The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About6.12 Motion to further continue the continuance of consideration of the 1st reading of an ORDINANCE FOR A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 112 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY TO THE DECEMBER 14, 2021 SPECIAL MEETING OF THE VILLAGE BOARD AGENDAMr�GauC �'d'+rt;�iect Subject Motion to further continue the continuance o consideration of the 1st reading of an ORDINANCE FOR A FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTYLOCATED AT 112 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY TO THE DECEMBER 14, SPECIAL2021 MEETING OF THE VILLAGE Meeting December 7, 2021 - REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT VILLAGE BOARD - Fiscal Impact false Dollar Amount Budget Source Category CONSENT AGENDA Type Consent The Petitioner is proposing to demolish the existing, vacant structure and construct a mixed-use building with related improvements. The proposed building, named HQ Residences, would be a 6 -story structure with 88 luxury rental units (6 townhome units with garages, 9 studio units, 62 one bedroom units, 11 two bedroom units), 3,500 square feet of retail/restaurant space, and 120 onsite parking stalls (1.36 parking stalls/unit). The building is proposed to be fully amenitized with a gym and fitness areas, an indoor and outdoor recreation area, and more. Parking is to be provided both at grade to the north of the building, and underground, utilizing the existing underground parking garage. Ten on -street parking spaces are provided along Maple Street for customer parking for the proposed retail space. The gross building area for the project is 128,935 square feet with a net residential square footage of 76,624 square feet. Site ingress and egress would be off of Maple Street, with two full access points into the at -grade parking lot, and one full access point leading to the underground parking area. 1 The Petitioner is proposing to invest over $28 million into the downtown district, furthering the vision set out by the downtown implementation plan, comprehensive plan, and the Village's strategic plan. The Petitioner, while representing a different LLC, has invested in the downtown before. In 2019, the Petitioner received approval and later constructed a 5 story, 97 unit apartment building located at 10 N. Main Street, and recently received approval to construct a 5 story, mixed-use building located at 1-27 W. Prospect Avenue, named Prospect Place'. Both developments are class 'A' apartment buildings with top of the line finishes, appliances, and materials throughout the building. The Petitioner is seeking to provide an even higher quality of construction on the Subject Property. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for a conditional use to allow for a final PUD and finds that the standards have been met. The proposed PUD will revitalize vacant Village property in the downtown area, and the proposal to construct a 6 story mixed-use building comprised of 88 dwelling units and 3,500 square feet of retail/restaurant space is consistent with the Village's Downtown Implementation Plan and the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The development will not have a detrimental impact to the public and be in no way injurious to surrounding properties. The proposed development is consistent with the trend of development in the area. Further, the Village's Comprehensive Plan identifies the Subject Property as being part of the downtown area and suggests a mix of commercial and residential uses be allowed. The proposed conditional use will be located in the downtown area of the Village, while the underlying zoning is B -5C, the most flexible and dense zoning district in the Village. The proposed development adds an attractive mixed-use apartment building to the downtown area that further diversifies the rental housing stock available. The proposal will have no significant impact on traffic conditions in the vicinity and a very limited impact on the adjacent neighborhoods, utility provision, and public streets. The proposed conditional use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Implementation Plan, Strategic Plan, and Zoning Ordinance. The Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on September 9th and after reviewing all facts presented, voted 7-0 to recommend approval of the request. At the meeting, a few residents raised concerns related to the need for affordable housing in the Village. 2 Alternatives 1. Approve a motion to further continue consideration of the 1st reading of an ordinance for a final Planned Unit Development for property located at 112 E. NW Highway until the December 14th Special Meeting of the Village Board agenda. 2. Discretion of the Village Board. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Village Board approve a motion to further continue consideration of the 1st reading of an ordinance for a final Planned Unit Development for property located at 112 E. Northwest Highway until the December 14, 2021 Special Meeting of the Village Board agenda. ATTACHMENTS: Staff Report. pdf Administrative Content.pdf Plans. pdf Public Comment.pdf PZ -14-21 112 E. Northwest Highway P & Z minutes.pdf 3 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 50 S. Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, IL 60056 STAFF REPORT FROM THE DEPARTMENT OF Community Development William J. Cooney, AICP Connor Harmon Director of Community Development Senior Development Planner ........ na.......... .... ............. ..., ................ ...... _ .. __................ DATE: September 2n', 2021 CASE NUMBER PZ -14-21 PUBLIC HEARING DATE September 9th, 2021 BRIEF SUMMARY OF REQUEST APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER T2 Capital Management, LLC PROPERTY ADDRESS/LOCATION 112 E. Northwest Highway T2 Capital Management, LLC, the "Petitioner", is proposing to construct a six -story, mixed-use planned unit development (PUD) consisting of 88 residential units and 3,500 square feet of retail/restaurant space. The Village Code requires conditional use approval for a PUD that allows for unified zoning control over the entire mixed-use development. The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as Downtown Mixed -Use, and the Subject Property is zoned B-5 Central Commercial Core, the most flexible and dense zoning designation in the Village. The proposed use complies with the primary and secondary uses in the district and the conditional use standards. Staff is supportive of the request. 2020 Aerial Image 2021 Village of Mount Prospect Zoning Map EXISTING EXISTING LAND ZONING USE/SITE 13-5C Central IMPROVEMENTS Commercial Former Police/Fire Core District Headquarters SURROUNDING ZONING & LAND USE North: R -A, R-1 Single Family Residential, residential East: R -A Single Family Residential, residential, B-5 Central Commercial, commercial South: B-5 Central Commercial, commercial West: 13-5C Central Commercial Core, commercial STAFF RECOMMENDATION APPROVEPPRO�ITH CONDITION SIZE OF PROPERTY 1.283 acres DENY 4 History of the Sub-Subjett Property The Subject Property, also known as the former Police/Fire Headquarters, has been vacant for just over a year as both the Police and Fire Departments relocated to 911 E. Kensington Road and 111 E. Rand Road, respectively. Prior to the move, both the Police and Fire Department called the Subject Property home for more than 25 years. Due to the expansion, annexation, and general development of Mount Prospect as a destination, additional space and facilities were needed to service the entire emergency needs of the Village. The site itself is in the heart of downtown Mount Prospect, and is a key gateway entrance into the downtown on Northwest Highway. In Fall of 2019, the Village released a request for proposals (RFP) for the Subject Property, which netted three responses. The Village selected Greystar as the preferred developer, which envisioned a redevelopment that encompassed nearly the entire block, including the six story office building to the north, and the former Busse Flowers building to the west. Due to significant difficulties in relocating several cell towers on top of the existing 6 story office building, as well as navigating the Pandemic, Greystar pulled out of the proposed deal. In Spring of 2021, the Village released a new RFP for the redevelopment or reuse of the property and received three responses, all with different visions and ideas for redevelopment. It was identified that the Petitioner, T2 Capital Management, LLC, had the most feasible and well-rounded plan for redevelopment, and thus was selected as the preferred developer. ProposalSummary of The Petitioner is proposing to demolish the existing, vacant structure and construct a mixed-use building with related improvements. The proposed building, named HQ Residences, would be a 6 -story structure with 88 luxury rental units (6 townhome units with garages, 9 studio units, 62 one bedroom units, 11 two bedroom units), 3,500 square feet of retail/restaurant space, and 120 onsite parking stalls (1.36 parking stalls/unit). The building is proposed to be fully amenitized with a gym and fitness areas, an indoor and outdoor recreation area, and more. Parking is to be provided both at grade to the north of the building, and underground, utilizing the existing underground parking garage. Ten on -street parking spaces are provided along Maple Street for customer parking for the proposed retail space. The gross building area for the project is 128,935 square feet with a net residential square footage of 76,624 square feet. Site ingress and egress would be off of Maple Street, with two full access points into the at -grade parking lot, and one full access point leading to the underground parking area. The Petitioner is proposing to invest over $28 million into the downtown district, furthering the vision set out by the downtown implementation plan, comprehensive plan, and the Village's strategic plan. The Petitioner, while representing a different LLC, has invested in the downtown before. In 2019, the Petitioner received approval and later constructed a 5 story, 97 unit apartment building located at 10 N. Main Street, and recently received approval to construct a 5 story, mixed-use building located at 1-27 W. Prospect Avenue, named 'Prospect Place'. Both developments are class 'A' apartment buildings with top of the line finishes, appliances, and materials throughout the building. The Petitioner is seeking to provide an even higher quality of construction on the Subject Property. Site Plan: The site plan shows the primary facade of the building will face, and be between five and fifteen feet setback from the property line along Northwest Highway. The restaurant/retail space will be located at the southeast corner of the building, and feature a large outdoor area for outdoor dining in the warmer months. An outdoor recreation area for residents is proposed behind the building to the north with a 2 5 terraced landscaped feature. Angled parking stalls along Maple Street adjacent to the development will provide additional parking access for patrons accessing the retail/restaurant space. New streetscape improvements will be installed around the entire site, including the walks to and from the parking lot and building entrances. Trash collection, deliveries, and move ins will be staged at the eastern portion of the site, near the angled parking area along Maple Street. In total, 43 at -grade parking stalls are proposed, which will be a mix of resident, visitor, and public parking for the retail/restaurant space. Additionally, 6 garages are proposed on the north facade of the building (11 stalls total), for parking provided for the 6 townhomes. Floor Plans: The below grade floor plan indicates a total of 66 parking stalls and a utility and storage area to be provided. The aforementioned ground floor plan (site plan) will provide an additional 43 parking stalls, along with the 11 garage stalls, outdoor recreation areas, leasing office, mail room, retail/restaurant space, and outdoor dining space. At this time, the Village is not aware of a secured tenant, however the Petitioner plans to market the space to local breweries, brew pubs, and associated concepts. Level 2 will feature the upper levels of the townhomes, 6 one bedroom units, and fitness area. The retail/restaurant space will occupy two levels in total to accommodate the commercial kitchen and associated interior build out. Levels 3-6 will feature a mix of studio, one bedroom, and two bedroom units. Several, but not all of the units will have private balconies. The proposed balconies are on all facades of the building at varying degrees. Lot Coverage: The B -5C zoning district does not have a lot coverage requirement. Further, stormwater detention is not required by the Village in the underlying B -5C zoning. Limited green space is to be provided in the form of a terraced green roof to the north of the main entrance. Other sodded areas are indicated north and west of the at -grade parking lot. The Petitioner is proposing to satisfy MWRD storm water volume control requirements by providing through an underground vault with a solid bottom. Building Elevations: The Petitioner has hired OKW Architects to design and create a welcoming and upscale building that is reflective, yet unique of recent development in the downtown. The project proposes a new component to the luxury rental apartment concept by incorporating walk-up style townhomes with their own rear facing garages. Combining a hopeful brewpub/brewery concept with the luxury rental housing above provides adjacencies not yet seen in the downtown. The building would be constructed entirely of masonry, utilizing a patterned face brick design to blend the copperstone, gray blend, and midnight black brick colors together, along with metal canopies, cornices and hanging balconies (primarily on the rear fagade). Elevations and perspectives particularly show the recessed nature of the building materials which create a good amount of relief and stepping in the vertical direction of the building. The first floor features all copperstone face brick, which generally shows great texture and appears to be a modular brick. The two story profile of the townhomes blends extremely well with the one story profile of the retail/restaurant space, with considerable windows and natural lighting proposed in the retail/restaurant space. In total, the building height reaches a peak of 74' 10" at the corner of Maple Street and Northwest Highway. Besides the metal corniced peak to the east, the maximum height of the building does not exceed 68' 10". Significant attention was paid to the western fagade adjacent to the Busse flowers building, which will be y 3 1J visible to motorists and train patrons traveling southeast along the Northwest Highway corridor. Architectural features of the fagade include two areas of alternating coursings, recessed copperstone brick, several floor to ceiling glass windows, and marquis sign for the project (HQ Residences). There is also a significant opportunity to create a terraced landscape and outdoor recreation sanctuary for residents in the rear of the building, where the site plan indicates a green roof is proposed. Staff will work with the Petitioner to ensure the landscaped feature will be a thoughtful design and an engaging space for future residents. Parking: Village Code requires 1 space per unit for one bedroom units, 1.5 spaces per unit for two bedroom units, and 2 spaces per unit for 3 bedroom units. With 6 three bedroom townhome units, 71 studio/one bedroom units, and 11 two bedroom units, 100 residential parking stalls are required by Code. 120 parking stalls are proposed by the Petitioner, resulting in a 1.36 parking stalls per dwelling unit ratio, thus satisfying the Village's downtown residential parking requirements. Additional parking stalls within the Maple Street right-of-way (ROW) are proposed. If approved, the Village will work with the Petitioner to fully maximize the amount of parking provided along the Maple Street ROW to support the proposed retail space at the corner of Maple Street and NW Highway. At 3,500 square feet, the retail/restaurant portion of the project requires 4 parking stalls per Village Code. Similarly, the parking requirement is met, with at least an additional 29 parking stalls provided on-site and within the Maple Street ROW. Should overflow parking occur, the east Metra lot across Northwest Highway is a viable option for patrons wishing to visit the retail/restaurant space in the evenings. Landscaping: While limited, landscaping is proposed within all green space on the Subject Property. A variety of shade, evergreen, deciduous, and ornamental trees and shrubs are proposed. The green roof will incorporate a terraced landscaped feature which is to be determined, but is required for at -grade volume control per MWRD. Staff will work with the Petitioner to ensure the green roof is well thought out and provides its residents with a viable recreational amenity. Schools: With 88 residential dwelling units proposed as part of this project, school aged children will likely be generated. Staff used generation rates based on the School Consulting Services' 1996 study of the Chicago Metropolitan Area to project that the proposed development will generate between 5 and 6 children, with approximately 5 going to D57 schools and 1 going to D214 schools. It should be noted that state TIF statutes require the Village pay all applicable school districts an annual payment for any students generated by housing developments located in the TIF district. The payment is equal to the average cost the district incurs to educate each pupil; therefore, the school districts are made whole for the cost of educating any students generated by this project. This dollar amount is adjusted each year as costs of education change. Absorption: Due to the significant investment of over a quarter of a billion dollars and over 500 units either constructed, under constructed, or proposed to be constructed in the downtown area, it is important to be cognizant of the absorption rate of the class 'A' rental product as it relates to this proposal. To date, each development constructed after 2017 is experiencing better than expected absorption, with 20 West leased at 95%, 10 n 4 7 Main leased at over 75% (started leasing in March), and Maple Street Lofts Building A leased at over 40% (started leasing in May). For homeownership, all 14 rowhomes at Park Terrace have been purchased, and over 40% of the 56 rowhomes at Maple Street Lofts have been purchased, indicating a strong real estate and rental markets as it relates to the Village. Traffic: The Petitioner has hired Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA) to prepare a traffic evaluation of the potential impact that the project would have on surrounding streets in the downtown area. The results of the study indicate the proposed development traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. The findings are due to a number of factors, including the reduction in volume due to the proximity of the development to the Mount Prospect Metra train station, which qualifies the development as a transit oriented design (TOD). Further, development -generated traffic will only add approximately 3% to the total traffic projected to be traversing the intersection of Main Street and Northwest Highway during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Finally, the study and capacity analysis revealed the proposed access drives and amount of on-site parking is sufficient for the number of units proposed and projected parking demand. The study also provided parking rates per the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation Manual (5th edition), which resulted in a parking requirement of 100 parking stalls per the 88 proposed units of the development. This indicates a surplus of 20 parking stalls, which can be utilized (along with the 9 parking stalls along Maple Street) toward the retail/restaurant space parking. The proposed parking ratio exceeds the parking ratios in similarly approved projects in the downtown: COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATION The Village Comprehensive Plan designates the Subject Property as Downtown Mixed -Use, which consists of a diverse mix of uses and supports the development of a vibrant downtown. A key characteristic of the district is to encourage the provision of high-density residential uses that include a variety of unit types, price ranges, and ownership and rental options. Retail and medium to high-density multi -family residential uses are primary and secondary uses in the district. The proposed development is consistent with the long- range goals of the Village Comprehensive Plan. COMPATIBILITY WITH THE 2021-2022 VILLAGE STRATEGIC PLAN The Village of Mount Prospect Strategic Plan is a working document for the Village's leadership team and provides staff a collection of goals, policies, and priorities to adhere to and complete for the specified calendar year. The 2021-2022 Strategic Plan identifies the Police/Fire redevelopment as a top priority action item on the policy agenda. 5 C3 COMPATIBILITY WITH VILLAGE CODE The standards for conditional uses are listed in Section 14.203.F.8 of the Village Zoning Ordinance and include seven specific findings that must be made in order to approve a conditional use. The following list is a summary of these findings: • The conditional use will not have a detrimental impact on the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare; • The conditional use will not be injurious to the use, enjoyment, or value of other properties in the vicinity or impede the orderly development of those properties; • There is adequate provision for utilities, drainage, and design of access and egress to minimize congestion on Village streets; and • The request is in compliance of the conditional use with the provisions of the Comprehensive Plan, Zoning Code, and other Village Ordinances. The Petitioner states that the proposed development will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The Petitioner states further that the surrounding properties in Block 56 are commercial in nature and a multi -family residential apartment building with first floor -commercial ':s a compatible use. The Petitioner states the significant investment in the property will enhance property values and be an improvement to an otherwise vacant and underutilized property. Additionally, the Petitioner states that adequate measures have been taken to provide ingress and egress as to minimize traffic congestion in public streets. Finally, the Petitioner states the Village's Comprehensive Plan identifies downtown redevelopment as a potential opportunity in the document, and that a transit oriented development is preferred in the revitalization of the downtown Mount Prospect. Staff has reviewed the Petitioner's request for a conditional use to allow for a final PUD and finds that the standards have been met. The proposed PUD will revitalize vacant Village property in the downtown area, and the proposal to construct a 6 story mixed-use building comprised of 88 dwelling units and 3,500 square feet of retail/restaurant space is consistent with the Village's Downtown Implementation Plan and the Village's Comprehensive Plan. The development will not have a detrimental impact to the public and be in no way injurious to surrounding properties. The proposed development is consistent with the trend of development in the area. Further, the Village's Comprehensive Plan identifies the Subject Property as being part of the downtown area and suggests a mix of commercial and residential uses be allowed. The proposed conditional use will be located in the downtown area of the Village, while the underlying zoning is B -5C, the most flexible and dense zoning district in the Village. The proposed development adds an attractive mixed-use apartment building to the downtown area that further diversifies the rental housing stock available. The proposal will have no significant impact on traffic conditions in the vicinity and a very limited impact on the adjacent neighborhoods, utility provision, and public streets. The proposed conditional use is in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Downtown Implementation Plan, Strategic Plan, and Zoning Ordinance. Staff finds that the proposal meets the conditional use standards and that granting such request would be in the best interest of the Village. Staff recommends that the Planning & Zoning Commission make a motion to adopt staff's findings as the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and recommend approval of the following motion: 9 1. A Conditional Use for a final planned unit development (PUD) consisting of a six -story, eighty eight (88) unit apartment and townhome building with three thousand five hundred (3,500) square feet of commercial space and sixty six (66) underground parking stalls, forty three (43) at - grade parking stalls, and eleven (11) at -grade garage stalls, subject to the following conditions of approval: a. Submittal of landscape, irrigation, and photometric plans that comply with Village codes and regulations; b. Visual warning devices shall be provided at the garage exit on Maple Street; c. In consultation with IDOT, a high visibility crosswalk shall be provided across NW Highway on the west leg of the intersection with Maple Street; d. Building materials shall reflect the copperstone, gray blend, and midnight black brick manufactured by Interstate Brick. Any alterations to any building material shall be approved by the Community Development Director; e. The entire building shall be constructed with full, face brick veneer besides the 6th floor, which shall be a thin brick veneer; f. The Petitioner shall install new streetscape improvements along the property's Maple Street and NW Highway frontages; g. Fire hydrants shall be provided around the perimeter of the building at a maximum of three hundred feet (300') spacing measured along access roads. Such hydrants shall be installed not more than fifty feet (50') nor less than twenty five feet (25') from the building. Fire hydrants will be required within three hundred feet (300') (spacing) around the entire building. An additional fire water loop may be required depending on the configuration around the building; h. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by OKW Architects dated August 26th, 2021; and i. Development of the building in general conformance with the plans prepared by OKW Architects dated August 26th, 2021. The Village Board's decision is final for this case.. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTENTt�LANS OTHER 'oning Request Application, Responses to Flat of Survey, Site Plan, etc.) (Supplemental Information, Public Standartds„ at... Comments Received, etc...) I concur: William J. Cooney, AICP Director of Community Development 7 10 rMzN.wpW0,77�„,,„, Village of Mount Prospect Community Development Department 50 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Phone: (847) 818-5328 Zoning Request Application Official Use Only (To be completed by Village Case Number: P&Z Date of Submission: Hearing Date: Project Name/Address: I. Subject Property Address(es): 112 East NgrthwestHighway Zoning District (s): D&C Property Area (Sq.Ft. and/or Acreage): 1.283 acres Parcel Index Number(s) (PIN(s): 08-12-109-029-0000 1 11 V. Property Owner ❑ Check if Same as Applicant Name: Village of Mount Prospect Corporation: Address: City, State, ZIP Code: Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056 Phone: .,_ _ 847 392-6000 �._.._�.w�w�..ww......._..��w...__................................... Email: In consideration of the information contained in this petition as well as all supporting documentation, it is requested that approval be given to this request. The applicant is the owner or authorized representative of the owner of the property. The petitioner and the owner of the property grant employees of the Village of Mount Prospect and their agent's permission to enter on the property during reasonable hours for visual inspection of the subject property. I hereby affirm that all information provided herein and in all materials submitted in association with this application are true and acourat to the best of my knowledge. Applicant: _._.__... _ _...., Date: 8-9-2021 ............................................__._...._,__,,,,,,,, (Signature) Tom Lowe ._m ...... .... .._w_.....,_ _. . (Print or Type Name) If applicant is not property owner: I hereby designate the applicant to act as my agent for the purpose of seeking the zoning request(s) described in this application and the as ted o ing material. Property Owner: Date: ,..._ _.... _.�. ... ....._...........w... ( n turej ............ ............. (Print�or,Type Name)- ._ ... -__.----M.. ... ..... �........... 12 Affidavit of Ownership COUNTY OF COOK ST a - OF ILLINOIS ,under oath, state that I am (print name) [] the sole owner of the property an owner of the property an authorized officer for the owner of the property commonly described as— (property address and PIN) and that such property is owned by Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of NotaryPubl =-STATE L OSZ OF ILLINOISES:04/13/22 0 X -/7,- 10 0Z, -DOOU �0!� CoC� as of this date, (print name) W 13 ZONING REQUEST APPLICATION — STANDARDS 1. General Standards: a. Except as modified by and approved in the final planned unit development plan, the proposed development complies with the regulations of the district or districts in which it is to be located. Response: The proposed development plan complies with the regulations of the BSC, including use and bulk regulations. b. The principal use in the proposed planned unit development is consistent with the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan of the Village for the area containing the subject site. Response: The Village of Mount Prospect Comprehensive Plan adopted November 2017 identifies Downtown Redevelopment and Downtown Residential Density as Opportunities, and Limited Rentals Downtown as a Weakness according to the Village's SWOT analysis that was conducted. This proposal supports the Opportunity and reduces a Weakness identified in the SWOT. Other policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan suggest there is support for infill development or redevelopment of underutilized properties, which is exactly what the proposal accomplishes. The proposal also supports other policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan which encourage Transit Oriented Developments and emphasizes the continued revitalization of downtown Mount Prospect. This proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. c. The proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and is consistent with the purposes of this zoning ordinance. Response: The proposed planned unit development is in the public interest and consistent with the purposes of the zoning ordinance. The proposed use and bulk regulations conform with the 135C zoning district, and this proposal redevelops underutilized, vacant property in the core of Mount Prospect's downtown, and activates an important property. d. The streets have been designed to avoid: i. Inconvenient or unsafe access to the planned unit development; ii. Traffic congestion in the streets which adjoin the planned unit development; iii. An excessive burden on public parks, recreation areas, schools, and other public facilities which serve or are proposed to serve the planned unit development. Response: The exiting road network along Maple Street and Northwest Highway will not be adversely impacted and will not become inconvenient or unsafe. Curb �� m� ��" C . ITA 1. 14 cuts along Northwest Highway and Maple Street are being removed to actually improve and limit access to the proposed development. Existing access from Maple Street into the existing parking structure will be re -utilized. No new vehicular access is proposed. Enhanced pedestrian access and a widening of public sidewalks is proposed, improving upon the existing condition of pedestrian access adjacent to the property. 2. Standards For Planned Unit Developments With Other Exceptions: The Village Board may approve planned unit developments which do not comply with the requirements of the underlying zoning district's regulations governing lot area, lot width, bulk regulations, parking and sign regulations, or which require modification of the subdivision design standards when such approval is necessary to achieve the objectives of the proposed planned unit development, but only when the Board finds such exceptions are consistent with the following standards: a. Any reduction in the requirements of this chapter is in the public interest. Response: This proposal complies with the requirements of the 135C zoning district, including lot area, lot width, bulk regulations, and parking. The proposed signage plan included in this application will not adversely impact public interest and is designed to enhance the architectural design intent of the project. b. The proposed exceptions would not adversely impact the value or use of any other property. Response: The adjoining property and parcels in the vicinity of the property are commercial in nature and a multifamily residential apartment building with first floor commercial space is a compatible use. The significant investment in the site and proposed building use and design will enhance property values and be a significant improvement to an otherwise vacant and underutilized property. c. Such exceptions are solely for the purpose of promoting better development which will be beneficial to the residents or occupants of the planned unit development as well as those of the surrounding properties. Response: The proposed development will be a Class -A, new construction mixed- use asset that will be an enhancement to Mount Prospect's downtown. d. In residential planned unit developments the maximum number of dwelling units allowed per acre shall not exceed forty eight (48) units per acre for developments incorporating senior housing or assisted living facilities. Response: No senior housing or assisted living facilities are proposed. e. All buildings are to be located within the planned unit development in such a way as to dissipate any adverse impact on adjoining buildings and shall not invade the privacy of the occupants of such buildings and shall conform to the following: �� m: ��" CMANAGEMENT` . ITA 1, . E E T,. 15 L The front, side or rear yard setbacks on the perimeter of the development shall not be less than that required in the abutting zoning district(s) or the zoning district underlying the subject site, whichever is greater. Response: The proposed project complies with the underlying 135C zoning district. All transitional yards and transitional landscape yards of the underlying zoning district are complied with. Response: No transitional yards are required. iii. If required transitional yards and transitional landscape yards are not adequate to protect the privacy and enjoyment of property adjacent to the development, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall recommend either or both of the following requirements: 1. All structures located on the perimeter of the planned unit development must be set back by a distance sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of adjacent existing uses; Response: n/a 2. All structures located along the entire perimeter of the planned unit development must be permanently screened with sightproof screening in a manner which is sufficient to protect the privacy and amenity of adjacent existing uses. Response: n/a iv. The area of open space provided in a planned unit development shall be at least that required in the underlying zoning district. Response: The proposed project complies with the 135C zoning district. lIV �� M A X A G E M E N'J"' 1-1AMIETO'$ARTNER-S A ITA 1, ZONING REQUEST APPLICATION — STANDARDS Conditional Use - No conditional use shall be recommended for approval by the planning and zoning commission unless it finds: L That the establishment, maintenance, or operation of the conditional use will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare; RESPONSE: The proposed development will not be detrimental to, or endanger the public health, safety, morals, comfort, or general welfare. The project proposal is to develop an appropriately scaled multifamily residential apartment building with 3,500sf of retail/restaurant space located in downtown Mount Prospect in close proximity to where similar uses exist, and the proposed use is compatible with adjoining properties. 2. That the conditional use will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood in which it is to be located; RESPONSE: The proposed development will not be injurious to the uses and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the purposes already permitted, nor substantially diminish and impair property values within the neighborhood. The adjoining property and surrounding parcels in Block 56 are commercial in nature and a multifamily residential apartment building with first floor commercial space is a compatible use. The significant investment in the site and proposed building will enhance the property values and be an improvement to an otherwise vacant and underutilized property. 3. That the establishment of the conditional use will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding property for uses permitted in the district, RESPONSE: The proposed development will not impede the normal and orderly development and improvement of the surrounding properties for uses permitted in the district since the property is an in -fill location with surrounding properties being compatible uses. The proposed development will not affect or impact any adjoining property that undergoes a future redevelopment. 4. That adequate public utilities, access roads, drainage and/or necessary facilities have been or will be provided,• RESPONSE: The proposed development utilizes existing public utilities, roads, and drainage systems or will install new improvements to accommodate the project demand, as required. Preliminary engineering and architectural improvement plans depicting existing and proposed improvements accompany this application. 5. That adequate measures have been or will be taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public streets, �� m: ��" A . ITA 1, . E ET,. 17 RESPONSE: The application includes engineering plans that support adequate measures are being taken to provide ingress and egress so designed as to minimize traffic congestion in the public street. Access will be provided via existing access on Maple Street. Existing access on both Maple and NW Highway which was formerly used by fire apparatus will be removed. Access to the development requires approval by the Village of Mount Prospect engineering and pubic works department. 6. That the proposed conditional use is not contrary to the objectives of the current Comprehensive Plan for the Village; and RESPONSE: The Village of Mount Prospect Comprehensive Plan adopted November 2017 identifies Downtown Redevelopment and Downtown Residential Density as Opportunities, and Limited Rentals Downtown as a Weakness according to the Village's SWOT analysis that was conducted. This proposal supports the Opportunity and reduces a Weakness identified in the SWOT. Other policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan suggest there is support for infill development or redevelopment of underutilized properties, which is exactly what the proposal accomplishes. The proposal also supports other policies contained in the Comprehensive Plan which encourage Transit Oriented Developments and emphasizes the continued revitalization of downtown Mount Prospect. This proposal conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. 7. That the conditional use shall, in all other respects, conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located, except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified pursuant to the recommendations of the Planning & Zoning Commission. RESPONSE: Provided a conditional use/PUD is approved and granted, the use shall conform to the applicable regulations of the district in which it is located. The proposed Planned Unit Development sets forth the design and layout of the site and building improvements and no deviation to the plan will occur without the review and approval of the Village staff and the Planning and Zoning Commission. Zoning Map Amendment - When a map amendment is proposed the Planning & Zoning Commission shall make findings based upon the evidence presented to it in each specific case with respect to, but not limited to, the following matters: 1. Compatibility with existing uses in the general area of the Subject Property,• RESPONSE: The proposed residential development is compatible with the existing uses in the general area of the Subject Property. Surrounding properties in Block 56 are compatible in use, as are other properties in the downtown core area of Mount Prospect. 2. Compatibility with the zoning classification of properties within the general area of the Subject Property,• �� m: ��" A . ITA 1, 18 = 3 i� -' - - L 3 0 m 1331115 NOS113W3 H1f10S 133HIS 31dtlW H1f105 0 tea' H J Z WO > N W W W °C O a Ow LL = M J HARIFAA JPNING I "I "I I I I I C I 20 This report summarizes the methodologies, results, and findings of a traffic impact study conducted by Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona, Inc. (KLOA, Inc.) for a proposed residential development to be located at 100-112 E. Northwest Highway in Mount Prospect, Illinois. The site, which was previously occupied by Mount Prospect Police & Fire, is located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Northwest Highway with Maple Street. As proposed, the site will be redeveloped to provide a six -story building containing approximately 88 residential units (6 three-bedroom townhomes, 8 two-bedroom units, 61 one -bedroom units, and 13 studio units), approximately 3,500 square feet of ground floor retail, a 64 -space below grade parking garage, and a 45 -space surface parking lot. Furthermore, there will be 11 private parking garage spaces serving the townhome units. In addition Maple Street along the site frontage will be modified to provide approximately 10 diagonal parking spaces. Access to the 45 -space surface parking lot and 64 -space parking garage will be provided off Maple Street. The purpose of this study was to examine background traffic conditions, assess the impact that the proposed development will have on traffic conditions in the area, and determine if any roadway or access improvements are necessary to accommodate traffic generated. Figure 1 shows the location of the site in relation to the area roadway system. Figure 2 shows an aerial view of the site. The sections of this report present the following: • Existing roadway conditions • A description of the proposed development • Directional distribution of the development traffic Vehicle trip generation for the development Future traffic conditions including access to the development Traffic analyses for the weekday morning and evening peak hours Recommendations with respect to adequacy of the site access and adjacent roadway system • Evaluation of the adequacy of the parking supply Traffic capacity analyses were conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the following conditions: 1. Existing Conditions - Analyzes the capacity of the existing roadway system using existing peak hour traffic volumes in the surrounding area. 2. Projected Conditions — Analyzes the capacity of the future roadway system using the traffic volumes that include the background traffic volume, the traffic generated by other proposed developments within the area, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development. c,ti 'M/W� Pre toa�se, ��a s�'�'leti ial e.�,a r u� �t` 21 r -i �I ZrT� I� N .,. M - ("" DIY ,,l ld 48,1,1 P u F fYa',@p?u f`f I'dc� fv9Y Cf ^ry i AJ Y f f u' ,) 11 f 3i Y l �yw I011nm"I t I ,I urJ i� { L' µl 1� l /w) f71 6d.d (i T �p{r i IZ I Ll i i i Y....,=y 71 EArrill b No 11 lon r ....J Y f I I i ..�i_ ohH •l ].y y. rL If? 1�I FF I I' �11iL P,F,1 CN lwol -,W P1 r -i �I ZrT� I� N Aerial View of Site Figure 2 Proposed Residential Developinent "I'lourri, Provpccl, Illinois 3 23 The following provides a description of the geographical location of the site, physical characteristics of the area roadway system including lane usage and traffic control devices, and existing peak hour traffic volumes. Site Location The site, which was previously occupied by the Mount Prospect Police & Fire station, is bounded by Northwest Highway to the south, Maple Street to the east, and existing developments to the north and west in downtown Mount Prospect, Illinois. To the south of the site, running parallel to Northwest Highway, is the Union Pacific Railroad. Land uses in the vicinity of the site are primarily commercial and residential. Bordering the site to the west and north are retail establishments, associated parking lots, and Chase Bank. To the east is Tower Center, a single - story office building and the Mount Prospect water tower. To the south, between Northwest Highway and the railroad tracks is a commuter parking lot that is available for permit parking as well as daily paid use. The site is located approximately 160 feet north of the platform for the Mount Prospect Metra station. RMWIMEMKM The characteristics of the existing roadways near the proposed development are described below and illustrated in Figure 3. Main Street (IL Route 83) is a north -south, other principal arterial that generally provides two lanes in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its signalized intersection with Northwest Highway, Main Street provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane and a combined through/right-turn lane on both approaches. A high -visibility crosswalk is provided on the north leg of this intersection and a standard style crosswalk is provided on the south leg of this intersection. The pedestrian signal heads are not countdown signal heads. Main Street is under the jurisdiction of the Illinois Department of Transportation, is designated as a Strategic Regional Arterial (SRA) and carries an Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT) volume of approximately 13,800 vehicles north of Northwest Highway and 15,400 vehicles south of Northwest Highway (IDOT 2019)., Main Street has a posted speed limit of 30 miles per hour. Northwest Highway (US 14) is a northwest -southeast, minor arterial that generally provides two lanes in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its signalized intersection with Main Street, Northwest Highway provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane and a combined through/right-turn lane on both approaches. Standard -style crosswalks are provided on the east and west legs of this intersection. At its unsignalized intersection with Maple Street, Northwest Highway provides an exclusive left -turn lane, a through lane, and a combined through/right-turn lane on the southeast -bound approach. On the northwest -bound approach, Northwest Highway provides a combined left-turn/through lane and a combined through/right-turn lane. The southeast approach provides a standard crosswalk. Two-hour parking is provided on the north side of the roadway, west of Maple Street and parking is prohibited on the south side of the road. °d"a➢ud�'�r"fad Wsida;ntr'/ 24 F - 0 F 0 z Y J a co w 0 J Q 2 0 U LU Z ~ ~ Z U' H Z (> U J a Z Y _Z 0 00 J U 0 Y O B In W U3 < W LL 0_ Q c D i CL Z w a a 0 w= U U Q (=^^ J U) U N Z m U) 2 u LAJ 5► ��4 N zw O�2 M rLU r . M 00 - 0 +� O L) 3: o` 0 0 a LL W LU m= M C N 6 = CD N Q U p... J z MND Iz I"„ N Y O � W co d �w Q 0 Q J ZZ a '0��C� APLE ® N REET (�� (G_] Y J a co w 0 J Q 2 0 U LU Z ~ ~ Z U' H Z (> U J a Z Y _Z 0 00 J U 0 Y O B In W U3 < W LL 0_ Q c D i CL Z w a a 0 w= U U Q (=^^ J U) U N Z m U) 2 U O I Lo U (B L m '91 3 Ln �<v w u LAJ 5► ��4 N M � �W ��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w�� r . M 00 - 0 +� O REET o` 0 0 a LL = M C N 6 N N Q U p... J z G: Iz I"„ N Y O � U O I Lo U (B L m '91 3 Ln �<v w u LAJ 5► ��4 AIN�� W ��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w��w�� r . M 00 - 0 +� O REET � z 0 �� .� LD N (n C I. N Q U p... Ip.... 'a �.�.�.�. C - Q Iz I"„ ", Q 0 Q a '0��C� Northwest Highway is under the jurisdiction of IDOT and carries an AADT volume of 9,900 vehicles west of Main Street and 10,300 vehicles east of Main Street (IDOT 2019). The posted speed limit along Northwest Highway is 30 miles per hour. Maple Street is a north -south local road that generally provides one lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its two-way stop sign controlled intersection with Northwest Highway, Maple Street provides a combined left-turn/through/right-turn lane and a standard -style crosswalk. The south leg of the intersection serves the Mount Prospect Metra Station East Lot which provides one inbound lane and one outbound lane. At its all -way stop sign controlled intersection with Busse Avenue, Maple Street provides a combined left-turn/through/right-turn lane on both the northbound and southbound approaches. Both approaches are under stop sign control and provide standard -style crosswalks. On the west side of Maple Street, parking is restricted to a 2 -hour time limit between 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M. and parking is prohibited on the east side of the roadway. Maple Street is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Busse Avenue is an east -west local road that provides one lane in each direction in the vicinity of the site. At its all -way stop sign controlled intersection with Maple Street, Busse Avenue provides a combined left-tui-n/through/right-tum lane and standard style crosswalks. The east leg features a school zone speed limit of 20 miles per hour on school days when children are present. The south side of the west leg of the intersection allows no parking at any time. The south side of the east leg of the intersection does not allow parking 7:00 A.M-6:00 P.M. during the weekdays. Two-hour parking is generally provided on the north side of the roadway. Busse Avenue is under the jurisdiction of the Village of Mount Prospect and has a posted speed limit of 25 miles per hour. Evergreen Avenue is an east -west roadway that terminates approximately 170 feet to the east of Maple Street. Evergreen Avenue has recently been reconstructed to remove the existing perpendicular parking stalls on the south side of the roadway and will provide two drive-through lanes for ATM access. At its intersection with Maple Street, Evergreen Avenue provides a shared left-turn/right-turn lane under stop sign control. Proposecl sae s icle ntia l,,drain nt Public Transportation The area is served by two modes of public transportation: Metra commuter rail and the Pace Bus system. All public transportation in the immediate vicinity of the site arrives within a block of the Mount Prospect Metra station. The station features a Park -N -Ride lot, bike racks, and a station building. The Park -N -Ride lot consists of two main sections: a west lot and an east lot, both located south of Northwest Highway. The station building is located approximately 415 feet southwest of the site. The following summarizes the public transportation services provided to the area: The Mount Prospect Metra station provides daily rail service on the Union Pacific - Northwest (UP -NW) line between Union Station in Chicago and Harvard, Illinois, with weekday rush hour service along a branch to McHenry, Illinois. Due to COVID-19, Metra is currently utilizing alternate schedules on its lines. As of July 2021, the UP -NW line provides 22 inbound trains and 23 outbound trains on weekdays. The first inbound train departs the Crystal Lake Metra station in Crystal Lake, Illinois at 4:47 A.M., with the last train departing for Chicago from Harvard at 8:50 P.M. The first outbound train departs Chicago's Union Station at 5:55 A.M. with the last train departing at 12:35 A.M. the next day. Approximately two inbound and one outbound train cross Main Street (IL Route 83) during the morning peals hour. Approximately one inbound and two outbound trains cross Main Street during the evening peak hour. The gates at the train tracks remain closed for approximately 70 seconds for an inbound train and approximately 120 seconds for an outbound train. • Pace Bus Route 234 — Wheeling -Des Plaines runs from Des Plaines to Wheeling, with rush hour service to Buffalo Grove. This line provides weekday service between the Des Plaines Metra Station and Strong/Milwaukee in Wheeling, with rush hour service extending to the Buffalo Grove Transportation Center in Buffalo Grove. The nearest bus stops to the site are located on Northwest Highway. A sheltered bus stop is located on the north side of Northwest Highway, west of Maple Street at the far southwest corner of the site; this stop provides northbound service. Another sheltered bus stop is located on the south side of Northwest Highway, west of Maple Street, on the same parcel of land as the Mount Prospect Metra station building; this stop provides southbound service to Des Plaines. There are sidewalks in the vicinity of the site providing pedestrian access throughout the area. KLOA, Inc. obtained crash data from IDOT for the most recent past five years available (2016 to 2020) for the intersections of Northwest Highway with Main Street, Maple Street with Northwest Highway, and Maple Street with Busse Avenue. A review of the crash data indicated that no fatalities were reported at any of the intersections'. Tables 1 through 3 summarize the crash data. I IDOT DISCLAIMER: The motor vehicle crash data referenced herein was provided by the Illinois Department of Transportation. The author is responsible for any data analyses and conclusions drawn. 27 Table I NORTHWEST HIGHWAY WITH MAIN STREET — CRASH SUMMARY Table 2 MAPLE STREET WITH NORTHWEST HIGHWAY — CRASH SUMMARY Year Angle Object Type of Rear End Crash Frequency Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2016 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 2017 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2018 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2019 0 2 0 0 1 0 3 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 0 3 1 0 2 1 6 Average/Year <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 1.2 pr� �P� o'c,d 1?udt](Idial 14ouril 111illiois 8 q-1 Table 3 MAPLE STREET WITH BUSSE AVENUE — CRASH SUMMARY Year Angle Object Type of Rear End •q Sideswipe Turning Other Total 2016 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 2017 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2018 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2019 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2020 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 Average/Year <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Mount Prospect Downtown I"ran s roftation. Study. The Village of Mount Prospect commissioned a transportation study of the downtown area in 2018, the results of which are summarized in the Mount Prospect Downtown Transportation Study prepared by Sam Schwartz Consulting dated October 15, 2018. In this study, it was identified that congestion of traffic within the downtown area was primarily attributed to the at -grade rail crossings at IL Route 83 and Emerson Street, which are regularly blocked by Metra commuter trains during the peak periods. When an inbound or outbound train is at the Mount Prospect station, crossing gates are down at both intersections. This study also identified several area improvements to significantly improve the operations of the downtown area. These improvements ranged from short term improvements such as updating pedestrian facilities/signal equipment to long term infrastructure improvements such as new railroad crossings and relocation of the train station and platforms. Existing Traffic Volumes Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, traffic volumes in the study area do not reflect normal or typical conditions. As such, in order to determine current traffic conditions in the vicinity of the site, KLOA, Inc. utilized previous peak period traffic counts conducted in 2017 at the intersection of Main Street with Northwest Highway. These counts were adjusted to reflect 2021 traffic conditions by applying a regional growth factor determined based on traffic projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) as discussed later in the report. Additional counts were conducted by KLOA, Inc. using Miovision Video Scout Collection Units on Wednesday, July 28, 2021, during the weekday morning (7:00 to 9:00 A.M.) and weekday evening (4:00 to 6:00 P.M.) peak periods at the following intersections: Maple Street with Northwest Highway Maple Street with Busse Avenue Based on the turning movement count data, it was determined that the weekday morning peak hour generally occurs between 8:00 and 9:00 A.M., and that the weekday evening peak hour generally occurs between 4:30 and 5:30 P.M. These two respective peak hours will be used for the traffic capacity analyses presented later in this report. The counts at the intersection of Main Street with Northwest Highway conducted in 2017 were 35 percent higher during the weekday morning peak hour and 15 percent higher during the weekday evening peak hour than those conducted in 2021. Therefore, the 2021 traffic counts were increased by 35 percent during the weekday morning peak hour and by 15 percent during the weekday evening peak hour. Figure 4 shows the adjusted Year 2021 base peak hour traffic volumes. The traffic count summary sheets are included in the Appendix. ,� r� � l, 'r�� (`finlllilicds 10 RT11 5 (7) 28 (20) 8 (15) P .e. to 4 00 00 U) (1) E 2 O U 4- 4- C) - 4 - O N (6 N i (d U + O C � N } — _0 ( _ — N — (n E O Q U O N -0 N U) N > O U) N L cl O +� T M To properly evaluate future traffic conditions in the surrounding area, it was necessary to determine the traffic characteristics of the proposed development, including the directional distribution and volumes of traffic that it will generate. r � . As proposed, the site will be redeveloped to provide a six -story building containing approximately 88 apartment units (six three-bedroom townhomes, eight two-bedroom units, 61 one -bedroom units, and 13 studio units), approximately 3,500 square feet of ground floor retail, a 64 -space lower -level parking garage, a 45 -space surface parking lot, and 11 private garage spaces for a total of 120 spaces. In addition, 10 diagonal spaces will be provided on the west side of Maple Street along the site frontage to be utilized by the proposed retail. Access to the residential parking will be provided off Maple Street via two access drives: one for the surface lot and one for the below grade parking garage. The surface lot drive will be located approximately 260 feet north of Northwest Highway and the parking garage drive will be located approximately 350 feet north of Northwest Highway. A second existing drive providing access to the surface lot will be eliminated to allow for additional parking spaces. The existing access drive on Northwest Highway that previously served the fire station as well as the diagonal striping should be removed. It should be noted that additional parking will be available for the retail customers in the commuter lot on weekday evenings and on weekends A copy of the preliminary site plan depicting the proposed development is included in the Appendix. Proposed Pedestrian Access Pedestrian access to the proposed residential building will be provided via a lobby located on the south side of the building facing Northwest Highway and in the rear of the building. The six townhome units will each have their own street -level entrances. Additionally, pedestrian access to the retail space will be provided off Maple Street. Proposed Vehicle Access Access to the proposed 64 -space lower -level parking garage will be provided via a ramped driveway intersecting Maple Street approximately 350 feet north of Northwest Highway. Visual warning devices should be provided at the garage exit. The 45 -space surface parking lot and 11 private garage spaces will be accessed via a driveway on Maple Street approximately 260 feet north of Northwest Highway. This access drive will provide one inbound and one outbound lane. The outbound movements should be under stop sign control. Vlouw, Pro,vpeel, fflincds 12 X1WGFAOqrh' W The directions from which residents and visitors of the development will approach and depart the site were estimated based on existing travel patterns, as determined from the traffic counts. Figure 5 illustrates the directional distribution of the traffic to be generated by the proposed development. Iffiffalff V The vehicle trip generation for the overall development was calculated using data published in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition. The location of the site in close proximity to downtown Mount Prospect and to the Metra train station and other modes of transportation (i.e. car sharing facilities) fits the criterion of a Transit Oriented Development (TOD) that results in less dependence on automobile use. Based on a review of the census data, approximately 10 percent of the residents currently use public transportation. As such, a 10 percent reduction factor was applied to the estimated vehicle traffic to be generated by the residential use. A copy of the census data is included in the Appendix. For the retail use and in order to reflect the mixed-use nature of the development, its synergy with downtown Mount Prospect and internal capture, the estimated trips were reduced by 25 percent. Table 4 shows the estimated vehicle trip generation for the weekday morning, weekday evening as well as daily traffic. Copies of the ITE trip generation worksheets are included in the Appendix. Table 4 ESTIMATED PEAK HOUR VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION ITE Use Code Weekday Morning Peak Hour Out Total Weekday In Peak Out Evening Hour Total DailyLand Traffic Apartments 221 8 24 32 20 13 33 478 (88 units) -10 Percent Reduction] _1 -2 -3 -2 -1 -3 -48 Subtotal 7 22 29 18 12 30 430 Retail 820 2 1 3 6 7 13 132 (3,500 sf) - 25 Percent Reduction _1 -0 -1 -2 -2 -4 -33 Subtotal 1 1 2 4 5 9 99 Total 8 23 31 22 17 39 529 1- Reduction applied due to the proximity of the site to public transportation 2- Reduction applied due to the proximity of the site to downtown and internal capture X1WGFA fir SVC � `finlllincds 130qrh' RTC] n C N } - N (D E N Q O 0 N N > U) N Rm O a LO ai LL T M The total projected traffic volumes include the existing traffic volumes, increase in background traffic due to growth, and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed subject development. The estimated peak hour traffic volumes that will be generated by the proposed development were assigned to the roadway system in accordance with the previously described directional distribution. Figure 6 illustrates the assignment of the vehicle traffic volumes to be generated by the proposed development. It should be noted that the proposed parking onsite will be for the use by future residential. As such, only the traffic generated by the residential uses was assigned to the proposed access drives. M The base traffic volumes (Figure 4) were increased by a regional growth factor to account for the increase in existing traffic related to regional growth in the area (i.e., not attributable to any particular planned development). Based on 2050 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) projections provided by the Chicago Metropolitan Agency for Planning (CMAP) in a letter dated August 9, 2021, the existing traffic volumes were increased by an annually compounded growth rate for six years (one-year buildout plus five years) totaling 5.0 percent to represent Year 2027 total projected conditions. Additionally, the Year 2027 background traffic conditions include the traffic to be generated by the following developments: The Maple Street Lofts mixed-use development (which is under construction) located at the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maple Street with Prospect Avenue. The existing 97 -unit apartment building located at the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Main Street and Central Road. The traffic to be generated by this apartment building was included at full occupancy. • The 73 -unit apartment building (which is under construction) located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Northwest Highway with Main Street. • Prospect Place, an 80 -unit five -story mixed-use apartment building proposed to be located at the northwest corner of Prospect Avenue with Evergreen Avenue. A copy of the CMAP 2050 projections letter is included in the Appendix. The total projected traffic volumes include the Year 2027 background traffic volumes and the traffic estimated to be generated by the proposed development (Figure 6). Figure 7 shows the Year 2027 total projected traffic volumes. Vlouw, Pro,vpeel, fllincds 15 XIWOA41%" 35 X3(10) r 3 (8) 11 (5) �i �► + O ._ LD O E U O N 0 N U) N > O U) L cl 0 +� F - 0 0 z 5(7)� 29 (25) 8 (16) L 2 (19) 14 (40) r 17 01) 35 (56) r 3 (8) �4(45)) � o �o O� 33 (4 7) r 3 (9) LU ro LUU)LUU) LU rU U)U Wa J ax Qr O U) � r£J 0 o i2 'PA - � O 52 (25) 430 (51 0) r 51 (59) �� wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww 14 (29) 379 (577) 60 (8) � �O Al a � 0 0 0 0 O M 00 0 0 0 W W z w a 0- Lu Q J i � 06 00 a� o` LL 0 a = M C N 6 N J z 0 0 Y 0 c (D LD (_ aD — (n E _ O Q U O U � U) a>>O U) (1) , 000- clO ti M The following provides an evaluation conducted for the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The analysis includes conducting capacity analyses to determine how well the roadway system and access drives are projected to operate and whether any roadway improvements or modifications are required. Roadway and adjacent or nearby intersection analyses were performed for the weekday morning and evening peak hours for the existing (Year 2021) and future projected (Year 2027) traffic volumes. The traffic analyses were performed using the methodologies outlined in the Transportation Research Board's Highway Capacity Manual (HCM), 6th Edition and analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffrc 11 software. The analysis for the traffic -signal controlled intersections were accomplished using actual cycle lengths, phasings, and offsets to detennine the average overall vehicle delay and levels of service. The analyses for the unsignalized intersections determine the average control delay to vehicles at an intersection. Control delay is the elapsed time from a vehicle joining the queue at a stop sign (includes the time required to decelerate to a stop) until its departure from the stop sign and resumption of free flow speed. The methodology analyzes each intersection approach controlled by a stop sign and considers traffic volumes on all approaches and lane characteristics. The ability of an intersection to accommodate traffic flow is expressed in terms of level of service, which is assigned a letter from A to F based on the average control delay experienced by vehicles passing through the intersection. The Highway Capacity Manual definitions for levels of service and the corresponding control delay for signalized intersections and unsignalized intersections are included in the Appendix of this report. Summaries of the traffic analysis results showing the level of service and overall intersection delay (measured in seconds) for the existing and Year 2027 total projected conditions are presented in Tables 5 through 7. A discussion of the intersections follows. Summary sheets for the capacity analyses are included in the Appendix. Proposed Residential Development Mount Prospect, Illinois 18 38 rn M Flo Clm Qac Q� • W W W W I W I W I W I W w� w w� w� I W I W I W I W N �N 00 oc 00 00 N N A/ •� •11 py I�1 3 � �'y I� Hwy �1 nay l �1 11 w ;� 3w� a a a a liul ST at .1 XI I rn M Table 6 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — EXISTING CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Intersection Weekday Morning Peak LOS Hour Delay Weekday Evening Peak LOS Hour Delay Maple Street with Northwest Highway • Northbound Approach A 0.0 C 17.9 • Southbound Approach B 14.5 C 15.1 • Eastbound Left Turn A 9.0 A 8.6 • Westbound Left Turn A 8.2 A 8.2 Maple Street with Busse Avenue 0 Overall A 7.5 A 7.3 0 Eastbound Approach A 7.3 A 7.5 0 Westbound Approach A 7.6 A 7.3 0 Northbound Approach A 7.6 A 7.5 0 Southbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.1 LOS = Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Pn �p� Rc,sit](Ii lia I De eta -.Wmmm� 14ouril fllillois 20 X1WGFA0q[x\' CU Table 7 CAPACITY ANALYSIS RESULTS — TOTAL PROJECTED CONDITIONS - UNSIGNALIZED Maple Street with Northwest Highway • Northbound Approach A 0.0 C 19.7 • Southbound Approach C 15.1 C 16.4 • Eastbound Left Turn A 9.1 A 8.8 • Westbound Left Turn A 8.3 A 8.2 Maple Street with Busse Avenue • Overall A 7.5 A 7.4 • Eastbound Approach A 7.3 A 7.5 • Westbound Approach A 7.7 A 7.4 • Northbound Approach A 7.6 A 7.5 • Southbound Approach A 7.5 A 7.2 Maple Street with Garage Access Drive • Eastbound Approach A 8.7 A 8.6 • Northbound Left Turn A 7.3 A 7.3 Maple Street with Surface Lot Access Drive • Eastbound Approach A 8.7 A 8.6 • Northbound Left Turn A 7.4 A 7.3 LOS — Level of Service Delay is measured in seconds. Aloura Illinois 21 °dpa ro st�r, lia I .ii(h,)j-mnc, Fit. 41 Discussion and Recommendations The following summarizes how the intersections are projected to operate and identifies any roadway and traffic control improvements necessary to accommodate the development traffic. Main Street with Northwest Highway The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at Level of Service (LOS) D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The westbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning and weekday evening peak hours. In addition, the northbound and southbound approaches currently operate at LOS E during both peak hours, and the eastbound approach currently operates at LOS B during both peak hours. Under 2027 total projected conditions, overall this intersection will continue to operate at LOS D during the weekday morning and evening peak hours with increases in delay of less than two seconds over existing conditions. All approaches will continue to operate at the same levels of service during both peak hours with increases in delay of less than three seconds. Furthermore, the proposed development is projected to increase the volume of traffic traversing this intersection by less than three percent during both peak hours. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development and no roadway improvements and/or traffic control modifications are required. Maple Street with Northwest Highway The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the southbound approach currently operates at LOS B during the weekday morning peak hour and at LOS C during the weekday evening peak hour. The northbound approach, from the Metra east lot, operates at LOS A during the weekday morning peak hour and at LOS C during the weekday evening peak hour. In addition, the eastbound and westbound left -turn movements operate at LOS A during both the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Under Year 2027 total projected conditions, the southbound approach is projected to operate at LOS C during both the weekday morning and evening peak hours, with increases in delay of less than two seconds. The northbound approach is projected to operate at LOS C during both the weekday morning and evening peak hours. In addition, the eastbound and westbound left -turn movements are projected to continue operating at LOS A during both the weekday morning and evening peak hours. 95th percentile queues for all approaches and movements are projected to be one to two vehicles during both peak hours. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development. In order to improve pedestrian safety, it is recommended that a high -visibility crosswalk be restriped on the west leg of the intersection. "I'loura, Illinois 22 °�pl �st�d Re,,dclenlial .iia lol-n c't,. 42 The results of the capacity analysis indicate that overall this intersection currently operates at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. All approaches currently operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. Under Year 2027 total projected conditions, the intersection is projected to continue operating at LOS A with increases in delays of less than one second. All approaches are also projected to continue operating at LOS A. 95th percentile queues for all approaches are projected to be one to two vehicles during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. As such, this intersection has sufficient reserve capacity to accommodate the traffic projected to be generated by the development. Maple Street with Garage Access Drive The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound approach is projected to operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. It is projected that the northbound left -turn movement will operate at LOS A during the peak hours. 95th percentile queues are to be one to two vehicles during the peak hours. As such, the proposed access is projected to have sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic projected by the generated development. Maple Street with Surface Lot Access Drive The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the eastbound approach is projected to operate at LOS A during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. It is projected that the northbound left -turn movement will operate at LOS A during the peak hours. 95th percentile queues are to be one to two vehicles during the peak hours. As such, the proposed access is projected to have sufficient capacity to accommodate the traffic projected by the generated development. As previously indicated, the proposed development will have approximately 88 apartment units (6 three-bedroom townhome units, 8 two-bedroom units, 61 one -bedroom units, and 13 studio units), an approximate 3,500 square feet of ground floor retail, and will provide a total of 120 on-site residential parking spaces. In addition, 10 diagonal parking spaces will be added on the west side of Maple Street. It should be noted that retail customers will be expected to utilize these diagonal spaces and other on -street parking spaces in the vicinity, as well as the commuter lot on weekday evenings and on weekends. Therefore, the proposed development will provide a total of 120 parking spaces for residential uses, at a ratio of 1.36 spaces per unit, and will provide 108 bedrooms, at a ratio of 1.11 spaces per bedroom. In order to determine the adequacy of the proposed parking supply, the parking demand was estimated based on the Village of Mount Prospect Code, the parking rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Parking Generation Manual, 5th Edition and a comparison with other similar developments. riFiourl, llroqwcl, Illinois 23 43 Studio units (13 units) o 13 parking spaces (ratio of one parking space per dwelling unit) One -bedroom units (61 units) o 61 parking spaces (ratio of one parking space per dwelling unit) i Two-bedroom units (8 units) o 12 parking spaces (ratio of 1.5 parking space per dwelling unit) Three-bedroom townhome units (6 units) o 12 parking spaces (ratio of two parking spaces per dwelling unit) Based on the above and the requirements of the Village of Mount Prospect, this translates into 99 parking spaces, which results in a surplus of 22 parking spaces. Residential Use (Multifamily Housing Mid -Rise less than 0.5 mile to rail transit — Land Use Code 221): o 99 parking spaces (ratio of 1.12 spaces per dwelling unit) Based on the above and the rates published in the ITE Parking Generation Manual, this translates into 99 parking spaces, which results in a surplus of 21 parking spaces. Therefore, the proposed parking supply of 120 parking spaces exceeds ITE's requirements of 99 parking spaces. Pay -king Ratios of Similar Developments As previously indicated, the proposed development will provide a total of 120 parking spaces for residential uses, at a ratio of 1.3 spaces per unit, and will provide 108 bedrooms, at a ratio of 1.1 spaces per bedroom. The proposed parking supply of 1.3 spaces per unit is consistent with some of the other apartment developments (built or planned) in the Chicago area listed in Table A in the Appendix and exceeds the average ratio of 1.22 spaces per unit. Alount Illinois 24 44 Based on the preceding analyses and recommendations, the following conclusions have been made: The volume of vehicular traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development will be reduced due to the proximity of the development to the Mount Prospect Metra train station, which qualifies the development as a Transit Oriented Design. The results of the capacity analysis indicate that the proposed development traffic will not have a significant impact on the area roadways. The development -generated traffic will only add approximately three percent to the total traffic projected to be traversing the intersection of Main Street with Northwest Highway during the weekday morning and evening peak hours. The proposed access drives will be adequate in accommodating the traffic projected to be generated by the proposed development and will ensure that a flexible access system is provided. Visual warning devices should be provided at the garage exit on Maple Street. • The proposed parking that will be provided on site for the future residents in combination with the on -street parking and adjacent commuter lot for retail customers will ensure that adequate parking is provided to accommodate its projected parking demand. The existing access drive and diagonal striping on Northwest Highway that previously served the fire station should be removed. It is recommended that a high -visibility crosswalk be provided on the west leg of Northwest Highway at its intersection with Maple Street. Proo Residential AIrwrir, Pro,vpecl, Illinois 25 45 Appendix Traffic Count Summary Sheets Site Plan CMAP 2050 Projection Letter Census Data Level of Service Criteria Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Parking Ratios of Similar Developments E, Traffic Count Summary Sheets 47 48 H N O r N W m N V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O N O N0 Q H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mN N O ED W h " I '.I i,;g� w w .3 a N N > m d N M co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 00 m co N r— co N N O F . O V.... V (O O� N O O O O O O O O O O m� o _ O M o 0 0 0 0 p "�w� c C) J N O N N O O M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 'p OJ pj O D O C CY) W co U (n Cn d F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 o c Q V M M V N (O I� ti N O O O O O O O O O O M M h o 00 O Q C H N a m Q � m 'o a s m O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 . N o D7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0^�� C C C, 0 V N O O N N N V V 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 O 0 0 p O G C) C o� Y y f) CO�1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 o c E 6 C 0 N O N > Q F N W M V N r W _ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 0 O O O rn cn Q O cGi �Lr) L 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O Mc� Lq M O O 00 O C o r c N O >d m H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO 6 N y o6 Q� O O O O O O J O N V O O N M Ip 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a7 V h N O c O OO O Q (� 'N h � i„Y L, U (,✓ Ll 11 S"ICY O w O O w w w w w w w a h O h � m w F V M M M N N CO M V N M N N N N r m O O O O O O N J F O 0 0 0 O 0 N 0 O 0 0 O 0 0 N 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O O 0 p p 0 O 0 O 0 O p O O C C 2 o in o in 2 o in o in >• w o in o � >. o ip o M u� 2 O m m � w m a�� m Nr r r r O O W O O O m V V V V O �p �p �p 6 �f1 O 2 p 49 50 51 En 3 7 7 \ \ \\ !;{n )\kZ . 5-:: „ 77/,g=)=2:j=;. )C) emmIL : _ Iq ?j\2g3. 00 c E -B = - o 0\ � - D \ / } CO75 Eq 6 !I r , �/� 2$ % _.�.:: .............©\ 2 / �LO ) )} ' \ , c5 6 \ \\\\�\��\�\\ \\�\ \\ 51 a H 0 0 0 0 0 0 0d d o o N - � o N En Q H N 0 0 0 0 0 o p o o 0 0 0 0 CO W � .3 O Q N N o ° 00co � s 1- co N N O F 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o o E Owl o J O O O O O p 0 O O O O cQ� T � O � = M j UU)Cnd D 0 o om o 0 a C m O 0 m 'o � a C g o 0 Ch m z L o 0 0 0 0 0 o p o 0 0 0 0 � o CO F O (� �O U +-' m o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o civ N'm � Y Q. ? 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 o o Q o co`1a p � Q F Q o .6.,0 " O. �( > d M J C CD N E r O W N o Ym i:�- O- Q Q ofco y a uJ � � o L O O O � � � h a O O O •- � � h 'o w � o o m w w F J 0 0 6 0 6 6 0 4 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 o o � O O a @r N U d (n~ Q~ U m N d N ¢ m 52 Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Warm and Dry Maple St and Busse Ave Tuesday August 3, 2021 Passenger Vehicles Only TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Counts: All Vehicles - by Mvmt Intersection # 5 maple/busse/cars Begin Time 1600 1615 1630 1645 1700 1715 1730 1745 Total N -Approach RT TH LT 5 27 4 3 19 1 4 16 3 1 30 2 4 28 0 4 19 1 1 20 0 3 14 0 25 173 11 E -Approach RT TH LT 2 0 5 4 0 2 3 0 3 0 3 6 1 0 5 2 0 5 3 1 6 2 2 3 17 6 35 S -Approach RT TH LT 7 14 1 6 9 0 7 13 4 3 13 2 1 17 2 3 20 1 3 11 1 3 13 0 33 110 11 W -Approach RT TH LT 1 2 1 0 2 2 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 0 5 1 3 5 0 3 1 0 0 3 4 11 20 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Counts: All Vehicles - Totals Intersection # 5 maple/busse/cars Begin Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- Approach Totals Exit Totals Time ----------------------------------- N E S W N ---------------------------- E S W 1600 36 7 22 4 17 13 33 6 1615 23 6 15 4 15 9 21 3 1630 23 6 24 0 16 10 19 8 1645 33 9 18 5 16 6 37 6 1700 32 6 20 6 23 1 34 6 1715 24 7 24 9 27 7 25 5 1730 21 10 15 4 15 6 26 3 1745 ----------------------------------- 17 7 16 3 18 ---------------------------- 3 17 5 ----------------------------------- Total 209 58 154 35 ---------------------------- 147 55 212 42 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Flow Rates: by Movement 08/04/21 12:50:11 Int Total 69 48 53 65 64 64 50 43 456 Int Total 69 48 53 65 64 64 50 43 456 '--*W Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 5 maple/busse/cars Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- N -Approach E -Approach S -Approach W -Approach Int Time ----- RT -------------- TH LT RT TH LT -------------- RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ----- 1600 -------------- 20 108 16 -------------- 8 0 20 -------------- 28 56 4 -------------- 4 8 4 ----- 276 1615 12 76 4 16 0 8 24 36 0 0 8 8 192 1630 16 64 12 12 0 12 28 52 16 0 0 0 212 1645 4 120 8 0 12 24 12 52 8 4 4 12 260 1700 16 112 0 4 0 20 4 68 8 4 0 20 256 1715 16 76 4 8 0 20 12 80 4 4 12 20 256 1730 4 80 0 12 4 24 12 44 4 0 12 4 200 1745 ----- ----- 12 -------------- -------------- 56 0 8 8 12 -------------- -------------- 12 -------------- -------------- 52 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 12 172 ----- ----- '--*W Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Warm and Dry 08/04/21 Maple St and Busse Ave 12:50:11 Tuesday August 3, 2021 Passenger Vehicles Only TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Flow Rates: Appr/Exit Totals 54 Intersection # 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- maple/busse/cars Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----- N ------------------------------ E S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----- 1600 ------------------------------ 144 28 ------------------------------ 88 16 68 52 132 24 ----- 276 1615 92 24 60 16 60 36 84 12 192 1630 92 24 96 0 64 40 76 32 212 1645 132 36 72 20 64 24 148 24 260 1700 128 24 80 24 92 4 136 24 256 1715 96 28 96 36 108 28 100 20 256 1730 84 40 60 16 60 24 104 12 200 1745 ----- ----- 68 ------------------------------ 28 64 12 ------------------------------ 72 12 68 20 172 ----- ----- ------------------------------ ------------------------------ TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: by Movement Intersection # 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- maple/busse/cars Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- N -Approach E -Approach S -Approach W -Approach Int Time ----- RT TH -------------- LT -------------- RT TH LT RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ----- 1600 -------------- 13 92 -------------- 10 -------------- 9 3 16 23 49 7 -------------- 2 5 6 ----- 235 1615 12 93 6 8 3 16 17 52 8 2 3 10 230 1630 13 93 6 6 3 19 14 63 9 3 4 13 246 1645 10 97 3 6 4 22 10 61 6 3 7 14 243 1700 12 81 1 8 3 19 10 61 4 2 6 14 221 1715 8 53 1 7 3 14 9 44 2 1 6 9 157* 1730 4 34 0 5 3 9 6 24 1 0 3 4 93* 1745 ----- ----- 3 14 -------------- 0 -------------- 2 2 3 3 -------------- -------------- 13 0 0 -------------- 0 3 43* ----- ----- -------------- -------------- -------------- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 5 -------------------------------------------------------------- maple/busse/cars Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----- N ------------------------------ E S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----- 1600 ------------------------------ 115 28 ------------------------------ 79 13 64 38 110 23 ----- 235 1615 111 27 77 15 70 26 111 23 230 1630 112 28 86 20 82 24 115 25 246 1645 110 32 77 24 81 20 122 20 243 1700 94 30 75 22 83 17 102 19 221 1715 62 24 55 16 60 16 68 13 157* 1730 38 17 31 7 33 9 43 8 93* 1745 17 7 16 3 18 3 17 5 43* 54 Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Warm and Dry Maple St and Busse Ave Tuesday August 3, 2021 Single Unit Trucks Only TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Counts: All Vehicles - by Mvmt Intersection # 6 maple/busse/single Begin Time 1600 1615 1630 1645 1700 1715 1730 1745 Total N -Approach RT TH LT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 E -Approach RT TH LT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S -Approach RT TH LT 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 W -Approach RT TH LT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Counts: All Vehicles - Totals Intersection # 6 maple/busse/single Begin Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- Approach Totals Exit Totals Time ----------------------------------- N E S W ---------------------------- N E S W 1600 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1615 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 1630 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1645 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1715 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 1 1730 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1745 ----------------------------------- 0 0 0 0 ---------------------------- 0 0 0 0 ----------------------------------- Total 3 0 2 ---------------------------- 1 2 1 1 2 TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Flow Rates: by Movement 08/04/21 12:52:51 Int Total 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 Int Total 1 1 0 1 0 2 1 0 55 Intersection -------------------------------------------------------------- # 6 maple/busse/single Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- N -Approach E -Approach S -Approach W -Approach Int Time ----- RT TH -------------- LT RT TH LT -------------- RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ----- 1600 -------------- 0 0 4 -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 4 1615 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 4 1630 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1645 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1715 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 4 8 1730 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 1745 ----- ----- 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- -------------- 0 0 0 ----- ----- 55 Mt. Prospect, IL Weather: Warm and Dry 08/04/21 Maple St and Busse Ave 12:52:51 Tuesday August 3, 2021 Single Unit Trucks Only TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 15 -Minute Flow Rates: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 6 -------------------------------------------------------------- maple/busse/single Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----- N E ------------------------------ S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----- 1600 ------------------------------ 4 0 0 0 ------------------------------ 0 4 0 0 ----- 4 1615 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 4 1630 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1645 4 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 1700 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1715 0 0 4 4 4 0 0 4 8 1730 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 4 1745 ----- ----- 0 0 ------------------------------ 0 0 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ 0 0 0 0 0 ----- ----- ------------------------------ TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: by Movement Intersection # 6 -------------------------------------------------------------- maple/busse/single Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- N -Approach E -Approach S -Approach W -Approach Int Time ----- RT TH LT ---------------------------- RT TH LT RT -------------- TH LT RT -------------- TH LT Total ----- ----- 1600 ---------------------------- 0 1 1 0 0 0 -------------- 0 1 0 -------------- 0 0 0 ----- 3 1615 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 2 1630 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 1645 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 1700 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3 1715 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 3* 1730 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1* 1745 ----- ----- 0 0 0 ---------------------------- 0 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0 -------------- 0 0 0* ----- ----- ---------------------------- -------------- -------------- TURNS/TEAPAC[Ver 3.61.12] - 60 -Minute Volumes: Appr/Exit Totals Intersection # 6 -------------------------------------------------------------- maple/busse/single Begin -------------------------------------------------------------- Approach Totals Exit Totals Int Time ----- N E ------------------------------ S W ------------------------------ N E S W Total ----- ----- 1600 ------------------------------ 2 0 1 0 ------------------------------ 1 1 1 0 ----- 3 1615 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 2 1630 1 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 3 1645 2 0 1 1 1 0 1 2 4 1700 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 3 1715 1 0 1 1 1 0 0 2 3* 1730 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1* 1745 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0* 56 Site Plan 57 /§ v 23�d m& // 2 V- 0 �� LL, ud 11 LU � �§\ w { LU e ® 444 3:4§ ) E ❑{ LU LU 2 � k �� LL, LU � �§\ w 3t� e = � E ❑{ 0 2 � k / ^ -i U / — 0 � � k �� LL, LU � �§\ w 3t� > � E ❑{ 0 2 � k ^ -i U / — 0 CMAP 2050 Projection Letter Kelly Pachowicz Consultant Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara and Aboona, Inc. 9575 West Higgins Road Suite 400 Rosemont, IL 60018 wi� 3 VVe i Van BunRn Slreea; ii.� if I e db, DO V Ilk:agn I 64( ,,01 ° August 9, 2021 Subject: Northwest Highway (IIS 14) @ Main Street (IL 83) IDOT Dear Ms. Pachowicz: ptl"- oq00 c inapr � IIno: is p, In response to a request made on your behalf and dated August 9, 2021, we have developed year 2050 average daily traffic (ADT) projections for the subject location. ROAD SEGMENT Current ADT Year 2050 ADT US 14 NW Hwy east of Main St IL 83 10,300 12,700 US 14 NW Hwy west of Main St IL 83 9,900 12,700 Main St IL 83 south of US 14 NW Hwy 15,400 20,000 Main St IL 83 north of US 14 NW Hwy 13,800 18,000 Traffic projections are developed using existing ADT data provided in the request letter and the results from the June 2021 CMAP Travel Demand Analysis. The regional travel model uses CMAP 2050 socioeconomic projections and assumes the implementation of the ON TO 2050 Comprehensive Regional Plan for the Northeastern Illinois area. The provision of this data in support of your request does not constitute a CMAP endorsement of the proposed development or any subsequent developments. If you have any questions, please call me at (312) 386-8806. Sincerely, Jose Rodriguez, PTP, AICP Senior Planner, Research & Analysis cc: May (KLoa); Rios (IDOT) 2021_CY TrafficForecast\MountProspect\ck-98-21\ck-98-21.docx 60 Census Data D Database 1[ OG OU III US111IR GU111111111E S TAIII 11101`4 IMI) OWNIMAII)S T TransH. Zoo n&; .2,15 Indle, 0 .„i 1 22 sirnairt Zoom % GeogiI ONA SollccAcd SIlation * Station * 11:::�Asfiirig 11 rans!R 0 I�IokmIiall 1 10 11 rairis!R lRegloin View as: I List Download as: W�)ird I Excel I CSV Chica o Transit Re I Ieirccir)Iw1ho talke 1 13.05 ll:iiairiin;1[,)c)iOl:aUllr)irii, I oir wall1k 2009: (8) Average irmi-rdbeir or vehidles 1.67 62 0 p 3, 71 A 77 4) N A Y s. Ieirccir)Iw1ho talke 1 13.05 ll:iiairiin;1[,)c)iOl:aUllr)irii, I oir wall1k 2009: (8) Average irmi-rdbeir or vehidles 1.67 62 availlablie Iper housellmlld 2009: (9) Average nuirnlhr°nir (A vehick"s 1.74 avalllalblk,, Iraor hi=wflhulld 20OR: Owineir Occui,.)Ied: (10) Avoirago, niAnnIbeir of vollfidles 1.23 Avalllali)W [mr Il ouselholld 2009:: Rentor Occujpiod: (11) I�Ieirceirfl or Ihouselhokk; w1rh 0 or 1 50.92 volih3le avaullatfllo 2009: (12) Vedlain Y( aii Siruchuire 11:3ulllt 1,973 2009: (13) M The year in which this station opened. This value is intended to intorm the analysis of available statistics, and therefore all stations open priorto"20M report as "Pre -2000", the year of the earliest available statistic. 2 Station location, current as of January 1, 2021. Station locations are updated (as necessary) on a quarterly basis which may result in changes in aggregated data. 3 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b08013 — 001 / b08132_001 aggregated from Census 2009 Tracts 4 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b19013001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 5 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (bO8301_010) I (bO8301_001) aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 6 Arnerican Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (bOB301_018 ) / (bD8301 — 001) aggregated 0 frorn Census 209 Block Groups 7 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (bO8301_019) I (bO8301001) aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 8 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (bOB301_010 + bO8301018 + bO8301_019) / (bOB301_001) aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 9 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b25046 —001 / b25044_001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 10 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b25046002 / b25044002 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 11 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b25046003 / b25044009 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 12 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates (b25lig 003+b25044004+b2504401 O+b2504401 1) / b25044001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups 13 American Community Survey 2005-2009 5 -Year Estimates b25035001 aggregated from Census 2009 Block Groups Colpyrighr 2009 21 Cenh�:I for Nelghlx)i hood enhindony ~ 17 Noirflh State Street #1400, ClNcw o, ll[ 60602 Tel: (7 73) 2 78 4800 63 Level of Service Criteria CsiI LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA 65 Signalized Intersections Average Control Level of Service . •(seconds per vehicle) A Favorable progression. Most vehicles arrive during the <_10 green indication and travel through the intersection without stopping. B Good progression, with more vehicles stopping than for >10 - 20 Level of Service A. C Individual cycle failures (i.e., one or more queued >20 - 35 vehicles are not able to depart as a result of insufficient capacity during the cycle) may begin to appear. Number of vehicles stopping is significant, although many vehicles still pass through the intersection without stopping. D The volume -to -capacity ratio is high and either >35 - 55 progression is ineffective or the cycle length is too long. Many vehicles stop and individual cycle failures are noticeable. E Progression is unfavorable. The volume -to -capacity ratio >55 - 80 is high and the cycle length is long. Individual cycle failures are frequent. F The volume -to -capacity ratio is very high, progression is >80.0 very poor, and the cycle length is long. Most cycles fail to clear the gueue. Unsignalized Intersections Level of .g- Total Delay (SECNEH) 0-10 B > 10 - 15 C > 15-25 D >25-35 E >35-50 F > 50 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, 2010. 65 Capacity Analysis Summary Sheets Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Lane Configurations 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 57 534 90 49 347 25 49 401 49 12 356 57 Future Volume (vph) 57 534 90 49 347 25 49 401 49 12 356 57 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 120 0 115 0 50 0 55 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1'' 0 Taper Length (ft) 125 115 45 110 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.96 0.99 Frt 0.978 0.990 0.984 0.979 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3459 0 1805 3490 0 1770 3321 0 1671 3483 0 Flt Permitted 0.508 0.367 0.207 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 935 3459 0 697 3490 0 380 3321 0 1611 3483 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 634 845 908 500 Travel Time (s) 14.4 19.2 20.6 11.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 1 1 9 10 22 22 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%q 2% 1% 0% 2% 4% 2% 6% 6% y 8% 1% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 60 562 95 52 365 26 52 422 52 13' 375 60 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 60 657 0 52 391 0 52 474 0 13 435 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right'; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 ; 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template; Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 1 67 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 10.0 22.0 9.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 60.0 26.0 60.0 22.0 55.0 29.0 62.0 Total Split (%) 15.3% 35.3% 15.3% 35.3% 12.9% 32.4% 17.1% 36.5% Maximum Green (s) 22.5 54.0 22.5 54.0 16.0 49.0 24.5 56.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 00 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s); 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None Max None None None None Wal kTime (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 ! 0 Act Effct Green (s) 117.4 108.6 116.8 108.3 40.1 35.5 7.0 27.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.64 0.69 0.64 0.24 0.21 0.04; 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.09 0.30 0.10 0.18 0.31 0.68 0.19 0.77 Control Delay 9.8 15.9 10.0 14.7 52.0 67.2 84.5 77.5 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 98 15.9 10.0 14.7 52.0 67.2 84.5 77.5 LOS A B A B D E F E Approach Delay 15.4 14.1 65.7 77.7 Approach LOS B B E E Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 174 17 95 45 245 14; 249 Queue Length 95th (ft) 44 253 39 146 79 318 40 300 Internal Link Dist (ft) 554 765 828 '! 420 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 115 50 55 Base Capacity (vph) 769 2209 638 2223 221 957 240; 1147 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio' 0.08 0.30 0.08 0.18 0.24 0.50 0.05 0.38 Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.77 Intersection Signal Delay: 40.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.9% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 2 .: Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 HCM 6th AWSC 2: Maple St & Busse Ave 08/12/2021 Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.5 Intersection LOS A Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 18 12 7 47 1 16 121 : 5 28 8 Future Vol, veh/h 3 18 12 7 47 1 16 12 1 5 28 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mumt Flow 5 27 18 11 71 2 24 18 2 8 42 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1' Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.6 7.6 7.5 HCM LOS; A A A A Vol Left, % 55% 9% 13% 12% Vol Thru, % .% 41,% 55% 85% 68% Vol Right 3% 36% 2% 20% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 29 33 55 41 LT Vol 16 3 7 5 Through Vol 12 18 47 28 RT Vol 1 12 1 8 Lane Flow Rate 44 50 83 62 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.052 0.055 0.096 0.07 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.268 3.947 4.136 4.071 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 829 896 858 869 Service Time 2.345 2.021 2.2 2.146 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.053 0.056 0.097 0.071 HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.3 7.6 7.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th -tile Q 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Existing AM Peak Hour Page 1 70 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Metra Lot/Maple Street & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h '! 11 412 4'' 1 358 18 0 0 0 30 119 : Future Vol, veh/h 11 412 4 1 358 18 0 0 0 30 1 19 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None - None - - None - - None Storage Length 60 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 38 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Mvmt Flow 12 458 4. 1 398 20 0 0 0 33 1 21 Conflicting Flow All 418 0 0 462 0 0 686 904 231 663 896 209 Stage 1 - - - - - - 484 484 - 410; 410 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 202 420 - 253 486 - Critical Hdwy 4.86 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 7.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Follow-up Hdwy 2.58 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.45 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 918 - - 1110 - - 338 279 777 351 282 758 Stage - - - - - - 538 555 - 595 599 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 787 593 - 735 554 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 918 - - 1110 - - 324 275 777 347 278 758 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 324 275 - 347 278 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 531 548 - 587 598 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 763 592 - 725 547 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.013 - - 0.001 - - 0.128 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 71 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Maple St & Surface Lot Drive 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h'! , 0 0 0 29 50 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 50 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None " - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mumt Flow 0 0 0 32 54 0 Conflicting Flow All 86 54 54 0 - 0 Stage 1 64 - - - - - Stage 2 32 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 915 1013 1551, - - - Stage 1 969 - - - - - Stage 2 991 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 915 1013 1551, - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 915 Stage 1 969 - - - - - Stage 2 991 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 2 72 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Maple St & Lower Lot Drive 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h'! , 0 0 0 29 50 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 29 50 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None " - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 32 54 0 Conflicting Flow All 86 54 54 0 - 0 Stage 1 64 - - - - - Stage 2 32 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 915 1013 1551, - - - Stage 1 969 - - - - - Stage 2 991 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 915 1013 1551, - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 915 Stage 1 969 - - - - - Stage 2 991 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Existing AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 73 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Lane Configurations 20 0 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 60 564 95 55 371 31 51 430 52 14 379 6 Future Volume (vph) 60 564 95 55 371 31 51 430 52 14 379 6 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 120 0 115 0 50 0 55 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1'' 0 Taper Length (ft) 125 115 45 110 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.98 0.99 0.97 1.00 Frt 0.978 0.988 0.984 0.998 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1770 3459 0 1805 3481 0 1770 3322 0 1671 3565 0 At Permitted 0.482 0.353 0.237 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 888 3459 0 671 3481 0 434 3322 0 1613; 3565 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 634 845 908 500 Travel Time (s) 14.4 19.2 20.6 11.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 9 1 1 9 10 22 22 10 Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 2%q 2% 1 % 0% 2% 4% 2% 6% 6% 8% 1 % 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 03 594 100 58 391 33 54 453 '! 55 15' 399 6 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 63 694 0 58 424 0 54 508 0 15 405 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right'; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 ; 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Proposed AM Peak Hour Page 1 74 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 10.0 22.0 9.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 26.0 60.0 26.0 60.0 22.0 55.0 29.0 62.0 Total Split (%) 15.3% 35.3% 15.3% 35.3% 12.9% 32.4% 17.1% 36.5% Maximum Green (s) 22.5 54.0 22.5 54.0 16.0 49.0 24.5 56.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 00 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s); 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None Max None None None None Wal kTime (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 ! 0 Act Effct Green (s) 117.2 108.4 116.2 106.4 40.0 35.4 7.2 27.6 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.69 0.64 0.68 0.63 0.24 0.21 0.04; 0.16 v/c Ratio 0.10 0.31 0.11 0.19 0.31 0.74 0.21 0.70 Control Delay 99 16.3 10.1 15.3 51.6 69.4 85.1 73.8 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 9.9 16.3 10.1 15.3 51.6 i 69.4 85.1 73.8 LOS A B B B D E F E Approach Delay 15.8 14.7 67.7 74.2 Approach LOS B B E E Queue Length 50th (ft) 20 181 18 101 48 270 16` 232 Queue Length 95th (ft) 47 277 44 163 80 340 44 274 Internal Link Dist (ft) 554 765 828 '! 420 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 115 50 55 Base Capacity (vph) 742 2205 623 2177 229 957 240; 1174 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio' 0.08 0.31 0.09 0.19 0.24 0.53 0.061 0.34 Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 50 (29%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.74 Intersection Signal Delay: 39.7 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.2% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Proposed AM Peak Hour Page 2 75 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 76 HCM 6th AWSC 2: Maple St & Busse Ave 08/12/2021 Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.5 Intersection LOS A Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 19 13 8 49 1 17 14 2 5 29 8 Future Vol, veh/h 3 19 13 8 49 1 17 14 2 5 29 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 0.66 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 5 29 20 12 74 2 26 21 3 8 44 12 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.3 7.7 7.6 7.5 HCM LOS; A A A A Vol Left, % 52% 9% 14% 12% Vol Thru, % 42% 54% 84% 69% Vol Right % 6% 37% 2% 19% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 33 35 58 42 LT Vol 17 3 8 5 Through Vol 14 19 49 29 RT Vol 2 13 1 8 Lane Flow Rate 50 53 88 64 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.059 0.058 0.101 0.072 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.26 3.959 4.155 4.091 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 830 892 854 864 Service Time 2.34 2.038 2.223 2.17 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.06 0.059 0.103 0.074 HCM Control Delay 7.6 7.3 7.7 7.5 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th -tile Q 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.2 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Proposed AM Peak Hour Page 1 77 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Metra Lot/Maple Street & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh 1.4 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h '! 17 433 4'' 1 376 21 0 0 0 37 136 : Future Vol, veh/h 17 433 4 1 376 21 0 0 0 37 1 36 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None: - None - - None - - None Storage Length 60 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 Heavy Vehicles, % 38 4 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 15 Mvmt Flow 19 481 4 1 418 23 0 0 0 41 1 40 Conflicting Flow All 441 0 0 485 0 0 733 964 243 711 955 221 Stage 1 - - - - - - 521 521 - 432 432 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 212 443 - 279 523 - Critical Hdwy 4.86 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 7.2 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5; - Follow-up Hdwy 2.58 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.45 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 897 - -; 1088 - - 312 257 764 324 260 744 Stage - - - - - - 512 535 - 577 586 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 776 579 - 710 534 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 897 - - 1088 - - 289 251 764 318 254 744 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 289 251 - 318 254 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 501 524 - 565 585; - Stage 2 - - - - - - 732 578 - 695 523 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio - 0.021 - - 0.001 - - 0.187 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 78 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Maple St & Surface Lot Drive 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h'! , 1 9 3 35 64 0 Future Vol, veh/h 1 9 3 35 64 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None " - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 10 3i 38 ' 70 0 Conflicting Flow All 114 70 70 0 - 0 Stage 1 70 - - - - - Stage 2 44 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 882 993 1531, - - - Stage 1 953 - - - - - Stage 2 978 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 880 993 1531, - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 880 Stage 1 951 - - - - - Stage 2 978 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.011 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 2 79 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Maple St & Lower Lot Drive 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h '! 111 3 33 53 1 Future Vol, veh/h 1 11 3 33 53 1 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None " - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 12 3% 36 58 1 Conflicting Flow All 101 59 59 0 - 0 Stage 1 69 - - - - - Stage 2 42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 898 1007 1545 - - - Stage 1 964 - - - - - Stage 2 980 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 896 1007 1545 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 896 Stage 1 962 - - - - - Stage 2 980 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - 0.013 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed AM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 80 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Lane Configurations 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 8 417 82 57 444 46 56 475 19 23 537 3 Future Volume (vph) 8 417 82 57 444 46 56 475 19 23 537 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 120 0 115 0 50 0 55 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1'' 0 Taper Length (ft) 125 115 45 110 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.975 0.986 0.994 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3483 0 1787 3464 0 1805 3549', 0 1736 3563 0 Flt Permitted 0.463 0.416 0.147 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 869 3483 0 778 3464 0 279 3549 0 1711 3563 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 634 845 908 500 Travel Time (s) 14.4 19.2 20.6 11.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 7 7 3 21 9 9 21, Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 0% 3% 1% 2% 8% 0% 1% 0% 4% 1% 33% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 8 434 85 59 463 48 58 495 20 24' 559 3 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 519 0 59 511 0 58 515 0 24; 562 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right'; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 ; 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Detector Template; Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Left Thru Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 1 81 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 10.0 22.0 9.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 41.0 60.0 41.0 60.0 27.0 42.0 27.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 24.1% 35.3% 24.1% 35.3% 15.9% 24.7% 15.9% 24.7% Maximum Green (s) 37.5 54.0 37.5 54.0 21.0 36.0 22.5 36.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 00 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s); 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None Max None None None None Wal kTime (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 ! 0 Act Effct Green (s) 110.4 103.2 114.8 110.4 43.9 37.4 7.9 32.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.65 0.61 0.68 0.65 0.26 0.22 0.05 0.19 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.25 0.10 0.23 0.37 0.66 0.30 0.82 Control Delay 12.2 17.9 11.8 14.3 50.1 64.5 87.1 76.1 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 12.2 17.9 11.8 14.3 50.1 64.5 87.1' 761 LOS B B B B D E F E Approach Delay 17.8 14.1 63.0 76.6 Approach LOS B B E E Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 145 22 118 48 282 26 320 Queue Length 95th (ft) 11 213 48 201 81 331 61 372 Internal Link Dist (ft) 554 765 828 '! 420 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 115 50 55 Base Capacity (vph) 789 2114 748 2249 263 i 825 229 770 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio' 0.01 0.25 0.08 0.23 0.22 0.62 0.10. 0.73 Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.82 Intersection Signal Delay: 43.6 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 54.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 15 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 2 82 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 Splits and Phases: 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 83 C ��:.�flflflfllflNflflflflfl��flfllllflfl �.��..IJ�..I�� N.�.fl��ili'IHNflflNflflflflfl �� fl�flNNNNP�fl�lll 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 83 HCM 6th AWSC 2: Maple St & Busse Ave 08/12/2021 Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.3 Intersection LOS A Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 15 5 3 22 3 7 10 356 : 7 20 15 Future Vol, veh/h 15 5 3 22 3 7 10 35 6: 7 20 15 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 Mumt Flow 16 5 3 24 3 8 11 38 6 8 22 16 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1' Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.3 7.5 7.1 HCM LOS; A A A A Vol Left, % 20% 65% 69% 17% Vol Thru, % 69% 22% 9% 48% Vol Right, % 12% 13% 22% 36% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 51 23 32 42 LT Vol 10 15 22 7 Through Vol 35 5 3 20 RT Vol 6 3 7 15 Lane Flow Rate 55 25 34 45 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.064 0.029 0.039 0.048 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.176 4.272 4.099 3.864 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 855 833 868 922 Service Time 2.213 2.323 2.149 1.906 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.064 0.03 0.039 0.049 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.5 7.3 7.1 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th -tile Q 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Existing PM Peak Hour Page 1 84 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Metra Lot/Maple Street & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h '! 9 399 11 506 29 2 7 3 18 0 : 20 Future Vol, veh/h 9 399 1, 1 506 29 2 7 3 18 0 20 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None: - None - - None - - None Storage Length 60 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 10 434 1 1 550 32 2 8 3 20 0 22 Conflicting Flow All 582 0 0 435 0 0 732 1039 218 809 1023 291 Stage 1 - - - - - - 455 455 - 568 568 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 277 584 - 241 455 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5; - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 1002 - - 1135 - - 313 232 792 275 238 712 Stage - - - - - - 560 572 - 480 510 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 712 501 - 747 572 - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 1002 - - 1135 - - 301 229 792 265 235 712 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 301 229 - 265 235 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 554 566 - 475 509 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 690 500 - 727 566 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.045 0.01 - - 0.001 - - 0.104 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Existing PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 85 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Lane Configurations 20 0 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 Traffic Volume (vph) 8 444 86 63 470 52 59 510 25 29 577 3 Future Volume (vph) 8 444 86 63 470 52 59 510 25 29 577 3 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Lane Width (ft) 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 Grade (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Storage Length (ft) 120 0 115 0 50 0 55 0 Storage Lanes 1 0 1 0 1 0 1'' 0 Taper Length (ft) 125 115 45 110 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 0.95 0.95 Ped Bike Factor 1.00 0.99 1.00 1.00 0.99 1.00 Frt 0.976 0.985 0.993 0.999 Flt Protected 0.950 0.950 0.950 0.950 Satd. Flow (prot) 1787 3487 0 1787 3459 0 1805 3544 0 1736 3564 0 Flt Permitted 0.449 0.395 0.133 0.950 Satd. Flow (perm) ; 843 3487 0 743 3459 0 253 3544 0 1713; 3564 0 Right Turn on Red No No No No Satd. Flow (RTOR) Link Speed (mph) 30 30 30 30 Link Distance (ft) 634 845 908 500 Travel Time (s) 14.4 19.2 20.6 11.4 Confl. Peds. (#/hr) 3 7 7 3 21 9 9 21, Confl. Bikes (#/hr) Peak Hour Factor 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 0.96 Growth Factor 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% Heavy Vehicles (%) 1% 0% 3% 1% 2% 8% 0% 1% 0% 4% 1% 33% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Parking (#/hr) Mid -Block Traffic (%) 0% 0% 0% 0% Adj. Flow (vph) 8 463 90 66 490 54 61 531 26 30 601 3 Shared Lane Traffic (%) Lane Group Flow (vph) 8 553 0 66 544 0 61 557 0 30 604 0 Enter Blocked Intersection No No No No No No No No No No No No Lane Alignment Left Left Right Left Left Right Left Left Right'; Left Left Right Median Width(ft) 12 12 12 12 Link Offset(ft) 0 0 0 0 Crosswalk Width(ft) 16 16 16 16 Two way Left Turn Lane Headway Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Turning Speed (mph) 15 9 15 9 15 9 ; 15 9 Number of Detectors 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 Leading Detector (ft) 20 100 20 100 20 100 20 100 Trailing Detector (ft) 0 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 Turn Type pm+pt NA pm+pt NA pm+pt NA Prot NA Protected Phases 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Permitted Phases 2 6 8 Detector Phase 5 2 1 6 3 8 7 4 Switch Phase 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Proposed PM Peak Hour Page 1 87 Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 -11 --p- t Minimum Split (s) 8.0 22.0 8.0 22.0 10.0 22.0 9.0 22.0 Total Split (s) 41.0 60.0 41.0 60.0 27.0 42.0 27.0 42.0 Total Split (%) 24.1% 35.3% 24.1% 35.3% 15.9% 24.7% 15.9% 24.7% Maximum Green (s) 37.5 54.0 37.5 54.0 21.0 36.0 22.5 36.0 Yellow Time (s) 3.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 3.5 4.5 All -Red Time (s) 00 1.5 0.0 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.5 Lost Time Adjust (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Lost Time (s); 3.5 6.0 3.5 6.0 6.0 6.0 4.5 6.0 Lead/Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead Lag Lead -Lag Optimize? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Minimum Gap (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Time Before Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Time To Reduce (s) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Recall Mode None C -Max None Max None None None None Wal kTime (s) 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 Flash Dont Walk (s) 11.0 11.0 11.0 11.0 Pedestrian Calls (#/hr) 0 0 0 ! 0 Act Effct Green (s) 107.2 98.9 112.7 108.2 45.1 36.9 8.4 34.7 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.63 0.58 0.66 0.64 0.27 0.22 0.05 0.20 v/c Ratio 0.01 0.27 0.12 0.25 0.40 0.72 0.35 0.83 Control Delay 13.2 19.9 12.8 15.5 49.5 67.1 88.6 75.0 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 13.2 19.9 12.8 15.5 49.5 67.1 88.6 75.0 LOS B B B B D E F E Approach Delay 19.8 15.2 65.4 75.6 Approach LOS B B E E Queue Length 50th (ft) 3 162 26 133 50 305 33' 343 Queue Length 95th (ft) 12 236 54 221 83 356 70 396 Internal Link Dist (ft) 554 765 828 '! 420 Turn Bay Length (ft) 120 115 50 55 Base Capacity (vph) 767 2027 722 2202 262 810 229 787 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio' 0.01 0.27 0.09 0.25 0.23 0.69 0.13 0.77 Cycle Length: 170 Actuated Cycle Length: 170 Offset: 63 (37%), Referenced to phase 2:EBTL, Start of Green Natural Cycle: 65 Control Type: Actuated -Coordinated Maximum v1c Ratio: 0.83 Intersection Signal Delay: 44.9 Intersection LOS: D Intersection Capacity Utilization 56.3% ICU Level of Service B Analysis Period (min) 15 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Proposed PM Peak Hour Page 2 :: Lanes, Volumes, Timings 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 Splits and Phases: 1: Main St & Northwest Hwy 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 C ��:.�flflflfllflNflflflflfl��flfllllflfl �.��..IJ�..I�� N.�.fl��ili'IHNflflNflflflflfl �� fl�flNNNNP�fl�lll 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 HCM 6th AWSC 2: Maple St & Busse Ave 08/12/2021 Intersection Delay, s/veh 7.4 Intersection LOS A Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h 16 5 3 23 3 7 11 4019 : 7 25 16 Future Vol, veh/h 16 5 3 23 3 7 11 40 19 7 25 16 Peak Hour Factor 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 0.93 Heavy Vehicles, % 7 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 1 0 Mumt Flow 17 5 3 25 3 8 12 43 " 20 8 27 17 Number of Lanes 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 Opposing Approach WB EB SB NB Opposing Lanes 1 1 1 1' Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB WB Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1 1 Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB EB Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1 1 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.2 HCM LOS; A A A A Vol Left, % 16% 67% 70% 15% Vol Thru, % 57% 21% 9% 52% Vol Right, % 27% 12% 21% 33% Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Traffic Vol by Lane 70 24 33 48 LT Vol 11 16 23 7 Through Vol 40 5 3 25 RT Vol 19 3 7 16 Lane Flow Rate 75 26 35 52 Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1 Degree of Util (X) 0.085 0.031 0.041 0.056 Departure Headway (Hd) 4.085 4.325 4.152 3.894 Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Cap 873 821 855 "914 Service Time 2.127 2.388 2.213 1.943 HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.086 0.032 0.041 0.057 HCM Control Delay 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.2 HCM Lane LOS A A A A HCM 95th -tile Q 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.2 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Synchro 11 Report Proposed PM Peak Hour Page 1 90 HCM 6th TWSC 3: Metra Lot/Maple Street & Northwest Hwy 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh 1.3 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h '! 25 419 11 531 35 2 7 3 23 0 : 32 Future Vol, veh/h 25 419 1, 1 531 35 2 7 3 23 0 32 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0; 0 Sign Control Free Free Free Free Free Free Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop RT Channelized - - None: - None - - None - - None Storage Length 60 - - - Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Grade, % - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - - 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Mvmt Flow 27 455 1 1 577 38 2 8 3 25 0 35 Conflicting Flow All 615 0 0 456 0 0 801 1127 228 884 1108 308 Stage 1 - - - - - - 510 510 - 598 598 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 291 617 - 286 510 - Critical Hdwy 4.1 - - 4.1 - - 7.5 6.5 6.9 7.5 6.5 6.9 Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5 - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - - - - 6.5 5.5 - 6.5 5.5; - Follow-up Hdwy 2.2 - - 2.2 - - 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 974 - - 1115 - - 279 206 781 243 212 694 Stage 1 - - - - - - 519 541 - 461 494 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 698 484 - 703 541; - Platoon blocked, % - - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 974 - - 1115 - - 259 200 781 230 206 694 Mov Cap -2 Maneuver - - 259 200 - 230 206 - Stage 1 - - - - - - 504 526 - 448 494 - Stage 2 - - - - - - 662 484 - 671 526 - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.051 0.028 - - 0.001 - - 0.159 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 1 91 HCM 6th TWSC 4: Maple St & Surface Lot Drive 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh 0.9 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h'! , 0 6 8+ 56 45 0 Future Vol, veh/h 0 6 8 56 45 0 Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None - None " - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 0 7 9; 61 49 0 Conflicting Flow All 128 49 49 0 - 0 Stage 1 49 - - - - - Stage 2 79 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 866 1020 1558 - - - Stage 1 973 - - - - - Stage 2 944 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 861 1020 1558 - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 861 Stage 1 967 - - - - - Stage 2 944 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.006 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 2 92 HCM 6th TWSC 5: Maple St & Lower Lot Drive 08/12/2021 Int Delay, s/veh 1.2 Lane Configurations Traffic Vol, veh/h '! 15 9 47 40 1 Future Vol, veh/h 1 5 9 47 40 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Free Free Free Free RT Channelized - None None " - None Storage Length 0 Veh in Median Storage, # 0 - 0 0 - Grade, % 0 - - 0 0 - Heavy Vehicles, % 2 2 2 2 2 2 Mvmt Flow 1 5 10 51 43 1 Conflicting Flow All 115 44 44 0 - 0 Stage 1 44 - - - - Stage 2 71 - - - - - Critical Hdwy 6.42 6.22 4.12 - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.42 - - - - - Critical Hdwy Stg 2 5.42 - - - - Follow-up Hdwy 3.518 3.318 2.218 - - - Pot Cap -1 Maneuver 881 1026 1564'' - - - Stage 1 978 - - - - - Stage 2 952 - - - - - Platoon blocked, % - - - Mov Cap -1 Maneuver 875 1026 1564'' - - - Mov Cap -2 Maneuver 875 Stage 1 971 - - - - Stage 2 952 - - - - - HCM LOS HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - 0.007 HCM Lane LOS 21-213 Mt. Prospect Residential Dev. Proposed PM Peak Hour Synchro 11 Report Page 3 93 Parking Ratios of Similar Developments 94 Table A PARKING RATIOS OF APARTMENT DEVELOPMENTS (NEAR PUBLIC TRANSIT) Development i Ratio River 595 Des Plaines 60 104 1.73 Walker & Parker Clarendon Hills 42 42 1.00 Forest & Gilbert Downers Grove 89 102 1.15 Adriatic Grove Downers Grove 48 64 1.33 Residences at the Grove Downers Grove 294 345 1.17 100 North Addison Elmhurst 165 199 1.21 1717 Ridge Evanston 175 205 1.17 AMLI Evanston Evanston 214 312 1.46 Central Station Evanston 80 80 1.00 E2 Evanston 356 371 1.04 The Reserve at Evanston Evanston 195 219 1.12 Midtown Square Glenview 138 160 1.16 The Reserve at Glenview Glenview 239 333 1.39 Uptown La Grange La Grange 254 336 1.32 Ninety7Fifty on the Park Orland Park 295 300 1.02 Wheaton 121 Wheaton 306 400 1.31 Average 184 223 1.22 95 0 Mom (847) 696-406 Fax, (847) 696-4065 Preliminary Stormwater Management Report 6 -STORY MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 100-112 E NORTHWEST HWY MOUNT PROSPECT, Illinois Project No. 10916.03 August 6, 2021 REVISED August 25, 2021 96 Tab Description Title Sheet Index Project Overview 1 Development Area Exhibit 2 Volume Control Calculations 97 PROJECT OVERVIEW The following preliminary stormwater management report is for the proposed 6 -story mixed-use development located at 100-112 E Northwest Highway, Mount Prospect, I L. Existing Conditions The existing 1.28 acre site contains a fire and police station along Northwest Highway with an existing underground parking level located north of the fire and police station and beneath the existing police station building. North of the fire and police stations is an existing surface parking deck over the northerly portion of the underground parking level. The underground parking level is accessed by an existing down ramp off Maple St. The existing surface parking deck is also accessed off Maple St. Proposed Conditions In the proposed condition, the existing underground parking level and the existing surface parking deck will remain in place. This area is 0.47 acres. The remaining 0.81 acre site area will be developed with a 6 -story mixed use building, ground level landscaped areas, and a residential amenity plaza. Stormwater Management As this site is in the 135C Zoning District, stormwater detention is not required under Village of Mount Prospect Ordinance. Stormwater detention is also not required for this project per the MWRD Watershed Management Ordinance (WMO). Per Article 5, Section 504.1, detention is required on multi -family residential development parcels totaling three (3) acres or more. The parcel is less than three acres. Site volume control is required per Article 5, Section 503 of the MWRD Watershed Management Ordinance (WMO). Per Article 5, Section 503.2., the first inch of runoff from the proposed impervious development area on the site shall be the volume control storage. The required volume is calculated to be 0.06 ac -ft (29,437 sf * 1.0" = 2,453 cf = 0.06 ac -ft). Due to the site constraint caused by the existing underground parking garage, the volume control for this project will be provided by a ground level green roof system above the parking level and an underground vault with a solid bottom. 6 -Story Mixed Use Development SPAUE INC. N: \Projects\10916\10916.03\DRAINAGE\10916.03_RPT-STORM_7302021. doc Mount Prospect, IL 98 1 Development Area Exhibit 6 -Story Mixed Use Development SPAHM INC. N:\Projects\10916\10916.03\DRAINAGE\10916.03_RPT-STORM_7302021.doc Mount Prospect, IL 99 -------------------------------------------------- IS 3-TdVWY'S ...... ...... .. .. . . . . .. .. . ..... 11,11"Ifv""I'', .. . ..... .... . .. .... ... . .... . ..... ..... .... . . .... ..... ...... ..... ..... . .... . . . .... . . . ..... . .. .... . .... .... . .... ...... . ... ..... . . . ..... . .... . .... . . .... ..... . .. �f! . . ..... ..... ...... . ...... . .... "I .. .. ... ...... .... .. jll . . ...... . . . . ..... . .. . ... . .. . ..... . . . ..... .. � � _ m// ^ � � _ 2 Volume Control Calculations 6 -Story Mixed Use Development SPAHM INC. N:\Projects\10916\10916.03\DRAINAGE\10916.03_RPT-STORM_7302021.doc Mount Prospect, IL 101 PROJECT: LOCATION: 9579 W. Higgins Road, Suite 700, Rosemont, Illinois 60018 - Phone: (847) 696-4060 Fax: (847) 696-4065 - 6 -STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT, COOK CO., IL CALCULATION TITLE: REQUIRED VOLUME CONTROL DESCRIPTION: DEVELOPMENT AREA SITE CONDITION: PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREAS • DEVELOPMENT • FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT #: DATE: LAST REVISED: 0.81 ACRES 0.81 ACRES TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 0.68 ACRES REQURIED DEPTH 1 INCHES VOLUME REQ'D = 0.06 AC -FT TOTALVOLUME REQ'D = 0.06 AC -FT 2,454 C. F. 10916.03 8/26/2021 102 9575 W. Higgins Rood, Suite 700, Rosemont, Illinois 60018 L ftq!)o Phone: (847) 696-4060 Fox: (847) 696-4065 PROJECT: 6-STORY MIXED-USE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT #: 10916 LOCATION: VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT, COOK CO., IL DATE: 8/26/2021 LAST REVISED: CALCULATION TITLE: PROVIDED VOLUME CONTROL DESCRIPTION: GREEN ROOF--"LIVEROOF BLUE" SITE CONDITION: PROPOSED SEE ATTACHED PRODUCT INFORMATION FOR "LIVEROOF BLUE" FOR REFERENCE LIVEROOF: 3,567 S.F. LIVEROOF BLUE* 0.267cf/sf =VOLUME CONTROL PROVIDED 952 CF VAULT: 215 S.F. VAULT AREA* 7.5' VAULT HEIGHT = VOLUME CONTROL PROVIDED 1,613 CF TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED= 2,565 C.F. OR 0.06 AC -FT 103 GALLONS PER CUBIC FOOT PER LIVEROOF BLUE SQUARE FOOT SQUARE FOOT VOLUME OF 2.0 0.267 RETAINED WATER LIVEROOF: 3,567 S.F. LIVEROOF BLUE* 0.267cf/sf =VOLUME CONTROL PROVIDED 952 CF VAULT: 215 S.F. VAULT AREA* 7.5' VAULT HEIGHT = VOLUME CONTROL PROVIDED 1,613 CF TOTAL VOLUME PROVIDED= 2,565 C.F. OR 0.06 AC -FT 103 RoofBlue Stormwater Detention System Designed For Use with the LiveRoof Green Roof System Control Flow Drain - Water Depth Not to Exceed 3.5" RoofEdge Maxx - 8.5" Tall Aluminum Edge Restraint LiveRoof Standard Module (4.25' TALL) :RoofBlue Riser For Temporary Stormwater Detention o Maximum Water Storage Beneath Modules is 3.5" (appx. 2gal/sq ft.) ° RoofEdge Maxx - 8.5" Tall Aluminum Edge Restraint Pavers or Stone Ballast For Parapet Detail And 4 4 Waterproofing Refer to Architectural Plans. ° For Concrete Roof Slab Refer To Structural Plans And For Waterproofing Refer To Architectural Plans. NOTES: It is critical to account for the maximum detained water weight of a blue roof solution. LiveRoof Global, LLC advises to consult a structual engineer to determine safety of a blue roof solution for a particular building, to consult the waterproofing membrane manufacturer for compatible roof systems for blue applications, and to consult drain manufacturers for compatible control - flow drain options and data. LiveRoof Global advises against detaining water on the roof for a period longer than 24 hours. LiveRoof Global makes no statements as to the suitability of RoofBlue for any buliding or membrane assembly and accepts no liability for the weight, watertightness and flow rates of blue roof designs. BLUE -A v05.2014 August 9, 2021 Mr. William J. Cooney via Email: bcooney@mountprospect.org Director of Community Development Village of Mount Prospect 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Re: Police/Fire Building RFP 112 East Northwest Highway Mount Prospect, Illinois Dear Mr. Cooney, On behalf of T2 Acquisitions, LLC and Harlem Irving Companies (collectively, the "Purchaser"), please accept this Letter of Intent ("LOI") to enter into a Redevelopment Agreement and Purchase and Sale Agreement (the "Agreements") for the property and improvements located at 112 East Northwest Highway in Mount Prospect, Illinois. It is understood that the property consists of an approximate 1.3 -acre parcel upon which the former Police and Fire Building is located. The former Police and Fire Building is currently vacant. This proposal supersedes any prior written or oral proposals or communications. Subject to T2/HI's completion of due diligence, the following outlines T2/HI's general terms of the proposed Purchase and Sale Agreement: Purchaser: T2/Harlem Irving Special Purpose Entity (to be formed) Seller: Village of Mount Prospect Purchase/Sale price: The purchase price for the Property shall be TWO MILLION DOLLARS ($2,000,000.00), payable as follows: (a) earnest money deposit of $25,000.00 due within five (5) days of full execution of the Agreements, and (b) the balance to be paid in cash at the close of escrow. The deposit shall be held in an interest- bearing account with the Title Company. Title/Survey: Purchaser will select a Title Insurance Company (the "Title Company") as its authorized title insurer. Upon the execution of the Agreement by Purchaser and Seller (the "Effective Date"), Purchaser shall order a preliminary title commitment for a current form ALTA owner's policy of title insurance for the Property from the Title Company, which shall provide for full extended coverage over the general exceptions customarily contained in such title policy, in the full amount of the Purchase Price, together with copies of all recorded documents affecting the Property, including any such easement parcels (the "Commitment"). Upon the Effective Date, Purchaser will order, from a surveyor selected by Purchaser, a survey of the Property, including any easement parcels which benefit the Property (the "Survey"). The Seller will pay for the cost of the survey at closing. Title/Survey Review: During the period commencing on the receipt of the Commitment from the Title Company and the survey and terminating sixty (60) days thereafter (the "Title and Survey Review Period"), Purchaser shall review Title and Survey and Purchaser shall notify Seller within the Title and Survey Review Period of any l� ��a'� 1% NSA � � �M I. N J .. 4AM.11., T"ON,. PARI N R.. 105 matters disclosed by the Commitment or Survey that are not acceptable to Purchaser, in its sole discretion. In the event Purchaser finds any aspect of Title or Survey unacceptable to Purchaser on or prior to the last day of the Title and Survey Review Period, Purchaser may terminate the Agreement by giving Seller written notification of its election, in which event the Earnest Money and all accrued interest thereon shall be immediately returned to Purchaser by the Escrow Agent, without necessity for consent or approval by Seller, and the parties shall be released from all further liability under this Agreement. Investigation Period: During the period commencing on the day after the Title and Survey Review Period and terminating sixty (60) days later (the "Investigation Period"), Purchaser shall have the right to take all steps necessary, in Purchaser's sole and absolute discretion, to evaluate the feasibility of the Property for Purchaser's proposed use, including, without limitation, zoning, survey, title, taxes, utilities, and the environmental condition of the Property. In the event Purchaser is not completely satisfied with all aspects of the Property, in its sole and absolute discretion, Purchaser may terminate this Agreement by giving Seller written notification of its election to terminate prior to the expiration of the Investigation Period, in which event the Earnest Money and all accrued interest, shall be immediately returned to Purchaser by the Escrow Agent, without necessity for consent or approval by Seller, and the parties shall be released from all further liability under this Agreement. Approvals Period: If Purchaser does not terminate the Agreement on or before the expiration of the Survey/Title Review and Investigation Period, then commencing on the day after the expiration of the Investigation Period and terminating one hundred eighty (180) days later (the "Approvals Period"), Purchaser shall seek to obtain all Approvals required for Purchaser's intended use. In the event Purchaser is unable to obtain any of the Approvals or any of the Approvals are issued with conditions or limitations which are unacceptable to Purchaser, in its sole and absolute discretion, Purchaser may terminate this Agreement by giving Seller written notification of its election on or prior to the last day of the Approvals Period in which event the Earnest Money and all accrued interest, shall be immediately returned to Purchaser by the Escrow Agent, without necessity for consent or approval by Seller, and the parties shall be released from all further liability under this Agreement. Access and Documents: Seller shall provide Purchaser with full access to the Property to make inspections. Seller shall make available to Purchaser within five (5) days after full execution of a purchase contract all books, records, legal documents and other information concerning the physical condition of the Property. Closing: The close of escrow shall occur within thirty (30) days after Purchaser provides notice to Seller that its contingencies have been satisfied or waived. Purchaser's obligation to close escrow is subject to the following contingencies: L The Title Company being prepared to issue the Title Policy on the Closing Date, subject only to the Approved Exceptions; and ii. Seller's representations and warranties in this Agreement being correct as of the Effective Date and as of the Closing Date; �� m� ��" C .A p i. ']['.`� L ` I . E M . 'J",. 1-1AMIETO'$ARTNER-S 106 iii. Seller terminating any existing management agreements; and iv. Proper zoning in place to permit development of multi -family apartments; and v. Execution of a Redevelopment Agreement approved by Purchaser and Seller. Failure to Close Escrow: If escrow fails to close because of Seller's default, Purchaser shall be entitled to specific performance or the return of the deposit and all accrued interest without offset or deduction. Should escrow fail because of Purchaser's default, the deposit shall be kept by Seller as liquidated damages. If escrow fails to close for any other reason, the deposit shall be returned to Purchaser, the escrow shall be canceled, and neither party shall have any further rights or responsibilities to the other. Purchase & Sale Agreement: The parties acknowledge that they have not set forth herein nor agreed upon all essential terms of the subject matter of an agreed transaction, including, without limitation, warranties and representations, conditions precedent, indemnities and other anticipated terms, and that such essential terms will be the subject of further negotiations. Noncompete/Exclusivity: In consideration of Purchaser preparing to expend time and expense upon full execution of this Letter of Intent, Seller agrees, from and after execution of this letter that no negotiations or agreements concerning the sale, exchange or lease of the Property will be entered into directly or indirectly by Seller. If a purchase contract is not negotiated, approved and executed by June 30, 2021, Seller may disregard this provision. It is expressly understood that this Letter of Intent is not a binding agreement between the parties but is intended only to outline the basic terms under which both parties would consider entering into a Purchase and Sale Agreement of the Premises. The Purchase and Sale Agreement for the Premises between the parties shall incorporate the general provisions as may be agreed to bind the parties. If the above Letter of Intent meets with your approval, please sign and date where indicated below and return one (1) fully executed copy to me by August 31, 2021. This LOI is null and void thereafter. Thank you for your consideration. We look forward to your prompt response. Sincerely, Tom Lowe lIV 2A a< "]C'.'� I. Acknowledged and Agreed on behalf of Seller: Signature: Printed Name: Date: 107 LEGAL DESCRIPTION LOT A IN CORPORATE SUBDIVISION NO. I VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT, A RESUBDIVISION OF LOTS 8 TO 14 IN BLOCK 12 IN BUSSE & WILLIE'S RESUBDIVISION IN MT. PROSPECT RECORDED JANUARY 26, 1979 AS DOCUMENT 24817046, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. 11 (A'A P ITA 1, 2 1W A X A G E M E N'l- 1-1AMIETO'$ARTNER-S 108 SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL The T2/Hl/HP proposal is to acquire the former Police/Fire parcel at 112 East Northwest Highway and redevelop the property into a 6 -story, 88 -unit multi -family apartment building containing 3,500sf of retail/restaurant space, on-site parking, landscaping improvements, and corresponding site improvements. Reuse of the existing parking structure will accommodate 120 on-site parking stalls dedicated for residents (1.36 parking stalls/unit) with street parking and use of the commuter lot providing ample parking for the retail component. The unit mix for the project currently anticipates 9 studio apartments, 61 one -bedroom units, 12 two-bedroom units, and 6 unique three- bedroom townhome units with garages. The gross building area for the project is 128,935sf with a net residential square footage of 76,624sf. A detailed site plan and elevation study accompanies this submittal. lIV �� A ITA 1, 109 N z E W O 3 N V ON z N r Z N ar C` a0 0 O < ., LL �IIIIIIII O D �� A�nnnnnnnnnfl»' y„ w"" Cl) n, Z LUw a, rr.w0. o Z ��'Urrlr0 �w. 0. a N s' w � O a w O O O Z H Q Z Q Y O Lu C7 a= o ZQ ga O Q C¢7 w a ¢ 3 z U w ¢ z> F w 3 Z O Z Z U w H w U ¢ o w w O z w U w w o X w w J X m� w2 x'D LL f w K w O am Q wC7 F FC7 O 1S 3PdVW S Z a J a w 0 \0 Z LL ao J Z CL :) W 0 k=♦^^ Cl) 0 x m m m J W LL _ W Q W � a cUn _ Lu W 0 o z - d pow Z N -o =- _ !E U o x m m m J W LL N W Q OJ cUn a Z z w w w w w w w w w w w w O M U= o z F N LU w = N WF O ry rr a` O zz r = w o N N U N W O w a a � m ra a z O 1�,oi�,nn�l��Jr+ru�ulj m, "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� � o 6 a J W LL W Q OJ cUn r -F 0 oa w� 0 M < w m w J= LLJ'Ow,l > }LU z o J cn r,"141 l�,oi�,nn�l�/Jr+ru�ulj m, "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� �� !.) ................. . ................... ............................... ................... r IVVI IVI--- ---- --- I �� - ---- ---- -- - -------- 0 w w N / F o 0 N �q � O p otl Q Q 01 X(9 / s O �- / o Soo) �p w / J � z LU Lu / J Q / LU w� /O Q / J Cl) ssz LLI co a`b w cn u LLLIF o n� Q zz Z ~ W ~ op = w o z W / w NO w a a n y a > Q - / a El 0 oa w� 0 M < w m w J= LLJ'Ow,l > }LU z o J cn r,"141 l�,oi�,nn�l�/Jr+ru�ulj m, "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� �� !.) ................. . ................... ............................... ................... r IVVI IVI--- ---- --- I �� - ---- ---- -- - -------- 0 w w N / F o 0 N �q � O p otl Q Q 01 X(9 / s O �- / o Soo) �p w / J � z LU Lu / J Q / LU w� /O Q / J Cl) W, h � m Fm Z o z M - o w LU "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� � �i Fb-1 r+ u w � a W L a g w F Z Q = O W N O O z N K/ w� UQ < W o N N •�9 5 a � � > a / � z / n r / W .. M w W Q uvi V h � m Fm Z o z M - o w LU "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� � �i Fb-1 r+ u Z Q J IL LL O O w CSO' 2 U = � w w WF o ry r a O z r = w No N N U N W O N a a ra a z O "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� � C„fes,) W �Y P -a F+-1 I -i ry�ryww MOW ti o OF W Q m ¢ �J = ¢ p U w O w W 3k W U>)LLI N ^ p z m s ow > w z > W F d Q > g ¢ Y ? o O w 0 m 0 z LU ¢ 2 2 d :2O v. M M 0 M o om 0 0 0 0 0 o a w p o F U T N O O O O z 0 0 00 w rn to 222 w to Z Z -2 O O to O rn O LUO ¢0 00 00 000 000 ��oo o o 0 0 a p Fz� wa z O to X wt 0. ¢z Q N CJ N m a m ~ w w Q z W w va Ua J O m ~ O c� o Z Z o o x I �IDw m m m w� w o fox¢ �w O O o o X oo O. z ? J Q Y Z 2OO K O w U m w o Z O m H OKa O Z �wrio OJ 2 o S o Z O [Cp = 0 w22�m m z SCK Jzw�O J w2 p 2 m�wH00 W (D MS < .....4� In W ry W Zw0 ��wOHH �w� �_�QZ C7 . OOm� OO[n w. 0 �d0�� K�OmOm — W = a0 Um0� 00 C70 d O Uw .c0— Opd d cn inti�LL ¢ �¢ti¢ �dw w w �¢CCo�� ww cli ti US�ww 1 = OUOOO.6 ¢ lr1r dw� = m � Z VVVVVVVVVI m K Q Q U O Z y m J O� O ��flPll01lLill(��1@0/l��/ � 0- W z W N 00 O N m m ww U - D D a ON O W CD O n U OEE :50 w Z Z O O u~i P -a w o 0 ID w O -Joh K ~mCD `K p 4 Y W U 0 0 0 tiff U U �� cl O � ¢ m + ��m ww + c� �C�w + N m 'w✓ OME cn o 0 m O 0 U NU O 0000 0 UU 00 n NH(n— 0 O O O z 0 2 0 0 O O Z pZ w O 2 w 00000 O 0000 2w O O ww wOwo 00 O— O ww 00 g U O a a a a a a a s a s a? a? a s o 0 0 0 < Qw O Q p Z 0 O w H W N Q ¢ U Z m U Z U o O u� wC7 O O d H O � � o 0 o x w p O O N N w �a- ---- 0 F N O o o� oo LU. NO o 0 0 ME— � J Q t �z owao< W m Uw U W N O Y C7 - LL oo" O Q Q m O z aQQ Q 0 Q ¢ H H w n n n U O U J z o o K d ID—N Y O p w w w p p J O O DC7 U' C7 C7 ¢ Z Z Z Z O m y 0 v p O in In mQ O C7 w w LL J U Z J J p O w � Y W W W K ti H ¢-- w H ti w O H Nm "' �mM�z»v�z O �H��Zxw�CZ„¢7,Wmzo WmzoWmzo�¢moyjU�mNUH�� — c 0_ c7¢ oWmz �mmzzzzzz0 ¢ m w 2 H J OU U �¢��ul zp x K KK CC Q Q Q w win u� M M ul m in win m x M M X J M W in � X Ed coo�000000 UUO w w w w w w w 00 Q w Z d U N U XaQ Xa x¢ -MM ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ ¢ 0 Q O OS oa W o ¢ a20 c c a Q w ¢ Q O til K m to � M w to U C C C v �n cn d w -wwww - LL O Ed Z 0 z O z ma JJ4 0 0 C) (D z z z X x x D 0 x 0 C) w 0- jj®r � � � i?5 � � N N N W x x N p p V) (,) (o EY) w z 0 I-- Of Z -j 00 7- ui z a- w co (D co 0 -i 0 0 a- a- 0 () (D 5; �e ry < r) w LU Lij I --I-- H l< I-- l< LL: U) 0 0 Dam z w Z LULIJ LU < 2 LU C) co Lu L) co Lu z co w z 0 F- to z 'ji < W2 0 �W5 LU N FL 2 Ed Z 0 z O z ma JJ4 0 JJ4 0 0 C) (D z z z < D 0 x 0 C) w 0- jj®r J i Cl) Z 0 .j LU 0 Z 73 .j z m m z 0 z 0 mm z 0 m i a z m m z U c., w w m m w 0 Z 1- 0 11- "T I cl) I CNI 0 C� C, - CD - c) c� z LL x x x LU C) LU LU ;z ;z ;z Ob � O LU LU W bo bo LU < LU o0A - Q cfl - CN W x x (D z w D N p p (D z w zz �o �n �n C., LU z 0N , U) cr Lu Z LU -j 00 00 T (D ui z 0 a-, co 0 0 m 0 z 0 0 w 0 0 0 (D LU LU L)i UJ C? �E 2 1<1 1<1 I,< eh LL: 0 0 0 li ui 0 m OJ zi z WL' ui -J Q uj Z co w z DO Lu z DO Lli Z 0 F- (n F - z uj () o < _j W2 Cz z r, 0 () _j W2 ui z m m z 0 z 0 mm z 0 m i a z m m z U c., w w m m w 0 Z 1- 0 11- "T I cl) I CNI 0 C� C, - CD - c) c� z LL LU LU C) LU LU LU 0(-) C) � zw C) Ob � O LU LU LU LU < LU o0A - Q cfl - CN 0 0 0 JJ4 C) z cr 0(-) C) � zw C) 0 < 0 Q (D z w D 0 C) (D z w zz ................................................. C., 00 0: z z 0 0 w 0 0 0 (D UJ C? �E 2 uj < eh li ui 0 OJ zi Cl) Z _0 W J W 0 Z 73 J _ M) W ol_ ol_ ol_ ol_ ol_ of O J D J D J D J 0 J 0 Z LLT wT wT wT wT wT _ ct W-_ W(p Win WV Wih �o �(p Jl0 J� JM JN JT C70 U M w Q U U Z w LL Z Z of U w w O O K H O C O O c Lu OT 4) u) 47 O J =' � > O K d > U U U d mm J M m z S� Q >O z > JIT O > O a[ Z U X X X > WM 2i0U m m m?2P J O S S S LV Z Z - M H LU W W bo\ (7 o W CO Z� O, ,. N N N Q C:? W X X X W mm M to ih ih th CO W I�1�IlUln�(��NGOUA .� �� oviiililgllll11111/�� •� Q Z[0 O � M � W4 P -a LLI O Z CO LU O w m = m O m } Z Y IL 0 U � C7 2E 0 w LU LU 1 1 I lL0 0 0 D a�afry a zzz in� Z Z Z Z Z (7 =V W W z Y Y Y Z U F- U J U U U 0 UQ O LU m m m J J W W W W H Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q w w W Qr N M r 7 N ol_ ol_ ol_ ol_ ol_ of O J D J D J D J 0 J 0 Z LLT wT wT wT wT wT _ ct W-_ W(p Win WV Wih �o �(p Jl0 J� JM JN JT C70 U M w Q U U Z w LL Z Z of U w w O O K H O C O O c Lu OT U m U U O J =' � > O K d > U U U d i� J M a w O ¢ z w > z S� Q >O z > JIT O > O a[ Z U U= H Z > WM 2i0U m m m?2P J O J N ol_ ol_ ol_ ol_ ol_ of O J D J D J D J 0 J 0 Z LLT wT wT wT wT wT _ ct W-_ W(p Win WV Wih �o �(p Jl0 J� JM JN JT C70 U M w Q U U } d Z of w w O # ami W F ry r o a U U p U K d > U J D J D LL N U N N W O a a N 0 h IS C) T— M of al al_ of ol_ # ami W F ry r o a 0 J 0 J D J D J D J D LL N U N N W O a a N dao > l- > W� > W� > W� > WM C Y 0 J l f) J J M J N J T C) T— M 0 N N U = z H � N Wo W = # ami W F ry r o a O z r = w No N U N N W O a a N ra a Ka m z o z � � m LV Z Z - M H LU 0 ' ^ VI J O (7 o W CO Z� O, ,. H Q C:? LU W mm M (n Lu W CO I�1�IlUln�(��NGOUA .� �� oviiililgllll11111/�� •� Q O � M � W4 P -a 0 N N W c F o 0 a o= Z OooU O F o Ka > > w J W J Ol LV Z Z - M H LU 0 ' ^ VI J O (7 o W CO z Q LLz O� � Z Z0 LLJ H � Z U) J m ba U> W J ~ J W O ao Lu aUx Z ZD FW O �W wz �z a 0 CD ZU) z oo wo ~ W O J ZI a O o � U = � z F LU w WF o ry r a O z r = W No N N U N W O N a a ra a z O o= O j O OI C LU 0 a z 0 w 0 H z ►�wE � tV w w __ oa N T— U = � z H N WW xk U5 = N W F O ry ry a` O zz r = w No N N U N W O N a a U ra a z O ii �"dw,ll H O z L U= o z H W w --- � I � 'o a Q O lz W = w o C,4 N N LU 0 N LL W O Z 0 a' a O 0� z LL O W_ � cicl� • ■ H O z L U= o z H W w --- � I � 'o a Q O lz W = w o C,4 N N LU 0 N LL W O Z 0 a' a O 0� z LL O W_ m „LL -16: 0 ........... ....... ......... ... UJ LO T— �;F 0 0 0 N X x UJ LO T— fob,oan W4 SQ > > n 0 A W H W J m J _Q W Y Y _U U 2 J m W 00 W Q a U) CD C� Z W � m Z -75; Y w U - m CQQ mLLj-_ W Q Q07Z N wH Q m Z 0 W Z O U) 0_ w IL Y � UO U m LLI W Q L<L� w m H Z W U a z J H OW W W C� O G N N L W O U = N Z H W Yk o W = N W F O z = W N N N U N W o ;� a a ra a Z O "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� � in un Ln w m m x x x _ _ _ bo N N N W X X X N Fh b� th W z 0 m Z CO LU 0 m = m o Y m z IL OU 0 U O 2 w LU LU LL 0 0 0 D a� Q H H H o ZZz Z Zz =V W z Y Y Y Z LL, U a- U J U U U 0 Ua O LU m m m J (1) J W w w w Q Q a a a a a W w ^2 LL LL LL U W Qr N M r r N Y Y _U U 2 J m W 00 W Q a U) CD C� Z W � m Z -75; Y w U - m CQQ mLLj-_ W Q Q07Z N wH Q m Z 0 W Z O U) 0_ w IL Y � UO U m LLI W Q L<L� w m H Z W U a z J H OW W W C� O G N N L W O U = N Z H W Yk o W = N W F O z = W N N N U N W o ;� a a ra a Z O "0j"argrrrylllllll%�� •'� � ll T)3dS011d '1W _ 1N3WdOl3A3U 3sn-43XIW S' 5907969 (L48)�xed 0904-969 (L48)�auo4d - d AHOlS - 9 9L009 sloullll 'luowasoa 'OOL aIng 'peob sul66lH 'M 9L96 z W a O W N W z W a N Z J W W CC/Y` IL O Q �Oo 2 z tA J W � = W Z IaA 00 u Z pC LU LJ a O N � d 0 1531d➢'W 'S x g L 1331115 NOS113W3 ' x g z a o o = wCV - ol siONIIII TMSOad 'IW = -s'.�o1: ""9, 1N3WdO13A34 35fl-43XIW "q 4111'. m A2101S - 9 Ntlld Alllan?V 9NIaVd9 AUVNIW1138d 9 sIONInI.1J3dsoad'1W 1N3Wd013A34 35fl-43XIW A2101S - 9 133815 3ldVW (33SOd08d s- sc��re�:�� ""9, ¢.eraoad ��PeOasge� u, - - - a O 3 K 3 K 3 o K Z Z O Z O Z O U U U WU V)_ w w w LU J J J J CL Q Q a Q moa- _ - —- ---- moa — ---- moa — — moa -- — sW== \i� o E ----------- -- - 1338153ldVW'S = SSP - 6L l0£ � �_ �4=O� a Zz w911 Xo �o c y R a x 'lO3dS08d 1Nnovi �x�auo LMH 1S3MHi2JON 3 ONV 1S I�dVW �� sp:, sz irvr irawnoo .e.ry N J ��p� CJ ll�j"'/1 �aaae�rera� Oona+oaae�u LN�Wd�-lAAAG QASOdMAd NV-ld3dVOSONV-1A?JVNIWI-32Jd g m mya a- a J333 .3 C O _ � sa b ge e G 3 3 s ti 2 v r .. 4 z a 0 s E dr o 133b1S 3�dVW i r „ O O m Sm 0. w C C -------- 4L o o 6 ri �j�� z g w d C z Q z J uJ w �a a� SioNllll'i:)3dS011d'.LW M= IN3WdOl3A3(13Sfl-(13XIW Allols - 9 II8IHX3 39VU3A07INVH(IAH 31111 Harmon, Connor From: shanna212@comcast.net Sent: Wednesday, September 8, 2021 3:14 PM To: Harmon, Connor Subject: Case No. PZ -14-21 -- 112 E Northwest Highway, Mt. Prospect, IL As taxpaying citizens of Mt. Prospect, we respectfully request that the Planning and Zoning Commission give very careful thought and consideration to granting any relief from the Village of Mt. Prospect to any developer wishing to add more luxury apartments and retail space to the downtown landscape. We have more than enough apartments and the world of retail has changed, trending toward more use of online shopping and less in person shopping. We agree that this property needs to be developed rather than sit with a vacant building, but we suggest that row homes would be a much better choice. Row homes/condominiums seem to sell. The last thing Mt. Prospect needs in the downtown area is another 5 -story apartment building. Thank You for your time. Steve and Sharyl Hanna 215 University Drive Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 139 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION CASE NO. PZ -14-21 Hearing Date: September 9, 2021 PROPERTY ADDRESS: 112 E. Northwest Highway PETITIONER: T2 Capital Management, LLC PUBLICATION DATE: August 25, 2021 REQUEST: CU: Final PUD MEMBERS PRESENT: Thomas Fitzgerald William Beattie Norbert Mizwicki Walter Szymczak Joseph Donnelly Donald Olsen Lisa Griffin MEMBERS ABSENT: STAFF MEMBERS PRESENT Bill Cooney, AICP — Director of Community Development Connor Harmon —Senior Development Planner Ann Choi — Development Planner INTERESTED PARTIES Harlem Irving Companies, Hamilton Partners, Village of Mount Prospect Chairman Donnelly called the meeting to order at 7:01 PM. Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Szymczak to approve the minutes from the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting on August 12, 2021. The minutes were approved 7-0. Chairman Donnelly introduced case, PZ - 14 -21112 E. Northwest Highway (Subject Property), for a conditional use for a final planned unit development (PUD). This case is Village Board final. Mr. Harmon gave a brief description and explained the sites previous history as the former Police & Fire Station headquarters, where the Departments' utilized the property for over 25 years. Mr. Harmon explained a space and needs analysis was performed and found the existing property did not have enough space for both Departments. He explained that after years of due diligence and construction, both the Police and Fire Departments moved to alternate locations with more space. Further, he explained the Village initiated the RFP process and initially chose Greystar as the preferred developer, but due to cell tower issues on the Chase Bank building to the north (the old plan included the northern property and former Busse Flowers building to the northwest), Greystar pulled out of the deal. The Village issued a new RFP, and the preferred developer was selected and is the Petitioner. He explained a couple street level images showing in better detail the existing structure and parking lot on the Subject 140 Property. He then explained the proposed ground level floor plan and details on the request, which include an 88 unit, 6 story structure with 3,500 square feet of retail/restaurant space. Subsequent images showed the renderings and perspectives of the proposed building, which Mr. Harmon explained features alternating recessed walls, alternating brick color, and significant architectural interest on the northwest fagade, as that part of the building will be particularly exposed to those traveling southeast on Northwest Highway or on the Metra. Mr. Harmon continued that the Petitioner hired Kenig, Lindgren, O'Hara, Aboona Inc. (KLOA) to conduct a traffic impact study on the immediate area of the Subject Property. The study found that there will be no significant impact on area roadways from the request. Mr. Harmon explained the study suggests there will only be a 3% increase in development generated traffic, and that the proposed access drives will be adequate in accommodating on-site traffic. Mr. Harmon went on to say the proposed parking as part of the request exceeds what is required by Code, and that additional right-of-way (ROW) stalls are proposed along Maple Street. He explained that the surface level lot will be available to the public, residents, and visitors. In total, 120 parking stalls are proposed on site with up to 10 stalls proposed along Maple Street. He concluded that overflow parking can utilize the Metra lot to the south across Northwest Highway. Mr. Harmon touched on the school impact, in which between 5 and 6 school aged children are proposed to be generated as part of the request. Mr. Harmon then spoke on long range planning efforts, and noted several documents which support the request, including the 2013 Homes for a Changing Region report created by the Chicago Metropolitan Area for Planning (CMAP), the 2017 Village Comprehensive Plan, the 2013 Downtown Implementation Plan, and the 2021 Strategic Plan. Finally, Mr. Harmon stated the Village is supportive of the request subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. Commissioner Beattie asked how the school generation projection is considered and how other development's impacts have on schools compared to each other. Mr. Cooney stated school impacts are considered in these types of projects, and this same formula is used by actual school districts. Commissioner Beattie asked how the school district has responded to these developments. Mr. Cooney explained the school districts have had no objections, and school districts end up favorably financially after completion and stabilization. Chairman Donnelly asked staff to explain how impact fees relate to schools. Mr. Cooney explained each district has an average cost per student in the State; District 57 around $11,000 per student, and District 214 around $20,000 per student. He also explained that within TIF 141 districts, up to 40% of the increment generated goes to schools based on school children generation, and that right now the Village is well below that percentage according to other developments. Chairman Donnelly swore in Tom Lowe, 120 S. Elm, Mount Prospect, as the Petitioner. Mr. Lowe said the 10 N. Main development has generated 4 school aged children based on 92% occupancy, and 3 of those children were already in the Mount Prospect school districts. Mr. Lowe presented the request and project, covering much of what Mr. Harmon explained in his presentation. Mr. Lowe explained that he has spearheaded or is spearheading other downtown mixed use developments in the Mount Prospect downtown, and he believes this proposal exceeds what their group proposed in the original RFP request, in which Greystar was originally selected. He also explained he is a Mount Prospect resident in close proximity to the Subject Property. He then explained most zoning standards and regulations are met, but because of the PUD request, it does require a conditional use request and therefore the entitlements process. He explained the floor plans of the building, and the general mixed use concept of the proposal. Mr. Lowe concluded with the proposed edits from the Village's Public Works Department, which relate to the proposed streetscape and ROW upgrades within Maple Street. Chairman Donnelly swore in Katie Lambert, 2721 N. Albany Street, Chicago, IL as the lead architect. Ms. Lambert touched on the site plan and exciting floor plan program which is geared toward a pedestrian oriented design. She noted the unique combination of townhomes, apartments, and commercial space on the plan. She then explained the flow of the parking lot, and explained the other floor plan levels of the building. Ms. Lambert provided detail on the elevations, and explained the brick types and alternating colors throughout the building. She eluded to the surplus in glass on the building, and noted that natural light will be abundant. Ms. Lambert then explained the brick patterning and general architectural interest around the building, specifically the northwest elevation. Ms. Lambert then showed and explained a typical layout plan of one of the units, which features an open floor plan with large closet spaces, and a balcony depending on the specific unit type. Mr. Lowe concluded the team is confident in the plan and believes it is appropriate given the context and location of the property. Commissioner Mizwicki asked about the electrical plan and proposed generator location. He asked the size of the generator and if it can be placed underground. He cited safety concerns with the location and wants more detail on the generator. Mr. Lowe explained there is an existing generator below grade, but that specific unit cannot be reused. Chairman Donnelly swore in Nathan Adams, 243 Middleton Avenue, Palatine, IL, Director of Construction for Harlem Irving Companies. 142 Mr. Adams explained there is an existing generator, and cannot be reused because it is gas fired and it is underground. Mr. Adams noted he would find out additional details on the generator. Mr. Adams also indicated each unit would have its own HVAC system for heating and cooling, which would be the grates within the building fagades. Commissioner Beattie asked about the demographic at 10 N. Main Street. Mr. Lowe indicated 66% of the residents are single, 33% are married or divorced, most residents are under 50 years old, and several residents are retired. He also indicated 41% of residents make between 50k and 100k/year, and 9% of residents make over 100k. Mr. Lowe stated these real time numbers are better than any study. Mr. Lowe indicated a development schedule would call for demolishing of the existing building in spring of 2022 and construction would be completed in mid -2023. Mr. Lowe explained rental figures of 10 N. Main Street, and he indicated those figures have exceeded expectations. Commissioner Fitzgerald asked about the enhancements or changes from the original submittal to the submittal being proposed as part of this request. Mr. Lowe stated the western elevation has considerably more architectural interest, programming of the outdoor area has improved, and the trash enclosure area has changed locations. Commissioner Griffin asked about the retail space and what use will occupy the space. Mr. Lowe stated one tenant will be able to lease the space, hopefully a restaurant user. Commissioner Griffin asked about lighting and if there is any detail on the plan referencing lighting. Mr. Lowe explained the photometric plan is a condition of approval, and cut sheets will be provided in the future. Ms. Lambert indicated standard but attractive wall sconces are proposed to be included on the building. Commissioner Mizwicki asked about general downtown development. Mr. Lowe hopes to keep residents local and hopes this development will attract a high quality business in the retail space. Chairman Donnelly opened the discussion up to the public and swore in Kathy Pablanos, located at 1218 W. Sunset Road. Ms. Pablanos asked, will the parking lot proposed will be open to patrons or public to use related to the commercial space? Chairman Donnelly stated the parking will be open to the commercial space. Chairman Donnelly swore in Linda Waczy, 603 Windsor Drive. 143 Ms. Waczy asked about specific rental figures on the proposal and luxury rental market. She also discussed and requested a portion of the building to be mixed income. She stated the proposed rental figures on other, similar developments would be considered unaffordable for regular workers, specifically workers at the commercial spaces being proposed by these type of developments. She then explained the strategic plan the Village adopted earlier this year, which focuses on diversity, equity, and inclusion. She explained the development will be using public money as it is in a TIF district, thus a portion of the development should be equitable, and a portion of the units should be affordable. Chairman Donnelly swore in Adeline Menchaca, Chicago, IL. Ms. Menchaca explained that she would like a portion of the units to be affordable, as current developments like the one proposed have unaffordable rents for much of the working population. She further explained that Mount Prospect has a higher than average household income of over 200,000 dollars per year, and a lower than average household income of 40,000 dollars per year, meaning there is a gap in lower income housing. She then explained the strategic plan calls for equitable distribution of development and the proposal should include affordable units as such. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner about what was brought up by the public, firstly the rent figures. Mr. Lowe stated at 10 N. Main Street, a studio apartment averages $1,640, a one bed averages $1,900, a two bed averages $2,780, and a three bed unit averages $3,300 a month. He stated those figures do not include parking. Chairman Donnelly stated the affordable housing/mixed income questions will likely be a Village Board discussion, but asked the Petitioner if he had any comments on the questions. Mr. Lowe stated their team is proposing market level rental rates. He also stated the surface level parking would be available to the public or visitors, but overnight parking would be resident permit issued parking. Commissioner Beattie asked about affordable housing as it relates to the rest of the Village and other communities in the area. Mr. Cooney stated staff is proposing an affordable housing white paper which will touch on existing affordable housing in the Village compared to other communities, and what next steps can be achieved in meeting the strategic plan goal. Mr. Cooney further stated the Illinois Housing Authority (IDA) recently required 10% of all communities housing stock to be affordable, and that by IDA standards, Mount Prospect currently has 25% of its housing stock as affordable. Commissioner Beattie asked what affordable means or how it is quantified. Mr. Cooney stated it is a percentage of the average median income (AMI) of the area, upon which Mr. Harmon stated 60% of the average median income for rental properties is considered affordable, while 144 80% of homeowner's properties AMI is considered affordable. Mr. Cooney continued that if there was a housing need in the Village, it was the higher end rental apartments. Commissioner Griffin asked about the actual statistics for affordable housing in the Village. Mr. Cooney the 25% affordable housing number is a State produced percentage. Chairman Donnelly swore in Maryanne Benden, I Oka Avenue, Mount Prospect, IL. Ms. Benden asked about the affordable housing white paper- who will be preparing the documents, and when will the paper be available to the public. Mr. Cooney explained the 2013 Homes for a Changing Region report, and staff is taking recommendations from that document along with other State and Federal data sources to create the white paper. Mr. Cooney explained his staff is comprised with the other planners present along with one other planner, and overall it is a Village Board discussion item. Chairman Donnelly swore in Steve Polit, 605 N. Wilshire Drive. Mr. Polit explained and recommended it is a good idea to know how much money and effort goes into creating a plan such as the request before the Commission. He further explained it is a significant amount of money, and that it would be important for people to know how much money is being spent on this project, to date, and at the end of construction. Hearing no further comments, Chairman Donnelly closed the hearing. Chairman Donnelly asked the Petitioner if he is OK with the conditions listed in the staff report. Mr. Lowe stated that he is. Chairman Donnelly asked for a motion. Commissioner Fitzgerald made a motion seconded by Commissioner Beattie to approve the following motion: 1. A Conditional Use for a final planned unit development (PUD) consisting of a six -story, eighty eight (88) unit apartment and townhome building with three thousand five hundred (3,500) square feet of commercial space and sixty six (66) underground parking stalls, forty three (43) at -grade parking stalls, and eleven (11) at -grade garage stalls, subject to the following conditions of approval: a. Submittal of landscape, irrigation, and photometric plans that comply with Village codes and regulations; b. Visual warning devices shall be provided at the garage exit on Maple Street; c. In consultation with IDOT, a high visibility crosswalk shall be provided across NW Highway on the west leg of the intersection with Maple Street; d. Building materials shall reflect the copperstone, gray blend, and midnight black brick manufactured by Interstate Brick. Any alterations to any building material shall be approved by the Community Development Director; 145 e. The entire building shall be constructed with full, face brick veneer besides the 6th floor, which shall be a thin brick veneer; f. The Petitioner shall install new streetscape improvements along the property's Maple Street and NW Highway frontages; g. Fire hydrants shall be provided around the perimeter of the building at a maximum of three hundred feet (300') spacing measured along access roads. Such hydrants shall be installed not more than fifty feet (50') nor less than twenty five feet (25') from the building. Fire hydrants will be required within three hundred feet (300') (spacing) around the entire building. An additional fire water loop may be required depending on the configuration around the building; h. Development of the site in general conformance with the plans prepared by OKW Architects dated August 261h, 2021; and i. Development of the building in general conformance with the plans prepared by OKW Architects dated August 26th, 2021. UPON ROLL CALL AYES: Olsen, Fitzgerald, Beattie, Mizwicki, Szymczak, Griffin, Donnelly NAYS: None The motion was approved 7-0 with a positive recommendation to the Village Board. After hearing one additional case, Commissioner Beattie made a motion seconded by Commissioner Mizwicki and the meeting was adjourned at 8:46 PM. Connor Harmon Senior Development Planner 146