HomeMy WebLinkAbout3788_001Next Ordinance No. 4233 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Resolution No. 38-90 �a
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT September 4, 1990
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E 8
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center September 4, 1990
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Parley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee mark Busse Trustee George van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Busse
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, August 21, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. United Way Presentation to the Village
VII. MAYORIS REPORT
A. PROCLAMATIONS
1. CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK, September 30 - October 6, 1990
2. BICENTENNIAL CONSTITUTION WEEK, September 16 - 23, 1990
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION
13-124 OF CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES) OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance provides for an appeal from the
decision of the Local Liquor commissioner to
the Circuit Court of Cook County, as well as
establishing the requirement to post a notice
of closure on any establishment due to revocation
of the local liquor license. (Exhibit A)
C. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance creates a Class 'IWO' liquor license
for the Sizzler Restaurant, 110 East Rand Road. (Exhibit B)
D. Appointment: Richard Rogers to Sign Review Board
Elizabeth Ann Luxem to the Plan Commission
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Bid opening for the sale of Village owned property
commonly known as 443 West Rand Road.
B. --st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
(TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance creates a $2.00 per 12 hour day
parking fee for the metered parking areas on
Prospect Avenue and to include a 'YIELD' sign
on Henry Street.at Forest Avenue. (Exhibit C)
Ix. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 69-V-90, 400 West Kensington Road
The Petitioner isrequesting a,variation to
permit a 4 foot separation between an
existing deck and garage. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 7-0.
B. ZBA 70 -SU -90, 405 East Highland
The Petitioner is requesting a special use to
permit a 3 -car garage. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 7-0.
C. ZBA 72-V-90, Wal-Mart - Mount Prospect Plaza
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a 10.5 foot setback for commercial property
adjacent to residential property; a 5 foot
setback on an interior lot line; a 10 foot setback
for the public right-of-way; and, a variation to
permit a lot coverage of 79.7%. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting these requests
by a vote of 7-0.
D. Clarewood Plat of Subdivision
1. This plat creates 2 lots of record for property
located on Hill Street north of Rand Road for
development as single family homes. The
Plan Commission recommends approving this
subdivision-.
2. Request to amend the Comprehensive Plan to
reclassify this property from commercial to
residential.
E. A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE MAXIMUM LOAN
AMOUNT FOR THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
GRANT FUNDED SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING
REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM
This Resolution authorizes an increase in the
maximum amount permitted for the residential
rehabilitation program from $15,000 to $25,000. (Exhibit D)
F. Authorization to increase recycling contract
with Browning Farris to include multi -family
dwelling units.
G. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 21
OF THE VILLAGE CODE TO PROVIDE PENALTIES FOR
FALSE ALARMS TO THE FIRE DEPARTMENT
This Ordinance establishes a penalty for property
owners who have repeated false alarms requiring
Fire Department personnel and/or equipment to
respond. (Exhibit E)
H. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VIII
OF CHAPTER 11 RELATIVE TO REAL ESTATE TRANSFER
TAX
This Ordinance authorizes a rebate of $2.00 of
the $3.00 real estate transfer tax for commercial
property owners relocating within the Village. (Exhibit F)
I. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
(TRAFFIC CODE) -OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance authorizes placement of a "Yield"
sign on westbound Henry Street at Forest Avenue
and clarifies the speed limit on Hatlen Avenue
north and southbound. (Exhibit G)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. Bids:
1. Chicago Northwestern right-of-way landscaping
2. Shade Trees
B. Request for reconsideration relative to the
purchase of a tow truck
C. Status Report
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Pending Litigation
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AUGUST 21, 1994
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION
$ 869,089
The invocation was given by Trustee Wattenberg.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
72,881
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
MINUTES
the Mayor and Board of Trustees held August 7, 1990.
56 462
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Busse, Floros,
94,487
Van Geem, Wattenberg
649
Nays: None
.-
Motion carried.
-
APPROVAL OF BILLS
4,960
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
APPROVE BILIS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 869,089
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
47,355
Community Development Block Grant Fund
72,881
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
61,622
waterworks & Sewerage Fund
390,805
Parking System Revenue Fund
56 462
Risk Management Fund
94,487
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
649
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
.-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.yund
4,960
Special Service Area Const. $5
Special Service Area Coast. #6
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
764
Downtown Redev. Cornet. Fund (1987)
-.
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
4,440
Escrow Deposit Fund
21,626
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,625,140
Upon roll call: Ayest Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem
Nays: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
Trustee Wattenberg stated that he could not support
payment of the bills due to the fact that he does
not agree with payment of attorney fees for the law
suit dealing with the Solid Waste Agency.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to accept the financial report dated July 30, 1990,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
None..
MAYORIS REPORT
DECORATIVE At the last meeting of the Village Board, Stan Welch,
FENCE IN PARKWAY 1112 Greenwood, had requested relief from the
1i12 GREENWOOD regulation prohibiting an existing decorative fence
constructed in the parkway and to allow it to remain.
This matter was deferred to this meeting in order to
give staff an opportunity to respond to the request.
There was discussion as to the fact that sight
obstructions are not permitted in the parkway and
whether a split rail or decorative fence was a sight
obstruction. The suggestion was made that Mr. Welch
relocate this decorative fence from the parkway to
within his lot lines. David Clements, Director of
Planning & Zoning stated that fences are not permitted
in the front yard.
There was considerable discussion as to whether a
decorative fence should be considered a sight
obstruction, as well as the fact that there are many
decorative fences placed in front yards throughout the
Village and since no complaint has been received, the
Village has made no requirement to remove them.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to grant the waive requested and permit the decorative
fence to remain in the parkway until such time as it
deteriorates and falls into disrepair.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Wattenberg
Kays: Arthur, Van Geem
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem asked that the regulations governing
obstructions in the parkway be reviewed in its entirety
as to need, since several residents have requested
relief from these regulations, especially as it relates
to trees and shrubs in the parkway.
This subject will be placed on a future Committee of
the Whole agenda for discussion.
Trustee Corcoran noted that at least one resident was
instructed to remove shrubs from the parkway area and
asked that no action be taken until this matter has
been resolved by the Board.
APPOINTMENT: Mayor Farley requested confirmation of his appointment
RANDY TOELKE of Randy Toelke to the Constitutional BiCentennial
CONSTITUTION commission.
BICENTENNIAL
COMMISSION Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
Page 2 - August 21, 1990
to concur with the Mayor and appoint Randy Toelke
to the Constitutional BiCentennial Commission.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried."
Mayor Farley proclaimed the week of August 27 - 31, 1990
PROCLAMATION:
as "School's open Week1t in.Mount Prospect, requesting
SCHOOL'S OPEN
extra safety measures be taken by pedestrian and
WEEK
vehicular traffic during this period.
A request was presented by'Mr. & Mrs. Ward, 4 N. Pine
4 N. PINE
Street, for reimbursement of legal expenses they
REIMBURSEMENT
incurred as a result of an encroachment of 18 inches
of a home under construction next door. This matter
was discussed earlier in the year.
Several residents of the area voiced their concern
relative to the problems that have occurred as a
result of this home being constructed.
Mayor Farley explained that while the matter of the
encroachment has been resolved, the contractor for
this project has been exceptionally slow and the
Village, as well as the prospective owner/occupant
of this home are doing everything possible to
hasten its completion.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to authorize reimbursement of legal fees incurred
by Mr. & Mrs. Ward in the amount of $725.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: Arthur
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was present for second reading that would
AMEND CH. 13
amend Chapter 13 (Alcoholic Beverages) to provide
APPEAL
that any appeal from the decision of the Local
PROCESS
Liquor Commissioner must go before the Circuit
Court, and that a notice be posted informing patrons
that the liquor license for a specific establishment
had been revoked due to a violation of local
regulations.
Due to the fact that Attorney Michael Moran,
representing the Chamber of Commerce, had submitted
a written objection to the proposal, and at the
request of Dennis Saviano, President of the Mount
Prospect Chamber of Commerce, this matter was
deferred in order to allow time for the Village's
attorney for liquor license violations and Mr. Moran
an opportunity to meet and discuss the issues.
Trustee Wattenberg directed the Village Clerk to
inform the Senior Advisory Council of any and all
future hearings relative to liquor license violations.
This Ordinance will be presented September 4th for
a second reading.
A Resolution was presented that would permit a variation SIDEWALK
from the regulations governing the hours of operation CAFE:
of a sidewalk cafe for Sam's Place 14 West Prospect SAM'S PLACE
Avenue, on a trial basis. The permitted hours 14 W. PROSPECT
Page 3 - August 21, 1990
require' the operation to cease at 7:00 PM and the
request is to operate until 9:30 PM.
It was the recommendation of the administration that
a trial period, through November, 1990, be permitted
and if no problems are created,, then the Board may
consider amending the Village Code to expand the hours
of operation for a sidewalk cafe on a permanent basis.
RES.NO. 36-90 Trustee Floras, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 36-90
A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE HOURS FOR A
SIDEWALK CAFE AT 14 WEST PROSPECT AVENUE
ON A TRIAL BASIS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 31-V-90 ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church
NORTHWEST 1400 East Kensington Road
ASSEMBLY OF GOD An Ordinance was presented for 2nd reading that would
1400 KENSINGTON grant variations to permit a lot coverage of 61%, 512
parking spaces and a building height of 40 feet for the
proposed site of the new Northwest Assembly of God
Church.
The question was asked as to whether the River Trails
Park District and representatives from the Church have
been able to reach an agreement to trade land, which
would place the Church property in one large parcel,
rather than having the park in between the Church
properties. Mr. Gann, attorney for the Northwest
Assembly of God Church, stated that negotiations are
continuing but no agreement has been reached. Mr. Gann
also asked that the Board take action on the Ordinance
granting variations so that if negotiations are
unsuccessful to trade property the Petitioner would be
able to begin construction of the new church.
It was noted that if the Petitioner and River Trails
agree to trade properties, the Petitioner would be
required to file fora new public hearing if the
proposed location of the new church changes.
Trustee Floras, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4218
ORD.NO. 4218 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD
CHURCH LOCATED AT 1400 EAST KENSINGTON ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Floras, Van Geem,
Wattenberg, Farley
Nays: Busse, Corcoran
Motion carried.
REFERENDUM An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
QUESTION: would authorize a question to be placed on the ballot
PUBLIC SAFETY as to whether the voters would support the construction
BUILDING of a new Public Safety Building on the existing site
at a cost of $6,992,000.
ORD.NO. 4219 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
Page 4 - August 21, 1990
passage of ordinance No. 4219
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM
FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE
BALLOT FOR THE NOVEMBER 6, 1990 ELECTION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros
Van Geem, Farley
Nays: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
Trustee Wattenberg stated that he could not support
the ordinance since it was his feeling that the
Village Board should make these types of decisions.
Mayor Farley called a brief recess at this point in RECESS
the meeting (9:40 PM)
The meeting was reconvened at 9:50 PM.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Arthur
Trustee Busse
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Floros
Trustee Van Geem
Trustee Wattenberg
ZBA 45-V-90, 519 South Edward Street ZBA 45-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 519 S.EDWARD
would grant variations to permit a driveway 17 feet
wide, a zero foot front yard setback and a six inch
(611) side yard in order to have a parking pad. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 5-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for ORD.NO. 4220
for passage of Ordinance No. 4220
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 519 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 53-V-90, 319 South Beverly ZBA 53-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 319 BEVERLY
would grant variations to permit a 6 foot side
yard in order to construct a room addition. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the
request in ZBA 53-V-90.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran,
Page 5 - August 21, 1990
seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays. -'None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4221 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee
rustee Busse, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4221
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 319 SOUTH BEVERLY
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 54-V-90 ZBA 54-V-90 and ZBA 55 -SU -90, 32 South Busse Road
ZBA 55 -SU -90 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
32,S.BUSSE RD grant a variation to allow a 60 foot turn -around in a
driveway and a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the
requests being the subject of ZBA 54-V-90 and ZBA 55 -
SU -90 by a vote of 4-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran,
seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4222 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4222
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND
VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 32 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 56-V-90 ZBA 56-V-90, 112 North Eastwood
112 N.EASTWOOD An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to permit a 2 foot side yard and a
15 foot height for a new garage. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting the side yard variation
by a vote of 4-1 and the height variation by a vote of
5-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran,
seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4223 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
Page 6 - August 21, 1990
passage of ordinance No. 4223
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 112 NORTH EASTWOOD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 57-V-90, 20 Audrey Lane
ZBA 57-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
20 AUDREY LN
would grant variations to permit an eighteen inch
(1811) side yard setback and a 30 foot driveway at
the widest point, for a parking apron. The zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting the variations
by a vote of 5-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
ORD.NO.4224
for passage of ordinance No. 4224
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 20 AUDREY LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 58-V-90, 613 North Russel
ZBA 58-V-90
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
613 N RUSSEL
would grant a variation to permit a 16.5 foot
driveway and a variation to permit a 2.5 foot
side yard setback for 4 parking pad. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 5-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
ORD.NO. 4225
for passage of ordinance No. 4225
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 613 NORTH RUSSEL
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - August 21, 1990
ZBA 59-V-90 ZBA 59-V-90, 730 East Northwest Highway
730 E.NORTHWEST An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
HIGHWAY grant variations to permit a zero foot front yard, a
2.5 foot side yard, 100% lot surface coverage and to
provide 10 parking spaces instead of the required 21
spaces. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 5-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays; None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4226 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4226
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 730 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: Corcoran, Van Geem
Motion carried.
ZBA 61-V-90 ZBA 61-V-90, 802 Dresser Drive
802 DRESSER DR An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to permit a 31 611 side yard in order
to replace, an existing patio. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of
4-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran,
seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4227 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4227
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 802 DRESSER DRIVE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 62-V-90 ZBA 62-V-90, 609 Noah Terrace
609 NOAH TERR An'Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to allow a 15 foot rear yard setback
in order to construct a room addition. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 4-0, provided the room addition is
constructed with face brick to match the house.
The Petitioner requested relief from the requirement
of the Zoning Board of Appeals that face brick be used
on the addition, noting that other structures in the
area have aluminum siding.
Page 8 - August 21, 1990
It was the consensus of the Board that brick veneer
would be acceptable, rather than face brick.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved ORD.NO. 4228
for passage of ordinance No. 4228
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 609 NOAH TERRACE
Upon roll call: Ayes; Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 63-V-90, 607 Noah Terrace ZBA 63-V-90
An ordinance was presented for first reading that 607 NOAH TER.
would grant a variation to permit a 15 foot rear
yard in order to add a room addition. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 4-0.
Inasmuch as this request is identical to the
previous case, the Board also agreed to permit
veneer brick rather than face brick on this
room addition.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Van Geem,
seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved ORD.NO. 4229
for passage of ordinance 4229
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 607 NOAH TERRACE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 65-V-90, 1307 East Ardyce Lane ZBA 65-V-90
An Ordinance was presented that would grant 1307 ARDYCE
a variation to allow a five foot (51) separation
between an existing deck and proposed family room.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
the variation requested, with the condition that
no additional buildings be permitted on this property.
At the request of the Petitioner Trustee Corcoran,
seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule
Page 9 - August 21, 990
NEW BUSINESS
AMEND CH.18 The Safety Commission had submitted its recommendations
relative to amending the Traffic Code (Chapter 18) to
provide for parking regulations on Prospect Avenue.
Portions of Prospect Avenue, east of Maple Street, will
be metered parking through a master collection box.
Various time limits will be changed as well as creating
a time limit of 12 hours for the metered areas on
Prospect Avenue.
PROSPECT AVE. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
establish parking zones and metered parking on Prospect
Avenue.
Page 10 - August 21, 1990
requiring two readings -of -an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4230
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4230
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1307 EAST ARDYCE LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros;
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PAR FOUR
The Par Four Plat of Subdivision was presented for
SUBDIVISION:
approval. This subdivision would create 4 lots of
1920 W.GOLF RD
record for single family homes. The Ordinance rezoning
the subject property from R -X to R-1 was approved by
the Board at their last meeting. The Plan Commission
recommends approving this plat of subdivision.
It was noted that while the roadway for these 4 homes
would be a -dedicated Village right-of-way, a covenant
will be executed requiring the residents to provide
their own snow plowing and ice removal.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his
signature .on the Par Four Plat of Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
PLAT OF EASEMENT
A Plat of Easement was presented that would create a
443 W. RAND RD
20 foot easement for a watermain on property awned by
the Village at 443 West Rand Road. This property is
slated for sale via bids to be opened September 4th.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his
signature on the Plat of Easement for 443 West Rand
Road.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
AMEND CH.18 The Safety Commission had submitted its recommendations
relative to amending the Traffic Code (Chapter 18) to
provide for parking regulations on Prospect Avenue.
Portions of Prospect Avenue, east of Maple Street, will
be metered parking through a master collection box.
Various time limits will be changed as well as creating
a time limit of 12 hours for the metered areas on
Prospect Avenue.
PROSPECT AVE. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
establish parking zones and metered parking on Prospect
Avenue.
Page 10 - August 21, 1990
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Pass: Busse
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ORD.NO. 4231
for passage of Ordinance No. 4231
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Pass:.Busse
Motion carried.
In line with discussion that took place at the last
Committee of the Whole meeting, an Ordinance will be
presented September 4th establishing a $2.00 per
12 hour day for metered parking on Prospect Avenue.
The Safety Commission submitted a recommendation to
AMEND CH.18
amend the Traffic Code to provide a "Yield" sign
"YIELD"
on Henry Street at Forest Avenue.
HENRY & FOREST
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,
moved to concur with the recommendation of the
Safety Commission and authorize a "Yield" sign
on Henry Street at Forest Avenue.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at
the next meeting of the Village Board on September 4th.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
AMEND CH.11
amend Article XI of Chapter 11 relative to taxi cab
SENIOR
fares for senior citizens.
CITIZEN TAXI
This subject was discussed at the last Committee of
CAB FARES
the whole meeting where it was suggested that the
senior citizen taxi cab rate structure be
changed in order to encourage better service and
participation by senior citizens. The proposal
provides for a 50/50 cost sharing between the Village
and the rider, with a maximum amount of $3.00 to be
paid by the Village. If approved, this rate
structure would become effective October 1, 1990.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
ORD.NO. 4232
Page 11 - August 21, 1990
for passage of Ordinance No. 4232
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XI OF CHAPTER 11
( BUSINESS LICENSES) RELATIVE TO THE SENIOR
CITIZEN TAXI CAB FARE RATES
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE XANAGERIS REPORT
BIDS: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented bid
results for various items.
BRUSH CHIPPER The following bids were received for a trailer mounted
brush chipper with trade-in:_
Bidder Model Amount
Aerial Equipment Brush Bandit 200+ $11,948
Schuster Equipment Brush Bandit 200+ $12,666
Alexander Ecuip.'Co. Eager Beaver $10,903
Itec Wood/Chuck Hy/Roller $14,572
Vermeer Illinois Vermeer 1250 $13,800
Vermeer Sales Vermeer 1250 $16,000
It was noted that this equipment has many variations,
particularly safety features. Upon reviewing the
equipment and various options that were bid, it was the
recommendation of the administration that authorization
be given to purchase the brush chipper bid by Vermeer
Illinois at a cost of $14,069.72, which includes one
set of spare parts, due to the safety features offered
on this piece, of equipment.
VERMEER ILL. Trustee Arthur,` seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration
and authorize the purchase of a 12" brush chipper from
Vermeer Illinois with a set of spare parts in an amount
not to exceed $14,069.72.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem,,Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
TRUCK WITH The following bids were received for one 35,000 GVWR
CRANE truck chassis and cab with crane and flatbed body with
trade-in:
Bidder Models Amount
Fischer Crane Co. IMC Hart Loadmaster
Fisher Copma C1230/2s $63,631.25
Freund Intl Inc. Knapheide PVMX-103A
Hiab #140 AW $67,631.43
Pollard Motor Co. Knapheide PVMX-103A
Hiab #140 AW $67,911.32
Runnion Equipment Midwest H4104 PA
National Crane N-95 $15,377.00
FISCHER CRANE Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
Page 12 - August 21, 1990
concur with the recommendation of the administration
and authorize the purchase of one 35,000 GVWR truck
chassis and cab with crane and flatbed body, with
trade-in, from Fischer Crane Company in an amount not
to exceed $56,631.25.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for a tow truck
TOW TRUCK
chassis and body:
CHASSIS & BODY.
Bidder Model Amount
R & R Truck Service Int. 4900 $100,450
Vulcan 30.25
Mid America Wrecker Int. 4900 $ 680150*
Vulcan 30.25
Mc Henry Truck Equip. Int. 4900 $ 77,196*
Vulcan 30.25
These bids were received with no bid bond nor
was the bid complete with cab/chassis
There was considerable discussion on the purchase of
this piece of equipment, including whether such an
expensive piece of equipment was necessary. It was
also suggested that the Village use a towing service
when the need presents itself.
Herb Weeks, Director of Public Works, stated that
there is a need for such a heavy piece of equipment
in order to tow fire department equipment, and for
towing plowing equipment when the vehicle has a full
load of snow or salt.
A suggestion was also made that a co-operative,
multi-community agreement be investigated in order
to share this a piece of equipment.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the bid submitted by R & R Truck Service
for the purchase of a tow truck chassis and body in
an amount not to exceed $100,450.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse
Nays: Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem,
Wattenberg
Motion failed.
The following bids were received for the purchase of
PORTABLE
of 10 open channel flow monitors and associated
OPEN-CHANNEL
equipment:
FLOW MONITORS
Bidder Model Amount
Elan Engineering Corp. Montedors-Whitney $48,578
Lee Engineering Sales Marsh-McBirney $49,905
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ELAN ENG.
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
Page 13 - August 21, 1990
and accept the bid submitted by Elan Engineering Corp.
for the purchase of 10 open channel flow monitors and
associated equipment in an amount not to exceed
$48,578. -
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MUNICIPAL A proposal was presented to retain Fletcher Engineering
PARKING LOT at a cost- of $9,500 to perform the necessary field
work, prepare design alternatives and construction
plans and specifications for the paving of the
municipal parking lot located at the northwest corner
of Main Street and Busse Avenue. This property is
owned by the Village and with the demolition of the
former V & G Printing building the lot will be enlarged
and possibly combined with the parking lot serving the
Senior Citizen Building.
FLETCHER ENG. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration
to retain Fletcher Engineering to perform the necessary
field work, prepare design alternatives and
construction plans and specifications at a cost not to
exceed $9,500.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
MFT FUNDS A Resolution was presented that would appropriate
$356.,000 from Motor Fuel Tax Funds for various projects
throughout the Village.
RES.NO. 37-90 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 37-90
A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
SALE OF PERSONAL An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
PROPERTY:AUCTION authorize the sale of miscellaneous equipment and
property owned by the Village through the auction
conducted by the Northwest Municipal Conference on
September 29, 1990.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
waive the rule requiring two reading of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4233 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for
Page 14 - August 21, 1990
passage of Ordinance No. 4233
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY
PUBLIC AUCTION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED
BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented to increase the contract amount
LINCOLN ST
for the reconstruction of the Lincoln Street Bridge
BRIDGE
with Albin Carlson & Company from the authorized
amount of $65,900 to $70,705.50, which would cover
the actual costs incurred.
It was noted that when the construction began and
the decking removed it became apparent that additional
reinforcing bars would be necessary, which was not
anticipated in the original specifications.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ALBIN CARLSON
to authorize the contract with Albin Carlson &
& COMPANY
Company for the reconstruction of the Lincoln Street
Bridge be increased by $3,975.80 for a total of
$70,705.50.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Village Manager Dixon announced the intention to
PUBLIC SAFETY
conduct several open house tours of the Public Safety
BUILDING TOURS
Building in order to allow the residents an
opportunity to decide first hand whether they could
support the referendum asking if a new Public Safety
Building should be constructed at a cost of
$6,992,000.
Mr. Dixon also stated that Russian Olympic athletes
would be making an appearance at Randhurst and will
be putting on a demonstration.
The Village Manager announced that Park Ridge has
NORTHWEST
expressed an interest in becoming a member of the
CENTRAL
Northwest Central Dispatch System.
DISPATCH
Trustee Van Geem noted that the City of Prospect
Heights and the Village of Palatine have recently
been accepted as members of Northwest Central Dispatch
System and now that Park Ridge has expressed an
interest in becoming a member he would like information
as to the maximum number of communities that could
participate in order to continue operating in an
efficient manner.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
Trustee Wattenberg suggested the Village continue to STATUS ON
be a 'watch dog' in the Circuit Court and asked that COURT CASES
the status of various Village cases be made known.
Page 15 - August 21, 1990
Mayor Farley expressed congratulations to Trustees
Arthur and Floros on the celebration of their
birthdays.
ADJOURNMEW
ADJOURN Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to
adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:04 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village clerk
Page 16 - August 21, 1990
VILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
August 30, 1990
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
8/17/90 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
8/16/90
8130./90
List of Bills
Entry 8130190
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
$ 2,966,637
$362,540
$ 557,720
$ 2,771,457
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
584,496
14,700
88,156
511,040
Community Development Block Grant Fund
3,794
-
3,300
494
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
105
23,024
11,071
12,058
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
3,099,685
139,656
55,529
3,183,812
Parking System Revenue Fund
176,547
7,138
1,006
182,679
I nternal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
1,097,470
144,648
124,709
1,117,409
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
502,996
-
88,301
414,695
Capital. Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund
242,613
84
2,730
239,967
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
141,608
750
14,766
127,592
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
-
-
-
Debt Service Fund
774,813
61,609
150
836,272
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
5,790
3,531
-
9,321
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,368,730
8,893
37,578
1,340,045
Police Pension Fund
14,880,627
22,797
39,599
14,863,825
Firemen's Pension Fund
16,815,901
21,861
41,684
16,796,078
Benefit Trust Funds
259,836
-
2.167
257.669
542,921,648
$811,231
11,068.466
-0- $42.b64,413
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE I
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AIROOM INC.
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
JAMES ATHANS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BADGER METER INC
CR WATER METERS
$270.30-
WATER METERS
$29361.30
$20091.00
TIMOTHY BOLL
REFUND FINAL HILL
$23.00
REFUND FINAL BILL
$2.00
$25.0k
CLAUSS FUELS9 INC.
FUEL
E169938.14
$160938.14*
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PMT P/R 8%23/90
$224.25
$224.25*
FRANK CLESEN AND SONS9 INC.
TREE BUSH FLWR REPL
$537.50
TREE BUSH FLWR REPL
$19255.80
S19793.30
COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR
01-12-103-017-0000
569033.91
08-12-103-014-0000
529887.37
s
08-12-101-025-0000
S147.88
08-12-01-001-0000
$36.78
$99105.94*
CUSTOM SEWER SERVICE
BOND REFUND
$100.00
S100.00
DES PLAINES LAWN SPRINKLERS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
5200.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
P/R ENDING 8/23/90
$3719016.42
P/R ENDING 8/23/90
$,*358.17
PIR ENDING 8/23/90
$473.88
s
P/R ENDING 8/23/90
$33,164.58
$4069D13.05*
DONOHUE 6 ASSOCIATES9 INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$547.86
CONSULTING FEES
$19694.00
$2,241.86
PEDRO FERNANDEZ
TRANSFER TAX REBATE
$448000
$448.00
FIRST NATOL BANK OF MT. PROS.
DUE TO FED PAY 8/23/90
$119070.69
DUE TO FED PAY 8/23/90
$29537.09
DUE TO FED PAY 8/23/90
$849.40
DUE TO FED PAY 8/23/90
$103.90
DUE TO FED PAY 8/23/90
$36.25
$141597.33*
TIMOTHY FLANNERY
ACCT 3681053 REFUND OVERPAYMENT
$6.84
ACCT 3681053 REFUND OVERPAYMENT
$.66
ACCT 3681053 REFUND OVERPAYMENT
$.75
$8.25
EDWARD FROMM JR.
REFUND FINAL BILL
$34.20
REFUND FINAL BILL
$3.30
$37.50
WESLEY G. GRASER AND AUDREY J.
Z5-31 SOUTH MAIN STREET
859000.00
S59000.00
ROSEMARY GROENWALD
BOND REFUND
$135.00
$135.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
BERNICE S. HAGELI
HOMES BY HEMPHILL7 INC.
JOHN HOWE
BRIAN IPSEN
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
KAUSHAAGEN CONST.
VICTOR R. KWIATKOWSKI
MCLENNAN E THEBAULT, INC.
MULTIGRAPHICS
NYBERG ENTERPRISES
PALATINE ELECTRIC CO.
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
PEPPER CONSTRUCTION
PROSPECT CLEANERS
PYRAMID CONCRETE E BLACKTOP
R J E G SEWER
RMRS SYSTEM
ARTHUR J. ROGERS C CO.
STANLEY ROSINSKI
ROUSE RANDHURST CORPORATION
SCARSDALE DEVELOPMENT, LTD.
LESLIE SCHABELL
JOHN STUFIN
SUPERVISION SPECIALIST IN.
KENNETH E. SYSLO
SZABO CONTRACTING
TANNER CONSTRUCTION CO.
TRAMMEL CROW CO.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE d/30/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL.
RIE TRANSFER TAX REBATE
$130.00
$130.00
REFUND FINAL BILL
$2.Z8
REFUND FINAL BILL
S.22
52.50
REFUND FINAL BILL
$150.48
REFUND FINAL BILL
$14.51
$165.00
SOFTWARE UPGRADE
$239.00
5239.00
PMT PIR 8123/90
$254.00
$254.00,
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL BILL
$24.25
REFUND FINAL BILL
$2.20
526.45
BOND REFUND
$445.00
$445.00
BOND REFUND
$500.00
BOND REFUND
5100.00
$600.00
BOND REFUND
$50.06
$50.00
OUPL PMT CONTRACTORS LICENSE
$17.5Ci
$17.50
AUG POLICE PENSION DISB
S39098.81
Y
AUG FIRE- PENSION DIS3
$41,684.19
$819283:00*
BOND REFUND
$450.00
5450.00
BOND REFUND
$50.06
$50.00
REFUND DUPLICATE PMT
$17.50
$17.50
BOND REFUND
5100.00
5100.00
POSTAGE METER ADVANCE DEP
$3,000.00
$39000.00*
REFUND TESTING FEE
$39498.00
$39498.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$107000.00
$i0*000.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
R/E TRANSFER TAX REBATE_
$316.00
$316.00
REFUND FINAL BILL
S9.I2
REFUND FINAL BILL
5.88
$10.00
BOND REFUND
$450.00
$450.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FEE PAID
$5.00
$5.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$107000.00
$101000.00
REINSPECTION FEE C38Z1
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE C4899
$50.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
REINSPECTION
FEE
C5252
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C66J7
$55.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7282
$25.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7509
$50.00
REINSPECTION
FEE
C7767
$15.00
$295.OT
WOLF POINT REALTY
00 N0 REFUND
$3v000.O0
BOND REFUND
$2:300.00
BOND REFUND
$1#500.00
BOND REFUND
$2#300.00
BOND REFUND
$3#000.00
BOND REFUND
$1#SUO.00
$13#600.00
XEROX CORP.
MTCE CONTRACT
$102.25
$102.25
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$5849689.82
GENERAL FUND
$396#751.17
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
SIT462.07
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$li#G70.69
WATER E SEWER FUND
$4`*113.23
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$510.13
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT
CONST 1985
$139921.28
POLICE PENSION FUND
$399598.81
FIREMEN'S PENSION
FUND
$41#684.19
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$379578.15
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
BUSSE'S FLOWERS E GIFTS
FLOWERS
$45.00
FLOWERS
553.OU
$98.00
MOUNT PROSPECT JAYCEES PARADE
REIMS T-SHIRTS
585.00
$85.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$114.12
$114.12#
V E G PRINTERS INC.
LETTERHEADS
$287.00
ENVELOPES
$199.00
$486.00
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$783.12
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE. APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND 0733.12
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
$50.0'
JANET ABERNETHY
AAASWB LEVEL B EXAM
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT
AD
IRENE F. BAHR
SERVICES RENDERED
EDWARD CAVELLO
EXPENSES
CRAIN*S CHICAGO E3USINEESS
SUBSLKIPTIUN - DIXON
JOHN F. DIXON
CONFERENCE EXPENSES
GLASS9 HILLS DALLMEYER E ROTH9
SERVICES RENDERED
THE HERALD
AD
ICMA
PUBLICATION
JONES♦ WARE E GRENARD
SPECIAL COUNSEL
PEDERSEN E HOUPT.
SERVICES RENDERED
$369.11
SERVICES RENDERED
$526.75
SERVICES RENDERED
$531.25
SERVICES RENDERED
$116.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$41.25
SERVICES RENDERED
$509.43
SERVICES RENDERED
$39410.84
SERVICES RENDERED
$21.25
SERVICES -JULY
$202.20
SERVICES -JULY
1361.50
SERVICES -JULY
$19352.5U
SERVICES -JULY
5116.80
SERVICES -JULY
$140.79
SERVICES -JULY
$68.75
SERVICES -JULY
$19079.62
SERVICES -JULY
$2.40
SERVICES -JULY
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$11.40
MISC EXPENSES
$9.00
MISC EXPENSES
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.0'
$63.00
$83.00
$19201.50
$1:201.50
$86.50
$80.50
$59.00
$59.00
$19159.90
$19159.90
$59995.04
$59995.04
$142.35
$142.35
$19.36
$19.30
$1031.55
$19531.55
$245.21
$127.50
$369.11
$526.75
$531.25
$116.00
$41.25
$509.43
$39410.84
$21.25
$202.20
1361.50
$19352.5U
5116.80
$140.79
$68.75
$19079.62
$9*210.T5
$2.40
$97.4T
#
$11.40
$111.27*
$9.00
$9.00*
VENDOR
VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
VISA
YON t3RIESEN AND PURTELL, S.C.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
AA SWIFT PRINT• INC.
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
GLORIA BARLETTA
CORTEZ DIXON
EDWARD FRANCE
JOHN KEANE
MICHAEL LOCASHIO
CAROLYN A. MILLER
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
SUSAN MUELLER
OFFICE SQUARE
CHERYL L. PASALIC
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
APRIL RAJCZYK
JERRY RAJCZYK
TASCHO SAEMS
FRANK SMITH
WALTER SOSIN
ROBERT TOBA
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
ROTARY DUES i FEES
CONFERElCE EXPENSES-DIXON
SERVICES RENDERED
$239Ub2.67
VILLAGE NEWSLETTER
AIRFARE NATOA CONFERENCE
COMM ASST CREW 7/3/90
TALK OF THE TOWN CREW
COMM ASST CREW 7/17
COMM ASST CREW 7/3
COMM ASST CREW 7/4 E 8/7
TALK OF THE TOWN CREW
JULY 6 AUGUST STIPEND
COMM AS -)T CREW 7/4 G 8/14
TALK OF THE TOWN CREW
COMM ASST CREW 7/17
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ADVANCE-NATOA CONFERENCE
MISC EXPENSES
3121 BO MTG PROD CREW
BO MFG PROD CREW 8/21
COMMUNITY ASST CREW
COMMUNITY ASST CREW 7/4 S 8/7
4TH OF .JULY CREW
4TH OF JULY CREW
PAGE 5
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
S154.00
$154.00
6455.50
6465.50
$29774.01
$2*774.Di
***TOTAL**
$239062.67
s335.50
$335.50
$48.00
$48.00
$25.00
510.00
$35.00
625.00
$25.00
SZ5.00
$25.00
$50.00
s1o.00
$60.0
$200.01?
5200.00
$50.00
$50.00
510.00
s1U.00
$25.00
$25.00
$18.76
$18.76
$710.00
$710.00
$30.OU
$30.00*
525.00
S25.UO
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.UO
$50.00
$50.00
625.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
***TOTAL**
$Iip747.26
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMUUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND 51,747.26
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ICMA
PUBLICATIONS
SZ5.90
$25.90
MONROE SYSTEMS FOR BUSINESS9 I
Rl dBJNS
$73.56
$73.56
NEWPORT COLOR INC.
SUPPLIES
$275.00
$275.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
52.60
#
MISC EXPENSES
58.55
511.15#
PRO -LAM* INC.
LAMINATED COVERS -FINANCIAL REPORT
$74.64
$74.60
PUBLIX.OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$85.52
$65*52
RYDIN SIGN AND DECAL
RIE TRANSFER STAMPS
$431.50
$431.50
WALL STREET JOURNAL
ONE YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
$129.00
1129.00
XERJX CORP.
MONTHLY CHCS 109J COPIER
$19610.06
MTCE CONTRACT
$98.88
$19708.94
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$29,315.17
GENERAL FUND
529815.17
VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE
AA SWIFT PRINT* INC:
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
IUE14TITY
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
VILLAGE NEWSLETTER
LEGAL NOTICE
SWEATERS
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
LEGAL
523376.85 $29.376.85
$51.9L $51.92
559.73 $59.73
$64.93
$53.62
$60.93
$58.50
$129.18
$114.43
VENDOR
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICt
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
POSTMASTER
SHANE'S ENGRAVING
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
RISK MANAGEMENT
VILLAGE JF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT HATE 8/30/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
LEGAL
LEGAL
MISC EXPENSES
POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER
NAME BADGES
$5v4'?4.43
PAGE 7
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$65.81
EXCESS LOSS PRcMiUM-AUGUST
$63.3T
$612..77
$9.45
59.45*
$2,364.71
$29364.71*
$20.00
$20.oQ -
***TOTAL**
55,494.43}
BROOKFIELD
EXCESS LOSS PRcMiUM-AUGUST
$79374.16
EXCESS LUSS PREMIUM -SEPT
S7,293.21.)
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 8/20/90
$209059.73
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 8/21/90
$77,862.08
MEDILAL CLAIMS THRU 8/28
$5,705.37
$118,194.59*
HAND SURGERY ASSOCIATES, S.C.
SERVICES RENDERS-DAHLBERG
$165.00
$165.0$
HMO ILLINOIS
FILTH INS SEPTEMBER
$6,349.57
$6*349.57
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$124,709.10
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$2249709.16
INSPECTION SERVICES
ANDERSON PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL $65.00
PEST CONTROL $2tO.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/30140
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TuTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PEST CONTROL
$240.00
$545.00
B E H INDUSTRIES
MAPS L PLATS
$138.60
$138.60
BLAIR BUSINESS SEKVICES,, INC.
TEMP HELP -KOLL R
$432.00
$432.00
COMPUTERLAND
HP TUNER
$186.00
$186.00
CUNSTRUCTION SPEC. INSTITUTE
MEMBERSHIP DUES
$185.07
'$185.00
HARPER COLLEGE
REGIJTRATION-FRONTZAK
$105.00
$105.00
IAMFES
14EMBERSHIP RENEWAL
547.00
$47.00
DREW JOHANSON
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$175.00
$175.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
5.85
a
MISC EXPENSES
$8.54
#
MISC EXPENSES
$63.85
$73.24V
KELLY P. REYNOLDS L ASSOCIATES
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$75.00
575.00
FREDRIC TENNYSON
CLOTHING ALLOWA"4CE
$79.16
$74.18
CHRISTINE VANUORNICK
CLOTnIN6 SUPPLIES
$40.37
$40.37
XEROX CORP.
MTCE CONTRACT
$48.87
548.87
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
82vi80.26
GENERAL FUND
$Zi1ct0.26
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PAKTS
$310.68
$310.68
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$119.20
$114.213
MICHAEL BARRETT
TRNG EXPENSES
574.95
$74.45
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH66-JT-5422-A
$7.60
9$7.60
JAMES EGELSTON
RECRUIT-TRNG EXPENSES
$314.00
$314.00
HEWLETT PACKARD
MTCE AGREEMENT
$545.8L
MTCE AGREEMENT
$92.40
$688.20
ICMA
PUBLICATIONS
$51.80
$51.80
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
061 4 15 G
537.83
328 i 15 G
$30.63
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
JAMES D. LANGE
LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC.
LITTLE AMERICA
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS G OFFIC
MINUTEMAN PRESS
JOE MITCHELL BUICK* INC.
CARLOS MITCHEM
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
RAY O*HERRON CO.* INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
QUICK PRINT PLUS* INC.
JOHN E. REID AND ASSOCIATES
SAVE -A -PET
RODNEY SMITH
WEST PUBLISHING CU.
POLICE DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30190
PURLHASE DESCRIPTION
750 9 15 G
EXPENSE.:"
PHOTO SUPPLIES
PRISuNER FOOD
SUPPLIES
BUSINESS CARDS-DAHLBERG
AUGUST CAR RENTAL
EXPENSES
PHYSICALS
SQUAD EMERGENCY EQUIPMENT
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
MISC EXPENSES
STRAYS JULY 90
PRI:'NTING SERVICES
REGISTRATION - GIBSON
STRAYS -JULY 90
EXPENSES
IL CRIMINAL CODE BOOKS
$5*957.12
PAGE 9
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$134.76
$203.22
$54.60
$54.60
$109.97
$109.97
$168.35
$168.35
$37.65
$37.6'5
$21.00
$21.00
$100.00
SIOU.00
$92.80
$92.80
$616.00
$616.00
$923.19
$923.19
536.25
$36.254,
$12.75
,
$22.20
x
$58.09
$25.07
a
$14.50
$10.00
55.90
$5.05
$8.00
5161.56
$871.00
$871.00
193.30
$93.30
$325.00
$325,00
5350.00
$350.00
$92.80
$92.80
$134.00
$134.00
***TOTAL** $5057.12
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6!30!90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE 6 EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
EDWARD CAVELLO
UNIFORM ALLOWANCE
$300.00
$300.00
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
SERVICE
$37.46
SERVICE
3[5.68
SERVICE
$51.28
SERVICE
$14.62
SERVICE
$46.24
$175.1
CHICAGO LUMMU NICATION SERVICE♦
SERVICES RENDERt0
s260.00
5260.0,.
COURTESY HOME CENTER
SUPPLIES
15.99
$5.99
CUTTER'S EDGE
EQUIPMEIIT
$244.67
5244.67
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
$96.59
PARTS
$58.25-
PARTS
$102.79
$141.13
STEVEN DUMOYICH
REGISTRATION-DUMOVICH
520.00
EXPENSES
s50.OU
670.00
ELK GROVE TOWNSHIP FIRE DEPT.
DIVE TAGS
szo.00
$20.00
FORCE 4
DATA CARTRIDGE
6111..94
$111.94
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
SERVICE TIRES
$77.73
577.73
N. W. GRAINGER INC.
EQUIPMENT
$539.44
5539.44
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
SUPPLIES
$139.81
$139081
H R HART PHOTO
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$244.42
6244.42
HANDY ANDY HOME CENTER
SUPPLIES
6345.97
$345.97
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CU.
424 9 15 G
5192.14
113 9 15 G
$75.08
061 9 15 G
537.82
575 9 15 G
$412.05
244 9 15 G
$24.34
244 9 15 G
$19.79
6761.22
ILLINUIS FIRE CHIEFS ASSN.
REGISTkATION - DUMOVICH
5150.00
$150.00
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTORS ASSN.
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$5.00
FIRE TkN G PROGRAM
$5.00
$10.00
INT#L. SOC. OF FIRE SERVICE IN
DUES-IPSEN
$60.00
560.00
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL# INC
PARTS
$9.07
$9.b7
tUKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS G OFFIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
s1i5.31
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$63.75
$179.06
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
EQUIPMENT
$299.86
EQUIPMENT
S12I.6a
VENDOR
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
MOTOROLA: I NC .
MOUNT PROSPECT LIONS CLUB
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
NATIONAL SAFETY CUUNCIL
NORTHLASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSI
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
ORDER FROM HORDER
RESCUE TECH
SCHWAAB• INC.
TRISTAR INDUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN.
WESTERN DETROIT DIESEL -ALLISON
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUNO
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
EQUIPMENT
PARTS
CHARGER E 3ATTERIES
SUPPLIES
ORGANILATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
MEM8'�iFSriIP RENEWAL
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
FITNESS EVALUATIONS
FITNESS EVALUATIONS
3 VISITS JULY 90
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ONE YEAR SUBSCRIPTION
STAMPS
REPAIR PARTS
PARTS
INVOICE AMOUNT
$117.95
$115.00
$71.83
$158.94
$70.00
55.75
$129.49
$106.90
$5.11
5127.94
$24.58
1354.19
587.34-
$24.49
$19.29
$5.20
$150.00
$55.91
$It120.00
$1t 155.00
$225.00
$39.15
$25.00
$57.70
$20.28
$529.89
***TOTAL**
$89310.68 CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND
PAGE it
TOTAL
(`539.49
$115.00
$230.77
$7a.aa
$715.60
$205,.91
$29275.00
$225.00
339.1
$25.00
$57.70
$20.28
$529.89
$81895.12
$584.44
VENDOR
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/40
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SERVICLS RENDERED-SEPTcMBER
$281299.00
PAGE 1Z
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$281299.00 $28-9294.00
###TOTAL#r. $281299.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.IINC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES $510.00 $510.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ***TOTAL** $510.00
GENERAL FUND $510.00
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
CONNIE CARLSON
CDBG-1301 MALLARD LN
$287.92
$267.92
CENTRAL PLUMBING; CO.
C06G-3i,� N OWEN ST
$750.00
$750.00
CRAIN*S CHICAGO BUSINESS
5UB5CRIPILON RENEWAL
$96.00
$98.00
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS LISTS
RANDOM LISTS OF MP RESIDENTS
$215.00
$215.00*
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
5.45
$.45#
QUALEX* INC.
FILA! E PROCESSING
$25.61
FILM E PROCESSING
$2.47
FILM C PROCESSING
$3.8T
S36.95
RICK'S ELECTRIC R.R.G.POWERIIN
CDBG-316 N OMEN ST
$800.OG
$800.00
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
321188.32
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND 5349.95 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT $Iv838.37
STREET DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS 31.92'
Si2I.95
PARTS
x12.54
PARTS
$71.2b
PARTS
310.33
PARTS
$69.09
PARTS
AM -LIN PRODUCTS• INC.
HOSE
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES* IN
SUPPLIES
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY
UNIFORM SERVICE
$76.66
UNIFORM SERVICE
$5.15
UNIFORM SERVIC€
ANDERSON 'LOCK COMPANY
LOCK S KEYS
$37.39
KEYS
$78.20
KEYS
$15.77
KEYS
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
PARTS
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
SUPPLIES
CHRIS ASKELAND
REIMS CDL LICENSE
TRACY BANGART
REIMS COC LICENSE
BETH BEHRENS
REIMB GOC LICENSE
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
PARTS
BRISTOL HOSE C FITTING
SUPPLIES
$133.82
SUPPLIES
$29.23
SUPPLIES
JOSE CASTRO
ADVANCE EXPENSES
CENTURY LABS/PRO CLEAN* INC.
SUPPLIES
x141.05
SUPPLIES
x255.55
SUPPLIES
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
WATEk USAGE_ CHARGE
CITRON CHEMICAL• INC.
SUPPLIES
Si2I.95
x12.54
$71.2b
310.33
$69.09
$287.09
s106.16
$106.16
$70.44
$70.44
$77.60
$76.66
$5.15
$159.41
SIZ4.3O
$37.39
$78.20
$15.77
$255.66
x119.20
$119.x€
533.00
S33.O0
$20.00
x20.00
$20.00
$20.00
x20.00
$20,00
S38.OZ
538.02
$179.92
$133.82
$29.23
$342.97
$50.00
$50.00
$95.70
x141.05
x255.55
x592.34
$81.13
$81.18
$141.39
VILLAGE OF !MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30!90
PAGE 14
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
FRANK CLESEN AND SONS• INC.
ARTHUR CLESENI INC.
CUMMUDORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
R. L. CORTY L COMPANY
PHILIP D°APPLEY
DECKER SUPPLY CO -9 INC.
DES PLAINES GLASS COMPANY
DOMBROWSKI E HOLMES* INC.
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
MARGARET URANGINES
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
LAURA ELLIOTT
LAURA ENGEL
F L V CEMENT CONTRACTORS
JUDY FELL
JOHN FERGUSON
FORBES INCORPORATED
FOREST TREE SERVICE• INC.
GNB$ INCORPORATED
ERNIE HAIN TOOLS SALES
THOMAS A. HENK
ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK E EQUIPMENT
INGRAM ENTERPRISES♦ INC.
NELS J. JL14NSUN
BERNARD E. JUNOKAS
KAR PRODUCTS INC
SUPPLIES
TREE HUSH FLWR REPL
MATERIALS
SUPPLILS
CLNG SEKVICE
CLNG SERVICE -PISTOL RANGE
SF 30 -JT -1 7U06
BF 30 -JT- 17006
PARTS
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
SIGN MAKING MATERIAL
MICE SUPPLIES
CATCH !3ASIN CLNG-FINAL PMT
PARTS
RE LMB CJL LICENSE
MTCE TIRES
MTCE TIRES
REIMB CJL LICENS-`
REIMB CDL LICENSE
1990 CURB L GUTTER PROGRAM
SUPPLIES
REIMB CDL LICENSE
SERVICES RENDERED
TREE RE'MOVAL
TREE REMOVAL
SUPPLIES
REPAIRS
SJW REPL SHARE COST
PARTS
TURF MOWING
TURF MOWING
TURF MU'K ING
TURF MOWING
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
STORM SEWER REPAIRS
SUPPLIEi
S292.50
5433.69
$32.50
$32.50
x144.00
5160.60
5304.60
s11836.0u
$64.00
$1x900.0('
$92.65
$99.92
$192.57
$197.80
5137.80
$61.50
$61.50
$690.00
1690.00
$99.00
$99.00
SiT#830.00
$171360.00
548.60
$,*8.60
510.00
$20.00
$21.00
$97.50
$118.50
$20.00
$20.00
$20.00
x20.00
5779034.60
$771034.60
$241.97
$241.97
$20.00
120.00
$292.50
5292.5
$11342.45
$189.60
51x532.05
$218.55
SZ18.55
$71.59
$71.59
$82.00
$b1.00
$173.86
$173.86
$700.00 "
570 0.00
$700.00
$700.00
52x600.00
$61$31.40
$6031.40
$12.00
$12.U0
$218.72
$213.72
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
KATHRYN KORN
KARL KUEMMERLING► INC.
tATTOF CHEVROLET* INC.
LENNY HOFFMAN EXCAVATING* INC.
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
SEN MEADOWS
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
MARK NEUGEBAUER
NORTHWEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER £
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
CARLA PATE
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PIP PRINTING
R.C. TOOL SALES
SIGN BUSINESS
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
STANDARD PIPE £ SUPPLY INC.
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
TRIALTA CONSTRUCTION, INC.
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
JEFFREY WAGNER
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
TIMOTHY WATERS
WAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLY CO.
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
WEST TOWN REFRIGERATIUN CORP.
VILLAGE JF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REIMS CUL LICENSE
$20.00
520.00
SUPPLItS
$995.50
$995.50
CAR RENTAL
$29222.27
$2*222.27
SCHiJENBc,CK RD RECONSTRUCTION
S18*785.64
$18*785.64
PART`,
$116.04
$116.0f
3MISC EQUIPMENT
$38.73
$38.7(
MATEkIALS
$318.15
3318.15
REIMS CDL LICENSE
$20.00
SZU.00
PARTS
$73.50
$73.50
PARTS
$33.16
$33.16
REIMS CUL LICENSE
320.00
120.00
TRAVtL £ EXPENSES
'$5.00
TRAVEL 6 EXPENSES
$2.15
a
TRAVEL £ EXPENSES
$90.82
$
TRAVtL £ EXPENSES
$4.96
TRAVEL £ SUPPLIES
315.28
TRAVEL £ SUPPLIES
$o7.09
$185.30*
SUPPLIES
$57.2$
357.28
PARTS
$21.80
321,80
SUBSLKiYTIuN
$26.00
$25.00
MTCE SUPPLIES
$8.26
MTCE SUPPLIES
(33.04
S"rI.3'
SUPPLIES
$40.10
SUPPLIES
$62.26
$102.36
MTCE SUPPLIES
$5.35
MTCE SUPPLIES
$97.86
$103.21
1989 CUef3 £ GUTTER PROGRAM -FINAL
3119121.74
311►12I.14
REGISTRATION - GASTRO
5825.0u
$825.00
REIMB CDL LICENSE
320.00
520.00
SUPPLIES
$59.70
$59.70
REIMB CDL 'LICENSE
S20.ou
3620.00
CHAI:'l SAWS
$330.0:;
$330.00
PARTS
$1.88
PARTS
$725.51
PARTS
530.16
$757.55
REPAIRS
$19023.0a
519023.06
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
PURCHASE OESCkIPTIUN
REPAIRS
56c9927.92 MOTOF FUEL TAX FUND
PAGE lb
INVOICE AMOUNT TJTAL
$403.34 $403.34
***TOTAL** $151?084.26
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $1.92
AMLSTRAND MARINE
AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY
W. E. ANDERSON
ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
BRISTOL HOSE E FITTING
CITRON CHEMICALS INC.
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERV. INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
THE FILM LIBRARY
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO
FREDRIKSEN E SONS
PARTS
PA RTS
EQUIP M'=NT
UNIFJRM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
SUPPLIES
PART
REPAIRS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIE=S
SUPPLIES
6380 -JT -23598
BH67-JT-1310-A
PARTS
,MTCE TIRES
PRIORITY LETTER
DELIVERY
RENTAL OF SAFETY FILM
PAYING AGENT SERVICES
EX TI"YGUI SHER SERVICE
$121.95
$102.81
5226.68
$i?120.93
$1S120.93
$17.59
$76.66
55.15
$159.40
$84.43
5114.43
$119.20
$119.20
$440.00
$440.00
$179.91
$133.83
$29..23
$342.91
5292.50
$Z'42.50
$25910.43
525910.43
$146.55
$146.55
$48.60
548.60
$55.00
$55.00
$15.50
$11.50
$27.00
$8I.Ou
$61.00
$150.00
5150.00
$20.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8!30190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
WATEK AND SEWER DIVISION
PAGE 17
INVOICE AMOUNT
EXTINGUISHER SERVICE
GE SUPPLY
SUPPLIti
GNB9 INCORPORATED
SUPPLIES
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER EXCHANGES
$378. 18
WATER MITER LABOR
3200.12
WATER METER MATERIAL
$153.81
WATER METER EXCHANGES
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
424 9 11.3 B
$30.63
455 9 15 G
$203.83
068 9 15 G
$533.12
660 9 15 B
$37.04
774 9 15 G
$30.63
U13 9 15 G
$30.63
210 9 15 G
$61.25
U44 9 82 G
$97.32
153 4 15 G
S1T.41
575 9 15 G
$16.84
303 9 3G S
$23.79
338 9 15 G
$17.41
155 9 15 G
ILLINOIS ENVIR. PROT. AGENCY
REGISTRATION-MCINTOSH
KAR PRODUCTS INC
SUPPLIES
JERRY MCINTOSH
ADVANCE EXPENSES
MOTORULAr INC.
REPAIRS
JOHN MOUROUSIAS
REIMS COL LICENSE
NET MIDWEST* INC.
WATEK SAMPLES -JULY 90
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SS GULF 1W WAPELLA
524.80
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
PARTS
ELIZABETH OERTER
REIMS COL LICENSE
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
520.00
LEGAL NOTICE
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICE
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL E EXPO=NS' S
$53.38
TRAVEL C EXPENSES
Si.30
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
PAGE 17
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$20.00
$4U.00
$49.70
$49.70
5218.55
$218.55
$378. 18
3200.12
$153.81
$378.18
E19110.29
$30.63
$203.83
$533.12
$37.04
$30.63
$30.63
$61.25
$97.32
S1T.41
$16.84
$23.79
$17.41
$17.6[
$19117.52
$35.00
$35.00
$216.72
$218.7{
SZ50.00
$250.Oi1'-
$237.82
$237.82
$20.0,5
$20.00
$175.00
5175.00
524.80
;17.77
$41.157
$40.22
$40.22
$20.00
$20.00
520.00
$20.00
$20.OU
$60.00
$53.38
Si.30
$14.52
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
PIP PRINTING
PURTABLE TOOL SALES
k E R TRUCK SERVICE INC.
RAINBOW I HR PHOTO EXP.
RAPP'S
SIDENER 'SUPPLY COMPANY
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
DAVE WAGNER
WARNING IITES OF ILLINOIS
WASHINGTON* INC.
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
WINKELMANS RADIATOR CO.
WPCF CONFERENCE DEPARTMENT
ZIEdELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
MATER & SEWER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8130140
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
TkAVcL Z SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
FQUIPM jdT
REPAIRS
FILM PRJCESSING
FILM PRJCESSING
FILM PROCESSING
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
HYDRANTS PAINTED
SUPPLIES
REGISTi,ATION --kNDLER
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
REPAIRS
REPAIRS
REGISTKATIUN - ANDLER
PARTS
$13*416.23
MAGE I 8
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
x30. 3h
a
$ 6.42
SZ5.06
3181.04*
$57.27
$57.17
$5.75
`*5.75
$241.23
$241.1"
36.89
328.16
$2.37
$37.42
$155.65
$74.01
$234.6$
$255.53
$632.00
$8J7.53
$17.12
'617.11
515.00
$15.00
$61.92
$61.91
$250.00
5250.00*
S7. 3Z
522.50
$22.50
$52.32
$95.00
$476.14
$571*14
3390.0v
$390.0
$573.75
$573.75
***TOTAL**
$139416.23
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS CLNG SEKVICE $140.00 $14U.00
VENDOR
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE dJ30/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TJTAL
bH66-JT-0498-A 818.42
3H66 -JT -3710-A $7.60
SH66-JT-5262-A $138.83
3H66 -JT -5266-C Slb5.15
BH65-JT-7498-A $18-42 $348.�t2,-
19 E NORTHWEST HWY $7.50 57.501,.
***TOTAL** 5495.92
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 54')5.9Z
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
RESOURCE RECYCLING SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL 532.00 532.00
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHARGE $81041.O0 $8v091.00
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** 589IZ3.00
GENERAL FUND $d#123.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
BRUCE MUNICIPAL EQUIPMENT INC
EQUIPMEdT
$78x400.82
57de400.8Z
COOK COUNTY COLLECTOR
08-12-110-001-0000
S1036.55
08-12-1i0-002-ODUO
$415.37
a
08-12-102-OZ3-0000
$844.51
$2s996.43*
HENRICKSEN
EQUIPMENT
$ZvO17.00
$Zr017.00
LIFT SYSTEMS, INC.
EQUIPMENT
$9v 900. Of)
(9,900.00
VENDOR
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
THE PERFECT IMAGE
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPt. FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30!40
PURCHASE DESCRIPTIO
INVOICE AMOUNT
PRINTS -PUBLIC SAFETY BLDG $128.76
***TOTAL**
$2ri51.92 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND
52*145.78 DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT CONST 1485
PAGE 20
lei "T,
$128.78
$939443.03
$88,300.82
$844.51
ra��zcxsca�aaas��x�aaaa��aaz�#�aas�aaaa�s�a�a��r��ar$��xaaaurr��aa��xuaa�xaYs�x�s:�as��a��xs���xaau��a���:#a���x�a�xas���ar�
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH
EDISON
8G2i-jf-1338-A
$662.71
5662.71
COMMONWEALTH
EDI'SON
8H o7 -JT -3858-B
$7.60
$7.60
F OLGERS FLAG
E DECORATING* INC
1990 Cl+ ISTMAS VECORATIONS
i2*833.00
$2*333.00
STEVEN R. JENKINS
CO.• INC.
SUPPLIES
$220.00
52cu.00
PETTY CASH -
POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
56.00
$6.00*
COMMUNITY AND
CIVIC SERVICES
**QTOTALaa
$3*729.31
GENERAL FUND $3*729.31
r�a�x�raaos�$aaa�:.aasaa��z�a�aaa��aYsx�z�a�a��a��ar��r�asYaz�aaa�aaau�a�r a���s�saaz�auaaaa����az�aa*���zx�a araz�au
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO SERVICES RENDERED $150.00 $150.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FLOOD LUAN INTEREST 0 91'1/90 $686.41
FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL D 9/1/90 s2*957.32 $3*643.73
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS *,VaTOTAL*# $3*793.73
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 8/30/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TUTAIL
GENERAL FUND $39b43.73 CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 & 1 1973 S150000
PENSION FUNDS
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS. WITHHOLDING TAXES SZOO.00 $200.00*
CHARLES W. NICK AUGUST PENSION $883.22 $883.22*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT SEPTEMBER MEDICAL INS $433.67 $433.67v,
PAUL H. WATKINS AUGUST DISABILITY CK $19533.16 $19533.16*
PENSION. FUNDS ***TOTAL** $3v050.05
GENERAL FUND $883.22 BENEFIT TRUST -2Z 529166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL 5190689466.48
DATE RUN $130/90
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE ZZ
TIME RUN 12.21.06
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING I0—APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 3!30190
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
1
GENERAL FUND
$5579719.93
22
MOTOR FULL TAX FUND
$88/156.34
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$39300.44
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
iiivOT0.69
31
BENEFIT TRUST +.2
$29166.83
41
WATER E SEWER FUND
$559529.46
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$19006.05
48
MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND
$8893JO.82
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$1249709.16
Si
CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND
327730.22
55
DOWNTOWN REJEVLPMT LONST 1985
$149765.79
60
CORPORATE PURPOSES B E 1 1973
$150.00
T1
POLICE PENSION FUND
339,548.81
TZ
FIREMEN•S PENSION FUND
5419684.19
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
S37e5T8.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $190b8,466.98
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce works with the
business community to advance the civic, economic, industrial,
professional and cultural welfare of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, chambers of commerce have contributed to the civic
and economic life in Illinois for more than 150 years since
the founding of the Galena Chamber of Commerce in 1838; and
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois is home to international
chambers of commerce, the central region office of the U.S.
Chamber of commerce, the Illinois State Chamber of Commerce
and more than 300 local chambers of commerce; and
WHEREAS, the chamber of commerce and its members provide
Citizens with a strong business environment that increases
employment, the retail trade and commerce, and industrial
growth in order to make the Village of Mount Prospect a better
place to live; and
WHEREAS, the chamber of commerce encourages the growth of
existing industries, merchants and services, and encourages
new firms and individuals to locate in the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the state and local chambers of commerce act as
liasons between governmental entities and the business
community in order to foster better relations;
THEREFORE I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount
Prospect proclaim SEPTEMBER 30 through OCTOBER 6, 1990 as
CHAMBER OF COMMERCE WEEK and call its significance to the
citizens of the Village of Mount Prospect.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. A. Fiel�ds���
Village Clerk
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, We the People did ordain and establish a
Constitution for the United States of America to secure
the blessings of liberty for ourselves and our posterity;
and
WHEREAS, it is important that all citizens fully
understand the provisions, principles and meaning of the
Constitution so they can support, preserve and defend it
against encroachment; and
WHEREAS, the Bicentennial of the Constitution provides
an historic opportunity for all Americans to learn about
and to reflect upon the rights and privileges of
citizenship and its responsibilities; and
WHEREAS, the President and the Congress of the United
States have designated the week of September 16 - 23 as
"CONSTITUTION WEEK;" and
WHEREAS, the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect
enjoy the blessings of liberty, the guarantees of the
Bill of Rights, equal protection of the law under the
constitution, and the freedoms derived from it.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, mayor of the Village
of Mount Prospect, in cooperation with the Commission on
the Bicentennial of the United States Constitution, do
hereby proclaim September 16, 1990 as CITIZENSHIP DAY and
the week of September 16 - 23, 1990 as CONSTITUTION WEEK,
and invite every citizen and institution to join in the
national commemoration.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. -Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 4th day of September, 1990.
MICHAEL J. MORAN
A"ORNtY Al LAWb, i.AST Nof*"SST H#OHWAv — SwITE 10w
MOUNT PROau►atCT IWNCW$ a
(708) 577.8556
August 31, 1990
Mayor barley and pillage Trustees
100 South Emerson
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mayor Parley and village Trustees:
This letter is in reply to Everette Hills response to the Mt.
Prospect Chamber of Commerce letter of August 16, 1990 concerning
the proposed ordinance to amend Section 13.124 of Chapter 13 of the
Village Code. Mr. Hill and I have been unable to confer by
telephone as each of us has placed numerous calls to the other only
to find him unavailable.
In the August 16, 1990 letter, the Chamber unintentionally mis-
stated the proposed ordinance by indicating that the automatic stay
provision currently in effect would be entirely taken away. In
fact* the ordinance only reduced the time period allowed from 20
days as now provided by statute to 72 hours. This alone would
create a situation where momentary indecision, while conferring
with counsel concerning an appeal, would cause a licensee to lose
his right to appeal.
More important, however, is the fundarental problem of the
elimination of the Illinois Liquor Control Commission from the
appeal process. The statement in the Chamber's letter to the
effect that the proposed ordinance would not be constitutional is
valid. The constitution provides Jr. relevant part at Article VTI,
Section 6 that, "(i) Howe -rule units away exercise and perform
concurrently with the state any power: or function of a home -rule
unit to the extent that the General Assembly by law does not
specifically limit the concurrent exercise or specifically declare
the state's exercise to be exclusive.,
The Legislative Committee on Local Government added in the
committee comments that;
"(Subsection 6(1)) makes clear that if the state legislates but
does not express exclusivity, home -rule units retain the power to
act concurrently, sub`ect to limitations rovided b
last phrase rEferring to statutory limitations is intend o cover
the case where the legislature intends to permit concurrent local
legislation, but QA1Y within limits that are consist y
state statu----iLib
4—me�, surely if the state is permitted to
exclude local governments from areas where the state has acted it
also should be able to restrict the nature and extent of concurrent
local activity.)
Mayor Farley and Village Trustees
Page -2-
August 31, 1990
" The Solution proposed here is novel and unique. it
proposes, as it must, to preserve state sovereignty when the
General Assembly expresses its intent to prohibit local government
activity. But absent such an expression of intent, local
governments are left free to QoMolgM=t t s a The
purpose of distinguishing between statutes which express
exclusivity and those which do not is to minimize the area where
courts might have to struggle to find legislative intent. It is a
guideline to the courts that concurrent local action is to be
permitted unless a contrary legislative intent is expressed."
Hence any attempt by a municipality to exact legislation in
conflict with a state statute, wherein the state has indicated an
attempt to limit the power of the local unit, is unconstitutional.
The Liquor Control Act gives certain powers and duties to both the
Liquor Control Commission and to the Local Liquor Commissioner.
The legislature has clearly expressed itself in giving to the Local
Commissioners only a certain range of powers enumerated in that act
(Sections 3-12, 4-11 4-2, 4-4, 6-2). The statute is full of
references to the effect that the municipalities may act within
this grant of authority only to the extent those actions are 'not
inconsistent with this Act" or "not inconsistent with law"
(Section 4-1). The local municipalities therefore are proscribed
from enacting legislation which goes outside of the authority
granted to them or which is inconsistent with the state statutory
scheme.
The proposed ordinance at hand attempta to take away one of the
powers and duties of the Liquor Control Commission expressed in
Section 7-9 which states in relevant part:
'Sec. 7-9. Except as provided in this Section, any order or action
of a local lictuor control commissioner levying a fine or refusing
to levy a fine on a licensee, granting or refusing to grant a
license, revoking or suspending, or refusing to revoke or suspend a
license or refusing for more than 30 days to grant a hearing upon
a complaint to revoke or suspend a license may, within 20 days
after notice of such order or action, be appealed by any resident
of the political subdivision under the jurisdiction of the local
liquor control commissioner or any person interested, to the State
Commission."
To enact an ordinance which directly contradicts this clear
statutory direction by the legislature would be an exercise of
power not permitted by the constitution.
Mayor Farley and Village Trustees
Page -3-
August 31, 1990
Mr. Hill reasons that because in one section of the Act (Section 6-
18). the legislature clearly claimed exclusive authority to
regulate the drinking age, the fact that it did not make such an
express claim of exclusivity in every other section of the act
indicates an intent to allow municipalities free reign to legislate
as they desire. This logic is faulty. It seems clear that in
other areas of the statute it was the legislature's intent to give
municipalities authority to legislate concurrently with the state
in a manner not inconsistent with the statutory scheme. It would
also seem evident that the reason the state made its claim of
exclusivity concerning the legal drinking age in Section is
that a previous version of Section 4-1 allowed municipalities the
discretion to determine whether people under the age of 21 could
handle alcohol.
Aside from the question of whether the Village has the authority to
enact such an ordinance are the practical considerations. The
Illinois Liquor Control Commission has virtually promised that it
will oppose such an ordinance in the courts at great expense to all
concerned. when we take into consideration the fact that in the
last four years only two local decisions have been appealed and
only one has been overruled, the need for such an ordinance seems
lacking.
Please bear in mind that the above opinion is my own and does not
necessarily represent the views of the Mt. Prospect chamber of
Commerce as I have not yet had an opportunity to confer with the
Chamber.
Very truly yours,
Michael J. Moran
MJM/du
GLASS, HILL, D kLLx-F-YER & ROTR, LTD.
ATTOR--rEYS AT LAA
F_VrJZXTT1! M. 11ILL, _iR. 8;>9 sicoicrE 73ovrxxvaAD or
3 DnLL!Zryzv 7W, LEY Vi1- GI-LSS"
-r=AZL M. POTU 564 - 8OLf.;
P4cm,VTi,zrua
TO: Mr. John N.Xon
Village of mount Prospect
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr.
DATE: August 21, 990
RE: Mt, Prospect Chamber of Commerce
Letter of August 16, 1990
I have reviewed tlae above stated lette--. The entire f-4.rst
page of the letter -_,nfortunately addresses an issue which does not
exist. The letter assumes that * the proposed ordinance takes away
the auto7lnatic stay l a suspens-
ion order on appeal.. This is not
,�:)
the case. our ordinance provides for an automatic stay upon
notification that a licensee intends to appeal the Local
Commissioner's decision, to the C`rcuit Court. The Chamber also
argues that the proposed ordinance will have a negative affect on
the system of checks and bal'ITICIP-S- such is not the case. The
system of checks and balances that: is fundamental to our government
involves the balance of authority among the legislative, 511diciRl
and executive branches of government. If one assumes that the
decisions 0-4 the Liquor Control commissioner are execlative
functions, the checks and balances are still 4W, place because under
our ordinance the judiciary retains the right of review over any
I
decision of the Local Liquor Control Commis loner. - current review
by the State Liquor Commission injects an artificial and
nnecessary layer '
into the syster. of checks and balances. The
u
checks and balances argumer-t that the chamber has made in this
instance Is not applicable.
The second page of the .setter refers to an opinion of Jim
Adanazis, legal county el to the Illinois Liuvor Control Commission
that our proposed ordinance Is "not =nstitZ1tJ_cna"1'-. The validity
or invali-ii1ty of our ordinance has nothing to do with the
Constitution. if it were invalid, it would be invalid because it
is in conflict with a state law which requires that appeals from
i.ocal L4-q"Qr commissioners go to the State Liquor COM11nissicn- As
a , om -p h
41 a -rule �run4cipajity, Mt. Pros act I
as the right to legislate
in any area even if that legislations is in conflict with state law
uriless the Sate jag,islatura has expressly Prr:eLAPted the home rola
rauni.cipalit-.' from in that area. ;^ ere —has A—Z—a—D
C
.�,LASS, _1417UL, 1jA.1J_N1rYER & ROTH, LTT>.
Mr. John Dixon
August 21, 1990
Page ')
There have been cases in %ti-ich the Illinois courts have held
that despite a lack of express preerpt-ive language that preamption
r if legislature has evidenced an intent to
may be assumed I the .1
preenipr local municipalities. The opposite Is true with the
Illinois L'-quor Code. The Illinois Liquor Code contains specific
preemptive language forLidding home rule municipalities from
adopting ordinances which would penaill the sale of alcohol to
persons under 21. If the State legislature intended the entire
State Liquor Code to be preemptive of home ri_,le authority, why
would it then have used specific preeizLptive langu4ge forbidding
home rule units from reducing the drinking age.
1 have had yluirteroust conversatiorts with Mr. AdanaM4S with
respect to car proposed ordinance. Mr. Adanamis does not speak
with
certainty with respect to his position on our proposed
ordinance. It is his job to speak in defense of the jurisdiction
7
of the body which he represents. The State LiTuor Commission is
very jealous of its jurisdiction. As I have previously stated in
other ne-mos, that b.,48 aggressively a:talrtpted to expand
its ivrisdlvtion beyond its statutory limitations by dictating to
local Village Boards the number of 11craor licenses which it Taust
issue.
There is no other type of adrainistrative decision by a
municipality which is appealable to a state ,.Emission. Zoning
Board, Village Board, 111Pnsion Board and Fire and Police Commission
decisions, are all appealable directly to the Circuit Court. I
believe that appeals to the State Licfkior Comrniezzilon are an
unnecessary layer or bureaucracy. In light of the State
aggressve yttempts to dictate licrucy licensing policy
to Boards of Trustees, I think that the adoption of this ordinance
would be a wise decision.
17ChamCo.Mem
500 W. Central Road, Suite 104 - Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 - (312) 398-6616
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER
August zd, lyyO
Mayor Farley and village Trustees
100 South Emerson
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Mayor Farley and Village Trustees:
This letter cooceroo the Iat reading on August 7, I990 of a
proposed ordinance to amend Section I3.124 of Chapter 13 of the
Village Code. Our understanding,- is that this ordinance would
purport to change the status 'qun in regard to local liquor
commissions proceedings by eliminating the 1igunz license holder's
right toappeal an adverse ruling of the local liquor commission to
the Illinois Liquor Control Commission. Instead, the ordinance
provides that the only recourse available to an aggrieved license
holder would be an appeal to the Circuit Court of cook County, a
right which is currently available after an adverse ruling by both
the local liquor commissioner and the Illinois Liquor Control
Commission.
As a practical matter this would mean that the fate of a liquor
license holder and his ability todobusiness would be in the hands
of one person, which is the mayor, without an automatic stay of any
decision made in order to allow the license holder an opportunity
for a review of his decision by a separate uvuy' Recourse to the
state court would not be adequate because the business would suffer
immediate harm unless and until it can petition the court on an
emergency basis to obtain an injunction against the local
commissioner.
The Chamber of commerce believes that this action would be a
dangerous consolidation of power into the hands of one individual,
without an adequate system of checks and balances to prevent a
possible abuse of this pnwec. A system of checks and balances is
fundamental to our system ofgovernment and the Chamber of Commerce
feels that in this area, there should be no exception.
If the Village would propose an ordinance whereby one official
could take away the business license of any other type of business
owner without an effective review process, every citizen would be
outraged. we obooId not be blinded to this basic unfairness simply
because it is a liquor license holder's business that is involved
here. The ends should out be allowed to justify the means.
Mayor Farley and Village Trustees
August 16, 1990
Page -2-
Further, it is the opinion of James Adinamis, Chief Legal Counsel
of the Illinois Liquor Control Commission, that such a proposed
ordinance is not constitutional and its enactment would be sure to
bring on protracted litigation. It is his opinion that the right
to an appeal from the decision of a local liquor commission to the
State Liquor Commission is a right granted by Illinois statute in
an area pre-empted by the state legislature from local home rule
powers.
For these reasons, we feel that the ordinance sought to be enacted
should not be adopted in its present form.
Sincerely,
Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce
Governmental Affairs Committee
(�T.ASS, HILL, DALLME I -ER & ffiyrn, LTD.
-ktTORWEYS —kT "W
EvuaxT-xv 1A H:LL,,JR- dgl-,) Siroirta BOULEVARD
E B. DAL—v ER 600612
MiCJLiEL X R�-39 (700) 56-1-65010
F*11L A. Mai-.izzLLO FA.X (7043) 5941 3442
TO: Mr. John Dixon
Village of Mount Prospect
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr.
DATE: August 1*7, 1990
RE: State Liquor Commission Statistics
CD COGNseL
BRAMLET M. G" -S'
-ADMIM&L WZSCO-"M D-%kl
The Illinois State Liquor Commission has provided statistics
to me indicating that in the year 1987, 58 appeals were made to the
state Commission by licensee. of this 58, 24 decisions of the
Local Liquor commissioners were affirmed. in 1988, the total
number of appeals filed was 54 and 17 were affirmed. This means
that in all other cases, the decision of the Local Liquor
commissioner was changed in some way, either the finding of guilty
was reversed or the penalty assessed by the Local Liquor
Commissioner was reduced. The state Corz-ission has not yet
supplied us with the figures for 1989.
In the past four years in Mount Prospect, we have had two
decisions appealed to the State Commission. Both of these were
decisions made by the former Mayor Carolyn Krause. One decision
was affirmed and one was reversed in its entirety. The decision
which was affirmed is the Snuggery suspension of 30 days because
a bartender had sold cocaine to an undercover agent. The decision
which was reversed was an instance in which three young men went
into Ye Olde Town Tnn, one was 21, two were under 21. All three
stood at the bar. The 21 year old ordered a pitcher of beer with
three mugs. While standing at the bar, the two minors gave money
to the 21 year old to purchase the pitcher. The bartender came
back with a pitcher of beer and sat one mug in front of each
customer, including the two minors. The testimony was undisputed.
Carolyn found, as most rational people I believe would, that the
bar had made a delivery of an alcoholic beverage to minors. The
State Commission overturned that decision in effect saying that a
liquor licensee has no responsibility whatsoever to assure that
adults on their premises do not order alcohol for minors.
EH4,�1,_`IE
GLASS, 11ii-c, DALT INIEYER &- 13o-ra, LTi).
Mr. John Dixon
August 17, 1990
Page 2
The most trcubl ing decisions, that have core fram 'the State
Commission in re,,�.gjt years, however, involved their desire to
extend their jurisdiction beyond their statutory authority. Tinder
the rl,linois Liquor Code, the State Commission has authority only
to hear appeals from decisions of the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner. in other words, if a violation of the license is
alleged and a finding of guilty is made, the State Commission may
then take appeal with respect to the finding of guilty on the
violation. That is the State commission's sole authority.
Ho-4ever, in two recent cases, municipalities have refused to
increase the number of liquor',licenses in particular
classifications. These are decisions- which the Illinois Liquor
Code has reserved solely 1co the President and Board of Trustees of
municipalities. the legislative decisions of the President and
Board of Trustees are not appealable to an administrative body such
as the State Liquor commission. However, the state Liquor
commission has ignored this limitation on their authority and has
taken appeals from a particular attorney who represents the
Illinois Retail Liquor Dealers Association. in one instance, the
State commission actually ordered the President and Board of
Trustees of a particular municipality to create an additional
liquor license. Thus, paving the way fo'-,- the State Commission to
dictate the number of licenses that municipalities must have. The
second case is still pending before them.
i-iiLccAp.Mem
Village of rVicunt Prospect
Mount Prospm, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON Tit
FROM: EVERETTE M. HILL, JR., ESQ.
DATE: MAY 17, 1989
14
SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL ORDINANCE To PRO DE
FOR DIRECT APPEAL To CIRCUIT COURT
Please find attached a proposed Ordinance amending our Liquor Control Ordinance.
Also attached is an earlier memo describing the problem that the amendment will
address.
As you are aware, we have had no success with the legislators in achieving such a
Statewide amendment. I was told by the Northwest Municipal Conference that it
opposed by the Illinois Retail Liquor Dealers' Association.
It is'my opinion that the Village of Mount Prospect has the Authority to do this under
its Home Rule powers. The amendments provide as follows:
1. All appeals shall be directly to the Circuit Court, eliminating the State Liquor
Commission from the Appellate process.
2. The licensee will be granted an automatic. stay of any suspension or revocation
by filing a Notice of Intent to Appeal with the Village Clerk within 72 hours of the
Mayor's decision.
3. The Police Department will post the premises which have been suspended or
revoked.
EVERETTE M. HILL, JR.
EMH/rcw
attachment
Village cif r'cunt Prospect
Mount rrospect, Illinois 1 20
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: EVERETTE M. HHA, JR., ESQ.
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 29, 1990
SUBJECT: LIQUOR ORDINANCE
I have discussed with the Mayor items that we need to review concerning the liquor
Ordinance which would be appropriate to bring up sometime in the near future for a
Committee of the Whole meeting.
The first one is an Amendment to the liquor Control Ordinance to provide for 40at
Appeal to the Circuit Court. Since the Conference has not been successful in getting this
item in—fWe-Te-g—tsliuvepro—cess in Springfield, the Mayor feels it is appropriate for us to
review it again.
Secondly, I would also like to suggest that we place in our local Ordinance provisions
When the liquor Commissioner may determine
that a store should be closed for violations of the liquor Commission that we have a
provision that there be a Notice placed on the door prominently displaying that it is
closed by Order of the liquor Commissioner because of violation of the Local liquor
Ordinance. I would like to talk to you about placing this in our Local Ordinance as
well.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
JFD/rcw
GLASS, HILL, DALLMEYEB 45-ROTK, LTD. ;
Mayor Carolyn Krause
June 11, 1987
Page 2
3. Perhaps the most distasteful aspect of the current
system is that if the State Commission overrules the Local
C =nissioner and the Local Commissioner wishes to appeal that
overruling order, then the Illinois Attorney General represents
the State Commission in that appeal. Effectively, we are left
with a situation where all of the prestige and resources of the
Attorney General's office (paid for by Illinois taxpayers) is
directed at defending the actions of a liquor licensee who has
already been found guilty by a Local Commissioner. The licensee
gets a free appellate lawyer at taxpayer expense! It is an
absurd and unequitable situation.
I am requesting that we attempt to recruit the Northwest
Municipal Conference and the Illinois Municipal League in an
effort to introduce and support such legislation.
If I can be of any help in accomplishing that, please let
me know.
Very truly yours,
/S/ Everette M. Iii&1, Jr.
EMhjr/hm Bvsrette M. Hill, Jr.
(jLASS, HILL,I)ALLXEYER & .ROTH, LTU.
Arrvigi%eYs wi "w
3aAAtsT -4. :i L.�3i' tlWo SKOKIE DVULZV'K,o w Cocwrw,
�`sxcrrc M' HILz,Ja %ozrHH$ooz, ILLivots Ctioos2 Mtstt.w L Ltrmwonx
'a,-z.vwe D D.atx eTcu (3421 644-8 10
.�4+1CR.6L K. RUtig
y VAA CnitllTL LL, Jti ' 4C YITTtD .„cowsri ilyD
June 11, !987
Mayor Carolyn Krause
village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: State of Illinois Liquor Control" Commission
Dear Mayor Krause:
we have on many occasions discussed the role° of the State
of Illinois Liquor Control Commission in reviewin4 decisions of
Local Liquor Control Commissioners. It has been= our mutual
ooservation that the State Commission shows little respect for
local control over liquor licenses. we have found that despite
legal constraints to the contrary, the State Commission eft
often substitutes its own opinions for the opinion of the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner.
It is my recommendation that we attempt to h#ve legislation
introduced in the General Assembly that would ej;iminate the
state Liquor Control Commission's review of Local Liquor
Commission decisions. If State Commission review were
eliminated, the licensee would appeal decisions of the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner directly to the Circuit Court. It
is my opinion that now would a good time to attemQt to get such
legislation introduced. In 1986 Governor Thompson had reviewed
the possibility of completely disbanding the Illinois Liquor
Control Commission. My recommendation does not go that far. It
would simply take them out of the review process.
I think this legislation is appropriate for, the following
reasons:
1. Most decisions of municipal officials are not
reviewatV.6 by a State Commission but rather are reviewable under
administrative review directly to the Circuit Court.
2. The State Commission has no sensitivity to local
concerns about matters involving the sale of alcohol,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING
PURSUANT TO THEIR HOME RULE POWERS:
SECTION ONE: That §13.124.C. of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by deleting
§13.124.0 in its entirety and substituting, therefore a new §13.124.0 and
§13.124.D., so that hereinafter said §13.124.0 and §13.124.D of Chapter 13 shall be
and read as follows:
C. Any appeal from a decision of the Village President, in his capacity
as Local Liquor Control Commissioner, shall be directly to the Circuit
Court of Cook County, pursuant to Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter
110, Article III, Administrative Review; There shall be no appeal to the
Illinois Liquor Commission. If the licensee intends to appeal a
suspension or revocation of license, the licensee must file a Notice of
Intent to Appeal with the Village Clerk within 72 hours of receipt of the
Suspension or Revocation Order. The filing of said Notice of Intent to
Appeal shall stay the Suspension or Revocation Order until the 36th day
after entry of the order if no Appeal is filed or upon entry of an Order
from the Circuit Court of Cook County if an Appeal is filed. The
failure to file said Notice of Intent to Appeal shall not deprive the
licensee of the right to appeal to the Circuit Court of Cook County, but
there shall be no automatic stay of an Order of Suspension or Revoca-
tion.
D. Twenty-four (24) hours before the commencement of any suspension
or revocation, the Mount Prospect Police Department shall post on all
entrances to the licensed establishment a notice that the premises is
prohibited from selling or delivering alcoholic beverages by Order of the
Mount Prospect Local Liquor Control Commissioner for violation of the
Mount Prospect Village Code.
The Notice shall be in letters not less than one-half (1/2) inch high and
shall in the case of a suspension give the times of the suspension and in
the case of a revocation state the exact time which the revocation goes
into effect.
The removal of said notice before the suspension ends by any person is
prohibited and shall subject the person to a fine of not less than $200.00
nor more than $1,000.00."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided
by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of
Village President
1990.
Village of ,-,,.,,cunt Prospect
,Mount Prospect, Illinois 2a
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 30, 1990
SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE REQUEST - CLASS W - SIZZLER RESTAURANT,
110 EAST RAND ROAD
Sizzler Restaurants International, Inc., has taken over the operations of the Mount
Prospect franchise as part of a re -taking of 22 restaurants in the Chicago area that the
franchise owner was not paying franchise fees. The Sizzler Corporation wishes to have
a Class W Liquor License for this facility again as there was one in the past, however,
the recent franchisee was cutting funds and did not reapply for the Class W License this
last year.
On May 18, Sizzler Restaurants International took over the 22 sites in the Chicago area
and closed 12 of them; 10 of them remain open; the other ones are being remodeled.
At this point in time, they have not made a decision on whether they Will remodel the
facility in Mount Prospect as they may look for another site in Mount Prospect to build
a new facility.
Sizzler has a policy of serving drinks only with food and they will only serve two drinks
per patron. That way, they do not have problems with people being over -served. They
are establishing a State Certified Liquor Service course which they are giving to all of
their people on site. I talked with the representative of the Sizzler corporation from
California, Mr. Tom Wilscam and he will be present at the meeting on September 4.
It is my understanding that he will request that they be granted the License as soon as
possible so that they can proceed with serving liquor.
JOHN FULTON 9WON
JFD/rcw
attachment
14�
RENEWAL
fl
DA�E
Non -Refundable Application Fee for issuance of am
Liquor license, one-time only tee)
Honorable Gerald L Farley, Village President
and Local Liquor Control Commissioner
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as
Section 13.1031 passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th da of
January, 1957, as amended, regulating sale Of alcoholic liquors in the Village of y
Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois: Mount
The undersigned, sizzler Restaurants International, Inc.
hereby makes app-M..n for a Class w liquor dealer's license or the periodendingApril 30, 19 91 , and tenders the SUM Of 1 15 00.00
forth in the following:— —, the Prescribed fee as set
SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CL ASSES OF
RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES
(SECTION 13.106):
Annual Fee
CLASS A: Retail package and consumption on premises
$ 2,500.00
CLASS B: Consumption on premises only
2,000.00
CLASS C: Retail package only
2,000,00
CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal
organizations; consumption on premises only
750.00
CLASS E: Caterer's license
2,000.00
CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine;
limited number of special events to include
full service bar facilities-, consumption
on
premises only
00.00
CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment
2,000.00
CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges;
retail package and consumption on premises
2500.00
,
CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non
-
refrigerated beer and wine only - no
consumption on premises
1,750.00
CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only
2,000.00
CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge
2,500.00
CLASS T: Bowling Alley
2,500.00
CLASS V: Retail package - wine only
1,500.00
CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only
and at dining tables only
1,500.00
SURETY BOND REQUIRED
1,000.00
EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL
Your petitioner, .-iZz��zj,er Restauratnts Internatio�
�
nal, Inc,sizzler Restaurant,1 doing
business as
permission Tooperate a retail liquor business �.pzi__..
Respectfully
at 110 F_ Iand Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois.
requests
Description and name of premises: Sizzler Restaurant it 366 110 E. Rand Rd., Mt. Prospect
60056
Restaurant is a one story, free standing building, approximately 4900 square feet,
with frontage of 79 feet and depth of 62 feet.
(Description must be complete as to floor area, frontage, etc.)
Is applicant owner of premises: No
If not owner, does applicant have a lease? —yes State date applicant's lease expires:
1.995 — If not owner, attach copy ofTease hereto. Enclosed
Does applicant have a management contract with another person or entity for the
operation or management of the licensed premises? No
If so, state the name and address of the manager or management company. N/A
(Ile manager or management company must complete
the same application as the owner).
Is applicant an individual, a/�9-_—rp-dr-aTj-6co -partnership or an association? (Circle one)
Wa
If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number:
If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social
Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof:
If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership:
If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: DE 08-13-85
If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date
qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois:
12-02-85
If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social
Security Numbers of Officers and Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of
birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than
5% of the stock of such corporation. Sizzler Restaurants Intl. Inc. is a publicly traded
Corporation on the NASDAQ exchange. Only Collins Foods Int'l.Inc. owns more than 10'/ stc
OFFICE AND/OR
PERCENT OF
NAME ADDRESS STOCK HELD
see attached lists for Officers & Diroytor.,
Date of Birth: — Social Security # Phone #
Collins Foods International, Inc. 12655 W. Jefferson Blvd. Los Angeles, CA 90066
213-827-2300 FEIN: 95-2552087 Stock ownership: 65%
Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone #
Morgan Grenfel Capital 'Management Co. 885 Third Ave., New York, NY 10022
Stock ownershio. 6.4%
Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone #
(Additional information to be included on a separate listing.)
Objects for which orgai_,tion is formed: To operate and �_-anchise restaurants
If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or
any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been
0004owdv( a Aaowar iq ausdemeartero f *
Sizzler Restaurant ,§ Int 1. Inc. is a*pubttct7-tmtdcor%p-"r?tion.
Officers & Directors: No Shareholders: Do not know
If applicant is an individual, state age: N/A Marital status:
Is applicant a citizen of the United States? N/A If a naturalized, citizen, state date and
place of naturalization:
How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to
the filing of this application? N/A
Local address:
'Telephone no.
State character or type of business of applicant heretofore: Restaurant Business
State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on band at this time:
There are no alcoholic beverages goodsware or merchandise on hand.
How long has applicant been in this business? in restaurant business since 1967
Is the applicant an elected public official? N/A If so, state the particulars thereof:
Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public
official?_._ no
In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any
political contributions within the past 2 years? N/A
If so, state the particulars thereof. --
Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? AA If so, designate title:
-ftrpkem logsoss -s- -Ped�
No If so, state the reasons therefor:
Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of
subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of
the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? No If so, list
date(s) of said conviction(s):
Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premises
other than S Pe,fribA, this t,,44g�,;jtiop? Yes If so �Ale, dMosi
application: ,zz er ran nc.of—rat s, ove? Wn of such
rh 1L�L_D,L tjh J r- h ,
tJ:JP_ IT " izz er Mtaurants throughout
P_ ce licenses
Currently we are applying -or licenses for 12 Illinois Sizzler Restaurants.
Is applicant qualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor
business? Yes, Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal
government or by any state or subdivision thereof`7 No - If so, explain: --
Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed
by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? No
Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United
States of America or any of the Ordinances of the Village of Mount Prospect in the
conduct of his/her place of business? Yes
Does applicant currently _-try Dram Shop Insurance coverages. Yes If 'Yes,* attach
copy.
If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop
ft"MM -Yes ions is 140'
no license =shissue -�-if -the Vnswer " eidm '"f Abe fat"oin que6t
*Applicant provides Dram Shop Insurance coverage on behalf of the owner of the premises.
Does Surety Bond required by Ordinance accompany this application at the time of
filing? yes
State name and address of each surety next below:
National Surety Corporation 777 San Marin Drive, Novato, CA 94998
Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of
manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application is made:
Timothy F. Prohaska 405 Austin #10, Downers Grove 60515 241-0879
SSN: 356-50-3929 DOB: 10-25-55
Sizzler Restaurants Intl. Inc.
77
SIGNATURE OF APPLICAN:F� President
Corporate Seal
(If applicant is corporation)
Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that he is/are the
applicant(s) for the license requested in the foregoing application; thathe_is/are of
good repute, character and standing and that answers to the questions asked in the
foregoing application are true and correct in every detail.
CALIFORNIA
STATE OF-H�IS
Los Angeles) SS.
--E— �-�-OF-13-00K
Subscribed and Sworn to before me this 30th day of July AD., 19 go
OFFICIAL SEAL
LORY J. THORLEY
L
Notary Public -California`
Notary
, ANGELES COUNTY
LOS ry
N
!oy Comm Exp Feb 8. 1991
APPLICATION APPROVED;
Local liquor Control Commissioner
a
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
increasing the number of Class "W- liquor licenses by one (1) (Sizzler Restaurants
International, Inc. d/b/a Sizzler Restaurant, 110 East Rand Road), so that hereafter said
Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows:
i
Three (3)
Class A Licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Ten (10)
Class C Licenses
One (1)
Class D license
Two (2)
Class E licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H license
One (1)
Class M License
Two (2)
Class P Licenses
Sixteen (16)
Class R Licenses
Ten (10)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T license
Ten (10)
Class W licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of , 1990.
Village President
Class
Establishment
Num�
A
McBride's; Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
3
B
Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors; The
Liquor Shoppe; Mt. Prospect liquors: Osco
Drugs; Phar-Mor; Walgreens (83 and Golf);
Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course
I
H
Zanie's
I
M
Holiday Inn
1
P
Arlington Club Beverage; Shimada Shoten
2
R
Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Dragon City; Edwardo's;
Fellini; Giordano's (Rand Road); Giordano's
(Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan;
Izakaya Sankyu; little America; Pepe's;
Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise; Torishin;
Yasuke
16
S
Carlisle; El Sombrero; Evans;
Jake's Pizza; Karnpai; Old Orchard-Greenview;
Reunion; Sam's Place; Second Dynasty; Wild
Stallions Cafe
10
T
Thunderbird Lanes
I
W
Mickey's Diner; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's
Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut
(Algonquin Rd); Pizza Hut (Euclid); Rosati's
Pizza; Sizzler Restaurant; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's
10
60
Village cf.1-11cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY
DATE: AUGUST 31, 1990
SUBJECT: APPOINTMENTS TO' SIGN'- REVIEW BOARD AND PLAN
COMMISSION
I hereby nominate Richard F. Rogers to serve on the Sign Review Board for a term to
expire on April 30, 1994. Mr. Rogers has lived in Mount Prospect since September 1968
and resides at 1715 North Laurel. He is President of ACM Associates, Inc., located at
322 North Wolf Road in Mount Prospect. His office number is 824-6160 and home
phone is 827-0929. 1 have attached a copy of Mr. Roger's resume for your review.
PLAN CQM ISSION
I hereby nominate Elizabeth Ann Luxem to serve on the Plan Commission. Ms. Luxem
will replace Bud Richardson and her term will expire on April 30, 1991. Ms. Luxem is
President of All American Hero, located at Randhurst Shopping Center, telephone 392-
2920 and resides at 1205 West Cleven; 870-0971. Attached is a copy of Ms. Luxem's
resume for your review.
GERALD L FARLEY
GLF/rcw
c: Director of Planning and Zoning David Clements
Richard F. Rogers
1715 N. Laurel Drive
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Residence since September 1968
Education: University of Illinois - 4 years Architectural Engineering
Licenses: Registered Architect-- Illinois 1968 1
Registered Architect- Wisconsin, Michigan
Registered Professional` Engineer - Illinois 1969
Member: American Institute of Architects
American Registered Architects
National Council Architectural Registration Boards
Builders Association of Chicago
Lake County Contractors Association
Experience: Einstein Associates, Inc. - Structural Engineers
1961 thru 1969 - Architect
M.A. Lombard Company - General Contractor
1969 thru 1972 - Architect/Builder
W.E. O'Neil Construction Company - General Contractor
1972 thru 1978 - Senior Project Manager
ACM Associates, Inc. - General Contractor/Construction Manager
1978 to Present - President and Founder
Clients: ACM Associates, Inc., American Hospital Supply Corp.,
American Telephone & Telegraph Company (AT&T), Baxter
Travenol Laboratories, Illinois Bell Telephone, Illinois
Masonic Medical Center, Kemper Insurance Company,
Norfolk & Western Railroad, Safety Kleen Corp., Shure
Brothers, Inc., United Parcel Services.
Elizabeth Ann Luxem
1205 W. Cleven
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
Date of birth: August 6,1944
Family: Husband - John three children 19-17-15
Resident of Mt. Prospect - 18 years
Church Affiliation: Saint Raymond
Volunteer Experience:
1972 - 1981 St Raymond's Church - Cantor and member of Music
and Liturgy Committees. 6 years Music Coordinator
1976 - 1982 Westbrook -School PTA Board - several different
positions on,the board
1 year PTA Cordinating Council District 57
Twice honored as volunteer of the year - Volunteer
Service Bureau for service to Westbrook School
1982 awarded Honary Lifetime Membership in Illinois
PTA
1985 to Present Randhurst Merchants Association Board of
Directors
June 1988 to present: President
Work Experience:
1984 - Present: All American Hero - Randhurst Shopping Center
President
1981 - 1984 Teacher (Music & Theology)
Sacred Heart of Mary High School
Rolling Meadows, Illinois
1980-1981 Part Time Music Teacher
St. Alphonsus School
Prospect Heights, Illinois
I believe that because we have been given many talents and had the
opportunities in education, in business and in societyto develope
our talents, we have an obligation to give something back the
the community. Mount Prospect has been a wonderful community to live
and to raise my family. It is an honor and a challange to be asked
to serve on a committee.
LEGAL NOTICE
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
Notice is hereby given that the Village Manager of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, will receive bids at the Office of the Village
Manager, 100 South Emerson Street, until 5:00 P.M. on September 4,1990, for
the purchase ofaarcel of land owned by the Village of Mount Prospect located
at 443 West RanTRoad. The Bid Proposals for the purchase of certain land
presently owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, will be opened and publicly
"ad at the regular ineetint of the Village Board, beginning at 7:30 P.M. on
September 4, 1990. Any stre proposal shall be in the forin of a standard real
estate contract form accompanied by earnest money in cash, certified check,
or cashier's check in the amount of 10% of the offer (bid proposal).
This particular vacant parcel, commonly known as 443 West Rand Road,
,,,
ount respect, Illinois, is zoned R-1 (Single Family residence), as established
in a Restrictive Covenant as Document No. 14707743, along with utility ease.
ments, which property is legally described as follows:
Lot 4 in Block 3, in Prospect Meadows, a Subdivision of the West kti of the
Southwest v4 of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range U East of the Third
Principal Meridian according to plat recorded December 9,1949 as Doeu-
merit 14692921 all in Cook County, Illinois.
Prospective bidders and interested persons may review the location notes at
the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, in the of free of the
Village Clerk, The Village of Mount Prospect reserves the right to reject any
and all bids.
By Order of the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
SALE OF LAND
NOTICE TO BIDDERS ;9196
Notice is hereby given that the Village Manager of the Vi 7-C ITy"fil-
flage at
Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, will receive bids at the
office of the Village Manager, 100 South Emerson Street, until
5:00 P.M. on September 4, 1990, for the purchase of a parcel
of land owned by the Village of Mount Prospect located at 443
West Rand Road, The Bid Proposals for the purchase of certain
land presently owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, will be
opened and publicly read at the regular meeting of the Village
Board, beginning at 7.,30 P.M. on September 4, 1990. Any such
proposal shall be in the, form of a standard real estate contract
form accompanied by eamest money in cash, certified check, or
cashier's check in the amount of 10% of the offer (bid pro-
Posall).
This particular vacant parcat commonly known as 443 West
Rand Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois, is zoned R-1 (Single Fam-
ily residence), as established in a Restrictive Covenant as
Document No, 14707743, along with utility easements, Which
property is legally described as follows:
Lot 4 in Block 3, in Prospect Meadows, a Subdivision of the
West 1/2 of the Southwest 114 of Section 27, Township 42
North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian according
to plat recorded December 9, 1949 as Document 14692921 all
in Cook County, Illinois,
Prospective bidders and interested persons may review the lo-
cation notes at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street,
Mount Prospect, in the office of the Village Clark. The Village of
Mount Prospect reserves the nght to reject any and all bids.
By Order of the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect.
Gerald LCarfig, Mayor
Legal
Notices
Notice to Bidders
Saw of Land
Notice tis hereby qneh that the
VIRI: Manage, of the VIliago of
M. , Phasibect cook County,
fffinois' will 10000" bids at the
office of the Wiager Manager,
10D South Emerson Sloan, aniJi
6,00 P M 0. sopblrbbei 4, 10%,
for the Purchase at aplrhcini of
" Owned by the Villave of
MOUM Prospect i0oatled at 443
W051 Rood Road, rho Bid Pro -
Probe; for the purchase of cef-
Ulo) land Presan4W seated by the
WMount Prraspect, will be
opened and pubhc� lead at the
m
nogufar coling o the Village
1=dethini at 7:30 P.M. on
4,
990 Any such
Proposal .shallbe in i1be term of a
standard feet estate contract
ionyl accompanied by earnest
in cash, fulififled check,
or cashier's check in the amount
at 10% of the off" (bid Phopos•
r Thin partbautar o1,
*.am DaloW.
"nay
Pubjehed ni M11 Prospect Her-
d, Aug 14, 21, 28, 1990 C
V111096 of Vvunt Prospect
Mount t -.aspect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: MASTER COLLECTION BOX/PARKING METER FEES
DATE: AUGUST 30, 1990
The. attached ordinance, amends specified sections of Chapter is
(Traffic Code) in order to provide for parking on public roadways
with a collection box, as well as creating the increased parking fee
of $2.00 for a specified zone.
While this Ordinance establishes a parking fee of $2.00, the
Ordinance creating the zone reclairing a $2.00 parking fee, which
are designated areas of Prospect Avenue, was passed and approved
by the Village Board at the August 21st meeting.
,o7
'1e4'44'X �+
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
caf/
CAF/
8/29/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF M
_ UNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.1322.0 entitled "Metered Parking
Zones" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) --of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto
regulations governing master collection box system for parking on
public streets; so that hereinafter said Section 18.1322.0 of
Chapter 18 shall be and read as follows:
C. Master Collection Box System.
1. Parking Within Municipal Parking Lots
a. There shall be established at each parking lot
described in Schedule XV.A of the Appendix to
this Chapter one or more master collection
boxes which shall have numbered slots. The
slot numbers shall correspond to numbers
(hereinafter referred to as "posted numbers")
assigned to and posted at the head of each
parking space in the parking lot.
b. The deposit of sufficient United States coins
or currency amounting to One Dollar ($1.00) in
a numbered slot in a master collection box
shall establish a parking time of one day for
the corresponding numbered parking space.
2. Parking on Specified Public Roadways
a. There shall be established on each roadway
described in Schedule XV.A of the Appendix to
.this Chapter one or more master collection
boxes which shall have numbered slots. The
slot numbers shall correspond to numbers
(hereinafter referred to as "posted numbers")
assigned to and posted in the parkway adjacent
to the designated parking space.
b. The deposit of sufficient United States coins
or currency amounting to Two Dollars ($2.00)
in a numbered slot in a master collection box
shall establish a parking time of one day for
the corresponding numbered parking space.
SECTION TWO: That Section 18.1322.H entitled "Metered Parking
Zones" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended to include
regulations governing parking zones with Two Dollar ($2.00) fees;
so that hereinafter sub -paragraphs 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Section
18.1322.H shall be and read as follows:
11 H. Deposit of Coins and Time Limits.
No person shall park a vehicle in any parking space
which, at the head of, along side of or next to which a
parking meter has been installed, during the restricted
Chapter 18 - Metered Zones
Page 2 of 2
and regulated time applicable to the metered parking zone
in which such meter is located unless a coin or coins of
United States currency of the appropriate denomination
as provided in this Chapter shall have been deposited
therein, or shall have been previously deposited therein
for an unexpired interval of time, and said meter has
been placed in operation.
2. No person shall park a vehicle in any parking space
which, at the head of alongside of or next to a parking
meter has been installed, during the restricted and
regulated time applicable to the metered parking zone in
which such parking space is located while the parking
meter for such space indicates by signal that the lawful
parking time in such space has expired. This provision
shall not apply to the act of parking or the time which
is required to deposit immediately thereafter a coin or
coins in such meter.
3. No person shall park a vehicle in any parking space
which, at the head of alongside of or next to is located
a posted number, during the restricted and regulated time
applicable to the metered parking zone in which such
parking space is located unless One Dollar ($1.00) has
been deposited in the corresponding numbered slot on the
master collection box. This provision shall not apply
to the act of parking or the time which is required to
deposit immediately thereafter one Dollar ($1.00) in such
numbered slot.
4. No person shall park a vehicle in any parking space at
the head of, alongside of or next to which is located a
posted number during the restricted and regulated time
applicable to the metered parking zone in which such
parking space is located unless Two Dollars ($2.00) has
been deposited in the corresponding numbered slot on the
master collection box. This provision shall not apply
to the act of parking or the time which is required to
deposit immediately thereafter Two Dollar ($2.00) in such
numbered slot. 11
SECTION TWO; This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF. PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-68-V-90, ROBERT REPPLINGER
LOCATION: 400 WEST KENSINGTON
DATE: AUGUST 27, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Robert Repplinger. The applicant is requesting a variation from
Section 14.102.B.1 to permit a four (4) foot separation between an existing deck and garage
instead of the ten (10) foot required separation.
The deck at 400 West Kensington, as constructed, extends 12 feet from the house, leaving
only 2-1/2 feet of separation to the garage. The applicant is proposing to reduce the size
of the deck to create a 4 foot separation.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of August 23, 1990. At the
meeting, Mr. Repplinger presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that
he would cut the deck size down and install a fireproof drywall lining on the interior of the
garage as requested by Inspection Services.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that no objectors were present
to voice concerns.
Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a 4 foot
separation between an existing deck and garage at 400 West Kensington, conditioned on
installation of fire -rated drywall on the garage interior.
DMC:hg
Rj s.a4 Nf
am
N,4.tc.tlj3c9S
,ftl,� rd
,kc- fi
7LrG (,tai C
a-
'evF— I
t � j jjI j
Jam.
�
Sl
r
Rj s.a4 Nf
am
N,4.tc.tlj3c9S
,ftl,� rd
,kc- fi
7LrG (,tai C
t � j jjI j
Jam.
Sl
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 68-V-90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT
Hearing Date: August 23, 199
Robert Repplinger
400 W. Kensington
August 7, 1990
Variation from Section
14.102.8.1 to permit a 41
separation from an existing
deck and garage.
Gilbert Basnik,.Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.102.B.1
to permit a 41 separation between an existing deck and
garage.
The petitioner, Robert Repplinger of 400 W. Kensington,
presented his case stating that he built a deck 2 1/2' from
his garage but will reduce it to a 4' separation, in order to
increase the distance between structures, and reduce the
variations.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the Inspection Services Department wants fire rated drywall
installed in the garage to increase fire safety with the
reduced separation.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a variation to allow a 4' separation
between an existing garage with the condition fire rated
drywall be installed in the garage.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr—Pratt seconded.
ZBA-68-V-90
August 23, 1990
Page 2 of 2
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron,,Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Village Board action is required for this case.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
*ALAGE OF MOUNT PROSPho-T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN M,
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT- ZBA-68-V.90, ROBERT REPPLINGER
LOCATION: 400 WEST KENSINGTON
DATE: AUGUST 13, 1990
REQ=
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 14.102.11.1 to permit a 4 foot separation
between an existing deck and garage. The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires a
10 foot separation.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Inspection Services recommends that if the deck is closer than 10 feet to a garage, a fire
protection lining (5/8" Class X drywall) be installed on the garage interior. If any grade
changes are proposed, the applicant should submit a separate grading plan.
PL ANNIN9 Ate"► ZONING COMMENTS
The applicant is requesting a variance to allow an existing deck to remain between the
house and garage at 400 West Kensington. The detached garage is located approximately
14 1/2 feet directly behind the house. The deck extends 12 feet, leaving a 2 1/2 foot
separation to the garage. The applicant is proposing to reduce the size of the deck to 10
1/2 feet wide to provide a 4 foot separation - thereby minimizing the variance.
The rectangular -shaped deck is located to take advantage of a sliding glass patio door. The
narrow distance between the house and garage is partially the result of the property being
a comer lot. Garage access from Elmhurst Avenue, rather than Kensington Road, resulted
in the garage being located in the rear yard.
Staff does not have any major objections to the proposal to maintain the deck with 4 feet
of separation to the garage, subject to the condition of installing fire -rated drywall in the
garage.
DMC:hg
PILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPk7eT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WC
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT- ZBA-70-SU-90, BRYAN E. COUSSENS
LOCATION: 405 EAST HIGHLAND
DATE: AUGUST 24, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Bryan Coussens. The applicant is requesting a Special Use permit
to allow a three -car garage at 405 East Highland Avenue.
The Zoning Board of Appeals considered the request at their meeting of August 23, 1990.
At the meeting, Mr. Coussens presented testimony in support of the request. He explained
that the additional garage space would be used to store his sailboat. The new garage will
be designed with two parking bays accessible from the existing driveway. Most of the
additional garage space will be to the back, rather than providing a third parking bay.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request, noting that all setbacks will
be met. It was noted that the adjacent property owner also has an over -sized garage.
Accordingly, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended approval of a
Special Use permit for a three -car garage at 405 East Highland Avenue.
DMC:hg
�. `..,,. ..W`:i 405 NIGHLnNb SCALE'.
r r
'
d!'
� t,.,.i*r h16W '►ltrPaaiD
' A f
4 r GRe++ 01 ~..
4 i —
002zf—
U� Otis*Mt � v
v
10
iT Wee—
b ,wY. Pyr 'J�.yAr- .._ L" •,{" �y ` �"
hG Ra "his
5.1
I
""rla-�a..✓.. /"G/kir
FOR
FT ROOK
mmoa re deacnptwn m thu Plat wdh tour derd. sba i or certitkate al gide d.
/
� sN poinu Mon +tartuy aM' eacacN;nq or Mddurg. Ir n ntlursred alu>tt
any discnpancy be bund. ninon carne to a+r atGce x ones. 8ua&m tion ar
eaeemeate ehoun ertiy .ate*a they are w recordsd in the mayr. otlKrwae reLer w!r .,W�„ ..—^-'"' .�� • '' ' �. �
deed, ab"-& or aoniM Mand.
ORDER !Y(7. _. ,...,_., ��'.�.T..._...........,....._____._..,..__.............�.. a
0
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 70 -SU -90
71-V-90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Hearing Date: August 23, 1990
Bryan Coussens
405 East Highland
August 7, 1990
Special Use permit to allow a
three -car garage. Variation
from Section 14.3016.A.3 to
allow a 24' wide driveway.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner
is requesting a Special Use permit to allow a three -car
garage and a variation from Section 14.0316.A.3 to allow a
'24' wide driveway.
The petitioner, Bryan Coussens of 405 East Highland,
presented his case stating he has a two -car garage but would
like to construct a three -car garage to keep his two cars and
a sailboat in. Mr. Coussens also stated that the driveway
variation is to accommodate the three -car garage.
Julie Farnham, Planner with the Village stated that most of
the garage is added on the back of the building and the
access will remain the same, but noted that the property is
near the maximum lot coverage.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a Special Use permit for a three -car
garage, noting that the larger garage is not out of character
with the area and is for the personal use of the petitioner.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mrs. Brothers seconded.
ZBA-SU-70-90
ZBA-71-V-90
August 23, 1990
Page 2 of 2
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Brettragert Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This case must be heard before the Village Board.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request from Section 14.3016.A.3 to allow a 24'
wide driveway.
Mrs. Skowron moved. Mrs. Brothers seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Mr. Brettrager then moved to prepare Resolution No. Z-71-90
to record the Zoning Board of Appeals approval of the
petitioners request for a 24' wide driveway. Mrs. Brothers
seconded the motion.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannont Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by'a vote of 7-0*.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
,__LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL—r
MANMNG AM ZOMNG DEPARTAW.Yr
Mount Pwspect' 111160is
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM:
M_
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-704U.90, ZBA-71-V.90, BRYAN E. COUSSENS
LOCATION: 40S EAST HIGHLAND
DATE. AUGUST 10, 119"
REQ1=
The applicant is requesting a Special Use permit to allow a three -car garage at 405 East
Highland. In addition, he is requesting a variance to Section 143016-k3 to allow a 24 foot
wide driveway. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance permits driveways with a maximum width
of 21 feet.
Inspection Services requests that no fill be placed in the sideyard or the rear easement and
that existing drainage patterns be maintained. A building permit must be obtained prior to
construction.
The applicant is proposing to build a three -car detached garage at 405 East Highland. The
existing driveway is 24 feet wide. The applicant would like to maintain this 24 foot width
to access the proposed new garage. The applicant intends to use the three -car garage to
store the family's two cars and a sailboat.
The lot(8,777 sq. ft.) is larger than standard and can accommodate larger structures without
appearing over -built. It should be noted that with the proposed garage, the lot coverage will
increase to 43.9%. This is quite close to the maximum 45% lot coverage allowed by Code.
Only minimal further development should be allowed on this lot. Staff further notes that
the adjacent neighbor to the west has a similar over -sized garage. Staff also notes that the
garage will meet all setback requirements.
Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the request.
DMC:hg
`VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER MT__
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-72-V-90, WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CORP. (WALMART)
LOCATION: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA - RAND AND CENTRAL ROADS
DATE: AUGUST 27, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
a variance application filed by Western Development Corporation for a WalMart Store on
Rand Road adjacent to Phase I of Mount Prospect Plaza. The applicant is requesting the
following parking lot variations from Section 14.2002.E:
1. To allow a 10.5 foot setback adjacent to a residential district in lieu of 20 feet.
2. To allow a 5 foot setback on an interior lot line in lieu of 10 feet.
3. To allow a 10 foot setback from the public right-of-way in lieu of 30 feet.
In addition a variance is requested from Section 14.2003 to allow a 79.7% lot coverage in
lieu of the 75% coverage permitted.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of August 23, 1990. At the
meeting, project Landscape Architect Louis Ennesser of Missman, Stanley and Associates,
explained the need for the variances, primarily resulting from the triangular shape of the lot.
Mr. Ennesser stated that the 114,000 square foot building and parking had to be located so
that conforming setbacks could not be provided, but that all setback areas are attractively
landscaped. Pat Peery, of WalMart Corporation further explained that the size of the
proposed building and corresponding parking reflect the market area and anticipated
customer demand. He stated that once the customer base was established, the store would
generate $25 million in annual sales.
The Village Board generally discussed the request and related issues raised by Village staff.
It was noted that the proposed setbacks are similar to Phase I of Mount Prospect Plaza.
Also, the site includes stormwater detention, so the higher lot coverage should not cause a
run-off problem on adjoining properties.
John Fulton Dixon
Page 2
August 27, 1990
Based on these observations, by a 7-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
approval of the following variations for Phase II of Mount Prospect Plaza Shopping Center:
1. To allow a 10.5 foot parking lot setback adjacent to a residential district.
2. To allow a 5 foot parking lot setback along an interior lot line.
3. To allow a 10 foot parking lot setback from a right-of-way.
4. To allow 79.7% lot coverage.
This recommendation is conditioned on the removal of an existing shopping center
identification sign on Rand Road.
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT.PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 72-V-90 Hearing Date: August 23, 1990
PETITIONER: Western Development/Walmart
SUBJECT PROPERTY:, Mount Prospect Plaza
Rand and Central Roads
PUBLICATION DATE: August 7, 1990
REQUEST: Variances from Section
14.2002.E to allow 10.5'
parking lot setback adjacent
to residential district.
This is the proposed setback
along the east lot line,
adjoining the apartment
building. Section 14.2002.E
to allow a 5' parking lot
setback from an interior lot
line. Section 14.2002.E to
allow a 10' parking lot
setback from the public
right-of-way. Section
14.2003 to allow 79.7% lot
coverage.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Linda Elliot, 108 MacArthur
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioners are requesting a variation from Section 14.2002.E
to allow a 10.5' parking lot setback adjacent to a
residential district. This is the proposed setback along the
east lot line adjoining the apartment building. From Section
14.2002.E to allow a 5' parking lot setback from an interior
lot line. This is the proposed setback along the north lot
line. From Section 14.2002.E to allow a 10' parking lot
setback from the public right-of-way. This is the proposed
setback for Rand Rd. Also, from Section 14.2003 to allow
79.7% lot coverage. Seventy-five percent is allowed by Code.
ZBA-72-V-90
August 23, 1990
Page 2 of 3
The petitioner, David Reifman, attorney representing Western
Development, presented his case by introducing the Engineer
for the project, Louis Enesser. Mr. Enesser then proceeded to
explain to the Board the need for the variations is because
of the shape of the property. Mr. Enesser continued by
stating that there are many utilities on the property
including water and sanitary lines. Mr. Enesser also stated
that the drainage on the property is very poor and they would
like to improve that with the development. Mr. Enesser
continued by stating that a detention basin will be located
in the Northeast coiner of the property for the drainage and
the need for the variance of the lot coverage is because of
the shape of the property. He continued by stating that they
noticed a fair amount of pedestrian circulation and would
like to keep that part of the shopping center free of traffic
because of the pedestrians. With that, the trucks would exit
at the traffic signal located near St. Paul Federal at the
front entrance of the shopping center to control the
situation. Mr. Enesser also stated that the proposed building
would be well screened from the upper floors of the apartment
building located in the rear of the property with trees and
landscaping. Chairman Basnik questioned the requirement for
Walmart parking. Pat Perry, Real Estate Manager with Walmart
stated that the requirement is 6 cars per 1000 square feet of
building. Mr. Lannon questioned the size of the store. Mr.
Perry stated that the size of the store will be 114,000
sq. feet based on the location and population of the area.
Mr. Perry also stated this is the largest size store
proposed for the site.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
Walmart is cooperating with the Village staff and the
variations requests are minor, providing similiar setbacks to
those at Phase I of Mount Prospect Plaza. Mr. Clements also
stated a letter from the apartment complex concerning the
view and Walmart has stated larger trees will be put in and
the landscaping plans are well over the requirement. Mr.
Clements recommends approval.
Linda Elliot, 108 MacArthur, questioned why the trucks
couldn't go behind the shopping center. Mr. Perry stated that
there are only three deliveries and with the'pedestrian flow
behind the building they would like the trucks to exit at a
controlled intersection. Mr.Perry also stated that it would
be difficult to make a left turn on Rand Rd. at an
uncontrolled intersection.
ZBA-72-V-90
August 23, 1990
Page 3 of 3
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, and it was
noted that Walmart would be good addition to the community,
and that the variations would not effect the quality of the
site plan.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for the variations.
Mr. Brettrager moved. Mr. Lannon seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Cassidy, Brothers,
Brettrager, Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
`-w-tLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPLx'T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ;yyV
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-72-V-90, WESTERN DEVELOPMENT CORP. (WALMART)
LOCATION: MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA - RAND AND CENTRAL ROADS
DATE: AUGUST 14, 1990
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting several variances to accommodate the proposed development
of a WalMart Store in Mount Prospect Plaza Shopping Center. The variances requested
include:
1. To allow a 10.5 foot parking lot setback adjacent to a residential district. Twenty feet
is required per Section 14.2002.E. This is the proposed setback along the east lot
line, adjoining the apartment building.
2. To allow a 5 foot parking lot setback from an interior lot line. Ten feet is required
per Section 14.2002.E. This is the proposed setback along the north lot line.
3. To allow a 10 foot parking lot setback from the public right-of-way. Thirty feet is
required per Section 14.2002.E. This is the proposed setback for Rand Road.
4. To allow 79.7% lot coverage. Seventy-five percent is allowed by Code per Section
14.2003.
The property is zoned a B-3 District. The WalMart Store is a permitted use in this zoning
district.
Village staff have expressed several comments and concerns relative to the proposed
development. These include:
1. Surface drainage is critical. Proposed plan must conform to previous detailed
drainage plan submitted by Western Development.
2. Utilities must be relocated (sanitary sewer, storm sewer, and water). M.W.R.D.
permit required for sanitary sewer.
Zoning Board of Appeals
Page 2
ZBA-72-V-90
3. I.D.O.T. permit required for entrance on Rand Road.
4. Full engineering site plans required.
5. Development fees and guarantees required, including fees for 28 parkway trees.
6. Site development and building permits needed prior to construction.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 114,513 square foot WalMart Store on the 10.6
acre site in the Phase 11 area of Mount Prospect Plaza. Several parking setback variances
are needed to accommodate the proposed site layout. The applicant states that the pie -
shape of the lot contributes to the need for the variances. In addition, WalMart has a
specific building configuration that must be accommodated. The large size of the store
results in a parking requirement of 516 spaces, The proposed plan includes 549 spaces.
Because of the amount of hard surface, a relatively large (28,000 s.f.) detention area is
required on-site. In short, this is a rather dense development on a difficult (due to shape)
site.
Planning staff has several concerns with the proposed site plan. These include:
1. Access
The northernmost entrance to the site, off Rand Road, creates a goose -neck access
to the main parking lot. The applicant has explained that this is not intended to
function as the main entrance. It is primarily an access for delivery vehicles. The
intent was to clearly separate delivery traffic from customer traffic. In addition,
design considerations such as creating right-angle (perpendicular) intersections, were
criteria in the circulation layout. Some consideration has been given to making this
a right -in, right -out only access. Staff believes that this access point will be used
heavily by customers, and that the "goose -neck" is an awkward turning movement.
The petitioner believes that primary access will be at the signalized entrance by the
savings and loan.
2. Land$Savi
a. About half of the front (west) perimeter of the parking lot is across the street
from a residential district. In this area, 100% screening is required. Staff suggests
removing 10 parking spaces (two groups of five) along the west perimeter to create
two "bump -out" landscape areas. These will increase the parking lot setback and
allow denser landscaping in these areas. This technique helps reduce the variation
in a few selected locations.
Zoning Board of Appeal
Page 3
ZBA-72-V-90
b. The sidewalk directly west of the store entrance vestibule is very wide (35). Staff
suggests creating a triangular planter in this area to soften the building and enhance
the entrance area.
3. Rei subdiv.1sion
The applicant has explained that WalMart intends to eventually purchase this
property. This will require resubdivision to create a separate lot of record.
4. Develgpment Code LUM
On the proposed site plan, the detention basin is located about 60 feet from the
building. The Development Code requires a 75 foot separation.
In addition to these specific concerns, staff has requested that the applicant submit
additional drawings including:
. design details for all proposed fencing
- building elevations indicating materials
. signage package indicating location and size of all proposed signage
Staff has met with the applicant's design consultant to discuss these concerns. Revised
drawings and the requested additional drawings will be submitted for review at the August
23, 1990 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Also, discussion will be continuing on access
and on-site circulation.
Summaxy
Staff would note that overall, the variation requests are minor, and provide setbacks that are
similar to Phase I in Mount Prospect Plaza. The irregular shape of the lot contributes to
some of the difficulty in developing the site, and meeting the parking needs of WalMart.
One important observation is that the large single -user WalMart Store would be more
beneficial to the Village instead of small retailers as originally envisioned with Phase H.
Staff recommends approval of the request, subject to increasing the landscaping as noted,
and removal of the existing shopping center identification sign.
DMC:hg
V—LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL,.-f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 31, 1990
SUBJECT: WALMART, MOUNT PROSPECT PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER
The variation request by WalMart includes an increase of the permitted lot coverage from
75% to 79.7%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of this variation.
After the public notice was published for a 79.7% lot coverage, the project engineer
recalculated the lot coverage, based on additional survey information. This calculation
revealed a lot coverage of 84%. The engineer stated that he would work to reduce the lot
coverage to the published amount of 79.7%. Further work on the site plan found a 82% lot
coverage.
The engineer notes that on a 10 1/2 acre site with an irregular shape, there is a 1% or 2%
margin of area in calculating such a dimension. Such a calculation is done with an
instrument called a planimeter. The Planning and Zoning staff and Engineering
Department confirm that a reasonable margin of error must be considered in working with
a planimeter.
It should also be noted that our public notice requirements state that a notice should
provide "a brief statement of the nature of the requested variation." Considering this
statement, it could be that the Village did not need to publish the specific coverage of
79.7%, but could have provided an approximate lot coverage. This has been confirmed
with the Village Attorney. However, Arthur Holtzman of Pedersen and Houpt states that
WalMart should agree to bold the Village harmless if there is ever litigation over the lot
coverage variation.
Considering that there were no objectors to the request, and that on-site detention controls
stormwater run-off, the 82% lot coverage figure should have no adverse impact on adjoining
properties.
DMS:hg
Missman, Stanley& Associates, Prof. Corp.
CONSULTING ENGINEERS • SURVEYORS
424 - East State Street, Box 4327, Rockford, Illinois 61 1 1 0-0827
Phone 815/965-6400 Fax 815/965-6416
Robert E. Dunning August 28, 1990
Office Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Attention: David M. Clements, AICP
Director of Planning & Zoning
Re: Mount Prospect Plaza, Phase II (Wal-Mart)
Dear Dave:
We have completed additional lot coverage calculations for
the subject project. Due to modifications of the lot lines and
the introduction of additional survey information, we have
recalculated the lot coverage at +84%. We propose to mitigate
this problem by curbing and landscaping all paved areas currently
shown on our plans as pavement striping unless there is the
potential for interference with current parking ratios or
pedestrian/vehicular circulation. There are also site areas
currently shown as paved not critical to circulation which we
will now show as landscaped areas. These modifications to the
plans would reduce the lot coverage to +820 (based on our
experience, there is a 1%-2% margin of error in measurement of
irregular shaped areas).
We are also creating new landscaped areas or enhancing
existing landscaped areas off site (at the overflow parking
areas). This will provide 5,520 square feet of landscaped areas.
Although we originally requested a variance for 79.7% lot
coverage, we believe +82% lot coverage with maximum "green space"
will be more beneficial to the Village than for Wal-Mart to re-
apply for a lot coverage variance of +840.
Please contact this office if you have any questions or
comments.
Very truly yours,
MISSMAN, STANLEY ,& ASSOCIATES
ZOASis J. Ennesser, Jr., ASLA
Director of Landscape Architecture
LJE: cm
PRINCIPALS R. C. Ryken - President K. L. Koski - Vice -President C. L. Palmer - Vice -President
ASSOCIATES J M Roegiers C. C. Bievins D. R Martin R E Dunning M. K. McCaw D T Schwerfley J. D Rose 6 D Frickenstein
VIL" AGE OF MOUNT PROOPECT
i„, ,,,NNING AND ZONING DEPARTfi,,_ 21 T
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: August 20, 1990
SUBJECT: Clarewood Subdivision.
412-414 Rand Road
The applicant is requesting that his property on Hill Street be subdivided into two single-
family lots. The remaining property at the comer of Hill and Rand will be subdivided at
a later date. The site is zoned R-1. In addition to this subdivision request, the applicant
is also seeking a change in Comprehensive Plan for the two proposed lots from General
Commercial/Office to Single -Family Residential.
The proposed two lot subdivision is bordered to the north by a funeral home, to the east
by single-family homes, to the south by a vacant lot and to the west by Rand Road. Both
lots have adequate width and lot depth and the owner will comply to all development code
requirements.
A change in the Village's Comprehensive Plan will be required for this two lot subdivision
to be developed. In reviewing the Comprehensive Plan, staff would note that on page 4,
under Principals and Standards, the Plan states that new commercial development should
compliment and relate to major commercial uses already located in the surrounding area.
We would note that there are no such major uses adjacent to or near this two lot
subdivision. On page 16 of the Plan, under General Business Areas, the plan states that
"Land Use regulations tend to reinforce and strengthen the commercial and office functions
of the (Rand) corridor, while maintaining sound clusters of residential development and
public use in certain locations". The proposed subdivision does provide two additional
single-family lots to help support the residential development to the east, while providing
property to the west for potential commercial and office use. Finally, on page 53 of the
Plan, it is recommended that this site be assembled to allow for planned and coordinated
development using special screening and buffering to separate future commercial activities
from the neighborhood to the east. The owner has stated that part of his reason for
creating this two lot single-family detached residential development is to provide some
buffering for the East Highland/Eastman Court neighborhood.
The Plan Commission heard both the Clarewood Subdivision and the above noted change
in the Comprehensive Plan during their regular meeting on Wednesday, August 15, 1990.
Chairman Weibel opened the public hearing for the change in the Comprehensive Plan at
8:10 P.M. There were no objectors present. The Plan Commission then voted 5-0 in favor
of recommending that the Comprehensive Plan be changed for this two lot single-family
residential development from General Commercial/Office to Single -Family Residential. It
then voted 5-0 in favor of recommending that the Clarewood Subdivision Plat be approved.
Staff had no objections to the change in the Comprehensive Plan or the subdivision.
MES:cl
attachment
D I V IS 10 91`4,
c n ASS WOO 0 S U 5"
BEING A SUBOIVISION OF
"a NOT 110.00 rMT or "ff U000"m p" A WRE. 7wowm SO "wr (T no "em sif) nw-(v
'as SWLMMT %mon or Va "UPELLAW farjm ar #*--t*m ". dukxvt 'f M:UflFEM IN VMMI t' 47 *""I, WMT. 11 FAS7
(F 7w n117771PRUMM $=Nam. Inm awmiLy 13r :SCI SSC IT .4011W VA"
vw PAW (T 71% -ffm 'Au :w im
$W=MOr f QUAYSM VMMMW WAM Ur SWTMM M, SSP 42 9Z I I " Cir IM 7"T"D VkINIVAL PM)YAN.
Ulm; wvn"wr Or MM ROD (ROMPT so mallosso rm me agwr m mw 4" T= wwmw) MA to (TTM nvwn, lljiwl
it Vi
'S'UB'N.
LOT /0 Awl
}r' "
f" of durance n"
t I 11 i Zwl
North tine Southffof Norf4 .560 SE is NE f14 50C I(n/
-------------
, V
9.1
LOT 2 LOT I
�v 7
51 IV,-
L—' -, HILL- -'STREET-1
Hdl Strut Dmzfie�erd f— Rlp. A"'Pos. -7/y
r' hr Qocurnant No. 1533384?
Low~
V7
11
9u
�LLAGE OF MOUNT PROVE&
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W�
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 29, 1990
SUBJECT: SINGLE FAMILY REHAB LOANS
At the August 28 Committee -of -the -Whole meeting, the Board concurred with a staff
recommendation to increase the maximum loan amount in our single family rehab program
from $15,000 to $25,000.
To implement this new policy, a Resolution increasing the maximum loan amount to $25,000
is attached. This should be scheduled for Village Board action on September 4.
DMC:hg
Attachment
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION INCREASING THE MAXIMUM LOAN AMOUNT FOR
THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDED
SINGLE FAMILY HOUSING REHABILITATION LOAN PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has operated a Single Family Housing
Rehabilitation Loan Program for the past nine years offering lower income homeowners a
zero percent interest loan for correcting housing Code violations and weatherizing their
property, and
WHEREAS, the maximum loan amount for this program has been fifteen thousand
dollars ($15,000.00) for the past nine years, and
WHEREAS, the cost of rehabilitating these homes have increased due to inflation
and the aging of the housing stock.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect hereby approve increasing the maximum loan amount for its Single Family Housing
Rehabilitation Loan Program, funded with Community Development Block Grant funds, to
twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000.00).
SECTION TWO: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
A
NAYS:
PASSED this day of 1990.
APPROVED this day of , 1990.
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
MAYOR
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois 2&.
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: MULTI -FAMILY RECYCLING PROGRAM
DATE: AUGUST 30, 1990
At the last Committee of the Whole meeting, the Village Board
expressed their support toexparid the recycling program to include
multi -family residents.
Inasmuch as we have a contract with Browning Ferris, it would be
appropriate for the Village Board to consider a motion authorizing
an increase in the contract amount with Browning Ferris, as it
pertains to the recycling program, to include townhomes,
condominiums and multi -family dwelling units at a monthly cost of
$1.11 per dwelling unit.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
caf/
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois :V1
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: FALSE ALARM PENALTIES, FIRE DEPARTMENT
DATE: AUGUST 31, 1990
This Ordinance was drafted at the request of the Fire Chief in
order to establish a penalty schedule for multiple off false alarms
requiring the response of Fire Department personnel and equipment.
The Village Code provides a penalty for false alarms involving the
Police Department, however, the penalty is minimal ($25, $30, etc;)
and would not act as a deterrent against false alarms requiring the
Fire Department to respond, especially considering the equipment
and manpower necessary involved.
As an example, one offender had 80 false alarms in the calendar
year 1989 and since no false alarm section with a penalty attached
had been established, no charges could be assessed.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
caf/
BH/CAF
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE XIV OF CHAPTER 21
(BUILDING CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CQPE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, false alarms requiring the response of emergency Fire
Department personnel and equipment are an ever present concern to
the entire community; and
WHEREAS, emergency equipment responding to a false alarm can cause
equipment to be taken out of service when there may a legitimate
need for an actual emergency elsewhere, placing the lives and
property of both the residents and Fire Department at risk; and
WHEREAS, it is the desire of the Village of Mount Prospect to
discourage false alarms by establishing a penalty for repeat
offenders.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Article XIV entitled "Fire Prevention" of
Chapter 21 (Building Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by inserting a new Section
21.1404 and a new Section 21.1405 and renumbering the existing text
accordingly; so that hereinafter the newly inserted Section 21.1404
and 21.1405 shall be and read as follows:
Sec. 21.1404. Deactivation of Fire Suppression/Fire Alarm
Systems.
It shall be unlawful for any property owner or occupant of the
property to disconnect, deactivate, and/or remove any
automatic sprinkler or other fire suppression system or remove
any fire alarm system from service without first having given
written notification and received written approval of the Fire
Chief or his designated representative. In the event it is
determined by a duly designated representative of the Fire
Chief, in face to face situation, that the system deactivation
or removal from service is necessary, a written confirmation
shall be submitted by the property owner or occupant to the
Fire Chief within 24 hours of such deactivation or removal
from service.
Any person, firm, or corporation found to wilfully cause the
deactivation of a fire suppression or fire alarm system
without the approval of the Fire Chief or his designated
representative shall be fine Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00)
for each offense and each day that such violation continues
shall be considered a separate offense.
Sec. 21.1405. Penalty for Response to False Alarms.
A. False alarms shall be defined as set forth in Section
23.1701 of this Village Code.
B. If the Mount Prospect Fire Department responds to more
than five (5) false alarms or system malfunctions within
a calendar year to the same premises, the property owner
or occupant shall pay the Village the following amounts
within thirty (30) days after the response for which the
charge is made:
6th
false
response:
$100.00
7th
false
response:
$200.00
8th
false
response:
$300.00
9th
false
response:
$400.00
10th
or subsequent
false
response:
$500.00 per response
C
Chapter 21
Fire Prevention
Page 2 of 3
C. Within five (5) working days after the Mount Prospect
Fire Department responds to a false alarm, the Fire
Department shall cause written notification to be given
to the property owner, occupant that a false alarm has
been charged to the property. In the event that this
incident is in excess of the permitted five (5) false
alarms within a calendar year, the property owner shall
be billed the appropriate amount, as set forth in
paragraph B of this Section.
D. Within fifteen (15) days after the alarm, the property
owner or occupant may file with the Fire Chief a written
request to reconsider whether such alarm was avoidable.
Such request shall include all facts upon which the
property owner or occupant bases his opinion.
E. Within ten (10) days after receipt of a written request
for reconsideration, the Fire Chief or his designated
representative shall determine whether or not the alarm
shall be classified as a false alarm and then notify in
writing the property owner or occupant of his decision.
If it is the determination of the Fire Chief that the
alarm shall be classified as a false alarm, the Fire
Chief shall notify the property owner, in writing, of his
decision and the appropriate charge, as set forth in
paragraph B of this Section, shall be paid in full within
thirty (30) days following such notification.
SECTION TWO: That Section 21.1410 entitled "Definitions" of
Chapter 21 of the Village Code, as amended, be and the same is
hereby further amended in its entirety and substituting therefor
the following; so that hereinafter said Section 21.1410 shall be
and read as follows:
See. 21.1410.
Definitions. For the purpose of this Article,
the following words and terms shall have the
following meaning:
ALARM SYSTEM:
Any device installed for the purpose of
alerting others to a fire emergency.
AUTOMATIC
A telephone device or telephone attachment
TELEPHONE
which automatically relays a prerecorded
ALARM:
message to report a fire emergency by
means of a telephone line which terminates
upon a central switchboard.
FALSE ALARM:
An alarm system activated by any one or
more of the following causes:
A. Mechanical failure;
B. Malfunction of the alarm system;
C. Improper installation or maintenance
of the alarm system;
D. Wilful or negligent act of a person;
Chapter 21
Fire Prevention
Page 3 of 3
E. Any other cause not related to a fire
emergency; provided, however, that
any alarm activated by natural causes
including, but not limited to,
tornadoes and sever windstorms, or
by malicious acts of persons not
under the direction or control of the
property owner or occupant shall not
be considered a false alarm. 11
MUNICIPALITY: "Whenever the work "municipality" is
used in this Article, it shall be
construed to refer to the Village of
Mount Prospect.
SECTION THREE: That Section 21.1411 entitled "Penalties" of
Chapter 21 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended in its entirety and substituting therefor
the following; so that hereinafter said Section 21.1411 shall be
and read as follows:
See. 21.1411. Penalties. Unless specified elsewhere in this
Article, the penalty for violating the
provisions of this Article shall be not less than twenty-five
dollars ($25.00) nor more than five hundred dollars ($500.00)
for each offense, as set forth in Section F-105-1 of the BOCA
Basic Fire Prevention Code/1984. Of
SECTION FOUR: That Article XIV entitled "Fire Prevention" of
Chapter 21 (Building Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
reassigning the responsibility of this Article from the Bureau of
Code Enforcement to the Fire Prevention Bureau; so that hereinafter
anywhere the reference to "Bureau of Code Enforcement" or "Director
of Code Enforcement" is hereby replaced by "Fire Prevention Bureau"
or "Director of Fire Prevention", whichever is applicable.
SECTION FIVE; That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the
manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
—A
8 a9qdPq0
UT 'JT PUP P9PTA0ad UOT49ULXOJUT 9q4 AJT29A TTvqs aaanspaal
9.6eiTTA 9q4 'uT9a9q P9PTA*Oad se 'Xvl 199suval 8494sa TROD 90
9-4pqau -log UOT
.4leOTTddv go 4dT9391 9q'4 J6UTm0TT0J SAPP OC UT14-4TM
-4oadsoad qunoW
go abpTTTA aT4-4 u-riq-4Tm paqL,:)oT A-4agdoad SS9UTSnq
snOTAead aqq go 9TPs go 94pp aqq go apaA quo UT
M4Tm
pTea uaaq seg (000'T$) SIPTTOP pupsnolq4 quo aad
(00*80 sJPTT0P 091q4 JO XPI 19JsuPll 94v4sa TP911
Sq4 qOTIqM jog '4oadsoad 4unoW JO 9bPTTTA 9q4 UTq4Tm
A4aadoid PTPs 4P SSOUTsnq P9SU80TT ATnp P sa4vaado
pup A4aadoad TPT4u9PTs9j-u0u s9svqoand uosaad aiql -q
Pup !PTOs sem P94ROOT sem ssauTsnq pTes qoTqm uo
Aqaadoad aq4 pup 4oadsoad 4unoW go 9bPTTTA 9q4 JO
S8Taepunoq 94PaOC1100 9q4 UTq4TM SS9UTsnq P9SU90TT
ATnp P pa4eaado Pule P9Um0 'aA'eq TTPT4s uosiad etll .9
A4jadOld TVT4U9PTS9H-U0N •z
ao !qoadsoad 4unoN go 9bPTTTA 8q4 uTq4Tm
Pa4RDOT aouapTsaa snOTAeid aq-4 bUTTT9s go 949P
9q4 JO aR9A 9UO UTq4Tm '(000'T0 saRTTOP puesnotl4
quo aad (00.Et) saleTTOP 99at[4 go xel aaasuell
9494sa Tv9d Oq4 PTRd seq aq iqoTi4m jog '90u9PTs9a
TpdTOUTad STq SP 4oadsoad qunoK go
9bPTTTA
alq4 uTlq-4Tm mn-rUTMOPU00 .20 asnoigumo-4 laouapTsaa
ATTmP-T-9TbuTs V SOTdn000 pup saspqoand uosjad alql -q
pup :94vqaa
jog uoTqvoTIdde go a4ep eqq go 2R8A 9UO UTq4TM
pTed spm xvl z9gsuRal 94v4sH TP9H 9q4 PUP PTOS Sem
mnTUTMOPUOO 10 asnoqumo4 '90u9PTsaa ATTmPJ-9TbUTS
PTPs PUP 00UaPTS92 ledTOUTid STB se 4oadsoad qunOj4
go abpTTTA 9q4 JO SOTzepunoq a4eaodjoo 9q4 UTq4Tm
4Tun mnTUTMOPUOO ao asnotlumo-4 laouepTsaa ATTmpJ
-9Tbu-Ts P paTdn000 pup P9UMO 8APtl TTeqs uosiad aql •le
Aqa9doad JVT4U9PTS9U 'T
:PTa94Ta0 bUTMOI-COJ ei4-4 s4eam uosaad ai4q -4Rq4 P9PTA0ad ;t9tl:4;rn;
pup aeanspeal 9bvTTTA 9q4 o4 aper ueaq SPq UOT4RDTTddp a9doad
bUTPTAo.xd laoTad aspiqoand aq-4 go (000"ES) sJPTT0P pulesnoqq quo
goes jog (00•Z$) sIRTTOP om4 go aqpqaa P 04 P9T4T4u9 aq TT94S
941ea (000'-[$) jpTT0P pupsnoq4 quo aad (oo-c$) saPTTOP 99aq4
9q4 49 xPl a9JsuRal 94R4sa TeOH eq4 pTvd spq oqm uosaad AuV -q
:SMOTTOJ se peaj pup aq TTeqs 9-ZOS.8 UOT409S
PTEs .18-4jeUT9.19Iq 4PI14 OS ,A-4jadoid Te-14U9PTs9a-U0U .109 ADTTod
a4eqaj P apnIOUT 04 papuame aaq4anj Aqaaaq ST 'P9,PU8MV Se l4oadsoad
4un014 -;0 9PO0 95eTTTA 914-4 3:0 8 a9-4dvlq0 go nxel JO u014Tsodmi,
P9T4T4u9 Z08.8 uoT-409S go, il uoT-4oasqns -4eql ;'M go-TI50
:SIONIqUI 'XINnOD XOOD 'IDadSOHd lKnOW JO aDVqqIA
HHI aO saaisriui jo auvog aNv iNaaisa*aci alll AS aaNIVa'dO II HS
XVI aa3YdI Sa Wad 01 aAllYlaH aQOA M17-10-
8 HaldVHD aO IIIA a'IDI.L'dV VNIGNaWV aDKVNIGHO KV
,ON a0mvNiaHo
06/6Z/B
Jeo/ra
Page 2 of 2
the opinion of the Village Treasurer, the applicable criteria
has been met the Village Treasurer shall cause a warrant toeb
issued to the person applying for said rebate.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois la
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: CAROL A. FIELDS, VILLAGE CLERK
RE: AMENDMENTS TO TRAFFIC CODE
DATE :AUGUST 30, 1990
The attached Ordinance 'amends the Traffic Code to include the
"Yield" sign on westbound Henry Street at Forest Avenue authorized
by the Village Board at their August 21st meeting.
The Ordinance also includes a housekeeping section which
establishes a 20 MPH speed limit on Hatlen Avenue both north and
southbound.
caf/
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
(41
CAF/
8/30/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2004.B entitled "Yield Signs" of
Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper
alphabetical sequence "Henry St. Westbound Forest Ave.", so that
hereinafter said Section 18.2004.B shall include the following:
of Name of
Street
Henry St.
Direction of
Traffic Movement
Westbound
At Intersection With
Forest Ave. 11
SECTION TWO: That Section 18.2001 entitled "Speed Restriction" of
Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting "Hatlen Ave.
Southbound 20 Entire Jurisdiction" and substituting therefor in
proper alphabetical sequence "Hatlen Ave. North & Southbound 20
Entire Jurisdiction"; so that hereinafter said section 18.2001
shall include the following:
to Speed
Name of Direction of Limit
Street Traffic Movement (MPH) pescrintion
Hatlen Ave. North & Southbound 20 Entire Jurisdiction of
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
, 1990.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
14 INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TM GTT" LIM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 29, 1990
SUBJ: Bid Results - Railroad Beautification
On August 28, 1990, sealed bids were opened for additional land-
scaping along the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad
Right -of -
Way. Bid results follow:
OPTIONAL
BIDDERS BID PRICE WATERING
TOTAL COST
Wilson's Landscape
Contractors Inc. $15,957.83* $275.00
$16,232.83
Shannon Construction
Services 16,429.00* 250.00
16,679.00
Tree and Land Inc. 16,913.00 500.00
17,413.00
Berthold Nursery 17,614.00* 425.00
18,039.00
Arthur Weiler Inc. 19,807.00 750.00
20,557.00
The Kenneth Company 20,766.00* 85.00
20,851.00
Charles Klehm and Son 22,130.75 500.00
22,630.75
Hoff Landscape
Contractors 21,919.50* 200.00
22,119.50
St. Aubin Nurseries 23,312.30 380.00
23,692.30
Koch and Son 25,011.00* 400.00
25,411.00
This bid is for installation of trees, shrubs and evergreens to be
planted in two areas along Northwest Highway: A) a
small stretch
near Evanston Ave., and B) from Central Road to Main St., including
the West Commuter Parking lot.
We have checked the references of the low bidder, Wilson Nursery, and
received favorable reports. On page 159 of the 1990-91 budget
$17,500 was allocated for Railroad Improvements (Accounts # 1-071-10-
8717 and 1-071-10-6290). 1 recommend that we award
the contract for
landscape installation plus one watering to Wilson Landscaping Con-
tractors in the amount of $16,232.83.
Herbert L. Weeks
SC/eh
* corrected total
Mount Prospect Public Works 0 partment
ti�-• MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 29, 1990
SUBJ: Bid Results - Shade Tree Planting
On August 28, 1990, sealed bids were opened for the provision
and installation of parkway trees. Bid prices were sought for
2-1/211 trees for our Cost Share planting program, 1-1/211 trees
for reforestation, and larger trees for accident replacements.
Bid tabulations are shown on Attachment A.
We structured the bid to allow us to split the award between
various bidders if that was in the best interests of the Vil-
lage. Attachment B shows that splitting our order for 2-1/211
species between Klehm and Berthold and ordering all 1-1/211 trees
from St. Aubin Nursery gives the lowest total cost. It must be
noted that at this point we can only estimate quantities since
residents may select their choice of species.
There is a total of $114,000.00 in various tree planting ac-
counts in the 1990-91 budget: 1-071-08-6241 (p. 156) 1-071-08-
6242 (p. 156), 1-071-08-6243 (p. 156) and 1-071-10-8718 (p.
158). Based on unit costs and estimated quantities, I recommend
acceptance of bids received by Berthold and Klehm Nurseries for
2-1/211 trees and by St. Aubin Nursery for 1-1/211 trees. Total
expenditures not to exceed $114,000.00
W4
erbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Attachments
Shannon
AtOchnWWA
'✓
Weiler Inc.
Services
Bid Results - Shade Tree Planting
230.00
No bid
August
28, 1990
230.00
280.00
230.00
2 7/2' Trees - Unit Cost Per Tree
230.00
No bid
Hoff
245.00
230.00
No bid
Charles Klehm Landscape
St. Aubin
Berthold
Species
i£ Son Nursery Contractors
Nurseries
Nursery
Black Maple
265.00
No bid
No bid
250.00
Crimson long Maple
265.00
273.00
No bid
250.00
Emerald Queen or Emerald
230.00
No bid
230.00
220.00
Lustre Norway Maple
225.00
241.00
212.00
250.00
Columnar Norway Maple
225.00
241.00 (A)
219.00
250.00
Globe Norway Maple
350.00
No bid
No bid
225.00(0)
Green Mountain Sugar Maple
290.00
281.00
No bid
No bid
Hackberry
225.00
241.00
215.00
210.00
Katsura Tree
230.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
Turkish Filbert
265.00
No bid
234.00
225.00 (E)
Autumn Purple, i0einburg or
Skyline White Ash
275.00
270.00
258.00
240.00
Marshall Seedless, Summit or
Patmore Green Ash
194.00
241.00
205.00
200.00
Pumpkin Ash
350.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
Autumn Gold Ginkgo
275.00
286.00
No bid
306.00 (F)
Princeton Sentry Ginkgo
275.00
No bid
No bid
446.00
Skyline or Shademaster Honeylocust
265.00
240.00
212.00
220.00
Sentinel Crabapple
295.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
White Angel, Donald Wyman or
Ormiston Crabapple
249.00
No bid
139.00
No bid
Ironwood
265.00
267.00
No bid
280.00
Macho Amur Corktree
199.00
No bid
179.00
210.00 (G)
Bradford or Autumn Blaze Pear
260.00
220,00(8)
224.00
235.00
Sawtooth Oak
375.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
Northern Red Oak
275.00
286.00 (C)
No bid
255.00
English Oak
255.00
No bid
No bid
225.00
Greenspire Uttleleaf Linden
235.00
240.00
No bid
200.00
Redmond Linden
245.00
240.00
225.00
209.00
Substitutions
A - Parkway B - Chanticleer C - Red Oak
D - Laceleaf E - Y
Tree G - Common
Shannon
Arthur
Construction
Weiler Inc.
Services
No bid
230.00
No bid
230.00
280.00
230.00
280.00
230.00
No bid
230.00
No bid
230.00
245.00
230.00
No bid
230.00
No bid
230.00
No bid
230.00
230.00
230.00
No bid
230.00
No bid
230.00
305.00
230.00
250.00
230.00
No bid
230.00
130.00
230.00
No bid
230.00
220.00
230.00
240.00
230.00
No bid
230.00
290.00
230.00
No bid
230.00
270.00
230.00
265.00
230.00
Bid Results - Shade Tree Planting
August 28, 1990
1 1A' Trees - Unit Cost Per Tree
Hoff
Shannon
Charles 10shm
Landscape
St. Aubin
Berthold
Arthur
Construction
Species
& Son Nursery
Contractors
Nurseries
Nursery
Weiler Inc.
Services
Hedge Maple
275.00
No bid
144.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Purpleblow Maple
275.00
No bid
159.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Hackberry
179.00
No bid
144.00
165.00
100,00
150.00
Turkish Filbert
179.00
No bid
144.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Blue Ash
225.00
No bid
159.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Autumn Gold or Magyar Ginkgo
205.00
No bid
159.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Tuliptres
225.00
No bid
129.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Sentinel Crabapple
275.00
No bid
114.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Macho Amur Corktree
199.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
130.00
150.00
Bradford or Autumn Blaze Pear
199.00
175.00
139.00
No bid
130.00
150.00
White Oak
199.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
No bid
150.00
Northern Red Oak
199.00
No bid
144.00
No bid
150.00
150.00
Bur Oak
245.00
No bid
144.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Chinkapin Oak
245.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
No bid
150.00
English Oak
199.00
No bid
144.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Silver linden
199,00
No bid
129.00
No bid
No bid
150.00
Bid ResuMs - Shade Tree Planting
August 28, 1990
Larger Trees - Unit Cost Per Tree
Substitutions
A- Parkway 8 - Chanticleer
Hoff
Shannon
Charles l9shm
Landscape
St. Aubin
Berthold
Arthur
Construction
Species
& Son Nursery
Contractors
Nurseries
Nursery
Weiler Inc.
Services
3' Sugar Maple
365.00
375.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
475.00
4' Sugar Maple
600.00
470.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
550.00
5' Sugar Maple
600.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
No bid
750.00
3' Greenspire Linden
345.00
370.00
274.40
268.00
330.00
475.00
4' Greenspire Linden
445.00
490.00
449.00
390.00
No bid
550.00
5' Greenspire Linden
700.00
590.00
549.00
No bid
No bid
750.00
3' Marshall Seedless Green Ash
265.00
300.00
239.90
265.00
300.00
475.00
4' Marshall Seedless Green Ash
365.00
490.00
388.50
390.00
520.00
550.00
5 Marshall Seedless Green Ash
550.00
575.00
488.00
555.00
660.00
750.00
3' Skyline Honsylocust
299.00
360.00
269.90
280.00
320.00
475.00
4' Skyline Honeyloaust
399.00
490.00
474.00
400.00
No bid
550.00
5' Skyline Honeylocust
650.00
590.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
750.00
3' Norway Maple
299.00
361.00
289.90
280.00
330.00
475.00
4' Norway Maple
399.00
492.00 (A)
No bid
No bid
No bid
550.00
5' Norway Maple
650.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
No bid
750.00
3' Red Maple
315.00
375.00
299.90
No bid
No bid
475.00
3' Bradford Pear
299.00
285.00 (B)
289.90
296.00
300.00
475.00
4' Bradford Pear
450.00
320.00 (B)
No bid
No bid
No bid
550.00
3' Redspirs Pear
450.00
289.00
289.90
No bid
300.00
475.00
Substitutions
A- Parkway 8 - Chanticleer
Attachment B
Estimated QtantNes/Casts
Partial Order - 2112" Trees
Estimated
Charles 1,0ehm
Quantity
Species
14
Shannon.
Estimated
Purpieblow Maple
Charles 10ehm
Fbff
landscape
St. Aubin
Berthold
Arthur
Construction
Quantity
Species
& Son Nursery
Contractors
Nurseries
Nursery
Weiler Inc.
Services
20
Hackberry
$ 4,500.00
$ 4,820.00
$ 4,300.00
$ 4,200.00
$ 4,900.00
$ 4,600.00
30
Autumn Purple Ash
8,250A0
8,100.00
7,740.00
7,200.00
No bid
6,900.00
60
Skyline Honeylocust
15,900.00
14,400.00
12,720.00
13,200.00
15,000.00
13,800.00
20
Bradford Pear
5,600.00
No bid *
4,480.00
4,700.00
4,840.00
4,600.00
20
Northern Red Oak
51500.00
No bid *
No bid
5,100.00
5,800.00
4,600.00
30
English Oak
8,550.00
No bid
No bid
6,750.00
No bid
6,900.00
60
Greenspire Linden
14,100.00
14,400.00
No bid
12,000.00
16,200.00
13,800.00
240
Total
$ 62,400.00
$ 41,720.00 **
$ 29,240.00 **53$
.150.00 $
46,700.00 **
$ 55,200.00
Partial Order - 2 12" Trees
Hoff
Shannon
Estimated
Charles l0ehm
Landscape
St. Aubin
Berthold
Arthur
Construction
Quantity
Species
& Son Nursery
Contractors
Nurseries
Nursery
Weiler Inc.
Services
60
Emerald Queen Maple
$ 13,500.00
$14,460.00
$12,720.00
$ 15,000.00
$16,800.00
$13,800.00
25
Columnar Norway Maple
5,625.00
No bid *
5,475.00
6,250.00
7,000.00
5,750.00
20
Green Mountain Sugar Maple
5,800.00
5,620.00
No bid
No bid
No bid
4,600.00
50
Marshall Seedless Green Ash
9,700.00
12,050.00
10,250.00
10,000.00
11,500.00
11,500.00
20
Princeton Sentry Ginkgo
51500.00
No bid
No bid
8,920.00
6,100.00
4,600.00
10
White Angel Crabapple
2,490.00
No bid
1,390.00
No bid
1,300.00
2,300.00
30
Macho Amur Corktree
5,970.00
No bid
5,370.00
No bid *
6,600.00
6,900.00
215
Total
$ 48.565.00
$ 32,130.00 **
$ 35,205.00 **
$ 40,170.00 ** $
49 300.00 ** $ 49,450.00
1 1(2" Trees
Estimated
Charles 1,0ehm
Quantity
Species
14
Hedge Maple
14
Purpieblow Maple
14
Autumn Gold Ginkgo
14
Tuliptres
14
Northern Red Oak
13
Silver Linden
93
Total
St. Aubin
Hoff
Charles 1,0ehm
Landscape
& Son Nursery
Contractors
$ 3,850.00
No bid
3,850.00
No bid
2,870.00
No bid
3,150.00
No bid
2,786.00
No bid
2,587.00
No bid
$ 19,093.00
-
* - Bid Price was for substitute
St. Aubin
Berthold
Nurseries
Nursery
$ 2,016.00
No bid
2,226.00
No bid
2,226.00
No bid
1,806.00
No bid
2,016.00
No bid
1,677.00
No bid
$11,967,
00 -
** - Partial Total
Shannon
Arthur
Construction
Weiler Inc.
Services
No bid
$ 2,100.00
No bid
2,100.00
No bid
2,100.00
No bid
2,100.00
2,100.00
2,100.00
No bid
1,950.00
$ 2,100.00 **
$ 12,450.00
Village of !--aunt Prospect
,Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
11111rl1110":ill'I_�al:�i7�7 Z�7II:i
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: AUGUST 31, 1990
SUBJECT: RECONSIDERATION OF TOW TRUCK PURCHASE
At the last Board meeting, the staff presented a request to purchase a tow truck. We
indicated that we would go back and review options concerning the purchase of a 25 -
ton tow truck. We have done so and I have attached a memorandum from Director of
Public Works Herb Weeks.
The bottom line is that we were able to go back to the original distributor and reduce
the cost of the tow truck of $100,450 to $96,800. The vendor also agreed to give us a
trade-in for our existing tow truck which would bring the cost down to $90,320.
We then looked at the possibility of upgrading our existing tow truck. We could upgrade
our existing tow truck to a 16 -ton capacity. This would be the maximum that it would
be able to handle at a cost of $47,500. This would not give us the needed tonnage to
pick up the large Public Works trucks when loaded or the Fire trucks. We then looked
at the amount of times per year that we would possibly have to call in additional
equipment for the larger tows and estimate that cost at around $4,600 per year. In a
period of ten years, we would spend approximately $46,000 in today's money or the
equivalent of the price of the new vehicle would have a life of 20 years.
Also, if we were to retro -fit the existing tow truck, it would be out of service for
approximately 30 days when it would have to be in the contractor's shop for welding and
other work so we would have to be renting other tow trucks during this period of time.
After going through the additional work since the last Board meeting, I am still
convinced the most efficient approach would be to purchase the new 25 -ton tow truck
as originally requested. Over a 20 -year period of time, I believe it will save the Village
money and also save us a considerable amount of hours waiting time for another tow
truck from another agency to respond.
I recommend the purchase of a Vulcan 30.25 tow body mounted on a new International
truck chassis from R&R Truck Service, Inc., for the price of $90,320 including the trade-
in of our existing tow truck.
JO14N FULTON DIXO
JFD/rcw
attachment
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
W, INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7M crry USA
TO: Director Public Works
FROM: Vehicle/Equipment Maintenance Superintendent
DATE: August 28, 1990
SUBJECT: Tow Truck
In order for the Village's newer and heavier trucks to be towed
safely, it is essential that we purchase a larger tow truck.
Some questions have been asked about the specifics of this pro-
posed tow truck versus the existing tow truck. Hopefully, my
answers to these questions can help resolve this controversy.
1) What is the life expectancy of the existing size tow truck
versus the larger size tow truck?
The existing tow truck body is 12 years old. The tow body
was purchased in 1978 and was installed on a 1968 Chevrolet
chassis that was being retired as a dump truck chassis in
1978. In 1983, the chassis was replaced with the existing
1983 International chassis.
The proposed tow truck can be expected to be in service for
the Village up to an estimated time of 20 years. This is
due not only to the low mileage expected on this vehicle
but also because the proposed tow truck will have a hydrau-
lically operated body versus a mechanical (gear and sprock-
et) body which the existing tow truck has. The Public
Works Department has found, thru years of experience with
hydraulically controlled snow plows and salt spreaders,
that hydraulic power is very reliable and down time is kept
to a minimum.
2) If the Village purchases a smaller unit, such as the exist-
ing unit, how many times a year will we have to contract
out towing?
According to my records of the past eight months, we have
towed or winched vehicles 36 times. We have also used the
truck to change flat tires 11 times. With a smaller unit,
besides our own tows, we would have to contract a towing
company 12 to 18 times a year at an estimated cost to
$4600/year. It must be noted that this estimate is based
on a time period that included a mild winter. Towing costs
would escalate substantially for severe winter conditions
such as we had during the winter of 1978-1979 when the tow
truck was used 24 hours/day for two weeks straight.
We have used the tow truck for various duties in the past;
among these are the following:
Towed a dump truck which had lost its rear dual tires.
Winched stuck trucks out of the snow dump in the
winter.
Towed Fire Department vehicles, including the ladder
truck.
Winched a s * tuck Fire Department pumper out of the ice
at a fire.
Towed Police Department cars for body damage estimates
when cars were not mobile.
Towed Fire Department trailer from O'Hare Airport to
the fuel tank farms.
Raised trucks, tractors and sweepers to change flat
tires.
Towed the Park District's flatbed truck to Lattof
for rear axle repairs. (Truck had to be towed.)
Towed trucks and cars during the snows of 1978-1979
so we could open the streets for emergency equipment.
Recovered a safe from a pond on Camp McDonald Road
for the Police Department.
Winched out Village -owned garbage trucks which were
stuck at the leaf dumping site in Barrington during
leaf collection season.
Winched tractors out of retention basins when the
ground was wet and the tractors could not climb the
steep banks.
Winched tree limbs and stumps out of Weller Creek.
Used on 4th of July to tow disabled floats.
As you can see by the above, the tow truck is important not
only to the Maintenance Division of the Public Works Depart-
ment but to all other Village departments as well.
3) What is the cost of a scaled down version of the proposed
tow truck using the existing chassis?
A scaled down version using the existing chassis would cost
an estimated $47,500. This would include stretching the
existing frame to 12011, cab to axle (existing cab to axle
is 84"), and installing a 16 -ton body with boom and winch-
es. Please note that this is nine tons lighter than the
proposed tow truck, which has a capacity of 25 tons. With
the smaller unit, we could not tow the Fire Department's
larger vehicles or the loaded Public works vehicles.
4) What are the costs of trading in the existing tow truck
versus using the chassis to replace the existing flusher
chassis or flatbed chassis?
The cost of replacing the existing chassis on either the
flusher or the flatbed would be about $36,000. The cost of
the chassis is based on a recent chassis bid for the new
crane truck. The trade-in value of the tow truck is esti-
mated at $6500. As you can see, the existing chassis is
worth more if used with an existing piece of equipment than
if it were used as a trade-in.
5) What are towing policies in Arlington Heights and
Des Plaines?
Arlington Heights and Des Plaines both use contract towing
companies. Arlington Heights uses Hillside Towing, which
is also contracted by the Police to do their towing of
accident and abandoned cars. Hillside Towing has tow
trucks large enough to tow all Arlington Heights village
vehicles, including their Fire Department's.
Des Plaines uses Schimka Auto Wreckers. This is the towing
firm that tows for the Police Department. They also have
larger tow trucks to tow their Public Works trucks.
The Mount Prospect Police Department has a contract with
Prospect Autobody to tow accident and abandoned cars, but
they have small tow trucks only. The Public Works tow
truck is larger than the tow trucks Prospect Auto Body has.
6) What is the response time of local towing firms?
According to a March 1990 survey of local towing firms,
response time is 30 to 45 minutes under normal conditions.
For emergency conditions, such as snow, they could not
guarantee this response time. We also contacted some of
the surrounding communities and asked if they had experi-
enced any serious delays with their private towing firms.
Two communities experienced some serious delays in response
time. Arlington Heights has experienced up to eight hours
delay time, and Buffalo Grove experienced a nine -hour delay
just this last winter (1989-90).
With our Village owning its own tow truck, we have not
experienced any serious delays in the past, and we hope we
will be able to provide the same no -delay service to all
departments in the future.
I hope this will help resolve the controversy associated with
the proposed purchase of a new tow truck.
Guenther
JG/td
ADMIN/TOWTRKQS.TNS
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: August 29, 1990
SUBJ: Request to Reconsider
Bid for Tow Truck
On August 14, 1990, sealed bids were opened for the proposed
purchase of a heavy duty tow truck. This acquisition would be a
replacement unit for a 1978 tow truck with a ten ton rated capac-
ity. Our recommendation was to accept the bid of R & R Truck
Service Inc. for $100,450 on a Vulcan 30.25 tow body mounted on
a new International truck chassis. The replacement unit would
have a 25 ton rated capacity. Since this bid proposal was pre-
sented to the Village Board on August 21, 1990, our Superinten-
dent of Fleet Services and I have a couple of alternatives which
could be considered.
After discussions with the recommended bidder, R & R Truck Ser-
vice, concessions in the form of price assistance were made by
the truck manufacturer and the company building the tow body.
They were able to reduce the total cost by $3,630.00 for a deliv-
ered price of $96,820.00 per specifications. If the Village
Board would choose to reconsider this proposed purchase the
alternatives are as follows:
Alternative No. 1
Award the bid to R & R Truck Service Inc. as per specifica-
tions at an amount not to exceed their revised price -
$96,820.00 (Rated capacity 25 ton)
Alternative No. 2
Award the bid to R & R Truck Service Inc. as per specifica-
tions plus trade in our used tow truck. The price with
trade in - $90,320.00 (Rated capacity 25 ton)
Alternative No. 3
Take existing tow truck chassis and extend frame and all
new tow body. Cost not to exceed - $47,500.00 (Rated capac-
ity 16 tons)
It should be noted that our existing tow truck has a 10 ton
rated capacity which is not enough to pick up our larger trucks
or most Fire Department units. Our large dump trucks, when load-
ed, weigh approximately 19 ton and most fire trucks are 20 ton
and over. While the Alternative No. 3 at 16 ton capacity would
be more versatile it still would not be large enough to pick up
all equipment. To alleviate some concerned people it may be
prudent to consider Alternative go. 2 using our old unit as
trade in for a total replacement cost of $90,320.00.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W ary USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director of Public Works
DATE: August 20, 1990
SUBJ: Proposed Tow Truck Purchase
The Public Works tow truck is used to tow Fire Department vehi-
cles, Police Department vehicles, Public Works vehicles and on
occasion, Park District vehicles.
Public Works uses the tow truck not just for towing, but also
recovery of vehicles that are stuck year-round. on occasion in
the past winters we would.station the tow truck at the snow dump
site 24 hours at a time to winch snow hauling trucks stuck,
after dumping their loads and loosing traction due to no load
weight on the drive axles. We also use the tow truck to change
flat tires around town and on the road on all vehicles including
trucks, tractors and sweepers.
The Village purchased the existing tow truck in 1978. At the
time of purchase the tow truck was of sufficient capacity to tow
most of the vehicles owned by the Village excluding fire vehi-
cles.
In recent years the weights and capacities of the Village's
larger trucks have increased for better service and longevity.
For example:
A 1972 Dodge dump truck had an empty weight of 11,200 lbs. and a
gross weight of 27,500 lbs. This vehicle was replaced in 1984
with a 1984 International with a diesel engine (to provide bet-
ter fuel economy and performance over a gasoline engine). 1984
International dump truck has an empty weight of 17,600 lbs. and
a gross weight of 35,000 lbs.
The Fire Department has also purchased heavier vehicles includ-
ing set back front axles to accommodate the four man cabs. Due
to the weight and the set back front axles it is impossible to
lift the front ends of these trucks with the existing tow truck.
In the past, with the existing tow truck we would only flat tow
Fire Department trucks due to the front bumpers not being able
to hold the weight of the trucks. With the proposed tow truck
equipped with an underlift, we will be able to tow these trucks,
lifting them on the front axle and not on the bumper. The
underlift on the proposed tow truck will also benefit us when a
Public Works vehicle needs to be towed from the rear. In the
past we would have to remove the salt spreader and dump the load
of salt in order to tow from the rear.
The proposed tow truck versus the existing tow truck:
Existing VS. Proposed
GVWR 31,000 lbs. 39,000 lbs.
Wheelbase 152 in. 218 in.
Winch Capacity 10,000 lbs. 25,000 lbs.
Boom Capacity 10,000 lbs. 25,000 lbs.
Lifting Capacity 10,000 lbs. 25,000 lbs.
Underlift Capacity N.A. 13,000 lbs.
The existing tow truck is obsolete and the manufacturer (Chal-
lenger) is no longer in business, so parts are no longer avail-
able.
With the proposed tow truck we again could be up-to-date to
handle existing towing needs of all the Village departments and
be able to tow safely. The tow truck would also enable the
Village to be self-sufficient in their towing needs and not have
to rely on outside towing firms who would not be able to guaran-
tee response time so a disabled vehicle can be towed and put
back into service with little down time.
RE: Local towing services:
Local towing services were contacted and the following informa-
tion was given:
Business Rate
River Euclid Shell $85 per hour
299-3460
Ernies Towing Service $85 per hour
634-3737
O'Hare $75 per hour
Response time for each of the above would be 30 to 45 minutes
Under normal conditions, but they would not guarantee response
time in emergency conditions such as snow. A recent survey
indicated that the Public Works Departments in Buffalo Grove and
Arlington Heights had to wait 6 and 8 hours for service during a
late winter snow storm.
RE: Disposal of existing tow truck
The existing body has no resale value due to the company (Chal-
lenger) being out of business, no parts being available, and
also the new technology of the underlift tow trucks. We will
dismantle and junk existing body. The chassis will be used to
replace existing flatbed chassis or existing flusher chassis.
An evaluation of which chassis to be replaced will be made upon
receipt of new tow truck.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh