HomeMy WebLinkAbout4148_001Next Ordinance No. 410
Next Resolution No. 43=o,9
VILLAGE CLERK
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S 8
REGULAR MEETING
,X,Z1 was
fez
s;
m
nap///
may
w/m/
m
,e
Meeting Location: Meeting Dat— 's
Meeting ROOM, 18t Floor
senior citizen Center Tuesday 0,4/11
50 South Emerson Street October 17, 49ag7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
1. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald 11SkiP11 Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION - Trustee Floras
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, October 3, 1989
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. Fire Prevention Week, Poster Awards
VII- MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATION: HALLOWEEN, October 31, 1989
B. Employee Recognition - Fire Department
C. Request for new owners of Pepe'S, 208 E. Rand,
to continue doing business under the existing
Class "ROO liquor license
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. 2nd reading Of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I
OF CHAPTER 17 ENTITLED "VEHICLE LICENSES"
This Ordinance creates a vehicle sticker fee
for privately owned school buses.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 59-V-89, 1512 Larch Drive
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a
6 foot setback from the rear property line instead
of the required 15 feet; a 6 foot side yard
setback instead of the required 10 feet; to allow
a 4 foot high fence instead of the required 41 611;
and, to allow an above ground pool to be located
one foot from the utility easement instead of the
required 15 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended denying these requests by a vote 4-0.
B. ZBA 60 -SU -89 and ZBA 61-V-89, 2234 W. Lincoln Street
The Petitioner is requesting a special use to allow
a 3 car garage and variations to permit a garage
792 square feet in size rather than the permitted
600 square feet and to allow a 30 foot driveway width
instead of the permitted maximum of 21 feet. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 4-0.
(Exhibit A)
C. ZBA 65-V-89, 214 North School
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit
a 4 foot separation between the principle structure
and the existing detached garage. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this variation by
a vote of 4-0.
W. Request of Modification from Development Code,
1000 East Cardinal
The Petitioner is requesting the eliminating the
requirement for sidewalks on the cul de sac, in
conjunction with the development of subdivision
with 7 single family homes. The Plan Commission
voted 4-3 to grant this request. Also requested
is a reduction in the lot depth on lots
and 7 to less than 120 feet. The Plan
Commission recommended granting the request by
a vote of 7-0.
E. Safety Commission Report:
1. Request of residents to prohibit left turns onto
eastbound Ivy Lane from southbound Burning Bush Lane.
The Safety Commission recommended approving this
request by a vote of 8-0.
2. Request of residents to prohibit right turns from
Ivy Lane and Moki Lane on weekdays 4 PM to 6 PM.
The Safety Commission recommended prohibiting left
turns from northbound River Road onto westbound
Ivy Lane, weekdays 4 PM to 6 PM. by a vote of 8-0.
3. Request from businessmen for 4 -way STOP at
Business Center and Feehanville Drives. The 0
Safety Commission recommends approving this
request by a vote of 8-0.
X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT
A. Change Work Order #1 for Prospect Avenue
improvement, between Emerson and Main Streets
B. Proposals for consultant regarding elevated tank
C. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING JURISDICTION
OF CAMP MC DONALD ROAD BETWEEN WOLF AND RIVER ROADS
This Ordinance accepts the jurisdiction of
Camp Mc Donald Road between Wolf and River Roads
from the Cook County Department of Transportation. (Exhibit B)
D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A SUPPLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH THE
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
PERTAINING TO THE IMPROVEMENT OF WOLF ROAD
This Ordinance authorizes an amendment to the
Agreement with IDOT for the improvement of Wolf
Road to provide for casing pipes under Wolf Road
for future water main connections. (Exhibit C)
E. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION: Potential Litigation
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCTOBER 3, 1989
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Wattenberg
Absent: Trustee Leo Floras
Trustee George Van Geem
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Busse. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, APPROVE MINUTES
moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held
September 19, 1989.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 526,449
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
-
Community Development Block Grant Fund
10,556
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
9,691
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
58,851
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,826
Risk Management Fund
102,823
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 17,992
Special Service Area Const. #5
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
-
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989
-
Debt Service Funds
3,644
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
10,724
Police Pension Fund
40,275
Firemen's Pension Fund
311,645
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,094,476
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse,
Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
October 3, 1989 - Page 1
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None.
MAYOR'S REPORT
PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Farley proclaimed the week of October 8 - 14,
FIRE PREVENTION 1989 as Fire Prevention Week.
GERMAN/AMERICAN The Mayor also proclaimed October 6, 1989 as
German/American Day.
EMPLOYEE Mayor Farley and Police Chief Pavlock,
RECOGNITION: acknowledged the following employees and
POLICE DEPT. presented Career Employees Certificates of Service.
Plaques were presented to employees with 20 or more
years of service:
Name Years of Service
Robert Randolph 20
Andy Toth 20
Theodore Gorski, Jr. 20
Thomas Jacobi 20
Joseph Holanowski 15
Ernest P. Dettmar, Jr. 15
Michael J. Goy 15
Donald D. Gavel 15
Gary Helfenbein 10
David Behun 10
Jose Garcia, Jr. 5
Betty J. Griffin 5
David A. Okon 5
COMMENDATIONS: Mayor Farley and Fire Chief Cavello introduced the
following firemen/paramedics in order to present
Certificates of Commendation for outstanding
efforts in recent emergency situations:
Matt Canning
Mark Ceisel
John Malcolm
Tony Huemann
Tom Wilming
Don Burger
Bob Clark
Mayor Farley introduced Hank Friedrichs, Chairman of
the Fire and Police Commission, to administer the Oath
of Office to probationary firefighter/paramedics Kevin
Wilson, Peter Morris and Patrick Flavin.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 58-V-89 ZBA 58-V-89, 808 Edgewood
808 EDGEWOOD An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
allow a driveway 491 1011 in width. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote
of 5-0.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - October 3, 1989
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,
ORD.NO. 4100
moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4100
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 808 EDGEWOOD LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
RELEASE
A Resolution was presented that would authorize the
EXECUTIVE
the release of specified minutes taken during
SESSION
Executive Sessions. It was determined during an
MINUTES
Executive Session held September 19th.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
RES.NO. 42-89
for passage of Resolution No. 42-89
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE RELEASE OF
MINUTES OF SPECIFIED EXECUTIVE SESSIONS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented to accept the public
ACCEPT
-improvements installed in conjunction with the
PUBLIC
construction of the White Hen Pantry building
IMPROVEMENTS:
at 201 South Main Street.
201 S.MAIN ST.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to accept the public improvements at 201 S. Main
Street (White Hen Pantry).
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH.17
would amend Article I of Chapter 17 relative to
VEHICLE
the cost of a vehicle sticker for school buses and
STICKER FEE:
and certain not-for-profit organizations.
BUSES
It was determined that not-for-profit school buses
would be charged $10.00 per year for a vehicle sticker.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading
at the October 17th Board meeting.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Dixon presented bid results for
the following.
The following bids were received for the purchase of
FIRE DEPT.
a Fire Department squad:
SQUAD
Bidder Amount
Betten Rol Up $106,550
Hackney & Sons $119,090
Frontline $132,280
sumit Fire Apparatus $122,810
Page 3 - October 3, 1989
It was noted that the specifications for bid provided
for options such as heating/air conditioning and
electric reels. It was the recommendation of the
administration that the low bid include the option for
two cord reels for generator compartment at an
additional cost of $1,810.
BETTEN ROL UP Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the low bid received from Betten Rol Up,
including the option for electric reels, and authorize
the purchase of a squad for the Fire Department at a
cost not to exceed $108,360.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
DEMOLITION The following bids were received for the demolition of
1 & 5 S. PINE ST 1 and 5 South Pine Street, which are properties owned
by the village and included in the amended TIF
District.
Bidder 5 Pine 1 Pine Total
US Dismantlement $19,500 $14,800 $34,300
Martam Construction $11,000 $ 7,000 $18,000
Midwest Wrecking $14,750 $ 8,925 $23,675
Albrecht Ent. $ 9,()00 $ 9,000 $18,000
J.F. Hauling $13,500 $ 6,800 $20,300
Robinette Demo. $15,733 $ 8,733 $24,466
Trustee Arthur expressed his concern relative to the
need to demolish 1 South Pine,,noting that both
apartments are rented. The Village Manager stated that
the property is an eyesore and may need extensive
repairs, the cost of which may not be covered by the
rent. The Village Manager also noted that the rents
are not paid on a timely basis. It was also noted that
it is the intention Gf thf- staff to demolish 1 South
Pine Street in April.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the low bid submitted by Albrecht
Enterprises in an amount of $18,000 for the demolition
of both I and 5 South Pine Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Wattenberg,
Farley
Nays: Arthur
Motion carried.
COMPUTER EQUIP. Proposals were presented for the purchase of computer
equipment for various departments, as detailed in the
memo attached to these minutes.
Based on the proposals, it was the recommendation of
the administration to purchase the computer equipment
from Computerland of Mount Prospect.
Page 4 - October 3, 1989
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved COMPUTERIAND,
to waive the bidding process and authorize the MOUNT PROSPECT
purchase of specific computer equipment from
Computerland of Mount Prospect at a cost not
to exceed $19,629.00
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A report was presented outlining the proposed MELAS PARK
improvements for Melas Park, as required by the
MSD. The proposed improvement includes removal
of soil front the eastern portion of this parcel
and developing, leveling and seeding, and replacing
trees on the western portion. Mr. Dixon noted
that the cost will be shared by the MSD, the
Arlington Heights and Mount Prospect Park
Districts. The Village's share will be
approximately $100,000.
Herb Weeks, Director of Public Works, indicated
that the improvement would include temporarily
relocating and replacement of 75 trees
following the land balancing, removing the
plateau of the retention basins, and the
relocation of an existing storm sewer. The
quotes and proposed improvement plan as outlined
in the memorandum from Herb Weeks, attached to
these minutes.
It was suggested by Trustee Corcoran that while he
supports the proposed improvement, provided it does
not interfere with the annual Lions Club Carnival
over the July 4th holidays, he would like the
Mount Prospect Park District to reduce their
commitment to this Melas Park improvement to
writing.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to waive the bidding process and authoA:Izt.- she
Village to proceed with the land balancing and
tree removal as outlined by the administration, at
a cost not to exceed $72,245.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Village Manager presented the proposals from FOREST AVE.
consultants for the Forest Avenue reconstruction, RECONSTRUCTION
between Memory Lane and Kensington Road as follows:
Consultant Total
Brighton Engineering $27,000
Midwest Consulting $32,650
Triton Consulting $49,904
Tornrose Campbell $18,000*
*Incomplete proposal
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved BRIGHTON ENG.
to accept the proposal for engineering consultants
Page 5 - October 3, 1989
for the Forest Avenue reconstruction submitted by
Brighton Engineering in an amount not to exceed
$27,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AWARDS Mr. Dixon stated that the Village was recognized for
its method of salt storage and an award was presented
to Herb Weeks from the Salt Institute. Herb Weeks was
in Florida to receive the Greeley Award for his
contributions to the field of public works and to honor
his 30th anniversary in public works.
ADJOURN Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 6 - October 3, 1989
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1969
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
October 12, 1989
Cash & Invest. Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest.
Balance 9/28/89 Through Per Attached Journal Balance
9/28/89 10/12/89 List of Bills -Entry 10/12/89
$ 4,006,428
$285,359
$1,153,266
$<4,000> $ 3,134,521
792,779
91,397
134,760
749,416
2,607
20,000
22,543
64
141,615
8,249
54,641
95,223
3,611,432
219,709
605,989
3,225,152
225,032
6,003
4,153
226,882
1,084,622
20,582
89,721
1,015,483
640,114
4,793
36,951
607,956
346,003
3,909
219
349,693
506
-
3,731
4,000 775
1,324,843
9,339
-
1,334,182
4,240
2,944
4,133
3,051
1,473,671
12,673
30,464
1,455,880
13,821,419
18,785
8,969
13,831,235
15,720,861
17,010
10,396
15,727,475
277,725
350
-
278,075
$43,473,897
IZLI,102
$2.159.936
-0-$42,035,063
VILLAGE t3F MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE I
ACCC;UNTS PAYABLE APPRJVAL R1 PuRT
PAYME=NT DATE 10112189
VENDIIR
PURCHASE OESCRIPTI'J;:
INVOICE ANIJUNF
TJTAL
CLEAkING ACCJUdTS
A-1 MULLINS
3OND REFUND 04031
5100.00
ACCURATE PLBG
BOND RcFUND C6259
$100.00
AIROCM INC.
REFUND 05731
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
Alk SEAL JF L:HILA(;ULAND
60N R::FJAJ 06203
$100.00
$100.OJ
ARNOLD'S RESTAURANTREFUtD-PARKING
DEPOSIT
$100.00
$10(.00
_EN BEST
1EFUa'ND FINAL WATrR DILL
$75.00
S75.00*
BROWNING FFKRIS INDUSTRIES
REFUND FINAL WATER SILL
FINAL KILL OF INVOICE ,,FLOUD-93100J4
5.66
$6.84
$7.50
C. D. BUILD GROUP
PLAN REVIEW REFUND
$139118.00
513r118.00�
CITI`ANKr N.A.
PYMT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS
!70.00
S1,570.66
$70.00
CLAYTON AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CO
REFUND CONTRACTORS LIC FEE
S19570.66Y
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PYMT - HELFENBEli4
Si1.5U
!21.50
JUDY A. CJLLINA
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$224.25
$224.25*
COMBINED TAPING C PA1t4TMIt
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
kEFUND ;7F CONTRACT RIS LICENSE
S1.7t
$18.24
$20.00
CONROY SEWERAGE
BOND RZFUND 05810
$11.50
$11.50
COURTYARD KENNICJTT VENTURE
30NO REFUND C5021
Si00.00
$100.00
PAUL DE C 3S7Ei2
f4ATEtR !4� FUND
$100.00
$100.00
5bl.56
VIRGINIA JE PHILLIPS
SEWFK r..FUUD
30ND REFUND 01319
$5.94
$67.50
ERIC L. DERRILKSO;y
REFU%b FINAL WATE2 31LL
$100.Ou
$100.00
k31RSEMENT ACCIIUNT
REFUND FINAL WATER SILL
S.BB
S9. 12
$10.00
PAYRULL PERIOC ENDING 1015189
$355,186.58
�
PAYROLL PERIUO ENDING 1015184
$19171.08
PAYkf3LL PERIOD ENDING 1015189
$451.33
EEE HAULING9 INC.
PAYRiJLL PERIOD ENDING 1015189
$28x815.37
$3859624.36=
RONALD FAZZIO
FINAL MILL FLOOD DUMPING
$13w764.OU
$139764.00*
REF-Jlq;i FINAL WATER BILL
$9.12
FIRST NATIONAL DANK OF MT. PRJ
REFU'�J =INAL WATER BILL
DUE TO =EO DEP PAY OF
S.86
$10.00
iU15184
191770.74
DUE TO :=LD DEP PAY OF iU/5189T
587.45
�
DUE TO rED DEP PAY OF 10!5184
b33,g4
DUE TC =E0 DEP PAY OF 1015184
$2:108.72
#
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
DUE Ta' FFD DEP PAY OF 1015189
$662.77
51Zr6b4.123x
JEP LAKE REIMS 10112189
$19630.0b
�
MED ;BENEFIT REIMd 10112184
$29502.83
$49132.83*
VE NDJR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
FOUR M'S COMPANY
FULL GOSPEL CHURCH OF K
GARCU CUNSTRUCTION
GLENbARD INTERIORS
STANISLAW GKOCHOWSKI
3tRT F. HULL
L,LINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
J,R. .SONES FIXTURE
HENRY LINKER
ERICH MANG
MASTER WOOD CREATIONS
JAMES MATTIUZZI
L. MATTSON
JOHN MCKENNA
MISCELLANIOUS PROFESSIONAL LIA
D. MULCAHY
JAMES MURRAY
ANTI G RAFFAELLI
YOGI PATEL
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
LEONARD PETRUCELLI
ROBERT G. PICHLIK
RANDALL E. RAKOW
W. ROSENWUIST
SHAMStJCK .DEVELOPMENT
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION: INC.
VILLAGE OF MUUIiT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
-PAYMENT DATE 10/12/89
PURriiASE DESCRIPTIO INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND REFUND 06119
$135.00
$135.00
WATER REFUND
$27.61
SEWER REFUND
$2.64
530.25
BOND REFUND C4013
$100.00
lOC.OD
MOND REFUND C6013
$500.00,500.00
REFUND FINAL WATER
BILL
$6.84
REFUIND FINAL WATER
#SILL
$.66
$7.50
REFUND -'JF R/t TRANSFER
TAX 02204
$10 0.00
$160.00
EMPLOYEE SHARE IMRF
MONTH OF 9/84
$159227.33
EMPLOYE= SHARE IMRF
MONTH OF 9/89
$299642.40
$449869.73*
BOND REFUND 01747
$50.00
$50.00
MATER REFUND
$6.84
SEWER REFUND
S.66
$7.50
BOND REFUND 06197
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND C1649
$100.00
S100.00
WATER REFUND
$11.40
SEWER REFUND
$1.10
$12.50
BOND REFUND 06017
$35.00
$35.00
BOND REFUND C6178
$100.00
$100.00
INSUkANCE CLAIM
$259000.00
$259000.00
MATER REFUND
54.56
SEWEk REFUND
$.4=t
$5.00
BOND REFUND C451S
$250.00
BOND REFUND C4518
SZ5.00
5275.00
BOND REFUND C3457
$355.00
5355.00
WATLR Rt FUND
S.75
S.75
PETTY CASH EXPEN�,E
$35.03
535.00*
BOND REFUND 00880
$100.00
$106.00
MATER REFUND
52.26
SEWER REFUND
5.22
$2.50
WATEt REFUND
$20.52
SEWER REFUND
$1.98
$22.50
BOND REFUND C 5U s3
$ IUO.Op
BOND REFUND C520o
$100.00
SZO0.00
BOND REFUND 05914
$475.00
$475.00
MAINT BIND REFUND
$496L1.98
$49621.98
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE IU/12/89
VEND9R
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE COMMONS
WATER REFUND
89.12
VILLAGE OF MT PROSPECT -',
SEWER R--FUND
OCT TRF TO FIRE
$.88
$10.00
'l,8v
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCT TRF TO RISK MGMT
589969.35
469.35
$990.00
OCT TRF TO IMRF
526I.O6
OCT TRF TO IMRF
5169199.65
OCT TRF TO RISK MG,J'dT
$519780.00
OCT TRF TO CIRR
$20.61
OCT TRF TO RISK MGMT
$3239187.00
OCT TRF TO IMRF
$758.84
OCT TRF TO CIRR
$79433.00
OCT TRF TO GENERAL
$89t3Z6.01
OCT TRF TO GENERAL
85594113.46
OCT TRF TO TRUST
$225.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCT TRF TO GENERAL
OCT FRF TO MFT
$14v534.7e>
$478,819.-It 4
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCT TRF TO POLICE
$209147.011
8209147.00
$28*688.Z7
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCT TRF TO POLICE
OCT TRF TO MATER
$I09396.08
$399234.35
$49770.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
OCT TRF TO WATER
REINSPECT FEE 01747
$89500.00
$139270.00
$50.017
REINSPECT FEE 03457
$145.00
REINSPECT FEE 04518
#75.00
REINSPECT FEE 05414
$25.00
REINSPECT FEE C6€117
515.00
NORi3EX
REINSPECT FEE 06119
$15.00
5325.00
STANLEY WROdEL
BOND REFUND 0993
8104,17(}
$100.00
WATER REFUND
$39.21
SEWER REFUND
$3.74
$42.45
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$1#0709349.52
GENERAL FUND
$7649062.23 MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND
$89026.01
COMMUNITY OEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$29017.92 ILL. MUNICIPAL
kETIREMENT FUND
5549640.52
3LIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PETTY CASH - FLNANCE OLPT $49.15 s49.15*
PU8LIL REPRESENTATION DIVISIjN
GENERAL FUND 549#15
VILLAGE MANAGtR#S OFFICE
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
AMER ASSOC OF RETIRED PERSONS
P"ISTOL COUkT
.KE AND RYAiq
CALLAGHAN & COMPANY
GLASS9 HILL9 DALLMEYER Z kOTHv
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SCHWAAb, INC.
XEROX CORP.
CREDIT ck GLEN ANDLER AIRFARE PC 5/10
RE;,I-STKATIfiN
EMPLY R'LOG LUNCHEON
LEGAL '�LRVICES - AUGUST
FORMS
PR Os- r SSIC)NAL SERVICES �/69
EMPLY PH Y S
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT
UFFICE 3UPPLIEi
USAGE il-+8 COPIER
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
*44TOTA-t**
$62.00-
VILLASE LIF
M6J%T Prt.OSPECT
PAGE 4
$530.7-,3
ACCLUNTS PAYAbL-
APPROVAL REPORT
$62.50
$107.23
PAYMENT
DATE 10112189
54#396.55
VENDOR
PUkCHASE
DESCRiPTLin INVCICE
AMjUi,4T TOTAL
WATEK f SEA17k FUND
PARKING SYSTEM ",EVENUE FUND
S1Y736.28
RISK MAiNAGEMENT FUND
$25.57J-66
CAPITAL I,-4PkV. E REPL. FUND
54070.00
POLICE PENSION FUND
$8# 79.35
FIR!--MEN*S PENSION FUND
110#396.08
FLEXLOMP ESCkJW FUND
$-t I IJ 2. � 3
ESChGiN DEPOSIT FUND
$30*463.99
3LIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PETTY CASH - FLNANCE OLPT $49.15 s49.15*
PU8LIL REPRESENTATION DIVISIjN
GENERAL FUND 549#15
VILLAGE MANAGtR#S OFFICE
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
AMER ASSOC OF RETIRED PERSONS
P"ISTOL COUkT
.KE AND RYAiq
CALLAGHAN & COMPANY
GLASS9 HILL9 DALLMEYER Z kOTHv
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
SCHWAAb, INC.
XEROX CORP.
CREDIT ck GLEN ANDLER AIRFARE PC 5/10
RE;,I-STKATIfiN
EMPLY R'LOG LUNCHEON
LEGAL '�LRVICES - AUGUST
FORMS
PR Os- r SSIC)NAL SERVICES �/69
EMPLY PH Y S
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT
UFFICE 3UPPLIEi
USAGE il-+8 COPIER
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
*44TOTA-t**
$62.00-
$62.03
SIO.Oi
$10.30
$530.7-,3
5530.75
562.5;7
$62.50
$107.23
$107.23
X4P396.51,
54#396.55
$62.00
$69.92,
$77.30
$87.18
5333.oZ*
$32.55
$32.55
$54.80
$139.61
$194.41
VILLAGE MANAf,"EROS OFFICE *;:=;cTJTAL** 159687.01
VILLAGE JF wOUNT P-{OSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
rkYMtNT DATE It)/i2/89
VENDOR U rt.aSE UESC:,t TIJ`c INVOICE AMOUNT TaTAL
GENRAL FJND 15e6:37.0I
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
S TnAVEL AGENCY
-mac BALAGOT
LYNN BRAYT0N
CHICAGO SUEURItAN TIMES NEWSPAP
CORTEZ DIXON
KAREN FRAKI
HARPER COLLEGE
THE HERALD
MAGUIRE REELER LTD.
PHYLLIS MULIERe
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SEV
NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
TASCHO SAEMS
FfJANK SMITH
;NE TORP
WHIT= COLLAR SERVICES
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
AIR LIQ_ TICKETS - KAR;=N GILT NATOA
$269.10
$269.10
PAID VOLUNTEER
$10.00
$10*UO
PAIL? VOLUNTE=R
$10.00
$IU.00
AD
$88.00
ADVERTISEMENT - CA3LE TV DIV
SB6.00
3176.00
PAID VOLUNTEER
$25.Ou
s'-5.00
PAID VOLUNTEER
$25.00
$25.00
AD
$10.00
biG,U0
ADVERTIStM-NT - CABLE TV DIV
$106.40
AD - 44') 550248
$51.74
$158.14
VIDE':; S 1PPLIES
$52.5u
152.50
PAID VOLUNTEER
SIO.OJ
$10.00
SECUiITY SERVICES
$90.Ou
$90.00
RE.UE-AAL
$65.00
$35.00
PETTY L.iSH - FINANCE DEPT
$64.08
$64.63#
PAID VOLUNTEtR
$10.00
$10.00
PAIL? VOLUNTEER
$25.00
$25.00
PAID VOLUNTEER
$10.06
110.00
TEMP SECRETARY
S75.60
TEMP SE -CRY
1313.aU
$384.20
+#«TOTAL#r
$2#419.62
$i#414.62
CURTIS 13JO INCURPORATEO STATIONARY $542.45
VILLAGE '-)F 'IOUNT PROSPECT PAGE b
ACCOWNT', PAYA3Ls APPRUVAL kEPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/12/89
VENO JR PURCHASE DESCRIPTIuN INVUICE AMOUNT TOT At
FINANCE DEPARTMEfiT
VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE
INTEkNATIONAL INST. GF MUNICIP
ACCI�jE(J RC -PORT FURMS
$313.27
#355. 72
THE DRAWING BJARD,INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
162.74
St)2.74
GJVtrl,NMENT FINANCt LJFFflCERS,AS
APPLICA1101c. FEE
$375.00
$375.00*
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
57 3,-' S
$39203.66
339203.66
KELLY SERVICE.S.9 INC.
TEMP CL=RILAL S�:kKVICES
s204.38
5264.38
PETTY CASH - FINAINCE DEPT.
PCTTY CASH EXPeNlic
I ft. ou
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT
$1.75
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT
$.50
r-jERSEN L HOUPT
TRANSFli- TAX TRANSACTI-)NS 9/d9
$230.00
$230.00
PITNEY i5uWES INC.
POSTAGE
$174.00
$174.00
PuaLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$219.53
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$5.56
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$4.05
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$347.5r,
$385.b4
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERIES
Sc7.8ij
$27.80
VISIOLE COMPUTER SUPPLY CbRP.
MAILEKS
$144.53
tl44.53
XEROX CURP.
MONTHLY CHARGE Ftjk 1090 COPIER
$10910.62
USAGL 1'46 COPIER
554.30
USAGE 1J48 COPIER
$338.50
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$139.61
$29443.53
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$801T4.25
GENERAL FUND
$6 9 174.25
VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE
INTEkNATIONAL INST. GF MUNICIP
MEMEt-RSlilP FEES
$135.OJ
$135.00
INTERNATIONAL AUDIOv INC.
CASSETTES
$38.77
$36.77
JUUR!4AL F, TOPICS NEWSPAPEFS
SUBSL<I1 IPTION RE::NtWAL
$21.0u,
$21.00
NATIONWIDE PAPERS
PAPr-NWSLETT-R
$576.97
3576.97
PADDULK PJ3LICATIUNS INC
LEGAL NOTICES
$3U9.40
VENDOR
VILLAGE CLEkK#S JFFICE
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT*
VILLAGE CLEWS GFFICE
GENERAL FUNO
RISK MANAGEMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PAOSPECIT
ACLLUNTI PAYAbLE APPRLWAL RLPORT
P,tYMLNT DATE 1G/12/a9
PU,kCHASE DES�,RIPTLJN
LEGAL 4--ITICE'a
LE,.;AL ,�,OTICE
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
$IvJ=)5.73
PAGE 7
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$259.34
$ZO.00 $588.74
15.25 S5.z5*
*n*TOTAL** Slo3b5.73
FORT OEAR80kiN LIFE INSURANCE C
HIGH—LEVEL EXCESS LIAR* POOL
LIFE L"ISURANCE MJNTH OF 10/89
$19949.09
S I * 94 9.,)-4q
JACKSONv LONG & ASSOCIATES
HELP-PR,:MIUM
JACKSONvLONG 9/27-10/3
S359240.80
$35!24=x.33
$14,046.16
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
JACKS,UN LONG 10/4-10/1!1
REIMBURSEMENT
S10t890.41
$ Z 5 v �3 36. 5-;,*
$124.00
3IZ4.00�
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$63#150.48
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $639i50.48
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CJNTROL SERVIC R" NO
IAMFES
ERGO
SERVICES RIENUERED
SEf',VIC�S P=NOEREO
SERVICES RENDERED
SERVICES RENDERED
MEMBERS,-iIP RtNEWAL
S 240.0k)
$50.00
$130.00
$50.00
$50.00 $520.00
sb9.00 $69.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
VILLAll"t r MUuJ PROSPECT
$ t- 7. 84
PALE 3
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
ACCUUNT,i PAYA6LE APPROVAL RZPORT
$478,.44
$478.44*
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
P�YMCNT DATE 101121tzg
$43.80
$43.80
VENCOR
PURCHASE L)i-zSCRIPTIJI,,
INVOICE A.40U.',jT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
575 4 3x; S
34 Q. 0'
FRANK KRJPA
LLUTHIflot, ALLUWANCc
$43.70
$43.70
MAXON SHOUTtRS SUPPLIES: IkEo
SUPPLIL,')
S34.28
$34.28
NATIONAL SOCIETY OF PRGf;*�'EMI
MEMf-,R-LHIP
$191.00
$121.30
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MEMBL.RSHIP
$191.00
$382.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.,
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
54.00
PETTY CA Sti E X P t WS t
$2.00
PETTY CISH - FINANCE 0E -PT
$7.90
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DAEP T
310.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE CEPT
$1.00
$24.90*
QUALtXv INC.
PHOTj SUPPLIcS
$11.56
$11.56
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
SUBSCKIPTU-N R-N-t4AL
$12.01,
$12.Uk)
FREDRIC TENNYSON
COMP SUPPLIES
$121.91
$121.99
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
cLtVvTO, INSPECTIONS
310.02j
ELEV4TJ-� INSPECTIONS
t50.au
$100*ou
TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERSt L
CENTRAL RO IMPRVAT
$159424.92
$15:424.92
XEROX CORP.
USAG;-- 1048 COPIt-i
$33e.50
6338.50
INSPECTION SERVICES
--;.%*TOTAL**
$17*6b2.85
GENERAL FUND
$17,C'-,.65
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
SUPPLI-I,
$ t- 7. 84
$57.84
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
MOBILE P-HiONE
$478,.44
$478.44*
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
GASOLINE
$43.80
$43.80
ILLINOIS BELL TEL -::PHONE CO.
921 ) in G
$22.7
575 4 3x; S
34 Q. 0'
575 9 3" S
$150.00
$212.72
M A A C,?�
PAi,-'�l CA,<
521-J3.0L
$293.00
MOUNT PROSPECT W90LESALE AUTL;
AUTO PAI'TS-3EPT
5121.3-
$121.30
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSPS
55.25
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL RLPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/12/89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESLRIPTIL)N
INVOICE AMUUNIT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
MISC Eft' ENSE S
197.66
MISC EXPENSES
$5.95
MISC EXPENSES
$27.96
MISC EXPENSES
$12-50
MISC EXPENSES
$25.86
OF ILLINOIS
MISC EXPENSES
33.00
$183.18*
CABLE - POLICE DEPT
$9.00
$9.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$19399*23
GENERAL FUND
FIRE f. EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADDISON 3UILDIN6 MATERIAL CC).
S U P P L I t' ---S
DENNIS AMBER
EXPENSES
$7.90
$7.90
JACK GENDER TRAILERS
TRAILER
$229.29
5224.29
BOWEN C ASSOCIATES: le4C.
TUITION
519660.00
slf6o u .�o
,N LiREZINSKI
TRAINING
$850.00
i6-5o.uo
ouSSE HARUW ARE
PL8G SUPPLIES
$50.00
15u.00
s35.70
SUPPL I L- S
$16.96
SUPPLIE'S
$9.09
PLOD SUPPLIES
$33.39
CHARTERHOUSE PJ8LISHING CO.
PL3G SUPPLIES
FORM3
$8.50
$103.64
CHICAGO COMMUiNICATiON SERVICE*
REPAIRS
$2I.43
$21*43
$166.50
REPAIRS
$32.50
REPAIRS
155.06
COMMONWEALTH E31SUN
RE PAI R3
t4A77-JT-2404-A
$53.00
$257.00
COMPUTEkLAND
RIBBj%S
$5. 57
58-57
COMPUTER SUPPORT LENTRES
TU I TI oti
$65.00
3i55.00
$195.00
$195.00
VENDOR
FINE G EMERGENCY PqJTECTION DEPT.
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
EDUCATION ALLIANCL
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
THE FOkMS GROUP
U.S.AUTU GLASS L__NTcRv INC.
GOODYEAR SEkVICL STURCS
GREAT LAKES FIRE -EQUIPMENT
h_Elo AUTO FAINT L SUPPLY
H R HART PHUTO
IG'Ev INCORPORATE!.)
ILLINOIS ;SELL TtLcPt-(ONE CO.
KAk PRODUCTS INC
RAYMOND KORDECKI
LAB SAFETY SUPPLY
M.A.B. ENTERPRISES? INC
METROMEDIA PAGING SERVICES
MINULTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS9 INC.
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
MOTOROLA CELLOLAR SERVICE INC
P"A AUTO PARTS
I A -HEIGHTS AUTu'l0TIVE SUPPLY
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
OBERLIN FIRE & SAFETY' INC.
ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
ERIC Eo PlEt
QUAL`Xv INC.
RED WING SHOE STORt
VILLAGE JF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
MICHAEL WAGNER & SONS* INC.
WESTZkl'i ;:NGIN_- LOMPANY
VILLAGE uF '�JUNT PKOSPcCT PACE 16
ACCoJNTj_ PAYA3L_ APPROVAL RtPiRT
PAYMIENT DATE 10/12/89
PUR;_HASE DtSCRIPTION INVC[Cc AMOUNT TOTAL
FART;;
$18.75
$18.75
COMPiTL-1 SURPL1tS
$104.95
$104.95
Pic l' i I: q45 EXPNS7_}
$237.00
8237.00
Fol�o, �
$125.35
SI25.35
REPAIR,
$172.96
$172.96
TIRr_
$72.59
$72454
SUP'LIt'-,
$96.48
CLJTHIN(-,
$11824.00
$19920.48
SU PP L I;- c
$57.25
$67.25
PHOT] SUPPLIES
$115.51
$115.51
OXYGcN
$16*00
jXYGcN
$10.03
0 X Y G __- N
$16.01)
$48.00
575 9 3, S
$50.00
560 9 il G
$ 1 ob. 03
$156.03
PAR'S
$142.13
5142.13
E x P ___ N S E 3
$50.00
$50.00
SUPPLIES
$34.7c
$34.76
SU PPL I t-
5-N8. 90
556.90
PAGt:4 MAINT
$355.62
$355.62
SUPr'LIt
$32.00
$32.00
RI L, , J u N-1, S
3280.0'1 1
$280.00
o59--� 40
$71.36
8-71.36
SUPPLIEl_
$Z1.50
$21.50
SUPPLIS
$11.751
SUPPLlts
$52.U9
Sb3.84
8 A G
$30.59
$30.59
F1 RE E_ X T I N G U I S H E S
t 1 t Od5. iG
$19085.10
SUPPLI-E'i
$426. 81
$426.01
SERV i Cis
$48. 017
$48.00
PHOT:.j SUPPLItS
$15.75
$15.75
SH -U, 'a-' �
1293.10
$293.10
TUITiN,'v
549 800.00
$4v300.00
SUPPLI_�S
$218.80
SO PIP L 1
$35.82
$254.62
SUPPLIC'`
$26.33
$26.33
VENDUR
FIRE L EMERGENCY PRUTZCTIUN DEPT.
WHE - LE -N ENGI NEER IN,,; COMPANY
RAYMOND YUUNG
FIRE Q- E;AERGENCY PROTECTIMN DEPT.
G.-- NE N AL F U �j 0
V ILLAG& OF MOUNT PKOSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1u/12/89
PJRC-HASE UESCRIPTION
SU PP L I L -,
Ex PE IN St s
INVOICE AMOUNT
$91.83
$114.30
MEELtollum
$11 oz L4 9. z 4 CAPITAL 1,-;PkV- & RCEPL. FUoQ
PAGE 11
TOTAL
$91.83
18114.30
Sl4w783.24
$39484.00
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVIC--S RENDERS -0 — OCTOBER $31,385.00*
CENT2AL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $319385.00
$31P335.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CJ.,INC.
SENIUR CAB RIDES
$513.00
ARA/CURY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
COFF7E
$513.00
LEONARD W. BA LAN
HDM RIVER REIM3
SEPT
$134.00
$134.00
CHANNING L. BETE COMPANY, INC.
PUBLIC41IONS
$21.00
$21.00
SHAR-JN BLAZEK
HDM �)klvE REIM5
SEPT
S-16.00
$24#77
$36.00
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
SUPPLIES
CAMILLE CHMELA
HOM DRIVE REIMB
SEPT
$113-4U
$113.40
MICHAEL ODROSH
HDM L)RIVER REIMB
SEPT
$6.00
56.00
ELK GROV'--:* TAXI
SENIOR CAB RIDES
$6.00
$6.00
JUDY FELL
t X P E N 5 ^e 11
$41.70
$41.70
$70.35
$70.35
VENDOR
HUMAIN SERVICES DIVISION
HAZEL FRICKE
So C. ANN JEAN GJC9LING
KARLA HEETER
ILLINOIS BELL TEL --PHONE CDs
RAY LUNOIN
EARLE MATrSGN
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
NANCY MORGAN
RICHARD NORAK
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
EL(JISL' PURCELL
OTTO SCHERR
JEANNE SH&RMAN
BERTHA I STEIL
VAN ORIELAS MEDICAL -SURGICAL
HUMAN SERVICES Di VISION
GENE RAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MiJUNT PAGSPECr PAGE 12
ACCOUNT; PAYABL& APPROVAL RcPuRT
P,YM'E^,J DATE IU112189
,'UxCHA:,E DESCRIPTION INVOICE- AMOUNT TOTAL
H311 LjRlVi7R
RcIMB
StPT
16. OU
$6.00
HOM !,R!Vt
RFIMB
SEPT
$6.00
$6.00
SUPPLI-':S
5232.77#
ANGELA CHIARELLO
$9.45
$9*45
375 `3 31,' S
K. A. M. CONSTRUCIION9 INC.
C Did, G
s230.00
5200.00
HOM DRIVER
REIM6
SPT
324.00
$24.00
HDM DRIVER
REIMB
SEPT
56.00
56.00
P L A Q J ES
$350.00
PLAQJES
524.00
PLAQUE
$12.50
S38t.50
EXPf-:NS--S
$150.00
$150.00
HOM ljk!VER
REIMS;
St: P f
$9.00
$9.00
PETTY CASH
EXPENSE
$97.55
$97.55*
HOM uRIVI-R
REIMS -
SEPT
$15.00
$15.00
HDM URLVER
RLIMb -
SEPT
$12.00
$12.00
HDM ORIVER
RLIMB -
SEPT
116.06
$6.00
HOM DRIVER
REIM3 -
SEPT
$12.00
$12.00
SuPpLif`�
$632*OU
SUPPLIES
531.70
$663.70
***TOTAL**
$21569.42
$295,59.42
**V *** ** *********.tet* v*# ******
PLANNING AND Z'UoiING OtPARTMENT
AREA UEVELOPMENT
ADV--TISEMENT
$21250.00
$2*250.00
BLALlw & SONS
C D 11, G
$49350.00
54056.00
C.D.L3.G. LOAN
CDtiG
5262.77
5232.77#
ANGELA CHIARELLO
WIRING SUBSIDY
$277.22
$277.22
K. A. M. CONSTRUCIION9 INC.
C Did, G
SlltSO0.00
$119800.00
ELLA HATE
WIRI c- ;UBADY
$328.88
$328.38
MICHAEL J. MORAN
S&<VIC�i k,--N-DEmcJ
$92.00
VENDER
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
P131 INSULATION
PETTY CASH — FINANCE
PLANNING RESOURCES
QUALEX, INC.
JOSEPH SALAMONE
SCHWAABv INC:
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
EUGENE SWIECH
MATHI LDA WINK LER
XEROX CORP.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
STREET DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNT`. PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/12/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SERVICE'S RENDERED
$125.00
$217.00
CD8G
$727.50
$TZTw50
PETTY CASH EXPENSE
$4.cz$
PETTY CASH - FINANCE
DEPT
$13.75£
PETTY CASH - FINANCE
DEPT
$22.50
PETTY CASH - FINANCE
DEPT
$4.40
�
PETTY CASH - FINANCE
DEPT
$32.98
$77.95#
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$533.00
$533.00
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$40.50
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$3.87
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$3.87
$48.24
WIRING SUBSIDY
$277.21
$277.21
STAMP
$52..00
$52.00
MEO SERVICES RENDERED
$1,133.33
$1,133.33
WIRING SUBSIDY
$282.77
$282.77
WIRING SUBSIDY
$282.77
52BZ.TT
USAGE 1048 COPIER
$54.61
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$139.60
$144.41
###TOTAL**
523,115..05
52,569.62 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$10,525.43
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BLDG MA€ERIALS-SEPT $25.44
BLDG MA€ERIALS-SEPT $46.79
BLDG MATERIALS -SEPT $53.E2
BLDG MATERIALS -SEPT $65.74
BLDG MATERIALS -SEPT $91.18
BLDG MATERIALS -SEPT $31.14
VILLAGE OF MdUtNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNT; PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
P,'AYMtNT DATE 10/12/89
VENDOR PUKL-HASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMCUNT TOTAL
STREET L)IVISICN
BLU3 MATERIALS -SEPT
$6.30
BLDG PlArt"RIALS-SEPT
$41.35
5361.06
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
SUPPLIT_s
$36.66
SUPPLIES
S53.00
SUPPLIES
$54.87
5i44.53
ALDkIDGE ELECTRIC, INC.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT
$10968.75
5IV908.15
AMEkICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
SUPPLIES
$155.39
SUPPLIES
$49.07
$204..+6
A,IR6BLAST INC*
SAN09LAST
$2131.00
$281.00
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
SUPPLILS
$146.19
$146.19
SUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH9
VEH WASH
$76.00
$16.00
R. 1. 8USSE INC.
DIRT - SLEPT
$639.00
$639.00
CAGE INDUSTRIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$501.00
$501.00
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SU PP L I E'S
$429.12
$429,.12
CHICAGO TORO TURF G IRRIGATION
PARTS
$227.61
PARTS
$218.94
PARTS
$10.53
PARTS
5I0.53
$467.61
ARTHUR CLESENt INC*
GRASS SEED
$214.00
SUPPLIES
$1,#070.00
$19264.00
LLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM RENTAL
177.3L
UNIF--R,ll RENTAL
$15.33
UNIF-"'R'4 RENTAL
$77.81
JNIFJRM RENTAL
$16.89
5187.83
k FORT SUPPLIESi INC.
SUPPLIES
$70.75
$70.75
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
STRELT LIGHTING* AUGUST 1989
59,p022.49
STRELT LIGHTINGv AUGUST 1989
$59185.19
$14*207.68
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
CLEANI',aG SERVICE
$1#835.00
CLEANINu PISTOL RA?,,GE
siza.uO
CL--ANING SERVICE
$1,836.0G
CLEANING OF PISTOL RANGE
$128.00
$39928.00
CONRAD AND SON
JFFILE EQUIP
$2,439.41
$29439.91
CuUK COUNTY TREASURER
TRAFFIC IGNAL MA INT
$1,196.84
SIf19b.84
DECKER SUPPLY CO., INC.
SUPPLIES
$688.00
$688.00
DON3HUEq HETHERINGTON & ASSOCI
CONSULTING FEE-. - MELAS PARK
$2,006.011
$29306*00
EAST PkAlnIE PUBLISHING CO.
PUi3LICArION
$28.90
$28.90
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
ElDnAKJS COMPANY* INC.
ENGINEMASTERS* INC.
EXCEL MAINTENANCE SERVICE -
FALCON FASTENERS INC.
FORBES INCORPORATED
?cST TREE SERVICE. INC.
HELLER LUMBER CO.
HENURICKSEN TREE EXPERTS INC.
HI-LINt CONTRACTORS
RAYMOND JANSER
CHARLES KLEHM E SJN NURSERY
KARL KUEMMERLING9 INC.
LACEEiARK PUBLICATIONS
LAND AND LAKES CO
L�*iZ5 INTERNATIONAL INC.
}YD LISS.
MARTAM CONSTRULTION* IivC.
MEILNER MECHANICAL SALES* INC.
MORT_)N GRUVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS E SONS
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
MOUNT PROSPECT LAWNMOWER
MUNICIPAL ARBURISTS L URBAN FO
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NATIJNAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SER
NEON MATERIALS COMPANY
NORTHWEST ELELTRICAL :SUPPLY
aILLAGc OF MJUNT PROSPECT
ACCOU.NTa PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/12189
i'URCHASE DESCRIPTIJN
SE RVIC
PARTS
TURF MJ'r; ING
SUPPLIt'i
REPAiR
TREE TRI MMpjG
TREE R;z,IOVAL
TREE TRIMMING
LUMESt:R SUPPLIES
LUMBrak SUPPLIES
LUMt'ER SUPPLIES
LUMErR SUPPLIES
REMOVE TREE
SUPPi_ I E'er
SI+JEwAL,t REPLACEMENT
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PUBLICATION
REFUSE FISP SAL -SEPT
REFUSF DISPOSAL -SEPT
MOOEC ,,1710 FORD NEW HOLLAND
SIDEWAL< REPLACEMENT
PRUSt, CT AVE RECJNSTR
SUPPLIE.:i
REPAIRS
5UPP+_ 1 L
AUTO PA,v TS -SEPT
REPAIRS
MANUALS
SUPPLIES
ALARA StkVICt
SIGf4 `iACHINE EQUIP
ELEC SUPPLIES -SEPT
ELEC SUPPLIES -SEPT
ELEC SJPPLIES-SGPT
R^ACHIN
PAGE 15
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$253.82
$253.82
$78.74
$78.74
$8!230.00
38*230.00
$92.94
$92.94
31*785.00
SLV785.00
$ 1 v 49 3.40
$110'79.83
$2*190.32
$4*783.55
$47.36
$14.40
$192.35
$29.60
$283.71
5380.00
;380.00
$116.6
$116.62
sd2.o.
$82.00
$120.0u
5267.00
$337.00
$14.85
$44.85
$38.00
$33.00
$ 360.Ou
$360.00
$7ZO.00
$26.2J7.06
52692U7.00*
$82.00+
182.00
S108*OS7.26
5IOd*u97.Z0
s50.2u
$50.20
$55.00
$55.00
$76.92
$76.9,2
's556.iu
$556.10
$131.75
$131.75
$5.00
S5.U0
$269.99
$269.99
$25.00
$25.00
$2Y358.00
$2*358.00
$53.79
$10.19
$697.69
$761.67
VILLA'SC 13F MOUNT P40SPECT P A -S E to
ACL,-Iui%T'- AYA.4Lt APPKUVAL RcPuRT
PAYMLNT DATE 10/12/89
V I NJ �Jpl 'UR,'l-,HA'l')E DESCRIPTION INVOICE iMOJNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT
522.0L
PETTY CASH - PU3LIC WORKS
TkAVl,-L - SUPPLIES
;3.37
PETTY CASH EXPENSL
$2.13
PETTY LASH EXPENSc
$155.40
$16U.90*
PRP -SAFETY
SAFtTY Vr-STS
$41.70
$41.70
RLJWLAN04S EQUIPMENT# INC*
PAkTi,
$21.51
PAqT'S,
$21.59
$43.10
INION EQJIPMENT CO.
SUPPL 1
$37.73
$31.73
h-NRY SCHMITZ
SIDEWALr( R --PAIR
582.00
$32.00
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
ilv340-04
51*340.U4
SEARS* kOtBUCK AND COMPANY
Ml SL IJJLS
$49.08
$49.08
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
PEST CONTRJL - OCT
$40.00
PEST CONTROL - OCT
s 4 0. OiD
PEST CJ'4TRjL - OCT
$40.0u
PEST CUN-TROL - OGT
$40.OL
PEST C DA T ROL - OCT
$40.013
PEST C ON T Rj,) t - DCT
$40.00
$240.00
STATE TREASURER
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MA IN Tr' NAN CE
S I ja . 2-t
TRAFFIL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
$177.59
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
$313.05
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINTENANCE
$437.85
S 1 v 0 3 6. 7 3
SUN OFFICE EQjIPMENT CO., INC.
SUPPLIES
b15.DO
$25.00
TCI JF ILLINOIS
CABLE PU3LIC WiG R K S
$12.75
512.75
T' -CH SYN CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$2.32
$2.32
.ALTA CJNSTRUCTIONq INC.
CJ,NH & ':-UTTER P�t-JGRAM
$IL7#3-t6.7b
$117#346.7t,
K. VAN 3OURGONIJIU"4 L SOI49 INC.
bULH,
I b 3. 3,1
$163.36
VANS AKTISTS DESIGNERS SUPPLIE
SUPr°LEr
$16.24
$16.29
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
I S - lti- ST
$47.56
$47.50
WAki'41NG LITES OF ILLIAJIS
SUPS=LILI
i,19615.55
SUPPLILS
$55.67
$1#671.22
WERNcR wEIS6RL)D
SIU*Ew4AL< R'Z-PLALEMEJT
$82.06
$62.00
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
SERViCc CALL
b114.00
3114.00
STRE�T DIVISION
***TOTAL**
63107143.11
GENERAL FJND
CAPITAL !MPRV. L REPL. FUND
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
-1IU:N FENCE CONTRACTORS* INC.
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
AMERICAN WATER WJkKS ASSN.
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
8 L H INDUSTRIES
BUSSE tlT. PROSPECT AUTO MASH,
R. 1.BUSSE INC.
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
C FAX MELDING FABRICATING
f SMONIrEALTH EDISON
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS 4AT*L UK
DIPAiLO COMPANY
DONOHUE L ASSOCIATESI INC.
E & H UTILITY SALES
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO.
JOSEPH D. FOREMAN L CO.
v ILLAGL -F '1'3U'vT PKGSPECT
ACLJJNT< PAYABLE APPR3VAL RcPUkT
PAYMENT DATE 10112189
rUKt,HAs= DESLR€PTItiN
$i5 -r:711.33 MOTUR FUEL TAX FUND
$2o1bf6.91
PAGE 17
INVCICL AMOUNT TOTAL
$i261734.27
REPAIR FENCE
8530.00
$580.00
nLOG MAIERIALS-SYPT
$07.66
567.66
ANNUI'L DUES
6761.00
5761.00
PARTS
85.35
55.85
MAINrENANC- CONTRALT
1550.Oo
REPAIRS
$129.08
REPAIRS
$335.21
51T•3I4.29
SUPPLIc'
$13.11
$13.11
VEH ,iAti) 4
$56.Oii
$56.00
DIRT - SEPT
T639.00
$639.00
SUBSCk1:'TIO'14
$21.sc!
$Z1.88
UNIFDRM RENTAL
$17.81
UNIFORM RENTAL
$15.31
ONIF;JR+N RENTAL
$77.80
UNIFORM RENTAL
$16.89
$187.62
SUPPLIES
SIVOJ$.96
811008.96
4372 -JI -56093-D
$307.79
$361.79
OPER L MAINT CiJSTS-JAMA
$23132d.O0
VILLAvL SHARE FIXED CiJSTS-JAWA
$1(177492.06
LAKs MATER PURCHAS -J'AWA
$II01661.0u
1,2411481.00
SANITA;Y SEWER, CENTRAL kD
$3,750.00
$3,750.00
SANITARY SEWER REHAB
5116)4.96
SANITARY SLWER Rt_HABILITATION
5111210.54
SANITAr,Y SEWER REHABILITATION
$607.39
$131512.94
FIRE HYDRANT
811610.10
51,610. 1U
SUPPLI--'.
$36.06
SUPPL l t -'S
3Z4.O6
560.00
CREDIT 3EM0
$900.00-
SUPPLI S
$750.00
-SO PF? LICS
573.36
`) ILLA.E uF MOU_'tiT PRGSPELT P AG 71 1 a
.ACC(,_lLjNT, PAYASLc APPROVAL kLPORT
PAYM--NT DATE 10/12/89
V E N�" 0 R kllw"rHASE D,csCRIPTI"_-%, INVCIC'._: AMLitiNT VITAL
WATizf,, AND SEWt:R L)IVISIJP4
SUPP , I ,_ S
S I Do. 96
$96.32
GREELEY AAD
519572.73
S1v572.73
H -E-< WATER ',IETEm SERVICE
EXLMANG_:j
5515.70
__XCHANG - s
S li 005. 78
m A T 1, M-_TE� kEPAI,,', CjNr;lACT
$133.41
?CATER M- I 1JN a 1A LL A I I Uf
5113.14
$ 1 * 8 10. 0 3
HUWi:LL TPACTUR L EQUIPMENT CO.
PARTS
$32.30
532.30
ING-IS 3ELL TELtPHONE CO.
575 v Sig -S
f3u000
347 9 3G S
$1,2.80
5362.80
INSlTUFijk,,%i PlIDWE.-,)T
SA NI T A kY S=WHR RrC INSTR
$081850.0,)
$689850.00
JCE-L KENNZ0Y CONSTRUCTION Cj.
SANl I AkY SElAcK KEHAB
$33v3u0.0'
PROSI, M�AO&43 StmER RcHA8
$719824.56
E105*124.50
LAND AND LAKES CU
REFUSE _)ISP0SAL-S'_,-PT
536G.X
$360.00
LASF-Y,Z- ELECTRIC CL)
REPAIR
$86.i
536.00
MlDmST CUNTRACTJxS EQUIPMtNT
SUPP4 -Ir_0
3
i 6'34. u 3
MOUNT PROSPECT WHULE SAL -_i AUTO
AUTJ PA=TS -SEPT
55.8. 5L)
158H.55
NAPA AUTO PARTS
S U P P L I _',
124.78
$24.78
NORTHWE,T E-L-ECTRICAL SUPPLY
>-Lt�C SJ'PeLIES-SENT
$ij6.94
eLcC SUPPLIES -SEPT
530.10
rLcC SUPPLIES -SEPT
532.16
1155.21)
ORR SAFETY EQUIPMc:NT COMPANY
-QUIPM_-'iT
s ZIP 5 7 B. 96
EQUIPM--i'IT
$21760.00
$59338.96
PADDOCK PJ8LlCATIlJNS INC
L!=GAL
GAL Nr)T ICE
$20.ou
3210.00
PTTY CASH - PUBLIC WjKKS
TRAY. -L S U P SLI'- "S
119.4-
51'9.4:-
TRAV� L
TRAV�L SU P P L It
5170. JO
PETTY !ASH EXPt',4'i
Si8.3-)
PETTY CASH PXPENSt
$20.25
PuSTIASTI ' R
eqAF�-- �sILL PuSTAilE CYCLf 294
o40b.14
s4jb.14�,
PROiAFETY
SAFI--TV VLSTS
$41.71-
$41.70
RAIN3OW I Hk PHUTEXP.
t:ILM PK�3CL-SISING
$8.31
$6.39
TLCH SYN LORP,_�KATIJN
SLJPLILIL__>
$126.0c
supt'LIES
$40.19
5114.19
TEkKALE SUPPLY COMPANY
,i E L 0 1 ;N -l' SUPPL I =S
$2.95
14ELDINu S, UP P L I ': S
$34.51
supp IT
$60.18
THE TEXWIPE Cd,,'PA'4Y
OF IF �UPPLlts
$35.71
$35.71
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
WATER AND SEWER DIVISIlift
WATER & SEWER FUND
VILLAGE JF MOUNT PKOSPECT
ACCCjUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL R'LPORT
PAYMENT DATE 10/12/89
Y;UKCHA�E DESCRIPTIIjf,,
SLI PP L I -- S,
S,+51j424.98
INVGICa AmLijNT TOTAL
5215.00 3215.00
***TOTAL** $4519424.98
*!;**-' **** ;2c*v* * ******** ** ***,D:* ***** ****** ** ** **V;***
PARKING SYSTEM JIVISIJN
CHICAGO E NORTHWESTERN TRANS C
COMMJDOkE MAI NTE 14ANCE SYSTEMS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEA DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
bkOWL',ING FEkRIS INDUSTRIES
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
LAND LCASE—SEPT
CLEANING SFR
I VICE
CLEANI'Ta SERVICE
I'? E NORTHoiEyT HwY
RECYLLL-;G PICKUP
RECY'LLING PICKUP
Si4094i6.46
$2TI29.11 $29129.11
$140.00
$140.00 $280.00
17.50 $7.50
***TOTAL** $29416.61
$135,597.96
5129818.50
***TOTAL*r
i1489416.4e>
***** *;cc *:: :0: *** **** **** *** ** ******* **c. **3�: *** #* ***;, ******* **###* ** ** ** ** ** *4:**** ***** ** * ** ** ** **
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMtiqTS
BUKKL AND RYAN
WEST TD `4 PLFRIGEKATION CORP.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
CORPORATC PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV
vILLAGr- JF -11-;UAT PROSPECT P AG, t- 20
ACCOUNTj PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
P'IYMLNT DATE 10/12/89
-j-,CHASE OESLkIPTIUN INVOIC- AMOU.,4T TJTAL
LE�Ai- `-kVICES - AUGUST 1218.75
LEGAL �-:RVICLS - AJGUST $31.25 S230.00
13#7�—J.00 s3f70U.00
***TOTAL*- $3@953.00
$59751.25 DOWNTOWN -,E-,EVL?)M-T CU -"IST 1%,5 $213.75
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PETTY LASH - FINANCE DEPT $4.00 $4.60*
COMMUNITY AND LIVIL SERVICES ***TCTAL*v' s4.uo
GENERAL FUNS 64.00
*^*** ** **** *il; *t�**
PENSION FUNDS
FIRST NATIONAL b4:iK OF MT. PR6
41TH-IOL:)ING TAX'LS
$200.00
$20U.00
CHARLES 'oi. NICK
PE�610E,4 — NICKC
$883.21
$383.22
VILLAGE OF MLJUNr PROSPECT
NOW MEDICAL INS
1,346.33
S34b.33
PAUL H. 4ATKI�4S
QCT EP DISASIL11Y BENEFIT
$IV620.5,)
SL962U.513
Pc'NSI LIN FUNDS
***TOTAL**
S3vU!)0.05
VILL AG,- OF MLUiT PROSPECT P A 21
ACC,)(JNTS PAYAbL,- 4PPkl)4AL KzPORT
P�YM,zNT DAFT 10/12/39
!,R O-EiCkIPTI )P, INVCICEL ;;mwva T�.ITAL
uta`i k A L F JNJ f
ALL DEPARTMENTS TJTAL
$21159,935.41
DAT ,E RUN vlLLAGL OF MuUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22
TIME kUN 12.13.J5 AUUJNT� PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID—APPBAR
I �UMOARY BY FU14U 10/12/89
NO. FUND NAME
I GENERAL FUN"',
22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
23 COMMUNITY 0LVL;3MT 11LOCK GRANT
24 4LL. MUNICIPAL KETIREMENT FUND
VATER & SEWER FUND
46 'PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
-49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
Sl CAPITAL IMPkV. & REPLo FUND
53 CORPORATE PURPJSES 1989 IMPPV
'55 DOWNTOWN REL)EVLPMT CONST 1985
71 POtICE PENSION FUND
72 FIREMENIIS Pr-NSIJN FUND
73 FLEXCUMP ESCROW FUND
74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
HNEET413vilUmm,
$19153vZ55..84
$134v760.28
$22v543*35
$549640.52
$605v938.63
$4v152.89
$89v7ZI.14
$36#950.91
$31p731.25
$218.75
$8v909.35
$109396.08
$4,*132.83
$30v463.99
13NEFISMIDOORM
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL
REPORT
September 1, 1989 -
September 30, 1989
Fuad
Balance
Revenues
Expenses
Fund
General and Special Revenue
Funds
Au'l• 31, 1989
for
September, 1489
for
September, 1989
balance
Sept 30 1989
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
$ 4,437,198
$1,056,942
$1,400,433
$ 4:093,707
Community Development Block
Grant Fund
913 150
< 47,984>
46,082
6
145,242
Sb 4,594
Illinois Municipal Retirement
Fund
67,402
7,329
18,500
< 2,2>
44,682
30,04049
.Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
4,426,157
454,461
405,179
4'475,439
213,384
13 814
�
fi,J02
220,496
Risk Management Fund
1,039,093
150,710 +
90,422
1,099,441
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement Rept or
Corporate Purpose Improvement
Repair Fund
1119
640,368
10 366
:
38,809
011,925
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
(1985)
< 112,981>
324,452
3,189
_
< 112,981>
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund
(1987)
-
'
_
327,641
Debt Service Funds
1,157,216
29,484
3,644
e
�
1,183,056
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
-
-
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
13,917,262
122,739
-
13,999,726
Benefit Trust Funds
16,030,558
3,568
136'684
311,046 11,646
15,855,601
274,156
277,724
43 008 3
2,410637$2,515.534
$42,923 946
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD O5 ENDING 9/30/19
1988-89 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
TAX REVENUE
43.750
190.116
1-000-00-4011
TARES -CUR PORATE CURRENT
1.410.500
1-000-00-4002
TAXES -CORPORATE PRIOR
1.767,100
1-000-00-4004
TAXLS-GARUAGE C:?RAEjf
735,600
1-400-00-4005
TAXES -GAR UW PRIER
833,200
L-JOU-00-40tO
TAXES-POEARDG CURRENT
11.000
1-000-00-4011
TAXES-RD&BROG PktoR
Iz.000
1-000-00-4013
R,TAtLERS OCCUPATION TAX5.480,000
1-000-00-4014
SALES TAX -SPECIAL PAYMNT
9.328-
1-000-oo-4015
'cJRLIGN FIRE: INS TAX
239000
1-000-00-4016
AUTU RENTAL TAX
750
1-000-004017
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX
150.000
1-000-00-4018
FOOD & BEVERAGE TAX
475,000
1-000-00-4020
'LECTRONICS GAME TAX
12,000
L-OUO-00-4064
PIRSONAL PROP REPL TAX
5,205
L-JJO-OU-4065
PERSONAL PROP REPL RES
3.254.535-
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
973102.043
910.150
FEE REVENUE
I-UOU-00-4101 `)JILOING PERMIT FIEa
L-000-00-4102 =LfCTRICAL PERMIT FEES
1-000-00-4104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES
1-000-00-4105 PLAN EXAMINATION FEES
1-000-00-4t06 STREU t OPENING FEES
I -40O -00-410T VE4ICLE LICEMSE FEES
1-000-00-41483 DUG LV LNSf S
1-000-00-4109 LIQUOR LICENS,S
1-000-00-4110 BUSINESS LICENSES
1-000-00-4112 PUBLIC IMPR INSPECT.ONS
1-000-00-4113 RENTAL FEES
1-000-00-4114 FELS-8DARO OF APPEALS
1-000-00-4115 CENTEL FRANCHISE FELS
1-000-00-4LL6 9tLE SYS FRANCHISE :EES
1-000-00-4119 ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS
1-000-00-412U FALSE ALARM FEES
1-000-00-412L CABLE TV FRANCHISE
1-000-00-4123 LANDLORD/TENANT FEES
TOTAL FEE REV�4UE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
1-000-00-4150 SLATE INCOME TAX
I-ODU-00-415t STATE SALES TAX
1®000-00-4152 STALE INCOME TAX -SF PMT
1-000-00-4154 ;RANT-SR.CITIZEN TAXI
I-OOV-00-4155 FlIFST RIVER RURAL FPO
I-ODU-00-4156 EIPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS
1-000-00-4154 FLOOD RCINBURSEMENTS
1-000-00-416J RI.CYCLING GRANT
t-000-00-4162 GRANT-ILEC PlLtCE TRGN
1 -OCU -00-4163 GRANT -STATE FIRE TRAING
L-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX
1-000-00-4165 PERSONAL PROP REPL R&8
PAGE
UNRtC`D It
BALANCE BALANCE BAL
587.705
43.750
190.116
31,215
34,884-
T36,Z90
1,776,(35842.1Oz
18,750
l,4t0,5U0-
1.4f0.500-
too -
306.500
t6-
30.000
9,758
9.758
t
347,165
837,864
19.853
735,600-
735,600-
too -
4.580
9.328-
9,328-
4.664
4,664
1
5,000
12.464
320
t1.000-
11.000-
100-
2,293.330
2.225.465
468,966964
3.254.5.35-
964
B
12.500
5,205
1.158
9l
3.254.535-
59-
973102.043
127,500
53,125
SZZ.609
11.343-
11.342-
9t-
444
23,000-
23.000-
100-
62'500
101,573
19.003
1.293
1.293
t7z
147,915
225.440
4t.794
48.428-
249.560-
48.427-
32-
5.000
9,200
9,200
2,800-
249,560-
53-
6.250
9.614
5.501
5.386-
2,800-
25-
30.000
12.500
14.667
0
4.545.8TS
,.19t,4U7
bOL,6780
5,7LH,704-
1.526
t5, 333-
15.333-
51-
12.000
5,000
5. 71H.743-
626-
225,000
43.750
190.116
31,215
34,884-
45,000
18,750
34:136
6,126
34,884-
t6-
30.000
/2.500
0.T
2.400
10.864-
10,864-
24-
45*000
1H•750
330,8S75S
5.568
9.328-
9,328-
31-
t,ODD
415
300
5p
t4.125-
14,t25-
31-
735,000
306#250
x2
115.874
12,102
Too-
700-
70-
12.500
5,205
1.158
9l
6t9.LZI-
619,L26-
84-
127,500
53,125
SZZ.609
11.343-
11.342-
9t-
Z10.0004,891-
11Z.500
101.496
6.596-
4.84►-
-k-
70.000
29.165
52,664
4.550
168,505-
1T,336-
L68.SU4-
62-
b:900
Z.875
I►.9Z51.240
5.025
L7.336-
25-
15•000
6.250
9.614
5.501
5.386-
5.025
73
30.000
12.500
14.667
5,586-
36-
90.000
37,500
37,466
1.526
t5, 333-
15.333-
51-
12.000
5,000
0
6.770
1,045
52,534-
52,534-
58-
7.500
3.125
2.385
655
5,230-
5,130-
44-
144,000
60.415
58.198
LZ,606
5.115-
5,115-
68-
409000
16 ,665
30e 163
595
86,802
86,802-
60-
f:907r400
716 74 0
841.088
84,524
9,837
9,837-
25-
L*066,315-
1.066,.312-
56-
1.57),000
654.165
724.749
130,570
845,251-
100.000
41.665
40.682
8,100845.251-
54-
149,525
83,766
54,318-
59.318-
59-
5,000
2,080
160
149.525
149,525
O
16.000
6,665
4.844-
4.840-
9T -
l2,000
5,000
Z.500
417
16,000
16,000-
!00-
9,500-
4,500-
74-
2.000
8,330
Z20500
22.15t
22.151
zz.5000
22,500
0
18 ,000
7.500
16,540
15.540
2.151
29t5i
11
155.Too
64,8 75
63,024
1,460-
1.460-
8-
2.SUo
1,040
ZTS.
92,67f-
920671-
60-
1,225-
2,225-
89-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTING PERIOD
05 ENDING 9/30189
1986-89
V -T -D
Y -T -D
CUR MO
GENERAL FUND
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
AC7 UAL
UNKtC.O
z
BALANCE
BALANCE
dAl
TOTAL INTERGOWLRNMENTAt REVENUE
Le 899.200
791-320
1.042.111
261.544
8S7,Otl 4-
StRVICE CHARGE REVENUE
857.Ob9-
45-
1-000-00-4175 M E S SERVICE CHARGE
1-000-00-4180 AMB ULANCE TRNSPRT
17`> 000
•
72.915
70.000
17x500
fEf
FJTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
40.000
12.665
19.025
2.461
105•000-
105.000-
60-
Z15,000
89.580
89.025
19,961
20.975-
20,975-
52-
PARKING RtYENUE
125.915-
125,975-
sq --
9-1-000-00-4216
1-000-00-4216Fl NES - LOCAL
130.000
5 4.165
1-ODU-00-4217 FINES - CIRCUIT COURT
180
75,
8,983
7!,440-
1-000-03-4218 FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES
1'000
42.060
42-060
tls862
71
TJTAL PARKING REVENUE
t.000
4t5
5
350137.921-
L25
13 T•9Z D-
77-
111,000
1Z9s58Q
lOi.. 970
11.970
650-
250-
65-
OTHER REVENUE
2i0•U;;-
210.010-
68-
1-030-00-4231 SALE OF CODE BOOKS
1-000-00-4235 RECYCLING INCOME
1.750
725
824
127
1-000-00=4243 SENIOR CENTER REVENUE
53,000
20.830
1.734
922-
926-
93-
'_0OO-00-4244 SPECIAL DETAIL REVENUE
!0,000
2,080
1x080
48.226-
3.420-
49.266-
97_
1-000-00'4245 REIMB-S ERYICESCPROPtRTY
4-165
5 .499
2.774
4.561-
39426-
78-
1-000-UU-4246 RLIMB - VOUTH COUNSELING
10.000
33.000
4.165
19.363
10.244
9,363
4.501-
45-
1-080-00-4247 PJE ICt C FIRE RePORTS
12.000
13.750
S•183
27•dlT-
9-383
4i
1-000-00-4148 INTERmST 1NCOME
140x000
5,000
4-248
901
7.USL-
27.617-
d4-
i-QOtr-00-4249 +iISCELLANLOUS INCOME
30 000
58.330
126.222
35,792
13.178-
7.052-
59-
"00-00-4251 MROT INTEREST OISTRIBUTN
25,000
8.361
1,032
21-639-
13.778-
10-
1-000-00-4253 INTEREST - ESCROW FUND
75.000
100415
i 3. 537
11.463-
21-234-
72-
1-300-00-4255 FLOOD LOANS INTEREST
21.400
31.250
{2.912
9,032
9.994
32.288-
11,463-
46-
1-000-00-4256 FLOW LOANS PR13CIPAL
5 2.700
81411
8.940
3.600
12.460-
32*288-
43-
1-000-00-4262 +TAINT- OF STATE NMYS.
42,500
21.540
3.600
23.645-
12,420-
58-
lID000-00-4264 REIMB - CENTRAL ROAD
54:600
17.705
22.268
12,268
20.232-
23.645-
Zb-
1-000-00-4270 TRANS FROM TRUST ACCTS
Z2. 750
78,504
8,026-
25.904
20.232-
48-
;-000-00-4ZT3 SURVEILLANCE REVENUE
[3,904
+.�.
1-000-00-427S SHAREO COST -SIDEWALK
25,000
0
1-000-00-4276 SHARED COST -TREE RLPLt
5.)-000
10,415
18.406
64
6.544-26-
O
1-000-00-4297 EIRE TRAINING PROGRAM
10 000
20,830
17.828
8'Qs
32.172-
1-000-00-4299 GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT
*
4-165
6.820
!.ISO
3s1n0-
32-272-
64-
TOTAL OTHER ReVENUf
3•I60-
32-
246:950
269,530
420,284
71,26S
O
TDTAL GEVERAL FUNS
226,266-
226,666-
35-
5,889.700 6,620.625 7.684.905
---'----------------- -_____�-w__-,,.�_
2.056,94E
89204.800-
8.204.795-
139 -
MOTOR FUEL TAR FUND
INTERGOV.=;RNMENTAL REVENUE
22-000-00-4159 M E T ALLOCA€IjjN
ZZ -000-00-4241 RLIMBURSEMT
931.200
3dd,165
386.310
82.458
ON PROJECTS
Z1-D00-QD=4245 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FU-4o12•SUO
30 .00U
3.830
8.026
545.290-
545,290-
59-
22-000-00-4248 ItiTEREST INCOME
26,170-
T3€AL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
28x400
11.830
31.082
6.202
0
990.000
412.495
4Z1.2ZZ
9606862.682
2.662
9
566.778-
568.778-
S7-
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE
24-OJQ-UO-4055 TAXES - CURRENT 248.900 103,705
24 -QUO -01)-4056 TAXES - PRIOR 261.000 109.t65 263.411 6.241 Z48.900- 248,900- lUO-
24-000-00-§154 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 45,000 18.750 t•411 1.411 1
24-000-00-4248 IYTERt_ST INCOME 600250 #S,U00- 45.000- lit0-
T3TAL TAX RLVE'+UE 1.481 1.068 881 881 I47
556.500 23tr8T0 264.892 7.329 291,608-
29I.600-
TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 556,500 231.870 264.892
-------------'-'--- ------.- --_ Tr329 29t.608- 29C.608- '52-
LI5RART FUNU
TAX 2EVENU�
39-000-00-4031 TAXES - LIBRARY SERVICESI#463.980
609#990
YILLA�,E OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
39-000-00-4037 TAXES - IMRF
Id5.000
77,080
1,463.9x0-
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
39-00U-00-4038 TAXES - MAtNT G REPAIR
PAGE
3
185.OU0-
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD 05 ENDING
9130!89
19.120
Iz.IjO
t27*300-
TOTAL MOTOR 'UEL TAX FUND
---------------------------------------�-
t99d-d9
BUDGET
990.000
Y -T -U
ESTIMATE
412. §�f5
T -T -O
ACTUAL
421,222
LUR AO
ACTUAL
96.686
UNREC•U
fiALAWL r_
568,778-
BALANCE
568.778-
=
BAL
57 -
COMMUNITY OEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
1.005.400-
l00-
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
i NTERGOVFRNMENTAL P.EVENUE
39-UUO-00-4157 STATE GRANT
52.260
21,780
23 ODO-00-4155 C[}^„ GRANT
23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME
"TAT INTERGOVERNMENTAL RFVENUE
TOTAL COMMUNITY-DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
-------------------s-
51'i,950
5� •000
:450
52�r950
214,975
4,165
214sL40
Z19,140
134,000
8,418
142,418
142,418
64.000
12
64.0121,562-
64.012
381.950-
1.582-
383.532-
383,532-
381,950-
383.5 t2-
303,532-
74-
tb-
T3-
73-
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
TAX REVENUE
24-OJQ-UO-4055 TAXES - CURRENT 248.900 103,705
24 -QUO -01)-4056 TAXES - PRIOR 261.000 109.t65 263.411 6.241 Z48.900- 248,900- lUO-
24-000-00-§154 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 45,000 18.750 t•411 1.411 1
24-000-00-4248 IYTERt_ST INCOME 600250 #S,U00- 45.000- lit0-
T3TAL TAX RLVE'+UE 1.481 1.068 881 881 I47
556.500 23tr8T0 264.892 7.329 291,608-
29I.600-
TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 556,500 231.870 264.892
-------------'-'--- ------.- --_ Tr329 29t.608- 29C.608- '52-
LI5RART FUNU
TAX 2EVENU�
39-000-00-4031 TAXES - LIBRARY SERVICESI#463.980
609#990
39-000-00-4037 TAXES - IMRF
Id5.000
77,080
1,463.9x0-
1.463,980-
100-
39-00U-00-4038 TAXES - MAtNT G REPAIR
`127,300
53.040
185.OU0-
185.000-
100-
39 -000 -OU -4034 !AXES -INSURANCE 6 AUDIT
19.120
Iz.IjO
t27*300-
127.300-
100 -
MAL TAX REVENUt-
1,805,400
752,240
29Tt2O-
29.120-
too-
1.005.400-
l00-
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
39-UUO-00-4157 STATE GRANT
52.260
21,780
39-00U-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX
29,300
12.205
52.280-
'32.280-
I00-
1iIAL INTrkraVEPNMENTAL REVENUE
8t,580
33,985
Z4.3U0-
29,300-
too -
8t•580-
81.580-
100-
PARKING REVENUE
39-OCO-00-4216 FINES AND FORFEITS
41�v000
1b,665
39 -000 -UO -4248 INTFREST INCOME
43,000
16.665
40,000-'
40r000-
t00-
39-000-00-4254 3TNER INCOME
252,420
105.175
40.000-
40.000-
100-
T07AL PARKING REVENUE
331,420
133, SUS
252.420-
252,420-
t00-
332.410-
332.420-
too -
TOTAL LIBRARY FUaD
2.219.400
924,730
- ------------------ --------- —._.,..-
29214.400-
2.21°.400-
l00 -
MATER L SEWER FUND
TAX REVENUE
41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
41-ODO-OO-4020 TAKES - PRIOR
4t-OI'0-00-4114 SERER INSPECTION FEES
TDTAt TAA REVENUE
INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
47-000-00-4151 GRANT - P M SEWER
41-000-00-4201 MATER SALES
41-000-00-4ZOZ SEWER FEES
41 -ODD -00-4203 WATER PENALTIES
41-000-00-4204 METER RENTAL
4l-ODO-00-4205 WATER E SEWER TAPS
4I-ODO-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER
41-ODO-00-4245 JAWA RETWOURSEMENTS
41-000-00-4146 JAWA INCOME
41-000-00-4241 JAMA INTEREST
41-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
41-000-00-4249 1ISLELI.AMEOOS
41-000-00-4280 SALE OF PROPERTY
41-000-00-4289 GAIN/LASS SALE OF ASSETS
41-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVEST.
4"(10-00-4"S DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION
41-000-00-4299 NATER CLEARING ACCOUNT
TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE
TOTAL WATER E SEWER FUND
PARKING: SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENGE REPORT
ACCDONTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30189
1988-89 V -T -O T -T -D CDR MD
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
732.100 305.040
873.600 364.000 893.030 .9.025
25.000 10.415 15,660 L.601
1.630.700 679.455 908.690 20.bZ6
STZ.100 238.375
3.64-9.0100 1.SZ01000 11116.394 351.158
352.000 146.665 162.034 339447
50.000 20.630 32.756 9.182
ZO.000 8.330 TV156 5.592-
65.000 27.080 886611 5.975
Zi, 000 10.4!5 13.341 3.801
ZD.000 8.330 680
45.232
704.600 85.250 118,6S6 29.100
200000 8.330 24.407 6.164
55.000 ZZ9915
5.03'9700 29096.520 Z,209.327 433.835
696629400 Z•175.97S 3.1[89017 454.467
FEE AEVENUE
1.440
740
46-000-00-4113
t€MTAL - DEPOT
2.880
TOTAL FEE REVENUE
1.440
240
1.440-
29880
PARKING REVENUE
46-030-00-4Z1I
METER COLLECTION UNIT 01
82.000
46-000-00-4112
M€TER COt1ECT ION -UNIT VZ
66,ODO
46-000-00-4213
SPACE RtNT Wttt€ ST.CDT
4.600
46-050-00-424 #
PARKING STUD? XEt+l8
15.000
46-0210-00-4248
INTEREST INCOME
47.969-
TOTAL PARKING REVFNUE
14.520
3.It0
260
187.120
TOTAL PARKING -STSTE M-KETE NUE-FOND------j- 190.000
UNRE C` O
BALANCE
732,100-
19.430
9.340-
TZ2.01 D -
.STZ.100-
1,931.606-
189,966-
17.244-
12.844-
Z3.671
I1,659 -
T9, 320-
45.232
85. 944-
4.404
55,^DO-
Z.8Z2.373-
3.544.383-
PAGE 4
t
BALANCE BAL
732.100- 100-
19.430 2
9s340- S7-
7Z2.0L0- 44-
572.I00- 100-
1.931.606- 53-
tB9.966- S4-
IT.Z44- 34-
12.844- 64-
23.671 36
11.659- 47-
19.320- 41-
0
45.232 O
85.!44- 42-
4.407 ZZ
55.000- 100-
0
0
O
0
Z.BZZ.373- 56-
3.5+14.383- 53-
1.200
1.440
740
1.100
1.440
240
1.440-
1,%40-
so-
O -50-34.165
so -
34,165
34.03t
6.387
57.969-
271500
26.726
5,363
39.274-
47.969-
58-
4.000
3.It0
260
6.490-
39.174-
60-
6.150
6.490-
68-
6.050
8.574
19564
15'
150000-
too -
77,965
7Z."l
I30574
5.946-
'114.679-
-,
5.946I
40100-
-
114.679-
5L-
79.165
73.861
13.814
IIS.I19-
II6.119-
61 -
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
49-000-00-4176 GENERAL FUND CHARGES L.07T.230 4480845 430,916 lOT.719
49-000-00-4111 WATER FUND CHARGES LT2.600 71,915 69.040
49-000-00-4178 PARKING FUND CHARGES 30300 iT.0
1,375 1.320 3 3330
6469314- 6460314- b0-
103.560- 103.560- 60-
1.980- 1.980- 60-
VILLAGE OF MOONT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTING
PERIOD 05 ENDING
9/30,189
,1488-84
Y -T, -D
T -T -D
COR MO
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
0RREC'0
=
BALANCE
BALANCE
DAL
SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE
49-0)0-00-4Z41 E4PLOTEE CCIW RIBUTIUMS
69,000
44-000-0G-4142 RETIREE CQRTRIBUTIONS
82.000
26.333
5.3;5
42,667-
49-000-00-4241 LIBRARY CONTRIBUTIONS
69,008
38,150
Se 265
40.664
4.386
41.531-
42.667-
62-
49-030-00-4244 FLEKCOMP CDNFRIBUTIUNS
6
ZB*750
31.4I1
33.599-
41.331-
50-
49-000-00-4245 RFiMBURSEMFNTS
.320
2.630
2.903
468
37.589-
54-
44-000-00-4248 IVVESTMENT INCOME
25.000
6'445
2.00;
3s41T-
3.41?-
54-
49-000-QO-4244 INTEREST - GTE
B5*500
36.250
36,150
39,237
8.248
I8, 055-
18x055-
72-
T)FAL SERVICE CHARG= REVENUE
5,500
Z, 290
i7sT23-
41.723-
55-
1.596.950
665.385
648.814
[50.770
5.500-
59500-
/00-
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
948.136-
948.136-
59 -
1:596.950
665.365
64:,.8€4
-
150,770
448. i36-
9;8•,136-
59 -
CAPITAL IMPRV. C REPL. FUND
TAR REVENUE
51-000-00-4016 FAKES - CURRENT
234.400
51-000-00-4OI7 TAKES - PRIUR
749750
tOiMil TAR REVENUE
23,1•900
47e455
135.188
S,5 T3
tT9'400
179.400-
100-
41;.300
172.205
235.188
5.573
(x288
!*40
I
I[iTElFURD TRANSFERS
178't12-
178.112-
1#3-
51-000-00-4226 FLANS - GENERAL FUND
51-000e 00-4248
1501000
t04*t65
INTEREST INCOME
51-0%0-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EOUIPMENT
30.000
12'500
Z4,IOT
4.T93
Z5[):GU0-
250.000-
!00-
51-D00-00-4263 SALL OF P.N. Li1UIPMENF
2.500
1,040
5,843-
5*893-
20-
15.000
"-000-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT 40, ODD
6.250
2,500-
15,000-
2.500-
t00-
St -000-08-4261 DEVELOPER DONATION
16.665
15.000 -
100-
51-0D0 00-4168 iitSTORICAL SOCIETY DONT"
77.652
40.000-
40.000-
!00-
T]TAL INTERF UND FR A`4 SF Ei1S
30,004
IZ,40w500
;33
[b:344-
16.348-
IT -
463#500
t43e120
111.142
4,793
22,561-
22,567-
75-
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRV, C REPL. FUND
352.308 -
352,308-
76-
876,800
365,315
346.380
10.36b
530,420-
530v*.ZO- 530.420-
6Q -
CORPORATE PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV
OTHER REVENUE
-
53-ODO-00-4242 SALE OF BUNDS -SERIES A
1,000,000
53-000-00-4243 SALE OF BONDS -SERIES 8
53-000-00OTHER
500,000
416,665
208:330
1.000.000- -
1,000.000-
100-
INTEREST INC OM£
TOIAL OTHER REVENUE
40.000
16.665
500.000-
500,000-
t00-
►.54's000
64tsbb0
40.000 -
40.000-
100_
TOTAL PURPOSES 1484
1,540.000-
1,546.000-
100-
-CORPORATE -
1,540.000
641.660
--.-_______---�__M_
19540.000-
t.540.000-
100-
DDMgFOMN REDEVL►MT CONST 198T
OTHER REVENUE
S4-OOD-00-4218 INTEREST INCOME
79500
3.125
4,238
3:262-
3.262-
43-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
PAGE 6
ACCOONT[NG PER[00 05 ENDING
9/30199
1968-89
7 -T -D
Y -T -O
CUR MO
T]TAt OTHER REVENUE
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
[1NREC-U
%
7.500
3.125
4. 238
BALANCE
BALANCE
BAL
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDE VLPMT CONST 1987
3.262-_
7.262_
;3
--_------------ -----------------
:SJO
1.125
41238
3.262-
3.Ib 2-
43-
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1965
FEE REVENUE
S5-003-00-4113 114TAL INCOME
55-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS
99000
3.150
S.S47
750
3.453-
55-000-00-4248 It7TERLST INCOME3.453-
20
38-
TOTAL FEE REVENUE
.000
29.000
89 330
15.144
Z•439
4.956-
0
12.080
20.691
3.169
4.856-
24-
TOTAL DOWNTOWN RFUETLPMT CONST 1985
29.000
8.309-
8.309-
29-
_---___-_---____ '----'-------
i2.080
IO.691
1.189
9.309-
8.309-
29-
CORPORATE PURPOS=S 8 E 11973
TAX REVENUE
60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
72.600
30.250
60-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR
60-000-00-5164 PERSONAL PROP RIPE
69.200
28.830
69.581
1.649
iZe381
72.600-
(00-
TAX
60-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME10.000
5.400
2.250
381
5.400-
181
1
T]TAt fAX RUVE
4.165
5.433
1.338
4.567-
5.400-
100-
157.200
b5.495
75.014
2.98T
4.567-
46-
TOTAL EURP07tAT£B E I Lg73
82,186-
B 2.186-
52-
-PURPOSES
L5T.200
65.495
75,014
2.987
82.196-
82.186-
52 -
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E I 1974
TAX REVENUE
61-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT
61-030-00-4023
97*300
40.540
TAXES - PRIOR
61-000-00-4tby PERSONAL PROP RE Pt
126 800
r
52x630
127.568
3.023
97.300-
768
979300-
100-
FAX
6l-000-00-4248 14TEREST INCOME
1.200
20.000
3,000
7*200-
768
I
TOTAL TAX REVEvi7£
251,300
8.350
ID.Z59
2.504
9.741-
7.100-
too -
104.700
137.827
5.527
9.741-
49-
TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 9 E I t974
1139473-
!13.473-
45 -
----- ---------------
25[.300
104.700
137.827
5.521
�-
133.473-
113.473-
45-
SSA 01 PROSPECT MEADOWS A E I
TAX REVENUE
62-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT
Lt.300
62-000-00-4026 TAXES - PRIOR
11rt50
4,705
11.300-
62 -000-00-424 8 INTEREST INCOME
4,645
!0,780
341
370-
11.300-
LOO -
TOTAL TAX R£YEFiUE
2.750
1.145
I,550
33S
370-
3-
25.200
10.495
12.330
676
t.200-
2U O-
♦y-
TOTAL SSA :I PROSPECT MEADOWS B E I
129870-t.
t2.87o-
51-
ZS•ZOO
10.495
12. 330
676
12.870-
12.870-
51-
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED
kEVENUE REPORT
PAGE
7
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING
9/30/89
1488-89
v- 1-1)
Y -T -O
CUR MO
--------- ----------�.-----�--- ---_
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
UMREC•O
;
BALANCE
BALANCE
HAL
SSA 02 BLACKHAWK h L 1
TAX REVENUE
63-UDO-UO-4028 TAXES - CORRENT
63-OOU-00-4024 TAXES - PRIOR
U .200
6.330
63-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
/d.600
7.750
18.06;
1sL4Z
t5*200
IS.IOo-
;00-
T3TA1 FAX KEVENUf
2.700
1.;25
1.515
36}
539-
539-
3-
36 500
1
15.205
14.576
1.605
1:185-
1,185-
44 -
TOTAL SSA DZ BLA.Rt1AWK 9 L ;16.924-
16.424-
46-
---------- -_..-,,,__e-__-- ------- ._.-__-"�_
3b. SUO
15.205
19,516
1 *605
'-
16.924 -46
-
CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 L I t484A
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
64-OOD-OU-4128 TRANS - 1989A 114PRY
35.000
TJIAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
t4.580
35eU0U
14.580
35.000-
35.0G0_
L00--
TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES d L S I484A
35.00tt-
35.000-
1BU-
35.000
14.580
35.000-
JSWOOO-
too -
CORPORATE PURPOSES b L 119848
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
65-000-OG-4ZZ7 TkANS - GENERAL F,j%o
L5.000
6.250
MAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
IS.DUO
6.250
15.000-
15.000-
LS.U40-
too -
00-TOTALCORPORATE
TOTAL CORPORATEPURPOSES B L ; I9�48
15.000-
too_
-----'----�---
15.000
6 •250
-
IS.00O-
15.000-
t00 -
INSURANCE RESERVE B L I
TAX REVENUE
66-070-QO-40/9 TAXES CUKKt NI
66-000-0J-4020 TAXES - PRIOR
44.900
18.705
INTEREST INCOME
56.400
24.665
58.799
1.343
44.900-
44.900-
too -
TOTAL
TOTAL TAX REVENUE
6.400
2.665
4x026
413
299
294
t
109.800
45.745
6[.825
2.306
2.374-
2.374-
37-
TOTAL INSURANCE RESERVE B L [
6 .975-
446.475-
46.975-
43_
----�-----------
tOy.SOU
45.745
62.!!25
2.306
46.975-
43 -
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B L I 14870
-
TAX REVENUE
68-00U-00-4054 i`ACPERTY FAX INCREMENT
6d-000-00-4039
37.500
15.625
34.383
SALES TAX INCREMENT
5*271
L.Bs3
T3TAL FAX REVENUE
;.s83
;.s83
5
t5.6Z5
39.383
5.Z71
0
1.885
1.883
5
P W FACILITY B t 1 19878
TAX REVENUE
69-03U-00-4019 TARES -CURRENT'
141,700
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
69-000-UU-4020 TAXES -PRIOR
IOfAL TAX REVENUE
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
243.934
PAGE
8
142,700-
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 EMDING
9!30/89
385,300
160,535
243.934
S•180
1988-89
Y -T -O
Y -T -O
CUR MO
DOWNTOWN RE DEYLPMi B E I L487D
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
A
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
0
i4*060
i
69-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
BALANCE
BALANCE
SAL
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
69-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME
2.080
10.247
68-00U-00-4224 TRANS - 0/7 CONST 19810
76,750
O
[DIAL INTERFUND TRA14SFERS
68-000-00-42# 8 INTEREST INCOME
31.975
57,000
98.7"0
•
ht,140
103.997
68-()00-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME
250
100
384
258
!9.750-
19+750-
26-
TJtAL 1NIERFUND TRANSFERS134
59247
S
__..._______--_______._—_____
t3#
201.675
54
4 044
T7.000
32.075
57.384
258
O
TOTAL DOWNTOWN R50 8
EVLPX( E t t9d7p
4
11.500
136s1t9-
28-
DOWNfUWN kEOEVLPMT 8 E i 1967C
19,61b-
19,616-
25-
4 7.700
96.767
Ss5Z9
70-00U-00-4224 TRANS - O/T CONST 19870
29*500
17.7 } 3-
15-
P W FACILITY B t 1 19878
TAX REVENUE
69-03U-00-4019 TARES -CURRENT'
141,700
59,455
69-000-UU-4020 TAXES -PRIOR
IOfAL TAX REVENUE
242,600
!01. Od0
243.934
5,780
142.700-
142,700-
LDD-
385,300
160,535
243.934
S•180
1,334
1.334
1
INfEXFUNO TRANSFERS
141+366-
t41*366-
37-
69-0DU-OJ-4227 TRANS - CIRR FUND
93,T50
i4*060
69-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
5:000
93e750
69-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME
2.080
10.247
3.264
5,247
O
[DIAL INTERFUND TRA14SFERS
5,247
145
98.7"0
•
ht,140
103.997
3.264
0
TOTAL P W FACILITY 6 E 15,247
/9878
59247
S
__..._______--_______._—_____
484.050
201.675
347,931
4 044
136+119-
136s1t9-
28-
DOWNfUWN kEOEVLPMT 8 E i 1967C
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
70-00U-00-4224 TRANS - O/T CONST 19870
29*500
70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
129240
14.323
70-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME
50
20
159174-
15.177-
51_
F31AL INTERFUND fRANSFERSSO-
50-
LOO -
29.550
l2*310
L4.323
O
8 6 t 19870
15.228-
15.227-
52-
2-
----TOTAL-DOUNTOWN-------T
-------------
-_---->-�____-_
29.550
12,310
14s323
__"'�-'_-------
15,228-
15.227-
52-
PNCE PENSION FUND
TAX REVENUE
71-UDO-00-4049 TAXES - CURRENT
100.000
71 -040 -OJ -4 050 TAXES - PRIOR
41e 665
7l-OJU-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP-REPL TAX
1 .000
29.399
697
100.000-
104*000-
loo-
7l-OOU-OD-42;3 PO[ICEMENS CONTR1BUiiONS
I1 •QUO
5804[5
4,580
28+399
28,399
840213.000
7t -OBJ -OJ -4248 INTERtST INCOME
88,750
91.134
Lf.06f
I1,000-
11.00o-
!00-
71-000-00-4249 JfHER
1.200+000
500.400
SIS.BLB
104,975
121.866-
/21+866-
57-
71-000-00-4290 GRIM ON SALE OF INVESIMT
1
684s1d2-
684,182-
57-
FJIAL TAX REVENUE8'
0
t
1
0
1, 525 s000
x35,410
645¢102
122.139
8,750
8+750
0
879,898-
819.89d-
58-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED
REVENUE REPORT
PAGE
9
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING
9/3Ul89
TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND
_-------------------------..-_-®_
1988-89
BUDGET
t.5Z5:000
_
Y -T -O
ESTIMATE
635.410
Y -T -D
ACTU�
645.10 -
CUR NO
ACTUAL
122:734
UNREC•D
BALANCE
819.898-
BALANCE
879.898-
%
8AL
58-
FIREMEW S PENSION FUND
-
TAX REVENUE
TZ -ODD -00-4052 TAXES - CURRENT 50.000
TZ -030-00-4053 TAXES -PRIOR
TZ -000-00-4243 EIREMEN•S CONTRIBUTIONS ZOT.000
72-000-00-4248 T'iTEREST INCOME te400.Q00
72-000-00-4249 OTHER
12-000-U"J-4Z90 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESINT
TJTAL TAX RFVEHUE t.65T.00O
TOTAL-FIREMEN•S- PENSION -FUND
-_^-� 1.651.000
- 4
10.830
86.250
SQ 3. 334
690.410
690.410
889016
594:175
t�,tl3
695.304
695.304
16.2950
tl9.549
845
136.669
136.689
50.000-
tI8.984-
805.8ZS-
!3.113
961.696-
961.646-
50.000-
118.984-
805.825-
13.tI3
961*696-
961.696-
t00 -
57-
58-
0
0
58-
58 -
SSA 63 BUSSE-WILLE 0 E I
TAX REVENUE
88-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
88-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR
68-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
T7TAL TAX REVENUE
375
t2s
SOO
155
50
205
370
151
521
Z9
29
5-
26
2!
5-
Z6
21
0
1-
Zl
4
TOTAL -SSA ®33-BUSS'_NTLLT-8 L 1---_-�$
500
-
205
SZI
29
2t
21
4
SSA 94 BUSSE-WILLE 0 E I
TAX REVENUE
89-O30-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
69-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR
84-09D-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
TJTAL TAX REVENUE
4Q0
165
165
7
464
471
93 93
7
64
T1
T
64
TI
0
O
16
16
SSAA4BUSSE-Wt LLEBE1
TOTAL-------------------------------- �-- .
- - - - - -- -
400
165
4T1
43
TI
71
18
SSA 86 GEORGE/ALBERT B E !
TAX REVENUE
94-000-09-4019 TAXES - CURRENT
94-000-00-40ZO TAXES -PRIOR
94-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME
44 -000 -OD -4149 OTHER INCOME
1.400
31.950
100
6.415
13.310
40
3Z.Iil
58Z
925-
Z.3T0
243
15.400-
151
482
L5.400-
161
48Z
100-
1
482
TJTAL TAX REVEWL
47.450
!9.765
32.6930
1.b88
14.757-
24.757-
31 -
TOTAL SSA 06 GEORGE/ALBERT 0 E I
47.450
19.765
32.693
1.686
14.15Y-
14.757-
31-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING'PERIUO
RAGE
10
05 ENDING 9130/89
1988-89 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL
ONREC•0
ACTUAL
BALANCE
x
BALANCE
dAL
FLOOD LOAN B E I
IMTERFUND TRANSFERS
95-030-00-4227 TAANSFFR GENERAL FUND
TJTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS
43.725 18.Zt5 149575
43.725 k8•Z15 I b 575
29.150-
29.150-
TOFA_ FLOOD LOAN B E I
29.150-
67-
---------------------------
43.725 Iu.215 14.575
29s150-
67-
29.150-
Z9.150-
67 -
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
2S.61S.315 14.880.717
i4.839s900 2.1{b.{@1
@1-
20x735.66{-
20.735.65@-
VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
PAGE
11
ACCOUNTING PERIOD OS ENDING
9130/89
PUBLIC RFPRESENTATION
1488-89
BUDGET
T -T -O
ESTIMATE
Y -T -D
ACTUAL
COR MO
ACTUAL
UNEXPENJE0
UNENCUM
X
DIVISION
DaIANCE
EYCUMBENEO BAL�INCE
BAL
MAYOR AND 30ARO OF TRUSTEES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
17,500
7:290
f,500
TOTAL CON TRA:TUAi SERVICES
32.750
13.635
'
20.343
t*501
10.001
10*000
57
TOTAL COMMODITIFS
3.650
1.520
3.190
1,35'0
12.407
12.407
38
TOTAL MAYU�i ANO BOARD OF TRUSTEES
55.400
22:445
lt•63 3
184
3.0 44
t40
140-
4-
ADVISORY BOAROS AND COMMISSIONS
22.268
22.267
41
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
4x175
1.730
ISO
TOTAL CUMMJDITIES
ISO
60
108
42
4.025
4.025
46
TOTAL ADVISORY 90 AR US AND COMMISSI
4.325
Is740
258
42
42
28
TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATIUN DIVISION
5.1.225
42
4.067
4.067
44
--------_--____-_
24.235
31.841
3.086
26.335
26.334
45
VILLAGE MANAGER -S OFFICE
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TGTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVTCES
14t,660
59.015
62.487
11.578
79,173
TOTAL COMMODITIES
15.190
6.320
5.535
1.156
4.655
74.173
56
TOTAL CAPITAt FXPENDITUkES
1i250
1:073
125
177
9.655
64
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
1.000
159.100
4 415
15
66.270
64.045
11000
ITT
1.000
t4
tU0
(2i85q
40.005
90.005
5T
LEGAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES
1451000
58.330
46.741
8,224
9J.2t0
[40.000
5tl.330
46.741
8.224
43*210
43*209
b7
PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT L TRAINING
93r2G4
6T
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
41.250
17.130
2.819
TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
271750
111535
141310
SI4
1.899
33'471
38.431
43
Tt1TAl PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT L ►RAIN
300
69.300
125
413
99
13.412
113
[3.410
113-
48
20:840
17.572
2.438
51.730
38-
SALARY ADMINISTRATION
51.728
75
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
IS0, 000
1U4rt65
TOTAL SALARY ADMINISTRATION
25,,000
104.165
250.000
250.000
100
TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
250,000
250.000
!OO
-____-_--
618.400
257*605
133.458
23*526
484:445
484.442
T8
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
CABLE IV UPERATIONS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6x3.100
28.365
26.030
3,983
4Z*O70
TUTAL COMMODITIES
24.260
10.090
12,153
803
Lt, 107
42*0TO
62
TUTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
lI.T20
4.880
4*781
852
6+974
12.909
6.934
50
TOTAL CABLE TV JPERATIONS
[11x810
1.810
3.220
46.555
1.518
6*312
6.212
59
441482
7*156
7.156
671328
671328
60
60
TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS
!1118[0
46,555
44.482
___________
--_--_._----_-_-_-_---_---_Q---------------
7.156
67.328
671328
60
FINANCE
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
66,700
28*6t5
28,Ly7
41111
40.407
400*03
59
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ADMINiSTRATIUN AND SUPPURT
TOTAL CONTRA--TUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
TOTAL CAPITALEXPENDITURES
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
ACCOUNTING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
IOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
TOTAL ACCOUNTING
PURCHASING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
TOTAL PURCHASING
ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING
DUPLICATING SERVICES
TOTAL CUMTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
TOTAL OUPLICATING SERVICES
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE
INSURANCE
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CDNTRACIUAL SERVICES
TOTAL INSURANCE
CUSTOMER SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMDUItIES
TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICES
CASH MANAGEMENT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CASH MANAGEMENT
NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENOtNG 9130189
1986-89 T -T -D T -T -D CUR NO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
63.420 26.405 21.676 5.813
5,250 2.180 3.055 I.ST5
3,000 1.250
I4U.370 58.450 53.028 16.499
82.575 34.400 39,i72 7.888
3,400 tr410 656 299
500 205 i24
86.475 36.015 39.952 8.187
21.500 8.955 10.220 1.498
500 205
1.700 705 101
239100 9.865 tO.321 1x498
88.000 36.655 24.191 4.214
7,000 2.915 129855 330
5.000 2.080 1x168 838
39,300 16,375 39,300
134,300 580DZ5 77,514 5.382
22,000 99165 !0,528 3.336
7.500 3,125 2,836 243
29,500 12.290 13,364 3.581
18,900 7.8TS 6.341 736
44,500 18,540 Zi,124 49055
L,SOO 1,040
65.900 279455 29.465 4,791
26,700 !1.120 t2,093 2.199
424,200 1T6,750 169.680 420420
450,900 187.870 I81,713 44,619
80.400 33.495 37.647 6.764
Z9.000 12.080 3.907 251
7.150 2,970 815 102
110.550 48,545 42.369 7.117
229825 9,505 tO.658
1#94a
Z2,82S 9,505 10.658 1,948
2,500 10040 154 154
PAGE 12
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM %
BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE PAL
41,T44
41.744
66
2.195
2x195
42
3,000
3,000
100
87.342
87.342
62
43,403
43.403
53
21744
3
2,Tit
at
376
376
75
46.523
3
46.520
S4
T h280
11.280
52
500
500
100
1.599
1,599
94
13.379
13,379
56
63,809
-
63,809
T3
51855-
55
5,910-
84-
3,832
30832
77
61,1860
55
61,731
44
11,472
11,172
52
4,664
19
4.645
6Z
16,136
19
16.117
55
10,559
10,559
56
23.376
23.376
53
2,500
2,500
t00
36.435
36,435
55
14,607
t4.601
55
254.520
254,520
60
269,127
264,127
60
42.754
42,75!
53
25,093
5
25,088
67
6.335
6,335
89
74rt82
5
749176
64
129161
12.167
53
1Z.161
12,167
53
2,347
2.346
94
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30!89
1988-89 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO
FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
NON-OEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURCS
82 648.490
56
31.040
fOTAI DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 43 7Z5
TOTAL NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE
18.215
14.575
22.4+49
46�
•125
149255
!4.729
TOTAL sFIVANCE OEPARTMENTq------_-----1.121.745
53,600
467.275
473.173
VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE
352 934.241
60
934.599
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
60
138,065
TOTAL PERSONAL SFRVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES24.110
55.150
22.970
17.396-
TOTAL COMMODITIES
31.520
13e120
4.071
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
40*500
.455
.389
b9
.ITQ
377.545
366.570
VILLAGE NEWSLETTER
369*253
441
368.761
TOTAL COMFRA_7UAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
410250
1T.L85
16.502
TOTAL VILLAGE NEWSLETTER
3*750
450000
1.560
86,333
59
79111
18.745
16.502
TOTALVILLAGECLERKS OFFICE
--------------------------------------
135*170
56.190
S3:072
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT
1.551.500
b46.445
616,90t
PROGRAM
(*551*500
61b.445
616:401
TOTAL RISK MAMAG�MENT--'-------
1.551,500
646.445
616.90L
INSPECTION SERVICES
INSPECTION SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRA-TUAL SERVICES
313*805
132.820
142*347
TOTAL COMMODITIES
69.530
28,950
21.314
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
4*250
3.835
1*355
TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES
59500
403.485
2*285
1,009
167*840
166.230
ENGINEERING SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
IOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
253*250
103 495
,
114*385
TOTAL COMMODITIES
44.650
1@e56S
61#566
TOTALCAPITAL EXPENDITURES
6.500
2.105
1.237
TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES
317.500
19900
3*(20
2.314
124.905
179.541
TOTAL INSPECTION -SERVICES
---------`-r-
T14,985
297.795
345.732
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATIJN AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
fQTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
421st65
177.450
(84*641
TOTAL COMMOOIfIES
(46.000
60.815
59:667
10.000
4,165
2*889
i54
93.7 76
5.093
1.209
Lit
6,413
6,473
90,422
90,422
90.422
ZOV417
4.574
3
32,994
219258
14.940
200
36*508
69.502
42*319
4,746
209
PAGE 13
UNEXPENOEO UMENCUM %
BALANCE ENCUMB�RtD BALANCE BAL
29.150 29.150 67
31.497 31.496 68
648.574
82 648.490
56
31.040
31.040
56
22,449
22.4+49
71
111
II1
3
53,600
53.600
59
24.748
24.748
60
3,750
3.750
t00
28.498
28.498
63
82.098
82,098
61
934.599
352 934s241
60
934,599
352 934.241
60
934.599
352 934s24T
60
IT6,450
176,458
55
48,011
t1
48*000
69
79895
7.895
85
4*49t
4.491
81
236.855
I1
236.844
59
133.865
138,065
55
16.9L6-
480
17.396-
39-
5#263
5,263
8t
5*186
5,186
b9
132,398
400
131.918
42
369*253
441
368.761
51
142,474
242.474
57
86#334
86,333
59
79111
7.111
71
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BOOGEY EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/89
1998-89 Y -TIO V -T -O COR MO
POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
4.605
4♦60S
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
5♦000
340.52%
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
589♦155
2.080
235♦010
345
2;7.642
PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT
l♦319.283
56
TOTAL PERSUNAL SCRYIEES
TOTAL CONTRALTUAC
2.335.290
973♦425
1.038.007
SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
Z43♦520
101.460
tab. 251
300
TOTAL PATROL AND TRAFFIC EWORCEME2.608♦110
L1.785
1.441,9L7
1
1.441.915
1.086♦670
t.166.194
CRIME PREY., PUBLIC AND YOUTH SERV.
72.180
71
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL
tOl.540
42.295
24.360
SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
34.820
6.165
2#769
TOTAL CRIME PR�V., pUBtit AND YOU[
3'350
119.710
1'390
1#9#850
581
1
86♦999
73
32.710
INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PROGRAM
253,958
60
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES171.822
425#790
377.380
22.975
TOTAL COMMODITIES
37.620
15.670
14.645
TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE AND J17VENILE
P 461,40
830
499
♦ l0
143.880
186,966
CROSSING GUARDS
39.813
TT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL
521000
21.665
12#[27
COMMODITIES
TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS
500
52♦500
205
40♦313
17
21.870
[2.127
E1H/1PMENT MAINTENANCE L OPERATIONS
29.015
62
7.055
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRA%TUAL SERVICES
46.585
19♦405
17.570
TOTAL COMMOOITIES
60.4t0
339490
34.169
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
i1d.20O
49.245
53.6!0
25!.700
TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 6 ['PER 496 895
104.865
234.031
157.515
•
207#005
334.380
TOTAL FULICE DEPARTMENT
29345,773
94
2.345.677
-----------------------------------
4.3309790 1.804,2$5
19985,019
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEpT.
5$
Z .953
3.714
27,713
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
IT♦7Gi
60
4,668
TOTAL PERSONAL SFRVIEES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
258.755
107.785
108#938
TOTAL COMMODITIES
46,300
19.270
18,586
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
32,150
13.390
13.085
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
E5 9 TOO
352.905
6.535
7,185
L,557#215
L46.9$O
147s747
FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATLUNS
7
124,066
59
TOTAL PERSONAL SCRVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL
2.702.030 1.125,825 irIS4e 815
SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
210.890
87.$60
86.817
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
LZ•150
5.050
2.348
'
TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS
38,195 34,915
3,018,225 1,25T.530 1.268.895
PAGE 14
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM %
BALANCE ENCUMBERt0 BALANCE 8AL
52x274
4.605
4♦60S
92
340.52%
340.513
S8
t85.864
`4.906
1.3te.284
l♦319.283
56
YGT.266
107.266
44
208.384
16.367
1
16.366
58
1.441,9L7
1
1.441.915
55
5.049
1*003
72.180
72.180
71
356
12.051
12.051
81
6.408
2♦769
87.000
t
2.768
83
1
86♦999
73
31.851
3x413
253.468
253,958
60
97
12.9,5
22.975
6t
35.361
1, SU1
278.444
1♦501
75
278.444
60
3♦171
39.873
39.813
TT
3.1 T1
500
40.313
500
LOO
40♦313
17
3.323
1.007
29.015
29.015
62
7.055
46,241
1
46.240
58
9.400
64.590
7
64,583
55
23.785
17,669
84
17,585
7
157.515
92
151,413
32
329.383
29345,773
94
2.345.677
54
26.466
149,814
[44#817
5$
Z .953
3.714
27,713
11
IT♦7Gi
60
4,668
19.061#
96
18,968
59
37.$11
8,516
8♦515
54
205.tit
t01
ZU5.O01
56
205.102
1♦557.215
L,557#215
58
t9.4O1
124.OT3
7
124,066
59
489
20.790
9.602
1
99801
81
245.782
58♦240
65
58.175
62
1,749.330
73
1.749♦257
58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 913U/89
1988-89 Y -t -O T -T -O CUR MO
FIRE 6 EMERGENCY PROTECTION !DEPT. BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
-IRF PREVENTION
121.144
1.679
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
201.095
63 , 765
79 451
TOTAL COMMODITIES
32.865
13,675
11.160
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
49770
1.975
1.702
TUTAt FIRE PREVEYTION
4x650
1.935
3.616
16,116
Z430180
lut.350
46,429
CO4MU14ICATIONS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
60
Z918Z
19.420
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
3!.500
(3,925
t2, 080
TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS
x•0
3,440
100
40. 960
17,O65
li flA0
EQUIPMENT 14AIRTEIIANFE E OPERATIONS
49451
38,063
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
6t2
15.031
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
62.355
25.970
24 242
TOTAL COMMODITIES
23.585
9.825
8.554
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
44*000
18.330
Z0.288
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
58,760
24.480
14.481
b3,T50
TOTAL. EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPER 252.450
26.560
54,450
130,385
15
105s165
122.065
EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
1.80#6
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
1,192
2.461
TGIAL CONTRACTUAL. SERVICES
3,000
1.250
1,154
TOTAL COMMODITIES
39790
1.515
1,329
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
850
350
620
TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS
6.465
2,815
660
90
14,405
5,440
3,763
TOTAL -FIRE E E4EIGENCT PROTECTION -DEPT_
1,422.325
1.6349080 1,651.024
2.241.299
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
21271.06+4
58
POLICE E FIRE OISPATEII SERVICES
T0WAL CONTRACTUAL SLRVICES
TOTAL POLICE
3749160
155,400
156,925
E FIRE DISPATCH SERV I
374,!60
155,400
158s925
TOTAL CENTRAL OISPATEA SERVICE
3T4,160
-----------------
155,400
156:425
HUMAN SERVICES OIV1511JN
INFORMATION, RtFERRAL, E COUNSELING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL C04TRA:.TUAL SERVICES
78,884
32,850
33,389
TOTAL COMMODITIES
21.760
4.865
8.369
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPEMOITURES
3#400
1.4t0
3+285
TOTAL INFORMATION, REFERRAL, E COU
108,940
45,350
45.790
RECREATION AND EDUCATION
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
12,850
5.350
5,786
TOTAL RECREATION AND EDUCATION
1,650
685
1 4.500
6.035
7.309
7,045
HOMEBOUND SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
44,655
14.600
14.56;
PAGE 15
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM %
BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAt
13.155
121.144
1.679
151341
2#192
21,705
lLt,lh4
60
169
3#068
9,043
21,105
66
1,034
63#150 58
3.068
64
16,116
146,951
1,034
22
146,451
60
Z918Z
19.420
26
14.l9h
62
2,182
9,460
90460
100
29,880
26
280854
70
49451
38,063
6t2
15.031
38.063
61
2#798
Z3,TLZ
15#031
64
371
44,279
15
23.Tt2
54
8.232
9.300
44.264
99300
75
15
130,385
15
130.370
SZ
23t
1.80#6
1,192
2.461
1.846
62
}
2.46#
65
230
230
24
t#426
6*105
it
69094
90
10,642
it
10.631
74
311.549
2.241.299
Z32
21271.06+4
58
31.385 217,235
31,385 217,235 Z17,235 50
217,235 58
3t.385 21T.235
217.Z15 58
6.314
45.491
1.679
151341
45.491 58
100115
25.391 65
2, 153
115 3
9,043
63.150
2,153 44
63#150 58
959 7.064
7,064 55
959 T:4U5 341 Zt
7,405 St
2,418 25,041
25,041 56
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENS-- REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30fa9
1988-89 Y -T -D I -T -D CUR MO
BU DG T
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
E
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
HOMES OUND SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1.450
TOTAL 81-000 DONOR PROGRAM
4.255
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICFS
TOTAL HOMEBOUND SERVICES
15.150
6.310
6.035
1.165
19,000
59.805
24.910
25.599
49083
COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
120.800
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
30.425
12.670
13.784
1.710
TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES
1.300
31.725
S40
SIS
75
34.400
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1392t0
14.299
19785
81.000 DONOR PROGRAM
ONENE UM
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
2.805
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
BAL
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1.450
TOTAL 81-000 DONOR PROGRAM
4.255
SOCIAL AGENCIES
57
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
19.000
TOTAL SOCIAL AGENCIES
19,000
TOTAL HUMANSERVICESDIVISION�23,1.225
- ------------------
- --- -_---
60
PLANNING AMD LDNING DEPARTMENT
17.426
ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
120.800
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
22.900
TOTAL COMMODITIES
39800
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2,000
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANN'NG
149.500
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
34.400
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
15.000
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
40,000
TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
99,900
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
239400
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF
23.400
CDBG ADMINISTRATION
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
29.600
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1t.600
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1.150
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOTTURIS
19000
TOTAL COBG ADMINISTRATION
43.350
COBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
52,600
TOTAL CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS
52.600
1.165 1.168
600 340
19765 1.508
T9910 81625
7.910 8.625
999280 102.916
50, 315
9.530
1.575
830
62,250
14. 53 5
10,415
16,665
41.615
9.745
9.7-.5
12.325
4,820
415
415
18.035
2I,905
21,905
60v693
7-646
1.235
401
70.181
16.416
2.471
5,000
23.887
5.032
5.032
13,246
3,267
182
16,695
4.533
4. 533
314
e0-
68
302
1.750
19150
16.972
24:079
1..840
103
15.522
29644
10
5.000
7.654
19189
1.189
29133
491
2,624
19133
1.133
PAGE lb
UMEXPENOEO
ONENE UM
%
BALANCE ENCUM8-RFD
BALANCE
BAL
9.115
9.115
60
34.206
34,206
57
16.642
16.641
55
785
785
60
17.427
17.426
55
19637
1.110
1.147
10.375
10, 375
135. 3l0
60,107
15.055
2.565
19593
79.310
18.484
72.529
35,000
76, 01 3
18,368
18,368
16.354
6.333
I.I50
818
26. 655
48,067
48,067
1.637 58
0
1.110 7T
L.T47 65
10.375 55
10.315 55
I3S.309 57
60.207 50
(5.054 66
I 2.564 61
I,S93 Be
1 79,318 53
18.484 S3
22.529 90
359000 98
76.013 Y6
18.368 78
0
18.368 78
16,354 55
8.333 72
1,150 1 D
818 82
26,655 61
48.067 91
48.067 91
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTING
BUDGET EXPENSE
REPORT
PAGE
17
PERIOD
05 ENDING
9/30P89
1988-89
BUDGET
Y -r -D
T -T -O
CUR MO
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
UNEXPENDED
UNEMCUM
It
LOBG ACCESSIBILITY E NEIGHBORHOOD IM►RVM
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
9At,
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENUITURFS
1539500
TOTAL COBE ACCESSIBILIIT E NEIGHBO 153.500
63+955
1.427
1.315
152:013
COBG RESIDENTIAL RE MABlCITA7IUN
*
1.427
1.715
152.073
t52.0T3
1529073
44
49
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CAPITALFXPENOiTURES
5.000
2,500
19567
403
TOTAL CDdG RESIDENTIAL RfMAB[LtTAT
1'000
IG6
41.665
2{.984
I,
49433
75.016
49433
74
.000
44+165
269551
1 2Z+1190
90
15,016
75
CDBG COMMERCIAL REMA91tITATI0N
749444
(9+449
T5
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
89000
3e8 30
3$557
598
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
2.000
309000
830
585
4.443
1.415_
49443
56
TOTAL COBG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATI.
40:000
12+500
30.040
t.415
71
k69660
3{9182
548
40
40-
O
COBG MULTI -FAMILY RE4ABILITATION
5981d
5.818
IS
*
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
29500
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITTynS
TOTAL CDBG
5.040
244
29256
MULTI -FAMILY REHABILI(A
629500
26s040
244
609000
2.256
90
COUG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS
62,256
60.000
62.256
100
t00
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
19000
'
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
59000
415
185
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITURES
2 9080
q.}8q
845
845
85
TOTAL [DOG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS
6Z.000
Z5+830
51.712
640
4.389-
10:288
4.389-
88-
90Q0
289325
6..256
640
41
10.191
16
TOTAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
7489750
6.741
91
6965}
10
_-- '_-�--
332+695
Z43,980
43s165
554.763
92
SS 4. 670
64
STREET DIVISION
AURIMSSTRATION AND SUPPORT
i
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CON TR AC TUAC $ER VI CES
190,615
T 99400
81s 242
24.426
TOTAL COMMODITIES
93•Z60
38.845
34.870
8.644
104'393
104.323
S7
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
13.300
5.535
5s 548
841
58.390
9
58.381
63
TOTAL AOMIN[STRAT[UN AND SUPV,aRi
1.000
29B91TS
415
7.752
tiQ00
2
7.750
58
1249195
I21.T10
33.91T
1.000
100
MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS
t76146S
it
176.454
54
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL LUNlRACTUAL SERVICES
169.975
709815
t
81.446
tT.228
TOTAL COMMODITIES
69s400
24.[10
24.440
889130
88:!24
52
TOTALCAPiTgt EXPENDITURES
73.500
30s60S
47+018
519430
40.410
423
39.487
57
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
14.000
�
2.245
3.213
39022
26.482
20
26.462
36
TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILD[
334 700
2*370
i1:787
5*700
48
I1s689
78
9075
5399150
161.567
35.422
5.700
100
MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
172.504
541
171.967
SL
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
102.695
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL
269500
42'780
11:040
649308
4.546
339387
COMMODITIES
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPEMOITURE S
6'450
2.885
I2sI05
1.626149347
371
1S0
33.381
14.245
33
54
TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS
5.650
141.795
2+345
34t
4
5.324
5.254
It
5.3t3
76
59.050
83.430
9.421
5.259
93
58.367
16t
58.204
41
PAGE 18
UMEXPENOED
VILLAGE OF
NOONF PROSPECT
BALANCE
ENCUROERED BALANCE
BUDGET EXPENSE
REPORT
35.912
ACCOUNTING PERIOD
05 ENCING
9130/89
73,950
1988-89
Y-T-D
Y-T-D
CUR MO
STREET DIVISION
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
STREET MAINTENANCE
10.804
1.205.735
64
68.914
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
68,41'!
80
1.000
8
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
80.785
33.650
- 44.873
7.617
TOTAL COMMODITIES
103.500
43,120
29.23t
2.078
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES34.500
181
14.360
1212(7
!•Ilt
TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE
1.65.000
689,570
570.9Z5
245.103
4,000-
1.873,785
780.700
657,246
.305.909
SNOW REMOVAL
26.000
26,000
100
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
IS
91.031
80
25.028
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES"
440
36.010
!7.526
4.485
TOTAL CORMOITIES
T.000
2,910
4
371-
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
70,000
29.160
i j16
1.046
TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL
14.500
6.035
53
197,954
953
171,940
74.t15
IB6572
S.S31
LEAF REMOVAL
54
6.855
20
8,835
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
295,739
979
294,160
65
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
61.425
25,585
5,349
896
TOTAL COMMODITIES
12,000
5,000
16.000
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
14,300
5.950
1,280
t.Zt3
TOTAL LEAF REMOVAL
Z->,000
10,830
IT1966
53
7.8400
1139725
47.365
2Z.679
2*109
STORM SEVER AND BASIN MAINTENANCE
58.140
78
63,969
46
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
66
5.866
5,866
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
42.045
17,510
11,011
2,95!
TOTAL COMMOOITIES
24,000
9.495
25,394
24.084
TOTAL STORM SEWtR AND PASIN MAI NTE
33#413
6,145
I5. 367
29367
tl15.000
1.045
33,750
57,178
29.402
FORESTRY
THFAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CORTRACTUAL S=RVICFS
177,Z50
73.835
84.006
15.059
TOTAL CORMOUIIIES
ZI8,200
90,905
30.246
9,766
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
10.500
4.365
4.814
2,020
TOTAL FORESTRY
45.000
18,750
36.145
104
45).950
187.855
t55,21t
26.949
TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PERSONAE SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
44.370
18.480
18,222
3,610
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
19.600
8.160
50978
1.054
TOTAL TRAFFICZ,000
SIGN MAINTENANCE
810
65.970
27.470
24,200
4,664
s
PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUi1FICATIUV
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
339675
14.025
15.709
Lill
TOTAL COMMODITIES
18.000
4.165
10.000
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
tl.B00
3,665
960
807
TOTAL PUBLIC GROUNDS Br AU7IFICA TIO
127.475
31.240
16,838
6,003
53.095
43,507
7.921
MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
`/#950
4#140
4.084
292
TOTAL COMMODITIES
12,500
S,Z00
70014
5,434
TOTAL MAI NFtNANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY
24.500
10.200
2,429
158
46.950
19,540
I3.52T
5#884
PAGE 18
UMEXPENOED
OMENCUM
%
BALANCE
ENCUROERED BALANCE
BAC
35.912
35.912
44
74,Z69
3t9
73,950
71
22.283
22.283
65
1.084.075
10.485
1,073.590
65
1.216.539
10.804
1.205.735
64
68.914
68,41'!
80
1.000
8
6.992
100
68.954
28
68,926
98
t 4, 500
IS!
I4.349
99
159,368
181
159.t81
89
56,026
56.026
91
4.000-
4,000-
33-
13,020
15
13,005
91
26.000
26,000
100
919046
IS
91.031
80
25.028
25.028
60
1,394-
96
1#490-
6-
367-
4
371-
2-
23.267
100
23#167
Z9
939214
93,244
53
197,954
953
187,001
86
5,686
6
%680
54
6.855
20
8,835
20
295,739
979
294,160
65
26.148
Z6.t48
59
13.622
21
13,601
69
2.000
2.000
100
41.770
21
41,749
63
17.966
IT1966
53
7.8400
24
T.816
89
58#163
22
58.140
78
63,969
46
83#922
66
5.866
5,866
59
5.486
10
5.476
44
ZZ.072
22.011
90
33.424
10
33#413
71
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 413UI89
1988-89 Y -T -D T -T -D CUR MO
STREET DIVISION BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
59.012
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TUTA1 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
100.175
4t*TZ5
4l.lh♦
TOTAL COMMODITIES
3.750
1sS55
- I.I7t
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITURFS
tZZ•300
509955
48*741
TOTALEQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE
4*500
23,,725
1r8T0
60
99
139.643
46.105
41.082
PODL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE
459
3.865
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
864
183
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
6.390
Zr655
2,525
TOTAL COMMODITIES
5•o00
29080
4.217
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES4.800
4.080
3.836
TOTAL PO3L YEMICLF MAINTENANCE
Z3*500
9.785
18''27
4,555
*
44,640
td9600
29.105
TRAFFIC SIGNALS 6 STREET LIGHTING
25.163
34
219145
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL CUMMOUITIES
261#000
IU8.750
Ohl 133
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
6x000
2.500
1,609
ILVSOO
TOTAL TRAFrIC SIGNALS G STREET LTG ZT3.500
4*,�!
4.341
116,040
899842
TOTAL STREET DIVISION
4.2659800
1,777,030
1,569,856
HATER AND SEWER DIVISION
186*6 8
173
!88.485
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
509*789
2,695.4~9
13.123
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVtC£S
122.720
92.165
8t. 944
TTITAL COMMODITIES
566#300
235.410
220.640
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
21.000
t*000
9.155
!0.225
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION
It*TTS
411
11.773
AND SUPPORT
1,414,700
589,355
424x411
MAINTENA14CL OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS
100
69.161
442,240
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
40,675
16,940
10.040
fOfAC COMMODITIES
91.000
4:ST4
ZrOl4
TOTAL CAPITAL -EXPENDITURES
12.000
4.995
1.591
TOTAL MAINTENAN{:c OF PUBLIC BUILOI
65x0
830
8.481
*475
IT. 340
13.650
MAINTENANCE OF 6RMNDS
10*409
87
404
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMODITIES
43.010
t7.9tO
2!,664
709122 CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
S,4Q0
2.250
1,665
TOTAL MAINTENANCE Of GROUNDS
400
48.810
165
20,325 #
Z3,334
'WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE i REPAIR
673
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
138,465
57,660
569740
TOTAL COMMODITIES
229`000
459405
24,040
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
14.500
89125
3.949
T11f42 WATEt SUPPLY MAINTFNANCE C R
31.000
15.425
16.932
25x476
4 23,905
1
116.60S
1001 6159
PAGE 14
UNEXPENDED UNENCUM %
BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL
7034
59.012
!
2.579
54,029
59
10.59900
73.54;
24
2.574
69
l@*4 JT
4#SOO
24
73.524
4.476
60
99
139.643
53
!39.590
61
459
3.865
864
183
3 .865
60
728
5,964
783
16
4
15*960
61
2,0 SL
4.573
22
4,555
*
14
15.!85
25.163
34
219145
1TZ,T6T
519
172.767
66
4*,�!
4.341
T3
21.664
I1.500
113
11.327
98
186*6 8
173
!88.485
68
509*789
2,695.4~9
13.123
2.682.821
63
179063
51.274
140.T16
-
140.716
6;
1.228
345,66!
I7
345.643
61
It*TTS
2
11.773
54
!*000
1.000
100
69.161
442,240
491.138
at
990, Z9
19
990:270
TO
JZS
30,635
30,635
75
79
8.98!
8.481
82
109404
10*409
87
404
2.000
2.000
Loo
SZ:OZS
52.015
i9
2.518
21.342
673
Zt.341
50
3.T35
3,135
69
3.191
400
25,w76
400
100
25x476
52
10*391
5,252
81,657
82.657
59
561
204*960
ZO
204.940
89
1.385
16*35L
26
16.315
84
169584
20.068
50
20.028
54
323,036
96
;72,940
16
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD OS ENDING 9/3D%89
1988-89 Y -T -O f -T -O CUR N0
NATER ANO SEWER DIVISION BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
NATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. E RLPR.
286-
UNENCUM
%
"DEAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
135.115
56,245
45.792
TOTAL COMMODITIES
16.600
6.915
5.993
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
S3.TOO
21.120
13.330
TOTAL MATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. 6
ZT8��5
31.695
14.614
61.386
49273,767
115.445
89,T29
MATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT.
69
188.617
68
TOTAL PERSONAL S€RVICES
32.152
43
TOTAL CDNTRA.TUAL SERVICES
74.470
31.020
42.318
TOTAL COMMODIIIES
700
290
LT3
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
T •700
13,620
11.774
TOTAL WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAIN
1Z8.000
35.870
71.665
18,125
31,330
56.595
72,390
NATER METER IMSTAL.REPR.6 REPL.
287
29.789
82
TOTAL PE'tSONAL SERVICES
71.483
90
TOTAL CONTRA-TUAL SERVICES
63.020
26,250
31640
TOTAL COMMODITIES
3b, 500
150200
6,424
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURE
79.600
33.155
8.117
TOTAL WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.L RE
LS.
10.415
68
56.341
ZD},12o IZ
85.020
46.231
E08IPMENT MAINTENANCE C OPERATIONS
8.000
too
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
1170110
48.785
53,395
TOTAL COMMODITIES
30000
1.250
963
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
91.700
38.205
35,359
TOTAL EQUIPNENT MAI RTEAAMCE E OPER
8.000
21
3,330
30
35.215
.810
910STO
89,717
SANITARY SE WR MAINT. E REPAIR
2.682
441.31$
99
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
2,682
441. 3l8
99
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
60,805
25e3Z5
32.573
TOTAL COMMODITIES
1,000
2.915
2.718
TOTAL SAYL(ARY ScNER MINT. E REPA
90000
76.805
3.745
6,299
31,985
41.590
NATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL
444,000
184.995
NATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
K44,000
184.995
SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CAPITAL EX'Pf\QI TURES
000
286
TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
95
39.580
1.088
0000
39.580
1.3'1
&ARE MICHIGAN WATER ACOUISITIOM
TOTAL PERSONAL Si:RVICES
5.500
TOTAL CO`LTRA�TUAL SERVICES 196+00.000
TOTAL CAPITAL
20290
683,325
660.664
ERPEYDRVICES
TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACDOISITZ,97)••5pq
000
551.080
539.890
1237.695
1.200.554
TOTAL MATER AMC SEWER DIVISION 6,317.5
0
1 1,957,060
1.103,847
5.849
2.802
5.816
t4.467
10.164
4.673
(4.831
4.502
1,019
3.315
8.836
8.818
102
69781
is.eol
593811
946
6.327
1.063
1,063
146,607
107.492
254.099
405.179
PAGE 20
UNEXPENDED
286-
UNENCUM
%
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED
BALANCE
HAL
89.323
5,900
89.323
b6
!0.607
66
10.541
64
27.370
3
Z7,367
54
61.386
49273,767
61.386
at
108.666
69
188.617
68
32,152
32.152
43
521
527
15
20.926
16
20.910
64
90875
9,875
35
63.440
16
63.464
47
31,330
31,330
50
30,077
287
29.789
82
71.483
71.483
90
25.000
25.000
too
157.890
287
157.602
77
63.715
63.715
54
2,037
29037
68
56.341
6
56.335
61
8.000
8.000
too
130,093
6
130.087
59
28,232
28.232
46
4.202
4.282
61
2.TOt
2.101
30
35.215
35.215
46
444,000
2.682
441.31$
99
444,000
2,682
441. 3l8
99
286-
286-
0
93,914
6.332 87.582
92
93.628
6.332 87,296
92
5,900
5,500
loo
979.336
979.336
60
785.110
T85.110
59
t"169 946
1.769,946
60
49273,767
9,SOT 4.264,256
67
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERYICFS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMMOOITIES
TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
PARKING LOT MAIMTENANLt
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL CORMODITIES
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
TOTAL PARKING LUT MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
ENGINEERING DIVISION
PURLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING
TOTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES I,
TOTAL CIOT#TODITIES
TOTAL SOLI? WASTE DISPOSAL to
TOTAL REFtnE DISPOSAL DIVISION 1•
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING, 4!30!84
t988-89 V -T -D Y -T -O CUR NO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
119735
4:885
5.212
903
629630
26.090
I1.486
27939
747365
30,975
167758
3,842
4,045
1,705
575
200
IG e Too
4.455
2,911
605
5.000
20080
1.2S6
b10
677300
280030
45.748
17385
87,095
36.270
507550
2.860
161,460
67.245
67.308
67702
7s900
7427000 !25,830 526.947
[7000 830 73.468
7449000 726,660 608,315
744.00O 726
.660 608,315
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
3.520
86
28
DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRUC TIUN
12
3.744
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENO1TURES
TOTAL DENT SERVICE EXPENSE
555.735
2319545
4157844
TOTAL DOWNTOWN RIDE 141.250
MELOIMIFNt CONS( 690.985
58.845
71,323
369
93,763
290.390
48/.172
COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL CAPITAL
12,000
5.000
EXPENDITURES
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
80.000
33 ,330
[7.282
TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS
2507000
342.000
104.165
142.495
17.281
GENERAL EQUIP E IRPRVM4TS
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURFS
TOTAL GENERAL EQUIP
500,000
208.330
3.979
L IMPRVMMTS
a
500,000
208.330
3,914
TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
---_---_--
538
t485
, .
8417215
5067432
866
198.tio
144,036
L49.036
3.140
3,140
37140
PAGE 21
ONEXPENOED UMENCUM Z
BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL
67463
51.144
57.607
3.520
Ts7Z9
3,144
217552
36. Spy
94.152
T7 900-
1.215.053
T1.468 -
I.135.685
1.135,685
t397886
69.928
Z09. 814
72.000
62• T19
250.000
32 47 71 e
6,463 S5
51.144 81
O
57.607 71
7.900- 0
1.215.053 TO
7t.468- 573-
t.1357685 65
19135.685 65
74 139,812 25
69,92? 50
74 209,739 30
!2.000 100
629719 18
250,000 100
324.719 95
496.021 Z.040 493.981 99
496,021 2.040 443.98( 99
1,030,554 2.114 17028,439 67
3.520
86
28
7.101
12
3.744
75
361
ZT.l9t
3t
389
36.tS6
42
369
93,763
SB
7.900- 0
1.215.053 TO
7t.468- 573-
t.1357685 65
19135.685 65
74 139,812 25
69,92? 50
74 209,739 30
!2.000 100
629719 18
250,000 100
324.719 95
496.021 Z.040 493.981 99
496,021 2.040 443.98( 99
1,030,554 2.114 17028,439 67
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET
EXPENSE REPORT
PAGE 22
ACCOUNTING PERfOD
05 ENDING
9130!89
1988-89
Y -T -O
Y -T -D
CUR NO
C AND CIVIC SERVICES
BUDGET
ESTIMATE
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
UNEXPENDED
UNENCUM
=
COMMUNITY
CDMMUNtTV GROUPS
BALANCE
ENCUMBERED BALANCE
BAIL
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL CUMMUNITY GROUPS
14s100
!49100
Sr 870
6,840
400
7.260
5.870
6.840
q00
7,260
7.160
51
'ST" (IF JULY t CIVIC EVENTS. ETC.
7.260
51
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
15.500
6x450
I2.909
2.591
TOTAL COMMODITIES
14.500
6.040
14, Sit
225
2s54I
17
6.050
TOTAL 4TM IF JULY E CIVIC EVENTS, 36.050
2.510
5.482
32 _
32-
O
15.000
32.923568
2Z5
568
4
HOLIDAY DECORATIONS
3.127
3.121
9
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL StRVICC,
2.050
8 .500
850
3.540
Zr 050
f OTAt COMMODITIES
TOTAL HOLIDAY OECORATIDNS
BOD
330
3.595
4.905
2,050
5? 8
4,4 8
100
57
11.350800
4s720
3,S95
800
too
TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
7.755
57 7.698
68
61,500
24.590
43.358
625
-----
18.142
57 [8,085
24
LIBRARY SERVICES
LIRRARY OPERATIONS
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL
2.219.400
92h 740
LIBR41tV OPERATIONS
2.214,400
924.740
2x219,400
2.219,400
100
TOTAL LillRARY SERTICES
2.219,4,00
2,Z19,400
t00
-- ----------------------
2 . 214 ,400
9249740
�____��-_��_��
2. .400219
- 2.219.400
100
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
TOTAL OEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION
1,[86,950
494.530
36 6.812
3
BONDS
tsld6,950
494:530
366.812
396"
820.142
820,138
64
SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS
820,142
820,138
69
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICE
102.815
42,815
27,167
AREA BONDS10_
� .815
42.815
27.167
75,648
75.648
74
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNt1S
75.648
75.648
74
--------------------------
i. 289.765
537.345
393.979
3*644
895,790
895,786
69
PENSION FUNDS
EMPLOYEE PENSIONS
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL EMPLOYEE PFNSIONS
586.600
244.405
259.693
499111
586.0
2,.,4.405
259.643
44911t
326.907
326,407
56
POLICE PENSIONS
32 b•907
326.907
56
TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS
1,525.000
635 •405
191,14#6
409275
1s525,O00
635,405
2919146
40.275
2,333,854
19333.854
87
FIR EMENS PE NSIDM1S
Is333.854
1.333.854
87
fUtAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE
TOTAL FIREMENS PENSIONS
1.657.000
6909405
441.983
311,646
1.6579000
640.405
441.983
311.648
1.215.017
19215:017
T3
1:225.O17
t9It59O17
73
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9/30/B9
1988-89 T -T -D T -T -D CDR NO
TOTAL PENSION FUNDS SODGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
3:768-600 1e5T0:215 892:822
40te032
PAGE 23
BNEXPERDED UNEMCUM %
BALANCE £NCUMSEREO BALANCE BAC
2#875.718 2*BTS.TTB Tb
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 05 ENDING 9130!84
14188-89 Y-T-O T-T-D CUR MO
BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
TOTAL BUDGET EXPENSE 35,403,205
12*026,503
14#749,p440 2v505.534
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, the children of Mount Prospect always anticipate
the fun and festivity associated with the age-old custom
Of HALLOWEEN "Trick or Treats" by going from door to door
in their immediate neighborhoods, displaying their
costumes, and requesting "treats"; and
WHEREAS, the possibility of accidents is an everpresent
threat and motorists should be even more alert; and
WHEREAS, it would appear that parents generally favor the
afternoon daylight hours for "trick or treat" outings,
since the period permits greater visibility and tends to
limit participation to younger children for whom the
observance was originally intended.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village
of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim that HALLOWEEN,
also known as TRICK OR TREAT DAY, shall be observed on
Tuesday, October 31, 1989. 1 do further ask that both
children --,,i ,�.-rents cooperate in conducting the time of
"trick or treat" activities between the hours of 2:00
P.M. to dusk.
I also ask that Younger children be accompanied by
Parents or other responsible adults to assure the safety
of our children.
Finally, I urge the cooperation of all citizens, both
young and old, to make this a happy and safe occasion for
all our children.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
'Earol A. Fields
Village
Village Clerk
Dated this 17th day of October, 1989
Village of lount Prospect
Mourn Proswt, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: OCTOBER 4, 1989
SUBJECT: OWNERSHIP CHANGE - PEPE'S RESTAURANT
208 EAST RAND ROAD
I met with Dennis Sanello and David Belvedere who are the prospective purchasers of
the Pepe's franchise on Rand Road. They presently own a franchise in the City of
Chicago and David Belvedere has been involved with Pepe's for four years and Dennis
Sanello for seven years. For the last four years, they have owned the franchise in
Chicago. They presently hold a liquor license in the City of Chicago and there does not
appear to have been any problems raised since they have been owners.
They know the present owner of the franchise in MountProspectand feel they can bring
the same enhancements and benefits to this franchise as they have done in Chicago. Of
the 68 Pepe's franchise operations, the Chicago operation ranks number three.
They anticipate spending a considerable sum of money for remedial work at this
establishment including development of a better atmosphere, extensive painting and
decorating along with carpeting and a new roof that need to be done in the near future.
Since this is a franchise operation, they .will stay with the same menu and offer any new
foods that the franchise might offer in the future. They also intend to keep the hours
the same as they are presently. The two potential owners are aware of the Ordinances
of the Village that require them to serve food as the major operation.
They will be present at the Board meeting on October 17. They would like to complete
the sale and transfer as soon after they are approved for a liquor license as possible.
0
0
JFD/rcw J06:MON DI�N
attachment
V I L L A G E 0 F M 0 U N T P R 0, P E C T
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
LOCAL LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR RETAIL LIQUOR DEALER'S LICENSE
RENEWAL DATE
NEW x ($150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of new Liquor
License; one-time only fee)
Honorable Carolyn H. Krause, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known
as Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day
of January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of
Mount Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois:
The undersigned, DADE I, INC. BY DENNIS SANELLO & DAVID BELVEDERE
hereby makes application for a Class h liquor dealer's license for the period
ending April 30, 19 90 1 and tenders the sum of $ 2,000.00 +- $1.5.0.0-Othe
prescribed fee as set forth in the following:
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR- DEALERS' LICENSES (Section, 13.106):
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL.
DADE I, INC.
Your petitioner, DENNIS SANELLO & DAVID BELVEDERE
doing business as PEPE IS MEXICAN RESTAURANT
respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at
208 E. RAND RD. . Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Annual Fee
CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises
$ 2,500.00
CLASS B: Consumption on premises only
2,000.00
CLA55 C: Retail package only
2,000.00
CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only
750-00
CLASS E: Caterer's license
2,000.00
CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine,
consumption on premises only
750.00
CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment
2,000.00
CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises
2,500.00
CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non -
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises
1,750.00
CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only
2,000.00
CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge
2,500-00
CLASS T: Bowling Alley
2,500.00
CLASS V: Retail package - wine only
1,500.00
CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine
only and at dining tables only
1,500.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED
1,000.00
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL.
DADE I, INC.
Your petitioner, DENNIS SANELLO & DAVID BELVEDERE
doing business as PEPE IS MEXICAN RESTAURANT
respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at
208 E. RAND RD. . Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Description and Name of Premises: PEPE' S MEXICAN RESTAURANT
Description must be c: gil, re floor fronta�� ic.
WHEELING TRU9T SAVIIIGS B K, TRUST NO. 74-251 &
Name of Owner of Premises: TED DIMIROPOULOS & BILL PISSIOS
If Owner of record is a land trustee, attach copy of Land Trust Agreement.
If not Owner, does applicant have a lease?-yyS_ State date applicant's
lease expires: 5/94 If not owner, attach copy of lease hereto.
Is applicant an individual,ra corporation""A co-partnership,or an association? (Circle one)
If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number
and Social Security Number:
If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number
and Social Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits
thereof:
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation:
If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois,
indicate date qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact
business in Illinois:
If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers,
and Social Security Numbers of officers and directors. Also list the names,
addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders
owning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such corporation.
03M
—DRINNIS SANFLT10—
Date of Birth:
Date of Birth -L--
- Lcr—
Date of Birth:
ADDRESS
1070 COTTONWOOD LN.
Social Security #A11KA
YnTnfaf 44;Aog /"ev
Social Security it A"- "-
Social Security #
OFFICE AND/OR
PERCENT OF
STOCK HELD
17
m,3'. s-4
Phone
, ie
Phone
Phone #
Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone #
Objects for which organization is formed:
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the
applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents,
or stockholders ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? Ve
If so, explain:___
If applicant is an individual, state age: Marital Status:
Is applicant a citizen of the United States? yE5 If a naturalized citizen,
state date and place of naturalization:
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next
prior to the filing of this application? NEW PURCHASE OF BUSINESS
Local Address: 208 E RAND RD - Telephone No. 870-7270
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: RESTAURANT
SERVING FOOD ITEMS & ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time: $5,000.00
FOOD INVENTORY
APPLICANT HAS OPERATED A PEPE'S
How long has applicant been in this business?AT qlqQ
CENTRAL AVE., CHICAGO, IL FOR 2 YEARS
Is the applicant an elected public official? No If so, state the
particulars thereof:
Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business
an elected public official?
In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the
applicant made any political contributions within the past .2 years? NO
If so, state the particulars thereof:
Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? NO If so, designate
title:
Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device
Stamp? NO If so, state the reasons therefor:
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by
any of subsections (a) (3) through (a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as
prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 19611" as heretofore
or hereafter amended? NO If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other
license on premises other than described in this application? YES If so,
state disposition of such application: APPLICANT HOLDS A LI U R
THE PEPE'S RESTAURANT LOCATED AT 3130 N. CENTRAL CHICAGO,
Is applicant qualified to receive state and federal license to operate an
alcoholic liquor business? YES Has applicant ever had a previous license
revoked by the federal government or by any state or subdivision thereof?
NO If so, explain:
Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or
thing construed by this Ordinance, the laws of this state or other
Ordinances of this Village? NO
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois,
the United States of America, or any of the Ordinances of the Village of
Mount Prospect in the conduct of his place of business? YES
Does applicant currently carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? YES If "Yes,"
attach copy. ( WILL APPLY FOR DRAM SHOP INSURANCE UPON ISSUANCE OF
LIQUOR LICENSE )( SEE ATTACHED FOR OTHER LOCATION )
If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry
Dram Shop Insurance coverage? _ N (If the answer to either of the foregoing
questions is "No," no license shall issue.)
Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the
time of filing? XRo,
State name and address of each surety next below:
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security
Number of manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application
is made I'll 1 11
7 COIJON,D T.N- PALAIMR. TL A(1()67
DOB: 4-22-53 SS: 322-46-4042 TELEPHONE: (312) 705-0442
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
DENNIS SANELLO
DAVID BELVEDER
Corporate Seal
(If applicant is corporation)
Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that T hey is/are
the applicant for the license requested in the foregoing application; that
-
The Y is/are of good repute, character and standing, and that answers to
the questions asked in the foregoing application are true and correct in
every detail.
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) 55.
COUNTY OF COOK )
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 7 day of A.D., 19 k7
ORM 3EK
ft* IL JM0
MdRy PWAC,
Stift of nro*
My Nomb" b0nis Jdy M 1991
APPLICATION APPROVED:
Notary Plubli
Local Liquor Control Commissioner
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE I OF CHAPTER 17
ENTITLED "VEHICLE LICENSE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 17.103-0 entitled (License Fees) of
Chapter 17 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said
Section 17.103.0 of Chapter 17 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect shall be and read as follows:
C. Second division vehicles:
1. Motor trucks, tractor -semitrailer units and
a. A self-propelled vehicle operated as a tractor
and one semitrailer shall be considered as one
vehicle in computing the above license fees,
and no additional license fee shall be required
for said semitrailer so used.
b. The owner of each vehicle who has elected to
pay a mileage weight tax to the State of
Illinois shall be required to be licensed as
provided in the Chapter.
2. Motor Buses with State of Illinois license plate
designating "School Bus" owned and operated by a
commercial enterprise shall pay an annual fee of Ten
Dollars ($10.00) for each such vehicle bearing said
"School Bus" designation.
3. Motor Buses with State of Illinois license plate
designation "School Bus" owned and operated by any
governmental agency or not-for-profit organization
shall have the annual license fee waived.
4. A Class W passenger automobile with State of
Illinois license plate designation 11CV11 owned and
motor buses that do not bear a State
of Illinois
license plate with
the "School Bus"
designation:
Gross Weight
in Lbs. of Vehicle
Annual
Class
. . ...... Plus
Its
Maximum Load
License Fee
B
8,000
or
less
$ 30.00
D
8,001
to
12,600
$ 45.00
F
12,001
to
16,000
$ 60.00
H
16,001
to
24,000
$ 70.00
1
24,001
to
28,000
$ 80.00
K
28,001
to
32,000
$ 85.00
N
32,001
to
40,000
$105.00
P
40,001
to
45,000
$110.00
R
45,001
to
50,000
$120.00
S
50,001
to
59,000
$125.00
T
59,001
to
64,000
$130.00
V
64,001
to
73,280
$140.00
X
73,281
to
77,000
$150.00
Z
77,001
to
80,000
$160.00
a. A self-propelled vehicle operated as a tractor
and one semitrailer shall be considered as one
vehicle in computing the above license fees,
and no additional license fee shall be required
for said semitrailer so used.
b. The owner of each vehicle who has elected to
pay a mileage weight tax to the State of
Illinois shall be required to be licensed as
provided in the Chapter.
2. Motor Buses with State of Illinois license plate
designating "School Bus" owned and operated by a
commercial enterprise shall pay an annual fee of Ten
Dollars ($10.00) for each such vehicle bearing said
"School Bus" designation.
3. Motor Buses with State of Illinois license plate
designation "School Bus" owned and operated by any
governmental agency or not-for-profit organization
shall have the annual license fee waived.
4. A Class W passenger automobile with State of
Illinois license plate designation 11CV11 owned and
Chapter 17
Page 2 of
operated by any not-for-profit organization shall
have the annual license fee waived, provided,
however, that no more than one (1) such license fee
shall be waived for said not-for-profit organization
in any given licensing year.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
419* *9W,
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1989.
VijuIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL-,
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEW::--':�F�1-1—
SUBJECT: ZBA-59-V-89, CHARLES DRESSNER
LOCATION: 1512 LARCH DRIVE
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1989
The applicant is requesting the following variations:
1. Variation to allow a swimming pool to remain in the back yard 6 feet from the
rear and side property lines instead of 15 feet and 10 feet respectively.
2. Variation to allow a swimming pool 1 foot from a utility easement instead of 15
feet from an underground electrical conductor.
2. Variation to allow the existing 4 foot high fence to remain instead of installing
at least a 4'-6" fence surrounding the pool or the perimeter of the yard.
Mr. Dressner appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 5, 1989 and
presented his case. He stated that he has already installed the 27 foot diameter above
ground pool in this location unaware that be needed a permit to do so. Mr. Dressner
presented a number of letters submitted by the neighbors supporting his request. None
of these neighbors were present at the meeting to voice their support. The Village staff
stated their opposition to these requested variations based upon safety concerns, such as,
the pool being too close to the lot line, and the reduced fence height.
Mrs. Dore, who lives directly behind the Dressner's was present to object to the requested
variations. She was concerned with the potential flooding from this pool and also the
visual impact it has on her and her neighbors, along with the safety concerns for
neighborhood children.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the issues among themselves and decided that it
would be setting a bad precedent to allow a Pool so close to the rear and side property
lines, as proposed. They also were very concerned about the safety issue of the steel pool
being so close to the underground electric current.
John F. Dixon - Page 2
ZBA-59-V-89
October 10, 1989
They then voted 0-4 to deny all requested variations stating that Mr. Dressner had ample
space in his rear yard to shift the pool and still meet Code. There was discussion among
the Board members and the neighbor that a 5 foot high board -on -board wood fence along
the perimeter of the yard would minimize any visual impact on the neighbors.
PB:hg
Approved:
Nv�ja M. Clements, Director
4/7
ZUlc.*h c-
,p6<
A
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 59-V-89
Hearing Date: October 5, 1989
PETITIONER:
Charles Dressner
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 19, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1512 Larch Drive
REQUEST:
Variations from Section 21-902.B to
allow a 61 setback from rear
property line to an above ground
pool and a 61 setback from the side
property line instead of 10 feet;
Section 21.908 to allow a 41 high
fence around the Pool; and Section
21.918.B to allow the pool to be
located 11 from the utility easement
instead of 15, from a
utility line.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:,
Len Petrucelli
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Michelle Dore
Mr. Charles Dressner, 1512 Larch Drive, Petitioner, stated that he had
installed a Pool and had not known that a Permit was required for an
above -ground swimming Pool. The installation is complete and it is
too close to the rear and side property line for Code requirements. A
41 high fence surrounds the property which has been there prior to his
owning the home.
Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that hardship was the
main question in this case. There is sufficient room to relocate the
Pool while meeting Code requirements. It would seem reasonable to
require a higher fence for safety purposes. Safety is also the factor
in moving the pool away from underground utility lines.
Mrs. Michelle Dore, 1764 E. Camp McDonald, neighbor to the rear of the
property, indicated three concerns in leaving the pool where it is;
the question of the utilities, the safety factor, and aesthetics. A
site plan denoting the immediate area was given to the Board for
review. Utilities affected include the gas line which borders between
ZBA CASE 59-V-89
Page Two
the two homes, the electric line, cable television, and the telephone
line. The telephone lox in the corner of the Dressner yard is the
main junction box .for the area and sine* this area of the yard is the
low spot, any standing water will cause loss of ,service for many
residents. Mrs. Dore has a family member who is a complete invalid
and the telephone is a life -line to emergency help.
Mrs. Dore also pointed out the safety of the neighborhood children,
who being naturally curious, find a pool an inviting adventure.
Installing a higher fence would be helpful, however, it was stated
that the fence separating the Dore and Dressner yards is owned by Mrs.
Dore and she does net want that expense to fall to her. Noise
carry-over duringparties was cited and Mrs. Dore believes the pool
detracts from the overall appearance of the neighborhood. She asked
that the pool be dismantled' or that all zoning requirements be
maintained.
Mr. Dressner indicatd that he understood the utility problem and he
would also not object to putting up a fence.
Ear. "Gannon explained that moving the pool 'would have a greater impact
on the Dore family. Landscape screening was discussed and it was the
consensus of the Board that the pool be moved and conform to all
Zoning Ordinances.
Upon motion by Ms. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved
to grant variations from: 1) Section 21.902.B to allow a 6' setback
from the rear property line to an above -ground pool instead of 151 and
a 6" setback from the side property line to the swimming pool instead
of 10"; 2) Section 21.908 to allow a 41 high fence instead of 4161"
surrounding the pool; and 3) Section 21.918.B to allow the pool to be
located 11 from the utility easement for underground electric current
instead of 15" from any electric cables. All as shown on Petitioner's
Exhibit 1.
Upon roll call: Ayes: None
Nayes Lannon, Brothers. Basnik, Brettrager'
By ,a vote of 0-4, the motion was denied. Village ,Board action will be
required for this case.
Eileen M. .Reinhard
Recording Secretary
ViliA AGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL
PLANNING AM ZONING MPARTMNT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEk<-
SUBJECT- ZBA-59-V-89, CHARLES DRESSNER
LOCATION: 1512 LARCH DRIVE
DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting the following variations:
1. Section 21.902.13 to allow a 6 foot setback from the rear property line to an
tKrrU&S�& pwl"Call-rat
above- und
to the swimming pool instead of 10 feet.
2. Section 21.908 to allow a 4- foot high fence instead of 4'-6" surrounding the pool.
3. Section 21.918.13 to allow the pool to be located 1 foot from the utility easement
for underground electric current instead of 15 feet from the electric line.
Inspection Services Department recommends at least a 10 foot setback from both property
lines, The location of the underground electric cable should be verified by J.U.1-I.E. If
electric or cable lines are located closer than 5 feet to the pool, they recommend that either
the cable or the pool be relocated to another pan of the yard. With regards to the fence
variation, the Inspection Services Department recommends that at least a 4 1/2 foot high
fence be located around the perimeter of the yard as a safety precaution. Although they
realize the swimming pool has already been installed, building permits and inspections will
be required before it is able to be used legally.
Mr. Dressner lives in a single family neighborhood on the northeast side of the Village. He
has a standard size lot with a fairly large open back yard. Mr. Dressner has already
installed a swimming pool, 27' in diameter, in the rear comer of his lot as indicated on the
site plan. The pool wall is located 6 feet from the side property line and 6 feet from the
rear property line. There are also 5 foot wide utility easements along the side and rear
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-59-V-89
September 27, 1989
property fines, in which an under -ground electric cable is located. Mr. Dressner did not
receive a building permit for the swimming pool before installing it. He also had an
existing 4 foot high fence around the property for many years and wishes to keep the same
height.
Our main question with this request is the hardship. As indicated by the site plan
submitted, there is sufficient room in the yard to relocate the pool and still meet all of the
Zoning Code requirements. Also, it doesn't seem unreasonable to require a higher fence,
for safety reasons. Safety is our major concern in reviewing this case. The underground
electric current may be as close as 2 feet from the steel wall of the pool. The location of
this cable should be verified by J.U.LI.E. The greater the separation between the pool and
the cable, the safer the situation is. It would seem to us that it would be much easier to
shift the pool away from this comer than to have the utility company relocate the electric
cable.
In summary, there doesn't seem to be a hardship for leaving the pool and fence as is, except
for the actual relocation labor itself. Safety to a large degree and the visual impact this
pool has on the immediate neighbors to a lesser degree, is enough for us to recommend
against these variations.
PB:hg
Vj�LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC.--
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER��
SUBJECT: ZBA-60-SU-89, ZBA-61-V-89, ELIZABETH M. MAGNONE
LOCATION: 2234 WEST LINCOLN
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1989
Ms. Magnone appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on October 5, 1989 to request
the following:
1. A special use permit to allow a three car garage
2. A variation to allow a 792 square foot garage instead of 600 square feet.
3. A variation to allow 30 foot wide driveway instead of 21 feet.
Ms. Magnone explained to the Board that she would like all the cars in her family to be
garaged, thereby necessitating a three car garage. Additional storage space in the large
garage would be used for various garden equipment.
The staff pointed out that a three car garage size for a large house on a large lot is
reasonable and is becoming more common. Presently, the house is under construction with
permits approved for a two car garage and a large storage area which can be converted to
a third stall if the special use is approved.
It is staffs opinion that the proposed 30 foot wide driveway from the garage to the street
is justified in this instance since the garage faces an exterior side property line and there
is only 20' to the property line. The additional driveway width is necessary for maneuvering.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the large size of the three car garage and decided
that since the footprint for the house and the garage is already there, it makes no difference
whether the extra storage space is made part of the house or the garage, therefore, they
decided to leave the 792 square foot garage size as proposed in the motion. The Board
then voted to approve the special use for a three car garage by a vote of 4-0 and the
variations for a 792 square foot size and a 30 foot driveway width from the garage to the
property line, by a vote of 4-0. There were no neighbors or objectors present to voice their
concerns of this case.
Approved:
Uavia M. Clements, Director
0
I
ZS I , t— r L rlAj
vPc
00
—� p(pE
A(^- an/Are saw
I
33'
N A 00 see 'o -W-'//
IMT op scalmlNG
kA"
MOLD04 V UW AND a GWM WC
Paw
state of 111 0
cowry Of=
jot:lr 1r
42. W. I- 9s .r
OM1110 SURVI*Y Co @=
03 3w r ".
sun%w the 40MO describa. �Z" . I. OW fl�
2s.r l.r
OrwWo IS to - -Pltrw WVW Of wWd pwAWA
KtQ, ILL. LN4 Sw%*
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 60 -SU, 61-V-89
Hearing Date: October 5, 1989
PETITIONER:
Elizabeth M. Magnone
PUBLICATION DATE:
September 19, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
2234 West Lincoln
REQUEST:
Special Use to allow a three -car
garage as per Section 14.1001.C.6
and variations from Section
14.102.B.4 to allow a 792 square
foot garage and Section 14.3016.A.3
for a 30 foot wide driveway.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:
Len Petrucelli
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
None
Ms. Elizabeth Magnone, 314 S. Helena, Petitioner, stated that she is
currently building a new home at 2234 West Lincoln and is requesting a
three car garage since they have more than two cars. A portion of the
792 square feet will be used for storage of the lawnmower, snowmobile,
etc. The 301 driveway width is requested since the drive is so short.
Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that this is a one
acre lot zoned R -X Single Family located on the far west edge of the
Village. Permits have been issued for construction of a 5,000 square
foot single family home and most of the shell is already up. The
three -car garage request is becoming normal for expensive homes on
large lots. The garage will face Hickory Avenue and will be located
20 feet back from the property line. Mr. Bednar noted that 792 square
feet is significantly larger than the Board has previously approved
and the size should be Justified. No negative impact is anticipated.
Mr. Brettrager requested clarification on the 30, driveway and 381
drive shown on the plans. It was noted that the plans were not drawn to
scale and the drive would be 30, wide all the way to the property line
since the distance covered is so short and a taper would not look
right. The storage area of the garage was discussed and it was the
consensus of the Board not to have the Petitioner separate the storage
area from the garage area.
ZBA CASE 60 -SU, ---V-89
Page Two
Upon motion by Ms. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved
to grant a Special Use per Section 14-100I.C.6 to allow a three car
garage as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Brettrager, Basnik
Nayes: None
By a vote of 4-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be
required.
Mr. Lannon, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant variations from
Section 14.102.8.4 to allow a 792 square foot garage size instead of
600 square feet and from Section 14.301.6-A.3 to allow a 30, maximum
driveway width instead of 21 feet allowed by Code also as shown on
Petitioner's Exhibit #1.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Brettrager, Basnik
Nayes: None
By a vote of 4-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be
required.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL-i
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
..........
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEReT7J—�
SUBJECT: ZBA-60-SU-89, ZBA-61-V-89, ELIZABETH M. MAGNONE
LOCATION: 2234 WEST LINCOLN
DATE: SEPTEMBER 28, 1989
REQUES
The applicant is requesting a special use to allow a three -car garage as per Section
14.1001.C.6 and variations to the following sections:
1. Section 14.102.13.4 to allow a 792 square foot garage instead of 600 square feet.
2. Section 14.3016.A-3 for a 30 foot wide driveway instead of 21 feet.
V9LLAGE STAFF COMMEM -
The Inspection Services Department notes that building permits were issued for this new
home for foundations only. The approved building permits show an attached two -car
garage with a large storage area which could be converted to a third car stall, if approved
by the Zoning Board. They also note that the drawings submitted for this special use
request show a driveway width of 38 feet at the garage tapering to 30 feet at the property
fine. The application states a 30 foot maximum width is requested. It appears that the
drawing submitted is not -to -scale. The Engineering Department notes that the drive should
taper to 21 feet at the property line. No other comments or objections were received from
staff regarding this case.
!.I_ � - � e Ima! Xpo" an Ws �
This one acre lot is zoned R -X Single Family and is located at the corner of Hickory and
Lincoln Street on the far west edge of the Village. Permits have been issued for Mrs.
Magnone to construct an approximate 5,000 square foot single family home on this large
lot.
The principal request is that of a special use to allow a three -car garage on this lot. The
special use standards must be met. It is becoming more common to see such requests when
large expensive single family homes are constructed on the remaining lots in town. It has
been normal practice for the Zoning Board of Appeals to approve such three -car garage
if located on a large-sized lot without impacting the neighborhood. This garage would face
Gil Basnik - Page
September 28, 1989
Hickory Avenue and be located 20 feet back from the property line. We would not expect
any negative impacts to the surrounding neighborhood as a result of a three -car garage on
this large property.
Variations for the size of the garage and driveway width are necessitated if a three -car
garage is allowed. The proposed 792 square foot size of the garage would not necessarily
be required for a three -cu garage, therefore, the petitioner must justify this large size.
With regards to the driveway, as Village staff indicated above, drawings submitted seem to
indicate a 38 foot width at the garage doors. The legal notice and variation request is for
a 30 foot wide drive at the garage which Planning and Zoning can support. We suspect
that the drawing submitted was not drawn, to scale. Although it has become standard to
taper wide driveways to 21 feet at the property lines in most cases, it would be more
difficult in this situation since the driveway is only 20 foot long. Because of the long length
of frontage on Hickory (224 feet) and the large size of this lot, we would have no problem
with a 30 foot wide driveway from the garage to the property line.
In summary, the petitioner must meet the standards set forth in the special use section for
a three -car garage. If the three -car garage is approve it necessitates a wider than allowed
drive and a larger garage size than 600 square feet. However, the size of the garage at 792
square feet must be justified before approving any variation.
PB:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNTPROSPEC
PLANNING NND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOUIN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER7
SUBJECT: ZBA-65-V.89, STEVEN MARTENS
LOCATION: 214 NOW -1 SCHOOL STREET
DATE: OCTOBER 10, 1.989
'The applicant is requeting a variation from the Zoning Code in order to allow a new room
addition to be 4 feet from the existing detached garage. Code normally requires a 1() footseparation, Zn t,
Mr. Martens appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on Coctober 5 to present lhk
case. Fie stated that he has a small sized home which he needs to expand i'nr his new
is
f'arnilv, AlthOL'(411 Ile located s rom aas ra from oarav
c1le Possible, it %vithin 4 feet ofhas the garagethi. Mr.orteMaddition ns told ther the Board thatZ' fie plants to remove
his still existing garage and replace it with one placed further back on his property,
the liced for the variation. However, his plans to do this are for some time In the
next 12 months.
Vdage Staff Presented their position that the size of room addition and dimensiorls ,Ire
'eIsOnaNe for uanis pr()perty, The major reason for this Code requirement of ri lo ft)()z
separation is for fire safety. Neither the Fire Department nor inspection Services jjta%,e, Mjrj
Objection to this reqUeSt if certain conditions were rrict. Staff also made the statement that
a general cleanup of the property and the storage of a RV vehicle in the garage should be
condition of any approval.
The Zoning Board discussed the issue and felt the separation variation to be a reasonable
one, however, they asked Mr. Martens to either remove the garage within 12 moriths or put
ill fire rated at that time. The second condition, also made part of the approv;jl,
Was to cle m Up the back yard and store the recreational vehicles in the garage, Mr,
Z7 Z�
Martens reeLito these conditions. 17he Board then voted 4-0 to approve rile 4 foot
SelMrz'ti0n De,WetM the garage and the new room addition. There were no Objectors
present to voice their concerns at this hearing.
Approved:
F),—iv—,d M. Clements, —Director
� ; }
\ \� :
) � � �
. \
) . ;\
( � }
� � V
�
� ( .
: , }.a»mak
, � 4w
; Gf} � #
� �+
_ _� � .
} ��
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING 07 THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 65-v-89
PETITIONER:
PUBLICATION DATE:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Hearing Date: October 5, 1989
Steven Martens
September 19, 1989
214 N. School
REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.102.B.1
to construct a room addition that will
be 4 feet from the existing
detached garage.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Len Petrucelli
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
None
Mr. Steven Martens, 214 North School Street, Petitioner, stated that
he would like to build an addition off the back of his house to
accommodate an expanding family. There will be 4 feet between the
garage and the house. It was noted that he anticipates relocating the
garage to the back southeast corner within the next 12 months. Mr.
Martens would agree to the drywall in the garage as recommended by
Inspection Services. A contractor will construct the shell of the
addition and Mr. Martens would complete the interior. All property
maintenance and storage of recreational vehicles will be completed as
requested.
Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that the applicant is
proposing a 500 square foot addition rirovldin- two bedrooms and a
family room at the rear of the house.' Normally a 10 foot separation
is required, but due to the garage location, there will be only 4 feet
between the garage and the addition. The addition is proposed to be
located at the north end of the house as far from the garage as
Possible. Staff recommends conditioning approval of this request
provided Mr. Martens does the required property maintenance and sees
to the storage of recreational vehicles.
Chairman Basnik suggested to Mr. Martens that the Board condition the
approval allowing for the garage to be relocated within 12 months or
the 5/8,, Calss X drywall be installed. Mr. Martens agreed.
ZBA 65-V-89
Page Two
Upon motion by Mr. Brettrager, seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved
to grant a variation from Section 14.102.B.1 to construct a room
addition that will be 4 feet from the existing detached garage as
shown on Petitionerfs Exhibit #3, providing the Petitioner agrees
within 12 montlis to either remove the garage or provide the existing
garage with drywall sufficient to satisfy the Fire Department's Code.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Basnik, Brettrager
Nayes: None
By a vote of 4-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be
required for this request.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
V.tx,IAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL.-
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER / ' PeJFC1
SUBJECT: ZBA-65-V-89, STEVEN MARTENS
LOCATION: 214 NORTH SCHOOL STREET
DATE: SEPTEMBER 27, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.13.1 to construct a room addition
that will be located 4 feet from an existing detached garage. Code normally requires a 10
foot separation.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Inspection Services Department recommends that 5/8" Class X drywall be installed in the
existing garage. Permits will be required prior to any construction, No other comments or
objections were received.
PIANNANC
I AND ZONINGCOMMENTS
Mr. Martens resides in a 900 square foot home in a neighborhood typically made up of
-smaller hornes on average sized lots. This property is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential,
The applicant is proposing a 500 square foot addition providing two bedrooms and a family
room at the rear of the home. There is an existing two -car detached garage approximately'
20 feet away from the back of the house and less than 3 feet away from the property line.
Because of the location of this garage, the proposed room addition will be located only 4
feet from the nearest garage wall, necessitating the variation from the 10 foot separation
requirement.
The room addition is proposed to be located at the north end of the house, as far from the
garage as possible. As you can see from the existing floor plan, the bathroom and bedroom
in the existing home would not permit entrance into the new addition without major
renovations. The width of the proposed addition could either be shifted further north
extending past the north building line or could be reduced by 6 feet in order to meet the
Code requirement. Mr. Martens should address why the dimensions of the proposed room
addition cannot be reduced or why the room addition cannot be shifted further north.
Gil Basnik - Page
ZBA-65-V-89
September 27, 1989
The major reason for the Code requirement of a 10 foot separation is for ire safety.
Neither the Fire Department nor Inspection Services have an objection to this request, if
approval is conditioned upon the requirement of the installation of fire -rated drywall in the
garage. Planing and Zoning concurs with the opinion. no adverse impact upon the
neighborhood is expected as a result of this variation,
Upon a field inspection of the property„ we noted that some property maintenance is
warranted, including the removal of the recreational trailer from the driveway. It would be
allowed in the garage. Discussion with Mr. Martens indicates that he plans to relocate the
detached garage further back on his property, thereby meeting the 10 foot separation
between structures If Mr. Martens does this in the near future„ it will be beneficial. We
would recommend conditioning any approval of this variation upon the agreement by Mr.
i%lartens that he clean up the area around the garage, including the relocation of the trailer.
In summary, the applicant must establish a need for the size and dimensions as proposed
for the room addition. The Village has no objection to the proposal from a fire safety
standpoint if the above mentioned conditions are made part of the approval. Furthermore,
we would recommend that property maintenance and storage of recreational vehicles in the
garage be required.
PB:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
DATE: SEPTEMBER 21, 1989
SUBJECT: PATE'S RESUBDIVISION
1000 CARDINAL LANE TO WILDWOOD LANE
INCLUDING DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATIONS FOR
SIDEWALK, LOT DEPTH, PARKWAY TREES, LENGTH OF
CUL-DE-SAC AND PAVEMENT WIDTH
The applicant is requesting that the current two -lot site be resubdivided into seven lots of
record. The site is currently vacant, with the exception of a residence on the proposed Lot
4. The subject site is zoned R-1, Single Family Residential, and is surrounded by single
family residences, with the exception of the north side, which borders the 1-1 zoned
Kensington Center for Business area.
The Plan Commiss',)n c,)rsidered the above mentioned resubdivision and Development
Code modifications during their regular meeting on Wednesday, September 20. The first
item voted on was the request to eliminate sidewalks on the Wildwood Lane cul-de-sac bulb
in Lot 1. The Plan Commission voted four in favor and three against this item. The item
failed for a lack of a fifth vote. The Commissioners who voted against this item stated the
sidewalks are needed to improve safety for children in the area. Staff had no objections
to the applicant's request because the five proposed homes on the cul-de-sac bulk, and total
of a possible nine homes on Wildwood Lane would not create an unsafe situation on the
bulb.
The second Development Code modification requested was to permit Lots 2, 3, 6 and 7 to
be less than 120 feet in depth. All seven lots have more than the required 8,125 square feet
of area per lot and are of adequate size and configuration for the placement of a single
family home. The Plan Commission voted 7-0 in favor of recommending approval of this
item. Staff had no objections to this item.
The applicant's third Development Code request was to permit the required parkway trees
to be planted on private property on the Wildwood Lane cul-de-sac, The applicant is
willing to meet all other requirements for these trees, including the 40 foot spacing. The
Plan Commission voted 6-1 in favor of recommending approval of this item. The single
negative vote was from Mr. Borrelli who stated he was concerned that the trees would not
receive proper maintenance if placed on private property. Staff had no objections to the
applicant's request.
John F. Dixon - Page 2
September 21, 1989
The fourth and final Development Code request was to permit a pavement width of 27 feet
on the stem of Wildwood Lane. This narrower pavement width would permit other
Development Code requirements, ie, parkway trees and sidewalks, to be installed on the
south side of the 40 foot road right-of-way. The Plan Commission voted 7-0 in favor of
recommending approval for a 27 foot back to back pavement width on Wildwood Lane.
Staff had no objections.
The final item considered regarding this development was the Pate's Resubdivision Plat.
The Plan Commission voted 4-3 in favor of the resubdivision. The vote failed for a lack
of a fifth yes vote. Staff had no objectives to the approval of the resubdivision.
It should be noted that seven residents of the area attended the Plan Commission meeting.
They stated they were opposed to this development primarily because the five single family
lots proposed for the cul-de-sac on Wildwood Lane would gain access from Westwood via
Wildwood Lane which currently has a pavement width of 14 feet. They felt that these
additional five homes would create too much traffic on this narrow street.
MES: hg
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director
IN
E
g
u TM1
N W
I
2ZI
11C SCALE 1N FEET
m
J
3
W ")
M
Y
O
5
W
a R-1 Zoning District
jj Front Yard - 30-0
SideYard - 10% or 10'-0, whichever in lees
RFar Yard - 25-0
= Floor Area Ratio - ,35
I
SII E�yEM1r1{
I ' ,r- `IRON PIPE
NERETOFOAE DEO I'CAiEO iFOR PUBLIC 6TREET
CARDINAL LANE
MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT
SAFETY COMMISSION
October 2, 1989
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety
Commission was called to order at 7:30 P.M.
II ROLL CALL
Present upon Roll Call: Lee Beening, Chairman
Andy Mitchell, V -Chairman
Art Coy, Commissioner
John Metzenthin, Commissioner
Dan Ackerman, Fire Dept.
Steve Leonard, Police Dept.
Drew Johanson, Eng.
Absent: Art Coy, Commissioner
Also present, were 2 residents in the audience.
III APPROVAL OF MINUTES
commissioner Mitchell, seconded by John Metzenthin, moved
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the
Safety Commission held September 11, 1989.
MOti— Pi -sed Unanimously
IV OLD BUSINESS
A.) At the September 11, 1989, Safety Commission
Meeting, Chairman Beening requested a petition from
homeowner on Ivy In. regarding Mr. Panek's, 1912 Ivy
Ln., proposed turning restriction, Mr. Panek
submitted two petitions to the Commission. The
first to prohibit left turns onto eastbound Ivy Ln.
from southbound Burning Bush Ln., Monday through
Friday from 7 AM to 9 AM was signed by 30 of the 38
homeowner affected.
Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Dan Ackerman
moved to recommend concurring with the left turn
restrictions.
Motion Passed Unanimously
The second petition was to prohibit right turns from
the intersection Ivy Ln. & Moki Ln. Monday through
Friday from 4 PM to 6 PM was signed by 26 of the 38
homeowners affected.
It was the Commission's opinion this restriction
would only move the traffic to other streets south
Safety Commission Meeting - September 11, 1989
Page 2
October 11, 1989
of Ivy In. in the'' subdivision. Commissioner
Metzenthin stated restricting left turns from River
Rd. onto ivy In. would produce the same protection
for Ivy Ln. and not move additional traffic onto the
adjacent side streets.
Commissioner Mitchell, seconded by Commissioner
;Metzinthin moved to recommend prohibiting ,left turns
from northbound River Road onto westbound Ivy Ln.,
Monday through Friday, 4 PM to 6 PX.
Motion Passed Unanimously
B.) The request from the KensingtonBusiness Associa-
tion, for -a 4-WAY STOP at Business Center Dr. and
Feehanville Dr. was tabled at the September 11, 1989
Meeting so traffic counts could' be taken. After
reviewing the traffic volumes and; accident history
and considering the volumes will increase as the
industrial park continues to develop, it is the
Commissions opinion the 4-WAY STOP is warranted.
Commissioner Mitchell, seconded, by Steve Leonard
moved to recommend the installation of 4-WAY STOPS
at both intersections of Business Center Dr. &
Feehanville Dr.
Motion Passed: Unanimously
V. ADJOURNMENT
Having; no further business the Meeting was adjourned
at 9:30 PM.
Respectfully submitted,
Drew G. Johanson
DGJ/m
a
w
w.
-- 45 -Al 46-M
* - 54
s.
At
YCIA
p 0O o 0101
#iAol
.,,, �6/ )%euro (t� �;?D,»�
J.{ •o„ O '�""' �J A7 ,fy'y1.{
/R,M1 Gr V.o s' to:01j1r�:--
,. S °' r� rd's -off - _ 3
ao
9(iio ; K711 r�..
R.
Do~
\Cq1{ ;1_Y ;1' iC1lt 1106 j ��
a p IF w 14b '' \ �Iw,, r1 - 3 loo" 1003 ,
10 is axC1 xr a , �► w': :.
-<• \ _ + 1666; 1001•
CAI
705
1
.� w
6Ck
Y
00,.,.
ou
`., _ +4a � Dcr � '^�., ,• � . �' � 1 \ pfd" r,�, c 'ro r C> C7 a� "�
c� = -�, ,
a�rz,PL F_:.,
.�
�' S `'°' ."," 1 ■ "�.p". ct�• "'7� tl i p°,1 a
'a� y y 19novo 2608
+�/✓A-Irv' / (/f4 '~ «
. �.. _M._._._.
'gp3PFCT VICLAGE L/.Hlt3' A WT �'"'µ PRp3AfCT Y2Cf.G, LrNr73 ''x -• µn
.
_
Ail
Q,,,
At
YCIA
p 0O o 0101
#iAol
.,,, �6/ )%euro (t� �;?D,»�
J.{ •o„ O '�""' �J A7 ,fy'y1.{
/R,M1 Gr V.o s' to:01j1r�:--
,. S °' r� rd's -off - _ 3
ao
9(iio ; K711 r�..
R.
Do~
\Cq1{ ;1_Y ;1' iC1lt 1106 j ��
a p IF w 14b '' \ �Iw,, r1 - 3 loo" 1003 ,
10 is axC1 xr a , �► w': :.
-<• \ _ + 1666; 1001•
CAI
705
1
.� w
6Ck
Y
00,.,.
ou
`., _ +4a � Dcr � '^�., ,• � . �' � 1 \ pfd" r,�, c 'ro r C> C7 a� "�
c� = -�, ,
a�rz,PL F_:.,
.�
�' S `'°' ."," 1 ■ "�.p". ct�• "'7� tl i p°,1 a
'a� y y 19novo 2608
+�/✓A-Irv' / (/f4 '~ «
. �.. _M._._._.
'gp3PFCT VICLAGE L/.Hlt3' A WT �'"'µ PRp3AfCT Y2Cf.G, LrNr73 ''x -• µn
ALSCCIS JT. V NT.
4&3161 X4 TEt7J
419Ca1 if. VENT.
OKI UAOUTAFTFR3
0""Ja . 90/0NN0 '
E CTL )
M R. vgwv.
LAK MAIM
4 o a
w,
LEGEND
ONNER
(TE M1Nr} i 9}
r-200'
�N$1N N ROAD _
3 � ONS OPUS
C.D. SEARLE ( JQHN HANCOCR JOHN HANCOCK GRACO + LEDERLE OPUS + `
tw T5U8i5ND
j� 11300 t
to,N W.LEitma RD ADO BIERNANIV COURT TJ19 BIERNANM j }000 RUSINFSS I+CD BUSINESS 1200 FU7rN£35 OUSINE 7S aOSINES5
LOT
ZOO COURT CENTER DRIVE CENTCR OR1Vf CCNTER oRrvf ; CENTER CENTER ORIV !
i LOT Sot 1 e i D..' €E
Lor JO Lor lof s Lai dor LOT -02 �'.14110
ra�oJ
i
OPUS
JO
NANCoCN i -- i ONIttl S atNE53
(MnsuSISNO t£ENTH) (SEARLE e _I JOHN HANCOCx .- t
T�,, ,. (EASTMAN [ENifR YRtYE
69B N. —EELINO $To. I OPUS - <MRSUBISNI} 8U51NE55 CENTIR DAt VE
xODAK) l
(JOSTEN LEARNING` LOT tot
LOT tot SYSTEMS), g goo BUSINESS OPUS 1 IJlI @USINEJS •1
CENTER DRIVE OPUS CENTER ORtVE} -
000 •US1NF5a 627 SLAWIN- ;� (GTE} it
Md2d CENTER DRIVE d LOT z03 0" COURT l LOT 407 -
CORP. 100 + TS LOT 302-8 I##t BUStNE SS < S OPUS
600 R g"' LOT 20d CENTER DRIVE
i L /
RD
(LING ALSCOR JT. VEMT, tE I. JO1A JOt,- OPU3 € t0* 106 ,..�
'
I
bot
10710-9- z fpo BuslNrsa g}
U.S. AYADA .J CENTLR pRtvf - SUMIDEN� S03 SIAwrH
CAR@x}E _ COUfT j
1790 N 9HCLt+ for to? "1 "0 SOME 'i - MAK&TA USA ON9
N .01yE CrA, DRIVE \ a _ OPUS LOQ 312-C ..�� � :�
tar rOt
4,0
! W 9 M[Sf
tO.L. SASLOW)
[[MT[A
ORrvE
Iso ausiNr9a
!SS
. CENT[R DRIVE
6U31VEas
L Or 103
CENYrR
\`l
LOT ti0
DR VE
D
Lar 1 oB
710ON4
2
_00
t BUSIN[!B
U
'
CENTER ORIW
LOT tO[
N
4F9
{y
Z
wERYe:s
DRIVE
IIFSETIC3(
.�FROO(1CTB
�
LOT WOB
L3T #OT
dot 0U5+NES
CENTERDRIVE ON3
7 zoo tW�i frNA NCIAt
051 F£f++dNV1L1
�_ DRIVE
OPUS LOT 30!
(GESTETWID
Lor 311 t i
OPi14
B71 F£fNANVtLL£
S !RIVE
44444 LOT 310-C
C111140109 ALLISON
0#1 FrfHdNVILL£ DRIVE
LOT 310-8
f 1
700 544WLN
COURT
LOT 3az-D
OPUS
6.LU17E.
i' ONS ,Ir70 FrE..NI
tBUSiN£SS 4ERv}GES}< DRIVE
LOT 307
90# i[FHANVtttE
pRivf
LOT 307
- PRIER
4,0
! W 9 M[Sf
V•Tf RNATONA(. MARKETING
[[MT[A
ORrvE
root IOBI
a0f qt
F££HAtr✓ILLE DRIVE
IM BYBtN[SB
LOT 30fA' LOT 3oa a
I
C[NTjR ORIVt
\`l
LOT ti0
L3T #OT
dot 0U5+NES
CENTERDRIVE ON3
7 zoo tW�i frNA NCIAt
051 F£f++dNV1L1
�_ DRIVE
OPUS LOT 30!
(GESTETWID
Lor 311 t i
OPi14
B71 F£fNANVtLL£
S !RIVE
44444 LOT 310-C
C111140109 ALLISON
0#1 FrfHdNVILL£ DRIVE
LOT 310-8
f 1
700 544WLN
COURT
LOT 3az-D
OPUS
6.LU17E.
i' ONS ,Ir70 FrE..NI
tBUSiN£SS 4ERv}GES}< DRIVE
LOT 307
90# i[FHANVtttE
pRivf
LOT 307
- PRIER
LEE'S I ROSCOR
V•Tf RNATONA(. MARKETING
903
root IOBI
FEEN—V%. E r
DRIW
F££HAtr✓ILLE DRIVE
LOT 310-A
I
LOT 30fA' LOT 3oa a
I
TOPIC AMEPICA
1z70
NV4 rFfw
a
LOT J03
OPUS €F[[HdxvutE?
DR1vr
1101 FEENANvt.l[ 4 Lor 304 `
DRIVE
Lor 304 � ]
r4JV fE rl tF
` pRIIEIVf � LOT 607
OT 413 l
7/ I 111 6%
t
oPUS
1BTORY OFfgMT 1
2[NITM} 1
1461 FEE MV11 £
DR+v
tQr SUr
V�.LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC i
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
DATE: OCTOBER 6, 1989
SUBJECT: PROSPECT AVENUE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS AND CONCRETE
PAVERS CONTRACT
CHANGE ORDER #1
Attached you will find a change order for the above referenced project that will permit the
Village to centralize electrical service in and around the project area as well eliminate
overhead wiring. The control panel mentioned in the change order will be located on the
north side of Prospect Avenue and will serve the train station, Chicago and Northwestern
track signals, the newly installed pedestrian lights on Prospect Avenue, and the traffic
signals at Main and Prospect. The electrical panel will also complete the Village's program
of removal of overhead wiring on this block of Prospect Avenue.
The Village's electrical consultant for this project, Neil Eash and Associates, has reviewed
this change order and finds that the work described will complete the contract and that the
contractor's price is reasonable. He has also advised us that the contractor, Peddle Electric,
will not be permitted to connect the traffic signals or Chicago and Northwestern track
signals to this panel. Separate contracts, to Aldridge Electric and Metra, will be needed
to complete these installations at a combined estimated cost of no more than $4,000.00.
Staff has likewise reviewed the attached change order and would recommend approval of
it. Funding for this change order will be from the Village's Community Development Block
Grant, Account No. 23-062-13-8951 and 23-062-13-8952. The combined balance in these
two accounts is $10,928.00. Adjacent property owners' participation in this project, in the
amount of $6,609.32, will also be used to cover the cost of this change order.
MMI
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director
CRAWIt .01001 M I
(Air -Lot AgeoptamosIn '�0461-314)
LOCATIM Prospect Ave., Main to Emerson
OW1031: Village of Mount Prospect_
10: Contraetor _ Larry Peddle Electric
Application No.CD-89-04
You are hereby directed,* GubJcct to PrOvislons of the Contract, to make
the rolloviet changes:
Item 664017 Control Center $2,475.00
Electric work (control panel) for Prospect Avenue pedestrian lights to provide a complete,
operational system.
1. (1) Control panel $1,875.00
2. Control cabinet contactor, wirifig-pboto. cell and timer $7,500.00
1 Conc--te rad
$2J50.00
4. Wiring, piping, and trenching to junction box, including
restoration
CHANGE ORDER #1 TOTAL $11335M
NOTE: Permit will be required but will be issued free of charge.
QUALIFICATION: No services or materials are included other than those stated in this proposal.
All work shall be completed by November 15, 19&9, or 5 days after Commonwealth Edison
connects the electric service, whichever is later. Add three -(3) days for each rain day.
A service charge of 1 1/2% per month will be charged on unpaid balances in excess of 30 days
after Village Inspector's final approval.
AGRM) to VI:
original Contract Price $59,801.50 1 Ovaer ' Date
Prior Mangi Orden $ 0 Contractor Date
ibis Change Order $ llr335. 00 villaw r Date
Revised Contract Price$ 71,136.50
Prepared
16 Mount '#-eospect Public Works 00'0 , artment
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM n= CrrV USA
TO: Village manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: October 11, 1989
SUBJECT: consultant for Study of
Million Gallon Elevated Tank
Approximately two weeks ago, I sent requests for proposals to
three consulting firms covering engineering inspection of our
elevated tank. Proposals received are thus:
Tank Industry Consultants, Inc. $ 4,925
RJN Environmental Associates, Inc. $18,000
Strand Associates, Inc. no quote
The Finance director and I reviewed the original request for
proposal submittal and we feel that it encompasses all areas in
question which concern the Finance Commission and the Village
Board- I recommend acceptance of the quote as submitted by Tank
Industry Consultants, Inc. for $4925. 1 feel that they thorough-
ly understand the scope of the project and should be able to
furnish us a detailed report.
HLW/td attach. (RFP)
Director
�ierberc L Weeks
Deputy Director
Glen R Andlll
Water supoli.t*r4t auk
Jerry
W Vl ntow
rt
t
Sere Suptri.toftcl
Melvyn L BothU 1J
Fn ... try Superintendent Y
Sandra M Clark
Ad ministrutive Aid. U
M Lisa Angell Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1 700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 600E56
TREE Crff USA
Phone 31 2/670-5640
Request for Proposals
September 26, 1989
The Village of Mount Prospect is seeking proposals from selected
consultants to provide professional services to assist the Vil-
lage in analyzing and determining the future utility of its
one million -gallon elevated water storage tank. This specific
structure is receiving public scrutiny in the media, by elected
officials, and by some of the Village's advisory boards and
commissions. The consultant's final report, comments and recom-
mendations will be discussed publicly through a process of thor-
ough review and examination. The consultant will exercise abso-
lute professional standards and objectivity in their examination
and final report.
This one million -gallon elevated tank, located on land bordered
by Northwest Highway, Evergreen, and Maple Street, was built by
Chicago Bridge and Iron in 1955. Approximate height of the one
million -gallon structure is 1321. In 1982, the tank was sand-
blasted and painted inside and out, presumably using paint with-
out any lead base. After blasting, and on the recommendation of
the painting contractor, several pitted areas on the interior of
the tank were filled with weld. Prior to 1985, this community
pumped all of its water from deep wells, and the raw water con-
tained substantial mineral content. The only treatment given
was the addition of chlorine for bacteria control. Since early
1986, 100% of our water supply has been purchased from the City
of Chicago, which draws its supply from Lake Michigan. Water
quality reports indicate significant changes in mineral content
between the raw product to the delivered product.
Problem statement
Prior consultant reports have addressed the continuing need for
this elevated tank considering the new supply points. Their
reports indicated that, for operation of the system, the use of
an elevated tank was preferable to a closed system. This issue
was debated, and the majority consensus was to continue operat-
ing the system with an elevated tank. However, some concern has
been expressed over the future costs of maintaining this one
Million -gallon elevated tank and its expected useful life. Some
of the current issues concerning this tank are as follows:
The close proximity to recently constructed luxury townhous-
es.
2. The age of the tank and its expected useful life.
3. Details on the structural integrity of the tank including a
comprehensive analysis of any deterioration of the metal.
4. The environmental impact of maintaining the tank in its
present location.
5. Is the tank in need of a new coating; and if so, recommend-
ed procedures and projected costs.
6. The expected maintenance schedule over the useful life of
the tank.
7. Based upon the condition of the tank and the Potential cost
of future maintenance, are there any circumstances under
which a sound recommendation could be made for replacing
the tank.
The mayor and board of trustees have authorized engaging a pro-
fessional, independent consulting firm to make a report avail-
able which addresses the above issues and which will aid them in
their decision regarding the future of this tank.
Project Scope
The consultant will provide professional analysis which will
assist the mayor and board of trustees in assessing issues enu-
merated in the problem statement and add any relevant informa-
tion which may aid them in making a decision regarding the
tank. They are to properly evaluate the issues and furnish
necessary and sufficient cost/benefit analyses relative to their
recommendation.
At a minimum, the consultant shall:
1. Address the issues enumerated in the problem statement.
2• Incorporate in their final analysis all points addressed in
the American Water Works Standard D101-53(RI979) for in-
specting and repairing steel water tanks, stand pipes,
reservoirs and elevated tanks, for water storage (copy
attached).
3. Supply estimated costs for constructing a new tank of same
capacity . and the expected maintenance costs of a new tank.
Mount Prospect, Illinois Public Works Department
4. Supply estimated cost of demolition of the existing tank,
and determine salvage value, if any.
5. Determine need and projected costs for any repairs or modi-
fications to existing walkways, ladders, rods, etc., which
are deemed unsafe, broken, deteriorated or need to be
changed to conform to current state and federal agency
regulations. Also advise nature and projected cost of any
new safety devices required by law which are currently not
in place.
6. Evaluate the cathodic protection system on the tank and
report on its adequacy. If the system is found to be inade-
quate, make recommendations and supply projected costs.
7. Report on operational improvements, if any, that would be
gained if a new tank is recommended.
8. Furnish recommendation and projected cost on type of coat-
ing to be considered.
9. Provide an opinion on whether or not sand blasting should
be done prior to any recoating, and determine additional
cost, if any, including screening.
10. Include washing out interior of the tank, all necessary
rigging or safety equipment, all manpower required to as-
sist the inspector(s), and any illumination equipment that
might needed. we need 36 hours advance notice to empty the
tank for your inspection.
11. Include cleaning and rechlorination upon completion of
inspection. AWWA Standard C652-86, method three is an
acceptable guideline for rechlorination.
12. Complete inspection work within 21 days after notice of
award and complete final report within 21 days upon comple-
tion of inspection.
13. Prepare necessary comparisons between or among the issues,
options and alternatives, including continuing maintenance
costs, and translate that data into understandable
cost/benefit ratios.
14. Prepare no less than 12 copies of the final report and
recommendation, including all documentation or original
photographs leading to that recommendation.
The consultant's work should produce an end product of suffi-
cient quality and clarity to assure the mayor and board of trust-
ees that the consultant's recommended course of action has been
thoroughly examined, documented and justified and is, in fact,
the best foreseeable solution.
Mount Prospect, Illinois Public Works Department
Proposals should be addressed to Herbert L. Weeks, Director of
Public Works, 1700 West Central Road, Mount Prospect, IL 60056.
Closing date for receipt of proposals for this study to be no
later than 10:00 Am, October 5, 1989.
HLW/td
attach.
Very truly yours,
1. 4��l el Lt)xt&
Herbert L. weeks
Director Public Works
Mount Prospect, Illinois Public Works Department
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING JURISDICTION OF
OF CAMP MC DONALD ROAD BETWEEN
WOLF ROAD AND RIVER ROAD
WHEREAS, the Cook County Highway Department is desirous of
transferring the jurisdiction of Camp Mc Donald Road between Wolf
and River Roads to the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, that portion of Camp Mc Donald Road located between Wolf
Road and River Road is located within the corporate boundaries of
the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect do hereby accept the jurisdiction of Camp Mc Donald
Road between Wolf and River Roads, as specified in Addendum #1
attached hereby and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize execution of an
Addendum Agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and the
Cook County Department of Highways, a copy of said Addendum #1 is
attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which Addendum accepts the
jurisdiction of Camp Mc Donald Road between Wolf and River Roads
from the Cook County Department of Highways.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk is hereby directed to forward
a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Cook County Department
of Highways.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1989.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
COUNTY OF COOK
DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAYS
GEORGE W DUNNE. P1.5Id*.f
9—d of County C.rnni**.rA
October 10, 1989
Village of wheeling
255 West Dxxlee pond
P 0 Box V
Wheeling, Illinois 60090
Attn Village president
COUNTY BUILDING
118 NORTH CLARK STREET
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60602
OFFICE of the SUPERINTENDENT
MARCO OOMICO Ch-
Committee on Road, and 8,,d,,
Village of mount Prospect
100 South Mmrson Street
Mmult Prospect, Illinois 60056
Attn Mayor
City of Prospect Heic
.jhts
4 East CaMP MCDonald Po,,:d
Prospect fL-iqhts,
Re CanP McDonald Road
Rand FloadDesPlaineS Fdimr Road
Improvement, Transfer of Jurisdiction
and Maintenance to Three Municipalities
Agreement
Enclosed for execution and information are copies of the captioned agreement
as follows: Six copies to wheeling for execution,
other three In.Inicipalities for advance information. one copy to each of the
agreement is se The substance of the
t forth in the first page and AddendLn #1, having been extensively
discussed and corresponded -about among the County and municipalities.
Wheeling is asked to execute first, because of its limited involvenent, and
forward the six copies to the City of Prospect Heights. That City is to
execute and forward all six to the Village of Mount Prospect. Mount Prospect
should Process and send the six to Arlington Heights, which, after
the six, should return them to the County. E>rpeditious handling processing
is reCommerfded so that the CbuntY can begin the work at �m of the agreement
early date. 7he
County will execute and send all six to the Illinois Department of Transportation
for approval signatures on each. IDOT is asked to return one original document
to the four municipalities and to the flobunty, retaining one for record.
1rus . k Zf
ilh�'
4tV.
Superintendent of Highways
Cook County, Illinois
CbPY- IDOT Schaumburg, Attn Omar Nashif
MM71 ^II M
CDuntY of Mok, the Village of Wheeling, the
City of ftORW-t Heights, the Village
of w #
* the
#w i
CountyRiver a3ada and subsequently transferring
for iMxOv3.ng Camp W*x-Ald Road between Avid and ces plaines
* ** #: #
• aforesaid municipaUties
I- The
L'Vrovsnent, by Q• !# cost(except for new sidewalks anvor
consiststreet "Oting),slall of
Dale Avenue, tWO lane cross section from We Avenue to Des Plain" Riv,._r R)ad;
intersection channelization as deteminod from
of the dr&L-*9e structure at design study,#
M*# 4Creak,• 3092, presently
bridges
oauntv Will:
4. L030 V100iPt of .v## • of
# '• • KKAIC Prospect,
PZDSPSCt Heights, and Wheeling, based on previvasly approved Preliminary
PLUIS,
adlmrtise, let* award, Construct and SUParviSe cawtzu.-tion,
Ply for I Cost of the improvement
sidewalk) w street lighting;
# x.
b- C -"ordinate all matters
requiring
# .., w # A y Phases, y #
to bring0 the County#;:.attention,A to Participate
4
C.Aazuire
for improvement,,
w *#
Heights # Prospect
• M,,,,• prospect,
of Mveling over part,of subsequent
of
•• Ofthe inProvement,listed
transfer mainberanoe of said zoad'to,each municipality accepting jurisdiction
within the jurisdictional
3. The Villages of W-eeling, Arlington Heights, Motmt prospect and the City of
Prospect Heights will each
a. Pronptly review plans submitted.by
to avoid unnecessary delay,
b. With respect to the
corporate
• •w Of
construction' installation
• operatingcostsfort1l-
any
new
'si
street lighting desired'by that municioality to dewalk and/]
PaYMents
or
#: ..#4w. y ,. ck be included in the proj
•.. . # •
Co�btL the y •• y
to the Superintendent of Hig,,,-r Fuel Tax nInd unt 600-570, and sent
M; payments are to be r
days of date
of a statenrMt frcm
and/or lighting •
m fc
inal inspection.
AOCENDEN #1 smunow Eve 2
4. The City of ft*Wwt ft4ft will
a- PIMS tie N. •AddoloVdIUM hereto, Mclaring, intent. to
accepJurisdiction over Camp McConald Road from Dale Manua; to tie West Opt
right Of UNY line of MUM -Lane 13d.1codbg
*
of The w. • M• acceptance •ing w;.r #3092)1
said ordinance to be passed with executing this agreement;
b. Accept the jurisdictilin at the future date indicated in item 4a;
c- Assume maintenance of Camp McConald Road from Band Road to the weasot
AN of way line of ww
notice •x•w r
to do 00 Mlowing acceptance ty Prospect %4%r and its Carl, h=mIm
inspection of the completed improvement, including Structure #3092;
d. Recognize the term
of any ax •. * `...w•
the exercise of the aforesaid Jurisdiction and maintenanc6 over, MWMIWV
ADCENaN #1 S71PLMATICNS Page 3
7* 7he Village of Wheelingby executing this agreement, will thm co'
to maintenance and assurPtIOn Of jurisdiction of Camp McDonald Rvd,
north half , frcrn McDonald Creek to Wif , R�ad by the ri ty of pros�
Heights, the latter in the course of obligations to be asswed by it
herein. The Village shall attach authorizing minutes for execution.
on.
8. This agreement shall be processed in six original copies, one being for
the Illinois DePartMent Of Transportation. When effective, it shall
bi-nd the parties hereto, their successors and assigns.
ELK GkovE TWP., PAGE 9 MAINE TWP., PAGE 20
c
Part Of l4iEFJlNG
TOWNSHIP
0
a, palallile R
Rd
1-1
I
Carne McNnald Rd
Kensingloll Rd
Addendun #2
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3918 AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF
A SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF WOLF ROAD
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
through the adoption of Ordinance No. 3918, have entered into an
Agreement with the Illinois Department of Transportation relative
to the improvement of Wolf Road; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the request of the Village of Mount Prospect,
the Illinois Department of Transportation has agreed to include
the installation of casing pipes for future water main connections
at specified areas at an estimated cost to the Village of Mount
Prospect of $11,000; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
have determined that it would be in the best interest of the
Village of Mount Prospect to enter into a Supplemental Agreement,
with the Illinois Department of Transportation to include said
improvements, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made
a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect do hereby authorize and direct the Village President to
execute and the Village Clerk to attest his signature on the
Supplemental Agreement between the Illinois Department of
Transportation and the Village of Mount Prospect, a copy of said
Supplemental Agreement is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", for
specified improvements to be included in the improvement of Wolf
Road, the cost of said improvements shall be the responsibility of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That pursuant to the Supplemental Agreement being the
subject of this Ordinance, the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby state that funds necessary
for this additional improvement will be appropriated therefor.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by
law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
0-111
, 1989.
4\\
0 American Wal r
e V.6rksAssoaalton
AWWA DIOI-53 (R1979)
AWWA STANDARD
for
INSPECTING AND REPAIRING STEEL
WATER TANKS, STANDPIPES, RESERVOIRS,
AND ELEVATED TANKS, FOR
WATER STORAGE
.,J Rrafirrnrd midmnt rrvision Feb. 3. 1979.
t
Approvrd as Tentative by
New England Water Works Association, Sept. 14, 1948
American WaterNorks Association, Sept. 20, 1948
American Welding Society, Dec. 2, 1948
Revision approved:
AWWA, May 9, 1952
AWS, June 12, 1952
NEWWA, March 20, 1952
Approved as Standard by:
AWWA, May 15, 1953
AMERICAN WATER WORKS ASSOCIATION
8666 West Quincy Avenue, Denver, Colorado 80235
Committee Personnel
The Standards Committee on Steel Elevated Tanks, Standpipes & Reservoirs
that reviewed and reaffirmed this standard without revision had the following
personnel at that tithe!
R. E. VANSANT, Chairman
Consenter Members
DAVIS, R. D., American Water Works Service Company,
Haddon Heights, NJ (AWWA)
Hout,i;IAX, J, W., East Bay Municipal Utility District,
Oakland, CA (AWWA)
LA MONTE, A. V., JR., Department of Water & Power,
Los Angeles, CA (AWWA)
General Interest Members
'=KNAM, P. C„ JR., Whitman & Howard, Inc., Wellesley, MA (NEWWA)
l n xtti, W, T., Factory Mutual Research, Norwood, MA (AWWA)
CnEYER, T. F.. Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc., Boston, MA (NEWWA)
MIWFNIA, H, J,. Robert Bein, William Frost & Associates,
Newport Beach, CA (AWWA)
PETERS, L. F„ Weston & Sampson Engineers, Boston, MA (NEWWA)
VANSANT, R. E., Black & Veatch, Kansas City, MO (AWWA)
WARD, N. C., CH2M Hill, Denver, CO (AWWA) -
WILLIAMS, J. A., Jordan, Jones & Goulding, Inc., Atlanta, GA (AWWA)
Producer Members
Cleanliness—Section A-4 ......,.... 9
Bt;ZFK, J. R., Brown -Minneapolis -Tank and Fabricating Company,
Repair—Part R
St. Paul, MN
(AWS)
CHRISTOFFERSON, D. W.,t Chicago Bridge & Iron Company,
Oak Brook, IL
Fucixi, A. R„ Pittsburgh -Des Moines Steel Company,
(AWS)
Pittsburgh, PA
PFoico, H. K., Universal Tank & Iron Works, Indianapolis, IN
(AWS)
(AWWA)
,N TAR, R. S., Chicago Bridge & Iron Company, Oak Brook, IL
(AWS)
1 Alternate
I.unlp Sunt Bids ................... 12
0 Copyright 1979 by the American water Wnrkr Asan,
Printed
I. US
11
Table of Contents
Inspection—Part A
General—Section A -t
Scole.................. ...........
lastectiml Service ..................
Responsibility ......................
Draining of Tank ..................
Work Included .....................
Examination and Report—Section A-2
Condition of Paint .................
Pitting ............................
"Pyle of Repairs ....................
Detailed Report of Inspector—Section
A-3
Items to Be Reported ..............
Disposition of Report ..............
Payment ...........................
The document has been prepared by a standing joint committee representing the
American Water Works Assn., the New England Water Works Assn. and the Ameri-
Affik can Welding Society.
IF 0
Latest Revision to D101
1-11e most recent chAnges in Standard D101 were approved oil May 11, 1932, by
AWWA; ou Jun- I2, 1952, by AWS; and on +far. 20, 1952, by NEWWA, Tlx
changes prittripally affect tic-. 11.2, resiling the terms for extra work, and Sec. B-6,
ou Cleanliness, In atldition, the entire -retion on painting (See, Cl has been reproved
anrl, in reviseit form, canstitmes a to ry silecification, D102, which is being printed
Ii.gethrr with this edition of [)tot.
The revisions have all been incorporated into the text of the eighth printing dated
Selnemtter I9S2, and later printings. The text of the seventh printing (November
1951) and earlier printings Illus becomes obsolete.
This printing contains all of the revisions and changes referred to above. It also
contains Initlor cilitorial changes made at the time of reaffirmation so that the re-
printed standard is consistent with otter current AWWA standards.
Cleanliness—Section A-4 ......,.... 9
Repair—Part R
General—Section B -I
5
5
Work to Be Done ................. 11
Inspection Recorded .......,.
0
\Work to Be itemized ............... if
I.unlp Sunt Bids ................... 12
6
6
Extra Work—Section B-2 12
6 f
Watertightness—Section B-,3 ........ 12
Responsibility—Section 13-4 .. _ . _ , .. 13
7
Inspection—Section B -S .. 13
.
8
Cleanliness—Section B-6 ............ 13
The document has been prepared by a standing joint committee representing the
American Water Works Assn., the New England Water Works Assn. and the Ameri-
Affik can Welding Society.
IF 0
Latest Revision to D101
1-11e most recent chAnges in Standard D101 were approved oil May 11, 1932, by
AWWA; ou Jun- I2, 1952, by AWS; and on +far. 20, 1952, by NEWWA, Tlx
changes prittripally affect tic-. 11.2, resiling the terms for extra work, and Sec. B-6,
ou Cleanliness, In atldition, the entire -retion on painting (See, Cl has been reproved
anrl, in reviseit form, canstitmes a to ry silecification, D102, which is being printed
Ii.gethrr with this edition of [)tot.
The revisions have all been incorporated into the text of the eighth printing dated
Selnemtter I9S2, and later printings. The text of the seventh printing (November
1951) and earlier printings Illus becomes obsolete.
This printing contains all of the revisions and changes referred to above. It also
contains Initlor cilitorial changes made at the time of reaffirmation so that the re-
printed standard is consistent with otter current AWWA standards.
� hrmrrt�4lbtn Nbr.c Asvx:alim
AWWA DIOI-53 fRI9791
AWWA Standard for
Inspecting and Repairing Steel Water Tanks,
Standpipes, Reservoirs, and Elevated
Tanks, for Water Storage
Introduction
This document has been prepared by
a joint committee of the American
Water Works Assn., the New England
Water Works Assn, and the Ameri-
can Welding Society. In developing
this document, covering the inspection
and repair of steel water storage tanks,
standpipes and reservoirs, the associ-
ations make available to their members
an outline of methods which, in the
opinion of their committees, may prop-
erly be followed.
The principles which the committees
feel that the tank * owner should fol-
low in repairing a water storage tank
are listed below. When the term
"owner" is used, it may be taken to
mean the person or corporation own-
ing the works; the manager or super-
intendent of the water department or
company; the water board or commis-
sion ; the city council; or the mayor;
that is, whoever is responsible for con -
* The word "tank" is used hereinafter
broadly in place of the lengthy phrase "steel
tanks. standpipes, reservoirs, or elevated
tanks. for water storage."
tracts made by and on behalf of the
water utility, whether publicly or pri-
vately owned.
1. The tank owner should employ a
disinterested inspector to look over the
metal surface inside and out, to de-
termine the condition of the paint and
interior metal surfaces. and what re-
pairs, if any, are needed. Tanks need
repainting frequently, but, if properly
maintained, repairs are rarely neces-
sa ry.
2. The owner should invite any tank
repair firm which he wishes to bid on
a job to inspect the tank at the same
time the inspector does, so that the
prospective contractors have full infor-
mation concerning the conditions.
3. The owner should have the tank
drained, cleaned and dry, ready for
inspection, on the announced date.
(Syr Part A, Sec. A-1.4.)
4. The owner should draw up his
own proposals for the work to be done
and request bids on the work. He
should have these proposals approved
by his attorney.
2 1NSPECTWG AND REPAIRING STEEL TANKS
S. The tank owner should not com-
bine proposals for repair work and
painting in one document. He should
always leave himself free to award
separate contracts if he desires.
6. The owner should not permit any
bidder to condition one part of the op-
erations upon another, part. For ex -
pie, the owner should not permit a
Painting contract to bear any condi-
tions, reservations or cancellations of
customary guarantees dependent upon
the same bidder receiving the contract
for repairs.
7. The owner should, however, in-
° 1e in his proposal a provision that,
he contracts for repairs arnd for
painting are granted to the same con-
tractor, the contractor shall record the
amount which he will deduct from the
sum of the two independent bids. (The
price for the combination job should be
less by the stated amount than the sum
of the same contractor's bids for sepa-
rate jobs.)
& The owner should compare all bids
received to see whether a separate bid
by onecontractor for repair and a
separate bid by another contractor for
painting total less than the adjusted
bid in 7 above. If the saving is ma-
terial and if both the contractors are
known to be reliable, separate con-
tracts should be let.
?. The owner, particularly if a mu -
pal department. should arrange for
public review of bids and for public
letting of contracts.
10. While the rise of the contractor's
contract forms is not recommended, if
the owner chooses to engage in letting
contracts for repair or contract forms
other than his own, he should first sub-
mit them to his attorney, asking him
to study them carefully to see:
a. that no unlimited unit price
commitments are included in the con-
tract form
b. that no commitments or guaran-
tees by the contractor are conditioned
upon any matters not clearly and spe-
cifically set forth in the contract;
c. that no obligations are incurred
by the owner which are not specifically
set forth in the contract; and
d, that a clause covering possible
extra work is included in the contract
form and is of the same general char-
acter and equally as specific as that in-
cluded in Sec. B-2 of Part B of this
document.
Referring to 10a above, it is clearly
in the interest of equitable business
practice that, if the owner and the con-
tractor agree to permit or authorize
the contractor to do some unscheduled
repair work incidental to painting, this
repair work should not be of such ex-
tent as to make the painting cost minor
by comparison. Again, upon the as-
sumption that a tank owner may choose
to disregard the recommendations for
prior inspection outlined above, lee can
properly. and should, stipulate that
the total of unscheduled repairs shall
not cost more than a given amount,
such as the total of the painting con-
tract.
Referring to 101) and 10c above, it is
observed that, if extended beyond one
year, guarantees of repair or painting
work clone involve uncertainties which
are not necessarily in the interest of
either the tank owner or the repair
or painting contractor. Frequent and
periodic inspection of a water tank is
proper and useful, but it should not
result in the owner's commitment to a
contract for work to be done at an un.
certain future date or at a price not ar-
rived at by proper competition.
By the issuance of this document, it
is not intended to imply that water
departments or companies are not, on
their own initiative, competent to de-
vclop equitable contracts, Neither is
INTRODUCTION
it implied that any member of the as-
sociations involved is required to use
the procedure herein outlined. The as-
sociations have no power or intent to
stipulate that a precise procedure must
be followed in any phase of water
works operation and maintenance.
The associations, likewise, are not in
a position to police the entire field of
contractual operations of water depart-
,
merits and companies. They must
content themselves with providing for
their members what is considered the
best information available on any sub-
ject which is documented. It must
remain with the responsible executives
in the water department or compact}
to protect the interest of the commu-
nity which they serve.
DWI
AWWA DIo1-53 (R1979)
Part A
AWWA Standard for
Inspecting Steel Tanks, Standpipes, Reservoirs,
and Elevated Tanks, for Water Storage
Section A=1—General
Bee. A-1.1—Scope
Every steel water storage tank,
;t;utdpipe or reservoir should be care-
fully inspected prior to repair and/or
repainting and at any time when leak-
-19c or some other apparent deteriora-
tion is observed. In any event, all
water tanks should be thoroughly in-
spected at intervals of not more than
five years. The standard for painting
steel water storage tanks, AWWA
DI02, includes is an option a first att-
niversary inspectiolt to be perforated
by the tank Fainting contracts€r. Also.
the Foreword suggests that defective
areas he repaired annually. It is the
intent of this document to define the
requisite qualifications of the inspect-
ing agency, the type of inspection to be
€wade and the data considered essential.
Sec. A-1.2—Inspection Service
Under the terms of this recom-
mended practice document, inspection
service shall be provided only by or-
ganizations or individuals who are
properly qualified to do such work.
chose so qualified are:
(1) An engineering organization
whose principals are registered profes-
sional engineers, specializing in in-
spection service and having at least five
years' experience in the inspection of
steel structures
(2) Independent engineers, li-
censed in the state in which the struc-
ture is located, whose practice has in-
cluded substantial or major attention
to steel construction
(3) Inspection or safety agencies
of the state in which the structure is
located, if such agencies are empowered
to render inspection service and, fur•
ther, if such inspection services involve
the employment of personnel experi-
enced in steel construction and mainte-
nance.
In all of the above classes of quail -
fled inspection agencies, the inspector
or inspectors assigned to, the work in
the field shall have been properly
trained by the organization so qualified
and shall have no interest, other than
that of a competent inspector, in the
performance of any work under con-
sideration at the time the inspection is
made.
Sec. A-1.3—Responsibility
The inspector shall assume the en•
tire responsibility for accident to him-
self while inspecting the structure. He
shall make such observations of ladders,
railings, roof rods and other parts of
the structure as may be necessary to
determine their safety for use by him
in inspecting the structure. The in-
G - I\SPECTI\G AND REPAIRING STEEL TANKS
specting company or inspector shall
carry adequate workmen's compensa-
tion, property -damage and public -lia-
bility insurance and shall fully' protect
the owner against claims of any nature
arising out of the inspection work.
Sec. A-1.4—Draining of Tank
The owner, following proper notifi-
cation, shall have the tank emptied for
the inspector in order that the inside of
the roof, sides and bottom of the tank
will be property exposed for inspection.
The inside surfaces shall be thoroughly
hcd down by the owner to remove
�„me from wail surfaces and loose de-
posits and dirt from the tank bottom
before the inspector arrives. This is
essential.
Sec. A-1.5—Work Included
The work included under this in-
spection shall consist of: (1) a field ex-
amination; and (2) a specific report
upon the structure, using the informa-
tion form which is a part of this
document (Sec. A-2 and A-3) supple-
mental wherever necessary to fit pe-
culiar local conditions. The inspection
work does not include repairs, except
that, if cotter pins or nut pins are found
to be missing, they shall be replaced at
once, or else a special report shall -be
made promptly to the owner so that he
may have the pins replaced.
Section A-2—Examination and Report
Bee. A-2.1-10ondition of Paint
Under the general heading ” Condi-
tion of Paint,,, give a description of
flee condition of the paint as found,
sating:
(1) Rough approximation of per
cent of rust area
(2) Special locations of such areas,
tgregated
(3) Character of such rust areas—
that is, whether general or blotchy.eor-
rosion, loose paint or none.
Sec. A-2.2—Pitting
Determine and report upon the ex-
tent and depth of pitting in the area
selected, scaled and cleaned by the in-
spector- The dimensions and loca�
tions of each area scaled and cleaned
are to be reported. The extent of
pitting found should he described both
as to location and character. The rec-
ord of depth of pitting should be as spe-
cific as practicable as to location, area
affected; whether blotchy, deep, pin-
point or general corrosion. Depth
gages should be used to obtain specific
data. Report as in Table 1.
If plates are badly pitted, report
whether drilling holes to determine the
plate thickness is recommended.
Set. A-2.3—Type of Repairs
Where pitting has penetrated to a
depth indicating the necessity for re-
pairs, the report shall so state specifi-
cally, describing the location of such
spots and their size- If they can be
repaired by patches, the inspector shall
specify to the extent practicable the
size, location and number of patches.
If other types of repairs are indicated,
the inspector shall specify clearly the
type and extent recommended, (Use
the same plate reference numbers as in
SECTION A-7
TABLE I
Stun ple Pilling Report
Locnlinn (by 1,1-.
I'er Cent of Arca
Ata.. Depth
nnbeled I—.
Affect.d
of Pilling
Type of Pitting
plate Thick—
® root down)
® (.DDm..)
Found
t
z
3
etc.
bottom
Table 1,) The inspector, in his re-
port, shall inform the owner of all
repair work which he considers neces-
sary. The report need not be limited
to the items specifically outlined herein,
but should include all items of any na-
ture which the inspector considers ma-
terial.
Section A-3—Detailed Report of Inspector
Sec. A-3.1—Items to Be Reported
In addition to the descriptive report
outlined under Section A-2, the in-
spector shall report on the details item-
ized below.
,,1,1—Anchor Botts
(1) Are the anchor holes rusted
so as to reduce their strength materi-
ally? If so, caliper and record the
smallest section. Advise replacement
if :onsidered necessary.
(2) Are the anchor bolt nuts
tight?
3.1.2—Cotunin Sbaes
(1) Are the column shoes clean
and painted ?
(2) Has dirt accumulated?
(3) Are the column shoes seri-
ously rusted? if so, where and to
What depth?
?.1.3—Towrr
(1) Are the tower posts in
line?
(2) Is there any indication of
settlement in the foundations?
(3) Are the tower rods in good
adjustment and well turned up?
(4) Are the tower rods in good
condition? If badly rusted, measure
the smallest part and report, indicating
rods on which reduced section oolurs.
( Advise replacement if considered nec-
essary.)
3.1.4—Cotter Pins
(1) Examine each pin for the
presence of cotter pins. Report the
location of any pins not so fitted.
(2) Where rod pins with nuts are
used, advise if the nuts are on with full
thread and the end of the thread is
well battered.
3.1.5—Riser Pipe
(1) is the riser pipe straight?
(2) Are the riser pipe stay rods
in good condition?
(3) Is the frost casing in good
condition and properly supported?
3.1.6—indications of Leakage
(1) ,Are there any indications of
leakage in the riser pipe?
81 INSPECTING AND RGPAIRtNC,, STREt. TANKS
(2) In the expansion joint?
(3) In the tank proper? If so,
give the location and state the type of
repair indicated.
3.1.7—Ladder
Is the ladder safe''.
3.1.8—Balcony
( I ) is the balcony .ate
(2) Is the balcony floor in good
condition ?
(3) State the amount of nut ac-
cumulated on the halconv (tour
3,1,9 --Bolts
Are any bolts or rivets Omitted or
missing in the spliced connections of
tower, struts and balcony?
:10 --Paint
Report rut each of the following items
(1) The condition of the paint and
metal of the tower
(2) The condition of the paint and
mctal on the outside of the tank bot-
tom, particularly underneath the bal.
cony and post connections
(3) The condition of the paint and
metal outside of the tank shell
(4) Tile condition of the paint and
metal outside of the roof and under
the eaves of the roof
(S) The condition of the paint
and metal inside of the tank shell.
based on the areas carefully examined
and other information gained by the
t --)cctor. (Each sheet shall be care -
examined, removing enough, of
the accumulation of scale and rust to
enable the inspector to report in detail
the exact condition of the metal under-
neath and the extent of rust and pit-
ting.)
(6) The condition of the paint
and metal on the inside of the roof
(7) The condition of the spider
and Spicer rods.
(8) The finial connection. (Is it
solid and safe for the attachment of
the painter's trolley?)
(9) The condition of the paint
and metal on the inside of the bot-
tom of the tank
(10) The condition of the paint
and metal inside of the riser pipe, par-
ticularly at the bottom of the riser pipe.
3.1.11—Rivets
Report, by selecting, scaling and ex-
amining suitable areas, the condition of
the rivets at lap joints and post con-
nections.
3.1.12—Metal
Report, by selecting areas to be ex-
amined, the condition of the metal be-
tween the rivets at the laps and at the
Post connections.
3.1.13—Tank Boltoun
Has the bottom of the tank deteri-
orated because of its having been cov.
ered with mud or scale? If so, what
conditions are olkserved? Will seal-
ing and repainting he satisfactory? Are
repairs indicated ? if so, describe in
detail.
3.1.14—Prior Painting
(1) When was the tank reported
to have been last painted?
(2) What material was used?
Sec. A-3.2—Disposition of Report
3.2.1. Two copies of the inspection_
report shall he delivered to the owner
3.2.2. it is understood between the
owner and the inspection company
that copies Of the inspection retaort
€nap be tnnade available by the owner
to painting nr tank repair contractors,
to define the condition of the tank, if
bids for repair or painting are desired.
Sec. A-33—Payment
Payment for the above specified serv-
ices.
er'.ices, including all expenses of the in.
spector, shall be at the lump sum price
agreed upon between the owner and
the inspector. Payment shall be made
within thirty days after the receipt of
the inspection report.
F
DKI
SECTION A -a
Section A -4 --Cleanliness
The inspector shall conduct all his
work in a clean and sanitary manner.
No one shall work in a tank if he
has been under a physician's care, or
has needed a physician's care, within a
seven-day period prior to entering
or working in the tank. No person
shall be permitted to work in a tank
who has an abnormal temperature or
gives evidence of illness. The tanks
owner, or a physician employed by him.
shall Ire the judge of the physical fitness
or unfitness of any person to enter or
work in a tank. No deviation from this
stipulation may be permitted.
The tank owner, after work of any
nature is done in a tank, is charged
with satisfying himself that the tank
interior is dean and sanitary before
the tank is returned to service. Al-
though a contractor may be required
by his contract to clean all surfaces
thoroughly before a tank is restored to
service, it is the ultimate responsibility
of the tank owner either to give the
tank a final field inspection or to re-
quire such laboratory tests of the
quality of water held (for test pur-
poses) in the tank as will demonstrate
the good sanitary condition of,the tank
interior.
Owl
Part B AWWA DIQ1-53 (R1979)
AWWA Standard for
Repairing Steel Tanks, Standpipes, Reservoirs,
and Elevated Tanks, for Water Storage
Introtinotton
Every tank repair job should be pre-
the cost of the repairs and submit eco•
ceded by a detailed inspection of the
nomical proposal therefor.
structure and a report by a competent
The owner, using the inspector's re -
inspector. Part A of this document
port as a basis, shall define and list the
deals with inspection. Only from such
repairs to be made, Bids should be
an inspection is it possible for the tank
made on a fixed-price basis.
owner to determine the character and
It is recognized that specifications for
extent of the repairs needed. Without
repair work must necessarily rather
such a determination, it is impossible
I
s
general' but the following o work
mended as likely to secure good work
to define the repair work to be done
from responsible bidders at reasonable
so that prospective bidders can estimate
and definite cost.
Section B-1—General
Sec. B-4.1—Work to Be Done
The specifications and contract shall
cover alt repair work to be done and all
compensation to be paid or received
therefor. There shall be no other
agreements relating either to the work
or to compensation.
Sec. B-1.2—Inspection Recorded
The owner shall advise that he has
halt the structure inspected (naming the
inspector) and that a copy of the in.
,pection report is available. The bid.
tiers shall familiarize themselves with
the report and the conditions of the
structure and, upon request to the
owner and under such conditions as
the owner may prescribe, may make
such further inspection as they con-
sider necessary, prior to submitting
proposals,
T
Sec. B-1.3—Work to Be Itemised
The owner shall itemize repair wont
by units, such as the number of patch
Plates to be welded to the structure and
their approximate average area; the
lineal feet of welding or calking to
make the warns watertight; the spider
rods to be replaced: the new roof or
parts to be replaced, and so forth.*
* Rivett—For a great many years, it weal
the ceuton, far tank :nanufactnrers to drier
tank rivets rsdtA flat hoods an the inside.
After a number of }Tart, a flat -Arad rivet,
which pony have rutted to sante rxtrnt, ap-
pears to have Fast the major portion of its
head, tphr,€, in reality. only a s,aall part has
dootteared and rhe rivet has many years of
life remaining, Rivers do their mark its
shear and at there it very little tention farce
oxi a rivet, tier head can riot nearly canny°
before rrplacentral is ttecrtsary, At long at
a rivet stays tight in its hole, it fulfills its
fanrtion and dots not hater to br rrplarrd.
_ iz ._ INSITCTisc AND arrnnusc SH'I't. Tanta
It is recommended that, in general,
welding on tank plates to replace im-
paired thickness be limited to filling
of pits; and that extensive welding
over the surfaces of plates or of riv-
eted seams be carefully considered and
used only where replacement will not
be practicable. All welding performed
in the replacement of plates or broken
parts. or for other repairs, shall be per-
formed in accordance with the welding
provisions of A1\'1\'A DiOO. "Sean.
Section B-2
No payment shall be made for any
,work other than the hump sum amount
bits by the contractor, except upon
w';ritcn order of the owner or his au-
tl.orizcd representative, prior to the be.
Vinning of the work for which extra
rOnmen,"htttr is to be requested, When
extra work is so authorized, it shall be
based upon an agreed Sump sum or unit
price, or compensation therefor shall
consist of the actual cost of materials
used in the extra ;work; plus the cost
Of all labor, together with the prorated
cost to the contractor for the time ac-
tually spent on the extra work by the
job foreman; plus rental of equipment,
not on hand at the site of the work,
which is necessary for the extra
-c involved, both the necessity of
lard for Welded Steel Llevated "Tanks.
Standpipes, and Reservoirs for Nater
Storage."
Sec. B-1.4—Lump sum Bids
Bids shall be on a lump sum basis,
including all the contractor's costs,
such as transportation, labor, tools,
equipment, insurance, delays or other
costs of any nature growing out of the
repair work above tlefuled.
—Extra Work
such equipment and its rental cost being
subject to acceptance by the tank
owner; plus power, file], .eater, and
similar operating costs; plus incidental
expenses incurred as a direct require-
ment of the extra work, including pay.
roll taxes, workmens compensation and
other insurance based on payroll costs,
and any increase in bond premium cost
chargeable to the increase in contract
amount as a result of the extra work.
To the alcove shall be added 15 per cent
to cover adininistrative costs and con-
tractor's profit, which percentage shall
be the only amount to be paid in addi-
tion to the above mentioned costs. No
claim shall be made for delays caused
by the extra work.
Section B-3—Watertightness
All work shall he dont by extreri-
enced iynrkmen, using equipment best
arlantetl to the work. Unon completion
of the repair work, the structures shall
Ice watertight. The standard for welded
steel tanks for crater storage, AWWA
DIOO, requires testing for leaks bw fill -
119 the tank with water before it is
Painted. Repair work shall be neatly
done Payment for repair work shall
not be made until and unless the job
is watertight in the areas in which the
contractor was called upon to make re-
pairs to secure watertiglttttess.
DKI
IWI
"ECTIas tt-I is
Section B -4 --Responsibility
The contractor shall carry adequate owner against suits of any nature
insurance—property, public and ent- which may arise out of work performed
players' liability—and shall protect the by the contractor.
Section B-5—Inspection
The owner shall inspect the repair
work as it is being done or employ in
inspector to do so. Payment for work
clone shall be made only after the owner
has satisfied himself directly that the
work is satisfactory; or after an in-
Spector's report has been filed with the
owner certifying that tite work has been
done properly and in accordance with
the terms of the contract.
It is in the mutual interest of the
owner and the contractor that such in.
spection be made promptly.
Section B -G --Cleanliness
The contractor and all workmen em-
ployed by him shall contloet all opera-
tions in a clean and sanitary manner.
No nuisance shall be committed it, a
tank; the workmen shall either use
proper waste receptacles or leave the
tank whenever necessity arises.
The tank owner, after wort: of any
nature is done in a tank, is charged
with satisfying himself that the tank
interior is clean and sanitary before the
tank is returned to service. Although
a contractor may he required by his
contract to clean all repairs thoroughly
before a tank is restored to service, it
is the ultimate responsihility of the tank
owner either to give the tank a final field
inspection or to require such laboratory
tests of the quality of water held (for
test purposes) in the tank as will dem-
onstrate the good sanitary condition of
the tank interior.
U0*,*0409 a
Illinois Department of Transportation
Division of Highways/District 1
201 West Center Court/Schaumburg,lllinois/60196-1096
C E R T I F I E D M A I L.
October 11, 1989
BUREAU OF DESIGN
Pillage d -T- count Prospect/State of Illinois
Joint Agreement
Wolf Road
State Section: 3539R-87
Cook County
The Honorable Carolyn H. Krause
Mayor
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Mayor Krause:
Submitted are two (2) copies of the Supplemental Joint
Agreement for the subject improvement. Please have the
Supplemental Agreement executed by the Village Board, complete
with all required Ordinances and plan approval, and return both
copies to this office for further processing.
Please be advised that in order for this project to meet its
scheduled letting, the executed Agreement must be received by
this office prior to November 10, 1989.
Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel
free to contact Mr. Earl Jandacek at (312)705-4238.
Very truly yours,
James C. Slifer, P.E.
District Engineer
By:
Ken Macander,
Bureau Chief of.Design
KFM:ESJ:sp
Enclosures
cc: Mr. Herbert Weeks - Village Director
6883r
SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT entered into this day
of A.D., 19 by and between the STATE OF ILLINOIS,
acting by and through its DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, hereinafter called the
STATE, and the VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, County of Cook, of the State of
Illinois, hereinafter called the VILLAGE.
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the VILLAGE has requested a 20" steel casing crossing Wolf Road
approximately 800 lineal feet south of Euclid Avenue (approximately Station
101+25) and a 16" steel casing crossing the Feehanville Ditch (approximately
63+50) and;
WHEREAS, the STATE has agreed to include this additional work in the
contract providing the VILLAGE agrees to the following:
1. The VILLAGE has, or will comply with all terms covered in the Agreement
executed on the 1st day of June, 1988, except as hereinafter stated.
2. Add to Item #4 the following:
The VILLAGE also agrees to reimburse the STATE for 100% of all engineering
and construction costs associated with the installation of the proposed
20" and 16" steel casings. The total additional cost to the VILLAGE is
estimated to be $11,000.00.
3. Add to Item #5 the following:
"The VILLAGE has passed an additional resolution appropriating sufficient
funds to pay its share of the cost of this additional work, a copy of
which is attached hereto as Exhibit AA and made a part hereof."
"Upon execution ofthis Supplemental Agreement, the
VILLAGE will pay to the Department of Transportation of the
State of Illinois in a lump sum, from any funds allotted to
the VILLAGE, an amount equal to 95% of its obligation
incurred under this Supplemental Agreement and will pay to
said Department the remainder of its obligation in a lump
sum upon completion of the project, based upon final costs.
4. Add to Item #10 the following:
The VILLAGE will also be responsible for the jurisdiction of
THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit
of the parties hereto, their successors and assigns.
ATTEST:
(SEAL)
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
By
VILLAGE Pres—WRT
Date: l9
STATE OF ILLINOIS
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
By
Date: 19
MAYOR
B.
GERALD L, FARLEY
TRUSTEES
sides of Bishop Court
RALPH W ARTHUR
C.
MARK W BUSSE
TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN
Village Easement to B -Box
LEO FLOROS
COMMITTEE REPORTS
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
THEODORE J WAT7ENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A FIELDS
D.
A G E N D A
Vi.
Phone 312 392-6000
BUSINESS
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
A.
Regular Meeting
October 18, 1989
Discussion of Affordable Housing
Trustees$ Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
C.
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P. M.
I.
CALL TO ORDER
Ii.
ROLL CALL
III.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF OCTOBER 4, 1989 MEETING
IV.
SUBDIVISIONS
A. Kensington Center Resubdivision 27, west side of
VII.
Lakeview Court
B.
Kensington Center Resubdivision 28, south and east
sides of Bishop Court
C.
Plat of Easement, Lot 4, 807 Kennicott Place, for
Village Easement to B -Box
V.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A.
Community Development Committee Mr. Richardson
B.
Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern
C.
Development Code Committee Mr. Kloster
D.
Text Amendment Committee Mr. Velasco
Vi.
OLD
BUSINESS
A.
Discussion of Fair Housing ordinance
B.
Discussion of Affordable Housing
C.
Discussion of Mayor Farley's comments regarding the
review of the Comprehensive Plan and Landscaping
Ordinance
D.
Discussion of Zoning Requirement to Consolidate
Single Family Parcels
VII.
NEW
BUSINESS
Viii.
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
IX.
ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
OCTOBER 4, 1989
CALL TO ORDER
Present Upon Roll Call: Tom Borrelli
Lynn Kloster
Tom McGovern
William Navigato
Errol Richardson
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Absent: Frank Boege
Frank Breitsameter
Village.Staff Present: Michael Sims, Staff Planner
Press Staff Present: Cecilia M. Barreda, Mt. Prospect Journal
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
In the September 20, 1989 meeting the vote was 4Aye,;3Nay on two
motions,(l) that sidewalks on the cul-de-sac bulb not be required
and (2) that the request for Pate's Resubdivision be approved.
The minutes read that Chairman Weibel declared the motion failed
for lack of -ac-7m. Mr. Weibel pointed out that it should have
been"failed for lack of five Aye votes.' Mr. Borrelli moved,and
seconded by Mr. Velasco, that the minutes of Septem'8er 20, 1989,
as corrected, be approved. All members voted Aye and Chairman
Weibel declared the minutes approved.
SUBDIVISIONS
Ka,thgop Estates Unit 2 Subdivision - Applicant requested approval
for a subdivision creating four single family lots and a develop-
ment code modification for non -radial lot lines on two lots.
Mr. Greg Miller, representing the applicant,was present to
answer any questions concerning the request. Mr. Velasco moved,
and seconded by Mr. Richardson, that the request for non -radial
lines between Lots 9 and 10 and Lots 10 and 11 be approved. The
vote was 7 Aye: 0 Nay and Chairman Weibel declared the motion
passed.
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr.Richardsonf that the
Kathcon Estates Unit 2 Subdivision be approved. The vote was
unanimous and Chairman Weibel declared the motion passed.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community
Development: No report
B. Comprehensive
Plan: No report
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES RAGE 2
OCTOBER 4, 1989
C. Development
Code: No report
D. Text Amendment: No report
NEW BUSINESS
Discussion with Ma"or Gerald: Ski Farle - Mayor Farley was
present at the meeting to talk to the Commission. His comments
included some things he would like to see the Commission do
such as identifying various items that come up from time to
time that need implementation in the comprehensive plan. An
example was the establishment of -a bike path that is currently
in the works. He could see the Commission in the role of insti-
gator for things to be done. Also, he looked to furthering
working relationships between the Plan Commission and Zoning
Board for updating text amendments, etc. Mr. Weibel added
that Development Code updating was also needed.
The mayor asked the commission members if there were any
problems they might have concerning Village Board actions.
He said the Board quite often waives second readingsbut if
there is no controversy_ raised within either the Board or the
Plan Commission, they feel comfortable with this. The commission
members agreed that they had no problem with that.
Mr. Velasco'raised a question, concerning closed meetings in
connection with fair housing deliberations that he thought
the village board might 'want to address. He thought there may
be circumstances were a closed meeting was advisable but under
present regulations the Plan Commission cannot hold private
meetings in such matters.
At the conclusion of the discussion Mr. 'Weibel thanked Mayor
.Farley for his attending and sharing some of his thoughts with
the Commission members,. He assured the Mayor that the Commission
would follow uta on his suggestions and mentioned that there
were some items later in the ,current meeting agenda that fit
the criteria the Mayor had in mind.
OLD BUSINESS
Fair Hous'ing IOrdinance Discussion- During the discussion, Mr.
Weibel proposed that a fair housing hotline be established.
The question was raised however as to whether there is a housing
discrimination problem in Mount Prospect and that this might be
a response to lack of a problem. M. Weibel commented that if
there is a problem he would rather have the complaints come in
through the hotline than the court. Cost of establishing a hot
line was thought to be small.
Mr. Richardson left the meeting at 9:30P.M.
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 3
OCTOBER 4, 1989
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. Navigato, that the
Fair Housing ordinance be amended to provide for the mandatory
establishment of a Fair Housing Hotline and its publication
within the Village and the details as to how to publicize be
included in the ordinance. The vote was 5 Aye; 1 Nay and
Chairman Weibel declared the motion passed. Mr. Borrelli
stated that he had voted against the motion because he felt
it was not necessary and would not enhance the ordinance.
Affordable HouAinq Discussion - Mr. Weibel commented that he
thought there is a need for low-income housing, particularily
for seniors, in Mount Prospect but wondered how one could
guarantee that village residents would get the housing. This
will be checked with the Village attorney and Chairman Weibel
said further discussion would be carried over to the next
meeting. Mr. Velasco commented that he thought it might be a
good idea to convert the multiple family units in the Boxwood/
Dogwood area to affordable housing units.
Zoning ReauirgmAn+,q to Consolidate Sin !1 le 11' 1 1!L1Z_Za_rCelsThe
current zoning ordinance requires that when a home owner4s—
property falls on two lots of record he must resubdivide to
bring the property into one lot of record. Mr. McGovern
contended that this creates unnecessary expense and hardship
on owners of single family residences. The subject was discussed
by the commission members and all agreed that a change in the
ordinance was desirable but were uncertain of the wording to
recommend. Chairman Weibel suggested that a wording be worked
out for discussion at the next meeting.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Chairman declared the
meeting adjourned at 10:10 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary
Phone 312 / 392-6000
AGENDA
SIGN REVIEW BOARD
Monday, October 16, 1989
Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
7:30 P. M.
5IGN-11-89, Venture Stems, 1500 South Elmhurst Road
Petitioner seeks to vary the signage for the Venture Shopping Center by requesting a
special use equity option (Section 7.330.D) to allow a freestanding sign on each of two
outlots adjacent to Elmhurst Road, (Kentucky Fried Chicken and another yet to be
developed outlot). Petitioner plans to reduce the nonconforming Venture signage (two
freestanding and one wall sign) and forego the option of placing two tenant panels on the
Venture I.D. sign,
SIGN L-12-89, M Sips, Ing., (Brenre Shopping Centgr)
1706-1742 E. -KgnNingjon Road
This is a request by Brentwood Square Shopping Center with M & K Sign Company as
their representative to seek a special use equity option (Section 7.330.1) to allow 5 tenant
panels instead of the required two for their identification sign at the intersection of
Kensington and Wolf. This request meets the standards for special use as detailed in
Section 7.220 and qualifies for the special use equity option by not exceeding the maximum
permitted sign area, and contains a bonus provision, as stated in Section 7.320, namely that
individual letters or words are eligible for a 15% bonus when mounted directly to the
building surface.
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W BUSSE
TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENSERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A. FIELDS
Phone 312 / 392-6000
AGENDA
SIGN REVIEW BOARD
Monday, October 16, 1989
Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
7:30 P. M.
5IGN-11-89, Venture Stems, 1500 South Elmhurst Road
Petitioner seeks to vary the signage for the Venture Shopping Center by requesting a
special use equity option (Section 7.330.D) to allow a freestanding sign on each of two
outlots adjacent to Elmhurst Road, (Kentucky Fried Chicken and another yet to be
developed outlot). Petitioner plans to reduce the nonconforming Venture signage (two
freestanding and one wall sign) and forego the option of placing two tenant panels on the
Venture I.D. sign,
SIGN L-12-89, M Sips, Ing., (Brenre Shopping Centgr)
1706-1742 E. -KgnNingjon Road
This is a request by Brentwood Square Shopping Center with M & K Sign Company as
their representative to seek a special use equity option (Section 7.330.1) to allow 5 tenant
panels instead of the required two for their identification sign at the intersection of
Kensington and Wolf. This request meets the standards for special use as detailed in
Section 7.220 and qualifies for the special use equity option by not exceeding the maximum
permitted sign area, and contains a bonus provision, as stated in Section 7.320, namely that
individual letters or words are eligible for a 15% bonus when mounted directly to the
building surface.
. . ......... . .... - - ----
. . . ...... . .
.. . ...... . . . .
.. . . . . . ...... .. /
MOUNT PROSPECT RECYCLING COMMISSION
September 21, 1989 Meeting Minutes
PRESENT: Ken Westlake, Joe Kubik, Brian Robertson, Elizabeth Herbert,
Steve:Polit, George Luteri, Glen Andler and Lisa Angell.
Several residents from the community were also present.
ABSENT. Mary Winkler, Paul Hoefert and Dick Bachhuber.
The meeting was called to order at 7:35 PM, at which time Chairperson
Ken Westlake called for approval of the August Meeting Minutes. George
Luteri, Secretary cited the reference to a compost site (page 2,
paragraph 1, line 4) should read, landfill site. The correction was
duly noted and minutes were approved.
The following were updated under old Business:
I. Citizens Utilities (0i)
In addition to identifying new homeowners in this area, the
question was raised whether we had a means of reminding the
vacating resident that the recycling bin is Village property and
is to be left for the new resident. Glen Andler suggested Village
staff contact CU and ask that the individual doing the final water
meter reading remind the resident to leave the bin.
II. Park District
A. Vice Chair Steve Polit reported the Park District would be
willing to have recycling bins but questioned related costs
and revenue from the sale of materials. Glen Andler stated
he would contact Browning Ferris Industries (BFI) and Wally
Cook of the Park District.
B. Steve Polit also gave a presentation of the Park Districts
plan to pursue "Parks on Plastic". The program is similar to
the recent efforts by the city of Chicago. The Mount Prospect
Park District is proposing the collection of PET containers so
the plastic can be made i ' nto equipment, benches, etc. for the
parks. The Park District is suggesting there be drop-off
centers throughout the Village for the collection of the
bottles. Steve Polit suggested drop-offs be located at
grocery stores, however, George Luteri stated stores are
generally opposed to this. Steve Polit will contact local
retailers to assess -their interest. (Once the material is
collected and baled it would be shipped to Hammer Plastics in
Iowa Falls, Iowa for manufacturing.)
As the Park District would like Village support in the project
... .. . .. . .. . . . . .
the focus of discussion turned to when the Village intends to
include plastics in the curbside program. Mr. Andler informed
the Commission that BFI is unable to provide curbside
collection of plastics at this time but within the next 9 to
12 should have the capability to do so. The two factors
preventing collection at this time are, 1) a densifier needs
to be developed and 2Y a processing center purchased.
Based on this information Brian Robertson suggested the
Village not wait for curbside pick-up for collection of
plastics. Mr. Robertson indicated there is a great deal of
enthusiasm in this community for the collection of plastics.
Chairman Westlake concurred saying we should tell the Park
District full speed ahead. Dr. Luteri suggested a buy back
system as a means of motivating residents to collect plastics.
Mr. Polit will continue to communicate with the Park District
on this project.
III. Education (School Video)
Mr. Glen Andler asked that Steve Polit and Brian Robertson,
volunteers for video project, meet with Karen Giet, Cable
Administrator to develop two (2) concepts to be brought back to
the Commission. The video should be generic for long-term use
and there should be a written supplement students can take home.
Mr. Robertson shared a coloring book produced by Waste
Management for educating the "young" consumer.
Both Mr. Andler and Mr. Polit have contacted the schools on
recycling education. Mr. Andler stated the schools are willing
to cooperate but we must give consideration to their busy
curriculum. It is possible to place recycling bins in the
school, which BFI has already agreed to pick-up.
IV. Letter to Daily Herald
Chairman Westlake has started to draft the letter to the
newspaper urging them to at least give recycled paper a trial
run. He continued to update the Commission as to what legislative
action other states are taking to encourage the use of recycled
paper. Florida offers a deferential tax subsidy to publishers
buying recycled paper. Conneticut is more forceful, by mandating
the ratio of recycled paper be made according to circulation.
Steve Polit shared his recent discovery that the plastic bag the
Daily Herald is delivered in has a recycling notice on it! In
Mary Winkler's absence, Lisa Angell expressed the interest of the
Arlington Height's recycling representative in writing a joint
letter to the Daily Herald encouraging their use of recycled
paper -
In response to the discussion on recycled paper, Harold
Rentschler, resident shared an article about the Governor of
Iowa mandating state agencies to use recycled paper as well as
source. separation in the office.
V. Other
A. Review of August Recycling Report
B. Mr. Andler mentioned the state continues to use educational
materials developed by Mt. Prospect as a model for other
communities.`
C. Lisa Angell reviewed the complaint system when residents call
regarding service delivery. It was also reported that theft
of recyclables is way down. The suggestion was made to
advise residents to place recycling bins in a visible spot
via the Village Newsletter.
D. ChairmianWestlake related his interview with the League
of Women Voters on channel WCBR, September 4.: He offered the
tape to anyone who was interested. The Chairman was also
recently involved in a 25 minute interview, with the Daily
Herald in which he spent most of the time deflecting
questions on the yard materials issue and what Mt. Prospect
plans to do. TCI has requested a representative from the
Commission participate in an interview on the 28th of
September, Vice Chair Steve Polit will participate in the
interview.
E. Chairman Westlake spoke with Mayor Farley regarding
Commission members attending seminars at Village expense.
This is not a practice of any Commission members or elected
officials.
With the comment that the July 1990 ban on leaves and yard materials in
the landfill will probably not be postponed the Commission moved on to
New Business; 'Yard Materials.
Chairman Westlakesuggested a feasibility study on alternatives. Mr.
Andler stated Public Works could provide cost factors and continued to
,outline one alternative ,proposal..
1) Leaves The existing leaf program would need to expanded beyond
the current time frame, is, last full week before Thanksgiving.
Extension of the program would have to be coordinated so equipment
could still be prepared for snow removal.
2) Grass clippings Residents be encouraged to leave grass on lawns
or compost. In lieu of pick-up an iterim or on-going drop-off
site for clippings could be developed at Melas Park. BFI would
then transfer to a composting site. A drop-off site would require
staff supervision during open hours. Mr. Andler also stated he ,
would obtain data from BFI outlining their costs for collection as
well as costs for bag system.
3)' 'Brush Collection' could be performed by BFI or Public Works.
October Public Works crews would service an area one (1) time per
month.
Mr. Andler informed the Commission it is not feasible for the Village
to develop its' own compost site.
Dr. Luteri presented his perception of what options the Village had
ranging from Full Service to No Service. His presentation suggested
there are several critical factors that must be addressed before policy
is set, including political and departmental ramifications. A concern
for an equitable solution was also voiced.
Several Commission members shared their personal preference and options
other communities are considering. Mr. Kubik strongly feels grass
clippings should be left on lawns. Apparently Skokie is proposing the
purchase of mulching lawnmowers for their residents.. Another community
is considering compost containers.
At this point, residents were given the opportunity to share their
concerns or suggestions. The residents expressed a sincere concern for
the landfill crisis but would like to seethe Village resolve disposal
of yard materials without risk to their lawns. One resident stated he
would be willing to collect his clippings and take them to a drop-off
site, another stated she might consider back yard composting with the
proper education available to her. The residents are willing to work
with the Village to reach an equitable and cost-effective method of
disposal however, they do not accept the fact that leaving grass
clippings on the lawn will not hurt the lawn. One gentleman feels over
a period of time the money he has invested into his lawn would be lost
and utimately the lawn condition would reduce the value of his
property.
Chairman Westlake thanked the residents for their input and stated it
was the charge of the Commission to look at the pros and cons of all
viable options. Mr. Andler stated he would develop the costs and
labor data associated with his proposal, to be available for the
October meeting. He will also contact BFI in regard to the collection
and disposal costs of yard material to a compost site. Mr. Andler
reminded the Commission of the time constraints'they must work with;
the budgeting process for the Public Works Department begins in
November.
Additional aspects of the yard materials issue were:
1) Steve Polit stated all factors must be addressed in the long-term.
2) George Luteri alerted Commission members that the existing contract
with the scavenger would have to renogiated because of the
reduction in cubic yards going to the landfill.
Mr. Otto, resident, asked the members if the Commission had ever been
approached by a volunteer group wanting to do a one (1) day drive.
The Commission concurred that although they had not been approached in
the past they certainly would support such an event.
The nest meeting was set for Thursday, October 19, and there being no
other business the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 PH.
Respectfully submitted,
K. Lisa nn 1l
Administrative Aide
AGENDA
MOUNT 'PROSPECT RECYCLING COm'tlssim
OCTOBER 26, 1989
Conference Room B, Public Works Facility
1700 West Central Road
7:30PM
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES SEPTEMBER 21, 1989 MEETING
IV. OLD BUSINESS
A. Yard Materials
1. Leaves
2—Grass Clippings
3. Brush
B. Education Video
V. NEW BUSINESS
VI. 'NEXT MEETING
VII'. ADJOURNMENT