HomeMy WebLinkAbout3854_001Next Ordinance No. 4027
Next Resolution No. 4-89
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F 8 U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Tine:
Tuesday
February 21, 1989
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Carolyn Krause
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Norma murauskis
Trustee Gerald Parley Trustee George Van Geen
Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Farley
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, February 7, 1989
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS To BE HEARD
A. Administer Oath of Office to newly promoted
Fire Lt. Dennis Amber
VII. MAYORIS REPORT
A. Appointments
B. Announcements
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 66-A-88, Text Amendments
1. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED
SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This case proposes amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance (Chapter 14) relative to standards for
size of residential garages; impervious surface
coverage; setbacks for parking in commercial
areas; satellite dishes in B-3 and B-4 Districts;
excluding retail uses in an I-1 District; and, to
permit day-care as a Special Use in B-1, B-3
and B-4 Districts and, driveway width of 15,
for a one -car garage. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended approving these text amendments
by a vote of 6-1.
(Exhibit A)
2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING
SECTION 21.601 OF CHAPTER 21 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance amends Chapter 21 by increasing
the height of fences in residential districts
from five feet to six feet. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended approving this text
amendment by a vote of 6-1. (Exhibit B)
B. ZBA 8-V-89, The Alter Group, Lake Center Plaza
Ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING SPECIFIED
VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
LAKE CENTER PLAZA IN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance grants certain variations as follows:
interior side yard requirement of 30 feet to allow
fifteen feet plus one foot for every two feet of
building height above fifteen feet; to allow a thirty
foot yard, rather than the required forty feet, for
side yards in an I-1 District adjacent to Residential
Districts subject to landscaping; to a twenty foot
rear yard in an I-1 District adjacent to Resident
District instead of the required forty feet; to allow
two parking lots or shared drive of service/loading
facilities rather than the required ten foot side and
rear yards; to allow a zero yard for loading and
ten foot yard for parking, instead of the required
forty feet and ten feet; to allow a five foot side
yard, rather than the required ten feet, where 2
parking lots abut, provided a minimum of 101 of
landscaped area be provided between the 2 lots. Also
requested are variations to permit a minimum 2 acre
parcel in the I-1 District, rather than the required
4 acres; to permit 2 parking spaces 121 x 351 for
buildings less than 40,000 sq. ft. in area, rather than
the required 12' x 501 loading space; and, to
permit a two parking lots of shared drive or service
facilities to abut in an O -R District, rather than the
ten foot side yard required. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these variations by a
vote of 6-0. These variations were approved by the
Zoning Board of Appeals and Village Board in 1987,
however the effective period of one year has expired. (Exhibit C)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 1-V-89, 1613 Rosetree
At the request of the Petitioner, this case is
continued to the March 7th meeting of the Village
Board.
B. ZBA 3-A-89 and ZBA 4-V-89, 420 W. Dempster -
Dempster Development Center
The Petitioner is requesting text amendments to
change the parking space requirements from 10 per
thousand square feet of floor area to 5 for specified
uses and to create a parking requirement for outdoor
swimming pools of one space per 75 square feet of
water area. A variation is requested to allow a
maximum building height of 38 feet for a gymnasium
building instead of the required 24 feet in an
R-1 Single Family District. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests by
votes of 7-0.
C. ZBA 5-Z-89, ZBA 6 -SU -89 and ZBA 7-V-89,
1796 S. Elmhurst Road, formerly Waterfall Restaurant
The Petitioner is requesting the property be rezoned
from B-3 to B-4 in order to obtain a special use to
permit drive-thru fast-food Mr. Beef restaurant and
a variation to allow a zero foot parking lot setback
from the south property line, abutting a service
station, instead of the required 10 feet, and a zero
foot parking lot setback from Elmhurst Road instead
of the required 30 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting all the requests 7-0, provided
the special use would be null and void if the
proposed use ceases to exist.
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Proposal for the annual audit
B. Proposal for fixed assets appraisals
C. Approval of payment to Arrow Road Construction
for catch basin and inlet repair contract
D. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
A. Reese's Plat of Subdivision
This plat divides one large lot into 2 lots
suitable for single family dwellings. The
Plan Commission recommends approving this
subdivision by a vote of 6-0.
"N 5111 "17
M
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR. MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FEBRUARY 7, 1989
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Krause called the regular meeting of the Mayor CALL TO ORDER
and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
to order at 7:30 P.M.
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Krause
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Gerald Farley
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Norma Murauskis
Trustee Van Geem
Trustee Wattenberg
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Arthur. INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved APPROVE MINUTES
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of the
Mayor and Board of Trustees held January 17, 1989.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Pass: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floras, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
616,352
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
7,479
Community Development Block Grant Fund
23,009
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
19,243
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
353,244
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,931
Risk Management Fund
99,878
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
197,274
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
287,783
Special Service Area Const. #5
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
Downtown R d
e ev. Const. Fund (1985) 4,335
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) ..
Debt service Funds 6,364
Flexcomp Trust Fund 576
Escrow Deposit Fund 21,453
Police Pension Fund 36,918
Firemens' Pension Fund 30,247
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,699,722
Upon roll call: Ayes:
Motion carried.
Nays:
Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
None
APPROVE BILLS
MAYOR'S REPORT
ACKNOWLEDGE Mayor Krause noted that the Mount Prospect Rotary
ROTARY CLUB GIFT Club has recently purchased a van through fund
raising events and presented the keys to the van to
the Village for use by the Human Services Division.
Mayor Krause presented Brian Wegrzny, President of
the Club with a plaque of appreciation.
OLD BUSINESS
AMEND CH. 6 An ordinance was presented for second reading that
would amend Article VI of Chapter 6 regulating cable
Television standards.
Trustee Farley suggested amendments to the Ordinance
as presented.
Mark Hess, presenting TCI, stated that while he is
aware of the proposed changes, TCI would like an
opportunity to revise the Franchise Agreement in the
near future.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4022
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: Wattenberg
Pass: Floros
Motion carried.
ZBA 66-V-88 ZBA 66-V-88, Text Amendments
AMEND CH. 14 Ordinances were presented for first reading that
Page 2- February 7, 1989
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS
R.HENDRICKS:
Richard Hendricks, 1537 E. Emmerson Lane,
M.P.PLAZA
complimented the Village on the new Public Works
Facility and their decision to honor the Director
of Public Works in naming the building the Herbert
L. Weeks Public Works Facility. Mr. Hendricks also
stated that he thought he should have been notified
about a recent case before the Sign Review Board
which granted permission to place signs on the rear
walls of the businesses backing up to Central Road,
since he had been an objector on a previous case.
Mayor Krause explained that Western Development
Corporation, owner of the Mount Prospect Plaza has
internal regulations prohibiting such signs and the
reference to these signs at the Sign Review Board
was simply to inform the Board members that they had
amended their regulations and now permit such signs.
BUDGET PROPOSAL
Trustee Floros stated that he would be unable to
attend the Committee of the Whole meeting on
February 14th, which is the f irst hearing on the
proposed budget for 1989/90 and stated that he
wanted to go on record that he can not support the
proposal to add 17 employees to the Village, stating
that he thought it was excessive.
BOY SCOUT TROOP
Scout Master William Penham of Lions Park School
#154: LIONS PARK
presented members of his Troop No. 154. The Scouts
were in attendance as part of obtaining their
Citizenship Badge.
MAYOR'S REPORT
ACKNOWLEDGE Mayor Krause noted that the Mount Prospect Rotary
ROTARY CLUB GIFT Club has recently purchased a van through fund
raising events and presented the keys to the van to
the Village for use by the Human Services Division.
Mayor Krause presented Brian Wegrzny, President of
the Club with a plaque of appreciation.
OLD BUSINESS
AMEND CH. 6 An ordinance was presented for second reading that
would amend Article VI of Chapter 6 regulating cable
Television standards.
Trustee Farley suggested amendments to the Ordinance
as presented.
Mark Hess, presenting TCI, stated that while he is
aware of the proposed changes, TCI would like an
opportunity to revise the Franchise Agreement in the
near future.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4022
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Murauskis,
Van Geem
Nays: Wattenberg
Pass: Floros
Motion carried.
ZBA 66-V-88 ZBA 66-V-88, Text Amendments
AMEND CH. 14 Ordinances were presented for first reading that
Page 2- February 7, 1989
would amend specified Sections of Chapter 14, entitled AMEND CH.21
"Zoning" and Chapter 21 dealing with the height of FENCES
fences in residential districts.
Richard Hendricks, 1527 E. Emmerson Lane stated that
he opposed the height standards for all fences within
the,Village to be increased from 5 feet to 6 feet.
These Ordinance will be presented for second readings at
the next meeting of the Village Board of February 21st.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that would AMEND CH. 11
amend Article XI of Chapter 11 by expanding the drug
and alcohol level and procedures for violating these
regulations as it pertains to taxi cab drivers.
It was noted that these standards are established by
PACE and in order for the Village to continue to
qualify for subsidized funding of the senior taxi cab
program, the Village must conform to the standards
set forth.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for ORD-NO.4023
passage of Ordinance No. 4023
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XI OF CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem
Nays: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented that would amend specified AMEND CH.10
sections of Chapter 10 and Chapter 11 dealing with & 11
the licensing period for business licenses. Effective LICENSE YEAR
January 1, 1990, all business licenses will be issued
on a calendar year basis, rather than fiscal year.
For the 1989 year, all business licenses will be pro-
rated on an eight -twelfths billing.
Trustee Arthur, seconded Van Geem, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur,
Van Geem,
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Wattenberg
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved for ORD.NO.4024
passage of Ordinance No. 4024
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 10 AND CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 - February 7, 1989
TIF: AMENDMENT An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would amend therecently enlarged Tax Increment
Redevelopment Project and Plan No. 1.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO.'4025 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4025
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT AMENDED TAX INCREMENT
REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AND PLAN NO. 1
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, ;
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 8-V-89 ZBA 8-V-89, Alter Group - Lake Center Plaza
LAKE CENTER PLAZA The Petitioner in this case is requesting variations
in conjunction with the development of an industrial
park north of Algonquin Road and just west of Elmhurst
Road. The variations requested; were granted by the
Village, in September, 1987, however since construction
did not begin within the required one year period,
those variations had expired. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting the variations by a vote
of 6-1.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the variations being the subject
of ZBA 8-V-89.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Van Geem, Murauskis,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.'
An ordinance will be presented for first reading at
the next meeting of the VillageBoardon February
21st.
Trustee Farley requested the staff to provide a report
outlining the changes in the Village Code since the
variations were originally granted in 1987
MFT: GENERAL A Resolution was presented that would authorize the
MAINTENANCE appropriation of $107,000 from Motor Fuel Tax Funds
for general maintenance during 1989.
Page 4 - February 7, 1989
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,
moved to for passage of Resolution No. 1-89
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING APPROPRIATION
OF MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
RES.NO.1-89
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented a request OLD ORCHARD
to approve the engineering plans for Old Orchard COUNTRY CLUB
Country Club Village Development. i
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to approve the engineering plans for the Old Orchard
Country Club Village development.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Dixon presented a proposal to expand the pilot
program to include the entire Village. In order to
Phase in the entire single family homes into the
program, additional bins would have to be purchased
and in order to be consistent with the bins used in
the pilot area, the Village Manager asked that the
bidding procedure be waived and authorization be given
to purchase the additional 12,003 bins from Rehrig
Pacific Company at a cost of approximately $4.73
for each bin. It was noted that the process of
phasing, in the entire community would take place
over a period of time with May 1, 1989 as the target
date for completion.
The Village manager noted that the State of Illinois
has a grant available and that purchasing bins for
recycling qualifies and if the Board authorizes the
purchase of additional bins, the appropriate grant
application will be made to the State for reimbursement
UP to $25,000.
Tim Corcoran, 524 Hill Street, stated that he is a
Member of the Recycling Commission and noted that the
Pilot program has proved to be successful.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Murauskis, moved
to expand the recycling program to include all single
family residences and authorized waiving the bidding
procedure in order to purchase 12,003 bins from Rehrig
Pacific Company at a cost not to exceed $57,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur,
Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Farley, Floros, Murauskis,
, Wattenberg
A Resolution was presented that would authorize the
Mayor to execute an agreement between the State of
Illinois and the Village of Mount Prospect relative
Page 5 - February 7, 1989
RECYCLING
CENTRAL RD
IMPROVEMENT
to the widening of central Road between Rand and
Wolf Roads. This is a joint venture between Des
Plaines, Mount Prospect and the State of Illinois.
RES.NO. 2-89 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Resolution 2-89
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
ADDENDUM TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, CITY OF DES
PLAINES AND STATE OF ILLINOIS RELATIVE TO
THE IMPROVEMENT OF CENTRAL ROAD, BETWEEN
RAND ROAD AND WOLF ROAD, AS ORIGINALLY
SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 1-88
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: Floros
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would accept the jurisdictional transfer of Central
Road, between Rand and Wolf Roads, from the State of
Illinois to the village of Mount Prospect. It was
noted that Central Road to the curb -side of Des
Plaines would be maintained by Mount Prospect and the
other side of the curb would be the responsibility of
Des Plaines.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4026 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4026
AN ORDINANCE ACCEPTING JURISDICTION OF
CENTRAL ROAD, BETWEEN RAND AND WOLF ROADS,
BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
authorize execution of the engineering contract
relative to the improvement of central Road between
Rand and Wolf Roads.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MFT: CENTRAL A Resolution was presented that would authorize the
ROAD IMPROVEMENT appropriation of $156,200 from Motor Fuel Tax Funds
which is the amount of money the Village of Mount
Page 6 - February 7, 1989
Prospect will pay towards the widening of Central Road
between Rand and Wolf Roads.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for RES-NO.3-89
passage of Resolution No. 3-89.
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Murauskis, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Village Manager Dixon presented proposals received AUDIT
from the following companies to conduct the annual PROPOSALS
audits for the next 3 years:
Karrison & Byrne
$43,200
Pandolfi, Topolski, Weiss
$46,300
Touche Ross
$50,165
Ernst Whinney
$51,750
Coopers & Lybrand
$54,000
Grant Thornton
$56,500
KPMP Peat Marwick
$64,500
It was noted by the David Jepson, Finance Director,
that Karrison & Byrne had been performing the audit
for the past 7 years and it might be an appropriate
time to change auditors. The recommendation was to
accept the proposal submitted by Touch Ross.
There was discussion by members of the Village Board
pertaining to the options and reasoning behind the
recommendation of staff. Trustee Floros noted that
prior to Karrison & Byrne, Touche Ross had been
retained by the Village and that the change was
made at that time due to the fact the Village was
not satisfied with the level of detail provided
by Touche Ross.
Additional information was requested by members of
the Board and this matter was continued to the next
regular meeting of the Village February 21st.
Trustee Murauskis left the meeting at this time.
The Village Manager presented a request to waive ASBESTOS
the bidding procedure and authorize entering into REMOVAL:
a contract with Asbestos Control Methods in order VILLAGE HALL
to prepare the documents and project management
involved with the removal of asbestos from the
Village Hall building. It was noted that this is
a specialized area and the total for this project,
excluding the actual asbestos removal project,
would not exceed $5,200. Mr. Dixon noted that
the estimated cost for the actual removal process
will be $4,000.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, ASBESTOS
moved to waive the bidding procedures and authorize CONTROL
Asbestos Control Methods to prepare the documents METHODS
and project management involved with the removal
Page 7 - February 7, 1989
of asbestos in the Village Hall building,
100 South Emerson Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Kays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Dixon noted that during the severe cold weather,
and as in the past, the train station will remain open
until 9:00 P.M. to provide shelter for residents.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
A request was presented to accept the public
improvements in conjunction with the jogging path
located within the Kensington Center for Business.
The jogging path was provided by the developer and the
Village of Mount Prospect, following acceptance, will
maintain the path.
Trustee Farley, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to accept the public improvements relative to the
jogging path within the Kensington Center for
Business, Phase II.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Kays: None
Motion carried.
EXECUTIVE SESSION
EXECUTIVE SESSION Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Farley, moved to
go into an Executive session for the purpose of
discussing pending litigation and personnel.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Farley, Floros,
Van Geem
Kays: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
The Village Board went into Executive Session at
9:29 P.M.
Mayor Krause reconvened the meeting at 10:27 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Krause
Trustee Arthur
Trustee Farley
Trustee Floros
Trustee Murauskis
Trustee Van Geem
Trustee Wattenberg
ADJOURN Trustee murauskis, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:28 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 8 - February 7, 1989
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
P W Facility Const. Fund A
P W Facility Const. Fund Series B
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
Special Service Area Const. #5
Special Service Area Const. #6
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
February 16, 1989
Cash & Invest.
Receipts
2/01 Through
Disbursements
Per Attached
Journal
Cash & Invest.
Balance
Balance
2/01%89
2/16%89
List of Bills
Entr
2/16/89
$ 1,325,592
$ 753,868
$ 786,419
<32,000>
$ 1,261,041
580,968
511 470
3 423
86,084
12;890
16,586
12,987
3,326
10,925
7 713
:
50,535
32,000
103
2,142,329
150,890
8 034
98,034
2,195,185
199,264
194,899
7,811
:
1,250,416
11,351
14,800
1,246,967
81,920
1,206
:
12,616
6,367
70,510
773,188
775,136
249,569
4,419
2,328
109,922
141,975
469,439
4 -013
,
_
545
472,907
208,080
206,555
1,525
-
914,026
4,226
-
918,252
6 356
3,156
7,362
25,783
2,150
1,151,928
1,152,052
25,659
139264,826
13,185,606
79,220
-
15,323,294
15,222,148
101,146
-
3,359
3,335
24
-
137,705.196
$1.257.528
1 145 402
-0-
37,817323
V LLL MVL U( I'IUVIY I rMUJ, - I
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL RtPURT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ABC PLUMBING
BOND REFUND C3L64
$50.00
S50.00*
AM INTERNATIONAL
BOND REFUND C458Z
5100.00
5100.00*
VIRGINIA BECCU
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
513.80
$13.80*
CENTRAL PLUMBING CO.
BOND REFUND C4808
$100.00
$100.00*
CITIBANK9 N.A.
PYMT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS
S8*117.71
58.117.71*
CITY TANK E PUMP
BOND REFUND C4715
$100.00
$100.00*
`-k�OK COUNTY COLLECTOR
08-12-101-015-0000
$29386.74
08-12-101-001-0000
$641.48
08-12-110-001-0000
$19145.01
08-12-110-002-0000
$241.55
$49464.78*
CONNIE UEBLASIO
BOND REFUND C4659
$100.00
$100.00*
DECKWERKS
BOND REFUND 04076
5100.00
$100.00*
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
PAYROLL PERI00 ENDING Z/16/89
$6Z9777.41
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING Z/'16/89
$49767.98
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 219/69
$3229862.57
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 2/'9/89
519481.41
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 2/9/89
$524.83
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 2/'9/89
531.034.50
$4239448.70*
MIKE DUGGAN
BOND REFUND C3610
$100.00
$100.00*
EVER READY
BOND REFUND 03248
$25.00
BOND REFUND C3Z48
$100.00
BOND REFUND C4833
$100.00
BOND REFUND C3248
$25.00
5250.00*
)RST NATIONAL BANK OF NILES
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$80.50
$80.50*
.-iRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PROSPECT
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF Z/'9/89
$99349.97
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 2/9/89
5111.25
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 2/'9/89
$39.41
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 2/9/89
529330.69
DUE TO FED DEP PAY OF 2/9/89
$440.05
$12:271.37*
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
MED BENEFIT REIMS 1989
S6*247.55
DEP CARE REIMB 1989
$711.00
MEO BENEFIT REIMd FOR 1988
$404.28
$79362.83*
THE FREDIANI GROUP
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$18.74
518.74*
PETER B. GEITTMANN
OVERPYMT FINAL WATER BILL
$11.50
311.50*
GRAHAM OIL COMPANY
FUEL
$4:905.00
$49905.00*
H E H ASSOCIATES
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$18.40
$18.40*
VILLAUL OF MUUNI PKUSF'tLl
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE Zf16/89
PAUL L
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
HUFFMAN GROUP
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
KALKOUNUS CONST.
PETE KONDILES
KEVIN MACNAB
MCKAY-NEALIS BUILDERS♦ INC.
MRS. RICHARD NITL
NORMANDY CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND C205Z
13OND REFUND CZ103
BOND REFUND C2039
BOND REFUND C2527
BOND REFUND C2101
BOND REFUND C2101
BOND REFUND C2099
BONG REFUND C253U
BOND REFUND C2791
BOND REFUND C2039
BOND REFUND C2527
80NO REFUND C39Z5
BOND REFUND C4105
BOND REFUND C2552
BOND REFUND CZ054
BOND REFUND C2755
BOND REFUND C2103
BOND REFUND C2791
BOND REFUND C2105
BOND REFUND C3925
BOND REFUND C2530
BOND REFUND 02099
BOND REFUND C2755
BOND REFUND C4105
BOND REFUND 02105
BOND REFUND 02552
BOND RLFUNO C2052
BOND REFUND C2054
EMPLOYEE SHARE IMRF
EMPLOYE2 SHARE IMRF
BOND REFUND 04595
BOND REFUND C4787
REFUND FINAL NATER
MAINT 63ND REFUND
FAST METER REFUND
BOND REFUND C232U
MOi4TH OF JAN 1989
MONTH OF JAN 1989
BI LL
$50.00
$25.00
$700.00
#
$68.12
$700.00
$
$75.00
#
$700.00
a
$100.00
#
$100.00
$100.00
$1,580.00
$15.00
a
$100.00
$925.00
$50.00
a
$ 3 b 0.00
$700.00
$200.00
$700.00
a
$200.00
$ 82 0* 00
$50.00
#
57 5. OU
$
S200.00
575.00
$7 5. OU
$700.00
$700.00
$10.203.12*
S13f 976.73
r
SZ7*207.86
5419184.59*
$500.00
$500.00*
5100.00
$100.00*
$43.30
$43.30*
$736.00
5736.00*
$310.50
$310.50*
$50.00
$50.00*
V E NO OR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
NORTHWEST HEATING C AIR CONDITIONING
OPUS
OSMAN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
RUDOLFO PRESTA
1 RAOIC
RITTER C SONS
R J C G SEWER
RMRS SYSTEM
RON ROBERG
SUM RltALTY
SPACE HOME IMPROVEMENT
MICHAEL P. STACHULA
SUN SPACE DESIGN
RICHARD UCHHAT
UPHOLSTERING BY ADAM
VILLAGE 'JF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
V ILL AUG U1- MUU=V 1 YKU�YtL 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND REFUND C4778
1100.00
1100.00*
BOND REFUND C3971
$375.00
1375.00*
BOND REFUND C3425
6475.00
1475.00*
MISC EXPENSES
520.00
MISC EXPENSES
130.00
650.00*
BOND REFUND C4784
$500.00
BOND REFUND C4784
$35.00
6535.00*
BUND REFUND C4854
$100.00
1100.00*
BOND REFUND C4757
6100.00
1100.00*
BOND REFUND C4535
$75.00
$75.00*
POSTAGE METER ADV DEP
13,000.00
13.000.00*
BOND REFUND C4U10
$100.00
$100.00*
REFUND FINAL" WATER BILL
117.02
117.02*
BOND REFUND C3681
$75.00
BOND REFUND C2505
$75.00
6150.00*
POLICE APPCIC REFUND
$10.00
510.00*
BOND REFUND 04346
$75.00
175.00*
BOND REFUND 02579
$500.00
1500.00*
BOND REFUND 0962
$100.00
$100.00*
FEB TRANS TO CIRR
sIv431.06
119431.06*
FEB TRF TO GENERAL FUND
689012.69
FEB TRF TO GENERAL FUND
61799dl.03
625,p993.92*
FEB TRANS TO IMRF FUND
1177.9Z
r
FEB TRANS TO IMRF FUND
$5*587.41
FEB TRANS TO IMRF FUND
197.60
159862.93*
FEB TRANS TO PARKING FUND
149000.00
s4v000.00*
FEB TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND
s9691Z6.00
FEB TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND
$169634.00
FEB TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND
$3U0.00
$1139060.00*
FEB TRANS TO TRUST FUND
II9808.00
s19808.U0*
REINSPECT FEE C205Z HOFFMAN GRP
s50.00
REINSPECT FEE 03925 HOFFMAN GRP
625.00
REINSPECT FEE 02105 HOFFMAN GRP
125.00
#
REINSPECT FEE C4535 RJCG SEWER
125.00
REINSPECT FEE C4784 R PRESTA
115.00
REINSPECT FEE C255Z HOFFMAN GRP
125.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT VAbt Y
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2116189
VENVOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOu4TS
,UBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
BUSSE'S FLOWERS E GIFTS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PUBLIL REPRESENTATION DIVISION
FLOWERS
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$114.75 $114.75*
$53.01 a
$36.88 $89.89*
***TOTAL** $204.b4
REINSPECT FEE
C3164
ABC KITCHENS
$50.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
C2505
SPACE HOME IMPR
525.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
02320
NORMANDY CONST
$50.00
REINSPECT FEE
02755
HOFFMAN GRP
$25.00
t
REINSPECT FEE
04346
SUN SPACE DESIGN
$Z5.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
C3971
OPUS NO
$125.00
#
KEINSPECT FEE
04617
DON WILSON CONST
$50.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
03681
SPACE HOME IMPR
$25.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
C3425
OSMON CONST
$25.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
CZJ99"
HOFFMAN GRP
$50.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
02054
HOFFMAN GRP
$50.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
C2101
HOFFMAN GRP
$25.00
#
REINSPECT FEE
C2103
HOFFMAN GRP
$75.00
$765.00#
DON WILSON CONST.CO.
BOND REFUND 04617
$450.00
$450.00*
***TOTAL**
$6739873.77
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
GENERAL FUND
$4999057.25
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK
GRANT
$'19770.58
ILL. MUNICIPAL
RETIREMENT FUND
$509534.56
NATER E SEWER FUND
$789849.31
$89117.71
PARKING SYSTEM
REVENUE FUND
$9bi.84
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$7936Z.83
CAPITAL IMPRV.
E REPL. FUND
$19436.56
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
ESCROW DEPOSIT
FUND
525x783.07
,UBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
BUSSE'S FLOWERS E GIFTS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PUBLIL REPRESENTATION DIVISION
FLOWERS
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
$114.75 $114.75*
$53.01 a
$36.88 $89.89*
***TOTAL** $204.b4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE Zt16I89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND SZ04.64
VILLAGE MANAGEROS OFFICE
CHARLES BENCIC
EXPENSES
$21.66
521.66#
4.ALLAG"AN E COMPANY
PUBLICATIONS
$137.80
$137.80*
FMISSION ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW
REGISTRATIONS
585.00
#
REGISTRATIONS
$85.00
5170.00*
GLASS• HILL• DALLMEYER E BOTH. LTO.
PROFESSIONAL SERV
$29913.00
S2*913.00*
MICHAEL E. JANONIS
EXPENSES
$340.00
$390.00*
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
584.75
MISC EXPENSES
$5.87
#
MISC EXPENSES
5102.91
#
MISC EXPENSES
558.63
MISC EXPENSES
$7.00
5259.16*
XEROX CORP.
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$139.61
$139.61*
20TH CENTURY PLASTICS
PLAQUES
$249.09
5249.09#
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$4vZ60.32
GENERAL FUND
S4s2`30.32
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
MICHAEL BARRETT
PAID VOLUNTEER
525.00
525.00*
RULNMANT INC.
SUPPLIES
$37.60
537.60*
DAK INDUSTRIES INCORPORATED
VIDEO EQUIP
5126.80
$126.80*
FOCAL PRESS
BOOK
$17.95
'517.95*
THE HIGHSMITH C0.91NC.
SUPPLIES
533.52
$33.52#
ILLIYUIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
SUBSCRIPTION
$2.50
52.50#
LONGMAN, INC.
BOOK
$34.95
$34.95*
VENDOR
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT.
JERRY RAJCZYK
REAL GRAPHIX
THE RELIABLE CORPORATION
ROSCUR CORPORATION
TASCHO SAEMS
SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS
4 LE TV OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
VLLLAIat Uh MUUNI PKUSPtLI PAUt 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2116189
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MISC EXPENSES
$75.32
$12.00
MISC EXPENSES
87.45
582.77*
PAID VOLUNTEER
$25.00
SZ5.00*
CABLEVIENS
$120.00
$120.00*
OFF SUPtILIES
$57.85
$57.85*
SUPPLIES
553.34
$16.83*
EQUIPMENT
$333.07
$386.41*
PAID VOLUNTEER
$25.00
525.00*
BOOKLETS
514.75
514.75*
$216.00*
***TOTAL**
$990.10
$990.10
COMMERCE CLEARING HOUSE• INC. PUBLICATION
GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIAT PUBLICATION
I.B.M. CORPORATION MAINT FOR COMPUTERS E PRINTER
MAINT FOR COMPUTERS E PR INTER
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 39Z-6000
ILLINOIS PAPER COMPANY PAPER
PAPER
1 TY CASH — FINANCE DEPT* MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
PEDERSEN C HOUPT TRANSFER TAX TRANSACTIONS
POSTMASTER VEH LIC POSTAGE
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY
V E G PRINTERS INC. LETTERHEAD
XEROX CORP. MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
SUPPLIES
$21.75
SZ1.75*
$12.00
512.00*
$184.00
*
$52.00
$236.00*
$3v096.86
53096.86*
$720.50
$43.05
$763.55*
16.78
$10.05
$16.83*
$260.00
$260.00*
$36.75
$36.75#
$55.22
$55.224
$8.90
$8.90*
$216.00
$216.00*
$139.61
V.
$75.66
$215.27*
VENDOR
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
XL/DATACO,4P INC.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
V ILLAUL Ut- MUU14 t rKUJrtL i
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MAINT SERVICE - FEB
MAINT SERVICE - J"AN
GENERAL FUND $49963.13
VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE
r Aur i
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$12.00
$12.00 $24900*
***TOTAL** $49963.13
MOSER-SCHMIDT PAPER CO.
PAPER
6758.52
%758.52#
MUNICIPAL CLERKS OF ILLINOIS
MEMBERSHIP
650.00
$50.00*
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$73.65
%73.65#
PADUUCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGA[ NOTICE
6245.70
#
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSUC.S.C.
LEGAL NOTICE
$168.35
$414.05*
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERY
$16.10
616.10*
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$19312.32
GENERAL FUND $19312.32
RISK MANAGEMENT
JOHN F. DIXON
PRESCRIPTION CLAIMS
$81.60
681.60#
FORT OEAR3ORN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY
LIFE INSURANCE -FEB 1989
$19664.60
%I9664.60*
JACKSUN9 LONG G ASSOCIATES9 INC.
JACKSON9 LONG 2/10/89
$49622.95
$4T67.2.95*
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
REIMBURSEMENT
$193.00
%193.00#
NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSUC.S.C.
SERVICES RENDERED
$41.50
REIMBURSEMENT
520.00
$61.50*
VENUJR
RISK MANAGEMENT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
POSTMASTER
RISK MANAGEMENT
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
INSPECTION SERVICES
VILLAUt Ut MUUNI PKUNMtL1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL RtPORT
PAYMENT DATE 1!'16/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MISC EXPENSES
POSTAGE FOR MAGALI+3ES
56v681.92
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC
$40.00*
REGISTRATIONS
B E H INDUSTRIES
$350.00
DRAFTING MACH S SUPPLIES
CECOMP
$35.00#
SUPPLIES
COUNCIL OF AMERICAN BUILDING
OFFICIA
APPLIC
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO.
$30.00*
SERVICES RENDERED
ILLINOIS COUNCIL AIA
$54.95
IL ACCESS CODE
ILLINOIS PLUMBING INSPECTORS
ASSOCIA
MEMBERSHIP
FRANK KRUPA
$45.00
EXPENSES
LANDCAD09 INC.
EZ WORD PRGM
R. S. MEANS CO.• INC.
$89.00
PUBLICATION
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
$216.00#
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
$166.95
MISC EXPENSES
$296.00
5296.00*
MISC EXPENSES
525.00*
$15,006.32
MISC EXPENSES
.EO WING SHOE STORE
$32.25'4
SHOES
SUBURBAN 3UILDING OFFICIALS CONFEREN
REGISTRATIONS
SUBURBAN BRANCH• A.P.vf.A.
REGISTRATION
TELEDYNE POST
SUPPLIES
FREDERIC TENNYSON
EXPENSES
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION
SERVICE
ESCAL REINSPECT
TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS•
LTD.
CENTRAL RD IMPRVMT
CHRISTINE VAN03RNICK
CLOTHING
XL/DATACOMP INC.
MAINT SERVICE - FEB
YAVt 0
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$14.68 514.68#
$43.59 543.59#
***TOTAL** $6v681.92
540.00
$40.00*
$5.61
55.61#
$350.00
$350.00#
535.00
$35.00#
$108.50
$108.50¢
622.50
$22.50#
$30.00
$30.00*
$118.50
$118.50#
$54.95
554.95*
$53.95
553.95*
$55.83
555.83;=
$45.00
58.67
$18.00
571.67#
$89.00
$89.00#
$216.00
$216.00#
$25.00
525.00#
$166.95
$166.95#
$296.00
5296.00*
$25.00
525.00*
$15,006.32
$159006.32*
$32.25
$32.25'4
512.00
VENDOR
INSPECTION SERVICES
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
POLICE DEPARTMENT
V1LLAtat Ur MUU141 rKU�rtL
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
11AINT SERVICE - JAN
$16,827.U3
ALLEN GROUP INC.
PARTS
AMERITECH !MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INC
MOBILE PHONE SERV
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS
ARLINGTON NTS CAMERA
PHOTO >UPPLIES
BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS• INC.
SUBSCRIPTION
BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO GASH• INC.
WASH PLAN -JAN
COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW
REGISTRATIONS
JOHN UAHLBERG
EXPENSES
DAWN FRIEDRICHS
VISION TESTING
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$38.00
REPAIRS
$38.00
REPAIRS
��v9ARON GORSKI
VISTON TESTING
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
MAINT AGRMT
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
39Z-6000
$17.71
392-1070
$150.OU
392-600,J
ILLINUIS INST. FOR CONTINUING LEGAL
VIDEO
ILLINOIS PAPER COMPANY
PAPER
ANN KRONQUIST
VISION TESTING
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL: INC.
BALANCE OF VAN LEASE
LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC.
PHOTO SUPPLIES
LITTLE AMERICA
PRISDNER FOOD -JAN
LUKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS E OFFICE SUPP
SUPPLIES
V A U L Y
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$12.00 $24.00*
***TOTAL** SI6-007.03
$43.00
$43.00#
$48.27
$48.27*
572.00
$7Z.00*
582.10
$82.10*
$96.00
$96.00*
$250.00
$250.00*
585.00
$85.00*
$6.00
56.00#
$60.00
$60.00#
$1,053.00
$38.00
#
$38.00
$1:109.00*
560.00
$60.00*
$578.49
$578.49*
$40.00
$17.71
#
$150.OU
5207.71*
$175.00
$175.00#
5216.00
$216.00*
560.00
560.00#
$88.85
$88.85*
549.44
549.44#
$138.90
$138.90*
$80.74
$80.74*
VILLAGE OF MUUI4T PROSPECT NAGE LU
ACCOUNf5 PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2116/89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
KAREN MARTIN
VISIGN TESTING
160.00
$60.00#
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
SUPPLIES
$101.64
$101.64#
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAINING
TUITION
$55.00
$55.00#
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTEM
MAINT
$552.00
5552.00*
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
DUES
$20.00
$20.00#
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$41.32
$41.32=
RUNALU W. PAVLOCK
ACCREDItATION DINNER
$323.20
$323.20#
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$18.00
#
MISC EXPENSES
$55.31
#
MISC EXPENSES
$19.31
#
MISC EXPENSES
$12.81
MISC EXPENSES
SZ.14
MISC EXPENSES
$17.50
#
MISC EXPENSES
$98.53
#
MISC EXPENSES
$8.75
MISC EXPENSES
$55.00
MISC EXPENSES
$8.79
#
MISC EXPENSES
$4.05
MISC EXPENSES
$19.24
#
MISC EXPENSES
$12.60
t
MISC EXPENSES
$34.51
5366.54#
ERIC E. PIEE
REPAIRS
$45.00
a
REPAIRS
$135.00
$180.00#
WILLIAM RUSCOP
EXPENSES
5296.25
$296.25#
SMITHKLINE CLINICAL LASURATURIES♦ IN
LESTING
$363.50
$363.50#
SPANISH-AMERICAN LANGUAGE NEWSPAPER
AD
$383.10
$383.10#
'TEU MICROLABS9 INC.
MICR-iFILMING
$33.16
$33.16#
)DATACOMP INC.
MAINT SERVICE - FEB
$60.00
MAINT SERVICE - JAN
$60.00
$120.00#
PULICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
S6v4O2.21
GENERAL FUND
$69402.21
VENDOR
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
DANIEL ACKERMAN
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES♦ INC.
ASEPTIC SYSTEMS, LTD.
B E H INDUSTRIES
BIUSAFETY SYSTEMS• INC.
8("--",N HARDWARE CO
BL fA
BUYING TIME SEMINARS
EDWARD CAVELLU
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
CHICAGO LOMMUNICATIUN SERVICE• INC.
COMPUTERLANU
COMPUTER SUPPORT CENTRES
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
DIXIE USA INC.
STEVEN DUMOVICH
ECKHARDT AUTO GLASS L TRIM LTD.
EDUCATION ALLIANCE
EGGHEAD DISCOUNT SOFTWARE
E� RESTAURANT
FAL- ON FASTENERS INC.
MICHAEL FIGOLAH
THE FITNESS WAREHOUSE
GFE• INC
JOHN GIBSON - F.Q.
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
HAGEN AUTO PAINT E SUPPLY
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
HAY MANAGEMENT C014SULTANTS
IGE# INCORPORATED
V ILLAbt Ur MUUN 1 rKUJrLL 1 r HUC L 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16189
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
EXPENSES
550.00
550.00*
SUPPLIES
$50.21
550.21*
JAN LINEN SERVICE
3223.18
$223.184
SUPPLIES
$62.13
562.13*
MAP SUPPLIES
$149.00
S149.U0a
MED SUPPLIES
$234.94
$234.94*
SUPPLIES
$13.30
513.30*
REPAIRS
$565.15
S565.15a
REGISTRATION
$65.00
$65.00*
EXPENSES
$36.50
S36.50V
BAKERY
S76.I4
576.14¢
PHONE SERVICE
$124.45
$124.45*
REPAIR
536.18
a
REPAIRS
$287.36
$323.54¢
SUPPLIES
556.00
556.00*
REGISTRATION
5320.00
a
REGISTRATION
5320.00
$640.000
PARTS
$245.00
$245.00*
SUPPLIES
5377.54
$377.54*
EXPENSES
559.00
$59.00*
REPAIR
$150.00
$150.00*
SUPPLIES
$338.00
5338.00*
SOFTWARE
S1*020.00
$$#020.00*
EXPENSES
$83.55
583.55*
CABIN+ETS
$307.16
5307.16*
EXPENSES
550.76
$50.76*
SUPPLIES
556.00
$56.00*
HOSE
$588.56
$589.56*
EXPENSES
$45.00
545.00*
TIRES
$472.75
5472.75*
EQUIP
32#285.00
$21285.00*
SUPPLIES
$298.63
$298.63x.
MAINT AGRMT
5257.25
$257.25*
TESTING SERV
$1*496.00
SIv496.00*
RENTAL
$16.00
SUPPLIES
$16.00
$32.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16%89
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONF CO.
437-3930
$50.00
$16T.78*
392-6000
550.00*
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS FOUNDATION
REGISTRATION
$189.00
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSOCIATION
FILM
g
ILLINOIS PAPER COMPANY
PAPER
$100.00
BRIAN IPSEN
PUBLTCATIONS
$43.66*
$266.00
EXPENSES
$100.00
R. KURDECKI
EXPENSES
$86.50*
LATTOF MOTOR SALES CO.
SUPPLIES
$77.24
'EASAMETRIC♦ INC.
RENTAL
$405.91*
IARLES LIVINGSTON
EXPENSES
$36.85
LUKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS L OFFICE SUPP
OFFICE SUPPLIES
M E R RAnIATOR INC.
REPAIR
$50.00
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
MED SUPPLIES
S400.000
$550.00
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
$112.07
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC.
CELLULAR PHONE SERV
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
CELLULAR PHONE SERV
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
PARTS
535.77
PARTS
529.27
NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS AS
MEMBERSHIP
NUkTHEA,STERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY
HEALTH EVALUATION
56.52
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
TUITION
ORR L ORR INC.
SUPPLIES
$75.00
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
TRAVEL• SUPPLIES*
MEETING
$tT871.00
TRAVEL~ SUPPLIES•
MEETING
TRAVEL, SUPPLIES,
MEETING
TRAVEL? SUPPLIES*
MEETING
TRAVEL~ SUPPLIES*
MEETING
TRAVEL• SUPPLIES•
MEETING
TRAVEL* SUPPLIES.
MEETING
TRAVEL• SUPPLIES$
MEETING
TRAVEL• SUPPLIES•
+MEETING
TRAVEL• SUPPLIES*
MEETING
RIVER RANO AUTO TRUCK C TRAILER RENT
TRUCK RENTAL
SERVICE AMERICA CORP.
EXPENSES
SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS♦ INC.
SUPPLIES
PAGE 11
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$117.78
*
$50.00
$16T.78*
$50.00
550.00*
$5.00
$5.00*
$189.00
$189.00*
$33.64
g
$203.75
$237.39*
$100.00
$100.00*
$43.66
$43.66*
$266.00
$266.00*
$100.00
$100.00*
$86.50
$86.50*
$75.00
575.00*
$77.24
$328.67
$405.91*
$45.95
$45.95*
$36.85
$36.85~
$175.62
$131.38
$307.00*
$50.00
$50.00*
$400.00
S400.000
$550.00
$550.00*
$112.07
$112.07*
$ 5.6b
$20.93
S20.00
535.77
529.27
$2.29
$ 6.99
56.52
SI7.10
$22.77
5169.30*
$75.00
$75.00*
$65.00
sb5.00*
$tT871.00
51.871.00*
VE NO OR
FIRE G EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
VLLLAUt Ut MUUNI PKUSPtLT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUBURBAN GAS SALES MED SUPPLIES
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHA REGISTRATION
VILLAGE OF HUFFMAN ESTATES CANDIDATE TESTING
VILLAGE OF MORTON GROVE REGISTRATION
D. WISNIEWSKI - F.D. EXPENSES
XL/DATAIL014P INC. MAINT SERVICE - FEB
MAINT SERVICE - JAN
FIRE b EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
INVOICE AMOUNT
5125.D0
$50.00
$1,425.00
$20.00
$50.00
563.00
563.00
***TOTAL**
GENERAL FUND 3179650.22 CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
!'ABC 1J
TOTAL
6125.00#
650.00*
51,425.00#
S20.oD#
$50.00*
$126.00#
518,036-15
$385.93
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTEM SERVICES RENDERED -FEB 529,41T.08 5299417.08#
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** S29,41T.08
GENERAL FUND $299417.08
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.,INC.
SENIOR CAS
RIDES
$604.50
$604.50#
LEONARD W. BALAN
HOM
DRIVER
REIMS -JAN
321.00
$21.00#
REUBEN BEILKE
HDM
DRIVER
REIMS -JAN
$21.00
$21.00#
SHARON BLALEK
HOM
URIVER
REIMB-JAN
$15.00
515.001
CAMILLE CHMELA
HDM
URIVER
REIMS -JAN
$6.00
$6.00*
VENOUR
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
HAZEL FAICKE
S. C. AND JEAN GOODLING
CAkOLYN HENDERSON
ILLINUIS BELL TELcPHOVE CO.
RAY LUNDIN
EARLE MATTSON
AUDREY MOEN
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT.
C THIA PERSHING
Q"ALEXt INC.
OTTO SCHERR
JEANNE SHLZ-RMA,4
BERTHA STEIL
TRI—R SIGNS• INC.
HELEN WHITLOCK
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
VILL MVL Ul riuu-'ll rnu�r LLi . - t
ACCt1UNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16189
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
HDM DRIVER
REIMO—JAN
$6.00
16.001:
HDM DRIVER
REIM13—JAN
$6.00
$6.00*
HDM DRIVER
REIMB—JAN
$12.00
$12.00*
392-6000
DELIVERY
$200.00
$200.00*
HDM DRIVER
REIMS—JAN
$36.00
:36.00*
HDM DRIVER
REIMB—JAN
$15.00
S15.00*
HOM DRIVER
REIMB—JAN
$9.00
$9.00*
MISC EXPENSES
$8.25
$123.00
MISC EXPENSES
$6.00
MISC EXPENSES
$94.35
5108.60*
HDM DRIVER
REIMS—JAN
$1,2.00
512.00*
PICTURES E
SLIDES
$7.01
57.01*
HDM DRIVER
REIMS—JAN
$3.00
$3.00*
HDM DRIVER
REIMB—JAN
$6.00
$6.00*
HDM DRIVER
REIMS—JAN
$12.00
512.00*
SERVICES RENOEREU
$250.00
$250.00#
HDM DRIVER
REIMS—JAN
$6.00
56.00*
***TOTAL**
$1.356.11
S1v356.11
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
MEMBERSHIP
$199.00
5199.00*
C.D.B.G. LOAN
CDBG
$536.50
5536.50*
DONNELLY L ASSOCIATESi INC.
CONSULTING SERV
$100.00
SI00.00*
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
DELIVERY
$28.00
528.00*
HEARTH L HOME INC.
FACADE IMPRVMT
%10.000.00
$10*000.00*
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SERVICES RENDERED
575.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$105.00
$180.00*
MOUNT PROSPECT VACATIUNSr INC.
AIRFARE
$123.00
$123.00*
VENDOR
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
V1LLAOt Ur' MUUll1 YKU4rLLI
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16189
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
NORTHWEST HEATING, C
AIR CONDITIONING
CDBG
NORTHWEST STATIJNERS
INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
PADDOCK PU3LICATIUNS
INC
LEGAL NOTICE
PETTY CASH - FINANCE
DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
33.87
53.87*
MISC EXPENSES
THE PERFECT IMAGE
$139.60
FILM DEV
INC.
$6*3ZO.00*
PHOTO PROCESS
1ALEX•
13ERVISION SEMINAR
SYSTEMS
SEMINAR
XEROX CORP.
DEC INVOICES
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
3-0 CONSTRUCTION
BRIDGE INSTALL
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
E3.894.00
23.894.00*
$50.86
150.860
$94.40
$94.400
$40.74
#32.08
$72.820
$4.55
$4.55*
33.87
53.87*
$295.00
5295.00*
$139.60
$139.60*
$6*320.00
$6*3ZO.00*
***TOTAL** $22*041.60
GENERAL FUND 510,825.10 COMMUNITY-DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT S11*216.50
STREET DIVISION
A 6 R ELECTRIC COMPANY
REPAIR
$63.85
$63.85*
LTIVE ALARM COMPANY• INC.
FIRE ALARM MAINT
$480.00
FIRE ALARM MAINT
$480.00
FIRE ALARM MAINT
$300.00
$1*260.00*
ADDISON BUILDING MATEi'IAL CU.
DEC INVOICES
$11.23
DEC INVOICES
$144.42
DEC INVOICES
564.21
DEC INVOICES
$55.46
DEC INVOICES
$55.46
0
DEC INVOICES
$55.46
DEC INVOICES
$55.45
$441.69*
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
SUPPLIES
$74.04
SUPPLIES
$48.42
$122.46*
ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC* INC.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAINT
$1x968.75
$1*968.75*
VE NO OR
STREET DIVISION
AMERICAN FORESTRY ASSOCIATION
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
LYNN RALLY
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT
BUCKERIDGE DOUR CO.
RICK HURY
CADE INDUSTRIES
ITRAL ACOUSTICAL SUPPLY HOUSE
L"EM RITv PRODUCTS COMPANY
CHICAGO TORO TURF E IRRIGATION.
ARTHUR CLESEN9 INC.
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
COMFORT SUPPLIES• INC.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMODORE MAIoJENANCE SYSTEMS
DOMTAR INDUSTRIES• INC.
AL DOWD
.HARDT AUTO GLASS L TRIM LTD.
MIKE FLAHERTY
JOHN FRIIS
GALAXY INDUSTRIES9 INC.
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
GRAND FRAME INC.
RAY HAMILTON
V 1LLAUt Ut- MUUN I YKUJYtL I
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PUBLICATION
CATCH BASIN E INLET REPAIRS
CATCH BASIN E INLET REPAIRS
CATCH BASIN E INLET REPAIRS
SNOW REMOVAL
PARTS
REPAIR
SNOW REMOVAL
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
INC. PARTS
SUPPLIES
UNIFORM RENTAL
UNIF,iRM RENTAL
SUPPLIES
B -JT-71224
B -JT-75954
S -JT-15954
3 -JT-75954
CONTRACT CLEANING
ROAD SALT
ROAD SALT
ROAD SALT
SAFETY SHOES
REPAIR
SNOW RE00VAL
SNOW REMOVAL
DRILL HITS
PAINT
PAINT
PAINT
WALL PRINTS
SNOW REMOVAL
INVOICE AMOUNT
$6.80
$292.50-
$19902.07
$49875.58
$102.50
S68.00
$77.50
562.50
$48.00
$2.887.50
$169.28
$ 350.76
$920.00
$156.22
$68.00
$92.68
$91.17
$98.96
S 89 339.67
S4,868.5Z
$5v071.82
$39767.48
S1,976.00
$39 2131.75
$49359.10
$3.226.34
$50.00
$100.00
$70.00
$145.00
$341.78
$175.63
5175.63
$175.65
$194.69
$57.50
rAUL to
TOTAL
56.80*
*
$6v485.15*
$102.50*
$68.00*
$77.50*
$62.50*
$2*935.50#
$169.28*
vt
$19270.76*
5156.22*
x68.00*
$183.85#
$98.96*
S22v047.49*
$19976.00*
$109867.190
$50.00*
SIOO.00*
$70.00*
$145.00*
$341.78*
*
$526.91*
$194.69*
$57.50*
V ILLNUC Ur +9UU+v i rKUarL%_i
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE Z/16/89
VENOOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
STREET DIVISION
JOH14 HANSEN
SNOW REMOVAL
P J HARTMANN COMPANY
TANKS DISPOSAL
EDWARD HINES LUMBER CU.
SUPPLIES
$8.69
SUPPLIES
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK 6 EQUIPMENT C OMPA
PARTS
ILLINOIS RANGE COMPANY
HOT PLATES
#.R.E V. CONSTRUCTION, CO.
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
'RIDER GREENHOUSE - PRAIRIE VIEW O1
PLANTS
LEWIS INTERNAIIOWAL INC.
PUBLICATIONS
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
LINUX LOMPANY
SUPPLIES
JOHN MARK
SAFETY SHOES
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
INVOICES NOV-OEC
MUUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC SCHOOLSr UIST.
SUPPLIES
$179.70
SUPPLIES
$179.70
SUPPLIES
$179.70
SUPPLIES
S1T9.70
SUPPLIES
$179.70
SUPPLIES
MUNICIPAL ARBORISTS E URBAN FORESTER
MEMBERSHIP
MURkAY AND TRETTEL INC.
SERVICES
NATIONAL BANKERS SUPPLY CORP.
SUPPLIES
DAVID NICIOLI
SNOW REMOVAL
ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELEC SUPPLIES
__�RTHWEST
ELEC SUPPLIES
$903.84
ELEC SUPPLIES
$265.25
ELEC SUPPLIES
5870.75
ELEC SUPPLIES
517.75
ELEC SUPPLIES
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
544.78
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$177.22
OFFICE SUPPLIES
KEVIN O'NEAL
SNOW REMOVAL
PALMER JOHNSON UISTRINUTORS♦ INC.
REPAIR
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
TRAVEL, SUPPLIES, MEETING
PETTY CASH - PU3LIC WORKS
MISC EXPENSES
r Mus L t
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$40.00
540.00*
S144e400.00
$14*40G.00*
550.75
a
$8.69
$59.44#
$337.92
$337.92*
$31.57
$81.57*
$29914.00
$2*914.00*
$250.00
$250.00*
$12.49
$12.49*
$22.70
522.70*
5234.64
SZ34.64*
525.00
SZ5.00*
5550.00
5550.00*
5179.70
R
$179.70
a
$179.70
$179.70
S1T9.70
u
$179.70
519078.20*
310.00
$10.00*
$800.00
$800.00*
565.00
565.00#
5160.00
$160.00*
$I40.83
$131.57
$903.84
$265.25
5870.75
..
517.75
$ZV329.99*
S63.00
544.78
$177.22
SZ85.00*
5230.00
5230.00*
$202.80
5202.80*
$35.91
535.9I*
$4.80
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
r ACP INCORPORATED
k,61ON 5 SALES 6 SERVICE• INC.
ROADWAY SIGNAL ANJ LIGHTING MAINTENA
SAM'S GLASS 6 TRIM• INC
SAUK VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO.
SEARS* ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
PAUL SEPANIAK
SOUTHLAND CARPET SUPPLIES
STANDARD INDJSTRIAL E AUTO EQUIPMENT
STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC.
TECH SYN LOkPORATION
TENG & ASSOCIATES• INC.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
T-)MPSON PUBLICATIONS
_LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JEFF WAGONER
RUBERT WELDON
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
HOWARD L. WHITE E ASSOCIATES, INC.
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
ROBERT YIU CONSTRUCTIONv INC.
STREET DIVISION
Y ALI MVI U. llljv.` 4 rt u4r i� I I ea uL ♦.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/89
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MISC EXPENSES
$45.00
MISC EXPENSES
$8.17
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$6.44
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$49.00
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$10.23
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$13.42
a
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$7.00
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$13.19
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$5.54
5162.79*
PARTS
$$0.07
$80.07*
SUPPLIES
$380.65
$380.65*
KEPAIR
$57.68
$57.68*
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MAI;VT
$179.60
$179.60*
REPAIRS
$162.74
$162.74*
SUPPLIES
$223.98
5223.98*
EQUIPMENT
$419.98
$419.98#
SNOW REMOVAL
$80.00
i80.00*
CARPET
$122.80
5122.80*
TOOLS
$395.00
$395.00*
SUPPLIES
$128.70
$128.70*
SUPPLIES
$84.50
SUPPLIES
$36.74
$121.24*
HVAC REPORT
s2r925.00
E2v925.00*
WELDING SUPPLIES
$52.81
SUPPLIES
$7.94
SUPPLIES
$162.17
$222.92=
PUBLICATION
$66.00
$66.00*
TRIALTA MAINT BOND
S3:585.71
$3 585.71*
SAFETY SHOES
525.00
625.00*
SNOW REMOVAL
$70.00
570.00*
PARTS
$25.80
$25.80*
OUTDOOR EQUIP
$893.OZ
$893.02*
REPAIR
s386.99
$386.99*
CONTRACT SERVICES
$19200.00
s1rZ00.00*
***TOTAL**
$87v958.66
M ♦llIl aiL VI IIVV.l1 • 1\V.!• L1.1 . •v �. +
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/16/69
VFNJUR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $669627.24 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $16*586.44
CAPITAL IMPRV. 6 REPL. FUND $4.544.98
######IIIIII#II*II*#P*# #PIIIIP IIIIPPIRP####IIP##*P##P#II* P#IIII�RP*P**rIIIRX�+R'II####�##IIyR#S�#irl��SII#3�C###�SikII'fi######�Rt-####a�## #k�
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
A-:-1 DISTRIBUTORS$ LTD
7 ISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
AWLTEC ENGINEERING
AWWA CONFERENCE 1989
B 6 H INDUSTRIES
BADGER METER INC
BRISTOL HOSE E FITTING
BUSSE MT. PROSPECT AUTO WASH, INC.
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CHARTERHOUSE PUBLISHING CO
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
IINOHUE G ASSOCIATES. INC.
GINcMASTERS. INC.
W. 4. GRAINGER INC.
HARPER C!)LLEGE
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
HINZ LITHOGRAPHING CO.
I.B.M. CORPORATION
GENERATOR
$815.81
$815.81*
DEC INYUICES
$26.50
SZ6.50*
SUPPLIES
$136.64
SUPPLIES
$74.03
$210.67*
SUPPLIES
$72.52
II
SUPPLIES
$280.78
$353.30*
MAINT SERVICE - JAN
$550.00
$550.00*
REPAIRS
$792.00
$792.00*
REGIST0,TION
$310.00
$310.00*
DRAFTING MACH L SUPPLIES
$650.45
$650.45*
METERS
52T278.50
$2.278.50*
PARTS
$109.20
$109.20*
CAR WASHES
$84.00
$84.00*
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$73.60
$73.60*
FORMS
$18.41
$18.41*
UNIFORM RENTAL
$92.68
UNIFORM RENTAL
$91.16
$183.64*
ENGI`gEERING AGREEMENT
$19110.18
$1.110.18*
PARTS
$66.75
$66.75*
EQUIP
$81.90
$81.90*
TUITION
$350.00
$350.00II
WATEK METER EXCHANGES
$218.75
WATER METER TESTING CONTRACT
$323.40
WATER METER EXCH
$250.00
WATER METER EXCH
$437.50
METER TEST E REPAIR
$464.89
II
MATERIALS
$118.68
$111313.22*
PRINTING
$410.00
$410.U0*
MAINT FOR COMPUTERS G PRINTER
$52.00
MAINT FOR COMPUTERS 6 PRINTER
$184.00
$236.00$
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2116189
VCNDJR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOIAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ILLINOIS 13ELL TELEPHONE CO.
255-454Z
$17.29
#
392-6000
$300.00
$317.[9#
JOURNAL E TOPICS 44EWSPAPERS
LEGAL NOTICE
$40.95
$40.95#
LINOX COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$234.63
$234.63#
JOHN MARK
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
$25.004
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
INVOICES NOV-DEC
$2v300.00
4
INVOICES NOV-DEC
$19040.22
S3v340.Z2*
MURTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
PARTS
'$46.20
$46.20#
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
PARTS
$100.80
$100.80*
N.S U. TOOLS/ NEAL WOLF
REPAIRS
$22.84
$22.84#
' MIDWEST• INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$120.00
$120.00#
i-ATHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SS GOLF IW WAPELLA
$12.77
512.77::
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELEC SUPPLIES
$7.88
#
ELEC SUPPLIES
$164:20
$172.084
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$203.95
#
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$44.78
5248.73*
PADDICK PUBLICATI+.INS INC
LEGAL NOTICES
$40.00
540.004
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
MISC EXPENSES
$54.50
#
MISC EXPENSES
$80.00
4
MISC EXPENSES
$1.24
#
MISC EXPENSES
53.20
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$13.57
#
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
$35.22
#
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
$15.11
#
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$3.21
4
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$12.01
#
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$5.33
$223.39*
E --'SON ELECTRIC PANEL MFG. CO.
ELEC REPAIRS
$2v2Z5.00
$2x225.00*
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PARTS
580.06
$80.064
POSTPIASTER
POSTAGE FOR WATER HILLS
$388.80
$388.80#
SAUK VALLEY EQUIPMENT CO.
SUPPCIES
5223.98
$223.98#
SNAP-ON TOOLS CORPORATION
TOOLS
$20.85
$20.85#
SYSTEMS FORMS9, INC.
ENVELOPES
$132.92
$132.92#
TECH SYN CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
543.89
543.89*
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
WELDING SUPPLIES
$52.81
#
TOOLS
$15.16
$67.97*
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $29483.91'
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
HRONNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE DISPOSAL $1231417.16 $1231417.16#
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** 51239417.16
GENERAL FUND $1231417.16
V 1LL. NVC U1 ,9Uu+V 1 rmu4, a_%, 1
i raves —
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE ZJ16/69
VEN?UR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
NATER AND SEWER DIVISION
TEXAS INSTPUMENTS INCORPORATED
MAINT AGRMT
$180.00
1180.00#
JEFF WAGONER
SAFETY SHOES
$25.00
(25.00#
NEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
SUPPLIES
$302.69
$302.69#
ZIEBELL NATER SERVICE PRODUCTS• INC.
SUPPLIES
(23.96
523.96#
NATER AND SEWER DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$191184.35
WATER 6 SEWER FUYD
5191134.35
######### ####zitc####�#########ttfk######R###tt#######iki►###tt�X#�###1R#####+R###�gLI#3II1R####��X###YxX�SI�#tsts#,t#Yc##i�###
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO C NORTHWESTERN TRANS CO
LAND LEASE JAN
— $21251.81
$21251.81#
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
19 NORTHWEST HY
$232.10
5232.10#
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$29483.91
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $29483.91'
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
HRONNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES REFUSE DISPOSAL $1231417.16 $1231417.16#
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** 51239417.16
GENERAL FUND $1231417.16
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
HENRICKSEN
GLENN H. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
Y lLL.V, Vi IiUV.I fmV Jt lk.I
ACCOUNTS PAYASCE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2116189
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
DEC INVOICES
OFF FURN
P W FACILITY
TRF TO NGS FOR CONST COSTS
INVOICE AMOUNT
1544.89
$178.98
$12.437.00
S1099922.00
***TOTAL**
TOTAL
5544.89*
$178.98$
SI2v437.00#
$1091922.00#
S123r082.87
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 $544.d9 P N FACILITY CONST 19878 SI2s6I5.98
SSA 05 CONST. LAKE MICH. WATER 11091922.00
#3L3L'#tt#t####i9####t`$$###$###$#$+F$$###$#$#at$####$#$#$##$#$$##$#$###$$$#$$$#rR$##$#****$.##
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
NORTH«EST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY ELEC SUPPLIES $5.75 $5.75$
SHELTER/ INC. ALLOL — 4TH PYMT $2,000.00 $21000.00#
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** $21005.75
GENERAL FUND
$2*005.75
.NSION FUNDS
CHARLES W. NICK FEB PENSION 5883.22 $883.22#
PENSION FUNDS ***TOTAL** $883.22
GENERAL FUND
5883.22
ALL DEPARTMENTS TUTAL $111451402.30
DATE RIJN Z/16/t19
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPELI PAGE 23
TIME RUN 11.44.55
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING ID-VAP155
SUMMARY BY FUND 2/'16/89
N0.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUN}
$786x418.88
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
516086.44
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
5129987.08
24
I'LL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
5509534.56
41
WATER C SEWER FUND
$98,033.72
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$39445.75
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$149799.63
51
CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND
$69367.47
55
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985
$5+4.89
57
P W FACILITY CONST 19878
5129615.98
58
SSA 05 CONST. LAKE MICH. WATER
$109,922.00
73
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
$79362.83
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
SZ59783.07
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 5191459402.30
***********************************************************$************************ ******************xF*
General and Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
P W Facility Const. Fund A
P W Facility Const. Fund Series B
Capital Improvement Repl or Repair Fund
Special Service Area Const. #5
Special Service Area Const. #6
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust, Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FINANCIAL REPORT
January 1, 1989 - January 31, 1989
Fund
Balance
Dec. 31. 1988
Revenues Expenses
for for
January, 1989 January, 1989
Fund
Balance
Jan. 31. 1989
$ 2,318,267
$ 829,613
$1,358,610
$ 1,789,270
541,066
102,704
48,216
595,554
10,916
21,000
29,967
1,949
< 87,113>
8,729
40,589
< 118,973>
13,710,532
426,893
598,314
13,539,111
492,876
13,952
4,294
502,534
1,314,780
138,054
52,862
1,399,972
288,721
2,090
199,881
90,930
1,476,191
9,107
693,854
791,444
359,491
2,328
109,922
251,897
506,489
15,155
-
521,644
206,555
1,526
-
208,081
816,797
61,310
555
877,552
13,228,282
118,391
36,918
13,309,755
15,230,848
108,009
30,247
15,308,610
3,342
18
-
3,360
$50,418,040
$1,858,879$3,204,229
$49,072.690
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGr
� 1
ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD
09 ENOIN3
1/31/89
1988-99
Y -T -O
Y -T -D
CUR MO
UNRFt•J
X
3UDGET
ESTIMATE ACTUAL
ACTUAL
BALANCE
bALA1:CE
NAL
GEtJEHAI FUND
TAX REVENJE
1-U3U-00-4001
TAXES-CORPURATF CURk"NT
1.279.40(`
959.544
1.279,400-
t,27+.400-
100-
1-00U-00-4001
TAXES -C UtPORATE PkiOk
1,b20.400
1,215.297
1,545.4`15
74,914-
74.914-
5-
i-UJ0-O4-4004
TAXES -GARBAGE CURRENT
613,800
4bO,350
613,600-
613.800-
tJG-
I-UOU-00-4005
TAXES-GARPAGE PRIOR
847,400
635,544
flog. 191
39,2u9-
39.2u9-
5-
1-J00-00-4010
TAXES-!')THRDG CURRFNT
13.000
9,7X7
I3s00U-
13,000-
lOG-
1-UOU-00-4011
TAXIS-RDFAROG PRIOR
.7.000
12,744
11,886
5,114-
5.114-
30-
1-005-00-4013
-.LTAILFRS OCCUPATION TAX5,02',000
3,768,750
3,648,892
446,597
1.376,102-
1,376,108-
27-
1-000-00-4015
FJREIGN FIRE INS TAX
221000
16,497
2Z.630
b30
630
3
1 -00u -J')-4016
%UTfJ RENTAL TAX
L,ZUO
900
998
325
202-
202-
IT-
L -000 -OJ -4017
ALAL LSTATE TkA'ISFER TAX 14J*000
104,994
155,939
10,799
15,919
150939
11
1-000-00-4018
FGOU L BEVERAGE TAX
475,000
356,247
403,065
4Z*943
71,935-
71.935-
l5-
1 -00U -0o-4 U20
t_LFCTRUPtICS RA4E TAX
12,000
9.000
11.250
750-
750-
6-
I -00U-00-4064
PERSOVAL PROP FEPL TAX
15(.000
1.12,500
124.405
2,595-
25,595-
17-
t-UU0-UG-4065
PERSUVAL PROP RFPL REU
39500
2,619
2.508
2,006
992-
992-
28 -
VITAL TAX :_Vt1di"t-
21-000
7,664,733
6,735,250
502,670
3,484.450-
3,484,45G-
586 -
FEE REVENUE
1 -00J -UO -41')I
BUILDING PERMIT FEES
375,OU0
281,250
353,397
12,138
71,603-
21,603-
6-
1-000-00-4102
F_CECTRI(AL PFRMIT FEES
b;*500
51,372
579IT7
2.342
11.323-
11.3;3-
17-
1-000-00-4104
PLUMBI'TG PFRMIT FEES
31,000
220500
33.746
1.725
3.746
39746
12
t-000-00-4105
PLAN EXAMINATIOm FEES
SC,OUO
31,494
49,644
39053
356-
356-
1-
1-000-00-4106
STREET 'IPENING FEES
t,500
1.125
600
200
900-
900-
SO -
1 -000-00-4107
VEHICLE LICENSE FEES
730,000
547.497
171,793
B,T70
55x'.208-
558*207-
76-
1-U00-00-4108
OHx, LICENSES
12,500
91369
1.339
15
119161-
119161-
09-
1-000-00-4104
LIJUOR LICFNSLS
1279500
95,625
1269182
19680
1,316-
1,318-
I.-
1 -000 -JO -4110
+0JSIA,SS LICt:NSFS
1559000
116,244
155.910
39413
910
910
1
1-OOU-00-4112
PU9L[� IMPR INSPECTIONS
90.000
67,500
106,799
3,963
16,799
16,799
19
L -00U-00-4113
RENTAL FEES
2.400
1,800
2,915
575
575
575
Z4
1-000-00-4114
FLIS-30ARD OF APPEALS
10.000
12,500
14,414
2,057
15,586-
15,566-
52-
1-U00-00-4115
CtNTtL FRANCHISE FEES
26,000
199494
28,997
149819
2,997
2,997
12
1-000-00-4116
UELL SYS FRANCHISE FEES
93,000
67.500
58,796
7,461
31.204-
310204-
35-
1-OOU-UO-4119
ELSVAFOR I>ISPECT[UN;
10,000
7,497
IZ,036
Z.004
2,036
2,036
20
i-000-00-41Zu
FALSE ALAR14 FEES
h.0J0
4.500
7,538
840
1,535
1,538
26
I-UDU-00-4121
CA9LF TV FRANCHISE
E+0.000
LU4,994
103,632
36,361-
36* 364-
26 -
TOTAL FEE REVEL.Ut
to 344 :400
1.458,261
1.284.975
65.066
659.426-
559.425-
34 -
INTERGOVERNMENTAL
REV,-NUE
1-01ju-00-4150
STA1C INLJME TAX
1•S4).Do-1
1,125,000
1.0839912
132.233
416,128-
416,116-
28-
1 -WO -OJ -4151
P110TUFINTSt'IiN6 FAX
43,000
29,997
35,306
4,579
3,694-
3.694-
9-
1-J00-00-4152
t:R..NT-ILEC POLICE TR71G
12.000
9.004
30,872
18.672
19,87Z
157
1-000-J,'i-4153
;RANT -STATE FIRE TRAING
129VOo
9.000
13,574
1,574
1,574
13
1-UOJ-OU-4154
GRANT-SR.CITIZiN TAXI
12.000
9.000
9,176
1,345
2.944-
2. 8Z 4-
24-
1 -00u -UO -+155
FUVEST KIVIu RUPIAL FPL)
1',.030
11.250
2,750
12,250-
129250-
91-
L-ODU-0o-4156
EG TW" FMP.COUNSELu,(
12.030
9,000
13,042
129104
1.342
19042
9
L-OOU-00-4159
JL001) RcIMLURSEMENTS
15.353
1',353
15,153
U
TOTAL 1NTERG3+IERNMt
TAL REVFVUE
I,66J,000
1.202,747
19204.945
155.611
34U,C55-
3949055-
25 -
SERVICE CHARGE
REVEIIUF-
1-UJu-00-4175
b & S SERVICE CHARGE
160.000
119.997
IZ9,001)
159000
32. GJ0-
329000-
20-
1-000-00-4183
AMdULANCF TRNSPRT FEE
40,000
29.997
22,071
1,995
17,929-
17,929-
45-
VILLAGL OF MOUNT PRCSaECT
ESTI:iATEU REVENUE REPORT
ACCnUNTGaG PERIUO 04 ENDING 2/31194
1'1N8-8? Y -T -O T -T -U CUP '1O
GE%C't AL FUNI, .;U UGET E>TlnTt ACTUAL ACTUAL
TUFAL SFRVICC LHAkd= REVE'd L1R
?0.: , 000
PARKING REVUiUL
150, 071
179995 : 95
I -U00 -Ur, -4116
I-U0u-00-4217
'INE', - LUCAL
-lLl
140,000
I -.)U a-JU-4218
F -I - CIRf_�.'IT COURT
PI%L-S - LUCAL hrtOINANCES
Id5,0J0
5.000
TOTAL PARK[t:t;
RF VErvJF
178,149-
1 38, 744
119,023
3 Al,. OQO
OTHER PLVENUE
3.744
2d6
1-0"0-U0-4231
-SLE `lE CUD€ '%UuKS
I, 750
1-JU5-GJ-4245
"ENIUk CEitTLP REVEti'LF
5.000
1-100-Grf-4244
SPECIAL DETAIL
+1.000
1--?U0-Ou-4Zv$
'f
L{.QUO
1-JUu-U+)-42`+6
L-000-Q+5�-42a7`*,)LICr
RLlha YU1)TN COUNSELING
30,500
1- 0u -u0-4246
L FIRE RI -PORTS
1,iT Rf:ST INCOME
12,000
1-Uuu-00-:244
"ISCELLANLOUS INCU,,E
130.000
8297613
Mht1T 1NTFkEST OISTl,(6UTN
30.000
1-00 -00-42',1
4253
Ia+TCs1�°.T - tSCk0W FU -0
1`,000
70,000
1-,15u-O)_4c55
-LOIk, LUANS INT RkST
2 r
I-U0u-00-4256
s LU€') LUANS fgRI4CIFAt
,925
53,�r10
1-U9U-U('-4Zb4
a-O')U-OJ-4264
MAVIT. OF SKATE hwy)Y .
4Jr?[4
LU,755
KE.I,''4P - CLPIRAL RUAU
22.500
I -0)S -J0-4270
TRANS FkOh TRUST ACL€ S
5+'.000
I-J1u-Ut+-4[72
RFIMIS - " P ARY
X7555
1-UFJU-OU-4273
SURVFILLANCtr1REVENUt
55, 757
1-UUO-UO-4175
�,HAR=`) GIST
20,943
PAUL
INkFC°J
.ALAP,CF BALAVC= :1A
149, 994
150, 071
179995 : 95
19.747
I-)1)0-00-4277
4'1x9`9-104,994
5/ ,000
93,7U6
3.102
178,149-
1 38, 744
119,023
1:..180
_
3.744
2d6
I TAL OT#{€ S
65,477-
247,4N2
21 3.015
24,282
4,714-
102,704
12.704
59" .000
LI6.995-
1,305
I.lb6
19?
3#744
3.598
14-
582-
7.497
4r60j1:4uZ-
371
8297613
1,497
9.802
19637
5, 397-
22,864
1856@
39456
1r199-
9,000
4r19R
1:227
11 ,432-
97,447
114,944
LU,755
2.912-
22.500
15,25T
•
2,547
10,0Sb-
19,747
14.778
X7555
14,743-
J"'497
55, 757
9,53-,
'>r22Z-
20,943
19.771
2:045
14,243-
40.050
40.132
4.151
8,154-
31), 681
20, 772
13.218-
23,422
23.922
20:143-
3T,444
ZJ 9,.2
5'T, uUQ-
1-JUU-05-- 4,76
-" IU( -WALK
,t!ARU'! COST -TREE kEPLC15.210
25.000
19.747
I-)1)0-00-4277
Flkt I: Al ING Pin.
C AM
5/ ,000
,2.500
40.224
178,149-
I-uQS-QD-4,`79
GE3`IERAL CLE AN I= Tit ACCOUNT
2:iU0
1,872
14.465
2rD5fl
I TAL OT#{€ S
9,vNU
}L-
94te000
7 04,4`)7
765.107
102,704
12.704
59" .000
415.440
431.654
63,484
TOTAL GE-,cRAL FU:)
174, A31-
174,rt 33-
14-
----------_
---_ -.A
4,95!
_- .TU011,13.3*15710.019,915
8297613
MCTOR FUEL TAX FUND
INTO GUV,RNW,4FAL RV-NJE
22 -O0�-Utt-41`•5 ,� F f fiLL+�C AT 11,.E
22-�)G-O -4142 +�IMG`htSeMT .JN PROJECTS
22 -JOU -O+)-,249 INTFP� ST MuME
TUfAL INTERG'1Y-RtcMrEFAL REVF^tUF
TOTAL-=+JTU+t-- -11110
FUELFAKr------------------
COMMUNITY UEVLP.4T ,L)LK Gk ANT
INTt�;GOV�.JNN :NTAL REVEt'U`
23-Uu,1-00-4155 LUf'G 1.R A 4T
47 74Q-
IU.ZZ4
IZ,46`.
I22.341-
4.831.1J6-
4'•429- 1
40,244- 3
65,477- 3
4.714- 9
11:,985- 3'
582-
1,402-
5:347- 5a
L 1.93 ?-
10.056-
1-4. M 3-
-10.056-14.743- 4'
5,222- 21
14.243- 2C
tI, 154- 29
13,-'78- Z`
20, 14 3- .tc
23,522 E
555.000- tU0-
C
0
4,740- 34
10,2'24 34
12.465 499
G
L22.541- Z2-
331 , 185-
L
,UqU
663,750
706,751
81 5s
31,000
11,500
2U,b52
16,676
178,149-
174,244-
2r+_
25,000
13.747
37.764
3,525
`1,344-
4,349-
}L-
94te000
7 04,4`)7
765.107
102,704
12.704
12.764
51
4'tU,OJO"
704.997
765,167
174, A31-
174,rt 33-
14-
102,794
174,531-
174:ry33_
14-
44._,500
33.,975
141,OCO
11.050
39 L,'5u0-
301, St•0-
63-
VIttAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTIMATEO kEVENUF REPORT
ACLOUNTT;JG PERIOD U9 ENOIN� 1/31189
199;9#-:39 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR HG
`10MET ESTINATL ALTUAL ACTUAt
COMMUNITY UEV LP HI NLU;;K GRANT
INTERGOVERNMENTAL H�VtNUi:
23 -000 -UO -4241 PRCGVAi INCOME
TOTAL INTECGOVf kNM-"MTAL kFVE�rUt 29,440
-- 442:500 331.875 170,9#40 11,000
TOTAL- C011MUNI TYO= VLPP�TPLUCKG`iANT4yi
_
'- ---___
.500
331,675
170.410
11 ,C=00
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIRF4fNT FUMD
TAX REVENUE
24 -000 -JO -4055 TA(ES - CURRENT
19j,30O
145,350
24-09U-30-4056 TAXE., - PRFOR
24-uOi-JU-4064 PLRSOVAL
231,900
113,925
221,168
PROP REPL TAX
FUTAL FAX tEVE;vU�
55,000
41:247
B,lOfi
.3,70,5
-
4dJ,700
36�J,522
229,894
3,706
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
24 -00U -UJ -4225 TRANSFER FROM GF.N. FUND
24 -JOU -00-4246 INTERrST INLOME
TOFAL INTERFU'IU TRANjFtnS
949
23
949
23
TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL REiIkr" NT FUNO
48,1.700
360,522
-------_---_
------------------------------------------
230,843
9et29
LIBRARY FUND
TAX REVENUE
39-000-00-4011 TAXES - LIlRARY SERVICES1.4J4,51'5 1,053,432
9
3-000-00-4037 TNXES - 14RF 135,990 IJ2.735
39-UUU-OL-4039 FAXES - NAINT C REPAIR 117,010 61.750
39-J00-00-4039 TAXLS-INSURANCE E AUDIT 11,295 20,466
39-01)u-UU-4064 PERSU!JAL PROP REPt TAX
34-4;u U-uti-4154 "THtk IW ONE 492,395 369,288
TUTAL TAX REVJJPU� 2,116,275 1.633.671
TUTAL L1` RAINY FU'41, 2,17H.215 11633,671
NATE4 L S iWt:R FUND
FEt 8EVLNUE
41-UU0-0•)-4119 3LWIR IN5PECTIUN FFVS
T, I AL FEE REVI, aU,
INTE'.GUV6k NMFNTAL RtVL,JU
4i-UU0-0)-4157 GRANT - P M SEWL-p
41-C!)U-00-41:11 :LATER SAL'_`.
41-+J00-00-4212 si_4F, FF.LS
41-0(,0-Uo-42Uj WATEtz FENALTTLS
41-000-00-41114 "LTER FENTAL
it+. 000) 37,494 50,715 2.232
50,000 37,494 50,715 1,Z3e
3.570.000 2,617.500 1.851.905 266.217
33-,000 251,Z44 284,548 239421
X0.000 37,494 30.46U 2.199
2.1,000 14#994 38.300 1,175
tJNRFC'D
BALAiyL E
29,440
2T2,06U-
272.060-
193,80U-
19712-
46:2 9,#-
'50 , not -
949 4-
250,u06-
949
949
247,fiS7-
1.404,585-
136,990-
117,J10-
21,295-
492. 395-
2,178,275-
2,1T8,275-
115
115
7 18 , U', 5-
5U.472-
k ", 540-
IE,3UQ
PAG'`
is
PALANCE NAL
19.44U 0
272:Oa0- 61-
472,060- 61-
I93.H00- 100-
10.712- 5-
46.294- - -.
25U,806 -
u
949 Q
949 0
249,,157- 52-
1.404,5:15- 100-
136,49Q- 1p0_
117.010- lOC-
27,295- 1)0-
0
492,'95- LOC-
2.178.275- 1UC-
Z9i7H-li- 10[1
115 1
715 1
Q
719,095- 20-
50,472- 15-
19#"o- 39-
LH.300 92
HATL'- C _-MFP, F,',i;
1i4TEi,G(1Vt04MNTAL PEVlMUl
vk-Juu-UU-42'`5 t„TkA C ,_.i t:P TAP,
41-UU i-0s,-'tt 04
VIUse Lf Mf AJU4S St'.if:k
f 11AL INTEk.',W,3N1• ,VTAC R,-4E'a UE
I+NTE,"FUNtt TkANSEE RS
rr1-OJ-,-CU-4 c"Z1 T.tAMt f':k FRIJI S:A lb,
4l-U"'!U-U0-4241 ':_i4D/N0TF PR7CEtOS
4a-U}t,-00-4 41 J04A :i1 IM8`JKt EMEF;TC
41-v�)U-U0--r24u I J-: ST INCUME
41-:1 lU-U`i-4249 41 SLELL ANLtJUS
111-UUJ-U;t-4281) SALE O'- PRFIPE RTT
41-jJ'J-u: 42t'i ':Alit!Li?SS SALE OF ASSETS
41-000-0`x-41.40 GAIN '3•; SAES Of INVtST.
4t-UOC-Jf�-4Z`?5 ;'LVELUPcR CJVTRtSUTi'JV
41-600-U.1-4294 iATEk CLEARIit. >CCOUNT
T.• 1L IN f_kCU:.J fN,,t ,FEK-;
TOIAL WE, L SE E': T,I
-----------------------
VILLAt_F OF NUJf9T PROS?ECT
._STIMATEU REVLNUF KEPORT
ACCOUNTINI; PERIOD U9 ENOIAIG 11311`x4
LYdh-99 Y -T -O Y -T -O CW 40 U`eP t_C+r)
`l JOUT `:STIJMATF ACTUAL ACIUAL IAL %M'
151,OJ0
112,50.`_1
168,79
3,x25
1n,76<J
4"'00")
18, 747
211,.0
16,514
s,�ftlUe_
4, 1>J.000
3, 11 Z, 479
3.31?x962
Z96.I3t1
776,0il-
1,131,000
9`1.244
989,298
109.42E
341,7u2-
501),OU3
314,994
50C', OUO
16-
7,344
E` . 000
1 11, 747UttU-
3.390-
3,390-
35-
I_t5'OOO
1Z3,750
t34,612
15.J7,e
3trs x8M=
2h. U00
1,',747
18,457
3.529
hr5ti i-
�,OUO
3,744
10,OUJ
128,316
UOU
2, OSI,OUO
1,53J. 226
1 ,h52, 367
1Zd.523
vie, 633-
6,2,L.000
4, 6313, L99
5:077s 044
4Z6.893
1.171.9i6 -
PARKING SYSTEM RLVENttE FUND
FIeF PLVEr<!t'_
46-UJO-o)-4113 f', -NTA_ - uEP''T 1.000
Tt1TAL FEE R,-V;_�aJe 11JU0
PARKIN{; RFVLP!!jl
46 -00u -J}-+,211 .% TL1' CULU'Ll I'.1. U'.IF 41 3,r"OJ0
46 -J00 -00-42I ' `, ._fik 6.,000
46-J_'.- J-421 3 ':eP CL �'Cf t 41 LLa ST.LOT� 9, Jul)
46-UU:e-CI'1-'s24i3 F�.T r_,+. ST INLri€SIE 1-',20O
I', T'.0 PARK li-,(; k -V£ 4 is �, JOI)
TUtAi_ ''Al"'IM sY.TEN .1 Vi NUE Itr -l.t 114 OU]
-----------------------------------------
FISK MANIA,'MiJ F-1rst)
INtE-.1-0^t,) tRA"IAF RS
;a`; _ t7'Y' J. t=t'IU 9-1r'�0
R F1R I' tIATtP FUN') 16',,340
k-422 7 "t ANSt FF. F! .Jx+ FR KNC. FLPIu 3.00U
41-u0),-'0{4 't1 E -1;,L 3Y -c <.I«T f, 1, Ul 1, c=3,50 -r1
49-v)0-0)-4�4'. -. cT 14 Ii.JTIOi—, 61.SU0
49-uJu-0"-4243 iT�f,AraY "} T i I_'N 64.103
49-11)0-J0-4.'44 `t`: Xi J±i F' C'JNTk1. 0TlU''S 0'U00
44-UDU-U)3-4265 R��'Ji ',E d{_"_1 ,000
49-;.-<J-0U-4Z4a LPI€.i,,E [.5,000
4Y -00„-•J'-424'4 i.TEt -`.T - AL •500
A ,' 4
'ALANCE :1AL
1F3r7al� 13
loe-
7141,03k'- 19-
34126-
0
25, 0GG- IOG-
30.3*IF - tti-
6.5't3 26
5 WUC 100
C
J
L
34F'133- 19-
.1 7',956-
-.17',956- 1�1-
3,744
2,180
96'l2J
2,
Z,140-
51-
3,744
211,.0
16,514
2,340-
2.840-
57-
-9,9)4
t,O,813
6,75,
1J. t . l-
14, 1�7-
,j, 71,4 794
49, t36
5.680
I80C4-
1 S, 164-
16-
7,344
6,410
100
3.390-
3,390-
35-
7,650
9,857
:.4t7
14r
343-
ZZ -
125'9t3Z
126,216
13.952
41, f8l'-
41.724-
?'-
I Z-1726
128,316
11,452
44,62',-
44 624-
26-
72•!,4,5
759, Ot.8
96'l2J
1'441 t'1LJ-
L24,749
133,072
16,514
31,2E r-
33.26 6-
2t? -
Z 230
Z,40O
SOJ
out;-
47,61”
53,044
-,.315
b-
1'0.41'
16-
50.'SZ5
52,775
1,141
t4s fi'7-
[4,725-
22-
44,375
50,376
1�.Tlk
24,124_
14.124-
ZZ -
4e500
4.442
61T
L.tlSi-1D-
.0,747
13,476
1.365
llr'1�4-
14,024-
44-
41,744
58,732
,2t=!t-LO-
4, 122
5r xGt1-
5.5 ()U-
20u-
VILLA(.t U, MOUNT PROSPECT
ESTI'IATED REVENUE hEPURT
ACCOUNTI-VG PtRTOD 09 E DINS 1/311,+9
19)R -d9 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR i90
WJI)G T ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL
I'TAL iNTEKLU`.4/1,600 1,0711,676 1,139,375 130'('54
Tt)T.%L FIS#. MAV,..;-.N'_;j iUN)j tr417,6J') 1.0?1',.616 1,138,375 13tJVL54
------------------------------------------
CAPITAL 1+4PRV. E �t'T'L. FUN0
TAX 'tCVE'iUf-
51-0U-O'}-•`t Ul6
TAXLS - CURKI IIT
172.30)
129, 212
51-000-00-4017
IgxES - PRI Chi
231.900
179.425
226,862
51-00U-OJ-4i4t1
INTtRi ST 1NCOP+E
I" GUO
,.6,250
5(",259
51 -6O0 -J)-4[62
—E JF EIRE EWIPM& T
6,478
51 -01J -LJ -42`'3
1,LF 3J� P.:t. LQ.IPMFNT
12s001)
9:0OC
21,172
5l-UOU-00-426,
SAI -t: OF PJLICE EOUIPMEAIT
11,000
7.407
51-J00-U'J-4,a7
tLVELOPER D(INATIUM
143,950
1J7,955
106,921
51-000-0{t-4,69
;IISTtWCAL SL',LIETY 00NT',
11,,000
93,744
95.136
PJAL FAX RFV;-lW,
77'-,ISU
5;i2. 093
525,827
ILTA'. CA°ITAL IM,',.V. E REPL. FDNC
------------------------------------------
T7ti,150
5"3"093
525,827
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPfIT CU'iST 1947
oTHER tfVcNU'-.
54-tt')9-Ot?-4243
I=aTEu, ST IN-GMr
4,500
3,375
12.940
fl�TAL OTtiEK
R,fj :JUt-
4,500
3,375
12.840
TuTAL DOWNTjWF4
------------------------------------------
K_I)EVLP'41 COtIST 198T
4*5UO
3.375
12.840
00 AT04f, PFUEVLPMT
CJNST 1985
Fti PLVL,4w,
55-040-UU-4113
.L4TAL INt:0AE
-5,40(7'
6,300
6,500
55-J00-1`1_4$',5
'L I12', 1z S'=ME°iTS
27.440
20,574
55-J')(-0 -:,t4a
IF, TEP ST INC ";9F
30r000
22r 5133.
10.266
55-DOU-O1)-426a
'-1LE lJF PROPERTY
55-110.0-tiU-4267
i�_VEL-II,'EK 1)u.'IATt litS
64.800
T)TAL if,t RIV-.
1.01:
..`^1340
49.314
81.566
TJTrL 031NTC.N
------------------------------------------
`tt (VLIMT CONST Ilk3s
6"',840
49,374
131.566
P w FACILITY LJiol`
i9JIA
UIIIEK .;LVLNU.
Sb-0O(J-OG-4242
5%L"— OF 4t)NDS
56-U0U-0-J-4,.48
3 �iTi__. ST INC+.'..1E
14,500
10,372
15.002
S,w3b
n28
1,J 12
1,431
4.107
7*107
1*526
1.526
1,524
l5U
3,371
4.121
4*121
'J'IK F C - 0
�=-AI ANLi.
2u?,2'f -
2+s ).2Z'.-
17 2, 3, 0-
11,03d-
6.741 -
c,,479
lft+IT2
IJ,UuO-
37,U29-
24si;b5-
25 ), 3Z4-
250,324-
0.340
G. 340
g, 34(l
1,qu0-
27.4'ru-
19,734-
, j?
VAGL °
f,A.LA!,ri- RAL
172s3U0- 1u'J-
11*O�tI- 5-
a:742— �—
e4l2 0
10* 172tis
IG.')UU- LUO-
37,019- 2L-
29,t".4- 24
3- 32-
250, 3t 3- 32-
8.340 185
:3, 34u I95
8.340 185
1,910- 23-
27,440- 100-
19,734- 3t-
U
64,3u0
15,72fi 24
It, 726 24
U
5,32 3
VILLAf.t- If ft0W,l PRUS.'Ef F FA_t3E 0
FSTI IAIFO NEVL.UF- kE'UN.T
ACL0JNTF' G P�_R1( •) r)q ENCJKt; 113[/99
1+- it, -+S't Y -T-^ Y -T -O LU° MO u=.'d �_C°:.
IOGET r7ST1"(ATL ACTUAL ACTUAL r;AL A,J BfiLA\( t- PAL
[.'T,TC ;TtkEK R4 -V EN�tt 14,'�01) ICeR72 151UO2 <. .)
TOTAL kFAC It ITY (-.-Y'(T 1?07n 14t, SO-) 10,172 151002 '•L.' 1
------------------------------------------
P � tACItITY U'IN f irs7si
IY1E-.#-UNI, TRANSFtrcS
57-Uu-a-U)-4227 Ti=3N. 1-tFR UV CIR;t FipaU 4111"lJ0 2941997 400,0'0 C
1-424. 1'"T<_+. ST IW t.tF 4t,045 3±1030 61'843
T-,TAL €NTEKFU',J TF\%',Pt RS I' 11,79`) 17'795 40
44'�r044 ;3110'27 46Lt8v3 2'090o90
1 1, 79t' 111 79R 4
TOTAL ' A FACILITY Lt;ISf 19,A7t- 4v ")"5 333'Ot7 461,843 9'3 161796 17:7vP
SSA ='5 CJi) 1. LAXt Ml.:'1. WATER
TAX HLVEv1JF
It- tk)'WU -SSA k6
170,0=)0
271'497
350.000
_U:ss0-
Lf1'Lt-O-
�-
c4 !;0 1-JU-4,19 TAXES -
CF)R,t' NT
56'„9)0
445,1'59
12,405
56c. 9;)t,-
S6 G, 9l G-
LJ('-
56-u0'1-U•,-110,Ci IAXES -
PR(W�
172,600
SU'. 1450
640,171
3e,4.3-
3Zt4t9-
5-
)(•-4�'tt# I' TER: ST
INC`7MF
3„1')7('
22,50,
241884
_
Z,32H
St 116-
SsI26-
17-
PITAL FAX
1,20`1.500
952'119
665,055
2,321'
h04, 445-
bu't 1445-
49-
I1,3AL SS- :5 011F:,F. _AK,_
MFLN. ,i ATE:,,
lr2r."rrSuJ
952.119
665,055
Z'3Z3
6(}4,4•.5-
6J4'445-
-
tf-------------------------------------------
G�QRGUAL;FIiT C,3 Sr. F')O0
UTHEk 4LVFNUt
59-uJu-Oi±-y[4[ sALE
It- tk)'WU -SSA k6
170,0=)0
271'497
350.000
_U:ss0-
Lf1'Lt-O-
�-
54-GJO-UO-4t4J I T,:!
'T INCOME
2,`100
I:494
12,405
1C, 4I)5
101405
>ZC
TL•fAL 3TNFR St aL(.J,
17?. JJO
279.941
362,405
'+159ti-
tin
71 5-
3 -
TCT At GLOM,( /At d(FT C-t•.,]T'
F+L,,B
3770-0
_'7`3'991
362140=5
v,`9->-
—
--------------------------------------
9'595-
3-
COtP'RATE PUP.PQSF= tr L
1 1'473
TAX , cV Etti.'f-
6u-0J(,-0.1-4t1Iv Ta[ES
- CUk,0';T
�0. 95`i
).51205
7019`1u-
5(j19`. J-
1uC-
6J-u`,jit u -"V20 IARC.
- V'pp,
7",,150
V). 355
15. SU9
1,641-
,641 -P'
P -,V
f' R.: PL FAX
3'300
?,475
3'300
3:3U1
6•)-0011 :e.+-mt't Jf-�'
ST Ih'.'t°"F-
i••'r 1000
7,497
9'2J9
591
Ili-
711-
7-
TF:TAL TAX .t'VE`.Jt-
143'4'JO
1071`:?
68,0-)8
3'-491
55' iu!-
5""rat
1!IT Ai --C LF'sYaft->.�F'S�-@F-i
I19 F3
-c_=----__-
1,A,"OU
`
U, Tr 51?
68'ovc
4'391
'aS'1U2-
>St t2-
�7
i<�-
V1LLAL, - Lit OJUNI PNUSVELI
t=STT-41TO REVFIUE RF -ORT
ACC!)t1NT146 PERIGO 09 E^!Clh,, 1/31%89
1'vst3-d9 Y -T -D 7-T-0 CUR .90
311or, ET E ,TI "!aTc ACTUAI ACI UAL
CUP p0i.AT, PUP, PScS t5 '. 1 1971,
TAX-.f-VE;.fit
61-000-U-!-4022 TAXES
- t'URRINT
93,450
73,083
hl -1)00-0,)-4023 7,,XES
-
117,300
a1. 9T5
111.304
61-UJ(i-W-1-41,64 NSC)'.At PFJ" 8}.PL TAX
',600
41950
6,600
I T L t
ST IMC1,HF
I_), 90(9
14,9'14
17. t1,,Z
F)t AL TAX Rf,VE-+tUL
237,350
179. OU2
136,3,6
TOTAL CUtPOkAT= ,1UPPJ
------------------------------------------
3 L I 19/4
23r.35)
113.002
136,326
SSA 01 P:? Oa P --CT :iF: ADr)H . O G I
TAX PEVEt;UE
6[- CJ -:30-41.22 TAXt5
- CURK) Nl`
11.909
9.919
bZ-.,Ou-UC-4025 T„XES
- P1,104
11,000
9,0UU
11,432
62-3'10-J.;-4Z4c) I,TtI':SF
INCIiPE
2x100
1,575
Z.193
UITAL FAX kr Vc:,t1E
i -.090
19,4`74
14,075
TUTAL SSA 41 PKUSPELT
------------------------------------------
Mr ACIOWS 31 C 1
.,0150
19,494
14,+)25
SSA :2 ILACKHANK i, E I
TAX °tV[`lUF
TAXES
- CUIRt NF
Ls.200
41900
63 -JOU -00-4029 TAXES
- PbfUl
13,400
10.044
13,375
63-000-00-42413 I'!TEIR
ST INCOM£
1,900
1.422
2,112
TOTAL TAX kEV.'%UE
24,500
21,366
15,487
TUTAi. i,A 12. ;iLACntl AVK
------------------------------------------
i E 1
2.1 5]0
21.356
15,437
INSUR.ANCF RtSLPV- '3 E
T
TAX 4cVc"),
FAXt_7
- C')R;+aT
4't 1.:')
32. 1519
T,XE.
- Pi:j-jam
7'), 1 J
5[+569
661891
6o-:1G0-UJ-4cv;� I,TF'.
ST IYLI+mt
5.003
3,144
6,472
TUFAL TAX Ki, V, 0_
118.700
83.632
73,353
T+;TAL L4SJP.A'70f- cS-K'.1:
------------------------------------------
'I E F
11i,ZdO
x6,632
73,353
CUMM!hJILAF1UNS t0u/1PN5tIT
C L I
TAX
67 -000 -Ji; -4051 TAPES
- C`Jf F+ -.YT
67-+j;)U-jt:-403- TIAE`>
- 0Kl.Jt7
..350
17,863
ZZ,7�9
6'60t)
19154
1.754
7.754
20,111
2013
208
758
95,;
95E
UMRLC10
ALA,C_
Iul.U34-
11, 90i1-
It,d-
93
11,975-
1,975-
11.,)75-
11.'?75-
13, ZOC-
zr-
21Z
13,ZU0-
tF-
212
I3.,Ii3-
13,013-
43.1(,:)-
+.219-
1,47='
v4,947-
'v4,it- 7-
1. 122 -
rt::;_ i
bALA CE 0AL
93,450- 100-
51436- 5-
L'
2,l�li- il-
101,J24- 43-
t0l.024- 43-
11,900- TUG-
te9- 1-#
93 4
11.475- 46-
11,97`+- 46-
li:2C0- 1JC-
212 1!
13,013- 46-
13.01)- 46-
43, IC -0- 1'}u-'..
3,219- 5-
14472 29
44.947- 18-
44,447- it', -
i
1,IZ2- ti-
VLLLAt•E (If MOUNT PRL-,V_LT
tSI€"ATFL, REYFP4W RE°F'-RT
ACCOUNrltb PLPIUU =}9 EwOIN, 113if'19
190 .i-89 Y -T -U Y -T -U LU, MU
i')Ut; T F%TtfC.T= at ntat
L L,Mi+.jN1L A TL CIH S c•7.IPMtmr if L I
TAX i:,VEN.J
61-3UU-U;)-4e'4ti €'iTF" ST INC+1ME
224
1.42
1,152
T TIAL 1.1X RE VF WE
Z'r,'375
1'ie )It5
23,880
TUTAL LW*MJNICATi ),S ;ole -ENT _ 6 t
------------------------------------------
2Lr175
19.045
tar 8t,J
U04,NTL)WN RFUcVLR.tT 1+ G 1 19t47U
24C 500
1wt),., 69
TAX isEVLNkh-
INTE6t F'JP40 TRA TSt-.-nS
bft-UUJ-U:;-4U14 .1:63PL.TY TAX TNLREW-T
40a 00'I
-".9vt
ib, 164
68-ut-1 -J';-403`1 SALES TAX INCREMENT
- c W Cri-ST FU;:;
1 b lot)
137,997
FJfAL fAX P:-V=%Ut
40 our)
L9<9',7
36,783
1i.TLKFUN.) I k N 4SFf k
5 ''.994
64.0U0
b9-JQ,i-Jii-4ZZ7
68-C J,t-JL-44-4 T"A',S - P/T CU;iaT i tN7€)
9"000
71,244
95.010
6P-jP,..-Jj-42,tu L,TLt',-ST INCOME
501,
378
451
68- Wa-U0-4249 .ii SCFLLANEtV CJS INCOME
c,.6,0
71 1f2
U9 -J -1—u— Zl. .
TJFAL L.NTERFGt_ 3ti<:u+SFcRS
9"505
11,622
95.45L
D TAI. t),MNTUtlN kfr.ICYLP if ti G I 14tiTU
---__®------------------------------------
l t'it505
iJ1.619
Lj2,234
P ti FAC IL€TY 3 t: I 1`) II,
TAX "LVE'tUE
69-'J'IJ-Je-401'%
TAXIS-CUR3FwT
114! 70('t
IJ4,019
6Y-ODU-U`t-4U0U
TA.X,.S-F`RI
Y
,'si di)0
't*., 350
58,955
I IAL I -AX ri€ V,!,�JL
24C 500
1wt),., 69
56,955
INTE6t F'JP40 TRA TSt-.-nS
64-UvJ-U"-4<i"=
T;•:,1 ",
- c W Cri-ST FU;:;
1 b lot)
137,997
175,t';U
69 -UM -0t'-4276
TRI i S
- 4ATEF Pt)P =O -PH
3).0011
5 ''.994
64.0U0
b9-JQ,i-Jii-4ZZ7
TRA N,
- CITR FL: ,0
71, 7ti0
59,329
62, ZZ4
69-07')-J'.'-4 Z'.#
rRA4S
- b,AI E'.t-OND-.'-QUI P
n, 4?t)
c,.6,0
71 1f2
U9 -J -1—u— Zl. .
Ii,T',P-ST
LRtLf'I"c
21110
180
61406
69 -+1:J -i:: -4Z4' -i
`lSCFLI_ANL+'lf,
LICU'ic
T ft I"IEFF-U
') f4.1+;St
tltS
3 't. 92f1
2.3,160
314,922
ft)TAt. p 4 FACILIFT
------------------------------------------
= .
I V- Ile
511,42)
4,3, 5Z9
373,877
110t,NTJ!TN Rl.L-VLPf•T
3 t,
I 19,11C
INTERF1tNO TRANFSFI-R1
7u-UtW-Li`-iz—
111.4t5
- VT UI ',T 19FIC
24.5JO
22,122
23,6L0
7i!-UJu-US-42vt
I:tT t��ST
INCIMC
2%
18
3
7G-UNU-Uc-424'1
IHK
INCC-E
19.96°
17,968
19,968
4,450
d:^0u
T,T18
899
Z 90
21 "I 5
21.415
2, 95U
7
HALANCt
17d,70C-
.'-,045-
I£its 545-
8,4c4-
16,OU0-
I V, 6-
3 5.1)9m-
2:7,54 3-
a900-
2I—
r,
it, LAP,(F iiAL
`JZ7 411
145- 1-
1`15- I-
17E',,DG- IJ(,-
? I H 4 -w-
J(,-?,845- 5-
181.145- 75-
9, 9ci,- S-
la,cof)0- 20-
tG-
1, 178- 20-
r1, - 'b .)4
t5,99 _'- ic-
217,ti43- 37-
5. 9c0- 1G-
17
PUL1Lt PINSION HINP
TAY RFVCJL)L
v iLLA,L tit
"J-41 fYRUS,'tLI
:-.<�,.
..s
%STI"ATFL)
REVL-AUL ntS'ORT
71-'J-)0,-4U4i
Tt KtS
ACCOUNTlof,
PFRIT)O
U9 FM)IN!, 11311'19
L
lt-U')U-u^-%243 Fire -m N'S (=r TRiF,JTIOAS
1Ou. 0011-
1911d—d9
Y—T—O
Y-1-0 CUR XO
(AXLS
- PRIOR
2.000
i t0!;ET
L�TI MATE
ALTUAL tCTUAL
f:AL 4' Cr
•.,ALANCL
!AL
T%T+sL INTEKFO1, 11,
P RSOIAL
23.0)3 2."157
.}2:'—
z,. 9t 2—
?0-
i t'TAt_ 4TC,414 k` -+:t VU' 'T 3 E I 1967L ..'',525
22.14V
73.6„3 2,957
.'��=2-
5.3;`1-
-
20------------------------------------------
PUL1Lt PINSION HINP
TAY RFVCJL)L
0
72 -J00 -J9 -4u,3 TAXLS-Pki�J:
71-'J-)0,-4U4i
Tt KtS
- CURk+NI
IU -),000
7x.997
L
lt-U')U-u^-%243 Fire -m N'S (=r TRiF,JTIOAS
1Ou. 0011-
100.1100-
100-
7t -'J+)0-00-4050
(AXLS
- PRIOR
2.000
1.4`44
56.71'+
956,250
`,4,71
54.710
736
ft -00-01-9664
P RSOIAL
PPUP RFPL TAX
It.U00
d. 244
10
11,')'1..)-
11,00C-
100-
71-. JJ -%)',-i 743
',,Lll:
Mt NS LIMJI, TBUT IONS
t9/x000
144.0U(t
157.116
14,"It
34, f, 111-
34,892-
l8-
71 -000 -UO -4z4 i
I4Jt' LST
INLON&
1.11 ).000'
332, 566
919,556
103,445
2y0. 49'r
290.444-
26-
71-Ji)')-U'i-42 i9
:)THER
SSA 03 'tUS'E-alLtt_ '-_ L I
10
10
l0
0
71-0dC-U'-4,40
SHIN +.i.':
SAL% OF INVESTMT
I JIA1 (A.X ,;c
V(."Ut
1,053
1,41-,00)
I.,Oc 1, 235
1.033,460
1IF39
. 1
381. 500-
3i?1 .6L C-
C
27-
7%IAl VILICL P„'S1JS
F010
1,41`,000
1,Ot1,Z35
1.033,400
1111,391
381.6;0-
181.6%0-
17-`
FIPENENPUNSIO” RAe,)
TAX
7r-Jug)-ta'-40'1, TaXcS - CORitr'4T
0
72 -J00 -J9 -4u,3 TAXLS-Pki�J:
_
L
lt-U')U-u^-%243 Fire -m N'S (=r TRiF,JTIOAS
19"1.501)
145,125
153,245
11,769-
4J,r'•',`
4,
Z1-
72-W;)L-t)J-4248 IP 1,T INC{,4F
1, 77-,.00
956,250
952,691
119.778
322,30 D-
r2{S-
32 Z, 309-
2�-
71-uUJ-;,0-4049 F
10
10
1L
0
1-j9-019-42'40 -UV-42'40 GAIN _.,3 S;,LF PF INVtSTNT
10,000
lU,'JL'-`s
10.0000
P;TAL TAX :4, V10)t
1, 4'�N, 50')
1,101.375
1.115,946
1C3,009
3?2.55:-
352.514-
t4-
TOTAL F1-LAc 'S "r'JS11'4 F3J10
------------------------------------------
1,41,",500
1,1=)1,375
1,115,946
10a,i,09
35',5
SSA 03 'tUS'E-alLtt_ '-_ L I
14)( FLVtr f,.
86-0, ,-UJ-'+.n-% TAX'S - t41Rt [17
i .415
1,053
1+4:5-
1,41 `t-
11,1)-:.
fl-d"J-f:�.i-40'3 TArES - Pklft.'
,45,1
1.936
2,451)
P" -34'0-U-42',5 1-7T_::;ST INC74F
740
t'"J
21'1)
7
2U_
2G_
L
^-
TP7AL IAA .ildr;:U=
,x101
i:069
2,b7U
7
1,435-
1,415-
3,;_
TUf AL ., .,.. s •101', r.-NlL'._' 1� L I
---------------------------------------
+.105
3,ur,9
2.670
T
_,415-
1,435-
iE_
SSA ;14 z)J) .Sc-,t1_L. , L I
TAX 4Vf.JUI
89-Jt'J-U,-9019 TAXES - CUR.,: N7 E4tU 630
99-u,l„ 01-4utJ TAXPi - Pr.T3:+ ,321' 3.967 5.C-,16
d40-
Z24-
P40- I00-
2,'4- 11-
VILLA+.L 'F MOL,N€ PRO -'L( T
ESTIMATED €;FVI-I,UL XEPN#T
ACC`MMTI`1G PSKIC'0 07 N1Gth'; 1/31/14
lt91:-_tU Y -T -C Y -T -U CUR N0
i.IUG=T F TINAIF Ar T€IAI ,rii,,
SSA 4, W€ ',E -WILL I
TAX , c'400,:
34-J,,i,-'i 1-424.1 Tr,TF_,;-ST INCnmF
6,15
°166
6rC
T.;IAL TAR KEVl- 1=1,_
6,78'1
SrOb5
5, 76t
I IT AL 2 A "4 1.0 3',_-kl#_I ,- E 1
------------------------------------------
6, Tds
5.035
5,76E
SSA JS LA:t[ MiCML•4R ',JArFR TIC
T A,{ F tV—: J?:
Ta KFC - CUlt+t€ ,, t' TILI
78, 700
741 OZS
JC, -4621 TAXES - PKIJV '1(.1
147r10i)
111,825
tw1,670
42-')(;U-0')-4148 I JuK:.Sr IWIIMF PC[
1", J00
T,447
11,370
J-47511 1 Jiz✓ ST €Ntf'F�E F#I'c
3r,510
L_i.125
28,7,1
1€)T AL TAX r 1 V- ,'9E
"300
221,412
161, 7.1
T1€Tt,L SSA v5 LAS 411,IL,Afi 'kaTFR ',E1
------------------------------------------
?'+.,3011
>''1,472
161,7.1
SSA :!€s t,: :JK61/AL,LRT i !
TAX z,mVEfIU€-
44-J:7u-Ii+.-4v€ r Tw K,'% - LU't Ktt.T
J7. 6„0
16,350
44 -UVJ -)G-4020 TAX,_`--PRI05
T"FA, TAX I"_V£1.Ut
IrtE00
L8.350
14TFRFUNtt TF0.FTSEIaS
4t -J:)0-013-4214 TRAI€SFFK-CUk'4ST F(W)
L".:920
11.612
24,364
84-00,1-0 -444,3 1E'Tc2• ST INC -'AE
114
'J4-J'J �-6J-414`1 J4LK ; NCJ'SE
€,417
111,612
25.455
TIJI AL SQA 4'b 1-iJ (.F/AL IRT
------------------------------------------
.^20
46.`ItZ
25,455
PLiJUU LLAN C L I
111TP,,EOND f`,,VISF:.-t�
45-a")4-0)-42'7 row):E R G%Ni riAL FUN[
'0, 1Z5
311747
.3,725
T+IAL '! 1" rS, "-I
43,72 •i
.', 137
43, 1.'.5
IOTA'- FLi ),t i'€A., , 1. l
------------------------------------------
4,,12
J2,r9T
43,72
TFITAL ALL FLIMS
604
3,€76
3*78U
3,7RJ
Z4, 32;) r 7.'+J 24.44',, 74 4
25,N0,018 1.137,62/
f40 L'i
ti.L Atil t=
46,700-
ts230-
d,ud
4-
11 1."-)9-
17, 3u('-
37, Tfjo-
It,31'.,476-
NAL 44C Z- '`1L
`?6.700- 100-
7,230- 5-
1,070 11
6, 7 19- 23-
3,5'1
-
3r5't I- 31-
113 1 il19-
1-
113,=,'14- J3-
37,109- Too -
C.
37,810- 110-
r56- �-
174 0
1,411 0
€,135 5
f-5- —3-
i
i1,17S,476-
47-
VILLALF 03 MOU:Vf PkUSPE,T
KUUGET FXPFNS- REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD 09 FNOING 1/31!89
1998-89 Y -T -O Y -r -D CUR MO
nU OGEI FSTIMATt ACTUA+ Af nlet
PUBLIL REPRESENTATION UIVISLUN
1, 750
3.750
24
MAYOR ANO BOARO OF TRUSTEES
.,436
E, - it,
22
TOTAL PERS'JNAL S`RVICES
IF,OU0
11,250
11,250
MAL CONTRACTUAL SERVIC`S
3v, TOO
23,004
Z39 8n4
TOTAL CLAMODiTIFS
3.000
2,241
2,428
TOTAL MAYUR AND P'IARO OF TRUSTEES
4+,700
36,495
37,942
AOVISURY Bn ARO; AN(1 ( UMMTSSIO,S
3.407
3,487
36
TOTAL CUNTRAL rUAL SERVICFS
3,925
2,925
531
TOTAL COMMODITIES
150
L08
57
TOTAL AUVIS',RY s'i ARDS AND CO`AISSI
4,075
3,033
538
TOTAL PUBLIC REPREStNTATIuN DIVISION
------------------------------------------
52,TT5
39.528
38.530
VILLAGE MANAGER -b, OFFICE
750
750
1 J
AUMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT
1.936
1.936
20
TOTAL PLRSONAL StRVICES
1411,7OO
112,239
109.413
TOTAL CUYTRACTUAL SERVICES
T,850
5,877
6.010
TOTAL COMMOUI LIES
1.000
747
928
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITURSS
750
558
19
TOTAL OE'3T SERVICt EXP=NSE
7,680
7.254
79744
TUTAL AOMI`3ISTRATION AND ;UPPORT
16",9;10
126,675
124.095
LESAL SERVICES
6,110
6,109
15
TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL SERVICES
15n,600
114,997
131.792
TOTAL LEGAL SEkVICFS
16i3OUO
119#997
131,792
PERSONNEL MA'IAGE-HENT L TRAINING
74,203
79,2OZ
21
TOTAL PERSONAL S'RVICES
15.150
12,105
13,010
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SLRVICSS
23,250
17,338
ZU.292
TOTAL COMMOUITIES
250
190
239
TOTAL Pt'i SONNEL MANACLMENt L TRAIN
39.650
Z9.673
33.541
SALARY ADMINISTRATLOV
414
4114
10
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
46,666
27
313
TOTAL SALAFY AUMINTSTRATInN
46:866
27
38
TOTAL VILLAGE MAFAGE4'S -WFICL
-----------------------------------------
3(.1.630
276,372
269,428
CABLc TV JPtRATIOIJS
CA8LE TV LPERATIU,iS
TOTAL Pl SU`3AL 3r1iVICES
oZ.745
47,034
46.931
TUTAL CONTRA -)UAL S!R VICrS
21#5d5
16,173
17,817
TOTAL CUMMOUfri ES
13.220
4,909
8,007
TOTAL CAPITAL VXPLNOITURES
X3,000
17,244
1.413
TOTAL DEBT SFRVIt.`. EXPFNSF
2,420
1#809
1.936
TOTAL CAiL' TV 'jPFRATi Uri',
122.970
92,169
76,104
TUTAL-CA`3LF-TV -OPLRAT1ONS-_--------------
121.
92,169
76,1U4
PAC, 11
UNtXPtNUE9 u 1 El4t.UM T
`IAL Al Ci E'. CL'r: CAF R F n BALANCE -3AL
1.250
1, 750
3.750
24
49
.,436
E, - it,
22
135
L72
172
6
1,134
10,75G
10,7'58
22
75
t. 394
-1.394
86
T?
93
62
75
3.407
3,487
36
1,509
14,245
149245
27
9,483
40,297
40.247
274
531
L.640
1.84C
23'
20l
72
72
7
750
750
1 J
968
1.936
1.936
20
11.183
44.8'.15
44, 8 R 5
27
11,123
28,208
Z8,2U8
l8
11.123
23, Z 0n
28.ZOd
19
1,301
3.140
1,140
19
1,532
2,959
2,959
13
3
11
11
4
2,836
6,110
6,109
15
0
C
259142
74,203
79,2OZ
21
4.730
15,414
15.814
25
I,U55
3.7693
3.768
17
313
5.213
5,213
39
362
21.587
21.547
74
242
414
4114
10
6,702
46,666
46.8,5
313
6,702
46:866
4608b6
38
FINANCF DEPARTMENT
ADMINISTRATION AND iUPPURT
TOTAL PERSONAL S'QVif t7
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL COMAODITItS
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENUITURFS
I,fTAL OE -AT SERVI tXPt-4.iE
TOTAL AUMI'41STRATION AND SUPPORT
ACCOUNTING
TOTAL PLRSOMAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL CUM:AOJITIES
TOTAL AC£OU?:TING
PURCHASING
TOTAL PER,.ONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVIL-S
TuTAL COMMODITIES
TOTAL PURCHASING
ELFCTRU,41C DATA PROCESSING
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
TOTAL CUMMUOITIES
TOTAL VEST SERVICE EXPFNSE
TOTAL ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING
DUPLILATING SERVICFS
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL 3L-RVICES
TOTAL COMNUJiTIES
TOTAL DUPLi£ATIv4 StRVILES
TELEPHONE SERVICE
TOTAL PERSONAL Si KVICES
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SEE.VTCES
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPE1'IJITlJRFS
TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE
14SURANLE
TOTAL PLRIANA1_ SERVICES
TOTAL OE^T SGi;VICc EXP`NSE
TOTAL INSORAtiCt
CUSTUMFK SERVICES
TOTAL PERy13'4AL SERYICES
TJTAL CO,ti TRA,TU.L SERVICFS
TOTAL COMMUOITI.5
T7T,L CUSTOMER ) RVICE,
LASH MAAArEMFNT
TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES
TOTAL CASH MANA.,f MENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BUOGFT EXPE_NS, REPORT
ACCOUNTING PERIOD U9 ENDING 1/3L/89
1993-d4 Y -T -U Y -I -D CUP 40
BUMET ESTIMATt ALTUAL ACTUAL
PAGE 12
UNLXPENUEU UNENCUM t
BAL ANCA_ ENCU4BERLU BALANCE SAL
77x350
54,931
56,659
3,528
1b•S92
160,142
23
23.600
17.667
16,076
10790
7024
79524
32
4,250
3,171
5, OL5
72-
705-
765-
18-
31000
Zt250
1.448
1.532
1,332
51
27,280
20,457
21,824
2,726
57456
5.456
20
131.460
99,532
101,041
7,974
30.439
30,434
23
7 ,575
14,664
77,293
15,930
22,292
22,292
22
',500
11872
1,809
ZOO
e,91
691
28
500
3i9
456
't4
44
9
1W 575
15,905
79,548
7,130
13,i;27
230J27
211
29,500
21.375
2,139
741
Zt,3bl
2.0,361
92
750
558
750
710
EOU
11750
1.296
853
590
897
897
51
31,000
113,229
2.992
1,331.
28,008
28,U09
90
77,650
58.221
57,114
5.829
2Ut536
20,536
26
70000
5,Z47
3,730
307
3,271
1,270
41
4,750
3.555
5,750
629
1.000-
1,000-
?1-
11,780
13.329
14,224
1,77d
i ,556
T*356
ZO
107,180
d0, 352
80,818
89743
26r3o3
116, 3.2
LS
ZO, 0130
14.994
IZ,038
19772
7,962
7,762
40
T,000
5.247
6,051
648
949
949
14
27.000
ZO,Z41
18,089
21420
8,911
81,411
33
1,,.000
11,997
14,777
1,40u
1, 22 3
19Z23
E
4Z.5UF1
31,869
30,548
39844
11,152
11195<'
2d
X1500
4,122
4,815
665
bill
12
54:000
47. 938
50,140
59244
13,860
131860
22
2`+,290
18,954
20,428
2,054
°r, 862
49862
19
404,000
302, 994
323,200
40,'i0U
BC, 800
90.6UU
20
42'1,270
32 1, 94 9
343,6<8
42,454
115, 6o2
85, hb2
ZC
oF1,450
51,319
5x,872
5,915
12,578
i21578
LR
Z4, 000
L7.941
21.428
d,C'70
L, 57Z
21572
11
6.300
4,707
1.690
41611
4,610
73
47,751)
74,016
16,990
13,985
11,7151
191160
LO
14,'115
141922
19,3Z2
1x473
591
`=93
L1,919
14,7Z2
19,322
1"471
594
593
3
. ilt+t i, [. its .1U"Ji Yttli �i`fi. i
P.(ID'�ET EXPFt,SG t+t�PORT
ACC`IUNTI.it: P14IL"U 07 EVCINu I/3r,tti4
Y- 1-D Y-1 -V CU" .+0
T EITI`t ATk AC TO At �f Ittl/
Fit4A`JCt ')LPAkTMEP#T
12,5JG
II.l'00
LJU
>yU,t-II-.PAR14LiTAL ,XPFEA)ITUPLS
C
Tt'TAL CON TV At I I I A L SERVICE S
12.5.30
?, 379
Z�
TOTAL OEt3T SFkVIC;: LXPftJSE
43,725
32.7117
43,725
TOTAL `t J`,-;'E:'AtlTM-ITAL r_XPEN'.1IFUR
E 56,125
4Z, 156
43,725
TOTAL FI`IANL' JEPAPI"91.11
------------------------------------------
1,U51.415
903,299
818,293
VILLAGE CLERKS IFFICE
1,454-
1,454-
58-
AUMINISTRATIJN ASHU St)PPURT
9611
968
LO
TOTAL REPSDVAL SIRVICEi
5516511
41,715
40,192
MI AL CUNTRA::TUAL SERVILES
341950
26,937
26012
TOTAL CUA MUUIIItS
.',500
L,872
3,954
TOTAL DL3T SfRVIC,_ EXPENSE
4,8',0
3,627
3,87[
TJTNL AO W STRATTON AND SUPPORT
98,940
74,151
74,730
VILLAGE NE''"ISLLTTEK
364,795
304,79,
27
FATAL CU"fRACTUAL SLRVIL`S
3'1,250
22,630
20,165
TOTAL CUMMODITIfS
2,500
1,872
657
TOTAL VILLAGE. N-kSLrTTEk
3',750
24,552
20*822
TOTAL VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
-----------------------------------------
I.)I s6)0
+6,703
95,552
RISK MANAGEMENT
Z,95G
2i9z,t)
44
DISK MANAGEMENT PW) KAM
59-
TOTAL CUiTRALTUAL StRVJCTS
1,33',,140
1,JU4.841
975,045
TOTAL kISK MANA.,4MfNT PRJ,i�A-
1:33:,840
1,004,841
975,01;5
TOTAL RISK MANAG+='IENT
---------------------------------------
1,339,840
1,0U4,841
975,045
INSPECTION SERVICE`,
31,110
i1, 710
26
INSPECTION SERVICr=S
L-71#
1,074
20
TOTAL PLtS!.INAL �tRVICES
32.,.435
240,345
235,423
IUTAL CONTRA':1`11AL SLRVICES
3?,830
24,579
22,516
TOTAL C1,MM0011 ILS
6,75+0
5,040
3,800
TOTAL. CAPITAL FXPE'OITURFS
1,000
747
1,585
T t,T d'_ DE:iT S,PVICL LYRE,SE
,6Lt}
19f9ta2
21,296
T AAL INSP<LTii)-�1 itRVICES
38'.705
29J.673
284:63U
cP1;; It1Lc:RIl,+; SE^L'IC-.S
IUTAL 9t!'SIP;3L Y-PViCES
29'!.0?0
171,205
189,110
TL,TAL CL'vTRAI TOttt ',=RVICrS
121,700
91,242
89,990
I'OfAt CCI$'�nJTTIL',
4,250
3,933
4,176
TOTAL CAPITAL EXPEVUIItikl-S
I,JOO
747
419
luTAL DtL T S;=RVV�L LXPT ,St
11 1940
12,699
13,552
TUI.t#_ a N-.i^.c l: t'.t; S-RVICE-r
39`,911
299,826
297.247
TLTAL INSDFCTIO'£
------------------------------------------
73716L5
590,499
561.927
t` A G' i'
t)n+_-AP-'JEC UNL"f LA
bALAVLE Er1C+J'it;r-RL#1 BALANCE 71 AL
12,5JG
II.l'00
LJU
C
12."UU
12, t'0£:
Z�
90.754
2+9:124
24),112
13
3,931
15,458
15.45P.
25
983
9,238
9,131+
26
342
1,454-
1,454-
58-
48i
9611
968
LO
5,740
24.210
24,210
24
10,065
10,055
1,143
1,'43
14
11,923
11,928
3;,
51740
36,131
3o, 131,
27
52,162
364,795
304,79,
27
SZ.862
364179`
364,795
27
52.862
364,795
364,741
27
239!379
659112
65,112
27
1.849
10,224
10,224
31
202
Z,95G
2i9z,t)
44
59-
2.1.62
5f 3:24
5,324
ZC
21.792
1t, 3.025
t03,025
27
19,459
65,911
6°1,910
26
55.`81
31,110
i1, 710
26
173
L-71#
1,074
20
581
5f•1
55
1,694
31 s38
1,306
20
77.204
It, 2, 1.64
102,663
2+5
104,996
205, 5F 4
205.:5.+'5
to
VILLAut €IF MOUNT PRUS"ECT
t'.000ET FXPENSt_ REPU:IT
ACLIJ(JNTI�I, P[RIU0 G9 FUU1Mi 1131139
L J,3.; -s9 Y -T -O Y -T -O LUX MG
,3.)OGET L - '.TI MA TL ACTUAL ACTUAL
PULICL OF?ARTMLNT
131.942
137, J4c
it
AJMINISTRAT Intl AND SUPQURT
43,7;x3
43, 753
rl
TUTAL PLK-'X.AL SERVICLS
42>:025
319,464
2x38.02;3
TLIT AL CUPTRALTUAL SkRYtCES
1.7, 580
80.649
63.817
TOTAL C1)M,MOUITI ES
`x.950
7,710
1,501
TOTAL CAPITAL EXoEN1111UKFS
7.UJ0
1,494
622
Till AL DEI',T SC.?VICt EXPENSE
2<<, 200
i6, 144
19t 360
TJTAL AOMIA, iTRAT €JA AIIU SUPVOR1
50"65.
427,131
379,383
PATROL ANO T"FFIL FtiF>?RCEMLNT
7, lie
7,PPt
18
TUTAL PLR�OAAL S�RVIt ES
2123i,430
11675.1,71
1,743,137
TJTAL CUNTRACTUAL St.;(VlCf'S
51700
5,813
1.547
TOTAL CUM:HU7€TItl
44#650
33,`+53
36.759
TJTAL UEsT SF:VSrc cAPF�1SE
I+-r,83U
116,154
123.904
T')TAL ."aTR1L A*) TRAFFIC ENFORCtML.:,45'-7LO
1,238
1,829,691
1,905,407
Ck€t4C PRtV., PUoLI(: ANO YOUTH SERV.
966
905
10
TOTAL PERSINAL S4RVICCv,
17.915
T3.413
7t7.446
IuTAL CC.4TRACIUAL SERVICES
),5UU
T,11U
3,671
LOT 4L CU>IH'JUI TtFS
4,600
3,43P
3.302
T;;TAL UEOT SEjVIC, EXPENSE
1„940
3, 6Z7
3,871
TOTAL CRIME OkEV., PUBLIC AND YOUT
I1`„8'15
OT, 59P
89.351
I,4VESTIGATTVF. 4.40 JUVFE,IIt PRLGRAM
^7,732
87,7'2
23
T`JAL P6<-Y44L SF2VIC�S
-45?,635
254,429
271,675
ICTAL CONTRACTUAL SE VtCtS
=.,10-�
4,5b3
J.71I
TOTAL Cl3IiMJ'3TTIFS
i:ltt0
1,816
4,589
TJTAL 0017 �LAViC _. EXPf-IiSE
L?,
14,517
15,488
TOTAL 114V,-STICATIVF A.4r JUV� MILE P
3.1#IvS
247,3Z5
295.463
CROSSING GUARU.S
29.176
29,170
26
TUTAL Pt'l-'0NAL StfWICES
`,SCf'a
37,872
31,470
TOTAL CUMNJOITTLS
5Ut1
369
154
TUT 3L CKOSSI'TG -UARUS
'I,JUO
313,241
31,6 4
FUUIPMFryT MAINTF'!A'ICE C OPFRATTONa
TJTAL PtetS.-?NtL SFRVICCS
42,145
31,599
32,647
TOTAL ClYllRA'-TUAL SLRVICFS
.?,109
46,557
41.387
TOTAL CUMi3J0I f I E-`,
I I I , OGU
93, 241
81.8",4
FuTAL CAPITAL fXVINk ITUkcS,S,9J0
65,L69
22,535
TUTAL '_JUIT'M�4T 114INTE'IANCF F, OPER
'.')11145
ZZf, 557
178,3`.3
TUTAL 2IJL€Ct Ot PM1i TW— T-,JSi•560 Z'f-9".S33 2,879,621
------------------------------------------
rAU- 14
UNEXP_1YSEt U`lENCUM ,
SAL ANC tl1C: AeFk�-U "ALA'3f t 'SAL
27,237
131.942
137, J4c
it
6:33
43,7;x3
43, 753
rl
11277
2..344
Z, 349
24
117
1,37P
1,374
69
2,420
193,922
4,4,0
20
37.034
190.272
190,272
35
175,160
49G. 293
.9U.29k
lI
2
x,153
51.IS3
77
,,179
7, lie
7,PPt
18
t 5.4€3”
30.976
30,`:76
20
196.029
'134.301
X34,'lli
2Z
7,575
19,469
19,469
20
793
..h JO
5.824
61
147
1,238
1,233
27
484
966
905
10
8,990
Z7,5U5
27. i( 4
24
27,547
lu, 940
80.960
23
186
1, 30.0
2, 3E'9
39
SIL
511
LU
1,930
3.872
i, 87?
2r
24.669
^7,732
87,7'2
23
1,656
19.03U
19,030
36
346
346
69
4.65b
19, 3It,
19,316
38
3,403
9,198
9.458
13
1.620
2),714
20.713
33
11,925
29.176
29,170
26
'>�•, 365
6+ W7
74
16,944
IZ3.7i3
123,75?
41
Z9I,385
982.941
#82,954
25
FIkE F LALK(AALY VP')T=CIIUPI F)EPT,
AGMIAISTRAI €+JN ANJ iUPPURT
TOTAL Pts: 's -1"!1,L StKVIL,S
ZI-_,t5u3
2'J7,333
193,922
17,870
°c:�;.,�
62,`'c3 iG
TatT,=L Ct7`:TVA_FUAL 'S •. PVILES1.700
38,745
21,576
4,'i 94
3P,C2=t
3G,124 58
Tx,TAt_ CL-MnUCI TILS
7l:.3ti0
i'Jt755
21,377
7,120
4,"T3
4,`,73 l9
TOTAL CAPITAL EXP, �,OITUR 3
1 160
11,052
111486
2,237
t.'�1.,
3.274 22
T -T AL OEeT V LVF , EtPF,,,t
,1. 100
9,072
91f90
1,210
'.420
1.420 20
(!)'AL + 0!''1 A°") �,UP:'URI
,,;,,415
1,15,957
259,042
33,331
LL 1.374
12 i, 374 3,
VILLA4,F OF MOUNT PROSPECT
:WoUET LYPENSL RSPURT
ACCnUNTIt,;; PtRl:311 09 FYOING 1131749
19113-69 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR ric
,1JOGET =STTMATE ALTUAL ACf UAL
F lv;E L TMEP'G'-rW_Y PROTcL IION "EPI.
_79.63<
31 �4
1*.65
t I"t JFPARTMENT JP`-,'?oIIL'JS
931 3
993
,',253
TOf AL PERS--i4A!_ S=RVICLS
.It42i.7311
1.816.227
1x1351,099
T.,T.L rWJRAf TUAL '--VI Lf S
[,- * 50-)
21,366
Z7, 519
TOTAL CUMnOUITT ES
12#100
9.012
9,847
T'iT At CAP II AL LAM 'IIT TURLS
2, 320
46x728
39.140
TOTAL OE-1T S`�,VA:t cXeL,3SL
145,200
1G8,900
116.160
I UT AL i-I,E :-PA tI Mf NT 't P,:e AI JNS
2r 661,, 9'�0
2, 002, ZS
2#043,7„5
Ct)f;t ENFOFLFMZWT
I'J,-?Jr,
10,)3h
32
TJTAL PEKSOVAL SERVICES
12,778
12.778
2z
TUTAL CONTRALTUAL SERVICES
3.572
3072
LS
It1TAL CUi4;10uITIE%
10,341
30.341
24
TOTAL CIME ENPOtLEMtNT
14,2112
1%,292
5
FIRE YI.LVENTIJ14
12.166
12.468
2L
TJTAL PfkiWNAL S;,tVICL'
lilt735133,272
54,451
128.094
TOTAL CMTK A.IUAL 3-R VI CES
9,081)
6.786
5,709
TOTAL COMP0DITIES
4,3"0
3,)401
4.114
101 AL CAPITAL fXPL' 4 )t TURzS
670
495
607
T IAL LE-r'I SEAVV L FXPLfSE
12,100
9,072
9.t80
TOf 3L Fi'L PR -V. N119'1
2'.3,935
152.865
t48, 20
COMMUNIL.ATI UaS
fi7',. 1 56
7v, 1 4.,
23
TJTAL CUOIRAC IUAL S-KVICtS
c7,150
20.149
21,139
T;)TAL CAPITAL tXPL"011UR-S
tr85,)
51 13 IT
11925
TUTAL
)4,000
25,479
23.064
cpU1PMLNT '4AI4IENANC,- & 0PERATI(JNS
TUTAL PER 1,JAAL StRV ICL%
..x635
41.119
46,057
TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SceVICES
19,9iJ
14,211
15.378
TUTAL CUHM)JI TI'-S
44.000
32,994
33,659
TUTAL CAPITAL cXPENU111IRLS
242.5)0
141,890
227.238
TUTAL OEOT SERVICt: EXPI NSE
S. .840
48,627
51.872
TUTAL t-.�-.;1P,1-NT MAINTENANLE E ')PER
4,+,155
3L 1, 740
374, ZL;4
ENf-M,c.YCY PREPAKEU'Uz:-
TUTAL PERSONAL S'-3VICPS
1,24(1
2,430
2.317
T-I%L CU`d TRALTUAL StRVIC-S
5,;450
2#8)t7
2, 4U9
TJTAL CUMN3UITIzS
990
738
120
TUTAL CAPITAL EXPF`,:ITURES
'•,200
4.644
4,363
TJI At -M_.t(=_P:CY t'iFPA ki: UN-SS
1'',.1S:i
1),692
9, 2U9
TL,TAt- I-1';L L t`L.' i,3UTELTL' t! EcP1.
------------------------------------------
:73.,,t,35
-2,749,126
?,R9-fre40,7
CLNUPAL DISPAILH SEriVIC,
PULICF L FUR .= 3I3P«€f'f SFRVIC-S
T'JIAL CU-,.TRr,-TiJAL S" 2Vi L`-::
353,050
264,780
264,754
TOTAL 9,,LIC_ L fl;iE 01SPAf Cit SE':Vl
3' 1,050
264,780
264,754
TOTAL CUfTR..L DISPATC 1 SklcVllf=
------------------------------------------
351, 05n
2.4#78O
2b4,754
PAE. I5'
Uf.EdPS;OE0 UNF#1LUN }:
•3AI-A'.CE ENCOMPFR-0 W+LANCL SAL
184.427
_79.63<
31 �4
1*.65
'3-;i
931 3
993
,',253
2.253 19
4*554
23,1:1]
23,1v0 37
14.520
29.040
2 9. 04 'd 2C
LOr .', 64
61h, Off.
t:26,OC" 23
13,782
-0, 641
49,641
215
183
3, 371
1.311
37 '
290
136
236
5
c3
63
1.210
1.4.:0
2,420
ZC
15,665
5'„731
t�, 731
Z7
2.336
„ni l
t+.Ul l
22
950
4,`125
4,425
12
3,286
I'J,-?Jr,
10,)3h
32
4.514
12,778
12.778
2z
3.38t)
3.572
3072
LS
3.414
10,341
30.341
24
5.U07
14,2112
1%,292
5
5,484
12.166
12.468
2L
Z2s799
4,'f%1
54,451
11
_'.31
9,3
923
211
433
L,442
1,441
37
?375
770
8C'
1,837
t1837
30 `
664
..071
5:071
3t,
281 ,909
fi7',. 1 56
7v, 1 4.,
23
29,417
91, 6
88,29b
25
249411
at'. 6
8:1, 29h
�5
29*411
8i,?Ivo
511,296
25
VILLA(,L Ut P11)UNF PROSPELT
t`.UD.,ET E--Xf'ENS` r€tPutT
: tc(:0!NTTItS PtfzV'0 09 -401(4,., 1f 3.I:i9
1':1-99 Y -T -O Y -T -U CUR .NC
<;'.)0;ET ES TI NH TE A'Tt1AL ACTUAL
HUMAN SERVICCI, DTVIII°'r
:'>„ 711
Z1, 111
._
LeJF-•SR,iAFI U:, R_FL R_"AL, :i £,?U"IS EL I'dc:
�:� Fr'
2x074
26
T,lf AL PF'S,WIAl S`=F.V 1C S
7`.155
55.575
52.444
TOTAL C€ ,FKA-TUAL SLLVtLt"S
1,200
7,632
7,5e,2
T'iT°,L Cu"mo.,)I FILS
.30n
2,457
3, 1t5
ToT At CAt' IFAL E. XP L ti,= I TOk i. S
1.290
400
R56
TOTAL F)LI Sihl<VICL EXPt'iSE
`x.630
T,Z54
7x744
I.1 T,',L INF':Jt".A TIi'i: .t' Fr Rk AL, L C'IL'
`x9,535
73,8th
t1s 731
RtLREATIJN ANU -JUCATIU_i
3, V-5
3.395
l00
TUTAL PE.t SINAL SERVICES
11.555
8.658
9.9,'7
Tt,IAL CU:IfRA`_TUAC SLRVICFS
1.650
1.233
1x931
TOTAL CA'ITAL LXFt NUIlURcS
1.395
2,53R
42
T 3TAL RE-,(Iuj IOy AND CV4C AT104
1`'e 600
12.429
11.753
HLi�tt'�U. V4D SERVIC: S
L.:, �!9`,
10,;395
37
J,tTAL PtkSJi1AL SE RVICf
40,425
30.3:)3
33,576
TOTAL CU -I FRAC ILIAL S`_u.VICES
13,750
14.058
10,911
Tilt IL HOf Ei,U€i+UU SW4VICcS
5"'.175
.4,3bl
44.437
COMM NNITY ACTLVIIIF`.
240
24U
25
1,;TAL PEFSIVAL Si f<VICES
2`,x515
22,248
18,780
F•,TAL CUNTRA':TOAL SLRVECLS
l,'S0
945
1,137
FUT1L CJI-IM)NITY A�TLVITIE
St .`)IS
23, I93
19,9L7
L'LUOD 110NUR 1'R-);RA.3
39.9f1`
34.904
32
TUTAL F'L, S.JNAL �E4VJCIS
1.345
1,317
1,382
TGTAL CUNTk A":TUAL S,RVICES
960
72(1
7211
TOTAL CUM!V)O1rLLS
1,450
1,080
707
TOT '.L '1Li1.1, ULINUR Pk't{;u Ary
a255
f, LIT
2.8'}9
TOTAL HUMAN St°'IVI,Ifri7
------------------------------------------
,v4,5JC
256,978
150,702
PLANNI.YL; .ANU LOi,ING DtPARTMU'T
1.1;71-
1.073-
4—
AJMINISTRATI.7,, „'iU PLAN?Iih;
it,147
11!147
46
f0TAL PL,. KVICE-
1?r.850
'04, 356
85,866
FATAL C(iLI TR A', 11)AL SERVICES
1 70
11,T54
5,326
T ti;T AL CUM:1�30i T ltS
1, 2uT
2.394
14
TOTAL CA°'ITAL 1_ XP,, 11111 UR>. S
7,100
5,400
4L
T)I AL 0L I St6V1,'
:2,100
9. OTZ
V,680
T UT AL ADMI .,ST -.AI 1=J,i A"il PLANNI'4C
1.1, 0�i0
L2':916
103,132
;Jt -€IL i1F Vi L ?PW'11
TUTAt ot"I9:.AL S'xVICCi
2-.20;5
1?1629
27,2F3
T t,TAL CuITd Ar, T€!AL ...wYICCS
_i.001i
14,994
8,853
IUTAL CAPITAL `-_XPt;,0TiUkt S
,9110
eel ,SU0
T 11- AL ; ;.Lll. 1 SIC a'" Vt: LL; P-'_'vf
7' ,Z00
',7,123
36,124
i O','NFOAN I,E Ut VE L+7PAI'.!i T -TIS
TI,`AL i''E4 Sal.. NL �. f�l<F£E
'i x0:t�1
15, 7;2
16,477
IJIAL CC, ILRA"IUAL S.-RVIL�S
_ ,001
37,494
26,186
TOTAL J€34NF VIN PT WVi Lf9lPfI-:_NT-IIF
11,003
5x1226
43.158
VAGL 16
1101 r? te'+E F: U'ILNCU`i ,
>,At A i£= E1rLi-1f1=°_t2Fi� 3ALA`,CE .iAL
5,63}
:'>„ 711
Z1, 111
._
2,961
�:� Fr'
2x074
26
135
135
4
344
344
29
969
1.938
1,'036
20
d"il,
26.104
26,304
27
Ix�.35
e6zk!
14
152
lf,l-
11-
3, V-5
3.395
l00
F,18J
4. f'4-"
'„842
29
3.42.,
x,849
6,849
17
1.481
7.,1't0
7,83'7
42
4.90T
I4,6,,9
14.f F;'�
25
2,380
L.:, �!9`,
10,;395
37
324
123
123
IJ,
1,715
tt: U1'S
11,01n
36
154
411
403
25
PO
240
24U
25
323
143
743
51
557
1,446
1.446
34
18,.'_82
"8.714
53,79,3
29
8.859
39.9f1`
34.904
32
1,784
1'.1.374
111,374
56
35
94.1
940
29
7.,Jl
1,2x'0
1')C
I*?IJ
,420
2:420
10
11,x84
.0,'3.9
7'3,910
37
2.104
1.1;71-
1.073-
4—
it,147
11!147
46
3".U0U
30,JJU
LJL
2OC4
40.114
4%.0 14
i3
1128I
I.UCX
4,02M
14
3,089
[3,414
23.f 14
4L
'.,370
27.9 rZ
27,d4?
39
ViLLAe E III 140O4T PROSPELT
`_,UOC:E1 EXPENSE AEPUAT
ACURINTLIG PERICU 09 ENGIN; 113111x9
Iva i-'39 Y -T -O Y -T -U LUF NC
1t,orLT FSTl-MATF ACTUAI A1T❑-t)
PLANNING ANO t0[+1 G DiPARTM_t-IT
2.`22
Lr522
Yz
(O'36 AOMNISFk,i)l0!?
2?, buL
29,65.)
3C
T')TAL Fcl; :, tT''IAI_ S=riVIC�_'-
24,500
2?, 194
20.9;1
TYITAL CUJU, ..TUAL
701)
13.233
11.491
TUFAL LUM h.0)1 TI F',
I,39J
112
121
IOT%L CAPITAL ',XPt,UITURES
3t,500
c4.116
1, 75C
T')T,L CU'G Af•Ml-.1 STVAt IOto
J- IJ0
7'.4,515
34.305
COuG R"SIUE.4T14L Rf-PAOILITATIt,N
9, 466
9,4115
13
l,1TAt PLK.C.Jf.l_ Sf MILLS
"'000
4, 5uu
3.478
TuI.,L CA-'ITAL 'XPL:+Ol TURES
10,; Out)
74.917
70.332
101AL LTI�G `1ESIJaATIAL REHAbILITAT
I'j-,OJG
79,497
73,L41C
LO, G CCt`PlLRLIAL REHARUITATIO'.
31's78
?1,578
99
T )T AL PL,, SOMA: SF RV IC LS
1,.4u0
3,294
3,037
T,)TAL CGNTRALTUAL Si RVICES
12 #004)
91 OJO
766
TUTAL CAPITAL TXPt NUITURFS
.,*,OUO
34, 41Y
99
TUT.L LU -1; LOW RLIAL 'LAAHILITATL
x',400
t6, 791
4.603
CUE!+, RECAEATIOAAL AREA UEVE.LOPMENT
39Zr844
392,H43
52
TOTAL CAPITAL tXPENUIRW S
1>,OQO
55,494
64012
TGTAL L:), G n=C,VATIO.4AL AREA OEV£L
7rr.J00
55,494
64,511
CUBk; MULTI -FAMILY WlIABItITA1ION
3.923
31
Tui AL PERS:3�4.1L SFRVICES
,.000
4,500
422
TOTAL CAPITAL EXP�:MUITURES
,000
19,494
LL
TOTAL CUBE `iOLF1-FAMILY V, HARILIIA
32,Ou0
c3.994
422
CO` --G UUdNT13,01 14PPOV,�MENTS
1,71',
199711,
14
TUTAL PERSONAL S�PVLCtS
3,000
2,250
44
TOTAL CUA TRAL TUAL SLRVTI-fS
+,030
3,744
2G
FJTAL CAPITAL tX^F_.:)1TIIR",
G',OUO
k9,5U0
839
TOTAL CU "'G UU,:NTu'4N II•'--ROV �M�NTS
74,0,)0
5i, 494
839
TOTAL 11LAI4M1,ING ACG ZO 41 NG W. 'AE TMLN F
------------------------------------------
7n 1, 750
5b5, 110
360,907
STkEt_T UIVISI3M
AUMIMISTRATIO;d ANO SUPPORT
f•ITAL PEP ,?'.AL St «VI1, S
l ,?,740
1,,,7,,9
134,bi4
T'tT,.L CUiiTAA'.TUAL SfRVIC`S
9.0(10
6,741
5.Q35
TUT AL LLA 'IL:OITIi:S
12tELie
9.535
6,877
TOT%ICAPITAL EXPE1,3ilURr_S
7,700
5,769
5,691
TGTOL OV,T SIT,VItc tXP`(,jSE
7:`,tEO
XZ,632
56,144
T )T4L .: ,11''IST,t.-71')'4 A7jt) .,I)PP,3kI
20, 1.420
21 ,496
211,2bl
1AINTOW4CF OF r')GLIC HttILi IN ;S
T(,T.AL PLI, 04,kL S'=i;VICrS
143.3•.5
1,)7,496
123,6,6
FI)lAL CC''4 Fk A_II)„L ,-.lVTCLS
7),930
53.If, 3
39,861
TOTAL COM4010f TIL',
81,900
b1,380
65,156
T13IAL CAVIT.,L 1XP_A1-)l T')RFS
9•-,000
71,982
38,033
T -_IAL 't.,I�1T: Nr'1. .'F PUOLiC AJILUI
3'1?,165
2)4,021
Zb6, 701
1.750
373
eAG,_ 17
U<;'XP, ;1'E') t)tJEhCIN ,
',wi 11C, E.'Ct,IE-, k -L d�LANCE '3AL
H, Env F166" 29
14.203 14.203 55
1.113 1.173 90
35.7:,0 35.750 95
5'1.7`:`, 59,711; 64
34')
2.`22
Lr522
Yz
7.351
2?, buL
29,65.)
3C
1,700
3,..90
32,190
30
91
561
563
13
I 1,234
11,234
94
4�, OUR
46,UC19
100
91
57,797
57.797
93 .
20,001
9, 466
9,4115
13
2U.001
9148:3
4s4:;F
13
52
5,579
5r57ti
93
26. 0011
2',5. UCO
100
51
31's78
?1,578
99
'.0aO
J. VL,U
100
`-,Uu0
5.000
100
,,',It1
65,LE1
99
13,1b1
73ribl
99
49.0Z9
39Zr844
392,H43
52
11,864
53,126
53,12b
2b
L2�?
3.065
3,00"
34
1.7G3
3.923
31
0.9
L.O09
26
7ruL6
L4, 0-
14 103h
LL
21.410
7' , 1f,0
7.,1 59
Lt•
19,,b1
1,71',
199711,
14
4,707
)1,039
31.039
44
17.805
15,741,
16,744
2G
61
:7.162
57,962
6C
4br1bJ
124. 4t-4
IZ'1464
32
V1LLA;,f J)- MOUNI PRUSPELT
I,UOGET L_XPENS6. FFPC.tT
ACCOUNTI-7G PtRI`lU O9 F'INN'= 1/31/49
1`11lb-N9 Y -T -n Y -7-U CUA .MO
iIODC-T ESTIMATt- ALTUAL ACTUAL
SIllL, I 0IVI4IU,
UaEhCOM
'z
IALANL I E-,CU'-lt%r RIcU
k:,AI NTE.VANCT ')F
TIAL
I,90=
I,9U0
TOTAL PE11 SJ,NAL }`!(Vtf-S
96,4`61
74. 5d
47.557
TOT AL LOCI IR A, TU.,L S'=L,VILFS
.:1.500
16,119
20.3t6
T�.JTAL CUO4391TILS
-•,30r)
4.338
1.975
TI)IAL CA`IIAL LXF�WITUP[S
2:Z,31'0
16,713
13,872
I IT AL )1.11;.3 =N IdCF 'IF Gi(Pt CS
149,'),5
111.753
135,720
STKtLT MAI 41-o icc
23
155,744
153,749
T17TAt. "E,<SONAL S, RVIftl
ST, 170
!.5,358
70,350
rill AL CONTRA` rUAi_ S::RVTLt-S
43.200
67.894
22,608
T€JT AL Ct,FaUUI I1 f,,
J4,300
25, 7U4
24,758
TJTAL CAP I7AL FXPE'.UI TORS
..,«,;)UO
644,976
706,252
1 UT AL STYE F MA I'I If_NA NC
Ien74, h70
/105,932
d23. 968
SVLI. RLM'lVAL
TUTAL TCi9''lAL o.I;VIC,,
c5r 395
.62,532
39,849
T'.)TAL Cat! IRA[ IUAL S..RVICES
+-,8U0
5,085
225
TJTAL CUMMUU[TIES
4-,.509
3h, 369
46,085
TOTAL CAPITAL FXPENDITUkFS
115,J00
96,238
103.341
TOTAL iNf), +,FWIVAL
253,694
19),224
189.505
LLAF REMOVAL
I')TAt PF'.SLIIAL S't-'.VICCI
75,970
40,5153
60,260
(UTAL CU',Iaa,TOAL SLRVIL�S
I,OOO
'7.238
10,144
TOTAL CJt1M00ITitS
1'-,30'7
10,710
8,424
TJTAL CAPITAL EXP_NOITUKLS
Gc, 00!7
16.497
21,940
10TAL LE'�F <EMIIVAL
91.170
7;', '128
100. 77 2
STORM SEWLk ANO 9ASLM MAINTENANCE
TOTAL PEKSf+IAL S'.RVICLS
31,110
29,322
37,765
TOTAL CUVTKA"IUAL 'it:kVILcS
4L, 900
31.332/
54,435
IOTAL COMtT'OW T[ES
IJ,OJO
7,438
4,319
11)7,4 STUk1 SF W A140 ftiSI-I MA[NT�
`tU, 91U
69,148
16,539
FI)d'c�T'Y
TUTAL PEn SORA[ S"kYICLS
17'•,22'?
13).635
142,935
TUTAL Ci.41kALTOAi ::LkYli:e�
217.000
1b2,7t9
145,354
TJTAL LOOWIL,(TIES
11e0OL)
8,235
5,619
T[_T AL CA('t VAL LI);3I TURF S
77,00')
54,738
62, OA
IOr.NL 3E:E`,TkY
476,210
716.337
355,9bd
r,AFFIC =16:.1'4AI1fFtfi,Cc
I;;IAt I't RS!!it4L SFdVICI,
4),909
32,913
28.495
FUJAL CUM it)!)IIIt
i7.6UO
13,195
8,376
IOTA_ CAPITAL X!6: ii)TIUki-S
-,Ovn
4,500
5,OZ2
TJl i6L. 1,,'F- a SC -;a MA If TF.,IA'iCL
t,7 r`= 0
50, 596
41, P.43
PU9LIC GkOIJN�, ;.f=.,U]IFILATIUN
T�)I ,L Rt4S"..1A, :.rkV[LL`
3;,260
26,352
26.038
TO[At CO`IRALTUsL S_RVICES
1,1,000
7,497
I UTAL CJMMU'JI LIES
1td00
5,)'50
5.439
[OTAL CAF IIAL t XPLP,GIffJtitS
15,00()
18,738
6,570
11 IAL PUiL.i. t, 1'=iJ^:'IS L`.AVIIFLCAFIJ
71.9:,0
',P,437
38.047
5e3bd
45l
S.F2J
2.v22
271
'sob
Lb :425
22.172
16,093
225
211771
60
441161)
950
144
57h
1,67U
L,b14
366
3,1EtO
11,745
X22
2,)51
391
14,015
21J54
1,277
1.33-
5, bf, r
,33n5,661
1 t294
665
1,959
,, 16
U'[E:01r';L!60
UaEhCOM
'z
IALANL I E-,CU'-lt%r RIcU
hALAN(,=
TIAL
I,90=
I,9U0
2
1,134
t.Ic64
h
l,trLS
1,775
11
4;'J
5,419
34
16,820
16rR20
19
70,5 ),*
70,592
76
a.'i42
9.5LIZ
23
155,744
153,749
1F+
25),703
250, TC,'
23
43,5'47
41.547
52
6.515
6,575
97
2.416[,
415
lle F53
11,653
1J
E4.191
b4,19U
25
1,3110-
3,
,3'i0-
3, 144-
`rL72
elf,
`rf,OG-
1, T:'5
7,365
5.641
L4,37t
31.2 75
71,6'.7
1 C. 92 n
l 1'1 < G ? •�
15,4G5
'1. , 4
7'3
5, 607
6, 3Y0- 12-
3,[44- 45-
5,812 41
60 o
31592- 4-
1.325 3
7,365 18
5, bb 57
14,371 Lb
31,275 L8
71,646 33
5,3£2 49
lt', 91'a l5
119.21[ L
iq,-.n9 39
9,224 12
'ala 16
25, bu7 3R
`,le2 9,122 Z6
10,0JO IO,OJU NO
2"36i 2:.1161 3C
19.138 113,43[) 74
3`+,'%5 39,+L3 51
VLLLAt.F i't
MUJNI PKUS-'tt.l
-.A=_
sV
IUD';FT
':XPLNS, '?FPURT
ACCOUiNIVI" PtRIOL,
04 ENDING
1/31/}$9
1934-1i9
Y-T-D
Y-T-1)
CUM 110
U1JEYPFND60
UNENCUM
ri•!OGrT
E]TI MATT
ACTUAL
ACI UAL
BALANL;E Ht LJyNt: RH)
UALAr,CE
°)Al
S7REi"{ UIVt SL J'i
MAIt<TINANLF `IF STATL t,IGH1IAYS
TOTAL PLRSQN&L Sc,cVtCtS
7:110
5,373
7.824
PHI
Srth-
f4L-
9-
TOTAL C04 WA:,TUrL SLR Of Lt.S
7:SUO
5,016
1.806
L33
5,694
1,64,
7t,
T(,TAL C(1Nli)ULII=S
2+ 'IUD
18,360
5,237
e,563
IV, Lbt
I9,263
79
TIi1 AL CAP 11 AL FXP': ':)I TURLS
8.000
5,994
1Z, 797
3,220
4,791-
-,,797-
60-
TL.'TAL 14AIN11 NAN-JF STATE HIGHaAY
47,180
35,343
Z7, 664
6.80:1
19. 91t
r.9.51t
41
-UUIPMcNT MAI ITL ANCF
TUTAL PERS11i94L S-RVICES
7x,725
59,022
63.967
6.355
14,753
14.756
19
TUTAL CONTRACTUAL St-PV{CES
2,500
11 H63
2.582
218
,_
811-
3-
{f,TAL CUMMt'UITIt�,
1I,.5UO
86,616
94,7d7
14,136
.10.711
3U,113
27
TUTAL CAPITAL rXPE,,,0ITUf:Fz.
).500
1,110
1.7,1
7,779
7,774
42
T`1THL C'iI-1PMFNT '?ATNTtNANCE
2,,1,,225
154,611
153,057
20.809
51.158
53,16b
Z6
PUUL VVHICLE h11INT�,4ANGt
T-JTAL PLRSUNAL Sr RVICES
„125
4.5dl
4,355
442
1,770
1.770
29
TTAI- CIN TRA-TUAL ;cKVILFS
3.900
2,916
3.400
500
SOU
tg'
TUTAL LuMmn-)ITItS
Ss 65'1
4,977
7,173
2.1)26
5: 3-
5Z3-
T:lTAL CAPITAL `.-. XPFNt)ITURtS
1•,:0DU
11,997
11.257
4.143
4,143
is
71iT.LL POOL VEHILLE MAINTENANCE
.?,675
x4,471
26.185
1.468
0.490
S,49J
ZO
THAFFS' SICAALS C STHLEI LIGHTING
TUTAL CONTRA-J UAL St,RVTCCS
2.+1,11U0
195,750
115,057
7,478
145,943
145,943
56
TUTAL COMMODT fit -S
h.OilO
4,500
901
593
5109
5,099
85
FUTAL CAPITAL cXPt':UITURFS
54 .5O0
399366
31,530
28:1
20.97
10,970
41
TUTAL TRAFFIC SLL'iALS F STRCET LIG
319.500
239,616
147,488
'1,.551
112,012
17? Ili 12
54
FLO,JO CONTRDL
TUTAL CUNTRA'_TUAL SLPV10ES
TUTAL FLUi)-) (,—Y4FRUL
0
0
TUTAL ST,FT:T LIVISIJP= 3.57t.345
------------------------------------------
2,677,815
2,594,788
205,449
9t,
l ,161
476.557
27
WATrR AND SLJLK '11V1.; ItI'1
AO4II ISTRATI,N AN-) SUP-10RT
TI)TAL gtr)S',.AL S±-YVICLS
20113.19
152.505
138,965
12.404
6a,46s
64,405
3z
TUTAL CUNTRAi.TUAL 4 RVICCS
3 6.000
265.931
259,400
3WIU
x6..01
96.600
21
T,3ThL Li1`'1a•i:JUTlIc`i
-1,050
15,768
15,352
2,174
5.0Sh
5,69P
Z7.
.`LAM- CAPITAL LXPe' I,ITMES
8.000
1,994
£1.569
50U
L,411
1,411
10`.
T')TsL UL,tT S=HVIL, [M--ISE
327.730
245,772
217,1'3
25.523
110,177
i10,577
34
T�.il AL AtIMI,di STH ,' i.iN ,', n!t' ,IIPPJRT
9i;,s 177
X66,970
637,419
75,811
218.1,92
_7';, 6q
30
MAI')7-t;ANC' ,IF .'UvL,r R11L,INu3
Tui ..L a0 SJNAi S, HV ICL S
13.230
9.909
12,593
3,910
637
6.17
s
1 OTnL CL,'I TRA"IUAL NI-KVI CFS
>, 700
4,266
3,bU3
1,655
.'197
Z:Oto7
37
TUTAL Cut;M:JUITIcS
121Din
8,991
4.tHI
1,346
7,d13
79613
65
TLA AL CAPIT IL LXP- +•'>I T1 IR'
•-.500
4.122
46,761
30
41.261-
y1, 261-
73il-
1.JIAL 4AIN1. NA*,L'_ OF PIMLIC AJIL91
3,,,430
27,283
67.144
6,941
11;117;4-
3n, 714-
p -
F'AI'NT#_'; VILE 1,F GRIM', 3,
FOTAt. S'_.1V,Ct'
3 .640
Z7.46P
30.540
736
6. IOU
t,lUO
17
TGTAL COMAODITIt'
4,400
6,300
384
9,•117
8.016
95
. " 3UDGET� 1:XPENSE RtPORT, ,
ACCQJNTINU PCRLOP 09 ENOIN,S 1131/,19
7-ci9
Y-1-0
Y -T -U
CUN. MC
U1+,KPI10Et:
-J`IE'!CU'1
r
raOGET
FirlMAT,
ALTUAL
ACTUAL
�I.A-Aof-f
E3C"!'L3�-P=[� 1,LAt&F
IAL
WAFEn A14') SEW�u JIV[:Et,y
N AI NT1 NAlt£t OF 6Ru'frinS
It,TAL CAPITAL FXPr.!IITURI-S
400
297
25
37S
3€5
34
TOTAL :i111%1-NANt,:- (IF G20l7S"lS
4'".440
34.365
30,9•,9
736
14,492
14,''91
12
kAT(lP SUPPLY MAINT•-rA'iCI- G RFIIAIR
1U1 it PLRS't"r.AL S:_,VICLS
1311: LUS
IU), 566
t04. 118
11,937
29.127
Z9,9.'-7
Z2
T UT. AL CUN Tr; A:: IUAL Sf-PVT CES
124, UOU
92.979
18,434
6,753
45.566
4,,-566
37
TUTAL CU"'=t10!SI IIES
11+,500
[4,625
11,017
5,rt0i
"7.423
d,4"3
`r3
TUTAL £APIIAL tXPt-'.OITUkE:S
i+ -000
27,070
17.7.31
lf'..1,I9
18,1(.9
5 1
TOTAL WA[E't SUPPLY MAINTFIANCE G R
313,605
Z35,1TO
2 11, 42 0
14.091
1+72.1€t5
11)2,11,5
33
WATLk LIIS11' 1PUTION 4AINI. b RE PK.
TUf.L PE,`S)NAL SF 3V ICE'.
11,'885
86,'04
118,023
11'839
2.t3R-
1038-
TC- AL CU'rttCAF IUAL SLRVTCl- S
1`)-601)
14,697
3,34E
11100
16.252
16.252
33
T,JIAL CUt"i'MI 1I --S
42, TOO
32,OZ2
33,246
1,552
9,454
9,454
22
TUTAL CAPITAL IX;1tNul LURES
IJ>.000
79.497
27.302
3,464
T8.6 If,
78.n9P.
74
1'ITAL 'Aft )IST't IPOTION 4AIN1. G
184,119
213,120
181,919
18.955
1u 1.�'. E,6
IOt e.'E6
3h
WATER VALVE: ANO HYDRANT MAINT.
TOTAL ?LRSI11AL SI--RVICL?
1'1,1340
11,311
40,330
3,U88
4.:`lu
41s51D
51
TOTAL CC'lTRAf"IUAL SEKVTLFS
7U0
511
384
316
316
45
TUTAL CUHMODIT[§S
49,ZOO
30,141
14.021
739
Zu.179
26,179
6S
FUTAL CAPITAL FXPcIIUITUkCS
35.000
63,147
67,378
60
17,122
17,6"1
21
TUV.L VATcR VALVE-. Ary11 f'Ynk ANT MAIN
2'11,747
15`i,731
122,It3
3.E67
'15,617
1,5,6"7
41
WATER 1`tT1R INTAL.REPI.G RE -L.
T ..1TAL PiRS'I4.AL o'-KVILL,
1
2.+`'95
45,519
4,314
24,762
It,1
3`•
TUT.L COVTk A'.:IUAL SLAVIC -S
3,, o09
Z6199Z
41.259
786
14.741
14,741
4t
TOTAL COMM_^.IITILS
7l-,6113
55,935
15.498
11038
59,102
54,IU2
79
TOTAL CAIITAL ..: XPf IIUI TU:A° S
20.3-J0
14, 994
L5,390
4, OU2
4.602
23
+`lTTAL kATE' MET'P 1i. `i TAL.f.EPP.G RE
2ut,11,`10
150,0011
97,674
6,138
103,2U7
to 3, t16
5t
FJUIr'A' It' ''AINFc'!A%Cf- G '3PERATIONS
TiT AL PERSONAL S:kVIC S
111.630
38,200
1U6,377
11,919
9,25.1
;e, Z!,3
•3
€�!TAL CONTRACTUAL ;RVIC`S
3.JU0
2-170
1.845
12d
t,L55
1,155
39
TOTAL C11 -V: UITItS
'1[.300
,3,463
65.9104
11:,487
2i, 30b
25'3u6
ZF
TIJT AL CAi-'ITAL --X?-YpI I(2f:S
3.'.Ou0
23,985
32,543
1,944
343-
543-
-
TuTAL -i'IIPM!-.NT 4AINTt:401LE F. UPER
Za3.93O
18: :'398
20P.7.9
24,478
35,171
3`.'171
14
SA'411At( SC n`:K MAIV7. G F"FPAik
Tt,TAL PLR: .)AAL SiiVtC-
S•', 350
45.252
39.961
3.910
Z0, 3ti9
ZU.3B9
34
Fit FAL CU"-sIk4LTUAL S;FRVTCF S
I'Ojf)
5'247
7ra00
7.00(1
100
f 11 AL CUMMOUt[I E"<
9,070
6,741
4. Oil
:1510"1'
4 X
55
TUFAL CAPITAL cX+'F�i UI 7})Kf=S
,,�il0
3,r44
1,.0"o
lic
I JT.,L `-41TA,Y ..1_ R -K Md INT. G REPA
o1, 159
6),9134
43,973
4,564
37.517
37e X77
t6
WATER SYSTLA 1 YF LJV:MEVT"
TOTAL CAPITAL CXPcNDITUR`:S
Ii -.501)
74,119
99,500
6,000
6.1100
6
TOTAL WAFET SYSFLII IMPROV_-MF*DIS
1.;'i. 500
79,II9
99,500
6. Ou
J
c,
SANITARY SF df_K ,NPI-UVEMENTS
TUTAL PE!LSOAIAL StRV10ES
1,940
1-449
5.053
1.004
7-113-
3,113-
160-
T'3TA1 CAPITAL=XPE'1UII-URFS t,Uu'x,000
753,712
175.OtU
ZUS.095
22x,980
23
VILLAGE Or MOUNT PROSPECT
PUDf,FT EXPFNSL REPOkT
ACCOUNTI,G PERIUO 09 ENDING 1131199
19t"i-89 Y -1-T? Y -T -D CUk ,MG
-11JOGET=STTMATL ACTUA} Arne.,
WATL" ANj SEWER '.'IV ES lOJ
aA',c
21'
W"-YP-N')LJ
TUT1,L SAV ITARY SE4FR hMPRUVL Mt"ITS
1,001„940
755.181
78t), 1,3
LAKE MICNI. AN -ATER ALWOTSITION
t_'t,.3.t7
22t"4,J7
23
TUTAL PERS}}NAL S,-{V1i:tS
5,500
4.122
5,::.7::1,
TUTAL CO'+TkA:.TUAL ;E.�VtcrS
1,655.000
1.241,235
1,096.276
TUTAL CAPITAL '-XPc�W TURCS
1,3.3t.000
99P,244
9U9, 298
.'�lT„L LAKE MTC LIGAN',!ATER ACOJI SIT2.991,3130
1,317,-::33
2,243,671
2,0.95,574
TJTAL VAT.'2 AiD ,L5:=r' r; IV I.,IOId
5,43",670
4,`!24.71334.566,637
9,261
PARWI G SYSTEM UIVISPON
23
23
23
ADMINISTRATION Alit) SUPPURT
+-,00
20
t 1,.:354
Ti)TAL PEIS.04AL SERVICES
11.175
9,319
7,225
TOTAL CO4TkACTUAt Sf:Q VlC`S
2,885
21,654
19.604
TUTAL CCM43DITIES
100
72
77
TJTAL OE`?T Si-RVIC, cXPENSt
31000
2,250
2,400
TW AL AD9I0:ISTRA11014 ANO SUPPORT
4),160
32,355
29,306
PAPKli,JG LUT MAINTtMAt'CF
TJTAL PERSUNAL SERVICES
+,1,;10
2,754
2.505
TOTAL CU'JTRAC[UAL StRVICtS
1'),5-10
7,8()0
6,764
TUTAL CUM,MODIIIES
4000
3,375
3.143
TUTA, CAPITAL LXF-%J1TUKrS
47,100
7 2, 954
46,507
TOTAL PARKING LUI MAINTLNANCF
Ite,980
86,949
58.899
TOIAL PARKING SYSTEM I VIStO
-------------------------------------
15't,140
1 19, 304
88,2U5
EW,1Nf ERING CIVI113N
ADMINISTRATI'J.d AND SUPPIIRT
TUTAL CwTRA' .TUAL S,RVIC"i
TOTAL AUMI^JISTRATION AVD SUPPJRT
PU11L1C 1"Pd.Jdt`4ENT I'JS€'ECTlUt4S
TOT,iL Ft+'.SUNAL SEk%QCSS
TJTAL PJ1iLIL 1'311EUVtMERT INSP.CTI7
T3AFT-TC FA(,1'7EcRJriO, £. MATtJTENANCE
TOTAL CIJNTk A+ PJAL SRVICES
TJTAL TkAFFIC (SGTNLFRi 4l, E M,. .NTE
ST,iLcl LIG411'46
TGTAL CUNTR,:CTUAL :,-RVTCES
TiITAL STRICT LI';-41I'Jf
TOTAL EN,INFFRIN, it►VISIU.V
------------------------------------------
RLFJSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SuLIO .4ASTc D15P'1SAL
TJTAL COVTR.-.11)AL STRVTC'S
1,479,000
1.109,241
976,960
zoo,099
115,689
1C+.922
220,610
59R, 314
924
2,39U
300
3,614
190
aA',c
21'
W"-YP-N')LJ
5, 7v6
1.796 36
1,AL-' JC_
4}7CL! UI RlU NALA,VLF
OAL
t_'t,.3.t7
22t"4,J7
23
1, 00
5,5:0
l0U
5,::.7::1,
5i 9,T24
34
341:702
341 t'U2
26
90'5,926
9(;5,'12 11
1G
i, 91,7,11 iS
1,317,-::33
A9
3,950
3,950
35
9.-''11
9,261
32
23
23
23
600
+-,00
20
t 1,.:354
13, It 54
32
190
1, 17i
1,175 32
3t630-
5, 7v6
1.796 36
385
1.317
1,317 29
39735
SJ, 7;3
SU, 7'73 52
680
57, J<;1
57,Oot 49
4,294
70,93'*
711r935 45
0
cl
L
0
r
D
i
123,13U 90 „411 SG2, 149 34
VA -. -2?
UFiL t P t NDFit 1111 _ML UM %
3At ANL, F1`'CUMf.'-K:-0 LALANCI ',AL
S°. 1o2 `9,162 90
`+6I, 3G2 561.302 3t
0
0
C
0
C
0
61,302 161,362 3r,
t,Jl�-
3et11+-
VILt_A(;E Ur
MCUM PRUS,'FLT
431-
C
:iLM.ET EXPENS
t:EPORT
49
45..135
ACC')UN€ING
PLRICD
C9 F.VOIN:; 1/31/89
253, i15
I P't-39
Y -T -U
Y -T-0
LNR 110
b,90 )
-V101=iT
FSTIM.AT-,
ACTUAL
ACTUAL
PO-UlL GISOOSAL OIVI.IIJN
341, 701
341,702
26
341,702
SOLID WASTE U13PnSAL
26
1 Q. 372
132.372
19
TUTAL CT.M:ga JITI,S
"1000
10,500
6,838
13I.4ZE
TUT.L ,it I1 WA.,V DI SF'iS AL
1.14`+,00')
1,154,741
983,698
123,330
TUTAL CAPITAL FXPE.N01 IUkFS
34-
75,'.64-
7`,259-
32-
2-T.`i6
TOTAL SJLIU WA!,Tt `IISP'ISAL
27:St.6
92
t_7,*?6H
27. SGF
TJTAL CAPITAL cXPENDITUR(S
1, U
1, 37£1.253
19
TOTAL Sill I.) WASFf OISPG!.AL
VITAL CAPITAL EXP,"4[)ITURES
TOTAL S;01-17 ':AST;. DISPJSAL
f OTAL RcFUSL t)ISPJSAL DIVISION
------------------------------------------
1,S45,OJ0
1.143,74E
983,698
123,330
CAPITAL 1MPkflvEMF NTS
GOWNTG:"i Rc UEV-L'JPM,NT LM45TRUCTION
TUTAL PEr. Sit;IAL Sd KVICc�
3,016
TUTAL CONTRATFOAL SFRVTCES
43I
TUTAL CAPITAL FXUE`LITURt S
433,235
314,909
222,308
x084
TOTAL DtuT St KViC- EXPVNSE
I24,5uO
43,366
78,665
27,018-
TJTAL ::OMNT_td,Y t; -W V1 LOP -,Ni LO -NST
551,735
418,215
3'34,420
11,034-
PUIILIC WUkKS FACILITY CJNSTRUCTION
TUTAL CAPITAL 1Xi'r >l.;I TUFFS
1,44',,000
2,--,-,732
3,255,744
195,431
TJTAL OE?I SO kV ILc FX0'1,I1;E
464,000
437,994
575,100
404,150
TiOTAL t'U,,LIC Bi,�P:, FAC ILIIY CUN5TP4,521,000
3,39b,726
3,A30.694
599,881
LAK/ MIC`i1GAN WATER - JF,TRUCTION
TOTAL UE:OT 'itRVfl. EKPF 4-,E
1,331,300
-)19,244
989,298
109,92,.
1JTAL LAKE I4IL111iA.4 4.TFR frlf-'STttUC
1, 33tev00
9`ty.2"'.
989.298
10'0,922
GEGKGc1ALFEtT CJNSTIAILTION
TOTAL CAPITAL FXPc-1r1TUWS
7-'- "Wo
52-4,723
572,628
273, 00
T;;T AL OF1,F Si=kVll- tXPf'4SE
24,810
15,612
24,364
1,at AL [; ,._"RC„IAL. -i,T '<, ".STrc UuT10)'V
TZ 'I, R10
147,335
596,992
273,1100
C JN,KU4f TY I "PR'T1t!4E JS
TUTAL CUATRA:.,UAL :-RVIL'i
,Z,GOO
9.UU0
T:)TAL CAV IT Al- :-.tl't"':I TUS.-S
227.000
IoP,750
312,264
217,133
TUTAL Cu`'111;1 FY 1146ROV-MF :, TS
23',000
177,750
312.269
217,133
GE,ILKAL FCUIP F. TMP.FVMNTS
T.IT AL CAP I f AL ( X07.6'31 TUKL S
30„('90
21, 5u0
2.432
Tt1f.L (;c iEIAL c-,t111P C rMP'AVMNFS
3 .000
22.500
2,432
TUTAL CAPITAL 1.41' t tle10 '1 T S
------------------------------------------
7,414,555
5,5a0, 830
6,C 3b, 30;5
1,188001
VA -. -2?
UFiL t P t NDFit 1111 _ML UM %
3At ANL, F1`'CUMf.'-K:-0 LALANCI ',AL
S°. 1o2 `9,162 90
`+6I, 3G2 561.302 3t
0
0
C
0
C
0
61,302 161,362 3r,
t,Jl�-
3et11+-
C
v31-
431-
C
?I J, 927
210.927
49
45..135
45.935
37
253.1"5
253, i15
45
f d9, f. 06
1,8y 2U6
17
b,90 )
8. 901:
2
n+ .106
64B. 106
15
341, 701
341,702
26
341,702
341.IUZ
26
1 Q. 372
132.372
19
456
y56
2
11?"J':';
13I.4ZE
I,l
12,000
1 Z")C O
100
41.46,-
37.169-
34-
75,'.64-
7`,259-
32-
2-T.`i6
T. `i 6
27:St.6
92
t_7,*?6H
27. SGF
42
1, U
1, 37£1.253
19
FAGU3 '
UkcXPc'1LF0
UNLNCUM
V1LLA„t Of
PiQUNI PkUSPECT
EAC0'!lk REU BALAVLE
'SAL
G+JOGEI tWPENSE REP134T
1417.475
31
ACCOUNTL"L,
P.RI,lU
U9 EVDIN,
1/31/69
2,369-
1987-39
Y -T -D
Y -T -O
CUR .-10
1,553
P-13UGtT
ESIIMAT
ACTUAL
-CI UAL
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC Sch VICES
3,539
96
CUMMUMI TY ;;kOUP;
G
42
42
5
tiTAL CDVTRA-TUAL StRVICES
23t,900
113,889
44,425
1x0,965
TUTAL CUIIMMH ITY r;kOUPS
231,900
1731839
44,47_5
2,178,275
4TA OF JULY G CIVIC tVfNTS, PTC.
lOC
2,179,275
2,178,275
100
TOTAL PER SJ,%L 54.RVICES
12.000
8,932
14,369
983
TOTAL CONTRACTUAL S_-RVICES
12,000
9,OJ0
11,375
43
TOTAL CL;YMOJI T['_5
4r9'�0
3,627
3.297
177
TUTAL 4TH 1F JULY G CIVIC EV'NTS,
21.950
21,689
29.041
221,
15uLIOAY OECISRATIU"4S
1,IZ7.UUZ
1,127vJ0Z
n10
1.127,002
TOTAL "ERSUNAL S,o VICLS
3*6`SO
2.754
141
83
TUTAL CONTRALTUAL SERVICES
13.500
6.372
8,500
1,534
TUTAL COMMODITIES
800
594
756
1`0AL AU1"1RAY !SFCU^.%TIONS-
12,980
9,720
9.399
Z*834
TOTAL CUMfgUNI Tw AF,!r CIVIC SE,:VICES
------------------------------------------
27/,730
205.218
82,805
3.U54
LIVRARY SERVICES
LIoRARY UPERAT11NS
TUTAL ;7EtSI SLkVIC-" EXP -NSE
2,179,275
1,635,689
TAT.L Llls,idt'Y !3 r't RAIIVNS
Z.1711,275
1,633.659
TOTAL LI-IRARY S`_,VICiS
------------------------------------------
2,178.275
1,631,689
DEBT SERVICE FUN -)i
-
6LNERAL OPLIGATION SONOS
TOTAL 7E`T SERVIC,- EXPE4SE
1,2o7,245
950,355 1,266,257
555
TOTAL Gc:ERAL OJLIGATIIN .SONDS
112b7.245
950.355 1,266,257
555
SPFLIAL SERVICE AREA
T 1T AL Dt3I SLQVIL - CXP=NSE
4u",,31+5
3137, 332
377.591
TOTAL SPECI.AL S.r tVIC` ARTA 90NOS
4Jzi,8',5
3C 7. 332
377,591
TUTAL UE%j SCkVIt-E 1-UN!l,
------------------------------------------
i.671.110
1,257,687 1,643,8,8
555
PENSION FiFi1,S
tMPLOYEE PF NSIONS
T�,IAL JEOT -RVIti tr Pt
1,94,1JO
374,310
377,319
x!_.405
TIII,L-1"LOYI-t; PtASI�NS
49",100
374,310
377.319
4.'_*4U5
POLICL PtNSIu4%
TiiTAL C�E3T i--J,Vl- EXPFP:SE
I,41�,010
10061,235
287,994
3..911;
TOTAL PO,iC. W. lS SOW
1.41'.000
1,961,235
287,998
36,918
FIPLMEN, PENSIr135
T`'TAL 0E'.5 S_`<VIl 'F -,W -NSE
1,4un, 500
I, 1G1, 366
249,631
30.247
TRIAL FY't'i, MS t'FNSIPWt
L,4t4.500
1, l9t, 366
7.49,631
30,247
FAGU3 '
UkcXPc'1LF0
UNLNCUM
:3AtANCE
EAC0'!lk REU BALAVLE
'SAL
187.475
1417.475
31
10',475
t87,47i
'11
Z, 369-
2,369-
2C-
1,553
1.553
32
191-
191-
1-
3,539
96
G
42
42
5
3,581
3,531
28
190,465
1x0,965
7U i
2.178.175
2,179,275
tau
2,178,275
2,178,275
lOC
2,179,275
2,178,275
100
989
988
0
7Fl9
983
C
32,276
3[,274
6
32.L7b
32,174
f,
33,265
33.[62
2
121,IFlT
121,781
24
121,781
121,781
1.4
1,IZ7.UUZ
1,127vJ0Z
n10
1.127,002
1,127,OC2
90
1,218.869
1.218,8e9
83
1,213,869
1,21&.81:9
83
P ILL a -F OF MUUNT PRCSf ECF
0UOt.FT ;"XPENS= REPORT
ACCOONT 1.4G P=R1OU Oct FllUING I/31144
,'AGt 24
1`:Wr4-34 Y -T -U Y -T-±) CM .MCi
U14010" DUD UriER!C UM %
,}tltlG,T FSTt MAT- ACTUAL ACTUAL .iALAi lTL FNCUMhFRF9 1t+LAOCC €+SL
19TAL PEtiSFL.•'i FUJI+S 3.382 rb00 z"66,411 414.448 10415T6 73
VILL%GL OL MOUNT VRUiN'JCT
�'U9GCT EXPCNSL NFPLI4T
ACCUUNTI'.76 PtRTCD 09 LNDTN; 1/31le
1938-89 Y- T-0 Y -T -D CUR MU
:'-JUGET LST IMA TI_ ALTUAL ACTUAL
Tt'!AL i'UUGFT 'XPL3^,417.855 26,29E.b44
z 906 31193,195
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF
CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED 'ZONING ORDINANCE' OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, through its administration
(hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application
to amend various Sections of Chapter 14, entitled "Zoning
Ordinance" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held on the amendments requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 66-A-88 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 17th day of
November, 1988, and on the 15th day of December, 1988, pursuant to
due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prgspect
Herald on the 10th day of October, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the amendments
requested and have determined that the same would be in the best
interest of the Village and the Board of Trustees further find that
it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the
amendments specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Sections 14.1001.B.3 and 14.1101.B.3 of chapter
14 entitled "Zoning", as amended, are hereby further amended; so
that hereinafter said Sections 14.1001.B.3 and 14.1101.B.3 shall
be and read as follows:
113. Garages designed to house more than two (2) motor
vehicles, except as provided in Section 14.1001.C.6 and
Section 14.1101.C.6 respectively."
SECTION THREE: That Section 14.1001.C.6 and 14.1101.C.6 of Chapter
14 entitled "Zoning", as amended, is hereby further amended by
adding thereto the following; so that hereinafter said Section
14.1001.C.6 and 14.1101.C.6 shall be and read as follows:
"6. Allow garages designed to house more than two (2) motor
vehicles."
SECTION FOUR: That Section 14.1102.E of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning", as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety;
so that hereinafter said Section 14.1102.E shall be and read as
follows:
11E. Total Lot Coverage: Not more than forty-five percent
(45%) of the total lot area may be covered by impervious
surface, for R-1 Single Family Districts."
SECTION FIVE: That Section 14.1301.B.3 of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning", as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting said
Section 14.1301.B.3 in its entirety and renumbering the subsequent
paragraphs in proper numerical sequence.
SECTION SIX: That Sections 14.1702.A, 14.1802.A, 14.2002.A, and
CAF\
Ch. 14
Page 2 of 4
14.2102.A of Chapter 14 entitled "Zoning", as amended, are hereby
further amended in their entirety; so that hereinafter said
Sections 14.1702.A, 14.1802.A, 14.2002.A and 14.2102.A shall be and
read as follows:
"A. Minimum Front Yard: A thirty foot (301) minimum front
yard shall be required except if it is for a use on a lot
abutting another zoning district in which event the
setback from the front lot line shall be not less than
that required in -the district that this district abuts."
SECTION SEVEN: That Sections 14.1702.B, 14.1802.B and 14.2102.B
of Chapter 14 entitled "Zoning", as amended, are hereby further
amended by deleting said Sections in their entirety and replacing
as follows; so that hereinafter said Sections 14.1702.B, 14.1802.8,
14.2002.E and 14.2102.E shall be and read as follows:
11B. Minimum Side Yard: In this District a ten foot (101)
minimum side yard shall be required except that where such side
yard is adjacent to a right-of-way, this setback shall be thirty
feet ;301), if adjacent to a residential district the setback shall
be twenty feet (201).11
SECTION EIGHT: That Sections 14.1702.C, 14.1802.C, 14.2002.0 and
14.2102.0 of Chapter 14 entitled "Zoning", as amended, are hereby
further amended; so that hereinafter said Sections 14.1702.0,
14.1802.C, 14.2002.0 and 14.2102.0 shall hereinafter be and read
as follows:
11C. minimum Rear Yard. Any building or structure hereafter
erected or relocated in this District shall be set back
from the rear lot line and shall maintain a rear yard of
at least twenty feet (201), except that when such rear
yard is adjacent to a right-of-way the setback shall be
thirty feet (301).11
SECTION NINE: That Section 14.1701.A.1 of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended in its entirety and replaced as follows; so
that hereinafter said Section 14.1701.A.1 shall be and read as
follows:
"1. Shopping Center which shall be located on not less than
two and one-half acres in area."
SECTION TEN: That Section 14.2101.A.1 of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by deleting said Section 14.2101.A.1 in its
entirety and replacing as follows; so that hereinafter said Section
14.2101.A.1 shall be and read as follows:
"i. Automobile laundries."
SECTION ELEVEN: That Section 14.2101.0.3 of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended is
hereby further amended by deleting said Section in its entirety and
replacing as follows; so that hereinafter said Section 14.2101.0.3
shall be and read as follow:
"3. Satellite antennas with a diameter exceeding forty
inches (4011) subject to the following:
a. The maximum diameter of a dish shall not exceed
CAF/
Ch. 14
Page 3 of 4
thirty feet (301).
b. All ground -mounted antennas (including pole -mounted
antennas shall not exceed the height of the
buildings to which they are accessory.
C. All non -ground mounted antennas (including roof and
wall mounted antennas):
(1) Shall be located on the roof or on the rear or
side of the building to which they are
accessory;
(2) Shall have a maximum diameter of one-third
(1/3) of the height of the building to which
they are accessary; and
(3) Shall have a maximum height as allowed in
Section 14.2002.A.2.
d. All satellite antenna installations:
(1) Shall be located outside any required yard and
shall be a minimum of twenty feet (201) from a property line;
(2) Shall have an overall size and height which are
in proportion with the scale of the building to which they are
accessory; and
(3) Shall be fully screened from view from adjacent
roadways and properties (from grade level) with materials which are
compatible with the building to which they are accessory. Ground -
mounted satellite antennas shall be landscaped in a manner which
enhances the visual impact of the installation.
e. The area of a satellite antenna installation,
including screening materials, shall be included within the floor
area of the building to which it is accessory for purposes of
calculating maximum land coverage and floor area ratio, but not for
purposes of calculating the required number of parking spaces. 11
SECTION TWELVE: That Section 14.2201.B of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical
sequence "Retail Uses"; so that hereinafter said Section 14.2201.E
shall include the following:
11 Retail uses. It
SECTION THIRTEEN: That Sections 14.1701.C, 14.2001.0 and 14.2101.0
of Chapter 14 entitled "Zoning" of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, are hereby further amended by adding thereto
the following; so that hereinafter said Sections 14.1701.C,
14.2001.0 and 14.2101.0 shall include the following:
"Day care centers."
SECTION FOURTEEN: That Section 14.3016.A.3 of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by deleting said Section and replacing it
as follows; so that hereinafter said Section 14.3016.A.3 shall be
and read as follows:
CAF/
Ch. 14
Page 4 of 4
113. Width. Driveways shall be a minimum of nine feet (91)
and a maximum of fifteen feet (151) for one -car garages or twenty-
one feet (211) in width for two -car garages and shall be
unobstructed from any encroachment, such as chimneys, fireplaces,
and bay windows. The maximum driveway width shall include all
adjacent walkways."
SECTION FIFTEEN: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1989.
Carolyn H. Krause
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 21.601 OF
CHAPTER 21 ENTITLED "BUILDING CODE" OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, through its administration
(hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application
to amend Section 21.601 of Chapter 21, entitled "Building code" of
the Village Code of Mount Prospect, which amendment would increase
the permitted height of fences within the Village; and
WHEREAS, public hearings were held on the amendments requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 66-A-88 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 17th day of
November, 1988, and on the 15th day of December, 1988, pursuant to
due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospgct
Heraldon the 10th day of October, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the amendments
requested and have determined that the same would be in the best
interest of the Village and the Board of Trustees further find that
it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the
amendments specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE• The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Section 21.601 of Chapter 21 entitled "Building
Code", as amended, is hereby further amended in its entirety; so
that hereinafter said Section 21.601 shall be and read as follows:
"A. Fences not more than six feet (61) in height will be
permitted in the Village as follows:
1. Along the interior or rear lot lines and entirely
behind the front building line.
2. Any fence located along a public right-of-way shall
be set back a minimum of one foot (1,) from the
right-of-way line.
3. On corner lots, any fence shall be placed entirely
behind the rear building line along the side street.
B. Fences at least four feet six inches (41 611), but not
greater than five feet (51) in height to completely
surround swimming pools other than swimming pools having
a raised deck at least four feet six inches (41 611) above
grade and may be placed as follows:
1. Along the perimeter of the pool walk areas; or
Along the perimeter of the lot as described in
subsection A.1 and A.2 of this Article.
C. In a residential district, patio screening not to exceed
six feet (61) in height nor eighteen feet (181) in length
will be allowed nearer to the lot line than the building
is permitted, provided:
It is located adjacent to or adjoining a patio or
CAF/
Chapter 21
Page 2 of 2
swimming pool.
2. Said screening is entirely in the rear yard.
D. In industrial districts as defined in Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning" of this Code, fences nor more than eight feet
(81) in height will be permitted when used for the
purpose of screening accessory building material,
equipment or vehicle storage yard uses."
SECTION THREE: That is Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Carolyn H. Krause
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1989.
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Or
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-89, THE ALTER GROUP
LAKE CENTER PLAZA, WEST OF EIMHURST, NO OF ALGONQUIN
DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1989
At the Village Board meeting of February 7, Trustee Farley asked
for clarification as to the differences in the 1987 variation
request for Lake Center Plaza, and the current application.
The actual variations being approved are the same in both
applications. However, certain section numbers that authorized
the variations have changed, as a result of our new parking
requirements.
Specifically, the 1987 Ordinance included variations to Sections
14.2205.8 and 14.2907.8.2 pertaining to loading space requirements.
This same variation is approved with the current request, but from
Section 14.3012.8. Also, the 1987 Ordinance permits variations to
parking requirements of Section 14.2205.A and 14.2907.A to permit
"land banking" for future parking. This variation is not necessary
in the current request as our Section 14.3013 permits land banking.
DMC: hg
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER'
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-V-89, THE ALTER GROUP
LOCATION: LAKE CENTER PLAZA, WEST OF ELMHURST, NO OF ALGONQUIN
DATE: FEBRUARY 1, 1989
The Alter Group is requesting a one-year extension for variations
that were previously granted by the Village Board on September 1,
1987. As you may recall, these variations were part of a package
of requests which included text amendment, rezoning and special use
for the Lake Center Plaza property. Since construction did not
begin within one year of the September I approval date, the
variations become null and void. (The text amendment, rezoning and
special use remain intact.) The wording used in the new Exhibit
B submitted by the Alter Group is slightly different than the
approved variations in order to reflect the recent changes made to
the Zoning Code. A list of these variations can be found in the
January 26, 1989 minutes of the Zoning Board of Appeals hearing.
The Zoning Board of Appeals approved the variations as requested
by a vote of 6-0 with Mr. Lannon abstaining. No objectors or
interested parties were present in regard to this case.
PB:hg
APPROVED:
NW xl�
David M. Clements, Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 8-V-89
PETITIONER:
PUBLICATION DATE:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Hearing Date: January 26, 1989
The Alter Group
December 21, 1988
Lake Center Plaza
West side of Elmhurst Road
North of Algonquin Road
Variations as listed below.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Marilyn O'May
Robert Brettrager
None
Mr. Randy Thomas of the Alter Group and Mr. Lawrence Friedman,
attorney for the Group indicated that they were seeking the same
variations as requested a little over a year ago. The current
variations' time limit expired in September of 1988 and the Alter
Group would like the them extended for another year.
Paul Bednar, Planner, indicated that the same request is being
presented to the Board for which they have already granted approval.
No problems are foreseen.
Ms. O'May, seconded by Mr. Brettrager, moved to grant the following
variations:
1. With respect to the property located in the I-1 Zoning District,
the terms of Article XXII Section 14.2202 shall be varied so as to
permit:
(a) Subsection 14.2202.B.3 which required a thirty foot (301) side
yard for interior lot lines in the I -I District shall be varied to
allow a side yard of fifteen feet (151) plus one foot (11) for every
two feet (21) of building height above fifteen feet (151), subject to
the staff review and approval of the length of building;
(b) Section 14.2202.B.2 which requires a forty foot (401) side yard
for I-1 (Industrial) side yards adjacent to Residential Districts
shall be varied to allow a thirty foot (301) yard subject to
additional landscaping installed, which shall be reviewed and meet
requirements of the Department of Planning and Zoning;
(c) Section 14.2202.0.2 which required a forty foot (401) rear yard
for I-1 'Industrialrear yards along the west property line of the
subject property adjacent to Residential Districts shall be varied to
allow a twenty foot (201) rear yard for building subject to additional
landscaping installed, which shall be reviewed and meet requirements
of the Planning and Zoning Department;
(d) Section 14.2202.E which requires a ten foot (101) side and rear
yard shall be varied to permit two parking lots, or shared/common
drive of service/Loading facilities to abut, provided parking lot
landscaping shall ;be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Department;
(e) Section 14.2202.E which requires a forty foot (401) and a ten
foot (101) yard for parking and loading on the west property line of
the subject property shall be varied to permit a zero foot (01) yard
for loading and a ten foot (101) yard for parking subject to
additional landscaping installed, which landscaping plan shall meet
the requirements of the Planning and Zoning Department;
(f) Section 14.2202.E which requires a ten foot (101) side yard for
parking shall be varied to permit a five foot (51) side yard where two
parking lots abut;, provided there will be a minimum of ten feet (101)
landscape area between the two parking lots and the landscaping shall
be reviewed and meet the requirement of the Planning and Zoning
Department.
2. With respect to the property located in the I-1 Zoning District
the terms of Article XXII Section 14.2203, shall be varied so as to
permit:
(a) Section 14.2203.A which requires a four (4) acre minimum lot ara
shall be varied to permit a two (2) acre minimum lot area.
3. With respect to the property located in the I-1 Zoning District
the terms of Article XXII Section 14.3012.E shall be varied so as to
permits
(a) Section 14.3012.8 which requires a twelve foot by fifty foot (12'
x 501) loading space for building less; than forty thousand square feet
(40,000 sq. ft.) shall be varied to permit two (2) spaces twelve foot
by thirty-five feet (12' x 351) loading space for buildings over ten
thousand and less than thirty thousand square feet (30,000 sq. ft.) in
area subject to meeting the requirements of the:. Planning and Zoning
Department.
4. With respect to the property located in the 0-R Zoning District,
the terms of Section 14.2902.8:1 which requires a ten foot (101) side
yard shall be varied to permit two parking lots of shared/common drive
or service/loading facilities to abut, provided parking lot
landscaping shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning and Zoning
Department. Village Board action, willbe required for all requests.
PAGE TWO
Upon roll call: Ayes: Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon, Petrucelli,
O'May, Brettrager
Nayes: None
Abstain: Lannon
Mr. Lannon noted his abstention was due to his not being part of the
Zoning Board at the time of the prior approval.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
oRozmamCE NO.
AN 0aDzNu000 GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS LAKE CENTER PLAZA SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, The Alter Group (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from the following
provisions of Chapter 14 of the village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as Labe Center Plaza
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described on
Exhibits A a a attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof; and
wHmaoAG, the Petitioner seeks variations from the provisions
of Chapter 14, Section 14,2202,3'3, Section 14,2202.a,2, Section
14.2202'C.2, Section 14,2202.o, Section 14'2203.A, Section
14-2902.o'1, and Section 14'3012.a, said Sections relate to parking,
setbacks, loading, and lot size.
WeumEaG, a public hearing was held on the variations
requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 8-v-89 before the Zoning
Board of Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 26th
days of January, 1989, pursuant to doe and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 21st day of December,
1988/ and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its
findings and recommendation to the President and Board of
Trustees of the village of mount Prospect and the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the
variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the
standards set forth in Section 14,605 of Article VI -of Chapter 14 of
the village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would
be in the best interest of the Village to grant the variation as
specified herein.
NOW, Tg8aorOmo, BE IT 0Rouzmzo BY THE PRESIDENT AND Boono OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION �wo� The President and Board of Trustees of the
Village nf� ot hereby grant to the subject Property the
variations requested with respect to Chapter 14 as follows:
1. Section 14.3202'e.3 which requires a thirty foot (301) side yard
for interior lot lines in the z-1 District shall be varied to
allow a side yard of fifteen feet (151) plus one foot (11) for
every two feet (21) of building height above fifteen feet (15')'
subject to the staff review and approval of the length of
building;
o. Section 14,2202'B'2 which requires a forty foot (401) aide yard
for z-1 (Industrial) aide yards adjacent to Residential Districts
shall be varied to allow a thirty foot (]O') yard subject to
additional landscaping installed, which shall be reviewed and
meet requirements of the Department Planning and Zoning;
3. Section 14.2202.C.2 which requires a forty foot (401) rear yard
for I-1 Industrial rear yards along the west property line of the
Subject Property adjacent to Residential Districts shall be
varied to allow a twenty foot (201) rear yard for building
subject to additional landscaping installed, which shall be
reviewed and meet requirements of the eluooiog and Zoning
Department;
Zaa 8-v-89
Page z of z
4. Section 14.2202'E which requires a ten foot (101) side and
rear yard shall be varied to permit two parking lots, or
shared/common drive or service/loading facilities to abut,
provided parking lot landscaping shall be reviewed and approved
by the Planning and Zoning Department;
s. Section 14'2202'E which requires a forty coot (*O`) and a
ten foot (10') yard for parking and loading on the west property
line of the Subject Property obaII be varied to permit a zero
foot (U') yard for loading and a ten foot (10') yard for parking
subject to additional landscaping installed, which landscaping
plan shall meet the requirements of the nIaouiog and Zoning
Department;
6. Section 14.2202.E which requires a ten foot (10') side yard
for parking shall be varied to permit a five foot (51) side yard
where two parking lots abut; provided there will be a minimum of
ten feet (10') of landscaped area between the two parking lots
and the landscaping shall be reviewed and meet the requirements
of the Planning and Zoning Department.
Section 14.2303.a which requires a four (4) acre minimum lot area
shall be varied to permit a two (2) acre minimum lot area;
8^ Section 14'2903-B'1 which requires a five foot (5') side
yard for parking or shared/common drive or service/loading
facilities shall be varied to permit a yard sufficient to install
a landscape buffer, which shall meet the requirements of the
Planning and Zoning Department;
9- Section 14.3012.o which requires a twelve toot by fifty foot
(12' x 50') loading space for building less than forty thousand
square feet (40,000 ag.ft.) shall be varied to permit two (2)
spaces twelve foot by thirty-five feet (12` r ]5') loading space
for buildings over ten thousand (10,000 ag.ft) and less than
thirty thousand square feet (30,000 aq,ft-) in area, subject to
meeting the requirements of the Planning and Zoning Department.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all
other applicable ViIlage of Mount Prospect ordinances and Regulations shall
remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
8oCTzom FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of
Section 14,604 the variations being the subject of this Ordinance
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year of the passage of this Ordinance for any
portion of the property..
oEcTzom FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law,
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and AeeaovoD this day of , 1989.
Carolyn H. Krause
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
13
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
�--5--�k-,�
SUBJECT: ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89, MOUNT PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT
LOCATION: 420 WEST DEMPSTER ST. - DEMPSTER DEVELOPMENT CENTER
DATE: FEBRUARY 16, 1989
The Mount Prospect Park District is requesting both a text
amendment and a variation to the Zoning Code. The Text Amendment
will change the parking space requirements from 10 per thousand
square feet of floor area to 5 per thousand square feet of floor-
area
loorarea for the following uses: Recreational facilities, convention
halls, dance halls, skating rinks, assembly halls, gymnasiums,
bowling alley, arcades, health club, and indoor swimming pools (not
including locker rooms) . Also included in this amendment is a new
requirement for outdoor swimming pools of one space per 75 square
feet of water area.
A variation is also requested to allow a 38 foot height for a small
portion of the building. The Code allows a maximum of 24 feet in
a residential district. This case was presented to the Zoning
Board of Appeals on February 9, 1989.
The Park District addressed the text amendment issue first. They
had conducted studies of the parking provisions for other
recreational facilities in the suburban area and found that the 5
per thousand proposed for the Dempster Development Center would be
more than adequate. Because this center will be a mixed use
recreational facility, the building will typically operate at
capacity during the winter months when athletic fields are not in
use. The opposite is true in the summer when the athletic fields
are used to capacity and the building is not. Providing 5 parking
spaces per thousand square feet as proposed for the building and
the additional spaces required by Code for the outdoor fields will,
in the Park District's opinion, be more than adequate.
Village staff concurred with the Park District that the current
requirement of 10 spaces per thousand square feet for these type
uses is excessive. After surveys made of other town's ordinances
in regards to these uses and also a review of the Park District's
study, the staff feels comfortable in amending the text.
John F. Dixon - Page 2
ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
February 16, 1989
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed text amendment
at length and voiced concerns with the reduction of spaces provided
for some of the uses outlined in the amendment, such as, bowling
alley, skating rink, dance halls, convention centers and assembly
halls. Some of the Board members expressed the opinion that those
uses should stay at the 10 per thousand square feet requirement.
Based on this concern, and further research, the staff recommends
that ten per 1,000 remain as the parking requirement for assembly
halls, convention halls, dance halls and skating rinks. Several
members of the Zoning Board also believed a parking variation for
the Park District might be preferable to a text amendment.
The second request by the Park District is a variation pertaining
to the building height for a small portion of the building. The
Park District representatives stated that a gymnastics space was
to be located on the second floor and requires a higher than normal
ceiling. For this reason, a 38 foot height is proposed. The
remainder of the building will be 32 feet to accommodate a higher
gymnasium ceiling among other uses. The fact that this building
is to be located adjacent to a commercial building (Venture Store)
and quite a distance away from any residential minimizes any impact
on the neighborhood. Staff concurred with the Park District on the
building height variation. The Zoning Board had no objection with
the building height variation request.
Mr. Stecker, a concerned resident, was present to voice his
objections to the height variation. He also was of the opinion
that the Zoning Board did not have sufficient information, such as,
staff comments on the building plans in order to arrive at a
decision. The staff responded to Mr. Stecker's concern stating
that the details on the actual building are being discussed and
will be resolved before permits are issued.
The Zoning Board voted 4-3 to approve the text amendment in its
proposed format. Mr. Cassidy, Lannon and Petrucelli voted nay and
reasoned that the proposed parking for the Dempster Development
Center seemed to be adequate, but they had concerns with similar
type uses in the future. They felt the Park District should
request a variation. The height variation was approved unanimously
7-0.
PB:hg
APPROVED: p
David M. Clements, Director
Planning and Zoning Dept.
MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL 14EETXNG OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-3-A-89
Hearing Date: February 9, 1989
and ZBA-4-V-88
PETITIONER:
Mount Prospect Park District
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
Dempster Development Center
420 West Dempster Street
PUBLICATION DATE:
January 9, 1989
REQUEST:
The Mount Prospect Park District
is requesting both a text amendment
and a variation to the Zoning Code.
The Text Amendment is to Section
14.3012 to change the parking space
requirements from 10 per thousand
square feet of floor area to 5 per
thousand square feet of floor area
for the following uses: Recreational
facilities, convention halls, dance
halls, skating rinks, assembly
halls, gymnasiums, bowling alley,
arcades, health club, and indoor
swimming pools (not including
locker rooms). Also included in
this revised text is a new
requirement for outdoor swimming
pools of one space per 75 square
feet of water area. Variation
requested from Section 14.1104.A
to allow a 381 maximum building
height instead of 241 allowed by
Code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Len Petrucelli
INTERESTED PARTIES: Joseph Stecker, 1602 Willow
Mr. Basnik introduced the next agenda item being the Mount Prospect
Park Dittrict's request for text amendment to permit 5 parking
spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area rather than 10
spaces per 1,000 square feet of floor area for a recreational
center, and a building height variation to allow a 38 foot building
in an R-1 District.
Case No. ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 2 of 5
Mr. Walter Cook introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated
he is superintendent of recreation for the Park District. He
stated the District plans to demolish the existing Dempster
Development Center and construct'a new recreation facility at this
location. Mr. Cook introduced Project Architect, John Vaci. Mar.
Vaci stated that the proposed facility is an 83,000 square foot
recreational building. With a mounted site plan he; oriented the
Zoning Board to the development and surrounding properties. He
stated that the Venture "Store is located to the east,' the
commonwealth Edison easement to the north, and Park District open
space and baseball diamonds to the west. He stated considering
these surrounding uses, the minor building height variation should
not have an adverse effect on adjoining properties.
The architect presented a mounted floor plan that depicted the
interior layout' of the multi -use building. He stated that the
building consists of an indoor swimming pool, gymnasium, exercise
areas, handball" courts, child care, and administrative offices.
He also noted that a significant portion of this site is devoted
to outdoor' recreation uses, such as, baseball diamonds. Mr. Vasi
stated that in summer months, when there is peak use of the
baseball diamonds, there are fewer 'people using the recreation
building and that in peak' winter months, with heavy use of the
recreation building, there'is no use of the baseball diamonds and
outdoor facilities. He stated that, with this type of seasonal use
of the property, there is never a large demand on the parking from
both uses. He also stated that within the interior of the
building, if you examine each use individually, the present 10
spaces per thousand is excessive'. The architect• stated that users
of the facility will, for example, first use the locker, then move
to the swimming pool or the gymnasium and use different parts of
the building and that there is never a constant heavy demand in any
part of the building. He stated that examining each use of the
building individually, the Park District arrived at a number of 5
spaces per 1,000 meeting actual demand. He indicated that the Park
District is trying to provide reasonable parking for users and that
5 spaces per 1,000 will meet their anticipated heaviest use. He
indicated that the District could pave and provide additional
parking in the future if there does prove to be a parking deficit,
but that he believes 5 spaces per 1,000 is sufficient for the use
of a building of this size.
As a further example, he; mentioned the day care center and the
office area of; the building and stated' that, if these were
calculated` individually, they would require 4 spaces per 1,000 and
that providing 10 spaces per 1,000 for the office and the day care
was not reasonable and provided an over -abundance of parking for
these limited use areas in the facility.
Case No. ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 3 of 5
Mr. Vaci also referred back to the building height variation and
stated that the location of the new building provides increased
setbacks over the existing building, and that this leads to more
open space, and green area on the site. He specifically noted that
the 38 foot building height is attributable to a second level
gymnastics area in one of the gymnasiums.
Mr. Bednar then addressed the Zoning Board and stated that the
request was solely for the purposes of a text amendment for parking
and the building height variation, and that the Park District was
not applying for any zoning change to permit development of the
facility. Mr. Bednar stated the staff looked at each use within
the recreational building and calculated the requirement for each
use, and that by examining the proposal in this fashion, the staff
found that 10 spaces per 1,000 provided an excessive amount of
parking on the site. Mr. Bednar indicated that the staff looked
at Zoning Ordinances from other suburban municipalities and looked
at the parking for similar recreational facilities, and found that
other communities administer parking requirements substantially
less than 10 per 1,000. Mr. Bednar admitted that the 10 per 1,000
requirement was from the new parking section of the Zoning
Ordinance adopted only in the last year, and that this requirement
was more of an educated guess to be conservative, should there be
a need in the community to construct a new recreational facility.
In reference to the building height, Mr. Bednar stated that the
small portion of the building with a 38 foot height would have no
impact on surrounding properties.
Chairman Basnik then asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Joe
Stecker of 1602 Willow Lane objected to the building height as
presented to the Zoning Board, and made reference to what he
believed was an inconsistency in the plans reviewed by the Zoning
Board. He stated that he believed the plans should be revised to
properly depict the section of the building with a 38 foot building
height. Mr. Stecker stated that he believed the parking provided
for, the building was sufficient but he had concerns about the
limited points of access from the site. Mr. Stecker also stated
that the Zoning Board did not have sufficient information to act
on the request, and that there was no site engineering or comments
from the Fire Department as to access on maneuverability.
Case No. ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 4 of 5
Mr. Bednar stated that many of these details, referred to by Mr.
Stecker were subject to specific Code requirements and permit
issuance, and that the Park District had conversations ongoing with
Village staff for over a year about development of this site. He
indicated that many of the; items referred to by Mr. Stecker would
be reviewed by staff at the time permits are applied for.
Mr. Vasi gave a summary of the driveway design and automobile
circulation on, site, and stated that one main driveway is
designated for the property to limit access onto Dempster Street,
and to provide proper automobile stacking on site to avoid
congestion on the adjoining public street.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it
was noted that the 38 foot building height was a minor variation,
and would have no effect on adjoining; properties. The Zoning Board
then looked at the merits of the text amendment for the change of
parking requirement and, noted that a text amendment might not be
appropriate for this case. Members of the Zoning Board believed
that the parking provided at the Dempster Development Center was
sufficient for Park District use, but that perhaps a variation to
the existing requirement might be a better way to proceed. Members
of the Zoning Board thought that a text amendment might set a
precedent for future development in the community which may not
have sufficient parking.
Messrs. Bednar and Clements stated that the staff was recommending
a text amendment simply because the current requirement of 10 per
1,000 in the Ordinance seemed excessive, once a recreation
facility, such as the Park District proposal, was ,examined in great
detail. The staff stated that 10 per 1,000 was excessive, and that
they were uncomfortable with the requirement in the Zoning
Ordinance that required parking way beyond what was necessary'.
Messrs. Bednar and Clements stated that staff had examined
available parking at similar recreational facilities and other
suburban ordinances,, and this confirmed that the parking
requirement of the Zoning Ordinance was inappropriate and that.
parking at the Dempster Center was sufficient for the proposed use:.
Zoning Board members indicated a, preference for variation but felt
like requiring the Park District to refile for variation might
place a hardship on their anticipated May 1st start of
construction. Mr. Basnik stated that., if the staff was comfortable
with a text amendment, then he believed that sufficient thought and
work went into the proposal, and that he did not believe a
precedent for future development under the new requirement of 5 per
1,000, would cause a hardship for the community."
Case No. ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
Page 5 of 5
Members of the Zoning Board believed that a variation might be
better as the case could be considered on its own merits but
indicated there was a reluctance to slow the process down for the
Park District. Accordingly, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion at the
request.
Mrs. O'May moved that the Zoning Board approve a text amendment to
reduce parking from 10 spaces per 1,000 to 5 spaces per 1,000 for
the category of a Recreation Center as defined in the Zoning
Ordinance. Motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon roll call: AYES: Brothers, O'May, Brettrager and Basnik
NAYS: Cassidy, Lannon and Petrucelli
The motion was approved by a vote of 4-3. Messrs. Cassidy, Lannon
and Petrucelli voted in opposition to the request indicating a
preference to vary the parking requirement rather than to approve
a text amendment.
Mr. Basnik then asked for a motion on the building height
variation. Mr. Cassidy moved that a 38 foot building height be
approved. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Brothers.
Upon roll call: AYES: Brothers, O'May, Brettrager, Cassidy,
Lannon, Petrucelli and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried.
David M. Clements,
Recording Secretary
Villeg's of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEA CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER"'
SUBJECT: ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89, MOUNT PROSPECT PARK DISTRICT
LOCATION: 420 WEST DEMPSTER ST. - DEMPSTER DEVELOPMENT CENTER
DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1989
REQUEST
The Mount Prospect Park District is requesting both a text
amendment and a variation to the Zoning Code. The Text Amendment -
is to Section 14.3012 to change the parking space requirements from
10 per thousand square feet of floor area to 5 per thousand square
feet of floor area for the following uses: Recreational
facilities, convention halls, dance halls, skating rinks, assembly
halls, gymnasiums, bowling alley, arcades, health club, and indoor
swimming pools (not including locker rooms) . Also included in this
revised text is a new requirement for outdoor swimming pools of one
space per 75 square feet of water area.
A variation is requested from Section 14.1104 to allow a maximum
building height of 38 feet for a gymnasium building instead of 24
feet which is the maximum height requirement in an R-1 Single
Family District. The existing Dempster Development Center is
slated for demolition and will be replaced with a larger facility.
VILLAGE STAFF 9O ,NTS
Most of the comments submitted by Village staff were pertaining to
specific engineering requirements that are necessary before
building permits are issued. These comments have no bearing on
this text amendment and variation request. Comments that are
important to the requests are as follows:
1. All height requirements must conform to the BOCA height and
area codes.
2. Once the final floor plans of the building and outside
recreational areas are determined, a parking study should be
done.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
February 2, 1989
3. The Park District should make themselves aware of all
Development Code requirements including street lights on
Dempster Street.
Also attached to this memo is a list of specific engineering
concerns which must be addressed before permits are issued.
PLANNING AND ZONING_COMMEXTS
The most important issue proposed by the Park District is the text
amendment. During the past six months we've had several meetings
with the Park District representatives. We have reviewed studies
of parking provisions for other recreation centers in the suburban
area; and also the parking requirements for recreational facilities
from other communities. It is apparent after reviewing these
studies that the Dempster Development Center will provide more
parking per square foot of building area than any of the others.
Similar type mixed-use recreation facilities in other communities
typically have the building operating at capacity during the winter
months when the athletic fields are not used. The opposite is true
in the summer when the athletic fields are used to capacity and the
building is not. With this type of situation, parking lots can be
shared between users. Also, the current parking requirement
(10/1000 sq. ft.) is for all uses within the building, such as,
locker rooms, exercise areas, gymnasiums, and pool facilities.
Individuals will first use the locker room before moving to other
areas of the building. It is perhaps not reasonable to require ten
spaces per 1,000 feet of floor area for the total facility, as
individuals will be using a variety of areas within the building.
It is for these reasons that we are comfortable with the proposed
parking requirements by the Park District.
Our current parking requirement of ten spaces per thousand, square
feet was adopted as part of the off-street parking section
recently. Admittedly, this requirement has not been tested and
the current ratio of ten spaces per thousand square feet was an
educated guess on our part. We do not foresee a problem with the
new requirements as proposed. In addition, these type of uses are
very rare in town and we may not see another such proposal in the
near future.
The second request by the Park District is a variation from the
Zoning Code pertaining to building height in the Single Family
District. This property is zoned R-1 Single Family, however, it
is presently" the site of an old school building (Dempster Junior
High School) which is now the Dempster Development Center. The
Venture Shopping Center is located directly to the east of this
parcel, multi -family three flats are located directly west on
Dempster, Commonwealth Edison right-of-way is directly north of the
Gil Basnik - Page 3
ZBA-3-A-89, ZBA-4-V-89
February 2, 1989
property, and both business and apartment buildings are located
south of Dempster Street. The Park District is requesting a 38
foot building height for a small portion of the new building. Most
of the new building is to be 32 feet high. Code only allows a 24
foot height in a single family residential district.
As indicated on the site plan, the proposed building is located
towards the east end of the property close to the Venture building.
The closest residential buildings are approximately 300 feet to the
west. Understandably, the gymnasium requires a higher ceiling than
the normal single family home, therefore, a height between 32 and
38 feet is appropriate for a gymnasium. Considering the fact that
the Venture Department Store is located only 80 feet away from this
building and is of a similar height, and also considering that the
building is set back quite a distance from any nearby residential
areas, we do not foresee a negative impact resulting from this
extra building height. Any minimal impacts upon the surrounding
area can be minimized by using adequate and mature landscaping to
scale down the building height.
In summary, the Park District has two separate requests before you.
First, the text amendment, in our opinion is a fair proposal. Five
spaces per 1,000 square foot of building should be adequate not
only for this specific site but for any similar use in the future.
As indicated on the site plan, there' is more than the required 5
spaces per thousand square feet indicated in the first phase of
this parking lot. If parking shortages should occur, there is also
room for future parking to the west. However, we do not anticipate
this happening. The variation request for building height is
appropriate for a gymnasium building. Because of the location of
the taller building, we do not anticipate a negative impact on the
adjacent residential properties, however, a condition of good
adequate mature landscaping on site will help minimize any impact.
PB: hg
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
13
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89, LOUIS BOSCO
LOCATION: 1796 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (WATERFALL RESTAURANT)
DATE: FEBRUARY 15., 1989
The applicant is requesting a rezoning from B-3 to B-4 and a
special use in order to allow a drive-through, fast-food restaurant
facility for the property at 1796 South Elmhurst Road. Variations
are also requested from the parking lot setback requirements in
order to allow a zero foot setback along the south property line
instead of 10 feet, and a nine foot setback, as amended, along
Elmhurst Road instead of 30 feet. This case was heard by the
Zoning Board of Appeals on both January 26 and February 9.
Mr. Bosco would like to remodel the existing restaurant building
and re -open as a fast food "Mr. Beef and Pizza" with a drive -up
window. He currently operates two similar restaurants, one on
Arlington Heights Road. Also proposed for a small portion of this
building is a video store. As stated the B-4 rezoning is required
only because of the drive-thru facility of the restaurant. The
property is currently surrounded by B-4, I-1, or O/R Zoning
Districts. Mr. Bosco also proposes to retain the current zero foot
setback along the south property line, adjoining the Shell Car
Wash, and 9 foot instead of 30 foot along Elmhurst Road. The staff
commented that a 9 foot setback along Elmhurst Road could be
accommdated without the loss of any more parking spaces.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the rezoning of this property
and expressed concern for possible future uses allowed in a B-4
District, such as, automobile sales or service station. They
requested staff and Village Attorney to review options to safeguard
such undesirable uses in the future. On February 9, staff
presented two options to the Board. The first option identified
was a text amendment to create a special use for a drive-thru
restaurant in a B-3 District; thus eliminating the need for
rezoning this parcel to B-4 classification. It was staff's opinion
that this option would lead to additional requests for drive-thru
facilities and may not be desirable.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
February 16, 1989
ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89,
ZBA-7-V-89
The second option discussed was a condition attached to a B-4
rezoning and special use that stipulates a reversion to B-3, should
the restaurant cease to operate at this location. This option
would be possible and would be favored of the two options
discussed. Of course, the original request to rezone this parcel
to B-4 without such conditions is the other alternative.
The Zoning Board of Appeals, after discussing the pros and cons of
each option decided that a B-4 zoning designation on this parcel
is appropriate. The Board then voted unanimously 7-0 to approve
the rezoning to B-4, the special use permit for a drive-thru
facility, and a zero foot setback variation on the south property
line, 9 foot.setback along the Elmhurst Road property line with an
appropriate landscape buffer to be approved by staff.
PB: hg
APPROVED:
I)W M. C'L4�
David M. Clements, Director
of Planning and Zoning
MINUTES OF THE
SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. ZBA-5-Z-89
Hearing Date: February 9, 1989
ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89
PETITIONER:
Louis Bosco
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1796 S. Elmhurst Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
January 9, 1989
REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting a
rezoning from B-3 to B-4 and a
special use in order to allow a
drive-through, fast-food restaurant
facility. Variations are also
requested from Section 14.2102.E
to allow a zero foot parking lot
setback from the south property
line instead of 10 feet as required
by Code, and a zero foot parking
lot setback from Elmhurst Road
right-of-way instead of 30 feet as
required by code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Ronald Cassidy
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Len Petrucelli
INTERESTED PARTIES:
Mr. Basnik introduced this request to the Zoning Board and stated
that the case was originally heard at the meeting of January 26 and
continued to allow the staff to meet with the Village Attorney to
discuss alternatives to the proposed B-4 Zoning.
Mr. Bednar addressed the Zoning Board and gave a summary of the
request, and stated that the petitioner would like to rezone the
property from the present B-3 District to a B-4 District to allow
a drive-thru window for a fast food restaurant. Mr. Bednar stated
that the Zoning Board had asked the staff to meet with the
-attorney, to determine if a condition could be attached to this
approval to rescind the B-4 zoning if the restaurant were to close,
or in the alternate, if a text amendment could be processed placing
a special use for a drive-thru restaurant in a B-3 District.
Case No ZBA-5-Z-89,
ZBA-6-SU-89 ZBA-7-V-89
Page 2 of'' 3
Mr. Bednar stated that the attorney and staff believe that a text
amendment to B-3 zoning would not be appropriate, as this could
conceivably lead to an increased, number,of drive-thru requests in
a B-3District. Mr`. Bednar stated that a B-3 District is more
retail and service oriented and that it might not be appropriate
to encourage drive-thru facilities in this zoning classification.
Mr. Bednar stated that the attorney recommended that, if the Zoning
Board were to approve the request with a B-4 zoning, that they do
so with a condition :that a map: amendment be undertaken, if the
restaurant were to close, and that the property be rezoned to B-3.
Mr. Cassidy stated that he was concerned about the ability of the
Village to monitor such a rezoning, should the restaurant close.
Mr. Bednar stated that the ordinance authorizing a special use
would be recorded and would be 'referenced on a title report, and
the condition for the rezoning would become part of the title.
Mr. Petrucelli stated that he had considered the matter since the
last meeting and felt that, at this time, perhaps the B-4 zoning
would be appropriate. He stated that he did not believe the
restaurant would have an adverse effect on adjoining properties,
and that there was no negative 'impact with the drive-thru window
as proposed. He stated that the drive-thru window is designed with
adequate stacking, maneuvering and traffic flow and that, perhaps
an approval with the 3-4 zoning would be appropriate. He did not
believe a condition to rezone the property would be in the best
interest of the Village.
Mr. Cassidy stated that uses surrounding the location are more
intense and have either a B-4 zoning classification or an office
research or industrial district classification. He stated that it
might be reasonable to rezone this property B-4 to be compatible
with adjoining zoning classifications
Mr. Lannon stated that; the Shell Station to the south is zoned
B-4 and that the subject -property is an island of B-3 °zoning,
surrounded by more 'intensive zoning districts. He stated that the
zoning map should be changed to eliminate this isolated B-3
District. Mr. Brettrager stated that Lake Center Plaza had
indicated a concern to the B-4 zoning, and the potential of future
uses in that district having an adverse effect on their office -
research development. Mr. Brettrager believed that Lake Center
Plaza is more intense than tine 'proposed restaurant, and did not
believe comments by this adjoining property owner were justified.
Case No. ZBA-5-Z-89,
ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89
Page 3 of 3
Mr. Bednar then gave a summary of the side yard variations
requested with this application. He stated that the side yard
request is to allow a zero foot parking lot setback instead of 10
feet on the south property line, and a zero foot setback on
Elmhurst Road instead of 30 feet as required by Code.
The petitioner indicated that a 9 foot setback could be provided
for a front yard.
Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon
moved that the Zoning Board rezone the property from a B-3 District
to a B-4 District.
Upon roll call: AYES: Cassidy, O'May, Brothers, Brettrager,
Petrucelli, Lannon and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Basnik then asked for a motion on the Special Use Permit for
a drive-thru window. Mrs. Brothers moved that the Zoning Board
approve the Special use Permit for a drive-thru window. Mrs. O'May
seconded the motion.
Upon roll call: AYES: Cassidy, O'May, Brothers, Brettrager,
Petrucelli, Lannon and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Basnik then asked for a motion on the two side yard variations,
including a zero foot setback on the south line and a 9 foot front
setback. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board approve the zero
foot variation on the south property line and 9 foot variation on
the east property line. Mr. Brettrager seconded the motion.
Upon roll call: AYES: Cassidy, O'May, Brothers, Brettrager,
Petrucelli, Lannon and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried.
David M. Clements,
Recording Secretary
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
Cht1
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN VA(
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89, LOUIS BOSCO
LOCATION: 1796 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (WATERFALL RESTAURANT)
DATE: FEBRUARY 2, 1989
At the request of the Zoning Board of Appeals, this case was
continued to the special meeting of February 9 for the staff to
obtain an opinion from the village Attorney on the rezoning and
special use aspects of the petition.
You might recall that the major concern of this application was the
rezoning to a B-4 District, and future uses of the property should
the petitioner's restaurant close. Several members of the Zoning
Board, and representatives of the Alter Group, felt that perhaps
a B-4 use such as automobile sales or a service station might have
an adverse effect on surrounding properties.
The Planning and Zoning staff and Village attorney reviewed the two
alternatives below:
1. Amend the R -a
The special use category for a drive-thru restaurant is found
in the B-4 District as this is the zoning district
characterized by more intense retail, service, and automobile
oriented uses. This is the proper zoning district for a
drive-thru restaurant, due to its unique needs for access,
maneuverability, parking and automobile stacking in the drive-
thru lane. The B-3 District is designed as more of a
specialty retail and service district, with many prohibited
uses that are more intense in nature, that generate higher
levels of automobile and truck traffic, similar to a drive-
thru restaurant.
The Village Attorney stated that this is a reasonable
distinction of zoning districts, and that it is not
recommended that the zoning text be amended to meet the needs
of an individual petitioner. Further, there appears to be
concern in the community for an increasing number of drive-
Gil Basnik - Page 2
February 2, 1989
ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89
thru restaurants, and creating such a Special Use in the B-3
District would lead to additional requests filed for Zoning
Board consideration. This could make the job of the Zoning
Board even harder, when considering the sensitive nature of
such applications.
The Village Attorney stated that reasonable conditions can be
attached to a Special Use request. One such condition could
be that the Zoning Board convene a public hearing to rezone
the property to its original B-3 classification, should any
restaurant cease to operate at this location. This would be
justified,based on findings of fact that if the B-4 zoning
were to remain, there would be an adverse effect on
surrounding properties.
The staff and Village Attorney recommend alternative 2 as this is
the most desirable way to approve the request, without a text
amendment that could conceivably permit drive-thru restaurants in
many more locations than presently allowed.
DMC: hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE 5-Z-89, 6 -SU -89,
Hearing Date: January 26, 1989
7-V-89
PETITIONER:
Louis Bosco
PUBLICATION DATE:
December 21, 1988
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1796 South Elmhurst Road
(The Old Waterfall Restaurant)
REQUEST:
Rezoning from B-3 to B-4 and a
special use permit in order to allow
a drive-through, fast-food
restaurant at this location. Also
requested is a variation from
Section 14.2102.E to allow a zero
foot parking lot setback instead of
10 feet on the south property lot
line. The zero foot parking lot
setback from the Elmhurst Road
right-of-way instead of 30 feet as
required by Code is also requested.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Marilyn O'May
Robert Brettrager
The Alter Group
Mr. John Buzzyani, 2035 South Arlington Heights Road, Arlington
Heights, attorney for the Petitioner, stated that the current building
was operated as a sit-down restaurant, was unsuccessful and finally
closed. The building is now vacant and unused. His client would like
to reopen this as a fast food restaurant with a drive -up in one part
of the building with a video store adjoining. To accomplish this, the
property must be rezoned from B-3 to B-4, thus allowing the drive
through window. This would be compatible with adjoining property
which is currently zoned B-4, I-1 or O -R. He noted that the
restaurant would provide a need to the community. The side lot and
front setback variations are necessary to accommodate additional
parking to meet Code requirements. Occupancy of this property would
generate sales tax for the Village and employment opportunites for
15-20 people in the community.
Paul Bednar, Planner, indicated that B-3 zoning will allow a
multitude of uses, including, but not limited to, sit-down and
fast-food restaurants. This property has been vacant since the summer
of 1988. The Waterfall Restaurant was operated as a sit-down
restaurant, and as such, a significant amount of parking was provided.
The Petitioner, is proposing to operate a fast-food, drive-through
restaurant along with a small video rental `shop. In order to do so,
the property must be rezoned from B-3 to B-4 and a special use permit
for the drive-through is required. A determination is necessary on
whether B-4 zoning is appropriate for this site. If redeveloped in
the future, the B-4 zoning would remain, allowing for uses such as
automobile service and sales.
A determination must also be made as to whether a drive-through
facility for this restaurant is appropriate for this location. A
review of the site plan did not forsee any significant traffic impact.
No new curb -cuts are proposed for Elmhurst Road.
Existing building, location makes it difficult to meet the yard
setbacks on the south and east property lines. With the proposed
one-way traffic flow on the Elmhurst Road frontage, the aisle width
should be 17' which leaves approximately 9 feet of area that could be
landscaped near the property line. The only way the set -back can be
increased along the south line is ;to change the two-way traffic flow
to one-way, possibly causing more problems than it salves.
A possible conditionfor the Board to consider is approval of two-way
access drives as proposed with a review at a later date, and if
necessary, establishment of one-way drives if problems arise..
Mr. Lawrence Friedman, 77 W. Washington, Chicago, attorney for the
Lake Center Plaza, stated his concerns with the property being rezoned
B-4 and being faced with possible detrimental future uses. A text
amendment was suggested. There would be no objection to the
restaurant if the zoning was properly structured.
Dave Clements, Director of Planning and zoning, indicated his concerns
with a text amendment. B-3 zoning is more neighborhood business
oriented while B-4 is more commercial corridor oriented. Rezoning
from B-3 to B-4 with a condition that future owners have to come
before the Board fora review before occupying the premise could be a
better solution.
Mr. Lannon stated that he did not ,see a place better suited for B-4
zoning than this property.
Mr. Petrucelli objected to the fact that no traffic study had been
submitted for review.
Ms. Brothers did not feel that traffic was the issue, but rather did
the area need another fast-food restaurant.
Mr. Bednar stated that the Engineering Department studied the traffic
impact and believes that the southern access might be better if
designated as an exit only, and the northern access an entrance only.
However, they would like to see how the two-way access drives will
work.
Louis Bosco, 1126 North Delphia, Park Ridge, Petitioner, indicated
that he did not care how the traffic flowed as long as the
drive-through was permitted.
Mr. Basnik, Mr. Cassidy, and Mr. Petrucelli all voiced concerns over
the rezoning to B-4. Mr. Lannon and Mr. Brettrager were in favor of
the rezoning.
Mr. Bednar stated that the B-4 zoning is proposed and if a text
amendment is decided upon, than the case must be republished.
Mr. Friedman of the Alter Group echoed Mr. Bednar's comment. He
suggested that the property be rezoned with a condition that it revert
back to B-3 unless the new owners appear before the Zoning Board.
After discussion between the Board and Petitioner, the case was
continued to February 9 at 8:00 p.m. to allow for review of a text
amendment and to get an opinion from the Village attorney. It was
noted that the Petitioner is under time constraints with contracts.
Eileen M. Reinhard
Recording Secretary
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BASNIX, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89, LOUIS BOSCO
LOCATION: 1796 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (WATERFALL RESTAURANT)
DATE: JANUARY 19,1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting a rezoning from B-3 to B-4 and a
special use in order to allow a drive-through, fast-food restaurant
facility. Variations are also requested from Section 14.2102.13 to
allow a zero foot parking lot setback from the south property line
instead of 10 feet as required by Code, and a zero foot parking lot
setback from Elmhurst Road right-of-way instead of 30 feet as
required by Code.
1. The Inspection Services Department believes that the
southern access might be better if designated as an exit only,
and the north access an entrance only. It would be agreeable
to them to allow the two-way access drives as they exist and
monitor and traffic conflicts as they occur. If problems
arise, the one-way drive could then be striped as such.
2. IDOT permits will be required for any alteration of the
curb -cuts.
3. The Engineering Department notes that a grading plan will
be required to determine the outflow of drainage. Storm water
detention might be required for any new impervious surfaces.
5. The petitioner should make himself aware of all
Development Code requirements.
5. Building permits will be required for all work done on the
building including any remodelling.
6. It should be known that the Village is holding a cash
escrow from the previous owner guaranteeing certain
improvements.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
January 19, 1989
ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89t ZBA-7-V-89
BACKGROUND
This property is currently zoned B-3. The Zoning designation will
allow a multitude of uses, including but not limited to, sit-down
and fast-food restaurants. A vacant restaurant building
(previously The Waterfall Restaurant) is located on this property.
This building has been vacant since the summer of 1988. The
Waterfall Restaurant was operated as a sit-down restaurant. A
significant amount of parking, above and beyond Code requirements,
was provided on this site for this sit-down restaurant.
Mr. Bosco, the applicant, proposes to remodel the existing
building and operate a "Mr. Beef & Pizza" fast-food, drive-through
restaurant along with a small video rental shop. In order to do
so, the property must be rezoned from B-3 to B-4 and a special use
permit for the drive-through restaurant will be required. In
addition to the request for rezoning and special use, variations
to the parking lot setbacks are also requested.
This property is adjacent to the new Shell Gas Mart/Car Wash to the
south (zoned B-4), and the Lake Center Plaza Development to the
north and west (zoned I-1 and O -R).
PLANNING AND ZONINg COMMENTS
The Zoning Board of Appeals must first determine whether the
rezoning request to B-4 is appropriate for this site. As indicated
above, the surrounding parcels are compatibly zoned. The B-4 zoning
request is only necessary since the drive-through window is only
allowed as a Special use in the B-4 District. If in the future,
this property was to be redeveloped, the B-4 zoning would remain,
permitting uses not allowed in a B-3 District, such as, automobile
service and sales.
Another important consideration of this request is the validity of
the special use application. The Board must decide whether a
drive-through facility for this restaurant is appropriate on this
property. We have reviewed the site plan for traffic flow, both
on-site and off-site and can foresee no significant problems
resulting from this plan. No new curb -cuts are proposed for
Elmhurst Road.
-The third component of this request has to do with the parking -lot
setbacks from both Elmhurst Road and the south property line.
Essentially, Mr. Bosco is requesting to use the existing parking
lot setbacks along the south.property line and east property line.
All other zoning Code requirements, including the yards setbacks,
parking provided, stacking spaces for the drive-through window and
loading zone have been provided.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
January 19, 1989
ZBA-5-Z-89, ZBA-6-SU-89, ZBA-7-V-89
The existing building location makes it difficult to meet the yard
setbacks on the south and, east property line to the fullest extent.
However, with the proposed one-way traffic flow on the Elmhurst
Road frontage, the aisle width should be 17' which leaves
approximately 9 feet of area that can be landscaped along the
property line. This 9 foot setback would be acceptable considering
the site constraints and is much more desirable than a zero foot
setback. The only way the setback can be increased along the south
property line is to change the two-way traffic flow to one-way.
This option may create more problems than it solves.
In summary, the Board must first consider the rezoning request.
The adjacent parcels of land are compatible with a B-4 Zoning
District. Secondly, the special use request for the drive-through
facility must be considered. As proposed, the site plan does not
indicate that there will be significant traffic problems either on-
site or off-site as a result of the drive-thru. We expect no more
of a traffic impact from this proposal than from a successful sit-
down restaurant. Lastly, the petitioner must establish a hardship
for the two variations requested. There are alternative layouts
such as a one-way traffic pattern and a narrower aisle width along
Elmhurst Road that will reduce the variations. The Board should
consider a condition be made part of any approval that the two-way
driveways be reviewed at a later date. If traffic conflicts are
apparent, one-way driveways should be established.
PB:hg
Village of Mc"nt Prospect �
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director
DATE: February 16, 1989
SUBJECT: Audit Proposals
On February 9, 1989, the Finance Commission reviewed the information on Audit
Proposals which had been previously provided to the Village 8ourd, Their
recommendation is that the Village accept the proposal from Karrison & Byrne.
The discussion on the proposals focused on the advantages and disadvantages of
o local firm compared to a national firm. Commissioners 8ac»»uuer and
5milenic stated they thought e national firm would bring e new perspective to
the Village's audit, They cited a broader range of governmental and xvoineoo
experience and greater firm resources. Commissioner Hallman stated that he
did not think we oxuulu change from o firm who has given good service to the
Village. Commissioner Davies stated that he had o number of friends who had
worked for national firms, or the "nig Eight" firms, and he did not think we
would get as good service from them as from e local firm. Commissioner Poxras
stated that through his work in the Illinois Controller's Office, he has had
contact with xarriaun a Byrne as well as most or the Big sight accounting
firma. He stated that Kaccioon & Byrne has been much more'responsive than the
national firms.
The recommendation to accept the proposal from Korriaon & Byrne was approved
by a three to two vote. The Commissioners also recommended that the audit and
management letter be reviewed thoroughly.
I concur with the recommendation of the Finance Commission, and I am reques-
ting that the Village Board accept the Proposal for Auditing sozvivea from
��~�K � �J� ��
Village ��^ ^-~L��� prospect _
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Directo <t�l
DATE: February J, 1989
5V8J[CT; Audit Proposals
For the past six yeare. Karcison and Byrne, Certified Public Accountants, have
provided independent audits of the Village's annual financial statements.
Their audit work has been highly professional and during this time they have
provided other valuable services to the Village as well. They have performed
special accounting work for certain Village Water accounts and the Village's
Old Special Assessment Funds and they were instrumental in helping the Village
obtain the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting
from the Government Finance Officers Association.
In prior years, the Village has had a policy of formally soliciting audit
proposals from CPA firms every four Lb six years. Based upon this practice we
recently submitted p Request for Proposal (RFP) for Auditing Services from
eleven CPA firms. Because or the quality of work performed by Karrioon and
Byrne over the past six years, we included them in the firma that were invited
to submit proposals. In addition to Korrisnn and Byrne, one other local firm
was included, one regional firm and eight national firma commonly called the
"Big Eight." From the eleven invitations to submit proposals, we receive*
seven proposals.
Auditing responsibilities have increased very significantly over the past five
years, and I had expected this factor to have a marked effect on our audit
foos, During this time period, the Federal government has imposed the require-
ments of the Single Audit Act on any governmental unit receiving $100,000 or
more in Federal grants; the Government Accounting Standards Board has mandated
stringent reporting requirements for pension obligations and investments; and
in 1988 the State of Illinois adopted legislation requiring on independent
compliance audit for any municipality with a TIF Diotrict, In addition to
tonar requirements, the magnitude of the Village's financial transactions have
increased and the memberships in JAWA, *[LP, Northwest central Dispatch and
the Solid Waste Agency have ouund to the scope of the auditor's respon-
sibilities.
John Fulton Dixon
paqc z
Audit Proposals
The Finance Department has attempted to keep audit reoo down by assuming an
iqcreaaing share or the audit work. In the RFP we indicated that the Village
would make all zlnoinn entries and would prepare audit workpapers for all
asset and liability accounts. we also stated that for the last three years
the village has prepared "pencil copies" or the financial statements thus
ceuvoiny the amount of time required from the auditors. This effort has
resulted in fees for 1986, 1987 and 1988 averaging $13,600 per year compared
to average naea or $15'600 for the previous eight years. In the current RFP
we asked for optional quotations if the pencil copy of the statements would be
prepared by the Village.
In the nFp'o, we asked for quotations for e three-year period. This feature
was included because an audit firm makes a substantial investment in time
during the first year of an audit and the fee is usually more reasonable if
the additional first-year costs can be spread over a three-year period. I
should mention, however, that the RFP stated that the Village reserves the
right to terminate the agreement at any time if the audit work does not meet
our expoctationa. The proposals were generally very competitive and aro
summarized on the attached achouulo.
Kacrivon and Byrne submitted the proposal for the lowest fee under both
options. Their fee for the first year is $14,000 if the Village prepares the
pencil copies of the statements, and $43.200 for the three-year period. If
they prepare the statements, the first-year fee is $14,800 and the three-year
total in $45,600. The next lowest fees are from the other local firm,
panoolfi, Topolski, Weiss and Co. If the village prepares the statements the
first year roe is $14,800 and for three years the total fee is $*6,300. If
they prepare the statements the first year re* is $17,800 and the three year
totals are $55,3CO.
The third loves-_ fees and the lowest proposal from a national firm is the
proposal from Touche noea a Co. Their paee are competitive at $15,765 for the
first year if we prepare the statements and $17,533 if they prepare the
atetementa. The three year totals are $50,165 and $55.472 for the two
options.
I believe each of the firms which submitted proposals aro qualified to do the
audit and would provide highly professional services. However, because of the
make -"p of the firms there aro certain advantages that each firm can "rrrr a
municipal client. Some of those highlights are summarized below:
Kerrison and Byrne has experience with the village of Mount Prospect and
has a great deal of governmental auditing experience. They list 33
current or former municipal clients in the Chicago Area and 24 Townships,
Libraries, Park Districts and School Districts. Additionally, they uu
the audit work for the Northwest Municipal Conference, lCM«, JwNA, wwC0
and HELP. The partners of K & B have been active in GFOx and the
Certificate of Achievement Program. narrioon and Byrne has stated that
to maintain objectivity they will maaigm a new audit partner and manager
to our account.
John Fulton Dixon
Page }
Audit Proposals
Ppndolfi, Topolski, woimm & Co. listed 16 municipal clients and a number
of special districts and state agencies. They have been active in GFU4
and have demonstrated a commitment to municipal auditing. They are u
relatively small firm and as such the partners have a closer association
with the audit client. They also indicated that they provide some
graphics and trend information to supplement the financial statements.
Touche Rosa and Co, is one of the "big eight" firms with 83 offices and
27.000 employees nationwide. The Chicago office is staffed by 200 pro-
fessionals. Touche Ross has had a strong commitment to governmental
accounting with 207 local, state and Federal governmental units or
agencies as clients. In the Chicago office, 14% of their ovaineoa is in
governmental auditing. The proposal submitted to the Village of Mount
Prospect contained a detailed audit plan which demonstrated the serious-
ness of their interest in the Village.
A firm like Touche Ross has the resources to provide not only quality
audit services, but a number of other services as well. They provide
actuarial services, benefit consulting, advanced technology consulting
and financial management services. Each of these services and the extent
of their experience add to their value as mvuitvzo.
The other four firms listed are all notional firms and have excellent
reputations as auditors. Each one also has unique qualities that they
can offer to their clients.
In summary, l believe the Village has received very competitive quotations
from good accounting firms. when we consider that the t^cno lowest proposals
are at the level of or less than the amount the Village paid for the years of
1978 - 1985, I think it demonstrates that they are good prupuoalo. Kacrioon
and Byrne submitted the lowest overall quotation and they have served the
Village well. Touche Roos had previously been the Village's auditors from
1977 - 1978 and there would be e benefit to the Village in using a nationally
recognized firm.
Because the lowest quotation is from the firm that has been doing the audit
for the last six yearo. I think we should look to the Village Board for
direction. Korrison & Byrne is a good firm, but under the circumstances, it
may be an opportune time to move to Touche Ross & Co.
Enc
Firm
Karrison & Byrne
Pandolfi, Topolski, Weiss
Touche Ross
Ernst Whinney
Coopers & Lybrand
Grant Thornton
KPMP Peat Marwick
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMMARY OF AUDIT PROPOSALS
February 1989
-------
PROPOSED FEES
- OPTION
1 -------
-------
PROPOSED FEES
- OPTION
2 -----
88/89
89/90
90/91
88/89
89/90
90/91
Fee
Fee
Fee
Total
Fee
Fee
Fee
Total
$14,000
$14,400
$14,800
$43,200
$14,800
$15,200
$15,600
$45,600
$14,800
$15,500
$16,000
$46,300
$17,800
$18,500
$19,000
$55,300
$15,765
$16,700
$17,700
$50,165
$17,533
$18,468
$19,471
$55,472
$16,500
$17,250
$18,000
$51,750
$19,500
$20,250
$21,000
$60,750
$17,000
$18,000
$19,000
$54,000
$18,600
$19,725
$20,875
$59,2""
$17,900
$18,800
$19,800
$56,500
$23,100
$24,000
$25,000
$72,100
$20,100
$21,500
$22,900
$64,500
$22,600
$24,250
$25,900
$72,7:.
Option 1 - Village Prepares Statements
Option 2 - Auditors Prepare Statements
_
Village of M� nt Prospect —
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Directorl���
DATE; February 16, 1989
SUBJECT: Proposals for Fixed Asset Inventory and Appraisal
In the 1988/89 budget funds were included to obtain a comprehensive inventory
and appraisal or all village fixed assets. Fixed assets include land, land
improvements, buildings and equipment. These types of assets have been
acquired over the years and records have been maintained for accounting
purposes, but we du not have a comprehensive inventory of these items. The
purpose or an inventory and appraisal is to be uvco that records the Village
maintains are complete and that values are up-to-date. A complete record of
all of the Village's fixed assets will provide the assurance that all mooeta
have been accounted for and will provide a better method or controlling those
eoeete.
Requests for proposals (RFP) for a Fixed Asset Inventory, Appraisal and
wan"gomnnt System were sent to four appraisal companies. In the RFP we
spelled out the purpose and scope of the services being requested and the
types of information to be returned. We specifically requested that the
proposals include the pena for the inventory and appraisal, togging of ua,eto
and the fee for an annual update of the inventory. A copy of the RFP is
attached. Following is a summary of the proposals:
Invehtory 8 Annual
_Appraisal� Update
American Appraisal $ 4,550 $ 400
Fidelity Appraisal $19,100 $1,890
Valuation Counselors $25,400 $ 750
When I reviewed the above proposals, I contacted American Appraisal to be sure
there was not a mistake in their vropoeal. Their representative aoovrou me by
phone that it was correct and confirmed that it included the Village Hall,
Public Safety Building, Senior Center, Public Works Facility and the two
outlying Fire Stations. The only difference between the proposal from
American Appraisal and the other two companies is that American Appraisal did
not include four pumping stations, three reservoirs and two lift stations.
They stated that they would include any additional areas at $700 per day and
estimated it would take no more than two days to do these facilities.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
Proposals for Fixed Asset Inventory and Appraisal
American Appraisal included a list of 144 municipalities, park districts,
libraries and sanitary districts in the Chicago area that are current clients.
Included in this group is the entire membership of the Intergovernmental Risk
Management Agency of 42 communities. Their experience is extensive and the
references I checked were all good.
To implement this project we have established a committee made up of wnxe
3annnia, Dun Mazza, Carol Widmer, Lima Angell and myself. The committee has
discussed the proposals and it in our recommendation that the village accept
the proposal from American Appraisal Co. To provide enough time to include
all villogo property it is recommended that a maximum or five additional days
be authorized.
It is my recommendation that we accept the proposal from American Appraisal
_ ~—VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT --
1O0 South Emerson Street
Mount Pcnopece^ IL 60056
FIXED ASSET INVENTORY, APPRAISAL AND MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
PURPOSE
Consulting assistance is being requested for an in,untory,-'--~~i l and development
of rivou maaeL management system. The Village's generalized --^a`---
veo in this regard
are as follows:
A. Insurance Requirements
1. Total Insurable value
2. Specific vel"ea
Y. Coinsurance Compliance
B. Financial Reporting
1. Audit Compliance (Rey: AICPA State and Local Government)
2. Materiality Disclosure (Re[; Disclosure Guidelines for Offerings of
Securities by State and Local Governments - OFOA}
C. Costing Accounting
1. Rate Setting (enterprise funds)
2. Program Cost Recovery
D. Capital Expenditure Planning
1. Budget Request Substantiation
2. Capital wvact Improvements and Replacement Forecasting
E. Fixed Asset Control
1. rived xaaot Reporting
2. Timely Updating of Records
SCOPE `
The generalized scope of services provided would be as follows:
A. Consultant will implement, in joint cooperation with personnel of the
Village, a fixed asset management oynLmo which will provide a verified record
of all fixed assets.
B. Consultant will provide an inventory, costing, valuation and the preparation
or property accounting records covering land, buildings, building components,
improvements other than buildings, machinery and equipment.
C. Infrastructure fixed 000mta (roads, bridges, curbs and gutters, streets and
sidewalks, easements, drainage systems, street signs and street lighting
systems, traffic signal systems), will be included in the inventory.
D. It is proposed that the Village's capitalization threshold will he $500 with
group control.
E. The consultant will be responsible for computerizing this information on the
consultant's computer and will provide report processing services as required
by ��hc Village. In addition, the consultant will make available to the
Village its computer [ileo and file layout in o format compatible with the
Village's \gm SxoLem/36 computer. x preliminary listing of the types of
reports that will be required are as follows:
1. Fixed assets by department, site and class.
2. Fixed eoeetn by site, class and department.
n. Fixed oeeeto by class, department and site.
4. Fixed 000eta by expected retirement dates, by department, site and class.
5. Detailed and summary report or fixed assets locations indicating the
value or each building and e separate value for the property located
within the buiIding. These values should reflect historical cost plus
full replacement insurance value and depreciated values.
6. A summary of licensed and unlicensed motor vehicles, describing then by
year° manufacturer, vehicle identification number or serial number and
indicating the cost new and at market value today. The value ohvvlu
include any special equipment such as two-way radios, etc,, and any
permanently attached equipment therein.
7. Fixed ooaeto by fund and by revenue source for accounting depreciation
purposes.
F. The consultant will be responsible for training Village employees in proce-
dures to report property transactions and for future updating.
G. The consultant will be responsible for assisting Village personnel in
developing e property manual that will set forth the Village's policies and
procedures.
H. Yoc,cnnoultm`t will be responsible for providing annual updating services for
the perpetuation of the ayotem,
z. The consultant will interface with our independent auditors to 000vrm the
acceptance of the final work product.
_2-
/lMlmG REQUIREMENTS
The village expects that the completed report will be finished before April 30, 1989
The consultant should set forth the proposed work schedule and plan to complete all
^
phases of the work before April 30, 1989.
SELECTION PROCESS
The selection committee will evaluate proposals primarily on the following criteria:
A. Understanding of the engagement.
B. Acceptability of anncvmzx and work plan.
C. Qualifications of the firm.
D. Qualifications of the assigned individuals.
E. Overall rneo,
The Village reserves the right to reject any and all po,puoolo and to make its
selection on a discretionary basis.
PRupo6xL FORMAT
Please moil or deliver throe copies of your proposal, with attachments, by 10:00 a.m.,
Monday January 23, 1989 to:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
David C. Jepson, Finance Director
100 South [mwcuun Street
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Please indicate on the outside of the envelope that it is in regard to the Village of
Mount Prospect Fixed Asset Management Proposal.
The proposal should include the following information:
A. Cover Letter - Introduction
Name of contact person in your firm.
`
Specifics regarding i in fixed asset appraisals, inventories, and
management ovoccmo, including the names or clients or a similar size to the
Village and duration of assignments.
C. Technical Approach
1. An analysis of the various methedqlogieo by which a fixedaaset appraisal
can be developed, including discussion of the advantages and dis-
advantages of your recommended approach. Plouam include "asset tagging"
.in your discussion.
_3-
y. Booed on your preliminary investigation, state whichmethod/process you
believe would he most coot beneficial to the villagn. Clearly state the
reasons supporting your conclusions and any assumptions made.
3. w detailed "mm^ plan that your organization would follow in this assign-
ment.
eoi -wmnt, Indicate progress review meetings with Village officials, specific
output generated at various steps, and major milestones.
D. Staffing and Fees
1. The individuals that will participate on this assignment, including their
uto[p classification, and the estimated hours each will participate.
Include a resume for each individual.
2. The number of hours by staff classification, including their hourly
rates. Each phase of the p (see general scope of work above)
should be priced separately. Indicate a maximum fixed fee, including
out-of-pocket expenses.
E. References
1. An example of fixed asset appraisal for a local government that your
organization has developed as an attachment to your proposal.
2. The name and phone number of a contact person in the above organization.
January 6, 1989
- 4 -
David C. JeKon-
Finance Director
'
Village of M ` nt Prospect —'
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Dicootoc{4=} \J
DATE: February 16, 1989
SUBJECT: Catch Basin and Inlet Repair Contract
On July 19, 1988, the Village Board approved u bid of $30,971.02 from
Arrow Road Construction for catch basin and inlet repairs. The project
was being done jointly with the Illinois Highway Department Maintenance
Division, with the Village share being $13,324.86 and the State's share
$17,647.16. During the course of the work it was determined that one of
the inlets ovndod considerably more work than had been anticipated,
resulting in additional costs of $4,875.58. The State agreed to pay their
share of the additional costs and the Village Engineer authorized the
additional work.
With the above changes, the State will be paying $21,v41.18 and the
Village $13,905.42. I am requesting that the village Board approve the
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Director, Finance
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: January 16, 1989
SUBJECT: Catch Basin & Inlet Repair Contract
Attached is the final bill from Arrow Road Construction Co., for
the above contract. Please note that the final bill totals
$35,846.60. The approved Purchase Order #24201 is only
$30,971.02.
The extra work (which accounts for the difference between the
final bill and the Purchase Order) was approved by the State.
The Illinois Highway Department Maintenance Division has agreed
to reimburse the Village $21,941.18 for the extra approved work.
Once the State pays for their portion, the Village will realize a
new cost of $13,905.42, for this project.
�__
FT/m
Attachment
Village of Mount Prospect .61
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
To: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
From: Michael Sims, Planner
Date: January 5, 1989
Subject: Reese Resubdivision
1217 Wildwood Lane
The applicant is requesting approval of this plat in order
to subdivide Lot 2 and thus create two single family lots, Lots 1
and 2. A home currently exists on the proposed Lot 1. Both lots
would be zoned R-1. The Board of Zoning Appeals has recommended
approval of a variation permitting a 63.75' lot width for both
lots. No Development Code modifications are being requested.
Staff reviewed the plat and found that each lot has a lot
area of 10,295 square feet. Staff had no objections to the plat.
The Plan Commission heard this item on Wednesday, January 4,
1989 and voted 6-0 in favor of recommending approval of the plat.
Approved:
Davi 2 M. Clements, AICP
REESES RESUBDIVISION
of
:.ot 2 in 'salter A.Johnson's Subdivision of Lot 12 In C.A.Goela+ Prospect
Gardens,& subdivision in the Northeaat 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 oY Section 35.
Township 42 North,hange 11,:ast of the 3rd.P.L'.,according to the plat thereof
recorded January 3,1446 in boos 356 of Plats,on page 24 as Document Number
13688886 in Cook County, Illinois. (CaNrA/N/C+, 2o, S9/i,./.!
W/LDW00D LANE
Nt ctT.- L p 7+GaTEt7
127 50' — —1--
- 63 75' 63 75' 12750'
V
4 ado _
2
pIIp O
LOT'�I w nor y W z3
.d 4 F
9°TELO GATION
� r r
,.,; .v V .•
J 4,./ y�am^y,
... .,... �. WI } I (,Qj 24.0 tl..•„^ `„
w Wau�. Est �ST� tl OLL
J 1K W j
r�4 ZS' BEAK YAiCCY SET 5AGK L1*JF-
W
w. �. o
aMl ` +"" 5' EASEMfiN'T FOR PuBu/G UT°LI'%'�ES t 97CAWA(A. "
..... 4*0, saw _ 63 75 " 63.7
-W Cos.
cA9;F- V.-1 -G RL PVSb�G uT1 Ll TIES
dos M M
5TACHQkA RESIJBLitVISIpN -Z, c
«uoi ewes&, for J,as � � K
ewwwww,wwww..�e. vel, }
LOT 2
fry,V ID
5
Rhone 312 / 392-6000
A G B N D A
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Regular Meeting
Thursday, February 23, 1989
8:00 P. M.
112 E. Northwest Highway
2nd Floor
The petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.1001.B.3
to allow a garage for four cars (approximately 1200 square feet),
instead of a two -car, 600 square foot garage as allowed by Code.
Also requested is a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a
maximum driveway width of 45 feet at the garage doors instead of
21 feet normally allowed. Village Board action will be required
for both variations.
M. WiL. jig 01IIIIIIIIII
The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from B-
3 to I-1 Light Industrial. A Special Use Planned Unit Development
is also requested to allow 114,038 square feet of office/warehouse
space in a business park setting. Village Board action will be
required in this case.
In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen
(15) day period is provided for anyone wishing to appeal their
decision. No permit will be issued until this period has elapsed.
MAYOR
CAROLYN H KRAUSE
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
GERALD L, FARLEY
LEO FLOHOS
NORMA J MURAUSKIS
GEORGE R VAN GEEM
THEODORE J WATTENBERG
Village
of Mount Prospect
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60058
Rhone 312 / 392-6000
A G B N D A
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
Regular Meeting
Thursday, February 23, 1989
8:00 P. M.
112 E. Northwest Highway
2nd Floor
The petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.1001.B.3
to allow a garage for four cars (approximately 1200 square feet),
instead of a two -car, 600 square foot garage as allowed by Code.
Also requested is a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a
maximum driveway width of 45 feet at the garage doors instead of
21 feet normally allowed. Village Board action will be required
for both variations.
M. WiL. jig 01IIIIIIIIII
The applicant is requesting to rezone the subject property from B-
3 to I-1 Light Industrial. A Special Use Planned Unit Development
is also requested to allow 114,038 square feet of office/warehouse
space in a business park setting. Village Board action will be
required in this case.
In all cases where the Zoning Board of Appeals is final, a fifteen
(15) day period is provided for anyone wishing to appeal their
decision. No permit will be issued until this period has elapsed.
MAYOR
CAROLYN H KRAUSE
TRUSTEES
RALPH W ARTHUR
GERALDLFARLEY
LEO FLOROS
NORMA J MURAUSKIS
GEORGE R VAN SEEM
rHEODOREJ WATTENBERG
VILLAGE MANAGER
JOHN FULTON DIXON
M
Vi.
Village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Rhone 312 / 392-6000
A G E N D
BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
Regular Meeting
Wednesday, February 22, 1989
Trustee's Room
Village Hall
7:30 P.M.*
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
OLD BUSINESS
A. Review of Status of TIF Expansion and Public
Works
NEW BUSINESS
A. Parking Study Update (Village Library and Bank)
B. Recap of 2/4/89 Village Board -Public Works
Meeting
ADJOURNMENT
*COMMISSIONERS;
PLEASE BRING YOUR THREE-RING BINDER TO THE MEETING.
M -T U- T, ' S
BUSINESS DISTRICT DEVELOPMENT AND
REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
January 25, 1989
CALL TO ORDER
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Business District
Development and Redevelopment Commission was held on Wednesday,
January 25, 1989. The meeting was called to order at 7:36 by
Chairman Predovich.
ROLL CALL
Members of the Commission present: Irvana Wilks, Earl Johnson,
John Eilering, Joseph Janisch, and Chairman Hal Predovich. Also
present were Janet Hansen, Executive Director Chamber of
Commerce, David Clements, Planning &.Zoning Director, and Kenneth
Fritz, Economic Development Director.
MINUTES
The December 14 minutes were approved as submitted on a motion by
Irvana Wilks, seconded by Earl Johnson. The motion passed
unanimously.
OLD BUSINESS
TIF Expansion
David Clements, Planning & Zoning Director, gave a brief status
report regarding the Tax Increment Finance expansion area and
other sections proposed for target area redevelopment in the TIF
District #1. These included the target area "D", located on
frontage of Northwest Highway between Emerson and Main Streets.
Mr. Clements indicated that Fanny May Candies has yet to respond
to inquires from the Village. He was doubtful that Fanny May
would be willing to redevelop their property and stated that they
have no intention of selling their property for redevelopment.
Business District Development
and Redevelopment Commission
Minutes - January 25, 1989
Page Two
Pr-operty owners in the expansion area of the TIF District west of
Main Street have been contactedbut no firm plans have been put
together. Northwest Electric Is still studying the final shape
and size of their proposed addition. Staff will soon under'take.a
site survey to determine if there are other feasible locations in
the Village for Prospect Auto Body. The Prospect Theater owner
is willing to discuss selling his property but would rather be
considered for possible inclusion in the redeveloped area in a
new theater. Contacts have been made with single-family owners
on Busse Avenue':
Public Works Area - Pine Street
The staff has been in contact with adjacent property owners to
the Public Works property; in an effort to see if there was an
interest in potential purchase of the Village owned property and.
possible commercial redevelopment of this area adjacent to the
Aldi"'s property. Other ;poten'tial' interested developers have
indicated an interest in this property but would have to first
work through the owners of adjacent properties in order to
develop a meaningful redevelopment project.
Mr. Johnson indicated that he felt that there was still a
demonstrated need for; additional residential units to be located
in the downtown area and felt that this aspect of redevelopment
should not be overlooked. BDDRC members felt that the Public
Works property area and the Tax Increment Finance District
expansion block (Target Area "F") should be linked together.
Staff indicated that they would be looking at some design options
through staff f tudy
ADJOURNMENT
There being no other business to be conducted, the meeting was
adjourned at 8:46 P.M. on a motion ,by Mr. Johnson, seconded by
Mr. Elering. The motion to adjournwas unanimous.
Respectf ly;'submitted,'
r ;
i'
ennet"h RG" Fritz,.,
Economic Development Dir ctor
AG[mDA
FINANCE COmMl55lom
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1989
7`3O P.M.
TRUSTEE'S ROOM, 2nd FLOOR
VILLAGE HALL
100 SOUTH EMERSON STREET
1 1989/90 Budget Review - Human Services
ll 1989/90 Budget Review - Fire Department ,
oz 1989/e0 Budget navimv - Police Department