The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About3786_001Next Ordinance No. 4218 Next Resolution No. 36-90 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT O R D E R O F B U S I N E S S REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Room, 1st Floor senior Citizen Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER II. ROLL CALL Meeting Date and Ti Tuesday August 21, 1990 7:30 P. M. AUGUST 21, 1� Mayor Gerald "Skip'* Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg III. INVOCATION - Trustee Wattenberg IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, August 7, 1990 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. Request of Stan Welch for relief from regulations governing decorative fence in parkway. B. Appointment: Randy Toelke to Constitutional BiCentennial Commission C. PROCLAMATION: SCHOOL'S OPEN, DRIVE CAREFULLY D. Request for reimbursement of expenses incurred by Mr. & Mrs. Ward, 2 North Pine Street E. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 13.124 OF CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance provides for an appeal from the decision of the Local Liquor Commissioner to the Circuit Court of Cook County, as well as establishing the requirement to post a notice of closure on any establishment due to revocation of the local liquor license. (Exhibit A) F. A RESOLUTION EXTENDING THE HOURS FOR A SIDEWALK CAFE AT 14 WEST PROSPECT AVENUE ON A TRAIL BASIS This Resolution authorizes a trial period for extended hours to 9:30 PM for a sidewalk cafe at Sam's Place, 14 West Prospect Avenue. (Exhibit B) VIZI. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church 1400 East Kensington Road 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH, LOCATED AT 1400 E. KENSINGTON ROAD This Ordinance grants variations to permit a lot coverage of 61 rather than the permitted 35% in an R -X zoning district; 512 parking spaces rather than the required 543; and, a building height of 40 feet, rather than the permitted 28 feet. (Exhibit C) B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE BALLOT FOR THE NOVEMBER 6, 1990 ELECTION This Ordinance authorizes a question on the November, 1990 ballot as to whether the residents would support the construction of a new Public Safety Building at a cost of $6,992,000. (Exhibit D) C. ZBA 45-V-90, 519 S. Edward Street 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 519 S. EDWARD This Ordinance grants variations to permit a driveway 17 feet wide, a zero foot front setback and 0.5 foot side yard in order to have a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit E) D. ZBA 53-V-90, 319 S. Beverly lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 319 S. BEVERLY This Ordinance grants a variation to permit a 6 foot side yard in order to construction a room addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit F) E. ZBA 54-V-90 and ZBA 55 -SU -90, 32 S. Busse Road 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 32 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a 60 foot turn -around in a driveway and a special use to permit a 3 -car garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit G) F. ZBA 56-V-90, 112 N. Eastwood 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 112 N. EASTWOOD This Ordinance grants a variation to permit a 2 foot side yard and 15 foot height for a new garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the side yard variation by a vote of 4-1 and 5-0 to grant the height variation. (Exhibit H) G. ZBA 57-V-90, 20 Audrey Lane 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 20 AUDREY LANE This Ordinance grants variations to permit an 18" side yard setback and 30 foot driveway, at the widest point, for a parking apron. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit J) H. ZBA 58-V-90, 613 N. Russel 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 613 N. RUSSEL This Ordinance grants variations to permit a 16.5 foot wide driveway and a 2.5 foot side yard for a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit K) I. ZBA 59-V-90, 730 E. Northwest Highway lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 730 E. NORTHWEST HIGHWAY This Ordinance grants variations to permit a zero foot front yard, a 2.5 foot side yard, 100 % lot surface coverage and 10 parking spaces, instead of the required 21. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0. (Exhibit L) J. ZBA 61-V-90, 802 Dresser Drive lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 802 DRESSER DRIVE This Ordinance grants a variation to permit a 31 611 side yard in order to replace an existing patio. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit M) K. ZBA 62-V-90, 609 Noah Terrace 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 609 NOAH TERRACE This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a 15 foot rear yard for a room addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit N) L. ZBA 63-V-90, 607 Noah Terrace lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 607 NOAH TERRACE This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a 15 foot rear yard for a room addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit 0) M. ZBA 65-V-90, 1307 E. Ardyce Lane lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1307 E. ARDYCE LANE This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a 51 separation between an existing deck and proposed family room. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. (Exhibit P) N. Par Four Plat of Subdivision This Plat creates four lots of record for property located on West Golf Road. The Plan Commission recommends approving this subdivision 0. Plat of Easement This plat establishes a 20 foot easement for watermain on the Village owned property located at 443 West Rand Road. The Plan Commission recommends approving this easement. IX. NEW BUSINESS A. Safety Commission recommendations 1. The Safety Commission recommends the following amendments to the Traffic Code relative to Prospect Avenue: a. Two hour parking on the south side of Prospect Avenue between Central Road Mount Prospect Road as well as on the north side of Prospect Avenue between Main and Emerson Streets. on the north side of Four hour parking Elmhurst Avenue b" prospect Avenue between Elmh prose Street and 'between Emerson Scree and Main and Maple Street* north side Twelve hour meter parking on the Road Of Prospect Avenue bbetweCanMaplelstreetand C. Elmhurst Aprospect Road. nue and and Mount ER 18 ORDINANCE AMEND-- CHAPTER S. 1st reading of of THE VILLAGECODE regulations (Exhibit 4) (TRAFFIC CODE) This Ordinance establohes parking for Prospect Avenue. the Safety Commission request st of residents, Street at 2. At the a 'YIELD' sign on Henry recommends forest Avenue. AMENDING ARTICLE II ORDINANCE RELATIVE TO C. 1st reading of SINESS LICENSES) OF CHAPTER It ( CAH FARE RATES THE SENIOR CITIZEN TAXI rates for This Ordinance amends the taxicab to senior citizens and hand ientPbetween the rider provide for a 50/50 paYm of $3.0o as Village, up to a maximum 19501" and the , share, effective October 1, the Village's VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT sh Chipper " A. Bids: flatbed body 1. 1.21, Trailer moandealwithrcrane and 2. Truck chassi. system 3. Tow Trucken-channel flow monitoring Y 4" portable o p lot construction proposal for parking 25 S. Main Street B. Engineering P roo G Printing site, at the former EL TAS FUNDS C. ARE ro riates $356,100 from. MFT SOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR This Resolution apous er° ecce. Funds for D1st reading of ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE, SALE By PUBLIC AUCTION OF PROSPECT ONALpROPERoTfY ellaneous THE VILLAGE OF the Northwest This Ordinance authorize ublicauctionlbY equipment through p Municipal Conference E. Status Report SI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS SII. ADJOURNMENT (Exhibit R) (Exhibit S) (Exhibit T) MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AUGUST 7, 1990 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Mark Busse Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Leo Floras Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Theodore Wattenberg INVOCATION The invocation was given by Trustee Corcoran. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved APPROVE to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of MINUTES the Mayor and Board of Trustees held July 17, 1990. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floras, Van Geem, Nays: Wattenberg Pass: Corcoran Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $1,001,911 Motor Fuel'Tax Fund 3,003 Community Development Block Grant Fund 69,084 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 22,986 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 245,272 Parking System Revenue Fund 16,913 Risk Management Fund 80,861 Motor Equipment Pool Fund 1,093 P.W. Facility Construction Fund A - P.W. Facility Construction Fund B - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 491,991 Special Service Area Const. #5 - Special Service Area Const. #6 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 Debt Service Funds 36 Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund 41,794 Police Pension Fund 41,049 Firemen's Pension Fund 43,150 Benefit Trust Fund - $2,059,143 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem Nays: Wattenberg Motion carried. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Stan Welch, 1112 Greenwood, requested relief from the DECORATIVE regulation prohibiting a decorative fence in the parkway. FENCE IN PARKWAY: Mr. Welch stated that he had shown his plans to a 1112 GREENWOOD Page 1 - August 7, 1990 member of the Planning and Zoning Department and he was told there would be no problem with placing a• decorative rail fence'at the curb. Mayor Farley stated that sight obstructions could not be permitted in the parkway, however, staff would look into this matter and the decision will be made at the next meeting on August 21st. BUSSE SCHOOL Don Harmon, 16 N. William Street, stated that he had PARKING received a letter from Village Manager Dixon relative to the parking and use concerns of Suzuki School in the former Busse School building, however, he still feels the Board should make a ruling on having a business operation on property zoned for residential use. ALGONQUIN/BUSSE Lloyd Levin, resident of Crystal Towers Condominiums, RIGHT TURN stated that while the residents appreciate the Village's assistance in having the Illinois Department of Transportation (IDOT) prohibit right turns off Algonquin onto southbound Busse Road, the requests have been refused. Mr. Levin also noted that State Representatives and Senators had offered to meet with IDOT and discuss this matter, but the invitation has been refused. This past week the median strip for the left turn lane off Busse Road onto Algonquin Road has been reduced in width, which would appear to make exiting Crystal Towers even more dangerous for the residents. It was the decision of the Board to write a letter to Governor Thompson in an effort to secure cooperation from IDOT. Mr. Levin will be provided a copy of such letter. MAYORIS REPORT BILLBOARDS A Resolution was presented that would express the Village's support in legislation to restrict billboards on roadways. RES.NO. 32-90 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for passage, of Resolution No. 32-90 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF REFORMING THE HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION ACT Upon roll calla• Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. AMEND CH. 13 CLASS 11R11 An Ordinance was presented for second reading that DRAGON CITY would create a Class 11R11 liquor license for the Dragon City Restaurant, located within the Brentwood Shopping Center at Kensington and Wolf Roads. ORD.NO. 4210 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4210 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE (Dragon City, Class R) Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 2 - August 7, 1990 The request for a Class "C" liquor license for a packaged goods store, United Liquor Mart, within the Brentwood Shopping Center, Kensington and Wolf Roads, was withdrawn at the request of the Petitioner. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend Section 13:124 of Chapter 13 (Alcoholic Beverages) to provide that any appeal from the decision of the Local Liquor Commissioner must go before the Circuit Court, and that a notice be posted informing patrons that the liquor license for a specific establishment had been revoked due to a violation of local regulations. Trustee Van Geem suggested an alternate appeal process, possibly before the Village Board. Trustee Wattenberg asked that the senior citizens be informed of liquor license hearings. This Ordinance will be presented August 21 for second reading. CLASS "C" UNITED LIQUOR MART AMEND CH. 13 SEC.13.124 Mayor Farley asked the Board to ratify the action taken RATIFY ACTION in April granting an increase in the base salary of the INCREASING Village Manager from $68,000 to $70,000 and increasing VILLAGE the deferred compensation from $3,300 to $3,750 MANAGER'S effective May 1, 1990. SALARY Trustee Corcoran stated that he would not support the action due to the fact that he would like to see a more aggressive approach and there was room for improvement. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to ratify the action taken to grant a salary increase for Village Manager Dixon from a base of $68,000 to $70,000 and to increase the deferred compensation from $3,300 to $3,750. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg, Farley Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. OLD BUSINESS ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church ZBA 31-V-90 1400 East Kensington Road NORTHWEST At the request of the Petitioner, this matter was ASSEMBLY OF continued to the August 21st meeting of the Village GOD CHURCH Board, due to the fact that the attorney was out of town. An Ordinance was presented for second reading that SELL VILLAGE would authorize the sale of real property owned by PROPERTY: the Village, known as 443 West Rand Road, through 443 W.RAND RD sealed bids. Jane Conrad, 1006 Prospect Manor, expressed the concern of the residents that this property may be sold to the car dealer on Rand Road in order to expand his business. It was noted that there is a Restrictive Covenant on this land limiting development to single family residential development and the Village Board should state for the record that they would not re -zone the property. Trustee Busse asked if the proceeds from the sale of this land would go back to Special Service Area Number 1, which was created for the purchase of the water system within the Prospect Meadows Subdivision. Page 3 - August 7, 1990 Mayor Farley stated that he would support applying a portion of the proceeds to the outstanding balance of this Special Service Area. Trustee Corcoran asked that 50% of the proceeds be applied to the outstanding amount of Special Service Area Number 1. Mayor Farley stated that he would like to have further discussion on the allocation of proceeds from the sale of this lot at a future Committee of the Whole meeting. Attorney David Cohen, 600 Albion, noted that he is a resident of the Prospect Meadows area and asked the Board to consider a statement in the bid documents for this property that the buyer would be responsible to any costs incurred by the residents to defend the Restrictive Covenants, provided the residents were successful in their action. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to apply 50% of the proceeds of the sale of 443 West Rand Road to Special Service Area Number 1. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran Nays: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Motion failed. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to include language in the bidding documents for the sale of 443 West Rand Road that the successful purchaser would be required to reimburse reasonable costs incurred by the Prospect Meadows' Homeowners Association if they were required to defend the Restrictive Covenants in a Court of Law. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran Nays: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Motion failed. ORD.NO. 4211 Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4211 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (443 West Rand Road) Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. Bids will be received for the purchase of 443 West Rand Road until 5 PM on September 4, 1990 and will be opened at the regular meeting of the Village Board that evening. ZBA 47-V-90 ZBA 47-V-90, 1727 Bonita 1727 BONITA An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would grant a variation to permit a driveway 29 feet wide and a service walk 8 feet wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these variations by a vote of 6-0. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Wattenberg, Page 4 - August 7, 1990 seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Kays: None Motion carried. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4212 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY AT 1727 BONITA Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 49 -SU -90 and 50-V-90, 1420 W. Lincoln Street An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would grant a special use to permit a 3 car garage and variations to permit a driveway 30 feet wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur•, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4213 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1420 WEST LINCOLN STREET Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 51-Z-90 and ZBA 52 -SU -90, 1920 W. Golf Road An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would rezone this parcel from R -X to R-1. The Special Use was requested to permit a residential Planned Unit Development for the purpose of establishing a homeowners association to maintain the private street that would provide access to the 4 single family homes proposed. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the rezoning requested in ZBA 51-Z-90 by a vote of 6-0 and granting the special use requested in ZBA 52 -SU -90 by a vote of 6-0, however, it was the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals that the access roadway become a dedicated Village roadway with all the benefits of a dedicated roadway. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance relative Page 5 - August 7, 1990 ORD.NO. 4212 ZBA 49 -SU -00 ZBA 50-V-90 1420 LINCOLN ORD NO. 4213 ZBA 51-Z-90 ZBA 52 -SU -90 1920 GOLF RD to the rezoning request being the subject of ZBA 51 -Z -90 - Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4214 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4214 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, REZONING PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1920 WEST GOLF ROAD FROM R -X TO R-1 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. It was noted that since the residential Planned Unit Development would not be applied to this property, ZBA 52 -SU -90 was withdrawn by the Petitioner. While it had been decided at the last meeting of the Village Board that the roadway should not be a dedicated roadway, it was suggested by Village Manager Dixon that the Village accept the roadway, which will be built to Village standards, as a dedicated roadway with the provision that a covenant be recorded stating that the homeowners would be responsible for snow and ice removal. There was further discussion on this subject and it was recommended by Trustee Busse that the roadway be dedicated to the Village and enable the residents to all the benefits of a homeowner in the Village, including plowing and ice removal. Peter Lannon, member of the Zoning Board of Appeals, spoke in favor of a dedicated roadway with the homeowners receiving all the services provided by the Village. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to accept the roadway for the Par Four Subdivision as a dedicated roadway with no conditions attached. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Nays: Arthur, Corcoran, Wattenberg, Farley Motion failed. Tru ' stee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to accept the roadway for the Par Four Subdivision as a dedicated roadway subject to a covenant being recorded against the property providing for the individual homeowners to provide snow and ice removal for that roadway. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Farley Nays: Arthur, Corcoran, Wattenberg Motion carried. Page 6 - August 7, 1990 The Par Four Plat of Subdivision will be amended to reflect the dedicated roadway, with conditions, and presented to the Village Board at their next meeting on August 21st. Mayor Farley called a brief recess at this point, RECESS 9:58 P.M. The meeting was reconvened at 10:05 P.M. RECONVENE Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley Trustee Arthur Trustee Busse Trustee Corcoran Trustee Floros Trustee Van Geem Trustee Wattenberg NEW BUSINESS An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND CH. 18 amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) to established a WEIGHT LIMIT 5 ton load limit on Briarwood Drive, East and West. BRIARWOOD DRS. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved ORD.NO. 4215 for passage of Ordinance No. 4215 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 45-V-90, 519 South Edward Street ZBA 45-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit 519 S.EDWARD a driveway 17 feet wide, a zero foot front yard setback and a six inch (6") side yard in order to have a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 45-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented August 21st for first reading. ZBA 53-V-90, 319 South Beverly ZBA 53-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit 319 BEVERLY a 6 foot side yard in order to construct a room Page 7 - August 7, 1990 addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended, granting the request in ZBA 53-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An ordinance will be presented August 21st for first reading. ZBA 54-V-90 ZBA 54-V-90 and ZBA 55 -SU -90, 32 South Busse Road ZBA 55 -SU -90 The Petitioner is requesting a variation to ' allow 32 S. BUSSE RD a 60 foot turn -around in a driveway and a Special Use to permit a 3 -car garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the requests being the subject of ZBA 54-V-90 and ZBA 55 -SU -90 by a vote of 4-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the requests in ZBA 54-V-90 and ZBA 55 -SU -90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting of the Village Board on August 21st. ZBA 56-V-90 ZBA 56-V-90, 112 North Eastwood 112 N.EASTWOOD The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit a 2 foot side yard and a 15 foot height for a new garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the side yard variation by a vote of 4-1 and the height variation by a vote of 5-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to concur with the recommendations of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 56- V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented August 21st for first reading. ZBA 57-V-90 ZBA 57-V-90, 20 Audrey Lane 20 AUDREY LN The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit an eighteen inch (1811) side yard setback and a 30 foot driveway at the widest point, for a parking apron. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the variations by a vote of 5-0. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 57-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 8 - August 7, 1990 An Ordinance will be presented August 21st for first reading. ZBA 58-V-90, 613 North Russel ZBA 58-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit 613 RUSSEL * 16.5 foot side driveway and a variation to permit * 2.5 foot side yard setback for a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 58-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented August 21st for first reading. ZBA 59-V-90, 730 East Northwest Highway ZBA 59-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit 730 E. NORTH - a zero foot front yard, a 2.5 foot side yard, 100% WEST HWY lot surface coverage and to provide 10 parking spaces instead of the required 21 spaces. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 59-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented August 21st for first reading. Trustee Van Geem left the meeting for a brief period. ZBA 61-V-90, 802 Dresser Drive ZBA 61-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit 802 DRESSER a 31 611 side yard in order to replace an existing patio. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 61-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented August 21st for first reading. Trustee Van Geem returned to the meeting. Page 9 - August 7, 1990 ZBA 62-V-90 ZBA 62-V-90, 609 Noah Terrace 609 NOAH TERR The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a a 15 foot rear yard setback in order to construction a room addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0, provided the room addition is constructed with face brick to match the house. It was noted that the Petitioners in ZBA 62-V-90 and the next case, ZBA 63-V-90, are relatives and are requesting identical variations. The following residents expressed their opposition to the room addition: Gene Rockman 1201 Greenacres, on behalf of a resident Resident, 606 St. Cecilia Ray Messie, 611 Noah Terrace Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board.of Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 62- v-90, provided that no accessory structures will be allowed on this property. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting of the Village Board on August 21st, ZBA 63-V-90 ZBA 63-V-90, 607 Noah Terrace 607 NOAH TERR The Petitioner is requesting a 15 foot rear yard setback in order to construct a room addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 4-0, provided the room addition is constructed with face brick to match the house. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 63- V-90, provided by no additional accessory building would be allowed on this property. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the next meeting of the Village Board on August 21st. Trustee Corcoran left the meeting for a brief period. ZBA 65-V-90 ZBA 65-V-90, 1307 East Ardyce Lane 1307 ARDYCE The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a five foot (51) separation between an existing deck.and proposed family room. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the variation requested, with the condition that no additional buildings be permitted on this property. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to Page 10 - August 7, 1990 concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals in ZBA 65-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading on August 21st. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that REFERENDUM: would authorize a referendum question to be placed NEW PUBLIC on the ballot for the November, 1990 election as to SAFETY whether the residents would support the construction BUILDING of a new Public Safety Building at 112 East Northwest Highway at a cost of $6,992,000. This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at the next meeting of the Village Board on August 21st. A Resolution was presented that would authorize an amendment to the Northwest Central Dispatch System to include the Village of Palatine as a member. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of Resolution No. 33-90 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTEM Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize an amendment to the Enhanced 9-1-1 Dispatch system to include the Village of Palatine and the City of Prospect Heights. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution No. 34-90 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM OF NEW MEMBERSHIP IN THE ENHANCED 9-1-1 SYSTEM Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. CENTRAL DISPATCH: ADD PALATINE RES.NO. 33-90 9-1-1 RES.NO. 34-90 An Ordinance was presented that would amend Article II AMEND CH. 2 of Chapter 2 of the Village Code by moving,the existing verbiage governing the number of votes necessary to pass standard motions, which includes passage of resolutions and ordinances, from paragraph C to paragraph B. Trustee Floros asked why the Village Code requires standard motions to receive 4 affirmative votes for passage even if the all the members of the Board were not present, noting that if only 5 Board members were present it would seem that a 3-2 vote would be a majority and therefore the motion would pass. It was stated that the Village Code requires more than one - Page 11 - August 7, 1990 half of the Board 'then holding office' in order to declare a motion passed. Trustee Floros asked that the subject of votes required for passing various motions be placed on a future Committee of the Whole 'agenda for further discussion. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4216 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved for passage of ordinance No. 4216 - AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros Van Geem Nays: Wattenberg SUPPORT TRANSFER A Resolution was presented that expresses support for STATION: DES the proposed transfer site proposed at the intersection PLAINES of River (Des Plaines) Rand and Central Road in Des DOCKET NOS.5322 Plaines, which is the subject of a hearing before the & 5423 Cook County Zoning Board of Appeals. RES.NO. 35-90 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution No. 35-90 A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE SOLID WASTE AGENCY NORTHERN COOK COUNTY TRANSFER STATION Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur,, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. BUSSE ROAD The Busse Road Industrial Park Plat of Subdivision, PARK PLAT OF property formerly known as the Rosenow Property, was SUBDIVISION presented. The Plan Commission has reviewed the Plat of Subdivision, creating an industrial condominium complex on the west side of Busse Road north of the Tollway, and recommended approval. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his signature on the Busse Road Industrial Park Plat of Subdivision. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. SELL VILLAGE An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would OWNED PROPERTY: authorize selling a 1975 Fire Department Pumper, FIRE DEPT. which was recently replaced and no longer useful to the PUMPER Village. Page 12 - August 7, 1990 Trustee van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for ORD.NO. 4217 passage of Ordinance No. 4217 AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE (Pumper) Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. VILLAGE XANAGERIS REPORT Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the BIDS: following bid results. ELMHURST RD The following bids were received for the watermain WATERMAIN replacement on Elmhurst Road (Route 83) between REPLACEMENT: Golf Road and Lonnquist Boulevard: GOLF TO Bidder Total LONNQUIST Vincent DiVito, Inc. $248,170.00 Abbot contractors $277,261.;00 Genesis Construction $286,396.00 John Rendina Construction $290,555.00 Vian Construction $298,245.00 Mola construction $325,905.00 Lenny Hoffman Excavating $346,219.50 Szabo Paving $348,350.00 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved DI VITO,INC. to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low bid submitted by Vincent DiVito, Inc. in the amount of $248,170.00 for the watermain replacement on Elmhurst Road (Route 83) between Golf Road and Lonnquist Boulevard. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. The following bids were received for the reconstruction PROSPECT of Prospect Avenue, between Mount Prospect Road and AVENUE RE - Edward Street: CONSTRUCT Bidder Total Lenny Hoffman Excavating $394,770.80 Plote, Inc. $395,512.50 Arrow Road Construction $400,180.25 Triggi Construction Co. $434,779.00 Vincent DiVito, Inc. $440,060.00 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved LENNY to concur with the recommendation of the administration HOFFMAN and accept the low bid submitted by Lenny Hoffman EXCAVATING Page 13 - August 7, 1990 Excavating for the reconstruction of Prospect Avenue between Mount Prospect Road and Edward Street at a cost Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to authorize Camiros Ltd. to conduct the market review at a cost not to exceed $4,200 relative to the downtown redevelopment area. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: Floros Motion carried. Page 14 - August 7, 1990 of $394,770.80. Upon.roll call, Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. ELEVATED The following bids were received for the purchase of WORK an elevated work platform for the Public Works PLATFORM Department: Bidder Model Total Lift Systems, Inc. SJ 322011 Skyjack $ 5,900 Lakeland Equipment SJ 322011 Skyjack $10,900 Powerlift Ltd. SJ 322011 Skyjack $11,940 LIFT SYSTEMS, Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved INC. to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the low bid submitted by Lift Systems, Inc. for the purchase of a elevated work platform in an amount not to exceed $9,900. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. SEWER REHAB A request was presented to authorize final payment for FINAL CHANGE the sewer rehabilitation work for both the Prospect ORDERS: Meadows Sewer as well as other Village sewer work. PROSPECT MEADOWS ETC. It was noted that the grouting contract for the Prospect Meadows sewer program be reduced by $642.00, for a final amount of $16,620; that the Bob -O -Link sewer construction project be increased by an additional $15,288, for a final contract amount of $404,393; increasing the spot relay construction for sanitary sewer lines in the Village by $21,055; grouting for Village sewer reduced by $4,758 and that inspection engineering for the Village be increased by $6,000. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to concur with the administration and authorize the final change orders for the Prospect Meadows and various Village sewer projects as stated. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. CAMIROS: DOWNTOWN A request was presented to authorize Camiros Ltd. to REDEVELOPMENT proceed with the market review and survey in MARKET & SURVEY conjunction with the downtown redevelopment at costs not to exceed $4,200.00 and $7,000 respectively. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to authorize Camiros Ltd. to conduct the market review at a cost not to exceed $4,200 relative to the downtown redevelopment area. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: Floros Motion carried. Page 14 - August 7, 1990 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to authorize Camiros Ltd. to conduct the survey relative to the downtown redevelopment area at a cost not to exceed $7,000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: Floros Motion carried. A request was presented to waive the bidding LEAK procedure in order to upgrade existing leak detection DETECTION equipment, to be purchased from Fluid Conservation EQUIPMENT Systems of Austin Texas in an amount not to exceed $15,825. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved FLUID to waive the bidding procedure and authorize the CONSERVATION purchase of upgraded leak detection equipment from SYSTEMS Fluid Conservation Systems of Austin, Texas in an amount not to exceed $15,825. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: Floros Motion carried. A request was presented to authorize the contract WATERMAIN for watermain replacement on Oak Street and Council REPLACEMENT: Trail to be increased by $4,865-00, due to various OAK & COUNCIL problems experienced in performing the work. TRAIL Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and authorize an additional $4,865.00 for the water - main replacement on Oak Street and Council Trail. upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: Floros Motion carried. Village Manager requested authorization for the Mayor PUBLIC to sign and Clerk to attest his signature on the WORKS 3 year labor contract agreed on between the Village LABOR and the Public Works Union, ratified by the CONTRACT membership by a vote of 28 to 6. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to accept the Public Works Labor Contract for a 3 year period and to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his signature on the Labor Contract. Upon roll call: Ayes, Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A request was presented to increase the contract with 50/50 Lamp Construction for the 50/50 sidewalk replacement SIDEWALK program by an amount not to exceed $55,000. PROGRAM Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved LAMP for authorize an increase in the contract with Lamp CONSTRUCTION Page 15 - August 7, 1990 Construction for a total amount not to exceed $55,000. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. AWOURNMENT ADJOURN Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call: Ages: Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 11:29 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 16 - August 7, 1990 Gengral & Special Revenue Funds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund Motor Equipment Pool Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund Downtown Redev Const Fund 19851 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 Debt Service Fund Trust & Aeencv Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION August 16, 1990 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 8/01/90 through Per Attached Journal Balance 7131190 8116190 List of Bills Entry 8116190 $ 3,041,355 $ 794,371 $ 869,089 $ 2,966,637 518,638 113,213 47,355 584,496 3,675 73,000 72,881 3,794 11,727 50,000 61,622 105 3,328,129 162,361 390,805 3,099,685 219,691 13,318 56,462 176,547 1,177,291 14,666 94,487 1,097,470 502,880 765 649 502,996 246,700 873 4,960 242,613 140,689 1,683 764 141,608 769,679 5,134 - 774,813 6,699 3,531 4,440 5,790 1,374,553 15,803 21,626 1,368,730 14,770,110 110,517 - 14,880,627 16,693,801 122,100 - 16,815,901 259.836 - 259,836 $43.065,453 $1.481.335 ($1.625.140 r, $42.421.648 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS A C T CONSTRUCTION AIR ONE EQUIPMENT* INC. ALL AROUND CONSTRUCTION ALLEN ELECTRIC PAUL ANETSBERGER AVENUE BANK AND TRUST CO. OF 0 LUCILE L. BANNISTER BARTON-ASCHMAN ASSOCIATES♦ INC BETTEN ROLtUP DOOR BLUE JAY CORP. CENTRAL PLUMBING CO. CHICAGO RITE -LITE SIGNS CITIBANK• N.A. CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILEI CLEAN £ PRESS CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT W. S. DARLEY COMPANY DES PLAINES AUTO. SPRINKLERS DES PLAINES LAWN SPRINKLERS Ol"UCCI BUIt0ERSs INC. DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT DONOHUE C ASSOCIATES• INC. CHARLES ORESSNER KATHLEEN FINN FIRST NAT•L BANK OF MT. PROS. FIRST NAT•L BANK OF MT. PROS. FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8116190 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL BOND REFUND 6100.00 s100.00 FINAL -PARTS 688.39 $88.39 BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 SONO REFUND $75.00 375.00, WAGE DEDUCTION 1"185CH 7977 5625.10 $625.10 REFUND FINAL BILL 627.36 ' REFUND FINAL BILL $2.64 530.00 SITE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS $933.70 $933.70 2ND PMT -EQUIPMENT slOt000.00 $10*000.00* BOND REFUND 5$00.00 s1O0.00 BOND REFUND $75.00 575.00 BOND REFUND 6100.00 $100.00 PMT OF INS CLAIMS -GAB $5*399.41 PMT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS 51,0001.50 S6,0400.91* BONI) REFUND 5100.00 $100.00 BONO REFUND x$00.00 SIOf}.00 PMT-P/R 8/9/90 6224.25 $224.Z5* EQUIPMENT 61,#440.00 61,#440.00 BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 BOND REFUND $100.00 1100.00 BOND REFUND 525.00 525.00, P/R ENDING 8/9/90 s371s292.99 P/R ENDING 8/9/90 SLv602.45 P/R ENDING 8!9/94 5544.96 a P/R ENDING 8/9/90 535,#364.77 $4089805.$7* SERVICES RENDERED $31F168.7b $31p16d*76 BOND REFUND ;100.00 $100.00 BOND REFUND s1O0.40 5100.00 BOND REFUND $495.00 S4(t95.00 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 9 6122.59 # DUE TO FED DEP PAY 8/9 $858.92 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 8/9 $41.69 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 8/9 $2,#705.40 DUE TO FED OEP PAY 8/9 5119145.50 514.874.10* MEDICAL BENEFIT REIMS $4*440.29 '64,#440+296 VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 VENDUR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS G'fE• INC HELMETS $577.08 $577..08 ROBERT GRYBOS BOND REFUND 5100.00 $100.00 BRADLEY HORN REFUND LIQUOR LICENSE $2*000.00 32!000.00 HOMES BY HEMPHItts INC. BONO REFUND 52,400.00 BOND REFUND $2:400.00 BOND REFUND 31x200.00 BOND REFUND $1x200.00 BOND REFUND 31x200.00 SOV400.00 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT EMPLOYEE SHARE - JULY 1990 S15T347.61 EMPLOYER SHARE - JULY 1990 $35v128.69 550x476.30* JACKSON; LONG C ASSOCIATES REFUND Of OVERPAYMENT $812.00 $B12.00 A. JANCZAK BOND REFUND $100.00 5100.00 KATHY JASIAK BOND REFUND $35.00 $35.00 ANDREA JUSZCZYK PMT-P/R 8/9/40 $254.00 $254.00* MICHAEL E. KOSAC R/E TRANSFER TAX REBATE $332.00 $332.00 KUSTOM KRAFT BONO REFUND $535.00 $535.00 FRED L. LAMZ REFUND FINAL BILL 52.28 REFUND FINAL BILL $.22 $2.50 DENNIS J. MCDERMOTT BOND REFUND $50.00 $50.00 MILIEU DESIGN BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 W. MOEHLING REFUND FINAL BILL $2.28 REFUND FINAL BILL 5.22 $2050 MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY 6TH ALLOCATION-PPRT 5518.78 (518.78 NAPA-HEIGNTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY PARTS 5273.45 $273.95 NATIONAL SIGNS INC. BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 NORMANOALE PROPERTIES BONO REFUND $100.00 '5100.00 NUTRASMEET BOND REFUND SIV659.00 51*859000 OPUS BONO REFUND $100.00 SIOO.00 PAtDO SIGN G DISPLAY CO. BOND REFUND 51D0.00 BOND REFUND 5100.00 $200.100 TIMOTHY E. PALKA BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 KENNETH PANCZYK REFUND FINAL BILL $6.84 REFUND FINAL HILL 3066 $7.50 PEPPER CONSTRUCTION BOND REFUND $500.00 BOND REFUND 1425000 BOND REFUND $500.00 31.425.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAIGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8%16/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $10.00 Si.0.00* PATRICIA A. PEZENS BOND REFUND 5100.00 $100.00 PHOTO*S HOT DOGS BOND REFUND $25.00 325.00 JOHN L. PRIOLA BONO REFUND $500.00 '$500.00 R/C CONSTRUCTION CO. BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00$ GLORIA REBECHINI REFUND FINAL BILL SZO.52 REFUND FINAL BILL $1.98 522.50 ROUSE RANDHURST CORPORATION BOND RLFUNO $425.00 3425.00 SABLE CHASE APTS. BOND REFUND 5100.00 $100.00 JAMES SADOSKI BO'N'D REFUND 375.00 $75.00 SCARSDALE OEYEL OPMENT• LTO. BONO REFUND 675.00 BONO REFUND $75.00 $150.00 SOM REALTY REFUND FINAL BILL 5114.00 REFUND FINAL BILL $10.75 $124.75 PAUL W. SOHN R E TRANSFER TAX REBATE 5320.00 5320.00 GEORGE SOLLITI CONST. BOND REFUND $SOO.00 NO REFUND $500.00 $1,0000.00 MICHAEL SPITZ SONO"REFUND 515.00 $15.00 STEVEN'S ELECTRIC REFUND OUPL PMT Si7.50 $11.50 DAVID STOCK R E TRANSFER TAX REBATE $316.00 $316.00 SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO.* INC. EQUIPMENT 1565.00 $565.00 TCM CLEANERS BONO REFUND 5100.00 $100-00, VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT REINSPECTION FEE 01175 $50.00 REINSPECTION FEE 04817 125.00 REINSPECTION FEE 05003 $15.00 REINSPECTION FEE 05981 375.00 REINSPECTION FEE 06515 125.00 REINSPECTION FEE 06550 #25.00 REINSPECTION FEE 06786 $75.00 REINSPECTION FEE 07010 $75.00 REINSPECTION FEE CT27Z $55.00 REINSPECTION FEE C74ZZ $25.00 REINSPECTION FEE 07451 585.00 REINSPECTION FEE CT527 $25.00 REINSPECTION FEE 07673 515.00 REINSPECTION FEE 0852 $100.00 $730.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 4 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 81'1b/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AUG TRANS TO RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 5120: 600.00 AUG TRANS TO IMRF FUND $i•340.00 AUG TRANS TO I4RF FUND $240.96 AUG TRANS TO IMRF FUND $6.235.15 AUG TRANS TO IMRF FUND $97.62 AUG TRAMS TO GENERAL FUND $22*130.26 AUG TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND S19e950.00 ` AUG TRANS TO RISK MGMT FUND $400.00 AUG TRANS TO GENERAL FUND S3*677.59 SIT4.6T1.58 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AUG TRANS TO MFT FUND $14*700.00 $14v7OOoOO VILLAGE SEWER BOND REFUND $100.00 BOND REFUND $100.00 $200.00 WILLIAM NATLOCK BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 "ERMAN WILLEtSTEVE MILLE REFUND FINAL BILL 325608 REFUND FINAL BILL 32.42 `527.50 WOLF POINT REALTY BONO REFUND $110.00 $110.00 YORK E ASSOCIATES' INC. SERVICES RENDERED $890.00 5890.00 CLEARING ACCOUNTS ###TOTAL## $716v656.11 GENERAL FUND 5526*497.23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT SIP966.00 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 56is6zlod0 WATER E SESIER FUI40 $88P46I.83 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 54*25.1.03 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SIV212.91 CAPITAL IMFPRV. E REPL. FUND $5T7.08 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $41440.29 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 621.625.94 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE 1 30 -MIN TV PROGRAM - TAXES $150.00 $150.00# NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $56.00 $56.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $18.33 MISC EXPENSES 312.46 # VENDOR PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISrON SCHWEPPE 6 SONS WINDSOR PUBLICATIONS* INC. PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF M13ONT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION MISC EXPENSES COFFEE SUPPLIES PUBLICATONS $3v238.43 PAGE 5 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL (40.32 '171.11* $56.32 356.32 $29905.00 SZT 9O5.0O ***TOTAL** $39238.43 aaaaaaaa aa*saa*ansa**aaaaaaaaaaaasaaaaaa*a*as*a asaasa aa**a**aa*aaaaaaaa a*aaaaaaa**a**a�x�****a*a�asa*s�s�a VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE BEHAVIORAL ASSISTANCE TEAM REGISTRATION-FOLEY 135.00 135.00 CHICAGO TRIBUNE PERSONNEL RECRAJITMENT 5400.00 DOWNSTATE CITY MGMT ASSOC. THE HERALD KEY£• PRODUCTIVITY CENTER NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. JACK M. SIEGEL# P.C. SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RECOC3RCE MGT UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES HERBERT WEEKS VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT 1288.00 5688.00 REGISTRATION-DIXON 145.00 $45.00* AD $227.05 AD $155.35 3382.40 SEMINAR -PIKE $98.00 198.00 REGISTRATION-DIXON $220.00 $ZZO.00( OFFICE SUPPLIES $30.72 OFFICE SUPPLIES 322.12 352.84 MISC EXPENSES $2.10 a MISC EXPENSES $'19.86 MISC EXPENSES $10.55 a MISC EXPENSES 320.00 182.51* MTG• SUPPLIES♦ TRNG $1+41.87 31+4.87* LEGAL. SERVICES $4*461.95 $4*461.95 MEMBERSHIP - PIKE $145.00 1145.00 TYPEWRITER MTCE AGREEMENTS $14.513 Si4.50 AP'WA CONGRESS 6 EQPMT SHOW 1611.00 1611.00 ***TOTAL** $6*851.07 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $69-351.07 CABLE TV OPERATIONS ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE COO 575 9 36 S $50.00 $50.00 R.T. 9ENKINS NEWSLETTER 6 INSERT $300.00 5300.00 MELANIE KRUPP 80 MTG PROD CREW $25.00 525.00 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES REGISTRATION-PASALIC 5310.OG $310.00 ROBERT TOBA BD MTG PROD CREW $25.00 $25.00 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES TYPEWRITER MICE AGREEMENTS $141.00 5141.00 WHITE COLLAR SERVICES TEMP HELP -CASTING $366.27 $366.27 CABLE TV OPERATIONS REGISTRATIUN-WIDMER #TOTAL## 519217.27 GENERAL FUND $19217.27 3578.64 $578.64 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ARMOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION COLLECTION FEES $34.96 534.96 KEVIN 0. CRISWELL TUITION REIMBURSEMENT 5157.69 $157.69 CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED LABELS $66.59 $66.59 GOVERNMENT FINANCE OFFICERS A. 1 GAAFR STUDY GUIDE /10.00 $10.004 I.H.N. CORPORATION MTCE COMPUTERS E PRINTER 5194.0E MTCE COMPUTERS L PRINTER $52.00 $246.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 575 9 3G S $29736.20 $29736.20 ILLINOIS GFOA REGISTRATIUN-WIDMER $150.00 $150.00 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM SERVICE 3578.64 $578.64 NCR CORPORATION SUPPLIES $60.91 $60.91 PEDERSEN L HOUPT TRANSFER TAX TRANS -JULY 90 $350.00 5350.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 59.20 39.20# PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED PROGRAMMING SERVICES $641.25 $641.25 VENDOR FINANCE DEPARTMENT PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES XEROX CORP. XL/DATACOMP INC. FINANCE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND 'PILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE J/16/90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OFFICE SUPPLIES OTFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES OFFICE SUPPLIES TYPEWRITER MICE AGREEMENTS SUPPLIES MTCE SYCE—AUGUST $51824.80 INVOICE AMOUNT 345.48 119.69 161.34 38.13 $i01.50 $534.80 $12.42 ***TOTAL** PAGE 7 TOTAL $13+x.64 3101.5_ $534.6, 312.42 $5,824.80 R.T. JENKINS NEWSLETTER E INSERT $to 322.34 $1e3Z2.34 MIGHTY MITES AWARDS 6 SONS RETIREMENT PLAQUE—STARK $49.08 349.08 NATIONWIDE PAPERS PAPER 3833.75 $633.75 PA00OCK PUBTICATIONS INC LEGAL PAGE $24.37 324.3 UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES TYPEWRITER MTCE AGREEMENTS $14.50 314.50 VILLAGE CLERK S OFFICE ***TOTAL** 32V044.04 GENERAL 'FUND $2:044.04 RISK MANAGEMENT BROOKFIELD MEDICAL CLAIMS THRO 8/Zf90 $429748.28 MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 8/8,590 $10*395.2'5 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16190 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INYCICE AMOUNT TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT SUPPLIES Sb4.40 $64.40 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 8114190 5211140.76 's74*zB4.z9* CORPORATE POLICYHOLDERS COUNS. CERT OF INS PROGRAM STUDY $11482.50 $659.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. RISK MGT STUDY 3500.00 sie982.50 FLIRT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE C AUGUST 90 -LIFE INS $21309.75 s2w109.75* GAB BUSINESS SERVICES$ INC. REIMBURSEMENT 546.25 # PAID CLAIMS EXPENSE $96.00 663.01* REO KING SHOE STORE SERVICE FEES -AUGUST $11045.84 s107.0O RUBBER STAMP MAN PQ CLAIMS EXPENSE -JULY $12.00 $11200.09 ARTHUR 3 GALLAGHER G CO WORKERS COMP AUDIT 551869.00 $5,869.00 ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF EMPL SEC. UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS 111791.00 411791.00 NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S.C. SERVICES RENOERLO $37.50 $37.50 RISK MANAGEMENT REGISTRATIONS *#*TOTAL** 6871274.13 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND S8YrZa?4.13 $86.71 $88.74 INSPECTION SERVICES ENGELHARO CORPORAION SUPPLIES Sb4.40 $64.40 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE PERMIT FORMS $780.00 ENVELOPES $79.00 $659.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $6.72 MISC EXPENSES 627.00 MISC EXPENSES $21.19 # MISC EXPENSES '16.30 663.01* REO KING SHOE STORE WORK SHOES-HANNEMAN $107.00 s107.0O RUBBER STAMP MAN OFFICE SUPPLIES $10.00 s10.00 SOUTHERN ILL. UNIV* AT EDWARD. REGISTRATION - HANNEMAN $160.00 $160.00 SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL s5.00 $5.00 THaOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S ELEVAT0R INSPECTIONS $100,.00 1100.00 UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS REGISTRATIONS $90.00 690.00 VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS OFFICE SUPPLIES $86.71 $88.74 VENDOR INSPECTION SERVICES XLIDATACOMP INC. INSPECTION SERVICES GENERAL FUND POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PARTS AMOCO OIL COMPANY ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY BEHAVIORAL. ASSISTANCE TEAM BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES BUSSE CAR WASH, INC. CHEM RIFE PRODUCTS COMPANY C M1 9 INC* COMPUTC-RLANO THOMAS F. DALEY GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT GREATER COOK COUNTY POLICE HAINES E COMPANY HANSEN ASSOCIATES ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. KALE UNIFORMS RREST UNIFORMSv INC. LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL• INC VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION MTCE SVCS -AUGUST $1t559.54 PAGE 9 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $12.42 $12.42 ***TGTAL** SIV5 59.154 PARTS $ 429.00 $429.00 GASOLINE PURCHASES $13.12 $13.12 REPAIRS $51.00 $51.00 REGISTRATION-BEHUN $35.00 $35.00 SUPPCIE $142.15 (142.15 SERVICE $8.00 $8.00 WASH PLAN -JULY 90 $280.00 $280.00 CLNG SUPPLIES $298.24 $298.24 EQUIPMENT $39900.00 $3*900.00 SUPPLIES '335.00 $35.0 EXPENSES 6566.20 $566.20 REPAIRS $39.00 539.00 SUPPLIES $139.64 $139.64 1990 MEMBERSHIP DUES $120.00 $120.00 SERVICE $186.87 $186.87 MTCE AGREEMENT L COPIES $113.92 MTCE AGREEMENT G COPIES $275.85 $389.77 921 9 15 G '$21.54 575 9 3G S $300.00 575 9 3G S $$00.00 5421.54 UNIFORM SUPPLIES 523.59 !23.59 UN IFORM- EGELSTON $99.90 $99.90 PARTS $48.515 PARTS $78.93 VENDOR POLICE DEPARTMENT LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC* LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC MICHAELS STORES, INC. MIDWEST GANG INVESTGTRS ASSN. MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO NAPA AUTO PARTS DAVID T. NI'CHULSON NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOC.S*C. NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. RAY O*HERRON CO*9 INC. ERIC E. PIEE QUALEX9 INC. RONALD RICHARDSON SIMPSON EQUIPMENT CO. TEL OF ILLINOIS UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES 'PILLAGE SPORTS CENTER* INC. XL/DATACOMP INC. ASIF YUSUF POLLEE DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE LO ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16190 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PARTS $3.41 PARTS 53.41 PARTS $82.95 PARTS $15.00 PARTS $31.50 $263.76 PHOTO SUPPLIES $100.55 PHOTO SUPPLIES $451.20 $551.75 SlUPPL I ES $170.60 SUPPLIES (47.02 $217.62 P R SUPPLIES $61.38 $61.38 MEMBLRSHIP RENEWAL-GIBSUN $10.0u $10.00 PARTS $193L8*90 $19328.90 PARTS $123.60 $123.60 EXPENSES $306*85 $306.85 EMPLOYMENT TESTING $117.82 $117.82 OFFICE SUPPLIES $14.45 'S14.45 BLANKETS $73.16 $73.16 REPAIRS $430.00 $430.00 FILM PROCESSING $272.00 $272*00 EXPENSES $19054.20 $1x054.20 PARTS $97.72 $97.72 CABLt BILL -POLICE $4.75 54.75 TYPEWRITER MTCE AGREEMENTS $309.5U $309.5C AMMUNITION 521.00 $21.00 MTCE SVCS -AUGUST $62.10 $62.10 AMMUNITION $19253.25 $i*2'53.25 ***TOTAL** $139751.83 $99851*83 CAPITAL IMPRV. S REPL. FUND $39900..00 ****************" ***********a******** *************** ****" VENDOR FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADVANCED ELECTRONIX AIR ONE EQUIPMENT: INC. AMOCO OIL COMPANY DON ANDERSON ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES* INC ASSOCIATED RADIOLOGISTS CTO. JACK MENDER TRAILERS BOWEN HARDWARE CO $UC OM CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS CENTEL CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE* COMMONWEALTH EDISON CUMBERLAND SERVICENTER INC. W. S. DARLEY COMPANY DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN 'ELVCATION ALLIANCE FAGEL EMS SPECIALTIES FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE FULTON CONTRACTING CO. GFE v INC VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE it ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SUPPLIES $50.00 350.00 FINAL -PARTS $6.29- $6.29 GASOLINE PURCHASES $21.25 S2t.25 REIMB-DINNERS $66.65 $66.65 SERVICE 576.28 SERVICE $107.08 SERVICE $80.31 5263.67 SERVICES RENDERED $43.5U $43.50 FIRE TRNG PROGRAM $2V125.00 S2VI25.00 CREDIT S5.98 - SUPPLIES S16.42 SUPPLIES $5.29 SUPPLIES 349.95 CREDIT St.09- SUPPLIES $3.79 $68.38 REPAIRS $57.00 $57.00 SERVICE 360.28 $60.28 070 U057060 0 $145.16 Siri5.16 REPAIRS 5138.00 3138.00 RADIO MTCE $90.70 SERVICE $491.83 SERVICE S25t.5U S634.0 BA77-JT-2404-A 17.60 57.60 EQUIPMENT MTCE 310.05 EQUIPMENT MTCE $10.05 SAFETY INSPECTION $30.15 550.25 EQUIPMENT S160.17- $160.I7 PARTS $223.25 1123.25 SERVICE $243.00 $243.00 COMPUTE,? SERVICE $150.00 COMPUTER SERVICE $105.75 $255.75 FINAL -PAYMENT S60.3i) x60.30 PRINTING SERVICES 539.00 $39.00 SERVICES RENDERED $291U0.Q0 $29100.00 HELMETS $101.03 HELMETS 58.35 VILLAGE UE MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/'90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FIRE £ EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. EQUIPMENT 5709.82 CREDIT EQUIPMENT $672.90- $146.30 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES REPAIRS $9.75 59.75 W. W. GRAINGER INC. EQUIPMENT '5253.65 EQUIPMENT 5115.16 CREDIT EQUIPMENT $205.69- $163-12 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $336.30 $336.30 HANSEN ASSOCIATES MTCE AGREEMENT E COPIES $113.92 $113.92 EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES $79.81 $79.81 HUGO•S MAC TOOLS TOOL $34.75 PARTS $150.95 1185.70 IGE! INCORPORATED CYLINDER RENTAL $19.00 $19.00 ILLINOIS SELL TELEPHONE CO. 575 9 36 S $400.00 560 9 15 G $88.37 $488.37 KAR PRODUCTS INC SUPPLIES 5218.96 $218.96 J. E. KREGER E CO. EQUIPMENT MTCE $640.00 $640.00 LIFETREE SOFTWARE INC. COMPUTER. PROGRAMMING $83.00 $83.00 MEDICAL PRODUCTS EQUIPMENT 5726.75 $726.75 NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY PARTS 6883.01 $883.01 NAT*L. COORDINATING COUNCIL OF DUES -CAV ELLO (75.00 $75.00 NCCEM HEADQUARTERS MEM13ERSHIP-THILL $75.00 $75.00 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL REGISTRATIONS -PARAMEDIC CLASS $1*650.00 SL#650.00 NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC PARTS $11L.52 $121.52 PAGE AMERICA SERVICE 3158.26 SERVICE 354.60 SERVICE 340.96 SERVICE $34.13 SERVICE $27.30 SERVICE 520.48 1245.73 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $10.54 a MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG 54-00 MTG* SUPPLIES♦ TRNG $3.32 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $68.81 MTG• SUPPLIES* TRNG $22.09 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $33.63 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG S3.2'1 VENDOR FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. R.E.D. CENTER STEVE RHODES SPECIALIZED RESCUE SYSTEMS: IN STREAMWOOD PLATING CO** INC. UNO-VEN PRODUCTS UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES WAtGREENS GREG WEIBEL TOM WHITE FIRE Z EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENERAL FUND HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAIGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL MTG. SUPPLIES* TRNG $6.00 REIMB MTG, SUPPLIES. TRNG 512.70 AMERICAN TAXI CO.*INC. MTG9 SUPPLIES• TRNG $9.00 # MTG: SUPPLIES* TRNG $23.06 = MTG. SUPPLIES* TRNG $15.94" $12.00 MTG: SUPPLIES* TRNG $25.23 REIMB MTG• SUPPLIES9 TRNG $8.41 5246.00# REGISTRATION-FIGOLAHP BURGER $200.00 $200.004 REIMS SUPPLIES 317=56 $17*56 SUPPLIES $22.50 $22.50 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE $150.00 $150.00 FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM $218.30 $218.30 TYPEWRITER MTCE AGREEMENTS $64.50 $64.50 SUPPLIES 593.98 $93.98 REIMBURSEMENT $10.36 $10.36 REIMS SUPPLIES $19.96 $19.96 ###TOTAt#* S13*880.01 $13*397.14 CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND 5482.87 RITA ADAMCZYK JULY DRIVER REIMB $3.00 13.00 AMERICAN TAXI CO.*INC. SENIOR TAXI RIDES $1*033.50 Si:033.50 LEONARD W. BAZAN JULY DRIVER REIMB $12.00 $12.00 SHARON 3LAZEK JULY DRIVER REIMB $3.00 $3.00 DARYL BOYD JULY DRIVER REIMB $12.00 $12.00 LIZ BRANDL JULY DRIVER REIMB $3.00 $3.00 MICHAEL DOROSH JULY DRIVER REIMB 56.00 $6.00 COLLEEN ESENBERG INTERN STIPEND 1150.00 VENDOR HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION HAZEL FRICKE DAILY HERALD BILL, HESS ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. KEEFER'S PHARMACY LISA LEVIN RAY LUNDIN EARLE MATTSON PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. OTTO SCHERR JEANNE SHERMAN SPRINGHOUSE BOOK CO. BERTHA STEIL SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO.x INC. UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES KATHI WESLEY HELEN WHITLOCK VIRGINIA ZITO HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION GENERAL FUND PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16190 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL JULY DRIVER REIMB $21.00 SITI.00 JULY DRIVER REIMB $6.00 36.00 SUBSLRIPTION 1162.76 $162.76 JULY DRIVER REIMS $3.00 53.00 575 9 JG S $200.00 $20*497.40 339 9 3G S 530,.36 5230.3E MEDICAL SUPPLIES $95.85 $95.85 JULY DRIVER REIMB $9.00 59.00 JULY DRIVER BEIM€i $27.00 527.00 JULY DRIVER REINS $9.00 $9.00 MISC EXPENSES $17.00 MISC EXPENSES 591.40 $108.40# JULY DRIVER REIMB 112.00 $12.00 JULY DRIVER REIMS 19.00 59.00 PUBLICATION 519.30 $19.30 JULY DRIVER REIMB $9.00 39.00 EQUIPMENT S565.00 $565.00 TYPEWRITER MTCE AGREEMENTS 537*5u $37.50 JULY ORIVER REIMB 59.00 $9.00 JULY DRIVER REIMB $6.00 15.00 JULY DRIVER REIMB $21.00 $21.00 ***TOTAL** $2x582.61 $Z,#582.67 ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION BOXWUOO DRIVE IMPROVEMENTS $48*418-,.65 $489418.65 ANGELA CHIARELLO CDBG-406 E KENSINGTON 3415.00 $415.00 THE DRAWING BOARD INC. ENVELOPES 5276.01 3276.01 JVI ASBESTOS RMVL-S/C $20*497.40 $20x497.40 VENDOR PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT MICHAEL J. MORAN NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. REI TITLE 'SERVICES SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C UNITED BUSINESS MACHINES VANS ARTISTS DESIGNERS SUPPLIE ZONING BULLETIN PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND STREET DIVISION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 PURCHASE DESLRIPTIUN INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL SERVICES RENDERED $184.00 $184.00 OFFICE SUPPLIES $131.78 $131.76 MISC EXPENSES $46.61 MISC EXPENSES $1.61 $48.22* CDBG 31,3 N OWEN 5150.00 $150.00, SERVICES RENDERED $16250.00 $11250.00, TYPEWRITER MTCE AGREEMENTS $25.00 $25.00 SUPPLIES $21.45 $21.45 ZONING BULLETIN 648.93 "x48•.93 ***TOTAL** $716466.44 $551.39 COMMUNITY DEVL'PMT BLOCK GRANT $707915.05 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BLDG SUPPLIES $59.13 BL OG SUPPLIES 542.01 BLDG SUPPLIES $23.79 BLDG SUPPLIES $5.71 BLDG SUPPLIES $69.12 SLOG SUPPLIES $83.99 BLDG SUPPLIES $18.12 BLDG SUPPLIES (65.18 $367.05 AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS 535.49 PARTS $9.60 PARTS $13.24 $58.33 ALBIN CARLSON C CO. BIDGE MAINTENANCE $126646.30 RIDGE MAINTENANCE $200.00 $126846.30 ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC• INC. TRAFFIC SIGNAL MICE JULY 90 $16968.75 $16968.75 ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING MATERIAL $415.12 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16190 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION MATERIAL $93.18 3138.30 AM -LIN PRODUCTS# INC. PARTS $66.45 PARTS $34.72 $101.17 AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES* IN SUPPLIES $90.90, $96.42 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY UNIFORM SERVICE 579.20 UNIFORM SERVICE 379.20 $158.40 ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO. MTCE AGREEMENT S140.QQ 1140.00 ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS PARTS $31.96 $31.96 ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION FOREST AVE RECONSTRUCTION $26#904.56 $26*904.56 BILL°S LAWN E POWER PARTS $1.42 $1.42 MELVYN BOTH REIMS-SAFETY SHOES $50.00 $50.00 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER SUPPLIES $165.15 SUPPLIES 3124.12 SUPPLIES $74.14 SUPPLIES $5014 '$368.55 WM. C. BROWN PUBLISHERS BOOKS $52.85 '$52.85 BUCKERIDGE DOOR CO. SERVICES RENDERED $54.00 $54.00 BUSSE HARDWARE SUPPLIES 38.25 SUPPLIES $21!58 SUPPLIES $8.38 SUPPLIES $10.63 $48.84 BUSSE CAR WASH* INC. VEH WASH $35.00 $35.00 CAGE INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 5273.35 SUPPLIES $273.35 SUPPLIES $399.00 $945.70 CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY CLNG SUPPLIES $299.00 CLNG SUPPLIES 5180.31 $+i 79.31 CHICAGO TURF E IRRIGATION SUPPLIES $213.19 $213.19 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS CLNG SERVICE $1*836.00 CLNG SERVICE $64.00 Sis900.00 COMMONWEALTH EDISON SERVICE JUNE 90 $8*997.45 SERVICE JUNE 90 $5:835.65 514#833.$0 CONSOLIDATED STEEL AND SUPPLY SUPPLIES 3535.80 $535.80 ED CURTIS RENTAL: INC. RENTAL 3F r1ELIUM CYLINDER $22.50 '$22.50 DOMBROWSKI G HDLMESt INC. CATCH BASIN CLEANING 3319620.00 $31*620.00 DURABLE PAVING CO. ALLEY REPAVING $39415.00 $3#415.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE IT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION E. 0. ETNYRE AND CO. PARTS $36.46 336.46 FINISHMASTER9 INC. SUPPL'IEi $52..68 SUPPLIES $42.00 $94.68 THE GLIDDEN COMPANY SUPPLIES $39.81 SUPPLIES $108.98 SUPPLIES $28.62 SUPPLIES 353.08 SUPPLIES 3265.40 3+495.89 HELLER LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES 322.00 SUPPLIES E696.69 SUPPLIES $107.70 SUPPLIES SiO.24 SUPPLIcS $25.40 SUPPLIES 35.40 SUPPLIES $39.93 $907.36 EDWARD HINES LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES ;15.99 $15.99 I.B.M. CORPORATION EQUIPMENT $19100.00- 51.100.00 ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK L EQUIPMENT PARTS $591.08 5591..08 INGRAM ENTERPRISES• INC. TURF MOWING $T00.00 TURF MOWING $700.00 $LV400.00 NELS J. JOHNSON PKWY TREE TRIMMING $69102.00 568102.00 A. LAMP CONSTRUCTION CO. SHARED COST SIDEWALK $119700.00 $119700.00 LAND AND LAKES CU DUMPING FEE -JULY 90 $220.00 5220.00 LATTUF LEASING AND RENTAL. INC PARTS $30.94 PARTS $3.08 PARTS $17.40 PARTS 350.00 - PARTS Si5.27 $Lb.69 LENNY HOFFMAN EXCAVATING• INC. SCHOENf3tCK RO RECONSTRUCTIION $319849.65 $319849.65 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES $11.29 SUPPLIES 516.95 SUPPLIES '$20.75 SUPPLIES $5.50 SUPPLIES $14.61 SUPPLIES 914.10 183.20 MEYER MATERIAL CO. LIMESTONE SCREENINGS $564.63 $564.63 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/"16190 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAIL STREET DIVISION MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO PARTS $109.91 PARTS $502.96 '5+612.93 NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS 133.00 PARTS $8.92 PARTS $4.55 PARTS $4.55 PARTS 14.67 PARTS $123.60 PARTS Ti23.60 $302.89 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 316.19 SUPPLIES $40.37 SUPPLIES $10.96 SUPPLIES '$22.21 SUPPLIES $2 5.95 SUPPLIES $277.03 $392.71 P L W INDUSTRIAL SALES* INC. PARTS $10.13 510.13 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC FINAL -LEGAL PAGE 529.25 FINAL -LEGAL PAGE 529.25 $58.50 PERMALAWN INC PARTS $6.94 PARTS $6.94 $13.88 R. A. PETERSON CO. ASPHALT SEALER $1*700*00 %i:700.00 PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG %2.18 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $3.09 $5.21 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL E EXPENSES $13.92 TRAVEL E EXPENSES SIS..IZ TRAVEL E EXPENSES 52.68 TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $4.1Z TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $8.34 TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $3.63 TRAVEL. E SUPPLIES 56.39 � TRAVEL E SUPPLIES 5138.45 3192.65* ROSEMONT BUILDING E SUPPLY CO. SUPPLIES 596.20 SUPPLIES $333.30 $429.50 WALLY SCHULTZ REIMB-SAFETY SHOES $50.00 $50.00 SHEPP PEST CONTROL PEST CONTROL SERVICE AUGUST $40.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICE AUGUST 140.00 VENDOR STREET DIVISION SOlt C MATERIAL CONSULTANTS• I SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY SQUIRE COGSWELL COMPANY STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY STATE FIRE MARSHAL TCI OF ILLINOIS TECH STN CORPORATION TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY ANDY TIERNEY WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES STREET DIVISION GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAx PEST CONTROL SERVICE AUGUST $40.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICE AUGUST $40.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICE AUGUST 340.00 PEST CONTROL SERVICE AUGUST 6440.00 $240.00 MATERIAL TESTING $8.00 MATERIAL TESTING 1459.00 MATERIAL TESTING 3300.00 MATERIAL TESTING 624.00 MATERIAL TESTING $32.00 MATERIAL TESTING $48.00 31,371.00 SUPPLIES 310.39 SUPPLIES $7.00 MTCE SUPPLIES 3168.70 $186.09 SUPPLIES $75.36 $75.36 FLUSH VALVES 3223.73 $223.73 REGISTRATION FEE $600.00 REGISTRATION FEE s100.00 REGISTRATION FEES 6700.00 51.400.00* PW CABLE BILL 311.50 $11.50 PARTS $14.96 $14.96 CYLINDER RENTAL 612.95 SI2.95 REIMB-SAFETY SHOES 650.00 sS0.0I SUPPLIES 3194TO.20 PAINT 356.60 BARRICADES $262.50 ?29289.30 PARTS $143.90 $143.90 ***TOTAL** $16091415.38 $1i29790.12 MOTOR FRTEE TAIL FUND $41#355.26 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAIGE 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTIUN INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION A -SPECIAL ELEC.SERV.G SUP• CD. PART $2S.Z0 625.20 ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. 13LOG SUPPLIES $26.99 (26.99 AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $35.49 PARTS 540.06 '475.155 ALLEN TESTPRODUCTS PARTS 5112.45 $112.45 AMERICAN LINEN SUPPLY UNIFORM SERVICE $79.20 UNIFORM SERVICE $79.20 $156*40 W. E. ANDERSON PARTS S316.Z1 $316.21 ARLINGTON AUTO PARTS PARTS $4.55 PARTS $31.96 PARTS $7.38 $43.89 ARLINGTON HIS CAMERA FILM $137.00 $137.00 AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES SERVICES RENDERED S460+46 SERVICES RENDERED 1306.85 SERVICES RENDERED $355.71 S1*123.04 BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER SUPPLIES $165.16 $165.16 BUSSE CAR WASH* INC. VEH WASH $145.52 $145.52 CADE INDUSTRIES SUPPLIES 6399.00 $399.00 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY RETIREMENT CAKE $61.25 $61.25 COMMONWEALTH EDISON B872 -JT -5608-0 $169.81 $i69.8t CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT•L 8K OPER/MAINT COSTS-JAWA $15:S78.00 VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS -JAMA $i0713ZI.00 CAKE WATER PU'RCHASt-JAWA $130* 104.00 POWER CASTS-JAWA $11*068.00 $264*071.00 DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS9 IN INSPECTION CNG (80.00 580.00 E L H UTILITY SALES PARTS 1140.90 REPAIR PARTS 5719.10 $860.00 ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO. SUPPLIES $148.00 $I48.00 FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP PRIORITY LETTER $15.50 '115.50 THE FILE MART OFFICE SUPPLIES /81.00 $81.00 FINISHMASTER• INC. SUPPLIES $69.31 $69.31 GLENBROOK EXCAVATING WATER MA114 REPLACEMENT $12*193.75 6 WATER MAIN REPLACEMENT $43227.50 S16*421.250 H -8-K WATER METER SERVICE WATER METER EXCHANGES $M34.54 WATER METER LABOR SLII.18 WATER METER EXCHANGES $137.52 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER METER LABOR $88.94 MATERIAL $123.57 WATER METER LABOR $133.41 MATERIAL 365.96 METER EXCHANGES $103.14 MATER METER LABOR (111.18 MATERIAL $287.79 ' METER EXCHANGES ;343.80 $29641.03 HARCO TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION MTCE SERVICE $15425.00 519425.00 I.B.M. CORPORATION EQUIPMENT $25380.04 EQUIPMENT $90.00- MTCE COMPUTERS C PRINTER $194.00 MTCE AGREEMENT S100.43 MTCE COMPUTERS E PRINTER 152.00 $25636.43 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 575 9 15 G 6 8.98 575 9 3G S $300.00 347 9 3G S $26.66 $345.64 JOEL KENNEDY CONSTRUCTION CO. SERVICES RENDERED 53*725.00 $35725.00 LATTOF LEASING AND RENTALS INC PARTS $80.40 PARTS 510.05 PARTS 514.78 $105.23 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIES "$35.30 $35x3{ LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS 6 OFFIC OFFICE SUPPLIES 5107.76 $107.76 MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC 'SERVICE-JULY 90 $39.IT $39.iT MOTOROLA9 INC. MICROPHONE $88.00 REPAIRS $60.00 $148.00 MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO PARTS 5314.64 $314.66* NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS $12.39 PARTS $72.28 PARTS $123.60 $208.27 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CABLE SUPPLIES $696.72 REPAIR%MAINT MATERIALS (135.66 $832.38 NET MIDWEST• INC. WATEK SAMPLING $185.00 $185.00 NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 1618 1/2 BONITA DR '$16.10 117 N WAVERLY $13.18 NS KENSINGTON IE RAND RD $13.59 x42.87 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 22 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8/16/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES $493.73 SUPPLIES $48.24 $541.97 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES SIL1.91 3121.91 P/F MATERIALS, INC. MATERIALS SIV230000 SIe230.O0 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL NOTICE $20.00 LEGAL NOTICE $20.00 340.0( PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL & EXPENSES $37.45 TRAVEL E EXPENSES 312.95 TRAVEL & EXPENSES $7.18 TRAVEL E EXPENSES $70.23 TRAVEL E EXPENSES $28.35 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $2.11 � TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $21.82 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $5.30 # TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $.77 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES $3.50 $189.72* PORTABLE TOOL SALES FINAL - PARTS 1133.81 $133.81 POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR MATER BILLS $330.80 0 POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS $426.51 $757.31* PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 1184.22 $184.22 R. C. TOPSOIL TOPSOIL -JULY 90 $405.00 1405.00 RAINBOW i HR PHOTO EXP. FILM & PROCESSING (13.11 PHOTO SUPPLIES $15.03 FILM L PROCESSING 529.08 FILM E PROCESSING $6.59 FILM £ PROCESSING $6.89 FILM & PROCESSING $20.67 FILM C PROCESSING 127089 $119.23 SIDENER SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES $719.00 $719.00 STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC. PIPE -PVC $7.91 17.91. TECH STN CORPORATION PARTS $10.10 $10.10 THE TEXWIPE COMPANY SUPPLIES $84.83 $84.83 TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI SUPPLIES $16.70 516.70 V G G PRINTERS INC. SUPPLIES $114.65 $114.65 WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES PARTS $143.89 PARTS $5.85 VENDOR WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WATER AND SEWER DIVISIO" WATER C SEWER FUND PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8116190 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION PARTS $302$343.45 PAGE 23 INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL $20.10 $169.84 ***TOTAL** $3029343.45 CHICAGO E NORTHWESTERN TRANS C LAND LEASE -JULY $1 589.03 SIV589.03 COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS CLNG SERVICE 3140.00 $140.00 JACOBS AND SONS9 INC. COMPUTER PKG LOT REHAB $13.420.22 a COMPUTET PKG LOT REHAB $379059.7.1 $509479.93# PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $529208.96 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $52*208.96 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES JULY 1990 COLLECTION $138*783.42 JULY 1990 COLLECTION $129967.19 JtTLY 1990 COLLECTION $4,556.04 JULY 1990 COLLECTION $5,979.62 $160*278.27 MIO—AMERICA PACKAGING RECYCLING SUPPLIES $9s294.33 $9*294.33* SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN SOLID WASTE AGENCY s8*099.00 $8,091.00# REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $177x663.60 VILLAGE OF MUUNT PROSPECT PAGE 24 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 8116/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESLRIPIIUN INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $177x663.60 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DONOHUE E ASSOCIATEST INC. SERVICES RENDERED $39990.00 $3*940.00 01HM ELECTRONICS PARTS $50.92 ' PARTS $25.46 176.38 PROFESSIONAL TANK SERVICES• LI SERVICES RENDERED $763.65 $763.65 SAUBER MFG. CO. EQUIPMENT $573.00 $573.00 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** $59403.03 GENERAL FUND $3999 0.00 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND 3649.38 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 $763.65 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES MEYER MATERIAL CO. LIMESTONE SCREENINGS 319030.OQ $19030.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** %1*030.00 GENERAL FUND 319030.00 ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL 3I*6Z5vl4O.76 DATE RUN 8/L6/90 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 25 TIME RUN 11.42.12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING 10—APPBAR SUMMARY BY FUND 8i 16;`90 NO. FUND MANE AMOU141 I GENERAL FUND $8699089.13 22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $479355.26 23 COMMUNITY DEVL?MT BLOCK GRANT $72:881.05 24 Itt. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $619621.80 41 WATER C SEWER FUND $3909805.28 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $569461.99 48 MOTOR E{3UIPMENT POOL FUND $649.38 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND i94s487.04 51 CAPITAL IMPRV. iE REPL. FUND $49959+95 55 DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT CONST 1985 $763.65 73 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND 541440.29 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $219625.94 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 5196259140.76 General and Special Revenue Funds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund Motor Equipment Pool Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement Repl•or Repair Fund Corporate Purpose Construction 1990 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985 Debt Service Funds Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT July 1, 1990 - July 31, 1990 Fund Revenues Expenses Fund Balance for for Balance June 30 1990 ,Tule 1990 July 1990 July_ 31 1990 $ 3,128,856 $1,159,908 $1,493,071 $ 2,795,693 752,868 109,631 296,090 566,409 < 10,028> 89,000 78,710 262 < 100,433> 1,363 51,541 < 150,611> 4,041,152 332,910 489,465 3,884,597 215,958 12,960 4,595 224,323 1,170,871 185,426 147,004 1,209,293 548,385 765 45,505 503,645 266,687 4,238 32,232 238,693 120,205 1,683 1,525 120,363 793,657 5,135 172,164 626,628 14,825,178 124,647 41,049 14,908,776 16,734,656 138,004 43,150 16,829,510 261,586 884 2,167 260.303 $42,749,598 $2,166,554 52=898,268 $42,017,884 Lm E VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING T131190 1990-9t T -T -D T -T -D CUR MO ONREC-O ; BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL GENERAL FUND TAR REVENUE 1-000-00-4001 TAXES -C ORPORRTE CURRENT 19514*300 37896Z4 TwS14.S00- t.S14vS00- 100- 1-006-001001 TAKE S-CORPOR#TE PRIOR 197Z39300 4509824 129606 1.710,694- [:7109694- 99- 1-000-00-4004 TAXES -GARBAGE CURRENT 744.606 166.399 143,600- 145,600- L00- 1 -000 -Ob -4005 TAXES -GARBAGE PRIOR 9269600 23t•640 6*TTS tt99a22- 919.921- 99- 1-000-00-4010 TAXES -NO 6 BROS CURRENT /21000 39000 12.000- Iz*000- 100- 1-000-00-4011 TAXES -RD 6 BROG PRIOR tz,000 39000 101 II,S99- It*S99- 99- 1-000-00-4013 RETAILERS OCCUPATION TXX599ZS9000 1s481.Z50 1$451.267 4459751 4.4739773- 4.473,733- Th- i -000-00-4014 SALES TAX -SPECIAL PATRNT 0 1-000-00-401S FOREIGN FIRE INS TAX 0 t -000-00-40t6 AUTO RENTAL TAX 6 ,000 1.500 19853 591 4.197- 4*t3T- 69- t-000-00-4017 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 5ZS.000 I31*2s0 19.319 37079 445.622- 44S.6ZZ- as - 1 -000-00-4018 FOOO.L BEVERAGE TRV( SSO*000 13T*499 I39*S39 499[99 410.161- 410*161- 75- 1-000-00-4020 ELECTRONICS CARE TAX Iz*000 39000 12.000- 1z.000- too - 1 -000-00-4064 PERSONAL PROP REP& TAX 0 1-000-00-4065 PERSONAL PROP REPL R65 O MAL TAX REVENUE t.9S2*000 2.987.994 I*691*832 S3Z*9S6 2608166- 10*Za0.t6S- S26 - FEE REVENUE t-000-00-4101 BUILDING PERMIT FEES Z7S90DO 69,148 59.442 9eoes 21s9sSe- 215.556- TS - t -960-00-4102 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 45.000 tl$ZSO 12$866 Z*4T4 32*132- 32.132- TI - 1 -000-00-4104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES ZT*400 6$6T3 6*639 t.490 ZO.S62- 20.862- 16- 1-000-00-4tOS PLAM EXAMIMATIOM FEES 50.000 129498 [4.219 3961S 35.751- 35.161- 12- 1-000-00-4106 STREET OPENING FEES SOO 123 390 100 ISO- 150- 30- 1-000-00-4tOT VENICCE LICENSE FEES 730.000 t112.499 945413 tS.954 633.581- 63S.SaT- 87- 1-000-00-4108 DOG LICENSES 12.000 39000 831 til t1.169- 11.169- 93- 1-000-00-4109 LIQUOR LICENSES 127*500 31.815 117*S90 2.170 99910- 999t0- 8- 1-000-00-4110 BUSINESS LICENSES t609000 39.999 17.130 3*640 142*a70- 142,870- -89- 1-000-00-4112 PUBLIC IN" INSPECTIONS 65.000 16.24a 956 64.044- 64.044- 99- 1-000-00-4It3 RENTAL FEES 45.OUO i19z5O 45.000- 45.000- too - 1 -000-00-4114 FEES -BOARD OF APPEALS t5.000, 3*►5D 7.570 2.353 7*130- Te130- 48- 1-000-00-4115 :INTEL FRAMCNISE FEES 31$000 T9749 12.089 it*089 19.912- 18,912- 61- I-000-00-1116 BELL STS FRANCNISE FEES 929000 22.998 zZ*ea7 79643 69.113- 69.&13- 15- 1-000-00-4119 ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS 13.000 3.249 5.005 3.TSO 7*995- T.99S- 62- 3-000-00-4120 FALSE ALARM FEES tO.000 1.499 825 300 9.&73- 9.175- 9z- 1-000-00 -1121 CABLE TT FRXNCNISE FEES LSS.DOo 38.T46 ZS*91S 139166 129.Qe3- 129*06z- 83- 1-000-00-4123 LANOtOROJTEMANT FEES 35.000 89748 33.084 4B3 e4 94 0 TOTAL FEE REVENUE I99a6.560 412$104 43451t4 82*172 1.454.387- 19454.386- T7- INTERG09ERNflUEMTAL REVENUE t-000-00-4LSO STATE INCOME TAX L97T5*000 4439148 599.001 1T5.659 t.iT59999- t.ITS*999- 66- 1-000-00-4151 STATE SALES TAX 125.000 31.246 Z4*39S 7.706 100.605- 1009605- 80- 1-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX-SORCMG toS00.000 3TS*000 4245092 &26.490 I.OTS*908- 190 TS99OS- 72- 1-000-00-4153 STATE USE TAX 639SZ3 63.823 63.SZ3 63.523 0 1-000-00-4154 GRANT -SR. CITIZEN TAXI O 1-000-00-4155 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPO 0 1-000-00-4156 EMPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS 20$000 4$998 2.543 636 IT$451- 175 4ST- UT- I -000-00-4159 FLOOD REIMBURSEMENTS 0 1-000-00-4160 RECYCLING GRANT 25500 624 2*500 25500 0 1-000-00-4161 GRANT - POLICE N E G 109000 2.499 10.600- 109000- 100- t-600-00-4162 GRANT-ILEC POLICE TANG z0 .000 4994a 20$000- 20.000- 100- 17-000-00-4163 GRANT -STATE FIRE TAMING 17.500 4014 tt*so0- tT5S00- too- FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE TILLAGE OF 14UMNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOORTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131/90 1990-91 T -T -O T -T -O CUR No 13RREE-0 x GENERAL 'FUND BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL - BALANCE BALANCE SAL - INTERGOVERNMENTAL RETENUE t-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP MEPC TAX I3T.5OO 34.3T4 32962t 32.611 104.819- 1045619- 16- 1-000-00-4165 TOTAL PERSONAL PROP REPL RCB 3*S00 673 33t 142 2.469- 2.969- SS - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 396119000 9029136 I*I499306 4129577 Z.4619494- 2.461.494- 66 - SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 1-000-00-41TS M t S SERVICE CHARGE 2009000 499995 409000 200000 160.000- 1609000- SO- I-OMO-U -4t7T RAINT. OF STATE NtGNNATS 509000 12.498 12►266 I29Z65 3T9T32- 3T9T3Z- i5- 1 -000 -Oil -4118 FOREST RIVER RORAL Fro 149500 39624 149500- 149500- 100- 1-040-00-1150 AMBULANCE TRNT FEE 4ST000 11:230 It.4T1 1#95S5339513- 339523- T4- TIITAL SERVICE CMRRGE REVENUE 3099500 T79370 639745 360823 24SVTSS- 245TTSS- T9 - PARKING REVENUE 1-000-W -4216 FINES - LOCAL 135.000 3i9TSO 359488 109991 999012- 499012- T3- 1-000-00-42tT FINES - CIRCUIT COURT 1459000 369249 469660 139392 960140- 989t40- 65- 1-000-00-4218 FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES Soo 123 t2S ITS- 3TS- i5 - TOTAL PARKING REVENUE Z830S00 709122 629913 24.364 19T.SZT- 197.527- T0 - OTHER REVENUE 1-000-00-4Z3t SALE OF CODE BOOKS 19500 375 403 219 19097- 10097- 73- 1-000-00-4233 SALE OF REFUSE BAGS 3129500 789IZ3 219780 5910I 290.TZo- 2909120- 93- 1-000-00-4235 1-000-00-4243 RECTCCTNG INCOME SENIOR 409000 99999 139759 139759 260Z%I- 260141- 66- CENTER REVENUE 59o00 !9245 29831 29163- 2.163- 43- 1-ODO-00-4Z44 SPECIAL DETAIL REVENUE 10.000 29499 499 Z25 99501- 4.501- 95- t-000-00-4244 KEIRB-SERVICESLPROPERTV 1S90OO 39750 49465 30367 109535- t00535- To - I -000-00-4246 REINS - TOOTH COURSELING 3ST000 89746 359000- 359000- too- I-000-00-4Z4I 1-000-00-4248 POLICE C FIRE REPORTS INTEREST INCOME 129000 39000 39254 20009 8.146- 81146- 73- . 1-000-00-4Z49 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME Z909000 259000 72.498 69249 7099St 79120 ZEW620 21490+49- 2199049- 16- 1-000-00-4ZSO BANK INTEREST INCOME 30.000 T*S00 29499 1969Z 19516 179e50- 219501- 119e50- 12- 1-000-00-4151 "ROT INTEREST OISTRIBUTN 71.501- 42- t-000-00-;253 INTERtST-ESCROII fURO 90i00o ZZ.SOO IT.9S9 S0Z20 119041- 729041- 0 60- 1-000-00-4255 1-000-00-4256 FLOOD LOANS INTEREST 1690o0 3.999 49365 19864 119615- 129615- 73- 1-000-00-4262 FLOOD LOANS PRINCIPAL MAIM. OF STATE NUYS. 40.000 9.999 Z0025T 39893 I9.it3- 19.713- 44- t-OOO-00-4264 REIRB-CENTRAL ROAD 19432 700Z 7.432 T9S32 0 0 I-OOU-00-426T WOLF ROAD REIRBORSERENT 1-000-00-4268 SCHOENBECK Ito REt"BURSRT 400.000 999999 4009000- 4009000- 0 too - 1 -000-00-4269 FOREST AVE REIMBURSEMENT 1!.000 89250 210000- 2t9U00- 100- 1-000-00-4215 SNARED COST-SIOEMALK 250000 69249 t9*897 19590 39103- 59103- ZO- t-000-00-4276 SNARED COST -TREE REPLC 609000 L5.000 69024 530976- 53.976- 90- t-000-00-4277 FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM Z0T000 4.995 169180 1.140 10820- 1.810- 9- 1-000-00-4299 GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT 5 I1- 5 5 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE t94489000 361.983 2210136 109996 1TZZ69Z64- 192269264- 0 65 - TOTAL GENERAL FUND--®�- 994899500 4:8T20309 396439906 1#1599908 59845.595- IS9S459394- 167 - FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE MOTOR FUEL TAR FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2Z-000-00-4tS7 R F T ALLOCATION 19L509000 TILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 2719722 PAGE 3 618,278- 16 - ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 411000 109248 14.700 149700 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 1/31/90 26.300- 64 - ZZ -000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FUND 1990-9I T -T -O T -T -O CVM MD UNREC•D ; 0 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL' 21-000-00-4190 FLOOD CONTROL SERVCE CNG 3059000 769248 305.000- 3059000- LOO - TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 305*000 769248 3059000- 30SvOOG- LOO - TOTAL FLOUO CONTROL REVENUE FUND 3059000 769Z45 3059000- 3050000- 100 - MOTOR FUEL TAR FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 2Z-000-00-4tS7 R F T ALLOCATION 19L509000 ZBT9499 2719722 909615 678,278- 618,278- 16 - ZZ -000-00-4 N►2 4EINSURSENT ON PROJECTS 411000 109248 14.700 149700 26.300- 26.300- 64 - ZZ -000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FUND 0 Z2-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME . 199000 49749 139473 4x294 59521- S9SZ7- 19- 22-000-00-42SO BANK INTEREST INCOME 55 22 55 S5 0 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 192109000 3029496 299.450 1099631 9109050- 9109050- 75 - TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 192109000 3029496 299.950 1099631 9109050— 9109050- 75 - COMMUNITY OETLPMT BLOCK GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 23-00U-00-41SS COBG GRANT 5349TZ5 1349931 ST9000 399000 48Z*725- 482,725- 89- 23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME 50,000 129496 509000- 50,000- 100- T2TAt INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 5899725 t4 79429 ST.000 399000 532.1ZS- 5329115- 90 - TOTAL COMMUNITY OEVLP4T BLOCK GRANT 589,7ZS 1479429 579000 399000 5319725- 5329725- 90 - ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND TAR REVENUE 24-000-00-46SS TAXES - CURRENT 30)9600 16*899 3079600- 3019600- 100- 24-000-00-4056 TAXES - PRIOR 3139600 769399 Z*Z94 3119306- 3tiv306- 99- 24-000-00-4L64 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 51.500 139125 S29300- 529500- 100- TCTAL TAX REVENUE 6139700 lb89423 2.294 6719406- 6119406- 100- tNTERFUND TRANSFERS 24-000-00-4228 TRANS - GENERAL/CABLE TV 139400 3.345 21,680 L:34O I09TZO- 10,120- 80- 24-000-00-4246 INTEREST INCOME 39100 714 380 Z3 29TZO- 29720- 68 - TOTAL 14TERFUND TRANSFERS 16,500 49122 39060 1,363 139440- 139440- 6l - TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 6909200 IT29545 59354 19363 684.846- 664,846- 99 - LIBRARY FUND TAX REVENUE 39-000-00-40.3L TAXES - LIBRARY SERVICES196199700 404.673 19619:700- 196189700- 100- NATER 6 SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 41-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4L-000-00-4157 GRANT -SEWER REHAB 41-000-00-4201 RATER SALES ;t-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES- 4L-000-00-4204 "EVER SALES 41-000-00-4205 WATER 6 SEWER TAPS 4t-000-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 4I-000-00-4245 OEIMBURSEMENTS 41-000-00-4246 JANA INCOME 41-000-00-4Z47 JAMA INTEREST 41-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 4t-UDO-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS 41-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 41-000-00-4280 SALE OF PROPFRTY 41-000-00-4289 GAIN/LOSS SALE OF ASSETS 41-000-00-4Z90 GAIN ON SALE OF INVEST. 4t-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 41-000-00-4299 NATER CLEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE TOTAL WATER 6 SEWER FUND 7649800 1911199 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 7640800- 88?10D0 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 51896 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/3L/90 309000 7.500 1990-91 Y -T -O T -T -O CUR MO UNREC00 1.681.800 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BAL AITCE LIBRARY FUND 391.400 999100 359,00?T TAX REVENUE - 32.693- 395349000 893.500 39-000-Oo-4037 TARES - IMRF 218.400 54.600 218.400- 39-000-00-;038 TAXES - MAINT 6 REPAIR t40.TOO 35.175 140*T00- 39-000-00-;039 TAXES-INSORAMCE C AUDIT 299120 19278 2991ZO- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 2.006.920 SO19?26 Z.9069920 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 130364- 159000 189750 39-000-00-4151 STATE GRANT 52.280 139068 5Z.2B0- 39-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 269600 69648 Z60b00- TOTAL INTERGUVERNMENTAL REVENUE 789880 I99116 T8.880 - PARKING REVENUE 509000 129498 39-000-00-4216 FINES AMC) FORFEITS 40.000 9.999 40.000- 39-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME: 409000 9.999 40.000- 39-000-00-4254 OTHER INCOME 38[.120 95*280 381.120 - TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 4619120 tiS9276 46t.120 - TOTAL LIBRARY FUNU 295469920 636.720 29546.920 - NATER 6 SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 41-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4L-000-00-4157 GRANT -SEWER REHAB 41-000-00-4201 RATER SALES ;t-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES- 4L-000-00-4204 "EVER SALES 41-000-00-4205 WATER 6 SEWER TAPS 4t-000-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 4I-000-00-4245 OEIMBURSEMENTS 41-000-00-4246 JANA INCOME 41-000-00-4Z47 JAMA INTEREST 41-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 4t-UDO-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS 41-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 41-000-00-4280 SALE OF PROPFRTY 41-000-00-4289 GAIN/LOSS SALE OF ASSETS 41-000-00-4Z90 GAIN ON SALE OF INVEST. 4t-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 41-000-00-4299 NATER CLEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE TOTAL WATER 6 SEWER FUND 7649800 1911199 7640800- 88?10D0 22I.T48 51896 86t0104- 309000 7.500 372 19.628- 1.681.800 4209447 6,268 t96759532- 391.400 999100 359,00?T - 32.693- 395349000 893.500 8T6944Z ITS96Z5 296511558- 335.000 83.748 B10T22 251804 Z53.ZT8- 609000 159000 t2.809 40762 419191- 101000 4.996 6.636 509 130364- 159000 189750 209834 58#9t66- 159000 69149 99456 41272 159545- 1090o0 29499 79226 659 2,77-f- 509000 129498 500000- 2100000 679500 599245 209365 210.755- 30.000 ?9500 518 403 299482- 50000 1.248 1.419 Sit !0571- 59000 11248 50000- 41B1t9400 192OZ9838 10436.024 332.910 39375.377- 694930200 106239285 194429292- 3320910 S.OS0.909- PAGE 4 t BALANCE BAL Zi89400- t0o- 1400T00- too- 19012o- t0o- Z.00699ZO- LOO- 32x280- 300- 26*600- 100- 769660- too- 409000- 100- 40.000- too- 3819110- 100- 461.120- 100- - 1954609ZO- 100- 1649600- 100- 8619104- 99- 299628- 99- 1.6759532- 100- 329693- 8- 2.657.558-- 75- 1539278- 76- 479191- 79- 13.364- 67- 549t66- TL- 159544- 61- 19774- 28- 0 509000- l00- 2LO.I55- 78- 29.482- 98- 39571- TI- 59000- 100- 0 0 U 0 313T593T6- To- 500509908- 78- PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND FEE REVENUE 46-000-00-4113 RENTAL - UEPUT TOTAL FEE REVENUE PARKING REVENUE 46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION UNIT OI 46-000-00-421Z METER COLLECTION UNIT 02 46-000-00-4213 SPACE RENT WILLE ST.LOT 46-000-00-4243 PARKING STUDY REIMS 4b-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL PARKING REVENUE TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 48-000-00-4176 INSPECTION SERVICES CNGS 48-000-00-4177 HUMAN SERVICES CHARGES 48-000-00-4178 PLANNING 6 ZONING CHGS 48-000-00-4179 POLICE DEPT CHARGES 46-000-00-4180 FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES 48-000-00-4161 STREET DIVISION CHARGES 46-000-00-4182 WATER FUND CHARGES 46-000-00-4163 PARKING FUND CHARGES 48-OOU-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 48-000-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT 48-000-00-4263 SALE OF P.W. EQUIPMENT 46-000-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT T39AL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4116 '.cNER4L FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4177 WATER FUND CHARGES 49-0,00-00-4LT8 PARKING FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4179 LIBRARY FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-42411 EMPLOYEE CUMTRIBUTI04S 49-000-00-4242 RETIR:F. CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4243 LIBRARY CUNTRIBUTIONS 419-000-00-4244 FLEKCOMP CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 129000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 111000 PAGE 5 0 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 19500 39,900 19,950 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31190 37S 19500 999 1990-91 T -T -O T -T -D CVR MO UNR£C'O 619000 Z BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL 1.880 720 960 480 19920- 1.920- 67- 29880 720 960 480 L9920- 1.920- 67- 829000 20.499 170481 4.767 64.513- 6h5t3- 79- 66.000 169500 179353 5.549 48.647- 489647- 14- 99000 19250 1.550 590 79450- 79450- 83- t00- 109000 2.499 109000- 109000- 0 159000 3.750 50070 1.574 9.930- 99930- 66- 172.000 42,999 419460 129480 130.540- 1309540- 16- 1740880 43.719 429420 12.960 1329460- 132.460- 76- 129000 30000 111000 1209600 9649800- 0 10500 375 19500 39,900 19,950 0 1+0500 37S 19500 999 800 0 130.000 32.499 L309000 619000 159249 0 135.000 339150 135,000 t00- 67.000 0 190.000 47.499 1909000 509965- 76- 0 879500 219813 879500 9b.356- 969356- 0 89500 .29124 8.500 14.641 89451- 0 59000 1.248 763 765 49235- 49235- 85- 29500 624 15.000 20500- 29500- 100- 109000 2.499 64- 109000- 109000- t00- 109000 2.499 109000- 109000- 100- 593.500 1489365 5669765 T65 269735- Zb9735- 5- 59$9500 148.365 566,765 765 169735- 269735- 5- 1.2Gb9000 3019500 241.200 1209600 9649800- 9649800- 80- 1999500 49.875 39,900 19,950 1599600- 1599600- 80- 4.000 999 800 400 39200- 39200- 8G- 619000 159249 b19000- 619000- t00- 67.000 169749 169035 50429 50.965- 509965- 76- 1269500 3L96Z3 309144 99099 9b.356- 969356- 76- 309500 7.623 229049 14.641 89451- 8945i- 26- 69000 L9500 19746 584 4.254- 49254- 71- 15.000 69249 9.071 69952 L5.929- 15!929- 64- RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4Z46 tRVESTMENT INCOME 49-000-00-4249 INTEREST - GIE 49-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUND CAPITAL IMPRV. 6 REPL. FUND TAR REVENUE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/90 1990-9t T -T -D T -T -O CUR h0 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL t0090o0 14.999 179590 69987 5.500 193T4 t9t 1t - t98319000 83T9740 3189726 185.826 19831.000 4579740 3TO9726 t859426 S1 -000 -OJ -4016 TARES - CURRENT t669400 469599 51-000-00-4017 TAXES - PRIOR 2269000 569499 51-000-00-4248 IATEREST INCOME 45.000 119250 51-000-00-426Z SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT St -000-00-5263 SALE OF P.K. EQUIPMENT St -000-00-4164 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT 51-000-00-4261 DEVELOPER DONATIOM 1109000 30.000 S1-000-00-4268 HISTORICAL SOCIETY DOWN 309000 70500 TUTAL TAX REVENUE 60T.*00 LSt0848 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FOND 601.400 IS19648 CORPORATE PURPOSES CONST 1990 FEE REVENUE 53-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 53-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 49000.000, 999.999 53-000-00-4248 IMTERtST INCOME Z5.000 6.249 TOTAL FEE REVENUE 49015.000 ITOU69248 TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES CONST 1990 49CZ59000 19OG6.248 DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT CONST 1987 OTHER REVEMUE 54-000-00-4148 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN REOEVLPHT CONST 1987 DOWNTOWN REOEVLPHT CONST 1985 FEE REVENUE 1.653 149564 4.238 16.237 49238 16.237 49238 UNREC'0 BALANCE 81.4to- 59500- 191 1.452.ZT4- 19452927%- t66.400- t24.34T- 309416- 120.000- 30. 000- 541.163- 59t0163- 490009000- 25.oU0- 49OZ59000- 490259000- PAGE 6 It BALANCE SAL 62.410- 82- 5.500- Lo0- 191 0 19432.LT4- T9- t.452s2T4- T4- 186.400- too- 224.34T- 99- 309416- 68- 0 0 0 1209000- 100- 309000- t00- 59t.t63- 97- 591.163- 97- 0 49000.000- 100- 25.000- 100- 490259000- t00- 4.OZS.00o- too - 0 0 O OOWNTOMN REOEVLPMT CAST 1990 OTHER REVENUE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 56-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 190009000 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ►.0009000- 190009000- t00- 56-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME _ ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131!90 59000- 100- TUTAL OTHER REVENUE - Lv0059000 1910-91 T-T-O T-T-O CUR NO UNREC•O RE9EVLPMT CONST 1990 190059000 25tv247 190059000- BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL 53-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 139500 3e3TS 3.000 ISO t0.500- t0V500- 78- 55-000-00-4246 INTERrST INCOME 1.500 19875 3v3ta 931 4.182- 4.182- 56- 55-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 35 2 35 35 0 TOTAL FEE REVENUE 2t.O00 59250 69353 19683 14.647- 14.647- 70- TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 219000 S92S0 6.353 19683 149647- 149647- To- OOWNTOMN REOEVLPMT CAST 1990 OTHER REVENUE 56-000-00-4242 SALE OF BONDS 190009000 249.999 ►.0009000- 190009000- t00- 56-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME _ 59000 19248 5.000- 59000- 100- TUTAL OTHER REVENUE - Lv0059000 2519247 19005.000- tv005v000- LOU - TOTAL DOWNTOWN RE9EVLPMT CONST 1990 190059000 25tv247 190059000- 1.0059000- 100 - CORPORATE PURPOSES B E 11973 TAX REVENUE 60-O00-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 749700 189675 74.700- 749700- IOU - 60 -000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 919400 229848 666 909732- 909732- 99- 60-000-00-4164 PERSOIAL PROP REPL TAX 5.300 19323 5.300- 59300- l00- 60 -000 -OJ -4248 INTEREST INCOME 109550 29637 1.669 B25 79881- ?vast- 75 - TOTAL TAX REVEVUE tat.950 45,483 39337 825 1789613- t78v6t3- 98 - TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E I t973 1819950 45,483 39337 825 1789613- 1789613- 98 - CORPORATE PURPOSES B E 11974 TAX REVENUE 61-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 118.500 299625 1189500- 11R.S00- t00- 61-000-00-4023 TAXES - PRIOR 122.SSO ' 30.636 897 1219653- t11.653- 99- 6t-OU0-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPT TAX 8.400 29100 89400- 8.400- t00- 61 -000 -OU -4248 INTEREST INCOME 209000 4.998 49532 19379 159468- 159468- 7T - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 2699450 67.359 59429 t.379 2649021- 2649021- 98 - TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E 1 1974 269.450 67.359 5.429 Lv379 2649021- 2649011- 98 - SSA Ot PROSPECT MEADOWS B E I TAX REVENUE 62-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 11.700 2.925 119700- 119700- t00- 62-000-00-4026 TAXES - PRIOR It9800 2.949 IS 11.785- 119785- too - 62 -000-00-4248 IyTEREST INCOME 59000 750 830 237 2.162- 2.162- 12- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENOIN;: T131t90 1990-9t V -T -O Y -T -O CUR NO UNREC-0 % ' BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE HAL TrITAL TAX REVENUE 2095DO 69624 853 237 25,647- 25.64T- 97 - TOTAL SSR Ot PROSPECT MEADOWS H f I 26.500 69624 853 237 259647- 25.647- 97 - SSA 02 BLACKMAWK B 6 I Tax REVENUE 63-000-00-4028 TAXES - CURRENT L5.000 39750 159000- 159000- 100- 63-000-00-4029 TAXES - PRIOR 149500 3.624 21 14.479- t4.479- !00- 63-000-00-4218 INTEREST INCOME 3.20¢ 798 935 306 2.265- 2.265- 71- TUTAL TAX REVENUE 329700 •5.172 956 306 3t.744- 31*T44- 97 - TOTAL SSA 02 BLACKMAWK 6 E I 329700 B*t72 956 306 319744- 31.744- 9T - CORPORATE PURPOSES B 6 11990 INTERFUNO TRANSFERS 64-000-00-42ZT TRANS - FLOOD CONTROL 305.000, 769248 305.000- 305.000- l0U- 64-000-00-4228 TRANS - t989 IMPRV 0 64-000-00-4148 INTEREST INCOME 20.000 49998 20.000- 209000- t00 - TOTAL INTERFUNU TRANSFERS 32i.000 St.246 325.000- 3259000- LUO- TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B 6 I 1990 3259000 819246 325*000- 325*000- t00- O M74TOWN REDEVLPMT 8 6 1 1990 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 65-000-00-4227 TRANS - GENERAL FUND - 0 6S-000-00-4228 TRANS - 0/T CONST 1990 489500 12.123 48.500- 48*500- lU0- TOTAL INTERFUNO TRANSFERS 489500 129123 48*500- 48*500- LOO - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPhT B L I 1990 48.500 12*t23 4f+,S00- 489500- 100 - INSURANCE RESERVE 8 6 I TAX REVENUE 66-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 0 66-000-00-4020 TAKES - PRIOR 59.900 14.9T3 438 59*462- 59.462- 99- 66-000-00-44248 iNTERtST INCOME 79600 L*899 2►22T 522 5*373- 59373- 7t - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 679500 169872 29665 522 64,835- 64*835- 96 - TOTAL INSURANCE RESERVE 3 C 1 67.500 16*19TZ 2,665 522 64*835- 649835- 96- DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT 8 6 1 19070 TAX REVENUE 66-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 66-000-00-4039. SALES TAX INCREMENT TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS 68-000-00-4224 TRANS - O/T CONST 1985 66-000-00-4Z48 INTERtST INCOME 66-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL OUMNTOMN REDEVLPMT 8 6 119670 P M FACILITY 8 9 1 19878 TAX REVENUE 69-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 69-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS ' 69-000-00-4221 TRANS - CIRR FUND 69-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 69-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL P N FACILITY 5 E 119878 DOWNTOWN R.EOEVIPMT 8 E 1198TC INTERFUND TRANSFERS. 70-000-00-4224 TRANS - DIT CONST 1967 70-000-00-4225 TRANS - 01T CONST 1985 70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 70-000-00-4249 L7TNER INCOME TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT B L I 198TC POLICE PENSION FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131190 1990-91 T -T -O T -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 90,000 229500 909000 229500 2-9000 60000 569936 375 93 149375 69093 56.936 1149375 28093 569936 1759900 439974 1789750 449685 1.308 354.650 8896S9 1.308 179500 h 374 69411 19743 179500 4.374 6.411 1.743 3729150 93,033 7.719 1.743 29,500 1.374 149593 2Q95OO 79374 149593 Z90500 793T4 14.593 UNREC'0 BALANCE 90.000- 90.000- 32.936 375- 3Z,561 51, 439- ITS.900- 177,442- 3539342- 119089- 11.089- 36v943t- 29.500- 149593 149907- 14.907 - PAGE 9 S BALANCE SAL = 90.000- 100- 0 909000- too - $2,936 137 375- 100- 0 32.561 134 ST9439- SU- 1759900- 100- ITTs442- 99- 3539342- L00- 0 11.089- 63- 0 Lt9089- 63- 364943'1- 96- 299500- 100- 14093 0 0 0 1499OT- 51- 149907- S1 - TAX REVENUE 71-000-00-4049 TAXES - CURRENT 1009000 24.999 _ t009000- 100,000- too - TI -000 -OG -1#050 TAXES - PRIOR 2v000 498 413 t,587- l9S"r- 79- 11-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 0 71-UOO-00-4243 PULICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS 24G9000 60,000 63.921 189673 1711.079- 1769079- 73- POLICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/32/90 1990-91 T -T -O T -T -O CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL T1-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1.305.000 71-000-00-4249 OTHER 71-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 5.000 IL -000-00-4290 GAIN ON SOLE OF INVESTNT TOTAL TAX REVENUE 19652.000 TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND 1.652.000 -------- FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE T2-000-00-4052 TAXES - CURRENT 50.000 7t=000-00-4053 TAXES -PRIOR t900O T2-000-00-4243 FIREMEN'S CONTRIBUTIONS 2329000 72-OOU-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 194659000 72-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME 19552 72-000-00-425J BANK INTEREST INCOME 59000 ?2-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF 1NVESTNT 118.787 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1.t1T.?95- t9T559000 TOTAL FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND L9153000O SSA 63 BUSSE- M LLE 8 E I TAX REVENUE 88-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 68-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 88-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA 03 BUSSE=MILLE 8 E I SSA 04 BUSSE-WILLS 8 E I TAR REVENUE 89-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 84000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 89-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA 04 BUSSE-MILLE 8 E I PAGE t0 UNREC•D % BALANCE BALANCE SAL 326.250 308.970 1049422 996.030- 996.030- 76- 249 201 ZO 793- 793- 0 t9248 2.841 19552 2.159- 29t59- 43- 366.249 347.205 118.787 19117.T95- 1.t1T.?95- 0 4229995 376.145 124.64? 1.215.855- 1.215.855- 1? - 412.995 316.145 124.647 19273.855- 19275.855- 1T- 12.498 50.000- 509000- 100- 249 201 ZO 793- 793- 79- 57.999 62.134 1T*852 169.866-• t699866- 13- 366.249 347.205 118.787 19117.T95- 1.t1T.?95- 76- 0 1.248 29T41 1.365 29259- 2.259- 45- 0 438.243 4120287 1389004 1.340.713- 193409713- 76- 438.243 4129287 1389004 193409113- 193409713- 76- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZO T ZO t0 C 20 7 20 20 0 20 7 10 20 0 SSA 06 GEORGE/ALBERT B C 1 TAX REVENUE 94-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 94-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 94-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 94-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA 06 GEORGE/ALBERT e 6 I FLOOD LOAN 8 C i INTEAFUNO TRANSFERS 95 -UCO -00-4227 TRANSFER GENERAL FUND TITAL INTERFU40 TRANSFERS TOTAL FLOOD LOAN 8 S I TOTAL ALL FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE tt ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/3L/90 1990-91 V -T -O T -T -D CUR MO UNREC-O z BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL SALANCF BALANCE BAL L69200 49050 16.200- L6*200- t00- 160000 39999 tit 1S.d58- 159858- 99- 800 198 420 tI6 380- 380- 48- 0 339000 81247 362 116 320#38- 329138- 96- 33.000 8.247 562 116 329438- 329438- 98- 0 0 0 34.487050 70340*503 106- lt.12t.BL3 I.i15.6TO 2791479447- 379147.445- 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131/90 1990-91 V -T -D Y -T -O C`UR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION UNENCUM % ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT BALANCE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1686430 429099 TOTAL CONTRACTOAL SERVICES TUTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 179500 4.374 46SOO t9SOt TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 39#000 4,147 236313 3#029 TOTAL COMMODITIES 49000 999 618 216 TOTAL MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 600500 IS9t2D 286431 4048 ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS I193T3 It06454 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 479020 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 29500 624 184 109 TOTAL COMlRTOITI£S Z50 60 61 61, TOTAL ADVISORY 30AROS AND COMMISSt Z,7SO 684 245 170 TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION 636250 15.804 28,676 49918 VILLAGE MANAGER`S OFFICE UNENCUM % ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT BALANCE SAL- TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1686430 429099 TOTAL CONTRACTOAL SERVICES 219030 4,251 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,800 4S0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,000 249 TOTAL ADMIMISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1889280 47.055 LEGAL SERVICES 189 7b TOTAL COMTRACTOAC SERVICES 1409000 349998 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES t4O9000 349998 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT L TRAINING I193T3 It06454 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 479020 L19T54 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33.300 89313 TOTAL COMMODITIES 950 234 TOTAL PERS7NNEL MANAGEMENT L TRAIN 8t.270 Z09301. SALARY ADMINISTRATION 34 699 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 109000 29499 TOTAL SALARY ADMINISTRATION 109000 2,499 TOTAL VILLAGE MA44GER-S OFFICE 4199550 104#853 CABLE TV OPERATIONS 10.000 100 CABLE TV OPERATIONS I0,000 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 83,4Z0 209850 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ZT92L0 69795 TOTAL COMMODITIES It9440 26859 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9,500' 29373 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 139400 39348 TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS 1449970 369225 TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS 1449970 369225 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 99500 t00 PAGE 12 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL- 13.001 13.000 14 15#687 LS,687 40 3,383 39382 85 329071 329069 53 29 3l6 29 316 93 t89 189 7b 2,505 29505 9t 34#376 349574 $5 38.124 119940 130,306 130.306 if 39720 11714 13,331 139330 78 531 465 19169 19169 65 16000 1,000 100 429475 14#t19 145.806 t459805 TT 29.346 119313 t10.4S4 1106454 79 29,546 I193T3 It06454 1109454 79 79452 39388 3916366 39,566 84 69865 2,55t 269435 269435 .79 251 34 699 699 14 149568 599 T3 66,702 669702 82 109000 10.000 100 I0,000 109000 t00 86,569 319465 3329962 332996t 79 t9,304 59572 6h 116 649116 T7 14.820 S9I14 12939Z t t29389 46 1,120 19048 109320 t0.320 90 96500 99500 t00 29680 t#340 10,720 10.720 80 37#924 139074 107,048 1 1079045 14 379924 L31 -O74 1079048 1 1079045 14 PAGE 13 UMEXPEROEO UNENCUR ; BXCRNCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 559035 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT 559164 LO ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 EMOING T/3t/90 5,474 1990-91 t—f—O T—T—O COR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 8t S60154 569584 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 39012 39012 65 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 72,920 189225 17.685 5.651 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 649800 169t4O 99436 49521 TOTAL_ COMMODITIES 69500 19623 t9026 ZZO TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 29000 498 19900 _ LOO TOTAL ADMI3ESTRATION ANO SUPPORT ,469020 369486 Z8,34T 10,396 ACCOUNTING 53,552 73 149834 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 80,725= 209[73 Z4914L 69935 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,550 885 538 261 TOTAL COMMODITIES 750 166 56 56 TOTAL ACCOUNTING 859025 2t,246 149735 79258 PURCHASING 72 S9264 1 59263 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2t9600 59448 5918'1 t96ts TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600 ISO 72 38,057 TOTAL COMMODITIES 19900 474 19500 TUTAL PURCHASING 219300 69072 so78S 19615 ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING Z29036 229036 13 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 739050 1SoZ55 199498 69047 TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL SERVICES 199400 49848 49566 19592 TOTAL COMMODITIES 69000 19500 19013 1,006 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.500 lolls 79490 94 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE L049125 18 199226 TOTAL ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING 102,950 259128 Z5913? 89645 DUPLICATING SERVICES at TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 259000 69249 69984 29[lt TOTAL COMMODITIES 79500 tools 29236 29236 TOTAL DUPLICATING SERVICES 329SOO 80124 99220 49341 TELEPHONE SERVICE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Z0.62S 59154 59721 19459 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 479500 11.674 99443 39346 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 19500 315 TUTAL TELEPHONE SEPVICE 699625 179403 159164 49805 INSURANCE TUTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 30 9t3s 19s30 89099 29327 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 4659000 1169241 939000 469500 TOTAL INSURANCE 49S913S ►239777 101.099 489827 CUSTOMER SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 939060 23.266 259700 7.363 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 329500 89124 Z9623 19243 TOTAL COMMODITIES 69000' 19995 5LO TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICES 1339560 33937S 28,635 89606 CASH MANAGEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES [3.6t0 59898 44384 19260 TOTAL CASM MANAGEMENT 23.610 59696 4.384 19260 PAGE 13 UMEXPEROEO UNENCUR ; BXCRNCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL 5590" 559035 TS 559164 LO 559154 85 5,474 59574 84 21000 29000 l00 1179673 10 ItT9663 8t S60154 569584 TO 39012 39012 65 694 694 93 60.290 609290 'It 169015 169015 73 600 600 t00 19900 19900 _ LOO t695I5 189515 76 53913S2 53,552 73 149834 14,834 76 49927 49927 62 49500 49500 LOU 0 T79SL3 7798t3 T6 t8s016 189016 72 S9264 1 59263 TO 239280 1 239279 TZ 149904 149904 72 38,057 369051 80 19500 19500 100 54946t S4,461 T8 Z29036 229036 13 3729000 3729000 80 394,036 394.036 80 6T.361 679360 T2 19,815 290875 92 1.491 79490 94 104,727 L049125 18 199226 199226 81 19,226 199226 at PAGE 14 ONEXPENDED UNENCUM It BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE IAL 500 TILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT 0 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131190 ' t990 -9I T -T -D Y -f -D CUR MO T8 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 229340 69 2.174 NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES 29LT2 43 70.222 Z TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES SOO t23 39.tOZ TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE ts866 19866 ?5 TOTAL NOR-OEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE SOD 1.23 85 111.190 TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT l.LL3922i ZT89232 2429T06 959761 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE 78 1.356.491 46 19356.444 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 193569491 46 193569444 ?6 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 5L9445 15.354 150737 49563 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 329250 -89055 99910 29262 TOTAL COMMODITIES 59000 t.248 Z9626 19876 TOTAL ADMIVISTRATtoll AND SUPPURT 98,695 24*657 289473 89701 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 116.046 74 41.683 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 459500 1193T3 69398 TOTAL COMMODITIES 29500 624 634 39'388 TOTAL VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 489000 119997 7.032 T1 TOTAL VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE 1469695 36.654 359505 89TOt RISK MANAGEMENT 340060 74 1109260 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM T4 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES t.74tv0U0 4359240 3649510 1479004 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 197419000 4359240 364.510 1479004 TOTAL RISK MAMRGEMENT 1:7419000 435.240 3849510 14t9004 INSPECTION SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3619390 909333 959123 27.823 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Tb.00D 189984 179465 5.614 TOTAL COMMODITIES 89300 2.061 865 300 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 500 123 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES _ 446.190 Lit:507 IL3.473 33.731 ENGINEERING SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2939600 73.389 779554 239470 TOTAL CUNTRACTUAL SERVICES 719900 LT.96t 30921? 209660 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6*500 19bZ3 484 93 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 49000 999 112 112 TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 375,000 93.912 108.367 44.335 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 622.190 2059419 221.640 i690T2 POLICE DEPARTMENT AOMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 4609755 1L591T0 1209195 33,729 TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL SERVICES t48.950 3TeZZT 369690 129892 PAGE 14 ONEXPENDED UNENCUM It BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE IAL 500 S00 t00 0 SOO S00 100 810.52t 11 QTOe508 T8 45.T08 459708 14 229340 229340 69 2.174 2 29LT2 43 70.222 Z 70.220 T1 399102 39.tOZ 66 ts866 19866 ?5 40.968 409968 85 111.190 2 tIL9188 76 t9356.491 46 1056.444 78 1.356.491 46 19356.444 78 193569491 46 193569444 ?6 266.267 2669261 74 55,518 6 589509 77 79435 T.435 90 500 SUO t00 132.720 6 3329711 TS Zt69G46 116.046 74 41.683 419683 58 69016 69016 93 3.886 39'388 97 267,633 261.633 T1 600.351 6 6009344 73 3%0.560 340060 74 1109260 tI09260 T4 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15 8UOGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/90 1970-91 T -T -D T -T -O CDR MO ONEXPENGEO UNENCUM t BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAt ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL COMMODITIES 109250 2.562 956 L56 91294 2 99Z92 91 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 49000 999 85 85 i*915 3.915 98 TOTAL AOMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 62399SS 1S5P958 1599926 46.864 464,029 2 464.027 T4 PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2.5659355 6419322 67I9t22 1949616 1.8949233 1.8949233 T4 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2749590 689643 1089218 209300 166,372 1b6.3T2 61 TOTAL COMMODITIES 299250 79305 29436 520 26.814 269814 92 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES S.000 1.248 59000 39 4.961 99 TOTAL PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEME29874919S ?149518 7819776 2151436 296920419 39 2.0929380 73 CRIME PREV., PUBLIC AND YOUTH SERV. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1159290 28.815 319?6I 8.361 839529 839529 7Z TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES L49500 3.621 2.193 1.158 12.301 129307 65 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3.600 897 513 151 39088 3.08? 66 TOTAL CRIME PREV.9 PDBCIC AND TOUT 1339390 33.333 34.467 99670 98.924 989923 14 INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PROGRAM TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 533.5SS 1339371 146.661 419534 386.894 386.694 73 TOTAL CORTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.200 L0.548 79999 39100 34.201 34.201 6t TOTAL COMMODITIES 29000 498 489 233 1.511 l.5Li 76 TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE P S?T.?55 144.417 tS59t49 45.467 422.606 4229606 73 CROSSING GUARDS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 469000 12.000 9.308 389692 389692 8L TOTAL COMMODITIES SOO 123 SOO 500 t00 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS 489S00 129123 9.308 399192 399192 81 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE L OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 52.670 .139112 IO.SSO 39033 42.320 429320 d0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1999250 499806 t529264 69591 - 46.967 3 46.963_ 24 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1249000 10.996 27020 LZ9033 96.280 969280 78 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 131200 39294 6.170 7,030 79030 53 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE t OPER 389,320 97.308 196.724 2396ST 192.597 3 1929593 49 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 4. MT911S 191619657 1933793SO 341.094 31309.767 44 393099TZI Tl FIRE F EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADMINISTRATION AND SOPPURI TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2849025 709992 64.381 19024 119.636 219.638 1T TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 499450 12,331 8.306 3093 41.144 1 41.143 83 TOTAL COMMODITIES 32.800 8,199 573 93 32.2[7 1 32.226 98 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 159290 3.822 39488 2.186 L1.802 119802 17 TOTAL ADMtNISTRATIUM AND SUPPORT 3B19565 959364 76,754 25,196 304.811 2 304.809 BO FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Z.765.L3S 691.266 732.993 2139760 2V0329t43 290329142 73 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 233931#0 58.329 47.628 229947 185.Tt2 49 t8S9663 d0 TOTAL COMMODITIES It.760 2,934 19215 666 101545 100545 90 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 849370 119081 4.484 39506 ?9.886 26 79.658 95 TOTAL FIRE UEPARTMENT OPFRATIUNS $9094.605 7719610 786.320 2401481 29305.186 11 20089209 IS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -D T -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 226.404 UNENCUM t TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES FIRE PREVENTION 15.558 I69555 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES.. IS6*630 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 229*405 579336 65.197 18:495 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37.600 9*393 5.872 3.674 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5.715 I94I9 2.102 1.338 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Z,lts 525 923 481 TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION 1749835 68.673 T4,094 23.988 COMMUNICATIONS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,560 855 26 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 369000 8.991 8.960 4.389 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9*825 2.454 Zil 14,915 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 45,825 11.451 9,231 4*389 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE C OPERATIONS 226.404 UNENCUM t TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 62.240 15.558 I69555 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES.. IS6*630 399156 136.381 TOTAL COMMODITIES 49.000 11.496 9.141 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 7.270 1.815 740 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1O9b55 t9192 56 TOTAL EgJIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPER 271,140 68,015 162.823 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 615 ZT*040 75 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3.000 750 BOB TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3,560 855 26 TOTAL COMMOOITIE4 910 225 1st TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 7.505 1.872 49012 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 14,915 3.132 5,097 TOTAL FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 4.083.945 3 19020,855 1.1149319 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE 0 POLICE C FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES 4 109,313 40 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3399600 84,900 1139196 TOTAL POLICE E FIRE OISPA,TCM SERVI 33y*600 84,900 113.196 TOTAL CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ---- 339,600 54,900 1139196 WMAN SERVICES OIVISI014 I 3,492 41 INFORMATION. REFERRAL, E COUNSELING I 9,877 b6 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 97.480 24►360 ZS,850 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30*TTO 70666 T.O81 TOTAL COMMODITIES 4.550 19134 56 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES i. 500 375 t.013 TOTAL INFOAMATION9 REFERRAL, E COU 134►300 339555 34.041 RECREATION AND EDUCATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 14.7ZO 3,615 3.963 TOTAL COMTRACTUAL SERVICES 2*315 576 I9TOU TOTAL RECREATIOM AND EDUCATION 119035 4.151 5*663 NONEBOUNO SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 509725 12.675 13.738 4.713 665 4.195 223 4.796 231 9 16 1.954 2.220 3069460 PAGE 16 UNEXPENOED 226.404 UNENCUM t BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 164.209 79656 1649208 T2 31.728 23.688 3ts718 84 3.613 49494 3.613 63 I.t92 1O9b55 t9192 56 200.741 10,757 200.741 13 279040 615 ZT*040 75 9.554 3.956 9,554 97 '34,594 3b,594 8G 45.685 45,685 13 ZO*243 t 20*242 13 36.859 36.659 80 6.530 3 6.527 90 0 109,317 4 109,313 40 29192 2.192 T3 3.534 39534 99 659 659 T2 3.493 I 3,492 41 9,ST8 I 9,877 b6 2,9699628 84 29969,542 289299 226.404 226.404 28.299 1269404 2269404 28.299 226*404 216*404 79656 719630 7t9630 2,168 23.688 239688 18 4,494 49494 t,Ot3 488 447 1O9b55 100.300 100.299 19138 10,757 109751 162 615 615 t,300 it*372 11931Z 3.956 36,987 369987 73 67 67 67 13 77 99 32 75 73 27 67 73 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31/90 1990-91 7 -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO UNEXPENOED UNENCUM % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBER£O BALANCE UAL HUMAN SERVICES DIY[StON - MONEBOUMD SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES L59150 39786 29746 19047 129404 129404 82 TOTAL HOMEBOUND SERVICES 65.875 160#61 16.484 5.003 49.391 49.391 75 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 38.355 99582 9.272 39108 291083 29.083 76 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1.650 408 307 154 1.343 19343 81 TOTAL COMMYNITY ACTIVITIES 429045 9.990 9.379 3.262 30.426 309426 76 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 29805 699 701 234 2.104 Z9104 75 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL COtN0400IVIES t9450 360 44- 72 1.494 19494 t03 TOTAL BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 4.255 1:059 657 306 3.599 39598 85 SOCIAL AGENCIES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 209500 S.IZ4 49500 37S 169000 160 IS9840 17 TOTAL SOCIAL AGLNCIES 209500 59124 49500 3T5 Ib.DOO lb0 159840 77 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 2619910 709440 70,564 Zt9101 Zt1.O8T 160 2109926 75 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 13193IO 329820 359011 119342 969300 96.299 13 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25.250 6.306 59810 1,914 199440 19.440 77 TOTAL COMMODITIES 59050 L.257 19037 116 49013 49013 79 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES t90D0 249 19000 19000 100 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING t629610 409632 41.856 139472 (209753 1209752 .74 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 519165 12.783 10.010 3911.9 419135 419155 Be TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15t3SO' 3.834 59991 59466 99359 99359 61 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ZU.000 49998 209000 209000 100 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 869515 ZL961S 169001 8085 TU9514 70,514 %1 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 13.800 3.447 5.644 19631 8.156 89156 59 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL OOWNTUWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF 139800 39447 59644 19631 B9t56 8.156 59 CUBG ADMINISTRATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 299500 T9395 89564 29525 219036 219036 71 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11.615 2.898 29015 462 9.610 996t0 83 TOTAL CU14HOUITIES 950 234 950 950 t00 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 750 196 750 750 100 TUTAL CUBG AOMINISTRATION 429925 I09713 10.579 29987 329346 329346 75 COBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES bt.900 15.471 79105 59580 549795 549795 89 TOTAL CO3G COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 619900 159471 79105 59580 54.795 54.795 89 PAGE 18 DNEXPtNDEO UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 246.252 1.704 245,548 79 248.252 29T04 Z451548 19 2.840 2,840 84 81.641 81.640 82 84.48t 841480 82 6.921 69921 92 5.000 5.000 100 19,665 199665 98 3t,586 319586 97 95- 95- 0 31,684 31.684 79 31.589 319589 i4 63- 63- 0 0 0 63- 63- 0 b8Z,4U9 Z.T04 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 155.419 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT 75 849694 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7/31190 BL 1990-91 T -T -D T -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PLANNING AND CONING DEPARTMENT 249,579 T6 151.849 COBG ACCESSIBILITY 6 NEIGHBORHOOD tRPRVM 76 ?2,639 729639 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 309,000 779247 60,748 609616 TOTAL CD3G ACCESSIBILITY 6 MEIGMBO 309.000 77.247 60,748 60,616 CO@G RESIOEMTIAL REHABILITATION 0 3269774 122 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,400 849 560 l55 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 100,000 24.999 16.360 689 TOTAL CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITAT 1039400 25.848 18,910 844 CDBG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION 39618 86 106,573 16 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 7.500 1.BTS 519 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5.000 1.Z48 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENUITURES 209000 4.996 335 335 TOTAL CDBG COMMERCIAL REHAStLITATI 329500 99121 914 335 COBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 95 L9 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 409000 9,999 89316 99316 TOTAL CDBG MULTI -FAMILY REMASK ITA W.000 9.999 8.411 8,335 CD3G DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 63 13 TOTAL CONiRACTUAL.SERVICES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL COBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 63 13 TOTAL PLANNING ANU ZONING DEPARTMENT 852.650 213.093 tTO9243 1029398 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSUMAL SERVICES _ 206,585 519630 51.166 149648 TOTAL C09TRALFUAL SERVICES 104,500 16,tt8 19,606 9,760 TOTAL CUMM901TIES 14,000 39498 4,534 754 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITUkES 29500 624 29500 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 3Z7,505 819870 789006 2S,t62 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2009920 50,L99 489972 13087 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SCRVICES 87,500 21,861 14,86t 13,121 TOTAL COMMODITIES 869300 219564 23.514 139606 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 399500 99870 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC I+UILOI 4149120 103.500 8T.347 409714 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1169455 319611 46.795 159641 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2i95O0 6,873 9.678 3,578 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6,950 19731 19293 211 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 49200 1,047 566 489 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS tb7.i0S 41,2b2 58.532 1997t9 PAGE 18 DNEXPtNDEO UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 246.252 1.704 245,548 79 248.252 29T04 Z451548 19 2.840 2,840 84 81.641 81.640 82 84.48t 841480 82 6.921 69921 92 5.000 5.000 100 19,665 199665 98 3t,586 319586 97 95- 95- 0 31,684 31.684 79 31.589 319589 i4 63- 63- 0 0 0 63- 63- 0 b8Z,4U9 Z.T04 6T9,TO3 80 155.419 155,419 75 849694 849694 BL 9,466 99466 68 0 2{y,'J79 249,579 T6 151.849 1519848 76 ?2,639 729639 83 6Z9T86 40 62.146 F3 39.500 82 39,4t@ 100 0 3269774 122 326*651 19 79.660 79,6b0 63 179622 17,622 64 5,657 59657 8l 3,634 L6 39618 86 106,573 16 1069557 65 PAGE 19 UNEXPENDED VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BALANCE ENCOMBERED BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT HAL 57,701 ACCOOMTtNG PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131/90 65 1990-91 Y -T -O T -T -O COR MO 299233 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL STREET DIVISION L1604,536 80 19750,032 7,839 STREET MAINTENANCE T8 BT96ZO 67*628 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 8:.323 Z29074 30.625 119763 TOTAL CONT4ACTUAL SERVICES 1t8*300 299S71 67.163 619ZS9 TOTAL COMMODITIES 369600 99144 TV367 19776 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES t*9939250 498:306 381V291 3159951 TOTAL STREET MAINTENANCE 292369475 5599095 486*446 3909749 SNOW REMOVAL 149300 L00 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 94,710 Z3,9ZZ 89082 1,523 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 79000• t9746 339179 TOTAL COMMODITIES 859000 21*Z46 540 540 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOtTURES 209000 .49998 45 104.456 TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL 2071t710 519912 $9622 29063 LEAF REMOVAL 73 2219259 1*037 Z20VZZZ TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TI.840 ITV998 29268 826 TOTAL COITRACTUAL SERVICES 209000 49998 89057 89000 TOTAL COMMODITIES 149300 3e5T0 z0vit7 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES S8 19x998 20 19.978 TOTAL LEAF REMOVAL tDu9140 269526 10*325 89826 STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENANCE 20 48,045 68 20.588 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 47,050 It*760 13.878 4,100 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 93985.0 239451 28*i52 289477 TOTAL COMMODITIES Li9850 39459 7,671 69303 TOTAL STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTE 154.750 389616 50.294 399480 FORESTRY 9VZ99 83 21.800 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1999760 499932 53955S 15*327 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2269250 56*553 4.991 39939 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8,600 29145 3*950 111 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENUITURES TOTAL FORESTRY 04*610 1089630 62.096 19.583 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 44,970 119241 189754 59720 TOTAL COMMOOIFIES 239700 59919 39702 2*Z10 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 29000 498 149 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 709670 17.658 22.605 T9930 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 369385 99090 15,791 4*980 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 109000 29499 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9*300 2.325 t9tT7 984 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 12.500 3*123 488 TOTAL PUBLIC GROUNDS 8EAUTIFICATtO 68,185 170037 179462 59964 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 11*165 29790 1V866 366 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21.800 5944S TOTAL COMMODITIES 2039000 6.993 2*ZT6 750 TOTAL MAINTENAYCE OF STATE HIGHWAY 60*965 159228 47142 1.136 PAGE 19 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM i BALANCE ENCOMBERED BALANCE HAL 57,701 579700 65 $1.138 378 S09159 43 299233 38 29,195 80 19611.960 7,423 L1604,536 80 19750,032 7,839 L9742*190 T8 BT96ZO 67*628 92 79000 7*000 t00 84.460 849460 99 209000 209000 t00 199,088 1999088 96 69,573 699572 91 1tV944 Ito 119833 59 14,300 149300 L00 0 95*BL7 I10 95VT05 90 33,179 339179 71 639098 516 64,582 69 6,t79 6.179 45 104.456 St6 103,946 67 146V20S 146*205 73 2219259 1*037 Z20VZZZ 97 59050 IO 59040 59 O 372014 I0047 3719467 8S z0vit7 269216 S8 19x998 20 19.978 84 1,851 1,851 93 489066 20 48,045 68 20.588 209586 57 10,000 109000 100 89L23 1 89121 87 129012 12.011 96 SU*723 1 509712 74 9,299 9VZ99 83 21.800 100 2t*TOO 100 259724 25.TZ4 92 56.823 100 56*723 93 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131190 1990-91 V -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL STREET DIVISION SEVER OIVISION 169416 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Z3t+585 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1139905 28.467 299637 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.000 48*747 190.111 TOTAL COMMODITIES L309500 32,619 31.651 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 49500 1.t22 192.499 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 443#90S 1109955 251.399 POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE L39500 TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES h#835 ►•704 19679 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5#500 1.371 892 TOTAL COMMODITIES IZ9000 2.997 29466 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES t9500 3TS CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 25.835 6#447 5.037 TRAFFIC SIGNALS E STREET LIGHTING TUTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 16►#535 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 69115 t.52T 224 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 246.000 619497 ►5.949 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6#000 19500 823 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 185.000 46.245 426.tl9 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS E STREET LIG 443.11S 1109169 16.996 TOTAL STREET, DIVISION S.IS99LTO 1#289.565 I.1599309 NATER AND SEVER OIVISION 169416 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 74 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Z3t+585 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6679600 TOTAL COMMOOtTIES 25#500 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.500 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 590.530 TOTAL AOMINISTRATIUN AND SUPPORT 195179715 MAINTENANCE Of PUBLIC BUILDINGS 192.499 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES i3#@t0 ' TOTAL CONTRACTUAL StRVICES L39500 TOTAL COMMODITIES 14:500 TOTAL CAPITAL EXP=_NOITURES 2.500 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILOI 74#310 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 19 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 36.135 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5.400 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3#100 TOTAL MAINTENANLE OF GRUU30S 45#235 WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE E REPAIR 12.946 TUTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 16►#535 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1049000 TOTAL C04MODITIES 20.500 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 86 TOTAL NATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE E R 281#035 PAGE 20 UMEXPENOEO UNENCUM It BALANCE EWCUMBERFO HALANCE 9AL 10908T 849268 169416 849268 74 111 4.889 166#881 4#889 3 t4923S 98.849 T 98#842 T6 7.597 4.500 17.901 4.500 100 24#433 t92.5U6 T 192.499 43 464 5.156 64 5.156 75 892 4.b08 41 49567 83 19178 9.534 2 99532 19 192tt#930 1.500 10.950 1.500 t00 Z#634 20.798 43 20.755 80 654 5.891 12.946 59891 96 13.601 130.G51 1.422 130.051 94 552 5.177 3Z 5#145 86 185.000 L85.000 too 149353 426.tl9 32 4269087 96 b02#946 _ 3.999.468 99033 399909008 77 579879 57.712 169416 173.873 1739873 75 166#881 1429095 579902 525.505 4 52%#501 T9 6.369 7.597 1.673 17.901 179903 TO 624 900 1#600 1.600 64 1479624 970471 499344 493.055 493.053 83 379.317 305.781 125.337 1.2tt.936 4 192tt#930 80 10.950 9.252 Z9763 34.558 349558 79 3.369 654 473 12.946 11.846 95 3.621 1.422 19131 139UT8 13.078 90 621 19500 20-00 t00 18956t It9328 49394 629992 62.962 85 9#OZ4 149907 5#872 21922@ 21.22@ 59 1.350 385 59015 5.015 93 924 39699 227 I I 0 119298 t89991 6#U99 26#244 269244 58 40.380 369332 109440 125#203 125.203 78 15.998 15.836 4.346 8B#164 3 8@#161 85 5.124 6.220 39836 14#180 5 I4s1T5 70 0 71#502 S8#388 18#621 227.647 8 117#639 80 TILLAGE OF ROOMY PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOOMTIlIG PERIOD 03 ENDING 7031190 t990 -9I T -T -O Y -T -O Cult no BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL WATER AND SEVER DIVISION 1319360 131:360 NATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. i REPR. 39082 299452 61 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1459560 36.390 149220 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 439950 109963 149506 TOTAL COMMODITIES 499950 129486 89376 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1079500 269871 3,915 TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. C 3469980 869730 410219 NATER VALVE AMD HYDRANT MAINT. 51 120 19049 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 689045 229008 439067 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19250 309 201 TOTAL COMMODITIES 369550 9.135 29132 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 109000 29499 9 TOTAL WATEA VALVE ANO HYDRANT MAIN t35984S 339951 459400 WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.E REPL. 539414 TO 79426 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Tb069S 199170 239281 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37.000 99246 109738 TOTAL COMMODITIES 649600 21.144 59994 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 249000 6.249 1839282 TOTAL MATER METER INSTAL.REPR.t RE 223929S 559809 40,013 fOUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 6 OPERATIONS 98,147 TS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1301213 329367 319968 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 909SOQ 229623 8T980S TOTAL COMMODITIES 999700 249921 199820 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 39000 750 199163 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE C OPER 3239,315 809861 1399593 SANITARY SEVER MAINT. t REPAIR 52.814 3298t4 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 709040 179505 17.226 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 189950 49734 99247 TOTAL COMMODITIES 119000 29748 19753 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 6t9000 159246 100 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER PAINT. E REPA 1609990 409233 18979 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 79290 33!9604 122 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4449000 1109997 1129196 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 4449000 1609997 1129196 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 39000 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 39000 750 25- TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1039720 25 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1059000 269150 19280 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 1089000 279000 19305 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITION 29750 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 29750 664 Z9434.840 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 390359000 ?See TAW e 60091.60 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES e9000 19998 2569448 TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUIStT390430750 T6t9430 6000160 TOTAL NATER AND SEWER DIVISION 691110470 196779699 193939353 593189120 PAGE 21 ONEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL S9384 1319360 131:360 90 39082 299452 61 Z9936t 67 4.463 41,374 6 419368 83 39923 1039585 527 1039066 96 169854 3059761 584 3059177 e8 99309 449978 44.978 51 120 19049 19049 64 all 349419 9 349409 94 109000 109000 too 109240 90.446 9 909436 67 89690 339414 539414 TO 79426 269262 269262 T1 49757 789606 700 179906 92 25,000 2S.000 100 219073 1839282 700 1829582 82 109642 969147 98,147 TS 137 29695 2.69S 3 69404 799680 7 199873 80 39000 3.000 t06 199163 1839722 T t839765 S7 19906 52.814 3298t4 T3 18,930 189950 100 t90t9 99247 99247 84 619000 619000 100 39VZ5 1429012 1429011 88 79290 33!9604 122 3319682 75 79290 331,804 122 3319682 7S 39000 39000 100 25- 25- 0 1039720 1039720 99 1069695 2069695 99 29750 29750 100 2569446 294349640 Z9434.840 e0 89000 89000 loo 2569448 294439590 294459590 80 4899465 593189120 19434 593!69683 79 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE ZZ BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO ONEXPENDEC UNENCUM X BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCURBEREO BALANCE 8AL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES t2.3ZS 3.061 3:600 946 89525 895Z5 69 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 429850 100701 13.931 29128 18.919 289919 67 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 559tiS 13:788 179T3I 39076 370444 3194'#4 68 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 49370 t0Q92 2t0 49160 4*160 95 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.200 20547 10686 19334 8,514 89514 83 TOTAL COMMODITIES 59800 19446 540 185 59260 50260 91 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES t329000 329994 36,580 959420 947 940473 12 TOTAL PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 15293T0 389079 39.016 195t9 tt39354 941 1120407 74 TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION 2679545 St0861 56.747 49595 1509798 94T 149x851 12 ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING U TOTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION 0 REFUSE OtSPOSAL DIVISION SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 199250 49806 59232 t9868 14.019 149018 73 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2.0919000 5229144 3479757 1629765 10743.243 728 t07429515 83 TOTAL COMMODITIES 112x500 287119 289386 109568 84.!14 84.it4 75 TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 29222*750 5559669 38t9375 1TS.Z01 198419376 728 I98409647 63 TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION 292229750 555.669 3819375 1759241 L98419376 728 1:8400647 83 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9939735 4489427 3*325 19525 9909410 990.410 100 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1029000 259497 7IVS29 30.471 30.471 30 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT CONSTt00959735 2139924 749654 19525 t.0209881 19020988t 93 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 49025.000 1:0060248 400259000 4xO259000 100 TOTAL FLOO9 CONTROL PROJECTS 490259000 10006.248 4.025.000 4.OZ5.000 100 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 110000 3x000 129000 129000 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 120.000 54.999 72.604 309598 1479346 82 1419314 67 TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 2329000 57.999 729604 300598 1599396 Be 1599314 69 GENERAL EQUIP G IMPRVMNTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENOITURES 150.000 37.500 6.247 69Z47 1439753 3t 143x722 96 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 3059000 16.248 305,000 3059000 100 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131190 1990-91 T -T -O T -T -O COR NO UNEXPENOEO UNENCUM 2 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL GENERAL EQUIP t IMPRVMNTS 4559000 1139748 60247 69247 4489753 31 4489722 99 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 469x200 1179288 90.421 72#806 37997T9 087 377.892 SL TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL 4699200 1119288 90.421 72r8O6 378#779 887 3779892 at TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 692769935 L*5699207 244*126 Itt9IT6 690329009 19000 690319809 96 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES COMMUNITY GROUPS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14.500 39624 8#i50 29890 69350 58 6*292 43 TOTAL COMMUNITY GROUPS 149300 39624 8*150 29690 6.350 58 6*292 43 4TH OF JULY t CIVIC EVENTS* ETC. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES t5#000 3#744 139820 13.828 1.172 [*172 6 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 219000 5*244 109624 554 10.!77 109176 48 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1099SO 29733 3#S26 2*846 79124 B 79116 65 TOTAL 4TH OF JULY t CIYic EVENTS* 4699SO IL*121 289478 179225 16#473 8 L89464 39 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2.950 73S 2*9S0 29950 t00 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES tO*S00 2#625 109500 109500 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES t#000 249 L9000 1*000 100 TOTAL HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 14*430 39609 149450 14*450 !00 TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES 75#900 L8#9S4 369628 209[18 39.2T3 66 399206 52 LIBRARY SERVICES LIBRARY OPERATIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 195469920 636*726 295469920 295469920 100 TOTAL LIBRARY OPERATIONS- 2#5469920 6369726 2*546*920 2.546992G 100 TOTAL LIBRARY SERVICES 295469920 6369726 295469920 295469920 t00 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE !#2829350 3209571 3419132 1709663 9419220 9419218 13 ,TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 192829350 3200Tt 3419132 1T0#663 941*220 9419216 13 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 85990S 219 471 2199St S*145 639914 639954 74 TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS 859905 219411 21*951 5#145 631954 63*9S4 74 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE FUNDS 1#3689253 3429042 3639083 1159808 t*0059174 L9005*IT2 73 PENSION FUNDS EMPLOYEE PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 7+it*600 t859394 1869946 569413 554.654 SS49654 7S PENSION FUNDS TOTAL EMPLOTEE PENSIONS POLICE PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS FIRENENS PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL FIREMENS PENSIONS TOTAL PENSION FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 03 ENDING 7131/90 1940-91 Y -T -O T -T -O FOR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 74I*60O 1859394 186*946 56.413 196529000 4t29993 t24#OST 4!#049 t*6S2*000 4t2*995 t24*OST 419049 197539000 4389243 128#020 43:150 19TS39000' 438.243 128*020 43#150 491469600 1*036*632 4399023 1409612 PAGE 24 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 554,654 554*654 75 t*SZT9943 I.527*943 92 i*5279943 1*527*943 92 t9624*980 196249960 93 19624,980 !*6249980 93 307079577 3#707.577 89 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERI00 03 ENDING 7)31190 1990-91 T -T -O V -T -O COR MO BUDGET, ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL TOTAL BUDGET EXPENSE 7g91TP386 IOe811sT9i 2�898�2d8 Mayor and Board of Trustees As mentioned August 7th, I am asking for relief to allow the decorative fence I installed 4 months ago at the curb to remain. The posts are installed in 4 feet of concrete. I did go the Village Hall and ask if it would be allowed and at no time was I told I could not put it up. I understand that bushes and trees can cause a hazard if people can't see properly, but this fence doesn't block the vision of a driver, pedestrian or bicycle rider. Throughout the neighborhood many residents have decorative fences, which have been there for years. They look very nice and have never caused any problems. I am attached pictures of other fences in the area. The only reason I am being told to take it down is because my one neighbor doesn't like us and complained. Everyone else in the neighborhood told me how nice it looks. I would be very pleased to sign a waiver or do whatever you suggest to assume responsibility for this decorative fence. I hope you will grant me the permission necessary to keep the fence. incerely,,,, ..; ,., „3 .« +,„ w C,� ,, .__ _,,,,,. ,� a r 0e. 4 -Le- 0NAlp- IS 1&NjICA mac) IlL 91 r"wr �,""`'" a„. ,„M ��.,�,:r � ,`�a "'�” TMa .rP,,�. nv .+;^a,,^ .ro"" e ,-w � �. ,i✓✓�* ';"a'�¢��.;'+ .7 "%% � � � .• R` ,a x aC e . . 0 ko It A -r a (...J t �,f 1\) e- 1 rte' k47 US,'It t -e..dc, rSe� .� ►�p�ovcti�,. Y 13 cr?, j2 a r ger l �- L -C ti t 0.Lou 'cw .. ,. P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N WHEREAS, our young people are valued members of the community, being the next generation of leaders and residents of our society; and WHEREAS, during this time of year the enthusiasm and excitement of going back to school may cause our young people to neglect the safety; and WHEREAS, most of the schools within the Village of Mount Prospect will begin their fall season the week of August 27, 1990 and it is imperative that all those operating vehicles do everything possible to prevent our young people from becoming victims of accidents; and WHEREAS, all citizens are urged to exercise extreme caution and be ever mindful of the presence of our young people while operating our vehicles, as well as remembering to have all occupants of our vehicles properly buckled -up while driving in our vehicles. NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the week of August 27-31, 1990 as SCHOOL'S OPEN WEEK in the village of mount Prospect and do urge everyone to exercise extra pedestrian and vehicular safety measures during this week. Gerald L. Farley Mayor ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk AUG 17 '90 1'L:10 GbrSS, HILL, Dr;LLME': -r GLASS, ffi-LL, DALIME Y -ER & RoTir, LTD. ATTORWZYS AT "W EvzzxT-xx M. HmL, j*- ago SIKOXIA BOULEVARD 51=s" Z B. DALLMZYER 'V0R-rNBR008' 11-1XN-ols 60062 MICH-kEL M. ROTH (708) 564-6910 F*VL -A,. TA-vzx.LLo FA.X (7W)564-3442 TO: Mr. John Dixon Village of Mount Prospect FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr. DATE., August 17, 1990 RE: state Liquor Commission Statistics P.2 CV coussKL BRADLZT K GL NS' -ADhtrtT*D WISCO-rer." V.&M The Illinois State Liquor Commission has provided statistics to me indicating that in the year 1987, 558 appeals were -made to the -- state Commission by licensee. Of this 58, 24 decisions of the Local Liquor Commissioners were affirmed. in 1988, the total number of appeals filed was 54 and 17 were affirmed. This means that in all other cases, the decision of the Local Liquor Commissioner was changed in some way, either the finding of guilty was reversed or the penalty assessed by the Local Liquor Commissioner was reduced. The State Commission has not yet supplied us with the figures for 1989. In the past four years in Mount Prospect, we have had two decisions appealed to the State Commission. Both of these were decisions made by the former Mayor Carolyn Krause. One decision was affirmed and one was reversed in its entirety. The decision which was affirmed is the Snuggery suspension of 30 days because a bartender had sold cocaine to an undercover agent. The decision which was reversed was an instance in which three young men went into Ye Olde Town Inn, one was 21, two were under 21. All three stood at the bar. The 21 year old ordered a pitcher of beer with three mugs. While standing at the bar, the two minors gave money to the 21 year old to purchase the pitcher. The bartender came back with a pitcher of beer and sat one mug in front of each customer, including the two minors. The testimony was undisputed. Carolyn found, as most rational people I believe would, that the bar had 'made a delivery of an alcoholic beverage to minors. The State Commission overturned that decision in effect saying that a liquor licensee has no responsibility whatsoever to assure that adults on their premises do not order alcohol for minors. ALIG '1.7 "�A] 12: L.1 GLASS. 11xLL,D4TTEYE-E&ROTH,LTD, Mr. John Dixon August 17,' 1990 Page 2 The most troubling decisions that have come from the State Commission in recent years, however, involved their desire to extend their jurisdiction beyond their statutory authority. Under the Illinois Liquor Code, the State commission has authority only to hear appeals from decisions of the Local Liquor Control Commissioner. in other words, if a violation of the license is alleged and a finding of guilty is made, the State Commission may then take appeal with respect to the finding of guilty on the violation. That is the State commission's sole authority. However, in two recent cases, municipalities have refused to increase the number of liquor licenses in particular classifications. These are decisions which the Illinois Liquor Code has reserved solely to the President and Board of Trustees of municipalities. The legislative decisions of the President and Board of Trustees are not appealable to an administrative body such - as the State Liquor Commission. However, the State Liquor Commission has ignored this limitation on their authority and has taken appeals from a particular attorney who represents the Illinois Retail Liquor Dealers Association. in one instance, the State Commission actually ordered the President and Board of Trustees of a particular municipality to create an additional liquor license. Thus, paving the way for the State Commission to dictate the number of licenses that municipalities must have. The second case is still pending before them. 171LCCAP.MeTd Village Qf C lount Prospect moun—tProspert, Illinois YY INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: EVERETTE M. HILL, JR., ESQ. FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 29, 1990 SUBJECT: LIQUOR ORDINANCE I have discussed with the Mayor items that we need to review concerning the liquor Ordinance which would be appropriate to bring up sometime in the near future for a Committee of the Whole meeting. The first one is an Amendment to the liquor Control Ordinance to provide forga 11E � Appeal to the 'Circuit Court. Since the Conference has not been successful in getting this i 'iii ,, ';i;;7 ii t"sTaUv—e-]pTWss in Springfield, the Mayor feels it is appropriate for us to 1,111,11 E it l�g review it again. Secondly, I would also like to suggest that we place in our local Ordinance provisions for iotice rif Closure ofctablishments When the Liquor Commissioner may determine that Commission that we have a provision that there be a Natice placed on the door prominently displaying that it is closed by Order of the Liquor Commissioner because of violation of the Local liquor m Or our Local Ordinance as well. ell JOHN FULTON DIXON JFD/rcw Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospers, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON yl(.4 FROM: EVERETTE M. HILL JR., ESQ. DATE: MAY 17, 1989 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL ORDINANCE To PRO DE FOR DIRECT APPEAL TO CIRCUIT COURT Please find attached a proposed Ordinance amending our Liquor Control Ordinance. Also attached is an earlier memo describing the" problem that the amendment will address. As you are aware, we have had no success with the legislators in achieving such a Statewide amendment. I was told by the Northwest Municipal Conference that it opposed by the Illinois Retail Liquor Dealers' Association. It is my opinion that the Village of Mount Prospect has the authority to do this under its Home Rule powers. The amendments provide as follows: 1. All appeals shall be directly to the Circuit Court- eliminating the State Liquor Commission from the Appellate process. 2. The licensee will be granted an automatic. stay of any suspension or revocation by filing a Notice of Intent to Appeal with the Village Clerk within 72 hours of the Mayor's decision. 3. The Police Department will post the premises which have been suspended or revoked. EVERETTE M. HILL, JR. EMH/rcw attachment 0LAss. HILL, DALLr1EYE iR & ROTii, LTD, AA'rVUN Vers sT "W =sent iGr K. Ulaie + Bade 390azs Duvcsv.sn w oocr.�cs E�racrrc M, EftLL.JR.' - OSTH9$OOH, ILLS:fOIs (300152 L.LtrtLwonu D,aLLM ev6a +iueAsz M aUtu (alai 004-eato .eYrrtea .n rKow.t� E-AItCaxttarcLL, JII �+ June 11, 1967 mayor Carolyn Krause Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, IL 60056 Re: State of Illinois Liquor Control Commission near Mayor Krause: we have on many occasions discussed the role of the State of Illinois Liquor Control Commission in r'eviewin4 decisions of Local Liquor Control Commissioners. It has been our mutual observation that the State Commission shows little respect for local Control over liquor licenses. We have found that despite legal constraints to the contrary, the State Commission ei#4.ea often substitutes its own opinions for the opinion of the Local Liquor Control Commissioner. It is my recommendation that we attempt to t.#ve legislation introduced in the General Assembly that would eliminate the State Liquor Control Commission's review of Local Liquor Commission decisions. If State Commission review were eliminated, the licensee would appeal decisions of the Local Liquor Control Commissioner directly to the Circuit Court. It is my opinion that now would a good time to attempt to get such legislation introduced. In 1986 Governor Thompson had reviewed the possibility of completely disbanding the Illinois Liquor Control Commission. My recommendation does not go that afar. It would simply take them out of the review process. I think this legislation is appropriate for. the following reasons: 1. --most decisions of municipal officials are not reviewat*Fe by a State Commission but rather are 910viewable under administrative review directly to the Circuit Court. 2. The State Commission has no sensitivity to local concerns about matters involving the Yale of alcohol. GLAss, HILL. DALLMEY EB & ROTH, LTD. Mayor Carolyn Krause June 11, 1987 Page 2 3. Perhaps the most distasteful aspect of the current system is that if the State Commission overrules the Local Commissioner and the Local Commissioner wishes k4> appeal that overruling order, then the Illinois Attorney Gen#ral represents the State Commission in that appeal. Effectively, we are left with a situation where all of the prestige and resources of the Attorney General's office (paid for by Illinois taxpayers) is directed at defending the actions of a liquor licensee who has already been Found guilty by a Local Commissioner. The licensee gets a free appellate lawyer at taxpayer expense! It is an absurd and unequitable situation. I am requesting that we attempt to recruit the Northwest Municipal Conference and the Illinois Municipal League in an effort to introduce and support such legislation. If I can be of any help in accomplishing that, please let me know. Very truly yours, /S/ Everette M. 8i&1, Jr. Everette M. 8111, sir. EMhjr/hm- ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, ACTING PURSUANT TO THEIR HOME RULE POWERS: SECTION ONE * : That §13.124.C. of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by deleting §13.124.0 in its entirety and substituting, therefore a new §13.124-C and §13.124.D., so that hereinafter said §13.124.0 and §13.124.D of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows: C. Any appeal from a decision of the Village President, in his capacity as Local Liquor Control Commissioner, shall be directly to the Circuit Court of Cook County, pursuant to Illinois Revised Statutes, Chapter 110, Article III, Administrative Review.' There shall be no appeal to the Illinois Liquor Commission.Ifthe licensee intends to appeal a suspension or revocation of license, the licensee must file a Notice of Intent to Appeal with the Village Clerk within 72 hours of receipt of the Suspension or Revocation Order. The filing of said Notice of Intent to Appeal shall stay the Suspension or Revocation Order until the 36th day after entry of the order if no Appeal is filed or upon entry of an Order from the Circuit Court of Cook County if an Appeal is filed. The failure to file said Notice of Intent to Appeal shall not deprive the licensee of the right to appeal to the Circuit Court of Cook County, but there shall be no automatic stay of an Order of Suspension or Revoca- tion. D. Twenty-four (24) hours before the commencement of any suspension or revocation, the Mount Prospect Police Department shall post on all entrances to the licensed establishment a notice that the premises is prohibited from selling or delivering alcoholic beverages by Order of the Mount Prospect Local Liquor Control Commissioner for violation of the Mount Prospect Village Code. The Notice shall be in letters not less than one-half (1/2) inch high and shall in the case of a suspension give the times of the suspension and in the case of a revocation state the exact time which the revocation goes into effect. The removal of said notice before the suspension ends by any person is prohibited and shall subject the person to a fine of not less than $200.00 nor more than $1,000.00.11 SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this ATTEST: Village Clerk day of P 1990. Village President BH/caf RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION PERTAINING TO EXPANDED HOURS OR SIDEHALK 9AFE AT 14 WEST PROSPECTAVENUE WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is considering amendment to the Village Code that would expand the hours that sidewalk cafes are permitted to operate; and WHEREAS, the Mayor & Board of Trustees believe that it would be beneficial to permit an experimental program to allow expanded hours prior to the adoption of such amendments. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the restaurant known as Sam's Place, located at 14 West Prospect Avenue, shall be permitted to operate its sidewalk cafe between the hours of 11:00 AM and 9:30 PM, seven days per week through November 15, 1990, which trail period shall be without any additional fees. SECTION TWO: The Village staff shall issue a report to the Mayor and Board of Trustees respect to this trial operation within two weeks after the sidewalk cafe at 14 West Prospect Avenue ceases operation. SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this 21st day of August, 1990. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-31-V-90, NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH LOCATION: 1400 KENSINGTON ROAD DATE: JUNE 13, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for zoning variations filed by the Northwest Assembly of God Church. The application was originally filed for (8) eight variations. A number of variations were eliminated due to later revisions of the site plan. The two variations reviewed by the Zoning Board were as follows: 1. A variation of the parking requirement of 543 spaces to allow 512 parking spaces. This is a variation of 31 parking spaces. 2. A variation of the 35% lot coverage in an R -X Residential District to permit a 61% lot coverage. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of April 26 and May 10. At the hearings, Attorney Greg Gann and expert witnesses presented evidence and testimony in support of the request. The attorney and experts explained that the proposed parking was sufficient for the Church, and that there would be no parking problem at peak times. Concerning the lot coverage variation, the attorney and experts demonstrated that this lot coverage for the church was typical of other churches in the Village, so the request was consistent with existing conditions. Also, the site will have complete stormwater management, so the higher lot coverage would not cause any flooding on adjoining properties. Additional details on the variations and testimony are found in the attached minutes. Approximately 10 residents spoke in opposition to the request. Residents were concerned about the large capacity of the church, and the fact that the large parking lot would adjoin single family homes on the west and north. Residents also believed the church would create traffic problems on Kensington Road, and effect property values. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 2-5 to deny the request. The majority voted against the variations, believing that not all the required standards for variations had been addressed. Members were opposed to the higher lot coverage, and stated that an adequate hardship had not been proven. Accordingly, the Zoning Board recommends that the request be denied. DMC:hg V)Ilol 4D AMA60A wt_ - r__ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS 1, ZBA-CASE NO. 31-V-90 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: May 10, 1990 Northwest'Assembly of God 1400 Kensington Rd. April 10, 1990 Variations from: Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. Section 14.1004.A to allow a 40' building height instead of 28'. Section 14.3012.A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. Section 14.3017 to allow 8.5' wide parking stall size instead of 9'. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 401 building height. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Len Petrucelli Ronald Cassidy Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May None Full Audience Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating this is a continuation from the April 26, 1990 Zoning Board meeting at the petitioners request. He then asked the petitioner to proceed with their request. Gregory Gann, the attorney for Northwest Assembly of God, thanked the Board for having this meeting at his request and noted that the Church has made additional modifications but they are requesting a variation for 31 parking spaces. Mr. Gann also asked that all of the exhibits be entered as evidence. He then continued stating that the Church had met with the neighbors the prior Monday and Wednesday night and listened to the concerns of the neighbors and have made ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 2 of 6 significant reductions to the proposal on the parking and lot coverage. Mr. Gann then compared the Northwest Assembly of God to other churches stating that they have as much right as any other church to worship where and how they like. Mr. Gann then commented that the church is not taxed but the people that attend the church are just like anyone else and felt the comment regarding the Church not being taxed was very unfair. He asked that the comment be stricken from the record. Mr. Gann then stated the modifications to the proposal has been greatly reduced bringing the lot coverage to 61% from 75% and the parking spaces from 724 to 512 which is a 30% decrease. He then stated that the Church is in conformity with other churches in Mount Prospect as far as the lot coverage. He stated that sanctuary size has been reduced from 2000 as originally proposed then to 1650 and now it will be 1400. He also stated that the elimination of parking on the East perimeter puts them in the retention requirements providing more than required by law. The site plan basically stays the same for the building. Mr. Cassidy asked if someone from the church could calculate the impervious surface and ground coverage for the existing building at the site. Mr. Gann complimented David Clements and Paul Bednar for their excellent suggestions and also the Village staff on their help. Mr. Gann then introduced Steven Olsen, architect for the petitioner. Mr. Olsen stated that the modification to the proposed site would eliminate 1 driveway and 2 rows of parking on the East edge of the property and would relocate the handicapped parking spaces to the West of the property. He also stated that there would be more landscaping and the island would be enlarged. Mr. Gann then introduced Dave Swanson, an expert witness for the church. Mr. Swanson is a Vice -President of a construction company and an Engineer. He is not -a member of the Church. Mr. Swanson stated that Mr. Gann had asked him to a do some consulting for him on the churches in Mount Prospect. Mr. Swanson, then compared the impervious surface and the size of the lot and building of the churches in Mount Prospect to the proposed church for Northwest Assembly of God. Mr. Swanson then proceeded by giving the Board the calculations for: 1. St. Raymond's School and Church -88% impervious surface. This property has 90,000 square feet. 2. Cumberland Baptist Church -74% impervious surface. this property has 39,000 square feet. ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 3 of 6 3. St. Paul Lutheran School and Church -the church and parking lot are 70% and the North part of the property is 51%. Mr. Swanson noted that the school is under construction and he received his calculations from the proposed drawing and what is existing on the property. The square footage is 51% with both the school and church. 4. Mount Prospect Bible Church- 69% lot coverage. There was no square footage given on this property. 5. St. Mark Lutheran School and Church -64% lot coverage and impervious surface. Mr. Swanson noted that this property is located across the street from each other and the calculation includes both pieces of property. 6. St. Emily's School and Church- 62% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 7. Peace Reformed Church -61% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 8. St. Thomas Beckett Church -60% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 9. Trinity United Methodist Church- 59% impervious surface. There was no square footage given for this property. 10. St. Cecilia's Church -57% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 11. St. John Episcopal church -47% impervious surface and lot coverage. Mr. Swanson noted that there is no off street parking for this church. There was no square footage given for this property. 12. Northwest Covenant Church -51% impervious surface and lot coverage. Mr. Swanson noted that he felt the parking for this facility is inadequate. There was no square footage given for this property. 13. Community Presybyterian Church -39% impervious surface and lot coverage. Mr. Swanson noted that the sanctuary at this church seats 350 people and has 50 parking spaces. There was no square footage given for this property. Chairman Basnik asked how many parking spaces St. Raymond's has. Mr. Swanson stated he did not count the number of parking spaces but commented that they have a unique parking lot, allowing everyone to pull in at one end and exiting at the other end. Mr. Gann then introduced Dave Landowehr, the engineer for the Northwest Assembly•of God Church. ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 4 of 6 Mr. Landowehr stated that the requirements for the retention for the new proposal has exceeded the requirements for the Village and the Metropolitian Sanitary ry District. Storage for the property will be in the Northeast corner of the property by the dry basin. Mr. Gann then introduced Victor Ley, Metro Transportation. Mr. Ley stated that with the revisions to the site plan the amount of time to exit the parking lot after a service would be 25 minutes. Mr. Gann then reminded the Board of the size of the driveways for ingress on egress with each drive being three ' lines. Mr. Ley then stated the level of service for the parking lot would be level C on,the eastern drive and the western drive would be a level B. Mr. Ley also stated that the level of service would remain the same at level A. Mr. Ley stated that no research was done on the side streets Newberry and Westgate, but by his opinion would not be affected by the proposed church. Mr. Gann then asked Mr. Lay if the level of service on Kensington would be affected by the ingress to the Church parking lot. Mr. Ley stated it would not affect Kensington Road. Mr. Gann then reviewed the requirements for A variation. He feels that the church has met all the requirements for variations to be granted. Mr. Gann then stated that the church is in no way a threat to the community and will not bring down the characteristics to the neighborhood. He also stated that this is a permitted use in a single family zoned area. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that this property is zoned R -X and this allows up to 35% lot coverage and the church's proposal is reasonable with the 61% lot coverage which falls between 35 and 75%, found in commercial areas. Ron Alfirevic, 805 Newberry Ln., presented the Board members with a copy of the comments by the neighborhood. Mr. Alfirevic stated that the proposal for the Church is still a bit to ambitious. He also feels that the traffic studies are invalid considering Kensington and Wolf Rds, are under construction and most people are avoiding the area. Mr. Alfirevic also stated that he had counted the cars on two occasions in the Church's temporary location at River Trails Junior High, one service had 250 cars the other had 230 cars. On each occasion it took the cars to exit was about 30 minutes. He,also stated that the homeowners property values will decrease with the new development. Mr. Alfirevic also stated that the burden of sacrifice seems to be on the residents. ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 5 of 6 Dick Radzak, 1611 Ironwood, commented that this is a developed area and the main reason he and probably most of the other residents bought there was because of the park district property being right there. He felt it would be good for his children when they were growing up. Mr. Radzak also questioned if the church fits the property and if not then it is not welcome in the neighborhood. He also questioned the height of the building and the noise from the church not only from cars but if the decide to put in an organ of some kind.' Ken Latos, 1002 Newberry, noted that there is no sidewalks in the neighborhood and is concerned on the impact of the traffic in the neighborhood. Bernie Donahue, 1605 Ironwood, feels the church has not reduced the size of the building and the problem is still there. Don Raab, 802 Newberry, feel the revisions have not changed anything as far as the lighting, storm sewer and the size of building. Mr. Raab is also concerned with the property value. Martin Venticinque, 811 Newberry, also is concerned with the property value. He also feels that Mr. Gann thinks everything is resolved with the neighbors and nothing really has been. Mary Ann Pickley, 1113 Sycamore, stated that she works for Baird and Warner Real Estate and feels the property value would very much be affected. Tim Metling, 1609 Ironwood, fells the church has not proven any hardship. Robert Artman, 806 Newberry, feels the site at Kensington and Wolf would be better for the Church. Mr. Landowehr stated that the existing lot coverage at Feehanville School is 16%. Mr. Gann then stated that the total square footage on the property including parking stalls, the aisles and sidewalks would be 180,000 sq. ft. The Board then reviewed the Case by going over the requirements for a variation. Chairman Basnik questioned on changing the ordinance of allowing a Church in residential. Mrs. O'May felt the church has a right to be there and would ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 6 of 6 not object. Mr. Brettrager asked that a recommendation to the Village Board be made on landscaping*. Chairman Basnik still questioned the size of the building. Mr. Petrucelli feels that no hardship has been proven. Mr. Lannon questioned if this a convenience for only having one service. Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioners a Special Use with the variations from: Section 14.1002.E to allow a lot coverage of now 61% instead of 35%. Section, 14.1004.A to allow a 40" building height instead of 28'. Section 14.3012.A to allow 512 parking spaces instead of 755 required,by Code. Section 14.30 ' 17 to allow an 8.51 wide parking stall size instead of 9'. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 401 building height. Chairman Basnik asked if anyone objected that they vote one time on all variations. No one objected. Mr. Lannon moved, Mrs. O'may seconded. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, O'May MAYS: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Basnik Motion denied by a vote of 2-5. These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AM ZONING DEPARTNUM Mount Prospect, 1111sols TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN WL— FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MAY 4,19" SUBJECT: NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH On Friday, May 4, 1 met with Attorney Greg Gann of Northwest Assembly of God Church. We discussed the Church's variation application, and the public hearing that was continued to May 10. Mr. Gann has advised me of the following: 1. At this time, the church is proposing to reduce seating in the main sanctuary to 1400. This is accomplished by deleting the balcony seating. 2. With this change, total parking has been reduced from 616 to 512, a reduction of 104 spaces. The 512 spaces represent 467 spaces for the sanctuary, and 45 spaces for the existing building, Please note that 76 spaces are required for the main building, which is used for office, classrooms and meeting space. Mr. Gann is requesting that the parking variation of 31 spaces be reconsidered for the existing building. 3. Total lot coverage is proposed for 59% to 60%, a reduction from the 66% discussed at the last meeting. As you know, 35% is the maximum lot coverage in the R -X District - Mr. Gann also stated that one result of this revision is that when church membership nears a point where there is a need for the balcony seating, the church would file for whatever lot coverage or parking variations would be necessary to accommodate the increased seating. In this way, the church has an opportunity to prove itself a good neighbor before maximum use of the site is allowed. Two additional staff comments are as follows: 1. Concerning traffic generation, staff notes that times of peak use of the church facilities will be Sundays and Wednesdays. This peak time will not coincide with rush hour traffic on Kensington, particularly when traffic is leaving the church late Wednesday evenings or Sundays at noon or 1:00 p.m. Mount Prospect Zoning board of Appeals May 4, 1990 Page 2 2. The lot coverage requirement in single family districts is intended to regulate development in areas where there is no stormwater detention. The ordinance is stating that you must have more open space than lot coverage, to prevent over -building and help control run-off. Northwest Assembly of God provides on-site detention to control stormwater. In other zoning districts where detention is required for development, lot coverage is allowed. from 75% to 80%. The church provides 59% to 60% lot coverage, a good compromise between the strict residential zoning requirement of 35%, and the 75% to 80% standard in areas where stormwater detention is required. DMC:hg cc: John Fulton Dixon V MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA-31-V-90 Hearing Date: April 26, 1990 PETITIONER: Northwest Assembly of God SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1400 Kensington Road PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 1990 REQUEST: Variations from: Section 14.1002.A to allow a zero foot front yard for parking instead of 401. Section 14.1002.8 to allow a,51 side yard instead of 10'. Section 14.1002.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' instead of 251. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. Section 14.1004.A to allow a 40' building height of 281. Section 14.3012.A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide parking stall size instead of 91. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building height. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Len Petrucelli Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience Chairman Basnik introduced the case stating the following variations are requested by the petitioner: 1. Section 14.1002.A to allow a zero foot front yard for parking instead of 40'. 2. Section 14.1002.B to allow a 5' side yard instead of 101. 3. Section 14.1002.B to allow a rear yard of 101 instead of 251. 4. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. 5. Section 14.004.A to allow a 401 building height. ZBA-31-V-90 April 26, 1990 Page 2 of 6 6. Section 14.3012-A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 756 required by Code. 7. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide parking stall size instead of 91. S. Section 14.1604.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building height. Gregory Gann, representing the petitioner, Northwest Assembly of God, opened thanking the Board and noting that on Monday, April 23, 1990, that Church representatives had met with the neighbors of the community at the Northwest Ministry Center also known as the former Feehanville School, to resolve some of their concerns. Mr. Gann also stated that the requests for variations numbers two and six are no longer needed. The lot coverage has been brought down to 67%-68%. Also, the parking spaces have been brought down to 616 spaces, and the sanctuary size has been reduced to 1620. David Landowehr, the project Engineer representing the Church, stated that the proposed development of the Church would have no impact on the sewer and water, which would be within Citizens Utilities District. He also explained the storm water run-offs and stated the Church would have their own detention basin for stormwater management. Steven Olsen, the architect for the Church and also a parishioner, explained to the Board about the design for the building and the reasons for the size. Mr. Olsen stated that the Northwest Ministry building would be the "base" of the new church, having classrooms which are existing and a large lobby and the sanctuary which would seat up to 1,620 people. The building, which will be up to 40' in height and slope down, allowing future seating if the Church grows in size. Victor Ley, representing the Church from Metro Transportation from Bloomingdale, IL. studied the traffic flow on Kensington and Wolf Roads for a twenty-four hour period and figured in the traffic from the Church in the hours of 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. and felt there was no impact on the traffic flow from his study. Mr. Cassidy questioned him if he included the side streets such as Westgate Rd. in his study. Mr. Lay stated Metro had not included the side streets in his study. Jim Nichols, Pastor for the Northwest Assembly of God, commented on the Church and their plans for rebuilding. Mr. Nichols stated that the Church likes to hold one service and wants the whole congregation to be there at once. ZBA-31-V-90 April 26, 1990 Page 3 of 6 In his closing statement, Mr. Gann address the variation standards and stated that the Church has met all the Zoning requirements and the exhibits that have been presented to the Board will hopefully clarify their proposal. Mr. Gann also stated he knows that all the concerns from the neighbors such as the car fumes and headlights are still going to be an issue and they hope to,work it out with the neighbors. He also stated that churches are allowed in residential areas and feels that it would be beneficial for the community. Mr. Gann thanked the Board and stated that the experts with the Church would be here for follow up questions. Chairman Basnik complimented Mr. Gann on his presentation stating that they answered most of the questions before they were even asked. Chairman Basnik then asked Paul Bednar from the Village to make his comments. Paul Bednar, Planner with the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that the proposal which is on a 9 -acre parcel is zoned for single-family which allows a Church and/or school. He also stated that the Village also had concerns with the perimeter setbacks to the single-family homes to the north and to the west and the lot coverage. He noted that the Church is required to put in a 251 setback and the landscape buffers should hopefully block the parking lot from the neighbors. The parking lot and other basins would be sufficient for the stormwater flow. He also stated that the lot coverage has been brought down to 679E . The remaining variations on the building height and parking stalls are also reasonable requests considering the height would only be at one point of the building and sloping down and the parking stall widths would be okay considering that the majority of people would be staying for a period of time as to a commercial establishment. In closing, Paul felt that the Church has addressed the staff concerns. Ron Alfirevic, 805 Newberry, spokesman for the neighbors, stated that the major concern is the number of parking spaces and the traffic that will take place with this large of a facility. Mr. Alfirevic stated that at an estimate time of 616 cars to leave the parking lot with only two exits at an average of six seconds would take 62 minutes"- Mr. Alfirevic feels that with all these cars trying to leave the parking lot at "one time" would create a lot of "gunk" from the fumes and then causing traffic problems on Kensington Road. ZBA-31-V-90 April 26,1990 Page 4 of 6 Dick Radzak, 1611 Ironwood, stated his major concern is the large parking lot and noted that this is ' most of the neighbors concerns. Mr. Radzak also feels that the study on the traffic flow is inaccurate because Wolf and Kensington Roads are under construction and this would drastically change when the construction is complete allowing more traffic on these roads. Mr. Radzak also feels that people attending the services will start using the side streets and affecting their neighborhood as far as the safety issue. Tim Metling, of 1609 Ironwood, stated that he and a neighbortook a ride through the Opus Business Center and noted the height on the parking lot lights is 181 to 201 which is reasonable and that the churches request for 261 would cast a decent shadow on the surrounding homes. Mr. Metling also stated that a another neighbor asked a realtor what the affect on their homes would be with a facility this size. The realtor sent back a letter stating that it would decrease their home values by 10%-20% which in Mr. Metling's view would decrease their homes by $20,000.00. Mr. Metling also stated that they asked the Church how many Mount Prospect residents attend their church and the church said in a 5 mile radius was 50% of their congregation. Jordan Saletko, 803 Newberry, stated he had two issues to address. The first concern is the Human Services for the neighborhood. Mr. Saletko stated that if someone in the neighborhood needed to get to the hospital or if an ambulance or the police department had to get into the neighborhood they would have a difficult time with all the traffic that the church would create on Kensington Roads, Mr. Saletko's other issue is how the Church feels they have been good neighbors. Mr. Saletko stated that on numerous occasions he has had to pick up garbage that has been tossed over his fence from the Church and presented the Board with a frisbee that had "Northwest Assembly of God" on it. Donald Raab, 802 Newberry, stated that he has been a resident of the Northeast corner of Kensington and Wolf Roads since 1971. He noted that the Northwest Assembly of God has only 600 parishioners and feels that the church is proposing is a gross overuse of this property. Mr. Raab also stated that Saint Emily's Church on Central Road has over 3000 parishioners and they have no problem to accommodate then. He also stated that the Church has over the past 17 years had an up and down history in the number of parishioners from 100 to 1200 back down to 600. . ZBA-31-V-90 April 26,1990 Page 5 of 6 Peter Hanchar, 1311 Ironwood, stated he has a few concerns with the new Church. His first concern is will this new building be fire protected because the previous building was not. Gerald Sharlog,'1400 E. Ironwood, stated his main concern is the parking lot and the lot coverage and used Willow Creek as an example that as it grew they asked for more property and will the Northwest Assembly of God ask for more if they do indeed increase in size. Martin Venticinique, 811 Newberry, stated a concern to the Board and to the experts the church had brought with them. He questioned where will all the snow go with the amount of with the amount of impervious surface. Mr. Raab also questioned what will be done with the property on the corner of Kensington and Wolf. They were told it would be a gymnasium of some sort. Bob Fitzgerald, 1319 Mulberry, commented that the neighborhood already has no sidewalks forcing the residents and their children to use the streets and the impact on the neighborhood of the cars from the church will become a safety issue. Mr. Gann, attorney for the Church , addressed the questions for the concerned the neighbors. Mr. Gann stated that he has been the attorney for the Northwest Assembly of God for the last 12 years but is not a parishioner. The other experts are not parishioners of the church except for Steven Olsen the architect. He also stated that a large percentage of the parishioners are from Mount Prospect. As for the fire protection issue, Mr. Gann stated that the new buildings will be sprinklered. Mr. Ley addressed the traffic concerns. He told the Board the peak hours of his study and that this was done during the churches service hours. Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Ley to address the question of the amount of time it would be to exit the parking lot of 616 cars. Mr. Ley could not answer the question. Mr. Landowher addressed the utility and water issues. He stated that the impact on the neighborhood would be minimal. Chairman Basnik addressed the pastor if the church feels it will grow. Mr. Nichols hopes that the church will grow and that this new facility will accommodate them. Mr. Brettrager questioned the pastor on the number of services, and the pastor stated again that the church likes to meet as one congregation. Mr. Gann addressed the snow removal question by the neighbors. He stated that the church would not use the 25' perimeter as a place to put the snow, but would simply ZBA-31-V-90 April 26, 1990 Page 6 of 6 put it in the parking lot and lose parking spaces as every other parking lot in the Village does in that period of time. Mr. Gann also stated that they will prevent people from using the side streets to park on and if need be they will have the Village patrol. Chairman Basnik asked the board to address the subject and closed off the public discussion. Mr. Lannon asked Steven Olsen what would be done with the building on Kensington and Wolf Rds. Mr. Olsen stated the building would be used as a gymnasium type of building with a few classrooms and a lobby. It would also remain the same height as the existing building. He also questioned the stormwater flow. If it was based on the 100 year flood. Mr. Landowehr stated it was based on the 100 year flood and if water was to exceed this amount it would flow southeast or into the basins. Mr. Lannon then asked Mr. Nichols why the church only had one service. Again Mr. Nichols stated that the church acts as one congregation. Mr. Petrucelli stated that he saw a problem with this because schools and churches were compatible with the single-family for offering services to the community, and this large project seems to be acting as more of a commercial enterprise than as a service to the community. Mrs. O'May disagreed with Mr. Petrucelli on the commercial use of the church stating that there are other churches in the Village and they're all in the same situation. Mr. Cassidy feels this church is to large for this parcel, stating that what that the church wants should not be zoned R -X. Mr.Brettrager disagreed with Mr.Cassidy stating that St.Raymond's in Mount Prospect has used all their impervious surface. Chairman Basnikstatedhe is still concerned on the growth of the Church and what would happen if they didn't increase in size, what would the neighborhood and the Village end up with. He also stated the concern of the parking lot, he is still questioning the amount of time it would take to empty it out. Mr. Lannon stated that this is a high intensity use for this parcel of land. He also stated that this is a lot of coverage for this property, and he would not support the proposal unless they brought in a better landscaping plan. Mr. Gann asked the Board if the Church could return the following Thursday to address the comments made by the Village. Mr. Brettrager asked that the reasons should be brought out know so the Church knows what to address. The two Main concerns of the Zoning Board are the lot coverage and the size of the church. Chairman Basnik adjourned the meeting stating that the case would be continued to the following Thursday unless heard otherwise. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary V.,,LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE*., PLAMONG A" ZONNG NPAxnan Mount Pmspect, numb TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER��a SUBJECT- ZBA-31-V-90, NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH LOCATION. 1400 KENSINGTON ROAD DATE: APRIL 19, 1990 REQUM The applicants are requesting the following variations: 1. Section 14.1002A to allow a zero foot front yard for parking instead of 40 feet. 2. Section 14.1002.B to allow a 5' side yard instead of 10'. 3. Section 14.1002.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' instead of 25'. 4. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. 5. Section 14.1004A to allow a 40' building height instead of 28'. 6. Section 14.3012A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. 7. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide parking stall size instead of 9'. 8. Section 14.1004.17 to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building height. The following comments were submitted by various staff departments. 1. Kensington Road is a State road. An I.D.O.T. permit will be required for all access to Kensington Road. Right and left turn exit lanes should be provided at all exits from the church property. The State will determine whether turning lanes should be provided on Kensington Road itself. Church officials should contact I.D.O.T. regarding this matter. Also, it must be verified as to whether Kensington Road right-of-way is fully dedicated. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA-31-V-90 April 19, 1990 2. There are easements shown on the plat of survey. Is there anything actually located within these easements? 3. An M.S.D. permit will be required. The Village has no sanitary sewer at this location. Citizens utilities may not allow the church to use their sanitary service without using their water also. The Village has an 8" watermain on the south side of Kensington Road. There is also a large North West Water Commission watermain on the south side of Kensington Road which must be avoided. 4. All Development Code requirements must be met, including but not limited to, street lights sidewalks and 11 parkway trees. New curbs will also be required along the parking lot perimeter. Storm sewer connections are both Village and State jurisdiction. An I.D.O.T. permit will be required to connect into the State sewer. 5. The present surface drainage flow is from the west, north and east onto this property. Drainage must not be blocked from any direction as a result of new construction. On-site detention will be required. 6. The Fire Prevention Bureau will determine location of all hydrants. Fire lanes must meet the fire codes. 7. Crime Prevention Office should be involved in reviewing the church security. 8. No construction equipment or grading changes will be allowed near the root zones of existing parkway trees. 9. A general concern was noted regarding the traffic flow in and out of this property as a result of the large expansion. 10. A resubdivision, consolidating all lots into one, is required MNG AND ZONING COMNENTS The Northwest Assembly of God Church owns the nine acre parcel which once was the home of the Feehanville School. The former 20,000 square foot school building had been converted to office and classrooms for the church years ago. The church is now proposing a 37,650 square foot building expansion on the property in order to accommodate a church auditorium with seating capacity of 2,000 people. The remaining 44,000 square feet will be office and classroom space. In an attempt to accommodate this size of expansion along with the required parking, a number of variations are requested. This property, along with adjacent park land to the east is zoned R -X, large lot single family. The present zoning allows a church as a permitted use. To the west and north is a single family subdivision zoned R-1. On the south side of Kensington Road is the Kensington Business Park zoned I-1. The River Trails Junior High School and park land abut this property on the eastern edge. The Northwest Assembly of God also owns the Gil Basnik - Page 3 ZBA-31-V-90 April 19, 1990 corner lot property on Wolf and Kensington which, up until last year's fire, was the home Of the church sanctuary. The Comprehensive Plan, updated as recently as December of 1988, divides this parcel for two uses; the west being Institutional and the eastern half being Community/Regional Open Space. A change to the Comprehensive Plan will be required, A large portion of this property is presently vacant and this is especially important considering the large percentage of vacant land abutting the s4e family homes. There is only one area along the west property line where there is an existing 5 foot parking lot setback. For this reason, we question why the new parking lot cannot meet the setback requirements of 10 feet on the west and 25 feet on the north. Understandably, the total number of parking spaces will be decreased along with a probably decrease in the building size as a result. But it appears to be a feasible option. 'The petitioner should address this comment. Each specific variation is addressed below: 1. A zero foot fr yArd to lgave e wristing p area intact at -the MUth sl comer, It would be possible to remove a portion- of this asphalt area in order to meet Code. Approximately 8 parking spaces would be lost as a result. An increase in the parking lot setback will benefit the on-site traffic flow and safety. The remainder of the front yard setback meets Code. 2. A 5 foot side yAtd-WQng3he west p[M line instead of 10 feet. It is also possible to increase the setback on the west property line to 10, by relocating the entire parking area 5 feet to the east. Approximately, 7 spaces would be lost with the change. The 10 foot side yard would accommodate a better landscape/buffer treatment. The minimum recommended for plantings is 10 feet. I i I- , I IM37 MIN 111MM=1 I I M$ I fir 4. 75% lot covera r th r than 35% - For an institutional property, such as a church, 35% total lot coverage is somewhat unrealistically low. This standard is primarily for single family areas where there is no detention. A single family house, could meet this coverage, requirement with ease. Commercial or industrial buildings would be allowed 75% lot coverage, by Code. Since this church building, located on a large single family lot is a hybrid, it seems reasonable that the allowable lot ,coverage be more than 35% but less than 75%. By providing increased perimeter yard setbacks, as recommended above, the lot coverage would be decreased. Gil Basnik - Page 4 ZBA-31-V-90 April 19, 1990 5. A 40 fQM building height instead of 28 feet to accommodate a dome gn tht auditorium - Building elevation drawings will help to visualize this height. The fact that the building dome is to be located at the center of this 9 acre parcel, should help minimize any visual impact it will have on the neighborhood. . 6. 7244 parking .Maccs instead of 755 - We concur with the findings of the petitionees traffic consultant, that the parking spaces provided will be adequate even on the busiest day. 7. Allom an 8.5 foot wide oarkine stall instead of 9 feet - The Zoning Code allows the Director of Planning and Zoning discretion to permit smaller stall widths for long-term parking in industrial or office settings. An institutional use, such as this church, is also an appropriate long-term parking provider and could be permitted an 8.5 foot stall width. ri •lr • ! .. • • 1 1.. 111 1 1 , 1 Also, it should be noted that parking lot lighting cannot shine onto adjoining single family properties. It would be appropriate to only allow parking lot lights on evenings when there is a service or activity. Lastly, it is important to emphasize that all storm water run-off from the new parking areas will be controlled and directed to landscaped detention areas in front of the building. No stormwater will discharge onto adjoining properties. In summary, additional parking lot setbacks can be accommodated which will benefit the single family neighbors and decrease the lot coverage. The result may be the reduction of a very small number of seats in the auditorium. The petitioner must adequately address this possibility. PB:hg CAF/ 6/27/90 X *110 4 z ?.Vk AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 EAST KENSINGTON ROAD AND COMMONLY KNOW AS NOR MEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH WHEREAS, Northwest Assembly of God Church (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, which application was subsequently amended by deleting specific variation requests, for property commonly known as 1400 East Kensington Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: The East 260 feet of the South 600 feet of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, together with the West 300 feet of the South 600 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, together with the North 550 feet of the West 158.4 feet of the East 335 feed of the West 635 feet of the South 600 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, all in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Section 14.1002.E of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to allow an impervious lot surface coverage of 61%, instead of the permitted maximum of 35%; a variation from Section 14.3012.A. to permit 512 parking spaces, instead of the required 543; and, a variation from Section 14.1004.A to permit a building height of forty feet (401), instead of the permitted 28 feet at the peak of the church santuary; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 31-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of April, 1990, and the 10th day of May, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of April, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant the following variations, as shown on the Site Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "All and described as follows: A variation from Section 14.1002.E to surface lot coverage of 61% in order to sanctuary with a seating capacity structures and a parking lot. C allow an impervious construct a church of 1,400, related ZBA 31-V-90 Page 2 of 2 2. A variation from Section 14.3012.A to allow 512 parking spaces, instead of the required 543 spaces. 3. A variation from Section 14.1004.A to permit a building height of forty feet (401) for the sanctuary, instead of the permitted height of 281. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 cf Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. gECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk in Oaf h' I I I I II I H I I I tf i1N I i i I h I I'i i I'I G M, � 4 (01% CNUME tee*«Y,ss� ,�ts+1,�t�.+_ r• moa_ S,IO,9D n TTP' CAP/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE PALLOT FOR THE NOVEMBER 6, 1990 ELECTION BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: -SECTION ONE: That pursuant to the authority vested in the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect by Article VII of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, 1970, an advisory referendum shall be held in the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, during the general election to be held November 6, 1990, for the purpose of submitting to the voters the following proposition: Shall the Corporate Authorities of the Village of mount Prospect authorize the construction of a new Public Safety Building to be located at 112 East Northwest Highway at a cost of $6,992,000.00. if SECTION TWO: That the local election official shall certify the above public question to the election authority having jurisdiction over the territory of the Village of Mount Prospect in the manner provided by law. SECTION THREE: That Notice of said election shall be published and the form of the ballot shall be prepared in the form and manner provided by law. SECTION FOUR: That said advisory referendum regarding said public question and all matters pertaining thereto shall be conducted in the manner prescribed by statute for and during the aforesaid general election. SECTION FIVE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990. ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Gerald L. Farley Mayor h VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER t - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBAA5-V-90, EUGENE J. KOZIOL LOCATION: 519 SOUTH EDWARD STREET DATE: JULY 12, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for variances filed by Mr. Eugene Koziol of 510 South Edward Street. The application was filed to increase the permitted 15 foot driveway width to 17 feet, and to permit a parking pad with a zero foot front setback and a 0.5 foot sideyard. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance requires a 30 foot front setback and a 7.5 foot sideyard. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Koziol presented testimony in support of the request. He also presented a letter from his neighbors, Mr. & Mrs. McClellan at 517 South Edward Street, stating that they had no objections provided the parking pad be pitched to ensure that no drainage flowed onto their property. Mr. Koziol explained that the variance was necessary to accommodate the household's three vehicles. He stated that the pad would be constructed to drain toward the street. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was noted that similar front and sideyard encroachments to accommodate parking pads are present in the immediate neighborhood. The Zoning Board confirmed that all drainage would be toward the street and not onto adjoining property. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approve the request for a 17 foot driveway, a zero foot front setback and 0.5 foot sideyard for a parking pad at 519 South Edward Street. I�T roe t., pKoeose,t> pr+kKl,"4 PAP .4r -5-11 6 - "w00% oe D 57— otrr I-vcfW&o— Q6 1.) vV F1 A MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I ZBA CASE NO. 45-V-90 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: July 12, 1990 Eugene Koziol 519 South Edward Street June 26, 1990 Variations are requested from the following Sections of the Ordinance: 1. Section 14.3016.A to allow a 17 foot driveway for a one -car garage instead of the maximum allowed 15 foot.' 2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot front yard instead of the required 30 foot. 3. Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 1/2 foot sideyard to permit a parking pad on the north side of the driveway. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy None Chairman Basnik introduced this case as being a request by Eugene Koziol for variations to allow a 17 foot driveway for a one -car garage, and a variation to reduce the required sideyard to 1/2 foot fora parking pad. Mr. Eugene Koziol introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he presently has a one -car garage at his residence with a narrow driveway. He indicated he would like to construct a parking pad in the sideyard to allow parking for an additional car. He indicated that it is very difficult to maneuver cars in and out of the one -car driveway and that he would benefit from the convenience of having a parking apron in the required side yard. Mr. Koziol stated that his contractor had indicated that the driveway pad could be constructed in a fashion that would not discharge stormwater run-off to the adjoining home at 517 South Edward Street. Mr. Clements then summarized the request and stated that a staff inspection of the property in the immediate neighborhood found several residents with one -car garages and parking aprons on the same street. Mr. Clements indicated that the proposed parking apron would ZBA-45-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 not be out of character with the neighborhood. He also stated that the engineer noted that careful grading should be followed to make sure that the parking apron does not increase stormwater run-off onto the adjoining property. He stated this concern is important because the home next door has a below -grade garage. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that the parking pad would be in keeping with the character of this neighborhood, and that as long as the parking apron could be constructed so as to not cause stormwater run-off to the adjoining properties, there would be no objections to the request. The Zoning Board of Appeals also made reference to a letter in support of the request from Mr. & Mrs. McClellan, the adjoining property owner at 517 South Edward Street. Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Pratt moved that the request be approved subject to engineer approval of a grading plan prior to issuance of a building permit. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, David M. Clements VffiLkE OF MOUNT PROSPLCT PLANNMG AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN 0X__ FROM: DAVID NL CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT- ZBA45-V.90, EUGENE J. KOZIOL LOCATION: 519 SOUTH EDWARD STREET DATE: JULY 5, 1990 The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.3016-k3 so that a 17 foot driveway for a one -car garage may be constructed. A 15 foot driveway is permitted. A second variation from Section 14.1102A is requested so that a zero foot front setback may be maintained. A 30 foot front yard is required under Code. The petitioner requests a third variation from Section 14.1102.13 to allow a 0.5 foot sideyard for a parking pad. Engineering is concerned that a drainage problem could be created because the home to the north has a garage floor below the grade of the street. The potential drainage problem could be solved by placing the parking pad on the opposite side of the existing driveway. Inspection Services notes that because of the drainage problem the driveway must be built at or below existing grade. PLAMNG A"ZOI NING COMMEM Mr. Koziol would like to widen the existing driveway at his residence to 17 feet. This will accommodate the household's three vehicles. Staff notes the grade change which will require constructing the parking pad such that drainage is directed back onto the applicant's property and not on the neighbor's lot. Similar front and-sideyard encroachments to accommodate parking pads are present in the immediate neighborhood, so this request would not create a new condition in the area. The staff has no objections to the parking apron, but believe a carefully engineered grading plan is the only way to prevent additional run-off on the adjoining property. DMC:bg 3 UT9a9q P94Uelb SUOT4eTIPA 9144 '8POD 9beTTTA 9lq4 go VT a94dPqo go V09*VT UOT409S JO SUOTSTAoad 9144 tMm 90UPPaO00e UI _-HflOd Nolloas *A4aadoad 409CqnS 9q4 04 SP 409339 Pug 90103 TTnJ UT UTPM91 TTPqS SUOT4PTnb9a Pup saoupuTpao 4oadsoacl 4unow go BbPTTTA';DTqieDTTdde a9q4O TTP UT9a9q P94UPab SUOT4PTaRA 9q4 JOJ qdaoxa :aHUHI NOIlDaS ,ppd bUTNand P jog OPTAoad o4 a9pao UT Xopqqes pavX 4uoag 0) 400J Oa9z P 4Tmaad o-4 pup ! (,,q) saT4ouT XTS go Xoeq-4as papA 9PTs v 4Tuxaad o4 g' ZOTT - VT UOT409S UIOJJ UOT4VTJPA P ' (, LT) 4999 U994UBA9S JO q4PTM XPM9AT1p e 4pniad o4 C'V*9T0C'VT UOT409S UlOaJ UOT4PTaPA P A4aadoad qoalqnS aq4 04 queab Aqaaaq 4oadsoad* 4unow go 9bvITTA 9q4 JO saa4snaL go papog Pup 4u9PTs9Jd 9141 :OMI NOIJDag - 4oadsoad 4UnOW 90 9bPTTTA 9144 90 saa4snal go papog pup 4U9PTSald aqq Aq 4op3 90 SbUTPUTJ SV UT919q P94Pa0CiJO0UT gap aAoqpUT819q q4JOJ 49S STV4T09A aql :allo NOIyOSS :SIONIqqI 'AINnOD XOOD '10adSOUd INnOK aO HOVqUIA alll JO SaalSn-dl aO Cl'dVOq UNY INa(IISaUcl alll A9 GaNIVGUO 11 ag laWdaUaHl 'MON *SUOT4PTaRA ATPS bUTqUVab Aq patzes aq PTnom qoadsOld 4unoW go ;Db'eTTTA 9IT4 JO s4s9_Ta:4UT 4seq aqq 4pq4 pauiuua4ap 9APq pup 06 -A -9V vez go 4oa[qns 9q4 bUT9q SUOT49T1PA aqq 04 uoT4ezEapTsuoo aaTqq.Tn _T UaATb axetl 96PTTTA 9144 JO saa4snal go papog pup 4U9PTSqad aqq pup 40aasoad 4unow go 9bPTTTA aqq go saaqsnal go papog pup 4U9PTS9Jd 9744 04 UOT4PPU9UrMOOaa PUP SbUTPUTJ s4T P944Tmqns svq sTpaddy go PaPOq bUT' uoz 9144 'svauaHm PUP !0661 'aunf go ARP 1449Z 9144 UO PT919H 409asOad 4unok aiq4 UT P9tlsTTqnd 3oaj9tl4 aoT4ou a9doad pup anp o4 4upnsand '066T 'ATnf go APP q4z1 atI4 uo 40adsoja 4unOW 90 9bVITTA a144 JO sTpaddV go paleoq bUTUOZ aqq aaojaq 06 -A -SV -ON esvo V9z go 4oalqns aqq bUTaq pa4sanbaa SUOT4PTJPA 91q-4 UO PT;D14 SPM bUTaP9lq C)TTq'nd P ISVaa* pup !PIPA qUOaJ 400J OJ9Z v 4Tula9d 04 V - ZOTT - VT UIOJJ UOT49TaPA P 'PUP :(i9) BOUT XTS JO xopq4as paPA apTs P 4Tmaad 04 S-ZOTT-VT UOT409S MOJJ UOT4PTaPA P !,ST P9JTnba_T 9144 JO Ple9-4SUT (,LT) 4993 Uaaqu9AaS APM9A_11p le qTuLiad 04 VV19TOUVT UOT409S UIOJJ SUOT4PTaPA S3[a9S 1aUOT4T 49d 'SVaHaHM L= ZZ9699T 29clunN 4U9UlnDOa sle 9961 'TT AP14 UO STOUT III Tli 'A-4unoo N000 90 s9T4TI 90 JP_TqSTf)9H 9144 JO 901330 aLI4 UT P9a94STbea 3oaiaq4 qpTd o4 bUTP.1033P l4oadsOld qUnOW JO 9bPTTTA 9q4 UT UPTPTa9l4 1pdTOuiad PaTql 9144 JO qSPa 'TT 9buPH 'q4loN Tv dTqsumol 'ZT UoT4oas go 4jpd JO UOTSTATP S,bUTXa9Tt19O UT Z 40rI 90 UOTSTATpqns P 'Nand aTUU09' S'9-InS U',A 4 T IT 4011 :sp paqTaosap ATTvb9T I(Aqaadoad qoaCqns st? 04 P9.1.193eJ a94JPuTalall) -499a4S pa-empa il-4noS 6T9 sle uAOU3[ ATuOmmoo A4aadoad jog *ISTOUTTTI lqoadsoad 4undw go 9POD 95PTTTA alq4 go vT j94dPiq0 uiojj SUOT4PTaeA aOJ UOT4POTIddp up P9TT3 sPq (19uOT4T49d sP 04 POaaajaa a94JVUT9J914) ToTzo>J'-f auabna ISVaUaHM !aMSG_UVMGa HInOS 619 Sy NMONX )VINOWN05 AlHadOHd aOa SNOIIVIUVA ONIINVIdD aONVNIGHO XV 'ON a0NVNIG'dO 06/0T/8 /avo ZBA 45-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk .1990. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-53-V-90, PAUL A. AND BARBARA J. MAIER LOCATION: 319 SOUTH BEVERLY LANE DATE: JULY 13, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for a variation filed by Mr. Paul Maier. The application was filed to permit a 6 foot sideyard to accommodate a room addition. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows a 10 foot sideyard on this lot. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Maier presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Maier explained that the pie - shape of the lot resulted in the very wide street frontage from which the sideyard requirement was determined. He also noted that a 8'-10' hedge along the property line would screen the addition from the neighbors, and that the addition would be no closer than 15 feet from the neighbor's house. Mr. Maier also explained that the addition was necessary to enlarge the family room which currently only holds four people comfortably. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and noted that the pie -shape of the lot and the position of the existing home on the lot, contributed to the hardship. The Zoning Board also noted that no one objected to the request and that the addition would not adversely impact the neighborhood. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approve the request for a 6 foot sideyard to accommodate a room addition at 319 South Beverly Lane. DMC:hg tw SK BEVERLY r, 0 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 53-V-90 Hearing Date: July 12, 1990 PETITIONER: Paul Maier SUBJECT PROPERTY: 319 South Beverly Street PUBLICATION DATE: June 26, 1990 REQUEST: A variation is requested from Section 14.11023 to allow a 6 foot sideyard setback for a room addition instead of the required 10 foot minimum setback. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced the request and stated that the application was filed to reduce the 10 foot required sideyard to 6 feet to permit the construction of a room addition. Mr. Paul Maier introduced himself to the Zoning Board and indicated that he would like to construct a family room addition on the rear of his home at 319 South Beverly Lane. He indicated that his property is a pie -shaped lot and that the proposed room addition is requested to be 6 feet from the lot line at the nearest point. Mr. Maier indicated that it would be difficult to offset the room addition to meet the 10 foot required sideyard, and that this would lead to increased construction costs and would affect the size and desirability of the room addition. He noted that there is a mature hedge between his property and 321 South Beverly Street and that this landscaping would screen visibility of the room addition. Mr. Clements then presented the staff summary of this petition and concurred with Mr. Maier's statements that this is an irregular-shaped parcel. Mr. Clements noted that the side lot lines are not parallel and that this plus the placement of the house on the lot contributes somewhat to the hardship with the case. Mr. Clements noted that it would be difficult to build a reasonably sized room addition without variations due to the location of the house on the lot. Mr. Clements noted that a staff inspection of the neighborhood found substantial side yards and open space on all nearby lots, but that the 6 foot setback proposed for this room addition was sufficient, and emphasized that the 6 foot dimension is only the closest ZBA-53-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 point of the room addition, and that the setback increases to 8 feet at the point where the room addition meets the existing home. Mr. Clements also pointed out the fact that an adjoining densely -planted shrub would screen the room addition from the neighbor's property. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that the pie - shaped lot contributes to a hardship in meeting the 10 foot required sideyard. The Zoning Board also noted that because of the pie -shaped lot and the extreme frontage of this property, the side yard requirement is at the maximum of the Ordinance and not necessarily typical with the neighborhood. Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of a variation to reduce the 10 foot required sideyard to 6 feet for the property at 319 South Beverly Lane. The motion was seconded by Mrs. Skowron. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, �A - uh"_4 David M. Clements OF MOUNT PROSPLLT PLANNING AM ZOMING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN MV -1 FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT. ZBA-53-V.9o, PAUL A. AND BARBARA J. MAIER LOCATION: 319 SOUTH BEVERLY LANE DATE: JULY 5, I"o REQ The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14.1102.B to allow -a sideyard of 6 feet. The Code requires a sideyard to be 10 ft. or 10% of lot width whichever is less. The petitioner proposes to construct a room addition. VILLAGE STAFF COhMUMS Both Engineering and Inspection Services suggest that no fill is to be placed in the sideyard which would alter drainage. Grading plans should also be submitted. PJAN�G AND ZONTN__ COMMENTS Mr. Maiees home is on a pie -shaped lot at 319 South Beverly Lane. The house is quite small. He hopes to construct an addition to enlarge the current family room which only holds four people comfortably. Because of the location of the house on the lot, any addition to the building would encroach on the required sideyard. A dense, 8'-10' hedge is located along the property line and would screen the addition from the neighboring residence. At the narrowest point, the addition would be 15 feet from the neighbor's house. The pie -shape of the lot and the position of the existing home on the lot, contribute to the need for a variation. Considering these hardships, and the amount of screening provided, staff recommends approval of the request. DMC:hg UT919q P9qUPab SUOT4PTaPA 9144 '9POD 9bvTTTA 9744 90 VT ja4dPq3 go V09*VT UOT409S 30 SuOTsTAoad 9144 iq4Tm aouppa000p u, -A4jadoad 4oaEqnS aqq o4 sp 4oa33g pup 93lo3 TTnj UT UTPm9a TT94s seoupuTpao 4oadsoad 4unow go 9bPTA suoT4PTn59a p�p 'aTqPDTTddp TT* a9q4O TTP UT9a9q P94UPA SUOT4PT2PA 9q4 aOj 4daoxa a-aRH-j--X-0-jjOSS -bUTTT9mP ATTulv; 9TbUTs bUT4STXO 9q4 04 UOT4TPPV UP PPV 04 JaPao UT (,9) 4999 XTS JO PIPA OPTs v 4Tmaed o4 i'EOTT'VT UOT409S MOIJ UOT4PTaPA P k4aadoad 4oalqns aqq 04 4uvab Aqaaai4 4oadsoad' 4unow go 9bPTTTA 9lq4 90 saa4snaj, go pzvog PUP W9PTs9ad 9T41 : Omi, 3-0-1-155,9-s *4oadsOad 4unON 90 ebvTTTA aqq go saaqsnal go PJeOS pup W9PTs9ad aqq Aq qoej JO SbUTPUTJ SV UT9a9q pe4eaodioDUT eap eAoqeUT9J9q qqaog 49s sTP4TD9a aqi 1,79NNOT-N-5-T-132S :SIONI'Ill 'XINnOD X003 '13MSOHd INnOW aO aDYMIA alli ao samsmi ao auvoa aKv maaisaad alll A9 UaNIVCHo Li ag IaHoaaaaH.L MON *SUOT4PTJPA PTPS bUTqUPJb Aq pataes aq PTnom 4oadsoad 4unoN go 9bPTT*TA'914-4 go sqs9'_19-4UT 4seq 9q4 4Vq4 PaUTUL1849P OAeq PUP 06 -A -ES Y9Z go 4oalqns 9q4 f)UT9q' SUOT4PTJVA 9q4 04 UOT4Va9PTSUO0 -iaq4an3 U9ATb 9ARti abRTTTA Olq4 90 saa4sna,L JO PaVOS Pup 4u9PTsead 9q4 PUP 409asoad qunow go 9bPTTTA aq4 go S994SrL11 go PIV09 PUP W9PTS9ad 9144 0-4 UOT4VPU9UEMO09a pup SbUTPUTJ s4T P944Tmqns S914 sTeaddv go PaPOS bUTuoz aqq lsvadaHm PUP -'066T lounr go Avp T449Z 9144 uo go o d quno aqq UT p9qSTlqnd 3oaaai44 8OT40U aadoad pup anp o4 4uensand '066T 'ATnr JO AeP 'q4ZT aq4 uo, 4oadsoad 4unoN 30 ObVTTTA aqq go sTeaddv go PaeOq f)UTUOZ 9q4 OaOgOq 06 -A -CS -ON esvo YSZ go 4oalqns 9q4 JBUTBq pe-4sanbea SUOT:JPTIPA 8144 uO PT9T4 SPM bUTJle9q OTjqnd ie lsyau' aHm P9_TTnb9a atl-4 go PUP !UOT4TPPe moon P 4on'14SUOa 04 1OPaO UT OT PP94SUT (,9) 4993 xTs go Xovq4as pasA apTs P 4i=ad 04 ff'ZOTT'VT uOT400S *mozxj suoT,4vT;reA xees sl9UO'r4T4ad 'sva*uaHm PUP !Z80ZOLT aaqmnx 4uamnooa SP 'LT a9qO-400 UO STOUTTTI IA4unoo :KooZ) go s9T4Tl JO JP24STb9H 9144 90 80T330 91q4 UT P9_T94STb9l 309a9144 4PTd 04 bUTP-1000e 'UeTPT-1914 TedT0UTlcj' PaTgj, 9gq go qsPa ITT ObugH 'Tl4aOX TV dTtISUMOJ 'OTUOT40aS go V/T 4SPOIT41ON 9q4 go 4aled go UOTSTATpqns ie IV 'ON '4Tufl S-41#TeH u8T4PH UT VT 4OrI :sp paqTaosap ATTPb9T I(Aqaadoad qoaCqns sp 04 P91a9991 J949eUTOa9q) 9uPq ATa6A99 q4noS 6TC se umouX AT'uOulmOO A4aadoid aoj IsTouTTTI l4oadsoad 4unow go 9POD 9bPTTTA 9q4 JO VT . a94dPqo moag SUOT49TIeA aOj UOT4POTTdde UP P9TT3 9Aeq (SJ9UOT4T49d Se 0-4 P9.la839_T aq-43eUT8a9t[) XaTeW'-f e_Teqleq PUP V Tned 'SiaHaHM NNTI AqaaAag HS 61C SY MORA XqXOWWO5 Aivadoud wa SNOIIVIUVA 5XIINVED aoKVKIGUO KV ON HONVNIGUO 06/CT/8 /avo ZBA 53-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-54-V-90, ZBA-55-SU-90, CRAIG STEZSKAL LOCATION: 32 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD DATE: JULY 27, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on the application filed by Craig Sterskal. The application affects the property at 32 South Busse Road and includes the following requests: - Special Use Permit to allow a three -car garage. - Variance to Section 14.3016 to allow a 60 foot tum -around in a driveway instead of the maximum 21 feet allowed. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Sterskal presented testimony in support of the request. He explained the turn -around would make access onto busy Busse Road easier and safer. The three -car garage will be used to store an antique car. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that three -car garages on large lots with large houses are becoming fairly typical. The Board stated that the large size of this lot (113' X 385') and the landscaping proposed would ensure that this development would not have any adverse impact on the area. The Zoning Board also acknowledged the busy condition of Busse Road and the safety advantage of a driveway turn -around to eliminate backing out onto Busse Road. Accordingly, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a three - car garage and a 60 foot driveway turn -around at 32 South Busse Road. . DMC:hg ........... $,2e Tf t � i"�un oG G„`JrCun tcrtnCG �. fcea moo..` 'l:sG • .-, YrerB /�n�C 2O'Y- 27 /G` a°� Pik MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 54-V-90 Hearing Date: July 26, 1990 55 -SU -90 PETITIONER: Craig St6zskal SUBJECT PROPERTY: 32 South Busse Road PUBLICATION DATE: June, 26, 1990 REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.3016 to permit a 60' diameter turnaround for a driveway. Special Use permit for a three -car garage. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager ABSENT: Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Michaele Skowron OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that this is a continuation from the July 12, 1990 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting. Chairman Basnik continued by stating that the petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016 to permit a 60' diameter turnaround for a driveway. The petitioner is also requesting a Special Use permit for a three -car garage. The petitioner, Craig Sterskal of 32 South Busse Road, presented his case by stating that he plans to build a home on Busse Road and the request for the turnaround on his driveway is for easier access pulling into and out of his driveway. Mr. Sterskal also stated that the request for the three -car garage is he owns an antique car and would like to store it in the garage and also use it for his two other cars. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the requests have no adverse effect on surrounding neighbors, and the driveway would only have one curb cut onto Busse Rd. He also noted that three -car garages are becoming more typical on new homes. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the 2BA-54-V-90 ZBA-55-SU-90 July 26,1990 Page 2 of 2 petitioners request for a variation from Section 14-3016 to permit a 60' diameter turnaround for a driveway. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 4-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioner a Special Use permit for a three -car garage. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 4-0. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN WL FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-54-V.90, ZBA-55-SU-90, CRAIG STEZSKAL LOCATION: 32 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD DATE: JULY 20, 1990 REQUEST The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14.3016 to permit a 60 foot diameter turn- around for a driveway. Under Code, 21 feet is the maximum diameter allowed for a driveway. The request also includes a Special Use permit for a three -car garage. VILLAGE STAEE COMMENTS Village staff note the following concerns: 1. The property must be subdivided into one lot of record. 2. Fifty (50) feet of public right-of-way must be dedicated along Busse Road. 3. Permission for driveway access to Busse Road must be obtained from the County. 4. Water is available on the west side of Busse Road. Sanitary sewer may need to be extended from Frediani Court, north and under Busse Road to reach this property. No storm sewers exist in this area. 5. Grading plans showing existing and proposed conditions on the site and within 100 feet of the property should be submitted with the building plans. PLANNING AND ZONING CONINTE.'s7S Mr. & Mrs. Sterskal hope to build a new house on the vacant lot at 32 South Busse Road. They filed the application to allow construction of a three -car garage and 60' diameter turn- around in the driveway. The property is substantially larger (43,556 sq. ft.) than the minimum 8,125 sq. ft. required. As a result, excessive setbacks are proposed. The proposed three -car garage will be located 20 feet from the property line and 36 feet from the nearest neighbor's house. As we find Page 2 ZBA-54-V-90, ZBA-55-SU-90 July 20, 1990 with the construction of many new homes, three -car garages are becoming more of a standard feature. The proposed garage should have no adverse effect on adjoining properties. The proposed driveway design will allow motorists to turn around, rather than backing out onto busy Busse Road. The large diameter of the turn -around is needed to accommodate maneuvering of vehicles. A 10 foot circular island- is located in the center of the turn- around to break up the paved area. A planted berm is proposed to screen the turn -around from the street. Based on the observed excessive size of the lot and its location on a busy arterial road, staff has no objections to the request. It should also be noted that lot coverage is not a factor with this large lot. NOW CAF/ 8/13/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 32 SO BUSSE ROAD WHEREAS, Craig K. and Despina Sterskal (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation and special use from provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 32 South Busse Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: The north 113.08 feet of that part of Lot "Ell in Kirchoff's Subdivision, being a subdivision of the northeast 1/4 of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, lying south of a line 565.39 feet north of and parallel with the south line of said northeast 1/4 of Section 10, in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14-3016 to permit a sixty foot (601) wide turnabout driveway, rather than the permitted 211, and a special use to permit a 3 -car garage; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 54-V-90 and 55 -SU -90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mgunt Prospect Herald on the 26th day of June, 1990; and WHEREASi the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a sixty foot (601) wide turnabout driveway and a special use to permit a 3 -car garage. SECTION THREE; Except for the variation and special use granted herein all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from N- ZBA 54-V-90 & 55 -SU -90 Page 2 of 2 and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk '1990. .........., VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-56-V-90, ANDREW E. CIABATTARI LOCATION: 112 NORTH EASTWOOD DATE: JULY 13, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application filed by Mr. Andrew Ciabattari of 112 North Eastwood Avenue. The application was filed to permit a 2 foot sideyard and a 15 foot height for a new garage. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows a 5 foot sideyard and 12 foot height for a detached garage. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Ciabattari presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that the requested 2 foot setback would be consistent with the existing garage, which will be removed, and with his neighbor's garage to the west. He stated that no maintenance or drainage problems occurred with his existing garage setback. He noted that a hedge along his neighbor's property to the north would screen the garage. He also indicated that his neighbors were aware of his proposal and had no objections. He stated that a 15 foot garage height would provide extra storage space. The additional height would be incorporated into the roof which will be barn -shaped with minimal overhangs. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting staff concerns with maintenance and drainage limitations in a 2 foot sideyard. The Zoning Board noted that no one objected to the request and that the 2 foot sideyard was consistent with other garages in the neighborhood. The Zoning Board found that maximizing the useable backyard area was a consideration, given the narrow, 55'-0" width of the lot. The Zoning Board also found that providing additional storage space in the garage is a legitimate request. Accordingly, by a 4-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approve a request for a 2 foot sideyard for a new garage at 112 North Eastwood Avenue; and by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that the Village Board approve a 15 foot height for a new detached garage at 112 North East Avenue. SUM, N 4ER ra-coo t 4, 5704> Z, -,v -r- a'004? ^er, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 56-V-90 Hearing Date: July 12, 1990 PETITIONER: Andrew Ciabattari SUBJECT PROPERTY: 112 North Eastwood PUBLICATION DATE: June 26, 1990, REQUEST: A variation is requested from Section 14.102.B.2 and 3 to permit a 2 foot sideyard instead of the required 5 foot and a 15 foot height instead of the allowed 12 foot for a detached garage. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this request and stated that the application was filed to reduce the 5 foot required sideyard for a detached garage to 2 feet and for a height variation to increase the 12 foot maximum height to 15 feet. Mr. Andrew Ciabattari introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he hopes to remove an existing one -car frame garage and construct a new two -car garage at the rear of his property. He stated that the existing garage exists with a 2 foot setback and he would like to construct the new garage with the same 2 foot setback. Mr. Ciabattari indicated that his lot is only 55 feet wide and that, if be constructed the new 24 foot wide garage at a 5 foot setback, the garage would then be located towards the middle of his lot, thereby reducing usable rear yard space. Concerning the building height, the petitioner indicated that he would like the increase height of the garage solely for storage purposes and that this would be for typical residential storage and not for any prohibited storage or home occupation. Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report and indicated that staff had no strong objections to the request, but noted that there was concern with the proposed 2 foot sideyard. Mr. Clements indicated that the staff would prefer to see a 3 foot sideyard, and that this would help allow more positive drainage around the structure on the petitioner's lot and would help for the ease of maintenance in the future of the structure. Mr. Clements noted that the staff also surveyed the neighborhood and determined that in this older area, there are many detached garages in rear yards that do not meet the current setback requirements. He also stated that the staff had no objections to the height variation provided that this area is used just for typical residential storage. ZBA-56-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and Chairman Basnik questioned the petitioner on the need for the two foot sideyard, and if the sideyard could be increased somewhat to meet the concerns of the staff. Mr. Ciabattari indicated that he did not share the concerns about the maintenance of the structure with a 2 foot sideyard and pointed to the existing one -car garage on his property with a 2 foot sideyard. He indicated that there had been no maintenance problems with this structure and he would not envision any such problems with the new garage with a similar 2 foot setback. n-tng a d h% discussed the request and it was noted that several other garages adjoining tb�o r urt r 1epetitioner's property are built on the same 2 foot setback and that the proposed variation would not be out of character with the area. Mrs. Skowron noted that this is a typical request in an older neighborhood, but believed maintenance could be a problem if there were some change in conditions in the neighborhood, such as a fence near the garage. She believed that a 3 foot presented a good compromise with this request. Mr. Brettrager pointed out that the eave overhanging the sideyard redi . ices the effect of the 2 foot sideyard even more. Mr. Lannon indicated that he believed a 2 foot sideyard was appropriate considering the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Basnik stated that he believed a 3 foot sideyard would be sufficient on this lot. After discussion, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of a 2 foot sideyard for a detached garage. The motion was seconded by M. Pratt. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Larmon, Pratt, and Basnik NAYS: Skowron Motion carried by a vote of 4-1. Chairman Basnik then asked for a motion on the height variation. Mrs. Skowron moved that the variation to permit a 15 foot high garage be approved. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, and Basnik NAYS: Skowron The motion carried by a vote of 5-0. These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, I M. cthwPvIk David M. Clements VHJAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT KANWG AM ZOMM DEPARTMMT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN - 174A C FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-56-V-90, ANDREW L CIABATTARI LOCATION: 112 NORTH EASTWOOD DATE: JULY 5, 19" The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14.102-8-2 to allow a 2 foot sideyard for an accessory building. The Code requires detached accessory buildings to maintain a minimum setback of 5 feet from any interior lot line. The petitioners also request a variation from Section 14.102.B3.b to allow a 15 foot high garage. The maximum height for a garage is 12 feet. VILLAfiE UAEE CQMMEMM Inspection Services believes that a 2 foot sideyard could create potential problems for maintenance purposes. If an easement is located on property, then the garage should not encroach on that easement No fill should be placed in the sideyard to alter drainage. Engineering notes that lot coverage will be about 41%. Grading plans should be submitted. Downspouts should be directed to the front or rear of the lot. RLAb2flNG AND ZONING COMMEN"IrS Mr. Ciabattari hopes to remove the existing garage, and construct a new garage at 112 North Eastwood. The proposed location of the new garage is 2 feet from the side lot line which is consistent with the existing garage setback. Staff notes that several other accessory buildings in the neighborhood also encroach on sideyards. Staff is concerned with drainage and maintenance access within such a small setback and suggests that providing a 3 foot setback would help alleviate thew potential problems. In addition, 3 feet represents a variation of less than 50% of the ordinance requirement. This is an important consideration in terms of setting precedent and maintaining the intent of the setback standard. Page 2 ZBA 56-V-90 July 5, 1990 With regard to the request for a 15 foot garage height, staff does not object to this variance for the purposes of providing additional storage space. However, this additional space should not be used as living space. Staff also notes that a 12'-15' dense hedge along the neighbor's property line will screen the new garage. Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the height variance request, and a sideyard setback of 3 feet rather than the 5 feet required. DMC:hg CAF/ 8/13/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 112 NORTH EASTWOO WHEREAS, Andrew E. Ciabattari (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 112 North Eastwood (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 5 in Block 18 in Prospect Manor, being a Subdivision of part of the south 3/4 of the West half of the West half of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, cook County, Illinois; and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.B.2 to permit a side yard setback of two feet (2') instead of the required 51 in order to replace an existing garage and a variation from Section 14.102.B.3 to permit a height of fifteen feet (151) for the proposed replacement garage, rather than the permitted 121; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 56-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 12th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 26th day of June, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 56-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102-B.2 to permit a side yard setback of two feet (21) in order to replace an existing garage and a variation from Section 14.102.B.3 to permit a garage height of fifteen feet (151). SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein N ZBA 56-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk `VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER %9—' FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-57-V-90, CLARENCE AND MARILYN SCHOLLA LOCATION: 20 AUDREY LANE DATE: JULY 12, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for variances filed by Mr. Clarence Scholla of 20 Audrey lane. The application was filed to permit an 18" sideyard setback for a parking apron and to permit a 30 foot driveway at the widest point of the apron. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows an 8.2 foot sideyard and a 15 foot driveway for a one -car garage. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting Mrs. Scholia presented testimony in support of the request. She stated that their camping trailer is currently parked on a gravel parking pad. The proposed paved parking pad would be in the same location. She indicated that the neighbors did not object to the request. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that paving the parking pad would have aesthetic and maintenance advantages. They also noted that only the remainder of the driveway would be 9'-6" wide, which is permitted. The Zoning Board found that no one objected to the request and that the proposed parking pad would not adversely impact the neighborhood. Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approve the request for an 18" sideyard and 30 foot driveway width to accommodate a parking pad at 20 Audrey Lane. DMC:hg MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT! ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 57-V-90 Hearing Date: July 12, 1990 PETITIONER: Clarence Scholla SUBJECT PROPERTY: 20 Audrey Lane PUBLICATION DATE: June 26, 1990 REQUEST: Variations are requested from the following sections of the Zoning Code: 1. Section 14.1102 to permit an 18" sideyard setback for a parking apron instead of 87 as required by Code. 2. Section 14.3016 to allow a 30 foot drive at -the widest point instead of the maximum 15 foot allowed by Code. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced the request and stated that the application was filed for variations of the permitted driveway width to allow a 30 foot driveway at its widest point and an 18" sideyard. Mr. & Mrs. Scholla addressed the Zoning Board and stated that they have an existing asphalt driveway that is deteriorated and that they would like to replace the entire driveway with a new asphalt drive. They noted that there is an existing gravel parking apron at the end of the driveway near a detached garage and that this area is used for their small recreational vehicle. They indicated that at this time they would like to pave this parking area while they are replacing the existing driveway. Mr. Scholla stated that this area had never been paved, and that the variation is necessary for this pavement width. Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and indicated that the proposed driveway is 30 feet at its widest point, that area being the lcoation of the parking apron near the end, of the driveway. Mr. Clements noted that most of the driveway is a 9 foot driveway leading up to the detached garage. Mr. Clements stated that the area in question is presently a gravel parking area and that, for several reasons, paving this location ZBA-57-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 may be more attractive and might better control the stormwater run-off than the existing gravel surface. He also noted that the staff had found, in this neighborhood, several other parking pads in rear yards near detached garages, and that this proposal would not be out of character with the area. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was noted that the request for the variation is merely to upgrade the property and to provide paving for an existing gravel area, and that this would be more attractive for the adjoining property than the existing gravel parking apron. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of a 30 foot wide driveway for a parking apron and a reduced sideyard for the property at 20 Audrey Lane. The motion was seconded by Mr. on. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, David M. Clements MLA.GE OF MOUNT" PROSP PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARThffN " Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN T2.wt L' FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-57-V-90, CLARENCE AND MARILYN SCHOLLA LOCATION: 20 AUDREY LANE DATE: JULY 5, 1990 The applicants request a variation from Section 14.1102 to permit an 18" sideyard for a parking apron. The current regulations require 8.2 ft. (10% of lot width) sideyard. The petitioners also request a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a 30 foot driveway at the widest point of the apron. The maximum width allowed under Code is 15 feet for a one - car garage. The drainage pattern is toward the existing garage. Inspection Services suggests that the new drive should be built at or below existing grade so as not to alter drainage. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS Mr. and Mrs. Scholia are requesting permission to pave a parking apron for their camping trailer. The trailer is currently parked on a gravel pad of approximately the same size and in the same location as the proposed pad. The neighbor's home is set back 10 feet from the property line, or 11'-6" from the proposed parking pad. The addition of the parking apron requires a portion of the driveway to be wider than the 15 foot maximum width allowed under Code. The requested variance to allow a 30 foot width only pertains to the parking apron area. The remainder of the driveway will be 9'- 6" wide which is permitted. Given the fact that the trader has previously been parked in the proposed parking pad location, any additional impact on the neighbors will be minimal In fact, replacing the existing gravel pad with permanent pavement might be beneficial in terms of eliminating the potential drift of loose gravel onto the neighbor's lawn. Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the request. DMC:hg CAF/ 8/13/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY WHEREAS, Clarence and Marilyn Scholla (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 20 Audrey Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 10 in Hatlen Heights Unit No. 3, a Subdivision of part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek variations from Section 14.1102 to permit a side yard setback of eighteen inches (1811) instead of the required 8' 211 and a variation from Section 14.3016 to permit a thirty foot (301) wide driveway at the widest point to permit a parking pad; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 57-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 12th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the N-gunt Prosngct Herald on the 26th day of June, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 57-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. 5-EgTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to permit a driveway width of thirty feet (301) at the widest point and a variation from Section 14.1102 to permit a side yard setback of eighteen inches (1811) for the purpose of providing a parking pad. 5 M91ION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. UCTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein N ZBA 57-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-58-V-90, THOMAS AND MARY KAY DETERMANN LOCATION: 613 NORTH RUSSEL DATE: JULY 16, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for variances filed by Mr. Thomas Determann of 613 North Russel Street. The application was filed to permit a 16.5 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage and a 2.5 foot sideyard setback for a parking pad. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows a 15 foot driveway and a 6 foot sideyard setback. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Determann presented testimony in support of the request. He stated that his current driveway is only it feet wide and cannot accommodate the family's three vehicles. Mr. Brian Soltys, representing his father Frank J. Soltys of 615 North Russel Street, stated that a 16.5 foot driveway would not be objectionable and is consistent with other driveways on the block. However, he expressed concern about the aesthetics, since the existing shrubs in Mr. Determann's sideyard would have to be removed to make room for the parking pad. Mr. Determann and Mr. Soltys agreed to negotiate on this issue and work out final details prior to the Village Board meeting on August 7, 1990. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that similar driveway widths and parking pads are present in the neighborhood. The Zoning Board confirmed that all drainage would be toward the street and not onto adjoining property. According, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that the Village Board approve the request for a 16.5 foot wide driveway and a 2.5 foot sideyard setback for a parking pad at 613 North Russel Street. DMC:hg LOT 11 IN $LOCK 0 IN "NOVIW HI.... E 01CINfi A S11lDIYISIp11 AE THE NORTH 11ES1 1/4 016 THE NORTH NES1`, U+'',` NORTH EAST 1/4 OF THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SECTION 349 TOWNSHIP 4t&w,t1WIle`RAHGE 11 CAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MEf►IOIAN$ IN C00 ., ... y xGtpqx4w L* .. ,Dour: rrt>Mrr LOT to � t k! 13L55 auas t atrt t ol lot -. W St81e tf 1Mlete�la � w°+w.wri Com "r N Cook JENS K. DOE SURVEY SERVICE. INC. does hereby certify that a surroy ha been made under NOTE its direction. by a Registered Illinois Lend Serwya of the property described hereon and that the " ¢ Ja" 11181 hereon drawn is a correct representation of said suety. ow" am Rot to M "Mawd at wolrit. +i: •ie, nlinaa Doled I& TH da .f A L 90 y +ndMtlsax +aaor! ares ttrN stat is a ager of � ^ ••. • t for rrareaar MUST be arr+wearrM JENS K. DOE SURVEY SERVICE. INC er tw,WuaLe «rwrrrrtirra ratan ua rewr r .,•wr arrirrrrarr THOMASI.fOpK044 ent � ':;N: 1a•�•.• MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF TTIE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 58-V-90 Hearing Date: July 12, 1990 PETMONER: nomas Determann' SUBJECT PROPERTY: 613 North Russet PUBLICATION DATE,: June 26, 1990 REQUEST: Variations are requested from the following: 1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 16 1/2 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage instead of the maximum allowed 15 foot. 2. Section 14.1102.13.1 to permit a 2 1/2 foot sideyard setback for a parking pad instead of the required 6 foot. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Brian Soltys Chairman Basnik introduced the request and stated that this application was filed to increase the permitted driveway width for a one -car garage to 161/2 feet and to reduce the required sideyard to 2 1/2 feet for purposes of a parking apron at this location. Mr. Determann introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he presently has a narrow one -car driveway leading to a one -car garage and would like to expand the driveway to a dimension sufficient for parking two of the three automobiles in the family. He stated that the wider driveway would be a convenience and would not require maneuvering cars in and out of the driveway and garage and provide a better parking situation on this lot for his family. Mr. Clements summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and indicated that the staff report erroneously stated that a 21 foot driveway was proposed and that the exact request is for a 161/2 foot driveway. Mr. Clements stated that he had mis-interpreted a dimension on the survey and that the 16 1/2 foot driveway was the actual requesL Mr. Clements stated that the staff had reviewed the subject property and neighborhood, and found that along ZBA-58-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 2 North Russel Street, there are a number of existing homes with one -car garages with wider driveways that serve as a parking apron. Accordingly, the request would not be out of character with the neighborhood. Mr. Brian Soltys introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he is representing his father who lives in the home next door. He stated that he was concerned if three existing bushes at the comer of the house would be removed, and suggested that those remain. Mr. Determann stated that to construct the parking apron near the garage, would require the removal of the bushes, and that he did not believe they could be saved and still install the parking apron in the proposed location. Mr. Basnik suggested that Mr. Determarm and Mr. Soltys' father get together to discuss their request and noted that the 16 1/2 foot driveway was not an excessive variation, and hoped that Mr. Determann could show his property survey to Mr. Soltys to relieve any concerns he might have with the variation. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and, as with similar applications, noted that the parking apron would not be out of character with the neighborhood, and stated that the stormwater drainage would be directed towards the street and not at an adjoining property. After discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of a 161/2 foot driveway and a reduced sideyard at 613 North Russel Street The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, . . uhn� David M. Clements VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID X CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT. ZBA-S&V-90, THOMAS AND MARY KAY DETERMANN LOCATION- 613 NORTH RUSSEL DATE: JULY S, 1990 REO The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14-3016.A.3 to increase the driveway width to 21 feet. Maximum width for driveways for one -car garages is 15 feet. A second variation is requested from Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 2.5 foot sideyard. Under Code, any interior side yard must be 10% of lot width or 10 feet, whichever is less. 39LLAGE STAff COMMNTS Engineering indicates that there is an existing downspout on the north side of the residence at the front. This downspout should be directed to the front of the house so that drainage will not be altered by construction. Inspection Services suggests that the driveway be tapered at the private property side of the sidewalk to the width of the existing driveway approach. The driveway approach should not be greater than 15 feet. Also, the driveway must be built at or below existing grade so as not to alter drainage. PLAMON AbW ZONING COMEMM The applicants would like to widen their existing 15 foot driveway by 6' feet. A 21 foot driveway is needed to accommodate the family's three cars, which do not adequately fit in the existing driveway. Staff notes that several neighboring residences have installed wide driveways for one -car garages. Staff concurs with the suggestion by Inspection Services that the driveway approach remain 15 feet wide. Maintaining the existing driveway approach width would be consistent with neighboring driveways. Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the request. DMC:hg CAF/ 8/13/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 613 NORTH RU5SEL WHEREAS, Thomas and Mary Kay Determann (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 613 North Russel (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 18 in Block 14 in Randview Highlands, being a Subdivision of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 and the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek variations from Section 14.1102.B.1 to permit a side yard setback of two feet 6 inches (21 611) instead of the required 61 and a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to permit a sixteen and one-half (16.51) foot wide driveway in order to provide for a parking pad; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 58-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 12th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prosp-g-ct Hgrald on the 26th day of June, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 58-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: 5ECTION ON ', The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to permit a driveway width of sixteen and one-half feet (16.51) and a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 to permit a side yard setback of two feet six inches (21 611) for the purpose of providing a parking pad. UCTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION EQUE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein ZBA 58-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: .JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WA' (- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND DNING SUBJECT: ZBA-59-V-90, MICHAEL KAUTZ LOCATION: 730 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY DATE: JULY 16, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on an application for variances filed by Mr. Kautz and William Annen of 730 East Northwest Highway. The application was filed to allow: 1. A zero foot front yard. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 30 foot front yard. 2. A zero foot sideyard. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 10.foot sideyard; 3. Zero foot perimeter yards for parking. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 10 foot parking setback; 4. 100% lot surface coverage. Mount Prospect Ordinance allows 75% lot coverage. 5. Ten parking spaces. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires 21 spaces. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting, Mike Kautz presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Kautz stated that the building addition was needed to provide additional storage space. He indicated that his business didn't generate a large parking demand and that the 10 spaces requested plus three existing on -street spaces would be more than adequate to meet normal demand. He further acknowledged that he had negotiated a sideyard setback compromise with the adjacent property owner, Mr. Vic Faraci of 770 East Northwest Highway. They agreed that a 2.5 foot setback would alleviate Mr. Faraci's original concerns about light and air circulation between buildings. Mr. Faraci was at the meeting and expressed no objection to a 2.5 foot setback. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and found that a zero foot front yard setbacks are very common in commercial areas along Northwest Highway. They also acknowledged the limited parking demand associated with Mr. Kau&s business and that the current lot coverage is 100%. Accordingly, by a vote of 5-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board approve a request for a zero foot front yard, 2.5 foot sideyard, zero perimeter yards for parking, 100% lot coverage, and 10 parking spaces at 730 East Northwest Highway. Li r 1 ]1 ( � esoo o• � � - 7 j3 [ �r '* PitoP�sf.��a Avt�rq�l zi�ao n' t ASST, �U ) �LQOD{Uf. {UUl4MD1Mi A�sA.. _ _ MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 59-V-90 Hearing Date: July 12, 1990 PETITIONER: Michael Kautz SUBJECT PROPERTY: 730 East Northwest Highway PUBLICATION DATE: June 26, 1990 REQUEST: The applicant is proposing to construct a commercial addition resulting in a request for variations from the following Sections of the Code: 1. Section 14.2002.A to permit a zero foot front yard instead of the required 30 feet. 2. Section 14.2002.13 to permit a zero foot side yard instead of the required 10 foot. 3. Section 14.2002.13 to permit zero -perimeter yards for parking. 4. Section 14.3012 to allow 10 parking spaces instead of the required 21 spaces. 5. Section 14.2003 to allow 100% lot surface coverage rather than the required 75%. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Vic Faraci, 770 E. Northwest Highway Chairman Basnik introduced the request to the Zoning Board and stated that the application was filed for a number of variations to allow the construction of a commercial addition for Kautz Carpets at. 730 East Northwest Highway. Mr. Michael Kautz introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he had filed the application to allow the construction of an addition at his business to serve as additional storage area. He noted that he presently has some storage in an old trailer behind the building, and that this proposed addition would allow centralized storage and would better serve his needs and allow for the future growth of his business. He noted that the request includes a reduction of a 10 foot required sideyard to a zero foot sideyard and a parking variation to allow 10 off-street spaces rather than 21. Concerning the parking variation, Mr. Kautz noted that his customer demand is not as high ZBA-59-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 2 of 4 as the 21 spaces that would be required of the Zoning Ordinance. He indicated that in his business he typically had 3 or 4 customers per day on a weekday, and then on a weekend there are 8 to 10 customers per day. Mr. Kautz noted that there is on -street parking along Northwest Highway and that the 10 spaces proposed behind the building would be sufficient for all his employee and customer needs. Concerning the sideyard reduction, Mr. Kautz noted that the proposed addition is to be constructed in an area that is presently an access driVe.to the rear of his property, and that the dimension of this driveway is 10 feet, and he would like to construct the addition over this entire driveway width. He stated that the 10 foot dimension is necessary to allow proper working space: and storage inside the room addition, and that it would be very difficult to reduce the size of the addition and meet his needs, if he had to meet he 10 foot required sideyard. However, Mr. Kautz stated that he understood the concerns about the reduced sideyard addressed in the staff repoM and that he had a discussion with the adjoining property owner at 770 East Northwest Highway, Mr. Faraci. Mr. Kautz noted that be, at this time, would like to modify his request to allow a 2 1/2 foot sideyard and that this 2 1/2 foot dimension would still permit him adequate storage area in the addition, and would allow a sufficient amount of light and air to the property at 770 East Northwest Highway. Mr. Clements then summarized the staffreport for the Zoning Boar I d and stated that there were five variations with the request. He indicated that the first was for a zero foot front yard rather than 30 feet Mr. Clements noted that many buildings along Northwest Highway are constructed right at the front property line near the sidewalk and that the proposed addition would be in character with the area, and would have no detrimental impact on the line of stores along Northwest Highway. However, Mr. Clements stated he was concerned with the original sideyard reduction to a zero foot yard. Mr. Clements noted that the adjoining property of 770 East Northwest Highway bad seven office windows and four air conditioning units in the side yard between the structures and that the zero foot sideyard would adversely effect light, air and perhaps maintenance to this buildin& Mr. Clements indicated that he was pleased with the compromise to allow a 2 1/2 foot sideyard, but that the staff would recommend a 5 foot sideyard to better allow open space between the structures and to reduce the amount of variation in precedent with this request. Next, Mr. Clements discussed the zero foot parking lot setbacks. He stated that this variation is a function of the lot width and that this merely reflects existing conditions on the property. He stated that, with the new commercial addition, parking spaces would be striped to meet proper space dimensions and maneuvering dimensions and that these required parking space sizes would not leave any remaining areae for conforming setbacks. He also noted that the petition included a variation to allow 100% lot coverage. Mr. Clements noted that the property currently has a 100% lot coverage and that the proposed addition would merely be going on an area that is presently occupied by a driveway, thtrefore, there would be no increase in lot coverage or stormwater run-off with the request. Next, Mr. Clements discussed the parking variation. He stated that staff was concerned with reducing the 21 space requirement for this property to 10 spaces. Mr. Clements acknowledged that the retail carpet business may be a low volume operation in terms of ZBA-59-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 3 of 4 customer demand, but that he was concerned that putting the commercial addition in the location of the driveway would be cutting off all customer access to the parking spaces behind the building and thus only leaving on -street parking on Northwest Highway. Mr. Clements noted that the parking variation is important, but that also it is perhaps more significant in that customers of the business would, not have direct access from Northwest Highway to those remaining parking spaces behind the building. Mr. Clements stated that any future use of the building might, have a higher demand for parking, and that he indicated that there should bea close examination of the parking variation and its impact and precedence. Mr. Vic Faraci introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he is an attorney with offices at 770 East Northwest Highway and part owner of the adjoining building. He concurred with Mr. Kautz in the 2 1/2 foot sideyard and indicated that a 2 1/2 foot setback from the property line would be sufficient for light and air into the office windows in this building, and that there would be sufficient area for .maintenance of the air conditioning units. He also indicated that there very rarely is any customer traffic "in the driveways between the buildings, and stated his office looks out on this driveway and that, to some extent, he would prefer to see the commercial addition rather than a driveway. The Zoning Board of Appeals then generally discussed the request and it was noted that the zero foot front yard would not be out of character with existing conditions on Northwest Highway and that there was no objection to having the commercial addition come out to the front lot line at the sidewalk. The Zoning Board then discussed the request for a 2 1/2 foot sideyard and were pleased that the petitioner had eliminated the variation for a zero foot yard and had found a compromise position that was acceptable to the adjoining property owner. The Zoning Board believed a 2 1/2 foot sideyard would be sufficient setback for the addition and would not have any adverse impact on the adjoining properties. The Zoning Board then discussed the parking variation and there was considerable discussion about customer demand for this business and access to the rear of the lot. Mr. Pratt asked if three parking spaces on -street would be sufficient for Kautz Carpets, and if employees parked at the rear of the building, and if all deliveries were made in the rear, Mr. Kautz indicated that he and his employees park at the rear of the building and that all deliveries are made to the rear of the structure, Mr. Kautz noted that the addition would be providing a loading and unloading area that would better define the delivery location in his parking lot. Mr. Basnik stated that he believed Mr. Kautz had sufficiently examined the customer demand at his business and that the 10 spaces behind the building would be sufficient. Mr. Lannon acknowledged Mr. Clements' remarks about the commercial addition being placed over the driveway and eliminating customer access to the remaining spaces behind the building. However, Mr. Lannon noted that many businesses along Northwest Highway do not have driveways to rear parking and that this would not be out of character with other businesses. Mr. Clements noted that most such situations were small retailers in 25 foot storefronts that did not have direct driveway access to rear parking, and that most of the larger users along Northwest Highway, such. as, Novak 8c Parker and the Prospect Bike Shop would have direct access via a driveway to off-street parking. Mr. Clements stated that ZBA-59-V-90 July 12, 1990 Page 4 of 4 Kautz Carpets would be a large user without any direct and reasonable access to the customer parking. However, Mr. Clements did note that there is an existing alley that would be sufficient for customer uses if individuals were aware that it provided access to parking. Mr. Brettrager asked if there would be a rear customer entrance and Mr. Kautz stated that there would be a customer entrance at the rear of the building. Mr. Basnik stated that Mbunt Prospect needs to be flexible to keep such businesses in the Central Business District and that certain variations have to be addressed and justified in order to allow expansion of existing businesses. He stated he had no objection to the request. Mr. Kautz also pointed out that he had participated in the Facade Program and that he would continue the facade design onto the front elevation of the proposed addition. Mrs. Skowron noted that� while she supported the expansion of local businesses, at some point there could be a change of ownership in the property, and she was concerned that the parking variation and reducing the access to the rear lot, could have some adverse impact on future users of the property. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that there was sufficient on -street parking for most of Mr. Kautz' day to day customer needs, and that constructing the room addition over the driveway would not adversely impact his business or any future users of the property. The Zoning Board also believed it was important that he had negotiated a compromise with the adjoining property owner concerning the 2 1/2 foot sideyard. Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of variations at Kautz Carpets to permit a zero foot front yard instead of 30 feet, a 21 / foot sideyard instead of 10 feet, a zero foot perimeter parking setbacks at the rear of the property, a variation to reduce the required 21 parking spaces to 10 spaces and a variation to allow, 100% lot coverage rather than 759o'. 71e motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 5-0. This recommendation wM be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Respectfully submitted, Davi M. Clements TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOA" OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZZO✓NING SUBJECT: ZHA-9-V.94,, MICHAEL KAUTZ LOCATION: 730 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY DATE: MY 6, 19" The petitioner requests- the following variations: 1. A variation from Section 14.2002 to allow a zero foot front yard. A 30 foot front yard is required. 2. A variation from Section 14.2002 to permit a zero foot side yard. A10foot side yard is required. 3. A variation from Section 14Z02 to allow zero foot setbacks for parking. 4. A variation from Section 142003 to allow 100% lot coverage. The Code permits 75% lot coverage. 5. A variation from Section 14.3012 to allow 10 off-street parking spaces- Currently, the required number of spaces is 21. The Village Clerk notes that the lot must be subdivided into one lot of record. Inspection Services maefts that the existing; exit to Northwest Highway should be removed and the depressed curb should be replaced with barrier curb. This work will require an Illinois Department of Transportation permit. A grading plan showing existing and proposed conditions should be submitted. Also, the existing building may require modifications to comply with all building codes. Engineering notes that drainage is from back to front and the storm sewer may have to be adjusted. Drainage between buildings could be a problem if a zero foot lot line is allowed. There is no curb around the parking aced and access is from the alley. The zero foot lot line request should not be permitted because of footings. Page 2 July b, 1990 ZBA 551-'V-90 PIANISNG AND ZONING COMME The petitioner would like to construct a 1,900 square foot addition to the existing 3,300 square foot building. The addition would serve primarily as storage space. It should be noted that the addition would allow for the removal of a trailer in the rear parking lot that has been used for storage for some time. Staff offers.the following comments on the individual variations: 1. ReQuol to reduce a 2Q foot front AW to a ZCro fQgt yUd. This area along Northwest Highway is characterized by many buildings constructed at the front lot line. The petitioner's existing building is constructed at no setback, so the addition is designed to meet the existing building. Staff has no objection to the front yard variation, primarily based on the character of this commercial area. 2• In order to storage space, the petitioner would like to construct the addition to the east lot line, fully closing off the driveway to the rear parking lot from Northwest Highway. Staff has the following concerns: a.) The adjacent pr6ftfTat nO East Northwest Highway is constracted at an approximate 4 foot setback. Along this building elevation are eight office windows and four air conditioning units. The proposed addition at a zero foot setback would reduce light to office windows at 770 East Northwest Highway, and might adversely effect air circulation for the air conditioning units. The reduced setback would also make maintenance difficult for both buildings. Also, because of width necessary for footings, a zero foot setback is not workable. Staff recommends a 5 foot setback be maintained along the side lot line. Ibis will increase the separation between the buildingN and provide more light and air at 770 East Northwest Highway. Stasi` recommends this 5 foot setback be landscaped. It should be noted that this recommendation would require a redesign of the petitioner's loading area. b.) The reduced sideyard would prohibit access from Northwest Highway to the rear parking lot. Access could be obtained from the alley at the rear of the property. This would be sufficient for delivery vehicles. However, closing the driveway would be an inconvenience to customers as they would not have direct access to the parking lot. The petitioner should addreu this Comm to allow zero fQgl Darking setbacks, The redesign and striping of the parking is proposed to be at a ;sero foot setback. This is an existing condition. Inasmuch as this area is needed for proper space and aisle dimensions, staff' has no objections. Page 3 July 6, 1990 ZBA-59-V-90 4. Variation to allow loQ% lot C=raa. The paving and building presently total 100%. The proposed addition merely replaces paved area, so there is no increase in lot coverage. The recommendation to increase the sideyard to 5 feet reduces the lot coverage to 96%. 4 0 0 VvT4 M, MW 1777B Also, it should be noted that space # 10 on the site plan should be - eliminated. Maneuvering of trucks from the alley into the loading area makes space #10 undesirable for parking. DMC:h$ -- . - , ._,.<-.-,, !PaPA 4Uoj3 (,0) 4003 Olaz 9 qTmlad 04 Y-ZOOZ-VT UOT409S MOaJ UOTqPTJPA V • T aq4 Aqj9dojd 4oaCqns aqq o4 4ueab Aqejaq goad :bUTMOTTOJ SOJd 4UnOI4 go 9bPTTTA aq4 go S994snll 90 PjPO9 PUP 4uapTsaid aql -OMI —NOIlDaS -qoadsOJd 4unOW JO 969TTTA 9q4 90 saa4snal go papog Pus 4u8PTs9jd aq4 Aq qoeg JO SbUTPUT; SP UTaJ9q paqeaodjoOUT 91P 9AoqpUTOJ9q qqaOj 49s sTP4TO9J 9ql* iaNO NOil-D—aS :SIONIUUI 'Aimnoo m000 'ioadSOHd INnOK dO aDVqqIA alll dO saaisnai dO GHYO9 UNY LNaGlSaUd alll Ala GaNIYCRIO II aq 'aHOdHHHHI 'MON 'SUOTqPTIPA PTPS bUTquPjb Aq paAias aq PTnom qoedsO-Td _4UnOW JO 9J5eTT*TA'9q-4 go s-4Sq*jq-4UT 4seq aqq 4vq4 pauTmia4ap qApq pup 06-A-69 Y9Z go 4oa[qns 9q4 bUT9' q SUOT4eTaeA 9q4 04 uOT49japTsuoo jaq4an3 UOAT6 aAPq abRTTTA 9q4 90 saaqsnal go paeos Pus 4u9PTsOld 9q4 Pup 409asOld 4unOW 90 06PTTTA aqq go saa4snal 90 PIPOS -Pus 4UOPTseld 8q4 04 UOTqePU9uimooaa pup SbUTPUTJ s4T Pa44Tuiqns seg sleaddy go PIP09 bUTUOZ 944 'svaHaHM PUP !066T '9Unf 90 Asp q49Z 944 UO oad aq-4 uT paqsTTqnd 90al9q4 9OT40U aadoad pup anp o4 4upnsind '066T 'ATnf go APP q4ZT aq4 uo 4oadsoad 4unoW go ObeTTTA 9q4 go sTeaddv go PJeO9 bUTUOZ a,44 ajogaq 06-A-69 -ON 9sPO YqZ go 4oa[qns Oq4 bUTaq pa4sanbaj SUOT4PTJQA 9q-4 UO plaq sem bUT-IPE)lq OTTc�nd -e ISVazi' HHM PUP !%GL p9lTnbea aqq up jaq4pj '9bPa9AOO aosgins 40T %OOT MOTTP 04 COOZ'VT UOT4oas 'pup !seoeds TZ p9JTnbaa qq4 go PE94SUT lsaopds bUT3(aed OT mOTTe 04 ZTOE'VT UOT409S .'BUTXapd jog SPJPA a9491UTiad ojaz qTmied o4 H-ZOOZ-VT UOT409S !,OT p9jTnb9j aqq JO PP94SUT ; PJeA qPTS ('0) 4003 Oaqz P 4TUlle'd 04 S*Z00Z . VT UOT40aS ',OC pe-TTnbea 8q4 JO PPa4SUT 'PleA 4uOJ3 (,0) 4009 olaz P qTuiaad 0*4 YIZOOZ-VT UOT-409S MOIJ SUOT-4PT.TPA 3[99S S19UOT4T49d 'SVH*daHM PUP STOUTIJI 'Aqunoo NooD UT uQTPTJ9H TPdTouTjd PJTqJ 9qq 90 4SPa 'TT abueld 'qqjoN T dT SUMOI 'Z U T -409S Tip .14 T 0. 30 Z/T 4SPH 9T44 UT lqoadsO-ld 4UnON 04 UOT4TPPY U194sPa s CZ 31DOT2 CT Pus ZT ;assnq UT UT s4Oq PUP ZZ XDOT9 UT '9ATsnTOUT T4 -40q '6T 0-4 ZT S4OrI PUP TZ X3OT9 UT L 40q go UOTSTATpqnsad UT SC PUP LE s4Oq go UOTSTATpqnsa-d s iq-49bo4 'STOUTTTI . . . ,J8UMO UT sayst 4OrI lq4Tm ja 'Aqunoo XooD uT 'UPTPTJ9K TPdT0UTJd PJTqJ aqq JO 4SPa 'TT E&UPH 'Ll-4JON T'lv dTtiSUMOI 'ZT UOi4oas ;'0 Z/T 4SPH 9q4 UT '4oadsOJd 4unoN o4 uoT4Tppy uja4spa s,assnq UT CZ 4001.9 UT CT Pus ZT S40q PUP ZZ X0OT9 UT '9ATsnTOUT 144oq '6T 04 ZT s4OrI Pup TZ XooTq UT L 40q JO UOTSrATpqnsaa UT 9C 4OrJ :se paqTjosap ATTPb9T '(AqjadOld qoaEqns ss oq pajaegai J943PUT9J9q) APMqbTH qS9Mq4JON 4SSa OCL ss umoux ATuoumoo Aqjadoid IOJ 'sTOuTTTI l4oadsoad 4unoN go 9POD 96PTTTA 9q4 90 VT ja4dPqo MOJJ SUOT4PTIPA JOJ UOT4POTTdde up palT; aAPq (SJ9UOT4T40d ss 04 PaJJa39J a9q3PUT&J9Tq) U9UUV 'N mPTTTTM PUP z4nPX T9PqDTN 'SVadaHM AVMH!DIH IS M 0 S OCL SV NM NX Z) AlHadOHd UOJ SNOIIYIUYA DNIINVU0 aDNYNIGUO NY ,ON aDNVNIGHO 06/CT/8 /Jvz) ZBA 59-V-90 Page 2 of 2 2. A variation from Section 14.2002.B to permit a two and one- half foot (2.51) side yard; 3. A variation from Section 14.2002.E to permit zero perimeter yards for parking; 4. A variation from Section 14.3012 to allow 10 parking spaces; and 5. A variation from Section 14.2003 to allow 100% lot surface coverage. All as set forth on the Site Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other applicable village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect fron and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet forn in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk PYLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-61-V-90, GRANT LAWRENCE LOCATION: 802 DRESSER DRIVE DATE: JULY 27, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on an application filed by Grant Lawrence. The application affects the property at 802 Dresser Drive, and was filed to allow a variance from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 3'-6" sideyard instead of the required 7.2 foot sideyard. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting Mr. Lawrence presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that he was replacing an old concrete patio with a brick patio. The size and location of the new patio would be identical to the former patio. Brick paving would enhance the aesthetics of the patio. In addition, the patio is screened from the neighbors by an 8'-10' hedge. He also referenced a petition submitted and signed by 48 neighbors stating their support for the request. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that the size and location of the new patio is identical to the old patio. They also acknowledged the petition in favor of the request and the improved aesthetics of the brick paving. Accordingly, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a 3'-6' sideyard at 802 Dresser Drive to accommodate a new patio. ,.. '0 1w • 7754 CUT 77PLAT OF SURVEY itQill7$AS,ttFt511ti0fn�s• s'k'tf�tf'.I sF [ttt<•7Y,f} iil T'.tt'd!£tI ACAs it" 2 P£SF!; ' su. nINSS:OM OF Til£ !t£S: 7 f.. ACJ:LLtt. l btib ' s' c :iii THIAtt i",It++`IPAt. ti£Rli)J M. Ii+ Ci?t9Y CMINTY?Fs.S -CT ION it. i0.'I:tti:F AI PgiTlty I tittI S. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 61-V-90 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: July 26, 1990 Grant Lawrence 802 Dresser Drive July 10, 1990 Variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 to permit a a 3'- 6" sideyard for a patio. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Michaele Skowron Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a variance from Section 14.1102.B.1 to permit a 3'-6" sideyard for a patio. The petitioner, Grant Lawrence of 802 Dresser Drive, presented his case stating that he wanted to replace a patio in the sideyard and did not realize that he could not replace it exactly where it was without having to get a variation. Mr. Lawrence continued by stating he has replaced part of the patio that did not need a variance for with paver bricks and would like to complete the job. Mr. Lawrence then presented the Board with a petition with 48 names of neighbors who so not object to the patio. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the replacement of the patio would have no impact on surrounding neighbors and has no objection to the request. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a variance for a 3'-6" sideyard. Mr. Pratt moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik NAYS: None ZBA-61-V-90 July 26, 1990 Page 2 of 2 Motion carried by a vote of 4-0. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNII, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-61-V-90, GRANT LAWRENCE LOCATION. 802 DRESSER DRIVE DATE: JULY 19, I"o REQ= The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 14.1102.8.1 to permit a 3'-6" sideyard for a patio. The Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 7.2 foot sideyard for this lot (10% of lot width). SIT STAEE CQ NTT' Engineering requests that a separate grading plan be submitted if the existing patio grade is changed during replacement Inspection Services requests that no fill be placed in the sideyard that will alter existing drainage patterns. Permits are required prior to construction. PLAM[ING AND ZONING COMMEMM Mr. Lawrence is requesting permission to replace an old patio that extended to 3'-6" of the property line. The new patio will be the same size as the old patio. A 6'-8' hedge exists along the property line, screening the patio area from the neighbors. Given the fact that the new patio will be the same size and in the same location as the old patio, any additional impact on the neighbors will be minimal. The old patio has been removed, and new brick paving has been laid in the portion of the patio within the required setbacks. The new brick paving is very neat and attractive. Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the request DMC:hg CAF/ 8/13/90 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 802 DRESSER DRIVE WHEREAS, Grant H. Lawrence (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 802 Dresser Drive (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 77 in Town Development Company's We -Go Park Unit No. 2 being a Subdivision of the West 1/2 of the Northeast fractional 1/4 and the East 1/2 of the Northwest fractional 1/4 of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal meridian, in Cook County, Illinois, together with Lot "All in Owner's Resubdivision of Lots 37 and 38 in Resubdivision of Lot 7 in Block 21 and Lots 12 to 19, both inclusive, in Block 22 and Lots 12 and 13 in Block 23 in Busse's Eastern Addition to Mount Prospect, in the East 1/2 of Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 to permit a three foot six inch (31 611) side yard, instead of the required 7.2, in order to replace an existing patio; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 61-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prosoect Herald on the 10th day of July, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 61-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 to permit a side yard setback of three feet six inch (31 611) for a brick patio. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein 9 ZBA 61-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER IMA_ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-62-V-90, JILL AND IRV EBERL LOCATION: 609 NOAH TERRACE DATE: JULY 30, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on an application filed by Jill and Iry Eberl. The application effects the property at 609 Noah Terrace and was filed to permit a variance from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15 foot rear yard instead of the required 25 foot rear yard. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting, the petitioner's contractor, Gary Peterson, presented testimony in support of the request. He described the physical characteristics of the room addition, noting that it would be slightly smaller than an existing concrete patio. The addition would be located on top of the existing patio, therefore, not adding any additional lot coverage. He stated that roof run-off would be controlled by gutters on the addition and channeled into existing gutters on the house. He also stated that he had obtained an informational hand-out from the Village Hall that erroneously indicated a room addition could be constructed with a 15 foot rear yard. He understood the need for the variation, and pointed out that this small addition would have no adverse impact on adjoining properties. Mr. Peterson also indicated that the adjoining neighbors on Noah Terrace submitted letters in support of the request. Testimony against the request was presented by two adjoining neighbors to the east, Frank Senise of 608 St. Cecilia and Antony and Amy Avalon of 606 St. Cecilia. Concerns were expressed regarding existing backyard drainage problems and the impact the proposed room addition would have on drainage patterns. Concerns were also expressed regarding the existing rear yards. Most homes on the block are built up to the rear yard setback line, 25 feet from the property line. It was noted that no other homes on the block have building additions, and this could set precedent. Additionally, concerns were expressed relating to aesthetics of the proposed room addition. Page 2 ZBA-62-V-90 July 30, 1990 The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. The Board noted that the block is cl<aracterized by large homes with deep front yards. As a result, the lots have shallow rear yards and many come close to the maximum lot coverage allowed (45%). Board members Basnik and Brettrager expressed reservations about setting a precedent for rear yard encroachments. However, it was believed that the proposed room addition was small, and would have no adverse effect on homes to the east. Concerns were also expressed about the impact on drainage. It was noted that the amount of hard surface on the lot would not be changed and therefore, run-off would not be increased. In fact, gutters on the room addition would better control stormwater than run- off from the existing patio. Based on concerns expressed, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the 15 foot rear yard to accommodate a .room addition at 609 Noah Terrace conditioned on: - New construction should be brick to match existing house - Drainage (grading) plans be reviewed and approved by Village Engineer - No additional buildings be placed on the lot DMC:hg 5740 NORTH ELSTON AVENUE CHICAGO, IUINOIS 60646 E CERTIFIED SURVEY CO. PLAT OF SURVEY �a�urli€ 4 Luz Vhonw 17i•JTS� 773.7736 LOT 54 IN ST. CECILIA SUBOIV151 ON, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 2 -AND PART OF LOTS 1 AND 6 IN MEtER BROTHERS 5U BD IV151 ON, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF SECTIONS 10 AND 35, TOM5HIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY. ILLJ Not S. N W E S E CERTIFIED SURVEY CO. PLAT OF SURVEY �a�urli€ 4 Luz Vhonw 17i•JTS� 773.7736 LOT 54 IN ST. CECILIA SUBOIV151 ON, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 2 -AND PART OF LOTS 1 AND 6 IN MEtER BROTHERS 5U BD IV151 ON, BEING A SUBDIVISION OF PARTS OF SECTIONS 10 AND 35, TOM5HIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK COUNTY. ILLJ Not S. 4 �M / STORY 9Rsfxi �Q D � �eM r rmaJx r: ct ar /ROH PIPI AT fdXf! A3Ttlo3J:Y [OT CORNER = 301a 0 6S.7D � j I I� taKCQEJE JOvaal T�aN #([ � 8 3a.6q 7808 ' H \ n tp tz Y JJ f� JPA Pusuc UJl17J71J 0411AI OE M ( P/Pk' RT 17317' €€ [dT CORNER t�_I', of"SAT 'n -+3•'h s REA E EVATION } • d t�_I', of"SAT 'n -+3•'h a y FT ELEVATIQ-N RIGI-IT ELEVATION •• >' .e.-ag,fu a#1'R'j#fF•'�Mi '- R � k �" si 'G �'#. >e7 i<v1 1 ' '^.� t `. + � - in Lot! 1 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (Minutes Combined for 2 Identical Cases) ZBA CASE NO. 62-V-90 Hearing Date: July 26, 1990 63-V-90 PETITIONER: Jill and Iry Eberl Jackie Nemirow SUBJECT PROPERTY: 609 Noah Terrace 607 Noah Terrace PUBLICATION DATE: July 10, 1990 REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15' rear yard instead of the required 251 rear yard to accommodate a room addition., ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Michaele Skowron Frank Senise, Tony Avalone Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioners are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15' rear yard instead of the required 25' rear yard to accommodate a room addition. Mr. Gary Peterson, representing the homeowners as the general contractor for the job, presented the case stating that both homes are identical except built opposite of each other. Mr. Peterson continued by stating that the petitioners had intended to put on room additions when the house was first constructed. They then submitted for a building permit and were informed that only a 15' rear yard was required for a room addition. Mr. Peterson was then contacted by the Village stating that for a room addition a 25' rear yard is required and they would have to get a variance for a 15' rear yard. Chairman Basnik asked what are the room additions intended for. Mr. Peterson stated that the room additions are for privacy because the homes now have windows in the rear of the buildings and can see their neighbors directly behind them. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the need for a variance was caught in the permit review 'ZBA-62-V-90 ZBA-63-V-90 July 26, 1990 Page 2 of 2 process. Mr. Clements continued by stating that these lot are near the maximum impervious surface of 45% and there may be a concern with drainage. He also noted that there are no additions on the rear of any homes on this block. Frank Senise, 608 St. Cecilia, stated that the lots in the area are all at the maximum impervious surface. Mr. Senise is also concerned with the drainage and feels he will get all the water because he is directly behind the residences. Mr. Senise also stated that if they put on an addition everyone else will start building additions. Tony and Amy Avalone, 606 St. Cecilia, stated he is also concerned with the drainage and would like to know what kind of addition such as brick or aluminum are they going to construct. Mr. Peterson stated that the homes would match the original construction of the building and presented letters from the next door neighbors of each petitioner stating they did not object to the room additions. Mr. Peterson also presented the Board with pictures of Mr. Senise and Mr. Avalone's homes from the petitioners views from their rear windows. The Board then generally discussed the cases. Chairman Basnik questioned the hardship of the cases. Mr. Brettrager felt if the additions would blend in with the rest of the house it would be okay. Chairman Basnik and Mr. Brettrager have reservations regarding the 25" rear yard. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a 151 rear yard to construct a room addition with the condition that the drainage be reviewed and approved by the Village Engineer , no additional structures on the property, and the additions match the existing structures. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 4-0. These Cases must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W L FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-62-V.90, JILL AND IRV EBERL LOCATION: 609 NOAH TERRACE DATE: JULY 19, 1990 REQUEST The applicants are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a 15 foot rear yard to accommodate a proposed room addition. The Code requires a 25 foot rear yard setback. I Engineering and Inspection Services request that grading plans showing existing and proposed conditions be submitted with the building plans. No fill shall be placed which would alter existing drainage patterns. PLALNMkN_G AND ZONING COMMENTS Mr & Mrs. Eberl hope to construct a 13' X 20' room addition on the back of their home at 609 Noah Terrace. Staff notes that this property, like many in the block, has a shallow (28') rear yard due to the location of the house on the lot. This severely limits opportunities to construct additions, decks, or other structures in the rear yard without seeking a rear yard variance. Staff also notes that the minimum 25 foot rear yard for primary structures has been maintained by other properties in the block. The room addition will be placed in the same location as the existing concrete patio. It will not be any larger. Subsequently, the addition should not result in an increase of run-off. Downspouts could direct run-off to the sideyard rather than the rear yard which slopes toward the neighbor's lot. The applicants should be aware that lot coverage is at 43.5%. The maximum allowed is 45%. Consequently the area available for outdoor patio space is very limited. Page 2 ZBA-62-V-90 July 19, 1990 The contractor for the applicant picked -up a general hand-out for decks, patios and room additions. This band -out erroneously stated that a room addition could be built at a 15 foot setback. Room additions, of course, have to meet the same 25 foot setback as the house. Upon review of the building plans, staff noted that the proposed room addition did not meet the rear yard requirement of 25 feet, and advised the contractor that the variation was necessary. Staff acknowledges the applicant's frustration in designing the room addition to meet the guidelines of the hand-out. However, inasmuch as the room addition encroaches into the rear yard, the variation is necessary. It should be noted that the information in the hand-out has been corrected. The proposed room addition is near the center of the house, and is only 20 feet in length. It does not run along the entire length of the house. Accordingly, there are adequate setbacks from adjoining properties. With the location of the house on the lot built at a minimum rear yard, there could be no room addition without a variation. Accordingly, a small addition such as this proposal, the same size of the patio, may be appropriate, if there are no justifiable objections from adjoining property owners. DMC:hg CAF 8/13/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COM KNOW KNOWR_R —_&a_k0 OAH_TERR6CE WHEREAS, Iry and Jill Eberl (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 609 Noah Terrace (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 60 in St. Cecilia Subdivision, being a resubdivision of Lot 2, and part of Lots 3 and 6 in Meier Bros. Subdivision, being a subdivision of parts of Sections 10 and 15, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a fifteen foot (1511) rear yard setback, instead of the required 25 feet in order to add a room addition to this existing single family dwelling; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 62-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect- Herald on the loth day of July, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 62-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a fifteen foot (151) rear yard setback for a room addition, the construction material to be used on the room addition shall match the existing structure. Also, there shall be no additional buildings placed on the lot. A grading plan is required prior to issuance of a building permit. 5ECTIOTHREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ZBA 62-V-90 Page 2 of 2 and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley ATTEST: Village President Carol A. Fields Village Clerk '1990. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WL FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-63-V-90, JACKIE NEMIROW LOCATION: 607 NOAH TERRACE DATE: JULY 19, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on an application filed by Jill and Iry Eberl. The application effects the property at 609 Noah Terrace and was filed to permit a variance from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15 foot rear yard instead of the required 25 foot rear yard. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting, the petitioner's contractor, Gary Peterson, presented testimony in support of the request. He described the physical characteristics of the room addition, noting that it would be slightly smaller than an existing concrete patio. The addition would be located on top of the existing patio, therefore, not adding any additional lot coverage. He stated that roof run-off would be controlled by gutters on the addition and channeled into existing gutters on the house. He also stated that he had obtained an informational hand-out from the Village Hall that erroneously indicated a room addition could be constructed with a 15 foot rear yard. He understood the need for the variation, and pointed out that this small addition would have no adverse impact on adjoining properties. Mr. Peterson also indicated that the adjoining neighbors on Noah Terrace submitted letters in support of the request. Testimony against the request was presented by two adjoining neighbors to the east, Frank Sense of 608 St. Cecilia and Antony and Amy Avalone of 606 St. Cecilia. Concerns were expressed regarding existing backyard drainage problems and the impact the proposed room addition would have on drainage patterns. Concerns were also expressed regarding the existing rear yards. Most homes on the block are built up to the rear yard setback line, 25 feet from the property line. It was noted that no other homes on the block have building additions, and this could set precedent. Additionally, concerns were expressed relating to aesthetics of the proposed room addition. Page 2 ZBA-63-V-90 July 30, 1990 The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. The Board noted that the block is characterized by large homes with deep front yards. As a result, the lots have shallow rear yards and many come close to the maximum lot coverage allowed (45%). Board members Basnik and Brettrager expressed reservations about setting a precedent for rear yard encroachments. However, it was believed that the proposed room addition was small, and would have no adverse effect on homes to the east. Concerns were also expressed about the impact on drainage. It was noted that the amount of bard surface on the lot would not be changed and therefore, run-off would not be increased. In fact, gutters on the room addition would better control stormwater than run- off from the existing patio. Based on concerns expressed, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the 15 foot rear yard to accommodate a room addition at 609 Noah Terrace conditioned on: - New construction should be brick to match existing house - Drainage (grading) plans be reviewed and approved by Village Engineer - No additional buildings be placed on the lot DMC:hg AND I5, TONNSMtP 41 yNORTMRANGE�I2UEASTCOF4TMESTHIRD IPRtNCtPALAMER @2ANCtNOCOQKR COUNTY ILLINOIS. /Row P/PF Rr Lor CofNof 1¢,llj+l2 A"j"< i8�i U1 ,e((G't womo or [or to mow i�tU.fft� - - - - - - - - - - nrAM LA C%IA -A&I m Wl -A , &a.' L�_ rwi. r,=3r- A 4 *A- M 1 ITUIP A Plw Cra IT f-41-1 S Ili, -,-- N 11 LEFT Pi E ]ON AlafT ELEVAT04 1,1.1,171�1 4-V_ 4. if Val=' "o, 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (Minutes Combined for 2 Identical Cases) ZBA CASE No. 62-V-90 Hearing Date: July 26, 1990 63-V-90 PETITIONER: Jill and Iry Eberl Jackie Nemirow SUBJECT PROPERTY: 609 Noah Terrace 607 Noah Terrace PUBLICATION DATE: July 10, 1990 REQUEST: Variation from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15' rear yard instead of the required 251 rear yard to accommodate a room addition. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager ABSENT: Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Michaele Skowron OBJECTORS/INTERES.TED PARTIES: Frank Senise, Tony Avalone Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioners are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15' rear yard instead of the required 251 rear yard to accommodate a room addition. Mr. Gary Peterson, representing the homeowners as the general contractor for the job, presented the case stating that both homes are identical except built opposite of each other. Mr. Peterson continued by stating that the petitioners had intended to put on room additions when the house was first constructed. They then submitted for a building permit and were informed that only a 151 rear yard was required for a room addition. Mr. Peterson was then contacted by the Village stating that for a room addition a 251 rear yard is required and they would have to get a variance for a 15' rear yard. Chairman Basnik asked what are the room additions intended for. Mr. Peterson stated that the room additions are for privacy because the homes now have windows in the rear of the buildings and can see their neighbors directly behind them. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the need for a variance was caught in the permit review ZBA-62-V-90 ZBA-63-V-90 July 26, 1990 Page 2 of 2 process. Mr. Clements continued by stating that these lot are near the maximum impervious surface of 45% and there may be a concern with drainage. He also noted that there are no additions on the rear of any homes on this block. Frank Senise, 608 St. Cecilia, stated that the lots in the area are all at the maximum impervious surface. Mr. Senise is also concerned with the drainage and feels he will get all the water because he is directly behind the residences. Mr. Senise also stated that if they put on an addition everyone else will start building additions. - Tony and Amy Avalone, 606 St. Cecilia, stated h ' e is also concerned with the drainage and would like to know what kind of addition such as brick or aluminum are they going to construct. Mr. Peterson stated that the homes would match the original construction of the building and presented letters from the next door neighbors of each petitioner stating they did not object to the room additions. Mr. Peterson also presented the Board with pictures of Mr. Senise and Mr. Avalone's homes from the petitioners views from their rear windows. The Board then generally discussed the cases. Chairman Basnik questioned the hardship of the cases. Mr. Brettrager felt if the additions would blend in with the rest of the house it would be okay. Chairman Basnik and Mr. Brettrager have reservations regarding the 25" rear yard. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a 15' rear yard to construct a room addition with the condition that the drainage be reviewed and approved by the Village Engineer , no additional structures on the property, and the additions match the existing structures. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 4-0. These Cases must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VALAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN - n FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-63.V.90, JACKIE NEMIROW LOCATION: 607 NOAH TERRACE DATE: JULY 19, 1990 REQUEST The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a 15 foot rear yard to accommodate a proposed room addition. The Code requires a 25 foot rear yard setback, LAGE-STAFF COM Engineering and Inspection Services request that grading plans showing existing and proposed conditions be submitted with the building plans. No fill shall be placed which would alter existing drainage patterns. PLXNNMI G ANDZOLNING COMMENTS Ms. Nemirow hopes to construct a 13' X 20' room addition on the back of her home at 607 Noah Terrace. Staff notes that this property, like many in the block, has a shallow (28') rear yard due to the location of the house on the lot. This severely limits opportunities to construct additions, decks, or other structures in the rear yard without seeking a rear yard variance, Staff also notes that the minimum 25 foot rear yard for primary structures has been maintained by other properties in the block. The room addition will be placed in the same location as the existing concrete patio. It will not be any larger. Subsequently, the addition should not result in an increase of run-off. Downspouts could direct run-off to the sideyard rather than the rear yard which slopes toward the neighbor's lot. The applicant should be aware that lot coverage is at 43.5%. The maximum allowed is 45%. Consequently the area available for outdoor patio space is very limited. Page 2 ZBA-63.V-90 July 19, 1990 The contractor for the applicant picked -up a general hand-out for decks, patios and room additions. This hand-out erroneously stated that a room addition could be built at a 15 foot setback. Room additions, of course, have to meet the same 25 foot setback as the house. Upon review of the building plans, staff noted that the proposed room addition did not meet the rear yard requirement of 25 feet, and advised the contractor that the variation was necessary. Staff acknowledges the applicant's frustration in designing the room addition to meet the guidelines of the hand-out. However, inasmuch as the room addition encroaches into the rear yard, the variation is necessary. It should be noted that the information in the hand-out has been corrected. The proposed room addition is near the center of the house, and is only 20 feet in length. It does not run along the entire length of the house. Accordingly, there are adequate setbacks from adjoining properties. With the location of the house on the lot built at a minimum rear yard, there could be no room addition without a variation. Accordingly, a small addition such as this, proposal, the same size of the patio, may be appropriate, if there are no justifiable objections from adjoining property owners. DMC:hg CAF 8/13/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 607 NOAH TERRACE WHEREAS, Jackie Nemirow (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 607 Noah Terrace (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 59 in St. Cecilia Subdivision, being a resubdivision of Lot 2, and part of Lots 3 and 6 in Meier Bros. Subdivision, being a subdivision of parts of Sections 10 and 15, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a fifteen foot (15") rear yard setback, instead of the required 25 feet in order to add a room addition to this existing single family dwelling; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 63-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of July, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 63-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a fifteen foot (151) rear yard setback for a room addition, the construction material to be used on the room addition shall match the existing structure. Also, there shall be no additional buildings placed on the lot. A grading plan is required prior to issuance of a building permit. SECTION THREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect ZBA 63-V-90 Page 2 of 2 and after its passage,- approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk '1990. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-65-V-90, JOSEPH SWIDERSKI LOCATION: 1307 EAST ARDYCE LANE DATE: JULY 30, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on an application filed by Joseph Swiderski. The application affects the property at 1307 Ardyce Lane and was filed to permit the following variation: Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 5 foot separation between an existing deck and a proposed family room addition rather than the 10 feet required. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting, John Green, Architect representing the petitioner, presented evidence in support of the request. He explained that the Swiderski's regularly held family dinners and meetings attended by several people. Their existing home does not adequately accommodate these gatherings. The proposed addition would provide a "great room" large enough to accommodate the family's needs. Mr. Green indicated that 10 neighboring households submitted letters in support of the request. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, acknowledging the neighbors' consent. Some concerns were expressed about the amount of lot coverage. It was noted that the deck is slatted, and water can percolate through the gravel and soil base beneath the deck. Accordingly, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of the request to allow a 5 foot separation between the existing deck and the proposed addition at 1307 East Ardyce Lane with the following condition: - No other structures shall be built on this lot. Also, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals gave final approval of the request to allow 53% lot coverage and a Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) of 0.42 at 1307 East Ardyce Lane. DMC:hg *'. n+aw6 sr.ss m Hf6R6Rr h, Hl m f:u*sc sa "w-. ur .ia o006 m 6.uicxr �r�i I! U matliaur vw66v VV 4',. �, :erns rOfffrlrlr �T �' Yr Z f � � a 1IE GREAT ROOM WITH CONNECTED FULL BASEMENT in O� t E13.TING ff Z TOILET p., '>JSTING } DINTNG 1 -w KITCHEN a' i x �/ ..... KITCHEN °yy I E LMNG I i, GARAGE ".'"� L ING ROOM ul� 4SCMf uLL01 f.i6rR6i hPLL[ r0.URMG fMp,r tlp P. 'GP aED_. NEW FIRST FLOOR PLAN? o ". y k 4sI S . 675 SO F7 ADDITION. MR & MRS JOSEPH SWIDERSKI PROPOSED ADDITION�� 1307 E. ARDYCE LANE F1'g SYSTEMS DESIGN GROUP, LTD. ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS 5999 106 R—g 60006 ��-V- 0) U E rL.*%& err 4wmvtt Lot ., .n Coll.ro & Catimol. St. Emily's Rooubd-lon, being in the West 1/2 of ". gest 1/2 , 1/4 O*r' See t I an 35, Toone Ili P 42 Nur th, Range 11, 311IN t of the 3rd Prins i pal Ider id len, i n Cook C o, ARD YCe LANE o,j. me.- 70Y794 Sea. I — .... ... RwetrtrYlr $tat*, of "r,"04 to Caw" #4 Ceek f We. CIRTIRID SURVEY CO. 4. henbr e.toy the — here located the buiWing en the abe pmpwty. AMM gWMeeXi'.ngMk Ro" of Ceemy w ceek We. C"tTIRM SURVEY CO. d. "i —YW 164 It"" 40ouibo4 P,.PWY d— b 4 WMO werteoMttan .4 wk MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 65-V-90 PETITIONER: SUBJECT PROPERTY: PUBLICATION DATE: REQUEST: ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: ABSENT: OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Hearing Date: July 26, 1990 Joseph Swiderski 1307 E. Ardyce Lane July 10, 1990 Variation from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 5' separation between an existing deck and a proposed building addition Lather than the 10' required. Section 14.1102.E to permit 53% lot coverage rather than 45% allowed by Code. Section 14.1103 to permit FAR of 0.42 rather than 0.35 allowed by Code. Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Richard Pratt Ronald Cassidy Robert Brettrager Peter Lannon Lois Brothers Michaele Skowron Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner is requesting a variance from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow 5' separation between an existing deck and proposed building addition rather than the 10' required. Section 14.1102.E to permit 53% lot coverage rather than 45% allowed by Code. Section 14.1103 to permit a FAR of 0.42 rather than 0.35 allowed by Code. John Green, representing the petitioner, stated that the Swiderski family has been in the area for 16 years and would like to stay in the area. Mr. Green continued by stating that the Swiderski family is very large and consists of 8 brothers and four sisters and the main intention for the room addition is for family gatherings which occur on a daily basis not just on holidays. Mr. Green the showed the Board pictures of surrounding houses which are fairly large homes and this home is large but would blend in with the neighbors. ZBA-65-V-90 July 26, 1990 Page 2 of 2 David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that there is a large freestanding deck on the property and brings this near the lot coverage requirement. Mr. Clements stated that the deck could be reduced in size, or the room addition shortened to reduce variations. Mr. Pratt asked if this is one continuous dining and kitchen area. Mr. Green Stated that the main part of the part of the addition is the kitchen and dining room. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for the variance, with a condition of no other structure on the property. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager moved. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 4-0. This Case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-65-V.90, JOSEPH SWIDERSKI LOCATION: 1307 EAST ARDYCE LANE DATE: JULY 19, 1990 REQUEST The applicant is requesting variances from the following Sections of the Zoning Ordinance: 1. Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 5 foot separation between an existing deck and a proposed family room addition. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 10 foot separation. 2. Section 14.1102.E to permit 53% lot coverage. Mount Prospect Ordinance allows a maximum of 45% total lot coverage. 3. Section 14.1103 to permit a floor area ratio (F.A.R.) of 0.42. Mount Prospect Ordinance allows a maximum, F.A.R. OF 0.35. The applicant is seeking these variances to accommodate a proposed 15'X 51'-111/2"(780 sq.ft.) room addition. 3ILLAGE STAFF COMMEhM Engineering and Inspection Services request that grading plans be submitted which show existing and proposed conditions. No fill shall be placed which will alter existing drainage patterns. In addition, downspouts must conform to the downspout regulations. PLAMING AND ZONING COMMENTS Mr. Swidersld is proposing to construct a room addition along the entire length of the back of his house at 1307 Ardyce Lane. Currently, the lot is covered by 48.5% impervious surface and exceeds Ordinance requirements. The proposed addition will account for an additional 4.5% coverage or 53%. The excessive amount of existing lot coverage is due to the large size (approximately 27' X 28') of the existing freestanding deck. Staff notes that no other lots in the immediate vicinity have as much lot coverage. Page 2 ZBA-65-V-90 July 19, 1990 The proposed addition extends to 5 feet from the existing deck. Staff questions the resulting relationship between the deck and the room addition. The 5 foot space between the deck and the addition will create a long and narrow "left over" space that could be visually awkward. In addition, steps accessing the deck currently project 3'4' toward the house. If the steps remain in their current position, only P-2' will remain between the deck and the addition. The applicant has gathered letters from 15 neighbors (representing 10 households) stating that they don*t object to the proposal. These households are shown on the attached map. Staff notes that the lot coverage variation and FAR. variation point to the fact that this lot is over -built. Individually, these variations are not substantial, but their combined effect contribute to this being a more significant request. It is recommended that the petitioner fully explain the necessity of the room addition, and why a smaller size would not be workable. One other alternative is to reduce the size of the large 2T X 28' deck, to allow more open space. All appropriate standards for variations should be examined with this request Staff questions the hardship with this application, and believes there may be other alternatives that do not require these combined variations. DMC:hg CAF 8/13/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1,307 EAST ARDYCE LANE WHEREAS, Joseph M. and Diane M. Swiderski (hereinafter referred to as Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 1307 Ardyce Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 44 in Callero & Catino's St. Emily's Resubdivision being in the West Half (1/2) of the West Half (1/2) of the Southeast Quarter (1/4) of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois according to Plate thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois on October 29, 1970 as Document Number 2528274 and WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.102.B.1 to permit a five foot (51) separation between an existing deck and a proposed building addition, rather than the required 101; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 65-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of July, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mg-Unt Prospect Herald on the 10th day of July, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 65-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: S-ECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTIQU TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the subject Property a variation from Section 14.102.B.1 to permit a five foot (51) separation between an existing deck and a proposed building addition, as shown on the Site Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". b9ECTION THREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. 5ECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect NEW ZBA 65-V-90 Page 2 of 2 and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President Carol A. Fields Village Clerk V I L '17 -AGE OF MOUNT PROS�ECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: August 16, 1990 SUBJECT. Par Four Subdivision - 1920 West Golf Road The applicant is requesting approval to create a four lot subdivision out of an existing single lot. The site is bordered to the west, north, and east by single-family homes and will have access on to Golf Road. The access road serving this 1.4 acre site has received IDOT approval to be served by Golf Road. The applicant is also seeking approval of a Development Code modification to permit street. lights on Golf Road to be installed at a later time. This is necessary due to the IDOT policy that prohibits spotlighting on state right-of-ways. The Plan Commission heard the above noted Par Four Subdivision items during their regular meeting on August 1, 1990. The Commission voted 5-2 in favor of recommending approval of the Par Four Subdivision. The two descending votes were cast because they felt the service street drive should be a public street. The subdivision plat before you shows this drive area as a public road right-of-way. The Plan Commission then voted 7-0 in favor of recommending approval of the Development Code modification for street lighting. This vote was made contingent upon the applicant signing a restrictive covenant guaranteeing that street lights will be installed at a later date, when requested. MS:c1 '4AW" Aft B V I S xN OF c ar ult 5 mmmov= mom us =ngrwt�wj?w am 47S M? in ust 3KX mmu 9110"Wen. IN 14M A PART W 11=101t 10 An is, oUWYV, $4 10", BOX 111 UST 011 11111100 00111UM HOMO, 0 WK a Mr aMi Mna�rwW 1r 7 -k4 go aw #W4 w%W mmimaka mA. km *0 to �k *"wood" oft 000*dW 4"A "d "amow" ce sucaidw wmis:� Awn W" ** daiwot 60 ON ow pw NA cdm o4w v MAW *& 40im 41 oat r Oft* *M*Mk AW *k 490 OW*WW Of bw "4w wbw I* so m4moW too, dw r*t to wam work umium "d "m " aw w roawm� wAd" 0 do rwo hwow 0446 $a dw row ** 06&v" 1: 10 "A pwpmm *4 so be pkkwd wrr adwo wt% r ow plop" md" W"'ow az*A ost, *%wW Is & w~ so a lo- — ~ ##WWM a" NeWomm" *mo& -rcr of filmools 71-276—Ap It "Elm MZW� N X SWWu19w1wWm~rr.WLW* ItlttlN ?*A 70.0 E.NAUERT.Do HEREBY CERTIFY' THAT I AM THE OWNER OF M DESCRIBED HEREON AND I HAVE CAUSED THE SAID PROPERTY DIVIDE SJPDWW ON THE PLAT HERM DRAWN. 3 DAY of, —1990 [QUM E.HAUERT u ACCWT1D By THE PRESIDENT AND WARD OF TRUST= OF IV VILLAGE OF WW PROSPOCT C= COUNTY.ILLINOIS AT A UMM MEETING MOD IWIS DAY OF .1990 BY: PWIDW OF BOARD OF TRUSTEES ATTEST: VILLAGE tmintr AM*M BY TRE PLAN CCHMISSION OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT coot COUNMILLINOIS AT A REGULAR 14EETING HELD THIS (rrDAY of 04 04 el. �k 7- 11990 CHAIRMAN SECRETARY VILA�AGE OF MOUNT PROb"PECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manger M� FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning DATE: August 17, 1990 SUBJECT: Plat of Easement 443 East Rand Road The Plat of Easement being requested is to create a 20' wide easement for water main and drainage. This site is owned by the Village of Mount Prospect and is now in the process of being sold. The easement is needed in order to be sure the Village will have access for maintenance to the water main located on the northwest side yard of the property. The Plan Commission heard this item during their regular meeting on Wednesday, August 15,, 1990 and voted 5-0 in favor of recommending that the easement be approved. Staff has no objections to the Plat of Easement. MS:c1 attachment ,-'-44qr 0-41w &4.5eMeNr AOR 417*IZ17. X oe'--le TheNor"we,-�efly ?Q.o felt of Lot'* In Block 1, In 11ROSPECT MEAT)OWS, a Suhdjw1.91.,, t of he We�,t !/,' of the Southwest 1/ 4 of Sao Town, hip 42 North. Range ii. 'clod n' East t 0 f the Third Principal Meridian (except that part Ifing Northeasterly of the center line of,land goad) and (excepting th#t*frOm the following ptooe.l or parcels of Land: The North 147,'A feet Of the East 147.58 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of said .;ecti.n 27, and the South 147.58 feet of the Last. 147.-,8 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 27). also (excert that Dart thereof described as follows; Beginning on a line 50.0 feet East of the west lane of the Southwest 1/4 of sold Section 27 at a point on said line 50.0 feet South of the North line Of said Southwest 1/4o thence South parellpl with the Moat line of said Southwest 1/4, P00.0 feet, thence East narallel with the North line of the Southwest 1/4 of said Section 27. 38",.78 ferto thence Northeasterly at right angles to the center line of 4and Road 14.77 feet, to a line 50.0 feet Southwesterly of and parallel with the center line of -tend Road, thence Northwesterly along said line 50.0 Poet, Southwesterly of and parallel with the center line of Uml Road. 237.66 toot to a line 50.0 feet mouth of end oarallel with the North line of said Southwest 1/4, thence est narallel with the North line of SaLd Southwest 1/4 251.92 feet to the point. of beginning). all In Cook County. Illinois. ---- —�,' MINUTES OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT SAFETY COMMISSION AUGUST 6, 1990 I. CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Safety Commission was called to order at 7:35 p.m. II. ROLL CALL Present upon roll call: Lee Beening, Chairman John Metzenthin, Camissioner Tom Daley, Police Dept. Buz Livingston, Fire Dept. Drew Johanson, Engr. Dept. Absent: Andy Mitchell, C=mdssioner Art Coy, ommissioner III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Tom Daley, 2nd. by John Metzenthin, moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of The Safety Commission held March 5, 1990. Motion passed unanimously. IV. NEW BUSINESS A. The Safety Commission reviewed the parking restrictions on Prospect Ave. & recommend the following: 1. Two hour parking on the south side between Central Rd. & Mt. Prospect Rd & also on the north side between Main St. & Emerson St. 2. Four hour parking on the north side between Elmhurst Ave. & Main & between Emerson St. & Maple St. 3. Twelve hour meter parking between Central Rd. & Elmhurst Ave. & between Maple St. & Mt. Prospect Rd. Recommendation passed unanimously. B. The Safety Commission reviewed the information received From IDOT regarding the request from the residents of Crystal Tower for "No Right Turn on Red" sign at Algonquin Rd. & Busse Rd. The Village & two elected officials of the state have requested this turning restriction at the request of the residents. IDOT is not responsive to the appeals at all. Chairman Beening stated there was nothing further the Village can do and suggested if the residents wish to pursue the turn restriction, that they contact IDOT directly. Commission Members concurred unanimously. C. The Safety Commission reviewed a request from the Northwest Meadows Association for a Yield sign at the intersection of Henry St. & Forest Ave. Commissioner Metzenthin, 2nd. by Buz Livingston moved to concur and recommend the installation of a Yield Sign on Henry St. at Forest Ave. Motion passed unanimously D. The Safety Commissi., a reviewe-, the concerns of School District 59, regarding Robert Frost School. The school's ,Safety Committee's letter indicates children cross Cottonwood Lane indiscriminately between intersections. Drew Johanson informed the members Cottonwood Lane has been repaved and the old crosswalk markings had not been replaced. Chairman Beening, 2nd. by Commissioner Metzenthin, moved to recommend to replace the crosswalk markings as they existed prior to construction. Motion passed unanimously V. ADJOURNMENT Having no further business the meeting was adjourned at 8:40 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Drew Johanson DJ:dk:minutes CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE C012B BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE:. That Section 18.2006 entitled "No Parking Any Time" of Article XX of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom the wording "Prospect Ave. South The first200ft. east of Maple St." and "Prospect Ave. North Btw. Maple St. and Mount Prospect Rd." and by adding thereto in proper alphabetical, sequence "Prospect Ave. South Btw. Edward St. and Mt. Prospect Rd."; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2006 of Article XX of Chapter 18 shall include the following: it Name of Side of Street Street Descriptign Prospect Ave. South Btw. Edward St. & Mount Prospect Rd. SECTION TWO:. That Section 18.2010 entitled "Eight Hour Parking" of Article XX of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom the wording "Elm St. East Btw- Northwest Hwy. & the 6 parking stalls south of Evergreen Ave." and "Prospect Ave. North Btw. Pine St. & Hi Lusi Ave." and "Prospect Ave. North Btw. Maple St. & School St." SECTION THREE: That Section 18.2011.A entitled "Two Hour Parking" of Article XX of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom the wording "Prospect Ave. North & South Btw. Pine St. & Main St." and "Prospect Ave. North Btw. Emerson St. and a point 94 ft. east of Main St." and by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Prospect Ave. South Btw. Pine St. & Main St."; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2011.A shall include the following: to Name of Side of Street Street Description Prospect Ave. South Btw. Pine St. & Main St. 11 SECTION FOUR: That Section 18.2011.B entitled "Two Hour Parking" of Article XX of Chapter IS (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom the wording "Prospect Ave. South Btw. Emerson & School Sts." and by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Prospect Ave. South Btw. School & Edward St."; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2011.B shall include the following: it Name of Street Side of Street Prospect Ave. South Btw. School & Edwards Sts. 11 Chapter 18 Page 2 of 3 SECTION FIVE: That Section 18.2012 entitled "Four Hour Parking" of Article XX of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper alphabetical sequence "Prospect Ave. North Btw. Emerson & Maple Sts." and "Prospect Ave. North Btw. Main St. & Central Rd."; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2012 shall include the following: to Name of Side of Street Street Description Prospect Ave. North Btw. Emerson & Maple Sts. Prospect Ave. North Btw. Main St. Central Rd. SECTION SIX: That Section 18.1320 entitled "Time Limits" of Article XIII of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding hereto paragraph F; so that hereinafter said Section 18.1320 shall be amended to include the following: F. Twelve Hour Parking. Parking of automobiles and other vehicles is limited to twelve (12) hours on any day, except Sundays and legal holidays, between the hours of six o'clock (6:00) A.M. and one o'clock (1:00) A.M. on the streets or portion thereof included in Schedule XV of the Appendix to this Chapter." SECTION SEVEN: That Section 18.2015 entitled "Parking Meter Zones" of Article XX of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by creating paragraphs A and B; so that hereinafter Section 18.2015 paragraphs Section 18.2015.A and Section 18.2015,B shall be and read as follows: See. 18.2015.A Parking Meter Zones. In accordance with Section 18.1322.A, and when parking meters and/or collection boxes are installed, no person, without having complied with the requirements of Section 18.1322, shall park a vehicle within the districts or upon those streets or parts thereof described below: SCHEDULE XV A District pg street Descriptj South Maple Street Lot Lot A in Corporate Subdivision 10-A, generally located on the east side of Maple Street between Lincoln Street and Prospect Avenue. Chicago & Northwestern Railroad Lots: Lot No. 1 The area lying North of the railroad, South of Northwest Highway and immediately West of Main Street. Lot No. 2 The area lying North of the railroad, South of Northwest Highway and between Main and Emerson Streets. Lot 2 The area lying North of the railroad, South of Northwest Highway and immediately East of Emerson Street. B. Sec. 18.2015.B. Parking Meter Zones. In accordance with Section 18.1320.F and when meters and/or master collection boxes are installed and signs are posted giving notice hereof, no person without having complied with the requirements of Section 18.1322 shall park a vehicle within the districts or upon those streets or parts thereof described below: 03viarmg Prospect Ave., North Side of Street of W20-T#r KA&K Btw. Maple & Edward Streets SECTION EIGHT: That Section 18.2018 entitled "One Hour Parking" of Article XX of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Elm St. East The first 6 parking stalls south of*- Evergreen Ave." SECTION NINE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form the manner provide by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk day of Gerald L. Farley Village President 1990. 50mw.Central Road, Suite 104 ~ Mount Prospect, Illinois ^m56 ~ (312) 398-6616 MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER August IG, I990 Mayor Farley and Village Trustees lOO South Emerson Mt. Prospect, Illinois 00056 Dear Mayor Farley and Village Trustees: This letter c000ecou the lst reading on August 7, 1990 of a proposed ordinance to amend Section 13,124 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code. Our understanding is that this ordinance *mold purport to change the status quo in regard to local liquor commissions proceedings by eliminating the liquor license holder's right to appeal an adverse ruling of the local liquor commission to the Illinois Liquor Control Commission. Instead, the ordinance provides that the only recourse available to an aggrieved license holder would be an appeal to the Circuit Court of conk County, a right which is currently available after an adverse ruling by both the local liquor commissioner and the Illinois Liquor Control As a practical matter this would mean that the fate of a liquor license bolder and his ability todobusiness would be in the hands of one person, which is the Mayor, without an automatic stay of any decision made in order to allow the license holder an opportunity for a review of his decision by a separate body. Recourse to the state court would not be adequate because the business would suffer immediate harm ouIesa and until it can petition the court on an emergency basis to obtain an injunction against the local commissioner. The Chamber of Commerce believes that this action would be a dangerous consolidation of power into the hands of one individual, without an adequate system of checks and balances to prevent a possible abuse of this power. A system of obeoba and balances is fundamental to our system of government and the Chamber of Commerce feels that in this area, there should be no exception. If the Village would propose an ordinance whereby one official could take away the business license of any other type of business owner without an effective review process, every citizen would be outraged. we should not be blinded to this basic unfairness simply because it is a liquor Ilweoae holder's business that is involved here. The ends should not be allowed to justify the means. Mayor eozIey and Village Trustees August 16, 1990 Page -2- Further, it is the opinion of James uuluamia, Chief Legal Counsel of the Illinois Liquor Control Commission, that such a proposed ordinance is not constitutional and its enactment would be sure to bring on protracted litigation. It is his opinion that the right to an appeal from the decision of a local liquor commission to the State Liquor Commission is o right granted by Illinois statute in an area pre-empted by the state legislature from local home rule poners. For these reasons, we feel that the ordinance sought to be enacted should not be adopted in its present form. Sincerely, Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce CAF/ 8/16/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II ENTITLED "PUBLIC PASSENGER VEHICLES" OF CHAPTER 11 OF THE VILLAGE CODE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Section 11.1136 entitled "Senior Citizen/ Handicapped Subsidized Taxicab Rate Program" of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of the Village of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by substituting therefor an entirely new paragraph A; so that hereinafter said paragraph A of Section 11.1136 shall be and read as follows: A. Rates to be charged persons sixty five (65) years of age or older and handicapped persons shall be as follows: 1. A rate shall be charged by taxicabs licensed to operate in the Village to such persons for transportation based on the fare shown on the taxicab meter; fifty percent (50%) shall be billed to the Village, up to a maximum of Three Dollars ($3.00); and fifty percent (50%) or the balance due shall be paid directly by the rider. 2. When more than one senior citizen and/or handicapped person is transported to the same destination, then each additional person shall be required to pay ten cents ($0.10) in addition to the established rate. 11 SECTION TWO:. That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk I "**Isjq Mount'Prospect Public Works Otpartment 14�INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: August 14, 1990 SUBJ: Brush Chipper Bid Recommendation Sealed bids were opened on July 25, 1990, for a 12" Diameter Disc Brush Chipper. Bid results are attached. Our specifications stated that after the bid opening we could require an on-site demonstration of any unit in contention for bid award. We narrowed the list of those in contention to three bidders based on the following: Vermeer Illinois because theirs is the lowest priced unit meeting specifications, and Aerial Equipment and Alexander Equipment because their bids were lower than Vermeer Illinois. Schuster Equipment's bid, though lower than Vermeer Illinois, was not considered because Aerial Equip- ment offered the same unit at a lower price. We then conducted a thorough test of the three units in conten- tion by chipping a wide variety of landscape waste with each machine. This included logs, long "whippy" material such as Willow branches, short shrub prunings, evergreens, and oddly angled branches. Each unit was also examined thoroughly by our Vehicle Maintenance Superintendent. We completed our investiga- tion by calling other users of each machine. In the end, we concluded that the Vermeer 1250 is best suited for our needs for the following reasons: A. Safety - The Vermeer has by far the longest feed table, keeping the operator the greatest distance from moving parts. (Length of feed table from rotor to end is 94" for Vermeer, 7211 and 7411 for the other units). The Vermeer is also the widest unit, making it easy to see and avoid jack- knifing when backing. B. versatility/Ease of Use - With the new recycling laws it is necessary for us to chip a much wider variety of land- scape waste than in the past. In the past we have always chipped most tree branches, but now we must also chip small shrub prunings, thorny materials, Christmas trees, and oddly shaped pieces that were once hauled to landfills. Therefore, it is important that we purchase a unit that can handle all these materials. The demonstrations, plus our calls to other users, confirmed that the Vermeer can handle a wide variety of materials best. The vertical feed roll- ers in the Vermeer provide an aggressive bite on brush and greater crushing capacity to the diameter and size of the roller. Viney material does not wrap around them and clog up the machine, as we experienced with the horizontal roll- ers on the other two units. The design of the Vermeer feed table plus its automatic feed control feature allows short pieces to be pulled readi- ly into the rollers. The other units often require short pieces to be pushed in with larger pieces. The Aerial Equipment unit, in fact, states on a label above the feed table that short pieces must be pushed in with longer piec- es, or not fed at all. This is an important distinction because when our crews are pruning shrubs, we often do not have longer pieces available. The Vermeer feed opening is also the widest of the three units, which makes it easiest to feed in Christmas trees and wide bushy material. C. Maintenance/Serviceability - The Vermeer has a hinged en- gine cover and allows easy access to all service areas such as filters, fuel lines, cutter wheel, etc. The other units have enclosed engines and access to service areas is diffi- cult. The Vermeer features an outward blowing radiator to prevent plugging from dust, while the other units blow inward and require a special screen to prevent plugging. The cost for replacement blades on the Vermeer is the low- est of the three units. For the above reasons, we feel that the purchase of the Vermeer 1250 would be in the best interests of the Village because of safety, versatility, and serviceability. The unit can be pur- chased without the optional paint because its original color is very close to our standard yellow paint. We also recommend trading in our 1983 Mitts and Merrill brush chipper as part of this bid, plus the purchase of one set of spare parts as listed on the bid sheet. This would bring the total purchase price of $14,069.72. On Page 212 of the 1990-91 budget there is $18,000.00 allocated to replace a Brush Chipper (Acct. #48-077-93-8216). 1 recommend the award of this bid to Vermeer Illinois in the amount of $14,069.72 for a Vermeer 1250 Brush Chipper. NazaggBVI.* 1 HLW/eh Bidder MakWodel Bid Security Base Bid Price Trade-in Ouote Delivery after award Cost using irade4n Optional Equipment 4 Extra blades 1 Extra bed knife 1 extra set titers Options] paint to match PW coke Bid Results Trailer Mounted Brush Chipper 10:00 AM - July 25, 1990 Aerial Schuster Alexander Vermeer Vermeer Lyons Equipment Equipment Equip. Co.. Inc. Itec Illinois Saba/Service Equip. Co. Brush Bandit 200. Brush Bandit 200+ Eager Beaver Wood/Chuck Hy/Roller Vermeer 1250 Vermeer 1250 No bid Certified Check Bid Bond Certified Check Bid Bond Cashlees Check None $ 13.998.00 $ 15,166.00 $ 15,303.00 $ 16,425.00 $ 161600.00 $ 18,300.00 $ 2,050.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 4,400.00 $ 1.853.00 $ 3.000.00 $ 2.300.00 30.45 days 30 days 30 days 30-45 days 30-60 days 80.90 days $ 11,948.00 $ 12,666.00 $ 10,903.00 $ 14,572.00 $ 13,800.00 $ 16.000.00 $ 35 per blade $ 150.00 $ 126.00 $ 200.00 $ 06.91 $ 173.82 $ 200.00 $ 190.00 $ 60.00 $ 175.00 $ 138.04 $ 138.04 $ 65.75 $ 24.00 $ 21.05 $ 29.25 $ 44.77 $ 44.76 $ 190.00 $ 125.00 $ 175.00 N/C $ 450.00 $ 800.00 Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: August 15, 1990 SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Recommendation Truck with Crane On August 14, 1990, sealed bids were opened for the proposed purchase of one 35,000 GVWR truck chassis and cab with crane and flatbed body. This is a replacement unit for a 1978 truck chas- sis and 1979 truck -mounted crane. There were five invitational bids mailed in addition to advertising. Bid results are at- tached. 7 On page 213 of the current budget, there is $63,000 allocated for this purchase under account code 48-077-93-8303. 1 recom- mend acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by Fisher Crane Co. in an amount not to exceed $56,631.25 including trade-in allowance of existing Village -owned unit. �'GJA - W 421 '_'41 - Herbert L. Weeks HLW/td attach. BIDS/TRCK—CRN.RES 8-15-90 BID OPENING SHEET BIDDER: Fischer Crane Co. Freund Int'l Inc. Pollard Motor Co. Runnion Equipment 35000 GVWR Cab & Chassis Make/Model IHC 4900 Int. 4900 Int. 4900 Int. 4900 Flatbed Body Make/Model IMC Hart Loadmaster Knapheide PVMX-103A Knapheide PVMX-103A Midwest H4104 PA Crane Fisher National Crane Make/Model Copma C1230/2S Hiab #140 AW Hiab #140 AW Model N-95 Base Bid $63,631.25 $67,631.43 $67,911,32 $75,377.00 Trade-in Allowance 1978 Village Truck/Crane $7,000 $9,000 $6,000 $9,000 Total Delivered Price w/Trade-in $56,631.25 $58,631.43 $61,911.32 $66,377.00 Delivery 60 - 120 days 90 - 120 days 120 - 150 days 90 days BIDS/TRCK CRN.RES Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1W INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: August 15, 1990 SUBJECT: Sealed Bid Recommendation Tow Truck Chassis and Body On August 14, 1990, sealed bids were opened for the proposed purchase of one 38,000 GVWR truck cab and chassis with a heavy-duty tow body at- tached. Five invitational bids were mailed in addition to advertising as required. Bid results as follows: Make/Model Make/Model Delivery Bidder Truck C/C Tow Body Price Delivery R & R Truck Service Inc. Int. 4900 Vulcan 30.25 $100,450 120 days Mid America Wrecker Sales* to 11 68,150 11 McHenry Truck Equip.Inc* to to 77,196 --- * - no bid bond nor complete bid with cab/chassis On page 212 of the current budget, there is $97,500 allocated for this purchase under account code 48-077-93-8235. The two bids as submitted by Mid America Wrecker Sales and McHenry Truck Equip. Inc. are disqualified as they did not include the truck chassis. It is estimated that the truck chassis as specified would have added an estimated $34,500 to each of their bids. I therefore recommend acceptance of the bid as submitted by R & R Truck Service Inc. in an amount not to exceed $100,450 for an Inter- national truck chassis with a Vulcan tow truck body. HLW/td BIDS/TOWTRUCK.RES Herbert L. Weeks Mount Prospect Public Works Department AdwhL INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO. Village manager FROM. Director Public Works DATE: August 14, 1990 SUBJ. Bid Opening of August 9, 1990 for Open Channel. Flow Monitors <)n August 5, 1990, at 10:00 a.m., Sealed bids were opened for the pxopos�cd -pur onase of 10 open chan,le, f 1 Ow monitors and other associated equipment. These flow monitors are being purchased as a requirement by the MWRD and the ICAP agreement to Monitor our sanitary flows. The monito�-s w1il be maintained and in - Stalled by Villagki Personnel, but the flow data ar,,,jly i done by ouz: S 6 will be Q01.1sulting �-'Dgincers, Donohue 1v.d'AsL;ocj1ar-eS. Bid tabulations are as follows: Bidder Model Bid Amt. Elan Engineering Corp. MOntedOro-Whitney $48,578.00 Lee Engineering Sales I -2 Marsh-MCBirney $A9,905.00 Company Funds for this proposed Purchase are appropriated in the current budget, Page 185, account code 411-072-09-8003 $50,000. in the amount of I reccm-meAd acceptance of 'he bid as ing Corp. $48,578.00. slubmitted by Elan Engineer- Herbert L. Weeks HLW/eh MONITORR.EC MAYOR GERALD I. FARLEY TRUSTEES RALPH W ARTHUR MARK W BUSSE T IM OTHYJ CORCORAN LEO FLOP OS GEORGE P VAN GEEM THEODORE J WATTENSERC Village of Mount Prospect VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON VILLAGE CLERK 100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 CAROL A FIELDS Phone: 708 / 392-6000 TO: Village Manager — Fax: 70B / 392-E022 41 FROM: Project Engineer DATE: August 14, 1990 SUBJECT: 1990 M.F.T. General Maintenance Program Attached is a Supplemental Resolution for Maintenance of Streets and Highway By Municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code in the amount of $356,000.00. The Illinois Dept. of Transportation requires this resolution so that the Village may use motor fuel tax funds. I recommend that the Mayor and Board of Trustees adopt this resolution at the August 21st, 1990 Board Meeting. Listed below are the M.F.T. accounts that will be affected by this resolution: 1. 22-071-05-7401 Salt/Calc Chloride Pg. 153 $ 25,000 2. 22-071-14-6235 Traffic Light Maint. Pg. 165 21,000 3. 22-071-14-6238 Traffic Light Energy Pg. 165 44,000 4. 22-071-14-8106 Opticon Signalization Pg. 165 41,000 5. 22-071-04-8510 Street Reconstruction Pg. 156 225,000* Total $ 356,000 Please note that only a portion of Account #22-071-04-8610 Street Reconstruction is requested at this time. The remainder will be requested when the next street reconstruction project is developed. The amount requested at this time will be used to repair Emerson Street from Busse Ave. to Central Rd. Fred Tenny!P FT/m xc: Director of Inspection Services Director of Public Works Village Clerk Ioull 1w, 100� U!W OR Resolution for Maintb..dnce of Streets and Highways ,�nToD a - is S;p rtM(- ran ortabon By Municipality Under the Illinois Highway Code BE IT RESOLVED, by the of the (Council or President and Board of Trustees) Village of Mount Prospect Illinois, that there is hereby (C ty, Town or village) (Name) appropriated the sum of$ $356t000.00 of Motor Fuel Tax funds for the purpose of maintaining streets and highways under the applicable provisions of the Illinois Highway Code, from January 1, 19.9�a_ to December 31, 19-9.0. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that only those streets, highways, and operations as listed and described on the ap- proved Municipal Estimate of Maintenance Costs, including supplemental or revised estimates approved in connec- tion with this resolution, are eligible for maintenance with Motor Fuel Tax funds during the period as specified above. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall, as soon as practicable after the close of the period as given above, submit to the Department of Traosportation, on forms furnished by said Department, a certified statement showing expenditures from and balances remaining in the account(s) for this period; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk shall immediately transmit two certified copies of this resolution to the district office of the Department of Transportation, at Schaumburg , Illinois. a %RX Clerk in and forthe V311age Mrs. (City. Town or Village) Mount Prcspect , County of Cook hereby certify the foregoing to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by the Mayor And Board of Trustees ata meeting on A1191ASt 21 -19_9a. (Council or President and Board of Trustees) IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this —day of A.D. 19 90 (SEAL) BLR 4123 (Rev. 6/87) IL 494-0354 Village ..- Clerk (City, Town or Village) APPROVED 19 - Department of Transportation District Engineer Village of Mount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Engineering coordinator DATE: August 3, 1990 SUBJECT: LINCOLN ST. BRIDGE REPAIR On April 17, 1990, the Village Board awarded a contract for the subject project to Albin Carlson & Company. The awarded contract was for $65,900.00. In a June 6, 1990 memo to you from the Director of Inspection Services, a request was made to perform additional• repair to the concrete deck and to replace the entire top layer of reinforcing bars. This additional work was estimated to cost $3,975.80. All work related to this contract is now complete. Final tabulation of as -built quantities brings the final total cost to $70,705.50. A higher than estimated amount of asphalt surface was necessary to improve the bridge approach drainage. Request is to approve the final amount and extend the -existing purchase order to cover the cost. With the completion of the construction, our contract with our consultant, Donohue & Assoc., is also complete. once they submit their final invoice, I believe a Supplemental M.F.T. Resolution will be required to complete our I.D.O.T. requirements. Rnob Bob BP/m xc: Director of Inspection Services Director of Public works Village of rJount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Mr, John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager FROM: Chuck 8encio, Inspection Services Director DATE: June 0, 1990 RE' LINCOLN ST. BRIDGE Attached find a copy of a letter from Donohue Engineers regarding the Lincoln 3t- Bridge' During removal of the deck on Lincoln 8t. Bridge, it was found the concrete deck had deteriorated substantially more than anticipated by Donohue. The deck has deteriorated to the point where the top layer of reinforcing bars have rusted out. The - Engineer has recommended and l concur that these reinforcing bars should be replaced. The cost of the additional re -bars and concrete work is estimated at $3,975.80. - . ` 4ruv7- Chuck 8encfc�� /r�` , . CB:rm ��fr�'e Attach. `�-/ cc: Engineering Engfneering Pile " U 4ruv7- ��fr�'e 67,,4_' . `�-/ -1 —1.0w1v I I r.4JrQ�' A Requisition Information PW—INSPECTION SERV ES/ENG. DEPARTMENT DATE INITIATED REQUISITIONED BY: C/6 OTHER VENDORS: DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT - -1 - - - 4/25/1990 NAME PRICE NAME PRICE REASON ORDER PLACED WITH SUCCESSFUL BIDDER Lowest Price Duality Best Defy Service Only Source Best Design 13 n 1:1 D n f-1 OTHER REASONS PURCHASE ORDER VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILL. DATE APRIL 25, 1990 100 S. EMERSON $T. ITHIS ORDER -=.. -L1.MUST 14 -DP P.r.-T.-.WL' MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 00056 Phone: (708) 392-6000 jiA s -c- 1; ORDER NO, 34205 RED. NO, 20/APRIL ALBIN CARLSON & CO. S F VILLAGE OPF MOUNT PROSPECT 3000 LANE STREET H 100 S. EMERSON STREET 6 MELROSE PARK, IL 60160 P' MOUNT PROSPECT, IL 60056 T - 0 ENGINEERING L L ALL INVOICES AND STATEMENTS MUST BE I THIS PURCHASE IS NOT SUBJECT TO SALES TAX � THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS SUBJECT TO THE MAILED To THE ABOVE ADDRESS ATTN: EXEMPTION NUMBER CONDITIONS STATED ON THE REVERSE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE E9M-1415-01 I SIDE THEREOF. ACCOUNT CODE R OTY DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES UNIT TOTAL PRICE PACKING SLIP: To Accompany Shipment or Mailed Same Day Shipment is Made. ORIGINAL VILL4GE OF MPJ�r R SPECT FINANCE DIRECTOR A E OF MOUNT PROSPeCT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: AUGUST 15, 1990 SUBJECT: PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT SENIOR CENTER LOT AND V & G PRINTERS SITE As you directed, and pursuant to our parking study, I have looked into costs to consolidate the former site of V & G Printers with the parking lots at the Senior Center and Prospect Medical Center. I have talked with three engineering companies in order to examine the scope of the work, and preliminary construction costs. Fletcher Engineering believes that we can consolidate the V & G site with the existing parking lots for approximately $70,000. This includes work at the Senior Center lot necessary to resolve a grade change, and all physical improvements to provide a larger, unified parking lot. Fletcher Engineering would perform necessary field work, prepare design alternatives for consideration, and prepare construction plans and specifications. Fletcher's fee for this project would be $9,500. Fletcher provided the lowest quote for this project. It is our goal to complete the project this year. Accordingly, staff would recommend that the Village Board enter into an agreement with Fletcher Engineering in the amount of $9,500 for this project. FLETCHER ENGINEERING COMI_N A,IAES I MULDOWNEY. PE_ PRESIDENT CONSULTING ENGINEERS OEL J MICHALIK, PE , VICE PRESIDENT CLARE P MULDOWNEY, SECY/TREAS MARY E MITCRAJ, ASST SEC Y 'TREAS Village of,, Pros;ea August 8, 1990 D) AUG S 1990 Mr. David M. Clements, AICP Director of Planning and Zoning Village of Mount Prospect 100 S. Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 Re: Proposed Parking Lot Reconstruction & Expansion Main Street at Busse Ave. Mount Prospect, Illinois Dear Mr. Clements: DAVID A ANDERSEN C E STEPHEN I CROSS C E ,MARY FRANCES DE FRANK C E RICHARD P FLETCHER C E LINA FOWLER C E BRIAN A SCH I EBER C E 0H6-20 H 6 - 2 0 For the referenced project we shall be pleased to provide professional civil engineering services as set forth below: A. Basic Services: 1. Perform field survey and prepare topographic survey for exist- ing parking lot, vacant V&G Lot and approximately 1/2 of Senior Center Parking Lot. 2. Prepare preliminary drawings of alternates for the proposed parking expansion. 3. Prepare construction plans, specifications and opinion of probable cost and field staking for the proposed parking lot reconstruction and expansion. B. Payment for Services: 1, For services described in Paragraph A, our fee shall be billed at the rates listed on the attached schedule. 2. It is estimated that our fee for the services described in Paragraph A.1 will not exceed $1,500.00 3. It is estimated that our fee for the services described in Paragraph A.2 will not exceed $2,000.00 4. It is estimated that our fee for the services described in Paragraph A.3 will not exceed $6,000.00 5. Additional work not described in this proposal will be performed on request, by the signer of this agreement, at the rates listed in the attached schedule. 5999 NEW WILKE ROAD -SUITE 300 -ROLLING MEADOWS, ILLINOIS 60008-4503 -PHONE 708/593-0330 -FAX 708/593-0341 OMB -21 Mr. David M. Clements August 8, 1990 Page 2 C. Special Provisions, Exhibits and Schedules. 1, The following Exhibits are attached and made part of this agree- ment: Exhibit A: Rate Schedule 2. It is assumed that a Metropolitan Water Reclamation District permit will not be required for the proposed work and therefore our fees do not include the services needed to obtain such a permit. 3. Our fees do not include construction inspection since this will be performed by village forces. We sincerely appreciate this opportunity to offer our services and hope it merits approval and acceptance. Upon receipt of one signed copy of this agreement (the second is for your files), we will begin our work. Very truly yours, FLETCHER ENGINEERING COMPANY Joel Michalik Vice President ACCEPTED: BY: (Signature) (Name & Title) DATE: ,4 FLETCHER ENGINEERING COM" I;MES I MULDCM-4Y PE PRESIDEN7 coNsuLnNC ENCINEERS DAVID A ANDFRSE% C E I�KL I MICHAL11, PE VICE,PPESIDEWT STEPHEN; CROSS C E CLARE P PAULDOrNEY SEC'YnWAS MARY FRANCES Of FRANK C I MARY E PAITORAI ASST SECWTREAS RICHARD P FLETCHER- C E C .ANA FICIVUR. CE BRIANA SCIIEWR C E 32-116 January 1, 1990 RATE SCHEDULE FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES Principal Engineer $ 95.20 Per Hour Senior Engineer 78.55 " Design Engineer 50.00 78.55 " Resident Engineer 50.05 " Chief Draftsman 50.05 " Field Engineer (Party Cheif) 50.05 " Field Engineer 28.65 50.05 " Surveyor 61.05 " Instrument Man 33.90 44.15 " Rod Man 25.10 33.90 " Civil Engineering Draftsman 11 33.90 50.05 " Civil Engineering Draftsman 1 25.10 28.65 " Secretary 25.10 51.00 " General Office Personnel 25.10 " Computer (Equipment Only) 100.00 Flow Meter (Equipment Only) 40.00 Transportation 3.85 Blueprints & Sepias, Supplies, Printing, Outside Consulting Services, Telephone, Shipping, Etc. Cost + 35% PLEASE NOTE: There will be an additional 1.5% service charge per month added to any unpaid balance over thirty (30) days. 5999 NEWIWILKE ROAD - SUITE 300 - ROLUNG MEADOWS, IWNOIS 60008-4503 - PHONE 708/593-0330 - FAX 708/593-0341 NORTWEST `MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE AUCTION PAYMENT POLICY I. Title to a purchased vehicle will be transferred at the time of the auction only upon receipt of cash or certified check for the amount of the vehicle(s) purchased. 2. I£ payment is made by personal check, bankcard check, traveler's check or other similar method, proper identification will be required. Title to such vehicle(s) will be transferred only upon receipt by the Conference of the required funds. Sale of the vehicle(s) is conditional upon full payment. 3. Buyers may redeem titles in person at the Northwest 'lunicipal Conference offices, or elect to have titles sent certified mail. Proof of purchase is required if titles are redeemed in person. A $10.00 fee is charged for titles sent certified mail. Payment of this fee is required at the time of vehicle purchase. Titles will be available be— ginning the third week after the auction. NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE Oakton College Campus 1616 E. Golf Road Des Plaines, IL 60016 OFFICE HOURS: Monday through Friday 8:30 A.M. to 5:00 P.M. STATDIENT OF PROCEDURES AT N.W.M.C. AUCTIONS. 1. REGISTRATION: All who intend to bid on any item must register In the cash room before the start of the auction at 11:00 AM. Registrants shall receive a bid card authorizing the priviledge to bid. Registrants shall provide name, home address, home and work phone numbers and drivers license number. Registrants assume full responsibility for their bid card and all sales attributed to the card. 2. ORAL BIDS: Oral bids will be solicited through public auction commencing at 11:00 AM, Saturday, Bids shall only be recognized from registered persons holding a bid card (see section 1). 3. MINIMUM PRICE: Minimum prices shall be established for all vehicles by the participating agency prior to the bidding. Minimum pricing shall not be made public. The amount of any acceptable bid must be equal or higher than the minimum price established. 4. BID AWARD AND TRANSFER OF TITLE: Award will be made to the highest bidder, provided the bid is equal to or higher than the minimum price which will be set by the respective municipality prior to bidding. All bid awards and sales by the auctioneer will he binding and final upon both the buyer and seller. Ownership shall transfer to the purchaser upon the signing of the Purchase—Sales Agreement and following the procedures in paragraph #7. 5. INSPECTION OF VEHICLES: Vehicles may be inspected at the 9:00 A.M. — 10:30 A.M. the day of the auction. Vehicles cannot be driven. Some vehicles will have keys in them and can be started during inspection. Some vehicles will not have keys. The decision on whether or not keys will be available is made by the selling agency. Since bidders have limited opportunity to inspect these vehicles, bidder shall agree that the inspection afforded them is sufficient for them to offer a bid and that any defect discovered subsequent to the sale, whether or not known by the seller and whether or not this defect was communicated to the buyer, shall be the sole responsibility of the buyer. 6. WARRANTY: These vehicles have been used for governmental activities, which include police patrol and administrative use, and vary in age, condition, and mileage. No warranty is therefore made, expressed, or implied, oral or written, as to the condition of these vehicles. As such, the vehicles will be sold on an "as is," basis. J. MANNER OF PAYMENT: Title to a purchased vehicle will be transferred at the time of the auction only upon receipt of cash or certified check for the amount of the vehicle(s) purchased. If payment is made by personal check, bankcard check, traveler's check or other similar method, proper identification will be required. Title to such vehicle(s) will be transferred only upon receipt by the Conference of the required funds. See Payment Policy on front page for information on title transfer. Sale of the vehicle(s) is conditional upon full payment. All vehicles must be removed from the Auction site no later than t2 noon on the Tuesday following the auction. All vehicles become the sole responsibility of the buyer upon the signing of the Purchase—Sales Agreement and the will assume no liability whatsoever for any vehicle parked or left at the auction cite after the Purchase—Sales Agreement has been signed. 8- PURCHASE AND SALES AGREEMENT: Since both the buyers and the sellers will be required to execute Purchase and Sales Agreements, all buyers must be least 18 years of age. The Conference reserves the right to reject any bid if the Conference deems it is in the best interest of the participants to do so. 9. LICENSE PLATES: It is unlawful to dirve a vehicle without a license plate. Purchasers shall be responsible for the cost of license plates as well as the cost of transferring title. These vehicles do not now have license plates. License plates will not be available for sale on the premises. 10. LIST OF EQUIPMENT TO BE SOLD: A list of the vehicles to be sold is available at the auction site. Northwest !1unicipal Conference reserves the right to make changes to or add or delete vehicles to the list without notice. 11. METHOD OF AWARD: The auctioneer used by the Conference shall have authority to declare a vehicle sold and to designate the party to whom the vehicle has been sold. Such designation shall be made by him to the highest bidder following auctioning of that vehicle. A bid after the auctioneer has declared that item sold shall be rejected. Any successful bidder failing to pay for a vehicle sold to him or her shall be responsible for any additional expense of reselling that item including the difference between the agreed sales price and the amount realized through resale of that vehicle. 12. REMOVAL OF VEHICLES & EQUIPMENT: All vehicles and equipment must be removed from the grounds of the Auction site by 12 noon, or the Tuesday following the auction 13. USED CAR SALES TAX: Illinois state law requires a used car buyer to pay a sales tax on the purchase price of used used vehicles. Payment of sales taxes is the responsbility of the buyer. Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager c: Dave Jepson FROM: Director Public Works DATE: August 7, 1990 SUBJECT: NWMC Auction of Surplus Property The Northwest Municipal Conference is scheduling a public auc- tion for municipally -owned equipment on Saturday, September 29, 1990. Per our conversation, I have volunteered the use of our Public Works facility for that event, which will exempt us from the 10% auctioneer's fee., The following equipment is recommended to be offered for sale: Village Min.Selling ID No. Year -Description Price 307A 1983 Chev. Cavalier Sta. Wagon $300 308A 1984 Chev. Celebrity Sedan 350 2718A 1982 Chev. 4 whl dr 3/4 ton pickup truck 300 2734A 1981 Chev. 4 whl dr 3/4 ton pickup truck 300 4508A 1979 Toro Groundsmaster lawn tractor 100 4550 1974 Etnyre asphalt maintenance unit 50 1972 Layton asphalt spreader box 50 The cars, trucks and lawn tractor are units which have been replaced. The asphalt maintenance unit and the asphalt spreader box are deteriorated pieces of equipment which haven't been used in over five years. An ordinance designating this equipment as surplus and allowing it to be offered for sale to the highest bidders at a public auction will have to be passed prior to the auction. The ordi- nance as drafted will allow the Village Manager to sell the surplus equipment at either a Mount Prospect or Evanston auc- tion. I recommend passage of this ordinance. If there are less than 60 vehicles scheduled for the Mount Prospect auction, that sale will be canceled, and the Conference will sponsor only the auction in Evanston at a later date. If that would happen, the Village of Mount Prospect would have to pay only a 5% commission versus the standard 10% all other communities have to pay. rl 10 W111 w2ard � � 4 i ww,,O� I HLW/td attach. AUCTION.'90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES the day of 1990 Published in pamphlet form by authority of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois, the day of , 1990. ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE BY PUBLIC AUCTION OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate authori- ties of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no longer necessary or useful to or for the best interests of said jurisdiction to retain ownership of the personal property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to sell said personal property at public auction. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROPSECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: Pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois Municipal Code, Illinois Revised Statutes, C24, Section 11-76-4, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the following de- scribed personal property: Vehicle I.D. No. Year Make Model Min. Value 307A 1983 Chev. Cavalier Sta. Wgn. $300 308A 1984 Chev. Celebrity Sedan 350 2718A 1982 Chev. K20 3/4 ton P/U truck 300 2734A 1981 Chev. K20 3/4 ton P/U truck 300 4508A 1979 Toro Groundsmaster 72 tractor 100 4550 1974 Etnyre MU4TRL asphalt maint. unit 50 N/A 1972 Layton Asphalt spreader box 50 now owned by said jurisdiction, is no longer necessary or useful to the jurisdiction, and the interests of the jurisdiction would be best served by its sale. SECTION TWO: Pursuant to said Section 11-76-4, the village Manager is hereby authorized and directed to sell the aforementioned personal proper- ty now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect at public auction to the highest bidder. Said property shall be sold at either of the following scheduled auctions. 11:00 AM Saturday, September 29, 1990 at the Mt. Prospect Public Works Facility 11:00 AM Saturday, October 27, 1990 at the Evanston Public Works Center The Village Manager is authorized to determine at which auction said prop- erty shall be sold. SECTION THREE: The Village Manager is hereby authorized and may direct the Northwest Municipal Conference to advertise the sale of the aforemen- tioned personal property in a newspaper published within the community before the date of said public auction. SECTION FOUR: The Village Manager is hereby authorized and may direct the Northwest Municipal Conference to enter into an agreement for the sale of said personal property. The Auction shall be conducted in the manner set forth in the Specifications for the sale of vehicles attached hereto and made a part of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: No bid which is less than the minimum value set forth in the list of property to be sold shall be accepted, unless a lower amount is authorized by the Village Manager or his representative at the auction. SECTION SIX: Upon payment of the full auction price, the Village Manag- er is hereby authorized and directed to convey and transfer title to the aforesaid personal property to the successful bidder. SECTION SEVEN: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage by a vote of at least three-fourths of the corporate authorities and approval in the manner provided by law. AYES: R ABSENT: PASSED AND APPROVED THIS day of , 1990 ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk AUCTN90.oRD Gerald L. Farley Village President I AUCTION INVENTORY FORM NAME: Herbert Weeks, Public Works JURISDICTION: Mount Prospect ADDRESS 1700 W. Central Rd. PHONE: 708/870-5640 2 Mount Prospect, IL 60056 1- urur, DGJL t11YJ WL.L\ rVL! Gt11. 11 JLt111,1'1 i:. lYl D�LIIW. We would prefer to participate in the .., X September 29 - Mount Prospect October 27 - Evanston If we cannot participate in preferred auction, we X would would not want to be included in the alternate auction SERIAL NUMBER TYPE OF VEHICLE ear truck a ui YEAR MAKE MODEL MILEAGE # OF DOORS TRANS. auto/man # OF CLYND. AIR COND. r"IMU" RCE OIHEK LUMMUW) Cavalier to 4 Yes $3fl0 #307] IGIAC35P4DJ110013 Sta.Wagon Car '83 Chev. Celebrityto K20 K12 to 6 8 Yes No 350 300 #308A b , wheel drive 1GIAW19X7E6889563 IGCGK4M3CJ111061 Car 4x4P/U 314ton 184 182 Chev Chev Chev K20 to 8 No 300 34] wltool box, #27hep] drive 1 I 1GCGK24MIBJ164663 4x4P/U 3/4ton '81 4 No 100 #4508A MowerJSnowblower 9022530780 Tractor 79 Toro Grounds-dro- master 72tatic - - - 50 #4550 trailer -mounted needs work Asphalt Main- tenance Unit Asphalt S reader Box '74 172 Etnyre Layton MU4TRL none --- --- M-2376 - -�- - 50 H -4799E-2