Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3775_001
`Next ordinance No. 4205 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Next Resolution No. 32-90 1 '11w i S111 �a AWNWAMMUMUM A G E N D A JULY 17, 1990 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D E R 0 F B U 8 1 N E 8 a REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting Date and Time: Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday Senior Citizen Center July 17, 1990 50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M. Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER Ii. ROLL CALL Mayor Gerald "Skip'' Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg III. INVOCATION - Trustee Arthur IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, July 3, 1990 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT V1. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD A. Presentation of Trophies for Best Float in the 1990 July 4th Parade: First Place: Mount Prospect Rotary Club Second Place: Daily Herald Third Place: Mount Prospect Girl Scouts of American B. Presentation of Tom Abrams Trophy for Community Involvement to Jack Keefer V11- MAYORIS REPORT A. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES) OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance creates a Class 11R11 liquor license for Dragon City Restaurant, and a Class "C" liquor license for a retail packaged goods store, both businesses located in the Brentwood Square Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads. B. lst reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 (ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES) OF THE VILLAGE CODE This Ordinance creates a Class 11R11 liquor license for the 2nd Giordano's Restaurant, to be located at Algonquin and Elmhurst Roads. C. Mount Prospect 75th Anniversary Committee Status Report (Exhibit A) (Exhibit B) VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church 1400 East Kensington Road 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH, LOCATED AT 1400 EAST KENSINGTON ROAD Discussion on this Ordinance has been deferred to the August 7th meeting of the Village Board. B. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT (443 East Rand Road) Discussion on this Ordinance has been deferred to the August 7th meeting of the Village Board. C. ZBA 38 -SU -90 and ZBA 39-V-90, 1200-1380 S. Elmhurst Road 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2414 GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WITHIN HUNTINGTON COMMONS AND GRANTING A VARIATION This Ordinance amends the Huntington Commons Planned Unit Development to allow 86 garages in the Huntington Square Apartment on Elmhurst Road. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit C) D. ZBA 41-V-90, 2016 Hopi Lane 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING 'VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2016 HOPI LANE This Ordinance grants a variation to permit replacing a circular driveway and to allow a 40% impervious lot surface coverage, rather than the permitted 45%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit D) E. ZBA 42-V-90, 107 West Orchard Place 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 107 ORCHARD PLACE This Ordinance grants a variation to replace an existing driveway 16.5 feet wide and to permit a 1.5 foot side yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit E) F. ZBA 43-V-90, 203 North Russel 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 203 NORTH RUSSEL This Ordinance grants variations to allow a 1.681 side yard setback and a 31 rear yard setback for a new garage and to allow an impervious lot surface coverage of 47.5%, rather than the permitted 35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests. (Exhibit F) IX. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 47-V-90, 1727 Bonita The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit a driveway 29 feet wide and a service walk 8 feet wide. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. B. ZBA 49 -SU -90 and ZBA 50-V-90, 1420 W. Lincoln Street The Petitioner is requesting a special use to permit a 3 car garage; and variations to permit a driveway 30 feet in width. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. C. ZBA 51-Z-90 and ZBA 52 -SU -90, 1920 W. Golf Road The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from R -X to R-1, Single Family Residence District, and a a Special Use to allow an R-1 Planned Unit Development far four single family homes. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by votes of 6-0. D. Accept public and/or private improvements: 1. Chapman Subdivision, Lonnquist & Elmhurst 2. Certain ponds within Kensington Center for Business 3. Chicago Assembly of God Church, East Golf Road X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT A. Bids: 1. Fire Department Hose 2. Fire Department Clothing 3. Fire Department Turn Out Gear B. Request to accept leaf disposal proposal. C. Status Report XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS XII. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND'BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JULY 3, 1990 CALL TO ORDER $516,880 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. 22,401 ROLL CALL 11,155 Motor Equipment Pool Fund Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Trustee Mark Busse 37,544 Trustee Timothy Corcoran P.W. Facility Construction Fund A Trustee Leo Floros - Trustee George Van Geem Special service Area Const. #5 Trustee Theodore Wattenberg - Absent: Trustee Ralph Arthur Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) INVOCATION Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - The invocation was given by Trustee Floros. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Escrow Deposit Fund 14,176 Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved APPROVE to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of MINUTES the Mayor and Board of Trustees held June 19, 1990. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Pass: Wattenberg Motion carried. APPROVAL OF BILLS Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $516,880 Motor Fuel Tax Fund - Community Development Block Grant Fund 22,401 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 11,155 Motor Equipment Pool Fund 17,615 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 81,940 Parking System Revenue Fund 37,544 Risk Management Fund 57,356 P.W. Facility Construction Fund A - P.W. Facility Construction Fund B - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 6,009 Special service Area Const. #5 - Special service Area Const. #6 - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) - Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - Debt Service Funds - Flexcomp Trust Fund 6,598 Escrow Deposit Fund 14,176 Police Pension Fund 43,464 Firemen's Pension Fund 43,279 Benefit Trust Fund - $858,417 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: Wattenberg Motion carried. Trustee Wattenberg explained that he could not support payment of the bills because he has no way of knowing if they are correct and didn't want to be held liable. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD Don Harmon, 16 North William, stated that he hasn't BUSSE received a response from the Village Manager regarding SCHOOL N Page 2 July 3, 1990 his question as to how the Suzuki School of Music can conduct a business in the former Busse School building which is zoned R-1, Residential District. He also stated that the parking pad on the property has not yet been striped, as instructed several months ago. Mayor Farley responded that a response will be forthcoming. MAYOR'S REPORT CLASS "R" A request for a Class "R" liquor license was presented LIQUOR LICENSE for a Chinese Restaurant', to be known as Dragon City, BRENTWOOD located withinthe Brentwood Shopping Center, Wolf & SHOPPING CENTER Kensington Roads. DRAGON CITY Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to authorize the creation of a Class "R" liquor license for Dragon City. Upon roll call: Ayes: .Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented July 17th for first reading. CLASS "C" A request was presented for a Class "C" liquor license LIQUOR LICENSE for a retail packaged liquor store, approximately 5,000 BRENTWOOD square feet in size, to be located in the Brentwood SHOPPING CENTER Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads. It was noted that this establishment will also offer delivery. UNITED LIQUOR The Petitioner stated that all laws will be enforced MART relative to serving to minors both in the store and as part of the delivery service. Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to authorize the creation of a Class "C" liquor license for a packaged liquor store, known as United Liquor Mart. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented July 17th for first reading. APPOINTMENT: Mayor Farley requested concurrence with the appointment CONSTITUTION of Janice Farley to the Constitution Bi -Centennial BI CENTENNIAL Commission, to fill the position vacated by Rachel COMMISSION Toepppen. JANICE FARLEY Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to concur with the appointment of Janice Farley to the Constitution Bi -Centennial Commission. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS ZBA 31-V-90 ZBA 31-V=90, Northwest Assembly of God Church NORTHWEST 1400 East Kensington Road ASSEMBLY OF GOD An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would Page 2 July 3, 1990 grant variations from the parking standards to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 588 to 512, to permit a lot coverage of 61%, rather than the permitted 35%, and a variation to permit a building height of 40 feet, rather than the permitted 28 feet. The Zoning Board voted 2 -for approval and 5 to deny, resulting in,a recommendation to deny these requests. Trustee Corcoran asked Gregory Gann, attorney for the Petitioner, the status of negotiations with the River Trails Park District relative to swapping the strip of land between the existing site of the church and the proposed site., Mr. Gann stated that both parties are talking about the possible property trade but no decision has been made at this point. Trustee Corcoran asked that further consideration of the proposed ordinance be deferred until August 7 in order to give the Petitioner and the Park District time to negotiate the land swap. Trustee Corcoran noted that if the land swap is approved the entire scope of the project would be changed. Mr. Gann stated that he would like to proceed with the request since the church would like to know that they could proceed if the land swap was unsuccessful. Ron Alfarvic, resident, expressed his concern that the Petitioner would expand the proposed sanctuary from the 1,400 seat capacity established by the Board to the desired capacity of 2,000 seats. Mayor Farley explained that the proposed Ordinance provides for a sanctuary with a seating capacity of 1,400 and if the Petitioner wants to expand a public hearing before the Zoning Board of Appeals and the Village Board would be required. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to defer further discussion of the Ordinance granting variations to the Northwest Assembly of God Church on the proposed site until the August 7th meeting of the Village Board. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran Nays: Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg, Farley Motion failed. (A motion was passed later in the meeting deferring further consideration of ZBA 31-V-90 to the August 7th meeting due to the fact that Trustees Corcoran and Van Geem will be absent on July 17th.) An Ordinance was presented for 2nd reading that would AMEND CH.18 amend Chapter 18 (Traffic) of the Village Code to BOXWOOD DR. establish Boxwood Drive as a one-way street, northerly bound, and related STOP signage. James Norman, 1068A Boxwood Drive, stated that there is a problem in the area with certain residents who loiter and display inappropriate behavior in public. Mayor Farley stated that the problem appears to be that of a social problem, rather than a problem pertinent to the proposed Ordinance and suggested Mr. Norman meet with the Police Chief and Village Manager in an attempt to resolve the neighborhood problems. Page 3 - July 3, 1990 Nancy Johnson, 1108A Boxwood Drive, stated that many meetings have been held between the neighborhood groups and the Village and the proposed amendment to the Traffic Code will benefit the area; she also indicated her support of the Ordinance'. ORD.NO. 4204 Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4204 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: 'Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS ZBA 38 -SU -90 ZBA 38 -SU -90 and ZBA 39-V-90, 1.200-1380 S. Elmhurst Vd. ZBA 39-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting'an amendment to the 1200 S. ELMHURST Huntington commons Planned Unit Development to red ce the number of parking spaces for the apartments to 504 spaces in order to constructgarages. Also requested. is a variation to permit a 9-1/2 foot side yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. The Petitioner explained that the proposed garages would back up to the Commonwealth Edison easement. The garages would be construction of face brick on all 4 sides. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the amendment to the Huntington Commons Planned Unit Development requested in ZBA 38 - SU -90 and ,grant the size yard variation requested in ZBA 39-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the July 17th meeting of the Village Board. ZBA 41-V-90 ZBA 41-V-90, 2016 Hopi Lane` 2016 HOPI LANE The Petitioner 'is requesting a variation to allow a 40% impervious lot surface coverage, rather than the permitted 35, in order to replace an existing circular driveway. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the request being the subject of ZBA 41-V-90, Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 41-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None' Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at the July 17th meeting of the Village Board. Page 4 —July 3, 1990 ZBA 42-V-90, 107 West Orchard Place ZBA 42-V-90 The Petitioner is requesting a variation to permit a 107 ORCHARD driveway 16.5 feet wide and to permit a side yard setback of 1.5 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. It was noted.that it is the intention of the Petitioner to replace an existing driveway. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 42-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented July 17th for first reading. ZBA 43-V-90, 203 North Russel ZBA 43 -V -P The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a 203 RUSSE side yard setback of 1.681,'a 31 rear yard setback, and an impervious lot surface coverage of 47.5%, instead of the permitted 45% in order to construct a garage. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the side yard setback and impervious lot coverage by a vote of 5-1 and grant a 3 foot rear yard setback by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variations requested in ZBA 43-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. An Ordinance will be presented July 17th for first reading. An Ordinance was presented for first reading that SELL VILLAGE would authorize the sale of real estate owned by OWNED PROPERTY the Village of Mount Prospect at 443 West Rand Road. 443 W. RAND RD. It was noted that this parcel of land, 691 x 1251, was acquired as part of the Prospect Meadows Water System, being the former well house. Village Manager Dixon proposed selling the lot due to the fact that he has received inquiries from interested parties and stated that the Village has no useful purpose for•the parcel. Jane Conrad, 1002 North Prospect Manor, questioned why the Village is declaring this parcel surplus. She noted that there is a Restrictive Covenant on the land restricting any development to residential. It was her opinion that the owner of Francis Cadillac would purchase the property and asked how that lot could be used. She also noted that if that property was purchased with the intent of expanding the Cadillac dealership, it would have to be re -zoned and if that did happen it would affect the property values of the single family homes in the area. Page 5 - July 3, 1990 Mrs. Conrad also stated that since the residents in the area are being 'taxed for the acquisition of the Prospect Meadows Water System,created by the Village's Special Service Area No.1, the subject parcel should be considered part of that Area., retained as open space and not to be sold by the Village. Trustee Corcoran asked why this item was presented as the first reading of an Ordinance since it had not been discussed by the Village Board at a prior meeting, and stated that he felt the 'proposed 'sale of this parcel was moving too quickly without all the facts and circumstances of the land known.' it was noted that the Village Manager brought this subject to the attention of the Village Board at the Committee of the Whole meeting, noting that parties .had expressed interest in buying the land and that. an Ordinance would be presented at this meeting for first reading. Trustee Corcoran also asked if the proceeds received for such a sale would go to the homeowners or appl'ed against the outstanding amount in the Special SerTe Area. The Village Manager was directed to obtain a legal opinion' responding to the question of whether the lot could be sold and the effect of the Restrictive Covenant on this lot. The Ordinance presented established the method of selling this parcel through sealed bids following advertisement of the lot for sale in the Mount Prospect Herald for three consecutive weeks. The bids will be opened at'a regular meeting of the Village Board. Trustee Corcoran made a motion to defer this item and delay the first reading of this Ordinance until July 17th. This motion failed due to lack of a second. This Ordinance will be presented July 17th for second reading. (A motion was passed later in this meeting deferring consideration of this Ordinance until August 7th, due to the fact that Trustees Corcoran and Van Geem will be out of town on July 17th.) VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT BIDS: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the following bid results for 5 self contained breathing SELF-CONTAINED apparatus for the Fire Department: BREATHING APPARATUS Bidder Amount Air One $11,350.00 Mac Fire & Safety $12,395.00 Mine Safety Appliance - $13,071.75 Interstate of Milwaukee $15,264.50 AIR ONE Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenb rg, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and 'accept the low bid submitted by Air One for five (a) MSA self contained breathing apparatus with spare tanks and brackets in the amount not to exceed $11,350.00. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse,` Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. Page 6 - July 3, 1990 The following bid was received for the purchase of PARKING FEE eight (8) parking fee collection boxes: COLLECTION Hall parking lot: BOXES, Bidder Amoun Southern Specialties Corporation $11,303.20 Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, SOUTHERN moved to concur with the recommendation of the SPECIALTIES administration and accept the bid submitted by CORP. Southern Specialties Corporation for eight (8) collection boxes in an amount not to exceed $11,303.20. Upon roll call: Ayes: Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Kays: None Pass: Busse Motion carried. The following bid was received for the removal of REMOVE of an underground fuel tank located in the Village FUEL TANK11 Hall parking lot: Bidder Amount Peter J. Hartmann Company $8,200.00 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, PETER J. moved to concur with the recommendation of the HARTMANN CO administration and accept the bid received from Peter J. Hartmann for the removal of an underground fuel tank,located within the Village Hall parking lot in an amount not to exceed $8,200.00. Upon roll.call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg Kays: None Motion carried. village Manager Dixon presented two quotes received CABLE TV for the maintenance and repair of the Cable T.V. EQUIPMENT equipment. Mr. Dixon stated that the quote from MAINTENANCE Swiderski for $4,199 appears to be lower than that submitted by ROSCOR in the amount of $4,200, however the ROSCOR quote provides several additional options, therefore he and the Cable T.V. Coordinator recommend accepting the quote from ROSCOR. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, ROSCOR moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the quote submitted by ROSCOR in an amount not to exceed $4,200 for the repair and maintenance of the Cable T.V. equipment. Upon roll call: Ayesi Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Kays: None Motion carried. Mr. Dixon presented a request to authorize the Busse LITIGATION: Road Disconnect Suit to be appealed to the Illinois BUSSE ROAD Supreme Court. DISCONNECT SUIT Page 7 - July 3, 1990 Trustee Wattenberg stated that he would like a second opinion from an attorney as to whether the Village should appeal this case as proposed. Trustee -Corcoran, - seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to authorize Special Counsel to appeal the Busse Road Disconnect Suit to the Illinois Supreme Court. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, . Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. GEORGE/ALBERT Village Manager Dixon presented a request for the final IMPROVEMENT payout for the George/Albert reconstruction project. It was noted that the construction engineers retained by the Village for this. project, Baxter and Woodman Engineers, were required,to devote more expertise than originally anticipated, resulting in an agreed amount of $11,467.00 more than the original contract. BAXTER & WOODMAN Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, Jed ENGINEERS to - concur with the recommendation of the Village Manager and authorize a final payout of $11,467 to Baxter and Woodman Engineers for the George/Albert reconstruction project. Page 8 - July 3, 1990 Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Wattenberg Nays: Van Geem Motion carried. MELAS PARK Mr. Dixon stated that a proposed Agreement for Melas Park has been received, however, it did not address many of the issues the Village feels should have been included and asked permission for staff to draft an Agreement acceptable to the Village. Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to concur with the request of the Village Manager and authorize Village staff to draft an Agreement for the development and use of Melas Park. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. PACE RT.403 The Village Manager informed the Board that due to the low usage, Pace bus route 403 will probably be discontinued. This route provides service from the train station to the Colony Apartments at Oakton Street, and points in between. Mr. Dixon stated that Pace will conduct a hearing on the proposed discontinuation of this bus route at the Mount Prospect Public Library on July 24th. HERB WEEKS Mr. Dixon displayed a copy of the July, 1990 Public HONORED Works Magazine, distributed nationally, which features Herb Weeks, Director of Public works, on the cover. The article honors Mr. Weeks for being the recipient of the Salt Institute's Excellence in Storage Award. COW - 7/10 Mr. Dixon stated that inasmuch as there are no items CANCELLED ready to be presented to the Village Board as a Committee of the Whole, he suggested the meeting on July 10th be cancelled. Page 8 - July 3, 1990 ANY OTHER BUSINESS A request was presented to accept the public ACCEPT improvements in conjunction with the Chapman PUBLIC subdivision,.single family homes at Lonnquist IMPROVEMENTS Blvd and Elmhurst Road. CHAPMAN SUB. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to accept the public improvements installed in conjunction with the Chapman Subdivision. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. A request was presented to accept the public KENSINGTON improvements in conjunction with the light industrial CENTER FOR development at Kingston Court and Feehanville Drive, BUSINESS: located within the Kensington Center for Business. KINGSTON J. Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to accept the public improvements installed in conjunction with the development at Kingston Court and Feehanville Drive. upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg Nays: None Motion carried. It was announced that the weather channel on Cable TV is off due to the fact that Marseilles has equipment breakdown and has asked the subscribing TV companies to share the cost of repair or replacement. TCI has expressed their reluctance to share that cost. Trustee Van Geem announced that he will be out of town for the next regular meeting of the Village Board on July 17th. Trustee Corcoran stated that he too would be out of town for that meeting. Mayor Farley stated that since several important issues will be presented at the next meeting and there will not be a full Board in attendance, a motion to defer specified items until the regular meeting of August 7, would be in order. Trustee van Geem, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to defer discussion on the following items to the regular meeting of the Village Board on August 7th: An Ordinance granting variation's for property located at 1400 East Kensington Road, commonly -known as Northwest Assembly of God, An Ordinance authorizing the sale of real property owned by the Village located at 443 East Rand Road, and ratification of the salary increase granted to the Village Manager. Upon roll call: Ayes: Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Nays: Wattenberg Motion carried. Page 9 - July 3, 1990 ADJOURNMENT Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Van Geer, moved to adjourn the meeting. Upon roll call; Ayes; Unanimous Motion carried. The meeting was adjourned at 10;09 P.M. Carol A. Fields Village Clerk Page 10 - July 3, 1990 General & Special Revenue Funds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund Motor Equipment Pool Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 Debt Service Fund Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION July 12, 1990 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 6/29/90 through Per Attached Journal Balance 6/29/90 7/12/90 List of Bills Entry 7/12!90 $ 3,373,429 $156,905 $ 568,742 $<50,000> $ 2,911,592 719,380 7,839 300,604 426,615 5,900 10,000 10,141 5,759 60,374 7,885 59,857 8,402 3,571,642 175,857 377,174 3,370,325 230,525 3,649 5,890 228,284 1,315,370 23,031 76,967 1,261,434 385 - 44,412 50,000 5,973 737,039 1,791 139 738,691 140,472 1,742 1,525 140,689 935,907 14,935 172,127 778,715 4,661 3,531 5,025 3,167 1,408,729 11,098 16,351 1,403,476 14,666,539 13,435 - 14,679,974 16,584,471 12,829 - 16,597,300 261,569 2,167 259,402 $44,016,392 $444,527 $1,641,121 $42,81, 9,798 VILLAGE OF AOUNT PROSPECT PAGE i ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 7112190 VENDOR PURCHASE OESCRIPTIUN INVGICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS A C T CUNSTRUCTIUN BOND R&PUNU m1u0.00 $100.00 ADVANLEO COMMAND SYSTEMS PROGRAMMING SERVICES $3UO.00 $300.00 ALL AROUND CONSTRUCTION BOND Rb UND $100.00 510u.U6 LENAKT ANUERSiJN BOND kEizUND $ 100.00 5100.00 PAT ANDERSON CONST. CO. BOND REFUND $100.06 510u.0i;, AXA CONSTRUCTION BOND REFUND $100.00 T10tl.uo SCOTT BALLER RESIDENT R/E TR TAX RE,3,ATE $270.00 $270.00 BEELER CONSTRUCTION BUND REFUND $220.00 BOND REFUND $loo. OU S320.06 6 BISHOP PLUMBING COMPANY BOND REFUND $100.00 $1Diu.s3 MICHAEL J. BORUTA RESIuENT RIE TR TAX REt3ATE $320.00 >_ 2 .?,u CITIUANKI N.A. PMT OF INS CLAIMS-GAcs $91559.70 ?,509.70: CLERK OF THE LIRCUIT COURT PMT PIR 711219G $224.25 $224.25 TERESA CONWAY BOND REFUND $75.00 57t).0 CUSHMAN E WAKEFIELD 'AATtk 3ILL REFU'+D $11436.93 WATER BILL REFUND $153.26 $11650.19 DE bARTULA CONST. !3OND REFUND $75.00 $75.u0 OISSUASEMENT ACCOUNT P1k EiVUllgG 5131190 $5087.92 x PAYROLL ENDING JULY i21 1990 511269.30 PAYROLL ENDING JULY 121 1.990 $35.521.97 , PAYROLL ENDING JULY 121 1990 $4051921.04 PAYROLL ENDING JULY 12Y 1990 $473.88 5448,#774.11 DON OHUE 6 ASSOCIATES,, INC. SERVICES RENDERED 51173Z.80 SERVICES RENDERED $21145.42 SERVICES RENDERED 521582.45 $614ti0.4D7 DOYLE SIGNS* INC BOND REFUND $100.00 BOND REFUND $100.00 $200.00 ENTEiNMANN-ROVIN CU. BADGES 5290.00 5290.00 FIRST NAT'L BANK OF MT. PROS. DUE TU FED DEP PAY 6128190 $101794.02 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6128190 $147.It8 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6128/90 $36.25 , DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6128190 $21730.57 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6/28%90 $809.51 $141517.83* FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS MEDICAL FENEFIT REIMS $41381.31 UEPENDENT CARE REIMS $644.01 $51025.31* FLUSH SEWER BOND REFUND $95.06 $95.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PACE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT Pj\YMENT DATE 7/IZ/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTICil lk\VCICE AMOU'Nr T(ITAt CLEARING ACCOUNTS G & S BUIL9ERS 30NO R!:FUNO E100.00 $Iou.uo GEISE:k-3ERNER 6JNO REFUND SIOU.00 sloo.tij PATkICK J. HAMANi 80NIRt:FUNO $75.00 $75.00 NARAIN V. HINGORANI REFUND kEAL 'STATE TRANS TAX $384.00 $384.00 ILLL14UI:i MUNICIPAL izETIREMENT EMPLOYE- SHAi2E-JUNE 1990 $14017.71 EMPLOYER SHARE -JUNG 1990 $341I44.87 S491062.5i ANDREA JUSZCZYK PMT P/R 7/12/90 $254.01 $254.00 KUPKE CONSTRUCTION 3OND REFUND $100.001 5106#00 CARL KRAFT REFUND FINAL BILL $9.12 REFUND FINAL BILL 5.88 slu.4.iQ DAVID LIN REFUNU FINAL BILL $.8B REFUND FINAL BILL $9.12 $10.00 MAC'S FOOD & GRILL REFUND DUPLICATE PMT $125.00 5125.1.)0 DAVY MCKEE CORP. BUND REFUND 5500.06 $500.00 MCLA,ij INC. REFUND FEE $2v422.43 5Zt422.48 JOHN MERGUUPIS WATLi-, S27.31b WA TE k $2.64 0 . 0 0 WARREN Mc-TZDORFF REFU;4D FINAL WATER BILL $8.37 REFUj40 FINAL WATER BILL S.88 sv.Z5 GUS MITSIUS BOND Rl---r-UNO S1010.00 $IC)Uoj KEVIN A. MOORE BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 MUSIC STARTS HERE BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.Uf NURMANDALc PROPERTIES 13OND REFUND sIucj.ou BOND REFUND $100.00 $20u.Ou NORTiiWEsT MENTAL HEALTH CENTER FINAL PMT-f-,UDGET ALLOCATION 1375#00 $375.00 MARIE J. U*MALLEY BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 OLYMPIC SIGNS, INC. 8OND Ro:UNL) $100.00 $100.00 OPUS $OND RtFUN0 5445.00 BOND RECFUNU $81000.00 f 8 f 4,Lt 5. Of) PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. AISL EXPENSE_S 360. 0',.) $66.00* Pi(-KkilCK COMMONS WEST ASSOC. BOND R-�FUND $500.00 $500.00 PIERCE BUILDERS L30NO R F U NO $75.00 $75.00 BETTY REIGER 80 NO R FUND $10U.00 51011.00 RMRS SYSTEM PO STA'Gt METER 01- POSIT $3,9060.OU t3qu0u.oQ* A- J. ROGERS & CO. BOND REFUND $100.00 BOND REFUND 8IOU.00 $Zou.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL RcPORT PAYMENT DATE 7112190 VENDJR PUR(:HASE DESCRIPTION IN'VCiCE AMOUiVT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS RICHARD ROTHEISER ±lEFUlifj FINAL BILL $63.84 REFUND FINAL JILL S6..16 S7U.00 ROYAL FUEL LIQUID ENERGIES INC FUcL $8,573.20 S8#573.20- DERRICK SMITH BOND Rti=jJNu $25.00 SL5.00 W. STACHJRA BOND REFUND $75.00 S75.vt. D. E. SWANSON KEFU'JU FINAL BILL 54.35 REFUND FINAL BILL x.44 $5.00 C. THEOBOLD BOND REFUND $100.00 $IUU.00 TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS# L CENTIcA.L RD IMPROVEMENT $139.51 $139.50 TURK ELECTRIC SIGN CO. aON0 REFUNij 375.Du SSi5.00 UNITED VISUAL: INC. EQUIPMEiT $923.00 EOUI P M-'J T $41. UO EQUIPMc'!T i51.3U $l.0-15a3G VILLAGE 7F MOUNT PROSPECT WATEK 5!LL ADJUSTMENT 511.66 WATER BILL ADJUSTMENT $121.75 $133.41* VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT RE INSPt(,TION FEE 04775 S�,5.U0 REINSPECTION FEc 04896 $5.Ou REINSPECTION FEE 05147 $25.DO REINSPECTION FEE 08584 $25.03 RE iNSPEC T ION FEE 06933 5280.00 REINSPtCTIJN FEE 07247 $25.OU REII4SPECTIUN FEE 07288 $25.00 REI.NSPLCTION FEE 07291 325.00 REINSPECTION FEE 07390 $100.00 kEINSPECTIJN FEE 07471 $25.00 REINSPECTION FEE 1147 $25.06 $615.00 VILLAGE SEWER BOND ff_FUND SIOO.00 3OND REFUND $100.0G 52o};.uJ VINCENT SIGN SERVICE BOND REFliNO $100.00 $100.00 VISU-SEXIER CLEAN is SEALS INC. FINAL P'ST-SEWER GROUTING $3x337.99 $3#367.99 CHRISTOPHER WINTERS REFUND FINAL SILL $2.26 REFUND FINAL SILL S.22 CLEAxING ACCOUNTS ***TOT AL*-*: $569#961.27 VILLA(',-- OF "ou%T PROSPECT PALL 4 ACCDUNT`; 1 4YABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 7/12/90 VENDOR VUKCHAaE DESCRIPTION INVCICE AMOUNI T''J AL G'ENEkAL FUND 5427.ZICU.47 CI MMU'` TTY 01EVLP4T 13LOCK GRANT $I*416.78 ILL. MUNIvIPL RETIREMENT FUND 5�4* -F6.u0 kTFz C S--'Ai-:_R F')NU $47*439.I�j PARKING SYSTEM KLVENUE FUND a *':.12.5 3 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $9*559.7i FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND $59025.31 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $16*350.73 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION HUSSt*S FLOWERS & GIFTS FLOa7t-R-S FLOWERS CHICAGO SUBURuA(N TIMES NEWSPAP tTH OF .JULY AD FEDERAL EXPkESS CGRP DELIvt�RY PETTY CASH FINANCE DEPT. MISC Ek-�ENSES PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION GENERAL FUND sJGu.45 VILLAGE MANAGER* S OFFICE IRENE F. BAHR THE HERALD NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL PEDER )EN 6 HOUPT PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT. V E G PRINTERS INC. XEROX CORP. SERVICES RENIaEKED SECRETAKY AD FOR CABLE PU3LIC AT ION SEKVICt KENDEREU MAY 90 MISC EXPENSES NOTE SHLtTS—PIK? MONThLY EQUITY PLAN JULY $75.00 $781.25 $41.50 >1kc.50 5109.00 $109.(r0 $27.50 $27.50 $47.95 'x47.95# *#*TOTAL#43 3. 5% $781.25 $781.25 5268.15 8'1t;.Io $36.x7 536.67 S2*IZ3.53 l4ilZ3.53 s7.85 87.85 $33. 5U 3. 5% 5141. Z7 8141. Z7 VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE ***TOTAL** 53*41 L. 2.3 VILLAGE OF ?COUNT PROSPECT PAGE- 5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLt APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DAT-- 7112190 VENu€JR PUR'mHASE CESCRIPTION INVOICE .A MOUNT T, TAL GENERAL FUND $37412.23 CA6L= TV OPERATIONS ILLINOIS i;ELL TCL: PHONE CO. ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM J. V. JOHNSON & ASSOC. PHYLLIS MOLIERE NATIONAL GUARUTAV SECURITY SEV OFFICE SQUARE PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. ROSLOR CORPORATIuV WALTER SOSIN GABLE TV JPERATIJftiS GENERAL FUND FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTEMPS AMERICAN INST. OF CERTIFIED BUTLER PAPER COMPANY C OMPU TEkLAND DECISION DATA SERVICE INC. CHAkLES R. HARDY L ASSOCIATES I.B.M. CORPORATI_JN 375 ) 3.., S $50.00 150.UU'. SERVICE TO PHONE SYSTEM $9O.0u $90.00 SUPPLIEI $352.94 $75.00 SUPPLIc i $185.85 184.O$: SUPPLICS $165.90 6704.69 C O k PROD CREW $25.Ot s25.�s` i REPAIRS $94.5J i94 -5u OFFICE SUPPLIES 5207..69 '6207.69 MISC EXPc:NSES $15.00 5.,j 0* cQUIPMENT SERVICc CONTRACT $4s20G.0U s4s2,00. o C 0 �* PROD CREW 625.00 $-115:u6 **NOTAL** 55i,4II.8:,j $5v41I.88 TEMP HELP-MOkTELL TEMP Hr-LP-MORTELL ANNUAL DUES-JEPSJN PAPER SERVICE MAINTENANCE SERVICE SERVICES RENUER_J 'ITL, COiPUTERS G PRINTER -JULY MTCE r-G-'PUTERS E PRINTER JULY $434.25 $365.05 $849.30 $70.Uu s7 u.tJ0 $Z1110.82 s2, 1 I-ri.E32v= $75.00 $75.00 $84.Ot 184.O$: $500.00 tt too jo $194.03 $52.u1i $24o.vO VENJUK FINANCE DEPARTMEAT ILLINOIS d_LL TELLPHONE CO. ILLINOIS TELEPHO"ac SERVICE COM NCR C ORPURA TI ON PEOER.EN 4 HOUPT PETTY CASH - FI NA VCE DEPT. PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.. RAFFtRTY UISTRI!3UTJRS XEROX CORP. XLIDATACOMP INC. FINANCE GtPARiMtNT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE CLERK`S OFFICE HEWLETT PACKARD ILLINUIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE MIGHTY MITES AWARDS & SUNS MUNILIPAL CLERKS OF WORTH & NW PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC SCHWAAB• INC. SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE WEST PUBLISHING CO. VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE GLi4ERAL FUrvU VILLAGL OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLc APPROVAL RcPORT PAYMENT DATE 7/12/90 JiR{CHAac DFSCtIPTIlm 573 9 3., S SERVICI: CALL SUPPLItzS JUNG 9J TRAiIiSFc,' TAX MISC EXP_'-NSFS MISC EXPcNSES OFFICE `:UPPLIES PAPth MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN JULY MTCt SERVILE -JULY Slv?i5.67 PAGE 0 INVCICF AMOUNT TSTAL $2:316.79 SZm3ib.79 $479.Z5 $479.25 $ 104.63 $iu4.03 $lbo.0J sj'So.OQ $6.94 # $4.05 slu.9-. 455.94 S:)>.94 $31x3.26 $393.26 S141.Z7 bi41.Z7 4IZ.42 $I[.42 ***TOTAL*,- !�7.6i5.b7 PRINT CARTkIDGES $51.39 $51.39 DIRF-C TJK IES $25.oit $25.66 PLAQUES $250.81 $2.50.01 MEMPIEPS)HlP DUES $15.00 $15.u6 LEGAL PAGE $453.36 $453.35 MISC STAMPS $121.75 $121.75 DELIVERY 523.60 $23.00 IL kE'VISED STATUTES $210.25 IL RLVIStD STATUTES 641Z.30 4012.55 $ i 4 7 J 3.` 6 *=$TOTAL*� $im363.46 #.^ter,"- r r#***"** **4-***Q"'*Vc**#rr"v`n**4.I4t*****i***4iti*********r******It.vl'c*ir********r*************--********##'****** 65'916�LA E;S'4F6�LS #�DVItiI### 24i'7TS 7#'7TS -31W 07'tT£44S ^7'tT£#9% r!L± ZV?}tN33-11wdNhQ OW13?4 OC'na$ 0Z'191 wl 14 T7'£LO*ZS 'IF 61 S iSxh-�dXZ 3c,1W # ?O"OTS S3'�N:3c'X3 3S TW 00'6f,6 £ So 147% S3SN3ctX3 3S TW OO'0£S (-0`Oi"s ZVM3N3N C)C?'S£S Sn3DN-NC?Ilt'iftfl032f �'ZLA 75'ZLS3''VtRLIZZV `rNTt�tOZ3 n0'08T•TS C''0'02T'T3 S�'=�t3I1S lIW^*d OC7Z£f On`n+,Z C0'O Z� S33IA7i3S-ipxjNr') IS3d 77'LO47#L4% **IViOl#�# #2t'T£OaT3 Zt`T*rOkT� OC1`?07� 00'8'fZ� s `S4706TS 4sq*S+70'1S rTZ`£LO-ZS T7'£LO*ZS M447 '17046(;5 £s'ZTZ`tls # Z6'4fR'1474 666+£1 00'6f,6 £ ZVIr}1 INnowv :`3IDANT 77't0*f'L93 2}I`!.a�N AO CA 0:_3241?0' 316 r:l3IA`13S A3rtr-s 7='3 33TA?43S 43NwiASNI 3313 OFE,T AOnr 06l1-,tL (-I?JHI SWIVZ') ZV3I031•+ O6fiRZIQ ra�}F'I swit+,13-lv3lOai- A3IZr'd 7fSI I -TV '�?OI Id 12+`530 3SVN3�'-ti�3 06i7TIt =1V0 IN3WArd Df0d32! ZVACeddV 3ICVAVd rlNrF733V I33d',;nXd i^.,o 4 Irl :OV -IIIA C'Nn4 ZV?1-iN39 S33IA213S NIOTI) ,dSNI '3NI dWO3VIt<CifZX ,d3ibnSV32ft :,IVts 13NI AX?ZVno 'Id3C 33NVNI3 - NSV3 A1I3d ZV3I>1I3317 d0 '3f3SSV 'tNI 'V 'N _ 'I W VNV 2(O ' ) A? CC:J2g9 33It4b3S `'N IlA!I2fd M3IA�IV3 IDNINP) is=d NCsS)-i3ONV S?3IftN3S N0II33dS14I ONn:4 IN3W?OVNVW 'ASI)J IN3W3nVNVW NSDJ 'OIZ 3AItDWCInv r 3 s IvildsoH AIINf1WW03 ls3mHl)4ON '3NI •S3DIA83S SS3NISnq €?V9 3 33NVTI(1SNI 3dIl NN,0P4V30 12fO-4 rl?I3xnOxa '03 33NVW)f NI 'IvninW JW)T>14)04V IN3W30VNVW )KI?! SUON3A VtNiJ(SR POLICE DEPARTMENT AETNA TRUCK PAKT.� ALLEN GROUP INC. AMERITECH MOBILE LJmMUNICATION BUSS- CAR WASHt lfoC. SUTLER PAPER COMPANY JOHN UAHLc3EkG ENT&4MAN".!-RUVI'v C 3. GUi10YEAR SERVICE STORES ILLINOIS 3ELL TELEPHONE CO. BALE UNIFORMS CANT_ R WORLDWIDE, INC. LITTLE AMERICA LOKL BUSINESS PRvC:UCTS E UFFIC METROME€DIA PAGING SERVICES DAVID T. NICHOLS3N NURT'WEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ORDER FROM HORDER PADDOCK PUBLICATIow) INC ERIC E. PIES WILLIAM ROSCOP SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATIGN SIMON f. SCHUSTER INC. TRI -k SIGNS TRW INFORMATION SERVICES VILLAUE SPORTS LEN- TtRt INC. XLIDATACOM}P INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACLUUNTS PAYABL`= APPROVAL R:_PORT P-YMZ_PaT DATE, 7/12/90 UKCHIASE )ESC :I PII_Si'- INVULCL AMOUNT TUTAL PART -) $19.06 $14.60 PART, S6d.87 Sb?.87 112 � rNORTrtasEST iiwY s17L.06 $17b.uo 4ASH PLAN JUNE ;O 42810.0+5 S2JU.Ot; PAPEt< $251.17 5251.17` EXPENSE_ S4I.00 $41.JL 3AUGcS w 5. 57 $5.35 TIRES Slt0ud.00 TIRES $Lt008.00 T2t(}l5.(ju 061 4 I`' G $37.81 d2d 9 i'.) G $30.63 921 9 L5 G $23.51 575 9 3G S 5300.00 575 9 3; S >Iu0.00 1491.97 HANDCUFF S $34.95 a 34.95 SERVICE AGREcPAENT-COPILR 5495.01) $495.;0 PR IS 1"SER FOOD MAY L JU f 90 $134.5,) $134.)5 SUPPLIES $47.0+ SUPPLIES $4 7.0k'J SUPPLIES $47.07 SUPPLIES $47.00 $1F36.07 PAGER RENTAL JULYtAUGtSFPT 90 S3€ i.79 5380.7` EXPENSES $283.0J SZ83.00 SElk VICtS REN1)ERLJ 5705.Ou S765.60 SERVICca RENUERL0 $195.Or! SERVICES RENDERED $782.00 $977.00 SUPPLI. S $43.32 $=+3.3Z LEGAL AJ $20.00 $20.00 RADIU KE PAIRS $446. 5v $44.`..50 =XPENS=S $149.78 $149.78 CLNG SUPPLIES $102.91 S1JL.VL PUBLICATION $55.33 $55..33 LETTERING P-99 P -Il $50.00 $5u.+J0 EMPLOYMENT INSIGHT 56..5;L $6.'s`0 AMMUNIT16N $15.95 $15.` 5 i'4TCc S_ tV IC F -JULY $b2.1L $t)[. I(? VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE ti ACCOJNT_� PAYAE+Lc APPROVAL R'rPORT PAYMENT DATE 7112/90 VEN9UR PURCHASE 0ESLRIPTI0l, INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL PtJLICE DEPAf TMLNT #*: TC:TAL*r STs5o1.33 GENERAL FUND 57541.33 FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADVANCED COMMAND SYST,--MS PROGkAMMING SERVICES *240.OU DUN ANDERSON REIMB-TOOL 3UX $20.32 $ZO.3L ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES* INC L1NtP. 4_�tVICt 3H2at13 LINEii S_RVICL $140.31 LINEN S_RVICE 8114.9) $352.2), BASIC FIRc PkJTECTIOiV IPC. SERVICL EXTINGUISHER $-t 5. 20 $45.20 SUTLER PAPER COMPANY PAPcK 5219.12 521,,i2� CENTPAL TLLEPHON'_ OF ILLINOIS 070 tr057060 J $145.27 $145.27 CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICES RAUIu MAINTENANCE Ei2, +: $92.1L) COMMiJNWEALTH EDISON f3A77-JI-2434-A yf3. 7 88.57 THE 'DRA»ING BOARj3 INC. MAILING LABELS $63.45 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORcS SUPPLIEi lls314.5J t Tlkt, SI[1.84 S19436.34 H R HART PHOTO SUPPLIES 5141.12 $161.12 BRIAN HALVERSON EXPE^Esti $11.48 $11.4d ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO, 424 1? It, G $192.14 113 9 15 G $75.010 661 9 15 G $37.82 575 9 3G S S400.0u 560 `3 17 G sdb.5> %791.n9 ILLINOIS FIRE INJPECTORS ASSN. dOOK.S $19200.00 $I,26G.00 LATTOF LEASING AND KENTAL9 INC PART:i 8507.09 $597.09 LION PHOTO SUPPLY INC. EQUIPMF_--ltT 5174.45 EQUIP MEAT 511.93 $166.94 LOKL GUSINESS PRODUCTS E OFFIC SUPPL1cS St2.00 342..00 MARS SIGNAL LIGHT COMPANYw INC GT8 i-IJ FKT CHC,-, Sl.T7 51.77 VE N9OR FIkE L EMCRGENY PROTECTION DEPT. MINULTA 5USIIiESi aYSTEMS NAPA—HEIGHTS AUT,.,(IOTIVE SUPPLY NATIONAL BUSINESS FURNITURE NATI!',,NlAL S'IMINAR)_ NUKYrlr'_ASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSI URDtk FROM HORDER PIERCE FIRE APPARATUS PROSPECT DIVE SHOP WUALEX9 INC. MATT SQUIRE STr.VL_NS PUBLILHING COOP. SWIMMERS EDGE VILLAGE OF ARLli,4L�TOv4 HEIGHTS Flkc E EMLRG_'-NCY PROTECTION DEPT. GENERAL FUND 'i !LL AlGiC uF miJUN T Pt, OSPEC T PAGE I ACCOUNT,i, PAYAbL- APPROVAL R?:PORT PAYMENT DATE 7/IZ/90 PLJ'RCAASE DESCRIPTION INVOICi: oMOU,%T TOTAL i_.0P,4TrACT R=NIEWAL $54,0.00 55 6" . 'j PARTS $04.85 SENIOR IAXI RIDES -Q Of P 11sftiT I ZY 4. 00 :Z 4.0 RE61"11TP,4Tfl;:A — DU-Ml'�VICH $99.00 013 FITNCSS LVALUATIUNS $29250.01, $18.00 SUPPL, I c- $Z.61 I SUPPLY-_ $,45.77 DARYL BOYD REPAIR PARTS $7t)2.41 .IB SUPP L I EQUI P MEN T 554.76 PHOT > SUPPLI'-S $54.90 SENIJR TAXI KIOES JUNE 90 PHOTO S)UPPLItS $3.87 $5.3.77 RtImt, $150.00 SO 8'-> R I P T I J N S4,4. OC, 5-44 U SUPPLIL 581.98 b61.96 VEH •�t:CUE CLASS s 2' 0. Ou SZS!J.00 ***TCTAL*:= 510911 9.77 $1 i:: U5 J. i7 CAPITAL IMPRV. & REDL. FUND $139.41 ****-, ** ****** ** ****** *4:--x **:-- * ** ** ** *;;: **** **** *,:; **4- 4:: HUMA:4 SERVICES DIVISION ITA ADAMCZYK HOM JRIVcR RLIMB—JUNG $3.00 51.00 AMERICAN TAXI CQ.jlNC. SENIOR IAXI RIDES $761.5u $781.56 ARA/CO',RY REFRESHMENT SERVICES CUFF-'_�_ _UPPLIES s134.Jz, $134.u6 LEONARD W. 3,AZAN HDM JRIVER REIMS—JUNE $18.00 51F. ii ,>hAkUN BLALEK HUM DRiVER REIM&.—JUNE sb.o:) nc.00 DARYL BOYD HOM DRIVER REIM?.—JUNE $18.00 $18.00 COMPJTERLAND EQUI P MEN T $7 3. 5,j $r3._>o ELK SkOVL TAXI SENIJR TAXI KIOES JUNE 90 S3102k, S3l.20 Ciltl_t-FN FSEt46ERG IST HALT:—I.NT_RN STIPEND $150.00 VENDJR HUMA14 SERVICES DIVISIUN JUDY FELL HAZEL FRIt,Kt ILLINOIS -BELL TEL1-PHONE Co. LISA LEVIN RAY LUNDIN EARLE MATTSON NORTH SHURE NORTHWEST MENTAL HEALTH CENTER NORTHWEST SUBU?tt1AN ASSOC. OF NOVAK £ PARKER INC. PETTY CASH - FItvA=vCc Jt:PT. OTTO SCHERR SCIENTIFIC SUPPLY CO. JEA3NNE SHERMAN SERTHA STEIL V E G PRINTERS INC. KATHI WESLEY HELD+ WHI TLOCK VIRGINIA ZITO HUMAN SERVICES UIVISIJN GENERAL. FUND PLANNING AND LONING DEPARTMENT VILLAGE OF kUUNT PROSPECT FAG"E I 1 ACLJU+VT..) PAYAOLF APPROVAL REPJAi PAYMENT DATE 7li2190 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICC AMUUNT TIjTAL HUM ukIV=R RLIMw-JUNE $15.Oj 8165.vaj VOLUNT-i_k-HOT Mi -AL CONTAINERS 856.7,6 85b..7o HOM URIVCR REIMb-JUNG $b.JU $ u. ,0 575 v 3r, S 5200.00 5200.uo HDM JR114ER REI't -JUNE a9. Ji. $9.uu HDM DRIVER ktIMo-JUNE 530.ou s3b.oj HDM DRIVER REIM3-JUNE S1Z.Ou $12.i SUBSCRIF TIC;N Sb. JJ b.00 dUDGcT ALLOCATI' ,:-IST PmT 8375.JO $375.U0 MEMF=:EnSHIP DUES e1L0.0i $106.00 tGUIPMCVT 8939.Ou 8'9.39.60 MISC EXYtNSES 527.1:1 827.iJ* HOM OkIVs R RtIM13-JUNE SiS Ju 315.EU SO PPL IZ-.) 511. Br 531. HDM OPIVER REIMS -JOKE 89. Oil $9.U0 HDA# DKIVcR FEIMi-k-JUNE 812.0? 512.=Uu rU Iay Si CAkr3S-SKUFLA $44.0,1 S=t,4.,JU HUM uRIVER Rt IMei-JUNE $12.00 $12.Ui) HDM ; klVr_R R rIM6-JUNL ;b. OJ i�o.JC= HDM DRIVER REIMS -JUNE $6.00 5o.ua ##: TOTAL#: b3,107.UA $ 31107. -2 GULi)cN CORRIDOR ME+LRSHIP - FRITZ 510000.00 $1,0O0.O0 MICHAEL J. MOnA:,4 SERVICES RENCERE.D $140.00 L06G - 31b N OWEN ST $173.00 $319.UO NATIUNAL GUARDIAN SECURITY SEV REPAIR' $75.00 S73.U0 PtTTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EX'tNSES '532.63 � VENDOR PLANNING AND ZONIwG DEPARTMENT QUAL--X,p INC. R TKEE PROSPECT VILLAGE OF NORTH6k?JC)K xEkGx CORP. PLAile,41NG ANU CONING DEPARTMENT STRELT DIVISION AETNA TRUCK PARTS ALel%, CARLSON & CO. ALDRIDGE ELECTRIC* INC. ALLEN GROUP INC. AM -LIN PRODUCTS9 INC. AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES/ IN ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO. ARkUW RUAU CONSTRUCTIUN BEAKING UISTRIbUTURS, INC. BRIGHTON ENGINEERING SUCKFRIDGE DOJR Ccl).. 8USSE CAR WASH, IN CHEM kITL PROULICTS COMPANY VILLAGc OF MuU,JT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYAeL.- APPROVAL Ri:POkT PAYMENT DATE 7/12/90 PURLHASE OESCkIPTION M I SC i-- X P -IN S E S MISC -X'JLN' FS PHJTO PRUCCSSING LDdC, - L�,-�NQUI" RU COPY fjt= ZONING CODE MUNT",LY PQUlrY iLAN JULY iNVOICt AMOUNT S-13.52 513.39 x7.24 v6f3lb.lz 1:4.25 $141.21; ***TCTAL*V- $IiZ:)6.92 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT PAGE lz TGIAL Vc S70.-j-t-.� :7.24 S 8-P 3 1 t). 12 5.25 bds 7 2 4. 0 1 PARTS 523.22 PARTS 51b9.74 PARTS $25.3e PARTS $23.89- $194.3, LINCUL`v ST 'iRIDG_- REPAIR $57t859.20 $579859.20 TRAFFIC SIGNAL REPAIRS S1-P679.OU JUNE 40 TRAFFIC SIGNAL NTCE $1*9ta8.75 5J, 647.T:> PARTS $68.87 $h8.67 GRAIN HfiSE $101.35 SiOl. j5 SUPPLI_E:_-, $24.89 SZ -..-9 MTCE SERVICE 5140.00 $140.00 MATERIAL $120. oil FORE,)T AVE RECONSTRUCTION $IZ7v1I6.T3 $1279236.73 PART'S $11.I4 $11.14 FUREST AVE REC&iSTRMTIDN $81609.55 $8v809.35 SEKVICk UOUR $54.00 $54.00 VEH WAlpiES $11.00 111.00 CL14G SUPPLII:�i $409.90 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 7112/90 VENDOR rURCmASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREt-T DIVISIJty CLNG SJPPLI-S 854.16 LLNG SUPPLIES 3158.00 $622.08 CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI :iATEt U-3AG1 CHS; $78.86 S78.8d CLS UNIFORM RENTALS UNIFQRX SEKVICE $75.33 UNIFUR'4 SERVICE $20.44 UNIFURi-' SERVICE $75.34 UNIFORM SEPVICt $19.32 5190.43 COKENOWE-R TREE EXPERTS INC. REFUSE DISPOSAL ibou.00 $600.00 COMMUDOR-E MAINTLNANCE SYSTEMS CLNG St' VICE $1r836.e)6 ,. CLNG S'®RVICE $Iv836.00 CL NO SERVICE 564.OL; � CLNG SERVICE $Is836.00 CL N.* S--i<VICE So4.0i CLigG SLi-,VICE S1r836.'Ju CL SG SE; ;VICE $64.0v r LLNG SE VICE $1s 836.00 , CLNG StnVICE $64. DO v SERVICE RENDERED b1:836.ti+� SERVICtS RENOERLD $o4.O6 $119336.60 COMMOWLALTH EJIS N SERVICE MAY 90 I8vSba.82 SERVICE MAY 90 $6*316.bti $15f3G5. COOK COUNTY TREASURER TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE $li,196.84 Siy196:6 DOOR SYSTEMS, INC. MTLc SUPPLIES $80.70 S,3v.70 ENGINEMASTERS, INC. cQUIPMtaT $i.45O.00 MANUAL 512.56 Slr4b1.50 F I; V CEMENT CONTRACTORS 1990 CU<;-^ L GUTTrR PROGRAM $iU39429.SL $1039429.10 MARK GAML31NO LANDSCAPING IYC MELAS PARK RESTORATION S475.00 $475.UU GOUDYLAR SERVICE STORES TIRES $704.94 5704.94 THE GJVERNMENT HOOK STORE PUBLICAIIJNS $6..50 $6.50 HUDEC FENLE RAILING INSTALLATION -MELAS PARK $Iy615.Ov '$lvb25.00 10ENTITY HATS 1134.19 $134.15 INGRAM ENTERPRISESi INC. TURF MLjwING $70O.0J 570ii.uO JACKSON-HIRSH* INC. LAMItiATING MATERIAL $38.00 $38.00 KINbEK INlUUSTRIAL SUPPLY 2O04 TALE MEASWE: $b5.79 $05.79 CHARLES KLEHM E -;lUN NURSERY PLANTING MATERIAL $611.25 So21.25 LEWIS c6�ttIPMENT CO. PARTS $27.11 SZ7.11 VILLAGE OF "OUNT PRUSPECT PACE 14 ACCTJUNTi PAYA3L,- APPROVAL REPORT PAYMt:NT DATE 7/12/90 VENDQR BURL-iASE OESCRIPTIU,, INVOICE AMOUNT TdiTAL STREET DIVISION J.G. LICHT COMPANY SUPPL I L � 533.90 Suppi- I E. 1 57.40 SUPPLIc-S $33.0;3 SUPPLIt,) $13.90 SUPPLIES Si7.46 SO PPL I E'8823.60 SUPP L I L.3 $B.60 SUPPL I :'!, x4.72 $142.56 NORTAERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 1601 GOLF RD $4�*9.90 14 1� bUSSE AVE 5323.7') 112 t: li-38THWtST HWY $5io.86 i0o S t-PACERSON $677.20 ilO NORTHWEST HWY $ lt5 4. 5r 1700 he L NTRAL $863.67 x2497 i-:.91 NORTHWEST FIRL EXII;NGIJI:�,HEr, & 1990 F1' EXT141'�IJI"Hck !iFAVU-'cl- I't 3 . 33 1990 FI,c- EXTINGUISHER SERVILE 5143.83 1990 Fl.E EXTINGUISHER SERVICE $143.83 1990 Ffrc EXTINGUISHER SERVICE $143.83 1990 FL,c EXTINGUISHER SERVICE $143.84 $719.1b PREF RM TRAFFIC CONTROL SERVICLS RENUERFJ �3v4G-G.UG $39,tUO-00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 539.00 $39.00 PETTY CASH - PU6LLC ,qJRKS YRAVt:L SUPPLIES 3.35 TRAVf-L C SUPPLI--S $4.21 TRAV_L L SUPPLIES 533.53 TRAVEL F, SUPPLIES $19.07 TRAVEL t! SUPPLIES $17.32 TRAVEL & SUPPLIES S3.4u $78.35* PULLAKL) MOTOR COMPANY PARTS $71.86 PARTS 853.49 PARTS 529*81 5155.16 PORTAOLE TOOL SALES SUPPLIES $115.85 5115.05 POWER DYNAMICS INC. PARTS 1192.50 s144.50 R. C. TOPSOIL MATERIALS JUNE 90 5540.00 i546.00 RIC MAR INDuSTRjt:Sj INC. SUPPLIES $3,70. it $35C.1b SAFETY KLE-:N COkPORATIUN C L Ni", S UP P L I c S $102.92 810e.92 SCHUTER EQUIPMLN1 COMPANY PARTS $633.72 $o33-72 VENUIIR STREET DIVISION SUIL L ,*MATERIAL CONSULTANTS* I STA14DARD PIPs L SUPPLY INC. STATE TREASURER TECH SYN CORPORATION WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS STREET DIVISION GENERAL FUND NATER AND SEWER DIVISION VILLAGv JF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCUJ NTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT P,kYMLNT DATE 71121913 PURCHASE DESCRIPTIO.N INVCICc AMOUNT TOTAL ',lAT&xIAL TESTING $48.00 $469.80 MATtxIAL TESTING $64.Ou $11OB7.94 1990 MATERIAL TESTING 8490.00 $b22.00 "RISC PLc`G SUPPLItS $43.94 $43.94 MTCE COSTS $108.24 $75.33 MTLE LUSTS 5177.59 MTCE COSTS 5313.05 MTCE CJSTS $437.85 $1*03b.73 PARTS $30.84 $30.b4 SUPPLIES $2037.25 SUPPLIES $324.0:: $531.25 $41v914.72 MOTOk FUEL TAX FUND ***TOTAL** $34 L's 57£5.45 l3&l-v6U3.73 AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK t3OND TRANSFER FEES 5111.0.) PW FACILITY -INTEREST 19878 0711190 S49*232.50 $49*343.504 AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES SERVICE S66.06 MTC[ -MAY 90 $550.00 $616.00 AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES SERVICE 5300.40 BADGER METER INC BUSSE CAR WASH* INC. CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP CLS UNIFORM RENTALS SERVICE SERVICE COMPOUND METER VLH 'WAS7itS SUBSCRIPTION RENtWAL UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SERVICE UNIFORM SEKVICE $11202.80 $469.80 $1*913.00 51*037.94 $11OB7.94 Sbl.SJ 801.50 525.85 $25.85 $75.34 520.43 $75.33 ILLAGE JF MUUNT PROSPECT PAG-- lo ACC'U`tT, PAYABLc, APPROVAL REPORT PYMENF DATE- 7/12/90 VENt)Uk PURC CASE OESCRIPTIUN INVOICE AMUUNT TUTAL WATt{ AND SEWEt< .3IVISION UNIFUkM SE -.VICE 819.32 S19U.4Z CUMMONWEALTH EJISJN 387?-Ji-`ib6Fi-0 $334.19 $334.19 CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT•L BK !"PER/FAINT CUSTS-JAWA $23t039.0U VILLAS= SHAkE FIX::='J COSTS-JAWA &1u7t3Zl.0J LAK,- hA1ER PURCHASE-JAWA $114t$44.Ot POWER C:.;STS-JAWA $11t094.Ocj $256944€s. 0C FRcD;r<IKSti4 L SONS EXiItaGUISHER SEr, VICE $20.0u EXTINGUISHER StmVICE $20.00 540.00 GLENriROOK EXCAVATING SERVICES REINDERED $7,240.0,1 $7t29U.u0 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORFLS LIR I.9.2,s TIRE $78.17 TIRE'S $933.24 blt020.69 I.E..M. COkPOKATI!:Ifs mTCE C.OmPUTE3<S - PRINTck-JULY S 194t . OL - M T L E CU4PUTERS L PRINTER JULY 552.0:1 $246. u0 IDENTITY HATS $134.18 5134.lb ILLINOIS HELL TELEPHONE CO. 455 }`, G '6203.83 068 9 i'> G $533.12 774 9 15 G $30.03 u13 9 1> G $.JO.o.i Z10 -? 15 G $61.25 044 9 62 G $47.32 575 9 3Ea S S3G0.OL) 347 9 3G S $23.74 $ls2)5.52 ILLINOIS FWD TRUCK G EQUIPME�vT MTCE SUPPLIE-S $415.80 $415.30 KOCH L SON LANDS( -APING, INC. PKWY KESTORATION S1tZ04.OG PKWY kESTORATION $2:486.00 $31690.O6 J.C. LICHT COMPANY SUPPLIEI $252.05 $252.05 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS L OFFIC COMPUTc!. SUPPLIES $129.83 ElL9.33 MANPt3WER INC. TEMP HELP-6RIESHABER 5694.40 $694.44 MEYER MATERIAL CO. RAV -L $305.78 SJU5.78 NATIONAL ELECTRIC CABLE SUPPLIES $291.90 $291.90 NATI3NAL GUARJIA`d SECURITY SER ;QUARTERLY SERVICt CHARGE $25.00 S25.Ll0 NEENAH FOUNDRY CJ. PARTS 5608.00 PARTS $300.06 $9U8.60 NORTHEf<N ILLINOIS GAS C 1. SS u,LLF 1W WAPELLA $24.61 1E316 -1/Z RUNITA UR $26.12 LILLAGE JF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 ACCOUNTS PAYABL APPROVAL REPORT PkYMENT LATE 7112/90 VENDOR PUxCHASE OESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATc< AND SEXIER. DIVISION *444z ;*4c*;A*r*$:*;Mv ;;�:* *#v*****a:*vr*YY*rm;vrrYr*r*a**r******#*********;*;<*r***** **r***:#$:***mom-****;-*M;;�: PARKING SYSTEM UIVISIUN CHICAGO I. NORTHWESTERN TRANS C LAND LEASE JJNE 519866.20 $19!586.20 1I11 -112 BONITA OR $40.53 117 i k;AVERLY $34.41 170[1 W CENTRAL $868.66 ,NS KtiNSINGTON I RAND $18.60 NS KLNSINGTON 1E: RA NU $27.69 112 E HIGHLAND AVE $40.15 $1-PO65.77 NORTHWEST FIR= txTINGUISHER C 199O Fly t- cXTINGUISHEk SERVICE 5143.34 5143.64 PAIIDUCK PUHLICATIliNS INC LEGAL N'JTICE $20.06 LEGAL NOTICE $20.03 $46.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $13.00 $lJ.co* PETTY CASH - PUBLIC 4URKS TRAVEL is SUPPLI-S bc5.oul r TRAVLL C SUPPLIt S 514.04 TRAVLL t: SUPPLI+�S $36.00 TRAVEL k: SUPPLILS 13.9tb 59").t}ur POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS $71.ei 571.61 POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOil- AAT, --k tILLS $419.89 $419.b9* PkIMt PRINTING INC. FORMS $153.00 $153.uo PROSAFETY SAFETY CAN $48.49 $48.49 SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION [LNG SUPPLIFS $102.92 3102.92 STANDARD PIPE E SUPPLY INC. MISC PL.SG SUPPLitS $65.17 MISC FLi G SUPPLIES $64.32 3IZ9.49 TECH SYN LOkPORAFION PARTS $13.0J 613.Od>- TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY JUNE 90 CYLINDER RENTAL Si2.91) 512.95 TIME MARK CORPORATION REPAIR "•ATERIALS $652.03 $652.08 NATEt AND SLWck UIVISION #v:#TOTAL*4I $329,F734.59 WATER E S= -WLR FUND $3249734.59 *444z ;*4c*;A*r*$:*;Mv ;;�:* *#v*****a:*vr*YY*rm;vrrYr*r*a**r******#*********;*;<*r***** **r***:#$:***mom-****;-*M;;�: PARKING SYSTEM UIVISIUN CHICAGO I. NORTHWESTERN TRANS C LAND LEASE JJNE 519866.20 $19!586.20 VENDOR PARKING SYSTEM DIVISI,JN LummuUQhE MAINTL'4ANCE SYSTEMS NORfHEkN ILLINOIS GAS CO. PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION PAKKIN6 SYSTt-M R'--VcNUE FUND VILLAS" JF MjUr4T PROSPECT ACCOuNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 7/12/90 PURI-HASE DESCRIPTIUN CL41' SE. -,VICE LLNG St" V ICE CL Nk, � EN V IL E CL NG S,: I V IL E CL NG S El V IC E SERVICES RENDEKI-D 19 -iUATHWEST FA PAGE I) INVEICE :,MbUfNT VITAL $140.00 5140.00 � $140.00 $140.00 $1,10.00 $10.76 570.76 ***TOTAL*� l21796.96 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION MID—AMERICA PACKAGING YARD MATERIAL BAIUS $8v279.53 $66279.53 REHRIG PACIFIC CJ. RECYLLING BINS $2T200.U0 $21200.00 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION **jr.TCTAL*v- SIOP479.53 GENERAL FUND $1j9479.53 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ANDERSON LOCK LU"4PANY E:QUIPMzliT 5155.00 555.1j0 COSBY AND BELL LEGAL SERVICES 319524#70 7J LATTUF CHLVROLETv INC. -: Q Ul P M -- N T 5139206.0e c:Qulr'Mt NJ S99353.30 k:Q(Jlf, MtN T $121497.67 VENDOR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS MARTAM CONSTRUCTION TESTING SERVICE CORPORATION JUN P. TILE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GENEkAL FUND DOWNTOWN REL)EVLPMT CONST 1985 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES 14ILLAGE JF MOUNT PROSPECT ACLU-uNTJ- PAYAf3Lt APPROVAL REPORT PuYM,zNT DATE 7112/90 f�URCNASE DESCRIPTION INVCICt AMOUNT F�iiIPM: '� I 1;9♦ 353.313 FINAL ?;,IT—Mt-:LAS i'K StWtR $30#442.50 SE#.VICE. RtNJE= I () f (#439.00 SER VICES RL- NOERED $1#050.00 ###TDTAL*vz $3201-3b.50 MOTOK EQUIPMENT POOL f-UND $11524.70 PAG}_ 1'4 TOTAL $44#41Z.35 $30�#4•t2.5 $ Iv439.6 $i#0'3u.1j 0 $78199 J. `,5` 444412. 35 COURTESY HOME CENTER SUPPLIta $26.93 SUPPLIES $2b.98 SUPPLIES $59.70 SUPPLIES Sl',4.11 $to7.77 FOLGIRS FLAG E OFCORATINGP INC BANNcR Its''JTALLATIU!v $177.50 SUPPLI_S Slb9.93 $347.4 PETTY CASH — PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL L SUPPLIE=S 547.85 r TRAVEL L SUPPLIES $t6.Z7 TRAVEL t: SUPPLIES $133.15 $207.27# WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS SUP,'LIeS $207.25 $Z07.Z5 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL*# 11�t t9.T> GENERAL FUND Si #U'+j.72 VENOUR DEbT SERVICE FUNJ.S AMERICAN NATIONAL OANK THE F IRST CHICAG1,1 DANK OF M.P. FIRST NATIONAL 6A,'NK OF CHICAGO FIRST NATfL BANK MJF MY. PROS. DEET SERVICE FUNDS CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E 1 1973 SSA 91 PROSPECT Mr—ADUWS 8 E I COWNT'.,)WN RE!)tVLPr4T B & I 19e7C '41LLAGE'1� MOUNT PROSPECT - PAGE ACCOU=NT`' PAYABLI- APPROVAL REPORT P;�YMENT OATE 7/IZ/90 ,U',-°L'HASE DES(,RiPTIIJ,% INVCIC-f AMOUNT YuTAL 4OND TRANSFER FEtS 52Z7.W BONO TRANSFER FE -S S203.25 PW FkCILITY-INTEREST 19`376 D7/1/90 $1009170.00 U/T t,EL)EV 191j7C INT 07/l/90 $14,3,12.Su SSA ,'I INT�RL=ST 00; 7/1/90 55v145.00 55v145.jO CORP PU-P 1973 INT 07/1/90 *17vauU.06 $179UGG.JO CORP PUI�P 1974-li,4T $357000.00 535v00J.Gj*: ***TOTAL** $172,PI17.75 SL Igo.) u.Uj CORPORATE PURPOSES B & I 1974 3`s jLJU0.00 3'4,145.0() P W FACILITY 6 & I 1967E, iIjD 137. GJ $14v53j.75 *41.11;**;=***�***r;***Y********,-<,********-,2c*****************�*********************4--*******#*�,**,t*4,*******4;:,:** PENSION FUNDS FIRST NATL BANK OF MT. PkDS. CHA;LES W. NICK VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAUL H. WATKINS PENS'. ON FUNDS GENERAL FUNJ WITHzjLtJING TAXIES PtNS,'P'J'4 JULY 90 AUGU'T "--:-DILAL INS JULY "ISIAOILITY ''t-NEFIT sq"-i.ZZ 3-t-N&FIT TRUST 1`2 $ZuO.OU- $883.22 $346.33 $196ZO.50 ***TOTALt-* i �-� 0 0 . 0 1 S683.22 $346.33 $19620.50 �029%Ampmm 52,160.83 ALL DEPARTME,4TS FJTAL $10641VI24j.73 OATt RUN 712/93 VILLAGE i.;F '1-JUNT PROSPECT TIME RUN 10.26.31 ACCOUNTS PAYABL`. APPROVAL LISTING SUMIARY 9Y FUND 7112190 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT I GENERAL FU'..j $568:742.38 22 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 'i300vbJ3.73 23 COMMUNITY C :-VLMT 3LO(:1 (;kAi,%T $109140.79 24 ILL. MUNICIPAL ?NETIREM-NT FdJNJ 5599856.60 31 BENEFIT TAU'ST t,2 $29166.83 41 WATER L SEi.Lk t-UNU 13779173.69 46 PARKING SYS -m xEVENUE FUND $598-49.54 48 MOTOR t,iUIPME IST POOL FUN,3 $449412.35 49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $769466.92 51 CAPITAL IMPnV. & REPL. FUND $139.41 55 OOWNTOi4N REGEVLPMT CONT 1965 $19524.7) 60 CORPORATE PURPt3SES J & 1 1973 $l7tOJ0.03 bi CORPORATE eURPt.)SE5 9 & 1 1974 $359000.00 62 SSA ui PROSPECT MEADOWS ti & I $5x145.00 69 P W FACILITY 6 & 11987 $100097.00 7i OJWNTOWN REUEVLPMT 9 & 119-"7C $149585.75 73 FLEXCJ.lAP ES ,10)x FUNJ $5:025.31 74 ESCROW OEPOSIT FUNO $16050.73 TOTAL ALL FUNDS $19b41:120.73 PA Gt 21 IO-APPSAR General and Special Revenue Funds General Fund Motor Fuel Tax Fund Community Development Block Grant Fund Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund Enterprise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund Parking System Revenue Fund Internal Service Funds Risk Management Fund Motor Equipment Pool Fund Capital Projects Capital Improvement Repl or Repair Fund Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 Downtown Redev Const Fund (1985) Debt Service Funds Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund Escrow Deposit Fund Police Pension Fund Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Funds VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT June 1, 1990 - June 30, 1990 Fund Revenues Expenses Fund Balance for for Balance May 31, 1990 June, 1990 ,Tune 1990 June 30, 1990 $ 3,300,517 $1,123,449 $1,295,110 $ 3,128,856 721,021 96,677 64,830 752,868 5,339 7,000 22,367 < 10,028> < 54,891> 3,713 49,255 < 100,433> 4,226,954 395,625 581,427 4,041,152 250,811 14,635 49,488 215,958 1,112,938 172,782 114,849 1,170,871 - 566,000 17,615 548,385 716,816 10,064 460,193 266,687 134,823 1,775 16,393 120,205 f 949,627 24,017 179,987 793,657 14,647,201 221,441 43,464 14,825,178 16,532,080 245,855 43,279 16,734,656 261.545 2,208 2,167 261.586 542,804,781 $2.885.241 $2,940,424 $42.749,598 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30P90 1990-9L Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL GENERAL FUND ONREC•D BALANCE PAGE 1 X BALANCE BAL TAX REVENUE 509357 309736 1-000-00-4101 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 2TS*000 L -000-00-410Z ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES L-000-00-4001 TAXES -CORPORATE CURRENT 19514.500 252.416 1-000-00-4105 PLAN EXAMINATION FEES 19514.500- 195L4.500- 1-000-00-4002 TAXES -CORPORATE PRIOR IVT239300 28T.216 129606 129606 1.7109694- 117t09694 - L -000-00-4004 TAXES -GARBAGE CURRENT 745.600 1249266 BUSINESS LICENSES 1609000 745.600- 745.600- 1-000-00-4005 TAXES -GARBAGE PRIOR 926,600 154.432 6.778 6.778 9199822- 9199822- 1-000-00-4010 TAXES-RDLBROG CURRENT 12.000 21000 92.000 -1-000-00-41t9 12.000- 129000- 1-030-00-4011 TAXES-ROGBROG PRIOR 129000 29000 101 101 L11899- 119899- 1-000-00-4011 RETAILERS OCCUPATION TAX519259000 9879500 1.0059486 4819950 49919951+1- 499199514- 1-000-00-4014 SALES TAX -SPECIAL PAYI4NT 1.775.000 1-000-00-4151 STATE SALES TAX L2590OO 1-000-00-4152 1-000-00-4015 FOREIGN FIRE INS TAX 1-000-00-4t54 GRANT-SR.CITIIEN TAXI 1-000-00-4L55 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPO ' 1-000-09-4016 AUTO RENTAL TAX 6.000 1.000 1.266 555 49134- 49734- ► -000-00-4017 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 5259000 87.500 4I.999 259072 483900►- 4S390U1- L-000-00-4018 FOOD 6 BEVERAGE TAX 5509000 919666 90,640 38.372 459.360- 4591360- 1-000-00-4020 ELECTRONICS GAME TAX 121000 29000 399- 399- 12.000- 129000- L'000-00-4064 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 11536.557- 1.5369555- 81- 2959832 4209342 182.559 1-000-00-4065 PERSONAL PROP REPL RLS 76- 20.832 269689 99306 1089311- L089311- TOTAL TAX REVENUE 250.000 199529000 1.991.996 1x158.876 5681434 7939124- 109193.124 - FEE REVENUE 509357 309736 1-000-00-4101 BUILDING PERMIT FEES 2TS*000 L -000-00-410Z ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 45.000 t-000-00-4104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 279500 1-000-00-4105 PLAN EXAMINATION FEES 50.000 1-000-00-4106 STREET OPENING FEES 500 1-000-00-4107 VEHICLE LICENSE FEES 130.000 1-000-00-4LO8 DUG LICENSES L29000 1-000-00-4109 LIQUOR LICENSES 1279500 t-000-00-4110 BUSINESS LICENSES 1609000 1-000-00-4it-2 PUBLIC IMPR INSPECTIONS 659000 1-000-00-4tl3 RENTAL FEES 45.000 1-000-00-4114 FEES-BOARO OF APPEALS 159000 1-000-00-4115 CENTEL FRANCHISE FEES 3t9000 1-000-00-4116 SELL SYS FRANCHISE FEES 92.000 -1-000-00-41t9 ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS 13.000 1-000-00-4120 FALSE ALARM FEES 10.000 1-000-00-4121 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 155.000 L-000-00-4123 LANOLJRDJTENANT FEES 35.000 TJTAL FEE REVENUE 649044- 1.888.500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1-000-00-4150 STATE INCOME TAX 1.775.000 1-000-00-4151 STATE SALES TAX L2590OO 1-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX -SP PMT 1.5009000 1-000-00-4t54 GRANT-SR.CITIIEN TAXI 1-000-00-4L55 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPO 100- t-000-00-4156 EMPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS Z0.000 t-000-00-4159 FLOOD REIMBURSEMENTS 83- L-000-00-4160 RECYCLING GRANT 2.500 1-000-00-4161 GRANT - POLICE M E G !09000 1-000-00-4162 GRANT-ILEC POLICE TRGM Z0.000 L-000-00-4163 GRANT -STATE FIRE TRAING 17.500 1-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 131.500 t00- 99- t00- 99- t00- 99- 83 - 0 0 T9- 92- 84- t00 - 0 0 553- 45.832 509357 309736 2249643- 224.643- 62- 79500 10.395 69900 34:605- 349605- 77- 49582 S9140 39308 229352- 229352- 81- 8.332 10.544 59692 39.456- 399456- 79- 82 250 ISO 250- 250- 50- 1219666 75.460 ZI949t 654954L- 6541540- 90- 29000 661 ITS 119340- 119339- 94- 21.250 1159420 49320 L29080- LI*080- _ 9- 261666 139490 59447 1%.SLD- 1469510- 92- 101832 956 956 64.044- 649044- 99- 7.500 45.000- 451000- 100- 29500 59517 250 9,483- 99483- 63- 59166 319000- 311000- 100- 159332 159245 79626 760755- 7697S5- 83- 2.166 1.225 19225 119775- ►t9T75- 91- 19666 525 185 9.475- 99475- 95- 259832 129151 142.849- 142.849- 92- 59832 349601 69769 399- 399- 1- 314.736 3519945 959233 11536.557- 1.5369555- 81- 2959832 4209342 182.559 1.3549658- 19354.658- 76- 20.832 269689 99306 1089311- L089311- 87- 250.000 297.602 1299246 -►.202.398- L92029396- 80- 0 O 39332 I19OT 19907 189093- 189893- 90- 0 416 29500- 29500- !00- 4.666 109000- 10.000- !00- 3.332 209000- 20.000- 100- 29916 179500- 179500- 100- 221916 137.500- 1379500- 100- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6130/90 1990-91 Y-T-O Y-T-D CUR MO U14REE-0 = BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE SAL GENERAL FUND INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1-000-00-4165 PERSONAL PROP REPL REB 39500 582 389 3,Ilt- 39Ltl- 89- TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 3,61t90O0 6ot,824 736.929 323.Ot8 298749OT1- 2981F49o71- 80- SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 1-000-00-4175 W E S SERVICE CHARGE 2000000 33,332 20.000 209000 1809000- L809000- 90- 1-000-00-41TT MAINT OF STATE HIGHWAYS 509000 5,332 509000- 509000- too- 1-000-00-4 LTS FOREST RIVER RURAL FPD 149500 29416 149500- ►49500- 100- L-000-00-4180 AMBULANCE TRNSPRT FEE. 45,000 7,500 6992I 49823 389079- - 389079- 85- TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 309,500 51.580 260921 249823 2829579- 2829579- 91- PARKING REVENUE 1-000-00-4216 FINES - LOCAL 1359000 ZZ.500 249997 119428 tIo9003- 1L09003- 8l- 1-000-00-421T FINES - CIRCUIT COURT 1459000 249166 33,468 16.460 1119532- 1!11532- 77- 1-00U-00-4218 FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES 500 82 125 125 3T5- 375- 75- TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 2809500 469748 58.590 IB.O13 2219910- - 2219910- T9- OTHER REVENUE L-000-00-4231 SALE OF CODE BOOKS 19500 250 124 27 - 19376- 19376- 92- 1-000-00-4Z33 SALE OF REFUSE BAGS 312,SOo 52.082 169679 79407 295,82t- 295982►- 95- L-000-OU-4235 RECYCLING INCOME 40.000 6.666 409000- 40,000- Loo- ►-OOO-00-4Z43 SENIOR CENTER REVENUE 59000 832 2037 29657 29163- 2.Lb3- 43- 1-OOU-Oo-4Z44 SPECIAL DETAIL REVENUE 10.000 ►►666 214 99726- 9,726- 97- 1-000-00-4245 REIMB-S£RVICESEPROPERTY L59000 2.500 19098 140 139902- - 139902- 93- 1-000-00-4246 REIMS - YOUTH COUNSELING 359000 59832 359000- 359000- too- 1-000-00-4247 POLICE E FIRE REPORTS 12,D0o 2.000 29245 19096 9.755- 9,755-' St- 1-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 290.000 48.332 489330 429090 2419670- 2419670- 03- t-000-00-9#249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 259000 4.166 59428 68T L9.572- 199572- TB- 1-000-00-4250 SANK INTEREST INCOME 30,000 5,000 682 682 299318- 29,318- 96- 1-000-00-4251 MROT INTEREST DISTRIBUTN 0 1-000-00-4253 INTEREST - ESCROW FUND 90,000 15,000 129739 8,963 7T.Z61- 779261- 86- t-000-00-4255 FLOOD LOANS INTEREST L59000 19666 29522 L9095 13.476- t3,478- 64- t-0UO-00-4256 FLOOD LOANS PRINCIPAL 40,000 6,666 L6093 3,439 23,607- 239607- 59- 1-000-00-4262 MAINT. OF STATE HWYS. 0 1-000-00-4264 REIMS - CENTRAL ROAD 0 1-000-00-4265 WOLF ROAD REIMBURSEMENT 0 1-000-00-4267 WOLF RD REIMBURSEMENT 0 1-000-00-426d SCHOENBECK ROAD REIMS 4U0,0O0 66,666 400.000- 400,400- Lo0- 1-000-00-4269 FOREST AVE REIMBURSEMENT 2L►000 39500 21,Ooo- ZL9000- 100- 1-000-00-4270 TRANS FROM TRUST ACCTS 0 1-000-00-4273 SURVEILLANCE REVENUE 0 1-000-00-4275 SHARED COST-SIDEWALK 1159000 4,166 18,301 7,030 6.693- 6,693- 27- 1-000-00-4276 SHARED COST-FREE REPLC 60,000 ►09000 6,024 53997b- 539976- 90- 1-000-OU-4277 FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM 20,000 3,332 179040 89610 2.960- 2,960- 15- ►-000-00-4299 GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT _ 16 5 16 16 0 .TOTAL OTHER REVENU__ 1.44R.o00 Z41,3ZZ 150,738 839928 1,2979262- 19297.262- 90- TOTAL GENERAL FUND 9,4899500 3,248,206 2,483,999 191239449 7,0059503- 17,0059501- IT9- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30190 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FLOW CONTROL REVENUE FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 21-000-00-4190 FLOOD CONTROL SERYCE CNG 305,000 50,832 TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENGE 305,000 50,832 3139600 TOTAL FLOOD CONTROL REVENUE FUND 305,000 50,832 311,306- MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 99- 52,500 89T50 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 52,500- 52,500- 22-000-00-4157 4 F T ALLOCATION 19150,000 191,666 181,107 22-000-00-4242 REIMBURSEMT ON PROJECTS 41,000 6,832 100- 22-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FUND 29232 19340 19340 227000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 19,000 3,156 9.180 22-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 357 79 33 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE L92LO.000 201,664 190,320 TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 1,210,000 201,664 L90.320 COMMUNITY OEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 23-000-00-4155 COBG GRANT 23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT ----------------------------------- ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND TAX REVENUE 24-000-00-4055 TAXES - CURRENT 24-000-00-4056 TAXES - PRIOR 24-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX TOTAL TAX REVENUE INTERFUND TRANSFERS 24-000-00-4228 TRANS-GENERALICABLE TV 24-000-00-4148 INTEREST INCOME TDTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND ----------------------------------- LIBRARY FUND TAX REVENUE 539,725 89,954 18,000 509000 89332 539.725 98,286 18,000 5899725 98.286 18,000 91,934 4,710 33 96v677 96,677 7.000 7,000 T,o00 UNREC•D BALANCE 3059000- 3059000- 3059000- 968, 893- 41.OUO- 99820- 33 1,019,680- 1,oI9,680- 521,725- 50.000- 571.725- 5719725- PAGE 3 X BALANCt BAL 305.000- 100- 305,000- 100- 305,000- L00- 9689893- 84- 41.000- 100- 0 9,820- 52- 33 0 1,019,680- 84- L,019,680- 84- 521.725 97- 50,000- too- 571,725- 97- 571,715- 97- 3079600 519266 30T9600- 307,600- 100- 3139600 529266 29294 2,294 - 311,306- 311,306- 99- 52,500 89T50 52,500- 52,500- to0- 6139700 1L2,282 29294 2,294 67L,406- 671,406- 100- 13,400 29232 19340 19340 12,060- 129060- 90- 39100 516 357 79 2.743- 29743- 88- 169500 2.748 1.697 1,419 14,803- 14.803- 90- 690,200 115.030 3,991 39713 686.209- 686,269- 99- WATER E SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 4t -000-00-40Z0 TAXES - PRIOR 41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES TJTAL TAX REVENUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 41-000-00-4157 GRANT - P M SEWER 41-ODO-00-4201 WATER SALES 41-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES 4I-000-00-4204 ,METER SALES t.t-0OU-00-4205 MATER E SEWER TAPS 41-000-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 41-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 41-000-00-4246 JAMA INCOME 41-00U-00-4247 JAWA INTEREST 41-030-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 41-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS 41-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 41-000-00-4280 SALE OF PROPERTY 41-000-00-4289 GAIN/LOSS SALE OF ASSET 41-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVEST. 41-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 41-000-00-4299 WATER CLEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE TOTAL WATER E SEWER FUND UNREC•D BALANCE t9618,700- Zt8,400- 140.700- 29,120- 290069920- 52.28U- 269600- 78988U- 40. DOO- "WOOD- 3819120- 461,120- 2, 546. 92 0- 764.800 5 127,466 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT T64,800- 887.000 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 5*896 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30190 30}000 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO 29,628- BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 39-000-00-4031 TAXES - LIBRARY SERVICES1.6189700 269.782 3929400 39-U00-00-4037 TAXES - IMRF 2189400 369400 32,693- 39-000-00-4038 TAXES - MAINT E REPAIR 140,700 23,450 302#98L 39-000-00-4039 TAXES -INSURANCE E AUDIT 29,120 4*852 559919 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 210069920 334,484 _ INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 49611 510953- 209000 39-000-00-4157 STATE GRANT 52.280 80712 13.873- 39-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPO TAX 260600 49432 1L,384 TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 78,880 13.144 59184 PARKING REVENUE 19,8L6- LO.000 1,666 39-OOU-00-4216 TINES AND FORFEITS 409000 69666 50,000 39-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 40}000 6#666 50*OUO- 39-000-00-4254 OTHER INCOME 3819120 630520 34,435 TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 4619t20 76,852 115 TOTAL LIBRARY FUND 2,5469920 424.480 832 WATER E SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 4t -000-00-40Z0 TAXES - PRIOR 41-000-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES TJTAL TAX REVENUE INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 41-000-00-4157 GRANT - P M SEWER 41-ODO-00-4201 WATER SALES 41-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 41-000-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES 4I-000-00-4204 ,METER SALES t.t-0OU-00-4205 MATER E SEWER TAPS 41-000-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 41-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 41-000-00-4246 JAMA INCOME 41-00U-00-4247 JAWA INTEREST 41-030-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 41-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS 41-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 41-000-00-4280 SALE OF PROPERTY 41-000-00-4289 GAIN/LOSS SALE OF ASSET 41-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVEST. 41-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 41-000-00-4299 WATER CLEARING ACCOUNT TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE TOTAL WATER E SEWER FUND UNREC•D BALANCE t9618,700- Zt8,400- 140.700- 29,120- 290069920- 52.28U- 269600- 78988U- 40. DOO- "WOOD- 3819120- 461,120- 2, 546. 92 0- 764.800 5 127,466 T64,800- 887.000 147}832 59896 5*896 881,L04- 30}000 59000 312 372 29,628- 1.6819800 280#298 6,268 6#268 196759532- 3929400 65,400 359,707 32,693- 3,534,000 589,000 6001817 302#98L 2,933*183- 335*000 55#832 559919 279961 279.081- 609000 10,000 8*04T 49611 510953- 209000 39332 6.127 3#43,0 13.873- 15,000 129500 20,834 1L,384 549166- 250000 4,166 59184 19153 19,8L6- LO.000 1,666 6.567 2.353 3.433- 50,000 89332 50*OUO- 270,000 45,000 389880 34,435 231*L20- 30,000 5,000 115 132 299886- 5,000 832 917 911 4.083- 5.000 832 5,000- 4,8LL*400 801,892 1,103,114 389,357 39708.287- 6,493,200 1082,190 1,109.382. 3959625 - 5.383.819 - PAGE 4 BALANCE 3AL 1.6t8.700- 100- 218,400- t0o- 140*7UO- 100- 29*120- 100- 29006,920- lUC- 52,280- LOU- 26*600- 100- 78,880- 100- 40,000- l00- 4U*000- 100- 3819120- too- 461#120- 100- 1#5469920- LOU- .764,800- 100- 88t,104- 99- 299628- - 99- 196759532- 100- 32,693- 8- Z,933,183-- 83- 279.081- 83- 51#953- 87- 139873- 69- 54,166- 72- 19,816- 79- 3.433- 34- 0 509000- 100- 2319120- 86- 29.885- 100- 4#083- 82- 5.000- LOG- O 0 0 0 39T08*286- 77- 59383,818- 83- PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND FEE REVENUE 46-000-00-4113 RtNTAL - DEPOT UPTAL FEE REVENUE PARKING REVENUE 46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION UNIT O1 46-000-00-42LZ 4ETER COLLECTION -UNIT 02 46-OUO-00-4213 SPACE RENT XILLE ST.LOT 46-000-00-4243 PARKING STUDY REIMB 46-UOO-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TITAL PARKING RcVENUE TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 48-000-00-4176 UiSPECTION SERVICES CHCS 46-000-00-4177 HUMAN SERVICES CHARGES 46-000-00-4178 PLANNING E ZONING CHGS 48-000-00-4119 POLICE DEPT CHARGES 48-000-00-4180 FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES 48-000-00-4181 STREET DIVISION CHARGES 48-000-00-4182 NATER FUND CHARGES 48-000-00-4183 PARKING FUND CHARGES 48-000-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 48-000-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT 48-000-00-4263 SALE OF P.X. EQUIPMENT 48-000-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT TJTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FOND --------------------------- RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENU= 49-ODO-00-4176 GENERAL FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4177 WATER FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4178 PARKING FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4179 LIBRARY FUND CHARGES 49-ODO-00-4241 EMPLOYEE CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4242 RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4143 LIBRARY CONTRIBUTIONS 49-OUO-00-4244 FLEXC9MP CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 44-000-00-4248 IVVESTMENT INCOME 49-000-00-4249 INTEREST - GIE 49-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 12,000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 129000 PAGE 5 19085.400- ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 29500 150 19500 19500 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 19500 250 1,500 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D Clint MO UNREC'O 21,666 A BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE UAL 2.880 480 480 O 2.400- 2.400- 83- 29880 480 480 0 2.400- 29400- 63- 82.000 13.666 12,720 59659 69.280- 69,2N0- 84- 66,000 119000 119804 59890 - 549196- 54.196- 81- 9 .GOO 1,500 960 100- 89040- 89040- 89- 79817 29500- 29500- 100- 10,000 1,666 0 09000 2,500 39496 31086 11.504- _. 129504- 7T- 172,000 28.666 Z8.980 14.635 143,0Y0- 1439020- 83- 174.880 299146 291460 149635 145.410- 145,420- 83- 12,000 2.000 129000 129000 1,0859400- 19085.400- 0 29500 150 19500 19500 179,550- 179*550- 0 19500 250 1,500 19500 3,600- 3.600- 0 1309000 21,666 130,000 130.000 61.000- 619000- 0 1359000 229500 1359000 135.000 56,394- _ O 1909000 _ 319666 1909000 190TOOO LOb,254- LU6,254- 0 879500 149582 87x500 877500 239091- 23,091- 0 89500 1.416 89500 89500 49838- 4.838- 0 5.000 832 29119 5.000- 59000- 100- 5.500 416 10.606 79817 29500- 29500- 100- 10,000 1,666 _ 109000- 209000- !00- 109000 19666 202 202 10.000- tO9000- 100- 5939500 989910 566.000 5669000 27.500- 279500- 5- 593,500 98,910 566.000 5669000 279500- 279500- 5- 1920b.000 201.000 120,600 120.600 1,0859400- 19085.400- 90- 199.500 33,Z50 19,950 199950 179,550- 179*550- 90- 49000 666 400 400 3,600- 3.600- 90- 61.000 10,166 61.000- 619000- 100- 679000 119166 109606 S9312 56,394- 56.394- 84- L269500 ZL,08Z 20,246 10014 LOb,254- LU6,254- 84- 309550 5,082 7.409 79409 239091- 23,091- 76- 6,000 L.O00 19262 578 49838- 4.838- 81- 25,000 4.166 29119 22.881- LZ9B81- 92- 1009000 L6.666 10.606 79817 89,392- 89092- 89- 59500 916 _ 5.500- 5.500- 100- 202 202 202 202 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30190 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL TJTAL SERVICE: CHARGE REVENUE I.83L.ODD 305.160 193.302 172.782 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT FUNU 1.8319000 305.160 193.302 172.782 CAPITAL IMPRV. C REPL. FUND TAX REVENUE 51-000-00-40L6 TAXES - CURRENT - 186.400 319066 51 -000 -OU -4017 TAXES - PRIOR 226.000 37.666 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 412.400 68.732 INTERFUNO TRANSFERS S1-000-00-4226 TRANS - GENERAL FUND 51-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 45.000 7.500 51-000-0074262 SALE JF FIRE EQUIPMENT 51-000-00-4263 SALE OF P.W. EQUIPMENT 51 -000 -UD -4264 SALE OF PNCE EQUIPMENT 51-ODU-00-4267 DEVELOPER DONATION LZU.000 .20.000 51-000-00-4268 HISTORICAL SOCIETY DOWN 30.000 5.000 TITAL INTERFUNU TRANSFERS 1959000 32.500 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRV. L REPL. FUND 6079400 101.232 -------------------------------------- CORPORATE PURPOSES CONST 1990 FEE REVENUE . 53-000-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 53 -000 -OU -4242 SALE OF BONDS -SERIES A 4.000.000' 666.666 53-000-00-4243 SALE OF BONDS -SERIES 8 53-000-00-4248 INTER -ST INCOME 25.000 49166 T'JTAL FEE REVENUE 4.025.000 670.832 TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES CONST 1990 4.025.000 670.832 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1987 OTHER REVENUE 54-000-00-4248 INTERLST INCOME TJTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN REUEVLPMT CONST 1987 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 FEE REVENUE 1.653 1#653 1*653 10653 10.346 8.411 10.346 8.411 11.999 10.064 UNREC.D BALANCE 1.63T.698- 1.637.698- 186.400- Z24.347- 410.74T- 34.654- 120.000- 30.000- 184.654- 595.401- 4.000.000- 25#000- 4.025:000- 4.025.000 - PAGE 6 BALANCE BAL 1.637.b98- 89- t.637.698- 89- 186.400- LOO- 224.347- 99- 410.747- t00- 0 34.654- T7- 0 0 0 120.000- 100- 30.000- 100- 184.654- 95- 595.401- 98- 0 4.000.000- 100- 0 25.000- 100- 4.025000- 100- 4.UZ5.000- 100- 0 0 0 55-000-00-4Lt3 MENTAL INCOME 55-000-00-4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 55-000-00-4248 iVTERtST INCOME 55-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME TOTAL FEE REVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN RtOEVLPMT CONST 1985 DOWNTOWN REOEVLPNT CONST 1940 OTHER REVENUE _ 56-0OU-00-4Z4Z SALE OF BONDS 56-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN R£DEVLPMT CONST 1990 ---------------------------------- CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E I 1973 TAX REVENUE 60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 60-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 60-ODO-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 60-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B 6 I 1973 ----------------------------------- CORPORATE PURPOSES B E I 1974 TAX REVENUE 61-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 6/-000-00-4023 TAXES - PRIOR 61-000-00-4164 °ERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 61-000-00-4249 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E 11974 --------------------------------- SSA 01 PROSPECT MEADOWS B E I TAX REVENUE 62-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 62-0&0-00-1#026 TAXES - PRIOR 6Z�000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD OZ ENDING 6/30/90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO UNREC-D % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL 139500 2.250 2.250 750 11.250- 1L.250- 83- 0 ?9500 19250 29381 992 5.113- 5.113- 68- 33 33 33 33 0 21.000 3.500 49670 19775 !6.330- 1693 -JO- 78- 219000 3.500 4.670 19775 16.330- 16.330- 78- 1.000.000 166.666 19000.000- 1.000.000- 100- 59000 832 59D00- 5.000- 100- 19005.000 167.498 19005.000- 1.0059000- 100- 1.005.000 L67.498 190059000- I.005.000- 100- 749700 129450 74.780- 749700- 100- 919400 150232 668 668 909T3Z- _ 90.732- 99- 59300 882 59300- 5930U- 100- 10.550 19758 1.844 905 8.706- 89706- 83- _ 181.950 30.322 2012 19573 179.438- 1799438- 99- 1819950 309322 2.512 19573 119.438- 179.438- 99- 118.500 L9.750 118.500- 118.500- 100- 1129550 20.424 897 897 t2i9653- L219653- 99- 8.400 L.400 8.400- 8.400- 100- 209000 3.332 39154 19547 L6.UN6- 16.846- 84- 2699450 449906 4905t 29444 265.399- 2659399- 98- 269.450 449906 4.051 29444 265.399- 2659399- 98- Li9T00 19950 1L9T00- 119700- 100- 11.800 1.966 15 15 11.785- 11.785- 100- 19000 500 601 294 29399- 29399- 80- DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B E 11990 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 65-J00-00-4227 TRANS - GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 8 U 65-UUO-00-4228 TRANS - O/T CONST 1990 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 48,500- 48,500- 100- ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 8,082 48,500- 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC•D 3 48.500- BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL TOTAL TAX REVENUE 26.500 4.416 616 309 25.884- 25.884- 98- TUTA_ SSA CI PROSPECT MEADOWS B E I ------------------------------------- 26,SJ0 4,416 616 309 25,884- 25,8H4- 98- SSA 12 BLACKFIAWK B E I 0 66-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 5'7,900 9,982 438 438 TAX REVENUE 59,462- 99- 6b-000-00-4248 IYTER�-ST INCOME 71600 19266 ' 498 63-000-00-4028 TAXES - CURRENT 159000 2,500 L3TAL TAX REVENUE 67,500 '15.J00- - 15.000- 100- 63 -000 -UD -4029 TAXES - PRIOR 14.500 .29416 21 21 14,479- 14.479- 100- 63-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 31200 532 6Z9 29b 2.571- 2,571- 80 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE - 32,100 5.448 650 317 32.050- 32,050- 98 - TOTAL SSA 82 BLACKMAWK 8 E I 3Z.700 59448 650 317 32,050- 32,050- 98 - CORPORATE PURPOSES 8 E I 1990 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 64-000-00-4227 TRANS - FLOOD CONTROL 305.000 50,832 305.OU0- 305.000- 100- 64-000-00-4228 TRANS - 1989A IMPRV C 64-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 20,000 3,332 20.000- 20,000- IOU - TOTAL INTERFUNU TRANSFERS 325,000 54,164 325,000- 325.000- IOU - TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOaES B E 11990 325.000 54.164 3Z5,000- 325,000- iU0- DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B E 11990 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 65-J00-00-4227 TRANS - GENERAL FUND U 65-UUO-00-4228 TRANS - O/T CONST 1990 43,500 8,082 48,500- 48,500- 100- T7TAL INTERFUNO TRANSFERS 489500 8,082 48,500- 48,500- 100 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B E I 1990 ----------------------------------------- 48,500 8.082 48.500- 48,500- 100- INSURANCE RESERVE 8 E I TAX REVENUE 66-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 0 66-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 5'7,900 9,982 438 438 59,462- 59,462- 99- 6b-000-00-4248 IYTER�-ST INCOME 71600 19266 19705 498 5,895- 5,895- 78- L3TAL TAX REVENUE 67,500 11,248 2,143 936 65,!57- 659357- 97 - TOTAL INSURANCE RESERVE B E I 679500 11,248 2,143 936 65,357- 65,357- 97- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/40 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC•O '4 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE 8 A DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT A L I 19870 TAX REVENUE 68-070-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 90,000 15.00U 90,000- 90,000- 1C0- 68-UOO-00-4039 SALES TAX INCREMENT 0 TJTAL TAX REVENUE 90,000 15#000 90.0UO- 90.000- LUO- INTERFUND TRANSFERS 68-000-00-4224 TRANS - 0/T CONST 1987D 24,000 4#000 56x936 32.936 31.936 L37 68 -000 -OU -4248 INTEREST INCOME 375 62 375- 375- 100- 68-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 0 TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS Z4*375 4.062 56.936 32.561 JZ*561 134 TOTAL 004NTUWN REDEVLPMT 8 L I 1987D ------------------------------------------ 114.375 19*06Z 56,936 57x439- 57.439- 50- P M FACILITY 8 G L 19878 TAX REVENUE 69-000-00-4019 TAXES -CURRENT 175*900 29,316 175*900- 1759900- 100- 69-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 178*750 _ 29*790 1,308 10308 177.442- L77.442- 99 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 35,*650 59,106 1x308 lv308 353.342- 353.342- 1UO- INTERFUND TRANSFERS 69 -000 -OU -4227 TRANS - CIRR FUND 0 69-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 179500 2x916 4*668 Z*279 12,832- IL#832- 73- 69-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 1 0 TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 17,500 299L6 4,668 20279 129832- 12,832- 73 - TOTAL P M FACILITY 8 . I 19878 -------------------------------- 3729150 62,022 59976 39587 3669174- 366,174- 98- DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT B 6 I 1987C INTERFUND TRANSFERS 70-OOU-00-4224 TRANS - O!T CONST 1967C 29,500 4*9L6 29.500- 29#500- LUO- ` 70-000-00-4225 TRANS - D/T CONST 1985 14093 14,593 14:593 149593 O 70-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME U 70-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME C TJTAL INTERFU4D TRANSFERS 299500 49916 14,593 14,593 14,907- 14,907- 51 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 E I 1987C ---'-------------------------------------"- 29.500 4,916 14#593 14,593 14.90T- L4.907- 51- PRICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 71-000-00-4049 TAXES - CURRENT LOO*000 L6#666 100.000- 100.000- 100- 71-OOU-00-4050 TAXES - PRIOR 2.000 332 413. 413 1.5d7- 1.587- 79- 71-030-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX C 71-000-00-4243 PULICi_MENS CONTRIBUTIONS 240.000 40,000 45#248 189028 194.752- 194.752- 81- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30190 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL POLICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 71 -000 -OD -4248 INTERfST INCOME 1,305,000 217.500 204.548 201.710 71-000-00-4249 OTHER T1-OOJ-00-4250 HANK INTEREST INCOME 5,000 832 1,290 1,290 71 -U00 -OO -4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT TITAL TAX REVENUE 1.652.000 275,330 251,499 2210#41 TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND 1,652,000 275,330 251.499 221.441 FIREMEWS PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE TZ70OU-00-4052 TAXES - CURRENT 50,000 8.332 72-000-00-4053 TAXES-PRIUR 14000 166 207 TZ -000 -OU -4243 FIREMEN•S CONTRIBUTIONS 232.000 389666 44.262 72-OOU-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1.465,000 2449166 2280418 72-000-00-4249 OTHER 72-000-00-4250 SANK INTEREST INCOME 5,000 832 1.376 72 -000 -Oil -4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT T'3TAL TAX REVENUE 197539000 292.1b2 2749283 TOTAL FIREMEN•S PENSION FUND 1.751.000 Z92,16Z 274,283 --------------------------------------- SSA 83 BUSSE-NILLE 8 E I TAX REVENUE 88-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 88-OOU-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 88-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME . TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA 03 BUSSE-MILLE 8 6 I SSA 04 BUSSE-MILLI B 6 I TAX REVENUE 89 -000 -UO -4019 TAXES - CURRENT 89-UUU-00-4010 TAXES - PRIOR 89-0'.;0-0U-4248 INTEREST INCOME TWAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA 84 BUSSE-MILLE B L I 13 13 13 Z07 17,818 226,454 1,376 245.855 245,855 T T 7 UNREC•O BALANCE 50,000- 193- 187,T18- 1,236,562- 3, 624- 1,478,717- t,478,717- 13 13 L3 PAGE 10 X BALANCE BAL. 1.100,452- 84- 0 3.Tt0- 74- 0 1.400,501- 85- 1940u,501- 85- 50.000- 100- 793- 79- 187,718- 81- L,236.582- 64- 0 3,624- 72- 0 1,478.717- 84- 1.478,717- 84- 13 L3 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 D 0 U VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL SSA C6 GEORGE/ALBERT 8 L I TAX REVENUE 94-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 16,200 94-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 16,000 94-ODO-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 800 94-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME TDTAL TAX REVENUE 319000 TOTAL SSA .06 GEORGEALBERT 8 E I 33,000 -------------------------------------- FLOOD LOAN 8 G I iNTERFUNO TRANSFERS '95-000-00-4227 TRANSFER GENERAL FUND TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS TOTAL FLOOD LOAN 8 L I ----------------------------------- PAGE 11 UNREC•D % BALANCE BALANCE UAL 2.700 I692U0- 16,200- 100- 2.666 142 142 15.858- 15x858- 99- 132 304 109 496- 496- 62- 0 5,498 446 251 32.554- 32x554- 99- 5.498 446 Z51 32,554- 329554- 99 - TOTAL ALL FUNDS 34.487,950 5,224,841 7,414,542 29883,033 s= 29,263.1i2- i9*263.109- 0 u C 114- FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 1990-91. Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM X BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOTAL PERSONAE SERVICES LT.500 29916 39000 1vSOL 14.500 14,500 83 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 399000 6.498 Z09284 Z9ZO4 18,716 189716 48 TOTAL COMMODITIES 49000 666 400 205 39600 3,600 90 TOTAL MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES 60.500 10.080 Z3.684 39910 369816 !69816 61 ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21500 416 75 29425 29425 97 TOTAL COMMODITIES Z50 40 150 250 L00 TOTAL ADVISORY 30ARDS AND COMMISSL 2.750 456 75 29675 29675 97 TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION 639250 10.536 239759 3.910 399491 39.491 62 VILLAGE MANAGERS OFFICE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES L669430 28.066 269185 119940 141.245 1429145 84 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 170050 2.838 2.007 L.T96 15.043 _ I5.043 88 TOTAL COMMODITIES L9BDD 300 I66 76 1*634 19634 91 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES L.000 166 1.000 1.000 100 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1880180 31.370 289358 139812 1591922 159.922 85 LEGAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 140.000 23.332 L891T3 169134 121,627 12L9827 87 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES L40.000 239332 180173 160134 121.82T LZL.821 87 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 6 TRAINING , TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 479020 79836 49065 39246 420955 420955 91 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,300 5.542 49316 39460 280984 189964 'BT TOTAL COMMODITIES 950 156 ZL8 69 73Z 732 77 TOTAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT G TRAIN 81.270 139534 8,599 60775 72.671 72.671 89 SALARY ADMINISTRATIUN TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 100000 19666 L09000 LO9000 100 TOTAL SALARY ADMINISTRATION 100000 1,666 L09000 109000 LOG TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE 4199550 69.902 55.130 3691ZL 364.420 3649420 87 CABLE TV UPERATIONS CABLE TV OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 83.4ZO 13.900 13.734 6*528 699667 69.686 B4 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES ZT0210 4.530 99706 1.745 17.505 1 179503 64 TOTAL COMMODiTIES 1L.440 19906 72 21 119368 7 119361 99 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9.500 1958Z 99500 9.500 100 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE L39400 29232 19340 19340 12,060 129060 90 TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS 1449970 24.150 249852 90634 1209120 8 1209110 63 TOTAL CABLE TV OPERATIONS 144.9TO 240150 Z4.85Z 90634 12091ZO 8 LZ091L0 83 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TUTAL CONTRA;TUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ACCOUNTING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL ACCOUNTING PURCHASING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL PURCHASING ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING DUPLICATING SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL DUPLICATING SERVICES TELEPHONE SERVICE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL TELEPHONE SERVICE INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL INSURANCE CUSTOMER SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES TOTAL CUSTJMER SERVICES CASH MANAGEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL CASH MANASEMENT PAGE 13 UNEXPENDED UNENCU4. L BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE UAL 60.686 609686 83 599691 L3 599678 9Z 5.693 5.693 88 2.000 29000 LOO 128.070 t3 128.057 88 63TS19 39279 750 67.548 17,631 600 1.900 Z09t3t 59.599 16,426 5.933 4,500 86,458 20,L26 79500 27,626 16,363 41.403 1,500 59,266 24,363 418,500 442,863 74,724 31.118 7,491 1139333 ZO,486 20.486 9 9 24 24 3 3 639519 T9 3.279 92 750 100 679548 79 179631 81 600 100 19900 100 209131 83 59.599 82 169426 85 5.924 99 4.500 100 0 869 449 84 20.126 81 7,476 100 27,602 85 L69363 T9 41.400 87 1,500 100 59,263 85 249363 81 418.500 90 442.863 89 74,723 80 31,118 96 7,490 94 t13T33t. 85 20,486 87 20,486 07 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 1990-91 Y -T -D T -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 72.920 I29t50 129234 5.651 64.600 109760 4.909 49524 6.500 1.082 Bol 204 29000 332 146.020 24.324 17,950 109379 809T25 139450 L7►206 69923 39550 590 271 32 750 124 859025 14,164 17.477 6,955 211800 3.632 49t69 1.696 600 too 19900 316 249300 49048 4x169 1.696 73,050 129170 139451 59681 19,400 3.232 29974 19694 6,000 1.000 67 4,500 750 t02.950 LT.152 16.492 7,375 15,000 4.166 4,874 19913 7.500 19250 32,500 59416 49874 1,913 20,625 3,436 4,262 19738 4IT500 7.916 6,097 396gZ L 9 500 250 69,625 11,602 10.359 5,420 30TI35 59020 5,772 2027 4659000 7T.498 469500 469500 495,135 8Z.518 529272 489827 939060 15,504 189337 79216 329500_ 5,416 1.382 379 89000 LT330 5t0 359 1339560 229250 ZOTZZ9 7.954 23,610 39932 3.IZ4 1,260 239610 3,932 3,124 17260 PAGE 13 UNEXPENDED UNENCU4. L BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE UAL 60.686 609686 83 599691 L3 599678 9Z 5.693 5.693 88 2.000 29000 LOO 128.070 t3 128.057 88 63TS19 39279 750 67.548 17,631 600 1.900 Z09t3t 59.599 16,426 5.933 4,500 86,458 20,L26 79500 27,626 16,363 41.403 1,500 59,266 24,363 418,500 442,863 74,724 31.118 7,491 1139333 ZO,486 20.486 9 9 24 24 3 3 639519 T9 3.279 92 750 100 679548 79 179631 81 600 100 19900 100 209131 83 59.599 82 169426 85 5.924 99 4.500 100 0 869 449 84 20.126 81 7,476 100 27,602 85 L69363 T9 41.400 87 1,500 100 59,263 85 249363 81 418.500 90 442.863 89 74,723 80 31,118 96 7,490 94 t13T33t. 85 20,486 87 20,486 07 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE14 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30190 1990-91 Y -T -D T -T -O CUR Md UNEXPENDEO UNENCUM 7C BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCU48ERED BALANCE NAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICFS 500 8l 500 500 100 TOTAL DEBT SERVICt EXPENSE 0 TOTAL NUN -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE 500 82 500 500 100 TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 19113.225 185.488 146.946 91.779 966x281 49 966,230 81 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT - TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 61,445 lO,Z36 11x175 4,563 50,270 - 50,270 82 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,2SO 5,370 7,648 6,705 24,602 2 24,600 76 TOTAL CUMMUOLIILS 5,000 832 950 819 4,050 2 4:048 8I TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 98,695 16,438 L9,713 12,087 78,-922 4 789918 80 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER . TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 459500 7,582 6,398 6,398 39,102 __ 399102 86 TUTAC COMMODITIES 29500 416 634 634 L,B66 L9866 75 TOTAL VILLAGE NcWSLETTER 48,000 1,998 7.032 7.032 40,968 40,968 85 TOTAL VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ---------------------------------------- 146,695 249436 26,805 19,119 119,890 4 119,866 BZ RISK MANAGEMENT RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TOTAL CUNTRA-_TUAL SERVICES IfT4I,000 290.160 2379504 I1R9849 1,503,496 2 1,503,444 86 TOTAL RISK MANASEMENT PROGRAM 1.741,000 290,160 237.504 114,849 1,503.496 2 L.5039494 86 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT ------------------- 1.741,000 2909160 237,504 1149849 1,503,496 2 19503,494 86 INSPECTION SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3619390 60.222 67,299 279198 294,091 - 294,U9L 81 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76,000 IZ9656 11,871 IO9Tl6 64,13L 6 649123 84 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8,300 1*318 565 325 79135 L 7,734 93 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 500 82 500 500 100 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 446.190 74,338 799735 38,859 366,451 7 3660*48 62 ENGINEERING SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 293,600 48.926 54,082 23,273 239,518 239,518 B2 TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL StRVICES 71,900 119974 9,551 99467 62,343 629343 87 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6.500 19082 392 244 6,lOd 6,108 94 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4,000 666 4.000 4,000 Lou TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 376,000 62,648 64,031 32.984 311,969 311.969 83 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 8229190 1369986 143,766 71,843 678,426 7 6789417 83 POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 46U,T55 769780 86,461 31,817 374,Z88 3749288 81 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 148.950 24,818 259800 17,643 123,151 3 123.147 83 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING, 6/30/90 1990-9/ T -T -D Y -T -D CUR NO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 99451 99451 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT ' 4.000 TOTAL COMMOOITIES [0.250 1.708 799 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.000 666 176,695 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 623.955 103.972 113.066 PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 186.672 186,672 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1.5659355 427.548 416,506 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 274,590 459762 879918 TOTAL COMMODITIES 29,250 4.870 1.915 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5.000 832 80 TOTAL PATROL ANO TRAFFIC ENFORCEMEZ.B74.195 479.012 566,339 CRIME PREV.. PUBLIC AND YOUTH SERV. 80 936 13.464 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1159290 19.210 23.401 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 149500 2,414 19036 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3,600 598 362 TOTAL CRIME PREY.. PUBLIC AND YOUT 1339390 229222 24,799 INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PROGRAM 428.430 90 39TOO TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 533.555 88.9L4 IOS.l25 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42.200 7.032 4.199 TOTAL COMMODITIES 2.000 332 256 TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE P 571,755 96.2T8 109.680 CROSSING GUARDS 389691 81 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES §8,000 89000 99308 TOTAL COMMODITIES 50o 82 39,192 TOTAL GROSSING GUARDS 413.500 89082 9,308 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS - 1429393 559557 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 529870 8.808 79518 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,250 33,204 1439693 TOTAL COMMUDITIES 124.oU0 20.664 15.687 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 13.200 29196 69170 TOTAL EUUIPMcNT MAINTENANCE E OPER 369,320 64.8T2 L73,068 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------- 4,647,115 T749438 996.260 FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 2389961 - 238,962 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 39883 44,T31 2 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 284,025 47.328 45,063 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 49.450 8.234 4,7[4 TOTAL COMMODITIES 32.800 5,466 481 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 15,290 21548 1.302 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 381,565 63,576 51,560 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS B1 22,257 ' Z089660 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,765.135 460.844 519,232 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 233.340 38.886 24.680 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11.760 1,956 547. TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 84.370 14.054 978 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 3.094,605 515,740 545.437 PAGE 15 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM Y BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 416 99451 99451 92 4.000 4,o00 too 49.936 510.890 3 510.866 91 176,695 2,0889850 2.0889849 HL 219330 186.672 186,672 66 768 27.335 2T.335 93 59000 39 4,961 99 _ 198093 Z.307.85T 39 2,307,817 80 89282 91.889 9L9889 80 936 13.464 13.464 .93 3.239 3,238 90 99218 1080592 1089591 81 399753 4289430 428.430 90 39TOO 379901 379901 90 213 1,744 19744 87 43,666 469,075 468,075 81 29923 389692 389691 81 500 500 -100 2,923 39.192 39,192 8t 29591 - 45.353 45,352 86 1429393 559557 559557 ' Z8 109045 [089313 20 108.293 87 3,750 7.030 1,030 53 158,765 216.153 20 116,231 56 463.3ZL ,3,650,859 62 3,650,793 79 189403 2389961 238,962 84 39883 44,T31 2 44,734 90 493 32,319 1 32,318 99 600 139988 1 13,987 91 23.379 330,006 4 330.OUL 86 2079848 2.245,903 2.2459903 B1 22,257 ' Z089660 41 2089619 89 86 11.213 5 [1,208 95 523 83939Z 17 83,375 99 230.714 2,549.168 63 19549,1U5 82 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6130/90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 50,398 50,398 81 FIRE PREVENTION 20,908 20.908 L3 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES &4, 405 38.224 46,699 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31.600 6*262 2.198 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,7L5 946 764 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.115 350 442 TOTAL FIRE VREV�tiTION Z74,835 45.782 50.103 CUM14UNICATIONS 39542 3,542 99 TOTAL CUNTRAGTUAL SERVICES 36.000 5.998 4.571 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9.825 1.636 271 TOTAL COMMUNICATIONS 45.825 7*634 4,842 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS 39276,091 94 3,Z759995 80 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 62,240 10,372 11,842 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 156.630 26.104 135,72Z TOTAL COMMODITIES 46.000 7*664 4.946 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 7.270 1.210 517 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 25.d57 259857 d4 TOTAL ErWIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPER Z729140 45.350 153.027 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 19500 ' 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3.000 500 ST7 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 31560 590 18 TOTAL COMMODITIES 910 ►50 235 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 7005 1.248 2.051 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 14.9T5 2.488 2.887 TOTAL FIRE E.ENERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 4.083,945 -------------------------------------- 680,510 807.856 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE POLICE E FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES TOTAL CONTRAZTUAL SERVICES 339,600 56.600 84.897 TOTAL VULICE E FIRE DISPATCH SERVI 339.600 56.600 849897 TOTAL CENTRAL DISPATCri SERVICE --------------------------------------- 339V6UO 56.600 84.897 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION INFORMATION, R"FERRAL9 E COUNSELING TOTAL PERSJNAL SERVICES 97,480 16,240 18.195 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3G9TT0 5.124 4*913 TOTAL COMMODITIES 4.550 156 38 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.500 250 TOTAL INFORMATION* REFERRAL. E COU 134*300 22,370 23.146 RECREATION AND EDUCATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 14,720 2,450 2.825 TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL SERVICES 2*315 384 1.538 TOTAL RECREATION AND EDUCATION 17.035 2.834 4,363 HUMEBOUND SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 50.TZ5 8*450 99782 18.U07 2*100 4T6 413 20.996 ZV58T 271 2,858 PAGE16 UNEXPENOEC UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE OAL 1Bz.707 Ldz,7u6 BU 35.402 35.402 94 4.951 3 49948 87 1.673 3 1.670 79 224.133 6 224.126 82 3tV429 31.429 87 91554 9V554 97 40,933 40.983 89 4.713 50,398 50,398 81 135,722 20,908 20.908 L3 3,198 41,054 41.054 89 SL7 6,753 6,753 93 0 144,150 119,113 119.113 44 23l 2.423 2,423 91 11 39542 3,542 99 ►69 675 675 74 11907 5.448 2i _ 5,427 72 2.318 tz,088 zi 12.U67 ei 4249415 39276,091 94 3,Z759995 80 281299 2549TU3 254,703 75 289299 2549703 254.703 75 289299 254.103 2549703 75 7*437 79,285 T9,285 81 4.057 25.d57 259857 d4 38 49SLZ 41512 99 19500 1*SUO 100 tI9532 LII,L54 LIl.t54 83 19138 LLV695 11,895 81 1,450 778 777 34 2V588 12.673 12,672 74 3.956 40.943 409943 8L VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17 ' BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD OZ ENDING 6/30/90 1400-9L Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM t BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION - - HOMEBOUND SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15x150 Z,524 1,699 1,000 13,451 L39451 99 TOTAL HOMEBOUND SERVICES 65,875 109974 11x481 49956 54,394 549394 83 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 389355 6,388 6,164 2,321 32,191 329191 84 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19650 272 153 61 t,497 19497 91 TUTAL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES 40,005 69660 69311 2,382 33,666 339686 84 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM _ TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 29805 466 467 234 2,338 29338 83 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL COMMODITIES _ 1,450 240 116- 1,566 1,566 108 TOTAL BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 4.255 706 351 234 39904 39904 91 SOCIAL AGENCIES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,500 39416 4,125 49125 16,375 164 16,111 79 TOTAL SOCIAL AGENCIES 209500 3,416 49125 49125 169375 I64 169211 79 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 2819970 46.960 499783 25,817 Z32#188 164 232,023 82 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES t3t,3LO 2L9880 23,668 89423 107,642 107,641 82 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 259250 40204 39897 3s5I5 21.351 _ 21,353 85 TOTAL COMMJ0ITIES 5,050 838 821 401 4,229 49229 84 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,000 166 1,000 10000 100 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 162:610 27,088 28.386 t29339 1340124 134,214 '83 ECONOMIC OtVELUPMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 51,165- 8,522 6,892 39037 449273 449273 87 TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.350 2,556 525 25 14,825 14,825 97 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20,000 3,332 20.000 209UUO t00 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 86,515 14,410 7:417 3#062 79.098 799098 91 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES L39800 2,298 4.012 19535 9,768 91788 71 TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL UONNTUWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF 13,800 20298 40012 19535 9,788 9.788 71 COBG ADMINISTRATION TOTAL PERSUNAL SERVICES 29#600 49930 6,039 Zs760 Z3.561 23,561 80 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11#625 1.932 1,552 734 109073 109073 87 TOTAL COMMODITIES 950-- 156 950 950 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 750 124 150 750 LOC TOTAL COSG ADMINISTRATION 41.925 791-42 7959t 39494 359334 359334 82 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS TOTAL CONTRA-TUAL SERVICES 6t9900 109314 11525 975 60,375 609375 98 TOTAL COBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 6L0900 10,314 1,525 975 60.375 60,375 98 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT CUBG ACCESSIBILITY L NEIGHBORHOOD IMPRVM TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 309,000 51,498 132 66 .408,868 3.258 305.610 99 TOTAL CO3G ACCESSIBILITY G NEIGHBO 309,000 51,498 132 66 309981.8 39256 305,610 99 CDBG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,400 566 404 L36 2,996 2,996 88 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1009000 (6,666 17,671 17,514 82,319 82,329 82 TOTAL CU.1G RESIJENTIAL REHABILITAT 103,400 17,232 18.OT5 17,650 85,325 85,325 83 CD3G COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 7,500 L,Z50 579 Lt3 6.92t - 6.921 92 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 59000 832 5,000 50000 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20,000 31332 20,000 ZO,000 lot) TOTAL CD9G LOMALRLIAL REHABILITATI 31.500 5,414 579 113 31,921 3t,9ZL 98 COBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITATION . TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 75 19 T5- 75- 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 40,000 6,666 40,ODU 40,000 L00 TOTAL COHG MULTI -FAMILY REHABLLITA 40,000 6,666 75 19 39,925 39,925 100 CD!{(; DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 50 50 50- 50- 0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES O TOTAL CDOG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 50 50 50- - 50- 0 TOTAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT --------------------------------- 852,650 142,062 67,842 390303 7849808 39258 T819550 - 92 STREET DIVISLUN ADMINISTRATION ANO SUPPORT - TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 20b,585 349420 36,5t9 15,940 170.066 170,066 32 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 104,500 17,412 109046 9.259 94,454 94,454 90 TOTAL COMMOO1TIEi 14.000 2,332 3081 1,519 tO.1L9 L 10,218 73 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,500 416 29500 1,100 U TOTAL AUMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 327,585 54,580 529846 27.818 274.739 1 274,738 84 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 20U.820 33,466 349983 L3.043 165,837 L650837 Bi TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 87,500 14,578 1.741 1,665 85,759 65,759 98 TOTAL COMMODITIES 86,300 14076 9,910 6,563 76,391 47 76.343 88 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 34000 6,580 399500 39,500 100 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 0 TOTAL MAINT:.NANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDI 414,120 69,000 4b,634 219271 367,46T 47 367v4,9 B9 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 12o9455 21,074 31.156 14,103 95.249 95,299 75 TOTAL CONTRA;.TUAL SERVICrS 27.500 4.582 6,300 21100 21,200 5 21,195 77 TOTAL COMMODITIES b.950 L.L54 1.082 461 5.868 5,868 84 TOTAL CAPITAL FXPENDITURES 4.200 698 17 77 4,123 4 4,119 98 TOTAL MALNT,NANCE OF GROUNDS Lby,105 279508 38,b15 16,747 1269490 9 126,481 77 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6000ET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 17)0-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO dUOGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL STREET DIVISION 25.567 UNENCUM STREET MAINTENANCE BALANCE ENCUMBERED TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 80,325 14.716 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 118.300 19.714 TOTAL COMMODITIES 36.600 6.096 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,99!.250 3329204 TOTAL STaEET MAINTENANCE 29236.475 372.730 SN:)W REMOVAL 1.9179336 96 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 95,710 15,948 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 7.000 I.lb4 TOTAL COMMODITIES 859000 14,164 TUTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20,000 3,332 TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL 2079710 34,608 LEAF REMOVAL 209000 57,958 TUTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 71,840 11,972 TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 209000 3,332 TOTAL COMMODITIES 149300 2,380 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 19,944 TOTAL LEAF REMOVAL 106.140 17,684 STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENANCE 14,300 100 TUTAL PERSONAL StRVICES 47,050 79840 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 93,850 159638 TOTAL COMMODITIES 13.850 2,306 TOTAL STORM SEWER ANO BASIN MAINTE 154,750 25,784 FORESTRY 800 92,775 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 199,760 33.288 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2169250 37,702 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8,600 1,430 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 161,734 TOTAL FORESTRY 4349610 72,410 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 99 5,167 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 449970 7.494 TOTAL COMMODITIES 23,700 3,946 TOTAL CAPITAL eXPENDITURES 1.000 332 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 70*670 11,772 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION 31,936 71 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3„385 6.060 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.000 1,666 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9.300 1,550 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 12,500 2.062 TOTAL PUILIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATIO 60.t85 11.358 MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAYS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 11,165 1,860 TOTAL CO'JTRACTUAL SERVICES 119800 3,630 TOTAL COMMODITIES 28,000 4,662 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF STATE HIGHWAY 60,965 10,152 18.862 t0,609 50904 59904 5.591 59591 659342 659178 95.699 81,282 6,560 1,954 6,560 19954 19442 940 57 57 1.499 9.173 275 19368 10,816 38.026 1,052 3.433 42.511 139034 1,492 149 14, 675 10,818 194 488 11,500 1.527 3,007 997 2.922 275 1,368 4.565 20,256 888 1.759 22.903 4,621 78Z 5,403 PAGE 19 UNEXPENDED 25.567 UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL 699463 100 69.463 79 112,397 957 t1L9439 94 319OU9 21 309988 d5 199279909 109572 1.9179336 96 2,140.778 119550 2,1Z9,226 95 89.150 67 89915U 93 7.,)DO 21.700 7.000 100 85,000 6 85.Oo0 100 209000 57,958 20.000 100 201,150 2DL.ISO 97 TU,399 70,398 98 19,944 19,943 100 14,300 14,300 100 0 104.643 104,641 99 37.677 37,877 dl 939575 800 92,775 99 12,482 129482 90 143,934 800 143.134 92 1619734 161,734 at 2259t98 19070 214.118 99 5,167 7 59L6C bU 0 392,099 1,077 391.022 90 31.937 31,936 71 22,108 22.208 94 1,851 L.85I 93 S5.996 55,995 79 4,908 25.567 25,/67 7U l0.UJ0 100000 100 L94 9.106 7 9,099 98 12.012 11,012 96 5.102 56,685 7 56,678 63 306 9.6d5 91685 67 21.800 100 21.700 too 19527 Z6,473 6 269467 95 1,833 57,958 106 57.852 95 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL STREET DIVISION 94.356 94.356 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 190.000 5.000 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES t13.905 18,978 19049 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 195.000 32.498 190.000 TOTAL COMMODITIES 130.500 21.746 17.415 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.500 748 216.933 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 443005 73*970 226.964 PU:1L VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 82 - 5.500 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 5,635 1.L36 1.215 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 5,500 914 90 TOTAL COMMODITIES 12.000 1,998 1.188 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.500 250 52 TOTAL PUJC VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 259835 4.298 2.403 TRAFFIC SIGNALS C STREET LIGHTING 5.891 96 2,149 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 6,115 1,018 224 TOTAL CUNTRA-'TUAL SERVICES 244.000 40.998 2.149 TOTAL COMMODITIES 61000 11000 271 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 185,000 30,830 440.472 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS t STREET LIG 443,t15 13,846 2.644 TOTAL STREET DIVISION ---------------------------------------- 5,15'?.LTO 859,710 556,373 NATER AND SEWER DIVISION 190.291 190,291 ADMINISTRATIUN AND iUPPORT 60.661 583.406 4 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2319585 38,586 41.294 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 6670600 L11.254 84.194 TOTAL COMMODITIES 25,500 4.246 59924 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.500 416 900 TOTAL D£riT SERVICc EXPENSE 5901530 98,416 48.133 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1,517,715 Z52,9t8 180,445 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS 37:344 85 182 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 439810 7.300 69470 TUTAL CONTRA- TUAL SeRVICES 139500 29246 182 TOTAL COMMODITIES 14.500 2,414 284 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2,500 414 67,374 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDI 7,„ 310 12, 31,t 6,936 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS Z7,U99 75 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 36,135 6.016 9,036 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5.400 900 385 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3,700 616 3.472 TOTAL MAINT;_NANLE OF GROUNDS 459235 7.532 12.893 NATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE E REPAIR 135.643 84 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Lb1,535 26.920 25.892 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 104.000 17,332 11.490 TOTAL COMMODITIES 20.500 3.416 2.384 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 0 24,U75 TOTAL WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE G R 266*035 47.668 39,766 PAGE 20 UNEXPENDEU UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMSLR4Q BALANCE 8AL 9.100 94.356 94.356 83 190.000 5.000 5.000 3 10.674 113.085 8 It 3.077 87 4.500 4000 100 209.774 LL6,941 8 216.933 49 464 5,640 5,620 82 - 5.500 50 5,450 99 676 10,012 2 10.810 90 1,500 11560 LOU L,140 23,432 52 23,360 9C 224 5,891 5.891 96 2,149 243,651 _ 143,851 99 27t 5,730 5.729 95 185.060 185,000 LOU 2,644 440.472 440,471 99 409,433 4,602.80* 13,651 4,5899140 59 159845 190.291 190,291 82 60.661 583.406 4 583.402 87 3,523 199576 1 19.575 77 900 1,600 1,606 b4 489133 _ 542,396 542.397 92 L299U62 1,337.271 5 1,337,265 88 Z.73T 37.340 37:344 85 182 13,318 15.318 99 48 14,216 14,216 98 2,400 2.500 100 29967 67,374 679374 91 6.OtT 27.099 Z7,U99 75 385 5,OL5 59015 93 228 2 216 6 6.402 32,342 2 321340 71 10033 135,643 135.643 84 11,3Z5 91.510 3 929507 89 29Z17 18.116 8 t8.t08 8d 0 24,U75 24b.269 it 246*258 8b VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 21 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 - 1900-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CIM MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM R BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED aALATICE DAL. MATED AND SEWER OIVISION WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. E REPR. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 145.580 24.260 8.837 4.020 136.743 136.743 94 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43.950 7.322 11.426 1.511 32.524 TB 32:446 74 TOTAL COMMODITIES 49.950 8.314 4.113 2.012 45.837 30 459807 92 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 107.500 17.914 10- 18 tOT.510 555 106*955 99 TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. E 34x.980 57.820 24.366 T.562 322.614 603 321.951 93 WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 81!.045 149672 33.758 !2.548 54.187 549287 62 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19250 206 81 BL L.169 1.169 94 TOTAL COMMODITIES 369550 69090 L9321 869 35.ZZ9 359219 96 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 10.000 19666 10.000 tO.DUO t00 TOTAL WATER VALVE AND HYURANT MAIN 135.845 22.634 35.160 t39498 1009685 1009685 74 WATER METER LNSTAL.RcPR.E REPL. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 16.695 12.780 14.391 6,839 62.304 _ 6Z93U4 81 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,000 69164 39311 393IL 33.689 312 334367 90 TOTAL COMMODITIES 84,600 14,096 19237 1909Z 83,363 742 _ 820621 98 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 25.000 4.166 -15.000 25.OuO LOU TOTAL WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.E RE 2239295 37,206 189939 II924Z 204.356 1.064 203:292 91 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES t3U.1L5 21.678 11.328 9.378 108.781 108.767 84 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90.500 159082 87.668 87,636 29832 298.32 3 TOTAL COMMODITIES 999700 169614 119416 99179 889184 9 889275 89 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 39000 500 3.000 39000 100 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPER 323.315 539874 120.412 106.193 202.903 9 1029894 b3 SANITARY SEWER MAINT. E REPAIR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 7U 9040 119670 14.320 59413 559720 55.710 80 TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL SERVICES 18.950 3.156 18,950 18.950 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES 119000 1,832 734 571 10.266 10 109256 93 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPE?IDITUkES 61.000 10.164 61,000 61,000 100 TUTAL SANITARY SEWER MAINT. E REPA 16).990 26,822 15.054 5.984 145.936 LO 1459926 91 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 444.000 73.998 104.906 36.746 339,094 195 338.899 76 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 444.000 73.998 1049906 36.746 339.094 195 3369899 76 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 30000 500 3.000 3.000 t00 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Z5 25 25- 25- C TOTAL CAPITAL EXPE'IDITURES 105.000 17.500 1.280 19280 1039720 103.720 99 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 1089000 18.000 19305 19305 106,695 106.695 99 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 29750 456 2.750 29750 100 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 3.035.000 505.832 343,712 236091 2.691.288 29691.188 R9 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3.000 L.332 8.00U 6.000 L00 TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISIT3.0459750 5079620 343,712 236#391 29702.038 29702.038 89 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 6#7119470 19118.466 903,894 581,427 59807.577 1.959 5,905,617 87 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING' 6J3U/90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIVATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PAGE 22 UNtXPtNOEO UNENCUM X BALANCE ENCUMBERED 6ALANCE 3 A --------------------------- PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 129325 29054 2.853 948 9,472 9.47Z 77 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42#850 791313 11.803 11*425 31.047 31#047 72 TOTAL COMMODITIES 0 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 55!175 9.I92 14,656 12.373 40.519 40#519 73 PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 4.370 7Z8 ZLO 4s16U 4.t6U 95 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10#200 1,698 352 352 9,848 9.848 97 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5#800 964 355 LB3 5.445 5,445 74 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES - I32,000 21.996 36.580 36,580 959420 634 94.5bo 72 TOTAL PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 1529370 25.386 37.497 37,115 114,873 834 114,039. 75 TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ------------------------------------- ZU7,545 34078 52,153 49,488 155,392 834 154,558 74 ENGINEERING DIVISION PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING - TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING 0 TOTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION --------------------------------"--------- 0 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL TOTAL PE4SONAL StRVICES 1'0#250 3.204 3064 774 L5.886 159866 83 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 2#091,000 348,496 184,992 16T9750 1,90b*008 728 1,985,280 91 TOTAL COMMODITIES IL2,500 L8,T46 17,818 94.682 27 94,655 84 TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL Z#ZZZ,750 370,446 Z06, L74 168.524 2,016.576 T55 2015,821 91 TUTAC REFUSE OISP,ISAL DIVISION -------------------------------------- 2.222#750 370,446 206.IT4 168,524 29016,576 755 2,0150821 91 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS DOWNTOWN REUEVELOPMcNT CONSTRUCTION TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 993.735 165.618 1#800 19800 991,935 991,935 LOU TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 102,000 16#998 71,529 14,593 30,471 30#471 30 TOTAL UUWNTOWN RLDEVELOPMcNT CONSTI#095,735 L82,6L6 73,3Z9 lb*393 !9022#406 I,OZ2#406 93 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4,025,000_ 670.832 4,015,000 4,OZ5,0UU LOO TOTAL FLOUR CONTROL PROJECTS 4#025,000 670,832 4,025,000 4.025.000 Lou COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,000 21000 12,000 12,000 1DO TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 22J.000 36,666 42,047 39.507 177.994 3T3 177.620 81 TOTAL OE8T SERVICE EXPENSE 0 TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 232#000 .18.666 42.007 390507 189,994 3T3 189,61U 82 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 23 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30190 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO UNFXFENOED UNENCUM % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL - BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL EQUIP 6 IMPRVMNTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES ISJ.000 25.000 150.000 69 149.931 100 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 305.000 50.832 305,000 305.000 100 TOTAL GENERAL EQUIP 6 IMPRVMNTS 455.000 75,832 455,000 69 454.931 100 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 469.200 18.192 17.615 179615 451.585 1.230 450.355 96 TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL 46'3,200 78,192 17,615 17,615 4519585 I,Z30 4500355 96 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS --------------------------- 6,27b,935 1.046,138 132.951 73,515 6.143,985 1,872 69142,312 98 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES C014MUNITY GROUPS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 149500 2,416 5,260 4.660 9,240 86 99154 63 TOTAL COMMUNITY GROUPS 14.500 2,416 5.260 4.660 9.240 86 9,154 63 4TH OF JULY 6 CIVIC EVENTS, ETC. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 15.000 2.496 15.000 15,00G LOO TOTAL CUNTRAuTUAL SERVICES 21,000 3.496 10.270 60 10,730 10,730 51 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10,950 1,822 980 9,970 8 9.962 91 TOTAL 4TH OF JULY L CIVIC EVENTS, 469950 7.814 11.250 60 35,700 8 35,692 76 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 29950 490 2,950 21950 100 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,500 1,750 10.500 10000 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1.000 166 1,000 1,000 - 100 TOTAL HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 14.450 2.406 14,450 149450 100 TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ------------------------------------------ 759900 12,636 16.510 49720 59,390 94 59.296 78 LIBRARY SERVICES LIBRARY OPERATIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2,546.920 424.484 1.546.920 2,546,920 100 TOTAL LIBRARY OPERATIONS 2154b.920 4249484 _ 29546,9ZO 2.5469920 100 TOTAL LIBRARY SERVICES ----------------------------------------- 295469920 424.484 29546,920 29546,9ZO 100 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL OBLIGATION 9ONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVIC- EXPENSE 1.282.350 213.714 170,469 166.824 1,111,881 !.!11,881 ST TOTAL GENERAL 01,4LIGATION BONDS 19282,350 213.714 170.469 166.824 1.111Vddl 191119881 87 SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS = TOTAL DEBT SERVILE EXPENSE 85,905 14.314 16,806 16,806 69,099 69,099 80 TOTAL SPECIAL StRVICE AREA BONDS 85.905 14,314 16,806 169006 b9.099 699099 80 TOTAL DEBT SERVILE FUNDS 1.368,255 Z28V02B 187.275 1839630 1.180,980 1.180.980 86 PENSION FUNDS EMPLOYEE PENSIONS TOTAL OEBT SERVICE EXPFNSE TOTAL EMPLOYEE PENSIONS POLICE PENSIONS TUTAL DEBT SERVICL EXPENSE TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS FIREMENS PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL FIREMENS PENSIONS TOTAL PCNSION FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6l3Ul90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO &UDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 741.600 123,596 130.534 53,934 74L.600 123.596 1309534 539934 1.652,000 275,330 83.008 430#64 1.b52,000 275,330 83.006 431464 1,753,000 292916Z 84,871 43,279 1.753#000 292,162 64,871 43,219 4,146,600 691,038 298.413 140#677 PAGE 24 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERtO BALANCE BAL 611:066 611.066 82 61t,066 6119066 82 1.568,992 1,568,992 95 1.568,992 1,568.992 95 1,668.129 1,668,129 95 1.668,129 1.668,129 95 3,848,187 398489167 93 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 02 ENDING 6/30/90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUat TfITAL BUDGET LXPENS£ 43*371,705 5,019,143 7,ZZ7,862 Z•940.4Z4 Village of,,- aunt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 26, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS C RETAIL PACKAGE LIQUOR LICENSE ONE OF THE UNITS AT BRENTWOOD SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER There has been a request by Mr. Bradley Hohn, who is the President of Kensington Corporation, which would like to have consideration for a Retail Liquor License at the Brentwood Square Shopping Center. Mr. Hohn and one other individual, a Kathleen Stein who is a financial investor in the corporation, were in my office. I fully explained the posture of the Village concerning liquor sales and the reluctance of the Board to automatically grant Retail Liquor Licenses. The individuals involved indicated to me that at the present time, they plan to be part of the United Liquor Stores, as an affiliate. They anticipate having hours from 10:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. and in addition to the retail package sales, they anticipate also providing delivery services. They feel that the senior population in town would support a delivery service. Mr. Hohn has not had a Liquor License in his name, although he has had over five years of experience; in particular with wines. He, as well as Ms. Stein, have also worked in restaurants. They anticipate taking about one-half of the old Ace Hardware space which is about 5,000 square feet and they would anticipate it would take about two weeks for them to be prepared in order to move in and stock the establishment. The granting of this License would then mean that we would have three Liquor Licenses at the Brentwood Shopping Center, assuming that the Class R License for the Oriental Restaurant would be granted. N JOHN FULTON DI�ON JFD/rcw attachment ORDINANCE NO: AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: S=QN ONE, That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby farther amended by increasing the number of Class "C" liquor licenses by one (1) (United Liquor Mart, Brentwood Square Shopping Center, and increasing the number of Class "R" liquor licenses by one (1) (Dragon City, 1716 Brentwood Square), so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows: Section 13,107, Numbgr of Licenses: Three (3) Class A Licenses Two (2) Class B Licenses Eleven (11) Class C Licenses One (1) Class D License Two (2) Class E Licenses One (1) Class G License One (1) Class H License One (1) Class M License Two (2) Class P Licenses Fifteen (15) Class R Licenses Ten (10) Class S Licenses One (1) Class T License Nine (9) Class W Licenses $—E-CTJON TWO• That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: PASSED and APPROVED this ATTEST: day of Village President Village —Clerk Irl 1990. Class Es ablishment Number A McBride's; Midwest liquors; Mrs. P & Me 3 B Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn 2 C Alvee's liquors; Bolzano liquors; Dominick's (83 & Golf); Gold Eagle liquors; The Liquor Shoppe; Mt. Prospect liquors: Osco Drugs; Phar-Mor; United Liquor Mart: Walgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza) 11 D Prospect Moose Lodge 1 E Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's Banquet Hall 2 G Mount Prospect Park District-Golf Course 1 H Zanie's 1 M Holiday Inn 1 P Arlington Club Beverage; Shirnada Shoten 2 R Artemis; DJB Brunetti; DragQn City, Edwardo's; Fellini; Giordano's; House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; little America; Pepe's; Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise; Torishin; Yasuke 15 S Carlisle; El Sombrero; Evans; Jake's Pizza; Kampai; Old Orchard-Greenview; Reunion; Sam's Place; Second Dynasty; Wild Stallions Cafe 10 T Thunderbird Lanes I W Mickey's Diner; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut (Algonquin Rd); Pizza Hut (Euclid); Rosati's Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's 9 59 Village of .,_lclulnt PrKclapect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR LIQUOR LICENSE AT BRENTWOOD SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER There was a request made by John & Kin Corporation, which are John Moy and Kin Chan, who are requesting a Class R Liquor License for consumption at dining tables for a Chinese restaurant which they anticipate opening up in September at the Brentwood Square Shopping Center. The size of the establishment is approximately 1400 square feet and it would be two stores down from the existing Photos' Hot Dogs. They are requesting a license for liquor although they have had experience working in and, in fact, owning Chinese restaurants in the past. They have not had a liquor license. The establishments they have owned were carry -out Chinese food. They anticipate having a Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese food specialties. They will be opening for the lunch hour and up until 9:30 on weekdays and 10:30 on weekends. They are not interested in liquor sales to take place without food service at the table. They are U. S. citizens and are in the process of contacting the Police Department for fingerprints and other information they need as far as the State license is concerned. The Brentwood Square Shopping Center has been having some problems with leasing up their spaces and has had a major tenant, the Ace Hardware already close its establishment at this Center. This is now the third request for a Liquor License in this shopping center. Photos' Hot Dogs already has a beer and wine license. There is a request that has been made verbally, although they have not come forward, for a package liquor store in this shopping center and this is now the third request, however, this is connected with a full service restaurant. If this were to be granted, I believe there would be more than sufficient licenses at this one shopping center and we should seriously review whether or any additional Liquor Licenses should be granted at this particular shopping center. The Chinese restaurant that was operated by the Chan family was China City in Chinatown at 6207 South Kedzie. JFD/rcw attachment Village ©f ''bunt Prospect Moun,,,erospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM" TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT TO THE VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JULY 10, 1990 SUBJECT: LIQUOR LICENSE REQUEST - CLASS R GIORDANO'S, 1800 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD (FORMERLY CROSSROADS RESTAURANT) On Monday; July 9, Michael V. Scamarcia, of VMB Enterprises, Inc., d/b/a Giordano's, 1800 South Elmhurst Road, submitted the Liquor License application for a Class R (Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only) License. Mr. Scamarcia has been operating the Giordano's Restaurant located at 820 East Rand Road for the past two years with no history of a derogatory nature. A misunderstanding occurred when Mr. Scamarcia was under the impression that because he owned another restaurant in Mount Prospect and the former business had a Liquor License that a Liquor License would be automatically granted upon his submittal of the Liquor License application. Giordano's has been doing an extensive amount of work for the past few months in remodeling and bringing the restaurant up to Code and Mr. Scamarcia assumed that as soon as a Certificate of Occupancy was issued, he would automatically secure his Liquor License. Giordano's is planning on opening the restaurant Friday, July 13. They are aware that no alcoholic beverages can be served until they secure a Liquor License. The application is in order, all fees have been paid and all required documents have been received. It is the recommendation of the Village Manager's office that the second reading of the Ordinance be waived at the July 17 meeting of the Village Board. Giordano's is a well- established business and we foresee no problems with their securing a Liquor License immediately. Mr. Scamarcia has been instructed to be present on Tuesday, July 17, to answer any questions or concerns the Board may have regarding the issuance of a Class R Liquor License for this establishment. Roberta C. Wintercorn attachment E 0 F MO U N I ZJ&S q P E C UOLM C0NTRQL!QQhfl9SSION APPLI ON kIL LIQUO EALER'S LLC=E RENEWAL DATE 3-_A0-40 NEW vl---(JlSO Non-Reftndable Application Fee for issuance of WE Liquor License; one-time only fee) Honorable Gerald L Farley,Village President and Local liquor Control Commissioner Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois Pursuant to the provisions of the Municipal Code of Mount Prospect of 1957, known as Section 13.103, passed by the Board of Trustees of said Village on the 15th day of January, 1957, as amended, regulating We of alcoholic liquors in the Village of Mount Prospect, County of Cook, State of Illinois: The undersigned, hereby makes app ct1 a on or a liquor dealer's license for the —period ending U April 30, 19, and tenders the sumo forth in the following: .2000, the prescribed fee as set SCHEDULE OF ANNUAL FEES FOR THE VARIOUS CLASSES OF RETAIL LIQUOR DEALERS' LICENSES (SECTION 13.106): Annual Fee CLASS A-- Retail package and consumption on premises $ 2,500.00 CLASS B: Consumption on premises only 2,000.00 CLASS C: Retail package only 2,000.00 CLASS D: Non-profit private clubs, civic or fraternal organizations; consumption on premises only 750.00 CLASS E: Caterer's license 2,000.00 CLASS G: Park District Golf Course; beer and wine; limited number of special events to include full service bar facilities; consumption on premises only 00.00 CLASS H: Supper Club; offering live entertainment 2,000.00 CLASS M: Hotels, motels, motor inns, motor lodges; retail package and consumption on premises 2,500.00 CLASS P: Retail package - refrigerated and non - refrigerated beer and wine only - no consumption on premises 1,750.00 CLASS R: Restaurant - consumption at dining tables only 2,000.00 CLASS S: Restaurant with a lounge 2,500.00 CLASS T: Bowling Alley 2,500.00 CLASS V: Retail package - wine only 1,500.00 CLASS W: Restaurant - consumption of beer or wine only and at dining tables only 1,500.00 SURETY BOND REQUIRED 1,000.00 EACH LICENSE TERMINATES ON THE 30TH DAY OF APRIL Your petitioner, doing business as respectfully requests permission to operate a retail liquor business at Mount Prospect, Illinois. Description and name of remises: (Description must be complete as to floor area, frontage, etc.) Is applicant owner of premises: A10 If not owner, does applicant have a lease? V6 -r State date applicant's lease expires: 2010 - If not owner, attach copy --ease I—ease hereto. Does applicant have a management contract with another person or entity for the operation or management of the licensed premises? No If so, state the name and address of the manager or management company. . (The manager or management company must completi the same application as the owner). Is applicant an individual,EErp:o:ra�tioA a co -partnership or an association? (Circle one) If an individual, state your name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number: If co -partnership, state name, date of birth, address, telephone number and Social Security Number of each person entitled to share in the profits thereof: If a co -partnership, give the date of the formation of the partnership: If a corporation, give state and date of incorporation: -.-ZX4. 11V&XA14#1PaV MAWW '90 If a corporation incorporated in a state other than the State of Illinois, indicate date qualified under Illinois Business Corporation Act to transact business in Illinois: If a corporation, give names, addresses, dates of birth, telephone numbers and Social Security Numbers of Officers and Directors. Also, list the names, addresses, dates of birth and Social Security Numbers of shareholders owning in the aggregate more than 5% of the stock of such corporation. N OFFICE AND/OR PERCENT OF STOCK HELD Ouma V ji2r oqtrr�v AN6 Wf% Date of Birth: 27-67 Social Security # __;37-5;Z-7270 Phone #268-69B-9743 Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone # 76�i - � 6&0 3 Date of Birth: Social Security # Phone # (Additional information to be included on a separate listing.) Objects for which orgar pion is formed: If an individual, a co -partnership, a corporation or an association, has the applicant or any of the partners, incorporators, directors, officers, agents or stockholders ever been ,convicted of a felony or a misdemeanor? —_&L_ If so, explain: If applicant is an individual, state age: Marital status: MA4A19 Is applicant a citizen of the United States?� If a naturalized, citizen, state date and place of naturalization: How long has applicant been a resident of Mount Prospect, continuously next prior to I the filing of this application? NI)IJ- Lc-� mrA= Telephone no. State character or type of business, of applicant heretofore: &Sl2f4fta- 0j,ble IgO 6 State amount of goods, wares and merchandise on hand at this time: How long has applicant been in this business? lyi( Is the applicant an elected public official? MQ If so, state the particulars thereof. Is any other person directly or indirectly in applicant's place of business an elected public I— official? Nu In the case of an application for the renewal of a license, has the applicant made any political contributions within the past 2 years?NO If so, state the particulars thereof - Does the applicant hold any law enforcement office? Xffi If so, designate title: Does - the applicant -possess 'a current Federal Wagering -or Gambling Device Stamp? If so, state the reasons therefor:_ Has applicant ever been convicted of a gambling offense as presented by any of subsections (a) (3 through a) (10) of Section 28-1, or as prescribed by Section 28-3 of the "Criminal Code of 1961" as heretofore or hereafter amended? �Jo If so, list date(s) of said conviction(s): Has applicant ever made similar application for a similar or other license on premises other than described in this application? __ALD If so, state disposition of such application: Is applicant ualified to receive State and Federal license to operate an alcoholic liquor business? Has applicant ever had a previous license revoked by the Federal government or by any state or subdivision thereof? JJD If so, explain: Is applicant disqualified to receive a license by reason of any matter or thing construed by this Ordinance, the laws of this State or other Ordinances of this Village? M 0 Does applicant agree not to violate any of the laws of the State of Illinois, the United States of America or any of the Ordinancls of the Village of Mount Prospect in the E conduct of his/her place of business? \ E ,-, Does applicant currently ( y Dram ShopInsurance coverage '� If 'Yes," attach COPY. If applicant is not the owner of the premises, does the owner thereof carry Dram Shop Insurance wverage?<If the answer to either of the foregoing questions is "No," no license shall issue,� Does Sure and by Ordinance accompany this application at the time of filing? State name and address of each surety next below: Give name, address, date of birth, telephone number and Social Security Number of manager or agent in charge of premises for which this application is made: LO , (IfATA, L SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT ,e4 Corporate Seal (If applicant is corporation) Who, first being duly sworn, under oath deposes and says that —he is/are the applicant(s) for the license requested in the foregoing application; that lie_ is/are of good repute, character and standing and that answers to the questionsaskedin the foregoing application are true and correct in every detail. STATE OF ILLINOIS Ss. 40OUNTY OF C400K Subscribed and Sworn to before me this C/ -/A. day of % *��. ,A.D., 19LO "OFFICIAL SEAL" JOHN R. HOLZER Notary Public, State of Illinois My Commission Expires 3123193 APPLICATION APPROVED; Local Liquor Control Commissioner ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTJON ONE: That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by increasing the number of Class "R" liquor licenses by one (1) (Giordano's, 1800 South Elmhurst Road), so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13 shall be and read as follows: ion. 13,107, - Number of Licens Three (3) Class A Licenses Two (2) Class B Licenses Eleven (11) Class C Licenses One (1) Class D License Two (2) Class E Licenses One (1) Class G License One (1) Class H License One (1) Class M License Two (2) Class P Licenses Sixteen (16) Class R Licenses Ten (10) Class S Licenses One (1) Class T License Nine (9) Class W Licenses SECTION TVQ; That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of ATTEST: Village President Wage �Clerk R 1990. om Establishment Number A McBride's; Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me 3 B Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn 2 C Alvee's Liquors; Bolzano liquors; Dominick's (83 & Golf); Gold Eagle liquors; The Liquor Shoppe; Mt. Prospect Liquors: Osco Drugs; Phar -Mor; United Liquor Mart; Walgreens (83 and Golf); Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza) 11 D Prospect Moose Lodge 1 E Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's Banquet Hall 2 G Mount Prospect Park District -Golf Course 1 H Zanie's 1 M Holiday Inn 1 P Arlington Club Beverage; Sbimada Shoten 2 R Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Dragon City; Edwardo's; Fellini; Giordano's (Rand Road); Giordano's- (Elmhurst R"; House of Szechwan; Izakaya Sankyu; little America; Pepe's; Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise; Torishin; Yasuke 16 S Carlisle; El Sombrero; Evans; Jake's Pizza; Kampai; Old Orchard -Greenview; Reunion; Sam's Place; Second Dynasty; Wild Stallions Cafe 10 T Thunderbird Lanes 1 W Mickey's Diner; Mr. Beef & Pizza; Pete's Sandwich Palace; Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut (Algonquin Rd); Pizza Hut (Euclid); Rosati's Pizza; Taqueria Fiesta; Wag's 9- 60 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER . P FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39-V-90, HUNTINGTON LTD. PARTNERSHIP LOCATION: 1200-1380 S. ELMHURST ROAD (HUNTINGTON SQUARE APTS.) DATE: JUNE 28, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendations on an application for an amendment to the existing Planned Unit Development for Huntington Square Apartments. The application was filed to amend the PUD to permit a parking variation to allow the construction of garages. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 14, 1990. At the meeting, Property Manager Dennis Hughes presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that the ownership of the property would like to construct 86 garage spaces for residents. He stated that there have been many improvements recently completed at the complex, and the garages are just the next step to upgrade the property. Mr. Hughes noted that many residents had inquired about garage spaces, for shelter and security of their vehicles. Mr. Hughes stated that occupancy rates are high at the property, yet parking counts revealed over 100 vacant spaces on 7 different occasions. Mr. Hughes stated that there are approximately 500 parking spaces on-site, and there is sufficient parking for residents of the complex. Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that staff counts confirmed 500 existing spaces with over 100 vacant spaces. Mr. Clements further stated that construction of the 86 garages results in a net loss of 13 spaces at the complex. Mr. Clements stated that the application should be measured against the 13 spaces that are lost due to the garage construction. With over 100 vacant spaces as an indication of demand, the loss of 13 spaces would not contribute to a parking problem at Huntington Square. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning Board believes that this would be a good upgrade at the property, providing an important amenity for residents. Members of the Zoning Board determined that there would be sufficient parking on-site as a result of the garages. With over 100 vacant spaces confirmed on a number of dates, the loss of 13 spaces due to the garage construction would not cause a parking shortage. John Fulton Dixon - Page 2 June 28, 1990 Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the existing PUD at Huntington Square Apartments be amended to allow the construction of 86 garages, resulting in a revised parking count of 487 spaces for the 324 apartments, or 1 1/2 spaces per unit. The motion is subject to the garages being constructed of face brick on all four sides, and submittal of a landscape plan. Lastly, it should be noted that a variation of the perimeter setback requirement to allow a 9 1/2 foot setback was withdrawn, as the garages will be built on a conforming 10 foot setback. DMC:hg UI!A NtiNO °0N C 0 IA M 0 0 A 0 N \4 HUMMOM 4sp R in inks., 0, fi re a NEW GARWGUALTERED EeKfi-Q TYPICAL MODULE GUM Fj 0 h3 tj c�4 4-r44 5TATW C��Ox)l -(VING ---324 :ARKING ;EGUIPED: 739 PROPOSED AS ALTERED FOR PROPOSED GARAGES -504 PRQEj�EQ GAAW,,� HUNTING ON SOVARE, APARTMENTS M PR2§LFCt, ILL. 10/13/04 JAMES MILTON PAY R ASSOC-ARCH, REV. 11/27/89 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 38 -SU -90, 39-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETITIONER: Huntington Ltd. Partnership SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1200-1380 S. Elmhurst Road PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 1990 REQUEST: A Special Use amending the Planned Unit Development to allow construction of garages. Also requested are variations from Section 14.2503.6 to allow a 9 1/2 ft. side yard and Section 14.2503.8 to allow 504 parking spaces. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Seven Person in Audience Chairman Basnik introduced this case as a request by Huntington Ltd. Partnership, 1200- 1380 South Elmhurst Road to allow an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development to permit a parking variation to allow the construction of garages. Mr. Dennis Hughes introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated he is the property manager representing the ownership of the apartments. Mr. Hughes stated that ownership in the past several years had spent a substantial amount of money making improvements to Huntington Apartments, and that the proposed garages are just another proposed amenity and improvement for the convenience of the residents. Mr. Hughes stated that many residents had asked about the possibility of garages and that the ownership is now in a position ' pd*Hugheses,7that r eC en 'y Huntington ::nin g n S gquare bad provided a new swi ng ceve porn0ns0ftiivayaisles, refurbished all laundry facilities 'tted t0ntinue,uprdg the complex. Mr. Hughes s d�at�aragcons�aonWould require a parking variation and that he had cond id an pa .gsury7yofvacantspcesatthe complex ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39.V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 Mr. Hughes submitted a handout to the Zoning Board that depicted seven parking counts during the month of May and each parking count indicated an excess of over 100 vacant parking spaces. Mr. Hughes then noted that the complex is 97% occupied and that the vacant spaces are not attributable to a high vacancy rate in the apartments. He stated that the garages would be brick construction on all four sides and that the garages would be constructed in two phases. Mr. Dave Clements then summarized the staff report for the benefit of the audience and the Zoning Board and Mr. Clements noted that the parking variation would be necessary to allow the garage construction. He pointed out that building the garages requires more land area than surface spaces, and that the actual net loss of surface parking spaces due to the construction of the garages, was 13 spaces. Mr. Clements stated that this is the figure that needs to be considered when evaluating the request and that the actual demand on parking has to be measured to see if 13 spaces would create a parking problem Mr. Clements indicated that the Planning and Zoning staff had also conducted parking space counts at Huntington Square Apartments and the staffs survey confirmed the numbers presented by Mr. Hughes indicated a parking space vacancy in excess of 100. Considering this number of vacant spaces, Mr. Clements indicated that the 13 space loss, as a result of the garage construction, would not create a parking problem for the tenants of the apartment complex. Mr. Clements also pointed out that 84 of the garage spaces are proposed to be located along the south line of the property adjoining the Commonwealth Edison easement and that this location of the structures would place the garages out of sight lines of other condominium projects in Huntington Commons, therefore having no adverse impact on adjoining properties. Chairman Basnik asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Norman Johnson, a resident of a condominium development adjoining the apartment complex, stated he had no objections to the ownership continuing to provide improvements to the apartment complex but he bad concerns about the garages being constructed near the bike path on the Commonwealth Edison easement, and the fact that the rear of the garages could be subject to graffiti and an area where litter could accumulate. Mr. Hughes responded and stated that ownership has five full-time maintenance men at the apartment complex and the rear of the garages would be maintained and any graffiti would be removed immediately. Mr. Hughes noted that this apartment complex is an up -scale rental community charging higher rents than surrounding developments, and as such, maintenance is a high priority. Mr. Mark Parrenti introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated he is a resident at the apartment complex and a maintenance employee. He stated that graffiti is not a maintenance problem,at Huntington Square. Mr. Joseph Filcar stated that he also is a resident of the apartment complex and that he supports the application because he would appreciate having a garage for his vehicle and that this would add security to his automobile, lower his insurance, and provide a much needed enclosed parking for residents in this area. He stated that the garages would be small and have no adverse impact on visibility from the apartments. ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 3 Mr. Ben Gittler introduced himself as a resident of the apartments, and stated he has no objection and that the ownership provides excellent maintenance and care for the property. Mr. Basnik indicated that, from his review, the application merely is providing the garages as an amenity to residents and this is another improvement to the property. Mr. Lannon pointed out that the statements on graffiti are important, but he did not believe that the threat of graffiti should be a major consideration in reviewing the amendment to the PUD. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that the garages would be a positive addition to the apartment complex, and the Zoning Board had no objections. Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Ms. Skowron moved that the Zoning Board approve an amendment to the Huntington Square Planned Unit Development to allow a parking variation to permit the construction of garages. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by vote of 6-0. The motion was made subject to a suitable landscaping plan for the garages being submitted to the staff. Respectfully Submitted, DAVID M. CLEMENTS IT-ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPt�� nANNNG AM ZONING DEPARTWNT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M., CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39.V-90, HUNTINGTON LTD. PARTNERSHIP LOCATION: 1200-1380 S. ELMHURST ROAD (HUNTINGTON SQUARE APTS.) DATE: JUNE 8, 19" This application was filed for an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development in order to construct garages at the Huntington Square Apartments. 1. A parking variation to allow 504 spaces or 1.55 spaces per unit, rather than the required 2 spaces per unit. 2. A variation of the 10 foot required perimeter setback to allow a 9 1/2 foot setback VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS The Fire Department commented that a clearance of 48" must be maintained from all fire hydrants. This may slightly reduce the final number of garages. Public Works notes that no part of the structures shall encroach on any existing easements. Inspection Services points out that detailed construction drawings will be necessary, including further information on curb and sidewalk replacement and grading plans. The Engineering Division is concerned that several of the garage structures may be placed over service connections for water and storm sewer. These are private utility connections to public mains and lines. The applicant should be aware that certain service connections should be rerouted to avoid such conflicts. EL&hMHG AND ZODMiG COMMENTS First, it should be noted that the variation of the 10 foot perimeter setback to 9 1/2 feet does not need to be reviewed. All garages are proposed to be built on a 10 foot setback, off of any public utility easements. Zoning Board of AppeaL, Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 2 Concerning the parking variation, staff notes that the parking legend on the site plan is not accurate. Actual numbers are as follows: -Number of living units: 324 -Total spaces required: 672 -Ten percent increase for PUD: 67 -Total parking requirement: 739 - Existing parking from 2 actual counts: 500 - Number of existing parking places lost due to garage construction: 99 - Number if garages proposed: 86 - Net loss due to garage construction: 13 - Revised parking count including garages: 487 Existing parking at Huntington Square is less than our current Ordinance requirement. Also, the original development plan for the project provided for 384 units and 384 parking spaces. Regardless of these various parking counts, the important thing to consider with this request is the actual parking demand at this apartment complex. The proposed garages eliminate 13 parking spaces, due to the size of the structures and the fact that they require more land area than a surface parking space.., The petitioner has been asked to conduct a survey of vacant spaces in order to justify the request. Also, the staff is doing parking counts on several days. This information Will be available at the public hearing. From all indications, the number of vacant spaces far exceeds the 13 spaces that are lost with the garage construction. This would point to demand for parking at less. than the revised parking count of 487 spaces. The purpose of the garages is to improve the marketability of this rental community. Covered parking is an amenity that many people look for, and the garages could be a real asset for residents. The garages will be finished with face brick on all four sides. Sample photographs are enclosed. One resident noted that the Park District bike path is very near the garages. This resident indicated a concern about graffiti, and litter control on the back of the garages. The petitioner should address these concerns. DMC:hg „ALIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPx.,,,T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN Mb FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT- ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39-V.90, HUNTINGTON LTD. PARTNERSHIP LOCATION. 1200-1380 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD DATE: MAY 18, 19” This request involves an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development, to allow garages to be constructed at Huntington Square Apartments. Upon review of this application, several Village Departments indicated a concern about existing utility lines, and if the proposed garages might be located over public and private utilities. In order to allow more time to look into these questions, staff asks the Zoning Board to continue the request to the Special Meeting of June 14. DMC:hg CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2414 PROVIDING FOR AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS HUNTINGTON SQUARE APARTMENTS LOCATED WITHIN HUNTINgTON COMMONS WHEREAS, Huntington Limited Partnership (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property commonly known as Huntington Square Apartments and located at 1200 - 1380 South Elmhurst Road (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property); and WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows: That part of Lot 1 in Kenroy's Huntington, being a Subdivision of part of the EAst 1/2 of Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Lot 1; thence south 88 degrees 59 minutes 01 seconds west, 673.17 feet along the south line of south Lot (being also the north line of the Commonwealth Edison Company right-of-way); thence south 79 degrees 30 minutes 45 seconds west, 215.00 feet along the southeasterly line of said lot; thence north 10 degrees 29 minutes 15 seconds west, 340.087 feet, perpendicularly to said southeasterly line; thence northeasterly 121.285 feet along the arc of a circle of 247.00 feet radius, convex to the southeast and whose chord bears north 24 degrees 32 minutes 55 seconds east; thence south 83 degrees 56 minutes 26 seconds east, 180.00 feet; thence south 48 degrees 42 minutes 1.6 seconds east 50.627 feet to a point of a line 352.00 feet (measured perpendicularly) north of and parallel with the south line of said lot; thence north 86 degrees 59 minutes 01 seconds east 251.328 feet along said parallel line; thence north 79 degrees 37 minutes 13 seconds east, 105.22 feet to a point 325.00 feed (measured perpendicularly) west of the east line of said lot; thence north 10 degrees 22 minutes 47 seconds west, 192.872 feet; thence north 9 degrees 45 minutes 52 seconds east, 117.236 feet; thence north 4 degrees 48 minutes 29 seconds west 158.00 feet; thence north 85 degrees 11 minutes 31 seconds east, 335.119 feet to a point of tangency; thence easterly 20.672 feet along the arc of a circle of 33.00 feet radius, convex to the north east and whose chord bears south 76 degrees 51 minutes 45.5 seconds east, to a point on the aforementioned east line of said lot; thence south 0 degrees 04 minutes 30 seconds west 849.591 feet along said east line to the place of beginning, in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use (designated as ZBA Case No. 38 -SU -89) before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 14th day of June, 1990, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 8th day of May, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on the proposed Special Use to amend the Planned Unit Development to the President and Board of Trustees; and WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the ZBA 38 -SU -90 Page 2 of 2 Village of Mount Prospect will be served by the granting the request being the subject of ZBA 38 -SU -90. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: That that portion of Exhibit y_, being the Site Plan, attached to Ordinance No. 2414, passed and approved April 19, 1973, identified as "All on Exbibit '*4r and pertaining to the apartment complex immediately west of Elmhurst Road and south of Huntington Commons Road be and the same is hereby amended by substituting a new Exhibit for that apartment complex idetified herein, which substituted Exhibit is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "X". The amendment being the subject of this Ordinance permits the construction of 86 garages for the benefit of the residents of Huntington Square Apartments, which garages shall be constructed using face brick on all four sides of the structures. A landscape plan shall be submitted for approval by the Planning and Zoning Department. SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk , Tw'P . �... .. i Sq:DWa *OUL-1 1dOH 9TOZ It' PnA IUO.1J 10 ta 0160t, 01 01KC tuoij aft"'OA03 101 2sualoui 01 put, 'oAu xelwn:) le ,Io motmarldoi moue of suopri nuotpne pnog p JVA . 0218MA QqI IRtli spuatawwai sleoddV jo pivog SumoZ oill `a)OA 0-9 9 A4 'XigulP100av -pOOq1oq0jau sp . p u! swolqojd jjo-uni ipjVmumis asnw) jou p1nom uoijin . .mA jourEa ST ql PUR 'AUMOAUP JVjM.ItD Oqj of PQWjaJ STM U0111OLMA 92LIJOA00 101 oqi ivqi paiou piroa 2uTaOZ xU -isanb.)j aqvRU!Uoddns !dOH t,10Z IV joumo kjadoid oqj tuo.4 ional e of aamajoi aprm puv 1pooqjoqq&m aqi uo Induii osioApt ut, p -eq jou sviq ArmoAup npiaip guilsixo Oql 1eqj SOAa' pq p.mog guyuoZ otLL -poAoidde oq uolimilddic oqi Ieql spuourmwol pivog SuiuoZ oq.L -puo-a joAr 3 .doiaUpjljosouinjOA.iolqSl42uL�In 1001IS joiaolloo pooqloqqSiaue si ourl !dOH su gmsu',"u )4OPS R st, [LI -89903M S, OAup nimip ST.q pus 'pooqjoqqgiou ;)ql ty! SoAup xelmm joqio am, alatli jap polou oil. ON 'JW 'XVMOATlp mau oqi taollv of uoijvLmA oqi spoou pus 'sioAvd 3pjjq qjjm krtAoAijp llvlqdsT oqi aorldol of s;)doq OH '096T ui ipnq sem osnoq aqj uoqtA pollinsu! sum AumoAppm1rom lvtr!2jjo oqj regi pgims itmilddt! otLL -isonboi oql Io ijoddns ui Auouipsal p2jumid onoN -IN Isupoom 0111 IV '0661 `ti aunt jo Supam maip it, jsonboj aql paiop1sum) pxeoEl SuTao z OU 'Oloot 01 ologc icao-ii pjrA iuoij pojinboi r ui agionAw jol uinwpmTz atp osmajoui of put, 'paxuldoi oq of AvmoAupmrwip Bun . spra ur moue 01 Jopio UT poll g Sv/A UOjIRDT ddr atLL 'ourl jdoj4 91OZ jo onoN plBuo(I Aq pO'lg UOIJV�MA V JOJ UOT aT , uv R .110 IddL uo uOplopuourmoaoi iptli 'uopinop1suoa inoAioj sIlEasumn slVaddV jo pxeog SU!UoZ otU 0661 'LZ aNaf :a1vu aNlY1 MOH 9102 WOLLV3011 OLLON Id GIVNO(I '06 -A -It -VU :K)afffas ONINOZ aNV DNWN�+ Id AO HOJOaRIG'simimimaw auva UONA H3'DVNVU 3DY1'11A'N0XM 'A NHOf :01 siouillj ljoadmld junoW INAKLNVdga DNIMOZ aNV 9XIMAMd 1:)adsoxd INflow do aorriu, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT .PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 41-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETITIONER: Donald R. Notto SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2016 Hopi Lane PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 1990 REQUEST. The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.3016.A.1 so that a circular driveway may be replaced. A second variation from the 35% maximum of Section 14.1102.A is requested so that 40% of the front yard may be covered with impervious surface. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being an application for a variation to allow the replacement of an existing circular driveway, and a variation of the impervious lot surface coverage in the front yard of the home at 2016 Hopi Lane. Mr. and Mrs. Donald Notto introduced themselves to the Zoning Board. They indicated that they were the original owners of this home and that the circular drive had originally been installed in 1960. Mr. Notto indicated that the driveway was originally installed as a safety measure because Hopi Lane connects to River Road, and there is a high volume of traffic in front of the home. He stated that the driveway is deteriorated and in need of replacement and that he would like to construct the new circular driveway out of brick pavers, and provide a more attractive front yard at his residence. To support the request, Mr. Notto stated that there are 6 circular driveways in the 1800 block of Hopi Lane and that he had talked with the Police Department, and this conversation had revealed that there were no accidents along this street in the past 8 years. ZBA-41-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report and stated that, as a general rule, the staff and the Zoning Board look more favorably on circular drives on busy arterial streets. Mr. Clements noted that Hopi Lane is a neighborhood collector and that perhaps there were not the traffic volumes on this street to justify circular drives, as has been done with past requests. However, Mr. Clements noted that this circular drive had been in place since the home was originally built in 1960, and that there did not seem to be any adverse impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Clements also made reference to the lot coverage variation and stated that this is a proposed increase of 5% from the 35% maximum. Mr. Clements pointed out that the petitioner could meet the lot coverage standard in the required front yard, if the circular drive were eliminated and a standard two -car driveway provided to the home. Mr. Clements suggested that the petitioner at least address this as an alternative. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. Chairman Basnik asked how wide the proposed driveway was, and Mr. Clements indicated that the driveway was 13 feet wide. Mr. Basnik then read a letter into the record from Mr. George Stout, a neighbor and adjoining property owner, indicating no objection to the request. Mr. Cassidy stated that the lot coverage variation was relatively minor and that flooding is not a problem in this neighborhood. He also indicated that the brick driveway would be attractive. Mr. Brettrager pointed out that the lot is very wide and there is sufficient land area to accommodate the driveway. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Cassidy moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a circular driveway and a lot coverage variation in the required front yard to the Village Board for 2016 Hopi Lane. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, DAVID M. CLEMENTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSkx.,-CT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Iftois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W _ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA41-V.", DONALD R. NOTTO LOCATION: 2016 HOPI LANE DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 The applicant requests a variation from Section 143016A1 so that a circular driveway may be replaced. A second variation from the 35% maximum of Section 14.1102A is requested so that 40% of the front yard may be covered with impervious surface. VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS Engineering notes that the west portion of the driveway is close to an intersection. If a car is parked in the driveway, it might present a sight line problem. The property is not in the flood plain. Inspection Services comments that brick will be used for driveway approaches and the homeowner shall be notified that he is responsible for repair/removal/replacement of the brick if work is ever needed in the parkway, PLAbfflNG AND ZONING COMMENTS The applicant would like to replace an existing circular driveway at 2016 Hopi Lane. The asphalt driveway would be replaced with paver bricks. Because this is a complete driveway replacement, variations of all current requirements must be obtained. Staff notes that the circular driveway was installed when the house was built in 1968. At that time, a variation was not necessary for a circular driveway. From all indications, the existing circular drive has not had any negative impact. However, in the past, circular driveways have only been permitted on busy arterial streets, as a safety measure. There are no other circular driveways in this neighborhood. Concerning the lot coverage variation in the required front yard, this cannot really be reduced unless the circular driveway is eliminated. It is doubtful that this paving in the front yard has caused any flooding problems in this area. It seems that a normal two -car driveway would adequately serve the petitioner, and eliminate the need for the lot coverage variation. The petitioner should address the necessity of the circular drive, and why a normal two -car driveway would not be sufficient. DMC:hg VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE& PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER Mu,. - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA41-V-90, DONALD R. NOTTO LOCATION: 2016 HOPI LANE DATE: JUNE 27, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for a variation filed by Donald Notto of 2016 Hopi Lane. The application was filed in order to allow an existing circular driveway to be replaced, and to increase the maximum lot coverage in a required front yard from 35% to 40%. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 14, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Notto presented testimony in support of the request. The applicant stated that the original circular driveway was installed when the house was built in 1960. He hopes to replace the asphalt driveway with brick pavers, and needs the variation to allow the new driveway. Mr. Notto noted that there are other circular drives in the neighborhood, and his circular drive is necessary as a safety measure as Hopi Lane is a neighborhood collector street carrying higher volumes of traffic to River Road. The Zoning Board recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning Board believes that the existing circular driveway has not had an adverse impact on the neighborhood, and made reference to a letter from the property owner at 2014 Hopi supporting the request. The Zoning Board noted that the lot coverage variation was related to the circular driveway, and this minor variation would not cause stormwater run-off problems in this neighborhood. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote. the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board authorize variations to allow replacement of a circular drive, and to increase lot coverage from 35% to 40% in a front yard at 2016 Hopi Lane. DMC:hg UNIT NU 4 DZ.Lv" OF COOK I 6- Ll 00 Y ,\ \g4ljAlVj Br' -level Residence under co, 't 04 oled July 14b• 1968 #68-7-8314 c1ra-ra ^V "WINAl. MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 41-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PE'T'ITIONER: Donald R. Notto SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2016 Hopi Lane PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 1990 REQUEST. The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.3016A I so that a circular driveway may be replaced. A second variation from the 35% maximum of Section 14.1102.A is requested so that 40% of the front yard may be covered with impervious surface. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being an application for a variation to allow the replacement of an existing circular driveway, and a variation of the impervious lot surface coverage in the front yard of the home at 2016 Hopi Lane. Mr. and Mrs. Donald Notto introduced themselves to the Zoning Board. They indicated that they were the original owners of this home and that the circular drive had originally been installed in 1960. Mr. Notto indicated that the driveway was originally installed as a safety measure because Hopi Lane connects to River Road, and there is a high volume of traffic in front of the home. He stated that the driveway is deteriorated and in need of replacement and that he would like to construct the new circular driveway out of brick pavers, and provide a more attractive front yard at his residence. To support the request, Mr. Notto stated that there are 6 circular driveways in the 1800 block of Hopi Lane and that he had talked with the Police Department, and this conversation had revealed that there were no accidents along this street in the past 8 years. ZBA41-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report and stated that, as a general rule, the staff and the Zoning Board look more favorably on circular drives on busy arterial streets. Mr. Clements noted that Hopi Lane is a neighborhood collector and that perhaps there were not the traffic volumes on this street to justify circular drives, as has been done with past requests. However, Mr. Clements noted that this circular drive had been in place since the home was originally built in 1960, and that there did not seem to be any adverse impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Clements also made reference to the lot coverage variation and stated that this is a proposed increase of 5% from the 35% maximum. Mr. Clements pointed out that the petitioner could meet the lot coverage standard in the required front yard, if the circular drive were eliminated and a standard two -car driveway provided to the home. Mr. Clements suggested that the petitioner at least address this as an alternative. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. Chairman Basnik asked how wide the proposed driveway was, and Mr. Clements indicated that the driveway was 13 feet wide. Mr. Basnik then read a letter into the record from Mr. George Stout, a neighbor and adjoining property owner, indicating no objection to the request. Mr. Cassidy stated that the lot coverage variation was relatively minor and that flooding is not a problem in this neighborhood. He also indicated that the brick driveway would be attractive. Mr. Brearager pointed out that the lot is very wide and there is sufficient land area to accommodate the driveway. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Cassidy moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a circular driveway and a lot coverage variation in the required front yard to the Village Board for 2016 Hopi Lane. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, DAVID M. CLEMENTS &LAGE OF MOULT" PROSPb,;-,T Pt,. MQNG AND ZONWG DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Minois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNII , CHAIRMAN PM - FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA41.VAO, DONALD R NOTTO LOCATION: 2016 HOPI LANE DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 EEf2.F�+" The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.301&4_1 so that a circular driveway may be replaced. A second variation from the 35% maximum of Section 14.1102.A is requested so that 40% of the front yard may be covered with impervious surface. Engineering notes that the west portion of the driveway is close to an intersection. If a car is parked in the driveway, it might present a sight line problem. The property is not in the flood plain. Inspection Services comments that brick will be used for driveway approaches and the homeowner shall be notified that he is responsible for repair/removal/replacement of the brick if work is ever needed in the parkway. PL r MNG A" ZONING C MMEM The applicant would like to replace an existing circular driveway at 2016 Hopi imine. The asphalt driveway would be replaced with paver bricks. Because this is a complete driveway replacement, variations of all current requirements must be obtained. Staff notes that the circular driveway was installed when the house was built in 1968. At that time, a variation was not necessary for a circular driveway. From all indications, the existing circular drive has not had any negative impact. However, in the past, circular driveways have only been permitted on busy arterial streets, as a safety measure. There are no other circular driveways in this neighborhood. Concerning the lot coverage variation in the required front yard, this cannot "really be reduced unless the circular driveway is eliminated. It is doubtful that this paving in the front yard has caused any flooding problems in this area. It seems that a normal two -car driveway would adequately serve the petitioner, and eliminate the need for the lot coverage variation. The petitioner should address the necessity of the circular drive, and why a normal two -car driveway would not be sufficient. DMC:hg CAF/ 07/10/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2016 HOPI LANE WHEREAS, Iris Ann Malato (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for a variation from Chapter 14 of the Village code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 2016 Hopi Lane (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 1 in Resubdivision of Lots 98 and 99 in the Resubdivision of Lots 1 to 129, inclusive (except Lot 87), in Forest Manor Unit No. 4, being a subdivision in the Southwest Quarter (1/4) and the Southeast Quarter (1/4) of Section 25, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, according to Plat of said Resubdivision registered in the office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois, on May 9, 1968 as Document Number 2386913 and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a variation from Section 14.3016.A.1 to permit a circular driveway resulting in an lot coverage of 40% in a required front yard; and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 41-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 14th day of June, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 29th day of May, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 41-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.3016.A.1 to permit a circular driveway resulting in a lot coverage of 40% in a required front yard, as indicated on the site plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other applicable village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein ZBA 41-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. �Fields Village Clerk 'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGERfi1v� I FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA42-V-90, IRENE B. SALA LOCATION: 107 WEST ORCHARD PLACE DATE: JUNE 27, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for a variation filed by Irene Sala. The application was filed to allow a 16 1/2 foot wide one -car driveway rather than 15 foot; and a reduction of the 6 1/2 foot sideyard requirement to allow the driveway 1 1/2 feet from the lot line. The Zoning Board of appeals considered the request at their meeting of June 14, 1990. At the meeting, Ms. Sala stated that she would like to replace an existing driveway in the same location, and that variations are necessary to allow the driveway replacement. The Zoning Board recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning Board noted that the house immediately west has an identical driveway and reduced setback, so the proposed variations would have no adverse impact on this property. Members of the Zoning Board believed that these were minor variations, only necessary to allow the existing driveway to be replaced. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that the application be approved DMC:hg ^ — �SITE 14 04 ci AWIlra so ` MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 42-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETITIONER: Irene B. Sala SUBJECT PROPERTY: 107 West Orchard Place PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 1990 REQUEST: The following is requested: Variations from Section 14.3016A3 so that a 16.5 foot wide driveway may be replacedand Section 14.1102.13 so that a 1.5 foot setback may be maintained for the driveway instead of 6.5 feet. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT. Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being a variation to permit a 16 1/2 foot wide driveway which would reduce the 61/2 foot required side yard to 11/2 feet at 107 Orchard Place. The petitioner, Irene Sala, introduced herself to the Zoning Board and stated that the existing asphalt driveway is deteriorated and in need of repair. She stated that she had filed a variation only to allow the existing driveway to be replaced by a new drive in exactly the same location. Mr. Clements summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and confirmed that the existing driveway is deteriorated. Mr. Clements further noted that the property immediately west of this residence has an identical driveway with a one -car garage and parking apron in a side yard. Based on this, Mr. Clements stated that he did believe that the applicant's request would have any adverse impact on the neighbor's property. ZBA-42-V 90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was noted that the existing driveway had not seemed to cause any negative impact on the neighborhood, therefore, the new structure would be appropriate. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a 16 1/2 foot driveway with a 1 1/2 foot side yard setback at 107 West Orchard Place. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call; AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, DAVID M. CLEMENTS ViLI AGE OF MOUNT PROSPL%,T PLANMING AtM ZOMING DEPARTMENr Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W, FROM: DAVID NL CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT- ZBA42.V.9Q IRENE B. SALA LOCATION: 107 WEST ORCHARD PLACE DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 The applicant requests a variation from Section 143016A.3 so that a 16.5 foot wide driveway may be replaced. A 15 foot driveway is permitted for a one -car garage. Also, a variation from Section 14.1102.11 is requested so that a 1.5 foot setback may be maintained for the driveway instead of 6.5 feet VILLAGE ETAU COMMENTS Engineering is concerned that the new driveway must not alter the existing drainage pattern on public right-of-way or private property. Inspection Services states that no fffl shall be placed along the side yard. PIAWN& AND ZONING 02MMENTS Mrs. Sala would like to replace the existing driveway at her residence. The driveway is 16- 1/2 feet wide, and serves a one car garage. Because the applicant is constructing a new driveway, variations of current requirements are necessary. Staff notes that the existing driveway is deteriorated, and in need of repair. The driveway will be 1-1/2 feet from the side lot line, thus a variation of the required sideyard is necessary. It is important to note that the house immediately to the west has an identical driveway arrangement for a one -car garage. This would indicate that replacing the driveway is in character with the area, and would have no adverse effect on the neighbor's home. Based on these observations, the staff recommends approval of the request. DMC:hg CAF/ 07/10/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 107 WEST ORCHARD PLACE WHEREAS, Irene B. Sala (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as 107 West Orchard Place (hereinafter. referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: Lot 30 in First Addition to Country Club Terrace, being a subdivision of part of Lot 18 in Owner's subdivision of Section 13, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Section 14.3016.A.3 to permit a driveway sixteen feet 6 inches (161 611) and a variation from Section 14.1102.B to permit a side yard setback of one foot six inches (11 611); and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 42-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 14th day of June, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 29th day of May, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village have given further consideration to the variations being the subject of ZBA 42-V-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said variations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation from Section 14.3016.A.3 to permit a driveway width of sixteen feet six inches (161 611) and a variation from Section 14.1102.E to permit a side yard setback of one foot six inches (11 611), to allow the replacement of a driveway. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the village code, the variations granted herein 1A ZBA 42-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this Ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk -,t ILLAGE►MOXJN'T �MErrr XM PIG AND ZO t, flllnois Mount PMsP 300 V. Dl"C'ro'g Of pAVTD A C�LEN� A1 -B C3NW C'R�CfET S13BJECT.. 2(f3 NURTa BUSS L STOE T 28, 1990 enctatt� , On pOV. their recomm nsiderata o 203 hiorth Busse be rear mits for your d 169 froeleet from Board of Appel filed by o be unrtalso e a venation of the Vitae zoning v allow a detache & ra e apphca an applacat has filed lot line. verag pt the e applacationnd 1,63 feet fr dhto sallow 4150/0 lot co of June 14,1990 -ted that eix meeting Ne indica 1°t line, and ,overage Stan request uest, new 45010 the �, at of the reel , construct this d coosadered re ony in support he would to arage ooing Boar d resented testun roperty, and ennit the new gny ga ages The NU f.,roenwal p e is on are ssa leo food, there are 1l not alter the s frame gag nese meeting, tion. arlatiousthis older nei sed garage garage would an old deteriorate loca the prop° t the Proposedalth Edison lam aid stated that, ants, soone sage at the uI .. also noted from Coma► garage Mr C,roenw setback req ted that he as locate eet,rrent "The petitioner ed a ale indica any, that do not gl' orhoeo he has o tame easernent with the utility comp character e o 5 foot easemncroach 2 feefeet� after drsc,rssions of the 'Zoning encroach to the garage to than 1,6g Members e sem to penny e setback rather roved. cted in the . a lication be appe to be constru the adjo•ng requestin% his d also niu g Board recommends that allow thea adverse imp e Uig Boar is a na borhood. °Tr► this The d noted that it was regarage, as there a rr the neigh ed with this request as Board tan other sundOXg. really incr location the tthere oche va atron IS not licatior propel, the to erag mends tbat the app noted that e. Hing Board of Appel recd replacement a ec vote, rear ack of 3 feet, Accordarngi'd� $rlbyect a be app DMC. -hg i Q q,rtge 14, 0 C 2 02 i ee. 94f�je �c q10 h rze �r c.iaa rrgoc..,,y "�Mr+N w MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 43-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETMONER: Thomas Groenwald SUBJECT PROPERTY: 203 North Russel Street PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 1990 REQUEST., A variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a side yard of 1.63 feet and a rear yard of 1.68 feet for a garage. Also requested is a variation from Section 14.1102.11 to allow 47.5% impervious lot surface coverage. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being variations to allow a new garage to be constructed at a 1.63 foot side yard, and 1.68 foot rear yard and to allow a 47.5% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code. Mr. Groenwald introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that he has an existing frame garage that is over 50 years old and is deteriorating and in need of repair. He would like to remove the existing garage and place a new structure in exactly the same location. This location would place the new structure 1.68 feet from the rear lot fine and 1.63 feet from the side lot line. Mr. Groenwald noted that this would be a variation of the 5 foot required setback. He indicated that he had done a survey of the immediate neighborhood and found that there were a significant number of garages built at less than the 5 foot setback. His survey indicated that there are approximately 30 detached garages in the area with non -conforming setbacks. He stated that there is no flooding in this neighborhood and so the reduced setback would not contribute to any flooding on the neighbor's property. He also indicated that he had contacted his neighbors and they had no objection to the request. Concerning the rear setback, Mr. Groenwald noted that there is a 5 foot utility easement provided for the overhead utilities. He stated he had contacted Commonwealth Edison and they had indicated that they would have no objection to the garage being constructed and maintain a 3 foot setback, which would be a 2 foot encroachment on the easement. Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report and indicated that the older frame garage on this property was deteriorating and in need of repair. Mr. Clements confirmed the �-,A-43-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 statements by Mr. Groenwald that there are many detached garages in this neighborhood at less than the 5 foot required side yard. However; Mr. Clements indicated a concern with allowing the garage to be constructed on the rear easement. Even if Commonwealth Edison had issued a waiver to permit the garage to be built at a 3 foot setback, there would still be some exposure for the property owner and that if Commonwealth Edison ever had to maintain the overhead lines, with damage to the garage, the utility company would not be liable, and the property owner would have to make those repairs. Considering that, Mr. Clements recommended that the garage be maintained at a 5 foot setback. He noted that this .minor modification would not reduce much of the usable area of the petitioner's rear yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussedthe request and it was noted that, if the utility company had no objections to the encroachment, then the Village should not object too strenuously, inasmuch as this would be a matter between the utility company and the property owner. Ms. Skowron indicated site was concerned about the garage encroaching on an easement and felt like this was not a good practice to be involved with. She was concerned about the overhead wires and the possibility that the wires could break due to an ice storm or heavy winds and come in contact with the garage. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was believed that the 3 foot setback for the rear yard would be a good compromise in this application. "There was also no objection to the reduced side yard or the lot coverage. The Zoning Board noted that the higher lot coverage is primarily due to the narrow lot size on this property. The lot is only 54 feet wide. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve setback variations for the garage subject to a 3 .foot rear yard being maintained. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Basnik NAYS: Skowron The • o'ved by a vote:of Ms. Skowron voted against the motion indicating that she believed the new garage should be located off of the easement. Chairman Basnik then asked for a motion on the lot coverage variation. Mr. Lannon moved that the variation be approved. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, 11, /�, � DAVID M. CLEMENTS tLIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPt&'T PLANNING An ZOMING DEPAMUNT Mount Prospect, Minols TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W_ FROM: DAVID M. CIZMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT- ZBA43-V.90, THOMAS GROENWALD LOCATION- 203. NORTH RUSSEL STREET DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.102.11.2 to allow a side yard of 1.63 feet and a rear yard of 1.68 feet for a garage. The applicant is also requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow 47.5% impervious lot surface coverage. V ILLAQE STAFF COMMENTS Engineering feels that the new garage should not be placed on an existing easement. According to Engineering, there are no Village utilities in the easement. Inspection Services specifies that no fill shall be placed in the side or rear yards. Inspection Services notes that the subdivision plat indicates an easement along the rear property line and all utility companies should issue waivers before the new garage is built Also, if a portion of the driveway is gravel, then it should be surfaced. PLANNING AND ZONI NMNTS The petitioner would like to remove an old frame garage and slab , and construct a new two -car garage at the same location. The existing gravel drive Will be paved. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 5 foot rear and 5 foot sideyard for an accessory building. The new garage is proposed to be built at 1.68' from the rear lot line and 1.63' from the side lot line. Staff is concerned about the new garage being constructed on an existing 5' rear easement. There are overhead utility lines along the rear lot line, and the easement is necessary for access and maintenance. In reference to the sideyard, staff would prefer to see the sideyard increased to at least 2 1/2, to 31, to provide more open space around the structure, and more area for drainage. There are other garages in this neighborhood built at reduced setbacks. Concerning the lot coverage variation, this is a minor percentage variation, and is attributable to the smaller lot size at this location. Staff has no objection to the lot coverage variation, as the new garage will not increase run-off. The changes in the location of the proposed garage are minor, and should not reduce the usable rear yard at the petitioner's home. Staff recommends that the garage be relocated off of the easement, and at a 2 1/2' to 3' sideyard setback. I SUOT4PTnb0a PUP S83UPUTPaO 4oadsoad qunow go 9bPTTTA eTqPOTTddp a9q4O TTP UT9a9q Pa4UVA SUOT4VTaVA 9q4 aO; 4daoxg :aaaHl No i IZ—) —as * UOT40na4SUOO abVapb I[ 9q4 44TM UOT4oun[uoo UT paned 8q TTPs AlemaATaP . ' T9APJb bUT4STX9 9T41 '9bP-1pb P9140P49P M9U P 90 UOT4ona4suoo ei4q ao; bUT'TA' oad '%S*LV 90 9J5PJ9AO0 40T 9 4Tuaad o4 a-ZOTT-VT UOT409S UlOaj UOT4PTaeA v 'pup Xovq4as paeA apTs (u9 sT) T40UT XTs 40oj quo P pup >[OPg4qs P"A ;(Paa (40 400,4 OaatM P 4TuL7z9d*0-4* Z-9-Z0T-T,-1 UOT409S Moa; UOT4VT,2eA e Aqaadoad 4oaCqnS aq4 04 4uPab Aqajalq 4oadsoad4unow go 9bvTTTA aq4 JO SeaqsruL *,;o paeog Put? 4u;9PTs9ad 9til :OM.L NOIJ13as *4oadsoad qunow JO 9bRTTTA 9144 ,TO saaqsnal go PaQO9 Pup 4u9PTs9ld aqq Aq qoRj go SbUTPUTJ SR UT9a9q pa4paod-ToOUT OaP 9AoqRUT9a9q q4aOj 49s sTP4T09a 9qLi :990--NOII;DHR :SIONIIUI 'AINnOD NOOD '10adSOUd INnOW aO aDVUUIA SHS dO SaalSnal ao auvos aNv jNauiSaUd alll XG aaMIVaaO Lj aq 'a*doaa-daHL 'MON Aq pataes aq PTnom 4oadsoad -4unow * SUOT4PPTiTA'TaPA PTPs bUT4UPab go 9b9q4 JO S-4S;;19-4UT qsaq aqq qetI4 pauTuua4ap aAeq pup 06 -A -EV V2 go qoa[qns 9q4 bUTaq' SUOT4PTaVA OT44 04 UOT4ea9PTsuOO aaq4anj U9ATb 9APq 9bPTTTA 9q4 go saa4snal go PavOg Pup 4u9PTs9ad 9q4 Pup 409asoad qunow go 9bPTITA 994 go saa4s"I 90 PaPOS PUP 4uOPTsaad 9q4 04 UOTqePUqUlMO09a pup SbUTPUTJ s4T P944Tmqns spq sTeaddV go PaPO9 bUTuOZ 9q4 'SVa-daHM Pup !066T 'AVN 90 AvP q46Z 944 uo Tpa9 qoa S ad 4 noy aq4 UT PO14STlqnd joajaq4 OOT40U a9doad pup anp o4 quvnsand 1066T 'aunt JO App q4VT aqq uo 4oadsoad 4UnOK JO ObvTTTA aq4 go sTvaddV go PaPOG bUTUOZ 9q4 aJOJ9q 06 -A -EV 'ON asPo V9Z go 4oelqns aqq bUTaq pa4sanbaa SUOTqPT-TPA 9144 UO PT914 sem bUT.IP914 OTTqnd v 'sva-d' PUP !%G*LV JO 9bPaaAO0 40T P 4TuLTad oq a'ZOTT'VT UOT409S UEOIJ UOT4PTJVA V 'pup Xopq4as PaPA 9PTS G9 sT) tj3UT XTS 400; quo v pup Xovq4as pavA apga (,E) 400J 99aq4 P 4TULled 04 i-d-ZOT-VT UOT409S MOaj SUOT4VTaPA 3[999 Sa9UOT4T49d 'SVaZIaHM PUP STOUTTTI 'Aqunoo %000 uT 'UeTPTa9N TedTOUTad PaTT41 9144 90 4sea TT 9buV-6 'q4aoN ZV dT14SUMOLL 'VE t'4,;oTOaS PTeS _40 19,4alenb qsamiq4nos 8t[4 30 3TV14 4sea 9144 go qaa; ctg 14,4noS aq4. 30 14410N bUTAT 4993 T -96Z T4qnoS atl,4 go :4999 T*S;6Z -4siam atI4 4daoxa 'aa4aenb -4s;amtZ4noS 9,4q go aa4avnb 4sea,44noS aq4 go s9aOe 5 -EZ q4aON 9144 OsTP 'UeTPTa9W TedTOUTJd PaTtZZ 9144 JO 4sea 'TT 9buPZI 'q4aON ZT, fTT4SUMOJ, "VE UOT409S UT (-JO9-Tqt[:4 S9 -10e 81L Z ti4-ION 9144 4daoxa) aa4jpnb qs;amtl4nos 914q go aaqjvnb 4sP9144ioN 9q4 JO UOTSTATpqns P bUTaq '4s9aOTTTH UT 9 400TU UT CT 4OrI :se paqTaOSOP ATTeb9T '(Aqaadoad 4oaCqnS se 04 P9a2999a a944eUT9Z9tj) 499a4S T9ssn'd 744aON COZ se UmOuN ATuOUMOO kpadoad joj IsTotiTTTI '4oadsoad -4unoK go aPOD BbPTTTA 9q4 90 VT aa4deq0 moag SUOT4eTJeA aOj UOTqeOTTdde UP P9TT3 9AVq (saauOT4T49d se 04 Paaa9JOa a943PuT9J9q) PTemu9OJ0 AJPwasoH Pup semOT41 'SiaHaHM laaUlS qaSSnX MUON COZ SV N14ONX WINOWN05 AlUadOHd HOa SNOIIVIUVA VXIINVHD aDNVNIGHO MV *ON aONVNIGUO 06/OT/LO /avo ZBA 43-V-90 Page 2 of 2 shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. -Fields Village Clerk 11990. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-47-V.90, STANLEY KWIATEK LOCATION- 1727 BONITA DATE: JULY 11, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for variations filed by Mr. Stanley Kwiatek of 1727 Bonita. The application was filed to increase the permitted 21 foot driveway width to 29 feet, and to permit an 8 foot service walk in a required sideyard. Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance allows a 3 foot service walk in a sideyard. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 28, 1990, At the meeting, Mrs. Kwiatek presented testimony in support of the request. Mrs. Kwiatek explained that they had recently removed an older, non -conforming driveway. They also removed the service walk in the sideyard. The variations are necessary in order to replace the driveway and walk in their former locations. The petitioner explained that the wider driveway provided a parking pad for their personal vehicles. The wider service walk was requested in order to provide a paved surface against the house, designed to drain stormwater away from the house, and access to a service door. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request, and it was noted that the application was filed in order to replace existing paved surfaces. The Zoning Board noted that no one objected to the request, and from all appearances the older paved areas have not had any adverse impact on the neighborhood. The Zoning Board found that the wider service walk in the sideyard is adequately screened by bushes on the neighbors' property. The Zoning Board also confirmed that all drainage would be towards the street, and not onto an adjoining property. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that the Village Board approve a request for a 29 foot driveway and 8 foot service walk at 1727 Bonita. IPJEW� 3141 mt prospect, Illinois XONIECKO arko Sektret ENGINEERING Assoc i at LAND SURVEYING PLATOFSUS VEY Block 4 in Hatlen Heights Unit #1 a Subdivision in the South half of the NortheE of Section 10, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third Princiral Meridian, ,ng to plat thereof registered in the Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook Cr LS, on August 17,1955 as Docurient #1614665. ml JW N, WITU Al-rAr-Wr:b CakeAe6e L to 1P. m 6 i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 47-V-90 Hearing Date: June 28, 1990 PETITIONER: Stanley Kwiatek SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1727 Bonita PUBLICATION DATE: June 12, 1990 REQUEST: Variations from Section 14-3016 to allow a 291 driveway. Also, from Section 14-1102.D.4 to allow an 81 service walk in the sideyard. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Robert Brettrager OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting variations from Section 14.3016 to allow a 291 driveway and also from Section 14.1102D.4 to allow an 8' service walk in the side yard. The petitioner, Angela Kwiatek, presented her case stating that they are replacing an existing driveway and sidewalk. Mrs. Kwiatek also,stated that they have standing water where the sidewalk is and this helps prevent it from seeping into the house. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that the petitioner started the work without a permit and to complete the job they must get approval from the Village. Mr. Clements also stated that there was no impact on the neighborhood before they decided to replace the driveway and sidewalk, so this new paving would have no adverse effect. Also, a tall hedge on the adjoining property helps screen the wider service walk. Chairman Basnik asked if the petitioners neighbors had any objection to the replacement of the driveway and sidewalk. Mrs. Kwiatek stated that none of her neighbors objected. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the i 2 ZBA-47-V-90 June 28, 1990 Page 2 of 2 petitioner a variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a 29' driveway and from Section 14.102.D.4 to allow an 8' sidewalk. Mr. Lannon moved. Mrs. Brothers seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy, Skowron, Basnik NAYS None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This Case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN WVI— FROM: DAVID K CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT-. ZBA47-V-90, STANLEY KWIATEK LOCATION: 1727 BONITA DATE: JUNE 21, 1990 REQUEST The applicant is requesting variations from the following: 1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 29 foot wide driveway. The Zoning Code allows a maximum of 21 feet for a two -car garage. 2. Section 14.1102.D.4 to allow an 8 foot service walk in a sidey yard rather than a maximum of 36" as allowed by Code. VILLAGE STAFF COMMNTS Engineering recommends that positive front drainage is maintained and rear downspouts be changed to comply with the Code. Inspection Services notes that no fill should be placed in the side yard and new pavement should be at or below the existing grade. MANNING AND ZONING COMMEM Mr. Kwiatek recently removed an older, non -conforming driveway. He also removed a service walk in a side yard. This work was started without a building permit, and Mr. Kwiatek was advised that he needed to obtain variations to replace the walk and driveway in their former location. The petitioner was able to obtain a permit to install a conforming driveway, but the Zoning Board of Appeals must approve the extra drive width and service walk replacement. From all indications, the driveway and walk had no adverse impact on the neighborhood before they were removed. The replacement pavement shall not cause any additional impact. The adjoining property has mature bushes screening the pavement and this helps buffer the proposed walk Staff would recommend approval, subject to the service walk being installed with drainage toward the street. DMC:hg r, `'PILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSP•..; T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER �({��/` FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING ,AND A r "�Z-OONING SUBJECT: ZBA49-V-90, ZBA-50-SU-90, RONALD REICHL, D.D.S. LOCATION: 1420 WEST LINCOLN DATE: JULY 11, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application filed by Ronald Reichl. The application effects the property at 1420 West Lincoln, and was filed for a Special Use Permit to allow a 3 -car garage, and a variation to permit a 30 foot wide driveway. The application also included a variation to reduce the 16 foot sideyard to 14.6 feet. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 28, 1990. At the meeting, Dr. Ronald Reichl presented evidence in support of the request. He explained that he has purchased the property at 1420 West Lincoln, and plans to demolish the existing home and construct a new single family residence. Dr. Reichl would like to include a 3 - car garage and wider driveway with the new house. The garage would be for personal vehicles, and not for any storage or home occupation. Dr. Reichl stated that due to concerns expressed by the staff, he would eliminate the requested sideyard variation, and provide a conforming 16 foot sideyard along the west side of the house. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, and it was noted that 3 -car garages are becoming fairly typical with construction of larger single family homes. The Zoning Board stated that with this large 135' X 180' lot, there would be sufficient area to allow the large home and 3 -car garage, and not have any adverse impact on the area. The Zoning Board also acknowledged the withdrawal of the sideyard variation. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends approval of a 3 -car garage and 30 foot wide driveway at 1420 West Lincoln. DMC:hg a" 94004A 51 Rav " 4 Kab .� Ko' R�.vtSE " l Iv' S Erp,AL jo ��� MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 49-V-90 Hearing Date: June 28, 1990 50 -SU -90 PETITIONER: Ronald Reichl, D.D.S. SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1420 W. Lincoln PUBLICATION DATE: June 12, 1990 REQUEST: Special Use permit to allow a three -car garage. Variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a 30' wide driveway. Variation from Sections 14.1002.B and 14.1004.D to allow a 14.671 side yard setback. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Robert Brettrager OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating that the petitioner is requesting a Special Use permit to allow a three -car garage, and variations from Section 14.3016 to allow a 30' wide driveway and from Sections 14.1002.8 and 14.1004.D to allow a 14.67' side yard setback. The petitioner, Ronald Reichl of 307 S. Lancaster, presented his case by stating that he recently purchased the property that is 1351 by 180', that presently has a home which he would like to replace with the proposed house. Dr. Reichl continued by stating that the property is located on the corner of Lincoln Ave. and Rob Rd, which is a very narrow street and this would make parking difficult causing the need for the variation for a 30' driveway, Dr. Reichl continued by stating the variation for the side yards is because of the height of the building. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that this property is zoned R -X which requires increased setbacks, such as the front yard must be 461 instead of 401. Mr. Clements also stated that this lot is not being over -built, 0 ZBA-49-90 ZBA-50-SU-90 June 28, 1990 Page 2 of 2 and is well under the requirements for lot coverage. However, he recommended that the length of the house be reduced to eliminate the sideyard variation. Also, there was no objection to -the three -car garage. Artis Weissenstein, 1430 W. Lincoln, stated she is concerned with the grade of the house and the height of the foundation. Mrs. Weissenstein also stated that her lot is the lowest on the block and is very concerned with the run-off of the proposed house.' Catrina Tregoning, 1 Rob Rd., stated that she is very pleased with the proposal and many of the other neighbors too. Mr. Cassidy questioned the side yard requirement. Chairman Basnik asked if the house could be reduced in length to eliminate the variation. Dr. Reichl stated that he would reduce the depth of the garage, and this change would allow a conforming sideyard. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a Special Use Permit for a three -car garage. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mr.Pratt seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a variance from Section 14.3016 to allow a 30' driveway.' UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This Case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VIZI AGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC-r PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN Wc- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT. ZBA49-V-90, ZBA-50-SU-90, RONALD REICHL, D.D.S. LOCATION: 1420 WEST LINCOLN DATE: JUNE 21, L"O REQUEST This application includes the following: 1. A Special Use permit to allow a three -car garage instead of a two -car. 2. Variation from Section 14.3016 to allow a 30 foot wide driveway. The maximum allowed by Code is 21 feet. 3. A variation from Sections 14.1002.11 and 14.1004.D to allow a 14.67 foot side yard setback instead of 16 feet required by Code. VILLAC& STAU COAMNU Inspection Services notes that a sanitary sewer exists along the private road and a 12" sanitary sewer exists along the north side of Lincoln. Also, there is an 18" field tile across the back portion of the lot and a storm inlet on the east side of the private road at the rear property Line. This sewer travels east to the Creek. Grading plans shall be submitted and should include existing grades within 100 feet of the property. Furthermore, the lots on the private road are served by a common well. There is a 10" Village watermain under the pavement on Lincoln Street. The petitioner has purchased the property at 1420 West Lincoln, and plans to demolish the existing home to construct a new, 3,687 square foot house. Dr. Reichl would like to include a three -car garage and widen the driveway with the new home. As we have seen with many new, more expensive homes, three -car garages are becoming more of a standard amenity. Three -car garages are nearby in the Kathcon Subdivision and Courts of Kennicott Staff has objection to the three -car garage and driveway width variation as long as the garage will be Mount Prospect Zoning board of Appeals ZBA-49-V-90, ZBA-50-SU-90 Page 2 The request also includes a variation of the required setback on the west property line. Because this is a larger home, the R -X Zoning District requires increased setbacks. For example, the 40 foot front yard must be increased to 46 feet. The plan meets the increased front setback. The 10 foot required sideyard must also be increased to 16 feet because of the height of the house. The applicant is proposing a 14.67 foot sideyard. It would be possible to meet the 16 foot setback if the length of the house was reduced 1.33 feet. The petitioner should fully explain why the required sideyard cannot be met. It should be noted that there is an adequate separation from the home to the west, but staff believes the home could be built on this lot without variations. Lastly, for your information, the Floor Area Ratio for the house is .15, well below the -35 permitted. Also, lot coverage is 26%. These figures demonstrate that the property is not being over -built I I OWN USA "'ALLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPrCT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER V& FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-51-Z-90, ZBA-52-SU-90, MICHAEL NAUERT LOCATION: 1920 GOLF ROAD DATE: JULY 11, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application filed by Mr. Michael Nauert. The application effects the property at 1920 West Golf Road, and was filed to rezone the property from an R -X to an R-1 Single Family District. The application also includes a Special Use Permit to allow °a residential Planned Unit Development (PUD). The purpose of the application was to obtain zoning to aflov) a four -lot subdivision. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 28, 1990. At the meeting, Attorney Peter Boland and Engineer Joel Michalik presented evidence and testimony in support of the request. Mr. Boland explained that an existing single family home will be demolished, and the 1.4 acre site subdivided to allow 4 single family homes, Mr. Michalik explained the lot configuration, engineering and trend of development. The engineer stated that the proposed lots would meet all R-1 lot size requirements, and that lot sizes are compatible with existing single family homes to the north. Mr. Michalik also described an access road to the lots from Golf Road. This access road is proposed to be a private lane. The advantage of this design is that it allows a more controlled turning movement for the homeowners of the lots, and is considered better than each lot providing a driveway to Golf Road. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning Board found that the rezoning would permit a subdivision with lot sizes that are consistent with the area. Thus, the rezoning would have no adverse effect on adjoining properties. The Zoning Board determined that the subdivision is an attractive design requiring no variations, and that this application would be acceptable to adjoining property owners. Concerning the private lane providing access to these lots, the Zoning Board believed that this roadway should be a public street, with the Village providing maintenance and snow- plowing. The Zoning Board believed it would be a burden for the homeowners of these four lots to provide their own street maintenance. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that a rezoning from an R -X to an R-1 District be approved at 1920 Golf Road, subject to dedication of a public street as an access road. DMC:hg TIF 9M5 TIF `.96 / EX � T/F 94.7 BJb 6'WOOD FENCE Tp, 'WOOD FENCE TF`. 61 w1 SHED �1. "- " -2L TV a7 D. ESMT �7 4 60 = T/F. "I a. I 97.5 I 97. I pI I. 9�7 20 I BI DO TO SE REMOVED I. ' it g G ^5 ts� �' R>94. 1 `. Ex, ca IN 0 i5, _ 9 ,c. 4 � O r R XC rF s 60 90.E q" ,s _ , 4 ~ � •' SANITARY SEWNEX CB •• 4 90.56 P:•.i c DRIVE TO 6E REMOVED r W.8. /S i MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 51-Z-90 Hearing Date: June 28, 1990 52 -SU -90 PETITIONER: Michael Nauert SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1920 West Golf Road PUBLICATION DATE: June 12, 1990 REQUEST: A rezoning from R -X to R-1 single family residential. A Special Use permit under Section 14.1101.C, 14.2502.A and 14.701.A.2.b to allow an R-1 Planned Unit Development for four single family homes. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Lois Brothers Ronald Cassidy Michaele Skowron ABSENT: Robert Brettrager OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Lois Tall, 810 S. Deborah Lane Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating the petitioner is requesting a rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single Family Residential. A special Use permit under Section 14.1101.C, 14.22502.A and 14.701.A.2.b to allow an R-1 PlannedUnit Development for four single family homes. The petitioner, Michael Nauert, represented by his attorney Edwin P. Bolan, presented his case by introducing his Engineer, Joel Mikalic. Mr. Mikalic stated that the property is located on the North side of Golf Rd. near Meier Rd. and proceeded to explain the storm sewer system stating it would be tied it to existing main on Golf Rd. There is an existing well on the property which will be capped off and the septic tanks removed. Mr. Mikalic continued by stating that roadway will meet all requirements by I.D.O.T. and Mount Prospect. Also, all M.S.D. requirements will be met, Mr. Bolan explained that this is going to be a four lot sudivision with an access road to and from Golf Rd. David Clements, Director of -Planning and Zoning, stated that the request for the rezoning is compatible.with the zoning to f ZBA-51-Z-90 ZBA-52-SU-90 June 28, 1990 Page 2 of 3 the north along Deborah Lane and Carol Lane. therefore the rezoning would not have any adverse effect on adjoining properties. Mr. Clements also stated that the access road is an excellent design preventing the four lots from having driveways onto Golf Rd. and providing more of a direct, controlled turning movement. However, the access road should be a private road with all maintenance and snow removal by the residents of the proposed homes. The reason for this is that this small road is located away from other Village streets. Lois Tall, 810 S. Deborah Lanes is interested in the size of the lots. Mr. Mikalic stated that these lots would be standard sized lots 60Ix 100'. The Zoning Board generally discussed the requests and it was determined that the rezoning would allow a subdivision that is consistent with lot sizes in the area. Also, the Zoning Board was pleased that this property could be developed with new single family homes, and not rezoned for commercial. However, Zoning Board members believed that the proposed access road should be a public street, and not a private road. The Zoning Board felt buyers of these lots should be entitled to snow -plowing and street maintenance. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioner the request for a rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single family residential. Mr. Cassidy moved. Mrs Brothers seconded. UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. Chairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the petitioners request for a Special Use permit under Sections 14.1101.0, 14.2502.A and 14.701.A.2.b to allow an R-1 Planned Unit Development for four single family homes. Mr. Lannon moved. Mr. Pratt seconded. ZBA-51-Z-90 ZBA-52-SU-90 June 28, 1990 Page 3 of 3 UPON ROLL CALL: AYES: Lannon, Pratt, Brothers, Cassidy, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. This Case must still be heard before the Village Board. Micherle Thompson Recording Secretary VILIAAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT KANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN rK- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENT -S, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-$I-Z-90, ZBA-S2-SU-90, MICHAEL NAUERT LOCATION: 1920 GOLF ROAD DATE.- JUNE 21,19" REQUE The applicant is requesting the following: 1. A rezoning from R -X to R-1 Single Family Residential. 2. A Special Use permit under Sections 14.1101.C, 142502.A and.14.70IA2-b to allow an R-1 Planned Unit Development for four single family homes. VILLAGE STAFF COMMEMM Engineering notes that State permits will be required for access to Golf Road and storm sewers. Grading plans and a plat of subdivision is required. Two private street lights are suggested. The existing well should be capped and septic tanks should be removed. Inspection Services notes that due to existing utilities on Golf Road, installation of sewer will be difficult. Because of topography, more storm sewers may be required Watermain should be looped to the existing main to the west and extended to the east property line. Fire hydrant locations will be determined by the Fire Prevention Bureau and Public Works. All Development Code requirements shall be met including street lighting and sidewalks on Golf Road. PLANNING AND ZQHW CQMZM Mr. Nauert has a contract to purchase the single family home at 1920 West Goff Road. The site is 1.4 acres. He is requesting a rezoning from the existing R -X Single Family District to a R-1 District, to allow a four lot subdivision. Also requested is a Special Use permit for a Planned Unit Development. Concerning the rezoning, the proposed R-1 zoning is compatible with the zoning to the north along Debra Lane and Carol Lane. The existing R -X zoning may diminish the property value as the parcel cannot be utilized in a fashion consistent with adjoining subdivisions. The R-1 zoning would allow a four lot subdivision that would meet all Mount Prospect Zoning and of Appealf ZBA.51-Z-90, ZBA-52-Su-90 Page 2 applicable lot size requirements, therefore the rezoning would not have any adverse of on adjoining properties. Staff also notes that, while this, property was being marketed, we reviewed several inquiries for a commercial or of use. This request is much closer to the type of redevelopment the staff would expect and encourage, and we worked to make this a design that would be attractive, require no variations, and hopefully be acceptable to adjoining property owners. Also, the rezoning meets the residential designation on the Comprehensive Plan. Lastly, the application includes a Special Use permit to allow a residential Planned Unit Development This was at the staffs, suggestion. The access road is an excellent design feature. it will prevent the four lots from each having a driveway onto Golf Road, and provide a more direct, controlled turning movement. However, the access road should be a private road with all maintainence and snow removal by the residents of these proposed homes. The Village has no public streets nearby, and snow plowing and maintenance of this access road would not be cost-effective for the Village. With a residential Planned Unit Development, the Village can require the formation of a Homeowner's Association, and the PUD Ordinance can include conditions on MSMIM and snow plowing. In this way, buyers of the homes will be more fully aware of obligations, and not look to the Village for services. This could not be done as r without the PUD. DMC.hg VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT -mj% PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL PROJECT: CHICAGO ASSEMBLY OF GOD CMMCH LOCATION:GO F ROAD DATE: 9 YES ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED tZP• PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED:- ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING M APPROVALl.- PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL_ INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL WATER MAIN _FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER 260 FT. 8" _ SIZE STORM SEWER FT. SIZE ROADWAYS SIDEWALKS 3.180 SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS STREET LIGHTS YES # 2 PARKWAY TREES YES # 10 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING 675 S.Y. RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS NO ENGINEER CLERK CLERK ENGINEER WATER MAIN 3801 , 120' FT. 6",,4" SIZE SANITARY SEWER 200' FT. 611 SIZE STORM SEWER 880 FT. 1211 SIZE ROADWAY PARKING LOTS 4,950 _ � _ SQ. YDS . LANDSCAPING „INSTALLED RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS $ES PLANNING & ZONING PUB.WKS.DIR. INSP.SERV.DIR. FIRE PREVENTION APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19 VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT APPROVAL PROJECT: KENSINGTON BUSINESSD LOCATION: #4A & #4B (BISHOP & BUSINESS CENTER), #5A & #5B (FEEHANVILLE & BUSINESS CENTER) AND #6A & #6B EEHANVIL W DATE: M&Y 1,19 0 NO ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED R. ENGINEER PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: 1 CLERK PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: 1„u,R ENGINEER ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING �,` APPROVAL +7l�.-- PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PU$.WKS.DIR. INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP.SERV.DIR. FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL_ FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC IXPROnMZXTsVILLAGE WATER M WOLFAIN N/A FT. NZA SIZE SANITARY SEWER N,/A FT, I/A SIZE STORM SEWER N/A FT. SIZE ROADWAYS N/A SIDEWALKS N/A SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS STREET LIGHTS # N/A PARKWAY TREES # /A PARKWAY LANDSCAPING NZA RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS 6 6B WATER MAIN FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE STORM SEWER FT. SIZE ROADWAY PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19 VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTry AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT: Gregogy Subdivisiop SEP LOCATION: Lonncruist & We -go DATE: Sgptembpr 21, 1989 WATER MAIN N/A FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER 180 FT. 811 SIZE STORM SEWER 202 FT. 1211 SIZE ROADWAYS N/A SIDEWALKS 350 SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS N /A STREET LIGHTS N/A # PARKWAY TREES Yes # PARKWAY LANDSCAPING 350 SY RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS NIA PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED - N/A WATER MAIN FT. SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FT ROADWAY SIZE —FT. SIZE —SIZE PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19 YES 140 ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED ENGINEER PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: CLERK PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ENGINEER ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVAL PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB.WKS.DIR. INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP.SERV.DIR. FIRE DEPARTMENT APPROVAL FIRE PREVENTION PUBLIC IMPAQVBXENT S FOR ACCEPTANCE BY VILLAGE WATER MAIN N/A FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER 180 FT. 811 SIZE STORM SEWER 202 FT. 1211 SIZE ROADWAYS N/A SIDEWALKS 350 SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS N /A STREET LIGHTS N/A # PARKWAY TREES Yes # PARKWAY LANDSCAPING 350 SY RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS NIA PRIVATE IMPROVEMENTS APPROVED - N/A WATER MAIN FT. SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER FT ROADWAY SIZE —FT. SIZE —SIZE PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19 VILLAGE • • P-ROSPECT IR ILLINOIS -• •• TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO DATE: JULY 10, 1990 SUBJECT: HOSE BIDS The Fire Department proposes the purchase of the 1990 allotment of fire hose and related fittings. Sealed bids were opened on June 13, 1990 and the results are as follows: Able Fire & Safety Equipment $11,191.75 Dolton Fire Equipment $10,650.00 Mac's Fire & Safety $10,231.75 Great Lakes $10,062.00 Able Fire & Safety Equipment and Dolton Fire Equipment were the only suppliers who bid the five inch (5") diameter hose according to our specifications, I recommend the bid be awarded to Dolton Fire Equipment who was the lowest of the two correct bids. Sufficient funds are available int he FY90/91 Budget on Page 104, Account Code *51-042-02-8017. Edward M. Cavello Fire Chief EKC/mah VILLAGE OF MOUNT k-OSPECT ILLINOIS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO DATE: JULY 10, 1990 SUBJECT: FIRE DEPARTMENT CLOTHING & GYM CLOTHING The Fire Department proposes the purchase of the 1990 uniform allotment. The total allotment was divided into two areas; gym clothing and station wear, and each was bid separately, Sealed bids were opened on June 13, 1990, The results are as follows: REUSS SPORTING $ 74.54 KALE UNIFORMS $108.25 COOPER $113.50 KREST $361.70 KALE $374.45 I recommend that Reuss Sporting be awarded the bid for gym clothing because they are low bid in this area and provide us with quality athletic wear. In the area of station wear, I recommend Kale Uniforms who did not offer the lowest bid on the entire uniform package. Both suppliers bid each individual item in the overall uniform package. A recent fire department study of past uniform purchases indicates that the item firefighters request in volume are the items that Kale has bid the lowest. Therefore, while Kale's overall bid was a bit higher, we anticipate our actual expenditure will be lower because this year's purchases will be made in a similar manner to past purchases. Sufficient funds for these proposed purchases are in the FY90/91 Budget on Page 102, Account Code #1-042-01-7110. Edward M. Cavello Fire Chief EMC/mah VILLAGE OF MOUNT PHOSPECT _ ILLINOIS INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTOM DIXON FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CXVELLD DATE: JULY 12, 1990 SUBJECT: TURN OUT GEAR BIDS The Fire Department proposes the purchase of the I990 allotment of "Turn Out Gear," Sealed bids were opened on June 18° 1990 and the results of the bid process were disappointing. Only one supplier bid on the turn out ensemble. This is an expensive item and the ' bid we did receive was higher then we have paid in the past. No supplier bid on the gloves we used as a reference and they also bid the wrong helmet, Because of this information and the fact that previous low bid suppliers were unable to offer bids at this time, I recommend that al/ bids be rejected. Edward M. Cavello Fire Chief Mount Prospect Public Works Department 1W INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7M Mn USA TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: July 5, 1990 SUBJECT: Leaf Disposal Charges For nearly 20 years, we have been hauling our annual harvest of leaves to a farm west of Barrington on Lake Cook Road. Our refuse contract with BFI stipulates that BFI must furnish the Village with three refuse trucks, each holding approximately 20 yards of compacted leaves. our annual harvest is about 7000 yards, and if we were to haul it to the Land & Lakes compost site in Wheeling, our tipping fees would exceed $50,000 per season. In the past two years, the Village has paid the landown- er, Mr. Tom Ullich, $10,000 and $16,000 per year for disposal fees. As the leaves decompose, they are worked into the ground for organic farming. Mr. Ullich has requested the following fee schedule for the fall 1990 harvest: August 1, 1990 $ 8,000 November 1, 1990 5,500 December 1, 1990 5,500 Total dumping fees . . . $19,000 With the wet spring we had this year, Mr. Ullich had problems trying to spread the decomposed leaves over his fields. He is requesting an up -front amount so he can hire someone to assist him in getting an area ready for our trucks to dump later this fall. The second payment would be made when the program is in full swing, and the final payment at the end of the program. We are assured that other haulers would not be allowed access to this site through the remainder of the season. For future years, Mr. Ullich would be willing to negotiate a multiyear contract, which could be beneficial to both parties. I recommend that the schedule of payments be approved as stated for 1990 leaf disposal by Mr. Tom Ullich of Barrington, Illinois. HLW/td STREETS/LEAFDUMP.CHG YARD WASTE RECLAMATION, INC. 123 NORTH NORTHWEST HIGHWAY P.O. BOX 778 (312) 825-5000/FAX (312) 825-0887 PARK RIDGE, IUJNOIS 60068-0778 LANDSCAPE WASTE COMPOSTING BEGINS APRIL 16, IM Beginning this year, Illinois law prohibits all landscape waste, including leaves, brush and grass clippings, from being landfilled. Land and Lakes Company is ready to accept your yard waste TODAY! Land and Lakes Company has established composting facilities throughout Northeastern Illinois to assure all of our customers that they may continue to bring landscape waste materials to our sites. LANDSCAPE COMPOSTING PRICES (Prices Effective April 16, 1990) Minimum Site Location Uncompacted Loads* Compacted Loads Truck Charg Wheeling $8.25 per yard $9.75 per yard $30.00 Dolton $6.00 per yard $7.25 per yard $30.00 Chicago (2) $6.00 per yard $7.25 per yard $30.00 Romeoville $6.00 per yard $7.25 per yard $30.00 1. Tree limbs over 6* and up to 18* in diameter will be charged double yardage. 2. Tree trunks and stumps over 18' in diameter will be charged triple yardage. LANDSCAPE COMPOSTING REGULATIONS 1 Grass, leaves and tree brush may be mixed. 2. Noplastic bags of materials are accepted. 3. All paper bags are acceptable for composting. 4. Loads of yard waste may not be mixed with any garbage, rocks, cans or bottles, etc. S. Brush must be tied with string or cloth. No nylon cord or wire permitted. Questions? Please call George Brabec (708) 825-5000. PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER