The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About4143_001Next Ordinance No. 4095 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Next Resolution No. 40-89 A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D E R 0 F ' B U S I N E S S REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday Senior Citizen Center September 19, 1989 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 14100113 f I. CALL TO ORDER Ii. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald IlSkipll Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van GeeM Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg III. INVOCATION - Trustee Wattenberg IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, September 5, 1989 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VII- MAYORIS REPORT A. PROCLAMATIONS: 1. National Education Day, September 20 2. Mental Illness Awareness Week, October 1 - 7 3. Chamber of Commerce Week, September 24 - 30 4. Emergency Medical Services Week, September 16 - 22 B. PRESENTATION: Pam Doran, Honorary Emergency Medical Technician C. Employee Recognition - Public Works Employees D. A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF COOK COUNTY (Exhibit A) VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. 1. ZBA 49-V-89, Amoco oil, Southwest corner of Wolf & Euclid 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF ROAD AND EUCLID AVENUE This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a revised site plan for the food mart/gas station. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B) 2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF ROAD AND EUCLID AVENUE This Ordinance grants modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) to permit a dry detention basin floor slope of not less than 1%; building no closer than 50 feet to the detention facility; and, building no closer than 1-1/2 feet from finished floor and floodway limit. The Plan Commission recommended granting the requested modifications from the Development Code by a vote of 8-0. (Exhibit C) B. ZBA 47-V-89, 1004 West Lincoln Street 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1004 W. LINCOLN ST. This Ordinance grants a variation to permit a 31 311 side yard setback for a patio, rather than the required 8 feet and a fence height of 51 611. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests. (Exhibit D) C. ZBA 51-V-89, 128 South Waverly Place 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 128 WAVERLY PLACE This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a 31 611 side yard instead of the required 61 611 in order to expand the existing attached garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit E) D. ZBA 55-V-89, 1707 Myrtle 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1707 MYRTLE This Ordinance grants a variation to permit an existing patio enclosure to remain 5.75 feet from the detached garage and to permit a driveway width of 27.75 feet instead of the permitted 21 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-1. (Exhibit F) IX. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 58-V-89, 808 Edgewood The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit a driveway width of 491 1011 instead of the 451 width previously approved. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 5-0. B. Accept easements for "B" boxes for properties located on Kennicott Place. C. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, BALEFILL DEVELOPMENT (Exhibit G) X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Land Acquisition and review minutes of Executive Sessions. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT September 5, 1989 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Leo Floros Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Wattenberg INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Corcoran. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, APPROVE MINUTES moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held August 15, 1989. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 754,665 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 52,080 community Development Block Grant Fund 53,343 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 20,718 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 82,258 Parking System Revenue Fund 2,100 Risk Management Fund 61,458 P.W. Facility Construction Fund A - P.W. Facility Construction Fund B - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 6,122 Special Service Area Const. #5 - Special Service Area Const. #6 - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) 875 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) - Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 1,802 Debt Service Funds - Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund 66,060 Police Pension Fund 43,587 Firemen's Pension Fund 35,088 Benefit Trust Fund $1,180,156 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD HISTORICAL Dolores Haugh, President of the Mount Prospect MUSEUM FUND Historical Society, along with Paul Hoefert and Jay Fritz, announced that the goal of $50,000 has been met for the restoration of the new museum site at 101-103 South Maple Street. The First Chicago Bank gave an additional $5,000 which resulted in reaching the goal. PETITION: Don Harmon, 16 North William Street, presented a BUSSE SCHOOL Petition requesting the Village to remove the PARKING existing asphalt parking area located within the parkway on Henry Street in front of Busse School. Mr. Harmon noted that approximately 300 residents in the general area of this property signed the Petition. Mayor Farley noted that a meeting will be held Wednesday evening at 7:30 P.M. on September 6th, at Busse School in order for representatives of the Village and Mount Prospect Park District (property owners) to explain the proposed use of this site. The public is invited to attend. MAYOR'S REPORT PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Farley presented a proclamation honoring JOSHUA MAY Joshua Mayo, a nine year old boy who was hit by an automobile, suffering extensive injuries. Joshua accepted the Proclamation. Mayor Farley also presented Certificates of Appreciation to the Mount Prospect Police Association and resident Robert Rankin for donating reward money for finding a valuable dog that was lost to the Joshua Mayo medical expense fund. CITIZENSHIP DAY Mayor Farley proclaimed September 17 as citizenship Day and the week of September 17 - 23 as Constitution Week, acknowledging the 202 anniversary of the U. S. Constitution. WAR ON DRUGS Mayor Farley presented a Resolution that expresses the support of the Village and residents for the national policy on the illegal sale and use of drugs. RES.NO. 39-89 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution No. 39-89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. AMEND CH. 13 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend the Class "GIN liquor license classification to permit serving any type of alcoholic beverage a maximum of 30 events a year, provided the Village Manager is notified 5 days in advance of the event. The Mount Prospect Park District is the only licensee holding a Class 11G11 liquor license. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ORD.NO. 4086 for passage of Ordinance No. 4086 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. OLD BUSINESS ZBA 39-V-89, 1813 Maya Lane ZBA 39-V-89 An Ordinance was presented for second reading that 1813 MAYA LN would allow a 10, front yard instead of the required 301 in order to install a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO.4086 to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 39-V-89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 40-V-89, St. Paul Lutheran School, 30n S. School ZBA 40-V-89 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that ST. PAUL SCHOOL would grant variations in order to replace the 100 SCHOOL ST. existing school building and permit the existing parsonage (teachery) as an accessory building. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the variations by votes of 6-0. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO. 4087 for passage of Ordinance No. 4087 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ST. PAUL LUTHERAN SCHOOL, 100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. September 5, 1989 - Page 3 MODIFICATIONS An Ordinance was presented for first reading that DEVELOPMENT would grant modifications from the Development Code CODE (Chapter 16) relative to the construction of the new St. Paul's School. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4088 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4088. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET September 5, 1989 - Page 4 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ST.PAUL The St. Paul School Plat of Subdivision was presented. SUBDIVISION This subdivision consolidates several lots in to one lot of record. The Plan Commission has reviewed this subdivision and recommended approval. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his signature on the St. Paul Plat of Subdivision. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 44 -SU -89 & ZBA 44 -SU -89 and ZBA 45-V-89, 410 S. Meier Road ZBA 45-V-89 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 410 S. MEIER RD. would grant a Special Use to allow a 4 -car garage 980 square feet in size. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4089 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4089. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 410 S. MEIER ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Notion carried. September 5, 1989 - Page 4 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would ZBA 49-V-89 grant a variation to permit a driveway width of 39 feet. 1609 E. EUCLID The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this (AMOCO) request by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg MODIFICATIONS Nays: None DEVELOPMENT Motion carried. CODE Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved ORD.NO.4090 for passage of Ordinance No. 4090 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 410 SOUTH MEIER ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 48-V-89, 1808 Cree Lane ZBA 48-V-89 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 1808 CREE LN would permit a 7' -'r-)rt yard and a 31 311 side yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 4-2. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO. 4091 for passage of Ordinance No. 4091 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1808 CREE LANE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 49-V-89, 1609 E. Euclid Avenue (Amoco) ZBA 49-V-89 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 1609 E. EUCLID grant a variation to allow for a revised site plan (AMOCO) for the proposed food-mart/gas station, which was originally approved last year. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. Also presented for first reading was an Ordinance MODIFICATIONS granting modifications from the Development Code DEVELOPMENT to permit a dry detention basin floor slope of CODE not less than 1% and to permit a building no closer than 50 feet to the detention facility. David Schein, 512 Na Wa Ta, stated that the floodway September 5, 1989 - Page 5 limit does not permit buildings to be located within the floodway plain and questioned the Village's authority to grant such a variation. It was noted that the Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Waterways, has approved this request due to the fact that the building is not located with the designated floodway. Trustee Van Geem questioned the wording in the original Ordinance, No. 3980, noting that it addressed the hours of operation etc. and asked that the Ordinance being considered in no way alter that restriction. These ordinances will be presented for second readings at the next meeting, September 19th. Mrs. Pietrzykowski, who lives behind the Subject Property stated that she has a 5 foot high cedar fence and if the Petitioner puts up his fence she would not be able to maintain her fence in the appropriate manner. The Petitioner stated that he would locate his fence 12 inches from his lot line and since the neighbor's fence is 611 off her property line, that would result in an 1811 space between fences for maintenance purposes. The Petitioner also stated that he would provide a gate or removable section of fence so that 1811 area would be accessible. Following discussion on the matter and hearing the neighbors concerns, the Village Board determined that the 51 611 fence height requested was reasonable Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals recommendation Page 6 - September 5, 1989 NEW BUSINESS ZBA 47-V-89 ZBA 47-V-89, 1004 West Lincoln Street 1004 LINCOLN The Petitioner requested a variation to permit a 611 side yard setback for a patio rather than the required 8 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting a variation to permit a 31 311 side yard setback, which is agreeable to the Petitioner. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant a side yard variation to permit a 31 311 setback, rather than the required 8 feet. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting on September 19th. APPEAL FROM Also requested in ZBA 47-V-89, was a variation to DECISION OF ZBA permit a 51 611 fence height, which the Zoning Board of Appeals, being final in this instance, granted by a vote of 6-0. Pursuant to provisions of the Village Code an Appeal from the Zoning Board of Appeals decision was filed by Joan Robertson and Jane Pietrzykowski which brought the fence height request to the Village Board for a final decision. Mrs. Pietrzykowski, who lives behind the Subject Property stated that she has a 5 foot high cedar fence and if the Petitioner puts up his fence she would not be able to maintain her fence in the appropriate manner. The Petitioner stated that he would locate his fence 12 inches from his lot line and since the neighbor's fence is 611 off her property line, that would result in an 1811 space between fences for maintenance purposes. The Petitioner also stated that he would provide a gate or removable section of fence so that 1811 area would be accessible. Following discussion on the matter and hearing the neighbors concerns, the Village Board determined that the 51 611 fence height requested was reasonable Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals recommendation Page 6 - September 5, 1989 to grant a variation permitting a 51 611 high fence for the property being the subject of ZBA 47-V-89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem Nays: Floros, Wattenberg Motion carried. ZBA 51-V-89, 128 Waverly Place The Petitioner is requesting a 31 611 side yard instead of the normally required 6.5 feet in order to expand the existing garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granted the request. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 51-V-89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented at the next meeting on September 19th. ZBA 53-V-89, 103 South Edward Street Due to improper notice as to dimensions of the proposed variation, Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to remand this case back to the Zoning Board of Appeals. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 55-V-89, 1707 Myrtle The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit an existing patio enclosure to remain 5.75 feet from the detached garage, rather than the required 10 foot separation required, and to permit a driveway width of 27.75 feet instead of the 21 feet maximum width provided in the Village Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-1. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested provided that appropriate fire -rated drywall be installed in the garage, as approved by the Department of Inspection Services. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Absent: Busse Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting on September 19th. Page 7 - September 5, 1989 ZBA 51-V-89 128 WAVERLY PL ZBA 53-V-89 103 S.EDWARD ZBA 55-V-89 1707 MYRTLE REPEAL An ordinance was presented for first reading that ORD. NO. 4083 repeals Ordinance No. 4083, which provided for the sale of specified property owned by the Village to be sold to the highest bidder at an auction sponsored by the Northwest Municipal Conference in the Arlington Heights Public Works garage on September 16th. It has been determined that due to the large volume of items to be included in this auction that the Village of Mount Prospect would host an auction, to be conducted by the Northwest Municipal conference on October 14th. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Absent: Busse Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4092 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4092. AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 4083 AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF EQUIPMENT OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Absent: Busse Notion carried. SELL PROPERTY An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would authorize the sale of specified personal property owned by the Village through an auction sponsored by the Northwest Municipal Conference. This auction will be held on October 14th at the Public Works facility in Mount Prospect. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ORD. NO. 4093 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4093. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF EQUIPMENT OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented BIDS: Page 8 - September 5, 1989 various bid results: Bids were received for parkway trees; a complete PARKWAY listing of the bids is attached to these minutes. TREES It was the recommendation of the administration that authorization be given to spent the $7,000 budgeted for this program. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, KLEHM NURSERY moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the bid submitted by Charles Klehm & Son Nursery for parkway trees and authorize the budgeted amount of $7,000 for this program. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. The following bid results were presented for the SNOW PLOWS purchase of two replacement snow plows with stainless steel moldboards: Bidder Model Amount Illinois Truck & #2PR459UAX $5,795.00 Equipment Co. Baker/Flink Flink Company #2PR459UAX $6,750.00 Flink Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ILLINOIS accept the low bid submitted by Illinois Truck & TRUCK & Equipment Company for the purchase of two EQUIPMENT CO. stainless steel moldboard snow plows at a cost not to exceed $11,590. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. The following bids were received for the reconstruction RECONSTRUCT of Greenwood Drive and Oneida Lane: GREENWOOD DR. Bidder & ONEIDA IN Amount A & K Construction Co., Inc. $213,632.50 Triggi construction $252,206.90 Vincent Di Vito, Inc. $278,790.00 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved A & K CONST. to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low bid submitted by A & K Construction in the amount of $213,632.50 for the reconstruction of Greenwood Drive and onieda Lane. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 9 - September 5, 1989 FIELD CHANGE A request was presented from the home owner at 54 N. ALBERT 54 North Albert Street, which is a townhouse, to permit the installation of a brick patio. Village Manager John Dixon recommended granting this request. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to grant the requested field change and permit a brick patio to be installed at 54 North Albert Street. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. RAILROAD R.O.W. The following proposals were received to perform IMPROVEMENTS the design, bidding and inspection of the retaining wall at the west computer lot: Bidder Amount Midwest Consulting Engineers $27,700 Brighton Engineering Co. $18,000 Peter F. Olesen & Associates $15,744 Donohue & Associates $10,900 DONOHUE & ASSOC Trrstee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the proposal submitted by Donohue & Associates as a consultant for the railroad right-of- way improvements, retaining wall, for the west commuter lot. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. DOWNTOWN PARKING The following proposals were received to conduct a STUDY parking study with two options, either the entire downtown business 'triangle area' and/or the Emerson Street area: Alternate Alternate Bidder A B Rich & Associates $13,018 $ 2,749 Southfield, Mich. Barton-Aschman $19,300 $13,950 Evanston, Illinois Peter Olesen & Assoc. $24,985 $10,100 Mount Prospect, Ill. Walker Consultants $38,820 $23,500 Elgin, Illinois It was noted that the Plan Commission has reviewed the proposals, as well as representatives from the Mount Prospect Public Library and the First Chicago Bank. The bank and library have offered to pay a portion of the cost of this study. There was discussion among the Board members as to the benefit of such a study and whether it should Page 10 - September 5, 1989 include the entire business district, north of the tracks or just the area immediately adjacent to and including Emerson Street. It was noted by Trustee Corcoran that the Planning and Zoning Department had conducted an inventory of the Emerson Street area Parking and he did not feel another study would provide any additional information. There was also discussion among the Board members as to whether another study was necessary. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved DONOHUE & to accept the proposal submitted by Donohue & Associates ASSOCIATES to conduct a parking study on the entire downtown district 'triangle' (bounded by Northwest Highway & Central Road east to Elm Street). Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Wattenberg, Farley Nays: Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Motion carried. Due to the recurring flood problem in the area of WA PELLA & Wa Pella and Central Road, it was the recommendation CENTRAL RD of the administration to retain a consulting FLOODING engineer to recommend a solution. The following proposals were received for this project: RJN Environmental Associates, Inc. $ 9,600 Harza Engineering company $11,000 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved RJN ENVIRON - to concur with the recommendation of the staff MENTAL ASSOC. and accept the proposal submitted by RJN Environmental Associates, Inc. for the engineering consultants relative to the Wa Pella/Central Road flooding problem. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. The Village Board has been discussing the existing and PUBLIC proposed use of the Public Safety Building, which SAFETY BLDG houses the Fire and Police Departments. The 3rd STUDY Municipal District Court was renting space on the 2nd floor, however, with the new Court House now open in Rolling Meadows, that space previously used by the Court, Village Board meetings and Zoning Board meetings is no longer needed. Staff has requested direction as to what should be done with that space. It was the decision of the Village Board that staff prepare a report on the use of the Public Safety Building, both present and future needs, which report was presented at the Committee of the Whole meeting. It was the opinion of the Village Board that proposals be Page 11 - September 5, 1989 requested for a complete study on the Public Safety facility. The proposals received are as follows: John Victor Frega Associates, Ltd. $43,500 PGA/McDonough $39,700 Applied Design Associates, Ltd. $29,800 Richard Preves and Associates $28,900 Otis Associates, Ltd. $24,900 O'Donnel, Wicklund, Pigozzi & Peterson $24,310 Donohue and Associates $15,900 DONOHUE & ASSOC. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the proposal submitted by Donohue & Associates in the amount of $15,900 to conduct a study of the Public Safety Space Utilization Study. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. SELL PERSONAL An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would PROPERTY authorize the sale of sewer grouting equipment. It was noted by the administration that this is specialized equipment and Visu-sewer Clean and Seal Inc. has expressed interest in purchasing these items. SURPLUS PROPERTY Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to declare the specified grouting equipment as surplus property. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Arthur, seconded by, Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4094 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4094. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SEWER GROUTING EQUIPMENT OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. FOREST AVE The Village is presently undertaking the widening and reconstruction of a portion of Forest Avenue, south of Kensington Road. The administration has stated that a section of the watermain is in need of repair or replacement and recommends repair, rather than Page 12 - September 5, 1989 replacement due to the costs involved. It is the recommendation of the administration that the Village Board authorize waiving the bidding procedure and authorize the necessary watermain repairs of a portion of Forest Avenue to be performed by Joel Kennedy at a cost not to exceed $14,000. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and waive the bidding procedure and authorize Joel Kennedy to repair a portion of the watermain on Forest Avenue. Upon roll ca . 11: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A request was presented from the administration to waive the bidding procedure and authorize Insituform Midwest to perform the necessary sanitary sewer on Briarwood Drive East, Lincoln Easement, and Thayer at a cost not to exceed $71,320. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration to waive the bidding procedure and authorize specified sanitary sewer repairs be made by Insituform Midwest in an amount not to exceed $71,320. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A request was submitted by the administration to increase the contract amount with Insituform Midwest for the sanitary sewer rehabilitation program by $35,320.00, decreasing the contract amounts previously awarded to Joel Kennedy and Visu-Sewers proportionately. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and increase the contract with Insituform Midwest by $35,320 relative to the sanitary sewer rehabilitation project and adjust the other contracts accordingly. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Mr. Dixon stated that re -surfacing the Maple Street and Wille Street parking lots has been completed and those lots are open for use. Trustee Corcoran requested information as to the proposed improvement schedule for Melas Park, noting that he does not want the Mount Prospect Lions Club annual carnival to be displaced in 1990. The Village Manager stated that the Arlington Heights and Mount Prospect Park Districts are still discussing the matter and that he did not expect any disruption of the 1990 July 4th Lions Club Carnival. Page 13 - September 5, 1989 JOEL KENNEDY SANITARY SEWER REPAIRS: LINCOLN system EASEMENT, BRDARWOOD DR. E. THAYER INSITUFORM MIDWEST JULY 4,1990 CARNIVAL: MELAS PARK SITE FIELD CHANGES Trustee Arthur requested the administration to look into the subject of field changes and who can grant field changes and under what circumstances. POWER OUTAGES Trustee Floros requested the administration to look into recurring electrical outages in his general area and ask if Commonwealth Edison could take action to reduce the number of power outages. ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes! Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 9:59 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 14 - September 5, 1989 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT August 1, 1489 - August 31, 1984 Fund Revenues Expenses Fund Balance for for Balance General and Special Revenue Funds July 31, 1989 August, 1989 August, 1984 Aug 31, 1989 General Fund $ 2,509,498 $3,302,146 $1,374,446 $ 4,437,198 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 895,703 77,054 59,607 913,150 Community Development Block Grant Fund 10,184 10,000 68,168 < 47,984> Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund < 128,025> 238,125 42,698 67,402 Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 3,405,074 1,392,969 371,886 4,426,157 Parking System Revenue Fund 205,737 15,842 8,195 213,384 Risk Management Fund 1,014,609 157,824 133,340 1,039,043 Capital Projects Capital Improvement Repl or repair Fund 400,967 249,696 10,295 640,368 Corporate Purpose Improvemen'_ 1989 < 109,679> - 3,302 < 112,981> Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 11985) 319,949 5,378 875 324,452 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) - - _ Debt Service Funds 645,159 519,345 7,288 1,157,216 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund - Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund 13,817,367 15,918,021 143,481 147,500 43,586 13,917,262 Benefit Trust Funds 3,515 53 34,963 16,030,558 - 5,568 $38.908,074 JkAZL9,413 $2,158,649 $43,008,843 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE L ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8131/89 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC•D GENERAL FUND BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL TAX REVENUE 1-UDO-00-400! TAXES -CORPORATE CURRENT 1.410.500 470.164 1-000-00-4002 TAXES -CORPORATE PRIOR 1.767.100 589,032 1.734.756 L.603.773, 1.410e5U0- 1.410.500- 100- 1-000-00-{004 TAXES-GARBAGF CuRRENT 735.600 245.200 32,344- 32.344- 2- 1-JOU-00-4005 TAXES -GARBAGE PRIOR 893.200 2)7.732 818.O1t 756.247 T35s6UD- 735.600- 100- t -U00-00-4010 TAXES-ROEBRDG CURRENT 11.000 3.664 15.189- 15•t89- 2- 1-000-00-4011 TAXES-ROEBROG PRIOR 129000 4.000 129 645 12 11.000- 11.000- LOO - 1-000-00-4013 RETAILERS OCCUPATION TA%5,480.000 1.826.664 1,756,499 e15J 488.453 645 3.723.501- 645 5 1-000-00-4014 SALES TAX -SPECIAL PAYMNT 3.723.501- 66- 1-U00-00-4015 FOREIGN FIRE INS TAx0 23,000 7.664 1-000-00-4016 AUTO RENTAL TAX 750 248 1,603 284 23.OUO- 23.000- 100- 1-000-00-4017 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 150.000 50,000 8'•570 t9:5by 853 67,430- 653 853 114 1-OOU-00-401d FOOD L BEVERAGE TAX 475.000 158.332 183,646 51.815 291.354- b7. 45- I-OUQ-OO-4020 ELECTRONICS GAME TAX 129000 4.000 291.354- 61- 1 -000 -DO -4064 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 12.000- 12.000- 100- 1-000-00-4065 PERSONAL PROP REPL REB 60.853- 265- O TOTAL TAX REVENUE 910.150 3.636,700 4.589,730 1.871,168 0 6.320.420- 6,320. 420- 694 - FEE REVENUE 1-00U-00-4101 BUILOING PERMIT FEES 225,000 75.000 158.901 25.941 66,099- 1-000-00-41OZ ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 45.000 15.000 280010 69357 66,099- 29- 1-000-00-4104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 30.000 I00000 18.272 4.390 16.990- 16.990- 38- 1-000-00-4105 PLAN EXAMINATION FEES 459000 15,000 25.308 4.852 11.728- 11.728- 39- 1-000-00-4106 STREET OPENING FEES 1,000 332 L5U 50 19,692- 19.692- 44- 1-000-00-4107 VEHICLE LICENSE FEES 735.000 245.000 103.77Z 11,964 750- 631.228- 750- 75- 1-000-00-4108 DOG LICENSES 12,500 4.164 1.067 136 6319228- 66- L -000-00-4109 LIQUOR LICENSES 127.500 42.500 1229609 620 11.433- 11,433- 9t - 1-000-00-4110 BUSINESS LICENSES 270,000 90,000 1084091 4.732 4.891- 4,891- 4- 1-000-00-4112 PUBLIC IMPR INSPECTI09S 70.000 23.332 48,314 79152 161.909- 161.909- 60- 1-JO0-00-4113 RENTAL FEES 6.900 2.300 t0,635 1e290 Z1.b86- 21.686- 3t3t - 1-000-00-4114 FEES -BOARD OF APPEALS 15.000 5.000 4,113 1.409 3.735 39735 54 1-000-00-4115 CENTEL FRANCHISE FEES 30.000 10.000 14.667 109887- 10,887- 73- 1-000-00-4116 BELL SYS FRANCHISE FEES 90.000 30.000 29.940 7.502 15,333- 15.333- 51- 1-000-00-4119 ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS 12.000 4.000 5,725 420 60.060- 60,060- 67- 1-000-00-4120 FALSE ALARM FEES T.500 2,500 1.730 295 6.275- 6.275- 52- 1-000-00-4121 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 145.000 48.332 45.59399,407_ 11.545 5.770- 5.770- T7_ ►-000-00-4123 LANDLORD/TE NA N! FEES 40.000 13.332 29,568 1,491 99.407- 69- TOTAL FEE REVENUE 1.907,400 635.792 756.565 90,146 10.432- L. 10,432- 26- 150.835- ►.150,835- 60- INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1-000-00-4150 STATE INCOME TAX L,570.000 523,332 594.170 80,619 975,822- 1-000-00-4151 STATE SALES TAX 100,000 33,332 32.582 8.417 975.822- 62- 1-000-00-y 152 STATE INCOME TAX -SP PMT 65#759 65.759 67.418- 67.418- by - 1-U00-00-41.54 GRANT-SR.CITIZEN TAXI 5.000 1,664 160 65,759 65.759 0 1-000-00-4155 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPD 15,000 5,332 23 4.840- 4.840- 97- 1-000-00-4156 EMPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS 12.000 4s000 2s083 411 Lbs000- 6.917- 16.000- 100- 1-000-00-4159 FLOOD REIMBURSEMENTS 4.917- 83- 1-000-00-4160 RECYCLING GRANT 22.500 0 1-000-00-41.62 GRANT-ICEC POLICE TRGN 209000 6.664 22.500 ZZ.500 O 1-000-00-4163 GRANT -STATE FIRE TRAING 1d.000 6.000 20,000- 209000- t00- 1-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 1559700 51e900 63.029 63,029 1fl,U00- 18.000- 100- 1-000-00-4165 PERSONAL PROP REPL REB 20500 632 275 92,671- 92.671- 60- 275 2.225- 2x225- 89- GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31/84 1489-90 Y -T -O T -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1R899.200 SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 17,500 1-000-00-4175 H E S SERVICE CHARGE LT5,000 1-ODO-00-4180 AMBULANCE TRNSPRT FEE 40,000 TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 2159000 PARKING REVENUE 339218 4.252 1 -000 -UO -4216 FINES - LOCAL 130.000 1-000-00-4Z17 FINES - CIRCUIT COURT 180.000 1-OOU-00-4Zt8 FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES 1,000 TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 311,000 OTHER REVENUE 329,446 324.535 1-000-00-4231 SALE OF CODE BOOKS 1.750 1-000-00-4235 RECYCLING INCOME 50,000 1-ODU-00-4243 SENIOR CENTER REVENUE 5.000 1-000-00-4244 SPECIAL DETAIL REVENUE 10,000 t-000-00-4245 REIMS-SERVICESEPROPERTY 10,000 ►-ODO-00-4246 REIMS - YOUTH COUNSELING 33.000 1-000-00-4247 POLICE E FIRE REPORTS 12,000 1-000-00 4240 INTEREST INCOME 1409000 1-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 30,000 1-000-00-4251 MROT INTEREST DLSTRIBUTN 219000 1-000-00-4253 INTEREST - ESCROW FUND 75.000 L-000-00-4255 FLOOD LOANS INTEREST ZI.400 L-000-00-4256 FLOOD LOANS PRINCIPAL 51,700 1-000-00-4Z6Z RAINY. OF STATE HWYS. 421500 t -000-00-4Z6+, REIMS - CENTRAL ROAD 54.600 L-000-00-4270 TRANS FROM TRUST ACCTS L -JOG -00-4273 SURVEILLANCE REVENUE 633,056 780.566 Ztd.539 58,332 52x500 17,500 13,332 16,563 4000 71,664 69,063 22*000 43,332 49,577 11,058 60,000 339218 4.252 332 225 125 103.664 83.020 209435 UNREC•D BAL ANC E 1.t18,634- t22,500- 23.437 - 145. 9 3 7- 39437- 145.437- 80.423- 146. 78Z- 775- Z27.960 - 80.423- 146.782- 775- 227.960- see 580 697 195 1,053- 16.664 1.734 48,266- 1,664 1.080 3,920- 3,332 2,7Z5 7,275- 3,332 8.720 5,001 1,280- 11.000 5,183 27.817- 4.000 4.047 1,033 7,453- 46.664 90.4Z6 25.418 44,574- L09000 69832 74t 139168- 8,332 109505 3,133 14.495- 25.000 32,734 99669 42,266- 79132 7.244 19472 L4.t56- 179232 34,455 S.T15 L79245 - 149t64 22.268 ZU,232- 18.200 86,530 26.887 31,930 1-000-00-4275 SHARED COST -SIDEWALK 25.000 8,332 18,342 544 1-000-00-4216 SHARED COST -TREE REPLC 53.000 16,664 9.828 50 t-000-00-4277 FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM 10,000 3.332 5,670 1-000-00-4299 GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL UFHER REVENUE 646,950 215,624 349,020 79,658 TUTAL-GENERAL FUND___ _____________ .5.8899700 5,246.500 6,627.964 3.302,146 MOTOR FUEL YAK FUND 6,658- 409t72- 4,330- 297.930- 99261,736 - PAGE 2 BALANCE SAL 1,1I89634- 59- 122.500- 70- 23.437- 54- 145.937- 68- 80,423- 62- 146.782- 82- ITS- T8- Z21.980- 73- 1.053- 60- 48,266- 97- 3.9X- 78- 7.275- 73- 1.280- t3- 2T.Bt7- 84- 1.953- 66- 490574- 35- 23.168- IT- 14,495- 58- 42.266- 56- 14.156- 66- 17.245- 33- 10,232- 48- 31.930 58 0 O 6.658- 27- 40,172- 80- 4.330- 43- U 297.930- 4a- 9,261.736- t57 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 627,748- 627,748- 67- 34.196- 34.196- L14- 39521- 3,521- 12- 665,465- 665,465- 67- ZZ -000-00-4157 M F I ALLOCATION 931.600 310.532 303.852 78,617 22-000-00-4242 REIMBURSEMT ON PROJECTS 30,000 10,000 4.196- 89026- 22 -000 -JO -4245 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FUND 2Z-OOU-00-4248 INTEREST INCOMEO 29,400 4,464 24,879 6,463 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 490.000 329,446 324.535 77,054 1-000-00-4275 SHARED COST -SIDEWALK 25.000 8,332 18,342 544 1-000-00-4216 SHARED COST -TREE REPLC 53.000 16,664 9.828 50 t-000-00-4277 FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM 10,000 3.332 5,670 1-000-00-4299 GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL UFHER REVENUE 646,950 215,624 349,020 79,658 TUTAL-GENERAL FUND___ _____________ .5.8899700 5,246.500 6,627.964 3.302,146 MOTOR FUEL YAK FUND 6,658- 409t72- 4,330- 297.930- 99261,736 - PAGE 2 BALANCE SAL 1,1I89634- 59- 122.500- 70- 23.437- 54- 145.937- 68- 80,423- 62- 146.782- 82- ITS- T8- Z21.980- 73- 1.053- 60- 48,266- 97- 3.9X- 78- 7.275- 73- 1.280- t3- 2T.Bt7- 84- 1.953- 66- 490574- 35- 23.168- IT- 14,495- 58- 42.266- 56- 14.156- 66- 17.245- 33- 10,232- 48- 31.930 58 0 O 6.658- 27- 40,172- 80- 4.330- 43- U 297.930- 4a- 9,261.736- t57 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 627,748- 627,748- 67- 34.196- 34.196- L14- 39521- 3,521- 12- 665,465- 665,465- 67- ZZ -000-00-4157 M F I ALLOCATION 931.600 310.532 303.852 78,617 22-000-00-4242 REIMBURSEMT ON PROJECTS 30,000 10,000 4.196- 89026- 22 -000 -JO -4245 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FUND 2Z-OOU-00-4248 INTEREST INCOMEO 29,400 4,464 24,879 6,463 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 490.000 329,446 324.535 77,054 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31/89 1989-90 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC00 L BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL TOTAL MOTOR FUEL -TAX FUND 990.000 329,996 324.535 77.054 665,1#65- 665,46s- 67 - COMMUNITY OEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT 467.992 1,4630980- L.463.980- 39-000-00-4037 TAXES - IMRF 185,000 61,664 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 100- 39-000-00-4038 TAXES - MAINT G REPAIR 127,300 42,432 127.300- 185.000- 23-000-00-4L55 CDBG GRANT 23-ODU-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 515,950 10,000 525,950 Ili, 980 30332 175,312 70.000 8.406 780406 LOsUOU lU,U00 4450950- 1,594- 447.544- 445.950- 1,594- 447,544- 86- 16 - 85 - DEVLPMT BLOCK -GkANT -�_-_524.950 TOTAL COMMUNITY- - 601,792 175,322 780406 L0.000 447.544- 441,544- 85 - ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND TAX REVENUE 24-U00-00-4055 TAXES - CURRENT 245.900 82.964 248,900- 248,900- 100- 24-000-00-4056 TAXES - PRIOR 262.000 87.332 257.170 237.752 40830- 49830- 2- 24-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 45.000 15.000 45.000- 45,000- 100- 24-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 600 200 393 373 207- 207- 35- iJTAI TAX REVENUE 556.500 ISS9496 257.563 238.125 298,937- 298*937- 54- TOTAL- ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 556,500 1d5,496 257,563 238,125 2980437- 298,437- 54 - LIBRARY FUND TAX REVENUE 39-000-00-4031 TAXES - LIBRARY St,tVICESt,4639980 467.992 1,4630980- L.463.980- 39-000-00-4037 TAXES - IMRF 185,000 61,664 185,000- 100- 39-000-00-4038 TAXES - MAINT G REPAIR 127,300 42,432 127.300- 185.000- 100- 39-000-00-4039 TAXES -INSURANCE C AUDIT 29.120 9.704 L27,300- L00- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1.805,400 601,792 29,120- 1,805.400- 29.120- 100 - 1*805,400- 100 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 39-000-00-4157 STATE GRANT 529280 17.424 39-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 29.300 9,764 52,280- 52,280- 100-',. TJTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 81,580 27.188 29,300- 29,300- 100- 81,580- 81,580- 100 - PARKING REVENUE 39-000-00-4216 FINES AND FORFEITS 40,000 13.332 39-OOU-00-4246 INTEREST INCOME 40,000 139332 40.000- 40.000- 100- 39-000-00-4254 OTHER INCOME 252,420 849140 40.000- 40,000- 100- TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 332.420 110,804 2520420- 2520420- 100 - 332.420- 332,420- 100- TOTAL LIBRARY FUN- 2.219.400 734r784 - ----- _-_- 29219.400- 29219.400- 100 - MATER 6 SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 4i-000-00-4UL9 TAXES - CURRENT 41-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 41-000-00-4157 GRANT - P M SEWER 41-000-00-4201 WATER SALES 41-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES 4i-000-00-4204 METER RENTAL 4t-000-00-4205 WATER G SEWER TAPS 41-ODU-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 4t-000-00-4245 JAWA REIMBURSEMENTS 41-000-00-4246 JAWA INCOME 41-000-00-4247 JAWA INTEREST 41-U00-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 41 -000 -GO -4249 MISCELLANEOUS 41-000-00-4280 SALE OF PROPERTY 41-000-00-4289 GATN/LOSS SALE OF ASSETS 41-000-00-4290 GAIN CNV SALE OF INVEST. 41-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 41 -OCU -00-4299 WATER CLEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL RF TOTAL WATER C SEWER FUND PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8!31/89 1989-90 Y -T -U Y -T -O CUR Ma BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 732.I00 244.032 873.600 291.200 874.004 819.768 25*000 8#332 14.060 2.870 1.630*700 543.564 888*064 822#636 572,100 190.700 3.648*000 1-216.000 1,364.637 42t.865 352,000 117.332 128.587 34,812 50,000 16.664 23.574 6.495 20,000 6.664 1Z.748 3*076 65,000 21.664 82.696 17.800 2i*000 8.332 9,539 1,189 200000 6.664 680 45,23Z 45*232 204,600 680200 89,556 24.4Z1 20,000 6,664 IB#243 9.441 55,000 18,332 VFNUE "*031.700 I-677#216 1,7759492 570,331 6*662,400 2,220,780 29663*556 1*392.969 FEE REVENUE 46 -000 -OD -4113 RENTAL - DEPOT TOTAL FEE REVENUE PARKING REVENUE 46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION UNIT 8I 46-000-00-4212 METER COLLECTION -UNIT 02 46-000-00-4213 SPACE RENT WILLE ST -LOT 46-000-00-4243 PARKING STUDY REIMS 46-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL PARKING REVENUE TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND ------------- RISK MANAGEMENT FUND UNREC•O BALANCE 732,100- 404 10*940- 742*636- 572.100- 2e283*363- 223.4L3- 26,426- 7.252- 17,696 I5.461- 19,3Z0 - 45,Z32 115.044- 1#757- 55,000- 3,256:208- 3,998.844- PAGE 4 x BALANCE SAL 732*100- 100- 404 O 10.940- 44- 742%636- 46- 572.100- 200- 2.283.363- 63- 223*413- 63- 26.426- 53- 7..52- 36- 17,696 27 15.461- 62- 19,320- 97- 0 45.232 0 115,044- 56- 1,757- 9- 55,000- 100-- 0 0 0 0 3*256,208- 65- 3.998.844- 60- .2,880 960 1*200 24D L.680- 11680- 58- 2.880 960 1,200 240 1*680- t*680- 58- 82,000 27.332 27,6414 70267 54,356- 54.346- 66- 66,000 229000 219 361# 5#865 44.636- 44,636- 68- 9*600 3,200 20850 900 6.750- 6,750- 70- 15,000 14*520 5.000 4,840 7,010 1,550 15,000- 15*000- t00- 187*120 62*3T2 58,868 15,602 7,510- 128,252- 7,510- 52- 128*252- 69- 190,000 63*332 60,068 15.842 129*952- 229.932- 68- SLRVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4176 GENERAL FUND CHARGES 1.077x230 359,016 323,167 101*729 754*043- 754#043- 70- 49-000-06-4177 WATER FUND CHARGES 172.600 57*532 51,780 17,26U 120.820- L20,820- TO- 49-ODU-00-4178 PARKING FUND CHARGES 3.300 I,lOO 990 330 2,310- 2:310- 70- RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4241 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4242 RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4243 LIBRARY CONTRIBUTIONS 49-030-00-4244 FLEXCOMP CONTRtBUTIONS 49-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 49-000-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 49-000-00-4249 INTEREST - GTE FJTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVE"!UE TOTAL RISK PM NAGIHENT FUND ------------------------- CAPITAL IMPRY. L REPL. FUND TAX REVENUE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENOINC 8131/69 1969-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PAGE 5 UNREC•O S BALANCE BALANCE BAC 69.000 23.000 20.987 8.096 48,013- 48.013- 70- 829000 27.332 31.263 3.005 SO.TL7- 50.717- 62- 691000 234000 31.411 IL,692 37.589- 37,589- 54- 6020 2,LC4 29435 607 3.885- 3.885- 61- 25.000 8,332 4.941 2,500 20,059- 20,059- 80- 870000 Z9,000 31,029 9.105 55.971- 55,971- 64- 5,500 19596.950 1,832 532.308 498,043 157,824 5,500- 1,098,907- 5,500- 100- 33,442 52-ODO-00-4268 HISTORICAL SOCIETY OONTN 30.000 10,000 7,433 I,098,907- 69- 1.596.950 532,308 498.043 157.824 1,0989907- 1,098,907- 69- 51-000-00-4016 TAXES - CURRENT 179.400 59,800 51-000-00-4017 TAXES - PRIOR 233.900 77.964 229.616 ti2.278 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 413.300 137,764 229,616 212.278 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 51-000-00-4226 TRANS - GENERAL FUND 250.000 83.332 51-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 30,000 109000 199314 3,976 51-O0O-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT 2,500 832 51-000-00-4263 SALE OF P.H. EQUIPMENT 15.000 5.000 51-000-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT 40.000 13.332 51-000-00-426? DEVELOPER DONATION 96.000 32.000 79,652 33,442 52-ODO-00-4268 HISTORICAL SOCIETY OONTN 30.000 10,000 7,433 TOTAL INTERFUND TRAMSFERS 4639500 154.496 106,399 37.418 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND 8769800 292,260 336.015 249,696 CORPORATE PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV OTHER REVENUE 53-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS -SERIES A 1,000,000 333.332 53-000-00-4243 SALE OF PONDS -SERIES B 500,000 166,664 53-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 40,000 13.332 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 1.540,000 5139328 TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 1969 IMPRV 195409000 513.328 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST L987 OTHER REVENUE 54-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1,500 29500 4.238 IT9,400- 4,284- 18 3, 68 4- 250,000- 10.686- Z.500- 15,OOD- 40,000- 16.348- ZZ.56T- 357,1G1- 54U,T85- 1,000,000- 500,000- 409000- 19540.000- 1,540,000- 3,262- 179,400- 100- 4,284- 2- 183,684- 44- 250,000- 100- [0,686- 36- 2,500- 100- 15.000- 100- 409000- 100- 46.348- 17- 22.567- 75- 357,(01- T7- 540,785- 62- 19000.000- 100- 500.00G- loo- 40.000- 100- 1.540,000- 100- 19540.000- L00- 39262- 43- TJTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1987 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31189 1989-90 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET EiTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 7.500 2.500 4*238 7.500 20500 4.238 FEE REVENUE 55-000-00-4114 RENTAL INCOME 9*000 55-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 55-ODU-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 20,000 TOTAL FEE REVENUE 29,000 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 29,000 CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E 11973 TAX REVENUE 60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 60-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 60-OUO-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 60-000-00-4248 INTFRFST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 0 C I 1973 CORPORATE PURPOSES B E 1 1974 TAX REVENUE 61-000-03-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 61-000-00-4023 TAXES - PRIOR 61-ODO-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 61-000-00-4Z48 INTEREST INCOME TafAL TAX REVENUE TUTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E 11974 SSA 81 PROSPECT MEADOWS B E I TAX REVENUE 62-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 6Z-UOU-00-4026 TAXES - PRIOR 62-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TUTAL SSA Ot PROSPECT NEADnWS 8 E I UNREC•0 BALANCE 3.262- 3,262 - PAGE 6 X BALANCE 8AL 3.262- 43- 3.262- 43 - 3*000 4.797 20547 4.203- 4#203- 47- 6.864 .105 2x831 7.295- 7:295- 0 36- 9,664 17,502 59378 11,498- t1s498- 40- 9,664 7.502 5.378 11,498- 110498- 40- 729600 69,200 24.200 23#064 67,932 62.803 TZ*600- 72,600- 100- 5.400 1.800 1#215 300 1,268- L.268- 2- 10,000 3.332 49095 1,051 5.400- 5,905- 5.400- 5,905- 100- 59- 15T,200 529396 72,027 63.860 85,173- 85,I73- 54- 157,200 52.396 72,021 63,860 85.173- 85,LT3- 54- 97,300 32,432 126.800 42,264 124.545 115.141 7,200 2,400 20,000 6:664 7,755 19985 251,300 83,/60 132,300 117.126 251.300 63.760 132,300 117.126 9 T, 3U U- 2,255- 7,200- 12*245- 119,000- t19*000- 97.300- 100- Z,255- 2- 7:200- 100- 12.245- 61- 119.000- 47- 119.000- 4T- 11,300 119150 3,764 3,716 10,438 10,422 11,300- 11.300- 100- 2,750 916 1#215 300 T12- TLZ- 6- 25.200 8,396 11,653 10,7ZZ 1.535- 13,547- 1.535- 56- L3.547- 54- 25, Z00 8,396 11,653 10,72Z 13,547- 13,547- 54- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31/89 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC'D Y BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL SSA 22 BLACKHA4K d E t TAX REVENUE 63-000-00-4028 TAXES - CURRENT 63-000-00-4029 TAXES - PRIOR 63-030-00-4248 INTERtST INCOME TOIAL TAX REVENUE 15,200 18.600 2.700 35,500 5,064 6.200 900 12.164 16.819 1,152 17#971 14.690 302 14.992 15.200- 1.781- 1.548- 18,5Z9- 15:200- 19781- 1.548- 18.529- IOQ- 10- 57- 51 - 1-TOTALSSAd23LACKHAMK9 TOTAL SSA 22 3LACKHAWK 9E I- ---`-- 36.500 12,164 17,971 14,992 18.9- 52 189529- 51 - CORPORATE PURPOSES B C I 1989A INTERFUND TRANSFERS 64-000-00-4228 TRANS - 1969A IMPRV TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 35,000 359000 11.664 119664 35.000- 35.000- 35.000- 35e000- 100 - 100- TOTAL -CORPORATE -PURPOSES B t -I 1989As� 359000 lt,664 35.000- 35.000- too - CORPORATE PURPOSES B C 119898 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 65-000-00-4227 TRANS - GENERAL FLNO TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 15,000 15,000 5.000 5.000 15,000- 159000- 15.000- 15.000- 100- 100- TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B G -I 19898-®� - 15.000 5,000 15.000- 15.000- 100 - INSURANCE RESERVE B E I TAX REVENUE 66-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 66 -ODD -00-h020 TAXES - PRIOR 66-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE 44.900 SB, 500 6,400 109.800 14,964 19.500 2.132 36.596 57#406 3.113 60,519 53#071 666 53.737 44,900- 1.094- 30287- 49,281- 44.900- 1,094- 3.287- 49,2d1- L00- 2- 51 - 45 - TOTAL -INSURANCE RESERVE -B 6 I®----��'-109.800 36,596 600519 53.737 49.2b1- 49.281- 45 - DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 E 1 1987D TAX REVENUE 68-030-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 68-000-00-4039 SALES TAX INCREMENT 37,500 129500 34,112 1T.740 3,388- 39388_ 9- T3TAL TAX REVENUE 379500 129500 34,112 1T,7400 3.388- 3.388- 9- OUWNTUWN REOEYL►MT B E 119870 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 68-ODU-00-4224 TRANS - D/T CONST L981D 68-ODO-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 68-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL DOWNTOWN RLDEVLPMT B L 119870 P W FACILITY 8 L I 19.878 TAX REVENUE 69-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 69-030-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS 69-000-00-4221 TRANS - CIRR FUND 69-ODU-00-4248 INTERtST INCOME 69-U00-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL P W FACILITY B L 119878 DOWNTOWN REOEWLPMT 8 E 11967C VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8131189 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACIUAL PAGE 8 UNREC•D % BALANCE BALANCE BAL 76.750 25.580 57.000 19.750- 19,750- t42.70U- 250 80 126 126 124- 124- 50- 770000 25#660 57.iZb0 126 L9.874- 19,874- 26- 1i4.5U0 38.160 91.238 11.866 23,26[- Z3,Z62- 20- 142#700 24[.600 47#564 80.864 238.154 220.172 142.100- t42.70U- 100- 385.300 118#428 238.154 220.172 4.446- 147,146- 4#446- 2- 26,536 1000000- 1009004- 140- 71-000-00-4164 147.146- 38- 93,750 31,248 93.750 27.703 27,703 7T0 71-000-00-4243 5,000 19664 6#983 2.2460 1,983 1,963 40 989750 32.912 100,733 2.2460 19983 19983 2 484.050 L619340 3389881 222.418 145,163- 145.t63- 30- INTERFUND TRANSFERS 70-000-00-4224 TRANS - D/T CONST 1987C 29,500 9.832 14.323 15.178- 15,117- 5t- 10 -00U-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 50 t6 50- 5Q- 100- 70-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME TUTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERSO 29#550 9.846 149323 15.228- 15.227- 52- TULAL®0UWNTOWN REIIEVLPMT 8 L 11987[---A- 299550 9.848 14.323 15.226 159227- 52 - POLICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 7i-000-00-4049 TAXES - CURRENT 100,000 33.332 7L-000-00-4050 TAXES - PRIOR 1#000 332 28.703 26,536 1000000- 1009004- 140- 71-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 119000 3.664 27.703 27,703 7T0 71-000-00-4243 POLICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS 213,000 719000 74.067 199450 L19000- 119000- 100- 71-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME t,200,000 4099000 410,843 97,494 t389933- 138,933- 65- 71-000-00-4249 OTHER 789,157- 789#157- 66- 71-000-03-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INYESTMT I 8.750 1 1 1 0 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1#5259000 508.328 522,364 1439481 6,750 8,750 0 1.002#636- 1.002,636- 66- VILLAGE OF ESTIMATED MOUNT PROSPECT REVENUE REPORT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING V31/89 POLICE PENSION FUND -------__,�.--� 1989-90 BUDGET ir525,O00 Y-T-D ESTIMATE 508.328 Y-T-O ACTUAL 522,364 CUR MG ACTUALTOTAL 143#481 UNREC-0 BALANCE 1#002.636- BALANCE 19002,636- % 8111 66- FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 72-000-00-4052 TAXES - CURRENT 72-000-00-4053 TAXES-PRIOR 50.000 16,664 509000- 50x000- 100- 72-000-00-4243 FIREMEN'S CONTRtBUT10N5 7Z-000-00-4249 INTEREST INCOME 72-000-00-4244 OTHER 207*000 194009000 69#004 466x66; 71s721 474s626 16,252 132.090 135,279- 925*374- 1359279- 925*374- 0 65- 66- 72-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT12#268 TOTAL TAX REVENUE t.657.000 552,328 558x615 842- 147.500 12x268 1.098.385- i2,268 1.098,385- 0 0 bb- TOTAL -FIREMEN*S- PENSION -FUND -_--�- 1.657.000 552,328 548,615 147,500 1,098,385- 1,098x385- 66- SSA 03 BUSSE-WILLE B E I TAX REVENUE 88-000-OD-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 88-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 88-UDD-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE 375 125 500 124 ;0 164 370 122 442 3665- 29 395 3- 8- 5- 3- 8- 0 1_ 2- 2- -TOTALSSA TOTAL SSA03-BUSSE--WILLE-8 C I---- 500 164 492 3952- SSA 04 BUSSE-WILLE B E I TAX REVENUE 89-00U-OU-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 89-000-00-40ZO TAXES - PRIOR7 69-030-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TOTAL TAX REVENUE 400 400 132 132 371 378 92 92 7 29- 22- 7 29- 22- 0 0 7- 6- TOTAL- SSA -04-BUSSE-WILLE 8 C-I 400 132 378 92 2Z- 22- 6- SSA 96 GEORGE/ALBERT 8 E I TAX REVENUE 94-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 94-UDO-00-4020 TAXES-PRIOR 94-000-UO-4248 INTEREST INCOME 94-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME 15,400 31.950 LOD 5.132 109648 32 925 299742 339 925 170039 173 14.475- 2 209- 234 14.475- 2,208- 239 239 44- 7- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 47.450 15.812 31,006 18*137169445- 16.444- 35- TOTA. SSA 06 GEORGE/ALBERT 6 L I 47,450 15.812 31,006 18.137 169445- 16,444- 35- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8131/89 1984-90 T—T—U Y—T—D CUR NO UNR£Ca0 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE FLOOD LOAN B G I INTERFUND TRANSFERS 95—ODO-00—#227 TRANSFER GENERAL FUND 43.725 1#.572 14x575 29.150— T3TAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 43.725 149512 1#,575 29.150— TOTALFLOODLOC—I—M------------— 43.725 t4r572 149575 -------- — ---- 29.150— tUTAL ALL FUNDS 259616.375 129734.238 119871,920 6.259,360 22.882.139— PAGE 10 t BALANCE BAL 29.150— 6T - 29.t50— 67- 29.150— 6T- 89- 22.882.137— V1LLA(,t OF MUUNI PRUSPELI BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERI00 04 ENDING 8/31/89 PAGE 11 < UNEXPENDED UNENCUM Y BALANCE ENCUMHEREO BALANCE BAL 11,500 11,500 66 13.766 1 t3,765 42 44 44 1 25.310 1 25.309 47 4.025 4,OZ5 96 85 85 57 49110 4,110 95 Z9,420 I 29.419 51 90.751 10,810 303 1,000 102,8b4 101,438 101,438 38.945 15,237 14- 54,168 250,000 250,000 508.470 46,053 12.909 7.791 7.730 74.483 74,483 49,513 90.751 64 10.810 71 303 24 1.000 100 102,864 65 101.438 72 101,438 72 38.945 94 15,235 55 14- 5- 54,166 78 2500000 100 250.000 IUD 508,468 82 46,053 68 12.909 53 7,T91 66 7.730 100 74,483 67 74,483 67 49,513 12 1989-90 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 17.500 5.831 6,000 1.501 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,750 100908 18,984 1,193 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3.650 1,216 3,606 413 TOTAL MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 53,900 17.956 28.590. 3,107 ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4,175 1.384 L50 75 TOTAL COMMODITIES 150 48 65 59 TOTAL ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSI 4.325 1,432 215 134 TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIV1S10N ------------------------------------------ 5+1.225 19,388 2".805 3,241 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES t41,660 47,212 50.909 tZ.453 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15,190 5.056 4.3d0 215 TOTAL COMMODITIES 19250 416 947 511 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.000 332 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1599100 53,016 56.236 13,179 LEGAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRA=TUAL SERVICES 140.000 46,664 38,562 3,117 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES 14'3,000 46.664 38,562 3.117 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT L TRAINING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 41,250 13,744 2,305 Sl4 TOTAt CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 27,750 9,228 12.515 41085 TOTAL COMMODITIES 300 100 314 190 TOTAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT G TRAIN 69,300 23,072 15,134 4,789 SALARY ADMINISTRATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 250,000 83,332 TOTAL SALARY ADMINISTRATION 253,000 83,332 VILLAGE MANAGER -S TOTAL----------------------------- 206,084 109,93? 21,085 CABLE TV OPERATIONS CABLE TV OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL 68,100 22,692 22.047 4,411 SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 24.260 8.072 11,351 3.764 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1t,720 79730 3,904 2,576 3.929 720 TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS 111.810 37.244 37,3Z7 8,895 TOTAL -CABLE -TV -OPERATIONS ----------------1110810 37.244 37,327 89895 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 68,700 22,892 19,187 4,274 PAGE 11 < UNEXPENDED UNENCUM Y BALANCE ENCUMHEREO BALANCE BAL 11,500 11,500 66 13.766 1 t3,765 42 44 44 1 25.310 1 25.309 47 4.025 4,OZ5 96 85 85 57 49110 4,110 95 Z9,420 I 29.419 51 90.751 10,810 303 1,000 102,8b4 101,438 101,438 38.945 15,237 14- 54,168 250,000 250,000 508.470 46,053 12.909 7.791 7.730 74.483 74,483 49,513 90.751 64 10.810 71 303 24 1.000 100 102,864 65 101.438 72 101,438 72 38.945 94 15,235 55 14- 5- 54,166 78 2500000 100 250.000 IUD 508,468 82 46,053 68 12.909 53 7,T91 66 7.730 100 74,483 67 74,483 67 49,513 12 FINANCE DEPARTMcNT AUMINISTRATIUN AND SUPPORT TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL AOMINTSTRATION AND SUPPORT ACCOUNTING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL ACCOUNTING PURCHASING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL PURCHASING ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL ELECTRONIC DATA PROLESSING DUPLICATING SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIrS TOTAL DUPLICATING SERVICES TELEPHONE SERVICE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL INSURANCE CUSTOMER SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICES CASH MANAGEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CASH MANAGEMENT NUN -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL StRVKC S VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31/89 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 63.420 21#124 15.863 4.690 51250 1.744 1.479 92 3,000 1.000 140,370 46.760 36.529 9.056 82.575 3.400 500 86.475 21,500 500 1,700 23.700 d8,OOO 79000 5.000 39,300 139.300 Z!, 000 7.5UO 29.500 18.900 44.500 2.500 65,900 27.520 1,128 164 28:812 7.164 164 564 7,892 Z9. 324 2.332 1.664 13.100 46,420 7,332 2.500 9,832 6,300 14#832 832 21,964 31.283 357 124 31,764 0.722 101 8,823 19#978 12, 5Z`5 330 39,300 72#133 6.783 so 38 6.871 2.821 2,82L 1*797 1.375 330 4.502 7.190 140 2.593 949 9.763 1,089 7*605 2.420 179069 3.672 24.674 6,092 26,700 8,896 9.895 424,200 141,400 12T,260 450,900 150,296 137.155 80.400 26096 3U#882 29.000 9,664 3.657 7,150 2.376 713 116#550 38,836 35.252 Z ,8Z5 7#6J4 81710 220815 79604 8.710 Z. 500 832 Z,199 42,420 44.619 6#822 473 644 1,939 1.929 1,929 PAGE 12 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAC 47.557 4T.557 75 3.771 14 3,757 72 3*000 3.UOO t00 103.841 14 103.827 74 51,292 51.292 bZ 3,043 3 3,040 89 3T6 3T6 T5 549711 3 54, 7U8 63 12,778 12.778 59 500 500 t00 1,599 t,599 94 14,877 14,877 63 68.022 68,022 17 5.525- 55 59580- 80- 4,670 49670 93 0 67.167 55 679112 48 14,810 14*810 67 4,907 19 4.d88 65 19.717 19 19.698 67 119295 L1.295 60 27,431 279431 62 21500 2.500 100 41*226 41,226 63 16,505 16,805 63 296.940 Z96#940 70 313#745 313,745 7O 49.518 49,518 62 25.343 Z5.343 B7 0"437 6,437 90 81.298 81,298 TO 14,115 149115 62 L4,115 14.115 62 2,500 2.500 t00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOU 04 ENDING 8/31/89 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES 19.150 Z9.L50 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 43.725 14.572 14.575 TOTAL NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE 46,225 15.404 14.575 TOTAL FINANCEDEPARTMENT----------------1.121.745 - - 91 373.820 379.398 VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE 36,134 36.134 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 19980 23.657 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 55.150 18.376 191016 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31.520 10.496 7.863 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3.500 1.164 31,218 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 90.170 30.036 30.097 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 3.750 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4L.250 13.748 16.502 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3.750 1.248 L4.185 TOTAL VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 45.000 14.996 16.502 VILLAGECLERK-S- OFFICE-------�`-135.170 TOTAL- - 1.0259020 45.032 46.599 RISK MANAGEMENT 1339340 1.025.020 352 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 66 133040 1.025,020 TOTAL CONTRA.TUAL SERVICES 1.551.500 517.156 526,480 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1.551.5,)0 517,156 526.480 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT --------------------------------------- 1.551.500 517.156 516,480 INSPECTION SERVICES 348 7.698 INSPECTION SERVICES 85 1.009 4,491 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 319.905 106,256 113,930 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL StRVICES 69.530 23.160 16.945 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9,250 3,068 1.352 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5.500 19828 1.009 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 403,085 1349312 133.236 ENGINEERING SERVICES 5,543 85 2.142 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL 253.250 84.396 93,097 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 44,650 14.866 46.626 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 69500 7.500 2.164 2.496 957 TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 3119900 103.914 2.3L4 142,994 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES --- T14,985 238.236 276.230 POLICE DEPARTMENT 96.078 66 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 7.320 7:3za TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 427.165 142,360 142,373 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 146.000 48.652 49,922 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10.000 3,332 2.680 PAGE 13 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM Y BALANCE E14CUMBERED BALANCE BAL 19.150 Z9.L50 67 319650 31.650 68 84,9ld 742.347 91 742.256 66 4.276 36,134 36.134 66 19980 23.657 23.657 75 1.586 282 282 8 7.844 60,073 60.073 67 6.341 24.748 24.748 130 3.750 3.750 LOO 6.341 28.498 28.498 63 L4.185 88.51`1 88.571 66 133.340 1.0259020 352 1.024,668 66 1339340 1.025.020 352 1.014,668 66 133040 1.025,020 352 1.024,669 66 25,364 204,875 204,875 64 5.737 52,585 2 52,583 76 348 7.698 7.898 85 1.009 4,491 4.491 82 329458 269.849 2 269,847 67 21.433 160,153 160,153 63 18,235 1.976- 736 2,712- 6- 249 5.543 5,543 85 2.142 5.Ia6 5.186 64 429U59 168,906 736 1689170 54 749517 438,T55 T38 4381017 61 28,666 284,792 284,792 67 12.441 96.078 96.078 66 483- 7.320 7:3za 73 VILLAGE OF NOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8!31/89 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO POLICE DEPARTME BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL NT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 4*605 4*605 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITURFS 5*000 L*664 395 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 588.165 196*008 195*370 PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 1.504.149 64 17.707 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,336.290 778.740 632.141 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 243.520 31,166 118.640 TOTAL COMMODITIES 29.300 9*428 7*026 TOTAL PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMEZ*608.110 869,336 957.807 CRIME PREV., PUBLIC AND TUUTH SERV. 77*230 76 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES IOt*540 33.836 24*310 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,820 4,932 1,766 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3*350 IV LIZ 225 TOTAL CRIME PRE -V., PUBLIC AND YOUT 119,710 39*880 26,301 INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PROGRAM 285.8ZO 285,820 TUTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 425*T90 L41,904 139.970 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,620 12.536 11,232 TOTAL COMMODITIES 2*000 664 402 TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE P 465,410 155,104 151.604 CROSSING GUARDS 43,044 43,044 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 52,000 17,332 8.956 TOTAL COMMODITIES 500 164 43,544 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS 521500 17,496 8,956 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS 32,338 69 TOTAL FERSONAI SFRVICES 46.585 15,524 14,Z47 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 83,410 26,792 30.163 TOTAL COMMODITIES 118.200 39,396 46,555 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 251.700 63.892 224.631 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTEMANCE 6 OPER 496.895 165.604 315,596 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT -------------------------------------- 4,330.790 1,443,428 !*655,634 FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 16,629 176,284 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 68 2.113 30.677 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 258,755 86,228 82,471 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 46#300 15,416 15.625 TOTAL COMMODITIES 32.150 !0,712 9.372 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 15,700 5,228 2,517 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 352,905 117.584 109,985 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 1,762.316 65 18.926 TOTAL PERSONAL SFRVICES 2,702,030 900,660 939.7[4 TOTAL CONTRAZTUAL SERVICFS 210,890 70,288 67,416 TOTAL COMMODITIES IZ*150 4,040 1*859 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 93,155 31.036 14,126 TOTAL FI?E DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 3.018*225 1,006,024 1,023*115 PAGE 14 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE RAL 70 4*605 4*605 92 4J.d94 392.795 392.795 67 225.592 tvSO4,149 1.504.149 64 17.707 ,124.880 124.880 51 19.351- 21.274 1 21.273 75 223.948 1.650.303 1 1.650.302 63 6.263 TT,230 77*230 76 51Z 13.054 13,054 Be 376- 3,125 3.t25 93 6.459 93,409 93,409 78 4J,326 285.8ZO 285,820 67 3*272 26.388 26,388 70 3#984- 1.598 1,596 80 39,614 313,806 313.806 67 43,044 43,044 83 500 Soo too 43,544 43,544 83 3.283 32.339 32,338 69 12.818 50*247 50,247 62 11.644 71.645 3 71.642 6t 27,070 124 26,945 It 27*745 131*300 127 181.172 36 338#660 2#675*t57 128 2.675,028 62 16,629 176,284 1T6,284 68 2.113 30.677 10 30,665 66 403 22,TTB 16 22.702 It 13,184 t0 t3*173 84 t9*t45 242,923 96 242,824 69 203,519 1.762,316 1,762.316 65 18.926 143,474 2 143.472 68 t38 10,291 10.291 85 31206 791029 205 78,824 85 225*789 t,995,110 207 1,994,903 66 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31/89 1989-90 Y -T -D T -T -O CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM ; FIRE G EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. BUDGET ESTIRATE ACTUAL ACTUAL. BALANCE ENCUMBERED SALANCt SAL FIRE PREVENTION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 201v095 32.865 67.012 66.195 15.486 134.900 134,900 67 TOTAL COMMODITTES 4,770 10,940 1.580 8.969 1,S34 4.273 23.897 23.896 73 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 49650 1.548 3,616 t42 24 39236 1 3,235 68 TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION 243.380 61.080 80.314 19,925 1.034 1.034 22 163.067 1 t63,065 67 COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31.500 10,500 9,900 4.138 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9.460 3.152 21,600 Z6 21.574 68 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 43,960 13,652 9.900 4.138 9.460 9,460 100 31.060 26 31,034 76 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62.355 20,776 19.841 4,514 42.514 4Z,514 68 TOTAL COMMODITIES 23,585 7.860 7,942 29798 15,643 15,643 66 TOTAL CAPITAL EXP6NOITURES 44.000 580760 14.664 19.584 17,490 14,110 39623 26.,10 26.510 60 i0IA1 DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 63.750 21,248 54,450 40 44,650 15 41.635 76 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPER 252.450 84.132 113,833 !0,475 9,300 9.300 15 138, 47 15 138.602 SS EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,000 19000 923 231 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3.790 1.260 138 9 2.177 2,077 69 TOTAL COMMODITIES 850 280 6LT 30T 3,652 39652 96 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 6v765 2,252 660 556 233 233 27 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 14,405 4.792 2,338 1,103 6,LO5 t0 6,095 90 t2.06T 10 LZv057 84 TOTAL PROTECTION 1,307.264 1,339,485 281,075 2.582.844 355 _FIRE-t-EMEkGENCY- -DEPT. --3.922,325 2.582.485 66 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE POLICE L FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 374,160 124.720 115,540 31.385 248.620 TOTAL POLICE F FIRE DISPATCH SERVI 3T4,160 124.120 125,540 31,385 248,620 66 2491620 248.620 66 TOTAL CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE 124.720 125.540 31.385 248.620 - - ------- ��_374.160 249,620 66 HUMAN SERVICES OTVISION INFORMATION. REFERRAL. E COUNSELING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 74,880 26.280 27,073 6.292 51,807 51.807 66 TOTAL COMMODITIES 23,760 3.400 7.906 6v690 1.867 17 070 17.070 T2 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.900 1,128 964 3,185 747 2.495 Its 215 6 TOTAL INFURMATIUN, REFERRAL, 6 COU 108,940 36.280 37,695 10,644 2.153 2.153 T4 71.245 71.245 65 RECREATION AND EDUCATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,850 4.Z80 4,827 19078 8, 023 023 8:023 62 TOTAL RECREATION AND EDUCATION 1.650 149500 548 4.828 1.304 6.136 270 1,348 341 21 8.364 8.364 58 HOMEBOUND SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 44,655 14.880 16,646 3.718 24,009 28.009 63 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8131/89 1989-90 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM ; HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION BUDGET ESTIMATE AC TO AL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL HUMEBOUND SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.150 5.048 4.870 2.013 10,280 TOTAL HUMEBOUND SERVICES 59,805 19.928 21.516 5.731 10.280 68 38,Z69 38*289 64 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 30*425 10.136 12.073 2*985 18.352 18.352 60 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1.300 432 440 49 860 TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES 31,7Z5 10#568 12.513 3#034 19,212 860 19*212 66 61 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2.805 932 154 394 1.951 1995t TO TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 80 160- 80- 80- 0 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1.450 480 Z71. 81 1,179 1,179 81 TOTAL BLOU? DONOR PROGRAM 4,255 1,41Z t.?U5 315 3,050 3.050 T2 SOCIAL AGENCIES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19.000 6,328 6,675 2.125 12.125 12,125 64 TOTAL SOCIAL AGENCIES 19.000 6,328 6.875 2*IZ5 12.125 12.125 64 HUMANSERVICESDIVISION-__ ®y®238,225 TOTAL- - - __T 79,344 85,940 23*19T 152.Z85 152.285 64 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING TOTAL PERSONAL SCRVICES 120.800 40,252 46#617 12.363 74,183 74,183 61 TOTAL CONTRALTUAL SERVICES 22,900 7,624 6,206 1.668 16,694 16,694 73 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3,800 1,260 1.132 331 2,668 2.668 TO TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,000 664 407 216 1,593 1.593 BD TOTAL AUMINISTRATtON AND PLANNING 149,500 49,800 54,362 14:578 95*138 95,138 64 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 34,900 LI.628 13.773 3*148 21,121 21.127 61 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.000 8,332 2.461 801 22,539 22,539 90 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 40,000 13,332 40,000 40,000 100 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 99.900 33*292 16.234 39949 83,666 83*666 84 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 23,400 7.796 39843 1.232 19,557 19*557 84 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL DOWNTOWN REUEYECOPMENT-TIE 23,400 7.796 39843 1,Z32 19.557 19*557 0 84 CDBG ADMINISTRATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 29,600 9,860 11,115 2.440 18,485 18.485 62 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,600 3,856 2.776 574 8.824 8.824 76 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,150 380 1.150 t.150 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,000 332 182 818 TOTAL CDBG ADMINISTRATION 43,350 t4.428 14.073 3,Ot4 29,277 818 29.277 62 68 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 52,600 17,524 3,400 39400 49,200 49.200 94 TOTAL CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 529600 17,524 3,400 3,400 49,200 49,200 94 PAGE 17 UNEXPENQEO ' VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BALANCE ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT BAL 153.389 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8131189 100 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL CDBG ACCESSIBILITY G NEIGHBORHOOD IMPRVM 66,803 87 91.639 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 153.500 51.164 112 TOTAL COBG ACCESSI9ILITY E NEIGHBO 153,500 51.164 112 19415 CUBG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION 40- 4o- O TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6.000 2.000 1.164 311 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 100.000 33.332 13,197 627 TOTAL CDLG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITAT tU6,000 35,332 14,361 938 CDBG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION 845 845 85 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 8.000 2.664 27959 430 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2.000 664 565 91 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 30.000 10,000 30.040 597.830 TOTAL CDBG COMM-_RCIAL REHABILITATI 40,000 13.328 33,584 430 CDBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITATION 9 67.026 T2 8.599 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,500 832 244 9 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 60,000 20.000 62 210.320 TOTAL CDBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITA 62,500 209832 244 9 CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 475 43.677 62 37.911 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1,000 332 155 128 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 59000 1.664 9,389 9,389 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITUR-S 62,000 20,664 51,072 50,988 TOTAL CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 69,000 22,660 60.616 60,377 TOTAL -PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT -_----798.750 14.245 266,156 200.829 87,927 STREET DIVISION 81 5,263 5,263 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 68,288 150 68.136 48 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 140,615 63.520 56.867 t1.603 TOTAL CONTRAZTUAL SERVICES 93.260 31,076 26,225 8.579 TOTAL COMMODITIES 13.300 4.428 4.701 1.382 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,000 332 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 298.175 99.356 87.793 21,564 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1691975 56.652 64.618 16,055 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 69.900 23.288 25,748 1,970 TOTAL COMMODITIES 73.500 24.484 35,589 79013 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 15.000 4,996 192 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 5,700 1,900 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDI 334,075 111.320 126.147 25,038 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 102,695 34,224 59,712 15,404 TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL SERVICES 26.500 81832 12.t05 8.983 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,950 2.308 1,305 816 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5.650 1,876 387 21 TOTAL MAINTLNANCE OF GROUNDS 141.795 47,240 73,509 25,224 PAGE 17 UNEXPENQEO UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 153.389 153,386 100 153.389 153,386 100 4,836 4.836 81 86,803 66,803 87 91.639 91,639 86 5,041 59041 63 I.415 19415 71 40- 4o- O 6.416 6.416 16 2.256 2.256 90 60.000 60,000 100 62.256 62,256 to0 845 845 85 4,389- 49389- 88- 10.928 9t 10.837 17 7,334 91 7.293 it 597.922 91 597.830 75 133,748 133.748 70 67.035 9 67.026 T2 8.599 53 8.546 64 1,000 1.000 100 21U.382 62 210.320 7t 105,358 105,357 62 44,152 475 43.677 62 37.911 55 37,856 52 14,808 128 14.680 98 5.700 5.700 100 207.929 658 207,270 62 42,983 42,983 42 14.397 150 14.245 54 5,645 5,645 81 5,263 5,263 93 68,288 150 68.136 48 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31/89 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUA A STREET DIVISION UNENCUM L CTUAL STREET MAINTENANCE 209468 4.504 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12.000 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 80.785 269920 37.255 9,651 TOTAL CUNTRACTUAL SERVICES 103.500 34,496 ZT,153 4,012 TOTAL COMMODITIES !4,500 t19488 11,105 6.810 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,655.000 551,656 275,822 L64999T TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 1,873,785 624,560 351.335 185.470 SNOW REMOVAL TOTAL COMMODITIES. 111,000 4.996 13.000 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Sb, 440 Z8.808 13,041 3,389 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICFS 7.000 2,328 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 177,250 TOTAL COMMUUITIES 739000 23,328 218,200 72.724 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 149500 4.828 3,49Z 2,795 TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL 177,940 59.292 13.041 31389 LEAF REMOVAL UNENCUM % TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 61,425 209468 4.504 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12.000 4,000 16,000 TOTAL COMMODITIES 14.300 4.760 67 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 16,000 8,664 68 TOTAL LEAF REMUVAL 113,725 37.892 209571 STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENANCE 13.804 1,508,646 81 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 42,045 14.008 14.067 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24,000 7,996 1,310 TOTAL COMMODITIES. 111,000 4.996 13.000 TOTAL STORM SEWER AND CASIN MAINTE 819045 279000 ZB,3TT FORESTRY 124 164.775 93 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 177,250 59,068 68.947 IUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 218,200 72.724 20,481 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10,500 3,49Z 2,795 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITURcS 45.000 15.000 36.041 TOTAL EURESTRT 45.).950 tt)0.284 128.264 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 27,978 67 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 44.370 149784 14,612 TOTAL COMMOUITIES 19,6U0 6.528 4,923 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.000 664 65 TOTAL TRAFiIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 65.910 21,916 19,535 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION 1,070 1969649 90 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 339675 119220 149599 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.000 3,332 10.000 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8.800 ZP932 153 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 75,000 24,992 10,835 TOTAL PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATIO 127,475 42.476 35,587 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS Z90o0 too TOCOL PERSONAL SERVICES 9,950 3,312 3.793 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 121500 4.160 1.560 TOTAL COMMODITIES 24,500 8.160 2.271 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY 46,950 159632 7,644 592 16,000 16,592 3,573 85 3,530 T9188 I5, 712 139T07 799 3,581 33.199 3,118 Z9T96 5.914 3,280 10,000 35 &0,835 24,150 1,804 1,466 1,509 49779 PAGE 18 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 43,530 43.530 54 76,341 333 761014 73 23,395 4 23,391 68 1,3T9,178 13.467 1.365,Tt1 83 &.5ZZ.450 13.804 1,508,646 81 73,399 73.399 85 71000 8 69992 LOO 70,000 70,000 100 14.500 116 14.384 99 164,899 124 164.775 93 56,921 56.921 93 4.000- 4.000- 33- 149233 18 14,215 99 26,000 262 25.738 99 93.154 280 92.674 82 279978 27,978 67 22.690 337 ZZ.353 93 2,000 16 1.984 L3 52,666 353 52,315 65 108.303 106,303 61 197.719 1,070 1969649 90 7,105 7 7.699 73 8.959 20 8,939 20 322.686 1.097 321.589 71 29,758 29.758 67 14.677 32 14.645 TS 2,000 Z90o0 too 46.435 32 46.403 TO 19,076 19,OT6 57 0 8,647 89647 98 64.165 100 64,065 85 91,888 100 91,788 72 6.157 6,157 62 109920 60 t0.860 87 22.230 ZZ,2Z9 91 39,307 60 39.246 84 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31/99 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO STREET OIY[SION BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 66.746 669146 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 100.175 33.380 33.429 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3.750 1.244 1.058 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENUITURES 122.3UO 40.764 38,157 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 4,500 230,725 1.496 76.884 72.644 POUL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 158,061 43 158,038 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6.390 2.124 2,066 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5,000 1,664 3,353 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9.800 3,264 3,108 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 239500 7.828 18.927 TOTAL POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 44.690 14.880 27.454 TRAFFIC SIGNALS E STREET LIGHTING 4,215 17,236 29 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL 261,000 87.000 67,087 COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 69000 2.000 1.090 11,500 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS E STREET LIG 218,500 3.832 92,832 68,177 TOTAL -STREET -DIVISION -�_�---� 4,265.800 1.421,624 1.060,078 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 9B 210.323 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 210,150 T5 391,224 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 222,710 74.212 64,930 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL 566.300 188,728 L69.366 COMMGOITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 22,000 7,324 8,997 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPFNSE L.000 602,690 332 200,888 1110552 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPtAT 1.414,700 471.484 354,845 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS 1,000 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 40.675 13,552 10.040 TOTAL CUMMOOITIES 11.000 3.660 L.694 TOTAL CAPITAL FXPENDITURES 129000 2,000 3.996 1.513 TOTAL MAINTENANCF OF PUBLIC BUILOI 65,675 664 21.872 13.247 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 9,306 85 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 43,010 14.328 19.151 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5.400 1,800 992 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 400 449810 132 16,260 20.143 WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE E REPAIR 52,428 80 4,983 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL 1314.405 46,L28 46.356 CONTRACTUAL SFRVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 229,000 T6. 324 19,788 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 19,500 37,000 6.500 2.588 TOTAL WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE E R 423,905 12.332 141,284 15.547 84,279 PAGE 19 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM Z BALANCE ENCU14BERFO BALANCE BAL 8.172 66.746 669146 67 300 2.692 2,692 72 89373 849143 19 84,124 69 16.845 4,500 24 4,476 99 158,061 43 158,038 66 454 4.324 4,324 68 29305 1,647 LL 1.636 33 838 6.692 6,692 68 618 4,573 18 49555 19 4,215 17,236 29 17,207 39 16,461 193,913 1939913 74 596 4,910 4,910 82 17.05T 11,500 173 I1,3Z7 9B 210.323 173 210,150 T5 391,224 3,205,726 16,965 31188,757 75 13,IT8 157.780 157,780 71 48,988 396,934 15 396.919 TO 29684 13,003 53 12,950 59 1,000 1,000 100 491,140 491.138 81 649850 1.059.857 68 1,059,787 T5 30,635 30,635 75 1,051 9.306 9,306 85 116 10,487 10,487 87 1,167 2.000 2,000 100 52.428 52,428 80 4,983 23.859 23.859 55 618 49408 4,408 82 5.601 400 29.667 400 100 28,667 59 9,641 92,049 92,049 67 5.513 209,212 209,212 91 730 16,912 16.912 87 551 219453 88 21,365 5B 16,435 339,626 88 339,538 80 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8/31189 1989-90 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL MATER AND SEWER DIVISION Z86- UNENCUM Y NATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. G REPR. ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 135,115 459036 39,942 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 16.600 5,532 3,t9t TOTAL COMMODITIES 507700 16,896 17,514 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 76,000 25.332 14.614 TOTAL NATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. E Z7A,415 92,796 75.261 NATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MINT. 4,678,946 429316 ST TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 74,470 24,816 32,154 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 700 232 I73 TOTAL COMMODITIES 32,700 tO#896 7,101 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 28.000 99332 18.IZS TOTAL WATE2 VALVE AND HYDRANT MAIN 135.870 45,276 57.553 MATER METER 1NSTAL.REPR.E REPL. 300 30,796 84 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 63,020 21,000 27,188 TOTAL CONTRA--TUAL SERVICES 35,500 12,160 5,404 TOTAL COMMODITIES 799600 26,524 4,803 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 21,000 8,332 62 TOTAL NATER METER INSTAL.REPR.E RE 201.,1ZO 68,016 31,395 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS 10 63,112 69 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 117,t10 399028 449578 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,000 I.ODO 761 TOTAL COMMODITIES 91.700 30,564 28,5t8 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITURFS 8.000 2,664 61 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE C OPER 2114,8t0 T3.256 73,917 SANITARY SEWER MAINT. E REPAIR 419541 54 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 60,805 20,260 27,193 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES •,000 29332 2,718 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9.000 2,996 5.353 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER MAINT. E REPA 769805 25,568 35.264 NATER SYSTEM IMPROVtMENTS TOTAL CAPITAL "EXPENDITURES 444,000 147,996 TOTAL WATEK SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 444.000 147,996 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 286 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 95,000 31,664 23 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 959000 319664 309 LAKE MICHIGAN MATER ACQUISITION TOTAL PERSONAL StRVICES 59500 L,832 TOTAL CONTRAZTUAL SERVICES 19640.000 546,660 514,057 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.325,000 441.664 432,398 TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISIT299713,500 990,156 946,455 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 6,37796tO 27125,648 19698,668 4.501 3.398 7,899 8,016 4,361 189125 309502 69166 3#689 9,855 99801 48 79107 16.956 6,791 346 647 7,784 PAGE 20 UNEXPENDEO Z86- UNENCUM Y BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL 95.173 94,691 95.113 70 13,409 94 13.315 80 33,186 3 33,183 65 61,386 892,602 6(,386 8l 2039154 97 203,057 13 42,316 4,678,946 429316 ST 527 SZ7 TS 25,599 58 ZSs54t TB 9,875 99875 35 78,317 58 7B,Z59 58 35,832 35,832 57 31.096 300 30,796 84 74,T98 27 74.770 94 25,000 25,000 100 166•TZ6 327 166.348 82 7Z•>33 729532 62 2.239 2,239 75 63.122 10 63,112 69 B.000 B.ODU 100 145,894 10 145,883 66 33.612 33.612 55 4,282 4,282 61 39647 39647 41 41,541 419541 54 444,000 2.682 441,318 99 444,000 ZT682 441,318 99 Z86- 286- O Z3 94,977 67332 887645 93 23 94,691 6,332 88,359 93 5.500 5.500 100 103,322 tT1259943 1x125,943 69 107.49Z 892,602 892.602 67 210.814 2#024,045 2,024#045 68 371,886 4,678,946 99662 4,669,ZdO 73 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8131189 1989-90 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO PARKISYSTEM BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL NG DIYI S I ON ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 3.720 0 3.720 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 11.735 3.908 4.369 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 62.630 20.872 8.548 TOTAL COMMODITIES 49414 Be 3.748 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 74,365 24.780 12.917 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 39.406 395 39.011 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 49095 1.364 375 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES t0,700 3.564 29365 - TOTAL COMMODITIES ".000 1.664 586 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 61,300 229424 41,363 TOTAL PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 87.095 29.016 47.689 TOTAL -PARKING -SYSTEM-DLVISION�----- i161.460 53.796 60.606 ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL PUBLIC IMPROVcMENT PLANNING TOTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 7.035 TOTAL CUNTRACTUAL SERVICES 1.742x000 580.664 378.777 TOTAL COMMODITIES 29000 664 73.468 TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 1.744.000 591.328 459.280 TOTAL REFUSEDISPOSAL -DIVISION ® - ---�-_v 1.7449000 591.328 459.280 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURLS 555.735 185.236 415.849 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 141.250 47.076 71.323 TOTAL 004NTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONST 6960985 23Z.312 487.172 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12.000 4,000 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 80.000 Z6.664 14.141 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 250,000 83,332 TUTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 342.000 113.996 14.141 GENERAL EQUIP 6 IMPRVMNTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 504,000 1669664 3,979 TOTAL GENERAL EQUIP G IMPRVMNTS 500,000 166,664 3,979 TOTAL -CAPITAL -IMPROVEMENTS 1.538.985 5129972 505,292 9T5 29717 39691 PAGE 21 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 7.366 7.366 63 549082 54.082 66 0 61.448 6t.448 83 91- 91- 91- 1.566 130*962 216 132.744 1329144 29677 Z.677 49897 49897 1,500 1.500 9.074 0 0 0 79035- 3.720 0 3.720 91 448 8.335 34 8.301 78 257 4.414 19284.720 49414 Be 3.748 ZZ,937 361 22,576 34 49503 39.406 395 39.011 45 8.195 100,854 395 100.459 62 91- 91- 91- 1.566 130*962 216 132.744 1329144 29677 Z.677 49897 49897 1,500 1.500 9.074 0 0 0 79035- 19035- 0 19363.223 1.3639223 TB 719468- 71.468- 573- 1.284.720 1.Z84.T20 T4 19284.720 1.284.TZ0 14 1399886 74 139.812 25 69.928 69.927 50 209.814 74 209.T39 30 12.000 12.000 t00 65.859 65.859 82 250.000 250,000 100 327,859 327,859 96 496,021 496,OZ1 99 496.021 496.021 99 19033.694 T4 19033*619 67 PAGE 22 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ENCUMBLREU BALANCE BAL BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT 7.660 54 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 04 ENDING 8131189 54 1989-90 Y-T-D Y-T-O CUR MO t93 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES 3.352 9 2,050 2:050 COMMUNITY GROUPS 4.905 5T 4.848 57 800 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14.100 4.696 6.440 2.500 TOTAL COMMUNITY GROUPS 14*IOO 49696 6.440 2.500 4TM OF JULY E CIVIC EYENtS. EtL. 292t9.400 2vZl9v400 l00 2,219,400 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 15,500 S,I60 12,909 138 TOTAL CONTRACIUAL SERVICES 14*5O0 4.832 14.307 29445 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6*050 2.008 5,482 1.511 TOTAL 4TH OF JULY E CIVIC EVENTS, 36,050 LZ90O0 32.698 4.094 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 376,019 64 1,374,129 19374.129 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2.050 680 90 1,526,663 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 8.500 2,832 3.595 30595 TOTAL COMMODITIES 800 264 TOTAL HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 11,350 3.776 3,594 3.595 TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ----------------------------------- 61,500 20.472 42.733 10,169 LIBRARY SERVICES LIBRARY OPERATIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2,219.400 739,792 TOTAL LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2.219.400 739.792 TOTAL LIBRARY SERVICES ------------------------------------- 292I9*40O 739,792 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TOTAL DEPT SERVICE EXPENSE 1.186,950 395.624 363,168 7.268 TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION SONGS 1.186,950 395,624 363,168 7.288 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 102.815 34,252 Z7,t67 TOTAL SPECtAL SEEVICE AREA BONOS 102.815 34,252 27.167 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS --------------------------------------- 1,289.765 429,876 390.335 7,288 PEINSIUN FUNDS EMPLOYEE PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 586,600 195.524 210.58t 47.166 TOTAL cMPLOYEE PENSIONS 596.600 1959524 210.581 479166 POLICE PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 19525.000 508.324 150,871 43.586 TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS t95Z59000 508.324 150.871 43.586 FIREMENS PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1.657,000 552.324 130,337 34.963 TOTAL FIREMENS PENSIONS 1.657,000 552,3Z4 t30.337 34,963 PAGE 22 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BALANCE ENCUMBLREU BALANCE BAL 7,660 7.660 54 7,600 7.b60 54 29591 2,591 17 143 t93 I 568 568 9 3.352 3.352 9 2,050 2:050 100 4.905 5T 4.848 57 800 800 t00 7,755 5T 7.698 69 16,767 57 18,7t0 30 2.219.400 2,219.400 100 292t9.400 2vZl9v400 l00 2,219,400 2.219.400 100 823,786 823,T82 69 823,786 823,7BZ 69 T5,648 T59648 74 75.648 75.648 74 89'1,434 899.430 70 376,019 376*OL9 64 376:019 376,019 64 1,374,129 19374.129 90 1,374.129 1,374,129 90 1,526,663 1,526,663 92 19526,663 1,5269663 92 General & Special Revenue Funds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Risk Management Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 Debt Service Funds Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION September 14, 1989 Cash & Invest. Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest. Balance 9/01/89 Through Per Attached Journal Balance 9/01/89 9/14/89 List of Bills Entry 9/14/89 $ 4,261,609 $196,712 $ 772,486 $ 3,685,835 849,098 88,825 145,243 792,680 839 7,000 7,688 151 181,920 13,661 52,455 143,126 3,804,172 268,662 306,764 3,766,070 217,507 5,839 4,669 218,677 1,198,307 13,464 36,859 1,174,912 687,927 8,609 39,370 657,166 342,764 3,209 - 345,973 1,507 - - 1,507 1,301,367 23,941 - 1,325,308 3,095 3,263 5,061 1,297 1,307,837 169,505 24,252 1,453,090 13,746,305 24,316 - 13,770,621 15,905,283 24,580 - 15,929,863 3,568 - - 3,568 $43.813,105851 586 $1,394,847 - $43,269,844 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS AERIAL/CENTURY SIGN CO. 3OND REFUND 1072 $100.00 S10O.00 W. R. BAAS BOND REFUND C4581 $L00.00 $100.00 BEL -AIR PLUMBI4G BOND REFUND 05643 525.00 525.00 BERGEN CONSTRUCTION CORP. HYDRANT BOND REFUND $995.80 $995..80 GEORGE J. BIDDLE REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $.66 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $6.84 $7.50 B. SLANDFORU REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $2.42 REFUND FINAL W4TER BILL $25.08 527.5iu BERNICE BRADLEY REFU.140 FINAL WATER BILL 5.88 REFUND FINAL NATER BILL $11.32 $12.20 BREX-ARLINGTON BOND REFUND C5566 $100.00 6100.00 CITIBANK• N.A. PYMT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS $3,325.64 $3025.64* CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PYMT-HELFENBEIN 9/7/89 $224.25 $224.25: CREATIVE STRUCTURES BOND REFUND 05915 $100.00 $100.00 DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT PAYROLL PERIOC ENDING 9/7/89 $368x039.97 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9/7/89 51 555.36 � PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9/7/89 $651.33 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9/7/89 $29:771.63 s PAYROLL PERI00 ENDING 9/12/89 537,653.99 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 9/12/89 $2v785.00 1440v457.28* FIRST NATIONAL. BANK OF MT. PRO DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 9/7/89 $9.506.49 � DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 9/7/'89 $116.8L DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 9/7/89 $48.91 DUE TO FED DEP PA" OF 9/7/89 52.235.85 DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 9/17/89 $704.92 "x DUE TO FED OEP PAY OF 9/I2/89 $209.15 DUE TO FED DEP PAY GF 9/12/89 519748.26 S14s570.39# FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS MEDICAL BENEFIT REIMS -SEPT $4:393.61 DEPENDENT CARE REIMS-SrPT $667.75 $5:061.36* FULL GOSPEL CHURCH OF H JPE OVERPYMT FINAL "MATER BILL $1.76 OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL $20.49 $22.25 EDWARD GIUNTINI REFUND '_'VERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL 516.21 REFUND )VERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL $1.'54 $17.75 JOHN P. GOGGIN REFUND REAL ESTATE TRF TAX 5175.00 $175.00* GRACO ROBOTICS• INC. OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL 512.76 OVERPYMT FINAL WATER 'BILL '61.10 $13.86 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS GUARDIAN HEATING I.B.M. CORPORATION ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT JANICE BUILDING CO. SOTIRIOS KALATZIS KARRISON C BYRNE KLEEN ALL OF AMERICA KOPKE CONSTRUCTION SAM LOUCKES MICHAEL*S CARPENTRY CARLO PANETTrINE PAUL PISSIOS JAMES POWLES PROSPECT HEIGHTS PARK DISTRICT R 3 E G SEWER RMRS SYSTEM RSEP KENSINGTON LTD. RICHARD SITKO ULTRA RENOVATING SERVICE VILLAGE OF MIUUNT PROSPECT CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MUUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 PURCN ASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL BOND REFUND 06014 $100.00 $100.00 TRAINING $480.00 $480.00 EMPLOYEE SHARE IMRF AUGUST 84 $13.982.11 EMPLOYER SHARE IMRF AUGUST 89 $Z7►218.30 5429200.41* BOND REFUND 03006 587837.41 BOND REFUND $129390.00 3210227.9" REFUND FINAL WATER BILL 343.48 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL 59.02 $102.50 ANNUAL AUDIT 4/30%89 -FINAL BILLING $20800.00 ANNUAL AUDIT 4/30/89 -FINAL BILLING 529800.00 $5►600.00 BOND REFUND C4848 $500.00 $500.00 BOND R&-UND C58TZ $100.00 3%00,00 BOND REFUND 04298 $100.00 $100.00 BOND REFUND C5326 5100.00 51Oia.00 BO NO REFUND 02464 550.00 $50.00 80-40 REFUND C6151 S10O.00 $100.00 REFU'40 FINAL NATER BILL 57.34 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL '5,66 $8.00 DEVELOPMENT DONATIONS $187000.00 $180000.00* BOND REFU40 C6108 5100.00 $100.00 POSTAGE METER ADV DEP $30OOO.00 $39OOO.00* BOND REFUND 1023 $ 100.00 5100.110 REFUND "IF REAL ESTATE TRF TAX $90.00 $90.0 SUPPLIES ;158.00 SUPPLIES 575.00 $233.00 REINSPECT FEE CZ964 S5O.00 REINSPECT FEE 05149 5100.00 WATER USED -BERGEN CONSTR S4.2U $154.20 ***TOTAL** S5`56,v681.6} GENERAL FUND S413►201.89 COMMUP41TY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,072.17 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 552v455.I6 WATER E SZWER FJNO $313#013.19 PARKING SYSTEM RcVENUE FUND $7JO.Z4 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $39325.64 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRV. t RtPt. FUND s18r000.00 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $5x061.36 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 32492+2.16 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION RAY 06HERRON CO.9 INC. BADGES $79.00 ET9.q, PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $92.40 592.41, PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL** $171.40 GENERAL FUND $171.40 VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE CALLAGHAN 6 COMPANY LEGAL FJRMS 398.81 $98.81 COMM. ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW REGISTRATION $100.00 $100.00: APRIL FOLZY STATE REGISTRATION 550.00 '$50.00 MOUNT PROSPECT" CHAMBER OF COMM REGISTRATION 5150.00 31500(' NORTHWEST 2001 REGISTRATION $25.00 S25..U{ PETTY CASK — FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $23.79 $23.79# PETTY CASH — FIRE DEPT. SUPPLIES9 MEETINGS TRAVEL 321.00 $21.00 PEDERSEN E HOUPT LEGAL FEES—JULY $39590.93 $39590.93 XEROX CORP. MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN 5139.61 5139.b1 VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE *TOTAL*vt $49199.14 GENERAL FUND $49199.14 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ILLINOIS SELL TELEPHONE CO. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $3v751.98 PAGE 4 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $90.00 59O.0 NEWPORT COLOR 13C. PAYMENT DATE 4/i4/89 $272.25 5272.25 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TC1TAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS MISC EXPENSES $30.09 ACCURATE TEMPORARIES SECRETARIAL SERVICE $219.00 8219.00 ACCURATE TEMPORARIES .'4W TEMP SECS? $251.85 $251.85 BULSMAN,, INC. SUPPLIES $238.40 $238.40 CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP AD $88.00 $88.00 THE HERALD AD $97.50 $97.50 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 87.47 $49.00 ROSCOR CORPORATION MISC EXPENSES LAMP $Z6.O0 $33.4 - XEROX CORP. MONTHLY CHARGES FOR 1090 COPIER $77*00- LOWELL SOFT -KIT $601.87 $2vO99.36 XL/DATACOMP INC. LO#ELL SOFT -KIT SI29.O0 5552.87 CABLF TV OPERATIONS ***TOTAL** $1081.O9 GENERAL FUND $11531.09 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ILLINOIS SELL TELEPHONE CO. PHO'- S.RVICE $3v751.98 53zT51.9r1 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM SERVICE $90.00 59O.0 NEWPORT COLOR 13C. SUPPLIE' $272.25 5272.25 NURIHWESI STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $14.97 $14.9T PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $30.09 MISC EXPENSES $5.90 # MISC EXPENSES 713.45 539.44# PEDERSEN E HOUPT TRF TAX TRANSACTIONS $310.00 $310.00 PRO -LAME INC. SUPPLIES $98.40 '$98.40 SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE 43ELIVERY $27.90 DELIVERY 521.10 $49.00 WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES,, INC COMPUTE -t SUPPLIES 8837.96 $837.46 XEROX CORP. MONTHLY CHARGES FOR 1090 COPIER 51,,959.75 MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN $139.61 $2vO99.36 XL/DATACOMP INC. MAINT S' =RV - SEPTEMBER, $12.00 $12.O0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PA -MENT DATE 9/14/69 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** 17v575.36 GENERAL FUND $7s575.36 **«*xx*x*aa�***x***$xx;xxa�a«x«xxx�e«xx«xxxu«xxa�xxxxxx$x«xxscxx«xxxxxxxxxxxx�ax:�axxxx«fax#xxxxxxa�axz�xxxxa�'� VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE INTERNATIONAL AUDIOS INC. TAPES MUNICIPAL CLERKS OF ILLINOIS MEMBERSHIP PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICE LEGAL NOTICE LEGAL NJTICE SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE DEtIVERIES VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE GENERAL FUND 5234.56 $58.77 $58.77 $40.00 $40.00 529.57 $41903.00 $59.15 $134.60+ $56.87 $1.5.59 340. 20 $40.20 ***TOTAL** 5284.56 #xxx+�«xx«xaex#xa�xxsxs«vuxxxxc«xxxrxxaxxxxxxr#xrx#x�xxnxxxxxxxxxxxxx;:««�cxxx«xraras�xxaxxxxrx«xYxxwax+zx«�x�. RISK MANAGEMENT DUPAGE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE C ARTHUR J GALLAGHER G CO GOOD SAMARITAN HOSPITAL JACKSDN9 LONG £ ASSOCIATES NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SERVICES RENDERED LIF:-- I&IURANCE SEPTEMBER 1989 WORK CLPIP AUDIT SERVICES RENDERED ,JACKSON LONG 8/30-9/5 JACKSON LONG SEPT 7-12 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT SERVICES RENDERED $61.00 $61.00* $19976.64 $19976.64* 5419903.03 $41903.00 $134.60 $134.60+ 5169010.79 $109127.55 $269138.34* 573.50 $69.50 x $171.00 $314.00* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 4114189 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT DOROTHY ROGOWSKEY_ -,(Ei%18jRsEm NT $5.50 $5.50# RISK MANAGEMENT ***TOTAL## S33033.08 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $335533.08 INSPECTION SERVICES ANDERSON PEST CONTROL BOCA INTERNATIONAL INC. ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE GREGORY G. GRAHAM NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S TREASURER• STATE OF ILLINOIS TRITON CONSULTING ENCINEERSS L , XL/OATACOMP INC. INSPECTION SERVICES GCNERAL FUND PEST CONTROL $65.00 PEST CONTROL 565.00 PEST CONTROL $50.00 5180.00 MEMNERSHIP RENE=WAL 3280.00 %180.00 SUPPLIES 545.00 $45.00 MAItl'NG LABELS 558.00 558.00 CLOTHING:: ALLOW $48.13 CLOTHING: ALLOW $45.96 $44.09 OFFILE .SUPPLIES 527.29 %27.24 MISC EXPENSES 5$.80 � MISC EXPENSES $2„45 MISC EXPENSES 530.00 MISC EXPENSES $9.15 $50.40# ELEV IN PECTIONS $150.00 ELEV INSPECTIONS SLt30.00 5250.00 REIMS Ff-)R OVERPYMT 1111.89 SLli.d4 CENTRAL RD IMPRVMT 3I2t749.54 $125799.54 :MAINZ SERV - SEPTEMBER 112.00 SI2.00 ###TOTAL*# $135d08.76 $1 31P 80 8. 76 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT YAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT TED ADAMCZYK EXPENSES $42.00 $42.00 CADE INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES $233.75 $233.75 COMM- ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAUi REGISTRATION $100.00 51DD.00* CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED SUPPLIES $139.20 $139.20 GALL S. INC. SUPPLIES $95.47 $95.47 GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION PAPER $61.70 $61.70 HANSEN ASSOCIATES SERV MAINT AGRMT $401.43 $401.y_ ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. PHONE SERVICE $35.72 PHONL-- SERVICE $30.63 PHONE SERVICE $19.57 PHONE SERVICE $150.00 KALE UNIFORMS PHONE SERVICE $40.00 $276.02 300Y ARMOR $295.00 BODY ARMOR $295.00 13ODY ARMOR $295.00 KENNETH LEE 3ODY ARMOR $295.00 Li,i80.00 LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC. EXPENSES SUPPLIES $24.00 524.00 $42.35 SUPPLIES $404.00 SUPPLIES $111.18 CREDIT ACCT '$10.40 - LITTLE AMERICA SUPPLIES PRISJNER FOND - AUGUST $519.90 $lvO6T.03 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS S OFFIC SUPPLIEr $110.85 $110Bfr LUND INDUSTRIES• INC. P-4 CONVERSIUN $64.24 $83+4.55 $b4.. L�. ALFONSO MAGLIO P-4 CONVERSION $184.22 41:0$8.77 .TOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC. EXPt-NSE$ CAR RE.'ATAL 188.15 SlF.15 MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO MISC AUTO PARTS -AUG $i00.0U $328.80 $100.00 RAY O'HERRON CO., INC. SUPPLIES $96.50 $328.80 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. SUPPLIES MISC EXPENSES $72.00 $158.50 $48.10 MISC EXPENSES $13.70 MISC EXPENSES $67.02 MISC EXPENSES $16.00 � MISC EXPENSES $49.24 $194.06* VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT PHYSICIANS• DESK REFERENCE ERIC E. PIEE QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. ROBERT RIORDAN TCI OF ILLINOIS XLIDATACOMP INC. POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND Flat E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 4114184 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION PUBLICATION RADIU REPAIRS RADIO REPAIRS RAOIO REPAIRS RADIOS RADIUS PRINTING EXPENSE EX PE,N SES CABLE SERVICE - €'OLICE MAINT SERV - SEPTEMBER INVOICE AMOUNT 137.45 $96.00 $359.00 5237.00 62*000.00 $250.00 SZOO.6D $30.00 $9.00 $6 0.00 ***TOTAL** $6.973.52 CAPITAL IMPRV. C REPL. FUND PAGE 6 TOTAL $37.45 52v442.0 52OC.6, $30.00 $9.00 $60.00 $8.473.52 $2:CUO.00 ABLE FIRE SAFETY EQUIP SUPPLIES Slv065.22 $1V065.L A.E.C. FIRE EQUIPMENT INC. SPEC �.E=CUE LQUIP 38,93o.00 $8:430.00 AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION 5024651 $77.80 577.80* AQUA SAFETY EQUIPMENT, INC. RESCUE EQUIP 119690.98 S1r690.g8 ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICESsr INC ARATEX SERVICES $89.90 ARATEX 'iERVICES 372.68 ARATEX SERVICES $66.75 5229.33 ASTRAL ELECTRONICS• INC. SERVICE $111.45 1111.95 BUSSE HARDWARE ROPE $125.00 SIZ5.00 EDWARD CAVELLO EXPENSE) $300.00 5300.00 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL 3AKERY DONUTS $81.0(1 $81.00* CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS J70 „057060 0 $143.50 5143.50 CHICAGO COMM+UNICATION SERVICE' INSTALL EQ'JIPPENT $74.50 INST,.LL EQUIPMENT $341.08 VENDOR FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPUTER SUPPORT CENTRES CREATIVE VENTURES CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED HENRY DAWSON DES PLAINES AUTO SALVAGE FULTON CONTRACTING CO. GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY HANSEN ASSOCIATES ELM ER HECHT iGE, INCOeRPORATED ILLINOIS SELL TELEPHONE CO. ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSOC ILLINOIS STORAGE SYSTEMS, INC. INT*L. SOC. OF FIRE SERVICE IN RAYMOND KORDECKI LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL STUART MCKILLOP - F.O. MEDICAL PRODUCTS MIDWEST VISUAL EQUIPMENT NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS FIRE CHI NU -LIFE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9114/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL INSTALL EQUIPMENT $120.00 $585.59 3A77 -JT -Z404 -A $8.57 s8.57 REGISTRATION $160.00 $160.00 FIELD GUIDE $69.09 $69.00 SUPPLIES $139.20 $139.20 EXPENSES $10.00 EXPE�,aSES $30.00 $40.6 TOW 5 CARS $175.00 TOW EXTRA CAR 535.00 3210.00 MAINTENANCE s1V 162.68 $ITld2.68 INSTALL TIRES $270.72 $270.72 SUPPLIES x105.+6 SUPPLIES $31.56 SUPPLIES $72.15 'x209.31 SERV MAINT AGRMT $133.50 $133.50 HOSE & LABOR $341.00 $341.00 SUPPLIES $18.50 $18850 PHONE S_rRVICE $197.97 PHONE SERVICE 375.08 PHUN,E SERVICE 535.72 PHONE SERVICE $50.00 PHONE SFRV10E 398.43 5457.25 TEXTBOOK SETS 8144.00 $144.0}j" LOCKERS $3v5i9.50 $3,519.51, REGISTRATION $127.00 MEMBERSHIP 560.00 $187.00# EXPE1dSES $30.00 630.00 TUITION $220.00 $220.00 EXPENSES $54.33 $56.33 'JX YGcN (- ASE $101.65 $101.65 tRAOIG EQUIP $19036.39 $lv036.39 REGI.�TRA TIJNS 5320.00 MEMCiER SHIP $140.00 SU8SLRIPTIiON $50.80 s51G.80 REGISTRATION $100.03 s10u.00 SUPPLIES $1136.25 $186.25 VENDOR FIRE G EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. RAY O`HERRON CO., INC. ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. PEARLS VISION CENTER 0344 SAFETY KLZEN CORPORATI9N SERVICE AMERICA CORP. SHIFT CALENDARS SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION SOFTWARE EXCITEMENT STATE OF ILLINOIS SUBURBAN GAS SALES DENNIS TRILL - FD. DEL ULREICH XLIDATACOMP INC. FIRE G EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENERAL FUND CENTRAL DESPATCH SERVICE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WAGE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9%14189 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SUPPLIr_S $235.95 $235.95 PARTS €228.25 $228.Z5 SUPPLIESe MEETINGe E TRAVEL $19.99 SUPPLIES* MEETING* G TRAVEL $102.39 SUPPLIESe MEETINGe G TRAVEL E5.89 SUPPLIESe MEETINGe G TRAVEL $46.52 SUPPLIESe MEETINGe G TRAVEL 312.58 SUPPLIES* 'MEETINGe G TRAVEL 524.98 SUPPLIES-# MEETINGe G TRAVEL $2.99 SUPPLIES• MEETINGe G TRAVEL $3.11 SUPPLIES-# MEETINGe G TRAVEL $5.55 SUPPLIES-# MEETING* G TRAVEL $4.66 SZ28.7-`r SArt=IY LENS 325.00 525.00 EQUIP MAINT $58.25 S58.Z5 EXPENSLl_ S 578.00 578.00 OFFILE SUPPLIES 5212.24 $212.24 TOOLS $175.00 TOOLS 5196.00 $371.00 COMPJTE_s SUPPLIES $88.00 $83.00 BACKGROUND INV'ESTI�;ATION $168.00 $163.00# OXYGEN 549.00 $49.70 tXPENSE� 330.00 $30.00 EXP€NStS $45.00 $45.0 MAINT ScRV - SEPTEMBER $63.0,J $63.,)0 "*TOTAL** $24t55Z.44 bae426.bZ CAPITAL IMPRV. 6 REPL. FUND 516eIZ5.?2 NORTHWEST CENTRAL 3ISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED -SEPTEMBER S31e385.0L S31e385.00* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE ii ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14189 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TJTAL CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $31x387.00 GENERAL FUND $31x385.00 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION AMERICAN TAXI CO.xINC. LEONARD W, BALAN SHARON BLAZEK CAMILLE CHMELA MICHAEL DOROSH ELK GROVE TAXI S. C. AND JEAN GOOJLING ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE Cil. RAY LUNDIN FAR'LE MATTSON MOUNT PROSPECT ROTARY CLUES RICHARD NORAK NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. ELOISE PURCELL MELODI RODEN THE SALVATION ARMY OTTO SCHERR JEANNE SHERMAN BERTHA STEIL HELEN WHITLOCK HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION SENIOR CAIS RIDES 3499.50 $499.50 HDM DRIVER REIMB-AUG $24.00 $24.00 HDM DRIVER REIMS -AUG 330.00 330.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-AUG $,6.00 $6.G0 HOM DRIVER REIMB-AUG $6.00 S6.00 SENIt.)R TAXI 2IOES $56.05 $58.05 HDM DRIVER REIMG-AUG 16.00 $6.00 PHONc- SERVICE $200.00 $200.00 HDM DRIVER 4EIM6-AUG $45.00 $45.00 HDM DRIVER REIMS -AUG $9.00 $9.00 AO $3,7.00 $30.00 HOM UP.IVER REIMG-AUG $9.00 $9.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $43.96 OFFICE SUPPLIES $33.15 OFFICE SUPPLIES $23.19 $100.30 MISC EXPENSES S68.25 $6+3.25$ HDM DRIVER REIMS-AsJG 512.00 $12.00 HDM DRIVER REIMr'-AUG 16.00 $6.00 3UDGET ALLOC-2ND PYMT SLx750.00 $1050.00 HDM DRIVER REIMS -AUG $12.00 $12.00 HDM JRLVtR REIMS; -AUG $9.00 159.00 HDM DRIVER REIM`3-AUG 512.00 612.00 HDM ORIVER REIMS -AUG 16.00 $6.00 ***TOTAL** E2x898.10 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/09 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMUUNT TJTAL GENERAL FUND $29898.10 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT C.D.ti.G. LOAN CLEMSON UNIVERSITY DATED BOOKS FORGE WINDOW S DOOR MICHAEL KAUTZ CARPETS 6 DESIGN KLEES ELECTRIC MIDWEST CUNSULTING ENGINEERS MICHAEL J. MORAN PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. 9UALEXx INC. REI TITLE SERVICES SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C VANS ARTISTS DESIGNERS SUPPLIE XEPDX CORP. PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND STREET DIVISION CD3G x282.77 C08G $232.77 5565.5 FINAL PYMT INTERN SALARY x1038.69 $19733.69 OFFICE SUPPLIES 550.45 $50.45 CD,8G 3990.00 $990.00 FACADE �(E3ATE 359000.00 S5v00U.00 COBG $1x 851.00 $19951.00 ENG CONSULT SERVICE $19315.06 519315.06 SERVICES RENDERED 111.00 311.09 MISC EXPENSES 520.00 5210.00# PHOTO SUPPLIES $6.36 PHOTO SOPPLIES $3.87 510023 TITLE TRACK SEARCH $150.00 $150.00 MEJICAL SERVICES $1x133.33 $1.133.33 SUPPLIE$ $10.59 $10.59 MONTHLY FJUITY PLAN $139.60 $139.60 ***TOTAL** 5129985.4 $be9';9.56 CU MMUNITY OEV PMT BLOCK GRANT $61015.93 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SLOG SUPPLIES -AUG $118.84 SLOG SUPPLIES -AUG $31.1+ BLDG SUPPLIES -AUG 535.10 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14189 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION BLDG SUPPLIES -BCUG $36.08 BLDG SUPPLIES -AUG $24.00 3LDG SUPPLIES -AUG BLDG SUPPLIES -AUG $29.52 3L OG SUPPLIES -AUG $14.95 $438.90 AtORIDGE F LECTRIC* INC. TRAFF SIGNAL MAINT $19968.75 RESET TRAFF SIGNAL KNOCKDOWN $31880.96 AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES* IN TRAFF SIGNAL MAINT PARTS $952.68 16*302.3-4 AMERICAN FORESTRY ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION $187.17 $195.00 $I37.17 $$.95.00* ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION RESUkFACING $20x814.84 $ZU*814.84 ARTLEY PAVING L CUNTRACTING CATCH c3A5IN/INLET REPAIRS 549000.00 CATCH BASIN/INLET REPAIRS $1x073.21 CATCH! BASIN/INLET REPAIRS $20,#052.50 S25r125.61 6 E H INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES $13.10 $13.10 LETTER BILI PRODUCTS NURStRY TRUCE: ;199.00 $199.00 BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO. REPAIRS $147.75 $107.75 BUSSE HARDWARE SUPPLIES $13.37 SUPPLIES $2.39 CADE INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES GLEANING SUPPLI=S $37.31 $53.07 $331.20 RUNN-RS 5497.23 RUNNERS $199.40 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY RUNNERS SUPPLIES $451.75 $Ir479.-. CHICAGO TORO TURF E IRRIGATION SUPPLIES $582.24 $134.70 $58Z.Z4 $134.70 CLS UNIFORM RENTALS UNIFORM RENTAL $90.88 UNIFORM RENTAL $77.81 UNIFORM RENTAL $20.93 UNIFORM RENTAL $77.80 COMFORT SUPPLIES, INC. UNIFORM RENTAL SUPPLIt'� $18.33 $235.75 COMMONWEALTH EDISON STREET LIGHTING $87.45 $990?2,49 337.45 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS STREF_T E TRAFF SIGN LIGHTING CLEANING SERVICE $59176.53 514*199.02 $19836.00 CLEANING SERVICE $128.00 $1*964.0O VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNIS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9114189 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TS:JTAL STREET OIVISIJN CONRAD AND SON SUPPLIES $423.50 1423.50 CAN DEE SEWER CONSTRUCTION* IN CATCH BASINS $3,687.50 STO R M S-'WER $ 2, 315.00 $6x002.90 DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. REPAIRS $738.04 $738.00 FOREST TREE SERVICE, INC. TREE TRIMMING 13:534.38 $3,534.38 GERRARD E COMPANY SUPPLIES $412.50 SUPPLIES $44.73 1457.L_ THE GLIDDEN COMPANY ST?PPLIES $56.78 SUPPEIES $19.06 $75.84 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES TIRES 5104.16 5104.16 HOWELL TRACTOR E EQUIPMENT CO. MARTS $b95.34 5695.34 ILLINI31S FWD TRUCK L EQJIPMENT PARTS $21.34 SZI.34 ILLINOIS IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC SUPPLIES $25.20 $25.20 FRANK JARECKI SIDEWALK REPL S82.01� $82.00 MARTAM CO:'4STRUCTION, INC. PROSPECT AVE RECONSTR $66,178.80 566,178.80 MEYER MATERIAL CO. CEMENT $144.00 $144.00 MOTOROLA REPAIR $112.50 $112.50 MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO MISC AUTO PARTS-AUG $+G37.24 MISC AUTO PARTS-AUG $76.32 MISC AUTO PARTS-AUG $339.71 6853.27 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 11 S PINE 5T 554.30 1700 N CENTRAL $562.40 1830 KE'4SINGTON 149.67 $66b.- NOVAK E PARKER INC. AIR LONOITIONER $320.00 $3ZO.Oc} NUR11WEST FURL) TRUCK SALES INC PARTS $126.80 $126.86 PETTY 'CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL L SUPPLIE=S $40.36 TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $39.69 TRAVi-L E SUPPLIES $9..61 # TRAVEL E SUPPLIES 517..99 $107.65* SOUND INCORPORATED SERVICZ $75.00 $75.00 STATE TREASURER CENTRAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION 124.199.57 $24,199.57 STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC. PLSG SUPPLIES $740.82 SUPPLIES 121.53 $762.35 TC1 OF ILLINOIS CABLE SERV - PUBLIC WKS 612.75 112.75 TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION, INC. CURB E t;UTTcR PROGRAM $783016.5) LURB E "UTTER PROGRAM $10,233.00 1889249.50 VENDOR STREET DIVISION VENTURE HOBBIES VESCO WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO. ZIEBECL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS ZIP -PENN, INC. 3M PWG1100 RL STREET DIVISION GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUNU MATER AND SEWER UIVISION ACTION CONCRETE E SUPPLY ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. GLEN ANDLER APEX POWER EQUIPMENT COMPANY ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA BRISTOL HOSE L FITTING JANE E. CARLINE CLS UNIFORM RENTALS CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT•L 3K DONOHUE E ASSOCIATE -Ss INC. DOOR SYSTEMS,# IMC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SEWER PIPE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $123.770.13 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $ 104.16 PAGE 15 INVOICE AMOUNT T,JTAC $67.87 $67.87 $640+00 $640.00 S109.95 592.00 $228.83 E338.T8 *lvO6Z.47 51,#062.47 $104.90 $104.1 5285.40 $285.r ***TOTAL** 5Z69,#137.12 311+5,P242.P3 SUPPLIES $705.00 $705.00 BLDG SUPPLIES -AUG $92.00 592.00 ADVANCE EXPENSES S1,#155.00 51rI55.00 SUPPLIES 599.75 $39.711` FILM 51113.71 $1113.71 FI TTINZ;S $167.52 $157.52 REIMbURSEMcNT $157.5u $157.50* UNIFORM RENTAL 190.88 UNIFURM RENTAL 577.80 UNIFjRM RENTAL SZO.93 UNIFORM RENTAL $77.131 UNIFORM RENTAL $18.32 5285.74 OPER E MAINT COSTS-JAWA $24*885.00 VLG SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA $107,#492.00 LAKE HATER PURCHASE-JAWA $121,#722.00 $254#099.00 SANITARY SEWER REHAB $Ir063.26 $19063.Z6 REPAIR.`s 5738.00 $73$.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9114189 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL MATER AND SEWER DIVISION ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. SUPT;LIES $83.50 $83.50 ENGINE WORKS INC. MANUAL $9.50 $9.50 HARPER COLLEGE TUITIONS-BUBLITZ S WAGNER $156.00 $156.00* H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE MATER METER EXCH $34.38 TESTING G REPAIR CONTRACT 522.24 WATER METES? EXCH $275.04 E331.e- I.B.M. CORPORATION COMP EQUIP $321.00 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $48.00 COMPUTER EQUIPMENT $890.80 SIT259.80 ILL. ENVIRONMENTAL PROT.AGENCY APPLICATION FEE SIO.00 APPLICATION FEE 520.00 $20.00* ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. PHON;: SERVICE $203.83 PHONE SsRVICE $503.43 PHONE SERVICE $30.63 PHONE SERVICE $28.93 PHONE SL kVICE $30.63 PHONE S=RVICE $57.84 PHONE SERVICE $91.89 PHONE SERVICE $15.63 PHONE S=RVICE $300.00 PHONE St RVICE $58.90 51,t3Z1.71 ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK C EQUIPMENT PARTS $21.33 $21.33 R. E. JACOBY COMPANY SUPPLIES $73.09 873.( MID AMERICA POWER DRIVES CONTROL VALVES $1,384.80 $1,384.30 MOIJ14T PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO MISC AUTO PARTS -AUG $421.89 5421.39 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA $13.44 1818 1/2 BONITA DR $14.49 117 .1 WAVERLY $9.16 NS KENSINGTON IE RNAD RD $11.03 $48.12 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS TREE NOTICE 520.00 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS EQUIPMENT BID TRAVEL E SUPPLIES SZO.OD $40.00 S3.Z5 TRAVEL G SUPPLIES E75.UO TRAVEL L SUPPLIES SZ9.04 # TRAVEL S SUPPLIES $10.50 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $1.00 � VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION RAIN40W 1 HR PHOTO EXP. ROSEMONT BUILDING 6 SUPPLY CO. SIOENER SUPPLY COMPANY TECH SYN CORPORATION TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY V E G PRINTERS INC. HERBERT WEEKS IIEBELL MATER SERVICE PRODUCTS WATER AND SEWER DIVISIOs'V WATER G SEWER FUND PARKING SYSTEM DIVISIJN VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION TRAVEL E SUPPLIES TRAVEL E SUPPLIES FILM PROCESSING FILM PROCESSING FILM PRUCESSING FILM PROCESSING 3LOG SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES HOSE SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLI `S PRINTING EXP PRINTING EXP EXPENSFS PARTS 1268050.63 PAGE 17 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $116.11 $2r428.9Z $37.66 $272.56# 321.2II 3140.00 $Z1.28 CONTn;.'L VALVES $21.54 31,384.80 $6.90 171.00 $411.25 5411.. $1,481.25 36.25 83.968.51 $875.00 $2062.50 $672.97 $672.97 $2.95 $11.51 311.51 $25.97 '1330.00 $370.00 1700.00 $155.00 3155.00 3216.50 $226.50 ***TOTAL** $268,750.63 CHICAGO S NORTHWESTERN TRANS C LAND LEASE—AUG f2,4Z8.91 $2r428.9Z COMMODORE MAINTENANtE SYSTEMS CLEANING SERVICE $140.00 3140.00 MID AMERICA POWER ORIVES CONTn;.'L VALVES $1,384.80 31,384.80 PETTY CASH — PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $14.79 $14.79: PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ###TOTAL## 83.968.51 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $3968.51 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE DISPOSAL SI1v791.08 REFUSE )ISPnSAL $135079.37 51481170.x REFUSE UISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** 5148*170.45 GENERAL FUND S14dvIT0.45 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS JOHN CECALA HIST rRICAL MUSEUM RESTORATION $39140.00 S3v140.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMCNTS ***TOTAL** $3xI40.00 CAPITAL IMPRV. 6 REPL. FUND 53VI40.00 PENSION FUNDS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PRO WITHrIOLDING TAXES 5200.00 $200.03 CHARLES W. NICK PEiYSION-SEPTEMBER $853.1.2 $833.22 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT UCT `�EUICAL INS $346.33 5346.33 PAUL H. WATKINS SEPT DISABILITY 5ENEFIT 119620.50 `IT620-50 PENSION FUNDS ***TOTAL** 53105U.05 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 9/14/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND 83s050.05 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL E1s3949846.50 DATE RUN 9/14/d9 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 TIME RUN 13.42.47 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID—APPBAR SUMMARY BY FUND 9/14/89 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT I GENERAL FUND $7729435*67 ZZ MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND S1459242.83 23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $74688.10 24 ILL* MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $52,9455#16 41 WATER & SEWER FUND $306,P763.62 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $4*668.75 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND S36058.72 51 CAPITAL IMPRV, E REPL. FUND $394369o98 73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $54061.36 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $249252.16 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $143941,846.50 P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N WHEREAS, children are this nation's most valuable resource, and a resource which must be nurtured and developed to its utmost capacity; and WHEREAS, the future of our nation depends on the well-being of our children; and WHEREAS, the incidence of poverty as well as the problems of substance 'abuse, lack of affordable child care, teenage pregnancy and failure to achieve in school are increasing in the majority of America's cities; and WHEREAS, it is acknowledged that while educational institutions are charged with the major responsibility of educating and training young people for the future, they cannot be expected to do that job alone; and WHEREAS, the United States Conference of Mayors has declared Wednesday, September 20, 989 NATIONAL EDUCATION WEEK in order to show a commitment to our children; and WHEREAS, the Conference has called upon all mayors to join together on that day in a national mobilization that will raise awareness about the problems facing educationally disadvantaged children in our communities, what is being done to address these problems, and what needs to be done. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, proclaim Wednesday, September 20, 1989 as THE UNITED STATES CONFERENCE OF MAYORS' NATIONAL EDUCATION DAY in the Village of Mount Prospect and call upon all citizens of our Village to recognize the needs of our children and resolve to do more to address these needs. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk PROCLAMATION WHEREAS, mental illness is a problem of grave concern and consequence in American society and is widely, but unnecessarily, feared and misunderstood; and WHEREAS, more than 10,000,000 people in the United States are disabled for long periods of time by schizophrenia, manic depressive disorders, and major depression; and WHEREAS, between 30 and 50 percent of homeless people suffer serious and chronic forms of mental illness; and WHEREAS, mental disorders result in staggering economic costs to society, which are estimated to be in excess of $40 billion annually and include direct treatment and support costs, as well as indirect costs, such as lost productivity; and WHEREAS, appropriate treatment of mental illness is cost effective because it restores productivity, reduces utilization of other health services, and lessens social dependence; and WHEREAS, individuals with mental illnesses and their families have begun to join self- help groups to combat the unfair stigma of the diseases, support greater investment in research, and advocate an adequate continuum of care from hospital to community; and WHEREAS, unprecedented major research developments in recent years have added new methods and technology to the sophisticated and objective study of the functioning of the brain and its linkages to normal and abnormal behavior; and WHEREAS, research in recent decades has led to a wide array of new and more effective somatic and psychosocial methods of treatment for some of the most incapacitating forms of mental illness, including schizophrenia, major affective disorders, phobias, and phobic disorders; and WHEREAS, recent and unparalleled growth in scientific knowledge about mental illness has generated the current emergence of a new threshold of opportunity for future research advances and fruitful application to specific clinical problems; and WHEREAS, serious mental illnesses such as schizophrenia and the major depressions are now known to be diseases of the brain and not caused by individual weaknesses or poor family life; and WHEREAS, persons with mental illnesses and their families are stigmatized by the myths and prejudices surrounding mental illness and are thereby doubly victimized by the illness. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT PROCLAIMED THAT 1, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do designate the week of October 1-7, 1989 as "Mental Illness Awareness Week," am pleased to recognize National Mental Illness Awareness Week as a way to reduce stigma and promote understanding of the mentally ill and their families. BE IT FURTHER PROCLAIMED THAT 1, Gerald L Farley, commend the 70,000 member -families of the National Alliance for the Mentally III (NAMI) who have joined together to support each other and their loved ones and to educate the American people on the plight of the mentally ill and that the Village of Mount Prospect joins NANff in urging the Federal Government to increase appropriations of the National Institute for Mental Health for research on serious mental illnesses. Gerald L. Farley Mayor Village of Mount Prospect Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Dated: September 19, 1989 P R 0 C L A H A T 1 0 X WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce works with the business community to advance the civic, economic, industrial, professional and cultural welfare of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, chambers of commerce have contributed to the civic and economic life in Illinois for more than 150 years since the founding of the Galena Chamber of Commerce in 1838; and WHEREAS, the State of Illinois is home to international chambers of commerce, the central region office of the U. S. Chamber of Commerce, the Illinois State Chamber of Commerce and more than 300 local chambers of commerce; and WHEREAS, the chamber of commerce and its members provide citizens with a strong business environment that increases employment, the retail trade and commerce, the industrial growth in order to make the Village of Mount Prospect a better place to live; and WHEREAS, the chamber of commerce encourages the growth of existing industries, merchants and services, and encourages new firms and individuals to locate in the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the state and local chambers of commerce act as liaisons between governmental entities and the business community in order to foster better relations. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect proclaim September 24 through September 30, 1989 as CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK and call its significance to the citizens of the Village of Mount Prospect. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk P R 0 C L A X A T 1 0 N WHEREAS, some 17 years ago the Village of Mount Prospect became a member of the first multi -community group to provide Emergency Medical Service in the entire nation; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect was the first community in the State of Illinois to initiate a Paramedic program; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has been the recipient of many awards and is widely acknowledged as a leader in the field of the Emergency Medical Services. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect do proclaim the week of September 16 - 22, 1989 as EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES WEEK in the Village and on behalf of the Board of Trustees and the residents of our community do hereby acknowledge and commend the continued dedication of those providing Emergency Medical Services. Gerald L. Farley Mayor KV*1k**AF Carol A. Fields Village Clerk RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE COMMUNITY AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION OF COOK COUNTY WHEREAS, this nation has declared War on Poverty through enactment of the Economic Opportunity Act, signed into law on August 20, 1964; and WHEREAS, the cornerstone of the Economic Opportunity Act was the Community Action Agency, created by the Act to foster the development of coordinated, comprehensive programs to address the causes and conditions of poverty by encouraging local communities to organize themselves to provide opportunities for their low-income citizens to help themselves become independent members of their community; and WHEREAS, in 1965 a voluntary association of citizens came together to discuss opportunities for local community action to combat the causes and conditions of poverty; and WHEREAS, this citizen association incorporated, in June, 1966, as the Cook County Office of Economic opportunity, Inc. and was designated under the Act s the Official Community Action Agency for suburban Cook County; and WHEREAS, this designated Community Action Agency, re -named in 1975 the Community and F�onomic Development Association of Cook County, Inc. has provided economic development and human service programs for the poor of this community it inception; and WHEREAS, through its involvement of private volunteers, development of innovative programs, and positive approaches to economic self-sufficiency, the Community and Economic Development Association of Cook County, Inc. continues to combat the basic causes and conditions of poverty; and WHEREAS, the impact of the Community and Economic Development Association of Cook County, Inc. programs and services in all community proved that poverty need not be a permanent condition of life for many of our citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the village of Mount Prospect affirms its support for the efforts of the Community and Economic Development Association of Cook County, Inc. SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect commends the Community and Economic Development Association of Cook County for its dedication to the goal of the elimination of poverty. SECTION THREE:. That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of f 1989. Gerald L. Farley ATTEST: Mayor Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. 3979 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ZONING MAP WITH RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM R-1 TO B-3 (BUSINESS RETAIL AND SERVICE) DISTRICT AND GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WHEREAS, AMOCO OIL COMPANY (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner), has filed an application to rezone the property commonly known as 1690 East Euclid Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as follows: The South 175 feet of the North 225 feet of the West 175 feet of the East 225 feet of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, the application filed by the Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned from R-1 to B-3 (Business Retail and Service) with a Special Use Permit for an automobile service station; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning (designated as ZBA Case No. 44-Z-88) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 7th day of July, 1988, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 20th day of June, 1988; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered the request being the subject of ZBA 44-Z-88 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The official zoning map pertaining to Chapter 14 entitled "Zoning" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to B-3 (Business Retail and Service District), with a Special Use permit for an automobile service station. SECTION THREE: That the Special Use permit granted herein is issue s -Jett to the following conditions: 1. That the food shop be closed to customers from 12:00 A.M. to 6 A.M. 2. That there be no delivery of gasoline from 10:00 P.M. to 8:00 A.M. AMOCO - ZBA 44-Z-88 Page 2 of 2 3. That a 6 foot wood fence finished on both sides be erected on the south and west property lines, 4. That a "No Left Turn" sign be erected at the eaternmost driveway on Euclid Avenue. SECTION FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: Farley, Murauskis, Van Geese, Wattenberg, Floros NAYS: None ABSENT: Arthur PASSED and APPROVED this 20th day of _September 1988. ATTEST: PTO - carol A. FleldS Village Clerk V CarolH. Krause e President ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1690 EAST EUCLID AVENUE IN MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS AND AMENDING ORD INANCE NO. 3980 WHEREAS, AMOCO OIL COMPANY, has filed an application for variations from specified sections of chapter 14 (Zoning) and Chapter 22 (Water, Sewer and Flood Plain Regulations) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect for property commonly known as 1690 East Euclid Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: The South 175 feet of the North 225 feet of the West 175 feet of the East 225 feet of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Section 14.604.B to permit the variations granted in ordinance No. 3980 to be extended for one additional year; and from Section 22.806 to allow a revised site plan to conform to the Illinois Department of Transportation floodway requirements; WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation request (designated as ZBA Case No. 49-V-89) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of July, 1989, pursuant to due and proper legal notice thereof published in the Mount Prosoect Herald on the 12th day of July, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered the variation requested and find that it would be in the best interest of the Village to grant the variation requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 22.806, governing floodplain regulations, to allow a finished floor elevation of one foot (11) above the floodplain level rather than the two feet required and an amendment to Ordinance No. 3980 to extent the effective period of the variations granted therein for an additional period of one year, September 20, 1990. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted IFA7 110" Amoco - ZBA 49-V-89 Page 2 of 2 herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins by September 20, 1990. SECTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16 ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOW AS 1690 EAST EUCLID AVENUE WHEREAS, Amoco Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has requested modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property commonly known as 1690 East Euclid Avenue, legally described as follows; and The South 175 feet of the North 225 feet of the West 175 feet of the East 225 feet of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal meridian in Cook County, Illinois WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider modifications from Section 16.405 as follows: 1. To permit a dry detention basin floor slope of not less than one percent (1%); and 2. To permit a building to be fifty feet (501) from a detention facility rather than the required seventy-five feet (751). WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered the modificationsrequested and find that it would be in the best interest of the Village to grant the modifications requested. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRuSPECI, 200K COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That modifications from the Section 16.405 of the Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect are granted as follows: 1. To permit a dry detention basin floor slope of not less than one percent (1%); and 2. To permit a building to be fifty feet (501) from a detention facility rather than the required seventy-five feet (751). SECTION THREE: That except for the modifications granted herein all other requirements of said Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall apply to the subject property. SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and Amoco Modifications Page 2 of 2 effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: R13*9A ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk 1989. 1-T-tLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPLCT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA47-V-89, EDWIN MUNIZ LOCATION: 1004 WEST LINCOLN DATE: AUGUST 29, 1989 Mr. Muniz initially appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 27, 1989 to request a 0.5 foot side yard setback in order to allow an already installed walkway along the side of the house; and a 5'-6" fence height instead of 5 feet. Mr. Muniz presented his case to the Zoning Board of Appeals stating that he poured a wider concrete walk than allowed due to the fact that a number of homes in the areahad wider walks. The Village staff stated at the hearing that a quick survey of the neighborhood did not reveal any expanded patios or side yard walks similar to that on Mr. Muniz's property. The most pertinent comment from the Village staff dealt with the drainage, The Engineering Department noted that the drainage flow is from the rear to the front yard and, with this newly constructed sidewalk located at a higher level than the original grade, the flow is impeded forcing it onto the neighbor's lot. However, there were no structures near the lot line next door that would be adversely effected by this surface drainage. The Inspection Services Department noted that the sidewalk was installed illegally since it was not constructed according to the permit (36" wide maximum, 4' from the property line). Neighbors were present at the hearing to voice their objections based on drainage and the reduced setback. Village staff had originally verified that the walk was less than 1 foot away from the property line. Mr. Muniz stated that the walk was 22" from the property line and would not cause any drainage problems. As a result of the discrepancy, the Zoning Board of Appeals suggested that this case be continued to August 10, at which time Village staff would be able to re -visit the site and determine the actual setback from property line and drainage problem, if any. John Fulton Dixon - Page 2 August 29, 1989 On August 10, the Village staff brought the Board up-to-date on the circumstances surrounding the case. The actual setback of the sidewalk from the property line was verified at .77 feet and, as constructed, would impede the drainage flow from the rear yard to the front yard, It was recommended by the Village Engineer that 2 or 3 feet of the existing sidewalk should be cut back in order to restore a proper drainage swale. Once again, the neighbors were present to voice their objections to this sidewalk case. Some members of the Zoning Board of Appeals questioned the actions of Mr. Muniz in installing a sidewalk width in excess of what was authorized by the building permit. The Board then voted to approve a 3'-3" sideyard setback by a vote of 6-0. The Board also voted to approve the 5.5 foot high scalloped fence by a vote of 5-1. That decision is final and needs no further action by the Village Board. PB:hg Approved: favid -Mclements, Director 57C NOflTH EISTON AVENUE CIIM RTIFIEb SURVEY COO 75.2 ! CHICAGO, ILLINOIS EEE4E �n i� iii 'ijy ■ // P1°w: )7s 775 FAX / 17s�28s! N PIAT OF SURVEY LOT 17 IN ALFINI'S FIRST ADDITION TO MOUNT PROSPECT, BEING, A SUBDIVISION GF FART OF TIIE SOUIH n90 FFET OF TNF WEST LI OF THE NORTHEAST 1, AND CART OF 111E SOUTH 990 FEET OF TIIE EAST �} OF THE NOR IIIWESi 'K OF WE 710N It, TOWNSHIP 41 No IT", RANGE II, EAST OF 711E TIIIRp PR INGI FAL ITER IDI AN, AfFnROiIEG f0 IIIE FLAT THEREOF REGISTER£0 IN illE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR OF TITLES OF 0001'. f.0Uli1 r, it.L11101S ON OECENDER 7, 1955 AS DOCIJHE14T NUMBER 1,495,955, IN COOK. COUNTY, ILLINOIS. E ," o eS 10,I CT ,Ener xf � ✓ ELef rev SKAJV a 6x /s l' FG4? ,rF/Adm '4C/ Z07 -Ir r Llivelok/ / STTml- ",% N Ert?v ex(n'+ug e„ag sVAVT* I@+AM1EIIR.pMp EMF! M!D EASFMEN IS ULE SIIOYM OM,v YA¢AE iNEY APE 5D PECMroEOMINE WPq.tl}NERmSE ;NMPAPE ALL POM rS REFOrrF PNI.gND By SANE fN0 PT ONCE M1Ffpnl �CEILC Nie^nrrrq'L'yn�w �O-ft �gyryj-404 ISIPuu roN rµ•,"5 "'""r119 /E AtlPN .d/f A", INEFEPENCE oN5 fnF NOt 10 PE aeSUMEb FnOM SGI.tMp OacMnMf M Pbol wM mNr �A+yam caA"%P' k $Ie1R OI RIInDIf --d#9eR1 N� J ✓!b A'!a/ II—N i,sibrrf IMmN $ ��' r`,. �!P C—'y DI CObk "vnXl m.I 41.I b.T• RJ+N' T.}• eT. E' e'Wf6a D'00 At"M e OGG NE sr Nk, CEFITIFIED SUTIVEr CO do I -eh, ce,:ly IbM - ha- eurvEyd 0 Rbore de5crlbed MODeri, and Thal the DIM hereon d— IP b CM -1 rCDreYenlatlVn of eald ewreA L989 m+vE' m-'• G''�{SUST`i°cA"u�e MKF p tDO. n. ^^'-?.�...,... /� „r ✓, /' ,/' AM04, dre, "51 e<xnws Ae> ell STORY BR/Cff % A tlf>%K'-RE ry/Q<CE 60R„Rt/X �'�. '` zE °�""Ar ✓✓✓ /,. PES/DENCE AT ' L01c t— ,A✓.G', '1Zw"4 FE'+✓c'E" ,,,, 4 ,✓"''”, " Auld '„s ,� AM"✓Ii'Z +v A,-.11rw cl,,�dssr SxrsY ,eK^k” .9i"R' Zd / ��qq�� C.9E./ 0' AEC.: r9i 0' ti'CrGKr / R9 SOUrN o.G EAST Llivelok/ / STTml- ",% N Ert?v ex(n'+ug e„ag sVAVT* I@+AM1EIIR.pMp EMF! M!D EASFMEN IS ULE SIIOYM OM,v YA¢AE iNEY APE 5D PECMroEOMINE WPq.tl}NERmSE ;NMPAPE ALL POM rS REFOrrF PNI.gND By SANE fN0 PT ONCE M1Ffpnl �CEILC Nie^nrrrq'L'yn�w �O-ft �gyryj-404 ISIPuu roN PEPER TO roNR OEED OP APBIP,ICi INEFEPENCE oN5 fnF NOt 10 PE aeSUMEb FnOM SGI.tMp OacMnMf M Pbol wM mNr �A+yam .�„�"” � $Ie1R OI RIInDIf II—N i,sibrrf IMmN $ ��' r`,. �!P C—'y DI CObk "vnXl m.I 41.I b.T• RJ+N' T.}• eT. E' IS. �� Nk, CEFITIFIED SUTIVEr CO do I -eh, ce,:ly IbM - ha- eurvEyd 0 Rbore de5crlbed MODeri, and Thal the DIM hereon d— IP b CM -1 rCDreYenlatlVn of eald ewreA L989 m+vE' m-'• G''�{SUST`i°cA"u�e tDO. n. ,5........6....�(•l,K�-YL DED ILL Land GO— MINUTE4S OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 47-V-89 Hearing Date: AUGUST 10, 1989 PETITIONER: Edwin Muniz PUBLICATION DATE: July 12, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1004 Lincoln street REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a variation from section 14-1102.8.1 to allow a .5 foot side yard setback for a walk/patio area instead of 8 feet required. Also requested is a variation from Section 21.601. to allow 51 611 maximum fence height instead of 5 feet. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gil Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Ron Cassidy Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Len Petrucelli OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: Joan Robertson Jim Anderson The case was continued from the July 27, 1980 Zoning Board hearing. Paul Bodnar, planner for the Villager brought the boa up to date on the circumstances surrounding the case. Paul, along with the village engineer visited the prIY operty and relaye the Village engineers opinion that the side Valk should be cut back at least two to three feet in order to restore a drainage Swale near the property line. Paul also reviewed building permit records and found that the inspections set up for two separate Saturday mornings were canceled by the home owner. The petitioner stated that he canceled the first inspection but the second was canceled by the Village because the concrete was scheduled to be poured and there was not an inspector available. The Petitioner proceeded to state that recent heavy rain fall had not produced as much as a I" puddle of rain on the surrounding property and saw no other Way to better state his case. Joan Robertson of 1002 Lincoln objected to the patio because of potential drainage problems and the possible erection of an awning or sun roof which would increase drainage on her property, possibly causing flooding. Jim Anderson of 333 N. Central pointed out that in the minutes of the last hearing stated that applicant informed the Zoning ..Board that the walk was 22 inches from the property line. The staff memo states the walk is .77' from the property ;line. Mr. ,Anderson also sited the possibility of installing a roof over the patio in support of Mrs. Robertson's objection. The Board, Gil Basnik in particular, questioned the actions of Mr. Muniz stating that he had acted beyond the scope of his approved permit. Not only did he disregard the approved dimensions, but also failed to consider how the enlarged patio would effect his neighbors. Peter Lannon stated that he had visited the sight after the rain this afternoon and saw no run off on the neighbors property. Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant petitioners request to allow 3' 3" side yard. setback. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. The Board proceeded to grant the variation from Section 14.1102.B.,1 Upon roll call: Ayes: Basnik, Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager and O'May. Nays: None By a vote of -0, the motion passed. Village board action will be required in this case. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant petitioners request to allow from Section 21.601 allowing a'51 6" fence. Jane M. Pietr ykowski objected to the fence stating that it would abut against a fence she had installed earlier. Because two adjacent fences are not prohibited in the Zoning Ordinance the Board could not exclude it. Mrs Pietrzykowski was instructed to file an appeal to the Village Board if the fence height is a concern. Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Basnik, Cassidy and Brettrager'. Nays: O'May. The Zoning Board is Final in this case C..�;ichard �hnson . Recording Secretary TTI AGE OF MOUNT PROSF PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMESt Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C � 7g:T7 FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA47-V-89, EDWIN MUNIZ LOCATION: 1004 WEST LINCOLN DATE: AUGUST 3, 1989 As directed by the Board, the Village Engineering Department and I inspected this walk to verify the distance from the side property line and the drainage. We found that the survey, dated April 19, 1989 and presented to you at the hearing, is correct. This survey shows the edge of the concrete being .77 feet west of the property line. It was also apparent that a portion of the original concrete, which would have extended over the east property line, was removed. The Engineer still has concerns with the drainage on this property. It is his o -inion *hat all of the drainage from the rear of Mr. Muniz' property will flow into his n-.iL-.,, or's de yard and flow south to Lincoln Street. The best way to alleviate this problem is to cut an additional 2 to 3 feet of the concrete walk and restore the original drainage swale. I also looked through the building permit files for this particular property to gain some background on the events that occurred. I found a permit that was issued to Mr. Muniz which indicated a 3 foot wide walk to be placed 4 foot away from the east property line. A copy of this permit is attached. I also found records indicating that Mr. Muniz cancelled two Saturday inspections on two separate occasions. PB:hg Eric. MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-47-V-89 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: July 27, 1989 Edwin Muniz 1004 West Lincoln July 12, 1989 A variation from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 0.5 foot side yard setback in order to allow a patio. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Marilyn O'May Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Len Petrucelli Joan Robertson, 1002 W. Lincoln J. Pietrzykowski Edwin Muniz, (petitioner), 1004 West Lincoln stated that he wished to extend his side patio walk due to the fact that 16 homes in the area currently have wider walks than he had. He also wished to extend the height of his fence to 5'-5" due to the fact that his dog would be able to jump over a 4 foot fence. Paul Bednar, Village Planner, stated that the neighbor to the east, which would be the most affected neighbor, does not have anything in their 20 foot setback that may be impacted negatively from the extended concrete. 'Mr. Bednar also noted that a quick survey of the neighborhood did not find any expanded patios or side yard walks. The Engineering and Inspection Services report which Mr. Bednar felt was most pertinent to this case, showed that drainage flow was from the rear to the front yard. The constructed sidewalk is located at a higher level than original grade. This would impede drainage and would cause drainage onto the neighbor's lot. It was also noted that the sidewalk in question had been installed illegally as it had not been constructed according to the permit. Therefore, any hardship Mr. Muniz bad was self-inflicted. Mr. Bednar stated that the Village had no problem with Mr. Muniz's fence request. Case No. ZBA-47-V-89 Page 2 of 2 Ms. Joan Robertson, 1002 West Lincoln, stated that she was the next door neighbor to the east of Mr. Muniz. She objected to the variation request stating that her main concern was the drainage problem. Ms. Robertson also mentioned that the size of fence had not caused a problem in the past with previous owners of dogs, and that the fences in the rest of the neighborhood are the same height, she wondered why Mr. Muniz could not keep his fence within the Village Code limit. of 5 feet. J. Pietrzykowski, who is the back yard neighbor of Mr. Muniz, objected to the variation request due to the height of the fence and the fact that his fence was to be constructed abutting her fence. Edwin Muniz, petitioner, was then allowed to rebut. Mr. Muniz stated that be did originally receive a iermit for a 3 foot sidewalk, however, after noting similar sidewalks in the rest of the nei.,hborhood and their greater size, he decided to enlarge his sidewalk over the IV permitted width of 3 feet. Mr. Muniz stated that he waited for an inspector on the day of his appointment, when he did not show up, he poured the concrete anyway. He stated that the walk is about 22" from the property line. Mr. James T. Anderson, Jr., 333 North Central, debated the distance the sidewalk was from the property line of Ms. Robertson, the neighbor to the east. He felt the sidewalk was closer to the property line than Mr. Muniz; had mentioned. Mr. Anderson was concerned about the drainage problems. After some discussion with Paul Bednar and the petitioner, Mr. Muniz, Mr. Basnik suggested that this case be continued until August 10, by which time the Village Engineer will have been able to visit the site where it will be determined the degree of conformity or non -conformity. The petitioner was in agreement. Step M. McNellis John Ratcliffe Jackson Recording Secretary R ecording STetary , "LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSP. .T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD PEALS IRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLWANNE7 SUBJECT: ZBA47-V-89, EDWIN MUNIZ LOCATION: 1004 WEST LINCOLN DATE: JULY 20, 1989 REQUES The applicant is requesting variations from the Zoning Code including: 1. Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a 0.5 foot side yard setback for a wide sidewalk/patio instead of an 8 foot setback required by Code, 2. Section 21.601 to allow a 5.5 foot fence height instead of 5 feet allowed by Code. Both the Engineering and Inspection Services Departments have serious concerns with regards to drainage in this side yard. As per the approved drainage plan for this property, the flow is from the rear yard to the front yard. Because the sidewalk/patio has already been installed and appears to be at a higher grade than what the original grade was, it is impeding the drainage patterns. For this reason, the Village staff does not recommend approval. The Inspection Services Department notes that a permit was issued to install a 3 foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of the house. Upon an inspection, it was found that the "walk" was 10 feet wide at some points. Mr. Muniz, vas then instructed by the Village inspectors to remedy the situation. With regards to the fence height, Village staff had no comments. Mr. Muniz lives in a ranch home in a single family neighborhood. The neighbor to the east has a home located approximately 20 feet away from the property line. There are no patios, decks or walks on the neighbor's property adjacent to Mr. Muniz. The applicant must state his hardship for the side yard setback request. It is our opinion that he has created his own hardship by constructing this "walk/patio" area that did not conform to Code nor to the approved building permit. A brief drive-through the immediate neighborhood indicated no other similar walk/patios. Because of the concerns expressed by other Village staff regarding the drainage flow along the property line, we also cannot support this request. The fence height variation being minimal as it is does not pose a problem to us. In summary, the side yard setback request is a problem because 1) the drainage flow has been redirected by the installation of this concrete and 2) the hardship is self inflicted. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1004 WEST LINCOLN 9TREET WHEREAS, Edwin E. Muniz (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for a variation from certain provisions of Chapter 14 of the village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 1004 West Lincoln Street (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 17 in Alfini's First Addition to Mount Prospect, being a Subdivision of part of the South 990 feet of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 and part of the south 990 feet of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois on Decer '.-- 2, 1953 as Document Number 1496955 in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.8.1 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a three foot three inch (31 311) side yard setback instead of the required eight feet and a variation from Section 21.601 to permit a fence height of five feet six inches (51 611); WHEREAS, a public hearings were held on the variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 47-V-89 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of July, 1989 and the 10th day of August, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of July, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 21.605 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals is final as it relates to the height of fences except when an Appeal is filed within fifteen days of the date the Zoning Board of Appeals made their decision; and WHEREAS, an Appeal was filed from the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals relative to the height of the fence requested under ZBA Case No. 47-V-89, pursuant to Section 14.604.D of the Village Code of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did consider the Appeal from the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals as it relates to the fence height being requested in ZBA 47-V-89; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect did concur with the decision of the Zoning Board of a ZBA 47-V-89 Page 2 of 2 Appeals to grant the request for a five foot 6 inch (51 611) fence height as requested in ZBA 47-V-89. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a three foot three inch (31 311) side yard setback and to permit a fence height of five feet six inches (51 611) for the Subject Property, subject to the Petitioner meeting the permitted 31 311 side yard setback within thirty (30) days following the passage of this Ordinance. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance and the Petitioner conforming to the 31 311 side yard setback granted herein within thirty (30) days following the passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk '1989. -VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER. SUBJECT: ZBA.51.V.89, AIROOM, INC./MR. & MRS. SHEMORSKE LOCATION: 128 S. WAVERLY DATE: AUGUST 29, 1989 Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske are requesting a variation to allow a 3'-6" side yard setback instead of 6.5 foot in order to expand the attached garage. Dick Wasserberg of Airooln, Inc, represented the homeowners in this case at a August 10, 1989 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. He stated that the owners wanted more storage space and an extra parking stall in the garage. There is no other way to put a two -car garage on this property other than to expand the existing garage. He presented a number of letters from surrounding neighbors supporting this request and also produced pictures of homes in the area with similar two -car garages. Village staff presented their opinion that the applicant's proposed addition is the most logical alternative for providing additional parking, if more than a one -car garage is necessary. They also pointed out that there was no evidence of similar side yard variances in the neighborhood. Staff also noted that Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske agreed to remove an existing metal shed that is currently located to the rear of the house. After a brief discussion, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously, 6-0, to approve this request conditioned upon the removal of the existing metal shed. There were no neighbors or objectors present to voice their concerns in regards to this case. PB: fig David M. Clements, Director MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 51-V-89 Hearing Date: August 10, 1989 PETITIONER: Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske PUBLICATION DATE: July 12, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 128 South Waverly REQUEST: The applicant is requesting variation from Section 14-1102.B.1 to allow a 3' 6" side yard instead of 61 610 feet in order to expand the attached garage. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gil Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Len Petrucelli OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: None Dick Wasserburg of Airoom Inc., distributed documents and pictures in order to explain the petitioners case. Neighbors to the north south and several across the street reviewed the petitioners request. The signatures of these neighbors were included on a letter stating their support of the request. He went On to state that 9 homes in the area currently that have two car garages. He produced Pictures of home which will be most affected by the addition. The north elevation of this home has only one window in the basement. The home owner had no objections to the garage according to Mr. Wasserburg. Other neighbors felt that the Petitioners addition would improve the property value of the home. Mr. Wasserburg stated that upon evaluation of the Village recommendations, that although reasonable, cost and aesthetic issues would not warrant following them. John Jackson, Intern Planner for the Village of Mount Prospect, sited the existing regulations regarding the property. He saw evidence Of similar side yard variances in the neighborhood. staff feels that the petitioners addon is the most logical alternative for providing additional parking if the board is of the opinion that a 1 car garage is a hardship. The Shemorske's] agreed to remove an existing metal shed that currently is located less than lot from the house. Sil Basnik requested a motion to grant petitioners proposal for 'variation of Section 14.1102.B.1. to allow a 31 611 side yard instead of 611 611 in order to expand the attached garage conditioned with the removal of the existing metal shed. Moved by O'May, seconded by Brettrager. Upon roll call: AYES: Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May and Basnik. By a vote of 6-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. 'Richard J,.- Jbhnson Recording Secretary : LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPLf PLANMNG AM ZOMNG DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS RMAN FROM: JOHN R. JACKSON, INTERN SUBJECT: ZBA-51-V-89, AIROOM, INC./MR. 81 MRS. SHEMORSKE LOCATION: 128 S. WAVERLY DATE: AUGUST 3, 1989 L_] � The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 3'-6" side yard setback instead of 6.5 foot in order to construct a garage/living area addition. VILLAGE STAB COMMENTS Both Engineering and Inspection Services Departments note that the drainage patterns along the 'north property line must not be altered. The Inspection Services Department also noted that the, :)!ars ubmitted with the zoning application 'do not meet all Codes, specifically, the Fire'Prevention Code. Building plans must be submitted for review and approval before building permits are issued. Building permits will be required prior to any construction. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case. PWMNG AND ZONING_COMMENTS This Property is located at mid -block on South Waverly Avenue between Busse Avenue and Cleven. Other homes on this block share similar lot sizes and configuration as well as similar building layouts. The residents are located in an R-1 Single Family District which requires a 30 foot front yard and 6 1/2 foot side yards on each side. A drive through the neighborhood revealed no apparent evidence that other residents had sought relief from required setbacks. Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske, represented by Dick Wasserberg of Airoom, Inc., presently have a home with an attached one -car garage. They are now proposing to build a garage/living area addition that would increase the amount of storage available. Along with the expansion of the garage space, would be an addition of living space at the rear of the garage. The proposed addition would extend 6'-6" to the north of the existing garage putting it 3'-8" from the property line. The current front yard would in no way be Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA-51-V-89 August 3, 1989 altered. However, a setback variation from the side property line is required. The current setback from the existing one -car garage is 10'-3", whereby, the new proposed setback from the two -car garage is 3'-8". There is an approximate setback of 8-6" to this property line from 126 S. Waverly, which is the neighbor to the north. Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske have proposed the new addition in a manner that is in keeping with the character of their home as well as neighboring homes. In our opinion, if the Board is to allow the addition to accommodate a two -car garage, this is the most logical and feasible location for the addition. However, alternatives do exist. One possibility, if the applicants merely wish to increase their storage space, would be to extend the existing garage 3'-8" instead of the requested 6%6", this would allow the garage to conform to the required 6'-6" side yard setback. A second option is to construct a narrow driveway past the existing garage to a detached garage in the rear yard. The current setback from the prop" line is 30'-3" and would allow such a driveway to be constructed. Drawbacks to both of these alternatives include altered building character, increased lot coverage, and added building expense. The neighboring property to the north will be most affected by this proposal, although slightly. Currently, the southern side of the neighbor's home that faces the subject property has only one basement window. The Shemorske's have also agreed to remove the existing metal shed located in their rear yard. The applicant should address the hardship suffered if the 6'-5" setback requirement is met. In summary, if the applicant is allowed to have additional storage anywhere on the property, this is the most logical location. By the character of the addition, the impact on the neighborhood is minimal. The separation between the garage/living space and 126 South Waverly will be approximately 12 feet. The other options available are to reduce the addition so that it would extend 3'-8" instead of the proposed 6%6", maintaining the required setback, or building a detached garage in the rear of the property with the driveway in the sideyard setback. In order for a variance to be granted, the applicant must satisfy the Board that sufficient hardship does exist in this case. JRJ:hg Approved: CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 128 SOUTjJ WAVERLY PLACE WHEREAS, John and Barbara Shemorske (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) has filed an application for a variation from certain provisions of chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 128 South Waverly Place (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 223 in Town We Go Park, Inc., Third Addition, being a Subdivision in the Northwest fractional Quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.B of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a three foot six inch (31 611) side yard setback instead of the 61 611 in order to expand an attached garage; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 51-V-89 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the loth day of August, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 26th day of July, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102.B to allow a three foot six inch (31 611) side yard setback for the Subject Property. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect I ZBA 51-V-89 Page 2 of 2 from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in'the manner provided by law. AYES: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk '1989. N—.-LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPER' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAP, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA-55-V-89, FRANK RUCCI LOCATION: 1707 MYRnE DRIVE DATE: AUGUST 29, 1989 The applicant is requesting a variation to allow a driveway width of 27.5 feet and a 5.75 foot separation between a new patio enclosure and the detached garage. The maximum permitted driveway width is 21 feet and a 10 foot separation is required between structures. Mr. Rucci presented his case before the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 24, 1989. He stated that the patio enclosure was just recently completed. A permit was issued for the patio enclosure by the village but the survey did not show the detached garage. Therefore, the required separation between structures was not an issue at permit approval. Because it is already built, Mr. Rucci needs this variation in order to keep it in this location. Village staff had no major problem with this request, however, the Inspection Services Department requested the installation of Type X drywall in the garage for fire prevention. Mr. Rucci asked the Zoning Board not to require the extra drywall in his already existing garage and the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with his request, A driveway width of 27.5 feet was also requested in order to replace sections of the existing pavement. The Zoning Board had no objection to this request. The Board voted 5-1 to recommend approval for both requests with no conditions attached. Mr. Brettrager cast the one dissenting vote since he was of the opinion that the Class X drywall should be required as a condition of the building separation variation. There were no neighbors or objectors present to voice their concerns for this case. PB:hg Approved: David R. Clements, Director N SURVEY ','LAT TEL. NO. 956-12,24 BAUER SURVEYING 2045 S. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD. SUITE 108-A ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005 Lot 16 In Colonial Heights, First Addition, a Subdivision of part of Lots 5, 6 and 7 In Owner's Division, being a Subdivision of the Southeast quarter (except the West half of the Southwest quarter thereof) of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois. Order No... 89650 D400 June 21r 1989 Ordered By Frank Ruccl Scale I Inch . 20 feet. Distances are shown In fast and decimal parts thereof. COmPWO all Points before budding and An Or" report any difference. Easements and building lines als"n per recorded Subdivision pis," Refer 10 Deed, Title Policy and local Zoning r"ulrWWt$ foe additional building 1IM03 and easement restrictions. at Illinois County at Cook I—Walter H. Bauer Z WALTU X. fisptN' . 0 1 C a Req. at 1, if O. i :it. Land Surveyor do hereby certify that a sur -v at % he above described PMOWY has been made under "yn0, my SUPSMSIOn and that the Plat hereon drawn is a COmOCI reprosanlatlon of said Survey correclea to a lemperstum of 62' Fahrenheit. June 21, 1989 REG. ILL. LAND SURVEYOR NO. 1910 e ed - �1707 Ile 0,0 01 77,60 Order No... 89650 D400 June 21r 1989 Ordered By Frank Ruccl Scale I Inch . 20 feet. Distances are shown In fast and decimal parts thereof. COmPWO all Points before budding and An Or" report any difference. Easements and building lines als"n per recorded Subdivision pis," Refer 10 Deed, Title Policy and local Zoning r"ulrWWt$ foe additional building 1IM03 and easement restrictions. at Illinois County at Cook I—Walter H. Bauer Z WALTU X. fisptN' . 0 1 C a Req. at 1, if O. i :it. Land Surveyor do hereby certify that a sur -v at % he above described PMOWY has been made under "yn0, my SUPSMSIOn and that the Plat hereon drawn is a COmOCI reprosanlatlon of said Survey correclea to a lemperstum of 62' Fahrenheit. June 21, 1989 REG. ILL. LAND SURVEYOR NO. 1910 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 55-V-89 Hearing Date: August 24, 1989 PETITIONER: Frank Rucci PUBLICATION DATE: August 9, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1707 Myrtle Drive REQUEST: Variations from section 14.102-B to allow a patio enclosure to remain 5.75 feet from the detached garage and from Section 14.3016 to allow an existing 27.75 foot driveway width. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gil Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May Len Petrucelli ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTER-.3TED., None Mr. Frank Rucci, 1707 Myrtle Drive, Mount Prospect, Petitioner, stated that a variation is required for the new patio enclosure since an old plat of survey had been submitted and the contractor built the structure too close, allowing a 5.75 foot separation between the patio enclosure and the garage instead of 10 feet. The second variation will be required in order to replace a cracked driveway with an attached patio. The patio, which has existed for 26 years, is counted as part of the drive creating a 27.75 foot driveway width instead of the 21 feet allowed by Code. Mr. Rucci requested that the storage shed be allowed to remain as it exists in the rear yard easement. No utilities are located below ground, just utility lines overhead. No objections have been voiced by neighbors and the building is made of wood and cannot easily be moved. Mr. Rucci also requested that an Inspector check his garage wails to see if the 5/811 drywall is really necessary. The wails consist of plaster board with foil lining, then old siding which was then resided over. ZBA 55-V-89 Page! Two Mr- Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, reiterated the variations needed for the driveway/patio and the patio enclosure. He noted that the 10, separation between structures is for fire safety reasons in order to prevent the spread of fire from one structure to another. The 5/81, type X drywall is a standard request by the Inspection Services Department for this reason. The driveway, in order to comply with Code requirements, would need to have a 6 foot wide section of concrete removed between the house and the usable driveway space. No negative impact is anticipated should it be allowed to remain the way it currently exists. Mr. :Bucci again questioned the neces-,::y of the drywall installation indicating the amount of money curreg,-,1y being spent for this project. Discussion ensued regarding drywall Lastallation, noting that it is an Inspector's standard recommendation specifically for the purpose of fire prevention. ""nairman Basnik stated that the Petitioner has been advised of the drywall installation and the risk will be his if he chooses not to comply. A motion was formulated eliminating the drywall stipulation. Upon motion by Mr. ?etrucelli, seconded by Mr. Lannon, it was moved to grant the variations from Section 14.102.B to allow a patio enclosure to remain 5.75 feet from the detached garage instead of 10 feet normally required as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1 and #2 and from Section 14.3016 to allow an existing 27.75 foot driveway width instead of 21 feet normally allowed by Code as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #I. Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Cassidy, O'May, Basnik Nayes: Brettrager By a vote of 5-1, the motion passed. Mr. Brettrager stated that his no vote was based cn the Fire Department's recommendation not being included in the motion. Village Board action will be required for both requests. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary VALAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC-t PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C AIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA-55-V-89, FRANK RUCCI LOCATION: 1707 MYRTLE DRIVE DATE: AUGUST 17, 1989 Mff Muyi The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016 for a driveway width of 27.75' at the garage door instead of 21 feet as normally allowed. Also requested is a variation from Section 14.'102.13.1 to allow a 5.75 foot separation between a patio enclosure and the detached garage. A 10 foot separation is normally required. The Inspection Services Department notes that a Permit was issued for the construction of the patio enclosure, however, app) -oval was based upon the plat of survey submitted. The survey submitted was incorrect in that the detached garage was not shown. When an inspector made a building inspection of the enclosure, he noted that the separation between garage and enclosure did not meet Code. Mr. Rucci was then directed to obtain a variance. The Inspection Services Department notes that the interior of the existing garage should be reinforced with 5/8" type X drywall, if this variance is approved. This will help the fire rating of the structure if the required 10 foot separation is reduced. The Engineering Department noted that the existing shed at the rear of the property should be moved out of the rear yard easement at this time. The Rucci's live on a standard size lot in an established single family neighborhood. They are proposing to replace a part of their concrete driveval,, N-hich at the present time is a combined drive and patio area at 27 1/2 feet in width. They also had a patio enclosure (225 square feet) recently completed which is just under 6 feet away from their detached garage. As indicated above, a permit was issued for a patio enclosure based upon incorrect information supplied by the petitioner's builder. The major reason for the Code requirement of a 10 foot separation between structures is for fire safety. Neither the Fire Department nor Inspection Services Department have an objection to this request if approval is conditioned upon the requirement of installation of type X drywall in the garage. Planning and Zoning concurs with this opinion. We expect no adverse impact upon the neighborhood as a result of this variation. Gil Basnik - Page 2 August 17, 1989 ZBA-55-V-89 Upon a field inspection of the property, we found the existing 27.5' driveway also being used as patio space by the Rucci's. It is for this reason that a wider width than 21 feet is proposed. The Rucci's have had this situation for a number of years and would like to continue to use the drive as a patio area also. To meet the Code allowances for driveway widths, an approximate 6 foot wide section of concrete would have to be removed between the house and the usable driveway space. It is our opinion that the resultant driveway width would still provide ample maneuvering space for cars, however, it would decrease the existing patio area, Mr. Rucci should address the hardship that may occur if he had to remove this concrete area. In summary, Mr. Rucci's building contractor submitted the wrong information which resulted in the issuance of a permit for a patio enclosure structure less than 10 feet away from the garage. We concur with other Village departments that do not have a problem with a 5.75 foot separation between the two structures. The driveway width could be reduced to meet Code without creating maneuvering problems, however, the existing pavement is not expected to impact the neighborhood if left at its present width. PB:hg CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1707 MYRTLE DRIVE WHEREAS, Frank J. and Modene Rucci (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from certain provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 1707 Myrtle Drive (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 16 in Colonial Heights First Addition, a subdivision of part of Lots 5, 6, and 7 in Owners Division, being a Subdivision of the Southeast Quarter (except the West Half of the Southwest Quarter thereof) of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.102.B of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a five foot nine inch (51 911) separation between the principal structure and an accessory building to allow an enclosed patio and from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway width of twenty-seven feet nine inches (271 9"); and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 55-V-89 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of August, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 9th day of August, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: aECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a five foot 9 inch (51 911) separation between the principal structure and an accessory building subject to a condition of the Petitioner installing fire - rated drywall in the existing garage, as determined by the Department Of Inspection Services and a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a driveway width of twenty-seven feet nine inches (271 919). SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations I ZBA 55-V-89 Page 2 of 2 shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. W**S� NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ',-,A,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL-,4 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA-58-V-89, JOSEPH AND DARLENE HOLIK LOCATION: 808 EDGEWOOD LANE DATE: SEPTEMBER 12, 1989 In March of 1989, Mr. Holik received approval to construct a four -car garage at his home, and a variation of the permitted maximum driveway width to allow a 45 foot driveway to serve the garage. After constructing the garage, Mr. Holik found that a 49'-10" driveway would better serve his needs. Inasmuch as a concrete contractor was scheduled to install the driveway, Mr. Holik went ahead with the wider driveway. He filed this variation application after completing the work. This case was hear' ',y *h', Zoning Board of Appeals on September 7, 1989. Mr. Holik presented his case stating that the Village Board already gave him permission to pour the enlarged driveway but requested he seek the variance from the Zoning Board of Appeals. After a brief discussion, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted to recommend approval by a vote of 5-0. M Approved: a 17 W. KIiN r' .ApAl MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 58-V-89 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: SUBJECT PROPERTY: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: Hearing Date: September 7, 1989 Joseph and Darlene Holik August 22, 1989 808 Edgewood Lane Variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 in order to construct a driveway 49'10" wide instead of the required 21 feet. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Len Petrucelli Peter Lannon Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Lois Brothers Marilyn O'May Lorraine Breitag Ray Etratz Mr. Joseph Holik, 808 Edgewood Lane, Mount Prospect, Petitioner, stated that approximately six months ago, the Zoning Board had approved a four car garage and a 451 driveway. The garage is finished and a decorative wall was placed off to the side about 10 feet east of the new garage wall. Pavement has already been poured up to this new wall. Mr. Holik stated that his hardship was having a drive that narrowed to a one car drive and a street with no curbs, thus causing a safety concern for guest parking. It was noted that the Village Board gave Mr. Holik approval approximately six weeks ago for this added wing to the driveway, subject to going through the Zoning Board for such a variance. Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that the Mr. Holikts hardship was guest parking and according to staff's figures, at least 10 guest parking spaces would be available on the driveway. The brick wing -wall does not necessitate asphalt pavement in front of it, and could be attractively landscaped. It is staff's opinion that a 49,101, driveway width is unnecessary for this property. Mr. Petrucelli pointed out the area the home is located in, the size and setback of the property, and the fact that the pavement is already poured. He indicated his support for this request. ZBA 58-V-89 Page Two Ms. Lorraine Breitag, 808 S. Edgewood Lane, Mount Prospect, neighbor across the street, indicated her severe water problem and questioned whether Mr. Holik's drive would add to an already serious drainage problem. Staff was questioned and it was noted that Mr. Holik's driveway was installed according to Engineeringrequirements. It would not add to the drainage problem. Mr. Ray Efratz, 804 S. Edgewood Lane, Mount Prospect, supported Mr. Holik's driveway and stated that the drainage and water conditions have existed since the property was purchased in 1951 and the new drive has not contributed to the problem. Mr. Lannon stated that the problem is not with the driveway, but with not having curbs to channel the water flow. Staff was directed to have someone from the Engineering Department contact Ms. Breitag to discuss the situation. Upon motion by Mr. Brettrager, seconded by Mr. Petrucelli, it was moved to grant a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 in order to construct a driveway 491101, wide instead of the required 21 feet allowed by Code as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1. Upon roll call: Ayes Petrucelli Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik Nayes: None By vote of 5-1, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary —LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPki,-f PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA-58-V-89, JOSEPH AND DARLENE HOLIK LOCATION: 808 EDGEWOOD LANE DATE: AUGUST 30, 1989 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016.A-3 to allow a 49'-10" driveway width instead of 21 feet allowed by Code. VILLACIE ffAEF COMMENTS There were no comments or objections received from Village staff regarding this case. PLANNINIG AND ZONING COMMEhn As you may recall, Mr. Holik was before the Zoning Board of Appeals earlier this year and received approval for a four -car garage and a 45 foot driveway width at the garage per Ordinance No. 4032. Approximately six weeks ago, Mr. Holik approached the Village Board and asked for permission to increase the driveway width to 49'-10". The Village Board gave him permission to do so but conditioned approval upon Mr. Holik going before the Zoning Board to request a variation to do such. In this application, Mr. Holik cites as his hardship for the extra driveway width the fact that guests should not park on the street. According to the submitted site plan, there is enough room to park four cars in the new garage, five cars in front of the garage and at least five more on the length of the driveway. Is it a true hardship if only ten spaces for guests are provided on Mr. Holik's property? We are not convinced that there is a hardship in this case to justify this request. The fact that a brick wing -wall extends 10 feet east of the new garage wall does not necessitate asphalt pavement in front of it. The area in front of the new brick wall could be attractively landscaped. The 45 foot driveway width that was approved earlier this year should be more than adequate. In summary, MT. Holik was granted permission to install a generous 45 foot wide driveway earlier this year. In our opinion, the new 49'-10'' width is not necessary for this property. We cannot foresee a hardship resulting if this variation is denied. PB:bg I LAGE OF MOUNT PROSP&-T PIANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER DATE: SEPTEMBER 7, 1989 SUBJECT: COURTS OF KENNICOTT LOTS 2, 3, 6, 18 AND 20 B -BOX EASEMENTS The owners of the above identified lots and the Village of Mount Prospect are requesting that a one to two foot easement be granted so that 13 -Boxes (service connections) serving these lots can be utilized and maintained by the Public Works Department. These easements are adjacent to the Village's 10' public utility and drainage easement which is along the Kennicott Place Road right-of-way. Please see the attached map for further details on the location of these easements. The requested easements became necessary when Engineering staff found that the contractor had in:.: ,crt?r,.,Iy installed B -Boxes for these lots on private property. The individual homeowners of these lots were informed by the developer, Courtyards Construction, of this error and that the developer was willing to have an additional easement prepared to correct the problem at the developers expense. These owners have accepted the developers offer and agreed to grant the Village a water service easement. One other property on Kennicott Place has a similar problem and is considering providing the Village an easement. All other lots on Kennicott Place have service connections in the proper location in the Village's road right-of-way. The Plan Commission heard these items during their regular meeting on Wednesday, September 6, and recommended that all five easements ire approved by a vote of 7-0. Staff had reviewed these easements and had no objections to their approval. MES:hg Approved: David M. Cleme" nts, Director or 20, 02* C. Ara r aiONNQUIST 20 uj 2 10 FT. EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC a UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE WITH A I FT. ADDITION FOR PUBLIC 2 is WATER SERVICES. 3 17 4 10 Fr. EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES AND DRAINAGE WITH A FT ADDITION FOR PUBLtcts WATER SERVICES. LEM2 15 z w 14 Ile 12 10 RA 44c z —77!- GOL RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN COOK COUNTY BALEFILL DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes that solid waste disposal is entering into a crisis situation; and WHEREAS, the solid waste problem has been significantly heightened with no major relief forthcoming; and WHEREAS, the solid waste disposal crisis impacts local governments and their residents and comprehensive solutions to this regional problem must come from cooperation between local governments; and WHEREAS, the member communities of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County have developed such a comprehensive solution which includes the largest recycling effort in the State of Illinois and calls for the development of a Balefill in unincorporated Hanover Township; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has been an active and longstanding participant in the efforts of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County and its predecessor, the Northwest Municipal Conference, to alleviate the solid waste crisis; and WHEREAS, the SoliWaj",.9 Agency of Northern Cook County has submitted a detailed development application to the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency; and WHEREAS, that application incorporates the recommendations of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect strongly supports the balefill and all aspects of the revised application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SF,CTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect urges approval of the Balefill Development Permit by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect is hereby instructed to certify and forward a copy of Resolution to the Director of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency for inclusion in the public record of the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency. SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of September, 1989. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor I Phone 312 / 392-6000 AGENDA SIGN REVIEW BOARD Monday, September 18, 1989 Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. SJGN-10-$9, Bakers ar Re taurant 13 -West Rand Road A request by Bakers Square Restaurant to seek a Special Use Equity Option (Section 7.330.D) to permit a freestanding sign adjacent to their Rand Road site with a zero foot front and side yard setback instead of the required 60 foot interior yard setback (Section 7.305.A.5, Table 1); an appeal from staffs interpretation of a "mansard sign or wall sign" (Section 7.801); and a 25`/�b variation in height of a freestanding sign (if permitted by the Sign Review Board) from 12 feet to 15 feet. MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W ARTHUR MARK W BUSSE TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN LEO FLOPOS GEORGE A VAN GEEM THEODORE J WATTENSERG Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60055 CAROL A. FIELDS Phone 312 / 392-6000 AGENDA SIGN REVIEW BOARD Monday, September 18, 1989 Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. SJGN-10-$9, Bakers ar Re taurant 13 -West Rand Road A request by Bakers Square Restaurant to seek a Special Use Equity Option (Section 7.330.D) to permit a freestanding sign adjacent to their Rand Road site with a zero foot front and side yard setback instead of the required 60 foot interior yard setback (Section 7.305.A.5, Table 1); an appeal from staffs interpretation of a "mansard sign or wall sign" (Section 7.801); and a 25`/�b variation in height of a freestanding sign (if permitted by the Sign Review Board) from 12 feet to 15 feet. MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SIGN REVIEW BOARD August 21, 1989 CALL TO ORDER: The regular meeting of the Sign Review Board (SRB) was called to order by Chairperson Thulin at 7:45 p.m. Monday, August 21, 1989 at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL: Members of the SRB present: Hal Predovich, Warren Kostak, Thomas Borelli and Chairperson Adelaide Thulin. Village staff present was Paul Bednar. Chairperson Thulin declared a quorum present. Also present, were Lawrence Berkley, David Weinstein, George Iny, Van Epstein, and Edward Vasconcelles representing Madigan's Apparel Store. NEW BUSINESS: Y�ZYA The Madigan's Apparel Store seeks to vary the Sign Ordinance to apply for a special use equity option to install two wall signs instead of one adjacent to a street (Sections 7.305.B, 7.330.1) and 7.720). 17he proposed sign would read "Madigans' for Men Madigans' Juniors" and would be installed on a sign band canopy above the exterior entrance to the new store at Randburst Shopping Center. Signage is 57 square feet in area, they would be allowed up to 102 square feet of exterior signage. The petitioners made their case to the Sign Review Board that there is an identity crisis with the Madigan's Stores. They stated that they need two separate signs; one to identify "Madigans' for Merl" and the other to identify "Madigans' Juniors", in order to differentiate what is essentially two separate stores in one. Mr. Vasconcelles from the Rouse-Randhurst Shopping Center also supported that claim, stating that to have only a sign stating "Madigans'" at the front door would be misleading because there is no Madigans' women's apparel store inside. It was stated by the petitioner that no other Madigan stores in this area have the signs combined; they are always identified as separate stores with separate signage. Therefore, they felt it would be confusing to any shopper. The petitioner also stated that they could have used up to 207 square feet if they put a sign up on the exterior wall rather than the canopy, and even by using the canopy, they're using less square footage than what they normally would be allowed. Mr. Predovich asked the petitioners whether the "Madigans' for Men" and "Madigans' Juniors" were trademarks. The petitioners responded saying that the word "Madigans", is a trademark, the identities "Madigans' for Men" and "Madigans' Juniors" aren't trademarks yet, however, there is a trademark pending. Sign Review Board Minutes August 21, 1989 Page 2 Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village;, summarized the staff comments regarding this request. Staff suggested that the sign could be modified to read "Madigan' for Men and Juniors" with which it would be considered a single sign and there would be no need for a special use equity option;, The Sign Review Board members discussed the matter briefly. Mr. Predovich stated that be was able to justify approval of this request based upon the fact that the two signs are unique and that they attract two different markets; and also that the two signs are now in the process of becoming two separate trademarks. Other Board membershad no problem with the request. There was then a motion to approve the, request of Madigan's Apparel Store, and approved by a unanimous vote of 4.0. Other business was then discussed. Members of the Sign Review Board asked the staff what the status of all previous Board minutes were. It was asked if there was an ordinance that was written up and put into effect after the request was approved by the Sign Review Board and they also asked staff to investigate the proper make -bp of the Sign Review Board; essentially does the vacant seat need to be filled by a professional consultant? All these questions were to be reviewed by staff and responded to at the next meeting. ADJOURNMENT: There being no other business to be conducted, the meeting adjourned at 8:30 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Pa l Bednar, 1?lanner Phone 312 / 392-6000 A G E N D A MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Regular Meeting September 20, 1989 Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 8:00 P. M. I. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL MAYOR APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 MEETING IV. GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES at Wildwood RALPH W ARTHUR cul-de-sac MARK W 13USSE and lot depth for Lots 2, 3, 6 and 7 TIMOTHY J. CORCORAN V. COMMITTEE REPORTS LEO FLOROS A. Community Development Committee Mr. GEORGE R. VAN GEEM THEODORE J. WATTENBEFIG Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER C. Development Code Committee Mr. JOHN FULTON DIXON D. Text Amendment Committee Mr. VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 CAROL A. FIELDS A. Discussion of Fair Housing ordinance Phone 312 / 392-6000 A G E N D A MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Regular Meeting September 20, 1989 Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 8:00 P. M. I. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 MEETING IV. SUBDIVISIONS A. Pate Is Resubdivision, 1000 Cardinal Lane at Wildwood AND Development Code Modifications to cul-de-sac length, parkway trees, sidewalk on cul-de-sac bulb and lot depth for Lots 2, 3, 6 and 7 V. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Community Development Committee Mr. Richardson B. Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern C. Development Code Committee Mr. Kloster D. Text Amendment Committee Mr. Velasco VI. OLD BUSINESS A. Discussion of Fair Housing ordinance B. Discussion of Low -Income Housing VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Mount Prospect Bike Route Brochure VIII. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Donald -Weibel at 8:00 P.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL Present upon Roll Call: Absent: Village Staff Present: Press Staff Present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES Frank Boege Frank Breitsameter Lynn Kloster Tom McGovern Errol Richardson Louis Velasco Donald Weibel, Chairman Tom Borrelli William Navigato Michael Sims, Staff Planner T.D. Roche Taegel, Mt. Prospect Journal Mr. Richardson moved, and seconded by Mr. Boege, that the minutes of August 16, 1989 be approved. All members voted Aye and Chairman Weibel declared the minutes approved. SUBDIVISIONS The owners of Lots 2,3,6,18 and 20 in the Court of Kennicott and the Village of Mt. Prospect requested that a one foot easement be granted so that B -Boxes serving these lots could be utilized and maintained by the Public Works Department. Mr. Velasco moved, and Mr. Richardson seconded, that the request be approved and the Chairman and Secretary be authorized to sign the linen. All members voted Aye and the Chairman declared the motion passed. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Community Development: No report B. Comprehensive Plan: No report C. Development Code: No report D. Text Amendment: No report PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2 SEPTEMBER 6, 1989 NEW BUSINESS A discussion on Fair Housing was scheduled and Mr. Owen Thomas, Executive Director and Mr. Paul Fischer, Vice Chairman of the Evanston Human Relations Commission were present to discuss their experience and knowledge on fair housing enforcement. Mr. Thomas briefly reviewed Evanston'sexperience since it enacted a Fair Housing ordinance in 1981. The Human Relations Commission created under the 1981 ordinance a separate judicial acting body that hears complaints, makes the final decisions and levy fines. Staff first tries to conciliate complaints but if this fails the complaint goes to the Commission. A second way for complaints to be generated is by Staff. In this regard Mr. Thomas said that a fair housing audit was performed in 1984 and in 1987. As a result of the 1987 audit, 10 firms were found with minor violations and 5 firms with more serious violations. Both Thomas and Fischer expressed the opinion that an autonomous body was needed to carry out the fair housing ordinance. They recommended that consideration be given to establishing a commission with policy making and final decision powers. There was discussion on whether or not Mt. Prospect had a fair housing problem. There was some divergence of opinion on this and Mr. Fischer stated that the only way to really determine this was to do an audit. He suggested that Mt. Prospect might do an audit, using the testing method, for research purposes only. He recom- mended that audit discussions be done in executive session, how- ever, it was questioned if that was legal. Mr. Thomas cautioned that the handicapped category should not be overlooked. Chairman Weibel and the Commission members thanked the gentlemen from Evanston for taking time from their busy schedules to appear .before the Commissionand give it the benefit of their experience. Mr. Dinesh Atreya, a Mt. Prospect resident, realtor with Northwest Realty and Northwest Suburban Board of Realtors, Inc. was also present at the meeting. He commented that during his experience as realtor for a number of years in Mt. Prospect he had not seen any ..air housing violations or indications of housing discrimination. He distributed to the Commission members a package of Fair Housing Compliance Program material prepared by the Northwest Suburban Board of Realtors, Inc. that is utilized by local realty firms. Chairman Weibel thanked him for his appearance at the meeting. Mr. McGovern brought up a point on resubdivision. Under current ordinance when a home owners property falls on two lots of record he must resudivide to bring the property into one lot of record. Mr. McGovern contended that there is no need for this and that it places an unwarranted hardship on the homeowner. Chairman Weibel said this should be addressed at the next Commission meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Chairman declared the meeting closed at 9:55 P.M. Respectfully submitted Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary MOUNT PROSPECT RECYCLING COMMISSION MEETING September 21, 1989 at 7:30 PM Village Hall, Tursutee's Room AGENDA I. Call to Order II. Approval of Minutes - August Meeting III. Old Business A. Letter to Citizens Utilities B. Recycling Bins at Park District C. School Education - video D. Local/Joint M " unicipal letter(s) to Newspapers E, Recycling Totals F. Solid Waste Complaint System IV. New Business A. Yard Waste B. Procurement (Village) C. Plastics D. Paper Market 's9TT4 PUP qTpqdse lqsniq IseAvaT '9492DUOD Isbol 1paToAosa eq o4 sTVTI84VW buTmOTTO; eql 10; apeul sav s4jo33a 'saesA TV29A9S aoj paoi-40eld '990uR4suT Auiew UT 'seg 4u9tu4xed9Cj s)IaOI4 DTlqnd 9144 S9T4TAT40P buTTOAD92 snOTaRA 844 uo saeqweLu UOTSSTWWOO peuaqqbTTu9 O*sTP ' qaSH -sXoniq w44 4bT9M 04 4qbTS UO S9TeOs 9Aeq 4OU PTP TTTJPUPT 9XVI PJeTTPW 4R44 UOTSSTMWOD 844 04 P9uTeTdxa sXaeM -aw AgunoO XooD ujeq4joN go Aouaby 84seR PTTOS 944 aO; buTa99uTbua XOT24ed Aq pe4onpuoo A9Aans wO2; e49P 9zTTT4n se TTOm SV 's0T4sT4Vls UTeqqo o4 jag qoe4uoo 04 9ae 3394S SXIOM OTTqnd *Tpob UOTS29ATP 94slem ssesse o-4 9TqP eq you PTnom 9bvTTTA 044 V4PP STt!l 4no44TM 'wV914s 94s9m TVT4u9PTsaa 8Ll:t ulOag 94ea uOTSI9ATp 9q-4 eqleaqsnTTT you PTP Jag Aq'P8PTAOid ST -e-404 euinTOA 9144 4944 UOTSSTUIUIOD 914:t go ensueouoo w44 sem 4, *A4TJOTId 9XV4 pTnom 4U9wjjvd9a sXaol4 OTTqnd 844 UT aPTT* OATIV.14sTUTUIVV sle UOT4Tsod aaq OsTIP pTnoi4s DUTTnp9qDS UT IOTT;UOO Auv ;T 4vq4 buTPUV49aapun Sq4 q4TM IseqnUTUI 9)fpl VSTIJ b UTAVQ 9nUT4uOO 04 P9PT09P uOTSSTWWOO BLIJ 33P4S SXZ014 OTTqnd aO AIV49a09s P9409TO 9q4 'bUT49OUl 9q4 ;0 se4nUTW Oqq nOSTP ;9Tjq v spm JO; OTqTsuodsea eq PTnom oqm o4 sv UOTSS -91eqj . AaR46109S SV T294na ObloaD go UOT409TE (E ATV40 SOTA SP 4TTOa 9A94S 30 UOT409TH (Z *AVP bUT499W 49B Oq4 SR qlUOW A19A9 go Aupsanqj (PIE) PITq4 Sq4 30 4U9wqsTTqP4sa (I :q4Tm dnoab P94UTodde ATmau eq4 go bUTan4onaqs Tvu'JO; P949Tdtuoo UOTssTwulwOO 944 'bUT499W ET ATUf 9144 30 TVAOaddP bUTMOT10a 'Kd OE:L '4le 931PT4s9t4 uax Aq a9pao 0:1 P9TTeo sum buT*49*qw 8LIJ, '? OUIPPU84-4P UT OSTV Sasm VTP9M TVOOT eLp go aeqwew v puP'-4u9PTs9a 0440 Uou *IN IBTPUV U9TD PUP uosqaaqoH UeTle :4uesqV '1196UV ESTI PUP sx9914 4aeqaeH 'Tae4na abioaD laeqnqqovg XOTG 'X Tqnx aor '429;BOH Tnvd '4TTOd SA94S 'aOTXUTM A2ejq liaeqaeH qqaqeZTTS '94P T4s9M u9X :4uesajd S94nUTH bUT48OR 686T 101 4gribnv NOISSIKWOO DNIMMa Mr.: Weeks elaborated on the Village's leaf program including information on costs. This year the Village will pay $16,000 to dispose of leaves at the organic farm, however, this figure is still $12,000 less than the tipping fee of $28,000 at a compost site. The next item addressed by the Commission was the draft of a letter to new residents informing them of the recycling program. After suggested revisions are made, Public Works staff will mail the letter to new residents whose names and addresses are provided by water billing personnel. Herb pointed out that new residents receiving Citizens Utilities water would not be listed. He therefore offered to contact Mr. Fricke, Citizens Utilities requesting his assistance in identifying new water customers. Steve mentioned his concern of public agencies in'the Village not providing means for employees or residents to recycle, specifically the Mount Prospect Park Districts. It was suggested administrative officials be contacted to discuss the feasibility of at least having recycling bins on site. Steve offered to follow-up by cintztcting representatives at the Mount Prospect Park District and River Trails. Lengthy discussion citing the pros and cons of recycling interests resulted in prioritization of the Commission's objectives as listed below. 1) Yard waste 2) Procurement 3) Plastics Although all of the concerns and suggestions as to which direction the Village should go had merit, the Commission agreed to focus on those three items. Yard waste With a July 1990 ban on yard waste in the landfills the Commission concurs the Village must not only address but establish a policy on the disposal of yard waste as soon as possible; the Village may need to consider mandatory compliance. Herb suggested contacting NWMC to check status of bill mandating ban on yard waste; Ken stated he would also check with state agency in Springfield. Procurement In addition to the Village increasing its' purchase and use of recycled products the Commission feels private industry must also be "strongly" encouraged into increasing its' use of recycled materials; the first industry to be approached will be the newspaper industry; ie, Paddock Publication. Letter writing will be attempted on two levels; locally by Commission members (Ken will write rough draft) and then as a unified force with other municipalities. Mary is to contact a representative from Arlington Heights to elicit interest. Keo suggestedworking with the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County as they would be the appropriate group to iitiate the type of unification needed. it was mentioned procurement should be developed simultaneously with the other objaotineo, Plastics There seemed to more debate on the loeoa of plastics than with the other objectives. This may be due in part by 1) conflicting documentation on plastics and the environment 2) costs of collection and processing 3) availability of local processing centers. Mary stated Arlington Heights collect plastic milk jooa/ Marr will contact Arlington Heights for additional information. Additional topics of discussion to be updated at the September meeting were, 1> Availability of Village funds for Commission to attteod educational seminars. Herb stated Public Works did not have any money budgeted for the Commission and suggested they, contact the v'lIagr Mauamaz/ Ken will contact Mr. Dixon. 2) video for schools and library Steve and Lisa have both talked to Karen Giot and production of the video will begin soon; video should be available in October or November. 3) Stove suggested a network be developed among members to share information sources as well as material. Lisa informed the Commission the Village had located three local businesses willing to accept residential waste oil/ Jiffy Lube, Oil Pro and Main Street Standard. As there was no additional business the meeting was adjourned at 9:35 BM. Respectfully submitted, FINANCE COMMISSION Thursday, September 21, 1989 Finance Conference Room Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street I Call to Order II Acceptance of Minutes of August 31, 1989 III Elevated Tank Replacement Update Chairman 8*chxvber will provide on update of the action taken by the Village Board. IV 1988/89 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report Attached to this agenda is a copy of the Finance Director's Transmittal Letter that appears in the 1988/8e Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. The Transmittal Letter contains a summary of financial information contained in the report and will be the focal point of our discussion. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports will be delivered to Finance Commission members on Tuesday. V Finance Director Report VI Other Business VII Adjournment Enc Mayor Gerald L. Farley Members of the 8uuru of Trustees vulogo Manager John Fulton Dixon Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report or the Village of Mount Prospect, Dlinoia, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1989 is submitted herewi~h. This report represents a comprehensive and detailed picture of the Village's financial activities during the 1988/1989 fiscal year and the financial condition or the various funds at Avcu )O, 1989, Responsibility for the accuracy of the data presented as well as the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the villagc, we believe the data, as preoc"teu, is accurate in all material respects; that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position of the Village and the reeulta z.- t.., operations as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the Village's financial affairs have been included. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is presented in three sections: introuuctory, financial, and statistical. The introductory section includes this transmittal letter, the government's organizational chart and a list of principal officials. The financial section includes the general purpose financial statements and the combining, individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules, as well as the independent auditor's report on the financial statements and schedules. The statistical section includes selected financial and demographic information, generally presented on a multiyear basis. The Reporting Entity and its Services The Village of Mount Prospect was incorporated in 1917 and operates under the Board/Manager form or government. It in a home rule community as defined by the Illinois Constitution. Mount Prospect is located approximately twenty miles northwest of the city of Chicago in Cook County with a land area of 9^96 square miles and a population as of the 1980 census of 52,634. For financial reporting purvooes, this report includes all of the funds and account groups of the Village. It also includes all activities considered to be part of (controlled by or dependent un) the Village, as determined by the application of the criteria wet forth in "Defining the Governmental Reporting MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY TRUSTEES �� nwo��^w m��.��|nc Village of Mount Prospect �� VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 CAROL ^.FIELDS September /1, /989 Phone 31e/o92-S000 Mayor Gerald L. Farley Members of the 8uuru of Trustees vulogo Manager John Fulton Dixon Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report or the Village of Mount Prospect, Dlinoia, for the fiscal year ended April 30, 1989 is submitted herewi~h. This report represents a comprehensive and detailed picture of the Village's financial activities during the 1988/1989 fiscal year and the financial condition or the various funds at Avcu )O, 1989, Responsibility for the accuracy of the data presented as well as the completeness and fairness of the presentation, including all disclosures, rests with the villagc, we believe the data, as preoc"teu, is accurate in all material respects; that it is presented in a manner designed to fairly set forth the financial position of the Village and the reeulta z.- t.., operations as measured by the financial activity of its various funds; and that all disclosures necessary to enable the reader to gain the maximum understanding of the Village's financial affairs have been included. The Comprehensive Annual Financial Report is presented in three sections: introuuctory, financial, and statistical. The introductory section includes this transmittal letter, the government's organizational chart and a list of principal officials. The financial section includes the general purpose financial statements and the combining, individual fund and account group financial statements and schedules, as well as the independent auditor's report on the financial statements and schedules. The statistical section includes selected financial and demographic information, generally presented on a multiyear basis. The Reporting Entity and its Services The Village of Mount Prospect was incorporated in 1917 and operates under the Board/Manager form or government. It in a home rule community as defined by the Illinois Constitution. Mount Prospect is located approximately twenty miles northwest of the city of Chicago in Cook County with a land area of 9^96 square miles and a population as of the 1980 census of 52,634. For financial reporting purvooes, this report includes all of the funds and account groups of the Village. It also includes all activities considered to be part of (controlled by or dependent un) the Village, as determined by the application of the criteria wet forth in "Defining the Governmental Reporting Entity - GASB Codification Section 2100." (The criteria deal with existence as an organized entity, governmental character, and substantial autonomy.) Based on these criteria, the various funds and account groups shown in the ^ Table F Contents make up the reporting entity. Included in the reporting entity are the Police Penoion Employees Retirement System, the Firemwn^a Pension Employees Retirement System, and the Mount Prospect Public Library. School District District #57, District #59, High 5chqn1 District #214 Community College v��^ District #512, Mount Prospect Park District and River Trails Park District excluded from the reporting entity. 'The aforementioned entities it�w are qpverned taxing bodies and are not dependent on or controlled byt''� Village Mount Prospect. �/�wg� o, 'The village provide* the full range of municipal services contemplated by statute or charter. These services include public safety' highways and strouta health and social services, refuse disposal, public improvements, planning and ' zoning, we.tmr and sewer utility eervicc, and general administrative services. Special mention should be made of the achievement of "accreditation" by the Mount Prospect Police Department during the last fiscal year.On April 2 1989 the Mount Prospect Police Department became the 97th len enforcement agency i'' ' the country to receive this prestigious award. The award culminates four years � of efforts to establish, implement, and document Professional wta^"acou for Mount Prospect police operations. Achieving accreditation is an indication the determination and commitment of the entire ueportme"t to reach and maintain �r the highest possible standards for le* enforcement agencies. maintain acnuntinu System and Budgetary Control The accounts or the Village are organized on the basis of funds and account groups, each of which is considered a separate accounting entity~The operations of each rvnu are accounted ns with a separate set of self -balancing accounts that comprise its assets, liabilities, fund equity, rm,cnu=~ ~~ and expenditures or expenses, as appropriate. Resources are allocated to and accounted for in individual funds based upon the purposes for =xip» theyare to be spent and the means by which spending activities aro controlled. The Village's accounting records for general governmental operations are maintained on a modified accrual basis, with revenues being recorded when o,oileulr and measurable and expenditures being recorded when the services or goods are received and the liabilities are incurred. Accounting records for the Village's enterprise Funds, internal service fund and pension trust funds are maintained on the accrual busis, Fixed apeet!F use* in governmental fund type operations are accounted for in the General /`^od Assets Account Group rather than in the governmental funds themselves. Long term liabilities expected to be financed from governmental funds are accounted for in the General Long -Term Debt Account Group, not in the governmental funds. The two account groups are not rvnuo, they are concerned only with the measurement of financial puaition They are not involved with measurement or results or operation. ^ The Village or Mount Prospect has adopted sections 8-2-9.1, through and including sections 8-2-9.10 or Chapter 24 of the Illinois R'v�^oeu Statutes providing for on annual municipal budget in lieu of the pwe—~,^ ^~ of an annual appropriation ordinance. Budgetary control is maintained by the use or encumbrance accounting under ~xiox purchase ocuece. contracts and other commit- ments for the expenditure or monies are recorded in order reserve that - portion of the applicable apprnpriation. Encumbrances outstanding at year end, if any, are reported on reservations of fund balance since they do not constitute expenditures or liabilities. As oiuouaoeu in mote 13 to the financial statements (pages 27-28), the financial statements for the year ended April 30, 1989 reflect an accounting change whereby the Village has changed its method or accounting for special service area uoot as well as general obligation uout which is retired from enterprise fund revenues. Previaumly, these bonds had been accounted for as general obligation debt. The accounting change includes recording debt issued for enterprise fund purposes in the enterprise funds and special service area debt which is not a commitment of the Village in an agency fund. The specific changes in the April 30, 7989 financial statements include report- ing $1,575,000 or General Obligation Bonds Series 1987B and $975,000 of Special Service Area #5 Bonds in the wmtervocxa and Sewerage rvnu and the assets and liabilities of Special Service Areas #1, 29 ), 4 and 6 in an agency fund (Special Snc"lon Areas Fund), Beginning fund balances/retained earnings in the urut 5ervice. Capital Projects, and Enterprise Funds have been restated to reflect these changes. General Governmental Functions Revenues and other financing sources for general governmental functions (the General, Special Revenue and o=uL Service Funds) totalled $20,002.625 for the fiscal year ended April JO, 1989, on increase of $1,658,508, or 9.0% from the previous fiscal year. The amounts rocai"ou from various sources and the amount and percentage of increases and decreases in relation to last year aro shown u*low: Increase percent Percent /Decrvaae> of Increase Amount �� T �_Total from 1988 <Decreaav> Revenues Property Taxes $ 6,946,21} 34.7% $ 363,072 5,5% Sales rax 5,278,385 26.4 665,165 74.4 Other Taxes 805,8554.0 293,314 57,2 Total Taxes $1�3030,455 —65.1% 11.3% Licenses and permits 2,0*6,049 10.2 247,255 13^7 Intergovernmental },137,1)7 15.7 104,718 3,4 Charges for Services 240,358 1.2 95,358 65.8 Fines and Forfeits 280,999 1.4 < 80,667> <22.7> Interest 442,410 2.2 116,910 35.9 Miscellaneous Total Revenues 394,981 2,O< ��r�%',697,072 ( 21.4> 9.510 Other Sources Operating Transfers In $ 430,262 2,2% $ 136,438 46,400' Bond/Note rrucoeuo Total Other Svurcco-2.2%< - - < 175,000>(I) {100,0 > Total Revenues --------' ----' ------- 8.2% and Other Sources $20a00=2,625 lO_qO% 11,658,508 9.0% (1) Excludes refunding bonds of $1,570,000 in 1988. .i ^ From the preceding ____ry' it can be seen that total revenues and other sourcesincrmaaed $1,658,508, or 9.0%, from the previous years. Total revenues were vp*/,897,A72 along with a decrease from other sources of $38,564, The mostaiu«ifi^ant increase was in sales tax revenue which jumped $665,1e5`a rmuuat14.4m, The increase can be attciuutau to the addition of three new anchoretor=a at Ranu^urot Shopping Center as well as from a general high level of confidence in the local 000nomy, Property tax revenues at $6,946,213 are still the minglagreatest source of revenue for general governmental unctiona, up '.'�the ne prevzoua year. Other revenue increases of special nate are the increase of $293,314 in other taxes and $247'255 in licenses and permits. The total of other taxes reflects the first full twelve-month period of receipts for a l% Food and Beverage Tax and a $7.00 per $1,000 Real Estate Transfer Tax which became effective November 1, 1987. The incc0000 in licenses and permits is primarily from building permit related fees generated as a result of the highest level or building activity in the history of the Village. A total of 21126 permits were issued during 1988/8* with e construction valve of $67,5Oe,096` The previous high mark for building activity was in 1987/88 with 2,O61 permits with a value of $38,247,949- Expenditures and other financing uses for general governmental functions (the General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds) totaled $19,204,902, an increase of $1,701,450, or 9.7% over last year. Expenditures and other uses for major functions or the ro�lv°a; Village in comparison to last year are recorded as Increase Peccant Percent {Decrease/ of Increase —Amount� of Total l from 1988 <Decceaoe>Expenditures _ — General Government $ 1,678,188 8.7m $ < 21,509/ / 1.3"> Public Safety 7,940'610 41.4 612,847 8.4 Highways and Streets 3,796,675 1.9.8 504,174 15.3 Health 1,478,389 7.7 82,173 5^9 Welfare 754,327 3.9 170,971 29.3 Culture and Recreation 1,823,827 9.5 140°408 8,3 Miscellaneous 511,793 2.7 76,557 17.6 Debt Service 1,177,368 6.1� 162,02*(1) 75.6 Total Expenditures $7p,161,177 99,8% $1,727,587 p,y� Other Uses �� 725 0.2_ < 261137> <37.4> Total Expenditures and Other uoea 119$2042902 10O.M 9.7'0 (1) Excludes refunding bonds or $1,570,000 in 1988. A considerable portion of the expenditure increases for Public 5afety, Highways and Streets and Culture and Recreation can be attributed to higher^ personnel u"`h=' costs. Some $755,000 of $1,701,450, is due to the total increase in expenditures a''"uuca or higher anlaci"a and benefits. Other items of ~o expenditure of $225,008 under Highways and Streets for the purchase or`~�`=='' property, vii on increase in refuse disposal costs or $82,113 reported in the Health function and an increase of $170,971 for welfare related Community Development Block Grant Projects. The increase of $162,026 in Debt Service costs is due to additional requirenents of the general corporate portion of the 19878 General Obligation Bonds. Fund balances of the General, Special Revenue and Debt Service Funds totaled $5,548,484 as of April 30, 1989. The balance of the General Fund stands at $3"230,152 with the Special, Revenue and Debt Service funds at $1.521,017 and $796,515 respectively. The increase in the balance or the General Fund totaled $668^518 which reflects higher than expected revenues for the period. Total fund balances represent approximately 29% or total expenditures and omoc financing uses for the fiscal year ended April JO, 19R9. Property Tax Infomation In luinoio, property taxes attach as an enforceable lien on January 1 of the tax year, but are not billed and collected until the ma^t calendar year. Tax uula for the village of Mount Prospect are prepared by Cook County and issued on or about February 7 and August n and are payable on or about March 1 and September 1, The County collects such taxes and remits them periodically to the Village. Property taxes provide the largest single source for financing Village services. The 7988 tax levy amounted to $9,142,834 and the 1987 and 1986 levies were $7,325.738 and $6,710,470, respectively. Property tax collections for the 1987 levy were at the 98.9% level which is generally consistent with collection ratios since 1979. As a home rul ccnunity, the Village uooa not have a tax rate limit. Accordingly, the actual tax rate is veoeodent upon the amount of taxes levied and property valuations. Illinois statutes require property to be anaoeaed at 33m of fair market value and to ensure equity in assessment practices, the Illinois Department of Revenue can add e multiplier to achieve the 33"0' level. In *bunt Prospect, equalized maaesanu valuation (E«v) within the village for 1988 totaled $590,778,708, an increase of 4.3% over the /987 total of $566`427,664, Allocation of the property tax levy for 1988 and the two preceeding years is as follows (rates per $100 equalized assessed valuation): purpome198n L ��8/_Lev1 19 .� 1/86 Levy General Fund $ .7753 $ .7555 $ .7093 Special Revenue Funds -3771 .3409 ,3299 Debt Service Funds ,1482 .1077 .1179 Capital Projects Funds ,0*97 .8727 .0571 Trust and Agency Funds F u 0087 � U 1a2 .0238� Total Village Tax Roto Starting in 1985, the tax levy for public libraries has been listed as m separate tax rate on individual property tax bills. The above rates for Special Revenue Funds include the rates for the mount pcuapeot Public Library. The Library rate for 1988 was $,2990 and for 19e7 and 1e86 it was $.2700 and $.2690, respectively. viii ~- ~ ^ In addition to the general property tem levy for village and Library purpo�e� the Village has six special service areas which were created for financing ` improvements that were undertaken for the benefit of specific areasSpecial Service Areas 1, 21 31 4. & G are relatively small in size.Special Service Area No. 5 includes approximately 78% of the Village and is being used to - finance the fixed costs of a Joint venture established to supply Lake Michigan water to the Village. Following is a comparison of tax rate~ and tax levies ro the special service areas for 1988 and 1987: r 1987 Tax Rate Tax Lev $1.018 $ 23,977 1'098 7988 ,52s 4,419 Tax Rate Tax Levy SSA No. 1 $ 'e54 $ 23,163 GGA No. 2 1.237 31,657 55* No. 3 .301 2,835 SS* No. 4 .138 1,680 SSA No. 5 .}lz 1,557,640 SSA No. 6 1.01; 32,025 1987 Tax Rate Tax Lev $1.018 $ 23,977 1'098 27,549 ,52s 4,419 .81U 9,83e .299 1,447,001 Additional information regarding equalized oouenseu valuations, to, levies,tax rates and tax collections can be round in ma Statistical Section on pages Debt Administration Mount Prospect's uunueu debt has been raced Aa by wpody'u Investor Service, Inc. since 1973. That rating was confirmed for the Village's General ouliy=au Bonds, Series 1987 e~ C' and D which were sold in 1987 and Series 1988 wxi`''w"" sold an June 21, 1988, 8vngo which are rated xo are judged to be o' »i"" - quality by all standards and are generally known as high grade uvnde, y'' The ratio of net bonded debt to aaeoaoed valuation and the amount or net bonded debt per capita are useful indicators or a municipality's debt position.This information is helpful not only to Village authorities, but also to citizens and investors in village uonoa, This data for the Village as of April JO 89 is as follows: , '' Not general obligation debt $7'351,265 Ratio of debt to assessed value 1.24va Ratio of debt to actual value 0.41% Debt per capita $134.56 Net general obligation debt of $7.351,265 is mage up of total general obligation debt at April 70, /989 of $8,147,780 l000 available fund balances o as of the same date. ' °''"'^'' Debt to be retired from enterprise fund revenues consists of $2,015' oOU in bonds~xicn were issued as general obligation bonds and $975,000 in bonds issued asavecial service area bonds. The generalobligation bonds include $1~515,000 of 1987 Series e Bonds and $500,000 of Series 1988 8unga which were avid June 21, lnaa at an average effective interest rate of 6.087%. ix Bonds for Special Service Areas No., 1, 2, J, 4. & a which are not u commitment or the Village or the Village's enterprise funds total $660,812. These bonds are not recorded as an obligation or the village and are secured by the levy of an annual tax on the real property within the special service area. The village acts as an agent for the property owners in levying and collecting the tax and Forwarding the collections to the bondholders when principal and interest payments are u"n, Additional information regarding the Village's debt position may by found on pages 21 through 24 or Notes to the Financial Statements and in the Statistical Section, pages 142 tnrvvox 146, Long-term debt schedules are included on pages 125 through ln, Capital Projects Funds pruceeua.fcvm general obligation bond issues, the special tax for capital improvements and replacements, and certain other revenues are recorded and accounted for in Capital Projects Funds. When the improvement projects are completed and/or equipment is obtained, the expenditures are normally capi- talized nucing the fiscal year ended April 30, 1989 the Village expended $4,154,634 for public improvements, $37,233 for property acquisition, and $857,695 for new equipment and equipment replacement from Capital Projects Funds. Additionally, net tce"orvro of $386,537 were made to Debt Service Funds. Water and Sewer System Although the #etec°ocka and Sewerage Fund recorded a not lona of $05,072 for the riaool year that ended April 30, 1989, the financial condition of the Waterworks and sewerage pvno continues to remain strong. The net loss was primarily due to nunovorating lvnsoo from the JAwx Joint vont"rc, Net working capital amounted to $3,461,269 and cash and investments totaled $2,877.537 as of April 30, 1989. The combined water and sewer rate of $2.10 per 1,000 gallons which had been in effect since May l, 1984 increased to $2.30 per 1,000 gallons on May 1, 1988 and to $2.50 per l,OOU gallons on May 1, 1909. Water rates will be reviewed on an annual basis and increased as necessary to ensure eu=qvato operating revenues. Residential customers are billed on a ui-monthly cycle and commercial, muva- tcia} and institutional customers are billed on a monthly cycle. The village is one of seven members of the Northwest Suburban Municipal Joint Action Nater Agency (the "xyoncy"), whose ru.-pr`e is to supply Lake Michigan water to the member municipalities. Since January, 1986 the village has been receiving all of its water requirements for the Village system from the Agency. Please refer to pages 30 through /5 of the Notes to the Financial Statements, Note 16,A for further information. The Village water and sewer system provides services to approximately 7014' of the Village with the balance of the village serviced by Citizens Utilities Company. That portion of the Village serviced by the Village system has been incorporated into u Special Service Tax District (Special Service Area No. 5) to provide property tax revenue for certain costs associated with the Agency. It in the Village's intention to finance the Village's share or fixed costs or the Agency with property topma from the Special Service rax District and to finance all other water and sewer costs from water and sewer rates. 8iux Management The Village maintains a self-insurance program which is accounted for in the Risk Management Fund, an Internal Service Fund. Included in this program is the administration of claims for property losses, general and automobile iiability, workers' compensation and employees' and retirees' medical benefits.Addi- tionally, tionallyr an integral part OF the Village's self-insurance - emphasis on loss prevention. Departmental safety committees program is an reports and actively promote safety practices. ^~~^~- accident Financing for the Risk Management Fund in provided by contributions from employees and retirees for medical benefits, service charges from the General Fund, Library Fund, Waterworks and 3eworagw Fund, and Parking System Revenue Fund, and from investment income. For the fiscal year ended April 30 1989 net income totaled $78,573. All known claims and a provision for p\m�^mm incurred u"� but not reported are recorded as liabilities of the Risk Management pte1 fund equity as or April JO. 198* was $1,315,211. Fund. ' On April l, 1987, the village joined the High -Level Excess Liability Pool (xELp), e consortium or fifteen municipalities formed to provide excess liability insurance. *[Lp currently provides $5.000,004 liability coverage in excess or a $1.000,000 self-insured retention. Swroirlc information regarding the HELP joint -venture can be found in mote 16.8, pages 35-38 in the Notes to the Financial Statements. Employee Pensions Police sworn personnel are covered by the Police Pension Employees Retirement syonwm and fire sworn personnel are covered by the Firemen's Pension Employees Retirement System. Both of these plans are single -employer plans administered by local boards of trustees. The defined benefits and employer and employee contribution levels aro governed by Illinois State 5tatutcs police plan participants are required to contribute 9% of their base salary ` and fire plan members contribute 8.25m of their base nmlariem. The Village is ! required to -- contribute the remaining amounts necessary to finance the plan determined by on enrolled actuary. By the year 2020, each plan must he fully funded. Actuarial services are provided by the State of Illinois Department of Inevramom, however, a municipality also has the option of engaging an indepen- dent actuary. For the year ended April 30, /988, the village contracted with - Miller, Mason & Dickenson, Inc. to perform these actuarial valuatione Following is u summary of information for the two funds: ^ Pension Benefit Obligation �— -- Firemen's April 30, 1988 $11,695,+47 $12,278,716 Net Assets Available April 30, 1988 (Market value) $12~113,349 $13,953,869 Percent Funded at April 30' 1e88 103,6m 113,6m Employer Funding Requirement May 1, 1988 - April 70, 1989 $ 2,248 $ -0- Employer Funding Provided May 1. 1988 - April )O, 1989 $ 62,789 $ -O- met Income May 1, 1988 - April xO, 1989 $ 987,419 $ 1,159,988 xi The actuarial assumptions used by Miller, Mason & Dickenson, Inc. included investment return of 8'0' earnings progressions of 5,25% and UP -1984 Mortality /auloo' From the information provided it can be seen that full -funding has been achieved in each Fund. It is the Village's intention to continue to obtain an indepen- dent actuarial valuation for each fund and to maintain full -funding uewmd upon the actuarial requirements. All ot"er full-time employees aro covered by the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund (ImRF), a state-wide pension plan, and Social Security. InRr acts as a common investment and administrative agent for lncel governments and school districts in Illinois. Benefit provisions and funding requirements are esta- blished by Illinois State Statute. Participating members are required to contribute 4.5 percent of their annual salary and the Village is r*qvicou to contribute the remaining amounts necessary to fund the coverage of its employees in the system. The Village's contribution rate for 19e8 was 6.8%, nue to benefit changes, that rote was increased to 8-8'0 in /989 and it is expected that the rate will be 10.3% in 1990. Please see pages 43-51 and 119-124 for more information in employee pensions. General Fixed Assets The General Fixed xoneta of the Village are those fixed assets used in the performance of general governmental functions and exclude the fixed assets of Enterprise and Internal Service Funds. As of April ]Q, 19899 the general fixed assets or the village amounted to $17,867,870 (excluding the coot of zpauo, bridges, curbs .'d gvl.era, streets and sidewalks, drainage systems, traffic signals and lighting systems). This amount represents the historical coat of the assets and is considerably less than their present value. Depreciation of general fixed assets is not recognized in the Village's accounting system. Cash Management and Investments The Village's policy regarding cash management is baaec upon the realization that there is a time -value to money. A high priority has been placed on procedures to ensure that all monies dwe the Village are collected and deposited as promptly as possible. Disbursements are closely controlled and wire transfers are used for receipts and disbursements whenever anprvnriate, Of equal importance Is the emphasis on investment portfolio management. An investment of temporarily idle funds may be made for a period of one day to an excess of one year depending on when the money is needen. The Village pools the cash of various funds, except in certain restricted and special accounts, to maximize interest earnings. As n result, almost every fund has a certain amount of investment income regardless of the fund's size. The Village's guidelines for cash management and investment procedures were formalized in an investment policy that was adopted by the Village Board on July 2, 19e5- The policy identifies the responsibility for the investment program, criteria for depositories including cu11etvcaiizot ion, allowable investments and reporting requirements. It is the Village's determination to maintain a high priority for cash management and investment procedures. xii Included in the investment portfolio or the village aro the investments of the Police Pension Fund and the Firemen's Pension Fund. These funds have been established to provide pension payments to retired and/or disabled police officers and firefighters and their dependents. During the fiscal year, $1,112^880 was earned as interest income in the Police Pension Fund and " $7,292,457 in the Firemen's Pension Fund. Total interest income earned in all funds during the riaoa1 year that ended April )o, 1989 was $3,5/7,437 compared to $3,327,441 for the previous fiscal year for an increase of $189,992. A comparison of interest income earned during the past two years is presented below: The above totals reflect an average yield of 8-08% on short-term investments in the year ended April 30, 1989 compared to an average yield or 6.50% the previous year. Long-term investments in the Trust and Agency Funds earned 8.7/'0 in the current year compared to 8.60% the previous year. One of the objectives or the Village's investment policy is to minimize credit and mucuot risks while maintaining e competitive yield on its pnrtfolio Accordingly, deposits are either insured by federal depository insurance or ^ collateralized. Collateral on deposits is held by the Village, it's agent or ~ financial institution's trust department in the Village's name. At year-end the carrying amount of the Village's deposits totaled $3.513,104 and the bank balances totaled $3°632,816, That total amount was insured or collateralized b collateral held by the Village's agent in the village's name, y As or April JO, 1989, the Village had a total or $41,247,773 in interest bearing investments. Or that total, 63m are classified in the category or lowest credit ziuu as defined by the Governmental Accounting Standards 8uuru. The balance or the investments includes 30% held in the Illinois Public Treasurer's Investment pvo1 in which the State or Illinois holds collateral valued at 1101, l% held in the Village's name by a counter -party financial institution's trust gepartment and 5% held by the trustee of the Village's Deferred Compensation Plan. The only investments which are either uninsured or oncollatnrmlized are $200 ,000 i/ Guaranteed Investment Contracts of insurance companies authorized to uv u'`einoa� ^ in Illinois. xui Interest income Fiscal Year Ending April 30 1989 General Fund 274.941 $ 182,787 Special Revenue Funds 131,023 75,011 nout Service Funds 56,051 89.900 Capital Projects ru^oa 2/8,592 385,128 Enterprise Funds 330,458 314,980 Internal Service Fund 100,796 e9.979 Pension Trust Funds 2.405,337 2,229,*74 Expendable Trust Funds _ 238 __ 185 The above totals reflect an average yield of 8-08% on short-term investments in the year ended April 30, 1989 compared to an average yield or 6.50% the previous year. Long-term investments in the Trust and Agency Funds earned 8.7/'0 in the current year compared to 8.60% the previous year. One of the objectives or the Village's investment policy is to minimize credit and mucuot risks while maintaining e competitive yield on its pnrtfolio Accordingly, deposits are either insured by federal depository insurance or ^ collateralized. Collateral on deposits is held by the Village, it's agent or ~ financial institution's trust department in the Village's name. At year-end the carrying amount of the Village's deposits totaled $3.513,104 and the bank balances totaled $3°632,816, That total amount was insured or collateralized b collateral held by the Village's agent in the village's name, y As or April JO, 1989, the Village had a total or $41,247,773 in interest bearing investments. Or that total, 63m are classified in the category or lowest credit ziuu as defined by the Governmental Accounting Standards 8uuru. The balance or the investments includes 30% held in the Illinois Public Treasurer's Investment pvo1 in which the State or Illinois holds collateral valued at 1101, l% held in the Village's name by a counter -party financial institution's trust gepartment and 5% held by the trustee of the Village's Deferred Compensation Plan. The only investments which are either uninsured or oncollatnrmlized are $200 ,000 i/ Guaranteed Investment Contracts of insurance companies authorized to uv u'`einoa� ^ in Illinois. xui Economic Development and Local Initiatives The Village or Mount Prospect is located on the eastern edge of the "Golden Corridor" which extends along Interstate 90 from O'Hare Airport to Elgin. Over the past twenty years, this particular area has been one of the fastest growing areas in the entice Midwest. Economic development is expected to continue at a strong pace as evidenced by the recent announcement of Sears to relocate their merchandising group from Chicago to this area. The Sears' Project, consisting of development of 008 acres approximately 15 miles vest of Mount Prospect, is expected to be the focal point of continued expansion for many years to come. The village actively encourages economic development activity and has ax- parienceu unparalleled building activity during the past year. The number or building permits and construction values has been escalating over the past five years, reaching m peak of 2,126 permits in 1988/8e with a construction value or $67,509`096. Following is u description of some or the major development projects in progress: Downtown Redevelopment District No. 1 - A Tax Increment Redev---,--~ Plan has been adopted for Downtown Redevelopment District No. l. Implemen- tation of t^e redevelopment project continues. In Target Area �`'`| tnvnhqvma are to be built with thirty-five units under conatcuot�"a''d initial occupancies occurring in July of 1989. ^~ ' The Redevelopment District was amended in December of 7988 to expand the boundaries to one block west of main, to Wille Street. This move offers greater potential for commercial redevelopment in the downtown area. Property acquisition and development discussions for this area are underway. Randhucot Shopping Center Renovation - After two years of major expansion that resulted in three now anchor aturca of 147,O0U square fret, Randhucmt Shopping Center continues its renovation. .o major interior remodeling is underway that relocates professional offices From a second floor mezzanine to the lower level. Approximately 25,800 square feet or specialty retail will replace the offices on the nezzamine level. These new stores are scheduled to be opened in November of 1989, Mount Prospect Plaza Renovation - Phase I of this community shopping center redevelopment is complete. The owners of the property, Western Development Corporation, are now marketing Phase D, Kensington renter for 8vsinnmo - Opus, Inc. is nearing completion of a nuu acre site with quality office and industrial uuiluingo. During the past three years, nine buildings have been constructed bringing the total to 48 buildings in the Kensington Center. Metropolitan Life is the newest corporate tenant in the park occupying nearly all of a 98,000 square foot building. Only six lots remain vacant and available for development. viv ~ _~ Country Club Village at Old Orchard - Lexington Development is constructing 344 residential housing units on 38 acres as a planned unit development. Construction is substantially complete in Phase z with initial occupancies occurring in the Spring or 1989, ` Lake Center Plaza - The Alter orpov has completed all public improvements for this za acre project that ultimately will provide 1,000 000 square feet or high-tech light industrial and office development.8u^'�u�no construc- tion is expected to get underway in 1990. - Plaza united - crovmo breaking for a retail/restaurant/motel plaza took place /n August 1988. The first phase which includes 2B4O00 square feet of retail "pace is expected to be completed by the end of /,op. ' Other Developments - Thirty-one thousand square Feet of retail space has been completed as part of the Brentwood Planned unit Development.Numerous other developments including rnuc smaller single family subdivisions are under construction and should be completed in 1990. In addition to the economic development projects above, the Village has demon- strated a commitment to the infrastructure and public facility needs of th Village. During 1988, the Village's Public Works Department moved into a � 78°000 square foot facility to house its Streets, Water and Se°er, into Maintenance, Forestry and Parking Divisions.A study i ° ' c�� uqy conducted to determine the facility needs of the Police and F� currently being Fire Departments. A sewer rehabilitation project which will bring the village into compliance with requirements or the Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago is nearing completion. Other water and sewer system improvements are proceeding as scheduled. Street resurfacing and road reconstruction also have received w high priority from Village officials. Approximately $800 ,000 was expended for resurfacing and reconstruction in 1988/89 and $1^645,080 is allocated for street projects in the 1989/90 Village budget. One of the other major initiatives that the Village has undertaken is in the area of refuse disposal. In February 1989, a pilot recycling program encpm paewing 1,800 homes was originated. The teat program was mo successful that it - expanded to e Village -wide program in May 1989. Also in the area of refuse disposal, the Village is o member of the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County. The purpose of the Agency is to zi�n. c,ns^rmpt finance,operate a maintain a solid waste disposal system to serve 'its t°''member no munici pa1itiea. The Agency has acquired land for a "balcill"system ystmm and is - proceeding with engineering plana and securing the necessary permits.It is expected that construction of the facility in western Cook County will start i 1991. The Agency in being accounted for as a joint venturePlease �='e Note 18.C, Pages 38-42 for further information. ^ � The level of current building activity within the Village of mount Prospect and adjacent communities, prospects for continued growth in future years,an unemployment rate of under 3%^ healthy growth in Village revenues,nd a commitment by Village officials to address emerging problems should enable the Village to maintain its economic stability in years to come, xv Independent Audit Illinois Statutes require an independent audit for all funds and accounts or the village- This requirement has been complied with and the independent auditor's report is included in the financial section or this roport^ In addition to meeting the requirements set forth in state statutes, the audit was designed to meet the requirements or the federal Single Audit Act of 1984 and related OMB Circular «-12e. The auditor's reports related specifically to the single audit are included in o separate report. Certificate of Achievement The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOx) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the Village of Mount pruavoct for its Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the fiscal year ended April 30/ 1988. This is the fifth consecutive year that the Village has received this a~aru. In order to be awarded a Certificate of Achievement, o governmental unit must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized comprehensive annual financial report, whose contents conform to program standards. Such reports must satisfy moth generally accepted accounting principl2o and applicable legal requirements. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for u period of one year only. Na believe our current report continues to conform to Certificate or Achievement pcoucom requirements, and we aro submitting it to GrO4 to determine its eligibility for another certificate. Acknowledgments The preparation or this report on a timely basis could not have been accom- plished without the efficient and dedicated services of the entire staff of the Finance Department. I would like to express my appreciation to Carol Widmer, Accounting Manager, and all members or the Finance Department who assisted and contributed to its preparation. Additionally, l would like to acknowledge the Mayor, the Board or Trustees and the Village Manager for their leadership and support in planning and conducting the financial operations of the Village in a responsible and progressive manner. Respectfully sutmitted, David C. Jepson, CPA Director or Finance xvi TO: Mayor Gerald L. "Skip" Farley and Board of Tcuat000 FROM: Trustee Ralph M. Arthur DATE: September 15, 1989 SUBJECT: Solid Waste Agency Debt Obligation The Solid Waste Agency sold an initial bond issue of $5.5 oullum in May 1988 with a maturity date of May 1, 1991. The interest on the bonds was provided for through the bond proceeds and the principal was to be refinanced through n permanent bond issue in 1989. One of the security provisions of the $5.5 million issue was a guarantee by the member municipalities to pay their proportionate share if the permanent bond issue was not sold by March 15, 1990. At the Executive Committee meeting of the Agency on September 13, 1989, the Agency attorney informed the members that it did not appear that the permanent bonds � would be sold by March 15, 1990. He cited the delays in obtaining the EPA permits and the questions to be caonlvod regarding the transfer rateo, If the bonds are not sold, each municipality will be required to pa/ their share in 12 monthly installments starting May 1, 1990. The Village of Mount Prospect's share is � $369,344 or $30,779 per installment. & copy of the amount of each municipalities share is attached. - _ It should be mentioned that the above amount is only for the $5,5 million uunu ^ iaom, that matures on May 1, 1991. When the EPA permits are obtained, the Agency ' in planning on selling an additional $2 million in bonds. The repayment con- ditions for these bonds will be determined when the bonds are sold. It is not certain that the permanent financing will not be completed by March 15, 1990, but it dwom not appear like it will be dune. l will keep you informed of any changes that occur. c: village Manager Enc SCHEDULE A Contract Liabilities 01 Members under Agreements Contract Nature of Contract liability Member Member _. Pledge Population (1) Share Arlington Heights Gen Oblig, 66,116 8.44% Barrington Revenue 9,029 1.15 Buffalo Grove Gen Oblig. 26,168 3.34 Des Plaines Gen Oblig. 55,374 7.06 Elk Grove Village Gen Oblig. 28,679 3.66 Evanston Gen Oblig. 73,706 9.40 Glencoe Revenue 9,200 1.17 Glenview Gen Oblig. 33,131 4.23 Hanover Park Gen Oblig. 28,848 3.68 Hoffman Estates Gen Oblig. 40,867 5.21 Inverness Revenue 4,046 0.52 Kenilworth Revenue 2,708 0.35 Lincolnwood Revenue 11,921 1.52 Morton Grove Gen Oblig. 23,747 3.03 Mount Prospect Gen Oblig. 52,634 6.72 Niles Gen Oblig. 30,363 3.87 Northbrook Gen Oblig. 33,206 4.24 Northfield Revenue 4,887 0.62 Palatine Gen Oblig. 34,262 4.37 Park Ridge Gen Oblig. 38,704 4.94 Prospect Heights Revenue 13,262 1.69 Rolling Meadows Gen Oblig. 20,167 2.57 Roselle Revenue 17,048 2.18 Skokie Gen Oblig. 60,278 7.69 South Barrington Revenue 1,168 0.15 wheeling Gen Oblig. 23,266 2.97 Wilmette Gen Oblig, 28,229 3.60 Winnetka Revenue 12.772 1.63 TOTAL 783,786 100.00% Contract Contract liability Liability Plus at Maturity Maximum Step-up at mf 1988 Notes Maximum Step -Up Maturity of 1988 Notes $ 463,951 $ 153,103 f 617,054 63,358 20,909 84,267 183,627 60,596 244,223 388,572 128,228 516,800 201,247 66,411 267,658 517,211 170.680 687,891 64,558 21,305 85,863 232,488 76,720 309,208 202,433 66.803 269,236 286,773 94,635 381,408 28,392 9,369 37,761 19,003 6.271 25,274 83,652 27,606 111,258 166,638 54,990 221,628 369,344 121,884 491,228 213,064 10,311 283,375 233,014 76,894 309,908 34,293 11,317 45,610 240,424 79,340 319,764 271,595 89,626 361,221 93,062 30,711 123,773 141,516 46,701 188,217 119,630 39,477 159,107 422,984 139,585 562,569 8,196 2,705 10,901 163,263 53,876 217,139 198,089 65,370 263,459 89,624 29,576 199,200 $5,500,000 (i): As stipulated by the Agency Agreement, population is from the 1980 U.S. Census or any subsequent federal special census published by the U.S. Bureau of the Census. See Appendix A for a complete listing of 1980 and special census population figures. -1.0-