Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4085_001
I Next Ordinance No. 4080 Next Resolution No. 36-89 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE "M/000' A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D B R 0 P B U 8 1 N E 8 8 REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Room, 19t Floor Senior Citizen Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday August 15, 1989 7:30 P. X. Mayor Gerald "Skipow Parley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg III. INVOCATION - Trustee Arthur IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, August 1, 1989 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. PRESENTATION: Governor's Hometown Award B. PRESENTATION: Fire Captain John A. Gibson, upon his retirement after 25 years with the Mount Prospect Fire Department. C. OATHS OF OFFICE: Firefighter/Paramedics Paul Wojcik and William Foehring D. PROCLAMATION: September 2, 1989,•DRIVE FOR LIFE DAY E. 1st reading for Class 11W11 liquor license from Mr. Beef & Pizza, 1796 S. Elmhurst Road (formerly Waterfall Restaurant). A Class "W" liquor license will permit the sale of beer and wine. F. Request from new owners of Alvee's Liquors located in the Mount Prospect Plaza to continue doing business under the existing Class "C" liquor license. The business will operate under the name of Foremost Liquors. (Exhibit A) .F VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 39-V-89, 1813 Maya Lane 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1813 MAYA LANE This ordinance grants a variation to allow a 101 front yard instead of the required 301 in order to locate a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended to grant this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B) B. ZBA 41 -SU -89 and ZBA 42-V-89, Kathcon Subdivision Bonita Lane east of Busse Road 1. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE KATHCON SUBDIVISION This ordinance grants a Special Use to permit garages 750 sq. ft. in size on Lots 2, 3, 5, and 8, lots 1 and 9 650 sq. ft. in size on Lots 1 and 9, rather than the permitted 600 sq. ft. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C) 2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE KATHCON SUBDIVISION This Ordinance grants variations to permit driveway widths of 301 at the garage tapering to 211 at the property line for the property being the subject of the preceeding Ordinance. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit D) IX. NEW BUSINESS A. 1. ZBA 40-V-89, St. Paul Lutheran School, 100 South School Street The Petitioner would like to demolish and and completely rebuild the elementary school which necessitates requests for the following variations: a. To permit an existing accessory building, garage, to remain 81 from the property line instead of the required 10; b. To allow the existing 1,366 sq.ft. parsonage building to remain as an accessory use, instead of the permitted maximum 120 sq. ft.; C. To allow a floor area ration of .40 instead of the maximum .35 permitted; d. To allow a maximum lot coverage of 54% instead of the maximum 45% permitted; e. To allow a 301 building height instead of the permitted 241; f. To allow a 171 exterior side yard instead of the 201 permittted; g. To allow a zero foot exterior side yard instead of the required 201 for a parking lot on the east property line; h. To allow a zero foot rear yard instead of the required 25t for a parking lot; and i. To allow a zero foot setback for a parking lot instead of the required lot. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the requested variations by a vote of 6-0. Request for modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) for St. Paul's School: a. Permit carriage walk within parkways; b. Street lighting be fulfilled through installation of standard Commonwealth Edison equipment; C. Permit parking lot to remain in its existing condition, including omiting required yard; d. Install parkway trees on a replacement basis; and e. Permit impervious surface on Busse Avenue within the parkway to be used as a drop-off driveway. The -an Commission recommends granting the modifications from the Development Code as requested by a vote of 6-2. B. ZBA 43-Z-89, West Kensington, East of Russel The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from B-2 to B-4 to allow P full serve car wash. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying this request by a vote of 6-0. C. ZBA 44 -SU -89 and ZBA 45-V-89, 410 S. Meier Road The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use to allow a fou --car garage and a varation to allow a 980 square foc garage, instead of the 600 square feet permitted, an;. variation to allow a driveway 39 feet in width rat -r than the permitted 21 feet. The Zoning Board Of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. D. ZBA 48-V-89, 1808 Cree Lane The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a 7 foot front yard and one foot side yard in order to provide a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-2. E. 1. ZBA 49-V-89, Amoco oil, Southwest corner Wolf & Euclid The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a revised site plan for the food mart/gas station, in conformance with the newly implemented IDOT floodway requirements and to permit the time period for the previously approved variations to be extended for one year. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. 2. Request for modifications from the Development Code (Chapter 16) to permit a dry detention basin floor slope of not less than 1%; bulding no closer than 50 feet to the detention facility; and, building no closer than 1-1/2 feet from finished floor and floodway limit. The Plan Commission recommended granting the requested modifications from the Development Code by a vote of 8-0. F. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF EQUIPMENT OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance authorizes the disposal of various vehicles and equipment in conjunction with the annual auction conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference. (Exhibit E) G. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE DISPOSAL OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance authorizes the sale of miscellaneous items from the Fire Department at a sale on the 18th of August involving numerous Fire Departments. (Exhibit F) X. VILLAGE XANAGERIS REPORT A. Bid results: 1. Rehabilitation of manholes & sewer 2. Purchase and planting parkway trees 3. Water meter installation & replacement testing contract 4. Forest Avenue water main replacement B. Proposal for consultant for Lincoln Street Bridge Improvement C. Request for authorization to secure dumping privileges and tipping fees at farmers compost pile at a cost not to exceed $16,000. D. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE INSTALLATION OF OPTICOM EQUIPMENT ON RIVER ROAD This Resolution authorizes execution of an Agreement whereby the Village agrees to pay its share of the costs involved with the installation of Opticom equipment on River Road at the intersections of Seminole Lane (Old Willow Road), Euclid Avenue, and Camp Mc Donald Road. (Exhibit G) E. A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS This Resolution authorizes the appropriation of Motor Fuel Tax Funds in the amount of $17,250.00 to cover the Village's share of the installation of Opticom equipment on River Road. (Exhibit H) F. Status Report XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT I August 1, 1989 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:35 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald *'Skip" Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Leo Floros, arrived late Trustee Wattenberg Absent: Trustee George Van Geem INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Corcoran. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, APPROVE MINUTES moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held July 18, 1989. Upon roll call; Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Floros arrived at this point in the meeting. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $ 590,478 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 227 Community Development Block Grant Fund 6,433 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 10,701 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 158,450 Parking System Revenue Fund 42,230 Risk Management Fund 48,637 P.W. Facility Construction Fund A - P.W. Facility Construction Fund B - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 8,757 Special Service Area Const. #5 - Special Service Area Const. #6 - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) 54,307 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) 217,000 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 1,803 Debt Service Funds - Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund 76,597 Police Pension Fund 41,604 Firemen's Pension Fund 46,627 Benefit Trust Fund - $1,303,853 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND ]PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD BOY SCOUT TROOP .Mayor Farleyintroduced Boy Scout Troop 167 in the 167 audience. These young men are in the process of earning their Citizenship Badge. VARIATION; Mr. Halek, 808 Edgewood Lane, stated that he had 808 EDGEWOOD been granted a variation several months ago to construct a 4 -car garage with a driveway 45 feet wide. ;,Mr. Halek stated that the architect had not indicated a decorative wall that extended out from the new garage by -4 feet on the original plan and in order to have a<finished look to the project, he would like to extend the driveway the additional 4 feet to the edge of the decorative wall, which is in place. It was noted' that the variation granted a 45 foot wide driveway and staff could not permit ° the additional 4 feet without going through theprocess of securing an additional variation. Mr. Halek stated that the concrete is scheduled to be poured in the; next few days and the process of obtaining a variation would take 3 months. There was discussion as to whether this request could be considered as a field change, however the Village Manager stated that field changes can only be granted in conjunction' with a Planned Unit Development. It was the consensus of the Board that they had no objection to the additional 4 foot width of the driveway, especially considering the fact that the subject property is a very large lot and the structure is set back from the road_ at least 40 feet, however, the resident should go through the variation process in order to have the 49 foot wide driveway a matter of official record. Mr. stay Fritz; 804 Edgewood,';requested the Board to grant this request, stating that the addition is an asset to the neighborhood. Trustee Arthur, seconded; by Trustee Corcoran, moved to permit Mr. Halek Ito proceed with 'this ;project at the 49footdriveway width at his own risk and that he should file the 'necessary paperwork in order to apply, for a. hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals. Upon roll call: Ayes; Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros', Wattenberg Nays: ;None Motion carried. MAYOR'S REPO CLASS "W" An Ordinance was presented for first reading that ROSATI'S would create one additional Class "W" liquor license 1629 S. BUSSE RD for Rosati's'Pizza, 1629 South Busse Road, and one CLASS 11R11 additional Class "R" liquor license for 'Crossroads CROSSROADS Restaurant, 1800 S. Elmhurst Road. AMEND CH. 19 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved Page 2 - August 1,';1989 . . . . . . . ............. . to waive the rule requiring two readings of an ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Kays: None Motion carried. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ORD.NO. 4079 for passage of Ordinance No. 4079 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Kays: None Motion carried. A request was presented for the creation of a Class "W" liquor license for the Mr. Beef & Pizza, 1796 South Elmhurst Road. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to authorize the creation of a Class "W" liquor license for Mr. Beef & Pizza, 1796 S. Elmhurst Road. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Kays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting of the Village Board on August 15th. OLD BUSINESS None. NEW BUSINESS ZBA 39-V-89, 1813 Maya Lane The Petitioner is request a variation to allow a front yard setback of 10 feet, rather than the required 30 feet, in order to have'a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. It was noted by staff that the subject property has a couple of large spruce trees which will screen this parking pad. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 39-V-89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting on August 15th. Page 3 - August 1, 1989 CLASS "W" LIQUOR LICENSE: MR. BEEF 1796 ELMHURST ZBA 39-V-89 1813 MAYA LN ZBA 41 -SU -89 & ZBA 41 -SU -89 and ZBA 42-V-89, Kathcon subdivision ZBA 42-V-89 Bonita, east of Busse Road The Petitioner is requesting Special Uses to permit to allowgarages on Lots 2, 3, 5 and 8 tobe 750 sq. ft. in size and Lots I and 9 to allow garages 650 sq. ft. in size. Variations are also requested to permit driveway widths of 30 feet on all these lots, rather than the permitted maximum width of 21 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. It was noted that these variations had been granted last year, however, the one year effective date for the variations had expired. This subdivision is currently under construction and the developer is requesting the variations based on the belief that the eventual purchasers will want 3 car garages. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to grant the requests in ZBA 41 -SU -89 and ZBA 42-V-89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Ordinances will be presented for first readings at the next meeting on August 15th, SUBURBAN A Resolution was presented that would authorize the PRIMARY HEALTH the Village to enter into an Agreement for primary CARE PROGRAM health care. It was noted that $13,000 of Community Development Block Grant Funds will be allocated to this program, which will provide health care for those residents with a low to moderate income or for those who do not receive health care services through their employer. RES.NO. 34-89 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution NO.'34-89 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL, INC. PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROGRAM Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. PRIVATE: A request was presented to accept the private IMPROVEMENTS improvements installed in conjunction with the OLD ORCHARD development of Old orchard Colony Country, Phase I. COLONY COUNTRY Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to accept the private improvements installed in conjunction with the old Orchard Colony Country, Phase I. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 4 - August 1, 1989 VILLAGE KANAGERIS REPORT Village manager John Fulton Dixon presented bid BIDS: results. Bids were received for catch basin and inlet repairs as follows: Bidder Amount -rtley Paving & Contracting Corp. $29,052.50 Martam Construction Co. $32,375.00 Ed Pontarelli Construction Co. $62,505.00 Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur'moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low bid submitted by Artley Paving & construction in the amount of $29,052.50 for the catch basin and inlet repairs. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. The following bid results were presented for the purchase of one Halmatro rescue tool: Bidder Amount A.E.C. Fire Equipment $ 8,930.00 Alexis $10,049.58 Halmatro $10,260.00 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to Concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low bid of $8,930.00 submitted by A.E.C. Fire Equipment for the purchase of one Halmatro rescue tool. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Arthur noted that the Mount Prospect Rotary Club is conducting a fund raiser in order to raise the sufficient money to donate a second Halmatro tool to the Fire Department. The following bids were received for the improvement of Prospect Avenue between School and Edward Streets at a width of 31 feet: Bidder Amount Martam Construction Co. $382,810.00 Szabo Paving & Construction Co. $385,092.00 Plots, Inc. $415,656.75 Arrow Road Construction $444,610.35 CATCH BASIN & INLET REPAIR ARTLEY PAVING HALMATRO RESCUE TOOL A. E. C. FIRE EQUIPMENT PROSPECT AVE. IMPROVEMENT There had been discussion at the last Board meeting as to the possibility of improving Prospect Avenue to a width capable of providing parking. Page 5,- August 1, 1989 Chuck Bencic, Director of Inspection 'Services and Engineering,presented drawings showing the configuration of Prospect Avenue at 31 feet with no parking 41 feet with on -street parking and at 51 feet without parking but with a center median. It was the consensus; of, opinion that the option with a'median would not be one of the options. Mr. Bencic stated that approximately 65 spaces would be created if the roadway was improvement to the 41' width. Trustee Corcoran stated that if a parking meter master box was provided and a reasonable fee charged, possibly $1.50, the Village would make money' during the projected 20 year life of the; roadway. Trustee Busse expressed concern relative to providing parking to non-residents and the fact that commuters may not be willing to walk the distance from the parking spaces to the train. It was noted by the administration that the bids presented were based on the '31' width, not the 41' prcp^ssed by the Board. The low bidder had been contacted and he is willing to extend the line items to the 41' width, which would result in the revised amount of $456,240.00. A' representative from Szabo Paving & Construction Company stated that he protests the Village awarding this contract, to Martam due to the fact that the total dollar amount was higher than he bid at the opening. Village Manager Dixon stated that Martam had not included an item in his bid however, when the omission was pointed out to Martam by staff, representatives of Martam "Construction staffed that they would honor the bid at the amount submitted.' MARTAM CONSTR. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to accept ;the bio submitted by Martam Construction in the amount of $456,240.00 for the improvement, of Prospect Avenue at 41 feet wide from School to Edward Streets. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: 'Busse Motion carried. V & G BLDG. Village Manager Dixon noted that the Village has 25-31 S.MAIN ST completed the transaction to; purchase the property commonly known as 25 - 31 South Main Street (presently housing V & G Printers) . Plans are being drawn for the demolition of the buildings and reconfiguration of the municipal lot to provide for the additional parking spaces that will be provided'. ANY OTHER BUSINESS PAUL WATINS Village Manager Dixon presented an item not listed on RETIREMENT the agenda, namely a Resolution regarding Firefighter' BENEFITS Paul Watkins.' Page 6 - August 1, 1989 Mr. Dixon noted that due to -the State of Illinois objecting to Paul Watkins being a member of the Mount Prospect Firemens Pension Fund, because he was over the maximum age of 35 when he became a member of the Pension fund, the Pension Fund Board had voted to remove Paul Watkins from their Pension Fund. In 1978 the Village passed an Ordinance aut prizing the establishment a special account fon depositing the contributions of Paul Watkins, assuring Paul Watkins that the Village would guarantee benefits would be paid to him. The Firemens Pension Board has removed Paul Watkins from the Pension Fund, pursuant to direction of the Village Attorney and State of Illinois, Department of Insurance. An actuarial firm has been retained by the Firemens Pension Board to determine the total contributions of Paul Watkins into the Firemens Pension Fund and computing those amounts, along with the contributions of the Village for Paul Watkins as a member of the Fund, plus interest on those monies. It has been estimated by the actuarial firm that $311,00o would fund the benefits to be paid to Paul Watkins and his beneficiary for approximately 20 years. The proposal is for the Firemens Pension Fund to consider withdrawing that amount from the Pension Fund giving that amount to the Village and the Village depositing those funds in a special account for appropriate distribution to Paul Watkins. A Resolution was presented by the Village Manager which wouldestablish the Village Board's intention to return any monies left in the special Paul Watkins account to the Firemens Pension Fund at such time ars both Paul, and his beneficiary pass away. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved RES.NO. 35-89 for passage of Resolution No. 35-89 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING RETURN OF ANY EXCESS FUNDS IN THE PAUL WATKINS SPECIAL ACCOUNT TO THE MOUNT PROSPECT FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wattenberg requested information as to the status of the law suit dealing with the altercation involving several police officers. Trustee Wattenberg asked if the Village has been sued by the individuals the police were attempting to arrest. Also,, Trustee Wattenberg requested information as to the possible recruitment of Court Watchers. Trustee Corcoran started that he had the opportunity to ride along with a police officer for an entire shift and he: was very impressed by the effectiveness of the Police Department. Page 7 - August 1, 1989 GOVERNOR'S Trustee Busse complimented the Human Service Division, HOMETOWN AWARD; Network 50 program, on receiving the Governors Hometown NETWORK 50 Award. It was noted that Nancy Morgan will be PROGRAM presenting that award to the Village at the August 15th meeting', ADJOURN Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call; Ayes; Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting ;was adjourned at '9:05 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 8 - August 1, 1989 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT July 1, 1989 - July 31, 1989 Fund Revenues Expenses Fund General and Special Revenue Funds Balance June 30, 1989 for July, 1989 for July, 1989 Balance July 31, 1989 General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund $ 2,592,437 $1,090,822 $1,234,543 $ 2,448,711 Community Development Block Grant Fund 910,679 17,450 24,000 24,000 39,811 957,735 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund < 99,747 14,837 9,116 31,963 43,116 < 128,026> Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund 14,029,258 443,302 501,883 551,670 14 ,565 ,13,970,677 44,863 521,372 Risk Management Fund 1,306,291 149,437 108,881 1,346,847 Capital Projects Capital Improvement Repl or Repair Fund Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 655,066 42,599 209,877 487,788 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) < 107,389> 418,060 3,777 2,290 98,783 < 109,679> Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) 216 068 432 323,054 } 217,000 _ Debt Service Funds 1,378,702 172,221 1877964 : 1,362,959 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund _ - - Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund 13,609,159 268-718 38,693 13,839,184 Benefit Trust Funds 15,654,577 293,919 34,378 15,914,118 3,490 _ 3,490 $51,1351766 2 605 9962,771,569 .� $50,970<193 GtNtRAL FUlJU L5T1''AT7U kEill REPORT ACCOUNTli!u pLkli;tt U3 ENOIN-i 7/3i/l39 Pi 19-90 Y-1-0 Y -T -O CUk +,r3 ui)UGET F>Tt MA T;, ACTUAL ACTUAL TAX QLVENUE 56,2110 1-UOu-UO-41, 1 +'J 119 HU PEt-" IT Ft!- l-UUU-00-4102 1-UJU-U()-4uul IAXCi-C UR pIW T.` CrJHRF.Ni 1,41"rs SJlz 1-UOU-0U-4F'J5 PL Ail - KIMINATI "! FF -S 1-UUU-0J-4UJ2 , FAXIS-(_W'Pt:ka 1Pkii)-,. lr T�7•LJ r7 152, 6�3 1-UOU-UO-4Lu;f 1-U00-UO-4UU4 TaXES-";ALGAG. CJKk`;.T I_1Uu17rt LIC`)3SLS 441. 774 130. 9d1 1-U9U-Ur-40:x', F,:XL;-,; A:; GAG. P.�j Ir: �3s, 6UO Ld3, 900 l-UOU-U(1-4114 l-UJu-UU-4Ulu TA K t S-t{U1 „)f+ u;. CURR-NT J ,2U) ".1i. 2Y9 61eTo4 l-U')()-UU-4uii iA%ES-R;1Luk llG PK [UV 14.009 le T4H 1 -UJ --U.-4221 1-UUU-J•,)-4UIJ 1-UUU-UU-4U14 e, [Alt 'JCCUPAiIOrt TA %�_�� iJsQUO 3, UOu 4J ), OJ:) 1364,970 1,208,046 495 '111 > LcS TAx-SPECIAL PAYMNT 'tLV(_t; tt l-UOU-UO-4i.0 IAL'- I NA, It FAX 1-UUU-OU-4U15 t Jkcl:;t, Flkt llvS TAX 21.0005 •;4.4T-: Ll:f VOLICL T•:'.; t-U')O-Uu-4153 1-000-UO-4Ut6 aUTO Ht-NTAL TAX 484 -♦147 ,j ,ijr+R K,tNAL FVO 1-UUU-Uu-40(7 =chL L;TAiE TRA',SFEH TAX 7'13 i7"eUUO 186 1,319 1-uvu-UO-4JL6 i uUt+ t. .tc Vf:Kt GE TAX REVLNU_ i7'500 r-00 63.006 L-OOU-UU-4UZU ill UT +, r' A vt CS TAX 4T1,0,) 118,7,49 131!831 I-uVU-UL'-40`,4 L:t�U SAL P'�Up f,. PL iAK El 1�,0Uu 31090 Z,il 15 1-JUU-UU-4065 "f RS'.J,JAL VRUP REPL RLa 41- uu•3 60.853 TAFAL FAX Hi vF";u, a 5 J. 445 265 35 ;'•UJO 91., 15U 2.727,525 1•718,561 14.667 FEE REVENUE 56,2110 1-UOu-UO-41, 1 +'J 119 HU PEt-" IT Ft!- l-UUU-00-4102 -LtCTRICAL PI[RVIT FE-, L-UUU-UJ-4104 "LON it .,; Pf R"II FEt S 1-UOU-0U-4F'J5 PL Ail - KIMINATI "! FF -S l-UOu-u0-41Jb iTklr_l JPLlll ; t -FLS 1-U00-Uu-41J7 V-IIICL_ LiCE'.Sf FtES 1-UOU-UO-4Lu;f I-- LLL,',S'-S 1-UUU-00-41J9 I_1Uu17rt LIC`)3SLS -t T- 2 3, 34 - 23,347- 1-UUU-00-4114 ^ SL1C I"pt' kF, `,PFCT L4 vS 1-UUU-00-4113 ENTAL Fi LS l-UOU-U(1-4114 t_c 1-d;+A'r,• OF APPtALS l-UUU-U()-4145 _L411L FRI'C'ISc FE,,, 1-UOU-UJ-•-IL0 LL ,Ya FIA C"ISE FEcS 1-UUU-uJ-41i4 _L -VAT -1 117SPLCTLU':, l-U0J-0J-412U '"LS' AL"" fEL, 1 -UJ --U.-4221 ...! :SL=. TV�PRAIL4LSE 1-U0u-uJ-4123 LA'4,)L ll=UIFErvA+dT FLES IJIAL FEE k_Y '111 FNTE4GUvIs4NME NTAL 'tLV(_t; tt l-UOU-UO-4i.0 IAL'- I NA, It FAX 1 -U0„ -UJ -4151 41AIE ':ALrS IAX 1-UUU-U+1-41,2 •;4.4T-: Ll:f VOLICL T•:'.; t-U')O-Uu-4153 4A iT-;TAT!: i(sf75 484 I-ODU-UO-4155 ,j ,ijr+R K,tNAL FVO 1-0UU-U0-4i`+6 rl",I C ON, N), -AA . FS t-UUU-Uu-4L54 +L[L k.i I?c l Mi,liv SF M, 4TS FJTAL FNFL:'u_V: `(4M_• T..L K VL :,U: INTERGUVFRNMENTAL REVLNU_ l-UUO-VU-4165 ,L, YCLI,VG GfIAI I 47.195 247 "39.799 45N 2U.43 74 36,604 4J,292 176 o85:6a,, UNREC•0 HAL A NCE 1,41U.Su0- i,636.118- 7is, 6U0- 171,436- 11,OU0- Itr5U5- 4.Zitr954- 23,000- 569 46,974- 343,169- 12,000- 60, 853 265 1 +1, 589- VAUt I x HAL ANLE UAL L,4t0,500- 1UU- L, 4311, 118- 93- 735,600- !00- 771,436- 93- 1t,000- 100- 11005- 96- 4,211,954- 77- 0 23,000- 100- 569 T6 86,994- 58- 343,169- TZ- 12,000- too - 60.853 0 Z65 0 9,191,589- 10- 2_ „ out) 56,2110 132.960 35,871 *S •Out -i 11, 25C [1,653 i .5 7 L 'e 92,040- 41- 3f+, OUO 7e500 13, tl82 2,867 -t T- 2 3, 34 - 23,347- 52- 4+.OU0 11,2501ntlt8- 20:456 528 16, 118- 54- e,9+70 249 ZJO150 +; 4e 144- 24,544- 55- 71-,Uuf) l«3,750 91.000 IT,40! HUU- UUO- 80- L't i0't 3,123 931 II5 -43r 192- 643,192- 88- Et r,5n0 i(sf75 484 5 .g55 (1,569- (1,569- 93- 27 ,0 of c 7, 5u0 103, 354 5,7865.5t1- 5,511- 4- 7'.Ou{7 t7, 499 41, 16Z 401 ,7 lSa,.S41- 16604!- 6Z- r,9uU 1,725�Y,d38- 9,345 Z,il 15 211.33@- 41- uu•3 3,750 2,704 a 5 J. 445 2,445 35 ;'•UJO 7. Soo 14,667 14.667 12,296- 12.296- 8Z- 9?r0u0 5r 12. .lU 22:438 7,48167,1,62- 15,333- 15,333- 51- I' '09" 3, UUL) 5,305 1sI5i 67,562- 75- 1.5"0 1,H75 1,435 525 6'695- 6,695- 56- 1I.,t0U0 36,249 31#435 I1,`527 6.065- 6,065- 81- 001) 9,9'49 LO,UTT 413 I10,951- 11 0.952- 77- f) 4tH! 476,444 666,414 l2'e564 _ 1(,9,'3- 11,923- 3G- 1.240,90(- 65- t.ST tt')u0 3V-499 513,559 15",4lti 1JI.OiU1,056 14.99Y 24,166 `+.417 t x441- 1.050,441- 67- ,GO0 4.940 75, tF 14- 759834- 16- 1'rJuJ 4, 500 ZO,ODU- 20,000- lJ0- 550 L. ?4 IF, 137 20 18009- 18,000- 100- ('-, UUU 3,999 4,+363- 4,863- 97- t<'eU00 3,"'-70 1,667 4t7 16,0u0- 16,000- lUU- TU, 331- 10,333- 86- 1,71,,UuO 435.243 539,529 163,282 1.201,471-0 1,201,471- 69- Z[,SOO 22, 560 22,500 U t S I I M A I f D dEVI=JUE RIV'IRI ACCOUNTI IG PER1118 03 ENVIV, 7131/19 MOTOR FUEL TAX E:: J`) IhTERGJVt HNMl,''JAL RLV-4,) 1914-nt Y -T -O Y -T -O CUF 113 U+grSC •O _.111 .J*, ��3 21.899 225.235 75,969 31. 3U) T. SUU 3.430 3,'+33 Z GONERAt P;1JU 22-J0u-U.l-4 tui OrcT tyTI MA T, ALTUAL ACTUAL RAL AIll CC BALANCE 'IAL I W IFER L,UVt R NML �4f AL tVLtuO 1-UC3J-UJ-4161 PLXS11".'L Fac JP '�I PL IAL t7 s7U.; i7.9:F I-UJU-UJ-4155 L I'c.t`,.I..t.L VAOP gLPL RK '.5110 6l4 155s70C- 155,706- l0U- IiNTE.tGOV LR hMt'i1aL R>:VtNUt 1 1` 1, 2U;J 2Z, 5JU 2,700- 2,500- too - ii", 70U- 135,700- 86 - SERVICE CHARbL- REV*NUL L -UUP -Ju -4177 1-UOJ-()0-4130 ,. G ", i'1:V ICF C44€::, :rt)ULAt,Ct T1.�'SP;+T fE!= 11 ,0J) •r 3, 749 35, Ot10 IT,`. CJ 1411,900- 140,000- HO- TOTAL ' LKV1LL L,J,LA , cVI_`ILI 43.030 LJ •.000 7,999 12,063 r, 7H8 27,937- 27.937- 70 - 51.741+ 47,063 21,1138 167. t, 7- tbT.937- to - PARKING HL-VE'JJI_ i-OOu-J7 -4cto I-UJU-U-t-r:17 r i I,, - LIC AL 1't'._". - Lt:4liJlt C11IItT 111.9J1) 51,494 3H, 513 11.521 41 e481- al e4B2- 70- I-0UU-U;J-42Is I1vES - LOCAL "RDINANLES If t, OCU 1,000 .5, 0(' 249 X3,966 1,159 156,1)14- 156.034- 87- T!14L PARK tau V V tit .Juu 77,7.9 100 bZ. 764 19.5811 900- 24H.41 b- 900- 24P,416- 4U- 80 - OTHER REL',-'2UE i-J;'U-(1U-4231 14L 1:. ,T C-JnF -ii IRS _,7"') 4iS 503 23u 1.147- L-JUU-UU-4135 .cLCYL-It.t: INLU'JE _ ,not) 12.4'18 1,734 1,734 1e247- 71- t-UOU-UU-4243 JIj, C, it k- Ht.VF'J:;I ,OJ+' 1,248 1.030 48.'66- 473,266- 97- L-UJU-UU-4c4v .'ILIAL P` IATL 4LV,.Jc 1 x000 2.479 1.725 1.123 3,W1- 3.920- 7H- L-UUC-uv -4ch7 F Vtt` "t."PUP,_- CY t-1,16:1 2. 4vi4 3r71t€ L?J 7,275- 7.275- 73- L-UOU-U)-4246 L-lU'4",L INt, 33,00+:; 9,2`10 5,143 ..282- 6.282- 63- 1-UUU-UJ-vc47 Put I[- }; E1Rt uf1't:..T 1.,001) 3.030 3, ('15 933 27.417- Z7, BI 7- 84- i-vuJ-U3-4c':a .T ER. yI LNC 13:"1# 1^,dSCt"_L,rNL+J1J5 L:�,U•)0 14,9':13 6S.OU8 18,967 B.4r7- 74,492- B,9N5- 75- I-UUJ-U,1-4 41 1NtU re 3 .Ouo 7.500 6.091 1,400 23.909- 14,992- 54- L-6UU-UU-42 rI .1..'1T 1ITT -'"'S7 €ISTI,I'OTti 1',,00,' 6,,'49 7,372 Z.d53 23,909- 80- t-UUU-Ur_-4273 I St>_yI - Eli t: %.'1i �I)' U r 03 Ld,7512 23,065 10,335 17,6Lt- 17.628- 71- 1-000-00-4c57 110,111 LUANS INTI. RLSI s4JO 5,3413 5,772 1,489 51.935- 51.935- 69- 1-UJU-U0-4256 I Lvuil t.;Jb N, 1r;1 -C IPAL ,I.7U13 12,9,'4 28,740 12.331 15,618- 15,628- 73- 1-U00-UU-42D2 'Ihi-.+T. Jf ST•I' +iyY,. 4',`+Ju L0. o, 3 21,268 21,Zb'*. 22,960- 22.960- 4§- L-UUU-UL -4::.4 .tit:'t - CLt,T"AL PL1At, 5:. 6.1J t 1.650 59,643 1+':252' 20,232- 48- L-ODU-UU-4Z1U TK All', ERE)"I Tr:UST ACCTS 5,045 5,043 9 1-UU(I-UO-4011 311. 1'13 - M V L Ui- AR Y 0 1-UUu-uO-4213 ., u;=Vn1LLANCt 111-Vp'41)_ U 1-UUU-U0J-4,:16 ,:,r J.E�J C:_1ST- L+N;:1:; I ,IJ )�? ...150.1 t„2.9 17.798 t6- 7,202- 7.2112- 0 1-JU-kJ-4:16 C:a-'RL, R .;, €7.,<:_ ;,7 .1'LT 12,498 9,778 29- 1-UUu-U�1-4171 t 1, E I '.I :1 :vi', Pe ),.1•A~ I..0"M 2.4"14 5,570 2.74J 4U. 222- 40.2Z2- 80- 1-UUU-G9-4299 „ Ii:R41 CL,Ae1'J,. ACLIIONI 4,330- 4.330- 43- TJIAL Ulif- , Vz 1:1€' 'i+ ,9�1) 151, 718 169.103 77.111 377,707- 377,7P. 7- 4H- TUTAL GL'IEJAL �Ui; ------------------------------------------ ;,y.i+,730 3,472,315 :!.325,819 I.U90,112,: 12.763,41t1- 12.563.8111- 2L3 - MOTOR FUEL TAX E:: J`) IhTERGJVt HNMl,''JAL RLV-4,) 22-v'J u -UJ -41' 1 22-U0O-U:I-52v: 22-UJU-UU-.045 1 1 ;ALL JCAS I ._IrI.;J! S`:13T !Ir, HP:J)'LTS -. `:1M”. ISt ,t -ME^JT I:E"J EJ 0 _.111 .J*, ��3 21.899 225.235 75,969 31. 3U) T. SUU 3.430 3,'+33 71,0, 3.,5- 706.365- 26,170- T6- 07- 22-J0u-U.l-4 T CNIL '^C-,400 7,'u tt; it', 410 6r,6' J, 4t,q_ 9,9214- U 35- ` 30"1914 kSTI'AI(,) kEVt•)U, kEP URT TAX RLVL.J, ACCOUNrt It; Pt f l" 1 05 ENUIN,; 7/31/ i4 ',.. 1`1,!9 -?J R -.J OGtT Y -T -O Y -T -D CU' '10 fill AE tr, TEnUu 4'_p.t'i n5,499 tSTJMATL ACTUAL ACTUAL E'K�Vr_r, Ui 94').00-) 24 1, 497 247.4t,1 13.048 TUTnL M.Lr UR `UEL TAY ': :f .^e is 24-UUU-ut'-4164 1•1_p_Sr)4AL Pkr1P R TAX 13,061 "Vf EKGUVURNMI- 4FAL k..Vt•:il-- 400167 --------_ 90t,, 247.497 147 r4 UL Aoei67 COMMUNITY LEYLP)iy i.LtttK ';KANT 7. 327 24-ODU-UU-4225 f, AH' F}.1. F', 111, .f--4. f UN(? 24-UUU-O'J-4,,a INTL260VLKNWNTAL fiLV, i"tTLk,ST INC'!'4E VITAL IN11:W U,.`, T -A tS' fUt ZS-Ut1U_,rU_417i :.U'', r,",.tf 150 60t) 150 23-000-UO-4z1L r.,)b,<AH INT U'^E , 95c' F28, �•i5 6u.UC0 24 ,7241 iNTL,. ,jY �, r,Mc .f At R Yf:.f Ut L -e Q30J 7. 499 f, 406 rtt0u TUIAL CU`SMIh[FY ')E'VL"MT 5.. ,`45') lite 444 68.4U6 24,000 1L'ICK t,�'ANT5:`.950 ------------------------------------------ 13t,444 68.406 24,000 ILL. MUNICIPAL H=I 1k-4FNT FU"0 30"1914 - 39-U.u-U.)-401;1 t.:Xl ;, IfrE - "Al:li f 1`Ei^,ttk TAX RLVL.J, 46,24'3 39-UO0-uo_U3! 11X. 1 .'.)kA:,CL C AUDIT 24-UO0-UJ-4W3�, T XrCOk it, "14 T)rAL T„X „_v -S Z4-UJU-U1-4056 TtxtE - Ft-:I'I" t4 i, 90+1 12, 223 24-UUO-00-4064 Pf t: ;. �,t`fAt Pk UP f(t PL TAX 2, OU,) n5,499 FIFAL IAX K V.-. tU;, 39-000-00-4177 STnif :;Pavy `t ', 404 12 T, 722 INTEk GOVERNWNTAL ALVE-',U, 13.048 ` 24-UUU-ut'-4164 1•1_p_Sr)4AL Pkr1P R TAX 13,061 "Vf EKGUVURNMI- 4FAL k..Vt•:il-- -PL Fdt AI l:1 FC k..,}.�K)4M NIA C k<'YE`+U! 45. o0u, L1t250 45.000 tlrC>tl INTERFUNO TRANSFt RS 7. 327 24-ODU-UU-4225 f, AH' F}.1. F', 111, .f--4. f UN(? 24-UUU-O'J-4,,a i"tTLk,ST INC'!'4E VITAL IN11:W U,.`, T -A tS' 600 150 60t) 150 TOTAL ILL. MJNo�fIi(-AL TlM aT f:JVJ -------- ---------------------------- 5""su0 Ls'.Iz2 LIORARY FJNU TAX 't tVEg4c S9-UUU-0�1-4031 T.X - LI",. ikY `ti'.VICF s1e4^. '.e4<:U 39-U.IU-uo-4u3r T.IX_S 30"1914 - 39-U.u-U.)-401;1 t.:Xl ;, IfrE - "Al:li f 1`Ei^,ttk Iu',.3uu 46,24'3 39-UO0-uo_U3! 11X. 1 .'.)kA:,CL C AUDIT 127.;tr.? it, "14 T)rAL T„X „_v -S ._ ,12' 7,211 I, �U"40t 4i1, 344 F NT EF GUYI. ni M::NTAL dtV.:'rU' 39-000-00-4177 STnif :;Pavy FATAL P;4 TktiGJ�: ;''!fAt K_V'�:U�. 5,.201 13.048 ` 'L*240 13,061 "Vf EKGUVURNMI- 4FAL k..Vt•:il-- 39-UOU-U0-4 Io4 r {S()fAL rz- s!P 's.P L TAX 211 SOti 7. 327 L9,418 14,837 19,418 14eti37 20 2u 19,41:1 1 I UNREC•0 TIALANCE 7421, 5 t 9- 742. 5 L 9- 45 .950- l.594- 457,544- 457,544- 240: 900- 242,542- 491.462_ 45.OJO- 45.0.70- 1,401,9vo- 131.000- 127,300- 2'), 12U- 1.PO5.4()O- 52,2140- 52,z`iG- z'+e 3UU- V AW: 3 s BALANCE BAL 742.519- 75- 742,519- 75- 455.950- 88- 1.594- L6- 457.544- 87- 457.544- dT- 248,900- t00- 242.582- 93- 0 491,482- 96- 45.000- LJO- 45.OU0- too - 0 580- 97- 580- 91- 537.062- 97- L, 463, 9b 0- 100- 185,000- too- 127,300- LOO- 29,120- l0O- L,P05,400- t00- 52,280- IOU- 52,280- 100- 2'4,300- 100- I STI• AI, a {:EVt:.It r k1Pp„f ACCI)JNTI .l, P;"P1 I, U3 FNO1N: 71311'19 11'14-v0 '3IUr.N Y -T -C Y - T -U CU:: "0 UNR C{'U L t;4kAkY FUVU C: , tJ diATi AL TUAL ACTUAL "AI-Ar{Lr. t JALANCE IAL I )TAL "T" r+b UV—t',ML'JAL F.r VL, Ul- < .3UU 1. 3,3 3 PARKIN(, -t V1'IUr 24,3UU- Z7,J00- IOC - 39-01U-UU-4L 6 1'i L -t. A v0 I F : 1.00•-� 9.9-34 34-UJU-UU-4,I,d i -. ,I IN(-, 4:$000 )")49 '100- 40,000- J 9- UUU-UJ- 4.! 5 , .'T i;_,, :731 u,, ZS'•41t hie 1115 4).000 40,000- TJO- T.rIAI PAkv, I r< V ,,. ia.'s41J �)i. lu3 252.42.0- 257.420- 100- TOTAL L1 . �.Ar.Y FU ,� 332,420- 332.410- 1.00- --__----_________________2,21'1.400- ,.tt-'e4?i) h}4•d1N __>_________ - - __- o Z.11 ,400- 100- MATtil 6 SLWtP. FU7-) TAX -LVL+u'� 41-UJ0-u,-4-1'1 T. X, k'NT i3'. LO') 1'z 3. 0"4 4i-u7J-U'--u I ,Xi - P".Irl•' i7',M1D�� Z18.4U�� 54,237 712•"00- 732.100- 1UO- 41-000-O)-alli -'dIk I-rSPr. L?i'L: FF:S _ •000 5.249 11.189 34.-23 819,363- 819.363- 94- 11TAL IAA r... Jt rt;� .770 4,7,v T3 65.4.:6 2.1H5 11,IILI-55- 41,LOR t,56'1.274- 411,15.214- yb- TNTEvGUYt +tNMt 4TH" 41-UUU-U,-4151-.-nr,�T - t' �. 't^-� '-T'. 11,J 143.0"5 41-UUt,-3,_4Z;1 .,41; SqL-+- A—I-100 912.000 941.772 '+72.100- 572,100- 100- 41-U'+U-WJ-4Z.JZ ', t ; t S ['1_OALIILS - .OJO 7, 99. 88.775 401,804 2, 7J6. ZZd- 2.106.2214- 74- 41-Ui)u-U,)-4ZJ3 .J.It '.OJ) 12,4IV 11,079 2'11b6i 263,775- 263.225- TS - 41-14`30-UJ-vcJ4 1, Tr! SAL_, •.;,).},) 4.9"1`i 9,72 7.u35 3:•921- 3ZeYZ l- 6b - 41-UJ1i-vU-4 J 5 d,iTr-, i. IL 4' T.ii'S .lut 16.14,, 64,877 S.nti 10.3Z9- IO.32tl- 52- 4t-UJU-U1)-"ZU6 :U -t,T i. A')i3 t� SFW. :t r,,Uur} 6•Zay 16.Y03 103- t03- 0 i)TAL iN1 Laq; vt' ,_.-x.-M�":i:U-L'+3,J17 ,,130.545 8.350 3,8n4 362.827 1•,•1,50_ 16,650- '.60T,S55- 3,•501.555- 76- 1NTEPE0^.,t Tl:.q t, St_kS 41-J'J()-U)-4,1I I,.dr.Sr; .: Fr J'^ S.,A- 41-uUU-UU-4241 ,L) i0l.. i+I T'. T•k ;CE, pS 0 41-uuv-U^)-``>z4i J>`IA - 14,JUrc`•LMi NT; �'. JJr; y'+H U 4i-u7U-U,-4441 a.Tl:: "";T INL6,mf 41-r)7v-u'3-4c4) lv r.6t3J ,. .tr Iti'J 6,JU 65,135 3Z.ili 1".320- 19,320- 97- 4iLLL',4'4,-jW, 41-UUU-UU-4.c� •�'+,) 4.938 8,802 .15•s IY,46S- 139, 4b 5- 68- �,.L� it PbJ;P. <Tf S .OU'' 13. Tao 11.198_ 11,198- Sb- 41-vUU-UJ-'r Z;34 '.; ativl L'+�S '—Li - JF ASSTS 55.000- 55,000- 100- 41-Uuu-uv-4Z,u -,ATN 0'1 '—Lc or IAVL-ST. 41-UOv-UTJ-4[ 14 •LULL JP,_w; LLY!Tr i'tUT OIN 0 41-vi)J-.}.-4c31 .•:AT - LLrn,ii ,6 1CL"uI:T O G T:7TA1 1•IT r,cF u'r .r T{. A`1;t LnS ZT'•6u+' 74, °`%S 74,6170 311, •r67 224.98 t- 214,983- 75- TUTAL WATER G �;_ - F ----------------------- - 443, 101 S r39ts3t2- -_ 5.341,-12- dl - PARKING SYSTi j !'.' VI..)UL FtE '3tVfN:JL 9"0 • E) 1 , 410- L .4Z 0- 67- I SIl"AtI j FFVcr'U' ktuURT? ACc1UN11^, VIP[ 1i U3 Ctl;}(N, f 311;'4 i v''9 -'b Y -T -D Y -T -I` CUn "U UGR^C-O VAkK(fv,• SYS1rM K Vi lUt tUr.+? �'IDStT t',TI MA`TL A! TUAL ACI UAL I%AL A•ICE BALANCE HAL+ TUTAL FtL tcV, ,'1'_ f. "1 7,_U 4Sd 4R+i 1.410- 1s920- PARK[NG 3CYL JUc 46-UUU-JV-4[11 t, T1 K ".ULL' CI 11)*- UNIT C1 U.'.OJf• 10.494 46-Ut)rt-UG-4ci2 a, Tc4 .:.;LL CT Ir)IT F;4- .},f0 2U. 357 ..687 1.1.643- 61.643- 75- ..'ACL 01 r 7 wl LL. ST.LJT ..OJO '.450 lS. 449 49 4.34'7 57.50 L- 5 0:501- 1`7- 46-JJu-U.;-vw _RK I � ^-_ �TUUY Fr I I[' 1 >. UJt) ie T5V 1.450 L e3.) 7.650- 7s650- 80- 46-JJU-Uc-v14a 1 .rF''•_;T 1NLt"+j 14.?ZO 1.63(l 5.460 15.U[t0- 15.000- lU0- tUTAL ,'AkKIlG cV � 11 1;17.1cO -,6.779 43.2-',6 I.J2 9, U61)- 4:060- 62- 14.08. 141,1154- t43.854- 77- TIIjAL PARKING SK:L., •,. • V:='t1 j`it1r 0)i, 47.494 §4 Z26 ------------ - s 14.566 145.774- 145.774- 71- 1-RISK R I SKMANAUEMt,if I iH+U SET'VICi- C11AW;t ;it Vt•4UL 4Y-U7U-Jv-vlJ., -'t' -,A fit''U 0f_RGF1 i• t77.239 169.307 215.458 49 -00.; -JJ -4177 liAT,-,-. I U`:U LIIAIK,FS'[61.772- 1t2sG�J 43.149 107.729 461.TTZ- 80- 4Y-UUu-Jf-v 17d ;'AkK(..i. FU':U C`IAk t;iS T.300 825 34.520 17.260 l3k.tth0- t38. U8U- 90- ►rIAL �c nY ll:c _HAS?.. v_V c'U l*2', '.13, 113.141 6b0 250.63.9 334-1 !.940- 1.640- BO - S l2 .319 1.002.4`'2- 1.JUZ,492- 80- 1NTtKTUi$? Ika`.>F��".S 49-VJJ-U`I-4 4�9 1YA v; T-, F.. € `.t 't. FUN" 49 -0=1U -UG -4116 +A=•#,F=,2 f"It'r .t3Tc,F FUi40 U 49-UV0-UU-4;.'7 1•-A'.ai',;=_ Few PkftftG fc)Nl) U 44 cr,iv-Uo-4c't1 ,+L43vo L'.+.=TCI OJItJ S 4Y-U.l U-UU-42§e T1^tS ,'>.000 17.250 12.H92 2.74u ib:l0�- 0 t W[ I JI I1'=1', 49-UUU-01-4243 r.t�;it .i tY t,Jt1 II=T L=a...} 1`.0,)11 !),499 IH.278 9.204) Si.722- 56.10ti- 53. 722- 31- 49-010-00-414•+ fi iLU"P L+,;Ak! V11'l-- a ()uJ "� t. 17,250 I9, 7I4 2.105 49.21'1- 49.281- 6b- 71- 4Y-,r€)U-U}-§Ivy -, t.':+t= s"MI x,i.'r93- FS .=)Ul' 1.578 ".244 4-.941 607 4.443- 71 - 44-UOU-uJ-4<4[i l .Y'.>T'tt 11 !Nt I"t= .t .r37U r1. 750 v.941 21.9,_4 2n:059_ ?O.U5,9- 80- 49-UJJ-UU-42,1 T , t!•;CT - •, .. >.5u0 L:344 65.1176- 75- I:TAL INIEnI U'k, I A'.S) _ Iv3.5[0 hi. 950 N4. 51?I Z4+11R 5.tiJ0- 5.500- 130- 2`'4.'39- 2Sv .239- 14- 4- Ti,tAt 'tLSK MANAt, 14�ljf . ,J. - 1.5+ .4S(' ______________________ ------------------------------------------ I;l.231 340.211 14'3.437 -- 1.256.731- 1.1461731- 79 - CAPITAL I,lPhV. 6 ki_PL. tllrV, TAX .ALVLNUE 51-UJ.,-UJ-4u1b T•..t+ - Cl;tk,,o I7•.4J'f 51-000-V�-vt.t 7 r.,a t-' P= €'' 233. 9U0 v4.t,5G •, y. 4r 3 17. 3i 7 111,400- 179.400- lUU- TJ74L TAX of Y_;Ur 41 >,�3i)� 1=!3.34-3 17.347 13.24,t 2Ih.563- 216`563- 43- 13.24-I 39 li.9f, 3- 345.463- 96- INTERFUrHf TKAnSt�r;S 51-UUU-UJ-12?6 I A, - � ILtU AL 'x :) 0uft .e '4f9 SL-JUu-U')-424a f ,tit _: Ti iflL' c 3�.0uJ /. ipt3 LS+.UUO- 150.000- 1V0- S/-uJu-Jt-v262 }F ,•=LL +ta, F 11PM. i7 15. 3?9 .:145 L4.661- 14.661- 49- 51-JUu-G0-4263 , LL 0' P.l, t_!•J 1 PMclif i•r:)J" ,c4 3. TSU !5 )0- . 2.400- 100- IS.Ju0- 15. GU V- 100- c:STI"AIi.:.1 PcVI_t lit F'1: floki ++LCOUNTI i:; PLRIt U U3 rN1)I'i,; 7131/19 i90 9-+U Y - T - O -T-V Cu, 40 +i)OC rT 1,Tl-+ T,_ AL TUAt atTUAt C AV [)al 1.IP kV. t ..tIL, r=iJa!' 1NTE°FU;4U )VA•ASF—RS 5I-uUJ-UJ-421,•, ,AL, If PJL I'- 1 , %, I V Nc 141 , 300 ).999 Si-uOil-uU-42oI .It V,_L-=F . t:X-Ttt). •+. Ct)0 24.000 4b,L10 51-u0J-u0-42c+, 11,11+IUAL S')CI tTY 1);,T.A 21.000 1,500 7,453 TOTAL I41IL—") .5yll 115,072 68.982 TOTAL CA?IYAL [i":V. L 0 PC. F I ! 0 ------------------------------------------ nT .dvO 21 J, 1'75 a6. 319 COk POkATt PU;tPJS,. s i ). 9 IttPvV OTIiER aLVtNbl S3-OOJ-00-.,., '. 11 JOS-St 9It-S A I,U', ,OU:) 2•,4,944 53-UJU-UJ-4241 ,-LL A` I J`D,-S3=RI; S is 501 .000 53-L•0U-0:1-4143 t .Ttt:. ST INC )ME 4'.000 9.9?9 TOTAL OTtitk 3 Vt."p), 1,'s4 ,JUO 384,996 T(JT-L LLVV,4141c 'OAPiJ,{ � W9 l 1pkv --------------------`--------------------- I '- ..)JJ 3,14.996 (lOWNTUWN REOLVLP'1T L 1R7,1 1187 OTHER r4cVLNUL 54-0,,u-U(i-41'2=f 1,TL.l aT tN{.'"'1 '.5•)U t,'7S 4,238 T_,TAL ILNU 7.590 1,.;75 4.238 TOTAL OOWNIUdy k -c VLPVI LUJ` T i'+J7 ------------------------------------------ T,,JO 1,'175 4,238 UOWNTLJWN R,VtVLP'T LJ=.';T L9a' FEE yLVL%J, 55 -JOU -00-4113 lTAL iNC'itir ), OUl) Z, 25u 2,1522 55-OUO-UJ-414i r:I y:`J, MTN NIS 55 -0J1, -LJ -4144 1.TLi `_I INCt)t% +.000 4.9°%3 9.674 55-,)UU-01-41(,6 ,,,Lt )F P,,- P, kTY 5S-JOU-Uu- 1:"7 ILVLkjV l`T'AT 1111,5 [)IAL HE 1;_Y:'.JL Ju)t 7, 24e 12,124 TOTAL OUWNTO,�J ,_VL-. l :. :-•T t•tr;5 ------------------------------------------ ,u,J), 7,2,9 12,124 P W I-ACILITY CJ'v,t L9;.7A OTHER Rt -V '1U' S6-JUu-UU-42°,Z :,ALL �;l= t+li `;US 56-UOO-JJ-4241 i Tt , ST t'ILClE 11.773 7,, 33 29,351 42,599 932 932 932 75J 3,027 3.777 1,777 t111 ANC t- 4 te000- 49.790- Z2r567- 394,914- I?U,4at- ! e00�,;JUO- SUO:OuG- 4'•,OJr}- 1,54 .JUG - 1 , 54�..00U- 6,750- 10,126- 16.'i76- IL,87F- x BALANCE nAL 40.000- 100- 49.790- 52- 22.567- 75- 394,518- 65- 790.481- 90- t,000,0UJ- 100- 500.000- t00- 40,000- 100- 1,S40,000- 100- 1,540.000- 100- 3,262- 43- 3.262- 43- 3,262- 43- 6.750- 75- 0 tU.IZ6- 51- 0 0 16.876- 56- 16..76- 58- 0 0 T If AL JTHER kt Vr%11� TUTAL P 6 FAZILITY L!)yST 1'Jd7A ------------------------------------------ P M FACILITY CiJNv T 24,71, INTE'tFUNU TKA tSF iKS 57-UQU-07-4217 f4AH.F1 �. F,t Oti CIRR FU+tU 57-0tJQ-U3-424J 1`J LR". STINC{)ME TUTAL tNItRFU'�U TfZ'%4SI_LF'1 TUTAL P n FAC. ILITY LIJ"SI 1`+67;, ------------------------------------------ SSA :!5 LAKL MILT. WATIJ, TAX REYE l,JL 5b-uOJ-uJ .uI'1 S,.X[S - CURE_ tj 5it-JUU-UJ-41:20 IAXL1, - P,t1"n, 56-ODU-UJ-424d I lTLh- ST INCt;;aE T JFAL TAX R_Vi .tie TI,TAL SSA P5 UJN" F. LAKL MICH. "ATI-, ------------------------------------------ GEUKGEIAL9t KF C"J�lST. FUND OTHEk REVENUL 59-UQU-00-4g-v2 `,ALL .JF lb 10, -SSA 59-UUC-U7-424J i,,TLT?i. ST INLI ilL F JTAL 01 Ht R: 4cttUt TUTAL UEORGt/ALJ �aT C'P+ST.------------------------------------------ F7<ttt CORPURAIL PU'iPdl':S ;t E 1 11473 TAX KLVt ill, bU-UJJ-U,-4W i T X- XI 6STi"ATt C1 FFV -`,U= FtYOKT ACC''tM4r1'tt. PIRiOO U} ENWN 723ttt!q F J,s9-+0 Y -T -U Y -T-1) CU" "O t)NRIC.Tt u106tT F:',T[4ATT ACTUAL ACTUAL ❑Al.ANCF BALANCE OAL 0 0 0 U 0 0 0 0 0 U U 0 U O 0 - 6U-UUu-u -4LrJ IxXL., - CUP,.` " Ph T,,,,' 1"'61)) +'t,2J0 i=1r1�L t7, 291' 72,600- 72,600- 100- bU-UJi+-JU-4U64 ^t.2 `,:P IAL Pt UR RLL fAX P 5,119 }.l19 64.UF1- 64.071- 43- F': TAL tAX Kt VL ,'lc 141 ,"J7}5. 4aH Ss S19 ie'T t4 0 11v7E2G%JYcRilT4 JAL 4LVc:tU`. L}.:,e6Tt- !76,671- 96- 6U-UiJU-UJ-i16-r "t'i x BALANCE .IAL 149.033- 95- 97.300- lUO- 117.396- 93- 214,696- 96- 7.200- 100- 14.230- 71- 21,430- 79- 236.t26- 94- 11:3(,0- 100- 11.133- lUU- 1.835- 67- 24.268- 96- ?4.268- 96- 15,200- LUO- 16 470- H9- t,850- 69- 33,520- 72- 33.520- 92- 35.()00- t00- 35. UUO- lot)- 35,000- t0U- r SII'IA T1J R Vi IOF kEPUBT ACCt)UNTI.df. P=R1UU 03 E.'90IN6 7131/49 iv 19-)U Y-T-L Y-T-O CUl MO TUTAL LUK PIMA tt Pfk P '��� ti G I I')13 t''IOG cT LSTI MAIL. ACTUAL ACTUAL UW EC'U 0ALA4CE -------- 1i1.zoo 31,297 8s 6 ,azo CORPORATE PLR?USI S ,: L, I 074 TAX iLVLtVUL 6t-UUU-UJ-4u21 Tx,(tS - L')kki NT "'.300 24.314 6t-000-O.,-4123 InXL1 - w,.l t+ Il.,,800 31,64'1 47e30U- 61-UUU-Uo-4U6•, '-PSOYAL V UP K:_PL TAX 9.404 7:L&:� i17,396- T.;IAL TAX ,LV+-_-jU, 2�0 , 100 56,022 9,404 7,185 214.fi96- INIEKGOVFk11ML,.tAL KcVL4Ut 61-U0U-U0-41b4 ;'_tSU.JAL P4UP R PL TAX 7,200 1.8UU 61-UUU-UU-124d I-IL,ST It'N_ilcE 'lUU 4,4sB 7.2u0- TJiAL tf4TtFKUIJV.;'1601141FAL R,VE4Uc ' '1.200 5.T7O 1.695 14.230- 6,778 5.770 1,b95 21.430- TUTAL CUPP0I,41t ruk R.,S: i L 1 1974 ., ------------------------------------------ L51. 300 +2,820 15,174 9,981 Z3bs126- SSA 81 P:a USPECT !;_AORt,S ;� L TAX ticVL'4UV 62-UUU-uj-4022 1,Xts - CORR, Ij it.3JJ 1.1'23 b2-UU0-U�-4ut6 TAXIS - Pr 11)' II.I G 2.T8711,300- 6Z-U0u-0J-424/ I.i'. "d;.>T 1:C E).=€ '.750 6r17 TJTAL TAX Ki y�-a1J_ 2S,2Uh q17 174 1.935- 6.297 932 274 24,z68- TUTAL-SSA .11 Pa U1I't LT 4t-AU-IrrS :' G I --------------- _ ------ < ,2•.+'; .,.297 932 Z71, 24,268- SSA I:2 BLACIIHAdK 6 L 1 TAX RLVENIUL 63-UJU-00-4U24 )AXLS - CUKR,f;T t.... Zu" i, 798 Pxl:); 1-.b0'; 4,6502 L3U 15,200- 63-0 u;:-Uu-wt4a l -T t_.: �) INL'1 AE : I,')93 t^ 470- TJIAL TAX ;i,V.-.), 1�.5UU 1.15 113 85C 1.9j0 9 1,850- �.152 31,520- SSA �^L ,iL F."vIArtK r L 1 TUTAL------------------------------------------ `- ---_-__ s ,SJ,i r, i23 2.9FU .,152 31,id0- COVPURATL PURP)St :, „ .. I 1)'l)A INIE00AD TKAf4iF t;, 64-UUU-Uu-v21d Ti.A':,, - 1v 9r 1".P`tV j`•. Uu�7 .9, 7>8 T ,.TAL INIE,(FU), Ir..r--'�C �._3 35,001- 35,+)JO- TUTAL C04POKATI c:d t':I St 5 1 1989a i-•0u`) 8.748 x BALANCE .IAL 149.033- 95- 97.300- lUO- 117.396- 93- 214,696- 96- 7.200- 100- 14.230- 71- 21,430- 79- 236.t26- 94- 11:3(,0- 100- 11.133- lUU- 1.835- 67- 24.268- 96- ?4.268- 96- 15,200- LUO- 16 470- H9- t,850- 69- 33,520- 72- 33.520- 92- 35.()00- t00- 35. UUO- lot)- 35,000- t0U- II'AIL -tt ritVt,VUt ItFVLJkI ACCRJNTI i, P. kJOu U3 FA4C1N, 713If1I9 I`7'v-ttl Y -T -U Y -T -U Cl1;: 'AC CLFRPORATt VO4PoSi S L 'i UGFI :_aI MATT ACTUAL ACTUAL INTtRFUNU TkAttSV�kS 65-00 U -U0-4 Et 7 1 Al— - _'11, AL FU :1 F,F4L 1NFEKI-V- f�P's I'00.13.750 Tr,A;'SF 1>lOUL,J 3.7St' TOTAL LUAP3RAT, `U.-(P1IS' , : L 1 19t'9=1 ----__-__ L`i.UU7 1,750 INSURANCE RESERVE N L I TAX it LVE, t1E 66-UJU-UJ-4W I FAXL:, - CURR'NT 66-UUU-UO-v UCU TAXL:: - PRI il, 44, 9UO 11.223 68-UUU-Uu-4cvd I Jt�rST INCOME - •5U•, 14.6.'5 4,334 T JTAL FAX 1�,V. ,L), ,,,UO 1.599 7.446 1 U'+,fu0 17,447 6.780 TOTAL INSURA'JC:. •tS L, V• _t E T I':'a - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - •3UU (7,447 6, 7dO CUMMUN ILAI IUVS I.I JI PML,T B F, I TAX ReYtUUt b7-00U-JL1-4031 TAXLS - CUR,,T b7-Ut3U-U.+-4u31 (,.XE> - Pd10.: 67-UUU-UJ-4146 I .TLK >T IN,"MiE IdIAL FAX KLVEVUL TOTAL CUMMUNICATJ_J'45, t .tttIVME-IT -___E_t___-__ OUNNFUM74 KTUT. VLP:lf TAX klYEr.;j, 6d-UOU-U8-4034 'P:t:TY FAX 1'l�itEMe•.T St 68-UUU-UC-4U39 '-ILLS FAX IF.CRU%�,( .500 .3 75 16:372 Idiot TaX .i' Vc,:l� 3°r5,30 a. 375 16, 372 INTERFUNO TkAASFLAi 68-UU1,-Uu-r114 tnA'tS - 1fT CUr:,T 11"7i3 7Se TS'} 68-uUU-Ui,-•.,4.3 I..J ct`• ST I c. -E Pi, 85 1 X7,000 bb-0r3U-UU-42411 ti SLt LLANL`Rli I14Cr-L 290 tr0 T +FAL 1TvTL tiI-'.Jt1 T,n''STLa;, TJ,1JU 17e 2,5 STe OL•0 TOTAL U'J.tiIFLJ V, R . �LVLI" T , L 1 t'tt,7i1 5, [a4. Ji} -----_ t'tlbti T3:372 P N FACILITY E L 1 1"17, TAX RcVEratli 3.312 533 3,745 3,B45 P -.37t 'J'Id F C 'll P kL At,( E 44,900- '14:166- 3954- LUI,020- 1, 3.0,0- .0,0- 21 . 123- 21 , I ZH- 21.123- 21,IZH- 07, 7 50- Z50- ZU' 19.750- 250- 25! 000- 41,1L0 - X BALANCE RAL L5*000- IUO- 15l000- 100- 15!000- 10U- 44.900- TOO- 54.166- 93- 3,954- 62-,:- 103,020- 94- 103.()10- 94- U 0 0 Cl 0 21,128- 56-; 0 21,128- 56- 19,750- 26= 250- 100- 0 29,000- 26- 41.128- 36- STI'ATFII RFVI;IUI ktPrgT ACC,JNTI'JG P2kdI,0 U3 FNUINS 7/31/99 UUWNI UWN kc UF VLP iI �i E I I- TC INTERFUNU FRAN't-li<S 7U-Ouv-Uu-,,104 I',A',S - I./F 1,0;.T L+47C V-9-10 i:JOGFI Y - i_0 .:>TINATF Y -T -U ACTUAL CUR NU Ut-rRL C'11 7U-UUu-UJ-4t`t-J "J f:'„57 LN'-L'i f- >u 11 ACFUtL +,ALANC E 15,777- JAL 69-u .t U-Us-•aGl T TAi: 'i -I J+'+ -!1t'ALAfJ(:E 7•a.) 75,G?3 511- 50- 1JU- 69-uUU-U.. -4I0-U i„X1 S -Y ,1 �+ T.;TAL LAX 242 600, :„3s 648 17. 9N2 13,741 l4l,TV0- 142sT00- LOU- ritY :,U, 3.1. r iuti •+:;.311 17,90x2 11.740 224,618- 224e 618- 93- iNTEMINO TkAIJSF. !,S T.3'+t 14#323 14x323 361, 31•x- 367#318- 95- 69-03�-uJ-4Lti F„+t:JS - P .7 C04.,T FtJn7 0,2?"- 15 eZ27- 52- b4-U`lU-U,.-4026 1"Af1S - kATtw F11NU-PW 69-UOu-ilJ-4 L27 IKANS - C1Rh F1 .0 ur, 75n 3, 416 0 0 69-UUU-Uu-412 J I: ,: US - WAN”FtiNU-CUUIP lU ?, OJ'i 24.949 93,750 91,750 T)TAL iNlE,,f U1. fi.,I,,S-t1tS 91,75() 23,436 93,750 93,750 000.0'/0- 100.000- U 0 OTHtk NEV ENUt l,',56 1,10,7 i,d6T e b9-UUJ-uU-,231 Mit:1,. I-V-'JUt. ,UjO 2`� 748 2. tt 7 l,n 5b 0 69-UJU-00-414i i tr,t ST 41."F.r 69-JJU-O)-41yv :1SLLLLANLgL)S INCuIL -.U')O 1.2490 ",73H 1,114 261.- 98,833- 98- TJTAL DITHER i<-V`NJL 262- 5- A FL IX •,000 1, 24d n.7id 1,114 162- 0 TUiAL N n FA-ILIIY H L t a')V76 4f,,,Otj 121,OU5 116.470 105.704 11,0010- 262- 5- ____ -® 1. 2u ,, 000 330, 0UU 313,349250.757 16,1115 367,1 JO- 367.590- 76- UUWNI UWN kc UF VLP iI �i E I I- TC INTERFUNU FRAN't-li<S 7U-Ouv-Uu-,,104 I',A',S - I./F 1,0;.T L+47C - `+, SUfi 1,374 14,313 7U-UUu-UJ-4t`t-J "J f:'„57 LN'-L'i f- >u 11 14,323 t�.178- 15,777- 5L- 7t}-UJU-Utl-yb4'} +i+tL' IUL•1"t 511- 50- 1JU- T iFAL INTERI ) ,i' Tr(,1 ,�F �. 2+.5511 7,306 0 14, 323 14,323 1S,21J- 1S,Z17- 52- TUTAL OU4NTU. tr ------------------------------------------ T.3'+t 14#323 14x323 -®_-` 0,2?"- 15 eZ27- 52- PUL ICE PLFIS I-1'1 f TAX +tVL,ijt TI-3Uu-U:r-4Uy} TAXL•; - C•J'+t: U7 lU ?, OJ'i 24.949 71-UUU-UJ-4U�0 IAXL, - ?.:ir.' t.00C 249 2.1x:7 000.0'/0- 100.000- lUU- 71-UJU-JJ-41,54 F'. I; SJ 7fL P' iiP Fi_PL TAX l,',56 1,10,7 i,d6T 117 I TIAL TAX ',V IU, ,UjO 2`� 748 2. tt 7 l,n 5b 0 94,833- 98,833- 98- 7NTESGi�Y::ct}fNtV7AL 1tVr_:IU:_ A FL IX 2.748 7I-OCUU?-4243 �Li .'^L:+S C: r.T•1TJNS 21�,UJ0 > �3.�_50 54.617 11,0010- I1,U00- 1UO- 71-UJti-UU-'1�ya L' t>_h'. Si INUJP' 1. 2u ,, 000 330, 0UU 313,349250.757 16,1115 15'1.383- 158,361- 74- 88'.,»0- 886.65 L- 74- 71 -U00 -U, -41-+U .,.,l ti ,Alt OF I, 4V ST"T 8, 7:ir1 0 T;1IAL I`1Itrt—; l+JM,-FAL i`• V',U irot ,`l0U 155, 9v d 376, lib 8,T5,' 8,750 0 :267,!,fi2 1.047,1ti4- !,047,284- 74- Tt114L I'ULICt P:,,I J.} F,I„` L,S, ,OJI) 3:'-L, 246 379;13`3:'61),71`; _________________ ____ it t46. Lal- 1,146,117- TS- ,1I.'A1 ktt 1, 1: YiU . itUt- kt �'MT ACCUUNTt .. P�-RfUU 03 EiU1N; 71 it/J9 t't •14-10 Y- T-11 Y -T -b CU': u0 UNP"C'0 FIKEMLN'S PLNSIU'! rut— 0G,T t1T1 MAT, ALTUAL ACI UAL W-ANCF BALANCE HAL TAX .ctVL•.u[ 72-uJ3-00-4u52 TxXL', - CUrx_ hT 72-uQU-UU-4JS3 „p O:J•) 12.4,tf IAX"S-'t+.1:;': 72-UUU-J?t-4243 'I'S 5.',000- 50.000- IUU- Ctt,TKL4UT ifs%S TZ-UO.;-UU-424, I", TLN; INL! ?'-IE 2J',UUQ '11.750 55, 4t,4 Ln x127 IS1.53l- 0 -ST 7Z-ULlU-UU-4249 #II l LK F:'+v'r+JUJ 34`t.4ttl 342.537 ,:77.'474 I.USt:4h3- 151.531- 73- t2-l:Jtl-i}::-4,'tJ '—IN It ':ALL 4F If44i t`Si'°T 1,U57.463- 76- IJTAL FAX N1: YE'!J,_13.110 1,6'"7.000 4L4,246 41!,116 It; 13,110 13.110 B p TUTAL FluLmL `:-t#�1}�# I,�lli 29-f,114 Le245:904- L.245,h84- IS- ...N'S ______>_____>______ t, 6, 7. 000 414, Z46 411.116 293,'9t4 1s244rH`.i4- --_ 1,245sH84- T5 - SSA UUSSL-6ILLS .. G I TAX ^.tVLN-J_ UU-00v-U1-4Ult f.rKLS - CJtitt,ttT Ht:-fIJJ-(fi}-44.'U T.xL� _ P„In, 375 43 8tt-uUU-U.'-42YS T If cr., ST INC I -t i25 30 4 i72- 371- U 9 - VITAL TAX REYL ISI':. 5UU 123 93 4T 30 32- 32- 26- IUTAL SSA �^3 isUSSt-Ftf LLf 6 I_-_- 30 404- 403- 8i- 5UU 123 47 30 4U4- 41) 3- +31- SSA 9% JUSSL-".'ILL.. TAX Ft EYLNJL tl4-UUU-UU-4Ut 7 I.,XtS - Cu,tk ",T 89-UUU-U)-4UZU faXt', - Pnl& 0 d9-UJU-UJ-4,4I I !TLP r' T INC-,.}_ 4J) T 7 7 TJ74L 14X H+..-V-,Ut v9 274 41 121- U 4J0 t9 286 41 121- 30- TOTAL �1A "� JUSS-pf L 1 114- 114- 29 - ----------------------------- -____________ 4.}U 49 2H6 91 114- 1 t4- 24— SSA MS (.ARL Nit: NI GA't MiIFr{ ttt.I TAX 4LVY Nif,. 92-u[,u-u..•-4Ui •t FAX! S - coo-t;T ++Ef 42-0JU-.p}-4t,2t F iXtS - 7'IL' ` F 92-UJU-ut-4,1, Tc•�.ST INL:+: `4 F" 1GI 0 42-Juu-u,-42v"e I -I-' SF INCI`.-•R =/'L 0 T3fAL IAX r(I tt-,.0 0 U TOTAL SSA +".s LA:(v !?It, •'I t:..„ uAtt� .SF:t ------------------------------------------ t} U SSA "6 UEUk Gt/AL i;, ,t F + G 1 TAX iLVLNOL ",",= "lural PFUDPFt_I .STt iA, Fu lU KEVE L REP OHT ACLt1UNT1SG P;_RWO 03 Et,UT"IG 1/3114 TUTAL ALL I-u:'3S 15.i -i',:375 6.474,891 8, +u 3, 940 2.605.996 U140tCrO MAL ANCE 15,4tr0- 1't..:4 9- 34.648- 66 66 14, 5+i 2- - 496- 910 o.141,496- PALL L PALL 12 BALANCE TIAL 15.400- TUO- 17.240- 60- 34.648- 73- 0 66 66 0 66 66 34.582- 73- 2q,15U- 67- 29.150- 67- 29.150- 67- 114- 29t141,494- t9r 4-.p Y -T -O Y -T -U CU. 'AO v.10t.i.T is 'iTIMATF ACTUAL ACTUAL 94-J0O-UJ-4UIi TAX -s - Cu`t� 'dT I,,4U, 3.8v9 94-u3.,-U:;-40?u t,,Xc_S-Y. Su' 31 e9i� 7, 9.r6 12:70 I JTAL IA �,,. J,-:J'Z 47,370 11.`t35 12,7021 IZs Tut iZe702 1NTLNFUNU TRANSf P 94-JUJ-0C -42, 3 TnA mS t.1A CWIST FU;tu 44-Ui:J-U�3-4cv.3 { ?: ;T Itic ;ML 100 44-JJu-U�'-4�4Y A!I? i'. INCU"'L 4 166 to i �TAL 1'4TEr,r U`.J IhA' JI E' S 1JO 24 166 26 T'.3TA: S,A 4-6 /AL -L' I L t 1 ------------- +7,450 11,859 12r P -6J 1.,725 FLUUU LOA'J u L 1 It1TEk FVNt3 TRA 9 S-uuG-UU-�Lt7 F..A»1Fi R G'G':RAL FU ib 43,715 10,9!_9 14,575 TIAL 1'1TEeri... T 4+.7'_5 10.919 14,575 TUTAL FLU,,! LOAN G 1 ________________a_-_-----_----_-____------ 43.725 1u. 929 14,575 TUTAL ALL I-u:'3S 15.i -i',:375 6.474,891 8, +u 3, 940 2.605.996 U140tCrO MAL ANCE 15,4tr0- 1't..:4 9- 34.648- 66 66 14, 5+i 2- - 496- 910 o.141,496- PALL L PALL 12 BALANCE TIAL 15.400- TUO- 17.240- 60- 34.648- 73- 0 66 66 0 66 66 34.582- 73- 2q,15U- 67- 29.150- 67- 29.150- 67- 114- 29t141,494- - IOOGET ,XPENStkEPO'tT VAL'I" ACC'1UNTt u; Pt_RIOU V3 FVUI N, 7(311.14 PUBLIC kEPRESENJ At I U'J I;IVI SIUIi 1')A9 -A) "UUGFr Y -T -D F,Ti MATt Y -T -D ACTUAL CUR "tU ACFUdt UNEXPc`1DEU UNFNCUM MAYdk AND 81JAR't OF TPUSTEt_S OALANCE ENCUMU%11E0 BALANCE 13AL (UTAL PER �,UNAL Zi,, RV ICES (UTAL CUS+RACTUAL SikYlCtj 1r,SU0 4.314 4.500 +eS01 1"•9 TOTAL COMMOUlfILS t".TSU 8.161 lT. 741 ,65 14.9559 4 13.050 74 TOTAL MAYW ANI} "UdRUOF iPUSTEtS 912 3,t93 2I8 457 14.959 46 Si.650 400 .3.467 25.49 4 4 1. 94 2:1: 4L7 1.57 13 AUYISURY BOAR US AND CtIMMISS LJ,S 28:416 53 TOTAL CUNTRA: rU.L SI"tVIL'S TUTAL CUMMOul rf�S -+•tIi 1.038 75 q'1100 fi:TAL AUVJ> )KY UIJA �. GS AND CUMNISSI 110 36 7 143 4,100 98 4.325 1.OT4 82 L43 95 TOTAL PUBLIC - 4.243 4.243 98 _____________--- -- ------------------------------------------ ----TCU- - -- - -- 5 .2.'S t4. 511 25.566 1.484 31.660 _'_! 32.659 56 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AUMINISTRAT I+'-1 ANU SUPP'URT TOTAL PLdSON4L St NVILE S TOTAL CUYTRACIUAL S,i VP FS 14t.6+,u 35*409 38,1057 11 OU53 103.201 TOTAL COMMJULTILS I'l.190 3.74' 4,166 1.851 11.024 103.203 73 fUi AL CAPLIAL EXPE„UITUkTS L,Z50 312 437 Zai HIS L1. 73 TOTAL UEBF SERYIC`- EXPENSE LrU00 244 1.40V 81dl3 65 TOTAL AOMt'}ISTKATI:"J AND aUPPURT L5l,140 1.000 100 34.762 43.0600 13.117 116.040 LEGAL SEK Y1l.ES 11b.040 73 TOTAL CUNINA:FUXL StRVTCES TOTAL LLUAL StAVTLFS 14••, OJO 34.998 35,445 iT.98 14' '•000 34.44 8 35.445 L7.O48 1,14,555,555 104.555 75 VEk SONNEI MAYA.; I. Mct)T L tR AI "Jt IrG 1J4,555 104,555 TS TUTAL PEKSJNAL SLRVILcS TUTAL CUNTRAI FLIA L SLRYt tcS 4L,250 lO.3U8 741 34.454 TUTAL {1)11MOULittS 'tr 750 0. 4is t. 8.424 934 434 L4. 323 34.459 96 TUTAL Pta UNNEL MA^LAG cM E'JJ L TRAIN adU 61,300 /5 LT•3U4 124 124 176 I4.3Z1 176 TU 59 1U. 344 1.5 T2 Sgr qS9 58.956 SALAkY ADMI NI STRA T JIM 85 TOTAL PtRSU JAL S. RVICLS -"�'.OJ0 TUTAL SAL A+V A0.41.41�Tk.1TI.lr; 62.494 2541,0(,0 TUTAL Y1LLA Gt MA 7AGlk•S '3FFIrE 2S ,OOU 6Z, 449 1511,000 150.000 250.000 tuo tau ___________________ o11, 400 1'�4,56i 88,844 31.787 5,9,553 529,551 136 CABLE TV UPERAfIJNS CAd LE TY UP -RATIONS (UTAL PEV<)U.iAI �FRVICtS TUTAL CUNT,t A', TUAL 5.--+.VFf7 S n",100 il,019 17,17 5.530 54.463 TOTAL CUILIU UtTIr.S c.rZ60 h. (h4 7r 5117 5 ++.60 16,673 56,463 T4 TUTAL CAPITAL EXPI NOT MW S t!•720 2.92H 3,204 `r 5`* H:SI! 16,673 64 TUTAL DELIT SERVICt EXPTNSE 7.730 1,432 7r7}0 8.51t 73 TUTAL CA.,L TV w;. RA TI"hr", til :'Ill ,7"4330 28.453 7,730 LOQ TU(At CABLE TY uPtKAT/C :S �•v46 1) 1,177 83. 377 75 ------------------------------------------111,'110 27e 933 2H,433 o.y46 H3. 3TT g3,37T T5 P46L 14 UNE XPEt1DEU UNENCUM ?JUt,EI r7+PENSE kEP O�tT-• i,ALA'ICC ACC')UNTivG P RIUO 03 Et.DING 71311:19 TB 1-):+9-90 Y -T -D Y -T -O ED- 710 FINANCE UEPART4t.4T Dr, r tST I PA T_ ALTUAL ACIUAL AUMINISTRAT10,1 AND SUPPORT 112,897 0 80 53,074 58,+)74 TOTAL PERSONAL•7U�t 3,093 3,091 91 414 TOTAL CU�YTRA:=TUAL sckVICE1 d3 17sj6' t4'°14 4.274 TUTAL CUM. t S 1 o,,(' 15.843 11+173 3,815 TOTAL CAPITAL at LEXXP Ei U,I TUR( -S +•250 1,3ufl 1. 3ab 329 r- TUTAL OEBI "I CL EXPINSE %'Ou0 750 70,820 80 TOTAL AUMI.ISTRATIC1tl ANO SUPPORI 4.150- 59- `+.000 5.000 to0 L.".370 3".070 27,473 8 r4 id ACC UUNTiNG 68 5.857 5.957 T8 TOTAL Ptl, SOr1AL SC:RVIT.ES 20,807 Ti 13.715 13.7i5 TOTAL CU'.TRA_WAL SEHVIC'-S N�,515 Z0, 640 2f•SUI 6,795 TOTAL COMrIoOlIItS - 3,4U0 846 307 ZUd I JT AL ALCJUUT lr,;, 500 IZ3 86 78 80 +6.475 21.609 24.894 7,081 PURCHASING 70 25.416 25,8i6 89 TOTAL PL(SJAAL SC=RV1CtS 7.081 99 `t�37 89,236 TOTAL CLINTRALTUAL StRVICtS �1, SUO 5.373 5+901 _'•65'i IUTAL CU`N1Uut TITS 509 123 TOTAL PURCOASING i, 100 423 101 23.700 5,919 6,002 2.655 ELELTH0,11C DATA PkOLESSu4G Ti}TAL PE",,SJfJAL SfRViCES TOTAL CUIIRALIUAL SLRVILI:,tls9v3 )3.001) 1-T.iR0 4.2 SI TUTAL CUMMOUITIcS 1,000 1,749 11.150 3,219 TOTAL OL31 SEkV1C-_EXVE�.SE „ OU0 1.248 TOT -L ELCCTRUI+IC DATA +•kf),. ESS("1G 3`+,300 9.4e'5 39.300 39.30) L3v+30"1 34,R15 67.630 469170 DUPLICATING St. {VILE, TOTAL CU"1TRA_TUAL SFVVICES TOTAL CUMMUjI TILS Z/i000 5.4v9 7,050 3032 TOTAL OUPLLLA1l 1G Sit-4lCi`S 1+509 1,875 1.643 1.643 •SUO 7,374 8sb93 4,975 ILLLPMUirt SLKVILF TOTAL PNPS11,4AL SE RVtLLS TOTAL CUNIRA'.IUAL S,a VTCv, il'900 v, 725 5.1115 1,034 TOTAL CAPITAL rX"E'+altURE=S 44,500 11,124 13,398 6e014 TJtAL T"IP,•WIL SLr,V1L--c.SU0 6G4 "'+•900 16+473 18.5113 7,044 INSURANCE TOTAL PtP S.;:IaL S-kV1C1-S FIJI AL CONTRA-TUAL', �1�Vti'S Las1Ju b,612 7.696 =,197 TUTAL DEBT VICL EXPENSE 200 106,050 d4. N40 4 .420 TOTAL lh'-04„"C-, 45 9U0 112,722 ")[,536 41.61v CUSTOMEk SEkVICLS TOTAL PLny1,VAL S':RVIL+_S IUTAL CU;tl IR A, TUAL S'3'''0'3 P VI C' S tn.i,+yl Z4+061 6.687 TOTAL Cu;10.)JI T [ t S _ `t,U�i1 7114 ” J. 104 813 TUTAL CUS�cR VIG" 1,150 1+762 b9 11'„55') [x,127 27,3(4 7.510 CASH MA NA G,: iyE 7.T TOTAL PLn S:11AL :, FRVICcS TOY AL CASH MA:.A.,'-ME tlT 1i ''125 Se 703 6,781 1.941 2'.825 5.?03 6.781 L,t41 P46L 14 UNE XPEt1DEU UNENCUM % i,ALA'ICC Ft:CUMRt'REO BALANCE dAL 5)•786 53.186 TB 5_',247 52.247 82 3.464 3,864 74 3, Ou0 3,Oou 100 t12.097 112,897 0 80 53,074 58,+)74 70 3,093 3,091 91 414 414 d3 61,581 61,561 71 15.5.4) 15,599 73 5Uo 500 100 1.599 1,599 y4 l l• b98 11,698 15 70.820 70,820 80 4.150- 4.150- 59- `+.000 5.000 to0 71,a70 71.670 0 5l (4,950 14,950 68 5.857 5.957 T8 Zu,°U7 20,807 Ti 13.715 13.7i5 73 31,102 31,102 70 2,500 2.500 to0 47.311 47.317 72 19,OU4 19,004 71 339,360 339.360 80 j"'.3640 35b.3b4 79 56,339 56.339 70 25.416 25,8i6 89 7:(',,12 7.081 99 `t�37 89,236 77 16,044 16.044 70 16,044 15.044 TO ."'U"IT ' XPENSL +<LP-JiT 4CC+)UNfl`"; P RI -11) 03 (D+0[N•.; 7t 3L199 F t r9 -`I,) Y -T -n Y-T- �"10,;-T F,IATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FINANCE iIE�AklNe+dT TMC NUN-UEPAk IMEJTAL cX9£:)0ITU i, 2.560 2.Sf0 100 IUTAL Clfl IRAi.TVAL St- VIL1S 29.150 24.150 67 f UTAE UL'1TEXPtRC 11.550 614 69 TOTAL ,Ul-JcfAf19._FAI Xe'F=rc v3':•5TJS 10.914 14+5751E 4r'Z9 t.a16 40+412 11,553 14.575 TUTAL FIYANLI Uc-'401,1,. it Z5,637 '5.637 8t ----------------I+12L.745 _______________________ 1r".)69 tnn: 165 294.491___ VILLAGE CLERK -1 .JFF 1Cc 6TsQ17 bT,916 0 T5 AUMIIl1STk ATI,);l ,N,) l:JPPURT 31'081' 31,000 75 TOTAL VER l.:./AL S` RVIL=S 3.750 100 TUTAL CU#IRA,.IUAL StRYICtS 5'e1S++ 13.782 14+739 IUTAL CU3MUUlltt, 31+520 7.812 5+803 SEKY[r_ TOTAL UELTEX Pf NSE - 1.500 873 1+633 ILHAL A+)M1 .15IRAF1vit A')U SIIPPURT 1r153,3a1 1,15H,361 15 100.801 -111+171) 12+527 21,254 VILLAGE NE141LtTit-k 2311.130 230:238 T2 IOIAL C1i'+TRA'_1UAL S+=PVtL@S 54.312 58,322 04 TOTAL CUllf"OIi TI ES 41.150 1 311 10, 15Z 1 UT AI YlLLAUt. `t_4 SL, 3+750 436 IUU .TTR 45+000 11,.47 t0, ISL TOTAL VILLAGE CL(.kr,'S AFFtfE 101,506 101.,596 7Z -------___--_ ---- 13`,111) 33.774 32.416 RISK MANAGEMENT 5.7it 5.792 84 RISK MAaAUEMC.IT 7r 3,f Ts320 yQ TMAL CtU+.Tk ACTUAL S:_,'VIC: $ 117.'166 210,466 b0 TOTAL 't11K M4NAG ME. �VT PRU!.k A`1 1.5 ) .5t}n 3 .T+Hbf 393.139 1, SS1.Su+� x. 1, Hb 393.137 TOTAL RISK MANAU MLNT ---__-__ is 55"•50,) 397. PST 393.139 INSPECTIU'J SEkV1CcS INSPECTION , RYtCtS TUTAL Pl.',;.lL :';Rvlc'S > TOTAL CON IRA_tUAL '-"VI LES -+-r 005 79. h42 00e 561 TOTAL CtlrAMu.)ITIES '+*5J', 17,310 11.208 TOTAL CAPITAL LXV£`+JL-TUP)-y 2, 1,OU1 TOTAL DL3T a^'i VlC_�•SU) t x 1`r ,.> F 1,371 FJf AL lN, p"'.fiJA '['wiCFS - +u3.'Jn5 100. I7q EiG U3EFk1NU SE dV IC_, TOTAL PLR, .i l:rL y "V11 FUTAL CU'i TRA_IUAL Sc+:YK`S 24,,25.: '.is 241 71,664 TUTAL CUM'"'JI TtiS 44+659 11151 20+34U I UT AL CAli ITAIXP UPS t.V_)1TS •5u0 1+613 7ud TOTAL DE"T SFdYt� _ LX!': :vSt '.SUO t"Ill 172 TUTAL 'W,I �+-Fk[ r'. ;L�Vl-, 311,90E 77,943 lUU. 974 TUTAL_ i+vSVCL Ff+J++ �'VVIL _-_-_ _S 71 a"y5 174.617 1:.1. Tlt i)"r XPrt:i)EU UNENCU"! % 4ALAt.CE ENCOMNL Nt0 BALANCE dAL 2.560 2.Sf0 100 29.150 24.150 67 11.550 31.650 69 f 3LU17 '127.[65 14 4r'Z9 t.a16 40+412 40.412 73 167 Z5,637 '5.637 8t 1r".)69 1s0aT 53 6:612 6TsQ17 bT,916 0 T5 Z•631 31'081' 31,000 75 2.6313.750 3.750 100 34. IJ 31' 34,836 77 0e64i 102055 102.754 76 109.881 1.15H.3bt 1,158,361 15 108.88! 1r153,3a1 1,15H,361 15 100.801 1,15a.36f 1,159,361 TS 25.935 3.641 2311.130 230:238 T2 119 54.312 58,322 04 8.147 6.247 89 5,500 5.500 IUU 29.755 302.107 302.307 75 21.633 12x561 101,506 101.,596 7Z C12 15.260 16,260 16 55 5.7it 5.792 84 7r 3,f Ts320 yQ 34+471 117.'166 210,466 b0 6'. 51 7.273 -113.273 72 �)U',F) I $VF 4S, t<tPd.<T a CC1113111 A P.K1)10 US FNOIOb 7131/89 I`359 -1^i Y -T -U Y -T -U 1.111. "0 POLICE UE PAk7MLV1 G)Of; tT .iT3+-IAT_ ACTUAL ACT Of AUMIN1SIRATI-.il4 A.411 iI1110.IRT 313.659 313,659 73 IL,T AL P L < i il,,L 1v 1•.V IC`S 101 AL CO'11RAL I UAL ac 7, ln5 106.770 113.506 VILtS TOTAL Curl 11JOII 1- 14 .OJO 36.489 3Tr 4j3 TOTAL CA1'1 '-%P_+.vT tU6t } 'x. S75 499 499 3.103 TOTAL ULSL1ST SLKVI( - c%��-NSE 800'-) 1,24° 315 TOTAL •\uN1�:1 S7k tC t") ,7r- ,UPP,_IRI Sty .t`.5 147,0'16 154.477 PATRIIL AN. TRAFF IL ENFiIkC LME`iT t4.',5L7 142.587 59 TUTAL Pc�S 1-1- S, RV KL; PJIAL CU'11RA_IOAL 2r 33-.2-0 714,055 606,549 SLKVIL,-} TUTAL CU -4 4dilIILS 243. 51J -0.876 100,933 IUTAL OtuT to gvl- EXPL,SE P3,30N 7,071 26.379 TOTAL P„IR-; -NJ 1'?AF1 IC LMFORCEME-r6Ll,tIO 13.626 652,002 733,861 CKIME PKEV., 1'0.11 IL A+lO YQtljti ScRV. 1.749 2.7,0 82 TUTAL P N:IJU iL }t nVICES 1Ji.54'1 25.377 18,047 1LIT AL CU ITRA:TUAL SLCVIL S 14,'JZU 3,b99 77 TOTAL Cwl,-1UUJ TI LS `..3511 29.660 1.194 TOTAL Otui SF1tVIL:- txPtJ!`E 2,186- 934 bUt TUTAL CRIT fh('W , PVOLIL AND YJUT it 71j 29.9l (' t9,P,3 INVESTIUAJIVL AfW JUVLN1Lt PROGRAM 43,)•,'r 43,044 83 TUTAL PLd SU';AL �''{VICLS 4.1 .. 7T+0 1,)6,428 99,647 TUTAL CUITKA'.I UAL S ',620 �•'e0U0 9.4U2 7.960 F OT AL CU-MnjJT1t:S 35,621 4'8 4,386 TJ11AL )Edl }tRVICL EXV`NSE 63,064 63 1063 78 TUTAL I ,VL;TI-ATIV, AN,' J1'V:-N1Lc P 4,;,417 11=,.325 111,993 CRUSSING 6UARU`. 27.070 27.069 It TUTAL Pb(SU.{.tL 5+RV1CeS rJ,�)JU L2,999 8,956 TUTAL CUMMUUI TI LS s00 123 TU TUTAL CnJ3SINL .;UAR:j% 57,501; 13.1.22 8,946 E QUI PM, NT MAIi41`,71A"lt C ;)PL P. NT It;N1 32,789 32,787 71 7UT AL PLI SO.NAL S! kV IC,='; , . ;Ss 11.643 10,904 FL)IAL CUN Ik A:IUAL )cuVI CCS '31.410 21,014 17.3,1 TUTAL CUMA:IUI IItS il".200 29,547 34,911 IUTAL [AV IIAL I X:�c'11:1 T11P.} 2',t, TOO 02,{19 224,631 TUTAL EJ011'11'41 'iAl;TL':A{LE C L1PFK '+4',,895 124.203 287,R•t' TUTAL PULILC uLP tRTML�41 4,33 ------------------------------------------ %. 7yn 1.0s2. 571 1.316,991 FIRE L L"Lkul OLV rkuTcCIJuM :,EPT. AOMINiSTRAI JUN ANU SUPPORT TUT AL PL4 x;,{fit , i,V ICc S TUTAL CU',FPA-IUAL ', , - ,s -4,. '4 15,82 4 _rVTCtS Fill AL CUMwIU:31 T Its 3UU 62 11 r 5 5,62 1 3, 3 TOT AL CA' TIAL cXP L1=JI Tt3p, S 3 a) 'ali.034 9 11 8. y„4 IUTAL UtbI SCKViL, LXPCNSE ,TJU J, 921 2, s17 IUTAL 16Pll11STr T)''. .,'J ,UP1, ;11'7 , =39 311I' 91)rri*1 UNFXPt 14OE)i UNENCUM t '.;AL A'1LL ENCUAHF R10 BALANCE BAL 44,428 313.659 313,659 73 1 �.1t2 113N,5.d 108.51T 74 124 0,1317 6.837 68 160 'x. S75 4x675 94 64.4240 43 J"h89 433.6811 14 181,721 t. 72',, 741 1, T29. 741 74 17.66'1 t4.',5L7 142.587 59 1:.21 1.122 1.`{2l T 209.1(1 1.174,280 1,874.249 0 T2 +.699 .3.493 83.493 62 58Z 13.626 13.626 92 141 1.749 2.7,0 82 5.422 99,d64 99.867 0 83 28,399 32h. t43 326,143 77 5.292 21,660 29.660 T'{ Zit 2,186- 2r36b- 119- 31.921G 353.417 ,53,417 76 43,)•,'r 43,044 83 500 500 t00 43.5`+4 43,544 83 1:81'3 35,621 35,621 76 5,245 63,064 63 1063 78 11,078 It ),190 83.290 TO 144 27.070 27.069 It 21).274 2(,9.045 209.043 42 330.153 3,J11.:S15 3,U13,dU8 TU 1'.60., 192,913 192.913 T5 `, 3U'. 32,789 32,787 71 J..'Ga 21.181 23.1&I T2 I' -'8J 11.184 J3,Id3 84 25,7940 ?62.1i'7 152.064 14 43UbET IXPENS E,FP,h2T. ACCUONTI,,; Pt R11.'I5 Us t):UtM11: 7l3ttd4 1 P+9_41) Y -T -V Y -I-() CU,+ .,0 't't UG -- T ` TIN1 Tt ACTUAL ACTUAL Flkl C L`tER GE NC P,2 �JF t F I:,N .�kl't FtdF ULPAhTME4T ;YLHAfjLl*jS l,Ga?.HSS 1,965.835 T3 TUTAL Pft,Sf)iIAL S+.NVILL, (UTAL CU'-Tc.:A.:IUA(- SckVFC`.S .7J2.030 675.495 736.195 TUTAL CSM, 1)0111, !t i.+590 .L 71G 46 TUTAL CA,'I'AL LX1'c1:T7!lu, y 12,15E J. . 030 1, 7 7L,21 1 FUiat OE'!T SL;4ViC t- LxP+_r¢SE 9/:155 ,3.277 10,91,{ 1 UI AL F1,t :, tAk0 W.,T 'iP1-:IATI!JYS i,:+E`.215 7�4, 51 '{ 747,3,1 CUUE ENFUkC t -ME 11 U TUTAL PLKi` 4AL So-tYICL> U TUTAL CU'ITRACIUAL Scr'.YtCtS 0 TUTAL CUM"41)1l2L5 150,385 150,3b5 15 TUTAL CAJi L`O`0iL,-Mk:47 1 .1S8 28:168 86 Ftht P9tvt'11IU" - 3,378 11 T-IIAL f'LlY'.-L S PVIC-' TI)TAL CUh fRA.I UAL ?_+l e�`35 1:056 SU. 710 SL'�VI C,S TUTAL CUM+iJJII Its -'a965 "e 205 4.697 FuTAL CAPI I -AL F X1`kJt fi)K'-S 4.770 (,LAS 1,392 TUTAL JttiI ): ,Vit.+- .t.YPt.Ia.E 4,65() 1.11 3.592 TJf AL f t,L PRLV: Tli,"1 35.19'1 35,149 db -+t 2: 4. 38J SJ.8/0 60,34! LU9MUNI LA TE UN, 18,441 18,441 78 TUTAL CLNT7:A.IUAL St-kVIL.:, 3+).1 e4 30.134 68 TUTAL CAPITAL +-XVINDIT,)R!-S 31 5LPI 7,975 S.7G1 TUTAL CJ,IMUalCAFLtI-, .,460 2.354 l5 4 .960 L'r234 5,761 CQUIPMENT MAl',i€cAA`ILc E CP'RATILINS 2, Tud 2.308 77 TOTAL PEKSCI'q..1 Sr RVI( -e4 3, hr,1 3.661 97 TUTAL CUY IR,. -./UAL '-4 VI L'_S rot, 355 15, T{2 L5,44 TOTAL CU�IMTJUI FIL1 13. 5„)95 �.1144 TUTAL CAPITAL EXP_-r,UE 7U f: S 4' 01) 1.9118 13.866 TUTAL UL'it i_.Y t:._ LXPF,.Si- ��, 1T.,o') ) I4 4. 688 14.070 FJ€AL -!)1 'M-C,I "fit tTr .A SLE t PF+t 01.750 15,9:6 54.450 .: 2','.44,) .3,,179 toe, 859 EMLK6tNLY PKI P% -E LP :',' 28c), OSS ZHU,OGti 75 TUTAL Pti, 2:)IIAL S� RVIC i': ',UJB) 1 V I AL CU-aT<A..IUAL S,=1 )0f C - S TtiJ f)91FbTAL Ct:+1. is+JIIL -] i.TjO yv5 t29 TOTAL CAPIT;.L XPL'tul €!ti:, S nr. 210 310 T11f Al t_:t; R',_v+CY',ti P9R U: SS 5e* i 1: 6,,9 1C4 1 •.4.:5 1, 5+4 1.235 TOT A,- F1 '( -N, F1 6-`:TF-C-�+^_rPT.'4_`,11. 115 9+te4<r8 1rUS'"r412 CENTRAL JISPATLrI SELVICF POLtLt 1. FIRL JESPATCrt ., L.VIC. S FUTAL CL ITk A.fU.,l ;1'.VIL S FUFAL "ULA -t E F1Ko of ;P"101 SEivl 37,..1br) 374,16,) 43r Sot' 43,5.G 94.155 TUTAL €tNFRAL J11VA1i, ,ERN 1t.t 37 '3,540 _______ /,160 94,155 wit xe,:,,ntD UNENCUM t ttALAit(.F F-)Ct)M9,Rt0 UALARCE NAT_ [04.444 l,Ga?.HSS 1,965.835 T3 23./37 1h2, 399 162x399 77 328 €) 541 1,.429 /0,429 86 91.237 82,137 88 13'1._5/ 2,220.909 Z, 1ZU.9C0 0 14 0 U U 0 14,,145 150,385 150,3b5 15 1,703 1 .1S8 28:168 86 1161,+,378 144 ',uS4 3,378 11 1:056 Z3 16.954Ib..9ry4 182,989 0 15 1.199 2-+.739 15,739 82 2,199 `1,460 9,460 100 35.19'1 35,149 db 4,450 47,1116 47.026 75 963 5.016 18,441 18,441 78 160 3+).1 e4 30.134 68 5-,,490 4-,, b90 44.690 T6 65,!)3- 4,300 9, 3UU l5 14'1,591 149, 391 59 231 2, Tud 2.308 77 t to, 3, hr,1 3.661 97 104 540 540 64 n*61,1 b,661 98 446 13.170 13.170 9T 353,)04 !.''63,1116 2:863,913 73 31..1H 28�.0:K 280.005 75 31,313 2Hu. G-,5 180.0,5 75 3E:Jd5 28c), OSS ZHU,OGti 75 IMF XPE7 Oto UNI, NC UH 'UUt.Ei _rPE^t S, �.<PudT E„Lu1t3Eft; U BALANCE "cc 'i-UNT1.1c, P;-ul''tt 0j t^lt)1N. 71311"9 18.93H 1`319-'>3 'S)Uf, Y -T -O V -T -U Cul, 111 HUMANSLR VT LEa J1V1Si�i'� I ,(1MA le AL COAL ACi UaL I NF Oa MA I I Ut;' K ECa[<AL, ,. L IULI ELIN' 0 B L, 805 75 TUTAL PI'( SJ IAL S:. KV Ir - Tui AL LUNIRA;. IUAL S, r,VIL, 7'',080 1).710 2Us 703 7s97C �; IUTAL CUMAu it i l`:, Lt+7r,0 7,931 4. R22 Ls 331 TUTAL LAP I IAL '-. AP TUFT S 3, 401 8:6 100 164 TUTAL DE:'•( � I- i; vlt LxPr'ISL .90) 723 747 44.018 TUTAL INEU -. sA1IJti, rtt TEK; AL. L UJ I..rt.94(-r 7."tC 70 '109 909 70 L 17,072 ',447 PIC Kt. AI INN A'IU `)UC.AT I(i': 2,344 84 240- 240- TUTAL Y}4:,')N.Q SLK`7ICLS IUTAL CU'JIkA.TUAL SI.='Vit°S l�sF:50 3'210 3,749 I"v79 TUTAL CAPITAL iXPC "ITUl,fS l.6S+i 411 1.039 75 TUTAL kO.IiLATtI UCAT1("4 14,SUU 3.1,21 175.47H 175,478 74 30.547 U6,547 4'7118 1.078 HUML)UU:.') SERVIL;:S 80 "'499 2.999 79 TuTAI PF' -S: I:1. S nV lC�; TUTAL CU.T?A.1UAL ';,VICFS12.930 4.:655 ilr l6tT 4.771 S TUTAL r�.)-:-iUt':.} I_ -'VICES 1'+150 7tib 2, HS 977 [4.275 ', is l'} 5 14 9w6 151, TUT 93 LLCA MUI.ITY ACTIV11Ic 40,000 l00 :'I, 015 87,615 I(,I AL PEn SG IAL �,f-,V ItS IJTAL CU`)TkA. IUAL :,r it Vi L::S 7,602 4.0UH t.t+44 OT TOTAL CU747.1tY ntTiVIIIt i r 3Uil 324 391 SH , it,715 7.926 9,479 Lr70[ t7L'JUU OuNUK Pr I-RAlt TUTAL Plt yf INAL ar t+VIC, S a,)5 1.99 TUTAL CU'l TRA .I UAL S:. t'VIfiS .,. 't0l 154 TUTAL CU4.tU)I I ILo 240 8U TUTAL-7L1)L, �ntY�Jv I'n"+,vA.r i ' 450 360 t" 15 rr275 1.059 igl 2 44 SUC IAL AGENT -ILS TUTAL CU`.Tk.i.IUAL S. kvlL� S4:746 TJT..L :U£.1.�L A,_.` (1 cS 19,UUU 4. 770 4.75u 4.746 4,750 4,750 TUTAL AUMAr: SL,'Vi LLQ /I VI�,Izr, -®_-_----_ ?I",215 S4, SVP b1.747 22.121 PLANNING ANU LJ+IL4U OLV ART MI_'.T AU41t4IS THAT i ),a A.I� PL A'U11 o', TUTAL f'LtSO'!AL SC: K'V 1CL� TUTAL LUilRA.IUAL ,^, VI L'S tZ J.9•}0 30. 1119 34.251 I,)4� a: TUTAL CuM:tUUI II LS 2', YUtI 4. TtU 4r 5 3 1,764 U TTAL CAt'tlAt.-YF'�asJI ltl;t�S 1.`1011 v45 n.,1 R TUTAL ITL1T SL, vIC'_ FRPr E rU.tO 4)y t'.1 IUTAL AJrit iS1�tAI1,h A'-!• PIAFIN i `)G 1',•,5.711 )7.ISu 39,7,33 1�. EL(INUMIL al V! t, wm,t iT TUTAL Vt.-)4AL !I. rtJICL`. }r„9pp ye 721 t_IIAL CUt41k ALIUAL 1c1VIC, S 1Us62S "r )26 TUIAL CAPITAL _XI's-�I P)RI S / .0i1fI /„149 Ir6i_U IUTAL fl::a; :IL t', VI L_1P..,_ r�.I i;1, )'10 .)".900 1.999 41,` r 69 12.rct5 3,6Z6 IMF XPE7 Oto UNI, NC UH It ;JA L ANLL E„Lu1t3Eft; U BALANCE OAL 5ci. U97 51.097 74 18.93H 18.938 80 ,,IOU 2.700 79 2.173 2.153 74 0 B L, 805 75 'F.ICt 9,tit 71 61t 611 31 0 9.712 9.712 67 31.725 31.725 71 12,243 i2.293 8t 44,0tH 44.018 74 21,)37 21.337 70 '109 909 70 22.146 22.246 70 2.344 2,344 84 240- 240- 0 1,260 1.260 87 3.364 3,364 79 14.25U 14.250 75 14,251+ 14.250 75 175.47H 175,478 74 30.547 U6,547 72 10,362 18.362 80 "'499 2.999 79 t,3ti9 t,8U9 90 0 t�9. 71 7 lOy,7t7 73 24.175 [4.275 7(1 23,340 23,340 93 4').000 40,000 l00 :'I, 015 87,615 88 _(i G`.Et `.PENS' REPORT ACCOUNT yG FSP If'D 03 ENDIN; 7131/fig 113)9-90 Y - T - D Y - T -D cul, ;�U P tANN1N4 Atuir Z11ULV' a4 • s .UfcT i TiMAT_ ACTUAL ACTUAL tJnE XPc1.UEF3 'I U-.EYCUM ,e 1r„-TMt"•T LnINNi Uky KL UE Y': L')PMt'li'T tt LA XF F!.CJM61-R+D VALANCE HAL '., TUTAL PLR, 5.11 JAL ,k<V IL c`• TUTAL CUWfRA=fUAL ;:'-VIC'S i3r4ir. S, g4T 2+612 bq7 TaA TOTAL ).:ANT ' h Ntu ,:lit Vi LJPti. NT-tif- 23 20t7AR d9 e4J•) 5,947 2,0 t2 G49 0 CUBE AGM(L[STNAT[U'1 2'}r 7;iH CU. TVs 84 TUTAL PL.S JN.'L Sr KV ILLI -. ,•.rhU•} - 7,395 TUTAL CU�1tRA ,UAL :.R Yf SFS A, 675 2,733 ZUr 475 IUi At CUM, iJlflc; ite600 )x.542 2,243 79i `u, 20,425 T! TOTAL CAPITAL tuH1S 4e150 Z45 347 1,150 4.347 81 TUTAL CU1G wjMlit;TP:ATiUw IeOJO249 it 2 NIA 1,15U !U0 i 4 , 35C7 IU,!1Ll Ile JGt3 3,514 3 2. 818 d2 CU'+4 COill ,yHU'Y i'KJG <A �> 290 32,240 74 TC fAL CU,T4,-IUAL '�cFV[LFS TOTAL CU.iu .,1;t4MP 1TY PRUC,:AMS 7:".6011 5c`t6L3Cl 13,143 13.143 52,6(10 529600 100 COG ACCES>t xll_t TY E It lG(�+. rt✓ttOUI' IMPN V;t 5Z.6U0 52♦600 100 TUTAL CA,'ITAI i_RPr:: X31 TJk"5. 1 f, 5JO 38,373 TUTAL CDA, ,.CCE , S 3:. it it Y t rlt 1GH"iU t7 it 4UU 33:373 11 2 19:.3114 153,388 I00 tllnt, At: SIC't Jvi lA, N�HAbtLI V, FIItR' 112 151e 369 153*389 too f UT AL PLK �,UYAL Si KV IC S UT AL CAPITAL FAPt'sJ[TUIt�1 ,0)'.' 1.560 1153 291 TUTAL CJ 4 .ESL :t_aFIAL NL,,A31L1TAT 10 LJUO 14,949 12.564 5t'v4L 5x147 7,431 9147 86 I rJ(16 S. 4`>4 1.3.422 5,335 87.431 87 C 0R4 tUMMI KLI AL KEHA.:lLU Al 10:1 91,578 42"578 137 T Of AL PtR S': iAL >:_IVIC[S TUT At CU I TRA_TI1hL Stt:V1LLS i, Out) Ir49A 2.524 5tl6 ,UTAL CAPITA, tMPE'I Tit IUK! S 505 §s4T2 5,472 6A TUTAL CU G CJMF :•LI AI_ r.i4+B IL IfATI ). .J.iO 7, SOO 30,040 1x415 1.425 71 +"e0), ?r 9'1633e lS3 586 v0- 40- U CDA4 kECNEAf1U'awl A:iiA !OF Yc LUPMftiT 6,'741 68 47 17 TUTAL CAPITAL L%P E•l 1)1TUPI.1 T'Jf AL LU -4 LKE4 TI U,.AL At EA UL VEL O CUJG MULL 1-EA.9tLY at-iAdILIT At18t1 0 f UTAL PL't�-1'1AL S_KVILLS IUTAL CA.'IIAI t S1Pt". JI TUKI.S 1.24 235 13 ',265 TJTaL Co, 4 .IUL(L-1 A:tILY R HA -til ITA •eOUf' 5Jt1 459 UU0 - 6'),CC, 2,245 4t .,Lr 15, LZ4235 tcJ 6U.000 t00 C UN4 UU kIN TJ SN Iai'kUVr M+.ryTi 62.2.65 6.: Z65 LOU TOTAL PL!t SUNAL Sr.KvIrL; TUTAL CUUTNA[.IUAL SLkVICi1 1,:}:}1} Z4Y 155 Z4 IUTAL CAP jI:.t cJ(Pr:: s..t, -, 009} t. 24d ti45 '!45 dS :� fUI AL CU :6 uU:+Yt J"t.; _ .'P.Ua FM: „I> ,_ ,9,10 i'„418 ,4 `*140 5:000 tuU - SJt' 1„415 13961,?16 2"I 61416 l0U TOIAL'PLANNIN, A- LA 1N; 67,161 67,,761 100 at•'A�-:i Mc r;t 19+,617 I12.401 Z'+e`JU4 htl STREET OIV1Sl UN ADMINISTNATIA4 AN'l iUPP_.P.t ILIT AL PER 51it4L S. .<VIL CS L 6(5 IUi AI CUv T.t A:;UAL S;EVI LIS , '+7rh4U 45r Lr•4 13 5q 14Se 3',i "r 2n.' tar 3^7 i7, 646 4,'�9't t45, 35i 76 - 75,G14 75,614 at OticrN,:" E1, U'IEMCUM ��'-iU+:LI :%NEIvS� kFNti�L T.. Lt lC1,11W. RED `BALANCE ACC-I'+NF1 .I; P, kttju IJ i:.t!1'a;; 713,!''9 1.0UU 1.000 Y -T -O Y -t -J; C(W aU S Tk EEf 111 Vt SI U;v •-"UGLT ", T, VA T! ACTUAL tC1 UAL AUMIttiISTKAI lU!4 Arita 66 44.929 44.928 61 IJIAL LLIMidlIIL:' 14.808 99 5. 711'} 5,7u0 TUTAL CAuIIAL -Xx El. 111 TUkJ S irr3�1'1 232.969 t0 1.074 T(IT AL Ut,:I SLEVif- t FIV,4,E t.OJC 149 7B TJTAL A,,MS JIIT4,F;,=l A'.11 ,UNd!.kT , T4, 517 94 5,2P4 94 '175 4S,SIC bo. 2[9 23.763 MAI NTt:NANLF JF pUI+LIC ,}111 L'iN„S 66 d' • 354 80,35H 78 TOTAL PL' 1.:4tL S`:;'J1Lt'1 TOTAL CU:I:+.t_ 1IJ "- ,,'.975 88 43. Sb3 12 AL : S �,VICi TOTAL CUM AOU 1+S is T07, et9 1 7,466 23,779 e'-134 3,•331 TOTAL CAPAPIT,iAL :XP_,JVI (UK' $ SU+1 18,363 26.572 12,.12 TOTAL 0- 11 S, +tVlt _ tXV-NSE OvO 3.747 192 tit TUTAL 1,.[141! NIA;IL "F K,LLIC ! UILn1 1 tit. 33,,'175 1.425 95 S7,h13 57,513 94 63 e 4aC l: ie ilb 28, 793 MAI NTLJANCI: OF biit'Jit)', 14.233 t00 2t..UUO ZG.000 IWAL PLNI'J+JAL Si kV1LL. I,' 69S 25.608 97 3t*551 TOTAL CU•11RA_ ILIAL 'l—VI L, 75 22,775 44 3118 12, J92 TOTAL CU:^B.4: toi I I,.S c'.+siuv 6e b24 S, l22 59,856 TOTAL CAPITAL _XPtt Jt FOR1 S 950 1+73L 4149 1 1 441,(_ JF LP I.U..I,S is6`iU 14; 1.437 36b 84 ,795 35,4;0 48.245 131"87 STktET MAI: TLIIA:4CL TOTAL Pt, St11AL I. KVICt:, TuTAL LU'IFRA_(UAt +784 2°}'140 27. b04 11136! .,,FV1Li ., TOTAL CuM.3•}utlitS i�B�Su'1 25y w72 23,1'2 2urS63 TOTAL CA'='ITAL =. XPLr,�t TlNhiS -.,5011 3.616 4,295 7x983 FUTAL S1,1. ( "A P,111 1, f,5�.')It1 t11, 742 110."326 .A'lLi l+rl;,7Jh146,-126 `'.7s,•,_u lbS, KbT 14b,713 SNOW KLMUVAL TOT AL PEli S'J,1AL :,LRV1Ct.i .4v.� 7iror�6 TOTAL LO,1kA'.(UAt `>LPV IL': ., 9. b52 3.358 TOT AL LU'34!IUI IIL, .0011 1.746 TUTAL CAi'lTAL tX",.', JIFUa?_S 7,sUu 1I, 490 iuTAL S:iU.x ,�l (I'}V'L 14. :�„u 3r 1,21 171,94,3, 1,469 9,+,h2 1,359 ' LEAF Rt.iUVAL T AL Pt't S.''aA,_ S't:VICL}912 TUTAL CUNIKA,IJAL S,RVIt,1 605 TOTAL Ctidlutit I I t', 12,0O'l 3,('30 TUTAL IFAt IFAL XI>.J•: et(}JI': S 1 . Jul; 3, 5 JU <.7 TJ14L LILAC _ 19+}tl i. 3,715 f J4 STORM aEti ER AA -i iSi: :''All+(t_'JV4U TOTAL Pt'.si'JAL S_,,VlttS TOTAL LUVFk,I_I!JAL LJ S ;45 lt'e 5•:+, 10.,494 [.465 .>_JVi TOTAL CUM 1UUi (It. �, Ls +wli' s .9t7 1:z25 1,22h till uL IJF.' ,_..c. _, ASTM ,.,1 Y7r t'"JJU 045 3.747 4,47" ,481: [.,ti0 21, I G 9 .1 7r; FORE: T14 Y #u1 AL PL,; ,�i.;,, 1I S I?'d ltt', TUTAL CU•. In,t. FOAL ,,F'.Vl L' S 17'.250 .4x3�,T 53.23" 17s�ti T -uPAI Cu;}•:..'uv I ILJ ti ,1u•+ >4, 413 6,774 ,t6u ILIT AL CAPITAL Xrt-4,i i1�"H�} >OO 2.t-14 1,7'16 72 2iB 32, 4br3 II" "j OticrN,:" E1, U'IEMCUM A "AL Al;C1- Lt lC1,11W. RED `BALANCE IAL 'l,v'il 9,981 T5 1.0UU 1.000 t00 131,446 231,946 t7 78 i Zt,412 I2t.412 71 41,,121 4b,121 66 44.929 44.928 61 14,0Oh 14.808 99 5. 711'} 5,7u0 t00 232, 069 232.969 t0 5".3,17 SP,Jk7 57 1 S, 5803,378 7B b, 461 6,461 73 94 5,2P4 94 7B,`,i2 4S,SIC b6 S B, tit 53,IAt 66 d' • 354 80,35H 78 33, Iu5 30,205 88 1,544,175 1,544,174 93 is T07, et9 11707."IB 91 76,789 761788 99 7,vuU T:000 100 7U.UV0 701000 100 14,`iu0 141500 t00 1b., "'0.; 168r28d 95 S7,h13 57,513 94 1L,oU0 12.000 Iuu i4,23; 14.233 t00 2t..UUO ZG.000 !1111 1U9y 746 109,746 97 3t*551 31,551 75 22,775 22.775 95 %,530 5,530 37 59,856 74 124,0i4 124.0t4 70 211.42+. 211,426 97 `i, hU4 11.504 91 12,540 28 .. UNE NC U'4 ',IIUr,ET FxpFNSI REpN{T - ACCUUNTI rG PFRIOL, J3 ENI)114 7t3tIt+4 79 9-13 Y-T-P Y-T-13 LUR r"(3 SfkEET U[Y[StUll I oG,:T =.T! 41,T. - at_TUAL ACTUAL TOTAL FURL>rkY` 52.349 T9 '2. 3 5 b 22.356 66 45.9'.0 112, 713 94,466 41#bSS TRAFFIC SIG`, I5I N1L IJA,.CL 99 Uv0 75.OU0 100 TOTAL PLI;j!IAL S: RV IirS TOTAL CUMMOJI IIL'' ro,,3Tt• 11,Odf) 11,4-04 3,976 (DIAL CAPITAL LXPc N.f(Iup, S E°, 60,f 4, d9b 2r 177 1,095 TOTAL IrtR Fig][ S1' r i4I .I f-rANC .'e00J , 4913 0 44,UU6 .97=) I,,4d2 13,6,'1 41171 PU'IL[L GRUJNO, se AUTIFILATt UN 2,992 2#992 80 )2,516 TOTAL VL4..1,Ill 1°kV iCl S TOTAL Ct.',TRA: rUAL }Irb JS '1.415 11.119 3,755 T117 AL C11MV)JI II LS f..OJ'3 2,498 4.178 4.778 1UTAL CAPITAL tXPt'4011oil LS :,1100 2,199 lit, 96 TOTAL ['11: L{„ „ti Ithd.S N-AUTIFILATIJ ,QUO IL%.415 td, 744 3t.N57 tt•437 1051 MAINTENANCL +IE ,,TATE :3R,HHAYS 21.450 46 21L,374 210,374 TOTAL PLk S,li'!AL Stt,Vlt 4S TUtAL CU'-'TKA_P3i.L '.9517 Z, 494 1,919 292 S, :VILi S IUTAL CUft`U,JIfit , t1,SuU 3,170 114 42 TOTAL CAI IrAL 'XV,-, it lr3kE5 'i. 5JO o,I2C 762 76z TOTAL IAINI' NA`f� 'it SIATt HIGHIAY 4 ,95(1 11,724 2e&,5 1-54 ENUIPM_NT IAI;lT'_ il'!Lt 77 TOTAL PLR �U y"L S' AV ILL IJFxL CU',T44-IUAL S,_'VIC! ; 10'.175x.015 c '5,257 7.156 TJTAL CU1>IJJ1 flt', 1, 75J 913 750 tZ9 t O(AL CAPITAL,X,'L''U1 TUR`S 1,c', iUt` J1 ), 573 c9, 784 lU.5U7 TUFAL L J`}1"M'i,T I:AT 4f 1ANLI 4r "u Ll 1,122 23 •T2G 17,6',3 55,799 17.791 POLL VEHILLt tI,LNFI .A lEt- TOTAL PL2SJ'I1L S'RVICI_, TOTAL CU71RA'.11J»L SCTIVT1-S ,310 1.5'73 1,612 454 TOTAL LU4'.UJt I1L� 'J,) L.U48 TOTAL CAp[rRt _XPr_..,7I it1p'$ 0") 7.4413 2,271 74f TOTAL PU-'L VLMLL. .,ANCL1".U8' _SeSJO 7, ;71 1.0.309 +•.680 it, 160 23.240 2:3, 3Z5 TRAFFIC S1dNAL, C �T4cLT LIGHT tilt. IJ1 AL CUN TR A. (UAL ,,.i VILiS TOTAL CU,IMJU1 I 21,1,, JJO2 50 50,676 5,941 LS TUTAL CAPITAL f-Xl'U,JI TUI{" i ,O'30 is SJU 4'1•. 9U torAL rr.A1-F•C ilt.,.AL', F ;;Tpi=F( L[F: It,SJJ Z1't4�J-i 2, 314 6Z4 i`1e 5L, 170 .V2 F LOUD CJN Id UL TJTAL CIJ:t TRA,T31AL SLkV ILLS TOTAL FLJu l Cu�lTK-JL TOTAL ST,t ELT -rIY1,IU:------------------------------------------ 4, ?',',830 1r0b6. 218 668.855 NATER ANU Stelc,{ U[1(1'i 1176, AOMINISTRATIJN ANC S(JPI'UkT TOTAL PLF.S.I;I,L S•_,{VICt), 1 ', 71, 551659 51,75' 15, 1d9 JMcXP,' r(::U UNE NC U'4 Y 3ALA`4f F E eCUMFLItLL= !JALANLE 9AL 356.404 }5b.484 79 37,376 37.976 P. 11,473 17,473 d9 2.0uu 2,000 t00 52,349 52.349 T9 '2. 3 5 b 22.356 66 1P.uUn LU#000 100 8,ot>2 8.682 99 Uv0 75.OU0 100 itS.0}d t16.03d 91 7r9bt T,961 80 12, 3ftb 1,2086 99 23.739 23,738 97 0 44,UU6 44,085 94 91d 74.9t0 75 2,992 2#992 80 )2,516 92e51b 76 4:500 4#500 l00 1J4r 926 114.926 76 4.178 4.778 TS 3:352 3,952 79 7.5•'4 7.529 77 `,,t9t 5,191 22 2(.450 21.450 46 21L,374 210,374 8l 5,506 5.506 92 Ilr500 1t,500 too 221, 31,;1 227,380 42 U u 11596.949 3.596,945 84 t7U,95,4 170,958 77 IUUCEI tXPFNS, HFPORr ACC(10NTI,1G PtRIUh U3 E tilt; 7/31/99 1v"9—Iii Y—T—O Y—T—U LU -i `t0 1VOGST EiIIMAIC ACTUAL ACTUAL MATE'. ANO SEVER �lV1S1 " I AUM1N1SrRATIt7N A'IU SJVVJRT (UTAL CU,TR;,. TUAL S, RVIC1 S 5—, 30fi 19!'546 120,377 TUTAL CU41UOI rIES 22,000 5.493 IUTAL CAPITAL c: XPc- UITUAI_S 6,313 IJTAL JLJF Ai .VIL, EXP NSC t,OJO 602169tl 149 t51), 666 Cl1s552 TUTAL duM1:ISIr r,T1-4 A .1, SUPPURr 1,414.700 353,613 289,994 MAINTLNANC, OF PUOLIC 0UIL,:(N+;S TUTAL Ptd SU6iAL SI �1Y ICJ_ 4' '675 TO, 164 10,040 TOFAL CV; TRALTuAL S,$YICES tt.000 2.745 TUTAL COMIAul TIES 11.000 644 TUTAL CAPITAL LXPEOJITORES r.0U0 2,997 1.398 TUTAL 11i,ITl. NAAL OF PUIsL3( "1111-02 1 i,675 498 16,404 12,082 MAINTEJIANLL OF GRUUN')S IUTAL OF,,,.'1:4AL SkRVICcS TJIAL CUM4 JUT Il f; r1.Jlt1 10.746 14,IbA TOTAL CAPITAL FXPLt1`)ITURI'S ', 40) 1,330 374 TOTAL '1AI,ITLNANC1 6F GRUU'40S 400 "1.810 99 t2.1^5 14,542 WATER SUPPLY V,INTE,JA,10E G RE:ATR TOTAL PU+SONAL Si RV[LtS iJ-, 405 34,596 36,116 TOTAL CLJNTKAC[UAL S.RV[L,S 229.0U0 57,243 14,275 TuTAL COMMOUITILS 0,5uU 4.115 1 858 TUTAL CAPITAL I XPC1�1,1TTUtt1"S i7 , 0170 9, 149 ' 14.996 TUTAL WATE'4 SUPPLY IiAINtr:'+ANLL L R 4)1,905 11)5,963 67,045 NATER UIST1lt'.0110N ,IA1NT. r Rt Ph. TOTAL PLR111 .AL S'RVTCI-S 135.115 33,777 35'441 TUTAL CO'ITRA:TUAL StRVTC'_S 16.600 4,149 3,191 TOTAL CO13f3UUlI 1LS 5-1,700 12'672 1V'tlb TUTAL CAPITAL t XPLJNbI flit', S 1 .000 18.999 14,614 TOTAL 442L• 01ST!180TI1. 1AINF. E 271,415 67,597 67,362 WA(LR VALVE AN11 •tYI,HAIT "'AINT. TUTAL t'tt 3'13131—JVIL�S 7- 0418 19,612 24.[313 TUTAL CUNTRA.IUAL S�PVIL(S Tun 174 TUTAL C(jM..4uu1T1t1, 173 TJTAL CAPLt AL -.XV—%I111uH 3.',701) t), O,)n 8,172 6,999 L. 740 TUTAL AATL� VALV'- A`1L ItVr;�.ANT MAIN 13 ,•470 33.'757 21.051 WATER 1'1014 1 V TAL.H1 Pil.t, RLPL. TUTAL P1-.15/,.µ2 Si EKVII LS .. `;�O 15,750 11,012 TUTAL CU71AA-It JAL 1LV VIL'S 3,.500 1,120 IUTAL COWIJ,J! 1 Il 5.404 TUTAL CAPITAL 'XPLNJIIUW S 7".1tnq 19.1193 1,114 TOTAL WATL,. ".LI _.. I ,STAL.`+FI'n.F RF _s,009 1.'•.121` b.149 33.012 17,540 EUUIPMr„{T AAI,`iTtNANC'- L CP`VAT IONS TUTAL 1'tL. S;I lwL S..1RV[C`S 111s110 1-1,271 34,771` TUTAL CU4TRA". F141 -1_RVIC' S 3, Off] 7g1J 713 TUTAL CUHs+.enllt 11-' .701; .11.90,) 22,923 21,471 TOTAL CAPITAL TXPL:'.;J1 IURI-S T. 9411 51.8815 1.319 51'95 12u'416 3,291 391 494 4.182 6,665 16 S.h Bi TC,U33 1.755 831) 14.'396 3 4, b I't 6.185 2.162 2.330 14,614 Z5,291 "'199 1.976 "1,344 tl.213 ,74 4,55'3 UNLXPE 40E0 UNENCUM 2 !iAL AilCE FNCU48ER(0 BALANCE AAL 445,923 15.687 t.UUO 491,140 1,124,708 30'634 1 u. 356 1'602 2.ODU 53,543 29,942 x.016 400 268 IU, ,689 21z.I15 1/,642 2�!,Ou4 356,060 99,674 13,409 36, 5d4 61,366 2T1.J53 50.332 SZ7 29.960 2H2OOO IOP,819 41.99H 31.096 78.4136 2 5.000 170♦580 92,313 1,247 70,229 8,000 445.913 79 15,687 71 1.000 100 491.1313 81 1.!24.706 80 30.635 75 1U.356 9q 10.602 88 2.000 100 53.593 82 28,642 67 5.026 93 400 1-00 34.265 7tJ 101'689 73 214,715 94 17.642 90 22.004 59 356.060 d4 99,674 14 13,409 M1 36,584 72 61 , 386 81 211.053 76 50.332 68 527 75 29.960 92 28,000 IOU 104.819 d0 41,998 67 31.096 85 78.486 9a 25'000 1110 176.580 87 82.333 70 2,287 76 70.229 77 6.000 100 ` UG' .LI I)PtNS' kFPORI ACCOUNT "'G P'-R1'(I) 03 1NOI1'G I/3t(A9 1 t?: 9-170 Y -T -O Y-T_Q LUP MU NATt�t A-.0 SL..'E' +jVjSjii,s 't tU(' F ",TIMATt- ACTUAL ACTUAL UNTXPLNUED M = bAt A'JCE ENCUMBkBALANC RFU riA V.NCE AAL TOTAL I-QUIP"11-+4T MAI .7t IANLE L Opl:k 2Y'•.`t10 54,942 56,961 20 e441 tb2.849 SAhITA•tY SE .sad '4A tt1T. 6 Nd'A[k 162,849 T4 TOTAL PERSo',A, S_KVIC,S TUTAL C04FRACTUAL SI kYICiS 15'195 2O, 401 0,484 TUI AL £QMlt?aUi ((L� f e Ot10 1, 749 2, 372 2,3TL 40x41}4 40.404 66 TUTAL CAPITAL t XPE'i I}I T!1k--1 't, 0011 2.247 4,706 y,5g1 4,628 4,628 bb TUTAL A U IARY it- Wt -11 MA j'JT. 4,244 4.294 48 G KEPd 7r .BSG 29,1'+1 27,479 13.447 U NAI EP SYS T' I I ice'?UVt'I NTS 49.326 49,326 64 TOT AL CAT Lf AL ' X"-,. ,+I 11tR, $ TUTAL 8A(I'• Sy --,r, y4•." t"`Vk QV=MEkIS N'Jt' 410 Oj'J ! l W 947 I ). 9`tT 444.0•)0 SA'Yl Tarty Sc bLK 1"Pr; UVI"t;-NT'i 444.UUO 444,000 444.000 100 too TUTAL PtKSJgt t- S1itV10Ei IUTAL CAULTAL XPc vD[lUk`$ Lsib TUTAL SA-•;IIA.�Y ', - F,,— �r-k F iPn')VE Mr:'JTS `t ••UUO 9'.4003, Li, 1,,-286- Z36- 95.a('0 0 c N 7�. 2R6 95.000 100 LAKs til CN 15.UJ "It.R '`LQU1 Si TI ktl 34' 7 l h 94.714 I00 FUTAL PL�y).AL :, '<VILES TU(AL £IJ'71kA:.IIIAL IC'1 `.4Ut_+ I, ,Itv )UT AL CAPt IAL LX^..' UI TU@:$ Irt. ,QUO 4.;9,gt5 1'i 410.735 ISirbgO094 '.°+00 5,SOU 100 L,3t'eU��C. TUTAL LA•.t yIC 11'A` :JAI ck AC 'Jt Sf TZ+g7 331,248 q 324: 06 t07 e44.' I,ZZ",165 I,UOitr 1.224,265 75 ,�••J r) T4�, blT T35e 541 259.389 1:OOJr 044 TS TUTAL NAT eit AivG >�N ':; IY i'�1 �> 11234,354 2.234,859 75 -----_--- ___'___—_______----_ � eSt; ,61'i L•5J4, 236 1.316,783 501.883 -___________ 5,r`,'). 8�g S.USU•A27 79 PARKL NG SYS If M J!'V t;a t'F7 ADM IN I S TRAT I'71 AriO >.J>"P,RI I,JTAL PE°.St?'.-sem ;. (VI(,, � TUTAL CU'i Tk A;. IUAL SL tV) C(:S I •135 2,411 3. 3't4 403 TUTAL £UMMUUf111S .630 15,654 S. P30 2.702 6,341 8.341 71 fUT AI tJ111 Srr ;vV lLc tN Vc P. `:c 56,8U0 56,800 4j i:,taL.A v13i '1 STS: 0 9,&'4 3rb05 05. 141 0 PARKING LUT tAl Ni L`.A"Cf 65,141 Be TOTAL PtiiJiJlL �i KVI� 1.S TUTAL £:2: TRA-IJ,,L J_^-VICi t.ti<3 375 3'72C TUTAL LLM:6IJti1LS L ,j0'j 1•Ht.8 583 3.720 91 TUTAL CAllIIAL t-Xi'c`!'.+ITUk=' �rUU`1 1.2411 325 61 hr832 8,832 83 TUTAL�Ak <17L LJ1 •i.>(�.,I isr±(; '. 3UJ l6, 81y 4u, 615 4V.t17 4:671 h,671 33 34,+ ll, th;' 41, I31 41,5'1 2h,685 26,685 40 TUTAL t'A.:dltw ,y,T' ,IYt`,I..:. 1,4'gD8 43,908 50 ___-______________________ ________________ l61 e40J 4^,347 52.411 44.'163 its 4, 044 104,044 66 ENG1•1JL.K1N5 ,IVL>13A AUMINISTRAI jiJA ,;r,1U .,PP�,t?I FUTAL CUWRAi Tl1,tL St l•.VIC. S TUI AL AJML71'i TkAt I UP^uRI 0 PWILIC 17tPKUVLA,1,l PLANNIur, 0 TUTAL PEKS414AL SINVILe1 tl 91- 91- 0 'sU 01, 1:1 'I'1r PGFNuS3t Lfp IV t ACCOUNT G PtRIaOTNi; 7l3i1o9 1'1' 9-)U Y -T-1, Y -T -O LU'� O ENGINcER11J1. OIVIz1J.. "!DG -;T T1 AT A1, TOAL iCIUAL T,3TAL PU4LIL 1.9P:'UV�MLI PLANNING 9t Pull LI(. IMPd OvLMrNT I',SP, f T11JS 91- TOTAL PERSURAL SLKVILtS 0 TOTAL PJ;ILIL I'IP- UV, ME4T INSFcC TIO 5,468- TkAFF 1., EN61%L, RI^;G T 1A1.'JTt'IANL. 0 TOTAL CO"JTKALIOAL SiPVICLS 1.494,195 TOTAL 1;<AFI=It c,il{l ic4 Rt 4' G "AINTE 86 STALET LIGNTIIJ, 71x252- IUTAL CLINIRA_TOAL SLRYICES 563- TOTAL STiEzT 1.1.,11TINf• 1,417:465 TOTAL LNGI17LLkt 1. t'IVISIINI 8t 91 REFUSL OISPUSAL .)1VIS1 1?4 SOUL) WASTE DIS"!SAL TOTAL PER SOh,1l SLI<VICLS IJIAL CU41L .{A. TJAL ,-IVTL� 1, 7v' 5.468 435s`•')8 247..115 TOTAL CU -1l h)JI 1ItS •IJU?i TAT AL SJLI, lIAS1- 01SP'SAL 1,74:s30T1 499 73,252 435,9V6 326.SJ5 1 UTAL CAP I I AL , XP_+= -Jt TU6: , TOTAL iJLIu SJAS FF i1ISP'sSAL TOTAL CAPITAL-XPr'i!)ITOR= S 111FAL SOLI:) k;AST`_ I'llT,+SAL T,JIAL CAPITAL IXP'- ;'I T'ik,S TOTAL '—XI ) WA` T: 111 S1,11 5,,L TOTAL '?LFJSi: ''1> 'SAL I Iv Cl111:; I, 741q ).i': ------------------------------------------ 415, 9`1x 326,5,5 CAPITAL 1APkOVEM-,T� OOi.NTuil:l R'. i;"Y. L _: PPIL-11 11"v` Tk OLID)^1 1.iTAL ;'Lt S,' :AL . -AV ILi S TOTAL COIL' A.:1'.iAL ',.l Vit. T,7TA1- Ca,1'111,L ' All, ;'1I'l v., S s •715 118,'1'7 413,172 T'JIAL oil. ,,, �.V1_t �7<P; r1'„ 141 s25(1 1". T„1 -L :'j L'Pii_r:T +'' IST s -TOS L7,,,2,4 4tl4, 4y5 PJ;'LI1 w`)i.KS F LILITY T 3.1 S TP UL T I''Y I U I AL CAP TT AL IAP-=': )I T+)u TUtAL OE'IT „"VIC v` -Pe h,- TOTAL PU,LII. ,..'ok; `AC3 LIIV C-NSTR it Nf_XP' SOE;) UNENC UM 3 OALAICE EP,CUMHLR.,O LiALANCE IAL Jt- 91- 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 O ii 0 0 0 131J ,64'° 1.417, 4oi l.atl♦4h5 H1 0 i43.75u 142,563 142.563 266 14:123 "1,+2H b9.927 50 3Yc, ,73 212.4"1 212.440 i0 U 0 0 91- 91- 0 8C) 5,468- 5.468- 0 123,986 1.494,195 1,494,165 86 13,931 71x252- 71:252- 563- 139,64J 1,417:465 1.417.465 8t 0 O ii 0 0 0 131J ,64'° 1.417, 4oi l.atl♦4h5 H1 0 i43.75u 142,563 142.563 266 14:123 "1,+2H b9.927 50 3Yc, ,73 212.4"1 212.440 i0 U 0 0 ))'.Er _YPLVS' 1;=P,j,I ACCOUNTISi, P'pTol' U3 N.O1N' 7131184 1119–V,T Y–T–O Y–T–L f] U4 "t) CAPIIAL Liv KUV M' T_, "ti'tOb,_T ,Tt M4r AC (UAL ALI UAL LAK-- AT LO IJ % ,AI Et: ''SrdUCT Er)x 98 ..40,0(jO ZSU,UUO F'IT AL CA'ITAL 'XVL4if TU::S 332, 1,,6 332,756 47 TUFAL JEf)T ,•.: r'.Yf��: eXP_.,E: 447,521 130 v47.S21 FUTAL LA<C 'i€C'idt. a": <+Al ct: Cit')�F1UC 100 L•047, 7h5 ('tIJM6Ll Atut,I 66 '3,500 89500 TOTAL £APIFAt 3U0 800 100 TUTAL UL -if SE.,VIC- EXpr"*!SL 11,35U /J0 28.455 TJfAt 6n3k: _I AL ': kf CJ"STi'IS£Ttts�� 47 CU:MUNI TY L til"KUVI M, TUTAL Ct, FkA: IUAL :_.t YICt_S IJTAL CAPIi AL _XVLa,t TUkf i + It°0-i 3, OUO (t,I At t=C1( dlt_. LpPEt.,L 1U.)t) 14r 448 '),244 71433 m TUI At LU `M•!x ' T TY t rtPitt_IYt-M- "TS t` •Gun n2: 444 54„ O=JU 4>.4')T 4,244 7.435 GLALPAL Eu -Far+ L TUTAL CAi'IIAL-XP_:;'"lrrtai-S TWAL -.. - - +t =AlfP t. lA1Fl<YyN ('. SU eGtJit 124, 4•)P 2.47- S•1 rUUO 124, 9')d 2.419 FUTAL CAPI[At I`w:)V, 1 .r, _____________________..____ f four 729 4')r r21R 3C� 506 COMMUNITY At40 �1VIC St..ViC`1. C Uk MUNE FY "1, U"1''., TOTAL CG'.I,t1. TUit 4t}F.it CSN"iCi1;r1U"i FY r: tf,}y },522 3,4vo . 1, , lUV 3.522 3.940 4rH OF .JULY 4 a..YIC �Y. tuts, rTC. 101 At PE.; y;f aA S':.VI'L< ful At CU'I rkA. IUAL "i 'V. u1 t�e5i•� 3, :Sf0 12,771 12,771 IUTAt C('+ —s I,JCf tt_f, °`")t' 3, F'.•4 Ii,864 1.37€ T JT it , F e T Jtt t L F t Jt IC E_V :jt,;, •, U4n i•5uh 3r471 Z. 194 }•.: U')tt +.+.60b 17,131 Hut IOAY DECO^ ,T t J!tS rJT At Lb. TIA_rJAI S h;VFC. ;; -'-PU'}" 5l0 1,xf At Cl;,l y';GI IIt; .5Ut+ 1,124 r FtlF{E �Fi,t l*'dY t_ ATE e_ 3U0 t4.1 11 350 Z,ri32 TUTAL CO:'ii'ft'+f TV .-. :" ,. lar t' +€ .,,, _______________ ------------------------------------------ 6i e4Tt= 1 5. 354 32,54', LMRAkY "t:'Vt£c.), LIt.kAkY t.Y; eA TII i„ TUTAL ")L'C s .,Y1:.. t: tF'•�i+,i IUTAL LI'.. s2!'.4U't 5'*4e E144 .�,Y �l+t. n..Ff,t'iS< Uv4 TUFAL LI,,.,Ar.Y �t:'VI_,.. ------------------------------------------ OE81 SE_kYl£E FU'itJ, 1,1140, At Jul 1„ 11–,+ --.l.J� UNLXPL."aQE=') UNEMCUM �IALA%C1. E CtIyJ;=MFU EALANE E 6AL 0 0 0 0 0 U i2:VU0 12:OU0 100 70,756 70,756 98 ..40,0(jO ZSU,UUO 100 332, 1,,6 332,756 47 447.521 447,521 130 v47.S21 447.521 100 L•047, 7h5 1,042,767 66 i•). 160 €0.160 72 1U•i6a) 10,L6U 72 2,724 2,724 l8 2.657 1,636 1N 2.J7T 2,074 34 7.445 7,444 21 2,050 2,050 100 '3,500 89500 100 3U0 800 100 Lt.350 11,35U /J0 28.455 18,454 47 2.214.4UG ?0214,400 100 2.214,400 100 2.21't.4u0 2.214.4U0 100 TUT AL OE.IT S_kvilr EXi-�f NSF TOTAL F lk c'i, r„ S P. iietvS . TOTAL PLNSTLYJ i,l.;S ------------------------------------------ UNt-XP1 NOE'') - UNENCUM ,• I,L1 r YPE14,!, h1:P 1d1 '4ALANCF ALCt1U'9TtOt.(, Phk1�?tI 03 CJ F31 iT, 7I 31l 79 TO 1') 9-77 Y_ T-0 Y-1-1) CUk 'ta DEPT SEiiY tCE F'J 3 y; +JUGzT f,it Mp T, ACTUAL ACI UAL 6c',cti AL ULC 1=,AT1)'4 t•�;n, 906.718 TO 423,184 423.184 T+)TAL UL'1T t•1"..•:•t JJI,nL 6,"L 1.1 950 296,718 355.880 182 ,4 iv -.AL .I�f_IUATIIN -, '11;0> I,l,>s958 Zv6,711; 355,6f;0 181.434 SP;:LIAL A -ILA 01) 0)l 1.561.626 94 1.56 1,626 1,56t,626 TOTAL UL:lr ,dVlt - t:t,;' c f TUTAL 10 ".I15 t5.69 A 27,t7 `, 5,530 .PLi IAL , 11 t, A�'A �,r" DS 1. '.+t`i ,'S,+,t+9 27,1('7 5.53= TOTAL DUST S�;:V1.E fU,frl-, 1,2.1 +, 7,5 322.407 383,047 187,96" PENSION FUNL'S t MPLOYLt, Pi:#',i I'a:, idiAt Ut,T *Vdl.i tXr.-:1St 6u,t la Sr tr•,3 to3r 416 41,506 T UI AL .iPLdYF-- P :S i'7: ,'. Sn . Su'< 14:,,6,,3 1(,3,416 47,509 PUL ICE P:. NS lUN� Ia,TAL ot,T r, 52`.000 341.243 107r 2r5 34,693 TU1AL ?ULi.. 1' 10, e0)�1 3+1,Z43 107.295 3Y,691 1-186Mt NS P:.dS1A_ 10AL Ut:-1 :.,-ll_ 1.6 ',030 414.243 95.374 34.-378 TOTAL i i-:_r+t_!,3 "'c aS t,1P.5 1,6;1,100 414.243 95.374 34.378 TUI AL 11k:ASIU^1 fUj.,S ------------------------------------------ 1, 7n 5,hOt) 942,129 366,015 120,579 TUT AL OE.IT S_kvilr EXi-�f NSF TOTAL F lk c'i, r„ S P. iietvS . TOTAL PLNSTLYJ i,l.;S ------------------------------------------ UNt-XP1 NOE'') - UNENCUM % '4ALANCF FNC1WB1.-11EO BALANCE 8AL t<31 s 174 831.070 TO It '174 831 .07C, 70 15.649 75,648 14 75.648 75.648 74 X06.722 906.718 TO 423,184 423.184 72 423,1C'v 423,184 72 1,417.715 1,417.715 93 1,4t7,715 1.4179715 93 1,561,626 1.561.626 94 1.56 1,626 1,56t,626 94 3,402.525 1.407.525 90 0 0 0 T:I FAC dU U;'Lr )(PC`, ' A C C i)U N T I,[:� Pr ItI 1, , 03 hS_ 4EIN (`+UIN; 7J 3IJ`+4 Y— r—n TI MA T- AC TUAC AC WAL 3'�e 4UfeZ0� 7.362. 354 3:949. 6h4 ?.T 7I♦569 General & Special Revenue Funds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Risk Management Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement, Repl. or. Repair Fund Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) Downtown Redev. Const. Fund ,1987) Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 Debt Service Funds Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION August 10, 1989 Cash & Invest. Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest. Balance B/01/89 Through Per Attached Journal Balance 7/31/89 8/10/89 List of Bills Entry 8/10/89 $ 2,237,380 $302,163 $ 507,803 <24,000> $ 2,007,74L 839,719 6,143 31,259 614,603 14,915 - 14,733 182 3,849 26,539 52,945 23,000 443 3,017,148 232,488 361,564 2,888,072 209,208 5,496 5,712 2U8,994 1,263,319 13,463 35,959 1,240,823 449,683 43,026 5,499 487,210 344,968 4,775 7,226 342,517 809 - 1,500 1,000 309 791,262 50,291 7,287 834,266 4,988 4,148 8,201 935 1,375,564 12,136 57,034 1,330,666 13,673,313 27,123 - 13,700,436 15,725,319 27,663 - 15,752,982 3,542 - - 3,542 ,39,954 ,986 jj5L456 $1.096.722 - $3913.720 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION CLEARING ACCOUNTS AVENUE BANK AND TRUST CO. OF OAK PAR WAGE DEDUCTION 85 CH 7977 CITIBANK, N.A. PYMT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT PYMT-HELFENBEIN COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 25-31 S MAIN] ST 08-12-110-001-0000 049 COURTYARD KENNICOTT VENTURE BOND REFUND C3976 BOND REFUND C3298 BOND REFUND C3298 BOND REFUND C3976 PAUL DEBEER BOND REFUND C5455 DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/10/89 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/10/89 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/10/89 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 8/10/89 DONOHUE 6 ASSOCIATES, INC. PROSP MDWS SEWER REHAB SEWER REHAB DOYLE SIGNS, INC. BOND REFUND 1037 BOND REFUND 1038 BOND REFUND 1039 BOND REFUND 1041 BOND REFUND 1042 ROBERT ESSENBERG BOND REFUND C1673 ALLAN S. FEINGOLD DUPL PARKING TICKET REFUND FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PROSPECT DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 7/27/89 DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 7/27/89 DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 7/27/89 DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 7/27/89 DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 7/27/89 FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS MED BENEFIT REIMB DEP CARE REIMB CATHY GLYNN REFUND OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL REFUND OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL HOFFMAN GROUP BOND REFUND C4256 BOND REFUND C3192 BOND REFUND C3192 BOND REFUND C3208 INVOICE AMOUNT $610.92 $6,473.43 $224.25 $7,226.31 $1,325.81 $1,450.00 $50.00 $1,200.00 $50.00 $75.00 $343,363.36 $1,726.26 $523.26 $32,213.08 $1,150.38 $1,316.82 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $10.00 $10,345.14 $141.96 $33.89 $2,849.61 $706.41 $5,270.67 $2,930.50 $38.76 $3.74 $100.00 $36.0.00 $75.00 $75.00 PAGE 1 TOTAL $610.92 $6,473.43* $224.25 * $8,552.12* * $2,750.00 $75.00 * * * $377,825.96* $2,467.20 $500.00 $100.00 $1* * * * * $14,077.01* * $8,201.17* $42.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS BOND REFUND C3208 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3203 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3203 $75.00 BOND REFUND C3201 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3201 $75.00 BOND REFUND C2796 $360.00 BOND REFUND C2796 $75.00 BOND REFUND C3860 $660.00 BOND REFUND C3860 $75.00 BOND REFUND C3792 $360.00 BOND REFUND C 3 7 9 2 $50.00 BOND REFUND C3735 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3735 $50.00 BOND REFUND C3926 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3926 $75.00 BOND REFUND C2757 $360.00 BOND REFUND C2757 $100.00 BOND REFUND C3657 $1,060.00 BOND REFUND C3657 $85.00 BOND REFUND C3733 $500.00 BOND REFUND C3733 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3658 $485.00 BOND REFUND C3658 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3656 $85.00 BOND REFUND C3656 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3939 $360.00 BOND REFUND C3939 $100.00 BOND REFUND C4107 $360.00 BOND REFUND C4107 $100.00 BOND REFUND C4051 $100.00 BOND MIKE HOFFMAN REFUND C4051 $360.00 $9,400.00 REFUND OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL $9.12 REFUND OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL $.88 $10.00 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND EMPLOYEE SHARE, IMRF 7/89 $14,457.03 EMPLOYER SHARE IMRF 7/89 $28,142.88 $42,599.91* EDWARD KURTZ BOND REFUND C5466 $58.00 $58.00 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS MICHAELS CUSTOM BUILDERS BOND REFUND C5637 $100.00 $100.00 OPUS LANDSCAPE ESCROW REFUND $42,016.00 BOND REFUND C4949 $100.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. BOND REFUND C4290 MISC EXPENSES $500.00 $42,616.00 REMODELING & REPAIR SPECIALISTS BOND REFUND C5768 $20.00 $100.00 $20.00* RMRS SYSTEM POSTAGE METER ADV DEP $3,000.00 $]Do- 0 $3,00L )0* JOHN P. ROTTER BOND REFUND C5153 $100.00 $100.00 ROYAL FUEL FUEL $7,700.39 $7,700,39* SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. OFFICE FURNITURE $559.20 $559.20 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT REINSPECT FEE C2796 $25.00 REINSPECT FEE C3201 $25-00 REINSPECT FEE C3203 $25.00 REINSPECT FEE C3208 $25.00 REINSPECT FEE C3192 $25.00 REINSPECT FEE C3298 $50.00 REINSPECT FEE C3735 $50,00 REINSPECT FEE C3792 $50.00 REINSPECT FEE C3860 $25.00 REINSPECT FEE C3926 $25,00 REINSPECT FEE C3976 $54.Q0 YORK & ASSOCIATES, INC. REINSPECT FEE C5455 SURVEYING SERVICE $25.00 $400.00 $150.00 S15C 1) CLEARING ACCOUNTS ***TOTAL** $528,723.06 GENERAL FUND $355,509.36 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $1,868.22 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $52,945.05 WATER & SEWER FUND $37,582.39 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $557.15 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $6,473.43 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $1,325.81 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 $7,226.31 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $8,201.17 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $57,034.17 ******************************************************************************************************** GENERAL FUND $1,189.83 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AAA TRAVEL AGENCY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JOHN F. DIXON PAGE 4 GROVE OFFICE MACHINES ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL EMPLYMT PHYS $80.00 PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF POLICE REGISTRATION VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION OFFICE SUPPLIES PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTO $I40.01 MISC EXPENSES ENGRAVING WORLD SUPPLIES $130.00 $130.00 GOLDEN CORRIDOR CONTRIBUTION $19.75 $19.75 RAY O'HERRON CO., INC. SUPPLIES $800.00 $800,00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENS':S $58.50 $58.50 $61.35 MTSC EXPENS'S $15.00 PICTURE PERFECT FRAME SHOPPE MISC EXPENS"S SUPPLIES $5.73 $82.08* $99.50 $99.50 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1,189.83 GENERAL FUND $1,189.83 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AAA TRAVEL AGENCY AIRFARE JOHN F. DIXON REIMB FOR REGISTRATION GROVE OFFICE MACHINES MAINT SERV AGRMT HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL EMPLYMT PHYS $80.00 EMPLYMT PHYS ILLINOIS ASSN. OF CHIEFS OF POLICE REGISTRATION ILLINOIS GFOA REGISTRATION INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF ARBORTCULTU REGISTRATION NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $11.23 MISC EXPENSES $I40.01 MISC EXPENSES $21.09 MISC EXPENSES $3.60 MISC EXPENSES XEROX CORP. MONTHY EQUITY PLAN $270.00 $210.00 $469.00 $469.00* $38.00 $38 "0 $90.00 $80.00 $170.00 $125.00 $125.00 $300.00 $300.00 $80.00 $80.00* $167.76 $167.76 $62.88 $11.23 $I40.01 $21.09 $3.60 $238.81* $139.61 $139.61 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $1,998.18 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $1,998.18 CABLE TV OPERATIONS BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS FLOWERS $27.50 $27 �O GROVE OFFICE MACHINES MAINT SERV AGRMT $76.00 $7f, m HYATT REGENCY AT GAINEY RANCH RESERVATION $77.04 $77.04* ITVA CHICAGO CHAPTER SALARY SURVEY $30.00 $30.00 LOWEL-LIGHT MANUFACTURING, INC. REPAIR $51.02 $51.02 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES REGISTRATION $225.00 $225,00* PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $78.48 MISC EXPENSES $44.00 $122.48* QUALEX, INC. FILM DEV $29.70 $29.70 APRIL RAJCZYK BOARD MTG $25.00 $25.00 JERRY RAJCZYK BOARD MTG $25.00 $25.00 ROSCOR CORPORATION MAINT AGRMT $2,200.00 $2,200.00 CABLE TV OPERATIONS ***TOTAL** $2,888.74 GENERAL FUND $2,888.74 FINANCE DEPARTMENT COMPUTERLAND DISKETTES $42.00 $42.00 GROVE OFFICE MACHINES MAINT SERV AGRMT $304.00 $304.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 392-6000 $3,483.01 $3,483.01 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COMPANY SERVICE CALL $188.70 $188.70 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFICE SUPP OFFICE SUPPLIES $251.00 $251.00 MILLER, MASON & DICKENSON, INC. ACTUARIAL & CONSULT SERV $498.00 $498.00 NATIONWIDE PAPERS PAPER $698.25 $698.25 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $17.75 $17.75* VTLLACE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10189 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT PEDERSEN & HOUPT TRF TAX TRANSACTIONS $410.00 $410.00 PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $43.95 $43.95 SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY $18.70 $1 34L 6 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. DELIVERY 816.10 $34.80 SYSTEMS FORMS, INC. VENDING LIC $452.97 $452.97 WALLACE COMPUTER SERVICES, INC. SUPPLIES $329.66 $32' 6 XEROX CORP. MONTHY EQUITY PLAN $201.39 MONT'HY EQUITY PLAN $139.61 $341.00 XLfDATACOMP INC. MAINT SERV $12.00 $12.00 FINANCE DEPARTMENT SUPPLIES ***TOTAL** $7,107.09 GENERAL FUND $7,107.09 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS $116.50 $116.50 THE DRAWING BOARD,INC. SUPPLIES $390.41 $390 1�1 R.T. JENKINS NEWSLETTER $1,340.96 $1 34L 6 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $48.28 $48.28 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICE $29.57 LEGAL NOTICES $100.10 BID NOTICE $20.00 LEGAL NOTICE $20.00 LEGAL NOTICE $29.57 $199.24 P.F. PETTIBONE & COMPANY SUPPLIES $289.55 $289.55 PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. SUPPLIES $389.80 $389.80 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $2,774.74 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $2,774,74 ******************************************************************************************************** RISK MANAGEMENT FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LIFE INS - AUGUST $1,991.14 $I,997 '.4* JACKSON, LONG & ASSOCIATES, INC. JACKSON LONG ADMIN FEES $7,122,02 $7,12;_* JACKSON, LONG & ASSOCIATES JACKSON LONG JULY 28 -AUG 1 $10,295.90 $634.00 $639.00 JACKSON LONG AUG 2-8 $9,825.11 $20,121.01* MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS $37.50 $232.95 $232.95 NORTHWEST ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY, S.C. REIMB $15.00 $18.00 $18.00 RISK MANAGEMENT $135.36 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. ***TOTAL** $29,485.12 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $29,485.12 ******************************************************************************************************** INSPECTION SERVICES ANDERSON PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL $240.00 $24C DUPAGE PHOTO BATTERY PAKS $216.00 }} $216®d0* ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. SUPPLIES $36.00 $36.00 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE PRINTING EXPENSE $634.00 $639.00 HEWLETT PACKARD TRAY $74,00 FELT FIXING $37.50 $116.50 ILLINOIS ASSOC. OF PL. HTG. CLG. CON SUBSCRIPTION $15.00 $15.00 MOTOROLA REPAIRS $135.36 $135.36 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $18.00 MISC EXPENSES $42.00 MISC EXPENSES $5.90 $65.90* PRECISION VIDEO BATTERIES $179.85 $174.85* QUALEX, INC. DEV FILM $14.26 $1 FILM DEV $5.47 $19.73 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE, DESCRIPTION INSPECTION SERVICES SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC. OFFICE FURNITURE THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION SERVICE ELEV INSPECT TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS, LTD. CENTRAL RD IMPRVMT VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES XEROX CORP. MONTHY EQUITY PLAN XL%DATACOMP INC. MAINT SERV INSPECTION SERVICES INVOICE AMOUNT $559.20 $125.00 $14,339.13 $249.77 $201.38 $12.00 ***TOTAL** GENERAL FUND $16,590.62 CAPITAL TMPRV. & REPL. FUND PAGE 8 TOTAL $559.20 $125.00 $14,339.13 $249.77 $201.38 $i: 0 $17,149.82 $559.20 POLICE DEPARTMENT ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY KEYS ARENA DISTRIBUTING COMPANY MEALS $45.33 $45.33 BP AUTOMOTIVE PARTS COMPANY, INC SUPPLIES $68.00 $68.00* CRAIG CHARAK EXPENSES $189.34 $189.34 THOMAS F. DALEY EXPENSES $8000 . $60 `'0 GOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL TESTING PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $561.35 $150.00 $561 3 GROVE OFFICE MACHINES MAINT SERV AGRMT $798.00 $150.00 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $798.00 HANSEN ASSOCIATES SERVICE AGREEMENT $420.00 $298.61 $420.00 SCOTT HIERA EXPENSES $298.61 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 392-6000 $60.00 $60.00 $150.00 392-6000 $40.00 KRES392-1070 UNIFORMS, INC. UNIFORMS $19.20 $209.20 LION LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC. FILM $811.85 $811.85 LITTLE AMERICA PRISONER FOOD - JULY $88.80 $112.15 $88.80 $112.15 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFICE SUPP SUPPLIES $30.99 SUPPLIES $25.00 $55.99 GENERAL FUND $15,866.84 ******************************************************************************************************** VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT LUND INDUSTRIES, INC. P-7 CONVERSION $789.59 P-7 CONVERSION $201.19 P-5 CONVERSION $834.55 P-5 CONVERSION $178.34 $2,003.67 MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE REPAIRS $133.00 $133.00 MIDWEST TRAINING ACADEMY REGISTRATIONS $300.00 $300 MITSUBISHI ELECTRIC SUPPLIES $294.00 �0* $29a 0 MORGAN SYSTEMS LINEN CHARGE $10.00 $10,00* MOTOROLA SERV AGRMT $1,446.48 MYCARD PHOTO I.D. PRODUCTS SERV AGRMT SUPPLIES $4,398.24 $5,844.72 NEDRUD, ILLINOIS LAW OF CRIMINAL INV PUBLICATION $140.50 $125.00 $140.50 $125.00 ORDER FROM HORDER SUPPLIES $110.78 $210.78 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $11.25 MISC EXPENSES $15.10 MISC EXPENSES $70.25 MISC EXPENSES $32,07 MISC EXPENSES $12.77 MISC EXPENSES $12.26 $153.70* QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. PRINTING EXP $37.10 $37.10 REBEL'S TROPHIES, INC. PLAQUE $62.04 $62.04 RONALD RICHARDSON EXPENSES $698.70 $698.70 ROBERT SMITH EXPENSES $60.00 $6C STATE'S ATTORNEYS APPELLATE PROSECUT 1988 COMPLAINT BOOK $35.00 $35: 0 TCI OF ILLINOIS CABLE SERV $11.51 $11.51 TRI -R SIGNS, INC. LETTERING $945.00 $945.00 TUFF-KOTE DINOL UNDERCOATING $358.00 $358.00 V & G PRINTERS INC. PRINTING EXPENSE $555.50 $555.50 XL/DATACOMP INC. MAINT SERV $60.00 $60.00 POLICE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $15,866.84 GENERAL FUND $15,866.84 ******************************************************************************************************** VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. A & J ACE HARDWARE #6160-C (N) B & H INDUSTRIES BRENT BAUER EDWARD CAVELLO CHERRY'S TRUCK PARTS CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE, INC. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER SUPPORT CENTRES NICK COSTANTINO DIXIE USA INC. JOE DONNA EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE FIRETAC SYSTEMS FRONTLINE CORPORATION GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES GROVE OFFICE MACHINES HAGEN AUTO PAINT & SUPPLY HANSEN ASSOCIATES JOHN HANSON JEFFERY HUNT - F.D. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF FIRE CH INT'L. SOC. OF FIRE SERVICE INSTR. STEVE KAMPSHROER CRAIG KOCTUBA LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFICE SUPP LUTHERAN GENERAL HOSPITAL MICROSOFT MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC. MOTOROLA VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL ELEC SUPPLIES $43.70 $43.70 OFFICE SUPPLIES $56.80 $56.80 EXPENSES $159.15 $159.15 EXPENSES $135.00 $135.00 REPAIR PARTS $242.00 $242.00 REPAIRS $496.24 $49 4 BA77-JT-2404-A $8.57 $8.57 DISKS $60.00 $60.00 TUITION $160.00 $160.00 EXPENSES $101.75 $101.75 MED SUPPLIES $52.88 $52.88 EXPENSES $101.75 $101.75 COMP EQUIP $206.00 $206.00 SUPPLIES $88.00 $88.00 PARTS $ $ EQUIP MAINT $9.00 $9.00 $9.10 $9.10 MAINT SERV AGRMT $228.00 $228.00 SUPPLIES $200.52 $200.52 SERVICE AGREEMENT $76.58 $76.58 EXPENSES $101.75 $101.75 EXPENSES $101.75 $101.75 392-6000 $50.00 CO3-0793 $75.08 CO3-0100 $197.98 437-3930 $104.11 $427.17 SUPPLIES $110.00 $110.00 REGISTRATION $60.00 $60.00 REGISTRATION $247.00 $247.00 EXPENSES $101.75 $101.75 EXPENSES $101.75 $101.75 OFFICE SUPPLIES $203.29 $203.29 REGISTRATION $20.00 $20,00 UPDATE $5.50 $5.50 CELLULAR SERVICE $28.25 $28.25 SERV AGRMT $1,446.48 SERV ACRMT $1,046.64 $2,493.12 VENDOR FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. NATIONAL FIRE/ARSON REPORT NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY OLSTEN OF CHICAGO INC. ORDER FROM HORDER PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. ERIC E. PIEE RADIO SHACK ROADWAY EXPRESS INC. RICK WELLS GREG WOJCIECHOWSKI XL/DATACOMP INC. FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE II ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SUBSCRIPTION $24.00 $24.00 PARTS $167.29 $167.29 TEMP SECRY SERVICES $801.00 TEMP SECRETARY $442.80 $1,243.80 OFFICE SUPPj.IES $39.84 $39.84 MISC EXPENSES $11.00 $11,.QO* SERVICE $48.00 $4t PARTS $133.14 $133.14 SHIPPING CHARGES $165.96 $165.96* EXPENSES $101.75 $101.75 EXPENSES $101.75 $10I.75 MAINT SERV $63.00 $63.Q0 ***TOTAL** $8,619.90 $8,595.90 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $24.00 ******************************************************************************************************** CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTEM SERVICES RENDERED -AUGUST $31,385.00 $31,385.00* CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $31,385.00 GENERAL FUND $31,385.00 ******************************************************************************************************** HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION RITA ADAMCZYK HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $3.00 $3.00 VENDOR HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ARA/CORY REFRESHMENT SERVICES LEONARD W. BAZAN REUBEN BEILKE SHARON BLAZEK BUSSE'S FLOWERS & GIFTS CAMILLE CHMELA MICHAEL DOROSH JUDY FELL HAZEL FRICKE S. C. AND JEAN GOODLING GROVE OFFICE MACHINES ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. RAY LUNDIN EARLE MATTSON RICHARD NORAK NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PARKE-DAVIS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. ELOISE PURCELL MELODI RODEN OTTO SCHERR JEANNE SHERMAN BERTHA STEIL HELEN WHITLOCK HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION GENERAL FUND PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL COFFEE $222.00 $222.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $21.00 $21.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $12.00 $12.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $9.00 $9.00 FLOWERS $48.00 $48.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $6.00 $ 0 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $9.00 $9.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $113.06 $113.06 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $6.00 $6.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $6.00 $6.00 MAINT SERV AGRMT $114.00 $114.00 392-6000 $200.00 $200.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $30.00 $30.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $12.00 $12,00 HDM DRIVER RETMB-JULY $3.00 $3.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $45.52 $45.52 MED SUPPLIES $2,371.83 $2,371.83 MISC EXPENSES $89.45 $89.45* HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $12.00 $12.00 STIPEND $150.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $12.00 $162.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $12.00 $12 1)0 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $3.00 $' O HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $6.00 $6.00 HDM DRIVER REIMB-JULY $6.00 $6.00 ***TOTAL** $3,521.86 $3,521.86 NEIL W. EASH & ASSOCIATES, INC. PROSPECT AVE CONSULTING $9,389.40 $9,389.40 VENDOR PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10%89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION GROVE OFFICE MACHINES MAINT SERV AGRMT NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. TRANSCRIBER OFFICE SUPPLIES PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES REI TITLE SERVICES TITLE SEARCH SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL MED SERVICES MAY -JULY VANS ARTISTS DESIGNERS SUPPLIES ART SUPPLIES XEROX CORP. MONTHY EQUITY PLAN PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND PAGE 13 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $76.00 $76.00 $215.96 TRAPP SIGNAL MAINT $101.08 $317.04 $18.71 $18.71* $75.00 $75.00 $3,399.99 $3,3999 $16.52 $1k .2 $139.60 $139.60 ***TOTAL** $13,432.26 $567.87 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $12,864.39 ******************************************************************************************************** STREET DIVISION AETNA TRUCK PARTS ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC, INC. AMERICAN FORESTRY ASSOCIATION ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION ATLAS BOBCAT INC. B & H INDUSTRIES BALDWIN COOKE COMPANY BOWEN HARDWARE CO BP AUTOMOTIVE PARTS COMPANY, INC BROCK TOOL COMPANY BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO. BUSSE HARDWARE PARTS $20.21 $20.21 TRAPP SIGNAL MAINT $1,968.75 $1,968.75 BROCHURES $2C * PADLOCKS $42.74 SUPPLIES $30.22 SUPPLIES $28.38 $101.34 PAVING MATERIAL $219.00 $219.00 SUPPLIES $77.24 $77.24 SUPPLIES $53.25 $53.24 SUPPLIES $79.56 $79.56 SUPPLIES $11.27 $11.27 SUPPLIES $189.33 $189.33 TOOLS $87.85 $87.85 REPAIRS $130.00 $130.00 SUPPLIES $5.62 SUPPLIES $5.62 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION CADE INDUSTRIES CLEANING SUPPLIES SUPPLIES $16.92 $28.16 $381.70 SUPPLIES $234.00 CLEANING SU°PLIES $174.21 CLEANING SUPPLIES $174.21 CLEANING SUPPLIES $174.21 CLEANING SUPPLIES $174.21 CLEANING SUPPLIES $174.21 CENTRAL POINT SOFTWARE, INC. CLEANING SUPPLIES PC TOOLS $174.20 $1,660.95 CENTRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HOUSE SUPPLIES $20.00 $20.00* CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLEANING SUPPLIES $69.76 $68.60 $69.76 CHICAGO TORO TURF & IRRIGATION, INC. PARTS $410.44 $68,60 SANDRA CLARK UNIFORM ALLOWANCE $84.51 $410.44 ARTHUR CLESEN INC.SUPPLIES CLS $320.60 $84.51 $320.60 UNIFORM RENTALS UNIFORM RENTAL $99.83 COMMONWEALTH EDISON UNIFORM RENTAL B -JT-75954 $95.37 $195.20 $5,243.06 R. L. CORTY & COMPANY B -JT-71224 REPAIRS $9,022.48 $14,265.54 COURTESY HOME CENTER HOSES $65.85 $65.85 CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLINOIS 02-14-146-02 $23.96 $23.96 DAN DEE SEWER CONSTRUCTION, INC. STORM SEWER $4.60 $10,000.00 $4 60 DOALL NORTHERN ILLINOIS STORM SEWER SERVICE $10,835.00 $20,835.00 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. LINCOLN ST BRIDGE STUDY $45.50 $2,325.85 $45.50 E. D. ETNYRE AND CO. PARTS $2,325.85 EXCEL MAINTENANCE SERVICE TURF MOWING $37.65 $8,983.00 $37.65 FOREST TREE SERVICE, INC. TREE TRIMMING $4,256.19 $8,983.00 $4,256.19 FRICK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, INC. SUPPLIES $226.38 GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO. WINDOW WASHING $79.50 $226.38 WINDOW WASHING $79.50 WINDOW WASHING $79.50 WINDOW WASHING $79.50 WINDOW WASHING $79.50 $397.50 HANDY ANDY HOME CENTER SUPPLIES $31.96 $31.96 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION STREET DIVISION $100.00 P J HARTMANN COMPANY SERVICE CALL HAULETTE TRAILERS, INC. PARTS HELM, INC. MANUALS KARCHER FERRULE LAND AND LAKES CO REFUSE DISP $480.00 REFUSE DISP $75.00 REFUSE DISP LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION UPGRADE JAMES L. LUTIGER AND ASSOCIATES SUPPLIES MEYER MATERIAL CO. SCREENINGS $96.00 GRAVEL MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST REPAIRS NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION BULLETINS NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELEC SUPPLIES -JUNE $293.88 ELEC SUPPLIES -JUNE $315.53 ELEC SUPPLIES -JUNE $128.73 ELEC SUPPLTES-JUNE $20.79 ELEC SUPPLIES -JUNE $42.89 ELEC SUPPLIES $22.00 SUPPLIES PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $37. 94 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $85.11 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $23.54 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $11.61 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $61..45 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $27.67 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $23.00 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $3.52 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $28.40 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS REGION 5 SALES & SERVICE, INC. MISC HDWR ROSEMONT GARDENS INC. SOD ROUTE 12 RENTAL CO., INC. RENTAL ROBERT SCHWAKE STONE CO., INC. LIMESTONE PAGE 15 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $100.00 $100.00 $20.61 $20.61 $172.00 $172.00 $21.35 $21.35 $480.00 $480.00 - $480.00 $1,441, 0 $75.00 $75.00* $196.24 $196.24 $707.30 $11.23 $718.53 $96.00 $96.00 $100.00 $I00.00* $131.13 $41.71 $293.88 $315.53 $128.73 $20.79 $42.89 $974.66 $22.00 $22.00* $13.00 $11.72 $37. 94 $85.11 $23.54 $11.61 $61..45 $27.67 $23.00 $3.52 $298.56 $28.40 $28.40 $18.00 $18.00 $154.80 $154.80 $50.00 $50.00 $17.93 $17.93 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 16 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION SHEPP PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL -AUG $40.00 PEST CONTROL -AUG $40.00 PEST CONTROL -AUG $40.00 PEST CONTROL -AUG $40.00 PEST CONTROL -AUG $40.00 STATE OF ILLINOIS PEST CONTROL -AUG $40.00 $24 0 BOILER INSPECTION $10.00 BOILER INSPECTION $10.00 STATE TREASURER BOILER INSPECTION CENTRAL RD CONSTR $10.00 $30.00 STANDARD PIPE & SUPPLY INC. PLBG SUPPLIES $21,721.00 $21,721.00 TCI OF ILLINOIS CABLE SERV $80.83 $80.83 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY WELDING SUPPLIES $12.75 $38.27 $12.75 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS SERVICES RENDERED $38.27 WAGNER PLUMBING & HEATING SUPPLIES I PLBG SUPPLIES $250.50 5.00 WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS SUPPLIES 0.50 $2,530.02 $2,53530.02 STREET DIVISION ***TOTAL** $86,497.45 GENERAL FUND CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $55,046.18 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $192.61 $31,258.66 ******************************************************************************************************** WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ACTION FENCE CONTRACTORS, INC. REPAIR AIRIA HERITAGE INC. FENCE MATERIAL $300.00 $300.00 AM= -LIN PRODUCTS, INC. SUPPLIES $31.40 $31.40 AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC REGISTRATION $270.00 $25.00 $270.00 ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY SUPPLIES $28.38 $25.00* BP AUTOMOTIVE PARTS COMPANY, INC SUPPLIES $189.33 $28.38 $189.33 BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE SUBSCRIPTION $73.20 $73.20 CADE INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES $234.00 $234.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION CECO DOOR DIVISION SUPPLIES $585.00 $585.00 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLEANING SUPPLIES $146.70 $146.70 GLS UNIFORM RENTALS UNIFORM RENTAL $99.83 UNIFORM RENTAL $95.37 $195.20 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BB72-JT-5608-D $146.44 BB72-JT-8548-A $11.53 $157 q7 CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT'L BK & TR. OPER & MAINT COSTS-JAWA $16,766.00 JJ VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS-JAWA $107,492.00 LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA $190,050.00 $314,308.00 R. L. CORTY & COMPANY REPAIRS $65.85 $65.85 CUES, INC. PARTS $327.13 $327.13 E & H UTILITY SALES FIRE HYDRANTS $3,220.20 $3,220.20 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP DELIVERY $39.50 $39.50 FREDRIKSEN & SONS SERVICE $20.00 $20.00 GIBSON ELECTRIC CO., INC. SERVICES RENDERED $711.00 $711.00 GROVE OFFICE MACHINES MAINT SERV AGRMT $152.00 $152.00 GREATER CHICAGO SAFETY COUNCIL SAFETY FILM $28.00 $28.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 392-6000 $300.00 577-9117 $61.11 CO3-0803 $30.63 KNAPP SHOES 255-5642 $16.15 $407.89 LOTUS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION SAFETY SHOES UPGRADE $50.00 $50.00 MCMASTER-CARR SUPPLIES $75.00 $7` 0* JOE MITCHELL BUICK, INC. PART $43.49 $5.25 $43,_.9 MOTOROLA SERVICE $91.96 $5.25 $91.96 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELEC SUPPLIES -JUNE $89.62 $89.62 NORTHWEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER & SERVIC SERVICES RENDERED $18.50 $18.50 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $73,87 OFFICE SUPPLIES $6.40 OFFICE SUPPLIES $36.96 $117.23 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICE $20.00 $20.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $22.00 $22.00* PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & EXPENSES $20.00 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $2.59 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $6.03 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $5,155.10 ******************************************************************************************************** TRAVEL & EXPENSES $33.76 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $3.40 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $40.00 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $28.12 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $5.09 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $87.54 PORTABLE TOOL SALES TRAVEL & SUPPLIES TOOL $40.65 $261.18 POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS $137.30 $405.44 $137.30 $405.44* PRIME PRINTING INC. SERVICE REQUESTS $315.00 $315.00 RAINBOW 1 HR PHOTO EXP. FILM DEV $10.49 SANTA ANITA MFG. CORP. FILM & DEV SUPPLIES $209.44 $219.93 STOUFFER ORLANDO RESORT CONVENTION HOUSING $69.61 $190.00 $69.61 ZONICS INC. RIBBONS $190.00* $328.10 $328.10 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ***TOTAL** $323,981.36 WATER & SEWER FUND $323,981.36 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION CHICAGO & NORTHWESTERN TRANS CO LAND LEASE -JULY $2,229.00 $2,229.00 GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO. WINDOW WASHING $79.50 $79.50 PYRAMID CONCRETE & BLACKTOP MAPLE ST PKG LOT $2,846.60 $2,846.60 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $5,155.10 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $5,155.10 ******************************************************************************************************** CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $3,397.10 CORPORATE PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV $1,500.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $270.00 PAGE 19 GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $162.80 $162.80 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 $420.00 $420.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION SUPPLIES $83.25 $83.25 ROUTE 12 RENTAL CO., INC. RENTAL $216.00 $216.00 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $216.00 GENERAL FUND $216.00 ******************************************************************************************************** CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS AIR PRESSURE DAMP -PROOFING SERVICE, HISTORICAL MUSEUM RESTORATION $550.00 $550.00 V. J. CENTRACCHIO & SON, INC. HISTORICAL MUSEUM RESTORATION $2,355.00 $2,355.00 COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR 08-12-110-002-0000 049 $368,97 08-I2-110-001-0000 049 $123.13 $492.10* ARMOND D. KING, INC. SERV RENDERED $1,500.00 $1,500.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $4,897.10 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $3,397.10 CORPORATE PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV $1,500.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES FOLGERS FLAG & DECORATING, INC. FLAG REMOVAL $270.00 $270.00 GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO. WINDOW WASHING $162.80 $162.80 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $420.00 $420.00 KINDER INDUSTRIAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES $19.99 $19.99 MARK PROMOTIONS SUPPLIES $83.25 $83.25 WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS BARRICADES $538.60 $538.60 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $1,494.64 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/10/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $1,494.64 ******************************************************************************************************** DEBT SERVICE FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPF.r.T FLOOD DEBT SERVICE FUNDS FLOOD LOAN B & I LOAN INTEREST D8/1/89 FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL D8/1/89 FLOOD LOAN INTEREST D9/1/89 FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL D9/1/89 $7,287.46 $970.17 $2,673.56 $949.45 $2,694.28 $7,287.46 ***TOTAL** $7,287.46 ******************************************************************************************************** PENSION FUNDS FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PROSPECT WITHHOLDING TAXES $200.00 $200.00 CHARLES W. NICK PENSION -AUG $883.22 $881 92 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SEPT MED INS $346.33 $34 3 PAUL H. WATKINS AUG DISABILITY BENEFIT $1,620.50 $1,620.50 PENSION FUNDS ***TOTAL** $3,050.05 GENERAL FUND $3,050.05 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $1,096,721.60 DATE RUN 8/10/89 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TIME RUN 12. 10-53 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING SUMMARY BY FUND 8/10/89 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $507,802.90 22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $31,258.66 23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $14,732.61 24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $52,945.05 41 WATER & SEWER FUND $361,563.75 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $5,712.25 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $35,958.55 51 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $5,498.72 53 CORPORATE PURPOSES 1989 IMPRV $1,500.00 55 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 $7,226.31 73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $8,201.17 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $57,034.17 95 FLOOD LOAN B & I $7,287.46 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $1,096,721.60 PAGE 21 ID-VAP155 P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N WHEREAS, approximately 65 people are killed each day on our nation's highways in alcohol-related crashes; and WHEREAS, during a typical year, drunk drivers kill more than 23,000 and injure nearly 540,000 Americans; and WHEREAS, Mothers Against Drunk Driving (MADD) and Volkswagen United States, Inc. have designated Saturday, September 2, of the 1989 Labor Day Weekend as the third annual DRIVE FOR LIFE day; and WHEREAS, this special 24-hour observance is designed to raise public awareness of the serious national problem posed by drunk driving; and WHEREAS, according to the National Safety Council, drunk driving fatalities increase 10 percent during Labor Day weekend; and WHEREAS, MADD and Volkswagen have asked all Americans to pledge to drive sober on this day and to continue their pledges in the future in order to actively fight drunk driving; and WHEREAS, the re,.l -u-,cess of the DRIVE FOR LIFE campaign depends on the efforts and pledges of millions of individual Americans. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. "Skip" Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim Saturday, September 2, 1989, MADD/Volkswagen DRIVE FOR LIFE day and urge all citizens of our community to drive sober as they join this national campaign to prevent drunk driving fatalities. Dated this 15th day of August, 1989. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by increasing the number of Class "W" licenses by one (1) (Mr. Beef and Pizza, 1796 South Elmhurst Road) ; so that hereinafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows: 11 Section 13.107.A. Number of Licenses Three (3) Class A Licenses Two (2) Class B Licenses Ten (10) Class C Licenses One (1) Class D License Two (2) Class E Licenses One (1) Class G License One (1) Class H License One (1) Class M License Two (2) Class P Licenses Fifteen (15) Class R Licenses Twelve (12) Class S Licenses One (1) Class T License Eight (8) Class W Licenses of SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk day of Gerald L. Farley Village President &I 1989. 0 Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JULY 28, 1989 SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE CHANGE OF OWNERSHIP - CLASS C FOREMOST LIQUORS Dr. and Mrs. Jagjit S. Kaleka and their attorney have indicated an interest in buying the Foremost Liquors franchise at Mount Prospect Plaza. Dr. Kaleka is a veterinarian in Schaumburg and is looking for another business opportunity in which his wife would be primarily responsible. Mrs. Kaleka will be the Manager of the store and will be there on most occasions. The Doctor will be there on weekends and some evenings. Neither of the Kalekas has had a Liquor License in the past. They have started the process in the Police Department to acquire a State License. They are presently incorporated in which each of them owns 50% of the business. They plan on doing some minor improvements on the inside of the store more for cosmetic and aesthetic purposes such as painting and replacing of carpeting as opposed to major renovations. The hours of operation will remain the same. They are anticipating moving in the early part of September. JOHN FULTON DIX JFD/rcw V I L L I E 0 F M OU N T P R S P E C T .COOK COUNT,Y, ILLINOIS LOCAL LIQUOR CONTROL COMMISSION APPLICATION FOR RETAIL LIQUOR DEALER'S -LICENSE RENEWAL NEW DATE July 27, 1989 ($150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of new Liquor License; one-time only fee) Honorable Carolyn H. Krause, Village President and Local Liquor Control Commissioner Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois: The undersigned, hereby makes application 11:11. a Class c. liquor dealer's license for theperiodending April 30, 1990 , and tenders the sum of $ 2,000. the prescribed fee as set forth in the following: SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (Section 13.106): Annual Fee CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00 CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00 'CLASS C: Retail package only 2,000.00 CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal, organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00 CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000.00 CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine, consumption on premises only 750.00 CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00 CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges; retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00 CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non - refrigerated beer and wine only - no consumption on premises 1,750.00 CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,000.00 CLASS 5: Restaur, t with a lounge 2,500.00 CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00 CLASS V: Retail package - wine only 1,500.00 CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only and at dining tables only 1,500.00 SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00 EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL. Your petitioner, doing business as FOREMOST LIQU15RS respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at Mount Prospect, Illinois. Description and Name of Premises: FOREMOST LIQUORS --- E _ROOM #_l 8j_2400 SQ. ,,FtE�ETL WITH 20 FEET OF FRONTAGE Description must � __""'_'9_D_e_scription must be complete as to floor, frontage, etc.) Name of Owner of Premises: MT. PROSPECT LTD PTN. If Owner of record is a land trustee, attach copy of Land Trust Agreement. If not Owner, does applicant have a lease?,,, _ State date applicant's lease expires. If not owner, attach copy of lease hereto. Is applicant an individual, . a corporation, a co -partnership, or an association? (Circle one) If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number: If co-partnershipq state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number Of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof: If a co -partnership, give tne date of the formation of the partnership: If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation:—, ILLINOIS 7/18/89 If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date qualified under Illinois Business, Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois: If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers, and Social Security Numbers of officers and directors. Also list the names, addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such corporation. NAME JAGJIT S KALEKA ADDRESS 115 SCHRIEBER AVE OFFICE AND/OR PERCENT OF STOCK HELD ROSELLE,IL 60172 ( 50% Date of Birth: 10/9/44 Social Security # 392-64-9317 Phone # 893-6826 .KARAMJEEK KAUEKA 115 SCHRIEBER AVE. ROSELLE,IL 60172 (50% Date of Birth: 5/1/52 Social Security # 387-78-7045 Phone # 893-6826 Date of Birth: Social Security # Date of Birth: Social Security, # Phone # Phone # Objects for which organization is formed: -A.J �eli �uors If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an ats�dciation, has the applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents, or stockholders ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? If so, explain: . ..... NO If applicant is an individual, state age: Marital Status: Is applicant a citizen of the United States? If a naturalized citizen, state date and place of naturalization: How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to the filing of this application? Local Address: Telephone No. State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time:760,000 How long has applicant been in this business? Is the applicant an elected public official? NO If so, state the particulars thereof: Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public official? NO In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any political contributions within the past 2 years? If so, state the particulars thereof: t Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? N() If so, designate title: Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device Stamp? _ Atp If so, state the reasons therefor: Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of subsections (a) (3) through (a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? 11io If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s): Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premises other than described in this application? No If so, state disposition of such application: Is applicant qualified to receive state and federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor business? YES Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the federal government or by any state or subdivision thereof? NO If so, explain: Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed by this Ordinance, the laws of this state or other Ordinances of this Village? -- Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United States of America, or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the conduct of his place of business? YES Does applicant currently carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? If "Yes," attach copy. If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? (If the answer to either of the foregoing questions is "No," no license shae.) Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the time of filing? State name and address of each surety next below: WESTERN SURETY CO Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application is made: KAIAM,JEET K. KALEKA . .... . 5/l/%2 . R93_687.6.3,82-7R-2n4s 115 SCHRIEBER AVE. ROSELLE, IL 60172 SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT clorporate Seal! (if applicant is corporation) Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that <he is/are the applicant for the license requested in the foregoing application; that `she is/awe of good repute, character and standing, and that answers to The qu—ons asked in the foregoing application are true and correct in every detail. STATE OF ILLINOIS ) SS. COUNTY OF COOK ) Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 7 ;1T j Notary Pu1d a o I X A.D., 19$9- Public APPLICATION APPROVED: Local Liquor ControI Commissioner This Application must be accompanied by a Surety Bond in the form attached hereto.- BOND ereto: BOND OF RETAIL DEALER IN ALCOHOLIC LIQUORS KNOW ALL MEN �Y THESE PRESENTS: THAT of the City of 6i/t- , County of 1 . z _ and State of y i.�oii hereinafter called the Principal, andAv.. .� er t r w. ,ice W of the City of , County of and State of hereinafter called the surety, are held and firmly bound unto the Village of Mount Prospect, a municipal corporation, in the sum of ONE THOUSAND DOLLARS ($1,000), for the payment whereof to the said Village of Mount Prospect, the principal and said surety bind themselves, their heirs, executors, administrators and assigns jointly and severally firmly by these presents. Signed, Sealed and dated this dF lL day of JV , A.D., 19 y WHEREAS, the above named principal has been granted a license as an alcoholic beverage dealer under the provisions of an Ordinance of the Village of Mount Prospect, entitled: "An Ordinance Relating to Malt and Vinous Beverage Dealers and Regulating and Licensing the Sale of Certain Beverages," passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village of Mount Prospect on the seventh day of April, A.D., 1934, as amended thereafter, and approved by the President of said Village on the seventh day of April, A.D., 1934, which license will expire on the thirtieth day of April, A.D., 19 NOW, THEREFORE, the condition of the foregoing obligation is such that if the said principal, his agents and employees, shall comply with all the provisions of said Ordinance hereinbefore described, and any and all other Ordinances of said Village and laws of the State of Illinois, now in force and which may hereafter be in force in said Village relating to the operation of the business of an alcoholic beverage dealer, as defined in said Ordinance; and if said principal, his agents or employees shall not violate said Ordinance or any Ordinances, rules or regulations now in force or which may hereafter be in force in said Village affecting the operation of said business, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect. )•,+„L -Ie ,t� Signed, Sealed and Delivered By:,. i.., ,(SEAL) in the Presence of: / Principalr ✓ kriZ2!--I""_, Pe, i c i i LA( EAL) By: 11 y (SEAL) STATE OF ILLINOIS ) COUNTY OF C�RaK'4 7t ) SS. A Notary Public in and for slid County in the State aforesaid, DO HEREBY CERTIFY That a Cz -e a and 4 4 kd , who are persona y known to be to be the persons whose name' are subscribed to the foregoing instrument, appeared before me this day in person and acknowledged that thesigned, sealed and delivered the said instrument as f -f ej;free and voluntary act for the uss and purposes erein set forth. d, a GIVEN under my hand and 'Vv rµ 1 /seal tt � day of Ju A.D., BOND APPROVED 19 Local Liquor Control Commissioner The Hanover insurance Companies El The Hanover insurance Comnanu --y -owl al—a %,umpany Bond No. 1781662 LICENSE OR PERMIT BOND KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, KALEKA CORP. DBA: FOREMOST LIQUORS 1141 Mt. Pros ect Plaza of Mt,. Prospect, Illinois 60056 as Principal, and C3The Hanover insurance Company (A New Hampshire Corporation) ❑Massachusetts Bay Insurance Company (A Massachusetts Corporation) as Surety, are held and firmly bound unto The Village of Mt. Prospect as Obligee, in the penal sum of , One Thousand and no/100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dollars, good and lawful money of the United States, for the payment of which sum wellandtruly to be made, we bind ourselves, and our heirs, executors, administrators, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS the said Principal has applied to said Obligee for a license to. . operate. a. liquor . NOW, THEREFORE, THE CONDITION OF THIS OBLIGATION IS SUCH, That, if Principal shall faithfully observe and honestly comply with the provisions of all Laws or Ordinances of Obligee regulating the business for which license is issued, then this obligation shall be void; otherwise to be and remain in full force and virtue. PROVIDED, THE LIABILITY OF THE SURETY upon this bond shall be and remain in full force and effect for the full period of the license, and renewals thereof, issued to the principal above named, or until ten days after receipt by the Obligee of a written notice sigr9d by -uch Surety, or its authorized agent, stating that the liability of such Surety is thereby terminated and canceled; and provided further, that nothing herein shall affect any rights or liabilities which shall have accrued under this bond prior to the date of such termination. Signed, sealed and dated the ....28th ............... day of ..... Jt4Y ............. jg.89 KALEKA CORP. DBA: FOREMOST LIQUORS ................. ................ I ......... Principal is.all C5 THE HANOVER IUSURANCE COMPANY ❑ MASSACHUSETTS BAY INSURANCE COMPANY Attorney-in-fact Form 141.0761 (1/84) The Hanover Insurance Company POWER OF ATTORNEY CERTIFIED COPY KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS: That THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of New Hampshire, does hereby constitute and appoint Kathleen L. Miller, Kay A. Hull, Charles G. Brantman or Sherri D. Davis OfChicago, Illinois, its true and lawful A ttorney(+ in- fact to sign, execute, seal, acknowledge and deliver for. and on its behalL and as its act and deed, at any place within the United States, or, if the following line be filled in, only within the area therein designated any and all bonds, recognizances, undertakings, contracts of indemnity or other writings obligatory in the nature thereof; as follows: Any such obligations in the United States, in any amount— And said Company hereby ratifies and confirms all and whatsoever said Attorney(s)-in-fact may lawfully do in the premises by virtue of these presents. , Mis apointment is made under and by authority of the following Resolution passed by the Board of Directors (if said Company at a meeting heldon the seventh day of October', 1981, a'quorum being present and voting, which resolution is still in effect: -RESOLVED. That the President w any Vice lare#idlctu4 in conjunction with any Assistant Vice President, be and they are hereby authorized and empowered to.appomt,%uornevs� m -fact of the Com pang, in its name and as its acts, to execute and acknowledge far and. on its behalf" Surety any and all oFrutances, contracts of indemnity, waivers of citation and At other writing obligatory in the nature thereof, with power to attach thereto the seal of the Company. Any such wntjjs so executed by such Attorneviom-fact Audi as bmdi'4 11110a the Company as if they had been duly executed and acknowledged by the regularly elected of the Company in their own proper persons' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY has caused these presents to be seated with its corporate seal. July attested by its Vice President and its Assistant Vice President this day Of March I q 85 19th (Seal) THE HANOVER INSURANCE COMPANY lice Pre iden t lssistan4Vice Pre dent THE COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS COUNTY OF WORCESTER On Chia 19th day Of March 1985 before me came the above named Vice President and Assistant Vice President of The Hanover Insurance Compin.s to me:—nonall.y known to be the individuals and officer: described herein, and acknowledged that the sea] affixed to the precedininstrument is the voirporate seal of The Hanover I risurance Company and that the said corporate seal and their signatures as officers were duly affixed and suh I to said !,gstnunctit by the au�oritx direction of said Corporation. (Seat) Notary Public My Commission Expires May 31, 1985 1, the undersigned Assistant Vice President of The Hanover Insurance Company, hereby certify that the above and forego1 9 is a fulL true and correct ca Of the Original Power -of Attorney issued by said Company, and do hereby furthe'r certify that the said PowerofAttornev is still in force anreffect. This Certificate may be signed by fascimile under and b authority of the following resolution of die Board of Directors of The flanoNer Insurance Company at a meeting held on the 7th day by authority -RESOLVED, That any and all Po-cesof Wornel,, and Certified Ctques, of such Powers ofAttorney and eenifiration in rvveet 1hervio. granted and executed by the Pregident oranly Vice President mc,.m, nown with anv AAMWant Vire Presiden t,,f theGon pan ' v shall he binding,mike( y to the same extent as if all signatures therron were mat u t� , affixed even though one or mere ,+f an " v _,h signaturesthereon a,, he GIVEN under my hand and the sea] of said Company, at Worcester, Massachusetts, this day of 19 FORM tat -040214/$4) Assistant Vice President V-.-%.LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEU-i PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA-39-V-89, JEFFREY R. CESARE171 LOCATION: 1813 MAYA LANE DATE: JULY 26, 1989 Mr. Cesaretti is requesting permission to have a 10 foot front yard instead of the required 30 feet so that he may install a parking pad in his front yard. Mr. Cesaretti presented his case before the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 13. He stated that his home is on a corner lot across from Aspen Park and that the park activities make it difficult to drive in and out of the driveway. He also stated that there are currently four cars in his family with another to be added soon. This proposed parking pad will, in his opinion, better facilitate exiting and entering the driveway. Planning and Zoning staff stated that a brief inspection of the neighborhood indicating no other similar parking pads in front yards. It was also noted that there are two large evergreen trees in front of this proposed parking pad that will help screen the view of this parking area from the street. The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the issue and agreed that because of the heavy use of the park across the street, it would be acceptable to allow a parking pad if screened by these large evergreen trees. The Zoning Board then voted to approve this request by a unanimous 6-0 vote. There were no neighbors or objectors present at this hearing to voice any concerns. A fence height variation was also requested and discussed at this hearing. The Zoning Board of Appeals being final in this matter, voted to approve their request. PB:hg Approved: David M. Clements, Director 11 -4(iV:J- Jvlt a u t• 27,971 1p 0 1,77 m are d6scr'Pf'4:)n "n +f,"s pl4f w.4) yout Jccj ccrt*tRcafc of f;�e; 41 -so compare alfrinfs ,V, J;r�46y,'-Orr�C,Or,wAotonCZrepor�onycij orcrux. Is *?howm 0 WhrIM4WXW0 U)rC001-Jedl� 4),0 ruJISC rffe:kti your Jeia,abs+tmt,orZ.,n;r ,3 CrE�dJ. STATE OF ILLI 013 WON r'Y OF COOK 1, ADA*,.5, j. Surve)br, k4re6y cevbF/ 4iot; r ka,10 curve� goj>e,r�.Y JCSCr;604J a66w,, arJ 4F8a�,#),o.ta+' raUjn is 4 correct reprcsenfctf;or� of Sol Su� mwo5uvvmer)tS Corredej fo +he Sfanjat-d at Rakrenhelb. MWNT PtospKr, pA"045, VC MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 39-V-89 Hearing Date: July 13, 1989 PETITIONER: Jeffrey R. Cesaretti PUBLICATION DATE: June 27, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1813 Maya Lane REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a 10, front yard instead of 30, in order to permit a parking pad and a variation from Section 21.601.A.3 to allow a 41 high fence extending to the front building line along the side street of corner lot. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Ronald Cassidy; Acting Chairman Len Petrucelli (8:10 p.m.) Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Gil Basnik OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: None Mr. Jeffrey Cesaretti, 1813 Maya Lane, Petitioner, stated that his home is on corner lot across from Aspen Park. There are currently four cars with another to be added soon in the family. Due to intense park activities and cars parked on both sides of the street during these times, Mr. Cesaretti indicated the difficulty in pulling in and out of his driveway. The danger of children running out between parked cars was also stated. A parking pad is being requested to facilitate exiting and entering the drive and to reduce the hazard of hitting a car or child. The second variation request is for a 51 high fence extended all the way to the front building line along Buckthorn Drive. After speaking with his neighbor, the Petitioner has since reduced the height to 41. A small back yard and large side yard with a lack of privacy were stated as hardships. The fence will be approximately 25, from the front sidewalk. Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that upon inspection of the neighborhood no other similar situations were dicovered in regard to the parking pad. It was noted that the two large evergreens will help to screen the pad from the street. Mr. Bednar noted that ZBA 39-V-89 Page Two the Petitioner would be gaining an additional 1,550 square feet of private enclosed space with the addition of the fence. Variations have been granted for such fence extensions, but they were on busy streets rather than residential. No precedent has been set within this neighborhood. Mr. Brettrager noted that Maya Lane is a busy street. Mr. Lannon indicated his support of the parking pad, but not the fence. Mr. Cesaretti argued that the fence is necessary for his privacy to enjoy his property without people or cars coming through his yard. He stated that he could plant bushes along -:he sidewalk and allow them to grow to heights of 8-101 and let them hang over the sidewalk. Pictures were offered with such examples of this less acceptable alternative. Upon motion by Ms. Brothers, and seconded by Ms. O'May, it was moved to grant a variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a 101 front yard instead of 301 in order to permit a parking pad. Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Brothers, Brettrager, O'May, Cassidy Nayes: None By a vote of 6-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required for this variation. Upon motion by —. 2'.attrager, seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved to grant a variation from Section 21.601.A.3 to allow a 41 high fence extending to the front building line along the side street of a corner lot. Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Brothers, Brettrager, O'May, Cassidy Nayes: Lannon By a vote of 5-1, the motion passed. The Zoning Board of Appeals is final in this case. Upon motion by Ms. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved to record this as Resolution Z-39. Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Brothers, Brettrager, O'May, Cassidy Nayes: None Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER` -�`�� SUBJECT: ZBA-39-V-89, JEFFREY R. CESARETTI LOCATION: 1813 MAYA LANE DATE: JULY 6, 1989 REOVES The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.A t o all o w a 10 f oot front yard permitting '�tinga par ad Codn normally requires a foot front yard setback. soa variation requested tedfr0Secti0n 21601 to efooth h fence extending to front building lin along the side street on a comer lot. Code normally pemtsa fence entirely behId the rear building line along the side street on a corner lot, YJLLAGE STAEE COMMENTS Both the Engineer 11 .°6 aic I Inspection Services Departments request that the width of the driveway be tapered to a maximum 21 feet at the property line. Permits will be required for both the fence construction and for any driveway construction if variations are granted. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case. This property is located at the comer of Buckthorn Drive and Maya Lane in a single family neighborhood on the northeast side of town. Across Maya Drive on the north side is a park and school site. Mr. Cesaretti is requesting two separate variations from the Zoning Code. One variation is to allow a parking pad to be constructed off the existing driveway reducing the front yard open landscaped area to 10 feet in this location. The location of this new parking pad is to be tucked in back of two large existing Blue Spruce trees. As we have stated in similar cases, the main question we have is one of hardship. The petitioner should be able to substantiate any need for the additional parking pad in this front yard. We question whether it is an inconvenience rather than a hardship that parked can would have to shuffled in and out - of the driveway in order to access the garage. Presently, the applicant has a two car garage with a two -car wide driveway. it is possible to park four cars total on the property; (two in the garage and two in the driveway.) The fact that there are two large Spruce trees located directly adjacent to this proposed parking pad, will help minimize any visual impact this parking space may have from Maya Lane. Upon a field inspection of the neighborhood, we found no other similar situations. Gil Bumuik 2 ` The second variation request is for a 5 foot fence extended all the way to the front building line along Buckthorn Drive. The applicants have stated in their application that, since they live on a corner lot, they have a small back yard for private living space. Upon a field investigation of the property, it is apparent that the allowed rear yard fenced area would be smaller than normal. If granted the variation as proposed, the applicants could gain an 1,,550 square feet of private enclosed space. Extensions of fenced yards have generally been approved in the past for comer lots when the side yard abuts the heavily traveled street. This is not the case on this particular property. There have been only a few other cases where a fence extension, such as this, has been proposed for a comer lot on two local streets. A brief inspection of the neighboring area indicated no other fenced in side yards on comer lots. In summary, Mr. Cesaretti must establish a hardship for both requests, In our opinion, the two large existing Spruce trees in the front yard will help to screen most of the visibility of a new parking pad, if it is allowed. It is also true that the large side yard along Buckthorn Drive of 1,550 square feet would not normally be fenced per the Zoning Code. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 181,3 MAYA LANE WHEREAS, Julie M and Jeffrey R. Cesaretti (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 1813 Maya Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 78 in Brickman Manor Third Addition Unit No. One, being a subdivision in the Southwest Quarter of Section 24, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to Plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook county, Illinois, on April 10, 1964 as Document Number 2144176 WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.A of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a ten foot (101) front yard instead of the required thirty feet (301) required in order to construct a parking pad in the required front yard; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 39-V-89 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of July, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Harald on the 27th day of June, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: T. -Ie President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102.a to allow a ten foot (101) front yard rather than the required thirty feet (301), which variation will permit the construction of a parking pad in the required front yard, provided that adequate screening in the form of landscaping be maintained. SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION OUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and I ZBA 39-V-89 - CAF Page 2 of 2 construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this . day of Gerald L. Farley Village President MOW Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ,1989. V-i.LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT- ZBA-41-SU-89, ZBA42-V-89, GREGORY A. MILLER LOCATION: 1419, 1423, 1435, 1443, 1447, 1451 BONITA LANE DATE: JULY 26, 1989 Mr. Miller, the developer of this subdivision, is requesting a special use for three -car garages for all the subject lots. He also requested variations to increase the size of the garages from 600 to 750 square feet for Lots 2, 3, 5 and 8. Lots 1 and 9 (1451 and 1419 Bonita) will be allowed to have garage size of 650 square feet. Also requested was a variation to allow driveway width on these subject parcels of 30 feet at the garage and then tapering to 21 feet :- t1:2 ';property line. Finally, he requested a two year time period on the subject variations rather than the 1 year period normally allowed. Mr. Miller presented his case to the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 13, 1989. He stated that in 1988 he requested and received blanket variations for Lots 1 through 9 in this subdivision for three car garages, 650 square foot garage sizes, and 30 foot driveway widths tapering to 21 feet at the property line. Ordinance # 3943, allowing these variations with basic conditions, expired on May 17, 1989. Mr. Miller is now requesting the same variations (slightly revised) that had already been approved. The petitioner also explained that a two year time period for the variations was necessary as he is a custom builder and it will probably take this length of time to build these six homes. The Board discussed the issue briefly and agreed that Lots I and 9, because of their width, should have garages held to a maximum 650 square feet. They then voted to approve the special use for the three car garages on the balance of the lots and also the subject variations on the condition that Lots 1 and 9 be allowed a maximum 650 square foot garage. No neighbors or objectors were present at this hearing to voice their concerns. Approved: David M. Clements, Director MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 41 -SU -89, 42-V-89 Hearing Date: July 13, 1989 PETITIONER: Gregory Miller PUBLICATION DATE: June 27, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1419, 1423, 1435, 1443, 1447, 1451 Bonita Avenue REQUEST: Special use for three car garages with variations from Section 14-102.8.4 to allow the size of these garages to be up to 750 square feet on lots 2,3,5 and 8 and 650 square feet on lots I and 9; and from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a maximum driveway width of 30 feet at the garage and tapering to 21 feet at the property line. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman Len Petrucelli Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May .-ABSENT: Gil Basnik OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: None Gregory Miller, 909 S. Owen, Mount Prosepct, builder for these properties, stated that he would like to continue the variances granted last year which expired in May, 1989. These large homes will be built within the Kathcon Subdivision. Two homes have been completed to date. Two lots are currently under contract and require three car garages. Mr. Miller indicated that the trend for $400,000+ homes is three car garages to keep cars off the street and safe from weather and vandalism. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, noted that these variations were granted over a year ago. Due to a recent Zoning amendment, it is now necessary that three car garages be presented as a special use. The 750 square feet garages requested are due to side load garages which require more room to maneuver. Mr. Bednar suggested that the Board may consider limiting the size of the garage and drive on lots I and 9 due to their narrow front yards. ZBA CASE 41 -SU -89, -z-V-89 Page Two The Board questioned the request for a two year time period on the variations. Mr. Miller stated that due to the time involved in custom building, only three homes will be built this year, with four expected to be built next year. These sites will not be able to be built out completely within one year's time. The homes square footage was discussed with the low end being 3100 square feet and the maximum 4500 square feet. Mr. Miller also agreed to the 650 square foot maximum garage size for lots 1 and 9. Mr. Lannon, seconded by Ms. Brothers, moved to grant a special use for the three -car garages for the balance of the lots in the Kathcon Subdivision along with the variations from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow the size of these garages to be up to 750 square feet, if they are side load garages on lots 2,3,5 and 8 and 650 square feet on lots I and 9; and from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow maximum driveway widths of 30 feet at the garage entrance, tapering to 21 feet at the property line. Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Brothers, Brettrager O'May, Cassidy Nayes: None By a vote of 6-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary ILIAGE OF MOUNT PRO%,,,C7 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPAWIMNT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASH K, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS HAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER 7:�jl= SUBJECT: ZBA41-SU-89, ZBA42-V-89, GREGORY A. MILLER LOCATION: 1419, 1423, 1435, 1443, 1447, 1451 BONITA LANE DATE: JULY 3, 1989 The applicant is requesting a special use for three -car garages for the subject lots. so requested is a variation from es ts Al Section 14.102.B.4 to allow lots number's 2, 3, 5 and 8 to have garages of 750 square feet, and allow lots I and 9 (1451 and 1419) to have garages of 650 square feet instead of a 600 square foot maximum allowed by Code. Also a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow driveway widths on these subject parcels of 30, at the garage, tapering to 21' at the property line. Code normally permits 21' driveway maximum. YELLAGE 5TAEF COMMEM Both the Engineering Department and Inspection Services Department note that a grading plan will be required for each lot. It may require that special grading treatments be used as a result of the wider driveways. The comment was also made by Village staff that 1419 and 1423 Bonita (Lots 9 and 8) be excluded from this blanket proposal due to the smaller frontage cul-de-sac location and the easements located on these properties. No other comments or objections - were received from Village staff regarding this case. QQMMEM In 1988 Mr. Miller requested and received blanket variations for lots I through 9 in the Kathcon Subdivision for three -car garages 650 square footge size and 30' driveway width, tapering to 21' at the property line. Ordinance #3943 outlines the granted variations and conditions. This Ordinance expired on May 17, 1989. Mr. Miller is before you tonight asking for the same three -car garage variations for the remaining undeveloped lots and also variations to the Zoning Code to allow extra square footage for the garages and extra width for the driveways. Gil Basnik - Page 2 Z_V,A,A July 3, 1989 Recently the Zoning Ordinance was amended to allow three -car garages as a special use rather than a variation, as was originally approved in this case. Therefore, this new proposal is for both a special use for the three -car garages and variations for the size and driveway widths. Tice only difference from the original request is that a 750 square foot maximum garage size is now proposed for lots 2, 3, 5 and 8, whereas lots I and 9 will be the same 650 square foot size originally approved in Ordinance #3943. To date, only two of the nine lots in the subdivision have been built upon. It is Mr. Miller's intent to have the three -car garage special use and subject variations on hand for each remaining lot in order to allow him the flexibility to design homes and driveways at the client's request. Lots 9 and 8 (1419 and 1423 Bonita) are located at the end of the cul-de-sac and, as a result, have narrow front yards, The Board may consider treating the from the others as was suggested by other Village staff. Perhaps two lots differently Perhaps three -car garages and wider drives are not appropriate on these two lots. Be aware that Ordinance #3943 granted three -car garages and wide drives to these lots also. Although this request differs very little from the original request that was approved in 1988, Mr. Miller has requested a 750 square foot garage size for a number of lots instead of the 650 square foot size. Tice reason for this is that a side -loading three -car garage sometimes requires more space for car maneuvering purposes. For instance, in a recent request by the Nfitroff Companies on Kermicott Place, a three -car garage was approved at a 730 square foot size because of the side -load issue. PB:hg CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTIES COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1419, 1423, 1.435, 1443,..1447 AN 1.451 BONITA LANE WHEREAS, Kathleen and Gregory A. Miller (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property commonly known as 1423, 1435, 1439, 1443 and 1147 Bonita Lane (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Properties); and WHEREAS, the Subject Properties is legally described as follows: Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 9 in Kathcon Subdivision, being a resubdivision of part of Lot "KII in Kirchoff Subdivision of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the North 10 chains of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded July 20, 1987 as Document No. 87-400753 in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a Special Use for the Subject Properties, pursuant to Section 14.102.B.4 and Section 14.1101.C.61 to permit 3 -car garages on Lots 2, 3, 5 and 8 not to exceed 750 square feet in size, and on Lots 1 and 9 3 -car garages not to exceed 650 square feet; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use (designated as ZBA Case No. 41 -SU -89) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of July, 1989, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Pros*op=ct Herald on the 27th day of June, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations in favor of the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given further consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Special Use would be in the best interest of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Properties a Special Use to permit 3 -car garages on Lots 2, 3, 5 and 8 which 3 - car garages shall not exceed 750 square feet in size and on Lots 1 and 9 3 -car garages not to exceed 650 square feet in size. SECTION THREE: With the exception of the Special Use granted 0, ZBA 41 -SU -89 Page 2 of 2 herein and the variations granted in Ordinance No. _, the Subject Property shall comply with all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations pertaining thereto. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of F 1989. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1419, 1423, 1435, 1443, 1447 AND 1451 BONITA LANE WHEREAS, Kathleen and Gregory A. Miller (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed a petition for variations with respect to property commonly known as 1423, 1435, 1439, 1443 and 1147 Bonita Lane (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Properties) and Lots 1, 2, 3, 5, 8 and 9 in Kathcon Subdivision, being a resubdivision of part of Lot "KII in Kirchoff Subdivision of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and the North 10 chains of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the plat thereof recorded July 20, 1987 as Document No. 87-400753 in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit driveway widths of 30 feet (301) at the garage, tapering to twenty- one feet (211) at the property line; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 42-V-89 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 13th day of July, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 27th day of June, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant a variation to the Subject Properties to permit the driveway width at the garage to be thirty feet (301) tapering to twenty-one feet (211) at the property line. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein and the Special Use granted by Ordinance No. , all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Properties. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction ZBA 42-V-89 Page 2 of 2 begins within two (2) years from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1989. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk CAF/ —LILAGE OF MOUNT PROsn—r PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER 'i SUBJECT: ZBA-40-V-89, ST. PAUL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH LOCATION: 100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989 St Paul Lutheran Church is proposing to demolish a portion of the existing school building on the comer of Busse and School Street in order to rebuild and modernize their school facility. As a result of this redevelopment project, all Zoning and Development Code issues must be addressed. Most of the variations requested as part of this proposal are for existing conditions, however, a few are also required as a direct result of the new school addition. Representatives of St. Paul Lutheran Church/School appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 13, 1989 and also before the Plan Commission on August 2, 1989. ZONING Mr. Bob Moore, the attorney representing the School, and six representatives presented testimony to the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 13. The variation requests are, for the most part, to leave existing conditions. However, in some instances, variations are required as a direct result of the school building expansion. For instance, the total square footage of the school building will be increased enough so that it necessitates a variation for the floor area ratio to .40 instead of .35. Also the new building height will be approximately 30 feet at some points instead of the 24 foot maximum allowed by Code. Furthermore, as a result of the larger school building, this parcel will be covered with more impervious surface (54%) than what is allowed (45%). The Village staff presented their opinion that the requested variations are reasonable in nature and should not have a negative impact upon the neighborhood. However, they did recommend to the Zoning Board of Appeals that the impervious lot surface coverage be reduced and the setbacks around the parking lot be increased. It was noted that if the parking lot setbacks were increased to meet Code Requirements (20 feet on the east property line, 25 feet on the north property tine, and 10 feet on the west property line), the impervious lot surface coverage would virtually meet the Code maximum of 45%. It is staffs understanding, that the existing asphalt parking lot is rarely, if ever, used for school parking, therefore, the size of the existing lot could be reduced without creating undue hardship. It was the general consensus of the Board to approve all the variations as requested. A few Board members were concerned over the existing "teacherage" building and the Board agreed to condition approval on restricting the rebuilding of the "teacherage" should it be John F. Dixon - Page 2 ZBA-40-V-89 August 9, 1989 more than 50% destroyed in the future. The Board then recommended approval of all variations (as identified in the hearing minutes) by a vote of 6-0. There were a number of people present in the audience, most of which were members of the St. Paul Lutheran Church, Two neighbors spoke in support of the requests. DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATIoNs The representatives of St. Paul Lutheran School appeared before the Plan Commission on August 2, 1989 requesting five Development Code modifications for this property. The Plan Commission considered each item individually. The first request was permission to construct a carriage walk 2 feet wide within the public parkway on both Busse and School Street. Staff had recommended that a 60 foot long section of carriage walk be allowed on both Busse Avenue and School Street in front of the school entrances. The Plan Commission, after much discussion, voted to recommend approving a 2 foot wide carriage walk on Busse Avenue from the west building line to the comer, and on School Street from the north building line to the comer. The second request made by the school representatives was to allow the existing Commonwealth Edison wood pole street light in lieu of Village of Mount Prospect street lighting requirements. Village staff had recommended that this item be denied in order to have a consistent street lighting program throughout the Village while eliminating overhead electrical wires. The Plan Commission voted to recommend approval by a vote of 4-2 with one abstention. The reason for the two negative votes was the bad precedent the Village would set when future street lighting requests occur. The third item considered by the Plan Commission was to omit the required curbing around the existing parking lot. Village staff had recommended that St. Paul Lutheran Church be required to install concrete curbs around the parking lot to direct both vehicles as well as storm water run-off, The Plan Commission discussed this item and voted 6-1 in favor of recommending approval of the applicant's request. The next item presented to the Plan Commission was a request to allow the existing parking lot to remain as is. The Village staff had recommended that the parking lot be brought up to Village parking lot standards and that this request be denied. Currently, the lot is in a deteriorated condition. The Plan Commission recommended that the parking lot be brought up to Village standards within one year after occupancy of the new school building by a vote of 5-2. The two negative votes were cast because it was felt the deteriorated parking lot would be a dangerous hazard to the children and others using the lot. One last remaining item regarding the construction of a drop-off area within the parkway on Busse Avenue was withdrawn at the hearing by the applicant. St. Paul Lutheran Church will ask the Board to consider inclusion in the Village replacement tree program in order to keep the replacement cost of parkway trees to a minimum. Approved: David M. Clements, Director MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 40-V-89 Hearing Date: July 13, 1989 PETITIONER: St. Paul Lutheran School SUBJECT PROPERTY: 100 South School Street REQUEST: Variations for accessory structure, floor area ratio, lot coverage, building height, side yards, rear yard, and parking lot as detailed within this text. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman Len Petrucelli Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Gil Basnik OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: Robert Moore Reverend Curt Grotheer George K. Busse Ron Fuchs Charles Walsh Virginia Karnatz John Larson Harley Cannon Roger Wishhau Mr. Robert Moore, 700 N. Wolf Road, Wheeling, Illinois, Attorney to coordinate testimony for this case, stated that many hours of work have been put into this project by those associated with St. Paul Lutheran School and the Village staff. After review of several options, it was determined to have this project recorded as a one lot parcel incorporating all requested variations. The intent is to tear down part of the existing school structure and rebuild to modernize the school facility. Reverend Grotheer, 21 South Maple, Mount Prospect, commented on the building's decay and the Code violations it suffers making it inadequate for modern education. Mr. George Busse, 12 B Country Club, Prospect Heights, Illinois, stated that the current structure no longer meets the needs of the users. Explanation was given how a committee was formed to go over costs, hire an architect, define needs, and establish fund raising. Over half of the funds necessary were achieved through fund raising. ZBA CASE 40-V-89 Page Two Ron Fuchs, School Principal, 321 S. Elm, Mount Prospect, concurred with the fact the building was no longer serviceable. Ginger Karnatz, stated that a June 20 Open House was held for the neighborhood in order to explain the building plans. Favorable comments were received with two ma- .1or concerns; first, that there not be a decrease in off-street parking and the increased traffic on School Street. Charles Walsh, 803 S. Busse, Mount Prospect, indicated that he has been working with the utilities and has secured all pertinent permits. John Larson, 570 Lake Cook Road, Deerfield, Illinois, Architect for the project, indicated that he had been retained by St. Paul to come up with the most effective plan. Existing on the site are the principal structure, which is a 2k story school, a parsonage, two existing garages, and three accessory buildings. A review of the variations ations followed. 1) The existing garage is requested to remain as is 81 from the property line. 2) To allow the existing 1,366 square foot; parsonage building to remain. 3) To allow a floor area ratio of .40 instead of .35. 4) To allow a maximum lot coverage of 54% instead of 45%, with a voluntary removal of 2000 square feet of sidewalk. 5) To allow a 30 foot building height instead of 24 feet. The main roof line will be within the 241 height, however, the proposed gables cause the variation. 6) To allow 171 side yard for the existing parsonage, which is used as a residence for a teacher and a refugee family. 7,8,9) Pertain to areas currently used for off street parking. 59 cars: can currently be parked on the surfaces used for off street parking when school is not in session and it is being used as a hard surface play area. To abide by Code and remove some of this area would cause a decrease in parking availability. Only 36 spaces would be available as compared to 59, causing the overflow to park on surrounding area streets. Mr. Larson stated that the drop -off -pickup area will be eliminated, MSD permits will be obtained and the parsonage drive will be repaved. No additional stormwater will run off to adjacent properties and existing underground tanks will be removed. Trees and sod can be incorporated into the parkway area which is a 12, strip. However, it was requested that an 18" carriage walk be, allowed to deter destruction of the sod by people leaving their cars and walking across the area. No impact on existing sever and water lines is expected. Mr. Lannon questioned the school's enrollment and requested a ten year projection. It was noted that 250 students are enrolled with an expected increase to around 400. Discussion ensued on the purpose of the parsonage. It was stated that it has been used as a multi -family residence for at least 25 years. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that the variations are being requested due to the demolition and expansion of an already non -conforming situation. Six of the nine variations are for existing ZBA CASE 40-V-89 Page Three conditions leaving three as a direct result of the new building. Currently, the parcel is broken into six individual lots of record which will be consolidatd into one lot of record. No negative impact is forseen for the neighborhood. Staff has no problem with the request except the variations to the parking lot setbacks. if landscape buffers separated the parking lot from the neighborhood, it would be an asset. If the Code requirements for the parking lot setbacks were met, then the impervious lot surface coverage would be reduced from 54% to 46%. These parking lot setbacks would be consistent with what is required for all other new and renovation projects. If the parking lot setbacks were increased from what exists, the school would still have over twice the parking it is required. Mr. Bednar noted that the first variation request for the use of an existing garage be deleted since it is within Code requirements (51). Other departments should be allowed input for the 181, carriage walk on the parkway. This item will discussed between staff and the architect. The drop off area was determined to be on the Village's right of way and some liability would be incurred with children and cars, therefore, it was determined that this item be deleted from the plans. Mr. Harley Cannon, 8 N. Louis, Mount Prospect, expressed his support of this project. Mr. Roger Wishhau, 15 S. School Street, Mount Prospect, voiced his support for the existing 01 setbacks for the paved areas. It was a consensus of the Board to approve the variations. Mr. Petrucelli and Mr. Lannon expressed concern over the existing Iteacherage, and its use. It was determined to restrict rebuilding of this Iteacheragel should it be more than 50% destroyed. Upon motion by Mr. Lannon, seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved to grant the following variations: 1) Section 14.102.8.4 to allow the existing 1,366 square foot parsonage building to remain as an accessory structure whereas Code allows a maximum size of 120 square feet with the condition that there will be no expansion or replacement of this building if damaged more than 50%. 2) Section 14.1103 to allow for a floor area ratio of .40 instead of .35; 3) Section 14.1102.E to allow a maximum lot coverage of 54% instead of 45%; 4) Section 14.1104.A to allow a 30 foot building height insted of 24 feet; 6) Section 14.1102.B.2 to allow a 17 foot exterior side yard instead of 20 feet to a building on the west property line; 6) Section 14.1102.B.2 to allow a zero foot exterior side yard instead of 20 feet for a parking lot on the east property line; 7) Section 14.1102.0 to allow a zero foot rear yard instead of 25 feet for a parking lot; 8) Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a zero foot setback for a parking lot instead of 10 feet on an interior side yard. Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Brothers, Brettrager OlMay, Cassidy Nayes: None ZBA CASE 40-V-89 Page Four By a vote of 6-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required for this case. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary VinbLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEL-i' PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD MAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER 7�= SUBJECT: ZBA-40-V-89, ST. PAUL EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH LOCATION: 100 SOUTH SCHOOL STREET DATE: JULY 3, 1989 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a number of variations from the Zoning Ordinance which include the following: 1. Section 14.102.13.1 to continue the accessory use of an existing garage 8 feet from the property line instead of 10 feet. 2. Section 14.102.B.4 to allow the existing 1,366 square foot parsonage building to remain as an accessory structure, whereas Code allows a maximum size of 120 square feet, 3. Section 14.1103 to allow a floor area ratio of .40 instead of .35. 4. Section 14.1102.E to allow a maximum lot coverage of 54% instead of 45%. 5. Section 14.1104.A to allow a 30' building height instead of 24'. 6. Section 14.1102.B.2 to allow a 17' exterior side yard instead of 20' to a building on the west property line. 7. Section 14.1102.8.2 to allow a zero feet exterior side yard instead of 20' for a parking lot on the east property line. 8. Section 14.1102.0 to allow a zero foot rear yard instead of 25' for a parking lot. 9. Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a zero foot setback for a parking lot instead of a 10' interior side yard. All of the above requests are for the purpose of demolishing and rebuilding part of the existing school building along with leaving some non -conforming zoning setbacks. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA-40-V-89 July 3, 1989 VILLAGE STAEF COMMENTS 1. Village staff notes that the drop-off/pickup area noted on the plan should be deleted. This type of situation is not allowed in a Village right-of-way and will create a liability to the Village if it is allowed. 2. An MSD permit will probably be required for the sanitary sewer hook-ups. This is a combined sewer area. Twenty four inch sewer lines are located on School Street and a 15 inch sewer line is located on Elm Street. 3. The driveway for the parsonage on Elm Street must be paved, not left as a gravel drive. 4. This new construction must not stormwater increase run-off to the adjoining residential properties. 5. Any existing underground tanks must be removed, if not being used. The Fire Department will be responsible for reviewing such requests. 6. All Development Code requirements must be met. The petitioner should make himself aware of all such standards. Items included but are not limited to nine parkway trees and sod in place of asphalt. 7. Engineering plans must indicate that existing sewer and water lines will be adequate for new building. KANNIlei G AND ZONING COMMENTS St. Paul Lutheran Church is proposing to demolish a portion of the existing school building on the comer of Busse and School Street in order to rebuild and modernize their school facility. As a result of this redevelopment project, all Zoning and Development Code issues must be addressed. Most of the variations requested as part of this proposal are for existing conditions, however, a few are also required for the new school addition. This church -owned property has been utilized as a school site for many years. It is bordered by School Street on the east, Busse Street on the south and Elm Street on the west. Single family homes abut the property to the north. The site is zoned R-1 Single Family Residential and is designated on the 'Village Comprehensive Plan as an institutional use. Presently existing on the site, is a three-story, g , ,gymnasium school bufldin that will be demolished; two- and one-story buildings, a parsonage, two garages, a little park, and an asphalt paved area used for parking and/or playground. The parcel is broken into six individual lots of record which will be consolidated into one lot of record. Gil Basnik - Page 3 ZBA-40-V-89 July 3, 1989 It is a bit unusual to have a situation where there is a school building along with two garages and an existing parsonage, all located on the same lot of record. However, after meeting with the representatives from St. Paul Lutheran Church regarding this school demolition and expansion, it was their decision to proceed as a one lot parcel requesting all required variations. Other options included filing as a PUD which allows for more than one building on a lot of record if certain conditions and standards are met. However, some of the PUD standards could not be met in this case. Another option was to have a separate lot of record for the existing parsonage building with the remaining school building being located on another lot of record. On the surface it seems logical to have the residential/parsonage building separated from the rest of the site by lot division, however, it would still require numerous variations if done in this manner. The variation requests are, for the most part, to leave existing conditions as is. However, in some instances, variations are required as a direct result of the school building expansion. For instance, the total square footage of school building will be increased from 35,790 square feet to 39,405 square feet, necessitating a variation for the floor area ratio being .40. Also, the new building height will be approximately 30 feet instead of the 24 foot maximum allowed by Code. And furthermore, this parcel will be covered with more impervious surface (54%) as a result of a larger building footprint. As a general rule, the requested variations are reasonable in nature and should not have a negative impact upon the neighborhood. However, the impervious lot coverage and setbacks around the parking lot can and should be reduced. The zero foot setbacks from the property lines to the existing parking lot should be increased to the Code requirements (20' on East, 25' on North, 10' on West.) As a result, the impervious lot surface coverage could be reduced to 46.5%. It is our understanding that this existing asphalt lot is rarely, if ever, used for school parking. The size of the existing lot could therefore be reduced without creating undo hardship. In summary, a number of the variations requested are to continue existing conditions. Some of the variations are directly related to the new building. With the exception, of increasing the existing parking lot setbacks to meet Code, we have no problem with the requests. PB:hg ivauiqmnjV Sq:SaW *noA juvILL '6861 '9Z Isn2nv `At'PsQuPOAk uuql J01ej ou aur 01 sluoEuwoi jnoX uiruoi PlIV SWO11 OSQql IAOIAOI OSVOld -unaoid immon1doi 004 SAVIIIA oqi ioptrn scall hw1ird pojinbal oqj UnIgui of pou!uuod aq of ptm lqrm .10lauluad mauv ,Io uofj3rujsuo3 oqi guipnjaul 'sluotuoAoid * u:j lot Suplird ponnbal ,lo peolm jo*j Ruq.1rd 2unsixo oqj Io i-middr oqi 'swotualinbal ftiq9ti joalls agia'11!A ,lo norl ui wowdinba lq'gfl lowls uos, qijv;)AtuourwoD jo leAojddv lsk-eAq. ivd oqj ut 3(fem-aSel' ' p .=n 'e joi isanboi v opnjaui asap TMIS fooqDs pue onuaAV assng IR alts looqaS uclaqin-I [nud -IS oqj loj suo, - opoz) iu;)tudojOAO(j snouvA 2tu Progipotu gswibai ajooW -j uoqo-d uioij Jolloi v pug Ipm noA pzqnjjV SNOULVDIJI(ION 3GOD JLK3WdOrl3A3(I S11OMA 13MUS '1OOHJS HJaOS 001 'IOOHJS 'MVd 'IS :J.33f HAS 6961 'OZ AIM :31ya TIOr HaNNVId 'SWIS '3 'laVHZ)IW UOUA voiLvuspawav AL 2riava ,Laif) Nau" 3mria awnu 'saim iouva IIOJLVNI(I-dOOJ ONMUMN3 *XNWSd 1'83902i A31H;J 3HIA MAd3a 'NOS'XZ)Vf 31NNOl NOI.'J37Il(l 93DIAN39 NOUDUSNI ':)13N39 XaflHZ) (Z) HOJLJ3H1a MOM 3119ad 'SX3aM RUM X39VNVW 3f)V'I'IU JNVJLSISgV 'STNONVf *3 '13VHZ)IN :OJ. SIOURU '3aadSOJd )UROW INBUWVd3G DMNOZ aNV!)MNNvM I n r $W?YaAO af)V'l ROBERT F. MOORE AMON" AT LAW AD. WHEELM, EL W= 312-215-1433 FAX 312-215-1432 July 19, 1989 Village of Mount Prospect Plan Commission 100 South Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Re: St. Paul Lutheran Church Gentlemen: Please accept this letter as a request for consideration regarding certain standards set forth in your development code. a) The property owner would request that a carriage walk be permitted within the parkways; b) The street lighting requested be fulfilled thru the installation of the standard Commonwealth Edison equipment; c) The existingarking lot be allowed to remain in its existing condition; ;4cAP*dAf 04voptAl PfIV0.1fat ct-ri. d) The parkway trees be installed on a replacement basis; e) Impervious surface in parkways opposite school entrance and consideration given to the drop-off area within the parkway on Busse Street. Yo s t uly, Robert F. Moo RFM: kw VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA-43-Z-89, ARTHUR F. MC MANUS, LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF KENSINGTON, EAST OF RUSSELL STREET DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989 Mr. McManus is requesting the rezoning from B-2 Office to B-4 Business Retail and Service District in order to construct a full -serve car wash on this property. This case was presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals on both July 13 and again on July 27, 1989. Mr. Robert DiLeonardi represented the petitioner as his attorney. Also testifying as expert witnesses were Ms. Jane Matteson, an architect and land planner for the project, Mr. Donald Reese a supplier of the car wash equipment, Mr. Joe Zgonina, the Engineer for the project and Mr. Art McManus, the contract purchaser of the property, also testified. In summary, it is L,c peti,;onees opinion that this proposed car wash at this location would not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood. Mr. McManus testified that this car wash would be a "state of the art" operation which would cost approximately $1,400,000. A colored rendering and landscape plan were presented, and Mr. McManus believes that these demonstrate the quality of the development. The Planning and Zoning staff presented comments on the application. The staff noted that the existing B-2 District was the most appropriate zoning classification for the site. The B-2 District allows only office development, and staff believes an office development would be more appropriate for this area than a commercial car wash. Staff also noted that the petitioner should be prepared to conduct an engineering study of sewer capacity in this area, so as to demonstrate the car wash is not contributing to sewer capacity problems. There were approximately 250 residents in the audience, none of which spoke in support of the proposal. Approximately one dozen of these residents approached the Board to voice different concerns of this proposal. In summary, most comments included: 1. Increased traffic on the nearby residential streets and Kensington Road; 2. The impact that a B-4 zoning designation would have on the neighboring single family area, the possible uses that a B-4 designation would allow in the future; 3. A concern for storm sewer capacity in the area; John F. Dixon - Page 2 ZBA-43-Z-89 August 9, 1989 4. Decreased home values as a result of this car wash. After hearing all testimony and resident's concerns, the Zoning Board proceeded to read through the standards for a rezoning. It was a general consensus that the standards for rezoning could not be met with this proposal and therefore, the request for rezoning was denied unanimously 5-0 with one abstention. Chairman Basnik abstained due to his absence at the July 13 meeting, whereby he did not hear the petitioner's presentation. PB:hg Approved: David M. Clements, Director MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-43-Z-89 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: July 27, 1989 Arthur McManus North Side of Kensington East of Russell Street June 27, 1989 Rezoning from B-2 Office District to B-4 Retail and Service District. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Marilyn O'May Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Len Petrucelli Approximately 250 Residents Chairman Basnik discussed the public hearing procedures to be used with the evening's hearings. The Chairman stated that due to the continuation of this public hearing, be would convene this meeting with the staff report by the Planning and Zoning Department and then accept comments by members of the audience. The Chairman said that due to the large size of the audience, he would appreciate that comments be limited to the details ,of the rezoning and that residents not repeat issues brought up by other individuals. The Chairman indicated that at approximately 9:00 P -M., he would ask that the hearing be continued to a future date if progress was not being made to a timely completion of the petition, Mr, Basnik then asked for staff comments by Planner Paul Bednar. Mr. Bednar stated that the property was a one acre site adjacent to Kindercare and across the street from a residential use. This property was resubdivided and rezoned to B-2 in 1988, The Comprehensive Plan states that this site is best suited for general commercial use. Mr. Bednar stated the zoning classification in the area is generally B-2, whereas the car wash would need a B4 zoning. This kind of zoning would be an intrusion in a residential area. Mr. Bednar also noted that any additional development would require a more detailed study of the sewer capacity in the area, This updated study will have to be done by the petitioner and approved by Public Works and Engineering. Mr. Bednar stated, however,, that this was a problem for those departments and not the Zoning Board. Mr. John Woytovich, 1718 North Russell Street, objected to the rezoning for the following reasons: Poor location; located in a residential area; increased traffic; overtaxed sewer capacity; and decreased home values. Mr. Woytovich presented a petition with 709 signatures from residents in the area. Case No. ZBA-43-Z-89 Page 2 of 3 Mr. Frank Bischof, 404 North Elmhurst, a real estate appraiser, objected to the rezoning for the reason that a B-4 use would require the widening of Kensington to four lanes. In his professional opinion, this would lower the market value of homes in the area. Further, he noted the close proximity of similar car washes along Kensington and Euclid. Mr. George Watanabe, 607 Prospect Manor, noted that several omissions were made in the last meeting's minutes. These included the reference to the deceleration lanes and the number of gallons of sewage that would be dumped in the storm sewer system. Also the retention pond that was stated by petitioner was not mentioned in the minutes. Mr. Watanabe stated that the petitioner had mentioned that sanitary water would be 1000/c reclaimed. Mr. Watanabe researched this system, finding that it would not be feasible or recommended. Further, he brought up the traffic issue and the need for a deceleration lane going east on Kensington which he felt could not be accom, modated. Mr. Charles Peterson, 606 Prospect Manor, objected to the rezoning for the reason that previous car washes had already failed in the area, one of which was within a half mile and was now an unsightly vacant, building. He also noted his association with the Clean Stream Commission and its goals to promote the health, safety and general welfare of Mount Prospect, which he felt should be considered at this time. Mr. Harry Demien, 711 North Pine Street, objected to the rezoning because of traffic problems and the high number of accidents within the area. Mr. Roger Gunderson, 604 North Russel, Street, objected stating that the Prospect Manor area was considered a floodplain. Further' he mentioned that homesites and quality of life were looked at by most residents beforethey bought in the area, and that was a real concern to them now. Mr. Al Muehlfeld, 713 North Eastwood, objected to the rezoning stating that the petitioner poorly addressed the traffic problem. He then went on to give a detailed analysis of the number of cars necessary to make this particular business profitable. He felt current conditions on Kensington would not support, such -a user He pointed out that an increase in traffic on Kensington may result in increased traffic on nearby residential streets causing a safety hazard. Mr. Floyd Halberg, 518 North Wille objected to the rezoning because of further danger to neighborhood children due to increased traffic along Kensington and residential streets. Ms. Jill Hoff, 713 North Russel Street, objected to the rezoning due to the uncertainty of the future of a B4 District. Pis. Elaine Lee, 204 North Russel Stra�zj*;jjjrag-gi�6@* as a or safity-h—azard. Mr. Craig Copstien, 623 North Elmhurst, objected to the rezoning for reasons of increased burden on the existing sewer system in the area. Mr. Copstien, a resident for about 22 years, cited specific examples of floods in past history. He also noted that Kensington already took on the identity of a speedway. Mr. Robert Newman, titttrigmW�"', astv— ME no trattic woutd, in the turn the Case No. ZBA43-Z-89 Page 3 of 3 property onto Kensington. Another concern was that the petitioner's figures about the current traffic on Kensington were inaccurate. Mr. Drago1jub Radic, 719 North Wille, objected to the rezoning due to increased traffic which would make it impossible for him to exit from his driveway. Mr. Arthur McManus (petitioner), 1327 Lama Lane, was then allowed to rebut previous comments. Mr. McManus reiterated his traffic count as 17,000 cars in a 24 hour period. He felt his car wash would not cause a significant increase in the area. At the most this traffic increase would be of 11/2% a day. With regard to sewer problems, Mr. McManus stated he understood there was already a problem and would pay for any studies that would be needed. He also reiterated his intention to install a 100% reclaim system. Mr. McManus mentioned the Plan Commission's desire to see an office building on the site. However, he mentioned he had spoken with the owner of the property and that no inquiries into this type of use had been made. He also mentioned that the car wash building would not be an unsightly building. He showed the artist's rendering, and spoke of the landscape berms and hidden driveway to ensure that the site would not detract from the beauty in the area. Mr. McManus also stated that the other car washes in the area were connected to gas stations and could not compare with the services he offers. He closed by stating that Kensington is currently a major thoroughfare and the safety of children is already a concern in the area before his car wash has even been built. Ms. Catherine Korn, 2700 River Road, Des Plaines, the petitioner's attorney then stated that the petitioner's witnesses who were at the previous meeting were here this evening and would be available for any discussion. At this point, there was general discussion among the Board members concerning this case. The Board proceeded through the standards for deciding such a case. Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Brettrager moved to approve a request for rezoning from B-2, Office District to B4 Business Retail and Service District to allow a full -serve car wash to be constructed on a vacant parcel. Upon roll call: AYES: None NAYS: Brothers, O'May, Brettrager, Cassidy, and Lannon ABSTENTION: Basnik , By a vote of 5-0 with one abstention, the motion was denied. Village Board action Will be required in this case. Jatkso4 Stephen U. McNellis, FcoAng Se Secretary ary Recording Secreta MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 43-Z-89 PETITIONER: PUBLICATION DATE: SUBJECT PROPERTY: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: Hearing Date: July 13, 1989 Arthur F. McManus June 27, 1989 North Side of Kensington East of Russell Street Rezoning from B-2 Office District to B-4 Business Retail and Service District. Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman Len Petrucelli Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May Gil Basnik Full Audience Mr. Robert DeLeonardi, 2700 Rider Road, Des Plaines, Illinois, - Attorney for the Petitioner, stated that they are requesting rezoning from B-2 Office District to B-4 Business Retail and Service District for a 38,000+ square foot vacant parcel on the north side of Kensington Road. This rezoning is to allow a car wash and no variations have been requested. Ms. Jane Matheson, 194 Woodcrest Court, Bloomingdale, Illinois, Architect and Land Planner for the project, presented several exhibits explaining the proposed car wash. Exhibit #1 - Land Use and zoning Map - displayed the uses within the area and the zoning attached to each parcel. Exhibit #2 showed the Site Plan, recently revised after discussions with Kindercare (direct neighbors). The site occupies approximately one acre and the total building area is just under 6,000 square feet and will cover about 15% of the lot. The total landscaped area is 28%. 11 employee parking spaces have been included with 25 stacking spaces. 34 vehicles can be stacked on the property under peak conditions. Entrance and exit will be from one curb cut on Kensington. No parking will be allowed in the front of the building and it will be set back 75 feet from the south property line. The customer base will be drawn from the existing traffic flow on Kensington Road. ZBA CASE 43-Z-89 Page Two Exhibit #3 showed the Elevations. It was explained that the proposed site would offer a full-service automatic tunnel car wash. Patrons would leave their car as it was automatically taken through the car wash with state-of-the-art, equipment. All work done on the cars will he done internally within the building. The car wash uses a total water reclamation system, all water used will be recycled. Exhibit #4 displayed a Panoramic View of the surrounding area depicting the well maintained homes within view of the proposed site. Exhibit #5 showed Building Elevations which reflect the outer appearance of the building. The building is done completely in face brick, it is completely non. -combustible with a pre --cast concrete roof. Exhibit #6 displayed the Landscape Plan which consists of two berms in the front of the building to protect the single .family home directly across the street. An Archftectual Rendering was displayed for the Board's review. It was the opinion of Ms. Matheson, as Land Planner, that this use would develop the property to its maximum potential without any negative impact. rhe existing laird uses indicate several areas of B-4 Zoning and automobile 'uses,; in specific, the Jiffy Lube, Goodyear Tire and Firestone. All are on the west- side of Rand Road, but all fall in the same neighborhood region and the same traffic pattern. According to Ms. Matheson, the commerical uses definitely influence this site rather than the courtyard Office building, which maintains a vacancy rate. No signs of adverse impact can be found within this area due to the zoning and no adverse impact is anticipated with the proposed use. The proposed car wash, in the opinion of Ms. 'Matheson, is of the same general intensity as the surrounding uses. All services renderer take place within the building, there .is no storage on site, no equipment is maintained on site and no deliveries are stockpiled, unlike the high intensity of handy Andy, which is basically warehousing within a B-1 District. The proposed car wash would serve as a buffer to the single family homes from the existing Bandy Andy use with less intensity in retail sales of products, more landscaping will be provided and the building is more residential in nature rather than commercial. Mr. Art McManus, 1.327 Llama 'Lane, Mount P-ospcct, Illinois, Owner, testified that the hours of operation would be .six days a week from 8»00 a.m. until 7:00 p.m. and Sunday from 9;00 a.m. until 4:00 p.m. Eight employees are anticipated, including a full-time manager. A fenced in area on the northwest corner of the property will be used for refuse.. Mr. 'McManus highlighted the employment opportunities for Mount Prospect residents and charity days that will be instituted for the benefit of the community. Estimated cost of the car wash will be $1,400,000. Real estate takes are estimated at approximately $45,000 per year. ZBA CASE 43-Z-89 Page Three Mr. Donald Reese, 522 Allen Lane, Arlington Heights, Illinois, Supplier of the equipment for this car wash, stated that the equipment would be state-of-the-art all cloth. There will be no sewer, Village or or MSD, hook up for the car wash itself, which would be 100% water reclamation. Estimated sewer use is approximately 200 gallons per day from the washroom and shower facilities. Mr. Joseph Zgonina, 2500 W. Higgins Road, Suite 420, Hoffman Estates, Illinois, retained to do the engineering and traffic aspects of this case, stated that drainage flows to the northwest on a flat surface into an existing 121, storm sewer. No surface water run-off would be discharged onto any adjacent land uses. The parcel is 28% open space and on-site detention will be required. On-site fire hydrants will also be required and agreed to. The existing sewer system will be more than adequate for this site. It was noted that a car wash is dependent on the time of day, the time of year and more importantly, the type of weather. Peak traffic periods now occur between 7:15 a.m. and 8:15 a.m. and again between 4:30 p.m. and 5:30 p.m. The peak Period of this intended land use is from 10:30 a.m. on a Saturday until 2:30 p.m. The use would compete with shopper traffic from Randhurst which is already on the road and not with the work to home traffic. It is important to remember that this type of land use does not generate the same volume of traffic day in and day out due to its dependencies listed above. It was Mr. Zgonina's opinion that this use would not impact either the utility system or the adjacent roadway improvements. This case, was at this time, continued until the Regular Meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 27, 1989 at 8:00 p.m. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary -.-ALILAGE OF MOUNT PROSP&-,T PLANMG An ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, linnots TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA43.Z-89, ARTHUR F. MC MANUS, LOCATION: NORTH SIDE OF KENSINGTON, EAST OF RUSSELL STREET DATE: JULY 6, 1989 REQUEST The applicant is requesting to rezone this vacant parcel from B-2 Office to B-4 Business Retail and Service District in order to construct a full -serve car wash. 3ILL&GE STAFF COMMENTS The major concerns of Village staff came from the Public Works and Engineering Departments. They have stated that there will be no tie-ins to the existing sanitary or combined storm sewers along Kensington with this type of use, unless there is an adequate study done of the existing sewer capacity by the applicant himself. The homeowners to the south of Kensington have had sewer problems in the past and it is a major concern of the Village not to add to this problem. Other comments are as follows: 1. Detention will be required and must connect to the KinderCare Day Care Center system to the west. 2. State Highway permits will be required for any curbcuts. 3. The entranceway off of Kensington will be limited to a maximum of 24 feet wide at the property line. The radius of the entrance could be a maximum of 25 feet. 4. A Metropolitan Sanitary District permit will be inquired. 5. The driveway must "pitch" into the site from the property line in order to avoid dripping water from cars flowing on to the Kensington Road right-of-way. There is a potential icing problem in the winter. 6. All Development Code requirements must be met as part of this proposal and shall include but are not limited to future street lights, sidewalks and three parkway trees. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA43-Z-99 July 6, 1999 Kensinton Road just east Chis parcel is slightly under one acre in size and is joc deKinde e pay Care Center on. of Russell Street.. It is adjacent to the recently comp which is zoned B-2 to the site to the north, vacant Prope' the west, the Handy Andyon rezoned along with the family residential neighbosicran 'm1988 sandhw Kensington Rase r. The and a single of the Tung Reubdi parcel wasp ro erty north of Kensington. srcel from. single family to B-� B ceisand�isll p District in the ssm t;)ffice. KinderCare P Commercial/ office. Plan identifies this subject parcel suited for G an the corn of Elmhurst Road and east of Elmhurst Avenue as beuag All parcels between Elmhurst Avenue and the banek d B-3 whereas the Handy Andy ton Avenue are zoned B.2 B�iness Office, The bank building and Road and Kenning old. Bob Evans Restaurant) restaurant building parcel is zoned B-1.to nesting a rezoning from B-2 Business Clffieoe Districtisis required for Mr. McManus is req A B 4 Zoning the site plan submitted construct a 5,746 square foot full-service carom As evidenced by there are no variations with this application. any type of cation €orcn,use, such as, a car and the app ra nate zoning for this be inconsistent with the surrounding less rcel is the current B-2 Business It is our opinion that the most appropriate o B-4 atible with the single family residential office zoning. To rezone this P opinion, that a car wash intense zoning distHcts. It would also be' furthermore, it is our op ton Rand should be neighborhood to the souti of this or this site. ng Rand Road and Route an flats parcel is not the best use for this from the heavy come al uses found alomg wash is an intense of a transitional nature homes south of the subject site. A full-service car pe in this g3, to the single family of s s south noise and lighting, and should not be p commercial use in terms le family neighborhood has existed errs necessitates greater concern and sensitivity to transitional area. The fact that an old established sing specifically, this parcel. In our south of Kensington Road for many y on Road, what is developed an the north strip e of Buss ens arcel to B-4, would be allowing existing zoning B-2 Business t�ffice, reflects that concern for the single opinion, the across Kensington. Rezoning this p family neighborhood compatible with the surrounding uses. development not compi be ort this rezoning request. Mr, McManus acceptabl es to Plan In summary, we cannot supe requirements and p use for being able to meet all Zoning Code req lar, however, the overi�ding issue is and should be, the inappropriate and z landscape plan, Parcel with this proposal. and zoning for PB:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER:f-j��&L SUBJECT: ZBA-44-SU-89, ZBA-45-V-89, WILLIAM V. MATTSON LOCATION: 410 SOUTH MEIER ROAD DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989 The applicant is requesting a special use to allow a four -car garage and variations to allow a 980 square foot garage instead of 600 feet, and a 39 foot driveway width at the garage instead of 21 feet. This case was presented by Mr. Mattson to the Zoning Board at the July 27, 1989 hearing. Mr. Mattson stated that he wanted to upgrade his home and garage on his 3/4 of an acre lot. He currently has a substandard garage and attached shed. He felt that it would be better to build a :,urge enough to house all of his vehicles and garden equipment, rather than park cars outside and store garden equipment in a separate shed. The Village staff stated that their main concern was the rarity of other four -car garages in the Village. However, it was also stated that this property is 3/4 of an acre large and could accommodate this larger garage without impacting the neighbors if properly screened with landscaping. The Zoning Board of Appeals asked the applicant about the possibility of future subdivision of this lot. The petitioner satisfied that Board that he had no intention of subdividing this lot in the future. The Board also told Mr. Mattson that a business would not be allowed to be operated out of this garage. The Board then voted unanimously (6-0) to approve both the special use and the variations as noted. There were no neighbors or objectors present to voice their concerns at this hearing. PB:hg Approved: David M. Clements 1 en:'Er•��.�f t2' d' - -- + u df. — 7 t,C6=� #!W COW.—) J. Y rP►t E�asT D� WMA-4tilt 1 - } + t `ntf it zi MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-44-SU-89 and Hearing Date: July 27, 1989 ZBA-45-V-89 PETITIONER: William and Louise Mattson SUBJECT PROPERTY* 410 South Meier Road PUBLICATION DATE: July 12, 1989 REQUEST: Special Use per Section 14.1101.0.6 to allow a four -car garage and a variation from Section 14.102.13.4 to allow a 980 square foot garage instead of 600 square feet as permitted by Code. Also a variation from Section 14.116.C. is requested to allow a 39 foot wide driveway instead of a 21 foot width normally allowed by Code. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Marilyn O'May Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager ABSENT: Len Petrucelli INTERESTED PARTIES: None William Mattson, 410 South Meier Road, petitioner stated that he wanted to upgrade his 3/4 acre lot, specifically his three -car garage which is currently sub -standard. He felt it would be better to increase the size of his garage rather than build a shed on his property which would jeopardize the existing park -like setting and would possibly obstruct the view of neighboring Craig Court residents. The petitioner's neighbors had no objections to the proposed improvements. Paul Bednar, Village of Mount Prospect Planner, stated that the Village's main concern is that of the rarity of other four -car garages and the precedent that may evolve. Mr. Bednar also stated that a 3/4 acre lot could accommodate this larger garage without encroaching into required yards and impacting the neighbors, if properly landscaped. The Board queried the petitioner on the likelihood of his subdividing the land. The petitioner satisfied the Board that he had no intentions of subdividing the lot. Some members of the Board had questions whether the petitioner might possibly start another business in this new garage. The petitioner responded that he had no such interest. Case No. ZBA-44-SU-89 and ZBA-45-V-89 Page 2 of 2 Upon a motion by Ms. O'May, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved to grant a special use to allow a four -car garage as per Section 14.110I.C.6. Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May NAYS: None By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. Upon a motion by Ms. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Cassidy, it was moved to grant a variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 980 square foot garage instead of 600 square feet as permitted by Code, and a variation from Section 14.116,0 to allow a 39 foot wide driveway instead of 21 foot normally allowed by Code, as indicated on Exhibit #1, Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May NAYS: None By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. John Ratcliffe Jackson Stephen M. McNellis Recording Secretary Recording Secretary ',,,....CAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE._..,1 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER 1 SUBJECT: ZBA-44-SU-89, ZBA45-V-89, WILLIAM V. MATTSON LOCATION: 410 SOUTH MEIER ROAD DATE: JULY 20, 1989 The applicant is requesting a special use to allow a four -car garage as per Section 14.1106.C.6 and a variation from Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 980 square foot garage instead of 600 square feet as permitted by Code. Also a variation from Section 14.116.0 is requested to allow a 39 foot wide driveway instead of 21 feet normally allowed by Code. VILLAGE TCOMMENTS Both Engineering and Inspection Services Departments note that a grading plan will be required. No over -land drainage flow from west to east will be allowed to be altered by this garage addition. Permits will be required for any construction done on the property. No other comments were received regarding this case. The Mattson's are proposing a large building addition. As part of this plan, they propose to replace the existing two -car garage *h an attached four -car garage of approximately 980 square feet in area. Also requested as part of this proposal is a driveway width of 30 feet at the garage rather than the normal 21 foot drive width allowed by Code. The application states that there are four cars (two collector cars) along with a camping trailer in the family. The Zoning Ordinance allows for camping trailers on single family lots if housed in garages. It is the Mattson's desire to garage all of these vehicles. This parcel is approximately 3/4 of an acre in size and is zoned R-1 Single Family surrounded by other single family lots. This particular lot is twice the width of some of the adjacent lots to the north and also is very deep (260 feet). The existing home and garage are of a modest size (approximately 2,000 square feet). The proposed addition to the house, along with the new attached four -car garage will be located in back of the existing house. As indicated on the site plan, there will be a resultant rear yard setback from the garage to the property line of 125 feet. The garage will be 75 feet from the south property line and 80 feet from the north property line. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA44-SU-89, ZBA45.V-89 July 20, 1989 Our main concern with this proposal is the rarity of other four -car garages in the Village. Although three -car garages are becoming more common with newer homes, there is only one other instance of a four -car attached garage being allowed recently. The garage request, being a special use, does not require hardship, however, the standards for a special use request must be met. The most important of these standards with respect to this garage, is the impact it will have on the surrounding properties. Upon a field inspection, we found a large park -like setting on the back half of this property. The amount of open land which is available to landscape could help minimize any adverse impact upon the surrounding properties. With ample space to provide landscape screening, it is possible to screen off most views of this extra -large garage and driveway from the adjacent properties. It will be difficult and nearly impossible to see either the driveway or garage from the street itself. For these reasons, we do not expect a significant impact upon the neighborhood, if approved. In summary, the Mattsons are requesting a special use to allow a large four -car gar -age and subsequent variations that will be necessary if the special use permit is approved. Our main concern is the precedent setting that may occur, if approved. The other option of storing the RV vehicle and/or collector cars off the property still exists. On the other hand, this lot is approximately 3/4 of an acre in size and can accommodate the proposed additions if properly screened with landscaping without impacting the neighborhood significantly. The resultant rear and side yard setbacks will still be in excess of the Code minimum requirements. PB:hg 0 WiLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEc- PLANPIING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER 1�11.) 161� FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNERL, ,,w SUBJECT: ZBA48-V-89, MARK HOCIN LOCATION: 1808 CREE LANE DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989 The applicant is requesting the following three variations from the Zoning Code. 1. A variation to allow an 18 foot wide driveway for a one car garage instead of the maximum 15 feet. 2. A variation to allow a 7 foot front yard instead of a 30 foot front yard in order to provide a parking pad for vehicles. 3. A variation to allow a one foot side yard instead of a 6.3 foot side yard for the same parking pad. This case was pres-nted to the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 27, 1989. The Village staff presented alternatives to the proposed parking pad to the Zoning Board. It would be possible but very difficult to expand the existing garage to a two car garage. It would also be possible but difficult to construct a new garage in the rear and extend the driveway around the side of the house. These two options do necessitate variations as well. Staff also pointed out that similar homes with similar sized garages in this neighborhood, do not have the same driveway width or parking pad as is proposed here. The maximum driveway width found in this neighborhood for similar homes is approximately 12 feet. Staff concluded that if the Zoning Board feels that another parking space should be allowed for this property, it would be logical to locate in approximately the location proposed. However, the main question is whether the width should be 18 feet and not 15 feet to meet Code. The Board discussed the existing parkway tree and the distance between this tree and the new proposed driveway. They felt that a 3 foot minimum setback from the property line would be necessary to both save the parkway tree and to construct a retaining wall to hold back the steep slope. The Board then voted to approve this request with the minimum 3 foot side yard by a unanimous 6-0 vote. Thee were no neighbors or objectors present at this hearing. Approved: David M. Clements, Director s 7- mw*$.nuoeNo SONS ARE NOT TO K ASIUMW FROM SCALING No 63908 0, 40 foot WAY 28 f40111 .A*V van"., elw o ((trice .9,SA� C, hance (SolkHhff{Y ,, 2.76 chain n Iwo J— . pu LIC A Al pr LOT 251 trice, pod aorwej*v fence parF on r� West" face, of row a 69 fa vv WLDING UNES ANO EASEMENTS ARE SIHOWN ONLY WHERE THEY ARE SO RECORDED IN THE MAPS, OTHERWISE REFER TO YOUR DEEJ OR ABSTRACT Owit"wo 04 a low wd wa, WA*4"v Al Oictmolk ow fmwoftl, 0000 41:10. IL AS 3pe: .1?.r Al.r JDF ;rATE I o COMPARE ALL POINTS BEFORE INALOING By SAME ANO X ANY OIFFEAENCE Stato of 1111roois County of coo Wo, COMFIED SURVEY CO. ISO N"Oby Os"Ity survoyod the stogKom, ftwAbod PASIX10Y W4 th4d It dame" va a carrot wommionlatilo, r*o survw 7k, bor. it k MINU'T'ES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-48-V-89 Hearing Date: July 27, 1989 PETITIONER: Mark Hocin SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1808 Cree Lane PUBLICATION DATE: July 12, 1989 REQUEST: A variation from Section 14.3016 of the Zoning Code in order to allow an 18 foot driveway width for a ane -car garage instead of '15 feet as allowed by Code. Also requested is a variation from Section 14.1102,A to allow a 7 foot front yard for the purposes of a parking pad instead of a 30 fool front yard setback as required by Code. Also a variation requested. from Section 14,1102.8 to allow a one foot side yard for the parking pad instead of 6.3 foot side yard setback as required by Code. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: lbertChairman PLannon Ronald Cassidy Marilyn O'May Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager ABSENT: Len Petrucelli INTERESTED PARTIES: None Mark Hocin (petitioner)„ 1808 Cree Lane, stated his requests and also noted that he had spoken with his neighbors and that they did not mind his proceeding with construction of his wider driveway. Paul Bednar, Village Planner, noted that in terms of yard variances, you are not allowed to pot a parking pad in a regular front or side yard. He did note however, that to expand an existing garage would be very difficult. He also noted that it would be difficult, but not impossible, to put the new garage in the rear yard. Mr. Bednar stated his main concern was whether another parking space be allowed on this property, given its constraints, and if so, should the driveway be allowed 18 feet wide rather than 15 feet, There was some general discussion concerning the close proximity of what would be the new driveway to an existing tree on a public parkway. The Board discussed approving this variationwith the stipulation that the closest the parking pad would be allowed to the side Case No., ZBA-48-V-89 Page'2 of 2 UPOTI roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Lannon and G'May NAYS: Cassidy and Brothers By a vote of 4-2 the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May NAYS: None By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. Upon a motion by Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved to enter the case of the 18 foot driveway width for a one - car garage as Resolution Z-48-89, Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May NAYS: None By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. 6 -4 Stephen M. McNFIH-s—�' Recording Secretary �—&Ctt'c A �, Jackson 14M R cording SeVretary "LIAGE OF MOUNT PROW -T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMEN Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: FROM: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C RMAN PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNkR SUBJECT: ZBA48-V.89, MARK HOCIN LOCATION: 1808 CREE LANE DATE: JULY 20, 1989 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a 18 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage instead of a maximum 15 feet. Also requested is a variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a 7 foot front yard in order to provide a parking pad instead a 30 foot normally required. And finally, a variation from Section 14.1102.13 to allow a I foot side yard for the purposes of the parking pad instead of 6.3 foot side yard as per Code. Mr. Hocin is proposing to increase the width of the driveway from the existing 9 feet to that proposed in order to have an additional parking space on his property. VILLAGE STAFF 7QA!?�BENTS The Engineering Department notes that the drive apron, as proposed on the site plan, will not be allowed to extend past Mr. Hocin's property line. A retaining wall will also be necessary on the edge of this new pavement in order to prevent erosion. They also noted that no fill shall be placed within 3 feet of the side property line, since the drainage pattern along this property line cannot be altered. For this reason, the width of the pavement near the front property line should be decreased. The Inspection Services Department notes that permits will be required b8fore any construction begins. No other comments were received from Village staff regarding this case. PL&IHNING A�M ZG COMMENIS The Hocin's live in a single family home typical of other homes in this single family neighborhood. They have a one -car attached garage which is depressed below grade. 'Mere is also a 9 foot wide driveway leading into the garage. Mr. Hocin is requesting to widen the existing driveway to 18 feet to allow more than two automobiles to be parked in the driveway over night Technically, the Code allows a 15 foot wide drive if centered in front of the one -car garage. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA48-V-89 July 24, 1989 It would be difficult to either expand the size of the garage or build a detached garage in the rear yard. An expansion of the existing garage would not only require variations to the side yard setbacks, but also may be impractical cost -wise and require extensive engineering. The option of converting this existing garage space to living space and building a new detached garage in the rear yard may be possible, however, it may be very difficult to extend a new driveway around the side of the house with the grade problems that exist right now. A widening of the existing driveway in front of the house may be the most practical way to provide another parking space. However, the question the :Board must deal with is whether another parking space on this property is necessary, and if so, is 18 feet necessary?. Upon a field inspection of six or seven other similar houses on this same street, we found none had parking pads similar to that proposed here. Only one other home with a similar one -car attached depressed garage had a driveway wider than 10 feet at approximately a 13 foot width. The current garage and driveway space on the Hocin's property will permit at least two and probably three vehicles to park off-street. The petitioner should address whether or a 15 foot width will help solve his problem. If a variation is granted for the driveway width and yard setbacks, a hardship must be established. In summary, the Hocin's don't have many reasonable options other than an expanded driveway width if they are to provide an additional parking space on their property. However, the quest:...,a the 3oard must answer is whether or not an additional parking space is necessary and if so, is 1.8 feet necessary? The precedent has not been set for a similar parking pad in this neighborhood. If approved, the driveway width could not extend over the property line and should be held back at least 3 feet from the side property lines in ord to allow for proper drainage, and to ensure the survival of the parkway tree. SME,r —ILAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL,4 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEd SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF AND EUCLID DATE: AUGUST 9, 1989 Amoco Oil Company had received a rezoning, special use and variations approximately one year ago to construct a new food mart, self -serve gas station at this comer. After receiving approval from the Village Board, the Illinois Department of Transportation (1.13,07.) determined that much of this lot is in a floodplain. As a result, Amoco has to provide detention areas on the property that are closer to the building than allowed, and they also have a finished floor elevation of their new building that is not high enough above the floodplain level to meet Code. Amoco recently appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals for zoning relief and the Plan Commission for Development Code modifications. MMAR#_Jw� = The representative for Amoco Oil appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on July 27, 1989 to request a variation from the floodway requirements and also a one-year extension for the previously granted variations on this property (Ord. #3980). As unusual as it may seem, the Zoning Board is responsible for reviewing variations from floodway requirements. The Village requires a finished floor in a building to be 2 feet above a floodplain level. Amoco's building is proposed to be one foot above this level. The Village staff feels comfortable with a one foot elevation above floodplain level rather than two feet since this rule was established mainly for residential. Staff also informed the Zoning Board that the originally approved landscaping plan had been revised as a result of the new detention areas on the perimeter. It was staffs recommendation that this landscaping plan be further revised and approved by staff. The staff also supported the one-year extension for the previously approved variations. The Zoning Board of Appeals had no questions and proceeded to approve all requests unanimously by a vote of 6-0. There were neighbors of this property present in the audience, however, no one objected to the request. John F. Dixon - Page August 9, 1989 DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION Representatives of Amoco appeared before the Plan Commission on July 19, 1989 to request three Development Code modifications. The first request would allow a 1% detention basin slope which the Plan Commission recommended for approval by a unanimous vote of 8-0. The second item would allow a three to one side slope in the detention basin which the Plan Commission also recommended approving unanimously by a vote of 8-0 but made their approval subject to review and approval by staff. Finally, the third Development Code modification would allow the new gas station to be located within 75 feet of this detention basin. After some discussion among the Commission members regarding the close proximity of this detention basin to the neighboring residents to the south, some of the members could not support this request. The commission voted to recommend approval of this item by a vote of 6-2, however, they made their vote contingent upon further staff review and written notification of adjacent property owners. Since this hearing, the Planning and Zoning staff has notified all adjacent property owners of these Development Code requests. PB:hg Approved: °�. r{1� Davzd -MClements, Director-- MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-49-V-89 Hearing Date: July 27, 1989 PETITIONER: Amoco Oil Company SUBJECT PROPERTY: Southwest comer of Wolf and Euclid PUBLICATION DATE: July 12, 1989 REQUEST: A variation from Section 22.806 to allow revised site plans for the food mart, gas station conforming to I.D.O.T. floodway requirements. Also a variation from Section 16.405 of the Development Code in order to allow a site plan modifications conforming to I.D.O.T, requirements and also a variation from Section 14.604.B. to allow for an extension of one year for the previously granted variations to this property- ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Marilyn O'May Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager ABSENT: Len Petrucelli INTERESTED PARTIES: None John B. Murphey, attorney for Amoco, the petitioner, stated that I.D.O.T. determined that much of this lot is in a floodplain. 'The Village requires a finished floor of a building to be 2 feet above the flood level. Amoco's building is to be 1 foot above this level. He stated that this rule, as he understands from the Village, is mainly for residential. Mr. Murphey also stated that construction would not be able to begin within the one year allowed for the previously granted variations to this property, Paul Bednar, Village Planner, stated that the Engineering Department felt that it was acceptable to have a 1 foot floor height rather than 2 feet since this was meant primarily for residences. This separation of I foot is from the finished floor to the floodplain level. Mr. Bednar also mentioned that landscaping could be improved even further than it already had. He said that if the Board approves the variation for the floor height, they should also make the landscaping a conditional part of this approval. Mr. Bednar also stated that the Planning Department did not foresee any problems with the approaching expiration date for the variations to the property. The petitioners should be allowed an extension due to abnormal circumstances. Case No. ZBA49-V-89 Page 2 of 2 Upon motion by Mr. Unnon, seconded by lis. ED May it was moved to grant variations from, Section 22.806 to allow revised site plans for the food mart, gas station conforming to 1.D.O.T. floodway requirements, Section 16,405 of the Development Code in order to allow site plan modifications confirming to i.iA.O.T. requirements, and Section 14.604.E to allow for an extension of l year for the previously granted variations to this property. 'Upon roll call: AYES: Basni tr Brettra er, Lannon, (YMay, Cassidy, and Brothers NA'B'S: None By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed Village Board action will be required in this case. Stephen M. McNe , ._._ .. n p ars Ratc i ackson Recording Secretary / cording retary :,i VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C IRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA49-V-89, AMOCO OIL COMPANY LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF AND EUCLID DATE: JULY 20, 1989 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 22.806, Water, Sewer and Floodplain regulations. This Section requires that any new construction have a finished floor at least 2 feet above the floodplain level. The new building's finished floor is proposed to be I foot above the floodplain level as designated by the Illinois Department of Transportation. Section 22.809 outlines the procedure for variations from the Floodplain regulations. It states that the Zoning Board of Appeals is responsible for reviewing such a request. One other variation is requested from Section 14.604.13 of the Zoning Code which would allow a one year extension of the previously approved variations for this property. Ordinance No. 3980 was passed September 20, 1988 and expires within one year unless permits are issued. MUM MK-Gamaw The Village Engineering Department is chiefly responsible for reviewing building plans with regards to Federal, State and local floodplain regulations. The northeast section of this property as indicated by the diagonal line cutting across the property on the site improvement plan has been determined to be within a floodplain by the Illinois Department of Transportation -Division of Waterways. The high water level of this floodplain is determined to be 643.4; whereas the proposed finished floor elevation of the new building is to be 644.4. This one foot difference in elevation does not meet the requirements set forth under Section 22.806 where a 2 foot height abo, e te flood level is required for all finished floors. The Engineering Department has reviewed the floodplain elevation on this property and the proposed building elevation and does not have a problem with the request. Although the Village of Mount Prospect floodplain regulations require finished floors to be two feet above floodplain levels, this regulation in their opinion was developed more so for residential buildings. The Engineering Department also notes that the FEMA regulations only require a building finished floor to be at or above the level of a 100 year floodplain. NIPC (the Northeastern Illinois Planning Commission) recommends the one foot elevation above the 100 year floodplain. The Village of Mount Prospect standards are higher than both of these other agencies. Therefore, the Village Engineering Department feels comfortable granting a variance from our standards in this instance. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA49-V-89 July 20, 1989 This is an unusual request for the Zoning Board of Appeals to be reviewing. As stated above, Section 22.809 of the Municipal Code requires that variations to the Village floodplain regulations be reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Planning and Zoning Department has no expertise in reviewing floodplain variations, so we must rely heavily on the Engineering Department's comments. Since they have no objection to this request, neither do we. As a result of a large portion of this site being located in the floodplain, additional detention basins were required in the perimeter yards. These detention basins are located on what was originally intended to be perimeter landscaped treatments. The possibility of these basins being wet from time to time has necessitated a revised landscape plan from what was originally approved. Although the intent of this revised landscape plan is the same as the original, it is our opinion that it can be improved. We would suggest that, if the Board recommended approval of the variation to the floodplain regulations, they condition such approval upon a landscape plan approved by the staff. The Plan Commission recently reviewed modifications to the Development Code section with regards to the slope of the detention basins and the distance from these basins to the proposed building. It is also worth noting that the Village recently received a copy of a letter written by the Cobk County Department of Highways to the Amoco Oil project engineers. This letter conditioned any permit approval on the removal of the east drive on Euclid Avenue. When this driveway area is removed, it will provide additional frontage area along Euclid Avenue which could also accommodate more landscaping. Furthermore, we have no problem with granting the request to allow a one-year extension to the previously approved variations for this property. Unforseen circumstances, such as the determination that a large portion of this site was in a floodplain, slowed down the progress of this new building. PB:hg X_ 1AGE OF MOUNT PROVE,—, PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois I- 1—io C.14 C. TO: MICHAEL JANONIS, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER HERB WEEKS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR CHUCK BENCIC, INSPECTION SERVICES DIRECTOR LONNIE JACKSON, DEPUTY FIRE CHIEF BOB PSZANKA, ENGINEERING COORDINATOR KAREN DIET, CABLE ADMINISTRATOR CAROL FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER �.5 7 DATE: JUNE 27, 1989 SUBJECT: AMOCO OIL COMPANY, 1631 EAST EUCLID AVENUE VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATIONS The applicant, Amoco Oil Company, is requesting three Development Code modifications to permit this site, located on the southwest corner of Euclid and Wolf, to be redeveloped according to revised plans as of April 27, 1989. The Development Code modifications being sought are to permit a dry detention basin floor slope of not less than 1%; building no closer than 50 feet to the detention facility and building no closer than 1-1/2 feet from finished floor and the floodway limit. See the attached site plan for additional information. Please review and return your comments to me no later than Wednesday, July 5. We plan to have this before the Plan Commission on Wednesday, July 19, Thank you. MES:bg Eric. x*M3a. t t viwA an a+opm t I aONaAV OI70na ZSVa T£9T `ANVdwoo ZIO OOOW'd dOHS 000-4 OOOWv opo � + o0 IoM atotw • PAMMOUM .wwm TAM a as 74" W30M ma ONOMMO MOM r ----Paa�c a attsrw i" 3d onvt 3Ntit KUW3 U30M cm ONOMMO xww aws� U30M me ONONMO XNV S3tv�3 3dM,OM+7 tw v� I wM3 swo tt xia at3a 'r r i1q swan 430 M mm _ j�j We: w" lmkw s odww p t arw 1larom t # am mon _ .urs. ,Mao 99 4 A.VWO 3w MUM it r Sara a axwu cm s 0 xN OMM 'a am Nm n - - Ava wwwo K I jx j dOHS 000-4 OOOWv opo � + o0 IoM atotw • PAMMOUM .wwm TAM a as 74" W30M ma ONOMMO MOM r ----Paa�c a attsrw i" 3d onvt 3Ntit KUW3 U30M cm ONOMMO xww aws� U30M me ONONMO XNV S3tv�3 3dM,OM+7 tw v� I Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Man4ger FROM: Director Public works DATE: August 9, 1989 SUBJ: Disposal of surplus equipment NWMC Auction The Northwest Municipal Conference will be conducting their annual fall auction on Saturday, September 16, 1989 at the Arlington Heights Public Works Facility. There are eight (8) vehicles scheduled for this years auction, all of which have been replaced by new vehicles this past summer. Six (6) of the units are old Police Department units and the other.two (2) are public works units. The Public works Department will have another two (2) units to delclare surplus by next year. Their replacement units will not be in service for an estimated three months. The attached ordinance will have to be approved by the Village Board to allow these units to.be sold. Herbert L. Weeks Public Works Director cc: Police Chief AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no longer necessary or useful to or for the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of the personal property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS it has been determined by the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to sell said person- al property at a public auction to be held on Saturday, Septem- ber 16, 1989. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT: SECTION ONE: Pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois Municipal code, Illinois Revised Statutes, C24, Section 11-76-4, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect find thatIthe personal property described on the attached form now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, is no longer neces- sary or useful to the Village of Mount Prospect, and the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect will be served by its sale. SECTION TWO: Pursuant to said Section 11-76-4, the Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sell the aforemen- tioned personal property now owned by the Village of mount Pros- pect, at public auction on Saturday, September 16, 1989 at the Arlington Hts. Public Works, 222 Ridge in Arlington, 11:00 AM to the highest bidder on said personal property. SECTION THREE: The Village'Manager is hereby authorized and may direct the Northwest Municipal Conference to advertise the sale of the aforementioned personal property in a newspaper published within the community before the date of said public auction. SECTION FOUR: The Village Manager is hereby authorized and may direct the Northwest Municipal Conference to enter into an agreement for the sale of said personal property. The auction shall be conducted in the manner set forth in the Specifications for the sale of vehicles attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: No bid which is less than the minimum value set forth in list of property to be sold shall be accepted, unless a lower amount is authorized by the Village Manager or his representative at the auction. SECTION SIX: Upon payment of the full auction price, the Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to convey and transfer title to the aforesaid personal property, to the suc- cessful bidder. SECTION SEVEN: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, by a vote of at least three- fourths of the corporate authorities, and approved in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1989 Mayor ATTEST: Village Clerk Surplus Equipment Listing August 9, 1989 Vehicle Number Serial Number Year Make Model Min. Price P-1 GlBL5169HX218515 1987 Chevrolet Caprice 1500 P-7 GlBL5164HXZ18809 1987 Chevrolet Caprice 1500 P-11 GlBL5167HA158866 1987 Chevrolet- Caprice 1500 P-15 GIOL516XHX218684 1987 Chevrolet Caprice 1500 P-13 GiBN35H1FX141484 1985 Chevrolet Caprice 1000 I-23 G1BL69Z4FH135652 1985 Chevrolet Impala 1000 4534 T-1089 1984 Bombardier - 100 301 GlAB68CBEA113446 19841 Chevrolet Chevette 500 caf/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZE THE DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no longer necessary or useful to or in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of the personal property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to sell said personal property as part of a multi -fire department sale to be held on August 18, 1989 to the highest bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois Revised Statutes, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby declare the following equipment and miscellaneous items no longer useful nor necessary to said Village: Ouantity Item 35 each Nylon spanner belts 3 each 1-1/211 diameter foam play pipes 7 each 1-1/211 diameter nozzles 1 each 111 diameter nozzle 2 each 2-1/211 diameter play pipes 3 each 1-1/211 Basement distributors 3 each 500 GPM fog nozzles 15 each Spring hold downs 1 each 500 watt light 2 each 120 GPM Inductors 1 each 95 GPM Inductor 8 each 360 Emergency Lights 1 each Fogger with 3 gallons of concentrate Miscellaneous electric equipment items SECTION TWO: That the Village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sell the aforementioned personal property owned by the Village of Mount Prospect to the highest bidder. SECTION THREE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk day of , 1989. Gerald L. Farley Village President Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public'Works DATE: August 9, 1989 TICKLER FILE SUBJECT: Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation (Prospect Meadows & Various Village Locations) Attached is a letter from our consulting engineer, Donohue and Associates,- Inc., on review of bids received for sanitary sewer rehabilitation. This project was bid several months ago and only one bid was received which was rejected as there was no comparison available. On July 24, 1989, bids were opened again for a modified version of the original submittal and, this time, there were two bid- ders. Vincent DiVito Inc.'s bid for all three contracts was $670,544, and Joel Kennedy Construction Co.'s was $526,555. As there is grant money involved in the payment for some of this work, the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency will have to give their approval on the award also. Subject to their concur- rence, the consulting engineer recommends, and I concur, to accept the lowest overall bid of $526,555 as submitted by Joel Kennedy Construction Co. Her ert L. Weeks HLW/td attach. bc: Carot*11 "'07771 .. . August 9, 1989 Village of Mount Prospect 1700 W. Central Road Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Attn: Mr. Herbert L. Weeks Director of Public Works ENGINEERS Re: Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation ARCHITECTS Donohue Project No. 16500 SCIENTISTS Dear Mr. Weeks: On July 24, 1989, bids were opened for Contracts A,B and C of the Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation project. After reviewing the bids, we offer the following recommendation. Contract A, the Prospect Meadows Manhole Rehabilitation received two bids namely Vincent DiVito, Inc. at $17,000 and Joel Kennedy Construction at $13,000. The Village's Manhole and spot replace- ment work, Contract B received bids from the same two contractors (Vincent DiVito, Inc. at $156,050 and Joel Kennedy Construction at $155,450). The Bobolink Sewer Replacement Contract C had bids from Vincent DiVito, Inc. at $517, 999 and from Joel Kennedy Construction at $398,105. The deduction for bidding and being awarded all three contracts was $20,000 from Vincent DiVito, Inc. and $40,000 from Joel Kennedy Construction (Bid Tabulation enclosed). We have knowledge of Joel Kennedy Construction's work and find it acceptable. We therefore recommend that the Village tentatively award Contracts A,B and C for a total of $526,555 to Joel Kennedy Construction. The award should be tentative pending IEPA concurrence. Should you have any questions, please call. Sincerely, DONOHUE & ASSOCIATE , I C. L e�(_ /� IZ Michael J. Drey, P.E. Senior Construction Engineer MJD:ppe encl: As Noted TR/L/YO8 ■ 1501 Woodfield Road Suite 200 East Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 312.605.8800 Telefax 312.605.8914 SCHAUMOUHG. 1l - D_V,Tp VEJJr.)EDY V TABULATION OF BIDS F c,uslr_ rx» _ Zy lir �•. `t-, i ' J CIEI C.Fj..t lam( ,n �'.. '. 7 , .::? • ' y, itEu� D,rJ"cj Muuupaiici ar Had Puaing �T__ ��T 'Fimi�- ` -as� gprae+a<c t Ecxvded i� Pmpaul G.,.r.ats..... ........ ..... ..... .. ... . . Tsmu.............. .. ........ ...... ......... - - - > i Taw i --. i ier.l III A I T.4 I iaW IIa8 h� Taal Items ( 7Ye-'s Uwa I Cwoeq 3 U; Tool ( SOA7.DD RE©iJJ_EMFE�7T I —4 Ii I j I Taw - rad f i Fico. --o Hid m_ � 111 a scHAUMURG. 1u f4E)\) 1 -)Ely TABULATION OF BIDS ,s..,V -,- r _f ViTo !CEr!r1�n v>Ue [ Qua y ,� r- raw ca: p— ' rw.l aux ra. raw u- It I Y W ma PAM F s w Ma - - r w d !Li 14T1�e�i �_ F� r q s+j ((t � . 1 [[ t t 00900 1.�. E1t1 � lm0 4 P1rC 2s �*r R nth 33 €€ tr, I Z iso A [ tea. i ID f 2 35 r er��t1�CE ( LF Za5 jd.�yn.m ( rP.b635�. (I I 3I3�aa� i NA,d4� L!i ] i i2De 3" R LF 5 3za.co 3sAoo 3 I raw Bid—_ """d 5�a,.?4t}.OU ISS,u59.d0 - SLR 5IM Rev i gal SCHAUMUna, tLL D V,T4 �1,FjJ�JEDY TABULATION OF BIDS lk TABULATION OF BIDS \ _ I ' i til CEM: T �J VITO M. o.. - - �% �% ITO iDMYdC.Y KEI.lF.iE.n`j KENNEDY Coe 7XAU- F'rE 4- a. sd — V --r ¢a aP se g_ s«„aa �_ �r lJVtint i i' .#, tt�S C Au. Cry mrat i ltem� AL.sy IIsi: i Ha 3 # ToW - IIaie Hw TaW Veit PA- TeW U a As SaW Trio # TeW Hmt TaW 3 gG Mafi LT .t � } j # tt I � i m t lvussrYe— TaW 4.�d HW +,q 1 - l t- ^` �0���`t .7 joi0, �/ r� `Y©. -4 for5i✓C.—. 8tR 5!CO �t;ev a-yxl Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: August 9, 1989 SUBJECT: Parkway Tree Planting Bid Sealed bids for parkway tree planting were opened on August 8, 1989. Bids were requested on our standard 2-1/211 tree used in the cost -share program and larger trees for auto accident re- placements. Bid prices are firm for both the fall 1989 and spring 1990 planting seasons. Bid tabulations are shown on Attachment A. In order to compare the various bids, we have estimated the quantities we will order. (See Attachment B.) It must be noted that, at this point, we can only estimate quantities since resi- dents may select from the species offered. There will be a future bid opening for purchase of 1-1/211 trees for reforestation. We were unable to estimate exact quantities until these prices were available. I There is a total of $99,200 allocated on page 158 of the 1989-90 budget in the followifig accounts: $50,000 in Account 1-071-08- 6241 and $49,200 in Account 1-071-08-6242. 1 recommend accep- tance of the bid submitted by Berthold Nursery in an amount not to exceed $99,200. Herbert L. Weeks HLW/td attach. ATTACHMENT A SHADE TREE PLANTING BID OPENING RESULTS August 8, 1989 Bid Cost Per Tree Est, Qty. Species Dia. Berthold Countryside Klehm St.Aubin 10 Black Maple 2-1/211 $222.00 $317.00 $275-00 no bid 20 Crimson King 215.00 314.00 275-00 247.00E Maple 30 Emerald Queen 205.00 302.00 249-00 289.00 or 'Emerald Lustre' Norway Maple 20 Columnar Norway 245.00 302.00 249.00 226.00F Maple 5 Globe Norway 230.00A 314.00 no bid no bid Maple 20 Sugar Maple 242.00 454.00 295.00 293.00 10 Hackberry 232.00 344.00 239.00 267.00 5 Katsura Tree 245.00 454.00 269.00 no bid 5 Turkish Filbert 272.00 454.00 269.00 no bid 30 Autumn Purple, 231.00 399.00 259.00 303.00 Kleinburg or Skyline White Ash 30 'Marshall Seed- 190.00 325.00 199.00 228.00 less' or 'Sum- mitlor Patmore Green Ash 5 Pumpkin Ash 190.00B 372.00 no bid no bid 10 'Autumn Gold' 368.00 537.00 325.00 312.00 Ginkgo 10 Princeton 368.00 358.00 325.00 no bid Sentry Ginkgo 30 Skyline or 215.00 248.00 275.00 249.00 Shademaster. Honeylocust 10 'Sentinel' 177.00 248.00 no bid 172.00 Crabapple tree form 10 'White Angell 2-1/21, 177.00 237.00 no bid 197.00 Crabapple tree form 5 Ironwood 2-1/211 320.00 578.00 275.00 382.00 (American Hop -hornbeam) 5 'Macho' Amur it 230.00C 333.00 275.00 274.00 Corktree 5 Bradford or 250.00 372.00 275.00 355.00 Autumn Blaze Pear 5 Sawtooth Oak 240.00D 427.00 no bid no bid 5 Northern Red 263.00 427.00 no bid 335.00 Oak LARGER TREES Est. Qty. Species Dia. Berthold Countryside Klehm St.Aubin 1 Sugar Maple 311 319.00 592.00 375.00 no bid I It it 4" 467.00 575.00 no bid no bid 1 if it 5" 667.00 695.00 no bid no bid 1 'Greenspirel 311 298.00 440.00 375.00 356.00 Littleleaf Linden 1 'Greenspirel 411 488.00 575.00 no bid 544.00 Littleleaf Linden 1 'Greenspirel 511 618.00 695.00 no bid 734.00 Littleleaf Linden 1 Marshall's 3" 280.00 383.00 325.00 301.00 Seedless Green Ash 1 Marshall's 411 410.00 575.00 475.00 476.00 Seedless Green Ash 1 Marshall's 511 590.00 695.00 600;00 563.00 Seedless Green Ash 1 Skyline 311 314.00 583.00 400.00 345.00 Honeylocust 1 Skyline 411 490.00 575.00 600.00 544.00 Honeylocust 1 Skyline 511 no bid 695.00 no bid 733.00 Honeylocust 1 Norway Maple 3" 331.00 523.00 400.00 363.00 1 Norway Maple 411 479.00 575.00 600.00 474.00 1 Norway Maple 511 654.00 695.00 no bid 596.00 2 Red Maple 311 338.00 597.00 400.00 380.00 1 Bradford Pear 311 348.00 537.00 400.00 355.00 1 Bradford Pear 411 474.00 575.00 600.00 no bid Substitutions A - Lace D - English Oak B - Emerald E - 211 tree C - Common Amur Corktree F - 211 tree ATTACHMENT B 2-1/2" TREES Est, Pumpkin Mh 950 Bid Cost 1,860 Qty. Species Berthold Klehm St.Aubin Countryside 10 Black Maple $ 2,220 $ 2,750 no bid $ 3,170 30 Crimson King Maple 6,450 8,250 $ 7,410 9,420 50 Emerald Queen or 10,250 12,450 14,450 15,100 Emerald Lustre 10 Norway Maple 1,770 no bid 1,720 2,480 20 Columnar Norway 4,900 4,980 4,520 6,040 Maple 5 Globe Norway Maple 1,150 no bid no bid 1,570 50 Sugar Maple 12,100 14,750 14,650 22,700 40 Hackberry 9,280 9,560 10,680 13,760 5 Katsura Tree 1,225 1,345 no bid 2,270 5 Turkish Filbert 1,360 1,345 no bid 2,270 50 Autumn Purple, 11,550 12,950 15,150 19,950 Kleinburg or Skyline White Ash 50 Marshall Seedless, 9,500 9,950 11,400 16,250 Summit or Patmore Green Ash 5 Pumpkin Mh 950 no bid no bid 1,860 10 Autumn Gold Ginkgo 3,680 3,250 3,120 5,370 10 Princeton Sentry 3,680 3,250 no bid 3,580 Ginkgo 50 Skyline or Shade- 10,750 13,750 12,450 12,400 master Honeylocust 10 Sentinel Crabapple 1,770 no bid 1,720 2,480 10 White Angel 1,770 no bid 1,970 2,370 Crabapple 5 Ironwood 1,600 1,375 1,910 2,890 5 Macho Amur Corktree 1,150 1,375 1,370 1,665 5 Bradford or Autumn 1,250 1,375 1,775 1,860 Blaze Pear 5 Sawtooth Oak 1,200 no bid no bid 2,135 5 Northern Red Oak 1,315 no bid 1,675 2,135 435 $99,100 $102,705* $104,250* $151,245 * Incomplete total due to "no bid" items Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager 'ab. FROM: Director Public Works DATE: August 8, 1989 SUBJECT: Bid for Services to to Install, Replace, or Test Water Meters Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 AM on August 8, 1989 for servic- es to install, replace, and test water meters. This is a two- year contract with a May 1, 1991 expiration date. There were two invitational bids sent out plus advertising in the local paper as required. We only received one bid from the HBK Water Meter Service Co. and their bid is as follows: Installation/Replacement Contract 5/8"xl/211 or 5/81fx3/411 water meter $34.38/meter 3/411 water meter 34.38 11 1" water meter 34.38 IT Add/deduct for automated read connection to 111 meter cost -0- 1-1/211 water meter 34.38 00 Testing Contract Two -Men Not to Labor Rate Exceed Time 201 water meter test $88.94/hr. 2 hrs. 311 it if it 88.94 11 2 411 IT it 11 88.94 11 2 11 611 of if to 88.94 11 3 2?1 if if repair 88.94 11 4 311 10 II 11 88.94 11 4 401 It it 88.94 11 4 6" IT if of 88.94 11 4 * plus repair part costs FM Bypass Meter Replacements 5/8" water meter $20.25/meter 111, IT 11 20.25 11 1-1/2 11 It 40.43 It On page 183 of the current budget, there is $20,000.00 under account code 41-072-07-6216 for meter installation work and $10,000.00 under account code 41-072-07-6218 for meter testing and repair. There is an additional $12,000 allocated for meter repair parts under account code 41-072-07-7213 for repair of defective meters. These repair parts are usually needed on the larger meters and are purchased and installed by the meter ser- vice contractor. Our cost for testing and repair of two-inch and over meters is backcharged to the water customer. I recommend that HBK Water Meter Service be awarded a contract for two years in the manner described in the bid documents in an amount not to exceed $42,000 for the current fiscal year. HLW/td Village of iviount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Engineering Coordinator DATE: August 9, 1989 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION for Forest Avenue Water main Replacement (Memory Lane to Kensington Road) On August 9, 1989, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the Forest Avenue Water Main Replacement. At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud. BID FORM The Bidder was requested to submit unit prices for a total of 24 individual bid items. BIDS RECEIVED Nine Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of two Contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of $254,209.00 by Vian Construction to a high of $279, 217.50 by John Rendina Construction Co. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was $211,200.00 (subsequent to the estimate being done, the Village specifications for water main were upgraded from Class 52 to Class 56 & minimum 811 diameter pipe). Note: approximately four Contractors did not bid due to the Performance Letter of Credit requirement. ANALYSIS OF BIDS All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 10% of their total bid as required by the contract Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. The lowest bid was 20 above the estimate. BIDDER'S TOTAL BI Vian Construction Co. $254,209.00 Elk Grove Village John Rendina Construction Co. $279,217.50 Lockport, Il Page 2 QUALIFICATIONS OF LOW BIDDER The low Bidder is Vian Construction Co., Inc. Vian Construction has not performed any recent Village projects. They are a frequent bidder and are qualified to perform this type of project. RECQMENDATION The Engineering Division recommends awarding this Contract to Vian Construction Co., Inc. for $254,209.00. Funding for this project is on Page 188 of the Budget under: Account No. 41-072-10-8728 $155,000.00 Account No. 41-072-10-8724 $ 99,209.00 Robert Pszanka, Engineering Coordinator I concur with the above recommendation Charles Bencic, Director of Inspection Services I concur with the above recommendation A,k(�C)�42� tcdAk�y Herbert L. Weeks, Director of Public Works RP/m Village of Mount Prospect Forest Avenue Watermain Replacement Memory Lane To Kensington Road Augest 16, 1989 10:00 A.M. Vian Construction tR= Engineer's Estimate o Item Quantity Unit Unit Total Unit Total Unit Total 1. 12" D.I.W.M. Class 56 30 LF 71.00 2,130.00 45.50 1,365.00 40.00 1,200.04 2. 10" D.I.W.M. Class 56 2000 LF 39.00 78,000.00 43.50 87,000.00 30,00 60,000,0( 3. 8" D.I.W.M. Class 56 80 LF 35.00 2,800.00 45.50 3,640.00 25.00 2,000.0( 4. 10" Butterfly Valve w/60" I.D. Vault 4 Ea 1,780.00 7,120.00 2,750.00 11,000.00 2,500.00 10,000.0( S. Hydrant With Aux. Valve & Box 6 Ea 1,400.00 8,400.00 1,650.00 9,900.00 1,500.00 9,000.0( 6. 1" Copper Water Service Connection 33 Ea 650.00 21,450.00 425.00 14,025.00 400.00 7. Curb Stop & Box 16 Ea 399.00 6,384.00 100.00 1,600.00 200.00 a,[00.0( 8. 1" Chlorination Tap 8 Ea 150.00 1,200.00 250.00 2,000.00 50.00 400.0( 9. Pavement Removal 2200 SY 8.00 17,600.00 3.50 7,700.00 5.00 11,000.0( 10 Granular Trench Backfill 5000 Ton 10.00 50,000.00 11.50 57,500.00 10.00 50,000.0( 11 Concrete Curb & Gutter Reml. & Repl. 200 LF 17.00 3,400.00 17.50 3,500.00 20.00 4,000.0( 12 Bit. Leveling Binder - 2.5" 450 Ton 50.00 22,500.00 65.00 29,250.00 40.00 18,000.0( 13 Bit. Material Prime Coat 600 Gal 2.00 1,200.00 3.00 1,800.00 2.00 1,200.0( 14 Bit. Conc. Surface Course Class I - i" 200 Ton 50.00 10,000.00 80.00 16,000.00 50.00 10,000.0( 15 Asphalt Drive - Remove & Replace 50 SY 20.00 1,000.00 35.00 1,750.00 40.00 2,000.0( 16 Concrete Drive - Remove & Replace 50 SY 50.00 2,500.00 49.50 2,475.00 50.00 2,500.0( 17 Concrete Walk - Remove & Replace 800 SF 4.00 3,200.00 3.75 3,000.00 5.00 4,000.0( 18 Storm Sewer Repair 50 LF 30.00 1,500.00 75.00 3,750.00 20.00 1,000.0( 19 Watermain Removal 50 LF 12.00 600.00 15.00 750.00 10.00 500.0( 20 Valve Vault Removal 5 Ea 400.00 2,000.00 450.00 2,250.00 200.00 t '".0( 21 Hydrant W/ Aux. Valve & Box Removal 4 Ea 150.00 600.00 450.00 1,800.00 250.00 ! )0.0( 22 Abandon Watermain 14 Ea 400.00 5,600.00 750.00 10,500.00 50.00 700.0( 23 Sod Restoration 550 SY 5.50 3,025.00 5.75 3,162.50 6.00 3,300.0( 24 Traffic And Dust Control 1 L Sum 2,000.00 2,000.00 3,500.00 3,500.00 1 2,000.00 2,000.0( Total 254,209.00 Total 279,217.50 Total 211,200.0( Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM A4-16 TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: August 7, 1989 SUBJECT: Lincoln Bridge Rehabilitation Earlier this spring, Donohue Engineering Company was given a contract to prepare a study on the rehabilitation of the bridge on Lincoln Street over Weller Creek. on June 30, 1989, they submitted their report and offered three options for repair and rehabilitation. The estimates for this rehab work ranged from $47,000 to $110,000. After review, the village engineer and I recommend Option I, at an estimated cost of $47,000. This op- tion would bring the bridge up to 20 years of additional use. So the project can be started this year, the Village engineer and I recommend contracting with Donohue Engineering Company for the design, bidding, and inspection work on this project. They have submitted a proposal for this work as follows: Phase 1 $13,150 (Includes preparing specifications and design for project) Phase II $ 1,950 (includes bidding of project) Phase 111 $16,700 (Includes construction observation. This is a not -to -exceed number. Our intent is to use village inspectors as much as possible, so the Phase III cost will be reduced to the actual number of hours the Donohue inspector is on the job. To speed up the rehabilitation work on this bridge, the engineer is recommending, and I concur, to close it off to all traffic to allow the contractor total access to the bridge deck without having to provide access for motorists. This bridge was originally built in 1947 and the last time work was done was approximately 20 years ago. On page 152, account code 22-071-04-6150, there is $55,000 allo- cated for this work. I recommend that Donohue Engineering Company be -awarded the contract for the design, bidding, and inspection of the Lincoln Street Bridge for an amount not to exceed $31,800. Rehabilita- tion work will be according to Option I of their recent study. Herbert L. weeks HLW/td attach. c: Village Engineer Bencic Village co Mawrit grzMpect Mow Illinois : To: Director of Public Works From: Director of Inspection Services Date: July 12, 1989 Subject: Lincoln St. Bridge The Engineering Division has reviewed the Lincoln St. Bridge report done by Donohue & Assoc. We recommend that the bridge be repaire'd per Option No. I outlined in the report. - The present work load in the Engineering Division will not allow us to do the design work for this bridge until late this year. Therefore, we recommend negotiating a contract with Donohue for design of the bridge repair. By having Donohue do the design for Lincoln St. Bridge we could complete the design for the Emerson St. Bridge this winter and have it ready for an early spring letting. Chuck CB/M August 4, 19V Village of Mount Prospect 100 South Emerson Mount Prospect, IL 60056 ENGINEERS Attn: Mr. Herb Weeks, P.E. Director of Public Works ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS Re: Agreement for Engineering Services Lincoln Street Bridge Structure 016-4003 Village of Mount Prospect Cook County, Illinois Gentlemen: In response to your request, we are pleased to submit for your consideration this agreement for the rehabilitation of the Lincoln Street structure (016-4003) in the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois. For the purpose of this agreement, the Village of Mount Prospect will be referred to as the Owner and Donohue & Associates, Inc., will be referred to as Donohue. The services indicated shall be provided in accordance with our General Terms and Conditions, dated November 1, 1987, a copy of which is attached for reference. Donohue understands the Owner will fund the proposed design and rehabilitation construction with local funds, without Federal or State aid. Therefore, the project development, plan preparation, specifications, and bidding documents will be prepared based upon local funding. This agreement includes the following engineering services to be performed by Donohue: Phase I I . ....... Design Studigg and Design 1. Collect and review as -built construction plans and records, repair/maintenance records, past inspection records, and other available information pertaining to the structure. 2. Field review the structure with the Owner to confirm the extent of rehabilitation desired. This field review will also determine if there are any other significant changes in the condition of the structure since the last inspection. N 1501 Woodfield Road Suite 200 East Schaumburg, Illinois 60173 312,605.8800 Telefax 312.605.8914 3. Prepare for Owner's approval bid documents and contract plans, specifications, and special provisions incorporating rehabilitation of the bridge based upon the previous inspections including: A. Rehabilitation of the concrete deck consisting of bituminous wearing surface removal, partial and full depth deck slab repair, deck scarification, bridge deck concrete overlay, protective coat, and adjusting deck ENGINEERS drains. ARCHITECTS SCIENTISTS B. Cleaning and painting of the steel railing. C. Epoxy crack sealing and epoxy mortar repair of the abutment bodies, wingwalls, and railing pedestals, as necessary. D. Placement of erosion control below the storm sewer outlet at the East Abutment footing. 4. Contact public and private utilities that may be affected by the proposed structure rehabilitation. Phase 11 - Bidding 5. Provide the Owner with a list of responsible and interested bidders and supply 15 sets of specifications and plans for distribution by the Owner. 6. Attend the bid opening, prepare a bid analysis, and a letter of recommendation for award. 7. Assist the Owner in finalizing contract documents and necessary paperwork for a completed construction contract. EhAse Qqnstruction Qhservati2n Service �s 8. - Provide an experienced full-time engineer or engineering technician to observe progress, quality of work, and to advise the Owner as to conformance with the plans and specifications. This ig--ecme-._t shall assume a 25 -working day contract for construction operations. If construction operations exceed 25 working days, the fee for Phase III services shall be renegotiated. 9. Prior to commencement of construction, hold a preconstruction conference with the contractor, Owner, and the utility companies, in the Owner's offices to review the plans and proposed work schedule. Village of mount Prospect August 4, 1989 Page 2 10. Provide necessary line and grade. 11. Review contractor's partial and final payment request including liens and waivers and make recommendations to the Owner regarding payment requests -including claims for supplemental work over and above the original contract agreement. 12. Assist the contractor and the Owner in coordinating traffic ENGINEERS restrictions, street closings, and other operational ARCHITECTS concerns, including coordination with utilities. SCIENTISTS 13. Report substandard work, work in conflict with contract documents, or other items in conflict with standard and safe engineering or construction practices. 14. Review shop drawings and other contractor's supplied information as required to ensure conformance with contract documents, prepare change orders and submit to the owner and contractor for agreement as required, 15. Provide a weekly written report to the Owner concerning work completed, quality of the work, contacts with Village's residents, and other data as required. A daily log of activities, progress, and quality of work shall be kept by the assigned engineer/technician and copies of log be provided to the Owner upon request. 16. Prepare a final punchlist and written report of final inspection for the Owner prior to release of finalpaymentto the contractor. 17. Provide one set of reproducible drawings of record that are modified to reflect the as -construction elevations and conditions. Donohue understands the Owner intends to award construction bids for this project during the 1989 construction season. Furthermore, the bid documents, including construction plans and specifications, must be completed prior to September 15, 1989. Compensation to Donohue for the services indicated shall be on a per them basis in accordance with our standard hourly fees in effect at the time the services are performed. Donohue will bill the Owner for the actual services provided by staff members involved plus other incidental expenses including mileage, repro- duction, and other direct expenses. The estimated per them fee for the services indicated for each phase is as follows: Village of Mount Prospect August 4, 1989 Page 3 Phase I (Items 1 thru 4) $13,150.00 Phase II (Items 5 thru. 7) $ 1,950.00 Phase III (Items 8 thru 17) $16,700.00 If the performance of engineering services as outlined in this agreement is delayed by factors beyond the control of Donohue, or if the scope of services as indicated is changed by the Owner, ENGINEERS this proposal shall be renegotiated to compensate Donohue for the ARCHITECTS actual expenses. SCIENTISTS We appreciate the opportunity to submit this agreement for engi- neering services. The receipt of a signed copy of this agreement shall be considered as written authorization to proceed with the engineering services described. If you have any questions regarding any part of this agreement, please feel free to contact Mr. James R. Lucht, Chief Bridge Engineer at this office. Very truly yours, Accepted by: DONOHUE & OCIATES, INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, IL ld C. Zi r, P.E. Vice Presid Date DCZ:laf enc: General Terms & Conditions dated November 1, 1987 M/P/BY5 Village of Mount Prospect August 4, 1989 Page 4 Donohue, GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS Effective November 1, 1987 1. Donohue will bill the Owner monthly with net payment due in ten (10) days. Bills will detail hours and other fees charged by standard job classification . Client requests for copies of original source documents will be billed as additional services at the rates in effect at the time of the request. Any sales or use taxes imposed upon provision of professional services under this agreement and in effect on the date of the bill will be added to the invoice amount and billed to the Owner. Past due balances shall be subject to a service charge at a rate of 1.0% per month. In addition, Donohue may, after giving seven (7) days written notice, suspend service under any agreement until the Owner has paid in full all amounts due to services rendered and expenses incurred, including a service charge on past due invoices. 2. The stated fees and scope of services constitute our best estimate of the fees and tasks required to perform the services as defined. This agreement, upon execution by both parties hereto, can be amended only by written instrument signed by both parties. For those projects involving conceptual or process development services, activities often cannot be fully defined during initial planning. As the project progresses, £acts uncovered may reveal a change in direction which may alter the scope. Donohue will promptly inform the Owner in writing of such situations so that changes in this agreement can be renegotiated as required. 3. Costs and schedule commitments shall be subject to renegotiation for delays caused by the Owner's failure to provide specified facilities or information or for delays caused by unpredictable occurrences including, without limitation. fires, floods, riots, strikes, unavailability of labor or materials, delays or defaults by suppliers of materials or ser- vices, process shutdowns, acts of God or the public enemy, or acts or regulations of any governmental agency. Temporary delays of services caused by any of the above which results in additional costs beyond those outlined may require renego- tiation of this agreement. 4. Donohue will maintain insurance coverage for: Worker's Compensation, General Liability, Automobile Liability, Aviation, and Professional Liability. Donohue will provide specific limits upon request. If the Owner requires coverages or limits In addition to those in effect as of the date of the agreement, premiums for additional Insurance shall be paid by the Owner. 5. Donohue and the Owner agree that the overall liability for the actual, alleged, or threatened discharge, dispersal, release, or escapement of pollutants, and the responsibility for the ownership and maintenance of any toxic, hazardous, or asbestos materials relating to the project, remain with the Owner. Donohue and the Owner acknowledge that Donohue's pro- fessional liability policy does not apply to claims arising out of the actual, alleged, or threatened discharge, disper- sal, release, or escapement of -pollutants. Therefore, the Owner agrees not to bring a claim against Donohue relating to the uninsured liability referenced above. Furthermore, the Owner agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Donohue for claims against Donohue by a third party for the uninsured liability referenced above. Donohue agrees to perform the services to the normal accepted standard -of care, and to assume the liability resulting from a finding of gross negligence. 6. When Donohue, subsequent to execution of an agreement, finds that specialized equipment must be purchased to provide special services outside t�- ^co -e ^£ services, the cost of such equipment and/or special services will not be added to the agreed fees until the Caner has been notified and agrees. 7. The Owner agrees to provide such legal, accounting, and insurance counseling services as may be required for the project. 8. Termination of this agreement by the Owner or Donohue shall be effective upon seven (7) days' written notice to the other party. The written notice shall Include the reasons and details for termination. Donohue will prepare a final invoice showing all charges incurred through the date of termination: payment Is due as stated in paragraph 1. If the Owner violates any of the agreements entered into between Donohue and the Owner or if the Owner fails to carry out any of the duties contained in these terms and conditions, Donohue may, upon seven (7) days' written notice, suspend services without further obligation or Liability to the Owner unless, within such seven (7) day period, the Owner remedies such violation to the reasonable satisfaction of Donohue. 9. Reuse of any documents pertaining to this project by the Owner on extensions of this project or on any other project shall be at the Owner's risk. The Owner agrees to defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Donohue from all claims, damages, and expenses including attorney's fees arising out of such reuse of the documents by the Omer or by others acting through the Owner. 10. Donohue will provide all services in accordance with generally accepted professional practices. Donohue will not provide or offer to provide services inconsistent with or contrary to such practices nor make any warranty or guarantee, expressed or Implied, nor to have any agreement or contract for services subject to the provision of any uniform commercial code. Similarly, Donahue will not accept those terms and conditions offered by the Owner in its purchase order, requisition, or notice of authorization to proceed, except as set forth herein or expressly accepted in writing. Written acknowledgement of receipt, or the actual performance of services subsequent to receipt of such purchase order, requisition, or notice of authorization to proceed is specifically deemed not to constitute acceptance of any terms or conditions contrary to those set forth herein. 11. Donohue Intends to serve as the Owner's professional representative for those services as defined in this agreement and to provide advice and consultation to the Owner as a professional. Any opinions of probable project costs, approvals, and other decisions made by Donohue for the Owner are rendered on the basis of experience and qualifications and represent our professional judgment. 12. This agreement shall not be construed as giving Donohue the responsibility or authority to direct or supervise construc- tion means, methods, techniques, sequence, or procedures of construction selected by contractors or subcontractors or the safety precautions and programs incident to the work of the contractors or subcontractors. 13. Donohue is an affirmative action employer and operates under Executive Order 11246. 1.4 INTRODUCTION As requested by the Village of Mount Prospect, the following documentation constitutes a Structure Condition Report for Structure Number 016-4003 carrying Lincoln Street over Weller Creek in the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois. The information contained in this report is based upon a visual inspection of the structure, performance of non-destructive and destructive testing procedures, evaluation of construction plans, past inspection, inventory, and maintenance records and reports, and structural computations to compute and verify the inventory and operational capacities. The purpose of this Structure Condition Report is to document the 14 overall condition of the structure, identify deficiences, calculate the live load carrying capacity, and recommend potential rehabilitation and/or replacement alternatives. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Village of Mount Prospect proceed with A rehabilitation of the Lincoln Street bridge consisting of, as a minimum, the removal of the bituminous overlay and reconstruction of the concrete deck with partial and full depth repair, deck eck scarification, and overlay with a latex modified or plasticized dense concrete. Other minor repairs and improvements are also recommended to the steel railing and abutments. It is also recommended the Village consider total removal and replacement of the superstructure as an alternative method to improve the condition of the structure. E U L Structure Condition Report Lificoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 1 of 9 STRUCTURE CONDITION REPORT LINCOLN STREET BRIDGE STRUCTURE NUMBER 016-4003 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS DONOHUE PROJECT NO. 17069 1.4 INTRODUCTION As requested by the Village of Mount Prospect, the following documentation constitutes a Structure Condition Report for Structure Number 016-4003 carrying Lincoln Street over Weller Creek in the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois. The information contained in this report is based upon a visual inspection of the structure, performance of non-destructive and destructive testing procedures, evaluation of construction plans, past inspection, inventory, and maintenance records and reports, and structural computations to compute and verify the inventory and operational capacities. The purpose of this Structure Condition Report is to document the 14 overall condition of the structure, identify deficiences, calculate the live load carrying capacity, and recommend potential rehabilitation and/or replacement alternatives. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that the Village of Mount Prospect proceed with A rehabilitation of the Lincoln Street bridge consisting of, as a minimum, the removal of the bituminous overlay and reconstruction of the concrete deck with partial and full depth repair, deck eck scarification, and overlay with a latex modified or plasticized dense concrete. Other minor repairs and improvements are also recommended to the steel railing and abutments. It is also recommended the Village consider total removal and replacement of the superstructure as an alternative method to improve the condition of the structure. E U L Structure Condition Report Lificoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 1 of 9 C ADESCRIPTION OF STRUCTURE The Lincoln Street bridge (Structure No. 016-4003) is a single span reinforced concrete T -beam bridge supported by vertical face full retaining reinforced concrete abutments on spread footings. According to records supplied by the Village of Mount Prospect and the Cook County Highway Department, the structure was built in 1947. The clear span length of the structure is 35.28 -feet with an overall length of 38.5 -feet. The overall structure width is 55.46 -feet consisting of a 44.0 -foot clear roadway width and two 4.48 -foot clear width sidewalks. The structure is skewed 21 degrees right hand forward. A longitudinal construction joint extends the full length of the structure along the centerline of the roadway. The structure provides for two lanes of vehicular traffic with on -street parking along both sides of Lincoln Street. Pedestrian sidewalks are provided on both sides of the structure; however, only the northeast quadrant has concrete approach sidewalks. The other quadrants have grass and gravel walkways in various stages of use. A bituminous concrete wearing surface underlaid by a geotextile fabric has been placed on the bridge deck. The exact date of placement of the wearing surface is unknown but estimated to be in If the early to mid 1970's. A combination traffic/pedestrian barrier consists of a fabricated steel pipe railing with vertical bar lattice work. The rail post spacing is approximately 6.94 -feet. Reinforced concrete pedestals r_1 are provided at each corner of the abutment body and at the end of each wingwall. IfBoth abutments are reinforced concrete vertical face7 full retaining cantilever walls supported on spread footings. The construction plans do not indicate the type or bearing capacity of the substructure support material. The wingwalls of both abutments extend parallel to the roadway centerline approximately 25 -feet from the front face of the abutment body. According to the construction plans, the structure was designed for H-20 liveload using an allowable concrete design stress of fc = 1200 psi and fc = 850 psi for the superstructure and substructure, respectively. The allowable design stress for the reinforcing steel was fs = 20r000 psi. The structure was designed under Service Load conditions. The H-20 liveload consists of a 40,000 pound gross vehicle weight with 8,000 pounds to the front axle and 32,000 pounds to the rear axle with an axle spacing of 14.0 -feet. t I Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 2 of 9 A storm sewer pipe outlets through the East Abutment body just north of the centerline of the roadway. No other utilities are attached to or carried by the structure. Both the west and east approach roadways consist of bituminous concrete pavement between concrete curb and gutter sections. BRIDGE CONDITION RESULTS A field review and visual inspection of the structure was made on Thursday, June 1, 1989. The weather conditions were overcast with intermittent rain showers and temperatures in the range of 70 to 75 degrees. See Exhibit A for a copy of the field notes from the visual inspection. The field inspection procedures involved a general visual inspection of the structure, non-destructive testing procedures consisting of "hammer sounding" and "chain -dragging" of the deck, and isolated destructive sampling of the bituminous wearing surface and reinforced concrete bridge deck. Photographs of typical members and deteriorated areas were also taken. See Exhibit B for a copy of the appropriate photographs. The 2 -inch bituminous wearing surface is in fair to poor condition with considerable transverse and longitudinal cracking, patching, settlement, and overall debonding with the concrete deck. Sounding of the wearing surface by a combination "hammer and chain -dragging" method indicated that approximately 20 to 25% of the deck surface is debonded and/or delaminated. A majority of the deteriorated surface occurs around longitudinal and transverse cracks as well as previously placed patches and crack filling. Because of the presence of the bituminous wearing surface,,the condition of the upper surface of the reinforced concrete deck is poor. Several samples of the bituminous wearing surface and reinforced concrete deck were taken by "peeling back" the surface to examine the material. This resultant testing indicated debonding of the bituminous wearing surface and overall deterioration of the upper 1/2 -inch to 1 -1/2 -inch depth of the concrete deck. The deteriorated concrete material consisted of a sand and gravel mixture. The underside of the concrete deck is in good to fair to poor condition dependent upon the location within the structure. The deficiencies include cracking, spalling, scaling, efflorescence, staining, and dampness. A majority of the deterioration in the underside of the deck appears to coincide with deficient conditions on the upper surface of the deck. It is anticipated that approximately 15 to 25% of the concrete surface will require full -depth replacement. I Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 3 of 9 Three deck drains are equally spaced along both the north and sou -.h curb lines of the structure. Each of the drains are functioning properly but have a, tendency to become "clogged" with debris. Because of approach pavement settlement, water ponds along the curb line and does not flow across the structure to the floor drains. The' ponding water may in fact be a cause for the settlqment of the approach pavement due to consolidation of the fill material behind the abutment backwalls. Both sidewalks are in generally good condition with only minor scaling and spalling aic.L; the curb line. There is minor transverse cracking but is not resulting in any concrete deterioration. Inadequate bar steel cover along the north curb line has resulted in staining and scaling with exposed reinforcement. The steel railing is in good condition with only minor surface rusting and pitting. An anchor bolt assembly has rusted and broken off immediately east of the northeast concrete pedestal at the East Abutment. The concrete pedestals are in good to excellent condition with only minor surface scaling and spalling. The existing railing does not meet current American. Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) specifications and criteria as an acceptable system for a vehicular and/or pedestrain railing. Both of the abutments appear to be in good condition with no signs of deflectionr rotation, or settlement. There are numerous vertical hairline cracks in both abutments extending variable heights of the abutment body. The storm sewer discharging through the East Abutment is causing stream bank erosion along the front face of the abutment body. During periods of low stream flow and high storm sewer run-off, the erosion could result in the potential for scour at the "toe" of the abutment footing. STRUCTURE CONDITIONAL RATINGS As determined from the Structure Data Inventory and Appraisal forms prepared by the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT), the conditional and appraisal ratings for the main structural elements are as follows: Deck (Item 58) - 6 Superstructure (Item 59) - 6 Substructure (Item 60) - 8 Channel & Channel Protection (Item 61) - 7 Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 4 of 9 Estimated Remaining Life (Item 63) - 20 Inventory Rating Type & Load (items 66A & 66B) & 20 Structural Condition (Item 67) - Safe Load Capacity (Item 70) - 7 STRUCTURE CAPACITY RATING Three separate capacity ratings are assigned to a structure during its life expectancy. These ratings include Design, Inventory, and Operational and indicate the capacity of the structure under various loading conditions and stress levels. The Design Rating is the liveload capacity of the structure for which it was designed. Inventory Rating is the liveload capacity under current loading conditions assuming an unlimited number of passages of the liveload. The operational Rating is the maximum liveload capacity under current loading conditions for a one-time liveload assuming no impact loading and higher stress levels. As previously indicated, the structure was designed for a H-20 liveload and therefore the Design Rating is H2O. This rating does not take into consideration any over -design of the main load carrying members of the structure. It should be noted that provisions were not taken into consideration during the original design for the placement of the existing bituminous wearing surface. Computations for the capacity of the superstructure based upon the uas-built" condition results in an actual Design Rating of H27 indicating an over designed liveload. Based upon the existing condition of the superstructure and assuming a loss of 1 -1/2 -inches of the top deck surface due to concrete deterioration results in an Inventory Rating of H23.�, The Operational Rating of the superstructure is in excess of H30 based upon the existing condition as stated above. Based upon the Inventory and Operational Ratings, the structure need not be posted for a restricted weight limit. STRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES Based upon the inspection and evaluation of the structure, the bridge has several deficiencies which are affecting the condition and load carrying capacity. These deficiencies include the wearing surface and superstructure concrete in the main load carrying members as well as other minor deficiencies to the abutments and railing system. Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 5 of 9 ri The bituminous wearing surface is cracked and porous which allows chloride laden water to penetrate to the interface between the overlay and the reinforced concrete deck. The cracks and resulting voids require patching and repair which reduces the ride qualities of the bridge deck wearing surface. However, more important is the damage caused 'by the chloride laden water to the concrete and reinforcing steel in the main load carrying members. The presence of the chlorides deteriorates the concrete and accelerates the rusting process of the reinforcing steel resulting in further loss of section properties within the top slab. As the deterioration continues the loss of properties and decrease in load carrying capacity accelerates. Results of samples taken through the wearing surface and into the concrete deck indicates that chloride penetration is occurring with significant deterioration of the concrete. The underside of the superstructure is showing signs of cracking, spalling, dampness, and general deterioration due to penetration of chloride laden water through the slab concrete. Minor vertical cracking is occurring in the front face of both abutments which results in leakage of water through the body and general deterioration of the surrounding concrete. The deck drains and downspouts have a tendency to trap debris which limits their ability to adequately drain the surface flow from the structure. In fact, the gutter flow across the structure is hindered by the settlement and lower roadway profile on either side of the abutments. The lack of adequate drainage across the structure is a contributing factor in the increased deterioration of the wearing surface and superstructure concrete. The existing railing system does not meet current AXSHTO requirements for a combined traffic/pedestrian barrier. In addition, the railing shows signs of minor rusting and pitting of the members with total loss of an anchor bolt at the northeast corner of the abutment body. Erosion along the front face of the East Abutment body below the storm sewer discharge pipe is a cOLt-ijut,ing factor to potential scour and undermining of the abutment footing. REHABILITATION RECOMMENDATIONS If the Lincoln Street structure is to maintain a level of service acceptable to the types of loads and traffic being applied, the following rehabilitation and/or repair options should be considered for the structure (provided the repairs are cost effective and within the guidelines established by the Village): Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 6 of 9 1. The bituminous wearing surface should be removed from the deck with partial and full depth slab repairs made to the concrete superstructure to correct deficiencies in the slab. An overlay of either latex modified concrete or plasticized dense concrete should be placed on the scarified deck surface in accordance with the requirements of IDOT Special Provision BSP -16. This type 6f repair will remove the deteriorated concrete and provide for a sound and durable wearing surface. No significant change in the Inventory or Operational Rating of the superstructure will result from this type of improvement. The overlay should increase the life expectency of the superstructure in the range of from 10 to 20 years after which deck replacement will have to be considered. An alternative to an overlay system is the complete removal and replacement of the superstructure at this time. Two options are available to acheive this alternative. The first option uses precast prestressed concrete deck beams with a membrane waterproofing and bituminous concrete wearing surface. The second option uses precast prestressed concrete I -beams with a conventional reinforced concrete deck. Both options provide a cost effective superstructure replacement to meet traffic needs for future years. Because of the superstructure replacement, both options will require the removal and replacement of the traffic/pedestrian railing with increased project cost. From a standpoint of future maintenance, the second option will provide a more durable deck with fewer concerns regarding development of cracks and delaminations. Epoxy coated reinforcement and protective coating of the exposed concrete surface will enhance the durability of the concrete to withstand chloride penetration. A precast prestressed I-beam superstructure should provide a 40 -year life expectancy at which time a concrete overlay may be necessary. Precast concrete box beams with membrane waterproofing and bituminous wearing surfaces have a tendency to develop longitudinal cracks between the individual box sections. These reflective cracks cause Jam_,gi to the membrane and wearing surface and allow chlorides to penetrate to the concrete box sections causing deterioration to the concrete. Maintenance of the bituminous wearing surface will be necessary during the life of the superstructure. Replacement or an additional overlay may be required within 15 to 20 years. Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 7 of 9 2. The cracks in both abutments should be cleaned and repaired using an epoxy crack sealing procedure as described in IDOT Special Provision BSP -14. The epoxy is a two -component epoxy -resin bonding system used for grouting non-moving damp cracks and voids in concrete. This type of repair will eliminate intrusion of water through the abutment body. 3. Spalled and surface deterioration of the curbs, abutment bodies, and abutment wingwalls should be repaired using an epoxy mortar repair. This type of repair will provide a structural bonding of the repair to the original sound concrete. 4. The steel traffic/pedestrian railing should be cleaned and painted using the provisions of Section 509 of the IDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. 5. Erosion control consisting of either stone riprap or poured concrete should be placed in front of the East Abutment below the storm sewer outlet to minimize the potential for scour and undermining of the abutment footing. REHABILITATION/REPAIR COST Three basic options are available for the rehabilitation/repair of the structure. Option No. I includes the removal of the bituminous wearing surface, partial and full depth deck repairs, deck scarificatic-, pl-cement of a latex modified or plasticized dense concrete overlay, adjustment of the deck drains, cleaning and painting of the steel railing, epoxy crack sealing, epoxy mortar repair, and erosion control below the storm sewer outlet. The probable construction cost for this option is approximately $47,000 including a 10% contingency factor. Option No. 2 includes removal of the existing superstructure, structural excavation, partial removal and replacement of the abutment body concrete, placement of precast prestressed concrete box beams with a membrane waterproofing and bituminous wearing surface, placement of new concrete sidewalks, parapets, and railing, epoxy crack sealing, epoxy mortar repair, and erosion control. The probable construction cost for this option is approximately $107,000 including a 10% contingency factor. Option No. 3 includes removal of the existing superstructure, structural excavation, partial removal and replacement of the abutment body concrete, placement of precast prestressed concrete 14 I -beams with a reinforced concrete deck slab, concrete sidewalks and parapets, aluminum railings, epoxy crack sealing, epoxy mortar r_U repair, and erosion control. The probable construction cost for k4 this option is approximately $110,000 including a 10% contingency factor. Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 8 of 9 N. Exhibits C, D, and E indicate a breakdown of the various construction items, descriptions, estimated quantities, and estimated unit prices in 1989 dollars. Additional approach roadway reconstruction will be necessary to provide minor wedges of bituminous pavement to correct profile gradel ' ine changes. Also, traffic control and maintenance of traffib during construction operations must be added to the abov4 estimates of construction cost. RECOMMENDATIONS As a minimum, it is recommended the Village of Mount Prospect proceed with the repair and rehabilitation of the Lincoln Street bridge consisting of the following general items: 1. Bridge deck concrete overlay (either latex modified concrete or plasticized dense concrete) including removal of the bituminous wearing surface, partial and full depth deck slab repair, deck scarification, protective coat, and adjusting deck drains. 2. Cleaning and painting of the steel railing. 3. Epoxy crack sealing and epoxy mortar repair of the abutment bodies, wingwalls, and railing pedestals, as necessary. 4. Placeme--1- of erosion control below the storm sewer outlet at the East Abutment footing. If the Village elects the above option, it is recommended that preparation of reconstruction plans, specifications, and bidding documents proceed for potential construction during late 1989. Considering the deck overlay, as specified above, has a limited life, it is also recommended the Village consider removal and replacement of the superstructure using Option No. 3. This option will provide additional years of service without the need for an overlay placement or future reductions in the load carrying capacity of the structure. Preparation of reconstruction plans, specifications, and bidding documents could proceed now with actual construction operations during late spring and early summer of 1990. IL Structure Condition Report Lincoln Street Bridge June 30, 1989 Page 9 of 9 On Thursday, June 1, 1989, a visual inspection of the subject structure was made. The purpose of this inspection was to gather initial site data and determine the preliminary condition of the structure for further office evaluation. The. weather conditions during the inspection were overcast with intermittent rain showers and a temperature in the range of 700 to 750. The structure is a single span reinforced concrete T -beam bridge with an overall length of 38,5 -feet back to back of abutments and a clear span of 35.3 -feet. The clear roadway width is 44.0 -feet and the structure has 4.5 foot clear width sidewalks on both the north and south side of the roadway. The pedestrian railing is a combination steel and concrete system with concrete pedestals at the end of the wing walls and abutment back wall. The rail post spacing is 7.0 -feet. A bituminous wearing surface has been placed on the structure. The wearing surface thickness is approximately 2 -inches and it would appear that a geo-textile fabric was placed over the concrete surface between the deck and; the bituminous material. The wearing surface has three major longitudinal cracks extending the full length of the structure. The center crack is along the longitudinal construction joint and extends full depth of the bituminous wearing surface and into the concrete deck. There are four locations in which there is a full depth hole in the deck and wearing surface. There are several areas of transverse and map cracking in the wearing surface. The eastbound lanes have had three areas in which additional bituminous patching has been completed. The west approach to the eastbound lane has also had a bituminous mat placed to correct some settlement west of the west abutment. The westbound lane has five previously placed bituminous patches in areas of failure. In sounding the deck with a hammer, it estimated that approximately 20 to 258 of the bituminous overlay has either debonded or the concrete below the overlay is delaminated. Sounding the deck with a heavy chain would substantiate the percentage of debonded wearing surface. In fact, the chain drag method located many debonded areas in what appeared to be a relatively good wearing surface. E, MEMORANDUM DATE: June 6, 1989 TO: Files SUBJECT: Village of Mount Prospect Visual Inspection Lincoln Street Bridge Structure No. 016-4003 Weller Creek Crossing Village of Mount Prospect Cook County, Illinois Donohue Project No. 17069.000 FROM: Jim Lucht On Thursday, June 1, 1989, a visual inspection of the subject structure was made. The purpose of this inspection was to gather initial site data and determine the preliminary condition of the structure for further office evaluation. The. weather conditions during the inspection were overcast with intermittent rain showers and a temperature in the range of 700 to 750. The structure is a single span reinforced concrete T -beam bridge with an overall length of 38,5 -feet back to back of abutments and a clear span of 35.3 -feet. The clear roadway width is 44.0 -feet and the structure has 4.5 foot clear width sidewalks on both the north and south side of the roadway. The pedestrian railing is a combination steel and concrete system with concrete pedestals at the end of the wing walls and abutment back wall. The rail post spacing is 7.0 -feet. A bituminous wearing surface has been placed on the structure. The wearing surface thickness is approximately 2 -inches and it would appear that a geo-textile fabric was placed over the concrete surface between the deck and; the bituminous material. The wearing surface has three major longitudinal cracks extending the full length of the structure. The center crack is along the longitudinal construction joint and extends full depth of the bituminous wearing surface and into the concrete deck. There are four locations in which there is a full depth hole in the deck and wearing surface. There are several areas of transverse and map cracking in the wearing surface. The eastbound lanes have had three areas in which additional bituminous patching has been completed. The west approach to the eastbound lane has also had a bituminous mat placed to correct some settlement west of the west abutment. The westbound lane has five previously placed bituminous patches in areas of failure. In sounding the deck with a hammer, it estimated that approximately 20 to 258 of the bituminous overlay has either debonded or the concrete below the overlay is delaminated. Sounding the deck with a heavy chain would substantiate the percentage of debonded wearing surface. In fact, the chain drag method located many debonded areas in what appeared to be a relatively good wearing surface. The majority Of the debonding occurred around the longitudinal and transverse cracks as well as the previously placed patches. In removing portions of the bituminous overlay and exposing the upper surface of the concrete deck verifies the debonded condition as well as delamination and deterioration of the concrete. The overlay thickness varies from 1 1/2 to 2 inches. The deterioration of the concrete surface extends from a minimum of i/2 -inch to approximately an inch and a half to an inch and three-quarters. When removing . the concrete material it is a combination of fine aggregate as well as the sand material. The structure has three drains along each of the curb lines. Five of the six drains are functioning properly. The center drain on the south side of the structure is clogged with debris. Because of the bituminous overlay, the drains are not serving their intended purpose of draining the gutter line. Settlement on each end of the structure results in ponding water which does not drain to the structure. The south sidewalk is in good condition with only minor scaling and spalling along the curb line. A nine inch section of curb in the southwest quadrant has been broken off. In sounding the sidewalk there is a very hollow sound in the longitudinal direction between the railing and curb line. The sound is probably attributed to the shallow slab section as shown on the plans. There is, a transverse crack across the sidewalk but there does not appear to be any concrete deterioration. The north sidewalk is generally in a similar condition as the south. However,' there are five transverse cracks. The face of the curb line has additional, spalling and exposed reinforcement primarily due to inadequate cover. The steel railing is in relatively good condition with only minor surface rusting and pitting. An anchor bolt has rusted and broken off at the northeast rail post just east of the abutment pedestal. The concrete pedestals on the structure and wing walls appear to be in relatively good condition with only minor surface scaling and cracking. The fill slopes are eroding along each of the four wing wall pedestals. Access to the entire underside of the structure was not possible due to a relatively high water conditions in Weller Creek. The underside of the deck appears to be in relatively good to fair condition with no significant areas of spalling or cracking. There appears to be a significant efflorescence in the fillet section between the beam and slab; however, access to this area is not possible and therefore can not substantiate the degree of concrete deteriorationThere is an area of spelled concrete in the second bay from the north immediately west of the east abutment. This spalled area is due to inadequate concrete cover over the reinforcing steel. The reinforcing steel is heavily rusted and this may be an indication that moisture is penetrating the deck and has not started the overall concrete deterioration process. There appears to be several areas of wetness and dampness on the bottom side of the slab in the second, third, and fourth bays from the north side. The largest area is approximately 4 1/2 by '4 1/2 -feet. These damp areas will probably require a full depth repair. The fourth bay from the north has heavy water staining and transverse cracking particularly on the east half of the span. Approximately one half of the bay will probably result in full depth replacement. The bay between and along the longitudinal construction joint shows signs of heavy efflorescence and cracking with the entire qLrea damp and extending down on to the, T -beam. It is anticipated that the majority of the bay will require full depth replacement. The fourth bay from the south has three areas of dampness on the underside with the largest area being approximately three feet by five feet. There are three transverse cracks with efflorescence. The third bay from the south also shows signs of dampness with the largest area being approximately six feet by five feet. There is some minor transverse cracking with efflorescence at the east abutment but the concrete appears to relatively sound. The second bay from the south shows signs of dampness and cracking extending from the east abutment approximately seven feet into the span. The exterior bay is in relatively good condition with no major areas of deterioration. The exterior girder has some minor spalling along the outside the lower flange but this does not appear to be significant. The concrete diaphragm at the longitudinal construction joint at the west abutment shows signs of significant dampness and overall deterioration of the concrete. The west abutment has four vertical hairline cracks with the largest extending full depth and the others approximately six feet. There does not appear to be any major deflection, rotation, or settlement of the west abutment. The east abutment is in generally the same condition as the west but has four minor vertical cracks none of which extend the full height of the abutment. The efflorescence does appear to be a little greater on the east abutment. A storm sewer discharges through the east abutment just north of the longitudinal construction joint. The discharge is causing some erosion along the front face of the abutment. The drain holes in both abutments are approximately 4 1/2 feet above the existing water elevation. It would appear from water stains on the abutment face that high water is approximately 2 1/2 to 3 feet above the existing condition. JL:ppc TR/M/GS3 3 DONOHdE & ASSOCIATES, INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS CLIENT fV4 kTE Joll CMM L PROJECT _Ltn<olm 5io By _fp- PROJECT No. 1704-) ?AGE NO. C,-oss s4r4o, DONOHUE '61 ASSOCIATES, INC . CLIENT t ✓3 �` F� ons TE Jvra �07 ;,ONSULTING ENGINEERS PROJECT BY _fRC�„_ CFS PROJECT NO. f-70 PAGE NO. Qyer�y San+P%!r DOVO"U' & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTINGENGINEERS CLIENT ')ATE PROJECT 5- BY J -RL CM PROJECT No. 1 "7061 PAGE NO- rn 1:5 S DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, IN( CONSULTING ENGINEERS r A/, l-" ,s'L a., DATE Jma ?EOjECT Linc-1-iS4 BY-JRL- CHRD :IR07ECT PAGE NO. Al, Az Cracks sFalls , a,-"/ arla/ DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS ..Jura PROJECT By JRt- CHKD PAGE NO. Lc A-7 1 4u cJir7.a / C-rsr-L it -i Sw4scoz L DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, I.' CONSULTING ENGINEERS CLIENT _L�14,Pr-�o,5 DATE ..puna '99 PROJECT BY J R L CHILD PROJECT NO. / 7 0 6'� PAGE NO. Sgo�kras4 Curb lae_� oic 500cl c6-a/?la5-2 and 411 /nj w a 1 f- in curb aewl P01-1 1111C, a f vv DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC, -;- CONSULTING ENGINEERS CLIENT A/4. Pro,sg�,_. DATE JurlZ '89 PROJECT Llrlcoin S . BY JRL CHKD PROJECT NO. 1-706-3 PAGE NO. _TZ/ F4 r- a / )=1ccr-c4"-a I n Car14atr- of Spari - Sovlln Curio Lina) DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS GtIENT Mf errai r. DATE -Iforia 81 PROJECT BY JR.( CHKD PROJECT NO. /709-) PAGE NO. DOVTQHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS P/I DATE Jvria f 91 PR.(.),JF,CT Z I rl c. BY JF2L CHKD PRO,jECT NO„ -11/—/OG-7 PAGE NO. o1 Dzr-L DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC CONSULTING ENGINEERS C -LI rN,-T W4a2f DATE �iuna 87 -- PROJECT 4 BY -SQL Cm PROJECT NO. PAGE NO. E DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, IN - CONSULTING ENGINEERS CLIENT �✓ "%~„ r� DATE lona X191 PROJECT LInGoln 51 BY JR.L CHIKD PROJECT NO. PAGE NO. all r . " r � r ». •. err „d 7 n:'ri� • r e ' r rW " ", ...... .. ...... .. Undar��d¢ a:-4-'acL DONQHUE & ASSOCIATES, 11110 CONSULTING ENGINEERS c--l-H-�-, A/14 E�F1� DATE Jona __ 5t. BY JRA. CHKD -70( PAGE NO. ur'.14,51ja Ozck'- _ /3aj S."A DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, I. CONSULTING ENGINEERS DATE Julicz t PROEC- By J RL Cmm PRO, EC 11"0. PAGE NO. A 4 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS cl-l"I"ll-i /44- - DATE Juno 'f" PROJECT L) r7 5- BY JQL CHKD PROJECT NO /7061) 1 - PAGE NO, Suzy No 2 DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, IN, CONSULTING ENGINEERS CLIENT DATE Ju -a t49'7 PROJECT BY JR L CHKD PROJECT NO. -7c( 7 PAGE NO. Ala 2 130NOHUE & ASSOCIATES, 11, CONSULTING ENGINEERS ni-_'T MP,32� DATE Juna 87 PROJECT Qncln s� BY Jf�Z L CHKD PROJECT NO. 1-70(--) PAGE NO. st,,r, D,cA a .2 Ea, � A 16 o {rrjam /V. Az s7'�-a 6,zl a -,,I cz)�_la,%.s D ONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, IN, CONSULTING ENGINEERS CLIENT tvlf Rr—Pa-,, DATE -lwr�a g9 PROJECT Linc,1r, 54, BY JQ L CMCD PROJECT NO. /706i PAGE NO. till lit CM Nxrx * � 4• A A - rY t' Mi+n, r i 6 x 'µi -'Mrr kr"" �' PAYSy y jar h sy QIRV.,. s Exh,6i { C f1L2'1JAFE: ESTIMATE.1 STATE OF ILLINOIS Project`LINCOLN STREET 'DATE: JLNE 29, 1989 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Route S.N. 016-4003 LAST UPDATE: JUNE 22, 1989 Section 89 -00104 -00 -BR DQ*KIE PROJECT: 17069 County COOK ESTIMATE OF COST PAGE 1 Prepared for: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, 100 SOUTH EMERSON, NOWT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056 1 QUANTITY I I 1 UNIT I ITEM 1 q CODE q 1 NUMBER 1 UNIT PRICE I I TOTAL PRICE i I I 39 1 $468.00 1 LIN FT I PREFORMED JOINT SEAL 1 3/4" 1 50300110: 1 $12.00 1 I 250 1 SQ YD I PROTECTIVE COAT 1 50300300 1 $7.50 1 $1875.00 1 i 1 1 L SLIM I CLEANING AND PAINTING STEEL RAILING NO. 1 1 50904200 1 $1200.00 1 $1200.00 1 I 2350 1 POND I REINFORCEMENT BARS 1 51200100 1 $0.75 1 $1762.50 I I 190 1 SQ YD I BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE REH0A 1 61701000 1 $7.50 # $1425.00 I 1 190 1 SQ YD I MIDGE DECK CONCRETE OVERLAY OPTIUN I Z0006000 1 $45.00 i $8550.00 1 1 190 1 SQ YD I CQr(:RETE BRIDGE DECK SCARIFICATION (1/4 INCH) 1 Z0012100 1 $8.00 1 $1520.00 1 1 6 1 EACH I DECK DRAINS TO BE ADJUSTED ► Z0015806 1 $150.00 1 $900.00 1 I 26 1 SQ YD I DECK SLAB REPAIR (FULL DEPTH, TYPE 1) q Z0016001 1 $200.00 I $5200.00 I 1 14 1 SQ YD I DECK SLAB REPAIR (FURL DEPTH, TYPE II) I Z0016002 1 $250.00 1 $3500.00 I I 150 1 SQ YD I DECK SLAB REPAIR (PARTIAL) 1 Z0016200 1 $95.00 I $14250.00 1 I 100 1 LIN FT I EPDXY CRACK SEALING I ZD020300 1 $15.50 ( $1550.00 I I 5 1 I I I 1 1 I I I 1 # 1 I CU FT I EPDXY MORTAR REPAIR I 1 I 1 1 1 1 Z0020400 1 I 1 # I 1 I 1 I I 1 $75.00 ( 1 1 q ( I $375.00 I i I I I q 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I q 1 1 I 1 I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I 1 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I 1 q I 1 I 1 I I 1 q I I 1 # 1 I q 1 I I # I I # I I I I 1 1 I I 1 I I 1 I # I I I q I 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I Probable estimate of construction cost for items sWA above I 1 # I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I 1 1 I I i I I I I 1 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1 $42575.50 1 10% Contingency Factor - $4257.55 Total probable construction cost estimate = $46833.05 FIL&K. ESTIMATE.2 HATE: JUNE 29, 1989 LAST UPDATE: JLNE 22, 1989 DOME PROJECT: 17069 EYk1164 D STATE OF ILLINOIS Project_ LINCOLN STREET DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Route S.N. 016-4003 Section _89 -00104 -00 -BR County COOK ESTIMATE OF COST Probable estimate of construction cost for iters shown above I $96845.00 10% Contingency Factor = $9684.50 Total probable construction cost estimate = $106529.50 PAGE 1 Prepared for: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, 100 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUM PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056 I QUANTITY I I I UNIT I ITEM I I CODE I I NUMM I UNIT PRICE I 1 TOTAL PRICE f I I 35 C TCN I BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE, CLASS 1 1 40600800 1 $75.00 1 $425.00 1 I 1 1 EACH I RRMVAL OF EXISTING SUPERSTRUCTURE 1 50101500 1 $8000.00 1 $8000.00 1 I 7.5 1 CU YD I CONCRETE REMOVAL 1 50102400 1 $150.00 1 $1125.00 1 I 30 1 CU YD I STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (SPECIAL) 1 50200200 1 $15.00 C $450.00 1 I 20 1 CU YO I CLASS X CONCRETE SUPERSTRUCTURE 1 50300250 I $375.00 1 $7500.00 1 I 250 1 SQ YD I PROTECTIVE COAT 1 50300300 1 $7.50 1 $1875.00 1 1 7 1 CU YD I CLASS X CRETE 1 50400300 1 $325.00 1 $2275.00 1 I 2130 1 SQ FT I PRECAST PRESTRESSED CONC DECK BEAMS (21" DEPTH) 1 50500400 1 $17.50 1 $37275.00 1 1 1695 1 SQ FT I MEMBRANE WATERPROOFING 1 50600100 1 $12.00 1 $20340.00 1 1 171 1 LIN FT I STEEL RAILING 1 50801100 1 $55.00 1 $9405.00 1 I 3500 C POUND I REINFORCEMENT BARS 1 51200100 1 $0.75 1 $2625.00 1 1 190 1 SQ YD I BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVAL. 1 61701000 1 $7.50 1 $1425.00 1 I 100 1 LIN FT I EPDXY CRACK SEALING I Z0020300 1 $15.50 1 $1550.00 1 I 5 1 CU FT I EPDXY MORTAR REPAIR I Z0020400 1 $75.00 1 $375.00 1 Probable estimate of construction cost for iters shown above I $96845.00 10% Contingency Factor = $9684.50 Total probable construction cost estimate = $106529.50 "FIL7* E: ESTIMATE.3 iaATE: JUNE 29, 1989 LAST UPDATE: JUNE 22, 1989 DONOIRIE PROJECT: 17069 Prepared for: VILLAGE I --I - I QUANTITY I WIT I 1 I EACH 1 17 1 CU YD 1 35 1 CU YD I 4 1 EACH 1 95 1 CU YD 275 1 SQ YD 10 294 172 2000 19600 190 175 120 100 CU YD LIN FT LIN FT POUND POUND EACH SQ YD EACH EACH LIN FT CU FT STATE OF ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ESTIMATE OF COST OF Project LINCOLN STREET Route S.N. 016-4003 Section 89 -00104 -00 -BR County COOK OF PAGE 1 MOUNT PROSPECT, 100 SOUTH EMERSON, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056 I ITEM I CODE I UNIT PRICE 1 TOTAL PRICE 1 I NUMBER I 1 I I REMOVAL OF EXISTING SUPERSTRUCTURE 1 50101500 1 $8000.00 1 $8000.00 1 I CONCRETE REMOVAL 1 50102400 1 $150.00 1 $2550.00 I 1 STRUCTURE EXCAVATION (SPECIAL) 1 50200200 1 $15.00 I $525.00 1 1 FLOOR DRAINS 1 50300100 1 $250.00 1 $1000.00 I I CLASS X CONCRETE SUPERSTRUCTURE 1 50300250 1 $375.00 1 $35625.00 I 1 PROTECTIVE COAT 1 50300300 1 $7.50 I $2062.50 I 1 CLASS X CANDOE 1 50400300 1 $325.00 1 $3250.00 1 1 F 6 E PRECAST PRESTRESSED CLIC I -SEAMS, 36 IN. 150500800 1 $48.00 1 $14112.00 1 1 ALUMINUM RAILING 1 50800500 1 $42.00 1 $7224.00 1 REINFORCEMENT WS 1 51200100 1 $0.75 1 $1500.00 I 1 REINFORCEMENT BARS, EPDXY COATED 1 51200200 1 $0.85 1 $16660.00 1 RELOCATING NAME PLATES 1 51400200 1 $150.00 1 $150,00 I 1 BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE REMOVAL 161701000 1 $7.50 # $1425.00 1 BAR SPLICES 1 Z0002600 1 $10,00 I $1750.00 1 DRILL AND GROUT DOWEL BARS 1 ZOOIS900 1 $14.50 i $1740.00 1 EPDXY CRACK SEALING p 20020300 I $15.50 1 $1550.00 1 EPDXY MORTAR REPAIR 1 Z0020400 1 I I $75.00 1 1 $375.00 I I 1 I I I I 1! I I 1 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I 1 i # I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I 1 I 1 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 9 I I i 1 I I I i 1 I 1 I I I i I I 1 1 I ! I I I I I I I 1 I I ! I I I I I I 1 I I 1 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i I I 1 1 I 1 I I 1 I I I 1 1 I I I I Probable estimate of construction cost for items shown above _ I $99498.50 1 10% Contingency Factor = $9949.85 Total probable construction cost estimate = $109448,35 RESOLUTION A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RELATIVE TO THE INSTALLATION OF OPTICOM)UIPMENT ON EQa R_ NJ RIVER ROAD WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that it would be in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect to enter into an Agreement with the State of Illinois, Department of Transportation, for the improvement of U.S. Route 45 (River Road) known as State Section 3219WRS(80), a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "All; and WHEREAS, in compliance with the aforementioned Agreement, it is necessary for the Village of Mount Prospect to appropriate Funds to pay its share of the cost of said improvement, specifically the installation Of Opticom equipment on River Road at the intersections of Seminole (old Willow Road) Lane, Euclid Avenue and Camp Mc Donald Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE,IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE -5F MCUMT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SE,91ION ONE:. That the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his signature on the Agreement between the Village of Mount Prospect and the Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois for the installation of Opticom equipment on River Road, at the intersections of Seminole Lane (old Willow Road) , Euclid Avenue and Camp Mc Donald Road, a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION TWO: That upon the contract be awarded for th,&, installation of the Opticom equipment being the subject of this Resolution, the Village of Mount Prospect agrees to pay $17,250.00 to the State of Illinois, Department of Transportation as its share of said improvement. SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1989. Gerald L. Farley ATTEST: Mayor Carol A. Fields Village Clerk � � ^'U 1111MLis Department ^- - of Transportation Division Highways/District 1 11 201 West Center Court/Schaurn burg, Illinois/60196-1096 CERTlFIED MAIL July 27, 1989 BUREAU Village of Mount Prospect/State uf Illinois U.S- Route 45 Improvement F.A.P. Route 124 State Section: 3219NKS(80) Cook County The Honorable Carolyn H. Krause Mayor Y1||uge of Mount Prospect lOU South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, IL Attn: Mr. Herbert Weeks Dear Mayor Krause: Enclosed are two (2) copies of a revised Joint h provides for the installation of Optiuom equipment in the subject improvement' Please have the Agreement executed and return both copies to this office for further processing' Please be advised that in order for this project to meet its scheduled letting, the executed Agreement must be received by this office prior to August 14^ 1989' Should you have any questions regarding the above, please feel free to contact Mr. Earl Jandaoek at (3}2)705-4238' Very truly yours, James C. Slifer, P.E. District Engineer Ken7macanaer, P.E. of - Bureau Chief of Design Enclosures Section N offif ob" 3219WRS(8ng Zr6it State:_ 0) Tgn Local Agency: 8.2=091Qa=Qq-TL Local Agency Job No. C- 93-388-87 Joint Agreement County Cook Agreement No.: J - This AGREEMENT entered into by and between the State of Illinois, acting by and through its Department of Transportation hereinafter called the State, and the V111 age - of of the State of Illinois, hereinafter called the LA. WITNESSETH Mt. Prospect Whereas, the State, in order to facilitate the free flow of traffic and insure safety to the motoring public, is desirous of making the improvements described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof and further identified as follows; and Route: 11-1. Rolite 45 (F.A.P. 124) LA Street Name:,_ (Des Plaines River Road/Lee Street) Termini: Willow Road to Illinois Route 58 Whereas, the LA is desirous of said improvements in that same will be of immediate benefit to the LA residents and permanent in nature; Now, Therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: Article I The State Agrees: 1. To make the surveys, obtain all necessary right-of-way, (if required), prepare plans and specifications, re- ceive bids and award the contract, furnish engineering inspection during construction and cause the improve- ment to be built in accordance with the plans, specifications and contract, 2. To pay all right of way (if applicable), construction and engineering costs, including the cost of any Railroad adjustments, subject to reimbursement by the LA as hereinafter stipulated. The State will negotiate with the Railroad(s) for any required adjustments. 3. Upon final field inspection of the improvement and so long as the route is used as a State Highway, to maintain or cause to be maintained, the median, the through traffic lanes, left and right turn lanes and the curb and gutter or stabilized shoulders and ditches adjacent to those lanes. Article 11 The LA Agrees: 1. To reimburse the State for its share of construction, engineering and/or right-of-way costs as determined in Exhibit B attached hereto and made a part hereof and in the manner described in Exhibit C. 2. To pass a resolution appropriating sufficient funds to pay its share of the cost of this improvement a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit C and made a part hereof and will pass a supplemental resolution if the original amount appropriated is insufficient to cover their final costs. 3. To adopt, prior to the State advertising for bids, or continue to enforce an ordinance requiring parking within the designated parking lanes be parallel to the curbs and prohibited at all other locations within the limits of the improvement, a copy of which is attached hereto and will in the future, prohibit parking at such locations on or immediately adjacent to the improvement as may be determined necessary by the State from traffic capacity studies, 4. To adopt, prior to the State advertising for bids, or continue to enforce an ordinance relative to the disposition of encroachments and prohibiting in the future any new encroachments within the limits of the improvement, a copy of which is attached hereto. The disposition of encroachments will be cooperatively determined with LA and State representatives. 5. To provide prior to the State advertising for the work to be performed hereunder approval of the plans and spe- cifications as prepared, by resolution or letter. 6. To prohibit driveway entrance openings to be made in the curb, as constructed, without the written consent of the State. 7. To exercise its franchise right to cause private utilities to be relocated at no expense to the State. S. To cause LA owned utilities located on right Of way acquired by the State or installed within the limits of a roadway after the said roadway was taken over for maintenance by the State, to be relocated and/or adjusted at no expense to the State. an 1171 (D CL (2) a 13 < C < CL B E Q (D (D 9. Upon final field inspection of the improvement to maintain or cause to be maintained those por a < z < W tions of the improvement which are not maintained by the State including: 13 M 11 EJ A. Parking lanes and the curb and gutter adjacent thereto El 1 0 7 B. Highway lighting system including furnishing the electrical energy therefore. C. Storm Sewers and Appurtenances El 11 El (1) Applicable when storm sewer system constructed for State highway drainage only: to perform those functions necessary to keep the sewer in a servicable conditior including cleaning sewer lines, inlets, manholes and catch basins along with the repair or replacement of inlet, manhole and catch basins' frames, grates or lids plu: structural failures to a maximum length of 12 feet between adjacent manholes. The maintenance, repair and/or reconstruction of storm sewers constructed as part of this improvement beyond the aforedescribed responsibilities shall be that of the State. El 7 (2) Applicable when storm sewer system constructed as a joint LA and State use facility: to perform those functions necessary to keep the sewer in a servicable condition including cleaning sewer lines, inlets, manholes and catch basins along with the repair or replacement of inlet, manholes and catch basins' frames, grates or lids plus structural failures to a maximum length of 12 feet between adjacent manholes. The LA and State shall share the cost of maintenance, except as aforedescribed, repair and/or reconstruction of the joint use sewer(s) to the same proportioning as the sewers initial construction costs were proportioned, El 7 D. Sidewalks parkways, guardrails, crosswalk and stopline markings and LA owned utilities inclucing the appurtenances thereto. 7 ❑ D 10. To adopt, prior to the State advertising for bids, or continue to enforce an ordinance prohibiting the discharge of sanitary sewers and industrial waste into any storm sewer or drainage facility constructed as a part of this improvement, a COPY of which is attached hereto. Article III It is mutally agreed: 1. Traffic signal maintenance and the electrical energy therefore shall: 0 ED A. continue to be as outlined in the Master Agreement executed by the State and LA on March 3 19 82_ B. be proportioned between the parties hereto in accordance with Exhibit D attached hereto and made a part heretof. 2. This Agreement and the covenants contained herein shall be null and void in the event a contract covering the construction work contemplated herein is not awarded within three years subsequent to execution of the Agreement, 3. This Agreement shall be binding upon and to the benefit of the parties hereto their succes- sors and assigns. Article IV Attached hereto and made a part hereof are Attachments which either amend the aforesaid covenants and/or supplement the terms of this Agreement. Executed on behalf of the LA State of Illinois, Department of Transportation this — day of — 19 Executed on behalf of the State By this — day of — 19 Title Attest BO 2173A Director of Highways U.S. Route 45 F.A.P. 124 State Section: 3219WR3(80) Village of Mt. Prospect Cook County Exhibit A (U.S. Route 45 Trom W111OW Koad to Illinois Route 58) A. U.S. Route 45 - from Willow Road to Tllinoiq Routp .9A m mniseiom frnm Roadway mening to *u^ edge to edge to provide two 12' through anes in each direction complete with curb and gutter, upgrading of storm sewer system, chanmelizing various intersections and complete resurfacing throughout; B. ; Relocation m loop detectors and roadway resurfacing; C. U.S. Route 45 @ Euclid Avenue: Relocation or /uup detectors and roadway resurfacing; D. U.S. Route 45 at Camp McDonald Road: Intersection cnanne|izatnun to provide one 12' left turn lane on the south leg of U.S. Route 45 and to provide one 72' left turn lane on the west leg of Camp McDonald Road and installation of new traffic signals; E. Installation of OPTICUM equipment at three (3) intersections; U.S. Route 45 @ l> Willow Road, @ 2) Euclid Avenue and @ 3) Camp McDonald Road and by performing all other work necessary to complete the improvement in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. EXHIBIT B ESTIMATE OF COST AND PARTICIPATION FEDERAL STATE VILLAGE TYPE OF WORK COST % COST % COST % TOTAL All Roadway and Traffic Signal Work including P&C Engineering $2,040,000 85.0 $360,000 15.0 $ NIA $2,400,000 OTHER WORK: Installation of OPTICOM equipment at U.S. Route 45 @ 1) Willow Road 2) Euclid Avenue 31, Camp McDonald Rd. $ NIA $ N/A $15,000 100.0 $ 15,000 P&C Engineering (15%) PN/A $ N/A $ 2,250 100.0 $ 2,250 TOTAL $2,040,000 $360,000 $17,250 $2,417,250 * LA participation shall be predicated on the percentages shown above for the specified work. The LA cost shall be determined by multiplying the final quantities times contract unit prices plus 15% for construction and preliminary engineering. EXHIBIT C WHEREAS, the Village has entered into an agreement with the State of Illinois for the improvement of U.S. Route 45 known as State Section: 3219WRS(80); Village Section: . and WHEREAS, in compliance with the aforementioned agreement, it is necessary for the Village to appropriate Funds to pay its share of the cost of said improvement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that there is hereby appropriated the sum of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND, TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY DOLLARS (.17,250.00), or so much thereof as may be necessary, from any money now or hereafter allotted to the Village to pay its share of the cost of this improvement as provided in the agreement; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that upon award of the contract for this improvement, the Village will pay to the Department of Transportation of the State of Illinois, in a lump sum from any funds allotted to the Village, an amount equal to 95% of its obligation incurred under this Agreement, and will pay to the said Department the remainder of its obligation (including any non -participating costs for FA projects) in a lump sum, upon completion of the project based upon final costs. Exhibit D Add to Article III, Item #1 the following language: The financial responsibility for the maintenance of the "OPTICOM" pre-emption equipment shall be borne entirely by the Village and maintenance shall be performed in accordance with the provisions for "OPTICOM" maintenance in said Master Agreement, which was executed on March 3, 1982. Illinois DepartMen,.- Resolution for Improvement by-iunicipality Construction ion of Tramportation Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor And Board of Trustees ca."'I W 8-.0 of the Village of Mount Prospect Illinois that the followino described -trP.Pt1q1 ha im—n—A —.4— 66. Name of 7horoughtare Route From To Route 45 Lee Street Willow Road Rr- IT CI OTUCO MCC 1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of Traffic Signal Improvements Installation Of OPticom Equipment and shall be constructed feet wide and be designated as Section 89 -00105 -TL 2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional) sum of Seventeen Thousand Two Hundred Fifty 1 17,250 mprovement of said section from the municipality's allotment of MotoDollars (S Tax funds. ) for the r Fuel 3. That work shall be done by Contract A (Spocily Cmuw W 0.1 1. 1 - " , BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk Is hereby directed to transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office Of the Department of Transportation. APPROVED 19— Dw—1 [.9- 3LR 4 103 (Rev. 6/86) ,494-0352 1. MW � Crol �A. Fields Village Mrs. — —1 (Cdy. Clerk in and for the Village of Mount Prospect ICAy. T~. w vai.vol County of Cook ., h,.4reby certify the foregoing theto b%trug- pRgacWgramg�ttM,91&Lesolution adopted by yo IC0u"0 " Pf—~l ..d 8o 4 01 T,.*I-.i Augest 15, 1989 , 19— IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto Set my hand and seal this ,day of A.D. 19—. (SEAL) Clerk. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION AUGUST 2, 1989 The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to order by Chairman Donald Weibel at 8:00 P.M. at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson St., Mount Prospect, Illinois. ROLL CALL Present upon Roll Call: Absent: Village Staff Present: Press Staff Present: APPROVAL OF MINUTES Frank Boege Tom Borrelli Lynn Kloster Tom McGovern William Navigato Louis Velasco Donald Weibel, Chairman Frank Breitsameter Errol Richardson Michael Sims, Staff Planner Joyce Harper, Mt. Prospect Journal & Topics It was noted that commission member Tom McGovern's name was erroneously omitted as being present in the minutes of the July 19, 1989 meeting. Mr. Velasco moved, seconded by Mr. Navigato, that the minutes of the July 19, 1989 meeting(as corrected) be approved. All members voted Aye and Chairman Weibel declared the minutes approved. SUBDIVISIONS St. Paul School, 100 S. School Street - The applicant was requesting Development Code modifications for carraige walks in parkway, street lighting and parking lot. Carraige Walks were requested in the parkway on School Street and on Busse Avenue to allow the unloading of students on a clean walking surface and protect the parkway grass area. Mr. Velasco moved, and Mr. Boege seconded, that permission be granted to construct carraige walks on School Street from the north end of the existing building southerly to the Busse Avenue sidewalk and on Busse Avenue from the western point end of the new building, yet to be built, easterly to the School Street sidewalk. The vote on the motion was 6 Aye; 1 Nay and Chairman Weibel declared the motion passed. PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES AUGUST 2, 1989 Mr. Borrelli stated that he voted didn't believe the carraige walk for which it had been proposed. PAGE 2 nay on the motion because he would accomplish the purpose Street L.ights - Request to allow the existing Commonwealth Edison wood pole street light equipment in lieu of Village of Mount Prospect street light requirements was made by the applicant. Mr. McGovern moved, and seconded by Mr. Velasco, to grant the applicant's request providing that they sign a covenant that Mt. Prospect lighting will be installed at the time other property owners in the area are requested to do so. Vote on the motion was 4 Aye; I Abstain; 2 Nay and Chairman Weibel declared the motion passed. Mr. Boege stated that he voted Nay because he thought that allow- ing this request would set a bad precedent. Parking Lot _ Applicant was requesting the parking lot to remain as is, without curbs. There was considerable discussion and com- ments made that the parking lot was currently in poor condition and needed upgrading. Mr. Robert Moore, attorney for the appli- cant, stated they were agreeable to a time limit subsequent to the date of building occupancy permit for upgrading the parking lot. Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. McGovern, to approve the applicant's request with the provision that the lot be resurfaced within two years of the date of occupancy permit. Prior to a vote taken, Mr. Boege stated that he felt two years was too long a period and moved to amend the motion to a maximum one year from date of occupancy permit. Mr. Velasco seconded the amendment. Vote on the amendment was 5 Aye; 2 Nay and Chairman Weibel declared the amendment passed. Vote on the amended motion was then taken with the result, 4 Aye; 3 Nay and Chairman Weibel declared the motion failed. There was further discussion concerning the two Code modifications in the applicant's request -ie, repaving the parking lot and no curbs. Mr. Borrelli stated his vote would change if the no curbing request could be separated from the lot upgrading. Mr. Borrelli then moved, and seconded by Mr. Boege, that the applicant not be required.to put in perimeter curbing around the parking lot. The vote was 6 Aye; I Nay and Mr. Weibel declared the mati,,n passed. Mr. Kloster moved, and seconded by Mr. Velasco, to grant the modi- fication request to allow the existing parking lot to remain in its present condition with the provision that it be repaved within one year of date of occupancy permit. The vote was 5 Aye; 2 Nay and Chairman Weibel declard the motion passed. Mr. Borrelli stated that he voted against the motion because he believed the condition of the lot could present a hazardous conditionto the school children. PLAN CCMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 3 AUGUST 2, 1989 COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Community Development: Mr. Sims stated that he hoped to submit a fiscal year report on the Block Grant program at the next meeting. B. Comprehensive Plan: No report C. Development Code: No report D. Text Amendment: No report OLD BUSINESS Mr. Velasco raised a question concerning the proximity of the detention basin being within 75 feet of a building on adjacent property in the case of the Amoco Oil Station, 1631 East Euclid. He believed all adjacent property owners should be notified and havean opportunity to voice their objections. Mr. Sims stated that he had sent letters to the property owners informing them of the situation. This was subsequent to the Plan Commission meeting and action on the matter but did allow them time to attend the Village Board meeting to submit their comments. It was noted that in this case, a notice of Zoning Variation meet- ing was issued and displayed however there was no Development Code modification notice. Mr. Borrelli reported that Mr. Janonis had talked to him about the status of the Schoenbeck Road relocation and that action on it had been held up due to a jurisdiction question as to who was going to do the paving and upkeep of the road. this has been resolved and the hearing will be held shortly. Mr. Weibel commented on a recent report by the Northern Illinois Planning Commission concerning the shortage of low income housing in the suburbs. The Village of Mount Prospect has completed a Three -Year Housing Assistance Plan and a copy of the plan was passed out to the commission members, NEW BUSINESS Mr. Sims reported on the progress for designating bike routes for Mount Prospect and displayed a Bike Route Map draft. The Plan Commission had not had time to study it so no specific comments an the proposed routes were made however there were some general comments. PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 4 AUGUST 2, 1989 Mr. Weibel expressed the opinion that the routes would probably be used only by bike clubs. However, Mr. Navigato stated that bike club members attending a prior meeting had indicated they would probably not use the bike routes, in his opinion, the money would be better spent on bike safety education. Mr Velasco thought development of bike routes was a waste of time and money. Mr. Sims indicated that the next step was to get the route map draft to the bicycle clubs for their review and after that he would get back to the Plan Commission. Mr. Weibel stated that he would invite the Village Mayor for a talk to the members at some future meeting. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business, the Chairman declared the meeting closed at 10:30 P.M. Respectfully submitted Lynn M. Kloster. Secretary Phone 3121392-6000 A G E N D MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Regular meeting August 16, 1989 Trusteesw ROOM, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 8:00 P. M. I. CALL TO ORDER MAYOR ROLL CALL GERALD L FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W ARTHUR APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 2, 1989 MARK W BUSSE IV. TIMOTHY J. CORCORAN LEO FLOROS V. GEORGE R. VAN DEEM THEODORE J. WATTENBERG Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE E MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON Mr. VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 CAROL A. FIELDS Mr. Phone 3121392-6000 A G E N D MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION Regular meeting August 16, 1989 Trusteesw ROOM, 2nd Floor, Village Hall 100 South Emerson Street 8:00 P. M. I. CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF AUGUST 2, 1989 MEETING IV. SUBDIVISIONS V. COMMITTEE REPORTS A. Community Development Committee Mr. Richardson B. Comprehensive Plan Committee Mr. McGovern C. Development Code Committee Mr. Kloster D. Text Amendment Committee Mr. Velasco Vi. OLD BUSINESS VII. NEW BUSINESS A. Community Development Block Grant Fiscal Year 1988 Performance Report B. Presentation on Fair Housing Ordinance VIII. QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS IX. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-46-V-89 Hearing Date: July 27, 1989 PETITIONER: Vicki L Larson SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1901 Hopi Lane PUBLICATION DATE: July lz 1989 REQUEST: A variation from Section 21.601.A.3 in order to allow a fence to extend 16 feet beyond the rear building line along the side street on a comer lot. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: INTERESTED PARTIES: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Ronald Cassidy Marilyn O'May Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Len Petrucelli None Vicki Larson, 1901 Hopi Lane, Petitioner, stated that she would like to construct a 5 foot high wood fence running from the rear of her garage to the sidewalk and back to the creek. Instead of placing the fence at the rear of the main house, as required by Code, the extra 16 feet was needed to provide a usable back yard space. The rear of the fence would extend across a utility easement in order to protect the yard and children within from the creek. Paul Bednar, Village Planner, emphasized that the location of a fence that meets code would restrict the usable yard area, since the creek takes up a lot of the rear yard. Mr. Bednar stated that the request seemed reasonable due to the large side yard and he felt that this would have no negative impacts upon the neighborhood. Upon a motion by Mr. Lannon, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, it was moved to grant a variation, from Section 21,601.A.3 in order to allow a fence to extend 16 feet beyond the rear building line along the side street on a comer lot. Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May NAYS: None By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. Case No. ZBA-46-V-89 Page 2 of 2 Upon a motion by Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Lannon, it was moved to enter this case as Resolution Z-46-89. Upon roll call: AYES: Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon and O'May NAYS: None By a vote of 6-0 the motion passed. btepnen m. wNews Recording Secretary John Ratcliffe Jac ri Recording Secretary