HomeMy WebLinkAbout3989_001Next Ordinance No. 4028
Next Resolution No. 4-89
V9
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, let Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
March 7, 1989
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Carolyn Krause
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Norma Murauskis
Trustee Gerald Farley Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Wattenberg
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, February 21, 1989
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Request from new owners of Shogun Restaurant,
1176 S. Elmhurst Road, to continue operation
under the existing Class "R" liquor license. It
is proposed that the new name of the restaurant
will be Izakaya Sankyu.
B. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance would create a Class "P" liquor
license for Shimada Shoten, 1182 S. Elmhurst
Road. This establishment was formerly the
Koyota Restaurant.
C. Appointments
D. Announcements
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 8-V-89, The Alter Group, Lake Center Plaza
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING SPECIFIED
VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
LAKE CENTER PLAZA IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance grants certain variations as
follows: interior side yard requirement of 30 feet
to allow fifteen feet plus one foot for every two
feet of building height above fifteen feet; to
allow a thirty foot yard, rather than the required
forty feet, for side yards in an I-1 District
adjacent to Residential Districts subject to
(Exhibit A)
landscaping; to a twenty foot rear yard in an I -I
District adjacent to Resident District instead of
the required forty feet; to allow two parking lots
or shared drive of service/loading facilities
rather than the required ten foot side and rear
yards; to allow a zero yard for loading and ten
foot yard for parking, instead of the required
forty feet and ten feet; to allow a five foot side
yard, rather than the required ten feet, where 2
parking lots abut, provided a minimum of 101 of
landscaped area be provided between the 2 lots.
Also requested are variations to permit a minimum
2 acre parcel in the I-1 District, rather than the
required 4 acres; to permit 2 parking spaces 121 x
351 for buildings less than 40,000 sq. ft. in
area, rather than the required 121 x 501 loading
space; and, to permit a two parking lots of shared
drive or service facilities to abut in an O -R
District, rather than the ten foot side yard
required. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these variations by a vote of 6-0. These
variations were approved by the Zoning Board of
Appeals and Village Board in 1987, however the
effective period of one year has expired. (Exhibit B)
B. ZBA 1-V-89, 1613 Rosetree
The Petitioner is requesting a variation from the
required 10 foot side yard to 5 feet 5-1/2 inches
in order to build an addition to this home. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying this
request by a vote of 7-0.
C. ZBA 3-A-89 and ZBA 4-V-89, 420 W. Dempster Street
1. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED
SECTION OF CHAPTER 14 (ZONING) OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance amends the parking regulations
to change the parking space requirements from
10 per thousand square feet of floor area to
5 for specified uses and to create a parking
requirement for outdoor swimming pools of one
space per 75 square feet of water area. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 420 WEST DEMPSTER
STREET (DEMPSTER DEVELOPMENT CENTER)
This is Ordinance grants a variation to allow
a maximum building height of 38 feet for a
gymnasium building instead of the required 24
feet in an R-1 Single Family District. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by votes of 6-0. (Exhibit D)
D. ZBA 5-Z-89, ZBA 6 -SU -89 and ZBA 7-V-89,
1796 S. Elmhurst Road
Due to a deficiency in the original application,
this case is being returned to the Zoning Board of
Appeals.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 9-V-89, 808 Edgewood Lane
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
permit an additional 2 car garage to be added
to an existing 2 car garage. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 4-0.
X. VILLAGE MANAGERPS REPORT
A. A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
This Resolution appropriates $41,000 from Motor
Fuel Tax Funds for the purpose of installing
storm sewers on Haven Street. (Exhibit E)
B. Request to waive bidding procedure in order to
purchase Computer Aided Dispatch (CAD) equipment,
which is specialized equipment in the Police
Department.
C. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A LEASE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL
SOCIETY AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Agreement authorizes a 99 year lease for
the new Historical Museum, 101-103 S. Maple Street (Exhibit F)
D. Request to waive bidding procedure and authorize
purchase of a telemetry radio for the Fire
Department. This equipment is specialize
equipment and must be compatible with existing
radios.
E. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
Pursuant to newly adopted State law, the Village
Board must, in Executive Session, review and
approve the minutes of Executive Sessions for
the past 6 months.
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Phone 312 / 392-6000
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, pursuant to Section 10.403 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, a public hearing will be held by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect on Tuesday, March 7, 1989 at 7:00 P.M. in the Board Room
of the Senior Citizens Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois for the purpose of considering an appeal from
the decision of the Village Manager to revoke the business license
issued to P J's Trick Shop, 615 North Main Street, Mount Prospect,
Illinois.
Dated this 20th day of February, 1989.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
MAYOR
CAROLYN H KRAUSE
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
GERALD L FARLEY
LEO FLOROS
NORMA JMURAUSKIS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J WATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 312 / 392-6000
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, pursuant to Section 10.403 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, a public hearing will be held by
the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect on Tuesday, March 7, 1989 at 7:00 P.M. in the Board Room
of the Senior Citizens Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois for the purpose of considering an appeal from
the decision of the Village Manager to revoke the business license
issued to P J's Trick Shop, 615 North Main Street, Mount Prospect,
Illinois.
Dated this 20th day of February, 1989.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
~� ~
1USouth Emerson Street ^ Mount Prospect, Illinois 00058 ^ Telephone: (3]2)253`5675
TO: Mayor Krause and Village Trustees
FROM: William M. Blaine, Jr.` President, Board of Library Trustees
DATE: March 3, 1989
In January I988 the Mount Prospect Village Board arranged a loan
to the Mount Prospect Public Library in order for the Library to
maintain a Sunday schedule for the pub7ic.
Through careful fund management, the reduction of nine staff
positions and a decrease in other hours open, sufficient funds
have been accumulated to repay that loan, and it is my pleasure
to present u check at this time.
By maintaining the current staff reductions and reduced hours"
sufficient funds are available for the continuance of the current
Sunday hours.
kMB:ja
cc: Mr. J. F. Dixon
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FEBRUARY 21, 1989
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Krause called the regular meeting of the Mayor CALL TO ORDER
and Board of Trustees of the village Of Mount Prospect
to order at 7:30 P.M.
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Krause
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Gerald Farley
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Norma Murauskis
Trustee van Geem
Trustee Wattenberg
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Farley. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved APPROVE MINUTES
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the
Mayor and Board of Trustees held February 7, 1989.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
786,419
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
16,586
Community Development Block Grant Fund
12,987
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
50,535
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
98,034
Parking System Revenue Fund
3,446
Risk Management Fund
14f800
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
12,616
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
6,367
Special Service Area Const. #5
109,922
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
545
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
7,362
Escrow Deposit Fund
25,783
Police Pension Fund
FiremensO Pension Fund
Be f 4 4 -
Trust FVnd
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVE BILLS
There was discussion as to the proposal for a 30
foot front yard setback for businesses, noting that
it appears to be a severe restriction on businesses,
especially in areas with limited lot size. It was
noted that the parking amendments approved a few
months ago provided for a 30 foot setback for
parking and the proposal establishes the same
setback for buildings. The consensus of opinion
regarding this subject was that the staff and Board
would monitor the requests with the possibility of
taking another look at this subject at a future
date.
ORD.NO. 4027 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,
moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4027
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS
OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon rollcall: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - February 21, 1989
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to accept the financial report dated January 31,
1989, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
OATH OF OFFICE:
Mayor Krause introduced Betty Launer, member of
LT. DENNIS AMBER
Fire and Police Commission and Fire Chief Edward
Cavello for the purpose of administering the Oath
of Office to -newly promoted Fire Lt. Dennis Amber.
Also in the audience were members of Lions Park
School Boy Scout Troop 154, who were attending the
Board meeting as one step closer to receiving their
Citizenship Badge.
MAYOR'S REPORT
No report.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 66-A-88
ZBA 66-A-88, Text Amendments
Text Amendments
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
AMEND CH.14
would amend various Sections of Chapter 14, Zoning,
relative to the size of garages in residential
districts; impervious surface coverage; setbacks for
parking in commercial districts; satellite dishes
in B-3 and B-4 districts; excluding specified uses
in I-1 districts; permitting day-care as a Special
Use in B-1, B-3 and B-4 districts; and, driveway
width of 15 feet for a one -car garage in a
residential district. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended approving these amendments by a vote of
6-1.
There was discussion as to the proposal for a 30
foot front yard setback for businesses, noting that
it appears to be a severe restriction on businesses,
especially in areas with limited lot size. It was
noted that the parking amendments approved a few
months ago provided for a 30 foot setback for
parking and the proposal establishes the same
setback for buildings. The consensus of opinion
regarding this subject was that the staff and Board
would monitor the requests with the possibility of
taking another look at this subject at a future
date.
ORD.NO. 4027 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,
moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4027
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS
OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon rollcall: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - February 21, 1989
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that AMEND CH. 21
Would amend Chapter 21 to increase the permitted
height of a fence in a residential district from five
feet to 6 feet.
Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane, expressed
his Opposition to this proposal.
Staff noted that 20% of the cases heard by the Zoning
Board of Appeals are requests for 6 foot high fences
and it is their suggestion that the height be
increased.
There was discussion among the members of the Board
noting that many lots in the Village are only 50 feet
wide and the image of 6 foot high fences throughout an
area would seem to be unsightly.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4028
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21.601 OF CHAPTER
21 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: None
Nays: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Motion failed.
ZBA 8-V-89, The Alter Group - Lake Center Plaza
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant specified variations for the development
of the light industrial park known as Lake Center
Plaza. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these variations, which had been approved
last year, however the one year effective period had
expired and the Petitioner was required to re -apply.
This Ordinance will be presented March 7th for
second reading.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 1-V-89, 1613 Rosetree
At the request of the Petitioner, this case will
be heard by the Village Board at the next meeting
on March 7th.
ZBA 3-A-89 and ZBA 4-V-89, 420 West Dempster
Dempster Development Center
The Petitioner is requesting text amendments
to change the parking space requirements from 10
per thousand square feet of floor area to 5 for
specified uses; to create a parking requirement
for outdoor swimming pools of one space per 75 square
feet of water area; and, to allow a maximum building
height of 38 feet for a gymnasium building instead of
the permitted 24 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by votes of 7-0.
Steve Durlacher, representing the Mount Prospect Park
District, stated that these variations are being
requested in order to construct the new development
center on the existing location. It was explained
that the new $8,500,000 facility will have
approximately 85,000 square feet and will be located
on the 17 acre parcel.
,Page 3 - February 21, 1989
ZBA 8-V-89
LAKE CENTER
PLAZA
ZBA I -V-89
1613 ROSETREE
ZBA 3-A-89
ZBA 4-V-8,9
DEMPSTER
DEVELOPMENT
CENTER
420 DEMPSTER
The existing Code regulations do not address this type
of use and therefore it was the recommendation of
staff to request a text amendment relative to the
parking requirements. Mr. Durlacher explained that a
portion of the building will have a height of 38 feet
to accommodate an area above the gymnasium.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals I and grant the text amendments requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variation requested.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Ordinances will be presented for first readings on
March 7th.
ZBA 5-Z, 6 -SU, ZBA 5-Z-89, ZBA 6 -SU -89, ZBA 7-V-89, 1796 South
7-V-89 Elmhurst Road
1796 E114HURST RD The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from B-3 to
B-4, which is required in order to operate a drive-
thru restaurant, a Special Use for a drive-thru
operation, and variations to allow a zero foot parking
lot setback from the south property line, which abuts
• service station, instead of the required 10 feet and
• zero foot parking lot setback from Elmhurst Road,
instead of the required 30 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests.
It was noted that the Petitioner intends to operate a
Mr. Beef fast-food restaurant at this location, which
was formerly the Waterfall and Kallens Restaurant.
A drive-thru facility is permitted under a Special Use
permit in a B-4 district only, therefore the
Petitioner is requesting B-4 zoning. Also requested
are variations to reduce the setbacks for the front
and side yards in order to provide for existing
parking and the drive-thru window.
It was noted that of the 6,800 square foot facility,
approximately 5,000 sq. ft. will be utilized for food
preparation and consumption and the remaining 1,800
sq.ft. will be utilized as a video store.
Members of the Village expressed concern relative to
granting B-4 zoning due to the fact that in the event
the proposed use failed any use permitted under a B-4
zoning classification could begin operation. It was
determined by the Board that should this property
cease operation as a restaurant use the Board would
consider directing the appropriate Board and/or
commission to review the zoning with the possibility
of re -zoning to a different classification.
Page 4 - February 21, 1989
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee��Arthur),�moved to
concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals and te-zOne the
subject property with a Special Use permit in order to
operate a drive-thru facility, being the subject of
ZBA 5-Z-89 and ZBA 6 -SU -89.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur,
Van Geem,
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Wattenberg
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
concur With the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variations being the subject
of ZBA 7-V-89.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Ordinances will be presented for first reading at the
March 7th meeting of the Village Board.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
proposals for conducting the annual audit for the
Village. There was discussion at the last meeting
relative to the recommendations and concerns. The
Finance Commission has since had an opportunity to
review the proposals and staff's recommendations and
it Is their suggestion that the Village retain
Karrison & Byrne for the upcoming audit on a one
year basis and after receiving the management letter
the subject should be reviewed and discussed again
next year SO to whether a different auditor should
be retained.
Trustee Farley suggested that a Policy be established
whereby the Village changes auditors following a
specified period of time, Possibly every five years.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Finance
Commission and accept the proposal of Karrison &
Byrne to conduct the annual audit of the Village on
a one year basis.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: Farley
Motion carried.
Mr. Dixon presented a proposal for fixed asset
inventory and appraisal.
The proposals received are as follows:
Bidder
American Appraisal
Fidelity Appraisal
Valuation Counselors
Inventory &
Annual
Appraisal
Update
$ 4,550
$ 400
$19,100
$1,890
$25,400
$ 750
Page 5 - February 21, 1989
AUDITOR
KARRISON
& BYRNE
FIXED ASSET
It was noted that the initial inventory and appraisal
will cost $4,550, however should additional work be
necessary an additional amount of not to exceed $3,500
would be charged.
AMERICAN Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Farley,
APPRAISAL moved to accept the proposal of American Appraisal
to conduct an inventory and appraisal of fixed assets
of the Village at a total cost not to exceed $8,050.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CATCH BASIN Village Manager Dixon presented a request to increase
INLET REPAIR the contract amount with Arrow Road Construction for
catch basin and inlet repairs. The original contract
ARROW ROAD CONST. was for $30,971.02, with the cost shared between the
Village ($13,324.86) and the Illinois Department of
Transportation ($17,647.16). While performing the
repairs it was determined that additional work was
needed on one inlet resulting in an additional cost of
$4,875.58. The State has agreed to pay their
proportionate share of this additional amount.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to authorize an increase in the contract with Arrow
Road Construction for catch basin and inlet repair
from $30,971.02 to $35,846.60.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ANY OTHM BUSINESS
REESE'S PLAT The Reeesle Plat of Subdivision was presented. This
divides one large lot of record into 2 lots for the
purpose of building 2 single family homes. The Plan
Commission has reviewed this subdivision and
recommends approval.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest her
signature on the Reese's Plat of Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved
to adjourn the meeting
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:37 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 6 - February 21, 1989
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
February 28, 1989
Cash & Invest.
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest.
Balance
2/17 Through
Per Attached Journal
Balance
2/16/89
2/28/89
List of Bills -,-Entry
2/28/89
General & Seecial Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
$ 1,261,041
$ 614,833
$415,512
$ 1,460,362
Community Development Block Grant Fund
580,968
3,326
1,612
12,000
15,264
10,961
567,316
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
103
33,846
12,285
4,365
21,664
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
2,195,185
207,642
323,584
2,079,243
199,264
10,457
971
208,750
Risk Management Fund
1,246,967
125,313
32,382
1,339,898
Capital Projects
P W Facility Const. Fund A
-
_
P W Facility Const. Fund Series B
70,510
-
1,244
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
773,188
26,940
46,477
69,266
753,651
Special Service Area Const. #5
141,975
81,056
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
223,031
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
472,907
209
344
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
208,080
-
472,772
-
208,080
Debt Service Funds
918,252
67,946
-
986,198
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
2,150
3,200
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
1,151,928
20,621
22,240
5,350
1,150,309
Firemen's Pension Fund
13,264,826
15,323,294
12,236
11,694
30,989
28,747
13,24 073
Benefit Trust Funds
31359
-
15,306,241
-
3,359
$37.817.323
1 229 605
941 000$38.105.928
PAGE 1
TUTAL
1100.00
$75.00
150.00
1100.00
14U.00
$2`0.00
a
53979 343.25s-
a
s
t
s
f15r531.30a
$79009.75
$75.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/89
VENDOR
PURCHASF DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ASC PLUMBING
BOND REFUND C411i
$100.00
ADVERTISING PRODUCTS INC.
HONG REFUND u949
ARNOLD SE;�Ek
HONG REFUND C4777
$75.00
BtTTEk BUILT LUMBER CO
BONO REFUND C0143
b>0.00
SALVAfORE CAN ALE
VEH STICKER REFUND
3100.00
CORPORATE SIGN SYSTEMS
BOND REFUND 0971
%40.00
5125.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
HONG REFUND 0970
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 2/._3/89
$125.00
$3650306.41
PAYROLL PERI00 ENDING 2/23/89
$1;270.16
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 2/23/89
&599.38
FIRST NATIONAL. HANK OF MT. PROSPECT
PAYRULL PERI00 ENDING /13/89
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF
S309I6T.30
2/16/89
S10060.01
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 2/16/89
$358.08
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 2123
195.39
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 2/23
145.01
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 2/23
$29265.56
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 2/23
$482.12
GkAHAM OIL COMPANY
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 2/23
&119225.13
HAKBkO CONSTRUCTION
FUEL
BOND REFUND 01947
579009.75
HOFFMAN GROUP
BOND REFUND 02040
&75.00
BOND REFUND C2040
$100.00
&3x810.00
BOND REFUND C2053
S3x710.00
BOND REFUND 02053
$100.00
BOND REFUND 02038
639810.00
BOND REFUND C2038
$100.00
BOND REFUND C2436
&10580.00
BOND REFUND C2436
%100.00
BOND REFUND 02609
550.00
BOND REFUND 02609
5200.00
BOND REFUND 02648
$860.00
BOND REFUND C2648
&100.00
BOND REFUND C3419
f25.00
BOND REFUND 03419
$200.00
BOND REFUND 02445
5360.00
BOND REFUND C2445
575.00
PAGE 1
TUTAL
1100.00
$75.00
150.00
1100.00
14U.00
$2`0.00
a
53979 343.25s-
a
s
t
s
f15r531.30a
$79009.75
$75.00
VFNOUR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
KLB WRECKING LTU.
KUt ,4IG L STREY REAL ESTATE
W. LINOAHL
JOSEPHINE LUOWIG
MANNES CONSTRUCTION
OPUS
YOGEFH PAREKH
PENSION DISbURSEMENTS
R/C CONSTRUCTION CO.
RUOTBUSTERS
SAFc-GUARO CO. INC.
J. SHIMASUKU
SIGNCkAFTERS
STEKLING GENERAL CORP.
VICTOR STRAMA:.LIO
RICHAk4 TUFANO
VINCENT SIGN SERVICE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOU.JT PROSPECT
ACCOJPITS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/89
PWRCHASt DESCRIPTItIN
BOND REFUNO CZ436
BOND REFUND C243u
BOND REFUND L3211
80NO REFUND 03211
BOND REFUND C3646
XEFUhD FINAL WATER BILL
BOND REFUND 02195
BOND REFUND C3583
BOND RtFUN_) 02679
BONO REFUND C4829
kEFUNO FINAL WATER BILL
FEB POLICE PENSION DISB
FEU FIRE PENSION DISB
BOND RErUND C2915
BONO REFUND C3007
BOND REFUND C3956
BOND REFUND 04610
BOND REFUND 0959
BOND REFUND C478U
BOND REF UNJ L2376
BOND REFUND C4758
BOND REFUND 0963
REINSPECTION FEE CZ609
REINSPECTION FEE 0949
REINSPECTION FEF 0523
REINSPECTION FEE 0511
REINSPECTION FEE 0510
kEINSPECTION FEE C4777
REINSPECTION FEE C4758
REINSPECTION FEE C2370
REINSPECTION FEE C3007
REINSPECTION FEE C2915
REINSPECTION FEE C2679
REINSPECTION FEE C1947
RCINSPLCTION FEE 02438
REINSPECTION FEE C2445
INVOICE AMOUNT
$2,560.00
$75.00
$200.00
X100.00
1500.00
sIZ6.50
i1u0.00
$100.00
s50.00
stu0.00
$20. 7U
$,300968.84
SZ 89 747.05
$50. OL)
$50.Ou
$100.00
$500.00
$100.00
8500.00
$50.00
$35.OU
s100.OU
$50.00
S25.00
s100.00
$100.00
$100.00
$50.00
$15.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$50.00
$2 5.OU
$25.00
625.00
PAGE
TOT AL
sl8v 115.00
$50U.Ou
$126.50
S100.00
S10u.00
$56.00
slUJ.00
6Z0.70
;599735.89*
$50.00
$50.00
$100.00
5500.00
$100.00
$500.ou
s5U.00
$35.00
$10U.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2I26189
VENOUR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
FRED WERTYMER
REINSPECTION FEE
C3419
$75.00
$790.00
BIAi1CA WRIGHT
BOND RLFO NU 0419
8250.00
5250.00
BOND REFUND 0964
$100.00
SLO0.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$502#U47.39
GENERAL FU14D
$37s. LLj6. i6
COMMUNITY DtVLPMT BLOCK
GRANT
S1t365.5',
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$12.2-j5.14
WATFR E SEWER FUND
S32r580.0E
PARKING SYSTrM RtVENUE FUND
$644.39
POLICE PENSIUN FUND
$30#988.d4
FIREMEN*S PLNSION FUND
$tri:741.05
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
522.240.00
##II##II###IIaII#,xa#u#*##II*aaa#*aIIaa##a##aaaIIaaaaoaaa#a#a*##aaaa#a#a#aa*#aaaaaara*as�a*asa*#a*a*a*ax��x#a#*#aa*
PUBLIC REPRESENTATIUN DIVISION
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY AIKFARES
SCHWEPPE 6 SONS COFFtE
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND $434.80
$386.00 $386.00
$48.80 $48.80
***TOTAL** $434.80
#*II####II#####IIII#**##*#IIIIa#**##*#######IIIIIIII###II#####aaaa#IIaIIII#II*IIII*II##IIII*II*#*a*IIII#**#II*II*##IIIIIIIIIIa#II3#IIIIII#
VILLAGE MANAGER45 OFFICE
BURKE AND RYAN LEGAL SERVICES— DEC# JAN $1#929.44 $1#429.44
ICMA REGISTRATION 155.00 555.00
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE TUITION $70.00 170.00
NURTHWFST STATIONERS INC. UFFILE SUPPLIES
$40.09
UFFICE SUPPLIES $26.68 $66.77
VENOUR
VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
THOMPSON PUBLISHING GROUP
VILLAGE MANAGEROS OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL RLPURI
PAYMENT DATE 2/26/89
PUkCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES• MEETING E TRAVEL
.iUBSCRIP TION
$29295.72
PAGE 4
INVOICE AMUU�4T TUT AL
$11.51 $11.51#
5163.00 $163. UO
***TOTAL** $2.295.72
BECKLEY-CARRY COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$356.69
$356.69
CABLEVISION
SUBSCRIPTION
$55.00
S55.UO
EDWARD FRANCE
PAID VOLUNTEER
$25.00
$25.00
N.F.L.C.P.
HANDBOOK
$30.OU
$30.00
DEBBIE RAJCZYK
PAID VOLUNTEER
$25.00
$25.00
JERRY RAJCZYK
PAID VOLUNTEER
$25.00
$25.00
A.A. SWIFT PRINT• INC.
PRINT NEWSLETTER
i299.0u
5299.00
HOWARD WILSON
SIGNS
$30.00
POSTERS
$30.00
360.00
CABLE TV OPERATIUNS
*##TOTAL##
$875.69
GENERAL FUND $J75.69
##Ya*#***##*#*###*##***#*******#*#*******a**#**##***********#*s**u*#*#*a***#*##*****#*##*a**#ate**#****s#
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
DECISION DATA SEktVICE INC. MAINZ -MARCH 571.00 $71.00
THE DRAWING SUARU#INC. OFFILE jUPPLIES $62.61 $62.61
ELMAR OFFICE SUPPLY OFFICE FURN $256.20 $156.20
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/"28189
VENDIJR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ICMA PUdLICAT ION
LOKL 6USINESS PRODUCTS E OFFICE SUPN DISKETTES
NURTH,4EST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE REGIiTRHTIJN
PUNLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFILE SUPPLIES
OFFILE SUPPLIES
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE OELIVE,(Y
SYSTEMS FORMS, INC. LICF;gStS
LICENSES
LICENSES
XEROX CORP. MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
MONTHLY CHARGES FOR 1090 COPIER
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND $o,b86.11
PAGE 5
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$32.70
$32.70
$5T.OU
$57.U0
$170.00
$170.00
$146.81
NEWSLETTER
$311.44
$19613.19
$86.69
$544.94
$18.70
$18.70
$3,031.47
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$741.92
$37.90
$55.54
$3d1.03
$4#204.42
$201.38
$125.12
$11067.16
$1#268.54
***TOTAL**
$6.086.11
GENERAL FUND
$5x734.65
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
R.T. JENKINS
NEWSLETTER
$19613.19
$19613.19
MICROAGE COMPUTER STORES
CARTptIOGES
$37.90
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$55.54
$37.90
$55.54
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICES
$125.12
$125.12
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER
$1#982.40
$1#982.40#
A.A. SWIFT PRINT, INC.
PRINT NEWSLETTER
$19920.50
S19920.50
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
*##TOTAL*#
$59734.65
GENERAL FUND
$5x734.65
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2!28!89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
ISK MANAGEMENT
iMO ILLINOIS
HEALTH INS - MARCH
JACKSON• LONG E ASSOCIATES• INC.
FEES -JA', E FEB
JACKSON. LONG E ASSOCIATES
JACKSON LONG FEB 15-21
iAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE
REPAIRS
31.729.25
REPAIRS
iORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SERVICES RENDERED
3135.05
SERVICES RENDERED
31032.8£
7001004195-X
ORTHNEST ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY* S.C.
REIMBURSEMENT
$585.03
REIMBURSEMENT
_,HAEL T. SCHMIOT
REIMBURSEMENT
TATE TREASURER#EX-UFFICTU CUSTODIAN
2ND INJURY FUND ASSMT
>TATF TREASURER* EX -OFFICIO COSTODIA
RATE AOJ' FUND ASSMT
ISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$32#341.87
PAGE b
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$4,841.34
$4,841.34
37*098.74
$79096.74*
$159663.33
$15*663.33*
x270.05
$85.00
31.729.25
S19999.3C
$193.0u
a
3135.05
31032.8£
$1#860.91
$173.00
$585.03
$758.00
599.07
599.07
$49.24
$49.24
511.94
$11.94
***TOTAL**:
$32# 381.87
xs�:aaaa#aa�aaas�sasa#aasxaaaaaaaat�aaaaaaaa�aaaaaeosaaaaaa�z�aaaaaaz:a#a�aaaaraaaaava�s�a�aaasaaw�faa�aaascasaaar
INSPECTION SERVICES
C H INDUSTRIES
IDELITY PRODUCTS CO.
'i JAKES
.41HWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
WILL CORPORATION
,ENTINEL COMPUTER SERVICES INC.
ERJX CORP.
SUPPLIES
TUBE CABINET
EXPENSES
TUITION
OFFICE SUPPLIES
SERVICE
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
OFFICE SUPPLIES
io6.24
36o.24
$775.7U
$775.70
$281.00
$281.00
$85.00
$85.00
$309.07
$309.07
$246.75
3248.75
5201.39
$125.20
$320.59
NSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL** E2*(192.35
GENERAL FUND SS996b.58
VILLAGE ilF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28189
VENDJR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICiE AMOUNT
TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
SZTU92.35
POLICL DEPARTMENT
AAA TRAVEL A LNLY
AIR rARi=
$323.00
$323.00
AM I THE ONLY ONE
BOOKLETS
5.5.00
S25.UO
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$217.25
$217.25
THE CHICAGO DAILY DEFENDER
AD
$97.20
$97.26
CMI* INC.
SUPPLIES
318.05
$18.05
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
OH66-JT-5422-A
$15.88
515.811
TME CUNSTABLE EQUIPMENT CO.
SUPPLIcS
$323.50
$323.50
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$88.93
$88.93
FREDRIKSEN E SONS
SERVICES RENDERED
594.OU
$94.00
GRAU-HALL CORPURATIUN
SUPPLIES
$226.78
$226.78
H R HART PHOTO
FILM PROCESS
554.87
$54.87
HEWLETT PACKARD
MAINT AGRMI
S7t.40
371.40
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
253-2151
$138.51
KALE UNIFORMS
CO3-527)
SHOES
535.72
5174.23
LEARNKEV
VIDEO TAPES
560.90
560.90
LUKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS L UFFICE SUPP
SUPPLIES
$84.95
$181.44
584.95
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO PARTS
SUPPLIES
JAN INVOICES
$19.25
$733.63
3200.69
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAINING
TUITION
350.00
$733.63
NORtHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$79.87
$50.00
$79.87
RIPP PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
$69.95
$69.95
THE SIGN CENTER, INC.
SIGNS
$908.50
$908.50
TRI -R SIGNS, INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
350.00
$50.00
PULICL DEPARTMENT
"*TOTAL**
$3v968.58
GENERAL FUND SS996b.58
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FIRE E EMEkGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ARLINGTON HTS. FINE ACADEMY
REGI�TkATION
ASTRAL ELECTRONICSw INC.
REPAIR
BOWMAN UISTRIttUTION CENTER
SUPPLIES
$470.94
SUPPLIcS
$46.85
SUPPLIES
BROLK TOOL LOMPA:NY
SUPPLIcS
COMMOoiWEALTH EDISON
13A77 -JT -2404-A
CONRAU AND SON
EQUIP
$374.00
TOOLS
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
OFFICE SUPPLIES
KEITH DESTREE
EXPENSES
STEVEN DUMOVICH
EXPENScS
$270.00
EXPENSES
$652.50
EXPENSES
FALCON FASTENERS INC.
EQUIP
FIRE ENGINEERING
SUBSCRIPTION
FIkE INVESTIGATORS STRIKE FORCE
MEMBtRaHIP
JAMES FLORY - F.D.
EXPENSES
H k HART PHOTO
PHOT) SUPPLIES
ILLINOIS SELL TELEPHONE CO.
CO3-5279
$415.36
253-Z141
528.43
398-6389
SZ3.14
593-0959
$197.98
CO3-U100
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS ASSOCIATION
REGISTRATION
$150.00
REGISTRATION
R. KOkOECKI
EXPENSES
KREST UNIFORMSo INC.
UNIFUkMS
LUKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS L OFFICE SUPP
SUPPLIcS
$78.16
UFFILE SUPPLIES
JOHN MALCOLM - F.D.
EXPENSES
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
HED SUPPLIES
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS E SONS
RIBBONS
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
TRAI%IN+; SESSIONS -JAN
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
SUPPLIES♦ MEETING E TRAVEL
PAGE 8
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$11050.00
51V050.00
$77.95
$77.95
$463.11
$470.94
$46.85
598u.90
$211.30
5221.30
$8.32
$8.32
5 815.00
$374.00
$19199.00
$08.92
588.91
$291.45
5291.,x5
$485.00
$270.00
$652.50
SLr407.50
$105.84
$105.84
$56.85
$56.85
$25.00
$25.00
$20.00
$20.00
5103.17
$103.17
$35.72
$415.36
528.43
SZ3.14
$197.98
$700.63
$150.OU
$150.00
$300.00
$50.00
$50.00
$115.57
$115.57
$19.25
$78.16
597.41
$20.00
520.00
$1$1.23
Slil.13
$50.00
$50.00
$210.00
$210.00
ilOt.00
5107.00
$38.64
#
V E NOOR
FIRE G EMERGENCY PRUTECTION DEPT.
SECRETARY OF STATE
DENNIS THILL - F.D.
ZEP MANUFACTURING COMPANY
FIP.E E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES# MEETING 6 TRAVEL
SUPPLIESe MEETING f. TRAVEL
SUPPLIESe MEETING 6 TRAVEL
SUPPLIES# MEETING 1: TRAVEL
SUPPLIES• MEETING 6 TRAVEL
SUPPLIES# 1-1EETING C TRAVEL
SUPPLIES# MEETING G TRAVEL
SUPPLIES# MEETING E TRAVEL
SUPPLIES• MEETING E TRAVEL
SUPPLIES# MEETING E TRAVEL
TITLE REGISTRATION
EXPENSES
SUPPLItS
INVOICc AMOUNT
512.74
14. 5u
513.95
520.10
545.76
1-2.41
1,4.98
1-8.00
$20.38
$20.60
$3.00
5129.55
$143.80
***TOTAL**
549854.86 CAPITAL IMPRV. C REPL. FUND
AMERICAN
PLANNING ASSOCIATION
SERVICE FEE
KENNETH H. FRITZ
EXPENSES
ILLINUIS
PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL
80XMUOU PROGRAM
KEEFER'S
PHARMACY
FILM
NATIONAL
JEVELOPMtNT COUNCIL
REGISTRATION
NORTHWEST
HEATING G AIR CONDITIONING
CDBG
OUTLINE
5283.00
DISPLAY SYS
PADDOCK PUBLICATIUNS
INC
LEGAL WTICES
PLANNING
RESOURCES
SERVICES RENDERED
REI TITLE
SERVICES
SERVICES RENDERED
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PAGE v
TOTAL
#
#
#
#
#
#
#
S19z.06x-
33.00#
$129.55
$143.80
571856.45
$3#001.59
$385.00
3385.00
$748.00
ST48.00
55#500.00
559500.00
$10.0.4
S1u.08
$545.00
$595.00
$3#635.00
53#635.00#
$778.00
5778.00
5177.45
$171.45
$364.00
$364.00
5283.00
5283.00
###TOTAL## 512#475.53
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE LU
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL RcPUKI
PAYMENT DATE 2/28189
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUN!) $29830.08 COMMUNITY DEVLP4T BLOCK GRANT $99595.45
aaa��rc$rY�ttt��z�a�a��s�+asaa+aaaa�aa�araa�a�rYv$�t���a���t���tc�r$aa$ra�Ys��aes��ac$�av�u��sxz#a����a�aa���a�aa��
STREET DIVISION
AMERILAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES• INC.
EQUIPMENT
$291.88
6291.88
AMERICAN HOTEL REGISTER COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$27.95
TASLtS
$307.96
$335.91
AMERICAN INTERTOOL9 INC.
TOULN
Sb4.74
364.74 -
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
SERVICE CALL
$57.00
$57.00
ASBESTOS CONTROL METHODS• INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$200.00
3200.00
A WORLD OF PLASTIC* LTO.
SUPPLIES
$37.12
$37.12
CAGE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$319.50
SUPPLIES
311. 1.35
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$333.70
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$333.70
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$333.7U
SUPPLIES
$163.25
SUPPLIES
$103.25
SUPPLIES
$163.25
SUPPLIES
$163.25
329074.95
CHEM KITE: PRUUUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$128.20
$128.20
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM RENTAL
$92.06
UNIFORM RENTAL
$90.62
$182.68
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BF60-JT-t7U06
$311.61
$321.61
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
CLEANING SERV
$19976.00
$10976.00
CONRAD AND SON
EQUIPMENT
$383.20
SUPPLILS
$163.50
SUPPLIES
$34.43
$581.13
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLINOIS
02-14-146-02
$69.67
$69.67
DOMTAR INDUSTRIES* INC.
ROAD SALT
$99327.30
ROAD SALT
$50936.53
$159263.83
DUO -FAST
TOOL
$140.00
$140.00
FOX VALLEY SYSTEMS9 INC
SUPPLIES
$26.50
SUPPLIES
$59.02
$85.52
VILLAGE OF MOUnT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 21[8189
VENDOR PURCHASE DESLKIPTION INVOICt AMOUNT
STREET DIVISION
GALAXY INDUSTRIES, INC.
DRILL LITS
$22.08
GARVIN GARDENS
SERViCtS RENDERED
s10.OG
GILCO SCAFFOLDING COMPANY
k[NTAL
GGO THERMAL SUPPLY COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$40.OU
$59.96
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
1133.50
'�1WARU HINES LUMBER CO.
]
SUPPLIES
$14.48
SUPPLIES
$59.88
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK G EQUIPMENT C OMPA
PARTS
$1,427.36
ILLINOIS IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC.
TOOLS
$25.95
ILLINOIS LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS ASSN.
REGISTR.ATIUN
$40.00
KINDER INUUSTRIAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
518.42
ARMOND 0. KING, INC.
APPRAISAL
s1,2u0.00
LAKE LANDFILL
LOOSE YARDS
$159.60
MIDWEST SOLAR CONTROL CORPORATION
REPAIRS
$738.00
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO PARTS
JAN INVOICES
$70.20
JAN INVOICES
$41.28
NATIONAL ARBOR JAY FOUNDATION
MEMBERSHIP
$20.00
MEMBEkSHIP
110.00
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SEVICES
W ARTERLY FEE
$25.00
NELSON EQUIPMENT CO.
PARTS G SERVICE
$105.00
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
SUPPLIES, MEETING
E IRA -VEL
$52.83
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
624.88
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
611.25
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$1.25
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$21.54
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$37.18
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$34.24
PETROLANE GAS SERVICE
FUEL
PkUSAFETY
SUPPLIES
$10.00
ROWLAND•S EQUIPMENT, INC.
SUPPLIES
$9.90
662.30
SEARS, ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
TOOLS
143.98
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
SERVICE FOR DEC G
FEB
$74.17
SERVICE FOR DEC G
FEB
$74.17
SERVICE FOR DEC G
FEB
$74.17
SERVICE FOR DEC G
FEB
$74.17
SERVICE FOR DEC G
FEB
674.17
PAGE 11
TOTAL
$22.08
110.00
$40.U0
$50.96
$133.50
$74..36
$1,421.Se
$25.95
140.00*
$18.42
$1,200.00
$159.60
$738.00
$111.48
$30.00
$25.00
$105.00
652.83*
$
*
s
$130.34*
f10.00
$9.90
162.30
143.98
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128%89
VENDOR
PURLHASE DESCRIPTIOP
INVOICE AMOUNT
TUTAL
STREET DIVISION
SERVICE FOR DEC E FEB
$74.15
5445.u0
SNAP -UN TUULS CORPORATION
EQUIP
r2u1.03
EQUIP
$281.03
$562.06
STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC.
PLBG SUPPLIES
$213.89
$213.d9
P. R. STREICH
PARTS
5194.91
$194.91
JUN P. TILE
BOUNDARY SURVEY
519025.00
$19025.00
TIME SAVERS IAC.
SERVICE
$287.16
SERVICE CALL
$176.15
$463.31*
TOOLS UNLIMITED INC
TOOLS
5207.00
TOOLS
5159.00
$366.00
VENTURE STORE -ss INC.
SUPPLIES
$96.04
$96.04
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
SUPPLIES
5142.00
5142,00
ROBERT YIU CONSTRUCTIOM9 INC.
JAIL CELL RENOVATION
540#000.00
JAIL CELL RENOVATION
$19251.00
$419251.00
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$71#090.51
GENERAL FUNiL)
$129350.68 MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND $15*263.83
CAPITAL IMPRV. G REPL. FUND
$439476.00
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AMERICAN ARBURIST SUPPLIES# INC.
EQUIPMENT
$115.26
$115.26
AMERICAN PUBLIC WURKS ASSOC
REGISTRNTIUN
$20.0(}
$ZO.UO*
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
SERV CALL
$112.50
$112.50
B & H INDUSTRIES
DRAFTING SUPPLIES
$142.08
DRAFTING SUPPLIES
513.72
URAFTING SUPPLIES
556O.Ou
$735.80
BADGER METER INC
MATERIALS
$19250.30
S1#25U.3O
CAGE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$319.50
$.119.50
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
6342.20
$342.20
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM RENTAL
$92.05
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYAPLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE Z/26189
VENDOR r'UXCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATEK AND SEWER DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
UNIF,,RM RENTAL
tSJ60-Jf-23596
$90.62
$182.67
COMMONWEALTH EUISON
8672 -JT -5608-D
$69730.87
$69730.n7
$142.76
8872 -JT -3548-A
$14.24
CUNTINENTAL BANK
UH67-if-1310-A
UPER E
$47.90
$204.90
MAINT CU3TS-JAWA
$249671.00
VILLAGE: SHARE FIXED CUSTS-JAWA
$1699922.00
CONRAD AND SON
LAKE WATER PURCHASE-JAWA
$429958.00
$1779531.00$
CORAUTAN CORPURATIDN
SUPPLIcS
ADO ON WORK
$272.50
$272.50
ELH UTILITY SALES9 INC.
SUPPLIES
$608.60
$608.60
FLUID CONSERVATION SYSTEMS CORP.
PARTS
$125.15
$125.15
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
s215.00
$215.00
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
EQUIP
$330.54
$330.54
GREAT LAKES FIRc EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
$207.00
$207.u0
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER EXCH
$94.00
$593.75
$94.00
TEST E REPAIR
$433.03
HENSEY PRODUCTS I,YC.
TEST E 4EPAIR
SUPPLIES
$1.839.36
$Z091b.14
I.B.M. CORPORATION
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$406.02
$406.02
$19000.00
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$39500.OU
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
$49000.00
COMPJTE` EQUIPMENT
$169000.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
COMPUTER EQUIPMENT
CO3-0096
$1002.00
$269002.00
$152.25
253-8998
$18.15
394-5776
$15.53
95b-6910
$17.93
253-0198
$15.33
CO3-0120
$388.39
CO3-0717
3469.68
CO3-UbJ4
$25.68
CO3-0806
657.84
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK 6 EQUIPMENT LOMPA
CO3-uB03
PARTS
$30.63
$19211.42
ILLINOIS IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC.
TOOLS
$303.72
$363.72
624.69
$24.69
VENDJR
WATER AND SEWER 01VISION
ILLINOIS LAND:iCAPE CONTRACTORS ASSN.
INSITUFORM MIDWEST
ILLINOIS SAFETY CJUNCIL
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC.
MOTUROLA LELLULAR SERVICE INC
"FOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO PARTS
NATIONAL ARBORIST ASSOCIATION• INC.
NELSON EQUIPMENT CO.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORLAB
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PALATINE MELDING CO.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POSTMASTER
PRUSAFETY
RAINBUW I HR PHOTO EXP.
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY
STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC.
P. R. STREICH
DAN WLIR
Z11:3ELL WATER SERVICE PRUDUCTS• INC.
WATt:t AND SEWER olVISLON
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128/89
P"JRLHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REGISTKATION
sbs.00
$85.00*
SEWER CONTRACT
$6298[8.00
$629826.00
MEMHLkSH IP DUES
$50.00
150.00
CELLULA'( SERVICE - JAN
£42.42
$42.42
CELLJLAR SERV
$34.15
534.15
JAN INVOICES
$514.72
$514.12
WORKSHOP
$190.00
$190.00a
PARTS F SERVICE
5273.70
6273.70
112 E HIGHLAND AVE EMMERSON
$275.28
117 N WAVERLY
5164.02
1818 1/2 BONITA OR
$144.16
NS KENSINGTON IE RANO RD
$45.64
$609.10
SUPPLIES
S379.2U
$379.20
TUITION
$100.00
$100.00
FILE CABINET
$454.84
$454.84
SUPPLIES
$210.00
6210.00*
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
$14.05
sz
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$57.51
s
TRAVEL 6 SUPPLIES
$4.79
0
TRAVt_L 6 SUPPLIES
$5.00
0
TRAVEL L SUPPLIES
639.70
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$7.75
a
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
640.00
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$2.70
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$46.97
$228.470
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
$419.65
$419.b5
SUPPLIES
$9.90
$9.90
PHOT) SUPPLIES
$57.09
$57.09
PARTS
$19707.89
S19707.d9
SUPPLIES
$192.88
6192.88
PLBG SUPPLIES
636.00
$36.00
PARTS
$194.91
$19.1.91
SAFETY SHOES
650.OU
650.00
SUPPLIcS
$19829.74
SUPPLIES
6164. 70
sl#994.44
***TOTAL**
$2919004.14
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128189
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE 4MOUNT TOTAL
WATER G SEWER FUND $4919004.14
PARKING SYSTEM JIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISUN f6H66-JT-0498-A 320.98
f3HG6-JT-3710-A
RHb8- JT - 7498-A
BH66-3'T-5266-C
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WATER -RR STA
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
$8.40
$?0.98
$269.10 $319.46
$6.90 6b.90
###TOTAL#a $326.36
PARKING :iYSTEM REVENUE FUND $31$.36
a##aaaY##aa#a as aaaaaaraaaaaa#aaaa#aaasaaaaaa#aaaaa#aaaaaaaas##aaaaaaaaaaaaaaa#aaaaaraaaraa�Yxaaaaaa##aaa
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
13URKE AND RYAN LEGAL SERVICES- DEC9 JAN $343.75 $343.75
CUNRAU AND SON SUPPLIES 3508.89 $548.84
HENkICKSEN EDGING $735.00 $735.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $195137.64
DOWNTOWN RtnEVLPAT CJNST 1985 5343.75 P W FACILITY COAST 19ti7Ci $19243.39
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON 13G21 -JT -1838-A $11.74 $71.74
VILLAGt OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
COMMUNITY ANO CIVIC SERVICES
FULGERS FLAG C OFCORATING SUPPLIES 571.10
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL**
GENERAL FUND 6192.84
PAGE 16
TOTAL
i7i.10
$192.84
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL $9419000.63
DATE RUN 2/28/89
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
TlMc RUN 11.44.21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID—VAP155
SUMMARY BY FUND 2/26/89
NO.
FJND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$415#512.72
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
5159263.83
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK $RANT
$10#961.OU
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$12#295.14
41
WATER E SEWEk FUND
$323#544.20
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$970.75
49
RISK MANAGEME14T FUND
$329331.87
51
CAPITAL IMPKV. E REPL. FUND
$46#477.59
55
DOWNTOWN kEOEVLPMT CONST 1985
$343.75
5T
P W FACILITY LO NST 19878
$19243.89
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$30*938.84
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$28#747.05
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$22#240.00
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $941x000.63
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: FEBRUARY 28, 1989
SUBJECT: NEW OWNERSHIP
R LIQUOR LICENSE ESTABLISHMENT (FORMERLY KNOWN AS
SHOGUN RESTAURANT), 1176 S. ELMHURST ROAD
NOW KNOWN AS TFK, INC. D/B/A IZAKAYA SANKYU
P LIQUOR LICENSE REQUEST (FORMERLY CLASS V -
KYOTOYA CORPORATION --JAPAN FOOD & CRAFTS)
NOW KNOWN AS TFK, INC. D/B/A SHIMADA SHOTEN,
1182 S. ELMHURST ROAD
I met with the new officers of the new corporation who wish to operate the
business. None of the present owners have previously been connected with Shogun
Restaurant, however, the President and Vice President of the new corporation were
both equal partners at'Yasuke Restaurant at the Briarwood Shopping Center for the
past seven years. Both of these individuals also had been listed on the Yasuke
Liquor License.
The new owners are hopeful to open by the end of March and would ideally like to
see a first reading on March 7 and the second reading on March 21. The owners
are remodeling the inside of the restaurant to add tea rooms, however, the hours
of the operation will stay the same. They will try to have a menu ready for the
March 7 Board meeting, however, they indicated the menu would be traditional
Japanese.
In addition to Izakaya Sankyu, the owners would like to have the opportunity to
open Shimada Shoten, a Japanese food store. They wish to have considered a
Class P License for retail package of beer and wine only, with no consumption on
premises. The present owners of Kyotoya have had a retail V License, for wine
only, but this last year did not renew it because of lack of sales. The new owners
are suggesting that Japanese beer is what they will sell to their Japanese
customers and wish to have a P License to sell Japanese beer and wine.
JOHN FULTON DIXO�
JFD/rcw
V I L L A G 0 F MOUNT PRG rNECT
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
LOCAL L12UOR CONTROL COMMISSION
APPLICATION FOR RETAIL L12UOR DEALER'S LICENSE
RENEWAL DATE Te��LIJO%%,k
NEW X ($150 Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of new Liquor
License; one-time only fee)
Honorable Carolyn H. Krause, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known
as Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day
of January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale of alcoholic liquors in the Village of
Mount Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois:
The undersigned, TFK Inc„ d/b/a Izakaya Sankyu
hereby makes application for a Class K liquor dealer's license for theeriod
ending April 30, 19 89 , and tenders the sum of $ 2,000 + 5150.08 the
prescribed fee as set forth in the following:
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (Section 13.106):
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL.
Your petitioner, TFF Inc.
doing business as Izakaya Sankyu
respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at
1176 So. Elmhurst Rd, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Annual Fee
CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises
$ 2,500.00
CLA55 B: Consumption on premises only
2,000.00
CLASS C: Retail package only
2,000.00
CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only
750.00
CLASS E: Caterer's license
2,000.00
CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine,
consumption on premises only
750.00
CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment
2,000.00
CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises
2,500.00
CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non -
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises
1,750.00
CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only
2,000.00
CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge
2,500.00
CLASS T: Bowling Alley
2,500.00
CLASS V: Retail package - wine only
1,500.00
CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine
only and at dining tables only
1,500.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED
1,000.00
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL.
Your petitioner, TFF Inc.
doing business as Izakaya Sankyu
respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at
1176 So. Elmhurst Rd, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Description and Name of Premises: Izakaya Sankyu, 1176 So. Elmhurst Rd.,
mt. 'Prospect, 11, 6n056 see attached lease.
-TN—scription must be complete as to floor, frontage, etc.
Name of Owner of Premises:- LaSalle National Bank, u/t 42301
If Owner of record is a land trustee, attach copy of Land Trust Agreementletter-See attached Tr—om .
If not Owner, does /aglicant have a lease? Yes State date applicant's
lease expires: 1/31 not owner, attach copy of lease hereto. Copy attached
Is applicant an individual, a corporation a co -partnership, or an association? (Circle one)
If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number
and Social Security Number:
If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number
and Social Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits
thereof:
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: Illinois, 12/28/88
If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois,
indicate date qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact
business in Illinois! "T /A
If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers,
and Social Security Numbers of officers and directors. Also list the names,
addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders
owning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such - corporation.
NAME
Futriyasu Yoshida
Date of Birth: 11/17/51_
Tadashi, Shimabuku
Date of Birth: 3/5/51
Harumi Yoshida
Date of Birth: 11/19/5C_
Linda L. Sbimabuku
ADDRESS
177$ Syracuse Lane
Schaumburg, 11, 6()103
OFFICE AND/OR
PERCENT OF
STOCK HELD
President/Director/4(`
Social Security # 352-58-8241 Phone # 893-56413
2082 Park View Circf—eEast
'Roffman rsta,tes, IL 60194 VP/Pire,ctor/40'
SOCILi Security # 354-60-3752
I E-
720 Syracuse ane
Schaumburg, IL 60103
7
Social Security # 120-60-521)('
208' Park Vi-e-w-77-r-cre---last
Yoffnan 'Fstates, IL 6n194
Phone # 490-1938
Treasurer/ -O -'
Phone # 803-5643
Secretary/ -0
Date of Birth.5/5/50 Social Security # 236-98-263() Phone # 490-1938
See further --17n �®rma�tionl attached, -y or a 11 lawful businesses for
Mjects for which organization is formed: an
corporatTo-ins.
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the
applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents,
or stockholders ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? „70,
If so, explain-
If applicant is an individual, state ageMarital Status:
Is applicant s citizen of the United States? !T/& If a naturalized citizen,
state date and place of naturalization: ----
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect continuously next
prior to the fiUn8 c� thiu application? Sioce January� I989
I�76 3o. Ylmborst
Local 8ddreua;l`t. Prospect, TL 60n56 Telephone No. 228-5539
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: �Tew corporation -
no prior business
State amount of goods wares and merchandise on hand at ,his time: P2505 .50
How long has applicant been in this business?
Is the applicantan elected public official? If so, state the
particulars thereof: ---'
Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business
an elected public official
In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the
applicant made any political contributions within the past % years? t"«
If so, state the particulars thereof: 'K7/A
Does the applicant hold any la* enforcement office? N/A If so designate
title:---- `
Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device
Stamp? No If so, state the reasons therefor:
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by
any of subsections (a) (3) through (a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as
prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore
or hereafter amended? No If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other
license on premises other than described in this application?, �To
state disposition of such application:---- ,
Is applicant qualified to receive state and federal Ucenae no operate an
alcoholic liquor business? veo Has applicant ever had -' previouss licensee
revoked by the federal government or by any state or subdivision thcreof7
rp If so, explain:
Is applicant disqoa���d to receive a license by reason of any matter or
thing construed by *his Ordinance, the laws of this state or other
Ordinances of this YU]agc
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws nfthe State of Illinois,
the United States ofAmerica, orany of the Ordinances ofthe Village of
Mount Prospect in the conduct of his place of business? Yes
Does applicant currently carry Dram Shop Insurance coverage? If "Yes"
attach COPY- Will be submitted prior to application approval, "
If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry
Dram Shop Insurance coverage? (If the answer to either of the foregoing
questions is "No," no Uccnoc shall -issue.) Will be covered by submitted
Certificate of Insurance, prior to application approvaI
Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application a'~ the
time of tibn8?---__ ITi1I be submitted prior to application approval.
State name and address of each surety next below:
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security
Number of manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application
is made: Tadashi Shirriabuku. 2082 Park View Circle East, Hoffman Estates,
IL 60194; DOE 3/5/51; (312)490-1938; SS# 354-60-3752,
TFK Inc., d/b/a
Sr.ada Sb
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT -',
by. umiya y
Presid nt
Corporate Seal
(if applicant is corporation)
Who first �eijn d t worn, under oath deposes and says that he
0�y is*m
th(� r e r8ense requested in the foregoing application; that
he is/zy&)of good repute, character and standing, and that answers to
the questions asked in the foregoing application are true and correct in
every detail.
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) SS.
COUNTY OF COOK )
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this .1\S.-`' day of A.D., 19 89
144
Notary Pu
liC
CAL
VAL
STAIN or jUj"jS
tom'. AUG. 14.t"2
APPLICATION APPROVED:
Local Liquor Control Commissioner
.
-
0a corporation, givenanes' -a-o-o-r-e»-se'»—" dates of -t-e-/�-~-~-�~--=-
numbers,
and
umberw'and Social Security Numbers of officers and directors. Also list the na e
-y'addreuwes, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholderspwning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such. corporation.
-
`-
----
NAME
Kunio Iwadate
Dame of Birth: 6/25/55
maoaaki Hivama
Date of Birth
ADDRESS
TI'lCrest Avenue
Flk �7rove Village, IL 7
Social Security # 324 64 --
306.22-2 is
�
G Cbome Edo ----SOcli-1 Security # None
Date of Birth:
Social Security #
)ate of Birth: ---------
^ Social Security #
m
OFFICE AND/or
PERCENT OF
'
STOCK HELD
Phone #9PI-A53I
I0� �
'
Phone # 03-675-43I8
�
Phone # �
Phone #
it, ssaursnq jonbri HR4aj e alejado of uoTssTwiad sisanbaj Allnji3adsaj
Ua
:40AS ePeu1TqS se ssauisnq Surop
Dui -AIL '-JQuoii!iad inok
*11'ddV 20 kV(j H10f 3HI NO S2jVNjWs31 3S;N3:)1I HDV3
I
(13'dlr)b3d GNO9 k.Lg-dnS
00,00S` I
Aluo salqej Bujulp It pule Aluo
auTM JO Jaaq Jo uoildwnsu' 0:)' - lueine;sa-d :M SSVID
00-OW1
Aluo aul/A - age>13ed 1!eja-d
00*00glz
Rally 2UT1tAo9 :.L Sgv-13
00,000z
a2unol e 41!,A weinelsa-d :S &SVID
oo*000lz
Aluo salqej SuTu,P 4e uoildwnsuo:) - aupinelsa-d :-d
SSVID
00,oull
sasTwaid uo uotidwnsuo3
ou - Aluo aurin Put jaaq pa3eja2lijaj
-uou Pue Pajeja2lijai - a2r>13ed pe4a-d :d SS;VID
ovooglz
sasiujaid uo uoildwnsuoD put ;)Se)iz)ed 1jejai
I
.sa2pol J040 w 'Suul J04ow 'SiaOw 'SlalOH :W S;S;V-I:)
00,000,z
4UaUJUIPI-JaWa aATj 2uliaijo Iqnr:) jaddnS :jq SSVID
00,09L
Aluo sasTwaid uo uoTidwnsuo.)
'aulm Put jaaq !asino'D J100 3:)Tj
. IsM *Md :0 SSVID
00,0001Z
asua:)Il 51jajale0 :3 SSb' TO
00*M
Aluo sasiwald uo uoildwnsuoD ,suo,jezjue2jo
lRujaJeJj JO ZMAID 'sqnlo aIRAyid i*T *
joid-uON :G &SV -I:)
oo,00c),z
Aluo a2e>lDed 1!eja-d ::) SSVID
00*000,z
Aluo sasiwaid uo uoT4dwnsuoZ) :9 S;S;V.,:)
00*00glz $ sastwaid uo uoildwnsuoo Put aSeN:md l!Pja-d :V SSVID
aaq jenuuV
:(901'Et u0113aS) S;9SN9011 S-dg-lvgo donbri -iiv.Lgd
.40 S3SSV13 Sf)01'dVA 9HI 'dOq &39J IVnNNV -40 ginciaHzn
04, Do' Usis + 00, UgLl $ jo wns aqj :BUT"IT01 aql UT 141JOJ las se aa; paqljz)said
sjaPual Put ' 08 61 'oe 11.idV Suipua
po!jad a4z jol a,suaD!l S,Jaleap jonbil d SsPQ R -jo; uoupwIdde sa>lew Aqaja4
U �:,oqS �U�Mu7f�QS,, qp-, -Muj7'PauSTsiapun a41
10 aRRMA at4i ui sionbi :Syoutlfl Io ajels '>f000 jo AlunoD IiDadsWd junoW
U �111040�Dfle Jo ales SuiielnSai 'PaPuawt s? 'ZS61 'Xienuer jo
ARP qzS I aql uo a2eMA P!RS Jo saaisni.L jo* pjeog at4l (q passed '£01`£I uojj:�ag se
um0u>t 'L961 do i:>adsOJd iunoW Jo apoD leciptunIN at44 jo suols,Aoid aqj of ,
luiensind
sioutin li:)adsoid lunoW 10 ageMA
Jau0Tss!ww00 loj1uo0 jonbr-1 leDol pup
luaP!SaJd a2elPA lasneiN -H UA1o*JeD ajqej0u0H
lonbT
(aa; Aluo QW14-auo lasua:)T-1
,I Aau JP--aDUenss1 J01 aag uogP:)ijddV alqepunja-d- uO'
'goo - IF "T'I'M91, N OCIS) X AgN
A aivci IVAgNg'd
9SN9 )II SildgIVAG 230nb1-1 -11V1221 E04 NOIIVDI-IddV
NOISSJWWOD JOdjNOD 2i -0—n-"51-1 IV—DOI
T10N1-)--11--r—,11Nr100 NOOD
d 5 0 A d 1 N n 0 W J 0 3 0 V 1 -1 1 A
Description and Name of Premises: Sbimada Shoteo II82 So Elmhurst Rd.,
Mt- Prospect, TL; see attached lease
---TD—escription must be complete as to floor, frontage, etc
Name of Owner of Premises: LaSalle National Bank, u/t 423(,)l
D Owner of record is a land tnmtee, attach copy of Land Trust Agreemcnt+See attached
letter fFo—m trustee.
If not Owner, �s��Uc�t have ��?Yem State �tea�|��t�
Is applicant an individual, a corporation, a co -partnership, or an association? (Circle one)
Dan individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number
and Social Security Number:
D co -partnership, state name, date of birth, telephone number
and Svrvu Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: Illinois,12/28/88
If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois,
indicate date qualifi6d under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact
business in Illinois: N/A
Dacorporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers,
and Social Security Numbers of officers and directors. Also list the names,
addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders
owning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such corporation.
OFFICE AND/OR
PERCENT OF
NAME ADDRESS
1775' —Syracuse Lane
Fumiyasu Yoshida Schaumburg, It 60193 President/Director/40"
Date of Birth: -11/17/51
Tadao'Til Shlmabuko
Social Security #352-58-8241 Phone # 893-5643
3082 Park View Circle Mt
Hoffman Fstateo' IL 68194 VP/Director/407
Date of Birth:-3/5/51 Sncle.1 Security # 354-60-3752 Phone # 490-193F
` I729 Syracuse
Harzoo1 Yoshida � Schaumburg, L 60193 Treasurer/ -0-7
Date of Birth : -11/18/50 Social 5moudt�0320-6O-S2O8 Phone P93-5643
��------- 3082 Park �it
Linda L. Shimabuku Hoffman Estates, IL 60194 Secretary/4-71,
Date of Birth' 5/5/60 Social Security #236-98-263n phone # 490-193P
See further information, attached, --------
O"Uj—ects for which organization is formedany or all lawful businesses
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the
applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents,
or stockholders ever been convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? ___Y
U applicant is an individual, state a�c�IT/A�
_Marital Status -
Is applicant a dbzcri of the United 3u^tc*? N/8 ��a naturalized dd��n
state date and place of naturalization: ----- ,
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next
prior to the filing of this application? Since January 4 I989
1182 So, Elmhurst
Local Address: MtProstIL
Telephone No, 640-I222
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: New corporation
no prior business,
State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time:,�16,780,40
Mow long has applicant been in this business? Scheduled to open 3/I/80.
Is the applicant an elected public official? if m4 state the
particulars thereof: ----
(s any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business
an elected public official? IT
N the rase of an application for the renewal of a license, has the
applicant made any political contributions within the pant 2 years? No
If so, sate the particulars thereof:
Doe, the applicant hold any law enforcement office? N/A if no designate
Does the applicant possess a current Federal Wagering or Gambling Device
Stamp? No If mo, state the reasons therefor:
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by
any of subsections (a) (J) through (a) (iO) of Section 28-1, or as
prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 1961° as heretofore
or hereafter amended? No If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other
license on premises other than described in thio application? _yoL_ If so
state disposition of such application:`
Is applicant qualificd to receive state and federal license, to operate an
alcoholic liquor business? Yes Has applicant ever had ~� —"°� license
revoked by the federal government or by any state or su-d�^�!^'^~^— thereof?
�!c�_- If »u^ explain;
Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter o,
thing construed by this Ordinance, the laws of this state or other
Ordinances of this YiUaQr N7
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois,
the United States of America, or any of the Ordinances of the YUlaDp of
Mount Prospect in the conduct of his place of business? ves
[mem applicant currently carry Dram Insurance coverage? ll "Yes
re "
attach copy. Will
be submitted prior to application a----- I '
pprova .
If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry
Dram Shop Insurance coverage? (If the answer to either of the foregoing
questions is "No," no license shaT����e.)WiII be covered by submitted
Certificate of Insurance, prior to application approval.
Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the
time of flling?____ Will be submitted Prior to app1icatioappr
State name and address of each surety next below:
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security
Number of manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application
is -L,Je: Tadashi S,himabuku, 2082 'Park View Circle Fast, Hoffman Estates,
1 60194; DOB 3/5/51; (312)490-1038
. ; SSA 354-60-3752
TFY Inc., d/b/a
�Iz,akaya Sankyo
SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT
T Jy Yo
by- umniya Yos
President
Corporate Seal
(if applicant is corporation)
Wh
the /a �Sj i Me� tpv,.prn, under oath deposes and says that he isAxv
I ic
th /4Pp ant Irley idense requested in the foregoing applicit—n; that
he is/190,Kof good repute, character and standing, and that answers to
the questions asked in the foregoing application are true and correct in
every detail.
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
) 5S.
COUNTY OF COOK )
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this -a\lff day of fir, A.D., 1989
Notary c
r-----OMCL" VAL
RMMTF XLM
Rt' »t 3TAra or
W W. -AM 14,1"2
L: -
----j
APPLICATION APPROVED:
Local Liquor control Commissioner
If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers,
and Social Security Numbers of officers and directors. Also list the names,
addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders
owning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such corporation.
NAME
Kunio Iwa,ate
Date of B the 6/25/55
Masaaki iyama
Date of k rth
ADDRESS
'I'I'I`-CYWgt Avenue
Elk trove Village, IL 60007
Social Security # 324-64-7023
306.22-3 Nish
6 Chome, Fdoj?awa-Yu
50ciLl Security # None
OFFICE AND/Q�
PERCENT OF
STOCK HELD
10*1
----------
Phone # 981-9531
1
Phone # 03-675-4318
Date of Birth:
--------- Social Security # Phone #
)ate of Birth-
---------- Social Security # Phone #
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended
by increasing the number of Class "P" liquor licenses by one (1) (TFK, Inc., d/b/a
Shimada Shoten, 1182 South Elmhurst Road) so that hereafter said Subsection A of
Section 13. 107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows:
11 Section 13.107. Number of Licenses:
Four (4)
Class A Licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Ten (10)
Class C Licenses
One (1)
Class D License
Two (2)
Class E Licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H License
One (1)
Class M License
Two (2)
Class P Licenses
Fifteen (15)
Class R Licenses
Twelve (12)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T License
Five (5)
Class W Licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
'after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided
by law.
AYES:
NAYES:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
day of 1989.
------Village -President
---Village -Clerk
I
Class
Establishment
Number
A
McBride's; Midwest Liquors;
Mrs. P & Me; Wille Liquors
4
B
Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's (83 & Golf);
Foremost Liquors; Gold Eagle Liquors;
The Liquor Shoppe; Mt. Prospect Liquors;
Osco Drug Store; Phar -Mor, Inc.;
Walgreens (83 & Golf); Walgreens (Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
I
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District -Golf Course
I
H
Zanie's
I
M
Holiday Inn
I
P
Arlington Club Beverage; Shimada Shoten
2
R
Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Crossroads; Edwardo's;
Fellini; Giordano's; House of Szechwan;
Little America; Pepe's; Sakura; Shin Jung;
Shogun; Sunrise; Torishin; Yasuke
15
S
Charlie Club; Ditty Unks; El Sombrero; Evans;
Florenz Italian Restaurant; Jake's Pizza;
Kampai; Old Orchard -Greenview; O'Neils Sports
Cafe; Reunion; Sam's Place; Second Dynasty
12
T
Thunderbird Lanes
I
W
Pete's Sandwich Palace; Pizza Hut
(Algonquin Rd); Pizza Hut (Euclid
Avenue); Sizzler's; Wag's
5
57
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER K,
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-89, THE ALTER GROUP
LAKE CENTER PLAZA, WEST OF ELMHURST, NO OF ALGONQUIN
DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1989
At the Village Board meeting of February 7, Trustee Farley asked
for clarification as to the differences in the 1987 variation
request for Lake Center Plaza, and the current application.
The actual variations being approved are the same in both
applications. However, certain section numbers that authorized
the variations have changed, as a result of our new parking
requirements.
Specifically, the 1987 Ordinance included variations to Sections
14.2205.E and 14.2907.B.2 pertaining to loading space requirements.
This same variation is approved with the current request, but from
Section 14.3012.B. Also, the 1987 Ordinance permits variations to
parking requirements of Section 14.2205.A and 14.2907.A to permit
"land banking" for future parking. This variation is not necessary
in the current request as our Section 14.3013 permits land banking.
DMC: hg
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER'S
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-89, THE ALTER GROUP
LOCATION: LAKE CENTER PLAZA, WEST OF ELMHURST, NO OF ALGONQUIN
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1989
The Alter Group is requesting a one-year extension for variations
that were previously granted by the Village Board on September 1,
1987. As you may recall, these variations were part of a package
of requests which included text amendment, rezoning and special use
for the Lake Center Plaza property. since construction did not
begin within one year of the September 1 approval date, the
variations become null and void. (The text amendment, rezoning and
special use remain intact.) The wording used in the new Exhibit
B submitted by the Alter Group is slightly different than the
approved variations in order to reflect the recent changes made to
the Zoning Code. A list of these variations can be found in the
January 26, 1989 minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing.
The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the variations as requested
by a vote of 6-0 with Mr. Lannon abstaining. No objectors or
interested parties were present in regard to this case.
PB:hg
APPROVED:
60 /� Lhgt
David M. Clements, Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 8-V-89
PETITIONER:
PUBLICATION DATE:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Hearing Date: January 26, 1989
The Alter Group
December 21, 1988
Lake Center Plaza
West side of Elmhurst Road
North of Algonquin Road
Variations as listed below.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Marilyn O'May
Robert Brettrager
I ki re =0-
Mr. Randy Thomas of the Alter Group and Mr. Lawrence Friedman,
attorney for the Group indicated that they were seeking the same
variations as requested a little over a year ago. The current
variations' time limit expired in September of 1988 and the Alter
Group would like the them extended for another year.
Paul Bednar, Planner, indicated that the same request is being
presented to the Board for which they have already granted approval.
No problems are foreseen.
Ms. O'May, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant the following
variations:
1. With respect to the property located in the I-1 Zoning District,
the terms of Article XXII Section 14.2202 shall be varied so as to
permit:
(a) Subsection 14.2202.B.3 which required a thirty foot (301) side
yard for interior lot lines in the I-1 District shall be varied to
allow a side yard of fifteen feet (151) plus one foot (11) for every
two feet (21) of building height above fifteen feet (151), subject to
the staff review and approval of the length of building;
(b) Section 14.2202.B.2 which requires a forty foot (401) side yard
for I-1 (Industrial) side yards adjacent to Residential Districts
shall be varied to allow a thirty foot (301) yard subject to
additional landscaping installed, which shall be reviewed and meet
requirements of the Department of Planning and Zoning;
(c) Section 14.2202.0.2 which required a forty foot (401) rear yard
for I-1 Industrial rear yards along the west property line of the
subject property adjacent to Residential Districts shall be varied to
allow a twenty foot (201) rear yard for building subject to additional
landscaping installed, which shall be reviewed and meet requirements
of the Planning and Zoning Department;
(d) Section 14.2202.E which requires a ten foot (101) side and rear
yard shall be varied to permit two parking lots, or shared/common
drive of service/loading facilities to abut, provided parking lot
landscaping shall ,be'reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Department;
(e) Section 14.2202.E which requires a forty foot (401) and a ten
foot (101) yard for parking and loading on the `west property line of
the subject property shall be varied to permit a zero foot (01) yard
for loading and a ten foot (101) yard for parking subject to
additional landscaping installed, which landscaping plan shall meet
the requirements of the Planning and Zoning Department;
(f) Section 14.2202.E which requires a ten foot (101) side yard for
parking shall be varied to permit a five foot (51) side yard where two
parking lots abut, provided there will be a minimum of ten feet (101)
landscape area between the two parking lots and the landscaping shall
be reviewed and meet the requirement of the Planning and Zoning
Department.
2. With respect to the 'property mlocated in the I-1 Zoning District
the terms of Article XXII Section 14.2203 shall be varied so as to
permit:
(a) Section 14.2203.A which requires a four (4) acre minimum lot ara
shall be varied to permit a two (2) acre minimum lot area.
3. With respect to the property 'located in the I-1 Zoning District
the terms of Article XXII Section 14.3012.E shall be varied so as to
permit.
(a) Section 14.3012.B which requires a twelve foot by fifty foot (12'
x 501) loading space for building less than forty thousand square feet
(40,000 sq. ft.) shall be varied to permit two (2) spaces twelve foot
by thirty-five feet (12' x 351) loading space for buildings over ten
thousand and less than thirty thousand square feet (30,000 sq. ft.) in
area subject to meeting the requirements of the Planning and Zoning
Department.
4. With respect to the property located in the O -R Zoning District,
the terms of Section 14.2902.B.1 which requires a ten foot (101) side
yard shall be varied to permit two parking lots of shared/common drive
or service/loading facilities to abut, provided parking lot
landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Department. Village Board 'action will be required for all requests.
PAGE TWO
Upon roll call: Ayes: Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon, Petrucelli,
O'May, Brettrager
Nayes: None
Abstain: Lannon
Mr. Lannon noted his abstention was due to his not being part of the
Zoning Board at the time of the prior approval.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
PAGE THREE
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING vamIazzOmS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS LAKE CENTER PLAZA SUBDIVISION
WBaRaa8, The alter Group (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from the following
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as Lake Center Plaza
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described on
Exhibits a a o attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof; and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks variations from the provisions
of Chapter 14, Section 14'2202'o'3, Section 14.2202.a.2, Section
14.2202,c,2, Section 14,2302-E, Section 14'2803'A, Section
14.2902.s,7, and Section 14.3012.o, said Sections relate to parking,
setbacks, loading, and lot oize.
WHEREAS, u public hearing was held on the variations
requested being the subject of xBa Case No. 8-v-89 before the Zoning
Board of Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 26th
days of January, 1989, pursuant to due and gcnpec notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 21st day of December,
1988/ and �
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its
findings and recommendation to the President and Board of
Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the
variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the
standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article vz of Chapter 14 of
the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it enoId
be in the best interest of the Village to grant the variation as
specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
caooTnoS or THE VILLAGE OF m0omr PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated findings of fact by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
sECrz0m TWO: The president and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the
variations requested with respect to Chapter 14 as follows:
l, Section 14.2202.B.3 which requires a thirty foot (301) side yard
for interior lot lines in the z-1 District shall be varied to
allow a side yard of fifteen feet (151) plus one foot (l') for
every two feet (21) of building height above fifteen feet (151),
subject to the staff review and approval of the length of
building;
2^ Section 14'2202'B.2 which requires a forty foot (40') side yard
for z-1 (Industrial) side yards adjacent to Residential Districts
shall be varied to allow a thirty foot (301) yard subject to
additional landscaping installed, ebiob shall be reviewed and
meet requirements of the Department Planning and Zoning;
3. Section 14,2202,C.2 which requires a forty foot (401) rear yard
for z-1 Industrial rear yards along the west property line of the
Subject Property adjacent to Residential Districts shall be
varied to allow a twenty foot (20') rear yard for building
subject to additional landscaping installed, which shall be
reviewed and meet requirements of the Planning and Zoning
Department;
uBA a -v-89
Page z of a
4. Section 14'3303'E which requires a ten foot (10') side and
rear yard shall be varied to permit two parking lots, or
shared/common drive or service/loading facilities to abut,
provided parking lot landscaping shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning and Zoning Department;
5- Section 14,2202.o which requires a forty foot <401> and a
ten foot (|O') yard for parking and loading on the west property
line of the Subject Property shall be varied to permit a zero
fnut (O') yard for loading and a ten foot (YO') yard for parking
subject to additional landscaping installed, which landscaping
nIao shall meet the requirements of the Planning and Zoning
Department;
h. Section 14.2202,E which requires a ten foot (10') side yard
for parking abaII be varied to permit a five foot (51) side yard
where two parking lots abut/ provided there will be a minimum of
tem feet (10') of landscaped area between the two parking lots
and the landscaping shall be reviewed and meet the requirements
of the Planning and Zoning Department.
7. Section 14'2203'A which requires a four (4) acre minimum lot area
shall be varied to permit a two (3) acre minimum lot area;
e. which i
be varied to permit two (2) parking lots or shared common
drive or service/loading facilities to abut provided parking
lot landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the the
Department of Planning and Zoning.
9. Section 14.3012.B which requires a twelve foot by fifty foot
(12' x 50') loading space for building less than forty thousand
square feet (40,000 eq.ft,) shall be varied to permit two (2)
spaces twelve foot by thirty-five feet (12' x 35') loading space
for buildings over ten thousand (10,000 ag.ft) and lees than
thirty thousand square feet (]O,OOO aq,ft') in area, subject to
meeting the requirements of the Planning and Zoning Department.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all
other applicable village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and Regulations shall
remain in full force and effect as to the subject Property,
SECTION rnom: In accordance with the provisions of
Section 14.604 the variations being --be subject of this Ordinance
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (l) year of the passage of this Ordinance for any
portion of the property.
omCTzmx FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law,
AYES:
NAYS:
AosomT;
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST: Carolyn H. Krause
Village President
1989.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
io Mi)
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
11�t_F_-�J)_
SUBJECT:
ZBA-1-V-89, IRENE A.
GROESCHELL
LOCATION:
1613 ROSETREE LANE
DATE:
FEBRUARY 10, 1989
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1
to allow a 51-7 1/211 side yard instead of 10 feet as required by
Code in order to construct a room addition off the rear of the
existing home. Mrs. Groeschell first presented this case to the
Zoning Board of Appeals at a January 26, 1989 hearing, and then
most recently at the February 9, 1989 Board meeting.
Mrs. Groeschell stated that her lot is a pie -shaped lot, being wide
at the street and narrow at the rear property line. Since the lot
is wider at the front, a 10 foot side yard is required. (Standard
single family lots require 6.5 foot side yards.) However, because
of the configuration of the lot, the building area behind the
building is very restricted.
The applicant requests a variation to encroach into this 10 foot
side yard with a room addition. In her opinion, this location was
the most logical since it will tie into the existing floor plan.
Mrs. Groeschell also pointed out that the minimum separation
between her new room addition and her neighbor's home to the
northwest, is to be 19 1/2 feet, which is greater than most
separations between homes in the Village.
The Village staff concurred with the applicant's statements that
the lot is of an unusual pie -shape, being wide in the front, narrow
in the rear. This fact in itself restricts any building addition
behind the existing home without a variation. Staff also mentioned
that the floor area ratio lot coverage and other zoning require-
ments were well within Code.
Mr. and Mrs. Klosowski of 1615 Rosetree spoke in opposition to the
request. They stated that their home was near the room addition,
and that reducing the side yard from the 10 foot requirement would
adversely effect their property value.
Gil Basnik - Page Two
ZBA-1-V-89
February 10, 1989
At the direction of the Zoning Board, the applicant returned on
February 9 in order to present more detailed floor plans of the
existing home and to report on any further revisions to the
addition. The floor plans presented identified the east end of the
home as being a below -grade family room with bedrooms above. it
was for this reason, that the Groeschells had proposed the addition
on the opposite end. Mr. Groeschell stated that the one-story room
addition would tie into the west end floor plan without necessi-
tating grade level changes. In order to incorporate good design
of the addition, it was his opinion that the addition could not be
cut back to meet the 10 foot setback without sacrificing the
integrity of the architecture. The applicants then presented
construction plans of the addition and photographs of their house
and the neighbor to the northwest, showing the location of the
addition. Mrs. Groeschell once again emphasized the fact that,
even with this addition encroaching into the side yard, the closest
point to her neighbor's home would be 19 1/2 feet, well above the
13 to 15 foot average between other homes in town.
Four letters supporting the proposed variation were submitted by
the petitioner to the Zoning Board. Also present to object were
the neighbors from 1615 Rosetree and 1609 Rosetree.
After much discussion by the Zoning Board members, a motion was
made to approve a 51 7 1/211 setback. The motion was denied, 3-4,
with Basnik, Brettrager, Brothers and Lannon voting to deny the
request. Reasons for denial were concerns for the adjacent
neighbor and the impact it may have on the surrounding neighbor-
hood.
PB: hg
APPROVED:
?"A
David M. Clements, Director of
Planning and Zoning
q
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 1-V-89 Hearing Date: February 9, 1989
PETITIONER: Irene A. Groeschell
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1613 Rosetree Lane
PUBLICATION DATE: January 9, 1989
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a
variation from Section 14.1102.B.1
to allow a 51-7 1/211 side yard
instead of 10 feet as required by
Code in order to construct a room
addition off the rear of the
existing home.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
INTERESTED PARTIES:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Len Petrucelli arrived at 8:05 p.m.
Robert Anderson, 1616 Rosetree
Janet Kritec, 1611 Rosetree
Dale Thal, 1618 Rosetree
Resident, 1511 Larch Drive
Mr./Mrs. Klosowski,1615 Rosetree
Chairman Basnik asked Paul Bednar to summarize the request for the
information of the Board and the audience. Mr. Bednar summarized
the application and stated that this had been continued from the
meeting of January 26 to allow the petitioner an opportunity to
bring in a detailed site plan, to justify the need for the room
addition at the proposed location, and other information deemed
necessary by the Zoning Board.
Mr. Bednar stated that the variation is necessary primarily because
of the shape of the lot being very wide at the front and narrowing
down to the rear of the property. He stated this excessive lot
width requires a side yard variation larger than normal, and that
-this is the requirement for which the petitioner is requesting
variation approval.
Mrs. Groeschell distributed to the Zoning Board photographs of the
home, construction drawings of the proposed addition and an
Case No. ZBA-1-V-89
February 9, 1989
Page 2 of S
elevation and floor plan that helped explain the necessity for the
room addition at the proposed location. Mrs Groeschell stated
that the side yard is kept as wide as possible for the room
addition, but that a variation is necessary for the structure, as
the 10 foot requirement could not be met and permit the
construction of a reasonable addition to the home. Mrs. Groeschell
submitted four letters to the Zoning Board that were read in
support of the, application. Mr. Basnik noted that adjoining
property owner,, Robert Anderson, across the street from the
petitioner; Janet Kritec, at 1611 Rosetree; Dale Thal, at 1618
Rosetree; and Resident at 1511 Larch Drive indicated no objection
to the request,
Mr. & Mrs. Klosowski, at 1615 Rosetree, spoke in opposition to the
request. They stated that their home was near the room addition,
and that reducing the side yard from the 10 foot requirement would
adversely effect their property value. They noted that the
location of the room addition would be permanently visible from
their home and they felt that the Zoning Ordinance should be met
with the construction proposed by the Groeschells.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and reviewed the
floor plan, photographs and construction drawings submitted by the
petitioner. Members noted that the room addition is constructed
at an angle that is somewhat unusual, and that this may have an
adverse effect on the adjoiningproperty, simply because of the
unusual appearance of the angled wall on the room addition. Mrs.
Groeschell noted that the angled wall is necessary to maintain as
wide a side yard as possible.
Mr. Basnik asked the petitioner the height of the room addition and
Mrs. Groeschell confirmed that the structure will be one-story in
height.
Mr. Lannon noted that the house is placed on the lot at an angle,
and that the existing, conditions are unusual and may have an impact
on the neighborhood. He stated that the room addition might add
to this negative impact.
Mr. Basnik stated that the Klosowski's_at 1615 Rosetree had
appeared at both meetings and spoke in opposition to the request,
and that he believed the opinion of the adjoining property owners
was, very, important, tnasmuch as -they would .be =re readily affected
by the request.)
Mr. Basnik and the Zoning Board reviewed the variation standards
of the Zoning Ordinance in an effort .to determine how this request
Case No. ZBA-1-V-89
February 9, 1989
Page 3 of 3
met the applicable requirements. The Zoning Board members found
that the property owner had no hardship in the request, and felt
that the room addition could be constructed on the property to meet
all requirements. They also felt that the room addition would
adversely effect adjoining properties and the character of the
neighborhood, based on comments by the neighbor. Mrs. Groeschell
pointed out that the room addition would be 19 feet from the
neighbor's property and that there would not be an adverse effect
as stated by Mr. and Mrs. Klosowski.
Zoning Board members continued the discussion on the request and
it was believed that this was a difficult decision, considering the
objections by the adjoining property owner. Mr. Basnik then asked
for a motion on the request.
Mr. Cassidy moved that the Zoning Board approve a 51 7-1/211 side
yard for a room addition at 1613 Rosetree. The motion was seconded
by Mrs. O'May.
Upon roll call: AYES: Cassidy, O'May, and Petrucelli
)NAYS: BrettrAger, Brothers, Lannon and Basnik
The motion was denied by a 3-4*vote. Reasons for the denial were
concerns for the adjacent neighbor and the impact the room addition
may have on surrounding properties.
David M. Clements,
Recording Secretary
aq4 uaaxqaq aouag aql -pauTpquTeui aq PTnoqs apoD aqq buT4eqs uoiqTppp
aqq 04 uOlqTsoddo jag paqeoTpuT aaaqasoa 5191 'T4sAvsOTX PPUTq
-auiT Aqjadoad a44 MOIJ 4a93 XTS xopq qas aq TTTM PUP Olqed
9144 aDVTdsTP TTTM UOT4TPPP pasodoid aql -Aqjadoid s,joqiqbiau iaq
go qaaj aajqq U1144TA 04 spuaqxa PUP aulOT4 aqq go Jeal aq
4 014 P94POOT
sT oiqed ui paouai P 'Alquaiano -paqoajjp qsom atlq sT oqn qsanqqjou
e1qq 0-4 -ToqqbTau aqq uo qopdwT 4UEDT3TU6TS Ou 9q TTTM ;Iaqq qpqq papoa
aqq AJSTqPs pup diqspjeq e' tts'Tqeqsa Isnm 4uPDTTdde aill 'Tusodoid
aTqq sv TeoTqoejd sp qou aip Aaqq '9TqTsea3 eap suoTqdo aaqqo qbnoqqTv
-S4UaUlaJTnbaa 4opqqas PleA aPTS 49aul 04 4TnDT33TP 4T BUTXPW lauloq aqq
go avaj aqq qP peonpaj sT P@JP aTqppTTnq aqq ljoT pedpqs-aid aqq oq
anP qPT44 P94P4S IVUpaa 'IN -UOT4TPpe aq4 JO JOAP9 UT J9uOT4T49d aq4
JO J0qq5TaU P uIOJJ 4u8ulmOD uaq4TJA P paqqTmqns 'JauueTd 'JPUP99 TnPd
'TEDT50T 4SOUl aq4 U014200T
pasodoid aTAq sexpm asnoq aqq JO uPTd aooTj BUTqSTX@ eqq ljaAaKOH
-asnoq aqq go quoij alqq tuoij qno jo asnoiq aiqq go pue qspa ajjq
qP paopTd jT squameaTnbea xopqqas PJPA 9PTs 4aaw PTnoo uotqTppE aqj
'40T padpqs-aTd P uo sqTs qotqA auioq jag oq uoTqTppe ulooi P buiuupTd
sl @Iqs 4ET44 Pa4P4s 'a9J4es0a E19T 'TT9q3saOI0 -V 9uaJI 'JauOT4T4ad 9ql
jaueex q4aqezTTH
TXSMQSOTX 49140
TXSMVSOTX laq4sa
TT9140seOl0 PPJUOD
T4sARsOTX PPUlq
:GalSadalNI/SHOlDaf9O
jabejqqaja qjaqoa
APN,O UATTIPW
(-ui-d OT:8 P9ATIIV) TTTaonjqad uaq
(-ui-d SO:9 P;ATJJV) uOuuPrl la49d
APTssPD PTPuOH
saaqqoaa STorj
uPuljTpqo IXTuspa qaaqTTO
:lNaSaad MaWaK VEZ
-UoTqTppe ulool
9 AOTTP 04 96PIP6 Paqou4ap a7q4 pup
aanqonj4s TpdTouiad alqq uaaxqaq laaj
t, go uotqpjpdas uinUITUTW P AOTTP 04
T*2*ZO1j-tlj U01409S UIOJJ UOT4RTJPA
aaiqasoa 6191
:)UHadOUd 10afafIS
8861 11Z jaqmaoa(j
:HIVQ N011V3IqHfld
TTa7qOs@oaD -V auaij
:HaNOIlIlad
6961 19Z Aaienupf :94EG BUTJPaH
68-A-1 aSVO VaZ
SqVaddY dO GaVOR ONINOZ 1OHdSOHd INflOW
HHS aO ONIlaaW HVqn0aa alll dO SaInNIK
yard is not a permanent structure. The addition, being a permanent
structure, could be a fire hazard.
Conrad Groeschell, 1613 Rosetree, stated that his neighbor has almost
the identical addition that he is proposing, however, since their lot
is square they had no problem with Code requirements. His addition is
designed in the best way and is aesthetically pleasing. Mr.
Groeschell also indicated that he is handicapped and has difficulty
going up to the bedrooms.
Esther Klosawski, 1615 Rosetree, stated that she opposed the addition.
She does not wish to look at siding from her bedroom window and does
not want the addition on the property line. She also indicated that
she had not seen the plans.
It was noted that the neighbor's house was for sale.
Chet Klosawski, 1615 Rosetree, indicated that he did want the Code to
be broken.
Elizabeth Keener, 1609 Rosetree, stated that she has lived in the area
a long time and likes the zoning and does not want to see it changed.
An addition could become a fire hazard.
Mrs. Groeschell stated that the addition will be one story and the
only reason they are before the Zoning Board is due to the odd shaped
lot. It was noted that the closest distance between the room addition
and the neighbor's home is 19 feet.
Discussion ensued as to the best possible solution for the addition
location. Mr. Groeschell stated that his plan was the most logical,
since going off the east side or out the front would not look as
aesthetically pleasing. There is a roof line -to follow.
Mr. Basnik requested that a floor plan and sketch of the home be
brought in for Board review and decision.
This case was continued until February 9, 1989 at 8:00 p.m.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
PAGE TWO
DALE 1, JEANETTE THAL
1618 POSETREE LANE
MT. PROSPECT, IL 60056
February 7, 1999
Mt. Prospect Zoning Board of Aooeal s
112 East Northwest Highway
Mt. Prospect , IL 6C.)(756
Fe: Case No. ZBA 1-Y-99
1813 Posetree Lane
Mt. Prospect, !L 6^056
Gentlemen:
We're writing in reference to the atcve Case #ZEIA 1-1)-89,
which rent -tests a variance to the coning --iles for that
We can think s4 mc reascr-i to tur-, down this request. The
jq feet between the proposed addition and the house at
1615 Posetree Lane S"CUId be adequate, and the request to
allow this variance seems reasonable.
Our Understanding is that the addition will increase the
value of said mropertv and that improvements within A -
neighborhood also increase the values 04 the other
mroperties in that neighborhood.
Thanks for your consideration.
Sincere! y.
/it
Janet A. Kritek
1611 Rosetree Lane
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
February 7, 1989
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
112 East Northwest Highway
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: Case No. ZBA 1-V-89
1613 Rosetree Lane
Mount ProsnAct, IL
Gentlemen:
I am writing this in regards to the Zoning Variance requested
by Irene A. Groeschell.
I reside right next door (1611 Rosetree Lane) to the property
in question and have been shown all the blueprints as to their
plans for the addition. I have no objection to the
Groeschell's building this addition and feel it would not be
detrimental to my home or the immediate neighborhood. This
proposed addition would add to the price of their home thus
increasing the values of the homes on the block.
I feel the Board should allow them to obtain a variance on
their zoning request.
Sincerely,
Janet A. Kritek
Qo6tpt C. Andarson
1616 Qasatrae Lan•
Mt. P"%pact, 111. 60056
Jan. 28, 1989
Mount Prospect Zoning Board Of Appeals
112 East Northwest Highway
Mount Prospect, I1. 60056
Subject: Case No. ZBA 1-V-89
1613 Rosetree Lane
Mt. Prospect, I1.
Gentlemen:
With reference to the petition for Variation as
covered by the above subject case I wish to comment as follows:
I live directly across the street from the property
for which Variation to the Zoning Code has been requested. I
have reviewed the plans of the proposed addition as well as
the building site and can find no reason to object to this
variation of a few feet in the code requirements. There is
stillat least 191 feet between the proposed addition ano the
nearest adjacent dwelling.
I feel the Board should have no qualms in granting
this reasonable request.
Yours truly,
Robert C. Anderson
v
PROPOSE D
EDDITION
NO SCALE '
GARAGE
AT GRADE
LEVEL
FRONT VIEW
DIN .` KITCHEN
FAMILY ROOM
NINb
BELOW
GRADE
LIVING
I
ROOM
BED ROOMS
AT GRADE LEVEL
ABOVE
NO SCALE '
GARAGE
AT GRADE
LEVEL
FRONT VIEW
'REAR VIEW
B ATH
BD -3 �/
NO SCALE
l
11
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
GIL BASNIK,
PAUL BEDNAR,
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-1-V-89,
IRENE A.
GROESCHELL
LOCATION:
1613 ROSETREE
LANE
DATE:
JANUARY 19,
1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1
to allow a 5'-7 1/21" side yard ,instead of 10 foot as required by
Code in order to construct a room addition.
01M _kP go
Both the Engineering and Inspection Service Departments note that
the grading along the north property line must not be altered. If
this variation is approved the grading plan must be submitted with
the building plan showing the existing and proposed grades.
Building permits will be required prior to any building. No other
comments or objections were received regarding this case.
This home is located on the northeast end of town in a single
family neighborhood. The lot is laid out in such a manner that it
has a wade width at the front property line (because of a curve in
Rosetree Lane) and a narrow width to the rear. The same is true
of the neighbor to the southeast. The lot size is approximately
9,750 square feet which is slightly larger than the standard single
family lot. Ten foot side yards are required, because of the wide
frontage at the front property line, ten foot side yards are
required. The Floor Area Ratio, including the new proposed room
addition, will be .235 whereas Code allows .25. The total
impervious lot surface coverage, including the new proposed room
addition, will be approximately 32% (Code allows 50%).
As a result of the pie -shaped lot, the buildable area is reduced
at the rear of the house. A room addition could meet side yard
setback requirements if placed at the east end of the house or out
from the front of the house. However, the existing floor plan of
the house makes the proposed location the most logical.
Gil Basnik - Page Two
ZBA-1-V-89
January 19, 1989
The neighboring property to the northwest will be most affected by
this proposal. Presently, a fenced in patio is located to the rear
of Ms. Groeschell's home and extends to within three feet of her
neighbor I s property. This proposed addition will displace the
patio and will be set back 6 feet from the property line. Sadly,
the room addition will necessitate the removal of a very mature
Maple tree. The applicant should address the hardship suffered if
the ten foot setback requirement is met.
In summary, the applicant's pie -shaped lot makes it difficult to
meet side yard setback requirements. Although other options are
feasible, they are not as practical as this proposal. The
applicant must establish a hardship and satisfy the Board that no
significant impact upon the neighbor to the northwest will occur.
PB: hg
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF
CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE' OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the mount Prospect Park District, through its Board of
Commissioners (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an
,application to amend Section 14.3012.A of Chapter 14, entitled
"Zoning Ordinance" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect for
property legally described on the attached Exhibit "All; and
WHEREAS, the text amendment being the subject of this Ordinance
amends the number of parking spaces required for specified uses
from 10 (ten) spaces per 1,000 (one thousand) square feet of floor
area to 5 (five) spaces per 1,000 (one thousand) square feet of
floor area, and to amend the parking regulation for outdoor
swimming pools to provide for one space per 75 (seventy-five)
square feet of water area; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the proposed amendment
request being the subject of ZBA Case No. 3-A-89 before the Zoning
Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 9th day
of February, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mgunt Prgspect Hgrald on the 9th day of January,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board Of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the amendments
requested and have determined that the same would be in the best
interest of the Village and the Board of Trustees further find that
it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the
amendments specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
5&9TJ_QN0AE_- The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
UCTION TWO: That section 14.3012.A of chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning", as amended, is hereby further amended in proper
alphabetical sequence; so that hereinafter said Section 14.3012.A
shall be and read as follows:
Assembly hall, banquet hall, convention 10/1000 sq.ft
halls, dance halls, skating rinks
Recreational facilities, gymnasiums, 5/1000sq.ft.of
bowling alley, arcades, health club, floor area
indoor swimming pools (other than
single family and excluding locker
rooms from the above facilities)
Outdoor swimming pools (other than 1/75 sq.ft. of
single family) water area it
5BQTION THBX&.-. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
ZBA 3-A-89
Page 2 of
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989.
Carolyn H. Krause
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNE9;"
SUBJECT: ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89, MOUNT PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT
LOCATION: 420 WEST DEMPSTER ST. - DEMPSTER DEVELOPMENT CENTER
DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1989
The Mount Prospect Park District is requesting both a text
amendment and a variation to the Zoning Code. The Text Amendment
will change the parking space requirements from 10 per thousand
square feet of floor area to 5 per thousand square feet of floor-
area
loorarea for the following uses: Recreational facilities, convention
halls, dance halls, skating rinks, assembly halls, gymnasiums,
bowling alley, arcades, health club, and indoor swimming pools (not
including locker rooms) . Also included in this amendment is a new
requirement for outdoor swimming pools of one space per 75 square
feet of water area.
A variation is also requested to allow a 38 foot height for a small
portion of the building. The Code allows a maximum of 24 feet in
a residential district. This case was presented to the Zoning
Board of Appeals on February 9, 1989.
The Park District addressed the text amendment issue first. They
had conducted studies of the parking provisions for other
recreational facilities in the suburban area and found that the 5
per thousand proposed for the Dempster Development Center would be
more than adequate. Because this center will be a mixed use
recreational facility, the building will typically operate at
capacity during the winter months when athletic fields are not in
use. The opposite is true in the summer when the athletic fields
are used to capacity and the building is not. Providing 5 parking
spaces per thousand square feet as proposed for the building and
the additional spaces required by Code for the outdoor fields will,
in the Park District's opinion, be more than adequate.
Village staff concurred with the Park District that the current
requirement of 10 spaces per thousand square feet for these type
uses is excessive. After surveys made of other town's ordinances
in regards to these uses and also a review of the Park District's
study, the staff feels comfortable in amending the text.
John F. Dixon - Page 2
ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
February 16, 1989
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed text amendment
at length and voiced concerns with the reduction of spaces provided
for some of the uses outlined in the amendment, such as, bowling
alley, skating rink, dance halls, convention centers and assembly
halls. Some of the Board members expressed the opinion that those
uses should stay at the 10 per thousand square feet requirement.
Based on this concern, and further research, the staff recommends
that ten per 1,000 remain as the parking requirement for assembly
halls, convention halls, dance halls and skating rinks. Several
members of the Zoning Board also believed a parking variation for
the Park District might be preferable to a text amendment.
The second request by the Park District is a variation pertaining
to the building height for a small portion of the building. The
Park District representatives stated that a gymnastics space was
to be located on the second floor and requires a higher than normal
ceiling. For this reason, a 38 foot height is proposed. The
remainder of the building will be 32 feet to accommodate a higher
gymnasium ceiling among other uses. The fact that this building
is to be located adjacent to a commercial building (Venture Store)
and quite a distance away from any residential minimizes any impact
on the neighborhood. Staff concurred with the Park District on the
building height variation. The Zoning Board had no objection with
the building height variation request.
Mr. Stecker, a concerned resident, was present to voice his
objections to the height variation. He also was of the opinion
that the Zoning Board did not have sufficient information, such as,
staff comments on the building plans in order to arrive at a
decision. The staff responded to Mr. Stecker's concern stating
that the details on the actual building are being discussed and
will be resolved before nermits are issued.
The Zoning Board voted 4-3 to approve the text amendment in its
proposed format. Mr. Cassidy, Lannon and Petrucelli voted nay and
reasoned that the proposed parking for the Dempster Development
Center seemed to be adequate, but they had concerns with similar
type uses in the future. They felt the Park District should
request a variation. The height variation was approved unanimously
7-0.
PB:hg
APPROVE, fD :
David M. Clements, Director
Planning and Zoning Dept.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-3-A-89
Hearing Date: February 9, 1989
and ZBA-4-V-88
PETITIONER:
Mount Prospect Park District
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Dempster Development Center
420 West Dempster Street
PUBLICATION DATE:
January 9, 1989
REQUEST:
The Mount Prospect Park District
is requesting both a text amendment
and a variation to the Zoning Code.
The Text Amendment is to Section
14.3012 to change the parking space
requirements from 10 per thousand
square feet of floor area to 5 per
thousand square feet of floor area
for the following uses: Recreational
facilities, convention halls, dance
halls, skating rinks, assembly
halls, gymnasiums, bowling alley,
arcades, health club, and indoor
swimming pools (not including
locker rooms). Also included in
this revised text is a new
requirement for outdoor swimming
pools of one space per 75 square
feet of water area. Variation
requested from Section 14.1104.A
to allow a 381 maximum building
height instead of 241 allowed by
Code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Len Petrucelli
INTERESTED PARTIES: Joseph Stecker, 1602 Willow
Mr. Basnik introduced the next agenda item being the Mount Prospect
Park District's request for text amendment to permit 5 parking
spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area rather than 10
spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area for a recreational
center, and a building height variation to allow a 38 foot building
in an R-1 District.
Case No. ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 2 of 5
Mr. Walter Cook introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated
he is superintendent of recreation for the Park District. He
stated the District plans to demolish the existing Dempster
Development Center and construct a new recreation facility at this
location. Mr. Cook introduced Project Architect, John Vaci. Mr.
Vacii stated that the proposed facility is an 83,000 square foot
recreational building. With a mounted site plan he oriented the
Zoning Board to the development and surrounding properties. He
stated that the Venture Store is located to the east, the
Commonwealth Edison easement to the north, and Park District open
space and baseball diamonds to the west. He stated considering
these surrounding uses, the minor building height variation should
not have an adverse effect on adjoining properties.
The architect presented a mounted floor plan that depicted the
interior layout of the multi -use building. He stated that the
building consists of an indoor swimming pool, gymnasium, exercise
areas, handball courts, child care, and administrative offices.
He also noted that,a significant portion of this site is devoted
to outdoor recreation uses, such as, baseball diamonds. Mr. Vasi
stated that in summer months, when there is peak use of the
baseball diamonds, there are fewer people using the recreation
building and that in peak winter months, with heavy use of the
recreation building, there is no use of the baseball diamonds and
outdoor facilities. He stated that, with this type of seasonal use
of the property, there is never a large demand on the parking from
both uses. He also stated that within the interior of the
building, if you examine each use individually, the present 10
spaces per thousand is excessive. The architect stated that users
of the facility will, for example, first use the locker, then move
to the swimming pool or the gymnasium and use different parts of
the building and that there is never a constant heavy demand in any
part of the building. He stated that examining each use of the
building individually, the Park District arrived at a number of 5
spaces per 1,000 meeting actual demand. He indicated that the Park
District is trying to provide reasonable parking for users and that
5 spaces per 1,000 will meet their anticipated heaviest use. He
indicated that the District could pave and provide additional
parking in the future if there does prove to be a parking deficit,
but that he believes 5 spaces per 1,000 is sufficient for the use
of a building of this size.
As a further e)i
office area of
calculated indi-v
that providing I
was not reasonal
these limited us
mple, he mentioned the day care center and the
the building and stated that, if these were
dually, they would require'4 spaces per 1,000 and
spaces per 1,000 for the office and the day care
e and provided an over -abundance of parking for
areas in the facility.
o
Case No. ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 3 of 5
Mr. Vaci also referred back to the building height variation and
stated that the location of the new building provides increased
setbacks over the existing building, and that this leads to more
open space, and green area on the site. He specifically noted that
the 38 foot building height is attributable to a second level
gymnastics area in one of the gymnasiums.
Mr. Bednar then addressed the Zoning Board and stated that the
request was solely for the purposes of a text amendment for parking
and the building height variation, and that the Park District was
not applying for any zoning change to permit development of the
facility. Mr. Bednar stated the staff looked at each use within
the recreational building and calculated the requirement for each
use, and that by examiningtheproposal in this fashion, the staff
found that 10 spaces per 1,000 provided an excessive amount of
parking on the site. Mr. Bednar indicated that the staff looked
at Zoning Ordinances from other suburban municipalities and looked
at the parking for similar recreational facilities, and found that
other communities administer parking requirements substantially
less than 10 per 1,000. Mr. Bednar admitted that the 10 per 1,000
requirement was from the new parking section of the Zoning
Ordinance adopted only in the last year, and that this requirement
was more of an educated guess to be conservative, should there be
a need in the community to construct a new recreational facility.
In reference to the building heig.,�t, Mr. Bednar stated that the
small portion of the building with a 38 foot height would have no
impact on surrounding properties.
Chairman Basnik then asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Joe
Stecker of 1602 Willow Lane objected to the building height as
presented to the Zoning Board, and made reference to what he
believed was an inconsistency in the plans reviewed by the Zoning
Board. He stated that he believed the plans should be revised to
properly depict the section of the building with a 38 foot building
height. Mr. Stecker stated that he believed the parking provided
for the building was sufficient but he had concerns about the
limited points of access from the site. Mr. Stecker also stated
that the Zoning Board did not have sufficient information to act
on the request, and that there was no site engineering or comments
from the Fire Department as to access on maneuverability.
Case No ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 4 of 5
Mr. Bednar stated that many of these :details, referred to by Mr.
Stecker were subject to specific Code requirements and ;permit
issuance, and that the Park District had conversations ongoing with
Village staff for over a year about development of this site. He
indicated that many of the items referred to by Mr. stecker would
be reviewed by staff at the time permits are applied for.
Mr. Vasi gave a summary of the driveway design and automobile
circulation on site, and stated that one main driveway is
designated for the property to limit access onto Dempster Street,
and to provide proper automobile stacking on site to avoid
congestion on the adjoining public street.
The, Zoning,. Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it
was, noted that the 38 foot building height was a minor variation,
and. would have no effect on adjoining properties. The Zoning Board
them looked at the merits of the text amendment for the change of
parking requirement and noted that a text amendment might not be
appropriate for this, case.' Members of the Zoning Board believed
that the parking provided at the Dempster Development Center was
sufficient for Park District use, but that perhaps a variation to
the existing requirement might be a better way to proceed. Members
of the Zoning Board thought that a text amendment might set a
precedent for future development in the community which may not
have sufficient parking:
Messrs. Bednar and Clements stated that the staff was recommending
a text amendment simply because the current requirement of 10 per
1,000 in the ordinance seemed excessive, once a recreation
facility, such as the Park District proposal, was examined in great
detail. The staff stated that 10 per 1,000 was excessive, and that
they were uncomfortable with the requirement in the Zoning
Ordinance that .required parking way beyond what was necessary.
Messrs. Bednar and Clements stated that staff had examined
available parking at similar recreational" facilities and other
suburban ordinances,;, and this confirmed that the parking
requirement of the Zoning Ordinance was inappropriate and that
parking at the Dempster Center was sufficient for the proposed use.
Zoning Board members indicated a preference for variation but felt
like requiring the Park District to refile for variation might
place a hardship can their anticipated May 1st start of
construction. Mr. Basnik stated that, if the staff was comfortable
with a text amendment,' then he believed that sufficient thought and
work went into the proposal, and that he did not believe a
precedent for future development under the new requirement of 5 per
1,000, would cause a hardship for the community.
I
a
Case No. ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 5 of 5
Members of the Zoning Board believed that a variation might be
better as the case could be considered on its own merits but
indicated there was a reluctance to slow the process down for the
Park District. Accordingly, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the
request.
Mrs. O'May moved that the Zoning Board approve a text amendment to
reduce parking from 10 spaces per 1,000 to 5 spaces per 1,000 for
the category of a Recreation Center as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance. Motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon roll call: AYES: Brothers, O'May, Brettrager and Basnik
NAYS: Cassidy, Lannon and Petrucelli
The motion was approved by a vote of 4-3. Messrs. Cassidy, Lannon
and Petrucelli voted in opposition to the request indicating a
preference to vary the parking requirement rather than to approve
a text amendment.
Mr. Basnik then asked for a motion on the building height
variation. Mr. Cassidy moved that a 38 foot building height be
approved. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Brothers.
Upon roll call: AYES: Brothers, O'May, Brettrager, Cassidy,
Lannon, Petrucelli and Basnik
Motion carried.
NAYS: None
David M. Clements,
Recording Secretary
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 420 WEST DE14PSTER STREET
MQUNT RROSEEQM,_1LL1X=
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Park District, has filed an application
for a variation from Chapter 14 entitled "Zoning" of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect for property commonly known as Dempster
Development Center located at 420 West Dempster Street (hereinafter
referred to as Subject Property) and legally described on the
attached Exhibit "All; and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1104 to allow
a maximum building height of thirty-eight feet (381) rather than
the permitted height of twenty-four feet (241); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation request
(designated as ZBA Case No. 4-V-89) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 9th day of
February, 1989, pursuant to due and proper legal notice thereof
published in the Mount -2rospe9t Herald on the 9th day of January,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findin
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of t
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Truste
of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered t
variation requested and find that it would be in the best intere
of the Village to grant the variation requested. I
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
512MON ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
Of the Village of Mount Prospect.
—3*W.ION IWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount'Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1104 to allow a building of height of thirty-eight
feet (381) for a portion of the building as specified on the
building plans.
SXCTIQN THREE: That, except for the variations granted herein,
all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and
regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject
Property.
5LECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within a one (1) year period from the date of
passage of this ordinance.
FTONV
That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its Passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1988.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Carolyn H. Krause
Village President
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Parcel I
That part of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section
14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
described as follows; Beginning at a point 63.21 feet East of the East
line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14
and 440.09 feet North of the South line of said Section 14; thence Easterly
along a line parallel to said South line of Section 14 for a distance
of 220.0 Feet; thence Northerly along a line parallel to said East Line
of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 14 for a
distance of 522.0 feet; thence Westerly along a line parallel to said
South Line of Section 14 for a distance of 260.0 feet; thence Southerly
along a line parallel to said East line of the Southwest Quarter of the
Southeast Quarter of Section 14 for a distance of 400.0 feet; thence
Easterly along a line parallel to said South Line of Section 14 for a
distance of 40.0 feet; thence Southerly along a line parallel to said
East Line of the Southwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section
14 for a distance of 122.0 feet to the point of beginning.
Parcel 2 B
The Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, Township 41 North,
Range 11 East of the third principal meridian, (excepting therefrom that
part thereof which lies East of a line 562 feet East of and parallel
with the West line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of said
Section 14, as measured along the South line thereof, and also excepting
therefrom that part thereof which lies East of the West line of Lot 2
in Kenroy's Huntington Subdivision, being a subdivision of the part of
the East 1/2 of Section 14, Township 41 North Range 11 East of the third
principal meridian, and also excepting therefrom that part thereof lying
Northerly of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the
East line of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14 aforesaid,
210.03 feet (measured along said East Line) South of the Northeast corner
of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14; and running
thence West along a line which is 210.0 feet South of (measured at Right
angles to) and parallel with the North line of said Southeast 1/4 of
the Southeast 1/4, a distance of 702.09 feet; thence running Southwesterly
for a distance of 630.50 feet, more or less, to a point on the West line
of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, which point
is 313.80 feet South of the Northwest Corner of said Southeast 1/4 of
the Southeast 1/4 of Section 14, and also excepting therefrom that part
of the West 283.21 feet thereof which lies North of the South 435.00
Feet thereof, as measured along the South and West lines thereof, (excepting
from said last exception the North 127.09 feet of the South 562.09 feet
of the West 63.21 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section
14, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the third principal meridian,
as measured along the West and South lines thereof), in Cook County,
Illinois.
Parcel 4
The West 283.21 Feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section
14, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the third principal meridian,
as measured along the South line thereof, (excepting therefrom the South
435,00 feet thereof, as measured along the West line thereof, and also
excepting therefrom the North 127.09 feet of the South 562.09 feet of
the West 63.21 feet thereof, as measured along the West and South lines
thereof, and also excepting therefrom that part thereof lying Northerly
of a line described as follows: Beginning at a point in the East line
of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of section 14 aforesaid, 210.03
feet (measured along siad East line) South of the Northeast corner of
said Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4; and running thence West along
a line which is 210.0 feet South of (measured at right angles to) and
parallel with the North line of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast I/L,
a distance of 702.09 feet; thence running Southwesterly for a distance
of 630.50 feet, more or less, to a point on the West line of said South-
east 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4, which point is 313.80 feet South of the
Northwest corner of said Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of section
14, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the third principal meridian,
in the Cook County, Illinois).
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER KYCI
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89, LOUIS BOSCO
LOCATION: 1796 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (WATERFALL RESTAURANT)
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1939
At the January 21, 1989 meeting, the Village Board reviewed the
Zoning Board of Appeals recommendation to rezone the property at
1796 South Elmhurst Road from a B-3 District to a B-4 District, and
grant a Special Use permit for a drive-thru restaurant. The
Village Board concurred with the recommendation of approval from
the Zoning Board, and instructed that the necessary ordinances be
prepared.
While preparing the ordinances, the staff found that the legal
description on the application was incorrect. The public notice
was published with this incorrect legal description. Considering
this error, the public hearing must be republished, using the
proper legal description. This will cause a delay in bringing this
matter back to the Village Board.
The petitioner has been advised of this matter, and we will process
this request as quickly as possible.
DMC: hg
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNED. -
SUBJECT: ZBA-9-V-89, JOSEPH HOLIK
LOCATION: 808 EDGEWOOD LANE
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1989
The applicant is requesting a variation in order to allow an
addition to an existing 2 -car garage. The variation would create
a 4 -car garage of approximately 1200 square feet. The Zoning
Ordinance permits a 2 -car garage of 600 square feet. Also
requested is a variation to allow a 45 foot driveway width at the
garage door instead of the maximum 21 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals heard these requests at their February 23 regular meeting.
Mr. Holik presented his case stating that he would like to store
two collector cars in this new garage addition. He presently
stores one of them next to the garage on a parking pad, however,
he has had vandalism problems in the past as a result. fie informed
the Board that to store these two cars in a storage warehouse
facility is very expensive and not as safe as having the cars on
his own property. Mr. Holik has a 3/4 acre lot with a 100 foot
front yard setback. He explained to the Board that there will
still be a 75 foot setback between the new garage and the property
line which will give him ample room to plant additional mature
evergreens in order to screen off views from the street. Mr. Holik
then presented letter of support from five neighbors.
Staff voiced their main concern of hardship and precedent setting.
They also concurred with Mr. Holik's statement that his garage can
be adequately screened with mature landscaping in front of the
garage. The size of the lot and the setback from Edgewood Lane are
well above average.
The Zoning Board of Appeals debated the pros and cons of this
proposal. They concluded that, because of the size of the lot and
the setback of the new garage addition from the street, and the
fact that there is mature landscaping existing already, they
approved this requested unanimously 4-0. No neighbors or objectors
were present to voice their concerns at this hearing.
APPROVED:
David M. Clements, Director
m
Z
.4, TowrX, 41 North,
'a Poed. in Cook CoUnty,
0.
N
gi
4
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 9-V-89
Hearing Date: February 23, 1989
PETITIONER:
Joseph Holik
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 7, 1989
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
808 Edgewood Lane
REQUEST:
Variation from Section 14.10014B.3
to allow a garage for four cars
(aproximately 1200 square feet),
instead of a two -car, 600 square
foot garage as allowed by Code.
Also, variation from Section
14.3016.A.3 to allow a maximum
driveway width of 45 feet at the
garage doors instead of 21 feet
normally allowed.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
None
The Petitioner, Joseph Holik, 808 Edgewood Lane, stated that he would
like to build an additional two -car garage onto the existing two -car
garage to house two antique cars. An adjacent parking pad of
approximately 20 feet in width currently exists where the new garage
will be built, so only five additional feet is required to build the
garage.
The Petitioner also presented signed letters from surrounding
neighbors in favor of this proposal. Mr. Holik indicated that the
reason for wanting a larger garage is that the cars are currently kept
outside and have been subject to vandalism and weather. Since the
cars are professionally redone (at another location) and resold, the
values are decreasing since they cannot, at this point, be
garage -kept. Mr. Holik also cited his lot size as more than adequate
for this type of garage and the fact that the current landscaping,
plus some to be added, will make this addition almost impossible to
distinguish from the street. Two other examples of four -car garages
in Mount Prospect were also cited.
ZBA 9-V-89
Page Two
Mr. Basnik questioned whether the cars could be stored elsewhere. Mr.
Holik stated that the expense of storing two cars over two years would
pay for the new garage and he has had vandalism problems in the past
with storage facilities.
Mr. Bednar, Planner for the Village, indicated that the applicant is
requesting approximately double the size of his current garage to
accommodate four cars. The existing garage is currently 100 feet from
the road and with the new addition, it will be approximately 75 feet
from the road. The garage is sheltered so that it is barely seen from
the street. The current landscaping can be transplanted and replaced.
The lot is approximately 3/4 of an acre and is zoned 'R -X,, Staf�f
questioned the hardship and the fact that this will be setting a
precedent for four -car garages in the Village. However, no
significant impact on the neighborhood is seen and due to the size of
the property, no negative impact is expected.
The Board discussed the possibility of this garage being used for
commerical use. Mr. Basnik questioned if the Petitioner would agree
to a sipulation that the garage be used solely for the storage of his
antique cars and not for commercial purposes. Mr. Holik Agreed.
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Lannon, moved to grant the request for a
variation from Section 14.1001.B.3 to allow a garage for four cars
(approximately 1200 square feet), instead of a two -car, 600 square
foot garage as allowed by Code as shown in Exhibit #1, and to grant a
variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a maximum driveway width
of 45 feet at the garage doors instead of 21 feet normally allowed.
Both variations are subject to the condition that the Pet:itioner agree
not to conduct any commercial enterprises of any sort in said garage.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
Nayes: None
By a vote of 4-0, the motion carried. Village Board action will be
required for this case.
Mr. Brettrager noted for the record that it is the size of the lot
that brought about this approval and this type of garage would not be
appropriate for most of Village.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
Village of iviount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALSFj HAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEg:�--
SUBJECT: ZBA-9-V-89, JOSEPH HOLIK
LOCATION: 808 EDGEWOOD LANE
?SATE: FEBRUARY 15, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1001.8.3
to allow a four -car (approximately 1200 square feet) garage instead
of a two -car, 600 square foot garage normally allowed. Also
requested is a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 45
foot driveway width at the garage door instead of the maximum of
21 feet allowed by Code.
The Village Manager's concern is that a four -car attached garage
sets a bad precedent. The Village Engineer states that the
Edgewood Lane right-of-way has drainage problems existing. There
are no storm sewers and the addition of impervious areas (extra
asphalt and garage addition) in this location will not help the
situation. The engineer also notes that the north property line
drainage must be maintained to drain east towards Edgewood Lane.
The Inspection Services Department notes that, although it is not
required by Code, this large garage is recommended to have a smoke
and fire detection system installed and connected to the main
house. If the variation is granted, building plans and building
permits are required.
Mr. Holik is proposing to enlarge his two -car, 600 square foot
garage to a four -car attached garage, approximately 1200 square
feet in size. He has stated in the application that he wants to
store two collector cars in this new addition. A wider than
allowed drive is necessary for the large garage.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-9-V-89
The applicants reside on a large 3/4 of an acre lot which is zoned
R -X and is surrounded by other R -X lots. The neighbors on either
side have a building setback similar to this subject home
(approximately 100 feet) . There currently exists a two -car garage
with an adjacent parking pad of approximately 20 feet in width.
The proposed garage will replace this parking pad and extend
approximately 5 feet further east. The property is heavily
landscaped. In fact, two large Blue Spruces, located in front of
the existing garage hide most views of the garage from Edgewood
Lane. At least one of these large Spruces would have to be removed
for the new garage, however, there is still sufficient room in the
75 foot setback to accommodate extensive landscaping in order to
screen the new addition in the same manner as the existing garage.
our main concerns with this proposal are, 1) hardship and 2)
precedent setting. The fact that Mr. Holik wants to store his
collector cars in a structure on his property seems more of a
convenience than a hardship. Secondly, we know of no other four -
car attached garages located in Mount Prospect. Three -car garages
are becoming more common and two 2 -car garages on one lot can be
found in rare instances. This request, if approved, would allow
the first four -car attached garage in Mount Prospect.
Another viewpoint for this proposal is that it will not have much
of an adverse impact upon the surrounding area. As indicated on
the site plan, the actual asphalt pavement will just be minimally
increased. The proposed garage will be set back at least 75 feet
from the front property line. (A 40 foot setback is the minimum
in an R -X District.) With ample space to provide a landscape
screening, it is possible to screen off most views, from the
street, of this large garage.
In summary, Mr. Holik is requesting large variations from the
Zoning Code in order to allow a garage twice the size that is
allowed to accommodate twice as many cars and a driveway width over
twice as what is allowed at the garage doors. Our main concerns
are the establishment of a hardship and the setting of a precedent
in town. On the other hand, this lot is over 3/4 of an acre in
size and could accommodate the proposed additions, if properly
screened with landscaping, without impacting the neighborhood
significantly.
PB: hg
villase af
Mourn P=PL-e., mincis
INTEROFFIC-12 MEMORANCUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village manager
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: February 28, 1989
SUBJECT: Resolution for Construction of
Haven Street Storm Sewer
Attached is a resolution to spend $41,000,00 of Motor Fuel
Tax Funds for the proposed storm sewer on Haven Street.
This resolution is required by the Illinois Department of
Transportation before MFT funds may be used for this project. I
recommend that the Village Board adopt this resolution on the
March 7, 1989 Board Meeting.' Account No. 22-071-04-8510., page
131, of the 1988/89 Budget will be used to pay for this project.
This account currently has $75,000.00.
Fred Tengeson,
Prcjact Engineer
I concur with with the above recommendation
Chuck Sencic,
Director of Inspection Services
Q&A/r"
FerYe-rt L. Weeks,
Director of Public Works
rT/m
c: Carol Fields, Village Clerk
0
UIllinois Departn. —it Resolution for Improveme,., by Municipality Construction
�91 of Transportation Under the Illinois Highway Code
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the
Soloold of Ttwloo.00
3LiLllaae of Mount Prospect
Cay. Ton w viva" Illinois
that the following described street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Code:
Name of Thoroughfare
Route
From
To
Haven Street
Douglas Street
Meier Road
UV- i j run i nr_ri MC.-JULVED,
1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of the installation of Storm Sewer
and all incidental work.
and shall be constructed
and be designated as Section 88-00101-00—ss
feet wide
2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional) sum of
Forty One Thousand Dollars 41,000.00 for the
.nprovement of said section from the municipality's allotment of Motor Fuel Tax funds.
That work shall be done by
Contract
* and,
Ispowly C."U44t or Gay labor)
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clark Is hereby directed to transmit two certified copies of this resolution to
he district office of the Department of Transportation:
APPROVED
O -P-11-1 at To atosp. tawn
0,.m.t Ciog.n
iLR 4 103 (Rev. 6/861
_494-0352
r A rr) 1 -F-ip-Ld _q Village Clerk
Mrs. (0111. took M V.11.g.)
in and for the Village of Mount Prospect
(Ca". Tan,
County of Cook hereby certify the foregoing
to be a true, perfect and complete copy ofa , resolution adopted by
the Mivor an(f Bn x of
Trustees
(a -M -J 0 Pr -0-1 ..d B",d aj Tf.ai-sl
March 7r 1;9 89
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF. I have hereun o set my hand and seal this
ay of Marcp —.A.D. 19 89
(SEAL)
Village Clark.
1c.q. T—.. . vw)
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM LC H F 89,-5
ronva
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: RONALD W. PAVLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR BID WAIVER RE: C.A.D. EQUIPMENT PURCHASE
DATE: 20 FEBRUARY 89
The Police Department is requesting a bid process waiver to
purchase a Motorola KDT480 mobile data terminal. The KDT480 is
the in -squad component part of the Computer Aided Dispatch
(C.A.D.) system used by Northwest Central Dispatch and the
department to transmit police service call and field contact
information. The purchase of this unit was specifically budgeted
in FY88-89 and funds are available at this time.
The department currently has equipped every marked police and
community service officer vehicle with a KDT480 mobile data
terminal. This ensures the full operational integrity of the
C.A.D. system. The KDT480 unit proposed for purchase was
designated originally to be used as a spare unit. Now, with the
pending increase in the police fleet, this terminal will be used
as a primary unit.
The current C.A.D. system is a Motorola system and all hardware
and software products in operation are of Motorola specification,
design, and manufacture. There are no other mobile data
terminals currently available that are compatable with the
Motorola system. To adapt an alternative product for use in this
system, if possible, would require equipment and programming
revisions at a cost that would exceed any original purchase
savings.
The current C.A.D. maintenance and service agreements are with
Motorola and Motorola supported service facilities. An
alternative product would violate existing agreements and would
necessitate the negotiation of a separate service agreement with
another service vendor.
The C.A.D. system is experiencing more hardware problems as the
mobile data terminal equipment ages. However, the service
facility, by being able to interchange component parts, can
diagnose problems more quickly, can replace malfunctioning parts
from spare units, and can better maintain the operational
integrity of the C.A.D. system.
Finally, the department is satisfied with the performance and
reliability of the Motorola KDT480 mobile data terminal and
believes it is a cost effective purchase at a price of $4,173.00.
This price is a negotiated price and is significantly lower than
the original cost quotation of $4,500.00.
For these reasons the Police Department recommends that the
Village Board of Trustees grant a bid process waiver for the
purchase of this product.
cc: Deputy Chief Richardson
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: MICHAEL E. JANONIS, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER
RE: Historical Society Lease
DATE: MARCH 3, 1989
Attached please find a copy of the proposed lease between the
Village of Mount Prospect and the Mount Prospect Historical
Society. This final version has evolved from numerous drafts and
negotiations that have taken place between the parties.
The lease term will be for a period not to exceed 99 years. The
length and detail contained in the lease will serve to protect the
rights and obligations of each party in the years to come. By
addressing all conceivable issues we are likely to avoid problems
in the future when memories have faded and administrations change.
Under the terms of the lease the Historical Society is largely
responsible for the ongoing maintenance and renovation of the
building. The Village will supply snow and ice removal from the
surrounding sidewalks and occasional tree and shrub trimming as
well as retain oversight of the improvements made to the building.
V1n ls
7
Assistantage Manager
MEJ/caf
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN LEASE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCIETY
AND THE VILIAgE OF MQUNT pgogip=
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect, through the co-operate effort of the residents,
businesses and Mount Prospect Historical Society have purchased the
property commonly known as 101 - 103 South Maple Street which
property will be the permanent location of the Mount Prospect
Historical Museum; and
WHEREAS, the mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect have determined that it would be in the best interest of
the Village to lease the property located at 101 -103 South Maple
Street to the Mount Prospect Historical Society for a period of 99
years.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
U!2110N ONS That the Mayor is hereby authorized and the Village
Clerk directed to attest her signature on the Lease Agreement, a
copy of which is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
5ECTIQN, jWg: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Carolyn H. Krause
Mayor
1 1989.
This Lease is made between the Mount Prospect, a municipal corporation
(called ,he "Village" herein) and the Mount Prospect Historical Society of Elk Grove
and Wheeling Townships, a not-for-profit organization (called the "Society" herein)
for use of the Village -owned property commonly known as 101-103 South Maple
Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois, for the purpose of maintaining and operating the
Society's offices; Historical Museum; public meeting space and ancillary commercial
use.
Background�
The Village and Society have had a long history of cooperation and mutual support
which has included periodic monetary grants from the Village to the Society. In
m/s regard, the Village has pledged to support the Society in its search for a
permanent site for Society offices and Historical Museum. To that end, the Village
entered into a contract and purchased the property commonly known as 101-103
South Maple 5t,cet, Mount Prospect, Illinois from the First Chicago Bank of Mount
r"oopert' Proceeds for the purchase of the property came from a fund-raising
campaign co-sponsored by the Village and the Society. Additionally, the fund-raising
campaign sought to establish an operations and maintenance fund to underwrite the
cost of renovating and restoring the single-family home on the site.
). Lease. The Village hereby leases mthe Society, and the Society hereby leases
from the Village the property commonly known an 101-103 South Maple Street,
Mount Prospect, Illinois, which property includes the existing single-family home,
carriage house, hayloft and adjoining front, ,ea, and side yard" all as depicted by
the nvp'ey attached xrreu, as Exhibit "/v' (hereinafter called "the premises") for a
maximum period of ninety-nine (yy) years, beginning and
ending for the purpose of maintaining and operating the
premises as the permanent site of the Society's offices, public Historical Museum
and public meeting space; for the presentation and display of historical artifacts
and displays, periodic entertainment and lectures to the public, ancillary areas
usable for storage of historical artifacts, equipment and supplies; the sale of
refreshments including liquor as permitted by law; and for complementary
commercial purposes directed at raising funds for the Society's ongoing operation
and maintenance. At the expiration of the term of this Lease, the parties may,
upon mutual agreement, extend this lease for an equal or lesser time period under
terms and conditions mutually agreeable to the parties.
2. Rent. The Society a8rcco to pay to the Village as rent, the sum of one dollar
($1.00) per year, which sum in due and payable upon the execution of this lease and
at each subsequent yearly anniversary of the execution of this Loaue. Rent is
payable to the Village in care of the Village Manager's Office.
]. Acceptance and Condition of Premises. The Society accepts the premises 'as
is, where is'" at its own risk and cxprn,,/ the Village makes no representation or
warranty, express or implied, as to the condition of the premises.
4. Renovation and Restoration of the P,cmiscn. The Society will, at its n=n cost
and expense, undertake any steps necessary ,o renovate and restore the premises to
a condition suitable for the purpose for which this Lease was entered into. At a
minimum' the Society agrees to bring the premises into compliance with current
applicable Village Code requirements (including but not limited ,o pub//c access and
Life -Safety Codes). Said renovation and restoration shall commence immediately
upon the execution of this Lease or as sono thereafter as is practicable.
All plans and specifications for renovation and restoration shall be submitted to the
Village for approval prior to the commencement of any work. Any requirements
for building permits shall be complied with, except that any fees, bonds, letters of
credit o, other guarantees required by Village Code are hereby waived. Additionally,
any contractor doing work on the premises ,hail secure business and/or contractors
licenses as required by Code, except that any related license fee is also hereby
waived.
The vi11ug, may, from time to time, at its sole discretion, provide funds,
professional and/o, technical support or other in-kind assistance to the Society for
the purpose of facilitating said renovation and restoration.
Page One of Four
n. Maintenance and Care of Premises.
( willits own cost and expense, keep
the premises in a neat, clean, safe and sanitary condition, including all sweeping
and removal of debris, and comply With all applicable laws and regulations of the
State of Illinois and the United States and the Ordinances and regulations of the
Village and with directions of governmental inspectors. The Society will not permit
any damage or injury to the premises, permit the escape of any objectionable noise
or odor, overload the floors or maintain any use that would be inconsistent with
the purposes of this Lease. The Village shall be responsible for maintenance of the
sidewalks surrounding the property and any on-site parking area including snow and
ice removal and repairs. The Village shall also be responsible for regular turf
mowing and periodic tree and shrub trimming. All other maintenance and grounds -
keeping items shall remain the responsibility of the Society.
(b) will maintain the premises making all needed
repairs (including window breakage) at its sole cost and expense. All repairs over
the amount of $500 shall be subject to the prior written approval of the Village.
Any requirements for permits, bonds, guarantees, etc., shall be handled consistent
with the requirements set out in Section 4 of this Lease.
(c) Alterations. The Society, at no expense to the Village, may remodel or make
improvements to the premises. All alterations, additions o, improvements shall be
subject to the prior written approval of the viUaBu
(d) Access. The Village reserves for itself, its officers, employees, agents and
contractors, Ircc access to the premises, upon proper noticeto the Society, at all
reasonable times to, the purpose of inspecting, cleaning or max/ng repairs, additions
or alterations to the premises, but this /ight shall not be construed as a promise or
undertaking by the Village to do any of the foregoing. For this purpose, the
Society shall provide the Village with a key to all locks to all doors and entrance
ways.
6. Licenses and Taxes. The Society shall pay all Uornnr fees and excise taxes' if
any, covering its activities on the prem/vrs. The Society shalt, at all times,
maintain its not-for-profit designation and tax-exempt status with the vpprop,/a-e
governmental authorities. The Society shall supply to the Village, annually,
evidence of such designation and status by submitting to the Village copies of the
Society's yearly tax returns and "Annual report of charitable organizations" and such
other filings and reports as the Village may from time to time require. In the
event that the Society does not maintain its not-for-profit designation and tax-
exempt status, and as a result, the Village loses the current tax-exempt classifica-
tion of the premises with regard to real estate taxes, the Society shall be no1r.y
responsible for the payment of same'
7. UtUdics, The Society, at its sole expense, shall provide, or shall otherwise pay
for, when due' all costs for providing all utilities and other services on or to the
premises including but not limited to elevator service, electricity, gas, water,
telephone, sewer, heating, janitorial, security and grounds keeping /except as noted
in paragraph 5 (a)> and shall also pay all charges for utility installation and
modifications thereto occasioned by its requirements. The Village nxa|i be
responsible for regularly scheduled garbage pick-up except that special pick-ups or
dumpotr,s required as part of any ongoing restoration shall be the responsibility of
,he Society. The Village shall apply for electrical service benefits from
Commonwealth Edison and use its best efforts to secure same. The Y/Uag~ shall
not be liable for any injury, loss or damage caused by or resulting from any
interruption or failure of said services due to any causes whatsoever; the Village
yxaU not be entitled to an offset, reduction or return of rental as a result of any
interruption or failure of said services.
x. Equality of Opportunity/Nondiscrimination. The Society shall comply with all
federal, state and local laws and ordinances prohibiting discrimination in
employment with regard to age, sex, 'ace, color, creed, national origin' or physical
or mental hand/rap, unless based upon a bona fide occupational qualification.
9. Liability.
(a) Personal Property, The placement and storage of any and all personal
property, including but not limited to Museum ,oUecbuns, artifacts, exxibits,
private collections on loan to the Society, files, records, archives, etc., on the
pr,n"ioco shall be the complete responsibility, and at the sole risk, of the Society.
Page Two of Four
(b) Insurance: The Society, during the term of this lease, any extension therrof,
or until //s cancellation, shall be covered by the Village under its insurance plan
for general comprehensive liability, fire and extended coverage insurance in the
amounts and within the limits of the plan then in force at the time of any
casualty. No other insurance coverage of any kind whatsoever maintained by the
Village is hereby extended to the Society under this clause.
10. Subleasing and Assignments. This lease contemplates no subleasing by the
3vciety. This lease may not be assigned. It is contemplated that the premises will
be utilized as the permanent site of the Society offices and Historical Museum. No
other use, except those identified herein are permissible without the prior written
approval of the Village.
||. Condemnation. D the whole or any part of the premises is condemned by any
public entity, this lease shall cease as to the part condemned upon the day the
public entity takes possession.
12. Termination. In the event that the Society defaults in the performance of any
of the terms, provisions, covenants and agreements and such default is not
corrected within thirty (30) days after notice thereof from the Village or such
shorter period as may be reasonable under the circumstances; or defaults in the
performance of a provision, covenant, or agreement after notice on three (3) or
more occasions within a two (2) year period; or if the Society shall vacate the
premises, request release from its duties, [i|c a petition in bankruptcy or otherwise
become the subject of bankruptcy or receivership proceedings; o, ,hpv1d the Society
materially change its organization o, its character so as to constitute a de facto
avvi8nnornt' or come under the dominion of another entity to the degree that its
operations, judgments, or commitment to acting as a Historical Society and Museum
are diminished, this lease may be terminated at the option of the Village. In the
event of termination, all private possessions of the Society shall remain property
for distribution according to the By -Laws of the Society.
To terminate the lease, the Village shall send notice of termination by certified
mail or deliver the name to the Society at the address provided pursuant to
Section 15, and all of the estate, right' title and interest of the Society in the
premises shall cease effective upon the last day and the succeeding month' The
vi|1aAc may then reenter the premises. D the Village reenters the premises
pursuant to a notice of terminabon, based on a default of the /c,aee. the Society
shall transfer its interest in the fixtures and improvements made to the premises,
on the Village.
19. Liens. The Society shall at all times indemnify, save and hold harmless the
Village and keep the premises free and clear from any da/ms. |i,vo, charges,
encumbrances o, litigation arising directly or indirectly out of the occupancy or use
of the premises by the Society, or of any work performed, material furnished, or
obligations incurred by the YUloBc, and shall keep the premises free and clear of
all mechanics' or materialmen's liens. The Society shall give the Village notice of
any claim of lien filed.
|u. Notices. Written notices, rental payments, requests, and grievances shall be
made to the Yu/age at the following address: |OO South Emerson Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois 60056; Attention: Village Manager.
Written notices to the Society shall be made at the following address: P. 0.
Box Q|, Mount Prospect, DUnuio 60056. Attention: Society President.
Either party may change its address by Riving the *the, live ()) days' notice in
writing.
}x. Miscellaneous Matters. This lease may only be modified by agreement o/ the
parties in wridn8'
Acceptance of rent or continued performance does not waive full compliance with
the terms and conditions of this |*aor by the other' PaUv,r to insist upon full
performance of any covenant shall not be deemed to consent to or waive any
Page Three of Four
The laws of the State of Illinois shall govern the valNdy, construction and effect
of this lease.
This lease shall be binding upon any successors, assigns of the parties.
The covenants of the parties shall be interpreted to carryout the purposes of the
lease.
16. Integrated Agreement. This lease consists of fou, (u) pages and one (})
attachment; namely, ^ Plat of Survey of the premises.
It constitutes the entire agreement of the parties. It supersedes and negates any
oral representation or understanding that would modify or limit its text,
In witness whereof, the parties have signed this document in duplicate and affixed
their corporate seals by their authorized officials.
The vdlaAr of Mount Prospect Mount
of Elk Grove and Wheeling Townships
B By
Mayor President
Date: Date:
Acting Under Authority of Acting Under Authority of
Ordinance Resolution
Attest:
Village Clerk
Page Four of Four
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
TO: JOHN DIXON,
VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: EDWARD M. CAVELLO,
FIRE CHIEF
DATE: MARCH 3, 1989
SU8J: TELEMETRY RADIO PURCHASE
SIR:
A price quotation was received from a Motorola, Inc. representative
for the following equipment.
SUPPLIER MAKE/MQDEL PRICE gUOTE
Motorola, Inc. Apcor telemetry radio $6,889.00
The proposed purchase is an addition to our other radios used by
department paramedics to monitor cardiac patients and is the only
model approved for use by the Northwest Community Hospital Mobile
Intensive Care System.
Motorola Inc, is the exclusive manufacture for this type radio,
therefore request u waiver of bids. Funds are allotted in the
1988-88 budget on page 93, under account code I-042-02-8012.
Village of A"'Ount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO; BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
RE: EXECUTIVE SESSION - REVIEW AND/OR RELEASE OF MINUTES
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1989
I am calling an Executive Session for March 7. A recent State law requires all
public bodies to review periodically (not less than semi-annually) to meet in
Executive Session, review minutes of all closed sessions and at such meeting to
make a determination and report in open session that:
1. Need for confidentially still exists as to all or part of those minutes or
2. That the minutes or portions thereof no longer require confidential
treatment and are available for public inspection.
By this memo, I am directing the Village Manager to have available on March 7
the minutes from all Executive Sessions for the past six months.
Also, for those Board members who will be serving after May 2, please note that
at least one other similar Executive Session must be called before the end of the
year.
CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
CHK/rcw
c: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 312 / 3S2-6000
N 0 T I C E
March 2, 1989
THE MARCH 6, 1989 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS
BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT BUSINESS. THE NEXT
MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD WILL BE MONDAY, MARCH
20, 1989. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.
MAYOR
CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
GERALD L FARLEY
LEO FLOROS
NORMA J M URAUSKIS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 312 / 3S2-6000
N 0 T I C E
March 2, 1989
THE MARCH 6, 1989 MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD HAS
BEEN CANCELLED DUE TO INSUFFICIENT BUSINESS. THE NEXT
MEETING OF THE SIGN REVIEW BOARD WILL BE MONDAY, MARCH
20, 1989. AN AGENDA WILL BE SENT PRIOR TO THIS MEETING.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT SIGN REVIEW BOARD
February 13, 1989
CALL TO ORDER:
A special meeting of the Sign Review Board (SRB) was called to
order by Chairperson Thulin at 7:35 P.M. Monday, February 13,
1989 at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Members of the SRB present: Hal Predovich, Pete Pointner, Warren
Kostak, and Chairperson Thulin. Village staff present was
Kenneth Fritz. Chairperson Thulin declared a quorum present.
Rudy Presta, franchise operator of Subway Sandwiches, Mike
Washelesky, of Western Development, and Mr. Richard Hendricks,
resident, were also present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes of the January 23, 1989 meeting were approved as
presented on a motion by Mr. Pointer, seconded by Mr. Kostak.
The motion passed unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
SIGN -3-89
T is is a request by Subway Restaurant, 1107 Mount Prospect, Plaza
to appeal the Sign Review Board denial of their sign request
(Sign -1-89) wherein they sought change in color from #2016 yellow
to #2037 yellow for the "Sub" and for the sign face color change
of white #7328 for the phrase "way". The sign criteria
established by Western Development for the Mount Prospect Plaza
Shopping Center does not permit #2037 yellow or white faces for
store faces under 15,000 square feet in area. The petitioner
indicated that Western Development Corporation was in agreement
with their sign face color changes as long as they were a
national franchise operation. Mr. Presta cited the approval by
the Sign Review Board in case Sign -8-87 (Little Caesar's Pizza)
as their basis for appeal. Little Caesar's Pizza Restaurant was
permitted to place white faces on their signage and orange on the
words "pizza -pizza" on the basis of a registered trademark that
was made a part of the official record seeking modi.fication of
the sign criteria.
Sign Review Board Minutes
February 13, 1989
Page 2
Mr. Presta reiterated the fact that the Subway Corporation had
embarked on a nationwide promotional campaign that has included
the white and yellow colors in a standardized logo and sign
presentation of their new units.
Mr. Fritz explained that the sign criteria adopted by Western
Development for the Mount Prospect Plaza Shopping Center set the
standards for sign color for the store units. This criteria was
approved after some discussions with the Village as the standard
that would be used in all stores under 15,000 square feet in the
center. In order for a change in color face to be considered, it
was the opinion of staff and the SRB that the sign criteria must
first be modified to provide for changes in sign face color from
those already approved under the criteria. Mike Washelesky,
Tenant Administrator for Western Development Corporation,
indicated that his company was willing to modify the criteria to
identify national registered trademarks as a qualifier in order
to change sign color and to provide logos consistent with their
national registration.
Mr. Hendricks, nearby resident, commented that the sign review
process should be consistent and that the decisions rendered by
the Sign Review Board should be based on that same consistent
approach. He suggested that the denial of Anchor Mortgage
request to place a sign face color and logo that was inconsistent
with the sign criteria deviated from the,Board action in the
Little Caesar's Pizza case. Mr. Predovich stated that the Sign
Review Board has gained experience in the review of the signage
relating to the Mount Prospect Plaza Shopping Center since the
SRB was first formed in 1986, and stated that his mind has been
changed with regard to the justification of sign face color and
logos. He stated that as long as the business has a nationally
recognized registered trademark that incorporates the logo and
specific sign face colors they should be permitted to differ from
the sign criteria.
Mr. Kostak moved, and Mr. Pointner seconded, that the Sign
Review Board recognize the appeal and reverse the earlier denial
by approving the original request by Subway Restaurant for a sign
face color of 42037 yellow for the phrase "Sub" and white 47324
for the phrase "way". The motion was conditioned upon the
following:
'I. That the sign criteria draft of February 1, 1989 be modified
to include national registered trademark relating to logos
and sign face colors.
Sign Review Board Minutes
February 13, 1989
Page 3
2. That the petitioner present such documentation to staff
indicating that Subway sign face colors are registered
trademarks for the Subway Restaurants. The motion was
passed 3 ayes, 0 nays, 1 abstention. Mr. Predovich
abstaining.
ADJOURNMENT:
There being no other business to be conducted, the meeting
adjourned at 8:45 P.M.
R7esec y
)ull su bm* ed,
Kenneth H. Fritz tl I
Economic Development D rector
Phone 212 / 092-6000
A G E N D A
BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Special Meeting
Wednesday, March 8, 1989
Trustee's Room
Village Sall
7:30 P.M.*
I.
CALL TO ORDER
II.
MAYOR
III.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
CAROLYN H. '(FALSE
OLD BUSINESS
TRUSTEES
V.
NEW BUSINESS
RALPH W. ARTHUR
A. Facade Design - Baird & Warner
GERALD L FARLEV
VI.
ADJOURNMENT
LEO FLOROS
NORMA J MURAUSKIS
GEORGEVAN
THEODORE) WATTENBER�,
Villagege of
Mount ProspectJ.
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 212 / 092-6000
A G E N D A
BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Special Meeting
Wednesday, March 8, 1989
Trustee's Room
Village Sall
7:30 P.M.*
I.
CALL TO ORDER
II.
ROLL CALL
III.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
IV.
OLD BUSINESS
A. Update - Downtown Redevelopment
V.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Facade Design - Baird & Warner
426-430 West Northwest Highway
VI.
ADJOURNMENT
*COMMISSIONERS.
PLEASE BRING YOUR THREE-RING BINDER TO THE MEETING.
�
AGENDA
FINANCE COMMISSION
VILLAGE OF m0Vwr PROSPECT
THURSDAY, mxnco e, 1989
7:3O P.M.
puoLzC WORKS FACILITY
1700 WEST CENTRAL ROAD
1 1989/90 Budget Review - Planning and Zoning
11 1989/90 Budget Review - Inspection Services
111 1989/90 Budget Review - Public Works
PLcxss NOTE: This meeting will be held at the Public Works Facility
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Mr. John F. Dixon, Vi]/age Manager
Mayor Carolyn H. Krause
Board of Trustees
Finance Commission
FROM: Charles Oencic, Inspection Services Director
DATE: March 7, 1989
SUBJECT: PROPOSED 1989-90 BUDGET
Effective May l, 1988 certain functions of the Code Enforcement Division
of the Fire Department and the Engineering Division of the Public
wv,^s Department were /ncvrvvr^ceo into the new Inspection Services
Department. The Inspection Services Department consists of the
Engineering Division, Environmental Health Division and the Building
Code Division. In the Budget the Engineering Division is classified
as Engineering Services and the Building Code Division and Environmental
Health Division are classified as Inspection Services.
The Engineering Division is responsible for iewi and approving
plans for |l private site d ldesign, contract
and bid document preparation, and inspection of public improvements.
This Division also does all traffic studies required when requests
are made for traffic control items such as traffic lights, stop signs
or even parking restriction signing,
Some of the major public improvement projects the Engineering Division
is responsible for are:
l) Motor fuel tux road resurfacing and reconstruction projects.
2> Replacement of deficient existing sewer and water main projects'
3) 50/60 shared cost sidewalk program.
4) Bridge inspection and repair projects.
5) Traffic signs and signal installation.
6) Streetscape projects
-2 -
Attached are charts indicating the volume of work performed on these
major projects during the past years.
The Engineering Division is providing plan reviews and inspections
on approximately 50 ongoing or new private developments. The major
developments include:
1) Brentwood Subdivision
2) lake Center Plaza
3) Kensington Center
4) Colony Townhomes (Lexington Development)
5) Plaza United
6) Village Commons
Although the work load in this Division has increased substantially
since 1983, the staff of this Division has been virtually unchanged.
This is reflected by the following Job Classification.
1983
1- Director of Engineering
2 - Project Engineers
2 - Engineering Assistants
1 - Full Time Draftsman
1 - Part Time Draftsman
2 - Summer Interns
1 - Secretary
1989
1 - Engineering Coordinator
2 - Project Engineers
1 - Traffic Engineer
2 - Engineering Assistants
1 - Part Time Draftsman
2 - Summer Interns
1 - Secretary
This has been accomplished mainly by use of computers and the addition
of a computer aided drafting (CAD) system.
The main additional expenditure for this Division in the 89-90 budget
is for acquiring partitions for the work stations and replacement
of an aging word processor with a computer.
The Environmental Health Division has three major areas of
responsibility. They are:
1) The Environmental Health inspection of
restaurants, food stores, daycare centers
and swimming pools.
2) The Tenant/Landlord program which involves
inspection of multifamily buildings.
3) Respond to and resolve service requests from
citizens, business owners and landlords regarding
possible health and safety matters.
Tu carry out these responsibilities, this Division conducts thirteen
Environmental Health Programs. These are -
1) TENANT/LANDLORD PROGRAM 1889
OBJECTIVE:
To protect the environment and the public health, safety and
welfare, and control blight by assuring multifamily building
and real estate are maintained in a safe sanitary condition
free of health and safety hazards'
Tenant/Landlord
Inspections - 563
Keinspemtfmnn - 1082
Service Requests
Investigated - 365
Keinspect1ons - 511
Resolved - 266
2) FOOD PROGRAM
OBJECTIVE:
To eliminate the occurrence of foodborne illness by assuring
that food and food products are prepared and stored properly
preventing the contamination and growth of infectious agents
or adulteration by toxic materials.
OPERATION:
Restaurants
In - l$4
Food Store
Inspections - 61
Reinspectiomu - 75
Limited Food Operations
Inspections - 38
Re1nspentinns - 23
.4 -
Service Requests Investigated
- Reinspectinnu -
Resolved
Food Poisoning 17
ll
17
Unsanitary Conditions 28
42
28
3) SWIMMING POOLS
To eliminate disease transmission and safety hazards through
environmental control of sanitation
and safety of the
water
in swimming pools.
Indoor Swimming Pools
Inspections
- 20
Outdoor Swimming Pools
Inspections
- 763
Spas
Inspections
- 15
4) DAYCARE
OBJECTIVE:
To eliminate disease transmission and
safety hazards through
environmental control of sanitation and safety of the water
in swimming pools.
0PERATON:
Indoor Swimming Pools
Inspections
- 20
Outdoor Swimming Pools
Inspections
- 163
Spas
Inspections
- 15
Me
4) DAYCARE
To eliminate disease transmission and safety hazards through
environmental control of facilities providing rare for the young
and old.
Daycare Centers
Inspections - 14
Reinspectiuns - 7
5) PROPERTY MAINTENANCE
To protect the environment and the public health, safety and
welfare and control blight by assuring buildings and real estate
are maintained in u safe and sanitary condition, free of health
and safety hazards'
OPERATION:
Service Request Investigated - Reinspectiona - Resolved
Property Maintenance 59 133 65
Abandoned Vehicles 13 22 13
To eliminate safety and health
hazards by
the prompt removal
or correction of public health
problems'
Service Request Investigated
- Reinspectinns -
Resolved
Public Health
21
78
20
Pollution
15
lO
16
Sewage/Plumbing
40
38
30
Stanunt Water
5
4
B
-6-
7) NUISANCES
To eliminate safety and health hazards by the prompt removal
or correction of nuisance problems.
Service Request Investigated - Reinspections- Resolved
Grass/Weeds 64 63 63
Nuisance 35 27 31
O) SOLID WASTE
OBJECTIVE:
To eliminate disease transmission, rodent, insect and nuisance
problems resulting from improper and inadequate handling of
garbage and refuse'
Service Requests Investigated - Rwinapectinns - Resolved
Garbage and Debris 131 173 128
OBJECTIVE:'
To eliminate disease transmission or toxic contamination through
the provisions of a safe potable supply of water for drinking
and sanitary purposes.
OPERATION:�
Water Supplies
Samples - 4
Service Requests Investigated - Beinspectinns - Resolved
Water lS 23 14
-7-
10) ANIMAL CONTROL
OBJECTIVE:
To eliminate the transmission of diseases from wild animal bites
through the trapping and relocation. To eliminate the transmission
of diseases by prohibiting unsanitary conditions created by animals
and their owners.
OPERATION:
Animals Relocated - 170
Service Request Investigated - Reinspections - Resolved
18 15 18
11) RODENTS
OBJECTIVE:
To eliminate disease transmission by rodents by maintaining the lowest
possible rodent population.
OPERATION:
Service Requests Investigated - Reinspections - Resolved
25 23 24
12) INSECTS
OBJECTIVE:
To prevent injury from stinging insects in the Village right of way,
and disease transmission by maintaining the lowest possible mosquito
populations.
OPERATION:
Service Requests Investigated - Reinspections - Resolved
Insects 37 66 38
Bee/Wasps 18 18 12
- 8-
13) ZONING
OBJECTIVE:
To protect the public health, safety and welfare by enforcing
zoning regulations to ensure user and structure consistent with
the area.
OPERATION:
Service Requests Investigated - Reinspections - Resolved
Business in Home 23 32 23
Trucks 47 55 41
Zoning 8 14 8
In summary, the Environmental Health Division consisting of a staff
of two (2) full time and one (1) part time summer intern conducted
1124 inspections, 1600 reinspections and investigated 734 service
requests with 1170 reinspections on the service requests.
The Building Code Division is responsible for the plan review and
approval, issuance of building permits and the inspection of all
building and structures within the Village. The Division also reviews
and issues permits for all remodeling plans, fences, driveways, signs,
sheds, decks and other miscellaneous structures, as well as issuing
garage sale permits.
This year, 1988, 2123 permits were issued by the Division. The Building
Code Division staff performed 8,401 inspections in conjunction with
the various permits issued. The main building plans reviewed and
projects inspected this year were:
1) Randhurst Shopping Center additions and remodeling.
2) Various building in Kensington Center - both in new
construction and remodeling of existing structures.
Mitsubishi
Service Center III
Makita
Lake Center
Armstrong Blum
Stenograph
Network Services
Lot 503
Lot 505
Nutrasweet
3) Brentwood Subdivision
4) Brentwood Square Shopping Center
5) Colony Townhomes (Lexington Development)
6) Village Commons (Hemphill)
7) Hinz Lithograph
8) Gettysburg Estates Subdivision
9) Lexington
-9-
10) Public Works Building
11) Plaza United
12) Gregory Subdivision
13) Chapman's Subdivision
14) Rosenow Property
15) Kathcon Subdivision
16) Main Trophy and Supply
17) Courts of Kennicott
18) Brown's Chicken
19) Gillespie Subdivision
20) Waterfall Restaurant
21) Evergreen Woods Subdivision
22) Prospect Industrial Phase II
23) Peace Reform Church
24) Frediani Court
25) Kindercare
26) Harvest Homes Subdivision
27) Chicago Assembly of God Church
28) Fair Automotive
29) Sun Processing
The Building Code Division staff handling the plan review and
inspections is made up of the Building Coordinator - who does most
of the plan reviews and three (3) Building Inspectors. The paperwork
generated by the plan reviews, permits and inspections is tremendous.
The Office Adminstrative staff for the Building Code Division and
Environmental Health Division consists of an Office Supervisor and
three (3) Secretaries. This staff is responsible for receiving all
building plans and permit applications; distributing these plans to
various department and getting their comments back; checking to insure
all required bonds, fees and business licences are submitted prior
to issuing permits; issuing permits; scheduling and recording all
inspections; issuing Certificates of Occupancy; tracking bonds and
bond refunds; logging all complaints and requests for service calls;
answer phone calls and over the counter questions from contractors
and residents and prepare all correspondence.
Although there is no request for additional personnel in this budget
with the increase in work load and the possibility of additional
annexations, consideration of the need for an additional inspector
should be given in future budgets.
so
The Building Code Division and Environmental Health Division may be
the only divisions in the Village which have not been modernized with
computers. The Administrative Staff have three (3) terminals hooked
up to the Village main frame and one typewriter which has been upgraded
to a word processor. Therefore this budget contains funds for a
computer and computer programs which will benefit these divisions.
We expect to have on line a program which will track the health and
housing inspections to keep us up to date on the status of these
inspections. Also we will have a building inspection program which
will track the progress of each building permit.
The training of our inspectors to keep them abreast of new construction
methods and materials is very important. The Village uses the BOCA
National Building Code as our basic building code. BOCA has recently
adopted a certification program for building inspectors. We intend
to require each inspector to become certified through BOCA in their
particular field, ie. plumbing, electrical or structural. This accounts
for the request in the budget for additional training expenses.
BOCA revises their codes every three (3) years. Their latest revision
will occur in 1990. Therefore we plan on adopting the 1990 code and
this will require purchasing the new code books for our inspectors.
The cost of the new code book is reflected in the request for additional
fund for Reference Material.
Two items which affect the Inspection Services Department are in Public
Works Department budget. One is. the request for an additional pool
car. The Inspection Services Department is assigned eight (8) pool
cars at this time. These cars are used by the two Environmental Health
Inspectors, the three (3) Building Inspectors and the three (3)
Engineering Inspectors. The Engineering Coordinator, two (2) Project
engineers, Building Coordinator and the Department Director do not
have Village vehicles readily available. This causes problems when
an inspector calls for help on a project, the Engineers or Coordinators
must wait for an inspector to return with a vehicle and then return
to the project to complete the inspection. Also when one of the eight
vehicles is out of commission it requires the inspectors to combine
rides and one inspector must drop off and pickup the other inspector
at their separate job site. This decreases the inspectors ability
to cover their inspections properly. The lack of vehicles also inhibits
the project engineers from being able to do their field work on a
timely basis. The Project Engineers must wait for an inspector's
vehicle to be free to use it for their field work. For the most
efficient use of our inspectors, engineers and coordinators time,
the Inspection Services Department should be assigned two additional
vehicles. `
-ll -
The second item in the Public Works budget which affects the Inspection
Services Department is the funds for remodeling the Engineering Division
office space. Funds for this purpose have been budgeted for the past
two years but eventually have been used for emergency repairs on other
Village buildings. Although no additional personnel have been added
in the Engineering Division, the space required for computers and
the CAD system has increased. Also additional space is required for
record keeping. There is an existing wall in the Engineering office
which is along a stairwell used when this building was still a bank.
The stairwell is no longer used and the wall could be removed to give
the Engineering office additional room.
600
580
400
300
200
100
0
STREET RESURFACING PROGRAM
517.475
496.900
1.100
317.250
294.270
4.16 4.02
3.50
JAL
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
FISCAL YEAR
® DOLLARS SPENT ® MILES IMPROVED
STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
900
800 738.&50
700
600
A
w
� S00 ,
p 480
300
192.370 199.220
200
125.150 112.515
100
0
1984 1985 1988 1987 1988
FtSCAL YEAR
200
190
160
170
160
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
s0
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
CURB AND GUTTER REPAIRS
1984 1985 1985 1987 1988
100
90
80
70
80
50
40
30
20
10
0
CATCHBASIN AND INLET REPAIRS
1984 1985 19" 1957 19"
FISCAL YEAR
1500
1400
1300
1200
1100
TOTAL STREET REPAIRS
.7l1f
1984 1985 1986
FISCAL YEAR
DOUARS SPEW
1987 1988
T
oo`
00
s
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
SHARE THE COST SIDEWALK PROGRAM
71.490.00
34.690.00 35.860.00
NN
29.160.00 31.365.00
NX N
1984 1985 1986
Fiscal Year
1987 1988
150
140
130
120
110
100
90
80
70
b0
50
40
30
20
10
0
1
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
FISCAL YEAR
0=0
.idol
3000
f•#
C
BUILDING PERMITS ISSUED
2.407
2.118 2.124
1.761
1.206
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Yeam
500
Em
Km
200
100
0
SIGN PERMITS ISSUED
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Years
ipm
9
8
7
6
n
v
c
3 5
0
r
4
3
2
1
0
PERMIT INSPECTIONS
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Years
100
90
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
REHAB INSPECTIONS
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Years
100
90
60
r
as
�c
° 50
o—
o
v
40
30
20
10
0
CONSTRUCTION VALUATION
26.605.387
122.339.529
33,598.048
40,722,446
55.918,360 I
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Years
1000
900
800
700
.. 600
a
o 500
o�
400
300
200
100
0
INSPECTION SERVICES
FEES COLLECTED
650.936
371.513
334,938
218.758 244,511
1984 1985 1986 1987 1988
Years
500
400
v 1964 Yeah
40
.. 30
n
aM
as
a
Q 0
20
10
0
PLAN REVIEW FEES
36,681
34,083
28.912
20.317
17,242
1984 1985 1986 1987 1981
Years
8
7
6
2
1
0
1984
WARRANT FEES
4.125
575
1985 1986 1987 1988
Years