Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
4071_001
Next Ordinance No. 4065 Next Resolution No. 27-89 A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D E R 0 F B U 8 1 N E 8 S REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Room, 1st Floor Senior citizen Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER Meeting Date and Time: Wednesday July 5, 1989 7:30 P. 001111111111110111111% -du-.rly 51 /fr? " Ii. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald IlSkiplf Parley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floras Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George van Geem Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg III. INVOCATION - Trustee Busse IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, June 20, 1989 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TC BE HEARD VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. PRESENTATION: 1. Acknowledge Firefighter Henry Kaup on his retirement following 27 years of service. 2. Acknowledge Lt. Ed Nastek on his retirement following 23 years of service. B. Oaths of Office to newly appointed Firefighter/Paramedics Patrick Clark and Dane Phenegar C. Oaths of Office to newly appointed Police Officers Frank Iovine, Michael Nelson, Michael Wisniewski D. Request for Class "W" liquor license for Photos Hot Dogs, 1706 - 1710 East Kensington Road, Brentwood Shopping Center. E. Appointments VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 25 -SU -89, Opus Corporation 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3777 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE Or A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WOLF AND KENSINGTON ROAD, MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance grants an amendment to the Special Use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development for a parcel of land within the Kensington Center for Business. The amendment allows for two 4 -story office buildings with a total square footage of 180,660 and a 345 foot setback from Kensington Road. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit A) B. ZBA 26-V-89 & ZBA 32 -SU -89, 801 Kennicott Place 1. ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 801 KENNICOTT PLACE This Ordinance grants variations to allow a 730 square foot garage, instead of the maximum of 600 square feet, and to allow a driveway width of 40 feet, rather than the permitted 21 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals ~scorn anded approval of these variations by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit B) 2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 801 KENNICOTT PLACE This Ordinance grants a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit C) D. Request for 3 -way STOP signs at Barberry and Juniper. This items was continued from the June 20th meeting in order to determine the placement of STOP signs at this intersection. E. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23 OF THE VILLAGE CODE TO CREATE ARTICLE XX ENTITLED "HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, RESPONSES AND CLEAN-UP LIABILITIES" This Ordinance prohibits the release of hazardous materials and establishes a fine for violations. (Exhibit D) F. ZBA 32-A-89, Text Amendments 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMEND SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance amends various parking regulations governing the Central Business District be eliminated. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends granting these amendments. (Exhibit E) G. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED "TRAFFIC CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance adds certain traffic regulations resulting from the concerns expressed by residents and recommendations of the Safety Commission. (Exhibit F) H. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XII ENTITLED "FAIR HOUSING" OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance amends the Fair Housing regulations of the Village in conjunction with the requirements of the Federal Government. (Exhibit G) IX. NEN BUSINESS A. ZBA 36-V-89, 405 North Pine The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a 1' 5" separation between structures and to allow a 3' 5" setback from the interior side lot line for a detached garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 7-0. B. ZBA 38 -SU -89, 308 Eric The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use in order to install a satellite antenna, 11 feet in height and 10 feet wide, at the rear of the house. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 7-0. X. VILLAGE MANAGERS REPORT A. Bid results: 1. Fire Department Pumper 2. Petr=-leur Products 3. Highway Maintenance 4. Handicap Doors 5. Resurfacing 6. Material Testing 7. Curb and Gutters B. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF ROADWAYS This Resolution authorizes execution of the annual agreement between the Village and the State for the Village of maintain certain State roadways as well as setting forth the amount the State will pay to the Village for providing these services. C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE FOR THE AMENDED TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN This Ordinance sets forth the steps necessary to purchase property commonly known as 25 - 31 South Main Street, in conjunction with the Redevelopment Plan. D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT This Ordinance authorizes the purchase of property commonly known as 25 - 31 S. Main St. in conjunction with the Redevelopment Plan. E. Request authorization for expenditure of $4,491.63 for the Douglas Avenue improvement. F. Status Report XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT (Exhibit H) (Exhibit J) (Exhibit K) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT June 20, 1989 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the regular meeting of the Mayor CALL TO ORDER and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to order at 7:31 P.M. Present upon roll call: INVOCATION Mayor Gerald L. Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Van Geem Trustee Wattenberg The invocation was given by Mayor Farley. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, APPROVE MINUTES moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held June 6, 1989. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None , Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $1,070,210 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 13,850 Community Development Block Grant Fund 34,765 Illinois municipal Retirement Fund 51,975 Waterworks & sewerage Fund 405,723 Parking System Revenue Fund 3,512 Risk Management Fund 44,045 P.W. Facility Construction Fund A - P.W. Facility Construction Fund B - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 5,044 Special Service Area Const. #5 - Special Service Area Const. #6 - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985), 4,262 Dowiltown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) 260 Debt Service Funds 7,287 Flexcomp Trust Fund 6,072 Escrow Deposit Fund' 19,155 Police Pension Fund - Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Fund $1,773,549 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. N Trustee Floras, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to accept the financial report dated May 31, 1989, subject to ;audit. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, 'Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS To BE HEARD George Clones, 604 S. Elm Street, asked the Board what their position is on the proposed State tax increase. Mr. Clowes stated that while a portion of that tax would benefit the Village, he did not feel this would be the appropriate method of raising taxes for the Village and recommended the Board oppose the proposal. Mayor Farley stated that the while he recognizes the fact that there is a need to increase taxes to support various projects, including education, this subject has not been discussed by the Village Board and they would not be in a position to discuss it at this meeting. EAGLE SCOUT Randy Whitecotton stated that he is at the level of CANDIDATE Scouting enabling him to apply for his Eagle status. His project is to sponsor a blood drive, in conjunction with the Village's monthly blood drive, and requested the participation of the Board members and as many residents as possible. The blood drive he is sponsoring will be on, Thursday, July 6th at the Senior Citizen Center. MAXORIS REPORT RESPECT FOR Mayor Farley presented a Resolution that would U.S.FLAG acknowledge; respect for the U. S. Flag and the appropriate methods of '`displaying the flag. RES.NO. 22-89 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,, moved for passage of Resolution NO. 22-89 A ,RESOLUTION= TO AFFIRM OUR RESPECT FOR THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. APPOINTMENTS Mayor Farley presented recommendations for appointments and 're -appointments to various Board and Commissions. BDDRC Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor to re -appoint Bart Keljik to the Business District' Development and Redevelopment Commission, term to expire May, 1993 and to appoint Paul Hoefert, 304 E. Evergreen, to that Commission, term to expire; May, 1993. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 2 - June 20, 1989 3 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor and re -appoint Tom Pekras to the Finance commission, term to expire may, 1993, and to appoint John E. Engel, 908 W. Whitegate Drive, term to expire May, 1992; Vincent A. Grochocinski, 607 S. William St, term to expire May, 1992; James Morrison, 219 S. Wa Pella, term to expire May, 1992; and, John J. Mussar, 510 Eastman Court, term to expire May, 1993, to the Finance Commission, and to appoint Richard Bachhuber as Chairman of this Commission. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Wattenberg requested the Finance commission to look into the subject of insurance. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor and re -appoint James Belohlav and George Gattas to the Fire and Police Commission, terms to expire May, 1992, and to appoint Zana Strickland, 906 W. Whitegate Drive, term to expire May, 1991. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor to re -appoint Don Weibel, Frank Boege and Thomas McGovern to the Plan Commission, terms to expire May, 1993. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. FINANCE COMMISSION BOARD OF FIRE & POLICE COMMISSION �JVAZ Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to SAFETY COMM. re -appoint Lee Beening to the Safety commission, term to expire May, 1993 and to appoint Mr. Beening as Chairman of that Commission; and, to appoint John E. Metzenthin, 1418 S. Birch Drive, term to expire May, 1992. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Mayor and appoint Brian Robertson, 19 S. Edward Street to the Recycling Ad Hoc Commission. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 3 - June 20, 1989 RECYCLING AD HOC COMM OLA BUSINESS ZBA 19-Z-89, ZBA 19-Z-89, 20 -SU -89, 21-V-89, 720 E. Rand Road' ZBA 20 -STT -89, The Petitioner is requesting the subject property ZBA 21-V-89 be rezoned ,from B-3 to B-4 with a special use to 720 E.RAND,RD. allow a drive-thru facility and variations to allow a 5 foot rear yard, instead of the required 20 feet; a 13-1/2 foot front yard, instead of the required 30 feet; and a 3 foot side yard instead of the required 10 feet, The Zoning, Board, of Appeals recommended denial of the rezoning and special use and recommended granting the variations requested. It was noted that the subject property is presently vacant, having housed a sit-down restaurant until that building was destroyed following an explosion in 1985, Mr. Kamysz owner of the property, noted that he has owned the subject property for 25 years and he had applied for similar requests approximately one year ago for a Kentucky Fried Chicken facil.ty, however, due to the 2'curb cuts proposed, those requests were denied. The currentproposal is for one curb cut and again, a drive'-thru;facility is proposed. Mr. Kamysz stated that he has attempted to secure an easement from the Courtesy ,home Center owners, which could provide egress from this restaurant in an effort to reduce the traffic that would be exiting onto Rand Road.` ,john Corn, 301 N. William Street, expressed his concerns and opposition to the proposal as presented, especially the drive-tnru window, due to the increased traffic on Rand Road, however he did express his support for the Petitioner to re -build a sit-down restaurant. The Petitioner stated that he had approached the Village after the explosion with a plan to rebuild the restaurant, increasing the size + of the building somewhat, however, he was told that he could not expand a non -conforming use, Trustee Arthur, seconded by,T,Tustee Wattenberg, moved to grant the re -zoning from B-3 to B-4, being the subject of ZBA 19-Z-89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Wattenberg Nays: Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Motion failed Trustee Van Geem; seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to grant the special use, being the subject of ZBA 20 -SU -89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Wattenberg Nays: Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Motion failed Trustee Van ,Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to grant the variations being the subject of ZBA 21-V-89.° Upon roll call: Ayes:' Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None motion carried. The proposal as presented was denied. Page 4'- June 20, 1989 a ZBA 24-V-89, 100 West Rand Road (McDonalds) ZBA 24-V-89 An Ordinance was presented for second reading that 100 W. RAND RD would grant variations in order add a 151 addition onto the existing fast food restaurant. These variations will, for the most part, bring the existing facility into conformance with the Village Code. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying the requests by a vote of -'4-0. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved ORD -NO. 4059 for passage of Ordinance No. 24-V-89 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING SPECIFIED VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 100 WEST RAND ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 25 -SU -89, Opus Corporation ZBA 25 -SU -89 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that OPUS CORP. would amend an existing Planned Unit Development (PUD) to permit two 4 -story office buildings totalling 180,660 sq, ft. to be located 345 feet from Kensington Road, instead of the previously approved one 4 -story building with 167,027 sq. ft. setback 450 feet from Kensington Road. This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at the next meeting of the Village which will be July 5th. ZBA 27-V-89, 128 N. Stratton Lane ZBA 27-V-89 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 128 N.STRATTON would permit a 10 foot side yard instead of the required 20 feet in order to replace an existing patio. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved ORD.NO. 4060 for passage of Ordinance No. 4060 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 128 N. STRATTON LANE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 29-V-89, 805 S. Wa Pella ZBA 29-V-89 An Ordinance as presented for first reading that 805 Wa Pella would permit a side yard of 31 411 instead of the required 71 511 in order to construct a two car garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. Page 5 - June 20, 1989 At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to 'waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance,` Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried, ORD.NO. 4061 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4061` AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 805 WA PELLA Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays;: None Motion carried, ZBA 30-V-89 ZBA 30-V-89, 319 S. Pine Street 319 S. PINE ST An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would allow a zero foot exterior 'side yard setback rather than the required 20 feet in order to replace an off- street parking area with paving brick; to replace an existing circular driveway; and, to allow an impervious The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approving these requests by a vote of 4-0. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee` Floros, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4062 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passageof Ordinance No. 4062 AN ORDINANCE: GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 319 S. PINE STREET Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 31-V-89 ZBA 31-V-89, 1115 South Fern Drive 1115 S.FERN DR An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would grant a variation to allow a proposed room addition to be located `6-1j2 feet from the existing detached garage, instead of the required 10 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-4. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,' seconded by, Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.' Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 6 - June 20, 1989 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4063 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1115 SOUTH FERN DRIVE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS ZBA, 26-V-89 & ZBA 32 -SU -89, 801 Kennicott Place The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a 730 square foot garage,instead of the permitted 600 square foot maximum, and to allow a driveway width of 40 feet, rather than the permitted 21 feet. The Petitioner is also requesting a special use to permit a 3 -car garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 4-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations and special use being the subject of ZBA 26-V-89 and ZBA 32 -SU -89. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next regular meeting of the Village Board on July 5th. ORD.NO. 4063 ZBA 26-V-89 ZBA 32 -SU -89 801 KENNICOTT ZBA 32-A-89, Text Amendments ZBA 32-A-89 The Village administration is suggesting amendments TEXT AMENDMENTS to Chapter 14 (Zoning), which amendments would: delete Section 14.3004, dealing with Downtown District Non -Conforming; amend Section 14.3007 to permit off- site parking by long-term lease; and amend Section 14.604 to establish an authorized variation for shared parking. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these text amendments. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the Village presently has a policy for the Downtown Business District that requires a donation of $1,800 for each off-street parking space required but cannot be provided. This requirement has not worked out and may actually discourage small businesses from expanding or improving. It is the recommendation of the staff to eliminate this requirement and refund the monies collected, approximately $5,500. Hal Predovich, Chairman of the Business District Development and Redevelopment Commission, stated that the Commission supports these amendments. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Page 7 - June 20, 1989 Appeals and administration and grant the text amendments as presented. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,' Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried, An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next regular meeting of the Village Board July 5th REFUND PARKING Trustee Corcoran, seconded. by Trustee;Floros, moved to FUND MONIES authorize the administration to refund the monies to those businessmen who paid into this parking fund. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried; SAFETY COMM. The following items were discussed by the Safety RECOMMENDATIONS Commission: STOP: BARBERRY A request for a 3-way STOP at Barberry & Juniper. & JUNIPER The Safety Commission recommended: the installation of YIELD sign on Juniper at Barberry instead of the �aque6ted STOP signs. Mr. Frank Morino stated that there are no sidewalks in this area and vehicles pull off Euclid Avenue at a high rate of speed and, continue into the residential area with no regard for the reduced speed limit. Mr. Carl Clayton stated that he lives on the corner lot and the Village has informed him that he will be required to trim and/or remove a row of hedges that extend the entire length of his property. He stated that since there are ,no sidewalks in the area, he doesn't understand, why the entire row must be affected, since, in his opinion, only, a small portion of the hedges present a sight obstruction, Assistant Village Manager Michael Janonis stated that staff would review the area and meet with Mr. Clayton to resolve these concerns. Following discussion by members of the Village Board, it was decided that this subject should be continued' to the next meeting in order to receive a: recommendation from staff as to the; exact location of the 3rd STOP sign. STOP: I-OKA & A request for STOP sign at I-Oka and Sha .Bonee Trail". SHA BONEE TR. The Safety Commission recommended the installation of a YIELD sign on I-Oka at Sha Bonee Trail and the installation of 'School Crossing' signs on Sha Bonee Trail at I-Oka. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg; moved to concur with the recommendation of the Safety Commission. Upon roll calk: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page '8 - June 20, 1989 An Ordinance will be presented July 5th authorizing a YIELD sign at Sha Bonee Trail and I -Oka. A request for traffic restrictions on Meier Road, MEIER ROAD between Lincoln and Golf. The Safety Commission recommended staff work with the Village of Arlington Heights, since it appears to be a mutual program. Trustee Van Geem,seconded by Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Safety Commission. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. STOP: A request to review traffic regulations at the inter- EMERSON & section of Emerson and Henry Streets. The Safety HENRY Commission recommended no change in the regulations. It was noted that the existing signage provides for Henry Street right-of-way with the YIELD signs on the north/south roads, however, it is the opinion of the residents in that area that the volume of traffic is actually on Emerson and not Henry and therefore the residents feel a STOP sign would be more effective. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to authorize a 4 -way STOP at Emerson and Henry Streets. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: Wattenberg Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented July 5th for first reading. The Safety Commission reviewed the parking situation BOXWOOD DRIVE in the Boxwood area and recommended the speed limit be reduced to 20 MPH and parking be prohibited`w-thin 50 feet from each corner. It was also recommended that "Pedestrian Crossing" signs be installed on Boxwood Drive at Dogwood Lane. Michael Janonis, :assistant VillageManager, stated that this area was built in Cook County and the County's parking requirements were not adequate for the density of the area. The Village Board, some years ago, provided for parking on the east sine of Boxwood in an effort to relieve some parking problems, and in line with the problem, he recommends that parking; be prohibited within 20 feet of a corner and not the recommended 50 feet, since that would eliminate some of the much need on -street parking spaces. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Assistant Manager to prohibit parking within 20 feet of the corner in the Boxwood area and to provide for the "Pedestrian Crossing" signs on Boxwood Drive at Dogwood Lane. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 9 - June 20, 1989 An Ordir reading. FRANCIS Due to t) CADILLAC LEASE Farley b the propc at 11 So storage i It was improvemi system, across tk west Ranc to reloci The propc would inN day canp, month. Mr. Frank he is wi' Bance will be presented July 5th for first ie large number of items on the agenda, Mayor nought forward an item on the agenda, namely )sal to lease the former Public Works building uth Pine Street to Francis Cadillac for the )f vehicles. noted that the Village will be making ants to the Prospect Meadows sanitary sewer which will require a construction easement Le existing Francis Cadillac car dealership on I Road. As a result, the car dealer will have ite vehicles in order to grant that easement. rsal to lease the former Public Works building ,olve a lease of 6 months of a year, with a 60 allation clause, at a rental of $1,000 per Mauro, owner of Francis Cadillac, stated that .ling to cooperate with the Village with the area to re -locate approximately 200 vehicles. He also stated that he was unaware that this land was available an may be interested in purchasing it at a later date. Mayor Farley stated that this area is presently under review for re -development and definite plans have not been made but consideration will be given to a car dealership. Trustee Van Geem stated that while he appreciated Mr.Mauro's willingness to cooperate, he asked that the proposed lease be amended to provide for a 6 month lease at $2,000 per month, with no rent to be paid during the time the Village is actually using the construction easement. Mr. Mauro stated that he would agree to those conditions. RES.NO. 23-89 Trustee Wattenberg seconded by Trustee Arthur moved RECESS RECONVENE MFT FUNDS I for passage of Resolution Nc- 23-89 I A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND FRANCIS CADILLAC Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Mayor Farley called a brief recess at 10:35 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:47 P.M. Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley Trustee Arthur Trustee Busse Trustee Corcoran Trustee Floros Trustee Van Geem Trustee Wattenberg' A Resolution was presented that would authorize the appropriation of Motor Fuel Tax Funds in the Page 10 - June 20, 1989 R n amount of $1,273 which would fund a pavement profile PAVEMENT survey through the use of soil borings. STUDY Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved RES.NO. 24-89 for passage of Resolution NO. 24-89 A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND CH.23 amend Chapter 23 of the Village Code to create HAZARDOUS regulations governing hazardous materials incidents. MATERIALS The proposed Ordinance creates a spill, leakage, etc. of hazardous materials as a violation of the Village Code and provides for penalties as well as procedures to be followed in the event such an incident occurred. This Ordinance will be presented for 2nd reading at the next regular meeting of the village Board on July 5th. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that, PREVAILING in accordance with State Statutes, establishes the WAGES prevailing wage rate for contractors doing work for the Village. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for passage of ordinance No. 4064 AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF THE PREVAILING WAGE RATES Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize ILL.PRAIRIE execution of an agreement with the Illinois Girl GIRL SCOUT Scout Council for the Boxwood Advocacy Program. ADVOCACY It was noted that this is an annual program which PROGRAM has proved to be very successful for the residents and children in the Boxwood area. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for RES.NO.25-89 Page 11 - June 20, 1989 passage of Resolution No. 25-89 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL, INC. BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays;None Motion carried. ILL.PRAIRIE A Resolution was presented that would authorize GIRL SCOUT execution of an agreement with the Illinois Prairie SUMMER PROGRAM Girl Scout Council, 'Inc. for the Boxwood area summer program. This too has been a very successful program over the past several, years. RES.NO. 26-89 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution No. 26-89 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN . AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL, INC. BOXWOOD SUMMER PROGRAM Upon roll call; Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays; None' F Motion carried. AMEND CH. 23 A recommendation was presented to amend Article XII FAIR HOUSING of Chapter '23 of the Village Code., which amendment would provide for specified areas of concern or complaints to be reviewed by the Mount Prospect Plan Commission and that recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board. The Plan Commission has reviewed this proposal and recommends approval of this amendment by a vote of 7-0. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Plan Commission to adopt the amendments to the Fair; Housing Ordinance. Upon roll call; Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next regular meeting of ,the Village Board July 5th. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT BIDS; Assistant Village Manager Michael Janonis presented the bid results for various. projects. RESURFACING Bids were requested for the resurfacing of the two VILLAGE LOTS Village awned parking lots - Maple Street and Wille Street'- however, only one bid was submitted and that was from A. C. Pavement' Striping Company. The bidder submitted two bids, one using Thermoplastic Pavement Marking at a cost of $21,659.30 and for Epoxy Pavement Marking at a cost of $21,436.30. Page 12 - June 2,0, 1989 It is the recommendation of the administration that the bid submitted by A. C. Pavement Striping Company for the Thermoplastic Pavement Marking in the amount of $21,659.30 be accepted. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the bid submitted by A. C. Pavement Striping Company for the Thermoplastic Pavement Marking in the amount of $21,659.30. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberq, Farley Nays: None Motion carried. In conjunction with the resurfacing of the Maple Street parking lot, the following bids were received for a concrete median in that lot: Bidder Amount Pyramid Concrete, Inc. $28,660.20 Hanchor Cement Contr. $30,070.00 Kings Point Gen.Cement $33,420.00 J R & V Const. Co. $36,522.00 Martam Construction $39,810.00 S & D Concrete $39,910.70 Globe Construction Inc. $44,680.00 T.S. Concrete, Inc. $88,275.00 A.C.PAVEMENT Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved PYRAMID to concur with the recommendation of the administration CONCRETE and accept the low bid submitted by Pyramid Concrete, Inc. for the concrete median in the Maple Street parking lot at a cost not to exceed $28,660.20. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg, Farley Nays: None Motion carried. The following bids were received for the installation of 811 plastic pipe storm sewer, six inlets and three catch basins on Northwest Highway between Owen and George Streets: Bidder Amount Dan Dee Construction $23,150.00 Vian Construction $23,290.00 John Rendina $24,650.00 Bongi Construction $26,988.00 Mosele & Associates $29,100.00 Martam Construction $29,350.00 Mancini Sewer & Water $32,250.00 Dominic Fiordirosa $32,803.00 John Neri $33,700.00 Schneider's Trucking $39,605.00 Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration Page 13 - June 20, 1989 STORM SEWERS: NORTHWEST HWY. BTWN OWEN & GEORGE STREETS DAN DEE CONST. and accept the low bid submitted by Dan Dee Construction in, the amount of $23,150.00 for, the installation of specified storm sewers on Northwest Highway between Owen and George Streets Upon roll call: Ayes: ,Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg, Farley Nays: None Motion carried. Mr.,Ianonis noted that the two projedljust approved, the Village; owned: parking lots resurfacing project and the concrete 'median in the Maple street lot,, ere listed in the budget as one item. These two bidreceed the budgeted amount by approximately $7,000 and an adjustment will be made in the November budget review process. FIRE DEPT. The following bids were received five Fire Department BREATHING MSA self contained breathing apparatus with spare tanks: meg Amount Able Fire & Safety $10,149.70 Mine Safety Appliance $11,655.00 W S Darley & Co. $14,051.25 ABLE FIRE & Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to SAFETY to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low bid submitted by Able Fire & Safety for 5 MSA self contained breathing apparatus with spare tanks. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur,, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, van Geem, Wattenberg, Farley Nays: None Motion carried. HOSE The following bids were received for large diameter hose for one pumper - Bidder Amount Dalton 'Fire Equipment $6,726.00 G F E, Inc. _ $6,876.65 Great Lakes Fire Equipment $7,045.00 Alexis Fire Equipment` $7,391.36 W.S. Darley & Co. $7,522.55 DALTON FIRE Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to EQUIPMENT concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low 'bid submitted by Dalton Fire Equipment for large diameter hose in the amount of $6,726.00. Upon roll call; Ayes: Arthur, ,Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg, Farley Nays: None Motion' carried, FIRE DEPT: The following bids were received for Fire Department UNIFORMS station uniforms: Bidder' Amount Kale Uniforms $373.60 Krest Uniforms $365.44 Page 14; = ,Tune 20, 1989 Mr. Janonis explained that the Fire Department personnel are entitled to purchase uniforms each year in an amount not to exceed $300.00. The bid results above reflect the total of 11 items however Kale Uniforms was the low bidder on those pieces of clothing most often needed, therefore it is the recommendation of the administration that the bid submitted by Kale Uniforms be accepted. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved KALE moved to concur with the recommendation of the UNIFORMS administration and accept the bid submitted by Kale Uniforms for Fire Department station uniforms. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur,'Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Mr. Janonis presented quotes for the telephone TELEPHONE system maintenance agreement for Village facilities SYSTEM as submitted by: MAINTENANCE Advanced Telecommunitions, Inc. Coradian/Ton Communication Systems Hughes Business Telephone, Inc. Illinois Telephone Service The quotes included several areas, however it was the recommendation of the administration that the overall low bid from Hughes Business Telephone be rejected due to poor references and the quote submitted by Illinois Telephone Service Company be accepted for the 3 year contract period. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Arthur, moved to ILLINOIS concur with the recommendation of the administration TELEPHONE and accept the quote submitted by Illinois Telephone SERVICE CO. Service company for the 3 year telephone maintenance contract beginning July 1, 1989 through June 30, 1992. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Mr. Janonis presented a request for a field change BRENTWOOD for the subdivision commonly known as the Brentwood SUB. Subdivision, located on Kensington at Wolf Road. Mr. Janonis stated that a few of the single family homes in the subdivision back up to a small shopping center. The plans for this development included a requirement for a fence between the homes and the shopping center and the developer would like to have uniformity and continue the 6 foot fence along the side property line of the home just east of the shopping center, which side yard abuts Kensington Road. The proposed fence would extend beyond the permitted rear of the house and end at the front building line of that home. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved FIELD CHANGE concur with the field change submitted by the Assistant Manager and permit a fence to extend beyond Page 15 - June 20, 1989 the rear building line of the single family home located on the northwest corner of Heritage and Kensington Road. Upon roll calli Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried, RECYCLING, Assistant Manager Janonis stated that the recycling program will begin Village -wide on June 27th and goad response has been received thus far with this program.. GRAFFITI ORD. Trustee Corcoran noted that the Village does not have a 'GraffitiOrdinance' and requested staff to explore the adoption of such regulations. Mayor Farley also asked the staff to research the possibility of halving a requirement that any building boarded up would have boarding that matched the facade of the building. This request is a result of the Bob Evans Restaurant on Rand Road that has been closed and boarded up. ADJOURN Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:21 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 16'- June 20,1989 ' VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION June 29, 1989 Cash & Invest. Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest. Balance 6/16/89 Through Per Attached Journal Balance 6/15/89 6/29/89 List of Bills Entry 6/29/89 General & Special Revenue Funds General Fund $ 2,147,116 $728,392 $491,613 <1,000> $ 2,382,895° Motor Fuel Tax Fund 815,201 - 22,809 792,392 Community Development Block Grant Fund 3,571 4,000 6,490 1,081 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 2,655 7,373 10,592 1,000 436 Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 2,910,572 170,829 65,739 3,015,662 Parking System Revenue Fund 239,798 5,724 6,818 238,704 Risk Management Fund 1,313,329 248 56,166 1,257,411 Capital Projects Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund 665,373 395 34,993 630,775 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) 408,909 - - 408,909 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) 212,502 1,956 - 214,458 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 2,611 - - 2,611 Debt Service Funds 790,626 840 - 791,466 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund 3,873 - - 3,873 Escrow Deposit Fund 1,390,510 30,025 7,068 1,413,467 Police Pension Fund 13,543,211 4,074 34,296 13,512,989 Firemen's Pension Fund 15,666,480 21,059 33,069 15,654,470 Benefit Trust Funds 3,488 - - 3,488 $40,119.825 974 915 $769,653 -0- 40 325 087 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE I ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS AHERN SIGN CO. BOND REFUND IOZ7 $10U.00 $1UO.00 AML CONSTRUCTION BOND REFUND C4706 $500.00 $500.00 ARNOLD'S RESTAURANT PARKING ESCROW REFUND $175.00 $175.UO* ARTS COUNCIL OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET ALLOC - 4TH PYMT $ITOOO.00 $19000.00 DENNIS CHAPLIN CI`TY BOND REFUND C5405 $100.00 LIDO. TANK E PUMP BOND REFUND C5424 $100.00 $100 CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT HELFENBEiN PYMT $246.68 $246.68 DEC -OUT BUND REFUND C5495 $100.00 $100.00 DES PLAINES LAWN SPRINKLERS SONO REFUND C3303 $100.00 BOND REFUND C1285 $100.00 BOND REFUND C1936 $100.00 BOND RErUNU C3804 $100.00 BOND REFUND C4053 $100.00 BOND REFUND 04075 $100.00 BOND REFUND C41Z6 $100.00 $700.00 DEWINOT CORP. i30NO REFUND 05404 $100.00 $100.00 DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT PAYROLL PERIOC ENDING 6/29/89 $352*213.29 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 6/29/89 $19923.32 PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING b/29/89 $721.34 r PAYROLL PERIOC ENDING 6/29/89 $3413.12.30 $3899250.25* HARRIET EICHHURST REFUND FINAL WATER BILL 511.40 REFUND FINAL WATER GILL $1.10 $12.( RALPH ELLERTH BOND REFUND 03611 $100.00 FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF NT. PROSPECT DUE 10 FED DEP PAY OF 6/15/89 $109591.51 DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 6/15/89 $140.16 DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 6/15/89 $35.17 r DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 6/15/89 $2x722.05 DUt TO FED DEP PAY OF 6/15/89 $522.36 $149011.75* TERRENCE FREDIANI BOND REFUND 0636 $100.00 BOND REFUND 0636 $250.00 $35C.UO ESTELLE CORNY REFUND FINaL WATER BILL $6.84 €2EFUijt) FINAL WATER JILL $.66 $7.50 GRAHAM OIL COMPANY FUEL $89404.00 $81404.00 LARRY HANOVER BOND REFUND C2671 $100.00 $100.00 HART L ASSOCIATION BOND REfUNU C4604 $75.00 $15.00 PAUL M. HELLEK AND ASSOCIATES9 LTD. WAGE OED 85M103285J $5+3.47 $543.47* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29184 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTI3- CLEARING ACCOUNTS JOHN HONOROUPOULOS BOND REFUND C51b4 ILLINI POWER PRODUCTS COMPANY INDUSTRIAL $454.00 POWER UiNIT ILLINI POWER PRODUCTS COMPANY FUNK PI)WER TRANS $2.28 FUNK PO4ER TRANS INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE VILLARKtAL PAYME4T 5100.00 VILLARREAL PYMT GARY A. KOSTKA REFUND FINAL WATER HILL $10.00 KEFUNO FINAL WATER i3ILL LEXINGTON DEVELOPMENT 30NO REFUND C476S ROBERT J. MARTENS BOND REFUND 05374 MT. PROSPECT HTG. E AIR CONDITIONING BOND RL:FUNO 1032 ANDY MURAWSKI REFUND FINAL WATER BILL $33x068.99 REFUND FINAL WATER HILL ANITA C. AND JUHN L. NAROELLA, JR.. REAL ESTATE TRF TAX REFUND NORTHWEST HEATING E AIR CONDITIONING BUND REFUND 05561 $100.00 BOND REFUND C5462 OPUS BOND REFUND 1022 3ON0 REFUND 1021 JAMES PARENT[ BOND REFUND C5575 PETTY CASH - FINANCE JEPT. MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES PENSION DISBURSEMENTS JUNE POLICE PENSION OIS' JUNE Fir;.E PENSII-' DISB PIERCE BUILDERS ESO 14U REFUND C475:2 P.J. HEATING & A.C., INC. BOND REFUND 05547 KENNETH H. RA NDOLPH BOND REFUND C54" R J E G SERER BOND REFUND 05497 MARTIN ROSINSKI BOND REFUND C540J RUSS'S ALL PLUMBING E SEWER GOND REFUNI) 05492 SAKURA RESTAURANT PARKING ESCROW R, --FUND MARK SHADLEY BOND RL-FUNt} C5577 TASU SIAMANTOURAS iJVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL SIGNS OF DISTIACTIUN INC. BUND REFUND 1043 BUND RE=tIND 1031 MARTIN SIMON & ASSOC. BOND RcrUNO C50'7 FACE 2 INVOICE AMOUNT VITAL $100.00 5100.00 559051.00 15,051.00 $Iv400.00 $454.00 $1.854.00 $541.2, $576.54 $lvI67.76 $2.28 $.22 52- $1O0.0u $100.00 $100.0" 5100.00 $100.00 6100.00 $4.56 S.44 $5.00 $10.00 $10.00* $IU0.00 5100.00 $200.00 $100.00 $100.00 $200.00 $[00.00 $100.00 f110.00 $45.00 5155.00 $34,296.0 $33x068.99 $67,365.01* $50.00 55u. $100.00 $10u.00 $100.00 1100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 $100.00 5100.00 S5,4UO.0J $5,400.00* $100.00 $100.00 $,9.64 52.86 $32.50 SlUU.OG 1100.00 1200.00 $35.00 535.UO PUBLIC REPRESENTATIGN DIVISION PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $50.48 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAG! 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6%29/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPFION INVOICE AMOUNT T9TAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS ART SOLBERG OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL $6.84 UVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL 5.66 $7.50 W. STACHURA REFUND FINAL MATER FILL $9.12 REFUND FINAL WATER BILL 5.88 $Ij.u0 SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO.t INC. CHAIR $146.25 5146.?.5 ROGER ULLMAN UVERPYMT FINAL MATER BILL 14.56 UVERPYMT FINAL MATER BILL 5.44 S5.uO VAN CLEAVE CONSTRUCTION BOND REFUND 04021 5100.0) $1=00.00 DONALD F. VANOVER REFUND FINAL WATER BILL 82.28 REFUND FINAL WATER TILL 5.22 $2.50 VINE INDUSTRIES BOND REFUND L5450 $100.00 $1uo.UO VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAYMENT OF NSF CHECK S15Z.92 DEPOSIT COiNT HANK ACCT 78-42627 $5t000.00l $59152.92# VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT REINSPECT FEE C2515 $100.06 REINSPECT FEE C4752 $50.00 REINSPECT FEE C4604 525.0u REINSPECT FEE C5027 $15.00 $190.00 WALGREEN CO. BOND REFUND C4697 $500.00 $500.00 WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CO. REFUND FINAL WATER PILL $6.76 $6.76 JOE WINTZ CONSTRUCTIO�4 BOND RLFUND 04951 5100.00 $100.()0 CLEARING ACCOUNTS ***TOTAL** 1,505tiZ4- GENERAL FUND $3bZt8`+5.40 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT :2.063.48 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND S10t5y1.51 WATER C SEWER FUND $421359.03 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND Y69331.51 CAPITAL IIPtRV. E REPL. FUND $6,451.00 POLICE PENSION FUND $34.296.02 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND b33t068.99 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND S7,U67.91 PUBLIC REPRESENTATIGN DIVISION PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $50.48 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PA(,F 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 611'3!84 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICEAMOUNT TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION *;*TOTAL** 550.tiki GENERAL FUND $50.48 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIATION REGISTRATION $270.00 $270.00* DEVELOPMENT SERVICES GROUP• INC. RESEkVAiIONS $80.0U $30.00; GLASS♦ HILL• DALLMEYER L BOTH, LTD. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES — MAY $4sT33.32 $4033.32 HOLIDAY INN EAST RESERVATION ,,8640E8691 $110.OU $110.00 HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL LMPLYMI PHYS $92.00 592.00 INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY OF Akli[JRICULTU KEGISTk,TION $650.00 $650.00 PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $113.02 , MISC EXPENSES $18.50 MI SC Ex' ENSES $12.00 '3ISC EXPENSES $135.35 $2753.87 VON HRIESEN AND PURTELL: S.C. PROFrSSIONAL SERV — MAY %2,6J4.02 $2,6+04.02 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $89B18.21 GENERAL FUND CABLE TV JPERATIONS ACCURATE TEMPORARIES TEMP SP-< $306.61) $306.60 THE HERALD J08 AD $63.63 $63.?18 ILLINOIS 3USINESS SYSTEMS. INC. iERVICL $115.50 $115.50 PHYLLIS MOLIERE PAID VOLUNTEER $25.01) GENERAL FUND FINANCE DEPARTMENT $65Z.97 SLAIR BUSINESS ScRVICES} INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $74.25 A G L CORADIAN CORPORATION ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT %192.50 PAYMENT DATE 6/29189 $93.75 $285.25 VE NI}OR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION: INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS JULY MATVT $71.00 $71.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIAT PAID VOLUNTEER $16.00 $41.00 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $65.21 $65.21 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $35.98 $35.99* EILEEN REINHARD PAID VOLUNTEER $25.00 $25.00 CABLE TV OPERATIONS MAINT A'iR:11T ***TOTAL** $652.:' GENERAL FUND FINANCE DEPARTMENT $65Z.97 SLAIR BUSINESS ScRVICES} INC. TEMP CLERICAL SEtZV $74.25 174.25 CORADIAN CORPORATION SERVICE CALLS %192.50 SERV CALL $93.75 $285.25 DATA -TECH INSTITUTE REGISTRaTION $695.00 S695.00 DECISION DATA SERVICE INC. JULY MATVT $71.00 $71.00 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIAT REGISTRATION! 1150.00 5150.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $8.50 MISC EXPENSES $8.30 516.E PITNFY BONES INC. SUPPLIES $61.20 MAINT A'iR:11T 5113.00 1174.20 PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 5157.54 ')FFICE SUPPLIES $78.07 5235.61 SPEEDY MESSENGER SEkVICE DELIVERILS $15.30 DELIVERIES $34.60 5'0.50 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TRANS T;l FUND 95 JtJPALS $14e575.06, $14x575.00 WALL STREET JOURNAL SUBSLRIPTION $129.00 $129.00 WESTON SYSTEMS CO'"PANYv INC. DATA Pk'7CESSING SERVICE, $19045.00 SIjO,+5.00 XEROX CORP. MONT'{LY CHARGES FOP 10')0 COPIER JUdE $1x521.09 MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN $201.39 $1v722.48 XL/OATACOMP INC. MAINT SERV - JUNE $12.OU $12.00 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL v $19:237.09 VILLAGE OF 'TUU"iT PROSPECT PA f 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6129/89 VENDOR PURCHASE GESCRIPTIJN INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $199237.09 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE R.T. JENKINS NEWSLETTER $19404. 71 $19904.71 MANPOWER INC. TRA114IN7 $950.00 $950. NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $53.16 POLICY <.tNcAAL PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICES $70.52 HMO ILLINOIS HEALTH INSURANCE — LEGAL NOTICES $86.44 5156.96 POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTERS $29293.05 5212,48,05* VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE JACKSON* LONG E ASSOCIATES ***TOTAL** X551372.81? GENERAL FUND 55 1372.69 JACKSON LONG JUN_ RISK MANAGEMENT ARTHUR J GALLAGHEk E Cl) POLICY ?EeNEWAL $119159.00 AUDIT Yd/C $41676.00 POLICY <.tNcAAL $1rO2Z.0J $161856.JU HMO ILLINOIS HEALTH INSURANCE — JULY $49841..34 $4+1341.34 JACKSON* LONG E ASSUCIATESI INC. JACKSO'4 LONG ADMIN FESS — JUNE $61959.03 $61459.09* JACKSON* LONG E ASSOCIATES JACKSON LONG JUNE 14-2,a $89526.40 r JACKSON LONG JUN_ 21-2T $171563.39 $Zof089.79* MEDICAL PERSONNEL POOL OF DUPAGE CITY fRFI�'%'J4RScMENT 5300.00 5300.00* NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SERVFCES RENbER*_t) $193.00 REIMBURSEMENT $264.05 Y SE-,VICL-R¢-NJER-) $136.0ki $593.05A NORTHWEST RADIOLJGY ASSUC.S.C. REIYbUu3EMENT $24.03 '529.00* POSTMASTER POSTAGE FO,� MAGA71'4ES $43.5'3 343.59* RAYMOND SMITH SE TT LEMS_' T 3257.2.3 $257.23 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPPOVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/24/89 VEN09R PURCHASE DESCRIPTION RISK MANAGEMENT STATE TREASURER, EX—OFFLCIL) CUSTODIA RATE ,BUJ' FUND ASSESSMENT RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT FUND INSPECTION SERVICES $56,166.06 INVOICE AMGUNT ti 196.'77 ***TOTAL*,: PAGE 7 T,TT AL $196.97 $56,1bh.O6 NATIONAL FIRE PRCT. ASSOC. SUBSCRIPTION $299.O0 $249.00 NORTHWEST STATIOidERS INC. OFFILr- SUPPLIES $49.71 $49.71 PETTY CASH — FIP44NCE '-JEPT. MISC EXPENSES $L9.26 MI SC -EXP 'NSE S $15.50 $44. 76A QUALEX, INC. FILO $23.90 FILM $21.73 $45.63 TELEDYNL POST OFFICE SUPPLIES $224.70 $214.70 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION SERVICt ELEV IP;'�PECTIONS $1,300.00 s1,30(t.00 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS PlJBLICAi ION $15.00 $15.00 XEROX CORP. OFFICE SUPPLIES $162.00 MONTHLY EQUITY t' AN $201.3u XL/DATACOMP INC. MAINZ SERV — JUN = $12.0'} $12.00 INSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL*-,: $2,354.18 GENERAL FUND $293-)4.18 POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PARTS SUPPLI--S $46.12 $46.12 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY CALIBRE PRESS COMMONWEALTH EDISON THE CONSTABLE EQUIPMENT CU. TED GORSKI GOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL TESTING HARRIS 3/M DOCUMc!vT PRODUCTS ILLINOIS ;SELL IELcPHONE CO. DENNIS LEONARD LION PHOTO SUPPLY IAC. LUND INUUStR1tS, INC. HARRY MOSER NORTH EAST MULTI KEGIONAL TRAINING NORTHWEST COMMUAfF Y HOSPITAL QUALEX, INC. QUICK PRINT PLUS, INC. MARK RECKER R03ERT RLEPECKI SIRCHIE FINGER PRINT LABORATORIES SKOKIE CAMERA GEORGE STEINER RALPH S. TIMM TRW INFORMATION SERVICES XL/DATACOMP INC. POLICE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE �3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/84 PURCHASE DESCRIPTI9N INVOICE AMOUNT T�. TAL SUPPLIES $20.27 $20.27 SUPPLIES 552.95 552.45 3H66 -JI -5422-A 73.57 13.57 SUPPLICS $66.5j $66.50 tXPENStS 517.89 $17.89 PSYCHOLOGICAL EXAMS $300,.00 $300.00 MAINT AG; 0-lf 5449.4U 5449. CO3-5274 $35.72 Z53-2151 $1313.51 C25-4044 $30.63 5IC-t. 86 EXPErISLS p6.00 $15.00 FILM x625.39 $625.34 PARTS $73.40 $73.40 EXPE:4S: S $13.00 $18.00 TOITION $75.00 $75.00 SERVIL'c`k 9EN0ERCu $4, 164.0+) x4,169.00 FILM $50.54 650.54 PRI^!TING EXPENSE $44.2:1 644.20 t0-E4SES $17.46 $17.48 ExPrNSES $20.20 $20.20 ,UPPLIES 571.62 $72.62 SUPPLIES $77.01 $77.01 EXPENSES $6.001 66.G0 EXP `.fS=::S $44.3u 544. REP,,JkTS $42.25 $42.2D MAINT SERV - JUNc $60.00 lho.UG $15,56d.45 ***TOTAL** •6,56-3.45 VILLAGE OF manT PROSPECT PAGE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTIUN INVOICE AMOUNT T'TAL FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. DON ANDERSON ESDA SUPPLIES $34.13 ESDA SUPPLIES $31.76 $h5.89 BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC. SUPPLIES $230.64 SUPPLIES $852.04 $1.082.68 BEAR'S IMMEDIATE TOWING C FLATBED SE TOWING $100.00 $100.,flo THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY PARTS sI1O24,36 $11024* COMMONWEALTH EDISJN BA77-JT-2404-A $8.57 $8,57 COMMTRON CORPURATION VIDE'i TRIdG EQUIP $174.50 $174.50* COMPUTER SUPPORT CENTRES CONSULTTNG $97.50 $97.50 COURTESY HOME CENTER SUPPLIES $123.92 $123.92 DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS PARI`, $156.46 1156.48 EDUCATION ALLIANCE= COMPUTt'-' CJVERS $a 2. 3C $92.80 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES REPAIR TIRE $5.50 $5.50 GREAT LAKES FIRE tO�UIPMENT SUPPLIES $130.67 113J.67 H R HART PHOTO PHOTO? SOPPLIES $464.26 $1450.26 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. CO3-527') $35,71 253-2141 $414,95 398-6389 $29.39 593-095'? $22.72 CU3-Ol UJ $197 .96 CO3-0793 $75.08 $775.84 ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTURS ASSnCIATIJN SUPPLILS $11.25 SUPPLIES $11.25 PUBLICAT1O�4S 533,00 $55.>0 INTERNATIONAL ASSUCiATION OF i-IkE Cil 545.00 t�sE�M8&RSNIP $90.013 $135.00 BRIAN IPSEN EX PEN S,ES $62.0.3 btb2.GO KAR PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIL $91.66 $031.0() KINNEY SHOE CORPOkATIJN GYM JH:i1.S $3x876.67 $3076.67 KNAPP SHOES SHOES $1.391.64 111391.64 DAVID KOSAR 3O0KS $52.00 $52.00 MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS: INC. C[;PI-R 6210,+9,95 SUPPLItS $66.00 $21155.95 MIGHTY MITES AWARDS 6 SUNS PLACID t 636.5-r $36.54 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL 3 VISIT`- - MAY $142.17 1142.17 NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC. REPAIR $412.07 5412.07 VENDOR FIRE C EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ORDER FROM HORDER PROSPECT DIVE SHIP QUALEX* INC. RED WING SHOE STORE RESCUE MAGAZINE S E K CHEVROLET SIR—PLUS AUTOMOTIVE SURPLUS PROPERTY REVOLVING FUND VITAL RECORD BANCr INC. XL/UAiACOMP INC. FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENSRAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION UFFILE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES SO RPL I '_:S PHOTO SUPPLIES SHOES SHOES SHOES SUBSLRIPTION 1989 CHEV SERVICES SUBS R IP T ION SUPPLIES MAINT SERV — JUNL - INVOICE AMOUNT S72.49 $243.60 5145.00 $05.83 S1v785.85 $31.00 $195.40 $i 8.95 $12s679.43 $59.00 $20.00 514.00 $63.0) ***TOTAL** T iTAL F316.09 5145.00 $65.83 $2rQS2.�" 518. $12:679.43* 559.00 S210.0O $10.00 $53.00 $13st39.76 bl2+/3`17.29 CAPITAL I{'PRV. & REPL. FUND $I5v332.48 v.., *****#rmr; Y*: rrrrrv;rr***** **** .„Y;>#.*mrY**rr#*MYrvr#*rvYrr********#; #r***** ****rrr: r;=; v yr *r#r; r HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT. `tISC EXRLNSE3 $6.00 HISC EXPENSES $34.59 542.59 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ***TOTAL** $42.`:9 GENERAL FUND 5'r 2.5 `4 ##vt* *; ; *****#r. #zr,** *****#r#; #r -: fir: Mrr+; *** *t **** ## *#vri rte-* **** «M;=*r: r#*.A#. +**v: #Y; * r; ****** xr VENDOR PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ARLINGTON ENGINEERING COMPANY C.D.B.G. LOAN JOURNAL E TOPICS NEWSPAPERS MURRY AND MOODY NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PADDOCK PUBLICATIjNS INC PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. QUALEXv INC. PLANNING AND ZONING ()EPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTIOA INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CDBG $21,815.00 $2.315.U0v CDBG $Is 500. 00 $11,50O.0U1 DISPLAY ADVERTISING 511,140.UC -'11,140.00 SERVICES RLNDEREJ $836.50 $836.50 +')FFICE SUPPLIES $1'?0.92 PAVIAG �4ATE-P,IAL JFFICE SUPPLIES $67.44 $258.{ LEGAL NOTICES $45.50 PARTS LEGAL NOTICES $65.97 $111.47 MISC EXPENSES $46.86 $46.86 PHUTO `kUCESSING $28.74 $28.74 ***TOTAL** 161,736.93 $21,3LO.46 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT 541,42:5.47 STREET DIVISION AETNA TRUCK PARTS SUPPLIES $235 96 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC* INC. ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION B E H INDUSTRIES BERRY BEARING CO BLACK E DECKER BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO. SUPPLIES $305.93 SUPPLIES 5107.74 TRAFFIC SIGNAL ''TAINT $41,961.10 TRAFF SIGNAL MAI.NT $720.00 TRAFFIC SIGNAL krPAIRS $171,128.4u ,iEPA1RS $155.90 SERVICE CALL $37.50 PAVIAG �4ATE-P,IAL $63.00 SUPPLIE1 $28.89 SUPPLIES $57.55 PARTS *146.98 SUPPLIES $163.05 ,2EPAlR-� $59.06 5649.63 $221,809.50 $142.50 $63.0© $28.69 $57.55 $146.98 $1603.05 $59.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PFASPECF rA 12 ACCOUNTS PAYA3LF APPROVAL REPQRT PAYMENT DATE 6/24/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTIOP INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION BUPEAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE SUBSLRIPTI'JN $73.20 $73.20 BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH, Ii4C. VEH ' AS! -I S45.5U $45.50 IIUSSE HAROWARt SUPPLLE,i $17.95 PARTS $12.57 $30.52 CLARK F. VARLOW HARDdARE CO. TOULS 541.15 641.15 ARTHUR CLESEN, INC. GRASS SEED 1635.00 $635.x0 CLS UNIFURM RtPtTALS UNIFDRM RENTAL $95.Uo UNIFU:RM RENTAL x44.67 6189. COMMONWEALTH EDISON OF80-JT-17,)06 5109.24 S109.Z4 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS CLEANING SERVICE $128.00 CLEANING SERVICE $17836.06 117464.,)0 CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLINOIS WATF� USAGF 1134.34 $139.34 DOOR SYSTEMS• INC. QEPAIRS $147.57 $147.57 EBERHART STEEL PR.UOUCTS CORP. EDGIaG $48.05 $48.05 ELMHURST MOTORS TRUCK $13.210.00 $137210.00r THE GLIDDEN COMPANY SUPPLIE; $26.63 $20.63 GOODYEAR SEKVICE STORES TIRES 347.16 $347.16 GCO THERMAL SUPPLY COAPANY PUMP $449.80 SUPPLIE`) $7.00 5506.86 P J HARTMANN COMPANY kEPAIR $150.00 5151.(J0 HOWELL TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT CU. SUPPLIL $114.99 5114.94 ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK C _QUIPMENT COMPA SUPPLIES 592.1°D $92.16 KAR PRODUCTS 1I4C SUPPLIES 31U1.74 $101.74 LAND AND LAKES CO RIFUSF ')ISPOSAL MAY 5114.00. REFUSE DISPOSAL - MAY 5114.0` REFU�)E ')ISPQSAL MAY $114.01 $342.00 J.C. LICHT COMPANY PAINTING SUPPLIES $67.8)) So7.80 MFILNER MECHANICAL SALES• INC. SUPPLIES $25.10 %25.1;0 MIGHTY MITES AWARDS L SUNS PLAQUE $35.44 PLAQUES $61.04 $915.53 NATIO-NAL HEAT AND POWL9 CORPORATION HVAC SErVICE $27800.00 a27603.00 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY [LEC S'JPPLlFS - AAY $79.0 EL EC SUPPLIES - MAY $103.92 CLEC SUPPLIES - MAY $52.11 CLEC SUPPLIES - MAY $114.71; $354.90 NORTHWEST FIRc EXTIidGUfSHER E ',v RVIC EXTI'tGUISHEI� NAI^tT g-,5,53 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6%19%89 VENDOR PURCHASE OESCRIPTIUN INVOICE AMOUNT T'7TAL STREET DIVISION �.-,-�rrrrrY*******w�*; �*****r,.,.,•,-,.r, rYr rYYv.•v.-,-, rr*Y; rrvi **•rr*; rrrr*;,rrr= *$ry*r**arrrr::=r; **r*: r-rY�-r*; ;=Yr WATER AND SEWER DIVISION AETNA TRUCK PARTS ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION B C H INDUSTRIES BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH, INC. CLS UNIFORM RE14TALS COMMONWEALTH EDIS;JN SUPPL IE"; EXTINGUISHER MAINT 565.53 $Icl9.0J PAPER EXTI'NGUI SHEt? MAINT $65.53 $44.00 UNIF;'RM RENTAL EXTIoAGOI SHER MAINT $65.53 334.67 '3J 80 -JT -23593 EXTINGUISHER MAINT $65.54 EXTINGUISHER MAINT 365.54 $393>D PETTY CASH - PUBLIC 'WORKS TRAY L & SUPPLIES TRAVEL : SUPPLIES $12.64 TRAVLL £ SUPPLIES $135.00 r TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $4,1y TRAVLL C SUPPLI" S $50.94 $211.70 POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS 1156.46 $156.48 PROSAFETY SAFEIY CLASSES $98.66 $9P. b6 SAM'S GLASS S TRIM, INC REPAIRS $210.24 $210.24 SOURCE SERVICE PARTS DISTRIBUTORS LT FILTc-RS £52,32 $52.32 STATE OF ILLINOIS 30ILIR INSPECTION 53U.Ot; $30.00 TRANSP'IRTATIUi,9 SAFETY DEVICES INC SUPPLI`5 839.44 $39.44 WESTERN ENGINE COMPANY PARTS $39.55 839.55 STREET DIVISION ***TOTAL** $47.114. 6 GENERAL FUND $1I,1`�5.36 MJTOP FULL TAX FUND ,Pv: $5 _ CAPITAL IMPRV. & REPL. FUND $13,210.00 �.-,-�rrrrrY*******w�*; �*****r,.,.,•,-,.r, rYr rYYv.•v.-,-, rr*Y; rrvi **•rr*; rrrr*;,rrr= *$ry*r**arrrr::=r; **r*: r-rY�-r*; ;=Yr WATER AND SEWER DIVISION AETNA TRUCK PARTS ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION B C H INDUSTRIES BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH, INC. CLS UNIFORM RE14TALS COMMONWEALTH EDIS;JN SUPPL IE"; .$235.97 PAVING ''lATL $Icl9.0J PAPER $62.12 VEH WAS19 $44.00 UNIF;'RM RENTAL 395.U7 UNIFJR4 RENTAL 334.67 '3J 80 -JT -23593 tib, 325.`x`? $235.97 $lr!9.00 262.12 344.00 $1P9.74 2b, 325.59 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAOr_ 1'r ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE zMOU'NT T TAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION COMMONWEALTH EDISUN OH67-JT-1310-A 54b.6G b372 -JI -8548-A $14.46 B872 -JT -560}3-0 $141.34 52Q2.42 CROWN INDUSTRIAL OIL C0.* INC. SUPPLI'-S $63.03 $68.03 E & H UTILITY SALES SUPPLIES $1.196.64 $1.196.64 E&H UTILITY SALES, INC. SUPPLIES $547.20 $747.20 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES TIRES $1:173.44 TIRES $347.16 TIRES '$141.56 TIRE FXCH 513.44 51,675.60 W. W. GRAINGER INC. SEJPPLIE'? 532.Z5 $32.25 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT HOSE $46.50 $45.50 H -B -K EATER 3ETER SERVICE REPAIR RATER METt-RS $404.26 REPAIR k4ATER METERS $551.42 $955.68 HYDROTEX9 INC. SUPPLIES $531.60 $531.60 INTE=RNATIONAL L3JSINESS MACHINES CORP COMPJTFt EQUIP $479.00 $474.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CU. Z53- J 177 $125.01 253-849.3 $17.09 956-641,) $20.46 253-,198 $24.53 CO3-ulzu $203.83 CO3-0 717 5503.43 C93-5961 $91.89 CO3-0606 $57.84 X03-0803 $30.65 CO3-')804 $28.93 CEJ3-iltJ(i) $.30.153 "1.134.77 ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK & EQUIPMENT COMPA SUPPLIt='> $53.5' 568.52 ILLINOIS SAFETY COUNCIL FILM $28.0 $28.00 J.R.& V. CONSTRUCT[i;N. CO. LONC<ET� RESTORATION 53.Et)0.0 T3.+J60.00 KAR PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIL'' $101.74 1101.74 KNAPP SHOES SAFcIY 'HOES $50.0k $50.00 LATTOF LEASING AND RE'tTALe IVC. CAR c'E;1TAL $3.024.01- $3.0G4.0J LEMS INTERNATIONAL INC. PARTS $653.74+ 565;3.74 J.C. LICHT COMPANY PAINII:IU SUPPLIES $125.ZJ $125.2:3 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELtC SUPPLIE-S - ;MAY VILLAGE OF MOUNT P40SPECT PACE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TCJAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER E SEWER FUND $23.379.91 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION COMMONWEALTH EDISON 3Hb6-JI-0498-A $71.4) dHbb-JT-3710-A 38.57 ELEC SUPPLIES - MAY 349.86 ELEC SUPPLIES - MAY $150.15 $342.23 NORTH'W'EST STATIONERS INC. JFFI;E ,UPPLIES $s2.8U $32.13'0 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS LEGAL NOTICE $20.Oti 520.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE CE PT. MISC EXPENSES $51.00 SSl.00 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVcL & SUPPLIES $12.02 r TRAVcL & SUPPLIES $21.03 TRAVEL Z SUPPLIES $4,49 TRAVEL & SUPPLIE $7.55 TRAVEL r SUPPLIES $12.39 TRAViL & SUPPLIES $77.00 , TRAVcL & SUPPLIES $12.20 $166.68* POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS 5331.9? PARTS $57.01 $398.93 PORTABLE TOOL SALES SUPPLIES 3130.017 $1'30.00 PROSAFETY SAFETY GLASSES $45.13 $45.13 RAINBOW 1 Hk PHOTJ EXP. FILM I'kOCESSIA!G $29.bF: $29.68 TECH SYN CORPORATION HOSES $6,16.00 SUPPLItS $6.79 SUPPLIE`l $25.50 S 3.29 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY SUPVLIcS $30..46 83f.46 TUFF-KOTE DINOL RUSTF PU,:;F $350.00 83hJr LIEBt7LL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS* INC. SUPPLIES $57.40 357.. WATER AND SEWER DIVISION *#$TOTALr� 523,379.91 WATER E SEWER FUND $23.379.91 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION COMMONWEALTH EDISON 3Hb6-JI-0498-A $71.4) dHbb-JT-3710-A 38.57 VILLAGE OF MjUNT PROSPECT PAG/_ 16 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT T'JTAL PARKING SYSTEM UIVISION BH68-JI-7498-A 521.4` 6H66 -JT -5266-C 6225.49 BH66-JT-5262-A 564.69 $341.73 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS CLEANING SERVICE gl+O.fTi 5140.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WATER - RR STATION 15.00 $5.00 PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $4&6.'+ PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $436.73 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION REHRIG PACIFIC C,J. RECYCLI'4G 3INS $57v110.OG 557e11G.00 REFUSE DISPOSAL DiVISION ***TUI AL** 557r11U.00 GENERAL FUND $57eI.LO.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES COMMONWEALTH EDISON 3G21 -JI -1838-A $64.29 1b4.29 MR. DUN WEIBEL LXPE_tiSc $66.40 $66.40 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $13J.69 GENERAL FUND $130.69 VENDOR PENSION FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/29/89 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION FIRST NATIONAL dA,vK OF MT. PROSPECT WITHHOLOING TAXES VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JULY MEC? lfiS PAUL H. WATKIiNS JUNE DISABILITY 3EAEFIT PENSION FUNDS GENERAL FUND $2 v 1'6.83 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $200.00 $200.00 b2c15.40 $265.40 21.701.43 $1*701.43 ***TOTAL*� S2t166."i ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $769,653.47 DATE RUN 6/Z9/89 VILLAGE OF MOU:,4T PROSPECT PAGE 19 TIME kUN 11.2i.11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING Il)-VAP155 SUMMARY BY FUND 6/29/69 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT I GENERAL FUND $4919612.81 Z2 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 5227809.50 ?3 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT 567489.95 24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETI(EMF14T FUN() $107591.51 41 WATER & SEWER tUND $657738.94 46 PARKING SYSTLM REVENUE FUND $69818.24 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 5567106.06 51 CAPITAL IMPkV. L REPL. FUND 5340)3.48 71 PJLICE PENZ ION FUND S349246.02 72 FIREMEN'S Pl-NSlQN FUND $337068.99 74 F&CROw DEPUSIT FUND $79067.91 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $7699653.47 Village of N,,cunt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 13, 1989 SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE APPLICATION - CLASS W PHOTOS HOT DOGS, 1706-1710 EAST KENSINGTON I have had a conversation with Mr. Jim Pbotopoulos, of the Taste Good Corporation, who wishes to open a sandwich shop in the new Brentwood Shopping Center. He also wishes to have a Class W Liquor License for the sale of beer and wine only at tables in the restaurant. Mr. Photopoulos is the son of one of the owners of Artemis and has been working for the last 14 years at Artemis. He has not had a Liquor license in his name in the past. It is anticipated th'.t the sandwich shop would be open seven days a week from 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. At this time, there is no consideration being given to being open later. Mr. Photopoulos anticipates a strong lunch time trade considering the proximity to the Kensington Center as well as the industrial park in Prospect Heights to the north. Furthermore, he anticipates a good evening trade because of the number of homes in the immediate area and has indicated that the quality of service and food would be very similar to Artemis. He is anticipating to open in about four months. He wishes to have consideration for the Liquor License at this time before he invests money for decorations but would not receive the License until everything is in order. N 4 11 1141 WO)HOIllaceill 113 N ID - 0 1 JFD/rcw attachment CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3777 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER WOLF AND KENSINGTON ROADS, MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS WHEREAS, Opus Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner") has filed a petition for an amendment to a Special Use with respect to property generally located on the northwest corner of Wolf and Kensington Roads (hereinafter referred to as "Subject Property"), and located within the Kensington Center for Business; and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Lot 805 in Kensington Center Resubdivision 21, in part of Northwest Quarter of Section 35, Township 42 North,Range 11, East of the Third Principal meridian, per plat thereof filed for record in the Office of the Registrar of Titles, April 20, 1988, as L. R. #3701855, excepting from said Lot 805 the following described property taken for highway by Court Case No. 87 L 51410 - beginning at the northeast corner of said Lot 805; thence south along the east line of said Lot, being also the west line of Wolf Road, 20.0 feet; thence northwesterly 28.37 feet to a point in the north line of said Lot 805, being also the south line of Kensington Road, which point is 20.0 feet west of the point of beginning; thence east along north line of said Lot, 20.0 feet to the point of beginning, all in Cook County, Illinois. and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks an amendment to the Special Use approved by the President and Board of Trustees through the adoption of Ordinance No. 3777, passed and approved May 5, 1987 to permit two 4 -story office buildings with a total of 180,660 square feet of gross floor area, rather than one 4 -story office building with a maximum gross floor area of 165,000, and, to permit a 345 foot building setback from Kensington Road, instead of the previously approved 485 feet. WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for amendment to a Special Use (designated as ZBA Case No. 25 -SU -88) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 11th day of May, 198, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 26th day of April, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, which recommendation is to grant the requested amendment to a Special Use; WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect have given further consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the amendment to the Special M ZBA 24 -SU -89 Page 2 of 2 Use governing the Subject Property would be in the best interest of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That SECTION TWO of Ordinance No. 3777 is hereby amended by deleting therefrom the following language "to construct a four (4) story office building with a maximum height of fifty- five feet (551) and a maximum gross floor area of one hundred sixty-five thousand (165,000) square feet" and substituting therefor the following: "...to, construct two 4 -story office buildings with a maximum height of fifty-five feet (551) and to provide a maximum gross floor area for both buildings to one hundred eighty thousand six hundred and sixty (180,660) square feet.." SECTION THREE: That Ordinance No. 3777 is hereby further amended by granting a side yard setback from Kensington Road of three hundred forty-five feet (3451), as shown on the Revised Site Plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1 1989. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields - Village Clerk Gerald L. -Farley Village President Village of Mount Prospect, Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT. ZBA-26.V-89, ZBA-32-SU-89, COURTYARD CONSTR. Co. LOCATION: 801 KENNICOTT PLACE, LOT 1 COURTS OF KENNICoTT DATE: JUNE 13, 1989 This applicat' "M was filed by Courtyard Construction for the following items: 1. A Special Use Permit for a three -car garage 2• A variation to allow the maximum size of a garage to be 730 feet instead of the 600 square feet required by the Zoning Ordinance, 3. A variation - Alol a driveway to be 40 feet instead of 21 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered this request at their meeting of June 8, 1989. Michael Schwartz presented testimony for Courtyard Construction, He explained that the buyer of this home would like a three -car garage, and that this is not unusual for a custom home. W Schwartz pointed out that a similar three -car garage was approved at 903 -load" garage, and as such, the wider garage requires a the proposed garage is a "side noted Kennicott, and that this has had no adverse impact on the area. Mr. Schwartz no d that driveway variation for adequate maneuvering. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the request. The Zoning Board found that the proposed three -car garage is not out of character with the area, and would not have an adverse impact on adjoining properties. 7Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of all requests with this application. DMC:hg I OCJt. A 4LftILA V 6N%_" I% MR, VE,5 QF r)IE NOR rW.A6 T OUARTER OF SECTION 15, TOWI 41 NCRTK RANGE 11 EAST OF THE Tmm ppINCVAL VIII IN COOK COUNTY, LUNCSS, ACT COMING TO THE PLAT THEREC LED IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTRAR ' ITLES OF COOK COUNTY, LLINOIS, ON OCTOM 30. ' 1987, AS OOCUmLj NO. LA -36621764. KNOWN AS 001 KENNK'—OT'T PLACE, NOTES 11 TOTAL AREA OF LOT- 4003% TOTAL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - 5,654 30 FT TOTAL LCT AREA ' t4,105 SID FT 21 TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA FRONT YARD - 19.9% DRIVE IN FRONT LAWN - SW go FT TOTAL FRONT YARD 2.650 go FT • 3300 CARE� I 20 Ism, 0. C. S. 4758 'o 10 CASLIM _E NT FOR f_k&IC UTILITIES 6 OPAL Gf— CONCRETE DRIVEWAY #001 068,30 XENNPCOTT PLACE "DIP", "ENN"'C"T a 3100 TOP OF FOUNDATION - 608 40 604 92 66 E'm I FINISHED TOPSOIL GRACE ADJACENT 70 FOUNDATION -68770 < 4,1 - 05 o," s F v 6 , 147 5 06 w, "'*—EASEMENT FOR PUBLIC UTILITIES III DRI ss MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 26-V-89, 32 -SU -89 Hearing Date: June 8, 1989 PETITIONER: Courtyard Construction Company PUBLICATION DATE: May 23, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: Lot #1, 801 Rennicott Place REQUEST: Special Use per Section 14.1101.0#6 to allow a three -car garage and variations from, Section 14,.102.B.4 to allow a 730 square Foot garage instead of the maximum 600 square feet allowed by Code, and from Section 14.116,#C to allow a maximum driveway width of 40 feet at one point instead of 21 Feet. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gil Basnik, Chairman Len Petrucelli (8:30 p.m.) Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: None ArlingtonMr. Mike Schwartz, �1655 North # #-•Arlington represented# mpany -in this case. The Company is presently building custom homes in t6 Courts of Subdivision on the southeast corner of Lonnquist average cost of $350,000. buyerseen the three -car garage on lot which had been approved last year. He WOUld like the identical garage on # Schwartz emphasized that all front yard setbacks and the total lot coverage • # e. Mr. Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, summarized that the request is for a three -car garage at 801 Kennicott. The side loaded garage for three cars necessitates the extra driveway width. It was noted that three -car garages are being seen more and more in new construction. No adverse impact is foreseen. Mr. Schwartz stated that the house in question is currently under contract. Marketing strategies have not been changed to encourage three -car garages. There are only four lots left to be sold in the subdivision. ZBA CASE 26-V-89, 3. SU -89 PAGE TWO Upon motion by Mi. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Lannon, it was moved to grant the variations from Section 14.102-8-4 to allow a 730 square foot garage instead of the maximum 600 square feet allowed by Code as shown in Petitioner's Exhibit #1 and from Section 14.116.0 to allow a maximum driveway width of 40 feet at one point instead of 21 feet as allowed by Code also as Shown on Petitioner's Exhibit *1. Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, OIMay Nayes: None By a vote of 4-0, the motion passed. Mr. Lannon, seconded by Ms. Brothers moved to grant a Special Use as per Section 14.1101-C.6 to allow a three -car garage instead of the normally allowed two -car, as shown in Petitioner's Exhibit *1. Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, O,may Nayes: None By a vote of 4-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary V111890 of Mount Prospect' Mount Pratt, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: GIL BASNIJr., ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER___� SUBJECT. ZBA-26-V-89, ZBA-32-SU-89, COURTYARD CONSTR. Co. LOCATION: 801 KENNICOTT PLACE, LOT I COURTS OF KENNICOTT DATE: MAY 31, 1989 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a special use to allow a three -car garage as per Section 14.1101.B.6 and variations to the following Sections: 1. Section 14.102.8.4 to allow the maximum size of a garage to be 730 square feet instead of 600 square feet as allowed by Code. 2. Section 14.116.0 to allow driveway flare of 40 feet in width instead of 21 feet maximum as ailow4td by Code. VILLAGE .9TAFr rnx4AArxPrg 'Mere were no comments or Objections received regarding this case. RL�NNINQ ANr -D ZWINfisaMMEM This lot is one of the twenty single family lots in the Courts of Kennicott Subdivision, It is located on the southeast corner of Lonnquist and Kennicott. The requests presented are very similar in nature to those approved for 903 Kennicott Place. The principal request is that of the special use for a three car garage. As you ire z re, it is no longer necessary to establish a hardship for a three car garage. However, tri. Special Use standards must be met. If a three car garage is granted by Special Use, a variation for the driveway width will be necessary. Since this is a side load garage, the extra -wide width of the driveway will be required as indicated on the site plan. The proposed 730 square foot size of the garage would not necessarily be required for a three car garage, therefore, the petitioner must justify the size, For your information, the impervious lot surface coverage is presently 38%. In summary, the petitioner must meet the standards set forth in the Special Use Section for the three car garage. If the three car garage is approved, it necessitates a wider than allowed drive, however, the size of the garage at 730 square feet must be justified, PB:hg aTqPDTTdde aagqo TTP ' — 'ON 90UPUTPIO Aq P9ZTaoq4nL> asn TPToadS 9q4 PUP 'UT92914 p9qUPJB SUOTqPTapA 91414 -iog qdgox*a T4 :mHE k5ijogs -(-OV) 4999 A4aO3 JO q4PTM APM9ATap e MOTTP 04 3*9TT*VT UOT408S Moaj UOTqPTIPA V oN 90UPUTP20 Aq P9ZTaoq4ne se la5vapb 2PO-C P 4TULlad o4 '8ZTS UT gaa3 axPnbs OCL 8bRaRb V mOTTP 04 V'G'ZOT:tT UOT4OaS MOIJ UOT4PTJPA V 'T :SUOT4eTlPA bUTmOTTOJ aT4-4 A4.iadoad 4oaCqng aiq4 o4 4upajB AqqjaT4 qoadsoad -4unoN 90 BbPTTTA aq4 go sea-4snaj gO PIPOS PUP 4u9PTs9ad aql TURT—R-oi-j—Das ,4oadsoad qunoW go 9bPTTTA 9q4 go saa4snal go papog Pup W9PTs9J6 aq4 Aq 4op3 go SbUTPUT; SP UTqjqq pia4leaod-iODUT 9-ip aAoqQUT9J9q q4ao; gas sTP-4T09-1 9741 :aNO —NOIJZ)aS :SIONIqIII '7,lNrIOD XOOD 'WadSOUd INnOW do aDVqIIA alll do SaHlSflHJ, 90 GHVOq GNV INaUISa*dd SHI A9 CaNIVUao ij aq 'aWaaUaHl 'MON uTaxag P9T3Toads SP SUOT4VTaPA elqq 4upab o4 8bvTTTA 9q4 go S4S9a94UT -4seq 9T4-4 UT aq PTnom '4T '4PT44 PUTJ -lal4'4-7n; saa-4snaLL go papog aT44 pup apoo abvTTTA 9TT4 go tT -ia4dp14:) 'jo IA aTOT4-IV JO 909 -TT UOT4OaS UT q4aO; 49S SPaPPU94S 8q4 S9T3ST4VS OMPS qiq4 -4Pq4 P9UTUL1949p 9APq PUP paqsanbai SUOT4VTaPA 944 04 UC;T-4Ra8PTsUO0 aaq4an3 uaA.Tb eAPq 9bPTTTA 9144 go saa4snaL go P-IPOS Pup '4u9PTsald a14-4 Pup -40aasoacj 4unow go 9bPTTTA 944 go soa4snzi 7o paeoq pup 4U9pTsaad ay44 04 uOT4vpUqmmO0qa pup sbUTPUTJ s4T P9'4'4Tmc,,'.s s*: -14 sTeaddV go pjeog bUTuOZ a14-4 SVaUaHM ---R PUP !686T 'AVW go AVP PaCZ aT44 UO PTvaaff-45-affsox a '4UnO 9144 UT P;alqSTTqnd 309.19XI4 90T:JOU a9doid pup anp 014 quensind '6862 launr go AeP T448 OL14 uo -4c;6dsoacl 4unox go 9bpTTTA 9tl'4 30 sTeaddy go paeog f)UTUOZ 9T4 OzO39q 68 -A -9Z 'ON aSP0 V12Z go qoalqns aq-4 bUT9q pa4sanbaa suo�T4RTaVA 9q4 uO PT94 SeM bUTaV9q OT .Tqnd e 'svauaHm *4993 TZ go mnUITXeM P944Tuuad aqq go Pe94SUT '489; ov go 144PTM AeM9ATIP mnUITXVM R mOTTe 04 3-9TT-tTs UOT40a z aaenbs 009 go mnMTXPUI P9-44TuLxad v44 go PP94SUT '915eaeb goo; aaenbs OCL P mOTTe 04 V*G'ZOT*VT UOT409S 'T :9POD 9bPTTTA a144 90 tT aaqdvqo go SUOT409S bUTMOTTO; 9144 UIOJJ SUOT-4PI T-TeA SX99S laUOT4T49d 914:4 'SVa-daHM !VqLcqqc-HU ON W9=000 SP L86T 'OC l9qO-400 UO STOUTTTI IA4unoo 31000 go SaT4T1 go aP24STbaa 9744 90 OOTJ;O 9tJ4 UT P9iT;';Oaa9l44 4eTd atI4 04 bUTPaODOR 'STOuiTTI IA4uno,,) Xo'oo UT 'uviPTJOR TvdTOUTad PaT141 at 'TT abueu li4,4-ioN Tv dTqsunoi 'GT*UOT-409S 0 ' 44 -40 4--e3 aa4jvn0 4svaqqaox atZ4 go JTPH 4sam alq4 go U6TSTATpqns V buTaq '4400TUUOX go s4,inoo UT T 40'1 paqTa0s9P ATTPb9T '(Aqa9doad 4oaCqnS SV 04 P9aI999Z aa4jVUT92: se 90PTd -4:400TUUaX Toe Se UMOU3( TuOuxmO0 Aqaado;td aoj 'S-EOUTTTI '4oadsoad qunoI4 go BPOD 9bPTTTA 9tJ4 go VT aa4dp14z) 90 UOTSTAoid 12 UIO-19 UOT-412TaPA e ;[Og UOT4PDTTdde up POTTJ svtl GIOUOT4T4ad se 04 Pqaaaja�;r x943VUT9a9q) AuudmO'0 UOT4ona4suoo PaPA4anoD ISVaHaHM 4— 0WId 4LLUOINNaX TOS SV -KMONX AUNOWWOO AlHadOUd Hod NOIIVIUVA V ONIINTdo aoNvNIGHo NV ON aONVNIGUO lavo ZBA 26-V-89 Page 2 of 2 Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SE ION FO -U -R: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein Shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPnOVFE this day of '1989. Gerald -E. Farley ATTEST: Village President Carol A. Fields Village Clerk CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 801...,KENNICOTT WHEREAS, Courtyard Construction Company (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property commonly known as 801 Kennicott (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: Lot 1 in Courts of Kennicott, being a subdivision of the West Half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 15, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois, according to the plat thereof filed in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois on October 30, 1987 as Document No. LR -3663764; and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use for the Subject Property, pursuant to Section 14.1101.C.6, to permit a 3 -car garage; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use (designated as ZBA Case No. 32 -SU -89) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 8th day of June, 1989, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 23rd day of May, 1989, and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendations in favor of the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have given further consideration to the requests herein and have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village and that the granting of the proposed Special Use would be in the best interest of the public. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant to the Subject Property a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage, which Special Use is granted in conjunction with the variations being the subject of Ordinance No. SECTION THREE: With the exception of the Special Use granted herein and the variations granted in Ordinance No. _, the Subject Property shall comply with all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations pertaining thereto. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ZBA 32 -SU -89 Page 2 of 2 from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1, 1989. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CREATING ARTICLE XX ENTITLED "HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, RESPONSES AND CLEAN-UP LIABILITIES" WHEREAS, incidents involving hazardous materials are increasing at a rapid rate in the chemically active region of Northern Illinois, and the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the handling of these types of incidents is outside the ordinary duties and responsibilities of Departments or Divisions of the Village such as the Fire Department, Police Department, and Public Works Department; and WHEREAS, the supplies and equipment used during hazardous materials responses are a continuously increasing expense for the Village; and WHEREAS, the supplies and protective equipment needed for hazardous materials responses are often specialized and very expensive and in some instances the materials must be replaced after only a few, or a single, incident, depending upon the amount of exposure or the nature of the material(s) involved; and WHEREAS, personnel over and above the normal staffing requirements are often needed to assist in the handling of a hazardous materials incident, including those required to man reserve equipment or to stand by for responses that may require emergency personnel in other areas of the Village; and WHEREAS, property and environmental decontamination and/or clean- up costs at hazardous materials incidents can cost millions of dollars in certain cases; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect may authorize its personnel to respond to neighboring communities through existing Mutual Aid Agreements and these communities may not have "Spiller pays" legislation for reimbursement of expenses incurred; and WHEREAS, neighboring communities do respond to the Village through existing Mutual Aid Agreements and are requesting reimbursement for their expenses incurred; and WHEREAS, with respect to the liability for reimbursement for a hazardous materials) incident the responsibilities may be assessed from, but not limited to the person or company in immediate control or possession of the hazardous material(s), the shipper, the transporter or agent, the consignee, the manufacturer, the distributor, and/or companies or contractors as third parties or those said to have caused the release of the material(s). NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Chapter 23 entitled "Offenses and Miscellaneous Regulations" of the Village Code of the Village of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new Article to be known as Article XX; so that hereinafter said Article XX of chapter 23 shall be and read as follows: ARTICLE XX HAZARDOUS MATERIALS REGULATIONS Sec. 23.2001. Spills Prohibited. It shall be unlawful, whether intentional or unintentional, for any person, firm or corporation release, emit, spill, or leak any material which constitutes a hazardous material incident. Sec. 23.2002. Definitions. For the purpose of this Article, the following words and terms shall have the following meanings: HAZARDOUS The leakage, release, seepage, or emission of MATERIAL(S) any substance or material which, due to its INCIDENT: quantity, form concentration, location or other characteristics, is determined by the Fire Chief or his authorized representative, based upon a reasonable degree of scientific certainty, to pose an unreasonable and inordinate risk to the life, health or safety of persons or property or to the ecological balance or the environment, including but not limited to, explosives, compressed gases, flammable and combustible liquids, flammable and water reactive solids, oxidizers and peroxides, Poisons, radioactive materials, corrosives or otherwise regulated materials, or any substance determined to be hazardous or toxic under any federal or state law, statute or regulation. EXPENSES TO All costs and expenses of the Village incurred THE VILLAGE: in the clean-up or abatement of hazardous materials or the extinguishing of a fire involving hazardous materials, and shall include but not limited ! o the follows: actual labor costs of Village tiersonnel involved in the clean-up or abatement of the discharge(i) including Worker's Compensation benefits, fringe benefit and administrative overhead or any other medical expenses; immediate or long term, of personnel exposed to the hazardous material, cost of equipment operation, damage or loss as published and updated by the Village; cost of materials ordered directly by the Village; the cost of any labor and material(s) expended through the retention of other parties to assist in clean-up or abatement and the repair of the property in the area of the incident. VILLAGE: Any Department or Division of the Village of Mount Prospect. Sec. 23.2002. Hazardous Material Responses - cost Reimbursement. Expense reimbursement to the Village: The person or companies in immediate control or possession of the hazardous material(s) at a hazardous materials incident, to which a Department or Division of the Village has responded, shall be responsible for reimbursement to the Village for all expenses incurred by the Village related to the response, the handling or the clean-up of the material(s). There shall be joint and several liability for reimbursement including but not limited to, the person(s) or companies in immediate control of the hazardous material(s), the shipper, the manufacturer, the distributor, the transporter of the material(s) involved, or third parties having caused or contributed to the cause of the release of the hazardous material(s). Sec. 23.2003. Fault Not To Be Considered. The person or company in immediate control or possession of the hazardous material at a hazardous materials incident shall be liable for any other costs, fees or expenses of whatever kind or nature which are incurred by the Village or its agent in the abatement, clean up or repair. The fault of the entity in immediate control or possession shall not be an issue in the attachment of this liability. For the purpose of this Article, repair shall mean, without exception, the return of the property to the condition that existed immediately prior to the incident. Sec. 23.2004. Distribution of Reimbursed costs - Replacement of Material(s) and/or other Expenses. The reimbursement funds may be used to replenish the supplies used by the Village at the scene of the hazardous material(s) incident. such supplies may include but shall not be limited to, protective clothing, absorbants, neutralizing chemicals, detection monitoring equipment, firefighting foams and chemicals, overtime personnel expenses, laboratory analysis, medical treatment, immediate and long term, of exposed or injured personnel, or equipment or supplies damaged or destroyed by exposure to the hazardous material(s) at the incident. Sec. 23.2005. Regulation or Remedies. Nothing in this Article XX shall be deemed to relieve any party from any other obligation or responsibilities that it might otherwise have under law to any other agency or party. Sec. 23.2006. Penalty. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any provision of this Article shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined not less than Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) nor :-ore than Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00) plus all costs and expenses involved in litigation for each offense. 11 SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after is passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk F 1989 aLLAGE OF MOUNT PROS—XT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W, FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: JUNE 14, 1989 SUBJECT: ZBA-32-A-89, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TEXT AMENDMENTS This application for text amendments applies primarily to off-street parking in the Central Business District. The following amendments are proposed: a.) Section 14.3004, Downtown District Non -Conforming - delete entire section; b.) Section 14.3007, Off -Site Remote Parking - to permit off-site parking by long- term lease; c.) Section 14.604 to establish an authorized variation for shared parking. The Zoning Board of Appeals considered these amendments at their meeting of June 8, 1989. At the meeting, Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, presented testimony in support of the application. Mr. Clements explained that off-street parking requirements should better address problems in the downtown area, and that the existing parking fund is not working out as originally intended. He stated that the parking fund actually can discourage new businesses, and that owners and merchants should be able to request a parking variation rather than a mandatory donation to the parking fund. The Zoning Board of Appeals reviewed this proposed amendment, and amendments to allow leased parking spaces downtown and a shared parking arrangement. The Zoning Board found that these amendments provided better administration of parking in the Central Business District, yet provided needed flexibility that meets the unique needs of the downtown area. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the following amendments: Section 14.604, Authorized Variations - Add the following language: To permit the same off-street parking spaces to qualify as required spaces for two or more uses, provided that the maximum use of each facility by each user does not take place during the same hours or on the same days of the week, John F. Dixon - Page 2 ZBA-32-A-89 June 14, 1989 2. Section 14.3004, Downtown District Non -Conforming - Delete entire Section. 3. Section 14.3007, Off -Site Remote parking Facilities - Delete entire Section and replace it with the following language: In cases where parking facilities are permitted on land other than the zoning lot on which the building or use served is located, such facilities shall be in the same possession as the zoning lot occupied by the building or use to which parking facilities are accessory. Such possession may either be by deed or long-term lease, the term of such lease to be approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals and filed with the Director of Planning and Zoning. The deed shall require such owner or heirs to maintain the required number of parking spaces for the duration of the use served or the term of the lease, whichever shall terminate sooner. It is recommended that the Zoning Board have final authority for these lease approvals. Also, leases for off-site parking should be limited to 1,000' of the use served in the CBD, and 500' from the use served outside the downtown. DMC:hg MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 32-A-89 Hearing Date: June 8, 1989 PETITIONER: Village of Mount Prospect PUBLICATION DATE: May 23, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: Zoning Ordinance Amendment REQUEST: Amend Section 14.604, Authorized Variations, add language (see text). Amend Section 14.3004, Downtown District Non -Conforming, Delete in its entirety. Amend Section 14.3007, Off -Site Remote Parking Facilities, Delete in its entirety and add language, (see text). ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gil Basnik, Chairman Len Petrucelli (8:30 p.m.) Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: Jerry Pospisil Angelo Theotokatos Rudy Pikula Marie Winkelman Mr. Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning for the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that several amendments are being requested to the Zoning Ordinance under Section 30 -Parking. Administration of current parking requirements for the Central Business District is very difficult. Standards require a certain number of spaces per square foot of floor area and must be applied ir, a., ..nge of use. Parking problems exist, however, there is no land ava_-�able to provide the required parking. The downtown area problem is somewhat recognized where businesses contribute to a parking fund in lieu of having required parking spaces. The contribution is $1800 per space and in 10 years, the total in the fund is $5500. Small businesses find the contribution excessive. This fund actually works against change of use in the Central Business District and may be contributing to longer vacancies in some cases. The fund is determined to be mandatory and no variations to parking requirements can be requested as is done outside the Central Business District. Review on a case by case basis seems a reasonable request. ZBA CASE 32-A-89 Page Two Mr. Clements noted that Off -Site Parking is also recommended for amendment. Businesses can provide off-site parking, if the land for the parking is owned by said business. Staff believes that more flexibility can be provided if long-term leases can be instituted, determined by the Zoning, Board. Mr. Clements also reviewed shared parking stating that an authorized variation could be created to share parking between two or more uses, provided that the maximum use of each facility does not take place during the same hours or days of the week. An example of a theatre and retail center sharing parking was given, if the theatre is primarily open evenings when most stores are closed. Mr. Jerry Pospisil, Kiefer Pharmacy, stated that there is a parking problem in the downtown. The Village does have a ;lot where spaces can be leased at a reasonable rate. Even if made available entirely for customers, it would not be enough. It is an inconvenience to park a block away. Mr. Angelo Theotokatos, Sam's Place, stated that there is no space available for parking. A lot is available, but customers cannot park there because owners and employees use it. Mr. Rudy Pikula, MaryJane"s, agreed that people do not care to walk an extra block when carrying packages. They just go somewhere else. Commuter parking on the street all day is a problem. Marie Winkelman, Koenig Realtors, stated that she also has a parking problem. 16 agents are employed and there is a problem is more than 4 are in the office at onetime. Mr. Clements cited that these amendments are more the administration of the Parking Ordinances Arnold's Restaurant was used as an example when it went from a sit-down restaurant to a food service at the counter. By Ordinance, it is now defined as fast-food, intensified use and more parking is required. While the owner was trying to cut costs, the village required him to now contribute to the parking fund. Another example was given when a yogurt store made inquiries into moving into the downtown. They were told they had to contribute to the parking fund and were scared off. If small businesses could come before the Board for a parking variation, maybe the downtown would be more attractive to other uses. It was noted that some suburban municipalities have no parking restrictions in their downtowns. Upon question by Mr. Lannon, it was noted that these amendments were presented to the Downtown Redevelopment Commission, who endorsed and approved them. Suggestions ,from the audience included not eliminating all parking' restrictions, since it would penalize businesses, eliminating commuter parking and eliminating the median strip to allow diagonal parking on both sides of street. ZBA CASE 32-A-89 Page Three Upon motion by Ms. O'May, and seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved to amend the Zoning Ordinance as follows: 1) Section 14.604, Authorized Variations - Add the following language: To permit the same off-street parking spaces to qualify as required spaces for two or more uses, provided that the maximum use of each facility by each user does not take place during the same hours or on the same days of the week; 2) Section 14-3004, Downtown District Non -Conforming - Delete entire Section; 3) Section 14.3007, Off -Site Remote Parking Facilities - Delete entire Section and replace it with the following language: In cases where parking facilities are permitted on land other than the zoning lot on which the building or use served is located, such facilities shall be in the same possession as the zoning lot -occupied by the building or use to which parking facilities are accessory. Such possession may either be by deed or long-term lease, the term of such lease to be approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals and filed with the Director of Planning and Zoning. The deed shall require such owner or heirs to maintain the required number of parking spaces for the duration of the use served or the term of the lease, whichever shall terminate sooner. Upon roll call: Ayes: Petrucelli, Lannon, Brothers, Cassidy, O'May Nayes: None By a vote of 5-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN M FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-32-A-89, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TEXT AMENDMENTS DATE: MAY 31, 1989 REQUEST This request is for amendments to Section 6, Authorized Variation, and Section 30, Off - Street Parking, particularly as it applies to off-street parking in the Central Business District. The following amendment are proposed: a.) Section 14.3004, Downtown District Non -Conforming - delete entire section; b.) Section -4.3W". Off -Site Remote Parking - to permit off-site parking by long- term lease; c.) Section 14.604 to establish an authorized variation for shared parking. r All departments have reviewed the proposed amendments. No comments were received. s The staff points out that administering the current parking requirements for the Central Business District is very difficult. Parking standards require a certain number of spaces per square foot of floor area, and this standard must be applied for every new or changed use in downtown Mount Prospect. As you know, there is insufficient off-street parking in the CBD. Applying our parking requirements to the non -conforming parking of most buildings downtown is not reasonable, as there is no land available to provide the parking that is requirzd. The zoning text recognizes this non -conforming parking situation somewhat in Section 14.3004, Downtown District Non -Conforming by stating "in the Downtown District, where existing floor space is intensified and cannot conform to the parking requirements, the owner may request to donate to the Villages parking fund....." Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA-32-A-89 May 31, 1989 The theory behind the parking fund is good in that it offers an alternative to providing required parking, with the funds to be used at some point in the future to construct a parking lot. Presently, the contribution is $1,800 per space. In the approximate 10 years since the parking fund was established, its balance is only $5,500. In practice, property owners and small businesses find the $1,800 contribution per space to be excessive . In many cases, contributions exceeding $5,000 would have to be made to the fund to allow occupancies in small storefronts with no available off-street parking. The parking fund requirement actually works against changes of uses in the CBD, and may be contributing to longer vacancies in some cases. Further, the parking fund has been interpreted as a requirement for non -conforming parking. This means a property owner cannot request a parking variation or have an opportunity to explain the impact of an intensification of use on existing parking. A parking variation can be requested outside the CBD, and it seems reasonable to permit variations in the downtown area under proper circumstances. Also, the Zoning Ordinance permits off-site parking if such parking is under the same ownership as the property requiring the off-site parking. In this way, required parking can be provided in remote locations if it cannot be provided on-site. This is a good alternative for required parking, but staff believes that off-site parking should also be allowed by long- term lease, not just by ownership of a parcel for parking. Such a lease arrangement, approved by the Zoning Board, would allow more flexibility in meeting parking requirements, and would more reasonably work in the CBD, Additionally, the staff recommends that an authorized variation be created to allow shared parking. In this way, off-street parking could qualify as required spaces for two or more uses, provided that the maximum use of each facility does not take place during the same hours or days of the week. For example, a theatre might be able to share parking with a retail center, if the theatre is primarily open evenings when most stores in the retail center were closed. Lastly, the staff notes that these parking amendments are used successfully in other municipalities, and that they provide sufficient control of parking while allowing more flexibility for parking requirements in the CBD. The staff recommends the following amendments: Section 14.604, Authorized Variations - Add the following language: To permit the same off-street parking spaces to qualify as required spaces for two or more uses, provided that the maximum use of each facility by each user does not take place during the same hours or on the same days of the week. Gil Basnik - Page 3 ZBA-32-A-89 May 31, 1989 2. Section 14.3004, Downtown District Non -Conforming - Delete entire Section. 3. Section 14.3007, Off -Site Remote parking Facilities - Delete entire Section and replace it with the following language: In cases where parking facilities are permitted on land other than the zoning lot on which the building or use served is located, such facilities shall be in the same possession as the zoning lot occupied by the building or use to which parking facilities are accessory. Such possession may either be by deed or long-term lease, the term of such lease to be approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals and filed with the Director of Planning and Zoning. The deed shall require such owner or heirs to maintain the required number of parking spaces for the duration of the use served or the term of the lease, whichever shall terminate sooner. It is recommended that the Zoning Board have final authority for these lease approvals. Also, leases for off-site parking should be limited to 1,000' of the use served in the CBD, and 500' from the use served outside the downtown. DMC:hg ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, through its administration, (hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner"), has filed an application for text amendments to Section 14.604 entitled "Authorized variations", Section 14.3004 entitled "Downtown District Non - Conforming" and Section 14.3007 entitled "Off-site Remote Parking Facilities" of Chapter 14; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for a text amendments (designated as ZBA Case No. 32-A-89) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 8th day of June, 1989, pursuant to due and proper legal notice thereof published in the Mount Prosipect Herald on the 23rd day of May, 1989; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted Its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered the text amendment requested and find that it would be in the best interest of the village to grant the request being the subject of ZBA 32-A-89. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That Section 14.604.A entitled "Authorized Variations" of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto a new sub -paragraph A.11; so that hereinafter said Section 14.604.A shall include the following: of 11. To permit the same off-street parking spaces to qualify as required spaces for two or more uses, provided that the maximum use of each facility by each user does not take place during the same hours or ont he same days of the week. 11 SECTION THREE: That Section 14.3004 entitled "Downtown District Non -Conforming" of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting the text in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Section 14.3004 shall be and read as follows: of Sec. 14.3004. Reserved. SECTION FOUR: That Section 14.3007 entitled "Off -Site Remote Parking Facilities" of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting Section 14.3007 in its entirety and substituting therefor the following; so that hereinafter said Section 14.3007 shall be and read as follows: of Sec. 14.3007. In cases where parking facilities are permitted on land other than the zoning lot on which the building or use served is located, such facilities shall be in the same possession as the zoning lot occupied by the building or use to which parking facilities are accessory. Such possession 0 ZBA 32-A-89 Page 2 of 2 may either be by deed or long-term lease, the term of such lease is subject to the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals and filed with the Director of Planning and Zoning. The deed for the off -site parking shall require such owner or heirs to maintain the required number of parking spaces for the duration of the use served or the term of the lease, whichever shall terminate sooner. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall have final authority for these lease or deed approvals. Also, leases for off -site parking should be limited to one no more than thousand feet (1, 000 feet) of the use served in the Central Business District, and no more than five hundred feet (5001) from the use served outside the Central Business District. 11 UCTION FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Schedule B. of Section 18.2004 entitled "Yield Signs" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended to include in proper alphabetical sequence III -Oka North & Southbound Sha Bonee Trail"; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2004.E shall include the following: it Name of Direction of Street Traffic Movement At Intersection With I -Oka Ave. North & southbound Sha Bonee Trail It SECTION TWO: That schedule B. of Section 18.2004 entitled "Yield Signs" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended be deleting therefrom "Emerson St. North and Southbound Henry St." . SECTION THREE. That Section 18.2004.A entitled "Schedule IV.A Stop and Yield Signs" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence the following; so that hereinafter said Schedule IV.A shall include the following: to Name of Street Boxwood Dr.N Boxwood Dr.S Dogwood Ln. Emerson St. Henry St. Direction of Traffic Movement Eastbound Eastbound Eastbound North & southbound East and Westbound At 'Intersection With Wheeling Rd. Wheeling Rd. Wheeling Road Henry St. Henry St. 61 SECTION_ FOUR: That Section 18.2005 entitled "Schedule V - No Stopping, Standing or Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence the following; so that hereinafter said Schedule V shall include the following: it Name of Side of Between Street Street Hours of Boxwood Dr.S North At Any Time Boxwood Dr. East At Any Time Boxwood Dr. East At Any Time Dogwood Ln. South At Any Time 0 The first 20 feet west of Wheeling Rd. The first 20 feet south of Dogwood In. The first 20 feet north of Dogwood Ln. The first 20 feet east of Boxwood Dr. Chapter 18 Page 2 of 2 Name of Side of Between Street Street Hours of Description Dogwood Ln. South At Any Time The first 20 feet west of Wheeling Rd. Wheeling Rd. West At Any Time The first 20 feet north of Boxwood Dr.N Wheeling Rd. West At Any Time The first 20 feet Wheeling Rd. West At Any Time south of Boxwood Dr.N The first 20 feet north of Dogwood Ln. Wheeling Rd. West At Any Time The first 20 feet Wheeling Road West At Any Time south of Dogwood Ln. The first 20 feet north of Boxwood Dr.S Wheeling Road West At Any Time The first 20 feet south of Boxwood Dr.S SECTION FIVE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form the manner provide by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President /caf ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XII ENTITLED "FAIR HOUSING" OF CHAPTER 23 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Article XII entitled "Fair Housing" of Chapter 23 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect is hereby amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Article XII of Chapter 23 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be and read as follows: 11 ARTICLE XII FAIR HOUSING SECTION: 23.1201 Declaration of Policy 23.1202 Definitions 23.1203 Discriminatory Actions by Brokers 23.1204 Discriminatory Actions by Owners, Lessors and DISCRIMINATE: Lending Institutions 23.1205 Exemptions 23,1206 Penalty 23.1207 Administration and Enforcement 23.1289 Processing of Complaints 23.1209 Commission Report Section 23.1201. Declaration of Policy. It is hereby declared to be the policy of the Village of Mount Prospect, for the purpose of providing for the health, morals, safety and welfare of the persons in and residing in the Village and for the maintenance and promotion of commerce, industry and good government in Mount Pr,).spec,, that all persons living and/or working or desiring to live in Mount Prospect shall have a fair opportunity to purchase, lease, rent or occupy real estate without discrimination based upon race, color, religion, creed, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, marital status, or mental or physical handicap. This policy is intended to protect the interest of buyers and sellers, lessors and lessees, landlords and tenants, and the entire community as a whole in accordance with the provisions of this Article. Section 23.1202. Definitions. As used in this Article, the following terms and phrases shall have the following respective meaning: COMMISSION: The Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect. CORPORATE AUTHORITIES: The Mayor and Board of Trustees• of the Village of Mount Prospect. DISCRIMINATE: Any difference in terms, conditions or treatment in the sale, lease or financing of real estate because of race, color, creed, sex, ancestry, marital status, age, physical or mental handicap, religion, national origin DISCRIMINATION: The action(s) used to discriminate. DWELLING: A dwelling is a building, or portion thereof designed or used exclusively for residential occupancy inclu- ding single-family dwellings, two-family dwellings and multiple -family dwellings, but not including hotels, motels, rooming, boarding or lodging houses. OFFER: Every attempt by means of written or oral com- munication: to present for acceptance or rejection; to hold out or offer; to make a proposal to, or to exhibit; real estate that may be taken or received with the intention of ultimately entering into a real estate transaction. OWNER: Any person, or legal entity, who holds legal or equitable title to any dwelling. PERSON IN THE BUSINESS Any person who: OF SELLING OR RENTING DWELLINGS: A- Has, within the preceding twelve (12) months, participated as principal in three (3) or more transactions involving the sale or rental of any dwelling or any interest therein, or B. Has, within the preceding twelve (12) months, participated as agent, other than in the sale of his own personal residence, in providing sales or rental facilities or sale or rental services in two (2) or more transactions involving the sale or rental of any dwelling or any interest therein, or C. Is the owner of any dwelling designated or intended for occupancy by someone other than the owner. PUBLIC OFFER: Any written or oral offer or proposal to enter into IAND VARIATIONS OF SAID a real estate transaction which: TERM) A. Is made by means of a sign or other written notice which is posted on the real estate upon which the dwelling being offered is located or is visible from any public property or right-of-way; or B. Is made by means of any advertisement publi- shed in any newspaper of other periodicals having general circulation within the Village; or C. Is made by or by means of a real estate broker pursuant to or in connection with any written agreement between such real estate broker and the owner of lessee of such dwelling, or any agent thereof. REAL ESTATE BROKER: Any person who customarily, as a business and for consideration, on behalf of himself or others sells or offers for sale, or buys or offers to buy or negotiates the purchase or sale or exchange of real property, including dwellings, or leases or rents, or offers to lease or rent real property, or who negotiates the lease or rental thereof or who employs any person to act as a real estate salesman to perform any one or more of the foregoing acts. REAL ESTATE SALESMAN: Any person licensed or required to be licensed as a real estate salesman in accordance with the provi- sions of Chapter 114 1/2 of the Illinois Revised Statutes, or any act or acts supplementing, amending or superseding said provisions. -2- REAL ESTATE TRANSACTION: The purchase, sale, exchange, lease or rental of any dwelling, and any legally enforceable option or contract to do any of the foregoing. VILLAGE: The Village of Mount Prospect, an Illinois muni- cipal corporation. (Ord. 2130, 1-7-69) Section 23.1203. Discriminatory Actions by Real Estate Brokers and Salesmen. It shall be unlawful for any real estate broker or real estate salesman: A. To fail or refuse, within a reasonable time after request, to furnish to any party to a real estate transaction a copy of any document signed by such party and in the possession of such broker or salesman. B. To fail or refuse, upon request, to permit any person to examine copies of any listing or descriptive materials respecting any dwelling which has been publicly offered for sale, lease or rental, because of the race, color, creed, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, mental or physical handicap, religion or national origin of such person. C. It shall be unlawful for any real estate broker to employ or continue to employ any real estate salesman found to have violated the provisions of this Article and Section of this Code, more than twice in any period of six (6) consecutive months, unless such finding or findings shall not be sustained upon further proceedings, if any, pursuant to the provisions of this Article. D. To publish, circulate, issue or display or cause to be published, circulated, issued or displayed, any communication, notice, advertisement, sign or other writing of any kind relating to the sale, rental or leasing of any real estate which will indicate or express any discrimination. E. To exploit or overcharge any person for a real estate transaction and/or offer because of race, color, creed, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, mental or physical handicap, or national origin of such person. F. To discriminate or participate in discrimination in connection with borrowing or lending money, guaranteeing loans, accepting mortgages or otherwise obtaining or making available funds for the purchase, acquisition, rehabilitation, repairs or maintenance of any real property in the Village. G. To solicit for sale or lease, or for listing for sale or lease, any real estate on the ground of loss of value due to the present or prospective entry into any neighbor- hood of any person or persons of any particular race, color, creed, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, mental or physical handicap, or national origin of such person. H. To influence or attempt to influence by words or acts the choice or location of housing of a prospective purchaser, occupant, or tenant, in connection with viewing, buying, leasing, or occupying real estate based on race, color religion, creed, ancestry, national origin, age, sex, martial status, or mental or physical handicap so as to promote or maintain segregation. Section 23.1204. Discriminatory Actions by Owners, Lessors and Lending Institutions. It shall be unlawful for any owner, lessor or lending institution: A. To discriminate in selling a dwelling which is being publicly offered for sale or in leasing or renting a dwelling which is then being publicly offered for lease or rent, to a person who is ready, willing and able to purchase, lease or rent the same, as the case may be, and who has made or who tenders a bona fide offer therefore which is at least as favorable to such owner or lessor as the terms on which such dwelling is then publicly offered, or to fail or refuse to negotiate in good faith with any such person for such sales, lease or rental, but only in each case if such failure or refusal is because of the race, color, creed, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, mental or physical handicap, religion or national origin of such person; or B. To discriminate in entering into a listing agreement which prohibits the sale or rental of real estate to any person; or C. To discriminate in lending money or extending credit to any person or to refuse to negotiate with such person with respect to any such loan or extension of credit; or D. To perform any of the unlawful acts applicable to owners, lessors and lending institutions set out in this Article. Section 23.1205. Exemptions. The following real estate transactions shall be exempt from all provisions of this Article: A. Any real estate transaction not involving the public offering of a dwelling for sale, lease or rental. B. Nothing in this Article shall require a real estate broker or owner to offer real property for sale or lease or to show real property to any person if such person is not negotiating for the purchase or lease of such real property in good faith. Section 23.1206. Penalty. Any person found guilty of violating any provision of this Article shall be guilty of committing a misdemeanor and shall be punished by a fine of not less than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) nor more than five thousand dollars ($5,000.00) for each such violation. Section 23.1207. Administration and Enforcement - Plan Commission. A majority of Commissioners then holding office shall constitute a quorum for the purpose of transacting any Commission business or any decision by the Commission under this Chapter. The Commission shall have and exercise, with respect to all real property and with respect to all persons subject to the Chapter, the following powers and responsi- bilities: a. To act to eliminate unlawful real estate practices; b. To act to assure to persons living, working or desiring to live in Mount Prospect, or in any particular real property, opportunity to purchase, lease or occupy without discrimination because of race, color, creed, ancestry, age, sex, marital status, mental or physical handicap, or national origin of such person; C. To hold hearings on, and make findings of fact with respect to any such complaint; -4- d. To recommend the issuance of orders and other appropriate enforcement procedures, subject to approval by the corporate authorities, and to publish its findings of fact to the corporate authorities; e. To submit from time to time, but not less often than annually, a written report to the corporate authorities of the general scope of the Commission's activities and recommendations with respect to fair real estate practices, which written report shall be made public after its submission; such annual report shall be submitted by May 1st of each year, to cover the prior calendar year; f. To create from time to time ad hoc committee(s) consisting of Commissioners to expedite and facilitate the work 'of the Commission in respect to the Commission's fair housing responsibilities. 9. To take such action, and to make such recommendations to the corporate authorities as may be necessary or desirable to fulfill and implement the foregoing powers and responsibilities. Section 23.1208. Processing of Complaints. Any person aggrieved in any manner by any violation of any provision of this Article may file with the Village Manager's office a written verified complaint setting forth his grievance within thirty (30) days of the date of the alleged violation. The complaint shall state the name and address of the complainant; the name and address of the person against whom the complaint is brought, if known to the complainativ facts sufficient to allege a violation of this Article; the names and addresses c i: p, , )ns believed to have knowledge concerning the alleged facts; and such other relevant information as the Commission may deem desirable. The Commission shall provide a printed form of complaint for the use of aggrieved persons. After the filing of any complaint, a Village Manager official shall serve a copy of the complaint on the party or parties charged by registered mail. If the Village Manager official determines, after prompt and appropriate investi- gation, that probable cause exists for the allegations of the complaint, the Village Manager shall set a time and date for a meeting of the complainant and the person or persons against whom the complaint has been directed. The Village Manager's office shall attempt to resolve the complaint by all proper methods of conciliation and persuasion and shall inform the Commission of such conciliation. If the Village Manager's office determines that further attempts at conciliation would not be in furtherance of the objectives of this Chapter, the Commission shall thereupon proceed promptly to a full hearing by the Commission of the complaint as hereinafter provided. If the Village Manager's office determines, after the review of the complaint and facts, that the complaint should be dismissed, the Village Manager's office shall so advise the Commission. If the Commission shall concur with the Village Manager's office, after having reviewed the facts on the complaint, the complaint shall be dismissed. Otherwise, the complaint shall be set for hearing by the Commission as hereinafter provided. The Village Manager official shall reach its determination within sixty (60) days after the date of filing of the complaint. The Commission shall reach its conclusions within ninety (90) days after the date of filing of the complaint or within a longer period of time if said hearing date is continued by the Commission. -5- Hearings provided for in the provisions of this article shall be conducted by the Commission, upon fifteen (15) day notice to all parties. The Commission shall have power to administer oaths. Any party alleged to have violated this Chapter shall be entitled to be represented by counsel and shall have the right to call witnesses on his own behalf and to cross-examine witnesses. Section 23.1209. Commission Report. At the conclusion of a hearing, hereunder, the Commission shall render to the Village Board a written report with recommendations, copies of which shall be served by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, upon the complainant and the party or parties charged. Such report shall be made within thirty (30) days after the end of the hearing. In its report, the Commission may recommend one or more of the following: That the corporate authorities: 1. Order any person found to be engaging in an unfair real estate practice to cease and desist from such practice, upon such terms as shall be necessary and proper for the enforcement of this Chapter; 2. Institute and prosecute proceedings to enforce, against any person found in violation of this Chapter, the fine provided for herein. 3. Apply to any court of competent jurisdiction of an order restraining any person from violating any provision of this Chapter and for such other or further relief as may seem to the court appropriate. 4Petition or institute proceedings with the Illinois Department of Registration and Education for the purpose of causing the department to revoke, suspend or refuse to renew the license granted by such department to any real estate broker or real estate salesman found to have violated any provision of this Chapter. 5. In the case of any unlawful real estate practice or violation of this Chapter by any person in the course of performing under a contract or subcontract with the state or any political subdivision or agency thereof, or with the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof, petition or institute proceedings with such contracting agency for the purpose of causing it to terminate such contract or any portion thereof, either absolutely or on condition of compliance with the provisions of this Chapter. Any person aggrieved in any manner by the violation of any provision of this Chapter who has exhausted the remedies otherwise provided for in this Chapter may apply to any court of competent jurisdiction for appropriate relief from such violation, including: a. An order compelling compliance with this Chapter. b. An order prohibiting any such person found by the court to have violated any provision of this Chapter from the sale, lease, exchange, transfer, conveyance or assignment of the real property in question, C. Compensatory damages. d. Such other and further relief as may seem appropriate to the court for the enforcement of this Chapter and the elimination of violations hereof. 11 -6- SECTION TWO; That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1 1989. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President - 7 - Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Dixon, Village Manager FROM: Paul Bednar, Planne r DATE: June 28, 1989 SUBJECT: ZBA-36-V-89, Carl and Sheila Thomas, 405 North Pine Street The applicants are requesting variations to the Zoning Code in order to allow a 1-1/2' instead of 10' separation between a detached garage and the home and also a 3-1/2' setback from the garage to the side lot line instead of 5' as required by Code. This case was presented to the Zoning Board on June 22. Mr. 'nomas explained to the Board members that he would like to replace the existing one -car garage with a tandem style two - car garage set back from the home at the present distance. He could comply with code by building a normal two -car garage in back of his home, however, he explained that this would entail an additional 50' of asphalt driveway and would also eliminate a good portion of his back yard. The staff noted that because of the narrow width of this property, a tandem style two -car garage is one option. They also pointed out that if the Code was met with a two -car garage, it may exceed the impervious lot surface coverage by covering a large amount of the rear yard. Staff also clarified to the Board that the actual structure of the house is 6-1/2 feet away from the proposed corner of the garage. However, there are concrete steps leading into the house that are 1-1/2' away. It is for this reason that a 1-1/2' variation is required. The neighbor most affected by the proposal, at 403 North Pine, stated he had no objections to the proposed plan; in fact, welcomes the improvement. The Zoning Board then recommended the approval of both variation requests. Both requests were approved unanimously 7-0. No objectors or other neighbors were present to voice concerns regarding this case. PB:c1 Approved: David M. Clements, Director MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 36-V-89 Hearing Date: June 22, 1989 PETITIONER: Carl and Sheila Thomas PUBLICATION DATE: June 6, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 405 North Pine Street REQUEST: variation from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 11511 distance between a detached garage and the principal structure instead of 10 feet as required by Code. Also a variation from Section 14.102.8.2 to allow a 3'5" setback from the interior side lot line to the detached garage instead of 5 feet required by Code. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: Gil Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Len Petrucelli Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May None Chuck Bennett Mr. Carl Thomas, Petitioner, presented his proposal for a new two -car tandem garage to replace the existing one -car garage. The garage will be extended 141 to the rear of the property in order to park two cars in tandem. In order to Comply with Code and build a normal two -car garage would entail an additional 50 feet of drive and would also eliminate a good portion of the back yard. Mr. Chuck Bennett, 403 North Pine, stated tha -as the Petitioner's most affected neighbor, he had no objections to the proposed plan, in fact, it would be an improvement to what currently exists. Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, indicated that the Petitioner's home is located in a single family neighborhood with similar houses and garages. The new garage is proposed to be placed in the same location as the current garage. The house is, at its closest point 6' feet away from the garage, however, there are concrete steps that lead into the house located only 1' feet away from the corner of the garage. The 1�1 variation request is for this reason. Mr. Bednar noted the option of locating a regular two -car ZBA CASE 36-V-$9 Page Two garage in the rear yard according. to Code, but highlighted the additional asphalt expense and additional lot surface coverage. The tandem garage was viewed as a reasonable option, and no negative impact is anticipated. Upon motion by Ms. O'May, seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved to grant a variation from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 115" distance between a detached garage andtheprincipal structure instead of 10 feet as required by Code and to grant a variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 3151, setback from the interior side lot line to the detached garage instead of 5 feet required by Code. All as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1. Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy Brettrager, O'May, Basnik Nayes None By a vote of 7-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary "ALLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPkZ`T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLAN NEIr-- SUBJECT: ZBA-36-V-89, CARL AND SHEILA THOMAS LOCATION: 405 NORTH PINE STREET DATE: JUNE 15, 1989 REQUEST The applicants are requesting variations from: 1. Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a 1.5' separation between a detached garage and steps into the house. Code normally required a 10 foot separation between a detached garage and a principal structure; and 2. Section 14.102.13.2 to allow a 3.5 foot side yard setback from the detached garage to the property line instead of 5 feet as required by Code. ULL&GE. STAFF COMMENTS The Inspection Services Department notes that the existing drainage pattern along the property line must not he altered. Since the proposed garage will be less than 10 feet from the house structure, the garage must have 5/8" Class X drywall installed. Building permits will be required prior to any construction. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS This home is a two-story brick Georgian located on a block of similar homes. Approximately one-half of the residents that live on this block have one car garages whereas the other half have detached two -car garages located in the rear yard. Mr. & Mrs. Thomas have an existing detached one -car frame garage located in the same location as the proposed new garage. The neighbor to the south also has a detached one -car garage located less than one foot from the property line. The applicants are proposing to remove the one -car garage and replace it with a two -car tandem style garage located the same distances from the lot line and the house as the existing garage is. Although the closest point of the garage to the house is 6 1/2 feet, there are concrete steps that lead into the house located only 1 1/2 foot away from the corner of the garage. It is for this reason that a variation for a 1 1/2 foot setback from the principal structure to the garage is required. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA-36-V49 June 15, 1989 The proposed tandem style garage makes sense on a narrow width lot such as this one. However, there does remain the other option of locating a regular two -car garage in the rear yard and still maintain setbacks from the house and the property line. This option would take up more of the rear yard space and would result in more lot surface coverage because of the extra length of asphalt driveway. There also is the option of moving the proposed two -car tandem garage further back from the house to have a greater separation from the concrete steps to the comer of the garage. This could be accomplished without disturbing any landscaping in the rear. In summary, Mr. & Mrs. Thomas have a narrow width lot which makes it difficult to locate a two -car garage on their property. The tandem style garage, as proposed, is reasonable in our opinion, yet it requires setback variations. A normal two -car garage in the rear yard could be built to meet all setbacks, yet it would require more lot surface coverage. We do not expect a significant impact on this neighborhood as a result of the variation. ME 407 V. P -o I Yvi SITE rj -56.6- 91 Village of Mount Prospect' Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John Dixon, Village Manager FROM: Paul Bednar, Plamv"___�� DATE: June 28, 1989 SUBJECT: ZBA-38-SU-89, George T. Reilly, 308 Eric Court The applicant is requesting a special use permit in order to install one satellite antennae at the rear of his house approximately 11' in height and 10' in width. This case was reviewed by the Zoning Board of Appeals on June 22, 1989. Mr. Reilly, the petitioner, stated that he has a satellite dish from his previous residence and would like to install it to the rear of his new home in the Harvest Heights Subdivision. He is willing to meet all standards required under the special use permit. The staff pointed out to the Board that this residential lot- is located at the end of a cul- de-sac in the new Harvest Heights Subdivision and backs up to the Opus Business Park. There are single-family homes on the three remaining sides. The dish is to be located at the northeast corner of the lot which would be out of view from most surrounding properties. It was also noted by staff that the Village has only processed three other satellite dish requests in previous years, with two of those being withdrawn prior to Board action. Mr. Reilly presented letters from his neighbors as evidence of support. Some discussion ensued among the Board members regarding moving the antennae more toward the center of the lot in order to have it less visible from the street. However, after hearing a neighbor testify that the proposed location is better to hide it, the Board agreed. The Board then voted to approve this request by a unanimous 7-0 vote. One neighbor was present to voice his concerns, however, no objections were brought forth. PB:c1 Approved: David A Clements, Director R MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE 38 -SU -89 Hearing Date; June 22, 1989 PETITIONER: George T. Reilly PUBLICATION DATE: June 6, 1989 SUBJECT PROPERTY: 308 Eric Court REQUEST: Special Use per Section 14.1101-C.5 to install one satellite antenna at the rear of the house of approximately 11 feet in height and 10 feet in width. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED: Gil Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Len Petrucelli Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May None Bill Walters Mr. George Reilly, 308 Eric Court, Petitioner, stated that he would like to install an antenna which would receive satellite signals in his backyard. It was noted that the dish would not work properly without being over 401, in diameter. Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, stated that the Petitioner requires a Special Use permit since the satellite antenna is over 401, in diameter. All standards for a satellite dish in a residential district must be met. The height is 11' and the diameter is 101 and it will be located 30 feet from the rear of the house outside of any easements. Mr. Reilly's home backs up to the Opus Business Park and is surrounded by single family homes on the three remaining sides. The most affected neighbor is at 308 Eric Court and the Opus Park users. The dish is to be located in the northeast corner of the lot and therefore, fairly easy to screen with landscaping from the street and adjacent properties. It was suggested that the motion incorporate landscaping requirements. Only three other satellite dish requests have been recorded in the Village, with two being withdrawn prior to Board action. ZBA CASE 38 -SU -89 Page Two Mr. Reilly stated that he has signatures of his neighbors, none of which are objecting to the installation. He also stated that he would comply with landscaping requirements. Discussion ensued regarding moving the antenna more towards the center of the lot in order to have it less visible from the street. Mr. Bill Walters, 209 Neal, stated that moving it more towards the center of the lot would make the antenna more noticeable from both Neil and Eric and would prefer that it remain in the proposed location. Mr. Reilly noted that there is no interference from the satellite dish since it can only receive and not send. Upon motion by Mr. Brettrager, and seconded by Ms. O'May, it was moved to grant the Special Use per Section 14.1101.0.5 to install one satellite antenna at the rear of the house of approximately 11 feet in height and 10 feet in width as shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1, subject to the Petitioner agreeing to cooperate with Village staff to provide landscaping to lessen the impact on the neighborhood. Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May, Basnik Nayes: None By a vote of 7-0, the motion passed. Village Board action will be required in this case. Eileen M. Reinhard Recording Secretary —VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROS"Cr PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT- ZBA-38-SU-89, GEORGE T. REILLY LOCATION: 308 ERIC COURT DATE: JUNE 13, 1989 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a Special Use as per Section 14.1101.C.5. to install one satellite dish at the rear of the house. VILLAGE STAFFCOMMENTS The various departments agreed that this satellite dish must not be located on or over the easements. They note that the Cablenet Tower for Cable TV is located just to the west of this lot. They question whether this tower will cause problems with this reception. No other comments or objcct.ons were received from Village staff. I Mr. Reilly is requesting a Special Use Permit in order to allow a satellite dish in his rear yard as per the Standards set forth in Section 14.1101.C.5. This dish will be approximately 11' in height, 10' in diameter, and located approximately 30 feet from the rear of the house outside of any easements. This home is located in the new Harvest Heights single family subdivision. This particular lot backs up to the Opus Business Park and is surrounded by single family homes on the three remaining sides. The proposed location of the satellite dish is to be in the northeast corner of this lot. The adjacent property owners affected most by this request would be the Opus Park users and the single family resident at 309 Eric Court. The petitioner will have to address what impact, if any, this satellite dish will have on these neighboring properties and bow it might be minimized. For background purposes, we have researched other satellite dish Special Use requests filed in the past few years and have found only three other cases. Two of these cases were withdrawn before any Board action and the other was for a satellite dish that had already been installed without permits and was eventually approved by the Village Board. As you can see from recent history, a satellite dish request such as this one is not common. Gil Basnik - Page 2 June 13, 1989 In summary the proposed location of the satellite dish appears to meet all of the conditions set forth in the Zoning Code. Since this is a Special Use request, a hardship is not necessary. The Board must use the standards set forth and weigh the impact, if any, that this dish may have on neighboring properties. The Board may also wish to condition any approval on the addition of landscape screening, especially on the eastern property edge. PB:hg Ar of SWVrv, il"t►CAST* 146440i• #0126 Of LAT 13 IDI HARVEST HEIGHTS, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PAR -T OF THE SOUTZ= QUARTER OF SECTION 35, TOWNSHIP 4$ NORTH, RANGE 11, EAST OF THE PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 88-147393 4ND AMENDED BY CERTIFICATE OF ;ORRECTION RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NO. 85-333001, IN COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS. N IV 43126"a EASC ME t L 0 T 13Ig z BUILDING DEPARTMENT 0 DATE INITIAL N ZOMNG 5 r I STRUCTURAL. M `� I — EL--- ECTRICAL s I PLUMBING Fire suppression J, HEALTH r a APProYed for Pcrr,, u �)1 ! �" i p• i l � I JAri ; 0 1989 INSPECTION SERVICES -1 �s 110111'1_1-1� Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager c: Police Chief Fire Chief FROM: Director Public Works DATE: June 26, 1989 SUBJECT: Fuel Bid Opening On June 26, 1989, sealed bids were opened for the proposed pur- chase of unleaded gasoline and diesel fuel for all Village vehi- cles. This bid is for one year and estimated quantities of 123,000 gallons of unleaded gasoline and 32,000 gallons of die- sel fuel. There were 15 invitational bids sent out plus adver- tising with a bid notice in local papers. Bids were received from six different vendors, and all were based upon OPIS (oil Price Information Service) data sheets. The cost of fuel will fluctuate throughout the year due to changes in the OPIS pricing at the time of ordering. All freight charges were included in the bid price, but no taxes. Any discounts for payment of in- voices within ten days are included in the base bid. Bid tabula- tions as follows: Type of Fuel/Cost per Gallon Unleaded gasoline Diesel Fuel Royal Fuel Liquid .7830 .4856 Energies Inc. Graham oil Co. .7826 .4947 Wright Industries Inc. .8136 .5125 Osco Incorporated .8080 .5029 Lake Cook Farm Supply Co. .8142 .5060 J.M. Sweeney Company .9012 .5820 The bids were very close, and I recommend acceptance of the low- est overall bid as submitted by Royal Fuel Liquid Energies Inc. They are .0004 cents higher than Graham oil Co. on unleaded gasoline, but are .0091 lower on diesel fuel. Combining our total estimated purchases of both fuels makes the Royal Fuel Co. bid lower than that Graham oil Co. We have used both suppliers in past years and have no complaints on service or quality of product. Herbert L. Weeks HLW/td VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FUEL PURCHASES 6-27-89 Applicable taxes Per gallon Unleaded gasoline base bid .7830 State tax .1300 Cook County tax .0600 Federal tax .0910 Net price per gallon . . . . . . . 1.0640 Diesel fuel base bid .4856 State tax .1550 Net price per gallon . . . . . . . .6406 1989-90 budget estimate .90/gallon Village at Mount Prospect'"' Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager FROM: Michael Sims, Planner DATE: June 28, 1989 SUBJECT: Summary of Bids for the Handicapped Accessible Doors Project, Mt. Prospect Village Hall, Senior Center, Train Station, and Mt. Prospect Library Bids were advertized in the Daily Herald on June 9, 1989 for a bid opening date of June 28, 1989. Contractors were asked to submit bids for the purchase and installation of three door operators and associated equipment for the Mount Prospect Village Hall; one door operator and associated equipment for the Mount Prospect Senior Center; one door operator and associated equipment for the Mount Prospect Train Station and seven sliding door systems for the Mount Prospect Library. Quotes were also requested for the installation of seven handicapped railings, an additional door operator at the Senior Center and the weatherstripping for the Senior Center doors. Two contractors were contacted regarding this project. Both picked up bid documents and both submitted bids to the Village for the work. The following is a summary of the bids we received: Stanley Magic Door, Inc. - $67,900.00 Tee Jay Service Company - $55,035.00 The low bidder was Tee Jay Service Company. A reference from Northwest Memorial Hospital in Chicago gave the low bidder a very high recommendation. Staff has reviewed the quotes received and would recommend that the quote from Tee Jay Service Company be approved. This project is being jointly funded by the Village of Mount Prospect and the Mount Prospect Library. The Village's share of the work is $35,347.00. The Mount Prospect Library will pay the contractor $19,688.00. Total project cost .... $55,035.00. -' 1. 1 Funding for this project is from account 23-062-06-8001 which has a balance of $58,400.00. MS:c1 Approved: lkva Mme' & David M. Clements, Director villase C -P IvIcurort Moum Prw;;Sc-., Illinois INTEROFFICE M VAC RAN CUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Engineering Coordinator DATE: June 28, 1989 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION - Resurfacing Program (89 -00000 -01 -GM) On June 28, 1989, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the 1989 General Maintenance - Resurfacing Program. BIDS RECEIYRECEIVED, Eight contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of five Contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of $616,076.88 by Arrow Road Construction to high of $712,56.95 by J.A. Johnson Paving Co. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was 648,003.75. All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds or Cashier's Checks in the amount of 5% of their total bid as required by the Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. The lowest bid was 5% below the estimate. All Bids were based on Engineer's Estimate of $648,003.75. BIDDER TOTAL BI 1.) Arrow Rd. Construction Co. $616,076.88 2.) Allied Asphalt Paving Co. $629,914.05 3.) Palumbo Bros., Inc. $631,998.90 4.) American Asphalt & Sealcoating Co., Inc. $690,835.90 5.) Johnson Paving Co. $712,563.95 Q_qALIFICATLONS OF LOW,BIDDER The low bidder, Arrow Road Construction Co., has performed work in Mount Prospect over the past several years. This will make the fourth year in a row that they have completed the Village's Resurfacing Program. For the most part, Arrow Road's quality of work is very good. Page Two Resurfacing Program RECOMMENDATION Based on the evaluation of the Bids received, I recommend awarding a contract to Arrow Road Construction Co., with a bid price of $616,076.88. Funding for this project is shown on Page 153 of this year's budget with the Account Nos. shown below. A=O-!LN—T NO. AMOUNT BUDGET 22-071-04-8510 $175,000.00 $175,000.00 22-071-04-8505 $288,604.95 $600,000.00 1-071-04-8495 $152,471.93 $480,000.00 Robert Pszanka I concur with the above recommendation Charles Bencic, Director of Inspection Services I concur with the above recommendation I�A Herbert L. Weeks, Director of Public Works RP:CB/m Village o1 Mouin Prospect 1989 Genarei M"menance Resurfacing Program 69--00000-01-GM June 28. 1989 10 00 A M. t Bit Concrete Surface Cryo MD Cl 1 2 2. Level Binder Machine Method MC T2 3 Level Binder Machine Method MB T2 4. Bit Malls Prime RC -70 5. Bit Malls Prime MC -30 6. Preparation of Base 7. Bit Surface gem12.5 8. Bit Surface Reml 2 9. Bit Sudece Rami Vat Depth 10 Pavements Replacommil Surface Crse I Y. Pavamem Replacement (Special) 12. Area Re6ece" Crack Control 13. Poured Crack Seat 14. Div Grout Solids 15. Holes Dow 16. Sir, To Be Ad) Y 7. Slr. To Be Reconstructed 18. From 8 Lids To Be Ary. 19. Traffic Control A Protection Estimeled Arrow Road Const Co ANS Aspllatt Paving Co. - - A+cm AaphaR 8LJ.A.Johnsair T owwwwwo. 0. NsrdlrM Const. CO _ Conc Curb d Gutter Remi A Rape 15.480 PaWmbo Brea.Inc. SeakvatknC Paving Co. 10065 2429 263.91085 7,-0. 1045 Hillside IN,rnpneer'e 950 Ma 10.45 203.588.00 EM•H41e�Of Ealknale 3. Curb Remi A T BB. 12 Rep 1640 24,33 39.901.20 2650 23-00 287,922.50 37,720.90 22.8{1 247,72200 27.00 27 242.610.00 off 11.45 3,893.00 10-95 4017 21.23 85.280.@i 22.50 50,382.50 22.80 37,39200 26.0042,64000 2,461.25 26.00 2,612.50 2§ 271,$25-1X1 1350 13.50 3400 0.96 3,289.00 085 2,890.00 22.80191.587.60 5,680.00 26.00 104,442.00 25.00 100,425.00 25.00 41,000.00 350.00 9952 0.96 9,073.82 065 6,143.60 1-45 4,930.00 145 4.930.00 1,00 3,406.00 23.00 92,391.00 350.00 20625 0.37 7,831.25 0.10 2,062-50 /.t5 10,869.80 1.15 10,86980 1.00 9,452.00 0. T5 2,550.00 �0. Maintenance Bar1d 24 -Mia {Nae -M 60125 162 6t,327.50 i. 10 66,137.50 0.25 1.10 5,156.25 0.50 10,312.50 0.45 9,281-25 0.75 0.30 7,059,00 1,500.00 17200 0.97 16,084.00 1.05 15,060.00 66,137.50 1.00 60,125.00 1.35 81,168.75 6,187.50 27410 1.03 28,232.30 0.95 28,039.50 1.00 17,200.00 0.90 15,480,00 1.25 21,50000 1.10 68,137.50 255 9.31 2.374.05 16.50 4,207.50 0.90 24,669.00 0.85 23,298.50 1.07 29,328.70 17,260.00 2290 15.15 34.893.50 t5.75 36.067.50 12.00 3,060.00 18.00 1, 580.00 10.00 2.550,00 0.75 75 20,557.50 23845 0-62 t1,783.90 0.60 14,307.00 -� 15.800.00 13.00 29.770.00 14.00 32.080.00 t0.00 2,550.00 36175 0.48 17,364.00 0.25 9,043.75 0-60 14,307.00 068 18.214.60 0.65 15,499-25 18,00 11.220.00 735 5.50 4,012.50 5.00 3,675.00 0-33 15.00 11,937.75 0-26 9,405.50 0.40 14,470.00 0.75 0.50 17,88375 t74 86.00 9,036.00 90.00 9.450.00 165.00 11,025.00 15.80 11.813.00 1600 11,760-00 5.00 18.067.50 72 15800 11.554.00 13fi.00 9,990.00 150.00 17.325.00 174-00 16,270.00 1750, 18.375.00 20600 3,675,00 2 327.00 854.00 590.00 1.180.00 480.00 11.100.00 130.60 9.620.00 _; 145.00 10,730.00 150-00 21,00000 26 12800 OD 10.00 1000.00 920.00 885.00 1,370.00 150.00 300.00 550.00 11,100-00 2457.00 2.057.00 1,000.00 1,5000.00 T, 700000 3770BO 150,00 1,100.00 3,900 00 solar 1 900.00 900.00 125.60 125.00 1.000.00 1.000.00 20.00().00 5mm 20.000.00 �,,,,,,,, 16.1006.00 10,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00 village of Mount Prospect 1989 General Mrimlenance Curb A Gutter Improvements 89 -00000 -02 -GM June 28, 1989 1000 A M Na. Ilam Eslfmated TdaNa Corm! Co. Gbbe Cama. Co. M 8 A Cement f Comp 13f,a NMae U, T owwwwwo. 0. NsrdlrM Const. CO _ Conc Curb d Gutter Remi A Rape 15.480 8.95 174,346,00 M 2. Integra! Cane Curb Remi A Re til 7,-0. 1045 950 185,080-00 10.45 203.588.00 13-50 262,986,00 3. Curb Remi A T BB. 12 Rep 370 79054-25 1000 75,650.00 11.45 .6,619-25 13-50 102,127.50 Com, Curb d. Curb Curb T B Rem18 Rep 11.45 3,893.00 10-95 3,723.00 / 1-d5 3,.93.00 5 Cuff Structure To Be A 275 77 ..95 2,461.25 9.50 2,612.50 11.15 3,148.75 1350 13.50 4 590 00 6 Curb Structure To Be Recon 7 165.00 11,715.00 8000 5,680.00 185.00 13,135.00 125.00 3,712.50 7. Cum Sir To Be Adj w1Ty i Fr-. O 350.00 2,450.00 1.150.00 8,050.00 490.00 3,430.00 8,875.00 -L e. Sodding 96 260.00 23.400.00 198.00 17,820.00 350.00 3i,` ) 00 600.00 4:1(00) 9. TretllC Control BProtectbn 4,623 2..5 13,175.55 5.85 27,044.55 4.00 18,492.00 25040 22,500.00 �0. Maintenance Bar1d 24 -Mia {Nae -M 1 900 00 .00.00 2.000.00 2.000.00 1,500.00 1.500.00 4-bD 5.000.00 20, 003.50 1 0.00 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 500.00 cm m .., ,,.. 5,000.00 . _ _ - Ertgklea's Esto osre 12001 233,760.60 15001 113,475.00 15..00 5.100.00 9.08 2.475.88 150-00 10.650.00 550.00 3.850.00 400-00 36.000.00 5.00 23,115.00 2.000.00 2.000.00 .-000.00 600..00 Total 430,925.00 Village C1 lAcurn-t Pr=51=QC-t' Mourn Pt rte., Illinois II il I Z1. 1 4--1 i, INITROFFICZ,AVACRAN OUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Engineering Coordinator DATE: June 28, 1989 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION - Material Testing Consultants On , June 28, 1989, at 10:00 A.M., Proposals were received for 1989 Resurfacing Program - Material Testing. PROPOSAL Consultants were requested to submit unit prices for Field & Laboratory services in conjunction with the Resurfacing and Curb & Gutter Programs. PRQPOSALS RECEIVED Seven consultants were solicited for Proposals. A total of three consultants submitted Proposals. ANALYSIS OF DID$ Proposals were based on the material testing of 20,000 tons of Bituminous Concrete & 30,000 lineal ' feet of concrete curb & gutter. Consultants were requested to submit unit prices for 1.) Compaction Control : per Hour 2.) Plant Inspection : per Ton 3.) Concrete Cylinders : per Each & per Trip 4.) Laboratory Services : per Hour RECOMMENDATIO The three consultants were: 1.) Professional Service Industries, Inc. - Hillside, Ill. Page Two 2.) Material Testing Laboratories, Inc. - Bellwood, Ill. 3.) Soil and Material Consultants, Inc. - Arlington Heights Although all of the consultants submitted reasonable proposals and are all eminently qualified, the Engineering Division recommends accepting the Contract Proposal of Professional Service Industries, Inc., Hillside, Ill. The consultant will also be asked to perform material testing for the 1989 reconstruction projects. Based on the estimated amount of proposed construction, the Engineering Division recommends that a $15,000.00, not to exceed, contract be awarded. Funds for this Contract would be from Account No. 1-071-04-8501 : Resurfacing General Fund - Budget Amount $ 100,000.00 Robert Pszanka I concur with the above recommendation Charles Bencic, Director of Inspection Services I concur with the above recommendation 'Z. W"-ekA Herbert L. Weeks, Director of Public Works RP:CB/m Village Cf Mount pr=spect 'Woum prweal, Illinois INT11110FIFICIM F -IAC RAN 0 tiM TO: village Manager FROM: Engineering Coordinator DATE: June 28, 1989 SUBJECT: RECOMMENDATION - General Maintenance/Curb & Gutter 89 -00000 -02 -GM On _June 28, 1989, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the 1989 General Maintenance Program - Curb & Gutter. mm man* Seven contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of four contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of $311,395.05 by Trialta Construction Co. to high of $434,798.50 by Nardulli Construction Co. The Engineer's Estimate for the project was 430,925,00. All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds or Cashier's Checks in the amount of 5% of their total bid as required by the Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly signed their bids and bid bond. The lowest bid was 28% below the estimate. All bids were based on Engineer's estimate of $430,925.00. BIDDER TOTAL BID 1.) Trialta Construction Co. $311,395.05 2.) Globe construction Co. $329,140.05 3.) M & A Cement Co. X365,784.00 4.) Nardulli Construction Co. ;434,798.50 Q_UAL1FICAT1pXS OF LOW BIDDER The low bidder Trialta Construction Co., has completed various concrete sidewalk projects throughout the Village over the past several years. Their quality of work is good and they complete their projects in a timely manner. Page Two Curb & Gutter Program RECOMMENDATION Based on the Bids received, I recommend awarding a contract to Trialta Construction Co., with a Bid price of $311,395.05. Funding for this project is shown on Page 153 of this year's budget under Account Code No. 22-071-04-8505 which currently has $600,000.00. Robert Pszaiik—a I concur with the above recommendation Charles Bencic, Director of Inspection Services I ccncur with the above recommendation �A- Herbert L. Weeks, Director of Public Works RP: CB/m V4+age of Maunf Prospect 1989 Genet at Maenlenance nesurtacing Prognon 89 -00000 -0 1 -GM June 28, 19139 1"00 A M fN° Item Esijmale0 Arrow Road Const Co Allied Paving Co. ikaantttp Mount 19. Halada il�#sh Qelumbo &os. #nc. Seaicoa[ing Co., Inc. J -.Johnson Paving Co. � 1 I Bit Concrete Surface Crso MD Cl T2 10865 2x.29 Hillside t8. Wheaton Aaphaq Co. Inc His. IN. (( Engineer's Estimate ?. Leval Binder Machine Method MC T2 1640 24.33 263,970.85 39,901.20 26.50 287.922.50 22.80 247,722.1X# 27.00 293,355.00 f level Binder Machine Method MB T2 x017 21-23 23.00 37,720.00 22.80 37,392.00 26,00 27.00 293 355 00 i 25.00 271,625.00 a. Bit Ma115 Prime RC -70 3x00 85,28(7.91 22.50 90,382.50 22.80 91,587.60 26.00 42,640.00 26.00 42,640.00 25.W 41,000 00 ( 5. Bit Malts Prlme MC -30 9452 0.96 3,264.00 0.85 2,89G O6 7.45 !930.00 104,/42.00 25 o0 100.425.00 23-00 92,397 00 J 6. Preperation of Bese 3 20625 0.98 8.0]3-92 065 6,143.80 1.15 10,069.80 1.45 4,930.00 1.00 3,400.00 t 0.75 2,550.00 7. 80 Surface Rent 2 5 0.37 7,631.25 0.70 2,062.50 025 5,156.25 1.15 10,869-80 1.00 9.452.00 0.75 7,089.00 8. 88 Surface Rem12 1j 60125 77200 1.02 61,327.50 tt 1.70 66,137-50 1.10 66,137.50 0.50 /0,31250 0.45 9,281.25 0.30 19. Bit Surface Ram# Val Depth 27/ 10 0.97 (8.684.00 i LOS 18.060..00 1 DO 17,200.00 1.00 0.90 SO,t2500 135 81,168.75 1.10 66,737710 -50 10 Pavement gepiecemenl Surface Crsa 255 1..03 28,232.30 0.95 26.039-50 9U 24,669.710 0.65 15,480.00 1.25 21,500.00 I 7.00 17,200.00 '....11. Pavanienl comanl (Specie#) 8 31 2,374.05 16-50 4,20750 X200 3,060.00 23,298.50 1.07 29,328 70 0.75 20,557.50 rupee Area Reflective Crsc3s Co.,,., 2290 75.15 34,693.50 15.75 20.00 45.000.00 18.00 4.59000 10.00 2.550.00 i 10.00 2,550.00 f3 Poured Crock Seel 23845 0.62 1!,783-90 0.60�T� 14,307.00 060 14,307.00 13.00 29,770.00 14.00 32,060-00 [ 18,00 41,220.00 14 Dry Groul Solids 36175 0.48 17,364.00 0.25 9,043-75 s 33 11,937.75 0.68 16,214.60 0.65 15,499.25 0.75 17,883.75 15. Holes Drilled 735 5-50 4,042.50 5.00 3,675.00 15.00 11,025.00 0.26 9,!05.50 0.40 1d,470.W 0.50 18,087 50 I6. Str. To Be Ad) 105 06.,00 9,030.00 go 9.!50.00 165.00 17,325.00 15.60 11,613.06 1600._ 11,760.00 500 3,675.00 77. Sir. To Be Reconsbucfed 74 756.00 11,544.00 135.00 9.990.00 150.00 11,100.00 174,00 is,270.Op 1750. 18,375.00 200-00 21,000.00 t8 "Ann. Lids TOB. Adj. 2 327.00 654.00 590-00 1,180.00 460.00 920.00 130.00 9,820.00 745.00 10,730.00 150.00 11,t00.W 19. Traffic Control 6 Protection 26 12800 3,326.00 135.00 3.510.00 110.00 2,866.00 685.00 1,370-0 150.00 300,00 550.00 1.100.00 20. Maintenance Bond 24-Mih (No.-MF7) 1 / 2,057-00 2900.00 1 �_0 ,00 1.1025.00 7,000.00 7.00000 155.00 X500-tkl 4,030.00 145.00 3,770.. g0 150 00 3. 90000 90000 1,000.00 1,ib$,00 oo �b0�0,00 72,5090,00 12,500.00 2,00000 2.00000 _ To€at 616.076.86 Tri 629414.05 n.... r:,,, 90.00 750.00 750.00 Vinaga of Mount Prospe7 1989 General Maintenance Curb 8 Guner Improvements 89-OGOOO-02-GM June 28, 1989 10:00 A M Estimated Trle6a Conat Co. Globe Conal. Co. M 8 A Coolant No am Casa NO" M. F rduBt Const. Co Engineer's Estkneta Addison. I8. Bensenville, f9. - t8 I . Comb Conc Curb A Guitar pool! A Rai 79-80 8.95 1!.4.346.00 T-3 ' 2. #ntaOrat Cork Curb Rom# -Rapt 7,565] 10.45 5,605Q00 1245 ,11 286,619.25.5002,/27DO 12 5go 0 15.00 1175W3. tn#egral Com Ramt A T 88.12 RePI 340 17454. Calc Curb T B Ra11Rapt 2J5 8.95 3'893 00 t .723.00 11.45 3,893002,461.25 2,612.50 11.45 13-50 1,590.00 1500 5,#��5 Curb Structure To Be Ad 3,14875 53,712.50800 2,47500 I 7165.00 11,71500 601 5,680.00 185.00 13,135.00 125.00 8.875.00 150.00 10,650.00 6 Cum Structure 7o Be Re" 7 350 00 2,450.00 1,150 00 (( 7I 7 Cum Sir To Be Alit eiTy 1 Fr., 0. L j 8,050.00 490.00 3.43Q00 600.00 4,200.00 550.00 1 3,650.00 8 Sodding 90 260.00 23.400.00 198.00 17.820 00 350.00 31.500 00 4,623 2.85 13,175.55 5.85 27,044.55 4.00 18,492.00 250.00 22,500.00 400.00 36,000.00' 9 Trallic Control A Protection 1 900.00 900 00 2,000 00 _ 2, WO 4.50 20,803.50 5.00 j 23,115..00 10 Maintenance Bond 24-Mih{Non-MFT) 1 0.00 00 1,500.00 1,500.Q0 5.000.00 5.000.00 2.000.00 2,000.00 t 0.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 Soo on 500-00 70.00 10-00 - i0fat 311,39505 Total 329, 14005] Taal 500.00 SOO.00I _- 365 764-00 Taal 434 798-50 -- ....-... __-_, __-_ Tolai x30,925.00 Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: May 19, 1989 SUBJ: Highway Maintenance Contract The State of Illinois has submitted a new maintenance agreement for the following highways: Northwest Highway (in its entirety) Rt. 83 (from Kensington to Golf) Central Rd. (from Wolf to Arthur) This is a new agreement, which commences July 1, 1989 and ex- pires June 30, 1990. Our current agreement authorizes payment of $42,444.00 annually. The new agreement is for $49,071 which is an increase of $6,627.00. I believe this type of maintenance agreement is in the best interests of the Village and would recommend it being approved. Herbert L. Weeks HLW/eh Attachment OOW***ov a U Illinois Department of Transportation Division ofHighways/District 201 West Center Court/Schaumburg, Illinois/60196-1096 MAINTENANCE Agreements FY 90 May 15, I989 Mc. Herbert Weeks, Director Village of Mt. Prospect lUO South Emerson street Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 Dear Mc, Weeks: Enclosed are three (]) copies of the Agreement for Maintenance of Municipal Streets for the period July I, 1989, to June 30, 1990. The agreement will be renewable annualIy. Reimbursement to the municipality is developed through the basic approach of classifying the roadways depending on their use by traffic, and applying a unit cost per lane mile based no that traffic volume. This approach was approved by the zIIiooio Municipal League's Public Works Committee at their June 4, 1975, meeting. For this agreement period, July l, 1989, to June 30, 1990, the latest available published traffic counts were utilized along with an adjustment factor of 2.70 which reflects the increase in the maintenance cost index as developed by the Federal Highway Administration. Enclosed is a copy of Illinois Department of Transportation Departmental Maintenance Policy No. X-7 which explains in detail the payment formula, and states what maintenance work is included in that payment. Please have the proper signatures, the Clerk's Certification and the Municipality Seal affixed to all copies of the agreement and cetoco to this office as soon as possible, for further processing. If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Robert Holub at (312)705-4163. Very truly yours, Charles B. Schroeder District Maintenance Engineer RJH/gf Enclosure INSTRUCTIONS MAINTENANCE X-7 INTRODUCTION The Department of Highway Code to enter into Transportation is authorized by Article `-`"" "/ the Illinois of State hi�"°=�� located with municipalities for the maintenance implementation w`�ntheir corporate limits. The guidelines for X_7, emancaom and use of such agreements are found in Maintenance Policy As explained in the Policy, the reimbursements to the municipalities will be bayed on the lane miles of roadway included in those agreements The rate per lane mile will be determined through the use of an empirical formula which is included as Attachment l of the 9ol1cy. The formula was dexe}u,~~to produce a range of reimbursement rates comparable with this Department'~cost experi- ences for supplying the same services to be provided by the municipalities. - THE COMPUTATION SHEET The Computation Sheet (Form MAI 411) is used to determine the amount of reim- bursement due to a municipality for the maintenance of the State highways - included in an agreement. The reimbursement rate per lane mile is to be determined through the use of the empirical formula. When using the empirical formula, the average daily traffic (8 D T ) to be used should be taken from the latest published traffic map. T'`a'^f'�c counts on marked State routes can be found on the State Traffic Map. Traffic counts on unmarked State routes can normally he found on the appropriate County traffic map- If a published traffic count is not available at the appropriate location, an A.O.T. may be approximated from district research data and then footnoted on the Computation Sheet. It is important that the A.D.T.sed in the computations be related to documented data and not determined arbitrarily. itrarily, The A.D.T. to be applied to streets covered by Municipal Maintenance Agreements should reflect, as accurately as possible, the A.D.T. attributable to the traffic brought into the municipality by the State oute. Some guidelines for determining the correct A.O.T. to use when computing the reimbursement rate are given below. I. The A.D.T. for a route going through a municipality without junctioning with another State highway shall be the sum of the published A.O.T. counts at both corporate limits divided by two. 2, The A.D.T. of a route that crosses one of the corporate limits and terminates within the municipality shall be the published A.D.T. where the route crosses the corporate limits, ' 3. The-A.D.T. of a segment of a route, that enters the munici- pality and junctions or merges with another State route within the corporate limits, shall be the published A.D.T. where the segment crosses the corporate limits. o. The A.D.T. of a segment of a route that both accumulates traffic and diverts traffic from and/or to other State routes within the corporate limits shall be the sum of the A-D.T,'s of the routes feeding both ends of the segment divided by two. 5. The A.D.T. of u route with both termini within the corporate limits shall be the A.D.T. established by the best available documented evidence. 6. No intermediate traffic counts will be made between published traffic maps for the purpose of rate adjustment. The Computation Sheet has amlmmn to indicate the source ofthe A,O.T, used for each segment of street. The entry in this column will usually be \-year or C -year (i.e. S-79) to indicate that the A.D.T. used was taken from either a State or a County traffic map for the year of publication. Other sources snuuld be expla`ned �: a footnote on the Computation Sheet. The number of lanes to be divided into the total A.D.T., to arrive at the A.D.T. per lane mile, shall be the number of lanes for which the State has maintenance responsibility and not necessarily the total number of lanes on the street- All center lanes which are available for continuous left turns, which are State maintenance responsibility, shall be included in the computations for reimbursement as traffic lanes. Reimbursement for the maintenance of turning lanes located at intersections shou1d be computed at the same rate as the adjacent traffic lanes. However, these turning lanes should not be included when computing the reimbursement rate per lane mile for the traffic lanes located on that portion of the street. Wten computing the number of lane miles shown on the Computation Sheet always multiply the number of linear feet of roadway maintained by the number of lanes and divide this product by 5,280. Round the result off to the nearest hundredth of a lune mile. This procedure should be used in order to ensure uniform computations for all agreements. Once the number of lane miles has been calculated and the A.D.T. determined from an appropriate source, the A.D.T. per lane mile may be computed. This number is needed for use in the empirical formula to calculate the rate of reimbursement per lane mfle. The rate of reimbursement may then be multiplied by the 'number of lane miles maintained and the Adjustment Factor to determine the Sub -Total for each section of roadway included in the agreement. The Adjustment Factor is determined by the Central Bureau of Maintenance and is changed annually by application of the current "Highway Maintenance Operations Cos -t Trend Index" which is published by the Federal Highway Administration. Du not use any Adjustment Factor other than that currently authorized by the Central Bureau of Maintenance. Where medians are included for maintenance by agreement we request that the width and type be described for informational purposes. The The base rates for median maintenance are given in Attachment l of Maintenance Policy X-7. The adjustment factor should be applied to median maintenance reimbursement rate ca|culations. The Computation Sheet should be completed in accordance with these instructions and the resulting "Grand Total" for reimbursement costs shall be shown If the total maintenance allowance for Fiscal Year 1975 for a municipality exceeds the total resulting from the present application of the formula the following statement should be made on the bottom of the last computation formula, "Criteria used for Fiscal Year 1976 provided a total maintenance and cleaning allowance of %xxxx which will be continued for the term of this Agreement." This statement should mut' l if the current lesser reimbursement amount is the result of a reduced number of lane miles maintained. In that situation the lesser amount should be used. ` THE AGREEMENT FORM Following the completion of the Computation Sheet, the Agreement for Mainte- nance of Municipal Streets (Form MAI 4I6) should be filled out. The correct "Grand Total" from the Computation Sheet should he shown on the Agreement, along with the proper dates and the name of the municipality. After completing this form in duplicate, it should be submitted to the municipality for execu- tion by the proper officials. Following execution by the municipality, both ~ copies of the partially executed agreement should be forwarded to the `ur°au of Maintenance (by June 15) for signature by the Director of HighwaysOne of the original copies, which has been signed both parties, will be returned to the district for transmittal to the municipality. INVOICING On quarterly intervals prior to September 30^ December 31, March 31and June 30, a representative from the district should conduct an inspection of the roadways maintained by agpeement. Joint inspections with municipal repre- sentatives are preferred. Following the inspection, the municipality should be authorized to invoice the State for one quarter of the annual reimbursement or be advised of deficiencies to be corrected before such invoicing will be authorized. Invoices should be submitted regularly at the proper times and extremely early or late submittals should be discouraged. Invoices should be submitted by the municipalities to the district for approv- al. They should be checked for accuracy and, if found to be satisfactory, approval for payment should be indicated by the district representative's initials on the front of the invoice. The total amount of all invoices submitted by a municipality for a fiscal year should total to the exact amount shown in the Agreement. Invoicing that leaves an insignificant balance or exceeds the annual allowance by a few cents requires accounting work which is not Justified by the small sums involved. August 12, 1976 EMPIRICAL FORMULA FOR COMPUTING Attch. 1 ORDER 16-1 RATE OF COMPENSATION The factors representing the effects of traffic densities in the formula were interpolated from studies that indicate that routine maintenance requirements per centerline mile are related to traffic densities and that dispersal of total traffic over additional travel lanes can, at certain levels of traffic density, reduce the per -lane -mile maintenance requirements. The empirical formula (shown below) establishes equitable reimbursement rages for the period from July 1, 1975 to June 30, 1977. An adjustment factor, based on fluctuation Of the cost -index for Highway Maintenance and Operations from the latest available Federal Highway Administration publication of Highway Statistics, may ed by the Central Bureau of Maintenance prior to the preparabe tion of the agreements in each odd -numbered year. The ADT (Average Daily Traffic Count) to be applied to the empirical formula shall be taken from the latest published State traffic map data for marked routes and from the latest published county traffic maps for unmarked routes. The ADT applied shall be, to the extent available, the average of the ADT count at the corporate limits where the route crosses such corporate limits. No special °� aff c counts will be made, authorized or recognized for application to the formula between officially published traffic maps. EMPIRICAL FORMULA BASED ON ADT PER LANE MILE Under 250 *AOT/LANE - 2250 250-2500 *ADT/LANE - (Excess over 250) x 0.1 + 5250** 2500-5000 *AOT/LANE - (Excess over 2500)'x 0.05 + 5475- 5000-4)p *ADT/LANE - (Excess over 5000) x 0.02 + $600** *ADT/LANE - Published AOT - Number of traffic lanes on the street and not necessarily number of traffic lanes of State responsibility. Maintenance allowance for medians shall be as follows: Flush median - $165 per centerline mile Curbed median - 2330 per centerline mile **Maxim= of preceding bracket. 0 CAF/ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR ROADWAY MAINTENANCE WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have accepted maintenance responsibilities for specified State roadways within the corporate boundaries of the Village; and WHEREAS, pursuant to the requirements of the Illinois Department of Transportation, an Agreement is executed annually which specifies the responsibilities assumed by the Village of Mount Prospect, a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "All; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that it would be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to extend the existing Agreement between the Illinois Department of Transportation for roadway maintenance, which Agreement provides for reimbursement to the Village for said roadway maintenance in the amount of $49,071.00. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect do hereby authorize and direct the Village President to execute and the Village Clerk to attest his signature on the Agreement between the Illinois Department of Transportation and the Village of Mount Prospect for roadway maintenance, a copy of said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor elf 1989. Ara^=ment for Maintenance of Municipal Streets THIS xGREEM[wT, made and entered into this day of A.D. l9 , by and between the State of Illinois, acting by ani—through rrans- nvrtativn, hereinafter referred to as the "Department" and the village of Mt. Prospect, o municipal corporation organized and existing under and by virtue of the laws of the State of Illinois, hereinafter referred to as the "Corporation". Wurw[o3ETH, that for and in consideration of the covenants hereinafter mention- ed, the Corporation agrees to operate and maintain for the period beginning July l, 1989. and ending June aU, 1990, in a manner satisfactory to the Department, portions of certain streets being used 'as extensions or parts of State highways lying within the boundaries of the Corporation. It is understood and agreed that this anreempht may, in'i'he discretion of, toe Department, be extended to cover the twelve month period ending June aO, 1991, under the same temu, conditions and amounts stipulated herein, subject to an adequate appropriation being enacted by the General Assembly, unless the Corporation gives written notice to the Department of termination. Such extension shall be accom- plished Tho Department reserves the right to amend this agreement at the time of the extension by adjusting the inflation factor used to determine the rates of compensa- tion by application or the most recent Federal Highway Administration's "Highway Maintenance and Operations cost Trend Index." It is further understood that the terms of this agreement may he adjusted by addendum during the agreement's tenure to compensate for the addition or deduction of lane miles of streets to be maintained. Such addendum shall be approved and signed by both parties. Operation and maintenance includes but is not limited to all routine surface and pothole repairs, temporary full -depth patchos, expansion hump removal on bituminous surfaces, crack and joint sealing, cleaning and litter pickup, snow and ice control and all other routine operational services. Median maintenance, when appl1ra0e, shall consist of swepping, litter pickup, mowing, and routine surface repairs. The Corporation agrees to operate and maintain the streets covered by this agreement in the best interests of the people of the State of Illinois. The portions of streets to be maintained are described on the Computation skeet (Fnnn Mai. 411) ao ma attached hereto d made e o part Oereof. The Corporation agrees to permit no cots or openings in the curbs or pavements of the streets covered by this agreement without the written approval of the Depart- ment. pavement cuts, curb open1ngs, utility frames and municipal frames and grates or covers disturbed by settlement, construction or repair under permit are to be restored, repaired, adjusted and maintained by the utility owner or permit holder to the satisfaction of the Department at no expense to the State. The Corporation agrees that, except in extreme emergencies, it will not under- take or authorize repairs not cowered by this agreement, at the expense of the State, without securing the approval of the Department. The oe»ortment, in contracting with the Corporation for the maintenance and operation of the effected streets has curtailed procurement of tools, equipment and personnel. Reversion to maintenance by State forces could entail time-consuming reallocation of resources. The Corporation therefore agrees that it will not termi- nate this agreement nor refuse to enter into subsequent agreements without giving the Department written notice at lest 90 days prior to such termination. If the Corporation gives the Department written notice of intent to enter into no future agreoments, the current agreement will remain in rune for VV days from the receipt of such notice or until the termination date of the current agreement, whichever date is the later. The Department may, at its 4iycretion, release the Corporation from the agreement before the expiration of the 90 days required by the above stipu- lation. In consideration of the satisfactory maintenance and operation of streets covered by this agreement. the Department will pay the Corporation a total sum of Forty-nine Tkousandj Seventy-one and 00/100 dollars ($49.071.00). for the twelve month period covered by the aqreement, payable as described below. On or about March 31, June 30, September 30, and Dezember 31, of each year, sub- ject to an inspection by the Department, the Department will authorize the Corpora- tion to invoice the Department in an amount equal to approximately one-fovr0 of the total annual allowance stated above. -2 - It Is further understood and agreed that the Department, when In Ile judgment It Is expedient to do so, and at Its discretion, shall have the right to terminate this agreement by giving written notice to the Corporation not lose than thirty (30) days In advance of the date of such termina- Ilon. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by , their duly authorized officials. City (or Village) of State of Illinois Deaprtment of Transportation By By Director of Highways Mayor or President Attest. City (or Village) Clark STATE OF ILLINOIS COUNTY OF CITY (OR VILLAGE) OF I, Clerk of the City (or Village) of do hereby certify that the foregoing Is one of the original copies of an agreement which was executed on behalf of the City (or Village) of by , Mayor (or President) and Clerk, who were duly authorized to execute said agreement by a resolution, duly adopted by the City Council (or Board of Trusleasl o! such City (^_r Village) on the , A.D. 19 Given under my hand and the official seal of the -01 , This day of { A.D. 19 (seal) Clerk. MAI 4 1 B (REV. 2-81) AGREEMENT TOTAL $49,071.00 STATE OF ILLINOIS Page 1 of 1 DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION District No. 1 Village of Mt. Prospect COMPUTATION SHEET - MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE For the Period begining July 1, 1989, ending June 30, 1990 MAINT. ALLOWANCE INTERSECTING 91REETS PORTIONS UNDER AGREEMENT Total Built No. Length Lane Adt/ Rate Adj. Route Section Street Name From To Width By Width Lanes Locations In Ft. Miles Lane Source Ln/Mi Factor Subtotals Central Rd. @ Arthur Ave. S 12' 1187 0.23 Painted Median 165 2.70 102.47 FAU1300 58N83 Central Rd. Arthur Ave. 344' W/o 2@24' S 2@24' 4 Full 1187 0.90 5725 C186 615 2.70 1,494.45 Busse Rd. Roadway SA 117 117-1618 Central Rd. 344' W/o Busse Busse Rd. 44' C 44' 4 Full 344 0.26 5725 C186 615 2.70 431.73 Rd. Roadway SA 117 1618 Central Rd. Busse Rd. Elmhurst 44' C 44' 4 Full 4792 3.63 5725 C'86 615 2.70 6,027.62 Roadway SA 117 1819.1 Central Rd. Elmhurst Mt. Prospect 44' C 44' 4 Full 6072 4.60 5725 C'86 615 2.70 7,638.30 Roadway SA 117 1922.1 Central Rd. Mt. Prospect Wolf 48' C 48' 4 Full 3520 2.67 5725 C186 615 2.70 4,433.54 Roadway SA 013 0405.2 Elmhurst Lincoln Evanston- 48' C 48' 4 Full 4125 3.13 5925 S'87 619 2.70 5,231.17 Elgin Roadway SA 013 0405.2 Lincoln Main Elmhurst 36' C 36' 4 Full 740 .56 5925 S'87 619 2.70 935.93 Roadway SA 013 0405.2 Main Lincoln Central Rd. 48' C 48' 4 Full 2640 2.00 5925 S'87 619 2.70 3,342.60 Roadway SA 013 0606 Main Central Rd. Kensington 40' C 40' 4 Full 5445 4.13 5925 S'87 619 2.70 6,902.47 Roadway SBI 19 1964-14 NW Hwy Mt. Prospect Waterman 40' S 40' 4 Full 11220 8.50 3912 S'87 546 2.70 12,530.70 Roadway AGREEMENT TOTAL $49,071.00 /caf ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE FOR THE AMENDED TAX INCREMENT REDEVELOJ?MENT PROD CT AND REDEVELOPMENT PLAN WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois have heretofore adopted Ordinance No. 4011 entitled "An Ordinance Approving the *Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan" and Ordinance No. 4012 entitled "An Ordinance Designating the Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area", both of which are incorporated herein in their entirety; and WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan which were the subject of public hearings is in the best interests of the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect and is a public purpose; and WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is empowered, pursuant to the Tax Increment Allocation Redevelopment Act, Ll-J.,Rev.Stat. Ch 23, Sec. 11-74-.4-1 et. seg. as amended, of the Illinois Revised Statutes, to acquire by purchase, donation, lease or eminent domain real property within the redevelopment project area; and WHEREAS, the implementation of the aforementioned Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan would attract to the Village of Mount Prospect additional commercial ventures, increase business for commercial ventures currently established within the Village, strengthen the property and non - property tax and income bases, and would provide jobs for Village residents. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, AS FOLLOWS: SECTION ONE• That it is hereby determined that the Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan, previously adopted, be established, maintained, controlled, managed and operated within the Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area as described in Ordinance No. 4012 and that said Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan be occupied, improved, used and developed in a manner necessary and convenient for public use. SECTION TWO: That under the authority vested in the corporate authorities of the village of Mount Prospect through the statutes of the State of Illinois, it is hereby determined that pursuant to the Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan it is necessary and desireable that the Village shall acquire a fee simple title to and possession of the real property legally described as: Lot 13, except the South 32 feet thereof, in Block 4 in Busse and Willes Resubdivision in Mount Prospect, in the West 1/2 of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to the Plat recorded March 31, 1906 as Document 3,839,591, in Cook County, Illinois said real property shall hereinafter be referred to as "Subject �T Acquisition Page 2 of 2 Property", which property is within the foregoing Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project Area, as amended, and is necessary, required and needed to achieve the objectives of the foregoing Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan and which property lies wholly within the limits of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION THREE: That the law offices of Burke and Ryan be and is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate personally or through its representatives for and on behalf of the Village with the owner or owners of the Subject Property for the purchase thereof by the Village. SECTION FOUR: That in the event that said law firm or its agents is unable to agree with the owners of the Subject Property as to the compensation to be paid therefor, then fee simple title to and possession of the Subject Property shall be acquired by the Village of Mount Prospect through condemnation and the law offices of Burke and Ryan, as attorneys for the Village, is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to institute proceedings in any court of competent jurisdiction to acquire fee simple title to and possession of said Subject Property for said Village in accordance wi the eminent domain laws of the State of Illinois and the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect. U9112X-113EE! That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of _ Gerald L. Farley ATTEST: Village President Carol A. Fields Village Clerk 1989. /caf ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF...A REAL ESTATE PURCHA.S.E, AGREEMENT WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that, pursuant to the Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan, it is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the Village of Mount Prospect that the Village enter into a certain Real Estate Purchase Agreement, a copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the Village President and Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the Real Estate Purchase Agreement which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", the Board of Trustees having determined that the Agreement is, pursuant to the Amended Tax Increment Redevelopment Project and Redevelopment Plan, in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That the acts of the President Trustees, Village Clerk, officers, attorneys and employees of the Village necessary to implement, carry out, or give effect to the terms of the Real Estate Purchase Agreement, which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A", are hereby authorized. SECTION THREE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Village President , 1989. ` Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Nr. John F. Dixon, Village Manager FROM: Chuck 8endc` Inspection Services Director DATE: June 20, 1989 RE: DOUGLAS AVENUE IMPROVEMENT Attached is an invoice from Arlington Heights for work done by Arrow Road on Douglas Avenue within the Village of Mount Prospect Village 1 imi ts. As you may recall from my memo to you dated May 9, 1989, the Village of Arlington Heights was improving Douglas Avenue in conjunction with the Magnus Farm Development. Three (3) lots on the west side of Douglas between White Oak and Cypress Avenue are in the Village of Mount Prospect limits. With your approval I notified Bill B7ecke from the engineering department in Arlington Heights to complete the improvement adjacent to these three (3) lots in the same manner as the remaining Douglas Avenue improvement. At that time I informed Mr, 0leche that per our plats of survey, the Mount Prospect Village boundry was 130' in length in this area and that would be the limits of our participation. The Douglas Avenue improvement actually extended about 30' south of our Village limits in an area adjacent to the Arlington Heights Park District property. The attached invoice from Arrow Road indicates the quantities are for lbO' of roadway improvement rather than 730^. They also did not include the cost of the surface which has been installed. I have adjusted the invoice to reflect the cost of 130' of roadway improvement and to include the surface quantity. Therefore this should be our final cost for the improvement. I contacted Mr. 0ecke and confirmed the changes with him and he was in agreement with them. If you concur with the revised invoice, please notify me and I will have a P.O. prepared. Chuck Bencic C8:rm cc: Engineering File ENGINEERING DEPA VENT VILLAGE Of ARLINGT04-iJEW"TS 33 S. Arlin on Heights Road ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS WOOS Phone (312) 577-5625 TO . . ........ Village of Mt. Prospect —.100 S. Emerson Mt. Prospect, IL 60056 LET F� OF INTM-1 "M 6/13/89 I A m --ALU 1 84-7-1 A-9.110. Chuck Bencic Moorings Ij? For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submitcopiesfor distribution 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 -Returncorrected prints WE ARE SENDING YOU Z Attached 0 Under separate cover via the following items: THESE ARE TRANSMITTED as chocked below: IN For approval 0 Approved as submitted 0 Resubmit copies for approval Ij? For your use 0 Approved as noted 0 Submitcopiesfor distribution 0 As requested 0 Returned for corrections 0 -Returncorrected prints 0 For review and comment 0 0 FOR BIDS DUE 19 REMARKS Invoice from Arrow Road for Mt. Pro sect's S particiRation of curb and Paving south of Cypress. INWEL I 1UN URVICES COPY TO: LE OVILLAGE MANAGER 0 BUILDING DEPT. 0 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. William C. Blecke 0 TITLE; Deputy Director of Engineering N*A00ow"*Vna&S ow"d W25 INVOICE No.53419 ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 3401 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD P.O. BOX 334 MT. PROSPECT. ILLINOIS 60056 JUN 0 9 1989 TELEP14ONE 437-0700 VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON NIS. SOLD TO Village of Arlington Heights LOCATION: Douglas Avenue, Arlington Hts. 33 South Arlington Heights Road Arlington Heights, IL 60005 5 T� ����� 6Er►G"G Attn: Mr. Bill Blecke OUR JOS NO. EST. N0, CUSTOMER CONTRACT OR P.0 NO. TERMs PICKED UP AT PLANT INVOICE DA lE 821 Partial NET 10 DAYS 5/31/89 LUMP SUM �[ 0 sy 45 sy 45 sy 72 sy 32 sy 7.60 if 7.65 sf 58 By 2 each FORM 101 2-83 DESCRIPTION •-9liE Excavation and Subgrade Preparation Bituminous Concrete Surface Cse (1'") Bituminous Concrete Binder Cse (1k") Bituminous Aggregate Mix (BAM) (6") Granular Sub—Base Bituminous Driveway Replacement PCC Curb and Gutter Type B6.12 PCC Sidewalk (5") Sod & Topsoil Relocate Existing Mail Box Amount Due: A SERVICE CHARGE OF 1,.% PER MONTH (18% PER ANNUM) WILL BE CHARGED ON ALL ACCOUNTS AF"t ER 30 DAYS 1216.00 2.39 1.98 7.74 2.15 21.56 9.10 2.10 5.75 75.00 AMOUNT 1,216.00 '788, 0, 0.00 1i:.0. 89.10 72.3` 348.30 28Z-91: 154.80 t2J-.'7t 689.92 s e9•7 1,456.00 /18�. 556.50 S,fb. S' 333.50 ?_`9i 150.00 . 0` 4,994.12 4�J&5