The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4208_001Next Ordinance No. 4280 01 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Next Resolution No. 11-91' A G E N D A ANNOMMMUNNINNEW VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S March 19, 19� REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday Senior Citizen Center March 19, 1991 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER Ii. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald"'Skipll Parley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Donald Weibel III. INVOCATION - Trustee Arthur IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, MARCH 5, 1991 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD A. Citizens' Committee in support of the Fire and Police Station Referendum update. VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. Presentation of Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to David C. Jepson B. PROCLAMATION: Senior celebration, May ist at Randhurst C. Introduction of newly elected officers of Mount Prospect.Police Explorers' Post D. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE This ordinance authorizes the creation of one additional Class llRll liquor license for Nina Restaurant to be located within the Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center, Golf & Busse Roads. (Exhibit A) E. Request to allow the new owners of Mr. Peters to continue operation under the existing Class "Ell liquor license and the new owners of Liquor Shoppe, 1728 W. Dempster Street, to continue A, operation under the existing Class "C" liquor license, to be known as Jay Liquor. F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance amends the Code to permit non- alcoholic items to be sold at a liquor counter in larger grocery stores. (Exhibit B) VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. 1st reading of ANTI DINANCE AMENDING ORDINA*' NO. 4164 FOR PROPE'RrY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ,�,- 215 EAST PROSPECTS ENUE l; This Ordinance ext ds the time period for variations granten Ordinance No. 4164 for' one additional yep (Exhibit C) all r 1, B. 1st reading of AN DINANCE AMENDING ORDIN NO. 4170 FOR PROP Y COMMONLY KNOWN AS 7 SOUTH EDWARD STT This Ordinance ex„lends the time period for 'f r, variations grantetn Ordinance No. 4170 fob; one additional ye"°rr, (Exhibit D) IX. NEW BUSINESS l A. ZBA 9-V-91, 1625 last Dogwood Lane The Petitioner is,�equesting variations to allow an accessor� fuilding 13 feet in heigt , rather than the pi itted 10 feet; to allowlli; wo accessory buildin ', on one lot; to allow ard,8" sideyard, ratheran the minimum of 5 feet��and, to allow a one fo, separation between the 1,111 principal structure'; and an accessory buildi,�, rather than the 16lrfeet required. The Zons�, Board of Appeals � ted to deny the variatio to allow 13 foot ta1'��accessory building by a �te u of 3-3; to approvJill'two accessory buildings��iy a vote of 6-0; to 40' the relocation of t e shed resulting in an IoIIs sideyard by a vote of 5M� ; arid, to approval a one!foot separation by a voted/N`f 5-1. B. ZBA 10-V-91, 1715 E�obbie Lane ififlk The Petitioner isVequesting a variation tdfallow a driveway width +bf 28' l0” at the widest pi61,int to accommodate aniexisting patio. The'Zonxh`q Board of Appeals recommended granting this requeAa vote of 6-0. f' C. ZBA 6-Z-9.1 and Z !ll -V-91, 412 and 414 E ��and Road 1. The Petitio' is requesting the subs, property be11" zoned from R-1 (Single� ily) to 'B-2 (Bush. ass Office) in order to cc4struct an office bding. Also requested 1'r►a variation t� w ive the required loads ' 11 space. The Zoning B c%xd 'of Appeals recommend' - granting th rezoning by a vote of 6 land the variatia,-by a vote of 5-1. 2. Request to nd the Comprehensive Pl" The Petitio a� has requested the Compensive Plan be amerdid to reflect General Co ercial/ Office rathd', than Single Family on tf subject prooptty. The Plan Commission recommendsgranting this amendment by ; vote of 8-0 �% 3. Request for!t"" from the Devo opment Code (Chapt16)` The Petitioa is requesting a mo�difietion from the Dee41 opment Code (Chapter 16,19(lto waive the rrement to install strep11 lights. Th'm/1,11/', etitioner has agreed eed to; inter into a Rest ' Covenant guarantee the install'4,on of the required str,;; lights at ay,ture date. The Plan C f!„ fission recottendsn�nting� this modi�ficatloa� a vote of 8-01b4sed on the execution of"�e Restrictivel;Covenant.<<` r; D. ZBA 12-V-91, 230 - 240 East Lincoln Street The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a 5 foot interior sideyard for a parking lot, rather than the required 10 feet; a 15 foot front yard for parking, rather than the required 30 feet; and, to waive the required loading space. The Petitioner would like to construct a new industrial building on the subject property. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these variations by a vote of 6-0. E. ZBA 13-A-91, Text Amendment The Zoning Board of Appeals requested specific amendments to the Fence Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this amendment by a vote of 5-1. F. Request for a field change to the Old Orchard Lexington Development to permit townhomes or manorhomes, rather than being restricted to townhomes. G. Plat of Subdivision - Lake Center Plaza H. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 16 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance amends the language governing Recaptures. The Plan Commission recommends approving this amendment by a vote of 8-0. (Exhibit E) I. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance adopts Chapter 95-1/2 "Illinois Vehicle Code" of the Illinois State Statutes by reference. (Exhibit F) J. Motion to change the regular meeting of the Village Board from April 2, 1991 (Election Day) to Wednesday, April 3, 1991. K. Review Village Manager's compensation X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT A. Taxi cab service review B. Status Report XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT M MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND.BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MARCH 5, 1991 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Village Clerk Carol A. Fields called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Tim Corcoran (arrived late) Trustee Leo Floros Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Donald Weibel Absent: Mayor Farley Nominations were requested for President Pro Tem. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to nominate Trustee Leo Floras as President Pro Tem. There were no other nominations. The roll -call for seating Trustee Floros as President Pro Tem was as follows: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried and Trustee Floros took his seat as President Pro Tem. INVOCATION The invocation was given by President Pro Tem Floros. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to APPROVE approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of the MINUTES Mayor and Board of Trustees held February 19, 1991. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. APPROVAL.OF BILLS Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 505,302 Motor Fuel Tax Fund - Community Development Block Grant Fund 1,255 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 11,819 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 68,139 Parking System Revenue Fund 1,394 Risk Management Fund 88,889 Motor Equipment Pool Fund 1,771 Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 7,656 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 230,000 Debt Service Funds - Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund. 2,855 Police Pension Fund: 44,265 Firemen's Pension Fund 42,263 Benefit Trust Fund $1,005,608 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. D COMNUN , IONS AND PETITIONS C %ZENS: TO� BE RE, FIRE/POLICE Bernie stein, Co-Chairman: OLD BUSINESS An Ordinance was presented for second reading that LOW INTEREST would authorize an Agreement to allocate certain MORTGAGE industrial revenue bond money to be used for low FUNDS interest mortgage money -for first time home buyers within the Village. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ORD.NO. 4276 for passage of Ordinance No. 4276 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT AND REALLOCATION OF PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND VOLUME CAP IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF CERTAIN SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS AND RELATED MATTERS Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Weibel, Floros Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that AMEND would amend Ordinance No. 4148 by extending the ORD.NO. 4148 effective date for one additional year. LAKE CENTER PLAZA It was noted that variations granted to property commonly known as Lake Center Plaza will expire March 7, 1991 due to the fact that no building permit has been granted for the subject property. The developer is in the process of applying for a building permit but plan reviews will not be completed prior to the expiration date. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Weibel, Floros Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO. 4277 for passage of Ordinance No. 4277 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4148 BY EXTENDING THE EFFECTIVE DATE FOR VARIATIONS GRANTED TO LAKE CENTER PLAZA' Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Weibel, Floros Nays: None Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS An Ordinance was presented for first reading that TIF: would authorize the acquisition of property to be ACQUIRE included in the Tax Increment Financing District PROPERTY - (TIF). The property to be acquired is the Prospect PROSPECT Theatre, 18 South Main Street. THEATRE 18 S.MAIN ST. Page"3 - March 5, 1991 l r o •para uaT-aye r " J auoH rsALH soaaTa ";'Tai[; 'MOI ueA i.; 'ueaooao r,, I,°n'a :SOA :TTeo ; uodn 00018, LKaKd0rIaAaG ALI 01, 66T Hill a in HHS; 0XIAOuddy xc limmn J! % T6 T •oN uoT4nToseu bes red ao; Aanz ' Tagta n A papuooas ' uearool a' ,sna,j T6-01 • ON' SaU • TeAaa% de ' 440xii6oaa pue ps'eaoTT'e n,T pue 0'0 oar aq-4 ` O a ' , d s uoTssTmmxo ueTa "T66T xea T sT ani. p X06TS-.uOmdaTaAaa Un=00 , a t aadde Tna P� `, a-4uasead seri aT asa2t V sa�IfL3 �Sa f �ff J f •para uoT40K p suoH sAeH soaoTa u To 'M �!a0 ueA j , ' ueaoo foo nS !Antl42V : s9AV TTea a uodn Ss I' vu, SsvHDaad of isaw NY a4 90 s "inionLav wg' T l 1 fl Zt, 'OX aoueuTpaO bessed .lo ' Tr ao ' anx a odd° a pepuaoss ' ue:oma .s a 6 L Z � ' OH ' azo j •POT a UOT40H ? 1 t euoH :s a j, ,1 11, saaaTa 'Ta 4o ueA l 'UeaO0.XO3 ° tn¢ :su :TTeCO oda uodn ~aa uTpa q ue 3o s„ res " , ars- aC buTaTnbeOT"" aAT2m o ps o r ' an i s tu'L"' ' C papuaaas ' ueaoo a snzs ' 000' 0FZ$ 4unome axq (aa e c 7; ds+ A) saa $' uTvX tib ST We ' Ss NITd1�I *s 81 s eoaT l%:ts ` rse nand elgq azYao a pTnoM Aluadoull q-4 buTplosa - ;T ►j paqusssad sem a 1 Tpao UV SsyHo2ina i" r' •paT uaY4ox sAeK j; ` 'Ta auaH 'V ueA soaoTa 'ueao04O '� nS a nu a� a sax s TTeo; fl a uodn d w' KaoriaAaaaa arta ia , ars a ��, i xvi aaaxa�m as 'SSIM2iSH O i , , , a rei HonoaHl A -40 NOI.Li n �� TZIUGHsnV aDXVKx r ; XV r 'Z'6 • all aoueuTpaO ` r1 ;abesed ;Eo,; p omp'ue�woaaAct papugaas 'ang i as snaL SLZt -'oh'a23o J 1 1° •paza UOT40K suoH :shell oaoTa, To, "4,09 ueA 'ueaao�s s0AV z TTeo , da uodn r •a figtTplo u ; JO j PVOI,t OA4 buTatrnbaa aTn 1 anTeM o-4 p aia ' uea 0a0 4srql Aq pspuOoes ' an' l as seas l t J 11 if �� a VILLAGE KANAGERIS REPORT Village Manager John Fulton Dixon gave a status report on the following items. The Mount Prospect Jaycees Club has announced that the annual Sandbox Day has been cancelled due to low membership in that Club and the lack of manpower. Mr. Dixon stated that the first sodium street light has been -installed and that no complaints, have been received. Wal-Mart should be breaking ground for their new store at the Mount Prospect Plaza property within the next week. ADJOURNMENT Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 8:41 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 5 - March 5, 1991 NAZI•8 ISM SODIUM STREET LIGHT INSTA= VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT February 1, 1991 - February 28, 1991 General and Special Revenue Eqnds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund Motor Equipment Pool Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement Repl or Repair Fund Corporate Purpose Construction 1991 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985 Debt Service Funds Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds Fund Revenues Expenses Fund Balance for for Balance Jan 31 1991 February 1991 February 1991 Feb 28 1991 $ 3,832,432 $1,518,574 $1,333,277 $ 4,017,729 496,193 80,049 25,352 550,890 17,107 10,500 5,426 22,181 <142,018> 44,148 54,827 < 152,697> 3,356,736 394,658 413,166 3,338,228 169,018 16,271 4,508 180,781 1,292,651 175,190 119,889 1,347,952 357,778 1,748 1,965 357,561 333,574 19,963 15,372 338,165 - - 230,000 < 230,000> 185,994 1,621 20,337 167,278 735,775 3,096 < 28,908> 767,779 15,586,956 125,480 44,264 15,668,172 17,547,309 135,818 42,263 17,640,864 258.828 1,263 2,167 257,924 $44,028,333 $2.528,379 $2,283,905 $44.272.807 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y-T-D Y-T-D CUR NO UNREC'D % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL GENERAL FUND TAX REVENUE 1-000-00-4001 TAXES-CORPORATE CURRENT 1,514,500 1,262,080 149,082 149,082 1,365,418- 1,365,418- 90- 1-000-00-4002 TAXES-CORPORATE PRIOR 1,723,300 1,436,080 1,684,944 38,356- 38,356- 2- 1-000-00-4OD4 TAXES-GARBAGE CURRENT 745,600 621,330 77,981 77,981 667,619- 667,619- 90- 1-000-00-4005 TAXES-GARBAGE PRIOR 926,600 772,160 906,000 20,600- 20.600- 2- 1-000-00-4010 TAXES-RD & BRDG CURRENT 12,OOD 10,000 1,019 1,019 10,981- 10,981- 92- 1-000-00-4011 TAXES-RD & BRDG PRIOR 12,000 10,000 10,086 1,914- 1,914- 16- 1-000-00-4013 RETAILERS OCCUPATION TAX5,925,000 4,937,500 4,819,590 533,831 1,105,410- 1,105,410- 19- 1-000-00-4014 SALES TAX-SPECIAL PAYMNT 126,815 126,815 126,815 0 1-000-00-4015 FOREIGN FIRE INS TAX 0 1-000-00-4016 AUTO RENTAL TAX 6,000 5,000 6,077 631 77 77 1 1-000-00-4017 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 525,000 437,500 331,498 18,024 193,502- 193,502- 37- 1-000-00-4018 FOOD & BEVERAGE TAX 550,000 458,330 452,788 44,999 97,212- 97,212- 18- 1-000-OD-4020 ELECTRONICS GAME TAX 19,00D 10 000 14 855 -_g2 735 2 855 1- 2.955 24 T77- TOTAL TAX REVENUE V 8, 81 , 3,371.265- FEE REVENUE 1-000-00-4101 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 275,000 229,160 191,521 16,316 83,479- 83,479- 30- 1-000-00-4102 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 45,000 37,500 36,361 2,238 8,639- 8,639- 19- 1-000-00-4104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 27,500 22,910 19,052 2,080 8,449- 8,448- 31- 1-000-00-4105 PLAN EXAMINATION FEES 50,000 41,660 34,353 2,263 15,647- 15,647- 31- 1-000-00-4106 STREET OPENING FEES 500 410 750 50 250 250 50 1-000-00-4107 VEHICLE LICENSE FEES 730,000 608,330 926,473 193,407 196,473 196,473 27 1-000-OD-4108 DOG LICENSES 12,000 10,000 14,682 4,000 2,682 2,682 22 1-000-00-4109 LIQUOR LICENSES 127,500 106,250 127,320 4,350 180- 180- 0 1-000-00-4110 BUSINESS LICENSES 160,000 133,330 170,867 10,991 10,867 10,867 7 1-000-00-4112 PUBLIC IMPR INSPECTIONS 65,000 54,160 58,525 6,475- 6,475- 10- 1-000-00-4113 RENTAL FEES 45,OOD 37,500 22,500 22,500- 22,500- 50- 1-000-00-4114 FEES-BOARD OF APPEALS 15,000 12,500 16,177 1,004 1,177 1,177 8 1-000-00-4115 CENTEL FRANCHISE FEES 31,000 25,830 24,615 6,385- 6,385- 21- 1-000-00-4116 BELL SYS FRANCHISE FEES 92,OOD 76,660 76,633 15,367- 15,367- 17- 1-000-00-4119 ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS 13,000 10,830 11,045 625 1,955- 1,955- 15- 1-000-00-4120 FALSE ALARM FEES 10,000 8,330 5,780 1,100 4,220- 4,220- 42- 1-000-00-4121 CABLE TV FRANCHISE FEES 155,000 129,160 143,504 15,125 11,496- 11,496- 7- 1-000-00-4123 LANDLORD/TENANT FEES 35 000 29 160 36 967 1 967 1.967 6 TOTAL FEE REVENUE , OD} INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1-000-00-4150 STATE INCOME TAX 1,775,000 1,479,160 1,642,374 201,765 132,626- 132,626- 7- 1-000-00-4151 STATE SALES TAX 125,000 104,160 84,485 9,830 40,515- 40,515- 32- 1-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX-SURCHG 1,500,ODD 1,250,000 1,162,801 142,850 337,199- 337,199- 22- 1-000-00-4153 STATE USE TAX 159,311 159,311 159,311 0 1-000-00-4154 GRANT-SR. CITIZEN TAXI 0 1-000-00-4156 EMPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS 20,000 16,660 21,994 1,272 1,994 1,994 10 1-ODO-00-4158 CHARITABLE GAMES TAX 2,185 2,185 2,185 0 1-000-00-4160 RECYCLING GRANT 2,500 2,080 2,500 0 1-000-00-4161 GRANT - POLICE M E G 10,000 8,330 8,020 1,980- 1,980- 20- 1-000-00-4162 GRANT-ILEC POLICE TRNG 20,000 16,660 25590 5,590 5,590 28 1-000-00-4163 GRANT-STATE FIRE TRAING 17,500 14,580 14,949 2,551- 2,551- 15- 1-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 137,500 114,580 36,590 100,910- 100,910- 73- 1-000-00-4165 PERSONAL PROP REPL R&B 3.500 2,910 2,058 1,442- _ 1.442- 41- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2128/91 1490-91 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR NO UNREC'D t BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL GENERAL FUNO TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 3,611,000 3,009,120 3,162,857 355,717 448,143- 448,143- 12 - SERVICE CIIARGE REVENUE 1-000-00-4175 W & S SERVICE CHARGE 200,000 166,660 180,000 20,000 20,000- 20,000- 10- 1-000-00-4177 MAINT. OF STATE HIGHWAYS 50,000 41,660 25,036 24,964- 5,066- 24,964- 5,066- 50- 35- 1-000-00-4178 1-000-00-4180 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPD AMBULANCE TRNSPRT FEE 14,500 12,080 45,000 37 500 9,434 43,334 3 597 1 666- b97k- 1 666- WW- 4- 17 TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 304,500 257� 257,804 ,5 _ S - PARKING REVENUE 1-000-00-4216 FINES - LOCAL 135,000 112,500 101,844 8,898 33,106- 33,106- 25- 1-000-00-4217 FINES - CIRCUIT COURT 145,000 120,830 119,021 25 25,979- 25,974- 75- 18- 15 1-000_00-4218 FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES 500 41 ____ 425 - 221,340 75- 54,160- - 21- 92- TOTAL PARKING REVENUE _3 ,740 O �i RE{iEN1 0000 0000000 00000000 , o 0 h'1i?O Yi39=3i16E�?F�CWE'BGQtFS.. o ti 00000............. ....... o 0 0 0.0 1,50ti x.41 250 : - 6!�4.e 55,214- 55; COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 23-000-00-4155 COSS GRANT 539,725 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 514,000 PAGE 3 25,725- 5- ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 41 660� 4 n4,000 103M 50 l25` ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 100- 79 - TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 52 500 43 750 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT -----`------------------------------------ X ------------------------------------------ BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 1,340 1,340- 1,340- 10- 24-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 3.100 1,51 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 22-000-00-4157 M F T ALLOCATION 1,150,000 958,330 912,067 77,677 237,933- 237,933- 21- 22-000-00-4242 REINBURSEMT ON PROJECTS 41,000 34,160 25,982 15,018- 15,018- 37- 22-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FUND 44,148 297,924- 297,924- 43- BENEFIT TRUST #2 0 22-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 19,000 15,830 34,169 2,347 15,169 15,169 80 22-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 1,248 1,248 3 823- 259 9 25 8-0. 40 259 � T,$ - 259 2T7,523- 0 T20 - TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1,2 00 - ,4 TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST A2 20,000 16,660 TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 1,210,000 1,OD8,320 972,477 80,049 237,523- 237,523- 20 - COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 23-000-00-4155 COSS GRANT 539,725 449,770 514,000 10,500 25,725- 25,725- 5- 23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME 50 000 584,725 41 660� 4 n4,000 103M 50 l25` 6,998- 100- 79 - TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 52 500 43 750 41 044 ` 37� 921 12 25 42. 11 456- 11 456- 22- TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT -----`------------------------------------ 589,725 491,430 514,000 10,500 75,725- 75,725- 13 - ILL. MUNICIPAL... RETIREMENT FUND TAX REVENUE 24-000-00-4055 TAXES - CURRENT 307,600 256,330 30,275 30,275 277,325- 277,325- 90- 24-000-00-4056 TAXES - PRIOR 313,600 261,330 306,602 6,998- 6,998- 2- 24-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 52 500 43 750 41 044 ` 37� 921 12 25 42. 11 456- 11 456- 22- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 6 . INTERFUND TRANSFERS 24-000-00-4228 TRANS - GENERAL/CABLE TV 13,400 11,160 12,060 1,340 1,340- 1,340- 10- 24-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 3.100 1,51 2 295 8 1,348 805- 2,145- 805- 2,145- 26- 13 - TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 16,500 13,740 4,355 TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND ------------------------------------------ 690,200 575,150 392,276 44,148 297,924- 297,924- 43- BENEFIT TRUST #2 OTHER REVENUE 31-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 20 OQD 16 660 16 177 1,248 1,248 3 823- 3 823- - 19 - 9 - TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 0, , 1 ,1 7 - TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST A2 20,000 16,660 16,177 1,248 3,823- 3,823- 19- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BENEFIT TRUST #3 OTHER REVENUE 32-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL BENEFIT TRUST #3 LIBRARY fUND TAX REVENUE 39-OOD-OD-4031 TAXES - LIBRARY SERVICES1,618,700 1,348,910 39 -000 -IID -4037 TAXES - IMRF 218,40D 182,000 3940004X2-4038 TAXES - MAINT & REPAIR 140,700 117,250 184 15 184 15 UNREC'D BALANCE 184 - 84 184 1,618,700- 218,400- 140,700- 29,12{I - PAGE 4 X BALANCE SAL 184 0 8F 0 184 0 1,618,700- 100- 218,400- 100- 140,700- 100 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 39-000-00-4157 STATE GRANT ° 52,280 43,560 52,280- 52,280- 100- 39-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 26 bI1Q 60- 6., -_ DO- IDD- TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE ,880 14,385- 2- 31 2 PARKING REVENUE 39-000-00-4216 FINES AND FORFEITS 40,000 33,330 40,000- 40.004- 40,ODD- 100- 100- 39-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 40,000 33,330 40,000- 381 120- 381 120- 100 - 39 -000 -OD -4254 OTHER INCOME 381.120 317 600 2,888,674 _ - 645,326- TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 461,120_ 335,000 279,160 271,996 TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 2,546,920 2,122,400 2,546,920- 2,546,920- - 1OD------------------------------------------ WATER & SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 41 -000 -OD -4019 TAXES - CURRENT 41 DOO 00 4020 TAXES PRIOR 41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 41-000-00-4157 GRANT -SEWER REHAB 41-000-00-4201 WATER SALES 41-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES 41-000-00-4204 METER SALES 41-ODO-00-4205 WATER & SEWER TAPS 41-ODO-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 41 -000 -OD -4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 41-000-00-4246 JAWA INCOME 41-000-00-4247 JAWA INTEREST 41-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 764,800 637,330 73,171 73,171 691,629- 691,629- 90- 887,000 739,160 872,615 14,385- 14,385- 2- 31 2 16 3 7 44- 392,40D 327,000 372,794 19,606- 19,606- 5- 3,534,000 2,945,000 2,888,674 254,556 645,326- 645,326- 18- 335,000 279,160 271,996 24512 63,004- 63,004- . 19- 60,000 50,000 43,074 3,686 16,926- 16,926- 28- 20,000 16,660 17,520 2,043 2,480- 2,480- 12- 75,000 62,500 71,159 16,250 3,841- 3,841- 5- 25,000 10,000 20,830 8,330 25,431 11,442 879 374 431 1,442 431 1,442 2 14 0 50,000 41,660 9,653 40,347- 40,347- 81- 270,000 225,000 228,431 16,479 41,569- 41,569- 15- PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND FEE REVENUE 46-000-00-4113 RENTAL - DEPOT 2 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2 640 2 640 PAGE 5 240- 240- 8- S- ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 48 -000 -OD -4176 INSPECTION SERVICES CHGS 12,000 10,000 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 PARKING REVENUE 46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION UNIT #1 82,000 68,330 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D 23- % #2 66,000 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL WATER & SEWER FUND 7,500 6,576 480 2,424- 2,424- 27- INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 130,000 8,962 2,070 8,962 8,962 41-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS 30,ODO 25,000 6,842 1,681 23,158- 23,158- 77- 41-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 5,000 4,160 6,893 1,027 1,893 1,893 38 41-000-00-4280 SALE OF PROPERTY 5,000 4,160 6,550 TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND ----------------------`------------------- 1,550 1,550 31 41-000-00-4289 GAIN/LOSS SALE OF ASSETS 25,108- 25,108- 14 - 0 0 41-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 8,500 7,080 8,500 0 41-000-00-4299 WATER CLEARING ACCOUNT 48-000-00-4248 1 5,000 1 1 0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,811,4-I�0 4,{%9,460 3,960,460 321,487 $50,94f}- 850,940- 18 - TOTAL WATER & SEWER FUND 6,493,200 5,410,950 4,923,149 394,658 1,570,051- 1,570,051- 24 - PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND FEE REVENUE 46-000-00-4113 RENTAL - DEPOT 2 400 2 640 2 640 484 480 240- 240- 240- 240- 8- S- TOTAL FEE REVENUE 48 -000 -OD -4176 INSPECTION SERVICES CHGS 12,000 10,000 12,000 PARKING REVENUE 46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION UNIT #1 82,000 68,330 63,004 6,732 18,996- 18,996- 23- 46-000-00-4212 METER COLLECTION UNIT #2 66,000 55,000 56,456 5,677 9,544- 9,544- 14- 46-ODO-00-4213 SPACE RENT WILLE ST.LOT 9,000 7,500 6,576 480 2,424- 2,424- 27- 46-000-00-4214 PROSPECT AVE. 130,000 8,962 2,070 8,962 8,962 0 46-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 15.000 12 500 12 134 832 2.866- 2.866- 19- TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 172,{X)0 143,330 147=132 15,791 24,868- 24,868- 14 - TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND ----------------------`------------------- 174,880 145,730 149,772 16,271 25,108- 25,108- 14 - MOTOR EQUIPMENT... POOL FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 48 -000 -OD -4176 INSPECTION SERVICES CHGS 12,000 10,000 12,000 0 48-000-00-4177 HUMAN SERVICES CHARGES 1,500 1,250 1,500 0 48-000-00-4178 PLANNING & ZONING CHGS 1,500 1,250 1,500 0 48-000-00-4179 POLICE DEPT CHARGES 130,000 108,330 130,000 0 48-000-00-4180 FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES 135,000 112,500 135,OOD 0 48-000-00-4181 STREET DIVISION CHARGES 190,000 158,330 190,400 0 48-000-00-4182 WATER FUND CHARGES 87,500 72,910 87,500 0 48-000-00-4183 PARKING FUND CHARGES 8,500 7,080 8,500 0 48-000-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 5,000 4,160 18,661 1,748 13,661 13,661 273 48-000-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,500 2,080 5,200 2,700 2,700 108 48 -ODD -00-4263 SALE OF P.W. EQUIPMENT 10,000 8,330 9,800 200- 200- 2- 48-000-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT 10.000 8.330 10.000- 10,000- 100 - TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 593,500 494,550 599,661 1,748 6,161 6,161 1 TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND ------------------------------------------ 593,500 494,550 599,661 1,748 6,161 6,161 1 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND PAGE 6 UNREC'D % BALANCE BALANCE SAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4176 GENERAL FUND CHARGES 1,295,100 1,079,250 1,159,50D 120,600 135,600- 135,600- 10- 49-000-00-4177 NATER FUND CHARGES 207,300 172,750 187,350 19,950 19,950- 19,950- 400- 10- 10- 49 -OW -00-4178 PARKING FUND CHARGES 4,000 3,330 3,600 400 400- 61,000- 61,000- 1OD- 49-000-00-4179 49-000-00-4241 LIBRARY FIRS? CHARGES EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 61,000 67,000 50,830 55,830 64,027 7,231 2,973- 2,973- 4- 49 -ODD -00-4242 RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS 126,500 105,410 109,330 11,331 17,170- 17,170- 49,581 14- 163 49-ODO-W-4243 LIBRARY CONTRIBUTIONS 30,500 25,410 80,081 7,104 49,581 388 388 6 49-000-00-4244 FLEXCOMP CONTRIBUTIONS 6,000 25,000 5,000 20,830 6,388 15,531 569 1,00D 9,469- 9,469- 38- 49-000-00-4245 49 -ODD -00-4248 REIMBURSEMENTS INVESTMENT INCOME 80,000 66,660 68+226 6,838 11,774- 11,774- 15- 49-000-00-4249 49-000-00-4250 INTEREST - GIE BANK INTEREST INCOME 5,500 4,580 167 5,500- 5,500- 52,00 100- TOTAL SERVICE E REVENUE i, 8 # 1,695+36 1719}, 2 - .F,... . .- ...� ... ... moo... ..,...�. ,.. ------------------------------------ -„ �t:....�� ............�....... .. .�,....: .�.. _.. ....... ._..._ ........._._.....,.� ....- ...... ....-.. �e� _ .-.. .. .....-.-.... ... ...._ _ ... CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND TAX REVENUE 51-000-00-4016 TAXES - CURRENT 186,400 155,330 18,348 18,348 168,052- 168,052- 5,026- 90- 2- 51-000-00-4017 TAXES - PRIOR 226,000 45,000 188,330 37,500 220,974 29,246 1,615 5,026- 15,754- 15,754- 35- 514000--„4248 INTEREST INCOME 51--00-4267 DEVELOPER DONATION 120,000 100,000 5,400 114,600- 114,600- 96- 51 -ODD -00-4268 HISTORICAL SOCIETY DONTM-0- - TOTAL TAX REVENUE $ 3,4 - TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND 607,400 506,160 273,968 19,963 333,432- 333,432- 55 - ICER FIRE BUILDING CfRtST LVIMM nerenvc 53-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 4 000 OOD 3.333,330 4,000,000- 4 O00 O00 100 2 , INTEREST INCOME TOTAL POLICE i FIRE BUILDING CONST 4,025,000 3,354,160 4,025,000- 4,025.000- 100' NTOWN RED€VLPNT CONST 1985 FEE REVENUE 55-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 13,500 11,250 11,250 750 2,250- 2,250- 17- 55-0DO-OO-4248 INTEREST INCOME 7,500 6,250 9,286 846 1,786 1,786 24 55-TOTALFEEOSREVENUE INTEREST INCOME 21+--Tl-,5(R5-�- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 r -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D i BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 21,000 17,500 20,755 1,621 245- 245- 1 ------------------------------------------ - DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 OTHER REVENUE 56-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 1,000,000 - 833,330 1,000,000- 1.000.000- 100- 56-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 5, ODD 4 160 5,000- 5,000- 100- TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 1,005,000 837,490 1,005,000- 1,005,000- 100 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1991 1,005,000 837,490 1,005,000- 1,005,000- 100 - CORPORATE PURPOSES -WA I 1973 TAX REVENUE 60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 74,700 62,250 7,351 7,351 67,349- 67,349- 90- 60-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 91,400 76,160 89,349 273- 2,051- 2,051- 2- 60-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 5,300 4,410 5,300 5,300- - -1-IM- 0 -OTOOOTALOTAX4REVENUEINTEREST INCOME gr 15- 8 � 14 &7T _� --- + _ 71 ;r3- 39 - PURPOSES B & 1 1974 269,450 1$0+550 154,930 5,003 114,520- 114,520- 43 - TOTAL CORPORATE ------------------------------------------ PURPOSES B & E 1973 181,950 151,610 111,477 2,450 70,473- 70,473- -39- CORPORATE PURPOSES 89 11974 TAX REVENUE 61-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 118,500 98,750 11,662 11,662 106,838- 106,838- 90- 61-000-00-4023 TAXES - PRIOR 122,550 102,120 119,859 273- 2,691- 2,691- 2- 61 -000 -OD -4164 61-OOAL�TAX4REVENUE'INTEREST PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX INCOME 8,400 7,000 1 8,400 54; 7,225- - -1-IM- 0 43 269�450 gr _ 26,500 - TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 1 1974 269,450 224,530 154,930 5,003 114,520- 114,520- 43 - SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS --B & I TAX REVENUE 62-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 11,700 9,750 1,070 1,070 10,630- 10,630- 91- 62-000-00-4026 TAXES - PRIOR 11,80D 9,830 11,527 273- 273- 2- 62-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 3 -ODD 2 500 794 1 9 178 206- 11,10- 206- ll,lrF9- 7- 42 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE , TOTAL SSA #1 PROSPECT MEADOWS B 6 I 26,500 22,080 15,391 1,248 11,109- 11,109- 42- TOTAL POLICE i FIRE BUILDING 8 i I 325,000 270,820 325,OOD- 325,000- tOO- DOUNTONN REDEVI,PMT B i I 1991 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 65-000-00-4228 TRANS - D/T COAST 1990 48 500 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT - 4 - - �� 100- 100 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 40,.410 - 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'O 48,500 % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL SSA #2 BLACXHAiNC B i I TAX REVENUE TAX REVENUE 63-000-00-4028 TAXES - CURRENT 15,000 12,50D 2,081 2,081 12,919- 12,919- 86- 63-000-00-4029 "TAXES - PRIOR 14,500 12,080 14,341 159- 159- 1- 63-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 200 2 9 183_ 230- 230- 13,308- 7 41 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 126- 1 483 32, 00 ,24 1 ,392 2, 13,308- TOTAL SSA #2 BLACKHAYK ------------------------------------------ B i I 32,700 27,240 19,392 2,264 13,308- 13,308- 41- POLICE i FIRE BUILDING B i I INTERFUND TRANSFERS A4 -ODD -DD -4227 TRANS - FLOOD CONTROL 305,000 254,160 5,0 3000- 305,000- 100- TOTAL POLICE i FIRE BUILDING 8 i I 325,000 270,820 325,OOD- 325,000- tOO- DOUNTONN REDEVI,PMT B i I 1991 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 65-000-00-4228 TRANS - D/T COAST 1990 48 500 40 410 - 4 - - �� 100- 100 - TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 40,.410 - TOTAL DOVNTONN REDEVLPMT 8 i I 1991 ------------------------------------------ 48,500 40,410 48,500- 48,500- 100- INSURANCE RESERVE B i I TAX REVENUE 0 66-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 66-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 59,900 49,910 58,543 1,357- 1,357- 2- 66-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 7 600 ---r1,483- 6 6,330 56,Z40 7 474 66,017 669 669 126- 1,483- 126- 1 483 - ___?- 2 T E YOTAa INSURANCJE R S V B"X I -- ------------------------------------------ TAX REVENUE- TAX 68-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 90,000 75,000 223,848 28,999- 133,848 133,848 149 68-000-00-4039 SALES TAX INCREMENT0 TOTAL TAX REVENUE -W00� ---75-CM -T2-3g4-8 - 13 133,848 149 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 68-000-00-4224 TRANS - D/T CONST 1985 24,OOD 20,000 24,OOD- 24,000- 100- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PAGE 9 UNREC'D X BALANCE BALANCE BAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 & 11987D TAXES - CURRENT 100,000 83,330 2,294 2,294 97,706- 97,706- 98- INTERFUND TRANSFERS 68-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME _72 375 310 __M_,Ti_0 5 587 503 5 21 5 12 390 �7- TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS POLICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS 240,000 200,000 206,055 18,742 33,945- 1 - 71-000-00-4248 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 19870 ------------------------------------------ 114,375 95,310 229,435 28,496- 115,060 115,060 101 P W FACILITY B & 119878 7,578 817 2,578 2,578 0 52 71-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF TAX REVENUE 69-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 175,900 146,580 17,316 17,316 158,584- 158,584- 90- 69-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 178,750 148,950 174,773 15 - 3,977- 3,977- 2- 69 -000 -OD -4248 INTEREST INCOME 17 500 14,580 549 951 15, W 3 049 159:512- __i3 049 WW- 17 3- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 3i� 0, TOTAL P W FACILITY B & I 19878 372,150 310,110 212,638 18,267 159,512- 159,512- 43 - DOWNTOWN REDfV_LPMT B & 11987C INTERFUHD TRANSFERS 70-000-00-4224 TRANS - D/T CONST 1987 29,500 24,580 29,50D- 29,500- 100- 70-000-00-4225 TRANS - D/T CONST 1485 0 70-000-00-4226 TRANS - D/T REDEVL 19870 29,178 270 29,178 29,178 0 70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 0 TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS$ TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987C 29,500 24,580 29,178 270 322- 322- 1 ------------------------------------------ - POLICE PENSION_.... FUND TAX REVENUE 71-000-00-4049 TAXES - CURRENT 100,000 83,330 2,294 2,294 97,706- 97,706- 98- 71 -DOD -00-4050 TAXES - PRIOR 2,000 1,660 55,245 53,245 53,245 662 71-000-00-4243 POLICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS 240,000 200,000 206,055 18,742 33,945- 33,945- 14- 71-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,305,000 1,087,500 1,093,901 103,627 211,099- 211,099- 16- 71 -000 -OD -4249 71-000-00-4250 OTHER BANK INTEREST INCOME 5,000 4,160 7,578 817 2,578 2,578 0 52 71-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INYESTMT 38.516 �51b 0 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1,652,000 1,3 76,65(# 1,403,584 125,480 248,41 - 2 8, fi - 15 - TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND 1,652,000 11376,650 1,403,589 125,480 248,411- 248,411- 15 - FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE SSA N6 6EQRGEIALBERT B & I TAX REVENUE 94-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1,357 PAGE 10 14,843- ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 94-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 16,000 13,330 16,494 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 494 519 3 94-TOTALOTAX4REVENUEINTEREST INCOME 7,4 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNREC'D % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL 72-000-00-4052 TAXES - CURRENT 50,000 41,660 33,OD0 27,490 50,000- 26,621 50,x- 26,621 100- 662 72 -000 -OD -4053 TAXES -PRIOR 72-000-00-4243 FIREMEN'S CONTRIBUTIONS 1,000 830 27,621 232,000 193,330 197,786 17,634 34,214- 34,214- 15- 72-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,465,000 1,220,830 1,235,454 117,401 229,546- 229,546- 16- 72-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME 72-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 35 5,000 4,160 7,936 783 35 2,936 35 2,936 0 59 72-000-00-4240 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTNT 48 350 N $ 48 350 - 3 23 - 0 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE , _ TOTAL FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND ------------------------------------------ 1,753,000 1,460,810 1,517,182 135,818 235,818- 235,818- 13- SSA N4 BUSSE-NILLE B & I INS T I - - - - - - TOTAL SSA #4 BUSSE-MILLE B i I ------_----------------------------------- 63 5 63 63 0 SSA N6 6EQRGEIALBERT B & I TAX REVENUE 94-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 16,200 13,500 1,357 1,357 14,843- 14,843- 92- 94-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 16,000 13,330 16,494 494 519 494 519 3 94-TOTALOTAX4REVENUEINTEREST INCOME 7,4 1 319 9 1,4660 - 4 16 - 2- TOTAL SSA #6 GEORGE/ALBERT B 6 I ------------------------------------------ 33,OD0 27,490 19,170 1,416 13,830- 13,830- 42- TOTAL ALL FUNDS 34,584,850 28,569,808 37,153,454 2,528,379 16,015,045- 16,015,042- 46- - - VILLAGE OF NOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION 2,375 14 1,736 71 1,665 MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1 757- 2,354 -- 1 757- 2:283 44- 2,071 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 17,500 14,580 15,125 1,542 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 39,000 32,490 37,264 119 TOTAL COMMODITIES --COOO 39,875 3.330 5 75 378 TOTAL MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 10 7- 7- 0 ADVISORY BOARDS AMD COMMISSIONS 0 41,622 41,622 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERYfCES 2,500 2,080 429 TOTAL COMMODITIES 250 200 271 TOTAL ADVISORY BOARDS AND CDMMISSI 2,755 � --- IOb TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 63,250 52,680 58,846 2,039 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION AN SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 168,430 140,330 128,555 12,752 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,250 15,190 16,496 1,545 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,800 1,500 1,807 382 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,000 � -m 1.000 1,000 TOTAL AfMIINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 189,480 157,850 147,858 15,679 LEGAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16.5 ODD 137 490 ', 150.14 150 40 20 205 �2 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES 1 9 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT & TRAINING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 47,020 39,180 32,885 3,388 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,300 27,710 27,022 3,907 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT & TRAIN--Wf.-M 950 780 7b 1 426 61' ---T,-M SALARY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL SALARY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ------------------------------------------ 435,750 363,010 359,331 43,179 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION CABLE TV OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 83,420 69,500 64,964 5,977 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,810 23,150 26,945 1,735 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11,440 9,530 6,490 758 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9,500 7,910 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 13 400 1. 060 1 340 TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 145,570 121,250 110,459 9,810 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT PAGE 11 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE HAL 2,375 2,375 14 1,736 71 1,665 4 1 757- 2,354 -- 1 757- 2:283 44- 2,071 2,071 83 21- 21- 8- 2 2 5� 100 4,404 71 4,333 7 39,875 39,875 24 1,754 1,754 10 7- 7- 0 0 41,622 41,622 22 14 860 14 4 14,135 14,135 30 6,278 5 6,273 19 476- 476- 50 - lo -, 37 -79-, Sg -9 35,111 1 35,110 24 0 76,419 5 76,414 18 18,456 18,456 22 865 1 864 3 4,950 4,950 43 9,500 9,500 100 1 340 1 340 10 25`.iil 3511 2b 35,111 1 35,110 24 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/26/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 93,060 77,520 76,778 7,266 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 72,920 60,750 62,918 7,334 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 68,200 56,800 51,445 7,020 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,500 5,410 3,979 642 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 23.610 1.660 19,684 1,818 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 149,620 124,620 118,342 14,996 TING TOTAL PE L SERVICES 80,725 67,250 73,224 4,271 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,550 2,950 4,692 238 TOTAL COMMODITIES 7SQ 620 152 fu,am 78,071 9,509 TOTAL ACCOUNTING PURCHASING = TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 21.8W 18,160 18,259 1,692 r�tcve T ...,. DATA PROCESSING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 73,050 60,850 56,625 7,927 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,400 16,160 20,308 258 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,000 5,000 4,044 2,379 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4 500 102:95 3 750 4 331 X5-6 TOTAL DATA PROCESSING r5.7 OUPGATING SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,OOD 20,830 21,231 1,954 TOTAL COMMODITIES 7,50D 6 2.50 6,924 28,155 1.115 3.06 TOTAL DUPLICATING SERVICES 32,50 27, TELEPHONE SERVICE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 20,625 17,180 17,617 2,046 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 47,50D 39,580 26,811 3,308 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - 1�'� -1,250 ---F-33Z TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE 64,625 58,01044,4.E CUSTOMER SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 93,060 77,520 76,778 7,266 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,500 27,080 20,322 4,694 TOTAL COMMODITIES --sOOQ --1,-m--T 6 650 6 423 110 j.523 309 12,2 TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICES 7,496 ,2 1,142- 1,142- CASH MANAGEMENT TOTAL PERSONALSERVICES 23.610 19,660 19,684 1,818 TOTAL CASH MANAGEMENT 23,610 19,660 19,684 1,818 PAGE 12 UNEXPENDED UNENCUI I BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 10.002 10,002 14 16,755 18 16,737 25 2,521 2,521 39 2.000 2.000 10� 31,278 18 31,260 21 7,496 7,496 9 1,142- 1,142- 32- 598 598 80 6,952 6,952 8 3,541 3,541 16 600 60D 100 16,425 16,425 22 907- 908- 5- 1,956 1,956 33 169 169 4 X42 1 3,769 3,769 15 576 76 8 354,345 13 3,0D8 3,008 15 20,689 2D,689 44 1500 1 500 ''110 197 4,517 4,517 .15 16.282 16,282 17 12,178 22 12,156 37 1,07 1x57 1 3 926 3.926 17 -9z6 3,926 17 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y-T-D Y-T-D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT NDN-DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES 500 410 500 500 100 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500 500 140 TOTAL NON-DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE 500 410 TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------ 1,116,825 930,440 939,976 108,098 176,850 40 176,809 16 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE AD MINISTRATIOt ACU} SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 61,445 51,180 51,628 5,462 9,817 9,817 16 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,850 27,350 25,458 1,636 7,392 7,392 23 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5+ I $2,=,I.F - TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT VILL-AGE NEYSLETTER TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 45,500 37,910 32,075 6,797 13,425 13,425 30 TOTAL COMMODITIES �,- 50_0 39, 3.485 35,551} 702 9$5- 12,440 485- 12,440 39- 2b TOTAL VILLAGE NEUSLETTER 4 TOTAL VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE -----'------------------------------------ 147,295 122,680 117,947 15,492 29,348 29,348 20 RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1 443 299 119 889 472 702 472 32 3f' 472.466 669 25 -23 1 916 ODD 1P TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM ,91 96, 1,441$9 -• TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT ----------------------------------------- 1,916,000 1,596,630 1,443,299 119,889 472,702 32 472,669 25 INSPECTION SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES TOTAL PERSONkL SERVICES 361,390 301,110 303,598 28,854 57,792 57,792 16 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79,150 65,900 60,306 4,260 18,844 b 18,838 3,747 24 45 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8,300 6,890 4,553 927 3,747 Soo 500 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5 41071 7 1 -� TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES ENGINEERI4 SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 293,600 244,630 246,554 22,576 47,046 47,046 16 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74,150 61,740 69,026 5,097 5,125 4,415 4 5,120 4,415 7 68 TOTAL coMMITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 6,500 5,410 4 0003 3 2,085 152 3 848 4 3 848 4 96 7a TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICESTB'E$ 3 5, O �, 4 4 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES ------------------------------------------ 827,590 689,420 686,274 61,714 141,317 10 141,306 17 POLICE DEPARTMENT - ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT " TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 470,755 392,230 385,892 63,006 84,863 84,863 18 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 151,950 126,590 113,643 10,314 38,307 38,307 5,428 25 53 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10,250 8,540 4,822 178 5,428 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.000 3.330 ___- 2.I 1 402 1,402 1 35 20 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 636,.455 530,690 506".955 73,498 16,, .000 PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,565,355 2,137,740 2,131,321 192,311 434,034 434,034 17 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 294,390 245,310 272,419 29,250 24,350 15,230 20,096 1,277 21,971 14,020 21,971 14,020 7 48 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 00D 4 160 3 2,4 1 100 1 00 1, 22 16 TOTAL PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEME27 , .,422,87 '4W CRIME PREY PUBLIC AND YOUTN SERV TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 115,290 96,050 102,841 8,313 12,444 12,449 11 38 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 15,100 12,570 9,322 600 2 1 3 1,165 357 5,778 1 7 5,778 1 407 �3,9� :TOTAi,.aCRIMC,i'NEV�::�PUBLIC, AND �YOUt..�... T „�„�,. , TOTAL PERSONAL SERV -CES 533,555 444,570 460,165 41,531 73,390 73,340 7,446 14 16 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 45,800 38,160 38,354 2 000 3,926 191 �.'� 7,446 77 81, 772 -,�8 39 14 70TAL INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE P,355 4 .,390 4 -. CROSSING GUARDS TOTAL PERSONAL. SERVICES 48,000 40,000 34,718 4,142 13,282 13,282 205 28 TOTAL COMMODITIES 500 410205 4$, 40,410 5,01 4,142 13,487 93�$ _J1TOTAL 28 CROSSING GUARDS £AUIPLENT MAIN tNANtE S OPERATIONS TOTAL P£R SERVICES 52,870 44,040 37,61:8 3,912 15,262 15,262 29 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,550 166,270 182,987 6,644 16,563 3 2 16,560 11,693 8 9 TOTAL COMMODITIES 124,000 103,320 112,305 TOTAL CAPITAL 131 141 �10 8 11,009 2*7 11,695 2{ 5 2£385 is 72- TOTA EQUIPMENTENDITURMAINTEENANCE & OPER TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------ 4,684,415 3,903,270 3,922,656 371,170 761,759 5 761,754 16 FIRE i FNER6_kMG,Y;,PROTECTIpN DEPT. ...�..... m. TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 50,950 42,420 33,115 2,176 1T,835 4,741 11 53 17,824 4,68& 35 14 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 32,800 27,330 28,054 15 29I2 i2=740 8 376 13,217 75 b.$i4 3 __ �.__.Fi'1 45 TOTAL ADRINISTRATION AND SUPPORT - ,ObS 319.130 ,241 61,,415 77,824 b7 7 77 20 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,765,135 2,304,220 2,373,625 210,609 391,510 391,510 14 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 252,540 210,430 226,068 21,496 26,472 8 26,464 979 10 8 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 11,760 9,780 10,781 84,370 70.270 43 705 1,835 2.5 979 40 665 82 40 583 48 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 2,594,700 2, 236,509 45 ,62 90 36 15 5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUI % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL FIRE : EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 1 FIRE PREVENTION 229,405 191,120 194,077 17,187 35,328 1 35,32$ 12,077 15 31 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL S€RVICES 39,400 32,810 27,322 1,820 12,079 725 725 13 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5,715 2 115 4,730 1,750 4,990 1.624 491 491 23 TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION: 276--j33 230,410 228,013 0,01 48,623 1 48,621 18 COMMUNICATIONS 36,000 29,490 31,374 2,432 4,626 2 4,624 13 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES9 5 8 180 6 176 �860 3t 9 -- 5 - 8,272 -$ TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS EOXIIPM275 ENT MAINTENANCE : OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 62,240 51,860 52,280 4,713 9,961 4,960 16 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 157,230 46,000 131,020 38,320 151,377 33,051 635 2,876 5,854 12,949 2 5,851 12,949 4 28 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES _ 72 6 6 943 243 � 158 8,382 327 29.091 2 29,087 4 11 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE t OPER 272,740 227,250 EMERGENCY PR€PAREONESS 3,000 2,500 2,538 231 462 462 645 15 i9 TOTAL P€RSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,560 2,950 2,890 343 670 25 84 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 910 7 505 750 6 240 826 6._3 982 --FiO 2 - 27 980 X,171 13 -9 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 141975 , TOTAL FIRE a EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. -------------------------`--------_`------ 4,107,045 3,422,100 3,481,411 328,179 625,637 190 625,444 15 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE FOLIC€ i FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES 339 283 311 289 28.299 28.311 28,311 28.311 28,311 8 8 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL POLICE i FIRE DISPATCH SERVI39 Za3,OUG 319,9 28,299 TOTAL CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ------------------------------------------ 339,600 283,000 311,289 28,299 28,311 28,311 8 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION INFORMATION. REFERRAL. $ COUNSELING 97.480 81,E 83.509 7.860 13.471 13,971 14 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,570 27,120 27,857 3,479 4,713 336 4,713 336 14 7 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4,550 1 500 3,780 1 250 4,214 2,114 281 536 614- -- 2 616- 41 - -U TOTAL INFORMATION, REFERRAL, i COU 1 , ' 12.156 4 ,4 RECREATION AND EDUCATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 14,720 12,250 12,502 1,138 2,218 2,218 15 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2.315 1.920 2 1 25 x,24# 25 1 -B TOTAL RECREATION AND EDUCATION ,03 ,1 , HOMESOUND SERVICES 50,725 42,250 43,383 3,456 7,342 7,342 14 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,150 12,620 12,196 784 2,954 2.954 19 5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PAGE 16 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION TOTAL HOMEBOUND SERVICES 65,8 �S,3T� - 16 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 38,355 31,940 31,175 1,676 7,180 7,180 19 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES 1 650 1 360 33,10 1 301 116 - 1-g92 349 X24 349 7,529 21 19 BL0�3 PROGRAM TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,805 2,330 2,336 234 469 469 17 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1.450 1 20X}91 24- 210 959 454 1,428 66 34 TOTAL BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 4,255 ,5 2,82 SOCIAL AGENCIES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES mew: 16 1 5 625 4,34 4 19 4 3 21 1.. 20 500 RVI TOTAL HUMAM t '01 iSION ------------------------------------------ PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 131,310 109,400 112,049 12,750 19,261 19,261 15 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 26,750 22,270 21,139 2,904 5,611 5,611 21 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,050 4,190 2,695 457 2,355 2,355 47 ' TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1 ODD 830 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 19i0 i .,690 229 16,111 771 27,998 4 4 767 27,994 77 17 136,112 EL°ONU " t7EVEmENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 51,165 42,610 36,565 3,682 14,600 14,600 24 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,350 12,780 28,619 13,269- 13,269- 86 - TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20 16,660 10 10 000 --w.331 10,000 11,331 50 13 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ,515 72,050 75,184 3,682 _ DO4NiTOi REREVELOPMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES800 13 1 490 14 455 1A 1,136IT 655- 655- 5- TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT 11,4VU8:455 TOTAL COMMODITIES 450 780 95 855 855 90 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL CDBG ADMINISTRATION 750 620 390 2,%i� 750 750 100 25 CDS, MMITY PROGRAMS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 61,900 51 570 fl 44 7 44,75 2,650 17 148 17,14 17.148 17,148 28 28 TOTAL CM COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 61,900 2,650 COXA ACCESSIBILITY & NEIG IRVM TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 309 ODO 257 490 284 463 24 537 - 24 537 8 TOTAL CM ACCESSIBILITY & MEIGHBO 3 5 ,$ 3 8,527 2 37 8 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/26/91 1990-91 Y-T-D Y-T-D CUR MO UNEXPENDED UMENCUM If BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL PLANNING AND IONING DEPARTMENT CITE'S' DENTIAL REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,400 2,830 1,414 1,986 1,986 58 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITAT 1OOD ,4 83.3 119 4 , 19 490- - 19 490- _ 19- COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL. SERVICES 7,500 6,250 830 6,670 6,670 89 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,000 4,160 5,000 6651 5.000 9 665 10D 98 TOTAL 2%000 16 660 335REHABILITATI - � -19 TOTALACOOG COMMERCIALRES COOL MULTI- FAMILY REHABILITAT10 231- 231- 0 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL 33, �,_231 331,453 31684 31,'453 79 79 TOTALACDBGL14ULTI-FAMILYSREHABILITA 40, 8,547 CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES � TOTAL CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ----------------------------------------- 854,150 711,560 717,572 26,355 136,578 19 136,559 16 STREET DIVISION AND SUP LRT ADMIMISTRATI" OR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 206,585 172,100 175,910 20,024 30,675 30,675 15 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 113,500 94,560 97,939 9,562 15,561 8 15,553 186- 14 1- TOTAL COMMODITIES 14,000 11,660 14,185 764 185- 1 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2 5002 13681 --2W,06 5 30,3 46,051 9 46,042 14 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDIIMIS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 200,820 167,330 156,419 19,218 44,401 44,401 22 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 87,500 72,890 56,086 7,545 31,414 63 31,351 36 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL. EXPENDITURES 86,300 39 500 71,880 32 900 78,158 29 6,604 727 8,142 10 18 8,124 0 377 9 6 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PMC BUILDI d, 4 6 , NAINTEMANCE OF GROUNDS NAME SERVICES 126,455 105,370 118,407 4,729 8,048 8,048 6 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,500 22,910 23,654 3,846 3,846 14 31 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,950 5,770 4,820 2,130 2,130 275 7 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4 3.490 4 3.925 275 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS , , STREET MAINTEMANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 88,325 73,580 72,903 4,411 15,422 15,422 17 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 118,300 98,570 134,845 289 16,545- 16,545- 14- TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 36,60D 1 993 250 30,480 1,661.M 34,322 1,726.215 1,260 6,157 2,278 267,035 97 2,278 266,938 6 13 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 2 lir-M 1,863,650 1,968,285 12,117 268,190 97 268,093 12 STREET DIVISION SNOW REMOVAL TOTAL PERtX1AL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL LEA€ REMOVAL TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL LEAF REMOVAL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1940-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 95,710 79,740 63,664 9,567 7,000 5,820 5„661 80D 85,000 70,820 69,490 22,683 ZD.000 16,660 2 8.4 207,710 173,040 41, 33,050 71,840 59,860 80,683 673 20,000 16,660 19,057 t4 1 10,111 106.140 88,420 109,851 101 PAGE 18 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 32,046 32,046 33 1,339 1,339 19 15,510 15,510 18 14'Q AV 129 126 6 85 32 66, ,921 8,677 8,843- 8,843- 12- 944 943 5 4 189 ' 3 10- 1.112 --3-,M- _q- FORESTRY TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 199,760 166,440 158,135 12,993 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 226,250 188,510 134,185 8,677 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8,600 7,150 8,344 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL FORESTRY -60 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE! TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 44,970 37,470 53,869 5,386 TOTAL COMMODITIES 23,700 19,730 16,581 1,261 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2 000 70,E - 149 0, 6,9 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE , PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 36,385 30,300 32,596 1,139 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,OOD 8,330 9,725 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9,300 7,750 4,085 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 12.SI 10.410 8.845 TOTAL IC GROUNDS BEAUTI€ICATIO 6$ 185 56 790 55 251 t 139 TOTAL PERIAL SERVICES 11.165..... 9.300 8,278 1,043 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,800 18,150 10,181 TOTAL COMMODITIES 28 60,96550,760 23 310 6 757 22216 1.265 2,308 TOTAL MAINTERAN09 OF STATE HIGHWAY EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 113,905 94,890 87,982 7,143 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195,000 162,490 190,957 40 TOTAL COMMODITIES 130,500 108,730 102,753 8,335 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4 3 740 502 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 43,905 369, 1 4 41,625 41,625 21 92,065 87 91,978 41 256 6 250 0 -- - -ST 8,899- 8,899- 20- 7,119 39 7,480 30 1,821 T 39 --`� ga 3,789 3,789 10 275 275 3 5,215 30 5,185 56 3,655 3 655 29 12;934 12 19 2,887 2,887 26 11,619 11,619 53 75 35,750 12? 2 -3 25,924 25,923 23 4,043 4,043 2 27,747 17 27,730 21 1 998 1 998 44 VILLAGE OF NOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y-T-D Y-T-D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UNENCUN % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE GAL STREET DIVISION POOL VEHICLE NA NT NANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,835 5,680 4,685 344 2,150 2,150 31 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,500 4,570 5,000 500 500 9 TOTAL COMMODITIES 12,000 9,9_90_ 8,241 1,314 3,75599 3,759 31 TOTALCAPITALEXPENDITURES PL 1.250 _ 1.500 POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 21� 17� � 7,909 7,904 3 TRAFFIC SIGNALS # STREET LIGHTING TOTAL PERSOMAL SERVICES 6,115 5,090 695 5,420 5,420 89 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 246,000 205,000 123,607 10,507 122,393 122,393 50 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,000 5,000 4,728 1,272 1,272 21 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1 -IL4.1 13� 1 7 -9 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS i STREET LIG , 3 TOTAL STREET DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 5,213,170 4,343,560 4,112,102 185,407 1,101,071 1,509 1,099,559 21 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 231,585 192,930 192,714 21,127 38,871 38,871 17 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 675,400 562,770 596,093 58,298 79,307 170 79,137 12 TOTAL COMMODITIES 25,500 21,230 22,096 1,182 3,404 2 3,402 13 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,500 2,08D 1,508 1,508 60 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 4 .49922 ---M TOTAL AONINISTRATION AND SUPPORT , T 402,357 ��T , MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILOI s_ _ TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 43,810 36,500 33,222 2,705 10,588 10,588 24 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,500 11,230 2,894 210 10,606 23 10,583 78 TOTAL COMMODITIES 14,500 _ 12,070 15,892 1,394 1,392- 1,392- 10- TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2 _ 23D0 100 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDI 4,31 �= -rW 30E MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS TOENTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 36,135 30,080 31,876 2,201 4,259 4,259 12 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,400 4,500 1,782 822 3,619 3,618 67 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES -37-357 ._ r 7 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS �,f35 , MATER SUPPLY NAMTEl� CC, 4 REPAIR TO;AL PERSONAL SERVICES 161,535 134,600 111,121 10,547 50,414 50,414 31 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 104,000 86,660 41,802 8,896 62,199 62,198 60 TOTAL COMMODITIES 20,500 17,080 16,671 881 3,829 12 3,817 19 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES0 TOTAL WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE i R 286,5 2384$ 169,M 20,324 116,W X29 WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. i REPR. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 145,580 121,300 96,723 15,499 48,857 48,857 34 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43,950 36,610 23,726 1,119 20,224 44 20,180 46 TOTAL COMMODITIES 49,950 41,620 39,867 2,904 10,083 2 10,081 20 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 107 500 89 5.70 9 948 47 552 314 _M 47 238 4 TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. i 9, i, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 14,649 21 13,2D6 13,206 7O 2,842 WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT NAINT 5,625 5,625 9 36,322 36,322 23 fiOTAL PERS4MIAL SERVICES 88,045 73,360 88,519 6,098 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,250 1,030 433 TOTAL COMMODITIES 36,550 30,450 25,447 4,286 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 10 ODD 8 330 TOTAL WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAIN 1.5,845 1 3, 7D 1 450 15,84 1 450 11,.34 WATER METER INSTAL REPR.i REEL. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 76,695 63,E 62,782 4,967 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,ODD 30,820 23,561 TOTAL COMMODITIES 84,600 70,480 20,483 3,712 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5 8 6 8,679 TOTAL WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.B RE 223,295 8 OP RAT S TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3 000 3�1 A26` 2 500 I 1 2 4 -'-1 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE & OPEN SANITARY SEWER MAINS i, REPAIR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 70,040 58,350 55,391 5,527 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 18,950 15,780 5,744 510 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11,000 9,160 8,158 109 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 61,000 50 820 55.375 990 7,136 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER MAINT. i REPA 160,990 154, 10 124,668 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 444 OOD 369 $, 370 450 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM INPROVEMENTS ,..70,450 SANITARY SEWS IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,000 2,500 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 9,525 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES1 - 87 500 -27 493 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 15.. , , IUTAL LUNIAALIUAL *CRY -CO , ... a. ,a......TOTAL CAPITAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 8 6 7 TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISIT. 37, 2,531,6W ,2 8, 237,719 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 6,711,470 5,592,330 5,265,691 413,166 ------------------------------------------ PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 12,325 10,270 11,122 995 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42 8855-0 35 690 32.357 2 095 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ,tt5 4:, 4 ,4.- ,- PAGE 20 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL 474- 474- 1- 817 817 65 11,103 6 11,097 30 8.550 8,550 86 19,996 6 14,990 15 13,913 13,913 18 13,439 111 13,328 36 64,117 19 64,098 76 A1 6, 5 ODO 25 ODD 100 130 1 , 9 52 1 635 _ 3 42, 14,649 14,649 21 13,2D6 13,206 7O 2,842 2,842 26 5,625 5,625 9 36,322 36,322 23 73 50 7 876 72 674 16 6 76 3,000 3,000 100 9,525- 9,525- 0 22.4 - 29, 49 - -Ll-- 29,018- 27- 780, 780 10 784,92 789V2' 2b 1,445,782 1,582 1,444,197 22 1,203 1,203 10 10,493 10.493 24 11,696 11,696 21 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR No BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION 6,501- 34- 534,514 LID WASTE SPOSAL SO DI PARll' LOT MAINT€MMIC€ 16,020 25,751 2,375 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 4,370 3,640 2,768 794 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,200 8,490 5,893 396 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,800 4,820 2,112 228 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1 7 810 1-W-lw 153 3 18 TOTAL PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 1 , 270,188 250,337 DOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 232,545 193,720 207,646 4,508 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION 6,501- 34- 534,514 LID WASTE SPOSAL SO DI 19,250 16,020 25,751 2,375 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2,066,000 1,721,650 1,531,486 155,749 TOTAL COMMODITIES 80 I .000 - 42047 TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 2,165,250 1,804,320 i,500',M-7$M TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 2,165,250 1,804,320 1,599,284 158,124 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ONTOWN LOPMENT CONSTRUCTION 993,735 828,090 270,188 250,337 DOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 19g.84 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST , , FLOD CONTROL PROD CTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXP€NDITUR€S 4 3 3 4 160 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS 3,354,160 COMMUNITY IiM'ROVEM€NTS TOTAL CONTRAC AL SERVICES 12,000 10,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 113, 111.1 110 215 J 332 _ TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 145,400 121,160 IM215 cFNERA EQUIP C IMPRVMNTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 150,000 125,000 66,930 8,815 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE M.000 455,000,1 4 1 66,930 813 TOTAL GENERAL EQUIP L IMPRVMNTS MK} ElIPMENT POOL NO TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 469 200 TOTAL MDTOR EQUIPMENT POOL TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 6,190,335 5,158,520 726,958 262,449 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ITY COITNOTALCONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1415m 12 080 19.11 TOTAL COMMUNITY GROUPS 143--lyoso 19,149 4 PAGE 21 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL 1,602 1,602 37 4,307 13 4,294 42 3,688 9 3,679 63 -1.� 1 r59 24,899 35 24,864 11 6,501- 6,501- 34- 534,514 162 534,352 26 7r9 __�20D 65, 565,966 362 565,604 26 723,547 723,547 73 I .000 - 102.ODO IOD 4 , 4J 5+000 � 12,00000 12,OD0 100 2�5;i85 , 8 83,070 22 83,048 55 - H 5 102-M 40 -0 5,463,377 $45 5,'462,832 Be 4 649- 4.649- 32- 4,4, 4'- 4,649- 32- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR NO UNEXPENDED UMENCUM I BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES 4TH OF JULY &CIVIL EVENTS- ETC. TOTAL PER L SERVICES 15,000 72,480 13,828 1,172 1,172 8 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21,000 17,480 14,269 1,578 6,732 6,731 32 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10 950 9,110 8,739 46:955 39,070 36,836 4 1,582 2,211 10,115 2.211 10,114 20 22 TOTAL 4TH OF JULY & CIVIC EVENTS, HOLIDAY 9 RATIiNS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,950 2,450 2,950 2,450 100 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,500 8,750 9,676 776 824 117- 824 117- 8 12 - TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 1 000 830 1 117 � -X2;030 93 - 3.6 TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ------------------------------------------ 75,900 63,180 66,778 2,367 9,123 9,122 12 TOTAL LIBRARY OPERATIONS TOTAL LIBRARY SERVICES ------------------------------------------ 2,546,920 2,122,420 2,546,920 2,546,920 100 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1 282 35 i 068-570 1 070 701 25 264- 211,65 211,649 17 TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BOND 1,282,350 1,068,570 1,070,7 1 2 264- 211,650 211,649 17 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA 3 2 0 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 85 905 71.570 85 903 8 � 3 2 0 TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICE AREA 5, 5 71,570 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ------------------------------------------ 1,368,255 1,140,140 1,156,604 25,264- 211,653 211,651 15 PENSION FUNDS sF'�OYEE PEMSIi1FIS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE E%PENSE 7 1 617 980 611.063 59,736 130,517 130.517 18 TOTAL EMPLOYEE PENSIONS 74 617 671,083 59J36 130,517 130,517 18 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1 65 000 1 376 650 409 3 44 264 44:264 1 242 117 1, 42,11 1 242 117 1:242117 75 75 TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS ,'`,37 FIREMENS PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE fMPENSE 1 753 000 11_460 10 443,012 42,263 1 309 988 13 1 304 488 75 TOTAL FIREMENS PENSIONS 3, ,4 0 443,012 42,263 TOTAL PENSION FUNDS 4,146,600 3,455,440 1,463,978 146,263 2,682,622 2,682,622 65 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 10 ENDING 2/28/91 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL 'ACTUAL TOTAL BUDGET EXPENSE 43,571,705 26,987,594 36,305,970 2,283,905 General & Special Revenue Funds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund Motor Equipment Pool Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1991 Debt Service Fund Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION March 14, 1991 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 3/01/91 through Per Attached Journal Balance 2/28/91 3/14191 List of Bills Entry 3/14191 2,831,808 $1,455,731 $ 780,835 $ 3,506,704 495,593 2,347 11,155 486,785 4,853 - 1,668 3,185 38,044 172,217 68,084 142,177 2,922,287 576,381 339,819 3,158,849 180,381 6,695 3,728 183',348 1,211,629 14,948 43,673 1,182,904 355,813 1,747 455 357,105 333,0361 101,383 3,755 430,664 175,924 1,595 406 177,113 776,825 225,785 12,795 989,815 6,632 3,600 10,108 124 1,295,049 45,343 14,437 1,325,955 15,481,310 28,286 15,509,596 17,464,396 29,500 - 17,493,896 257.924 2 167 255.757 $<,1.831,504 `82.665.558 $1.293.085 S $45,203.977 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS JUANITA ACEVEDO REFUND OVERPMT $5.00 $5.00 THE AIR CONDITIONING & HTG. CO BOND REFUND C8505 $100.00 $100.00 ARMCOR DESIGN & BUILD BOND REFUND C5862 $100.00 $100.00 ARNOLD SEWER BOND REFUND C7987 $75.00 $75.00 BABBIN & ASSOC. BOND REFUND C5166 $475.00 BOND REFUND C5821 $100.00 $575.00 DAVID BLACK BOND REFUND C8364 $100.00 BOND REFUND C8365 $100.00 $200.00 STEPHEN CABOOR REFUND TREE DEPOSIT $50.00 $50.00 CITIBANK, N.A. PMT INS CLAIMS -GAB $7,804.09 PMT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS $142.50 $7,946.59* CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PMT P/R 3/07/91 $224.25 $224.25* CUSTOM CLIMATE BOND REFUND C8528 $100.00 $100.00 DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT P/R ENDING 3/07/91 $367,054.49 P/R ENDING 3/07/91 $1,326.68 P/R ENDING 3/07/91 $870.78 P/R ENDING 3/07/91 $34,271.99 P/R ENDING 3/14/91 $8,445.91 P/R ENDING 3/1491 $23,620.99 $435,590.84* DOMINICK FOOD STORES BOND REFUND C85 3 $100.00 $100.00 FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS. BONDS P/R 3/07/91 $300.00 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3/7 $10,408.35 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3/7 $100.39 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3/7 $2,572.98 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3/7 $914.34 ( DUE TO FED DEP PAY 3/7 $65.94 $14,362.00* FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS MEDICAL BENEFIT REIMB 3/14/91 $8,351.65 DEPENDENT CARE REIMB 3/14/ 1 $1,756.00 $10,107.65* BRUCE HILDNER REFUND R/E TAX OVERPMT $210.00 $210.00* ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT EMPLOYEE SHARE -FEBRUARY $16,809.67 EMPLOYER SHARE -FEBRUARY $40,866.15 $57,675.82* IRENE S. JANIGA REFUND FINAL BILL $2.28 REFUND FINAL BILL $.22 $2.50 MARION JOHNSON REFUND FINAL BILL $22.80 REFUND FINAL BILL $2.20 $25.00 ANDREA JUSZCZYK PMT P/R 3/07/91 $254.00 $254.00* VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS MICHAEL J. KRUCHTEN PING WEN KUGHUNG JEAN LE SERVE LEVIN ASSOC. ARCH. SAM LOUCKES OPUS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM ANDREA C. RICARD SCARSDALE DEVELOPMENT, LTD, LAWRENCE R. SCHNEIDER SIGNS OF DISTINCTION INC. STATE OF ILLINOIS SUNTECH DESIGNS THIRD DISTRICT CIRCUIT COURT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION DRUG ENFORCEMENT BOND REFUND C6164 AMBULANCE OVERPAYMENT BOND REFUND C8464 BOND REFUND C7653 BOND REFUND C7653 BOND REFUND C8222 BOND REFUND C8362 BOND REFUND C6547 MISC EXPENSES POSTAGE METER ADV DEP REFUND TICKET OVERPMT BOND REFUND C6647 REFUND FINAL BILL REFUND FINAL BILL BOND REFUND LIQUOR APPLICANT RECORD CK LIQUOR APR RECORD CHECK BOND REFUND BOND MONEY BOND MONEY REINSPECTION FEE C1794 REINSPECTION FEE C4506 REINSPECTION FEE C5166 REINSPECTION FEE C6035 REINSPECTION FEE C6164 REINSPECTION FEE C6481 REINSPECTION FEE C6547 REINSPECTION FEE C6647 REINSPECTION FEE C7987 PAGE 2 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $1,200.00 $1,200.00* $375.00 $375.00 $125.00 $125.00 $100.00 $100.00 $30.00 $3,000.00* $25.00 $55.00 $500.00 $500-00 X64:59 T'n ,- ,NA 7G $100.00 $100.00 $200.00 $320.00 $320.00 $90.00 $90.00* $3,000.00 $3,000.00* $6.00 $6.00 $25.00 $25.00 $9.12 $.88 $10.00 $100.00 $100.00 $66.00 $33.00 $99.00= $75.00 $75.00* $2,200.00 $1,600.00 $1,600.00 $5,400.00 $100.00 $100.00 $25.00 $25.00 $125.00 $50.00 $180.00 $75.00 $25.00 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VIVA NAIL AND BODY SALON CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION REINSPECTION FEE C8016 FEB TR TO RISK MGMT FUND FEB TR TO RISK MGMT FUND FEB TR TO RISK MGMT FUND FEB TR TO GENERAL FUND FEB TR TO GENERAL FUND FEB TR TO D/T 1987C B&I FEB TR TO IMRF FUND FEB TR TO IMRF FUND FEB TR TO IMRF FUND FEB TR TO IMRF FUND FEB TR TO IMRF FUND FEB TR TO IMRF FUND REFUND FINAL BILL REFUND FINAL BILL GENERAL FUND $519,803.33 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $68,084.17 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $1,532.37 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 $5,300.00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D $270.00 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $14,437.31 PAGE 3 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $50.00 $755.00 $19,950.00 $121,175.00 $400.00 $3,074.06 $22,216.40 $270.00 $167,085.46 $241.37 $8,451.90 $5,300.00 $7,224.72 $1,340.00 $195.65 $22,753.64 $13.68 $1.32 $15.00 ***TOTAL** $732,407.01 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,668.44 WATER & SEWER FUND $96,032.43 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $7,946.59 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974 $7,224.72 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $10,107.65 ******************************************************************************************************** PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY DONATION-HUECKER $50.00 $50.00* BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS FLOWER ARRANGEMENT $38.50 FLOWER ARRANGEMENT $132.00 FLOWER ARRANGEMENT $33.00 FLOWER ARRANGEMENT $33.00 $236.50 *********#********************************************************************************************** VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ARNSTEIN & LEHR BURKE AND RYAN CERTIFIED REPORTING COMPANY JOHN F. DIXON FAHEY MEDICAL CENTER, S.C. HEWLETT PACKARD PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS, LEGAL SERVICES -JANUARY LEGAL SERVICES SEPT -JAN SERVICES RENDERED ADVANCE EXPENSES-ICMA MTG ILCMA CONF-EXPENSES MED EXAM-SCHWIEGER REPAIR PRINTER MISC EXPENSES Wf',T7TDUVMfP QUOT? MWIP RRNF.WAT. $7,230.51 $187.50 $31.50 $815.00 $12.95 $75.00 $342.50 $19.84 S105.00 $7,230.51 $187.50 $31.50 $827.95 $75.00 $342.50 $19.84* $105.00 $37.8F VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $9,195.42 GENERAL FUND $9,195.42 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3%1491 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY MTG EXPENSES $8.91 $626.00 $8.91 $626.00 FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC FLAGS & SUPPLIES $60.00 $60.00* NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE REGISTRATIONS $50.25 $50.25 SCHWEPPE & SONS SUPPLIES PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,031.66 *********#********************************************************************************************** VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ARNSTEIN & LEHR BURKE AND RYAN CERTIFIED REPORTING COMPANY JOHN F. DIXON FAHEY MEDICAL CENTER, S.C. HEWLETT PACKARD PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS, LEGAL SERVICES -JANUARY LEGAL SERVICES SEPT -JAN SERVICES RENDERED ADVANCE EXPENSES-ICMA MTG ILCMA CONF-EXPENSES MED EXAM-SCHWIEGER REPAIR PRINTER MISC EXPENSES Wf',T7TDUVMfP QUOT? MWIP RRNF.WAT. $7,230.51 $187.50 $31.50 $815.00 $12.95 $75.00 $342.50 $19.84 S105.00 $7,230.51 $187.50 $31.50 $827.95 $75.00 $342.50 $19.84* $105.00 $37.8F VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $9,195.42 GENERAL FUND $9,195.42 ******************************************************************************************************** ******************************************************************************************************** FINANCE DEPARTMENT ARMOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $24.65 PAGE 5 AT&T ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $368.73 $368.73, COFFEE BREAK, INC. PAYMENT DATE 3114/91 $53.00 $53.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION DATA PROCESSING SERVICES $640.00 $640.00 LARRY CULTON COMM ASST ZONING BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 EDWARD FRANCE COMM ASST BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 HOMETOWN USA VIDEO FESTIVAL VIDEO CONTEST FEE $35.00 $35.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $50.00 $50.00 JOHN KEANE COMM ASST ZONING BD MTG $25.00 $1,658.52 PEDERSEN & HOUPT COMM ASST $25.00 $50.00 MELANIE KRUPP COMM ASST C 0 W MTG $25.00 $25.00 PHYLLIS MOLIERE COMM ASST $25.00 $25.00 SUSAN MUELLER COMM ASST $25.00 $25.00 NFLCP-N.E. ILLINOIS CHAPTER 2 MTG REGISTRATIONS $24.00 $24.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $6.43 $6.43* FRANK SMITH COMM ASST BD MTG $25.00 $25.00 COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION ***TOTAL** $315.43 GENERAL FUND $315.43 ******************************************************************************************************** FINANCE DEPARTMENT ARMOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION PMT DUE ON COLLECTION $24.65 $24.65 AT&T 016 089 7465 001 $368.73 $368.73, COFFEE BREAK, INC. COFFEE $53.00 $53.00 DECISION DATA SERVICE INC. PRINTER MTCE-MARCH $84.00 $84.00 GEORGE J. HAMMES DATA PROCESSING SERVICES $640.00 $640.00 CHARLES R. HARDY & ASSOCIATES CONSULTING SERVICES $500.00 $500.00 HEWLETT PACKARD SERVICE $440.00 $440.00 I.B.M. CORPORATION MAR MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER $194.00 MAR MICE COMPUTERS & PRINTER $52.00 $246.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $1,658.52 $1,658.52 PEDERSEN & HOUPT TRANSFER TAX TRANSACTIONS 2/91 $110.00 $110.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $68.95 MISC EXPENSES $4.27 $73.22* VENDOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. RCM DATA CORP SENTRY ENVELOPE CO. SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE XL/DATACOMP INC. FINANCE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PROGRA14MING SERVICES $1,035.00 $1,035.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $93.57 $55.10 $148.67 OFFICE SUPPLIES $37.80 $37.80 SUPPLIES ENVELOPES $558.52 $558.52 DELIVERIES $18.20 $18.20 CHCS 1090 COPIER $1,722.00 .... . . MARCH -42 MICE SERVICE ***TOTAL** $7,907.10 $7,907.10 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL PAGE $105.50 LEGAL PAGE $68.57 $174.07 P.F. PETTIBONE & COMPANY SUPPLIES $199.65 $199.65 cmFur.T {'nDTFIERS. INC. SUPPLEMENTS/BOOKLETS $1,682.11 ^CnC AA C9 Ini RF VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND. $2,681.27 ***TOTAL** $2,681. VENDOR RISK MANAGEMENT ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. THOMAS W. BENNETT, D.C. BROOKFIELD CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS. FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE C GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC. GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC. HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL GEORGE B. LAUBER LUTHERAN GENERAL MED. GR.,S.C. NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLAIM 1010853214 $917.11 $917.11 W/C CLAIM $737.00 $737.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 3/11 $28,750.85 $28,750.85* RISK MGMT STUDY $500.00 $500.00 MARCH 91 LIFE INS. $2,085.97 $2,085.97 -- SERVICES FEES -MARCH $578.75 PUBLICATION JAN -PD CLAIMS EXPENSE $18.00 $596.75 REIMBURSEMENT $115.00 $94.35 REIMBURSEMENT $85.50 $200.50 SERVICES RENDERED -POPE $736.50 $736.50 MAILBOX REIMBURSEMENT $131.40 $131.40 SERVICES RENDERED-KEADY $54.00 $54.00 SERVICES RENDERED $152.40 $152.40 P-14 BODY REPAIRS $213.44 P-9 BODY REPAIRS $233.90 BODY REPAIRS P-7 $416.30 $863.64 ***TOTAL** $35,726.12 $35,726.12 ******************************************************************************************************** INSPECTION SERVICES ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY SERVICE LOCK $64.00 $64.00 BACKFLOW PREVENTION REFERENCE MATERIAL $18.50 $18.50 BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC. REFERENCE MATERIAL $60.00 $60.00 CABELA'S TRAPS $175.70 $175.70 CRSI PUBLICATION $23.50 $23.50 ENGELHARD CORPORAION SUPPLIES $94.35 $94.35 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE SEMINAR FEE-ROELS $20.00 $20.00 JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS 2 YR SUBSCRIPTION $40.00 $40.00 MASONRY ADVISORY COUNCIL PUBLICATION $34.50 $34.50 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 AETNA TRUCK PARTS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $148.72 $224.16 $372.88 AMERICAN RUNNING &FITNESS ASSN PAYMENT DATE 3%14/91 $25.00 $25.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES BLACRHAi+iK AMMUNITION SUPPLY AMMtiNIIN' $175.52 MIDWEST LASER SUPPLY CO. 1 LASER LEVELING SYSTEM $2,495.00 $2,495.00 NAT'L. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM REGISTRATION-ERB $75.00 $75.00* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $4.28 $6.57 $10.85* THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S MISC EXPENSES INSPECTIONS $77.00 $183.59 $77.00 $183.59 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES $ ao a $127.87 $280.68 XEROX CORP MICE FEE �ITGE EE PRODUCT MICE $595.80 INSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL** $3,419.78 GENERAL FUND $3,419.78 ******************************************************************************************************** POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS MICE SUPPLIES $148.72 $224.16 $372.88 AMERICAN RUNNING &FITNESS ASSN SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $25.00 $25.00 AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION SERVICE $343.53 $39.83 $383.36 SERVICE ` v' BLACRHAi+iK AMMUNITION SUPPLY AMMtiNIIN' $175.52 $175.52 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. SUPPLIES WASH PLAN -FEB 91 $280.00 $280.00 CLASSLINE, INC. ID BADGE COMPUTER SUPPLIES $32.50 $98.00 $32.50 $98.00 COMPUTERLAND FRANKLIN C. COOK SUBSCRIPTION $36.50 $36.50 JOHN DAHLBERG EXPENSES $85.28 $85.28 HANSEN ASSOCIATES MICE & ADDTL COPIES MTCE & ADDTL COPIES $127.87 $280.68 $408.55 HEWLETT PACKARD PRODUCT MICE $595.80 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT PRODUCT MICE $92.40 $688.20 ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF REGISTER-RICHARDSON $25.00 $25.00* ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $37.83 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $25.98 SERVICE $300.00 SERVICE $100.00 $494.44 JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS SUBSCRIPTION $22.00 $22.00 K-MAX INTERNATIONAL, INC. EQUIPMENT $135.50 $135.50 MAUREEN KERRIGAN TRNG EXPENSE $131.20 $131.20 LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC. PHOTO SUPPLIES $226.75 PHOTO SUPPLIES $207.50 $434.25 LITTLE AMERICA PRISONER FOOD FEB 91 $172.10 $172.10 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC SUPPLIES $59.42 SUPPLIES $47.84 $107.26 MAG INSTRUMENT, INC. SUPPLIES $18.00 $18.00 MIDWEST TRAINING ACADEMY REGISTER-MOSERJLEE $180.00 REGISTRATION-SCHMIDT $90.00 $270.00* MOTRA TRANSMISSIONS REBUILD TRANSMISSION $750.00 REBUILD TRANSMISSION $772.00 $1,522.00 MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO AUTO PARTS-FEB 91 $231•.90 $231.90 NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION COUN BOOKLETS $45.52 BOOKLETS $45.49 BOOKLETS $45.52 BOOKLETS $45.52 BOOKLETS $5.52 $187.5-- DAVID T. NICHOLSON ADVANCE EXPENSES $600.00 $600.00* NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI TUITION-BELMONTE, SCHMITZ $90.00 TUITION-KOTLARZ $25.00 $115.00 RAY O'HERRON CO., INC. SQUAD EQUIPMENT $129.16 $129.16 ORDER FROM HORDER SUPPLIES $131.31 SUPPLIES $131.30 $262.61 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $12.35 MISC EXPENSES $75.02 MISC EXPENSES $36.24 MISC EXPENSES $7.28 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT ERIC E. PIEE PRINTMARK INDUSTRIES INC. PUBLIC AGENCY TRAINING COUNCIL QUALEX, INC. QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. WILLIAM ROSCOP SECRETARY OF STATE STOFFEL SEALS CORPORATION STREICHER'S VITAL RECORD BANC, INC. WIPECO INC POLICE DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT. PAYMENT DATE 3%14/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL MISC EXPENSES $18.00 MISC EXPENSES $14.70 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $3.38 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $1.90 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $11.84 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $17.60 MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $7.00 � t RADIO} REPAIRS SUPPLIES $68.50 $68.50 TUITION-CHARAK $125.00 $125.00 SUPPPLIES $5.67 - SUPPLIES $2.70 $8.37 ALARM REPORTS $109.10 $109.10 EXPENSES $32.00 $32.00 VEHICLE STICKERS $96.00 $96.00 SUPPLIES $308.00 $308.00 SUPPLIES $130..60 $130.60 MICROFILMING $366.68 $366.68 CLNG SUPPLIES $154.00 $154.00 MTCE SERVICE MARCH $62.10 $62.10 GENES FLING 0.4 ***TOTAL** $9,620.46 FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BLDG SUPPLIES $36.86 BLDG SUPPLIES $28.51 $65.37 AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC. CASCADE STORAGE - Y TEM $3,333.00 $3,333.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14191 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. AMERICAN SOC. FOR PUBL. ADMIN. RENEWAL ASPA NEWS $55.00 $55.00 DON ANDERSON ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS $45.00 SEMINAR REGISTRATION $20.00 $65.00 ARLINGTON HTS. FIRE ACADEMY REGISTRATION-LUBASH $375.00 $375.00 BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC. SUPPLIES $41.50 SUPPLIES $37.95 $79.4 CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS 070 0057060 0 $142.13 $142.13 CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE, SERVICE $101.00 SERVICE $80.10 $181.10 COMMONWEALTH EDISON ANNUAL RENTAL CHRG $37.20 $37.20 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BA77-JT-2404-A $8.29 $8.29 THE CONFERENCE CORPORATION JEMS CONF REGISTRATION $225.00 $225.00 DATA PREFERENCE COMPUTER $1,695.00 $1,695.00 HENRY DAWSON EXPENSES $5.00 $5.00 DOLTON FIRE EQUIP SALES, INC. HOSE REPAIRS $701.00 $701.00 DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS MICE SUPPLIES $70.88 $70.88 EDUCATION ALLIANCE TECHNICAL SERVICE $187.50 $187.50 FEDERAL SIGNAL CORPORATION MICE SUPPLIES $46.77 $46.77 EHRHARDT'S TRAILER SALES, INC MICE SUPPLIES $60.70 $60.70 GALL'S, INC. SUPPLIES $29.79 $29.79 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT BADGES $45.95 $45.95 H R HART PHOTO PHOTO SUPPLIES $78.61 $78.61 HANSEN ASSOCIATES MICE & ADDTL COPIES $127.87 $127.87 TONY HUEMANN EXPENSES $10.00 $10.00 ILL. SOC. OF FIRE SERVICE INST REGISTER DUMOVICH/ULREICH $30.00 $30.0 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $37.82 SERVICE $192.14 SERVICE $75.08 ,SERVICE $400.00 SERVICE $98.00 $803.04 ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN. BROCHURES $474.00 $474.00 INT'L ASSN OF ARSON INVESTIGA MEMBERSHIP DUES THRU 12131191 $37.00 $37.00 LONNIE JACKSON EXPENSES $50.00 $50.00 LAB SAFETY SUPPLY CABINET $409.81 CABINET $409.81 CABINET $409.67 $1,229.29 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC OFFICE SUPPLIES $21.75 $99.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES $57.38 $133.24 $311.37 MACWAREHOUSE COMPUTER SUPPLIES $248.00 $250.00 $248.00 $250.00 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC.. SERVICE COPY MACHINE $71.85 $71.85 NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE FLOOR MATS mrmm gh iFICi 0 � M �,. _., �, .�� =.. @V ICS . NORTHWEST PETROLEUM TERM114ALLI 1991 MEMEBERSHIP DUES $ $76.55 $�U $76.55 ORDER FROM BORDER ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY OFFICE SUPPLIES BIOSYSTEMS MONITOR $2,141.05 $2,141.05 $37.76 QUALEX, INC. RED WING SHOE STORE SUPPLIES BOOTS -JACKSON $37.76 $110.00 $110.00 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION SERVICE PARTS $67.50 $62.92 $67.50 $62.92 SAFETY SUPPLY ILLINOIS RESCUE EQUIPMENT MICE SUPPLIES $22.55 $22.55 SCHMERLER FORD INC. DENNIS THILL - F.D. EXPENSES $60.14 $60.14 TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN. MICE SUPPLIES $37.32 $75.33 MICE SUPPLIES MTCE SUPPLIES $34.60 $147.25 PAUL VALENTINE REIMB EXPENSES $179.81 $49.99 $179.81 $49.99 WALGREENS WASHINGTON CAPITAL NEWS REPORT CLOCK RADIO SUBSCRIPTION REVEWAL $75.00 $75.00 .�DEFT . .._, > . m.. ......, �,..� ..... ,,,�� ..�� .. �� * * *TOTL* * �� X17 GENERAL FUND $17,121.77 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES $803.30 $813.91 VENDOR HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION WILL ASHLEY LEONARD W. BAZAN DARYL BOYD COMMUNITY CAB CO. DES PLAINES OFFICE EQUIPMENT C CAROLYN HENDERSON BILL HESS ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. INSTITUTE FOR NATURAL RESOURCE KEEFER'S PHARMACY LISA LEVIN RAY LUNDIN EARLE MATTSON NANCY MORGAN THE SALVATION ARMY SET ENVIRONMENTAL INC. JEANNE SHERMAN BERTHA STEIL SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. KATHI WESLEY HELEN WHITLOCK VIRGINIA ZITO VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SENIOR TAXI RIDES $262.05 $1,065.35 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $12.00 $12.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $27.00 $27.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $12.00 $12.00 SENIOR TAXI RIDES $103.85 $103 82, SUPPLIES $134.00 $134:01 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $12.00 $12.00 HDM.DRIVER REIMB FEB $9.00 $9.00 SERVICE $400.00 $400.00 REGISTRATION $44.00 $44.00 MED SUPPLIES $119.90 $119.90 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $6.00 - $6.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $21.00 $21.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $12.00 $12.00 VOLUNTEER LUNCHEON $198.45 $198.45 BUDGET ALLOCATION $1,875.00 $1,875.00 DISPOSAL $30.00 $30.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $9.00 $9.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $12.00 $12.00 CABINET $208.50 $208.50 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $12.00 $12.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $6.00 $6.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB FEB $12.00 $12.00 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ***TOTAL** $4,341.0`, GENERAL FUND $4,341.05 ******************************************************************************************************** PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT CHICAGO SKYLINE DISPLAY INC. DISPLAY EQUIPMENT $370.51 $370.51 JOHN H. CROUCH TITLE SLIDES $110.00 $110.00 VENDOR PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14191 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT PAGE 14 TOTAL PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC EXPO AD $250.00 $250.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $57.95 $67.54 $125.49* UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS MISC EXPENSES REGISTER SIMS & FRITZ $260.00 $260.00 VANS ARTISTS DESIGNERS SUFFLIEMONTHLY FEQUITY PLAN $141.28 $141.28 XEROX CORP. $327.41 SERVICES RENDERED $285.00 �. SIGNAL MTCE FEB91. $1,968.75 �� -OV COLD PATCHING SUPPLIES $166.60 GENERAL FUND STREET DIVISION ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. AETNA TRUCK PARTS ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. ALLEN TESTPRODUCTS ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO. ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER $1,282.79 BLDO SUPPLIES $52.88 BLDG SUPPLIES $61.06 BLDG SUPPLIES $50.62 $164.56 14TCE SUPPLIES $211.43 PARTS_-_ $57.99 -__ PARTS $57.99 $327.41 SERVICES RENDERED $285.00 SIGNAL MTCE FEB91. $1,968.75 �� -OV COLD PATCHING SUPPLIES $166.60 COLD PATCHING SUPPLIES $841.50 COLD PATCHING SUPPLIES $606.90 $1,615.00 SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $60.00 $60.00 MICE AGREEMENT $140.00 $140.00 SERVICES RENDERED $51.00 SUPPPLIES $42.95 KEYS $18.00 $111.95 SUPPLIES $402.00- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION SUPPLIES $175.53 SUPPLIES $220.89 SUPPLIES $328.08 SUPPLIES $317.20 SUPPLIES $290.14 SUPPLIES $27.49 SUPPLIES $421.88 SUPPLIES $118.70 SUPPLIES $405.15 $1,903.06 BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO. REPAIRS $56.00 $56.00 BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. VEHICLE WASH FEB 91 $52.50 $52.50 CADE INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES $300.00 SUPPLIES $300.00 CLNG SUPPLIES $346.50 CLNG SUPPLIES $170.75 CLNG SUPPLIES $159.00 CLNG SUPPLIES $86.00 $1,362.25 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS JANITORIAL SERVICE $2,076.00 $2,076.00 COMMONWEALTH EDISON SERVICE JAN 91 $8,574.55 SERVICE $5,351.14 $13,925.69 CONRAD AND SON SUPPLIES $145.36 $145.36 DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. SERVICES RENDERED $1,100.46 SERVICE DOOR $255.36 $1,355.82 DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS MICE SUPPLIES $48.60 $48.60, DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS, IN SUPPLIES $10.50 $10.54, EBERHART STEEL PRODUCTS CORP. SUPPLIES $70.32 $70.32 G & K SERVICES, INC. UNIFORM SERVICE $152.92 UNIFORM SERVICE $152.93 $305.85 GMC TRUCK OPERATION MTCE SUPPLIES $3.83 $3.83 HELLER LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES $3.09 $3.09 HOYLE ROAD EQUIPMENT CO. CHANNEL POSTS $925.00 $925.00 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES $5.15 $5.15 MATERIAL SYSTEMS, INC. MTCE SUPPLIES $84.21 $84.21 MEYER MATERIAL CO. MATERIALS $27.00 $27.00 MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM REGISTRATION-ANGELL $17.00 $17.00* MOUNT PROSPECT LAWNMOWER EQUIPMENT $92.00 VENDOR STREET DIVISION MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC PROSAFETY QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES ROUTE 12 RENTAL CO., INC. SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY SENTRY MAINTENANCE BETTY SOMMARTO SOUND INCORPORATED STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY TCI OF ILLINOIS TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3114/91 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION EQUIPMENT EQUIPMENT AUTO PARTS -FEB 91 AUTO PARTS -FEB 91 MICE SUPPLIES MTCVE SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & EXPENSES TRAVEL & EXPENSES TRAVEL & EXPENSES TRAVEL & EXPENSES FIRST AID SUPPLIES PARTS PARTS PARTS STORM SEWER RODDER RENTAL & CABLE SUPPLIES SfW SHARE COST PROGRAM SEECURITY SERVICE MISC PLBG SUPPLIES MISC PLBG SUPPLIES PLBG SUPPLIES P W CABLE ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES PAGE 16 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $8.00 $38.00 $138.00 $376.34 $36.84 $413.18 $78.59 $40.62 521.79 $141.00 $.40 $198.20 $'78.44 $82.00 $12.42 $75.00 $4.93 $12.55 $9.95 $217.76 $3.00 $9.50 $3.31 $.50 $143.50* $159.20 $159.20 $14.84 $49.00 $49.24 $113.08 $9;236.60 $9,236.60 $68.00 523.50 $91.50 $198.20 $198.20 $82.00 $82.00 $75.00 $75.00 $47.98 $47.97 $121.81 $217.76 $9.50 $9.50 $51.56 $13.79 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3%14191 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES 1 $9.79 $75.14 VULCAN SIGN SIGN MATERIAL $1,600.00 SIGN MATERIAL $249.88 SIGN MATERIAL $1,030.12 $2,880.00 WIPECO INC CLNG SUPPLIES $333.00 $333.00 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO CLNG SVCE $245.00 CLNG SVCE $245.00 CLNG SVCS $245.00 $735.00 STREET DIVISION ***TOTAL** $46,448.27 GENERAL FUND $33,809.58 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $11,154.99 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND $1,483.70 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BLDG SUPPLIES $8.69 BLDG SUPPLIES $9.69 CR -BLDG SUPPLIES $6.74-. BLDG SUPPLIES $11.00 $22.64 AETNA TRUCK PARTS MICE SUPPLIES $55.31 MICE SUPPLIES $113.54 $168.85 ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COLD PATCHING SUPPLIES $756.50 $756.50 AM= -LIN PRODUCTS, INC. CLNG SUPPLIES $510.00 CLNG SUPPLIES $58.32 $568.32 ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS PARTS -FEB 91 $69.87 $69.87 AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES MICE -FEB 91 $550.00 $550.00 AWWA SUPPLIES $31.30 $31.30 MELVYN BOTH ADVANCE EXPENSES $231.75 $231.75 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER SUPPLIES $402.00 - SUPPLIES $175.53 SUPPLIES $220.89 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION SUPPLIES $290.13 SUPPLIES $118.69 SUPPLIES $114.70 SUPPLIES $405.15 $923.09 BRADLEY UNIVERSITY SEMINAR-MEL BOTH $65.00 $22.50 $65.00 $22.50 THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY MTCE SUPPLIES REIMB-SAFETY SHOES $50.00 $50.00 DAVID BUBLITZ x$44.50 ,,m..,�� ,... .$� 4 :, 35-. ,...�..._...:. :.::::: 1a� :::145 35 $�..,.. CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK OPER/MAINT COSTS - JAWA $17,557.00 VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS - JAWA $107,321.00 LAKE WATER PURCHASE - JAWA $90,699.00 POWER COSTS - JAWA $9,694.00 $225,271.00 DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS MTCE SUPPLIES $48.60 $78.31 $48.60 $78.31 ENGLEWOOD FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP MICE SUPPLIES DELIVERY $35.25 $35.25 THE FILE MART SUPPLIES $61.25 $152.93 $61.25 G & K SERVICES, INC. UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICE $152.92 $305.85 GMC TRUCK OPERATION MICE SUPPLIES $243.16 $243.16 W. W. GRAINGER INC. GREELEY AND HANSEN SUPPLIES CONSULTING SERVICE $4.23 $5,348.96 $4.23 $5,348.96 H-B-K WATER METER SERVICE METER SERVICE LABOR $133.41 $111.18 METER SERVICE-LABOR MATERIALS $107.02 METER SERVICE LABOR $88'.44 METER SERVICE LABOR $244.59 MATERIALS $346.60 METER SERVICE LABOR $244.59 MATERIALS $10.38 $1,375.65 I.B.M. CORPORATION MAR MICE COMPUTERS & PRINTER $194.00 $100.43 MTCE AGREEMENT MAR MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER $52.00 $346.43 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. SERVICE $203.83 SERVICE $30.20 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION SERVICE $533.12 SERVICE $36.50 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $30.63 SERVICE $61.25 SERVICE $97.32 SERVICE $19.23 SERVICE $300.00 SERVICE $21.32 $1,364.03 ILLINOIS SAFETY COUNCIL REGISTRATION -MC INTOSH $25.00 $25.00* JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL $22.00 $22.00 LAND AND LAKES CO REFUSE DISPOSAL -FEB $255.20 $255.20 LCOMP INC. MTCE SUPPLIES $269.04 $269.04 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES $18.50 $18.50 MCMASTER-CARR MTCE SUPPLIES $67.24 $67.24 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC. TONER $175.07 $175.07 MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO AUTO PARTS -FEB 91 $303.51 AUTO PARTS -FEB 91 $13.07 $316.58 NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC MTCE SUPPLIES $31.61 $31.61 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $43.74 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $9.16 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $16.80 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $1.59 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $2.00 ' TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $142.90 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $1.20 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $6.39 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $44.48 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $73.64 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $4.29 $346.19* POSTMASTER POSATAGE FOR WATER BILLS $553.81 $553.81* POWER PAK, INC. MTCE SUPPLIES $518.87 $518.87 PROSAFETY FIRST AID SUPPLIES $47.90 FIRST AID SUPPLIES $159.20 $207.10 QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL PARTS $5.66 PARTS $43.40 ******************************************************************************************************** PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION 534fi.20 5346.20 DEAN'S CONCRETE SPECIALTIES, I VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $124.28 PAGE 20 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $224.14 $348.42 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO PAYMENT DATE 314%91 $245.00 $245.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND PARTS $25.33 PARTS $2.30 PARTS $147.80 $73.90 $298.39 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION PARTS SERVICES RENDERED $165.12 $36.82 $165.12 $36.82 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES ICAL SUPPLIES 11.10 $11.10 iA-EES $308.00 WIPECO INC CLNG SUPPLIES CLNG SUPPLIES $231.00 CLNG SUPPLIES $231.00 $560.00 $770.00 $560.00 ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS MTCE SUPPLIES WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ***TOTAL** $243,787.03 WATER & SEWER FUND $243,787.03 ******************************************************************************************************** PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION 534fi.20 5346.20 DEAN'S CONCRETE SPECIALTIES, I SUPPLIES $124.28 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA 19 NORTHWEST HWY $224.14 $348.42 WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO CLNG SVCE $245.00 $245.00 ***TOTAL** $2,195.71 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $2,195.71 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21 ACCOUNTS,PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES FEB 91 REFUSE COLLECTION $13,748.57 FEB 91 REFUSE COLLECTION $4,582.34 FEB 91 REFUSE COLLECTION $137,380.36 $155,711.27 REHRIG PACIFIC CO. RECYCLING BINS $920.00 $920.00 SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHARGE $8,091.00 $8,091.00, REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $164,722.27 GENERAL FUND $164,722.27 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BLDG SUPPLIES $48.60 BLDG SUPPLIES $15.80 BLDG SUPPLIES $4.B6 BLDG SUPPLIES $17.96 $87.22 BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE DISPOSAL $592.00 $592.00 BURKE AND RYAN LEGAL SERVICES SEPT -JAN $406.25 $406.25 CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HOUS EQUIPMENT RENTAL. $50.00 $50.00 HELLER LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES $9.92 SUPPLIES $81.91 SUPPLIES $16.38 $108.21 ITEC TRUCK PART $425.00 $425.00 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES $184.04 SUPPLIES $4.70 SUPPLIES $13.05 SUPPLIES $5.80 SUPPLIES $28.59 SUPPLIES $16.78 SUPPLIES $97.80 $350.76 MONTGOMERY WARD & CO. EQUIPMENT $143.84 EQUIPMENT $75.99 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 PAGE 22 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES GENERAL FUND $1,056.50 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ***TOTAL** $1,056.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLOOD LOAN INTEREST D 3/1/91 $493.05 FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL D 3/1/91 $3,150.68 $3,643.73 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ***TOTAL** $3,643.73 EQUIPMENT $16.99 $236.82 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES $32.45 $29.99 $32.45* $29.99 PROSPECT BIKE SHOP EQUIPMENT ***TOTAL** $2,318.70 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC BANNER INSTALLATION $807.50 $36.00 $807.50 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TRAVEL & EXPENSES $42.00 $78.00* WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO CLNG SERVICE $171.00 $171.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES GENERAL FUND $1,056.50 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ***TOTAL** $1,056.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLOOD LOAN INTEREST D 3/1/91 $493.05 FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL D 3/1/91 $3,150.68 $3,643.73 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ***TOTAL** $3,643.73 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT. PAYMENT DATE 3/14/91 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $3,643.73 PENSION FUNDS FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS. WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $200.0 CHARLES W. NICK MARCH 91 PENSION $883.22 $883.22 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT APRIL MEDICAL INSURANCE $390.00 $390.00 PAUL H. WATKINS MARCH DISABILITY BENEFIT $1,576.83 $1,576.83 PENSION FUNDS ***TOTAL** $3,050.05 GENERAL FUND $883.22 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $1,293,086.03 DATE RUN 3/14/91 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TIME RUN 10.08.30 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING SUMMARY BY FUND 3/14%91 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $780,835.36 22 MOTOR FUEL TAY FUND $11,154.99 23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,668.44 24 ILL, MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $68,084.17 31 BENEFIT TRUST #2 $2,166.83 41 WATER & SEWER FUND $339,819.46 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $3,728.08 48 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND $454.99 672.71 AU PTRX MANAGEMENT FUND $43,672.71 60 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1973 4:.�uu vu 61 CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974 $7:r224.72 68 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11987D $270.00 73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $10,107.65 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $14,437.31 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,293,086.03 PAGE 24 ID-APPBAR P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N WHEREAS, education is a lifelong process; and WHEREAS, public education is a community enterprise; and WHEREAS, the skills, talents and experiences of senior citizens are untapped resources in many communities; and WHEREAS, inter -generational cooperation promotes efficient use of human resources; and WHEREAS, local residents have a right to be involved in deciding how the resources of their communities will be used; and WHEREAS, community education promotes the use of community resources and community volunteers in schools, senior citizen centers and community agencies, the use of human resources to provide educational opportunity for community residents of all ages; interagency cooperation to maximize the use of existing human resources and citizens' involvement in educational decision-making; and WHEREAS, the goal of community education is to promote a sharing, caring, learning community; and WHEREAS, "A Lifetime of Contribution" is the theme of SENIOR CITIZEN CELEBRATION DAY co-sponsored by the High School District 214 community education program and the Village of Mount Prospect to encourage and develop programs and activities to meet the needs of all the citizens in High School District 214 and the Village of Mount Prospect. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim May 1, 1991 as "A Lifetime of I Contribution Day" in Mount Prospect in recognition of the Third Annual SENIOR CITIZEN CELEBRATION DAY. I call upon the residents of High School District 214 as well as all the residents of Mount Prospect to recognize and celebrate the bonds they have discovered, the partnerships they have formed, and the sense of community they have strengthened through community education programs. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Dated this 19th day of March, 1991 Village of Mount Prospector Mount Prospect, Illinois,,,„„ INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: FEBRUARY 26, 1991 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR LIQUOR LICENSE FOR JAPANESE RESTAURANT SHOPPING CENTER - GOLF AND BUSSE Mr. Yoshinori Osaka and his attorney were in my office recently requesting consideration for a Liquor License for the Nina Restaurant. Mr. Osaka presented corporation papers for the Osaka Corporation which are in order. He has also paid the appropriate fees for the License as well as the non-refundable application fee. Mr. Osaka is requesting a Class R Liquor License for restaurant use -consumption at tables only. They are anticipating opening a Japanese Restaurant that will seat approximately 32-35 people with no lounge. The restaurant will have the following hours: 6:00 p.m. -1:00 a.m. seven days a week. At this time, they do not anticipate being open for lunch. They have contemplated that if business picks up, they will be open for lunch only on weekends but that would not be until sometime in the future. Mr. Osaka has not had experience handling liquor nor has he had a Liquor License in the past. He has indicated an interest in attending the liquor servers class at Harper College and has also indicated an interest in meeting with the Police Department to go over handling of liquor patrons. The entire square footage of the facility that Mr. Osaka is contemplating opening is approximately 1500 square feet. He will not be having any separate dining rooms; there will all be tables that will be in an open area in the center of the restaurant. Attached is a sample copy of the menu that Mr. Osaka has dropped off. You will note that the menu is very similar to the menu at Sakura but much more limited in nature. Mr. Osaka and his attorney will be present at the meeting on March 5. They understand it takes two readings for the Ordinance to pass. They are not contemplating opening the restaurant until May but they wish to go through the process to know they will be able to pick up the License in May and close on the lease of the facilities. The zoning and parking stalls in this shopping center are more than adequate to meet with approval for a sitdown restaurant at this location. JFD/rcw JOHN FULTON' 5iX AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by increasing the number of Class "R" liquor licenses by one (1) (Osaka Corporation, d/b/a Nina Restaurant, Golf and Busse Roads), so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows: Section 13.107. Number of Licenses: Two (2) Class A Licenses Two (2) Class B Licenses Ten (10) Class C Licenses One (1) Class D License Two (2) Class E Licenses One (1) Class G License One (1) Class H License One (1) Class M License Two (2) Class P Licenses Eighteen (18) Class R Licenses Nine (9) Class S Licenses One (1) Class T License Eight (8) Class W Licenses SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: PASSED and APPROVED this �t � Village Clerk day of Village President 1991. Class Es ablishment J Numher A Midwest Liquor mrs. P & Mr r 2 B Snuggery Pub, " `e `Olde Town Inn 1 2 C Alvee's Liquors;r, Jrizano Liquors; Domin,ick's (83 & Golf); G l Eagle Liquors; The Liquor Shopper � . Prospect Liquors: Osco Drugs; Phar Mo+Valgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens (Mt 1 " y, specs Plaza) 1 10 D Pkii Prospect MooseD4dge 1 ;, EBristol Court BO, all; Mr, Peter's Banquet Hall ' 2 G Mount Prospect,,/6rk District-Golf Course 1 H Zanie's 1 M Holiday Inn 1 P Arlington Club *erage; Shimada Shoten 1 2 R Artemis; Booll JB Brunetti; Dragon City; Edwardo's; Fell � W1,' Giordano's (Rand Road); ;i 1. Giordano's (E�hrst Road); House of Szechwan,„, laakaya Sankyutle America; Nina�uranaIF Pepe's; Sakura, 15**n Jung; Sunrise; Torishin; f Yasuke 1 18 S E1 Sombrero; E��; Jake's Pizza; Jameson's Char tp se; i ampai; 0 d Orchard- Greenview; Sanj's glace; Second Dynasvr°, Wild Stallions 9 T Thunderbird La 1 W Mr. Beef & Plz„ Pete's Sandwich Palace; 'Rosati's Y' Photo's Hot D i Pizza Hut; Pizza; Sizzler Restaur ` � Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's 8 %' 9 58 TE_Cj DEALER'SCOOK COUNTY. ILLINOISUKAL LIQUOR CONTROL CQMMISbioN RENEWAL DATE NEW r ($150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of tm Liquor License; one-time only fee) Honorable Gerald L. Farley, Village President and Local Liquor Control Commissioner Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois: The undersigned, 1, i'k0 L E . f VZ L t- 10 -r 1 A U � Vo at, � hereby makes application for a Class E- dealer's license for the period ending April 30, 19JL, and tenders the sum of $ -�2 , Mt . C-E) the prescribed fee as set forth in the following: SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13:106): Annual Fee CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00 CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00 CLASS C: Retail package only 2,000.00 CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00 x CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000.00 CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine; limited number of special events to include full service bar facilities; consumption on premises only 00.00 CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00 CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges; retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00 CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non - refrigerated beer and wine only - no consumption on premises 1,750.00 CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,000.00 CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge 2,500.00 CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00 CLASS V: Restail package - wine only 1,500.00 CLASS W Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only and at dining tables only 1,000.00 SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00 EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL. ,a,> Your petitioner, I- A M 9 pt.p ' � � i t o Tl S � A a_ p , doing business as ME EEr r K, 9,8 a°u C 7' , respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at 10 c . —r P kos. Pc -z A , Mount Prospect, Illinois. Description and name of pre' ' s: or til i hro'; 1% �g r N 1 ( escription must beplete as to floor area, 'onta �t`et-c-) i; Is applicant owner of prernis ., / d If not owner, does applicant ` e a lease?State date applicant's lease expires: loa If not owns; attach copy of lease hereto rIF Does applicant have a management contract with another �+ person or entity for the operation or management of licensed premises? O" t If so, state the name and address of the manager or management company. '1"lae manager or management �mpany must complete the same application as the r). Is applicant an individual, coipw-ratio n a co-partnership or an association? (Circle one) 1 If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, teleph�ne number and Social Security Number: iIv r If co-partnership, state name-I, rate of birth, address, telephoje number and Social Security Number of each pers'n, entitled to share in the profitsljthereof: y If a co-partnership, give the d"tee of the formation of the partne'ship: 't/If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: ; If a corporation incorporatedna state other than the J State oIIlinois, indicate date qualified under Illinois Businei/'s Corporation Act to transact bus;/ess in Illinois: i If a corporation, give names, t resses, dates of birth, telepho` numbers and Social Security Numbers of Officers ' Directors. Also, list the narri s, addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Num _;s of shareholders owning m t ' aggregate more thin a� of the stock of such corpoajon. �= OFFICE AND/OR PERCENT OF NAME, T HELD f c L^ o -Ae"�(3f�ov 4 E7C ,.�� AR un.?ov yTl is �O% Date of Birth: 5-I5 -5 S Soc%&Security # 359-48-s'zo8 Phphe # t.137 �2 I Z 6 __ �L V�Lio C l 5 .:gyr �:J �� t�``"�ll-n+ - Cr. ►� 1 A sv d T 1..,,i. - Y9% _ Date of Birth: G - � " Soc all`Security # 3otn _ � �'�SPh"" # 7 i-83 , y J 1 Date of Birth: Social; Security # Phjne # i!�ljYtltllfln7t infnrm n,inn r } � i,..i e.7 ..... .. .,,..... �.,... 9:...:. \ �'..: Objects for which organi7- *;on is formed: ISA M G qE 1: 4 TE gi N c If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? - N 0 If so, explain: If applicant is an individual, state age: Is applicant a citizen of the United States? place of naturalization: Marital status: If a naturalized, citizen, state date and How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously -next prior to the filing of this application? U�� State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time: How long has applicant been in this business? Is the applicant an elected public official? <_)p If so, state the particulars thereof: Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public official? k) 0 In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any political contributions within the past 2 years?., 'n 19 If so, state the particulars thereof: Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? JL0 If so, designate title: Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp? ,A-)0 If so, state the reasons therefor: - Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? 100 If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s): Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premises other than described in this application? AJO If so, state disposition of such application: Is applicant ualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor business? �5' Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal 10 government or by any state or subdivision thereof`7 A -),C> If so, explain: Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? /JO Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the conduct of his/her place of business? Y iF s, Does applicant currently If -Yes,' attach _�am Shop Insurance coverag copy. q, If applicant is n r e e premises, does the owner t4i)reof carry Dram Shop coverage? Insurance cove Ot 0 answer to either of the foreing questions is "No," issue, no license shall Does Surety Pond required rdinance accompany, this application at the time of filing? State name and address of ea re next below: 4? C, Give name, address, date of ki telephone number and Som Security Number of manager or agent in charge o remises for which this appltcati is made: kr OF APPLICANT Corporate Seal (If applicant is corporation) M Who, first being duly swomJ/11i d oath deposes and says is/are the pi er oa at he applicant(s) for the license re ted in the foregoing applicatio that he is/are of p good repute, character and sing and that answers to the j,estions asked in the foregoing application are true correct in every detail. STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK Subscribed and Sworn to befo the this \jkday of A.D., 19 , 0 W11C M ,F OFFICIAL SE ROBERTA C. VVIN`T�- RN NOTARY PUBLIC, STATE OF IL_ OIS MY COMMISS!�N EXPIRES 90.,3192 APPLICATION APPRO V 111 a go of �0 u nt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois 911,0:16199 El TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: MARCH 11, 1991 SUBJECT: CLASS E LIQUOR LICENSE OWNERSHIP CHANGE - MR. PETER'S BANQUETS, 1018 MT. PROSPECT PLAZA Messrs. Alex Lambrou and Paul Velliotis, doing business as Mr. Peter's Banquets, have requested a Liquor License. They intend on purchasing Mr. Peter's Banquets by the end of this month. It is my understanding in discussions with the potential owners that Mr. Lambrou has been in the restaurant business for five years and Mr. Velliotis has been in business for several years including a sitdown restaurant with a liquor license in Berwyn. They intend on operating in the same fashion as Mr. Peter's has operated in the past. They are buying the business and the name and intend on having Mr. Peter work with them for at least a one year period of time. They will be operating from the same menu, however, they have indicated they wish to give a new spruced up took to Mr. Peter's once they have purchased the business. A Class E Liquor License has already been established for Mr. Peters. The number of "E" Licenses will remain the same. JOHN FULTONDIXN JFD/rcw attachment RENEWAL ____ DATE .2119 �91 NEW (WO Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of M Liquor License; one-time only fee) Honorable Gerald L Farley, Village President and Local Liquor Control Commissioner Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois: The undersigned, J A f LIQUop, CopPogq-110w hereby makes application for a Class C liquor dealer's license for the period —ending April 30, 19 9Z , and tenders the sumi of $ 2 oco - 00 the prescribed fee as set forth in the following: SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106): Apnual Fee CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00 CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00 CLASS C: Retail package, only 2,000.00 CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00 organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00 CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000.00 CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine; SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00 EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL. Your petitioner, JAt i CORAIP,4,F/60 doing business as - FP L/ L t 0 004 respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at 17;18 —, Mount Prospect, Illinois. limited number of special events to include full service bar facilities; consumption on premises only 00.00 CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00 CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges; retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00 CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non - refrigerated beer and wine only - no consumption on premises 1,750.00 CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,000.00 CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge 2,500.00 CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00 CLASS V: Restail package - wine only 1,500.00 CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only and at dining tables only 1,000.00 SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00 EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL. Your petitioner, JAt i CORAIP,4,F/60 doing business as - FP L/ L t 0 004 respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at 17;18 —, Mount Prospect, Illinois. L � Description and name of prem es: 17 2g Q. ,L)Er✓l 7-`f` MT. QQosPcc-r siacso e� 2 2"9t. Fr. r~cwe R e, 4, [ 11 (Description must be %iplete as to floor area, ontag�' etc.) Is applicant owner of premises No If not owner, does applicant t'have a lease? YC -5 State date applicant's lease expires: If not aw i ,, attach copy of lease hereto I;RL ; ; Does applicant have a management contract with ,another person or entity for the operation or management of CIIe licensed premises?IN '' If so, state the name and acdrss of the manager or management company. ``The manager or management cpinpany must complete the same application as the (Avner). Is applicant an individual, a cur ration, a co -partnership or an association? (Circle one) If an individual, state your narn%, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number: I/ i If co -partnership, state name, hate of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number of each persop; entitled to share in the profitslibereof: i If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership: RP 'i If a corporation, give state addl date of incorporation I- LI111/61,5 FEQ ./2 . i a. r, If a corporation incorporated,; i a state other than the State of, Illinois, indicate date qualified under Illinois Busine,1s� Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois: ;If If a corporation, give names /,/,;addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social Security Numbers of Officer rand Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of birth and Social Security NurrbeTs of shareholders owning ui thio aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such corporation. OFFICE AND/OR PERCENT OF NAME A AES ST c K HELD T q Pr M. Pel 7 EL Too 5ALEM D,91 VE !!7 E7 ESiAT�S IL - &at Date of Birth: 2.29.47 Social, Security #397 94 -6965 Pb""he # 709- 924-6417 11 Date of BirthSocial' ' Security # Phone # Date of Birth: Social: Security # Phone # (Additional in%rmaticai to be rinluded on a separate listing.) Objects for which organ 'ion is formed: T tswa ojJ o ate Li gWot^ S-feye If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? NO If so, explain: If applicant is an individual, state age: Marital status: Is applicant a citizen of the United States? /%/0 If a naturalized, citizen, state date and place of naturalization: How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to the filing of this application? N ONE' Local address: Telephone no. State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: N F1~ State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time: N/A+ How long has applicant been in this business? N/a NONE Is the applicant an elected public official? /Jo If so, state the particulars thereof: Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public official? NO In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any political contributions within the past 2 years? Nm If so, state the particulars thereof: t4l) i Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? _ No If so, designate title: Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp? If so, state the reasons therefor. plp Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? Plo If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s): Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premises other than described in this application? X17 If so, state disposition of such application: Is applicantqqualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor usi bness? `r�ES Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal government or by any state or subdivision thereof? 1J0 If so, explain: Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? r10 Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the conduct of his/her place of business? yG5 Does applicant currently i copy. If applicant is not the owner Insurance coverage? -p'? no license shall issue.) Does Surety Bond required I filing? State name and address of e2 Give name, address, date of manager or agent in charge c 47 Corporate Seal (If applicant is corporation) Who, first being duly sworr applicant(s) for the license re good repute, character and s foregoing application are true STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF COOK Subscribed and Swom to befc APPLICATION APPROVED: or n Shop Insurance coverage premises, does the owner t] answer to either of the fore Jinance accompany this api surety next below: telephone number and Lises for which this app 2�7- q4 - 69b.} TURE OF APPLICANT S If "Yes," attach carry Dram Shop questions is "No," at the time of Security Number of is made: owvc2 a— 401q4 I L S7,,'," Po L J. SCIN dicSt , at , cf I In -,,., Notar lPu Exp ,e, My 1, 1" Jer oath deposes and says #xat S be is/are the td in the foregoing applicatioO,�; that S he is/are of ig and that answers to the4e stionTasied in the correct in every detaiL this day of otary I lg-ql VI I I age of A o u n t P r o 9 p a c Mo�nt Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: MARCH 11, 1.991 SUBJECT: CLASS C LIQUOR LICENSE OWNERSHIP CHANGE - JAY LIQUOR, 1728 WEST DEMPSTER There has been a request for a new owner at the Liquor Shoppe which is on Dempster Road, a package store, to be purchased by Jaya Patel to operate as Jay Liquor. The liquor store will be operated in the same fashion. The corporation has been formed by Mr. and Mrs. Jaya Patel who reside in Hoffman Estates. They have filed the application fee and all the appropriate insurance documentation and have shown a lease which is to take effect April 1, 1991. There is no record of incidences at the Liquor Shoppe. Mr. Patel has indicated that the new operators will operate the store the same hours and with the same type of stock as in the past. Mr. Patel and his wife will be the main people operating the business. Mr. Patel has operated a business in Mount Prospect in the past as a cleaners at the Central/Main shopping center and sold that cleaners and is now looking for another business to operate in Mount Prospect. Neither spouse has had a Liquor License in their name or worked in a business that had a Liquor License. I encouraged them to contact the Police Department for a short course in liquor handling and sales. JOHN FULTON DIXON JFD/rcw attachment ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS; SECTION ONE: That Subsection C. of Section 13.114 of Chapter 13 of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, be deleted in its entirety and a new paragraph C of Section 13.114 inserted in lieu thereof; so that hereinafter said Section 13.114 C., shall be and read as follows: "C. Notwithstanding any provision of this Chapter 13 to the contrary, it shall be unlawful for a Class C licensee who sells alcoholic liquor as a part of, but not as, its principal business and whose business premises exceed five thousand (5,000) square feet, to consummate the sale of alcoholic liquor except at a counter with a cash register designated to be used for the sale of alcoholic liquor and which cash register is operated by a person of at least nineteen (19) years of age. No more than two (2) cash registers may be designated for the sale of alcoholic beverages and to the extent practicable shall be separated from the remaining cash registers and check- out lines in the establishment. " SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991 Village President ATTEST: Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: 'DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 12, 1991 SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF ORDINANCE #4164 - 215 EAST PROSPECT On April 3, 1990, the Village Board approved Ordinance #4164 Which authorized certain variations for Parenti & Raffaelli at 215 East Prospect. The Ordinance included sideyard and parking variations, and was approved in order to allow an addition to the rear of the building, and a new parking lot. The Ordinance is due to expire soon, and Parenti & Raffaelli are asking for an extension, in order to allow more time to undertake and complete the work. Please see the attached letter. I would recommend extending the Ordinance, so the company will not have to go through the zoning process again to reinstate the variations. DMC:hg PREF I & R4, AELLL LTD. C Vd ARCHITECTURAL WOODWORK, CU!� M, CONTRACT & RESIDENTIAL FUIRNITURE Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60 Attn: David Clements Director of Planning and Zon Dear Sir: We would like to extend frau an April 3, 1990, for at s We want to go ahead wit mic conditions have postpone future. Please consider our req in the past. RP/bn 215 East Prospect Avenue February 13, 1991 variation on our property V"'hich was in effect year if possible. r planned expansion, but to current econo- temporarily, and plan to eed in the near and thank you and your nt for help Si Ronaren4 Secitary/Treasurer Mount Prospect, IL 60056 1 708-2535550 FAX -708-2536055 CAF/ 3/12/91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4164 GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COM QSPECT AVENUE , M ONLY KNOWN AS 215 EA9jT PRO WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did grant variations from certain requirements of Chapter 14 (Zoning ordinance), as requested for property commonly known as 215 East Prospect Avenue, being the subject of ZBA 15-V-90 and legally described as follows: Lots 10 and 17 in A. J. Weber Addition to Mount Prospect, being a subdivision in the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal meridian, in Cook County, Illinois and; WHEREAS, SECTION FOUR of ordinance No. 4164 provides that a permit must be issued and construction begun prior to April 3, 1991; and WHEREAS, it is the intention of the Petitioner to proceed with the improvement as permitted by the variations granted in Ordinance No. 4164; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested an amendment to Ordinance No. 4164 to extend the date of April 3, 1991 one year to April 3, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby amend SECTION FOUR of Ordinance No. 4164 by extending the date to obtain a building permit and begin construction for one additional year, so said variations shall be valid for a period through and including April 3, 1992. SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect- from and after its passage, approval and publication in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount, Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER pC.,, FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 12, 1991 SUBJECT: EXTENSION OF ORDINANCE #4170 - 7 SOUTH EDWARD STREET On April 17, 1990, the Village Board approved Ordinance #4170 which authorized certain variations at 7 South Edward Street. The Ordinance included lot coverage and building separation variations, and was approved to allow a room addition at the rear of the residence. This Ordinance is due to expire soon, and the property owner is asking for an extension, to allow more time for the project. Please see the attached letter. I would recommend extending the Ordinance, so the property owner would not have to go through the zoning process again to reinstate the variations. DMC:hg AUMLIOf Yo"WUM. P.C. ARC HITE C7 URE INTERIOR DESIGN March 7, 1991 800 E NORTHWEST HWY. SU I- E 1 0 4 A MT. P R 0 S;' TCT , I L 6 a 0 5 6 708.253.3761 Mr. David Clements Director of Planning and Village Of Mt. Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mt. Prospect,11. 60056 RE: Youngquist Dear Dave, I am enclosing a copy of drawings are ready for sL realize that in Mt. Prospect application. As we discussed a couple thus have not awarded an selections have been mad in order to keep my optlory do in order to receive this Thank you for your time it Youngquist,A.I.A. k( 011161011 1 11 matter. MAR 8 1991 CAF/ 3/12/9-1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4170 GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 7 SOUTH EDWARD STREET WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did grant variations from certain requirements of Chapter 14 (Zoning ordinance), as requested for property commonly known as 7 South Edward Street, being the subject of ZBA 18-V-90 and legally described as follows: Lot 19 in Block 3 in Busse Is Addition to Mount Prospect in the East 1/2 of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois and; WHEREAS, pursuant to the regulations of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, SECTION FOUR of ordinance No. 4170 provides that a permit must be issued and construction begun prior to April 17, 1991; and WHEREAS, it is'the intention of the Petitioner to construct the room addition as permitted by the variations granted in ordinance No. 4170; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner has requested an amendment to Ordinance No. 4170 to extend the date of April 17, 1991 one year to April 17, 1992. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby amend SECTION FOUR of Ordinance No. 4170 by extending the date for obtaining a building permit and begin construction for one additional year, so said variations shall be valid for a period through and including April 17, 1992. SECTION THREE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1991. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois 00- 0-1 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: GILBERT BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SUBJECT: ZBA 9-V-91, 1624 EAST DOGWOOD LANE DATE: MARCH 12, 1991 In the above captioned case I was r6corded as voting in favor of granting the variations to allow moving the shed from the rear,, yard site to the side yard site, as shown on the attached exhibit,. Even though, after some confusion on my part, the request was fully explained by staff and the Petitioner, I continued to assume, in error, that the vote was to legalize the present location rather than the proposed new side yard location. As a result, I cast a favorable vote when in reality, I was totally opposed to granting the variations. The Petitioner failed to show any hardship whatsoever, in 'My opinion, and his request was opposed by both staff and the next door neighbor whom I felt adequately established the fact that he would suffer harm if these variations were granted. While my vote would not have changed the outcome of this case (5- 1 versus 4-2), 1 did not want to leave the impression that I was in favor of placing sheds in side yards when adequate space is available in the rear yard. on the contrary, in my opinion., a shed should be permitted in.a side yard only when extreme hardship can be shown by the Petitioner without any detriment to his neighbors. , Gilbert Basnik Chairman Zoning Board of Appeals GB/caf VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount'Pr6spect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-9-V-91, TIMOTHY BROWN LOCATION: 1625 EAST DOGWOOD LANE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variance application filed by Timothy Brown. Mr. Brown is requesting the following variations from Section 14.102.13 pertaining to accessory buildings: 1. To allow two accessory buildings on one lot, being an existing storage shed and the recently constructed playhouse. 2. To allow a height of 13 feet for a playhouse rather than the 10 ft. permitted. 3. To allow an 18" sideyard for a storage shed rather than 5 ft., to allow the relocation of an existing storage shed. To allow 1 foot separation between the principal structure and a storage shed rather than 10 ft., with the relocated shed. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991. At the meeting, Mr. Brown presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that he constructed a playhouse on top of a six foot tall platform which raised the overall structure height to 13 feet. He also stated that he would like to relocate an existing storage shed to the east side of his house. In that location, the shed would be 18" from the lot line and I foot from his home. He stated that a fence and existing landscaping would screen the shed from the street. Phil Krawiek, 1627 East Dogwood, expressed concerns about the height of the playhouse. Mr. Krawiek lives next door to Mr. Brown and the playhouse is visible over the fence. Mr. Krawiek was concerned with the safety of the structure and it's untidy appearance. Mr. Brown responded to these concerns stating that the playhouse is not complete. The windows and roof will be properly finished this spring and summer. He also indicated that the playhouse platform was very sturdy and that a security railing was installed around the top. John Fulton Dixon Page 2 March 11, 1991 Julie Farnham, Planner, press Zoning Ordinance does not h therefore be considered like t) Ms. Farnham stated that staffI existing shed. The requested s Staff believes that if the shed i variation. The Zoning Board discussed it lowering the playhouse, and ti that landscaping on the neighb4 considered the variations to S4 1. The variance request to a tie, 3-3 vote. 2. By a vote of 6-0, recorr 3. By a vote of 5-1 recorm an existing shed as p landscaping to be insti 4. By a vote of 5-1, recom, structure and a storage DMC:hg staff concerns with the requ4 wcific standards for playhous storage sheds. -ne major concerns with the pi d and separation from the hot cated, it should he to a locati HIII, ations. Questions were raiso lit.ion of the existing shed. would screen the shed. The 14.102.B separately as folloi a 13 foot tall accessory buil( ads approval of two accessory btp . She noted that the structures which must Js approval of an 18" sideyard W 1'� rsed on the submitted site plan a shown on the site plan. ds approval of a 1 foot separattct J as indicated on the submitted ii I. osed relocation of the are severe variations. that does not require iout the possibility of Zoning Board noted ing Board of Appeals (playhouse) received dings on one lot. allow the relocation of and conditioned on between the principal to plan. i��-S DawnoA �,,, DRavEwRy � VPIvEwAy , /G� 3 ica5 Iba� „� o000 3 Loc ,t 3� � PR -r, o r M FLAY <�w HOUSE a o e, CI45 DO 0_ . �,2 C" .: . Iba �} ,-w.� rrF � i�r<,)a,2 Y �t V4't � ,1fnlcN = ,`to Feed F, 13� r &estae n� b;'4 d- Iia c�G� MA l �,;X- MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE Nn, 9-V-91 Hearing Date: February 28, 1991 PETITIONER: Timothy Brown SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1623 Dogwood PUBLICATION DATE: February 12, 1991 REQUEST: Variations from Section 14.102.3 to accommodate accessory buildings. To allow a 13' height in lieu of 10'. To allow two accessory buildings on one Lot. to allow a 18" sideyard in lieu of 5'. To allow V separation from the principal structure in lieu of 10'. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Phil Krawiek, 1627 Dogwood Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.102.8 to accommodate accessory buildings. To allow a 13' height in lieu of 10'. To allow two accessory buildings or one lot. To allow a 18" sideyard in lieu of 5'. To alloy, 1' separation from the principal structure in lieu of 10'. The petitioner, Timothy Brown of 1i'-17 Dogt.ocd, presented his case stating that he had a playhouse and obtained a permit from the Village. Mr. 11i—)wn stated that the playhouse will be removed when !is children outgrow using it. Mr. Brown also stated that the request for the sideyard variation is for an existing shed that he would like to relocate to his sideyard to have more room in his rear yard. Julie Farnham, Planner for the \illage of Mount Prospect, stated that the petitioners request is to accommodate two accessory buildings, a storage shed and a playhouse. Miss Farnham stated that the playhouse is on a 6' platform resulting in the overall 13' height. She also stated that playhouse is partiallyAby trees, but is visible over fence,.— screevxej Miss Farnham stated safety railings beir olatform. She statec io rel(,,rcating the e!, and separation varix believes that if the location that, doesh' Phil Krawiek of 1621A variation requests, without approval ane since July 1990. Mr, about the safety of conforming and well Mr. Brown stated the railing has been ins permitted by Code. ' Mr. Brown then pre., rear yard in the wi� Mrs. S14cowron questi4 knowing about the 13' petitioner did not : he obtained the peri structures do not r,4 must submit a sketel location on the lot The Board then gene: Basnik questioned i petitioner stated t structure to do the Chairman Basnik the petitioners request of 10' feet. Mr. Lannon moved. M UPON ROLL CALL: A NA Motion resulted by Chairman Basnik th petitioners reques lot. ZB Fe t approval 4 should b( ut around the top of I at staff has some con( ing storage shed. The s requested are extrer ed is to be moved it i equire variances. gwood, stated that he !ing that the structuri has been complaining awiek also stated tha, structure and feels r 120 square feet. he structure is safe led. It,is 98 sq. ft. he summer it is scree ed a picture of the p season without leave how a,permit was iss ,ge shed? Mr. Clement cate the'shed on the Permits for relative re a survey. However the proposed structu y discussed the propo e platform,,could be 1 he would have to demo tertained 4 motion to allow a 13' height st ratt seconded. annon, Pratt, Brother rettrager, Skowron, B to of 3-3. tertained a motion to allow two accessory -V-91 ary 28, 1991 2 of 3 ndition on playhouse s with regard eyard setback Staff ld be to eases the ere completed the Village is concerned s non - the safety ich is by the trees. ouse from his the trees. without ated that the ication when dnor applicant ,nd its — Chairman -red by 3'. The .,h the entire �ant the sure in lieu Kik rant the 11dings on one ZBA-9-V-91 February 28, 1991 Page 3 of 3 Mr. Lannon moved. Mrs. Skowron seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request to allow a 18" sideyard in lieu of 5' to relocate a storage shed as shown on submitted site plan. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mrs. Brothers seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: Brothers Motion carried by a vote of 5-1. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request to allow a I foot separation from the principal structure in lieu of 10', with a condition of shrubbery to screen it visually from the street. Mrs. Skowron moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: Brothers Motion carried by a vote of 5-1. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARMIM Mount P6spect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN %WL— FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-9-V-91 APPLICANT: TIMOTHY BROWN ADDRESS: 1625 EAST DOGWOOD LANE LOCATION MAP: -7— WA PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. ZONING: R -I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZE: 75' X 120' = 9,000 sq. ft. % COVERAGE: 36.3% FA.R.: N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning BoardT"o Appeals Page 2 REQUEST The applicant is seeking the iowing variations to Section 14.'102.8 to accommodate accessory buildings: 1. To allow a 13 foot height yin lieu of 10 feet. r 2. To allow two accessory ;buildings on one lot. 3. To allow a 18" sideyard;�' i lieu of 5 feet. 4. To allow 1 foot separation from the principal structure in lieu of 10 feet. DI AaarVTVrw x.Vn 7`nhINC t- UMRNT9 AND CONCERN,S Summary of application. ' e applicant is seeking a height vac" tion for a playhouse constructed on a platform in tl>er ear yard of 1625 East Dogwood ane. The playhouse is considered an accessory buildu%g and must therefore be constructed according to the standards for typical storage shjeds. The applicant obtained a pernut� for the playhouse. However, because it was constructed on top of a six foot high platforthe overall height of the structure: is 13 feet. The Zoning il Ordinance permits a maximum]*ight of 10 feet. Concurrently, the applicant is proposing to relocate an existing she'd to the sideyard east of the house. In this location, the sed would be 1 foot from the houseand18" from the east lot line. Vil Surrounding Area 17evelopmei aid Potential Impact: 'There are a o accessory structures on this lot. One is a typical 1l» 12' storage shed and the other la playhouse. Only one accessory building, in additiori' t# a garage, is allowed on a lot. The playhouse is not a typical storage shed but it is au;pkcessory structure and therefore, must meet the standards designed for sheds. The applit states that the playhouse will �e, removed in 5-7 years when the children grow out of W i Staff has no objections to allowing the playhouse as a second accessory building on tbi lot. The applicant states that the p'11, ouse was constructed on top ofthe, platform to allow free space for ground play unde Staff has no major objections ,to the playhouse on the platform but notes that it is from adjacent properties over tje top of fences. Mature trees screen it from some vant points. Staff does suggest that searity railing be installed around the above -grade plat fa}gj area. Staff has some concerns about the proposal to relocate the exisii g storage shed to the sideyard. While Mr. Brown indicates that landscaping and a fencelwill be provided in front of the shed, it will be closer to,46d therefore more visible from the street. Staff notes that there are no widows on the ground floors of the homes adjacent to the proposed shed location. There are also matyxe'� evergreen trees on the neighbos,property which would effectively screen the shed fron►rthe adjacent neighbor. In the proosed location the shed would be 14 feet from the nei bon's house. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 Another concern with the proposed relocation is that it essentially blocks access to the rear yard from the east side of the house. It would be impossible for emergency equipment to utilize this sideyard without removing the shed. While emergency access to the rear yard could be obtained through the west side yard, staff cannot support blocking any potential emergency access routes so severely. Staff notes that the current location of the shed also reduces access to the rear yard. However, the proposed location would increase the degree of non -conformity. Staff suggests that if the shed is relocated at all, it should be moved to a location that does not require variances. OTHER VILLAGE STAELCOMMEM The Inspection Services Department requires that sheds be fireproofed with 5/8" Class X drywall where located less than 10 feet from the principal structure. Engineering notes that, if the shed is relocated to the sideyard, the downspouts should be redirected toward the front or back yard. SUM RYIREC!Q V MMATIO Staff has no objection to allowing the playhouse as a second accessory building on this lot. The playhouse is not a typical accessory building and staff has no objection to the height variance requested, provided proper security railing is installed around the top of the elevated platform. The location of the playhouse meets all setback requirements and lot coverage is below the maximum allowed. Staff does not support the setback variances created by relocating the storage shed to the east sideyard. The variances are extreme (70% sideyard; 90% separation) and could negatively effect emergency access around the house. Staff suggests that if the shed is moved at all, it should decrease, not increase its existing non -conforming status. DMC:bg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WVC_ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-10-V-91, PATRICIA LANGOS LOCATION: 1715 ROBBIE LANE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation for a variance application filed by Patricia Langos. The applicant is requesting a variance to Section 14,3016A3 to allow a driveway width of 28'-10" to accommodate an adjacent patio at 1715 Robbie Lane. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991. At the meeting, Larry Ellington, representing the petitioner, explained that the existing driveway and patio were replaced. A permit was received for the driveway but the property owner didn't know that the adjacent patio was considered part of the driveway. The variance is requested to allow the driveway and patio to remain as reconstructed. Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the Zoning Ordinance requires sidewalks and patios adjacent to driveways to be included in the overall driveway width. She noted that the driveway and patio were reconstructed the same size as previously existed and that lot coverage would not be increased. She also stated that the lot coverage is currently at the allowed maximum and any additional structures placed on the lot would need a variance. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. By a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board recommends approval of the variance request to allow a 28'-10" wide driveway which includes an adjacent patio at 1715 Robbie Lane conditioned on: -No additional structures shall be built on this lot. DMC:hg 0 Nei H 6a? PA ;JAN `` :. l� 'J 1 Ab lcl 2¢' n 210 AOR MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 10-V-91 Hearing Date: February 28, 1991 PETITIONER: Patricia Langos SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT ABSENT: 1715 Robbie Lane February 12, 1.991 V, -).reit: tion from Section �4,'1016.A.3 to allow a i,:,j d t 1-: of 28'-10" at its Taidest po; rl t . t T1,,i F, n k, C h a. i r m a Y i i,.annon Ric+,ird Pratt L,Y s Prr)thers R E"',rJ,ttrager Showron Ronsa1(3 ('F'issidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this ease stating that the petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14. 3016.A.3 to allow a driveway wicitli of 28'-10" at its widest point. A maximum driveway width oF 21' is permitted by Cor? Thepetitioner, Larry Ellington -' 603 S. Roosevelt, Arlington Heights, TL, the nephro, <)f the petitioner, stated that his aunt received a permit I,) reconstruct the and reconstructed the patio al,;,, lh.i' rlidn't realize the pa' had to be included. Mr. Ellin —t t:0 -d that his aunt replaced exactly what was ther- Julie Farnham, Planner for the �''!!1�gof Mount Prospect, stated that the total driveway romes to 28'-10" :hitt; includes the patio. Miss Farnh,ir� -;'atoll that they reconstructed exactly what was before, noting that lot coverage is notbeing incr—i,—'. Tn addition, there is 5-7 foot green strip to captu-,— -in:, run-off and a fence t,; screen the patio from the neig},.h.— Chairman Basnik then entertain -d :k motion to grant the petitioners request for a variation from Section 14.3016.\ to allow a driveway width of 28'—n- ,, its widest point. Mrs. Brothers moved. Mrs. Skoi,!-,,ri UPON ROLL CALL: Motion carried b This case must S nnon, Pratt, Bi owron, Basnik ne of 6-0. heard before t ,Mich,e Ile 1991 r VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNK CHAIRMAN wt--- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-10-V-91 APPLICANT: PATRICIA LANGOS ADDRESS: 1715 ROBBIE LANE LOCATION MAP: K X— LEE-- 9 7 RT -- Dv :77 T"�w WX 77' PEI T- R X - f7 RX RI PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: R-1 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL LOT SIZE: 75'x 133'-9k" = 10,034.25 sq. ft. % COVERAGE: 44.9% F.A.R. : N.A. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Boa4'0 Appeals Page 2 0 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a *Once to Section 14.3016.A-3 to aflow a driveway width of 28'-10" at it's widest point. A1,100mmurn driveway width of 21 feet is permitted by Code. Summary of application, Thiapplicant obtained a permit to reconstruct a 21 foot wide J driveway. An existing adjace *' Patio was also reconstructed at that time which, according to the Mount Prospect Zonir4"00rdinance, must be included in the overall width of the driveway. The applicant was not aware of this requirement and therefore, did not indicate the patio reconstruction on the driveway"! ,,permit. The variance is requeste&6 allow the driveway and patio to remain as reconstrua�di Surroundings rea Developmei#4nd Potential Impact: The applicant states that the original driveway and patio had beco",*, cracked and sunk toward the house foundation causing drainage problems. The drive*�'ai and patio were reconstructed the same size as previously existed. While lot coverage is being increased, at 44.9% it is essentially at the maximum ' coverage allowed by Code. M12" Iuc h, any additional strictures or pavement placed on this lot would require a variance to the lot coverage requirements. The applicant's detached gaT4gE is located partially behind the house. As a result, the driveway flares out behind thelbuse to meet the garage. Staff observed several homes in T the neighborhood with similarflared driveways. The area between the drivew* *and the house was paved to create a patio and sidewalk leading to a door beside the o�'*, tead garage door. The Zoning Qrdinance requires patios and sidewalks adjacent to drays ,, "ays to be included in the overall, driveway width because they could be used for parking this situation, because of the position of the patio behind the house, it would be difficuiV tpark a full O -sized vehicle on the'patio without blocking the driveway. A landscaped area 5-7 feet wade exists between the driveway and the adjacent lot to the g "j, east.. This should provide ample drainage area for any run-off from the driveway. A 4-5 foot wood fence exists along tfie'Jot line, extending from the front building line back to the garage. The fence effectivell" ,y ,,screens the driveway and patio area from the adjacent property. rU No major objections were reconstruction has not cai The reconstructed driveway lot coverage was not increase that any additional structures I)MC:hg other Village staff. drainage problems. o replaced previously e) has no objections to the on this lot will require a ng notes that the driveway �ng pavement and that the iition requested but notes iation to the lot coverage. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount. Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER %�, FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-6-Z-91, ZBA-11.V-91, GLADSTONE NORWOOD TRUST COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CHANGE/DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION LOCATION: 412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a rezoning and variation request filed by Gladstone Norwood Trust (Vince Manglardi - beneficiary). The applicant is requesting: 1. . Rezoning of 412 and 414 East Rand Road from R-1 Single Family Residence to B- 2 Business Office to allow construction of an office building. 2. Variation to Section 14.3012.13 to waive the one required 12' x 35' loading space. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991. At the meeting, Mr. Manglardi explained that he is proposing to construct a two-story office building on the property. Likely tenants would include real estate related businesses such as, realtors, surveyors, and lawyers offices. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained that the proposed B-2 zoning is quite restrictive, essentially allowing only office uses. The adjacent funeral home to the north is also zoned B-2 so a larger, unified zoning district would be created by the proposed rezoning. He also indicated that B-2 zoning would be more desirable than higher intensity commercial/retail uses adjacent to residential development. He further noted that the Plan Commission recently approved the subdivision and a change in the Comprehensive Plan from Single Family Residential to General Commercial -Office. The Plan Commission also approved a Development Code modification to defer street light installation by requiring a restrictive covenant. Mr. Clements noted that the site plan is conceptual but demonstrates that an office building and required parking can be developed without variations. Landscaping and berming will be provided to screen the development from the residences. Specific detail design of the building and storm water management would be required for the permit review process. Mr. Clements stated that staff supports B-2 zoning for this property and has no objection to waiving the loading space requirement. John Fulton Dixon Page 2 'o March 11, 1991 Marcia Kurchodina, 518 East F60 Street, discussed several concerns..raised by neighborhood residents and listed on a hand a While they were not opposed to B-2 zoning in general, they were concerned about im � ased traffic in the neighborhood and other potential environment issues, such as, fl aesthetics and noise. She presented an alternative site plan illustrating the driveway opeung directly onto Rand Road rather than on Hill Street. Jim Bushemi, 504 Eastman Court, expressed similar concerns noting that the landscaped berm between the developmer t,�iand the residents is very import of to ensure aesthetic quality. He also stated that h � lieves the main objection to the proposed plan is having the driveway off Hill Street. John Dourghty, 520 Hill Street o expressed concerns about traffic congestion during rush hour if the driveway opens ons Hill Street. Bill Kurchodina, 518 East HiIl Sheet, summarized that they were not opposed to an office development but were concerned; about safety. The Zoning Board discussed ibrequest and the alternative site plan presented by the neighbors. They questioned wher I.D.O.T. would approve another opening onto Rand Road. Some general discussio nsued about the loading space variation request. After further discussion, the`° g Board of Appeals voted 6-0 to approve the rezoning of 41.2 and 414 East Rand Road om 'R -I Single Family Residence. to B-2 Business Office. 1% By a separate vote of 5-1, the 2,$ g Board of Appeals recommends approval of a variance to Section 14.3012.B to waive required loading space. DMC:hg '% y i EVERGREEN, HEDGING a GROUND COVER -FOUNDATION PLANTING AROUND BUILDING SHADE TREES 40' ON CENTER i � � ��r 236.02 S00 a*} iifat 0- NOTE' FINAL PLANTING SELECTION BY. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT O SHADE TREES TO BE 21/2" MIN. CALIPER. - 1 1 J o SOD ' 11 f—PROPOSED 2 STORY BRICK OFFICE BUILDING -1 14,500 TOTAL L SQ. FT. ' saa�- — ORNAMENTAL TREE SURROUNDED BY CLUSTER OF SHRUBS TYPICAL FOR 11 65.00' 65.00' PROPOSED ASPHALT PARKING LOT; 21,525 SQ. FT (SEE ATTACHE PLAN) t0 ' 1 - PROPOSED DRIVE �� HILL STREET SHADE TREES AND HEDGES SITE PLAN PROPOSED OFFICE BLDG. N SCALE, 1"- 50' 0* p I ; — SHADE TREES 4? WITH ORNAMEW sHRuss_: • rn 3•r 37 16' X 10' CONCRETE PAD -REFUSE CONTAINERS WJCOVER PLANTINGS 0 tj « HDCP. CENTER 24 ISLAND W! PLANT'GS IHDCR 1(- n 1'6 N 20 t+ ,,, , '; _ BUIL DING 7 ... {j L 2j �� I �Z ?fi,4 1 24' o .t N_ 24' r t 2' -O' -OVERHANG i ) 0 o M 30`-0` SET CK ROW 147'-0" 20'-d' PARKING LOT PLAN SCALE- 1"-30!-0' dop, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 6-Z-91 Hearing Date: February 28, 1991 11-V-91 PETITIONER: Gladstone Norwood Trust SUBJECT PROPERTY: 412 and 414 East Rand Road PUBLICATION DATE: February 12, 1991 REQUEST: Rezoning from R-1 Single -Family Residence to B-2 Business Office to allow construction of an office building. Also variation from Section 14.3012.E to waive the requirement to provide one 12' x 35' loading space. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Marcia and Bill Kurczodina, Jim Bushemi, John Daughtery all residents of Hill Street. Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting to rezone the property at 412 and 414 East Rand Road from R-1 Single Family Residence to B-2 Business office to allow construction of an office building. The applicant is also requesting a variance from Section 14.3012.E to waive the requirement to provide one 12' x 35' loading space. The petitioner, Vincent Manglardi of 1405 S. Busse Road, stated that he is a beneficiary of the trust, presented the case stating that they are proposing to construct a 14,500 square foot, two-story office building at the site which currently is the Spear's Nursery. Mr. Manglardi also stated that they requesting a waiver of the loading space requirement because deliveries will likely be made via UPS or similar service. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the B-2 office use is a desirable use and an attractive office building would provide better entrance to the neighborhood than the existing. Mr. Clements stated that staff asked the pe all setback requir The petitioner pre requirements. Mr. -Family residences, the 20 ft. landsca proposed. building that the Plan Comm subdivision. They plan to allow offi. office building is t,ill provide a cnm deveInpmPrit. Mr. Lannon questi Clements stated t a small building. Marcia Kurczodina, main concerns are off Hill Street. M the corner more da with water and flo proposed parking I proposed site -plan architectural engi off Rand Road, Mrs this would be more themselves by not St. and Rand Road. cuts on Rand Road that there is a co conditioning heati Jim Bushemi, 504 parking lot drai John Daughtery 520 traffic build up 0 Bill Kurczodina 51 opposed to the off specifically on th Chairman Basnik qu. rezoning of the pr opposed to the pro Mr. Clements stat ones for a site plan w is and the landscape o ed a site plan which m ments noted that there the East of the proper setback will properly the neighborhood. Mr on reviewed and approv approved a change to se. Staff believes #A* appropriate use in thi ble neighbor to reside the loading dock vari his is an appropriate 518 E. Hill Street, s fic and safety and th Kurczodina feels that ous. Mrs. Kurczodina g problems and the li Mrs. Kurczodina then wn tip by a neighbor w . The plan shows the rczodina stated that ,eficial to the office ing more traffic on t s would also reduce t 3 to 1. Mrs. Kurczo ,n regarding t ' he scree Gnits and drainage fro n Court, stated his 1 St., stated his CIO 11 Street and the ura Hill St., stated tha building but do have iveway location off Hi oned if anyone is Opp ty. Mr. Eiarczodina st d office use. at when the building -Z-91 1-V-91 ary 28, 1991 2 of 3 4 would meet nance code. s all Single and feels that een the lements stated the proposed comprehentive this small ocation and al . Mr. est for such d that the iveway being s will make is concerned ng of the ented a s a veway access neighbors feel Iding: and orner of Hill umber of curb also stated of the air - e parking lot. erns on the s, on the nd flooding, ey are not erns t.. to the they were not ROLM ZBA-6-Z-91. ZBA-11-V-91 February 28, 1991 Page 3 of 3 submitted he will invite Mrs. Kurczodina to look them over. He also stated that he feels T.D.O.T. will not be in favor of a driveway on Rand Road for a small office building if another access point is available. The Board then generally discussed the request and had no objections. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request to rezone the properties from R -I Single - Family Residential to B-2 Business Office to allow Construction of an office building. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Pratt seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners variation request to waive the one required 12' N 35' loading space. Mrs. Brothers moved, Mr. Brettrager seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Brettrager, Skowron NAYS: Basnik motion carried by a vote of 5-1. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary ; ;)r i . iA ID4 0 - I )- ?—y0;iPX' to ..$ 0, FEBRUARY 20, 1991 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Mcunt Prospect plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Velasco at 8:00 P.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. 00LOUK0140, Present upon Roll Call: Frank Boege . Frank Breitsameter Lynn Kloster Elizabeth Luxem Tom McGovern William Navigato Louis Velasco, Chairman Absent: Tom Borrelli Village Staff Present: M'-chael Sims, Staff Planner Press Staff Present: larry Smith, Diily Herald Jo Nelle Robinson, Mt. Prospect Journal APPROVAL OF MINUTES Mrs. Luxem moved, seconded by Mr. Boege, that the minutes of February 6, 1991 be approved as submitted. All members voted Aye and Chairman Velasco declared the minutes approved. cli Final Plat of Wal-Mart Subdivision t 930 East Mount Pros Plaza Mr. Sims reported that the linen for this subdivision was not ready and asked that it be continued. Chairman Velaxco agreed to continue it to the next meeting. F-w-mg,JL . Of This case involved a Comprehensive Plan hearing from single family residential to general commercial/office, a Subdivision into a single family lot of record, and a Development Code modification. Chairman Velasco opened the public hearing at 8:03 P.M. The applicant, Mr. Vince Manglardi and Mr. Dan Cafaro, the present owner of the property involved in the petition were present. MAN CWMISSION MWTES MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, 1 The property involved inc: the applicant was request: Family Residential to Geni request for change in the sistent with the general'I Land -Use Plan. Concerns raised by Plan 0 would have on the single east side and possible sa without street lights. Mr berm and landscapping at problems for the resident Mr. Sims commented that t which is less than the 30 Comment was made that lig problem. Mr. Manglardi st property after dark beca-o Mr. Velasco closed the Motion was made by Mr. I request to change the 0 Subdivision from Single be approved. The vote v that he voted against t:, without lighting would, Mr. Kloster moved, sec Rosen Subdivision be a to sign the linen. The Mr. McGovern moved, seco, modification to permit a Rand Road until requeste Prospect and contingent anteeing the installatio 6 Ayes; 1 Pass. Motion p A. Comnunity Development B. Comprehensive Plan: C. Development Code: D. Text Amendment: in it, two single family Ccmprehensive Plan change Coovercial/Office. Staff h rehenSiVe Plan and believe ,ipals of the Plan and the sion members were the effo y homes adjacent to the pi problems on the south side glardi stated that there i ear of the property to al: .rea on the east. Concernii t, along Hill Street is on t calling for lighting by ran the parking lot shoul, there would be little or a offices would be closed hearing at 8:09 P.M. meter and seconded by Mrs nsive Plan for Lots 1 & 2 Residential to General C e; 1 Nay. Motion passed.1 on because he felt the in hazards. Mr. Navigato, that the and the Chairman and So s 6 Aye; I Nay. Motion by Mrs. Luxem# to approve ,y in the installation of the State of Illinois or a owner signing a restric street lights when reques I. report report report report for which S -Ingle viewed the was con- nt general change ,y on the Street) be earthen 'e noise lighting, feet deep tge code. .wiate the tffic to the ardi and y bei authorized velopment Code t lighting on ge of Mount covenant guar - The vote was PIAN CaIMISSION MIMJTES PAGE 3 MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, 1991 NEW BUSINESS Mr. Sims reported on the progress of the Block Grant funding proposals for FY 91 and stated that Mr. Clements would attend the Finance Comm- ission meeting the following evening for review of the proposals. AWOURNMENr There being no further business, Chairman Velasco adjourned the meeting at 8:90. P.M. Respectfully submitted Lynn M. Kloster VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN w___ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-6-Z41, ZBA-11-V.91 APPLICANT: GLADSTONE NORWOOD TRUST (DAN COFFARO, SR.) ADDRESS: 412 AND 414 EAST RAND ROAD LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: LOT SIZE: % COVERAGE: FA.R.: q ?771 f7 - R X R-1 (Requesting rezoning to B-2 Business Office) 52,693 sq. ft. 69.4% N/A E L PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: LOT SIZE: % COVERAGE: FA.R.: q ?771 f7 - R X R-1 (Requesting rezoning to B-2 Business Office) 52,693 sq. ft. 69.4% N/A A A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Boar4 Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesting to ^Dne 412 and 414 East Rand Road from R-1 Single Family Residence to 13-2 Business 014 ito allow coristruction of an office building. The applicant is also requesting a variance to," Section 14.3012.13 to waive the requirement to provide one 12' x 35' loading space. Summary of application: Thel "' li t pp can is proposing to construct a 14,500 square foot, two- story office building at 412 ifid,1414 Rand Road. Proposed tenants include real estate related businesses, such as, r6 altors, attorneys and surveyors. The property is currently zoned R-1 Single Family and 1i refore, must be rezoned to allow the proposed use. The applicant is also request deliveries will likely be made Surrounding Area Developn originally intended to devel( family lots to serve as a buff consideration revealed that develop an office and assoc property for residential use Rand Road. Consequently, property for a professional i Rez(2ning Reques Mal Hill W" WON 9 nature. such as restaurants a The Comprehensive Plan in is appropriate in this are alo attempts to consolidate uses used to buffer and visually ii development. The eastern part of this lot is Plan. The applicant is concur office use. In addition, the lc iteins were reviewed by the I Funeral Home which is local B-2. It is an island of comm, proposed rezoning would be consolidated area of B-2 zor a waiver of the loading space requirement stating that UPS or similar service. [nd Potential Impact: The property owner, Mr. Coffaro, - front of this lot with an office use and create two single the existing residential development to the east. Further ont half of the lot alone was not large enough to feasibly parking. Mr. Coffaro did not feel developing the entire desirable given the cominercialTential of frontage on .mrrent proposal was developed which utilizes the entire building. -s that a mix of residential and commercial development and Road. It encourages coordinated development which zoning. It also states that landscaped screening should be rte new commercial development with existing residential gnated for residential development in the Comprehensive ly requesting a change in the Comprehensive Plan to allow )eing resubdivided to create one new lot of record. These Commission on February 20, 1991. Staff notes that Matz �n the adjacent property north along Rand Road is zoned fly zoned property within a large, residential district. The [stent with the funeral home, It would also create a larger, along Rand Road. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 Office development is appropriate along Rand Road and more desirable than higher intensity commercial/retail uses adjacent to residential development. Office uses tend to generate traffic at typical rush hours in the morning and afternoon, with sporadic traffic during the rest of the day. Commercial/retail uses on the other hand, typically generate a more steady flow of traffic with a significant amount during evening hours. Staff believes that an attractive, well -landscaped office development plan can provide a good buffer or transition between residential development and more intensive commercial development. Site Plan Demd2tio The proposed site plan includes a two-story (14,500 sq. ft.) office building and associated parking for 58 cars. The exterior of the office building is proposed to be of brick and glass construction. It was located at the front of the lot to take advantage of visibility along Rand Road. In addition, the applicant wanted the two-story building to be as far from the residents as possible to minimize its impact. The entrance to the parking is off Hill Street and therefore won't increase the number of curb cuts on Rand Road. The entrance was set back from the intersection to allow stacking for 5-6 cars without blocking ingress and egress to the parking lot. Because there are no through streets in this neighborhood, existing traffic patterns should not be greatly impacted by this development. However, an office development will increase traffic at this intersection, particularly during rush hours. All the required setbacks have been met for both the building and the parking lot. A 20 foot green area along the east property line will be landscaped to provide 100% screening of the parking lot adjacent to the residents. Staff suggests that berms be installed in this area to improve the appearance and increase the screening potential. Berms may also help buffer noise from the parking lot. Lighting of the parking lot cannot "spill over" onto adjacent properties. Staff suggests that lighting be kept to the minimum acceptable level and that light fixtures be placed as far from the residents as possible. Parking lot screening and interior landscaping, and foundation plantings around the building are also proposed. The landscaping indicated on the site plan meets the general requirements of the Landscape Ordinance. However, a landscape plan indicating specific plant names must be submitted for review by staff, along with other required building plans. Request tQ Wah& Loading Spao Requirementl The applicant is requesting to waive the requirement to provide one 12' x 35' loading space. The applicant believes that deliveries for likely tenants would be via UPS or similar small truck/van vehicles. As such, a loading space to accommodate a semi -trailer would not be necessary. Staff agrees with this rationale noting that many professional office uses do not have large truck delivery needs. However, staff suggests some modifications be made to the parking layout to ensure that the access to the door is clear and not used for vehicle parking. This would benefit delivery personnel as well as employees and customers. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning 1. Public Works notes t] also request that the curb. 2. Inspection Senices s on Rand Road. 3. Police Department sl studied to determine Prevention Bureau. 4. Engineering and bui must be included in 6efieves that this developm, currently contains several ffuw", 0*14 wiUVC-M& Staff supports the requests tj ire-,nerrtq o 1. Specific landscape pla 2. Building exterior shal 3. Roof -top mechanical NEW Appeals ke by other departments: Page 4 that consideration be given to adding a right turn lane ts, that the traffic patterns in thow be carefully �iborhood impact This should r.reviewed by the Crime plans must be submitted for review. Detention facilities agineering plans. ON lopment is appropriate in this location along Rand Ron.l. stent with the goals of the Comprehensive Plan and wo tome. This is a sensitive site being located so close iportant that attractive landscapi4g, be provided to ensu.-, 3d the office development into,tbq' residential area. The all setbacks and screening requirements will be met. Staff will greatly improve the appearance of this site which H old buildings. Consequently the entrance to the attractive. one this property to B-2 Business Office and to waive the litioned on: oust be submitted for staff review and approval. of brick and glass materials. Inment shall be screened. 10 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-12-V-91, LINCOLN STREET PARTNERS (NICK PAPANICHOLAS, RIC DIESCHBOURG) LOCATION: 230-240 EAST LINCOLN STREET The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a variance application filed by Lincoln Street Partners, (Nick Papanicholas and Rick Dieschbourg). The applicant is requesting the following variations to accommodate construction of an industrial building and on-site parking at 230-240 East Lincoln Street: 1. Section 14.2202.E to allow 5 foot parking lot setbacks along interior lot lines rather than 10 ft.; and to allow a 15 foot front parking lot setback rather than 30 feet. 2. Section 14.3012.E to waive the required one 12' x 50' loading space. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991. At the meeting, David Wolf, Architect, described the proposed 13,340 square foot building. He stated that the lot is narrower and smaller than current standards for 1-1 lots. As a result, the setback variations are needed. Richard Dieschbourg, Vice President of Lincoln Street Partners, also presented testimony in support of the project. He indicated that Nicholas and Associates, a building contractor firm, would eventually occupy 50%-60% of the building space. Other tenants would also likely be building contractors or related businesses. Julie Farnham, Planner, noted that this lot is an existing non -conforming 1-1 lot which would be difficult to develop without some variations. She stated that the parking lot setbacks requested were similar to setbacks granted for Parenti & Raffaelli last year on the adjacent lot. She also noted that all other Code requirements including, building setbacks and lot coverage, have been met. With regard to the loading space requirement, Ms. Farnham indicated that four overhead doors on the west side of the building would provide adequate service vehicle access to the warehouse areas. These doors would be sufficient for loading for the small individual units. John Fulton Dixon Page 2 March 11, 1991 The Zoning Board of lot and similar develo Accordingly, by a 6-0 following variations fol Street. 1. Section 14.2 ft. front parkin, 2. Section 14.2, DMC:hg the request noting that this mounding lots. a small industrial Board of Appeals recommends approval of the office/warehouse building at 230-240 East Lincoln i parking lot setbacks on inferior lot lines and a 15 - required loading space. JAMES M. ELLMAN oR um. somula w pw w 1w ul w lu I=flw t2l �xprata Al mom. a. %.m 11. RUT w mu"o MMIM.0"Um. a as . ... . ...... . ..... —41- /'00.00 4.OZ Fr 7c7rA.L Suff-01�4 AZE& lz"." Z'T-M IOT&L P&2ww4 &ZELA mrW—PCrwM^ Ax"'5 41S I -F —ag". ePAZ > to, ..Q. �breL lb'.It%.4 —.4— A" 3.' -AX, PA"1�4 9rlQ.=a.-"* —7050 'ov, "'m Fezr u4 ear. xreAc+ca "njA, e1.4 AerC 4 ==C e 10-- 950 7%JZU 940 Sr sure OF at'001#1 covory a# "at i "ags a 4%LY 4 Won I ;w -12-V0.9 O fiM� 1a 4.OZ Fr 7c7rA.L Suff-01�4 AZE& lz"." Z'T-M IOT&L P&2ww4 &ZELA mrW—PCrwM^ Ax"'5 41S I -F —ag". ePAZ > to, ..Q. �breL lb'.It%.4 —.4— A" 3.' -AX, PA"1�4 9rlQ.=a.-"* —7050 'ov, "'m Fezr u4 ear. xreAc+ca "njA, e1.4 AerC 4 ==C e 10-- 950 7%JZU 940 Sr sure OF at'001#1 covory a# "at i "ags a 4%LY 4 Won I ;w -12-V0.9 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 12-V-91 Hearing Date: February 28, 1991 PETITIONER: Lincoln Street Partners SUBJECT PROPERTY: 230-240 East Lincoln Street PUBLICATION DATE: February 12, 1991 REQUEST: Variations from Section 14.2202.E to allow 5' parking lot setbacks along interior lot lines rather than 10' and 15' front parking lot setback rather than 30' as required by Code. Section 14,3012.E to waive the required one 12' x 50' loading space. MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.2202.E to allow 5' parking lot setbacks along interior lot lines rather than 10' and 15' front parking lot ' setback rather thAn 301 as requested by Code. Also, a variation request from Section 14.3012.E to waive the required one 12' x 50' loading space. The petitioner, Richard Dieschbourg of 309 S. Pine St. and David Wolf, architect for Nicholas and Assc., presented the'17 case stating that the proposed building will be the main office and warehouse for Nicholas and Assc. a building contractor firm. Nicholas and associates will initially- occupy nitiallyoccupy 40% of the building and potentially 50%-60% . They will lease out the remaining offices. Mr. Wolf stated that the building will consist of 4-6 office/warehouse spaces. Mr. Wolf stated that the property is currently zone,? I-1 and is surrounded by three industrial lots. Mr. Wolf stated that the front parking lot variation requested will uniform with other existing industrial buildings on Lincoln such as Parenti and Rdffelli. Mr. Wolf stated that four overhead doors are warehouse portions a loading dock, Mr from the Village st on all four buildin mechanical equipmen plan. Julie Farnham, Plan stated that this is is 140' wide making variations. Miss Fa are very similar to which were approved attempt was made to approved plan for P continued, stating lane access around ftalt staff have no Mr, Lannnn question in. Mr. Dieschbourg general Contrawtor, overhead doors be. v 12'. rhairman Bas any parking on Linc primary service is indicated that they going to 10 employe Chairman Basnik thy petitioners reques, interior lot lines, lot setback rather the required one 1 conditions by staf Mr. Brettrager mo UPON ROLL CALL Motion carrier" by This Case must sti I ided for service acmes he building, eliminati if also stated that ti will be met which incl cades, screening of ri: nd landscaping per ste for the Village of Mai existing non-conformii very difficult to devi ,m stated that side iiany ,se proposed for Paren :t year. Miss Farnham krdinate the front set' iti and Raffelli. Miss i the Fire Department proposed building.. Mi ictions. that type of business kted that Nicholas and Pratt asked what siz Wolf stated that the questioned if the pet St. Hr. Wolf stated )ther job sites. Mr. D irently have 8 employe So their parking need itertatned a motion to allow a 5' parking 10 ier thwi 10' and a 15' 1 301 as required by C 501 lead ng space inc Ir. Pratt seconded. Lannon, Pratt, Brother Skowron, Basnik None to of 6-0. e heard before the Vil Michelle Thomy Recording Secret !-V-91 try 28, 1.991 ! of 2 D the the need for 3nditions a face brick top approved Prospect, -1 lot which without any ant setbacks nd Raffelli ed that an with the nham owed the fire arnham stated petitioner is ;ociates are a .11 the ;s will be 12' )ner foresees : their 4bourg potentialW- 7e minimal. int the ?tbacks along Int parking , and to t,;aive Lng the rettrager, Board. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount, Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT' ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W -1 - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1991 CASE NO.: ZBA-12-V-91 APPLICANT: LINCOLN STREET PARTNERS (NICK PAPANICHOLAS, RIC DIESCHBOURG) ADDRESS: 230-240 EAST LINCOLN STREET LOCATION MAP: m PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: 1-1 LOT SIZE: 45,500 % COVERAGE: 78.5% F -A -R. : 29.3% Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Boar Appeals Page 2 REOUES The applicant is requesting I industrial building and on -sit: 1. Section 14.2202.E to a than 10 ft. as required 2. Section 14.3012.E to v Summary of application: warehouse/office building at 6 office/warehouse spaces. L warehouse storage needs. perimeter setbacks to five f f4 The proposed building desil warehouses on the west. Pt to the office entrances. A se access to overhead doors in access around the building, The double -sided building narrow lot width all contri the building setbacks and addition, all required on - maximum allowed. Staff setback with the approved front setbacks. A coord appearance of the street If are wide enough to accorr, allowing variations to accommod king - 5 foot parking lot setbacks along, 'ode. the required one 12' x 50' loadir [MENTS AND CONCERNS applicant is proposing to con., 240 East Lincoln Street. The bu tenants include building contract( on to reduce the required parkil In addition, the applicant is req r overhead doors are provided P g, eliminating the need for a IM, W Potential Impact: This I ft., it is well below the carr The narrow (140') width r tes, that the surrounding bl( e lots have been developed setback variations were gran lot directly to the west tees office spaces along the east ; is located in the front and the, drive loops around the! west side varehouse areas. This 19-20 foc was required by the Fire Dep& construction of an lot lines rather space. a 13,340 sq. ft. Y will consist of 4- th small office and lot and service drive ;ting, a waiver of the service access to the �p dock. ty is an existing, non- nimum four -acre size it difficult to develop isists of similar, non - =11, older industrial Parenti and Raffaelli of the building and of the building close e building, providing ve also provides fire ire building; and the . Staff notes that all le requirements. In -. is below the 80% coordinate the front ie 15 foot landscaped es will improve the a 5 foot side setbacks Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 The building is designed to allow delivery/service vehicles to drive into the warehouse areas through overhead doors. The applicant states that the tenants in the building will not need loading dock facilities. Delivery vehicles will consist of smaller trucks and vans as opposed to semi -trailers. Staff has no objection to the request to waive the loading dock requirement. R in No major objections were cited by other Village staff. The Fire Department has reviewed and approved the location and design of the service drive which will also function as a fire lane. Engineering notes that the reduced sideyards may hinder access to utilities within easements. The location of hydrants, other utilities and detention are subject to engineering plan review. Despite the size constraints inherent to this existing non -conforming industrial lot, the applicant is proposing a development site plan that meets most current Zoning Code requirements. The 5 ft. parking setbacks requested will provide space for required landscape screening. In addition, the requested setbacks are similar to those granted last year for Parenti and Raffaelli on the adjacent lot. Staff has no objection to the requested parking setbacks or the waiver of loading space requirements. Staff recommends approved of the request as presented on the site plan conditioned on: 1. Face brick on all four building facades. 2. Screening of roof -top mechanical equipment. 3. Landscaping per staff approved plan. DMC -hg Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: GILBERT BASNIX, CHAIRMAN ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS SUBJECT: ZBA 13-A-91, AMENDMENT TO FENCE CODE DATE: MARCH 15, 1991 I cast the sole dissenting vote in the above case and I would like to share with you some of the thoughts that entered into my decision. Those in favor contend that 6 foot fences are routinely approved. In reality, only those that show hardship and do not have an objector who can demonstrate a negative impact on his property have been approved. We have had cases in the past wherein the Petitioner has withdrawn or amended his request as part of a trade- off or after an objection had been filed. I question whether these cases are including among those under review. A total of 615 fence permits were issued during the past 3 years. During that period, 19 variations (3%) were granted for 6 foot fences. This hardly represents an overwhelming clamor on the part of the public for 6 foot fences nor does it appear to be burdensome for staff or the Zoning Board of Appeals. Whenever we legalize any item in our Zoning ordinance that currently requires a variation, we are also denying someone the right to object. To take away that right is a serious matter and should not be done without much soul searching. Those in favor contend that fence materials are sold in 6 foot heights, and in order to meet Code, 1 foot must be cut off. Manufactured products of all types are sold in standard sizes. That does not mean that they cannot be trimmed or altered to fit the purpose for which they are to be used. In this case, in my opinion, 6 feet represents the maximum size that might be desired by the consumer. To think otherwise is to say that all rooms should be 12 feet wide because that is the standard size for carpeting or that material cut off the legs of a pair of trousers should be returned for a refund. Those in favor contend the Petitioner must seek a variance to maintain the 6 foot height and pay $100 to cover the cost of processing and, in add* 11",ton, wait up to 60 days for the process to be completed before 4-�ing a permit. Why not?';,;'Why should this request be singled out*> Why not include or special treatmen fidltl 5#i boats and trailers, sw,0�11'ing pools, sheds, etc.11%1,, The variation process guarantee others the during the past 3 years (615) would have been i There are many instar neighbor. Placing a 6 fence of 5 feet or a situation, especially variety. A solid 6 fo air circulation from as its removal. To scree take years. In addit., foot hedge without a community, this wouR dangerous. Even under our presen owner to be surrounde( sizes and styles and t feet or less in heigr adding insult to injul Not too long ago, one I think is very approl fix it." Our fence ( overwhelming desire f During the past three applicants were perfi Ordinance. Nineteen relief. Our Ordinance works! GB/caf there for a reasom t to oblei ect and had zy fence constructed 4 tt high. ;. in which a 6 foot , >t fence back to back ac �sser height can make-: the existing fence is fence could cut off sul ,isting garden or flowe; 6 foot fence with a 6 it is extremely dift, ,pladder. For the mar only be inconveni, learned politicians Cor this case "If it—' ce is working very w aqe that I have seen. .-s, of the 615 fence p willing to abide by imed and proved hard don't change it. Gilbert Basn: Chairman zoning Board f that is to been in f orce ng that period ce can harm a ast an existing r an unsightly the chain link �ient light and --d thus forcing rot hedge woul%A It to trim a 6 seniors in our . but actually or a propertM ces of ue fence feet would ho I a motto which It broke, don't . There is no its issued, 596 ,e terms of our p and received Appeals VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN— F. DI -ON, VILLAGE MANAGER MT___ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ZBA-13-A-91, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request to amend Article VI of the Mount Prospect Municipal Code as it pertains to fences. The proposed amendments would change the permitted standard fence height from five feet to six feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of February 28, 1991. At the meeting, Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that staff reviewed the current fence standards and prepared amendments to the Ordinance as requested by the Zoning Board of Appeals. She noted that requests for six foot fences are fairly common during the construction season. These requests are rarely met with opposition and typically approved. In addition, fence stock is typically sold in six foot heights. Therefore, people must cut down the purchased stock to meet current Code or request a variation, The process of requesting a variation places a financial and time burden on property owners. Given that these requests are typically approved, staff concurs with the Zoning Board that the Ordinance should be amended to permit six foot fences. Ms. Farnham also noted that several other sections of the Ordinance were amended to reflect the height change and eliminate awkward and redundant language. Also at the meeting, two residents spoke in favor of the proposed amendments. Urry Wassarman, 2000 Lorinquist, stated that he felt the process was overly cumbersome and would prefer a more flexible ordinance. He also stated that the difference between a 5 ft. and a 6 ft. fence is negligible with regard to the impact on the neighbor. Debra Olsen, 719 Chris Lane, stated that the $100 filing fee, the paperwork, and the time involved is difficult for homeowners desiring six foot fences. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed amendments. Chairman Gil Basnik stated that the variation process allows objectors due process. If six foot fences are allowed by Ordinance, no one will construct shorter fences. The other Zoning Board of Appeals members expressed support for the proposed amendments stating that society has changed and people want more privacy. It is the government's responsibility to respond to and reflect these changes. Accordingly, by a vote of 5-1, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of amendments to Article VI of the Mount Prospect Municipal Code as it pertains to fence per the proposed Article VI presented by staff. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING (DEPARTMENT Mount,Pmspect, Illinois TO: FILE FROM: JULIE FARNHAM, PLANNER DATE: MARCH 12, l9" I SUBJECT: REQUESTS FOR SIX FOOT FENCES Following are statistics on requests for 6 foot fences reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals since January 1, 1987, YEAR Nom' APPROVED DENIED 1987 11 0 1988 6 0 1989 3Q 1990 10 0� Of the thirty requests made since 1987, all but two cases have been. unanimously approved. JF:hg MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 13-A-91 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: Hearing Date: February 28, 1991 Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Street February 12, 1991 Consideration of Amendments to Article VI of the Mount Prospect Municipal code as it pertains to fences. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:Larry Wasmund , 2000 Lonnquist Deborah Olsen, 719 Chris Ln. Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting consideration of amendments to Article IV of the Mount Prospect Municipal Code as it pertains to fences. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village o'f Mount Prospect, stated that staff prepared the proposed amendments as requested by the Zoning Board of Appeals at the last meeting to allow 61 fences as the standard height. Miss Farnham continued by stating that 6' fence height variation requests are routinely approved and staff feels the zoning ordinance should reflect this. Miss Farnham stated the current 51 height limitation places a hardship on the property owners in two ways: Fence materials are sold in standard 6' height sections. A foot must be out off the purchased stock to meet Code or, property owners may seek a variance to maintain the 6' height. In this case, the owner must submit the required application materials and pay $100.00 to cover the cost of processing the variation. They must wait until the request is processed before obtaining a permit. The process takes approximately 60 days. Mr. Lannon asked how many 6' fence cases have been approN-ed in the last 3-5 years. Miss Farnham stated that an average of f1 i se,, -en and; one h a I ;as es requested that thisIN e in Board, Chairman Flash! 'st half cases a year A not stated that these c ses d been cases not aper ved b Chairman Basnik W, stat homeowners wit �re�rawn the puts the hardship o:. p' p = ,lowering ;the p'rocesr,;rng f should only be alli filed if Larry Wasmund of 2010 Lon Holmes Junior High ,:hoof ordi.ranti'En, qhc,r:>d be,:,7amwnd R Deborah Nilsen of 714 Chri 5100.00 is a lot oflmoney process is a hassle j Mrs. Skowron statedlothat the request,. She doOl s not exception, but the ele. Mr. Brettragnr stat #d tha want more privacy e fee government: to respo� to; J Mr. Lannon stated t at 'fit developed suburb. I Is n and people wart pri acy f that the only pbjecions, disgruntled ne:ighbo,s, wh fence. fir. Lannon a= so at not complicate the rites. variation process it a bu r Chairman Basnik staed he height. Y i Chairman Basnik the erste petitioners requestl�f ra Village of Mount pr spect Municipal �!Code, frog 5 fe r, Mr. Brettrager move, Mrs 1, r 1 t r rM1 Bard 'a yea d with the that he £e ge number, e a hardsh e of 'neigh at he feel s fenced i bor. Chair $50.00. i Nation A t, stated ing. Wt, ar r this t.y-1 e, stated a processi nd other boars eve 6' fences iety-; has chane is the respot changes. spect is an ix aracteri zed' b heir ,neighbor: to these regz eal objection: that governmei Prospect cil for such a tri s every fence ed a,motion is the height; 1 c_le ,VI of tl 6 feet. wron seconded un Village one_ Ak lave ts. . This ;gested ices abuts z. ire for aple A i spac-,� stated from the gated to s est;. ' in e he rospect 0 ZBA-13-A-91 February 28, 1991 Page 3 of 3 UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Brettrager, Skowron NAYS: Basnik Motion carried by a vote of 5-1. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MountTrespect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: FEBRUARY 19, l"l CASE NO.: ZBA-13-A-91 APPLICANT- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ADDRESS: 100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET REQUEST Consideration of amendments to Article VI of the Mount Prospect Municipal Code as it pertains to fences. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS AND CONCERNS ftkWund The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance currently limits the permitted height of fences to five feet in residential areas. Over the years, a considerable number of variation requests (30 since January 1, 1987) have been processed to allow six foot high fences. These requests have met little opposition and are routinely approved. The current five foot height limitation places a hardship on the property owners in two ways: 1. Fence materials are sold in standard 6 foot height sections. A foot must be cut off the purchased stock to meet Code. 2. Property owners may seek a variance to maintain the 6 foot height. In this case, the owner must pay $100.00 to cover the cost of processing the variation. They must wait until the request is processed before obtaining a permit. The process takes approximately 60 days. Staff must also spend time processing and reviewing these requests. While the requests are not complex, during the construction season, at least one, and often two fence variations are included on each Zoning Board of Appeals Agenda Description of Proggsed Amendments: As requested by the Zoning Board of Appeals, the amended fence ordinance changes the permitted standard fence height to six feet rather than five feet. Consequently, staff realized that several other sections of the ordinance would also have to be amended to reflect this change. The revised ordinance is listed below, with major changes underlined. Also, the existing fence requirements are attached for reference. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals ARTICLE VI (PROPOSED) FENCES SECTION. 21.601. Height and Location 21.602. Construction 21.603. Issuance of Permits 2.1604. Variations Sec. 21.601. Height and Location. A. Fences not more than six &§t (60 in height will be-pgmft1td,,,a on the Exhibit at the end of this Article: 1. Along the interior lot lines, behind the front line of the,pri 2. On comer lots, along exterior side lot tines, any fence sha the principal building. (Ord. 3178, 1-19-82) 3. All fences shall be entirely on private property. Fen adjoining lots or public Rights -of -Way. B. Fences and gates at least four feet six inches (4W), but not height to completely surround swimming pools other than raised deck at least four feet six inches (4'6") above grade an 1. Along the perimeter of the pool walk areas; or 2. Along the perimeter of the lot as described in Subsection. C. In industrial and contmeragl districts as defined by Chapter 14 Code, fences not more than eight feet (8') in height will be pe' purpose of screening accessory building material, equipment uses. (Ord. 3375, 10-18-83) [a 14 Page 2 follows, and as shown ,cipal building. placed entirely behind may not encroach on r than aix fget (6) in ,rung pools having a be placed as follows: 1 and 2 herein. itled "Zoning" of this ed when used for the vehicle storage yard Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 F. w -ay areas. as doignated' Bounder and Floodwav May, Sec. 21.602. Construction. A. Fences shall be constructed so that the side facing an abutting lot is smooth finished. when placed aloi3g exterior lot lines abutti artedal streets. B. It shall be unlawful to construct or maintain anywhere within the Village a fence equipped or having barbed wire, spikes or any similar device, or any electric charge sufficient to cause shock, except barbed wire used for maximum security approved by the Board of Trustees. Chain link fence shall be erected so that the barbs are on the bottom. C. 1 n for Private Bloilding Code. D. Fences used for the puMose of screening in commercial indu5tri,11 distrigts shall be w v afterngte board,board-on-board E. Fences used for security purposes may be constructed of rgsidgritial use, in which of w F. In districts other than Single -Family Residence Zoning Districts, the Village may require that fence areas be landscaped with low height plantings or other material to be approved by the Department of Planning and Zoning. (Ord. 3436, 7-3-84) G. n unless a grading plan is whmitted ta and approved by the r Sec. 21.603. Issuance of Permits. The Director of Inspection Services is hereby authorized to issue a permit for the construction of a fence provided: A. A survey or scaled site sketch illustrating proposed fence location, height, and material is submitted along with a properly completed building permit application. B. It shall be unlawful to proceed with the construction of any fence before a permit for such work has been obtained from the Department of Inspection Services. (Ord. 3436, 7-3-84) Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Sec. 21.604. Variations. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall I for variations from the height and location set back regulation provided that no variation shall exceed the maximum heights pe twenty percent (20%) and no variation shall reduce the requirements permitted herein by more than twenty percent (2 may be granted to allow a fence of up to a maximum of eight f fence is erected along a side or rear interior lot line servi residentially and non -residentially zoned properties. Variation in accordance with the provisions of Article VI entitled 'Varia Code. (Ord. 3436, 7-3-84) Staff recommends approval of the proposed amendments to Code including the suggestions made by other Village staff. MEM, Page 4 ad decide all requests tained in this Article, d herein by more than = location setback -xcept that a variation `) in height when such a boundary between :sts shall be processed of Chapter 14 of this have been met with a variation places a foot fences. Given Teves the ordinance VI of the Municipal rfZot.4-r .5;-Tmr,-r f?.O.". M VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W) FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 12, 1991 SUBJECT: OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB VILLAGE - LEXINGTON HOMES MINOR CHANGE TO CONSENT DECREE On November 6, 1990, the Village Board approved a minor change to the Consent Decree for Old Orchard Country Club Village. This minor change allowed the introduction of a townhome unit to the development, as an alternative to the manorhomes. The proposed townhomes reduced overall density at the development from 332 to 309. Prior correspondence on this matter is attached. At the time of the townhome approval, Lexington believed that the minor change would allow construction of the townhomes or the originally approved manorhomes. Staff interpreted the Board action to be approval for only the townhomes. Lexington would now like Board approval to build either the townhome units or the manorhomes, based on market demand. Staff has no objection to the "either/or" approach as the site plan, open space and parking are not effected by either design. This approach would allow Lexington more flexibility in the development of the Old Orchard Country Club Village. DMC:hg Vi.,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL. PtANKING AND ZONING DEPART&MM Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: OCTOBER 31, 1990 SUBJECT: OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB VILLAGE - LEXINGTON HOMES MINOR CHANGE TO CONSENT DECREE Lexington Homes Old Orchard Country Club Village is being constructed pursuant to a Consent Decree, approved in early 1988. This Consent Decree approved a 332 unit manorhome project, along with a site plan, landscape plan and building elevations. As you know, construction!is�well underway at this development, with Phase I complete and a substantial number of umits, occupied. At this time, Lexington Homes would like to introduce a new product at this development, a two-story townhome with a two -car garage. Lexington believes" that a townhome unit would provide potential buyers an alternative to the manorhome, and be a positive addition to the development. The proposed townhomes would take the place of manorhomes on the approved plan, on exactly the same foundation. This is not a proposal for an increase in density. For example, an eight unit manorhome building would become a six -unit buildin"&with the introduction of the townhomes. In fact, the number of units is reduced front; 332 to 309 with the townhome product. Inasmuch as the townhomes are built on the same foundation as the manorhome buildings, there is no change to the approved site plan or landscape plan. Building elevations would be modified slightly, but the same architectural character, colors, and exterior materials would remain. The staff and the Village Attorney have reviewed this proposal, and believe this is a minor change to the Consent Decree. As stated, the number of units is reduced, building height remains the same, there are no changes to the site plan or open space, exterior materials are unchanged, and there is no decrease in the ratio of parking spces, per unit. As such, the Village Board can authorize the change without amending theConsent Decree. Based on this information, staff would recommend that the Village Board authorize a minor ' i change to the Old Orchard Consent Decree to allow townhome units. Additional information from Lexington Homes is attached. DMC:hg Attachment February 20, 1991 Mr. David M. Clements Director of Planning and zoning Village of Mt. Prospect 100 South Emerson Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056 RE. Old Orchard Country Club Mt, Prospect, Illinois Dear Mr. Clements: FEB 2 6 1991 On November 1, 1990, 1 submitted revised prints of our Preliminary Development Plan and requested the Village's approval. I proposed replacing sixty-eight (68) coach home units with forty-five (45) townhome units without any change to the road and building pad locations. The Village Board approved this change at its November 6, 1990 meeting. The intention of the upper management of Lexington Homes, Inc. was to permit the flexibility to build either the original or the proposed plan. My letter and the oral presentation made to your Board did not make this clear. Consequently, I am submitting to you ten (10) additional prints of the originally and most recently approved Preliminary Development Plans (June 9, 1988 and October 26, 1990). I would like to request the Village's approval in building either plan. If this is not possible, then Lexington Homes would like to withdraw its last request, the townhome plan, and return to the coach plan as originally approved. The building floor plans and elevations will remain the same. I look forward to appearing before your next available village Board meeting. Thank you for your time and cooperation. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, j�evin S. Borgard Director of Planning KSB/jaf Enclosures cc: Bill Rotolo, File 2.2b 1156 West Shure Driwo Arlington Heights, Illinois 60004*708/253-9770o FAX: 253-3425 Writer's Direct Die! '61 ic ► W- H— Preliminary P.U.D. Development PIan Did OrCh.rd C�lry Club VIDSOO Mt, ftospw, RM.M. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. 'DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WC FROM: ' DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 13, 1991 SUBJECT. LAKE CENTER PLAZA RESUBDIVISION II NORTHWEST CORNER OF ALGONQUIN ROAD AND WALL STREET ALSO DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION FOR LOT 1 -WIDTH TO DEPTH RATIO The applicant, The Alter Group, is asking approval of the Lake Center Plaza Resubdivision 11 plat in order to change the lot line between Lots I and 2 of the original Lake Center Plaza Subdivision. The site is zoned 1-1 (PUD) and the Comprehensive Plan identifies it for Industrial/Office use. The total size of the resubdivision is 8.254 acres. Staff would note that the proposed resubdivision is surrounded by other industrial uses and currently vacant lots proposed for industrial and office research. Both lots have adequate access onto Wall Street and easement provisions have been completed. The Zoning Code states that the minimum lot size for an industrial lot is 4 acres. A variation was approved in 1987 to allow a 2 acre minimum lot size for this development. Lot 1 is 2.6 acres in size and Lot 2 is 5.6 acres. In addition to the resubdivision item, the applicant is also seeking approval of the Development Code modification needed for the approximately 77 foot frontage for Lot 1. Section 16.403.C.2.f of the Development Code states that the maximum width to depth ratio for a lot shall not exceed 1 to 21/2. Staff would note that the irregular frontage of this lot is primarily caused by Lot 13 which will be used for a pond/stormwater retention facility. Staff believes there will be adequate frontage for Lot 1 for access to the lot. The Plan Commission met in regular session on March 6, 1991 and voted 8-0 in favor of recommending approval of both the resubdivision and Development Code modification noted above. Staff had no objections to either item. MES:hg 478.93 CENTER PLAZA LAKE a 2y RESUBDIVISION NO. OF PART OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 23, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST �c ? L OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERICIIAN, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. Tom- r N-A ... L O T t 4 _ L c P'-A74 ,PEC. ✓G/G✓ 4 '. d_ 58232' ,. s R LOT I w° v 16.54 z' ! 15. _e ,A 4712`. VrC (} .% LASE 6 E SES'Eh ` NO 1 •� -'. ;Q,�" y . � � �,,, 4Q: 0 g .., ,A4V .. a ss-,``Ii,EREPOFORE P£G',C-rtf, FOR r�E': iC ,,p EE7 NEP VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MARCH 12, 1991 SUBJECT: RECAPTURE AGREEMENT AMENDMENT TO DEVELOPMENT CODE AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS IN THE VILLAGE CODE Attached you will find an Ordinance amending Chapter 8 and Chapter 16 which will clarify, improve and consolidate regulations governing recapture agreements. At the present time, recapture agreements are controlled by ordinances in both the Development Code and under Miscellaneous Provisions in the Municipal Code. In essence, the proposed Recapture Agreement Ordinance will change the wording of Section 8.511 to simply refer to Section 16.609 of the Development Code for all regulations regarding recapture agreements. Under the Development Code, recapture agreements could be requested for an expanded number of public facility improvements and the details of such agreements would be controlled by the Village Board. At the request of the Village Board, the Plan Commission reviewed this item during their regular meeting on Wednesday, March 6, 1991 and voted 8-0 in favor of recommending its approval. The Village Attorney and Village staff have reviewed the Ordinance and have no objections to it. DMC:hg bh/caf 1/8/91 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 AND CHAPTER 16 OF THE VILLAGE CODES OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES, OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 8.511 entitled "Reimbursement for Facilities Beneficial to Property and Part of the Property Owned or Controlled by Such Person; Collection of Fees from Owners" of Chapter 8 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect be amended in its entirety and the following substituted therefor; so that hereinafter said Section 8.511 of Chapter 8 of the Village Code shall be and read as follows: Sec. 8.511. Reimbursement for Facilities Beneficial to Property not Part of the Property owned or Controlled by Such Person; collection of Fees From Owners. The President and Board of Trustees shall have the authority to adopt an Ordinance providing for the apportionment of costs of certain public improvements pursuant to Section 16.609 of this Code. SECTION TWO: That Section 16.609 entitled "Recapture Agreement" of Chapter 16 be amended in its entirety and the following substituted therefor; so that hereinafter said Section 16.609 of Chapter 16 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be and read as follows: it Sec. 16.609. Recapture Ordinances. A. Wherever: (1) a Municipal Ordinance of the Village requires the installation of any water mains, sanitary sewers, storm drains, roadways or other public facilities; and (2) where, in the opinion of the corporate authorities such facilities may be used for the benefit of additional property not controlled by the person of whom installation is required; and (3) such water mains, sanitary sewer, storm drains, roadways or other facilities are to be dedicated to the public, the corporate authorities. may, by Ordinance, require that additional property benefitted by such facilities not be permitted to be developed or not be permitted to connect to the facilities unless a fair and reasonable portion of certified costs of installation, including engineering costs are reimbursed to the installing party. 1. The Village shall have the sole authority to determine the following: a. The amount of interest, if any, which may be charged to a benefitted property owner (not to exceed 10% simple interest/annum); b. The method by which the costs are to be certified; C. The fair and reasonable apportionment of costs; d. The party responsible for collection of the apportioned costs; Recapture Page 2 of 2 e. The service charge due establishment of the recaps f. The amount of time (not to e that the Ordinance shall rf 9. The amount by which the; should be reduced due to do h. The method by which the enforced; i. Any other matters pertinent the Ordinance. B. Any Ordinance adopted pursuant to S shall be filed with the Recorder of De The Ordinance shall provide that it is of the installing owner to record tho C. The recording of the Ordinance, in, serve to notify persons interested property of the fact that there wi relation to such property for the c61 of the facilities constructed under', SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance or part: conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION FOUR: That, this Ordinance shall be effect from and after its passage, approval pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Far Village Presi ATTEST: Carol A. Fiel Village Clerk the Village for are Ordinance; :ceed twenty years) vain in effect; apportioned costs oreciation; :dinance is to be to the adoption of bsection A herein 4s of Cook County. the responsibility Ordinance. :his manner, shall ,n such additional 1 be a charge in vection to and use he Ordinance. 11 of ordinances in in full force and ind publication in , 1991. BH/ caf. 3/14/91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding a new Section 18.100; so that hereinafter said Section 18.100 shall be and read as follows: Sec. 18.100. Adoption by Reference of the Illinois Vehicle Code The Illinois Vehicle Code, also known as Illinois Revised Statutes, Ch. 95-1/2, is hereby adopted by reference in its entirety, along with any and all subsequent amendments thereto, as though fully set forth in this Chapter 18. Unless otherwise specified in this Chapter 18, the penalties and all administrative revocation or suspension procedures are included in this adoption by reference. Any proceeding resulting from a violation of an Illinois Vehicle Code regulation, written as a violation of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, shall be deemed to be a civil matter for purposes of burden of proof and rules of court. The only exceptions to this shall be citations written for offenses permitting incarceration as a penalty or if the Illinois Vehicle Code specifies otherwise. The fact that a particular activity is proscribed or regulated in both the Illinois Vehicle Code and another Section of Chapter 18 shall not affect either the validity of this adoption by reference or the validity of the Village Code of Mount Prospect regulation. Any regulation found in the Illinois Vehicle Code may be cited as a regulation of the Village Code of Mount Prospect by placing before it the number 18- . (For example, Section 11-601(a) of the Illinois Vehicle Code would be Section 18- 11-601(a) as a section of the Village Code of Mount Prospect)." SECTION TWO: That all ordinance or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are hereby repealed. SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provide by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991. ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Village President Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: MARCH 14, 1991 SUBJECT: REVIEW OF TAXICAB RATES On January 2, 1991, the Village Board adopted an Ordinance to increase the taxi fares. The Ordinance was adopted subject to a review by the Board of the service being provided by March 31, 1991. If said service, in the sole discretion of the Board, has not substantially improved, the rate increase may be rescinded with no further hearing required. Attached is a report on taxi service prepared by Human Services Administrator Nancy Morgan. American Taxi operates 21 cabs in the Village while Elk Grove Cab and Community Cab operate a total of 7 cabs between the two companies. In October, when the new senior taxi discount program went into effect, there were six complaints against American Taxi. In November, there Were seven complaints against American Taxi. Most of the complaints were about late arrivals or failure to accept the senior discount card. Before the December 11 Public Hearing on, the proposed taxi fare increase, there were two complaints against American Taxi in December. After the Public Hearing, there was one more complaint against American Taxi in December, one in January, two in February and three so far in March. There have been no complaints against Elk Grove Cab or Community Cab. Whenever there is a complaint, the cab company is notified and the appropriate action is taken. Although one complaint is one too many, I feel UW, American Taxi has worked to reduce the complaints from six or seven a month to an average of two a month since the warning in December. The rate increase approved on the Village. The increase was; that the increase approved on JPB/rcw ranuary 2 applies to any cab )Proved due to escalating op( armary 2 should be made pe JOHN P. BURG ,nies that operate in costs. I recommend Village of �,ount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN BURG, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: NANCY MORGAN, HUMAN SERVICES ADMINISTRATOR DATE: MARCH 7, 1991 SUBJECT: TAXICAB UPDATE On October 1, 1990, the Village of Mount Prospect revamped the Discount Taxicab program from a set rate program to a. meter, based program. On January 3, 1991, the Village of Mount Prospect changed the'ordinance to increase the taxi rates. In n. general, I noticed a substantial decrease in complaints since the Discount Taxicab program was revamped in October but little change in complaints since the. Village changed the ordinance controlling the taxi rates in January. The Human Services Division has received no complaints against Elk Grove Taxi since October, 1990, no complaints against Community Cab since they started with the program in January, 1991, and we average approximately two complaints a month against American Taxi since October, 1990.