HomeMy WebLinkAbout3778_001Next Ordinance No. 4210
Next Resolution No. 32-90
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
A G 3 N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U 8 1 N E 8 8
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date and AUGUST 7, 1990
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center August 7, 1990
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "SkipOO Parley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Corcoran
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, July 17, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. Presentation of Retirement Plaque to Iry Stark,
Foreman in the'Public Works Department following
16 years of service.
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF REFORMING THE HIGHWAY
BEAUTIFICATION ACT
This Resolution supports the regulation and
removal of billboards along roadways.
(Exhibit A)
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
(ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance creates a Class 11R11 liquor
license for Dragon City Restaurant located in the
Brentwood Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads
(Exhibit B)
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
(ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES)
VERAGES) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance creates a Class "C" liquor
license for a retail packaged goods store,
to be located in the Brentwood Square
Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads.
(Exhibit C)
D. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION
13.124 OF CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES) OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance provides for an appeal from the
decision of the Local Liquor commissioner to
the Circuit Court of Cook County, as well as
establishing the requirement to post a notice
of closure on any establishment due to revocation
of the local liquor license. (Exhibit D)
E. Ratification of action taken relative to the
salary increase for the Village Manager
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church
1400 East Kensington Road
At the request of the Petitioner, this matter
has been referred to the August 21st meeting
of the Village Board.
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT (443 West Rand Road)
This Ordinance authorizes the sale of property
owned by the village, 443 West Rand Road, through
sealed bids. (Exhibit E)
C. ZBA 47-V-90, 1727 Bonita
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1727 BONITA
This Ordinance grants a variation to permit
a driveway 29 feet wide and a service walk 8 feet
wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit F)
D. ZBA 49 -SU -90 and ZBA 50-V-90, 1420 W. Lincoln Street
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1420 W. LINCOLN STREET
This Ordinance grants a special use to permit
a 3 car garage and a variation to permit a
driveway 30 feet in width. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting these requests by
a vote of 6-0.
E. ZBA 51-Z-90 and ZBA 52 -SU -90, 1920 W. Golf Road
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance rezones the subject property
from R -X to R-1, Single Family Residence
District, to permit the construction of four
single family homes. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 6-0. Due to the fact that the road
will be established as a private roadway on
the Plat of Subdivision, the request for a
Special Use has been withdrawn.
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
(TRAFFIC CODE)
This Ordinance establishes a weight limitation
on Briarwood Drive East and West.
B. ZBA 45-V-90, 519 S. Edward Street
The Petitioner is requesting variations to
permit a, driveway 17 feet wide, a zero foot
front setback and 0.5 foot side yard in order
to have a parking pad. The Zoning Board of
Appeals Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 5-0.
C. ZBA 53-V-90, 319 S. Beverly
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit
a 6 foot side yard in order to construction a room
addition. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 5-0.
(Exhibit G)
(Exhibit H)
(Exhibit J)
D. ZBA 54-V-90 and ZBA 55 -SU -90, 32 S. Busse Road
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a 60 foot turn -around in a driveway and a special
use to permit a 3 -car garage. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests by a
vote of 4-0.
E. ZBA 56-V-90, 112 N. Eastwood
The petitioner is requesting a variation to permit
a 2 foot side yardand15 foot height for a new
garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting the side yard variation by a vote of 4-1
and 5-0 to grant the height variation.
F. ZBA 57-V-90, 20 Audrey Lane
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit
an 1811 side yard setback and 30 foot driveway, at
the widest point, for a parking apron. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote Of 5-0-
G. ZBA 58-V-90, 613 N. Russel
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit a
16.5 foot wide driveway and a 2.5 foot side yard for
a parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0.
H. ZBA 59-V-90, 730 E. Northwest Highway
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit a
zero foot front yard, a 2.5 foot side yard, 100 %
lot surface coverage and 10 parking spaces, instead
of the required 21, accommodate an addition to this
law firm building. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by a vote of 5-0.
I. ZBA 61-V-90, 802 Dresser Drive
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit
a 31 611 side yard in order to replace an existing
patio. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 4-0.
J. ZBA 62-V-90, 609 Noah Terrace
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a 15 foot rear yard for a room addition.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 4-0.
K. ZBA 63-V-90, 607 Noah Terrace
The petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a 15 foot rear yard for a room addition.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 4-0.
L. ZBA 65-V-90, 1307 E. Ardyce Lane
The petitioner is requesting a variation to
allow a 51 separation between an existing deck
and proposed family room. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 4-0.
M. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN
ADVISORY REFERENDUM FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A
PUBLIC QUESTION OF THE BALLOT FOR THE
NOVEMBER 6, 1990 ELECTION
This Ordinance authorizes a question on the
November, 1990 ballot as to whether the
residents would support the construction of
a new Public Safety Building at a cost of (Exhibit K)
$6,992,000.
N. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO
THE AGREEMENT WITH NORTHWEST CENTRAL
DISPATCH SYSTEM
This Resolution amends the agreement with the
Northwest Central Dispatch System to include
the Village of Palatine as a member.
O. A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM OF NEW
MEMBERSHIP IN THE ENHANCED 9-1-1 SYSTEM
This Resolution authorizes an amendment to
the Enhanced 9-1-1 System to include -the
City of Prospect Heights and the Village of
Palatine.
P. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II
OF CHAPTER 2 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This ordinance clarifies the language as to the
declaration of votes necessary for passage of
various items before the Village Board.
Q. A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE SOLID WASTE
AGENCY NORTHERN COOK COUNTY TRANSFER STATION
This Resolution supports the transfer site
proposed at the intersection of River and
Central Roads in unincorporated Cook County.
R. Busse Road Industrial Park Plat of Resubdivision
This Plat creates 6 commercial lots in the
development formerly known as the Rosenow Property.
The Plan Commission recommended approving this
resubdivision by a vote of 6-0.
S. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
SALE OF PERSONAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE
This Ordinance authorizes the sale of a 1975
Fire Department pumper, which was recently
replaced.
X. VILLAGE MANAGEROS REPORT
A. Bids:
1. Route 83 watermain replacement
2. Prospect Avenue Reconstruction
3. Elevated work platform
B. Sewer Rehabilitation, Village and Prospect
Meadows systems
C. Authorize payment to Camiros Marketing Survey
for the downtown redevelopment area.
D. Waive bidding procedure for leak detection
equipment.
E. Change Order - Watermain on Oak and Council
Trail
F. Authorize execution of labor contract for
Public Works Department
G. Request to authorize an increase to the
50/50 sidewalk replacement program contract
H. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
(Exhibit L)
(Exhibit M)
(Exhibit N)
(Exhibit 0)
(Exhibit P)
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JULY 17, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
$568,742
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to
order at 7:30 P.M.
10,141
ROLL CALL
59,857
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Trustee
Ralph Arthur
5,890
Trustee
Mark Busse
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
Trustee
Leo Floros
-
Trustee
Theodore Wattenberg
Special Service Area Const. #5
Absent: Trustee
Timothy Corcoran
-
Trustee
George Van Geem,
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
INVOCATION
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
The invocation was given by Trustee
Arthur.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Escrow Deposit Fund
16,351
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee
Wattenberg, moved
APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of
MINUTES
the Mayor and Board of Trustees held July 3, 1990.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse,
Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Motion carried.
accept the financial report dated June
30, 1990,
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee
Busse,
APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the following list
of bills:
General Fund
$568,742
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
300,000
Community Development Block Grant Fund
10,141
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
59,857
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
44,412
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
377,174
Parking System Revenue Fund
5,890
Risk Management Fund '
76,967
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
139
Special Service Area Const. #5
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
1,525
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
-
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
172,127
Flexcomp Trust Fund
5,025
Escrow Deposit Fund
16,351
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
2167
$1,641,121
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Farley
Nays: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
accept the financial report dated June
30, 1990,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
PRESENTATIONS: mayor Farley presented trophies to the following
BEST FLOATS, float entries in the July 4, 1990 parade:
JULY 4, 1990
1st Place Mount Prospect Rotary Club
2nd Place Daily Herald
3rd Place mount Prospect Girl Scouts
of America
TOM ABRAMS Tom Abrams presented the annual Tom Abrams Trophy to
TROPHY: JACK Jack Keefer. Mr. Abrams noted that the trophy is
KEEFER awarded to the person or organization that epitomizes
community involvement.
HOMETOWN DAYS: Janet Hansen, Director of the Mount Prospect Chamber
DONATION of Commerce, invited the Board and residents to attend
the annual Hometown Days celebration, which will take
place July 28 and 29 on Prospect Avenue.
Mrs. Hansen stated that the merchants have a budget of
$15,000 but have found themselves short by $2,800 and
asked that the Village sponsor the kiddie rides.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
authorize an expenditure of $2,800 to pay for the
kiddie rides at the annual Mount Prospect Hometown
Days.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
AMEND CH. 13 MAYOR'S REPORT
CLASS "R" An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
DRAGON CITY create a Class "C" liquor license for the Dragon City
Page 2 - July 17, 1990
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Dolores Haugh, President of the Historical
Society,stated that the Mount Prospect Historical
museum has received an Honorable Mention in the
Governor's Hometown Awards. She also noted that the
garden will be planted soon, with the Klehms of
Barrington donating the plants.
HISTORICAL
Dolores Haugh presented the following bid results
MUSEUM:
for a new asphalt roof on the historical museum at 101
ROOF BIDS
South Maple Street, and since the Village holds title
to the property, it would be appropriate for the
Village Board to formerly accept any
and all bids on this building:
Bidder Amount
Prate $12,955
Superior Interiors $16,625
Lindholm $13,880
Amsterdam Roofing $ 9,927
AMSTERDAM
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ROOFING
to accept the low qualified bid submitted by Amsterdam
Roofing in the amount of $9,927 for an asphalt roof on
the Historical Museum, 101 S. Maple Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
It was also noted that requests for bids to paint the
museum will be sent out soon and those bids will be
presented for Village Board approval.
AMEND CH. 13 MAYOR'S REPORT
CLASS "R" An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
DRAGON CITY create a Class "C" liquor license for the Dragon City
Page 2 - July 17, 1990
Restaurant and a Class 11R11 liquor license for a
UNITED LIQUOR
packaged goods store known as United Liquor Mart,
MART
both establishments will be located within the
NORTHWEST
Brentwood Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads.
ASSEMBLY OF
This ordinance will be presented for second reading
GOD CHURCH
on August 7th.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH. 13
would amend Chapter 13 by creating a Class 11R11 liquor
license for Giordano's Restaurant, 1800 S. Elmhurst
CLASS 11R11
Road.
GIORDANO'S
It was noted that this is the second Giordano's
SELL VILLAGE
Restaurant in the Village, the other establishment
PROPERTY:
being located on Rand Road.
443 W.RAND RD
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ORD.NO. 4205
for passage of ordinance No. 4205
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE
CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floras, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Lil Floras, Chairman of the Diamond Fest Committee,
DIAMOND
gave a report on the first meeting of this Committee
FEST
which will plan various activities involved with the
75th Anniversary of the incorporation of the Village
of Mount Prospect.
Mrs. Floras stated that the official name of the
MOUNT PROSPECT
Committee is the Mount Prospect 75th Anniversary
75TH
Committee and that it was a productive meeting.
ANNIVERSARY
COMMITTEE
OLD BUSINESS
ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church
ZBA 31-V-90
1400 East Kensington Road
NORTHWEST
An Ordinance was presented for second reading
ASSEMBLY OF
that would grant variations to permit construction
GOD CHURCH
of a church sanctuary and related facilities.
Inasmuch as 2 Trustees announced they would be
absent from this meeting, a'motion of the Board was
adopted continuing further discussion on this case
to the August 7th meeting of the Village Board.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
SELL VILLAGE
would authorize the sale of real property owned by
PROPERTY:
the Village and known as 443 West Rand Road through
443 W.RAND RD
sealed bids.
Due to the fact that there were questions regarding
this property and the fact that 2 Trustees announced
they would be absent from this meeting, action on
this Ordinance was continued to the August 7th
meeting of the Village Board.
Page 3 - July 17, 1990
ZBA 41-V-90 ZBA 41-V-96, 2016 Hopi Lane
2016 HOPI LANE An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to allow a 40% impervious lot surface
coverage in the front yard, rather than the permitted
35%, in order to replace an existing circular driveway.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the
request being the subject of ZBA 41-V-90.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO- 4207 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4207
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2016 HOPI LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 42-V-90 ZBA 42-V-90, 107 West Orchard Place
107 ORCHARD PL An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to permit a driveway 16.5 feet wide
and to permit a side yard setback of 1.5 feet in order
to replace an existing driveway. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote
of 6-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Busse,
Page 4 -'July 17, 1990
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 38 -SU -90
ZBA 38 -SU -90 and ZBA 39-V-90, 1200-1380 S. Elmhurst Rd.
ZBA 39-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
1200 S. ELMHURST
would amend the Ordinance governing the Huntington
Commons Planned Unit Development. This Ordinance would
allow the construction of 86 garages for the Huntington
Square Apartments and reduce the number of parking
spaces for the apartments to 504 spaces. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests
by a vote of 6-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Busse,
seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4206
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4206
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2414 GRANTING
A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE HUNTINGTON COMMONS
DEVELOPMENT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floras, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 41-V-90 ZBA 41-V-96, 2016 Hopi Lane
2016 HOPI LANE An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to allow a 40% impervious lot surface
coverage in the front yard, rather than the permitted
35%, in order to replace an existing circular driveway.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the
request being the subject of ZBA 41-V-90.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO- 4207 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4207
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2016 HOPI LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 42-V-90 ZBA 42-V-90, 107 West Orchard Place
107 ORCHARD PL An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to permit a driveway 16.5 feet wide
and to permit a side yard setback of 1.5 feet in order
to replace an existing driveway. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote
of 6-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Busse,
Page 4 -'July 17, 1990
seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ORD.NO. 4208
for passage of Ordinance No. 4208
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 107 W. ORCHARD PLACE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 43-V-90, 203 North Russel
ZBA 43-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
203 N.RUSSEL
would grant variations to allow a side yard %
setback of 1.681, a 31 rear yard setback, and an
impervious lot surface coverage of 47.5%, instead
of the permitted 45% in order to construct a garage.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
the side yard setback and impervious lot coverage
by a vote of 5-1 and grant a 3 foot rear yard
setback by a vote of 6-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ORD.NO. 4209
for passage of Ordinance No. 4209
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 203 NORTH RUSSEL STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 47-V-90, 1727 Bonita ZBA 47-V-90
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit 1727 BONITA
a driveway 29 feet wide and a service walk 8 feet
wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these variations by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the variations requested in
ZBA 47-V-90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented August 7th for first
reading.
Page 5 - June 17, 1990
ZBA 49 -SU -90
ZBA 49 -SU -90 and 50-V-90, 1420 W. Lincoln Street
ZBA 50-V-90
The Petitioner is requesting,a special use to permit
1420 W.LINCOLN
a 3 car garage and variations to permit a driveway 30,
feet wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the special use and variations
requested in ZBA 49 -SU -90 and ZBA 50-V-90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading on
August 7th.
ZBA 51-Z-90
ZBA 51-Z-90 and ZBA 52 -SU -90, 1920 W. Golf Road
ZBA 52-V-90
The Petitioner is request rezoning from R -X to R-1
1920 W.GOLF RD
to permit the construction of 4 single-family homes and
a special use; to allow an R -1 -Residential Planned Unit
Development. The Zoning Board of ,.Appeals recommended
granting the rezoning requested in ZBA 51-Z-90 and the
special use requested in ZBA 52 -SU -90 by votes of 6-
0.
The Petitioner explained that the plan includes the
construction of 4 single family homes with an access
road off Golf Road, eliminating the need for each home
to have a driveway off Golf Road. This access road,
if private, would be the responsibility of the owners
of the 4 homes through the creation of a homeowners
association, which is why a special use is being
requested. .The Petitionerstated that the access road
would be built to Village standards. .The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended the access road be dedicated as
a public right-of-way which would allow the residents
to have the benefit of services offered by the Village,
such as snow plowing and maintenance.
Village Manager Dixon stated that if the roadway was
dedicated to the Village it would create a hardship as
far as plowing is concerned since thereare no existing
routes close to this location. Following discussion,
it was the opinion of the Village Board that the access
roadway should remain private and not dedicated to the
Village.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and rezone the property being the subject
of ZBA 51-Z-90 from R -X to R-1.
Upon roll calls Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals to grant the Special Use for a residential
Planned Unit Development.
Upon roil call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Ordinances will be presented for first readings at the
August 7th meeting of the Village Board
Page 6 - July 17, 1990
Requests were presented to accept the public and/or
ACCEPT
private improvements for three developments:
IMPROVEMENTS:
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
GREGORY
to accept the public improvements installed in
SUBDIVISION
conjunction with the Gregory Subdivision, Lonnquist
HOSE
Boulevard and We Go Trail.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
PONDS:
accept the improvements relative to certain ponds
KENSINGTON
located within the Kensington Center for Business.
CENTER FOR
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
BUSINESS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
EQUIPMENT
Nays:' None
Motion carried.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
CHICAGO
to accept the improvements installed in conjunction
ASSEMBLY
with the construction of the Chicago Assembly of God
OF GOD
Church located at Golf Road and William Street,
providing the property is subdivided into one lot of
record and necessary utility easements be provided.
Upon roll call: Ayes; Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented bid
BIDS:
results. .
The following bid results were presented for the
FIRE DEPT.
purchase of hose and associated fittings for the
HOSE
Fire Department:
Bidder Amount
Great Lakes $10,062.00*
Mac's Fire & Safety $10,231.75*
Dolton Fire Equipment $10,650.00
Able Fire & Safety Equipment $11,191.75
* These bids did not meet the specifications established.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
DOLTON FIRE
to accept the low qualified bid for Fire Department
EQUIPMENT
hose and fittings as submitted by Dolton Fire
Equipment in an amount not to exceed $10,650.00.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the purchase FIRE DEPT
of work-out clothing:
Bidder Amount
Reuss Sporting $ 74.54
Kale Uniforms $108.25
Cooper $113.50
Page 7 - July 17, 1990
REUSS
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
SPORTING
to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and accept the low bid submitted by
Reuss Sporting for work out clothing for the Fire
Department in an amount not to exceed the individual
clothing allowance established.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
STATION WEAR
The following bids were received for Fire Department
CLOTHING
station wear clothing:
Bidder Amount
Krest $361.70
Kale $374.45
It was noted that the station wear includes several
items of clothing, and the bid submitted by Kale was
lower on the most often ordered items.
KALE
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
UNIFORM
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the bid submitted by Kale Uniform in an
amount not to exceed the individual clothing allowance
established.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FIRE DEPT , Bids were received for the purchase of turn -out gear
TURN OUT GEAR for the Fire Department, however, all bids were higher
than anticipated therefore administration recommends
all bids be rejected and this item will be re -bid.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to reject all bids received for Fire Department turn
out gear.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
LEAF DISPOSAL A request was presented to authorize entering into a
contract for leaf disposal for a total of $19,000.
Mr. Ullich is a farmer in Barrington who has been
accepting the leaves from the Village each year for the
past several years. In order for Mr. Ullich to prepare
the area for composting, he has asked that the Village
pay him in 3 installments, $6,000 on August 1, 1990,
$5,500 on November 1, 1990 and $5,500 on December 1,
1990. It is the recommendation of the administration
that the Village agree to these terms.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of administration and
authorize a contract with Mr. Ullich for leaf disposal
payable in the 3 installments as cited.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 8 - July 17, 1990
Mr. Dixon announced the intention of the Illinois
BRIARWOOD DR
Department of Transportation to install a traffic
& ALGONQUIN
signal at Briarwood Drive and Algonquin Road. Bids
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
will be let in March, 1991.
Mr. Dixon invited members of the Village Board to
PUBLIC SAFETY
a meeting on Thursday morning, 7 AM on July 26 in
BUILDING
the Trustees' Room of the Village Hall for the
MEETING
purpose of reviewing the plans for the proposed
Public Safety Building.
A performance evaluation will be conducted on TCI
TCI
Cable T. V. and a public hearing will be scheduled
for September for this purpose.
Cheryl Pasalic, Cable T. V. Coordinator for the
Village stated that there are areas of Mount Prospect
that have,been unable to.receive local programming
for several months.
ADJOURNMENT ADJOURN
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:56 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 9 - July 17, 1990
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise k"nds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Internal Service Funds
Risk Management Fund
Motor Equipment Pool Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985'
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Fund
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
July 31, 1990
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
7/13/40 through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
7/12/90
7131190
List of Bills
Entry 7/31 90
$ 2,911,592
$1,121,854
$1,001,911
$ 3,031,535
426,615
95,004
3,003
518,616
5,759
67,000
69,084
3,675
8,402
26,311
22,986
11,727
3,370,325
200,204
245,272
3,325,257
228,284
7,307
16,913
218,678
1,261,434
158,368
80,861
1,338,941
5,973
498,000
1,093
502,880
738,641
-
491,991
246,700
140,689
-
-
140,684
769,715
-
36
769,679
3,167
3,532
-
6,694
1,403,476
12,451
41,794
1,374,133
14,679,474
105,138
41,049
14,744,063
16,547,300
115,406
43,150
16,669,556
254 402
-
-
259,402
42.810,798
$2,410,575
$2,059,143
$43,162y230
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
AFFILIATED REALTY
REFUND FINAL BILL
$332.88
REFUND FINAL BILL
$32.1Z
$365.00
AIROOM INC.
BOND REFUND
5100.00
$100.00
ARCHADECK OF LAKE COOK
BONO REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BARTON-ASLHMAN ASSOCIATES* INC
SERVICES RENDERED
$3*745.88
$3!745.88
BAXTER E WOODMAN, INC.
FINAL-SERVICES RENDERED
$29811.56
$2*811.Sr
BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS* INC.
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
5134.62
$134.6
RIIS BORG CONST. CO.
BOND REFUND 1
$70.00
$70.00
,LAMES BRODERICK
RESIDENT R/E TR TAX REBATE
5380.00
$380.00
CHICAGO DRY CLNG L LORY EQ CO
BOND REFUND
$475.00
$475.00
CLASSLINE* INC.
BADGE
$32.30
$32.50*
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PTMT P/R 7/26/90
$224.25
$224.25*
WILLIAM B. COTTON
0040 REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
COURTYARD KENNIC13TT VENTURE
REFUND-SNOW REMOVAL DEPOSIT
5684.00
$684.00
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
PAYROLL PERIO0 ENDING 7/16/90
$473.88
s
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 7/26/90
311441.94
a
$35*126.13
a
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 7/26/90
;377,539.26
1414*581.21*
EDWARD J. DOMAIN
REFUND 6 MO STREET LEASE 84
$160.00
$160.00
FIRST NAT•L BANK OF MT. PROS.
DUE TO FED OEP PAY 7/IZ
511*585.45
DUE TO FFD DEP PAY 7/12
$97.10
s
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/12
$36.25
s
DUE TO FED DEP PAT 7/12
32:717.43
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/12
$973.09
g,
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/26
$11*400.22
�
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/26
3I10.31
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/26
$36.25
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/Z6
$848.41
3
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 7/26
32*687.15
$309491.66*
FLEET MA104TENANCE CONSULT.INC.
FACILITY MICE PLAN
$1,976.20
FACILITY MICE PLAN
$494.05
$2*470.25
GETTYSBURG DEVELOPMENT
BOND REFUND
$9*98I.OD
BOND REFUND
$883.00
SIO*864.00
HOMES BY HEMPHILLT INC.
BOND REFUND
$150.00
BOND REFUND
$1*200.00
BOND REFUND
$19200.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
J.G. ELECTRIC INC.
J -MAC ASSOCIATION
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
LEADS CONSTRUCTION
JAMES H. LEWIS9 JR.
DANIEL M. LYNCH
MILLER# FOREST AND DOWNING LTD
JOE MITCHELL BUICK* INC.
MOUNT PROSPECT PUBLIC LIBRARY
IRIS A. NOTTO
DENNIS M. PANLAK
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
HAROLD J. PREDOVICH
QUALITY POOL SERVICE
KELLY P. REYNOLDS E ASSOCIATES
RICH AND ASSOCIATES* INC.
CAROLINE RICHTER
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
RMRS SYSTEM
ROYAL FUEL LIQUID ENERGIES INC
SCHAUMBURG LUMBER L CONST.
PETER SCELSA
STATE CONST.
STATE Of ILLINOIS
TERRY STONE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
BOND REFUND
$29500.00
BOND REFUND
$1.200.00
BONO REFUND
$29 500.00
$89750.00
SALES TAX 4/1/90-6/30/90
$29382.00
SZ9362.00$
DUP PMT CONTRACTORS LICENSE
$17.50
517.50
BOND REFUND
$475.00
'(475.00
PYNT PIR 7/26/90
(254.00
$254.0'
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
REFUND FINAL BILL
:13.68
REFUND FINAL BILL
$1.32
SIS.00
BOND REFUND
$125.00
$125.00
R/E TRF TAX REFUND
$375.00
$3T5.00*
P-5 BODY REPAIRS
$231.95
$231.95
PPRT-5TH INSTALLMENT
$49263.92
54#263.92*
REFUND
5400.00
$400.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
JULY POLICE PENSION OISB
$4I9048.81
JULY FIRE PENSION OISB
$439149.67
$849198.489
MISC EXPENSES
$20.00
$20.00*
REFUND STICKER
SZ0.00
520.00
DUPL PMT CONTRACTORS LICENSE
$17.50
SIT.50
CODE CHANGE PROCESS
$2094.00
SZ9394.00
FINAL PRT PARKING STUDY
S69I91.41
$69191.4'
REFUND FINAL BILL
$6.06
REFUND FINAL BILL
$.44
56.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$209941.06
SERVICES RENDERED
$209941.06
S41*882.12
POSTAGE METER SOV DEP
$31000.00
$39000.00*
Fl7E'L
$89572.42
189572.42*
BOND REFUND
$75.00
175.00
REFUND FINAL BILL
52.28
REFUND FINAL BILL
5.22
$2.50
BOND REFUND
$475.00
$475.00
LIQUOR APPLIC RECORD CK
$30.00
530,.00#
REFUND FINAL BILL
$20.52
REFUND FINAL BILL
$1.98
$22.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
THOMAS C. TUCKER
BOND REFUND
$75.00
!75.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
TRANSFER TO POLICE PENSION FUND
$413.34
$413.34*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
TRANSFER TO WATER FUND
Sl7*850.00
$17V850.00*
VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE C5623
5100.00
REINSPECTION FEE C6707
$100.00
REINSPECTION FEE C6641
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE C7172
$25.00
REINSPECT ION FEE 07198
125.00
REINSPECTION FEE C7457
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C7483
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE 07552
$25.00
SNOW REM DEP COURTYARD KEMICOTT
$1:316.00
tif691.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT
PROSPECT
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
515061.00
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
$521.28
TRANSFER TO IMRF FUND
$315.43
TRANSFER TO MOTOR POOL FUND
38,500.00
TRANSFER TO RISK MGMT FUND
$400.00
TRANSFER TO MOTOR POOL FUND
$455*000.00
TRANSFER TO TRUST FUND
$125.00
TRANSFER TO IMRF FUND
$1040.00
TRANSFER TO IMRF FUND
5609.06
TRANSFER TO GENERAL FUND
$24x068.45
a
TRANSFER TO MOTOR POOL FUND
$87;500.00
TRANSFER TO 114RF FUND
$26,504.24.
TRANSFER TO RISK MGMT
519.950.00
TRANSFER TO RISK MGMT
31201600.00
TRANSFER TO MOTOR POOL
x15:000.00
INV 93 COURTYARD KENNICOTT
51v316.00
$767:I10.46
VILLAGE OF AT PROSPECT FIRE PE
TR WSFER TO FIRE PENSION FUND
$206.66
5206.66*
WALGREEN CO.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
WEST SIDE TRACTOR
SALES
EQUIPMENT
52,087.00
SZT087000
WOLF POINT REALTY
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$300.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
***TOTAL**
$l*42ts970.Z1
IIII#II*##II***#II#*II*II#3�i#IIIIII#IIII'#*II�R##IID**sR*#*'*###IIS+####9�###II##IIII#*IIIIII i�#iiIIS� IIIIgII'II#l�iFgiY##3#ictII:0�3##�i�*##g9�i#3'
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIYISIGN
EVANS RESTAURANT
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PETTY CASH - FfNAMCE DEPT.
V 6 G PRINTERS INC.
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
OWN(TWN REDEV MTG
HOMETOWN DAYS CONT
ANNUAL BANQUET
MISC EXPENSES
NOTE SHEETS-CORCORAN
S30109.15
$61.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
(2#800.00*
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
APPROVAL REPORT
$46.65
$46.65*
PAYMENT
DATE 7t'31190
***TOTAL**
VENDOR
PURCHASE
DESCRIPTION INVOICE
AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
358Iv59Z.16
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$2#258.41
ILC. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
322#985.67
WATER S SEWER FUND
SZI21376.21
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$16*634.50
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
SZ31.95
CAPITAL IMPAV. L REPO. F
$459*898.58
POLICE PENSION FUND
S419048.81
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
$43#149,.67
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$411794.25
IIII#II*##II***#II#*II*II#3�i#IIIIII#IIII'#*II�R##IID**sR*#*'*###IIS+####9�###II##IIII#*IIIIII i�#iiIIS� IIIIgII'II#l�iFgiY##3#ictII:0�3##�i�*##g9�i#3'
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIYISIGN
EVANS RESTAURANT
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
PETTY CASH - FfNAMCE DEPT.
V 6 G PRINTERS INC.
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
OWN(TWN REDEV MTG
HOMETOWN DAYS CONT
ANNUAL BANQUET
MISC EXPENSES
NOTE SHEETS-CORCORAN
S30109.15
$61.00
$61.00
$2*800.00
(2#800.00*
$168.00
$168.00
$46.65
$46.65*
533.50
$33.50
***TOTAL**
$3#109.15
ADAM'S MARK HOTEL
ADVANCE DEPOSIT -REEKS
$99.00
$94.00*
GLASS* HILL• DALLMEYER C ROTH1
SERVICES RENDERED
$51029.00
S5*024.00
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ENP,PHYSICAL HUFFMAN
$22'5.00
EMP PHYSICAL TIERNEY
5220.00
EMP PHYSICAL. SKURLA
582.00
EMP PHYSICAL BURG
582.00
EMP PHYSICAL PIKE
$62.00
$691.00
ICMA
REGIS -76TH ANNUAL COW
$491.00
$491.00
ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC
DUES-OIXON
$190.00
$190.00
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
ANNUAL BANQUET
$84.00
$84.00
VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PUBLIC WORKS PUBLICATIONS
SILO
SOCIETY FOR HUMAN RESOURCE DEV'
YON BRIESEN AND PURTELL ♦ S.C.
XEROX CORP.
VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SlUPPL IES
MISC EXPENSES
VILEAGE ENGINEER AD
EMPLOYEE RECOGNITION
VIDEO FOR BUSINESS E TRNG
SERVICES RENDERED
MTCE AGREEMENT 1048 COPIER
$110482.08
PAGE 5
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
1465.10
5465.10
$7.95
17.95*
$337.50
5337.50
$449.99
3449.99*
$57.20
$57.20
E30444.07
$3*444.0'
$141.27
3141.21
***TONAL**
$$1.482.08
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
H R HART PHOTO
SUPPLIES
$12.30
$12.30
CAROLYN A. MILLER
PRODUCTION CREW
$10.00
$10.00
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
PRODUCTION CREW
$10.00
110.00
OFFICE SQUARE
SUPPLIES
$79.07
$79.07
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
329.36
MISC EXPENSE'S
$9.65
339.01*
ROBERT TOBA
PRODUCTION CREW
$10.00
$i0.OD
WHITE COLLAR SERVICES
TEMP HELP - CASTINO
SZT6.57
TEMP HELP - CASTINO
$366027
3642.84
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
***TOTAL**
3803.22
GENERAL FUND
$603.22
*a***a*a*aa*aaa***aa�a*aaa**aa***aaa*aaaaa**aaaaaaaaaaaa*a*a*aaaaaa*aaa�aaa*aa a*aa*a**aa as*aaaa**a*acaaas
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
ADAMS E ADAMS RECORDING EXPENSES $200.00 $200.00
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS S SONS ENGRAVING OF PLAQUE (10.65 $10.65
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SUPPLIES $509.55 $509.55
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL $53.62
LEGAL $63.37
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
ACCOUNTEMPS
TEMP HELP-MORTELL
(111.75
TEMP HELP-MORTELL
$193.70
$305.45
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
PAPER
$119.51
$119.51
DECISION DATA SERVICE INC.
PRINTER MTCE AUGUST
$04.00
$84.00
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MAINT FOR DISPLAY STATIONS
$176.46
$176.46
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE
$50.00
550.00
MACRO COMPUTER SYSTEMS
SERVICES RENDERED
$100.00
$100.0(
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$9.79
MISC EXPENSES
$ 3.16
$12.95*
PITNEY BOWES INC.
PHONE POSTAGE
$189.00
$189.00
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
SERVICES RENDERED
68d8.75
$888.75
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$107.60
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$55.91
5183.51
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
LETTERHEAD
$557.28
COMPLAINT FORMS
$494.03
SIV051031
SECRETARY OF STATE
VEH REGISTRATIONS TAPES
$500.00
$SOO.DU*
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO., INC.
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$322.90
#322.90
XEROX CORP.
MONTHLY CHCS 1090 COPIER
$12.00 -
MONTHLY CHGS COPIER 1090 JULY
$1,840.31
MTCE AGREEMENT 1048 COPIER
$141.27
$19969.58
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
'$59933.42
GENERAL FUND
$5:933.42
*a***a*a*aa*aaa***aa�a*aaa**aa***aaa*aaaaa**aaaaaaaaaaaa*a*a*aaaaaa*aaa�aaa*aa a*aa*a**aa as*aaaa**a*acaaas
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
ADAMS E ADAMS RECORDING EXPENSES $200.00 $200.00
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS S SONS ENGRAVING OF PLAQUE (10.65 $10.65
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. SUPPLIES $509.55 $509.55
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL $53.62
LEGAL $63.37
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/'31190
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
LEGAL
$58.50
LEGAL
$56.06
LEGAL
656.06
LEGAL
s82.8T
LEGAL
660.93
$43►.41
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERY
si8.Z0
si8.2r
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT C0.• INC.
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$201.36
sZ01.3,
ZOTH CENTURY PLASTICS
OFFICE SUPPLIES
sZ03.99
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$41.42
(245.41
VILLAGE CLERKS OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$19616.58
GENERAL FUND
$19616.58
RISK MANAGEMENT
BROOKFIELD
ADMIN FEES JULY
$39381.30
EXCESS LOSS PREMIUM JULY
$699Z1.76
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 7/411/40
$169115.85
MED CLAIMS THRU 7123
$319704.32
MED CLAIMS THRU 7/27190
$14.095.65
$729218.88#
HMO ILLINOIS
HLTH INSURANCE AUGUST
$5:553.11
498553.11
HOBBS GROUP* INC.
INSURANCE PREMIUM
$350.00
INSURANCE PREMIUM
6350.00
INSURANCE PREMIUM
$1.150.00
INSURANCE PREMIUM
$940.00
$29790.00
THERESA SPRENGEL
NURSES LIABILITY INSURANCE
$67.00
$67.00
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$809628.99
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $80#628.99
INSPECTION SE"IC£S
B E H INDUSTRIES MAPS E PLATS $213.00
BAXTER E WOOD MANv INC.
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO.
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
MICHAEL FRONTZAK
GRAYBOOKS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
ROBERT J. ROELS
XEROX CORP.
INSPECTION SERV LES
GENERAL FUND
MAPS E PLATS
5174.90
$387.9'
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$119467.00
$tIV467.0u
EQUIPMENT
'$111.63
6111.63
COMPLAINT FORMS
$208.00
$208.00
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$175.00
$175.00
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$125.00
1125.00
MISC EXPENSES
$12.55
s
MISC EXPENSES
55.00
SIP.55#
TRAVEL REIMS
$114.80
$114.80
MTCE AGREEMENT
$36.90
MTCE AGREEMENT
$133.00
MTCE AGREEMENT
SZ9.60
MTCE AGREEMENT 1035 COPIER
5137.00
MAINT AGMT 2510 COPIER
$68.75
$405.25
***TOTAL**
$13#012.13
$I390I2.13
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AETNA TRUCK PARTS PARTS $44.90
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PHONE SERVICE
SII2.25
$111.66
$155.36 $424.17
$326.4+4 $326.44
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
ATET
31200205690
$1.31
3I.31
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
SUPPLIES
$171.94
$171.94
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE*
REPAIRS
$97.50
$97.50
CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
(40.80
240.80
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BM66JT5422A
$8.5T
$8.57
THE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS
P R SUPPLIES
$23.00
SZ3.Of
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANAtYSISv N
SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES
$160.00
PARTS INVENTORY
8243.34'
$403.34
COOK COUNTY SHERIFF POLICE DEP
TUITION - EGELSTON
$950.00
$950.00
RICHARD L. ORAFFONE
EXPENSES ADVANCE
Sis398.50
$1:398.50*
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
SERVICE
'$39.00
SERVICE
$39.00
SERVICE
539.00
WHEEL ALIGNMENTS
$39.00
WHEEL ALIGNMENTS
$39.00
$195.00
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
MICE AGREEMENT
$132.73
MTCE E COPIES
$252.59
$385.32
HEWLETT PACKARD
SUPPLIES
$162.00
x162.00
HYOROTEX• INC.
PARTS
$449.76
3449.76
ILLINOIS SELL TELEPHONE CO.
061 9 15 G
$37.83
BZ8 9 15 G
$30.63
750915G
5136.08
$204.54
ILLINOIS BELL
TELEP"ON E EXPENSE
$100.00
5100.0'
ILLINOIS CRIME PREVENTION ASSN
ROSCOP, DAHLBERG
$50.00
$50.OU
LATTOF CHEVROLETS INC.
SUPPLIES
$838.81
$838.81
LIBRA SAFETY PRODUCTS
SUPPLIES
$47.35
$47.35
LION PHOTO SUPPLY IMC.
FILM SUPPLIES
$85.10
$85.10
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS E OFFIC
SUPPLIES
$23.68
SUPPLIES
$25.00
SUPPE IEIS
$25.00
SUITE I ES
$25.00
SUPPLIES
$2I.96
SUPPLIES
$19.04
SUPPLIES
$85.30
8224498
MCGRUFF'S DRUG PREVENTION
P.R. SUPPLIES
156.18
$56.16
MINUTEMAN PRESS
PRINTING
$51.00
$51.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31190
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
JOE MITCHELL BUICK* INC.
CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.00
MOTOROLA• INC.
SERVICE AGREEMENT
$7v138.32
$7*138.32
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
AUTO SUPPLIES ,TUNE 90
$207.64
$207.64
NAPA AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$119.00
PARTS
$96.80
$215.80
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
CREDIT PARTS
$7.07-
PARTS
$7.07
S.0'
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
TUITION
$110.00
$110.0
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
4117.70
$117:70
NOTARIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLIND
ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
$13.00
ORGANIZATIONAL MEMBERSHIPS
$13.00
326.00
PC MAGAZINE
SUSSLRIPTION RENEWAL
$34.97
$34.97
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
RISC EXPENSES
S7:78
MISC EXPENSES
329.60
MISC EXPENSES
$4.50
MISC EXPENSES
54.25
s
MISC EXPENSES
$10.00
MISC EXPENSES
$37.70
MISC EXPENSES
$12.60
$106.43*
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
STRAYS
$874.00
$874.00
QUALEX* INC.
FILM PROCESSING
SZ4.79
FILM PROCESSING
$20.56
FILM PROCESStNG
$I5.34
FILM PROCESSING
$3.82
FILM PROCESSING
$6.26
$70.77
QUICK PRINT PLUS* INC.
BROCHURES
$457.75
PRINTING
3181.70
5639.45
SAYE-A-PET
STRAYS
$455.00
$455.00
SOUTHERN POLICE INSTITUTE
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICERS COURSE
$980.00
1980.00
SCOTT SUttIVANT
NEMEG DRUG SCHOOL
$30.00
530.00
TCI OF ILLINOIS
CABLE BILL-POLICE DEPT
$2.75
$2.75
WIPECO INC
SUPPLIES
5159.00
$159.00
3M PWG0789 WO
SUPPLIES
5195.64
$195.64
PNCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
x18*159.08
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $189159.08
FIRE & EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
ADVANCED ELECTRONIX
ANSUL FIRE PROTECTION
AT&T
TIMOTHY BARRON
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
BRENT BAUER
BIOSAFETY SYSTEMS, INC.
BOWEN HARDWARE CO
BUC OM
BUSSE HARDWARE
EOWARD CAVELLO
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CITY OF DES PLAINES
W. S. DARLEY COMPANY
SAM DIX - F.D.
FACTORY M3TUAL ENG. CORP.
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
FRAME EXPRESSIONS
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
GREATER LOS ANGELES CHAPTER
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
JOHN HANSON
EQUIPMENT
$489.00
EQUIPMENT
5899.00
EQUIPMENT
545.00
S1#433.00
PARTS
'6447.80
5447.80
SERVICE
5.65
SERVICE
S.25
S.90
MONROE FIRE SCHOOL
5101.75
$101.75
PARE
$19.95
119.95
MONROE FIRE SCHOOL
5159.15
$159.15
MEDICAL SUPPLIES
(65.12
$65.12
EQUIPMENT
/79.96
SUPPLIES
$4.74
584.70
REPAIRS
521.00
$21.00
SUPPLIES
$63.51
$83.51
CONF REGISTRATION &' EXPENSES
$765.00
.$765.00
SERVICE
$28.96
SERVICE
SZ5.84
SERVICE
$35.20
SERVICE
35.36 -
SERVICE
$3.36-
$81.28
HAI MAT CALL 5/7/90
$979.54
5979.54
EQUIPMENT
$35.10
$35.10
MONROE FIRE SCHOOL
'$159.15
5159.15
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$495.00
$495.00
SUPPLIES
555.00
$55.00
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$344.60
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$146.85
$491.45
REPAIR PARTS
546.79
$46.79
PERFORMANCE REVIEWS VIDEOS
$251.00
$251.00
MTCE AGREEMENT
$132.73
$132.73
MONROE FIRE SCHOOL
5101.75
$101.75
FIRE E EMERGENCY PR10TECTI(I DEPT.
IGE9 INCORPORATED
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CD.
INTERCITY EMS SUPPLIES
CLARENCE LEHMANN
J.C. LICHT COMPANY'
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS E OFFIC
MEDICAL PRODUCTS
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS9 INC.
MOTOROLA• INC.
NAPA -HEIGHTS AUTOMOTIVE SUPPLY
BASIL NIKIFORAK
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
NOVAK E PARKER INC.
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SOCIETY OF FIRE PROTECTION
RALPH L. STADLER# JR.
SUBURBAN GAS SALES
KEVIN TREU
RICHARD WELLS
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CYL OXYGEN RENTAL
$18.00
$18.00
424 9 15 G
$192.14
113 9 15 G
575.08
061 9 15 G
$37.82
575 9 15 G
$412,28
244915G
$25.73
244915G
520.23
$763.2'
MEDICAL EQUIPMENT
5436.00
FINAL -SUPPLIES
$64.95
$500.95
FIRE SCHOOL
$101.75
SI01.75
FURNITURE E EQUIPMENT
$140.40
$140.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES
545.49
$45.49
EQUIPMENT
$3#401.11
$39401.11
TONER
$103.81
$103.81
SERVICE AGREEMENT
$29493.12
SP9493.12
PART
58.34
$8.34
MONROE FIRE SCHOOL
$101.75
$101.75
SUPPLIES
$29.07
SUPPLIES
349.00
SUPPLIES
$42.02
$120.09
EQUIPMEuT
.$729.95
5729.95
MACH SVC
$65.00
$65.00
AEMIBER'SHIP DUES
SLIO-00
$110.00
MONROE FIRE SCHOOL
$101.75
SI01.7
OXYGEN CYLINDERS
382.00
$82.00
FIRE SCHOOL
$101.75
$101.75
MONROE FIRE SCHOOL
5101.75
5101.75
***TOTAL** $159100.96
$149067.I4 CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND $1*033.82
VENDOR
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
GENERAL FUND
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACC`DUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SERVICES RENDERED -AUGUST
$28#299.00
PAGE 13
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$28#299.00 $28*299.00
***TOTAL** $28#299.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
3399365
$45.36
$40.36
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
528.25
$28.25
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
Mi SC EXPENSES
$26.55
MISC EXPENSES
$71.70
(98.25*
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
- /171.86
GENERAL FUND
$171.86
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
PUBLICATION
$24.90
124.90
ANALYTICAL LAB. FOR ENVIR.EXC.
ASBESTOS RMVt - SIC
$2#320.00
ASBESTOS RMVL - S1C
$260.00
ASBESTOS RMVL - S/C
$425.00
$31F005.00
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
BOXWOOD STREET IMPROVEMENTS
$55061.29
$55#361.29
CAMIROS
SERVICES RENDERED
$1v715.70
$I#715.70
ARMOND D. KING# INC.
ECONOMIC DEV SERVICE
$29750.00
$2#750.00
MIDWEST CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SERVICES RENDERED
$2#293.48
SERVICES RENOERED
$2#961.12
'$5#254.60
V'E ND OR
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
REI TITLE SERVICES
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
TOMER CLEANERS
V E G PRINTERS INC.
WALLFILL INSULATION* INC.
XEROX CORP*
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABEE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SUPPLIES
$64.65
164.65
MISC EXPENSES
110.15
510.15*
REPORT FURNISHED
$75.00
675.00
SERVICES RENDERED
526500.00
$21500000
50% REBATE -FACADE PROGRAM
$335.44
1335.44
BUSINESS CARDS -FARNHAM
$48.00
x375.72
NOTE SHEETS -FARNHAM
533.50
581.5/
COBG-15 N KENILWORTH
$294.50'
5294.5L
MTCE AGREEMENT 1048 COPIER
3141.28
$I41.28
RESURFACING PROGRAM
***TOTAL**
5716614.Oi
$46788.18 COMMUNITY
DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$666825.83
agaaaaaaa:aa� aaaaa aaa:aa a�ss�aaaar�as�aaraaa*aaaaa*aaaaaaaa�aaa+e�aaasass�s�aaasaa�as as�aaaaaagaaaaaaaaa�aasaaa*�*
STREET DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING COMPANY
AM -LIN PRODUCTS: INC.
AMERICAN FORESTRY ASSOCIATION
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
638.76
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
379.03
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
$29.75
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
1132.43
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
$24.22
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
171.53
x375.72
PARTS
123.89
PARTS
$163.67
$187.56
PAVING MATERIALS -JUNE 90
$1*341.59
RESURFACING PROGRAM
536003.40
$49344.99
PARTS
$14.93
SUPPLIES
1106.06
CLNG SUPPLIES
5278.83
$409.82
MISC EQUIPMENT
$25.00
SZ5.00
LOCK E KEYS
$47.50
$41.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
ARLINGTON POWER EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
5365.00
1385.00
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
MATERIAL
540.00
MATERIAL
540.00
MATERIAL
5195.00
$275.00
ARTLEY PAVING E CONTRACTING
REPAIRS
$289405.00
$28*405.00
BILL'S LAWN E POWER
PARTS
$22.90
PARTS
#47.90
$70.86
BLS ENTERPRISES. INC.
REPAIRS
$628.00
$628.00
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
SUPPLIES
'$208.73
SUPPLIES
$103.20
SUPPLIES
5223.38
SUPPLIES
$60.82
SUPPLIES
$60.83
SUPPLIES
$60.82
$717.78
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
PARTS
(38.02
$38.02
CAGE INDUSTRIES
CLEANING SUPPLIES
SZ54.05
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$254.05
CLEANING SUPPLIES
1254.05
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$254.05
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$254.05
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$254.05
CLNG SUPPLIES
$335.50
$1r859.80
CENTURY RAIN AID
Sf1PPLIEs
$90.90
SUPPLIES
$23.16
$114.06
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
'$328.22
SUPPLIES
$11.70
$339.92
CHICAGO TURF 6 IRRIGATION
PARTS
$16.02
PARTS
$299.95
PARTS
$79.38
PARTS
384.10
PARTS
632.42
$511.87
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
USAGE 6$20-TtZO/90
$41.18
$81.18
ARTHUR CLESEN♦ INC.
SUPPLIES
$28.30
SUPPLIES
$63.80
$92.10
GLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM SERVECE
$T6.89
UNIFORM SERVICE
$17.81
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7131190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
UNIFORM SERVICE
576.90
UNIFORM SERVICE
$19.25
UNIFORM SERVICE
$76.89
UNIFORM SERVICE
$22.74
$290.48
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
JANITORIAL SERVICE
SIV836000
JANITORIAL SERVICE
$64.00
$19900.00
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BF80-JT-17006
$130.72
$130.7
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANAL'TSIS*IN
SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES
5160.00
PARTS INVENTORY
3243.33
$403.33
CUMMINS NORTHERN ILLINOIS# INC
PARTS
$12.05
$12.05
DOOR SYSTEMS* INC.
PARTS
#100.00
$100.00
EAR HIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
REPAIRS
$30.00
REPAIRS
560.00
REPAIRS
$37.23
$I27.23
EXECTECH MICROSYSTEMS
VEH MTCE SUPPLIES
$19.25
$19.25
FINISHMASTER# INC.
SUPPLIES
$16.30
SUPPLIES
$131.74
SUPPLIES
63.52
SUPPLIES
$17.50
$169.06
FOREST TREE SERVICE* INC.
TREE REMOVAL SERVICE
$3#338,73
$39338.73
FORESTRY SUPPLIERS INC.
MISC EQUIPMENT
$57.16
$57.16
GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO.
SERVICES RENDERED
$83.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$83.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$83.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$83.50
SERVICES RENDERED
$83.50
$417.50
THE GLIDDEN COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$10.04
SUPPLIES
$73.55
$83.59
HENRICKSEN
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$672.00
$672.00
HYDROTEX# INC.
PARTS
$449.76
3449.76
ILLINOIS IRRIGATION SUPPLY INC
SUPPLIES
$302.59
$302.59
INGRAM ENTERPRISES• INC.
TURF MOVING
$700.00
TURF MOWING
3700.00
TURF MOWING
$700.00
$2#100.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET* INC.
SUPPLIES
$560.64
RENTAL CWGS
$891.60
$I#452.24
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
LENNY HOFFMAN EXCAVATING* INC.
SCHOENMCK RD RECONSTRUCTION
$72x742.50
$721742.50
LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO.
PARTS
5470.67
6470.67
METER MATERIAL CO.
LIMESTONE SCREENINGS
$895.60
MATERIALS
'$321.31
MATERIALS
$240.00
$1x456.91
MIGHTY MITES AWARDS G SONS
PLAQUE
$24.00
S24.Or
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS: INC.
SUPPLIES
334.00
s34.0L
JOE MITCHELL BUICK* INC.
BODY REPAIRS -M70145
$677.50
1677.50
MOUNT PROSPECT LAWNMOWER
PARTS
'S14.00
$14.00
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
AUTO SUPPLIES ,LUNE 90
$62.54
AUTO SUPPLIES .TUNE 90
$37.93
$100.47
DAVID MURRAY
SIDEWALK REPL PROGRAM
S82.00
582.00
NAPA AUTO PARTS
PARTS
$78.98
PARTS
$242.51 -
PARTS
5242.51
PARTS
$13.88
$92.86
NEENAH FOUNDRY CO.
DETENTION/RETENTION RPRS
$75.00
PARTS
$232.00
$307.00
NELSON-HARKINS INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
5146.15
$146.15
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
11 S PINE ST
$85.34
1830 KENSINGTON
4i80.T2
$266.06
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$552.33
SUPPLIES
51.95
SUPPLIES
$110.05
SUPPLIES
$37.60
SUPPLIES
(63.52
SUPPLIES
$36.60
SUPPLIES
3.75
5802.80
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
PARTS
$210.76
PARTS
SI.li
CREDIT PARTS
Sl.i1-
PARTS
$129.71
CREDIT PARTS
S6.33 -
PARTS
$7.07
$241.21
NORTRWIEST STATIONERS INC.
SUPPLIES
$372.32
SUPPLIES
$89.60
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
TONY PATRASSO
PETTY CASH - PUB$ IC WORKS
RAY E SONS* INC.
REDI-STRIP COMPANY
ROSEMONT BUILDING E SUPPLY CO.
ROWILAND-S EQUIPMENT• INC.
C. SAN GALLI
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
SHEPP PEST CONTROL
SOUTH SIDE CONTROL COMPANY
STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC.
STANDARD TANK INSTALL.00.9INC.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7%31190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SUPPLIES
REIMS -SAFETY SHOES
EXPENSES E TRAVEL
EXPENSES E TRAVEL
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL 6 SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
MAINT S SUPPLIES
VEH SUPPLIES
VEH SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PARTS
S/W REPLAC SHARE COST
PARTS
JULY PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
JULY PEST CONTROL
HVAC REPAIRS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
RETURN SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REPAIRS
INVOICE AMOUNT
5141.60
$50.00
$41.13
$7.91
$21.31
$31.60
$30.91
$23.33
$12.20
$2.13
$4.20
$3.78
S.97
$4.73
527.00
$47.91
$29341.00
$51:30 00
519296.00
$ 304.00
s95.00
$545.50
361.50
$63.88
$40.00
640.00
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$40.00
$108.89
$ 37.00
$5.04
S31.23-
$54.69
$111.05
PAGE 18
TOTAL
$603.52
$50.00
s
g
s
$259.33$
$29341.00
$19809.00
3399.00
5545.50
361.50
$63.8
$240.00
$108.89
t
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
TCI OF ILLINOIS
TECH SYN CORPORATION
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DEVICES
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
TOM ULICK
VANITIES INC.
PITO F. VIRGILIO
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
WESTERN ENGINE COMPANY
WIPECO INC
ZIESELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
CABLE HILL -P W
PARTS
VEH MAINT SUPPLIES
ELECTRICAL SUPPLIES -JUNE
LST PYMT - LEAF DISPOSAL
SUPPLIES
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
PIPE
6146,002'.78 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
PAGE 19
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
312.06
$12.06
$14.24
$14.24
6169.10
5169.10
57.25
57.25
Sa,000.00
$8,000,Do*
s500.00
#500.0('
582.00
582.01
$1x946.00
51#946.00
s462.59
PARTS
$90.75
$553.34
$76.30
$76.30
6236.00
$236.00
62#359.00
62059.00
***TOTAL** 5149*006.18
$3,003.40
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
RISC BLDG SUPPLIES
$43.07
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
$89.86
141SC BLDG SUPPLIES
$49.50
MISC BLDG SUPPLIES
515.57
SL98.00
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
StS.56
PARTS
$111.65
PARTS
$14.60
$141.83
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC
TRAINING MATERIALS
6125.00
$125.00#
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
PARTS
$42.30
$42.30
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
FILM PROCESSING
$77.88
$77.88
ARLINGTON POWER EQUIPMENT
EQUIPMENT
s227.00
$227.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PA YAENT DATE 7/31190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
SERVICES RENDERED
$261.80
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
SERVICE
$102.60
bAOGER METER INC
METERS
$39116.40
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
SUPPLIES
1271.99
SUPPLIES
;86.14
THE BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
PARTS
$145.10
PARTS
$18.68
PARTS
$11.06
CADE INDUSTRIES
CLNG SUPPLIES
$255.00
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM SERVICE
$76.90
UNIFORM SERVICE
$17.80
UNIFURM SERVICE
$76.89
UNIFORM SERVICE
$19.26
UNIFORM SERVICE
$76.90
UNIFORM SERVICE
$22.73
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BJSO-J'T-23598
$31615.94
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
BH673TI310A
$138.67
COMPUTERIZED FLEET ANACYSISIIN
SOFTWARE SUPPORT SERVICES
$160.00
PARTS INVENTORY
$243.33
COMPUTERLAND
SUPPLIES
$69.50
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR S€RVICE IN
REPAIRS
$37.23
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
PRIORITY LETTER
$15.50
THE FILM LIBRARY
SAFETY FILM
381.00
FINISHMASTERI INC.
SUPPLIES
$16.30
SUPPLIES
$131.74
SUPPLIES
$17.50
JOSEPH D. FOREMAN E CO.
EQUTPMENT
$31425.00
FREDRIKSEN L SONS
SERVICE
$20.00
SERVICE
$20.00
GE SUPPLY
REPAIR MAINT MATERIAL
$156.16
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
$489.18
WATER METER MATERIAL
$69.40
WATER METER EXCHANGES
1721.98
WATER METER EXCHANGES
$309.42
WATER METER LABOR
3133.41
WAFER METER MATERIAE
$26.91
PAGE 20
TOTAL
$261_80
$102.60
$31116.40
1358.13
$174.84,
$255.00
$290.48
$3.615.94
$138.67
$403.33
$69.50
237.23
$15.50
$81.00
$165.54
$31925.00
s40.00
$156.16
Y"ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE Z1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7131190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER METER
EXCHANGES
5206.28
WATER METER
EXCHANGES
$343.80
WATER METER
EXCHANGES
$171.90
WATER METER
EXCHANGES
$412.56
NATER METER
EXCHANGES
$378.18
MATER METER
LABOR
588.94
WATER METER
MATERIAL
$50.10
MATER METER
EXCHANGES
5825.12
NATER METER
EXCHANGES
$8Z5.12
MATEk METER
EXCHANGES
$275.04
$5s3Z7.34
HYDROT£X* INC.
PARTS
S449.7b
$449.76
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MTCE AGREEMENT
3154.24
MTCE AGREEMENT
$100.43
5254.67
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
455 9 15 G
3203.83
068 9 15 G
5533.12
660 9 15 B
$36.51
774 9 15 6
$30.63
013 9 15 G
$30.63
210 9 15 G
$61.25
424915B
$30.20
044 9 82 G
S97.3Z
153915G
$17.7E
ST5915G
$16.80
30393GS
SZ -4.65
575915G
$18.32
338915G
516.91
155915G
$17.46
SI#135.39
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE
590.00
190.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
JUNE REFUSE
DISPOSAL
$1*328.00
S1*328.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET* INC.
SUPPLIES
$691.33
RENTAL CHGS
527245.00
S2*936.33
MID -WEST METER CO.r INC.
SUPPLIES
$337.03
$337.03
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS: INC.
SUPPLIES
5225.50
5225.50
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
REPAIRS
530.00
$30.00
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
JUNE 90 SERVICE
$53.16
$53.16
MOTOROLA• INC.
REPAIRS
$84.00
$84.00
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
NET MIDWEST* INC.
NOkTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PATTEN ENERGY SYSTEMS
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PORTABLE TOOL SALES
POSTMASTER
RAINBOW i HR PHOTO EXP.
SOUND INCORPORATED
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PARTS
TRAINING MATERIALS
JUNE WATER SAMPLES
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
CREDIT SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
LEGAL NOTICE
LEGAL NOTICE
VEH MAINT SUPPLIES
EXPENSES C TRAVEL
EXPENSES L TRAVEL
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL & SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL S SUPPLIES
TRAVEL b SUPPLIES
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
REPAIR MATERIALS
POSTAGE FOR WKTER BILLS
POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS
FILM PROCESSING
FILM PROCESSING
FILM PROCESSING
FILM PROCESSING
SECURITY ALARM SERVICE
INVOICE AMOUNT
15.29
5163.72
S6 5.00
$52.38
$138.70-
$100.72
578.47
$84.99
1241.00
$395.60
$292.29
$47.52
$65.60
$19.6/5
$20.00
120.00
$73.49
$70.59
S7.su
$64. 87
112.00
534.05
$95069
S36-00
$5.85
5370.77
150.46
$16.50
$79.30
$447.71
$78.03
118.58
$10.49
$7.19
$7.19
$75.00
PAGE 22
TOTAL
35.29
$16.72
$65.00
152.38
;762.08
$339.81
$85.25
$40.00
$73.49
$326.55*
$437.73
179.30
S525.74s
143.45
$75.00
VENDOR
MATER AND SEWER DIVISION
STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC.
TRANSPORTATION SAFETY DEVICES
V E G PRINTERS INC.
DAVE WAGNER
WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES
WIPECO INC
IIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEVER DIVISION
MATER 6 SEgER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/x31190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
PARTS
VEH MAINT SUPPLIES
SERVICE REQUEST FORMS
MATERIALS
PRINTING
FIRE HYDRANTS PAINTED
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
PARTS
SUPPLIES
SUPPLIES
REPAIR MATERIALS
$32#896.24
PAGE 23
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
$26.05
$26.05
$169.09
5169.09
$4Z5.00
$353.54
$922.00
$83.50
$188000
$1#535.00
$120.00
$120.0'
$184.99
$347.02
$4.08
S296.60
$127.40
52.08
556.83
51#019.00
$236.00
$1$9.00
$395.00
$287.00
f28T.00
***TOTAL**
$32#896.24
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS JANITORIAL SERVICE 5140.00 $140.00
COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66J'T0496A $21.47
GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
RICH AND ASSOCIATES# INC.
BM66JT3710A
SH661?5262A
BH66J T 52 66C
BH68-JT- 7498- A
SERVICES RENDERED
EXPENSES E TRAVEL
FINAL PMT PARKING STUDY
$8.57
$155.82
$146.21
$21.47
$353.54
583.50
$83.50
$23.11
523.11
$328.66-
$328.66
VENDOR
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7131/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
WATER E SEWER
$278.99
PAGE 24
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$7.50 $7.50
***TOTAL** S27&"
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES JUNE COLLECTION S136v71b.16
JUNE COLLECTION SIZV958075 #
JUNE COLLECTION $89537.21
JUNE COLLECTION $49553.08 $1629765.20#
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL* INC CAR RENTAL $73.35 $73.35
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $15.10 $15.10*
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** $1629853.65
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPR0VEMENTS
S16Z*853.65
CONCARE INC.
REPAIRS
$19895.00
$19895.00
EMERGE A STAR
EQUIPMENT
$18*937.00
#
EQUIPMENT
$89363.70
$279300.70*
MID AMERICA POWER DRIVES
PARTS
5694.13
$694.13
STATE FIRE MARSHAL
UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK FEE
3100.00
$100.00#
SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CU.• INC.
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
SI9863.00
$19863.00
ZIEBART
TRUCK EQUIPMENT
5399.00
5399.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 25
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7/31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** S32*251.83
GENERAL FUND $100000 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND SIs093.13
CAPITAL IMPRV- E REPL. FUND $311058.70
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
E.I.T.1 INC.
FOLGERS FLAG E DECORATING, INC
GENERAL WINDOW CLEANING CO.
HEARTH E HOME INC.
HELLER LUMBER CO.
MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCT
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE EXPLORER
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WURKS
PRINT SHACK
RENT -A -TENT
UNIFIED BEVERAGE
V E G PRINTERS INC.
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
SG2101638A
$53.63
BH67JT3858B
$9.03
$62.66
MISC JULY 4TH DECORATIONS
$75.75
$75.75
BANNER INSTALLATION
1142.00
FLAG
S3I8.27
$460.27
SERVICES RENDERED
$171.00
$171.00
SUPPLIES
$212.00
5222.00
SUPPLIES
$24.60
SUPPLIES
$108.59
SUPPLIES
$12.30
$145.49
ZCD BUDGET ALLOCATION
$2:875.00
$21875.00
EXPLORER CARNIVAL DETAIL
$I:038.00
$$1038.0
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$24.00
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$11.92
#
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$9.75
#
TRAVEL 6 SUPPLIES
$42.00
$87.67#
CONSTIT BICENTENNIAL
115.00
$15.00
JULY 4TH SUPPLIES
$60.00
$60.00
SUPPLIES
544.40
$44.40
SIGN MATERIAL
$250.00
$250.00
BARRICADE RENTAL
$769.60
$769.60
***TOTAL**
$61276.84
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 26
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 7!31/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $69276.84
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
GENERAL FUND
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
BANK C fib S 136.00
FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL 08/'I/90 $29934.58
FLOOD LOAN INTEREST D8/1/90 $709.15
***TOTAL**
$39643.73 CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E 1 1974
536.00*
$ 3* 643.7
$3s679.73
$36.00
$2+9059914+4.15
DATE RUN 7/31!"40 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 27
TIME RUN 12.02.20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID-APPBAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 7!'31/90
NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT
1 GENERAL FUND SIT001*91i.00
ZZ MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND $31003.40
23 COMMUNITY DEVLP MT BLOCK GRANT 389.084.24
24 ILC. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 3227985.87
41 WATER € SEWER FUND S245r272.45
46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 51899L3.49
48 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND $lvO93.13
49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND S80v860.94
51 CAPITAL IMPRV. € REPL. FUND 5491091.10
61 CORPORATE PURPOSES B € 11974 $36.00
71 POLICE PENSION FUND 541x048.81
72 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $43#149.67
74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND S419794.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $290591144.15
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF REFORMING THE
HIGHWAY BEAUTIFICATION ACT
WHEREAS, the Highway Beautification Act of 1965 was intended to
protect the scenic beauty of America's cities and countryside; and
WHEREAS, the Highway Beautification Act has not worked as it was
originally intended causing the proliferation of thousands of
billboards in rural, scenic and historic areas; and
WHEREAS, the Highway Beautification Act prohibits local governments
from regulating and removing billboards using their own land use
laws; and
WHEREAS, no federal monies have been appropriated since 1982 to
assist cities in paying for billboard removal; and
WHEREAS, the Highway Beautification Act allows the destruction of
trees on public land to enhance the visibility of billboards.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby urge Congress to enact legislation that
would:
1. Halt the construction of additional billboards on federal
highways;
2. Restore the authority of local governments to remove non-
conforming billboards using their own local land use laws;
3. Further the removal of billboards in inappropriate locations,
especially in rural, scenic, historic and residential area;
and
4. End the practice of allowing billboard companies to cut down
trees on public land in front of billboards.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
A,
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TBE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
increasing the number of Class "R" liquor licenses by one (1) (Dragon City, 1716
Brentwood Square), so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter
13 shall be and read as follows:
Section 13.107, nmber of licenses:
Three (3)
Class A Licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Ten (10)
Class C licenses
One (1)
Class D License
Two (2)
Class E Licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H License
One (1)
Class M License
Two (2)
Class P Licenses
Sixteen (16)
Class R licenses
Ten (10)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T License
Nine (9)
Class W Licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of
Village President
0
1990.
Class
Establishment
Number
A
McBride's; Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
3
B
Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors; The
Liquor Shoppe; Mt. Prospect Liquors: Osco
Drugs; Phar-Mor; Walgreens, (83 and Golf);
Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
1
M
Holiday Inn
1
P
Arlington Club Beverage; Shimada Shoten
2
R
Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Dragon City, Edwardo's;
Fellini; Giordano's (Rand Road); Giordano's
(Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan;
Izakaya, Sankyu; Little America; Pepe's;
Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise; Torishin;
Yasuke
16
S
Carlisle; El Sombrero; Evans;
Jake's Pizza; Karnpai; Old Orchard-Greenview;
Reunion; Sam's Place; Second Dynasty; Wild
Stallions Cafe
10
T
Thunderbird Lanes
1
W
Mickey's Diner; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's
Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut
(Algonquin Rd); Pizza Hut (Euclid); Rosati's
Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's
9
59
Village of, cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 26, 1990
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS C RETAIL PACKAGE LIQUOR LICENSE
ONE OF THE UNITS AT BRENTWOOD SQUARE SHOPPING
CENTER
There has been a request by Mr. Bradley Holm, who is the President of Kensington
Corporation, which would like to have consideration for a Retail liquor license at the
Brentwood Square Shopping Center.
Mr. Hohn and one other individual, a Kathleen Stein who is a financial investor in the
corporation, were in my office. I fully explained the posture of the Village concerning
liquor sales and the reluctance of the Board to automatically grant Retail Liquor
Licenses. The individuals involved indicated to me that at the present time, they plan
to be part of the United Liquor Stores, as an affiliate. They anticipate having hours
from 10:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. and in addition to the retail package sales, they
anticipate also providing delivery services. They feel that the senior population in town
would support a delivery service.
Mr. Hohn has not had a Liquor License in his name, although he has had over five
years of experience; in particular with wines. He, as well as Ms. Stein, have also worked
in restaurants.
They anticipate taking about one-half of the old Ace Hardware space which is about
5,000 square feet and they would anticipate it would take about two weeks for them to
be prepared in order to move in and stock the establishment.
The granting of this license would then mean that we would have three Liquor Licenses
at the Brentwood Shopping Center, assuming that the Class R license for the Oriental
Restaurant would be granted.
tNJOHN FULTON DI
JFD/rcw
attachment
'A] 114 11
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF TEE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SES; ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
increasing the number of Class "C" liquor licenses by one (1) (United Liquor Mart,
Brentwood Square), so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13
shall be and read as follows:
Section 13,101 Number of Lionses:
Three (3)
Class A licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Eleven (11)
Class C Licenses
One (1)
Class D license
Two (2)
Class E licenses
One (1)
Class G license
One (1)
Class H license
One (1)
Class M License
Two (2)
Class P Licenses
Sixteen (16)
Class R licenses
Ten (10)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T License
Nine (9)
Class W licenses
SECTION TWO, That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of
Village President
1990.
Class
Establishment
Number
A
McBride's; Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
3
B
Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's
(83 & Golf); Gold Eagle Liquors; The
Liquor Shoppe; Mt. Prospect Liquors: Osco
Drugs; Phar-Mor; United Liquor Mart. Walgreens
(83 and Golf); Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza)
11
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
1
M
Holiday Inn
1
P
Arlington Club Beverage; Shimada Shoten
2
R
Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Dragon City; Edwardo's;
Fellini; Giordano's (Rand Road); Giordano's
(Elmhurst Road); House of Szechwan;
Izakaya Sankyu; Little America; Pepe's;
Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise; Torishin;
Yasuke
16
S
Carlisle; El Sombrero; Evans;
Jake's Pizza; Kampai; Old Orchard-Greenview;
Reunion; Sams Place; Second Dynasty; Wild
Stallions Cafe
10
T
Thunderbird Lanes
1
W
Mickey's Diner; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's
Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut
(Algonquin Rd); Pizza Hut (Euclid); Rosati's
Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's
9
60
Village Qfl--Ioumt Prospect
,Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: EVERETTE M. HILL, JR., ESQ.
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 29, 1990
SUBJECT: LIQUOR ORDINANCE
I have discussed with the Mayor items that we need to review concerning the Liquor
Ordinance which would be appropriate to bring up sometime in the near future for a
Committee of the Whole meeting.
The first one is an Amendment to the liquor Control Ordinance to provide for
Appeal to the Circuit Court. Since the Conference has not been successful in getting this
jisra e—pTWss in Springfield, the Mayor feels it is appropriate for us to
review it again.
Secondly, I would also like to suggest that we place in our local Ordinance provisions
for I sioner may determine
that mmission that we have a
pro ntly displaying that it is
CIO ation of the Local Liquor
se
Ord our Local Ordinance as
we
JOHN FULTON DIXON
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospm, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON
SL
FROM: EVERETTE M. HILL, JR., ESQ.
DATE: MAY 17, 1989 Z�Fs
'DMENT OF LIQUOR CONTROL ORDINANCE
SUBJECT: AMEN TO PROV DE
FOR DIRECT APPEAL TO CIRCUIT COURT
( 3
Please find attached a proposed Ordinance amending our Liquor Control Ordinance.
Also attached is an earlier memo describing the problem that the amendment will
address.
As you are aware, we have had no success with the legislators in achieving such a
Statewide amendment. I was told by the Northwest Municipal Conference that it
opposed by the Illinois Retail Liquor Dealers' Association.
It is my opinion that the Village of Mount Prospect has the authority to do this under
its Home Rule powers. The amendments provide as follows:
1. All appeals shall be directly to the Circuit Court, eliminating the State Liquor
Commission from the Appellate process.
2. The licensee will be granted an automatic. stay of any suspension or revocation
by filing a Notice of Intent to Appeal with the Village Clerk within 72 hours of the
Mayor's decision.
3. The Police Department will post the premises which have been suspended or
revoked.
EVERETTE M. HILL, JR.
EMH/rcw
attachment
(LASS, HILL, DALLXEYER &I ROTH, LT-D.
ArrV&-4EYs wr Law
&APLEY K, G"!I9 tlS?G SKOn.IL Duvcsv&XD w cot-rrex
E�rxcrrt Vit, HILL, JA. • NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS (50062 N'uLjAm L. UrrLwonN
5!'z.vve a D-.zcrcrcn
!'1IC H�Ei }j ivutQ
i3�9i 604-AGtO
Cv.+ll Ctxxxxsrx:v., in
• .nMmen �wow�xe ear
June 11, :987
Mayor Carolyn Krause
village of Mount Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Re: State of Illinois Liquor Control Commission
near Mayor Krause;
we have on many occasions discussed the role of the State
of Illinois Liquor Control Commission in reviewin4 decisions of
Local Liquor Control Commissioners. It has beenl our mutual
ooservation that the State Commission shows littler respect for
local control over liquor licenses. we have found that despite
legal constraints to the contrary, the State Commission er ,a
often substitutes its own opinions for the opinion of the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner.
It is my recommendation that we attempt to t4vo legislation
introduced in the General Assembly that would eliminate the
State Liquor Control Commission's review of Local Liquor
Commission decisions. If State Commission review wore
eliminated, the licensee would appeal decisions of the Local
Liquor Control Commissioner directly to the Circuit Court. It
is my opinion that now would a good time to attempt to get such
legislation introduced. In 1996 Governor Thompson had reviewed
the possibility of completely disbanding the Illinois Liquor
Control Commission. My recommendation does not go that far. It
would simply take them out of the review process.
I think this legislation is appropriate for the following
reasons;
I. —Most decisions of municipal officials are not
review .e by a State Commission but rather are t'srviewable under
administrative review directly to the Circuit Court.
2. The State Commission has no sensitivity to local
concerns about matters involving the sale of alcohol.
GLASS, HILL, DALLMEYER & ROTx,LrD.
mayor Carolyn Krause
June 11, 1987
Page 2
3. perhaps the most distasteful aspect of the current
system is that if the State Commission overrules the Local
Commissioner and the Local Commissioner wishes t -o appeal that
overruling order, then the Illinois Attorney Gentral represents
the state Commission in that appeal. Effectively, we are left
with a situation where all of the prestige and resources of the
Attorney General's office (paid for by Illinois taxpayers) is
directed at defending the actions of a liquor licensee who has
already been found guilty by a Local Commissioner. The licensee
gets a free appellate lawyer at taxpayer expense! it is an
absurd and unequitable situation.
I am requesting that we attempt to recruit the Northwest
municipal Conference and the Illinois Municipal League in an
effort to introduce and support such legislation.
If I can be of any help in accomplishing that, please let
me know.
Very truly yours,
ISI Everette M. RL&I, Jr.
sv*rette .4. Bill, Jr.
EMhjr/hm
Village of "..,fount Prospect A0_1.0! %,,An
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 29, 1990
suBjEcr SALE OF PROPERTY AT 443 WEST RAND ROAD
Attached is a memorandum from Attorney Everette Hill indicating the methods that may
be used by the Village for the disposition of the above-mentioned real estate.
While Mr. Hill has recommended in the last paragraph the utilization of the third
method, I strongly believe that the second method is the most ideal since there are at
least two people that we know at this time that are interested in the property. I believe
that utilizing the acceptance of bids and letting people know that there are others that
are interest in the property would bring the best price to the Village for this parcel of
land.
JOHN FULTON DI ON
JFD/rcw
attachment
GLASS, HILL, DALLMEYER & ROTH, LTD.
1-MAKdr-19-AW"!"i ;!
TO: Mr. John Dixon, Village Manager
Village of Mt. Prospect
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr. and
Michael M. Roth
DATE: June 28, 1990
RE: Sale of 443 W. Rand Road
Real Estate
The Village may employ any of three methods for the sale or
disposition of real estate.
1. The first method is found in Section 8.514 of the Village
Code. Under that Section, the Village corporate authorities adopts
an ordinance authorizing the sale of any real estate owned by the
Village. The Board may direct that the sale be conducted by
Village staff, by open or closed bidding; by public or private
auction; or by listing the property with a local licensed real
estate agency.
The ordinance need be passed by only a majority of the
corporate authorities and no notice of hearing is required.
Section 8.514 goes on to provide that the ordinance must contain
at least the following:
"A. The names of the purchaser of the property; if a
land trust, the names and addresses of all beneficiaries
shall be disclosed, and if a corporation, names and
addresses of its officers and directors shall be listed;
B. The legal description of the property;
C. The purchase price of the property;
D. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village that the purchase price to be paid for the
property is fair, reasonable and just;
E. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village that the property is longer necessary,
appropriate or required for municipal use; and
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
EvzHUTTE M. HILL, JM;-
899 SNOXIE BOULEVARD 031 COV-TSEL
SuzA"x B. DALLxzTvk
NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS 60062 BRADLEY M. GLASS -
MICHAEL M. RcyTm -
(708)5®4.8910
PAUL A.TAxzlLLO
FAX (708) 564-3442 �SCCKSIN EAR
1-MAKdr-19-AW"!"i ;!
TO: Mr. John Dixon, Village Manager
Village of Mt. Prospect
FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr. and
Michael M. Roth
DATE: June 28, 1990
RE: Sale of 443 W. Rand Road
Real Estate
The Village may employ any of three methods for the sale or
disposition of real estate.
1. The first method is found in Section 8.514 of the Village
Code. Under that Section, the Village corporate authorities adopts
an ordinance authorizing the sale of any real estate owned by the
Village. The Board may direct that the sale be conducted by
Village staff, by open or closed bidding; by public or private
auction; or by listing the property with a local licensed real
estate agency.
The ordinance need be passed by only a majority of the
corporate authorities and no notice of hearing is required.
Section 8.514 goes on to provide that the ordinance must contain
at least the following:
"A. The names of the purchaser of the property; if a
land trust, the names and addresses of all beneficiaries
shall be disclosed, and if a corporation, names and
addresses of its officers and directors shall be listed;
B. The legal description of the property;
C. The purchase price of the property;
D. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village that the purchase price to be paid for the
property is fair, reasonable and just;
E. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village that the property is longer necessary,
appropriate or required for municipal use; and
GLAss, RILL, DALLMEYER & ROTH, LTD.
Mr. John Dixon
June 28, 1990
Page 2
F. The real estate contract for the purchase of
property."
It is our opinion that this Section contemplates that if the
property is not publicly listed or sold at a public or private
auction, then it must be sold pursuant to bids. While the Village
Code deviates from the methods permitting the sale of real estate
under the Illinois Revised Statutes, it is our opinion that Mount
Prospect, as a home rule municipality is not' bound Ly those
statutes and may follow its own ordinances.
2. The second method that the Village may employ for the
sale of realty is authorized under Illinois Revised Statutes, c.
24, Sections 1176-1, 2 and 3. Under this method, the corporate
authorities, upon finding that certain real estate is no longer
necessary, appropriate, required for the use of, profitable to or
for the best interests of the Village, may authorize the sale of
that real estate by ordinance, after advertising for bids. Before
the corporate authorities may make the sale, notice of the proposal
to sell must be published once a week for three successive weeks,
the first of which must be at least 30 days before the date
provided in the notice for the opening of bids. The bids may be
opened only at the regular meeting of the corporate authorities;
and the corporate authorities may accept the high bid or any other
bid to be determined in the best interests of the Village by a vote
of 3/4ths of the corporate authorities then holding office.
However, the corporate authorities may by majority vote of those
holding office,, reject any and all bids. The ordinance awarding
the bids and directing the sale must specify the location of the
real estate, the use thereof and such conditions with respect to
further use of the real estate, if any, as the corporate
authorities deem necessary and desirable to the public interest.
3. The third method municipalities may employ for the sale
of real estate is authorized under Illinois Revised Statutes, c.
24, Section 76-4.1. This method may be employed if the real estate
is "surplus public real estate". The term "surplus" public real
estate is not defined in the statutes and we find no court
decisions interpreting the term. However, our Webster and oxford
Dictionarys define the term "surplus" as meaning "excess", or "that
left over after what is used". It is our opinion that 443 W. Rand
Road would qualify as surplus real estate because it is no longer
necessary, appropriate, useful, profitable to or for the best
interests of the Village.
GLASS, HILL, DAT.T. EYER&ROTH,LTD.
Mr. John Dixon
June 28, 1990
Page 3
Under Section 11-76-4.1, the corporate authorities authorize
the sale of surplus public real estate by resolution. First, the
Village must determine the value of the real estate by a written
MAI certified appraisal. Then, by a vote of 3/4ths of the
corporate authorities -then holding office the Village may accept
any contract proposal determined by them to be in the best interest
of the Village, so long as the contract proposal is at a price at
least 80% of the appraised value.
The resolution may direct the sale by the Village staff or by
listing with a local licensed real estate agency. The resolution
must be published at the first opportunity following passage in a
newspaper published in the municipality and must also contain
pertinent information concerning the size, use and zoning of the
real estate and the terms of the sale.
Because the Village already has a known buyer at an acceptable
price, we recommend that the third method, authorized under
Illinois Revised Statutes, c. 24, Sec. 11-76-4.1, be employed.
While by using this method the Village will incur the cost of an
appraisal, it will not pay broker's fees and the Village will not
be required to sell pursuant to bids.
17RealEs.Mem
GLASS, HILL, DALLMEYER & ROTH, LTD.
TO: Mr. John Burg
Assistant Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
F -Roll: Everette M. H-4-11, Jr.
DATE: July 13, 1990
RE: The Right of the Village of Mount Prospect
to Sell Lot 4 in Block 3 of Prospect Meadows
A Subdivision
OF ColuxSEL
BRADLEY M. GLASS'
'ADXITTED WISCONSIN ESN.
A question has arisen with respect to the Village's right to
sell Lot 4 in Block 3 of the Prospect Meadows Subdivision which was
donated to the Village of Mount Prospect in 1984 reportedly for
use as a well site. It has now been determined that the Village
no longer needs the property and it is in the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect to dispose of it by sale.
Certain parties have suggested that the property was donated
for the express purpose of using it as a well site and since it was
part of a special service district that there may be legal
impediments to the sale of the site. As I have stated in previous
memos, a municipality has the right to sell property which it has
deemed no longer necessary to the welfare of the community. I find
nothing in either the Mount Prospect Village Code or the Illinois
Municipal Code which prohibits the sale of municipal property
simply because that property was part of a special service district
or was originally granted for a special purpose. Further, I have
examined the deed under which the property was granted to the
Village of Mount Prospect and find no deed restrictions on the sale
of the property. As the Board is aware, there is a possible
restriction on the use of the property. A covenant was created at
the time the subdivision was established which stated as follows:
"All lots in this subdivision shall be known and
described as residential lots."
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
EVERETTE M. HILL, JR.
899 SKOKIE BOULEVARD
SuzAxxB B. DALLmETER
NoIRTHBROOK, ILLINOIS 60062
MICHAEL M. RoTm
(708) 5e4-8910
PAUL A.TANzILLO
FAx (708) 564-3442
M E M 0 R A N D U M
TO: Mr. John Burg
Assistant Village Manager
Village of Mount Prospect
F -Roll: Everette M. H-4-11, Jr.
DATE: July 13, 1990
RE: The Right of the Village of Mount Prospect
to Sell Lot 4 in Block 3 of Prospect Meadows
A Subdivision
OF ColuxSEL
BRADLEY M. GLASS'
'ADXITTED WISCONSIN ESN.
A question has arisen with respect to the Village's right to
sell Lot 4 in Block 3 of the Prospect Meadows Subdivision which was
donated to the Village of Mount Prospect in 1984 reportedly for
use as a well site. It has now been determined that the Village
no longer needs the property and it is in the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect to dispose of it by sale.
Certain parties have suggested that the property was donated
for the express purpose of using it as a well site and since it was
part of a special service district that there may be legal
impediments to the sale of the site. As I have stated in previous
memos, a municipality has the right to sell property which it has
deemed no longer necessary to the welfare of the community. I find
nothing in either the Mount Prospect Village Code or the Illinois
Municipal Code which prohibits the sale of municipal property
simply because that property was part of a special service district
or was originally granted for a special purpose. Further, I have
examined the deed under which the property was granted to the
Village of Mount Prospect and find no deed restrictions on the sale
of the property. As the Board is aware, there is a possible
restriction on the use of the property. A covenant was created at
the time the subdivision was established which stated as follows:
"All lots in this subdivision shall be known and
described as residential lots."
GLASS, HILL, DALLMEYER & ROTH, LTD.
Mr. John Burg
July 13, 1990
Page 2
It is arguable that under this restriction that all of the
lots within this subdivision- are to be used for residential
purposes only. It is important as a public body that we must make
the buyer aware of this particular restrictive covenant. However,
this covenant does not prevent us from selling the property.
Additionally, I have examined Ordinance No. 2912 and
Resolution No. 42-79. The ordinance establishes the area as
Special Service Area Number I for Mount Prospect. There is nothing
in Ordinance 2912 which would prevent the Village of Mount Prospect
from selling the property. Resolution 14o. 42-79 is a resolution
authorizing the purchase by the Village of the Prospect Meadows
Water Company of Illinois. Likewise, nothing in this Resolution
would prevent the Village from selling the fee to Lot 4. The
Purchase Agreement for the utility granted the Village a perpetual
easement over the northerly 15 feet of Lot 4 for water utility
purposes. Unless specifically extinguished by the Village at the
time of the sale of the property that easement would survive the
transfer.
It should also be noted that while other persons have
indicated that the property was given to the Village for public use
as a well site, none of the letters or other documents involved in
this transaction make any mention of use of the property as a well
site.
In summary, it is my opinion that there is no legal impediment
to the sale of Lot 4 in Block 3 of Prospect Meadows Subdivision by
the Village of Mount Prospect.
17Lot4B3.Mem
ALLAN R. COHEN (1923.1909)
JOSEP11 E. COHEN
GINA B. KROL
DAVID E. COHEN
COHEN & KROL.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2 NORTH LASALLE STREET
SUITE 1776
CHICAGO. ILLINOIS 60602
TELEPILONE (312) 361.-0300
FAX (312) 3664669
August 2, 1990
Ms. Carol A. Fields,
Village Clerk
village of Mount Prospect
10o South Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Via Fax (708) 392-6022
Re: 443 Rand Road
Dear Ms. Fields:
LAKE COUNTY OFFICE
20 NCRTH UTICA
WAUKEGAN, P_L�N014 EA3a5
TELEPHONE (7081242-4144
Thank you very much for the title comnittment and proposed
ordinance concerning the above property. I have reviewed the
documents and am concerned that the village could have potential
exposure to damages if a sale occurrs.
The title policy only provides title insurance in the sum of
Five Thousand Dollars ($5,000.00). Any sale of the property would
probably be in excess of Five Thousand dollars ($5,000.00). As
such, the Village could be liable for damages if it is unable to
deliver clear title. I believe this potential exists.
I have reviewed the Cook County Tract Book_ to determine if
the Village holds clear title to the property. The Tract Book
shows a "gap in title". I have attached the results of my search.
As the attachment shows, there is no document establishing that
the Banjamins' and Laings' had title to the property when the
property was placed in the land trust, If they did not have
title, the transfer to the village might be null and void.
Although there is a "gap in title", this might be due to a
recording error rather than an absence of a proper deed. For
example, the deed placing title in the land trust was recorded in
the Tract Book under "Block 471 instead of under "Block 311. Until
clear title can be established, however, I believe that the
Trustees should delay in ruling on the proposed ordinance.
Aua- 2 -SO YHU 12:Z5
Ms. Carol A. Fields
Village of Mount Prospect
August 2, 1990
Page 2
Please forward this information to the appropriate parties.
if you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at work
(312\368-0300) or at"home (708\259-4664.
very truly yours,
David E. Cohen
attachment
T H W 1 2 Z-55
-,
Tract gook: Volume 12A, Prospect Meadows Subdivision, Block 3,
Lot 4
Property Address: 443 Rand Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois
1. Date: December 28, 1956
Grantor: Crown Realty Company
Grantee: Prospect Meadows Water Company of Illinois, an
Illinois corporation.
Doc. #: 17164411 (Book 55974, Page 311)
2. Date:
Grantor:
Grantee:
Doc. #:
3. Date: Unknown
Grantor: Benjamin and Florence Benjamin, Stanley Laing and
Beverly wing
Grantee: First National Bank of Des Plaines Trust
No. 97102895 dated September 10, 1984
Doc. #: 26097947 Note: Recorded in Tract Book under Block
4, not Block 3
4. Date: August 10, 1984
Grantor: First National Bank of Des Plaines Trust No.
97102895 dated September 10, 1984
Grantee: Village of Mount Prospect, an Illinois Municipal
C rporation
Doc. #: 2242900
CAF/
6/27/90
7/2/90
7/17/90
8/1/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN
PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
443 WEST RAND ROA
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
have determined that the property hereinafter is not longer
necessary, appropriate, useful, profitable to, or for the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities find it in the best interests
of the village of Mount Prospect to sell the real estate legally
described as follow:
Lot 4 in Block 3, in Prospect Meadows, a Subdivision of the
West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 42
North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian according
to plat recorded December 9, 1949 as Document 14692921 all in
Cook County, Illinois
said property being commonly known as 443 West Rand Road, Mount
Prospect, Illinois.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That a sale of the property described in SECTION TWO
hereof be and the same is hereby directed to be made under terms
and conditions meeting the approval of the corporate authorities
of the Village of Mount Prospect, in accordance with the statutes
of the State of Illinois.
SECTION TWO: That the Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect be
and is hereby directed to cause a public notice advertising for
bids for such property to be published once each week for three
successive weeks in The Daily Herald, and said notice shall be in
substantially the following form:
SALE OF LAND
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
Notice is hereby given that the Village Manager of the Village
of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, will receive bids
at the Office of the village Manager, 100 South Emerson
Street, until 5:00 P.M. on r 1990, for the
purchase of a parcel of land owned by the Village of Mount
Prospect located at 443 West Rand Road. The Bid Proposals
for the purchase of certain land presently owned by the
Village of Mount Prospect, will be opened and publicly read
at the regular meeting of the Village Board, beginning at 7:30
P.M. on - 1 1990. Any such proposal shall be
in the form of a standard real estate contract form
accompanied by earnest money in cash, certified check, or
cashier's check in the amount of 10% of the offer (bid
proposal).
This particular vacant parcel, commonly known as 443 West Rand
Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois, is zoned R-1 (Single Family
residence), as established in a Restrictive Covenant as
Document No. 14707743, along with utility easements, which
property is legally described as follows:
0
443 East Rand Road
Page 2 of 2
Lot 4 in Block 3, in Prospect Meadows, a Subdivision of the
West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 42
North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian according
to plat recorded December 9, 1949 as Document 14692921 all in
Cook County, Illinois.
Prospective bidders and interested persons may review the
location notes at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street,
Mount Prospect, in the office of the Village Clerk. The
Village of Mount Prospect reserves the right to reject any and
all bids.
By Order of the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect.
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor 11
SECTION THREE: That bids received in response to said
advertisement for bids shall be opened by the corporate authorities
at their regular meeting of the Village Board beginning at 7:30
P.M. on 1 1990 at the Senior Citizen Center, 50
South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect.
SECTION FOUR: That within fifteen (15) days after the bid opening
and the successful bidder has been determined and that bid
accepted, the Village shall return the earnest money, by certified
mail or in person, to the unsuccessful bidders.
SECTION FIVE: That within thirty (30) days after a bid is
accepted, the successful bidder shall tender to the Village the
consideration specified in the bid accepted and upon receipt of
such consideration the President and Clerk of the Village of Mount
Prospect shall thereupon cause the necessary legal documents to be
issued on behalf of the Village of Mount Prospect to the successful
bidder for the subject real estate. The corporate authorities of
the Village of Mount Prospect will furnish a warranty deed with a
good and merchantable title, subject to standard exceptions
including but not limited to easements in favor of the Village of
Mount Prospect.
SECTION SIX: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
KX4
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this --- day of , 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
PLANNING ► ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Po.... M p.
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-47-V-90, STANLEY KWIATEK
LOCATION: 1727 BONITA
DATE: JULY 11, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for variations filed by Mr. Stanley Kwiatek of 1727 Bonita. The application
was filed to increase the permitted 21 foot driveway width to 29 feet, and to permit an 9
foot service walk in a required sideyard. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows a 3 foot
service walk in a sideyard.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 28, 1990. At the
meeting, Mrs. Kwiatek presented testimony in support of the request. Mrs. Kwiatek
explained that they had recently removed an older, non -conforming driveway. They also
removed the service walk in the sideyard. The variations are necessary in order to replace
the driveway and walk in their former locations. The petitioner explained that the wider
driveway provided a parking pad for their personal vehicles. The wider service walk was
requested in order to provide a paved surface against the house, designed to drain
stormwater away from the house, and access to a service door.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request, and it was noted that the
application was filed in order to replace existing paved surfaces. The Zoning Board noted
that no one objected to the request, and from all appearances the older paved areas have
not had any adverse impact on the neighborhood. The Zoning Board found that the wider
service walk in the sideyard is adequately screened by bushes on the neighbors' property.
The Zoning Board also confirmed that all drainage would be towards the street, and not
onto an adjoining property.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that the Village Board approve
a request for a 29 foot driveway and 8 foot service walk at 1727 Bonita.
DMC:hg
414) < mt. Prospoect, Illinois
KONIECRO
arka »t Iltartz;e
INGINEENIN4 Ass ociatt
LAND SUAVEYINQ
"LAT OFSUR VEY
Block 4 in Hatlen Heights Unit #1 a Subdivision in the South half of the NortheE
of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian,
Ing to plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook Cc
LS, on August 17,1955 as Docurwnt #1614665.
m
L* -r 1:3
W
E
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 47-V-90 Hearing Date: June 28, 1990
PETITIONER: Stanley Kwiatek
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1727 Bonita
PUBLICATION DATE: June 12, 1990
REQUEST: Variations from Section
14-3016 to allow a 29,
driveway. Also, from Section
14.1102.D.4 to allow an 81
service walk in the sideyard.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT: Robert Brettrager
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016 to
allow a 29' driveway and also from Section 14.1102.D.4 to
allow an 8' service walk in the side yard.
The petitioner, Angela Kwiatek, presented her case stating
that they are replacing an existing driveway and sidewalk.
Mrs. Kwiatek also stated that they have standing water where
the sidewalk is and this helps prevent it from seeping into
the house.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the petitioner started the work without a permit and to
complete the job they must get approval from the Village.
Mr. Clements also stated that there was no impact on the
neighborhood before they decided to replace the driveway and
sidewalk, so this new paving would have no adverse effect.
Also, a tall hedge on the adjoining property helps screen the
wider service walk.
Chairman Basnik asked if the petitioners neighbors had any
objection to the replacement of the driveway and sidewalk.
Mrs. Kwiatek stated that none of her neighbors objected.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
ZBA-47-V-90
June 28, 1990
Page 2 of 2
petitioner a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a 291
driveway and from Section 14.102.D.4 to allow an 8' sidewalk.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mrs. Brothers seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AM ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN ml—
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA47-V-90, STANLEY KWIATEK
LOCATION. 1727 BONITA
DATE: JUNE 21,19"
REQUE
The applicant is requesting variations from the following:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 29 foot wide driveway. The Zoning Code allows a
maximum of 21 feet for a two -car garage.
2. Section 14.1102.D.4 to allow an 8 foot service walk in a sidey yard rather than a
maximum of 36" as allowed by Code.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Engineering recommends that positive front drainage is maintained and rear downspouts be
changed to comply with the Code. Inspection Services notes that no fill should be placed
in the side yard and new pavement should be at or below the existing grade.
PLANNING AND ZOWNG Comm=
Mr. Kwiatek recently removed an older, non -conforming driveway. He also removed a
service walk in a side yard. This work was started without a building permit, and Mr.
Kwiatek was advised that he needed to obtain variations to replace the walk and driveway
in their former location. The petitioner was able to obtain a permit to install a conforming
driveway, but the Zoning Board of Appeals must approve the extra drive width and service
walk replacement.
From all indications, the driveway and walk had no adverse impact on the neighborhood
before they were removed. The replacement pavement shall not cause any additional
impact. The adjoining property has mature bushes screening the pavement and this helps
buffer the proposed walk
Staff would recommend approval, subject to the service walk being installed with drainage
toward the street.
DMC:hg
CAF/
8/l/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS I727 BONITA
WHEREAS, Stanley Kwiatek (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly
known as 1727 Bonita (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property),
legally described as:
Lot 13 Block 4 in Hatlen Heights Unit #1, a subdivision
in the South half of the Northeast quarter of Section 10,
Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, according to plat thereof registered in the
Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois
on August 17, 1955 as Document No. 1614665
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.1102.D.4 to
permit a service walk eight feet (81) in width, rather than the
permitted 31, and a variation from Section 14.3016 to permit a
twenty-nine foot (291) wide driveway, rather than the permitted
211; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 47-V-90 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
June, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of June, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 47-V-90 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102.D.4 to permit an eight foot (81) wide service
walk and a variation from Section 14.3016 to permit a twenty-nine
foot (291) wide driveway.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
ZBA 47-V-90
Page 2 of 2
shall be null and void.unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
11990.
vILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPtCT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER vf__-
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT. ZBA49-V-90, ZBA-50-SU-90, RONALD REICHL, D.D.S.
LOCATION: 1420 WEST LINCOLN
DATE: JULY 11, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for Your consideration, their recommendation on
an application filed by Ronald Reichl. The application effects the property at 1420 West
Lincoln, and was filed for a Special Use Permit to allow a 3 -car garage, and a variation to
permit a 30 foot wide driveway. The application also included a variation to reduce the 16
foot sideyard to 14.6 feet.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 28, 1990. At the
meeting, Dr. Ronald Reichl presented evidence in support of the request. He explained that
he has purchased the property at 1420 West Lincoln, and plans to demolish the existing
home and construct a new single family residence. Dr. Reichl would like to include a 3 -
car garage and wider driveway with the new house. The garage would be for personal
vehicles, and not for any storage or home occupation. Dr. Reichl stated that due to
concerns expressed by the staff, he would eliminate the requested sideyard variation, and
provide a conforming 16 foot sideyard along the west side of the house.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, and it was noted that 3 -car garages are
becoming fairly typical with construction of larger single family homes. The Zoning Board
stated that with this large 135' X 180' lot, there would be sufficient area to allow the large
home and 3 -car garage, and not have any adverse impact on the area. The Zoning Board
also acknowledged the withdrawal of the sideyard variation.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a 3 -car
garage and 30 foot wide driveway at 1420 West Lincoln.
I/ EN
L,rm f 940atts
�I � ftAt'
4 ,mob sA
135
-ej' peal.,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 49-V-90
Hearing Date: June 28, 1990
50 -SU -90
PETITIONER:
Ronald Reichl, D.D.S.
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1420 W. Lincoln
PUBLICATION DATE:
June 12, 1990
REQUEST:
Special Use permit to allow
a three -car garage.
Variation from Section
14.3016 to allow a 301 wide
driveway. Variation from
Sections 14.1002.B and
14.1004.D to allow a 14.671
side yard setback.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Michaele Skowron
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Chairman Basnik introduced this
case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a Special
Use permit to allow a
three -car garage, and variations
from Section 14.30,16 to
allow a 30' wide driveway and from
Sections 14.1002.8 and
14.1004.D to allow a 14.671 side
yard setback.
The petitioner, Ronald Reichl of 307 S. Lancaster, presented
his case by stating that he recently purchased the property
that is 1351 by 180', that presently has a home which he
would like to replace with the proposed house. Dr. Reichl
continued by stating that the property is located on the
corner of Lincoln Ave. and Rob Rd. which is a very narrow
street and this would make parking difficult causing the need
for the variation for a 301 driveway. Dr. Reichl continued by
stating the variation for the side yards is because of the
height of the building.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this property is zoned R -X which requires increased setbacks,
such as the front yard must be 46' instead of 40'. Mr.
Clements also stated that this lot is not being over -built,
ZBA-49-90
ZBA-50-SU-90
June 28, 1990
Page 2 of 2
and is well under the requirements for lot coverage.
However, he recommended that the length of the house be
reduced to eliminate the sideyard variation. Also, there was
no objection to the three -car garage.
Artis Weissenstein, 1430 W. Lincoln, stated she is concerned
with the grade of the house and the height of the foundation.
Mrs. Weissenstein also stated that her lot is the lowest on
the block and is very concerned with the run-off of the
proposed house.
Catrina Tregoning, 1 Rob Rd., stated that she is very pleased
with the proposal and many of the other neighbors too.
Mr. Cassidy questioned the side yard requirement. Chairman
Basnik asked if the house could be reduced in length to
eliminate the variation. Dr. Reichl stated that he would
reduce the depth of the garage, and this change would allow a
conforming sideyard.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a Special Use Permit for a three -car
garage.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr.Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by'a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a variance from Section 14.3016 to
allow a 301 driveway .
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
4'
vfLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN wt -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT.- ZBAA9.V-90, ZBA-SO-SU-90, RONALD REICHI, D.D.S.
LOCATION: 1420 WEST LINCOLN
DATE: JUNE 21, 1990
REQUES
This application includes the following:
1. A Special Use permit to allow a three -car garage instead of a two -car.
2. Variation from Section 143016 to allow a 30 foot wide driveway.. The
allowed by Code is 21 feet.
3. A variation from Sections 14.10023 and 14.1004.D to allow a 14.67 foot side yard
setback instead of 16 feet required by Code.
39GE STAEE COMMENTS
Inspection Services notes that a sanitary sewer exists along the private road and a 12"
sanitary sewer exists along the north side of Lincoln. Also, there is an 18" field tile across
the back portion of the lot and a storm inlet on the east side of the private road at the rear
property line. This sewer travels east to the Creek. Grading plans shall be submitted and
should include existing grades within 100 feet of the property. Furthermore, the lots on the
private road are served by a common well. There is a 10" Village watermain under the
pavement on Lincoln Street.
PLANNING AND ZOhMJG_CfflRdX=
The petitioner has purchased the property at 1420 West Lincoln, and plans to demolish the
existing home to construct a new, 3,687 square foot house. Dr. Roichl would like to include
a three -car garage and widen the driveway with the new home. As we have seen with many
new, more expensive homes, three -car garages are becoming more of a standard amenity.
Three -car garages are nearby in the Kathcon Subdivision and Courts of Kennicott. Staff has
no objection to the three -car garage and driveway width variation as long as the garage will
be used for personal vehicles.
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
ZBA-49-V-90, ZBA-50-SU-90
Page 2
The request also includes a variation of the required setback on the west property line.
Because this is a larger home, the R -X Zoning District requires increased setbacks. For
example, the 40 foot front yard must be increased to 46 feet. The plan meets the increased
front setback. The 10 foot required sideyard must also be increased to 16 feet because of
the height of the house. The applicant is proposing a 14.67 foot sideyard. It would be
possible to meet the 16 foot setback if the length of the house was reduced 1.33 feet. The
petitioner should fully explain why the required sideyard cannot be met. It should be noted
that there is an adequate separation from the home to the west, but staff believes the home
could be built on this lot without variations.
Lastly, for your information, the Floor Area Ratio for the house is .15, well below the .35
permitted. Also, lot coverage is 26%. These figures demonstrate that the property is not
being over -built.
DMC:hg
CAF/
8/1/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE AND VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1420 WEST LINCOLN STREE
ET
WHEREAS, Ronald L. Reichl (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed an application for a variation and special use from
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 1420 West Lincoln Street
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described
as:
Lot 4 in Block 3 in Iverdale Estates, being a subdivision of
part of the south half of the Southwest Quarter of the
Northwest Quarter of Section 11, Township 41 North, Range 11,
East of the Third Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016 to
allow a thirty foot (301) wide driveway, rather than the permitted
211, and a special use to permit a 3 -car garage; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 49-V-90 and 50 -SU -90 before the Zoning
Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
June, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of June, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and
recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village have given further consideration to the variations requested
and have determined that the same satisfies the standards set forth
in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the Village Code and
the Board of Trustees further find that it would be in the best
interests of the Village to grant the variations as specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of
the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO:. The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from
Section 14.3016 to allow a thirty foot (301) wide driveway and a
special use to permit a 3 -car garage.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation and special use granted
herein all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and
regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject
Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall
be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins
within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
ZBA 49-V-90 & 50 -SU -90
Page 2 of 2
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in
the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
"M4*1V
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
JLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSF.,CT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W-1
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-51-Z-90, ZBA-52-SU-90, MICHAEL NAUERT
LOCATION- 1920 GOLF ROAD
DATE: JULY 11, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application filed by Mr. Michael Nauert, The application effects the property at 1920
West Golf Road, and was filed to rezone the property from an R -X to an R-1 Single Family
District. The application also includes a Special Use Permit to allowa residential Planned
Unit Development (PUD). The purpose of the application was to obtain zoning to allo,4
a four -lot subdivision.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 28, 1990. At the
meeting, Attorney Peter Boland and Engineer Joel Michalik presented evidence and
testimony in support of the request. Mr. Boland explained that an existing single family
home will be demolished, and the 1.4 acre site subdivided to allow 4 single family homes.
Mr. Michalik explained the lot configuration, engineering and trend of development. The
engineer stated that the proposed lots would meet all R-1 lot size requirements, and that
lot sizes are compatible with existing single family homes to the north. Mr. Michalik also
described an access road to the lots from Golf Road. This access road is proposed to be
a private lane. The advantage of this design is that it allows a more controlled turning
movement for the homeowners of the lots, and is considered better than each lot providing
a driveway to Golf Road.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning
Board found that the rezoning would permit a subdivision with lot sizes that are consistent
with the area. Thus, the rezoning would have no adverse effect on adjoining properties.
The Zoning Board determined that the subdivision is an attractive design requiring no
variations, and that this application would be acceptable to adjoining property owners.
Concerning the private lane providing access to these lots, the Zoning Board believed that
this roadway should be a public street, with the Village providing maintenance and snow-
plowing. The Zoning Board believed it would be a burden for the homeowners of these
four lots to provide their own street maintenance.
Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that a rezoning from an R -X to
an R-1 District be approved at 1920 Golf Road, subject to dedication of a public street as
an access road.
DMC:hg
TIF 9885 T/F 996
EX
1 918
4�TIF 838
6'WOOD FENCE T.P. ! WOOD FENCE TP» 6. WH F7SHEI?
0. ESMT �Y• ,,
I1 oil IW I z'"
09
,60 T/ F.1 g� p 97.56 I 97.ip I 97_20 I
SLOG TO BE REMOVED 1 I I
IJA
.,,,� /, �, �".;, I sae � ".•: � �,,.
I ,t ri
.qs;,,,�!" """,�,' rade "'� r»• .,,� � �, ..
F+
25-00)
EX. Ce 96.60
96J?
t4
PP. z 9 .00
OHO r�EX ce95.60
'
90.97
PRWOS
EDS SANITARY SEVEN Ex ce
910.56 y PPr
DRIVE TO BE REMOVED s
w
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 51-Z-90
52 -SU -90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: June 28, 1990
Michael Nauert
1920 West Golf Road
June 12, 1990
A rezoning from R -X to
R-1 single family residential.
A Special Use permit under
Section 14.1101.C, 14.2502.A
and 14.701.A.2.b to allow an
R-1 Planned Unit Development
for four single family homes.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Michaele Skowron
Robert Brettrager
Lois Tall, 810 S. Deborah Lane
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner
is requesting a rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single Family
Residential. A special Use permit under Section 14.1101.C,
14.22502.A and 14.701.A.2.b to allow an R-1 Planned -Unit
Development for four single family homes.
The petitioner, Michael Nauert, represented by his attorney
Edwin P. Bolan, presented his case by introducing his
Engineer, Joel Mikalic. Mr. Mikalic stated that the property
is located on the North side of Golf Rd. near Meier Rd.
and proceeded to explain the storm sewer system stating it
would be tied it to existing main on Golf Rd. There is an
existing well on the property which will be capped off and
the septic tanks removed. Mr. Mikalic continued by stating
that roadway will meet all requirements by I.D.O.T. and Mount
Prospect. Also, all M.S.D. requirements will be met.
Mr. Bolan explained that this is going to be a four lot
sudivision with an access road to and from Golf Rd.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the request for the rezoning is compatible with the zoning to
ZBA-51-Z-90
ZBA-52-SU-90
June 28, 1990
Page 2 of 3
the north along Deborah Lane and Carol Lane. therefore the
rezoning would not have any adverse effect on adjoining
properties. Mr. Clements also stated that the access road is
an excellent design preventing the four lots from having
driveways onto Golf Rd. and providing more of a direct,
controlled turning movement. However, the access road should
be a private road with all maintenance and snow removal by
the residents of the proposed homes. The reason for this is
that this small road is located away from other Village
streets.
Lois Tall, 810 S. Deborah Lane, is interested in the size of
the lots. Mr. Mikalic stated that these lots would be
standard sized lots 60'x 100'.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, and it was
determined that the rezoning would allow a subdivision that
is consistent with lot sizes in the area. Also, the Zoning
Board was pleased that this property could be developed with
new single family homes, and not rezoned for commercial.
However, Zoning Board members believed that the proposed
access road should be a public street, and not a private
road. The Zoning Board felt buyers of these lots should be
entitled to snow -plowing and street maintenance.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioner the request for a rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single
family residential.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mrs Brothers seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Skowron, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a Special Use permit under Sections
14.1101.C, 14.2502.A and 14.701.A.2.b to allow an R-1 Planned
Unit Development for four single family homes.
Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
ZBA-51,-Z-90
ZBA-52-SU-90
June 28, 1990
Page 3 of 3
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy,
Skowron, Basnik
Motion carried by A Vote of 6-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT" PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMM
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W r
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING t )AND, �-Z-ONING
SUBJECT: ZBA•51-Z-90, ZBA-S2-SU-90, MICHAEL NAUERT
LOCATION: 1920 GOLF ROAD
DATE: JUNE 21,1990
REQUE
T
The applicant is requesting the following:
1. A rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single Family Residential
2. A Special Use permit under Sections 14.1101.C, 14.2502A and 14.701.A.2.b to
{�/.allllow� an RRi-(/i++��.(/P)yl{la(/nned Unit Development for four single family homes.
�lA� I UAEE 1P B i NM i
Engineering notes that State permits will be required for access to Golf Road and storm
sewers. Grading plans and a plat of subdivision is required. Two private street lights are
suggested. The existing well should be capped and septic tanks should be removed.
Inspection Services notes that due to existing utilities on Golf Road, installation of sewer
will be difficult. Because of topography, more storm sewers may be required: Watermain
should be looped to the existing main to the west and extended to the east property line.
Fire hydrant locations will be determined by the Fire Prevention Bureau and Public Works.
All Development Code requirements shall be met including street lighting and sidewalks on
Golf Road.
PLANNING AND Z&M& NIS
Mr. Nauert has a contrad to purchase the single family home at 1920 West Golf Road. The
site is 1.4 acres. He is requesting a rezoning from the existing R -X Single Family District
to a R-1 District, to allow a four lot subdivision. Also requested is a Special Use permit for
a Planned Unit Development.
Concerning the rezoning, the proposed R-1 zoning is compatible with the zoning to the
north along Debra Lane and Carol Lane. The existing R -X zoning may diminish the
property value as the parcel cannot be utilized in a Whion consistent with adjoining
subdivisions. The R-1 zoning would allow a four lot subdivision that would meet all
Mount Prospect Zoning and of Appeals Page 2
ZBA-5 I -Z-90, ZBA-52-SU-90
t a Est
adjoining property ownem Also, the rezoning meets the rc:sl�d�en designation on
Comprehensive PLin.
in ludes a S cial Use rmit to allow a residential Plannned U
a Moo#
With a residential Planned Unit Development, the Village can require the formation of a
Homeowner's Association, and the PUD Ordinance can include conditions on maintep
and snow plowing. In this way, buyers of the homes will be more fully aware of the,i
obligations, and not look to the Village for services. This could not be done as re
without the PUD.
DMC.bg
CAF/
8/l/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R -X TO R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY) DISTRICT
AS IT PERTAINS TO 1920 WEST GOLF ROAD
WHEREAS, Michael Nauert (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner),
has filed an application to rezone the property commonly known as
1920 West Golf Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) ,
legally described as follows:
The East 281.0 feet of Lot 5 (except from said tract of the
North 475.0 feet thereof) in Meier Bros. subdivision, being
a subdivision of part of Sections 10 and 15, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, Cook
County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from R -X to R-1 (Single Family Residential) District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 51-Z-90) before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 28th day of
June, 1990 pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having been
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 12th day of June,
1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA
51-Z-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village
of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this Ordinance to
an R-1 (Single Family Residential) District.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1990.
ATTEST: Gerald L. Farley, Village President
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VI OF CHAPTER 18
ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2016, Schedule XVI entitled
"Prohibited operation of Certain Vehicles Upon Certain Streets"
of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper
alphabetic sequence 11 Briarwood Drive East - 5 ton load limit" and
"Briarwood Drive West - 5 ton load limit"; so that hereinafter
Schedule XVI of Chapter 18 shall include the following:
it Description of
Name of Street Prohibition Thereon
Briarwood Dr. East 5 ton load limit
Briarwood Dr. West 5 ton load limit it
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form the manner provide by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
1990.
vILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSP.LCT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Wk--
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-45-V-90, EUGENE J. KOZIOL
LOCATION: 519 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
DATE: JULY 12, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for variances filed by Mr. Eugene Koziol of 510 South Edward Street. The
application was filed to increase the permitted 15 foot driveway width to 17 feet, and to
permit a parking pad with a zero foot front setback and a 0.5 foot sideyard. Mount Prospect
Zoning Ordinance requires a 30 foot front setback and a 7.5 foot sideyard.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting,
Mr. Koziol presented testimony in support of the request. He also presented a letter from
his neighbors, Mr. & Mrs. McClellan at 517 South Edward Street, stating that they had no
objections provided the parking pad be pitched to ensure that no drainage flowed onto their
property. Nth Koziol explained that the variance was necessary to accommodate the
household's three vehicles. He stated that the pad would be constructed to drain toward
the street.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. It was noted that similar front and
sideyard encroachments to accommodate parking pads are present in the immediate
neighborhood. The Zoning Board confirmed that all drainage would be toward the street
and not onto adjoining property.
Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the request for a 17 foot driveway, a zero foot front setback and 0.5 foot
sideyard for a parking pad at 519 South Edward Street.
DMC:hg
57/7 S, k Li' p r L
`�o rte"
Fes:
PKOfOSO%> Pr+kXlrJS PAD Ar
5G -ALE , /" • AO'
f 4;
,� L> vU H K 7 T.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 45-V-90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: July 12, 1990
Eugene Koziol
519 South Edward Street
June 26, 1990
Variations are requested from the following
Sections of the Ordinance: 1. Section 14.3016.A
to allow a 17 foot driveway for a one -car garage
instead of the maximum allowed 15 foot. 2.
Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot front
yard instead of the required 30 foot. 3. Section
14.1102.13 to allow a 1/2 foot sideyard to permit
a parking pad on the north side of the driveway.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case as being a request by Eugene Koziol for variations
to allow a 17 foot driveway for a one -car garage, and a variation to reduce the required
sideyard to 1/2 foot for a.parking pad.
Mr. Eugene Koziol introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he presently has
a one -car garage at his residence with a narrow driveway. He indicated he would like to
construct a parking pad in the sideyard to allow parking for an additional car. He indicated
that it is very difficult to maneuver cars in and out of the one -car driveway and that he
would benefit from the convenience of having a parking apron in the required side yard.
Mr. Koziol stated that his contractor had indicated that the driveway pad could be
constructed in a fashion that would not discharge storinwater run-off to the adjoining home
at 517 South Edward Street.
Mr. Clements then summarized the request and stated that a staff inspection of the property
in the immediate neighborhood found several residents with one -car garages and parking
aprons on the same street. Mr. Clements indicated that the proposed parking apron would
ZBA-45-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 2 of 2
not be out of character with the neighborhood. He also stated that the engineer noted that
careful grading should be followed to make sure that the parking apron does not increase
stormwater run-off onto the adjoining property. He stated this concern is important because
the home next door has a below -grade garage.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that the parking
pad would be in keeping with'the character of this neighborhood, and that as long as the
parking apron could be constructed so as to not cause stormwater run-off to the adjoining
properties, there would be no objections to the request.
The Zoning Board of Appeals also made reference to a letter in support of the request from
Mr. & Mrs. McClellan, the adjoining property owner at 517 South Edward Street.
Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Pratt moved that the
request be approved subject to engineer approval of a grading plan prior to issuance of a
building permit. Themotion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik
W
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
`t. M. WW'h&
David M. Clements
. &LAGE OF MOUNT PROSP,..,T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN q v ---
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND (ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA45-V-90, EUGENE J. KOZIOL
LOCATION: 519 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
DATE: JULY 5, 1990
REQUE
The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.3016.A-3 so that a 17 foot driveway for
a one -carr garage may be constructed. A 15 foot driveway is permitted. A second variation
from Section 14.11.02.A is requested so that a zero foot front setback may be maintained.
A 30 foot front yard is required under Code. The petitioner requests a third variation from
Section 14.1102.13 to allow a OS foot sideyard for a parking pad.
VILLAGE AFF" COMMENTS
Engineering is concerned that a drainage problem could be created because the home to
the north has a garage floor below the grade of the street, The potential drainage problem
could be solved by placing the parking pad on the opposite side of the existing driveway.
Inspection Services notes that because of the drainage problem the driveway must be built
at or below existing grade.
PLANNING ND NG COMMENTS
Mr. Koziol would like to widen the existing driveway at his residence to 17 feet. This will
accommodate the household's three vehicles.
Staff notes the grade change which will require constructing the parking pad such that
drainage is directed back onto the applicant's property and not on the neighbor's lot.
Similar front and-sideyard encroachments to accommodate parking pads are present in the
immediate neighborhood, so this request would not create a new condition in the area.
The staff has no objections to the parking apron, but believe a carefully engineered grading
plan is the only way to prevent additional run-off on the adjoining property.
DMC:hg
vILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER WP('
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-53-V-90, PAUL A. AND BARBARA J. MAIER
LOCATION: 319 SOUTH BEVERLY LANE
DATE: JULY 13, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for a variation filed by Mr. Paul Maier. The application was filed to permit
a 6 foot sideyard to accommodate a room addition. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance
allows a 10 foot sideyard on this lot.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting,
Mr. Maier presented testimony in support of the request. Mr. Maier explained that the pie -
shape of the lot resulted in the very wide street frontage from which the sideyard
requirement was determined. He also noted that a 8'-10' hedge along the property line
would screen the addition from the neighbors, and that the addition would be no closer than
15 feet from the neighbor's house. Mr. Maier also explained that the addition was necessary
to enlarge the family room which currently only holds four people comfortably.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and noted that the pie -shape of the lot
and the position of the existing home on the lot, contributed to the hardship. The Zoning
Board also noted that no one objected to the request and that the addition would not
adversely impact the neighborhood.
Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the request for a 6 foot sideyard to accommodate a room addition at 319
South Beverly Lane.
DMC:hg
BEVERLY
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 53-V-90 Hearing Date: July 12, 1990
PETTrIONER: Paul Maier
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
319 South Beverly Street
PUBLICATION DATE:
June 26, 1990
REQUEST:
A variation is requested from Section 14.1102.B
to allow a 6 foot sideyard setback for a room
addition instead of the required 10 foot
minimum setback.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
None
Chairman Basnik introduced the request and stated that the application was filed to reduce
the 10 foot required sideyard to 6 feet to permit the construction of a room addition.
Mr. Paul Maier introduced himself to the Zoning Board and indicated that he would like
to construct a family room addition on the rear of his home at 319 South Beverly Lane. He
indicated that his property is a pie -shaped lot and that the proposed room addition is
requested to be 6 feet from the lot line at the nearest point. Mr. Maier indicated that it
would be difficult to offset the room addition to meet the 10 foot required sideyard, and that
this would lead to increased construction costs and would affect the size and desirability of
the room addition. He noted that there is a mature hedge between his property and 321
South Beverly Street and that this landscaping would screen visibility of the room addition.
Mr. Clements then presented the staff summary of this petition and concurred with Mr.
Maier's statements that this is an irregular-shaped parcel. Mr. Clements noted that the side
lot lines are not parallel and that this plus the placement of the house on the lot contributes
somewhat to the hardship with the case. Mr. Clements noted that it would be difficult to
build a reasonably sized room addition without variations due to the location of the house
on the lot. Mr. Clements noted that a staff inspection of the neighborhood found substantial
side yards and open space on all nearby lots, but that the 6 foot setback proposed for this
room addition was sufficient, and emphasized that the 6 foot dimension is only the closest
ZBA-53-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 2 of 2
point of the room addition, and that the setback increases to 8 feet at the point where the
room addition meets the existing home. Mr. Clements also pointed out the fact that an
adjoining densely -planted shrub would screen the room addition from the neighbor's
property.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that the pie -
shaped lot contributes to a hardship in meeting the 10 foot required sideyard. The Zoning
Board also noted that because of the pie -shaped lot and the extreme frontage of this
property, the side yard requirement is at the maximum of the Ordinance and not necessarily
typical with the neighborhood.
Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that
the Zoning Board recommend approval of a variation to reduce the 10 foot required
sideyard to 6 feet for the property at 319 South Beverly Lane. The motion was seconded
by Mrs. Skowron.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
David M. Clements
.,LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSP,,--T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-53-V-90, PAUL A. AND BARBARA J. MAIER
LOCATION: 319 SOUTH BEVERLY LANE
DATE: JULY S, 1990
R]" TIL
The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14.1102.13 to allow -a sideyard of 6 feet.
The Code requires a sideyard to be 10 ft. or 10% of lot width whichever is less. The
petitioner proposes to construct a room addition.
3aLIAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Both Engineering and Inspection Services suggest that no fill is to be placed in the sideyard
which would alter drainage. Grading plans should also be submitted.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS
Mr. Maiees home is on a pie -shaped lot at 319 South Beverly Lane. The house is quite
small. He hopes to construct an addition to enlarge the current family room which only
holds four people comfortably.
Because of the location of the house on the lot, any addition to the building would encroach
on the required sideyard.
A dense, 8' -IV hedge is located along the property line and would screen the addition from
the neighboring residence. At the narrowest point, the addition would be 15 feet from the
neighbor's house.
The pie -shape of the lot and the position of the existing home on the lot, contribute to the
need for a variation. Considering these hardships, and the amount of screening provided,
staff recommends approval of the request.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Tvk----
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNIINOOG�' �. __AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-54-V=90, ZBA-55-SU-90, CRAIG STEZSKAL
LOCATION: 32 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
DATE: JULY 27, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
the application filed by Craig Sterskal. The application affects the property at 32 South
Busse Road and includes the fallowing requests:
- Special Use Permit to allow a three -car garage.
- Variance to Section 14.301.6 to allow a 60 foot turn -around in a driveway instead
of the maximum 21 feet allowed.
Mr. Sterskal presented testimony• port of the request. He explained
would make access onto busy Busse "• ill be
used to store an antique
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that three -car garages on large
lots with large houses are becoming fairly typical. The Board stated that the large size of
this lot (113' X 385') and the landscaping proposed would ensure that this development
would not have any adverse impact on the area. The Zoning Board also aclnowledged the
busy condition of Busse Road and the safety advantage of a driveway turn -around to
eliminate backing out onto Busse Road.
Accordingly, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a three -
car garage and a 60 foot driveway turn -around at 32 South Busse Road.
, DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 54-V-90
55 -SU -90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: July 26, 1990
Craig Sterskal
32 South Busse Road
June, 26, 1990
Variation from Section
14.3016 to permit a 60'
diameter turnaround for a
driveway. Special Use permit
for a three -car garage.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Michaele Skowron
None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that this is a
continuation from the July 12, 1990 Zoning Board of Appeals
meeting. Chairman Basnik continued by stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variation from Section 14.3016 -to
permit a 60' diameter turnaround for a driveway. The
petitioner is also requesting a Special Use permit for a
three -car garage.
The petitioner, Craig Sterskal of 32 South Busse Road,
presented his case by stating that he plans to build a home
on Busse Road and the request for the turnaround on his
driveway is for easier access pulling into and out of his
driveway. Mr. Sterskal also stated that the request for the
three -car garage is he owns an antique car and would like to
store it in the garage and also use it for his two other
cars.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the requests have no adverse effect on surrounding neighbors,
and the driveway would only have one curb cut onto Busse Rd.
He also noted that three -car garages are becoming more
typical on new homes.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion,to grant the
ZBA-54-V=90
ZBA-55-SU-90
July 26,1990
Page 2 of 2
petitioners request -for a variation from Section 14.3016 to
permit a 60' diameter turnaround for a driveway.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 4-0.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioner a Special Use permit for a three -car garage.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 4-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
ViLiuLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEt f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-54-V-90, ZBA-55-SU-90, CRAIG STEZSKAL
LOCATION: 32 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
DATE: JULY 20, 1990
REQUEST
The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14.3016 to permit a 60 foot diameter turn-
around for a driveway. Under Code, 21 feet is the maximum diameter allowed for a
driveway. The request also includes a Special Use permit for a three -car garage.
Village staff note the following concerns:
1. The property must be subdivided into one lot of record.
2. Fifty (50) feet of public right-of-way must be dedicated along Busse Road.
3. Permission for driveway access to Busse Road must be obtained from the County.
4. "Nater is available on the west side of Busse Road. Sanitwy sewer may need to
be extended from Frediani Court, north and under Busse Road to reach this
property. leo storm sewers exist in this area.
5. Grading plans showing existing and proposed conditions on the site and within 100
feet of the property should be submitted with the building plans.
Mr. & Mrs. Ste skal hope to build a new house on the vacant lot at 32 South Busse Road.
They filed the application to allow construction. of a three -car garage and 60' diameter turn-
around in the driveway.
propertyT"he property is substantially larger (43,556 sq. ft.) than the minimum 8,125 sq. ft. required.
As a result, excessive setbacks are proposed. The proposed three -car • « * r garage
Page 2
ZBA-54-V-90, ZBA-55-SU-90
July 20, 1990
with the construction of many new homes, three -car garages are becoming more of a
standard feature. The proposed garage should have no adverse effect on adjoining
properties.
The proposed driveway design will allow motorists to turn around, rather than backing out
onto busy Busse Road. The large diameter of the turn -around is needed to accommodate
maneuvering of vehicles. A 10 foot circular island= is located in the center of the turn-
around to break up the paved area. A planted berm is proposed to screen the turn -around
from the street.
Based on the observed excessive size of the lot and its location on a busy arterial road, staff
has no objections to the request. It should also be noted that lot coverage is not a factor
with this large lot.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-56-V-90, ANDREW E. CIABATTARI
LOCATION: 112 NORTH EASTWOOD
DATE: JULY 13, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application filed by Mr. Andrew Ciabattari of 112 North Eastwood Avenue. The
application was filed to permit a 2 foot sideyard and a 15 foot height for a new garage.
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows a 5 foot sideyard and 12 foot height for a
detached garage.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting,
Mr. Ciabattari presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that the
requested 2 foot setback would be consistent with the existing garage, which will be
removed, and with his neighbor's garage to the west. He stated that no maintenance or
drainage problems occurred with his existing garage setback. He noted that a hedge along
his neighbor's property to the north would screen the garage. He also indicated that his
neighbors were aware of his proposal and had no objections. He stated that a 15 foot
garage height would provide extra storage space. The additional height would be
incorporated into the roof which will be barn -shaped with minimal overhangs.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting staff concerns with maintenance
and drainage limitations in a 2 foot sideyard. The Zoning Board noted that no one objected
to the request and that the 2 foot sideyard was consistent with other garages in the
neighborhood. The Zoning Board found that maximizing the useable backyard area was a
consideration, given the narrow, 55'-0" width of the lot. The Zoning Board also found that
providing additional storage space in the garage is a legitimate request.
Accordingly, by a 4-1 vote, the Zoning Board of .Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a request for a 2 foot sideyard for a new garage at 112 North Eastwood
Avenue; and by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning .,Board recommends that the Village Board approve
a 15 foot height for a new detached garage at 112 North East Avenue.
DMC:hg
"'"
co
Ail 2%Or
9
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 56-V-90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Hearing Date: July 12, 1990
Andrew Ciabattari
112 North Eastwood
June 26, 1990 ,
A variation is requested from Section 14.102.B.2
and 3 to permit a 2 foot sideyard instead of the
required 5 foot and a 15 foot height instead of
the allowed 12 foot for a detached garage.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik introduced this requestIstated that thea1• •1wasfiled to reduce
the 5 foot required sideyard for a detached garage to 2 feet and for a
increase the 12 •• ma)dmum height
to
height
would be for typical,•- - storage - not forprohibited -storage or 1111"
•1 ,1 1 1 1 1 w1 I N 111 • I!1�
1'" « 1 � 1 1 1 1 1 11 •' • « i1
there are many detached garages yards1,•not meet the current setback
requirements. He also stated that the staff had no objections to the height variation
provided that this area is usedjustfor •residential
• m
ZBA-56-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 2 of 2
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and Chairman Basnik questioned the
petitioner on, the need for the two foot sideyard, and if the sideyard could be increased
somewhat to meet the concerns of the staff. Mr. Ciabattari indicated that he did not share
the concerns about the maintenance of the structure with a 2 foot sideyard and pointed to
the existing one -car garage on his property with a 2., foot sideyard. He indicated that there
had been no maintenance problems with this structure and he would not envision any such
problems with the new garage- with a similar 2 foot setback.
The Zoning Board further discussed the request and it was noted that several other garages
adjoining the petitioner's property are built on the same 2 foot setback and that the
proposed variation would not be out of character with the area.
Mrs. Skowron noted that this is a typical request in an older neighborhood, but believed
maintenance could be a problem if there were some change in conditions in the
neighborhood, such as a fence near the garage. She believed that a 3 foot presented a good
compromise with this request.
Mr. Brettrager pointed out that the eave overhanging the sideyard reduces the effect of the
2 foot sideyard even more. Mr. Lannon indicated that he believed a 2 foot sideyard was
appropriate considering the character of the neighborhood. Mr. Basnik stated that he
believed a 3 foot sideyard would be sufficient on this lot.
After discussion, Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Brettrager moved that
the Zoning Board recommend approval of a 2 foot sideyard for a detached garage. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, and Basnik
NAYS: Skowron
Motion carried by a vote of 4-1.
Chairman Basnik then asked for a motion on the height variation. Mrs. Skowron moved
that the variation to permit a 15 foot high garage be approved. The motion was seconded
by Mr. Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, and Basnik
NAYS: Skowron
The motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
-b. M- c4w-�
David M. Clements
NLLIAGE OF MOUNT PROSP t
MANMG AND ZOMNG DUAKrWUW
Mount Prospect, Minals
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN =
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PIANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-S&V-90, ANDREW E. CIABATTARI
LOCATION: 112 NORTH EASTWOOD
DATE: I JULY 51 1990
The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a 2 foot sideyard for
an accessory building. The Code requires detached accessory buildings to maintain a
minimum setback of S feet from any interior lot line. "The petitioners also request a
variation from Section 14.102.B.3.b to allow a 15 foot high garage. The maximum height
for a garage is 12 feet.
Inspection Services believes that a 2 foot sideyard could create potential problems for
maintenance purposes. If an easement is located on property, then the garage should not
encroach on that easement No fill should be placed in the sideyard to alter drainage.
Engineering notes that lot coverage will be about 41%. Grading plans should be submitted.
Downspouts should be directed to the front or rear of the lot
. Ciabattari hopes to remove the existing garage, and construct a new garage at 112
North Eastwood. The proposed location of the new garage is 2 feet from the side lot line
which is consistent with the existing garage setback.
Staff notes that several other accessory buildings in the neighborhood also encroach on
sideyards. Staff is concerned with drainage and maintenance access within such a small
setback and suggests that providing a 3 foot setback would help alleviate these potential
problems. In addition, 3 feet represents a variation of less than 5 of the ordinance
requirement This is an important consideration in terms of setting precedent and
maintainingthe intent of the setback standard.
Page 2
ZBA-56-V-90
July 5, 1990
With regard to the request for a 15 foot garage height, staff does not object to this variance
for the purposes of providing additional storage space. However, this additional space
should not be used as living space.
Staff also notes that a 12'-15' dense hedge along the neighbor's property line will screen
the new garage.
Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the height variance request, and
a sideyard setback of 3 feet rather than the 5 feet required
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-57-V-90, CLARENCE AND MARILYN SCHOLLA
LOCATION: 20 AUDREY LANE
DATE: JULY 12, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for variances filed by Mr. Clarence Scholla of 20 Audrey lane. The
application was filed to permit an 18" sideyard setback for a parking apron and to permit
a 30 foot driveway at the widest point of the apron. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance
allows an 8.2 foot sideyard and a 15 foot driveway for a one -car garage.
The Zoning Berard generally discussed the request, noting that paving the parking pad would
have aesthetic and maintenance advantages. They also noted that only the remainder of the
driveway would be 9'-" wide, which is permitted. The Zoning Board found that no one
objected to the request and that the proposed parking pad would not adversely impact the
neighborhood.
Accordingly, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve the request for an 18" sideyard and 30 foot driveway width to accommodate
parking N:M at 20 Audrey
DMC:hg
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 57-V-90
PETTITONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Hearing Date: July 12, 1990
Clarence Scholla
20 Audrey Lane
June 26, 1990
Variations are requested from the follo
sections of the Zoning Code: 1. Section
14.1102 to permit an 18" sideyard setback for
a parking apron instead of 87 as required by
Code. 2. Section 14.3016 to allow a 30 foot
drive at' the widest point instead of the
maximum 15 foot allowed by Code.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Basnik Bas'"introduced the request and stated that the application was filed for
variations of the permitted driveway width to allow a 30 foot driveway at its widest point
and an 18" sideyard.
Mr. & Mrs. Scholla addressed the Zoning Board and Mated that they, have "sting
asphalt driveway that is deteriorated and that they would like to replace the entire driveway
with a new asphalt drive. They noted that there is an existing gravel parking apron at the
end of the driveway near detached garage and t . area is 'used for their small,
recreational vehicle. They indicated that at this time they would like to pave this parking
area while they are replacing the existing driveway. Mr. Scholla stated that this area had
never been paved, and, that the variation is necessary for this pavement width.
Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and indicated that the
proposed driveway is 30 feet at its widest point, that area being the lcoation of the parking
g
apron near, the end of the driveway., Mr. Clements noted that most of the driveway is a 9
foot driveway leading up to the detached garage. Mr. Clements stated that the area in
question s presently a gravel parking area and that, for several reasons, paving this location
ZBA-57-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 2 of 2
may be more attractive and might better control the stormwater run-off than the emoting
gravel surface. He also noted that the staff had found, in this neighborhood, several other
parking pads in rear yards near detached garages, and that this proposal would not be out
of character with the area.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was noted that the
request for the variation is merely to upgrade the property and to provide paving for an
existing gravel area, and that this would be more attractive for the adjoining property than
the existing gravel parking apron.
There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr.
Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of a 30 foot wide driveway
for a parking apron and a reduced sideyard for the property at 20 Audrey Lane. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
-b-M - cthKA-Ii�l
David M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPkCT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENr
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLE NTS, DIRECTOR OF P1,ANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-57-V 90, CLARENCE AND MARILYN SCHOLIA
LOCATION: 20 AUDREY LANE
DATE.- JULY 5, 1990
The applicants request a variation from Section. 14.1102 to permit an 18" sideyard for a
parking apron. The current regulations require 5.2 ft. (10% of lot width) side d. The
petitioners also request a variation from Section 143016 to allow a 30 foot driveway at the
widest point of the apron. The maximum width allowed under Code is 15 feet for a one -
car garage.
The drainage pattern is toward the existing garage. Inspection Services suggests that the
new drive should be built at or below existing grade so as not to alter drainage.
The addition of the parldng apron requires a portion of the driveway to be wider than the
15 foot maximum width ,. • w underCode.• • variance to allow a 30 foot
width only pertains to the parking apron area. The remainder of the driveway will be 9-
6" wide which 'is permitteA
all
• • • • • 4 • • • . • • • • r • • " • • • • • • i • • • • • " ,
WFUR
potential • ift • loose SIM ontotheneighboeslawn.
Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the request.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospipct, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER PCI'
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING IAND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-58-V-90, THOMAS AND MARY KAY DETERMANN
LOCATION: 613 NORTH RUSSEL
DATE: JULY 16, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for variances filed by Mr. Thomas Determann of 613 North Russel Street.
The application was filed to permit a 16.5 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage and a 2.5
foot sideyard setback for a parking pad. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows a 15 foot
driveway and a 6 foot sideyard setback.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting. of July 12, 1990. At the meeting,
Mr. Determann presented testimony in support of the request. He stated that his current
driveway is only 11 feet wide and cannot accommodate the family's three vehicles. Mr.
Brian Soltys, representing his father Frank J. Soltys of 615 North Russel Street, stated that
a 16.5 foot driveway would not be objectionable and is consistent with other driveways .on
the block. However, he expressed concern about the aesthetics, since the existing shrubs in
Mr. Determann's sideyard would have to be removed to make room for the parking pad.
Mr. Determann d Mr. Soltys agreed to negotiate on this issue and work out final details
prior to the Village Board meeting on August 7, 1990.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request noting that similar driveway widths and
parking pads are present in, the neighborhood. The Zoning Board confirmed that all
drainage would be toward the street and not onto adjoining property.
According, by a 5-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that the Village Board approve the
request for a 16.5 foot wide driveway and a 2.5 foot sideyard setback for a parking pad a'j
613 North Russel Street
DMC:hg
LOT is IN SLOCIL IN "VIN 04
NORTH Wt S1 1/4 OF THE NORTH Wit
WEST 1/4 OF SECTION 349JO11WI1t
PATKIPA4 MIDIA"s IN ;a% ;4W
4V#9 A SUSDIVISIQN OF Ing
6 NORTH EAST 1/4 CW pa NORTH
RANGE 11 EAST (P TW THIRO
m
J.
Staft of
Commi y of cook
op X000011411
JENS K. DOE SURVEY SERVICE, INC. don hereby certify that a survey hu been mode
order
Its dimcdon. by a Registered Illinois Lend Surveyor of alge property described hereon and that
NOTE
the
plot birmun drown is gg correct r*pmWjgjgjW@ of said survey.
40" 414 met go be ummoll a wskd.
Cbi=go. Illinois Dated 10TH day of
WLL
cliplion soled as This 041 igg 0 *"y of
990
(Of accuracy MUST to tw*"#**
Fm
JENS K. DOE SURVEY SERVICE. INC oh �
boildial rnisaglism "to, go yew
of comitlelTHOMAS
J. POPK EZ. i�
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 58-V-90 Hearing Date: July 12, 1990
PETITIONER: Thomas Determann
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 613 North Russel
PUBLICATION DATE: June 26, 1990
REQUEST: Variations are requested from the following:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 16 1/2 foot wide
driveway for a one -car garage instead of the
maximum allowed 15 foot. 2. Section
14.1102.B.1 to permit . 2 1/2 foot sideyard
setback for a parking pad instead of the
required 6 foot.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Brian Soltys
Chairman Basnik introduced the request and stated that this application was filed to
ir(A. a
Mr. Determann introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he presently has
anarrow one -car driveway leading to a one -car, garage and would like to expand the
driveway to a dimension sufficient for parking two of three automobiles in the famfly.
He stated that the widen driveway would be a convenience and d not require
maneuvering cars in and out of the driveway and garage and provide a better parking
situation on this lot for his family.
Mr. Clements summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and indicated that the staff
report erroneously stated that a 21 foot driveway was proposed and that the exact request
is for a 161/2 foot driveway. Mr. Clements stated,that he had interpreted a dimension
on the survey and that the 161/2 foot driveway was the actual request. Mr. Clements stated
that the staff had reviewed the subject property and neighborhood, and found that along
ZBA-58-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 2 of 2
North Russel Street, there are a number of existing homes with one -car garages with wider
driveways that serve- as a parking apron. Accordingly, the request would not be out of
character with the neighborhood.
Mr. Brian Soltys introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he is representing
his father who lives in the home nextdoor. He stated that he was concerned if three
existing bushes at the corner -of the house would be removed, and suggested that those
remain. Mr. Determann stated that to construct the parking apron near the garage, would
require the removal of the bushes, and that he did not believe they could be saved and still
install the parking' apron in the proposed location.
Mr. Basnik suggested that Mr. Determann and Mr. Soltys' father get together to discuss
their request and noted that the 16 1/2 foot driveway was not an excessive variation, and
hoped that Mr. Determann could show his property, survey to Mr. Soltys to relieve, any
concerns he might have with the variation.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and, as with similar applications, noted
that the parking apron would not be out of character with the neighborhood, and stated that
the stormwater drainage would be directed towards the street and not at an ad oining
property.
After discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Brettrager
moved that the Zoning Board recommend approval of a 16 1/2 foot driveway and a reduced
sideyard at 613 North Russel Street. The motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik,
YS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
D.M. upvr�
David M. Clements
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPLC17
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLE S, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-58-V-90, THOMAS AND MARY KAY DETERMANN
LOCATION: 613 NORTH RUSSEL
DATE: JULY 59 1990
The petitioner requests a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to increase the driveway width
to 21 feet. Maximum width for driveways for one -car garages is 15 feet. A second variation
is requested front Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 2.5 foot sideyard. Under Code, any interior
side yard must be 10% of lot width or 10 feet, whichever is less..
The applicants would like to widen their existing 15 foot driveway by 6' feet. A 21 foot
driveway is needed to accommodate the family's three cars, which do not adequately fit in
the existing driveway.
Staff notes that several neighboring residences have installed wide driveways for one -car
garages. Staff concurs with the suggestion by Inspection Services that the driveway approach
remain 15 feet wide.•, the existing driveway approach width would be •w
sistent
with neighboring
Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the request.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: .JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER PC-
FROM:
DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ANDZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-59-V-90, MICHAEL KAUTZ
LOCATION: 730 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
DATE: JULY 16, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application for variances filed by Mr. Kautz and William Annen of 730 East Northwest
Highway. The application was filed to allow:
1. A zero foot front yard. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires- a 30 foot front yard.
2. A zero foot sideyard. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 10 foot sideyard;
3. Zero foot perimeter yards for parking. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a
10 foot parking setback;
4. 100% lot surface coverage. Mount Prospect Ordinance allows 75% lot coverage.
5. Ten parking spaces. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires 21 spaces.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 12, 1990. At the meeting,
Mike Kautz presented testimony in support of the ' request. Mr. Kautz stated that the
building addition was needed to provide additional storage space. He indicated that his
business didn't generate a large parking demand and that the 10 spaces requested plus three
existing on -street spaces would be more than adequate to meet normal demand. He further
acknowledged that he had negotiated a sideyard setback compromise with the adjacent
property owner, Mr. Vic Faraci of 770 East Northwest Highway. They agreed that a 2.5 foot
setback would alleviate Mr. Faraci's original concerns about light and air circulation
between buildings. Mr. Faraci was at the meeting and expressed no objection to a 2.5 foot
setback.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and found that a zero foot front yard
setbacks are very common in commercial areas along Northwest Highway. They also
acknowledged the limited parking demand associated with Mr. Kautz's business and that the
current lot coverage is 100%.
Accordingly, by a vote of 5-0, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village
Board approve a request for a zero foot front yard, 2.5 foot sideyard, zero perimeter yards
for parking, 100% lot coverage, and 10 parking spaces at 730 East Northwest Highway.
DMC:hg
I
0
a
3 4 5
o. .,
O
00
Larso�Nt �uu�.ea►o�rrs ��as,► �.;
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 59-V-90
PETITIONER: -
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT:
Hearing Date: July 12, 1990
Michael Kautz
730 East Northwest Highway
June 26, 1990--
1
The
990--
The applicant is proposing to construct a
commercial rcial addition resulting in a request for
variations from the following Sections of the
Code: 1. Section 14.2002.A to permit a zero
foot front yard instead of the required 30 feet.
2. Section 14.2002.13 to permit a zero foot side
yard instead of the required 10 foot. 3. Section
142002.E to permit zero °perimeter yards for
parking 4. Section 14.3012 to allow 10 parking
spaces instead of the required 21 spaces. 5.
Section 14.2003 to all 1 lot surface
coverage rather than the required 75%.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Richard Pratt
Michaele Skowron
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Vic Faraci, 770 E. Northwest Highway
Chairman Basnik introduced the request to the, Zoning Board and stated that the
application was filed for a number of variations to allow the construction of a commercial
addition for Kautz Carpets at, 730 East Northwest Highway.
Mr. Michael Kautz introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated that he had filed the
application to allow the construction of an addition at his business to serve as additional
storage area. He nested that he presently has some storage in an old trailer behind the
building, and that this proposed addition would allow centralized storage and would better
serge his needs and allow for the future growth of his business.He noted that the request
includes a reduction of a 10 foot required sideyard to a zero foot sideyard and a parking
variation to allow 10 off-street spaces ,rather than 21.
Concerning the parking variation, Mr. Kautz noted that his customer demand is not as high
ZBA-59-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 2 of 4
as the 21 spaces that would be required of the Zoning Ordinance. Heindicated that in his
business he typically had 3 or 4 customers per day on a weekday, and thea on a weekend
there are 8 to 10 customers per day. Mr. Kautz noted that there is on -street parking along
Northwest Highway and that the 10 spaces proposed behind the building would be sufficient
for all his employee and customer needs.
Concerning the sideyard reduction, Mr. Kautz noted that ,.the proposed addition is to be
constructed in an area that is presently an access drive to the rear of his property, and that
the dimension of this driveway is 10 feet, and he would like to construct the addition over
this entire driveway width. He stated that the 10 foot dimension is necessary to allow
proper working space and storage inside the room addition, and that it would be very
difficult to reduce the size of the addition and meet his needs, if he had to meet he 10 foot
required sideyard. However, Mr. Kautz stated that he understood the concerns about the
reduced sideyard adddre 'in, the staff, report, and that he had a discussion with the
adjoining property owner at 770 East Northwest Highway, Mr. Faraci. Mr. Kautz noted that
he, at thistime, would like to modify his request; `to allow a 2 1/2 foot sideyard and that
this 2 1/2 foot dimension would still permit him adequate storage area in the addition, and
would allow a sufficient amount of light and air to the property at 770 East Northwest
Highway.
Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and stated that there
were five variations with the request. He indicated that the first was for a zero foot front
yard rather than 30 feet. Mr. Clements noted that many buildings along Northwest Highway
are constructed right at the front property line near the sidewalk and that the proposed
addition would be in character with the area, and would have no detrimental impact on the
line of stores along Northwest Highway. However, Mr. Clements stated he was concerned
with the original sideyard reduction to a zero foot yard. Mr. Clements noted that the
adjoining property of 770 East Northwest Highway had seven office windows and four air
conditioning units in the side yard between the structures and that the zero foot sideyard
would adversely effect light, air and perhaps maintenance to this building. Mr. Clements
indicated that he was; pleased with the compromise to allow a 2 1/2 foot sideyard, but that
the staff would recommend a 5 foot sideyard to better allow open space between the
structures and to reduce the amount of variation in precedent with this request.
Next, Mr. Clements discussed the zero foot parking lot setbacks. He stated that this
variation is a function of , the lot width, and that . this merely reflects existing conditions on
the property. He stated that, with the new commercial addition, parking spaces world be
striped to meet proper space dimensions and maneuvering dimensions and that these
required parking space sizes would not leave any remaining area for conforming setbacks.
He also noted that the petition included a variation to allow 100% lot coverage. Mr.
Clements noted that the property currently has a 100% lot coverage and that the proposed
addition would merely be going on an area that is presently occupied by a driveway,
therefore, there would be no increase in lot coverage or stormwater run-off with the request.
Next, Mr. Clements discussed the parking variation. He stated that staff was concerned with
reducing the 21 space requirement for this propeftty to 10 spaces. Mr. Clements
acknowledged that the retail carpet business may be a low volume operation in, temis of
ZBA-59-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 3 of 4
customer demand, but that he was concerned that putting the commercial addition in the
location of the driveway would be cutting off all customer access to the parking spaces
behind the building and thus only leaving on -street parking on Northwest Highway. Mr.
Clements noted: that the parking variation, is important, but that also it is perhaps more
signiflicant in that customers of the business would not have direct access from Northwest
Highway to those remaining parking spaces behind the building. Mr. Clements stated that
any future use of the building might have a higher demand for parking, and that he
indicated that there should be- a close examination of the parking variation and its impact
and precedence.
� M +� w w ,.� , r ► . as � �, �, M .
+� 'a� �� w� � � u •au aw n,.
a . r
The Zoning Board of Appeals then generally discussed the request and it was noted that
the zero foot front yard would not be out of character with existing conditions on Northwest
Highway and that there was no objection to having the commercial addition come out to the
front lot line at the sidewalk. Ile Zoning Board then discussed the request for a 21/2 foot
sideard and were pleased that the petitioner had eliminated the variation for a zero foot
yard and had found a compromise position that was acceptable to the adjoining property
owner. The Zoning Board believed a 2 1/2 foot sideyard would be sufficient setback for
the addition and would not have any adverse impact on the adjoining properties.
The Zoning Board then 'discussed the parking variation and there was , considerable
discussion, about customer demand for this business and access to the rear of the lot. Mr.
Pratt asked if three parlung spa +gin street would be sufficient for Kautz Carpets, and if
employees parked at the rear of the building, and if all deliveries were made in the rear.
Mr. Kautz indicated that he and his employees park at the rear of the building and that all
deliveries are made to the rear of the structure. Mr. Kautz noted that the addition would
be providing a loading and unloading area that would better define the delivery location in
his par ` g lot.
Mr. Basnik stated that he believed Mr. Kautz had sufficiently examined the customer
demand at his business and that the 1:0 spaces behind the building would be sufficient. Mr.
Lannon acknowledged Mr. Clements' remarks about the commercial addition being placed
over the drivewayi. and a customer access to the remaining spaces behind the
building. However, Mr. Lannon noted that many businesses along Northwest highway do
not have driveways to rear parking and that this would not be out of character with other
businesses. Mr. Clements noted that most such situations were small retailers in 25 foot
storefronts that did not have direct driveway access to rear par and that most of the
larger users along Northwest Highway, such as, Novak & Parker and the Prospect Bike Shop
would have direct access via a driveway to off-street parking. Mr. Clements Mated that
ZBA-59-V-90
July 12, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Kautz Carpets would be a large user without any direct and reasonable access to the
customer parking. However, Mr. Clements did note that there is an existing alley thatwould
be sufficient for customer uses if individuals were aware that it provided access to parking.
Mr. Brettrager asked if there would be a rear customer entrance and Mr. Kautz stated that
there would be a customer entrance at the rear of the building.
Mr. Basnik stated that Mbunt Prospect needs to be flexible to keep such businesses in the
Central Business District and that certain variations have to be addressed and justified in
order to allow expansion of existing businesses. He stated he had no objection to the
request.
Mr. Kautz also pointed out that he had participated in the Facade Program and that he
would continue the facade design onto the front elevation of the proposed addition.
Mrs. Skowron noted that,, while she supported the expansion of local businesses, at some
point there could be a change of ownership in the property,, and she was concerned that the
parking variation and reducing the access to the rear lot, could have some adverse impact
on future users of the property.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that there was
sufficient on -street parking for most of Mr. Kautz' day to day customer needs, and that
constructing the room addition over the driveway would not adversely impact his business
or, any future users of the property. The g and be eved it was important that
he hadnegotiateda compromise with the adjoining property owner concerning the 2 1/2
foot sideyard.
Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that
the Zoning Board recommend approval of variations at Kautz Carpets to permit a zero foot
front yard instead of 30 feet, a 2 1/2 foot sideyard instead of 10 feet, a zero foot perimeter
parking setbacks at the rear of the property, a variation to reduce the required 21 parking
spaces to 10 spaces and a variation to allow 100% lot coverage rather than 75%. The
motion was seconded by Mr. Pratt.
Upon Roll Call: IAYES: Brettrager, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron and Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.'
This recommendation wM be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Respectfully submitted,
avi M. Clements
YtLIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
KANMG AM ZOMNG DEPARMWa
Mount ProspeC4 1111nois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN �
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-59-V-90, MICHAEL KAUTZ
CATION: 730 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
DATE: JULY 69 1990
The petitioner requests- the following variations:
1. A variation from Section 14.2002 to allow a zero foot front yard. A 30 foot front
yard is required.
2. A variation from Section 14.2002 to permit a zero foot side yard. A 10 foot side
yard is required.
3. A variation from Section 142002 to allow zero foot setbacks for parking.
4. A variation from Section 142003 to allow 100% lot coverage. The Code permits
75% lot coverage.
5. A variation from Section 14.3012 to allow 10 off-street parldng spaces. Currently,
the required number of spaces is 21.
I � `, � 1 °� 1 � I +� bl • • • a� t ► M • I • 1 I. Na r� 1 • • I� 1
". „� 1 , , ,..1 . / • • 1 . 1 ' 1 • 1 1 11 •.. 1 1 1 1
1 � , 1 , '.1 , , , , ' .: I"•• 1 I • '.,. '.1 • 1 1 ' � 1 •
M ,. •11 1 • �.1 •♦ .I.1 1 11 ,,,.• 1" Ir'.1 1• 1" •'.I1• sIl 1 •1• •
• 1 { • : 1 • '. • • .. 1 1/ � 1 • ' Mi • 1 "" � • • 1 " 11 ., • ' /1 • 1 I ♦S" I • 1 ' t
1'w II• 1 1 • /• •• 1°^a, 1 1« 1• .�� 1 • �1 • •11 1 • I • 1 1•
'1 •, ..Ili 11.. 1 :� M •.. ..• � • �,. 1.: s .. ,. ..1 •W •...1 "4., •... 1 1 1 I1... 11
•• I!! M 1 I :I • �1 I N 1 1 I `•�, » 11 1,"
Page 2
.Tiny 6, 1990
ZBA-59-V-90
The petitioner would like to construct a 1,900 square foot addition to the existing 3,300
square foot building, The addition would serve primarily as storage space. It should be
noted that the addition would allow for the removal of a trailer in the rear parking lot that
has been used for storage for some time.
Staff offers.the following comments on the individual variations:
1. This area along
Northwest Highway is characterized by many buildings constructed at the front lot
line. The petitioner's existing building is constructed at no setback, so the addition
is designed to meet the existing building. Staff has no objection to the front yard
variation, primarily based on the character of this commercial area.
2. In order to ma�dmize
storage space, the petitioner would like to construct the addition to the east lot line,
fully closing off the driveway to the rear parking lot from Northwest Highway. Staff
has the following concerns: _
a.) The adjaeetnf prb fefty`atMO East Northwest Highway is constrdoed at an
approximate 4 foot setback. Along this building elevation are eight office
windows and four air conditioning units. The proposed addition at a zero foot
setback would reduce light to office windows at 770 East Northwest Highway,
and might adversely effect air circulation for the air conditioning units. The
reduced setback would also make maintenance difficult for both buildingL
Also, because of width necessary for footings, a zero foot setback is not
workable.
Staff recommends a 5 foot setback be maintained along the side lot line. This
will increase the separation between the buildings, and provide more light and
air at 710 East Northwest Highway. Staff recommends this 5 foot setback be
landscaped. It should be noted that this recommendation would require a
redesign of the petitionees loading area.
b.) The reduced sideyard would prohibit access from Northwest Highway to the
rear parking lot. Access could be obtained from the alley at the r of the
property. ' . would be sufficient for delivery vehicles. However, closing
woulddriveway be an inconvenience to customers as they would not have
direct access to the parking lot. The petitioner should address this concern.
e=i Ig Allow M r• AWDS Ighag&j Mic redesignand• •;•of a
parking is proposed to be at a zero foot setback. This is an existing condidni;
Inasmuch needed • proper space and aisle staff has�•
objections.
Page
July 6,, 1990
A -59-V-90
4, yadaton to &UM IMS lQt coveragc.The paving and building presently total 100%
The proposed addition merely replaces paved area, so there is no increase In lot
coverage. The recommendation to increase the sideyard to 5 feet reduces the lot
coverage to 96%.
5. Eidsting
parking at Kautz Carpets- is non -conforming to current requirements. On-site parking,
is further reduced by the proposed addition. Three spaces on Northwest Highway
helpmeet customer demand. The petitioner should fully justify the parldng variation
by discussing parldng demand. Staff could not support a parking variation if it
contributed to overflow parldng on adjoining properties.
Also, it should be noted that space #10 on the site plan should be eliminated
Maneuvering of trucks from the alley into the loading area makes space #10
undesirable for parking.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER w9 ---
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-61-V-90, GRANT LAWRENCE
LOCATION: 802 DRESSER DRIVE
DATE: JULY 27, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Grant Lawrence. The application affects the property at 802 Dresser
Drive, and was filed to allow a variance from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a 3'-6" sideyard
instead of the required 7.2 foot sideyard.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting
Mr. Lawrence presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that he was
replacing an old concrete patio with a brick patio. The size and location of the new patio
would be identical to the former patio. Brick paving would enhance the aesthetics of the
patio. In addition, the patio is screened from the neighbors by an 8'-10' hedge. He also
referenced a petition submitted and signed by 48 neighbors stating their support for the
request.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, noting that the size and location of the
new patio is identical to the old patio. They also acknowledged the petition in favor of the
request and the improved aesthetics of the brick paving.
Accordingly, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a 3'-6'
sideyard at 802 Dresser Drive to accommodate a new patio.
4 - -- - - - - � w - 775-7
LOT „ IIS
7Yt t4.�.;!�!l'tttiiitt ItlCEt
at+t€itt. 'P11tLAIdT3da, FIt SURVEY
td?IiMAgT ftlCT ?NFA"0COttlT
GF59 Af 'tI 7407ES7CRttIIP
OF 711E N
g-
t}aYL coup7Y, .�.�, I• 70YfSit:f it .�A3`,N,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO, 61-V-90
PETITIONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: July 26, 1990
Grant Lawrence
802 Dresser Drive
July 10, 1990
Variation from Section
14.1102.B.1 to permit a a 3'-
6" sideyard for a patio.
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Michaele Skowron
None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioner is requesting a variance from Section 14.1102.B.1
to permit a 3'-6" sideyard for a patio.
The petitioner, Grant Lawrence of 802 Dresser Drive,
presented his case stating that he wanted to replace a patio
in the sideyard and did not realize that he could not replace
it exactly where it was without having to get a variation.
Mr. Lawrence continued by stating he has replaced part of the
patio that did not need a variance for with paver bricks and
would like to complete the job. Mr. Lawrence then presented
the Board with a petition with 48 names of neighbors who so
not object to the patio.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the replacement of the patio would have no impact on
surrounding neighbors and has no objection to the request.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a variance for a 3'-6" sideyard.
Mr. Pratt moved. Mr. Brettrager seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
NAYS: None
ZBA-61-V-90
July 26, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Motion carried by a vote of 4-0.
This case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIV, CHAIRMAN 4 -
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT. ZBA-61-V-90, GRANT LAWRENCE
LOCATION: 802 DRESSER DRIVE
DATE: JULY 19, 1990
REQUES
The applicant is requesting a variance from Section 14.1102.8.1 to permit a 3'-6" sideyard
for a patio. The Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 7.2 foot sideyard for this lot (10%
of lot width).
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Engineering requests that a separate grading plan be submitted if the existing patio grade
is changed during replacement. Inspection Services requests that no fill be placed in the
sideyard that will alter existing drainage patterns. Permits are required prior to
construction.
PLArMNQAND ZONING COMMENTS,
Mr. Lawrence is requesting permission to replace an old patio that extended to 3'-6" of the
property line. The new patio will be the same size as the old patio. A 6'-8' hedge exists
along the property line, screening the patio area from the neighbors.
Given the fact that the new patio will be the same size and in the same location as the old
patio, any additional impact on the neighbors will be minimal. The old patio has been
removed, and new brick paving has been laid in the portion of the patio within the required
setbacks. The new brick paving is very neat and attractive.
Based on these observations, staff recommends approval of the request.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER (ML,
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-62-V-90, JILL AND IRV EBERL
LOCATION: 609 NOAH TERRACE
DATE: JULY 30, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Jill and Iry Eberl. The application effects the property at 609 Noah
Terrace and was filed to permit a variance from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15 foot rear
yard instead of the required 25 foot rear yard.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting,
the petitioner's contractor, Gary Peterson, presented testimony in support of the request.
He described the physical characteristics of the room addition, noting that it would be
slightly smaller than an existing concrete patio. The addition would be located on top of
the existing patio, therefore, not adding any additional lot coverage. He stated that roof
run-off would be controlled by gutters on the addition and channeled into existing gutters
on the house. He also stated that he had obtained an informational hand-out from the
Village Hall that erroneously indicated a room addition could be constructed with a 15 foot
rear yard. He understood the need for the variation, and pointed out that this small
addition would have no adverse impact on adjoining properties. Mr. Peterson also indicated
that the adjoining neighbors on Noah Terrace submitted letters in support of the request.
Testimony against the request was presented by two adjoining neighbors to the east, Frank
Sense of 608 St. Cecilia and Antony and Amy Avalone of 606 St. Cecilia. Concerns were
expressed regarding existing backyard drainage problems and the impact the proposed room
addition would have on drainage patterns. Concerns were also expressed regarding the
existing rear yards. Most homes on the block are built up to the rear yard setback line, 25
feet from the property line. It was noted that no other homes on the block have building
additions, and this could set precedent. Additionally, concerns were expressed relating to
aesthetics of the proposed room addition.
Page 2
ZBA-62-V-90
July 30, 1990
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. The Board noted that the block is
characterized by large homes with deep front yards. As a result, the lots have shallow rear
yards and many come close to the maximum lot coverage allowed (45%). Board members
Basnik and Brettrager expressed reservations about setting a precedent for rear yard
encroachments. However, it was believed that the proposed room addition was small, and
would have no adverse effect on homes to the east.
Concerns were also expressed about the impact on drainage. It was noted that the amount
of hard surface on the lot would not be changed and therefore, run-off would not be
increased. In fact, gutters on the room addition would better control stormwater than run-
off from the existing patio.
Based on concerns expressed, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
approval of the 15 foot rear yard to accommodate a .room addition at 609 Noah Terrace
conditioned on:
- New construction should be brick to match existing house
Drainage (grading) plans be reviewed and approved by Village Engineer
- No additional buildings be placed on the lot
DMC:hg
hI li�dllll11,1{��1 t, ll�Ilq
5140 NORTH ELSTON AVENUE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 60646
N
1.0111119
77
CERTIFIED SURVEY CO* 6 n3:ns8
PLAT OF SURVEY
LOT 54 'NST. CECILIA SUBDIVISION, BEING A RESUBDIVISION OF LOT 2 -ANO PART OF LOTS
3 AND 6 IN METER ORO THERS SUBOIVI STON, OEING A USO IVISION Of PARTS OF SECTIONS 10
AND
15, TOWNSHIP 41 NORTH, RANGE 11 EAST OF THE THIRD PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, IN COOK
COUNTY, ILLINOIS.
W
Q �
2 /XON P7PG' AJ
101 eF.FNFX^+
a
mn
ti
2 `l
1.4—r
ai
Vt/1/nf3 S OoolNAsf J
i f,?OA/ P/Pi AJ
I r (Or CORAtf.(
C
J
�o
N
?-Sr iq
M
f,~ P/Of AT
(� LOT co"ZR
t
s<--------------
REAR ELEVATION
_ osr cr
• tw41 itl.fkf % S N-tv t e.E{ t_
_ 3`t�-TFC>t;rxp
#3k.�it�,r p_>.,
,mak #;-
AW era 3�
Yta.ipt rk.Y +-.•�.�....
31 >f} • GL'
u-cr rwr«, �•�
aa44, lM�, lrtt{'
vow.
W 3/Y -f -v -__
L`-'-------------- d
RIfIT E EVATICON .
sca .
MINUTES
OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
(Minutes
combined for 2 Identical Cases)
ZBA CASE NO. 62-V-90
Hearing Date: July 26, 1990
63-V-90
PETITIONER:
Jill and-Iry Eb6rl
Jackie Nemirow
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
609 Noah Terrace
607 Noah Terrace
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 10, 1990
REQUEST:
Variation from Section
14.1102.0 to allow a 15' rear
yard instead of the required
25' rear yard to accommodate
a room addition.,
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
ABSENT:
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Michaele Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED
PARTIES: Frank Senise, Tony Avalone
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioners are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0
to allow a 15' rear yard instead of the required 25' rear
yard to accommodate a room addition.
Mr. Gary Peterson, representing the homeowners as the general
contractor for the job, presented the case stating that both
homes are identical except built opposite of each other.
Mr. Peterson continued by stating that the petitioners
had intended to put on room additions when the house was
first constructed. They then submitted for a building permit
and were informed that only a 151 rear yard was required for
a room addition. Mr. Peterson was then contacted by the
Village stating that for a room addition a 251 rear yard is
required and they would have to get a variance for a 15' rear
yard. Chairman Basnik asked what are the room additions
intended for. Mr. Peterson stated that the room additions are
for privacy because the homes now have windows in the rear of
the buildings and can see their neighbors directly behind
them.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the need for a variance was caught in the permit review
ZBA-62-V-90
ZBA-63-V-90
July 26, 1990
Page 2 of 2
process. Mr. Clements continued by stating that these lot are
near the maximum impervious surface of 45% and there may be a
concern with drainage. He'also noted that there are no
additions on the rear of any homes on this block.
Frank Senise, 608 St. Cecilia, stated that the lots in the
area are all at the maximum impervious surface. Mr. Senise is
also concerned with the drainage and feels he will get all
the water because he is directly behind the residences. Mr.
Senise also stated that if they put on an addition everyone
else will start building additions.
Tony and Amy Avalone, 606 St. Cecilia, stated he is also
concerned with the drainage and would like to know what kind
of addition such as brick or aluminum are they going to
construct.
Mr. Peterson stated that the homes would match the original
construction of the -building and presented letters from the
next door neighbors of each petitioner stating they did not
object to the room additions. Mr. Peterson also presented the
Board with pictures of Mr. Senise and Mr. Avalone's homes
from the petitioners views from their rear windows.
The Board then generally discussed the cases. Chairman Basnik
questioned the hardship of the cases. Mr. Brettrager felt if
the additions would blend in with the rest of the house it
would be okay. Chairman Basnik and Mr. Brettrager have
reservations regarding the 25" rear yard.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a 151 rear yard to construct a room
addition with the condition that the drainage be reviewed and
approved by the Village Engineer , no additional structures
on the property, and the additions match the existing
structures.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 4-0.
These Cases must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W L
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-62-V.90, JILL AND IRV EBERL
LOCATION: 609 NOAH TERRACE
DATE: JULY 19, 1990
REQUEST
The applicants are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a 15 foot rear
yard to accommodate a proposed room addition. The Code requires a 25 foot rear yard
setback.
ffl@ WWJ� 1 �3�
Engineering and Inspection Services request that grading plans showing existing and
proposed conditions be submitted with the building plans. No fill shall be placed which
would alter existing drainage patterns.
PLANNING AND ZONTN
G COMMENTS
Mr & Mrs. Eberl hope to construct a 13' X 20' room addition on the back of their home
at 609 Noah Terrace. Staff notes that this property, like many in the block, has a shallow
(28') rear yard due to the location of the house on the lot. This severely limits opportunities
to construct additions, decks, or other structures in the rear yard without seeking a rear yard
variance. Staff also notes that t ' he minimum 25 foot rear yard for primary structures has
been maintained by other properties in the block.
The room addition will be placed in the same location,as the existing concrete patio. It will
not be any larger. Subsequently, the addition should not result in an increase of run-off.
Downspouts could direct run-off to the sideyard rather than the rear yard which slopes
toward the neighbor's lot,
The applicants should be aware that lot coverage is at 43.5%. The maximum allowed is
45%. Consequently the area available for outdoor patio space is very limited.
Page 2
ZBA-62-V-90
July 19, 1990
The contractor for the applicant picked -up a general hand-out for decks, patios and room
additions. This hand-out erroneously stated that a room addition could be built at a 15 foot
setback. Room additions, of course, have to meet the same 25 foot setback as the house.
Upon review of the building plans, staff noted that the proposed room addition did not meet
the rear yard requirement of 25 feet, and advised the contractor that the variation was
necessary. Staff acknowledges the applicant's frustration in designing the room addition to
meet the guidelines of the hand-out. However, inasmuch as the room addition encroaches
into the rear yard, the variation is necessary. It should be noted that the information in the
hand-out has been corrected.
The proposed room addition is near the center of the house, and is only 20 feet in length.
It does not run along the entire length of the house. Accordingly, there are adequate,
setbacks from adjoining properties. With the location of the house on the lot built at a
minimum rear yard, there could be no room addition without a variation. Accordingly, a
small addition such as this proposal, the same size of the patio, may be appropriate, if there
are no justifiable objections from adjoining property owners.
DMC:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W__
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-63-V-90, JACKIE NEMIROW
LOCATION: 607 NOAH TERRACE
DATE: JULY 19, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Jill and Iry Eberl. The application effects the property at 609 Noah
Terrace and was filed to permit a variance from Section 14.1102.0 to allow a 15 foot rear
yard instead of the required 25 foot rear yard.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting,
the petitioner's contractor, Gary Peterson, presented testimony in support of the request.
He described the physical characteristics of the room addition, noting that it would be
slightly smaller than an existing concrete patio. The addition would be located on top of
the existing patio, therefore, not adding any additional lot coverage. He stated that roof
run-off would be controlled by gutters on the addition and channeled into existing gutters
on the house. He also stated that he had obtained an informational hand-out from the
Village Hall that erroneously indicated a room addition could be constructed with a 15 foot
rear yard. He understood the need for the variation, and pointed out that this small
addition would have no adverse impact on adjoining properties. Mr. Peterson also indicated
that the adjoining neighbors on Noah Terrace submitted letters in support of the request.
Testimony against the request was presented by two adjoining neighbors to the east, Frank
Senise of 608 St. Cecilia and Antony and Amy Avalone of 606 St. Cecilia. Concerns were
expressed regarding existing backyard drainage problems and the impact the proposed
room addition would have on drainage patterns. Concerns were also expressed regarding
the existing rear yards. Most homes on the block are built up to the rear yard setback line,
25 feet from the property line. It was noted that no other homes on the block have building
additions, and this could set precedent. Additionally, concerns were expressed relating to
aesthetics of the proposed room addition.
Page 2
ZBA-63-V-90
July 30, 1990
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request. The Board noted that the block is
characterized by large homes with deep front yards. As a result, the lots have shallow rear
yards and many come close to the maximum lot coverage allowed (45%). Board members
Basnik and Brettrager expressed reservations about setting a precedent for rear yard
encroachments. However, it was believed that the proposed room addition was small, and
would have no adverse effect on homes to the east.
Concerns were also expressed about the impact on drainage. It was noted that the amount
of hard surface on the lot would not be changed and therefore, run-off would not be
increased. In fact, gutters on the room addition would better control stormwater than run-
off from the existing patio.
Based on concerns expressed, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends
approval of the 15 foot rear yard to accommodate a zoom addition at 609 Noah Terrace
conditioned on:
- New construction should be brick to match existing house
- Drainage (grading) plans be reviewed and approved by Village Engineer
- No additional buildings be placed on the lot
lr)k[*Aip
NOAH TERRACE
C.r013 AVTr.1*1 CLKe
/.I V� AIN& CROSS Aorc- * cuRffl
ON /o ,, wosr
03.
Oz
c a
z
10
jr, E45fAtrmr top u??tmrs
z z
.19
S rr EAJfMIAIr IM
` -Tv-j y
t
PART"
T
FVAT1.�l�
e *5
REAM
ELEVATION
'�Suut
Ja-rtr
tp
t�1=tli�
q
:k.: v14- rG. n.e'3�1i
` -Tv-j y
t
PART"
T
FVAT1.�l�
t�1=tli�
:k.: v14- rG. n.e'3�1i
` -Tv-j y
t
PART"
T
FVAT1.�l�
stale va^-t a�^-_�-- -
ny.:e=..1, vp.rYasT
s�
a{ sp . cam•
RIGHT LEVATM `
s A yam`. d
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT.PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
(Minutes Combined for 2 Identical Cases)
ZBA CASE NO. 62-V-90 Hearing Date: July 26, 1990
63-V-90
PETITIONER: Jill and.Iry Eberl
Jackie Nemirow
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 609 Noah Terrace
607 Noah Terrace
PUBLICATION DATE: July 10, 1990
REQUEST: Variation from Section
14.1102.0 to allow a 15' rear
yard instead of the required
25' rear yard to accommodate
a room addition.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Michaels Skowron
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Frank Senise, Tony Avalone
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the
petitioners are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0
to allow a 15' rear yard instead of the required 25' rear
yard to accommodate a room addition.
Mr. Gary Peterson, representing the homeowners as the general
contractor for the job, presented the case stating that both
homes are identical except built opposite of each other.
Mr. Peterson continued by stating that the petitioners
had intended to put on room additions when the house was
first constructed. They then submitted for a building permit
and were informed that only a 151 rear yard was required for
a room addition. Mr. Peterson was then contacted by the
Village stating that for a room addition a 251 rear yard is
required and they would have to get a variance for a 15' rear
yard. Chairman Basnik asked what are the room additions
intended for. Mr. Peterson stated that the room additions are
for privacy because the homes now have windows in the rear of
the buildings and can see their neighbors directly behind
them.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
the need for a variance was caught in the permit review
ZBA-62-V-90
ZBA-63-V-90
July 26, 1990
Page 2 of 2
process. Mr. Clements continued by stating that these lot are
near the maximum impervious surface of 45% and there may be a
concern with drainage. He also noted that there are no
additions on the rear of any homes on this block.
Frank Senise, 608 St. Cecilia, stated that the lots in the
area are all at the maximum impervious surface. Mr. Senise is
also concerned with the drainage and feels he will get all
the water because he is directly behind the residences. Mr.
Senise also stated that if they put on an addition everyone
else will start building additions.
Tony and Amy Avalone, 606 St. Cecilia, stated h ' e is also
concerned with the drainage and would like to know what kind
of addition such as brick or aluminum are they going to
construct.
Mr. Peterson stated that the homes would match the original
construction of the building and presented letters from the
next door neighbors of each petitioner stating they did not
object to the room additions. Mr. Peterson also presented the
Board with pictures of Mr. Senise and Mr. Avalone's homes
from the petitioners views from their rear windows.
The Board then generally discussed the cases. Chairman Basnik
questioned the hardship of the cases. Mr. Brettrager felt if
the additions would blend in with the rest of the house it
would be okay. Chairman Basnik and Mr. Brettrager have
reservations regarding the 25" rear yard.
Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for a 15" rear yard to construct a room
addition with the condition that the drainage be reviewed and
approved by the Village Engineer , no additional structures
on the property, and the additions match the existing
structures.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Pratt seconded.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 4-0.
These Cases must Still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN n
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-63.V-90, JACKIE NEMIROW
LOCATION: 607 NOAH TERRACE
DATE: JULY 19, 1990
The applicant is requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.0 to permit a 15 foot rear yard
to accommodate a proposed room addition. The Code requires a 25 foot rear yard setback.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
Engineering and Inspection Services request that grading plans showing existing and
proposed conditions be submitted with the building plans. No fill shall be placed which
would alter existing drainage patterns.
PLANNING A" ZQNING CQNjMENTS
Ms. Nemirow hopes to construct a 13' X 20' room addition on the back of her home at 607
Noah Terrace. Staff notes that this property, like many in the block, has a shallow (281) rear
yard due to the location of the house on the lot. This severely limits opportunities to
construct additions, decks, or other structures in the rear yard without seeking a rear yard
variance. Staff also notes that the minimum 25 foot rear yard for primary structures has
been maintained by other properties in the block.
The room addition will be placed in the same location as the existing concrete patio. It will
not be any larger. Subsequently, the addition should not result in an increase of run-off.
Downspouts could direct run-off to the sideyard rather than the rear yard which slopes
toward the neighbor's lot.
The applicant should be aware that lot coverage is at 43.5%. The maximum allowed is 45%.
Consequently the area available for outdoor patio space is very limited.
Page 2
ZBA-63-V-90
July 19, 1990
The contractor for the applicant picked -up a general hand-out for decks, patios and room
additions. This hand-out erroneously stated that a room addition could be built at a 15 foot
setback. Room additions, of course, have to meet the same 25 foot setback as the house.
Upon review of the building plans, staff noted that the proposed room addition did not meet
the rear yard requirement of 25 feet, and advised the contractor that the variation was
necessary. Staff acknowledges- the applicant's frustration in designing the room addition to
meet the guidelines of the hand-out. However, inasmuch as the room addition encroaches
into the rear yard, the variation is necessary. It should be noted that the information in the
hand-out has been corrected.
The proposed room addition is near the center of the house, and is only 20 feet in length.
It does not run along the entire length of the house. Accordingly, there are adequate
setbacks from adjoining properties. With the location of the house on the lot built at a
minimum rear yard, there could be no room addition without a variation. Accordingly, a
small addition such as this, proposal, the same size of the patio, may be appropriate, if there
are no justifiable objections from adjoining property owners.
WAM
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT- ZBA-65-V-90, JOSEPH SWIDERSKI.
LOCATION: 1307 EAST ARDYCE LANE
DATE: JULY 30, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Joseph Swiderski. The application affects the property at 1307
Ardyce Lane and was filed to permit the following variation:
Section 14.102.B.1 to allow a 5 foot separation between an existing deck and a
proposed family room addition rather than the 10 feet required.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of July 26, 1990. At the meeting,
John Green, Architect representing the petitioner, presented evidence in support of the
request. He explained that the Swiderski's regularly held family dinners and meetings
attended by several people. Their existing home does not adequately accommodate these
gatherings. The proposed addition would provide a "great room" large enough to
accommodate the family's needs, Mr. Green indicated that 10 neighboring households
submitted letters in support of the request.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, acknowledging the neighbors' consent.
Some concerns were expressed about the amount of lot coverage. It was noted that the
deck is slatted, and water can percolate through the gravel and soil base beneath the deck.
Accordingly, by a 4.0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends, approval of the
request to allow a 5 foot separation between the existing deck and the proposed addition
at. 1307 East Ardyce Lane with the following condition:
- No other structures shall be built on this lot.
Also, by a 4-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals gave final approval of the request to allow
53% lot coverage and a Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) of 0.42 at 1307 East Ardyce Lane.
DMC:hg
" r ------GREAT ROOM WFTH 0
o 3m
ROOM LICISTING
STING
EXIFTINr
KIMHEN
7CA.RAGE LMNG ROOM
-PROPO-SEa NEK -FIRST FLOOR PLAN ;-n
675 SO FT ADDITION
MR & MRS JOSEPH SWIDERSKT
PROPOSED ADDITION
1307 E. ARDYCE LANE -?A4-
frr� SYSTEMS DESIGN GROUP, LTD.
-
I
IE
s
h1 °red
rfarrtf, yr JVKYC(
Lot n C•llero L CatSno'e St, gaily's Rseobdi .on, being in the east 1/2 or Me fest 1/2 c
1/4 .1 Ilectlon 33, ToensnlP 42 Rurth, Range 11, Sit or the 3rd Principal Ysrld i►n, In Coot Co,
4RDYC£ Z14NE
aawN[=N wTM • YCI,Y[MR La1W 1[1tCONOW`,N[1Na N•ee`WO�Ne,leMaeeOW TT �aWYN[�
e
e1VNeeai ANa b +IM''Ya W itlelFa PeN •II'/ eNaeM ® w Ye''..", eYewee,ae.
mreNawNe •w[ wor •o a •wurW nror ee•,.ue[ Sfafo of RRnaia St." of Nth"
Ceunfy of Cock C—ov sf Cash
O.dar Nw 70/.794 We, CERTIRM SURVEY CO. N hwakr teefty *o sa how
_fe.r baafad she building as 0. abew o,w«fr. COMM SURVET co y
hhee .b.se ieeefbed
ee.•. Mn.i ioen _ down is a aameaf reaeew o oken of aew a
E
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 65-V-90
Hearing Date: July 26, 1990
PETITIONER:
Joseph Swiderski
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
1307 E. Ardyce Lane
PUBLICATION DATE:
July 10, 1990
REQUEST:
Variation from Section
14.102.8.1 to allow a 5'
separation between an
existing deck and a proposed
building addition rather than
the 10' required. Section
14.1102.E to permit 53% lot
coverage rather than 45%
allowed by Code. Section
14.1103 to permit FAR of 0.42,
rather than 0.35 allowed by
Code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Richard Pratt
Ronald Cassidy
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Lois Brothers
Michaels Skowron
None
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner
is requesting a variance from Section 14.102.B.1 to allow 5'
separation between an existing deck and proposed building
addition rather than the 101 required. Section 14.1102.E to
permit 53% lot coverage rather than 45% allowed by Code.
Section 14.1103 to permit a FAR of 0.42 rather than 0.35
allowed by Code.
John Green, representing the petitioner, stated that the
Swiderski family has been in the area for 16 years and would
like to stay in the area. Mr. Green continued by stating that
the Swiderski family is very large and consists of 8 brothers
and four misters and the main intention for the room addition
is for family gatherings which occur on a daily basis not
just on holidays. Mr. Green the showed the Board pictures of
surrounding houses which are fairly large homes and this home
is large but would blend in with the neighbors.
ZBA-65-V-90
July 26, 1990
Page 2 of 2
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
there is a large freestanding deck on the property and brings
this near the lot co ' verage requirement. Mr. Clements stated
that the deck could be reduced in size, or the room addition
shortened to reduce 'variations.
Mr. Pratt asked if this is one continuous dining and kitchen
area. Mr. Green Stated ,,that the main part of the part of the
addition is the kitchen and dining room.
Chairman Basnik ' then entertained a motion to grant the
petitioners request for the variance,, with a condition of no
other structure on the property.
Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr. Brettrager moved.
UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Pratt, Cassidy, Brettrager, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 4-0.
This Case must still be heard before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNII-, CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT- ZBA-65-V-90, JOSEPH SWIDERSKI
LOCATION. 1307 EAST ARDYCE LANE
DATE: JULY 19, 1990
The applicant is requesting variances from the following Sections of the Zoning Ordinance:
1. Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a 5 foot separation between an existing deck and a
proposed family room addition. Mount Prospect Ordinance requires a 10 foot
separation.
2. Section 14.1102.13 to permit 53% lot coverage. Mount Prospect Ordinance allows
a maximum of 45% total lot coverage.
3. Section 14.1103 to permit a floor area ratio (F.A.R.) of 0.42. Mount Prospect
Ordinance allows a maximum, F.A.R. OF 0.35.
The applicant is seeking these variances to accommodate a proposed 15'X 51'-111/2"(780
sq.ft.) room addition.
39IMAGE STAEE COMMENTS
Engineering and Inspection Services request that grading plans be submitted which show
existing and proposed conditions. No fill shall be placed which will alter existing drainage
patterns. In addition, downspouts must conform to the downspout regulations.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMNTS
Mr. Swiderski is proposing to construct a room addition along the entire length of the back
of his house at 1307 Ardyce Lane. Currently, the lot is covered by 48.5% impervious surface
and exceeds Ordinance requirements. The proposed addition will account for an additional
4.5% coverage or 53%. The excessive amount of existing lot coverage is due to the large
size (approximately 27' X 281) of the existing freestanding deck. Staff notes that no other
lots in the immediate vicinity have as much lot coverage.
Page 2
ZBA-65-V-90
July 19, 1990
The proposed addition "tends to 5 feet from the existing deck. Staff questions the resulting
relationship between the deck and the room addition. The 5 foot space between the deck
and the addition will create a long and narrow "left over" space that could be visually
awkward. In addition, steps accessing the deck currently project 3'-4' toward the house. If
the steps remain in their current position, only l'-2' will remain between the deck and the
addition.
The applicant has gathered letters from 15 neighbors (representing 10 households) stating
that they don't object to the proposal. These households are shown on the attached map.
Staff notes that the lot coverage variation and F.A.R. variation point to the fact that this lot
is over -built. Individually, these variations are not substantial, but their combined effect
contribute to this being a more significant request.
It is recommended that the petitioner fully explain the necessity of the room addition, and
why a smaller size would not be workable. One other alternative is to reduce the size of
the large 27' X 28' deck, to allow more open space.
All appropriate standards for variations should be examined with this request Staff
questions the hardship with this application, and believes there may be other alternatives
that do not require these combined variations.
DMC:hg
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING AN ADVISORY REFERENDUM
FOR THE SUBMISSION OF A PUBLIC QUESTION ON THE
BALLOT FOR THE NOVEMBER 6, 1990 ELECTION
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That pursuant to the authority vested in the
President and Board of Trustees of the ' Village of Mount Prospect
by Article.VII of the Constitution of the State of Illinois, 1970,
an advisory referendum shall be held in the Village of Mount
Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, during the general election to be
held November 6, 1990, for the purpose of submitting to the voters
the following proposition:
Shall the Corporate Authorities of the Village of Mount
Prospect authorize the construction of a new Public Safety
Building to be located at 112 East Northwest Highway at a
cost of $6,992,000.00. it
SECTION TWO: "That the local election official shall certify the
above public question to the election authority having jurisdiction
over the territory of the village of Mount Prospect in the manner
provided by law.
SECTION THREE: That Notice of said election shall be published and
the form of the ballot shall be prepared in the form and manner
provided by law.
SECTION FOUR: That said advisory referendum regarding said public
question and all matters pertaining thereto shall be conducted in
the manner prescribed by statute for and during the aforesaid
general election.
SECTION ,FIVE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
NWCDS
Northwest Central Dispatch system
MUNICIPAL BUILDING 133 SOUTH ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD/ ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS 600051(708) 398-1130 FAX(708)396-2498
EMERGENCY POLICE & FIRE DISPATCH SERVING -ARLINGTON HEIGHTS -BUFFALO GROVE -ELK GROVE VILLAGE -MOUNT PROSPECT -PROSPECT HEIGHTS
DATE: July 13, 1990
TO: NWCDS Board Q of-aDirectors
-
FROM: Doug Edmond?, Executive Director
RE: New Joint Venture Agreement for Inclusion of Palatine
in NWCDS
Attached is a copy of the authorizing resolution to provide
for the signing of a new venture agreement to include Palatine
as a member of NWCDS.
The Palatine Village Board approved the venture agreement at its
meeting on July 9th.
Material supporting the membership request was sent to you last
March and each of you has already briefed your Boards. However,
if you need anything further in support of Palatine's membership
please let me know.
It would be helpful if you could advise when this matter will be
considered by your Board. With that information, I might be
able to better coordinate circulating the seven copies of the
venture agreement which need original signatures of the President
and Clerk.
/CAF
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ENTRY INTO AN AMENDED AGREEMENT
FOR THE NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYSTE
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect previously authorized entry by said Village into an
Agreement to provide for and maintain a Central Emergency Dispatch
operation known as Northwest Central Dispatch System, hereinafter
referred to as "NWCDS"; and
WHEREAS, NWCDS has proven successful in providing emergency
communication services to the Mount Prospect Fire and Police
Departments; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Palatine has made application for
membership in NWCDS; and
WHEREAS, the NWCDS Board of Directors has unanimously recommended
approval of the Village of Palatine membership request; and
WHEREAS, it is believed that the inclusion of an additional
community in the system will prove beneficial to both the System
and the Village; and
WHEREAS, the addition of an new member to the System requires
approval of an amended Venture Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That pursuant to Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970
Constitution of the State of Illinois and the Intergovernmental
Cooperation Act, Chapter 127, Paragraphs 741 through 749 of the
Illinois Revised Statutes, that the Mayor of the Village of Mount
Prospect is authorized to enter into an amended Agreement for
Northwest Central Dispatch System which provides for the addition
of the Village of Palatine to NWCDS, a copy of said amended
Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Mayor
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
N
an I Rep I NCT
K
M
M�
0
0>
'99 r -
F I RE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL -4.1-1 SYSTEM
MUNICIPAL BUILDING / 33 SOUTH ARLINGTON HEIGHTS ROAD
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS, ILLINOIS 60005 708-398-1130
FAX 708-398-2498
SERVING ARLINGTON HEIGHTS/ BUFFALO GROVE/ ELK GROVE VILLAGE I MT. PROSPECT/ PROSPECT HEIGHTS
DATE: July 13, 1990
TO: Village Managers
FROM: Doug Edmonds, Executive Director
RE: Membership of Palatine and Prospect Heights in the
Northwest Central 9-1-1 System
Both Palatine and Prospect Heights have passed ordinances
which provide for membership in the Northwest Central 9-1-1
System. The Prospect Heights ordinance also provided for a
9-1-1 surcharge referendum which was successfully held on
March 20th. Palatine had previously passed a surcharge
referendum.
The process for membership approval is somewhat different for
the 9-1-1 System than for Northwest Central Dispatch. The
existing 9-1-1 Joint Venture Agreement provides that a
resolution authorizing the Village President to sign an
"Addendum of New Membership" is all that is needed.
Such a resolution along with the addendum form is enclosed for
for consideration by the Village Board of Trustees. A single
resolution and a single addendum is being used for both of
the municipalities.
If you need any supporting background information concerning
membership of either of these two communities, please let me
know.
/CAF
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN ADDENDUM OF MEMBERSHIP
IN THE ENHANCED 9-1-1 SYSTEM TO INCLUDE
THE CITY OF PROSPECT HEIGHTS AND VILLAGE OF PALATINE
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect previously authorized entry by said Village into an
AGreement to provide for and maintain a joint Enhanced 9-1-1 System
known as Northwest Central 9-1-1 System hereinafter referred to as
"the 9-1-1 system"; and
WHEREAS, the City of Prospect Heights and the Village of Palatine
have made application for membership in the 9-1-1 System; and
WHEREAS, the 9-1-1 System Board of Directors has unanimously
recommended approval of the City of Prospect Heights and the
Village of Palatine membership requests; and
WHEREAS, it is believed that the inclusion of additional
communities in the 9-1-1 System will prove beneficial to both the
9-1-1 system and the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, each new member has agreed to:
1. Provide funds for its proportionate share of the cost of
operation of the 9-1-1 System; and
2. Provide all necessary funds required to add or modify hardware
and/or software in order to accommodate the operational needs
of the new member, and to pay a proportionate share of normal
9-1-1 operations expenses; and
3. Pay a proportionate share of debts and liabilities existing
at the time 9-1-1 service begins; and
WHEREAS, the addition of new members to the 9-1-1 System requires
approval of an Addendum of New Membership.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect, pursuant to the Intergovernmental Cooperation
Act, Chapter 127, Paragraphs 741 through 749 and the Emergency
Telephone System Act, Chapter 134, Section 30.01 et seg., of the
Illinois Revised Statutes, that the Mayor of the Village of Mount
Prospect is authorized to enter into an Addendum of New Membership
which provides for the addition of the City of Prospect Heights and
the Village of Palatine to the 9-1-1 System, a copy of said
Addendum is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as
Exhibit "A".
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley, Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk /�
1990.
NORTHWEST CENTRAL 9-1-1 SYSTEM
ADDENDUM OF NEW MEMBERSHIP
WHEREAS, the Villages of Arlington Heights, Buffalo Grove,
Elk Grove Village and Mount Prospect have previously formed
a joint venture to install, operate and maintain an Enhanced
9-1-1 Emergency Telephone System known as Northwest Central
9-1-1 System (the 9-1-1 System), pursuant to authority
granted under terms of the Intergovernmental Cooperation
Act, Chapter 127, Paragraph 741 through 749 and the
Emergency Telephone System Act, Chapter 134, section 30.01
et seq of the Illinois Revised Statutes, and
WHEREAS, the City of Prospect Heights and the Village of
Palatine have made application for membership in the 9-1-1
System; and
WHEREAS, it is believed that the inclusion of additional
communities in the 9-1-1 System will prove beneficial to
both the 9-1-1 System and the Village; and
WHEREAS, each new member has agreed to:
1. provided funds for its proportionate share of the
costs of operation of the 9-1-1 system; and
2. provide all necessary funds required to add or
modify hardware and/or software in order to
accommodate the operational needs of the new
member, and to pay a proportionate share of normal
9-1-1 operating expenses; and
3. pay a proportionate share of existing debts and
liabilites existing at the time 9-1-1 service
begins.
IT IS NOW THEREFORE AGREED to accept the City of Prospect
Heights and the Village of Palatine as full participating
members of the Northwest Central 9-1-1 System, effective
upon the approval.of all current members.
Dated this day of
Village President
rvwQ**1W
Date:
1990
Village of lount Prospect �w .
"Mount Orospect, Illinois
"mow
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO:
MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY
FROM:
EVERET TE M. HILL, JR., ESQ.
DATE:
JULY 25, 1990
SUBJECT:
REQUIREMENT OF A MAJORITY VOTE
It is my understanding that a question has arisen with respect to a vote at a recent
regular Mount Prospect Board meeting.
An item was on the Agenda concerning approval of an Amendment to a Special Use.
This Amendment had received the approval of the Zoning Board of Appeals.
Four of the six Trustees and the Mayor were in attendance at the meeting. A Motion
was made to approve the Amendment. Three Trustees voted in favor of the Motion and
one voted against it. The Mayor then voted against the Amendment, resulting in a 3-
2 Vote in its favor. However, the Mayor declared that the Motion failed because it did
not receive the affirmative approval of the majority of the President and Board of
Trustees then holding office. This ruling was based on Section 2.201(C), Chapter 11 of
the Village Code which reads, "For purposes of this Subsection, a majority shall be more
than one-half of the President and Board of Trustees then holding office." Since seven
persons held office at the time, more than one half would have been at least 4 votes.
It is my opinion that the Mayor's ruling was a caveat' based on the intent of this Section
of the Village Code.
However, in my review of this Code Section, it appeared to me that an error was made
in the format of Article Il of Chapter 2.
I am recommending that Subsection C-1 as stated above be removed from Subsection
C, "Declaration of Vote" because the word "majority" does not appear in that Subsection.
A new subparagraph B-4 would be created which would read as follows:
"For purposes of this Article H, a majority shall be more than one-half (1/2) of
the President and Board of Trustees then holding office."
I am enclosing a copy of the current Section 2.201 -and a proposed Ordinance amending
it.
EVERETTE M. HILI, JR., ESQ.
EMH/rcw
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE II OF CHAPTER 2
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 2.201.B entitled "Conduct of Business"
of Chapter 2 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by adding a sub -paragraph 4; so that
hereinafter said Section 2.201.B shall be and read as follows:
it 4. For purposes of the Article II, a majority shall be more
than one-half (1/2) of the President and Board of
Trustees then holding office. 11
SECTION TWO: That Section 2.201.0 entitled "Conduct of Business
of Chapter 2 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said
paragraph C of Section 2.201 shall be and read as follows:
of C. When a Board Member is Not Required to Vote.
1. As a general rule, no member of the Board of
Trustees or the President shall vote on a question
in which he has a direct, personal, or pecuniary
interest. In such case, the office of such person
casting such "present" or "pass" vote shall be
deemed vacant.
2. while it is the duty of every member of the
President and Board of Trustees who has an opinion
on any question in which he has no direct, personal
or pecuniary interest, to express it by his vote,
such member cannot be compelled to do so.
a. . Such member may prefer to abstain from voting.
b. In such instances, a vote "present" or "pass"
shall be considered a vote on the prevailing
side upon announcing the adoption or rejection
or a motion on the floor. 11
SECTION THREE: That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
JB/CAF
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF
NORTHERN COOK COUNTY TRANSFER STATION.DEVELOPMENT
DOCKET NOS. 5322 AND 5423
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect recognizes that solid waste
disposal is entering into a crisis situation; and
WHEREAS, the solid waste problem has been significantly heightened
with no major relief forthcoming; and
WHEREAS, the solid waste disposal crisis impacts local governments
and their residents and comprehensive solutions to this regional
problem must come from cooperation between local governments; and
WHEREAS, the member communities of the Solid Waste Agency of
Northern Cook County have developed comprehensive solutions which
include the largest recycling effort in the State of Illinois and
calls for the development of a Balefill in unincorporated Hanover
Township; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has been an active and
longstanding participant in the efforts of the Solid Waste Agency
of Northern Cook County and its predecessor, the Northwest
Municipal Conference, to alleviate the solid waste crisis; and
WHEREAS, the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County has
submitted a report to the Cook County Zoning Board of Appeals
requesting a 49 acre parcel northeast of the intersection of Des
Plaines/River Road and Central Road in unincorporated Wheeling
Township for be rezoned the purpose of developing a transfer
station, administration building and flood control project, being
the subject of Docket Nos. 5322 and 5423; and
WHEREAS, the development of this transfer station is a critical
element in the plan to address the solid waste crisis for over
750,000 Cook County residents; and
WHEREAS, the Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County has once
again shown its commitment to investing in the region by including
two flood control reservoirs at the proposed transfer station,
although this is not a requirement of the project; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect strongly supports the
transfer station, administration building and flood control project
as proposed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect urges the Cook
County Zoning Board of Appeals to approve the request to rezone the
parcel being the proposed location of the transfer station complex,
being the subject of Docket Nos. 5322 and 5423, for property
generally located at Des Plaines/River Road and Central Road in
Wheeling township.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk of the Village of mount
Prospect is hereby instructed to certify and forward a copy of this
Resolution to the Chairman of the Cook County Zoning Board of
Appeals for inclusion
I
Resolution
Docket Nos. 5322 and 5423
Page 2 of 2
in the public record of said Cook County Zoning Board of Appeals.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of August, 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEICT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JULY 19, 1990
SUBJECT: BUSSE ROAD INDUSTRIAL PARK RESUBDIVISION
2200-2220 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
PLAT OF SUBDIVISION
The above mentioned resubdivision is being sought to replace a condominium plat approved
by the Village in 1986. The new resubdivision will create six lots of record, as well as three
outlots. The site is zoned I-1 and received approval for change in Comprehensive Plan to
General Industrial in 1986. The site is bordered to the south by a vacant triangular parcel,
to the west by the Northwest Tollway, to the north by the Pharaoh Apartments, and to the
east a Shell Service Station and the Addison Building Material Company. Already on the
site and on Lot 1 is J & L Industry Supply Company.
In February of this year, the owner, Rosenow Investment Properties, appeared before the
Zoning Board of Appeals to request a Special Use in the nature of a Planned Unit
Development seeking to waive the requirements that the development be under common
ownership, to waive the required perimeter yard setbacks, and the approval of a unified
signage plan. The Village Board heard these requests on May 1, 1990. The action taken
by the Village Board on these items can be found in Ordinance # 4180.
The Plan Commission heard the applicant's request for approval of the Busse Road
Industrial Park Resubdivision on Wednesday, July 18, 1990, and recommended that it be
approved by a vote of 6-0. Staff had no objections to the plat.
DMC:hg
BUSSE ROAD IHDUSTRIAL PARK
I
CAF/
10) *110 olk P.1 z1a) An 661
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN
PERSONAL PROPERTY
OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corporate
authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect," Cook County,
Illinois, it is no longer necessary, useful, or in the best
interest of the Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of
a 1975 Fire Department Pierce International Pumper; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the President and Board of
Trustees of the village of Mount Prospect that the best interests
of the Village would be served by the sale of the personal property
being the subject of this ordinance to the highest bidder.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 11-76-
4 of Chapter 24 of the Illinois Revised Statutes, the corporate
authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect find that the items
of personal property being the subject of this Ordinance owned by
the Village of Mount Prospect are no longer useful or necessary and
the best interests of the Village will be served by its sale.
SECTION TWO: That the Village Clerk of the Village of Mount
Prospect be and is hereby directed to cause a public notice
advertising for bids for such personal property to be published in
the Mount Prospect Herald, which notices shall be in substantially
the same form as indicated on Exhibit A attached hereto and hereto
made a part hereof.
SECTION THREE: Bids received in response to said Notice shall be
opened in the Office of the Village Manager, 100 South Emerson
Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056, at the hour of 10:00 A.M.
on September 10, 1990.
SECTION FOUR: Within ten (10) days after the successful bids are
accepted, the successful bidders shall tender to the Village of
Mount Prospect the consideration specified in the bid accepted and
upon receipt of such consideration, the Village Manager is hereby
authorized to transfer title of said personal property to the
successful bidders.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
1990.
Gerald L. Farley, Village President
Carol A. Fields, Village Clerk
NOTICE TO BIDDERS
FOR SALE
FIRE DEPARTMENT PUMPER
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Village of Mount Prospect
will accept bids at the Office of the Village Manager,
100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
until 10:00 A.M. on September 10, 1990 for One 1975
Pierce International Pumper (known as.Unit 518), Serial
Number 6AO314109, purchased by the Village on February
26, 1975. Interested parties should contact Capt. Steve
Dumovich at 392-6000 Ext. 385 during regular business
hours, for an appointment to inspect this vehicle.
This vehicle is being offered for sale in an "as is"
condition with a minimum bid amount of Five Thousand
Dollars. The Village of Mount Prospect offers no
warranty, express or implied, on the condition or
serviceability of this equipment. The bidder assumes
full responsibility for the equipment upon taking
possession.
The highest qualified bid will be deemed the successful
bidder. The Village reserves the right to reject any and
all bids as well as to waive any technical errors in
individual bids.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
I
Village of tl cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: August 1,*1940
SUBJECT: Illinois 83 Water Main - Golf Rd. to Lonnquist Blvd.
On August 1, 1990, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for the
Ill. 83 Water Main. At this time, the.sealed bids were publicly
opened and read aloud.
BID FORM
The Bidder was requested to submit unit prices for 35 Bid Items td
complete the replacement of this water main.
Eighteen Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of
eight Contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of
'$248,170.00 by Vincent DiVito, Inc. to high of $348,350.00 by
Szabo Paving & Construction. The Engineer's Estimate for the
project was $288,350.00.
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 10% of their total
bid as required by the Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly
signed their bids and bid bonds. The lowest bid was 14% below the
estimate.
BIDDER'S NAM
XML BI12
1.)
Vincent DiVito, Inc.
$248,170.00
2.)
Abbott Contractors
$277,261.00
3.)
Genesis Construction
$286,396-00
4.)
John Rendina Construction
$290,555.00
5.)
Vian construction
$298,245.00
6.)
Mola Construction
$325,905.00
7.)
Lenny Hoffman Excavating
$346,219,50
8.)
Szabo Paving
$348,350.00
Page 2
Recommendation -1990
QUALIFICATIONS OF LOW DIP=
The low bidder is Vincent DiVito, Inc. Bloomingdale, Ill. This
company has bid previously on various Village projects. This
contractor is well known in the northwest suburbs.
BECOMMENDATIO11
Therefore, the Engineering Division recommends awarding a Contract
to Vincent DiVito, Inc. with a Bid price of $248,170.00.
Funding for this project is shown on Page 186 of this year's budget
under Account Code No.41-072-10-8730.
Robert Pszanka
I concur with the above recommendation
Charles Bencic,
Director of Inspection Services
I concur with the above recommendation
Herbert L. Weeks,
Director of Public Works
RP: CB/m
Village of Mount Prospect
Illinois Route 83 Watermain Golf Road To Lonmluist Boulevard
Augest 1, 1990
10:00 A.M.
No, Item Quantity
1. 8' D.1. W.M. Clue 56 _....
1750 LF
2. 6' D.I.W.M. Class 52
20 LF
3. 8' Shutdown ".._ . _ution
2 EA
4. 6' Shutdown Connection
2 EA
5. 8' x 8' 1-. Connection
1 EA
6. 8' Gate Valve
4 EA
7. 6' Geta Valve (IaAatled On Exit. Klein)
I EA
S. 60' I.D. Manhole
I EA
9. 48' I.D. Manhole
5 EA
10. Hydrant w1Aux. Valve A Box
5 EA
11. 2' a 2' Copper W.S. Paconuarctim
1 EA
12. V x 1' Copper W.S.
I EA
'.13. V x 314' Capper W.S. RecooDuction
26 EA
'.. 14. 6' P.V.C. San" Service Repair
75 LF
''...... 15. Cub Stop A Box
22 EA
''. 16. Bit. Coon. Surface Romuval
400 SY
17. 10* P.C.C. Nvantoot Remove A Replsoe
500 SY
18. 2' sit. Cane. Surface Course. Class 1
80 TON
19. Granular Trench BactBB CA 6
1000 TON
120. Granular Traach Badmll FA 6
3000 TON
21. Concrete Drive Rmovd
130 BY
22. 6' P.C.C. Drive Replactuacts
150 SY
23. Asphalt Drive Removal
300 SY
24. 2' Ba. Cmc. Drive wM' CA 6 Stow
275 SY
25. 8 6.24 Com. Curb t Gutter Removal A Rep6e
700 LF
26. B 6.12 Cone. Curb A Gutter Removal A Replan
280 LF
27. 5' Comatose WALE Remove A Replace
4000 SF
28. Tropic Cool
I LS
29. Hydrant w/Aux Valve Removal
3 EA
30. Abandon Valve Vault
2 EA
31. Remove Valve Vault
3 EA
32. Abandon Catch Basin
i EA
33. 48' LD. Catch Barin W2' Sump
3 EA
34. Adjust Manhole wlNew Casing
5 EA
35. Sod Reatoretim
1700 SY
GLEN ELLYN.H.
NORTNBROOK,IL
WAUCONDA,IL
LEMONT.H.
ELK GROVE VIL.
Unit
m o&T-
UWE O-
UnEt I otal
UWE
35.00
61250.00
50.00
87500.00
67,00
117250.00
56.20
98350.00
.50.00
87500.00
32,00
640.00
28.00
560.00
60.00
1200.00
75.50
1510.00
53.00
1060.00
1200.00
2400.00
3,000.00
6000.00
1,700.00
3400.00
3.500.00
7000.00
1,400.00
2800.00
1000.00
2000.00
2,500.OD
5000.00
1,450.00
2900.00
3,200.00
6400.00
2,060.00
4120.00
2300.00
2300.00
3,000.00
3000.00
1,610.00
1610.00
2,700.00
2700.00
3,000.00
3000.00
500.00
2000.00
550.00
2200.00
750.00
3000.00
950.00
3800.00
600.00
2400.00
60D.00
600.00
3,000.00
3000.00
1,750.00
1750.00
1,500.00
ISWOO
2,000,00
2000.00
1600.00
1600.00
2.000.00
2000.00
1,700.00
1700.00
1,600.00
1600.00
1.200.00
1200.00
1300.00
6500.00
1,000.00
500000
1.300.00
6500.00
1.200.00
6000.00
1,040.00
5200.00
1500.00
7500.00
2.500.00
12500.00
1.450.00
7230.OD
1.800.00
9000.00
1,600.00
8000.00
600.00
_
600.00
880.00
880.00
890.00
890.00
1.500.00
1500.00
2.033.00
2035.00
250.00
250.00
741.00
741.00
560.00
560.00
750.00
750.00
1.180.00
1t80.00
2DO.00
5200.00
730.00
18980.00
440.OD
11440.00
600.00"
15600.00
750.00
19500.00
241.00
'.8000.00
44.00
3300.00
- 19.00
1423.00
55.00
4125.00
20.00
1500.00
140.00
3080.00
665.00
14630.00
375.00
8250.00
350.00
7700.00
200.00
4400.00
8.00
3200.00
4.00
1600.00
2.00
800.60
5.00
2000.00
4.00
1600.00
40.00
20000.00
30.00
15000.00
27.00
13500.00
40.00
20000.00
60.00
30000.00
40.00
- 3200.00
35.00
2800.00
28.00
2241.00
85.00
6800.00
75.00
6000.00
13.00
13000.00
7.00
7000.00
13.00
13000.00
6.00
6000.00
10.00
10000.00
1 LOD
33000.00
4.30
13500.00
11.00
33000.00
5.00
1500D.00
10.00
30000.00
12.00
1800.00
4.00
600.00
10.00
1500.00
12.50
1475.00
12.00
1800.00
20.00
3000.00
18.00
2700.00
20.00
3000.00
45.00
6750.00
24.00
3600.00
4.00
1200.00
2.00
600.60
2.00
600.00
5.00
1500.00
4.00
1200.00
12.00
3300.00
10.00
2750.00
16.00
4400.00
25.00
6875.00
16.00
4400.00
20.00
14000.00
18.00
12600.00
18.00
12600.00
22.50
15750.00
17.50
12250.00
15.00
4200.00
WOO
3920.00
15.00
4200.00
21.50
6020.00
17.50
4900,00
4.00
16000.00
4.00
16000.00
3.00
12000.00
3.75
15000.00
3.70
14800.00
5,000.00
5000.00
20,000.00
20000.00
4.981.00
4931.00
3,500.00
3500.00
6,000.00
6000.00
800.00
2430.00
635.00
1905.00
200.00
600.00
650.00
1950.00
200.00
600.00
100.00
200.00
450.00
900.00
350.00
300.00
400.00
800.00
200.00
400.00
300.00
300.00
600.00
600.00
250.00
250.00
950.00
950.00
600.00
600.00
100.00
100.00
420.00
420.00
150.00
130.00
300.00
300.00
500.00
5013.00
1,800.00
1800.00
1, 175.00
1175.00
900.00
900.00
1,700.00
1700.00
000.00
1300.00
350.00
1750.00
5000
2800.00
150.00
750.00
350.00
050.00
400.00
2000.00
4.00
6800.00
3.00
5100.00
5.00
8500.00
5.00
8500.00
12.00
20400.00
Told
248170.00
Told
277261.00
ToW
....286396.00
Total
290555.00
7ou1
298245.00
Illinois Route 83 Watermain Golf Road To Lounquist Boulevard
Page 2
No. :tem
Estimated
Quantity
L 8- D i. W.M. C1au 56
1750 LF.
2. 6' D.LW.M. Class 52
20 LF
3. a' Shutdown Connection
2 EA
4. 6' Shutdown Connection
2 EA
5. 3' a a' Pre -re Connection
I EA
6. 6' Gan Valve
4 EA
7. 6' Gate Valva (Inatalled On East. Main)
I EA
8. 60' I.D. Maalmla
I EA
9. 43' I.D. Manhole
5 EA
10. Hydrant w/Aus. Valve & Boa
S EA
It. 2' a 2' Copper W.S. Roconaccom
I EA
12. 1' a I' Copper W.S. Rc _ .ori n
I EA
13. 1' a 314' Copper W.S. Rocoanoetion
26 EA
14. 6- F.Y.C. Sanitary Service Repair
75 LF
15. Curb Stop & Boa
22 EA
16. Bit. Cox. Surface Removal
400 SY
17. 10' P.C.C. Pavemeut Remove & Replace
500 SY
13. Y Bk. Canee, Surface Coarse, Char I
30 TON
19, Granular Trench Backfill CA 6
1000 TON
20, Granular Trench Backllll FA 6
WOO TON
2L Concrete Drive liemovd
ISO BY
_
22. 6- P.C.C. Drive Rept000naact
150 BY
23. Asphalt Drive Rea wd
300 SY
74, 2- Bit. Cox. Drive w/6- CA 6 Stmt
275 SY
25, B 6.24 Cmc. Curb & Gaaler Removal & Rapt"
700 LF
26, B 6.12 Cox. Curb & Gutter•Rsmovd & Replas
280 LF
T7, S' Concrete Walk Remove & Replace
4000 SF
28, Traffic Como
- 1 LS
29. Hydrant w/Aaa Valve Removal
3 EA
36, Abandon Valve Vault
2 EA
31, Remove Valve Vault
I EA
32, Abandon Cuch Bola
t EA
33. 48' I.D. Catch Basin w/2' Sump
I EA
34. Adjust Manhole w/New Casting
5 EA
35. Sod Reuoratlon
1700 SY
MOLA CONST.CO.
L.HOFFMAN EXCA
SZABO PAVING
ENGINEERS
OAKBROOK,IL
WILMETTE, IL
ELMHURST,IL
ESTIMATE
Unit Total
Unit Total
Uni[ Total
Unit Total
nit Total
_ WOO
87500.00
52.85
92487.50
45.60
79800.00
40.00
70000.00
42.00
$40.00
42.35
847.00
100.00
2000.00
-
30.00
600.00
1200.00
2400.00
2.500.00
5000.00
2.300.00
4600.00
1,000.00
2000.00
1000.00
2000.00
2,500.00
5000.00
1,300.00
3600.00
1,000.00
2000.00
2400.00
2400.00
5370.00
5170.00
3,000.00
3000.00
1,500.00
1500.00
600.00
2400.00
1.100.00
4400.00
750.00
3000.00
300.00
3200.00
1800.00
1800.00
1,445.00
1445.00
.650.00
650.00
1,000.00
1000.00
1600,00
1600.00
765.00
765.00
2.000.00
2000.00
1,250.00
1250.00
1200.00
6000.00
530.00
2650.00
1,800.00
9000.00
1,000.00
5000.00
2000.00
IOD00.00
2,395.00
11975.00
11900.00
9500.00
1,500.00
7560.00
1000.00
1000.00
2,165.00
2165.00
1,506.00
1500.00
800.00
800.00
450.00
450.00
1,950.00
1950.00
425.00
425.00
600.00
600.00
400.00
- 10400.00
1,720.00
44720.00
760.00
19760.00
600.00
15600.00
30.00
2250.00
24.10
1307.50
25.00
1875.00
20.00
1500.00
300.00
6600.00
350.00
7700.00
450.00
9900.00
200.00
4400.00
5.00
2000.00
6.25
2500.00
4.00
1600.00
5.00
2000.00
55.00
27500.00
56.05
28025.00
68.00
34000.00
60.00
30000.00
100.00
8000.00
100.00
3000.00
50.00
4000.00
30.00
_
6400.00
14.00
14000.00
12.80
12800.00
20.00
20000.00
12.00
12000.00
12.00
36000.00
11.10
33300.00
19.00
57000.00
12.00
36000.00
5.06
750.00
10.00
1500.00
20.00
3000.00
4.00
600.00
45.00
6750.00
28.40
4260.00
27.00
4050.00
50.00
7500.00
5.00
1500.00
7.00
2100.00
12.00
3600.00
3.00
900.00
25.00
6875.00
21.70
5967.50
22.00
6050.00
40.00
1IO00.00
24.00
16800.00
13.55
12985.00
20.00
14000.00
25.00
17500.00
18.00
5040.00
16.00
4480.00
18.00
5040.00
20.00
5600.00
4.00
16000.00
3.40
13600.06
4.00
16000.00
4.00
t6000.00
25,000.00
25000.00
16,165.00
16165.00
10,000.00
10060.00
10,000.00
10000.00
400.00
1200.00
400.00
1200.00
1,000.00
3000.00
300.00
900.00
.200.00
400.00
175.00
350.00
375.00
750.00
200.00
400.00
250.00
250.00
235.00
235.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
500.00
200.00
200.00
175.00
175.00
500.00
500.00
400.00
400.00
1,500.00
1500.00
1,020.00
1020.00
1,500.00
1500.00
1,500.00
1500.00
300.00
1500.00
195.00
975.00
250,00
125,.00
400.00
2000.00
10.00
17000.00
5.00
8500.00
T.OD
11900-001
1
6.00
10206.00
Total 325905.001
Taal 346219.50
Told 348350.00.
Tont__....__
Taal 288350.00:
Village of U—cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: August 1, 1990
SUBJECT: RECOMMENDAT20N - Prospect Avenue Reconstruction
On August 1st, 1990, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received for
the Prospect Ave. Reconstruction - Edward St. to Mt. Prospect Rd.
At this time, the sealed bids were publicly opened and read aloud.
BID FORM
The Bidder was requested to submit unit prices for 23 Bid Items to
complete the reconstruction and widening of this section of
Prospect Ave.
DS
Eight Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of five
Contractors submitted bids. The bids range from a low of
$394,770.80 by Lenny Hoffman Excavating Co. to high of $440,060.00
by Vincent DiVito, Inc. The Engineer's Estimate for the project
was $406,605.00.
ANALYSIS OF ;BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 10% of their total
bid as required by the Contract Documents. All Bidders correctly
signed their bids and bid bonds. The lowest bid was 2.9% below
the estimate.
BIDDER'S NAME T ==_BID
1.) Lenny Hoffman Excavating $394,770.80
2.) Plote, Inc. $395,512.50
3.) Arrow Road Construction $400,180.25
4.) Triggi Construction Co. $434,779.00
5.) Vincent DiVito, Inc. $440,060.00
Page 2
Recommendation -1990
The low bidder is Lenny Hoffman Excavating, Inc. This contractor
is presently working for the Village on the Schoenbeck Rd. project.
This contractor has sufficient resources to complete both projects.
RECQMKENDATION
Therefore, the Engineering Division recommends awarding a Contract
to Lenny Hoffman Excavating, Inc. with a Bid price of $394,770.80..
Funding for this project is shown on Page 152 of this year's budget
under Account Code No. 01-071-04-8501.
Robert Pszanka
I concur with the above recommendation
Charles Bencic,
Director of Inspection Services
I concur with the above recommendation
Herbert L. Weeks,
Director Of Public Works
RP/m
Village of Mount Prospect
Prospect Avenue Reconstruction
August 1, 190
10:00 A.M.
No. Item
Estimated
{quantity
1. Special Excavation
7670 CY
2. Sub -Base Granular Material Type B
2420 CY
3. Aggregate Base Course Type B
5325 Ton
4. Bituminous Material Prime Coat MC -30
1550 Gal
5. Bit. Conc. Binder Crse Class I, Type 1, Mix B
830 Toa
6. Bit. Conc. Surface Crse Class 1, Type 1, Mix D
790 Ton
7. Combination Concrete Curb & Gutter Type B 6.12
3350 LF
L Concrete Curb Type B
65 LF
9. Concrete Curb & Gutter Removal
315 LF
10, Storm Sewers, Rubber Gasket Ty 1 12'
690 LF
11. Storm Sewers, Rubber Gasket Ty 1 15'
190 LF
12. Storm Sewers, Rubber Gasket Ty 1 18'
190 LF
13. Pipe Drains, Perforated, PVC 6'
1435 LF
14. Trench Backfill
1660 Toa
15. Porous Granular Backfill
425 Ton
16. Inlot Type A wiry I Frame, Open Lid
9 Ea
17. Catch Basin Type A wiry 1 Frame, Closed Cid
7 Ea
18. Driveway Pavement Removal
140 SY
19. PCC Driveway Pavement 6'
S0 SY
20. Asphalt Driveway Pavement 3'
90 SY
21. PCC Sidewalk Removal & Replacement 5'
380 SF
22. Parkway Restoration
4590 SY
23. Traffic And Dust Control
1 L.S.
LENNY HOFFMAN
PLOTE,WC.
ARROW ROAD
TRIGGI CONST,
VINCENT DIVITO
ET
WILMTE,IL
ELGIN, IL
MT.PQOSPECT,IL
W.CHICAGO,IL
GLEN ELLYN, "1L
Unit Total
Unit oto
Unit otai
mt otal
nit otaI
11.90
91273.00
10.65
81685.50
10.50
80535.00
16.00
122720.00
10.00
76700.00
5.00
12100.00
26.30
49126.00
20.85
50457.00
15.00
36300.00
26.00
62920.00
11.50
61237.50
12.10
64432.50
12.55
66828.75
12.75
67893.75
10.00
53250.00
1.15
1782.50
1.25
1937.50
0.85
1317.50
1.00
1550.00
2.00
3100.00
22.80
18924.00
24.40
20252.00
25.90
21497.00
28.00
23240.00
40.00
33200.00
28.50
22230.00
Y
30.60
23868.00
27.80
- 21684.00
31.00
24180.00
44.00
34320.00
9.15
30652.50
10.45
35007.50
10.85
36347.50
10.75
36012.50
12.00
40200.00
10.50
682.50
11.00
715.00
11.65
757.25
10.75 •
698.75
10.00
650.00
1.50
472.50
3.30
1039.50
5.90
1858.50
3.50
1102.50
5.00
1575.00
21.50
14835.00
23.50
16215.00
18.65
12868.50
25.00
17250.00
36.00
24840.00
22.50
4275.00
31.90
6061.00
21.15
4018.50
27.00
5130.00
40.00
7600.00
23.50
4465.00
34.10
6479.00
22.90
4351.00
29.00
5510.00
42.00
7980.00
16.88
24222.80
8.90
12771.50
9.60
13776.00
12.00
17220.00
14.00
20090.00
13.00
21580.00
14.30
23738.00
12.10
20086.00
13.00
21586.00
11.00
18260.00
13.00
5525.00
11.00
4675.00
11.35
4823.75
12.50
5312.60
11.00
4675.00
1425.00
12825.00
645.00
5805.00
795.00
7155.00
600.00
5400.00
650.00
5850.00
1725.00
12075.00
1,140.00
7980.00
1,521.00
10647.00
1,200.00
8400.00
1,600.00
11200.00_
2.00
280.00
4.40
616.00
6.50
770.00
9.00
1260.00
10.00
1400.00
24.70
1235.00
28.75
1437.50
23.00
1150.00
27.00
1350.00
30.00
1500.00
19.00
1710.00
22.10
1989.00
27.50
2475.00
27.00
2430.00
10.00
900.00
4.15
1577.00
3.35
1273.00
3.90
1482.00
3.50
1330.00
5.00
1900.00
4.65
21343.50
5.10
23409.00
5.70
26163.00
5.10
23409.00
5.00
22950.00
29,468.00
29468.00
5,000.00
5000.00
9,132.00
9132.00
5,500.00
5500.00
5,000.00
5000.00
Total 394770.80J__Total
395512.50 1
Total40 180.25
Total 434779.00
Toisi 440060.00
Prospect Avenue Reconstruction
Page 2
No. Item
Estim. ted
Quantity
1. Special Excavation
7670 CY
2. Sub -Base Granular Material Type B
2420 CY
3. Aggregate Base Course Type B
5325 Too
4. Bituminous Material Prime Coat MC -30
1550 Gal
5. Bit. Conc. Binder Crse Coss I, Type 1, Mix B
830 Ton
6. Bit. Conc. Surface Crse Class I, Type 1, Mix D
780 Ton
7. Combination Concrete Curb & Gutter Type B 6.12
3350 LF
8. Concrete Curb Type B
65 LF
9. Concrete Curb & Gutter Removal
315 LF
10. Storm Sewers, Rubber Gasket Ty 1 12'
690 LF
It. Storm Sewers, Rubber Gasket Ty 1 15'
190 LF
12. Storm Sewers, Rubber Gasket Ty 1 18'
190 LF
13. Pipe Drains, Perforated, PVC 6'
1435 LF
14. Trench Backfill
1660 Ton
15. Porous Granular Backfill
475 Tan
16. Inlet Type A w/Ty 1 Frame, Open Lid
9 Es
17. Catch Basin Type A w/Ty 1 Frame, Cloud Lid
6 Be
18. Driveway Pavement Removal
140 SY
19. PCC Driveway Pavement 6'
S0 SY
20. Asphalt Driveway Pavement 3'
90 SY
21. PCC Sidewalk Removal & Replacement 5'
380 SF
:22. Parkway Restoration
4590 SY
123. TRAFFIC AND DUST CONTROL
l L.S.
ENGINEER'S
ESTIMATE
Unit Total
Unit Total
Unit Total
Unit Total
Unit Total
8.00
61360.00
14.00
33880.00
13.00
64225.00
1.60
2480.OD
36.00
29880.00
38.00
29640.O0
18.00
-60300.00
.10.00
650.00
4.00
1260.00
22.00
15180.00
25.00
4750.00
28.00
5320.00
10.00
14350.00
12.00
19920.00
12.00
5100.00
600.00
5400.00
1600.00
9600.OD
6.00
840.00
24.00
1200.00
20.00
1800.00
4.00
1520.00
5.00
22950.00
10,000.00
10000.00
Total 40fi60 i.00
Total
Total
Total
Total
Mount Prospect Public Works Departmeno-o
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: July 31, 1990
SUBJECT: Bid Opening of July 25, 1990
for Elevated Work Platform
On July 25, 1990, at 10:00 AM, sealed bids were opened for the
proposed purchase of an elevated work platform. Bid tabulations
are as follows:
Bidder Model Bid Amt
Lift Systems, Inc. SJ 322011 Skyjack $ 9,900
Lakeland Equipment Inc. SJ 322011 Skyjack 10,900
Powerlift Ltd. SJ 322011 Skyjack 11,940
Funds for this proposed purchase are appropriated in the current
budget, page 213, account code 48-077-93-8301, in the amount of
$20,000.
I recommend acceptance of the bid as submitted by Lift Systems,
Inc. in an amount not to exceed $9,900.
lsiL�-G
-Lxt
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
BIDS/ELWRKPLT.RES
Village of�_Acunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
I SNI
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JULY 31, 1990
SUBJECT: SEWER REHAB CONSTRUCTION -
FINAL CHANGE ORDER REQUESTS
Attached is back-up documentation requesting that we final out both the Prospect
Meadows Sewer work as well as the Village's sewer work. Specifically, we are requesting
that under the Prospect Meadows Sewer Program that the grouting contract be reduced
by $642.00 to a final amount of $16,620; that the Bob -O -Link Sewer Construction Project
be increased by an additional $15,288 bringing this final contract total to $404,393.
On the Village Sewer System, we are requesting that the spot relay construction for
sanitary sewer lines be increased by an additional $21,055; that the grouting contract for
the Village sewer be reduced by $4,758 and that the inspection engineering contract for
the Village be increased by a total of $6,000.
All of these changes will be final changes and will complete both of the sewer projects.
�IXON'JOHN FULTON
JFD/rcw
attachments
Mount Prospect Public Works Mpartment
INTERFFICE MEMORANUM Imn ca
ODmry
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director of Public Works
DATE: July 30, 1990
SUBJ: Sewer Rehab Construction
Final Change order Requests
Prospect Meadows Sewer System
All sewer repair work has been completed on the Prospect Meadows
Sewer Rehab Project. Also, the majority of the restoration work
has been completed with the exception of 19 outstanding punch
list items out of an original 62 items. Below is a summary of
the status of all contracts:
Contract A - Manhole Rehab
No change to the contract amount of $12,200, finaled out.
Contract B - Sewer Lining
No change to the contract amount of $434,573, finaled out.
Contract C - Grouting
Due to reduced actual measured lengths of sewer lines grout-
ed, the final contract amount came in lower. The original
contract was $17,262 and the final contract amount was
$16,620. Contract finaled out.
Contract "C-211 - Bob -O -Link
The Bob -Link sewer relay was the last contract to be com-
pleted and I am now requesting approval of the final con-
struction change order. The original approved contract
amount was $370,105. On April 17, 1990, the Village Board
approved a $19,000 increase to cover a complete asphalt
overlay to Bob -O -Link, bringing the new contract amount to
$389,105.
On October 16, 1989, 1 notified you that due to bad soil
conditions the contractor was forced to use all trench
backfill along Bob -O -Link instead of the excavated materi-
al. At that time Donohue estimated a possible increase of
$31,000. Based on final measured quantities this total
came to $15,288 (see attached memo and Donohue correspondence).
I am therefore requesting the Village Board approve this final
increase of $15,288 to Joel Kennedy's contract. This would make
a final contract amount of $404,393.
The IEPA has already approved $11,943 of the $15,288 as
grant eligible. $8,555 of this amount is currently in our
fund and $3,388 is pending final funding. The $19,000
increase for the additional asphalt work is still being
reviewed by TEPA.
Inspection Engineering Contracts
No change to the original contracts amount of $70,000.
Final close out pending completion of Bob -O -Link relay
punch list items.
For your information attached is a table outlining the final
project costs for Prospect Meadows Sanitary District and our
final and pending grant totals.
Village Sewer System
All sewer repair work has been completed on the Village Sani-
tary Sewer Rehab Project. Also the majority of the restoration
work has been completed with the exception of 21 outstanding
punch list items out on an original 38 items. Below is a summa-
ry of the status of all contracts.
Contract "B" - Sewer Lining
No change to the original contract amount of $315,896,
finaled out.
Contract IIB -211 - S20rt Relays
During the course of the sewer grouting contract on the
Village sanitary sewer system our contractor Visu-Sewer
reported 8 locations where the sewers were broken and/or
partially collapsed. On April 17, 1990, the Village Board
authorized the broken sewers to be repaired by our spot
repair contractor Joel Kennedy at an estimated cost of
$16,140. This estimate was based on removal and replace-
ment of 6 lineal feet of sewer main at each location.
All work is now complete with the actual repair lengths
averaging over 10 feet per repair, in fact, one location
was 16 feet long. (See attached letter from Donohue) There
was no way to tell exactly how many feet of the main sewer
needed repair until it was excavated and exposed.
-2-
In addition to the 8 original locations there were two
other sanitary sewer mains repaired. The first was at
Busse Rd. and Estates where we originally believed the
contractor, Joel Kennedy would be responsible for a repair
that had failed. However it turned out to entail the need
to replace 9 feet of additional existing sanitary sewer due
to interference with an adjacent storm sewer.
The other was an emergency repair to the 811 sanitary sewer
on Country Lane. Twenty-six feet of sewer completely col-
lapsed causing a total failure of the sanitary sewer sys-
tem. Because ground conditions are extremely poor in this
area, running sand, and the fact that the sewer is 15 feet
deep, Joel Kennedy was authorized to make the emergency
repair. Kennedy was in town working on his other repairs
at the time.
Joel Kennedy's final bill came to $37,195 for the 10 addi-
tional spot repairs. This amount is $21,055 over the al-
ready approved $16,140 increase to Joel Kennedy's con-
tract. I am therefore requesting the Village Board approve
a final increase of $21,055 to Joel Kennedy's contract.
Under the original IEPA grant all ten of these repair loca-
tions were shown to be cost effective for repair. I will
be submitting a change order request to the IEPA requesting
an increase to our grant to cover this $37,195 increase to
Joel Kennedy's spot repair contract.
Contract "C" - Grounting
Due to reduced actual measured lengths of sewer lines grout-
ed, the final contract amount came in lower. The original
contract amount was $30,407 and final contract amount was
$25,649 contract finaled out.
Inspection Engineering Contract
In conjunction with the additional spot repairs our con-
sulting engineer Donohue Associates has incurred additional
engineering and inspection fees directly related to the
additional work. Attached is a letter from Donohue outlin-
ing their justification of a request for a $6,000 increase
to their existing $33,000 contract.
This increase request also requires Village Board approval
and like the additional repair work dollars, I will be sub-
mitting a request to the IEPA for a grant increase to cover
the additional $6,000.
-3-
For your information attached is a table outlining the final
project cost for the Village sanitary sewer rehabilitation.
This table reflects all final contract amounts, our current
grant approval amounts, and pendin grant t a
tats.
Glen R. Andler
GRA/eh
attach.
I concur with this recommendation.
cc: Jerry McIntosh
SEWREHAB.FIN
-4-
April 18 ,1990
Joel Kennedy Constructing Corp.
P.O. Box 509
Gurnee , 111. 60031
Attn:Joel Kennedy
President
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS Re: Villageof Mount Prospect
Contract "B" & "C"
SCI ENT IS TS Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Donohue Project No. 15800
Dear Joel ,
Per my telephone conversation with Glen Andler this morning , Glen adyiseo the Village Board
approved the (8) additional spot repairs and resurfacing of Bob -O -Link as described in the
attached letters of April 9 ,1990 at their April 17th board meeting.
We'd appreciate you starting this work as soon as possible. We will also begin assembling a
change order to cover this additional work for your execution in the near future.
If you have any questions regarding the above , please feel free to contact me at extension 278.
Sincerely ,
Donohue & ie , Inc.
E. dSeidenzahi P. E.
Project Manager
Construction Related Services
enc: April 9 ,1990 letter regarding (8) additional Spot Relays
" resurfacing of Bob -O- Link
cc: Olen R. Ander ..... Village of Mount Prospect
Deputy Director of Public Works
Jeff Druckman .... Donohue & Associates , I nc.
Jim P fester ........ Donohue & Associates , I no.
■ 1,501 Woodfield Road
Swire 200 Fan
Schaumburg, 1111 ids 60173
7ft6Z..8800
Telefax 708605.89/4
r
April 9 ,1990
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect , Illinois 60056
Attn : Glen R. Andler
Deputy Director of Public Works
Re: Village of Mount Prospect
• E!NGINE ERS Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
ARCHITECTS Contract "B" (Village Portion)
SCIENTISTS Donohue Project No. 15800
Dear Mr. Andler,
Per your request at our meeting on April 5 , 1990 in which we reviewed several sanitary sewer
video tapes from the recently completed sewer grouting contract , the following is an estimate of
the cost of adding (8) repair sections into Contract "B" which were found to be sources of
infiltration into the sanitary sewer system :
From To Line
Location Manhole Manhgle St ion Size Lenoth niPry Cost
Elm Street ..... 28S 102 ... 28SO07 ... 0+81 ........ 8" 6 L.F. $330/1-.F. $ 1,980.00
2. Elm Street ...- 28S 102 ... 28SO07 ... 205-208.. 8"
$ 1,980.00
3. Louis Street..... 29SO I I ... 29SO 14 ... 0+26 ........ 8"
$ 1,980.00
4. Estates Drive.... 12SO 17 ...125018 ... 0+59 ........ 8"
$ 1,980.00
5. Wille Street .... 17SO33 ...175037 ... 1+93 ....... 8"
$ 1,980.00
6. Busse Road ......12S020 ...12SO22 ... 062-064..12" " $350/L.F,
$ 2,100.00
7. Hat ten Ave. ..... OIS042 ...025016 ... 1+59 ........ 12" " '"
$ 2,100.00
8. Berkshire.. ...... 18S034 ...17SO43 ... 0+64— .... 10" " $340/L.1`.
$ 2.040.QO
Totalest of _Additional Relay Work .......
$ 16,140.00
The above figure is based on an estimated 6 lineal feet of sewer replacement at each location,
Final measurements taken at the time of the replacement may reflect an increase or decrease in
the estimated 6 lineal feet.
If you have any questions regarding the above , please feel free to call me at ext. 278.
Sincerely ,
DONOHUE &ASSOCIATES , INC.
E . David SeidenzahI P.E.
Project Manager
Construction Related Services
■ 1501 Wvdfreld Road
Suite 200 Fast
Schaumburg, Ithwis 60173
708605.8800
Telefax 708.605.8914
April 9 ,1990
village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect , Illinois 60056
Attn : Glen R. Andler
Deputy Director of Public Works
E'* G I I E E R S Re: Vi lage of Mount Prospect
3RCHITECTS Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Contract " C " (Bob -O -Link Sewer Replacement)
"'E'r STS Donohue Project No. 15800
Dear Mr.,Andler.
Per your request , we recently received a Quote for Joel Kennedy Constructing Corp. for the
complete resurfacing of Bob -O -Link Road. You' 11 recall we recommended the Village pursue
resurfacing the entire width of Bob -O -Link for the following reasons:
1. The road was already badly deteriorated prior to starting work and due to the nature of
sewer construction , the road has deteriorated further. The deterioration was most
probably caused by a very poor sub -grade and unstable soil conditions encountered during
construction.
2. Portions of the road were removed as part of the sanitary sewer construction work for
which Joel Kennedy is responsible to replace. However , replacement of only portions of
the road could result in further deterioration due to improper drainage caused by eventual
differential settlements.
As we advised at our meeting on April 5 ,1990 , we believe Kennedy's quote of S 19,000.00
which includes all grinding and prime coat prior to application of the 1 1/2* resurfacing course
is reasonable. The resurfacing would occur after Kennedy has repaired all areas damaged due to
his construction operations.
Please advise at your earliest convienence if the Village concurs with proceeding with this
additional work.
Sincerely ,
DONOHUE & IA , INC.
E . David Seidenzahl P.E.
Project Manager
Construction Related Services
■ 1501 %bbcddfi& Rood
Suite 200 Farr
Sdtwonbutg, 11kno•s 60173
708 605.8800
Telefax 708603.8914
July 23, 1990
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect , Illinois 60056
Attn : Olen R. Andler
Deputy Director of Public Works
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS Re: Village of Mount Prospect
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
SC I ENT I STS Contract "B" (Village Portion)
Donohue Project No. 15800
Dear Mr. Andler,
The purpose of this letter is to convey the actual costs of the (8) sanitary sewer spot repairs
detailed in our previous letter of April 9 , 1990 as weWas additional work performed on
Country Lane and Busse Road. The actual costs are as follows:
From To Line
Location Manhole Manhole Station Size LgnglLh Unit Price. cost
1. Elm Street ..... 28S102 ... 28SO07 — 0+81 ........ 8" 9.5 L.F. $330/1-.F. $3,135.00
2. Elm Street ..... 285102 ... 28SO07 ... 205-208.. 8" 8.0 L.F. $2,640.00
3. Louis Street..... 295011 ... 29SO14 ... 0+26 ........ 8" 8.5 L.F. $2,805.00
4. Estates Drive.... 125017 ...125018 ... 0+59 ........ 8" 9.0 L.F. $2,970.00
5. Wille Street.... 17SO33...175037... 1+93 ....... 8" 9.0 L.F. $2,970.00
6. Busse Road ......125020 ... I 2SO22 — 062-064..12" 8.0 L.F. $350/1-.F. $2,800.00
7. HatlenAye. .....015042 ...025016 — 1+59 ...... - 12" 16.0 L.F. $5,600.00
B. Berkshire ........ 18S034 ...175043 — 0+64 ....... 10" 7.01-.F. $340/L.F. $2,380.00
9. Busse Road ....... 12SO20- . 1 2SO22 — 0+43 ...... 12" 9.0 L.F. $350/L.F. $3,150.00
10. Country Lane..... 275025... 27SO21 ... 1+50 ....... 8" 26.5 L.F. $330A.F. $8,745.00
Total &1& = of 50itional Relay Az ....... $37,195.00
Our original estimation of $16,140.00 for completion of Item I through 8 proved to be over
optimistic in that we had estimated each relay would entail the removal and replace of 6 lineal
4aet of mainline. If we had based our estimation on a replacement length of 10 lineal feet as
specified on each original contractural spot replacement , our estimate would have been
$ 26,900.00. The actual cost of Item I through 8 is $25,300.00.
The work performed on Busse Road at. station 0+43 which we originally believed would be a
repair the contractor would be responsible for, turned out to entail the need to replace 9.0
additional lineal feet of existing sanitary sewer due to an interference with an adjacent storm
sewer. The work on Country Lane was performed immediately after the Village advised a section
of the sanitary sewer had collapsed in this location.
8 1501 9bodfield Road
Suite 200 East
Schaumburg, Illinois 60173
M 005.8800
Mohr 708.605.8914
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS
In summary , the additional $ 9,160 for the cost of making repairs on Item 1 through 8 as well
as the $ 1 1,895.00 worth of work added on Busse Road and Country Lane accounts for the
$ 21,055.00 increase -over and above our $16,140.00 estimation detailed in our letter of
April 9 , 1990.
Our records also indicate the additional work took the following amount of time to complete:
(5) Working days to complete excavation , relay & backfilling
(3) to perform jetting for compaction purposes
(2) to install topsoil in preparation for sodding
(2) to complete sodding ( estimated)
12 Working Days x 1.4 Calendar Days/ Working Day = 16.8 Calendar Days
Please advise if we may proceed with incorporation of the above information into the final
change order for the project. I can be reached at extension 278.
Sincerely ,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIA S , INC.
E . David Seidenzah4P,
Project Manager
Construction Related Services
attach: Donohue'sApril 9 , 1990 Letter
cc: Herbert L. Weeks .... Village of Mount Prospect
Director of Public Works
Jeff Druckman .......... Donohue & Associates
Jim Piaster ............... Donohue & Associates
July 23, 1990
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Attn: Glen R. Andler
Deputy Director of Public Works
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS Re: Village of Mount Prospect
SCIENTISTS Amendment to Engineering Agreement
Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Contract "B" (Village Portion)
Donohue Project No. 15800
Dear Mr. Andler,
The purpose of this letter is to summarize what impact the spot
replacement work recently added to above contract has had on our
original September 30, 1988 Engineering Agreement.
On April 5, 1990, Donohue met with the Village to review the
television tapes of the completed (31) contractual spot replace-
ments. Donohue pointed out at the meeting that the re -televising
had revealed several additional areas of excess infiltration
which we recommended the Village consider repairing. The Village
Board approved proceeding with the (8) additional spot replace-
ments at their April 17, 1990 Board meeting.
Our original engineering agreement specifies the scope of con-
struction related engineering services would be performed for a
total estimated ceiling price of $33,000.00. The total charges
incurred as of week ending April 7, 1990, were approximately
$32,000.00, leaving sufficient funds to close out the project.
However, there are not sufficient funds to cover additional field
inspection and office administration costs incurred due to the
added spot replacement work.
In summary, we herein request an amendment to our original agree-
ment in the amount of $6,000.00 to cover the additional resident
inspection and contract administration costs associated with the
(8) additional spot replacements as tabulated below:
0 1501 Woodfield Road
Suite 200 Fast
Sdiawnburg. Illinois 60173
70&605.88W
Tekfax 708.605.8914
If this extra compensation for additional services meets with
your approval, please execute both copies of this request and
return one to us for our files.
Sincerely,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Donald C. Zimm?, P.E.
Vice President
E. David Seiden h P.E.
Project Manager
Construction Related Services
DCZ/EDS:kav
T/L/DXO
Village of Mount Prospect
page 2
N 1501 KbodfieldRoad
Suite 200 East
Schaumburg, 111ir"s 60173
708605-.8800
Telefax 708605.8914
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
John Fulton Dixon
Village manager
Date
Resident
Contract
Inspection
Administration
Week
Ending
4-14-90
$1,000.00
$100.00
Week
Ending
4-21-90
$ 600.00
$375.00
Week
Ending
4-28-90
$1,900.00
$ 75.00
Week
Ending
5-5-90
$ 650.00
$175.00
Week
Ending
5-12-90
N/A
$250.00
Week
Ending
5-19-90
N/A
$475.00
ENGINEERS Week
Ending
5-26-90
N/A$400.00
ARCHITECTS
$4,150.00
$1,185.00
SCIENTISTS
$4,150.00
+$1,185.00
TOTAL AMOUNT
OF AMENDMENT
.............
$6,000.00
If this extra compensation for additional services meets with
your approval, please execute both copies of this request and
return one to us for our files.
Sincerely,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Donald C. Zimm?, P.E.
Vice President
E. David Seiden h P.E.
Project Manager
Construction Related Services
DCZ/EDS:kav
T/L/DXO
Village of Mount Prospect
page 2
N 1501 KbodfieldRoad
Suite 200 East
Schaumburg, 111ir"s 60173
708605-.8800
Telefax 708605.8914
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
John Fulton Dixon
Village manager
Date
7-20-90
Village Sanitary Sewer Rehab
Final Project Cost Siminlaty
Original
Final
Amount
Amount
70% Approved
Amount Pending
Contract
Contract
Grant
Grant
Grant
Grant
Giant
Contracts
Amount
Amount
Approved
Ineligible
Amount
Approval
Funding
Engineering
Design
$19,525
$19,525
$32,306
$22,614
Construction
Engineering
33,000
39,000
32,969
$33
23,078
$6,000
$6.000
Subtotal
$52,525
$58,525
$65,275
$33
$45,692
$6,000
$6,000
Construction
Contract *B"
Sewer lining
$315,797
$315,797
$315,896
$221,127
Contract "B-2*
Spot Relays
144,250
198,667
151,013
$459
105,709
$37,195
$37.799
contract *C*
Grouting
30,407
25.549
30,407
21,285
Subtotal
$490,454
$ 530,113
$497,316
$459
$348,121
$37.195
$37,799
Combined
Total$
$542,979
$ SNAM
$562,591
$492
$393,813
$43,195
$43,799
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
7W MY tu
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: October 16, 1989
SUBJ: Prospect Meadows
Sewer Replacements - Bob -O -Link
The installation of the new 10" sanitary sewer on the south side
of Bob -O -Link is currently about 50% completed. Work is pro-
gressing on schedule but we have encountered one major prob-
lem. The plans and specifications call for the excavated ma-
terial to be placed back into the trench unless they are cross-
ing a driveway or are within 10' of any roadway at which time
trench fill (stone) must be used. Because this sewer is being
installed in exactly the same location as the existing sewer the
ground of the old existing trench is not as stable as the engi-
neers anticipated.
As a result of this they have been forced to use additional
trench backfill versus the excavated material. This could in-
crease the contract by as much as $31,000. The sewer depth
ranges from 18' to 201 deep and even though they are using a
shoring box to minimize the width of the excavation the old
trench keeps falling in. (see attached pictures)
We are currently within budget as far as pay requests, but when
we approach the end of the contract I will submit a change order
request which will include the final quantities of trench back-
fill used and the associated increases to the contract.
-61Zen A. Andler
GRA/eh
Attached
cc: H.L. Weeks
October 11, 1989
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
ENriNEERS Director of Public Works
ARCHITECTS
Re: Bob -O -Link Road
SCIENT IS TS Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Contract "C"
Donohue Project No. 15800
Gentlemen:
As Construction of the proposed 10" sanitary sewer on the south
side of Bob -O -Link Road has gotten underway, the following condi-
tions have been encountered:
1. The material being excavated prior to installation of
the new sewer is an extremely wet, unstable clay. This
condition is a result of the sewer having to be located
in the existing slow draining ditch line.
2. When the existing sanitary sewer was installed, the
width of the trench apparently encroached on the roadway
and improper backfill material and compaction methods
were utilized. We believe this is the reason that as
the trench for the new sewer is being excavated, the old
trench is defining itself and in turn falling into the
excavation.
Based on these conditions, it is our recommendation that granular
backfill be utilized in lieu of the specified excavated material
as called for in the plans. It is our opinion this is necessary
to avoid future settlement of the roadway.
The contract currently includes unit prices for sanitary sewer
installed utilizing either excavated or granular material for
backfill. Based on the granular backfill unit price being $35.00
per lineal foot more than the excavated material unit price,
there is the possibility of there being a $31,000.00 increase in
the cost of the project if granular material is required for the
entire run of 10" sanitary sewer.
Donohue will continue to closely monitor the situation and inform
the Village of Mount Prospect accordingly. We will insist the
contractor continue to use caution as excavation proceeds and
should conditions change for the better, we will again utilize
excavated material as backfill.
If you have any questions regarding this issue, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
ENGINEERS Sincerely,
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS
DONOHUE& ASSOCI S, INC.
E. David Seidenza 1 E.
Project Manager
Construction Related Services
JSD/EDS/MJD:ppc
cc: Glen R. Andler, Deputy Director of Public Works
Mike Drey, Donohue & Associates, Inc.
Jeff Druckman, Donohue & Associates, Inc.
T/L/ZX6
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
October 11, 1989
Page 2
APPENDIX A
CHANGE C;Z-'=A ::C. 1
owner Village of Mount Prospect Date 10-�:O 89
Project Bob -O -Link Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation
Contract 'C' ccnc:ac:or Joel Kennedy Constructing
Cate of Ccntract Time start 9-18-89 Original Contac: =.ward 5.105 _
rrYr*firYr+xlr*xr if Rtr*r;.tYt*ttfi4rrYrr.ttr.tt...rfrl+x.a.x..rr..rr.tr.Y.*.a...e
Chance ordered erew t:h: See attached.
Y.rr+rtrtr xrr**x+r.Yr*tfYYY.trY.tr...eY♦Ytl...ret.tt.fi».+xr.rYrix. a.+Y....+a...
Reascn _-_ Change Order: See attached.
Rt.;fittr.rr.r*».YY.x.Y.r*Yt*t.tY..fi....rr...r..rrt+..rfi....xxa.ai....**a*..+.rr
-� --cs
-- --na-
-= - -
= e --
5398,105.00
_r_:_..a_.
90
120
i�f;
0.00
ADO: D_ .;C_,
0
0
-his C._,.
_..__ C.C.
17,225.00(1:
..D' :_DSC,_ ,
0
0 T
ZE;I=ED:
5 380,880.00
_ :_C
90
120
C _.,-cI. Da - e: 12-16-89 1-15-90
-ev+ cc -o_. Dat_.-1�=ib�t9 1- �-
r+rtt+trr+rrrtt+r+frrrerr+rr*r+tttYtee♦re».rrrrfi+++.rtitr.rrrrrr+r*Pete*.ttr..e
It is acreed 'v _.._ Contract__ that ...is c^ar=e order _.-__.:des _ and a_:. -_5:3
associated wita or --;_---- crcm -ne cn_ ce ordered ner__n,
.'tract, µelays, and acceler-__.,.. cc_ts. Ot^-__ ,-:an the __rear a -:c;.... and _.--
_•
a result c'_ ...is c-_. -
e.rfi»»rr+r»r*trrrrrar.e..re.:»++rrr.....r.......r.»»+r»t....... ..r+...Y+..... .x
C..:_ DOCUMENT T _ _. AN ---',DX ENT _ -.-C CON=--_ AND -_:.
':?UL -AT --'CNS r..'D SHALL �
.
tfYtt*YttYtY+;Y»f..fi.Y.f»R.......Wrr
Vi l 9 r7..4e�f &unt Prospect
Owner :ate
Joel Kennedy Costructin g Copp. _
Dcnc'-se a -sscci es, _
,,
»iter»xYrYYrxxr.Ysl.t*rx*x.xr+»trr+ra*ex.tYfixxr..t»Yt+rY...t..xr...............
Donchu e a Associates, =nc. - neers a Arc.. -_cc:_
16500.201/ 1
=r- -d. Cn_ ._
Numo- er cr___ :1C.
*Donohue & Associates, Inc. - 1989
SUMMARY OF CHANGE ORDER NO. 1
NET
TOTAL
UNIT
ITEM
(544.00)
PRICE
4.
10" PVC SDR -35 SAN. SEWER
5160.00
$14.700.00
W/ EXC. 4ATL. BACKFILL
5.
10" PVC SDR -35 SAN. SEWER
5195.00
W/ GRAN. IUITL. BACKFILL
6.
10" PVC SDR -35 SEWER TO BE
5300.00
BORED AND JACKED IN 24"
STEEL CASING
7.
48" DIA. SANITARY MANHOLE
53,000.00
REPL W/ SELF SEALING
WATERTIGHT COVER
8.
48" DIA SAN. OUTSIDE DROP
$5400.00
MH PLACE. AND REPL. W/
SELF SEALING WATERTIGHT COVER
9.
LUMP SUM DEDUCT
(528,000.00)
NET
TOTAL
CHANGE
CHANGE S
(544.00)
($87,040.00)
457.00
989,115.00
49.00
$14.700.00
3.00 59.000.00
(3.00) ($15,000.00)
1.00 (528,000-00)
TOTAL THIS
CHANGE ORDER ($17.225.00)
SUMMARY OF CHANGES TO ITEMS 4 & 5
-----------------------------------------------------------
:4. 10" PVC W1 EXC. MATL. BCKL:5. 10" PVC W/ EXC. GRAN. BCI
PLAN
: ACTUAL
: :
PLAN
: ACTUAL :
---------------------------------------------
LOCATION
:QUANTITY
:QUANTITY
: CHANGE :QUANTITY
----------------------------
:QUANTITY :
CHANGE
V,.MH
14
TO
MH
15
190.00
190.00
0.00
65.00
60.00 »
(5.0(
,:.4H
15
TO
MH
16
201.00
» 167.00
(34.00):
51.00
77.00
26.0(
,,QMH
16
TO
MH
17
» 168.00
0.00
(168.00):
19.00
187.00
163.0(
:MH
17
TO
MH
18
147.00
0.00
147.00)
73.00
217.00
144.0(
;MH
18
TO
MH
20
» 178.00
0.00
(178.00):
21.00
189.00
168.0(
:MH
20
TO
MH
21
17.00
0.00
(17.00):
138.00
102.00
(36.0(
�kMH
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
21
TO
MH
22
0.00
0.00
0.00
118.00
110.00
(8.0(
901.00
357.00
(544.00)
485.00
942.00
457.0(
CHANGEORDER NO.
ITEM NO. 4 1011 PVC SDR -35 SAN. SEWER WITH EXC. t,,L�TL. BACKFILL
EXPLANATION: Decrease in this quantity was for the following
reasons:
1. The lineal footage of bored and jacked pipe was
increased therefore,this item is decreased by
49 l.f.(see explanation for item no. 6).
2. The lineal footage of 10" PVC with granular matl.
was increased therefore, this item is decreased
by 457.0 1.f. (see explanation for item no. 5) .
3. The difference in actual measured and plan quan-
tities causes a decrease in plan quantity of
38.0 1.f.
ITEM NO. .5 10 " 7 -DVC SDP -35 SAN. SE WITH GRA -N- 1 -1 -=.TL. 3ACKFI:.:,
EXPLANATION: This item ,,Tas increased for the following reason:
1. Due to extremely wet and unstable excavated
material and the trench's close proximity to
the roadway ( at times in the roadway), the amount
of granular backfill required was increased to
avoid future failure of the roadway. ( See attached
letter and breakdown).
ITEM NO. 6 10" PVC SDR -35 SEWER TO BE BORED A -ND JACKED IN CASING
EXPLANATION: Due to the close proximity of the adjoining houses,
depth of cut, and existing zrees and structures, the
boring and jacking was increased by 49' to take it all
the way into the Francis Cadillac parking lot. If the
work had been performed in an open cut fashion it
would have caused the removal of a 30" tree, a storage
shed, and the possible damage to the foundations of
the two houses.
ITEM NO. 7 & 8
MIP-NHOLES 48" with and without drop connections
EXPLANATION: Manholes 15,16, and 17 which were proposed to be drop
manholes, but due to actual locations and angles
of the laterals drop manholes were not utilized
Therefore, Item No. 7 was increased by 3 and Item
No. 8 was decreased by 3.
October 11, 1989
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Attn: Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
ENGINEERS Director of Public Works
ARCHITECTS
Re: Bob -O -Link Road
SCIE�iiSTS Sanitary Sewer Replacement
Contract "C"
Donohue Project No. 15800
Gentlemen:
As construction of the proposed 10" sanitary sewer on the south
side of Bob -O -Link Road has gotten underway, the following condi-
tions have teen encountered:
1. The material being excavated prior to installation of
the new sewer is an extremely wet, unstable clay. This
condition is a result of the sewer having to be located
in the existing slow draining ditch line.
2. When the existing sanitary sewer was installed, the
width of the trench apparently encroached on the roadway
and improper backfill material and compaction methods
were utilized. We believe this is the reason that as
the trench for the new sewer is being excavated, the old
trench is defining itself and in turn falling into the
excavation.
Based on these conditions, it is our recommendation that granular
backfill be utilized in lieu of the specified excavated material
as called for in the plans. It is our opinion this is necessary
to avoid future settlement of the roadway.
The contract currently includes unit prices for sanitary sewer
installed utilizing either excavated or granular material for
backfill. Based on the granular backfill unit price being $35.00
per lineal foot more than the excavated material unit price,
there is the possibility of there being a $31,000.00 increase in
the cost of the project if granular material is required for the
entire run of 10" sanitary sewer.
Donohue will continue to closely monitor the situation and inform
the Village of Mount Prospect accordingly. We will insist the
contractor continue to use caution as excavation proceeds and
should conditions change for the better, we will again utilize
excavated material as backfill.
If you have any questions regarding this issue, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
ENGINEERS Sincerely,
ARCHITECTS
DONOHUE &
ASSOCIZES "INC
SCIENTISTS E. David Seidenza IE.
Project Manager t
Construction Related Services
JSD/EDS/MJD:ppc
cc: Glen R. Andler, Deputy Director of Public Works
Mike Drey, Donohue & Associates, Inc.
Jeff Druckman, Donohue & Associates, Inc.
T/L/ZX6
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
October 11, 1989
Page 2
CHANGE ORDER NO. 2
Ownerf M ,'PM,08ct e December 20„ 1989
?roject ob- -Link Sanitary Sewer
Contract 'C' Contractor Joel Kennedy Constructing_ Corp.
Date of Contract705—
Time Start 9/1$/89 Organal Contract Award S
39T, M
Change Ordered I.Herewith: See attached.
Reason for C -:a -_e ___ . --_lance C= . C'_,.e- _ : -cared tc ;.:an-auantities.
See.cr a: _ na.reSt ratio .tETi.
TRT..T.. T.. .. ..TXX TTTTTTT T"TTTr� T"TRFX..RTT.TTT TTT.TT RTTTTTTT]'TTT� TTT;T'"T.RFT r'y,'T.TR
z„'._Evs, Cis.' r :____ C«_on --.1. s .D:*--:- -:-.an _he
reser_. 0_ :.._s =e Or..=_ .
..r.r.Rr.rr.*r.Xr.Rrr.Trr.TrT.Rr.r.r.r.Tr.r.r.r.xTXrr.;Rx;rr.xt.r.Rr.r.zRRRRRXr.x;x;xRr.*r.*x P.Rr.xXr.*
_.,•._rac:or t 1 Date
c�DO 2
ro. r ec:� Cnance
Number Order No.
CC'\- =. CT
:'XvU`;T
'.^ C'
:'°J (CAL.
DAYS)
To subs.
To final
=om::1et i on
completion
_J::S l_. S
inD�/:)�D'jC
J
0
C.D.
'_S
120
-_ v.7 _-_• JG.. '..
Imo!/:. I��
_0
TRT..T.. T.. .. ..TXX TTTTTTT T"TTTr� T"TRFX..RTT.TTT TTT.TT RTTTTTTT]'TTT� TTT;T'"T.RFT r'y,'T.TR
z„'._Evs, Cis.' r :____ C«_on --.1. s .D:*--:- -:-.an _he
reser_. 0_ :.._s =e Or..=_ .
..r.r.Rr.rr.*r.Xr.Rrr.Trr.TrT.Rr.r.r.r.Tr.r.r.r.xTXrr.;Rx;rr.xt.r.Rr.r.zRRRRRXr.x;x;xRr.*r.*x P.Rr.xXr.*
_.,•._rac:or t 1 Date
c�DO 2
ro. r ec:� Cnance
Number Order No.
CEkSSE
ORDER NO V. :NL-,U PAGE OF
iA%, SUER RVI.. TR
lu ui isfou HAD
sma, num.'s VIILJGE OF NOUIT PROSPECT
CCRTRACT T
50*1'.1f 1103 90. i(500.201
25K MW 5 k R: VILLA- IF POUNT PKSPECT
N ;ET kET
XET.::A!:3 E. L:V:k, I.::
o
L
0 To E:: !E:I.
EYE -.k:......, NNN.
LEE:
YY
o
74 'n.
Y:i: o
. CHANGE ORDER N0. 2
Explanation:
ITEM NO. 10. ADDITIONAL RESTORATION
This item was made necessary due to additional easement requirements
in the parking lot of Francis Cadillac. The addtional requirements
included asphalt removal and replacement. This additional work
was not known at the time of bid.
All other items on this change order are are results of balancingplan quar.: es
with actual measurements.
3 '+IMAPY CHAtiG_S TO 1, _MS 2
--
-- - ---
--i3" PVC µW/�EXC.
MATL.�ECK.L.,3.
a FVC
W/ _YC.
GRAN. SCK-.
_P_�-�____
�.CTLAL
PLAN
ACTUAL
T'.
:UAN _-
CHANGa QUANT:TY
:CUAt!T:
:MH
27
TC MH 26
,�Z.CO
:.
(3 .00),
210.010
_,=.50
.MH
35
TO MH
12.00
, O.C.,
, (SC OCi.
22.010
82.50
1C.5C
H
d � H 3',
, 95 .00
32. OC
:3.00) .
53.00
. 53. 00
0. .,
MH
30
T0 "1W "C
Z0. CO
2?.30
. (0.70).
25.00
. 25.00
1.CC
___T0TALS�___
_442.00�
284.30
77.70
310.001
37a.00
B -a.C�
M i II ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS Page 1 Of 2
CHANGE ORDER NO. 3 (Final)
Owner Village of Mount Prospect Date _. June 14 , 1990
Project Sanitary Sewer Rehabilitation (Bob - O - Link Road Sewer Replacement)
Contract "C . Contractor Joel Kennedy Constructing Corp.
Date of Contract Time Start 9-18-89 Original Contract Award $398,105.00
##�►,t###aaa#t###aaa#lila#taa#sat##tt#tt#####t###a###a###ttaa####t#*��►###�#####�►
Change Ordered Herewith :
1. Overlay the entire width of Bob -O - Link Road with 11/2.. of new bituminous surface course. ,.. + $19,000.00
2. Suspend contract time as of November 3 ,1989 and reinstate on April 16 ,1990. + 2 calendar
days
##########�►#####a#######�►#t#####tit#########��######��#####################tt##
Reason for Change Order
1. See Page 2 of 2
2.
CONTRACT AMOUNT
Original : s 398,105.00
Previous C.D.'s
(AtI11I/DEDUCT) S 12,712.00
This C.O.
(ADD/IlI1I11mur) j 19,000.00
CONTRACT TIME (CAL.
To subs.
compl l on
Original 90
Previous C.D.'s
(ADD/DEDUCT)
This C.O.
(ADDINKItNW)
-0-
-0-
DAYS)
To final
completion
120
-0-
REVISED ; 404,393.00 REVISED 90 122
Orig. compl. Date: 12-16-89 1-15-90
Rev. Compl. Date: 1 1- 3-89 (actual) 6-29-90
###ttttt###t#a#a#aa#tttttttt#t#�►#�ttta###tt###tt####tttta t####t######tt##tt##�##
Itis agreed bu theContrsctor that thin change order includes any and all coats associated with or resulting from the
change order herein, including all impact, delays and acceleration costs. Other than the dollar amount and time
allowance listed above, there shall be no further (imeor dollar compensation as a result of this change order.
aaatttttttt#t#�#�#�►#�►#tttattt#lata#at++#tat.at#a###*#t�r.tit#tt##t#t#�r#a##tt#tit##t#
THIS DOCUMENT SHALL BECOME AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT AND All
STIPULATIONS AND COVENANTS OF THE CONTRACT SHAH APPLY HERETO.
ttttttt#tttttttttttttttttttttt#t##tilts#t##tt#atttttt+aa##at#tttt#tttttt###tall##
Village of Mount Prospect By; ~' ��✓.; V� "
Owner Date
Joel Kennedy Constructi ng Corp. By:
Contractor Date
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC. By: a.136
` l Date
taatt##tttattttat#atttttt#tttst�►tttttttt#tit##arta#ttttt#t# t#tt#ttt�rtt#tttt�r*�
Donohue & Associates, Inc. Engi nears &Architects
16499.201 2 ( Final )
Project hange
Number rder No.
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS
CHRNSE ORDER NO. i (Final)
Reason For Change Order :
Page 2 of 2
Heavy construction traffic loads coupled with the close proximity of the roadway's existing
poor sub -grade in relationship to the required deep excavation of wet unstable soils for the
new sewer caused the roadway surface to deteriorate extensively .
Patching only portions of the roadway would result in a piece meal effect leading to further
deterioration in the short term due to improper drainage caused by differential settlements.
2. The contract time suspension on November 3 , 1989 coincides with the data of actual
substantial completion. (47) calender days of the total 122 contractural calendar days
for final completion had expired as of November 3 , 1989. Contract time was suspended for
suitable weather conditions under which to complete restoration on the project.
With (75 ) calendar days of contract time remaining , contract time was reinstated on
April 16 ,1990. The revised eDntractural final completion date is inturn June 29 ,1990.
7-20-90
Prospect Meadows Sainkally Dlistriid
Final Project
Cost &=nary
Original
Final
Amount
Amount
70% Approved
Amount Pending
Contract
Contract
Grant
Grant
Grant
Grant
Grant
Contracts Amount
Amount
Approved
Ineligible
Amount
Approval
Funding
Engineering
SSES Report $32,000
$32,000
$32.000
Flow Monitoring 5,000
5,000
5,000
Design
Engineering 47,250
47,250
$49,502
$ 34,651
Construction
Engineering 70,000
70,000
61,838
8,162
43,287
Subtotal $154,250
$154,250
$111,340
$45,162
$77,938
Constructlon
Contract 'A'
Manhole Rehab $ 12,200
$12,200
$ 12,2W
$8,540
Contract 'B"
Sower Lining 434,573
434,573
434,573
304,201
Contract "C'
Grouting 17,262
18,620
16,620
11,634
Contract 'C,2'
Bob•O-Unk 370,105
404,393
264.898
$100,495
199,429
$19,000
$22,388
Subtotal $834,140
$867,786
$748,291
$100,495
$523,804
$19,000
$22,388
Combined
Totalll $ 988,390
$1,022,036
$859,631
$145.657
$601,742
$19,000
$22,3118
Bob-aUnk Sewer Relay
Original Contract Award
$370,105
Approved Complete Asphalt Overlay Increase
19,000
Additional Trench File Request
15,288
Final Contract Amount
$40.4,393
VfLIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER %yv�_
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS; DIRECTOROF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: AUGUST 1, 1990
SUBJECT: DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT STRATEGY
At the July 23rd meeting to discuss downtown redevelopment, there was consensus from the
Village Board to proceed with a -market review and a community survey to determine
opinions about downtown.
The market review and survey will be done by Camiros, Ltd. In order to proceed, Camiros
has prepared the attached work order for your authorization. These work orders detail the
steps in the process, and the full scope of the work to be done.
As you suggested, these items should be reviewed by the Village Board at their meeting of
August 7, 1990.
DMC:hg
J1 I
J-7f� ?13_9260_22 P. 02
%oaf I UrM 411 S. Wells, Chicago, Illinois 60607 (312) 922-9211
WORK ORDER rOX14
This work order is tor :onsultinq services to be provided by
Camiros Ltd., in accordance with the ACREEMENT bet i the City of
Nlount I . - -
Prospect, I'l-nois and Caln`rQs, Ltd, dated 4 =11f
WORK 0?ZZF. NUMBER: 3.
ASSIGNMENT: Market Reconnaissance afkd Data Assembly
SERVICES TO BE PZRr0RvMZ: The 7111 -age will assemble existing
and available material:, pertinent to the project. This includes,
but is nor limited to rr.app,��d existing land use, building condi-
tions surva-Ys, existing informa4:ion, the type and square footage
of offiies and stores within the subarea, traffic counts, parking
courts, location of sewer and water mains, copies of the TIF
study, and relevant backup, materials, copies of all studle-, or
plans prepared as part of the Triangle Pc,-.�ject, c�;rrent copy of
the zoning ordinance and map, and any other current maps, plans,
or other documents pertinent to the project area.
The consultant will review taxis information, undertake a recon-
naissance of the project area, and note any additiona'l information
that Is required to cQndtct the Study. The consultant shall meet
with - age tv discuss -
h representati the findings of
this review andd to agrea upon strategies for Providing any neces-
sary additional data. It is the -anderstanding of the Village and
consultant tha5;, except for the parkin;; survey if necessary), the
data needed for this project has been assembled by the Village.
The onsultant will .nderta;ze a recornaissance of commercial uses
within a trade area and competit4 - ve market area that relates to
the Mount Prospect zesid,entia_l population and the commercial ar-
eas. This will not be an in-depth market study, but rather an
assessrent of the kinds Of activities that already ex-
Ist and an assesswent of what posit,
.On$ are Open in the market and
MaY Pro -tide opportiinitiez for redevelopment in 'he Triangle area.
The =,sultant wijl also commit that amount of time, up to the
budget established for this task, needed to update, field check,
map or further ref-ir.e other data identified or the review meeting
Corlultan"s in pial;,ning, Zoning, Develnpmefit Econorric*, and �_an.OsCape Arohitectire
Chicago, Illinois Madison, Wisconsin Indianapolis, Indiana Orlando, Florida
FROM --R11PCS- T0 x'.03
a
CaMMS 411 S. Wells, Chicago, Illi,lois60607 (312) 922-9211
NoTX-AW, T-T-T-,1EFZ—Mv
,his work order is for consulting services to be provided by
r7am.iros Ltd., in accordance with the AGREEMEN"' be* tity of
Mount Prospect, Illinois and (�Lr.--zos, Ltd. d.t','d frITU .1he --
WORK ORDER NUMBER: 2
ASSIGNMENT: Downtown Area Consumer Survey
SERVICES TO BE PERFORMED: The consultant shall 'prepare a draft
survey to assess how Mount Prospect residents utilize the downtown
commercial district. The Village will review the survey to ensure
that all questions and possible answers reflect the residents
(i.e., -'-n.ccme) and shopping opportunities (i.e., popular stores)
in and around Mount Prospect, The consultant will then design and
layout a four page return mail Survey form. Consultant will print
2500 surveys to he distributed by the village, to residences
within -3 one mile radiuz of the Village downtown. The consultant
will tabulate the survey and present findings to the Village in
the form of a written memorandum.
COST ESTIMATE! $4,200
SUBMITTED: DATE;
(To be completed by the VILLAGE)
COMMENTS:
110 BE- Q"UN LT-WCE 6MAPti�J- LIX'JILa? To DNS, /lAiLt
n-
AP11ROV2D BY:_
DATE: �k4l- 11 Ab
Corvillan's;n r Iann,ng, Zoring. DevietOprn?M Econo-Mard Lardsoape Architecture
Chicago, Illinois - Madison, Wisconsin Orlando, Florida
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Superintendent of Water & Sewer
DATE: July 24, 1990
SUBJECT: Leak Detection Equipment Upgrade
7= CM USA
In 1982, the Village purchased a complete water main and service
line leak detection system from Fluid Conservation Systems at a
total cost of $39,000. At that time, we implemented an exten-
sive leak locating program that reduced our combined unavoid-
able/unaccounted-for flows from 16.1% in 1982 to 12.5% in 1985.
In May 1986, the Village upgraded our leak detection equipment
with the purchase of a Series 2000 correlator and an improved
radio telemetry system from Fluid Conservation Systems. With
the purchase of this improved equipment, our combined unavoid-
able/unaccounted-for flow was reduced from 12.5% in 1985 to 5.4%
in December 1989. During the eight years of our leak detection
program, we have reduced our water leaks by nearly 11%, saving
approximately 176 million gallons of water, or the potential
loss of $255,000 in revenues, based on the average water rate of
$1.85/M over the past eight years.
The terms of our Lake Michigan allocation permit stipulate that
we must maintain a maximum of 8% unaccounted-for water loss
throughout our water distribution system. This means that a
perpetual leak locating program must be maintained to continual-
ly find and repair undetected water leaks on our aging system.
In order to keep pace with these requirements, we have included
funds in the 1990-91 budget to purchase upgraded leak detection
equipment. The state-of-the-art has improved substantially over
the past four years. There are now more sophisticated MP90
preamplifiers and highly sensitive transducers and hydrophones,
along with an improved radio telemetry system which connects to
the correlator. This upgraded equipment will help to enhance
our leak locating abilities and will make it possible for us to
pinpoint low-energy level leaks. The improved equipment also
has a longer pipe span coefficient and provides new pinpointing
solutions for nonmetallic and larger -diameter pipes.
In order to upgrade our current system, it is my recommendation
to purchase, from Fluid Conservation Systems, two MP90
preamplifiers with 50X transducers and hydrophones, complete
with a customer support program. We will retain the main por-
tion of the equipment that was purchased in May 1986. That
equipment has more than paid for itself over the past eight
years, and I feel that the new, upgraded equipment will surpass
the performance of the old.
I request that the Village Board waive the customary bidding
process and authorize the purchase of two MP90 preamplifiers
with 50X transducers and hydrophones, along with a customer
support program, from Fluid Conservation Systems of Austin TX
for an amount of $15,825. Funding for this proposed purchase
can be found on page 179, account No. 41-072-05-8034 of the
1990-91 budget where there is $16,000 allocated for this pro-
posed purchase.
4rry W.J McIntosh
ter/SeWer Superintendent
CONCUR: Weeks
Director Public Works
J'WM/td
attach. (FCS quote)
WATER/LEAKDETE.CTN
♦LU$0ta SCAVA"ONararers
Mr. Glen Andler
Deputy Public Works Director
Village of Mt. Prospect
1700 W. Central Road
Mt. Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mr. Andler:
Pursuant to our conversation last week, I am encouraged to hear that the MP90
Preamp Upgrade has been approved. I am providing you with price confirmation
on the MP90 Preamps and the Customer Support Program (CSP) for your review.
1990 PRICING
1990 Pricing with
Products and Services Qty- Pricing CSP Discount Savings
MP90 Preamps with SOX 2 $ 15,350 $ 13,450 $ 1,900
Transducers and
Hydrophones
Customer Support Program * 1 $ 2375 $ 2,375 --
$ 17,725 $ 155,825 $ 1,900
* As a result of participating in this program and after the purchase of the
MP90 Preamps, all accessories purchased throughout the terms of this plan
will be discounted by 15%.
Delivery is F.O.B. Austin, Texas. Pricing is valid for 45 days.
Enclosed is an outline of the pricing on the Customer Support Program. Should
you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call me.
Sincerely,
FLUID CONSERVATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
Rhonda L. Quick
Marketing Representative
RLQ:tlw
Enclosure
8834 CAPITAL OF TEXAS HIGHWAY NORTH * SUITE 220 * AUSTIN, TEXAS 78759 USA
Tel. (512) 794.0222 * FAX (512) 794-8686 * Telex 9102900003
FLUID CONSERVATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
AUSTIN, TEXAS
Listed below is pricing for the Customer Support Program to include the
Accessory Component Procurement Plan and Equipment Evaluation.
Prooram Dewcriptim 1Ok y jr Lcim
Electronic Component Maintenance Man $ 1°825
Accessory Component Procurement Plan 225
(Option 3) *
Equipment Evaluation 325_
Savings on MP90 Purchase'
Actual Cost of CSP » p'o
* This pricing includes the required inspection and recalibration of the
electronic components (i.e., C8000° L100'm, and Radios prior to covering
equipment under the CSP). Any repair costs incurred are the customer's
FLUID CONSERVATION SYSTEMS CORPORATION
6 * ftjQ#j*11V*2
Fluid Conservation Systems is pleased to announce the Customer Support Program (CSP).
The CSP has three key features. The base agreement provides a complete maintenance and
repair program for your LEAK DETECTION SYSTEM and includes annual calibration and a
preventive maintenance check by skilled FCS technicians. The two optional features provide
for planned procurement of SYSTEM ACCESSORIES and CONTINUING EDUCATION
COURSES. Below you will find a brief summary of the features and benefits to the attached
CSP agreement.
Features
MAINTENANCE PLAN
Electronic Component Inspection
and Calibration
Repair or Replacement of
"Failing Electronic Components"
Reduced Rates on Loaner Equipment
Preplanned Acquisition of
Accessory Components
Acquisition of Accessory
Components at Reduced Prices
Additional Price Reduction for
Transducer Replacements
Acquisition of Newly Announced
Components or Features at Reduced
Prices
Preplanned Acquisition of Training
Courses
Acquisition of Customer Training
at Reduced Prices
Procurement of Newly Announced
Training Courses at Reduced Prices
Benefits
Provides for annual maintenance checks
and:calibration.on each unit under
contract, ensuring the best equipment
performance and accuracy.
Ensures proper equipment maintenance
which provides optimum operating
performance.
Provides loaner equipment to customers at
reduced rates.
Preapproved funds eliminate procurement
delays.
Cost effective purchasing.
Cost effective replacement of transducers
and components.
0 ortunity to acquire new products with
O
additional savings.
Preapproved funds eliminate procurement
delays.
Cost effective purchasing.
Opportunity to acquire new training
courses with additional savings.
Village of f .aunt Prospect
-Mount Prospect, Illinois
6
AN
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM'"
TO: MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: JOBN FULTON DIXON,
VILLAGE MANAGER
RE: PUBLIC WORKS LABOR CONTRACT
DATE: AUGUST 3, 1990
On the agenda this evening is a request for the Board to authorize signature of the labor
contract with Local 11 SEIU, Public Works Union.
Members of the local union met and voted 26 to 8 to accept the contract as presented..
That contract is presently being typed and drafted according to the mark-up of the
contract that was sent out to you earlier last week.
We are requesting authorization for the President to sign and the Clerk to attest the
contract for a 3 year term granting salary and other benefits to the members of the
Public Works Department.
I would hasten to add that there are many in -roads in this contract that we have been
striving to obtain for quite some time, in particular, we have approached the salary
schedule by giving cents per hour as opposed to a flat per hour percentage increase. In
addition we have an agreement with the first, union to increase the payment that
employees will make for health care expenses.
All these advantages were obtained by not having any of the management rights
languages taken out of the contract and well within the dollar perimeters established by
the Board.
JOHN FULTON DIXON
VILLAGE MANAGER
JFD/caf
Village of w,.cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois 0
r
&I
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM r LE Y
TO: Village Manager
FROM: EngineeringCoordinator
DATE: August 2, 1990
SUBJECT: 1990 SHARED COST SIDEWALK CONTRACT
On June 19, 1990, the Village Board awarded the contract to
A. Lamp Construction Co.
When the contract documents were made up an error was made in
establishing quantities. This error was that the quantities listed
in the contract were a "to -date" amount. That is, when the
contract was let out for bids on May 30th, we had received applica-
tions from residents for 14,000 S.F. of sidewalk. The quantity -
that should have been listed would be a total similar to our 1989
contract which was for 26,000 S.F. of sidewalk.
A. Lamp Construction',s contract total is for $39,369.00 based
on 14,000 square feet of sidewalk. The 1989 contract was about
$53,000.
1990 budget amounts are:
Page 152 Acct: 1-071-04-8302 Shared Cost Walk $50,000
Acct: 1-071-04-8301 New Walk Const. $30,000
. From these budgeted amounts, it is evident that this error is
easily corrected by increasing the amount of the contract awarded
to A. Lamp Construction.
I am requesting that the contract be extended to a not to
exceed $55,000 amount. It would be broken down as follows:
Shared Cost walk = $39,000
New Walk Construction = $16,000
A. Lamp Construction has agreed to perform the additional work
at their contract unit prices.
Robert Pszanka
Page 2
1990 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program
I concur with the above request
4
Charles Bencic
Director of Inspection Services
I concur with the above request
Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
RP/m
Mount',,-rospect Public Works Lpartmont
*I INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7M MY LU
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works ILm
DATE: August 3, 1990
P
SUBJ: Water Main Replacement Y
On April 17, 1990, the Village Board approved a contract to
Glenbrook Excavating in the amount of $124,390 for replacement
of two segments of water main. One was on Council Trail between
83 and HiLusi and the second one was on Oak St. between Gregory
and Forest. Both of these jobs have been completed, however,
there were some unexpected problems with soils that required
additional trench backfill and pavement replacement.
Our consulting engineer, Beling Consultants and I met with the
contractor regarding cost overruns. It is recommended that
authorization be given to increase the amount of the contract
not to exceed $4,865.00.
�c� LkQ—Lki 6r"W'J�
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/eh