HomeMy WebLinkAbout4187_001VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
5. �, - 0'.'�'-
Next ordinance No. 4270
Next Resolution No. 6-91
4i
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior citizen Center February S, 1991
so south Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Donald Weibel
AMIN, uluiligilmimv,
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Busse February 5, 1991
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, January 15, ISovi.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, January 22, 1991
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Request to authorize a Village sponsored event
"Support of Troops" - along with associated
costs. This event will take place on Sunday,
February 10th at Prospect High School field
house from 3 to 5 PM.
B. Fire and Police Station referendum update.
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 93 -SU -90, 2218 S. Busse Road
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
ORDINANCE NO. 4180 TO PERMIT THE OPERATION
OF A CAR WASH WITHIN AN EXISTING PLANNED
UNIT DEVELOPMENT
This ordinance amends the Planned Unit Development
governing the subject property to permit the
operation of a car wash. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this Special Use
by a vote of 5-1. (Exhibit A)
B. ZBA 94 -SU -90 and ZBA 95-V-90, 812 Deborah Lane
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL
USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 812 DEBORAH LANE
This ordinance grants a Special Use to permit
a 3 -car garage and a variation to permit a
driveway 34 feet wide. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends granting these requests by
a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B)
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIV
ENTITLED FIRE LANES OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE
This Ordinance updates the list of designated
Fire Lanes in the Village Code, in accordance
with the recommendation of the Fire Prevention
Bureau. (Exhibit C)
Ix. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 2-V-91, 243 North Yates
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a 4 foot separation between the principal structure
and an accessory structure, rather than the
required 10 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommends granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
B. ZBA 4-Z-91 and ZBA 5-V-91, 2020 East Euclid Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting the western portion
of this lot be re -zoned from B-4 to B-3 in order
to construct a small commercial shopping center.
Variations are requested to allow a zero foot
sideyard adjacent to a commercial use, rather than
the required 10 feet; to allow parking lot
setbacks; and to allow IS on-site parking spaces
rather than the required 44 spaces. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommends granting the rezoning
by a vote of 6-0 and the variations by a vote
of 4-2.
C. ZBA 8-V-91, 101 South Maple Street
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit
an accessory facility to accommodate handicapped
persons at the Historical Museum; to allow more
than one building on a lot; to allow the 775
square foot accessory building, rather than
the permitted 120 square feet; to allow a height
of 151 411 for the existing carriage house (garage);
and, to allow 2 on-site parking spaces rather than
the required 8 spaces. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommends'granting the variations by a vote of 6-0.
D.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE -AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
AND DELIVERY OF AN"INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION
AGREEMENT AND REALLOCATION OF PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND
VOLUME CAP IN CONNECTION WITH THE ISSUANCE OF
CERTAIN SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE REVENUE BONDS AND
RELATED MATTERS
(Exhibit D)
E.
Authorize execution of Plat of Easement for
storm sewer and electrical easements in
conjunction with enlarging the parking lot at
the northeast corner of Busse Ave. and Main St.
F.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8 OF
THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinances establishes a .25% sales tax,
effective September 1, 1991.
(Exhibit E)
G.
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
This Resolution authorizes the appropriation of
$8,000 from MFT Funds for the pavement
investigation program.
(Exhibit F)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Proposal for microphones for the Board meetings
in the Senior Citizen Center
B. Accept Triton Engineering proposal for reviewing
RJN storm water management engineering report
at a cost not to exceed $8,500.
C. Request to accept proposal from R.J.N. Environmental
to conduct a flood managment study in the Boxwood/
Wheeling Road area, which project would be funded
with Community Development Block Grant funds.
D. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JANUARY 15, 1991
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Donald Weibel
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Weibel.
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of MINUTES
the Mayor and Board of Trustees held January 2, 1991.
Upon roll call: Ayes: 'Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Weibel, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to approve the minutes of the Special meeting of
the Mayor and Board of Trustees held January 8, 1991.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Pass: Corcoran
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund $ 825,535
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 9,168
Community Development Block Grant Fund 14,429
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 65,881
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 431,987
Parking System Revenue Fund 3,866
Risk Management Fund 51,740
Motor Equipment Pool Fund 501
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A -
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B -
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 5,674
Special Service Area Const. #5 -
Special Service Area Const. #6 -
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) 2,775
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) -
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 -
Debt Service Funds 677,553
Flexcomp Trust Fund -
Escrow Deposit Fund 34,443
Police Pension Fund -
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
$2,128,719
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVE BILLS
Trustee Florost seconded by Trustee Van Geem, =Ve:'
accept the financial report dated December 31,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Flores,
van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA NOTIFICATION Lloyd Levin, resident
REQUIREMENTS asked if the requir,eme
feet of the property
hearing before the Z
expanded past that 25(
sign required to be
in a prominent locati
mayor Farley stated th
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
ILLINOIS CRIME
Mr. Scanlon, of Security Link, stated that one swcr~.
PREVENTION
member of a police Department in Illinois is chosen as
OFFICER OF THE
of the Illinois Crime,Prevention officer of the Year,
YEAR 1991
co-sponsored by the Illinois crime Prevention Off ice r 5
SGT.DICK DRAFFONE
Association and Security Link Company.
BILLIARD/CAFE
Mr. Scanlon announced that Mount Prospect Police Sgt.
Richard Draffone had,been chosen as the recipient cf
this award for 1991. A plaque and check for $500 was
presented to Sgt. Draffone.
COMMEND PUBLIC
Trustee Van Geem expressed appreciation to the Pub1i"-
WORKS DEPT.
Works Department for the excellent condition of the
roadways in the Village due to the plowing activit--es.
CONCERNS
Don Harmon, 16 North William Street, expressed concerns
relative to the parking permitted in the parkway in
front of the former Busse School building and tte
flooding issue.
ZBA NOTIFICATION Lloyd Levin, resident
REQUIREMENTS asked if the requir,eme
feet of the property
hearing before the Z
expanded past that 25(
sign required to be
in a prominent locati
mayor Farley stated th
Page 2 - J
of Crystal Towers Condominiums.nt to notify residents within 25.
being the subject of a public
)ning Board of Appeals could to
foot requirement and ensure tne
pasted on the property be Placed
at while the 250 feet is required
is, he 'would ask staff to provide
n on this subject.
Prospect Commons Shopping Center
ordinance granting a Special Use
within the Mount Prospect Commons
continue -;?resented, having been continue
d meeting of the village Boari
of the Petitioner.
seed is to permit a billiard/cafe
shopping center, located at tne
Golf and Busse Roads.
a in opposition to this request.
expressed include:
runs of the establishment would
t
y hazard for the neighborhood
ocal streets, and loitering in the
the shopping center;
y 15, 1991
MAYOR'S REPORT
No report.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 82 -SU -90
ZBA 82 -SU -90, Mount
MOUNT PROSPECT
The 2nd reading of an
COMMONS SHOPPING
for property located
BILLIARD/CAFE
Shopping Center was
from the January 2n
pursuant to a request
The Special Use reque
ithin this
parlour within
northwest corner of
Several resident spo)
Some of the concerns
Intoxicated pat
create a safe
residents, use 1
parking lot of
Page 2 - J
of Crystal Towers Condominiums.nt to notify residents within 25.
being the subject of a public
)ning Board of Appeals could to
foot requirement and ensure tne
pasted on the property be Placed
at while the 250 feet is required
is, he 'would ask staff to provide
n on this subject.
Prospect Commons Shopping Center
ordinance granting a Special Use
within the Mount Prospect Commons
continue -;?resented, having been continue
d meeting of the village Boari
of the Petitioner.
seed is to permit a billiard/cafe
shopping center, located at tne
Golf and Busse Roads.
a in opposition to this request.
expressed include:
runs of the establishment would
t
y hazard for the neighborhood
ocal streets, and loitering in the
the shopping center;
y 15, 1991
Setting a bad example for the children of
the area;
Whether this type of establishment would be
a benefit to the Village;
Additional traffic on overcrowded roadways.
Trustee Corcoran asked the Petitioner if it would be
acceptable if the village placed a condition on the
Special Use that it would be valid only as long as
he operated the establishment. The Petitioner stated
that he would not opposed such a condition.
Trustee Corcoran also informed the residents opposing
this project that the Village has numerous regulations
that would be enforced to govern appropriate operation of
this establishment.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4268 granting a Special Use being
the subject of ZBA 82 -SU -90.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMONS SHOPPING CENTER
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran
Nays: Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel
Motion failed.
ZBA 93 -SU -90, 2218 South Busse Road ZBA 93 -SU -90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading 2218 S.BUSSE
that would amend ordinance No. 4180 to permit ROAD
a car wash within the Planned Unit Development
commonly referred to as the Rosenow Property,
located on the west side of Busse Road, north of
the Illinois Tollroad.
The Petitioner noted that the original proposal
was to provide a 24 hour car wash, however, in
response to concerns expressed by the Police
Department relative to security, the Petitioner
proposed restricting the hours of operation to
6 AM through 11 PM.
Sanford Stein, attorney for businessmen located
within the Auto Mall on Elmhurst Road, presented
testimony from experts in the field of Planning,
Zoning and traffic control.
The testimony included statements that
from a Planning point of view, a commercial use
such as a car wash is not an appropriate use
within an Industrial Planned Unit Development.
It was also noted that the private roadway in
this PUD is 24 feet wide and not wide enough
to accommodate the proposed use.
Statements were also made that Busse Road is
already a heavily traveled major roadway and
that egress could be hazardous. oil tank trucks
exit the tank farm from the south side of Busse
Road opposite the subject property and that 2
fatal accidents have occur -red at that intersection.
Page 3 - January 15, 1991
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Floros, Van Geem, Weibel
Nays,: Arthur, Corcoran, Farley
Pass. Busse
Motion failed.
This Ordinance will be presented at the next meeting
of the Village Board on February 5th for second
reading.
ZBA 94 -SU -90 &
ZBA 94 -SU -90 & ZBA 9`5-V-90, 812 Deborah Lane
ZBA 95-V-90
An Ordinance was 'presented for first reading that
812 DEBORAH LANE
would grant a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage and
a variation to permit a+driveway '34 feet wide. The
Zoning Board of Appeals 'recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 6-0.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at
the next meeting of the VillageBoardon February 5th.
ACCEPT PUBLIC
A request was presented to accept the public
IMPROVEMENTS:
improvements installed in conjunction with the Frediani
FREDIANI COURT
Court Subdivision located on the west side of Busse
SUBDIVISION
Road between Central Roadand; Lincoln Street.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to
accept the public improvements installed in conjunction
with the Frediani Court Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, =lords,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays': None
Motion carried.
ACCEPT
A request was presented to accept the improvements
IMPROVEMENTS:
installed in conjunction with the ;Plaza United
PLAZA UNITED
Shopping Center, located on Busse Road between
SHOPPING CENTER
Algonquin Road and Dempster Street.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
accept the improvements installed in conjunction with
the Plaza United Shopping Center.
Upon roll call: Ayes:, Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays. None
Motion carried.
FIRE/POLICE
An Ordinance was presented for second reading, having
STATION
been continued from previous Board meetings, relative
REFERENDUM
to the referendum question to be placed on the
QUESTION.
April 2nd ballot as to whether the voters would support
the construction of a new Fire and Police Station.
Due to the recent selection of .a preferred developer
for the downtown redevelopment district, discussion on
the subject was deferred in order to obtain an opinion
from that developer as to whether the new building
would lend itself to the redevelopment district or if
it should be built at the present location on Northwest
Highway.
Trustee Arthur stated that he has a recommendation
Page 4 - January; 15, 1991
relative to the financing of the new building
and asked that discussion on this subject be
deferred to a Special meeting of the Village
Board on January 22nd. Trustee Arthur stated
that the proposal relative to financing the
building may eliminate the need to increase
property taxes to finance the project, however
the information needs to be prepared for
presentation to the Board.
It was noted that final action must be taken on
this matter on a timely basis since January 31st
is the last day a referendum question may be
submitted to the County Clerk for inclusion on
the April 2nd ballot.
Several residents expressed their support for
the construction of a new Fire and Police Station
and asked that action be taken by the Board in
order to place this question on the ballot
for the April 2nd election.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved
to defer discussion on the wording for the referendum
question relative to a new Fire and Police Station
to a Special meeting of the Village Board on
January 22, 1991.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
ZBA 96-A-90, Text Amendments
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
would amend sections of Chapter 14 (Zoning
Ordinance) as follows:
1. To change the meeting time of the
Zoning Board of Appeals from 8:00 PM
to 7:30 PM;
2. To revise the requirements for lot consolidation.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends granting these
text amendments by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem left the meeting for a brief period
at this point in the meeting.
Page 5 - January 15, 1991
ZBA 96-A-90
TEXT
AMENDMENT
ORD.NO. 4268 Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved for
passage.: of Ordinance Na. 426.8
Al ORDINANCE AMENDING
;a"pEC1FIEDOFS THE VILLAGE t� LLONS �C'E
CHApTER 14 CODE Off' MOUNT ORDINANCE)
T ORE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Weibel
Nays,: None
Motion carried.
resented.. to .accept improvementsA request was p
ACCEPT :installed in conuncti.an with the traffic signal
A
IMPROV NTS: t Schoenbeck and Rand Roads.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL Trustee Busse, moved t
RANG & SCBOENBEC Trustee Arthur, seconded by unction with
RADS accept the improvements installed Oona
the traffic signal on Rand, Road' at Schoenbeck Road.
io �s,
Upon roll call: Ayes Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, F
Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
law BUSINESS that. would
o Chapter '18
AMEND CH. 18 An n ordinance (Fireel ne S' Coched in t
°FIRE LANE amend of,the Village, Vire
in its entirety-
SCHEDULE (Traffic Code)date floe Fire Lane Schedule and
This amendment wouldp that would 'ersit citations to
provide the regulationsregulations-
be
ions .
be issued for violations of the Fire Lane regSth for
a
This Ordinance will be presented
February
second reading*
resented that would authorize
Department
TRAFFIC SIGNAL AResolution was " the installation of
execution of a �reement with the Illinois ep
ALGOI" UI ROAD o Transport tion +rel ative o on in Road
B IARWOOD DR- of Tra '>signals at the inter !tion of Algonquin
and Briarwood Drive.
seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for.
RES.NO. 4-91 Trustee Floras, 4-91
passage of Resolution No.
A RESOLUTION ;AUTSrTWEEENN E VILLAGEOA
OF
JOINT AGREEMENT BEARTMENTDEP
MOUNT PROSOECIT AND THE TA'IIONRELATIVE ITo THE SIGNALI ATION
OF W+OD DRIVE
OF ALGONQU"1N ;ROAD AND BRIAR Floros,
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried. Motor
reSened t would appropriate
MFT DS Resolution W4$ p on in Road. at
SIGNAL Fund Tax Funds in the ffio amountOf
n � ; 6 O cover the
TRAFFIC SI cost of the tra
ALONQUIN RD 6ria ood Drive.
BRIARWOOD DR.
page 6 - January 151 1991
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 5-91
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUNDS ($37,566.67)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem returned to the meeting at this point.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
following proposals for the pavement investigation
program, through core testing, in order to
establish priorities for the street resurfacing
program:
H. H. Holmes Laboratories, Inc. $3,951.63
O'Brien & Associates, Inc. $6,500.00
Soil & Material Consultants, Inc. $7,605.00
It was the recommendation of the administration that
authorization be given to retain H. H. Holmes
Laboratories, Inc. to perform pavement
investigations at a cost not to exceed the budgeted
amount of $8,000.00
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the
administration to accept the proposal from
H. H. Holmes Laboratories, Inc. to perform pavement
investigations at a cost not to exceed $8,000.00
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Dixon presented a recommendation for the purchase
of 17 Police Department squad cars at the State bid
price of $12,510.00 per vehicle for a total of
$212,670.00. The order for these 1991 vehicles,
with a delivery date of May 1, 1991 or after,
must be placed with the State by mid February,
however payment for these vehicles will be made
from funds contained in the 1991/92 fiscal year budget.
Trustee Weibel asked if there were any additional
costs anticipated with this project. The Village,
Manager stated that there is $18,000 in the current
budget for transferring the existing light bars and
any related work required.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
and authorize an order to be placed under the State
bidding award for the purchase of 17 squads cars at
a purchase price not to exceed $212,670.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - January 15, 1991
RES.NO. 5-91
PAVEMENT
INVESTIGATION
H.H.HOLMES
LABORATORIES
• r�
STATUS Mr. Dixon announced that a meeting between the Village
REPORT of Mount Prospect, the Mount Prospect Park District and
Arlington Heights Park District has been scheduled for
Thursday, January 31st at 7:30 PM at the Arlington
Heights Park District Administration Building for the
purpose of discussing the 'pending Melas Park Agreement.
NWMC STORM Trustee Van Geem noted that he had; received notice of
WATER COMMITTEE a meeting sponsored by the Northwest Municipal
Conference relative to storm water control and asked
if Mount Prospect was represented at that meeting. Mr.
Dixon stated that he would inquire of staff and would
get back to the Board on that question.
ADJOURNMENT"
There being no further business to come before the
Board, Mayor Farley declared the ,meeting adjourned.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:43 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 8 - January 15, 1991
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JANUARY 22, 1991
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:45 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Tim Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Donald Weibel
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Mayor Farley.
OLD BUSINESS
Mayor Farley presented a
Eldrup, representing the
Guard support group.
Village flag to Karen
local O'Hare National
Mrs. Eldrup expressed her appreciation for the
flag, noting that the flag will be sent to
troops in Saudi Arabia from Mount Prospect, so
they can display flags from their hometowns.
Mrs. Eldrup also stated that her son is serving
in Saudi Arabia.
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
PRESENT
VILLAGE
FLAG
Mayor Farley stated that this Special Meeting of the FIRE/POLICE
Village Board had been called for the purpose of BUILDING
discussing the proposed advisory referendum question
to be placed on the April 2, 1991 ballot relative to
whether the voters would support the construction of
a new Fire and Police Building.
A suggestion was made to clarify the question by
referring to the building as the "Fire and Police
Station".
There has been discussion as to the location of
the new building. The two options being the existing
location at 112 East Northwest Highway or on Pine
Street where the former Public Works Facility was located.
A recommendation has been received from Broadacre, the
newly designated 'preferred developer' for the
downtown redevelopment to construction the new Fire and
Police Station at the existing location and allow
the redevelopment of the Pine Street site with new
commercial properties.
Trustee Arthur expressed his opinion that the new
building should be construction at the Pine Street
location for economical reasons, noting that the
projected cost of $6,992,000 would be reduced by
$1,200,000.
The other members of the Board, including Mayor Farley,
stated that they supported construction of the new
building at the existing location on Northwest
Highway.
Several residents expressed their opinions on this
subject, a majority of which supported the Northwest
Highway location.
ORD.NO. 4269 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4269
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY
REFERENDUM QUESTION FOR THE SUBMISSION OF
A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE BALLOT FOR THE
APRIL 2, 1991 ELECTION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel, Farley
Nays Arthur
Motion carried.
AWOURNMENT
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to
adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:20.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 2 of 2 - January 22, 1991
General & S eecial Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Fund
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
January 31, 1991
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
1/11/91 through
Per .Attached
Journal
Balance
1110191
1131/91
List of Bills
Entry
1131191
$ 2,657,622
$ 820,728
$ 532,205
$<3,000>
$ 2,943,145
368,210
93,959
21,396
440,773
280
6,500
6,011
769
481
19,559
22,891
3,000
149
3,080,048
181,339
336,586
2,924,801
158,509
10,152
1,449
167,212
1,257,172
172,523
262,607
1,167,088
362,103
75
6,541
355,637
342,687
1,135
13,926
329,896
178,833
-
500
178,333
708,742
37,915
29,512
717,145
11,615
3,600
3,884
11,331
1,243,211
69,343
19,098
1,293,456
15,247,967
234,075
42,267
15,439,775
17,190,471
262,933
43,513
17,409,891
257.033
257.033
$43.064,984
51.913.836
$1.342.386
S -
543.636.434
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ADVERTISING PRODUCTS
BOND REFUND
$25.00.
$25.00
WILLIAM N. ANNEN
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BAIRD & WARNER
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$475.00
DANIEL BALAS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
EDWIN W. BAUMANN
REFUND FINAL BILL
$1.98
REFUND FINAL BILL
$20.52
$22.50
BERTOG'S LANDSCAPING
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
R. BEYER & SONS
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
BROTHERHOOD OF RR SIGNALMEN
BOND REFUND
$250.00
BOND REFUND
$25.00
$275.00
JOHN CAGLE SEWER
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$225.00
CAPITOL CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$445.00
$445.00
CARDUNAL BUILDERS
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
CARLSON BLDRS.
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
MARY CASSATA
REFUND DEPOSIT
$761.25
$761.25
CFM CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$425.00
$425.00
CHICAGO NEON SIGN CO.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
t
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$300.0 0
CITIBANK, N.A.
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS
$1,321.37
PMT INSURANCE CLAIMS
$11,894.00
$13,215.37*
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PMT P/R 1/24/91
$224.25
$224.25*
JOSE A. CONCHA
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$3.52
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$36.48
$40.00
DALCO MFG.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
DANLEY LUMBER
BOND REFUND
$35.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$185.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
P/R ENDING 1/24/91
$39,927.90
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
P/R ENDING 1/24/91
$1,133.99
P/R ENDING 1/24/91
$383,542.89
P/R ENDING 1/24/91
$870.78
$425,475.56*
DOMINICK FOOD STORES
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$450.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$600.00
EVER READY
BOND REFUND
$25.00
$25.00
FELDCO PATIO ROOM, INC.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.0c
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/10
$10,831.92
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/10
$77.42
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/10
$69.66
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/10
$2,724.96
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/10
$996.02
BONDS-KOEPPEN, CONDON
$100.00
SAVINGS BONDS P/R 1/24/91
$350.00
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/24
$12,059.33
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/24
$66.05
DUE TO FEL} DEP PAY 1/24
$3,009.76
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/24
$873.52
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 1/24
$85.87
$31,244.51*
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
MEDICAL BENEFIT REIMB 1/10/91
$3,798.31
DEPENDENT CARE REIMB 1/10/91
$85.25
$3,883.56*
FLUSH SEWER
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
FORTE PLBG.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
ENZO FREDIANI
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
K.F.GORDON CONST.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$150.06
MARIA GOUNTANIS
REFUND CON'T'RACTOR LICENSE
$35.00
$35.00
GRATE SIGNS
BOND REFUND
$25.00
$25.00
GTE DIRECTORIES PUBL. CORP.
REFUND
$60.00
$60.00
TONY GUARISCO PLBG.
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$200.00
HARTL CONST. CO.
BOND REFUND
$25.00
$25.00
IIENDERSON FIRE EQUIPMENT
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
INSURANCE
$25,200.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31191
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
INSURANCE
$29,348.00
INSURANCE
$3,728.00
INSURANCE
$25,175.00
$83,451.00
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
ILLINOIS RANGE COMPANY
REFUND DUPLICATE PAYMENT
$30.00
$30.00
IMPRESSIONS, INC.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT P/R 1/24191
$254.00
$254.00
MARILYN KANEL
REFUND IMRF LIFE INS
$4.50
$4.50
KAY-RAY/SENSALL
BOND REFUND
$250.00
$250.00
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN
REFUND FINAL BILL
$1.76
REFUND FINAL BILL
$17.74
$19.50
JUNG SOOK KIM
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
KOENIG & STREY REAL ESTATE
REFUND FINAL BILL
$15.98
REFUND FINAL BILL
$1.54
$17.52
JAMES LIM
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$.22
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$2.28
$2.50
M & S CONST.
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
ISAGANI MARASIGAN
REFUND TRANSFER TAX STAMP
$414.00
$414.00
MINER & EAST
BOND REFUND '
$375.00
$375.00
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
PPRT-1ST INSTALLMENT 91
$1,637.11
$1,637.11*
MT. PROSPECT ASSOCIATES
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$45.60
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$4.40
$50.00
CAROL E. MURPHY
REFUND DUPLICATE AMB PMT
$125.00
$125.00
RICHARD MURRAY
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
NATIONAL SIGNS INC.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$725.00
NUTRASWEET COMPANY
BOND REFUND
$500.00
BOND REFUND
$475.00
$975.00
OAK TERRACE APTS.
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$10.12
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
$104.88
$115.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
MARVEL OLM
PACIFIC-SAKATA BEV.
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
NICK PEREZ
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
POSTMASTER
PAUL PRZYBORSKI
R J & G .SEWER
ROBINETTE DEMOLITION
ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO.
ROUSE RANDHURST CORPORATION
SABALA PLUMBING
SATURN SIGNS
SCARSDALE DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
THE SIGN PALACE
GEORGE SOLLITT CONST.
T -CON ASSOCIATES
TRAMMEL CROW CO.
TRIFAB & CONST.
TURK ELECTRIC SIGN CO.
U.S.DEMANTELMENT
UNIVERSITY ORTHOPAEDICS
VALLEY IMPROVEMENTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
REFUND DEPOSIT
BOND REFUND
JAN POLICE PENSION DISB
JAN FIRE PENSION DISB
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
REFUND FINAL BILL OVERPMT
MISC EXPENSES
METER ADVANCE DEPOSIT
POSTAGE STAMPS
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
PAYMENT -FIELDS
BOND REFUND
REINSPECTION FEE C0498
REINSPECTION FEE C0949
REINSPECTION FEE C1045/7
REINSPECTION FEE C1102
REINSPECTION FEE C1214
REINSPECTION FEE C2236
INVOICE AMOUNT
$624.75
$425.00
$40,267.41
$42,012.70
$5.34
$.66
$5.00
$3,000.00
$580.00
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$500.00
$100.00
$100.00
$500.00
$100.00
$75.00
$100.00
$75.00
$100.00
$100.00
$500.00
$100.00
$500.00
$500.00
$100.00
$475.00
$675.00
$50.00
$100.00
$25.00
$100.00
$500.00
$50.00
$100.00
PAGE 4
TOTAL
$624.75
$425.00
*
$82,280.11*
$6.00
$5.00*
$3,000.00
$580.00*
$100.00
$200.00
$500.00
$100.00
$700.00
$75.00
$100.00
$75.00
$200.00
$500.00
$100.00
$500.00
$500. OC
$100.00
$475.00
$675.00-
$50.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
REINSPECTION
FEE
C2435
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C2788
$100.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C4008
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C4358
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C4531
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
04670
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C4872
$100.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C5183
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C5755
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C5947
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C5994
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6133
$55.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6299
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6300
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6452
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6496
$75.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6642
$100.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6717
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6809
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6836
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6865
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6870
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6939
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7429
$125.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7659
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7676
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7713
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7714
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7715
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7813
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
08044
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C8217
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
08230
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
1253
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
1254
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
1259
$25.00 $2,605.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TRANSFER TO D/T CONST 1985 $14,592.75
$14,592.75
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TRANSFER TO 1987C
B&I $14,439.50
$14,439.50
LORETTA K. WAGNER
REFUND DEPOSIT
$740.00
$740.00
R. WALDBUESSER
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
PATRICIA WEEKS
REFUND DEPOSIT
$614.25
$614.25
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$693,474.49
GENERAL FUND
$391,383.54
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$1,297.28
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND.
$22,891.25
WATER & SEWER FUND
$45,935.64
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,006.49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$96,666.37
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D
$14,439.50
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987C
$14,592.75
POLICE PENSION FUND
$40,267.41
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$42,012.70
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$3,883.56
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$19,098.00
********************************************************************************************************
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS
LABOR RELATIONS INFO. SYSTEM
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SCHWEPPE & SONS
SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION OF
WOLF AND COMPANY
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
RESERVATIONS
REG-DUNOVICH, PIKE, FRIEDRICHS
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
COFFEE SUPPLIES
MEMBERSHIP DUES
SERVICES RENDERED
$916.57
$110.00
$110.00*
$95.00
$95.00
$58.51
$11.16
$69.6'
$116.90
$116.90
$25.00
$25.00
$500.00
$500.00
***TOTAL** $916.57
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
JOHN F. DIXON
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
APRIL FOLEY
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ICMA
ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC
ANA L. KOYAMA
LABOR RELATIONS INFO. SYSTEM
NANCY MORGAN
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PEDERSEN & HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PRECISION BUSINESS SYSTEMS, IN
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REGISTRATION-CLEMENTS
$323.00
$323.00
ADVANCE EXPENSES-ILCMA CONF
$175.00
$175.00
DELIVERY
$19.50
$19.50
REIMB LCSW LICENSE
$100.00
$100.00
PHYSICAL-FINNEY
$284.00
$284.00
PUBLICATION
$129.30
$129.30-
REGISTRATION-DIXON
$90.00
$90.0
REIMB-LSW LICENSE
$50.00
$50.00
REG-DUNOVICH, PIKE, FRIEDRICHS
$95.00
$95.00
REIMB-LCSW LICENSING
$250.00
$250.00
EMPLOYEE ASSISTANCE PROGRAM
$1,330.88
$1,330.88
LEGAL SERVICES -DEC
$10,437.94
$10,437.94
MISC EXPENSES
$14.65
MISC EXPENSES
$2.65
MISC EXPENSES
$82.56
$99.86*
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
$31.82
$31.82*
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$60.00
$60.00
DUES-DIXON
$183.00
$183.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$471.09
$471.09
***TOTAL**
$14,130.39
$14,130.39
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
ARA/CORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
COFFEE SUPPLIES
$12.85
$12.85
CORTEZ DIXON
COMM ASST C.O.W. MTG
$25.00
$25.00
EDWARD FRANCE
COMM ASST BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
MELANIE KRUPP
COMM ASST -BD MTG
$25.00
$25.00
CAROLYN A. MILLER
COMM ASST ZONING BD
$25.00
$25.00
SUSAN MUELLER
COMM ASST C.O.W. MTG
$25.00
$25.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31%91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SER ALARM SERVICE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES
ROSCOR CORPORATION PARTS
FRANK SMITH COMM ASST H.S. & ZONING BD
WALTER SOSIN COMM ASST C 0 W MTG
THE TAPE COMPANY TAPES
TAPES
TAPES
COMMUNICATIONS DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
$2,519.32
PAGE 8
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$101.59
$101.59
$13.04
$13.04*
$31.74
$31.74
$40.00
$40.00
$25.00
$25.00
$641.70
$2,870.00
$1,265.20
$194.00
$263.20
$2,170.10
***TOTAL** $2,519.32
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DECISION DATA SERVICE INC.
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A.
GEORGE J. HAMMES
I.B.M. CORPORATION
DAVID C. JEPSON
MACRO COMPUTER SYSTEMS
MOORE BUSINESS EQUIPMENT DIV.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PITNEY BOWES INC.
POSTMASTER
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
SENTRY ENVELOPE CO.
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
FEBRUARY MTCE
$84.00
$84.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$55.00
$55.00
DECEMBER SERVICES
$1,500.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,370.00
$2,870.00
MTCE COMPUTERS & PRINTER
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTER & PRINTER
$52.00
$246.00
HUMIDIFIER
$96.29
$96.25
SERVICES RENDERED
$459.00
$459.00
SERVICE
$261.42
$261.42
MISC EXPENSES
$13.90
MISC EXPENSES
$4.57
$18.47*
EQUIPMENT MTCE
$140.00
$140.00*
POSTAGE PERMIT MAILING
$5,689.11
$5,689.11
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$169.85
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$181.29
$351.14
ENVELOPES
$351.25
$351.25
DELIVERY
$18.20
$18.20
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
DAILY HERALD SUBSCRIPTION $148.20 $148.20
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SUPPLIES $15.54 $15.54
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL $51.18
LEGAL 60 66
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
$800.41
$118.68
$65.93
$68.57
$58.02
$73.85
$60.66
$79.12
***TOTAL**
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
BAKKEN/THOMSON%BROWNING/ROTENB SERVICES RENDERED -POPE $90.00 $90.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC
"W-2 MISC" FORMS
$15.1.0
$215.00
$15.10
$215.00
XEROX CORP.
MICE CONTRACT -1048 COPIER
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$10,869.98
GENERAL FUND
$10,869.98
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
DAILY HERALD SUBSCRIPTION $148.20 $148.20
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SUPPLIES $15.54 $15.54
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL $51.18
LEGAL 60 66
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
$800.41
$118.68
$65.93
$68.57
$58.02
$73.85
$60.66
$79.12
***TOTAL**
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
BAKKEN/THOMSON%BROWNING/ROTENB SERVICES RENDERED -POPE $90.00 $90.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
ESCESS LOSS PREMIUM -DEC
$7,193.20
ADMIN FEES -JANUARY
$7,674.00
MED CLAIMS THRU 1/15/91
$32,497.23
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 1/17/91
$30,558.36
MED CLAIMS THRU 1/23/91
$20,987.15
MED CLAIMS THRU 1/29/91
$12,065.97
$110,975.91*
JOAN EURICH
REIMB-TRASH CAN
$26.74
$26.7r
RUSSELL J. FEE, III
LEGAL FEES
$1,674.98
$1,674.96
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES, INC.
SERVICE FEES JANUARY
$578.75
ADMINISTRATION FEE -1991
$347.25
$926.00
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
REIMBURSEMENT
$117.00
REIMBURSEMENT
$203.00
REIMBURSEMENT
$1,203.00
REIMBURSEMENT
$395.50
$1,918.50
HMO ILLINOIS
HEALTH INSURANCE JANUARY
$7,567.53
$7,567.53
HOBBS GROUP, INC.
INSURANCE
$48.60-
INSURNACE
$40.00 -
INSURANCE
$12,600.00
INSURANCE
$14,674.00
INSURANCE
$1,864.40
INSURANCE
$12,588.00
$41,637.80
MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE
P-10 REPAIRS
$153.00
$153.00
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
SERVICES RENDERED
$118.50
$118.50
SUSAN REYNOLDS
REIMBURSEMENT
$14.23
$14.23*
ANTHONY SCHUBMEHL
ACCIDENT 1/10/91
$773.30
$773.30-
Z FRANK OLDSMOBILE
P-15 REPAIRS
$64.40
-$64.4,
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$165,940.89
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$165,940.89
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL
ARIEL BOOKS
B & H INDUSTRIES
CECI
D & B BUSINESS EDUCATION SERV.
RODNEY ERB
GREGORY G. GRAHAM
HALOGEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC
DAILY HERALD
ILLINOIS PLUMBING INSP. ASSOC.
DAN JAKES
R. S. MEANS CO., INC.
NAT'L. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
QUALEX, INC.
SUBURBAN BUILDING OFFICIALS CO
FREDRIC TENNYSON
THOMAS COMPUTER CORPORATION
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
WHITMIRE
JEFFREY WULBECKER
XEROX CORP.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SERVICES RENDERED
PUBLICATION
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REGISTER-WULBECKER, VANDORNICK
WORKSHOP-TENNYSON, BENCIC
SEMINAR EXPENSES
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
SUPPLIES
SUBSCRIPTION
MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
EXPENSES-JAKES
REFERENCE MATERIAL
ELECTRICAL TEST-FRONTZAK
BLDG TESTS-JAKES
REGISTER-BENCIC, WULBECKER
REGISTRATION FEES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PHOTO SUPPLIES
1991 MEMBERSHIP RENEWAL
REGISTRATION FEES
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
COMPUTER PROGRAM
PC SIDECART
ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS
ELEVATOR,INSPECTIONS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SEMINAR-KRUPA
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
CLOTHING SUPPLIES
SERVICE CONTRACT
SERVICE CONTRACT
SERVICE CONTRACT
MTCE-2510 COPIER
INVOICE AMOUNT
$75.00
$34.45
$168.00
$71.00
$130.00
$198.00
$240.00
$28.12
$25.92
$148.20
$30.00
$155.00
$201.45
$75.00
$105.00
$200.00
$380.00
$27.00
$4.56
$27.96
$7.02
$30.00
$260.00
$97.94
$79.99
$159.70
$77.00
$27.00
$257.34
$40.00
$36.38
$17.23
$39.60
$133.00
$29.60
$68.75
PAGE 11
TOTAL
$75.00
$34.45
$239.00
$130.00
$198.00
$240.00
$28.12
$25.92
$148.20
$30.00
$155.00
$201.45
$180.00
$580.00
*
$31.56*
$34.98
$290.00
$177.91'
$159.76
$104.00
$257.34
$40.00
$53.61
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1131/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MTCE AGREEMENT 1035 COPIER
MTCE CONTRACT -1048 COPIER
$4,050.21
PAGE 12
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$150.00
$215.00 $635.95
***TOTAL** $4,050.21
*******************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, IN
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPUTERLAND
COURTESY HOME CENTER
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
THOMAS F. DALEY
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
PARTS
$45.28
PARTS
$9.60
$54.88
SERVICE
$1,125.73
$1,125.73
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$112.00
$112.00
WASH -DECEMBER 90
$280.00
$28'0.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$336.66
$336.66
BH66-JT-5422-A
$7.60
$7.60
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$430.00
$430.00
SUPPLIES
$71.77
$71.77
ENVELOPES
$108.75
$108.75
OFFICER OF THE YEAR RECEPTION
$150.00
$150.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$39.00
$39.00
SUPPLIES
$121.70
SUPPLIES
$121.71
MTCE & COPIES
$105.69
MTCE & COPIES
$60.00
MTCE & COPIES
$260.97
MTCE & COPIES
$159.00
$829.07
REGISTRATIONS
$90.00
$90.00*
SERVICE
$37.83
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$134.39
SERVICE
$20.83
$223.68
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
KALE UNIFORMS
LABOR RELATIONS INFO.
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
STEVEN G. LEONARD
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
SYSTEM
& OFFIC
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
ERIC E. PIEE
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
QUALEX, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 113191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$116.90
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$116.90
$233.80
REGISTRATION-DALEY
$95.00
$95.00
PARTS -DECEMBER
$500.22
$500.22
EXPENSES
$30.30
$30.30
SUPPLIES
$41.72
SUPPLIES
$41.72
SUPPLIES
$41.72
SUPPLIES
$41.74
SUPPLIES
$27.58
SUPPLIES
$22.80
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$1,665.78
SUPPLIES
$65.25
SUPPLIES
$65.25
SUPPLIES
$65.25
SUPPLIES
$65.32
$2,144.13
SUPPLIES
$97.76
SUPPLIES
$382.20
$479.96
TACTICAL UNIT CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.60
PARTS
$30.00
$30.00
PARTS -DECEMBER 90
$1,120.08
$1,120.08
TUITION-NAGEL, WILCOX
$90.00
TUITION-RECKER
$35.00
$125.00
STRESS TESTS
$1,120.00
$1,120.00
MISC EXPENSE
$6.00
MISC EXPENSE
$10.69
MISC EXPENSE
$56.00
MISC EXPENSE
$38.00
MISC EXPENSE
$10.00
MISC EXPENSE
$58.06
$178.75
RADIO REPAIRS
$435.00
$435.00
DEC 90 -STRAYS
$331.00
$331.00
FILM PROCESSING
$29.47
FILM PROCESSING
$1.35
FILM PROCESSING
$49.13
FILM PROCESSING
$1.62
$81.57
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADDISON FIRE DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$120.00
PAGE 14
AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$134.80
$134.8P
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
$94.21
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SERVICE
$148.09
$394.28
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
PARTS
$16.59
$16.59
S.B.A.I.
P.R. SUPPLIES
$62.00
$62.00
SAVE -A -PET
STRAYS -DEC 90
$175.00
$175.00
SHORE GALLERIES, INC.
AMUNITION
$96.00
$96.00
SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATOR
SUPPLIES
$72.89
$72.89
ROBERT SMITH
EXPENSES
$18.00
$18.00
SOMAR ENTERPRISES
SUPPLIES
$135.40
$135.4(
SUN ELECTRIC CORPORATION
EQUIPMENT
$60.60
$60.6(,
TCI OF ILLINOIS
POLICE -CABLE
$4.75
$4.75
TRADE MARK GRAPHICS, INC.
POLICE DECALS
$835.00
$835.00
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TUITION -ROBERT SMITH
$275.00
$275.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$12,615.18
GENERAL FUND
$12,554.58 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
$60.60
********************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADDISON FIRE DEPARTMENT
ICE RESCUE-FIGOLAN, FLORY
$120.00
$120.00
AIR ONE EQUIPMENT, INC.
EQUIPMENT
$134.80
$134.8P
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
SERVICE
$94.21
SERVICE
$151.98
SERVICE
$148.09
$394.28
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
EQUIPMENT
$73.60
$73.60
BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
SUPPLIES
$308.00
$308.00
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
SERVICE
$172.04
SERVICE
$16.22-
$155.82
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
SERVICE
$148.43
$148.43
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE,
LABOR & MATERIALS
$440.94
$440.94
THE CONFERENCE CORPORATION
CONFERENCE-DUMOVICH
$175.00
$175.00
CONNECT INC.
CONNECT NETWORK CHARGES
$7.79
$7.79
VENDOR
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
CPR PUBLISHERS INC.
DIVE RESCUE INC./INTERNATIONAL
DOLTON FIRE EQUIP SALES, INC.
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE
EMERGENCY RESOURCE INC.
FORCE 4
GFE, INC
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
H R HART PHOTO
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
HARBOR FREIGHT TOOLS
HYDRO -TEST PRODUCTS, INC.
IGE, INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS AUTO CENTRAL
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ISFSI
J.H. SERVICE, INC.
LABOR RELATIONS INFO. SYSTEM
LAW ADVISORY COMPANIES, INC.
LIFETREE SOFTWARE INC.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC
MOTOROLA, INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1131/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CPR MANUALS
$390.00
$390.00
EQUIPMENT
$108.47
$108.47
EQUIPMENT
$843.00
$843.00
SUPPLIES
$35.00
SUPPLIES
$30.00
$65.00
INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIAL
$489.69
$489.69
SUPPLIES
$60.51
COMPUTER SUPPLIES
$121.64
$182.15
SUPPLIES
$64.00
SUPPLIES
$64.00
$128.00
EQUIPMENT
$375.00
$375.00
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$274.73
$274.73
MICE & COPIES
$105.69
MICE & COPIES
$60.00
$165.69
EQUIPMENT
$19.38
$19.38
EQUIPMENT
$96.00
$96.00
OXYGEN
$19.00
$19.00
EQUIPMENT MTCE
$575.00
$575.00
SERVICE
$192.14
SERVICE
$75.08
SERVICE
$37.82
SERVICE
$411.53
SERVICE
$24.63
SERVICE
$19.96
$761.16
REGISTRATION-ULREICH
$125.00
$125.0
REPAIR EQUIPMENT
$1,175.00
$1,175.0
REG-DUNOVICH, PIKE, FRIEDRICHS
$95.00
$95.00
REGISTRATION -VALENTINE
$95.00
$95.00
SOFTWARE
$35.45
$35.45
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$82.10
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$41.56
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$7.84
$131.50
SUPPLIES
$94.62
EQUIPMENT
$544.64
$639.26
SUPPLIES
$33.63
$33.63
EQUIPMENT -FINAL
$1,227.00
$1,227.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
NORTHEAST ILL. EMERGENCY MGMT.
MEMBERSHIPS
$200.00
$200.00
NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS FIRE
DUES - ULREICH
$25.00
$25.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$23.31
$23.31
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
MTCE SUPPLIES
$376.74
$376.74
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$4.08
SUPPLIES
$32.73
$36.81
PAGE AMERICA
DEC & JAN SERVICE
$68.26
DEC & JAN SERVICE
$120.24
DEC & JAN SERVICE
$40.96
DEC &''JAN SERVICE
$27.30
$256.76
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
$34.00
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
$38.32
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
$4.00
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
$23.97
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
$13.46
$113.75*
PORT SUPPLY
EQUIPMENT
$982.70
$982.70
DOROTHY L. RECKLING
TRNG-FIRE SUPPRESS
$382.50
$382.50
ROYAL GLOBE TRAVEL INC.
CONF AIRFARE-DUMOVICH
$242.50
$242.50
SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS, IN
SUPPLIES
$244.00
$244.00
SPECIALTY VEHICLE SERVICE
REPAIRS
$1,174.02
$1,174.02
DENNIS THILL - F.D.
CONFERENCE EXPENSE
$575.00
$575.00
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBA
TRAINING
$30.00
$30.00
PAUL VALENTINE
EXPENSES
$24.00
$24.00
WAUKEGAN FIRE DEPARTMENT
TRNG REG-DUMOVICH, MALCOLM
$510.00
$510.00
XEROX CORP.
SERVICE & PARTS
$112.00
$112.00
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
***TOTAL**
$15,316.86
GENERAL FUND
$11,944.31 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
FUND
$3,372.55
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31191
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SERVICES RENDERED FEBRUARY
GENERAL FUND $28,299.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
ARVEY PAPER & SUPPLIES
BADE PAPER PRODUCTS
LEONARD W. BAZAN
DARYL BOYD
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
F. A. DAVIS COMPANY
MICHAEL DOROSH
ELK GROVE TAXI
JUDY FELL
HAZEL FRICKE
CAROLYN HENDERSON
BILL HESS
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LISA LEVIN
RAY LUNDIN
EARLE MATTSON
MAYO CLINIC HEALTH LETTER
NANCY MORGAN
MOSBY-YEAR BOOK
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PAGE 17
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$28,299.00 $28,299.00
***TOTAL** $28,299.00
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$303.15
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$804.45
$1,107.60
SUPPLIES
$62.11
$62.11
SUPPLIES
$39.00
$39.00
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$21.00
$21.00
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
SEMINAR REFRESHMENTS
$51.03
$51.03
MEDICAL DICTIONARY
$23.95
$23.95
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$32.60
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$19.25
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
$50.60
$102.45
SUPPLIES
$58.80
$58.80
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$3.00
$3.0�
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$3.00
$3.0
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
SERVICE
$32.18
$32.18
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$3.00
$3.00
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$33.00
$33.00
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$15.00
$15.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$24.00
$24.00
REIMB-INTERNSHIP PROGRAM
$85.00
$85.00
PUBLICATIONS
$64.40
$64.40
SUPPLIES
$19.87
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CHICAGO MESSENGER SERVICE INC.
HIGHLAND SHOP AT HOME SERVICES
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
JOHN L. PRIOLA
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
SEMINAR CLEMENTS, FRITZ, SIMS
MESSENGER SERVICE
CDBG-1715 PARK DRIVE
LEGAL
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
FACADE IMP 620 E NW HWY
DELIVERY
SERVICES RENDERED
$60.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$26.70
PAGE 18
$3,336.00
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$93.80
$93.80
$17.70
PAYMENT DATE 1%31191
$6.98
$24.68*
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
$1,250.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$34.88
$54.75
NURSING 91
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$28.95
$28.95
ORYX
PUBLICATION
$22.50
$22.50
BILL PAINE
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
RELIABLE FIRE EQUIPMENT COMPAN
SMOKE DETECTORS
$171.45
$171.45
OTTO SCHERR
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
SELF-HELP CENTER
SUBSCRIPTION
$48.00
$48.00
JEANNE SHERMAN
DEC DRIVER REIMB,
$6.00
$6.00
SPRINGHOUSE BOOK CO.
PUBLICATION
$19.30
$19.30
BERTHA STEIL
DEC 'DRIVER REIMB
$12.00
$12.00
KATHI WESLEY
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
HELEN WHITLOCK
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$6.00
$6.00
VIRGINIA ZITO
DEC DRIVER REIMB
$9.00
$9.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$2,166.47
GENERAL FUND
$2,166.47
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CHICAGO MESSENGER SERVICE INC.
HIGHLAND SHOP AT HOME SERVICES
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
JOHN L. PRIOLA
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
SEMINAR CLEMENTS, FRITZ, SIMS
MESSENGER SERVICE
CDBG-1715 PARK DRIVE
LEGAL
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
FACADE IMP 620 E NW HWY
DELIVERY
SERVICES RENDERED
$60.00
$60.00°
$26.70
$26.7(
$3,336.00
$3,336.00
$93.80
$93.80
$17.70
$6.98
$24.68*
$5,000.00
$5,000.00
$23.60
$23.60
$1,250.00
$1,250.00
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $9,814.78
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31191
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $5,101.30 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $4,713.48
********************************************************************************************************
STREET DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
BLDG SUPPLIES DEC
90
$27.70
BLDG SUPPLIES DEC
90
$36.52
BLDG SUPPLIES DEC
90
$10.89
BLDG SUPPLIES DEC
90
$37.81
BLDG SUPPLIES
$16.31
SUPPLIES
$10.94
$140.17
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
$201.71
$72.78
$274.49
AKZO SALT INC.
RAOD SALT
$4,029.60
ROAD SALT
$1,145.57
ROAD SALT
$375.17
ROAD SALT
$988.45
ROAD SALT
$4,087.92
ROAD SALT
$1,543.13
ROAD SALT
$1,546.70
ROAD SALT
$2,041.61
ROAD SALT
$502.96
ROAD SALT
$3,104.63
$19,365.74
AM= -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
CLNG SUPPLIES
$278.91
$278.91
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
SUPPLIES
$324.40
SUPPLIES
$166.29
SUPPLIES
$158.34
SUPPLIES
$176.28
$825.31
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY
UNIFORM SERVICE
$75.59
$75.59
AMP PRODUCTS CORPORATION
MTCE SUPPLIES
$109.70
$109.70
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS
KEYS
$15.00
$30.00
$45.00
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
PARTS
$723.09
PARTS
$104.70
$827.79
GEORGE BARTNICKI
CONTRACTUAL SNOW
REMOVAL
$97.00
$97.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
GW BERKHEIMER CO., INC.
PARTS
$43.24
$43.24
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$65.00
SUPPLIES
$130.00
$195.00
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
SUPPLIES
$74.79
MICE SUPPLIES
$113.10
$187.89
BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO.
REPAIRS
$62.25
$62.25
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
VEHICLE WASH
$62.50
$62.5('
BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS
FLOWERS-SCHWEIGER
$45.00
$45.OG
CADE INDUSTRIES
CLNG SUPPLIES
$672.20
SUPPLIES
$189.90
SUPPLIES
$189.90
SUPPLIES
$189.90
SUPPLIES
$189.90
SUPPLIES
$189.90
CLNG SUPPLIES
$65.70
$1,687.40
CECO DOOR DIVISION
SUPPLIES
$118.26
$118.26
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
MICE SUPPLIES
$673.31
$673.31
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CLNG SUPPLIES
$22.85
CLNG SUPPLIES
$114.00
CLNG SUPPLIES
$120.84
CLNG SUPPLIES
$123.90
CLNG SUPPLIES
$38.40
CLNG SUPPLIES
$108.20
CUSTODIAL SUPPLIES
$56.40'
$584.59
CHICAGO CLOCK CO., INC.
KIEMZLE CLOCK
$30.00
$30.00 -
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
SERVICE
$78.88
$78.8;
ROBERT CLARK
CLNG SUPPLIES
$22.66
$22.66
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
JANITORIAL SERVICE
$2,076.00
$2,076.00
THOMAS CRAMER
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
$75.00
$75.00
MIKE DOMINICK
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
$78.00
SNOW REMOVAL
$181.00
$259.00
DOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
OVERHEAD DOOR REPAIR
$3,370.00
$3,370.00
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
TIRE REPAIR
$15.00
$15.00
ELKIN MANUFACTURING
EQUIPMENT
$2,845.00
$2,845.00
RAY ENDRE
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
$87.50
$87.50
ENGINEMASTERS, INC.
PARTS
$1,671.99
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
ENGRAVING WORLD
MARK FEDOR
FINISHMASTER, INC.
EARL FINNEY
FLUIDLINE
FORBES INCORPORATED
PEDRO FORTE
G & K SERVICES, INC.
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
DAVE GUZZARDO
JOHN HANSON
HELLER LUMBER CO.
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER,
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBOR
NELS J. JOHNSON
JIM KANE
LAND AND LAKES CO
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MICE SUPPLIES
$24.0.20
MTCE SUPPLIES
$230.00
$2,142.19
SIGN
$7.86
$7.86
SNOW REMOVAL
$55.00
$55.00
SUPPLIES
$54.52
SUPPLIES
$41.04
SUPPLIES
$111.70
SUPPLIES
$70.40
$277.6 .
REIMB SAFETY SHOES
$42.75
$42.75
MTCE SUPPLIES
$101.60
$101.60
ELECTRICAL WORK
$566.60
$566.60
SNOW REMOVAL
$115.00
$115.00
UNIFORM SERVICE
$172.95
UNIFORM SERVICE
$150.03
UNIFORM SERVICE
$1,050.00
$1,372.98
SUPPLIES
$145.79
SUPPLIES
$328.00
SUPPLIES
$8.82
SUPPLIES
$14.90
SUPPLIES
$7.89-
$489.62
MTCE SUPPLIES
$248.92
$248.92
SUPPLIES
$133.24
$133.24
SNOW REMOVAL
$98.00
$98.00
SNOW REMOVAL
$84.00
$84.00
SUPPLIES
$371.20
$371.2
SERVICE
$79.86
$79.8
SUPPLIES
$415.40
$415.40
FORESTRY.TAPES
$50.00
$50.00
REPAIR TREE
$365.00
$365.00
SNOW REMOVAL
$70.00
$70.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$110.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$500.00
$610.00
CAR RENTAL
$255.26
CAR RENTAL
$1,142.72
PARTS -DECEMBER
$395.35
$1,793.33
LEAF MACHINE REPAIR PARTS
$1,859.00
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
ROGER MEYER
MIDWEST TURF AND TRACTOR
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
ROSS NOVY
KEVIN O'NEAL
ANTHONY PAGANO
MIKE PETROW
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
LEAF MACHINE REPAIR PARTS
SUPPLIES
SNOW HAULING
MATERIAL REMOVAL & HAULING
MATERIAL REMOVAL & HAULING
MATERIAL, REMOVAL & HAULING
EQUIPMENT
PLAQUE
PARTS
PARTS -DECEMBER 90
HVAC REPAIRS
1830E KENSINGTON
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
SNOW REMOVAL
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
SNOW REMOVAL
SNOW REMOVAL
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
MTG SUPPLIES -TRAVEL
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$265.55
$59.85
$2,116.00
$2,815.00
$210.00
$934.00
$1,500.00
$39.97
$35.00
$228.67
$828.00
$797.22
$4.22
$142.41
$26.62
$14.66
$121.34
$53.53
$22.00
$9.32
$9.08
$84.50
$149.00
$267.50
$235.00
$60.00
$95.00
$17.12
$35.51
$19.88
$27.52
$9.79
$59.47
$36.00
$87.44
$24.33
PAGE 22
TOTAL
$2,124.55
$59.85
$6,075.00
$1,500.00
$39.9,
$35.00
$228.67
$828.00
$797.22
$384.78
$18.40
$233.50
$502.50
$60.0(
$95.00
*
$72.51*
U 1 -on
STREET DIVISION
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
DAN RIIS
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
ROADWAY SIGNAL AND LIGHTING MA
SAUBER MFG. CO.
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
AL SCHWANDT
AUDREY SCHWEIGER
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
SENTRY MAINTENANCE
PAUL SEPANIAK
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
SPRING ALIGN
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
STATE TREASURER
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
SNOW REMOVAL
MTCE SUPPLIES
STORM WATER STUDY
SERVICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REIMB-SAFETY SHOES
CONTRACTUAL SNOW REMOVAL
SNOW REMOVAL
SIGN SHOP TOOLS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SNOW REMOVAL
PEST CONTROL JANUARY
PEST CONTROL JANUARY
PEST CONTROL JANUARY
PEST CONTROL JANUARY
PEST CONTROL JANUARY
SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
PLBG SUPPLIES
PLBG SUPPLIES
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
33 1/3$ MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
50% MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
50% MTCE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
INVOICE AMOUNT
$19.00
$20.94
$58.77
$8.35
$44.00
$33.59
$353.10
$105.95
$432.60
$127.50
$622.23
$115.24
$53.80
$15.88
$54.25
$48.14
$111.50
$119.00
$127.87
$149.35
$149.35
$60.00
$48.00
$48.00
$48.00
$48.00
$48.00
$138.25
$80.00
$352.50
$136.13
$29.99
$79.20
$177.59
$313.05
$437.85
PAGE 23
TOTAL
*
*
*
*
$395.61*
$386.6
$538.55
$127.50
$622.23
$115.24
$53.80
$15.88
$54.25
$48.14
$230.50
$127.87
$298.70
$60.00
$240.00
$138.25
$432.50
$166.12
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
TCI OF ILLINOIS
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
PETER VANDEN BRADEN
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
WOOD ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTION I
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31%91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
25% MICE TRAFFIC SIGNALS
$73.33
$1,081.02
CABLE -PUBLIC WORKS
$9.50
$9.50
SUPPLIES
$36.82
SUPPLIES
$18.92
$55.74
SNOW REMOVAL
$115.50
$115.50
101 S MAPLE ST
$47.50
$47.50
PLOW BLADES
$1,556.64
$1,556.6r
SERVICES RENDERED
$975.00
$975.01.
WINDOW CLNG SERVICE
$125.25
$201.72
WINDOW CLNG SERVICE
$125.25
PARTS
WINDOW CLNG SERVICE
$125.25
$375.75
$36,260.46 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$7,715.00
***TOTAL** $65,371.82
$21,396.36
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
A-1 TIME RECORDER CO. INC.
SUPPLIES
$84.45
$84.45
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
BLDG SUPPLIES DEC 90
$182.46
BLDG SUPPLIES DEC 90
$40.59
BLDG SUPPLIES DEC 90
$38.32
$261.37
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$120.33
PARTS
$49.74
PARTS
$201.72
PARTS
$72.78
$444.57
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY
UNIFORM SERVICE
$75.58
$75.58
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$100.00
$100.00
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSN.
1991 SAFETY TALKS
$21.30
$21.30
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$61.51
$61.51
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
PARTS
$194.69
$194.69
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 25
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1131/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ARROW EQUIPMENT CO.
SUPPLIES
$13.14
$13.14
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
SERVICES RENDERED
$202.20
SERVICES RENDERED
$370.00
$572.20
BLACK & DECKER
REPAIRS
$45.00
$45.00
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$1,486.34
SUPPLIES
$141.31
SUPPLIES
$275.60
SUPPLIES
$60.00
SUPPLIES
$130.00
$2,093.25
BUSSE CAR WASH, INC.
VEHICLE WASH
$42.50
$42.50
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$660.00
SUPPLIES
$104.00
$764.00
JOSE CASTRO
REIMBURSE LICENSE
$40.00
$40.00
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
SERVICE
$70.74
$70.74
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
MICE SUPPLIES
$673.31
$673.31
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CLNG SUPPLIES
$108.20
CLNG SUPPLIES
$238.70
$346.90
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BJ80-JT-23598
$3,841.19
$3,841.19
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH67-JT-1310-A
$42.84
$42.84
VINCENT DIVITO, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$161,034.30
$161,034.30
E & H UTILITY SALES
SUPPLIES
$1,878.75
$1,878.75
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
PRIORITY BOX
$46.25
$46.25
THE FILM LIBRARY
SAFETY FILM
$81.00
$81.00
FINISHMASTER, INC.
SUPPLIES
$54.52
SUPPLIES
$19.90
SUPPLIES
$21.96
$96.39
FLETCHER ENGINEERING COMPANY
CITIZENS UTILITIES STUDY
$10,000.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$9,500.00
$19,500.00
G & K SERVICES, INC.
UNIFORM SERVICE
$172.95
UNIFORM SERVICE
$150.02
UNIFORM SERVICE
$1,050.00
$1,372.97
GATEWAY SUPPLY CO.
PLBG SUPPLIES
$181-.92
$181.92
GLENBROOK EXCAVATING
SERVICES RENDERED
$14,454.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$45,726.30
$60,180.30
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
SUPPLIES
$26.70
SUPPLIES
$5.90
$32.60
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
GRAPHIC CONTROLS
SUPPLIES
$120.87
$120.87
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
METER EXCNANGE
$34.38
METER EXCHANGE
$34.38
$68.76
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MICE COMPUTERS & PRINTER
$194.00
MICE AGREEMENT
$100.43
MTCE COMPUTER & PRINTER
$52.00
$346.43
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$203.83
SERVICE
$533.12
SERVICE
$37.04
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$30.63
SERVICE
$61.25
SERVICE
$97.32
SERVICE
$18.58
SERVICE
$17.07
SERVICE
$24.54
SERVICE
$19.80
SERVICE
$17.43
SERVICE
$17.49
$1,139.36
INDEPENDENT MECHANICAL IND.
PUMP MODIFICATION
$16,119.00
$16,119.00
INDUSTRIAL STEEL SERV. CENTER,
SUPPLIES
$415.40
$415.40
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
$688.00
$688.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET, INC.
PARTS -DECEMBER
$364.23
$364.23
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$18.90
SUPPLIES
_$5.90
$24.8(
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$77.29
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$10.38
$87.67
AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION
SERVICES RENDERED
$506.25
$506.25
MID CENTRAL WATER WORKS ASSOC.
DUES -MC INTOSH
$30.00
$30.00
MID -WEST METER CO., INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$7.20
$7.20
MJB TOOLS
MTCE SUPPLIES
$34.55
$34.55
EMIL MOELLEN KAMP
SERVICES RENDERED
$250.00
$250.00
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
PARTS
$35.00
$35.00
MOTOROLA, INC.
REPAIR RADIO
$112.50
$112.50
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
PARTS -DECEMBER 90
$299.82
$299.82
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 27
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1%31191
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SER
QUARTERLY SVC CHG
$25.00
$25.00
NET MIDWEST, INC.
DEC 90 WATER SAMPLES
$115.00
$115.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NS E KENSINGTON lE RAND
$86.78
112 E HIGHLAND AVE EMERSON
$243.71
$330.49
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
PARTS
$39.08
$39.08
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$16.80
$16.80-
16.80PETTY
PETTYCASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$.85
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$80.91
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$.45
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$153.75
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$9.24
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$25.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$6.60
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$45.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$7.46
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$4.12
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$9.57
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.43
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.85
$348.28*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
MTCE SUPPLIES
$97.70
$97.70
POSTMASTER
WATER BILL POSTAGE
$684.42
$684.42*
QUALITY AUTO PARTS ON CENTRAL
PARTS
$432.60
$432.60
QUALITY RESTORATIONS, INC.
REPL BOOSTER PUMP
$9,900.00
$9,900.00
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
PRINTING CHGS
$148.00
$148.00
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
MICE SUPPLIES
$622.23
$622.23(
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
STORM WATER STUDY
$115.24
$115.241.
SAUBER MFG. CO.
SUPPLIES
$15.87
$15.87
SEARS
MTCE SUPPLIES
$221.54
$221.54
SPRING ALIGN
MTCE SUPPLIES
$474.44
MTCE SUPPLIES
$32.00
$506.44
WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FED.
MEMBERSHIP-ANDLER
$89.00
$89.00
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
PLOW BLADES
$1,415.02
PLOW BLADES
$134.98
$1,550.00
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
MTCE SUPPLIES
$85.50
MTCE SUPPLIES
$173.85
MTCE SUPPLIES
$190.55
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A $18.30
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
BH66-JT-3710-A
BH66-JT-5262-A
BH66-JT-5266-C'
BH68-JT-7498-A
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
WINDOW CLNG'SERVICE
$442.73
$7.68
$145.82
$122.38
$18.30 $312.48
$5.00 $5.00
$125.25 $125.25
***TOTAL** $442.73
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHARGE $8,091.00 $8,091.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $8,091.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 28
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
MICE SUPPLIES
$99.80
$549.70
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$290,650.24
WATER & SEWER FUND
$290,650.24
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A $18.30
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
BH66-JT-3710-A
BH66-JT-5262-A
BH66-JT-5266-C'
BH68-JT-7498-A
19 E NORTHWEST HWY
WINDOW CLNG'SERVICE
$442.73
$7.68
$145.82
$122.38
$18.30 $312.48
$5.00 $5.00
$125.25 $125.25
***TOTAL** $442.73
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHARGE $8,091.00 $8,091.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $8,091.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 29
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $8,091.00
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HOUS
CENTURY TILE SUPPLY COMPANY
CHICAGO TURF & IRRIGATION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COURTESY HOME CENTER
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
HELLER LUMBER CO.
HELM, INC.
MIDWEST TURF AND TRACTOR
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI
REGION 5 SALES & SERVICE, INC.
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN
WOLF AND COMPANY
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
HOSE & FITTINGS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
BLDG INPROVEMENT SUPPLIES
EQUIPMENT
ELECTRICAL INSTALLATION
DRYWALL
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
MANUALS
EQUIPMENT
101 S. MAPLE RESTORATION
EQUIPMENT
ELECTRIC HYDRAULIC VALVE
SERVICES RENDERED
$471.95
$337.26
$14.48
$407.80
$3,000.00
$292.54
$27.52
$11.75
$23.13
$83.50
$1,766.44
$1,563.00
$99.95
$1,219.47
$500.00
***TOTAL**
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND $6,541.36 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 $500.00
$471.95r
$351.741
$407.80
$3,000.00*
$292.54*
$27.52
$11.75
$23.13
$83.50
$1,766.44
$1,563.00
$99.95
$1,219.47
$500.00
$9,818.79
$2,777.43
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
BG21-JT-1838-A
BH67-JT-3858-B
BUDGET ALLOCATION
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$52.91
$11.01 $63.92
$2,875.00 $2,875.00
$8.00 $8.00
VENDOR
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
WORLD WINDOW CLEANING CO
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1/31/91
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
WINDOW CLNG SERVICE
GENERAL FUND $3,117.92
PAGE 30
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$17.1.00 $171.00
***TOTAL** $3,117.92
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK BOND TRANSFER FEES $209.00
BOND TRANSFER FEES $270.00 $479.00
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS ***TOTAL** $479.00
P W FACILITY B & 11987B $209.00 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 19870 $270.00
********************************************************************************************************
PENSION FUNDS
FINANCIAL & ECON. STRATEGIES CONSULTING SERVICES 1/91-3/91 $1,500.00 x
CONSULTING SERVICES 1/91-3/91 $1,500.00 $3,000.00*
ILL. POLICE PENSION FUND ASSN. ANNUAL DUES $500.00 $500.00*
PENSION FUNDS ***TOTAL** $3,500.00
POLICE PENSION FUND
$2,000.00 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$1,500.00
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $1,342,386.05
DATE RUN 1/31191
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TIME RUN 11.02.12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING
SUMMARY BY FUND 1/31191
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$532,205.46
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$21,396.36
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$6,010.76
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$22,891.25
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$336,585.88
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,449.22
48
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND
$6,541.36
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$262,607.26
51
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND
$13,925.58
55
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
$500.00
68
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & I 1987D
$14,439.50
69
P W FACILITY B & I 1987B
$209.00
70
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B & 11987C
$14,862.75
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$42,267.41
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$43,512.70
73
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$3,883.56
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$19,098.00
TOTAL
ALL FUNDS
$1;342,386.05
PAGE 31
ID-APPBAR
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT-
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990
SUBJECT: ZBA-93-SU-90, TERENCE E. FREDIANI
LOCATION: 2218 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD (ROSENOW INDUSTRIAL PARK)
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a request for an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 filed by Terence Frediani.
The application was filed to allow a car wash in Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit
Development and to allow a front yard setback of 10 feet rather than the 30 foot front yard
established for the P.U.D.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At the
meeting, Mr. Frediani presented testimony in support of the request. He described the
proposed facility stating that this was intended to be the "flag ship" for the franchise. As
such, great attention would be given to the exterior design and landscaping.
Rich Spedoni, Spot -Not franchise manager, explained that the typical franchise hours of
operation are from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily, but they would prefer to be open 24 hours
at this location. The facility would be manned from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. He further
discussed the typical customer volume, peak hours, and price structure of services offered.
Tom Coutre, owner/operator of National Pride Car Wash, 2000 South Elmhurst Road,
expressed concern about the need for another car wash in the area. He felt that another
car wash in the area would adversely affect his and other auto -oriented businesses in the
area. Tom Kropika, owner/operator of Tom's Auto Body, 2000 South Elmhrust Road
expressed similar concerns.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that staff has some concerns with the proposal relative
to traffic impacts and site constraints. However, staff's primary concern is that a car wash
is not consistent with the original intent to develop the P.U.D. with small lot industrial uses.
While staff prefers an industrial use on this lot, the proposed car wash is generally
compatible with the mixed use character of South Busse Road.
The Zoning Board discussed the request deliberating over the issue of the market feasibility.
The majority of members felt that the Zoning Code is not intended to shelter or protect
individual businesses. In addition, the proposed use is less obnoxious and intense than other
uses permitted in the I-1 Zoning District. It is also compatible with existing surrounding
development.
Accordingly, by a 5-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the request to amend Special Use Ordinance #4180 to allow a car wash and
10 foot front yard setback on Lot #5 in the Rosenow Industrial P.U.D.
t
t_
f
- � +ao . � +'xi x. r. f4tlA 0[tfNTNN Allo
i }
d � Y
w
– ft—vt a ti -4 {
–It --FC OW..41.47 a
.. hO A.—O. I .- -,I-
TMI
IJ
�i>ba
� � - w >?•.e-.�...e® � ��-. w�+.-.r...w� -.;, s+>r s r
t b+'. ".r`�"-. � � � � �-
•
F5
ii
{i
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 93 -SU -90
Hearing Date: December 13, 1990
PETITIONER:
Terence E. Frediani
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
2218 S. Busse Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
November 27, 1990
REQUEST:
An amendment to Special Use
Ordinance #4180 to allow a car
wash in the Rosenow Industrial
Planned Unit Development. The
proposed development will also
require an amendment to the
setback requirements established
for the P.U.D. to allow a 10'
front yard rather than the 30'
front yard required.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED
PARTIES: Thomas Co.utre, 2000 S. Elmhurst
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner
is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 to
allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit
Development. The proposed development will also require an
amendment to the setback requirements established for the
P.U.D. to allow a 10' front yard rather than the 30' front
yard required.
The petitioner, Terence Frediani, 1705 Frediani Ct.,
presented his case stating that he would like to open a car
wash at 2218 S. Busse Rd. Mr. Frediani continued by stating
he has been in the Village of Mount Prospect for 37 years
and would like to keep his business here. Mr. Frediani stated
that the Special Use would be for a small driveway located on
the east side of the proposed property. Mr. Frediani also
stated that the site would be very open with visually
pleasing and extensive landscaping. Mr. Frediani then noted
that the building height would be well under the requirement
for the Village. Mr. Frediani stated that the proposed car
wash would
be, a positive and us
the surrounding area
Mr. Rich Spidoni, of
are 22 existing Spot
in Tinley park. Mr.
wash is about a 1 mi
Spidoni stated that
and afterwork betwee
questioned the hours
the hours would be f
would like this to b
stated that the prop
Rd. and would have a
Basnik questioned ho
Mr. Spidoni estimate
a week.
Julie Farnham, Plann
noted that there wou
self serve type of c
has concerns with tr
car wash was not wit
small lot industrial
start stacking up on
would probably stack
onto Busse Road. Mr.
are on the property?
is the only other bu
proposal is currentl
Thomas Coutre, Natic
stated concerns for
that he has owned tt
feel the Village of
wash. Mr. Coutre fee
loss noting that the
within a 1 mile radi
a chart showing the
if another car wash
against the proposes
Tom Cropika, Tom's E
gets a lot of busin(
owned by Mr. Coutre,
wash would directly
Mr. Frediani stated
his proposed car wa4
seiry
t -Not
-Car
oni a
rom t
peak
O'clo
,the c
7 * 00
24 ho
buil
ing a
,ny ca
cars
* col
* in:
a. M:
se Ro
the i
ssid;
a Fa:
ng t]
the
e
in.
was
Body
Fnnlh
act him.
t National
He is ,goir
ZB
would be
tise, stat
in the ar
Lted that
)osed car
could be o
7 o'clock
i. Mr. Spi
10:00 P.
wash. Mr
)uld not b
)r 35 cars
ty they ex
which wou
age of Mot
bays and
arnham stE
Miss Farr
X.D. plar
owron ask(
iss FarnhE
road befoi
if any of
tated thal
w, but at
ng stages,
ash, 2200
* wash. Mi
* car was]
does not j
rience pei
-ashes on I
ash. Mr. I
I losses h,
,utre stati
Prospect,
Aonal Pril
r in busin,
lar Wash i;
into the '
-SU-90
3r 13, 1990
of 3
rading for
hat there
the closest
nearest car
. Mr.
e weekends
Lannon
stated that
ut they
idoni also
cing Busse
airman
e about 500
rospect,
would be a
the staff
noted the
develop
cars would
ated they
erflowing
developments
Warehouse
t one other
lmhurst Rd.,
etre stated
,ce 1986 and
another car
.1 economic
first Road and
-e presented
:ht incur
� is totally
�d that he
Lr Wash
,'or the car
miles from
tess for
ZBA-93-SU-90
December 13, 1990
Page 3 of 3
profit and feels the competition factor irrelevant to his
case. Mr. Spidoni noted that the Spot -Not Franchise relies on
advertisement and market evalutation.
The Board then generally discussed the case. The Board
discussed Mr. Coutre's concerns about market saturation and
competition. Mr. Lannon stated that the Zoning Ordinance
should not be used to shelter or protect businesses from free
market competition. Chairman Basnik disagreed, stating that
zoning has a direct impact on the market. He felt that in
this situation, since the property is zoned I-1 and the
P.U.D. was originally intended for I-1 uses, a commercial use
would not be appropriate. Mr. Lannon stated that the primary
issue relates to the appropriateness of the use in this
location, not its market feasibility. Mr. Brettrager stated
that this use is not offensive to the area and feels it would
be beneficial for the people who live in apartments just to
the north of the proposed area. Mr. Cassidy agreed with Mr.
Brettrager. Chairman Basnik questioned if the Village needs
another Car wash. Mr. Lannon stated it would not adversely
affect the area.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for an amendment to Special Use # 4180 to
allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit
Development.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron
NAYS: Basnik
Motion carried by a vote of 5-1.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VL—AGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIIC, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1990
CASE NO.: ZBA-93-SU-90
APPLICANT: TERENCE E. FREDIANI
ADDRESS: 2218 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD (ROSENOW INDUSTRIAL PARK)
LOCATION MAP:
---Rx
•
R X
%7
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: I-1(Light Industrial)
LOT SIZE: 49,630 st (1.14 Acres) = 13.9% of total PUD
% COVERAGE: 49.5%
FAX: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQUE
rr •
r • r •• r,r wl rallow
1 / r
P11
,r r M. , rrrl"1 1° r rr• .� r, rr
1 1MOO r..r 1: II . 1 r♦ 1 1 r .. r
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a car wash on Lot 5 in the
Rosenow Industrial Park. Because car washes are not a permitted use in the I-1 District,
the P.U.D. must be amended to allow this use. The Zoning Ordinance under Section
14.2503.8 allows the Zoning Board of Appeals to recommend authorizing uses within the
Planned Unit Developments that otherwise are not allowed under the use regulations of the
corresponding zoning district, if the proposed use satisfactorily meets the Special Use
standards listed in the Ordinance.
The car wash will consist of eight drive-thru service bays and four vacuum islands. Stacking
for 3-5 cars will be provided for each bay. In addition, four on-site parking spaces will be
provided for employee and customer use.
A front yard variance is requested to accommodate a drive accessing the two eastern -most
bays. The drive encroaches into the 30 foot front yard setback. A 10 foot landscaped strip
will remain.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The Industrial Park contains five
lots, only one of which is currently developed. The car wash will be located, on Lot #5
which is the lot closest to Busse Road. J & L Warehouse occupies the lot directly north
of the proposed car wash. A proposal is currently in the planning stages for another
warehouse facility at the end of the cul-de-sac. The property directly to the south is zoned
R -X. Given its location between the Industrial Park and the I-90 Expressway, it is unlikely
that it will be developed for residential use.
The Zoning Ordinance does not permit car washes in I-1 Zoning Districts. However, the
use is no more obnoxious than other uses permitted under 1-1 Zoning. The proposed site
plan includes a significant amount of landscaping, especially along the road accessing the
entire PUD.
The proposed use is more commercial in nature than other uses permitted in the 1.1
District. Consequently, 'it might generate more short-term (customer) traffic than the other
uses in the PUD. It is likely however, that peak customer volume will occur on weekends
when other industrial/warehouse uses typically do not generate traffic. The applicant should
discuss the anticipated traffic volume that the car wash will generate.
Except for some concerns about potential traffic conflicts, staff does not feel this use is
incompatible with the character of the Industrial Park. However, this industrial PUD was
only recently approved, and done so based on testimony from the owner that the five -lot
industrial park was being created to meet an existing market condition for small industrial
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
lots. The proposed car wash is a move away from the original design of the industrial park.
This type of small industrial development is desirable because it crates an area where
similar uses can locate, expanding the industrial and employment base of the Village. A
service use, such as a car wash, may not be inappropriate, but its location reduces industrial
opportunity. The property owner should provide testimony as to his marketing plans for the
remaining lots, and the advantages of locating a car wash in the industrial park.
Staff notes that on-site detention may have to be modified as a result of this plan. The
engineering plans for the entire five -lot industrial subdivision indicate that the northern 66
feet of this lot are part of a shared detention area. In this area, the finished grade elevation
cannot exceed 680.8 feet. The landscaped berms may have to be eliminated to
accommodate required detention capacity. Another option might be to grade the paved
area appropriately to expand the detention area to the south... essentially transferring the
detention capacity of the bermed areas to another location. However, these issues must be
resolved in the detail site design stage and do not have a direct bearing on the proposed
amendments.
Other staff comments relate to issues that must be addressed in the detail site design.
These include:
-The site grading must accommodate the required detention as previously noted.
-The development of this lot (#5) and the adjacent lot (#4) will require the extension
of a 12" watermain through both lots to connect to a main in Busse Road.
-Some proposed hydrant locations may require relocation as determined by the Fire
Prevention Bureau.
SUMMARYIRECOMMENDATION
Staff believes that an industrial user would be better for this lot, but does not find the car
wash objectionable considering the character of South Busse Road. The applicant should
demonstrate that the proposed use meets the Special Use standards, particularly the
anticipated traffic volume the car wash will generate. As stated earlier, the property owner
should discuss his marketing plan for the remaining industrial lots, and any advantages the
car wash provides.
Staff also notes that the detail site design may result in modifications to the present site
plan. However, these modifications do not have a direct bearing on the requested
amendment and the final site and landscaping plans must be approved by staff.'
DMC:hg
CAF/
1/9/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4180
GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2200 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
WHEREAS, Terence E. Frediani (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend Ordinance No. 4180, being
an Ordinance authorizing a Special Use in the nature of a Planned
Unit Development with respect to property commonly known as 2218
South Busse Road (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property)
and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 5 in Busse Road Subdivision, being a subdivision in the
East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook
County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to Ordinance No. 4180 to
allow a self -serve car wash, pursuant to Section 14.2503.B, and to
permit a front yard setback of ten feet (101) for an access drive,
rather than the 301 required; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 93 -SU -90) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of
December, 1990, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 27th day of November,
1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the
following Ordinance regarding the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE:. That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That SECTION THREE of Ordinance No. 4180 entitled "An
Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 3656 and Granting a Special Use
in the Nature of a Planned Unit Development for Property Commonly
Known as 2200 South Busse Road" is hereby amended to permit the
operation of a self-service car wash as a permitted use exception
in the Planned Unit Development, and to amend item number 3 in
SECTION FOUR to permit for a ten foot (101) front yard for a
portion of the subject property to provide for an access road, as
noted on the site plan attached hereto and hereby made a part of
as Exhibit 11111
ZBA 93 -SU -90
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: I This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
m
m
j
�} Itl1
}/l ,.., '2� i1.�4 �t4 I•t� Y}Yt! IliiiMilF }}F} t #
i M
�
#
Yt��.s
iii wry
tet" "�•.4
li
M.}• s+k
t�`� {�,
-it',.
,
P++-fl°�'t�.rs.+��•af -X
R rYI".°K"a'°'S$'i� t
r
{
a3
t �3
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER 0T_
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990
SUBJECT: zBA.94-SU-90, ZBA-95-V-90, YUN WOOK YI
LOCATION: 812 SOUTH DEBORAH LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for a Special Use permit and variance filed by Yun Wook Yi. The
application was filed to allow construction of a three -car garage and a 34 foot wide driveway
at 812 South Deborah Lane. The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires Special Use
permits for three -car garages and allows driveway widths up to 21 feet.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At the
meeting, Mr. Yun presented testimony in support of the request. No objectors were present
in the audience.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that three -car garages are a common feature of newer,
large single family homes in the surrounding neighborhood. She also noted that this lot is
substantially larger than the minimum standard, and all proposed setbacks meet or exceed
Code requirements.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting the large size of lot and ample
setbacks.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the request for a Special Use Permit and variance to allow a three -car
garage and 34 foot wide driveway at 812 South Deborah Lane.
DMC:hg
A,
oe
c Sud' aCo.
913 I-wKOfY GtOve to Cary IL. 60417 - 706-516-2700
j
t tib
it r i �
0, —op"', JE5 n0 '1
Cl r, y Ik 41 r ,Y Jb ;'+ Yat"I 114
W E
nX7R 1^t 4I tf: Y YII
.ft 1I1 11
j
`IIIIIIII(/(` DEBORAH LN.
a.
� ..a• �1 75
1�
k� 11a+rri r'4 W-0 CAT, 1 9 y
t to 4.9' u Vtl 11, AI
f
a LOT
f137„ 75' 4� s
yi�J.. `i' I FJI State o1 .IIIIrtoi% )t $isle 01 IIIIndiS 1
Omer 0 ;/ ` County 0 MCHenry ), SS Co=y of McHenry ) SS
it
010.00 by t, Willam M. Tene(AlbI, an ilbrW�s Reg s10.80 Lam I, William M T0f18USCY', an Ill—S Registered LaM
Surveyor, 'dorareby nr7y mal I nave K Ied the SuvvM. 00 hereby Ceady mal Y have surveyed OW
Prof address
above shc}wn CNyltlg%r4s as of inns day above de—lbed Properly, and mat Bxs plat is a Correct
fro represeMafMOf SaI/SWVeyasditis �'}T daY
of 19
Distances ry m are feet and
decimal Pans mei ea `J Aegislered p.arr3 S+ IM rM
v nd cales km stake louxl IIIIII/((( „ Regialered LaM &r^4W # Z767
. • 11tlKdI6S e0f1 stake 5e1 Rehr l0 dealt p 1R6a,pot�C'i IOr arty bruifltp� li'Iea a
w r10 M'.+MIIY #Mk Pat rot ,ail .al an0-0 teal
YtdiCalas 1. last a
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 94 -SU -90 Hearing Date: December 13, 1990
95-V-90
PETITIONER: Yun Wook Yi
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 812 South Deborah Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: November 27, 1990
REQUEST: Special Use Permit to allow a
three -car garage per Section
14.1101.C.6. Also, a variation
from Section 14.3016.3 to allow
a 34' wide driveway.
ZBA MEMBER PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petioner is requestin a Special Use permit to allow
construation of a three -car garage. Concurrently a variation
is requested to Section 14.3016.3 to allow a 34' wide
driveway rather than the permitted 21' width.
The Petioner , Yun Wook Yi, 812 S. Deborah Ln. stated he
would like to construct a three -car garage and 34' driveway
on the proposed home he would like to construct.
Julie Farnham$ Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitoners request for the construction of a
three -car garage meet all setbacks, building height, lot
coverage and F.A.R. Miss Farnham stated that the proposed
home is larger than the surrounding homes on Deborah Lane
but the character matches many recently built on nearby
Kennicott Ct. Miss Farnham also stated that the petitioner
will reduce the driveway to 211 at the street and will be
responsible for repairs on the driveway due to utility work
if required in the easements.
The Board generally discussed the case and had no objections.
U-90
-90
13, 1990
f 2
he
w
ager,
he
3016.3 to
ager,
r "s
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECY
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
DECEMBER 7, 1990
CASE NO.:
ZBA-94-SU-90, ZBA-95-V-90
APPLICANT:
YUN WOOK YI
ADDRESS:
812 SOUTH DEBORAH LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 (Single Family Residential)
LOT SIZE: 18,045 st (137.75' x 131')
% COVERAGE: 43.6%
F.A-R.: 0.30
Gil Basnik, Chairman JijJ
Mount Prospect Zoning " and of Appeals Page 2
,J
REQUEST
The applicant is request" a Special Use Permit to allow const ction of a three -car garage
per Section 14.1101..C.6. ncurrently, a variation is requested to Section 14.3016.3 to allow
a 34 foot wide driveway ether than the permitted 21 foot 10ft.
Staff" notes that the appl'1 t also requested a ;variation to iallow a Floor Area Ratio
(FAR.) of 0.37 rather the 0.35 allowed.: The 0.37 FAR. was calculated based on the
gross house dimensions s on the site pian Upon receiptif detailed building plans, the
FAR. was reculated " ing precise dimension. The F �.. is actually 0.33, which is
within. the Code tate J ; and does not require a variation:' '
PLAhNNFAM tONCER M"
Summary of application:11 a applicant is proposing to cons6uet a large single family house
with an attached three -c ' (garage at 812 S. Deborah Lane The garage will be accessed by
a driveway that widens tfeet in front of ihhe three garage rs. All proposed setbacks
meet or exceed Village F e requirements.; The �building *fight is also within the 28 foot
height limitation for sin', family residential houses.
Surrounding Area morel �ment and Potential Impact: The immediate neighborhood along
Deborah Lane is charm erized by moderate-sized single family homes. However, new
developments of larger h es with three -car garages have occurred on Kennicott Court and
more recently have bee proposed for the, adjacent Par 41Subdivision. While three -car
garages may not be the rest on Deborah Lane, they are fairly common in the immediate
77
vicinity.
A 15 foot utility easem , exists along the; entire east property line. The utilities in the
easement will serve this t and the one directly to the south. As proposed, the driveway
will be constructed Wi the easement. The applicant shonll be aware that in the event
work is required in theasement, repairs to 'the drive ay are the property owner's
responsibility. {
The site plan alsoindfe a`" that the driveway approach a Out to match the 30 foot width
of an a sting opeaiing ° o Deborah Lane. 11iis additi paving is .not necessary for
automobile mane uve ' `� Staff suggests that the�driveway �e a maximum width of 21 feet
where it opens onto De ah Lane. 'This will minimize the potential for the driveway to be
misconstrued as an ext ion of the street..;. It will also redOt e the total paved area on the
lot by 150 square feet
fir# « .. #,w ##. N #. •. �, .. # ,, 6 � �' �. .. #_ . ..
where it abuts iey SU
hzfiiaiha
south end of the I- eE c be removed
• #. #Mtl
j%
U,. 61 i ,�
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
The proposed house is very large, as indicated by the lot coverage and F.A.R. being only
slightly below the maximum amounts allowed by Village Code. While it is substantially
larger than other homes on Deborah Lane, it is also on a much larger lot. The lot is at the
end of the cul-de-sac and the house will be set 40 feet back from the street. Staff notes that
this house is similar in character and size to homes built or proposed in adjacent
subdivisions. Three -car garages are becoming common features of these large houses,
likewise, most over -sized garages require driveways wider than 21 feet.
Staff does not have any major objections to this request, but suggests that approval of this
request be conditioned on reducing the driveway width to 21 feet where it connects to
Deborah Lane.
DMC:hg
CAF/
1/9/91
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND
VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS $12 DEBORAH LANE
WHEREAS, Yun Wook Yi (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for a variation and special use as provided
in Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for
property commonly known as 812 Deborah Lane (hereinafter referred
to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 2 in Shinjung Subdivision, being a Resubdivision of the
West Half (1/2) of that part of Lot 4 lying West of a line
that is 275.00 feet East of and parallel to the West line of
Lot 4 as measured on the North line thereof (excepting from
said part of Lot 4 and the North 475.0 feet thereof) in
Division of the Louis F. Busse Farm, being the Northeast
Quarter (1/4), except the West 686.40 feet of the Northwest
Quarter (1/4) of said Northeast Quarter (1/4) of Section 15
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, and except roads, according to Plat thereof
.registered in the office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook
County, Illinois on October 2, 1987 as Document Number
3656454;
11"fro
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to
allow a thirty-four foot (341) wide driveway at the garage entrance,
rather than the permitted 241 and a Special Use to permit a 3 -car
garage, as provided in Section 14.1101.C.6; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the requests being the subject
of ZBA 94 -SU -90 and ZBA 95-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of
the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of December, 1990,
pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount
Prospect Herald on the 27th day of November, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village have given further consideration to the requests herein and
have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in
Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the
Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests
of the Village to grant the requests as specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE. The, recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a special use
permit, as provided in Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a 3 -car garage.
and a variation to allow a thirty four foot (341) wide driveway at the
garage entrance. The driveway is to be no wider than twenty-one feet
(211) at the street.
SECTION THREE: Except for the special use and variation being the
subject of ZBA 94 -SU -90 and ZBA 95-V-90, all other applicable village
ZBA 94 -SU -90 & ZBA 95-V-90
Page 2 of 2
of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations shall remain in full
force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall
be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins
within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in
the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of -'—ount Prospect
Mout,Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: January 24, 1991
SUBJECT: Pavement Investigation
1991 Paving Program
Attached is a resolution authorizing the expenditure of $8,000
in Motor Fuel Tax funds. This resolution authorizes the village
to spend MFT funds for a pavement investigation project in
conjunction with the upcoming 1991 Resurfacing Program.
I recommend that this resolution be adopted at the Village
Board meeting on February 5, 1991.
Fred Tennyson/
I concur with the above recommendation
4 "r Albecker
1117 e ig u
Coordinator
I concur with the above recommendation
Chuck Bencic
Director of Inspection Services
FT/m
BE IT RESOLVED, by the
VILLAGE
City, Town or
that the following described a
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
1. That the proposed improvern
and be designated as Section
2. That there is hereby ap
improvement of said section from
3. That work shall be done by
Resolution for Improvement by Municipality Construction
Under the Illinois Highway Code
Council or President and Board of Trustees
of MOUNT PROSPECT
be improved under the Illinois Highway Code;
of the
ILLINOIS Illinois
Co-fsistof-A-1a43WmT? tr
T f.•
and shall be constructed feet wide
=51s=
the (additional) sum of -ZIGBT IHOUSAND AND... N,0100000000QOOO
Dollars ($ R 00-00 )forthe
municipality's allotment of Motor Fual Tax funds.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to tra
the district office of the Departmep of Transportation.
a.
APPROVED
19
Department of Transportation
District Engineer
BLR 4103 (Rev. 6/86)
IL 494-0352
;and,
Labor)
t two certified copies of this resolution to
)MIX
1,)WA CARC)JA A - VIELDS VJ-LLAGE-- Clerk
M rs. (City, Town, or Village)
inand for the VILLAGE of MQTINT PRQSPFrT
: (City, Town, or Village)
County of -Cooy, hereby certify the foregoing
to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by
the lCouncli or Pre-fRonl end rdaarv3 of Trgat,sal11 S
FEBRIIARY 55, 19 Q1
IN TESTIMONY' WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
day of A.D. 19—
(SEAL)
Clerk.
(City, Town, or Village)
GRANT
13USSE AVENUE
H E R E T 0 F 0 R E 0 E 0 I C A T E D
L
66'
EASEMENT PK0vj5j
TE OF ILLINOIS I S.S.
NTY OF COOK
"he Village of Mount Prospect does hereby certify that it is the Owner of part
e property described hereon and hereby grants easements as shown for the
.ruction, use and maintenance of utilities.
J this —day of , A.D. 199—.
41
CIMM091CALIM [DISIN Coo
oar
ILLI M5 54L
to*w V414ta'st
d Mur 4rt;j 4ft f 0M 0* �Li M4# w6d
k41Wt,.4 Of Mte04 /,, Mt t it
rq*44 At44"tod - t4i t* ft a * EMw t»
hvi"M " "k tift f- ..4 cut*
13
WATER SERVICE EASEWNT
96.0 0
12
BRICK
Z MEDICAL/ -1
CEN TFIR
BUILDING
Vol
SCALE
10 11'
__311
13USSE AVENUE
H E R E T 0 F 0 R E 0 E 0 I C A T E D
L
66'
EASEMENT PK0vj5j
TE OF ILLINOIS I S.S.
NTY OF COOK
"he Village of Mount Prospect does hereby certify that it is the Owner of part
e property described hereon and hereby grants easements as shown for the
.ruction, use and maintenance of utilities.
J this —day of , A.D. 199—.
41
CIMM091CALIM [DISIN Coo
oar
ILLI M5 54L
to*w V414ta'st
d Mur 4rt;j 4ft f 0M 0* �Li M4# w6d
k41Wt,.4 Of Mte04 /,, Mt t it
rq*44 At44"tod - t4i t* ft a * EMw t»
hvi"M " "k tift f- ..4 cut*
VIL ,,GE OF MOUJNT PR St --CT
0N ANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F Dr*on, Village Manager
FROM:, David M elements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: January 1 1991
SUBJECT: Grant of Easement, 12 East Busse Avenue and Village Parking Lot,
Northeast +Corner of Busse and Main
The owners of the abea e noted properties are requestirlJ that Grant of Easement for
water services, storm %sewer and Commonwealth Edison use be approved. The
Commonwealth Edison ,easement will provide underground electrical service to the
medical center building at 12East Busse Avenue. The water easement will likewise
provide such service t,12 East Busse Avenue, The storm water sewer will allow the
Village to maintain the rocently installed sewer on the medical center building property.
The Plan Commission nct in regular session on Wednesday, January 2, 1991 and voted
6-0 in favor of recomrrrrding approval of the Plat of Easement. Staff has no objections
to the Plat.
MS:cI I
U�
I � I
ISI
EXHIBIT A
Municipality Po u� lation* 1991 Volume Cap
* Based on the most recent census estimate released by the Bureau of Census prior to
January 1, 1991
RNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
COUNTERPART SIGNATURE PAGE
LIM
Attest:
OF ILLINOIS
SECTION 16. Execution in Counterparts. This Cooperation Agreement
may be -executed simultaneously in any number of counterparts, each of which counter-
part shall be an original and all of which counterparts shall constitute but one and the
same instrument.
SECTION 17. Applicable Law. This Cooperation Agreement shall be
governed by and construed irr accordance with the laws of the State of Illinois.
SECTION 18. Effective Date. This Cooperation Agreement shall be in full
force and effect on the date when it is executed by Municipalities with 1991 "volume
caps" set forth in Exhibit A hereto aggregating at least $8,000,000. Prior to that date,
this Cooperation Agreement shall have no force and effect. This Cooperation Agreement
shall not be binding upon any Municipality which has not executed this Agreement below.
SECTION 19. Filing of Authorizin Ordinances. Each Municipality shall
file with the other Municipalities a certified copy of the ordinance authorizing the exe-
cution of this Cooperation Agreement within three (3) weeks of the adoption of such
ordinance.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Municipalities have caused this Intergovern-
mental Cooperation Agreement to be executed in their respective names by their respec-
tive duly authorized officials shown on the succeeding pages.
-6-
If the Issuer and its professional consultants are unable to obtain the
commitments of participating lenders to originate mortgage loans in a given Municipality
such that the requirements of Sections S and g hereof cannot be satisfied with respect to
that Municipality, the Issuer shall take such lawful steps as are necessary to reallocate to
such Municipality its 1991 volume cap and such Municipality shall no longer be a
participant in the piogram established hereby or bound by the provisions of this
Cooperation Agreement.
SECTIO14 9. Documents Instruments and Opinions. Each Municipality
agrees to enter into all such documents and instrumentsas shall be necessary or appro-
priate in connection ieith the issuance of the Bonds, including without limitation closing
certificates, disclosure representations, and all such other documents and instruments as
shall be necessary or ;appropriate in connection with the issuance of the Bonds. Each
Municipality acknowledges that it has caused its municipal attorney to review this
Cooperation Agreement in order that he ior she may render an opinion regarding its
enforceability and related matters.
SECTION 10. Absolute and Irrevocable Conditions; Amendment. All terms
and conditions contained herein are intended to be absolute and irrevocable conditions
hereof and are agreed to by the Municipalities. This Cooperation Agreement may not be
effectively amended, changed, modified, altered or terminated without the written
consent of all of the Municipalities, authorized by ordinances adopted by their respective
governing bodies, certified copies of which shall be filed with the other Municipalities;
provided that after the issuance of the Bonds no such amendment shall adversely affect
the interests of the owners of the Bonds.
SECTION 11. Obligations Unconditional. The Municipalities shall have no
right to terminate, cancel or rescind this Cooperation Agreement, it being the intent
hereof that the Municipalities shall be absolutely and unconditionally obligated to
perform all covenants contained in this Cooperation '.Agreement from and after the
effective date hereof.
SECTION 12. Notices. All notices, certificates or other communications
hereunder shall be sufflciently given and shall be deemed given when delivered or mailed
by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed to the appropriate address set
forth in Exhibit C hereto. A duplicate copy of each notice, certificate or other
communication given -hereunder to any Municipality shall also be given to the others.
Any Municipality, by notice given hereunder, may designate a different or further
address to which subsequent notices, certificates or other' communications will be sent.
SECTIO14 13. Binding Effect, This Cooperation Agreement shall inure to
the benefit of and shall be binding upon the Municipalities; and their respective successors
and assigns.
SECTION 14. Severabillty. In the event any provision of this Cooperation
Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction,
such holding shall not invalidate or render unenforceable any other provision of this
Cooperation Agreement.
SECTION 15. Further Assurances and Corrective Instruments. The
Municipalities agree that they will, from time to time, execute, acknowledge and deliver,
or cause to be executed, acknowledged and delivered, such supplements hereto and such
further instruments As may reasonably be required for carrying out the expressed
intention of this Cooperation Agreement.
I
otherwise), and to establish fees and compensation of the entities serving in capacities
established in connection with the Bonds and the ongoing mortgage program established
thereby.
SECTION 4. Security for Bonds. The Bonds shall be limited obligations of
the Issuer, secured solely by mortgage loans financed with Bond proceeds, by interests
therein evidenced by obligations of the Government National Mortgage Association
("GNMA"), the Federal National Mortgage Association ("FNMA") or by obligations of
lenders who will originate qualifying mortgage loans under the program, all as the Issuer,
in its sole discretion, shall determine. The Bonds may be supported by municipal bond
insurance policies or other forms of credit enhancement as the Issuer shall determine.
Under no circumstances shall the Bonds be a general obligation of the Issuer or of any
Municipality nor shall they constitute or give rise to a pecuniary liability of the Issuer or
any Municipality or a charge against the general credit or taxing power of the Issuer or
any Municipality.
SECTION 5. Restrictions on Allocation of Mort a e Loans. The documents
under which the Bonds are issued (the "Bond Documents") shall provide that during an
initial period commencing on the date of issuance of the Bonds through and including a
date which is at least six months thereafter (the "Municipal Reservation Period"), a pro
rata share of the initial amount made available to finance mortgage loans or interests
therein, shall be reserved solely for the financing of mortgage loans for residences
located within the corporate limits of each of the Municipalities. Such pro rata share for
any given Municipality shall approximately equal the amount of volume cap contributed
by such Municipality to the issue divided by the initial aggregate principal amount of the
Bonds. After the Municipal Reservation Period, the Bond Documents may provide that
Bond proceeds available to finance mortgage loans be used to finance loans originated on
a first-come, first-served basis, without regard for location of the residence, subject to
federal requirements (such as "target area requirements") which must be observed to
maintain the tax-exempt status of the Bonds, and other reservations (such as reservations
for builders and real estate brokers) which may be desirable in marketing the program.
SECTION 6. Participating Lenders. The Bond Documents shall provide
that during at least the Municipal Reservation Period, for every Municipality, there shall
have been selected and be in place at least one participating lender who has agreed to
use reasonable efforts to originate mortgage loans financed under the program within the
corporate limits of that Municipality.
SECTION 7. Appointment of Professionals. George K. Baum & Company
shall serve as underwriter or placement agent for the Bonds. Chapman and Cutler shall
serve as bond counsel in connection with the issuance of the Bonds.
SECTION 8. Failure to Issue Bonds. The Issuer agrees to use its best
efforts to issue Bonds for the purposes described herein in a timely manner, such that the
1991 volume cap of the Municipalities is not automatically ceded to the Governor's
Office of the State of Illinois under the Bond Allocation Act and the Guidelines. All of
the Municipalities acknowledge and agree that market conditions or other factors could
make it impossible, uneconomic or undesirable for the Bonds to be issued and,
accordingly, the Issuer will not be subject to any liability to the other parties hereto if
Bonds are not issued. The Issuer will endeavor to keep the other Municipalities informed
as to the ongoing status of the preparations for issuance of the Bonds.
-4-
(f) As of the effective date of this Cooperation Agreement, the Municipality
has not taken any action which would have the effect of using or authorizing the
use of all or any;portlon of its 1991 volume cap pursuant to any (1) issuance of any
"private activity bonds" (within the meaning of Section 141 of the Code), (2)
election not to issue qualified mortgage bonds in order to issue mortgage credit
certificates (as defined in the Code), (3) reallocation of any of its "volume cap" to
any other entity, (4) carry forward to future years of any of its "volume cap", or (5)
other action.
(g) As of the effective date of this Cooperation Agreement, the "areas of
chronic economic distress" as described in Section 11430)(3) of the Code within the
Municipality are the areas set forth in Exhibit B hereto.
(h) On or prior to the effective date of this Cooperation Agreement, the
governing body of the municipality conducted a public hearing with respect to the
proposed issuance of the Bonds in conformance with the requirements of Section
147(f) of the Code. At such public hearing, all residents, taxpayers and other
interested persons were given the opportunity to express their views with respect to
the proposed issuance of the Bonds. Notice of such public hearing was duly
published in a newspaper of general circulation in the municipality at least 14 days
prior to the data, of such public hearing. The mayor or President, as the case may
be, or the governing body of the Municipality, as an "applicable elected
representative" of the Municipality pursuant to Section 147(f) of the Code, has
approved the issuance of the Bonds pursuant to said Section on or prior to the
effective date of this Cooperation Agreement.
SECTION 2. Reallocation of Volume Cap. Each municipality hereby agrees
that, immediately u0n the effectiveness of this Cooperation Agreement, it will re-
allocate all of its 19T1 volume cap as set forth in Exhibit A hereto to the Issuer pursuant
to and in accordance with the requirements of the Bond Allocation Act and the
Guidelines in order that the Issuer may use its best efforts to issue the Bonds for the
purposes set forth in Section 3 below.
SECTION 3. Issuance of Bonds. The Issuer hereby agrees that it will use
its best efforts to issue the Bonds in an aggregate prinelpaal amount equal to the surn of
its own 1991 volume cap set forth on Exhibit A hereto plus all volume cap reallocated to
it pursuant to Section 2 above. Thee dTds shall be wssaaed solely for the purpose of
financing mortgage loans for single family residences for low and moderate income
persons within the corporate boundaries of the Municipalities. The Bonds shall be issued
in such series and classes, shall have such stated maturity or maturities, shall bear
interest at such rate -or rates, shall be subject to redemption prior to maturity, shall be
payable at such time or times and at such place or places, and shall have such other
terms, all as shall be approved by ordinance of the governing body of the Issuer or
specified in the trust indenture under which the Bonds are `.ssued.
The Issa(er has complete discretion, as the Issuer of the Bonds, to select the
trustee, the master servicer, if any, and a compliance agent, if any, to serve in such
capacities in connection with the Bonds. The proceeds of the Bonds may be used to
finance mortgage loins or the acquisition of interests therein, as described above„ to
fund reserves for tire payment of debt service on the Bonds, to pay interest or debt
service on the Bonds, to pay costs of issuance of the Bonds or for such other purposes
related to the Bonds or the mortgage loans to be financed thereby as the Issuer deerns
necessary or desirable. Similarly the Issuer has complete discretion, as the issuer of the
Bonds, to invest proceeds of the Bonds (pursuant to a guaranteed investment contract or
M
exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds due to the limitations on the aggregate principal
amount of such bonds which may be issued under each Municipality's "volume cap"
authority; and
WHEREAS, the Municipalities hereby find and determine that the pooling
of all of the "volume cap" authority of each of the Municipalities for 1991 and the re-
allocation of all of such authority to a single Municipality would permit that Municipality
to issue tax-exempt Mortgage Revenue Bonds to finance residences for low and moderate
income persons within the corporate boundaries of all of the Municipalities in an aggre-
gate principal amount of sufficient size to adequately access the capital markets at a
favorable interest rate; and
WHEREAS, to accomplish the foregoing, the Municipalities propose to
reallocate their 1991 "volume cap" to the _ of , Illinois ("the Issuer") and
the Issuer proposes to issue, sell and deliver its Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds,
Series 1991 (the "Bonds") in order to obtain funds to finance the cost of residences for
low and moderate income persons within the corporate boundaries of each of the
Municipalities;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above premises and of the
mutual covenants hereinafter contained and for other good and valuable consideration,
the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the Municipalities hereby agree as follows:
SECTION 1. IRI�etations. Each Municipality represents as follows:
(a) The Municipality (1) is a home rule unit of government and a municipal
corporation duly organized and existing under the laws of the State, (2) has full
power and authority to enter into this Cooperation Agreement and to carry out its
obligations hereunder and (3) by proper corporate action has duly authorized the
execution and delivery of this Cooperation Agreement.
(b) Neither the execution and delivery by the Municipality of this Coopera-
tion Agreement nor the consummation by the Municipality of the transactions
contemplated hereby conflicts with, will result in a breach of or default under or
will result in the imposition of any lien on any property of the Municipality pursuant
to the terms, conditions or provisions of any statute, order, rule, regulation, agree-
ment or instrument to which the Municipality is a party or by which it is bound.
(c) This Cooperation Agreement has been duly authorized, executed and
delivered by the Municipality and constitutes the legal, valid and binding obligation
of the Municipality enforceable against the Municipality in accordance with its
terms.
(d) There is no litigation or proceeding pending, or to the knowledge of the
Municipality threatened, against the Municipality, or to the knowledge of the
Municipality affecting it, which would adversely affect the validity of this
Cooperation Agreement or the ability of the Municipality to comply with its obliga-
tions thereunder.
(e) The population of the Municipality as set forth in the most recent census
estimate released by the United States Bureau of Census prior to January 1, 1991 is
as set forth in Exhibit A hereto. Exhibit A further sets forth the Municipality's
volume cap for calendar—' -year 1991.
Im
RNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT (the
"Cooperation Agreement") dated as of February 1, 1991,by and among the municipalities
and home rule units' of government duly organized ,and validly existing under the
Constitution and the jaws of the State of Illinois which have executed this Cooperation
Agreement (each suefi, municipality being referred to herein as a "Municipality" and all
such municipalities bang collectively referred to as the "!Municipalities");
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, Section 10 of Article VII of the Constitution of the State of
Illinois authorizes units of local government and school districts to contract or otherwise
associate among themselves in any manner not prohibited by law or by ordinances, and to
use their credit, revenues and other reserves to pay cash and to service debt related to
intergovernmental aetivities; and
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act (Illin is Revised
�. ........... -
Statutes 1989, Chapter 127, Paragraph 741 et as supplemented and am--e.n.ded)
authorizes public agencies to exercise jointly with any other public agency in the State of
Illinois any power, privilege or authority which may be exercised by such public agency
individually; and
WHEREAS, the Municipalities are each a unit of local government and a
public agency of the § tate of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and
particularly Article VII, Section 6(a) of the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois,
each Municipality has the power to issue its revenue bonds (the "Mortgage Revenue
Bonds") for public* purposes including the financing and purchase of mortgage loans or
interests therein to finance the cost of residences for low and moderate income persons
within its corporate boundaries, and to pledge to the payment of the principal of,
premium, if any, and,interest on such revenue bonds the payments made with respect to
the mortgage loans purchased with and financed by the proceeds of such revenue bonds;
and
WHEREAS, Pursuant to section 146 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
(the "Code") bonds issued for the purposes described inthe preceding paragraph may not
be issued on a tax-ef*empt basis unless the aggregate principal amount of such bonds
issued by any issuer Is within such issuer's "volume cap" :or the calendar year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 146 of the Code and the relevant provisions
of the Illinois Private, Activity Bond Allocation Act (the "Bond Allocation Act") prior to a
specified date each year, the "volume cap" of each Municipality is limited to $50
multiplied by such Municipality's population based on :he most recent census estimate
released prior to Jan!ary 1 of that calendar year; and ,
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bond Allocation Act and the current Guidelines
and Procedures issued thereunder (the "Guidelines"), each Municipality may reallocate its
volume cap to another Municipality; and
WHEREAS, the Municipalities hereby find and determine that they cannot
individually access the capital markets on favorable terms through the issuance of tax-
mase atmrl/973990-a/4/012391
RNMENTAL, COOPERATION AGREEMENT
officers of the Municipality are hereby authorized and directed to take such further
actions, if any, as are necessary to provide the public approval of the Bonds by the
Municipality under Section 147(6 of the Code.
Section 6. That after the Bonds are issued, this authorizing ordinance shall
be and remain irrepealable until the Bonds and the interest thereon shall have been fully
paid, cancelled and discharged.
Section 7. That the provisions of this authorizing ordinance are hereby
declared to be separable, and if any section, phrase or provision of this authorizing ordi-
nance shall for any reason be declared to be invalid, such declaration shall not affect the
validity of the remainder of the sections, phrases and provisions of this authorizing
ordinance.
Section 8. That all ordinances, resolutions and orders, or parts thereof, in
conflict with the provisions of this autho izing ordinance are, to the extent of such
conflict, hereby superseded. i
Presented, passed, approved and recorded by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospec I t, Cook County, Illinois, this _ day of
, 1991.
[SEAL]
Attest:
Village Clerk
Ayes:
Nays:
Absent or Not Voting:
%a
President
carry out and comply with the provisions of the Cooperation Agreement as executed; and
that the Cooperation Agreement shall constitute and is hereby made a part of this
authorizing ordinance and a copy of the Cooperation Agreement shall be placed in the
official records of the Municipality and shall be available for public inspection at the
principal office of the Municipality.
Section 2. That the President, the Village Clerk and the proper officers,
officials, agents and employees of the Municipality are hereby authorized, empowered
and directed to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents and
certificates as may be necessary to carry out and comply with the provisions of the
Cooperation Agreement and the transactions contemplated by this authorizing ordinance
including the preambles hereto.
Section 3. That all acts of the officers, officials, agents and employees of
the Issuer heretofore or hereafter taken, which are in conformity with the purposes and
intent of this authorizing ordinance and in furtherance of the issuance and sale of the
Bonds, and the same hereby are, in all respects, ratified, confirmed and approved.
Section 4. That the Municipality hereby authorizes and directs the
President and the Village Clerk of the Municipality (or any other officer or official of the
Municipality) to take any and all actions required by the Illinois Private Activity Bond
Allocation Act and the Guidelines which are necessary to effect a reallocation of the
Municipality's 1991 private activity bond allocation to the Issuer in order that the Issuer
may use its best efforts to issue the Bonds for the purposes described herein, such
reallocation to be effective only upon the effective date of the Cooperation Agreement.
Section 5. The President and Board of Trustees of the Municipality hereby
approves the issuance of the Bonds for the purpose of financing a single family mortgage
program for the purchase of one to not more than four family residences in the
Municipality and the other municipalities that are a party to the Cooperation Agreement,
in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $70,000,000. The President and other
-4-
WHEREAS, the Municipality proposes to reallocate its 1991 "volume cap"
to a governmental entity to be specified in the Cooperation Agreement (as executed),
which governmental entity shall either be a home -rule unit of local government which is
a party to the Cooperation Agreement or an Illinois state agency empowered to issue
single family mortgage revenue bonds (such governmental entity being herein referred to
as the "Issuer") so that the Issuer may use its best efforts to issue, sell and deliver its
Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 1991 (the ",Bonds") in order to obtain funds
to finance the cost of one to no more than four family residences for low and moderate
income persons within the corporate boundaries of each of the participating
municipalities;
NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Ordained by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, as follows:
Section 1. That the form, terms and provisions of the proposed Coopera-
tion Agreement be, and they are hereby, in, all respects approved; that the President of
the Municipality be, and is hereby, authorized, empowered and directed to execute, and
the Village Clerk of the Municipality be, and is hereby, authorized, empowered and
directed to attest and,to affix the official seal of the Municipality to, the Cooperation
Agreement in the name and on behalf of the Municipality, and thereupon to cause the
Cooperation Agreement to be delivered to the other parties thereto; that the
Cooperation Agreement is to be in substantially the form presented to and before this
meeting and hereby approved or with such changes therein as shall be approved by the
officer of the Municipality executing the Cooperation Agreement, his execution thereof
to constitute conclusive evidence of his approval of any and all changes or revisions
therein from the form of Cooperation Agreement before this meeting; that from and
after the execution and delivery of the Cooperation Agreement, the officers, officials,
agents and employees, of the Municipality are hereby authorized, empowered and directed
to do all such acts and things and to execute all such documents as may be necessary to
be issued on a tax-exempt basis unless the aggregate principal amount of such bonds
issued by any issuer is within such issuer's "volume cap" for the calendar year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 146 of the Code and the relevant provisions
of the Illinois Private Activity Bond Allocation Act (the "Bond Allocation Act") prior to a
specified date each year, the "volume cap" of the Municipality is limited to $50
multiplied by such Municipality's population based on the most recent census estimate
released prior to January 1 of that calendar year; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Bond Allocation Act and the current Guidelines
and Procedures issued thereunder (the "Guidelines" ), the Municipality may reallocate its
volume cap to another municipality; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality hereby finds and determines that it cannot
individually access the capital markets on favorable terms through the issuance of tax-
exempt mortgage revenue bonds due to the limitations on the aggregate principal amount
of such bonds which may be issued under the Municipality's "volume cap" authority; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality hereby finds and determines that the pooling
of all of the "volume cap" authority of the Municipality and certain other municipalities
for 1991 and the reallocation of all of such authority to a single governmental entity
would permit that governmental entity to issue tax-exempt mortgage revenue bonds to
finance residences for low and moderate income persons within the corporate boundaries
of all of the municipalities in an aggregate principal amount of sufficient size to
adequately access the capital markets at a favorable interest rate; and
WHEREAS, it is now determined that it is necessary, desirable and in the
public interest for the Municipality to enter into an Intergovernmental Cooperation
Agreement (the "Cooperation Agreement") dated as of February 1, 1991, by and among
the Municipality and the other municipalities listed therein, to effect the purposes
described in the preceding paragraph and a form of such Cooperation Agreement is
currently before this President and Board of Trustees; and
10
AN ORDINANCE authorizing the execution and delivery of an Inter-
governmental Cooperation Agreement and, reallocation of private
activity bond volume cap in connection with the issuance of certain
Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds and related matters.
WHEREAS, Section 10 of Article V1.1 of the Constitution of the State of
Illinois authorizes units of local government and school districts to contract or otherwise
associate among themselves in any manner not prohibited by law or by ordinances, and to
use their credit, revenues and other reserves to pay cash and to service debt related to
intergovernmental activities; and
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act (Illinois Revised
Statutes 1989, Chapter 172, Paragraph 741 at seq., aA supplemented and amended)
authorizes public agencies to exercise jointly with any other public agency in the State of
Illinois any power, privilege or authority which may be exercised by such public agency
individually; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospet, Cook County, Illinois (the
"Municipality") is a home -rule unit of local government and a public agency of the State
of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the Constitution of the State of Illinois, and
particularly Article VU, Section 6(a) of the 1970 Constitution of the State of Illinois, the
Municipality has the power to issue its revenue bonds for public purposes including the
financing and purchase of mortgage loans or interests, therein to finance the cost of
residences for low and moderate income persons within its corporate boundaries, and to
pledge to the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, and interest on such revenue
bonds the payments made with respect to the mortgage loans purchased with and
financed by the proceeds of such revenue bonds; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 146 of the, Internal Revenue Code of 1986
1
(the "Code") bonds issued for the purpose described in the preceding paragraph may not
WHAT IS THE CITY OF AURORA BOND
PROGRAM?
The City of Aurora Bond PI o1
is an opportunity for first-tir
home buyers to obtain low
interest financing for home
mortgages. All mortgages
are avatiable on a first -
conte, first -serve basis.
I IOW DO I KNOW IF I
QUALIFY?
WHAT KIND OF HOME IS ELIGIBLE?
Existing one and two family residences in the
City of Aurora are eligible. (?Ivo family
residences must be at least five years
old to qualify.) New one family units
meeting FHA and VA requirements
are also eligible. New units may
not have been previously occupied
except by the borrower on an
interim basis. The purchase price
of th,+ hnmp must not erreed the
maximum price limits for both
targeted and non -targeted areas as
noted in this brochure. These price limits
are subject to change.
(71argetrd areas arc determined by the US. 7Yrasury.)
You must be a first-time home buyer.
You may not have had any ownership
interest in your principal residence within
three years of the closing date. EXCEPTION:
Borrowers who are purchasing property in
targeted areas are exempt from the three-year
rule.
MAXIMUM HOUSEHOLD INCOME'
KANE.COUN" DUPAGE COUNTY
F.0.liII.YSIZF. TARGETED NON -TARGETED NON TARGErED
Less than 3 $51,600 543,000 $43,400
3 or more 60,200 49,450 49,910
•Naht,rt to change- and anyone urha is to
,z�•s u)�s ,�^�iettn,ze
Yuri, annual gross hrtuseholtl inconte will be
ret=ic•i-ed n=nth the f ttlowing criteria tit mind:
(1) Your monthly housing payment
(principal, interest, property taxes, insurance
and homeowners association dues, where
applicable) must not be greater than 29% of
your gross monthly income. (2) Your monthly
housing payment, plus 5% of the balances on
all credit cards, installment obligations and
child care expense must not exceed 41% of
your monthly gross income. Your credit
history should reflect a timely payment of all
credit obligations including rent payment,
personal loans, charge accounts, student
loans, etc. You should be able to shun) a
stable employment history for at least tivo
rears The property must he supported by a
sat+sfnrterry appraisal. The property must
adhere to all !or al building and fire r,Jcs
You rmoat occupy the property wilhio tit) days
ofh�r d to.vtutl..
MAXIMUM PURCHASE PRICE
KANE COUNTY
DUPAGECOUNTY
TARGLITI) NON -TARO PTEA
NON.TARGERD
New 1 -unit $185,990 $152,180
$135,810
Existing (-unit 128,260 104,940
P6?10
Existing 2 -unit 144;430 118,00
I08,3
with each applicant, but may be as high a
9.29% for FILA loans and as high as ;i. 75'
for VA loans. FIIA and VA loans INptcall
require less cash for down payment an.
closing costs than any other loan prograri
Contact a Champion Federal loan officer fi;.
more details.
The City of Aurora Bund Program loans or,
assumable at the original interest ruts, hu
the party ussumiing the inortga,4,• ,nit:
comply iviih the program rlt,, iui
requirements. Far example, the � +.i.,.
have owned their principal remlr n„ ,1......
the past three years (unt"s . uhrrrt pr -pert,
is in the targetedarea).
HOW DO I APPLY?
You may apply on or after September 1, /9y(
You must have a signed sates donut, t at tl�
time of application. For your per: , ,
please make sure your real r.,t�a,
contract is subject to financing. Fur
piucessing of your loan, you shouiri ui-
t,; g r„ rhe n ticadiert_
In addition to the maximum purchase prices,
1. Signed copies of your last three years
the ,standard FHA and VA maximum loan
Federal tax returns with nil st-hedules
amounts apply. In Kane County, IItc
2. The non-refundable application fee q.52.io
ntaximum allowable FHA loan on a one
for one -family residences.
fancily residence is $118,750. In_Dupal;e
_.'3. Property description, including lr' r,I
County, the maximum allowable FRA loan-
deseription, lot size, age and instru,
on a one -family residence is .$104,100. The
f )rappruiser IVguin uccess.
FHA limits are subject to change.
4. Social Security numbers for all harm
5. Names and addresses of employers j ,t
Neo years.
WHAT ARE THE TERMS OF THE
fi. Account numbers and addresses for
MORTGAGE?
savings, checking and loan amounts.
T Monthly payments, including evidence of
The term of the loan is 30 years, with an
monthly child care cost, and balances on
interest rate of 8.5%. Closing costs include a
outstanding debts.
1% origination fee, 2.25% discount points, a
8. V4 only -- DD 214 or Certificate of
$250 application fee, and other customary
Eligibility, original payroll stuh.
charges. If you are eligible and apply for a
`) FiIAonly- copyofrecentbankstatelount.
stub, photo identification earl noel
VA loan, the seller must pay the discount
poyrv)ll
arlen='e of so tad Security numbers.
points In addition, you tail( be required to
pay a mortgage insurance premium for FHA
loans or a VA funding fee for VA loans. The
IIOW DO I GET MORE INFORMATION7
mortgage insurance premium and the
fouling fee may he paid in cash or financed
('wttact a loan officer at Champion Federa
in the loan amiuint.
t 7081 892 -8901 -
The Annual Percentage Rate (APR) may vary
"eorge K. Baum& Compai y,
NvEsTmENT BANKERS
MEMBER OP
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE INC
MIDWEST STOCK EXCHANGE
December 14, 1990
Mr. David C. Jepson
Director of Finance
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056-3266
Dear David:
5A WEST HUBBARD STREET
SUITE A33
CHICAGO ILLINOIS 80CIO
TELEPHONE 13121 6459407
On behalf of Bill Morris and Dennis Lloyd, I would like to'thank you for spending time with
us on December 12. It was a pleasure speaking with you about housing programs to assist
Mount Prospect. The multi -city single family bonds should work well for Mount Prospect.
In today's market the mortgages would be at 8.2 to 8.4% and reach most of your first time
middle income condo and townhouse buyers.
The federal guidelines for Mount Prospect are:
Income for a family of one or two: $43,400
Income for a family of three or more: $49,910
Purchase price for a new home: $135,810
Purchase price for an existing home: $96,210
The last week of November there were 47 properties listed for sale in Mount Prospect wbich
fit within the limits.
Bill and I would be happy to address this issue with the Village Board if you would like.
We will stay in touch with you, but if you have any questions in the meantime, please call.
Thanks again for agreeing to host the seminar on January 9, 1990.
Sincerely,
Bruce A. Ring, Jr.
Public Finance Representative
BAR/smc
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois,
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
T0: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David'C, Jepson, Finance Directc
DATE: December 17, 1990
SUBJECT: First -Time Home Buyers Mortgage Revenue Bond Program
Recently I talked to representatives of George K. Baum '+& Co. regarding a first-
time home buyer mortgage revenue bond program for the Village of Mount Prospect.
A program of this nature uses the proceeds of a tax-exempt bond issue for
mortgages for qualified home buyers. The mortgages are 'usually about 1.5% lower
than existing market rates.
The program would pool the Village's private -activity bond allocation (or
industrial development bond authority) of $2,500,000 'along with several other
municipalities to make a bond issue possible. This is similar to the Cook County
program that was in place several years ago but which has not been available for
the last 3-4 years.
There is no risk or liability to the Village and George K. Baum & Co. markets
the bonds and provides any informational material that is necessary. The
advantage to this program is that it makes'i the money available for a 4-6 month
period. Previously our, allocation went to the Illinois Development Authority
(IDA) who issued the mortgage bonds. The mortgages were then available on a
statewide basis first=come, first-served. The mortgage money was usually
exhausted in 1-2 days.
George K. Baum would like to come to Mount Prospect on January 9, 1991 to explain
the program to you and 'me as well as to any other municipalities who might be
interested. They then would make a presentation to the Village Board if we
wanted to participate.
The plan must be approved by the end of February to allow time to put the bond
issue together prior to April 30. On May 1 any unused',proceeds revert to IDA.
Attached are copies of the letter I received -from Baum and an information sheet
for the City of Aurora program.
DCJ/sm
Enc
tion carried
is case must
ZBA,- 8-V-91
January 24, 1991
Page 3 of 3
e Board.
ZBA-8-V-91
January 24, 11:'
Page 2 of :1
was provided. Ms. Haugh stated that the building will
wheelchairs and others who would not be able to tour the
building, visual access to the museum through the use of
video equipment. Ms. Haugh stated they would like the
building to keep looking as if it were in the 1900's but
handicapped access codes must be met.
Ms. Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that this is a unique situation because the accesso:'_
building proposed is not a typical accessory building such i
a storage shed, "Is. Farnham stated that staff feels the
proposed facility is an appropriate accessory use to the
museum. The height variation is requested to match the roof
height of the existing carriage house. The two buildings will
not touch due to fire codes. Ms. Farnham continued stating
that the size variation is needed to accomodate the propose(i
handicapped restrooms and display use.she noted that the
building will be slightly larger than a typical two -car
garage. Staff has no objections to the parking variation
request noting that on street parking is adequate for
ordinary museum demand. In addition, paving a large portion
of the lot would detract from its residential character
Kurt Grother, 21 S. Maple, stated that the Historical
museum is a great contribution to the Village of Mount
Prospect, but he would like the parking to be allowed on on,
side of the street.
The Board then discussed the petitioners request noting that
this is a very fineorganization.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for the following variations:
1. Section 14.102.13 to allow more than one accessory
building on a lot.
2. Section 14.102.13.3 to allow 15'-4" height rather th,.:
the maximum 10' allowed by Code.
3. Section 14.102.B.4 to allot,- 775 sq, feet size rathe!,
than the permitted maximum of 120 sq. feet.
4. Section 14.3012.A to allow 2 on-site parking spaces
rather than the 8 required by Code.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Iff
iii
11
ji
MIN WES OF THE RE
PROSPECT ZC
2131CASE NO. 8-"/"91
PETITIONER: H-0,
SUBJECT PROPERTX
PUBLICATION DST
REQUEST:
fl
141 1 M
1-
V
ZBA
-1 ERIS P
pl)Rp- NT*
if
o
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTER,,„,TED PARTIES
Chairman Basni ntroduced t
Z
petitioner is "uesting car
allow more tha-ane accessor
Section 14.102.1, .3 to allow
* , ” y
maximum 10 al 11,11 e d b Code.
'775 sq. feet rather tha
sq. feet. Se- c ill", n 14,3012-A
r
spaces ratbe n 8 eOquire
The petit! one.111111'r I I elores Haug
Historical IS 0 ell, /'Aty, presente
proposed acres F bijIlding
to the museum. e stated tf
lifts but foun that of Inst
dcruse damage b-'11 use, of the
i M
ty�. sc
the histo ricalj,11,,,nte9r
have received emption for
the main muse U jbuilding if
ii
)5pec
M.
f
Br,ol
d 'C g
t iB;
ele
rdI
Gr(
THE
PEALS
nuary, 24, 1991
orical Society
Section 14.102.
than one
ng on a lot.
.3 to allow 15' -
than the
ode. Section
low 775 sq. ft.
permitted 120
n 14.3012.A to
parking spaces
8 required by
Chairman
M.
21- S. Maple
that the
tion 14.102.E to
garage) on a,lot-
ther than the
.B.4 to allow
maximum of 120
ite parking
he it. Prospect
ng that the
�dicapped access
;aced ramps and
,ng building may
Ling or destroy.
Stec that they
Lpped access to
,caDnned center
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4
Staff does not have any major objections to the variations requested. The museum is a
permitted use in the R-1 Zoning District. The handicapped facility is considered an
"accessory building" because a more appropriate term or use designation cannot be found
in the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance. As a result, this facility must be measured
against standards designed for typical accessory/storage buildings.
Staff requests that the applicant clearly discuss the need for the separate facility in lieu of
retro -fitting the primary structure. Staff does feel that maintaining the aesthetic integrity
of the Historical Museum is a commendable goal.
DMC:hg
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
variance is required to allow them both on the same lot. Staff feels that the proposed
facility is an appropriate accessory use to 04� museum. It is considered an accessory
building and subject to applicable codes, because the Zoning Ordinance does not provide
for this rather unique situation.
An attempt has been made to design the two buildings to appear as one. The roof on the
new building extends over a walkway between the buildings, to match the 15'4" roofline
height of the carriage house. Matching the roofline is necessary to visually connect the new
building with the existing building. The 10 foot maximurniheight allowed would appear
awkward in this situation and result in inadequate ceiling clearance for the intended use.
In addition, the 15'-4" proposed height is not, significantly'higher than existing accessory
buildings on abutting lots which appear to be from 10'-12' tall.
The variance request to construct an accessory building 655 sq. ft. larger than Code permits
appears significant. However, the proposed accessory museum facility, which is permitted
under R-1 zoning, is not a typical "accessory building". Full handicapped restroom facilities
and a 460 sq. ft. open meeting area will be provided in the proposed building. The purpose
of this facility is to provide handicapped access to historical information and artifacts.
Displays, lectures, slide shows, etc. will take place in the new facility to allow items located
inside the main museum building to be accessed without requiring actual entry into the
house. Obviously, 120 sq. ft. is not enough space to accommodate the proposed use.
A variation is also requested to the on-site parking requirements. Eight spaces are required
by Code and two are provided in the driveway. The applicant claims that most visitors park
on adjacent streets which typically have ample parking during museum hours. Providing 8
on-site parking spaces would require paving a significant portion of the property. The
applicant prefers to retain the residential character of the lot and a recently planted garden
area.
Staff believes that there is sufficient on -street parking to accommodate museum visitor
demand. Staff would also prefer to retain the residential character of the site, even though
additional paving may not exceed that maximum lot coverage since the proposed lot
coverage will only be 25.2%.
M"10111"Wilk 4XV-11
No major objections were expressed by ot—ofiZr-Pf7ePart�ment suggesK
that the building be Warmed for fire and security. Inspection Services notes that the
building will require fire proofing. Engineering requires a grading plan to be submitted
prior to issuance of building permits.
Gil Basnik, Chair -man Appeals
Page 2
App
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of - -
REQUM
The applicant is requesting several variations to accommodate construction of a
handicapped accessible museum facility. variations are requested from:
1. Section 14.102-B to allow two detached accessory buildings, other than a private
garage, on one lot. The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows two accessory
buildings per lot provided one is a garage.
2. Section 14.102.B.3 to allow a 15'-4" maximum height of an accessory building. The
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance limits the height of accessory buildings to 10 feet.
3. Section 14,102.13.4 to allow a 775 sq. ft. accessory building. The Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance limits the size of accessory buildings to 120 sq. ft.
4. Section 14.3012.A to allow 2 on-site parking spaces rather than the 8 spaces required
by Code.
pIANNING.,AN ZONING CO-MMEMLAND-U-NOM
Summary or application: The Mount Prospect Historical Society is required to provide
handicapped accessibility to a portion of the museum to remain eligible for government
grants. The existing museum is located in an old three-story house. Rather than retro-
fit this structure with appropriate handicapped access facilities (ramps, etc.), the Historical
Society is proposing to construct a separate display/educational building on the property.
Complete handicapped restroom, facilities will also be provided in the new building. The
existing carriage house will also undergo rehabilitation to be used for displays and exhibits.
The property consists of two lots of record, but is considered a "zoning lot" per a recent
amendment to the Zoning Ordinance. Since the property is considered one lot for zoning
purposes, this proposal results in two accessory buildings on a lot. A variance is needed
since neither accessory building is a garage. Variations for height and size are also
necessary since the proposed facility is not designed with typical storage shed dimensions.
In addition, the applicant is requesting a variation to the on-site parking requirements. Two
parking spaces are provided in the driveway, however, 8 are required on-site.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The new building Will continue the
5+ foot setback from the east property line established by the existing carriage house, which
meets Code requirements. Accessory buildings on abutting residential properties are also
set back about 5 feet. Consequently, the museum accessory buildings will have to be
constructed according to all applicable fire codes. The new building will be located directly
south of the carriage house. The two buildings will not be physically attached, to comply
with various Building and Fire Codes. Because neither of these buildings is a garage, a
YlLj,AGE OF MOUNT PROSPtCl
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ftylr�
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF, PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 17, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-8-V-91
APPLICANT. MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
ADDRESS: 101 SOUTH MAPLE STREET
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1
LOT SIZE: 103.91 x 157.11 = 16.323 sq. fL
% COVERAGE: 252%
F.A- R. : 0.29
a
� RacK ccNr+ucY � _i,xs
x 1
t _
-
- s _
!i sy
WOW—
:06� + + / "0
1
COOA C. culla.
—,L—
O
fl z 1
r,
{ n
` .. s
1'
to
a \ x.aA
� h} r
�3 g
j—, 2971;
go,
157.10
£ 7l} 3
Z> (71 AA
O
O
Y
� O-
John Fulton Dixon
January 28, 1991
Page 2
2. A variance to the 10 foo it is requested in order to match the roof line
t height lirm
ofthe two buil ding5, Staff notes that the proposed height of 1514" is not significantly
higher than garages and sheds on a abutting lots.
3. The third variance is to allow re rather than, the
120 4garefoot mminjAm size allowed, Ms. Farnham again stated that the proposed
building is not a typical accessory structure. The building will provide full
handicapped restrooms and a meeting/display area which obviously require more
than 120 square feet. She further noted that the overall building dimensions will be
25' x 31' which is only slightly larger than a standard two -car garage.
4. The fQurth variation is to allow 2 Qn-site =king spaces rather than 8 as reQuired by
Cg.dg, Ms. Farnham stated that staff felt there was adequate on -street parking to
meet ordinary museum demand. To provide the required 8 on-site parking spaces
a significant portion of existing lawn area would have to be paved. Staff feels that
this would detract from the residential and historic character that the Mount Prospect
Historical Society wants to retain, for the museum and the surrounding neighborhood.
Ms. Farnham summarized the request, stating that the Planning and Zoning Department
feels this is an appropriate accessory use and that the Mount Prospect Historical Society is
designing the new facility to blend with existing buildings and retain the aesthetic integrity
of the museum and site. Staff has no major objections to the variations requested.
The Zoning Board discussed the request and generally felt that the proposed accessory
building would enhance the existing facility and benefit the Village of Mount Prospect.
Accordingly, by a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the
variations to allow construction of an accessory museum building at 101 South Maple Street.
DMC:hg
I
VILL.AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
...........
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
1
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DiIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 1'7, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-91, MOUNT PRI OSPECT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
LOCATION: 101 SOUTH MAPLE STREET
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
the following variance requests filed by the Mount Prospect Historical Society:
1. Section 14.102.13 to allow two accessory Ilbuildings on a lot.
i
2. Section 14.102.B.3 to allow 15'-4" height ':rather than the maximum 10 ft. allowed by
Code.
3. Section 14.102.B.4 to allow 775 sq. ft. �size rather than the maximum 120 sq. ft.
allowed by Code.
4. Section 14.3012.A to allow 2 on-site parking spaces rather than 8 required by Code.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of January 24, 1991. At the
meeting Dolores Haugh, President of the Mount Prospect Historical Society, presented
testimony in favor of the request. Mrs. Haugh explained that the Historical Society is
obligated to provide handicapped accessibility to the Museum. Several alternatives have
been explored, including, adding ramps and wheelchair lifts to the existing building, adding
an addition to the existing building, and renovating the carriage house to provide the
required handicapped accessibility. However, due to various Building and Fire Codes, these
alternatives could not be implemented without jeopardizing the historical integrity of the
existing building. She further explained that the proposed 775 square foot accessory building
would include handicapped accessible restrooms and an open meeting/display area. She
also noted that the new building is designed to blend with the existing carriage house by
matching the roof lines.
Julie Farnham, Planner, stated that the museum is a permitted use in the R-1 District, and
that the Zoning Ordinance does not provide a definition for the type of structure proposed.
The request had to be measured against the standards for typical accessory structures, such
as, garages and sheds, She then explained the individual variances:
1. T_Q allo. two acc _c
. gmgry buildings on on - lol, Ms. Farnham stated that staff feels this
is an appropriate accessory use to the Museum and has no objection to this variation.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 5
Despite some significant variations, this is one of the best proposals the Planning staff has
seen for this difficult site. 'The types of tenants anticipated appear to be appropriate for this
rather remote and small piece of commercial property, and would have less impact on
adjoining residences than other uses previously discussed with staff.
i
As previously discussed, the rezoning request was initiated by staff. We believe B-3 zoning
is appropriate in this location on this small lot.
Staff generally supports the proposal with the following exceptions:
1. A minimum 5' building setback should be provided from the proposed east property
line. This will increase the distance between existing and potential future buildings.
The applicant should justify the need for the variance, including the feasibility of
reducing the size of the building to further increase the building setback.
2. Staff also recommends that the parking lot setback abutting residential prop" to
the east be increased to 16 feet. The 3'-11" setback proposed represents an 80.4%
variation which is a significant reduction of Code requirements. Staff recommends
a 16 foot setback which could be achieved by reducing the size of the building by 21
feet. In this regard, the applicant should address the development feasibility of
reducing the size of the building and any associated hardships.
3. Staff cannot support such a drastic parking variation. Staff encourages the applicant
to attempt to lease': the building with uses that can be accommodated by the 18 on-
site spaces provided. Parking variations should be considered relative to specific
uses, not on assumed uses. Parking variations should not be granted until a specific
need is identified.
In addition, staff suggests approval of the request should be conditioned on:
Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property line (abutting the
residential property).
rty).
Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings.
All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground.
Any security lighting which faces residential property shall consist of cut-off fixtures
(down -lighting).
No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building,
Guardrail on west facade shall be a dark colored metal (e.g. brown).
I
DMC:hg
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 4
recommends that the total length of the shopping center be reduced from 121 feet
to 100 feet, providing four 25 foot storefronts. In this way, a 5 foot setback can be
provided at the east line, and a 16 foot setback at the west line.
Where parking lots abut residential property, landscape screening must be provided
which is at least 6 feet in height. Staff suggests that a six foot solid wood fence be
erected along the west edge of the property extending south toward Euclid Avenue
to the screened garbage dumpster. This will provide the required screening in the
narrow space and will eliminate headlights shining into the adjacent residential
property.
The proposed site plan provides 18 on-site parking spaces. These meet the Code
requirement of 4/1000 for general retail uses. However, the applicant indicated his
tenants might include carry -out fast-food types of restaurants, such as, a Little
Caesar's Pizza or a frozen yogurt shop. Accordingly, the parking requirement was
calculated based on assuming half of the building area would be used for Class IV
(fast-food) restaurant. The required parking ratio for Class IV Restaurants is 15
spaces per 1,000 sq. ft. of building area. This standard is designed to accommodate
the typical franchise fast-food restaurants rather than smaller, more specialized
restaurants.
Staff anticipates that the type of restaurants that might locate in this building are
likely to be smaller, primarily, take-out establishments which wouldn't generate a
great need for parking. However, while a carry -out restaurant may not need all the
parking required by Code, it could generate more customer traffic than other
permitted office or small retail uses. Because future tenants have not been specified,
staff suggests taking a conservative approach and consider parking variations when
and if they are needed based on a specific tenant's needs. Staff urges the property
owner to make an effort to lease the space to tenantg who comply with the existing
parking requirements for retail uses. Parking variations should be considered when
a specific tenant is identified so that the actual magnitude of the variation can be
measured more accurately.
No major objections or concerns were raised with regard to the rezoning. Some concerns
were expressed regarding the variations including:
Inspections Services notes that the location of fuel oil tanks on the site may affect
the type of construction (fire rating) required.
Detention must be provided on-site. Engineering notes that some water may be
stored on the parking lot surface. A grading/site engineering plan is required.
An access permit to Euclid Ave. must be obtained from the Cook County Hwy. Dept.
Utilities are available, however, permits must be obtained from Citizens Utility
Company and Cook County.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
2. Yarialion Reguoli
a. 0'-!X sidoyard(tuiJdin&LXIb-Uk
The applicant is requesting a 0'-0" building setback adjacent to commercial property.
A 10 foot sideyard is required by Code. Staff has several concerns with such a drastic
variation. First, building footings typically span at least 18" at their base. No part
of a footing can be located off-site. To accommodate the footings, a minimum
setback of 2 ft. should be provided. Second, staff notes that the existing gas station
building is 20'-0" from the proposed new lot line. It is likely that future
redevelopment of the gas station site would involve construction of a new building.
AO'-O"or T-O"side yand setback, as proposed, poses someV potentially negative impacts
on the future redevelopment of the Mobil site. The adjoining gas station site is
rather a small comer lot, and any new construction would undoubtedly require
variations. Allowing the proposed shopping center so near the lot line, could limit
the feasibility of granting reasonable variations for redevelopment of the Mobil site,
due to separation requirements between buildings.
Staff believes a minimum of a 5 ft. setback should be maintained, so the proposed
use will not have any adverse impact on redevelopment potential of the Mobil site.
0 MMy, IT!E=7 R 2
A 0'-0" setback is requested along the proposed east property line. This would allow
a direct connection between the proposed parking lot and the existing Mobil site.
Staff encourages the coordinated development of these lots, since they are both
relatively small. This would help traffic flow and access considerably.
I
The front setback, along Euclid Avenue tapers from 197-0" to 2'-6" at the narrowest
point. This results from the angled front lot line along Euclid Avenue. The 2'-6"
setback is adjacentIo the driveway opemng onto Euclid Avenue. This area must be
free of significant landscaping in order to maintain unobstructed site lines. Staff
feels adequate parking lot screening be achieved along most of the frontage.
A Y-11" setback is requested adjacent to residential property to the west. A 20 foot
setback is required by Code. The adjacent residential lot is oriented lengthwise along
Euclid Avenue. The garage is 16' from the lot line. A shed exists between the
garage and the lot' line, providing some additional separation between the parking
lot and the neighboring home. The home, is approximately 40' from the parking lot.
Staff believes this is a significant variation. The 20' setback is designed to provide
a buffer for the adjoining residence. To provide a conforming setback, the petitioner
would essentially have to eliminate one storefront. This effects the development
economics substantially, and the petitioner should fully explain the absolute hardship
in this instance.
This setback variation is related to the sideyard reduction along the east line. Staff
Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 2
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting to rezone the western 17,798 sq. ft. of Lot 1 in Mobil Oil
Corporation Subdivision from B4 to B-3, Business Retail and Service. Concurrently the
following variations are requested to accommodate construction of a small shopping center
from:
1. Section 14.2002.13 to allow 0'-0" building setback adjacent to commercial property.
2. Section 14.2002.E to allow the following Parking lot setback variations:
-minimum 2'-6" front setback in lieu of 30 ft.,
4.0" side setback to commercial property in lieu of 10 ft., along the east fine.
-3'-11" side setback to residential property in lieu of 20 ft., along the west fine.
3. Section 14.3012.A to allow 18 on-site parking spaces in lieu of 44 spaces required.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a 4,575 sq. ft. building
consisting of four 1,143 sq. ft, retail stores on a vacant portion of 2020 Euclid Avenue. A
subdivision of this property is concurrently proposed. Eighteen on-site parking spaces will
be provided. The main drive aisle will provide through -access to the existing Mobil Station
directly east.
Because of the small size of the lot, several setback variations are requested for the building
and parking lot. These will be discussed individually below. Staff notes that the rear
setback of 20 feet meets Code. This is significant because the property abuts 3 or 4
residential lots to the north.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact:
The subdivision of this property to create the new 17,798 sq. ft. lot, will be considered
by the Plan Commission on February 6, 1991. Rezoning of this new lot from B-4 to
B-3 was suggested by staff, primarily because the relatively small size of the new lot
and proposed development lends itself to B-3 retail uses.
In the past, the Planning and Zoning Department has received several inquiries
about developing the lot for such permitted B-4 uses as car washes and drive-thru
fast-food restaurants. These uses on this small parcel would require substantial
variations, and negatively impact the adjoining single family homes. Staff believes
this proposal better fits the lot, and is a more acceptable development. However, the
rezoning to R-3 is important so uses in the small shopping center remain more retail
in nature.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 15, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-4Z-91, ZBA-5-V-91
APPLICANT: ELIE CHARTOUNI
ADDRESS: 2020 EUCLID AVENUE
LOCATION MAP:
:7, - - --------
-::JJ
low
3
4 V --------
�p
nv_
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: B4 (Request rezoning to B-3)
LOT SIZE: 17,798 sq. ftn
% COVERAGE: 74.2%
F-A—R. : N/A
ZBA-4-Z-91
ZBA-5-V-91
January 24, 1991
Page 4 of 4
tenants who would locate there would probably not have a
large parking need. Mr. Brettrager questioned why a variation
is being requested without the tenants being established.
Mr. Lannon noted that the petitioner is "down zoning" the
parcel which is'better for the residential area, and should
be granted some relief to the parking regulations in return.
Chairman Basnik asked if the petitioner would to amend the
parking layout to provide 23 spaces by reducing the size of
the building. Mr. Chartouni agreed.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioner a rezoning from a B-4 to a B-3 district.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioner the following variation requests:
1. From Section 12.2002.B. to allow a 01-0" building
setback from the east property line.
2. From Section 14.2002.E. to allow the following
parking lot setbacks:
-minimum 2'-6" front setback
-01-0" side setback from the east property line
-3'-11" side setback from the west property line
3. From Section 14.3012.A. to allow 23 on-site parking
spaces per staff approval of the final configuration.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brothers, Brettrager, Skowron
NAYS: Cassidy, Basnik
Motion carried by a vote of 4-2.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
gg
Ilj�V
IV,
14
Aft
staff's reluctari'TINA'16 to support t11 a, lal
,
?"f
knowing the act needs of a !$ W
P,
s,i
suggested that p a r k rig, vasa
4,01 a specific t
be addressed
dg/,
in summary Ir 0 F menu noted I
condi I
.
'I to approval/01"& this
J
should be attacN/, thi
61 solid wood f�//
&ce on the WfO,/q"/
rope r
g
-Face brick on &A4111 4 sides of *fi, b u`li I d:
go
"/#/(,al equipment1f,"i, 11 ;be
Roof top mechady IN/
HER',
not visible frdiff the ground
-Security light g in rear of di
4b6if,
Ang
7/7"',
mei
(out-off) f
�/kk of buildide s
i�
Al
No signage on
Guard rail on w-/,/-
t facade sh6111,101 e
exterior brick
Mr. Clements std id that this �J///Ir
7
lopme
the parcel of
Dan Ansani 201 �1/11 Chinka" Oa at4d
pin 'V
proposal such arbage, flo,J: and:
N,
%
ggr
Paul Zwiecan, 26//,� 1
,�['5 Chinkapin state
type of tenants./Mr. Zwiercan ted, th
3,
food tenant and "eels his proper
vela
Frank Riccio, ?f,",17 Chinkapin]RO' opp-
property valueyuld
go down
Y 31
"a/g,
2 0 Euclid, c
Dan Zemitis, y lid, state, con er
coordinated devAlopment in thO,,� ea Mr
�koo congestedji�nqlflcould
intersection isillil",
such as an offi8M"
in this oc4t','
n
UP
AA
As
I
I/A
,
Mr. Chartouni st4ted that he you;d p6 t
screen the shop�', ng center fr§6,',,,,Tfhe res
. t Y//ff////, 1 'M�,,,
feels that noisgof 1pi" a r�-su
rom
traffic'(J,,
ds Mi%
g/
limits on Euclih and 'River Ro,
11 ,
Proposed build would be a 0 e r aga
Chartouni prese,6
*Ied the Board/ 1'
i
W/s
,pdsA
neighbors in fa r ofthe pror
that there woulI be no benefit h i in i
with each tenan to receive alliv,`*fiatior
11", "1 Inv
involved would ke it dif f ic�, for � hi
V
HIP",
The Board then nerally discjj�,,a//
d the
q
Basnik noted thl, he would u 1 d p AT,
just
Mr. Lannon statthat the pa/1/4`g vagi i
cause traffic ,k up on Euc venue
Jii 119
ZBA-4-Z-91
ZBA-5-V-91
January 24, 1991
Page 3 of 4
riation without
rant tenant,. lie
gnitude should
fied.
staff suggests
t:
e
,rly screened and
be downlit
hat matches the
appropriate for,
7ns for the neti,
3 of businesses.
,icerns about the
is opposed to a
Ld go down.
ood, also feels
out a lack of
itis feels the
er a single use
evergreens to
ial homes and
high speed
ouni feels the
the 'noise. Mr.
signed by
rtouni stated
has to return
felt the time
lease the space.
at. Chairman
se on this site.
issue would not
the types of
Zn* -4-Z-91
ZBa-5-v-9}
January 24. 1e91
Page 2 or 4
possibly four tenants. Mr. Cbartouui continued by stating
that there is a gas station to the East of the property and
across the street are two strip shopping centers. Also, to
the north of the proposal are single-family residences, "bich
would he 20' from the proposed shopping center. To the "est
is a single-family residence which approves of the proposed
shopping center. Mr. Cburt000i presented the Board with a
letter from the homeowner to the west and u copy of the s'te
plan which the resident also approved, Mr. Cbartouoi sta�cd
that the Unocal gas station to the east stated no objections.
Mr. Cbartouui stated that be "ould like to put some type of
food store in for example an ice cream parlor or Domino's
pizza. Because the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires
restaurants to have = higher rate of parking than retail be
needs the large parking variation. He would also like a
yupero"te or a tailor.
David clemeuta, Director of Planning and zoning, stated that
the site is very small and hard to develop. Mr. Clements
stated that staff suggested the property be down -zoned from
B-4 to H -J. He noted the small size of the lot and the uses
anticipated in this development are conducive to B-3 zoviug,
which permits omaller, less intense commercial use than
allowed under B-4 zoning.
Mr. Clements noted that it would be difficult to develop this
site without some variations. go°e,er, staff has some
concerns with the significant variations requested, Mr.
Clements explained that the proposed 0`-0^ building setbacb,
the east property line, could have a negative impact on a
future redevelopment of the gas station. Be suggested that u
minimum 5' building setback should be maintained uIuog the
east property lioe.
Mr. Clements stated that the proposed 0'-0^ parking lot
setback from the east property line provides an open flow
through drive aisle to the gas station which is a good
traffic control feature. Mr. Clements stated that the 3'-11"
parking lot setback from the west line is tmvmarrow to
provide adequate landscaping next to residential propertx.
Staff suggests that the building size be reduced to allow
this aiderard to be increased. He noted that a 20` setback is
required by Code. He also stated that = G' wood fence should
be located along the west property line to screen headlights.
Mr. Clements indicated that the proposed front parking lot
setback varies from 2'-6^ to 19' and staff believes this is
adequate apace for landscape screening.
With regard to the parking variation , Mr. Clements stated
MIN
MOU,
"ASE NO. 4-
5-
7IONER:
RCT PROPERT
[CATION DAT
"ST:
4EMBERS PRE
VT :
CTORS/INTER
rman Basnik
tioner is r
lso seeking
" sideyard
owing parki
- Miniff
- 0101,
- V-11
ion 14.3012
4 required
petitioner,
ented his c
,t Prospect
. to develoy
S OF THE RE(
FTfPROSPECT ZO!
T'
�E ED PARTIES:
4
I; x troduced th
lieu of I
lot setba
21-6" fro
eyard set
ideyard s
to allow
Code.
ie Charto
4500 sq.
THE
EALS
nuary 24, 1991
ue
4 to B-3 to
I shopping
ons from Section
,ow a 0'_0"
Lt to commercial.
E to allow the
ig lot setback
.mum 2'-6" front
0'_011
L VS. 101. 3'-
-,back to
20'. Section
.ow 18 on-site
Chairman
that the
-4 to a B-3 and
)02.B to allow a
)2.B to allow the
I
tial vs. 20 feet
g spaces in lieu
apin Oak,
tly moved to
this parcel of
ilding for
SITE PLAN
xui+yi+. 3
4r (fe r•c
g' LLi4 ,I,LCO f('?fii
„� �• ups (�c. Ki �fav�azJ
. �•act�«x,41,
s M/
sra WR + j � � ••� � �I
sToR/ L 9 — Y••+ L� I
3r•R� L 4 —� •� �I
1oT•L wf R� �,O�J �N
4
rFi P1.AF.l • zl* , *.?,4 -- q I
�.P�- S -V- 91
John Fulton Dixon
January 29, 1991
Page 3
The Zoning Board discussed the request.
rezoning request, believing that the down-zon
However, several concerns were expressed r
Ronald Cassidy, Gil Basnik and Bob Brettragi
parking variation without being able to meastr
he felt the small size of the building and avail
of tenants who would locate there. He further
a concession by agreeing to down -zone the pr(
the parking requirements in return. The Z(
variations.
to members
g from B-4 t(
tarding the r)
expressed rel
the actual net
4e parking w4
ated that he I
erty and shop
in Board su
Some discussion ensued about the applicant's willingness to
to 4,000 sq. ft. in order to provide four additional on-site
spaces. This would be a variation of 15 spaces from the p,
According, by a vote of 6-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals
17,798 sq. ft. of Lot 1 in Mobil Oil Subdivision(be rezoned
By a vote of 4-2, the Zoning Board of .;
Appeal
granted to allow construction of a small comme'
1. From Section 14.2002.8. to allow a 0'-0. tri
2. From Section 14.2002.E. to allow the foil
-minimum 2'-6" front setback
-0%0" side setback from the east property line
-3'-11" side setback from the west property lir
3. From Section 14.3012A to allow 23 on-site par
final configuration. This would be a 1511space
The motion is subject to the six conditions previously
DMC:hg
noted.
Ln,arlimously supported the
B-3 was a positive change.
,rking variation. Members
-rvations about approving a
J. Peter Lannon stated that
uld naturally limit the types
-It the applicant was making
d be given some relief from
snorted the various setback
rease the size of the building
cing spaces for a total of 23
Ing requirement of 38.
commends that the western
rm B-4 to B-3.
the following variations be
at 2020 Euclid Avenue.
c from the east property line.
E lot setbacks:
per staff approval of the
John Fulton Dixon
January 29, 1991
Page 2
With regard to the setback variances, staff suggests that:
1. A minimum five foot building setback be provided from the east property line. This
will reduce the impact on redevelopment potential to the east.
2. The requested 3'-11" sideyard adjacent to residential property to the west should be
opened up to allow for adequate landscape screening. Staff believes 8-10 ft. would
be sufficient. In addition, staff suggests that a solid 6 ft. wood fence be installed
along the west property line to screen automobile headlights.
3. The required parking was calculated based on the applicant's plan to designate half
the building area for a restaurant use. Since restaurants have a higher parking rate
than general commercial/retail/office, a significant variation is required to allow a
restaurant use on this site. Staff is reluctant to support a variation not knowing the
details on a specific restaurant and its impact on available parking or other uses.
Staff recommends that a parking variation of this magnitude should be considered
at the time a specific tenant is identified.
Staff notes that the proposed front yard setback varies from 2'-6" to 19' which should be
enough space to provide adequate parking lot screening.
Staff also requests that approval of the request be conditioned on:
1. Providing a six foot solid wood fence along the west property line (abutting the
residential property).
2. Providing face brick on all building facades, as shown on submitted drawings.
3. All rooftop mechanical equipment shall be screened, and not visible from the ground.
4. Any security lighting which faces residential property shall consist of cut-off fixtures
(down -lighting).
5. No signage shall be allowed on the back side of the building.
6. Guardrail on west facade shall be a dark colored metal (e.g. brown).
Four residents from the immediate neighborhood expressed their concerns with the
proposal. In general, they felt that this was one of the best proposals presented to date for
this site. Their major concern was the uncertainty of what tenants would locate there. They
unanimously opposed any restaurant establishments that would transmit odors and generate
garbage.
Two letters signed by abutting property owners, in support of the development, were
submitted to the Board.
VILLAGE OF I
PLANNING AND
Mount F
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLA,
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, I
DATE:
JANUARY 29, 1991
SUBJECT:
ZBA-4-Z-91, ZBA-5.V-91,
LOCATION:
2020 EUCLID AVENUE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for y(
variance and rezoning applications filed by Eli
rezoning of the western 17,798 sq. ft. of Lot 1
B-4 to B-3, Business Retail and Service. The
variations:
1. Section 1.4.2002.13 to allow a 0'-0" sid
along the east property line.
2. Section 14.2002.E to allow the
-minimum 2'-6" front setback, a reduct
-0'-0" sideyard setback, a reduction of
-3'-11" sideyard setback to residential, a
west line.
3. Section 14.3012.A to allow 18 on-site
Code.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the
At the meeting, Mr. Chartouni presented testi
the proposed 4,500 sq. ft. commercial building
he does not have specific tenants at this tim
him greater flexibility in leasing part of the
would be willing to reduce the size of the bui
not in favor of reducing the building size to
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zc
Its small size would make it difficult to develc
was generally in support of the proposed smal
about the drastic variations requested. He n(
staff who feels that B-3 zoning is more appro
proposed.
r PROSPECT
DEPARTMENT
Illinois
wt_
iF PLANNING AND ZONING
ELIE CHARTOUNI
air consideration their recommendation on
� Chartouni., The applicant is requesting a
n Mobil Oil Corporation Subdivision from
applicant is also requesting the following
rd adjacent to commercial in lieu of 10 ft.,
parking lot setback variations:
m of the 30 ft. requirement.
[e 20 ft. requirement, along the east line.
eduction of the 20 ft. requirement, along the
spaces in lieu of 44 spaces required by ,
equest at their meeting of January 24. 1991.
iony in support of the request. He described
e hopes to develop. He explained that while
he is seeking a parking variation to allow
lace to a restaurant use. He stated that he
ing to make room for more parking but was
crease setbacks and landscaping areas.
ing, indicated: that this is a very difficult site.
without variations. He also stated that staff
commercial building, but had some concerns
ed that the rezoning request was initiated by
riate for this'small site and the development
ZBA-2-V-91
January 24, 1991
Page 2 of 2
to allow a 41 separation between the principal structure and
an accessory building conditioned on fireproofing the
existing shed per Inspection Services requirements.
Mrs. Brothers moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
Xf, Al
i
"!
J 81(r,
D %/, jf J
4`5G
i1 i
%
p j i��
MINUt S OF THE
i2 l
REG#LMEETIN f� OF THE
MOUNT%PR09PECT
ZONJ' J 86ARD 0 % PPEALS
/
CASEtiO. 2 � ��1
H�acrng Date/danuary 24, 1991
/i
'%,, %I
i
IiIONER:
,
Kenneth and,en Fruh
1
f JJ /,,
g"
243f Yatesgp,Fane
JECT PROPERTY
LICATION"'DATE
`i, 1
Jnary $, 1
/
ii
W, tll
VEST: �'
J
r tion frW—gWSection
a'
1,/A/,'.t02 B.1 tf� 12ow a 4'
1
JV
s, t
sep anon beilleen the principal
!t
sI ru�rture an n accessory
„
i 1'
sructure
o a
MEMBERS PRESEq,T:
G lb rt 'Bas-! Chairman
P¢ter; Lannoel J
/ai
LkjBrcithers j
R J' d Cassii i1
Rb t Brett �er
Mac ele> Skov'
1
ENT'
,%/
Ric rd Prate J
1; i i, ,l
ECTORS/I`vTERESfiED PARTIES Al n,,
ti
pg 1 !J
,
Arman Basnik introduced
th 'tease °stat, "` that the
itioner is requesting a
varhafce from ti on 14.102.B.1
allow a 4' se ; ration betweemE e prin'�%pal structure and
accessary structure .
oi f
g�
l
petitioner, Onneth Fruh
f 'i y
co 43 N. Yap , presented his
;e stating that his existing%
sheer# por„' and shed are at
4' separation, and he would
like t'o re x ld the screen
-ch, converting,/,' it into
a sLTrrq�om tisin %the existing
iodation. j
/J'RM
.ie Farnham, Panner for
thE41111/Mage of/junt Prospect,
rted that the petitioners
re✓ u�'stor t 4 separation
q, l
1 not change iihe drai-aget
O i t
cover -11e and the existing
coverage and 1required
r
yarr� setbacks mFet Codes. Miss
ices Department
~nham also stated that the
a�
ing with ra/g,.
�
A require fir goofing
of e sso��uxl
ii/, ,
i,
is's X drywall rid the pets
try ran shoute heck with the
Ading departm iht for spec�.�c.^�
et its �r1f r
s Board then dscussed the
n, r>
proposal an,,, that the
^essory buildiryg be fireprodfei.
'
firman Basnik hen entertaiJeAs
s
d a motiori��j grant the
111111Uritioners
request for a
var�atern from ,ection 14.102.B.1
%11
i% %j
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
REQ
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a 4 foot separation
between the principal structure and an accessory structure. The Mount Prospect Zoning
Ordinance requires a 10 foot separation.
PLANN STS A�M CONCERNS
- -ING AND ZONING COMMEN
Summary of application: The applicants hope to convert an existing screen porch into a
sun -room. Because the use is changing from seasonal to permanent, and reconstruction is
necessary, the non -conforming status of the existing buildings must be remedied.
The accessory building, formerly used as a garage, is now used as a storage shed. The
separation between the existing buildings is four feet. The applicants will not be changing
the foundation footprint but will be reconstructing the walls of the screened porch.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: Staff notes that the lot coverage and
required yard setbacks meet Codes. No additional lot coverage is being requested so
drainage will not be altered. In addition, the distance between the existing buildings will
not be changed.
OTHER VILLAGE STAEE COMMENTS
The only major concern expressed by other staff is that the shed should be lined with 5/8"
Class X drywall for fireproofing.
SIMMARY4MOMMENDATION
Staff has no objections to this request but suggests approval be conditioned on fireproofing
the storage shed as requested by the Inspection Services Department.
DMC:hg
VI—A AGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC _
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ��-
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 11, 1991
CASE NO.: ZBA-2-V-91
APPLICANT: KENNETH AND KAREN FRUH
ADDRESS: 243 NORTH YATES LANE.
LOCATION MAP:
tea.
Q47
�-
-
34
RSL
77
PI;
w
PROPERTY
DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1
LAT SIZE: 84.5' x 131.04' = 10,757 sq. ft.
% COVERAGE: 28.4
F.A.R.: OZO
M21
CHA PQ
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER PC_
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JANUARY 11, 1991
SUBJECT: ZBA-2-V-91, KENNETH AND KAREN FRUH
LOCATION: 243 NORTH YATES LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variation application filed by Kenneth and Karen Fruh. A variation is requested from
Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 4 foot separation between the principal structure and an
accessory structure. The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires a 10 foot separation.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting'of January 24, 1991. At the
meeting, Kenneth Fruh presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Fruh explained
that he proposes to convert an existing screened porch into a sun -room for year round use.
Because the walls will be totally reconstructed, and the use 4s changing from seasonal to
permanent, the existing non -conforming separation must be remedied. He indicated that
the building foundation was not being changed, but the walls and roof would be totally
reconstructed because they are in need of repair.
Julie Farnham, Planner, noted that the acc(
codes require a 10 foot separation from
protection. She noted that reductions of a se.,
on providing adequate fireproofing.
structure is used as a storage shed and
rincipal building for purposes of fire
)n requirement are typically conditioned
She also noted that since the foundation is not being chang
is requested. The existing lot coverage of 28.49o' is well bel(
The Zoning Board discussed the request noting that the st
buildings would not be changed, but because of reconstructi(
separation must be recognized. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote,
recommends approval of the request to allow a four foot s
sun -room and an accessory building at 243 North Yates La
DMC:hg
, no additional lot coverage
the maximum 45% allowed.
ration between the existing
the existing non -conforming
e Zoning Board of Appeals
tration between a proposed
SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form the manner provide by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
350 E. KENSINGTON ROAD
Child World
The two lane paved driveway
and east sides of the building.
601 E. KENSINGTON ROAD
NutraSweet
The paved driveway adjacent to t
the building.
1400 E. KENSINGTON ROAD
Feehanville School
The paved circle drive to the west
801 W. KENSINGTON ROAD
Prospect High
The entire circular driveway loca,
entrances of the south side to Ke
the west and south driveways lo(
and south sides of said school fr(
Avenue.
1699 S. WALL STREET
Lake Center Plaza
Both lanes of Montgomery Street,
their entirety.
431 LAKEVIEW COURT
The two lane paved drive adjacent
104-112 E. LINCOLN and 310-348
The paved driveway adjacent to
401-549 E. LINCOLN STREET
Lions Park Condos
The paved driveway from William
designated parking areas.
to the curb lane on the north
east, south, and west sides of
of the school.
I on the front having exits and
ington Road. Also, both lanes of
ed along and adjacent to the west
Kensington Road to Forest
Nall Street and LaSalle Street in
to and around the building,
. MAPLE
id west of buildings.
Street to School
Street excluding
3O1417HAWTHCJRNECIRCLE
Oak Terrace Apartment
All paved driveways excluding designated parking areas.
1101'1103 HUNT CLUB DRIVE
Huntington Condos
The two lane paved driveway and oi,nu|or driveways adjacent to the
building.
500-502HUNT|NGTON COMMONS ROAD
Huntington Condos
The two lane paved driveway ground the property.
551-571 HUNT|NCSTON COMMONS ROAD
Huntington Towers
The two lanes of the paved driveways adjacent to the buildings as
well as the circular driveways.
GU1-G25HUNT|NGTONCOMMONS ROAD
Lakeside Condos
The paved driveways around the property.
700 W. HUNT|NGTONCOK4W1ON8 ROAD
Knights of Huntington
Both lanes of all the paved streets throughout the complex.
1-47 JUDITH ANN DRIVE
Judith Ann Tovxnhomes
Both lanes of the paved m||my and parking lots.
3O0E.KENSINGTON ROAD
Wild Stallion Cafe
The single lane paved driveway adjacent to and along the east and
west sides.
||]
1GG1FEEHANV)ULEDRIVE
Kensington Office Plaza � |/
The two lane paved driveway adjacent to the south and west sides of
the building.
1700-29 FOREST COVE DRIVE !�!
Forest Cove
The paved driveways located adjacent to andaround the perimeter of
the development. The paved drive between 1�723'1719 and 1701-
1705 Forest Cove Drive.
|/
GO5VV.GOLF ROAD
Trinity United Methodist
Paved driveway east and south of the building ` exc|uding designated
pe/king areas.
vv
1701-1755 W. GOLF ROAD
Golf Plaza |
The two lanes of the paved driveway adjacent to and around the
perimeter of the building and sidewalks except designated
"Customer Pick-up" area. �
1821VV.GOLF ROAD
Mount Shire Apartment
The paved driveways around the perimeter of the buildings including
the designated interior paved sidewalks between the buildings.
-2O9DW. GOLF ROAD
i
Peace Reformed Church
Paved driveway adjacent to the curb along the north side of the
building.
4DOE.GREGORY �
�
Life Christian Church/College
902 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Business Services'ides of the
The paved drives adjacent to the east and west s
buildings.
903 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Piher
The paved drive adjacent to the west side of the building.
1001 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Lees Marketing Inc. t to the east side of the building.
The .paved drive adjacen
1150 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Bang & Olufsen t to the east side of the building.
The paved drive adjacen
1250 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Toko
The paved drive to the west of the building.
1450 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Makita
The two lane paved drive adjacent to the east side of the building
1600 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
TDK jacent to the east and south sides ofthe
The paved driveway ad
building.
1601 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Kensington Commons and around the building.
The paved driveway adjacent to
1901 ESTATES DRIVE
Forest View School
All those curb lanes on both sides
of estates on north side of school.
west driveway, and south side
55 E. EUCLID AVENUE
First National Bank Mt. Prospect
The two lane paved drive adjacent to the south side of the building.
1600 E. EUCLID AVENUE
River Trails Pool
The entire paved driveway (exclusive of parking area).
1624 E. EUCLID AVENUE
Grace Lutheran Church
The paved driveway adjacent to
300 N. FAIRVIEW
Fairview School
The circular driveway on the
of Gregory Street to the west
851 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Gestetner
The paved lane adjacent to the
852 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
WCI Financial
The paved drive adjacent to the
891 FEEHANVILLE DRIVE
Cummings -Allison
Both lanes of the drive from
the parking lot.
around tne building.
ly extending from the south side
of Fairview Avenue.
th side of the building.
uth side of the building.
,le Drive to the south end of
1O0O1ObDS.EUMHURSTROAD
Golf Plaza U
The two lane driveway that is immediately adjacent to the building
and sidewalk on front side of building except for the designated
"customer pick-up~ area.
1400 N. EU0HURSTROAD
Orchard Vale Condos
Both lanes of the curved driveway adjacent to the front entrance of
the building, both lanes of the paved driveway throughout the parking
lot area and the one lane paved driveway adjacent to the north, west
and south sides of the building.
1452-58 N. ELK8HURST ROAD
Orchard Vale Tom/nhomeo
The east lane of the paved road commonly known as Woodridge Lane,
1500 S. EUNHURSTAOAD
Venture Department Store
The paved driveway immediately adjacent to and around the
perimeter of the building from Elmhurst Road to the perimeter
driveway around the building.
2300-2366 S. ELK8HURST ROAD
Colony Square Shopping Center
The two lane paved driveway adjacent to the south and east curb in
front of the building. Also, the paved driveway located behind the
building.
1D8.EMERSON
Mt. Prospect Library
The west curb of Emerson Street directly adjacent to the main
building entrance.
401-455 S. ELMHURST ROAD
Elmhurst Road Apartments
The two lane paved alley from Pine Street to Shabonee Trail.
999 N. ELMHURST ROAD
RANDHURST
Wards Auto Center
The paved driveway immediately adjacent to and around the
perimeter of the building.
999 N. ELMHURST ROAD
RANDHURST
Lorenzos
The paved driveway adjacent to the southeast side of the building
located at the southwest corner of the Randhurst Shopping Center.
999 N. ELMHURST ROAD
Randhurst Cinema
The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to the building and
sidewalk on the south side of the building.
999 N. ELMHURST ROAD
RANDHURST
Jewel Osco
The curb lane of the driveway adjacent to the! east, south and west
sides of the building.
999 N. ELMHURST ROAD
Randhurst Shopping Center
The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to and around the
entire perimeter, of the building and sidewalki of the building, except
the designated "customer pick-up" areas and the inner lane of the
underground drive in the basement.
301-385VV.DBNpSTER
Hawthorne Apartments
Both lanes of the paved driveway commonly known as Hawthorne
420VV.DEK4PSTER
All the curb |enea, as well as the easterly most and westerly most
lanes of -the parking lot at the south side of the building.
501-571 VK DEMPSTER
Pickwick Commons South
The two lane paved driveways throughout the development.
600-684 W. OEK8PSTER and 601-685 p|CKW|CK COURT
Pickwick Commons West
Both lanes of the curved driveway at the east end of the parking lot
between 800 W. Dempster and 601 Pickwick Court. Paved access
drive between the buildings from Unneman Rood to the east property
-1650DEMpSTER
Alpine Apartments
Driveway directly east of building. '
-1540 DEK4PSTER
Alpine Apartments
15 feet either side of the fire hydrant located on the northwest
corner of the building.
-1530[}EK8PSTER
Alpine Apartments
Driveway directly west of
'1520 DEN\PSTEH
Alpine apartments
15 feet in either direction
corner.
of the fire hydrant located on northeast
300 N.E[MHUHSTAVENUE
Northwest Convent Chu/ch
The paved driveways mdi000nt to and along the north and west sides
of the building.
1800 W. CENTRAL ROAD
Multigraphics
The paved driveway located adji
the building including the front
1701-1751 W. CHARIOT COURT
Pharrohs Apartments
Both lanes of paved driveway th
to and around the perimeter of
lar drive.
t the complex.
111 E. RAND ROAD
Citicorp
All paved drives around the perimeter of the 'building including the
entrance and exit drives onto Rand , Road.
475 ENTERPRISE;
The Colony Apartments e rty.
All paved driveways upon the prop
250 W, PARLIAMENT
Old Orchard Colony Country
The paved lane behind the buildin
building located at 250 Parliment
Picadilly Circle, Bridgeport Drive
Yarmouth.
901-1701 COTTONWOOD, 1501 S
Cottonwood Apartments
Driveway adjacent to and along
300 E. COUNCIL TRAIL
Lion's Park School
North side of Council between
1717-1777 CRYSTAL LANE
Crystal Towers
The two lanes of the paved di
the buildings. The single lane
at 1400 Yarmouth, and behind the
I
The roadways which include
Fairmont, Parliment and
SSE ROAD
south side of the buildings.
and School Streets,
ay locate I d around the perimeter of
ass road between buildings.
SOOE.CENTENNIAL
Centennial Apartment South
All paved drives adjacent to the building.
3OOVV.CENTRAL ROAD
UG' Off ffioe
The one lane paved driveway adjacent to the north curb of the
parking lot from the entrance on Central Road to Elmhurst Street and
the paved driveway adjacent to the north side of the building.
500 W. CENTRAL ROAD
Both sides of the driveway from the north line of Central Road to the
west property line of the rear parking lot....
603'715 W. CENTRAL ROAD
Central Village Condos '
The two lanes of the paved driveway between 707'709 W. Central
from the east end of VVhitegoto Circle to the north curb of the
parking lot. The two lanes of the paved alley adjacent to the south
side of 801 W. Central to the northeast corner of the parking lot
between 607 and 609 W. Central and the two lanes throughout the
parking lot.
8OOCENTRAL ROAD
Central Park Center
Paved driveway connecting {}entns| Rood and rear parking lot on east
side of building.
1O84E.CENTRAL ROAD
Walgreens
The paved drive adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building.
1400 E. CENTRAL ROAD
St. Emily's School
Both sides of the circular driveway located on the south side of the
school.
1441BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
yNan/e|
The paved drive � adjacent to the m
111EBU8SEAVENUE
First Chicago Bank of Mt. Prospe
The paved two lane drive around
1O5S.BUSSEROAD
Westbrook School
The one lane driveway on either
in front of school. Also, the dri
with entrances and exits off Bus
||
and west sides of the building.
.||
building4�
)|
e of the service and pickup area
/ay located adjacent to the school
Road.
around1400 S. BUSSE ROAD
Timberlake Apartments
The paved driveway located
except for the designated parking,ar
15ODS.BU8SEROAD
8t. Johns Apartments
The one lane immediately adjace
perimeter of the buildings inc|ud
Knights Bridge, Hadher|migh, VVhi
the designated parking areas.
555 CARBOY
Vanguard Tool
The pawed circular drive in front
1GO1VV.CARBOY
VVmADuguid Co'
The paved circle dhma in front of
1900-2000 G. CARBOY
Prospect Industrial Center
The two lane paved drive adj
the perimeter of the property
eas. '|1
J
\
to and around the entire
the private roads known as
Chaple and Canford Cliffs, except
7OOEBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Searle
Both lanes of the curved drive adjacent to the southwest corner of
the building.
8ODBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Mitsubishi
The paved lane adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building.
8D1BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Xyte|
Both lanes of the curved driveway adjacent to the southwest corner
of the building.
SOOBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Mitsubishi
The two lane paved drive adjacent to the south and east sides of the
building.
1D0UE.BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Graco
The paved drive along the east aide of the building.
11UOBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
The two lane paved drive adjacent to the west side of the building.
1200 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
The paved drive adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building.
1221BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
GTE
The paved drive odimognt to the oast and mouth sides of the building.
1331 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Kodak
The paved drive adjacent to the xvget side of the building.
14OOBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Kay-Ray/Senoa\|
The paved drive adjacent to and around the building.
1321N.BURNING! BUSH
SL Thomas Becket Church
The paved driveway which has ant
Lane and circles behind the bui\di
1313N.BURNING BUSH
Burning Bush Trails Park .
The two lane circular driveway in
1340 BURNING BUSH
Indian Grove School
The west side of Burning Bush La
the drives on the north and south
41Oand 412BUSINESS CENTER [
Research Products, Triangle Ma
The two lane paved drive throug
east sides of the building.
411BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE, 4-,
Kensington Office Center
The two lane paved drive throug
479 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
TQ
The paved drive adjacent to the
52OBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
International Beotho. Prospect
The two lane paved drive adjac,
55OBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Salton
The two lane paved drive to the
555 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
Charmi|es Technologies
The paved drive adjacent to and
|)
and exits on N. Burning Bush
�
front of the building.
(�
*g in front of the school, between
5idgs of the school.
[VE
atinQ w
ut the parking lot on the west and
�
BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE
ut the complex.
and west sides of the building.
aebaner |
to and west of the building.
||
of the building.
|/
||
umd the building.
1805 ASPEN
Robert Frost School
- The west side of Cypress Drive between Eva Lane and Front Drive
adjacent to the school.
' The circular driveway on the west side of the school.
79SN.B|ERMANCIRCLE
Patterson Dental
Both lanes of the driveway from Bierman N. Circle to the front
entrance of the building.
8OON.B|ERMANCIRCLE
Mitsubishi
The paved lane adjacent to and along the entire length of the north
side of the building.
15OOBISHOP COURT
Stenograph Corporation
The paved drive adjacent to and around the building.
1550 BISHOP COURT
Network Services
The paved driveway adjacent to the vvaat aide of the building.
91S-1O19BOXWOOD AND 5OODOGWOOD
Randxvood Towers Condominiums
The two lane paved driveway from Dogwood Lane to Boxwood Drive.
1474-1488S.BROWNSTONE LANE
Algonquin Lane Apartments
All of Brownstone Lane including the paved driveways between the
buildings.
805 N. BURNING BUSH
The east curb lane of Burning Bush Lane. between Kensington Road
and the near access driveway including the paved area along the
north side of the building.
1801 VV.ALG(]NQU|N
General Building
The two lane paved driveway imr
ediate|y adjacent to building.
�
1621-1681 W. ALGC}NQU|N
Plaza United Shopping Center
Paved driveway along north side of building of building). Paved
driveway aroundentire perimeter of the building.
//oo-//oIVV. nLU`JIvuxv
Crystal Court Shopping Center
Paved drive along the entire le
1761-1769 W. AUG(]NQU|N
Cinnamon Cove
Paved driveway adjacent to west
1803-1843 W. AbGONQU|N
Brianwood Plaza
Paved driveway directly south of
1960-2036 W. ALGCJNQU|N
Prospect Commons `
The paved driveways and sidem
perimeter of the building.
|
2070-2100 W. ALGONCJU|N
Algonquin Trails Apartments
All paved driveways located at �
900EARDYCE `
Centennial North
Paved driveways west, north and
2O1ARTHUR AVENUE
�
Commonwealth Edison
The lane adjacent to and imnnecli'
of the south side of the building,
e of building.
building (entire length),
|�
a�a��to��a�urd�e
' U
'1
U
'1
100 W. Algonquin Road,
east of bu|dinQ.
J
itely surrounding the entire
n
u
350N.WOLF ROAD
Winona School ofPhotography
The paved circular driveway adjacent to the front of and the one lane
adjacent to the south side of the building.
900N.WOLF ROAD
Northwest Assembly of God
The paved drive adjacent to the north side of the building.
1OOOMiWOLF ROAD
River Trails Junior High School
The paved circular driveway and the paved roadway adjacent to the
east, south and west sides of the school.
333NiRAND ROAD
Francis Cadillac
The paved drive adjacent to the building and along the perimeter of
625 SLAWIN COURT
Heidelberg Eastern
The paved drive adjacent to the
18 S. SCHOOL STREET
St. Pauls Lutheran School
The west side of School Street
located 196' north thereof.
side of the building.
Busse Ave. and a point
1701 W. VICTORIA DRIVE
Jamestown Estates
The two lane paved roadways throughout the project, including the
following streets: Victoria Drive; Annamarie Drive; Marrishill Drive,
Hazelhill Drive; Phillip Drive; and Dennis Drive.
280-290 N. WESTGATE ROAD
Westgate Apartments
The two lane paved driveway throughout the development including
the curved driveways.
1699 WALL STREET
Both lanes of the driveway im
the building from Montgomery
590 N. WHEELING ROAD
Both sides of the building immed
the building from Wheeling Road
600 N. WHEELING ROAD
The paved circular drive in front
699 N. WHEELING! ROAD
Both lanes of the driveway immf
of the building from Wheeling Ro
30-226 W. WIMBOLTON DRIVE
The north curb of the paved road.
ly adjacent to the west side of
to LaSalle Street.
fly adjacent to the north side of
the parking lot entrance.
the building.
iately adjacent to the south side
Jto the east parking lot.
2O1VV.RAND ROAD
Forest City
The two lanes of the paved driveway adjacent to and around the
perimeter of the building and aidevvo|ho of the property.
7OOVV.RAND ROAD
Old Orchard Country Club
The paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the '
8O2RIVER ROAD
McDonald Condos
The paved lane to the north of the buildings and the two lane paved
drive along the south and west sides of the buildings.
580SLAVVN COURT
1255NiPROSPECT AVENUE
Kenilworth
The paved alley connecting
�
'|
Kenilworth and VVanedy,
1E.RAND ROAD
LFish Company
The two paved lanes adjacent to and around the perimeter of the
200 E. RAND ROAD
Holiday Inn
The two lane paved driveway adjacent to the west and north sides of
the building"fro"=. ....d ..~.d to Kensington R-__
3OOERAND ROAD �
K8cBridea
The easterly paved driveway adjacent to the building from Rand Road
to Kensington Road and the circular drive adjacent to the front of
said building, except designated parking areas.
750 E. RAND ROAD
Courtesy Home Center
The two lanes of the paved driveway adjacent to and around the
building. �
823ERAND ROAD �
Thunderbird Bowl
The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to the front of the
building.
827 E. RAND ROAD
The two lane driveway immedi acent to the building and
sidewalk on the front of the building.
83O-O34E.RAND ROAD
Paved driveway adjacent to the south, oaed and north sides of the
Meadows Park Pool
The circular drive on the north side of the building,
7OOK8BER
Bt Cecelia Catholic Church
The paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the
1000-1145 MT. PROSPECT PLAZA
K8L Prospect Plaza
The two lane driveway that is immediately adjacent to the building
and sidewalk on the front of the building. The two lane driveway
immediately adjacent to the west side of the building and the two
lane drive adjacent to the south side of the plaza.
110ONVVHIGHWAY
Paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building.
1835VV.PHEASANT TRAIL
John Jay School
The easterly most side of the paved driveway on the north side of
the building.
416E.PROSPECT AVENUE
Prospect Apartments
Paved driveway adjacent to and around sides and rear of building,
501 E. PROSPECTAVE. Prospect Gardena
All paved driveways throughout the complex except for designated
parking spaces.
601-605 E. PROSPECT AVENUE
Timber Lana Apartments
Both lanes of the paved driveway to the east of 803 Prospect Ave.
and the paved driveways in the parking lot south of complex
excluding designated parking areas.
700 W, LINCOLN STREET -up
Lincoln School on both sides of the service and pick
The one lane paved drivewayis located immediatelyarea in front of the school, which drivewaynces and exits off Lincoln
adjacent to the said school with entra
located adjacent
street. Also, the paved circular drive to the east
side of the school with entrance and'exit Off Candota Ave.
1101 S. LINNEMAN ROAD
St. John's Lutheran School ent to the front of the buildings.
The circular paved driveway adjac
1900 W. LONNQUIST BOULEVARD
Oliver W. Holmes Schoolon the south side of the
Ali those curb lanes of the circular driveay
a on the north side of school,
school. Also,
the entire blacktop are w
2-40 N. MAIN STREET
Central Plaza
The one lane adjacent to the building and sidewalk on the east side
of the building and the two lanes on the north side of the building.
34 S. MAIN STREET
Two lanes adjacent to the north side of the building,
1701-1725 W. MANSARD LANE
Mansard Lane Apartments t the Masoutheast corner of 1701
The paved alley from the curof b a
Mansard west to the north curb nsard Lane.
411 S. MAPLE STREET
Lions Park Community Center side of the property.
The circular driveway on the west
1200 NW HIGHWAY
Meadows Condos north of the building.
Paved driveway adjacent to curb
CAF/
12/20/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION XIV OF CHAPTER 18
ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT Pit
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE'
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2014 entitled "Schedule XIV Fire
Lanes" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting said
Section 18.2014 in its entirety and substituting therefor the
following; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2014 shall be and
read as follows:
it Sec. 18.2014. Schedule XIV - Fire Lanes. In accordance with
Section 18.1321.A, and when signs are erected
giving notice thereof, no person shall at any time block or
obstruct the following described districts, streets,
driveways, areas or parts thereof:
N
Chapter 8
Page 2 of 2
said Article XII of Chapter 8 shall be and read as follows:
11 ARTICLE XII
HOME RULE MUNICIPAL SERVICE OCCUPATION TAX
U50WW1*W
8.1201. Purpose
8.1202. Imposition of Tax
8.1203. Collection of Tax
Sec. 8.1201. Purpose. A Home Rule Municipal Service Occupation
Tax is established for the purpose of defraying a
portion of the cost of storm water management and other capital
improvement costs as may be designated by the President and Board
of Trustees.
Sec. 8.1201. Imposition of Tax. A Home Rule Service Occupation
Tax is imposed upon all persons in the Village
engaged in the business of making sales of service at the rate of
one quarter of one percent (.25%) of the selling price of all
tangible personal property transferred by said service persons as
an incident to a sales of service, in accordance with the
provisions of the Home Rule Municipal Service Occupation Tax Act,
Chapter 24, Section 8-11-5 of the Illinois Revised Statutes.
Sec. 8.1203. Collection of Tax. , That the taxes being the subject
of this Article XII and all civil penalties that may
be assessed as an incident thereto, shall be collected and enforced
by the Department of Revenue of the State of Illinois. The
Department of Revenue shall have full power to administer and
enforce the provisions of this Article. 11
SECTION THREE: That this Village Clerk is hereby directed to file
a certified copy of this Ordinance with the Illinois Department of
Revenue on or before the first day of June, 1991.
SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect on September 1, 1991, after its passage, approval and
publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1/29/91
/caf
• ZVOWLE1 &a) an m0p
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Chapter 8 entitled
ed "Village Government
Miscellaneous Provisions" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto Article XI
entitled "Home Rule Municipal Retailers' Occupation Tax" ; so that
hereinafter said Article XI of Chapter 8 shall be and read as
follows:
ARTICLE XI
HOME RULE MUNICIPAL RETAILERS' OCCUPATION TAX
SECTION:
8.1101. Purpose
8.1102. Imposition of Tax
8.1103. Collection Tax
Sec. 8.1101. Purpose. A Home Rule Municipal Retailers'
Occupation Tax is established for the purpose of
defraying a portion of'the cost of storm water management and other
capital improvement costs as may be designated by the President and
Board of Trustees.
See. 8.1102. Imposition of tax. A Home Rule Retailers' Occupation
Tax is imposed upon all persons engaged in the
business of selling tangible personal property other than an item
of tangible person property titled or registered with an agency of
the State of Illinois' government, at retail in the Village at the
rate of One quarter of one percent (.25%) of the gross receipts
from such sales made in the course of such business in accordance
with the provisions of the Home Rule Municipal Retailers'
Occupation Tax Act of Chapter 24, Section 8-11-1 of the Illinois
Revised Statutes.
See. 8.1103. Collection of Tax. That the taxes being the subject
of this Article XI and all civil penalties that may
be assessed as an incident thereto, shall be collected and enforced
by the Department of Revenue of the State of Illinois. The
Department of Revenue shall have full power to administer and
enforce the provisions of this Article. 11
SECTION TWO: That Chapter 8 entitled "Village Government
Miscellaneous Provisions" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto Article XII
entitled "Municipal Service Occupation Tax"; so that hereinafter
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W. BUSSE
TIMOTHY J CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R VAN DEEM
THEODORE J WATTENBERG Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON [DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A FIELDS
I have now received two proposals for rewiring of the PA system in
the meeting room as we discussed and the Mayor and Village Board
have requested. In addition, I also requested that these vendors
recommend a new microphone system to alleviate the ambient noise
and feedback problems associated with the "pancake type"
microphones we currently use on the Board console. Both vendors
felt that the Shure AMS8000 system would suit our needs.
After meeting with both vendors and reviewing their proposals, it
is my recommendation that we purchase the package offered by ROSCOR
for $4,773.00. This package includes rewiring and documentation
of the PA system as well as installation of a new gaited microphone
system. Since ROSCOR was the original supplier for the current
system, they are most familiar with how it should operate in
conjunction with our other equipment.
BG Electronics was a firm that Karen Giet used to modify the PA
system after it was originally installed. Since that time, we have
experienced delays in getting service, proposals, and quotes.
While this was primarily due to the representative assigned to us,
Nancy Morgan and I have personally met with Bill Green, President
of BG Electronics, and his technicians. While they are
knowledgeable in this field, it took several trips and requests
just to get a proposal, whereas ROSCOR was very thorough and prompt
in responding.
ROSCOR also submitted a proposal for a wireless microphone system.
While this would be a top of the line system, it would not give me
the flexibility of taking the system portable as the hard -wired
system would.
Rhone: 708 / 392-6000
Fax: 708 / 392-6022
MEMO
TO:
John F.
Dixon, Village Manager
FROM:
Cheryl L. Pasalic, Cable Television Administrator 0JZ
DATE:
January
15, 1991
RE:
Village
Board Room PA and Microphones
I have now received two proposals for rewiring of the PA system in
the meeting room as we discussed and the Mayor and Village Board
have requested. In addition, I also requested that these vendors
recommend a new microphone system to alleviate the ambient noise
and feedback problems associated with the "pancake type"
microphones we currently use on the Board console. Both vendors
felt that the Shure AMS8000 system would suit our needs.
After meeting with both vendors and reviewing their proposals, it
is my recommendation that we purchase the package offered by ROSCOR
for $4,773.00. This package includes rewiring and documentation
of the PA system as well as installation of a new gaited microphone
system. Since ROSCOR was the original supplier for the current
system, they are most familiar with how it should operate in
conjunction with our other equipment.
BG Electronics was a firm that Karen Giet used to modify the PA
system after it was originally installed. Since that time, we have
experienced delays in getting service, proposals, and quotes.
While this was primarily due to the representative assigned to us,
Nancy Morgan and I have personally met with Bill Green, President
of BG Electronics, and his technicians. While they are
knowledgeable in this field, it took several trips and requests
just to get a proposal, whereas ROSCOR was very thorough and prompt
in responding.
ROSCOR also submitted a proposal for a wireless microphone system.
While this would be a top of the line system, it would not give me
the flexibility of taking the system portable as the hard -wired
system would.
gem
Since the total cost of the BG Electrm
$5,035.00 and the�.cost of the ROS OR propo,
my recommendation that we proceed with the I
has also offered to let us demo the microp
sure we are satisfied.
I an enclosing oPies of the proposals
originals) and will await further directio
FM
proposals would be
is $4,773.00, it is
A proposal. ROSCOR
system first to be
tted (I have the
PROPOSAL
kEL1156 D
Company Village of Mount Pros ect Page._.,._
Attention Ms. Cheryl Pasalic Prepared By ion Ulfsrud
Proposal Title Wired Mixer system r306909P11 Date
Item Qty. Description Unit Price
1 8 Shure AMS -28 Lavalier Microphone 162.00
2 8 Shure C25E Microphone Cable 25.00
3 1 �Shure AMS -8000 Eight Channel Automated
Mixer
Equipment Total
Installation of Proposed Equipment
Re -work and Documentation of PA System
System Total
TERMS OF SALE ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PAGE.
01-14-91
Amount
1,296.00
200.00
1,995.00
3,491.00
500.00
782.00
4,773.00
Roscor Corporation 1061 Feehanville Drive Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056 (312) 539-7700 FAX: (312) 299-4206
Village of Mout Prospect [306909P] 2 of 2
C()rinanv P Page ---
VCem
Ory. Description Unit Price
Freight and Insurance from the point
of origin to destination will be
prepaid and added.
"THIS QUOTATION IS VALID FOR 30 DASfl
I have read the Terms and conditions on
the reverse side of this proposal.
Accepted for
by
Maine
Title
Accepted Roscor
by
Maine
Tule
TIERMF OF SALE ON ACXFPSE SIDE OF THIS PAG[
Roscor Corporation ,en,4uiviiie Dnve
mount P'asce�v hllnrys 6qp�,6 312;
3M
m"u"
`.
ELECTRONICS, INC. p"od"m°
!� 552OVKThuhyAvenue.Gkokie.|LO0O77°(7O8)O79�5OO°Fax�O8 079'8841
Proposal No. 91-011
January 9, 1991
Village of mount Prospect R E C EVV E D
100 S. Emerson
JAN 141UUY
Mount Prospect, IL. 60056
wILLAGE OF MOUNT
Attn: Cheryl Paual10 CARE .,w°SOON
Subject: Automatic micing system
Dear Cheryl,
This is the formal proposal that follows up our faxed quote to you for a Shure
AMS automatic mixer system.
EQUIPMENT AND COT
1) 1 Shure AMS 8000 automatic mixer system.
2) 8 Shuns AHG -28 lavalier microphones.
We propose tofurnish and install the above system and interface it properly with
your existing public address system.
Everything is inoluded.'- even a one year warranty.
The total package price is $4,372.00.
Thank you again. We hope this information helps. If you have any queations,
please call me at your convenience.
4
Sincerely,
B%KElertonics, Inc. 7 7/��
Bi
reident
BG/cs
Accepted by:
Date:
Please sign and return a copy of this proposal to our office. We will contact
you upon receiving u signed copy to coordinate installation.
Thank you.
`
� ��
^ w�m�
�
5520
Proposal No. 90-e33
November 29, 1e90
CTRONICS, INC.
3�
Products
G7o25VneFax (7D8)573 -8S41
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL. BE C 0 3 1990
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Attn: Cheryl Pasalit CABLE TV 010SION
Subject: Upgrading Sound system
Dear Cheryl,
Based on our recent two hour visit and evaluation of your system, our technicians
recommend the following.
1) 1 double gang �02 box.
2) 1 recording jack 1/4" and female mic input.
3) 1 D3F microphone input - direct feed to Ramsa mixing board.
4) 1 lot conduit.
5) 1 lot shielded microphone cable.
6) remount and clean up your existing rack.
7) rework existing Ramsa output circuits.
���igure the system,
----1 package—.$0. This will split the
including labor, parts, wire, and material is
house/senior citizens PA from the cable TV syste*.
Thank you again tha opportunity to send you this information.
i)
in�ce ely,
��
�
/
Bi Green|
jresidenv /
Accepted by:
Date:
a signed copy to coordinate installation.
Specialists in professional sound, music and pagirtg:systems.
-1 1 TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LTD.
830 NORTH MEACHAM ROAD - SCHAUMBURG, ILLINOIS 60173-4922
708*605-9600
(FAX) 708-605-9610
January 28, 1991
Mr. John F. Dixon
Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Reference: Professional Engineering Services Proposal
"COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT" Review
Dear Mr. Dixon:
We are pleased to submit this Proposal for Professional
Engineering Services for the review and evaluation of the refer-
enced report. The primary purpose of this review and evaluation
and our scope of services is as follows:
1. That the engineering methods used to develop the recommended
plan for stormwater management are generally sound.
2. That the recommended plan alternatives for improved
flood control in each of the Weller Creek, Feehanville and
Des Plaines River drainage areas are most viable.
3. A detailed review will be made of two of the recommended
plans to determine their workability and accuracy of the
estimate of cost.
4. A field 'review will be made of all of the recommended
improvements.
5. A letter report will be prepared with our findings by
February 8, 1991 and presented at a February 12, 1991
meeting of the President and Village Board of Trustees.
We will need the full cooperation of the Village Public Works
staff and Consultant in supplying data and in the scheduling
of meetings to complete this work by the aforementioned date.
Mi. Herbert L. Greeks Page 2 January 28, 1991
We propose to furnish these engineering services.on an hourly
basis at the rates::shown on Atttacbments "A" and "B" for a fee
not to exceed $8,500.00. This fee includes all direct
labor costs, overhead and, burden, direct ccts, and profit.
Thank you for the opportunity to submit this Proposal to
serve you on this important project.
Very truly yours,
TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LTD.
George T. March,P.E.
President
GTM:slz
attachment
",TILLAGE OF MOUNT P"s�iOSPEOT
Accepted by:
Date;
ATTACHMENT A
HOURLY RATES
CONSULTANT'S REGULAR STAFF
CLASSIFICATION
HOURLY
RATE
Principal in Charge $ 92.50
Project Manager $ 68.70
Chief Structural Engineer $ 72.20
Project Engineer $ 54.10
Senior Design Engineer $ 48.85
Design Engineer $ 42.25
Survey Crew Chief $ 39.50
Senior Drafter $ 38.00
Technician $ 38.00
Clerical/Word Processor $ 29.50
NOTE: Hourly rates listed above include direct labor, payroll
burden, overhead, and profit.
CLASSIFICATION
Principal in Cha
Project Engineer
Design Engineer
Secretary
ATTACHMENT �1
MANHOUR ESTIMATE
IVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT
HOURS
HOURLY RATE
COST
32
$ 92.50
$
2,960.00
76
$ 54.10
$
4,111.60
28
$ 42.25
$
1,183.00
6
$ 29.50
$
177.00
$
8,431.60
Use
$
8,500.00
Mount prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W CrrV USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: January 29, 1991
SUBJECT: Storm Water Management Study
Wheeling Road/Euclid Avenue
Last spring, a report was prepared identifying flooding areas
within our community. The Boxwood apartments adjacent to North
Wheeling Road was identified as one of the problem areas, but
was deleted from the initial study phase, as it qualified for
Community Block Grant Funding.
Attached is a proposal from R.J.N. Environmental Associates,
Inc. to conduct a flood management study in the Boxwood/Wheeling
area at a cost not to exceed $9,750. R.J.N. Environmental Asso-
ciates, Inc. is the consulting firm currently under contract for
a Village -wide storm water management study. As such, their
knowledge and experience within our community should be benefi-
cial in preparing this study.
Community Development Block Grant funds in the amount of $10,000
were allocated in the current budget for this proposed contract
under Account Code No. 23-062-06-8015. 1 recommend that the
contract be awarded to R.J.N. Environmental Associates Inc. in
an amount not to exceed $9,750, in accordance with their propos-
al of January 24, 1991.
HLW/td (WHLNG—EU.STD)
attach.
c: Director Planning & Zoning
Director Finance
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
January 24, 1991
Mr. David Clements
Director of Planning and Zoning
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services
Wheeling Road/Euclid Avenue
Stormwater Management Study
Dear Mr. Clements:
In accordance with the letter request from Mr. Michael Sims of
January 14, 1991 and follow-up discussions with Mr. Sims and
Mr. Herb Weeks, RJN Environmental is pleased to present this
proposal for the subject project.
Based on a preliminary inspection of the area and review of
available maps, we understand that stormwater runoff collects on
Wheeling Road between Cedar Lane and Euclid Avenue. During
moderate rainfall events, stormwater travels easterly toward
Wheeling Road resulting in flooding of multifamily housing
basements and excessive parking lot flooding. In addition,
excessive overland flooding occurs on Wheeling Road between
Cedar Lane and Euclid Avenue, and at an adjacent elementary
school.
The area tributary to Wheeling Road between Cedar Lane and
Euclid Avenue is approximately bounded by the Randhurst Shopping
Center on the east, Euclid Avenue on the north, Westgate Road on
the west, and Kensington Road on the south. The total area of
the basin is approximately 110 acres.' Storm drainage along
Wheeling Road is provided by a separate storm sewer ranging from
10 inches to 18 inches -in -diameter. Stormwater generated in
this basin is conveyed to either McDonald Creek or the
Feehanville Ditch. Both of these receiving streams are
tributary to the Des Plaines River.
RJN Environmental is familiar with the project area, and our
experience with recent similar projects for the Village will
provide an expeditious and professional approach. We also have
working relationships with the various regulatory agencies (e.g.
MWRDGC, IEPA, FEMA, IDOT, COE).
202 W. FRONT STREET
WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60187
(708) 682-4777
Mr. David Clements
january 24, 1991
Pace TWO
9 Environmental proposes to investigate the study area i
velop feasible alternatives for improved stormwater mane
ntrol. The study will include preliminary cost estimat(
nstruction of improvements and a recommended plan.
overview of the proposed work tasks for the study are i
llows:
1. Project Initiation
The project will be initiated by collecting backgroul
data. Available data kill be reviewed concerning th"
existing storm sewer system, and receiving streams is
project vicinity. it is assumed that the topoqraphi
information provided by the village is sufficient fo:
Purpose of analyzing drainage patterns within the st
area. Village records and information from other
agencies including Citizens Utilities, IDOT-Division
Water Resources, and IDOT-District I would also be
collected and reviewed. Village Public Works person
would be interviewed to further define the condition
operation of existing facilities during storm events
2. Field Investigation
RJN Environmental will perform limited field
investigations to verify elevations of critical
structures such as manholes and storm inlets. In
addition, the project team will inspect the area to
mation concerning the
obtain first hand infor behavic
operation of existing facilities. it is anticipated
television inspection of some storm sewer lines may
necessary, and that the Village would perform this u
with their equipment and provide video tapes for reN
by RJN Environmental.
Mr. David Clements
January 24, 1991
Page Three
3. Evaluation of Existing System
The objective of this task is to evaluate the conveyance
capabilities and behavior of the existing storm sewer
system. A hydraulic capacity analysis would be performed
to determine the extent and approximate degree of
existing storm protection. The impact of runoff from the
Randhurst Shopping Center on the project area would be
determined. In addition, a comparison of projected flows
tributary to the storm sewer to actual pipe capacity
would be made.
4. Analysis of Alternatives
This task would involve analysis of the information and
formulation of alternatives for improved stormwater
management control. Preliminary cost estimates would be
prepared for most feasible alternatives and a comparison
would be made of the alternatives.
Alternatives that may be considered for evaluation
include storage of stormwater, parallel relief sewers,
and construction of stormwater pumping facilities. For
example, it may be feasible to construct an underground
storage facility in a multifamily building parking lot
that would provide increased protection against excessive
flooding and basement flooding in the project area.
Alternatives will be evaluated for 10, 25, and 50 year
storm events.
5. Final Recommendations and Report
The final major work task would involve refining the
recommendations after input from the village. A draft
report would be prepared together with engineering
documentation, recommendations, cost estimates, and
exhibits. After discussion with village officials for
review of the draft report, a final report would be
prepared and submitted. Specific items that would be
included in this phase of the project are as follows:
A. summarize recommend alternatives,
cost estimates, and benefits.
B. Develop a preliminary and prioritized
capital improvement program.
Mr. David clemen
January 24, 1991
Page Four
C. Prepare a draft engineering report
with a description of facilities,
recommendations, cost estimate and
anticipated benefits.
I
D. Submit and discuss draft report with
Village representatives.
E. Prepare and submit twenty copies of
the Final Report.
F. Attend one regularly scheduled
meeting to present recommendations to
elected officials and one
public I \information public relations
meeting.
RJN Environmental is available to initiate the study immediately.
it is anticipated that approximately eight weeks will be required
to complete the study and submit the draft report.
Engineering cost for the study is proposed at a not -to -exceed cost
of $9,750 based on the scope of work described herein. Actual
compensation would be on a time and expense basis. Participation
in Board or Public meetings beyond the two meetings included above
would be as an extra and on a time and expense basis.
Payments to RJN Environmental shall be made monthly upon receipt of
a combined status report and invoice to be submitted to the village
by RJN Environmental. Invoices shall be due and payable within
thirty (30) days, of each billing.
Following completion of the study phase, final design services
would be performed together with any regulatory agency review.
Contractor bidding- process would then proceed, followed by the
actual construction. Based on previous experience it is not
possible to determine, at this time, the extent of recommended
improvements, construction costs and the engineering cost
requirements beyond this study phase. These elements can be
determined after the study phase and would be discussed in the
study report. We would expect, subject to timing of construction
funding, that the construction can be initiated in 1991 and
completed in 1992.
Mr. David Clements
January 24, 1991
Page Five
We believe our performance on similar projects for the Village
demonstrates our qualifications and capabilities. Designated RJN
Environmental personnel who participated on previous similar
Village projects will also be participating engineers for this
project. Mr. Randall L. Patchett, will be the designated Project
Manager with Ms. Catherine L. Morley, as a Project Engineer. Other
RJN Environmental engineers and field personnel will also
participate.
We trust this proposal meets with your approval. If acceptable,
one fully executed copy of this proposal will authorize us to
proceed with the work. If you prefer, a formal agreement can be
prepared for your review.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look
forward to providing the described services. Should you have any
questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate
to contact us.
Very truly yours,
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
/Richard Bodner, Ph.D.
Vice President
RLB: daf
cc: Mr. Herbert L. Weeksv/
Director of Public Works
ACCEPTED FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Name
Title
Date
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
January 25, 1991
Mr. David Clements
Director of Planning and Zoning
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Subject: Schedule of Engineering Hourly Fees and Charges
Wheeling Road/Euclid Avenue
Stormwater Management Study
Dear Mr. Clements:
Attached is the current "Schedule of Hourly Fees and Charges"
that is applicable to the RJN Environmental Associates, Inc.,
proposal of January 24, 1991 for the subject project. This
schedule will be used for the basic scope of services and for
time associated with any extra meetings described on page 3 of
the proposal.
We trust this information is satisfactory for your purposes at
this time. Please call if you have any questions.
Very truly yours,
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
ichard L. Bodner, Ph.D.
Vice President
RLB:daf
Enclosure
cc: Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
202 W. FRONT STREET
WHEA:70N. ILLINOIS 60187
(708) 682-477
ENVIRONMENTALASSOCIATES, INC.
)ULE OF HOURLY FEES AND CHARGES
FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
I. Compensation for personnel used in the performance of
Engineering Services shall be in accordance with the
following hourly fees:
Principal Engineer $95.00
Senior', Engineer $70.00
Engineer $60.00
Field Supervisor $43.00
Draftsperson $45.00
Computer Supervisor $45.00
Field Technician $33.00
clerical $25.00
Travel time will be charged in accordance with the
foregoing schedule.
II. Compensation for expense items and other charges
incurred in connection with the performance of the
work shall be in accordance with the fallowing
schedule:
Travel ,and Lodging Expenses Net Cost
Automobile/Field Vehicle $0.24/mile
Company Field Vehicle $0.24/mile
Outside Equipment Rental, Net Cost plus 10%
Laboratory Work, 'Soils Testing
Analysis, Sub -Consultants,
Testing Supplies, and Printing
III. Use of the in-house computer shall be charged on the
basis of connect time, CPU (Central Processing Unit)
time, and di=sk storage.
January 1991
AGENDA
SAFETY COMMISSION
VILLAGE HALL
100 S. EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
x':30 P.M.
FEBRUARY 4th, 1991
THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION,
FEBRUARY 4TH, 1991, HAS BEEN CANCELLED.
Rhone: 708 / 392-6000
Fax: 706 / 392-6022
A G E N D A
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
February 6, 1991
Trustees# Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P. M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 2, 1991 MEETING
IV. SUBDIVISIONS
A. River -Euclid Resubdivision, 2020 East Euclid Avenue.
AND Development Code Modifications - Street Lights
B. Plat of Easement, River Trails Junior High School,
1000 Wolf Road - Sidewalk Easement
V. COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development Committee Mr. Boege
B. Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern
C. Development Code Committee Mr. Kloster
D. Text Amendment Committee Mr. Velasco
VI. OLD BUSINESS
Vii. NEW BUSINESS
A. Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 1991
Application Budget Hearing
VIII. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W. BUSSE
TIMOTHY J CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
THEODORE J WATTENSERG
Village of
Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A FIELDS
Rhone: 708 / 392-6000
Fax: 706 / 392-6022
A G E N D A
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
February 6, 1991
Trustees# Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P. M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF JANUARY 2, 1991 MEETING
IV. SUBDIVISIONS
A. River -Euclid Resubdivision, 2020 East Euclid Avenue.
AND Development Code Modifications - Street Lights
B. Plat of Easement, River Trails Junior High School,
1000 Wolf Road - Sidewalk Easement
V. COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development Committee Mr. Boege
B. Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern
C. Development Code Committee Mr. Kloster
D. Text Amendment Committee Mr. Velasco
VI. OLD BUSINESS
Vii. NEW BUSINESS
A. Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 1991
Application Budget Hearing
VIII. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
IX. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 3-V-91
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: January 24, 1991
William Salemi
829 Heritage
January 8, 1991
Variation from Section
14.102.B.4 to allow a 144 Square
foot storage shed.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioners is requesting a variance from Section 14.102.B.1
to all a 144 square foot storage shed. The Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance limits the size of storage sheds to 120
square feet.
The petitioner, William Salemi of 829 Heritage, presented his
case stating that he obtained a permit to construct a 10 x 12
foot storage shed and had workers from his construction
company build the shed while he was on vacation. Mr. Salemi
stated that they constructed the shed to 12 x 12 and he was
not notified until an inspection :as made. Mr. Salemi then
stated that the shed is almost completed and to bring the
shed to Code he would have to tear it down.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the Inspection Services Department inspected the
shed and noted that the size was too large. The applicant
would like to keep the shed at the present size and the
height is 8'11". Miss Farnham stated that staff had no
objections.
Chairman Basnik then read a letter from Mr. Marty Hasting of
Heritage Drive, stating that he objects to the height of the
shed. Miss Farnham stated that the height meets Code.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
l %ii
1 if/
% '1''
l j %jai
1�
r o;
ZBA-3-V-91
January 24, 1991
it /l Page 2 of 2
M
!'
' li
ers requ t for a 144 sq re foot/� ed.
on mavedr Mr. Cassidy seo dd �j"
l 'r
NIP
L CALL: S: Lannon, Sr, % ther, C tidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, T4 snik ;H,
"% YS: None
a r r 1 e d b a vote of 6 4. ,
l
.on then �ved to prepar�*,Resalut' Number Z-3-91
Ur
,d the Zo"�%s.ng Board of A�eals ap S
WE of the
.ers requ rpt for a 144 scQaare foo^tllhed. Mr.
;er secon d. % Y
'fi
.L CALL: �ES. Lannon, "Cassidy, Br# hers, Brettrager,
o;,
Skowron, L ,
YS: None
lel
varried b a vote of 6 0*�!,*'
�� 1, �i/
k "4ic elle Th"" �on
Reca'T''ding S;" " tar
rile
I
tt
r V
iO
i, 1
it
h
pill
All
,1
V
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 1-V-91
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: January 24,1991
Thomas Buckman
212 N. Dale
January 8, 1991
Variation from Section
14,102.B.2 to allow a 4'
setback for a sideyard for a
shed.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioners is requesting a variance from Section 14.102.B.2
to allow a 4' setback for a shed rather than 5' allowed by
Code.
The petitioner, Thomas Buckman of 212 N. Dale, presented his
case stating that he had recently received a variation for
lot coverage to accommodate a storage shed and had originally
planned to move the shed to meet the 5' setback. Mr. Buckman
stated that upon inspection he was notified that the shed was
indeed only 4' from the lot line instead of the required 5'.
Mr. Buckman stated that instead of moving the shed he is
requesting a variance for the 4' setback.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitioner did not include the request on his
prior application because he was going to meet the 5'
requirement. Miss Farnham stated the because of the roof
overhang on the shed he cannot move the shed any closer to
the garage. Miss Farnham stated that the shed is located in
the corner of the lot behind the garage and a 4' hedge exists
along the south and west property lines to help visually
screen the shed form adjoining properties. Miss Farnham also
stated that the Engineering department notes that no
easements exist along the west of south property lines.
i
1
t
i
5sidy quest11"
oned if the f
4r. Clement stated -that.
ions on acclssory structu
ioned that o otherrrstruc
ty. The petitioner agreed
li
an Basnik then entertane
oners requeIt for a varia
ow a 4' setack for an ac
other struc ures being bu
ettrager moved. -Mr. Lannb
OLL CALL: AV ES : Lannon, B
AV
Skowron,
NV A', YS" None"
carried byla vote of 6_0
owron moved?to prepare Re
the Zoning Board of Appe
oners reque'%t for a 4' se
e
ettrager sonded.
OLL CALL: A�'ES : Lannon, B
Skowron,f
J:
YS : Nona
i
carried b l a vote of 6-0
I;
mi
Re
A
f
Y
1
i
�i
i
1
1UP
l
9
ji
1411
i, m
1
J BA -1-V-91
0
anuary 24, 1991
,i Page 2 of 2
TAVO
o%
irk departt reviewed the
tk fire d'i rtment has no
r Chair ily Basnik
i
tt�i`es be a ;�t�wed on the
i
i%
d motion grant the
tion from tion 14.102.B.2
csor,y st ture conditioned
i on the m .
i'
n seconded'% r
r %' hers CaO dy, Brettrager,
Bnik
ii j
�/
i/� N
t/ %
i/
.iite
s� ution '41P/N z-1-91 to
a approv l;jof the
tVAck to a o mmodate a shed.
G
iy� �/
%i
r hers, Cslidy, Brettrager,
S snik Ni"
V
i' o
delle Tho on
c0
3ing Sdary
I
1j
jEx
I f
OF, jof 5131
o
i' %% j
j
Flu",
FIR '% l
UP
f 1
IF
1
t
j
/ i
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 91-V-90
Hearing Date: January 24, 1991
PETITIONER:
John and Diane Gianaris
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1110 South Busse Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
November 27, 1990
January 8, 1991
REQUEST:
Variations from Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow a 23'-8"
wide driveway and from Section
14,1102.A to allow 41%
impervious surface in the front
yard.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Micheale Skowron
ABSENT: Richard Pratt
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016.A.3
to allow a 23'-8" wide driveway in lieu of the maximum
allowed 21' and from Section 14.1102.A to allow 41%
impervious surface in the front yard in lieu of the required
maximum of 35%.
The petitioners, John and Diane Gianaris of 1110 S. Busse Rd.
presented their case stating that they received a permit for
a 21' driveway and the contractor replaced the sidewalk along
the side of the driveway making the driveway 23'-8" wide.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitioner did receive a permit for a 21'
driveway and as the petitioner stated the contractor poured
a sidewalk along the side of the driveway which must be
included in the overall driveway width. Due to the wider
driveeway and the narrower lot width the front yard
impervious coverage exceeds the maximum 35% allowed.
Miss Farnham stated that there is a gravel strip near the
driveway for drainage and staff had no objections.
The Board then discussed the petitioners request and stated
tions.
Basnik
ers req
idy mov
L CALL;
arried
ethers t
-d the z
Lers req
in the
,L CALL:
then enterta
I
eat.
dE
,R Mrs. Brot
4ES: Lannon
Skowro
SYS: None
I ,
Y! a vote of
ep)p moved to
n�ling Board o
U,
t for a 23
rllint yard. M
RTS: Lannon
NXYS: None
,arried b la vote of 6
R
I
t motion
secondee
,,hers,
;nik
^e Reso.
gals ap,
Iriveva
)wron s
thers
anik.
elle Th
ding Se
ZBA-91-V-90
January 24, 1991
Page 2 of 2
grant the
idy, Brettrager,
n number Z-91-90
1 of the
41% impervious
ed.
dy, Brettrager,
ry
Phone: 708 / 392-6000
Fax: 70B / 392-6022
NOTICE
January 31, 1991
THE FEBRUARY 4, 1991 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD
HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT BUSINESS. THE
NEXT MEETING WILL TAKE PLACE ON MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1991.
AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W BUSSE
Wyyyr
TIMOTHY J CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J WATTENSERG
Village of
Mount Prospect
VILLAGEMANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A FIELDS
Phone: 708 / 392-6000
Fax: 70B / 392-6022
NOTICE
January 31, 1991
THE FEBRUARY 4, 1991 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD
HAS BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT BUSINESS. THE
NEXT MEETING WILL TAKE PLACE ON MONDAY, MARCH 4, 1991.
AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.