012.E to waive the required one 12' x 50' loading space.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991. At the
meeting, David Wolf, Architect, described the proposed 13,340 square foot building. He
stated that the lot is narrower and smaller than current standards for 1-1 lots. As a result,
the setback variations are needed.
Richard Dieschbourg, Vice President of Lincoln Street Partners, also presented testimony
in support of the project He indicated that Nicholas and Associates, a building contractor
firm, would eventually occupy 50%-60% of the building space. Other tenants would also
likely be building contractors or related businesses.
Julie Farnham, Planner, noted that this lot is an existing non -conforming I-1 lot which
would be difficult to develop without some variations. She stated that the parking lot
setbacks requested were similar to setbacks granted for Parenti & Raffaelli last year on the
adjacent lot. She also noted that all other Code requirements including, building setbacks
and lot coverage, have been met.
With regard to the loading space requirement, Ms. Farnham indicated that four overhead
doors on the west side of the building would provide adequate service vehicle access to the
warehouse areas. These doors would be sufficient for loading for the small individual units.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
March 11, 1991
The Zoning Board of Appeals
lot and similar development e,
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, d
following variations for constr,u
Street.
1. Section 14.2202.E to
ft. front parking lot sell
2. Section 14.3012.E tc
DMC:hg
assed the request noting that this was a small industrial
on surrounding lots.
aping Board of Appeals recorarriends approval of the
.of anoffice/wpxehouse building at 230-240 East Lincoln
N 5 fp.' parking,lot. setbacks on interior lot lines and a 15
rive the required loading space.
JAMES M. ELLMAN
o.
_...__ _ .111 J.A. KA/t'A YrtTla to a. nagCl. um A m"Tuto a � a'To WR All w ra
a unto u, ealau a "M urn 11. Wt a ti: AW rr WIPAL ="UNe u ms
1 M
��a 'M*r...�..{". 2'7>7rBL �:I LL u.yR�GG7uRlMLVr3�4fi3.0
T'OrAL q,rr-. AGaA 43 Sr'Yq'AF.
TOTAL CA%2"4 Ar -RA ZI 9T2ai.
MFAG IMPEL,M,4,MY A"A'S 4I's x•
rAuo. I, IA. S, 2`I %-4.
TLrrAL I.OY' GAN!!04!
7e s%4gpll ~-
GhIMJ?, zrlALC"S
IYAIf NO' : nog ..W,JO:
SICK 34�
? to' MYiI.
'*C1'AL Dw�DrW.. f*4fd't �O'IAAYI.
PA4 4. 4 yA" IVYC;I$YrYA}Mb
Ap4'%S 1A.P, wY'A!-tr YLM�i'3C+CSSr*i. `l -Ar--`+
GrA.'yud'1.2Y, ax�+CG:ct4c4+q+vx7 aw ' ZTcde7
TvrnL `32GAc�
�a+ar_ ecruei r+atc'c -64".+
ar*•„Z :ZCA�
AC14AL VG,.5 4 z ` Z 4108
dor. W4 ✓e%
-W.UM "PAO” 14 &29A I C 'Z' -SO'
AcnAL A.A'MO-4 AMA 4 0- CCY4C (9 low.
a
�Y
Z70 77aCU �4Gh "'+yT^
L /Nco,�n✓
ST
eouln of 4zlon
courw!Ar,.
'O
M
^
� MIIMI MI�M�INIM M WM u1"`�I.
�W WMWMWWIMelw4,'M XMM1fY NMY
,
,
i1
A Y�,
M�yyy���111`
0
- O
y
Ov�iYi1O4M�!�0/1p1fM000
T'OrAL q,rr-. AGaA 43 Sr'Yq'AF.
TOTAL CA%2"4 Ar -RA ZI 9T2ai.
MFAG IMPEL,M,4,MY A"A'S 4I's x•
rAuo. I, IA. S, 2`I %-4.
TLrrAL I.OY' GAN!!04!
7e s%4gpll ~-
GhIMJ?, zrlALC"S
IYAIf NO' : nog ..W,JO:
SICK 34�
? to' MYiI.
'*C1'AL Dw�DrW.. f*4fd't �O'IAAYI.
PA4 4. 4 yA" IVYC;I$YrYA}Mb
Ap4'%S 1A.P, wY'A!-tr YLM�i'3C+CSSr*i. `l -Ar--`+
GrA.'yud'1.2Y, ax�+CG:ct4c4+q+vx7 aw ' ZTcde7
TvrnL `32GAc�
�a+ar_ ecruei r+atc'c -64".+
ar*•„Z :ZCA�
AC14AL VG,.5 4 z ` Z 4108
dor. W4 ✓e%
-W.UM "PAO” 14 &29A I C 'Z' -SO'
AcnAL A.A'MO-4 AMA 4 0- CCY4C (9 low.
'"�
Z70 77aCU �4Gh "'+yT^
L /Nco,�n✓
ST
eouln of 4zlon
courw!Ar,.
^
� MIIMI MI�M�INIM M WM u1"`�I.
�W WMWMWWIMelw4,'M XMM1fY NMY
anoj qvq4 paqu4s JTOM 'jX 'TTTGJJPa Pup T4uaJed ss qons
uJoDull uo spUIPTTnq IIRTjqsnpui puT4sTxa jaq-4o iq,4Tm waojTurt
TTTmpaqsanbad U0T4PTJpA N
401 WuT�vd*quojj aq4 4vq4 palv4s
jlo,q JK, SqoT Tvia4snpui aaaq4 Sq popunoajns sT pup T -I
;;OuOz STquaiino si S4iadoad aqq 4v4-4 Pa -4-64s JTOM 'JN -saxeds
asno,qajpm/aoTjjo 9-t do 4STSU00 TTT-" �iuTpjTnq aq4 qvq4
Paqv4s JTOM 'UK :SaOTJ-jo puiuivwaj aqq ono asuaT TTTm SaT41
. %09-%Og STTVT4UajDd Pup WuiplTnq ai4q do %ot Sdn000
SITPT4TUT TTTm sO4?TDOssv Pup svTOqDIN -Wild Jo4Dpj4uoo
u
!PTTnq La -ossa- pup svjoiqoiN joj asnoLlaxem pule aDtijo
uTpw a44 aq TIT -m p-uTpITnq pasodoad aq4 4vqq $wT48qs aspo
paquasaad '-asst Pup SpI0qJTN JOJ 4094T140JV 'JTOM PTAvG
pup *46 auld 'S 60C do Ijnoqqosaia pavqoTH 'j-014T4ad a4l
-aovds �uippoj oS x ZI
GUO padTnbaa Gq4 aATVM 04 HIZIOUtT U0140as
woaj 4sa,nbaj U0TqpTJp,'I p 'OSTV 'apoo Sq pa4sanbaj ss oc
tjvgq jaijqpa Nopqqas DoT $UT:qjpd 4uoij 19T Pup 401 UP144 Ja44VJ
SGUTJ 401 J0TJa4UT �WOTe s3jopqqas 4ol �ul3jjpd c !,iolTv 0-4
UOT qoGS WOJJ SU0T4pTa-e_,, WUT-4s,?nbaj sT jauoT4T-4ad
aq4 4Bq4 yUT4V4S aSUO ST144 paonpOJqUT NTUSVG UIRWJTE43
auoN :S311HYd allisaaaiNi/sabliargo
SPTSSpj Pjvuozj
:INHSUV
UOJMONS aTavqoTk
qaaqoa
sjaq4oja ST01
44pid PjpqoTH
UOUUVI Ja4ad
upwjTvi4D INTusPa qjaqTTO
:INHSadd SH3aKHK
- aaleds
IUTpVoj 09 X Zj allO PaJTnbaj
,?T44 aAlPM 04 a-ZIOE-VI U0143aS
-apoD Sq P@JTnbaj ss oc upq4
,IaLjqvj Nopq4as 40T IPuiMjpd 4uoi3
121 PUP 101 UV144 Jaq4vj SaUTT
4ol joija4ui 4uoTv sNovq4as q0I
Jpd c MOTTS 04 a.zozz.tj
uo,4DaS w0J3 su0T4vTJp1
:IsanoaH
1661 IZT Sapnaqa3
:aiva Noilvilla;Id
4@aa4S uTODUTI 4SPH OtZ-OCZ
:U6adOdd ID3f9IIS
sJau4JEd 4aGJ4S uTOOull
:EHNOIIIIHd
1661 18Z Saunjqaj :a4PG -uTaBaH
16-A-ZT *ON HSVD V9Z
SIVaddV JO aEVOS ONINOZ 133dSOHd INqON
3HI 30 ONIIJHN HVIDDHE HHI 30 SHIaNIX
overhead doors are I
WRrehnuse por'lons
a loading dock. Mr
from the Village st,
on all four buildin:
mechanical equipmen
plan.
Julie Farnham, Plan.
stated that this is
Is 140' wide making
variations. Miss Fa
are very similar to
which were approved
attempt was made to
approved plan for P
enntinued, stating
lane arcpss around
that staff have no
Mr. Lannon question
in. Mr. Dieschbourg
General Contractor,
nvorhead doors be.
y 12'. Chairman Bas
any parking on Linc
primary service is
indicated that they
going to 10 employe
Chairman Basnik the
petitioners request
interior lot lines
lot setback rather
the required one 12
conditions by staff
Mr. Brettrager move
UPON ROLL CALL: AYE
NAY
Motion carried by a
This Case must stil
ZB--,
Fel
Pal
ed for service access
building, elimWath
also stated that th(
11 be met which incli
des, screening of rot
landscaping per sW
r the Village of Moui
isting non-conformini
ry difficult to deve
stated that side and
proposed for Parent
year, Miss Farnham s'
inate the front setb;
and Raf4l1i. Miss 1
he Fire Department a:
oposed building, "lis:
ions,
t type of business tl
d that Nicholas and
ratt asked what size
If stated that the d,
estioned if the peti
. Mr. Wolf stated t]
er job sites. Mr. DO
ntly have 8 employee:
their parking needs
rtained A motion to
low a 5' parking lot
than 10' and a 15'
0' as required by Col
load:nk space incl,
Pratt seconded.
.non, Pratt, Brothers
wron, Bainik
.e
of 6-0.
,eard before the Gill
Michelle Thompso
Recording Secreta
ry 28, 1991
of 2
the
he need for
nditions
face brick
op
pproved
rospect,
1 lot which
without any
nt setbacks
d Raffelli
d that an
with the
ham
ved the fire
rnham stated
petitioner is
ociates are a.
11 the
s will be 12'
ner foresees
their
hbourg
potentially
e minimal.
along
king
o i,aivp
er,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount, Prospect, Illinois
--------------------
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN I' -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-12-V-91
APPLICANT: LINCOLN STREET PARTNERS
(NICK PAPANICHOLAS, RIC DIESCHBOURG)
ADDRESS: 230-240 EAST LINCOLN STREET
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING:
1-1
LOT SIZE:
45,500
% COVERAGE:
78.5%
F-A—R. :
29.3%
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Boar l of Appeals Page 2
R QUEST
The applicant is requesting the ,following variations to accommodate construction of an
industrial building and on-site rparking:
1. Section 14.2202.E to allow 5 foot parking lot setbacks along interior lot lines rather
than 10 ft. as required by Code.
2„ Section 14.3012.E to waive the required one 12' x 50' loading space.
Summary of application: 7ha applicant is proposing to construct a 13,340 sq. ft.
warehouse/office building at 36-240 East Lincoln Street. The building will consist of 4-
6 office/warehouse spaces. Likely tenants include building contractors with small office and
warehouse storage needs.
The applicant is seeking a variation to reduce the required parking lot and service drive
perimeter setbacks to five feet. In addition, the applicant is requesting a waiver of the
loading space requirements, Four overhead doors are provided for service access to the
warehouse portions of the building, eliminating the need for a loading dock.
Surrounding Area Developme it and Potential Impact: This property is an existing, non-
conforming I-1 lot. At 45,500, sq. ft., it is well below the current minimum four -acre size
standard for properties zonedII-1. The narrow (140) width makes it difficult to develop
without some variations. St notes that the surrounding block consists of similar, non-
conforming I-1 lots. Most of ese lots have been developed with, small, older industrial
uses. Last year similar parkin lot setback variations were granted for Parenti and Raffaelli
Furniture, located on the adja vitt lot directly to the west
The proposed building desi " ces offices aces aloe the east side of the building and
P P g � p P g
warehouses on the west. Pare is located in the front and the east of the building close
to the office entrances. A se drive loops around the west side of the building, providing
access to overhead doors inwarehouse areas. This 19-20 foot drive also provides fire
_01access around the building wtct was required by the Fire Department.
The double -sided building detgb; required fire access around the entire building; and the
narrow lot width all contril to the need for the setback variations. Staff notes that all
the building setbacks and hegit requirements meet or exceed Code requirements. In
addition, all required on-site; parking is provided and lot coverage is below the 80%
maximum allowed. Staff alsa notes that an attempt was made to coordinate the front
setback with the approved platl for Parenti and Raffaelli. Both will have 15 foot landscaped
front setbacks. A coordinated design of these adjacent properties will improve the
appearance of the street frontage directly across from Lions Park. The 5 foot side setbacks
are wide enough to accommo late hedge plantings for required screening.
Gil Bas'nik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The building is designed to allow delivery/service vehicles to drive into the warehouse areas
through overhead doors. The applicant states that the tenants in the building will not need
loading dock facilities. Delivery vehicles will consist of smaller trucks and vans as opposed
to semi -trailers. 'Staff has no objection to the request to waive the loading dock
requirement.
No major objections were cited by other Village staff. The Fire Department has reviewed
and approved the location and design of the service drive which will also function as a fire
lane. Engineering notes that the reduced sideyards may hinder access to utilities within
easements. The location of hydrants, other utilities and detention are subject to engineering
plan review.
RUAW U
Despite the size constraints inherent to this existing non -conforming industrial lot, the
applicant is proposing a development site plan that meets most current Zoning Code
requirements. The 5 ft. parking setbacks requested will provide space for required
landscape screening. In addition, the requested setbacks are similar to those granted last
year for Parenti and Raffaelli on the adjacent lot. Staff has no objection to the requested
parking setbacks or the waiver of loading space requirements. Staff recommends approved
of the request as presented on the site plan conditioned on:
Face brick on all four building facades.
2. Screening of roof -top mechanical equipment.
3. Landscaping per staff approved plan.
NEW
CAF
3/22/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 230 - 240 EAST LINCOLN STREET
WHEREAS, 1st National Bank of Des Plaines as Trustee under Trust
No. 21452145 and Lincoln Street Partners (hereinafter referred to
as *Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter
14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property
commonly known as 230 and 240 East Lincoln Street (hereinafter
referr'ed to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 11 in J. A. Weber's Addition to Mount Prospect, being
a subdivision of part of the East 1/2 of the Northwest
1/4 of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of
the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois,
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks the following variations in order to
construct an office/warehouse structure on the Subject Property:
1. A variation from Section 14.2202.E to allow a five foot
(51) interior side yard for a parking lot in lieu of the
required 10 feet parking;
2. A variation from Section 14.2202.E to allow a 15 foot
front yard for a parking lot in lieu of the required 30
feet;
3. A variation from Section 14.3012.B to waive the one
required 121 x 501 loading space; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 12-V-91 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
February, 1991, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of February, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 12-V-91 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the
following:
1. A variation from Section 14.2202.E to allow a five foot
(51) interior side yard for a parking lot.
ZBA 12-V-91
Page 2 of 2
2. A variation from Section 14.2202.E to allow a 15 foot
front yard for a parking lot.
3. A variation from Section 14.3012.B to waive the one
required 121 x 501 loading space.
SECTION THREE, That the site plan, including the landscape design,
for the development of the Subject Property, is attached hereto and
hereby made a part here of as Exhibit "A".
SECTION FOUR: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION . -FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage,,approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST.:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
day of '1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER , WL -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 12, 1991
SUBJECT: RECAPTURE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CODE
AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS IN THE VILLAGE CODE
Attached you will find an Ordinance amending Chapter 8 and Chapter 16 which will clarify,
improve and consolidate regulations governing recapture agreements. At the present time,
recapture agreements are controlled by ordinances in both the Development Code and
under Miscellaneous Provisions in the Municipal Code. In essence, the proposed Recapture
Agreement Ordinance will change the wording of Section 8.511 to simply refer to Section
16.609 of the Development Code for all regulations regarding recapture agreements. Under
the Development Code, recapture agreements could be requested for an expanded number
of public facility improvements and the details of such agreements would be controlled by
the Village Board.
At the request of the Village Board, the Plan Commission reviewed this item during their
regular meeting on Wednesday, March 6, 1991 and voted 8-0 in favor of recommending its
approval. The Village Attorney and Village staff have reviewed the Ordinance and have
no objections to it.
DMC:hg
bh/caf
1/8/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 AND CHAPTER 16
OF THE VILLAGE CODES OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 8.511 entitled "Reimbursement for
Facilities Beneficial to Property and Part of the Property Owned
or Controlled by Such Person; Collection of Fees from Owners" of
Chapter 8 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect be amended in its
entirety and the following substituted therefor; so that
hereinafter said Section 8.511 of Chapter 8 of the Village Code
shall be and read as follows:
Sec. 8.511. Reimbursement for Facilities Beneficial to
Property not Part of the Property Owned or
Controlled by Such Person; Collection of Fees
From Owners.
The President and Board of Trustees shall have the authority
to adopt an Ordinance providing for the apportionment of costs
of certain public improvements pursuant to Section 16.609 of
this Code.
SECTION TWO: That Section 16.609 entitled "Recapture Agreement"
of Chapter 16 be amended in its entirety and the following
substituted therefor; so that hereinafter said Section 16.609 of
Chapter 16 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be and read
as follows:
Of Sec. 16.609. Recapture ordinances.
A. Wherever: (1) a Municipal Ordinance of the Village
requires the installation of any water mains, sanitary
sewers, storm drains, roadways or other public
facilities; and (2) where, in the opinion of the
corporate authorities such facilities may be used for the
benefit of additional property not controlled by the
person of whom installation is required; and (3) such
water mains, sanitary sewer, storm drains, roadways or
other facilities are to be dedicated to the public, the
corporate authorities may, by Ordinance, require that
additional property benefitted by such facilities not be
permitted to be developed or not be permitted to connect
to the facilities unless a fair and reasonable portion
of certified costs of installation, including engineering
costs are reimbursed to the installing party.
1. The Village shall have the sole authority to
determine the following:
a. The amount of interest, if any, which may be
charged to a benefitted property owner (not to
exceed 10% simple interest/annum);
b. The method by which the costs are to be
certified;
C. The fair and reasonable apportionment of costs;
d. The party responsible for collection of the
apportioned costs;
Recapture
Page 2 of 2
e. The, service charge due the Village for
establishment of the recapture ordinance;
f. Tie amount of time (not to exceed twenty years)
that the Ordinance shall remain in effect;
9- Tie amount by which the apportioned costs
s ould be reduced due to depreciation;
h. Mie method by which the ordinance is to be
eiforced;
i.Any other matters pertinent to the adoption of
tie Ordinance.
B. Any ordinarce adopted pursuant to Subsection A herein
shall be filed with the Recorder of Deeds of Cook County.
The Ordinana shall provide that it is the responsibility
of the installing owner to record the Ordinance.
C. The recording of the Ordinance, in this manner, shall
serve to notify persons interested in such additional
property of the fact that there will be a charge in
relation to such property for the connection to and use
of the facilities constructed under the Ordinance. 11
SECTION THREE: That this ordinance or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
aEqTjQjL FOUR. That (this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form as prodded by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 15, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-V-91, STEVE AND DEBRA DALEY
LOCATION: 214 SOUTH LOUIS STREET
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Steve and Debra Daley. The Daley's are requesting the
following variations to accommodate construction of a new detached garage, driveway,
building addition and patio:
1. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 3 ft. sideyard rather than 5 feet for a detached garage.
2. Section 21.601.A to allow a six foot fence along interior side and rear lot lines rather
than 5 feet.
3. Section 14.1102.E to allow 52.6% lot coverage rather than 45% permitted by Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of March 14, 1991,
At the meeting, Steve Daley presented testimony in support of the request. He explained
that they want to build a new garage located further to the back of their lot to provide more
open area next to the house. This would also allow space to construct a room addition. He
indicated that he originally requested a 2 foot setback for the garage but agrees with staff's
suggestion to provide a 3 foot setback instead.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that the lot is non -conforming with regard to width and
size which contributes to the need for variances. She stated that staff recognizes that several
garages in this older neighborhood have non -conforming setbacks. However; staff believes
that non -conformities should be reduced when possible. She also indicated that the
proposed longer driveway resulted in most of the additional lot coverage. Because the lot
is undersized, the potential for lot coverage variation is greater. She noted that staff has no
major objections to the variations requested.
The Zoning Board discussed the request, noting the narrow width and small lot size
contribute to the need for variances. Accordingly by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends approval of the variations requested, acknowledging that the original
request for a 2 foot sideyard setback had been amended by the petitioner to a 3 foot setback
instead.
WME
li :W,-bc
k
f c ` PeA
r
C41-11,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 14-V-91 Hearing Date: March 14, 1991
PETITIONER: Steven and Debra Daley
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 214 S. Louis
PUBLICATION DATE: February 26, 1991
REQUEST: Variations from Section
14.102.B.1 to allow a 2'
sideyard rather than 5' for a
detatched garage. Section
21.601.A to allow a 6' fence
along interior side and rear lot
lines. Section 14.1102.E to
allow 52.6% lot coverage rather
than 45%.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Richard Walbuesser
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.102.B.1
to allow a 2' sideyard rather than 5' for a detatched garage.
Section 21.601.A to allow a 6' fence along interior side and
rear lot lines rather than 5'. Section 14.1102.E to allow
52.6% lot coverage rather than 45% ,
The petitioner, Steve Daley of 214 S. Louis, presented his
case stating that he would like to replace his two -car
detatched garage with the same sideyard setback of 2'. Mr.
Daley stated that he received a letter from Mr. Clements,
Director of Planning and Zoning asking if he would chance his
request to a 3' sideyard setback. Mr. Daley stated that he
will change his request to 3'. Mr. Daley stated that
decorative stone will be put in on the side of the garage in
the 3' sideyard setback. Mr. Daley stated that the lot
coverage request is to accommodate a proposed room addition,
a new patio and replacement of the driveway which will be
increaseed in size because the garage will be set back
further on the property.
JI qpi
,
14-V-91
h 14;, 1991
Pa 2 of 2
jr
Mr. Galey stated th4l"/his,property is about 2111111
' higher then
his neighbors behin dim and to the side and ���ured the
Board that drainage, 11 be directed down his d4-iveway and
not on the neighbors"/�, operty, Mr. Daley then 100tated that the
of
51 fence height tarp ion is for privacy.
Julie Farnham, Pianfair the Village o� Mt osat�
, *,I a t od that that pets J her hats agreed to the�� set ack as
i,
suggested b s-taff ;�a,he lot coverage i mo 1y doe to the
factthat the drive h ngt will be incre sebecause the
new garage wi11 be ;che
1 r, ba can the prOperf '. Mi, s Farnham
stated that t.&ae Af a s xae11 belaw the maxi'
allowed
which suggests the el
,of tho house is appror/�ate to the
lot, size. 1 %l
/
Richard Waldbuesserfl :213 So. William, state�Jthat�he is the
neighbor directly b` nd the petitioner. Mr i'�ldbuesser
stated that his mai.'l� oncerns were regarding &� drainage but
after talking with'4u, neighbor he is satisfxll,e /,that the
drainage is being d%%&cted,.down,the driveway
Chairman Basnik thetertained a motion to gant the
pet.itioa�Aers request/,,,rrrr variations from Sec tx 111412.8.1 to
allow a 3' s.ideyard, ectibn . 2 1 . 6 0 1 . A to a11o4/01HG� 6 fence
along interior side"rd axrnd`rear list lines S tion
11.11412.E to allow Y�r % lot coverage.
/ I;
Mr. Cassidy moved ���, Skowron seconded.Iff
UPON ROLL CALL: A'Y�-`Lannon, Pratt, Brothers VXassidy,
�ret/trager, Skowron, Ba ;�ik
NX 'None
(�
Motion carried byte of 7-0.
This case must sti N e heard before the Vit, e Board.
v'/
a/
Michelle Thompsa a
Recording Secret 4/1#101/f
J Y
i
J1 j
414
%i
1
;i
im
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
11 If -- -4 1 .. A l ---i I
1521,
ON
::j fig==::
P=-�
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT'
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W—
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
MARCH 7, 1991
ZBA-14-V-91
STEVE AND DEBRA DALEY
214 SOUTH LOUIS STREET
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 Single Family Residential
LOT SIZE: 7,514 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 52.6% (proposed); 40.3% (existing)
FAL R. : 0.21
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is seeking the following variations to accommodate construction of a new
detached garage, driveway, building addition and patio:
1. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 2 ft. sideyard rather than 5 feet for a detached garage.
2. Section 21.601.A to allow a six foot fence along interior side and rear lot lines rather
than 5 feet.
3.* Section 14.1102.E to allow 52.6% lot coverage rather than 45%.
Summary of application: The applicant hopes to construct a new detached garage in the
rear yard two feet from the sidt lot line and 5 feet from the rear lot line. An existing
garage is located 2 feet from the side lot line and the Daley's would like to maintain the
same setback. The proposed garage is located further back on the lot than the existing
garage. A new driveway will be, constructed for access to the garage.
They also plan to build a room addition to square off the back of the house. In addition,
they hope to construct a patio behind the house to replace the patio which will be covered
by the room addition.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The applicant's lot is only 50 feet
wide and they want to maximize the amount of intact open space in the rear yard. In
addition, they believe the required 5 foot , setback would make maneuvering into the garage
awkward since more of the garage would be behind the house.
Staff notes that garages on abutting properties are very close to the side lot lines. However,
such narrow side yards create spaces that are difficult to maintain. The applicant is also
proposing to place a fence along the lot line.. The remaining spaca between the fence and
the garage will be less than two feet. The proposed 2 foot sideyard is less than 50% of the
required 5 foot standard.
Staff believes that the narrow lot width does impose a hardship, since the setback standards
relate to the standard 65 foot lot width. However, the degree of non -conformity should be
minimized whenever possible. Accordingly,, staff suggests that the sideyard be increased to
three feet which would be less than a 50% variation. Staff believes that a three foot setback
would make maintenance easier and not significantly reduce the usable rear yard space.
The applicant's lot is smaller than current standards allow (7,514 sq. ft. vs. 8,125 sq. ft.).
Consequently, the potential for excessive lot coverage is greater. The relatively long length
of the lot results in the need for a long driveway, and therefore more pavement, The
driveway could be shortened by locating the garage closer to the house. However, the
garage would then be in the middle of the lot reducing the apparent openness of the back
yard.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
Staff notes that the Floor Area Ratio is well below the maximum allowed, which suggests
that the size of the house is appropriate to the lot size. Staff' also notes that even if the
patio was eliminated, a lot coverage variation would be necessary.
MER VILIAGE SIAEE COMMENTS
The Engineering Department notes that no Village utilities exist in the side or rear
easements. A grading plan must be submitted for review and downspouts on the garage
should be directed toward the front yard.
Inspection Services suggests that the fence should be placed 6" above grade to allow
unrestricted drainage underneath.
Staff notes that the lot is narrow and undersized, which contributes to the need for
variances. Staff has no objection to the proposed six foot fence or 52.6% lot coverage. Staff
also supports a sideyard variation, but recommends that the setback be increased to 3 feet
rather than the 2 feet proposed.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 18, 1991 W(-
-SUBJECT- ZBA-15-V-91, ZBA-I6-SU-91, NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD
LOCATION: 900 NORTH WOLF ROAD
The Zoning Board of Appeals I transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for variances and a Special Use permit filed by Northwest Assembly of God.
The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of a new
sanctuary dome and required parking:
1. Section 14.1102.E. to allow lot coverage of 62% instead of 35% permitted.
2. Section 14.1004.A. to allow a 50 foot dome building height instead of 28 ft. maximum
height permitted.
3. Section 14.3017 to allow 8.5 ft. wide parking stalls instead of 9 ft. permitted width.
The applicant is also requesting a Special Use permit per Section 14.1001.C.6 to allow a
garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of March 14, 1991.
At the meeting Greg Gann, Attorney for the petitioner, presented an overview of the
application. He also presented a brief history of a previous similar request made by
Northwest Assembly of God last year (ZBA-31-V-90) on the Ministry Center site. He
indicated that over the last several months, Northwest Assembly of God has engaged in
negotiations with River Trails Park District regarding a potential land exchange. As
proposed, the church would exchange the Ministry Center property for the existing Sycamore
Trails Park property. This would allow the church to consolidate it's property on the corner
and shift the park closer to residents. A 70 foot wide strip of land on the north side of the
existing Sycamore. Trails Park would be deeded to the Park District to provide public access
between the relocated park and River Trails Jr. High School. Mr. Gann also indicated that
the church held 4 meetings with surrounding neighbors during the last two weeks to explain
the current proposal and to address their concerns.
Mr. Gann proceeded to introduce the individuals retained by the Church to provide expert
testimony regarding the proposal.
Robert Maddox, Pastor for Northwest Assembly of God, explained the details of the
proposed church expansion project and expected seating capacity needs.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
March 18, 1991
Robert Campbell, 5 South Maple
of community benefits derived frc
to the community.
Steve Olson, Architect, exj
applicable Village Codes. I
ft. from the nearest home.
220 ft. He indicated that
Instead, the parking lot is (
Street, a church member, presented testimony in support
n Northwest Assembly's programs and their commitment
all the site plans submitted, confirming that they meet
noted that at the closest point, the parking lot will be 80
landbanking, is in effect, the distance will be increased to
of the landscaped areas would be used for detention.
d to function at a detention area.
associates, Real Estate Consultants, presented testimony
;ed development with the Village's Comprehensive Plan.
aracteristics of 22 other church developments in Mount
)rthwest Assembly proposal was consistent with those
age. He also stated that he believed the current proposal,
ted in a better site plan and arrangement of land -uses in
and approved last Spring.
Robert Hamilton of Gewalt Hamilton Associates, engineers, explained the design of the
storm management and detention system He also explained the traffic study prepared by
Gewalt, Hamilton Associates. He noted that peak church traffic occurs at different times
than regular neighborhood traffic, e.g. Sunday mornings and Wednesday evening.
He also stated that it would
a typical service. He briefly
be sharp cut-off fixtures appr
church use.
David Clements, Director of Pla
requests individually. He stated
zoning standards are designed t,
percentage of lot coverage allows
and storm water management.
detention is required. He indica
and storm water management, t
With regard to the 50 foot dome
out of scale due to the large siz
Mr. Clements stated that 8.5 ft. j
over is low, such as commuter
somewhat different in nature an
attempt to park side-by-side at
He stated that the land exchanj
of God. The Park District ga
residents. The church would b
is located on the comer of two
iximately 30 minutes to empty the parking lot after
iing and Zoning, explained the variances and Special Use
tat the RA Zoning District permits churches, but that the
accommodate typical residential development. The low
I reflects developments that don't require on-site detention
Commercial districts allow 750/w lot coverage because
-d that the church is required to provide on-site detention
d that the proposed lot caveragevas reasonable.
eight, Mr. Clements stated that the dome does not appear
of the lot and the ample setbacks.
Aing stalls are currently allowed in situations where turn-
Dts or office buildings. He indicated that the church is
the narrow spaces could result in inconvenience if persons
ie same time.
benefits both the Park District and Northwest Assembly
s about one acre of land and will be located closer to
able to consolidate their facilities:on one property which
rterial streets which should facilitate accessibility.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 3
March 18, 1991
About 25 people were present in the audience to hear the testimony. No one objected to
the proposal. Larry Hageman. 1305 Ironwood stated support for the new proposal and
commended Northwest Assembly on their efforts to share information with the
neighborhood.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the request raising questions about the proposed
land exchange and seating capacity.
Peter Lannon expressed concern about the amount of development proposed for the
property.
In general, the Zoning Board believed that the new proposal successfully addressed the
concerns expressed by neighbors over the previous site plan presented last Spring. They
agreed the land "change would benefit the community.
Accordingly by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of appeals recommends approval of the
following variations:
1. Section 14.1102.E. to allow lot coverage of 62% instead of 35% permitted.
2. Section 14.1004.A. to allow a 50 foot dome building height instead of 28 ft. maximum
height permitted.
3. Section 14.3017 to allow 8.5 ft. wide parking stalls instead of 9 ft. permitted width.
Also, by a 7-0 vote the Zoning Board of appeals recommends approval of a Special Use
permit to allow a garage designed to house more than two motor vehicles as presented on
the site plan submitted.
DMC:hg
—ev
a
It
e i
0
U
M
w ..r.N
PARKINC DATA
Now No 0 moommmmmmmANA04M
saesxrcm- �tt+:�rrc^w m
G•b!
� � ems' - l��` .,•.. .
%TlnrnMN
zn=—�
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR -MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 15-V-91
Hearing Date: March 14, 1991
16 -SU -91
PETITIONER:
Northwest Assembly of God
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
900 N. Wolf Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 26, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.1002.E. to allow lot coverage
of 62% instead of 35% permitted.
Section 14.1004.A to allow a 50'
dome building height instead of
28' maximum building height
permitted. Section 14.3017 to
allow 8.5' wide parking stalls
instead of the 9' permitted
width.
Special Use permit per Section
14.1001.C.6. to allow a garage
deigned to house more then two
motor vehicles.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronalr', Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT:
"or, e
OBJFCTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Full Audience
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.100,2.E.
to allow lot coverage of 62% instead of 35% permitted.
Section 14.1004.A to allow a 50' dome building height instea(i
of 28' maximum building height permitted. Section 14.3017 to
allow 8.5' gide parking stalls instead of the 9' permitted
The applicant is also requesting a Special Use permit per
Section 14.1001.C.6. to allow a garage designed to house
more than tt,7(-) motor vehicles.
�f
16 -SU -91
h lh, 1991
Pf 2 of 7
Gregory Gann, attorne rep esenting, Northwzr --Qly of
God, presented :the caf,e stating that theiretif oner#was
bef-Dre the Zoning Boa d of appeals last sp "I,6 ith a
similar proposal for Che property- known a 1 �r Kens:ington
Rd. `1r. Gann stated t at the Zoning Boar de ,� the request
t�hich t,:as overturned �y 'the Village Board of °iastees and
was granted. Qrdinance,,number 4218,
The Church decided toldzso`uss c�ith the Riser 'ils;Park
District >a pos ibl.e 1 ,ni sj; cahi;c is presera r � in exhibit
fcve, Mr. Gann, stat %that" t4,, ghuroh has, le�� authority to
represent this ,parbel Ot 1, n witch is Iapate�� n the corner
of Wolf and iaerwsa;gta loafs iarr Caann stated hat contingent
on the land exr,,hange,, `S:V moa Trails Parr wc+ r be located
where the old"Feehan�.*j�lle School, is which i rrently the
church's min`stry cen er. The terms from the rk district
include that t"he chur'h maintatn the trees t���e West of the
proposed church, pay. or tie park to be reloc� d and develop
and furnish the park >it accessories, nr n stated that
this Public hearing a being held with the asmption of the
land exchange: but not d that this is not a fa' ' yet,
Mr. Gunn stated that be senior"pastor for t" Wllbhurdh held a
meeting with neighbor to'the north and crest %fiey sent out
150 invitations and ocl y 50 residents attende'0!Those
attending expressed s�"tIsfacticn with the pro sal. `'"`1r. Gann
stated that 50 invites =xons x=ere sent out to tom„0, neighbors to
the East noting that a res�.derts. showed. Mr 11' also
stated that a meetin-Occas `held with the Park j- strict and no
objections were made.",
Mr. Gann then went; though the application pa�ge presented
to the Board members nd also through the prci��,s ed site plan.
The site plan was dra -n per A,iIlag Crdinancg' l d shows:
access to both: Wolf` avid lensing n, ,Pals. Mr 'nn noted that
two exits are provide] onto Kensington with t� third onto
Wolf Road. He also no ed that F. 70' strip of �nd no -th of
the parking lot would V'""b Leta i ned by the park d would
the impact, o the o a�r"z on ad pr cOn',i es idents.
&r. Gann stated drat `q vat..ir4nere revues lr% for setbacks
and, the number' of pa � t l "l s provided, me Code .
IN,
"fir. Gann "tate�l th=at � "i;s prig.„gaa�,*ai �waS,l iwe b ' �icial to the
re.szdent�.s aeA tct the�lurrz, ;,ylr r"i�� n n -”, d t '`t the churc
has been 'tn "h -is "o 11 ni.t f o r 20 F:, -s and K� Id like to
-ta." ar�d C� .'�"" `.h_.x raef�rhbracs a�r� sat.; sfied w� the""proposal
ZBA-15-V-91
ZBA-16-SU-91
March 14, 1991
Page 3 of 7
Mr. Gann then introduced the pastor of the church,
Re%-erend S. Robert Maddox.
Reverend Maddox stated that he has been newly appointed to
the Northwest Assembly of God Church. He stated that the
church provides many programs which are very beneficial to
the community of,Mount Prospect. Reverend Maddox continued
stating thRt the church has been there since 1969 and would
like to stay on the corner of Kensington And Wolf Roads.
Reverend Maddox then stated that the new church would be
constructed in three phases.
Phase I.- Construct an addition to the eHisting church
building to eNpand the Christian education facility.
kdditional parking will be constructed as needed to
meet Code requirements.
Phase 2- rl',;nstruct the ground floor of the sanctuary which
will have a seating capacity of 1,400. Additional
parking will be constructed to achieve a total of
583 spaces. Landbanking of 171 parking spaces is
I -quested to defer construction of these parking
,spaces until the final building phase is complete.
Phase 3- 'onstruct a prayer chapel and balcony seating for
100 people in the sanctuary. Additional 171 parking
stall will be constructed to increase parking to the
754 spaces required by "ode.
Robert Campbell of 5 So. Maple and also a member of the
church, stated that he has lived in Mount Prospect for 4
years and has been 'with the church for 8 years. Mr. Campbell
stated that the new church would I)e a benefit to the
community and feels Mount Prospe,_-t is Northwest Assembly of
God's home. Mr. Campbell stated he understands the neighbors
concerns and feels the new prop -sal r.-.th the land exchange
allows the park to serve as a to the residents.
Steven Olsen, architect for Nnrth(,est Assembly of God, stated
that the proposed church conforms to the Village's setback
requirements, parking lot and handicapped parking
requirements and also the landscape ordinance. Mr. Olsen
stated that he worked with the traffic consultant regarding
the ingress and egress onto Kensington and Wolf Roads. The
site plan includes a stacking r,)w on the north side of the
property. Mr. Olsen stated tha=t the landscaping plan
conforms to the Village Code and will be more extensive
thar required near residents on the north and west sides of
the property. Mr. Olsen stated that the nearest resident wi',l
be 370' east of the proposed chr:rrh which is across Wolf
Road- The homes to the north will be about 100' from the
church and 80' from the parking 1(,,t. "Ir. Olsen stated that
1
is
-15-V-91
_16 -;ST: -91
ch 14, 1991
e 4 lo f 7
with the landbanking h distance to the park -$ lot would
increase to about 220 Mr. Olsen stated that,. he trees on
the west side of the roperty will remain foi��rmrni'mum of
ten years as agreed ''r �th the Park District 'n h9 tt_at the
church has no plans t remove them,after ten ears.''�r. Olsen
stated that there is ���' proposed 16CYO sq. "t ��age `to be
� is , � �u
located at the south nd of the property at t edge of
the tree line, �1r. Laraian r� .totsP.d thexet;�i of the
garage. Mr. Olsen, s ated t ,t� the �gara e w� �b'e a one-
f ;
story building with a'll bl
9ae or hap roof. ]
,,ray
Marvin Bailey, real t ,te and '1 „a e icap ent co i�ultan.t for
"northwest Assembly" of � ed , st atrem3 thatr he, 44a ked to
evaluate the os dm' at � i t '��i"th, the mprehensive
p f p" l p
Plan, Mr. Bailey .ata that re f list. fucose � the
characteristic's of, th ne g'htsor ood» Mr. Baal � stated that
there is .a high o=l m ,f to ff �c on the trio tern roads.
Mr. Bailey noted tKa hh i S, a 'permitt`� ; use, in a R -X
cane ,and: has 1a en th _e for Z c al;s, Mr. B icy stated that
this site plan prefee wirasa pr���al on
ika�ns d nt. a Road Mr. ''Rall i� t erg that he rveyed the lot
c,ov. Mrage for 22 e isttn churches in the tel ,r,e of 'Mount
Prospert. �7r. fiaile ' 't°ated Cf tMe-se 'urches e--cee(:
J 11 11
the 35 lot coverage `,n'd feels 10t O,CiVPra'oi� for%the
pr opo,sed hur &h a s p list n g"�
»ether a hue' 'es in the
area. sir, Bailey, sts4 a1, that the ria dship f"or� �e church is
that the Village oo Sa s rv6tt�, ra o,6gna e off � �txeet"°parl�ing
requirements for etre ri`r^ r lough x't r ' permitted
use. ""r. Dail* st;atthai t.h asrtratr��rircuiation
improved on this prop, a]. be 6awu f the "log* ;L,`;'on at a major
intersection. , Th4 p a d crquaa k..ic5n shb ; not increaF,.,
the traffic in the �a ec as ;p�v, i ho a h`sr� ,l,�°� operat i
do not correspond tai 6)MEA, P� ; � rn area..
,
Ira addition the chums n,.i +,�a a*ay ,�rhLn
-.ari.atons.AM
�` Y t,i CiII *aot%
"fir. Bailey stated th he feel, � ate an ad��er. ��
effect on the- area a is vers wi',the
neighborhood. Mr. Bailey sta »ed th„t real est, e value in
neighborhood will n be ngat^ 1 ; ^Gt acted the
development.
Mr. Lannon questioneM i` ho,,,w mattt",hu ashes exbEe, "the 3,5% lct
coc-erage in the V l'l a, Mr. Bir If"' stat€'d t��17 chrarchr .
eyceed the 35% recjux "apnt art rrrg th tit 6 eX� � 64V' Nhich
higher than the 6p%-pposed t''t church Bailey st a`
that the 1900 seatspose f";ar the noes churl Lnci e ases
required parking lot ize � h,,,1 (h�th leo .ov F_'r agt
_ cif
ZBA-15-V-91
ZBA-16-SU-91
March 11, 1991
Page 5 of 7
Robert Hamilton, of Gewalt, Hamilton kssociate,s, traffic
expert stated that he prepared a traffic analysis from the
ergini-er.g site plan. Mr. Hamilton stated that the proposed
:Ilur:-h parking 'Int will provide three, three -lane access
-'r-*%-�tyays. He indicated that approximately 1/3 of the church
bound traffic will come from the west. Mr. Hamilton stated
that the level of service is ranked according to National
Standards of traffic control. The newly reconstructed
intersection at Wolf and Kensington Rds. was designed to
operate at level of service B which is sufficient to
acc;mmr:,date the proposed development. The peak hours of the
church are on Sunday morning j,Thiich Is different than normal
neighbor peak traffic. Mr. Hamilton stated that if evervone
left at once the parking lot wnulcl Pmpt.-,- out in about Ib
minutes, othert:ise an average of 30 minutes would'be required
to empty the lot.
`-fr. flamil-Inn stated that the existing water supply consists
of an 8" water main which belongs to Citizen's Utilities.
I!r. Hamilton stated that the VJJII.age Engineer suggested to
connect to the water main located on Kensington Road and
to Village water. Mr. Hamilton stated that will be
the (hurrhes decision. Mr. Hamilton stated that the sanitar�-
spt.er will be connected with Citizens Utilities. He noted
that the parking lot is designed to function as a storm water
detention area. Lighting for the parking lot will consist of
20' high light poles on a 2 1/2' pedestal, which are being
provided for security reasons. The light fixture that will ',F-
used is known as a sharp cut-off ri:'-ure t,:hich reflects the
light down and causes no glare abn%e or to the sides. He als,
indicated that lights would onl�- be used during evening
church functions.
NTr. Lannon questioned when the IL,.-aff'c study was clone.
Hamilton stated that the study c:as clone in January after tI.-
nec, building was occupied.
Mr. Gann moved all items into ,-Idern.-e.
T)a,, id, (71 - ei,,ients, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated thal
pz-nposal is simi.lar to the pr,-,, ou,, proposal of last year.
The prol"nsed lot -overage will be at a maximum of 62% ,
',fr. rlements stated that the primary reason for lot covera-g
requirements is to regulate storm vater. run-off. Resident!.�'
properties are not require] to provide storm water managerm-,
s�-stems and I -herefore need. to rF�tain a relatively large
Th, urch is n. differen.t
amounts of impervious surface. - r 'I-iX
of development and is require,' I,- provide and is required
prn%ide nn- ite 5tnrm crater det(--ntion. The 50' dome height
I RNA
t
f
f-IaAu. 91
ch 14 1991
e 6 of 7
request is due to the I'jigavage
iameter and span of th"�"omew Mr.C Cements stated that e church will be aboa t%� 0' away from
ansingle-family ham� The whichs i ' old church
vehicles, will be in' isolsted area andwill� at have 'an
Empac t of any single- Yamily homes, j
Mr. Pratt asked if th i land exchange will ors'a � a hardship
for the Park District t far. Claments' stated th �Ae feels thr
exchange will be bene a iril to both tho t, turd"I "nrl
residents by consolid 'ting the 6hurch on the nerand�
shifting the park ?1a to the residents
Larry- Hageman of 1305 ironwood, stated that W'' nei.hbars are
satisfied with the pr'ipcisal.
Mr. Cassidy rluestione f ghat will be doneith///je Fe'ehanville
School, Mr. Gann stat Z. that the church :ill �nollah and
excavate the parcel 'o land and rebuild the „k.
The Board then genera'011' loss usied the propo 41 Mr ;Lannon
stated `haat the churc' is creating dts own M, h1p and feels
t APR anneed 190a neat. 'fir, ; Pratt stated."N at he is in
favor of the pr�ohcsal �Mrs. Skoawron comment'`on T1s
L..ann:;n'F-`atement ^ t %ting "that the' church ha s right to
prepare for future, gr'Wth. 'sir. t.anron stated �at he is in
rivnr of the proposal lbut would prefer -140D W-uts as in the
p e nus proposal noting that adding 500 seat r ncreases the
lot coverage. 'sir. La Won stated he is cancer "'!about over-
building of the land..''
Chairman Basnik then entertained a'motion'to'nt the
petitioners request fAir variations from: MM
1. Section 14.10Q .E. to allow int cover of 62%
instead of 35V,rpermitted.
2. Section' 14.100 ;. A. to allot; a5 ' dome ,� ilding he:g!:'
instead of 28 7 1maximum bu i l l i ng he ight�ermined .
o/
3. Section14.301 to allnT 8 is' wide pari Ing stalls
instead of the permitted width.
"r. Brett.ragermored '+iz^s. Brothers seconded
UPON ROLL CALL: A"YES.% Lanzifni Pratt, Brother s/Ej assidyt
M %"
flirett`rager Skoawron, $jik
�j
NAVY "None
`lotion carried by a %1to of
l
Chairman L3nsn"k thpn ntertai~+,A. `s s?ir*.ican '"ra ant the
1
ZBA-15-V-91
ZBA-16-SU-91
March 14, 1991
Page 7 of 7
r,que.,;;,t for a Special Use permit per Section
14,1001.C.6 to allow a garage designed to house more than tt,:o
motor vehicles.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYFS: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Brffttra.ger, Skowron, Lannon
`;SYS: None
Motion carried by a Vote of 7-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
M
FROM:
DATE:
CASE NO.:
APPLICANT:
ADDRESS:
LOCATION MAP:
0
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
MARCH 7, I"l
ZBA.15.V.91, ZBA-16-SU-91
NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD
900 NORTH WOLF ROAD
144
FEE
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION -
ZONING: R -X, Single Family Residential (large lot)
LOT SIZE: 11.2208 Acres (proposed)
% COVERAGE: 62% (proposed)
F.A.R.: N.A.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals . Page 2
REQIUEST
The application was filed to allow construction of a 1,900 seat sanctuary for Northwest
Assembly of God. Church.
Last spring, Northwest Assembly of God presented a proposal for a new church sanctuary
and associated parking on the site of the Northwest Ministry Center, formerly the home of
Feehanville School. This earlier request raised several concerns with the surrounding
property owners:
- Close proximity of the church and parking lot to residents' homes;
- Increased traffic congestion in the neighborhood;
- Time required to empty the parking lot;
- Environmental factors, such as noise, parking lot lighting, and exhaust from idling
cars as the parking lot abutted a number of homes.
While the variances requested were approved by the Village Board, the church decided not
to proceed with their development on the ministry center site. Instead, they chose to
investigate the possibility of exchanging land with River Trails Park District which would
allow the church to expand on their comer property and shift ithe park closer to the
residents.
The current proposal is based on the proposed land exchange with the Park District.
According to the, land exchange, the church would trade. the ministry center site for the
current Sycamore Trails Park As a result, Sycamore Trails Park would be shifted to the
west, nearer to residents, and Northwest Assembly of God property, would be consolidated
on the northwest comer of Kensington and Wolf Roads. A strip of land 70 feet wide on the
north side of the existing Sycamore Trails Park would be retained;by the Park District to
provide public access between the relocated park and River Trails Junior High School. This
will also function as an additional buffer between residents and the new church.
Summary of application: Northwest Assembly of God is proposing to construct:
1. An addition to the existing church facility on the comer of Kensington and Wolf
Roads 1
2. A new sanctuary with a potential maximum seating capacity for 1,900 people. The
sanctuary dome is proposed to be 50 feet in height at the highest point.
3. A prayer chapel.
4. Parking lot for 754 vehicles as required by the Zoning Ordinance.
This development is scheduled to occur in three phases, as follows:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals,. Page 3
phase 1. construct an addition to the existing church building to expand the Christian
Education facility. Additional parking will be constructed as needed to meet Code
requirements.
Phase I Construct the ground floor of the sanctuary which will have a seating capacity of
1,400. Additional parking will be constructed to achieve a total of 583 spaces.
Landbanking of 171 parking spaces is requested to defer construction of these
parking spaces until the final building phase is complete.
Phase 3: Construct a prayer chapel and balcony seating for 500 people in the sanctuary.
Additional 171 parking stalls will be constructed to increase parking to the 764
spaces required by Code.
The development currently proposed is very similar to that initially proposed last spring on
the ministry center site. The proposed land exchange and current development proposal
attempt to address the major concerns expressed by the surrounding neighborhood regarding
the former development plan.
The land exchange will result in the church property being consolidated into a contiguous
11.22 acre site on the northwest comer of Kensington and Wolf Roads. This site is
approximately 2.15 acres larger than the ministry center site. Relocating the church
development to the comer site significantly reduces its impact on the residents simply
bemuse of the greater physical separation. The park will serve as a buffer between the
church and residents. In addition, the proposed park location is more directly accessible to
surrounding residents.
The corner location will allow ingress and egress to the church property from two arterial
roads. Ibis should improve internal parking lot circulation and reduce the time required
to empty the lot. The greater distance between the church development and residents
would eliminate any potential negative environmental factors, such as noise, vehicle exhaust
and light spillover from the parking lot.
The development plan proposed by the petitioner requires four variations and one special
use permit These are described individually below.
1. LQt QyS= Variation: The proposed lot coverage is at 62% which is well above
the 35% maximum allowed in the R -X District. Staff notes that churches and other
institutions are permitted uses in all residential districts. However, the lot coverage
standard was designed to reflect typical single family residential development, where
on-site detention and storm management systems are not required. In residential
developments, it is desirable for more than half of the lot area to remain pervious
to accommodate run-off and prevent flooding rather than require on-site detention
for individual lots.
Lot coverage of up to, 75% is allowed for commercial and industrial uses. An
institutional use, such as a church, falls somewhere between residential scale
development and more intense commercial developments. As such, lot coverage of
62% does not seem unreasonable for this use, provided adequate detention is
provided. The church is required by code to provide on-site detention and a storm
management system. Preliminary engineering has been submitted.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4
The petitioner is also r uesting to landbank 171 parking! spaces until the final
2. Hcight of Sag== po=: The proposed sanctuary is circular with a domed roof.
At the highest point, the dome is 50 feet tall. The Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance limits the height of structures in the R -X District'lo 28 feet. Again, the
height standard was designed with typical residential structures in mind. The
proposed sanctuary is very large. The height of the dome relates to the diameter of
the sanctuary and the span of the roof. The new location, further from residential
structures, diminishes tithe apparent difference in scale. In addition, the lot is larger
than the previous development site, further reducing the impact of the dome height.
3. Reduced Parking Stall %dth: The proposed site plan illustrates 550 of the 754
parking stalls 8.5 feet wide rather than 9 feet as required by Code. Narrower parking
stalls are justified in situations where turn -over is relatively low. The petitioner
believes that people will,come and go from the parking stalls at regular intervals
(before and after services). Traffic in the parking lot during church services is
expected to be relatively minor.
The proposed site plan indicates a maximum total of 754 parking stalls which is the
minimum required to accommodate this facility. Smaller stalls obviously require less
overall pavement. Accordingly, constructing all 9 foot stalls would increase the lot
coverage or result in the deed for a parking variation.
4. YWve RgQuired Loadipa UM: Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires one
loading space for a facility of this size. It is unlikely that the church will require
equipment or supplies that would be delivered by a semi -truck. The petitioner does
not anticipate a need for a loading space and is requesting that the requirement be
waived. Staff has no ob ons to the request.
5. rwgjal Use J!ermit: The,petitioner is also proposing to construct a garage to house
up to four church vehicles and other maintenance equipment, Oversized garages are
considered special uses. " The garage will be located at the western edge of the
parking lot near the grove of trees. This location meets all "required setbacks. The
trees will screen it from the park.
QMIER VILLAGE STAFF
Many of the comments from other staff relate to issues that will be addressed during
building and engineering, plan review. Briefly, these include:
. Submission of full building and engineering plans for review,
I
- Detention for all landbanked areas must be installed as each area is developed.
Gil Basnik„ Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page S
I.D.O.T. permit is required for access onto Kensington Road and potentially Wolf
Road depending on when the Village takes jurisdictional transfer of Wolf Road.
The Fire Department requests that the entrance portico provide a minimum of 14
feet to allow fire equipment clearance.
Additional street trees are required.
A Plat of Subdivision is required.
A change in Comprehensive Plan is required to redesignate open space and
institutional land -use designation as a result of the land exchange.
Staff believes that the current proposal to develop the corner site addresses the major
concerns expressed relative to the previous development. The proposed land exchange
results in a better overall distribution of uses. The large church development will be
concentrated at the intersection of two arterial roads, and the relocated park will serve as
a buffer between the church and residential development. Also with this plan, the park site
is more accessible to residents.
While the church is a permitted use in the R -X District, the bulk of the standards (including
lot coverage) are not designed to realistically accommodate institutional development.
Because the church is required to provide on-site detention and storm management, a higher
lot coverage is justified. Likewise, a church is a very different building type than a
residential home. They must accommodate large numbers of people. Churches are typically
quite tall for symbolic reasons.
In summary, staff has no objections to the variations and special use requested, and
recommends approval of the application. The proposed plan substantially addresses issues
from last year's public hearing, with the added benefit of a better located park site.
DMC:hg
SPILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Mt
1
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MARCH 21, 1991
SUBJECT: WAL-MART SUBDIVISION
930 EAST MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA
The applicant, Wal-Mart Corporation, is requesting that a single lot subdivision be created
for commercial use for their Wal-Mart Store. Staff would note that the applicant appeared
before the Plan Commission on September 5, 1990 to seek Development Code modifications
for street lighting and location of detention facilities. The Plan Commission approved the
installation of street lighting at a later time, with a provision that a restrictive covenant be
signed to ensure their installation, and approved the width of detention facilities from
structures of 60 feet.
Staff would note that the site is zoned B-3 Business Retail and Services, and that a 114,513
square foot retail store will be constructed on the 9.1 acre lot. ne site is almost entirely
surrounded by other commercial uses and business zoning districts. The exception to this
is Centennial Apartments, the Senior Citizen Housing project, located immediately east of
the site. Access to the store will be from the main entrance into Mount Prospect Plaza at
the signalized intersection of Mount Prospect Road and Rand Road and from the northwest
corner of the site at Rand Road.
The Plan Commission heard this item during their regular meeting on Wednesday, March
20, 1991 and originally voted 4-2 on the issue. The subdivision failed with this vote. The
two commissioners voting nay on the issue explained that they felt access and egress routes
are inadequate and unsafe. Mr. Boege said he voted no because the site plan would
discontinue the egress road onto Rand Road at the south end of the site. Mr. Breitsameter
then moved to reconsider the issue. This was seconded by Mrs. Luxem. The vote to
reconsider passed by a vote of 6-0.
A motion was then made to approve the Wal-Mart subdivision plat. This was approved
by a vote of 5-0 with one pass. With the pass vote going with the majority, the final vote
on the subdivision plat is 6-0. Staff had no objections to the approval of this subdivision.
DMC:hg
*OSTM ut or sa M/+ Of sr VT or f[ofs-a w V PL -1V1 rs! \ 1 . ) UOUI V I.7 / ul V
K{l [pl[II Q 10t # t3' EAKwoml f0[ C0I 19KM DOW a 0- KU &.SI PMT Of
P % tt.�[!#ws 1000 Na 3."7 t) LOT / a P! TYA 3YBF
O1fM$10$
U0M r![ f IACAi[0 #M Almry. PY LOOM
oft
wm
1991
l 1 •* [TT RS n i`AKr I
1 , Y
t `
WOVE !1 1
ANT • '
[t [ ca
fA1o"T i00C-a fIaTA1
1 su"I fan FOR *NrAm
t :(!� g} t # :0°pu�tE[gw"w as [ [twos #
YAof ft.1 of wowe" <R (tom.' NOeIT[# T i --4{
♦ 1 GHO - 70 K vACAR6
1
` i
SSS #[' f rma, 3toor
OMF
t 1 a Ku =i1
PA➢.•MTY tE[RfOT[Y
-f
• sT Tow* _ . 1
wwv
a Kl TR IYY `A 1
p Ttr e/T fA i'.� F . ,rte 01
CENTENNI,
RECORDED 2/11/1
.[sl —f Or
etua x s#Mlat.".
PAOf0 [P0.us+`A
s GAY X.E. [AYM[M
PI
AIOlf Pw
SOUTHWEST CORNEA OF
E MWEHYAL WMAPON
PA0POWD 20' EXCtu9#[ , [A%W
1Alvft— E.sbK"T
• >
#.aye_
`�
'�.L x
+ i"IA 1
_ _ _ ... — —
"Wow +t
?0, I;TtMi7[
tif.# _ k In
iaw
1
riT,�
NPOTES:
\\
♦= ri.^ y{*fT[EFx
T €I PO0,O90 f0' ET#[UY S t
` TNAltl tO aBf XMa � � � [POUT Ytoo
[N[tMl KPitt [AT[i1HM#
'C
#r.+tkf[ ro n+sT.le wstAET.
\ `
to €"llfaT
- +YMRS AETIT tdM• #T� A f6. �Q
f wMA[[ Of 0lPPl.OS a.1ifi vocoo T#' [01Mtt fH # :CAfs
4#•fi �
€aOC NQ #4@Il7[} 1
a1 iTM*am"
K U(C'¶TIIKP LATHY f. ttNf #10 V -T #A
tTC2Mf. to PILIIlE Kfl.+t[ TA�MONItI![tM a[rNOA
� \
�
—• _ — — •— 1 ®• —
_ ,®
R f ♦ fai PKTMf
�— _ _ — _ _ _ _
1
O a
fi
s[iMCR Y� i
CENTENNI,
RECORDED 2/11/1
.[sl —f Or
etua x s#Mlat.".
PAOf0 [P0.us+`A
s GAY X.E. [AYM[M
PI
AIOlf Pw
SOUTHWEST CORNEA OF
E MWEHYAL WMAPON
PA0POWD 20' EXCtu9#[ , [A%W
1Alvft— E.sbK"T
co+ran. -w
Ia A .twol
Ind. aq.cflr .uw+
c«uucibn MU sr«1+.
4d+. iN +IY\ Ruth
M dq.d F,
.p Tm t
o asap � Mn
{ oP«#X #pqup
U+ pq«tY
A#K « i.N+i# IM +text
bto..mow+� rs
4.R TUMI.
[Frii000 to#A#M « 1
exUa #.. 4@ttp
e �wltl«+ mn..ni 1
H+e +IU U+ pq
a all M, f02[.}. +
at[Nas - 3 t1OV$ M. ♦+"tn "� ..tib ;
u.qq, R w Taw+[ TMMI' AI+A .
We TiY #rMlwgt 41 r Ti iR++..Tatlt#nn
+PNTw.•/#TA n..rw. +au.lt ..P t# w a
1/p so At Ki SA eaa. +.r ar w
�x
l�
1
GOVERNMENT AND UTIIITT JFFICIAIS
%%tow Or M1, P*OWEcT CONUO..EAL1N EOsOM COMPANY
./ )D' SCINA t
1 «^
JAW ![.QTMM1► O.Y. ovel."
1001-1.0— '201 Y. At.r A...
ta0 [#..r+Pn if- Yl h.MPa[t, i t00st
S' PI/NLMf
\ ♦
L
7
TO
[ #WTt: ACC[7f TIKt [IYlOYIO[O O
PACO S L At AS P[ 40Tvto
K tulMpt KMATWXY OF
«# P+s+ese+ ! iOpli (100)X70 -if it
SIDEWKN
g=T
Z y^
TMIAr"TaT#ON.
CASEMENT•
O a
fi
co+ran. -w
Ia A .twol
Ind. aq.cflr .uw+
c«uucibn MU sr«1+.
4d+. iN +IY\ Ruth
M dq.d F,
.p Tm t
o asap � Mn
{ oP«#X #pqup
U+ pq«tY
A#K « i.N+i# IM +text
bto..mow+� rs
4.R TUMI.
[Frii000 to#A#M « 1
exUa #.. 4@ttp
e �wltl«+ mn..ni 1
H+e +IU U+ pq
a all M, f02[.}. +
at[Nas - 3 t1OV$ M. ♦+"tn "� ..tib ;
u.qq, R w Taw+[ TMMI' AI+A .
We TiY #rMlwgt 41 r Ti iR++..Tatlt#nn
+PNTw.•/#TA n..rw. +au.lt ..P t# w a
1/p so At Ki SA eaa. +.r ar w
DJ/caf
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8
OF THE VILL-AGE CODE OF MO PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,. COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Chapter 8 entitled "Village Government
Miscellaneous Provisions" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto Article XII
entitled "Hotel/Motel Use Tax" ; so that hereinafter said Article
XII of Chapter 8 shall be and read as follows:
ARTICLE XII
HOTEL/MOTEL USE TAX
SECTION:
8.1201.
Purpose
8.1202.
Imposition of Tax
8.1203.
Payment and Collection
8.1204.
Administration and Enforcement
8.1205.
Interest and Penalties.
8.1206.
Transmittal of Tax Collection
8.1207.
License Suspension, Revocation
8.1208.
Violations
See. 8.1201. Purpose. A Hotel/Motel Use Tax is established for
the purpose of providing a source of funding for
events which benefit the entire community.
Sec. 8.1202. Imposition of tax. A Hotel/Motel Use Tax is hereby
imposed upon all licensees, as provided in Article
XVII of Chapter 11 of this Village Code, for the use and privilege
of renting, leasing or letting of rooms in a hotel or motel in the
Village of Mount Prospect at a rate of three percent (30) of the
gross rental receipts from such rental, leasing or letting. The
ultimate incidence of any liability for payment of said tax shall
be borne by the user, lessee or tenant or said rooms. The
Hotel/Motel User Tax shall be in addition to any and all other
taxes imposed by the Village of Mount Prospect, State of Illinois,
or by any municipal corporation or political subdivision thereof.
Sec. 8.1203. Payment and Collection. The owner and/or operator
of each hotel and/or motel and the person to whom the
license to operate shall have been issued, as required in Article
XVII of Chapter 11 of this Code, shall bear jointly and severally
the duty to collect the tax from each user, lessee, or tenant of
rooms in such hotel or motel. Every person required to collect the
tax as provided herein shall secure said tax from the user, lesser
or tenant of a room or rooms at the time he collects the price,
charge, or rent to which is applies.
See. 8.1204. Administration and Enforcement officer. The Finance
Director of the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby
designated as the Administration and Enforcement officer of this
Hotel/Motel Use Tax on behalf of the Village. It shall be the
responsibility and duty of the Finance Director to collect all
amounts due to the Village from the owners, operators and/or
licensees of hotels and motels in the Village.
Chapter 8
Hotel/Motel Use Tax
Page 2 of 3
on a monthly basis a �
shall be filed by eact
Finance Director of thf
all receipts from each
said month. The dates
filed shall be establi,
Each such return shall
all. taxes due and ow:
provided, however, tha
an amount of money e(F
compensation for servi
of said hotel/motel us,
The Finance Director,
or representative, may
the purpose of inspect
the proper administrat
of collection of the he
any person to preven
Director or his duly
discharge of his dutie
See. 8.1205. Interest
any hotel or hotel ownE
pay to the Finance Dire
(30) days after the due
and payable at the ri
addition, a penalty of
due shall be assessed
owner, operator and/or
hotel/motel use tax.
Sec. 8.1206. Transmitt
as a result of the
including interest and
of the Village of Moi:
deposited in the gener
Sec. 8.1207. License I
payment of s
enforced by action in
failure to collect, a4
payment penalty shall h
license issued in conjE
motel, all in additioz
Such suspension or rev(
IV of Chapter 10 of the
Sec. 8.1208. Violati4
found guilty of viola
refusing to comply wit
of any provision of
specifically provided,
to a fine of not less I
than One Thousand Dolli
a violation exists s
offense.
orn hotel and motel oci
owner, operator and/or
Village on forms provid
anting, leasing, or lett
ipon which said monthly
.ed by the Finance Direc
B accompanied by payment
g for the month cover
the person making said
1 to two percent (2%)
:s rendered in the coll
tax.
f
uth
se
y person designated
�r the premises of an,
and examining its bo
of this Article and
,motel use tax. It st
hinder or interfere
orized agent or ref
t forth herein.
ind Penalties. In the
operator and/or lice
,tor the tax required h
date, interest shall ac
to of one percent (V
ten percent (10%) of t]
and collected against
icensee who fails to co'
ancy tax return
censee with the
by him, showing
of rooms during
turns are to be
) the Village of
by the return,
turn may retain
the tax due as
ion and payment
him as his agent
tel or motel for
and records for
the enforcement
,be unlawful for
.th the Finance
entative in the
nt of failure by
a to collect and
in within thirty
ulate and be due
per month. In
:ax and interest
hotel or motel
-t and remit this
of Tax Collection. All monies collected
)osition of this hotel/motel use tax,
nalties, shall be paid! -into the Treasury
Prospect and shall be credited to and
corporate fund of the Village.
ispension, Revocation. (
id tax and any payment
any court of competent
count for and pay over
cause for suspension'or
fiction with the operation
to any other penalties
ration shall in be accorc,
5 village Code.
MS. Any owner, operas(
ing, disobeying, omitti
or resisting or opposi
this Article, excep-
upon conviction thereof
aan Two Hundred Dollars
rs ($1,000.00) for each
all constitute a sepa
)llection and
penalty may be
jurisdiction and
,aid tax and any
revocation of any
of a hotel and/or
in this Article.
ince with Article
and/or licensee
r, neglecting or
the enforcement
when otherwise
shall be subject
'200.00) nor more
'fense. Each day
to and distinct
Hotel/Motel Use Tax
Page 3 of 3
In addition to any fines and penalties provided in this Article,
the Village Manager may cause a hearing to consider revocation of
business license, as provided in Article IV of Chapter 10 of this
Village Code. 11
SECTION TWO: That the effective date of this Ordinance shall be
July 1, 1991.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
. 1991.
AN ORDINANCE TO AMEND ARTICLE V ENTITLED
"METERS AND RATES" OF CHAPTER 22 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Artile V entitled "Meters and Rates" of Chapter 22 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, Illinois is hereby amended as follows:
(A) By amending Subsection C of Section 22.502.1 to read as follows:
C. If any owner or consumer refuses admittance to any premises where
admittance has been requested by an authorized representative of the
Water Department for any purposes provided in this Article, then access
to the premises shall not be obtained until a proper warrant has been
issued. In the event that admittance to any premise has been refused,
the Public Works Director may discontinue water service at such loca-
tion.
(B) By amending Subsection D of Section 22.502.2 to read as follows:
D. If any owner or consumer refuses admittance to any premises where
admittance has been requested by an authorized representative of the
Water Department for any purposes provided in this Article, then access
to the premises shall not be obtained until a proper warrant has been
issued. In the event that admittance to any premise has been refused,
the Public Works Director may discontinue water service at such loca-
tion.
(C) By amending Subsections A and B of Section 22.504.2 to read as follows:
A. All Village users within the Village, having a direct or indirect
connection with Village water mains or pipes shall pay the following
rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $2.38
B. All Village users outside the corporate limits of the Village having a
direct or indirect connection with Village water mains or pipes shall
pay the following rate:
Water Rate For each 1,000 gallons
consumed or portion thereof $4.76
(D) By amending Subsection C of Section 22.504.3 to read as follows:
C. Rate:
L All Village sever users within the corporatel ' limits of the Village,
having a direct or indirect connection witbthe Village sewer and
water mains or pipes shall pay the followingi sewer rate, based upon
the amount of water consumed to which sewer :service is furnished:
Per 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $0.24
2 All Village sewer users within the corporate, limits of the Village
having a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer mains
or pipes and not with the Village water mains or pipes, shall pay a
flat rate of:
Per month per dwelling unit $2.00
3. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having
a direct or indirect connection with the Village sewer and water
mains or pipes, shall pay the following sewer rate based upon the
amount of water consumed to which sewer service is furnished:
Per 1,000 gallons of water
consumed or portion thereof $0.48
4. All sewer users outside the corporate limits of the Village having
a direct or indirect connection with the 'Village sewer mains or
pipes, but not with Village water mains or pipes, shall pay a flat
rate of:
Per month per dwelling unit $4.00
(E) By amending Paragraph I of Section 22.506.1 to read as follows:
Late Payment Penalty; Service Shut Off. All water and sewer charges shall
be due and payable on or before the twenty first day after the date of the
statement for such charges. All bills unpaid after the twenty one (21) day
period provided for shall become delinquent and a penalty of ten percent
(10%,) of the total amount of such charges shall be added thereto and shall
be due in addition to the charges for such services. The provisions of this
Section shall apply to all consumers regardless of whether the premises is
owner occupied or occupied by a tenant. Any agreement between a property
owner and his tenant regarding the payment of water or sewer bills shall not
be binding to the Village.
(F) By adding Paragraph 2 to Section 22.506.2 to read as follows:
The filing of any claim for lien under this Section shall not be construed
to limit the right and power of the Village to enforce collection of the
delinquent water or sewer account against the consumer in any manner
whatsoever.
SECTION TWO: The water and sewer rates established by Section One of this Ordinance
shall be effective for billings,, subsequent to June 30, 1991.
2
SECT ON THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect upon its passage,
approval., and publication in pamphlet form in accordance with law.
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1 1991,
AYES:
ABSENT:
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
3
Village President
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: AMENDMENT TO SECTION 18.1905 OF THE TRAFFIC CODE
DATE: MARCH 26, 1991
At the request of the Police Chief, I have prepared the attached
Ordinance which increases the fine for specified violations from
$10.00 to $20.00 if paid within the required 10 days. If the fine
isn't paid within the first 10 days it is proposed that the fine
be increased from $20.00 to $30.00.
The existing fines have been a part of the Code for a number of
years and it is the recommendation of the Police Chief that the
proposed increase would be appropriate at this time.
The entire paragraph "B" was retyped due to the fact that lettering
system on the various subparagraphs was incorrect. The only
changes are the increased fines.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
caf/
cc: Chief Pavlock
Deputy Chief Richardson
Deputy Chief Daley
CAF/
3/25/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE. That Section 18.1905.B entitled "Penalties" of
Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended is hereby further amended by increasing the settlement
claim for certain violations paid within the specified 10 day
period from $10.00 to $20.00, and by increasing the settlement
amount for certain violations not paid within the specified 10 day
period but within 20 days from $20.00 to $30.00; so that
hereinafter said Section 18.1905.B shall be and read as follows:
B. Notwithstanding the penalties provided in subsection Aof this
Section for a person convicted of a violation of any provision
of this Chapter, any police officer may, in lieu of the filing
of the complaint in court in the first instance, issue to such
alleged violator a citation with respect to the violation of
the following sections of this Chapter.
1.
Any section
in Article
XIII of this Chapter except for
subsections
I and J of Section 18.1322 and Section
18.1324.
2.
Any section
in Article
XIV of this Chapter.
3.
Any section
in Article
XV of this Chapter.
4.
Any section
of Article
XVII of this Chapter.
5.
Schedules V
through XVI
as provided in Sections 18.2005
through 18.2016 of this
Chapter.
Such citation shall be on a standard for use in the Circuit
Court of Cook County and commonly known as a "PC" ticket or
shall be in the form of a notice suitable for mailing, and
shall state the specific section of this Chapter that was
violated and shall inform the alleged violator that he may
settle the said violation claim and avoid an appearance in
court for such violation in the following manner:
a. The alleged violator may settle such violation claim
by payment at the Finance Department of the Village
of Mount Prospect of the sum of Twenty Dollars
($20.00) within ten (10) days following the issuance
of said citation.
b. In the event that the said violator to whom the
citation is issued fails to settle the violation
claim within a period of ten (10) days and he is
issued a final notice and given an additional period
of ten (10) days to settle the violation claim, then
upon payment to the Finance Department of the
Village of Mount Prospect of the sum of Thirty
Dollars ($30.00) during said period.
C. In the event that no settlement payment is made
within the ten (10) day period prescribed in the
final notice, then the issuing police officer shall
cause a 'notice to appear' to be served upon the
alleged violator or shall file a complaint with
Chapter 18
Section 18.1905
Page 2 of 2
respect to said violation and the same shall be
processed in the Circuit Court of Cook County in
accordande with the penalty provided in subsection
A of this Section.
d. Where the alleged violation involves a failure to
comply with vehicle identification or equipment
requirements of this Chapter, then in addition to
a payment of the amounts set forth above, the
alleged violator must also show proof of compliance
with the ' section so violated in order to achieve a
settlement of the violation claim.
The fact that an; automobile or motor vehicle which is
illegally operated or parked is registered with the Secretary
of State in the name of said alleged violator; or, in the
alternative, in the event that a vehicle sticker issued by the
Village of Mount Prospect has been issued in the name of and
to said alleged violator, shall be considered as prima facie
proof that said alleged violator was in control of or was the
operator of the automobile or motor vehicle at the time of
such alleged violation.
All payments made in settlement of a violation claim pursuant
to the provisions of this subsection shall be duly receipted
for by the Finance Department official receiving the same, and
such payments shall be promptly remitted to the Village
Treasurer to be credited to the proper Municipal Fund.
SECTION TWO: That the amendments set forth in this Ordinance shall
become effective June 1j 1991.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the
manner provided by law.,
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President,
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois NP
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director
DATE: March 27, 1991
SUBJECT: Adoption of Budget Ordinance
Attached is the Ordinance providing for an Annual Budget in lieu of an
Appropriation Ordinance, and a copy of the Public Notice establishing a Public
Hearing on April 16, 1991. The Notice indicates the revised budget amounts as
a result. of the changes approved by the Village Board on March 26, 1991 and the
inclusion of the Library's budget request.
The following procedures are required before the budget can be adopted:
1, Announcement at the Village Board meeting on April 3, 1991 of a
public hearing on the tentative annual budget to be held on April 16,
1991.
2. First reading of the Budget Ordinance on April 3, 1991.
3, Publication of the Public Notice of the Budget Hearing on April 4,
1991 in the Mount Prospect Herald.
4. Public Hearing on April 16, 1991 on the tentative annual budget,
5. Adoption of the Budget Ordinance on April 16, 1991.
6. Filing a copy of the Budget Ordinance with the County Clerk after
adoption.
The revised copies of the budget will then be compiled and will be available
prior to May 1, 1991.
DCJ/sm
Enc
A Budget Hearing will be held on April 16, 1991 for all
the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois. The following
fiscal year beginning May 1,11991:
Village Funds:
General Fund. . . . . . . . .
.$17
Special Revenue Funds . . . . . . . . .
. . 4
Debt Service Funds. . . . . . . .
I
Capital Projects Funds. . . . . . .
6
Enterprise Funds . . . . .
6
Internal Service Funds. . .
2
Pension Funds . . . . . . ,
- 1
Totals.
.$40
LesslInterfund Transfers.
Totals Villhge Funds.
$40
Library Fund.
Totals Village and Library Funds. . .
. . 14LI
The meeting will be held in
Street, Mount Prospect, Illi
budget at 7:30 p.m. be p
Office of the Village Clerk
Prospect, Illinois between 8
have the opportunity to giv
encouraged to attend and cor
ae Mounts Prospect Senior Cez
As, for the purpose of disc,
posed budget may be examina
n the Village Hall, 1,00 S.
,0 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. All in
written and oral comments.
JOHN FOLTON DIXON
Village Manager
Published in Mt. Prospect Herald April 4, 1991.
rested citizens of
at is proposed for
G2,820
32,860
55,440
07,785
70,415
83,500
95,400
48,220
L,9 -5 -Q -Q>
48,720
:,, 50 South Emerson
ion of the proposed
on weekdays in the
arson Street, Mount
ested-citizens will
4enior Citizens are
ORDINANCE NO,
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AN ANNUAL BUDGET FOR THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
COMMENCING MAY 1, 1991 TO APRIL 30, 1992 IN
LIEU OF PASSAGE OF AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
in accordance with Statutes, have provided for the preparation and adoption of
an annual budget in lieu of passage of an Appropriation Ordinance for the fiscal
year commencing May 1, 1991 to April 30, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect for the
fiscal year beginning May 1, 1991 and ending April 30, 1992, as prepared by the
Budget Officer for the Village and submitted to the President and Board of
Trustees, was placed on file in the Office of the Village Clerk on April 3,
1991, for public inspection, as provided by Statute; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to notice duly published on April 4, 1991, a public hearing
was held by the President and Board of Trustees on said tentative annual budget
on April 16, 1991, as provided by statute; and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said tentative annual budget was reviewed
by the President and Board of Trustees and a copy of said tentative annual budget
is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect
beginning May 1, 1991 and ending April 30, 1992, a copy of which is attached
hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby approved and adopted as the Annual
Budget for the Village of Mount Prospect for said fiscal year.
SECTION TWO: Within thirty (30) days following the adoption of this Ordinance
there shall be filed with the County Clerk of Cook County a copy thereof duly
certified by the Village Clerk and Estimate of Revenues by source anticipated
to be received by the Village in the fiscal year beginning May 1, 1991 and ending
April 30, 1992, duly certified by the Chief Fiscal Officer.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in -full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided
by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this 16th day of _4pril, 1991.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: March 15, 1991
SUBJECT: Sunset Road Reconstruction
VIUAGE C
CS
MAR 2 5 1991
Attached is a Resolution for Improvement by municipality Under the
Illinois Highway Code (BLR 4103) for $150,000-00 for the Sunset
Road Reconstruction Project. The resolution is required by the
Illinois Department of Transportation before motor fuel tax funds
can be used for this project.
I recommend that this resolution be adopted at the Village Board
Meeting on April 3, 1991. This project will be funded with monies
from the 1990-1991 Budget, Account Number 22-071-04-8510, Page 152.
I concur with the above recommendation
JWulbecker, P.E.
n e ing coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
Chuck Bencic, P.E.
Director of Inspection Services
FT/m
Attachment
Fred Tennyson, P.E.
Oesolution for improvement by,Municipality Construction
Under the Illinois Highway Code
BE IT RESOLVED, by the of the
Councilor Preeldont and Board of Trusts"
VILLAGE of MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Illinois
City, Town or Village
that the following described street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Codec
Name of Thoroughfare I Route From To
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of RZK=rAI, ny RXTjz !:rUG. RAN BSE AND
PETER TEE) SURFACE, !NSTPL�aWION QW-- G 1) FLE 18LE BASE
and be designated as Section 91_-00 1
2. That there is hereby appropriated the (
and shall, be constructed
sum of
040000000- Dollars ($--$aImprovementi of Bald section from the murn cfpality`s allotment of Motor Fuel Tax f
3. That work shall be done by
(3peclty Contract or Day tabor)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit two
APPROVED
9—Dep19—
Department
artment of Transportation
District Engineer
BLR 4103 (Rev. 6/86)
IL 4940352
feet wide
) for the
; and,
copies of this resolution to
'14,1440 CAROL A rTET.D-q UTTI.AC'F; Clerk
M rs. (City. Town, or Village)
in and for the VILLAGE of M01IRT PROSPECT
(City, Town, or Village)
County of COOX hereby certify the foregoing
to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by
the AvAD U10 BOARD OF 2q*>XJSTj3E-Q
(Ccuncn or Premd rt and Board of Tr 3
19 91
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
day of A.D. 19—
(S E A Q
9—.(SEAL)
(City, Town, or Village)
Clerk.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinoisa
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager I
Village Clerk
FROM: Jeff Wulbecker, Engineering Coordinator JKIT—
DATE:
March 25, 1991
SUBJECT: Village Commons Subdivision
Attached please find the Village Board Acceptance form for the subject project bearing the
staff sign offs. The project has been satisfactorily completed. Please place this in line for
inclusion at the next Village Board Meeting.
JW:m
VILLAGE BOARD
PROJECT
LOCATION:
DATE: I
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS AP
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION REC
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION REC
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED
ZONING CRITERIA MET(IAN
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL
INSPECTION SERVICES A
FIRE DEPARTMENT APPRO'
EPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMP
AND/OR
IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
ROVED T-Lr-
IVED:
RDED:
AND APPROVED.
SCAPE PLANTING
APPROVALt�)2
OVAL
WATER MAIN 0 FT., SIZE
SANITARY SEWER 0,, FT. siz
STORM SEWER 0 iFT. —SIZE
ROADWAYS 0
SIDEWALKS 4650 SQ.FT.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS NONE
STREET LIGHTS -YYS—, # 4
PARKWAY TREES YES # 22
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING INSTALL AS P
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS _NZA
WATER MAIN _
SANITARY SEWER
STORM SEWER
ROADWAY INSTA
PARKING LOTS
LANDSCAPING
FT. all SIZE
138 FT. 81, is" :SIZE
X279FT. 1211 15" -SIZE
PER PLM
E —SQ.YDS.
AREAS — NZA
ENGINEER
CLERK
CLERK
ENGINEER
PLANNING &
ZONING
PUB.WKS.DIR.
INSP.SERV.DIR.
FIRE PREVENTION
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF�'TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS , DAY OF -1 19--
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
Village Manager
FROM:
Project Engineer
DATE:
March 27, 1991
SUBJECT:
1991 GENERAL MAINTENANCE RESOLUTION
Attached is a Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and Highways By Municipality,
under the Illinois Highway Code, in the amount of $962,000.00. The resolution is required
by the Illinois Department of Transportation before motor fuel tax funds may be used for
general maintenance operations. Such operations include the resurfacing program, the
purchase of road salt and traffic signal maintenance.
I recommend that this resolution be adopted at the April 3, 1991 Village Board
Meeting.
I WC -TI a 11#k" 0 1# !
IIS
I concur with the above recommendation
A. e�cker, Qngm�eering `Coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
Chuck Ben4 ic, -Director of Inspection Services
FF:m
xc: Director of Public Works
59�00
Illinois Department Resolution for Maintenance of
of Transportation By M ' ' under the 1
BE IT RESOLVED, by the via or and Board of Trustees
(Council or Pmadeut of Tnwleea)
Village of Mount Prospect , Illinois, that d
(City, Town or Village) 1,(Na")
appropriated the sum of $ 962,000.00 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purp
streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code, from
to December 31, 19 91
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that only those streets, highways, and opera
on the approved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or re
connection with this resolution, are eligible for maintenance with Motot Fuel Tax funds
above.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall, as soon as practicable aft
given above, submit to the Department of Transportation, on forms furnished by said Dep
meat showing expenditures from and balances refraining in the account(s) for this period;
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two
resolution to the district office of the Department%of Transportation, at Schaumburg
-Mf-..
I, Carol A. Fields Clerk in and for the
Mrs.
of Mount Prospect , Col
hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution
the Mayor and Board of Trustees at a meeting
(Council or President and Hoard of Trude")
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, i have;hereunto set my hand and seal this
A.D. 19
(SEAL)
BLR 4123
s and Ifighways
ffmhwav Code
of the
hereby
maintaining
ry 1, 91
as listed and described
estimates approved in
ig the period as specified
close of the period as
it, a certified state -
copies of this
, Illinois.
(City, Town or Village)
of Cook
I by
April 3, 1991
day of
Village Clerk
(City, Town or Village)
APPROVED
19
Department of Transportation
District Engineer
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
*I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Tmcrrvtu
TO: Village Manager
FROM; Director Public Works
DATE: March 28, 1991
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results
Two 3/4 -Ton Pickup Trucks
Sealed bids were opened at 10 A.M. on March 27, 1991 for two 3/4 -ton
pickup trucks. 11 invitational bids were forwarded, and eight respons-
es were received. Bid results are attached.
There is $40,000.allocated in the proposed 1991-92 budget -for this
recommended purchase under account codes. 48-077-93-8352 and 48-077-93-
8355. 1 recommend awarding the contract to the apparent low bidder,
Lattof Chevrolet in an amount not to exceed s28,ias.84. 1 reguest-
authorization to order these vehicles prior to passage of the budget
so that we can get our order in before the factory closes out the 1991
model year.
JIUX&A.t z"' Zt),Ls_V,,'
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
PICKUP91.RES/FILES/BIDS
Bidder
Lattof Chevrolet
Tom Todd Chevrolet
GMC Truck Center
Joe Mitchell GMC
Anthony Dodge
Hoskins Chevrolet
Northwest Ford Trucks
Elmhurst Ford
3/4 -TON PICKUP
3/27/ 91
Chevy CC20903E63C6P $8,6$5.84
Chevy 1
• 25001�
�1
* Sierra 1 1
*fod ,c �D�1
Chevy '1
Ford F28 HD
Ford . t HD
1 1
p;iTi. N,
4.
Mount'Orospect Public Works Department
7 F
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Tw ary ta
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: March 28, 1991
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results
Compact Station Wagon
Sealed bids were opened at 10 A.M. on March 27, 1991 for one compact
station wagon. '11 invitational bids were forwarded, and we had four
responses. Bid results as follows:
Bidder
Name/Model
Bid Price
Deliver
Hoskins Chevrolet*
Chevy VL Wagon
$10,407.43
6-8 wks.
Lattof Chevrolet
Chevy IJC35RS
10,429.15
5-9 wks.
Schmerler Ford
Ford Escort
10,450.00
50 days
Elmhurst Motors
Ford Escort LX
10,472.00
---
* - does not meet
specications
There is $11,000 allocated
in the proposed 1991-92 budget
for this
proposed purchase,
account no. 48-077-93-8330.
I recommend awarding the contract to the lowest qualified bidder,
Lattof Chevrolet, in the amount of $10,429.15. 1 request approval
to award this bid at this time so that the vehicle can be ordered
from the factory under the current (1991) model year. This is an
additional vehicle for the administrative pool car fleet.
HLW/td
COMWGN91.RES/FILF-S/BIDS
k L ILI
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
F
F
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= ary usA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: March 27, 1991
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results
35,000 GVWR Cab & Chassis
Sealed bids were opened at 10 A.M. on March 27, 1991 for one 35,000
GVWR cab and chassis. Seven invitational bids were forwarded in
addition to advertising as required, and four bids were received.
Bid results as follows:
Bidder
Name/Model
Bid Price
Delivery
Freund International
Inter'l 4954
$36,610.00
90-120 days
GMC Truck Center
GMC TC7H042
37,516.50
90 days
Pollard Motor Co.
Inter'l 4900
37,751.36
60- 90 days
Schmerler Ford
Ford LNaOOO
44,930.80
90 days
There is $58,000 allocated in the proposed 1991-92 budget for this
proposed purchase under
Account Code
48-077-93-8358.
I recommend awarding the contract to the low bidder, Freund. Interna-
tional, Inc. for one International 4954 cab and chassis, at a deliv-
ered price of $36,610. 1 request authorization to order this vehi-
cle prior to passage of the budget so that we can get our order in
before the factory closes out the 1991 model year. Delivery is
anticipated in 90 to 120 days.
we
1;M_*TZF4MrrW1 0
HLW/td
CABCHASI.RES/FILES/BIDS.
�iTf.:�iNC:l.I�■
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: March 27, 1991
SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Results
53,000 GVWR Cab & Chassis
Sealed bids were opened at 10 A.M. on March 27, 1991 for one 53,000
GVWR cab and chassis. Seven invitational bids were forwarded in
addition to advertising as required, and four bids were received.
Bid results as follows:
Bidder
Name/Model
Bid Price
Delivery
Freund International
Inter'1 SF 4954
$36,244.00
90-120
days
Pollard Motor Co.
Inter'l 4900
38,754.91
60- 90
days
GMC Truck Center
GMC TC7H064
40,399.00
60- 90
days
Schmerler Ford
Ford LNT8000
44,920.00
90
days
There is $70,000 allocated in the proposed 1991-92 budget for this
proposed purchase under Account Code 48-077-93-5357.
I recommend awarding the contract to the low bidder, Freund Interna-
tional, Inc. for one International 4954 cab and chassis, at a deliv-
ered price of $36,244. Bid price includes trade-in of 1981 Interna-
tional Model.1854 dump truck. I request authorization to order this
vehicle prior to passage of the budget so that we can get our order
in before the factory closes out the 1991 model year. Delivery is
anticipated in 90 to 120 days. The low bidder, Freund Internation-
al, gave us a trade-in allowance of $10,125. Following acceptance
of this bid, we will be bidding for dump body, hydraulic system and
hopper salt spreader.
'�
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
53000TRR.RES/FILES/BIDS
Mount Prospect Public Woe
rks D
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUMpartment
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: March 28, 1991
SUBJ: Turf Mowing Bid Results
Sealed bids were opened on March 27, 1991, for a turf mowing
contract. Attachment A is a tabulation of bid results.
The bid was structured to allow us to delete some areas from the
contract if bid prices were higher than anticipated. On Page
123 of the 1991-92 budget, $20,000.00 has been allocated for
contractual turf mowing (Account #01-071-03-6115). Attachment B
is a list of areas that can be mowed without exceeding the budg-
eted amount. The deleted areas will be added to the areas mowed
by Village forces.
The low bidder, Hoff Landscape Contractors has performed satis-
factorily for us in the past. I recommend the award of a turf
mowing contract to Hoff Landscape Contractors in an amount not
to exceed $20,000.00.
l�etA`- � W_'_Ck
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Attached
Affachnoent A
Turf Mowing Bid Results - March 27, 1991
Extended Cost
Area Hoff
Excel
RaWropo Peurs
Ingram
I Lem 's
Gambino
O&J
E -Z Autumn Amadcas
-
SusWW'Dro Improvement 260000
AliloM
195M 728.00
850.001
650.00
520.00
418.00
760.00 850.00 231.92
Villa Holl MOM
200.00
_
130.00 200.00
260.00
390.00
. . .
200.00
312.00
2130.00 650.00 142.48
Sonlot Center 206.00
468.00
130.00 312,00.200=
390.00
250.00
312.00
650.00 650.00 128.70,
Public Safety 200.00
468.00,
195,00 572,00
520100
S20.00
33111M,
390.00
650.00 85000, 271.70
Train Station 260.00
M. Ie Street Lot 354.00
468.00
932.00
280.00 850.00
31200 UZOO
520.00
1,144.00
85000
1,040.00
050.00
910.00
520.00
728.00
1,170.00 650.001 390.00
1,170.00 595.86
10ohm's island 20000
364L00
143,00 418.00
364,00
520.00
300.00
312,00
yTry650'00�
520.00'..A52,00 222.30
Prospect Ave.
Center Islands 260.00
520.00
247.00 544.00
702.00
780.00
520.00
548.00
760.001. 650.00 399,82
Ey"reent A".
Center Islands 290.00
520.00
273,00 650.00
70200
1,040.00
57200,
598.00
78000 650.00 492,"
S -Curve
q St Raymond's
MOO
780.00
1,040.00
1,040.001
824.00
910.00,
1,300 00, 1 003.60
Elm horst Ave,
Islands 488,00
599,00
woo
720,00
1,300.00
520.00
546.00
0-0
W .1-1-
1.300.00..
Weller
Creek Imorovement 312.00
273,00 3M00
520.00
520.00
572.00
650.00
650.00 520.00
Neighborhood Pork
520.00
__"2,00
1,09zoo.00
Z210.00
�n1,300.02
1,170.00
632.00
1.040,00
624.00
910.00. 1,000.48
Centennial Park
2,002,00
2,106.00
W ----
2,340.00 2,470.00
2_386.00
1,820.00
2,060,06
2,860.00
1 850.00 2470_00 _4 57�9�,2
Railroad ROW on
Prospect Main to Control
988.00
1,328.00
780.00.938.00
1,p 84.00
19950*00
1.040.00
754.00
1.040.00 1,300.00 12,3500
NW =.ocnentrall
1,442,00
1,456,00
1,458,00 1,092001
1,794.00
1,890.00
1,580.00,
1788.00
1.950.00 1951.00 2.860.00
Railroad ROW on Prospect
Main to MIL Prospect Rd.
2,080.00
1,848.00
2.230.00 1,950.00
2,800.00
2,600100
1'62000
21730-00
2,090.00 2,470.00 4,394.00
Railroad ROW an NW Highway
Elm to Mt. Prospect Ad.
3,380.00
2,852.00
4,380.00 3,900.00
4,180.00
3,900.00
5,740,00
4,160,00 4,550.00 9,230,Od
Railroad ROW on NW Highway
Water -an to Central
31840.00
2L938.00
5,070.00 1,290.00
__.3,27
3,432.00
3,900.00
4,030.00
6,182.00
4,420.00 5,200.00 9A94,1
W, Prospect & Central
1,(40.00
024,00 1
906.00 720-00
MOO
760.00
2,054.00
1119ed22
780.00 1,580.00 1,94044
Well *4 - 119 N. Via
520.00
338.00
204,00 410,00
31200
520.00
650.00
494.00
850.00 650.00 403,00
Water Tower
260,00
312.00
143.00 488,00
520=
312.00
312P00
520,00 850,00
Historical Society
Museum - 101 S. Maole
468.00
442,00
410.00 501111-00
__.288.00
416.00
520.001
85000
494.00
52000 1.30000 797 68
3 S. Smilmon
260.00
260.00
105,00 36COO
234.00
280.00
28000
468.00
390.00
390.00650 01)� 27300
Fire Station 2 Lot & Parkway_
520.00
494.001
460.00 832.00
-gM�00�
546.00
W.00
78000
78000
910,00.
W,00
520.00 � 1,300.00
Fire Station 2
260.00
i6o.001
143-00 2W.00
23COO
390.001
390.00
312.00
390.00 050100
171.86
well *5
2".00
280.E
Moo 596.00
2
910-00
650.00
520.00
780.00 650,00
39020
Grogiory/William Lot
also along Band Road
304.00
624.00
728.00 670.00
70200
I'Imoo
1170.00
884.00
910.00 1,300.00...
1 428 9e
Well 017
416.00
936.00
910.00, moo
858.00
1'040=
1,924.00
1,118.00
910.00 1,560.00'
4
EuclidlAouts 63
41e.00
9M.00
864.00 qW.00
SW,00
040.00
11924RLO
1088.00
L10.00 DO
1,714 44
Hiawatha Lot
416.00
466.00
351.00
1,144.00
650.00,
520.00
832.00
1,100.DO 650.00
0!2,
NW Highway -Dale to Forest
468.00
416.00
37TD0 3W.001
1,14A 00
$20,001
50&20
MaE
1,100.00 65000.
. .....737.88
Golf Road Guard Rall
MOM
312.00
280.00 4811.00
1,22200
520.001
330,00
572.00
800.00 85000
462 28
Gregory/Marcefia (N. side
of Mameft E. of Gregory)
Moo
260.00
143.00, 3114.00
23400
520.001
M�00
338001
550.00 65000
230�,08'
Prospect Am. (S. side
Mt, Prospect Rd. to Albo!g
Moo
312.00
143.00 304.00
234.00
390.001
390.00
338.00
I 5W.00 _j5�00L
0.
1 & 5 S. Pine 0 �Lot
390=
438.00
Smog 702-00
_ 1.664,00
260.00
1,040.00
700.00
895-00
11 a. Pine St.
MOM
208,00
143.00 312.001
23400390.00
200.00
312.00
6W.00 850001
10 S. Pine St. (Village Lot)
416.00
468.00
676.00 emoo
1,884,00
390.00
1,055.00
$08.00
895.00 1,300.00
1,329 90
School & Lannqu at
1,056.00
494.00
988.00 850.00
1,092.00
9I0F00
2,054.00
1,104.00
1,295.00 1,580.00..
1,93700
Gowunnoma" easin
280.00
442.00
211110.00 91111111,00
678.00,
910.001
404.00
410,00.
625,00, 950.00... 298 :40
Total
$29 572 ,00.
**A 2211 M
.00
1 S39.141ZOOLe_40,274
Od
"0430.00
$41 350.00 548.880.00. S56_779 k
6 Corrected Totals
Attachment B
R*commondod Contract Aron*
Aron
Hol►
Excel
R 0Paul's
In ram
Coro 's
Gambino
�AQ,A
E -Z
Autumn
Amerke'a
9usaelytNtlefm rovement
280.040
488.00
1¢5.0
7211.00
850.00
850.0
520.00
418.00
730.00
650.00
231.92
VBIa a Ha8
280.00
280.00
13D.00
260.00
280.00
390.00
280.00
'.. 312.00
280.00
850.00.
142.48
Ssnior Canter
208.00
488.00
130.00
312.00
260-00
380.00
280.00
312.00
850.00
650.0.
128.70
Train Station
260.00
468,07
210.00
& 850.00520.00
950.00
650.00
. 520.00
1.170.00
850.00
39000
Maple Street Lot
394.00
832.00
312.00
832.00
1,144.00
1,040.00
910.00
728.D0
1.170.00
850.00.x.
595.98
KlehWsIsland
280, DO
384.00
1,.00
419.00:
384,01
520100
380.07
: 312.00
520.00
950.00
222.30
Prospect Ave.
Center Islands
290.00
520.00
247.00
548.00
702.07
780.00
520.00
,,. ': 548.07
780.00
850.00.
398.62
Evegreen Ave.
Center Islands
280.00
520.00
2M.00
850.00
702.00
10,4000
572.07
590, D0
780.00
850.00
49244
S -Cures
b St. Eia mood'sb20.00
MOO
520.00
832.01
780.00
1040.00
1040.0
824.00
910.00..
d
1,300.004
tmm003.80
Elmhurst Avs.
Center Islands
468.00
{
598.00
4 .DO
1,040.00
728.00
1,300.00
520.00
548.00
780.00
f
1,300.00 f�
875.941
w-Nelghborh0ad Perk
520.00
1,092.00.
�.0o
2210.00
1,170.00
832.00
1,040.00
624.00
910.00
1,30000
1,000.48
Centennial Park
2.002,00
2,108.00
2340,00
2470.00
2,388.07
1,820.00
2,080,06
,. 2880.00
1950.00
,2,470,00
44579.12
Railroad ROW on
Prospect Main to Central
989.001
1,329.00'.,
74,0 ,00
938.00
1,884.00
1.950.00
1,040.00
€ 754.00.
1,040.00
1,300.00,.,
1.235.00
RaBrwd ROW 0.
NW HI hwa Main to Central
1 492.00
1
1 458,00
,0 ,00
1.09Z001
1 794.00
1.890.00
1 580=00..
1 788,00
1.950.00
1 950.00
2 890.00
Railroad ROW on Prospect
Main to Mt. Pros ed Rd.
2,080.00...
1.848.00
_.j.45
a"
1,950,00
2,800.00.
2 800.00.
1,820.00
,., 2,730. D0.
2080.00.
2,470.00
4,394.00
Railroad ROW on NW Highway
Elm to Mt Prospect Rd.
3.390.00
2.852.00
__j
4,&0.00
3,900.00
3178.07
4 180.00
3,900.00
5,746.00
4,160.00
4,550.00
9.230.0(1
Railroad ROW on NW Highway
Waterman to Central
3 840.DO
2.938.00
5,0
4,29g.00
3,432.07.
3,900.00
4,030.00
8 182.00
4,420.00
5200.00
9,984.18
Well a4 - 119 N. Waverly
520.00
338.07
20111,00
31207
520.00
850.00
: 494.00.
850.07
850.00
403.0()
Water Tower
290.00
312.00
�.
143.00
w-,416.00
488.00
288.00
520.00
31200
,' 31200
520.00
650.00
195.78
_1111.. Historical Society'
Museum - 101.1 Maple
498.001
44200
4{,.00
598.00
418.00
520.00
850.00
484.00
520.00
1.300.00
797.98
3 S. Emerson
280.00
280.00
1.07
384.00
234.00
280.00
468.00
..... 390.07
390.00.
850.00
273.00
G'regory/WUdam Lot
also Wong Rend Roa4384.00
824.00
725.00
878.00.
702.07
1170.00
1170.00
58400
910.00
1,300.00
1,428.96
Well ♦17
418.00
936.00
at 0.00
9192.00
958.00
1,040.00
1,924.00
-;': 1,118M
910.00
1580.00
10799.48
Proapect Ave. IS. side
Mt. Prospect Rd. to Albert
290 DO
31200
1#.00
384.00
234.07
390.00
390.00
338.00.
550.07:
850.00
228.80
11 S. Pine St.
209.00
111'1, 208.00
1940
31200
234.001
390.00
260.00
.. Moo
650.00
850.00.
140.66
Total
81 B 968.00
98
321 8.07
122714
227.274.00.
t2S„S118.00 $29 582.00 128 g38.
828 900.00 828 410.00.$34
450.00 142 932.74
-Corrected Totals
Mount "Orospect Public Works Ditoartment
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: March 27, 1991
SUBJ: Bid Results - V & G Lot Landscaping
Sealed bids were opened on March 27, 1991, for landscaping of
the Village -owned parking lot at the northeast corner of Main
and Busse. Bid results are attached. The low bidder, Wilson
Landscape Contractors, Inc., has performed satisfactory work for
us in the past.
On Page 168 of the 1991-92 budget $38,000 has been allocated
for Parking Lot Improvements (Account #56-077-62-8035). 1 recom-
mend the award of a contract in the amount of $7,495.00 to Wil-
son Landscape Contractors, Inc. to include planting plus option-
al mulching and one optional watering.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Attached
Bid Opening
Landscaping of Main & Busse Ave. Parking Lot
4
Wilson
Rolling
8-4-0.0-0
----89-6,-001
-1,052.00
880.00
1,180.001
1.216.00
1,128.00
2
Landscape
I
1-1111z
ld
Berthold
�Nursey
Keftn
ICramer
I vlie
Autumn
:: r itrside
Ingram
I
Qty.
Ccmon Name Contractors I
Nursery
0rse
1116.00
Nursery
Grew
Landscaping
_
Industries
Enterprise S
4
U lelealf Linden
836.00 1.040.00
558.00 450.00
8-4-0.0-0
----89-6,-001
-1,052.00
880.00
1,180.001
1.216.00
1,128.00
2
Bradford Pear
668.00
690.00
676.00
500.00
760.00
696.00
648.00
4
Amur Chokecherry
592.00 800.00
520.00
596.00
1116.00
680.00
760.001
936.00
996.00
2
Austrian Pine
338.00 190.00
286.00
300.00
372.00
220.00
340.00
242.00
416.00
16
Peking Cotoneaster
256.00 208.00
288.00
320.00
240.00
288.00
400.001
192.00
267.20
47
Dwarf Burning Bush
1410.00 1.034.00
1668.50
1 410.00
1,316.00
1880.00
11880.001
11833.00
11513.40
83
Snowmound SpIrea
830.00 079.00
1,079.00
1,411.00
1 245.00
1 328.00
1,203.501
1,411.00
1,386A0
80
Mint Jule Juniper
1,280.00 1,600.00
1,920.00
1 2,000.00
1,444.00
1,920.00
1584.0-0
1,760.00
2,568.00
135
Davillies Wary Todcr
810.00 877.50
1,04625
810.00
1,080.40
1,080.00
810.001
877.501
783.001
300.007 125.00 350D0 256 -66T --i woo 1 250.001 375,001 228.001 300.00
iNuichl tJt�n 285.00 500.00 450.00 1200.00 560.001 400.40I700.00 280.00 400.00
0 Corrected Total
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
FRM FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO
DATE: March 26, 1991
SUBJECT: WAIVER OF BID PROCEDURE FOR EMERGENCY GENERATOR
The Fire Department proposes to purchase an emergency power generator
for our Station #14 on Kensington, The line item .included in the 90191
Budget that addresses this equipment can be found on Page 104, Account
No. 51-042-02-8020 which provides $6,000. According to our estimates
the funds provided should have covered the purchase of the generator and
installation.
Sealed bids were requested from contractors, but none were received. It
was also determined that Public Works employees would be unable to
install this type of equipment, so that option was not possible. Public
Works put us in contact with Forbes Corporation who offered a bid to
complete the project by providing a generator of sufficient size and
installation for $14,500.00. The additional funds needed for this purchase
can be found in the capital improvement section of FY90191 budget on
Page 211, Account No. 53-077-91-8030.
In the event of a power failure at Station #14 during evening hours,
emergency personnel will not be able to receive emergency dispatch
information. For this reason, I recommend that the bid process be waived
and additional funds be provided that would allow Forbes to receive the
contract.
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
EMC/mah
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MARCH 28, 1991
g Ing I Zra E Q mel �Sffi 0 FJ A 'g
- NW[2243 -1
0 113.1 MOV-19FIVej 9105 1 Cleo wool W h"tolkyjOkyj IRON
I have had conversations with RJN Environmental Associates concerning the proposal for
design engineering services up to pre -final stage for an of the projects that have been
outlined and approved by the Board. There were 12 specific projects that were approved
by the Board with Central/Wa-Pella already being authorized for final design and 11
additional projects.
Of those 11 additional projects, RJN Environmental suggested a fee of $555,000 for all
of the design tasks with an additional $73,000 for flow monitoring and $79,000 for
additional activities such as Plats of Easement, soil borings, permits, approvals and any
and all meetings with other regulatory bodies.
I then requested RJN to review their numbers with a consideration of all of these items
being approved at one time to determine if a cost reduction and benefit would be
available to the Village.
'I'lley reduced the engineering cost by $55,000 and the supplemental costs by $12,000
bringing the total cost down to $640,000. While this sounds like a very large number,
when put in perspective of a $12 million project, one would anticipate that the cost for
just design services itself would exceed 6%. This rate is approximately 4.16% for the
design services. The other costs would be stand-alone and additional costs as they are.
In essence, they are suggesting they would do the design engineering for the Village for
$500,000 and then the flow -monitoring and other supplemental activities would be
additional services.
While it is usually advantageot
more advantages the Village v
Besides the substantial discoui
the concept and who will be
opportunity for an engineer to
on another engineer. RJN we
F have been very pleased
understanding not only the
attached, RJN also indicates
that have been authorized bo
were; sent to Triton Consulti
these projects assigned would
throughout the Village.
Buzz Hill has reviewed this .c
the contract and concurs with
nature. While it is a substanti
Tax and will also give us the
to go if, as and when the St
moving ahead on projects wl
able to bid and take advanta,
I strongly urge the Board to
RJN Environmental at a cost
JFD/rcw
attachment
br us to bid contracts, I feel in I
Id be able to receive by awardi
we also will have one engineer
ing the desigrL This means th
ame any problems or any malfa
I be totally responsible for the
the competency level sho'y
e but our infrastructure. in I
we will not be paying for any
and that they would restate a]
agineers concerning the feasib
the level agreed to for stormwa
iment and had made some mo(
- legal ability for the Village to
contract, funds will be paid back
iportunity to have all the contra
funds are available and give i
funds are available and during
of contracts at a lesser amount.
case there are many
the contract, to RJN.
io has come up with
there will not be an
Toning of the systems
tcome of all projects.
by RJN's staff in
documents that are
plication of services
f the comments that
, of design and that
management control
cations to strengthen
and a contract of this
rough the .25% Sales
; designed and ready
other advantages for
slow economy being
)t the Proposal for Design Engineering Services with
to exceed $640,000.
JOHN FULTON Df
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
March 27, 1991
Mr. John Dixon
Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Subject: Proposal for Design Engineering Services
Stormwater Management Improvements
Dear Mr. Dixon:
In accordance with your request, and our meetings of March 5 and
March 13, 1991, RJN Environmental is pleased to submit this
proposal/agreement for performing design engineering services.
The services are for all projects described in the 1990
RJN Environmental study reports proposed for the Village except
for Weller Creek rehabilitation and the Des Plaines levee system
which may be funded later by other agencies.
The project involves design activities up to but excluding
contractor bidding. In the case of the sanitary sewer area
projects (Fairview Gardens, Hatlen Heights and See-Gwun Avenue
and Milburn Avenue), preliminary design activities of flow
monitoring and SSES activities, if justified by flow monitoring,
are included.
We have incorporated a project schedule for completion of the
design activities in 1991 and 1992 (Section IV of Agreement).
The up front projects for 1991 have been taken into account.
In addition to our standard contract provisions, we have
specifically included the items requested by Herb Weeks in his
letter of March 6, 1991 relative to availability of
reproducibles, background design data, and agency negotiation or
decision documents. We have also incorporated contractual
changes requested by Mr. Buzz Hill, Village attorney.
We have attempted to be as comprehensive in anticipating all
project requirements in terms of scope and effort, realizing that
some items may not be required or as extensive, and others may be
added. Examples of these items are SSES activities in two areas,
and easements which we definitely anticipate in several areas.
202 W. FRONT STREET
WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60187
(708) 682-4777
Mr. John Dixon
March 27, 1991
Page Two
Scope effort and cost have been included for preparation
of the easements. We, of course, expect close coordination with
the Village on all items relative to details, schedules, and
reviews.
In developing the proposal fee for these services, we examined
each of the anticipated project requirements. The estimated fee
and effort for each project if done separately is shown in the
attached Table 1.
It is important to note that approximately $555,600 of the
estimated fee is for typical design tasks, approximately $73,700
for flow monitoring and SSSS activities, and $79,600 for
supplemental design activities such as easement plats, soil
borings, permits and approvals, extra client printing, permits
and approvals, and extraordinary MWRDGC involvement in certain
projects.
In consideration of all activities with economy of scale,
duplication of some tasks, coordination, and similar items, we
have examined the combined effort and project a savings of
approximately $55,000 in the design activities and $11,900 for
monitoring and supplemental tasks with a total reduction of
$66,900 from individual projects. This reduction would result in
a total contract, not -to -exceed amount of $642,000. We propose
this amount with actual compensation on a time and expense basis.
Based on the assumption that this proposal is acceptable, it is
understood by RJN Environmental that this project would be
awarded, in part, because of RJN Environmental's familiarity with
the project, based upon RJN Environmental's Mount Prospect
Comprehensive Stormwater Management Report of November 5, 1990
and RJN Environmental's February 5, 1991 letter responding to
Triton Consulting Engineers, LTD. review of the November 5, 1990
report. It is specifically not within the scope of the agreement
to have the Village of Mount Prospect pay for any duplication of
services, review and preparing the November 5, 1990 report, but
rather to implement the recommendation and policy concepts set
forth in the November 5, 1990 report.
Mr. John Dixon
March 27, 1991
Page Three
We have appreciated the opportunity to provide professional
services and we look forward to further assisting the Village in
the stormwater management improvements. Please contact me if you
have any questions or need further information.
Very truly yours,
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
RichardBodner, Ph.D
Vice
President
RLB:njc
TABLE 1
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
SUMMARY OF EFFORT AND COST
FOR INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS
Estimated Effort
(Manhours)
12rolect
Preliminary, Supplemental
and Design Serviogs
Estimated
Fee
1.
Clearwater Detention Basin
655
$
36,700
Outfall Improvements
2.
Des Plaines River Backwater
261
$
16,000
Control
3.
Prospect Manor and North
2,984
$177,400
Main Street
4.
See-Gwun Avenue and Golf
616
$
35,600
Road Relief Storm Sewer
5.
Stevenson Lane and Thayer
1,044
$
60,100
Storm Sewer
6.
Catalpa Lane and Birch Drive
258
$
16,200
Storm Sewer
7.
Fairview Gardens Subdivision
1,653
$102,700
Sanitary System Improvements
8.
Hatlen Heights Subdivision
709
$
43,500
Storm Sewer Improvements
9.
Hatlen Heights Subdivision
1,348
$
80,900
Sanitary System Improvements -
Design
10.
See-Gwun Avenue and Milburn
1,322
$
79,600
Avenue Stormwater Improvements
11.
See-Gwun Avenue and Milburn
831
$
60,200
TOTAL
11,681
$708,900
AGREEMENT
F-Piefam
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
AND
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
WHEATON, ILLINOIS
THIS AGREEMENT made this day of , 1991 by and
between the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS, hereinafter called
OWNER and RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC., WHEATON, ILLINOIS,
hereinafter called ENGINEER.
WHEREAS, the ENGINEER has completed stormwater management
studies for the OWNER under the terms of engineering Agreements dated
September 7, 1989, and March 13, 1990, and
WHEREAS, the ENGINEER is providing professional engineering
services for design of the initial project consisting of a storm
relief sewer along Wa-Pella Avenue from Central Road to Weller's
Creek, and
WHEREAS, the OWNER desires the ENGINEER and the ENGINEER desires
to perform professional engineering services for implementation of
other stormwater and sanitary system improvements.
NOW, therefore, the OWNER hereby engages the ENGINEER to provide
the following professional services as set forth in this Agreement.
The ENGINEER agrees to furnish and perform various professional
engineering services including preliminary design and design
activities for the following projects;
1. Clearwater Detention Basin Outfall Improvements - Design of
approximately 1,500 linear feet of 66 -inch to 84 -inch
diameter storm sewer from the Clearwater Detention Basin to
the Mount Prospect Country Club Golf Course. Project
includes design for augering beneath Busse Road,
replacement of the existing junction chamber located across
from Estates Drive east of Busse Road, and construction of
a new outfall to the Mt. Prospect County Club Golf Course.
2. Des Plaines River Backwater Control - Design of two
backwater control structures for existing storm sewers
discharging to the Des Plaines River between Woodview Drive
and Seneca Lane.
March 27, 1991 -1-
AGREEMENT (Cont.)
3. Prospect Manor and North Main Street Combined Relief Sewer
Improvements - Design of approximately 9,000 linear feet of
24 -inch to 78 -inch combined relief sewer including augering
beneath Rand Road, a connection to an existing MWRDGC-TARP
drop shaft, and relief sewer overflows between the existing
combined sewer system and the new combined relief sewer
system.
4. See-Gwun Avenue and Golf Road Relief Storm Sewer
Improvements - Design of approximately 1,800 linear feet of
30 -inch to 60 -inch diameter relief storm sewer.
5. Stevenson Lane and Thayer Street Storm Sewer Improvements -
Design of approximately 2,600 linear feet of storm sewer
ranging from 66 -inches to 90 -inches in diameter, and an
outfall structure to the Feehanville Ditch.
6. Catalpa Lane and Birch Drive Storm Sewer Improvements -
Design of approximately 700 linear feet of 24 -inch and
27 -inch diameter storm sewer from the intersection of Catalpa
Lane and Birch Drive to the intersection of Willow Lane and Fern
Drive.
7. Fairview Gardens Subdivision Sanitary System Improvements -
Flow monitoring and investigation of the existing sanitary
sewer system, if necessary, prior to design of improvements
including manhole inspection, smoke testing, dyed water
flooding, and television inspection review. Design of
improvements identified at this time include rehabilitation
or replacement of the existing lift station located in
front of Saint Emily School on Horner Lane, approximately
4,600 linear feet of 8 -inch to 21 -inch diameter sanitary
sewer and 200 feet of 8 -inch diameter force main.
8. Hatlen Heights Subdivision Storm sewer Improvements -
Design of approximately 2,800 linear feet of 18 -inch to
48 -inch diameter storm sewer to convey stormwater from five
low points in the subdivision to an existing 72 -inch
diameter storm sewer.
9. Hatlen Heights Subdivision Sanitary System Improvements -
Flow monitoring and investigation of the existing sanitary
sewer system, if necessary, prior to design of improvements
including manhole inspection, smoke testing, dyed water
flooding, and television inspection review. Design of
improvements identified at this time include modifications
to the existing sanitary relief station located near Rob
Road and design of approximately 3,000 linear feet of
10 -inch to 18 -inch diameter sanitary sewer.
March 27, 1991 -2-
AGREEMENT (Cont.)
10. See-Gwun Avenue and Milburn Avenue Stormwater Improvements
- Design of a 6.6 acre-foot detention basin including a
side flow weir structure and relocation of approximately
800 linear feet of sanitary sewer. Design of approximately
2,100 linear feet of 42 -inch to 60 -inch relief storm sewer.
11. See-Gwun Avenue and Milburn Avenue Sanitary Relief
Station - Flow monitoring of the existing sewer system
prior to design of improvements. Design of improvements
identified at this time includes a 1,300 gallon per minute
sanitary relief station.
The ENGINEER will also provide to the OWNER as part of this Project:
1. Ten (10) sets of project specifications, although documents
may be generic in content, and ten (10) sets of plans for
OWNER'S use and distribution to reviewing agencies.
2. one (1) set of reproducibles for OWNER's future reference
subject to 'Reuse of Documentslin Section VI.
3. Design background data or calculation on any of the
projects if requested by the OWNER at normal copying and
computer charges. Such charges may be an extra.
4. Copies of all correspondence which address reports of any
negotiations or decisions by other government bodies
regarding the projects.
Details of the major work tasks for each project are given in
Attachment A.
The ENGINEER is available to furnish and perform, under a
separately negotiated agreement, future engineering services as
desired and authorized by OWNER for additional planning work, design,
construction engineering services, and testing with respect to
extensions of this Project or others.
The Village Manager, or his designee of the Village of Mount
Prospect shall be the OWNER'S Representative, and is authorized to
act with authority on behalf of the OWNER with respect to all work
tasks of the Project for which services are to be rendered by the
ENGINEER.
March 27, 1991 -3-
AGREEMENT (Cont.)
The ENGINEER will have access to the following provided it is
within the OWNER's possession:
1. All available information pertinent to the Project
including maps, records and any other data relative to the
ENGINEERfs services.
2. Data prepared by or services of others, including without
limitations any previous plans for the sewer system, maps,
and other special data or consultations not covered in
ENGINEER'S Basic services.
3. All criteria and information as to the OWNER's design and
construction standards which the OWNER will require to be
included on the drawings and specifications.
4. Easement requirements of the OWNER.
The OWNER will have the responsibility to use its best efforts
to accomplish the following:
1. Arrange for access to and make all provisions for ENGINEER
to enter upon public property, public easements, private
property as possible, as required for ENGINEER to perform
his services.
2. Secure necessary easements for completion on the work
unless included in ENGINEER'S Basic services or negotiated
for such service with the ENGINEER.
3. Pay for necessary permits for construction activities and
legal advertisements including construction bid
announcements.
4. When deemed necessary by the OWNER, perform television
inspection of designated sewers and cleaning of sewers in
consultation with ENGINEER and with advance scheduling by
the ENGINEER. Provide video tapes to ENGINEER for project
review.
5. Bear all costs incident to compliance with the requirements
of this Section III.
March 27, 1991 -4-
AGREEMENT (Cont.)
Engineering services will be initiated upon receipt of an
executed copy of this Agreement. Based on authorization to proceed
in April, 1991, the ENGINEER will perform the work in accordance with
the schedule below. The schedule is subject to change in
consultation with the OWNER, depending in part, on various
construction funds available.
Estimated
Pro iect Completion Date
1.
Clearwater Detention Basin Outfall
June,
1991
Improvements - Design
2.
Des Plaines River Backwater Control - Design
June,
1991
3.
Prospect Manor and North Main Street - Design
November,
1991
4.
See-Gwun Avenue and Golf Road Relief Storm
December,
1991
Sewer - Design
5.
Stevenson Lane and Thayer Street Storm
June,
1991
Sewer - Design
6.
Catalpa Lane and Birch Drive Storm Sewer -
March,
1992
Design
7.
Fairview Gardens Subdivision Sanitary System
Improvements
A. Flow Monitoring
June,
1991
B. Supplemental Preliminary Design
December,
1991
Activities (SSSS, if required)
C. Design
July,
1992
8.
Hatlen Heights Subdivision Storm Sewer
May,
1992
Improvements - Design
9.
Hatlen Heights Subdivision Sanitary System
Improvements - Design
A. Flow Monitoring
June,
1991
B. Supplemental Preliminary Design
January,
1992
Activities (SSES, if required)
C. Design
September,
1992
10.
See-Gwun Avenue and Milburn Avenue
November,
1992
Stormwater Improvements - Design
11.
See-Gwun Avenue and Milburn Avenue
Sanitary Relief Station
A. Flow Monitoring
June,
1991
B. Design
November,
1992
March 27, 1991 -5-
AGREEMENT (Cont.)
The work described shall be carried out as expeditiously as
weather and other physical conditions permit. The ENGINEER shall not
be liable to the OWNER, if delayed in, or prevented from performing
the work as specified herein through any cause or causes beyond the
control of the ENGINEER, and not caused by his own fault or
negligence including acts of God, or the public enemy, inclement
weather conditions, acts, regulations, or decisions of the Government
or regulatory authorities after the effective date of this Agreement,
fires, floods, epidemics, strikes, jurisdictional disputes, lockouts,
and freight embargoes.
Compensation to the ENGINEER by the OWNER for work set forth in
Section I of this Agreement will not exceed $642,000 without prior
written approval of the OWNER.
Actual compensation to the ENGINEER by the OWNER shall be on a
time and expense basis including personnel hourly charge out rates
applicable at the time the work is performed plus the ENGINEER'S
charges for other direct costs connected with the work. The current
schedule for the ENGINEER for 1991 work is attached as Table 1.
Schedule for subsequent years will be forwarded to the OWNER by the
ENGINEER when available. However, under no circumstances shall the
charges to the OWNER for the work set forth in Section I of the
Agreement and in Attachment A exceed $642,000.
Payments to the ENGINEER shall be made monthly upon receipt of a
combined status report and invoice to be submitted to the OWNER by
the ENGINEER. Invoices shall be due and payable to the ENGINEER
within thirty (30) days of each billing.
Standards of Performange
The ENGINEER shall perform all services under this Agreement in
accordance with the standards of the engineering profession.
Since the ENGINEER has no control over the cost of labor,
materials, or equipment, or over the contractor's method of
determining prices, or over competitive bidding or market conditions,
his opinions of preliminary or probable construction cost or total
project cost provided for herein are to be made on the basis of his
experience and qualifications. These opinions represent his best
judgement as an experienced and qualified professional engineer.
However, the ENGINEER cannot and does not guarantee that actual
project cost will not vary from opinions of cost by him.
March 27, 1991 -6-
AGREEMENT (Cont.d)
HeMS9 of DD-Q-��
All data and documents including drawings, forms, computer
programs, and specifications furnished by the ENGINEER pursuant
to this Agreement are instruments of service with respect to the
Project. They are not intended or represented to be suitable for
reuse by the OWNER or others on extensions of this Project or on
any other project. Any reuse without written verification or
adaptation by the ENGINEER will be at the OWNER's sole risk and
without liability or legal exposure to the ENGINEER.
Verification or adaptation by the ENGINEER may entitle ENGINEER
to further compensation at a rate agreed upon by the OWNER and
the ENGINEER.
Termination of Services
This Agreement may be terminated by either party in the
event of substantial failure. Termination may not be effected
unless the other party is given not less than ten (10) days
written notice (delivered by certified mail), return receipt
requested) of intent to terminate and an opportunity for
consultation with the terminating party.
Upon receipt of a termination action, the ENGINEER shall
promptly discontinue all services affected (unless the notice
directs otherwise) and deliver or otherwise make available to the
OWNER (subject to "Reuse of Documents" provisions) all data,
drawings, specifications, reports, estimates, summaries, and
other information and materials accumulated by the ENGINEER in
performing this Agreement, whether completed or in process. The
OWNER shall compensate the ENGINEER for any reasonable costs the
ENGINEER incurs related to commitments which had become firm
prior to the termination.
trolling Law and Disputes
If any of the provisions of this Agreement are invalid under
any applicable statute or rule of law, they are, to that extent,
deemed omitted. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of
the State of Illinois.
,9ugcessors and Assions
The OWNER and the ENGINEER each binds itself and its
partners, successors, executors, administrators, assigns and
legal representatives to the other party to this Agreement and to
the partners, successors, executors, administrators, assigns and
legal representatives of such other party, in respect to all
covenants, agreements and obligations of this Agreement.
Neither the OWNER nor the ENGINEER shall assign, sublet or
transfer any obligations under this Agreement, or any rights
under or interest in (including, but without limitation, moneys
that may become due or moneys that are due) this Agreement
March 27, 1991 -7-
AGREEMENT (Cont.)
without the written consent of the other, and except to the
extent that the effect of this limitation may be restricted by
law.
Unless specifically stated to the contrary in any written
consent to an assignment, no assignment will release or discharge
the assignor from any duty or responsibility under this
Agreement. Nothing contained in this paragraph shall prevent the
ENGINEER from employing such independent consultants, associates,
and subcontractors as he may deem appropriate to assist him in
the performance of services hereunder. Nothing herein shall be
construed to give any rights or benefits hereunder to anyone
other than the OWNER and the ENGINEER.
IN WITNESS THEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed and their seals to be hereto affixed,
this day of 1991.
For the OWNER:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Name
Title
- For the ENGINEER:
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
Name
Title
March 27, 1991 -8-
AGREEMENT (Cont.)
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
SCHEDULE OF HOURLY FEES AND CHARGES
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
I. Compensation for personnel used in the performance of
engineering services shall be in accordance with the following
hourly fees:
Clapsification Hou ly-Raf&
Principal Engineer
$95.00
Senior Engineer
$70.00
Engineer
$60.00
Field Supervisor
$43.00
Draftsperson
$45.00
Computer Supervisor
$45.00
Field Technician
$33.00
Clerical
$25.00
Travel time will be charged in accordance with the foregoing
schedule.
II. Compensation for expense items and other charges incurred
in connection with the performance of the work shall be in
accordance with the following schedule:
Travel and Lodging Expenses Net Cost
Automobile/Field Vehicle $0.24/mile
Company Field Vehicle $0.40/mile
Outside Equipment Rental, Net Cost plus 105
Laboratory Work, Soils Testing
Analysis, Sub -Consultants,
Testing Supplies, and Printing
III. Use of the in-house computer shall be charged on the basis
of connect time, CPU (Central Processing Unit) time, and disk
storage.
Valid until December, 1991
March 27, 1991 -9-
ATTACHMENT A
Sanitary Sewer and Stormwater System Improvements
Village of Mount Prospect
The scope of services will consist of engineering design for
eleven projects as described in the following paragraphs.
WWIW*.I��13rtwoln;lw.vowfllloy,t T -310,R9
1. Investigate the ownership and permitting requirements
for Weller's Creek and the Mount Prospect Country Club
Golf Course. Evaluate the need for flow restriction in
the Mount Prospect Country Club Golf Course based on
discharge limitations to Weller's Creek.
2. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
3. Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities along the selected route of the
storm relief sewer.
4. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT and
MWRDGC.
5. Obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
6. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
on available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
March 27, 1991 -Al-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
7. Obtain soil borings along the proposed route of the
storm relief sewer. Total number of borings provided
in this Agreement is a maximum of three (3). Soil
borings will be performed by a qualified geotechnical
subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
8. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
9. Provide assistance to the OWNER in acquiring easements
including review of existing plats of survey, surveying
of proposed easements, and preparation of legal
descriptions and revised plats of survey.
10. Obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
11. Design storm relief sewer from the outfall of the
Clearwater Detention Basin east along Lonnquist
Boulevard, and north along the west side of Busse Road
to the Mount Prospect Country Club Golf Course across
from Estates Drive. The storm sewer will be gravity
flow and approximately 1,500 feet in total length.
Project includes design of a new junction chamber on
the east side of Busse Road across from Estates Drive,
connection of existing sewers to the junction chamber,
augering beneath Busse Road, and an outfall to the
Mount Prospect Country Club Golf Course including
erosion control protection at the golf course.
12. Prepare contract plans and specifications. Contract
specifications will contain bidding documents,
contractual documents, and detailed construction
specifications. Contract documents will be prepared in
accordance with R.7N Environmental standard format which
OWNER may review to incorporate any specific
requirements. If OWNER desires new specific sections
to be added to specifications which may conflict with
ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER will
hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such specifications.
Bid documents will require contractor to provide
alternate bids for restoration of the immediate
construction area and full width restoration of roadway
pavement, if desired.
March 27, 1991 -A2-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
13. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
14. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to Illinois Department of Transportation
(IDOT) or other agencies having jurisdiction. The
ENGINEER will perform liaison activities as required to
obtain approvals from regulatory agencies.
15. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the detention
basin outfall improvements.
REEff 071-7m. FTIVOTT711INT-7m. M-Wvzi
1. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
2. Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities at the selected location of the
backwater control structures.
3. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT and
the Army Corps of Engineers.
4. Obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered during construction of the backwater
control structures.
5. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
on available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
6. Obtain soil borings at the proposed locations of the
backwater control structures. Total number of borings
provided in this Agreement is one. Soil borings will
be performed by a qualified geotechnical subconsultant
to the ENGINEER.
March 27, 1991 -A3-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
7. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
8. Provide assistance to the OWNER in acquiring easements
including review of existing plats of survey, surveying
of proposed easements, and preparation of legal
descriptions and revised plats of survey.
9. Obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
10. Design two backwater control structures including
backwater control devices for installation on the
existing storm sewer outfalls to the Des Plaines River
located between Seminole Lane and Woodview Drive.
11. Prepare contract plans and specifications. Contract
specifications will contain bidding documents,
contractual documents, and detailed construction
specifications. Contract documents will be prepared in
accordance with RJN Environmental standard format which
OWNER may review to incorporate any specific
requirements. If OWNER desires new specific sections
to be added to specifications which may conflict with
ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER will
hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such specifications.
Bid documents will require contractor to provide
alternate bids for restoration of the immediate
construction area and full width restoration of roadway
pavement, if desired.
12. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
13. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to Illinois Department of Transportation
(IDOT) or other agencies having jurisdiction. The
ENGINEER will perform liaison activities as required to
obtain approvals from regulatory agencies.
14. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the flood
control improvements.
March 27, 1991 -A4-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
C. Prospeit Manor and North Main Street Combined Relief Sewer
Improvements
1. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
2. Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities along the selected route of the
combined relief sewer.
3. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT and
MWRDGC.
4. Obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm, sanitary and combined sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
5. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
on available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
6. Obtain soil borings along the proposed route of the
combined relief sewer. Total number of borings
provided in this Agreement is a maximum of nine. Soil
borings will be performed by a qualified geotechnical
subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
7. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
8. Provide assistance to the OWNER in acquiring easements
including review of existing plats of survey, surveying
of proposed easements and preparation of legal
descriptions and revised plats of survey.
9. obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
10. Design of combined relief sewers from the intersection
of Forest Avenue and Highland Street east along
Highland Street to Emerson Street, south along Emerson
Street to Gregory Street, and east along Gregory Street
across Rand Road to an existing NWRDGC deep tunnel drop
March 27, 1991 -A5-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
shaft. Project includes design of interconnecting
combined relief sewers from six low points north of
Highland Street and south of Kensington Road, three
combined relief sewer connections from existing
combined sewers on North Main Street, augering beneath
Rand Road, and a connection to an existing MWRDGC drop
shaft. The combined relief sewer will be gravity flow
and approximately 9,000 feet in length.
11. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. Contract specifications will contain
bidding documents, contractual documents, and detailed
construction specifications. Contract documents will
be prepared in accordance with RJN Environmental
standard format which OWNER may review to incorporate
any specific requirements. If OWNER desires new
specific sections to be added to specifications which
may conflict with ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require contractor
to provide alternate bids for restoration of the
immediate construction area and full width restoration
of roadway pavement, if desired.
12. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
13. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to the MWRDGC, IDOT or other agencies
having jurisdiction. The ENGINEER will perform liaison
activities as required to obtain approvals from
regulatory agencies.
14. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the storm
sewer improvements based on the 90 percent complete
plans and specifications.
15. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the OWNER.
Incorporate any specification changes required by the
OWNER or other governmental agencies into the contract
specifications. Modify existing plan sheets as
March 27, 1991 -A6-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
required by the OWNER or other governmental
agencies. Revise the Engineer's Opinion of
Probable Construct Cost as required.
1. Investigate the ownership and permitting requirements
for Weller's Creek. Evaluate need for flow restriction
devices in the outfall of the storm relief sewer based
on discharge limitations to Weller's Creek. If flow
restriction is necessary, the relief storm sewer will
be sized to provide in-line detention.
2. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
3. Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities along the selected route of the
storm relief sewer.
4. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT and
MWRDGC.
5. Obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
6. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
on available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
7. obtain soil borings along the proposed route of the
storm relief sewer. Total number of borings provided
in this Agreement is a maximum of two (2). Soil
borings will be performed by a qualified geotechnical
subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
8. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
9. obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
March 27, 1991 -A7-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
10. Design storm relief sewer along Sunset Road and
Na-Wa-Ta Avenue, interconnecting storm sewer on
See-Gwun Avenue, and a connection to the existing
54 -inch by 88 -inch storm sewer at the intersection of
Lonnquist Boulevard and Na-Wa-Ta Avenue. The storm
sewer will be gravity flow and approximately 1,800 feet
in total length.
11. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. Contract specifications will contain
bidding documents, contractual documents, and detailed
construction specifications. Contract documents will
be prepared in accordance with RJN Environmental
standard format which OWNER may review to incorporate
any specific requirements. If OWNER desires new
specific sections to be added to specifications which
may conflict with ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require contractor
to provide alternate bids for restoration of the
immediate construction area and full width restoration
of roadway pavement, if desired.
12. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
13. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to Illinois Department of Transportation
(IDOT) or other agencies having jurisdiction. The
ENGINEER will perform liaison activities as required to
obtain approvals from regulatory agencies.
14. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the storm
sewer relief improvements based on the 90 percent
complete plans and specifications.
15. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the OWNER.
Incorporate any specification changes required by the
OWNER or other governmental agencies into the contract
specifications. Modify existing plan sheets as
March 27, 1991 -AS-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
required by the OWNER or other governmental agencies.
Revise the Engineer's opinion of Probable Construction
Cost as required.
E. StgMepgon Lane an!d Jhgver Drive Stora Se r Imi2rovements
1. Investigate the ownership and permitting requirements
for the Feehanville Ditch. Evaluate need for flow
restriction devices in the outfall of the storm relief
sewer based on discharge limitations to the Feehanville
Ditch. If flow restriction is necessary, the relief
storm sewer will be sized to provide in-line detention.
2. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
3. Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities along the selected route of the
storm relief sewer.
4. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT.
5. obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
6. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
on available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
7. Obtain soil borings along the proposed route of the
storm relief sewer. Total number of borings provided
in this Agreement is a maximum of four (4). Soil
borings will be performed by a qualified geotechnical
subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
8. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
March 27, 1991 -A9-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
9. Provide to the OWNER assistance in acquiring easements
along Wolf Road including review of existing plats of
survey, surveying of proposed easements, and
preparation of legal descriptions and revised plats of
survey.
10. Obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
11. Design storm relief sewer along Stevenson Lane, Lowden
Lane, and Wolf Road. The storm sewer will be gravity
flow and approximately 2,600 feet in total length.
12. Design a storm sewer outfall to the Feehanville ditch
including backwater control and erosion protection.
13. Prepare contract plans and specifications. Contract
specifications will contain bidding documents,
contractual documents, and detailed construction
specifications. Contract documents will be prepared in
accordance with RJN Environmental standard format which
OWNER may review to incorporate any specific
requirements. If OWNER desires new specific sections
to be added to specifications which may conflict with
ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER will
hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such specifications.
Bid documents will require contractor to provide
alternate bids for restoration of the immediate
construction area and full width restoration of roadway
pavement, if desired.
14. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
15. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to Illinois Department of Transportation
(IDOT) or other agencies having jurisdiction. The
ENGINEER will perform liaison activities as required to
obtain approvals from regulatory agencies.
16. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the storm
sewer improvements.
March 27, 1991 -A10-
F.
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
1. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
2. Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities along the selected route of the
storm relief sewer.
3. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT and
MWRDGC.
4. Obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
5. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
on available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
6. Obtain soil borings along the proposed route of the
storm relief sewer. Total number of borings provided
in this Agreement is a maximum of one (1). Soil
borings will be performed by a qualified geotechnical
subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
7. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
8. Obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
9. Design storm relief sewer from the intersection of
Catalpa Lane and Birch Drive to the intersection of
Fern Drive and Willow Lane. The storm sewer will be
gravity flow and approximately 700 feet in total
length.
10. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. Contract specifications will contain
bidding documents, contractual documents, and detailed
construction specifications. Contract documents will
March 27, 1991 -All-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
be prepared in accordance with RJN Environmental
standard format which OWNER may review to incorporate
any specific requirements. If OWNER desires new
specific sections to be added to specifications which
may conflict with ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require contractor
to provide alternate bids for restoration of the
immediate construction area and full width restoration
of roadway pavement, if desired.
11. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
12. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to governmental agencies having
jurisdiction. The ENGINEER will perform liaison
activities as required to obtain approvals from
regulatory agencies.
13. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the storm
sewer improvements based on the 90 percent complete
plans and specifications.
14. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the OWNER.
Incorporate any specification changes required by the
OWNER or other governmental agencies into the contract
specifications. Modify existing plan sheets as
required by the OWNER or other governmental agencies.
Revise the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction
Cost as required.
March 27, 1991 -Al2-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
1. Preliminary Design - Flow Monitoring
a. Install one continuously recording flow meter and
one continuously recording rain gauge unless
already provided for another project area of this
Agreement for a period of 60 days in the Fairview
Gardens Subdivision to verify peak wet weather
flow quantities used for preliminary sizing of the
sanitary sewers, lift station, force main and wet
well prior to initiating design improvements.
b. Prepare and submit ten (10) draft copies of a
preliminary design report that would include
presentation of flow monitoring results and their
impact on preliminary sizing of sanitary sewer,
lift station, wet well, and force main.
C. Meet with the OWNER's staff to discuss the draft
preliminary design report and incorporate
revisions required by the OWNER.
d. Prepare and submit ten (10) copies of the final
preliminary design report to the OWNER for the
OWNER's use and distribution to appropriate
government agencies such as the NWRDGC.
e. Initiate SSSS preliminary design activities or
design activities after receiving written
authorization by the OWNER.
2. Preliminary Design - SSES
a. Comprehensive manhole inspection will be performed
on approximately 59 manholes to collect
infiltration and inflow data and to determine
overall structural condition. A visual pipe
inspection will be performed for each sewer pipe
entering and leaving each manhole. The manhole
rim to invert distance will be measured. The
manhole and visual pipe inspection data will be
input into a computer management system to
quantify recorded observations.
March 27, 1991 -A13-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
b. Smoke testing will be performed on approximately
15,500 linear feet of sewer in the Fairview
Gardens Subdivision. A dual blower intensive
smoke testing technique will be used to locate
leaks in the sanitary sewer system and potential
interconnections between the storm sewer system
and sanitary sewer system. Suggested public
notices will be prepared for the OWNER and door
tag flyers will be distributed prior to initiating
smoke testing. Smoke testing data will be input
into a computer data base management system to
quantify observations. The data will also be
reviewed for selection of dyed water flooding
locations.
C. Dyed water flooding will be performed in
conjunction with television inspection at
locations based on results of smoke testing and
review of sewer maps. Potential cross
connections, selective storm sewers, driveway
drains, drainage ditches, and ponding areas
located above or near sanitary sewers will be dyed
water flooded.
It is assumed at this time that 10 dyed water
tests and 2,000 linear feet of television
inspection will be required. Television
inspection may not be required at all dyed water
test locations based upon discretion by the
ENGINEER.
It is assumed at this time that the OWNER will
provide the equipment and personnel required to
televise the sanitary sewer lines and the ENGINEER
will provide the equipment and personnel to
perform the dyed water flooding. Review of
television inspection activities will be performed
by the ENGINEER. Dyed water flooding and
television inspection data will be input into a
computer data base to quantify observations.
d. Prepared and submit ten (10) draft copies of a
supplemental preliminary design report that would
include presentation of manhole inspection, smoke
testing, and dyed water flooding in conjunction
with television results and their impact on
March 27, 1991 -A14-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
preliminary sizing of sanitary sewer, lift
station, wet well, and force main.
e. Meet with the OWNER's staff to discuss the draft
supplemental preliminary design report and
incorporate revisions as requested by the OWNER.
f. Prepare and submit ten (10) final copies of the
supplemental preliminary design report to the
OWNER for the OWNER's use and distribution to
appropriate governmental agencies such as the
MWRDGC and IEPA.
9- Initiate final design activities after receiving
written authorization by the OWNER.
3. Design
a. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and
specific project requirements.
b. Collect and review utility atlases and record
drawings for existing facilities along the
selected route of the storm relief sewer.
C. Collect and review available reports, plans and
similar information from governmental agencies
such as IDOT and MWRDGC.
d. obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters
of storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
e. Determine existing utility locations and routings
based on available information and coordinate with
public utility companies.
f. obtain soil borings; along the proposed route of
the storm relief sewer. Total number of borings
provided in this Agreement is a maximum of three.
Soil borings will be performed by a qualified
geotechnical subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
March 27, 1991 -A15-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
g. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
h. obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of
plan sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
i. Design sanitary relief sewers along Stevenson Lane
from Small Lane to Thayer Street, along Thayer
Street from Stevenson Lane to Horner Lane, and
along Horner Lane from Thayer Street to the
existing lift station located on Horner Lane
between Henry Street and Central Road and along
Central Road from Horner Lane to Rand Road. The
sanitary sewer will be gravity flow and
approximately 4,600 feet in total length.
j. Design a lift station to replace the existing lift
station located between Central Road and Henry
Street on Horner Lane. Project includes design of
new force main, a new wet well, a separate power
supply, and lift station controls and telemetry
including a high water level alarm and a power
failure alarm. If technically and economically
justifiable, equipment and materials salvaged from
the existing station and wet well including the
existing lift station structure will be
incorporated into the design.
k. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. Contract specifications will
contain bidding documents, contractual documents,
and detailed construction specifications.
Contract documents will be prepared in accordance
with RJN Environmental standard format which OWNER
may review to incorporate any specific
requirements. If OWNER desires new specific
sections to be added to specifications which may
conflict with ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require
contractor to provide alternate bids for
restoration of the immediate construction area and
full width restoration of roadway pavement, if
desired.
March 27, 1991 -A16-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
1. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifies such as
traffic control, restoration, backfill, and
construction materials.
M. Prepare construction permit applications for the
OWNER for submittal to the MWRDGC, IEPA, IDOT, or
other agencies having jurisdiction. The ENGINEER
will perform liaison activities as required to
obtain approvals from regulatory agencies.
n. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an
Engineer's opinion of Probable Construction Cost
for the sanitary sewer and lift station
improvements based on the 90 percent complete
plans and specifications.
0. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the
OWNER. Incorporate any specification changes
required by the OWNER or other governmental
agencies into the contract specifications. Modify
existing plan sheets as required by the OWNER or
other governmental agencies. Revise the
Engineer's opinion of Probable Construction Cost
as required.
1. Meet with OWNERS staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
2. Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities along the selected route of the
storm relief sewer.
3. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT and
MWRDGC.
March 27, 1991 -A17-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
4. obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
5. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
on available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
6. obtain soil borings along the proposed route of the
storm relief sewer. Total number of borings provided
in this Agreement is a maximum of four (4). Soil
borings will be performed by a qualified geotechnical
subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
7. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
8. Provide assistance to the OWNER in acquiring easements
along the selected route of the storm relief sewer
including review of existing plats of survey, surveying
of proposed easements, and preparation of legal
descriptions and revised plats of survey.
9. obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
10. Design storm relief sewer from five low points in the
Hatlan Heights Subdivision to the existing 72 -inch
diameter storm sewer located north of Bonita Avenue and
south of Central Road. The storm sewer will be gravity
flow and approximately 2,800 feet in total length.
11. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. Contract specifications will contain
bidding documents, contractual documents, and detailed
construction specifications. Contract documents will
be prepared in accordance with RJN Environmental
standard format which OWNER may review to incorporate
any specific requirements. If OWNER desires new
specific sections to be added to specifications which
may conflict with ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require contractor
March 27, 1991 -A18-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
to provide alternate bids for restoration of the
immediate construction area and full width restoration
of roadway pavement, if desired.
12. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
13. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to governmental agencies having
jurisdiction. The ENGINEER will perform liaison
activities as required to obtain approvals from
regulatory agencies.
14. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the storm
sewer improvements based on the 90 percent complete
plans and specifications.
15. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the OWNER.
Incorporate any specification changes required by the
OWNER or other governmental agencies into the contract
specifications. Modify existing plan sheets as
required by the OWNER or other governmental agencies.
Revise the Engineer's Opinion of Probable Construction
Cost as required.
�%, �7- MX.71 4 Q
1. Preliminary Design - Flow Monitoring
a. Install one continuously recording flow meter and
one continuously recording rain gauge unless
already provided for another project area of this
Agreement for a period of 60 days in the Hatlen
Heights Subdivision to verify peak wet weather
flow quantities used for preliminary sizing of the
sanitary sewers, lift station, force main, and wet
well prior to initiating design improvements.
March 27, 1991 -A19-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
b. Prepare and submit ten (10) draft copies of a
preliminary design report that would include
presentation of flow monitoring results and their
impact on preliminary sizing of sanitary sewer,
lift station, wet well, and force main.
C. Meet with the OWNER's staff to discuss the draft
preliminary design report and incorporate
revisions as requested by the OWNER.
d. Prepare and submit ten (10) copies of the final
preliminary design report to the OWNER for the
OWNER's use and distribution to appropriate
government agencies such as the MWRDGC.
e. Initiate supplementary preliminary design
activities or final design activities after
receiving written authorization by the OWNER.
2. Preliminary Design - SSES
a. Comprehensive manhole inspection will be performed
on approximately 86 manholes to collect
linfiltration and inflow data and to determine
overall structural condition. A visual pipe
inspection will be performed for each sewer pipe
entering and leaving each manhole. The manhole
rim to invert distance will be measured. The
manholes and visual pipe inspection data will be
input into a computer management system to
quantify recorded observations.
b. Smoke testing will be performed on approximately
18,000 linear feet of sewer in the Hatlen Heights
subdivision. A dual blower intensive smoke
testing technique will be used to locate leaks in
the sanitary sewer system and potential
interconnections between the storm sewer system
and sanitary sewer system. Suggest public notices
will be prepared for the Owner and door tag flyers
will be distributed prior to initiating smoke
testing. Smoke testing data will be input into a
computer database management system to quantify
observations. The data will also be reviewed for
selection of dyed water flooding locations.
March 27, 1991 -A20-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
C. Dyed water flooding will be performed in
conjunction with television inspection at
locations based on results of smoke testing and
review of sewer maps. Potential cross
connections, selective storm sewers, driveway
drain, drainage ditches, and ponding areas located
above or near sanitary sewers will be dyed water
flooded.
It is assumed that 15 dyed water tests and 2,000
linear feet of television inspection will be
required. Television inspection may not be
required at all locations based upon discretion by
the ENGINEER.
It is assumed at this time that the OWNER will
provide the equipment and personnel required to
televise the sanitary sewer lines and the ENGINEER
will provide the equipment and personnel to
perform the dyed water flooding. Review of
television inspection activities will be performed
by the ENGINEER. Dyed water flooding and
television inspection data will be input into a
computer database to quantify observations.
d. Prepare and submit ten (10) draft copies of a
supplemental preliminary design report that would
include presentation of manhole inspection, smoke
testing, and dyed water flooding in conjunction
with television results and their impact on
preliminary sizing of sanitary sewer, lift
station, wet well, and force main.
e. Meet with the owner's staff to discuss the draft
supplemental preliminary design report and
incorporate revisions as requested by the Owner.
f. Prepare and submit ten (10) final copies of the
supplemental preliminary design report to the
Owner for the Owners use and distribution to
appropriate governmental agencies such as the
MWRDGC and IEPA.
g. Initiate final design activities after receiving
written authorization by the owner.
March 27, 1991 -A21-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
3. Design
a. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and
specific project requirements.
b. Collect and review utility atlases and record
drawings for existing facilities along the
selected route of the sanitary sewer and at or
near the existing sanitary relief station located
on Lincoln Street east of Rob Road.
C. Collect and review available reports, plans and
similar information from governmental agencies
such as IDOT and MWRDGC.
d. Obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters
of storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
e. Determine existing utility locations and routings
based on available information and coordinate with
public utility companies.
f. obtain soil borings along the proposed route of
the storm relief sewer. Total number of borings
provided in this Agreement is a maximum of four
(4). Soil borings will be performed by a
qualified geotechnical subconsultant to the
ENGINEER.
g. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
h. obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of
plan sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
i. Design sanitary relief sewers along Hatlen Avenue
from Bonita Avenue to Lincoln Street and along
Lincoln Street from Hatlen Avenue to the existing
relief station located east of Rob Road. Design
includes augering beneath Busse Road. The
sanitary sewer will be gravity flow and
approximately 3,000 feet in total length.
March 27, 1991 -A22-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
J. Design of modifications to the existing sanitary
relief pumping station, wet well, and force main
located on Lincoln Street east of Rob Road
required to retain and convey wastewater to the
MWRDGC interceptor located on Lincoln Street.
Electrical design will be performed by a qualified
electrical subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
k. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. contract specifications will
contain bidding documents, contractual documents,
and detailed construction specifications.
Contract documents will be prepared in accordance
with RJN Environmental standard format which OWNER
may review to incorporate any specific
requirements. If OWNER desires new specific
sections to be added to specifications which may
conflict with ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require
contractor to provide alternate bids for
restoration of the immediate construction area and
full width restoration of roadway pavement, if
desired.
1. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as
traffic control, restoration, backfill, and
construction materials.
M. Prepare construction permit applications for the
OWNER for submittal to the MWRDGC, IEPA, IDOT, or
other agencies having jurisdiction. The ENGINEER
will perform liaison activities as required to
obtain approvals from regulatory agencies.
n. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an
Engineer's opinion of Probable Construction Cost
for the sanitary sewer and relief station
improvements based on the 90 percent complete
plans and specifications.
0. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the
Owner. Incorporate any specification changes
March 27, 1991 -A23-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
required by the OWNER or other governmental
agencies into the contract specifications.
Modify existing plan sheets as required by the
OWNER or other governmental agencies. Revise the
Engineer's opinion of Probable Construction Cost
as required.
1. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and specific
project requirements.
Collect and review utility atlases and record drawings
for existing facilities along the selected route of the
storm relief sewer.
3. Collect and review available reports, plans and similar
information from governmental agencies such as IDOT and
MWRDGC.
4. obtain ground profile and elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewers which will be
encountered along the selected route of the sewer.
5. Determine existing utility locations and routings based
an available information and coordinate with public
utility companies.
6. obtain soil borings along the proposed route of the
storm relief sewer. Total number of borings provided
in this Agreement is a maximum of three (3). Soil
borings will be performed by a qualified geotechnical
subconsultant to the ENGINEER.
7. Investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which are or may be required.
March 27, 1991 -A24-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
8. Provide assistance to the OWNER in acquiring easements
including an easement on the property located south of
Milburn Avenue, east of We -Go Trail, north of Lincoln
Street, and east of Can-Dota Avenue in the Village of
Mount Prospect. Assistance will include review of
existing plats of survey, surveying of proposed
easements, and preparation of legal descriptions and
revised plats of survey.
9. Obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of plan
sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
10. Design storm relief sewer from approximately the east
cul-de-sac of Whitegate Drive to approximately the
intersection of See-Gwun Avenue and Milburn Avenue.
The storm sewer will be gravity flow and approximately
1,900 feet in total length.
11. Design a 6.6 acre-foot above ground detention facility
including a side -flow wier, approximately 200 feet of
gravity flow storm sewer, and relocation of
approximately 800 feet of gravity flow sanitary sewer
on the property located south of Milburn Avenue and
north of Lincoln Street between We -Go Trail and Can-
Dota Avenue.
12. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
13. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to governmental agencies having
jurisdiction. The ENGINEER will perform liaison
activities as required to obtain approvals from
regulatory agencies.
14. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the storm
sewer improvements.
15. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. Contract specifications will contain
bidding documents, contractual documents, and detailed
construction specifications. Contract documents will
be prepared in accordance with RdN Environmental
March 27, 1991 -A25-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
standard format which OWNER may review to incorporate
any specific requirements. If OWNER desires new
specific sections to be added to specifications which
may conflict with ENGINEER'S specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require contractor
to provide alternate bids for restoration of the
immediate construction area and full width restoration
of roadway pavement, if desired.
16. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as traffic
control, restoration, backfill, and construction
materials.
17. Prepare construction permit applications for the OWNER
for submittal to the NWRDGC, IEPA, IDOT, or other
agencies having jurisdiction. The ENGINEER will
perform liaison activities as required to obtain
approvals from regulatory agencies.
18. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an Engineer's
Opinion of Probable Construction Cost for the storm
sewer improvements based on the 90 percent complete
plans and specifications.
19. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the Owner.
Incorporate any specification changes required by the
Owner or other governmental agencies into the contract
specifications. Modify existing plan sheets as
required by the OWNER or other governmental agencies.
Revise the ENGINEER's opinion of Probable Construct
Cost as required.
1. Preliminary Design
a. Install one continuously recording flow monitor
and one continuously recording rain gauge unless
provided for another project area of this
Agreement for a period of 60 -days in the See-Gwun
Avenue and Milburn Avenue Area to verify peak wet
weather flow quantities used for preliminary
March 27, 1991 -A26-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
sizing of the sanitary relief station prior to
initiating design of the station.
b. Prepare and submit ten (10) copies of a draft
preliminary design report that would include
presentation of flow monitoring results and their
impact on preliminary relief station sizing and
sanitary sewer system requirements prior to
initiating design.
0. Meet with the Owner's staff to discuss the
preliminary design report and incorporate any
revisions required by the OWNER.
d. Submit ten (10) copies of the final preliminary
design report to the OWNER for the OWNER'S use and
distribution to appropriate government agencies
such as the MWRDGC.
e. Initiate final design activities after receiving
written authorization from the OWNER.
2. Design
a. Meet with OWNER'S staff to obtain additional
information on existing system facilities and
specific project requirements.
b. Collect and review utility atlases and record
drawings for existing facilities located at or
near the selected location for the sanitary relief
station.
C. Collect and review available reports, plans and
similar information from governmental agencies
such as the MWRDGC.
d. obtain ground profile elevations and diameters of
storm sewers and sanitary sewer which are located
on the selected relief station site.
e. Determine existing utility locations and routings
based on available information and coordinate with
public utility companies.
March 27, 1991 -A27-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
f. obtain soil borings at the proposed location of
the relief station. Total number of borings
provided in this Agreement is a maximum of one
(1). Soil borings will be performed by a
qualified geotechnical subconsultant to the
ENGINEER.
9- investigate the need for temporary or permanent
easements. Prepare a letter report describing
easements which may be required.
h. Provide assistance to the OWNER in acquiring
easements at the relief station site including
review of existing plats of survey, surveying of
proposed easements, and preparation of legal
descriptions and revised plats of survey.
i. obtain mylar aerial base sheets for preparation of
plan sheets at a scale of 1 -inch equals 50 feet.
j. Design a sanitary relief pumping station including
a wet well, force main, automatic check valve, and
telemetry capable of transmitting high water and
power failure alarms to a location specified by
the OWNER. Electrical design will be performed by
a qualified electrical subconsultant to the
ENGINEER.
k. Prepare 90 percent complete contract plans and
specifications. Contract specifications will
contain bidding documents, contractual documents,
and detailed construction specifications.
contract documents will be prepared in accordance
with RJN Environmental standard format which OWNER
may review to incorporate any specific
requirements. If OWNER desires new specific
sections to be added to specifications which may
conflict with ENGINEEROS specifications, the OWNER
will hold ENGINEER harmless for use of such
specifications. Bid documents will require
contractor to provide alternate bids for
restoration of the immediate construction area and
full width restoration of roadway pavement, if
desired.
March 27, 1991 -A28-
ATTACHMENT A (Cont.)
1. Meet with OWNER'S staff to present the contract
documents and discuss project specifics such as
traffic control, restoration, backfill, and
construction materials.
M. Prepare construction permit applications for the
OWNER for submittal to the TEPA, MWRDGC, or other
agencies having jurisdiction. The ENGINEER will
perform liaison activities as required to obtain
approvals from regulatory agencies.
n. Perform a quantity take off and prepare an
Engineer's opinion of Probable Construction Cost
for construction of the sanitary relief station
based on the 90 percent complete plans and
specifications.
0. Prepare 100 percent complete contract plans and
specifications based upon authorization by the
OWNER. Incorporate any specification changes
required by the OWNER or other governmental
agencies into the contract specifications. Modify
existing plan sheets as required by the OWNER or
other governmental agencies. Revise the
Engineer's opinion of Probable Construction Cost
as required.
March 27, 1991 -A29-
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director
DATE: March 27, 1991
SUBJECT: Financial Consultant and Bond Counsel for 1991 Bond Issue
In anticipation of a possible bond issue in December 1990 for a new Fire and Police
Building, I requested proposals from R. V. Norene & Associates, Inc. to provide
financial consulting services and from Lewis Greenbaum of Katten, Muchin & Zavis to
provide services as bond counsel. R-'' orene has been the Village's financial
consultant since 1982, and Lew GreenL nas been the Village's Bond Counsel since
1985. 1 have been very satisfied with the work of both of these individuals.
The proposal from R. V. Norene is based upon a minimum fee of $4,500 plus $2.75 per
$1,000 par amount for all bonds delivered in excess of $1,000,000. This is the same
rate that R. V. Norene charged for the 1987 and 1988 bond issues. Mr. Greenbaum
originally proposed a fee of $6,200 for a $4.3 million issue, but the actual fee will
be dependent upon the size of the bond issue and the purpose of the bonds. I will
obtain a firm quote from Mr. Greenbaum after the amunt of the issue is determined.
It is our expectation that the bond sale will include $4,000,000 for the Fire and
Police Building, up to $2,880,000 for flood projects, and an estimated $520,000 for
Downtown Redevelopment. A schedule of the tentative amounts to be included in the
bond issue is attached. By including the bonds for Downtown Redevelopment with the
other projects, we should be able to sell the TIF portion as tax-exempt bonds rather
than taxable bonds. The savings over the life of the bonds should amount to about
$98,000.
This is an excellent time to go to the bond market with rates currently in the range
of 6.48 - 6.58. Because we would like to move as quickly as possible to take
advantage of these rates, I am requesting that the proposals be accepted at the April
3, 1991 Village Board meeting. The details of the bond issue will be worked out after
the referendum with a tentative sale date of May 7, 1991. A copy of the proposal from
R. V. Norene & Associates, Inc. is attached.
DCJ/sm
Enclosures
VILLAGE OY -ROWT W(MECIL
Fire and Police Building
Flood Control:
Des Plaines River Backflow
Stevenson/Thayer Area
Clearwater Park Area
Engineering Studies:
Facilities Plan
Rate Study
Stormwater Study
Additional Studies
Central/WaP611a
All Other Areas
Downtown Redevelopment
V & G Parking Lot
V & G Improvements
Other D/T Redevelopment
1991 G. 0. Bonds
$ 35,000
22,500
128,500
8,500
44,500
641 0-00
$ 100,000
1,300,000
600,000
880_000
115,000
35,000
---270--O-q–o
$4,000,000
2,880,000
Total 1,7.4 () 0 �Q 0(,7
V. NORENE & Associates, Inc. -
1ANCIAL ADVISORY SERVICES PROPOS,
FOR THE
LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINO1
OCTOBER 15, 1990
LaKe & Waukiecan Office Center Suite 215 - 1701 Lake Avenue • Glenview, IL 60025
708-998-9648 • FAX 708-9985503
R
Fil
v, NORENE & Associates, Inc. —
October 15, 1990
President and Board
of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect
Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illincis 60056
Re: Funding of Public Safety
Facility
Ladies and Gentlemen:
We understand that you propose to issue, subject to referendum
approval on November 6, 1990, $4,000,000 of general obligations bonds to
pay -the cost of a new public safety facility. We are pleased to offer our
financial advisory services to establish a, financing program and
successfully market and deliver the necessary bonds. An outline of the
steps we feel will be necessary in connection with each sale follows but,
in any event, our services will be complete and will be designed to reduce
the financing costs of the project and to enhance the Village's standing in
the financial community.
1. We will immediately familiarize ourselves with the project through
meetings with your staff, your other consultants and your
attorneys and based thereon establish the necessary tentative
financing tinetable so that close coordination will be ensured in
the legal and financial aspects of the financing.
2.
We will submit estimates to you of the annual debt service cost
and will make recommendations regarding the financial plan
including traditional financing vehicles and, where applicable,
the use of a form of credit enhancement (bond insurance or
letter/line of credit), etc. These recommendations will be based
upon our review of your existing indebtedness and their
authorizing ordinances, your future bonding needs and the
municipal bond market.
We will submit recommended debt retirement schedules for your
approval. Based upon the agreed upon financing plan, we will meet
with civic groups as you request to explain the financing impact.
We will review the existing reports of your other consultants and,
where applicable, make recommendations regarding changes therein
to ensure financial feasibility.
We will specify financial provisions including prior redemption
rights to be included in the legal proceedings for a most
attractive and successful financing. These provisions will be
designed to assure the Village of its ability to complete the
financing of all of its future needs.
Lake & Viaukegan Office Center, Suite 215 • 170' Lake Avenue • Gienviev%. IL 60025
708-998-9648 - FAX 738-998-c503
R. V. NOREN E & Associates, Inc. —
6. We will research the financial information and economic data
bearing upon you as an issuer and the successful marketing of the
bonds and will ass ' emble same, together with the details of the
bonds, into an attractive Official Statement which will allow you
to satisfy the market's current requirements for full disclosure.
The Official Statement will be submitted to you for approval prior
to its distribution.
7. We will advise you of the, marketing procedures and specifically
recommend the time, place and method of conducting the bid opening
and sale of the bonds.
8. when a bond bid opening date has been established, we will:
a, arrange for the publication of the notice(s), of sale in the
national financial press.
b, make a recommendation relative to the advisability of obtaining
an investment rating and, if you elect to request one, we shall
make application on your behalf including preparation of the
necessary information.
c. recommend whether you should make application for municipal
bond insurance and, if it is decided to make such application,
w I e shall submit the necessary information.
d. distribute the Official Statement to a broad list of
prospective bidders, investment advisors and investing
institutions.
e. solicit additional bidders by contacting prospective bidders in
advance of the sale to ensure that there are no unanswered
questions regarding the issue.
9. We will attend the bid opening where we will conduct the sale,
check the bids for accuracy and advise you of the acceptability of
the best bid received.
10. We will prepare and distribute the Final Official Statement in
accordance with Securities and Exchange Commission Rule 15c2-12.
11. we will assist in and coordinate all details leading up to the
delivery of the bonds, including the printing of the bonds and
calculating the amount due at delivery.
12. Upon completion of the delivery of your bonds, we shall compute a
record of payments of principal and interest and provide you with
a convenient reference summary of the financing.
We shall have no interest in the purchase or resale of your
obligations nor shall we engage in any other activity which may constitute
a conflict of interest with performance of our services for you. We will
not obligate you for any expenses except with your approval.
You will be responsible for the fees of your attorneys, bond counsel,
engineers /architects/planners and are to pay all of yourordinary expenses
including advertising, printing and distribution of Official Statements,
the purchase (if applicable) of a rating for the bonds, the purchase (if
applicable) of municipal bond insurance or other credit enhancement, bond
R.,q. %ORENE & M%mMes, \M, — ...............................
registrar/paying agent fees and printing and delivery of the bonds. We
will assist you by arranging for the advertisement of the sale in the
national financial press and, where applicable, will obtain competitive
bids on the necessary printing.
For our services we are to be paid a fee which shall include our own
ordinary expenses, our necessary travel expenses between Mount
Prospect/Glenview/Chicago and our services in full which, in addition to
those outlined in this Agreement, shall include all necessary and usual
functions to complete the financing. la the event it is deemed necessary
to travel to New York City in connection with the Village's application for
an investment rating, we are to be reimbursed for our out-of-pocket
expenses and travel costs. Our fee is to be based upon the par amount of
bonds delivered and calculated as follows: A minimum fee for each bond
sale of.$4,500 plus $2.75 per $1,000 par amount for all bonds delivered in
excess of $1,000,000.
Our fee is to be due at the time of the award of the low bond bid and
payable upon 'receipt of the proceeds of the issue. If for any reason no
bond award is made, no fee shall be due. While this Agreement is intended
to expire upon the completion of the last financing for the presently
contemplated project, the Village is given the option of extending the
terms hereof to any general obligation financing that occurs within 24
months of the last sale contemplated herein.
Respectfully submitted,
e1%
VPresident
R. V. Norene & Associates, Inc.
RVN/S
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The above proposal accepted by the Village of Mount Prospect this
— day of 1990. You are instructed to proceed.
Attest:
Village Clerk
- 3 -
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, IL
Village President