HomeMy WebLinkAbout4114_001:
Next Ordinance No. 4085
Next Resolution No. 39-89 k
A G E N D A
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R �/ F B U S I N E S S
REG{1LAR MEETING
MMV
Meeting Location: Meeting Datr—
Meeting Room, let Floor Tuesday §,SP4- 5, /9?9
Senior Citizen Center September 5, 1989
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald 948kiple Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Corcoran
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, August 15, 1989
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYORS REPORT
A. PROCLAMATIONS:
1. Joshua Mayo
2. Citizenship Day, September 17 and Constitution
Week, September 17 - 23, 1989
B. A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE NATIONAL POLICY
AGAINST THE ILLEGAL SALE AND USE OF DRUGS (Exhibit A)
C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amends the Class "G" liquor license
classification to permit the sale of any alcoholic
beverage by a public golf course. (Exhibit B)
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 39-V-89, 1813 Maya Lane
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1813 MAYA LANE
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a
10' front yard instead of the required 30' in
order to locate a parking pad. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
40-V-89, St. Paul Lutheran School,
100 South School Street
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
•• PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ST. PAUL
LUTHERAN SCHOOL, 100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET
This Ordinance grants the following variations
in order to reconstruct this elementary school:
a. To allow the existing parsonage as an
accessory building;
b. To allow a floor area ratio of .40 instead
of the maximum .35 permitted;
C. To allow a maximum lot coverage of 54% instead
of the maximum 45% permitted;
d. To allow a 301 building height instead of the
permitted 241;
e. To allow a 171 exterior side yard instead of
the 201 permitted;
f. To allow a zero foot exterior side yard instead
of the required 201 for a parking lot on the
east property line;
9. To allow a zero foot rear yard instead of the
required 251 for a parking lot; and
h. To allow a zero foot setback for a parking lot
instead of the required 101.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the
requested variations by a Vote of 6-0. (Exhibit D)
2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS
FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ST. PAUL LUTHERAN
SCHOOL, 100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET
This Ordinance grants modifications from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) for St. Paul's School:
a. Permit carriage walk within parkways;
b. Street lighting be fulfilled through
installation of standard Commonwealth
Edison equipment;
C. Permit parking lot to remain in its existing
condition, including omitting required yard; and
The Plan commission recommended granting these
modifications from the Development Code as requested
by a vote of 6-2. (Exhibit E)
3. St. Paul School Plat of Subdivision
ZBA 44 -SU -89 and ZBA 45-V-89, 410 S. Meier Road
1. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL
USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
410 S. MEIER ROAD
This Ordinance grants a Special Use to allow a
four -car garage and a variation to allow a 980
square foot garage, instead of the 600 square
feet permitted, and a variation to allow a
driveway 39 feet in width rather than the
permitted 21 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0. (Exhibit F)
2. lst reading Of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 410 S. MEIER ROAD
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a
driveway 39 feet wide rather than the maximum
21 foot wide garage. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a
vote of 6-0. (Exhibit G)
D. ZBA 48-V-89, 1808 Cree Lane
1st reading Of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1808 CREE LANE
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow
a 7 foot front yard and one foot side yard in order
to provide a parking pad. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a
vote of 4-2. (Exhibit H)
E. 1. ZBA 49-V-89, Amoco oil, Southwest corner of
Wolf & Euclid
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
VARIATION FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON
THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF ROAD AND
EUCLID AVENUE
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a
revised site plan for the food mart/gas
station, in conformance with the newly
implemented IDOT floodway requirements and
to permit the time period for the previously
approved variations to be extended for one
year. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit J)
2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS
FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) FOR
PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED ON THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF WOLF ROAD AND EUCLID AVENUE
This Ordinance grants modifications from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) to permit a dry
detention basin floor slope of not less than 1%;
building no closer than 50 feet to the detention
facility; and, building no closer than 1-1/2 feet
from finished floor and floodway limit. The Plan
Commission recommended granting the requested
modifications from the Development Code by a vote
of 8-0. (Exhibit K)
IX- NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 47-V-89, 1004 West Lincoln Street
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit a
.5 foot side yard setback for a patio, rather than
the required 8 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
The Petitioner also requested a variation for a
fence 51 611 in height, which the Zoning Board of
Appeals granted by a vote of 5-1. An appeal from
the decision of the Zoning Board of Appeals has
been filed with the administration which requires
the Village Board to make the final decision.
B. ZBA 51-V-89, 128 South Waverly Place
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a 31 6" side yard instead of the required
6.5 feet in order to expand the existing attached
garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
C. ZBA 53-V-89, 103 South Edward Street
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a zero foot front yard instead of the permitted
30 feet and 14-1/2 inch side yard in order to
provide for a parking pad. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests by a
vote of 6-0.
D. ZBA 55-V-89, 1707 Myrtle
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit
an existing patio enclosure to remain 5.75 feet
from the detached garage, rather than the required
10 foot separation and to permit a driveway width
of 27.75 feet instead of the permitted 21 feet.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by a vote of 5-1.
E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE
NO. 4083 AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF EQUIPMENT
OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance repeals Ordinance No. 4083 which
authorized the sale of specified property and
equipment at the Northwest Municipal Conference
auction on September 16th in Arlington Heights. (Exhibit L)
F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
DISPOSAL OF EQUIPMENT OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance authorizes the sale of specified
property and equipment through an auction to
be conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference
in Mount Prospect on October 14. (Exhibit M)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid results:
1. Parkway trees
2. Snow Plow
3. Reconstruction of Greenwood & Oneida Lane
B. Request for field change, 55 N. Albert Street,
to permit installation of a brick patio.
C. Proposal to retain consultant for repair of
retaining wall at the west commuter parking lot.
D. Proposal to retain consultant for parking study
E. Proposal to retain consultant for drainage problem
at Wa Pella and Central Road
F. Proposal to retain consultant for Public Safety
Facility space Utilization Study
G. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE
OF SEWER GROUTING EQUIPMENT OWNED BY THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance authorizes the sale of this
specialized equipment to a specified purchaser. (Exhibit N)
H. Request to waive bidding procedure for
Forest Avenue reconstruction, sewer repair.
I. Request to waive bidding procedure for sanitary
sewer and manhole rehabilitation on Briarwood
Drive East, Lincoln Street Easement and Thayer
J. Request to increase contract for sanitary sewer
rehabilitation program
K. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
August 15, 1989
CALL To ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:33 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Ted Wattenberg
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Arthur. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved APPROVE MINUTES
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the
Mayor and Board of Trustees held August 1, 1989.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois municipal Retirement Fund
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (198)
Downtown Redev., Const. Fund (1987)
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
$ 507,803
31,259
14,733
52,945
361,564
5,712
35,959
5,499
7,226
1,500
7,287
8,201
57,034
$E-,096,722
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
accept the financial report dated July 31, 1989, subject
to audit.
ORD. NO. 4p,
Trustee Corcoran,ondad by Trustee Fl;oros moved
or passage of Ordinance No 4080
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Watteriberg
Nays: ` None
Motion carried'.
Page 2 - August 15, 1989
Upon roll calla Ayes: Arihur, Busse, Corcoran;,
Floros Van Geem, wattenberg
Nays: gone
Motion carried.
COMNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS To BE HEARD
None.
PRESENTATIONS:
XA°yORII�RT
GOVERNOR'S
HOMETOWN AWARD
Nancy'Norgan, Human Services AominiStrator, and>
Joy0e skuarla, Head of the Network So Job Placement
Program, presented the Mayor and Board of Trustees
with a plaque honoring the Village
of Mount Prospect
;for winning first place in the Governors Hometown
Awards cOMp titi rn for its achieVements in assisting
older citizens obtain employment.
CAPTAIN JOHN A.
Mayor Farley and Fire Chief Cavello
GIBSON
presented Capt.
John A. Gibson with plaques in ares
recognition of his
retirement following2 years of service With the
Mount Prospect ,Fire Department..
OATHS OF OFFICE:
FIREFIGHTERS
PAUL
Hank Friedrichs, Chairman of the Fire and Police
Commission, adbinistered the Oaths of Office
WOJCIK A34D
to
Firefighter/Paramedic recruits Paul
WILLIAM FOEHRING
Wojcik and
William Foehring.
PROCLAMATION:
FOR
Mayor Farley declared September 2, 1989 as DRIVE FOR
-DRIVE
LIFE DAY
LIFE DAY, a 24 -'hour Observance desi bled t3
public awareness
of the serious pro caused used
drunk driving. problems cby
HERB WEEKS
GREELEY AWARD
Public Works Director, Herb Weeks, was :recognized
for receiving the Greeley Award.,
This award is
presented by the American Public; Works Association
for 30 years of`continuoaa
municipality. s service with one
CLASS "W"
MR. BEEF & PIZZA
An Ordinance waspresented for first reading that
would create one additional "W"
1796 S. ELMHURST
ROAD
Class liquor license
for Mr. Beef & Pizza to permit the sale of beer
wine.'. and
AMEND CH. 13
Trustee Arthur, Seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive
the rule requiring two readings of an
ordinance.;
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,'
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD. NO. 4p,
Trustee Corcoran,ondad by Trustee Fl;oros moved
or passage of Ordinance No 4080
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Watteriberg
Nays: ` None
Motion carried'.
Page 2 - August 15, 1989
A request was presented by the new owners of Alvee's
Liquors, in Mount
ALVEE'S/
Prospect Plaza, to continue doing
FOREMOST
business ander the existing Class "C" liquor
LIQUORS
license, with a name change to Foremost Liquors.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
MOUNT
moved to allow the operation of Foremost Liquors
PROSPECT
under an existing Class "C" liquor license.
PLAZA
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse', Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 9-V-89, 1813 Maya Lana ZBA 39-V-89
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would 1813 MAYA
allow a 10'1 front yard instead of the required 30' in LANE
order to locate a parking pad. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting the request by a vote of 6-0.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at the
next Village Board meeting on September 5.
ZBA 41 -SU -89 and 42-V-89, Kathcon Subdivision
Bonita Lane, east of Busse Road
1. An Ordinance was presented for first reading to
grant a special use to permit garages on Lots 2, 3,
5, and 8 to be 750 sq. ft. in 'size and 650 sq. ft.
on Lots 1 and 9 instead of the 600 sq. foot maximum.
2. An Ordinance was also presented for first reading
to grant variations to permit driveway widths of 30'
tapering to 21 feet at the property line. The
petitioner also requested a two year time period on
these variations.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
waive the second readings required for passage of
Ordinances 4081 and 4082.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTIES ORD.
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1419, 1423, 1435, 1443, 1447, NO. 4081
AND 1451 BONITA LANE
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY ORD.
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1419, 1423, 1435, 1443, 1447, NO. 4082
AND 1451 BONITA LANE
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 40-V-89, St. Paul Lutheran School ZBA 40-V-89
100 South School Street St. Paul
The Petitioner is proposing; to demolish a portion of Lutheran
their existing building in order to rebuild and modernize School
the school. Eight variations have been requested, all of
which the Zoning Board, of appeals approves.
Page 3 - August 15, 1989
ZBA 43-Z-89
WEST
KENSINGTON'
CAR WASH
ZBA 44 -SU -89
ZBA 45- V-89
410 S. MEIER
ROAD
Tne Petitioner is also requesting four
modifications from the Development Code 'aspart
of this same project. The Plan Commission
recommends granting the modifications.
Trustee Eusse, on the advice of the Village
attorneydisclosed that he is a member of the
St. "Paul Lutheran Church ;and had served on the
church's building committee.
Rev., ;Kurt Grotheer appeared before the mayor
and oard of Trustees to ask that the request
be given favorable consideration,
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by "Trustee Wattenberg,
moved to concur with the recommendations of ,both
the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission.
Ordinances for each request will be presented for
:first readings at,the next meeting on September 5.
ZBA 43-Z-89, West Kensington, East of Russel
The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from B-2 to
B-4 to allow a ,full serve car wash. ' The Zoning
Board of Appeals unanimously recommended denying the
request,
p'nroxima ely 200 residents of the area were present
.o stow their Opposition to this Project. Eight
Objectors voiced their concerns,, with most
objections relating to potential` sewer problems and
an increase in traffic.
On the advice of the "pillage attorney, Trustee
Busse indicated that he Would not participate in
the discussion Of the cane ZBA 43-Z-89 and would
abstain from voting.
Trustee Flo,ros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur Frith the 'recOmmendati h of the Zoning
Board of Appeals by denying this request.
The Village Board, with a super majority vote of
5-0 denied the Petitioner's request.
Upon roll call: Ayes:: -Arthur, Corcoran Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Pass: Busse
Motion carried.
Mayor Farley declared a three minute intermission.
ZBA 44-�,SU 8 and 45^-V--89, 410 S. Meier Road
The Petitioner is requesting a special use to
allow a foot -car garage and a 39 'foot driveway
width at that garage instead of the permitted 21
feet,
Page 4 - ,August 15, 198'9
I
The Zoning Board of Appeals has recommended approval
of both the special use, and the variation requests.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to concur with the recommendations of the Zoning
Board of Appeals.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at
the next Village Board meeting on September 5.
ZBA 48-V-89, 1808 Cree Lane ZBA 48-V-89
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a 1808 CREE
7 foot front yard and a 3 foot side yard in order LANE
to provide a vehicle parking pad. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommends granting this request.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur moved
to concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant
the variations requested in ZBA 48-V-89.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the
September 5 meeting of the village Board.
ZBA 49-V-89, Amoco oil, Southwest corner of Wolf & Euclid ZBA 49-V-89
The Petitioner is requesting Development Code AMOCO OIL
modifications and variations from the front and side yard SW CORNER
requirements to permit a complete redevelopment of its EUCLID &
facility. The Petitioner is also requesting a one year WOLF
extension on previously approved (September, 1988)
variations, because it was recently determined that much
of the site is in a flood plain, causing a delay in
construction. Amoco wishes to build a new 24-hour station
with a mini -mart where food would be sold between 6:00 A.M.
and 12:00 midnight. Two residents whose homes are adjacent
to this property expressed their dissatisfaction with the
current appearance and operation of the business. Amoco's
attorney, John Murphy, assured the Village Board that Amoco
will take measures to upgrade its appearance by September 5,
1989.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
grant the Petitioner's requests provided that he correct
the substandard conditions immediately.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next
Village Board meeting on September 5, 1989.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading authorizing NWMC
the sale of various vehicles and equipment presently AUCTION
owned by the Village. The sale will be held on
September 16, 1989 in conjunction with the annual fall
auction sponsored by the Northwest Municipal Conference.
Page 5 - August 15, 1989
ORD.
NO. 4084
BIDS:
PROSPECT
MEADOWS GRANT
RES.
NO. 36-89
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule reiluiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Kays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4083.
AN ORDINANCE AtTTHORIZIN(; THE SALE BY PUBLIC
AUCTION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, van Geem, Wattenberg
Kays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading
authorizing the sale of various items from the
Fire Department onAugust Ia.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Gee=, Wattenberg
Kays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4084.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF PERSONAL
PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll Call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Motion carried. Kays: None
VILLAGE KWAORRIS REPORT
In the absence Of Village 'Manager John Dixon,
Assistant Village''Manager Mike Jahonis, presented
the manager's Report.
A Resolution was presented to accept a grant of
$603,486 from the Illinois Environmental Protection
Agency. These funds are for the rehabilitation of
the Prospect Meadows Sanitary District's sewer
system.
Trustee agose, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to accept the grant offer and enter into an agreement
with the .TEPA with the passage of Resolution No.
36-89.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT SEMEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY -PROSPECT MEADOWS SANITARY
DISTRICT GRANT
Page 6 - August 15, 1989
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
PARKWAY
Van Geem, Wattenberg
TREE
Nays: None
PLANTING
Motion carried.
Bids were received for sanitary sewer rehabilitation
BIDS:
for Prospect Meadows and various Village locations
as follows:
Bidder Amount
SANITARY
Joel Kennedy Construction Co. $526,555
SEWER
REHAB
Vincent DiVito Inc. $670,544
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
JOEL
concur with the recommendation of the administration
KENNEDY
and accept the low bid submitted by Joel Kennedy
CONST.
Construction Co. in the amount of $526,555 for the
CO.
sanitary sewer rehabilitation of Prospect Meadows and
various Village locations.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
INSTALL,
The following bid results were presented for the
PARKWAY
purchase and planting of parkway trees through a
TREE
resident cost -share program:
PLANTING
Bidder Amount
Berthold Nursery $ 99,100
Klehm $102,705
St. Aubin $104,250
Countryside- $151,245
Trustee Van Geem expressed his concerns that the Village
might allow less funding for the piaztLig oz trees, but
was overruled, with all other Board members being in
favor of this project.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
BERTHOLD
accept the bid submitted by Berthold Nursery in an amount
NURSERY
not to exceed $99,200, as budgeted.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Wattenberg
Nays: Van Geem
Motion carried.
After advertising, only one bid was received for services
INSTALL,
to install, replace, and test water meters on a two year
REPLACE,
contract; this being from HBK Water Meter Service Co.
& TEST
WATER MTRS
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
HBK WATER
accept the bid from HBK in an amount not to exceed
METER SERVICE
$42,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - August 15, 1989
VIAN
CONSTRUCTION
COMPANY'
The, following bids were received for the Forest
Avenue Water Main Replacement (Memory Ln. to
Kensington),;
Bidder Amount
Vian Construction $254,209.00
John Redina Construction $274,217.50
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur,
moved to concur with the recommendation of the
administration andaccept the "low bid of
$54209.00 from Vian Construction Co.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros,'Van Geem Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried,
LINCOLN
Donohue 'Engineering Company has
p y
STREET
BRIDGE
prepared a study on
the rehabilitation of tae bridge'on Lincoln Street,
REHAB
over Weller Creek, and offered three Options for this
woet. Staff has +reco nded acceptance
of Option I',
which will cost approximately $4°x,000. Staff is
now
recomendin that Donahue Engineering Co. be
retained for the purpose of developing
reconstruction drawings, bid specifications, and
inspection services in
an amount not to exceed
$31, Soil.
DONOHUE'
ENGINEERING
COMPANY
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee F'loros, moved
to award Donohue Engineering Company
e contract
for the design, bidding, and inspection of the
.Lincoln Street
Bridge rehabilitation project.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
LEAF DUMPING
EXPENDITURE
On, a motion+y Trustee Arthur and seconded by Trustee
Van Goem, an expenditure $146,006
,of was approved for
the purpose of preserving damping;
rights for leaves
Collected as part of the"ill'ag#'$ leaf pick-up
,program. This expenditure, would fallow the Village
to dump leaves
at an organic farm in Barrington.
Upon roll call; Ayes: Arthur, Busse; Corcoran,
Flores, van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried,
OPTICOM
EQUIPMENT
A Resolution was presented that would authorize the
Village to
INSTALLATION
enter into an agreement for the
installation of Opticom eqUipment,onRiver Road
at
designated intersections.
RES. NO. 37-89
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved:
for of Resolution
,passage No. 37_89.
Page 8 - August 15,; 1989
0
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION ON AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
RELATIVE TO THE INSTALLATION OF OPTICON
EQUIPMENT ON RIVER ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes; Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented in conjunction with the MOTOR
Opticom Agreement which would authorize the Village FUEL
to appropriate $17,250 in Motor Fuel Tax Funds to TAX FUNDS
cover its share of the installation of Opticom
equipment on River Road.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved RES.
for passage of Resolution No. 38-89. NO. 38-89
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
Upon roll call: --Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Mays: None
Motion carried.
Assistant Village Manager, Mike Jannis, reported on
the progress of the Central Road construction. Due to
the unusual amount of rain this season, work has
been delayed significantly, and a mid -fall completion
date is projected.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Trustee Corcoran expressed his concern for several flood STOP VALVES
areas within the Village and suggested that Board FOR FLOOD
members consider proposing an ordinance which would AREAS
allow residents to participate in an interest-free
payment plan to obtain stop valves to prevent sanitary
sewer back-ups into homes.
ADJOURN
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:55 P.M.
Velma W. Lowe
Assistant Village Clerk
Page 9 - August 15, 1989
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
August 31, 1989
Cash & Invest. Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest.
Balance 8/11/89 Through Per Attached Journal Balance
8/10/89 8/31/89 List of Bills Entry 8/31/89
$ 2,007,740
$ 2,993,784
$ 754,665
($3,000) $ 4,243,859
814,603
86,575
52,080
849,098
182
54,000
53,343
839
443
202,195
20,718
181,920
2,888,072
978,387
82,258
3,784,201
208,994
9,376
2,100
216,270
1,240,823
11,696
61,458
1,191,061
487,210
206,839
6,122
687,927
342,517
1,122
875
342,764
309
-
1,802
3,000 1,507
834,266
467,101
-
1,301,367
935
2,160
3,095
1,330,666
29,216
66,060
1,293,822
13,700,436
201,555
43,587
13,858,404
15,752,982
193,288
35,088
15,911,182
3,542
-
-
3,542
$39,613.720
$ 5,437,294
$ 1,180,156
- $43,870,858
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE I
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AML CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
AMERICAN REMODELING
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
H. 0. ANDERSON
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$13.68
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.32
$15.00
JAMES ANDERSON
REFUND REAL EST TRF TAX #2013
$220.00
$220.00
APEX AMUSEMENT
ELECTRONIC GAMS LIC REFUND
$400.00
$400.00
BEL-AIR PLUMBING
BOND REFUND
$75.00
CASS & ASSC.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.06
CEISEL MASONRY
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
CHRISTIAN LIFE COLLEGE
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$9.12
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.88
$10.00
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PYMT-HELFENBEIN
$224.25
$224.25*
CUSTOM DECKS BY MOYER
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
CUSTOMIZED DECKING
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
CUSTOM WOOD WORKS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
DARLENE DAWIDCZYK
SEWER
$1.32
WATER
$14.68
$16.00
DELTA TOOL CO., INC.
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$50.16
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.84
$55.00
DFCC INC.
STORM SEWER IMPRVMT
$3,749.58
$3,749.58
DIAMOND SIGN CO
BOND REFUND
$250.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
BOND REFUND
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/11 RETRO
$250.00
$32,027.36
$500.00
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/24/89
$360,999.49
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/24/89
$1,464.39
x
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/24/89
$451.33
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/24/89
$30,862.03
$425,804.60*
DOYLE SIGNS, INC.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$200.00
RICHARD FERGUS
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$4.56
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.44
$5.00
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PRO
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/24/89
$33.89
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/24/89
$694.19
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/24/89
$10,549.31
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/24/89
$109.97
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/24/89
$2,317.74
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/10/89
$10,168.56
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/10/89
$129.64
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/10/89
$39.30
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/10/89
$2,419.20
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 8/10/89
$628.37
R. GAMBINO
DUE TO FEDERAL DEP. PAY OF 08-11-89
$94.99
$27,185.16*
GARRETT GOERKE
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND HEALTH INS CONTRIB
$5.16
$5.16
HELEN L. GROH
OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL
$1.25
$1.25
GULDEN-BITTEL SEWER SERV.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
HANSEN'S LANDSCAPING
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
VICTOR HERNER
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$100.00
JOE HOLIK
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$125.00
MARK HORNING
BOND REFUND
$20.00
$20.00
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$140.00
ROBERT IOVINO
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
MR. GEORGE KOVOROS
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$100.00
$2.28
$100.00
JOSEPH KUCHAR
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.22
$2.50
FINAL WATER BILL DUPL PYMT
$38.76
LAUREL CONST
FINAL WATER BILL DUPL PYMT
$3.74
$42.50
LES & SONS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BRIAN LOVITSCH
BOND REFUND
$800.00
$800.00
GEORGE MACK
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BILL MAGLARES
BOND REFUND
ESCROW DEP REFUND
$100.00
$100.04
VINCE MANGANELLO
BOND REFUND
$14,250.00
$14,250.00*
$100.00
AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION
BOND REFUND
SOFTWARE
$100.00
$200.00
NANCY J. MORRISON
PKG TICKET REFUND
$4,269.00
$4,269.00
MT. PROSPECT HTG. & AIR CONDIT
BOND REFUND
$10.00
$10.00*
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
PPRT 6TH ALLOC
$100.00
$100.00
NGK SPARK PLUGS INC.
BOND REFUND
$284.39
$284.39*
NORTH SHORE SIGNS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
$100.00
JOHN G. O'BRIEN
BOND REFUND
REFUND REAL ESTATE TRF TAX
$100.00
$200.00
$204.00
$204.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/32/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
GUNNAR OLSON
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$95.76
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$9.24
$105.00
OPUS
BOND REFUND
$500.00
REFUND -LANDSCAPING
ESCROW
$42,016.00
$42,516.00
DOROTHY OSTERKORN
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$1.10
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$11.40
$12.50
JAVANTI S. PATEL
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$7.92
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$82.08
$90.04
ADELINE PEARSON
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$72.96
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$6.59
$79.55
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
AUG POLICE PENSION
DISB
$43,586.61
AUG FIRE PENSION DISB
$35,087.95
$78,674.56*
PEPPER CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$475.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$575.00
JIM PHOTOPOULOS
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
MR. ROBERT RIEGER
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$6.84
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$.66
$7.50
R J & G SEWER
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$500.00
ROYAL FUEL
FUEL
$4,846.44
FUEL
$7,653.95
$12,500.3
SATURN SIGNS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$300.00
SDM REALTY
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$20.52
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$1.98
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$20.52
REFUND FINAL
WATER
BILL
$1.98
$45.00
SHAMROCK DEVELOPMENT
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
MARY SHEEHY
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
BOND REFUND
$35.00
$160.00
LEE SMITH
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PACE 4
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
STEVEN R. SMITH
PKC TICKET REFUND
GEORGE SOLLITT CONST.
BOND REFUND
$10.00
$10.04*
MR. CHRISTOPHER SPEAR$504.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$500.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.28
STATE OF ILLINOIS
LIQ LIC RECORD CHECK
$.22
$2.50
STANLEY STAWKIEWICZ
BOND REFUND
$120.00
$120.00 *
W. STEINFORTH
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
MR. ALAN SWANSON
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$75.00
$75,0(
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$2.28
TED'S LAWN & GARDEN
BOND REFUND
$.22
$2.50
R. TRAGAS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$104.00
MR. GEORGE URDA
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$100.00
$100.00
$4.56
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
BOND REFUND
$.44
$5.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$25.00
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
$50.00
BOND REFUND
$25.00
BOND REFUND
$25.40
$30.00
BOND REFUND
BOND REFUND
$25.00
BOND REFUND
$25.00
BOND REFUND
$25.00
BOND REFUND
$15.00
GUS VRETTOS
BOND REFUND
$15.00
$460.00
R.J. WALDORF
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00$144.00
LAW OFFICES OF EDWARD G WELLS
REFUND OF REAL ESTATE TRF TAX
$100.00
ALLAN WOZNIAK
BOND REFUND
$133.00
$133.04*
ZACK BROTHERS REG.$75.00
BONd REFUND
$75.00
$35.00
$35.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$620,006.89
GENERAL FUND
$408,206.18 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$3,749.58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,704.00 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $20,717.87
WATER & SEWER FUND $40,364.77 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $524.52
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $5.16 POLICE PENSION FUND $43,586.61
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $35,087.95 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$66,060.25
********************************************************************************************************
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
REGISTRATION
$35.00
$35.00*
MOUNT PROSPECT COUNTRY CLUB
GIFT - CHAMBER OUTING
$35.00
$35.00
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
GOLF OUTING
$88.00
$88.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$30.00
$98.81
EDWARD CAVELLO
MISC EXPENSES
$55.00
$85.00*
V & G PRINTERS INC.
ART WORK
$75.00
$75.00
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND $318.00
***TOTAL** $318.00
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
AIR FARE
$138.00
$138.00
BURKE AND RYAN
LEGAL SERVICES
$1,390.
$1,390.00
CALLAGHAN & COMPANY
FORMS
$98.8811
$98.81
EDWARD CAVELLO
MEETING EXPENSE
$50.00
$50.00
JOHN F. DIXON
EXPENSES
$600.00
$600.00
HEWLETT PACKARD
SUPPLIES
$232.50
$232.50
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
EMPLYMT PHYS
$232.00
$232.00
ICMA
CONFERENCE
$449.00
$449.00*
MICHAEL E. JANONIS
CONFERENCE
$580.00*
$580.00
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
EXCHANGE PROGRAM
$176.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
EXCHANGE PROGRAM
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$60.00
$236.00
$91.08
PETTY GASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC EXPENSES
$99.20
$190.28
MISC EXPENSES
$80.20
MISC EXPENSES
$12.00
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
SUPPLIES, MEETING, TRAVEL
$7.55
$28.96
$99.75*
THE ROTARY CLUB
ADVERTISEMENT
$28.96
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$30.00
$30.00
$1,727.28
$1,727.28
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$6,082.58
GENERAL FUND
$6,082.58
********************************************************************************************************
CABLE TV OPERAIiONS
ARA/CORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES
SUPPLIES
CHICAGO ACCESS CORPORATION
ENTRY FEES
$23.95
$23.95
CORTEZ DIXONV
LG BOARD PRODUCTION
$40.00
$40.00
KAREN GIET
EXPENSES ADVANCE
.00
$50$50.96
$50.40
ITVA CHICAGO CHAPTER
ENTRY FEES
$
$234.96-
234.96MULTICHANNEL
MULTICHANNELNEWSSUBSCRIPTION
$70.00
$70.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$29.00
$29.00$106.44
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC EXPENSES
$12 1.89
$228.33
REAL GRAPHIX
NEWSLETTER
$21.18
$40.18*
ROSCOR CORPORATION
REPAIR
$265.00
$265.00
STATE OF THE ART
SUPPLIES
$498.44
$498 . 44
$79.05
$98.44
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
***TOTAL**
$1,558.91
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCEIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $1,558.91
********************************************************************************************************
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DECISION DATA SERVICE INC.
MAINT - SEPT
$77.00
$77.00
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MAINT FOR COMPUTERS & PRINTER -AUG
$189.00
$232.50
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
MAINT FOR COMPUTERS & PRINTER -AUG
$52.00
$241.01
MONROE SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESS, I
RIBBON CARTRIDGES
$75.08
$75.08
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$1.75
*
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
MISC EXPENSES
$6.53
$8.28*
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$116.31
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$37.85
$154.16
WESTON SYSTEMS COMPANY, INC.
DATA PROCESSING SERV
$1,045.00
$1,045.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
LEGAL NOTICE
***TOTAL**
$1,600.52
GENERAL FUND
$1,600.52
$104.65
$389.02
********************************************************************************************************
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
THE HERALD
AD
$48.88
$48.88
HEWLETT PACKARD
SUPPLIES
$232.50
$232.50
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
PLAQUE
$24.00
$24.O0
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$22.71
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$20.94
$43.65
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
$54.60
LEGAL NOTICE
$56.87
LEGAL NOTICE
$54.60
LEGAL NOTICE
$54.60
LEGAL NOTICE
$63.70
LEGAL NOTICE
$104.65
$389.02
VENDOR
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
POSTMASTER
STERLING CODIFIERS, INC.
A.A. SWIFT PRINT, INC.
V & G PRINTERS INC.
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER
SUPPLEMENTS
NEWSLETTER
BUS CARDS
$6,284.60
PAGE 8
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$2,298.05
$2,298.05*
$496.00
$496.00
$2,701.50
$2,701.50
$51.00
$51.00
***TOTAL**
$6,284.60
********************************************************************************************************
RISK MANAGEMENT
HMO ILLINOIS
JACKSON, LONG & ASSOCIATES, IN
HEALTH INSURANCE SEPT
$5'1.
$5,108.04*
JACKSON, LONG & ASSOCIATES
JACKSON LONG -ADMIN FEES -SEPT
JACKSON LONG
$7,14455. 229 9
$7,145.29
AUG 9-15
$2,465.69
*
JACKSON LONG AUG 16-22
$30,375.98
GREG ROSENBERG
JACKSON LONG AUG 23-29
$15,004.72
$47,846.39*
STATE TREASURER OF ILLINOIS
CLAIM SETTLEMENT
2ND INJURY FD ASSESS
$1,350.00
$1,350.00*
$3.54
$3.54
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$61,453.26
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$61,453.26
********************************************************************************************************
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL SERVICES RENDERED $370.00
SERVICES $65.00
SERVICES $65.00
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
B & I FURNITURE COMPANY, INC.
CAREFUL ANIMAL REMOVAL & EVIG.
COMPUTERLAND
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO.
HALOGEN SUPPLY COMPANY INC
PETER MCDERMOTT
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE EQUIPMENT SALES CO.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
QUALEX, INC.
RED WING SHOE STORE
KELLY P. REYNOLDS & ASSOCIATES
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATT
XEROX CORP.
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SERVICES
$65.00
SERVICES
$65.00
SERVICES
$65.00
PEST CONTROL
$240.00
$935.00
OFFICE PARTITIONS
$1, .10
$1,884.10
SERVICES RENDERED
$20.00
$20.00
COMP EQUIP
$1,484.00
$1,484.0
ENG SUPPLIES
$65.50
$65.5
SUPPLIES
$15.33
$15.33
REIMBURSEMENT
$65.00
$65.00
SUPPLIES
$54.00
$54.00
MISC SUPPLIES
$19.00
RIBBONS
$14.16
$33.16
FILES
$450.00
$450.00
MISC EXPENSES
$3.05
$3.05*
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$11.07
$11.07
WORK BOOTS
$9I.50
$91.50
RESERVATION
$350.00
$350.00
CHAIR
$258.00
$258.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$5.00
$5 $5.00
ELEV INSPECTIONS
$50.00
ELEV INSPECTIONS
$25.00
$75.00
CABLE
$19.00
$19.00
PRINTWHEELS
$36.70
$36.7q
***TOTAL**
$5,855.41
$5,405.41
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND
$450.00
********************************************************************************************************
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $192.05
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ALLEN TESTPRODUCTS
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
JOSEPH BELMONTE
MARK BONNER
JACK BROGAN
BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH,
RENEE A. BUSSER
CALUMET PHOTOGRAPHIC INC
CENTRAL AUTO PAINT
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION FO
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPUTERLAND
EVERSON ROSS COMPANY
FAULTLESS CASTER DIVISION
BARBARA FELTEN
FREDRIKSEN & SONS
FULL CIRCLE STUDIO INC.
GOVERNMENT PERSONNEL CONSULTAN
HAINES & COMPANY
H R HART PHOTO
HEWLETT PACKARD
HOMAK HOME SECURITY
I . C. P.A.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS STATE POLICE
KALE UNIFORMS
LATTOF MOTOR SALES CO.
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
FILTERS
WIRE SET
$13.00
$21.43
FILTERS
SERVICE
$185.07
$695.00
MISC AUTO PARTS
$81.35
EXPENSES
$314.00
EXPENSES
$150.00
EXPENSES
$150.00
WASH PLAN - JULY
$280.00
EXPENSES
$10.51
PRINT DRYER
$238.45
PAINT SUPPLIES -JULY
$14.37
SUPPLIES
$249.52
UPDATE SERV
$20.00
BH66-JT-5422-A
$8.57
RIBBONS
$74.00
SUPPLIES
$11.33
REPAIR PARTS
$87.55
EXPENSES
$6.00
RECHARGES
$150.75
ART WORK
$80.00
TESTING
$600.00
LEASE
$181.87
FILM PROCESS
$96.85
PRODUCT MAINTENANCE
$595.80
PRODUCT MAINT
.4 0
$42$92.40
CABINET
$
MEMBERSHIP
.00
$50$50.03
750 9 15 G
$
TUITION
$370.00
SUPPLIES
$397.40
MISC AUTO PARTS -JULY
$743.59
SUPPLIES
$37.78
SUPPLIES
$53.75
SUPPLIES
$53.75
SUPPLIES
$53.75
PAGE 10
TOTAL
$411.55
$695.00
$81.35
$314.00
$150.06
$150.00
$280.00
$10.51
$238.45
$14.37
$249.52
$20. 00
$8. 57
$74.00
$11.33
$87.55
$6.00
$150.75
$80.00
$600.00
$181.87
$96.85
$688.20
$114.90
$50.00
$138.03
$370.00*
$397.40
$743.59
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31%89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
SUPPLIES
$53.78
$252.81
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
P-8 CONVERSION
$834.55
P-8 CONVERSION
$111.14
P-6 CONVERSION
$140.84
P-6 CONVERSION
$833.90
P-12 CONVERSIO;:
$833.90
P-12 CONVERSION
$167.94
$2,922.27(
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
REPAIRS
$65.00
$65.00`
JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC.
CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.00
CARLOS MITCHEM
EXPENSES
$150.00
$150.00
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
AUTO PARTS - JULY
$163.04
$163.04
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI
TUITION
$120.00
$120.00
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PKG TICKETS
$1,8.75
$1' 8.75
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$3 .43
$$9
$3 8.93
$3
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$9.90
*
MISC EXPENSES
$42.00
MISC EXPENSES
$98.16
MISC EXPENSES
$4.20
MISC EXPENSES
$5.44
MISC EXPENSES
$7.36
$167.06*
ERIC E. PIEE
RADIO REPAIRS
$328.50
RADIO REPAIRS
$693.50
$1,022.00
VINCENT PRESCOTT
EXPENSES
$314.00
$314.00
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
STRAYS - JULY
$642.00
$642.00
SAVE -A -PET
STRAYS -JULY
$315.00
$315.00'-
JEFFREY SCHMITZ
EXPENSES
$150.00
$150.00
SCHWEPPE & SONS
EVID BAGS
$33.31
$33.31
RODNEY SMITH
EXPENSES
$150.00
$150.00
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TUITION
$450.00
$450.00
JOSEPH J. TRUNCALE, PH.D. & AS
SUPPLIES
$290.00
$290.00
TRW INFORMATION SERVICES
RECORD CHECKS
$3.25
RECORD CHECKS
$7.25
$10.50
V & G PRINTERS INC.
PRINTING EXPENSE
$78.00
$78,00
VILLAGE SPORTS CENTER, INC.
SUPPLIES
$42.00
$42.00
WEST PUBLISHING CO.
BOOKS
$107.00
BOOKS
$124.00
$231.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
WIPECO INC
RAGS
WISCONSIN CARTRIDGE CO.
9 MM LUGER
$263.33
$263.33
"Z" FRANK OLDSMORTLF
AIR PUMP
$874. 04
SR70_OO
$131.47
$131.47
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$17,264.26
GENERAL FUND
$17,264.26
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ABLE FIRE SAFETY EQUIP
PART
GAUGE
$460.00
ACIUS
UPGRADE
$65.47
$525.47
REGISTRATION
$95.25
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS
00
$395.00
$490.25
KEYS
$59.00
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES, INC
LINEN SERV -AUG
$189.74
$248,74
LINEN SERV -AUG
$116.50
LINEN SERV -AUG
$70.27
CELLULAND OF ARLINGTON HTS.
CELLULAR PHONE
$72.42
$259.19
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
070 0057060 0
$1,685.00
$1,685.06
CHERRY'S TRUCK PARTSEQUIP
MAINT
I
$142.30
$142.30
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
CREDIT MEMOS
OS
$1,468.45
$1,468.45
COMPARTMENT LITES
$38.40
DUO -SAFETY LADDER CORPORATION
LABELS & STICKERS
$46.40
$84.40$64.55
LADDER
ARTHUR FELSKI - F.D.
EXPENSES
$308.25
$372.80
EXPENSES
$180.00
FRONTLINE CORPORATION
SWITCH
$14.00
$194.00
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
SUPPLIES
$130.25
$130.25
SUPPLIES
$51.39
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
$53.35
$104.74
$527.14
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
PAGE 13
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
H R HART PHOTO
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
LONNIE JACKSON
KAR PRODUCTS INC
RAYMOND KORDECKI
J. E. KREGER & CO.
LATTOF MOTOR SALES CO.
CHARLES LIVINGSTON
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
JOHN MALCOLM - F.D.
MASTER HITCH, INC.
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS
MKM DISTRIBUTORS
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SONS
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OLSTEN OF CHICAGO INC.
PARADISE TOURS INC.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
PHYSIO -CONTROL
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
LIGHT
PHOTO SUPPLIES
398-6389
575 9 15 G
244 9 15 G
EXPENSES
REPAIR PARTS
EXPENSES
REFL LETTERS
CRUISE CONTROL
EXPENSES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
EXPENSES
TRAILER HITCH
SUPPLIES
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
MAINT AGRMT
FIRE PREV FLYERS
PLAQUE
CELLULAR SERV
ELEC PARTS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
TEMP SECRY SERV
AIRLINE TICKETS
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
SUPPLIES, MEETING,
CABLE SVC
WATER PUMP
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
TRAVEL
$28.33
$556.03
$34.10
$34.10
$30.70
$416.77
$23.78
$471.25
$50.00
$50.00
$242.27
$242.2
$50.00
$50.0,
$150.00
$150.00
$250.00
$250.00
$624.53
$624.53
$43.72
$43.72
$50.00
$50.00
$136.40
$136.40
$85.43
$163.29
$248.72
$255.00
$255.00
$423.50
$423.50
$36.54
$36.54
$32.03
$32.03
$205.34
$205.34
$67.80
$67.80
$1,080.00
$1,080.00
$446.00
$446.0
$4.15
n
$11.76
$14.83
$47.35
$24.02
$5.00
$18.73
$39.92
$24.00
$16.03
$205.79*
$150.00
$150.00
$238.27
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
********************************************************************************************************
KIT
CORE RETURNED
$33.20
SOCIETY OF FIRE PROTECTION ENG
MEMBERSHIP
$118.99-
$152.48
SPARTAN MOTORS INC.
PARTS
$95.00
$95.00
TECH SYN CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$44.06
$44.06
TERMINAL SUPPLY CO
PARTS
$58.14
$58.14
PARTS
$304.32
PARTS
$14.09
TRW INFORMATION SERVICES
RECORD CHECKS
$237.45
$555.86
D. WISNIEWSKI - F.D.
EXPENSES
$29.25
$29.25
$60.00
$60.00
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
***TOTAL**
$12,509.40
GENERAL FUND
$12,364.63 CAPITAL IMPRV.
& REPL. FUND
$144.77
********************************************************************************************************
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
SENIOR CAB RIDES
SENIOR CAB RIDES
$921,00
ELK GROVE TAXI
SENIOR CAB RIDES
$849.00
$1,770.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
PHONE SERVICE
$74.85
$74.85
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$137.45
$137.45
MISC EXPENSES
ENSE
$27 OO
*
SHELTER, INC.
BUDGET AENSEND PYMT
$22.30
$49.30*
$2,125.00
$2,125.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$4,156.60
GENERAL FUND
$4,156.60
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
CLEMSON UNIVERSITY
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
JOURNAL & TOPICS NEWSPAPERS
MICHAEL J. MORAN
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PEDDLE ELECTRIC
QUALEX, INC.
REI TITLE SERVICES
RICHARD SHEPPARD PHOTOGRAPHY
VANS ARTISTS DESIGNERS SUPPLIE
WHEELING GLASS COMPANY
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8%31(89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MEMBERSHP DUES
PART PYMT INTERN SALARY
ELEC SERVICE
MARKETING DISPLAY AD
SERVICES RENDERED
OFFICE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
MISC EXPENSES
PROSPECT AVE CONTRACT
FILM & DEV
TITLE SEARCH
PHOTO
SUPPLIES
CDBG
PAGE 15
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$98.00
$98.00
$1,808.00
$1,808.00
$325.57
$325.57
$789.00
$789.00
$234.00
$234.00
$17.40
$47.25
$64.65{
$21.10
$21.10
$50,662.84
$50,662.84
$119.17
$119.17
$75.00
$75.00
$12.00
$12.00
$10.90
$10.90
$243.34
$243.34
***TOTAL** $54,463.57
$2,824.82 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $51,638.75
T-
STREET DIVISION
ACTION CONCRETE & SUPPLY
CEMENT
$30.00 $30.00
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$60.28
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$69.37
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$3.67
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$261.13
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$57.47
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$19.74
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$13.91
BLDG SUPPLIES
- JULY
$16.63 $502.20
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$69.09
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
FILTERS -
PARTS
$302.11
?T
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANYrAVNG
SUPPLIES
$40. 64
$4i 1 .84
PAVING SUPPLIES
$584.80
PAVING SUPPLIES
7 .00
$4$47.00
PAVING SUPPLIES
$
PAVING SUPPLIES
$184.00
PAVING SUPPLIES
$54.00
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES, IN
SUPPLIES
$59.00
$1,209.80
SUPPLIES
$114.82
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
GASOLINE
$117.61
$232.43
AMP PRODUCTS CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$31.43
$31.43
SUPPLIES
$42.22
SUPPLIES
$12.48
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS
$42.67
$47.37
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
PARTS
$8.50
$8.50
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
PAVING MATERIAL
$16.04
$16.04
PAVING MATERIAL
$654.00
PAVING MATERIALS
$474.00
PAVING SUPPLIES
$579.00
ASTROBLAST INC.
PARTS SANDBLASTED
$963.00
$2,670.00
BILL'S LAWN & POWER
PARTS
$415.00
$415.00
PARTS
$36.78
B. J. BRAUN
WATER TANK RENTAL
$152.47
$189.25
BRISTOL HOSE & FITTING
FITTING
$150.00
$150.00
BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH,
VEH WASHES - JULY
$36.80
$36.80
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$124.95
$124.95
CENTRAL AUTO PAINT
PAINT SUPPLIES -JULY
$454.50
$454.50
PAINT SUPPLIES -JULY
$9
CHEMGROUT
PINS & WASHERS
$8.56
$8.84
$974.40
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$74.15
$74.15
ARTHUR CLESEN, INC.
SUPPLIES
$369.31
$369.31
SUPPLIES
$280.00
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM RENTAL
$74.70
$354.74
UNIFORM RENTAL
$41.881
1
UNIFORM RENTAL
$77.81
$20.86
$190.48
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8(31%89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BF80-JT-17006
$95.60
$95.60
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
JANITORIAL SERV
$128.00
CLEANING SERV
$1,836.00
$1,964.00
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
WATER USAGE
$69.67
$69.67
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
FUEL PUMP
$33.79
$33.79
DOOR SYSTEMS, INC.
SERVICE
$295.13
$295.13
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
TIRE REPAIRS
$37.50
$37.5Q
FOREST TREE SERVICE, INC.
TREE TRIMMING
$3,111.25
i
TREE TRIMMING
$1,344.06
TREE TRIMMING
$3,584.16
$8,039.47
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC.
GLOVES
$25.03
$25.03
HANS GESTRICH
SIDEWALK REPL
$61.50
$61.50
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
PAINT SUPPLIES
$19.26
$19.26
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
REPAIRS
$169.68
$169.68
P J HARTMANN COMPANY
REPAIR
$200.00
$200.00
HELLER LUMBER CO.
LUMBER SUPPLIES JULY
$48.32
LUMBER SUPPLIES JULY
$30.20
LUMBER SUPPLIES JULY
$206.40
$284.92
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO.
SUPPLIES
$43.55
SUPPLIES
$18.87
$62.42
ILLINOIS TRUCK & EQUIPMENT CO.
REPAIR PARTS
$195.89
SUPPLIES
$203.62
$399.51
J.R.& V. CONSTRUCTION, CO.
SIDEWALK PROGRAM
$11,699.88
SIDEWALK PROGRAM
$15,940.90
$27,640.12
STANLEY M KOBAYASHI
SIDEWALK REPL
$82.00
$82.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL JULY 1989
$480.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL JULY 1989
$480.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL 1484
$480.00
$1,440.00
LATTOF MOTOR SALES CO.
MISC AUTOPARTS-JULY
$159.08
MISC AUTO PARTS -JULY
$17.29
$176.37
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL, INC
CAR RENTALS
$2,305.38
$2,305.38
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
$ .2211
$115959
MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
$64.90
MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
$11.80
MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
$11.80
$247.71
MARTAM CONSTRUCTION, INC.
PROSPECT AVE RECONSTR
$67,059.00
$67,059.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAGE 18
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
PAVING MATL
PAVING MATL
$409.63
LIMESTONE SCREENINGS
$85.80
ROGER MEYER
LIMESTONE SCREENINGS
$413. 2b
$686.58
$1,594.47
HAULING 6116 - 7/21
$506.00
HAULING 6/16 - 7121
$506.00
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
HAULING 6/16 - 7/21
REPAIRS
$506.00
$1,518.0(
REPAIRS
$25.00
MOTOROLA, INC.
PAGER & RADIO EQUIP
$150.00
PAGER & RADIO EQUIP
$3,
$3,109.00
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
AUTO PARTS - JULY
$618.00
$3,727'00
AUTO PARTS - JULY
$.94
NAPA AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$23.64
$23
$479.58
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
FRAME
$153.81
$153.81
NESSEN COMPANY
REGISTRATION
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1601 GOLF RD
$50.00
$50.00*
14 E BUSSE AVE
$105.54
112 E NORTHWEST HWY
$80.08
$168.44
11 S PINE ST
$72.60
100 S EMERSON ST
$67.26
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
110 E NORTHWEST HWY
ELEC SUPPLIES - JULY
$66.42
$560.34
ELEG SUPPLIES - JULY
$271.09
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
PARTS
$595.89
$866.98
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$14'06
$14.06
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$94.53
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
SUPPLIES, MEETING, TRAVEL
$169'88
$264.33
SUPPLIES, MEETING, TRAVEL
$.98
*
PETTY CASH - FUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$6
$6'09
$21'01*
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3.75
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$3.52
$6.79
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$25.74
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$23.53
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$60.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$32.43
*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31%89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
********************************************************************************************************
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$64.18
$220.49*
PERMATHANE
SWEEPER SHOES
$196.66
$196.66
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
$401.22
ED PONTARELLI CONSTRUCTION CO.
PARTS
INSTALL PIPE & CATCH BASIN
$88.53
$3,053.00
$489.75
PROSAFETY
INSTALL PIPE & CATCH BASIN
$417.00
$3,470.00
RADIO SHACK
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$58.73
$58.2gf
ROWLAND'S EQUIPMENT, INC.
SUPPLIES
$147.25
$147.2`
S & S HEATING SALES & SERVICE
INSTALL FAUCET
$333.68
$35.00
$333.68
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
SUPPLIES
$227.66
$35.00
SUPPLIES
$77.35
SECRETARY OF STATE
SUPPLIES
TITLE UNIT 4501
$52.72
$357.73
EDWARD STAUBER WHOLESALE HDW
GLASSLITE
$3.00
$325.00
$3.00*
TECH SYN CORPORATION
HYDR HOSE ASSY
$87.25
$325.00
MRS. N. THOMPSON
SIDEWALK REPL
$102.50
$87.25
$102.50
TREASURER, STATE OF ILLINOIS
MANIFESTS
$20.00
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
RICHARD
CURB & GUTTER PROGRAM
$48,330.00
$20.00*
$48,330.00
UGOLINI
SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
TOM ULIGK
VERMEER-ILLINOIS
LEAF DISPOSAL
$16,000.00
$16,000.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
STABILIZERS
17 S WILLE ST WATER BILL
$300.00
$300.00
WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC SUPPLY C
LIGHT FIXTURES
$2.50
$203.42
$2.50
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
PARTS
$203.42
$183.86
WIPECO INC
MANUALS
$95.45
$279.31
RAGS
$263.33
$263.33
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$201,438.11
GENERAL FUND
$149,081.11 MOTOR FUEL
TAX FUND
$48,330.00
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND
$4,027.00
********************************************************************************************************
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
A-1 TIME RECORDER CO. INC.
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
AMP PRODUCTS CORPORATION
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
BADGER METER INC
BUHRKE INDUSTRIES, INC.
BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH,
CADE INDUSTRIES
CENTRAL AUTO PAINT
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONRAD AND SON
CONSOLIDATED STEEL AND SUPPLY
CORADIAN CORPORATION
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
ENGINEMASTERS, INC.
FRANZ OFFICE PRODUCTS
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31%89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$84.27
$84.27
BLDG SUPPLTES - JULY
$]0.17
BLDG SUPPLIES - JULY
$23.41
BLDG SUPPLIES - JULY
$44.29
BLDG SUPPLIES - JULY
$14.64
$97.46
PARTS
$102.71
FILTERS
$96.19
$198.9(
GASOLINE
$10.00
$10.00
SUPPLIES
$42.21
SUPPLIES
$12.47
SUPPLIES
$42.66
$97.34
MISC AUTO PARTS
$301.98
$301.98
FILM
$76.60
$76.60
REPAIRS
$124.46
PARTS
$34.40
PARTS
$70.12
$229.48
PAVING MATERIAL
$168.00
PAVING SUPPLIES
$168.00
$336.00
REMOTE READERS
$1,200.00
METERS
$2,278.50
$3,478,50
PARTS
$350.00
$350.00
VEH WASHES - JULY
$86.76
$86.76
SUPPLIES
$402.50
$402.50
PAINT SUPPLIES -JULY
$144.94
$144.94
UNIFORM RENTAL
$91.81
UNIFORM RENTAL
$77.80
UNIFORM RENTAL
$20.85
$190.46
BJ80-JT-23598
$5,371.10
$5,371.10
BH67-JT-1310-A
$181.54
$181.54
SWEEPER
$455.00
$455.00
TUBING
$203.50
$203.50
SERVICE LABOR
$600.00
$600.00
TIRE REPAIRS
$49.20
$49.20
OIL FILTERS
$19.80
$19.80
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$248.45
$248.45
REPAIRS
$551.04
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
HOWELL TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CO.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC
ILLINOIS LIFT TRUCK CORP.
ILLINI POWER PRODUCTS COMPANY
IL. POTABLE WATER SUP OPERATOR
LATTOF MOTOR SALES CO.
LEWIS INTERNATIONAL INC.
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
M&M RADIO LAB.
JERRY MCINTOSH
ROGER MEYER
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
MOTOROLA
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NET MIDWEST, INC.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REPAIRS
$169.68
$720.72
PARTS
$767.59
$767.59
MAINT FOR COMPUTERS & PRINTER -AUG
$189,00
MAINT FOR COMPUTERS & PRINTER -AUG
$52.00
$241.00
153 9 15 G
$15.54
575 9 15 G
$17.19
303 9 3G S
$19.90
PHONE SERVICE
$15.55
l
155 9 15 C
$18.42
$86.60
SUPPLIES
$618.44
$618.44
FORK LIFT TRACTOR
$18,125.00
$18,125.00
SEAL
$7.08
$7.08
C
CONFERENCE
$35.00
$35.00
MISC AUTO PARTS -JULY
$130.56
$130.56
SUPPLIES
$104.34
$104.34
MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
$7.05
MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
$100.83
$107.88
PIPE LOCATORS
$1,192.50
$1,192.50
CONFERENCE
$245.00
$245.00
HAULING 6/16 - 7/21
$1,888.27
$1,888.27
REPAIRS
$22.00
$22.00
REPAIRS
$88.00
$88.00
CELLULAR SERV - JULY
$47.99
$47.99
AUTO PARTS - JULY
$177.85
$177.85
PARTS
$124.80
$124.80`
WATER SAMPLES
$135.00
$135.00
SS GOLF 1W WAPELLA
$3.84
1818 1/2 BONTIA DR
$11.84
NS KENSINGTON IE RAND RD
$10.14
$25.82
ELEC SUPPLIES - JULY
$28,38
ELEC SUPPLIES - JULY
$87.58
$115.96
PARTS
$21.86
$21.86
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$432.56
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$256.75
$689.31
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
$20.00
MISC EXPENSES
$11.00
$11.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 22
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$175.00
S.85
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$2.00
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$59.65
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$46.59
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$40.00
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
AIR HOSE
$34.00
$358.09
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$30.00
$392.51
$30.00
PROSAFETY
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$417.87
$810.38*
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND CO.
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
$120.30
$220.30
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
OXYGEN CYL
$49.22
$49.22
V & G PRINTERS INC.
NOTICE CARDS
$11.51
$11.51
WIPECO INC
RAGS
$210.00
$210.00
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
REPAIR PARTS
$263.34
$263.34
$275.77
REPAIR PARTS
$258.44
REPAIR PARTS
$543.28
$1,077.44
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$41,893.63
WATER & SEWER FUND
$41,893.63
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
BUHRKE INDUSTRIES, INC.
PARTS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH66-JT-5262-A
$350.00
$350.00
$117.28
BH66-JT-3710-A
$8.57
BH68-JT-7498-A
$21.15
BH66-JT-5266-C
$189.55
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
BH66-JT-0498-A
CLEANING SERV
$21.15
$357.70
$140.00
$140.00
VENDOR
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
RE PAIRS
19 NORTHWEST HWY
ELEC SUPPLIES - JULY
WATER BILL - R R STA
$1,576.01
PAGE 23
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$551.04
$551.04
$7.22
$7.22
$162.55
$162.55
$7.50
$7.50
***TOTAL** $1,576.01
********************************************************************************************************
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE DISPOSAL $123,211.96
REFUSE DISPOSAL $7,750.10 $130,962.06*
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $130,962.06
GENERAL FUND $130,962.06
********************************************************************************************************
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
BURKE AND RYAN
LEGAL SERVICES
$927.00
LEGAL SERVICES
$875.00
$1,802.00
V. J. CENTRACCHIO & SON, INC.
MUSEUM RESTORATION
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
TRKLA, PETTIGREW, ALLEN & PAYN
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
$875.25
$875.25
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
***TOTAL**
$4,177.25
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/31/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $1,500.00 CORPORATE PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV $1,802.25
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 $875.00
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI
MOUNT PROSPECT LIONS CLUB
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
BLDG SUPPLIES - JULY
$149.55
$149.5`
B -JT-75954
$762.47
$762.47
BH67-JT-3858-B
$13.71
BC21-JT-1838-A
$767.80
$781.51
CHRISTMAS DECORATIONS
$2,833.00
$2,833.00
MISC PAINT SUPPLIES
$28.80
$28.80
BUDGET ALLOC-2ND PYMT
$2,500.00
$2,500.00
JULY 4TH FIREWORKS
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$8,555.33
***TOTAL** $8,555.33
$1,180,156.39
DATE RUN, 8/31/89
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 25
TIME'RUN 13.34.18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 8/31/89
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$754,665.01
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$52,079.58
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$53,342.75
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$20,717.87
41
WATER & SEWER FUND
$82,258.40
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$2,100.53
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$61,458.42
51
CAPITAL IMPRV. & RE PL. FUND
$6,121.77
53
CORPORATE PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV
$1,802.25
55
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
$875.00
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$43,586.61
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$35,087.95
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$66,060.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,180,156.39
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, JOSHUA MAYO is a nine year old resident of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, JOSHUA MAYO is well liked by his peers and a good
student; and
WHEREAS, JOSHUA MAYO enjoys those things which boys and girls
his age enjoy the world over such as baseball and skate
boarding; and
WHEREAS, the life of this well-rounded 9 year old took a
tragic turn for the worse when he became the victim of a
serious auto accident; and
WHEREAS, JOSHUA MAYO has had to endure the pain of life
endangering injuries which resulted in a seven week hospital
stay, and is now going through intensive rehabilitative
therapy in order to resume a normal life; and
WHEREAS, throughout this ordeal JOSHUA MAYO has shown respect
and concern for others; and
WHEREAS, JOSHUA MAYO's courage and positive mental outlook on
life has been an inspiration to all citizens of mount
Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
MOunt Prospect do hereby recognize JOSHUA MAYO as a special
resident of the Village of Mount Prospect not only for the
tragedies he has endured but for the example he has set
through his courage and determination.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
P R 0 C L A X A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, We the People did ordain and establish a Constitution for
the United State of America to secure the blessings of liberty for
ourselves and our posterity; and
WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens fully understand the
provisions, principles and meaning of the Constitution so they can
support, preserve and defend it against encroachment; and
WHEREAS, the Bicentennial of the Constitution provides an historic
opportunity for all Americans to learn about and to reflect upon
the rights and privileges of citizenship and its responsibilities;
and
WHEREAS, the President and the Congress of the United States have
designated September 17 as "Citizenship Day" and the week of
September 17 - 23 as "Constitution Week"; and
WHEREAS, the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect enjoy the
blessings of liberty, the guarantees of the Bill of Rights, equal
protection of the law under the constitution, and the freedoms
derived from it.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount
Prospect, in cooperation with the Commission on the Bicentennial
of the United States Constitution, do hereby proclaim September 17,
1989 as CITIZENSHIP DAY and the week of September 17 - 23, 1989 as
CONSTITUTION WEEK, and invite every citizen and institution to join
in the national commemoration.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
MORK KILROY FOU1101TIOn
P.O. Box 777
Santa Fe, Texas 77517
409-925-7771
July 24, 1989
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members:
The tragic death of our son. Mark. and the deaths of fourteen other men who were found
buried in Matamoros, Mexico, has focused the attention of the entire world on the drug
crisis that faces our nation. If we are to survive. we must aggressively attack the enemy
that is destroying us from within.
On September 5, the new national drug policy will be announced. The decisions that will
be made in formulating this new policy are the some of the most critical decisions ever to
be made in the history of our country. We believe that only through a united outcry from
the People of this country will the message that "we have had enough" be delivered to our
leaders,
We are asking that the Mayors and City Councils in each city and town in the United States
adopt a resolution in support of a strong national drug policy. Send the resolution
immediately to: William J. Bennett, Director of National Drug Control Policy
Executive Office of the President
Washington. DC 20500
Illegal drugs are ererrwherr--big cities, small towns, the countryside. It is out of control.
As the leader of your city. please create a great awareness among your citizens of the
urgency and the need for their participation in a demand for a great change. For their
own safety and future, urge the people to also write letters of support to Mr. Bennett.
Many of our young people use illegal drugs casually, thinking that they will not become
addicted. Their attitude toward drugs is positive and the possibility of addiction is not their
concern. We must get the "social users" to quit NOW before they become addicted. With
every addict, there are many innocent victims among the grieving families and friends.
The prevailing attitude is that the present generation is lost and that education of the next
generation is the answer. Education will not work if we allow this casual attitude toward
drugs to continue. The kids will not believe us. The high school dropout rate in Texas is
35% and most dropouts are regular drug users. What is the dropout rate in your state?
Drug rehabilitation Success is less than 20%. One generation of many drug addicts assures
the decline and fall of this nation.
The support of your City will have great impact. We plead with you to help unite the
People of your community and of our country. Only when the people of America
collectively demand a change will a strong drug policy be announced. United we will be
able to start controlling the great drug evil and its countless tragedies.
Respectfully,
dim
r\ -
VM and Helen Kilroy
M. A. R. X.
Akto A Ae$,##asi#1&,r*wwjjAre#j
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE NATIONAL POLICY
AGAINST THE ILLEGAL SALE AND USE OF DRUGS
WHEREAS, the use of illegal drugs has reached the crisis stage
throughout the world; and
WHEREAS, the results of illegal drug use has far reaching
effects not only on the users but on their families, the
community and the nation as a whole; and
WHEREAS, the youth of our community are our hope for the
future and as such they must be made aware of the fact that
use of illegal drugs is not the way of the future; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect supports any and all
efforts to curtail the use of illegal drugs; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect pledges to continue the
ongoing war against drugs through education and law
enforcement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the community as a whole, do
hereby express the support of the Village of Mount Prospect
for the national drug policy and urge the residents of the
Village to become more aware of the problems associated with
illegal drug use and join together in fighting this war on
drugs.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1989.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 13 OF CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 13.106.A(1) of Chapter 13 be deleted in its entirety and
a new Section 13.106.A(1) be inserted, which Section shall be and read as follows:
"Class G License. For issuance to Park Districts only which shall authorize
the licensee to sell and offer for sale at retail for consumption on the
premises specified in such license application, beer and wine only.
Additionally, other alcoholic beverages may be served at special events up
to 30 times per year provided that the Village Manager shall be notified
in writing of each such special event at least 5 days in advance of the
event. This Class G license shall permit only the Park District, its agents
or employees to sell or deliver an alcoholic beverage and shall not permit
other parties using Park District facilities to sell or deliver alcoholic
beverages."
SECRON TWO: That all Ordinances or parts of Ordinances in conflict herewith are
hereby repealed.
SEOIQN THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law,
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
�COMMONLY KNOWN AS X813 MAYA LANE
WHEREAS, Julie M and Jeffrey R. Cesaretti (hereinafter referred to
as Petitioners) have filed an application for variation from
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for
property commonly known as 1813 Maya Lane (hereinafter referred to
as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 78 in Brickman Manor Third Addition Unit No. One,
being a Subdivision in the Southwest Quarter Of Section
24, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third
Principal Meridian, according to Plat thereof registered
in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County,
IllinOi4, on April 10, 1964 as Document Number 2144176
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102-A of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a ten
foot (10') front yard instead of the required thirty feet (301)
required in order to construct a parking pad in the required
front yard; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 39-V-89 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of
July, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the mount Prospect Herald on the 27th day of June, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested and have determined that the same satisfies the
standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14
of the village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that
it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the
variations as specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE; The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
gZ_CJ1,ON TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a
variation from Section 14.1102.a to allow a ten foot (Jol) front
yard rather than the required thirty feet (301), which variation
will permit the construction of a parking pad in the required
front yard, provided that adequate screening in the form of
landscaping be maintained.
91r.TION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all
other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and
regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the
Subject Property.
SECTION FOR: In accordance with the provisions of Section
14-604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
ZBA 39-V-89 - CAF
Page 2 of 2
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
SECTION F„ VE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
MMOMM
PASSED and APPROVED this — day of '1989.
%jux-did L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
-a—I A. Fields
Village Clerk
V)mLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT`
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
DATE:
JULY 19, 1989
SUBJECT:
ST. PAUL SCHOOL RESUBDIVISION
100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET
The applicant is requesting approval of this plat in order to consolidate six lots into one
lot of record. St, Paul Lutheran School is proposing to demolish the existing school
building on the corner of Busse and School Streets and to rebuild this school facility, The
consolidation of the lots on this site is being performed in order to conform to the Zoning
Ordinance, Section 14.101.0:1 of the Ordinance states that it is unlawful to occupy, on more
than one lot, a single main use. This resubdivision plat places the entire St. Paul School
property onto one lot of record, meeting this ordinance requirement. The plat is being
processed in conjunction with the zoning variations and Development Code modifications
for the school,
The Plan Commission heard the applicant's subdivision request on Wednesday, July 19,
1989, and voted to recommend that the resubdivision plat be approved by a vote of 8-0.
Staff had previously reviewed the plat, and had no objections to it.
MES: hg
Approved:
David M, Clements, Director
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS LU SOUTH SCHOOL STREET
WHEREAS, St. Paul Evangelical Lutheran Congregation (hereinafter
referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for variations
from certain provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 100 South School
Street (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) , legally
described as:
Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in Busse's Subdivision being a
Subdivision of Block 7 (except the south 196 feet
thereof) in Busse and Wille's Resubdivision in Mount
Prospect, in the West Half of Section 12, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
also, the south 196 feet of Block 7, Lot "All (except
the South 255 feet) Block 8 in Busse and Wille's
Resubdivision in Mount Prospect in the West Half of
Section 1�, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian,
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Chapter 14 (Zoning
Ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect as follows:
1. Section 14.102.8.4 to allow the existing 1,366 square foot
parsonage building to remain as an accessory structure, rather
than the permitted 120 square feet;
2. Section 14.1102 to allow a floor area ratio of .40% instead
of the permitted .35%;
3. Section 14.1102.E to allow a maximum lot coverage of 54%
instead of the permitted 45%;
4. Section 14.1104.A to allow a thirty foot (300) building height
instead of the permitted twenty-four feet;
5. Section 1102.8.2 to allow a seventeen foot (171) exterior yard
on the west property line instead of the required twenty feet;
6. Section 14.1102.B.2 to allow a zero foot exterior side yard
on the east property line for a parking lot instead of the 20
feet required;
7. Section 14.1102.0 to allow a zero foot rear yard for a parking
lot instead of the required twenty-five feet; and
8. Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a zero foot interior side yard
setback for a parking lot instead of the required ten feet.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 40-V-89 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of July,
1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Prosp-e-Qt H * and
.-grald on the 27th day of June, 1989,
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
a
ZBA 40-V-89
Page 2 of 3
Village of mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards
set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the
Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would
be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as
specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
5_E92J_0N_0&E_.* The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SEQTION MO; The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the
following variations:
1. Section 14-102.B.4 to allow the existing 1,366 square foot
parsonage building to remain as an accessory structure, rather
than the permitted 120 square feet;
2. Section 14-1102 to allow a floor area ratio of .40% instead
of the permitted .35%;
3. Section 14.1102.E to allow a maximum lot coverage of 54%
instead of the permitted 45%;
4. Section 14.1104.A to allow a thirty foot (301) building height
instead of the permitted twenty-four feet;
5. Section 1102.B.2 to allow a seventeen foot (171) exterior yard
on the west property line instead of the required twenty feet;
6. Section 14.1102.B.2 to allow a zero foot exterior side yard
on the east property line for a parking lot instead of the 20
feet required;
7. Section 14.1102.0 to allow a zero foot rear yard for a parking
lot instead of the required twenty-five feet; and
8. Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a zero foot interior side yard
setback for a parking lot instead of the required ten feet.
EEMON THREE' Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable provisions of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) of the
village of Mount Prospect shall remain in full force and effect as
to the Subject Property.
In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
ZBA 40-V-89
Page 3 of 3
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1989.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16 ENTITLED
"DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOW AS 100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET
WHEREAS, St. Paul Evangelical Lutheran Congregation of Mount
Prospect (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has requested
modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village
of Mount for property commonly known as 100 South School Street and
legally described as follows; and
Lots 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 in Busse's Subdivision being a
Subdivision of Block 7 (except the south 196 feet thereof) in
Busse and Wille's Resubdivision in Mount Prospect, in the West
Half of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, also, the south 196 feet of Block
7, Lot "All (except the south 255 feet) "All Block 8 in Busse
and Wille's Resubdivision in Mount Prospect in the West Half
of Section 12, Town 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Mnri-Oian.
and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the following modifications from the Development Code:
1. To construct a carriage walk 2 feet wide within the
public parkways on Busse Avenue and School Street;
2. To allow the existing Commonwealth Edison wood pole street
light in lieu of Village of Mount Prospect lighting
requirements;
3. To delete the requirement for curbing around the existing
parking lot;
4. To retain the existing parking lot for a period of one year
after occupancy of the new school. The parking lot shall then
be reconstructed to Village standards.
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendations
relative to the modifications requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, and the
President and Board of Trustees have determined that the best
interests of the Village would be served in granting the
modifications requested herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That modifications from the Development Code (Chapter
9
St. Paul's School
Chapter 16
Page 2 of 2
16) are hereby granted to the Subject Property as follows:
1. To construct a carriage walk 2 feet wide within the
public parkways on Busse Avenue and School Street;
2. To allow the existing Commonwealth Edison wood pole street
light in lieu of Village of Mount Prospect lighting
requirements;
3. To delete the requirement for curbing around the existing
parking lot;
4. To retain the existing parking lot for a period of one year
after the occupancy of the new school. The parking lot shall
then be reconstructed to Village standards.
SECTION _TFIREE. The modifications granted herein are subject to
construction of a new 2 story school building, as indicated on the
site plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
MEOMI-ONECUR . Except for the modifications from the Development
Code granted herein, all other requirements of said Development
Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
MEQj_IONFIVE- This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
uerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1989.
1-Y-xLLAGE OF MOUNT PROsphr
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNED'..
SUBJECT: ZBA-44-SU-89, ZBA-45-V.89, WILLIAM V. MATTSON
LOCATION: 410 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989
The applicant is requesting a special use to allow a four -car garage and variations to allow
a 980 square foot garage instead of 600 feet, and a 39 foot driveway width at the garage
instead of 21 feet. This case was presented by Mr. Mattson to the Zoning Board at the July
27, 1989 hearing.
Mr. Mattson stated that he wanted to upgrade his home and garage on his 3/4 of an acre
lot. He currently has a substandard garage and attached shed. He felt that it would be
better to build a gn-lzige Large enough to house all of his vehicles and garden equipment,
rather than park cars outside and store garden equipment in a separate shed. The Village
staff stated that their main concern was the rarity of other four -car garages in the Village,
However, it was also stated that this property is 3/4 of an acre large and could
accommodate this larger garage without impacting the neighbors if properly screened with
landscaping,
The Zoning Board of Appeals asked the applicant about the possibility of future subdivision
of this lot. The petitioner satisfied that Board that he had no intention of subdividing this
lot in the future. The Board also told Mr, Mattson that a business would not be allowed
to be operated out of this garage. The Board then voted unanimously (6-0) to approve both
the special use and the variations as noted. There were no neighbors or objectors present
to voice their concerns at this hearing.
PB:hg
Approved:
David M. Clements
1
N
r i
Yu7P
fA:f1Zf
ZtoD+ gyp„ z
t}
� M
� r
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-44-SU-89 and
ZBA-45-V-89
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: July 27, 1989
William and Louise Mattson
410 South Meier Road
July 12, 1989
Special Use per Section 14,1101.C.6 to allow
a four -car garage and a variation from Section
14.102.B.4 to allow a 980 square foot garage
instead of 600 square feet as permitted by Code.
Also a variation from Section 14.116.C, is
requested to allow a 39 foot wide driveway
instead of a 21 foot width normally allowed by
Code.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT: Len Petrucelli
INTERESTED PARTIES: None
William Mattson, 410 South Meier Road, petitioner stated that be wanted to upgrade his
3/4 acre lot, specifically his three -car garage which is currently sub -standard. He felt it
would be better to increase the size of his garage rather than build a shed on his property
which would jeopardize the existing park -like setting and would possibly obstruct the view
of neighboring Craig Court residents. The petitioner's neighbors had no objections to the
proposed improvements.
Paul Bednar, Village of Mount Prospect Planner, stated that the Village's main concern is
that of the rarity of other four -car garages and the precedent that may evolve. Mr. Bednar
also stated that a 3/4 acre lot could accommodate this larger garage without encroaching
into required yards and impacting the neighbors, if properly landscaped.
The Board queried the petitioner on the likelihood of his subdividing the land. The
petitioner satisfied the Board that he had no intentions of subdividing the lot Some
members of the Board had questions whether the petitioner might possibly start another
business in this new garage. The petitioner responded that he had no such interest.
Case No. ZBA-44-SU-89
and ZBA-45-V-$9
Page 2 of 2
Upon a motion by Ms. OWay, seconded, by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved to grant a special
use to allow a four-car garage, as per Section 14.1101.0.6.
Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May
NAYS: None
By a vote of 16-0 the .motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case.
Upon a motion by MS. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, it was moved to grant a variation
from Section 14.102.4.4 to allow a 980 square foot garage instead of 600 square feet, as
permitted by Code, and a variation, from Section 14.11+6.0 to allows a 39 foot wide driveway
instead of 21 foot normally allowed by Code, as indicated can Exhibit #1;
Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May
NAYS: None
By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. VillageBoard action will be required in this case.
Johhn Ratcliffe Jack Step eb M. McNellis
Recording Secretary Recording Secretary
,_.�LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL.:
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS IRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-44-SU-89, ZBA45-V-89, WILLIAM V. MATTSON
LOCATION: 410 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
DATE: JULY 20, 1989
REOVEST
The applicant is requesting a special use to allow a four -car garage as per Section
14.1106.C.6 and a variation from Section 14.102.13.4 to allow a 980 square foot garage
instead of 600 square feet as permitted by Code. Also a variation from Section 14.116.0
is requested to allow a 39 foot wide driveway instead of 21 feet normally allowed by Code.
VILLAGE STAEE C!QMMF
,NTS
Both Engineering and Inspection Services Departments note that a grading plan will be
required. No over -land drainage flow from west to east will be allowed to be altered by
this garage addition. Permits will be required for any construction done on the property.
No other comments were received regarding this case.
PLANNING AND ZONING..COMMENTS
The Mattson's are proposing a large building addition. As part of this plan, they propose
to replace the existing two -car garage *h an attached four -car garage of approximately 980
square feet in area. Also requested as part of this proposal is a driveway width of 30 feet
at the garage rather than the normal 21 foot drive width allowed by Code. The application
states that there are four cars (two collector cars) along with a camping trailer in the
family. The Zoning Ordinance allows for camping trailers on single family lots if housed
in garages. It is the Mattson's desire to garage all of these vehicles.
This parcel is approximately 3/4 of an acre in size and is zoned R-1 Single Family
surrounded by other single family lots. This particular lot is twice the width of some of the
adjacent lots to the north and also is very deep (260 feet). The existing home and garage
are of a modest size (approximately 2,000 square feet). The proposed addition to the
house, along with the new attached four -car garage will be located in back of the existing
house. As indicated on the site plan, there will be a resultant rear yard setback from the
garage to the property line of 125 feet. The garage will be 75 feet from the south property
line and 80 feet from the north property line.
Gil Basnik .. Page 2
ZBA44-SU-99, ZBA45.V.89
July 20, 1989
Our main concern with this proposal is the rarity of other four -car garages in the Village.
Although three -car garages are becoming more common with newer homes, there is only
one other instance of a four -car attached garage being allowed recently.
The garage request, being a special use, does not require hardship, however, the standards
for a special use request must be met. The most important of these standards with respect
to this garage, is the impact it will have on the surrounding properties.
Upon a field inspection, we found a large park -like setting on the back half of this property.
The amount of open land which is available to landscape could help minimize any adverse
impact upon the surrounding properties. With ample space to provide landscape screening,
it is possible to screen off most views of this extra -large garage and driveway from the
adjacent properties. It will be difficult and nearly impossible to see either the driveway or
garage from the street itself. For these reasons, we do not expect a significant impact upon
the neighborhood, if approved.
In summary, the Mattsons are requesting a special use to allow a large four -car garage and
subsequent variations that will be necessary if the special use permit is approved. Our main
concern is the precedent setting that may occur, if approved. The other option of storing
the RV vehicle and/or collector cars off the property still exists. On the other hand, this
lot is approximately 3/4 of an acre in size and can accommodate the proposed additions
if properly screened with landscaping without impacting the neighborhood significantly. The
resultant rear and side yard setbacks will still be in excess of the Code minimum
requirements.
PB:hg
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 410 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
WHEREAS, William V and Louise Mattson (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed a petition for a Special Use with respect
to property commonly !mown as 410 South Meier Road (hereinafter
referred to as the Subi-ect Property); and
Lots 8 in Kaplan -Braun's 2nd Addition to Mount Prospect,
being a Subdivision of the East 300 feet of the North
three-quarters of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of SEction 10, Township
41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a Special Use for the Subject Property,
pursuant to Section 14.1101.C.6, to permit 4 -car garages 980 square
feet in size; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 44 -SU -89) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of July,
1989, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the
Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of July, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendations in favor of the proposed Special Use to the
President and Board of Trustees; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have given further consideration to the requests
herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of
the Village and that the granting of the proposed Special Use would
be in the best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE; The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWQ: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property a Special
Use to permit a 4 -car garage 980 square feet in size.
SECTION THREE: With the exception of the Special Use granted
herein and the variations granted in ordinance No. _, the
Subject Property shall comply with all other applicable Village of
Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations pertaining thereto.
ON FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
ZBA 44 -SU -89
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and Publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989.
ATTEST:
Gerald
Village President
CFa`rolA-�Fiel`ds���
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 410 SOUTH MEIER ROAD
WHEREAS, William V and Louise Mattson (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed a petition for variations with respect to
property commonly known as 410 South Meier Road (hereinafter
referred to as the Subject Properties); and
Lots 8 in Kaplan -Braun's 2nd Addition to Mount Prospect,
being a Subdivision of the East 300 feet of the North
three-quarters of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast
Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of SEction 10, Township
41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.116.0 of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a
driveway width of 39 feet (391) instead of the permitted twenty-
one feet and a variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to permit a garage
980 square feet in size instead of the permitted 600 square feet;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 45-V-89 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
July, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of July, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the village have given further consideration to the variations
requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards
set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the
Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would
be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as
specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE; The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant variations to the Subject Property
to permit a driveway width of thirty-nine feet (391) and a
variation to permit a garage 980 square feet in size.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein and the
Special Use granted by Ordinance No. , all other applicable
Page 45-17-89
Page 2 of 2
Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations shall remain
in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
9-Z9!J-0-14-EOUR. In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
51,-'C_T_IONF1VE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1989.
uerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
'v-i-.LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPT: f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGERS ,
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER..''
SUBJECT: ZBA48-V-89, MARK HOCIN
LOCATION: 1808 CREE LANE
DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989
The applicant is requesting the following three variations from the Zoning Code.
1. A variation to allow an 18 foot wide driveway for a one car garage instead of the
maximum 15 feet.
2. A variation to allow a 7 foot front yard instead of a 30 foot front yard in order
to provide a parking pad for vehicles.
3. A variation to allow a one foot side yard instead of a 6.3 foot side yard for the
same parking pad.
This case was prey-nted to the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 27, 1989. The Village
staff presented alternatives to the proposed parking pad to the Zoning Board. It would be
possible but very difficult to expand the existing garage to a two car garage. It would also
be possible but difficult to construct a new garage in the rear and extend the driveway
around the side of the house. These two options do necessitate variations as well. Staff
also pointed out that similar homes with similar sized garages in this neighborhood, do not
have the same driveway width or parking pad as is proposed here. The maximum driveway
width found in this neighborhood for similar homes is approximately 12 feet. Staff
concluded that if the Zoning Board feels that another parking space should be allowed for
this property, it would be logical to locate in approximately the location proposed.
However, the main question is whether the width should be 18 feet and not 15 feet to meet
Code.
The Board discussed the existing parkway tree and the distance between this tree and the
new proposed driveway. They felt that a 3 foot minimum setback from the property line
would be necessary to both save the parkway tree and to construct a retaining wall to hold
back the steep slope.
The Board then voted to approve this request with the minimum 3 foot side yard by a
unanimous 6-0 vote. Thee were no neighbors or objectors present at this hearing.
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director
�f
OR
Ahlo 4 NOY TO BE used
S"S AM NOT TO at AMMEO, FROM 6"UN42
NO,--AA-20--6--
0, 20
4A0V levAU91 AW
151
Fame ,
fence iSOAATMW�q Z% is4hvv
chain
*7
—
SFT i FUR008 Al
ES
17
LOT 25
R
Part a or wto*V
F&W poli on Un*
ftst" fore Y fBW agg rogply
MALMNG LINES Ak=DM A1.r11"S- 'Me SO
RECOPOED IN TWE .611TIE.S E. .-
'grE,OR
'TIMACT
OmmWW* bot mm vmw %,N*WM
M
M
inch" ow orwi", th~
.01-tv W.M.
r41
We in . I- J4.7.
me. Ills
)
AN UP 25.3* .75.r
irATE OF
Ar;
COMPARE ALL POWTS BEFORE BUWNG BY SAME ANO 4'
ANY (AFFERENCE.
State of 1111"s
County Of Cook
Vft CERTIFIED SURVEY CO. do hereby certify
Surveyed the ab" doWrWW PMWtY and that It
drawn is a cwfW m0moontalion o0f.A�bd ounow
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE,
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-48-V-89
Hearing Date: July 27, 1989
PETITIONER:
Mark Hocin
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1808 Cree Lane
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 12, 1989
REQUEST:
A variation from Section 14.3016 of the Zoning
Code in order to allow an 18 foot driveway
width for a one -car garage instead of 15 feet
as allowed by Code. Also requested is a
variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a 7
foot front yard for the purposes of a parking
pad instead of a 30 foot front yard setback as
required by Code. Also a variation requested
from Section 14,1102.13 to allow a one foot side
yard for the parking pad instead of 6.3 foot side
yard setback as required by Code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:
Len Petrucelli
INTERESTED PARTIES:
None
Mark Hocin (petitioner), 1808 Cree Lane, stated his requests and also noted that he had
spoken with his neighbors and that they did not mind his proceeding with construction of
his wider driveway.
Paul Bednar, Village Planner, noted that in terms of yard variances, you are not allowed
to put a parking pad in a regular front or side yard. He did note however, that to expand
an existing garage would be very difficult. He also noted that it would be difficult, but not
impossible, to put the new garage in the rear yard. Mr. Bednar stated his main concern was
whether another parking space be allowed on this property, given its constraints, and if so,
should the driveway be allowed 18 feet wide rather than 15 feet.
There was some general discussion concerning the close proximity of what would be the
new driveway to an existing tree on a public parkway. The Board discussed approving this
variation with the stipulation that the closest the parking pad would be allowed to the side
Case No. ZBA-48-V-89
Page 2 of 2
be "Wwr"11=10=1111 MeM.- IME * in•
- ,
v. I•C-SWI to Inake sure any concession that need d to save the tree, would
carried Out. The petitioner stated that he would comply wfth this request.
Upon a motion by Mi. Brettrager, seconded ty
Ms. 81wk
#
Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Lannon and O'May
NAYS: Cassidy and Brothers
By a vote of 4-2 the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case
pon,a motion hY Ms. UM* seconded bv Wr. TATmcf. itw7c
Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May
NAYS: None
By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed.
Upon a motion by Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved to enter the case
of the 18 foot driveway width for a one -car garage as Resolution Z-48-89.
Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May
NAYS; None
By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed.
1,7
tep n M. elks
Recording Secretary
atch ekson
R cording Segretary
—.,LAGE OF MOUNT PROW 7
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENA-'
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
GIL BASNK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS c RMAN
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANN
SUBJECT:
ZBA48-V.89, MARK HOCIN
LOCATION:
1808 CREE LANE
DATE:
JULY 20, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a 18 foot wide
driveway for a one -car garage instead of a maximum 15 feet. Also requested is a variation
from Section 14.1102.A to allow a 7 foot front yard in order to provide a parking pad
instead a 30 foot normally required. And finally, a variation from Section 14.1102.13 to
allow a 1 foot side yard for the purposes of the parking pad instead of 6.3 foot side yard
as per Code. Mr. Hocin is proposing to increase the width of the driveway from the
existing 9 feet to that proposed in order to have an additional parking space on his
property.
The Engineering Department notes that the drive apron, as proposed on the site plan, will
not be allowed to extend past Mr. Hocin's property line. A retaining wall will also be
necessary on the edge of this new pavement in order to prevent erosion. They also noted
that no fill shall be placed within 3 feet of the side property line, since the drainage pattern
along this property line cannot be altered. For this reason, the width of the pavement
near the front property line should be decreased. The Inspection Services Department
notes that permits will be required bAfore any construction begins. No other comments
were received from Village staff regarding this case.
PWLNING AND ZONING COMMEM
The Hocin's live in a single family home typical of other homes in this single family
neighborhood. They have a one -car attached garage which is depressed below grade.
There is also a 9 foot wide driveway leading into the garage. Mr. Hocin is requesting to
widen the existing driveway to 18 feet to allow more than two automobiles to be parked in
the driveway over night, Technically, the Code allows a 15 foot wide drive if centered in
front of the one -car garage.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA48-V-89
July 20, 1989
It would be difficult to either expand the size of the garage or build a detached garage in
the rear yard. An expansion of the existing garage would not only require variations to the
side yard setbacks, but also may be impractical cost -wise and require extensive engineering.
The option of converting this existing garage space to living space and building a new
detached garage in the rear yard may be possible, however, it may be very difficult to
extend a new driveway around the side of the house with the grade problems that exist right
now. A widening of the existing driveway in front of the house may be the most practical
way to provide another parking space. However, the question the Board must deal with is
whether another parking space on this property is necessary, and if so, is 18 feet necessary?.
Upon a field inspection of six or seven other similar houses on this same street, we found
none had parking pads similar to that proposed here. Only one other home with a similar
one -car attached depressed garage had a driveway wider than 10 feet at approximately a
13 foot width. The current garage and driveway space on the Hocin's property will permit
at least two and probably three vehicles to park off-street. The petitioner should address
whether or a 15 foot width will help solve his problem. If a variation is granted for the
driveway width and yard setbacks, a hardship must be established.
In summary, the Hocin's don't have many reasonable options other than an expanded
driveway width if they are to provide an additional parking space on their property.
However, the question the Board must answer is whether or not an additional parking space
is necessary and if so, is 1.8 feet necessary? The precedent has not been set for a similar
parking pad in this neighborhood. If approved, the driveway width could not extend over
the property line and should be held back at least 3 feet from the side property lines in
order to allow for proper drainage, and to ensure the survival of the parkway tree.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1808 CREE LANE
WHEREAS, Mark and Barbara Hocin (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from certain
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 1808 Cree Lane
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described
as:
Lot 287 in Brickman Manor 2nd Addition Unit Number 1,
being a subdivision of part of the North West Quarter of
SEction 25, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.A to
allow a seven foot (71) front yard instead of the 30 feet required
and from Section 14.1102.B to permit a three foot (31) side yard
rather than the required 6.3 feet in order to provide for a parking
pad; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 48-V-89 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of
July, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of July 1989, and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and.Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards
set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the
Village Code and the Board of Trustees turther find that it would
be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as
specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102.B to allow a three foot (3-) side yard instead
of the required 6.3 feet and a variation from Section 14.1102.A to
permit a seven foot (71) front yard rather than the required thirty
feet, which variations will permit the construction of a parking
pad.
gEr.TION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
ZBA 48-V-89
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and void unless Permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Ea-rolA. Fi-elds
Village Clerk
,1989.
,,�LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL-ct
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLAN
SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF AND EUCLID
DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989
V_+r a • �*�
Amoco Oil Company had received a rezoning, special use and variations approximately one
year ago to construct a new food mart, self -serve gas station at this comer. After receiving
approval from the Village Board, the Illinois Department of Transportation (I.D.O.T.)
determined that much of this lot is in a floodplain. As a result, Amoco has to provide
detention areas on the property that are closer to the building than allowed, and they also
have a finished floor elevation of their new building that is not high enough above the
floodplain level to meet Code. Amoco recently appeared before the Zoning Board of
Appeals for zoning relief and the Plan Commission for Development Code modifications.
K010RIOLM
The representative for Amoco Oil appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on July
27, 1989 to request a variation from the floodway requirements and also a one-year
extension for the previously granted variations on this property (Ord. #3980). As unusual
as it may seem, the Zoning Board is responsible for reviewing variations from floodway
requirements. The Village requires a finished floor in a building to be 2 feet above a
floodplain level. Amoco's building is proposed to be one foot above this level.
The Village staff feels comfortable with a one foot elevation above floodplain level rather
than two feet since this rule was established mainly for residential. Staff also informed the
Zoning Board that the originally approved landscaping plan had been revised as a result
of the new detention areas on the perimeter. It was staffs recommendation that this
landscaping plan be further revised and approved by staff. The staff also supported the
one-year "tension for the previously approved variations.
The Zoning Board of Appeals had no questions and proceeded to approve all requests
unanimously by a vote of 6-0. There were neighbors of this property present in the
audience, however, no one objected to the request.
John F. Dixon • Page.
August 9, 1989
Representatives of Amoco appeared before the Plan Commission on July 19, 1.989 to
request three Development Code modifications. The first request would allow a 1%
detention basin slope which the Plan Commission recommended for approval by a
unanimous vote of 8-0. The second item would allow a three to one side slope in the
detention basin which the Plan Commission also recommended approving unanimously by
a vote of 8-0 but made their approval subject to review and approval by staff.
Finally, the third Development Code modification would allow the new gas station to be
located within 75 feet of this detention basin. After some discussion among the
Commission members regarding the close proximity of this detention basin to the
neighboring residents to the south, some of the members could not support this request.
The commission voted to recommend approval of this item by a vote of 6-2, however, they
made their vote contingent upon further staff review and written notification of adjacent
property owners. Since this hearing, the Planning and Zoning staff has notified all adjacent
property owners of these Development Code requests.
PB:hg
Approved:
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-49-V-89
Hearing Date: July 27, 1989
PETITIONER:
Amoco Oil Company
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Southwest comer of Wolf and Euclid
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 12, 1989
REQUEST:
A variation from Section 22.806 to allow revised
site plans for the food mart, gas station
conforming to I.D.O.T. floodway requirements,
Also a variation from Section 16.405 of the
Development Code in order to allow a site plan
modifications conforming to I.D.O.T.
requirements and also a variation from Section
14.604.B. to allow for an extension of one year
for the previously granted variations to this
property.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
INTERESTED PARTIES:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Len Petrucelli
RM
John B. Murphey, attorney for Amoco, the petitioner, stated that I.D.O.T. determined that
much of this lot is in a floodplain. The Village requires a finished floor of a building to
be 2 feet above the flood level. Amoco's building is to be 1 foot above this level. He
stated that this rule, as he understands from the Village, is mainly for residential. Mr.
Murphey also stated that construction would not be, able to begin within the one year
allowed for the previously granted variations to this property,
Paul Bednar, Village Planner, stated that the Engineering Department felt that it was
acceptable to have a I foot floor height rather than 2 feet since this was meant primarily
for residences. This separation of 1 foot is from the finished floor to the floodplain level.
Mr. Bednar also mentioned that landscaping could be improved even further than it already
had. He said that if the Board approves the variation for the floor height, they should also
make the landscaping a conditional part of this approval. Mr. Bednar also stated that the
Planning 'Department did not foresee any problems with the approaching expiration date
for the variations to the property. The petitioners' should be allowed an extension due to
abnormal circumstances.
Case No. ZBA49-V-89
Page 2 of 2
Upon motion by Mr. Lannon, seconded by Ms. aMay it, was moved to grant variations
from Section 22.806 to allow revised site plans for the food Smart, gas station conforming
to LD.0,T. floodway requirements, Section 16.405 of the Development Code in order to
allow site plan,modifications conforming to I.D.O.T. requirements, and Section 14.604.B to
allow for an extension of 1 year for the previously granted variations to this property.
Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Lannon, O'May, Cassidy, and Brothers
NAYS: None
By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case.
atcl
Atepph�en,,M. Mc n ac on
i
Recording Secretary !tcl
it ---
*.cording etary
1,&LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C RMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER qeRl_�=
SUBJECT: ZBA49-V-89, AMOCO OIL COMPANY
LOCATION- SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF AND EUCLID
DATE: JULY 20, 1989
REQUES
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 22,806, Water, Sewer and Floodplain
regulations. This Section requires that any new construction have a finished floor at least
2 feet above the floodplain level. The new building's finished floor is proposed to be I foot
above the floodplain level as designated by the Illinois Department of Transportation.
Section 22.809 outlines the procedure for variations from the Floodplain regulations. It
states that the Zoning Board of Appeals is responsible for reviewing such a request. One
other variation is requested from Section 14.604.13 of the Zoning Code which would allow
a one year extension of the previously approved variations for this property. Ordinance No.
3980 was passed September 20, 1988 and expires within one year unless permits are issued.
•
The Village Engineering Department is chiefly responsible for reviewing building plans with
regards to Federal, State and local floodplain regulations. The northeast section of this
property as indicated by the diagonal line cutting across the property on the site
improvement plan has been determined to be within a floodplain by the Illinois Department
of Transportation -Division of Waterways. The high water level of this floodplain is
determined to be 643.4, whereas the proposed finished floor elevation of the new building
is to be 644.4. This one foot difference in elevation does not meet the requirements set
forth under Section 22,806 where a 2 foot height above the ood level i required for I
finished floors. The Engineering Department has reviewed the floodplain elevation on this
property and the proposed building elevation and does not have a problem with the request.
Although the Village of Mount Prospect floodplain regulations require finished floors to be
two feet above floodplain levels, this regulation in their opinion was developed more so for
residential buildings. The Engineering Department also notes that the FEMA regulations
only require a building finished floor to be at or above the level of a 100 year floodplain.
NIPC (the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission) recommends the one foot elevation
above the 100 year floodplain. The Village of Mount Prospect standards are higher than
both of these other agencies. Therefore, the Village Engineering Department feels
comfortable granting a variance from our standards in this instance.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA49-V-89
July 20, 1989
PLANNING API
This "s an unusual request for the Zoning Board of Appeals to be reviewing. As stated
above, Section 22.809 of the Municipal Code requires that variations to the Village
floodplain regulations be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Planning and
Zoning Department has no expertise in reviewing floodplain variations, so we must rely
heavily on the Engineering Department's comments. Since they have no objection to this
request, neither do we.
As a result of a large portion of this site being located in the floodplain, additional
detention basins were required in the perimeter yards. These detention basins are located
on what was originally intended to be perimeter landscaped treatments. The possibility of
these basins being wet from time to time has necessitated a revised landscape plan from
what was originally approved. Although the intent of this revised landscape plan is the
same as the original, it is our opinion that it can be improved. We would suggest that, if
the Board recommended approval of the variation to the floodplain regulations, they
condition such approval upon a landscape plan approved by the staff.
The Plan Commission recently reviewed modifications to the Development Code section
with regards to the slope of the detention basins and the distance from these basins to the
proposed buildingg. It is also worth noting that the Village recently received a copy of a
letter written by thc Cook County Department of Highways to the Amoco Oil project
engineers. This letter conditioned any permit approval on the removal of the east drive on
Euclid Avenue. When this driveway area is removed, it will provide additional frontage
area along Euclid Avenue which could also accommodate more landscaping.
Furthermore, we have no problem with granting the request to allow a one-year extension
to the previously approved variations for this property. Unforseen circumstances, such as
the determination that a large portion of this site was in a floodplain, slowed down the
progress of this new building.
PB:hg
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 1690 EAST EUCLID AVENUE IN MOUNT PROSPECT,
ILLINOIS AND AMENDING ORDILIANCE O. 3980
WHEREAS, AMOCO OIL COMPANY, has filed an application for variations
from specified sections of Chapter 14 (Zoning) and Chapter 22
(Water, Sewer and Flood Plain Regulations) of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect for property commonly known as 1690 East Euclid
Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
The South 175 feet of the North 225 feet of the West
175 feet of the East 225 feet of the East Half of
the Southeast Quarter of Section 26, Township 42
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from section 14.604.E to
permit the variations granted in Ordinance No. 3980 to be extended
for one additional year; and from Section 22.806 to allow a revised
site plan to conform to the Illinois Department of Transportation
floodway requirements;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation request
(designated as ZBA Case No. 49-V-89) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 27th day of July,
1989, pursuant to due and proper legal notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of July, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered the
variation requested and find that it would be in the best interest
of the Village to grant the variation requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 22.806, governing floodplain regulations, to allow a
finished floor elevation of one foot (11) above the floodplain
level rather than the two feet required and an amendment to
Ordinance No. 3980 to extent the effective period of the variations
granted therein for an additional period of one year, September 20,
1990.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all
other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and
regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject
Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
Amoco - ZBA 49-V-89
Page 2 of 2
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins by September 20, 1990.
aECTION EIVE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPnOVEO this - day of 1989.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields -
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16 ENTITLED
"DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOW AS 1690 EAST EUCLID AVENUE
WHEREAS, Amoco Corporation (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has requested modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16)
of the Village of Mount for property commonly known as 1690 East
Euclid Avenue, legally described as follows; and
The South 175 feet of the North 225 feet of the West 175 feet
of the East 225 feet of the East Half of the Southeast Quarter
of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider modifications from Section 16.405 as follows:
1. To permit a dry detention basin floor slope of not less than
one percent (1%); and
2. To permit a building to be fifty feet (501) from a detention
facility rather than the required seventy-five feet (751).
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered the
modificationsrequested and find that it would be in the best
interest of the Village to grant the modifications requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That modifications from the Section 16.405 of the
Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect
are granted as follows:
1. To permit a dry detention basin floor slope of not less than
one percent (1%); and
2. To permit a building to be fifty feet (501) from a detention
facility rather than the required seventy-five feet (751).
SECTION THREE: That except for the modifications granted herein
all other requirements of said Development Code (Chapter 16) of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect shall apply to the subject property.
SECTION FOUR: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
Amoco Modifications
Page 2 of 2
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
KT4W#j*II0kF
'Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
vaLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-47-V-89, EDWIN MUNIZ
LOCATION:
1004 WEST LINCOLN
DATE:
AUGUST 29, 1989
Mr. Muniz initially appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 27, 1989 to
request a 0.5 foot side yard setback in order to allow an already installed walkway along
the side of the house; and a 5'-6" fence height instead of 5 feet. Mr. Muniz presented his
case to the Zoning Board of Appeals stating that he poured a wider concrete walk than
allowed due to the fact that a number of homes in the area had wider walks.
The Village staff stated at the hearing that a quick survey of the neighborhood did not
reveal any expanded patios or side yard walks similar to that on Mr. Muniz's property.
The most pertinent comment from the Village staff dealt with the drainage. The
Engineering Department noted that the drainage flow is from the rear to the front yard
and, with this newly constructed sidewalk located at a higher level than the original grade,
the flow is impeded forcing it onto the neighbor's lot. However, there were no structures
near the lot line next door that would be adversely effected by this surface drainage. The
Inspection Services Department noted that the sidewalk was installed illegally since it was
not constructed according to the permit (36" wide maximum, 4' from the property line).
Neighbors were present at the hearing to voice their objections based on drainage and the
reduced setback.
Village staff had originally verified that the walk was less than 1 foot away from the
property line. Mr. Muniz stated that the walk was 22" from the property line and would
not cause any drainage problems. As a result of the discrepancy, the Zoning Board of
Appeals suggested that this case be continued to August 10, at which time Village staff
would be able to re -visit the site and determine the actual setback from property line and
drainage problem, if any.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
August 29, 1989
On August 10, the Village staff brought the Board up-to-date on the circumstances
surrounding the case. The actual setback of the sidewalk from the property line was
verified at .77 feet and, as constructed, would impede the drainage flow from the rear yard
to the front yard. It was recommended by the Village Engineer that 2 or 3 feet of the
existing sidewalk should be cut back in order to restore a proper drainage swale.
Once again, the neighbors were present to voice their objections to this sidewalk case.
Some members of the Zoning Board of Appeals questioned the actions of Mr. Muniz in
installing a sidewalk width in excess of what was authorized by the building permit. The
Board then voted to approve a Y -Y sidevard setback by a vote of 6-0. The Board also
voted to approve the 5.5 foot high scalloped fence by a vote of 5-1. That decision is final
and needs no further action by the Village Board.
PB:hg
Approved:
i.
15avid M, Clements, Director
ZINC,9ZA1 S/'TEfT
',e +r+ BC• Nf.Aw.S vpg y—T 111” BFEN RTRpMM�O9 LMFS AHD W% MENIS ARE SMOrvN ONLv KINNiF THEY ARE 50 CANMPARE ALL FOINYS e(FOnf Ou N110 S SANF ANO AT ONCE nE l",
n SSE+NC.nNNEr�ENAN n•.5e1+Afi@AF, fl -t d1 SC..1.1MAPS.OTNEFNnSE REFER 10 ,d1n Rf TO KA ASSIRACi O+EFERRNCE
,GR LOAN I nnNSN,IWSN anup5 ron A.oYyl NI FS IM T,
•+sr ru.F'bN
nNS AnE vol m0 Rf ASSr,iuEO rM SCALeaO SNa+nMF d�bamN+•wNM,n1 „•'..," �,S„,"I'".. SIM. 01 W RRn01e t S1
C... 1Y CnoM j
IT. f,]?{ F.)L' NM.. CERTIFIED lUnVEde—j CO da hor—d 1h.t t pl.,
we ,—
+T"
D � me rN• a. r• Ye.,• /E, I f 11 � FNr.wyEn rltd e60.•n dESKNYMe n+nn.+Ir wrd mal 1Ne r1Al ne+Eo+,
— IM!1 m.ve� rT.r ex. e' Qrewn IS a oor reci relnesEn)RnOn ni sA1tl aur.ey /
r+F'F3 iL s/ - [9B9 M.Inn.s1s.r sTArF rr. a7 �,/_
..._...^f�N..._,_._____ m.ve• »..• ex. m• a, m'T r' j'") �'l-n,A,y�'-"'^
M,�.,Ar,.,.�Ll„„�.!M... lZ,, r.5. v, ,:.s• n.1r .:4fj .{y,:+,.....T,.:..........�,..____,_.,..._..._,._
".."`", nEO ILL Lend Sw�
' 5740 NORTH ELSTOI AVENUE CERTIFIC0 SURVEY Cts.
715115
JJ5 JJS
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60x4! �u ■ �" i"i
AX If
fA7f � 775-2B9t
PLAT OF SURVEY
N
LOT L1 IN ALFI HI'S FIRST ADDITION TO MOUNT PROSPECT, BEING A SUBOIVi51ON OF
FART OF TIIE SnUHI
190 fFE1 OF IIIE MES! 4 OF IN NORTHEAST 11 ANO TART OF THESOUTH 990 rEEi OF
;;;E EAST Of "IF
NURIIIMEST 'R OF SECTION 11, TOWNS" IT, 41 NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF IUE IHIRD r0.1
NCI FAL NER IDIAN,
,
nC f OR01 NO 10 INE FLAT THEREOF REGISTERED IN THE OFFICE OF 111'. REGISTRAR OF
TITLES OF COOK COUIITY,
ILL I N015 ON DE C E ME ER J, 1955 AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 1,496,955, IN COOK COUNTY,
ILLTIIOIS,
V E
iauY O FK AN4TN -_ /f+l-if :R1O AYES? / 0 YCIA1uTN
✓ ,/"„•,",,•
�
A.+v,.X� FEM'f O KS '0?n4
Sl'
A
`'"'ARCA Ill O pi,>rY'/ e Off EAST
S
Ex 5T iAd 5i �, Zo
m re ✓ /e LC/ OK —"I, A
%
AR� G� r�
y" Z 07- I
61444 apt MACE �..,,.,",._........., 1 •"' ,✓
I AYS>
,•
LLFC.'Y . A.
,,.—�P W MOF/H / J1G A'!ar
rr
fw
WKF 101AMM a 0"6 ESr
A
A
s'"Ol
„✓
C,„w^'
• / R
,,�'✓
AbM1'tMAA4 ft7 AYsr
Anmf y,�lre e0 «: m—
E4!r .t'7PY� e^+Cs'�/
el<e oaAY'E1 AT
.. .s+rE RA + fr YfC..J�%L✓G�,+VC, 4. ,,.i
'�✓� �
�*
i
I
'•
4011F N6c✓ /'f^JfT•
FEN 4KE "^,•'.,.,. �...��� <O��"...
OTI NE ST
"
,,.
'mSAeE,d�"
N� aY?,les1u
� 9
A
�A���y,
Wo, 6KyF„.
AEC=a9/0
/0i>f,FSr—._..,,,._.,,_
ABN .fCurM
ZINC,9ZA1 S/'TEfT
',e +r+ BC• Nf.Aw.S vpg y—T 111” BFEN RTRpMM�O9 LMFS AHD W% MENIS ARE SMOrvN ONLv KINNiF THEY ARE 50 CANMPARE ALL FOINYS e(FOnf Ou N110 S SANF ANO AT ONCE nE l",
n SSE+NC.nNNEr�ENAN n•.5e1+Afi@AF, fl -t d1 SC..1.1MAPS.OTNEFNnSE REFER 10 ,d1n Rf TO KA ASSIRACi O+EFERRNCE
,GR LOAN I nnNSN,IWSN anup5 ron A.oYyl NI FS IM T,
•+sr ru.F'bN
nNS AnE vol m0 Rf ASSr,iuEO rM SCALeaO SNa+nMF d�bamN+•wNM,n1 „•'..," �,S„,"I'".. SIM. 01 W RRn01e t S1
C... 1Y CnoM j
IT. f,]?{ F.)L' NM.. CERTIFIED lUnVEde—j CO da hor—d 1h.t t pl.,
we ,—
+T"
D � me rN• a. r• Ye.,• /E, I f 11 � FNr.wyEn rltd e60.•n dESKNYMe n+nn.+Ir wrd mal 1Ne r1Al ne+Eo+,
— IM!1 m.ve� rT.r ex. e' Qrewn IS a oor reci relnesEn)RnOn ni sA1tl aur.ey /
r+F'F3 iL s/ - [9B9 M.Inn.s1s.r sTArF rr. a7 �,/_
..._...^f�N..._,_._____ m.ve• »..• ex. m• a, m'T r' j'") �'l-n,A,y�'-"'^
M,�.,Ar,.,.�Ll„„�.!M... lZ,, r.5. v, ,:.s• n.1r .:4fj .{y,:+,.....T,.:..........�,..____,_.,..._..._,._
".."`", nEO ILL Lend Sw�
MINUTE4S OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 47-V-89
Hearing Date: AUGUST 10, 1989
PETITIONER:
Edwin Muniz
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 12, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1004 Lincoln Street
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a
variation from Section
14.1102.8.1 to allow a .5 foot
side yard setback for a
walk/patio area instead of 8
feet required. Also requested
is a variation from Section
21.601. to allow 51 611 maximum
fence height instead of 5
feet.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Ron Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
ABSENT:
Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Joan Robertson
Jim Anderson
The case was continued from the July 27, 1989 Zoning Board
hearing. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, brought the board
up to date on the circumstances surrounding the case. Paul,
along with the Village engineer visited the property and relayed
the village engineers opinion that the side walk should be cut
back at least two to three feet in order to restore a drainage
swale near the property line.
Paul also reviewed building permit records and found that the
inspections set up for two separate Saturday mornings were
canceled by the home owner. The petitioner stated that he
canceled the first inspection but the second was canceled by the
Village because the concrete was scheduled to be poured and there
was not an inspector available.
The Petitioner proceeded to state that recent heavy rain fall had
not produced as much as a 111 puddle of rain on the surrounding
property and saw no other way to better state his case. Joan
Robertson of 1002 Lincoln objected to the patio because of
potential drainage Problems and the possible erection of an
awning or sun roof wfilch�wbuld increase drainage On her property,
possibly causing flooding.
Jim Anderson of 333 N. Central pointed out that in the minutes of
the last hearing stated that applicant informed the Zoning Board
that the walk was 22 inches from the property line. The staff
memo states the walk is .77t from the property line. Mr.
Anderson also sited the possibility of installing a roof over the
patio in support of Mrs. Robertson's objection.
The Board, Gil Basnik in particular, questioned the actions of
Mr. Muniz stating that he had acted beyond the Scope of his
approved permit. Not only did he disregard the approved
dimensions, but also failed to consider how the enlarged patio
would effect his neighbors. Peter Lannon stated that he had
visited the sight after the rain this afternoon and saw no run
off on the neighbors property.
Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant Petitioners request
to allow 31 3" side yard setback. The motion was seconded by
Mr. Brettrager. The Board proceeded to grant the variation from
Section 14.1102.B.1
Upon roll call: Ayes: Basnik, Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy,
Brettrager and 0IMay.
Nays: None
By a vote Of 6-0,,the motion Passed. Village board action wi
be required in this cast. I
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant petitioners
requet sto allow from Section 21.601 allowingsa 51 611 fence.
Jane M. Pietrzykowski objected to the fence tating that it would
abut against a fence she had installed earlier. Because two
adjacent fences are not prohibited in the Zoning ordinance the
Board could not exclude it. Mrs Pietrzykowski was instructed to
file an appeal to the Village Board if the fence height is a
concern.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Basnikp Cassidy and
Brettrager.
Nays: 0IMay.
The Zoning Board is Final in this case
LAichard J. ,.,,nson
Recording z-etary
IL GE OF MOUNT PROSF -r
PL4NWING AND ZONING DEPARTMENt'
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA47-V.89, EDWIN MUNIZ
LOCATION: 1004 WEST LINCOLN
DATE: AUGUST 3, 1989
plysiamto1w
As directed by the Board, the Village Engineering Department and I inspected this walk
to verify the distance from the side property line and the drainage. We found that the
survey, dated April 19, 1989 and presented to you at the hearing, is correct. This survey
shows the edge of the concrete being .77 feet west of the property line. It was also
apparent that a portion of the original concrete, which would have extended over the east
property line, was removed. The Engineer still has concerns with the drainage on this
property. It is his oninion that all of the drainage from the rear of Mr. Muniz' property will
flow into his nt-ig..,)or's Jde yard and flow south to Lincoln Street. The best way to
alleviate this problem is to cut an additional 2 to 3 feet of the concrete walk and restore
the original drainage swale.
I also looked through the building permit files for this particular property to gain some
background on the events that occurred. I found a permit that was issued to Mr. Muniz
which indicated a 3 foot wide walk to be placed 4 foot away from the east property line.
A copy of this permit is attached. I also found records indicating that Mr. Muniz cancelled
two Saturday inspections on two separate occasions.
PB:hg
Eric.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-47-V-89
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: July 27, 1989
Edwin Muniz
1004 West Lincoln
July 12, 1989
A variation from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow
a 0.5 foot side yard setback in order to allow
a patio.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Len Petrucelli
Joan Robertson, 1002 W. Lincoln
J. Pietrzykowski
Edwin Muniz, (petitioner), 1004 West Lincoln stated that he wished to extend his side patio
walk due to the fact that 16 homes in the area currently have wider walks than he had.
He also wished to extend the height of his fence to 5'-5" due to the fact that his dog would
be able to jump over a 4 foot fence.
Paul Bednar, Village Planner, stated that the neighbor to the east, which would be the most
affected neighbor, does not have anything in their 20 foot setback that may be impacted
negatively from the extended concrete. Mr. Bednar also noted that a quick survey of the
neighborhood did not find any expanded patios or side yard walks.
The Engineering and Inspection Services report which Mr. Bednar felt was most pertinent
to this case, showed that drainage flow was from the rear to the front yard. The
constructed sidewalk is located at a higher level than original grade. This would impede
drainage and would cause drainage onto the neighbor's lot. It was also noted that the
sidewalk in question had been installed illegally as it had not been constructed according
to the permit• Therefore, any hardship Mr. Muniz had was self-inflicted. Mr. Bednar
stated that the Village had no problem with Mr. Muniz's fence request.
Case No. ZBA-47-V-89
Page 2 of 2
Ms. Joan Robertson, 1002 West Lincoln, stated that she was the next door neighbor to the
east of Mr. Muniz. She objected to the variation request stating that her main concern was
the drainage problem. Ms. Robertson also mentioned that the size of fence had not caused
a problem in the past with previous owners of dogs, and that the fences in the rest of the
neighborhood are the same height, she wondered why Mr. Muniz could not keep his fence
within the Village Code limit of 5 feet.
J. Pietrzykowski, who is the back yard neighbor of Mr. Muniz, objected to the variation
request due to the height of the fence and the fact that his fence was to be constructed
abutting her fence.
Edwin Muni7, petitioner, was then allowed to rebut. Mr. Muniz stated that he did originally
receive a hermit for a 3 foot sidewalk, however, after noting similar sidewalks in the rest
of the neighborhood and their greater size, he decided to enlarge his sidewalk over the
permitted width of 3 feet. Mr. Muniz stated that he waited for an inspector on the day of
his appointment, when he did not show up, be poured the concrete anyway. He stated that
the walk is about 2T from the property line,
Mr. James T. Anderson, Jr., 333 North Central, debated the distance the sidewalk was from
the property line of Ms. Robertson, the neighbor to the east. He felt the sidewalk was
closer to the property line than Mr. Muniz had mentioned. Mr. Anderson was concerned
about the drainage problems.
After some discussion with Paul Bednar and the petitioner, Mr. Muniz, Mr. Basnik
suggested that this case be continued until August 10, by which time the Village Engineer
will have been able to visit the site where it will be determined the degree of conformity
or non -conformity. The petitioner was in agreement.
Stephen M. Mc-N—ellis JoIto Ratcliffe Jackson
Recording Secretary Recording Sec7tetary
LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPI r
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNK ZONING BOARD7
�7rjZrIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNE
SUBJECT. ZBA47-V-89, EDWIN MUNIZ
LOCATION: 1004 WEST LINCOLN
DATE: JULY 20, 1989
RE019-s-1
The applicant is requesting variations from the Zoning Code including:
1. Section 14.1102.8.1 to allow a 0.5 foot side yard setback for a wide sidewalk/patio
instead of an 8 foot setback required by Code.
2. Section 21.601 to allow a 5.5 foot fence height instead of 5 feet allowed by Code.
Both the Engineering and Inspection Services Departments have serious concerns with
regards to drainage in this side yard. As per the approved drainage plan for this property,
the flow is from the rear yard to the front yard. Because the sidewalk/patio has already
been installed and appears to be at a higher grade than what the original grade was, it is
impeding the drainage patterns. For this reason, the Village staff does not recommend
approval. The Inspection Services Department notes that a permit was issued to install a
3 foot wide concrete sidewalk along the east side of the house. Upon an inspection, it was
found that the "walk" was 10 feet wide at some points. Mr. Muniz was then instructed by
the Village inspectors to remedy the situation. With regards to the fence height, Village
staff had no comments.
Mr. Muniz lives in a ranch home in a single family neighborhood. The neighbor to the east
has a home located approximately 20 feet away from the property line. There are no
patios, decks or walks on the neighbor's property adjacent to Mr. Muniz.
The applicant must state his hardship for the side yard setback request. It is our opinion
that he has created his own hardship by constructing this "walk/patio" area that did not
conform to Code nor to the approved building permit. A brief drive-through the immediate
neighborhood indicated no other similar walk/patios. Because of the concerns expressed
by other Village staff regarding the drainage flow along the property line, we also cannot
support this request.
The fence height variation being minimal as it is does not pose a problem to us. In
summary, the side yard setback request is a problem because 1) the drainage flow has been
redirected by the installation of this concrete and 2) the hardship is self inflicted.
YfLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 31, 1989
SUBJECT: APPEAL OF DECISION BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
CASE ZBA-47.V-89.1004 LINCOLN
On August 24, 1989, the Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed Case No. ZBA-47-V-89. This
case included a fence height variation to permit a 5'-6" fence. The Zoning Board of
Appeals has final authority on fence variations, and approved the request by a 5-1 vote.
An additional variation for a setback variation for a patio must be reviewed by the Village
Board.
The applicant hopes to construct a scalloped fence, 5'-6" in height at the fence pole, and
dropping to a 5' height in the middle of the fence section. Mr. Muniz stated that a
scalloped fence at the permitted 5 foot height, falling to 4'-6" in the middle of the fence
section would not be sufficient to prevent the family dog from jumping the fence.
The Zoning Board of Appeals found that this was a minor fence variation and approved
the request.
Mrs. Jane Pietrzykowski of 1005 West Pendleton and Mrs. Joan Robertson of 1002 W.
Lincoln have filed an appeal objecting to the Zoning Board of Appeals decision. A copy
of these appeal forms are attached.
These residents believe that the 5 foot height should be the maximum allowable, and no
variations should be -pproved. Also, Mrs. Pietrzykowski has a 5 foot fence along her rear
lot line, and she is concerned about a 5'-6" fence being placed against her existing fence.
DMC:hg
STM NOPTN FLlTt7N AVENUE CERTIFIED SURVEY COQ AXI ""IM
cx(cAclo, aI.(aaes (�a(Ae �rj Tnan
TAX I
MAST
N KA1 OF SURVEY`
LOT 17 IN ALPtNt'S fTRS1 ADDITION "D NOMI PRD'SPeCt, B(ING A SIIBD" ISION or PAR, or IIIf SOU1N
RSa r[fI of 1111 NC S1 4 DP IN! FIDRTNEAST V AND PART DP 'Ne s.Ulll 71a r![, of PIF( EAST rl Of Illi
NOR IIMlSt 5{ Of SEt 11011 11, IONN'sNIP hl LIAR rM, RANG( Il, lASI at 111E 11/I40 PRINCIPAL TIER 101 AN,
Fr. C ORD ING IO 111E PLAT 11rtREOf REG ISIERED IN LIR Dif IC! M 111E REGISTRAR OP TI ILES DI COOK MOM,
ILLItgiS ON DECEMBER 2, IS51 AS DOCIMENT NIAAlR i,h1E, SSS, IN COOK COiMI T, ILL INrf 15.
V E
Faux OM1! MNEv---a.1CF J50 AW, ol 01WA M
-V-XCa Clwf 0c5 AOR of
, ., .¢ .1 �.y '�'rt'"B". '""*•, /sT,'W'A'/k' Ori,R.V1N �0+'l UJ7
S 4/
nrWn rxf yr rr,,Cf ao. Mt., ExKf`,ee AS o
lASf Mx yr .KKUYaNG.Y / f L'Q i
Zori7
IN 1
L"NAN LlAlt CE
/TA--'•--^- 1 d'if ;INF
Atltfl,Allr '/.vl Cf 6o PrJi/Jl'
i fAlr "4Z •y[ 2K:f oaArs—
y (1`f e.Vfal
AG7EW / RO •SlNON
".'7I. tai w4 NPM Nt/,NR r,as ^F.Mw., E MEM
WSt MGMroNF.C,tFNr ✓.fro lPtat tn4lt OR
'.*+ i +Ns+cu+a..wo .r NOlroetwv
CD p m ALL tOr+IR utol4 Mdq F Y4F .Flea ONCt `W—1
alT ortFRIP
rffiM
oNs ant Nor io et' -SU D Ino4 SCAINO
r
—ARrR ,FDvtL/s
Sim. d RMdt 'r1
LfJ�
IL, "',
er. rN• M.)R• `
cal-ftoI Cook J as
,ua AAitIss
RI.r i e X
1* Cl"WWO SVWET CO dR ht' PM [Moly IoM Ne nM
Nal
aa.rN• M. r !.Y•
W
'FY'
cnr
Na o" ,f Sr
. sr N • r ei. P
R rt'
E1s4n N R MMr iMRSRndMkMr Ri PWRI tmr.et
Af
AI»
L}.1,:,� -h..
`^ASW'[ 01417 A7 0i MLtr'
rm. rr ."I -E!,'1
TIED ILL LPW Sur.Ryc•
/ •' ✓ J/ 0/T ! L'1T�4✓7
/
.'
.s`"ayuCd4N slr �r5r
' .PES/OENCE r�'
„t"i / rrr Alf!
LOC a r NFe✓ /'•L"A
GG Wz uR: W.OR
!ox
/0.77 HESr
AesneE�7T' �
A41 s>zuesv�'
cx sr 'a" AIV to'
L�C1.
Afc=r710'
ATE
n,,q�.T•
�'fwell o.i EAST
t ler jw-//
x"72' ewPa a
ZNrlozA/
s r
".'7I. tai w4 NPM Nt/,NR r,as ^F.Mw., E MEM
WSt MGMroNF.C,tFNr ✓.fro lPtat tn4lt OR
'.*+ i +Ns+cu+a..wo .r NOlroetwv
RORARIa IFRR Y4 EAeEFRNTa AIR 4gFtll dl 1RFOR 1MRt ARE so
nEC1XRNOM NI[F4Pe, OlFRRVASE trfAMYD4IRFED Oa ARR1RKi
CD p m ALL tOr+IR utol4 Mdq F Y4F .Flea ONCt `W—1
alT ortFRIP
rffiM
oNs ant Nor io et' -SU D Ino4 SCAINO
.. '"•,,
Sim. d RMdt 'r1
IL, "',
er. rN• M.)R• `
cal-ftoI Cook J as
i
D. S ,�
RI.r i e X
1* Cl"WWO SVWET CO dR ht' PM [Moly IoM Ne nM
Nal
aa.rN• M. r !.Y•
W
'FY'
Fur M'nPnly F+rW ilul RNr WRI nerRD„
. sr N • r ei. P
R rt'
E1s4n N R MMr iMRSRndMkMr Ri PWRI tmr.et
Af
n.»• a.l• n.Fr r't RtINRwt b�
L}.1,:,� -h..
rm. rr ."I -E!,'1
TIED ILL LPW Sur.Ryc•
OFFICE USE -0-N'-L-YV"--
CASE NO: ZBA- AppPP
.
V.B. H HEARING DATE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES
APPLICATION FOR ZBA APPEAL
1. Applicant fiz:-7�?z_y/�/, AIZ- M
2. Address -.,,—/,Oe-- 41 144Etlyol-cl,,v
3. Phone Number (During 9 a.m.- 5 p.m. Mon. thru Fri.) c2-1--5--
4. Property Owner
IlKime �and Address- 7Idif fferent t�hanab�ove)
5. LOCATION OR ADDRESS OF SUBJECT Pg, PEP:
6. Real Estate Index #:
7. Give a statement listing your reasons and justification for your appeal:
A
,;_ . ..... W4,T 4- Afy, 7,*,c
7 - mi>c4,4.0h 0 4,
4E/ Z ON -, —41
Z
4i6f 0 7' ,,*STir�E'
-b C
FD
C7-
4
K/ ,,9 -s Weo 4'(S /,v 7-1
-7-,ff- .5-,- /,
8. List by section number and brief description the section(s) of the Mount Prospect Ordinance that are
in contention.
Sec.
See. 14.
If applicant is not the
0i property, then Ol
the
WNER,
MUST ca -sign the
e ovmer M=
application e
Date:
APP—LIC—ANT—(ITdifferent than —above)
`
'
"+�^^~ "^^ ^=4W L
IDLEASE PRINT OR
OLALIK 114K
TYPE
_
CASE 0O.`2 47 �~
V,8 -HEADING DATE
V31LAGE�OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE
BOARD OFTRUSTEES
APPLICATION FOR ZBA APPEAL
I.
Applicant
Joan Robertson
2.
&86ceae
1002 W. Lincoln` Mt.
Prospect, IL. 60050 �--
3^
Phone 0mobec
(During 9 a.m.- 5
p.m. Moo, thru Fri^)Nk.Ph.# 498-8511 (8AM to
4.
Property Owner
----'
5.
LOCATION OR ADDRESS
OF SUBJECT
PROPERTY:
1004 W. Lincoln, Mt. Prospect, I|. 60056
6. Real Estate Index #:
7. Give a statement listing your reasons and justification for your
Edwin Muniz, owner of the subject property, wishes to build a fence 5 feet 6 inches
high on all sides of his property. I object to having a fence built along side my
property which is 'ut i,, keeping to the Villabe Code of 5 feet in height.
This proposed fence would extend 6 inches above the already installed fences on the
Nest and North sides of his property. At the Zoning Board Meeting of July 27th,
8. List by section number and brief description the section(s) of the
Mount Prospect Ordinance that are in contention.
Sec. 14. Section 21.501
Sec. 14.
Maximum fence height of 5 feet.
If applicant is the
owner of the property, then pwNER; FARTNER IN TITEE, CORPORATE
the owner MUST co-sign the OFFICER, BENEFICIARY OF TRUST (Strike
application out all but applicable designation)
Dat
4
�VVLICBT (It different than above)
-,dLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE&
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER'
SUBJECT: ZBA-51-V-89, AIROOM, INC./MR. & MRS. SHEMORSKE
LOCATION: 128 S. WAVERLY
DATE: AUGUST 29, 1989
Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske are requesting a variation to allow a Y-6" side yard setback instead
of 6.5 foot in order to expand the attached garage. Dick Wasserberg of Airoom, Inc.
represented the homeowners in this case at a August 10, 1989 Zoning Board of Appeals
meeting, He stated that the owners wanted more storage space and an extra parking stall
in the garage. There is no other way to put a two -car garage on this property other than
to expand the existing garage. He presented a number of letters from surrounding
neighbors supporting this request and also produced pictures of homes in the area with
similar two -car garages.
Village staff presented their opinion that the applicant's proposed addition is the most
logical alternative for providing additional parking, if more than a one -car garage is
necessary. They also pointed out that there was no evidence of similar side yard variances
in the neighborhood. Staff also noted that Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske agreed to remove an
existing metal shed that is currently located to the rear of the house.
After a brief discussion, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously, 6-0, to approve
this request conditioned upon the removal of the existing metal shed. There were no
neighbors or objectors present to voice their concerns in regards to this case.
PB:hg
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director
,ate
f'�
_ 'C✓
t
i
�t11tq" W�rf
/Ss7►JY�
f�t�hiRt.-E=
'
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 51-V-89 Hearing Date: August 10, 1989
PETITIONER:
Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 12, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
128 South Waverly
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting
variation from Section
14-1102.B.1 to allow a 31 S'+
side yard instead of 6' 61,
feet in order to expand the
attached garage.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chair -man
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
ABSENT:
Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
None
Dick Wasserburg of Airoom Inc., distributed documents and
Pictures in order to explain the petitioners case. Neighbors to
the north South and several across the street reviewed the
petitioners request. The signatures of these neighbors were
included on a letter stating their support of the request.
He went on to state that 9 homes in the area currently that have
two car garages. He produced Pictures of home which will be most
affected by the addition. The north elevation of this home has
only one window in the basement. The home owner had no
objections to the garage according to Mr. Wasserburg. Other
neighbors felt that the petitioners addition would improve the
property value of the home. Mr. Wasserburg stated that upon
evaluation of the Village recommendations, that although
reasonable, cost and aesthetic issues would not warrant following
them.
John Jackson, Intern Planner for the Village of mount prospect,
evidence of similar side yard d
V
Sited the existing regulations regarding o
the property. He sa n
variances in the neighborhoo. The
staff feels that the Petitioners addition is the most logical
alternative for •providing additional parking if the board is of
the Opinion that a I car garage is a hardship. The Shemorske's
agreed to remove an existing metal shed that currently is located
less than 10' from the house.
Gil Basnik requested a motion to grant petitioners proposal for
variation of Section 14.1102.B.1. to allow a'3' 61' side yard
instead of 60 6" in order to expand the attached garage
conditioned with the removal of the existing meta, shed:. Moved
by O"Ma;Y, seconded by Brettrager.
Upon roll call: AYES: Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager,
O'May and Basnik.
By a vote of `6-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will
be required in this ease.
ichardJ �hn=
Recording Secretary
V_AAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL-4
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: JOHN R. JACKSON, INTERN
SUBJECT- ZBA-51-V.89, AIROOM, INC./MR, & MRS. SHEMORSKE
LOCATION: 128 S. WAVERLY
DATE: AUGUST 3, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 3'-6" side yard
setback instead of 6.5 foot in order to construct a garage/living area addition.
)I,LLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Both Engineering and Inspection Services Departments note that the drainage patterns
along the north property line must not be altered. The Inspection Services Department
also noted that the ,!ar- -ubmitted with the zoning application do not meet all Codes,
specifically, the Fire Prevention Code. Building plans must be submitted for review and
approval before building permits are issued. Building permits will be required prior to any
construction. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case.
This property is located at mid -block on South Waverly Avenue between Busse Avenue
and Cleven. Other homes on this block share similar lot sizes and configuration as well
as similar building layouts. The residents are located in an R-1 Single Family District
which requires a 30 foot front yard and 6 1/2 foot side yards on each side. A drive through
the neighborhood revealed no apparent evidence that other residents bad sought relief from
required setbacks.
Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske, represented by Dick Wasserberg of Airoom, Inc., presently have
a home with an attached one -car garage. They are now proposing to build a garage/living
area addition that would increase the amount of storage available.
Along with the expansion of the garage space, would be an addition of living space at the
rear of the garage. The proposed addition would extend 6'-6" to the north of the existing
garage putting it 3-8" from the property line. The current front yard would in no way be
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-51-V-89
August 3, 1989
altered. However, a setback variation from the side property line is required. The current
setback from the existing one -car garage is 10'-3", whereby, the new proposed setback from
the two -car garage is 3'-8". There is an approximate setback of 8'-6" to this property line
from 126 S. Waverly, which is the neighbor to the north.
Mr. & Mrs. Shemorske have proposed the new addition in a manner that is in keeping
with the character of their home as well as neighboring homes. In our opinion, if the
Board is to allow the addition to accommodate a two -car garage, this is the most logical
and feasible location for the addition. However, alternatives do exist. One possibility, if
the applicants merely wish to increase their storage space, would be to extend the existing
garage Y-8" instead of the requested 6-6", this would allow the garage to conform to the
required 6-6" side yard setback. A second option is to construct a narrow driveway past
the existing garage to a detached garage in the rear yard. The current setback from the
property line is 10'-3" and would allow such a driveway to be constructed. Drawbacks to
both of these alternatives include altered building character, increased lot coverage, and
added building expense.
The neighboring property to the north will be most affected by this proposal, although
slightly. Currently, the southern side of the neighbor's home that faces the subject property
has only one basement window. The Shemorske's have also agreed to remove the existing
metal shed located in their rear yard. The applicant should address the hardship suffered
if the 6'-5" setback ->Iqui-e,nent is met.
In summary, if the applicant is allowed to have additional storage anywhere on the property,
this is the most logical location. By the character of the addition, the impact on the
neighborhood is minimal. The separation between the garage/living space and 126 South
Waverly will be approximately 12 feet. The other options available are to reduce the
addition so that it would extend 3'-8" instead of the proposed 6'-6", maintaining the required
setback, or building a detached garage in the rear of the property with the driveway in the
sideyard setback. In order for a variance to be granted, the applicant must satisfy the
Board that sufficient hardship does exist in this case.
ME
Approved:
m
5—1
vid M. Clements, Director
_,LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL_�t
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER I
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEW_'_P'__��41.,
SUBJECT: ZBA-53-V-89, DONALD DZIEDZIC
LOCATION: 103 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
DATE: AUGUST 31, 1989
Mr. Dziedzic appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 24 to request the
following:
1. A 16 1/2 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage. Maximum driveway width is
15 feet.
2. A zero foot front yard in order to construct a parking pad. A 30 foot front yard
is required.
3. A 14.5" side yard for the parking pad. A 5 foot side yard is required.
Mr. Dziedzic stated that he currently has a one -car garage and therefore, it is a problem
parking three cars ,,)ff of :he street. He currently has two cars with plans for a third.
Village staff informed the Board that if another parking space were to be located on this
property, this proposed area would be the most logical and possibly the only one that is
feasible. However, staff recommended that a 3 foot setback from the property line be
maintained.
Mr. Basnik introduced several letters from neighbors objecting to this proposal. Mr. Morris,
of 101 South Edward, requested that the variation be denied or modified with a greater
setback from the property line. Mr. Dziedzic offered to increase the setback from the side
property line to 32 1/2 inches. It was the consensus of the Board that this compromise was
reasonable. They then voted to approve the 16 1/2 foot wide driveway by a unanimous
vote of 6-0. The zero foot front yard and 32 1/2 inct side yard for a parking pad was then
voted on and was passed by a vote of 5-1. Mr. Lannon cast the dissenting vote due to his
disagreement with the interpretation being applied to this case. It should be noted that
the staffs interpretation over time has been that a parking pad in a required yard, requires
a variation, yet a driveway to a detached garage which encroaches the side yard, does not
require a variation.
Approved:
David M. Clements,Director
klU SS d5 Av------, .
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 53-V-89
Hearing Date: August 24, 1989
PETITIONER:
Donald and Elaine Dziedzic
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 9, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
103 South Edward Street
REQUEST:
Variations from Section 14.3016 to
allow a 16k' driveway, Section
14.1102-A to allow a zero foot front
yard for a parking pad, and Section
14-1102.B to allow a 14k" side yard
for a parking pad.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli (8:15 p.m.)
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTEREz,TED:
George Morris
Carl Maas
Barbara Paulus
Michael DeShore
Mr. Donald Dziedzic, 103 South Edward, Mount Prospect, Petitioner,
stated he would like to widen his driveway in order to allow parking
for the four licensed drivers in his family. There is currently a one
car garage and three cars cannot be parked on the drive and parking is
not allowed in the street.
Mr. Richard Johnson, Intern Planner for the Village, indicated that
the Petitioner owns a single family home with a one -car attached
garage with a 9' wide driveway. The request is to widen the driveway
to 16,1 to accommodate an additional parked vehicle. The garage is
currently 6.5 feet from the north property line. The alternatives to
this request are limited due to area and side yard space. The
proposed plan seems to be the most practical. Precedent has been set
within the neighborhood with Mr. Dziedzic recording approximately 12
other similar situations. It was noted that the neighbor to the north
does not agree with the 14�1 side yard.
2BA 53-V-$9
Page Two
Mr. Basnik introduced several letters from neighbors objecting to
this proposal. They are from: Mr. Hollis, 102 S. George; Mr. Morris,
101 S. Edward; Mr. Van Dyke, 22 S. Edward, Mr. McGillicat, 105 S.
George; and Mrs. Seegersall, 100 S. George.
Mr. George Morris, 101 South Edward, neighbor to the north, urged that
the variation be denied or significantly modified prior to approval.
Mr. Morris suggested that Cade be followed as the proposed plan would
be unsightly and out of character with the neighborhood. The
objection is to all the widening taking place to the north and
encroaching to within 1' of his property line directly beneath his
bedroom window.
Mr. Carl Maas, 117 South Edward Street, Mount Prospect, agreed with
all letters of objection indicating that it will be a long-lasting
solution to a short-term problem.
Mr. Barbara Paulus, 102 South George Street, stated her objection to
this proposal. She had solved a similar situation of too many cars by
renting a garage in the neighborhood.
Mr. IMichael DeShore, 100 South Edward, voiced his objection to the
proposal.
Two letters of approval from neighbors directly across the street were
presented to the Board. Mr. Dziedzic explained that he currently has
two cars with four drivers, but expects to add another car.
Mr. Lannon stated that this case is an over -application of zoning
laws. Zoning Code does allow for drives in side yards. Side yards
are measured from the applicable lot line to the building, a driveway
dares not constitute a building or a structure. The driveway does not
meet the Village's definition of a structure or building which are
specifically prohibited in required setbacks in yards.
Mr. Bednar stated that the drive is not what is being located in the
side yard. A parting pad will be located there which has been
interpreted as a structure. When parking a car on a pad, it is
different then just having an access drive from the garage to the
street.
Mr. Lannon read the Zoning definition for structure as follows* "any
construction or any production or piece of work artificially 'built up
or composed of parts joined together in some definite manner." Mr.
Lannon argued that a parking pad does not meet the common definition
for a structure nor does it meet the Zoning definition for structure.
Mr. Dziedzic offered to bring his driveway in lk, from the proposal.
Setback will now be 21$'k" from the lot line.
ZBA CASE 53-V-89
Page Three
It was the consensus of the Board that Mr. Dziedzic's offer was
reasonable. The proposal will now allow for almost 31 of side yard.
Mr. Brettrager suggested that the 1�1 taken from the north side be
allowed on the south side of the drive in order to give the Petitioner
a useable driveway. The Board approved allowing a 321, setback from
the north lot line and at the option of the Petitioner, allowing the
11-21 to be added to the south side of the drive. Mr. Basnik noted the
hardship of the Petitioner in having only a one -car garage.
Mr. Lannon, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant a variation
from Section 14.3016 to allow a 16k, driveway instead of 151 normally
allowed for one car garages as shown on Petitioner's amended Exhibit
#1, provided it is done in conformance with Village specifications.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager
O'May, Basnik
Nayes: None
By a vote of 6-0, the motion for the driveway width passed. The
Zoning Board is final on this portion.
Mr. Petrucelli, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to enter this case
as Z-53-89.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager,
O'May, Basnik
Nayes: None
Upon motion by Ms. O'May and seconded by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved
to grant a variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot front
yard for a parking pad instead of 30 feet and from Section 14.1102.B
to allow a 32k inch side yard for a parking pad instead of 5 feet
normally required by Code as shown in Petitioner's Exhibit #1.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brettrager,
O'May, Basnik
Nayes: Lannon
By a vote of 5-1, the motion passed. Village Board action will be
required for this section.
Mr. Lannon indicated his no vote was due to his disagreement with the
interpretation being applied in this case with respect to parking pads
in side yards and front yards.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
WLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: RICHARD J. JOHNSON, PLANNING INTERN
SUBJECT: ZBA-53-V.89, DONALD DZIEDZIC
LOCATION: 103 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
DATE: AUGUST 17, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting variations from:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 16 1/2 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot front yard in order to construct a parking
pad.
3. Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 14.5" side yard for the parking pad.
VILLAGE STAFF -_
QV,Nl,FNTS
The Engineering Division cautions that surface drainage must not be affected by the
proposed parking pad. A 3 foot setback from the property line is recommended to allow
for drainage. They also suggest installing the structure at the existing elevation. No
additional comments or objections were received from the Village staff.
PL—ANNING AND ZONING ,COMMENp
The Dziedzic's live in a single family home similar to other homes in the neighborhood.
There is a one -car attached garage which is at grade. There is also a 9 foot wide driveway
leading into the garage. Mr. Dziedzic is requesting to widen the existing driveway to 16 1/2
feet to accommodate an additional parked automub.'Ie. Technically, the Code allows a 15
foot wide drive, if centered in front of a one -car garage. Presently, the one -car attached
garage is 6.5 feet from the north property line.
If the Dziedzic's require additional parking, the staff feels their alternatives are limited
due to:
1. Limited area for garage expansion/reconstruction
2. Limited side yard required for driveway access
Gil Basnik - Page 2
August 17, 1989
ZBA-53-V-89
Widening of the existing driveway in front of the house may be the most practical way to
provide an additional parking space. The question the Board must address is whether an
additional space is warranted and if so, should it be placed 14.5" from the north property
line.
The neighbor to the north maintains landscaping right to the property line. A separation
of a little more than I foot between this landscaping and the new pavement will probably
not be adequate to ensure the health of the neighbor's landscaping.
Upon a field inspection of similar homes in the neighborhood, we found none had parking
pads similar to that proposed here. Only one, possibly two other homes, had driveways
wider than 12 feet. The current garage and driveway space on the described property will
permit at least two vehicles to park off-street. The petitioner should address whether a 15
foot width will help solve his problem. If a variation is granted for the driveway width and
setbacks, a hardship must be established.
In summary, the Dziedzic's don't have many reasonable alternatives other than an expanded
driveway width, if they are to provide additional parking on their property. However, the
question the Board must answer is whether or not an additional parking space is necessary
and if so, how close should it be to the north property line. The precendent has not been
set for a similar parking pad in this neighborhood. We would recommend a 3 foot
minimum setback from the north property line if the Board considers approval.
RJJ:hg
Approved:
nb
ffa-;v!d M. -Clements, Director
LLAG E OF MOUNT PROsniz.,r
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-55-V.89, FRANK RUCCI
LOCATION:
1707 MYRTLE DRIVE
DATE:
AUGUST 29, 1989
The applicant is requesting a variation to allow a driveway width of 27.5 feet and a 5.75
foot separation between a new patio enclosure and the detached garage. The maximum
permitted driveway width is 21 feet and a 10 foot separation is required between structures,
Mr. Rucci presented his case before the Zoning Board of Appeals on August 24, 1989.
He stated that the patio enclosure was just recently completed, A permit was issued for
the patio enclosure by the Village but the survey did not show the detached garage.
Therefore, the required separation between structures was not an issue at permit approval.
Because it is already built, Mr. Rucci needs this variation in order to keep it in this
location.
Village staff had no major problem with this request, however, the Inspection Services
Department requested the installation of Type X drywall in the garage for fire prevention,
Mr. Rucci asked the Zoning Board not to require the extra drywall in his already existing
garage and the Zoning Board of Appeals concurred with his request.
A driveway width of 27.5 feet was also requested in order to replace sections of the existing
pavement. The Zoning Board had no objection to this request.
The Board voted 5-1 to recommend approval for both requests with no conditions attached.
Mr. Brettrager cast the one dissenting vote since he was of the opinion that the Class X
drywall should be required as a condition of the building separation variation.
There were no neighbors or objectors present to voice their concerns for this case.
PB:hg
Approved:
�12
David MXlements, Director
N , IJ RVEY "LAT
T
BA R SURVEYIN ► EL. NO. 956.122
2045 S. ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD.
SUITE 108•A
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, IL 60005
Lot 16 in Colonial Heights, First Addition, a Subdivision of part of Lots 5, 6 and 7
In Owner's Division, being a Subdivision of the Southeast quarter (except the West half
of the Southwest quarter thereof) of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, In Cook County, Illinois.
�«,:. r'....
d q:
r
,✓� 4�' is ", ..
j r
y \ 0L
9"a�e Ar r . `.PIP olit
y AS`'`E.
rA.l. AO
0
m'.
Order No. 8965DOF �� � grate of IIIIrroU '
Pale J+ne 21
"t"*� <<" su CauntY of Cook as.
1�g9 ga ',� "
c
Ordered:
dered 8y Frank Rucei s . .wKWalter H. Sauer
T�M. astral in % `" a Req.
0, Q } O a r Ill' Land Surveyor 00 hereby cenity, that a Survey of
**,nA the above described property naS been made under
Scale t Inch o a!d feet. yy',r,.?w,.+ '"�a."` my supemislon and that the plat hareon drawn is a
Distances are shown In feet and decimal parts thersor. *,,"'9 I.Apb,q',+""5 correct representat;on of said Surrey correcteo to a
Compare at.. points barons bWldlnq and at once rayon any difference. "'�""" temperature of 62• Fahrenheit.
Easements and building lines shown per recorded subdivision Pare. Myr —
Rarer to Dead. Tike Polley and local Zoning nquirementa nor adfebnat June 21, 1989
.. building lines and easement restrictions. REO. ILL. LAND SURVEYOR
NO. 1910
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 55-V-89
Hearing Date: August 24, 1989
PETITIONER:
Frank Rucci
PUBLICATION DATE:
August 9, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1707 Myrtle Drive
REQUEST:
Variations from Section 14.102.B to
allow a patio enclosure to remain
5.75 feet from the detached garage
and from Section 14-3016 to allow an
existing 27.75 foot driveway width.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gil Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTER-.3,rEjD,
None
Mr. Frank Rucci, 1707 Myrtle Drive, Mount Prospect, Petitioner, stated
that a variation is required for the new patio enclosure since an old
plat of survey had been submitted and the contractor built the
structure too close, allowing a 5.75 foot separation between the patio
enclosure and the garage instead of 10 feet.
The second variation will be required in order to replace a cracked
driveway with an attached patio. The patio, which has existed for 26
years, is counted as part of the drive creating a 27.75 foot driveway
width instead of the 21 feet allowed by Code.
Mr. Rucci requested that the storage shed be allowed to remain as it
exists in the rear yard easement. No utilities are located below
ground, just utility lines overhead. No objections have been voiced
by neighbors and the building is made of wood and cannot easily be
moved.
Mr. Rucci also requested that an Inspector check his garage walls to
see if the 5/8" drywall is really necessary. The walls consist of
plaster board with foil lining, then old siding which was then resided
over.
ZBA 55-V-89
Page Two
Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, reiterated the variations
needed for the driveway/patio and the Patio enclosure. He noted that
the 10, separation between structures is for fire safety reasons in
order to prevent the spread of fire from one structure to another.
The 5/81, type X drywall is a standard request by the Inspect�ion
Services Department for this reason.
The driveway, in order to comply with Code requirements, would need to
have a 6 foot wide section of concrete removed between the house and
the usable driveway space. No negative impact is anticipated should
it be allowed to remain the way it currently exists.
Mr. Rucci again questioned the necessity of the drywall installation
indicating the amount of money currently being spent for this project.
Discussion ansued regarding drywa,11 installation, noting that it is an
Inspector's standard recommendation specifically for the purpose of
fire prevention. Chairman Basnik stated that the Petitioner has been
advised of the drywall installation and the risk will be his if he
chooses not to comply. A motion was formulated eliminating the
drywall stipulation.
Upon motion by Mr. Petrucelli, seconded by Mr. Lannon, it was moved to
grant the variations from Section 14.102.B to allow a patio enclosure
to remain 5.75 feet from the detached garage instead of 10 feet
normally required as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1 and #2 and from
Section 14.3016 to allow an existing 27.75 foot driveway width instead
of 21 feet normally allowed by Code as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit
#I.
W
Upon roll call: AyeEr: Petrucelli, Lannon, Cassidy, 01may, Basnik
Nayes: Brettrager
By a vote Of 5-1, the motion passed. Mr. Brettrager stated that his
no vote 'Was based on the Fire Departmentys recommendation not being
included in the motion. Village Board action will be required for
both requests.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
-v-jLLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C RMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAJ;, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-55-V-89, FRANK RUCCI
LOCATION: 1707 MYRTLE DRIVE
DATE: AUGUST 17, 1989
The applicant is requesting avariation from Section 14.3016 for a driveway width of 27.75'
at the garage door instead of 21 feet as normally allowed. Also requested is a variation
from Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a 5.75 foot separation between a patio enclosure and the
detached garage. A 10 foot separation is normally required.
The Inspection Services Department notes that a permit was issued for the construction of
the patio enclosure, however, approval was based upon the plat of survey submitted. The
survey submitted was incorrect in that the detached garage was not shown. When an
inspector made a building inspection of the enclosure, he noted that the separation between
garage and enclosure did not meet Code. Mr. Rucci was then directed to obtain a variance.
The Inspection Services Department notes that the interior of the existing garage should
be reinforced with 5/8" type X drywall, if this variance is approved. This will help the fire
rating of the structure if the required 10 foot separation is reduced. The Engineering
Department noted that the existing shed at the rear of the property should be moved out
of the rear yard easement at this time.
The Rucci's live on a standard size lot in an established single family neighborhood. They
are proposing to replace a part of their concrete driveva., Nbich at the present time is a
combined drive and patio area at 27 1/2 feet in width. 'They also had a patio enclosure
(225 square feet) recently completed which is just under 6 feet away from their detached
garage. As indicated above, a permit was issued for a patio enclosure based upon incorrect
information supplied by the petitioner's builder.
The major reason for the Code requirement of a 10 foot separation between structures is
for fire safety. Neither the Fire Department nor Inspection Services Department have an
objection to this request if approval is conditioned upon the requirement of installation of
type X drywall in the garage. Planning and Zoning concurs with this opinion. We expect
no adverse impact upon the neighborhood as a result of this variation.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
August 17, 1989
ZBA-55-V-89
Upon a field inspection of the property, we found the existing 27.5" driveway also being
used as patio space by the Rucci's. It is for this reason that a wider width than 21 feet is
proposed. The Rucci's have had this situation for a number of years and would like to
continue to use the drive as a patio area also, To meet the Code allowances for driveway
widths, an approximate 6 foot wide section of concrete would have to be removed between
the house and the usable driveway space. It is our opinion that the resultant driveway width
would still provide ample maneuvering space for cars„ however, it would decrease the
existing patio area. Mr. Rucci should address the hardship that may occur if he had to
remove this concrete area.
In summary, Mr. Rucci's building contractor submitted the wrong information which
resulted in the issuance of a permit for a patio enclosure structure less than 141 feet away
from the garage. We concur with other Village departments that do not have a problem
with a 5.75 foot separation between the two structures. The driveway width could be
reduced to meet Code without creating maneuveringproblems, however, the existing
pavement is not expected to impact the neighborhood if left at its present width.
PB:hg
10 S D1 4 ehl &4@ an Z relp
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 4083
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities adopted Ordinance No. 4083 on
August 15, 1989, which Ordinance No. 4083 authorized the sale of
specified personal property owned by the Village of Mount Prospect
to be sold through an auction to be conducted by the Northwest
Municipal Conference on September 16, 1989; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the Village of Mount Prospect
will host an auction to be conducted by the Northwest Municipal
Conference at the Mount Prospect Herbert L. Weeks Public Works
Facility, 1700 West Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois on
Saturday, October 14, 1989; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect would be served by offering the personal
property for sale at the auction to be held in Mount Prospect on
October 14, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: "That Ordinance No. 4083 adopted August 15, 1989 is
hereby repealed.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1989.
Mount Pr o*pect Public Works Depa 11 rtment
\V INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM aTV tu
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 30, 1989
SUBJ: Surplus Snow Plows
The Public Works Department just accepted a bid for two new 4211
reversible snow plows. These are both replacements for existing
plows. At the time of advertising for bids no one would accept
trade-ins, therefore I request that the three plows listed on
the attached sheet be declared surplus and sold at the Northwest
Municipal Conference Auction to be held at our Public Works
facility on October 14.
z zt�'
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Attached
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF SPECIFIED
PROPERTY OWNED BY THE ..VILL.AGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate
authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no longer
necessary or useful to or in the best interests of the Village of
Mount Prospect to retain ownership of the personal property listed
hereinbelow; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect that the best interests
of the Village would be served by selling said personal property
at a public auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference
on Saturday, October 14, 1989.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois
Municipal Code, Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter 24, Section 11-
76-4, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect find that the personal property listed herein owned by the
Village of Mount Prospect is no longer necessary or useful to said
Village and the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect
will be served by its sale.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorize the sale of the
following personal property owned by the Village of Mount Prospect
through auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference at
the Mount Prospect Herbert L. Weeks Public works Facility, 1700
West Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois on Saturday, October
14, 1989:
MHmn
Vehicle I.D. Number Year Make Price
GlBL5169HX218515 1987 Chevrolet $1,500
GlBL5164HXZ18809 1987 Chevrolet $1,500
GlBL5167HA158866 1987 Chevrolet $1,500
G1BN35H1FX141484 1985 Chevrolet $1,500
GlBL6924FH135652 1985 Chevrolet $1,000
G1AB68C8EA113446 1984 Chevrolet $ 500
T-1089 1984 Bombardier $ 100
1B689AA225545 1980 Chevrolet $ 100
1FABP21B2BX100739 1981 Ford $ 300
F37JLY93334 1977 Ford(Ambulance) $1,500
N/A 1979 Wausau 11 foot
Reversible
Expressway plow
with quick hitch $ 50
N/A 1965 Wausau 10 foot
One-way plow with
pin connection $ 50
SECTION THREE: That the Northwest Municipal Conference is hereby
NWMC Auction
Page 2 of 2
authorized to sell by auction to the highest bidder the personal
property owned by the Village of Mount Prospect listed hereinabove
in the manner provided by law.
SECTION FOUR: That upon receipt of full payment for the item, the
Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to convey and
transfer title to the aforesaid personal property to the successful
bidder.
SECTION FIVE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this dale of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1989.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM nU Crry USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 24, 1989
SUBJECT: Parkway Tree Planting Bid
Sealed bids for parkway tree planting were opened on August 23,
1989. Bids were requested on 1-1/2" trees used in our reforesta-
tion program, plus three 2-1/211 species omitted from our earlier
bid. Bid prices are firm for both the fall 1989 and spring 1990
planting seasons. Bid tabulations are shown on Attachment A.
In order to compare the various bids, we have estimated the
quantities we will order. (See Attachment B.) There is $7000
allocated on page 158 of the 1989-90 budget in account 1-071-08-
6243. The bid submitted by Charles Klehm & Son was the lowest
bid listing all species of our projected quantities. In addi-
tion, they will be providing 211 trees as substitutes for several
of the 1-1/211 species.
At a recent Village Board meeting, a bid was awarded to Berthold
Nursery for 2-1/2" diameter tree planting under the cost share
program. Inadvertently, some species were omitted from that bid
and were rebid at this time. It is projected that residents
will be requesting some of the species under this bid,
and funds under account codes 1-071-08-6241 and 1-071-08-6242
will be used for those purchases. As Charles Klehm & Son Nurs-
ery are the lowest bidder on all trees of the 1-1/211 species, I
recommend they also be awarded a contract to furnish the 2-1/21,
trees as bid. We have had excellent experiences with Klehm &
Son Nursery and, with this action, we'd only be working with two
nurseries on tree planting. I recommend awarding the bid to
Charles Klehm & Son in an amount not to exceed our budget for
the 1-1/211 trees and 2-1/211 trees.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
ATTACHMENT A
August 24, 1989
Exceptions
A. 2" tree B. Princeton Beo�
B. Princeton Sentry or Magyar F. Common Amur ~�^�C~^~tree
C. 2-1/2" tree G. Swamp White
Dia,
Species
(")
Berthold
Klebm
St-&obino
Weiler
English oak
2-1/2
$240'00
$275.UO
No Bid
$229 UO
Greenspire
-
LittIeleaf Linden
2-I/2
287-00
325.00
$285.80
195.00
Redmond Linden
2-I/2
287,00
245.00
385~8U
2lU^OO
Haokbezcy
1-1/2
180.00
125.0(f
-
344`4O
^
I15~UO
Turkish Filbert
I -I/2
^
180 .00
IG5 'u
No ��d
'
�o �i�
Blue Ash
1_1/2
I8000
I35
Autumn Gold Ginkgo
1-1/2
180.00
175,0
" "
150.0&
Tuliptree
1-1/2
I80.00
I75''--
" "
No ` Bi
Sentinel Crabapple
1-1/2
I40.00
l35-.
150
.. .'u
Macho Amur Cozbtree
1-1/2
180.0(f
l25---
--- ,�Op
.00
'
35O �O
'
I4O Onr
Bradford or Autumn
~
Blaze Pear
White Oak
1-I/2
lDO.DV
165.00
300 .00
`
14O Dn
`
Burr Oak
1-1/2
1-1/3
180.00
`
No Bid
225 O
^
225.00k D
�o �i�
�o Bid
it 10
English Oak
1-1/2
180-00
195O`
'' ''
140
Silver Linden
1-1/2
No Bid
325'~U v-
" ..
.00
'v
No Bid
Exceptions
A. 2" tree B. Princeton Beo�
B. Princeton Sentry or Magyar F. Common Amur ~�^�C~^~tree
C. 2-1/2" tree G. Swamp White
ATTACHMENT B
1-1/2" Trees
2ot'
Qty.
Species
Berthold
8Iebm
St,Aubiu
Weiler
6
Haokberry
$1080.00
$ 750.00
$1466.40
¢ 690.00
6
Turkish Filbert
1080.00
990.00
No Bid
No Bid
6
Blue Ash
I080.00
810.00
if
4
Autumn Gold
'
Ginkgo
720,00
700.00
" "
600.00
G
Tuliptree
1080.00
1050-00
" "
No Bid
5
Sentinel Crabapple
700.00
625.00
750.00
" if
IO
Macho Amur cozbtzee
I800.00
1250,00
2500.00
1400'00
5
Bradford or Autumn
__-
Blaze Pear
900.00
825,00
1500.00
700.00
48
Totals . - . .
$8440,00
$7000.00
$6216'40*
$3390.00^
* Incomplete total due to No Bid items
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
If INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7= MY LU
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 30, 1989
SUBJECT: Sealed Bids - Snow Plows
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 AM on August 29, 1989 for ten -
foot -wide, power -reverse snow Plows. Two firms responded out of
three that received bid documents; plus we advertised in the
local paper as required. Optional bids were requested on stain-
less steel moldboards in lieu of steel. Bid results as follows:
Bidder Model/Make Base Bid Option Bid
Illinois Truck #2PR459UAX $6,195.00 $5,795.00
& Equipment Co. Baker/Flink
Flink Company #2PR459UAX $6,300.00 $6,750.00
Flink
There is $11,000 allocated for this purchase on page 154 of the
current budget under account number 51-071-05-8044. These are
replacement plows for trucks currently in the fleet. I recom-
mend awarding the bid to Illinois Truck and Equipment Co. for
two Model 2PR459UAX Baker/Flink power -reverse plows with option-
al stainless steel moldboard, at a total cost not to exceed
$11,590.
IiLA� It)ju
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
bc: Carol Fields
�
` Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: August JO, 1989
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION
On August 30, 1989, at 70:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the
Greenwood Drive and Oneida Lane Reconstruction. At this time, the
sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud.
BID FORM
The Bidder was requested to submit unit prices for the Greenwood Drive
and Oneida Lane Reconstruction Project.
5 Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. 4 total of 3 Contractors
submitted bids. The bids range from a low of $ 213,632.50 by 8 & K
Construction to high of $ 278,790.00 by Vincent Di Vito, Inc. The
Engineer's Estimate for the project was $ 219,959.50.
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds or Cashier's Checks in the amount
of 70% of their total bid as required by the Contract Documents.
All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. The lowest
bid was 3% below the estimate.
All bids were based on our estimate of $ 219,959.50.
RECOMMENDATION
Page two
BIDDER'S�
TOTAL BID
l. A & K Construction Cu, Inc.
Chicago
$
213,632.50
2. Triggi Construction
West Chicago
$
262,206.90
3. Vincent Di Vito, Inc.
Glen Ellyn
$
278,790.00
qPALIFICAT�IONS OF LOW BIDDER
The )ow bidder, 8 & K Construction form Chicago, has not done any
work in the Village of Mount Prospect to date. A & K Construction
did however submit 3 references to projects that they have completed
recently. Each reference that I culled indicated that A & K
Construction's work was completed in a timely manner and was of the
highest quality.
RECOMMENDATION
The Engineering Division recommends awarding this Contract to A &
K Construction Co., Inc. with a Bid price of $ 2ma,63�k.50.
Funding for this project is shown on Page 153 of this year's budget
I concur with the above recommendation
He r & r t* LWe e k �s�
Director of Public Works
RP:CB/r VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
Village of Mount Prospect
Greenwood Drive And Oneida Lane Reconsturction
Augest 30, 1989
1G:00 A.M.
No.
Item
Quantit
A R K Const. Co., Inc.
Chicago
Uni[ Price Total
Triggi Construction Inc.
West Chicago
Unit Price Total
Vincent Divito, Inc.
GI Ellyn
Unit Price Total
tal1.
5.
6.
7.
S.
9.
I0.
It.
1'.
13.
14.
15.
16.
Speciai Excavation
Aggregate Base Course Type H
Bituminous Material Prime Coat MC -30
$ituminous Concrete Binder CourseClass I, Type I, Mixture H
Bituminous Concrete Surface Course
Class 1, Type 1, Mixture D
Combination Concrete Curb & Gutter Type B 3.12
Removal & Replacement
Storm Sewers, Rubber Gasket Ty 1 12'
Trench Backfill
Structure To Be Adjusted wITy I Fr. Open Lid
Structure To He Reconstructed w(fy I Fr. Open Lid
Inlet Type A -w/Ty t Frame, Open Lid
Catch Basin Type A wlly I Frame, Closed Lid
PCC Sidewalk Removal & Replacement 6'
PCC Driveway Pavement Removal &Replacement 6'
Parkway Restoration
Traffic And Dust Control
2750 CY
4265 TON
1455 GAL
795 TON31,005.00,82S.00
370 TON
3455 LF
210 LF
76 TON
I1 EA
3 EA
2 EA
2 EA
500 SF
110 SY
2090 SY
1 L Sum
12.00
33000.00
16.00
49,5rA.00
WW
t7.W
44,000.00,750,002.
72,505.00,d45.003.
1300 SS
14.50 61,642.50
"En
1.50 2,18250
L21 1,760.55
2.00 2,9.0.00,182.504.
-
35.0012,95 0.00
38.50 14,245,00
42.00 t5 540.00
40.00
id,800.0(
-",915
13.00
00
16.00
55,280.00
17.W 58,735,00
(
IS.00
Si,62S.00
32.00
6,720.00
2398
5,035.80
36.00 7560.00
22.00
4 620 00
15.00
t, 14C 00
14.85
1,125.60
15.00 1,140.00
12.00
9!2.00
235.00
2,585.00
321.20
3,533.20
- 300.00 3.300.00
500.00
5,500.00
705.00
2,115.00
748.00
2,244.00
2,500.00 7500.00
750.00
2,250.00
600.00
1.200.00
517.00
1,034.00
600.00 1.200.00
600.00
1,200.00
1,175.00
2,350.00
1,320.00
2,640.00
750.00 1,.500.00
1,200.00
2,400.00
3.50
1,750.00
4.00
2,000.00
4.002,000.00
5.00
2,500.00
42.00
4,620.00
40.50
4,455.00
40.00 4,400.00
-3000
-3,30000
7.00
14,630.00
6.50
13,585.00
5.50 11,495.00
5.00
10,450.00
Total
1,000 009,000.00114
213,632.50
Total
252,206.90 j
000.06
Total 278,790.00 ]
10,000.00
Total
10,000.00
219,954.50
ViPaye Manager
, er
V liaye- AJ,//
/'-r. 'JO -h '? -2)/ x 0 1) ,
OM LLf I b'r? 7LO you.. as )6�rUCkd �C Me- by MC TOLL41
o-pproval fc(, cL IDe-r-mi-i )-, pud- c� brretc
Paha of f)tz bccL 0 � 00'- -lows house . -r WO's i -Nd �� We
� Ile-?uesi a (,)culcl be bmcjhf ccs fo tie
V1165C bcard on �(t
Criciose-d 15 CL Copy Of a- survey 0T- our prcperry
614 Al- 141t 14The yedcui hiyhl1jhkd area. rs presenPV
C'6 d1ch /:5 4)c � is c)c 4A2 pro'OCS& pa b'O
- A� F06y ay -e4- Sa rderd /-0 z� Wesf by 6acLl-clo drILtway,
4- by fc,?Ctek 6-4S�-)by 6kL us
Ctrld -StOA by CL L'.)OOd Sk2cl
be �aken down, the, Or,'-Se')i-SkAd Lu,ll P.P- lei,Szkr)c4l
,Tk will he done- by )0/,fzwj 0. Y- layer ol-I oru6hEcl
grovel t -fin 2' 5anrl , uJe- will CcSe brick- pavers -i4�
/'� will have Sand F)le-d 1 '6'0 �'5• -7-A C/i r- � dmf lued s ic
be- 4LL out- L,),// be u5e-cl �a mise j e
9 or -den Oreo- 1(-)
-theof 4he- �Dwn house- 7 -he- wcr-has
%
been P)OOnled IOY and wlO �W- Cortes by Nr- Johnat Chica5o, u -)ho t5 a- proles sicnol brick )L7Ver. . /-ri u e
Qf2c�4VC )OabO he hof done u3N2h hos verl)qed hls
p a ge-a2l
'7" er'00(-)1^0Lge XCcA- -fv 5ee- our joro9er4-y ,
we- bel eye YC)&L L,),'il god tje- t).e e cl 0- Pail' C)
in o; d,4 j:&ch
CIO
lef U YOU- flkr2 any
�o m Us Sr YOU. have. any
COMM pulfs or, /0S)i(LLe on how
p)ea,,e-
T
hoot yca 4;r your z��xe,
so ro- cc 1-1) C -L /
�—Sk t)en
1�
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois;
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: ' Director Public Works
DATE: August 17, 1989
SUBJECT: Railroad ROW Improvements
In conjunction with our program to improve the appearance of the
C&NW right-of-way, we now are at the last phase of this multi-
year project. Before we install bushes and trees along the
track side of the west commuter lot, it will be necessary to
design, bid and construct a retaining wall between the edge of
the parking lot and the bed of the railroad tracks. This embank-
ment is approximately•800' long and is deteriorating rapidly
through erosion, and its aesthetic appearance looking north from
Prospect Avenue is very poor.
The following engineering consulting firms submitted proposals
for the design, bidding and inspection of this work:
Midwest Consultinq Enqineers
Preliminary phase $ 4,890
Design phase 9,090
Construction phase 13,720
Total not to exceed . . . . . . $27,700
Brighton Engineering Co.
Lump SUM - not to exceed . . . $18,000
Peter F. Olesen and Associates. Inc.
Design and bidding phase $10,900
Foundation investigations 1,500
Construction observation 3,344
Total fee not to exceed . . . . $15,744
Donohue and Associates
Design, specifications & bidding $ 5,900
Soil borings 600
Construction staking 1,400
Inspection 3,000
Total not to exceed . . . . . . $10,900
Design and specifications of this project will be subject not
only to Village approval, but also to approval by Chicago &
North Western Railway officials. The scope of work will include
not only a retaining wall, but also a boxed -out section for
future plantings. Landscaping will not be a part of this work.
Funding for this study should be charged against the Parking Lot
Maintenance Fund an page 196, account code 46-073-03-6228.
I recommend acceptance of the proposal as submitted by Donohue
and Associates in an amount not to exceed $10,900. This project
would not be bid until mid -winter, with construction to begin in
the spring of 1990. After all costs are known, it is possible
that the Chicago and North Western Railway may participate in
the costs.
HLW/td
,__-LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL,,--f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 29, 1989
SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN PARKING STUDY
On July 31, 1989, four consultants submitted proposals for a downtown parking study. The
proposals included an estimate of project cost for Alternative A, being the entire Central
Business District (C.B.D.), and Alternative B, the Emerson Street corridor. The proposals
are summarized below:
Alternative A Afternative B
C.B.D. Emerson St.
Rich and Associates
Southfield, Michigan $13,018 $2,749
Barton-Aschman
Evanston, Illinois $19,300 $13,950
Peter Olesen & Associates
Mount Prospect, Illinois $24,985 $10,100
Walker Consultants
Elgin, Illinois $37,820 $23,500
These proposals were reviewed by a Committee consisting of the Planning and Zoning
Department and representatives of the Mount Prospect library and First Chicago Bank.
You will recall that the library and bank were to share in the study cost.
The Committee found that all four consultants adequately addressed the necessary scope
of services. However, after analysis, it was determined that Rich and Associates provided
the best proposal at a more reasonable price. It was determined that the three other
proposals estimated considerable time and expense in background studies and inventory
work. You will remember that the planning staff completed a parking inventory in 1988,
and we believe this information is valuable in a more comprehensive study. Rich and
Associates make good use of this information in the initial phase of their study. The staff
report is reviewed and updated, and made a part of the overall report. The other proposals
acknowledge the 1988 study, but it seems as if this information on -band is duplicated to
some extent.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
August 29, 1989
In order to make best use of the staff study from 1988, and to keep costs to a more
reasonable level, it is recommended that the Village Board enter into a contract with Rich
and Associates for a Central Business District Parking Study, in the amount of $8,518, with
a not to exceed amount of $4,500 for reimbursables, such as travel and accommodations,
for a total amount of $13,018.
The Planning and Zoning staff has checked the references of Rich and Associates and the
consultant has been recommended by other municipalities.
DMC:hg
140unt Wor4
,- OsPect public
I W,s OePartinent
INTEROFFICE MEMORANI)UM
TO:
Village Manager
FROM: Director public
-DAT_P: September
tember 1
SUBJECT: , 1989
"100ding Concerns, Wa_pell,/,, %
On August 12 1989 entral
Wa-Pella attended t sixteen residents
answers a COffe ts Of the
several to flooding Prob e With COU * zero block of S.
Years lems �cil meeting
On their block looking
we have experienced Over th
that have res�lted in for
Village- The latest localized Periods Of h e past
Intersection oflatest flooding in heavy' rainfall
ajor storm was many areas of the
a -Pella and c as On August 4t
eptly ente red the comb. entral flooded
August combined sew 1989, When the
charging and backup , er syst and runoff
31t 1989 into residents, em on wa-pella appar-
When Over two t we again basements , caus ng sur-
co
ur
of ti inches of had flood' 'The ev - I
time. Alain, Ing at Wa-* ening of
combi n, Overflowraln fell I. a relat The
and Cent al
ran South 0 I'vely r
ned sewer and caused backup into n Wa-pella an short Period
have secured pr at least d entered the
conduct a OPOsals from One basemen
study Of this t.
Village On evaluat two local e
tives Problem and ngineering
tionst and reco make re firms to
ItImen1doanti0o'nsthe. curren commendations
system, analysis 0 to the
study and are
firms have c with cost es
are highly
'e": Onsiderable e estimates on f alterna-
Ommended. p. xPerience 1 Possible Sol,_
RJN OPOsals as f n this type of
Environmental Assoc- S:
Harza Engineering Compalatesp Inc. follows:
Company $ 9,60o.00
I recommend the Proposal as $11,000.00
dates
for $9600 be accep submitted
ted. by "JN Environmental Asso-
HLW/td H Or bear �t
attach. L- Qes�
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
August 31, 1989
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services
Central Avenue Stormwater Management Feasibility Study
Dear Mr, Weeks:
Thank you for the opportunity to meet with you on August 29,
1989 to discuss the localized flooding conditions that occur
near the intersection of Central Road and Wa-Pella Avenue in the
Village of Mount Prospect. RJN Environmental is pleased to
respond with this proposal to perform a feasibility study to
develop recommendations to improve stormwater management control
in the area.
Based on a preliminary inspection of the area and review of
available maps, we understand that storm water collects near the
intersection of Central and Wa-Pella. During moderate to heavy
rainfall events, the storm water travels overland toward
Wa-Pella and surcharges the combined sewer system, resulting in
basement backups. Commercial buildings along Central suffer
damage to mechanical equipment located in grade level
structures. Also, Central Road becomes nearly impassable to
traffic as a result of 6- to 8 -inches of standing water.
The area tributary to the intersection is approximately bounded
by Northwest Highway, Lancaster Street, Central Road, west
property lines of homes along Wa-Pella Avenue, and Hi-Lusi
Avenue. The total area of the study basin is approximately
50 acres. Drainage along Central Road is provided by a 12 -inch
diameter combined sewer that has a cross connection to a 54 -inch
Metropolitan Water Reclamation District interceptor on Prospect
Avenue.
Briefly, our qualifications include specialty services for
municipal infrastructure management including underground
utilities. We have performed many similar programs for
municipalities in the Mount Prospect area and are very familiar
with the MWRDGC interceptor system, and other agencies (IDOT,
Chicago & Northwestern Railroad, etc.) that may be affected by
the project.
202 W. FRONT STREET
WHEATON, ILLINOIS 60187
(312) 682-4777
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
August 31, 1989
Page Two
SCOPE OF SERVICES
RJN Environmental.
proposes to investigate the study area and
develop feasible alternatives for improved stormwater management
control. The feasibility study will include preliminary cost
estimates for construction of improvements and a recommended
plan.
An overview of the proposed work tasks for the study are as
follows:
1. Project initiation
The project will be initiated by collecting background
data. Available data will be reviewed concerning the
existing combined sewer system, MWRDGC interceptors, and
drainage ditches in the project vicinity. It is assumed
that the topographic information provided by the Village is
sufficient for the purpose of analyzing drainage patterns
within the study area. Village records and information
from other governmental agencies including MWRDGC, IDOT-
Division of Water Resources, and IDOT-District 1 would also
be collected and reviewed. Village Public Works personnel
would be interviewed to further define the condition and
operation of existing facilities during storm events.
2. Field Investigations
RJN Environmental will perform limited field investigations
to verify elevations of critical structures such as
manholes and storm inlets. In addition, the project team
will inspect the area to obtain first hand information
concerning the behavior and operation of existing
facilities. It is anticipated that television inspection
of some combined sewer lines may be necessary and that the
Village would perform this work with their equipment and
provide video tapes for review by RJN Environmental.
3. Evaluation of Existing System
The objective of this task is to evaluate the conveyance
capabilities and behavior of the existing combined sewer
system. A hydraulic capacity analysis would be performed
to determine the extent and approximate degree of existing
storm protection. A comparison of projected flows
tributary to the combined sewer to actual pipe capacity
would also be made.
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
August 31, 1989
Page Three
4. Analysis of Alternatives
This task would involve analyses of the information and
formulation of alternatives for improved stormwater
management control. Preliminary cost estimates would be
prepared for all feasible alternatives and a comparison of
alternatives would be made based on a cost/benefit ratio.
Alternatives that may be considered for evaluation include
partial sewer separation, storage of stormwater, parallel
combined relief sewers, and construction of stormwater
pumping facilities. For example, it may be feasible to
intercept storm flow from the northside of the Chicago and
Northwestern Railroad and divert it away from the
intersection of Central and Wa-Pella.
5. Final Recommendations and Report
The final major work task would involve refining the
recommendations after input from the Village. A draft
report would be prepared together with engineering
documentation, recommendations, cost estimates, and
exhibits. After discussion with Village officials for
review of the draft report, a final report would be
prepared and submitted. Specific items that would be
included in this phase of the project are as follows:
A. summarize recommended alternatives, cost
estimates, and benefits.
B. Develop a preliminary and prioritized capital
improvement program.
C. Meet and discuss recommended alternatives with
the Village.
D. Prepare a draft engineering report with a
description of facilities, recommendations, cost
estimates and anticipated benefits.
E. Submit and discuss draft report with Village
representatives.
F. Prepare and submit Final Report.
SCHEDULE AND COMPENSATION
RJN Environmental is available to initiate the feasibility study
immediately. It is anticipated that approximately eight weeks
will be required to complete the study and submit the draft
report.
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
August 31, 1989
Page Four
Engineering cost for the feasibility study is proposed for a
lump sun fee of $9,600 based on the scope of work described
herein. Payments to RJN Environmental shall be made monthly
upon receipt of a combined status report ana invoice to be
submitted to the Village by RJN Environmental. Invoices shall
be due and payable within thirty (30) days of each billing.
Because of the short time schedule to prepare this proposal, we
have not included a detailed qualification statement for the
subject project. We will be pleased to present our
qualifications in a submittal to you if desired.
We trust this proposal meets with your approval. If acceptable,
one fully executed copy of this proposal will authorize us to
proceed with the work. If you prefer, a formal agreement can be
prepared for your review.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal and look
forward to further discussions on this project. Should you have
any questions, or need additional information, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
Very truly yours,
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
7IA404Y
6 John M. Nardozzi, P.E. 1Business Development Manager
fi-TI-1 �k- I
ACCEPTED FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Name
Title
Date
gpgp I ,
150 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 606064288
Tel. (312) 8553300 Telex 253540
August 31, 1989
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
Public Works Facility
1700 W. Central Road
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Subject: Proposal for Engineering Study to Correct
Flooding Problems on Central Road and
Wa-Pella Street
Dear Mr. Weeks:
We are pleased to present our proposal to conduct an engineering
study for the subject project. Because of the limited time to
prepare this proposal, we have omitted supporting information
regarding qualifications/experience, personnel, and project
management. We have limited our proposal to an understanding of
the project, a proposed scope of services, schedule, and terms of
compensation.
Our understanding of the project is based on a meeting between
Mr. John P. Velon of our office and your staff on August 30, 1989
and a review of materials provided by your office.
The project is to analyze the surface flooding and basement backup
problems along Central Road and Wa-Pella Street, develop
alternative solutions and associated costs to correct the problems,
and work with the staff to develop a recommended plan for board
action.
Intense rainfall events, such as the August 4, 1989 storm, have
resulted in significant surface flooding and basement backup in the
area of Central and Wa-Pella. The August 4, 1989 event caused
surface flooding damage to a number of commercial buildings along
Central, surface flooding of the Northwest Highway via flow under
the railroad tracks, surface flooding for one block on wa-Pella,
and basement backups for two blocks on Wa-Pella.
Finding solutions to these problems will require analyses of the
drainage area tributary to the MSD 54" interceptor on Central. Of
primary importance is to ensure that the solutions do not transfer
the problem to other residences, commercial areas, MSDGC, IDOT, or
the railroad.
Fx2nQscd Sc in of Serviges
7be proposed scope of services consists of the following:
1. Perform field reconnaissance including surveying of
inverts on affected sewers, and ditches.
2. Establish ILLUDAS storm water simulation model for the
drainage area.
3. Use ILLUDAS to generate runoff hydrographs and assess the
performance of existing system during storm events of 2,
5, 10, 100 year events.
4. Determine causes of related problems (Northwest Highway,
basement backup, etc) during various events.
5. Develop alternative solutions to the problem.
Alternatives to include additional conveyance and storage
options.
6. Assess impacts of various alternative solutions with
respect to IDOT, Wa-Pella sewer system south of Lincoln,
and MSD interceptor. Contact agencies to determine
feasibility of implementing solutions.
7. Develop estimates of construction cost for various
alternatives.
8. Develop report in 5 copies to define alternatives, costs,
and level of protection of various alternative solutions.
Develop recommended plan with input from Village staff.
9. Assist the Village staff in presenting plan and
alternatives to the Board.
Schedule
The draft report will be targeted for a completion of 30 days after
receipt of notice -to -proceed.
Scope of services items numbers I through 8 will be completed for
a lump sum cost of $11,000. Services required, if any, associated
with Item 9 (meetings, presentations, etc.) will be billed on a
cost plus arrangement in accordance with the attached Schedule of
Charges.
JMUJ"Z%S, I#C.
150 South Wacker Drive Chicago, Illinois 60606.4288
Tel. (312) 655.3300 Telex 253540
For the consulting engineering services covered by the accompanying proposal letter,
Harza Environmental Services, Inc. shall be paid monthly the sum of:
1. Direct Salaries, plus
2. Overhead Costs and Fee, computed at 200% of Direct Salaries, plus
3. Direct Costs
1. Direct Salaries - Actual salaries paid to all personnel, including officers, engineers,
designers, supervisors, draftsmen, other technical personnel, word processors,
and other personnel for the time directly engaged on the work.
2. (a) Overhead Costs - Costs which cannot be allocated
to specific projects, examples are vacation time,
sick leave time, holidays, social security taxes,
general administrative payroll, general stenographic
and clerical payroll, rent of office and drafting room
space, utilities, depreciation of office equipment,
cost of maintaining customary liability and property
insurance, etc.
(b) Fee - Payment to the Company for interest on invested
capital, readiness to serve and profit.
3. Direct Costs - Costs which are directly applicable to the work such as
transportation and subsistence expenses on travel in the interest of the work,
relocation expense for field assignments, tong distance telephone, telegraph and
telex expenses, reproductions, special insurance, Harza (in-house) and outside
electronic computer rental costs, usage of computer programs, model and
laboratory testing, aerial and ground surveying and subsurface exploration.
When the costs of model and laboratory testing, aerial and ground surveying,
subsurface exploration, and outside electronic computer rental costs are not paid
directly to the laboratory, contractor, or supplier by the Client, an addition of 10%
will be made to cover handling and financing costs.
C. General Terms and Conditions
The general terms and conditions on the reverse side are incorporated into and made
a part hereof.
SOF 089200 NORTHBROOK
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
August 31, 1989
Page 3
Harza is eager to undertake this pioject, and is experienced in all
aspects of the work. We have worked on similar projects in Des
Plaines, Park Ridge, Evanston, Skokie, Glenview and Elmhurst. We
are familiar with technical, administrative, and regulatory aspects
of the problem. We are very well qualified and sincerely want to
help you solve the problem.
very truly ours,
ohn P. Velon
roject Manager
JPV/se
Wa-Pella Sewer Survey
Augub-c 4, 1989 - Approximately 4 inches' of rainfall
Basement
Overhead Downspout Stairwell Flooding
Address Septic Unknown Sewer Gravity Connected Drain Amount
6 S. WMella X X X LA
7..,S..,,. WSa
,pella X X X
8__S. Wapella X
10 S. Wapella
X
CS.
X
6
11 S. Wapella,
X
X
X
2 X
12_S. Wapella
X
X
X
X -
13 S. Wapella
X
X
X
X -
14 S. Wapella
X
X
X
15 S. Wapella
X
X
X
X (2),
16.S. Wapella
X
X
X 211
17 S. Wagella
X
X
X -
18,S. Wapella
X
X
X
2 X 3-4t'
19 S. Wapella
X
X
20..S. Wapella
S.
X
X X 4 X (LT) -
21 S. Wapella
X
X
X
Y
X X 211
22S. Wapella
X
X
23 S. Wagella
X
X
4 X 1-2"
100 S. Wapella
X
X
X
2
101 S. Wapella
X
X
X
3
102 S. Wa2ella
X
X
X Itt
106
S.
Wapella
X
107S.
Wapella
X
X
108.S.
Wapella
X
109
S.
Wapella.
X
110
S.
Wapella. X
X
111S.
Wapella
X
X (2),
112S.
Wapella
X X 2 X
113
S.
Wagella
X X 3 X X 1/411
114
S.
Wapella
X
115S.
Wapella X
X X
116
S.
Wapella
X X 4 X (LT) -
117 _
118
S.
S.
±apella
WaDella
X
Y
X
V
120 S. Wagella X
121,.,S. Wapella X X X 3
122 S. Wapella X X 2
123_S.. Wagella X
Totals 19 8 5 37
Note: 15 addresses do not have septics.
(CS) Crawlspace
(LA) Large amount
(LT) Little flooding
(1) Basement stairwell sump pump
(2) 3 - Disconnected holes not cemented
(3) Drain next to garage door
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE
OF SEWER GROUTING EQUIPMENT OWNED BY
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corpo-
rate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no
longer necessary or useful to or for the best interests of the
Village of Mount prospect to retain ownership of the personal
property hereinafter described; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and the Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to sell said person-
al property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT:
SECTION ONE: Pursuant fo Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois
Municipal Code, Illinois Revised Statutes, C24, Section 11-76-4,
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect find that the personal property described on the at-
tached form now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, is no
longer necessary or useful to the Village of Mount Prospect, and
the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect will be
served by its sale.
SECTION TWO: The Village Manager is hereby authorized and
directed to sell the aforementioned personal property now owned
by the village of Mount Prospect to Visu-sewer Clean and Seal
Inc., Minneapolis, Minn. for $3500.00.
SECTION THREE:: Upon payment of the full sale price, the
Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to convey and
transfer title to the aforesaid personal property.
SECTION FOUR:. This ordinance shall be in full force and ef-
fect from and after its passage, by a vote of at least three-
fourths of the corporate authorities, and approved in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. -Fields
Village clerk
I
Gerald L. Farley
President
, 1989.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: August 22, 1989
SUBJ: Surplus Sewer Grouting Equipment
Back in 1973 the Village Purchased a cues sewer televising and
grouting unit. Over the years the sewer televising equipment
has been utilized extensively and updated to keep up with the
current technology. The sewer grouting equipment was utilized
for a few years but due to manpower limitations and the toxicity
of the chemicals required we have not done any grouting in-
house, but have instead contracted all work.
About four years ago, when the latest updates were done to the
sewer televising equipment, all the grouting equipment was re-
moved from the vehicle, replaced by our leak detection equipment
and stored away.
At this time we feel that we have no further use for this equip-
ment and would zequest Permission to dispose of it. I have been
in contact with a number of grouting firms but because of the
age of the equipment no one has expressed an interest except one
company.
Visu-sewer Clean and Seal Inc. Out of Minneapolis have offered
$3500-00 for all the equipment listed on the attached sheet.
Since we originally paid $34,000 back in 1973 for the sewer
televising equipment, 4�'111 step van and grouting equipment I
feel this is a very fair price.
I therefore request that the Village Board declare this equip-
ment surplus and the offer from Visu-sewer for $3500.00 be ac-
cepted.
I concur.
I 1*�Ut
Herbert L. Weeks
GRA/HLW/eh
CC: Jerry McIntosh
'I
L VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEALl INC.
NSS W14397 eobolink Avenue. Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 530E51
414-252-3203 FAX 414-252-3195
August 1, 1989
Mr. Glen Adler
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1700 W. central Road
Moupt Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mr. Adler:
Pursuant to our recent conversation, VISU-SEWER priced grouting
equipment that th= Vii:age Of Mount Prospect is selling. VISU-SEWER's
quoted price for all the grouting equipment is 13500/2500 for the ten
packers.
If -- can be of further assistance, please give me a call.
Sincerely,
YA/mm VISU-SEWER CLEAN Se SEAL, INC.
cc: file
Keith Alexander
Marketing Representative
o- a
ft 0
. *7
ri,
Ser-vlrlg-m,-,f-"c-"Palit,es, (..)t:1,t,eS and Irrdu.srry
-• •
1 Reel complete with hoses - 500' 3 cables
2 18" x 36" mixing tanks - stainless steel
1 18" x 60" water tank
1 stand for mixing tanks
1 control unit - valves wisight gauges
1 power supply for quick test
2 packers for 8" pipe
2 packers for 10" pipe
2 packers for 12" pipe
2 packers for 15" pipe
1 packer for 18" pipe
1 packer for 24 pipe
3 - 5 gallon cans catalyst
a.
Mount Prospect Public Works 060artment
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM crry tu
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: August 28, 1989
SUBJ: Forest Ave. Reconstruction - Sewer Repair
As you are aware plans are underway for the reconstruction and
widening of Forest Ave. between Kensington and Memory. In con-
junction with this a contract was just let for the replacement
of the entire watermain. Due to the age of the pipe and a histo-
ry of breaks on this section of waterman it is being replaced to
eliminate the chance of having to dig up a newly reconstructed
street.
Along this same line Village crews have just completed the tele-
vising of the combined sewer system that runs down the center of
Forest Ave. The sewer ranges in diameter from 811 to 18" and all
pipe was okey with the exception of 70 feet of 18" between man-
hole #13 and 13A, see attached.
To line (insituform) the entire sewer between manholes would
cost $35,870, whereas if we just replace the broken sections of
pipe Joel Kennedy has quoted a price of $14,000. Due to the
fact that this is in the middle of the street and no parkway
trees and driveways are involved I would recommend its replace-
ment.
I therefore request the Village Board waive the bidding price
and award a contract to Joel Kennedy for a price not to exceed
$14,000. Joel Kennedy would do this work right away in conjunc-
tion with their recently awarded sewer spot relay contract.
Their price of $200.00 per lineal foot would be hard to beat
considering that.their recent bid awarded prices ranged from
$330.00 to $350.00 per lineal foot for 811 to 12". The price was
low due to its location and the fact their crews will be in town.
I concur with this recommendation.
erbert L. Weeks
14 - hj
SEWEfig
A NA-40LE 5 IN
"r 11-M ONLY
MT. PROSPECT T.V. LOG
TAPE NO. START FINISH
DATE _ _ OPERATORu 1?L4le � DATE CLEANED
MANHOLE NO. TO NO.) 3 ^ PIPE SIZE
DIRECTION OF PULL OR'T u Spy? TYPE OF PIPE
DIRECTION OF FLOW `j- MANHOLE CONDITION
QUADRANTS
E34 2
E1
l
13 -A
insicu"ni,
MIDWEST
INC.
August 23, 1989
Village Of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr, Glen Andler
RE: Insituform Proposal
18" Sewer -Forest Ave.
Dear Mr. Andler:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit
as follows: this Proposal for Insituform
Manhole 13 to 13A 18" Diam 31-8 L.P.@ Lump sum = $33,830.00
Lateral -�in-itements: 6 @ $340 Each =
Cut Protz,diny Taps: 0 @ $340 Each = $ 2,040.00$ 0.00
Total $35,870.00
Dry weather inversion only.
All labor, equipment, material, supervision, and mobilization necessary
to complete the Insituform process per the above conditions, and the
attached INA Specifications, is included.
This Proposal is good for 60 days.
Very truly yours,
INSITUFORM MIDWEST, INC.
D4I -r
4*
ine . Bowers
Engineer
DGB:ts
P.O. Box 458 - Lemont, Illinois 60439 . Phone 312-257-2209 or 800-633-6333 - Fax 312-257.9712
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM ary USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: August 28, 1989
SUBJ: Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation - Insituform
In the current budget there are funds allocated for sanitary
Sewer repairs. Based on our schedule of Proposed sanitary sewer
system improvements and as presented during the budget bearings,
the following sewers need to be relined:
1. Briarwood Drive East
Manhole # 7 - 8 - 8" diam. 285 lineal feet
Lump sum cost $27,250.00
2. Lincoln Easement
Manhole #51 - 50 - 12" diam. 132 lineal feet
Lump sum cost $17,150.00
3. Thayer
Manhole #9 12" diam. 340 lineal feet
Lump sum cost $26,920.00
Combined Total $_71,320.00
All three segments of these sanitary sewer mains have been loca-
tions of reoccurring sewer blocks, partially collapsed pipes,
and continual maintenance due to the root growth at the joints.
They're also all located within either rear yard easements or
parkways that are all tree lined. I therefore recommend we use
the Insituform sewer lining process to repair the entire sani-
tary sewer lines between the manholes listed above.
The cost to reline these sewers is estimated at $71,320 includ-
ing lining, lateral reinstatement, cleaning, and removal of
protruding taps as outlined on the attached proposals from
Insituform Midwest, Inc. Insituform Midwest has an exclusive
franchise agreement for this area and thus is the only contrac-
tor who can do this work.
I would therefore request a waiver of the bidding process and
that the Village Board award a contract to Insituform Midwest
for an amount not to exceed $71,320. Funding for this proposed
2
fo
"Joe'
.2
26
2.5
27-
28
10
32
kK
insi u no
MIDWEST
INC.
July 27, 1989
Village of mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr. Glen Andler
RE: Insituform Proposal
Briarwood Drive East
Dear Mr. Andler:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for Insitu-
form as follows:
MH 7-8 8" Diam. 285 L,F. @ Lump Sum = $22,730.00
Lateral Reinstatements: 8 @ $340 Each = $ 2,720.00
Cut Protruding Taps: 1 @ $1800 Each = $ 1,800.00
$21,256.00
All labor, equipment, material, supervision, and mobilization
necessary to complete the Insituform process per the above conditions,
and the attached INA Specifications, is included.
This proposal is good for 60 days.
Very truly yours,
INSITUFORM MIDWEST, INC.
Diane Z� �Bowers ale
Engineer
DGB: ts
P.O. Box 458 - Lemont, Illinois 60439 - Phone 312-257-2209 or 800-633.6333 . Fax 312-257-9712
R&I
SEWER
54"
15S
ss "E
59
AVE
insiru"m
MIDWEST
INC.
July 27, 1989
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr. Glen Andler
RE: Insituform Proposal
Lincoln Easement
Dear Mr. Andler:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for Insitu-
form as follows:
MH 51-50 12" Diam. 132 L.P. @ Lump Sum = $16,810.00
Lateral Reinstatements: 1 @ $340 Each = $ 340.00
Cut Protruding Taps: 0 @ $1800 Each = $ 0.00
$17,150.00
All labor, equipment, material, supervision, and mobilization
necessary to complete the Insituform process per the above con-
ditions, and the attached INA Specifications, is included.
This proposal is good for 60 days.
Very truly yours,
INSITUFORM MIDWEST, INC.
diane G. owers
Engineer
DGB:ts
P.O. Box 458 - Lemont, Illinois 60439 - Phone 312-257-2209 or 800-6316333 - Fax 312-257-9712
E.'/z S.E.'/4 Sec. 35-42-11
w u F F i inur-I
insi u
n
MIDWEST
INC.
August 3, 1989
Village of mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr. Glen Andler
RE: Insituform Proposal
Estates & Thayer
Dear Mr. Andler:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for Insitu-
form as follows:
Thayer MH 9-11 12" Diam. 340 L.F. @ Lump Sum = $25,220.00
Lateral Reinstatements: 5 @ $340 Each = $ 1,700.00
Cut Protruding Taps: 0 @ $1800 Each = $ 00.00
Subtotal
All labor, equipment, material, supervision, and mobilization
necessary to complete the Insituform process per the above con-
ditions, and INA Specifications, is included.
This proposal is good for 60 days.
Very truly yours,
INSITUFORM MIDWEST, INC.
Diane G. Bowers
Engineer
DGB.ts
P.O. Box 458 . Lemont, Illinois 60439 . Phone 312-257-2209 or 800-633.6333 - Fax 312-257-9712
7= CM USA
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM.: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: August 28, 1989
SUBJ: Village sanitary Sewer Rehab - Change Order
In conjunction with the Village's Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Program it is necessary to request a change order which affects
three current contracts. The 8" diameter sanitary sewer that is
located on Estates Drive between manhole numbers 14 and 16 was
originally slated for two(2) spot repairs and complete
grouting. This was based on the findings of the original SSES
Report that dates back to 1979. After review by the grouting
contractor, retelevising by Village forces and reevaluation by
our consultant, Donohue, it has been determined that the sewer
has now deteriorated to a state that requires its complete re-
placement versus the original spot relays and grouting, see
attached• We would just be throwing money away if we do just
the spot relays and grouting. In fact the grouting company
would not be able to guarantee his work because of all the bro-
ken pipe not slated for repair.
Under this proposed change order the two spot relays will be
eliminated from the recently awarded contract to Joel Kennedy
for an estimated credit of $13,890-00. Also this entire Section
(#269) will be deleted from Visu-Sewer's contract for a credit
of an estimated $1,392.00. This section would then be added to
Insituform Midwest's contract at a cost of $35,320.00. Con-
tract reductions do not require Village Board approval, but the
contract addition would.
I therefore request the Village Board approve the addition to
Insituform Midwest's contract for an amount not to exceed
$35,320.00. The original contract was approved on September 20,
1988 for the amount of $287,676.50. Due to the fact that the
Village may receive an TEPA Grant for this work I would rather
add this to their original contract versus awarding a new con-
tract.
-Glen R. Andle
I concur with this recommendation.
HerDert L. Weeks
GRA/eh
CC: Jerry McIntosh
vJ
VISLI-SEWERCLEANmoi. SEAL INC.
N59 W1 4397 Bobolink Ave., Menomonee Falls, Wisconsin 53041.(4141252-32bZ
Donohue & Associates, Inc.
625 East Pratt Blvd.
Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007
Attn: Mr. David Seidenzahl
RE: Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Sanitary sewer Rehab.
Donohue No. 15801
Dear Mr. Seidenzahl:
I have reviewed Mount Prospect's video tape on the above Project and
came up with the following information.
Section #157
- Bonita Ave.
MH 29 to MH 28 - 10" Dia.
170 Ft.
158 Ft, broken pipe to 167
ft.. Dig up
before att,. mutinq
to test & coal. C %A- ft a-ff J60 -1-L V
C ;-Z- h
eT
Section #158
- Bonita Ave.
MH 28 to MH 21 - 1011 Dia.
205 Ft.
80 Ft. start crown crack to
120 ft.
120 Ft. broken pipe
188 Ft. broken pipe to 190
ft.
199 Ft. Longitudinal crack
to 206 ft.
Replace this line— cL,,Lc.4r., c
*-Section #269
- Estates Drive
MH 14 to MH 16 - 8" Dia. - 359 Ft.
124 Ft. brokenpipe to 126 ft,
153 Ft. crack at 3:00 running to 159 ft.
167 Ft. cracked Pipe/replace
193 Ft. protruding lateral 211 - packer will not pass
remove
194 Ft. longitudinal crack to 204 ft.
t245 Ft. longitudinal crack to 249 ft.
0252 Ft. longitudinal crack to 278 ft.
298 Ft. longitudinal crack to 300 ft.
Roots block view of camera for rest of line
Cracks seem to continue. Recommendation Lace
.complete line.
-ren-k>er of
Serving-MuniciPalities, Utilities and Industry
Section #202 - Hilburn Ave.
Fifteen remaining sections were not re -televised and each have dig ups
in them.
At this time I feel the manholes on this project could be grouted
right away but because of the lines needing dig ups we should wait
until the spot repairs are done.
Sections #158 and u269 should be eliminated from this contract and
J
relayed in total length.
I will UPS the video tape of Mount Prospect back to them today.
If you have any questions pertaining to my letter, please give me a
call.
Sincerely,
VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL, INC.
Ernest L. Alexander
President
ELA:rf
cc:file
MH 39 to MH 38 - 811 Dia. - 187 Ft.
10 Ft. longitudinal crack to 20 ft. with
cracked pipe
at 18 ft. - Replace - e -
Section #293
- Hatlen Ave.
MH 25 to MH 19 - 1211 Dia. - 283 Ft.
277 Ft. longitudinal crack to 281 ft.
Replace
Also the following sec tons on tne
tape and could be
done.
Section #103
- County Lane
MH 25 to MH 24 - 8" Dia. - 336 Ft. ^10
A'C--"—
Section #295
- Busse Road
MH 44 to MH 45 - 12" Dia. - 280 Ft.
Fifteen remaining sections were not re -televised and each have dig ups
in them.
At this time I feel the manholes on this project could be grouted
right away but because of the lines needing dig ups we should wait
until the spot repairs are done.
Sections #158 and u269 should be eliminated from this contract and
J
relayed in total length.
I will UPS the video tape of Mount Prospect back to them today.
If you have any questions pertaining to my letter, please give me a
call.
Sincerely,
VISU-SEWER CLEAN & SEAL, INC.
Ernest L. Alexander
President
ELA:rf
cc:file
r*
4Xi
CA ROL
DEBORAH
i
rjr .r
µ xd 00
/f ,yak c
G,,► n L ., o „ ' f�i �ti F �a. �. n�. N w [. G „ ,.-.` C """� u.. ry .� 1,....; _
4 �
N a
C,
-74
Qu
N o
o w
g � ,w d o N � \ cs o n m � `y n n, • � b 4
h b eaM w w ya C y /y,,
47" ra 0 C
�"• a v p o o 01 c h h w o -a , w. " ` v o V o O$ w
'G � `+• <u fL� a A, 4:w � ar nw ®d d� � � er xo r as
44
G5 ��
vto un ♦ a W m �� `et "x"y, *. o i,. .a ., L sJ,xx ar X. •ate J.+o i.'!"1,..
� +♦ o o � 0 9 0 b a � C � p C G 0 _ � � of ° b 4 {o
n � ,
. Ls .. u a. Yw a .. ..+Qi a iT,rm � � 4 4. C ik • Lwn x*'a b XL C O) iJ r Yk wo AJ m�e.
(y • o
N� at � �'. �
a
W ^ g UV
r
insiru"m
MIOWEST
INC.
August 3, 1989
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr. Glen Andler
RE: Insituform Proposal
Estates & Thayer
Dear Mr. Andler:
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal for Insitu-
form as follows:
Estates MH 14-16 8" Diam. 357 L.F. @ Lump Sum = $23,700.00
Late -al Peinstatements: 13 @ $340 Each = 4,420.00
Cut 2rotruding Taps: 4 @ $1800 Each = ...... 7,200.00
Subtotal $35,320.00
All labor, equipment, material, supervision, and mobilization
necessary to complete the insituform process per the above con-
ditions, and INA Specifications, is included.
This Proposal is good for 60 days.
Very truly yours,
INSITUFORM MIDWEST, INC.
Diane G. Bowers
Engineer
DGB:ts
P.O. Box 458 . Lemont, Illinois 60439 . Phone 372-2572209 or 800.633.6333 . Fax 312-257.9712
Rhone 312 / 392-6000
A G E N D A
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Regular meeting
September 6, 1989
Trustees, ROOM, 2n4 Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P. M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 16, 1989 MEETING
IV. SUBDIVISIONS
A. Plats of Easement for Lots 2, 3, 6, 18 and 20 on
Kennicott Place for Village Easement to B -Boxes
V. COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development Committee Mr. Richardson
B. Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern
C. Development Code Committee Mr. Kloster
D. Text Amendment Committee M?-- Ihm-In ---
Vi. OLD BUSINESS
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Introduction - Mayor Gerald L. (Skip) Farley
B. Fair Housing Presentation by Owen Thomas, Evanston
Human Relations Commission and Northwest Board of
Realtors Representative
VIII. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Ix. ADJOURNMENT
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W. BUSSE
TIMOTHY J, CORCORAN
LED FLOROS
GEORGE A. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENSERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A. FIELDS
Rhone 312 / 392-6000
A G E N D A
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
Regular meeting
September 6, 1989
Trustees, ROOM, 2n4 Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P. M.
I. CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 16, 1989 MEETING
IV. SUBDIVISIONS
A. Plats of Easement for Lots 2, 3, 6, 18 and 20 on
Kennicott Place for Village Easement to B -Boxes
V. COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development Committee Mr. Richardson
B. Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern
C. Development Code Committee Mr. Kloster
D. Text Amendment Committee M?-- Ihm-In ---
Vi. OLD BUSINESS
VII. NEW BUSINESS
A. Introduction - Mayor Gerald L. (Skip) Farley
B. Fair Housing Presentation by Owen Thomas, Evanston
Human Relations Commission and Northwest Board of
Realtors Representative
VIII. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
Ix. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
AUGUST 16, 1989
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was
called to order by Chairman Donald Weibel at 8:00 P.M. at the
Village Hall, 100 South Emerson St., Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL
Present upon Roll Call: Frank Boege
Tom Borrelli
Frank Breitsameter
Lynn Kloster
Tom McGovern
William Navigato
Errol Richardson
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Absent: None
Village Staff Present: Michael Sims, Staff Planner
Press Staff Present: Joyce Harper, mt. Prospect Journal & Topics
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
It was noted that in the minutes of the August 2, 1989 meeting, in
the second to last paragraph on page 3, Northern Illinois Planning
Commission should have been Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission.
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. Borrelli, that the minutes of
August 2, 1989(as corrected) be approved. All members voted Aye and
Chairman Weibel declared the minutes approved.
Chairman Weibel suggested that the names of commission members
voting Nay on motions be reflected in the meeting minutes. This
will be done in the future.
SUBDIVISIONS
None
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community
Development: Covered under New Business
B. Comprehensive
Plan: No report
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2
AUGUST 2, 1989
COMMITTEE REPORTS (cont1d)
c. Development
Code: No report
D. Text Amendment: No report
OLD BUSINESS
Chairman Weibel stated that discussion on low income housing
would be postponed to the next meeting so that members might
review the Village of Mount Prospect Three -Year Housing Assist-
ance Plan.
Mr. Weibel also reported that Mayor Farley had agreed to attend
the first meeting in September.
An expert on or someone with fair housing ordinance experience
has not been obtained. Mr. Sims will try to obtain someone for
a future meeting.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Sims passed out a summary report of Mount Prospect's Com-
munity Block Grant Performance for fiscal year 1988 which ended
May 1, 1989. He reviewed the program in more detail for the
Commission after which the members thanked him for an excellent
report.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Chairman declared the
meeting closed at 9:15 P.M.
Respectfully submitted
Lynn M. Kloster, Secretary
Rhone 312 / 392-6000
AGENDA
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Special Meeting
Thursday, September 7, 1989
8:00 P. M.
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
,ZBA-57-V-89. Hampton Sgrvices. Inc.. NQllhw&9 Yff n An ry St CoMer f R! a d F nd Roadl
The applicant is requesting a variation from the following sections:
1. Section 14.2102.A to allow a 20 foot minimum front yard instead of the required
30 feet.
2. Section 14.2102.E to allow a parking lot setback of 20 feet from the right-of-way
instead of 30 feet and 15 feet from the adjacent residential district instead of 20 feet.
The variations are sought in order to construct a car wash. Village Board action will be
required for both requests.
ZBA-58-Yh and Darlene Holik, 80 Ed2ewood Lane
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016,A.3 in order to construct a
driveway 49'-10" wide instead of the required 21 feet allowed by Code. Village Board
action will be required with this case.
Resolutions
ZBA-53-V-89, Donald and Elaine Dziedzic, 103 S. Edward St.
ZBA-54-V-89, Pellegrino Caputo, 805 Kennicott Place
ZBA-56-V-89, Mark la bus, 416 and 418 S. Maple St.
In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen (15) day period is
provided for anyone wishing to appeal their decision. No permit will be issued until this
period has elapsed.
MAYOR
GERALD L FARLEY
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
MARK W BUSSE
TIMOTHY J. CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE CLERK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
CAROL A, FIELDS
Rhone 312 / 392-6000
AGENDA
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Special Meeting
Thursday, September 7, 1989
8:00 P. M.
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
,ZBA-57-V-89. Hampton Sgrvices. Inc.. NQllhw&9 Yff n An ry St CoMer f R! a d F nd Roadl
The applicant is requesting a variation from the following sections:
1. Section 14.2102.A to allow a 20 foot minimum front yard instead of the required
30 feet.
2. Section 14.2102.E to allow a parking lot setback of 20 feet from the right-of-way
instead of 30 feet and 15 feet from the adjacent residential district instead of 20 feet.
The variations are sought in order to construct a car wash. Village Board action will be
required for both requests.
ZBA-58-Yh and Darlene Holik, 80 Ed2ewood Lane
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016,A.3 in order to construct a
driveway 49'-10" wide instead of the required 21 feet allowed by Code. Village Board
action will be required with this case.
Resolutions
ZBA-53-V-89, Donald and Elaine Dziedzic, 103 S. Edward St.
ZBA-54-V-89, Pellegrino Caputo, 805 Kennicott Place
ZBA-56-V-89, Mark la bus, 416 and 418 S. Maple St.
In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen (15) day period is
provided for anyone wishing to appeal their decision. No permit will be issued until this
period has elapsed.