HomeMy WebLinkAbout4185_001Next Ordinance No. 4266
Next Resolution No. 52-90
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Wednesday
senior citizen Center January 2, 19 ,January 2, 1991
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip'# Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Donald Weibel
Ill. INVOCATION - Trustee Arthur
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SPECIAL MEETING, December 11, 1990
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, December 18, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Acknowledge contributors to the Christmas Food Drive
and STAR Program
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 82 -SU -90, Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL
USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED WITHIN THE MOUNT PROSPECT
COMMONS SHOPPING CENTER
At the request of the Petitioner, action on this
Ordinance has been continued to the January 15, 1991
meeting of the Board.
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
ENTITLED "PUBLIC PASSENGER VEHICLES" OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance increases the taxi -cab fares for
companies licensed to operate in the Village. (Exhibit A)
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN
ADVISORY REFERENDUM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A
PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE BALLOT FOR THE
APRIL 2, 1991 ELECTION
This Ordinance establishes a referendum question
as to whether the voters will support the
construction of a new Fire/Police Building. (Exhibit B)
D. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
1990/91 BUDGET (Exhibit C)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 93 -SU -90, 2218 S. Busse Road
The Petitioner is requesting a special Use
to amend the Planned Unit Development for
property commonly known as the Rosenow
Industrial Park to permit a car wash. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this Special Use by a vote of 5-1.
B. ZBA 94 -SU -90 and ZBA 95-V-90, 812 Deborah Lane
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use to
permit a 3 -car garage and a variation to permit
a driveway 34 feet wide. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommends granting these requests by
a vote of 6-0.
C. ZBA 96-A-90, Text Amendments
This case proposes the following amendments to
Chapter 14 (Zoning ordinance):
1. To change the meeting time of the Zoning
Board of Appeals from 8:00 PM to 7:30 PM;
2. To permit home occupations in all residential
zoning districts, with certain performance
standards; and
3. To revise the requirements for lot consolidation.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
the requested text amendments by a vote of 5-0.
D. A RESOLUTION IN PROVIDING FOR THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT TO PERFORM CERTAIN MAINTENANCE
WITHIN STATE RIGHTS-OF-WAY
This Resolution, presented on an annual basis,
allows the Village to perform various projects
within the State rights-of-way without requiring
a permit for each project. (Exhibit D)
E. A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 17-86
RELATIVE TO PERSONS WHO SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM
PAYING FOR A MOUNT PROSPECT MOTOR VEHICLE
LICENSE
This Resolution is being amended to exempt
members of the Recycling commission and Sign (Exhibit E)
Review Board from paying for a vehicle sticker.
F. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
This Resolution authorizes the annual Agreement
to provide emergency services of the Fire
Department to the Forest River Fire Protection (Exhibit F)
District.
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Property and Liability Insurance Proposal
B. Medical Insurance Claims Administrations Proposal
C. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
A. Discussion of the State Surcharge Tax
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DECEMBER 11, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee George Van Geem
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Corcoran.
NEW BUSINESS
Mayor Farley nominated Donald C. Weibel to fill the
unexpired term of Trustee Theodore J. Wattenberg,
through April 30, 1991.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to accept the appointment of Donald C. Weibel as
Trustee.
Trustee Corcoran stated that while he respects
Mr. Weibel, he could not support his nomination
due to the fact that he felt the experience of a
former Trustee is necessary in light of the upcoming
budget discussions.
Trustee Corcoran also asked how many votes were
necessary to declare a motion passed, due to the
fact that Trustee Floros was absent.
Mayor Farley read a legal opinion from Everett Hill
stating 3 affirmative votes would be necessary to
declare a motion passed. Mr. Hill was citing sections
of the State Statutes.
Trustee Arthur stated that he would like to nominate
Norma Murauskis. It was the ruling of Mayor Farley
that no other nominations could be accepted until
the vote on the existing motion had taken place.
Mayor Farley read a letter from Trustee Leo Floros
expressing his support for the appointment of
Don Weibel to the Village Board.
Upon roll call on the motion to nominate
Donald C. Weibel as Village Trustee, term to
expire April 30, 1990, the following votes were cast:
Ayes: Busse, Van Geem, Farley
Nays: Arthur, Corcoran
Absent: Floros
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to adjourn the Special Meeting.
Upon roll call: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 7:48 P.M.
CALL TO ORDER
Velma Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
Page 1 of 1 - December 11, 1990
INVOCATION
NOMINATE
DONALD
WEIBEL,
VILLAGE
TRUSTEE
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DECEMBER 18, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Donald Weibel
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Floros.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
the Mayor and Board of Trustees held December 4, 1990.
CALL TO ORDER
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Pass: Busse
Abstain: Weibel
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$1,090,638
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
6,711
Community Development Block Grant Fund
19,671
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
92,748
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
818,366
Parking System Revenue Fund
3,371
Risk Management Fund
63,051
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
2,513
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
4,202
Special Service Area Const. #5
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
-
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
163,927
Flexcomp Trust Fund
7,651
Escrow Deposit Fund
49,057
Police Pension Fund
690
Firemen's Pension Fund
-
Benefit Trust Fund
2,167
$2,324,763
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
accept the financial report dated November 30, 1990,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVE
MINUTES
Page 2 - December 18, 1990
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
EUCLID AVENUE
A resident on Euclid Avenue stated that Euclid Avenue
IMPROVEMENT
is scheduled for improvement and widening by the County
or State and 'expressed concern relative to the fact
that the residents were not given the opportunity for
input. He also stated that he has concerns for the
safety of the residents in the area due to the high
rate of speed on Euclid and the proximity of the
roadway to"the homes.
MAYORS REPORT
Mayor Farley requested the resident to contact the
Village Manager for additional information and a
possible response to the concerns voiced.
PRESENTATION:
The Mount Prospect Police Explorers presented a plague
POLICE EXPLORERS
to the Mayor and Board of 'Trustees in appreciation for
the continued support of this youth program.
POLICE OFFICER
Mayor Farley and Police Chief Pavlock presented
OF THE YEAR
the Officer of the Year and the three Runner's Up for
that honor as follows:
Officer John Dahlberg, officer of the Year
Officer Joseph Belmonte Runner -Up
Officer John Gross, Runner -Up
Officer Anthony Kotlarz, Runner -Up
THANKSGIVING
Village Manager Dixon announced the names of those
CONTRIBUTORS
residents and organizations who contributed funds
and/or food to the Human Services Division for
distributionatThanksgiving.
PROCLAMATION:
Mayor Farley presented a proclamation acknowledging the
SAM'S PLACE
contributions of Sam's Place on Prospect Avenue, for
the continued financial support of the STAR program.
HOLIDAY SEASON
A Resolutionwas presented recognizing the Holiday
Season.
RES.NO. 51-90
Trustee Weibel, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 51-90
A RESOLUTION FOR THE HOLIDAY SEASON
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem Weibel, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPOINTMENTS
Mayor Farley requested concurrence of the Board; in
appointing the following residents to Commissions:
Earl Sutter, 205 S. Lancaster, to the Finance
Commission to replace John Mussar who resigned.
William Donovan, 9 North Owen, to the Recycling
Commission to replace Steve Polit who resigned.
Carl Maas, 117 S. Edward, to the Recycling Commission,
to replace Brian Robertson who resigned.
EARL SUTTER:
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
FINANCE COM.
concur with the recommendation of the Mayor and appoint
Page 2 - December 18, 1990
0
Earl Sutter to the Finance Commission, term to
expire 5/1/93.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floras, moved to
appoint William Donovan to the Recycling Commission,
term to expire 5/1/93.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
to appoint Carl Maas to the Recycling Commission, term
to expire 5/1/91.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
WILLIAM
DONOVAN:
RECYCLING
COMMISSION
CARL MAAS:
RECYCLING
COMMISSION
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 88-V-90, 911 South Elmhurst Road ZBA 88-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that 911 SOUTH
would allow a 40 foot wide driveway, rather than the ELMHURST ROAD
permitted 21 feet, in order to replace an existing
driveway and parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4265
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 911 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to reconsider the vote taken at the last meeting,
relative to implementing an Employee Assistance
Program, which motion failed.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floras, Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: Arthur, Corcoran
Motion carried.
It was noted that the Employee Assistance Program will
provide initial counseling for the employee and
dependents. The counselors will then refer the client
to the appropriate agency. This program will cost
$5,300 per year.
Page 3 - December 18, 1990
ORD.NO.4265
EMPLOYEE
ASSISTANCE
PROGRAM
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
authorise participation in the Employee Assistance
Program effective February 1, 1991, at a cost of $5,300
for the year.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: Arthur, Corcoran
Motion carried.
ZBA 82 -SU -90
ZBA 82 -SU -90,
Mount Prospect
Commons Shopping Center
MOUNT PROSPECT
An Ordinance
was presented for first reading that
COMMONS SHOPPING
would grant a
Special Use in
order to operate a
CENTER -
billiard parlour/cafe in
this shopping center
BILLIARD/CARE
located at
the northwest corner
of Golf and Busse
PARLOUR
Roads.
The zoning Board of Appeals had heard this request and
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-1,
however, due to the fact that the Park District had not
received notice this matter was remanded back to the
Zoning Board of Appeals in order for appropriate notice
to be given to all parties.
Having heard this case for the second time, the Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting the request by
a vote of 4-1.
The Petitioner noted that the request remained the same
for a billiard parlour/cafe with 39 billiard tables and
seating for approximately 120 people in the restaurant
area. It was also noted that if this request is
granted a request will be submitted for a Class 'IS"
liquor license.
Several residents voiced their opposition to this
operation based on concerns dealing with the proximity
to the park and the fact that patrons of the
establishment may over indulge and either drive drunk
or loiter in the adjacent park.
An Ordinance will be presented January 2, 1991 for
second reading.
AMEND CH. 11 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
amend Article XI of Chapter 11, which provides for an
increase in the taxi -cab rate. A Public Hearing was
held on this request from American Taxi at the
Committee of the Whole meeting on December 11th.
village Manager Dixon noted that the staff would like
to have the effective date of this increase delayed in
order for notice to be given to the Senior Citizen
population.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floras
Nays: Busse, Van Geem, Weibel, Farley
Motion failed.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading on
January 2nd.
REFERENDUM An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
QUESTION: place a referendum question on the April ballot
FIRE/POLICE which asks if the residents would support the
BUILDING construction of a new Fire and Police Building.
Page 4 - December 18, 1990
Inasmuch as the Ordinance presented did not include
a dollar amount nor the proposed location of the
building, it was determined by the Board that
additional discussion should take place regarding
the proposed located of the new building. The two
locations include the existing location or on Pine
street (the former Public Works building). It was
also noted that discussion is scheduled for January 5th
on the downtown redevelopment and that may directly
affect the decision on the location for the new building,
if the referendum receives a favorable vote.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
amend the 1990/91 budget.
David Jepson, Finance Director, noted that the major
amendments involve the Risk Management Fund and the
Parking Fund.
This Ordinance will be presented January 2nd for
second reading.
VILLAGE KANAGERIS REPORT
A proposal was presented from R.J.N. Environmental
Associates, Inc. for the engineering design service
for a storm relief sewer on Wa Pella between
Central Road and Weller Creek at a cost not to
exceed $44,579.
There was discussion as to the scope of this
improvement. It was explained that the proposed
improvement would alleviate flooding in the area
for a 1125 year flood" however, when rainfall is
extreme, as in a 100 year flood, flooding would
still be a problem.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to accept the proposal received from R.J.N.
Environmental in the amount of $44,579 for the
engineering design for the Central Road/Wa Pella
storm sewer improvement.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Village Manager Dixon requested that funds for the
sewer rehabilitation project in the Prospect
Meadows area be re -allocated. It was noted that
the contractor, Joel Kennedy Contractors, took
a longer period of time to complete the project
than originally planned which required the
on-site engineering firm, Donohue, to spend
additional time. The contractor has agreed to
reduce the contract amount by the additional
amount billed by Donohue, $3,300.
Mr. Dixon requested the Village Board to authorize
the reallocation of funds and increase the Donohue
contract from $70,000 to $73,300 and reducing the
contract with Joel Kennedy by $3,300.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Weibel, moved
to increase the contract with Donohue by $3,300
Page 5 - December 18, 1990
BUDGET
AMENDMENT
CENTRAL/
WA PELLA
STORM
SEWER
JOEL KENNEDY
CONTRACTORS:
PROSPECT
MEADOWS SEWER
Page 6 - December 18,1990
for the Prospect Meadows sewer rehabilitation project
and reduce the contract with Joel Kennedy by $3,300
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PUBLIC SAFETY
The Village Manager presented a request for funds to
BUILDING
provide electrical service to the oldcourt room in the
REMODELING
Public Safety Building, 112 East Northwest Highway.
Due to the unsafe condition of :the annex building, it
is proposed that the detective division be moved out
of that building and into the old court room space,
which will be remodeled to accommodate 12 people. It
is anticipated that $6,500 will cover the cost of
providing the electrical service and remodeling, which
will be done using Village personnel..
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
authorize an expenditure of $6,500 in order to provide
electrical service and remodeling of the former court
room in the 112 East Northwest Highway building.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
STATUS REPORT
Village Manager Dixon stated that the new building
housing Central Dispatch has been completed and the
first meeting will be held in the new facility next
week.
The Village has received verification that the 1991
Community Development Block Grant Funds have been
approved by the Federal Government.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
STATE SURCHARGE
Trustee Van Geem asked the Board to discuss and make
TAX
a recommendation to the State relative to the Surcharge
Tax and whether the Village would support the
continuation of this tax, which was originally proposed
as a temporary tax.
Mayor Farley asked that this subject be placed on the
nett Committee of the Whole agenda for discussion.
EXECUTIVE
SESSION
EXECUTIVE SESSION
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
go into Executive Session for the purpose of
discussing pending litigation.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Flcros,
-Van .Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Board went into Executive Session at 10:20 P.M.
Page 6 - December 18,1990
The meeting was reconvened at 11:22 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Arthur
Trustee Busse
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Floros
Trustee Van Geem.
Trustee Weibel
It was noted that the Village Board met in Executive
Session for the purpose of discussing pending litigation.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
authorize the Manager and/or Mayor to execute an
Agreement with the Elk Grove Rural Fire Protection District
to resolve the matter of CH 86-0050; double taxation of
26 single family residences who were not being provided
services by the Fire Protection District while they were
being taxed. This will assure that they will not be taxed
in the future. The Agreement stipulates that the Village
will not use the dismissal in any Court proceedings
presently pending between the Fire Protection District
and the Village.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Weibel
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:23 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 7 - December 18, 1990
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Fund
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
December 27, 1990
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
12/14/90 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
12/13/90
12;27190
List of Bills
Entry 12127/90
$ 2,869,820
$ 753,761
$464,459
$ 3,159,122
280,331
101,511
6,582
375,260
868
23,001
23,160
709
329
25,250
9,863
15,716
3,255,099
155,749
49,699
3,361,149
152,327
4,877
1,411
155,793
1,113,699
237,436
63,515
1,287,620
361,447
-
1,219
360,228
347,038
1,794
3,863
344,969
123,022
56,937
-
179,959
1,375,807
-
400
1,375,407
10,643
3,425
6,000
8,068
1,259,479
16,950
13,588
1,262,841
15,161,618
114,148
39,549
15,236,217
17,096,121
123,546
41,634
17,178,033
254,965
2 582
257.547
43.662.613
X51.620.967
$724,942
k44,558.638
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ARNOLD SEWER
BISHOP PLUMBING COMPANY
JOSEPH CAPPUCCITTI
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COUNTY SEWER
ALFRED DESLAURIES
DAVID DIDIER
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
EVER READY
FARNESI ASSOCIATES
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
GULDEN-BITTEL SEWER SERV.
HAGGE CONSTR. CO.
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
LEOPARDO CONST.
MAJESTECH CORP.
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
O'BRIEN PROPERTIES
PETER O'HALLORAN
OPUS
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
PEPPER CONSTRUCTION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
POSTAGE BY PHONE SYSTEM
ARTHUR J. ROGERS & CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND
REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
BOND
REFUND
$100.00
BOND
REFUND
$100.00
$200.00
R/E
TRANSFER TAX REBATE
$350.00
8350.00
PMT
P/R 12/27/90
$224.25
$224.25
BOND
REFUND
$55.00
BOND
REFUND
$25.00
$80.0
BOND
REFUND
$35.00
$35.00
BOND
REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
P/R
ENDING 12/27/90
$390,525.76
P/R
ENDING 12/27/90
$1,146.14
P/R
ENDING 12/27/90
$918.17
P/R
ENDING 12/27/90
$30,025.24
$422,615.31*
BOND
REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
BOND
REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
DUE
TO FED DEP PAY
12/13
$9,862.51
DUE
TO FED DEP PAY
12/13
$69.60
DUE
TO FED DEP PAY
12/13
$52.81
DUE
TO FED DEP PAY
12/13
$2,482.27
DUE
TO FED DEF PAY
12/13
$916.76
$13,383.95*
BOND
REFUND
$.100.00
$100.00
BOND
REFUND
$420.00
$420.00
PMT
P/R 12/27/90
$254.00
$254.0
BOND
REFUND
$500.00
5500.0t,
BOND
REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
PPRT
8TH ALLOCATION
$949.25
$949.25*
BOND
REFUND
$7,865.00
BOND
REFUND
$400.00
$8,265.00
BOND
REFUND
$90.00
$90.00
BOND
REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
DEC
FIRE PENSION DISB
$41,634.19
DEC
POLICE PENSION
DISB
$39,548.81
$81,183.00*
BOND
REFUND
$450.00
$450.00
MISC
EXPENSE
$10.00
$10.00*
POSTAGE
ADVANCE DEPOSIT
$3,000.00
$3,000.00*
BOND
REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ROUSE RANDHURST CORPORATION
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
S G C CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
PAUL SNEAD
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
GEORGE SOLLITT CONST.
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
CHRISTINE STELTER
HEALTH INS CONT
REFUND
$26.16
$26.16*
FRANK H. STOWELL
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
THYGESEN BUILDERS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C5002
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C5203
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C6012
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C6592
$100.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C6631
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C6919
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C6954
$25.00
REINSPECTTON
FEE
- C7050
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C7419
$80.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C8195
$15.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C8287
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
- C8352
$75.00
$570.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REIMBURSEMENT
$6,000.00
$6,000.00
XYTEL CORP.
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$541,105.92
GENERAL FUND
$395,751.77
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK
GRANT
$1,215.74
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$9,862.51
WATER & SEWER FUND
$32,507.51
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$970.98
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$26.16
POLICE PENSION FUND
$39,548.81
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$41,634.19
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$6,000.00
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$13,588.25
VENDOR
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SOCIAL ENGINEERING ASSOC.,INC.
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MISC EXPENSE
DIRECTORY
$75.54
PACE 3
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$56.54 $56.54*
$19.00 $19.00
***TOTAL** $75.54
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GLASS, HILL,
DALLMEYER & ROTH,
SERVICES RENDERED
$8,764.10
88,764.10
HOLY FAMILY
HOSPITAL
EMP PHYSICAL - JASTER
$193.00
$193.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$80.67
$80.67
PETTY CASH -
FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSE
$10.70
MISC EXPENSE
$75.80
MISC EXPENSE
$48.25
$134.75*
PETTY CASH -
FIRE DEPT.
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$65.29
$65.29*
VON BRIESEN
AND PURTELL, S.C.
SERVICES RENDERED
$2,084.26
$2,084.26
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $11,322.0 -
GENERAL FUND $11,322.07
********************************************************************************************************
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
JOHN KEANE COMM ASST C.O.W. MTG $15.00 $15.00
CAROLYN A. MILLER COMM ASST - BD MTG $25.00 $25.00
PHYLLIS MOLIERE COMM ASST - C. 0. W. MTG $15.00 $15.00
TASCHO SAEMS COMM ASST - BD MTG $25.00 $25.00
VENDOR
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
FRANK SMITH
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
COMM ASST - BD MTG
SUPPLIES
$173.12
PAGE 4
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$25.00 $25.00
$68.12 $68.12
***TOTAL** $173.12
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DECISION DATA SERVICE INC.
MTCE - SEPT, OCT, NOV & DEC
$336.00
$336.00
THE DRAWING BOARD
SUPPLIES
$150.56
$150.56
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE
$29.46
$29.46
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSE
$12.10
MISC EXPENSE
$8.53
$20.63*
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
NOV - SERVICES RENDERED
$1,102.50
$1,102.50
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$123.26
$123.26
SENTRY ENVELOPE CO.
ENVELOPES
$2,339.80
$2,339.80
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$4,102.21
GENERAL FUND
$4,102.21
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
.JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS DISPLAY ADVERTISING 5368.55 5368.55
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $118.76 $118.76
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICES $448.96
LEGAL NOTICE $102.37
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. SUPPLIES $73.00 $73.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
LEGAL NOTICE
$53.62
LEGAL NOTICE
$65.81
$670.76
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER
$2,270.99
$2,270.99*
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$3,429.06
GENERAL FUND
$3,429.06
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
ADMIN FEES - DECEMBER
$3,503.10
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 12/13/90
$28,282.15
MED CLAIMS THRU 12/19/90
$19,709.20
$51,494.45*
CONNECTICUT MUTUAL LIFE
ANNUAL PREMIUM - PAVLOCK
$2,398.03
$2,398.03
GAB BUSINESS SERVICES INC.
REIMBURSEMENT
$136.00
REIMBURSEMENT
$717.00
REIMBURSEMENT
$892.25
$1,745.25
HMO ILLINOIS
HEALTH INSURANCE - DECEMBER
$7,567.53
$7,567.53
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SERVICES RENDERED - LEONARD
$165.50
$165.5
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C.
SERVICES RENDERED
$118.50
$118.5(
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$63,489.26
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$63,489.26
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. SUPPLIES $73.00 $73.00
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS ASSN.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
TREASURER, STATE OF ILLINOIS
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALEXANDER BATTERY CO., INC.
CADE INDUSTRIES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF CHIEFS
LITTLE AMERICA
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS S OFFIC
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SEMINAR - WULBECKER, VANDERNICK
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC EXPENSE
MISC EXPENSE
MISC EXPENSE
MISC EXPENSE
MISC EXPENSE
MISC EXPENSE
MANUAL
$417.54
PAGE 6
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$90.00
$90.00
$153.75
$153.75
$11.89
$4. 27
$401.15
$5.19
CLNG SUPPLIES
$65.00
$233.7
$12.48
$7.60
$16.96
$95.79
$5.00
$5.00
***TOTAL** $417.54
PARTS
$80.60
$90.60
BATTERIES
$250.00
BATTERIES
$401.15
$651.15
CLNG SUPPLIES
$233.75
$233.7
BH66-JT-5422-A
$7.60
$7.60
FRONT END ALIGNMENT
$39.00
MAINTENANCE
$39.00
MAINTENANCE
$143.36
$221.36
SERVICE
$134.76
$134.76
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$350.00
$350.00
PRISONER FOOD - NOV 90
$124.50
$124.50
SUPPLIES
$46.03
$46.03
TACTICAL UNIT CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.00
PARTS
$30.00
PARTS
$60.00
$90.00
SUPPLIES
$63.96
$63.96
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$37.39
$34.20
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$16.37
$53.76'
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$31.10
$37.37
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
MISC EXPENSES
$104.68
MISC EXPENSES
$2.00
$154.44
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
MISC EXPENSES
$20.09
$107.48
EDUCATION ALLIANCE
MISC EXPENSES
$12.00
$187.50
MUTUAL ENG. CORP.
MISC EXPENSES
$8.00
x
f ff SQRY
A
MISC EXPENSES
$7.59
S185.46*
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
STRAYS - NOVEMBER 90
$504.00
$504.00
QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC.
CRIME ANALYSIS REPORTS
$45.70
$45.70
SAVE -A -PET
STRAYS - NOVEMBER
$175.00
$175.00
RODNEY SMITH
EXPENSES
$30.00
$30.00
SOMAR ENTERPRISES
AMMUNITION
$1,926.30
$1,926.30
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$5,023.93
GENERAL FUND
$4,773.93 CAPITAL
IMPRV. & REPL. FUND
$250.00
*******************************************************************************************************
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
A-AAGO LOCK SERVICE
MTCE SUPPLIES
$34.20
$34.20
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
CONF AIEFARE - THILL
$278.00
$278.00
B & H INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$37.37
$37.37
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
DONUTS/HAZMAT CLASS
$65.34
DONUTS/HAZMAT CLASS
$89.10
$154.44
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
HOLIDAY LETTERHEADS
$107.48
$107.48
EDUCATION ALLIANCE
COMPUTER MTCE
$187.50
$187.50
MUTUAL ENG. CORP.
PRINTING & LITERATURE
$95.00
$95.00
f ff SQRY
A
MEMBERSHIP - KORDECKI
$60.00
$60.00
FLORIDA EMERGENCY MEDICINE FD.
REGISTRATION - THILL
$275.00
$275.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PACE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
H R HART PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$160.72
$160.72
IFPA MEMBERSHIP
DUES - JACKSON
$20.00
$20.00
ICE, INCORPORATED
OXYGEN CYLINDER RENTAL
$19.00
$19.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$411.81
SERVICE
$25.62
SERVICE
$20.24
$457.67
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS FOUND.
REGISTRATION - DAWSON
$125.00
$125.0
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
IL FIRE INSPECTORS DUES
$45.00
$45.O6
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
SUPPLIES
$254.07
SUPPLIES
$89.81
$343.88
MINE SAFETY APPLIANCES COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$13.30
SUPPLIES
$10.80
$24.10
NATIONAL FIRE PRCT. ASSOC.
MEMBER RENEWAL - CAVELLO
$75.00
$75.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
NOVEMBER - 3 VISITS
$225.00
S225.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL, SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$17.78
$17.78
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
PARTS
$28.58
$28.58
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$86.58
$86.58
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$28.32
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$10.22
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$27.80
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$20.00
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$8.00
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$27.35
t
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$18.00
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$1.61
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$8.76
$150.06*
RADIO SHACK
ANSWERING MACHINE
$99.95
$99.95
RON SCHMIDT
EQUIPMENT
$200.00
EQUIPMENT
$200.00
$400.00
SECRETARY OF STATE
TITLES
$15.00
$15.00*
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
***TOTAL**
$3,522.31
GENERAL FUND
$3,522.31
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT
DATE 12(27(90
VENDOR
PURCHASE
DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
JAN SERVICES
RENDERED
$28,299.00
$28,299.00
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
***TOTAL**
$28,299.00
GENERAL FUND
$28,299.00
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
LEONARD W. BAZAN
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$18.00
$18.00
DARYL BOYD
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$12.00
$12.00
HAZEL FRICKE
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$6.00
$6,00
CAROLYN, HENDERSON
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$9.00
S9.00
BILL HESS
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$12.00
$12.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
SERVICE
$16.77
SERVICE
$19.33
SERVICE
$43.38
$79.48
LISA LEVIN
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$9.00
$9,00
RAY LUNDIN
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$21.00
$21,00
EARLE MATTSON
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$12.00
$12.0( -
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$218.26
$218.26._'
BILL PAINE
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$12.00
$12.00
OTTO SCHERR
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$12.00
$12.00
JEANNE SHERMAN
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$9.00
$9.00
BERTHA STEIL
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$15.00
$15.00
KATHI WESLEY
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$12.00
$12.00
HELEN WHITLOCK
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$6.00
$6.00
VIRGINIA ZITO
DRIVER REIMB
- NOV
$12.00
$12.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$474.74
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $474,74
********************************************************************************************************
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
ASPEN EXTERIOR CO., INC.
GRECO CONSTRUCTION
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PENTAX CORPORATION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
STREET DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AKZO SALT INC.
AM= -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
AMCO INDUSTRIES INC.
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
CDBC 316 N OWEN
$13,515.00
$13,515:00
CDBG - 1013 GREENFIELD
$5,779.11
$5,779.11
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,400.00
$1,400.00
EXHIBIT SPACES
$270.00
$278.91
EXHIBIT SPACES
$270.00
$540.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$45.47
$45,47
CAMERA LENS REPLACEMENT
$16.34
$16.34*
MISC EXPENSE
$5.00
MISC EXPENSE
$4.50
$9.50*
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,250.00
$1,250.00
***TOTAL**
$22,555.42
$611.31 COMMUNITY
DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$21,944.11
MTCE SUPPLIES
$6.20
MTCE SUPPLIES
$104.00
PARTS
$54.16
PARTS
$20.58
ROAD SALT
$6,581.81
CLNG SUPPLIES
$278.91
MICE SUPPLIES
$336.37
SUPPLIES
$30.63
SUPPLIES
$82.10
$184.94
$6,581.81
$278.91
S336.37
$112.73
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
BLS ENTERPRISES, INC.
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
CADE INDUSTRIES
CENTURY TILE SUPPLY COMPANY
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONRAD AND SON
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS, IN
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
FORBES INCORPORATED
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
JACK'S
KAR PRODUCTS INC
LEIDER GREENHOUSE - PRAIRIE VI
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MATERIAL SYSTEMS, INC.
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE. 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
UNIFORM SERVICE
$75.59
UNIFORN SERVICE
$75.58
$151.17
KEYS
$11.80
CYLINDER & KEY CHANCE
$56.96
$68.76
REPAIR PARTS
$198.00
$198,00
MTCE PARTS
$77.54
977.5' -
SUPPLIES
$72.59
$72,;
CLNC SUPPLIES
$413.70
SUPPLIES
$255.02
SUPPLIES
$255.02
SUPPLIES
$255.02
SUPPLIES
$255.02
SUPPLIES
$255.02
$1,688.80
SUPPLIES
$107.51
SUPPLIES
$73.72
$181.23
BF80-JT-17006
$117.05
$117.05
MICE SUPPLIES
$18.44
$18.44
PARTS
$60.25
$60.25
PARTS
$34.32
$34.32
SERVICES
$45.00
$45.00
ELECTRICAL SERVICE
$300.00
$300.00
SUPPLIES
$85.00
SUPPLIES
$85.00
SUPPLIES
$110.12
$280.h
SUPPLIES
$73.15
$73.15
PARTS
$244.19
$244.19
FLOWERS
$335.00
$335.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$718.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$103.95
$821.95
SUPPLIES
$207.94
$207.94
EQUIPMENT
$165.59
EQUIPMENT
$336.30
EQUIPMENT
$192.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$35.54
EQUIPMENT
$1,632.00
$2,361.43
ANNUAL DUES
$15.00
$15.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12%27%90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
NATIONAL INFORMATION DATA CENT
ZIP CODE BOOKS
$34.90
$34.90
NORTHERN ILLINOIS HORT. ASSOC.
TO REVERSE VOIDED CK 1149073
$60.00-
$60.00*
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$47.04
$47.04
OHM ELECTRONICS
SUPPLIES
$91.54
SUPPLIES
$23.64
$115.18
PATTEN ENERGY SYSTEMS
PARTS
$130.78
$130.78
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
TRNG SUPPLIES MTG
$42.80
$42.80
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$38.80
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.66
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$12.37
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$.45
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.60
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$6.40
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$8.56
$71.84*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$187.63
PARTS
$64.30
$251.93
PROSAFETY
SUPPLIES
$552.00
$552.00
R. C. TOPSOIL
NOVEMBER 90 - DIRT
$135.00
$135.00
RECYCLING TODAY
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$25.00
$25.00
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
NOV SERVICES
$1,766.49
$1,766.49
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$37.96
$37.96
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
DECEMBER PEST CONTROL
$48.00
DECEMBER PEST CONTROL
$48.00
DECEMBER PEST CONTROL
$48.00
DECEMBER PEST CONTROL
$48.00
DECEMBER PEST CONTROL
$48.00
$240.00
SOCIETY OF MUNICIPAL ARBORISTS
MEMBER DUES - CLARK
$40.00
$40.00
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$431.83
$431.83
STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC.
SUPPLIES
$21.09
$21.09
STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY
MISC PLBG SUPPLIES
$96.13
$96.13
TIRE CONNECTIONS INC.
MICE SUPPLIES
$663.15
$663.15
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
PUBLICATION
$15.00
$15.00
WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$201.40
$201,40
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
PARTS
$45.16
PARTS
$216.00
PARTS
$21.40
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
WILLIAMSON NURSERY & ASSOC., I
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PARTS
TRANSPLANT TREE
$11,448.03 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$2,325.89
PAGE 13
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$1.96
$284.52
$365.00
$365.00
***TOTAL**
$20,355.73
********************************************************************************************************
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
MTCE SUPPLIES
$110.20
PARTS
$77.82
$188.02
AMCO INDUSTRIES INC.
MTCE SUPPLIES
$336.37
$336.37
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY
UNIFORM SERVICE
$75.58
UNIFORN SERVICE
$75.59
$151.17
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$14.90
$14.90
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
MTCE CONTRACT
$550.00
$550.00
BADGER METER INC
WATER METER
$1,725.00
$1,725.00
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
SUPPLIES
$72.59
$72. -
CELLULAR ONE
NOV 90 SERVICE
$88.88
CHARTERHOUSE PUBLISHING CO.
SUPPLIES
$22.83
$22.83
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH67-JT-1310-A
$40.59
$40.59
CORRIDOR SUPPLY COMPANY
SNOW FENCE
$75.00
$75.00
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$2,043.70
SERVICES RENDERED
$1,256.30
$3,300.00
E & H UTILITY SALES
MTCE SUPPLIES
$1,244.50
$1,244.50
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
SERVICES
$15.00
$15.00
FINISHMASTER, INC.
SUPPLIES
$30.75
SUPPLIES
$56.54
SUPPLIES
$42.42
$129.71
GATEWAY SUPPLY CO.
MTCE PARTS
$25.80
$25.80
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
MAINTENANCE
$242.66
$242.66
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
IBT, INC.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
J.R.& V. CONSTRUCTION, CO.
WALT JENSEN
KAR PRODUCTS INC
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE
MOTOROLA, INC.
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL -FILM L
NET MIDWEST, INC.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OHM ELECTRONICS
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
METER EXCHANGE
METER EXCHANGE
METER EXCHANGE
MICE SUPPLIES
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICE
SERVICES RENDERED
REIMB - SHOES
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
MATERIAL
PARTS
PARTS
RADIO REPAIRS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SAFETY FILM
NOV - WATER SAMPLE
1818 1/2 BONITA DR
117 N WAVERLY
NS E KENSINGTON/1 E RAND
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
LEGAL NOTICE
LEGAL NOTICE
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
INVOICE AMOUNT
$34.38
$68.76
$34.38
$33.40
$17.87
$24.85
$17.75
$17.96
$1,036.00
$50.00
$244. 18
$31. 39
$2.18
$25.03
$222.50
$55.00
$55.00
$280.70
$55.76
$15.99
$81.00
$150.00
$82.11
$57.55
$54.88
$124.72
$134.03
$91.55
$23.64
$ 20. 00
$20.00
$13.17
$21.48
$38.78
$7.16
$60.00
PAGE 14
TOTAL
$137.52
$33.40
$78.43
$1,036.00
$50.00
$244. 18
$58.60
$222.50
$110.00
$336.46
$15.99
$81.00
$150.00
$319.26
$134.03
$115.19
$40.00
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
POSTMASTER
PROSAFETY
RAINBOW I HR PHOTO EXP.
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
V & G PRINTERS INC.
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER & SEWER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE- APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
SUPPLIES
FILM PROCESSING
FILM PROCESSING
NOV SERVICES
SUPPLIES
MTCE SUPPLIES
PRINTING CHGS - FORMS
PARTS
PARTS
MISC PARTS
MISC PARTS
MTCE SUPPLIES
$17,191.49
PAGE 15
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$1.21
$5.00
$105.00
$23.68
$41.44
$316.92*
$70.36
$19.40
$89.7
$683.16
$683.16*
$552.00
$552.00
$103. 19
$35.19
$138.38
$1,766.49
51,766.49
$480.00
$480.00
$25.13
$25.13
$360.00
$360.00
$25.73
$60.00
$85.73
$84.94
$168.00
$1,055.40
$1,308.34
***TOTAL**
$17,191.49
********************************************************************************************************
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-0498-A $18.48
BH66-JT-3710-A $7.60
BH66-JT-5262-A $118.36
BH66-JT-5266-C $134.49
BH68-JT-7498-A $18.48 $297.41
VENDOR
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
RAND POOL AND PATIO
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
19 E. NORTHWEST HWY
$439.74
PACE 16
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$129.83
$129.83
$12.50
$12.50
***TOTAL**
$439.74
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
DES PLAINES GLASS COMPANY BLDG IMPROVEMENT $1,217.00 $1,217.00
FIRE. AND SECURITY SYSTEMS, INC FD PANEL QTR CHO $69.75 $69.75
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY, IN EQUIPMENT $1,219.47 $1,219.47
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $2,506.22
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND $1,219.47 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $1,286.75
********************************************************************************************************
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BG21-JT-1838-A $50 96
BH67-JT-3858-B
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND $58.86
$7.90 $58.86
***TOTAL** $58.86
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
CORPORATE PURPOSES B 6 I 1973
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 12/27/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
BOND PMT FEES
$400.00
INVOICE AMOUNT
$400.00
***TOTAL**
PAGE 17
TOTAL
$400.00
$400.00
$724,942.16
DATE RUN 12/27/90
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TIME RUN 14.23.26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING
SUMMARY BY FUND 12/27/90
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$464,459.49
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$6,581.81
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$23,159.85
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$9,862.51
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$44,699.00
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$1,410.72
48
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND
$1,219.47
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$63,515.42
51
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND
$3,862.64
60
CORPORATE PURPOSES B & 11973
$400.00
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$39,548.81
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$41,634.19
73
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$6,000.00
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$13,588.25
TOTAL
ALL FUNDS
$724,942.16
PACE 18
ID-APPBAR
12/7/90
/caf 12/26/90
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 ENTITLED
"PUBLIC PASSENGER VEHICLES" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 11.1134 of Article XI entitled "Public
Passenger Vehicles" of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby amended by deleting said section
11.1134 in its entirety and substituting the following; so that
hereinafter said Section 11.1134 shall be and read as follows:
it Sec. 11.1134. Schedule of Established Rates of Fare and
Charges.
No owner or driver of a taxicab shall charge greater sum for
the use of a taxicab than in accordance with the following
rates:
A. Two dollars ($2.00) for any distance less than one
mile for one passenger.
B. Two dollars and forty cents ($2.40) for the first
mile for one passenger.
C. Fourteen cents ($0.14) for each additional one-tenth
(1/10) mile or fraction thereof over and above the
first mile for one passenger.
D. Ten cents ($0.10) for each twenty (20) seconds
waiting time or traffic delay.
E. Ten cents ($0.10) for each additional passenger
above the age of twelve (12) years for the entire
trip.
F. Twenty-five cents ($0.25) service charge is added
to the above rates for parcel delivery and the
handling of all items other than normal luggage.
G. Fifty cents ($0.50) service charge is added to the
above rates for all trips which do not originate or
terminate within the Village.
H. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary
contained herein, an owner of a taxicab may
establish flat rates for trips which originate
within the Village with a destination point outside
of the Village or trips which originate outside of
the Village with a destination point within the
Village. Any such flat rates established shall be
filed with the Village Clerk. 11
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
Chapter 11
Page 2 of 2
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the
manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1991.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM
FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE
BALLOT FOR THE PHIL 2. 1991 ELECTION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That pursuant to the authority vested in the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
by Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, 1970,
an advisory referendum shall be held in the Village of Mount
Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, during the general election to be
held April 2, 1991, for the purpose of submitting to the voters
the following proposition:
Shall the Corporate Authorities of the village of Mount
Prospect authorize the construction of a new Fire and Police
Building at a cost of ? "
SECTION TWO: That the local election official shall certify the
above public question to the election authority having jurisdiction
over the territory of the Village of Mount Prospect in the manner
provided by law.
SECTION THREE: That Notice of said election shall be published and
the form of the ballot shall be prepared in the form and manner
provided by law.
SECTION FOUR: That said advisory referendum regarding said public
question and all matters pertaining thereto shall be conducted in
the manner prescribed by statute for and during the aforesaid
general election.
SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of I
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL
BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1,
1990 TO APRIL 30, 1991
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have passed and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the
Village under the "Budget Officer System"' and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of
Illinois an annual budget for the fiscal year commencing May 1, 1990 to
April 30, 1991 was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 4175 approved
by the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect on April 17, 1990;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for fiscal
1990/91; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
believe the changes, as specified on the attached 1990/91 budget amendment
pages, to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the fiscal year 1990/91 budget for the Village of Mount
Prospect is hereby amended, as detailed on Schedule "A" attached hereto.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1 1991
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
C
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER fv"�
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
DECEMBER 18, 1990
SUBJECT:
ZBA-93-SU-90, TERENCE E. FREDIANI
LOCATION:
2218 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD (ROSENOW INDUSTRIAL PARK)
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a request for an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 filed by Terence Frediani.
The application was filed to allow a car wash in Roienow Industrial Planned Unit
Development and to allow a front yard setback of 10 feet rather than the 30 foot front yard
established for the P.U.D.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At the
meeting, Mr. Frediani presented testimony in support of the request. He described the
proposed facility stating that this was intended to be the "flag ship" for the franchise. As
such, great attention would be given to the exterior design and landscaping.
Rich Spedoni, Spot -Not franchise manager, explained that the typical franchise hours of
operation are from 8:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily, but they would prefer to be open 24 hours
at this location. The facility would be manned from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. He further
discussed the typical customer volume, peak hours, and price structure of services offered.
Tom Coutre, owner/operator of National Pride Car Wash, 2000 South Elmhurst Road,
expressed concern about the need for another car wash in the area. He felt that another
car wash in the area would adversely affect his and other auto -oriented businesses in the
area. Tom Kropika, owner/operator of Tom's Auto Body, 2000 South Elmhrust Road
expressed similar concerns.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that staff has some concerns with the proposal relative
to traffic impacts and site constraints. However, staffs primary concern is that a car wash
is not consistent with the original intent to develop the P.U.D. with small lot industrial uses.
While staff prefers an industrial use on this lot, the proposed car wash is generally
compatible with the mixed use character of South Busse Road.
The Zoning Board discussed the request deliberating over the issue of the market feasibility.
The majority of members felt that the Zoning Code is not intended to shelter or protect
individual businesses. In addition, the proposed use is less obnoxious and intense than other
uses permitted in the 1-1 Zoning District. It is also compatible with existing surrounding
development.
Accordingly, by a 5-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the request to amend Special Use Ordinance #4180 to allow a car wash and
10 foot front yard setback on Lot #5 in the Rosenow Industrial P.U.D.
}
LAA(fhRartb `IELt�t 4py
F
C
-a A Iry �rt{e F 1att11 OITRMTgy RIIfR . s„t i`:di
h
#
wir. :
3�
EY
�f�
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 93 -SU -90
Hearing Date: December 13, 1990
PETITIONER:
Terence E. Frediani
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
2218 S. Busse Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
November 27, 1990
REQUEST:
An amendment to Special Use
Ordinance #4180 to allow a car
wash in the Rosenow Industrial
Planned Unit Development. The
proposed development will also
require an amendment to the
setback requirements established
for the P.U.D. to allow a 10'
front yard rather than the 30'
front yard required.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Thomas Coutre, 2000 S. Elmhurst
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner
is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 to
allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit
Development. The proposed development will also require an
amendment to the setback requirements established for the
P.U.D. to allow a 10' front yard rather than the 30' front
yard required.
The petitioner, Terence Frediani, 1705 Frediani Ct.,
presented his case stating that he would like to open a car
wash at 2218 S. Busse Rd. Mr. Frediani continued by stating
he has been in the Village of Mount Prospect for 37 years
and would like to keep his business here. Mr. Frediani stated
that the Special Use would be for a small driveway located on
the east side of the proposed property. Mr. Frediani also
stated that the site would be very open with visually
pleasing and extensive landscaping. Mr. Frediani then noted
that the building height would be well under the requirement
for the Village. Mr. Frediani stated that the proposed car
wash would
ZBA-93-SU-90
December 13, 1990
Page 2 of 3
be a positive and useful service and would be upgrading for
the surrounding area.
Mr. Rich Spidoni, of Spot -Not Franchise, stated that there
are 22 existing Spot -Not -Car Washes in the area, the closest
in Tinley Park. Mr. Spidoni also stated that the nearest car
wash is about a I mile from the proposed car wash. Mr.
Spidoni stated that the peak hours would be on the weekends
and afterwork between 5 o'clock and 7 o'clock. Mr. Lannon
questioned the hours of the car wash. Mr. Spidoni stated that
the hours would be from 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. but they
would like this to be a 24 hour car wash. Mr. Spidoni also
stated that the proposed building would not be facing Busse
Rd. and would have stacking space for 35 cars. Chairman
Basnik questioned how many cars a day they expect.
Mr. Spidoni estimates 80 cars a day which would be about 500
a week.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
noted that there would be 8 serving bays and this would be a
self serve type of car wash. Miss Farnham stated the staff
has concerns with traffic conflict. Miss Farnham noted the
car wash was not with the initial P.U.D. plan to develop
small lot industrial uses. Mrs. Skowron asked if cars would
start stacking up on Busse Road. Miss Farnham stated they
would probably stack on the access road before overflowing
onto Busse Road. Mr. Cassidy asked if any other developments
are on the property? Miss Farnham stated that J&L Warehouse
is the only other building there now, but at least one other
proposal is currently in the planning stages.
Thomas Coutre, National Pride Car Wash, 2200 S. Elmhurst Rd.,
stated concerns for the proposed car wash. Mr. Coutre stated
that he has owned the National Pride car wash since 1986 and
feel the Village of Mount Prospect does not need another car
wash. Mr. Coutre feels he will experience personal economic
loss noting that there are 11 car washes an Elmhurst Road and
within a 1 mile radius of his car wash. Mr. Coutre presented
a chart showing the expected dollar losses he might incur
if another car wash went in. Mr. Coutre stated he is totally
against the proposed car wash.
Tom Cropika, Tom's Auto Body, Mt. Prospect, stated that he
gets a lot of business from the National Pride Car Wash
owned by Mr. Coutre, and any change in business for the car
wash would directly impact him.
Mr. Frediani stated that National Car Wash is 1.6 miles from
his proposed car wash. He is going into the business for
ZBA-93-SU-90
December 13, 1990
Page 3 of 3
profit and feels the competition factor irrelevant to his
case. Mr. Spidoni noted that the Spot -Not Franchise relies on
advertisement and market evalutation.
The Board then generally discussed the case. The Board
discussed Mr. Coutre's concerns about market saturation and
competition. Mr. Lannon stated that the Zoning Ordinance
should not be used to shelter or protect businesses from free
market competition. Chairman Basnik disagreed, stating that
zoning has a direct impact on the market. He felt that in
this situation, since the property is zoned 1-1 and the
P.U.D. was originally intended for I-1 uses, a commercial use
would not be appropriate. Mr. Lannon stated that the primary
issue relates to the appropriateness of the use in this
location, not its market feasibility. Mr. Brettrager stated
that this use is not offensive to the area and feels it would
be beneficial for the people who live in apartments just to
the north of the proposed area. Mr. Cassidy agreed with Mr.
Brettrager. Chairman Basnik questioned if the Village needs
another Car wash. Mr. Lannon stated it would not adversely
affect the area.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for an amendment to Special Use # 4180 to
allow a car wash in the Rosenow Industrial Planned Unit
Development.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron
NAYS: Basnik
Motion carried by a vote of 5-1.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECk
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN wl-
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: DECEMBER 3, 1990
CASE NO.: ZBA-93-SU-90
APPLICANT: TERENCE E. FREDIANI
ADDRESS: 2218 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD (ROSENOW INDUSTRIAL PARK)
LOCATION MAP:
4-
z
R&C'
...... ...
R
L
F
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: 1-1 (Light Industrial)
LOT SIZE: 49,630 st (1.14 Acres) = 13.9% of total PUD
% COVERAGE: 49.5%
F -A -R.: N/A
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
The applicant is requesting an amendment to Special Use Ordinance #4180 to allow a car
wash in the Rosenow industrial Planned Unit Development. The proposed development
will also require an amendment to the setback requirements established for the P.U.D. to
allow a 10 foot front yard rather than the 30 foot front yard required.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a car wash on Lot 5 in the
Rosenow Industrial Park. Because car washes are not a permitted use in the I-1 District,
the P.U.D. must be amended to allow this use. The Zoning Ordinance under Section
14.2503.B allows the Zoning Board of Appeals to recommend authorizing uses within the
Planned Unit Developments that otherwise are not allowed under the use regulations of the
corresponding zoning district, if the proposed use satisfactorily meets the Special Use
standards listed in the Ordinance.
The car wash will consist of eight drive-thru service bays and four vacuum islands. Stacking
for 3-5 cars will be provided for each bay. In addition, four on-site parking spaces will be
provided for employee and customer use.
A front yard variance is requested to accommodate a drive accessing the two eastern -most
bays. The drive encroaches into the 30 foot front yard setback. A 10 foot landscaped strip
will remain.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The Industrial Park contains five
lots, only one of which is currently developed. The car wash will be located, on Lot #5
which is the lot closest to Busse Road. J & L Warehouse occupies the lot directly north
of the proposed car wash. A proposal is currently in the planning stages for another
warehouse facility at the end of the cul-de-sac. The property directly to the south is zoned
R -X. Given its location between the Industrial Park and the I-90 Expressway, it is unlikely
that it will be developed for residential use.
The Zoning Ordinance does not permit car washes in I-1 Zoning Districts. However, the
use is no more obnoxious than other uses permitted under I-1 Zoning. The proposed site
plan includes a significant amount of landscaping, especially along the road accessing the
entire PUD.
The proposed use is more commercial in nature than other uses permitted in the I-1
District. Consequently, it might generate more short-term (customer) traffic than the other
uses in the PUD. It is likely however, that peak customer volume will occur on weekends
when other industrial/warehouse uses typically do not generate traffic. The applicant should
discuss the anticipated traffic volume that the car wash will generate.
Except for some concerns about potential traffic conflicts, staff does not feel this use is
incompatible with the character of the Industrial Park. However, this industrial PUD was
only recently approved, and done so based on testimony from the owner that the five -lot
industrial park was being created to meet an existing market condition for small industrial
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
lots. The proposed car wash is a move away from the original design of the industrial park.
This type of small industrial development is desirable because it crates an area where
similar uses can locate, expanding the industrial and employment base of the Village. A
service use, such as a car wash, may not be inappropriate, but its location reduces industrial
opportunity. The property owner should provide testimony as to his marketing plans for the
remaining lots, and the advantages of locating a car wash in the industrial park.
Staff notes that on-site detention may have to be modified as a result of this plan. The
engineering plans for the entire five -lot industrial subdivision indicate that the northern 66
feet of this lot are part of a shared detention area. In this area, the finished grade elevation
cannot exceed 680.8 feet. The landscaped berms may have to be eliminated to
accommodate required detention capacity. Another option might be to grade the paved
area appropriately to expand the detention area to the south... essentially transferring the
detention capacity of the bermed areas to another location. However, these issues must be
resolved in the detail site design stage and do not have a direct bearing on the proposed
amendments.
16111.6# IbIl Dia Ike
Other staff comments relate to issues that must be addressed in the detail site design.
"nese include:
-The site grading must accommodate the required detention as previously noted.
-The development of this lot (#5) and the adjacent lot (#4) will require the extension
of a 12" watermain through both lots to connect to a main in Busse Road.
-Some proposed hydrant locations may require relocation as determined by the Fire
Prevention Bureau.
Staff believes that an industrial user would be better for this lot, but does not find the car
wash objectionable considering the character of South Busse Road. The applicant should
demonstrate that the proposed use meets the Special Use standards, particularly the
anticipated traffic volume the car wash will generate. As stated earlier, the property owner
should discuss his marketing plan for the remaining industrial lots, and any advantages the
car wash provides.
Staff also notes that the detail site design may result in modifications to the present site
plan. However, these modifications do not have a direct bearing on the requested
amendment and the final site and landscaping plans must be approved by staff.
DMC:hg
INDUSTRIAL
Mims
Suppior1%1
A Kennametal Company
December 26, 1990
Zoning Board
Village of Mt. Prospect
Attn: Carol Sields
Re: Car Wash
2218 S. Busse Hwy.
Mt. Prospect, IL.
Case No. ZBA-93-SU-90
We are very concerned with the usage being proposed in the
aforementioned proceeding.
When we constructed our building at 2220 South Busse, we had to put
in a $35,000 additional booster pump so we could have enough water
pressure in case of a fire at our building. Being that we are at
the end of the pipe line, we can tell what day the water tower is
full and when it is empty. I would be very unhappy if our building
caught fire and we didn't have enough water to put it out because
someone was washing cars across the street.
I have checked on the car wash business and I found it would take
600 cars per day on a clear day to make this a feasible venture. I
would like to remind you that the driveway is merely a driveway not
a street capable of handling 500 to 1,000 cars per day. There is
a lot of traffic on Busse now. During certain hours it is difficult
to exit our property. Across from our driveway is a huge tank yard
and those trucks are coming in and out all day. We already have a
potential accident at this intersection.
I certainly suggest that before you rezone this property that a
study of the traffic pattern be done to make sure we are not
overloading the existing property.
Also, I'm concerned that this could become a hang out for young
people who have no where else to go. We already have an existing
problem with young people at the apartments north of us. They seem"
to think our building is good for target practice and dumping
garbage.
Whereas, I think there should be something on that property, I'm
concerned with what business you are proposing to put there. I
would like to see a study done on the traffic problem, the driveway
problem, and the water problem before we give a rubber stamp to
whatever proposal hits the table.
urs tru
Vel H Shapiro,
resident
JHS/Qjl
P.O. Box 40625 — 19339 Glenmore, Detroit, Michigan 48240-1493 — (313) 532.8700 -- FAX: 313-5$4-8581
GORDON & GLICKSON PC.
A Pwkmhbral Cowmion of Attorneys at Low
444 North Mich1pri Avenue
Robert C. Dalicy
L*rcc T. )once
YXh Ploor, ChiCW, Winc* 60611
Alan R. Sorlack
Thomas P. Lamont
3121321.1700
Gregory ), Ovechc
Terence J. McKenna
Telecopier: 312/321-9324
Ckinent J. 0trioll, Jr.
Sarah K. Nsdcllioft
Rktxd L. Foad
Jean Made R. Pechette
600 South Second Strcci
PrAnqobe Grbcrt
Dank!L Skgftd
suite wo, spanodd, ftwis 627o4
"t L. oil&"
Cieotw N. GofdDn
Stan Iscatth
=kvo M. Stein
217t7WI040
Mark L. cox"
ivneb Lor SicLunt
TekieopJ"! 217/789.1077
Eric G. Gnmumi
Wthes-'s Dimet DAd Nam4,w
(312) 321-7656 December 28, 1990
Mr. John Fulton Dixon'
Village Manager
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street!
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Re: ZBA-93-6U-90
Terrence Frddi4ni/Proposed Car Wash at
2218 South tussle Road (Rosenow Industrial Park)
QMr rile No. 41) 7 q::&O
Dear Mr. Dixon:
Enclosed is a letter for submittal to the village Board members
along with the packet of information you are preparing for the
January 2, 1991 meeting.: Please copy and distribute this letter to
each member.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Very truly yours,
GORDO & Gj P
h K. N e hoffe-%
SKN/dlg
Enclosure
GORDON & GLICKSON PC
444 N40rth Michivin Avenue
36th Floor, CbkW, fty4i 60611
312/521.1700
Telecopier: 312/321-9324
600 South Second Strect
Suite 100, SpringActu, UMKwIb 62704
Tc1ecopler; 217/789-I077
Wri"r'i Direct DW Nmber
(312) 321-7654
A FWOSUOV 00Wmilon of Attombp 61 L*W
Robert C. Bailey
lAnce T. lorv--
Alan R. bodick
7bi)Mas R. Lamont
GrC001Y1. Ducchc
Terrance J. McKcnn2
OMOM J- Caron, Jr.
Sarah K. 1`+Adr1h111Trr
klehard L. Faget
Jean MuteR. Pechcue
rrA1NXPW- Gal"n
D2rdeI L. Skgftkd
Scat L. 011cluAin
Stuart Smith
George N. Gordon
Ulftxd M. swill
Muir L. Gordon
James Ike StetwM
Pric G. Grossman
December 28, 1990
Village Board Members,
Village Of Mt. Prospect
100 South Emerson Street'
Mt- Prospect, IL 60016
Re'. ZBA-93-SU-90:
Terrence Fredi4ni/proposed Car Wash at
2218 South Buse Road (Rosenow Industrial Park)
376-01
Dear Board Members:
This office represents certain operators in the Auto service
Mall located at 2000 South Elmhurst Road in mt. Prospect,
been requested to set. and have
forth certain objections to the request to
amend Special Use ordin"ce 14180 to allow a car wash in the Rosenow
Industrial Planned Unit Development. The objections raised are as
follows:
1. 'The ZBA 1*11VAA P -n tA—MMt—the -S-8—SER—ested relief
The applicant requested the Mt. Prospect Zoning Board of
Appeals (ZBA) to vary'th4 front yard setback of the proposed
development from the req4ired 30 feet to 10 feet. The ZBA did not
have Jurisdiction to grant this relief for two reasons. First, this
request was not included4n the public notice for the bearing as
required by Village ordinance at Section 14.703.B.I.C. Since this
relief was not properly noticed, the ZBA has no Jurisdiction to
grant the setback variation.
Second, the ZBA lac4* jurisdiction to grant the front yard
setback reduction because it exceeds the 10 percent authorization
got forth in the Villag �
e�Ordinance at Seotio
n 14.2503.A.11:
GORDON & GLICKSON P.C.
Village Board Members',
December 28, 1990
Page 2
The front yardt.6may not exceed the percentage allowed in
the Zoning District in which the P.U.D. is located [I -I]
by more than 10 percent of the standard.
(Emphadis added).
The applicant has asked to reduce the required 30 foot standard by
66 percent. See Zoning ordinance at 14.2202.A. The ZBA has only
that authority which is granted by the Zoning ordinance. The ZBAIS
grant of a 66 percent front yard variation exceeds its authority and
is therefore void. Aqaotdingly, the site plan approved by the ZBA
is defective. It must be amended by the applicant and reconsidered
by the ZBA before the Village Board may consider this application.
2. The applicant failed to meet the required special use
s&andlrds under the.Zoning
__QrdimgA9e at Section 14, LM,fg) ,
It the Board does consider the applicant's case -in -chief, it
must deny the application because the applicant failed to meet the
required special use standards to allow a car wash on property zoned
1-1 P.U.D. The Ordinance requires at section 14.2503(8) that the
applicant present evidence to establish certain standards. The
applicant failed to satisfy this burden in the following instances:
(a) The applicant failed to show that the oar wash
use was necessary or desirable and was
appropriate with respect to the primary purpose
of the.Indlustrial Park development. (See
)(1) -
The Village's Comprehensive Plan clearly requires the
development of the subject property with industrial uses. Indeed,
the Village only approved, the I-1 P.D.D. last February. The purpose
of a planned developmentIs to permit development in harmony with
the Comprehensive Plan. A= ordinance at S14.2501. The development
of a car wash on thisproperty is in opposition to the Comprehensive
Plan and the purpose of the planned development. The comprehensive
Plan further recommends that commercial activities, such as the
applicant's proposed use in this area, should be phased out.
GORDON & GLICKSON P.C.
Village Board Members'
December 28, 1990
Page 3
At the public hearihg before the ZBA, the applicant did not
demonstrate a need for the proposed car wash. In fact, the
testimony was to the contrary since there are 10 existing car washes
in the Immediate area Further, the applicant did not comply with
the Planning Department's recommendation and provide a traffic plan
for the development. :This is one of the required standards for a
planned development. "e Ordinance at Section 14.2503(A)(9).
The recent zoning of this property to the I -I P.U.D.
classification, the dIctates of the Comprehensive Plan, and the
Planning Department1s:red6mmendations all show that the use of this
property as a car wash is not necessary or appropriate.
(b) The car wash is of such a nature and is 00
located as to exercise a detrimental influence
on the sukroundin n"i _bbqr_hoodt 514,2503(r)(2)
The amount of traffic generated by this Use would adversely
impact the surrounding neighborhood. For example, such traffic
could conflict with tanker trucks exiting from the petroleum tank
farm across Busse Road from the proposed use. Busse Road is
believed to be the location of frequent automobile accidents in the
Village. While more needs to be investigated relative to traffic
impacts, clearly the 200!or more families at the "Pharoahr.11
apartment complex to the.north of the proposed use also utilize the
same roadway network tor'ingress and egress. The increased traffic
impact and potential for accidents is apparent. At a continued
hearing, traffic safety experts would be available to develop this
point and answer question s.
Further evidence of a detrimental impact on the neighborhood is
the potential drain on the water supply in this area. This property
is located at the end'ofthe loop for the Village watermain. We are
told that an adjacent use;, the Jr&L Warehouse, was required by its
insurer to include a "booster pump" to double the water pressure
provided at the watermain. The proposed use may deplete an already
limited water system,thus indirectly causing a potential hazard for
the surrounding residd.nts, and businesses.
Moreover, positioning the proposed use in an area where there
are no other commercial 24-hour establishments, may encourage
vandalism, vagrancy and other illegal activities.
GORDON & GLICKSON PC.
Village Board Members,
December 28, 1990
Page 4
(0) Tice oar welsh, Which is not a permitted use under
the use rigulations of the 1-1 district, does
not meet the performance standards of the
9
i ning
The applicant also made no showing that the proposed use met
the performance standards of the applicable zoning district. For
example, the applicant failed to address the level of noise which
would be generated by the vaccum cleaners at the proposed use.
Thus, as a matter of law,this required standard was not met.
By its authority,; the Village Board may remand this application
to the Z5A for further evidence or investigation on these points.
We would be pleased on behalf of our client to present this
evidence. For these reasons, we request that this matter be
remanded to the ZBA for f ' urther consideration. In the alternative,
this application should be denied for lack of jurisdiction and
failure to meet the required standards.
Res6ectfully s mi ted,
S fO d M. Steri
Sms/dlg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990
SUBJECT: ZBA-94-SU-90, ZBA-95-V-90, YUN WOOK YI
LOCATION: 812 SOUTH DEBORAH LANE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for a Special Use permit and variance filed by Yun Wook Yi. The
application was filed to allow construction of a three -car garage and a 34 foot wide driveway
at 812 South Deborah Lane. The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires Special Use
permits for three -car garages and allows driveway widths up to 21 feet.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At the
meeting, Mr. Yun presented testimony in support of the request. No objectors were present
in the audience.
Julie Farnham, Planner, explained that three -car garages are a common feature of newer,
large single family homes in the surrounding neighborhood. She also noted that this lot is
substantially larger than the minimum standard, and all proposed setbacks meet or exceed
Code requirements.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting the large size of lot and ample
setbacks.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the request for a Special Use Permit and variance to allow a three -car
garage and 34 foot wide driveway at 812 South Deborah Lane.
NEW
A
VIE- American Survey CO.
913 Hcii.,y Gr-- I C, It, 60013 108-516-2700
of
E
J>1111 PAR", Of
OF l')t 0,
�Ws Q� M,
'.11A
rk9EiA LO 7 NAN, 41N� .,X, -P %;t, ,,)A
�OVN�C? Ni 14 1 01
DEBORAH LN-
-Y"
%
State of Ill"M
ome, 0 County of McHenry
Land
C,deleo by ate0 the
1, William M TeriBUSCM. W Reg'St"e"
S�,Veyol, do hereby Ceillty 'bat I na'e
Plop awess 10k shown Wldllgs as of In` oay --
oi
0,slaI ae 9— in feel and Reglmeretl —L,
Staveyd 276Y
01i Pans Tw.01
inoilwes tgtt slake to"no set. 1. deed M title PO' Cy to any, b.'" lines I
ton Blake so No Wral
inckw*5 W -kV
Stale of Illinois ) ,
County of MCHeM) --
wats. M TWIBUSCZ, W MM's Regswei: L04
00 heleot, Candy UW I new %0 n" "
.sem 0asC:rbsU plop" W4 mial "a Plat is it oolleo
Ispeser"wol sasasawy Aso' VMS
Reg'swed Lam Sw"YIX # 2767
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 94 -SU -90 Hearing Date: December 13, 1990
95-V-90
PETITIONER: Yun Wook Yi
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 812 South Deborah Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: November 27, 1990
REQUEST: Special Use Permit to allow a
three -car garage per Section
14.1101.C.6. Also, a variation
from Section 14.3016.3 to allow
a 34' wide driveway.
ZBA MEMBER PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petioner is requestin a Special Use permit to allow
construation of a three -car garage. Concurrently a variation
is requested to Section 14.3016.3 to allow a 34' wide
driveway rather than the permitted 21' width.
The Petioner , Yun Wook Yi, 812 S. Deborah Ln. stated he
would like to construct a three -car garage and 34' driveway
on the proposed home he would like to construct.
Julie Farnham, Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the petitoners request for the construction of a
three -car garage meet all setbacks, building height, lot
coverage and F.A.R. Miss Farnham stated that the proposed
home is larger than the surrounding homes on Deborah Lane
but the character matches many recently built on nearby
Kennicott Ct. Miss Farnham also stated that the petitioner
will reduce the driveway to 211 at the street and will be
responsible for repairs on the driveway due to utility work
if required in the easements.
The Board generally discussed the case and had no objections.
ZBA-94-SU-90
ZBAc-95-V-90
December 13, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Chairman Basnik then: entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a Special Use permit to allow
construction of a three -car garage.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a`motion to grant the
petitioners request for a variation from Section 14.3016.3 to
allow a 34' wide driveway.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Cassidy seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Skowron,Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This case must still be heard 'before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN 160C.,
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE:
DECEMBER 7, 1990
CASE NO.:
ZBA-94-SU-90, ZBA-95-V-90
APPLICANT:
YUN WOOK Y1
ADDRESS:
812 SOUTH DEBORAH LANE
LOCATION MAP:
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
ZONING: R-1 (Single Family Residential)
LOT SIZE: 18,045 st (137.751 x 1311)
% COVERAGE: 43.6%
F.A-R.: 0.30
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 2
ffK$1Tfi*T1
The applicant is requesting a Special Use Permit to allow construction of a three -car garage
per Section 14.1101,0.6. Concurrently, a variation is requested to Section 14.3016.3 to allow
a 34 foot wide driveway rather than the permitted 21 foot width.
Staff notes that the applicant also requested a variation to allow a Floor Area Ratio
(FAR.) of 0.37 rather than the 0.35 allowed. The 0.37 FAR. was calculated based on the
gross house dimensions shown on the site plan.. Upon receipt of detailed building plans, the
FAR. was recalculated using precise dimensions. The FAR. is actually 0.33, which is
within the Code limitation and does not require a variation.
Summary of application: The applicant is proposing to construct a large single family house
with an attached three -car garage at 812 S. Deborah Lane. The garage will be accessed by
a driveway that widens to 34 feet in front of the three garage doors. All proposed setbacks
meet or exceed Village Code requirements. The building height is also within the 28 foot
height limitation for single family residential houses.
Surrounding Area Development and Potential Impact: The immediate neighborhood along
Deborah Lane is characterized by moderate-sized single family homes. However, new
developments of larger homes with three -car garages have occurred on Kennicott Court and
more recently have been proposed for the adjacent Par 4 Subdivision. While three -car
garages may not be the norm on Deborah Lane, they are fairly common in the immediate
vicinity.
A 15 foot utility easement exists along the entire east property line. The utilities in the
easement will serve this lot and the one directly to the south. As proposed, the driveway
will be constructed within the easement. The applicant should be aware that in the event
work is required in the easement, repairs to the driveway are the property owner's
responsibility.
The site plan also indicates that the driveway approach flares out to match the 30 foot width
of an existing opening onto Deborah Lane. This additional paving is not necessary for
automobile maneuvering. Staff suggests that the driveway be a maximum width of 21 feet
where it opens onto Deborah Lane. This will minimize the potential for the driveway to be
misconstrued as an extension of the street. It will also reduce the total paved area on the
lot by 150 square feet or 1%.
Most comments by other staff members relate to the construction of utilities and lot grading.
Both Engineering and :Inspection Services request that the driveway be a maximum 21 feet
where it abuts the street. They also suggest that the 30 foot wide pavement stub at the
south end of the cul-de-sac be removed and the bulb be completed with curb and gutter.
Utility and grading plans must be submitted with the building plan set.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 3
The proposed house is very large, as indicated by the lot coverage and F.A.R. being only
slightly below the maximum amounts allowed by Village Code. While it is substantially
larger than other homes on Deborah Lane, it is also on a much larger lot. The lot is at the
end of the cul-de-sac and the house will be set 40 feet back from the street. Staff notes that
this house is similar in character and size to homes built or proposed in adjacent
subdivisions. Three -car garages are becoming common features of these large houses,
likewise, most over -sized garages require driveways wider than 21 feet.
Staff does not have any major objections to this request, but suggests that approval of this
request be conditioned on reducing the driveway width to 21 feet where it connects to
Deborah Lane.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: DECEMBER 18, 1990
SUBJECT: ZBA-96-A-90, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits, for your consideration, their recommendation on
three amendments to the Zoning Ordinance as follows:
1. Amend Section 14.503.B. to change the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time from
8:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
2. Amend the existing regulations for home occupations in all residential districts, and
add standards to allow home occupations in residential districts subject to certain
performance standards, and appropriate definition in Section 14.2602.
3. Amend Section 14.101.G to clarify the interpretation of lot consolidations, and add
a definition of "zoning lot" to Section 14.2602.
The Zoning Board considered the amendments at their meeting of December 13, 1990. At
the meeting, David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, explained the purpose of
the proposed amendments as follows:
Amendment 1
An earlier meeting time would allow the Zoning Board to handle more business at
the regular meetings and potentially avoid special meetings during busy months. It
would also reflect recent practice of the Zoning Board.
This would establish performance standards to regulate home occupations that
currently occur inconspicuously since the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance does not
allow them outright. Staff feels that many home-based businesses are compatible in
residential zoning districts provided they meet certain performance standards relative
to number of employees; signage display; noise; outside storage; traffic generation,
and other factors which could impact the neighborhood. Staff feels that measuring
the appropriateness of a business based on its impact is preferable to developing an
exhaustive list of permitted/excluded home occupations.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
Under current regulations, when physical improvements, such as a room addition, are
proposed on property consisting of more than one lot, but under single ownership,
the owner must consolidate the lots in order to get a building permit. This situation
usually occurs when two older, narrow lots have been developed as a single unit.
Staff does not feel that there is a public benefit to requiring lot consolidation in many
of these situations. The Plan Commission agrees that many lot consolidations are
unnecessary except in cases where easements or street dedications are required.
The proposed definition of "zoning lot" would recognize single tracts of land as
buildable units for zoning purposes (setbacks, number of buildings on a lot, etc.). A
zoning lot would not necessarily coincide exactly with one lot of record.
Also at the meeting, Janet Hansen of the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce, stated
support for Amendment 2 but suggested that one employee (non -family) be allowed for each
home occupation, rather than staffs suggestion that no, non -family members be employed
in home occupations. Tom McGovern of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission presented
testimony in favor of Amendment 3.
The Zoning Board discussed each amendment separately. They generally agreed that the
amendments, as proposed, should be approved, but suggested some changes to the home
occupation performance standards listed in the staff memo.
Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board
approved the three proposed amendments to the Zoning Ordinance to include the following
changes to the performance standards for home occupations as proposed by staff:
1. Delete Item #3: "No mechanical or electrical equipment shall be used or stored,
except such as permissible for domestic or household purposes."
2. To allow one non -family employee at a time, rather than a prohibition on any
employees.
DMC:hg 0
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 96-A-90
Hearing Date: December 13, 1990
PETITIONER:
Village of Mount Prospect
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
100 South Emerson
PUBLICATION DATE:
November 27, 1990
REQUEST:
Amend Section 14.503.B. to
change the Zoning Board of
Appeals meeting time from 8:00
p.m. to 7:30 p.m. Amend the
existing regulations for home
occupations in all residential
districts, and add standards to
allow home occupations in
residential districts subject to
certain performance standards,
and appropriate definition in
Section 14.2602. Amend Section
14.101.G to clarify the
interpretation of lot
consolidations, and add a
definition of "zoning lot" to
Section 14.2602.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
Micheale Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED
PARTIES: Margaret Gaweke, 416 S. Mt.
Prospect Road. Janet
Hansen, Chamber of Commerce.
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting amendments to the Zoning Ordinance.
1. Amend Section 14.503.B to change the Zoning Board of
Appeals meeting time from 8:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
2. Amend the existing regulations for home occupations
in all residential districts, and add standards to
allow home occupations in residential districts
subject to certain performance standards, and
appropriate definition in Section 14.2602.2
3. Amend Section 14.101.G to clarify the interpretation
of lot consolidations, and add a definition of
"zoning lot" to Section 14.2602.
ZBA-96-A-90
December 13, 1990
Page 2 of 3
The petitioner, David Clements, Director of Planning and
Zoning, presented the case stating that the first request has
to be formally changed in the Zoning ordinance, to reflect
the current meeting time.
Mr. Clements stated that the second request is to allow home
businesses in certain situations, noting that the Planning
and Zoning department receives many calls regarding this and
they must tell them this is not allowed. He noted that in the
community a wide range of inconspicuous home businesses
exist, many of which have Illinois revenue numbers. Home
based businesses vary from contractor's offices, part-time
caterers, artist studios, to computer consultants Staff
typically becomes aware of home occupation if it is one that
disturbs neighbors. Theses matters are investigated on a
complaint basis. It would be appropriate to amend the Zoning
Ordinance to allow home occupations, if the home-based
business met certain standards. For example, a home
occupation should have no employees, display no sign, nor
have any retail sales on premise. Also, no home occupation
should include storage of supplies or inventory. Many
communities regulate home occupations based on such
performance standards, and this would be a reasonable
approach for Mount Prospect to consider.
Mr. Clements then introduced Mrs Janet Hansen, executive
director with the Chamber of Mount Prospect. Mrs. Hansen
stated that the Chamber of commerce had voted in favor of
allowing home businesses in the Village of Mount Prospect and
presented the Board with facts founded by the Chamber of
Commerce. The Board then reviewed the comments made by the
Chamber of Commerce. They also separately considered the
standards presented in the staff memo.
Mr. Clements stated that amendment * 3 and the definition of
11 zoninglot" would allow existing properties consisting of
more than one lot, under single ownership, to be considered
as a single buildable unit for zoning and building permit
purposes. Under current regulations, when physical
improvements, such as a room addition, are proposed on
property consisting of more than one lot, but under single
ownership, the owner must consolidate the lots in order to
get a building permit. This situation usually occurs when two
older, narrow lots have been developed as a single unit.
Staff does not feel that there is a public benefit to
requiring lot consolidations in many of theses situations.
Tom McGovern of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission stated
that the Plan Commission agrees with staffs proposal and
feels that many lot consolidations are unnecessary except in
ZBA-96-A-90
December 13, 1990
Page 3 of 3
cases where easements or street dedications are required.
The Board then generally discussed the amendments noting that
for amendment number 2 they make the following changes to the
standards listed in the memo from staff:
1. Delete item #3 pertaining to mechanical and
electrical equipment. They felt item # 4 would
cover any problems associated with the use of such
equipment.
2. Change item # 6 to allow on non -family member
employee at one time rather than no non -family
employees as suggested by staff.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request with the changes to Amendment 2 as
discussed.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon,. Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN IDrVC--
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1990
SUBJECT: ZBA-96-A-90, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AMENDMENTS TO THE ZONING ORDINANCE
This application for amendments to the Zoning Ordinance was filed by the Village of Mount
Prospect. Three amendments are proposed as follows:
Amend Section 14.503.B. to change the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time from
8:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
2. Amend the existing regulations for home occupations in all residential districts, and
add standards to allow home occupations in residential districts subject to certain
performance standards, and appropriate definition in Section 14.2602.
Amend Section 14.101.G to clarify the interpretation of lot consolidations, and add
a definition of "zoning lot" to Section 14.2602.
These amendments will be discussed individually.
The Zoning Ordinance establishes the Zoning Board of Appeals meeting time as 8:00
p.m. In August of 1990, the Zoning Board determined that the meeting time should
be changed to 7:30 p.m., to perhaps handle more business at the regular meetings,
in hopes of avoiding special meetings every month during the busy spring and
summer season. This amendment merely changes the meeting time as stated in the
Zoning Ordinance.
Amendment 2
The Chamber has suggested that the Village consider adopting standards that would
allow home occupations. On August 28, 1990 Janet Hansen, Chamber Executive
Director, preliminarily discussed home occupations at a Committee -of -the -Whole
meeting. At that time, the Village Board determined it would be appropriate to refer
the matter to the Zoning Board of Appeals for a public hearing.
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
At the present time, Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance prohibits home occupations,
and offices in homes, "except that a surgeon, physician, dentist, lawyer, clergyman,
or other professional person using his residence for consultation, emergency
treatment or the performance of religious rites only, and not fie E neral practio
of the protimim."
However what we find in the community is a wide range of inconspicuous home
based businesses, many of which have Illinois revenue numbers. Home based
businesses vary from contractor's offices, part-time caterers, artist studios, to
computer consultants. Staff typically becomes aware of home occupation if it is one
that disturbs neighbors. These matters are investigated on a complaint basis.
The difficulty with the present requirements is that well-meaning residents call the
Village Hall and inquire about opening a home business, and are advised that the
Zoning Ordinance does not allow home occupations. In many cases, these residents
are aware of other home occupations in the Village, and do not understand why they
cannot gain approval.
It would be appropriate to amend the Zoning Ordinance to allow home occupations,
if the home-based business met certain standards. For example, a home occupation
should have no employees, display no sign, nor have any retail sales on premise.
Also, no home occupation should include storage of supplies or inventory.
Many communities regulate home occupations based on such performance standards,
and this would be a reasonable approach for Mount Prospect to consider. A survey
of members of the Northwest Municipal Conference indicates that virtually every
municipality has provisions to allow home occupations.
It is recommended that the following Sections be amended:
Amendment to ADD Home Occupations, as defined herein, to the following
Sections as permitted uses:
R -X 14.1001A R-2 14.1301A
R-1 14.1101A R-3 14.1401.A.
R -A 14.1201A R-4 14.1501A
Amendment to DELETE Home Occupations from the following Sections, as
specifically excluded uses:
R -X 14.1001.B.5 R-2 14.1301.B.4
R-1 14.1101.B.5 R-3 14.1401.B.5
R -A 14.1201.8.5 R-4 14.1501.13.5
ADD to Section 14.2602 the following definition:
Home Occupation - Home Occupations to be permitted in all
residential zoning districts, subject to the following definition and
performance standards:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals Page 3
Home Occupation is an accessory use conducted completely within a
dwelling unit, carried on by any member of the immediate family
residing on the premises, clearly incidental and secondary to the use
of the dwelling for residential purposes. The following standards shall
govern the operation of a home occupation:
1. There should be no sign, display or alteration that will indicate
from the exterior that the home is being utilized in whole or in
part for any purpose other than that of a dwelling.
2. No substantial amount of stock in trade shall be kept or
commodities sold.
3. No mechanical or electrical equipment shall be used or stored
except such as permissible for domestic or household purposes.
4. No offensive noise, vibration, smoke fumes, odor, heat or glare
or electrical interference shall be noticeable at or beyond the
property line.
5. No explosive or combustible materials shall be used.
6. No person shall be employed other than a member of the
immediate family residing on the premises.
7. No outside storage of any kind related to the home occupation
shall be permitted.
8. The home occupation shall not generate traffic or parking in
excess of what is normal in a residential neighborhood.
9. The home occupation shall not utilize more than 25 percent of
the gross floor area of the dwelling unit.
10. A professional person may use his residence for infrequent
consultation, emergency treatment, or performance of religious
rites, but not for the general practice of his profession.
Staff believes it is best to regulate home occupations based on such performance
standards, because this provides a measurement of impact on a neighborhood. This
is considered preferable to creating a lengthy list of permitted home occupations,
which might not be able to list every reasonable home business.
The Scope of Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance, Section 14.101.G, states that it
is unlawful "to construct one building on more than one lot, or to occupy more than
one lot by more than one main use." This is being interpreted to mean that a
principal building, such as a house, cannot be on more than 1 lot, or the portion of
any lot. For example, there are many homes built on two 25 foot lots. If a resident,
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 4
in such an example, hopes to add a room addition, current policy requires that the
two 25 foot lots be consolidated or combined into a 50 foot lot. In consolidating the
two 25 foot lots into one 50 foot lot, the resident then has only one building on one
lot, meeting the intent of the current requirement. This is an expensive and
unnecessary burden for a property owner. If a home has existed for years on two 25
foot lots, or some similar example, and it is being properly assessed, there is no
public benefit to having the property owner consolidate the parcel, in order to get
a building permit for a room addition or other improvement.
The Plan Commission has reviewed a number of such lot consolidations over the
years, and does not believe such a requirement is necessary. However, the Plan
Commission notes that consolidation plats should be done if there is the need for
easements or street dedications. The Plan Commission recommends that the Zoning
Board take appropriate action to amend Section 14.101 to eliminate the lot
consolidation requirement.
Staff recommends that Section 14.2602, Definitions, be amended to add a definition
of "zoning lot", as follows:
Ut, Zoning is a single tract of land located within a single block which (at the
time of filing for a building permit) is designated by its owner or developer
as a tract to be used, developed, or built upon as a unit, under single
ownership or control. Therefore, a "zoning lot or lots" may or may not
coincide with a lot of record.
With this definition, a tract of land is designated a buildable unit for zoning purposes,
thus not having to coincide exactly with one lot of record.
In researching this matter, staff found that a number of other suburban municipalities
utilize a zoning lot definition for similar purposes.
Further, staff recommends that the statement found in 14.101.G be deleted.
DepartmentU Illinois
V) 201 West Center Court/Schaumburg, Illinois/60196-1096
of Transportation
Division mHighways/District 1
PERMITS
Te-arly Resolution for Construction on State Highways
Mayor or Village President
All Municipalities in District One
Chapter 121 of the Illinois Revised Statutes requires that any
person, firm or corporation desiring to do work on
State -maintained rights of way must first obtain a written
permit from the Illinois Department of Transportation. This
includes any emergency work on broken *aterma1ns or sewers.
A surety bond is required with each permit application to
insure that all work is completed in accordance with State
specifications and that the right of way is properly restored.
For permit work to be performed `
resolutiona resolution is acceptable in lieu of the surety bond. This
__-_ not relieve contractors_h_-__ by the
municipality from conforming with the normal bonding
requirements nor from obtaining permits.
In order to expedite the issuance of permits to your
municipality during the calendar year, the attached sample
resolution should be adopted and e signed and certified copy
thereof returned to this offlcn. This resolution does not
constitute a blanket permit for work in the State system. A
separate application must be made in each instance. In the
case of an emergency, verbal authority may be given prior to .
receipt of the written application. After normal working hours
or on weekends, this authority can be obtained from our
Communications Center at (708) 705-4222.
We would appreciatethe cooperation of your community in
withholding the issuance of building ate
highways until the builder shows evidence of a State highway
permit having been obtained' Our permit staff would be willing
to answer any questions you may have regarding current policies
or practices and to work with your planning commission on any
new developments within your municipality. Do not hesitate to
contact us at (708) 705-413I if we may be of assistance.
Very truly yours,
James C. Slifer, P.E.
District Engineer
Daniel R. [hart, P.E.
Traffic Permit Engineer
CAF/
12/21/90
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION IN LIEU OF A SURETY BOND IN ORDER
TO PERFORM SPECIFIED CONSTRUCTION WORK
WITHIN STATE OF ILLINOIS RIGHTS-OF-WAY
WHEREAS, the village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois,
desires to undertake, in the year 1991, the location, construction,
operation and maintenance of driveways and street returns,
watermains, sanitary and storm sewers, street light, traffic
signals, sidewalk, landscaping, etc., on State highways, within the
Village of Mount Prospect, which by law and/or agreement come under
the jurisdiction and control of the Department of Transportation
of the State of Illinois; and
WHEREAS, an individual working permit must be obtained from the
Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois prior to any
of the aforesaid installations being constructed either by the
Village of Mount Prospect or by a private person or firm under
contract and supervision of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect pledges its good
faith and guarantees that all work shall be performed in accordance
with the conditions of the permit to be granted by the Department
of Transportation of the State of Illinois and to hold the State
of Illinois harmless on account on any damages that may occur to
persons or property during the prosecution of such work, and assume
all liability for damages to persons or property due to accidents
or otherwise by reason of the work which is to be performed under
the provision of said permit.
SECTION TWO: That the appropriate officials of the Village of
Mount Prospect are hereby authorized and directed to sign said
working permit on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
0
1991.
CAF/
12/26/90
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 17-86
DESIGNATING PERSONS WHO SHALL BE EXEMPT FROM
PAYING FOR MOUNT PROSPECT MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSES
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
have for many years issued motor vehicle license stickers or plates
to certain persons in recognition of the public service rendered
by them; and
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect desire to continue this practice, but to limit it
primarily to individuals associated with the government of Mount
Prospect and as specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE:, That Resolution No. 17-86 is hereby repealed in its
entirety.
SECTION TWO: That the following persons shall receive a mount
Prospect motor vehicle sticker or plate without payment of the fee
therefor, as established in Chapter 17 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, subject to the conditions set forth in
SECTION FIVE of this Resolution:
Architectural Commission;
Emergency Services Disaster Agency, being a Bureau of the Fire
Department;
Board of Fire and Police Commissioners;
Board of Health;
Board of Library Trustees;
Board of Local Improvements;
Business District Development and Re -Development Commission;
Cable Television Commission
Disabled Veterans of the Armed Services of the United States
of America, whose motor vehicle bears registration plates
issued pursuant to Section 3-609 of "The Illinois Vehicle
Code";
Electrical Commission;
Finance Commission;
Firemens' Pension Fund Board;
Plan Commission;
Police Pension Fund Board;
Recycling commission;
Safety Commission;
Sign Review Board;
Volunteer Fire Department; and
Zoning Board of Appeals
a
Sticker Exemptions
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: That the Village of Mount Prospect, the Mount
Prospect Park District, the River Trails Park District, and School
Districts 26, 57, 59 and 214, as well as all other vehicles having
Illinois State license plates with the "School Bus" designation
thereon shall be issued a Mount Prospect motor vehicle license
sticker or plate for each vehicle owned and operated by such body,
provided such vehicle is registered within the corporate limits of
the Village of Mount Prospect. Upon the receipt of such license
for such vehicle by such governmental agency, no fee as established
under the aforementioned Chapter 17 shall be paid therefor.
SECTION FOUR: That any not-for-profit organization shall receive
a Mount Prospect motor vehicle sticker or plate without payment of
the fee therefor established under Chapter 17 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect for all vehicles bearing Illinois State license
plates with the "School Bus" designation provided that such vehicle
is registered within the corporate limits of the Village of MOunt
Prospect. It is further provided than any not-for-profit
organization shall receive no more than one (1) Mount Prospect
motor vehicle sticker or plate without payment of the fee therefor,
as established under the aforementioned Chapter 17 for a vehicle
bearing Illinois State license plates with the 11CV11 designation
provided that such vehicle is registered within the corporate
limits of the Village of MOunt Prospect.
SECTION FIVE: That no person shall receive a motor vehicle license
sticker or plate without charge as provided in this Resolution
unless such person resides within the corporate limits of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the motor vehicle for which the
license sticker or plate is issued is registered within the
corporate limits of said Village. No person shall by virtue of
this Resolution receive more than one (1) such vehicle license
sticker or plate.
SECTION SIX: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1991.
caf/
12/2'7/90
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT AND
THE VILLAGE OF___MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect and the Forest River Fire
Protection District are desirous of entering into an
Intergovernmental Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Agreement being the subject of this
Resolution provides for the Village of Mount Prospect to provide
for the fire protection, fire prevention and emergency medical
services for that area known as the Forest River Fire Protection
District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby authorize the Mayor to sign and the Clerk to
attest her signature on the Intergovernmental Agreement between
the Forest River Fire Protection District and the Village of Mount
Prospect for the year 1991, a copy of which is attached hereto and
hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1991.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
C
FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HERETO
and
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT,
A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, HERETO
A G R E E M E N
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, hereinafter
referred to as "the Village", a municipal corporation organized
under the laws of the State of Illinois and the Forest River Fire
protection District, hereinafter referred to as the "District", a -
municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of
Illinois, and
WHEREAS, both the Village and the District are municipal
corporations organized under the laws of the State of Illinois and
as such have the power under State law to enter into agreements for
providing fire protection and emergency services, and
WHEREAS, the Village has agreed to provide such services
to the District in accordance with the terms hereinafter set forth.
NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE VILLAGE
AND THE DISTRICT AS FOLLOWS:
1. That for the period beginning January 1, 1991 to December
31, 1991, at 12:00 midnight said day, the Village shall furnish all
fire fighting, fire protection, fire prevention and other emergency
services, including emergency ambulance service, by such volunteer
or paid on call and/or regular firemen available to the Village as
the Fire Chief of the village shall determine, to the District for
a certain area as shown and outlined in orange on Exhibit I
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. That for the period of time during which this Agreement
shall be in full force and effect, the District agrees to pay and
the Village agrees to accept as full payment for said fire
protection, fire prevention services and emergency services, that
amount of monies received from tax receipts, replacement taxes,
interest and other miscellaneous income collected during the period
beginning January 1, 1991 and ending December 31, 1991, less all
reasonable costs of running the said District, including, but not
limited to, all administrative legal salaries and other expenses
incurred.
A. It is understood that the District shall levy
taxes at the maximum rate authorized by statute without
referendum, which shall not be less than .30% of the
value of all taxable property within the District, and
shall apply for and make all efforts to receive any
available state and/or federal aid to fire protection
districts as is now available or may be available during
the term hereof.
B. The District will retain the sum of $2,500.00
to handle any contingency or emergency matters that may
develop during the year. All other monies shall be paid
to the Village as follows:
2
On January 15, April 15, July 15 and October
15, 1991, all monies over and above the
aforementioned $2,500.00. contingency fund
shall be paid to the Village.
C. In addition, the District shall provide the
Village with the following:
(i) A copy of the Schedule of meetings of the
District for the year 1991, to be furnished
upon execution of this Agreement.
(ii) A certified copy of the Tax Levy ordinance
adopted by the District for the fiscal year
1990-91, to be furnished upon execution of
this Agreement.
(iii) A copy of the District's audited financial
statement for the period ending June 30, 1991,
to be furnished within thirty (30) days after
receipt by the District.
(iv) A copy Of the Minutes of each District
meeting, to be furnished within thirty (30)
days after each meeting, when requested by the
Village.
(v) The District shall provide the village with
copies of its quarterly receipts and
disbursements, for informational purposes
only, it being fully understood by the parties
that the Village has no right of pre -approval
regarding said disbursements.
3. That the Fire Chief of the Village shall have the
sole and exclusive right, duty and responsibility to prescribe the
manner and method of giving the alarm for fire and/or other
emergencies occurring within the District's territory as outlined
upon said Exhibit I.
4. That the Fire Chief of the Village or his authorized
representative shall have the sole and exclusive authority and
responsibility to direct and control any and all fire fighting,
fire protection, fire prevention and other emergency operations
3
carried on at the scene of any alarm or emergency occurring within
that territory of the District shown upon the said Exhibit I.
5. That all fire fighting, fire protection, fire
prevention and other emergency procedures conducted under the
provisions hereof shall be conducted in accordance with the
regulations of the Mount Prospect Fire Department and the
Ordinances of the Village. Furthermore, the District agrees that
within thirty (30) days of the execution hereof, if permitted by
State statute, it shall pass and approve Ordinances identical in
form and content to the ordinances of The Village which deal with
fire fighting, fire protection, fire prevention, building
construction as related to fire safety and other emergency
procedures. Certified copies of said Ordinance(s) shall be
submitted to the Village within ten (10) days of their adoption by
the District.
6. That all expenses and cost of maintaining equipment,
apparatus, salaries, insurance premiums and any and all other items
of expenses connected with the several services contemplated herein
to be supplied by the Village to the District shall be borne by the
Village. The only expense falling upon the District shall be in
the form of the payments scheduled to be made hereinabove under
Paragraph 2b.
7. That, within seven (7) days of receipt of notice of
annexation by any municipality of land and territory within its
district (as shown in orange upon the said Exhibit I hereto), the
District shall forward a copy of said notice (with the legal
4
description contained therein) to the Village by addressing same to
the attention of:
Village Clerk
loo south Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be executed by their respective officers and have
affixed hereunto their respective corporate seals, all having been
authorized by the adoption of a suitable Resolution passed and
approved by each of the respective parties hereto.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
By:
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
FOREST RIVER FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
By:
President
ATTEST:- 4
DATED this - day of , 19_.
k
Vk �a rT }
_ _
ki
p [.x�f aas
1 ^a
o �
girt P•
` 2
F
F
c
.
u
f -Pr 3
tnIry
w _ a
1`Ij-
CUM
C 1 h �r rr = it — �j t ,Tf { i 1 ILA
rCxrt3 r si sprat`T
NORTHFIELD
W
M
H
M
u
f -Pr 3
tnIry
w _ a
1`Ij-
CUM
C 1 h �r rr = it — �j t ,Tf { i 1 ILA
rCxrt3 r si sprat`T
NORTHFIELD
W
M
H
M
u
f -Pr 3
tnIry
w _ a
1`Ij-
CUM
C 1 h �r rr = it — �j t ,Tf { i 1 ILA
rCxrt3 r si sprat`T
NORTHFIELD
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois„
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1990
SUBJECT: 1991 INSURANCE PROPOSALS
Attached is a memorandum from Finance Director Dave Jepson on the Insurance
Proposals for this coming year. The original proposals are for an increase of $9,000,
however, there was a significant reduction in the definition of Wrongful Act under the
Public Officials' Liability Insurance. After discussion, it was determined that Dave should
go back to the broker and determine if we can get similar coverage as we have had in
the past since the reductions in the definition were so significant that it really did not
give us much benefit at all.
The quotation for coverage with the $25,000 deductible is approximately $20,000 more
than what it was last year. Our insurance expectations for an increase were in the 5-
7% range which the original premiums fall with the reduced Public Officials' coverage.
However, with the enhanced Public Officials' coverage, the increase is significant.
I would request that the Board reconsider the Auto Liability insurance which we added
last year for the first time. We paid $30,000 in premium for $100,000 deductible up to
$1 million. We have had one claim last year that was $40,000. All other claims were
very minor. We have never had an auto claim of over $100,000 by the Village. If we
were to self -insure the entire insurance limit of $1 million, we have approximately $1.2
million insurance fund of the Village. If there is a major claim, it would take three to
four years before there would be any payment.
I believe we can save the $30,000 and reduce our premium including the enhanced Public
Officials' liability for a total amount of $150,500.
Mlw.
IMI
•° • r •Im
JFD/rcw
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois M(g
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Directory
DATE: December 28, 1990
SUBJECT: 1991 Insurance Proposals
The Village has a partial self-insurance program for property, liability and workers'
compensation whereby we are self-insured for various amounts and we purchase insurance
for amounts above the self-insured portion. Following is a summary of our present
insurance coverage including the premium for 1990 and the proposed premium for 1991:
Insurance
--i-A-Mill—
Public Officials $1,000,000
Law Enforcement 1,000,000
Workers' Comp Statutory
Auto Liability 1,000,000
Paramedic Liability 500,000
Property Insurance 22,000,000
Totals
2153J62 $162,G80
The coverage for 1991 is essentially the same as for 1990 with the exception of the
Public Officials Liability where there is a major change in the coverage. The proposed
Public Officials coverage is based upon a new policy from the same company that
provided the coverage in 1990. However, the wording of the new policy is considerably
different. The definition of "Wrongful Acts" which would be the actions covered by
the policies are compared below:
1990 Definition
WRONGFUL ACT - means any actual or
alleged error or misstatement or
act of omission or neglect or
violation of any federal or state
civil rights, or breach of duty
including misfeasance, malfeasance,
or nonfeasance by the INSUREDS in
the discharge of their duties for
the PUBLIC ENTITY, individually or
collectively, or any matter claimed
against them solely by reason of
their being or having been INSUREDS.
1991 Definition
WRONGFUL ACT(S) - means any
actual or alleged violation
of any federal, state or local
civil rights, or, breach of duty
by the INSURED in the discharge
of duties for the PUBLIC ENTITY
individually or collectively.
1990
1991
Deductible
Premium
Premium
25,000
$ 17,929
$ 19,980
100,000
34,376
37,852
250,000
41,500
44,022
100,000
30,000
30,000
250
5,567
5,567
25,000
24,497
25,259
2153J62 $162,G80
The coverage for 1991 is essentially the same as for 1990 with the exception of the
Public Officials Liability where there is a major change in the coverage. The proposed
Public Officials coverage is based upon a new policy from the same company that
provided the coverage in 1990. However, the wording of the new policy is considerably
different. The definition of "Wrongful Acts" which would be the actions covered by
the policies are compared below:
1990 Definition
WRONGFUL ACT - means any actual or
alleged error or misstatement or
act of omission or neglect or
violation of any federal or state
civil rights, or breach of duty
including misfeasance, malfeasance,
or nonfeasance by the INSUREDS in
the discharge of their duties for
the PUBLIC ENTITY, individually or
collectively, or any matter claimed
against them solely by reason of
their being or having been INSUREDS.
1991 Definition
WRONGFUL ACT(S) - means any
actual or alleged violation
of any federal, state or local
civil rights, or, breach of duty
by the INSURED in the discharge
of duties for the PUBLIC ENTITY
individually or collectively.
John Fulton Dixon
December 28, 1990
1991 Insurance Proposals
Based upon the restrictions included in the 1991 policy, our insurance consultant,
Corporate Policyholder's Counsel (CPC), did not think we should purchase the proposed
coverage. I then asked our broker to try to obtain similar coverage to what we had
in 1990. He provided a quotation of $34,364 for $1,000,000 with a $50,000 deductible
and $37,800 for a $25,000 deductible.
CPC feels strongly that the Village should carry Public Officials insurance. It is
the means of protecting elected and appointed officials as well as all boards and
commission members from claims resulting from errors or omissions in fulfilling their
Village responsibilities. Without this coverage, individuals could be personally
responsible for a claim and under certain circumstances the Village may not be allowed
to reimburse the individual for the potential judgement. CPC recommends that we accept
one of the alternates for the coverage that was similar to last year.
The increase in the Law Enforcement premium for 1991 is due to the addition of 6 police
officers in the 89/90 fiscal year. Also the increase in Workers' Comp is due to higher
payroll amounts for 1991, and the Property Insurance increase is due to a change in
the rating of the Village Hall for 1991. Our insurance consultant recommends accepting
the proposals as presented for each of the other lines of insurance.
It is my recommendation that we accept the Public Officials coverage with the $25,000
deductible and the other lines as presented. The total cost of the insurance coverage
when the $37,800 premium is used in place of the $19,980 is $180,500.
DCJ/sm
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois -e-<
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director
DATE: December 28, 1990
SUBJECT: Medical Insurance Claims Administration Agreement
The Village's Medical Insurance Program is a self-insured plan whereby the
Village is responsible for all claims up to $50,000 and stop -loss insurance is
purchased for claims in excess of that amount. Under a self-insured plan of this
kind, it is necessary that we use a claims administrator. The claims
administrator processes claims and makes payments from a special account that
is provided for that purpose. one of the other services that the claims
administrator provides is pre -certification, or medical advisory services, for
each non -emergency hospital stay and elective surgery.
In January 1990, the Village changed claims administrators to Brookfield, Inc.
Brookfield's services have been excellent this year and our Medical Insurance
Committee unanimously recommended that we continue with their services.
Brookfield initially proposed a 9.5% increase in their fee for 1991 for a one
year agreement citing the unusually high number of claims that they had
processed. I subsequently asked for a proposal for a three year agreement. That
proposal calls for a 7.5% increase for 1991 and an increase not to exceed 68 for
1992 and 1993.
The current fee is $11.05 per member per month and for 1991 the fee will increase
to $11.88. The amount paid in 1990 and the estimated amount in 1991 is as
follows:
1.990 1991
250 Village Employees $33,150 $35,640
30 Library Employees 3,978 4,277
35 Retirees 4,641 4.990
Totals $41,769 44,907
It is my recommendation that we accept the Brookfield proposal for a fee of
$11.88 per employee per month for 1991, with an increase not to exceed 6% for
1992 and 1993.
DCJ/sm
DUNCAN & ASSOCIATES INC.
December 17, 1990
14r. David C. Jepson
Director of Finance
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Brookfield
Dear Dave:
Duncan & Associates has completed negotiations with Brookfield
for your upcoming contract term, January 1, 1991 thru December
31, 1991, with an increase in fees of seven point five percent
(7.5%).
Contract years 1992 and 1993 will have a maximum increase of six
percent (68).
Dave, Brookfield expressed some concern regarding utilization,
however, there is no, nor will there be a special caveat for
contract years 1992 and 1993 linked to utilization. Presently we
are gazing into a crystal ball and I would expect, should
utilization increase dramatically (258 to 508 range of
transactions) or should we by virtue of changing the program
cause Brookfield's expenses to increase, a review based upon
these aspects, subject to your approval, would be amenable.
Bottom line, we have secured a three (3) year guarantee of seven
point five percent (7.58) for contract year 1991 with a maximum
of six percent (68) for contract years 1992 and 1993.
Sincerely,
Michael W. Duncan
17W F, 1-03 Tom
cc: Mr. Charles Lohenry
1
500 Skokie Boulevard, e Suite 535 0 Northbrook, Illinois 60062
•
08 205-9499 Fax 709 205-9392
Mr. David C. Jepson
Director of Finance
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Brookfield Renewal
Dear Dave:
December 17, 1990
Sent via FAX 12/17/90,
original under
separate cover.
Brookfield has notified Duncan & Associates of their renewal
position, Brookfield requests an increase in fees of seven point
five percent (7.5%), as follows;
Current Administrative Fees
Brookfield
Claim Fee Review
$ 9.25 $ 1.80
Total $ 11.05
Increase 7.58
Renewal Administrative Fees
Brookfield
Claim Fee —Review
$ 10.08 $ 1.80
$ 11.88
Dave, I don't feel Brookfield's request is ambitious and under
the circumstances and services rendered I feel the adjustment is
warranted.
Duncan & Associates' recommendation is to renew at the fees
outlined. Please excuse the delay, however, our analysis took a
few days to finalize.
MWD: pc
cc: Mr. Charles Lohenry
Sincerely,
Michael W. Duncan
NT
GE'Or I
DEC
*CfNED
500 Skokie Boulevard • Suite $35 • Northbrook, Illinois 60062 0 708 205-94" • Fax 708 205-9392
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois a<„
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director
DATE: December 28, 1990
SUBJECT: State Income Tax Surcharge
A question was raised by Trustee Van Geem regarding the amount of the State
Income Tax Surcharge that is paid by Mount Prospect residents and how much is
ultimately returned to the Village. I am not aware of any definitive information
that is available to answer these questions, but the following calculations may
be helpful:
1. Estimated 1990 per capita income $18,500 (a)
2. Village population 53,000
3, Total estimated Village income $980,500,000
4. Less estimated non-taxable portion @ 208 <196,100.000> (b)
5„ Total estimated taxable income $784,400,000
6. Surcharge tax rate (3.08 - 2.58) .005
7. Total estimated Surcharge receipts $3,922
(a) The per capita income is based upon a 1985 NIPC amount of $15,229 which
has been increased by 48 annually.
(b) The non-taxable portion would include personal exemptions of $53 million,
$125 million in property taxes, and the balance in other non-taxable income
such as interest on U. S. securities.
The Village receives approximately $300,000 in additional State Income Tax
receipts and $1,338,000 in Surcharge receipts annually from the above amount.
The total is $1,668,000.
When the legislation was passed, the intention was that municipalities and school
districts would share the receipts equally. The municipal receipts are
John Fulton Dixon
December 28, 1990
State Income Tax Surcharge
distributed on a per capita basis and are relatively easy to calculate, however
the distribution to the school districts is based on the State -aid formula.
Because of this I do not know how much the Mount Prospect school districts have
received. The problem is compounded because the school district boundaries are
not co -terminus with the Village's boundaries. As a result, I do not know the
total that has been returned to the Village of Mount Prospect.
My personal convictions regarding the State Income Tax Surcharge is that it
should be made permanent. Although all taxes are unpopular, I believe an income
tax is the most equitable method of taxation. From a practical point of view,
if the Surcharge is not extended it will put much greater pressure on local
property taxes.
DCJ/sm
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W eUSSE 91��
TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE A VAN SEEM
-rHEUDOREJ WATTENEEAG Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MARIAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A. FIELDS
Phone: 70B / 392-6000
Fax: 70B / 392-6022
NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect will meet on Saturday,
February 2, 1991 at 11:00 AM at the Senior Center, 50 South Emerson
Street, Mount Prospect for the purpose of discussing the
dissemination of information in support of the advisory referendum
question on the April 2, 1991 ballot relative to the new Fire and
Police Station.
Residents are invited to attend.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 25th day of January, 1991
MAYOR
GERALD L. FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR ASM
MARK W BUSSE
TIMOTHY J CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
HEODORE J WATTENBERG Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056
CAROL A FIELDS
Phone: 70B / 392-6000
Fax: 70e / 392-6022
NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect will meet with members
the Mount Prospect Park District Board and the Arlington Heights
Park District Board on Thursday, January 31, 1991 at the hour of
7:30 PM at the Arlington Heights Park District Administration
Building, 410 North Arlington Heights Road, Arlington Heights,
Illinois, for the purpose of discussing the Melas Park Agreement. 4
Residents are invited to attend and express their opinions on
this subject.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk -
Dated this 17th day of January, 1991.
Phone: 70e / 392-6000
Fax: 70e / 392-6022
NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect will meet in
Executive Session on Tuesday, January 22, 1991 at 6:45 P.M.
at the Senior Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect
for the purpose of discussing the potential litigation.
The Village Board will convene a Special Meeting of the
President and Board of Trustees immediately following the
Executive Session at approximately 7:30 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 19th day of January, 1991.
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH WARTHUR
MARK W BUSSE
TIMOTHY jCORCORAN
LEO FLOPOS
SEORGE A VA04 GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE
E MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois SOOSS
CAROL A. FIELDS
Phone: 70e / 392-6000
Fax: 70e / 392-6022
NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect will meet in
Executive Session on Tuesday, January 22, 1991 at 6:45 P.M.
at the Senior Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect
for the purpose of discussing the potential litigation.
The Village Board will convene a Special Meeting of the
President and Board of Trustees immediately following the
Executive Session at approximately 7:30 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 19th day of January, 1991.
Phone: 70B / 392-8000
Fax: 7oe / 392-6022
NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect will meet in Executive
Session at 9:00 AM on Saturday, April 13, 1991, for the purpose of
discussing pending litigation. This meeting will be held in the
Trustees' Room, Second Floor, at the Village Hall, 100 South
Emerson Street.
Velma W. Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
Dated this 9th day of April, 1991.
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W. BUSSE
TIMOTHY J. CORMRAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE A. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
Village of
Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROLA. FIELDS
Phone: 70B / 392-8000
Fax: 7oe / 392-6022
NOTICE OF MEETING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect will meet in Executive
Session at 9:00 AM on Saturday, April 13, 1991, for the purpose of
discussing pending litigation. This meeting will be held in the
Trustees' Room, Second Floor, at the Village Hall, 100 South
Emerson Street.
Velma W. Lowe
Deputy Village Clerk
Dated this 9th day of April, 1991.