The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4186_001Next Ordinance No. 4268 Next Resolution No. 4-91 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Meeting ROOM, 1st Floor Tuesday Senior Citizen Center January 15, 1991 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. X. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL January 15, 1991 Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Donald Weibel III. INVOCATION - Trustee Weibel IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, January 2, 1991 APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, January 8, 1991 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD A. Presented from the Illinois Crime Prevention Association to Sgt. Dick Draffone - 1991 Illinois Crime Prevention Officer of the Year VII. MAYORIS REPORT VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 82 -SU -90, Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE MOUNT PROSPECT COMMONS SHOPPING CENTER This Ordinance grants a Special Use to permit the operation of a billiard/cafe parlour within the shopping center located on the northwest corner of Golf and Busse Roads. C. ZBA 93 -SU -90, 2218 S. Busse Road 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4180 TO PERMIT THE OPERATION OF A CAR WASH WITHIN AN EXISTING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT This Ordinance amends the Planned Unit Development governing the subject property to permit the operation of a car wash. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this Special Use by a vote of 5-1. (Exhibit A) (Exhibit B) D. ZBA 94 -SU -90 and ZBA 95-V-90, 812 Deborah Lane 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 812 DEBORAH LANE This ordinance grants a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage and a variation to permit a driveway 34 feet wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends granting these requests by (Exhibit C) a vote of 6-0. E. Accept public improvement installed in conjunction with the Frediani Court Subdivision. F. Accept improvements installed in conjunction with the Plaza United Shopping Center, Busse and Algonquin Roads. G. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE BALLOT FOR THE APRIL 2, 1991 ELECTION This Ordinance establishes a referendum question as to whether the -voters will support the construction of a new Fire/Police Building. (Exhibit D) H. ZBA 96-A-90, Text Amendments lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This ordinance amends various sections of Chapter 14 in order to accomplish the following: 1. To change the meeting time of the Zoning Board of Appeals from 8:00 PM to 7:30 PM; 2. To revise the requirements for lot consolidation. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the requested text amendments by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit E) I. Accept the improvements installed in conjunction with the traffic signals at Schoenbeck and Rand Roads. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIV ENTITLED FIRE LANES OF CHAPTER 18 OF THE VILLAGE CODE This ordinance updates the list of designated Fire Lanes in the Village Code, in accordance with the recommendation of the Fire Prevention (Exhibit F) Bureau. B. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A JOINT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RELATIVE TO THE SIGNALIZATION OF ALGONQUIN ROAD (Exhibit G) AND BRIARWOOD DRIVE X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT A. Accept proposal for pavement investigation program. B. Accept State bid for the purchase of Police squad cars. C. Status Report X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JANUARY 2, 1990 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Leo Floros Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Donald Weibel INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Arthur. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved APPROVE to approve the minutes of the Special meeting of MINUTES the Mayor and Board of Trustees held December 11, 1990. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Pass: Floros Motion carried. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to approve the minutes of the Regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held December 18, 1990. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 464,459 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 6,582 Community Development Block Grant Fund 23,160 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 9,863 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 49,699 Parking System Revenue Fund 1,411 Risk Management Fund 63,515 Motor Equipment Pool Fund 1,219 P.W. Facility Construction Fund A - P.W. Facility Construction Fund B - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 3,863 Special Service Area Const. #5 - Special Service Area Const. #6 - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) - Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - Debt Service Funds 400 Flexcomp Trust Fund 6,000 Escrow Deposit Fund 13,588 Police Pension Fund 39,549 Firemen's Pension Fund 41,634 Benefit Trust Fund $ 724,942 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. F.1 S! 9 1. notj Trustee Van Geem 'questioned a bill authorized for payment from a previous list of bills. The item was $6,315 paid to the Northwest Municipal Conference � It was noted that this, item was a one time special project in which the Conferenceis reviewing various Commonwealth Edison franchise agreements. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. MAYORIS REPORT Mayor Farley and Village Manager Dixon read the names of the many people who contributed to the Village's Christmas STAR and Meal Basket programs. The Mayor expressed his appreciation for their generosity. OLD BUSINESS' ZBA 82 -SU -90 ZBA 82-5U-90, Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center MOUNT PROSPECT At the request of the Petitioner, final action of COMMONS SHOPPING the Village on the request to grant a Special Use to BILLIARD/CAFE permit a billiard parlour/cafe in this shopping center at the northwest corner of Golf and Busse Roads Was deferred to the January 15th meeting of the Village Board. AMEND CH. 11 An Ordinance was presented for second reading that TAXI CAB FARES would amend Article XI of Chapter ll, which provides for an increase in the taxi -cab rate. ORD.NO. 4266 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, made a motion to adopt Ordinance No. 4266 subject to mandatory review by the Village Board of the service being provided by March 31;'1991 and if said service, in the sole discretion' Of the Board, has not substantially improved,' the rate increase may be rescinded. No further Hearing shall be required to bring about the recession of the increases. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll, call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. REFERENDUM An Ordinance was presented for second reading that QUESTION: would "place an advisory referendum question on the FIRE/POLICE April, 1.991 election ballot which asks if the residents BUILDING would support the construction of a new Fire and Police Building,' It was noted that the Village Board will be interviewing prospective developers for the downtown redevelopment area on January 5th and following that 'meeting the Board' should have a better idea of the desired location for a new Fire/police building. Discussion of this subject was deferred to a Special meeting of the Village 'Board called for Tuesday, January 8th. BUDGET AMENDMENT An Ordinance was presented for second reading that would amend the 1990/91 budget. Page 2 - January 2 1991 NEW BUSINESS ZBA 93 -SU -90, 2218 South Busse Road The Petitioner is requesting an amendment to Ordinance No. 4108 to permit a car wash within the subject Planned Unit Development, commonly referred to as the Rosenow Property. It was noted that the proposal is for a 24 hour self-service car wash. The drive-thru facility would be constructed of face brick and would include a landscape plan exceeding the requirements of the Village. The lot coverage would be approximately 15%, rather than the permitted 75%. It was stated that there would be a stacking area for approximately 35 vehicles. Attorney Sanford Stein, representing a car wash operation located on South Elmhurst Road, expressed his opinion that the legal notice was improper since it did not contain the request for front yard setbacks. He also stated that the Petitioner did not prove a need for the request and asked that the matter be remanded back to the Zoning Board of Appeals for additional expert testimony relative to need for such a use as well as traffic patterns A representative of J & L Industries, also located within the subject Planned Unit Development, stated that he had concern relative to the safety of his customers and employees if this car wash was permitted, since they would share the main access road. He also expressed concern relative to the water pressure necessary to provide adequate fire safety. Several other people spoke in opposition to this proposal. Mayor Farley noted the legal notice for this case contained the appropriate information and saw no reason to remand this case back to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Mr. Farley stated that if the Board concurred with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals to grant the request any expert testimony or additional comments could be made at the next meeting when an Ordinance would be presented for first reading. Trustee Corcoran questioned the water pressure issue and Trustee Van Geem stated that he did not necessarily favor a 24-hour operation. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the requested amendment to Ordinance No. 4108 to permit a car wash. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Van Geem, Farley Nays: Weibel Pass: Busse Motion carried. Trustee Busse explained that he passed on this motion to avoid what may be conceived as a conflict of interest. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the January 15th meeting of the Village Board. Page 3 - January 2, 1991 ZBA 93 -SU -90 2218 S.BUSSE ROAD ZBA 94 -SU -90 & ZBA 94 -SIJ -90 & ZBA 95-V-90, 812 Deborah Lane ZBA 95-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting,a Special Use to permit 812 DEBORAH LANE a 3' -car garage and a variation to permit a driveway 34 feet wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Corcoran, :seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning, Board of Appeals and grant the Special Use and variation being the subjects of ZBA 94 -SCJ -90 and ZBA 95_V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, ,Busse, Corcoran, Floros, °Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the January 15th meeting of the Village Board. ZBA 96-A-90 ZBA 96-A-90, Text Amendments TEXT AMENDMENTS The case proposes the following amendments to Chapter AMEND CH.14 14 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village Code: 1. To change the meeting time of the Zoning Board of appeals from 8:00 PM to 7:30 PM; 2. To permit home occupations in all residential Zoning districts, with certain performance standards; and 3. To revise the requirements for lot consolidation. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends granting these text amendments by a vote of 5-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals-: to change the meeting time for the Zoni=ng Board of Appeals meetings from 8 PM to 7.30 PM. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. Inasmuch as there are several issues involved with the subject of permitting home occupations, Mayor Farley asked that this subject be placed on a Conmittee of the Whole agenda for January 22nd. . Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to refer discussion on the subject of home occupations to the Committee of the Whole meeting on January 22nd. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Page 4 - January 2, 1991 Appeals to revise the requirements for lot consolidation. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. An ordinance will be presented January 15th reflecting these two text amendments. A Resolution was presented that would grant STATE authorization to the Village to perform certain ROADWAY maintenance on State rights-of-way without having MAINTENANCE first obtained a permit or posted a bond. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved RES.NO.1-91 for passage of Resolution No. 1-91 A RESOLUTION PROVIDED FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO PERFORM CERTAIN MAINTENANCE WITHIN STATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented to amend Resolution RES.NO. 17-86 No. 17-86 providing for certain people to be exempt from paying for a Village vehicle sticker. This amendment includes the Sign Review Board and Recycling Commission. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution No. 2-91 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 17-86 RELATIVE TO PERSONS WHO SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM PAYING FOR A MOUNT PROSPECT MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize FOREST RIVER execution of the annual Agreement between the FIRE PROTECITON Village and the Forest River Fire Protection DISTRICT District to provide emergency services of the AGREEMENT Fire Department for the year 1991. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved RES.NO. 3-91 for passage of Resolution No. 3-91 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. Page 5 - January 2, 1991 VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT INSURANCE: Village Manager John Dimon presented a proposal for PROPERTY & property and liability insurance recommended by LIABILITY corporate Policyholder's Counsel (CPC), the Village's insurance consultant. The recommendation is to carry the coverage .at the premium cost as follows: Public Officials $37,800 Law Enforcement 38,852 Workers' Comp 44,022 Paramedic Liability 5,567 Property Insurance 25.259 $150,500 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Village Manager and authorize the insurance coverage as listed. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel Nays: None Motion carried. INSURANCE: Mr. Dixon presented a request to renew the existing MEDICAL contract with Brookfield, Inc. as claims administrators of the Village's medical insurance. It was recommended that the Village enter into a 3 year agreement with Brookfield, Inc. at a annual cost of $44,907 ($11.88 per employee per month) with an increase not to exceed 6% for 1992 and 1993. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by; Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Village Manager and authorize a 3;year contract with Brookfield, Inc. as the Village's medical insurance administrators at a cost of $11.88 per employee per month with a limit of '6% increase for the years 1992 and 1993. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel' Nays: None Motion carried. STATUS REPORT: Mr. Dixon, announced that the Court had issued a ruling DISCONNECT SUIT in favor of those properties on the south side of the Village around the Busse Roan area who filed action to disconnect from the Village. He also announced that the Appellate Court had issued a Stay until January 16, 1991. ELK GROVE RURAL Mr. Dixon stated that the Elk Grove Rural Fire FIREPROTECTION Protection District has filed the necessary documents DISTRICT to remove their tax from the bills of approximately 2.6 single family homes, which have been taxed by bath the Village and Elk Grove Rural Fire Protection District for emergency services. DOWNTOWN A meeting has been scheduled for Saturday, January 5th DEVELOPMENT to interview prospective develoPers of the downtown area. Following that meeting it is anticipated that the Village Board would be able to determine the appropriate location for a new fire and police building. ANY OTHER BUSINESS STATE INCOME At the request of Trustee Van Geem, the Board discussed TAX SURCHARGE the subject of the whether the Village should encourage the Governor to retain the 'State Income Tax Surcharge. Page 6 - January 2, 1991 Trustee Van Geem noted that while the Village benefits from this surcharge, other governmental bodies do not receive the proportional benefits. Mayor Farley stated that this subject will be discussed at the Northwest Municipal Conference meeting and he will support the continuation of the surcharge at that meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the ADJOURN Board, Mayor Farley declared the meeting adjourned. The meeting was adjourned at 10:04 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 7 - January 2, 1991 MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JANUARY 8, 1991 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Absent: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Leo Floras Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Donald Weibel Trustee Tim Corcoran INVOCATION The invocation was given by Mayor Farley. CALL TO ORDER INVOCATION OLD BUSINESS Mayor Farley stated that this Special Meeting of the FIRE/POLICE Village Board had been called for the purpose of BUILDING discussing the proposed advisory referendum question to be placed on the April 2, 1991 ballot relative to whether the voters would support the construction of a new Fire and Police Building. There has been discussion as to the location of the new building, at the existing location at 112 East Northwest Highway or on Pine Street where the former Public Works Facility was located. Due to the fact that the Village Board designated Broadacre as the 'preferred developer' for the downtown redevelopment last Saturday, Mayor Farley asked that discussion on this subject be deferred until the next regular meeting of the Village Board on January 15 in order to give Broadacre the opportunity to review the options for redevelopment and whether the new Fire and Police Building should be considered in the overall redevelopment plan for that area or built at the existing location. It was the consensus of the Board that this item should deferred to the January 15th meeting. ADJOURNMENT Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 7:38. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 1 of 1 - January 8, 1991 VIA Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: RONALD W. PAVLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE SUBJECT: JANUARY 15, 1991 BOARD MEETING - OFFICER AWARD DATE: JANUARY 4, 1991 I just received word that Sergeant Richard Draffone will be the recipient of the 1991 Illinois Crime Prevention Officers Association/ Security Link Award. Mr. Robert Scanlon, Regional Training Director for Security Link and liaison to the Illinois Crime Prevention Association (ICPA), advised me that the committee, made up of representatives from throughout the state of Illinois and comprised of police officers, private security officers and private business owners, had decided that due to Sergeant Draffone's past years of involvement with the ICPA he should be named for this award. This award is based upon Sgt. Draf f one I s past assignment as a Crime Prevention Officer for the Village of Mount Prospect, his presidency for two years (1987-1988) of the Regional Crime Prevention Association, and his presidency of the Illinois Crime Prevention Association in 1989. During that time he provided the associations with leadership and innovation, and created a professional group of law enforcement and private security representatives in the state of Illinois. Sgt. Draffone will also receive a scholarship of $500 as part of the award to use toward his Master's Degree. Although we currently have two professional Crime Prevention Officers and have had other individuals that served in the Crime Prevention capacity, this award for Sergeant Draffone, even though he is no longer functioning as a Crime Prevention Officer, is certainly a signal honor for him, the Mount Prospect Police Department, and the Village of Mount Prospect. Mr. Scanlon and Galen Westerfield of the Attorney General's Office and current president' of the ICPA, have requested to appear at the January 15, 1991 Village Board meeting to present the award to Sergeant Draffone in front of the Mayor and Village Board. I am asking that this item be placed under the appropriate place on the agenda, perhaps under the Mayor's Report, so that we can recognize this Sergeant for his past efforts. RWP: i d VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: n L JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WV - --'AND FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 14, 1990 SUBJECT: ZBA-82-SU-90, BILLIARD PARLOUR CAFE LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF GOLF AND BUSSE ROADS (MOUNT PROSPECT COMMONS) The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request on a request for a Special Use permit to operate a billiard parlour cafe (game room) in Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center. A billiard parlour falls under the definition of a game room which is a Special Use in B-3 Zoning Districts per Section 14.2001.C.2. This request was initially reviewed by the Zoning Board at their October 25, 1990 meeting. Due to a technical error in legal notification to surrounding property owners, this request was referred back to the Zoning Board for another public hearing. At the meeting, the petitioner, Jay Eigel, presented testimony in support of the request. He described the proposed billiard parlour cafe as a recreational amenity, stating that the quality and character would be upscale; similar to the Billiard Emporium in Schaumburg and Pockets in Aurora. He attempted to address the concerns raised by neighborhood residents including: 1. Security: He stated that a sophisticated security system including several access control points would be in place. He also indicated that persons under age 21 would not be allowed in the billiards area unless accompanied by a parent or legal guardian. 2. impact on Clearwater Park: He stated that he had met with the Park District staff who did not indicate any major concerns with the location of the billiard parlour next to the Park. 3. Maintaining appropriate security and character: He stated that he would be willing to commit to special conditions restricting changes to the proposed floor plan and exterior display signage to ensure that the proposed level of security and upscale character are maintained. John Fulton Dixon Page 2 December 14, 1990 David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, briefly reviewed the request and the reason for the second hearing before the Zoning Board. He also identified the prominent concerns expressed by residents who had contacted the Planning and Zoning office. These include: 1. Security - particularly for users of Clearwater Park. He noted that he received a -- letter from the Park Board which was subsequently distributed to the Zoning Boa.d of Appeals. He also stated that the Police Department reviewed this case and did not have any major concerns relative to security. 2. Change of ownership - will the level of security and upscale atmosphere proposed be negatively affected if the establishment comes under new ownership? Mr. Clements noted that because this is a special use, specific conditions can be attached to the permit to control changes to the specific use in the future. In this regard he recommended tha- the following conditions be attached to approval of the Special Use permit: a. Security/control points must be maintained in similar quantity and logical locations as proposed on the floor plan. b. An area specifically designated for food service must be maintained in a similar size as proposed on the floor plan. C. Signs displaying beer or alcohol shall not be allowed which are visible to the outside. Approximately 25 residents were present in the audience to express opposition to the request. Fourteen residents presented testimony opposing the billiard parlour cafe. It was also noted that a petition with 424 signatures opposing the request had been formally submitted to the Village Board and Zoning Board of Appeals. The majority of the residents stated similar concerns about safety and security. Much of their concern focused on the serving of liquor in this location. Many stated that this is not an appropriate location for a billiard parlour. Since it is so close to the park, residents and schools. Several stated that the use would negatively impact local traffic congestion and increase vandalism. Some stated that this use is not consistent with the original intent to develop this Mall with upscale retail uses. In addition, a billiard parlour would project a negative image for the Village. In considering the request, Zoning Board of Appeals Chairman Basnik noted that the Zoning Board was reviewing the use and not the liquor license. Mr. Cassidy expressed concern with the use in this location. He does not believe that all of the Special Use standards can be adequately met. John Fulton Dixon December 14, 1990 Page 3 Mr. Lannon, stating several factors, felt that no evidence exists to positively conclude that this use would be injurious to surrounding property owners and uses. He noted that other uses permitted under B-3 zoning, including taverns, could potentially be more offensive than the proposed use. After some deliberation, the Zoning Board, by a 4-1 vote, (Cassidy voted nay), recommends that a Special Use permit be granted to allow a billiard parlour cafe (game room) in Mount - Prospect Commons, subject to the following conditions: 1. No signs advertising alcoholic beverages shall be permitted which are visible to the outside. 2. The floor plan submitted will serve as a governing document and cannot be changed unless formally amended via the public hearing process. [10315CIA EXHIBIT 1 Afl 32 u 27 s u =30 r u u 33 FrF267--1 t 39 21 22 MVA-M�. MOVAMS0000 CAFE 37 I� i 0 0 1,71 Ll W 00 [111 [121 U H14 COWPOOL OFFKI MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 82 -SU -90 Hearing Date: 10/25/90 and 12/13/90 PETITIONER: Billiard Parlour Cafe SUBJECT PROPERTY: Mt. Prospect Commons Shopping Center NW Comer of Busse and Golf Roads PUBLICATION DATE: October 9, 1990 and November 27, 1990 REQUEST: The petitioner is requesting a Special Use Permit to operate a billiard parlour (game room) in the B-3 Retail and Service Zoning District. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers Michaele Skowron OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Approximately 25 Residents Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that this was a Special Use permit to operate a game room at the Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center. Mr. Basnik stated this case had been referred back to the Zoning Board by the Village Board for a new hearing due to questions about the initial notice provided to residents and the Park District. Mr. Jay Eigel introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated he would be one of the principal operators of the Billiard Cafe. He stated that he and his partner, William Tebussek hope to occupy 14,000 sq. ft. space in the shopping center for the purpose of installing 39 billiard tables and cafe seating and a lounge area for approximately 80 persons. Mr. Eigel described the hours of operation for the billiard parlour as from 11:00 a.m. to 1:00 Monday through Friday, with longer hours on a weekend. He stated that the cafe restaurant would be open for lunch and for dinner. He stated that access to the billiard area within the facility would be controlled by personnel, and available only through an electronically operated tum -styles or control points, and that only persons 21 years of age or older would be permitted. He stated a dress code would be required and the beverages would be priced at a higher level to encourage an upscale market, and to get away from the image of a old, dark pool hall type establishment. ZBA-82-SU-90 Page 2 He indicated that he or Mr. Tebussek would be on,prernise at all times and mentioned that billiards is a growing industry for recreation, and that there are a number of similar establishments in the Chicago Metropolitan Area. Mr. Eigel explained that he had met with the discussed the use with them, and that they had safety. He also stated he had talked with the concerning the use and its proximity to Clear indicated that they did not have any objections I [aunt Prospect Police Department and Aicated no objections or concerns over ff of the Mount Prospect Park District tter Park, and that the staff generally the use. Mr. Eigel explained that, with the hours of the billiard cafe being peak times in the evening, there would be no conflict with the users of Clearwater Park. He also noted that he would apply for a liquor license and that would go through all the necessary applications and hearings to obtain that license. In conclusion, Mr. Eigel stated he had attempted to highlight the main points from his prior presentation of October 25, and again emphasize to the Zoning Board and to persons in the audience that this would be a type of establishment that would be safe and secure and not be a perception of a pool hall that people, may mistakenly have. He stated that he would be making a substantial investment in equipment and remodelling of the building, and that he believes it is in his best interest to provide a facility that is an asset to the community. Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zor summary of the staff report. Mr. Clements Indic planning concerns, more so than the operatiom petitioner. Mr. Clements stated that the Billiard the shopping center that has an excessive amount frontage. He explained that this type of space Ier the billiard establishment, this meaning, that the traffic than impulse traffic that might be better j Mr. Clements also noted that the peak hours of 4 the later afternoon or evenings, and that tb establishment would not conflict with parking shopping center. Mr. Clements noted that, Irl customers of the Billiard Cafe would not general center, and that this type of use might not be, thit environment in this shopping center. Mr. Pe. ig for the Village, then presented his ,ed that he would discuss locational and issues that had been addressed by the We is located in a large leased space in )f area, yet very little storefront or retail itself to a destination -type user, such as, ousiness relies more on repeat customer nerated by a retail store. would be in Mr. Clements stated that in reviewing an application, all Village Departments provide input and their opinions, and that in this request, the, opinion of the Police Department was particularly important. Mr. Clements stressed that the Police Department had visited other billiard establishments and talked with Police Departments in other suburban municipalities. These other Police Departments had indicated no objections or no problems with existing establishments, and based on this information, and our own Police Departmenfs review of ZBA-82-SU-90 Page 3 this application, the Mount Prospect Police Department indicated no objection or concern to the application for safety or security. Mr. Clements also stated that the applicant would have to make the necessary application for a liquor license and go through the appropriate hearings. He then stated that it was important to emphasize for the members of the audience that there could be permitted uses in the shopping centers that would allow a liquor license and that would not necessarily be subject to a public hearing before the Zoning Board. Mr. Clements stated that there had been discussions about a banquet hall in this particular unit in the shopping center, and that this type of use would most certainly require a liquor license. Mr. Clements stated that there was a question raised by objectors concerning the quality of the business, and what might happen in the future if this operator were to sell the establishment, and that there would be the possibility that the facility might become more of a traditional pool hall than the upscale establishment as proposed. Mr. Clements recommended that the Zoning Board attach certain conditions to the Special Use approval; one condition being the floor plan. He stated that this floor plan depicts security and control points for users of the pool tables, and that it also shows the cafe or restaurant seating. Mr. Clements stated that with these two features made part of the Ordinance, this would help assure that the operation remains as presented, and that any future user provide the same type of restaurant arrangement and control points for users of the pool tables. Mr. Clements also recommended that there be no display of beer or alcohol signs visible from the parking lot, so as not to appear to promote the bar use in the facility. Chairman then asked for comments from the audience. The following Mount Prospect residents spoke in opposition to the request: Jeanette Blunda Lois Tolf 804 South Kennicott 810 West Lonnquist Andrea Melnyk Mr. & Mrs. Lowery 802 Kennicott 1531 West Lonnquist Michael Petro Bob Fahlbusch 905 Kennicott 811 Kennicott Debbie Schermer Francis Ryan 240 Hatlen 410 South Busse Denise Comstock Glen Sedey 1303 Robert 1701 Estates Drive ZBt-82-SU-90 Page 4 These residents objected to the proposed Special Use for the following reasons; 1. The image that a pool hall would project for Mount Prospect. 2. objections concerning the proximity of the billiard emporium to Clearwater .Park, and a belief that users of the billiard emporium:might visit Clearwater Park causing a disturbance on this public property. 3. That the proposed Special Use is too close to existing residences. 4. That the area is predominantly residential. 5. That the developer should lease the retail space to permitted uses rather than special uses. 6. A concern for the safety of their children in the park based on the location of the billiardemporium 7. There were several public schools close' by. 8. That alcohol, in conjunction with the pool tables, could be a dangerous situation contributing to an increase of drunken driving in the neighborhood. 9. A letter from the,Board of Park Commissioners for the Mount Prospect Park District indicating a concern for the establishment adjoining Clearwater Park. 10. That the proposed billiard emporium would adversely affect property values in the area. Lastly, Kenneth Blunda and Andrea Melnyk both made reference to a petition with the names of 400 residents who objected to the proposed Special Use, a copy of which was submitted to the Zoning Board and the public hearing file. Chairman Basnik then closed public discussion; on the request and the Zoning Board then generally discussed the proposed Special. Use. Mr. Brettrager indicated that he did not believe that there was an impact on the .Park from the proposed Special Use, and, stated that there are no roar entrances from the bid emporium and that it is highly unlikely that any users of the facility would utilize the Park after hours and create a disturbance. Mr. Lannon also noted that the hours of operation for the establishment would be at a time when most children are not in Clearwater Park without supervision. !A � .. ... �.�. .lea f ♦ 1: �..�. •- •' ".. tl. B.t ! 'F Y il �. �..: r 1. 1 i � 1 ZBA-82-SU-90 Page 5 area is not residential, that Golf Road is predominantly commercial, and that the nearest single family homes are approximately 700 feet away. Mr. Cassidy stated that he believed the Special Use standard for an impact being injurious to surrounding properties and diminishing values of those properties should be examined, and that he believed that there may be some detrimental effect to the use. Chairman Basnik questioned what that impact might be and stated it would be impossible to measure, and that it is arbitrary to state that this use in the shopping center would have any more - adverse impact than the actual shopping center itself. Mr. Brettrager stated there was no evidence of any adverse impact on adjoining Clearwater Park. Mr. Lannon noted that billiards and alcohol currently exist in the Village at Thunderbird Lanes. He also noted that the proposed use would not increase traffic in the shopping center and that there would be no conflicting traffic movements due to the differing hours of operations of uses in this center. He also noted that the proposed special use is clearly isolated from any nearby single family homes, and that a fence separates the shopping center property from the Park, and he believes it is highly unlikely that any customers of the billiard emporium would find their way to the Park after hours and create a public disturbance, or more importantly be a threat to the life safety of any nearby residents or their children. He also explained that the B-3 zoning classification would allow a tavern or a restaurant where liquor would be permitted, and that certain uses would not require a public hearing approval by the Zoning Board. Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a Special Use permit for a game room authorizing a billiard cafe, subject to the following conditions: 1. That the floor plan showing the security and control areas and the cafe restaurant seating be attached as a governing document for the use. 2. That there be no display of alcohol or beer signs visible from the parking lot. The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Basnik NAYS: Cassidy MT. Cassidy voted in opposition to the request based on a concern about the impact of the proposed Special Use on adjoining Clearwater Park. Respectfully Submitted, DAVID M. CLEMENTS r. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSrECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN %9 - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 4, 1990 SUBJECT: ZBA-82-SU-90, BILLIARD PARLOUR CAFE MOUNT PROSPECT COMMONS SHOPPING CENTER The Zoning Board of Appeals initially reviewed this request at their meeting of October 25, and recommended approval by a 6-1 vote. On November 6, the Village Board reviewed the recommendation of the Zoning Board, and concurred by authorizing the preparation of a final ordinance. At these meetings, several residents from nearby Kennicott Place objected to the request, primarily based on a belief that the proposed use was not compatible with the adjoining Clearwater Park. These residents also pointed out that the public notice sign was placed at the storefront, and not prominently displayed near the street. Because of this, these residents believe that other nearby property owners were unaware of the hearing. Also, it was noted that the required list of adjoining property owners showed the Park District, owners of Clearwater Park, as "exempt." Accordingly, the Park District did not receive written notice of the initial public hearing. Based on concern about the sip location, and the fact that the Park District did not receive written notice, the Village Board referred the Special Use request back to the Zoning Board for a new hearing. At the December 13 hearing, I believe the Zoning Board can expect a large number of residents objecting to the request, expressing the same concern that was stated by objectors at the October 25 meeting. It is my opinion that, if the Zoning Board is to reverse its decision from October 25, it must be on the basis of new evidence. Residents have discussed the distance from the billiard cafe to adjoining homes and schools. For the information of the Zoning Board, the homes along Kennicott Place are 700 feet from the proposed use, and Holmes Jr. High is 1,600 feet Also, staff would like to note that peak hours for the Billiard Cafe will be in the evenings and as such, should not conflict with daily use houzs of Clearwater Park, particularly by children. The original staff report is attached. Staff recommends approval based on the findings of the report. cc: John Fulton Dixon CAF/11/14/90 vwl/12/14/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS THE MOUNT PROSPECT COMMONS SHOPPINGCENTER WHEREAS, The Billiard Parlour Cafe (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property commonly known the Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center, generally located at the northwest corner of Golf and Busse Roads (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Di Mucci's Resubdivision of Lot 2, except that part hereof taken for the widening of Busse Road, in the division of Louis F. Busse Farm, being division of the Northeast 1/4 (except the West 686.40 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of said Northeast 1/4) of Section 15 in Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a special Use to permit the operation of a game room in the form of a billiard parlour in a B-3 Shopping Center District; and WHEREAS, a.public hearing was held on the request for Special Use (designated as ZBA Case No. 82 -SU -90) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of October, 1990, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 9th day of October, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in support of the request being the subject of ZBA 82 -SU -90; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Special Use would be in the best interest of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Special Use to the subject property to permit the operation of a game room in the nature of a billiard parlour in a B-3 zoning district, subject to the following conditions: 1. That proposed Space Plan P-1 dated 10/3/90 hereby be made a part of this ordinance. The Space Plan depicts two security and control points for users of the billiard tables, and cafe or restaurant seating. These design features, and all other features of the Space Plan, are to be essential parts of the proposed use, and shall not be changed without amendment of this ordinance. The Space Plan shall also be enforced for any future operator of the facility. 0 ZBA 82 -SU -90 Page 2 of 2 That there shall be no display of liquor advertising signs in the windows, visible from the parking lot, or at the rear of the building. SECTION THREE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990 SUBJECT: ZBA-93-SU-90, TERENCE E. FREDIANI LOCATION: 2218 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD (ROSENOW INDUSTRIAL PARK) The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on a request for an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 filed by Terence Frediani. The application was filed to allow a car wash in Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit Development and to allow a front yard setback of 10 feet rather than the 30 foot front yard established for the P.U.D. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Fiediani presented testimony in support of the request. He described the proposed facility stating that this was intended to be the "flag ship" for the franchise. As such, great attention would be given to the exterior design and landscaping. Rich Spedoni, Spot -Not franchise manager, explained that the typical franchise hours of operation are from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily, but they would prefer to be open 24 hours at this location. The facility would be manned from 7:00 a.m, to 10:00 p.m. He further discussed the typical customer volume, peak hours, and price structure of services offered. Tom Coutre, owner/operator of National Pride Car Wash, 2000 South Elmhurst Road, expressed concern about the need for another car wash in the area. He felt that another car wash in the area would adversely affect his and other auto -oriented businesses in the area. Tom Kropika, owner/operator of Tom's Auto Body, 2000 South Elmhrust Road expressed similar concerns. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that staff has some concerns with the proposal relative to traffic impacts and site constraints. However, staffs primary concern is that a car wash is not consistent with the original intent to develop the P.U.D. with small lot industrial uses. While staff prefers an industrial use on this lot, the proposed car wash is generally compatible with the mixed use character of South Busse Road. The Zoning Board discussed the request deliberating over the issue of the market feasibility. The majority of members felt that the Zoning Code is not intended to shelter or protect individual businesses. In addition, the proposed use is less obnoxious and intense than other uses permitted in the I-1 Zoning District. It is also compatible with existing surrounding development. Accordingly, by a 5-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approve the request to amend Special Use Ordinance #4180 to allow a car wash and 10 foot front yard setback on Lot #5 in the Rosenow Industrial P.U.D. i � .i' ,1:� Yw kir«u/e �'"""9—"•.,>.� �'*' ,ar[e xf[lrrow rV _ tpe KASJL 7 ,_i t 4 Y r �5 1#�i t.. ,•i> t•S.x �.n .{+.. rte+..<m.a _ _ < . ?x tt [i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 93 -SU -90 Hearing Date: December 13, 1990 PETITIONER: Terence E. Frediani SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2218 S. Busse Road PUBLICATION DATE: November 27, 1990 REQUEST: An amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 to allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit Development. The proposed development will also require an amendment to the setback requirements established for the P.U.D. to allow a 10' front yard rather than the 301 front yard required. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Thomas Coutre, 2000 S. Elmhurst Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 to allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit Development. The proposed development will also require an amendment to the setback requirements established for the P.U.D. to allow a 10' front yard rather than the 301 front yard required. The petitioner, Terence Frediani, 1705 Frediani Ct., presented his case stating that he would like to open a car wash at 2218 S. Busse Rd. Mr. Frediani continued by stating he has been in the Village of Mount Prospect for 37 years and would like to keep his business here. Mr. Frediani stated that the Special Use would be for a small driveway located on the east side of the proposed property. Mr. Frediani also stated that the site would be very open with visually pleasing and extensive landscaping. Mr. Frediani then noted that the building height would be well under the requirement for the Village. Mr. Frediani stated that the proposed car wash would ZBA-93-SU-90 December 13, 1990 Page 2 of 3 be a positive and useful service and would be upgrading for the surrounding area. Mr. Rich Spidoni, of Spot -Not Franchise, stated that there are 22 existing Spot -Not -Car Washes in the area, the closest in Tinley Park. Mr. ,Spidoni also stated that the nearest car wash is about a 1 mile from the proposed car wash. Mr. Spidoni stated that the peak hours would be on the weekends and;; afterwork between 5 o'clock and 7 o'clock. Mr. Lannon questioned the hours of the car wash. Mr. 'Spidoni stated that the hours would be from 7;00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. but they would like this to be a 24 hour car wash. Mr. Spidoni also stated that the proposed building would not be facing Busse Rd. and would have stacking space for 35 cars. Chairman Basnik questioned how many cars a day they expect. Mr. Spidoni estimates 80 cars a day which would be about 500 a week. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, noted that there would be 8 serving bays and this would be a self serve type of car wash. Miss Farnham stated the staff has concerns with traffic conflict. Miss Farnham noted the car wash was not with the initial P.U.D. plan to develop small lot industrial uses. Mrs. 8kowron asked if cars would start stacking up on Busse Road. Miss Farnham stated they would probably stack on the access road before overflowing onto Busse Road. Mr. Cassidy asked if any other developments are on the property? Miss Farnham stated that J&L Warehouse is the only other building there `now, 'but at least one other proposal is currently in the planning; stages. Thomas Coutre, National Pride Car Wash, 2200 S. Elmhurst Rd., stated concerns for the proposed car wash. Mr. Coutre stated that he has owned the National Pride car wash since 1986 and feel the Village of Mount Prospect does not need another car wash. Mr. Coutre feels he will experience personal economic loss noting that there are 11 car washes on Elmhurst Road and within a 1 mile radius of his car wash. Mr. Coutre presented a chart showing the expected dollar losses he might incur if another car wash went in. Mr. Coutre stated he is totally against the proposed car wash. Tom Cropika, Tom's Auto Body, Mt. Prospect, stated that he gets a lot of business from the National Pride Car Wash owned by Mr. Coutre, and any change in business for the car wash would directly impact him. Mr. Frediani stated that National Car Wash is 1.6 miles from his proposed car wash. He is going into the business for ZBA-93-SU-90 December 13, 1990 Page 3 of 3 profit and feels the competition factor irrelevant to his case. Mr. Spidoni noted that the Spot -Not Franchise relies on advertisement and market evalutation. The Board then generally discussed the case. The Board discussed Mr. Coutre's concerns about market saturation and competition. Mr. Lannon stated that the Zoning Ordinance should not be used to shelter or protect businesses from free market competition. Chairman Basnik disagreed, stating that zoning has a direct impact on the market. He felt that in this situation, since the property is zoned I-1 and the P.U.D. was originally intended for I-1 uses, a commercial use would not be appropriate. Mr. Lannon stated that the primary issue relates to the appropriateness of the use in this location, not its market feasibility. Mr. Brettrager stated that this use is not offensive to the area and feels it would be beneficial for the people who live in apartments just to the north of the proposed area. Mr. Cassidy agreed with Mr. Brettrager. Chairman Basnik questioned if the Village needs another Car wash. Mr. Lannon stated it would not adversely affect the area. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for an amendment to Special Use # 4180 to allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit Development. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron NAYS: Basnik Motion carried by a vote of 5-1. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary Vh,..AGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN *L. - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 3,19" CASE NO.: ZBA-93-SU-90 APPLICANT. TERENCE E. FREDIANI ADDRESS: 2218 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD (ROSENOW INDUSTRIAL PARK) LOCATION MAP* ----u y R RX PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: ZONING: 1-1 (Light Industrial) LOT SIZE: 49,630 st (1.14 Acres) = 13.9% of total PUD % COVERAGE: 49.5% F.A.R. : N/A Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 The applicant is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 to allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit Development. The proposed development will also require an amendment to the setback requirements established for the P.U.D. to allow a 10 foot front yard rather than the 30 foot front yard required. wary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a car wash on Lot 5 in the senow Industrial Park. Because car washes are not a permitted use in the I-1 District, .e P.U.D. must be amended to allow this use. The Zoning Ordinance under Section A.2503.B allows the Zoning Board of Appeals to recommend authorizing uses within the Tanned Unit Developments that otherwise are not allowed under the use regulations of the corresponding zoning district, if the proposed use satisfactorily meets the Special Use standards listed in the Ordinance. The car wash will consist of eight drive-thru service bays and four vacuum islands. Stacking for 3-5 cars will be provided for each bay. In addition, four on-site parking spaces will be provided for employee and customer use. A front yard variance is requested to accommodate a drive accessing the two eastem-most bays. The drive encroaches into the 30 foot front yard setback. A 10 foot landscaped strip will remain. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The Industrial Park contains five lots, only one of which is currently developed. The car wash will be located. on Lot #5 which is the lot closest to Busse Road. J & L Warehouse occupies the lot directly north of the proposed car wash. A proposal is currently in the planning stages for another warehouse facility at the end of the cul-de-sac. The property directly to the south is zoned R -X. Given its location between the Industrial Park and the I-90 Expressway, it is unlikely that .it will be developed for residential use. The Zoning Ordinance does not permit car washes in I-1 Zoning Districts. However, the use is no more obnoxious than other uses permitted under I-1 Zoning. The proposed site plan includes a significant amount of landscaping, especially along the road accessing the entire PUD. The proposed use is more commercial in nature than other uses permitted in the I-1. District. Consequently, it might generate more short-term (customer) traffic than the other uses in the PUD. It is likely however, that peak customer volume will occur on weekends when other industrial/warehouse uses typically do not generate traffic. The applicant should discuss the anticipated traffic volume that the car wash will generate. Except for some concerns about potential traffic conflicts, staff does not feel this use is incompatible with the character of the Industrial Park. However, this industrial PUD was only recently approved, and done so based on testimony from the owner that the five -lot industrial park was being created to meet an existing market condition for small industrial Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 lots. The proposed car wash is a move away from the original design of the industrial park. This type of small industrial development is desirable because it crates an area where similar uses can locate, expanding the industrial and employment base of the Village. A service use, such as a car wash, may not be inappropriate, but its location reduces industrial opportunity. The property owner should provide testimony as to his marketing plans for the remaining lots, and the advantages of locating a car wash in the industrial park. Staff notes that on-site detention may have to be modified as a result of this plan. The engineering plans for the entire five -lot industrial subdivision indicate that the northern 66 feet of this lot are part of a shared detention area. In this area, the finished grade elevation cannot exceed 680.8 feet. The landscaped berms may have to be eliminated to accommodate required detention capacity. Another option might be to grade the paved area appropriately to expand the detention area to the south... essentially transferring the detention capacity of the bermed areas to another location. However, these issues must be resolved in the detail site design stage and do not have a direct bearing on the proposed amendments. Other staff comments relate to issues that must be addressed in the detail site design. These include: -The site grading must accommodate the required detention as previously noted. -The development of this lot (#5) and the adjacent lot (#4) will require the extension of a 12" watermain through both lots to connect to a main in Busse Road. -Some proposed hydrant locations may require relocation as determined by the Fire Prevention Bureau. Staff believes that an industrial user would be better for this lot, but does not find the car wash objectionable considering the character of South Busse Road. The applicant should demonstrate that the proposed use meets the Special Use standards, particularly the anticipated traffic volume the car wash will generate. As stated earlier, the property owner should discuss his marketing plan for the remaining industrial lots, and any advantages the car wash provides. Staff also notes that the detail site design may result in modifications to the present site plan. However, these modifications do not have a direct bearing on the requested amendment and the final site and landscaping plans must be approved by staff. DMC:hg CAF/ 1/9/91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4180 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2200 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD WHEREAS, Terence E. Frediani (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition to amend Ordinance No. 4180, being an Ordinance authorizing a special Use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development with respect to property commonly known as 2218 South Busse Road (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Lot 5 in Busse Road Subdivision, being a subdivision in the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 22, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to Ordinance No. 4180 to allow a self -serve car wash, pursuant to Section 14.2503.B, and to permit a front yard setback of ten feet (101) for an access drive, rather than the 301 required; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use (designated as ZBA Case No. 93 -SU -90) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of December, 1990, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 27th day of November, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the following Ordinance regarding the Subject Property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That SECTION THREE of Ordinance No. 4180 entitled "An Ordinance Repealing Ordinance No. 3656 and Granting a Special Use in the Nature of a Planned Unit Development for Property Commonly Known as 2200 South Busse Road" is hereby amended to permit the operation of a self-service car wash as a permitted use exception in the Planned Unit Development, and to amend item number 3 in SECTION FOUR to permit for a ten foot (101) front yard for a portion of the subject property to provide for an access road, as noted on the site plan attached hereto and hereby made a part of as Exhibit I'll' 1-1 ZBA 93 -SU -90 Page 2 of 2 SECTION THREE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk � .r• fix,,. _�� aan. rxm.. ata n.nN �4�rI NJ j�a \ i —It—.,c vblf= ' �� /a �F;. YTt11 it1t,TpM Mti ♦ Y1 aM1� ,� J Mtn • 1 h d ---�.--�.. -44 Oh VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Jr FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990 SUBJECT: ZBA-94-SU-90, ZBA-95-V-90, YUN WOOK YI LOCATION: 812 SOUTH DEBORAH LANE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for a Special Use permit and variance filed by Yun Wook Yi. The application was filed to allow construction of a three -car garage and a 34 foot wide driveway at 812 South Deborah Lane. The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires Special Use permits for three -car garages and allows driveway widths up to 21 feet. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Yun presented testimony in support of the request. No objectors were present in the audience. Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that three -car garages are a common feature of newer, large single family homes in the surrounding neighborhood. She also noted that this lot is substantially larger than the minimum standard, and all proposed setbacks meet or exceed Code requirements. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting the large size of lot and ample setbacks. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approve the request for a Special Use Permit and variance to allow a three -car garage and 34 foot wide driveway at 812 South Deborah Lane. DMC:hg F- 137.75' stale Of lllib,S of Illmo's cowly Of Mc" SS COLArly Of McHenry) C)ICWW by I. William M TenBuscn, W IlYtxns Registered Land 1, William M 7en8uscb. an 111mis Regisrarea tend Prop sloaress S%"eyb,, do hereby cerlity mal I nave 4"lw If* StxveyiX, 00 ntae0y Cenity, that I h— stoyetrect tho awya shown W.10mgs as of In's — -Y above de=OW PrOpeny and Tial Mis pial,S acorea represenlsvhcinafsajds yasolmrs day D,M—.s .. 9— . 1-1 and i3ec'mal pans rWeof Reggste,rea Ldrb Surveyo 0 2767 on "a f0i4xv Regslernera Lafw= # 2767 Refer to deed Of late DOKN fm " w1i" line- Gr indicates son " sal NO aim""gft owl is. Plat flet -W � -tn-d -.1 kx3licalies I" Kv ANNE" wile. A-wican Surve...? Co. 913 Hickory G-6 , Cary IL 60013 709-616-2700 IJIal of �'itrvrjj C,�F S "p, 6,• E �,,AOsE 0 Q 10111,!�E� I C) A P(111 ; p"I XCI,Mill, 00 �X, LV; DEBORAH LN. oe, e4 5 ea, --137.75' t i if E2 LOT F- 137.75' stale Of lllib,S of Illmo's cowly Of Mc" SS COLArly Of McHenry) C)ICWW by I. William M TenBuscn, W IlYtxns Registered Land 1, William M 7en8uscb. an 111mis Regisrarea tend Prop sloaress S%"eyb,, do hereby cerlity mal I nave 4"lw If* StxveyiX, 00 ntae0y Cenity, that I h— stoyetrect tho awya shown W.10mgs as of In's — -Y above de=OW PrOpeny and Tial Mis pial,S acorea represenlsvhcinafsajds yasolmrs day D,M—.s .. 9— . 1-1 and i3ec'mal pans rWeof Reggste,rea Ldrb Surveyo 0 2767 on "a f0i4xv Regslernera Lafw= # 2767 Refer to deed Of late DOKN fm " w1i" line- Gr indicates son " sal NO aim""gft owl is. Plat flet -W � -tn-d -.1 kx3licalies I" Kv ANNE" MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 94 -SU -90 Hearing Date: December 13, 1990 95-V-90 PETITIONER: Yun Wook Yi SUBJECT PROPERTY: 812 South Deborah Lane PUBLICATION DATE: November 27, 1990 REQUEST: Special Use Permit to allow a three -car garage per Section 14.1101.C.6. Also, a variation from Section 14.3016.3 to allow a 34' wide driveway. ZBA MEMBER PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petioner is requestin a Special Use permit to allow construation of a three -car garage. Concurrently a variation is requested to Section 14.3016.3 to allow a 34' wide driveway rather than the permitted 21' width. The Petioner , Yun Wook Yi, 812 S. Deborah Ln. stated he would like to construct a three -car garage and 34' driveway on the proposed home he would like to construct. Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that the petitoners request for the construction of a three -car garage meet all setbacks, building height, lot coverage and F.A.R. Miss Farnham stated that the proposed home is larger than the surrounding homes on Deborah Lane but the character matches many recently built on nearby Kennicott Ct. Miss Farnham also stated that the petitioner will reduce the driveway to 21' at the street and will be responsible for repairs on the driveway due to utility work if required in the easements. The Board generally discussed the case and had no objections. ZBA-94-SU-90 ZBA-95-V-90 December 13, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a Special Use permit to allow construction of a three -car garage,. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote- of 6-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a"motion to grant the petitioners request for a variation from Section 14.3016.3 to allow a 34' wide driveway. Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary Vlx,t.AGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 7, 1990 CASE NO.: ZBA-94-SU-90, ZBA-95-V-90 APPLICANT: YUN WOOK YI ADDRESS: 812 SOUTH DEBORAH LANE LOCATION MAP: PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. ZONING: R-1 (Single Family Residential) LOT SIZE: 18,045 s.f. (137.75'x 1311) % COVERAGE: 43.6% FA—R.: 0.30 Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 M@1VL*1 The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow construction of a three -car garage per Section 14.1101.0.6. Concurrently, a variation is requested to Section 14.3016.3 to allow a 34 foot wide driveway rather than the permitted 21 foot width. Staff notes that the applicant also requested a variation to allow a Floor Area Ratio (FAR.) of 0.37 rather than the 0.35 allowed. The 0.37 F.A.R. was calculated based on the gross house dimensions shown on the site plan. Upon receipt of detailed building plans, the FAR. was recalculated using precise dimensions. The FAR. is actually 0.33, which is within the Code limitation and does not require a variation. Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a large single family house with an attached three -car garage at 812 S. Deborah Lane. The garage will be accessed by a driveway that widens to 34 feet in front of the three garage doors. All proposed setbacks meet or exceed Village Code requirements. The building height is also within the 28 foot height limitation for single family residential houses. Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The immediate neighborhood along Deborah Lane is characterized by moderate-sized single family homes. However, new developments of larger homes with three -car garages have occurred on Kennicott Court and more recently have been proposed for the adjacent Par 4 Subdivision. While three -car garages may not be the norm on Deborah Lane, they are fairly common in the immediate vicinity. A *15 foot utility easement exists along the entire east property line. The utilities in the easement will serve this lot and the one directly to the south. As proposed, the driveway will be constructed within the easement The applicant should be aware that in the event work is required in the easement, repairs to the driveway are the property owner's responsibility. The site plan also indicates that the driveway approach flares out to match the 30 foot width of an existing opening onto Deborah Lane. This additional paving is not necessary for automobile maneuvering. Staff suggests that the driveway be a maximum width of 21 feet where it opens onto Deborah Lane. This will minimize the potential for the driveway to be misconstrued as an extension of the street. It will also reduce the total paved area on the lot by 150 square feet or 1%. Most comments by other staff members relate to the construction of utilities and lot grading. Both Engineering and Inspection Services request that the driveway be a maximum 21 feet where it abuts the street. They also suggest that the 30 foot wide pavement stub at the south end of the cul-de-sac be removed and the bulb be completed with curb and gutter. Utility and grading plans must be submitted with the building plan set. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 The proposed house is very large, as indicated by the lot coverage and F.A.R. being only slightly below the maximum amounts allowed by Village Code. While it is substantially larger than other homes on Deborah Lane, it is also on a much larger lot. The lot is at the end of the cul-de-sac and the house will be set 40 feet back from the street. Staff notes that this house is similar in character and size to homes built or proposed in adjacent subdivisions. Three -car garages are becoming common features of these large houses, likewise, most over -sized garages require driveways wider than 21 feet. Staff does not have any major objections to this request, but suggests that approval of this request be conditioned on reducing the driveway width to 21 feet where it connects to Deborah Lane. DMC:hg CAF/ 1/9/91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS $12 DEBORAH LANE WHEREAS, Yun Wook Yi (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for a variation and special use as provided in Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 812 Deborah Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 2 in Shinjung Subdivision, being a Resubdivision of the West Half (1/2) of that part of Lot 4 lying West of a line that is 275.00 feet East of and parallel to the West line of Lot 4 as measured on the North line thereof (excepting from said part of Lot 4 and the North 475.0 feet thereof) in Division of the Louis F. Busse Farm, being the Northeast Quarter (1/4), except the West 686.40 feet of the Northwest Quarter (1/4) of said Northeast Quarter (1/4) of Section 15 Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, and except roads, according to Plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois on October 2, 1987 as Document Number 3656454; and WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a thirty-four foot (341) wide driveway at the garage entrance, rather than the permitted 241 and a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage, as provided in Section 14.1101.C.6; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the requests being the subject of ZBA 94 -SU -90 and ZBA 95-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of December, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 27th day of November, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the requests as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO:, The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a special use permit, as provided in Section 14.1101.C.6 to allow a 3 -car garage. and a variation to allow a thirty four foot (341) wide driveway at the garage entrance. The driveway is to be no wider than twenty-one feet (211) at the street. SECTION THREE: Except for the special use and variation being the subject of ZBA 94 -SU -90 and ZBA 95-V-90, all other applicable village ZBA 94 -SU -90 & ZBA 95-V-90 Page 2 of 2 of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR• In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of , 1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT: FREDIANI COURT SUBDIVISION LOCATION:_. ..FREDIANI COURT & BUSSE ROA DATE: AUGUST 30. 1990 ES NO ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED ENGINEER PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ENGINEER ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVAL PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB .WKS . DIR. INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL (514 INSP.SERV.DIR. FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE WATER MAIN FT. 195' - 8", 301- 6" SIZE SANITARY SEWER FT. 655' - 8" SIZE STORM SEWER FT. 476' - 15" 158' - 12 "SIZE ROADWAYS 1400 SQ.YD. SIDEWALKS 4750 SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS _ INSTALLED STREET LIGHTS 2 # 250 W. MERV.VAPOR PARKWAY TREES 18 # CASH FEE PARKWAY LANDSCAPING 1300 SQ.YD. RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS _ N/A PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED - N/A WATER MAIN FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE STORM SEWER FT. SIZE ROADWAY PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 1990. VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL PROJECT: PLAZA UNITED, PHASE I DATE: NOVEMBER 28 1990 Y4 NO ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVAL PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL C+ FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE WATER MAIN 765 FT. 10" SIZE SANITARY SEWER N/A FT. N/A SIZE STORM SEWER N/A FT. N/A SIZE ROADWAYS Nom_ SIDEWALKS 3,325 SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS N/A STREET LIGHTS RESTRICTIVE COVENANT PARKWAY TREES PUBLIC WORKS TO INSTALL PARKWAY LANDSCAPING COMPLETE RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N/A PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED ENGINEER CLERK CLERK ENGINEER PLANNING & ZONING PUB.WKS.DIR. INSP.SERV.DIR. FIRE PREVENTION WATER MAIN 250' - 611,_ 827' - 8" SANITARY SEWER 376' - 6" 750' - 8" STORM SEWER 685' - 10" 671' - 12' 487' - 15" 669' - 18" 171' - 24" 833' - 54" ROADWAY N/A PARKING LOTS 3,630 SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING PHASE I ONLY RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS PHASE I ONLY APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF _, 19 CAF/ rey"0344VI. Nkrelamlykov AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE BALLOT FOR THE APRIL 2, 1991 ELECTION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That pursuant to the authority vested in the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect by Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, 1970, an advisory referendum shall be held in the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, during the general election to be held April 2, 1991, for the purpose of submitting to the voters the following proposition: Shall the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect authorize the construction of a new Fire and Police Building at a cost of ? 11 SECTION TWO: "That the local election official shall certify the above public question to the election authority having jurisdiction over the territory of the Village of Mount Prospect in the manner provided by law. SECTION THREE: That Notice of said election shall be published and the form of the ballot shall be prepared in the form and manner provided by law. SECTION FOUR: That said advisory referendum regarding said public question and all matters pertaining thereto shall be conducted in the manner prescribed by statute for and during the aforesaid general election. SECTION FIVE: ' That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER 4n FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990 SUBJECT: ZBA-96-A-90, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits, for your consideration, their recommendation on three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1. Amend Section 14.503.B. to change the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time from 8:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. 2. Amend the existing regulations for home occupations in all residential districts, and add standards to allow home occupations in residential districts subject to certain performance standards, and appropriate definition in Section 14.2602. 3. Amend Section 14.101.G to clarify the interpretation of lot consolidations, and add a definition of "zoning lot" to Section 14.2602. The Zoning Board considered the amendments at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At the meeting, David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained the purpose of the proposed amendments as follows: Amendment 1 An earlier meeting time would allow the Zoning Board to handle more business at the regular meetings and potentially avoid special meetings during busy months., It would also reflect recent practice of the Zoning Board. This would establish performance standards to regulate home occupations that currently occur inconspicuously since the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance does not allow them outright. Staff feels that many home-based businesses are compatible in residential zoning districts provided they meet certain performance standards relative to number of employees; signage display; noise; outside storage; traffic generation, and other factors which could impact the neighborhood. Staff feels that measuring the appropriateness of a business based on its impact is preferable to developing an exhaustive list of permitted/excluded home occupations. John Fulton Dixon Page 2 AMendment 3 Under current regulations, when physical improvements, such as a room addition, are proposed on property consisting of more than one lot, but under single ownership, the owner must consolidate the lots in order to get a building permit. This situation usually occurs when two older, narrow lots have been developed as a single unit. Staff does not feel that there is a public benefit to requiring lot consolidation in many of these situations. The Plan Commission agrees that many lot consolidations are unnecessary except in cases where easements or street dedications are required. The proposed def-inition of "zoning lot" would recognize single tracts of land as buildable units for zoning purposes (setbacks, number of buildings on a lot, etc.). A zoning lot would not necessarily coincide exactly with one lot of record. Also at the meeting, Janet Hansen of the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce, stated support for Amendment 21 but suggested that one employee (non -family) be allowed for each home occupation, rather than staffs suggestion that no, non -family members be employed in home occupations. Tom McGovern of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission presented testimony in favor of Amendment 3. The Zoning Board discussed each amendment separately. They generally agreed that the amendments, as proposed, should be approved, but suggested some changes to the home occupation performance standards listed in the staff memo. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approved the three proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to include the following changes to the performance standards for home occupations as proposed by staff: 1. Delete Item #3: "No mechanical or electrical equipment shall be used or stored except such as permissible for domestic or household purposes." 2. To allow one non -family employee at a time, rather than a prohibition on any employees. DMC:hg MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 96-A-90 Hearing Date: December 13, 1990 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect SUBJECT PROPERTY: 100 South Emerson PUBLICATION DATE: November 27, 1990 REQUEST: Amend Section 14.503.B. to change the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time from 8:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Amend the existing regulations for home occupations in all residential districts, and add standards to allow home occupations in residential districts subject to certain performance standards, and appropriate definition in Section 14.2602. Amend Section 14.101.G to clarify the interpretation of lot consolidations, and add a definition of "zoning lot" to Section 14.2602. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager ABSENT: Lois Brothers Micheale Skowron OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Margaret Gaweke, 416 S. Mt. Prospect Road. Janet Hansen, Chamber of Commerce. Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting amendments to the Zoning Ordinance. 1. Amend Section 14.503.B to change the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time from 8:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. 2. Amend the existing regulations for home occupations in all residential districts, and add standards to allow home occupations in residential districts subject to certain performance standards, and appropriate definition in Section 14.2602.2 3. Amend Section 14.101.G to clarify the interpretation of lot consolidations, and add a definition of "zoning lot" to Section 14.2602. ZBA-96-A-90 December 13, 1990 Page 2 of 3 The petitioner, Davin Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, presented the case stating that the first request has to be formally changed in the Zoning ordinance, to reflect the current meeting time. Mr. Clements stated that the second request is to allow home businesses in certain situations, noting that the Planning and Zoning department receives many calls regarding this and they must tell them this is not allowed. He noted that in the community a widerange of inconspicuous home businesses exist, many of which have Illinois revenue numbers. Home based businesses vary from contractor's offices, part-time caterers, artist studios, to computer consultants Staff typically becomes aware of home occupation if it is one that disturbs neighbors'. Theses matters are investigated on a complaint basis. It wouldbe appropriate to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow home occupations, if the home-based business met certain standards. For example, a home occupation should have no employees, display no sign, nor have any retail sales on premise. Also, no home occupation should include storage of supplies or inventory. Many communities regulate home occupations based on such performance standards, and this ,would be a reasonable approach for Mount Prospect to consider. Mr. Clements then introduced Mrs Janet Hansen, executive director with the Chamber of Mount Prospect. Mrs. Hansen stated that the Chamber of commerce had voted in favor of allowing home businesses in the Village of Mount Prospect and presented the Board with facts founded by the Chamber of Commerce. The Board then reviewed the comments made by the Chamber of Commerce. They also separately considered the standards presented in the staff memo. Mr. Clements stated that amendmen "zoninglot" would allow existing more than one lot, under single o as a single buildable unit for zol purposes. Undercurrent regulatio improvements, such as a room addi property-consisting`of more than ownership, the owner must consoli get a building permit. This situa older, narrow lots have been deve Staff does not feel that there is requiring lot consolidations in m Tom McGovern of the Mount Prospec that the Plan Commission agrees w feels that many lot consolidation # 3 and the definition of roperties consisting of nership,'to be considered ing and building permit s,' when physical ion, are proposed on ne'lot, but under single ate the lots in order to ion usually occurs when two oped as a single unit. a public benefit to ny of theses situations. Plan Commission stated th staffs proposal and are unnecessary except in 2BA-96-A-90 December 13, 1990 Page 3 of 3 cases where easements or street dedications are required. The Board then generally discussed the amendments noting that for amendment number 2 they make the following changes to the standards listed in the memo from staff: 1. Delete item *3 pertaining to mechanical and electrical equipment. They felt item * 4 would cover any problems associated with the use of such equipment. 2. Change item # 6 to allow on non -family member employee at one time rather than no non -family employees as suggested by staff. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request with the changes to Amendment 2 as discussed. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Lannon seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon,. Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W -- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1990 SUBJECT: ZBA-96-A-90, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AMENDMENTS To THE ZONING ORDINANCE REQUEST This application for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance was filed by the Village of Mount Prospect. Three amendments are proposed as follows: 1. Amend Section 14.503.8. to change the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time from 8:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. 2. Amend the existing regulations for home occupations in all residential districts, and add standards to allow home occupations in residential districts subject to certain performance standards, and appropriate definition in Section 14.2602. 3. Amend Section 14.101.G to clarify the interpretation of lot consolidations, and add a definition of "zoning lot" to Section 14.2602. These amendments will be discussed individually. The Zoning Ordinance establishes the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time as 8:00 p.m In August of 1990, the Zoning Board determined that the meeting time should be changed to 7:30 p.m., to perhaps handle more business at the regular meetings, in hopes of avoiding special meetings every month during the busy spring and summer season. This amendment merely changes the meeting time as stated in the Zoning Ordinance. The Chamber has suggested that the Village consider adopting standards that would allow home occupations. On August 28, 1990 Janet Hansen, Chamber Executive Director, preliminarily discussed home occupations at a Committee -of -the -Whole meeting. At that time, the Village Board determined it would be appropriate to refer the matter to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a public hearing. Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2 It is recommended that the following Sections be amended: Amendment to ADD Home Occupations, as defined herein, to the following Sections as permitted uses: R -X 14.1001A R-2 14.1301A R-1 14.1101A R-3 14.1401.A. R -A. 14.1201A R-4 14.1501A Amendment to DELETE Home Occupations from the following Sections, as specifically excluded uses: R -X 14.1001.B.5 R-2 14.1301.B.4 ,R-1 14.1101-B-5 R-3 14.1401.B.5 R -A 14.120I.B.5 R-4 14.1501.B.5 ADD to Section 14.2602 the following definition: HMIA 4MUZROM . Home Occupations to be permitted in all residential zoning districts, subject to the following definition and performance standards- Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3 HOMC ocCupation is an accessory use conducted completely within a dwelling unit, carried on by any member of the immediate family residing on the premises, clearly incidental and secondary to the use of the dwelling for residential purposes. The following standards shall govern the operation of a home occupation: 1. There should be no sign, display or alteration that will indicate from the exterior that the home is being utilized in whole or in part for any purpose other than that of a dwelling. 2. No substantial amount of stock in trade shall be kept or commodities sold. 3. No mechanical or electrical equipment shall be used or stored except such as permissible for domestic or household purposes. 4. No offensive noise, vibration, smoke fumes, odor, heat or glare or electrical interference shall be noticeable at or beyond the property line. 5. No explosive or combustible materials shall be used. 6. No person shall be employed other than a member of the immediate family residing on the premises. 7. No outside storage of any kind related to the home occupation shall be permitted. 8. The home occupation shall not generate traffic or parking in excess of what is normal in a residential neighborhood. 9. The home occupation shall not utilize more than 25 percent of the gross floor area of the dwelling unit. 10. A professional person may use his residence for infrequent consultation, emergency treatment, or performance of religious rites, but not for the general practice of his profession. Staff believes it is best to regulate home occupations based on such performance standards, because this provides a measurement of impact on a neighborhood. This is considered preferable to creating a lengthy list of permitted home occupations, which might not be able to list every reasonable home business. Amendment 3 The Scope of Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 14.101.G, states that it is unlawful "to construct one building on more than one lot, or to occupy more than one lot by more than one main use." This is being interpreted to mean that a principal building, such as a house, cannot be on more than 1 lot, or the portion of any lot. For example, there are many homes built on two 25 foot lots. If a resident, Gil Basnik, Chairman Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 4 in such an example, hopes to add a room addition, current policy requires that the two 25 foot lots be consolidated or combined into a 50 foot lot. In consolidating the two 25 foot lots into one 50 foot lot, the resident then has only one building on one lot, meeting the intent of the current requirement. This is an expensive and unnecessary burden for a property owner. If a home has existed for years on two 25 foot lots, or some similar example, and it is being properly assessed, there is no public benefit to having the property owner consolidate the parcel, in order to get a building permit for a room addition or other improvement. The Plan Commission has reviewed a number of such lot consolidations over the years, and does not believe such a requirement is necessary. However, the Plan Commission notes that consolidation plats should be done if there is the need for easements or street dedications. The Plan Commission recommends that the Zoning Board take appropriate action to amend Section 14.101 to eliminate the lot consolidation requirement. Staff recommends that Section 14.2602, Definitions, be amended to add a definition of "zoning lot", as follows: I&LZgning is a single tract of land located within a single block which (at the time of filing for a building permit) is designated by its owner or developer as a tract to be used, developed, or built upon as a unit, under single ownership or control. Therefore, a "zoning lot or lots" may or may not coincide with a lot of record. With this definition, a tract of land is designated a buildable unit for zoning purposes, thus not having to coincide exactly with one lot of record. In researching this matter, staff found that a number of other suburban municipalities utilize a zoning lot definition for similar purposes. Further, staff recommends that the statement found in 14.101.G be deleted. DMC:hg CAF/ 1/9/91 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE WHEREAS, Village of Mount Prospect (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application to make certain text amendments to Chapter 14 (zoning ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois; and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks amendments to Sections of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) as follows: 1. To Amend Section 14.503.8 to change the time that the Zoning Board of Appeals meets from 8:00 P.M. to 7:30 P.M.; To delete Section 14.101.G; and 3. To amend Section 14.2602 to create and add a definition of "Lot, Zoning" WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 96-A-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of December, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 27th day of November, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 96-A-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That Section 14.101 entitled "Scope of Regulations" of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting paragraph G in its entirety and renumbering the remaining paragraphs. SECTION THREE: That paragraph B of Section 14.2602 entitled "Rules and Definitions" of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence the definition of Lot, Zoning, so that hereinafter, Section 14.2602.B shall include the following: LOT, ZONING: A single tract of land located within a single block with (at the time of filing for a building permit) is designated by its owner or developer as a tract to be used, developed, or built upon as a unit, under single ownership or control. Therefore, a "zoning lot or lot" may or may not coincide with a lot of record." SECTION FOUR: That Section 14.503.8 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the time ZBA 96-Z-90 Page 2 of 2 of eight o'clock (8:00) P.M. and substituting therefor seven thirty o'clock (7:30) P.M.; so that hereinafter said paragraph B of Section 14.503 of Chapter 14 shall be and read as follows: if B. Regular meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals shall be held in the Senior Citizen Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois on the fourth Thursday of each month at the hour of 7:30 o'clock (7:30) P.M., or at such other location or time as may be designated by the Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals, following reasonable notice thereof. 11 SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL PROJECT: Schoenbeck Road Street Lights raffic signals only LOCATION: Rand Road & Schoenbeck o DATE: November 27 1990 YES ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVALi PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL la INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL PUBLIC IMPRgVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE NO ENGINEER CLERK CLERK ENGINEER PLANNING & ZONING PUB.WKS.DIR. WATER MAIN NIA FT. N/A SIZE SANITARY SEWER N/A FT. N/A SIZE STORM SEWER N/A FT. N,/A SIZE ROADWAYS N/A SIDEWALKS N/A SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS N/A STREET LIGHTS YES # 2 PARKWAY TREES N/A # PARKWAY LANDSCAPING N/A RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS N/A TRAFFIC SIGNALS @ RAND ROAD YES INSP.SERV.DIR. FIRE PREVENTION WATER MAIN FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE STORM SEWER FT. SIZE ROADWAY PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF _, 19 CAF/ 12/20/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION XIV OF CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2014 entitled "Schedule XIV Fire Lanes" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting said Section 18.2014 in its entirety and substituting therefor the following; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2014 shall be and read as follows: Sec. 18.2014. Schedule XIV - Fire Lanes. In accordance with Section 18.1321.A, and when signs are erected giving notice thereof, no person shall at any time block or obstruction the following described districts, streets, driveways, areas or parts thereof: a, 7OOVV.LINCOLN STREET Lincoln School The one lane paved driveway on both sides of the service and pick-up area in front of the school, which driveway is located immediately adjacent to the said school with entrances and exits off Lincoln Street. Also, the paved circular drive located adjacent to the east aide of the school with entrance and exit off Condota Ave. 11O18.UNNEMANROAD St. John's Lutheran School The circular paved driveway adjacent to the front of the buildings. 1SO0VV.LONN[]U|STBOULEVARD Oliver W. Holmes School All those curb lanes of the circular driveway on the south side of the echVo|. Also, the entire blacktop area on the north side of school. 2-40 N. MAIN STREET Central Plaza The one lane adjacent to the building and sidewalk on the east aide of the building and the two lanes on the north side of the building. 348.MAIN STREET Two lanes adjacent to the north side of the building. 17O1-1725VV.MANSARD LANE Mansard [ane Apartments The paved alley from the curb at the southeast corner of 1701 Mansard west tothe north curb ofMansard Lane. 411S.MAPLE STREET Lions Park Community Center The circular driveway on the west side of the property. 1200NWHIGHWAY Meadows Condos Paved driveway adjacent to curb north of the building. Meadows Park Pool The circular drive on the north aide of the building. 7DOK8BER S». Cecelia Catholic Church The paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the 1000-1145 MT. PROSPECT PLAZA K8L Prospect Plaza The two lane driveway that in immediately adjacent to the building and sidewalk on the front of the building. The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to the west side of the building and the two lane drive adjacent to the south side of the plaza. 11OONVVHIGHWAY Paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building. 1835 W. PHEASANT TRAIL John Jay School The easterly most side of the paved driveway on the north side of the building. 415 E.PROSPECT AVENUE Prospect Apartments Paved driveway adjacent to and around sides and rear of building. 501 E.PROSPECT AVE. Prospect Gardens All paved driveways throughout the complex except for designated parking spaces. 601-605 E.PROSPECT AVENUE Timber Lane Apartments Both lanes of the paved driveway to the east of 803 Prospect Ave. and the paved driveways in the parking lot south of complex excluding designated parking areas. 1255NiPROSPECT AVENUE Kenilworth The paved alley connecting Kenilworth and Waverly. 1E. RAND ROAD LFish Company The two paved kunao adjacent to and around the perimeter of the 20ERAND ROAD Holiday Inn The two lane paved driveway adjacent to the west and north sides of the building from Rand Road to Kensington Road. 300E. RAND ROAD K4oBridea The easterly paved driveway adjacent to the building from Rand Road to Kensington Road and the circular drive adjacent to the front of said building, except designated parking areas. 750ERAND ROAD Courtesy Home Canter The two lanes of the paved driveway adjacent to and around the 823 E. RAND ROAD Thunderbird Bowl The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to the front of the 827 E. RAND ROAD The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to the building and midevxe|h on the front of the building. 8Q0-834E.RAND ROAD Paved driveway adjacent to the south, east and north sides of the 2O1W.RAND ROAD Forest City The two lanes of the paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building and sidewalks of the property. 700 W. RAND ROAD {]\d CJnohand Country Club The paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the 802RIVER ROAD McDonald Condos The paved lane tothe north of the buildings and the two lane paved drive along the south and west sides of the buildings. 580 SLAW|NCCWHT The two lane paved drive adjacent to the east side of the driveway. 625GLAW|N COURT Heidelberg Eastern The paved drive adjacent to the west side of the building. 18S. SCHOOL STREET SL Pauls Lutheran School The west side of School Street between Busse Ave. and a point located. 196' north thereof. 1701 NiVICTORIA DRIVE Jamestown Estates The two lane paved roadways throughout the projeot, including the following utnaeba: Victoria Drive; Annamarie Drive; yWarriahiU Drive; Hoze|hiU Drive; Phillip Drive; and Dennis Drive. 280-290 N. VVESTGATE ROAD Westgate Apartments The two lane paved driveway throughout the development including the curved driveways. 1699 WALL STREET Both lanes of the driveway immediately adjacent to the west side of the building from Montgomery Street to LaSalle Street. 6SUN.WHEELING ROAD Both sides of the building immediately adjacent to the north side of the building from Wheeling Road to the parking lot entrance. 8OON.WHEELING ROAD The paved circular drive in front of the building. 899N.WHEELING ROAD Both lanes of the driveway immediately adjacent to the south aide of the building from Wheeling Rood to the east parking |mL 3D-22SVV.VV|k8BOLTONDRIVE The north curb of the paved mad. 350 N. WOLF ROAD Winona School of Photography The paved circular driveway adjacent to the front of and the one lane adjacent to the south side of the building. 9OON.WOLF ROAD Northwest Assembly of God The paved drive adjacent to the north side of the building. 1DOON.WOLF ROAD River Trails Junior High School The paved circular driveway and the paved roadway adjacent to the eoat, south and west sides of the school. 333VV.RAND ROAD Frano|s Cadillac The paved drive adjacent to the building and along the perimeter of 1601VV.ALGON{JU|N {Sanens| Building The two lane paved driveway immediately adjacent to building. 1821-1661 VV.ALG{]NClU{N Plaza United Shopping Center Paved driveway along north side of building (rear of building). Paved driveway around anUno perimeter of the building. 1703-1759 W. ALGCJNCJU|N Crystal Court Shopping Center Paved drive along the entire length of the south side of the building. 1761-1769 Ni ALGONQU|N Cinnamon Cove Paved driveway adjacent to west side of building. 1803-1843 W. ALGC)NC�]|N Bhanwood Plaza Paved driveway directly south of building (entire length). 1960-2036 W. ALGCJN(]U|N Prospect Commons The paved driveways and sidewalks adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building. 2070-2100 W. ALGONC8J|N Algonquin Trails Apartments .AU paved driveways located at 2070-2100 W. Algonquin Road. 900 E.ARDYCE Centennial North Paved driveways west, north and east of building. 2D1ARTHUR AVENUE Commonwealth Edison The lane adjacent to and immediately surrounding the entire 1805 ASPEN Robert Frost School - The west side of Cypress Ohws between Eva Lane and Front Drive adjacent to the school. - The circular driveway on the west side of the school. 7S9N.B|ERMANCIRCLE Patterson Dental Both lanes of the driveway from Bierman N. Circle to the front entrance of the building. 00MLBIEHMANCIRCLE Mitsubishi The paved lane adjacent to and along the entire length of the north side of the building. 16OOBISHOP COURT Stenograph Corporation The paved drive adjacent to and around the building. 155OBISHOP COURT Network Services The paved driveway adjacent to the west aide of the building. 919-1019 BOXWOOD AND 500 DCGVV[OO Randwood Towers Condominiums The two lane paved driveway from Dogwood Lane to Boxwood Drive. 1474-1498S.BROWNSTONE LANE Algonquin Lane Apartments All of Brownstone Lane including the paved driveways between the buildings. 805 N. BURNING BUSH The east curb lane of Burning Bush Lane. between Kensington Road and the rear aooama driveway including the paved area along the north side of the building. 1321N.BURNING BUSH SL Thomas Becket Church The paved driveway which has entrance and exits on N. Burning Bush Lane and circles behind the building. 1313N.BURNING BUSH Burning Bush Trails Park The two lane circular driveway in front of the building. 134OBURNING BUSH Indian Grove School The west side of Burning Bush Lane in front of the echoo|, between the drives on the north and south sides of the school. 41Oand 412 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Research Products, Triangle Marketing The two lane paved drive throughout the parking lot on the west and east sides of the building. 411BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE, 47SBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Kensington Office Center The two lane paved drive throughout the complex. 478BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE TCI The paved drive adjacent to the south and west sides of the building. 620 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE International Beothn. Prospect Fastener The two lane paved drive adjacent to and west of the building, 55UBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Salton The two lane paved drive to the west of the building. 655BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Channi|eo Technologies 700E.BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Searle Both lanes of the curved drive adjacent to the southwest corner of the building, 8O0BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Mitsubishi The paved lane adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building. 8O1BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Xyte| Both lanes of the curved driveway adjacent to the southwest corner of the building. 900 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Mitsubishi The two lane paved drive adjacent to the south and east sides of the building. 1O00E.BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Graco The paved drive along the east side of the building. 110OBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE The two lane paved drive adjacent to the west side of the building. 12D0BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE The paved drive adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building. 1221BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE GTE The paved drive adjacent to the mast and south sides of the building. 1331 BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Kodak The paved drive adjacent to the vvaot side of the building. 14OOBUSINESS CENTER DRIVE Kay-Hay/Sensa}( The paved drive adjacent to and around the building. 1441BUSINESS CENTER DRIVE K8an/e| The paved drive adjacent to the north and west sides of the building 111E.BU8GEAVENUE First Chicago Bank of Nb. Prospect The paved two lane drive around the building. 105 S. BUS8EROAD Westbrook School The one lane driveway on either side of the service and pickup area in front of school. Also, the driveway located adjacent to the school with entrances and exits off Busse Road. 14ODS.8USSEROAD Timberlake Apartments The paved driveway located around the perimeter of the property except for the designated parking areas. 1500 S.BUSSEROAD SK. Johns Apartments The one lane immediately adjacent to and around the entire perimeter of the buildings including the private roads known as Knights BridDe, Hather|eiQh, White Chap|a and Canford C|iffo, except the designated parking areas. 555 CARBOY Vanguard Tool The paved circular drive in front of the building. 1601 W. CARBOY WmADuguid Co. The paved ninn|n drive in front of the building. 1SOO-2DDOB.CARBOY Prospect Industrial Center SOOE.CENTENNIAL Centennial Apartment South All paved drives adjacent to the building. 3OUVV.CENTRAL ROAD U.S. Poet Off ice The one lane paved driveway adjacent to the north curb of the parking lot from the entrance on Central Road to Elmhurst Street and the paved driveway adjacent to the north side of the building. 500 W. CENTRAL ROAD Both sides of the driveway from the north line of Centra{ Road to the west property lire of the rear parking lot.... 6O3-715VV.CENTRAL ROAD Central Village Condom The two |onoo of the paved driveway between 707-709 W. Central from the east end of VVhitagpde Circle to the north curb of the parking lot. The two lanes of the paved alley adjacent to the south side of 801 W. Centra( to the northeast corner of the parking lot between 607 and GOS W. Central and the two lanes throughout the parking lot. GD0CENTRAL ROAD Central Park Center Paved driveway connecting Central Road and rear parking lot on east side of building. 1084 E. CENTRAL ROAD VVa|Qremne The paved drive adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building. 1400 E. CENTRAL ROAD St. Emily's School Both sides of the circular driveway located on the south side of the 1800 W. CENTRAL ROAD K4u|tiQrophice The paved driveway located adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building including the front circular drive. 1701-1751 W. CHARIOT COURT Phorroho Apartments Both lanes of paved driveway throughout the complex. 111E. RAND ROAD Citicorp All paved drives around the perimeter of the building including the entrance and exit drives onto Rand Road. 475 ENTERPRISE The Colony Apartments All paved driveways upon the property. 250NiPARLIAMENT Old Orchard Colony Country The paved lane behind the building at 1400 Yormmuth, and behind the building located at 250 Par|imeoL The roadways which include RoadiUy Circ|e, Bridgeport Drive, Fairmont, Par|iment and Yarmouth. 9014701 COTTONWOOD,15O\ S.BU8SEROAD Cottonwood Apartments Driveway adjacent to and along the south side of the buildings. 300 E. COUNCIL TRAIL Lion's Park School North side of Council between Elm and School Streets. 1717-1777 CRYSTAL LANE Crystal Towers The two lanes of the paved driveway located around the perimeter of the buildings. The single lane access road between buildings. 301365VV.DEK8PSTER Hawthorne Apartments Both lanes of the paved driveway commonly known as Hawthorne 420VKDEMPSTER All the curb (anes, as well as the easterly most and westerly most lanes of the parking lot at the south side of the building. 501-571VV.DBMPSTER Pickwick Commons South The two lane paved driveways throughout the development. 600-684 VK OEK4PSTER and 601-685 p|CNVVCK COURT Pickwick Commons West Both lanes of the curved driveway at the east end of the parking lot between GOO W. Dempster and 601 Pickwick Court. Paved munaas drive between the buildings from L|nnemun Road to the east property -1550DEK8P8TER Alpine Apartments Driveway directly east of building. -1540DEK4PGTER Alpine Apartments 15 feet either side of the fire hydrant located on the northwest corner of the building. '1530DEW1PGTER Alpine Apartments Driveway directly west of building. -1520DENYPSJER Alpine apartments 15 feet in either direction of the fire hydrant located on northeast corner. 30ON.ELMHUHSrAVENUE Northwest Convent Church The paved driveways adjacent to and along the north and west sides of the building. 401455S.E0NHUR@TROAD Elmhurst Road Apartments The two lane paved alley from Pine Street to Shabonee Trail, 998N.EUMHURGTROAD RANDHURS7 VVurdm Auto Canter The paved driveway immediately adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building. 999 N. ELMHUR3T ROAD RANDHURST Loronzos The paved driveway adjacent UJ the southeast side of the building located at the southwest corner of the Randhurot Shopping Center. 999 N. ELMHURST ROAD RandhurstQnema The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to the building and sidewalk on the south side of the building. 999 N. E0MHURST ROAD RANDHURST Jewel Osco The curb lane of the driveway adjacent to the egst, south and west sides of the building. 989N.ELMHURSTROAD Randhurst Shopping Center The two lane driveway immediately adjacent to and around the entire perimeter of the building and sidewalk of the bui|ding, except the designated "customer pick-up" areas and the inner lane of the underground drive in the basement. 1000-1050 S. EUNHUHSTROAD Golf Plaza U The two lane driveway that is immediately adjacent to the building and sidewalk on front side of building except for the designated .customer pick-up" area. 14OUN.ELMHURSTROAD Orchard Vale Condos Both lanes of the curved driveway adjacent to the front entrance of the building, both lanes of the paved driveway throughout the parking lot area and the one lane paved driveway adjacent to the no,th, wast and south aides of the building. 1452-58N.E[MHURSTROAD Orchard Vale Tnwnhomes The east lane of the paved road commonly known as Woodridge Lane, 1500G.ELK8HURST ROAD Venture Department Store The paved driveway immediately adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building from Elmhurst Road to the perimeter driveway around the building. 23OU-23GGG.EUNHUR8TROAD Colony Square Shopping Center The two lane paved driveway adjacent to the south and east curb in front of the building. Also, the paved driveway located behind the building. 1DS.EMERSON K8L prnopen1 Library The vvaot curb of Emerson Street directly adjacent to the main building entrance. 1901ESTATES DRIVE Forest View School All those curb lanes on both sides of west drivevvay, and south aide of estates on north side of school. 55E.EUCLID AVENUE First National Bank K8L Prospect The two lane paved drive adjacent to the south side of the building. 1600 E. EUCLID AVENUE River Trails Pool The entire paved driveway (exclusive of parking area). 1624E. EUCLID AVENUE Grace Lutheran Church The paved driveway adjacent to and around the building. 3DON.FAIRVIEW Fairview School The circular driveway on the property extending from the south aide of Gregory Street to the west side of Fairview Avenue. 851FEEHANV|LLEDRIVE Gestetner The paved lane adjacent to the south side of the building. 852 FEEHANV|LLEOR|VE WC| Financial The paved drive adjacent to the south side of the building. 8S1FEEHANV|LLEDRIVE Cummings -Allison Both lanes of the drive from Feahanvi||e Drive to the south end of 902FEEHANV\LLE DRIVE Business Services The pawed drives adjacent to the oast and west sides of the buildings. 803FEEHANV|LLE DRIVE Piher The paved drive adjacent to the west side of the building. 1001FEEHANV!LLE DRIVE Lees Marketing Inc. The paved drive adjacent to the east side of the building. 115OFEEHANV|LLEDRIVE Bang &{]|ufuen The paved drive adjacent to the east side of the building. 1250 FEEHANV|LLEOR|VE Toko The paved drive to the vvaet of the building. 145OFEEHANV|LLEDRIVE yWak(ta The two lane paved drive adjacent to the east side of the building. 18DDFEEHANV|[LEDRIVE TDK The paved driveway adjacent to the east and south aides of the 1601FEEHANV|LLE DRIVE Kensington Commons 1GG1FEEHANVILLEDRIVE Kensington Office Plaza The two lane paved driveway adjacent to the south and west sides of the building. 170D-28FOREST COVE DRIVE Forest Cove The paved driveways located adjacent to and around the perimeter of the development. The paved drive between 1723-1719 and 1701- 1705 Forest Cove Drive. 605VKGOLF ROAD Trinity United Methodist Paved driveway east and south of the building excluding designated parking areas. 1701-1755VV.GOLF ROAD Golf Plaza | The two lanes of the paved driveway adjacent to and around the perimeter of the building and sidewalks except designated "Customer Pick-up" area. 1821 W. GOLF ROAD Mount Shire Apartment The paved driveways around the perimeter of the buildings including the designated interior paved sidewalks between the buildings. 2O9OVV.GOLF ROAD Peace Reformed Church Paved driveway adjacent to the curb along the north side of the building. 400E.GREGORY Life Christian Church/College Both lanes of the south driveway. 3O1417HAVVTHORNECIRCLE Oak Terrace Apartment All paved driveways excluding designated parking areas. 11O1 -11U3 HUNT CLUB DRIVE Huntington Condom The two lane paved driveway and circular driveways adjacent to the building. 5nO5U2HUNT|NGTONCOMMONS ROAD Huntington Condos The two lane paved driveway around the property. 551-571 HUNT|NGTON[;ONM[)NS ROAD Huntington Towers The two lanes of the paved driveways adjacent to the buildings as well as the circular driveways. 601-625HUNT|NCTONCOMMONS ROAD Lakeside Condos The paved driveways around the property. 700VV.HUMT|NG[ON COMMONS ROAD Knights of Huntington Both |mnaa of all the paved streets throughout the complex. 147JUDITH ANN DRIVE Judith Ann Towrhomeo Both lanes of the paved alley and parking lots. 303 E. KENSINGTON ROAD Wild Stallion Cafe The single lane paved driveway adjacent to and along the east and 350 E. KENSINGTON ROAD Child World The two lane paved driveway adjacent to the curb lane on the north and east sides of the building. 601 E. KENSINGTON ROAD NutraSweet The paved driveway adjacent to the east, south, and west sides of the building, 1400 E. KENSINGTON ROAD Feehanville School The paved circle drive to the west of the school. 801 W. KENSINGTON ROAD Prospect High The entire circular driveway located on the front having exits and entrances of the south side to Kensington Road. Also, both lanes of the west and south driveways located along and adjacent to the west and south sides of said school from Kensington Road to Forest Avenue. 1699 S. WALL STREET Lake Center Plaza Both lanes of Montgomery Street, their entirety. Wall Street and LaSalle Street in 431 LAKEVIEW COURT The two lane paved drive adjacent to and around the building. 104-112 E. LINCOLN and 310-348 S. MAPLE The paved driveway adjacent to and west of buildings. 401-549 E. LINCOLN STREET Lions Park Condos The paved driveway from William designated parking areas. Street to School Street excluding SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form the manner provide by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. -Fields Village Clerk Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 11, 1991 SUBJECT: ATTACHED REQUEST FOR THE VILLAGE TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT BRIARWOOD DRIVE AND ALGONQUIN ROAD As you will recall, the Village approached the Village of Arlington Heights for participation in this light. They have refused to do so. Therefore, all of the local share cost will be borne by the Village of Mount Prospect. We have reviewed the plans and with discussion with the Brownstone Court Apartment complex and the State, we have agreed that there would not be a traffic signal at Brownstone Court. This is a one-way entrance into the housing complex. Therefore, there will not have to be loop detectors in the road surface. That also eliminates one of the Opticoms since there will not be exit from this drive. One of the requirements the State places upon us is future maintenance for stop bars and cross walks on the pavement. I recommend that the Board authorize the Mayor to enter into a Contract agreement with IDOT at a cost to the Village of slightly under $40,000. C JOHN FULTON DIXON JFD/rcw attachment EXHIBIT A WHEREAS, the VILLAGE has entered into an Agreement with the State of Illinois for the installation of traffic control signals and oOPTICOM" at the intersection of IL 62 @ Briarwood Drive/Brownstone Court, known as STATE Section 116TS-3(90) and as VILLAGE Section 90 -00I09 -00 -TL and, WHEREA5, in compliance with the aforementioned Agreement' it is necessary for the VILLAGE to appropriate sufficient Motor Fuel Tax Funds to pay its share of the cost of said traffic signal installation. ' NOW/ THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that there is hereby appropriated the sum of $37`566.67 (THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND FIVE HUNDRED SIXTY-SIX AND 67/100 DOLLARS or so much thereof as may be necessary, from any money now or hereinafter allotted to the VILLAGE under provisions of the Motor Fuel Tax Law, to pay for its share of the cost of this improvement as provided in this Agreement; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon award of the contract for this improvement, the VILLAGE will pay to the Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois, in a lump sum from any funds allotted to the VILLAGE, under the Motor Fuel Tax Law, ' an amount equal to 95% of its obligation incurred under this Agreement, and will pay to the said Department the remainder of its obligation (including any non-pazticpating costs for FA projects) in a lump sum' upon completion of the project based upon final costa; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the VILLAGE agrees to pass o supplemental resolution to provide necessary funds for its share of the cost of this improvement if the amount appropriated herein proves to be insufficient to cover said cost. Passed this day of , 19 AYES STATE OF ILLINOIS ) VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT > S5 NAYS COUNTY OF COOK ) ABSENTI', Clerk in and for the t, hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect, and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the at a meeting on A.D., 19 . -------- APPROVED IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this ___ day of A.D., 19 . ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF --- TRANSPORTATION Clerk District Engineer S E A L PL4N APpg0VAL WHEREAS, in order to facilitate the improvement at the intersection of IL 62 @ Brlarwood Drive/Brownstone Court, the VILLAGE hereby approves the plans and specifications for the proposed traffic signal installation at the said intersection. ATTEST: By: Date: 3 E A L CAF/ 1/11/91 RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RELATIVE TO THE SIGNALIZATION OF ALGONQUIN ROAD AND BRIARWOOD DRIVE WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determine that it would be in the best interest of the village to participate with the State of Illinois Department of Transportation to install a traffic signal at the intersection of Algonquin Road and Briarwood Drive; and WHEREAS, in order to proceed with the proposed improvement it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees that the best interest of the residents of the Village would be served by entering into an Agreement with the Illinois Department of Transportation relative to sharing in the cost of said improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby express their desire to participate in the cost of installing a traffic signal at the intersection of Algonquin Road and Briarwood Drive, which intersection is located within the corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION Two:. That the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his signature on an Agreement between Village and the Illinois Department of Transportation relative to the installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Algonquin Road and Briarwood Drive, a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1991. ATTEST: 6 Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ErAffj WAWA Gerald L. Farley Mayor UM "L -j Lowpoix 'bnrwsft Resolution for Improvement by Municipality Construction Of TranSPbirtatim Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the , MAYOR Council or President and Board of Trustees of the VILLAGE City. Town or Village of MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS Illinois that the following described street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Code: Name of Thoroughfare Route From To ILLINOIS RTE 62 ALGON UIN...,ROAD) 'TATE SECTION 116TS-3(90) or i i rum i rit:m Mr-CiULVtU, 1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of INSTAT-- N OF TRAFFIC CONTROL STaN,ATS BRIARWOOD DRIVEZBROWNSTONE COURT. and shall be constructed and be designated as Section 91-09109—QP---TL feet wide 2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional) sum of THIRTY SEVEN THOUSAND, FIVE WJUDRED six — AUn r.-7 Dollars ($_3 )forthe improvement of said section from the municipalit Py's allotment of Motor Fuel Tax' funds. 3. That work shall be done by CONTRACT (Specity Contract or Day Labor) ;and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk is hereby directed to transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district otfice of the Department of Transportation. APPROVED 19 Department of Transportation District Engineer BLR 4103 (Rev. 6/86) IL 494-0352 Mr. Immss VJLIJA&GF� Clerk Mrs. (City. Town, of Village) inand fpr the VTLLAaF of MOUNT PRO,9,PECT (City, Town, or Village) County of -COOK hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the -TRIISTEPS (Councilor president and Board of Trustees) JANTIARY ]5 1, 1 19 91 IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this day of (SEAL) (City, Town, or Village) A.D. 19_ Clerk. Village of (—ou nt Prospect Moun't Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director of Inspection Services DATE: January 8, 1991 SUBJECT: 1991 Pavement Investigation Attached find a memo from project engineer - Fred Tennyson regarding proposals received for our annual pavement investigation program. We currently have $8,000 budgeted for this item. since we did get a very good bid from H.H. Holmes Laboratories, Inc. I not only recommend we accept the proposal from Holmes but also recommend we award the contract for a "not to exceed" the budgdt amount of $8,000. This will allow us to take advantage of these prices to test some additional streets. Chuck CB/m Village of Mounts Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Director, Inspection Services FROM: Project Engineer DATE: January 4, 1991 SUBJECT: 1991 Pavement Investigation On December 10, 1990, I received 3 proposals to do 109 Pavement cores on streets throughout the Village. These streets are candidates for the resurfacing program (see attached list). These proposals include: 1.) H.H. Holmes Laboratories, Inc. $3,951.63 2.) O'Brien & Associates, Inc. $6,500.00 3.) Soil & Material Consultants, Inc. $7,605.50 After comparing all 3 proposals, I recommend that the Village accept the proposal from H.H. Holmes Laboratories, Inc. This project will be paid for from Motor Fuel Tax Funds from Account 22-037-06-6615 (Page 78 - 1990/91 Budget) which currently hds $8,000.00 Fred Tennyson I concur with the above recommendation. Jiff. Wulbecker JAW:FT/m, 1019 Tei„I.tr ----- Wirt er CY"eeri A,-2Yl,yo a Le.ne ;. . E,r—VF �r. -:.yl.lca '_&rle r H. :Drive 5. l _� Elfr E,, eet s, 'iayeT' r,.r'tr`ee.+- k7�_IMhr'-1'rst A'verll.te 7. erlry 5tYeet . Gres'G hiver,lje c.lrrlhurst Avenf-i.e 8. _ erson ;reet Eer-I,ra1 R, ad r-.1zhland Averlue �» _Lrr Street -entra1 Rc�a.d Orepor^y Street .0, na l Street Cenral Road Sregory Street wen Street :sane :a Street aregory Street c. wiIIiam Street Cer,,ral Read Henry Street ..,. -o-tis Street Cenral Road Thayer Street 14. Ed Ward Street Central Road Henry Street ,f. -,eery Street Owen Street Maned Road Audrey Street Cerl.ral Road Bonita Avenue :7. Audrey Court Audrey Lane Cul Le Sac .E. -athy vane Central Road Candota Avenue ine :street Roue 83 Prosoect Avenue Z2. oka Avenue Council Trail LincoIr• Street ._.1 . "va'Wa'.a H'ver11_te Lr_Irtncuist Eo1_tievar'd iyarlawa Trail L_. WaGei is Avenue LO'ri-iC 111 St �''•�t,ulevard aWa Trag Nani c:3. _ _.,.a AVerll,te �.QY17,101Uist iiouievard Hiawatha Trail 24. Hiawatha Avenl_le Route 83 Manawa Trail 5. "arawa ?rail wawata Avenue Route 83 vFl. 5-1a.00nee Tr~ail Scn_ol Street Edward Street ,E7. Council Trail Eme-son Street Louis Street a. ==rkshire Lane Scl-rool Street William Street -:9. School Street Sna:)r,nee "ra.ii =erw.s`rire Lane ZO. Ower, Street Shaoonee Trait HerKshire Lane ,,,I. Louis Street Shanonee Trail S. End Ecward Street Prospect Avenue `. Erld 63. Alert Street Drospect Avenue S. End 3`. ;'unset Road William Street Edward Street S. Fern Drive Willow Lane Dalm Drive 36. Eircn Drive Willow Lane :'alrr Drive 1,7. Catalpa Lane Fern Drive Robert Drive 36. Ferre Drive Cottonwood Lane Willow Large 39. Hirci "Drive Cottonwood Large Catalpa Large Q. Chestnut Drive Cottonwood Lane Catalpa Lane 1019 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois >uz INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JANUARY 11, 1991 SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF SQUAD CARS During Budget reviews for this upcoming Budget, there has been taken out of the Budget all requests for additional automobiles in the Police Department over and above squads and in the Budget, there is only a request for the 17 squad cars to be replaced in the Department. I recommend that the Board concur with the recommendation of the Police Chief that we go out for purchase of those vehicles so that we will be able to take advantage of the low price for 1991 Chevrolet Caprice squad car package from the State purchase. We do not have to waive bidding since the State bid is in an acceptable bidding format for the Village to use. The Village Board would have to accept the bids of the State purchase for 17 Chevrolet Caprice squad cars in this upcoming Budget. A JOHN FULTON DIXON JFI)/rcw attachment MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT FORMAL MEMORANDUM CHF 91 -07 1 1 —to/ number TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: RONALD W. PAVLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE (90PL_&1Z_ SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION FOR THE PURCHASE OF NEW POLICE CARS DATE: 9 JANUARY 91 The Police Department's thirty vehicle fleet consists of seventeen patrol vehicles, four community service officer/court vehicles, three staff cars, five detective cars, and one leased tactical unit car. In FY91-92 the Police Department's seventeen marked patrol vehicles are scheduled for replacement. This portion of the police fleet is comprised of sixteen 1989 Chevrolet Caprice sedans and one 1987 Chevrolet Caprice sedan. All but two of these vehicles will have registered 50,000 - 70,000 miles prior to replacement under this request. The two vehicles with less than 50,000 miles will be retained and used to replace two 1985 Chevrolet Celebrity sedans used by Community Service Officers for parking enforcement and other non -emergency functions. The two Celebrity sedans have high mileage and their mechanical condition has deteriorated to the point where replacement is advisable for maintenance and safety reasons. Under the Police Department's Fleet Management Program, marked squads are recommended for replacement every 2 years/50,000 miles. This schedule was developed from an evaluation of squad maintenance and repair costs, resale value considerations ($4,500 for squads with less than 60,000 miles), and vehicle performance and safety issues. In the past the Department has purchased police squads under the State contract for police pursuit vehicles, which is awarded through a competitive bid process. Due to the number of purchases that are made under the State award, the vehicle and option prices in the winning bid are lower than any prices that could be realized by a municipality in an independent bid process. Since the police car specified in the State award is substantially the same as the squad car specified by this department, it saves time and money to purchase these vehicles under the State contract. Two years ago the Police Department purchased 1989 model year Chevrolets at a per unit cost of $13,040.00. The per unit cost for 1991 'model year Chevrolet Caprice sedans under the State award is $12,510.00. one reason for the lower per unit cost in the 1991 award may be Chevrolet's determination to maintain consumer interest in the Caprice squad package despite a radically different Caprice body style. If so, this cost reduction may not be continued in the 1992 Chevrolet bid. To guarantee delivery of the new squads in the 1991 model year, orders must be placed by February 22, 1991. Orders received after that date will not be promised and will be filled on a "will try" basis. Police staff requests the Village Board be asked to waive the bid process for the purchase of seventeen (17) marked police squads and that they be asked to authorize the placement of an order for these vehicles by February 22, 1991 under the State award at a per unit cost of $12,510.00, with a total expenditure of $212,670.00 . As this purchase will be made from the FY91-92 budget, a May 1, 1991 delivery date will be stipulated with the vehicle order. If you have any questions regarding this matter please feel free to contact me. cc: Deputy Chief Daley Deputy Chief Richardson Dave Jepson, Finance Director