HomeMy WebLinkAbout3894_001CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4014
Next Resolution No. 54-88
AGENDA
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
O R D E R OF B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center January 3, 1989
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P.M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Carolyn Krause
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Norma Murauskis
Trustee Gerald Farley Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Van Geem
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, December 20, 1988
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. Appointments
B. Announcements
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 68-V-88, 506 W. Lonnquist Boulevard
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 506 WEST LONNQUIST
BOULEVARD
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
MODIFICATION FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 3 NORTH WESTGATE ROAD
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH AN
ENHANCED 9-1-1 EMERGENCY TELEPHONE SYSTEM AND
TO PROVIDE A METHOD OF FUNDING SUCH A SYSTEM
(Exhibit A)
(Exhibit B)
(Exhibit C)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. public Hearing - Elk Grove Taxi, Inc.
Pursuant to Chapter 11, Section 11.1103 of the
Mount Prospect village code, a public hearing is
required to be held upon proper notice as pact of
the review process of the application of Elk Grove
Tani, Inc. for a corporate taxicab license to
operate taxicabs in Mount Prospect. . (Exhibit o)
B. ZBu 69 -SU -88 , 30 North Main Street
Central Plaza Shopping Center
The Applicants are requesting a special use permit
in order to allow a game room amusement arcade in
the Central Plaza Shopping Center. The Zoning
Board of Appeals has voted 2-5 to deny this request. (Exhibit E)
C. Zaa 70-v-88 , 1400 oleveo Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a 4' separation between a detached garage and the
principal structure instead of the 10' required by
code. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit e)
D. Purchase of Property , l a 5 South Pine Street
1. AN ouozmAmcE AoToDuzZzmo THE AcOvzozTzoN OF
PnoeEmzY zomonGu COmoEmmArzom OR nToamwzoE (Exhibit G)
FOR rooLzc raRmzmm
z' AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF
REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT (Exhibit H)
X. vzLLuoo MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bid Results:
1. Purchase of Cable Television Equipment
B. Status Report
XI. ANY or000 ooezmoSe
A. Accept Public Improvements:
Sanitary Sewer uoceooioq, 805 S. mdgewnod Lane
B. Plat of Subdivision - Lexington old ocobaru
The Petitioner requests approval of a plat to develop
a 332 home oonn000ity on property which was previously
known as the "Sporty Nine" Golf Course.
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - LITIGATION
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DECEMBER 20, 1988
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Krause called the regular meeting of the Mayor CALL TO ORDER
and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
to order at 7:35 p.m.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Krause
Trustee Gerald Farley
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Norma Murauskis
Trustee George Van Geem
Absent: Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Murauskis.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved APPROVE MINUTES
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the
Mayor and Board of Trustees held December 6, 1988.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van
Geem, moved APPROVE BILLS
to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$1,245,581
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
84,879
Community Development Block Grant Fund
3,559
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
47,702
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
172,105
Parking System Revenue Fund
5,855
Risk Management Fund
33,544
P. W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P. W. Facility Construction Fund B
278,291
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
15,295
Special Service Area Const. #5
109,922
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
305,361
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1986)
-
Debt Service Funds
411,066
Flexcomp Trust Fund
5,921
Escrow Deposit Fund
60,300
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
$2,779,381
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros,
Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS -CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
There were no citizens wishing to appear before the Mayor COMMUNICATIONS/
and Board of Trustees. PETITIONS
MAYOR'S REPORT
POLICE DEPARTMENT
Mayor Krause, along with Police Chief Ronald Pavlock
PRESENTATION
and Village Manager 'John Fulton Dixon, announced the
recipient of the Mount Prospect Police Department's
Officer of the Year Award as well as the runners up.
The runners up included Officers John Dahlberg, Ted
Gorski and Robert Rzepecki. All of these Officers
had received numerous citations and letters of
,recommendation during the previous year as well as
being named "Officer of the Quarter." The Officer of
the Year Award was given to David Behun for his
outstanding contributions to the Mount Prospect
Police Department over the past year. Officer Behun,
also received numerous citations and letters of
:recommendation throughout the past year. Village
Manager John Fulton Dixon presented Officer Behun
with a check recognizing his outstanding performance.
Mayor Krause congratulated all of the Officers on
their achievement and noted that Mount Prospect has
one of the finest Police Departments in the northwest
suburbs.
RESOLUTION/HOLIDAYS
A Resolution was presented sending all citizens of
the Village of Mount Prospect sincere wishes for a
Merry Christmas and a very Happy New Year.
RESOLUTION NO. 51-88
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Farley moved
to adopt Resolution No. 51-88.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem.
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PROCLAMATION: PROSPECT
Mayor Krause presented a Proclamation recognizing
H. S. MARCHING BAND
the marching Blue Knights of Prospect High School for
their many achievements in excellence for music and
marching performances including being invited to
London, England to participate with seven other bands
:From around the world in the Youth Music for the
World Parade on New Year's Eve.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 65-V-88
ZBA 65-V-88, 1905 Wood Lane
1905 Wood Lane
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
allows a 10 toot exterior side yard instead of the
required 20 feet; a 5 foot interior side yard instead
of the required 10 feet; and, a 3 foot rear yard
instead of the required 15 feet.
ORD. NO. 4007
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
for the passage of Ordinance No. 4007.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1905 WOOD LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would amend the Comprehensive Plan (Land Use Plan) of
the Village in its entirety.
ORD. NO. 4008 Trustee Floros, seconded by
Trustee Murauskis, moved for passage Ordinance No.
X008.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Page Two
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that would
make certain amendments to the annual budget adopted for
fiscal year commencing May 1, 1988 and ending April 30,
1989.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4009.
AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE
ANNUAL BUDGET ADOPTED FOR FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING
MAY 1, 1988 AND ENDING APRIL 30, 1989
Upon roll call: Ayes:
Nays
Motion carried.
Farley,- Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
None
BUDGET AMENDMENTS
ORD.NO. 4009
ZBA 67-V-88,20 South WaPella ZBA 67-V-88
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would 20 South WaPella
allow a 3 foot side yard setback instead of the required
15 feet for a detached garage. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended unanimously to grant this request.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4010.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 20 SOUTH WA-PELLA.
Upon roll Call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 68-V-88, 506 West Lonnquist Boulevard
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant variations to allow a detached garage 2 feet
from the interior property line rather than the required
5 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
this request by a vote of 4-1. The ZBA's vote was based
upon an original request that the setback be 0 feet.
Subsequently, the petitioner amended his request to allow
a 2 toot setback.
After discussion among Trustees, it was their consensus
to have this request stand for a second reading on
January 3, 1989.
ORD.NO. 4010
ZBA 68-V-88
506 W.Lonnquist
3 North Westgate Road 3 N. Westgate
An Ordinance was presented for first reading which would
grant modifications from the Development Code to permit
a lot depth of 107 feet rather than the required 120 feet.
Plan Commission recommended granting this request by a
vote of 6-0.
This Ordinance will be,presented January 3, 1989 for
second reading.
Page Three
TIF AMENDMENT
An Ordinance was presented for second reading
adopting and approving an Amendment #1 to the Tax
Increment Redevelopment Project and Plan of the
Village of Mount Prospect. Mayor Krause indicated
that this Ordinance was before the Board as a result
of a series of Public Hearings and Committee of the
Whole meetings at which discussion of the expansion
of the existing Tax Increment Financing District was
undertaken.
ORD.No.4011
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4011.
AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING AND APPROVING AN
AMENDMENT #1 TO THE TAX INCREMENT
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND PLAN OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ENLARGE REDEVELOP.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading to
PROJECT AREA
enlarge the Redevelopment Project Area of the Village
of Mount Prospect. This Ordinance is under
consideration in conjunction with the previous
Ordinance.
ORD.NO. 4012
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4012
AN ORDINANCE ENLARGING REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND. ORD. 3556
An Ordinance was presented for second reading
TIF DIST.#I/ALLOCATE
which would amend Ordinance No. 3556 Adopting
FINANCING FOR PROJECT
Tax Increment Allocation Financing for the
AREA
District #1 Tax Increment Redevelopment
Project Area to Provide Tax Increment Allocation
Financing for an Enlarged Project Area in the Village
of Mount Prospect. This Ordinance is also under
consideration as part of the previous Ordinances
focusing on enlargement of the Tax Increment
Financing District.
ORD. NO. 4013
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4013.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 3556
ADOPTING TAX INCREMENT ALLOCATION FINANCING
FOR THE DISTRICT #1 TAX INCREMENT ALLOCA-
TION FINANCING FOR AN ENLARGED PROJECT AREA
IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
)on roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
)tion carried.
Page Four
NEW BUSINESS
Finance Director David Jepson reviewed with the Mayor WORKERS COMP
and board of Trustees proposals received for insurance 1NS.PROPUSALS
coverage in the areas of property and Workers' Compensation 1989
Liability.
Mr. Jepson recommended that the Village accept the PROP. COVERAGE
proposal from Penco at a premium not to exceed $27,208 PENCO
with a $10,000 deductible. Mr. Jepson indicated that
Penco's bid was more desirable because of the smaller
deductible required under the policy.
In the area of Workers' Compensation, Mr. Jepson indicated WORKERS COMP.
that only one proposal was received from A. J. Gallagher A.J.GALLAGHER
which includes the statutory limits for individual claims
after the standard deductible. Mr. Jepson indicated that
the premium for 1989 is *47,348 compared to $45,901 for
1988. It was his recommendation that the proposal be
accepted.
Mr. Jepson indicated that the Village had received
two proposals for general liability coverage from
A. J. Gallagher and Penco. While the Penco proposal
would cover more areas such as general liability,
auto liability and Police liability, the premium of
$303,932 tar exceeded the Village's prior experience
in terms of losses for any given year. Therefore,
it was Mr. Jepson's recommendation that the Village
accept the more limited proposal from A. J. Gallagher
for a cost not to exceed $143,400.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved to
accept the recommendation for insurance proposals.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading to
establish an Enhanced 911 Emergency Telephone
System and to provide a method for funding such
a system. The Mayor and those Trustees present
were in favor of proceeding with the implementation
of a 911 Emergency System. Trustee Gerald Farley
asked whether the wording for the Referendum
question could include the word "Enhanced" to more
fully describe the System residents would be voting
on. Several typographical errors in the body of
the Ordinance itself were pointed out. Village
Manager John Fulton Dixon indicated that any
changes to the language contained in the Ordinance
could open the issue up to Court challenge.
Mr. Dixon indicated that the language as contained
in the Ordinance had withstood Court challenges
in other jurisdictions.
This Ordinance will be presented January 3, 1989,
for second reading.
A Resolution was presented authorizing the execution of
an Agreement between the Forest River Fire Protection
District and the Village of Mount Prospect. This
Agreement authorizes renewing the existing contract to
provide emergency fire/paramedic services to this Fire
District. Trustee Murauskis asked whether any further
negotiations had taken place with the District regarding
an increase in the compensation the Village received for
the services provided. Mr. Dixon indicated that the
District representatives had made it clear that they
would not voluntarily increase compensation,
Page Five
GENERAL LIAB.
A. J. GALLAGHER
911 SYSTEM
FOREST RIVER
FIRE PROTECTION
DISTRICT AGREE.
RESOLUTION 52-88
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
moved for the passage of Resolution 52-88.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE FOREST RIVER FIRE
PROTECTION DISTRICT AND THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT.
Upon roil call: Ayes: Krause, Farley, Floros,
PROSPECT MEADOWS
Van Geem
SANITARY SEWER REHAB.
Nays: Murauskis
PROJECT
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
N.W. HIGHWAY SANITARY
The Village Manager presented a request to waive
SEWER REPAIRS
the bidding process and authorize the awarding of
REQUEST TO WAIVE BIDDING
repairs to sanitary sewers along Northwest High-
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
way. Mr. Dixon indicated that it was proposed
that the Instituform ,System be used to repair
this sewer. Since Instituform Midwest, Inc., has
an exclusive franchise for this type of repair
system bidding might not be prudent. The Village
Manager recommended that the bid be awarded to
VILLAGE SANITARY SEWER
Instituform Midwest for a cost not to exceed
REHAB PROJECT REQUEST
$65,000.
INSTITUFORM MIDWEST,INC. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Farley moved to
Page Six
waive the requirement for bidding and award the
contract for sanitary sewer repairs along Northwest
Highway to Instituform Midwest for a sum not to
exceed $65,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: ,Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PROSPECT MEADOWS
Village Manager presented a request to increase
SANITARY SEWER REHAB.
the amount of the contract for the Prospect Meadows
PROJECT
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation Project by $1,183.
This increase is necessitated by unanticipated
work that needed to be done as part of the project.
PROSPECT MEADOWS
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved
SANITARY SEWER REHAB.
to authorize Amendment of the Prospect Meadows
AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT
Sanitary, Sewer Rehabilitation Contract and
increase the amount by $1,183.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE SANITARY SEWER
The Village Manager presented a request to increase
REHAB PROJECT REQUEST
the contract for the Village Sanitary Sewer
INCREASE CONTRACT
Rehabilitation Project. Mr. Dixon indicated that
as a result of certain credits and additions to
the Village -wide contract, he was seeking authoriza-
tion to increase the total contract by $9,441.50.
Trustee Floras, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to authorize the Amendment to the Village Sanitary
Sewer Rehabilitation Contract in an amount not to
exceed $9,441.50.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page Six
Village Manager presented a Resolution authorizing STREET LIGHTS
execution of a Certificate of Incumbency between the INDUSTRIAL PARK
Village of Mount Prospect and the First National Bank ALTER GROUP
of Chicago pursuant to an escrow agreement between the
Village of Mount Prospect and the Alter Group. This
Resolution authorizes the Village to open an escrow
account pursuant to Resolution No. 3-88 relative to
the future erection of streets lights in the Lake
Center Plaza Industrial Park.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved to
RESOLUTION 53-88
adopt Resolution No. 53-88.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A
CERTIFICATE OF INCUMBENCY BETWEEN THE VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE FIRST NATIONAL BANK
OF CHICAGO PURSUANT TO AN ESCROW AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
THE ALTER GROUP.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Village Manager presented the following bid results
BID RESULTS
for review by the Mayor and Board of Trustees:
Village Manager presented bid results for Police vehicles
POLICE SQUAD
and two Community Service Officer station wagons. It was
CARS
the Village Manager's recommendation that the Mayorand
Board of Trustees accept the low bid from Lattof Chevrolet
for two Chevrolet station wagons for a cost not to
exceed $27,850.U2.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
LATTOF CHEV.
accept the bid of Lattot Chevrolet for two Chevrolet
STATION WAGONS
Caprice station wagons, at a total cost not to exceed
$27,850.02.
Upon roll calls: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Village Manager recommended that the Mayor and Board of
POLICE SEDANS
Trustees reject all bids for the three Police sedans and
BID
place orders with the State bid contractor. The Village
Manager indicated that the State price was substantially
lower than the bid prices received.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
REJECT POLICE
concur with the recommendation of the Manager to reject
SEDANS BID
all bids for the three Police sedan vehicles.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Village Manager presented a request to waive the REQUEST/WAIVE
bidding procedure for the purchase of 17 squad cars BIDDING/SQUAD
anticipated in next year's budget and place the order CARS/ FOR NEXT
with the State contract provider. The Village Manager FISCAL YEAR
Village Manager indicated that that it was evident that
the lowest price could be received through the State
contract. Village Manager was seeking permission to
place the order for these squad cars now with delivery
to take place after May 1, 1989.
Page Seven
POLICE SQUAD CARS
Truste Fioros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
STATE CONTRACT
moved to concur with the recommendation of the
Village Manager to place an order for 17 squad
cars with the State contract provider for
delivery after May 1, 1989.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CABLE TV
Village Manager presented the bid results
EQUIPMENT
for the purchase of Cable Television
equipment. Specifically, the bid was for
the purchase of a CEL MS -304 Maurice Minor
EFX IV for an amount not to exceed $19,995.
This equipment would allow for special effects
as part of the production work by the Cable
Television Division. Trustee Van Geem inquired
as to what this equipment would enable the
Division could do that it couldn't already
accomplish. Karen Giet indicated that it would
allow for additional special effects. Trustee
Ilan Geem indicated that he was not prepared at
this time to authorize the purchase of this
equipment. Trustee Gerald Farley indicated
that he was in favor of the purchase of the
equipment as a means to enhance production
capabilities of the Cable Television Division.
After some discussion, the Mayor and Board of
Trustees deterred this item to the January 3
Village Board meeting in order to receive -a
demonstration of the capabilities of this
equipment.
REFUSE AND RECYCLING
The Village Manager presented the results of the
CONTRACT BID
request for bids for the Village Refuse Contract.
His recommendation was to accept the bid of
Browning-Ferris Industries for a two-year contract
with single-family pick-up at a cost of *8.85 a
month; multi -•family pick-up at $4.19 a month and
once per week recycling pick-up at $1.11 per month.
Mr. Dixon indicated that these amounts were the
same as the proposed negotiated contract extension
with Browning-Ferris except for an increase of $.11
in the cost of recycling pick-up. Mr. Dixon
indicated that this additional amount would equate
to an approximate $17,000 increase in the yearly
cost of the Refuse Contract over the proposed
negotiated amount.
Trustee Farley asked whether the recycling portion
of the bid could be broken out and re -bid in an
effort to receive a lower price. Mr. Dixon
J ndicated that the Village already enjoyed the
Lowest price of the surrounding communities with
regard to recycling pick-up.
rustee Van Geem inquired whether it may be
rofitable for the Village to handle recycling
ick -up on its own. Public Works Director Herb
eeks indicated that no studies had been done on
he cost of the Village undertaking this task.
tter further discussion, it was agreed that the
roposal from BF1 should be accepted in its entirety
nd that start study the idea of recycling pick-up
eing done in house.
Page Eight
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
BROWNING -FERRIS
to accept the proposal of Browning-Ferris to provide
IND. CONTRACT
refuse and recycling collection for a period to
begin August 1, 1989 and ending July 31, 1991.
Upon roil call: Ayes: Krause, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: Farley
Motion carried.
Village Manager requested authorization to increase the
SCHOOL STREET
contract for the reconstruction of School Street by an
RECONSTRUCTION
additional $12,587. This increase was due to an un-
anticipated increase in the amounts of material required
to reconstruct the road. The base on which the road sits
was in poorer condition than originally anticipated.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
AUTHORIZATION TO
authorize an increase in the School Street Reconstruction
INCREASE SCHOOL
contract not to exceed $12,587.
STREET CONTRACT
Upon roil call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Village Manager reported that the third week of the
RECYCLING PROGRAM
Recycling Program has seen a drop in participation level
to 50%, however, the volume of items being placed at
curbside has gone up slightly. Mr. Dixon suggested that
the Ad Hoc Recycling Committee look at ways to increase
participation.
Mr. Dixon also indicated that the Public Hearing on TCI TCI PUBLIC HEARING
Franchise Compliances was scheduled for January 17.
Mr. Dixon said that in the meantime, it was necessary
for the Board to take a position regarding whether to
proceed with fining TCI or to hold fines in abeyance
pending the Public hearing. Trustee Farley asked
General Manager Mark Hess, of TCI, to review with the
Mayor and Board of Trustees compliance statistics.
Mr. Hess indicated that there have been improvements
made in abandonment rate and hold time. It was the
consensus of the Board to hold any fines in abeyance
pending the outcome of the January 17 Public Hearing.
Mr. Dixon reported that the Village had purchased the 101-103 S. MAPLE
property at 101-103 South Maple from the First Chicago HISTORICAL MUSEUM
Bank of Mount Prospect for the purpose of providing a
permanent site for the Mount Prospect Historical Society
Museum and offices.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
The following were presented to the Mayor and Board of PUBLIC
Trustees for acceptance of public improvements associated IMPROVEMENTS
with various developments:
Gillespie Office Building, 15 N. Elmhurst Avenue
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to GILLESPIE OFFICE
accept the public improvements for the Gellespie Office BUILDING
Building, 15 North Elmhurst Avenue.
Upon roil call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page Nine
Kensington Center Phase 6A, Bishop Court
KENSINGTON CENTER Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved
PHASE 6A to accept the public improvements for Kensington
BISHOP COURT Center, Phase 6A, Bishop Court.
Upon roll call; Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Brown's Fried Chicken, Mount Prospect Plaza
BROWN'S FRIED Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Farley,
CHICKEN, MOUNT moved to accept the public improvements for
PROSPECT PLAZA Brown's Fried Chicken, Mount Prospect Plaza.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FREDIANI'S The final Plat of Subdivision for Frediani's Colony
COLONY COUNTRY PLAT Court development was presented for approval. This
Plat divides the Picadilly Circle property into 38
individual lots, as well as granting specitied
easements for public utilities.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
for acceptance of the final Plat of Subdivision for
Frediani's Colony Court development.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Murauskis, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
moved to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:17 p.m.
MEJ/rcw
Page Ten
Michael E. Janonis
Assistant Village Manager
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
P W Facility Const. Fund A
P W Facility Const. Fund Series B
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
Special Service Area Const. #5
Special Service Area Const. #6
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Debt. Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
December 29, 1988
Cash & Invest. Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest.
Balance 12/16 Through Per Attached Journal Balance
12/16/88 12/29/88 List of Bills Entry 12/29/88
$ 1,635,166
$ 619,724
$ 413,936
$ 14,500
$ 1,855,454
450,494
405
6,695
444,204
3,775
22,000
21,487
4,289
10,874
17,778
8,895
19,757
2,349,423
229,990
304,821
2,274,592
185,638
5,875
3,084
188,429
1,297,966
114,586
31,324
1,381,228
25,266
17,459
3,143
243,040
282,622
1,570,472
-
95,263
<377,540>
1,097,669
339,769
16,785
-
356,554
454,563
-
2,094
< 14,500>
437,969
205,101
-
-
205,101 .
1,345,376
95,029
677,785
134,500
897,120
4,221
-
-
4,221
1,149,369
29,614
24,739
1,154,244
13,113,298
86,268
30,515
13,169,051
15,099,604
127,206
28,506
15,198,304
3,313
-
-
3,313
$39,243.688
$1.382.720
$1,6521287
$
$38,974,121
V E N. -S
CLEARING ACCDUwT-,,
P. A. EQNSWRI,
CU'AjY
HU"RU KAMLY
mtx OFTIS
WIL"AS
LAJ'RI,U I�l,,Jr:,jME*'jjlj.# INL.
LITIMANKs N.A.
CLAAK/DAViS CO.9 1 4C.
C.A.K. COASTRUC11UN El.
CUJRTt%Y AQhl- CL';f'--i<
0IS-`.JKSCMzNT ALCiull
OUN&ME L ASAkiAlks, "C.
W. UMJ!tp
PAUL DOW[)
FIRST NATIONAL :3A NK C+ nT. PROWECT
GILLEKNE I. ASTRIANSw IAC.
HLAkTH G HOME INC.
DANIEL HuFERT
HLAKY KAJP
ALFRED t. K&AUSE
PAUL MHUkc
115JIT PROSPECT PU3LIL LIVAARY
NILHGLAS G
.ILLAuu uh "LJUtl PKLl,FnQPA6E I
ACL�juNr1 PAYABLE APPROVAL RLPC%RT
P-IYME-NT DATE 12/?9/88
,IJK,:-!;%SE 0ESckIPTl"': INVOICE AMOUNF TOTAL
BOW RL,uN 1 C In-,
h4uu.00
sob .00
lnw R�dw L411,
stc.otl
XJND PLFUNJ C47L�
jiuO.K
3WM R�UNO L4Vi
1, iuu. Ou
j 0
PARKI K, iiunr !�FJN,.
$10. ou
$10.00)
�!) l) Fc (' % i '„413i
I Iv 0. uk)
hi AD No"Iy4) L4131
615.uu
'12I.Lo)
imp M__ mi%; CILI?
no, C. 0",
T) 01 Rv==) LILIZ
f450.00
$Ivilo.
4U I'S A Fr ME N T ;it )\hUl',0
t 7 i 0 . OJ
7 TO. JO
P 'a Y *! -,- %T .1F I r S C L A i Ht�
S 10, 5Z 6, 2 5
4
PYMT 07 INSTZANC_ LLAIY>
$20t&37.63r
3n -ND C39z[
b 5bo. 0
`,50Q. ul u
d K: F L454';
?10G.0.
s I uj J0
VERF Umv REFU%l
i7, 524. Ou
NU I S A t" fE REFtfu
b760.00
S bt 30q . U0
PAf"LL PE RUC HAING 121ZWob
b3",07.82
PAYRjLL P-FRIOC FILN,'['ING 121291'jT',
$1007.51
rlAYRULL rERI aC FiXINU 12/29/`30
$524.83
tlAYR,jLL P' Rl JO cNUING 1212,31bt3
S31?2j8.31
I352056.47;cc
kt-Nutktij
>904,24
S99J.&t
dAQ Rt: UNJ L3n,:
biwo.cHs
110G.L10
KETURN '* LAROW !MPOS[T
$ 15
t3so. 15
DU L II] F E L) D L P ;'AY OF 1 c / 15/ , f;
53, 8'Y 5. 3F'
011 t i =' f��ED DEP PAY 7F 12/15/38
$9"57
DUL Ij €- ED I E P PAY OF 12/15/86
539.41
L)tj t It± F t: 0 DEP PAY L) 7 12 / 15 / J d
121750.77
DJE T F E0 DEP PAY JF Ul I V qd
54o3.8u
$12,Z45.99*
UIS e Q f EA "`..Qu Kv,6NO
i17615.0C'
$IffJI5.00
WIS -40, ItMENT 6,31NO AEFt-flijl
$5y 7. DO
$591.00
bL;0
;6' 0.06
S656.00
TTU cE;k:FITS
b836.52
(,336.52*
JUPL Pyl( <EFUND
$,-- L) . Do
1, 2 u . ')')
&FFU.Ml FINAL WATER BILL
06.68
126.b3
PPRT of AL SC
%11273.33
b1927j.33*
.5,�,�Nu kr:UN-, 1-410')
i 5.uu
$5.00
L L,t!,�J i I P- 0j P-- 1
ALCI:U`qi`,; PAYe`t9L� AP?RJVAL Rl PORT
MYNNU LMFF 12!A/86
VTN:5.,-< dw'-C�,i�SE OE)L41PTI )'
CLEAKI'4t, ACCjJt,4T'
Opus,
PATIl aTI-woURPS BT.
sTrNfILN J. lWYT
RK& 5Y,TtA
ECHA KO sJLLl VA j,
All TY MUILVKS
B. IOLJLY&
VLLLA:;E jF wour PRGSPFCT
KXIITI%c wHITt
CLL:AR1`4t, ACCf)JNTS
3a, Rn= CIM)
L447 -u
I*La �� Flk& WOW% OISE.
DEL a . — P Nice Py ,"oj cl a.
i �; ]NO R, N ) C 3 2
�`U S T 4 6 L F T `-- iti A Jv _) E P 0 � 1 1
«FFO I IAL 1 LL
BWO q"UM) L4393
JW0 WuNU C355 -t
REI SdUTIni FEE CqI39
RMSPUTIGN FEE CMZ
FLc 04393
REI+s,Pi—'FIJN FEE 031226
RE FO a t I MAL AAT" illl-L
f NV C'
�mwil-
a 7, 500. Qu
05J().00
MOM
3, 50b. 19
3 10, 515.41
h I UO. 00
") 10. ou
$Jq.5u
$25.00
f,
100. oc,
b45.00
S5 U. 0('
S 7 5. Oe,
luo. 0")
$27.41
fliTAL
1, lcu. U0
tuci ,. jo�
$34.5r
S271-00
527.41
uEn AL f%Nj
SW o ."Not
CUMMAITY UEVLP A KOCK GRA'4T
LE g434.01
ILL- MUNTLI PPL P A iv mcm F u%o
Tajj45.Jp
6ATFs & SL WER FJNb
1, i a w L; 4 �.9 j
PARKING SYSTrC4 1MIKE FUM)
>-n4.24
RISK MANAsEMEt\j FUN-,,
IMpE54n3
P61- 1 L E PE i iS 10 L"� F ON U
63•0v515.41
FIRMENIS PENSI IN FJNo
%&q5u"l)
LSLRJW JEPjSiT F-iNu
12447' 1.67
Vtjt Lit, rEP.RtSt'WAI lu'," DIVISI-J,4
GLF�N,Nl ti. JHHN,Ljt4 C=),',ST,(UCTIJN LJ.
PC A �,Lj
LIMIM
$1, TlI.uO
KM KT nl"WY '10 1341AL FUNJ
MOKIAL (XINATIT4
%5CT.jj
b5u.G0*
P',LLi(- t EPll',tr-S-NIAIIC�'-)IVISI IN
***I JTAL*fx
1 t T6 L. of,
Accoun, PAYA9L!_ APPRiNAL Wl_iRT
dbYW-W L)ATE
t Nbuk Pl,kCHASE OESCRIPTIOMOM A"WUNT TOTAL
6GAmAL FUW'� 5,T'i.uO
VILLAGE- 14A�4A;cR". OFFICE
A.K.O.L.
ATWK' W
REGIST&ATIW4
11"Ll.o0
$10i.Lo
3URKE AND R%A,
LEGAL W XVIWS-°
HV
.1,4;11.22
1114ci1.22
0. qxjp,
CXPE"sas
EL)6Af'0 FPA(4LE:
SQ2.06
012.001
Ptr"*S OANMR,
_:'YLOYE
RELuGNII 1 ;N
$ V4. 90
1, 79.
PLDLicz,t,v : r,,Lj;Pf
LYGAL 0
MCLS ._+V
112PIL I.bz
5 121 IV, 7.w
VM 3RILSK ASO PukTELL, S.C.
PRUF::S'ldli,,L
St_RVI'_ES
$30.73
PAID V TUN! ELK
J111; �OKIGHI SEli;P
sic.00
',,-,IFT
T 1501 or.
1,299.06
VILLAuc '�ANA.;LR", lFt iCt
CAL,L__ TV JPt:RATf9 OS
*;;*TUrAL**
7.I 4e 571.sh
GL- -RAL Flji)i,,' SLqvnTI.j'j
CAUU TV ^)PEKAflJNS
CAPA
MEN -ASA IP
$10.00
PLORLPAP I LORPURK MY
OL I K ikv
$14.35
Apuz DIxu!4
"AW Y.ToNfErP
$15.00
S25.L
EL)6Af'0 FPA(4LE:
PAID WTUATEHR
so 5. 01
625.011
KARRIYAN L. tYR,.--
AU61f _C,BLE FkA4CHI_',E FEE
ulp54'U.06
fIv5Cu.uG
NK.L.r.v.
WMK"NAIP
$123.00
6120.00
TASLHIJ SAEMS
PAID WIUNMR
&5.0u
PAID V TUN! ELK
s25.0)
sic.00
A.A.Pili
,T Sal Psf`
KAMM LR
1,299.06
$299.00
CAL,L__ TV JPt:RATf9 OS
***[IJFAL**
l2q_j43.b5
GEf L,RAL F€PiD %2eb'2.07
VILLAGE CLEkK'S UFFICr-
PAOu`,XK PueLICATIL,NS I+iC LFGAt. iilIt, E ?100.8'} SIO—Ho
A.A. J.aIFT PKIfNT NF,1SLEFTER $1s420.5L 3102U.50
VILLAuc LLFRKI5 jrFICc ***TCT,AL#� F=2s32i.3C
AC-iL€€=",ii'> PAY=,3LE APPR13VAL KcPJPT
,YM,:'gi DAN- I21zv1r3r,
tl'-:s(,-if FI'.!f
Iie' cfci L'J`T
rcTAL
.., �,-5
�- -.-. -. -.: : 'P ,--•- -.. .- r -.- r -. ,: „ r ;.' -.'-. t ,.-,f r =.- ,- ,-,.c
„ -. -. .. -.. -.- -. ,:.- v .- .- r .: 4:* -� ..,
-. -. 1 ,... r 1 .-.- ,.. . ... ....
... . .. +' r .' -., .' r v
FINA,4CL J"ePAtFME I
i}tCISIfi'i i.Tk SE;'1IC- IiIC.tAIliT="–J
:: X51
i?
GP'1S IfYT` V4.FlJo4AL
1IL?t',_ `a !IP
E,1J.t3U
I Z 5 u
INc,:JvMtNT FIlvAN"L OF ICFRS ASSC CIAI
"IEE,_ ;:ilO pi1cS
160.o;j
THtmIrV-:it RMA V -K
LX>:- : ,-,
u 145.4::
e 245.
ILLIidUl-S ,FUA
SUBSC, ?'i':'T 1 N
535.00
K:ARr:iS(J;V g tiY Iv'L
iL tVic tt-_"IOt7:
$910.0k)
ni.00
LCI -L -00SI IFSS (Rj,)OCTS t, 6FFIC(- SUPP
�,U('Llt:i
S3 .Oi
533..(j0
NURT:i�-EST STArldl4ERS 11,L
JFFICL
i- 0.44
140.49
THE OMNI JSFR
AEMf t>:,+If'
Sc O. GJ
$2L. `0
POSTflASTFK
PflC ,T;k,;E FOK VFH LIC:
3,3!:2.6?
"$1.;2.62#
PUILIX OFFICE SJPrLIF.-, IiVC.
LlFF1LE ,t�Pf'LIE�,
$77.4;3
a;T7.4R
STANL)Aku KEt l STLIR
F0
$t,6. -)1
Sb6 u
XtROX CtlFCP.
JMUNT':LY LHRGS FC),� 1040 CuPIEK
$514.12
MONT-iLY c.i;=UITY PLA",
5201.30
$T20.51
FINA`fCt- 'OtPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
ttib:�2.07
GEf L,RAL F€PiD %2eb'2.07
VILLAGE CLEkK'S UFFICr-
PAOu`,XK PueLICATIL,NS I+iC LFGAt. iilIt, E ?100.8'} SIO—Ho
A.A. J.aIFT PKIfNT NF,1SLEFTER $1s420.5L 3102U.50
VILLAuc LLFRKI5 jrFICc ***TCT,AL#� F=2s32i.3C
RISK. MANAucMLNT FU 4D
41,:, tib S,9�5
*Y,-: f4 -r:: r�r**vL,** -r**_' : *V:*#****"4c 4: 41.^..`v**4-,"..r##r4`-'r`Y
INSPECTION SERVICLS
:3 F H INDUSTRIES
,I,L.,,L -.- :101U,,41 PmUSPtL4
SIG3.5u
YAi,_
ACCOJNIS PAYABLE APPROVAL Rt PORT
a1o2.'5ti
P1YMcNr DATE 1212'�I88
5120.06
T38b,r,
V¢N-)JR,
PURCHASE OESLRIPTIJI
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
G_-Nt,tAL FUND
2*01.3.3
X12'0.3<
1;12".P)
HATIU,4AL FIRE PRf-i". ASSuC.
P')t3LIi =t! 10;4
$i4.40
X74.40
DISK MANAGFMFNT
MATIrIIAL TESTING
a2,2-37.01
t1,267.01
CL1NN`-Cricur GELVE,t,AL LIFE INSURA.CE C
INJ1 eAN,-FL PRLMI€3;'i
�29 303.
32:3:33.21
HMi+ ILLINOIS
'EALIH 11,S—JAt.
X4,3 3.26
141i�t3.26
W_K':r,Nt LONS L ASSL,CIATC S, INC.
I .3 C:,r-,.
&77..`34
i399.U{l
THOSPSJN cLLVAfJX 1'N SPF CTI"_u SEi,"I ICE
PL JY _ja-FIT .,".;U'KL,:, 7S
s830.2`'
37`6.00
MAC3U,l AJTOMOFIV�
IMPAIR'}
52:.9.50
1229...
h+J00 �LLCl-IC AL C.`:"i ST UCTION IN; .
sT f LT IIGHI RE?LC 1T
$2t842.0+',
F,Z,342'.00
RISK MANAGEMENT
vMT01ALv--
Ic0,665.96
RISK. MANAucMLNT FU 4D
41,:, tib S,9�5
*Y,-: f4 -r:: r�r**vL,** -r**_' : *V:*#****"4c 4: 41.^..`v**4-,"..r##r4`-'r`Y
INSPECTION SERVICLS
:3 F H INDUSTRIES
'�UPPLIC:
SIG3.5u
Fi'LO P,
a1o2.'5ti
MYLA.l
5120.06
T38b,r,
41"ViE4 Pkl �Tt.'1 SERVIC.=
FORM.
b6)2.0i)
5b02. 1`
LION PHOT) S'PPLY INC.
P, ij T- ,=JpPLIES
X12'0.3<
1;12".P)
HATIU,4AL FIRE PRf-i". ASSuC.
P')t3LIi =t! 10;4
$i4.40
X74.40
P'f',RlrN & ASS,JCIAr-S
MATIrIIAL TESTING
a2,2-37.01
t1,267.01
PcS-r C _ NTti,QL
Sii ;` t r<i' T1 ;^i
$22.06
$22.00
St'I1I'vi L CUM,OTL-( SERVIC-S l,'IC.
S- t iii; _
151.25
1,151.25
THt SIOxt:LL CO'?PAtNY
PUJL1L,\TION
$399. GC:
i399.U{l
THOSPSJN cLLVAfJX 1'N SPF CTI"_u SEi,"I ICE
E L _ V I=i P`CTIGNS
.7o0.Ou
37`6.00
XLk•JX CO P.
MP3'J :LY F')UITY OLAN
1101.36
$21 ti
1:<aSP` L T 10'% S
+,=F0TALYr
s,+,943.39
v ILL At �c F WjU A P UQP±L I
aCfl-`UNT`� PAYALL,- APPROVAL Reflf;RT
"kym_AT L)ATL 12/-1111/63
0%. jk j,6 SE _u, RI I i N .10 1 c A f1l LU I T-TAL
GENIAL FJL� , " i� . ? ''U J r L f A X1 j i
5<'r237 01
PuLlCi- DEPAKrMEMT
N! i &LA M " iLL t- j:IMJ? I CATI'liNS 1 4, A -:,-, ; L St i:V
W AT L U A M L 4 i IFN 1 ?-t C r
c i i, r i , I;: j 1 4U'.' P A fL� ENV P t
EVAK RtSTAu<AJiF OFF'., OF Un V AX PARTY
GbAMEAR SE"ICL sTI.S sphvi C
GbVWNWKTAL Tr ST I PSyCWKqUKAL "AM"MIUM
MICHALL j. G11Y vxpv�SL"
HAWEN ASSMIMc-, SUMU-1
GARY NEUMbil4l tXPEM''
FiCiii-.,TT PACKAkf, MACj E 0 4 C v-
ILLINUIS ALL TriLLPHJilCu.
ILL. FlKt: & PJLICt- AS, UU t: S
ILL 1 01S jdVt-41 L� UFF I�- cka I ASSJC, I , FA ; - <' , ;IR:'
JALLJq INC. oATTER!ia
KALI uNIFURKS liNis A, 1"
KENW TA L,E t X PF % S u�
j0N PHUTJ �UK'LY llvL. FI LA
LITQE AMMICA ORF FXQ-NlV
MAGAUM, A.IIL,)'IJrIV-- P.IM
MMTJN GRUVt AUMMUdo WEST ALF --EL,
JUL 'ITCHLLL 3UIC.,(v LOR v k A AL
MURAN EjUMCK CU P. M&A 11
MUKA TRMH M! SS iNNS REPAIR,
NATIJNAL INWAIAML! DATA C"HEK SUPPL 1M.,
%URTHLRN ULINUIS POLICt CRI4iE LATS. Pik L4- S L S ,V1 L ta R f iv 0 E R',-- E
MATh FAST MULTI f,�61J�iAt- rK,!.l'J,,16 TU 1 T I -
NOW Mi. ASSj'- f�F -IiIEFS OF PULIL EM,!11P
NjR f il, P 1 T ', I A I I LiN t m S I NL . two I . ,
SZ f.34
527.34
2,4. 9z
x244.
1024
le.
6101-21
1101.21
2{:4.25
1 21)
sil.0c
:51.00
2, 2uO. 0f;
Z , Z 01 , . 00
;x5,0.32
S090.0
L51.9u
�40.0j
$35.72
$174.23
$175.0E1
'E175.00
llF.Ou
$15.0O
$459.2,
T,459.24
MOM
S25j.97
S12.0,-)
$12.00
1347.5j
1387.`"
$119.0
$169.L
6199.00
$i99.00
5,5.00
565.30
$1W0.0c
$100.00
,I to 2. 21,
S121-19
$7001. 00
h700.010
533.45
$33.45
1'>D.oj
f; L 11 u . C; 0
sizu.00
SHOW)
$40.00
640.W)
f L U. 4�
I ILL V„,-0 `*1.1:1=.1 VX US VLL
ACC1lu�,,T'; PAYASLAPPRUVAL RLPL;RT
)ATE
v -N-'Jk t'WQSF MWQPTLV� lN"lCu 14WAT MAL
PUL 11 E j�VA Kr mF ,i
FIRE: e EMERG,-ACY PRUTECTEijN DEPT.
b E h LiDUSTRIES SUM I i ,
Bluti iNsT 1. KEPqrRs
iNST Q !tDAIRS
CLNTUkY SUPPLY C,1*-iAriY SUN L'. _>
ChEnRY'S PINK Fan Ca APPAL k-,
CHMAW 0i"OvICATILK ScRVIL4 X. RAN j KbPAIR,
S-, i. 11
F910.01
$32.2
i 5Q 6. 0 eC
ao .71
19M.00
2596.02
b363.00
$363.06
.UNA It
$11.9f
SUPP,l,
S 2.07
L 1() 4.
PaTTY CASS - PCQU, W-1.
MIS ox KNoi
$70-00
MI SC ED = 6F S
$70.06
MI SE ExioNsHs
1, 3. Be
41 AL 1 w '_ N s L',
$20.84
11 SC , V 'lsys
4.11.12
Al SC MI ISF',
u3.40
190.224•
MAJUi NAMRS
u4P6.50
W" ')
PO LCI oUA"IAG KcW&L
STRAY 5 -'! JV
16b4. 0(;
hbM4.uj
QUI IL< Ptl,,4T PLIUSt IPvC-
Auw_.f av'I's
$1'x.75
b15.7'>
kADW WALK
vQQoM I
$457.o4
i t5I.64
RAPP 1 S
PA kK
0243.51
s2§3.50
RUFLkl RIJ',bA4
&XVK's-�
$32.00
$32.011
SAVE -A -P&
STNAyo- OV
105.00
S165.ul
SKIM CA.TKA
PH M nPP(_ItS
551.00
UNITED UiFFM MC.
COFF=, t
X54.2
159.2()
V
PRO" Ia, EXP
560.90
WIlKi LMAAS k-AJIA-1,j4W.
SEPAIMr110.07
$1I0.u7
PGLiLt- L)PARTMEAT
***TOTAL**
14,58u.64
GENc,(AL FJ,io
FIRE: e EMERG,-ACY PRUTECTEijN DEPT.
b E h LiDUSTRIES SUM I i ,
Bluti iNsT 1. KEPqrRs
iNST Q !tDAIRS
CLNTUkY SUPPLY C,1*-iAriY SUN L'. _>
ChEnRY'S PINK Fan Ca APPAL k-,
CHMAW 0i"OvICATILK ScRVIL4 X. RAN j KbPAIR,
S-, i. 11
F910.01
$32.2
i 5Q 6. 0 eC
ao .71
19M.00
2596.02
b363.00
$363.06
ACC,il,tNT, PAYAbt-: APPKOVAL Rt�PGKT
-,YMFt'iF DAIE
"INCHAK 0KLv[pl to
[W]ICE t&JUNr
T TAL
0�SGFNCY FIMATIaN
MA.
CUL,J'tC,\AFT
P�O WPL it -S
1157.4a
E137.4o
COMP-llf,4'4=ALTHUP
AT L
s37.2u
I i I . z cl
CUMILIA )IvCuJ,AT ' AF,EA(lUvF
COIN :wD-L!CS
SW -W
MR.,&
FALLIJ.i �-3QNERS !AL.
SU "L it -1
$46. Bu
bob. POO
GFL I I Q
suppi !.,-
s915.37
y915.37
GbVCXlW!LNFAL PER, 11AL TESTING
Arviucl- Q11EQ:
E 2. l; 0 . Oo
jq. CrAINGE,� I ;-.
SUM i
sis.52
h15.5
tvc� L , s; U P A 1 j T L .,U3 ,P L Y
SUM 1
$16 . Xw
A 11ART VnWhj
PHUTO SUPPLI,S
t,135.4J
$I
HEIGHTS AUTE14UT iV4 sUPPLY
SUPWL I .
AUTO VAI FS
I Zt 5. 6,,
ILLINUIA jELL TELLPHaK C&.
CO3-j27;'
$35.72
25"Z 141
$q14.94
396- b j n
$26.21i
59 3-L
?22.2°S
$499.23
ILLIN-ulS Flk--. CHILFS ASSPJLIATIC)q
1; J. 011
ME N� k of I p
$00.03
1 Q J. Ou
ILLINUIN PIKE INS PFC! PIS ASQlLI4Tj:hN
IA! -,A-1
MID.%
6270.00
ILLI'' dis VRUFES�I-)-,iAL FiRt-FIGHT:_KS
A
OU c S
$30.00
s Rl . 00
LATTI.PF MOTOR SAL,,- j C3.
PAKT,
S 4u b. K
Suvt, L- I t
$ 310 . I o
$716 8
INL
SUPPL !, ,
6263.°)-
52!}3.44
MuTJ;'.JLA C'--LLULAY SERVICE INC.
CELLULA 4 PHOAE SERV
540.41
$4J.43
NATIA,NAL FIRL Pk,T. A3SL,C.
WW�Q wl?
$75.71
$75. M
PYHVIT ASYK . UF PROVIDER
EM, LOu
0 J E,-,
$? 5 . oul
5 2 5 .,` "
,WRIONEST FL�CTRILAL SUPPLY
SUP -L I
�s430.3,'
lqju. j
OkP SAFETY '-O,('ANY
�, A ,
S1- 5.64
$145.64
EmIL L. ['IEE
REPA 1 k
$-,5.00
I't 5. Ju
PUWLIX MFILE SUPPLILa HT.
AFFl.n AWLIEs
$27.55
07.55
RCj'lScV',LT JAIVl,--wSlTY
TUITIA.
5205.(00
$2 2 5 . LjO*
S (,',)U,, :�A N 1' 1:1 L �, L A SS CSO.
RE PA 1 R s
20 4.00
12 bo . LY)
DLL JLRLILH
&PjAst
5:32.65
.X a w k S
I � 7 . 12
5I"9.77
UNI ['v:D VISUAL, 1'1L.
SUPPL I!
$-o 3. 75
$6-3.75
F i f- c-' L 14 20-0 :7( T 1
(J- I AL *,;:
1 ),,520. 74
)REEF [)IVISIJN •. ,x,-rrvr�,r-r �-
AWJISLh! MILOLN; MAT -Er lAL Cu. v{UV ;�J,,,}IC C S
40V
a tLLn_,_ __
53J.6U
A'r '
IC6S
ACC; fjNl PAY43LE APPk VAL t<LPuKT
NUV
INV:ICcS
$18.16
NOV
INV )ICt-S
$x5.73
,v'_.,
< i.ASE i?:Sut,!f'Tiil
A, n
INVUIC`- AW)UNT
T_7TAL
sL �; .
Tvt.. 4.:3 =v CA^11 AL I.,Pk, V. ;.
Kc?L. -U;l C'
1%-V. ICCs
. . -r r � . r � ry-1 a � 1 .- r r � -.- n � -, �. v r r .,. K -., -.-. ..- -. ,..
.--r r r -. �- r . :'� -. -r -. r -.-..: . 'r Y -.- � .- .- r v,. -•-' "- -•- -. a �
r -r r ,- r m .- .- ry + r 4 � ,. ,, r v
=.. r : v M r..r � ..-. -.- v
PLANNING AND DEPARTMENT
ALCAT L lt4FUrtrtATlJ SYSTEMSv INv.
a, r :! R
$o0.OL
bou.o0
3gKA ?AVi:tG t e
CO E+;} Z H AY :;: iJ
$3�3 :S. 8z,
$3vr3c'�.ta4
PAIN PH—) i3
rIL
6.99
Su.
ISA 4, c IL,+E.;S
CJ
x4,260.00
64rZ:)u.u,,*
K t:` SLY Na TRU i F ' a S l;VTGtSCD
;i=
8100. OU
$3UU.00x
NU€<I'A _ST H,-ATl.d(I Ai`' C: °v JI TIS t.�Ii.;'u
:;; '}-+_:.
'&1rI'.a 5. OU,
$I.865.00
NUR Fri k,c�pT STAiI).'Ln!> UC.
JFFI4E :UP; L 1 E
$r.3.4L
,o3.42
V G `r C it, STR.UC f I_,')
;c
G'': 3<5.7U
s 6,325.7t
W!-:EELjNG u- LAS, C:IMPANY
t Tt, '0L.Ai I . 5.`i'eI )Y
b9ob.?7
$966.$7
PLANNING AND LCl;4ING i)C'ARTML°3I
-.�-<TCTAL
%O?15.3.27
%-' AL F_. ,.
G. tI GLiP"MUrilTY OEVLP 1T
RLQLK GRANT
)REEF [)IVISIJN •. ,x,-rrvr�,r-r �-
AWJISLh! MILOLN; MAT -Er lAL Cu. v{UV ;�J,,,}IC C S
40V
N'v'ICES
53J.6U
�40ViPV,
IC6S
$15.13
NUV
INV:ICcS
$18.16
NOV
INV )ICt-S
$x5.73
4JV
INV tIC-S
$42.34
i140
INV !LC_S
bllF.13
NCIV
1%-V. ICCs
$155.60
4UV
I NV :ICES
$)3.�t(' $507.15
A C C )J N 1 -1 f-' A Y A :3 L I: APPROVAL RrPoRf
INVWC, Amdu.1
TK AL
01JUIT,
Af:TNA TRULK PART,
PARK
I;19I.34
$131.38
ALUKLUGC LLECIAMp UK.
TRAFF 'iAiNT
,t14.0<
TRAFFIL NIGUL WI.T
12,221.3„
s 2, 13 Q v-
AkLli'ivT,J'. HL[Gi4T`4,
?AKf-
$43.29
s13.21;
ALTO TROC-K, INC.
MIA %PL
a217. UO
5257.oku
0 . ou
0 l)
0ojCXcNlD--i
UO,W RA 1K
W0.00
5306.01
HAROV-ARL
SUKTIn,
Sj4. 53
514.53
F (I!, AL C; it, I I Lt'_ N!AL 3AKERY
jo,--l! H�- S )PRLlt
T28.50
t?L.
CMA 'IS iTILITIcs Ul OF ILLINJIN
W-14-144-62
W5.67
109.w
URMILP.S< PLATAC MMORS, INC,
MW
1105.30
$105.30
G."L. SLAVICE PUBLICATInNs
PUMISAl in%,,
5 14 4. thi
5144.00
GNW 1WORPORATFL?
lArTIRUS
1237.LW
5237.022GUUDYLA;<
3Lt<VICE ;TJ0`3
rm
;414.bG
5411.v0
HtLLLR LUMRLI: CU.
Nov tNv!lccs
S59.60
NOV I NUACES
$75.10
NOV !NVIICES
512H.W
NOV iNV AUS
$55.13
NOV I N"ICF s
`5L77.0x
$595.19
1 LL INL)i S F14L) T-,UCr( zu LQJIPME:,T i-Ofl.Pa
PART;
599.50
i99.51
ILL U4jI S ARL'jRISF ANAKIArIJN, INC.
REGI!)T-,ATIu',a
$--, 0. O�-,
0> .004:
MIKL JAY IFkICZ
3IMNA" RERL
505.25
$55.25
LcWIS INIc-'tNATIUNAL IA.
SUPPLIE,
12.4G
SZ. 40
MATEKtAL ASTEM-ii INC.
SJ"L 1 a`
llIT0,,5.57
1 57
1,NTGJl4EFY ;AXJS
1
WASHLq t�,LPAIR
6136.41
-JToR:AA, INC.
-,A010 P.`3:*S
T260.0,
WIDLINNELLi WICKLUX9 PIGULZI AT!
SERVIM- 9ENJERE,,
SM.%
S?3z.00
PtTTY CASH - MaLIC saWKS
III AV L & SUPPLIES
19.24
IRAVLL k! SAPPLIK
$45.57
TRAWL Q SUPPLIE,
5J4.19
rRAVLL & SUPPLIU,
11.93
I RAUL n VXPLNSITS
$L3.21
WAVoL & EXPENAS
W2.51
IR AVtL EXPLNSE S
SIS. IL)
TRAWL L ExMNY ,
QKK
TRAV! L & EXPE%KS
X2.50
-LL e j V` tL , i
ACLI jl4f� PAYAHL� AVPR.'-,"VAL ',,�PjRT
K' YWNT WE 121018L
-dNQAdhF ObAki PT !J: INVOG AMjH%T Y3rAL
STRE. r HvIllu"
FR AV! L X P r: iN S i -S
Sw H-'
f K A V L f NS
t.I
1237.95*
PLLAR) ' jQ, COWANY
AAmf
lb 1', 7.45
$�+5
PRPSAPEfY
supo. 1
4 k)
kOVVAy 313 AL ANN LIWTING RAI dc
T<AFFEL S la "L KA 1
m.� ')
StLK FANY H sAn
flTK L PP"lsTt l'IA-Hljl-AAN S RV VA.
ill.k,j*
SlAW)AFa kqFf L ijPtQY "L.
PLVI 3Y—LlEj
LIJOK"T CU., INC.
Wh 1, t
ILLIMIS
LAM. "- VlCt
$12.75
b I
LCH `_YA
OAKT
25.7-
125.7<
lust:_
TtkKAC_
TtkKAL-- ',UPVLY LOMPA JY
SUPIL i
a ljn 54
mELIING !APPLIK
k 170. Iq
1272.73
THINGS KZ:",i
�-NGkAVI G �'--,—V
$J4-40
TlKF LQV�Malx INC.
ris
t,3i)3.53
1,303.58
TOM ULLICK
TIM% LHARuL
SIUK00.0t
SIUKWO.00
V G G PKI aLKS 1 1.
PRI ,i 1 . i
S4a5.5,,'-,
PR I " 141 FXP
SOO.%
1525.5o
WAKf,10, LITES JF ILLINI)IS
PARTS
S18.6j,
allPPL I L
il v 3i4.01
WAY-KcW Cj"RACTOvS SUPPLY CO.
PARR'
6234.4v
$214.4o
S TR E: -,, I JI VI S I Q
*,-*TOTAL*',.
$22*1
GEWKAL FU)
P.11TOP, FULL TAX FUND
t4f4o7.'')
CANfAL PYioi. 1; q= -PL. Fd',4,j
i -,,,1L7.57
VIATLK AND SE-4ER DIVISIfIN
AOD[Sul, CU.
AFIV N! IC, -S
$33.93
Aw 1mv qC14;
133.14
�Wv '',qv IG -S
$29.03
4UV !NV,IiC-S
$40.94
Umme,
WATLP, A`iD' St:.7L!IVI�Ij:j
AlErICAN vNVIRJ-,'-ATAL CJNSTkUCiI,%-
(Ahl MOLE,',
AUTivATIC COMM ScRVICES
AwTJMATIC W' CRA SMVICEN
'ur... T,«j( , 1c.
"AL H INOUSTRIG,
is IJC®
C ll n biSfRilLJTjl,-,, PPC.
CLAKKLIFT OF LHICAGI. %OATH, INC.
CL;�:h,'N,-!,-ALFH WISM
CUIPTIlAtALTH MIOW
CONTINENTAL QNK
CUl,'-RLA%J Il;C.
DLAL-qS In MHAlu"
040v INCEMPURAT01
C,Lj,'DY?:AK -ILKVICL STjR--S
Ficin. S; POMMIS 14L.
HUT)Y uF F,jX VALLtY
HUYLI �JAD
ILLINOIS WLL T&LIPHM CJ.
KEN JAMS
JARKL COAPLIKAHM
M01`6,�uLA, PAC.
Pul 0 WA
WRT"Ekw !LL1101; GAS CJ.
PADDUCK WILICATIm, INC
.COUNT% PAY"LF APPWVAL Rt MT
PAMNY L)AFF 121"188
MTHAAE UMORIPFIO,
MOM AMOUNI
r i f m,.
QVINMILLS
So 2. 3i
NOV lN4 Icts
$Lq.03
S22cs. -i7
L I T 1 UN
lz"Or;
LL ,t. l ALL. 4
1-2',J.Ju
RE PA I p
S2,2.10
?I2.1j
Lr L' -1'tlIC:- AG,, E PINT
✓, t) }3 .it',"
�:5k )0
RISC sh hL
*2-7.Ui
5197.x'_:
SUNTI; ,
U3.96
r U A P M" T
0 ti 3 8 .2`t
S 4
F'; :&K Lit I MWAL
M3.13
5873.00
'JW-Jns3j9-)
S4,0115.66
0637-0-1310-A
$76.72
jPE'2 K 'iAI J COSTS-JAWA
118, 919. a?
VILLAW SURE FIkQJ LUSTS-JAWA
W919Z2.0J,
LAKE k -Mc -R PURCEIASt-JAftA
S82,290. W
ptj4.2z
2
PA 1 M
vW932M
11*932.87
ATTLw.Ii
%237.Dj
Q37.00
wENV10-
;237.0Y
%237.u9
SUPPL I
a IF 24 01. 53
1 11, 2,10. 5 3
SUN N It
t 52D. OL
5J,6 6 CHO
10 W L 1
$10. 1 i
6 010, 13
25 3-89
$17.80
CO3-11 1
144. 6-,
394-577•.;
615.40
350-o91
Q7.17
2`'3-'v 1 )
$15.13
coj-w)+i
$03.03
C93 -510L
$41.dg
S390.04
IH buS
S" -1. 0'1
45ua00
RACK ,
68 6-6u
xAjIU P.M&S
� 2 i J. 0 ---
As ph 1 R
5205.Uu
6205.00
112 - H16HLAI4 AVE EMMERSON
M8.45
1161.45
LEGN NIFIC&
W.zu
Z Z 5 . 01
i L L A u JJvr P=<IlSPcL1
.+C. i l T > PAYA BL . PPRi'VA L R'- PRT
),,YM: NT JATu-
I2f f#iI
a t i?kLrOSF "ESLml PT I
WATt, AND StAlt-k (IVIS F', -v
PLTTY LA --- A - P .:�- IC . jF-,KS
PR€iS',FLIY
STA:40AF?u PIP+. - UPPLY iNC.
TLL'--ACi- SJPPLY t_IJti A'lY
V & _:> PkINTEQS I"ii-
WAT_, AND 9F- IVISI');.
,iATER L S' d :tt F'Ji4.`)
1;1 AV L_ SiJP�LIrS
TkAV L `. S-?P`r'LI
FP AV: L SIPi'LI 3
TiiAV:_L #, r,UPPL1.
P,AV_L rXP E N-'�;
TRAY: L cXPENSf S
TRAY _I 1; FXPt_NSS S
'R AV_.L <_XPr NS .a
fQAVL L LXP ',!Si-
-luP#'_Ii',
r'L_. j._..=L1S
€'P:'f [ ,
PRL, i i•., FX(-
PP,I`'3 I,'•,, rXP
$26x,775.;0
INLI':JICF_ All -OU 4T
3. 74
4.^I
i� 7.2--f
T,3A.4I
>�4a45
i�i5.D"
lc,e" t-:
T?, 0 . ou
$1�-04
$Io;51
9.57
,: 1. 5`i
b140a4
$-'o=r 3
R71.3'i
s4,5a5J
v I�%�a V'v'
TI7.0u
* *TO1 AL
! T A L
5jJ; 11.74
L1q,.40
:�tiSa t'S
ti.35
1,637. 5`,
I ,
—I**: s,*.v*:;:*
PAF&IN{ ; SYSTLI LJIVISIUEd
AST Z..i>LAST INIC. 2r7j=11 a f3' 0.00 f Uir.UC
CiJtrlilacALTri 20I3_''t 51'+5 35
_046,>-iF— 37EJ'mA
i lOR-J r- 74`4-A
1.L t'•Ii4 C,J"iTP.1Lr
t� 0ATH', -STEJ N WATER
TI a.ti4
. 8.2
SIBa'�4 g2=ila�?
If9f6.J=^It)75.00
_, 2. 31 %2.3,0
d"ymi Nr !.IAI>- 12I �H
,iR Ui< F FSi i PTI ?" f hUCI C=_ a'n't9ii F
*** rq i AL-*" 121 %I -i. �2
rA.3'1°=_ CYST _}'LNUt1_ rUi g�
„,- , r r r . ,- .- r :,- v r ,- � .-, ..,- Y ,-,- .� .-, ,--•- ,-•- r -P, -.. _.. , , -,- ,- x =�-., P , ,. � . ,- �...- -. Y . , r ,= . . „-, r , , .- x ,=;. ,--. � . ,.. -.- . ,.. . -.- . , -.- . -� -. v r . ,. , ,: , : # :� -.� ,,. -� r ,-,-.� : -,-,
DIjF}USAL .}1VI51`lV
VS P I'.f T.`ti ri:t {,7,2.bO :742.GJ
KL USc JlS;)d1SAL OlVISFiJV *TOTAL** 1,7=tc.;',]
uE N _RAL t -J'4;) 1 L.uI
*r.*�-r,-Y*,--.r;m,-,--;.,-r,=,�*ter*Mr***;<Y:.*rt-v;,Fr
CAPITAL I,q: KOVEM-- 4Ts
dURKi AiiL) RYAri
LIGAL S' kVIC--S-ill 3V
1210 3.75
itx-f93.-15
CAIS Lt .
PA cr T''AY
�`. 3,UJ
{=_'.6
;RILK,c:ti
JF�ItLF_i:<1ITUP;_
1243.0,j
IFFI'-E != 2'iTTUtc_
1Z74.JJ
1�517.
ILLidJES rAiti" L LSI: -#F'R'AY
I Ct j L;
iT533.45
1:533s4'?
attlTJn!1Lti, It -C•
T€' !-::r.
FIt `o O.U.!
FI.'+.I:C0
ST1K1:.'f zAMELL3 D(1.K_KIN
RUQ
S MAPLE PROPERTY i,31,5'r3.13
11)1fF`)3.13F
C 'I!iL T,!PF.CtwzM T
rVr10fALr*
69c;.i
vu t� S
LRPITriL i''P::v• t ` cc OL. FUN,)
a?it' '3.13
L)OWNTGMN KFL'EVLPMT -O':SI 1915
1[at`9.1. is
P It FAC1Li i Y Cuili ,T 19 17A
$lt 5;b. t7
P W FACILITY C(, 4ST I9� 7
$1 v 5S7.01)
LL. ____ :t- � -10 Pr.vLi
ScCL '3 1' 'AYA 4LFAPPts;VAL P'7 ?T
Fd>
INVCICI-
x I Z�-- L ,
CL,'�MUNITY AW) CIVIC SERVICES
F-tTT'a" r #.tE 1L 4dRKS 1P, V:: Xp-.i; S 5 b r'.5Jr
tit^€J iITY AN-" vi`+'`I SLRV1LF-S ,.- TCrAL -` 9a
,A!. RAL FJ 40
, 9.jv
Dt"T SFRVICE FJ.- 0S
AMLERICA.1 NATIu^#kL Rt Dv I467C IN# [)1/1/99 £14,322.5:
Phi Fr:t; EL ITY 19',T. . PkIN 01/1/ �9
Pli F`,CILITY 1537 ItaT Gi/i/89
TP,E FIRST C#;I CAG =A'4K SIF -;0! T PnvS ,SA i1 ?RINCIPAL DUE'
I/I
SSA ,l )14TFe:tST OU4: 1/1
Iw; T NAT1; AL t';. K '_)F MT. P,< US QCT col; ' PIP.11SE l l -i ? RIN f 1/1/:)9
i.0,tP Pi fl,I F- 1973 1 N f :)I/1/89
CQhy "P'J P+3S�- P)73 "A.vK CHG
LOr(P JSP i'i14 PRI'i E3l/1/=39
iOkP PU'.k, 1474 1r�T .)1/1 `}
Li7Kr P-; P 1474 : ANK CW,
DL 3T SF,tViCL FWN ).;
11taI.245.0v
S I 1 0Uu.0C,
:5f915.0ii
$22, 875.0v
t2uu,00Q.0
$„7,Ou0.9u,
4123,00
, : *TC'TAL**
1,27595b7.Ss:x
$16.915.00*
$36 3: 3.GQ*
4677* 151, -j.
CuKP,jkATL l.KP iS;—S ;, L” i Iv73 X11:. :"s. Jo CORPORATE PURP€),ES ', S 1 1914 L247r126.00
- SA >r1 0Cl A AO' Wa !_ .. 1 1,1 a ttP W FrACILITY Ei I 19,'7' "261#2-+5.00
C L� A y 4, t-'. L i Zr''—,T
Y I i', I J A ii: Ill ddb
4 !4 , +_ ,.\ - 1) L -0- -, I p T I j I N V I'l C M,)UtJ T Jio-
ALL �!,L:JS T,,T,',L f I , --. " " , -, ; 1 . I L
UAIL low! U12WW.
—LL -W A'- W1,1 MU
Poli
TI,Ka �J% i6.? -1.17
ACCRAK WAVABLE APPENAL
LISTING
,-,(Jl,l`A,-�Y ,Y Fjk) 12I2918--,
U.
FuW; WW -;F
AM%Nr
I
KNI-AL F -J
f413,936.2,
22
MjYUV fWFL TAA FUU!
23
WAIMUilTY QVUMT HL CK
S21r4i6.89
24
ILL. MiNILIVaL crWEP4iT FUfW
56,915.33
41
WAFEK L sa.zm Ajl-p
63C4,00.91
46
Pe, RK 1 JG S YS I ; - 10 'ME .9
t3" 13.7--
49
RIM M4lmtof FW,
$wv3!3.54
51
LAMY" 15' .V- t RQPL. TU,4O
8'f5q2j2.9,)
55
i),jWNTjwij, K`"EnpM CDAT L915
129013.75
56
v 14 FACILiTy L :QST L 3 jhk
f195S6.145
57
P W f;,CILITY 1'4ST 1 67 ,
QvinVC0
6U
CU"GRITF YmRP SES E 1 j973
51JAIT5.0C
61
CORPURATE PPRP S€`5 S 1 1 1974
t240128.0u
62
SSA 01 P9USPFCr M,A,),045 1
SINA5.0.
64
P W FACILITY < c, 1 19F,7i
i26 1 * ?'t 5. oi_,
70
q! WNTJWI K EVLPMF I & 1 IYA7C
$14,02.5,,
71
PaLICE PLN Aj j FUWj
SJ09515.41
72
FIRLMLNOS Vj
S28v 5J6. IJ
74
=�CitO i DEPOSIT rlPil)
$Z4v 7 H.67
TIITxL ALL FU-J)S
sit 6,52,2,37.31
il " 6! 1 r
I n-vA P I55
Village of -Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: MAYOR CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
DATE: DECEMBER 28, 1988
RE: VACANCY ON POLICE PENSION BOARD
At the January 3, 1989 Village Board meeting, I will submit the name of
Richard Jesse to fill the vacancy on the Police Pension Board created by the death
of Edward Miller. Mr. Jesse's term will run until May 1, 1991.
CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
CHK/rcw
c: Director of Finance David Jepson
Police Officer Michael Krutchen
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 506 WEST LONNQUIST BOULEVARD
WHEREAS, Timothy H. Tosch (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for variation from certain provisions of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for
property commonly known as 506 West Lonnquist Boulevard
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described
as:
Lot 4 in Block 28 in Prospect Park Country Club, being a
Subdivision in the South East Quarter (1/4) of Section 11
and the South 15 acres of the East Half of the North East
Quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North, East of the
Third Principal Meridian
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.102 of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a two
foot (21) interior side yard instead of the required five feet (51)
required in order to construct a detached garage; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 68-V-88 before the Zoning,Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 17th day of
November, 1988, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prgspect Herald on the 1st day of November, 1988.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102 to allow a two foot (21) side yard rather than
the required five feet (51), which variations will permit the
construction of a detached garage.
SECTION THREE: The variation being the subject of this Ordinance
is granted provided the driveway apron to the garage and any new
driveway construction shall cause drainage flow towards the street
and not onto adjoining properties.
5ECTION FOUR: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FIYEE,: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
PrAl
N
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
U FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this --- day of - 01988.
Carolyn H. Krause
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
T 0: JTQHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FF 1_M: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
'A'PE: NOVEMBER 29, 1988
SUBJECT: MORRIS SUBDIVISION, 13 NORTH WESTGATE ROAD
ALSO DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION FOR LOT DEPTH
ON BOTH LOTS
The applicant is -requesting that Lot III be subdivided into two
Single family lots, Lots 1 and 2. The owner wishes to sell Lot 1,
which will be Q8.22 feet wide and have a depth of 107.5 feel., so
a new single family home can be built on it. A home already exists
cn .shat ;-7ould be Lot 2. its frontage would be 107.5 feet and have
a depti of 113.., The site is zoned R-1 and both lots would
mie,et the ml:;imum _-quare foot required for R-1 zoning. Vehicular
7c-esc to DDtn lots -.could be from Westgate Road.
::eq%1J-ed lot dept. -� f
_ej-�-Ir qct !-.as -he Lot 1 has 107.5 feet
jen.rin . 7-3 In+- I
has 11-3.21- feet, The Development Code, under
calls for a minimum residential lot depth of
120 f�a�
1.
The ?!on Co-.zmIssion heard the applicant's requests d,7ring their
regular mneeting on November 16, 1988 and voted 6-0 in favor Cf
_=c, mmendzlag approval of both the subdivisicn plat and Development
code z.o_ifl.-_a`ions. staff had nc. cbject-Jons to these 'Items.
APPROVED: Wo. WwKt/)—
Dav--(f M. Clements
3n 6 90
51
V.
Ce,41 7"o"Z IeOl'fAO,
Tarl;l-,Al I 1,Vd- --I'OV7WeXr7 '5�0' 0,- -?-f -
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
DATE: NOVEMBER 29, 1988
SUBJECT: MORRIS SUBDIVISION, 13 NORTH WESTGATE ROAD
'LSC DEVELOPMENT CODE MODIFICATION FOR LOT DEPTH
ON BOTH LOTS
The applicant is requesting that Lot 12 be subdivided into two
Single family lots, Lots 1 and 2. The owner wishes to sell Lot 1,
which will be 98.2.1 feet wide and have a depth of 107.5 feet, so
a new single family home can be built on it. A home already exists
cn what would be Lot 2. its frontage would be 107.5 feet and have
a depth of 113,2 -feet. The site is zoned R-1 and both lots would
meet the minimum -square foot required for R-11 zoning, Vehicular
access to t,3ti lots would be from Westgate Road.
'Teit-her I.c-- has the required lot dept. Lot 1 has 101.5 feet cf
del -t-!, and Lot 2 has 11-3.21 feet. The Development Code, under
Sect' -.7r. calls for a minimum residential 110.
depth -f
120 feet.
The Plan Commission heard the applicant's requests during their
regular �:: Meetirig on November 16, 1988 and voted 6-11 in favor of
recommending approval of both the subdivision plat and -Development
Code rrcdif1cat_Jz)ns. Staff had no objections to these items.
APPROVED: �" M -
Dav--d M. Clements
3n 6;' 90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16
ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
H
WE9TGATE ROAD
WHEREAS, Elizabeth Morris has requested a modification from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount to permit a
reduced lot depth for the two lots subdivision known as Morris
Subdivision, commonly known as 3 North Westgate Road and 5 North
Westgate Road: and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modification from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for property commonly known as 3 and 5 North Westgate
Road, and legally described as follows:
Lots 1 and 2 in the Morris Subdivision being a subdivision
of Lot B in Wedgewood Subdivision of Lot 1 in C. A. Goelz
Prospect Gardens, a subdivision in the West 1/2 of the
West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 35, Township 42
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, in
Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendation
relative to the modification requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, and the
President and Board of Trustees have determined that the best
interests of the Village would be served in granting the
modifications requested herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
CE "TON That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWQ: That a modification from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) is hereby granted to the Subject Property to permit
a lot depth of 107.50' for Lot 1 in Morris Subdivision and 113.23
feet for Lot 2 in Morris Subdivision, commonly known as 3 North
Westgate Road and 5 North Westgate Road, respectively.
aECTION THREE: The modification granted herein is subject to
construction of a single family home on the existing vacant lot,
in accordance with the plans submitted and as approved by the
Village.
E TION FOS Except for the modification from the Development
Code granted herein, all other requirements of said Development
Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
3 & 5 N. Westgate
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1988.
Carolyn H. Krause
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE TO ESTABLISH A 9-1-1 EMERGENCY
TELEPHONE SYSTEM AND TO PROVIDE A METHOD OF
FUNDING SUCH A SYSTEM
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted into law the Emergency Telephone
System Act (Chapter 134, Section 30.01 et seq. Illinois Revised Statues) hereinafter
called the "Act;" and
WHEREAS, the Act enables municipalities to impose a surcharge on telecommunica-
tion carriers at a rate per network connection in order to implement and/or
upgrade and maintain a 119-1-111 emergency telephone system; and
WHEREAS, Section 9-221.1 of Chapter 111 2/3 of the Illinois Revised Statutes
allows the telecommunication carrier to recover the surcharge which includes a 3%
accounting charge from its subscribers residing within the corporate limits of the
municipality imposing the surcharge; and
WHEREAS, the Act allows two or more municipalities to form a Joint Emergency
Telephone System Board; and
WHEREAS, the Act further provides that before the surcharge may be imposed it
must be authorized by a majority of all votes cast in a referendum in all
municipalities participating in a Joint Emergency Telephone System Agency; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect deems it to be
in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to implement and/or upgrade
and maintain a sophisticated "9-1-111 emergency telephone system and to impose a
surcharge on telecommunication carriers to be passed through to its subscribers to
pay for the costs associated therewith;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT •PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The Village of Mount Prospect shall by means of an Inter-
governmental Cooperation Agreement participate with the Villages of Arlington
Heights, Buffalo Grove and Elk Grove Village and such other municipalities as
shall from time to time elect to participate in a Joint Emergency Telephone
System Agency (designated as the Northwest Central 9-1-1 System) pursuant to
Section 15.4 of the Act.
SECTION TWO: A surcharge is hereby imposed, subject to the provisions of
Section Three, upon all telecommunication carriers engaged in the business of
transmitting messages by means of electricity originating within the corporate
limits of the Village of Mount Prospect and terminating within the State of Illinois
for funding of a 119-1-111 emergency telephone system.
SECTION THREE: A referendum shall be placed by the Village on the April 4,
1989 ballot for all legal voters residing in the Village of Mount Prospect to vote
upon the following question:
Shall the Village of Mount Prospect impose a surcharge of
up to seventy-five (75) cents per month per network —Yes
connection on telecommunications carriers, which surcharge
expense will be added to the monthly bill you receive for
telephone or telecommunications charges, for the purpose
of installing a 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System? No
rA
SECTION FOUR: If a majority of the total votes cast upon the question in all
Villages participating in the Northwest Central 9-1-1 System are in favor thereof, a
surcharge is hereby imposed at a rate of 75 cents per month per in-service network
connection, as hereinafter defined. A network connection shall not be deemed to
be in-service where a subscriber's account is uncollectable.
SECTION FIVE: For purpose of this ordinance the following definitions shall apply;
a. "Network Connection" means a voice grade communication
channel directly between a subscriber and a telecommunications
carrier's public switched network without the intervention of any
other telecommunications carriers switched network which would
be required to carry the subscriber's interpremises traffic.
b. "Transmitting Messages" shall have the meaning ascribed to the
term in Section 8-11-2 of the Illinois Municipal Code.
C. "Telecommunications Carrier" means any natural individual,
firm, trust, estate, partnership, association, joint stock company,
joint venture, corporation, municipal corporation or political sub-
division of this State, or a receiver, trustee, conservator or
other representative appointed by order of any court engaged in
the business of transmitting messages by means of electricity.
SECTION SIX: The Village Clerk shall provide any telecommunications
carrier subject to the surcharge with a certified list of those network
connections assigned to the Village of Mount Prospect to be exempt from
imposition of the surcharge. The certified list may be revised by the
Village on 60 day prior written notice provided to the telecommunications
carriers.
SECTION SEVEN: The surcharge shall be imposed on the first day of the
month following the expiration of 90 days from the date the Village Clerk
certifies to any of the telecommunications carriers who are subject to the
surcharge that the referendum referred to in Section Three has passed.
SECTION EIGHT: In lieu of the telecommunications carriers imposing a
3% accounting charge on its subscribers as permitted under the Act, each
telecommunications carrier is hereby authorized and instructed to recover
said accounting charge by deducting 3% from the amount of surcharge
otherwise due and owing the Village prior to remittance under Section Nine
of this ordinance.
SECTION NINE: Every telecommunications carrier shall remit to the
designated Northwest Central 9-1-1 System Treasurer the amount of
surcharge due and owing for each calendar month within 30 days following
expiration of each month to which the surcharge applies, net of any
network or other "9-1-1" or sophisticated '19-1-1" system charge then due
the particular telecommunications carrier as shown on an itemized bill and
the 3% accounting charge described in Section Eight.
SECTION TEN: Simultaneously with the remittance described in Section
Nine above each telecommunications carrier shall make a return to the
Northwest Central 9-1-1 System Treasurer for the period to which the
remittance applies stating as follows:
1. The name of the telecommunications carrier.
2. The telecommunications carrier's principal place of
business.
3. The number of network connections to which the
surcharge applies far the Village of Mount Prospect.
4. The amount of surcharge due.
5. Such other reasonable and relevant information as the
corporate authorities may require.
SECTION ELEVEN: If it shall appear that an amount of surcharge has been paid
which was nvt due under the provisions ,f this ordinance, whether an the result of
a mistake of fact or an error of law, then such amount shall be credited against
any surcharge due, or to become due, under this ordinance from the tele-
communications i who made the erm^cvua payments provided that no amounts
erroneously paid more than three (J) years prior to the filing of a claim the,cm`,c
shall be ov credited. Ninety (98) days prior notice shall be given to the Northwest
Central 9-1-1 5/stem Board on any credit against a surcharge due.
'
SECTION TWELVE: No
action to recover any amount of surcharge due under the
provisions of this ordinance shall be commenced more than three (]) years after the
dm, date of such amount.
SECTION THIRTEEN: The Intergovernmental Cooperation agreemrot, whereby the
Village of Arlington Heights, the Village of Buffalo Grove the Village of Elk Gnmr
vdla8r and the Village of Mount Prospect, would initially enter into the Northwest
Central *-|-| System is hereby approved. 8 true and correct copy of said
Agreement is attached and made a part of this ordinance.
SECTION FOURTEEN: The YiUa8c President and Y/Uogc Clerk are hereby
authorized to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the Village of Mount
Prospect, UUnv/a.
SECTION FIFTEEN. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner pn,,/ued
by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
asyEmT,
PASSED and APPROVED this __day of 1989
Carolyn H. Krause
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Field,
NORTHWEST CENTRAL 9-1-1 SYSTEM
INTERGOVERNMENTAL COOPERATION AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into on the effective date specified
hereafter, by and between the local governments signatory
hereto and also those which may hereafter become signatory:
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the signatories have determined that the
implementation of a 9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System would
provide a significant public safety enhancement to the
citizens of each of the participating municipalities; and
WHEREAS, the signatories have determined that a Joint
Emergency Telephone System would be beneficial on an
individual and mutual basis and
WHEREAS, Chapter 134, Section 30.01 et seq. of the Illinois
Revised Statutes permits the formation of a Joint Emergency
Telephone System Board to oversee the implementation and
operation of a 9-1-1 emergency telephone system, and
WHEREAS, Chapter 127, Section 741 of the Illinois Revised
Statutes provides for the joint exercise by two or more
local governments of any power common to them;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT AGREED BY AND BETWEEN THE PARTIES AS
FOLLOWS:
Venture Established. Pursuant to the joint powers
authorization of Chapter 127 and of Chapter 134.31 of
the Illinois Revised Statutes, the undersigned hereby
federate together in a cooperative venture for the
joint and mutual operation of a 9-1-1 emergency
telephone system, to be known as Northwest Central 9-1-
1 System consisting of all local governments which may
hereafter become signatory.
2. Joint Emeraencv Telephone Svstem Board. There is
hereby established a Joint Emergency Telephone System
Board which shall consist of the Village Manager of
Arlington Heights, The Village Manager of Buffalo
Grove, the Village Manager of Elk Grove Village, the
Village Manager of Mount Prospect and the Director of
Northwest Central Dispatch System. Each subsequent
participating municipality in the Northwest Central 9-
1-1 System shall be entitled to one member on the Joint
Emergency Telephone System Board. Designation of the
new participating municipalities board member shall be
be specified by the participant's enabling ordinance.
3. By -Laws. Northwest Central 9-1-1 System shall be
subject to and shall be governed by certain By -Laws
which shall be adopted by the Joint Emergency Telephone
System Board together with any amendments which may be
made in the manner and means provided.
4.Particination. Each participating municipality in the
Northwest Central 9-1-1 System, and each municipality
which may hereafter become a participant is a member
and is entitled to the rights and privileges and is
subject to the obligations of membership, all as may be
provided in the By -Laws.
5. MerM_jnatioq. Any party to this Agreement may cease to
be a party hereto and may withdraw from participation
in the manner and means set forth in the By -Laws.
6. powers of the Board. The powers and duties of the
Emergency Telephone System Board created by this
Agreement shall include, but not be limited to the
following:
A. Planning a 9-1-1 emergency telephone system.
B. Coordinating and supervising the implementation,
upgrading, maintenance and operation of the system
including the establishment of equipment
specifications and coding systems.
C. Receiving monies from the surcharge imposed under
Section 15.3 of the Emergency Telephone System
Act, and from any other source, for deposit into
the Emergency Telephone System Fund.
D. Authorizing all disbursements from the fund.
E. Hiring, on a temporary basis, any staff necessary
for the implementation or upgrade of the system.
F. Making and entering into contracts.
G. Acquiring, holding and disposing of property.
H. Incurring debts, liabilities or obligations
necessary for the accomplishment of its purposes.
W
7. _Amendment. This Agreement may not be amended, except
by written agreement and resolution of all the then
current parties thereto.
8. Duration. This Agreement shall continue in effect
until rescinded by unanimous consent of the current
parties or until terminated in the manner provided in
the By -Laws.
9. Enforcement. Each member shall have the right to
enforce this Agreement against any other member. If
suit is necessary, a defaulting member shall pay
reasonable attorney's fees as adjudicated by the Court.
10. Authorization. Prior to execution of this Agreement,
each member shall deliver to the other a certified copy
of a suitable ordinance or resolution authorizing and
directing execution of this Agreement.
11. Effective Date. This Agreement shall become effective
when signed by all respective representatives of the
Village of Arlington Heights, the Village of Buffalo
Grove, the Village of Elk Grove Village and the Village
of Mount Prospect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned municipalities have set
their signatures on the dates set forth below. This
document may be signed in duplicate originals.
ATTEST:
DATE:
ATTEST
DATE:
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
BY
VILLAGE OF BUFFALO GROVE
BY
3
VILLAGE OF ELK GROVE
BY
ATTEST:
DATE:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BY
ATTEST:
DATE:
J
Village of twiaunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois's
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM °'`
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
1)
FROM: RON RICHARDSON, DEPUTY POLICE CHIEF
SUBJECT: ELK GROVE TAXI, INC. LICENSE APPLICATION
DATE: 07 DECEMBER 1988
Attached is the application of Elk Grove Taxi, Inc. for a village
of Mount Prospect corporate taxicab license. The application has
been completed correctly and the application fee has been paid.
The application now must be presented to the Village Board for
review and approval.
If the village Board approves this application Elk Grove Taxi,
Inc. then will be required to obtain a Village business license
as well as individual licenses for all taxicabs and cab drivers.
The police department will process all subsequent license
applications.
Elk Grove Taxi, Inc. has operated in the Village of Elk Grove for
18 months without significant problem or incident.
UYA
cc: Chief Ronald W. Pavlock
Deputy Chief T. Daley
Cindy Rominski
"OUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMEH-
_ ll2 E. Northwest highway
Mount Prospect, Prospect, ll. 00056
870-5V9b
ATTACHMENT C
TO BE USED FOR A CORPORATE APPLICATION
FOR A TAXICAB LICENSE
BUSINESS NAME ELK G ' --r
COMMON NAME (if different from above)
BUSINESS ADDRESS W.
CITY STATE _:IL._ZI US, PHONE6^
BUSINESS INFORMATION THAT MUST BE COMPLETED FOR THE CORPORATION APPLICATION
l. Has the applicant or any principal officer of the corporation held u previous
license from the Village of Mount Prospect for any business. [ ] Yes N No.
If yes, please indicate below the specific individual who held the license
and specify the type of license.
2. Has the applicant or any corporate officer had a license issuance or renewal
refused or revoked by any state, municiploity, governing body or licensing
authority. [ ] Yes X No. If yes please indicate on a seperate attachment
the reason for the refusal or revukation,
3. List any outstanding fees, fines, or other judgements that a corporate officer
or any stockholder of the corporation has with the Village of Mount Prospect.
4. List the current financial status of the corporation, including any judgements
and pertinent information relative to such Judgements.
5. List the experience that the corporation has in the transportation of passengers.
O. List the number of taxicabs that the corporation
within the Village of Mount Prospect:
7. List the address and phone number of any taxicab depot or terminal that will he
located in Mount Prospect:
(CONTINUE ON REVERSE SIDE)
\
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE n[PA0MF*T
112 E. Northwest Highway
Mount Prospect, %l. 60058
87O-Sh56
ATTACHMENT C-1
CORPORATE OFFICER/DIRECTOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR A TAXICAB BUSINESSLICENSE/EACH CORPORATE OFFICER MUST COMPLETE
NAME ]
B1
ADDRESS CITY ZIP
DATE OF Bl IAL SECURITY NUMBER
I. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? [ ] Yes [\/� No.
If yes, state the following on a seperate attachment: Date of conviction,
type of felony for which convicted and court location.
2. State your citizenship
3
. Have you ever been in military service? X Yes [ ] No.
If yes, state:
Branch of Service U A
Type of Discharge
4. List your residences for the past five (5) years.
AFFIRMATION
I DO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION HAS SEEN
FURNISHED BY ME AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS CORRECT. FURTHER, l AFFIRM
THAT ANY CHANGE IM THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE
IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION TO THE MOUNT PROSPECT CHIEF OF POLICE.
\l
'�
� �
^ 8
(THE EMPLOYMENT HISTORY ON THE REVERSE SIDE MUST BE COMPLETED)
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTN "'r
llZ E. Northwest Highway
— Mount Prospect, Il, 60056
87o-56sa
ATTACHMENT C-1
CORPORATE OFF ICER/DI RECTOR INFORMATION REQUIRED FOR 4 TAXICAB BUSINESS
LICENSE/EACH CORPORATE OFFICER MUST COMPLETE
ADDRESS 1031 o oft �L l l
DATE OF BIRTH SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER 331. .3(.- -07e. 2-
l. Have you ever been convicted of a felony? [ ] Yes [)Q No.
If yes, state the following on a seperate attachment: Date of conviction,
type of felony for which convicted and court location.
2. State your citizenship U.S.
3. Have you ever been in military service? [ ] Yes [.)Q No.
If yes, state:
Branch of Service
Type of Discharge
4. List your residences for the past five (S) years,
AFFIRMATION/
I D0 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION HAS BEEN
FURNISHED BY ME AND TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE IS CORRECT. FURTHER, l AFFIRM
THAT ANY CHANGE IN THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS APPLICATION WILL REQUIRE
IMMEDIATE NOTIFICATION TO THE MOUNT PROSPECT CHIEF OF POLICE.
(THE EMPLOYMENT HISTORY ON THE REVERSE SIDE MUST BE COMPLETED)
NAME AND ADDRESS LISTING OF CORPORATE SHAREHOLDERS
NAME RESIDENCE ADDRESS/CITY/STATE/ZIP
PERCENT OF STOCK OWNERSHIP
m
8604
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
MOUNT PROSPECT, IL. 60056
CASH RECEIPT (312) 392-6000
ono ss
INV. NO: DATE /_Z- 6
— ig—
ACCOUNT
NUMBER
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
01-4017
REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX
01-4110
BUSINESS LICENSES
01-4119
ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS
01-4120
FALSE ALARM FEES
01-4217
FINES - CIRCUIT COURT
01-4218
FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES
01-4231
SALE OF CODE BOOKS
01-4245
REIMBURSEMENT FOR VILLAGE PROPERTY
01-4247
POLICE AND FIRE REPORTS
01-4249
MISC. INCOME
---- ------ -
41-
WATER
74-
TRUST FUND/BONDS
d 0
TOTAL
BY SIWA IFFSTIEMS FORMS INC.. n3 -"w sim,4a
FINANCE
�
Village of of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Paul Bednar, Planning 6 Zoning Department
-T - V
SUBJECT: ZuA-69-SO-88
Gerald and Carl uuzoitokr
30 mnctb Main Street - Central Plaza Shopping Center
DATE: December 28, 1988
zbe applicants are requesting a special uoe in order to allow a
game room amusement arcade in the Central Plaza Shopping Center.
The applicants presented their case to the Zoning Board at their
regular December 15, 1988 hearing. They stated their intention
was to run a family oriented arcade bnaiueao at this location.
Staff stated their main concerns are: l) the compatibility of
this use with the other retail users in Central Plaza; and 2> the
standards for a special use permit.
Six nearby home oqoece were present to voice their objections to
this proposal. Some of the more frequently stated objections to
the game room were as follows:
Game rooms encourage vandalism and loitering.
2. The access in and out of the Central Plaza Shopping
Center is bad and will be worse when teenage drivers
are attracted to the center by the game room.
3. Many children and teenagers will travel to the game
comn on bicycles. This could create u safety problem
in an already dangerous parking lot.
Carl Kuzoitahy, the applicant, responded to the neighbors'
concerns. He agreed to mount surveillance cameras inside and
outside of the game room in order to monitor loitering and to
1A
He also suggested the following limitations on the boaioeon
which would alleviate potential problems:
l. There would be no food or beverages permitted on the
premises.
2. The hours of operation could be ahorteoed, if the Board
desired.
3. Bicycle parking racks would be provided on the
property, within vie~ from the surveillance cameras.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the merits and
disadvantages of a game room at this location. Several members
felt that providing this type of service in the community should
be encouraged. However, the majority of Board Members were more
concerned that this specific location invited problems. They
telt that the traffic flow in and out of the parking lot is bad
now and will be substantially worse when adding younger drivers.
They were also worried about the safety of children and
teenagers arriving by bicycle. Finally, they felt that the close
proximity of the single-family homes to the parking lot for this
business was a disadvantage. The CooioC Board of Appeals then
voted 2-5 to deny the request for a game room special one permit.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 69 -SU -88 Hearing Date: December 15, 1988
PETITIONER: Gerald and Carl Kuznitsky
PUBLICATION DATE: November 28, 1988
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 30 North Main Street
REQUEST: Special use to allow a game room
amusement arcade in the Central
Plaza Shopping Center located at the
corner of Central and Elmhurst
Roads.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Marilyn O'May
ILI
Harold Mielke, 18 N. Wille
James Poore, 9 N. Wille
William Rittenhouse, 5 N. Wille
Mr. Kurfman, 13 N. Wille
Doris Vogtritter, 100 N. Wille
Sonia Westerhof, 17 N. Wille
Dan Docel, 103 N. Wille
Chairman Basnik indicated that since this case has generated
substantial interest from the neighborhood, staff is asked to present
the case first.
Mr. Bednar noted that the applicant is requesting a game room in the
Central Plaza Shopping Center which requires a Special Use Permit.
Certain standards must be met as set forth in Section 14.704 of the
Zoning Code. Other departments have commented regarding this request.
The Police Department notes that the main parking lot, located to the
north of the property, is out of view and presents possible
surveillance problems. Loitering and other potential problems could
occur due to the location of the parking lot. Staff reviewed the
standards listed in the Code as follows:
1. The special use will serve the public convenience at the location
of the subject proerty; or that the establishment, maintenance or
operation of the special use will not be detrimental to or endanger
the public health, safety, morals, comfort or general welfare;
2. The location and size of the special use, the nature and intensity
of the operation involved in or conducted in connection with said
special use, the size of the subject property in relation to such
special use, and the location of the site with respect to streets
giving access to it, shall be such that it will be in harmony with the
appropriate, orderly development of the district in which it is
located;
3. That the special use will not be injurious to the use and
enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity of the subject
property for the purposes already permitted in such zoning district,
nor substantially diminish and impair other property valuations within
the neighborhood;
4. The nature, location and size of the buildings or structures
involved with the establishment of the special use will not impede,
substantially hinder, or discourage the development and use of
adjacent land and buildings in accord with the zoning district within
which they lie;
5. Adequate utilities, access roads, drainage and/or other necessary
facilities have been or will be provided;
6. Parking areas shall be of adequate size for the particular special
use, which areas shall be properly located and suitably screened from
adjoining residential uses, and the entrance and exit driveways to and
from these parking areas shall be designed so as to prevent traffic
hazards, eliminate nuisance and minimize traffic congestion in the
public streets; and
7. The special use sha-11 in all other respects conform to the
applicable regulations of the zoning district in which it is located,
except as such regulations may, in each instance, be modified as
provided in this Chapter (Chapter 14 Zoning Ordinance).
8. The location and site improvements proposed provide for adequate
safety for vehicles and pedestrians;
9. Provision has been made on the site for adequate open space and
landscaping.
Staff stated that these standards shall be used to judge the
applicants' request. Central Plaza serves as a neighborhood
commercial and convenience center. It should be determined if an
amusement establishment is a compatible use for this retail center,
and will it have an adverse effect on adjoining uses in Central
Plaza. The game room must serve the public convenience at this
location, and not be detrimental to the public health, safety and
welfare. The petitioner must explain the necessity for the use at
this location, and how it will be operated so as to be an asset to the
community. Information must be provided on management of the game
room. Hours of operation, number of employees and security measures
must be adequately discussed.
- 2 -
If the Board considers approving this special use, it is suggested
that the applicant be required to hire security personnel to patrol
the property, including the parking lot and parking lot improvements
should be made to the Central Plaza lot as a condition of approval.
Improvements may include landscape buffers along the perimeter,
resurfacing, restripping, and realignment of spaces.
Fred Kaplan, attorney for the two petitioners, introduced the
Kuznitsky's as father and son who want to operate the game room as a
family type business. The father was a Chicago police officer for 32
years and is well aware of security necessary. The son has been
working as a disc jockey and is familiar with teenage children. It is
not a gambling type operation and will be run as an amusement
business. It will be a clean, open type of operation that people will
not be afraid to bring their grandmothers to.
The Petitioner, Carl Kuznitsky, 1426 West Rosemont, Chicago, Illinois
stated that the game room will be a family -run operation and will be
completely family oriented. There will be no adverse affect on any
outlying areas. All local ordinances will be displayed and there will
not be any loud music, which seems to be a concern with everyone.
There will be no litter generated, because there will be no food or
beverages served on the premises. Surveillance cameras would be put
on the inside as well as the outside to watch for loitering or
vandalism that might take place. If necessary, there would be
security personnel patroling the game room and parking lot. There is
3200 square feet and the operation would begin with 50 games,
partitioned off for expansion later. Hours could be adjusted as
requested. A bicycle rack is proposed for congestion and convenience.
The game room would be available for birthday parties, fundraisers, or
charitable events. A percentage of profit would be donated to local
charities on certain fundraising event days.
Harold Mielke, 18 N. Wille, stated that a game room is a magnet school
for crime attracting gang leaders, drug peddlers and school children
who should be spending money for lunches. How many additional police
officers would be necessary to police this area (costing tax payers
money). There has already been several home invasions in the area and
Mr. Mielke objects to this petition on the above stated grounds.
James Poore, 9 N. Wille, indicated his objections due to accessibility
to area. It is a nightmare for adults to get in to the Central Plaza
parking lot and he cannot imagine what it would be like for teenagers
trying to get into the lot. He also objected to the bike rack due to
space allowances. The people who partake in this activity are less
than desirable and he does not really wish to have this type of
facility in the neighborhood.
Bill Rittenhouse, 5 N. Wille, does not think this type of activity
would be compatible with this neighborhood attracting people who do
not belong in the area and causing an adverse effect.
- 3 -
Doris Vogtritter, 100 Ni. Wille, strongly objects to this petition
citing various other game arcade problems and the parking problem. it
would not be condusive to the neighborhood. As a real estate
agent,potential buyers of neighborhood homes go through the shopping
center to see what is going on there and she would hope this is not
approved for that area.
Daniel Kurfman, 13 N. Wille, is not categorically opposed to game
rooms as a concept, but must look at it from the neighborhood
influence. This will be a hazard to bring in more pedestrians,
bicycles and cars into the area. It will have a negative influence on
the neighborhood and a negative effect on property values.
Sonia Westerhof, 17 N. Main, expressed concerns on traffic congestion,
possibilities for crime (has two small children at home), and the area
becoming a hang-out for teenagers. It will become a safety hazard
with bicycles competing with cars and will not have a positive effect
on the neighborhood. I
Chairman Basnik stated that a petition has been submitted objecting to
this proposal with 73 signatures. Letters of objection have been
received from Mr. and Mrs. Pearce, Mr. and Mrs. Sperling, Mr. and Mrs.
Zek and Ms. Rachael Dale.
The Petitioner, Carl Kuznitsky, stated that regardless of what
business goes into the area there would be additional traffic
congestion. At the game room in Palatine, there is no significant
increase in traffic congestion and no surveillance cameras are
necessary. At the game room in Chicago, cameras are mounted inside
and outside, allowing for little or no congestion inside or outside.
There have been no problems with gangs or drug dealings. If such were
to happen, it would all be on videotape incriminating those
individuals. The same type of operation is suggested for this game
room. If inadequate, more security personnel would be added. Video
cameras will be prominently displayed. Bicycle racks would probably
be placed in the parking lot in view of suveillance cameras.
Mr. Petrucelli questioned whether someone would be monitoring the
cameras during all hours of operation.
The Petitioner stated that was correct. At least two employees would
be inside and an additional security person would be added.
Chairman Basnik noted that the area is zoned B-3.
The Petitioner stated he was aware of the difficulties of other game
rooms in the area and indicated they were due to lack of security and
an apathetic attitude towards the game room. This game room will be
very well lit and expensively decorated. It will all be oriented to
the family.
Mr. Petrucelli questioned how this business would be "policed" such as
the Liquor Commission monitors businesses who have liquor licenses.
- 4 -
It was noted that there was no such commission for this type of
business. However, Mr. Bednar pointed out to the Board that licenses
are renewable every year for each machine. If problems did arise, the
Village could review the situation before issuing additional licenses.
The Petitioner stated that this business would be run the way a game
room should be run. No congestion, loitering or vandalism would be
tolerated and the police would be welcome to view tapes if concerned
about any events.
Mr. Petrucelli indicated that he was in favor of some place for
younger people to gather. Questions remain whether people running the
operation would be responsible and whether the location is correct for
the business.
Discussion ensued regarding the area and its B-3 zoning backing up to
a residential neighborhood. Any type of business placed in the area
will be generating more traffic for the area. Questions were raised
if this business meets all the special use standards. The parking lot
and access to it was discussed in depth.
Mr. Brettrager indicated that he was torn on the decision. He does
not see the noise and litter being a problem since the front faces
away from the residential area, however, he does see a traffic
problem.
Mr. Lannon stated that there is a lot to be said about giving kids a
place to go. He also noted that it is zoned B-3 and always has been.
The residents bought homes there knowing the shopping center existed
and businesses there generate traffic. Management is the key to the
impact on the area.
James Poore, 9 N. Wille, pointed out the impact of 30-40 more bicycles
in the parking lot.
Chairman Basnik reviewed the previously stated Special Use Standards
to see if this business meets with the requirements. It was the
consensus that it is detrimental to the public health, safety, morals,
comfort and general welfare; that it is in harmony with the
appropriate, orderly development of the district in which it is
located, that it is injurious to the use and enjoyment of other
property in the immediate vicinity of the subject; that it will not
impede or hinder adjacent land and buildings; that adequate utilities,
access roads, drainage and other facilities have been provided; that
it is not properly screened and entrance and exit driveways are not
designed to prevent traffic hazards, eliminate nuisance and minimize
traffic congestion in public streets; that it conforms to the
applicable regulations of the zoning district in which it is located;
that the location and site improvements proposed do not provide for
adequate safety for vehicles and pedestrians; and that the provision
has been made on the site for adequate open space and landscaping.
Ms. Brothers stated that she did not want to discourage this type of
business from Mount Prospect, however, another location should be
found to be more suitable.
- 5 -
Curt Vogtritter, 100 N. Wille, stated that the shopping area is
designed for quick in and quick out, and the game room is designed for
loitering.
Mr. Brettrager, seconded by Mr. Lannon, moved to grant a special use
to allow a game room amusement arcade in the Central Plaza Shopping
Center located at the corner of Central and Elmhurst Roads subject to
the following: that the applicant be required to hire security
personnel to patrol the property including the parking lot, and to
install security cameras on the exterior of ' the entrance to the
business as well as the north wall of the building to include the
parking lot to the north and to work with the Village to install
bicycle parking in a proper spot.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brettrager
Hayes: Petrucellif Brothers, Cassidy, O'May, Basnik
All naye votes were due to the fact that auto parking, bicycle
parking, traffic access points and sidewalks are not adequate to
provide suitable and safe conditions for access to this use.
By a vote of 5-2, the motion was denied.
This recommendation will be forwarded to'the Village Board for their
consideration.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
Village of`~_Acunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Dixon. Village Manager
FROM: Paul Bednar, Planning & Zoning Depurtmeo�-
8U8JECT: %B& -70-V-88
Judith and Thomas Amberg, 1400 Cleven Avenue
DATE: December 27' 1988
13
Mr. Amberg. the Petitioner' is requesting a variation to Section
14.102.B in order to allow a 4' separation between an detached
garage and the principal structure instead of the lO' required by
code,
Mr. Amberg presented his case before the Zoning Board of Appeals
at their regular December 15' 1908 hearing. He stated that be
would like to construct a room addition off the rear of his
existing brick home in order to have his elderly mother move in.
The location of the addition is such that at one point it will be
only 4' from the existing detached brick garage. Mr, Amberg
noted that the new addition will be brick just like the existing
home and detached garage and he does agree to install thicker dry
wall and smoke detectors as recommended by the Village Fire
Department.
Staff pointed out that the 10' separation between garages and
principal structures is mainly a fire safety provision. However,
the Fire Department does not have an objection to this case if
certain conditions are met.
The Zoning Board of Appeals voted unanimously 6-0 to approve the
proposal. There were no neighbors or objectors present to
comment on this case.
pBzl
lavA W Uk�
Approved
SI 9,40AW so*
CZ Z -VZ -Al
sc aae
J,. L INI Sj,'
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 70-V-88 Hearing Date: December 15, 1988
PETITIONER: Judith and Thomas Amberg
PUBLICATION DATE: November 28, 1988
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1400 Cleven Avenue
REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.102.B to
allow a minimum separation of 4 feet
between the principal structure and
the detached garage to allow a room
addition.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli (Arrived 8:10 p.m)
Marilyn O'May
Robert Brettrager
None
The Petitioner, Thomas Amberg, 1400 Cleven, stated that in order to
have his ill, elderly mother move in with his family instead of
putting her in a retirement home, he would like to build an addition
on his home. There is a corner of the addition that would be 4 feet
from the existing garage. The remainder of the addition would be at
least 6 feet away. The Petitioner agrees to drywall according to
staff requests and to put in smoke alarms inter -connected throughout
the house. The new addition will be brick, just like the existing
home and detached garage.
Staff cited that a 10 foot separation between existing garages and new
room additions is a fire safety provision, however, the Fire
Department would approve this variation if the thicker drywall is
installed and smoke detectors were hooked into the house system. The
lot coverage was noted to be 37%.
Mr. Basnik questioned approval of this addition if there were no
hardship since Code states that it is unsafe and now it will be
allowed through variation.
Ms. Brothers stated that both structures are brick and it is only at
one point and not in a continuous line.
Upon motion by Mr. Cassidy, and seconded by Ms. Brothers, it was moved
to grant the variation in ZBA 70-V-88 to allow a minimum separation of
4 feet between the principal structure and the detached garage as
shown on Petitioner's Exhibit #1, subject to the Petitioner complying
with all requests of Village staff as far as safety and location of
the structure are concerned.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Lannon, Brothers, Qassidy, O'May, Basnik
Nayes: None
Mr. Petrucelli declined to vote on this variation due to arrival in
the middle of testimony.
By a vote of 6-0, the motion carried.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their
cosideration.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
- 2 -
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-70-V-88, JUDITH AND THOMAS AMBERG
LOCATION: 1400 CLEVEN AVENUE
DATE: DECEMBER 6, 1988
REQUEST
The applicants are requesting a variation from Section 14.102.8.
to allow a minimum separation of 4 feet between a room addition on
principal structure and the detached garage. This variation is
necessary in order to allow a room addition.
mif-A"AWWWWWri
The Engineering Department notes that the existing drainage pattern
must not be altered by the construction of the room addition. The
Inspection Services Department notes that the interior garage wall
must be reinforced with 5/811 Class "XII drywall since it will be so
close to the new room addition. They also recommend that smoke
detectors in the addition and the existing house be inter -connected
so that when one detector sounds, all detectors will sound. No
other comments or objections were received regarding this case.
This home is located on a larger than standard size lot (9,200
square feet) at the corner of Cleven Avenue and Bobby Lane. The
applicants are requesting a variation to the required 10 foot
separation between the proposed room addition and the detached
garage. The purpose of the addition is to provide living space for
the applicant's aging mother.
The main concern we have is one of hardship. The petitioner should
establish the hardship for this variation. It is feasible for this
room addition to be shifted further west, as close as 8 feet away
from the west property line and still meet the side yard setback
requirements. ' If this were to occur, no variation would be
necessary for separation between garage and addition. However,
Gil Basnik - Page
December 6, 1988
because of the existing building lines along the west property
line, it may be more aesthetically pleasing to the most affected
neighbor to the west, to keep the addition in line with the
existing home (as proposed).
The major reason for the code requirement of a 10 foot separation
is for fire safety. Neither the Fire Department nor the Inspection
Services Departments have an objection to this request, if approval
is conditioned upon the requirement of the installation of rated
drywall in the garage. Planning and Zoning concurs with this
opinion. No adverse impact upon the neighborhood is expected as
a result of this variation.
In summary, the applicant must establish a hardship. The Village
has no objection to the proposal from a fire safety standpoint if
the above mentioned conditions are made part of the approval.
PB:hg
THomAs T SuRKE
WuAjAm E RYAN
HARRY A. SPRINGER
TIMOTHY d. RYAN
ARTHuFt N. CHRISTIE
Lkw OFFICES
BURKE AND RYAN
33 NORTH DEAPSORN STREET
SurTE 402
CHIC --.GO, ILUNOIG 60602
December 7, 1988
Mr. John Dixon
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Re: 1 - 5 South Pine
Dear Mr. Dixon:
Enclosed are ordinances authorizing the condemnation of the
referenced property and authorizing execution of the sale
contracts therefore. Please have these presented at the next
Village Board Meeting and send me executed contracts and a
certified copy of each ordinance. If there are any questions,
please call.
Very truly yours,
y A.
BAS:-Jad
enclosures
236.1366
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF
PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE
FOR PUBLIC PARKING
ADOPTED BY THE PRESIDENT AND
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THIS DAY OF , 1988
Published in pamphlet form
by authority of the President
and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect, Cook
County, Illinois, this
day of , 1988.
G
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ACQUISITION OF
PROPERTY THROUGH CONDEMNATION OR OTHERWISE
FOR PUBLIC PARKING
WHEREAS, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect have determined that the real property legally described
in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof and its
acquisition are necessary, required and needed by the Village for
the public purpose of public parking and are in the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is empowered,
pursuant to its home rule powers, to acquire by purchase,
donation, lease or eminent domain real property to achieve the
aforesaid public purpose of public parking; and
WHEREAS, the exercise of its powers of eminent domain
required in order to condemn or` purchase for said public purpose
of public parking is contained in both the Illinois Revised
Statutes and the home rule ordinances of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the acquisition of property for said public purpose
of public parking requires the exercise of powers and performance
of functions pertaining to the government and affairs of the
Village.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS,
IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, as follows:
SECTION 1: That under the authority vested in the
corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect through
the statutes of the State of Illinois and the home rule powers
and ordinances of the Village, it is hereby determined that it is
necessary and desirable that the Village shall acquire title to
and possession of the real property legally described in Exhibit
A which is attached hereto and made a part hereof and hereinafter
referred to as the "Subject Property", which property is
necessary, required and needed to achieve the foregoing public
purpose of public parking, and which property lies wholly within
the limits of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION 2: That the law firm of Burke and Ryan be and it
is hereby authorized, empowered and directed to negotiate
personally or through its representatives for and on behalf of
said Village with the owner or owners of the Subject Property for
the purchase thereof by said Village.
SECTION 3: That in the event that said law firm or its
agents is unable to agree with the owners of the Subject Property
as to the compensation to be paid therefor, then fee simple title
and possession of the Subject Property shall be acquired by the
Village of Mount Prospect through condemnation and the law firm
of Burke and Ryan, as attorneys for the Village, is hereby
authorized, empowered and directed to institute proceedings in
any court of competent jurisdiction to acquire fee simple title
to and possession of said Subject Property for said village in
accordance with the eminent domain laws of the State of Illinois
and the ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION 4: That this ordinance shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication
in pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1988.
Village President
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
I
The North 22 feet of Lot 17, together with all of Lots 18 and 19
in Block 2 in Busse and Wille's Resubdivision in mount Prospect
in the West 1/2 of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11 East
of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois.
(commonly known as 1 and 5 South Pine Street, Mount Prospect,
Illinois)
08-12-101-001
08-12-101-015
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
ADOPTED BY THE
PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THIS DAY OF f 1988.
Published in pamphlet form
by authority of the President
and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect, Cook
County, Illinois, this
day of _ f 1988.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING
THE EXECUTION OF A REAL ESTATE PURCHASE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect Board of Trustees has
determined that, pursuant to its home rule and statutory powers
relative to the public purpose of providing public parking, it is
in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect that the
Village enter into a certain Real Estate Purchase Agreement, a
copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as
Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
IN THE EXERCISE OF ITS HOME RULE POWERS, as follows:
SECTION 1: The village President and Village Clerk are
hereby authorized to execute the Real Estate Purchase Agreement
which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, the Board having
determined that the Agreement is, pursuant to its home rule and
statutory powers relative to the public purpose of providing
public parking, in the best interests of the village of Mount
Prospect.
SECTION is The acts of the President, Trustees, village
Clerk, officers, attorneys and employees of the Village necessary
to implement, carry out, or give effect to the terms of the Real
Estate Purchase Agreement which are attached hereto as Exhibit A
are hereby authorized.
SECTION 3: This Ordinance and each of its terms shall be
the effective legislative act of a home rule municipality without
regard to whether such Ordinance should (a) contain terms
contrary to the provisions of current or subsequent non-
preemptive state law, (b) legislate in a manner or regarding a
matter not delegated to municipalities by state law. It is the
intent of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount
Prospect that, to the extent the terms of this Ordinance are
inconsistent with any non -preemptive state law, said terms shall
supersede said state law to the extent of said inconsistency.
SECTION 4: This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by
law, but shall be subsequently published in pamphlet form.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1988.
VILLAGE PRESIDENT
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect ,
Mountect � Illinois
P
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: KAREN GUTHRIE GIET, CABLE TELEVISION ADMINIST L.t�
DATE: DECEMBER 5, 1988
RE: PURCHASE OF TELEVISION EQUIPMENT
The Division scheduled the purchase of an expanded GEL unit in the
current budget year. The GEL unit that the Division currently owns was
purchased with the understanding that the equipment would be expanded to
provide the full effects needed for enhanced production capabilities.
The ability to expand was the reason the CEL was purchased. The
Division has now completed the bid process for the CEL Dual Channel EFX
IV,
The Division placed bids twice for this equipment and installation. The
Division received no bids for the September 26, 1988 notice. Bid
invitations were sent to six companies. For the second bid, invitations
were sent to three companies. Roscor Corporation responded. Notices of
the bid were published in the Herald.
Attached is the bid from Roscor Corporation for the CEL MS -304 Maurice
Minor EFX IV for the amount of $21,500. After the bid was opened,
further negotiation by the Cable Television Administrator with Roscor,
reduced the bid to $19,995,
The Cable Television Administrator recommends accepting the bid for the
CEL MS -304 Maurice Minor EFX IV from Roscor Corporation in Mount
Prospect. Funds for this piece of equipment were budgeted under line
item 1-022-01-8005.
There is no anticipated major equipment purchase in the 1989-1990
budget.
KGG:er
Attachments
c: Village Clerk
PROPOSAL
Company Villacip of Mount Prospect Page 1 of 5
Attention Mq - T, i r Pry Gu hr i e G ie t Prepared by Jon C. Ulfsrud
Proposal Title CEL N;),Qra(J- r304494P1 Date 11/07/88
Item Oty,
Description
Unit Price
Amount
1
CEL MS -101 to MS -304 Maurice System
Upgrade for Upgrade of MS -101 Maurice
Miner to MS -304 Maurice EFX IV
Package Price Including Installation
$21,500.00
TERMS OF SALE ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PAGE.
Roscor Corporation 1061 Feehanville Drive Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 (312) 539-7700 TWX'. 910 223-1218
SNIMN�
Village of Mount Prospect [304494P] 2 of 5
Company Page -
Item
oty.
Description
Unit Price
Amount
INSTALLATION
Including:
I. Project meeting:
When an order of this magnitude is
awarded to Roscor, it is
designated as a project. At this
time, a project manager and a
project engineer are assigned to
the job and stay with it until its
completion. The responsibility of
the project manager is to prepare
a critical path for the project
and to keep the project on
schedule. He expedites the
delivery of all the equipment and
other hardware for the project and
organizes the manpower to complete
the installation on time.
The project engineer is
responsible for the technical
integrity of the system. He will
work closely with your staff
throughout the design phase of the
project to document exactly what
the customer wants. Then he
oversees the installation to make
sure the system is built as
designed.
Project meetings will be held on a
regular basis between the time an
order is placed and when it is
delivered. Attending the
meetings will be the project
manager, the project engineer and
any appropriate customer
contacts.
TERMS OF SALE ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PAGE.
Roscor Corporation 1061 Feehanville Drive Mount Prospect. Illinois 60056 (312) 5397700 TWX: 910 223-1218
1@ �6-
Company
Village of Mount Prospect [304494P]
Page
3 of 5
Item
Qty. Description
Unit Price
Amount
At these meetings, every phase of
the installation will be discussed
from the system design to equipment
availability. Notes are generated
by the project manager and all
participants receive copies so
everyone is up to date and
understands exactly where the
project is going. Project Meetings
will be held as often as necessary
to be sure both Roscor and you are
comfortable with the understanding
of the scope of the project.
11. Complete Documentation of every
phase of the installation as
outlined in the project meetings,
including, but not limited to:
*Video Flow
*Audio Flow
*Router Control Linos
*Editor Control
*Intercom Flow
*Tally Flow
*Equipment Rack Layout
*Floor Plans, including ergonomic
drawings to determine line of site
and equipment reach requirements
*Console Design and Conceptuals
*Custom Panels
*Heating and Electrical Requirements
The only way anything gets done in
the installation and fabrication
departments is from a drawing.
There is absolutely no
blacksmithing of any kind. From a
simple connector panel to an
extensive equipment
modification,there are drawings
generated to document exact
dimensions, signal flow and parts
lists for future reference.
TERMS OF SALE ON REVEPSE SIDE OF THIS PAGE
Roscor Corporation 1061 Fpehanville Dive Mount PtospecC Minas 60056 (312) 539-7700 TWX 910 223-1218
Company Village of Mount Prospect [304494P] Page
4 of 5
Item
Qty.
Description
Unit Price
Amount
III. Staging:
Prior to shipment, the system will
be staged and wired in the Roscor
fabrication area. individual
components and system quality
control will be done at this time.
Any customer representatives are
invited to visit Roscor at any time
and inspect the progress of their
system. In addition, your
representatives are also invited to
inspect the system at Roscor prior
to breakdown and shipment.
IV. Physical Installation to include:
*Interconnection to all components
in the individual systems per the
drawings generated from the project
meetings.
*All cables will be neatly laced
and dressed within the individual
equipment racks or consoles
*All cables will be labled at both
ends and cable numbers will
correspond to all notes and numbers
on the "as built -drawings.
V. Training:
This is system training, not
operational training. At this
time, the project engineer will
orient your staff to the system
flow, drawing by drawing. Every
aspect of the system from patch
panels to distribution amplifiers
will be discussed and explained to
your total satisfaction.
TERMS OF SALE ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PAGE.
Roscor Corporation 1061 Feehanville Drive Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 (312) 539-7700 TWX. 910 223-'218
Company Village of Mount Prospect E304494P] Page 5 of 5
Item
Qty. Description
Unit Price
Amount
Freight and Insurance from the point
of origin to destination will be
prepaid and added.
I have read the Terms and Conditions on
the reverse side of this proposal.
Accepted for
by
Name
Title
Accepted for Roscor
by
Name
Title
TERMS OF SALE ON REVERSE SIDE OF THIS PAGE.
Roscor Corporation 1061 Fee*ianville Drive Mount Prospect. 11inois 60056 (312) 539.7700 TWK 910 223-1218
MAYOR
�
m��
-
-
���-���
�D FLOROS
NORMA J. MURAUSKIS
=��!����.
Village of
Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 6005e
Phone 3,e/oee-6000
October 18,
1988
Mr. Jon Ulfsrud
Roscor Corporation
I061 Feehanville Drive
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60050
Dear Jon:
The Village of Mount Prospect invites you to bid for a contractual
arrangement for supplying television production equipment as described
in the attached specifications and general conditions.
All bids must be submitted before lO:OO a.m. on Monday, November 7, I988
in an envelope marked:
SEALED BID
TELEVISION PRODUCTION EQUIPMENT
DO NOT OPEN!
The bids will be opened at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, November 7, 1988 at the
Mount Prospect Village Hall in the Trustee's Room on the second fluor.
Youlklare invited to attend the opening.
s or
KGG:er
Attachments
I. BID NOTICE
II, SPECIAL CONDITIONS I
III. SPECIFICATIONS 3
IV. BID SHEET
7
V. WARRANTY INFORMATION 9
CAROLYN H. KRAUSE
RALPH W. ARTHUR
GERALD L FARLEY
LEO FLOPOS
NORMA J. MURAUSIGS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE J. WATTENSEAG
Village of Mount
Prospect
VLLA" MAKAGO
JOHN FULTON OIXON
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 312 392-6000
I. BID NOTICE
II, SPECIAL CONDITIONS I
III. SPECIFICATIONS 3
IV. BID SHEET
7
V. WARRANTY INFORMATION 9
Notice is hereby given that sealed bids will be received by the Village of
Mount Prospect, Illinois, until 10:00 A.M. on November 7, 1988 for Television
Production Equipment Maurice Dual Channel Zoom System Mix Effects (EF% IV)
<CEL); to upgrade the Village's GEL Model P14730.
All bids will be publicly opened at the above -stated time, and bidders and/or
their agents are invited to be present.
The Village Board reserves the right to accept or reject any or all proposals
and to make the award in the best interest of the Village.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS
A. The bid price shall include a manufacturer's minimum warranty on all
components. All defective parts and labor to install same to be supplied
by the vendor without charge to the Village. Bidder to state warranty on
all components.
B. Any deviations from the Specifications and Special Conditions shall be
noted on a separate paper and signed by the bidder.
C. Submit complete specifications, illustrative and descriptive literature on
unit being proposed. Upon bid award, bidder shall provide one (1)
operator's manual, wiring diagram on unit being sold Cif available),
and a system schematic for all book -ups into the current studio production
equipment, and all documentation.
D. The units being bid shall be of the manufacturer's current model and
latest design. Further, the unit shall be properly serviced and be ready
for immediate operation. No prototype units which may be available will be
accepted.
E. All bids to remain in a firm price for a period of 80 days after
bid opening date.
F. Indicate -delivery date of unit after formal notice of award.
G. Bidders are instructed to itemize and price all optional accessories
available on the unit being bid which are not included in
the Specifications. The Village reserves the right to include any or all
of those items listed at the unit costs set forth,
1
H. All bidders are requested to itemize all added cost accessory items,
procedures, or methods which are not outlined herein but which may, if
added to the unit, improve its performance, reduce operator fatigue,
improve safety or improve the quality and life span of the component
parts. The bidder is instructed to not list those items which are
considered standard by the manufacturer or those items which are
otherwise specified herein. All items listed must be compatible with
the machine being bid, and unit costs must reflect all allowances for
installation and/or depletion of the original equipment being bid in
accordance with the Specifications. Do not include in base bid of basic
machine the optional items in Paragraph G. List items, methods, and or
procedures described above separately and define function, operations or
mayor innovation of each along with the unit cost. The Village of Mount
Prospect reserves the right to incorporate any of these items into the
construction of the basic machine at an added cost, not to exceed the unit
costs as set forth by the bidder.
I, Once the installation is complete, two (2) Village employees will receive
a minimum of two (2) days training of the proper use of the equipment.
J. The Village of Mount Prospect will pay no freight or express charges. All
bid quotes are F.O.B. Village of Mount Prospect.
K. Illinois Retailers occupational taxes are not applicable to purchases for
governmental functions.
L. All equipment proposed for bid should be available for installation
within thirty (30) days of notification by the Village to the successful
bidder.
M. Installatiog should be completed thirty (30) days after receipt of
equipment in the Village of Mount Prospect. Total time for delivery and
installation shall not exceed sixty (60) days.
eA
SPECIF ICATIOIS
LRVISTCI
GEIERAL PROVISIONS AID REQUIREMENTS
Equipment to be furnished!
CEL - Maurice Dual Channel Zoom System Mix Effects (EFX IV)
(To upgrade existing GEL Model P14730)
General: It is the intent of the Village of ?count Prospect that the
television equipment to be furnished under this proposal shall be of the
manufacturer's latest model and design. It must not be prototype or
experimental. A detailed list of components required is included and is the
basis on which the supplier's proposal must be made.
in cases where an item is identified by manufacturer's name, it is
understood that the bidder proposes to furnish the item so identified
and does not propose to furnish an "equal" unless the proposed "equal" is
definitely indicated therein by the bidder. Any additions, deletions, or
variations from the following specifications must be noted clearly on the
face of the proposal exactly as to what these deletions or variations are.
Any item appearing in the bidder's regular published specifications are
assumed to be included in the bidder's proposal. The reference above to the
trade name is intended to be descriptive, but not restrictive, and only to
indicate to the respective bidders a unit that will be satisfactory. The
Village hereby reserves the right to approve as an equal or reject as not
being an equal any unit the bidder proposes to furnish which contains
major variations or deletions from these specifications, but which may
comply substantially therewith.
MaterialA and Workmanghi2: All equipment, materials and workmanship
shall be of the highest grade in accordance with modern practice. The
equipment supplied will be new and unused except for the necessary
testing, calibration and transportation.
3. Warranty: All items furnished in accordance with these specifications
shall be covered by the manufacturer's and/or supplier's standard warranty
or guarantee on new equipment and associated parts and labor charges.
4. Tzx;e-iPn,-e: The equipment to be furnished shall be the product
of a qualified firm that is regularly engaged in the manufacture and
supply of this equipment. A qualified firm shall be defined to mean one
which has manufactured and sold twenty of the specified units during the
past two years. A list of the twenty users will be. supplied.
Tarts and Seriy,e* To best service the requirements of'the Village,
it is the intent of these specifications to secure equipment, which can be
properly maintained and serviced without the necessity of stocking an
expensive parts inventory or being subjected to long periods of
interrupted service due to lack of spare parts, The successful bidder
must be an authorized service center for all major components of the
system.
All bidders submitting bids must have available at least two factory parts
and one service center. This center shall be staffed with full time
te:;hnical, as well as order and shipping personnel during regular business
hours and days. These factory centers must have toll free telephone
service and be convenient to air freight, bus or overnight parcel service.
When required, the supplier shall list his nearest factory part and service
location, plus any other pertinent information requested.
5.R,',ectronic IZQui2m4-nt Loaner Poli!�,)t: The bidder shall maintain loaner
electronic equipment at his service center. The buyer can request that a.
loaner unit be made available while his equipment is being returned for
repair. The bidder shall indicate whether a rental charge is made for this.
equipmentand service, both during and after warranty.
Ex-aptions: Major exceptions to the component list and
specification requirements, or failure to submit requested information will
be considered sufficient cause for refection of a proposal.
'nformation to b4- furaished by bidder: Each bidder shall furnish
the following information with his proposal. Please check each item to
indicate compliance: J
A. Detailed component list
B. Complete integrated schematic upon
bid awardI ------
C. Literature describing all major
equipment -------------
D. The supplier information sheet
4
Compliance to the specifications shall
be answered by a yes or no and deviations
shall be clearly indicated on an attached
sheet and referenced by component to aid
in proper evaluation.
State time in calendar days, from receipt __! w."l p Oay"
of order to delivery date.
1"emcgstratinn of the c„anm n : The Village has the right to have
each bidder demonstrate the exact equipment he will supply within one (1)
week after notification. Failure to demonstrate exact equipment will be
cause for disqualification of the proposal.
10� ;;-"itAjj„A_tian_ System is to be installed and timed by a qualified
television engineer familiar with on -air application as well as
cable television transmission. Successful bidder, upon notification from
the Village, shall, upon request of the Village, contact
TCI of Illinois (Mount Prospect) I -YET Engineering staff to arrange for
coordination of installation to subscriber and I -BET systems.
11. performance: Total cost will reflect all costs of
actions and equipment necessary to fabricate, install, time, and make
the system operational. Bidder should contact the Village of Mount
Prospect for an inspection of the premises.
12. Additional Costs: This proposal shall be sufficient to cover all cables,
hardware, component pieces, and interfaces to integrate all existing and
proposed equipment with each other and with the cable system present in
the Television Production Center. Any items not specified in the bidder's
response to the proposal, yet necessary for and to the operation of the
total system shall be supplied at the expense of the successful bidder.
It shall be the responsibility of the bidder to view the premises and
unit(s) in which the equipment may be housed. Costs for additional
carpentry or housing should be stated as a part of the bid cost. Costs
incurred due to failure to integrate the bid equipment into current
equipment or costs incurred due to failure of bidder to include additional
racks or cabinetry, if necessary, shall be borne by bidder.
13. The Village intends to purchase the itemized equipment as a total package
to ensure the best price available. Should the Village decide to accept a
portion of a proposal, all prices quoted would remain valid.
DEVIATIONS
Bidder must itemize all deviations to the specifications here. If this is not
sufficient space, attach additional sheets as required.
Unless otherwise stated by the bidder in the space provided above, the proposal
will be considered as being in strict accordance with the specifications
outlined herein, even though the manufacturer's literature indicated deviations
from the Village's specifications.
The undersigned dealer herewith submits a bid on the following Television
Production Equipment in accordance with attached Specifications. Bids due in
the Village ?tanager's Office prior to 10:00 a.m., November 7, 1988. The dealer
agrees to comply with all the requirement as stipulated in said Specifications.
Quantity DP='i;ZtjoMilinm-'rit List Unit Total
Maurice Dual Channel Zoom SF.F: ATTAC HM PRQPC)SAT
System -Mix Effects (EFX IV)
BID SHEET
Deduct $-------------------------from the unit bid price for purchase of
package.
Payment Terms: Upon receipt of equipment at the Village of Mount Prospect,
twenty-five percent (25%) of net shall be payable. Balance is to be paid in full
30 days after all equipment is installed and operational.
E -----------------------is Village cost, less all Federal and State taxes
from which the Village is exempt. Delivered F.O.B. Mount Prospect, Illinois.
Dealer to make delivery within._----_ days.
'• ••• •••;•• •
WON. Wrl FTNA 0 0 -4 11 L4
Mr PROSPECT IL 60056
312 539-7700
Phone: --------------
Signature:-lyptC -4 ad-, -A- ---------
Title:__11T0=Y_P ------------
Date Submitted: ----- N9JEMM 2 -------------- 1988
8
WARRANTY
All parts and components of the Television Production Equipment shall be
warrantied against defective materials and workmanship for a period of twelve
months, following delivery of the equipment to the purchasers. Items excluded
from this warranty shall be expendable parts such as light bulbs, fuses,
connectors, etc.
All warranty applications shall be deemed to be F.O.B. vendor's nearest service
center, the shipping address and telephone number to be provided in this
proposal.
Warranty service by vendor shall be vendor's option to repair or replace any
warranty defective part or component by repairing such in vendor's service
center after shipment by purchaser a replacement component or part and charge
to purchaser only shipping cost for such. Unless within the first 90 days the
piece of equipment fails to perform as specified or represented by the Vendor
or Manufacturer in which case a full refund may be requested by and paid to the
Village of Mount Prospect.
No warranty shall be applicable to malfunctions due to damage, neglect, normal
wear, misuse, loss or improper repairs to, any part of the equipment. Improper
repairs are deemed to be repairs made by other than vendor authorized
personnel, or repairs not made in accordance with and covered by manufacturer's
or vendor's service manuals, or repairs utilizing parts or materials not
furnished by the namufacturer or vendor. The vendor reserves the right of final
Judgement of warranty applications.
THE FOLLOWING WARRANTY IS MANUFACTURER'S SOLE VARRANTY, AND ALL OTHER
WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY, INCLUDING ANY IXPLIED VARRANTY OR
MERCHANTABILITY OR.FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE NEGATED AND EXCLUDED.
THE FOREGOING WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER VARRANTIES, GUARANTEES,
REPRESENTATIONS, OBLIGATIONS OR LIABILITIES ON THE PART OF THE MANUFACTURER.
Purchaser's sole remedy and manufacturer's sole obligation for alleged product
failure, whether under warranty claim or otherwise, shall be the aforestated
obligation of manufacturer to repair or replace products returned within
warranty period. All obligation of manufacturer shall terminate twelve months
after date of original shipment. The manufacturer shall be liable for, and the
purchaser assumes and agrees to idemnify and save harmless the manufacturer in
respect to any loss or damage that may arise through the use by the purchaser
or others, or any of the manufacturer's product.
ase list all in=
wr submitted -c - ,
t where not .-.
Maurice D=—
Zoom Sys
(EFX IV)._
1W
November 7, 1988
Ms. Karen Guthrie Giet
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60656
Dear Ms. Giet:
Please find enclosed Proposal Number 304494P.
If you have any questions regarding the proposal
enclosed, please do not hesitate to call me.
"Cordially,
n C. U
oU fsrud
srud
0
Sales Re resentative
jU/rmh
Enclosure: Proposal Number 304494P
I I
Roscor Corporation 1061 Feehanvills Drive Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 (312) $39-7700 FAX: (312) 299-4206
VILLAGE BG.<RD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IM ,'OVEMENTS
AND/OR
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL
PROJECT: Sanitary Sewer Extension
LOCATION: 805 S. Ed ewood Lane
ENGINEER Peter F. Olesen & Associates
DATE: December 15, 1988
YES NO
ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED: 2.P. ENGINEER
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK
AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED Q.7�7 ENGINEER
ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANT-
ING APPROVED PLANNING/ZONING
PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL - PUBLIC WKS,DIRECTOR
INSPECTION SERVICE APPROVAL D INSPECTION SERVICE
DIRECTOR
PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE
WATER MAIN -0-
FT.
SIZE
SANITARY SEWER 194
FT. 8'
SIZE
STORM SEWER -0-
FT.
SIZE
ROADWAYS -0-
-0-
MILES
SIDEWALKS -0-
SQ.FT.
SQ. YDS.
STREET REGULATORY SIGNS -0-
-0-
STREET LIGHTS -0-
NO.
PARKWAY TREES -0-
NO.
PARKWAY LANDSCAPING
Cash Escrow fof
$989 for sod restoration
RETENTION/DETENTION
AREAS -0-
PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED
WATER MAIN
-0-
FT. SIZE
SANITARY SEWER
-0-
FT. SIZE
STORM SEWER
-0-
FT. SIZE
ROADWAY
-0-
MILES
PARKING LOTS
-0-
SQ. YDS.
LANDSCAPING
-0-
RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS -0-
APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 1988
Village of of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
From: Michael Sims, Planner
Date; November 28. 1988
Subject: Old Orchard Country Club Village Rival Plat of
Subdivision.
West aide of Schoenbeck Road, between Rand and Camp
McDonald Roads.
The subject site currently consists of 28.63 acre golf course
which the applicant, Lexington Development Corporation, proposes
to use in developing uyz "Arbor Home" commuoity. The applicant
was granted an amendment to the previous Consent Decree in order
to develop this area.
The Plan Commission heard this item during their regular meeting
on May 4. 1988 and voted 6-1 in favor or recommending approval of
the plat. The one negative vote was from Frank Boege who stated
be felt the site should have two vehicular access points. The
question of road right-of-way width for Schoenbeck Road needed to
be worked out with Cook County before the plat could he presented
to the Village Board. This was recently resolved.
Staff has no objections to the plat.
�"�
MAYOR
CAF40LYN H KRAUSE
TI"TM
RALPH IN ARTHUR
GERALD L FARLE
LEO FLOPOS
NORMA J, MURAUSKIS
GEORGE) VAN GEEM
THEODORE J WATTENSERG Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 312 / 392-6000
A G E N D A
MOUNT PROSPECT PIAN COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
January 4, 1989
Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
8:00 P.M.
I.
CALL TO ORDER
11.
ROLL CALL
Ill.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF DECEMBER 21, 1988 MEETING
IV.
SUBDIVISIONS
A. REESE RESUBDIVISION, 1217 WILDWOOD DRIVE
V.
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development Committee—Mr.
Richardson
B. Comprehensive Plan Committee ...... Mr.
McGovern
C. Development Code Committee ........ Mr.
Kloster
D. Text Amendment Committee .......... Mr.
Velasco
Vi.
OLD BUSINESS
Vii.
NEW BUSINESS
VIII.
QUESTIONS AND COMMENTS
IX.
ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES of the REGULAR MEETING of the
MOUNT PROSPECT PLAN COMMISSION
DECEMBER 21, 1988
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was
called to order by Chairman Donald Weibel at 8:00 P.M. at the
Village Hall, 100 South Emerson St., Mount Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL
Present upon Roll Call: Frank Boege
Frank Breitsameter
Lynn Kloster
Tom 'McGovern
William Navigato
Errol Richardson
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Absent; Tom Borrelli
Village Staff Present: Michael Sims, Staff Planner
Press Staff Present: David Small, Mt. Prospect Journal
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Velascols motion to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
of December 7, 1988 was seconded by Mr. Richardson. All members
voted Aye and Chairman Weibel declared the minutes approved.
SUBDIVISIONS
None
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community
Development: No report other than what will be covered
in the discussion on the Block Grant Program.
B. Comprehensive
Plan: No report
C. Development
Code: No report
D. Text Amendment: No report
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 2
DECEMBER 21, 1988
OLD BUSINESS
Community Development Block Grant Program
Mr. Sims presented a summary of block grant proposals received
to date for the Commission's information and invited questions/
comments they might have. The estimated costs of the eligible
proposals received totaled $394,500 which did not include
administrative costs. Mr. Sims said it is expected that Mount
Prospect will receive about $254,000 in block grant funds which
would mean that about $170,000 would have to be taken out of
current proposed projects.
Mr. Velasco questioned whether the amount requested for the
Boxwood Community Center was warranted. He thought there were
only about 300-400 people in the area. Mr. Sims said there were
considerably more than.that. '
Mr. Boege commented that he thought Boxwood had come in with
some specific figures. Mr. Sims replied that they had but he was
not sure how well the figures had been developed. It was agreed
that more information on both the Boxwood categories, street
improvements and community center, would be needed before the
numbers could be supported.
One item on the list included $20,000 for access curb cuts for
the handicapped. Messrs. Weibel and Richardson commented that
these should be identified.
Mr. Sims agreed that more detail would be needed before a recom-
mendation could be made on a $13,600 item, Health Care for Low-
Income. He commented that this summary list of proposals would
have to be worked over between now and February when the final
recommendations must be made and submitted to HUD.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Sims had prepared a computerized print out of what the Plan
Commission had done during the year and that might be of interest
to the members. Assured oftheirinterest he said he would run a
copy for each member for the next meeting.
Chairman Weibel thanked the members for their efforts during this
past year and wished all a happy holiday season and in return
received their best wishes.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business, the Chairman declared the meeting
adjourned at 8:40P.M.
Respectfully submitted,
Lynn M. Kloster
Phone 312 / 352-6000
SIGN REVIEW BOARD
Monday, January 9, 1989
Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
7:30 P. M.
SIGN -17-80., Lmdmark OutdoorAdvertising go J Industrial
AVIV—) 2220 Busse Road
This case has been continued from the December 5, and December 19,
1988 Sign Review 'Board meetings. The petitioner seeks relief of
Section 7.305 which permits a maximum of 1 freestanding sign per
lot of record. The subject lot has been divided into three parcels
and sold off in condominium fashion. The petitioner is seeking an
additional freestanding sign adjacent to the adjoining street in
order to identify the tenants on two separate parcels of property
within the lot of record.
A request by Western Development Corporation to vary the establi-
shed sign criteria for the Mount Prospect Shopping Center to permit
a change in the color of copy from yellow #2016 and, substitute
Yellow #2037 on the word "Way" and also to use white #7328 on the
word "Sub”. The petitioner seeks the use of these colors since
they are the registered trademark and colors of Subway Restaurant.
MAYOR
CARCL.N, If RAUSE
TRUSTEES
RALPH W. ARTHUR
\1 aw
'y�„�. ',d�✓
4
GERALD L RAfiI..E.Y
i
d!,
LEO f LORDS
NORMA J MURAUSKIS
„aEODODORFJ . WAr-IFN�ER�;
"REVA"`?`B
'Village of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON I31XON
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Phone 312 / 352-6000
SIGN REVIEW BOARD
Monday, January 9, 1989
Trustees' Room, 2nd Floor, Village Hall
100 South Emerson Street
7:30 P. M.
SIGN -17-80., Lmdmark OutdoorAdvertising go J Industrial
AVIV—) 2220 Busse Road
This case has been continued from the December 5, and December 19,
1988 Sign Review 'Board meetings. The petitioner seeks relief of
Section 7.305 which permits a maximum of 1 freestanding sign per
lot of record. The subject lot has been divided into three parcels
and sold off in condominium fashion. The petitioner is seeking an
additional freestanding sign adjacent to the adjoining street in
order to identify the tenants on two separate parcels of property
within the lot of record.
A request by Western Development Corporation to vary the establi-
shed sign criteria for the Mount Prospect Shopping Center to permit
a change in the color of copy from yellow #2016 and, substitute
Yellow #2037 on the word "Way" and also to use white #7328 on the
word "Sub”. The petitioner seeks the use of these colors since
they are the registered trademark and colors of Subway Restaurant.
MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT SIGN REVIEW BOARD
December 12, 1988
CALL TO ORDER:
The special meeting of the Sign Review Board (SRB) was called to
order by Chairperson Thulin at 7:37 P.M. Monday, December 12,
1988 at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount
Prospect, Illinois.
ROLL CALL:
Members of the SRB present: Pete Pointner, Warran Kostak and
Chairperson Thulin. Village Staff present was Kenneth Fritz.
Chairperson Thulin declared a quorum present.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
The minutes for the meeting of December 5 were presented. It was
suggested that the motion be included on the discussion of the
Rand Auto Mall indicating approval of the modification of the
sign panel. The motion was to approve the minutes of December 5
with the correction noted on a motion by Pete Pointner, seconded
by Warran Kostak. The motion passed unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS:
Sin -17-88 - Landmark Outdoor Advertisine ComDan
finis case was continued from the December 5 SRB meeting. The
petitioner was not present nor had he contacted the office to
indicate whether or not he would be present.
The SRB moved that Sign -17-88 be continued until January 9, 1989
subject to legal notice cost being borne by the petitioner in the
event they choose to modify their request. The motion was made
by Mr. Pointner, seconded by Mr. Kostak. The motion passed
unanimously.
NEW BUSINESS:
Sign -19-88 - Florenz Italian Restaurant - Randhurst Shoppin
Center - 999 North El;hurst Road.
Florenz Restaurant see k—sr--el—ief from the sign PUD ordinance
number 3666 adopted by the Village Board as it relates to the
Randhurst Shopping Center which requires that individual letters
be applied directly to the exterior of the building. The
petitioner proposes to install three signs measuring 16 feet in
length and 5 feet in height with a cabinet being approximately
10-1/2 inches deep. The petitioner seeks relief from the strict
interpretation of the condition of the planned unit development
in order to install the individually illuminated letters on top
of a cabinet of the dimensions in order to house the wiring for
the individual letters. The petitioner stated that if the
letters were attached directly to the building, the wiring would
otherwise interfere with the interior design of the restaurant.
Mr. Stephen Hoffner, Construction Manager for Jerrico Company
(Florenz Restaurant), indicated that the thickness of the
exterior walls are 16 inches, making it difficult to penetrate
the wall with the neon tubing. The point was raised by Mr.
Pointner that there should be a demonstrated hardship for each of
the three signs with regard to the interior design. Mr. Hoffner
identified along with Mr. Randy Calvanelli, also of Jerrico, that
on the front elevation, identified as elevation A, the sign would
conflict with the washroom door swing inside the front entrance.
The transformer and equipment could, therefore, not be mounted on
the interior wall without creating a problem for the door swing.
Elevation B, identified on the drawings as the west side of the
restaurant, contains a raised dining area with a soffit above.
This, therefore, would, present a construction problem on the
interior. Elevation C, which is identified on the drawings as a
south elevation adjacent to.the
the Randhurst water tower, has a sign
which would penetrate three separate rooms in order to install a
sign on the exterior wall.
Margaret Manzo, from Signcrafters of Arlington Heights, answered
questions regarding the technical aspects of installation of the
individually illuminated sign. She indicated that the sign
cabinet is being made as shallow in depth as possible and that
the color of the cabinet, to which the individual illuminated
letters would be attached, would be made to match the exterior
wall color in order to better blend in with the building. ,
A motion was made by Warren Kostak, seconded by Pete Pointner
to grant the request as the petitioner had submitted noting the
hardship involved in each of the three sign locations with
respect to the interior conflicts that would otherwise be
encountered. The motion on the request was passed by unanimous
vote, three ayes and zero nays.
ADJOURNNENT:
The meeting was adjourned at 8:03 P.M.
Respectfu y submitted,
Kenneth H. Fritz ti
Economic Development Director