Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
3765_001
Next Ordinance No. 4204VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE Next Resolution Na. 32-90 4 A G E N D A VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S 8 REGULAR MEETING Meeting Location: Meeting ROOM, let Floor Senior Citizen Center 50 South Emerson Street Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 I. CALL TO ORDER Ii. ROLL CALL Meeting Date and Time: Tuesday July 3, 1990 7:30 P. M. — JULY 3, 190 Mayor Gerald "Skip') Farley Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floras Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg Ill. INVOCATION - Trustee Floros IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, June 19, 1990 V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT VI. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD VII. MAYOR'S REPORT A. Request for Class 11R11 liquor license for a Chinese restaurant, Dragon City, in the Brentwood Square Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads. B. Request for a Class "C" liquor license for a retail packaged goods establishment at the Brentwood Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads. C. Appoint Janice Farley to Mount Prospect BiCentennial Commission, filling the position vacated by Rachel Toeppen. D. Diamond Fest Committee Status Report VIII. OLD BUSINESS A. ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church 1400 East Kensington Road 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH, LOCATED AT 1400 EAST KENSINGTON ROAD This Ordinance grants variations to permit a lot coverage of 61% rather than the permitted 35% in an R -X zoning district; 512 parking spaces rather than the required 543; and, a building height of 40 feet, rather than the permitted 28 feet. (Exhibit A) B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE) This Ordinance creates a one way street, northbound for Boxwood Drive and amends those Sections of the Traffic Code affected by this change. It also changes the permitted area for parking from the east side of the street to the west side. (Exhibit B) IX. NEW BUSINESS A. ZBA 38 -SU -90 and ZBA 39-V-90, 1200-1380 S. Elmhurst Road The Petitioner is requesting an amendment to the Huntington Commons Planned Unit Development to allow 504 parking spaces for the apartments south of Huntington Commons Road immediately west of Elmhurst Road in order to allow the construction of garages. Also requested are variations to allow a 9-1/2 foot side yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0. B. ZBA 41-V-90, 2016 Hopi Lane The Petitioner is requesting a variation to replace an existing circular driveway and allow a 40% impervious lot surface coverage, rather than the permitted 35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. C. ZBA 42-V-90, 107 West Orchard Place The Petitioner is requesting a variation to replace an existing driveway 16.5 feet wide and to permit a 1.5 foot side yard setback. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. D. ZBA 43-V-90, 203 North Russel The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a 1.681 side yard setback and 1.691 rear yard setback for a new garage and to allow an impervious lot surface coverage of 47.5%, rather than the permitted 35%. By a vote of 5-1, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the requested 1.681 side yard setback, however, by a vote of 6-0 recommended granting a rear yard setback of 2-1/2 feet. E. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF REAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT This Ordinance authorizes the sale of property owned by the Village, 433 West Rand Road, through sealed bids. (Exhibit C) X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT A. Bids: 1. Self-contained breathing apparatus 2. 8 parking collection boxes 3. Fuel Tank removal from village Hall lot B. Proposal for the maintenance and repair of the Cable T.V. equipment C. Request to authorize General Counsel to appeal the Disconnect Law Suit to the Illinois Supreme Court. D. Request to increase the engineering fees for the George/Albert Streets improvement. E. Status Report XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS 0 A. Accept public improvements required for the Chapman Subdivision, Lonnquist & Elmhurst Road B. Accept public improvements for Kingston Court & Feehanville Drive, within the Kensington Center for Business. XII. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT JUNE 19, 199.0 CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. 70,473 ROLL CALL 4,355 Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley 83,821 Trustee Ralph Arthur 443,400 Trustee -Mark Busse - 4,570 Trustee Timothy Corcoran (arrived late) Trustee Leo Floros P.W. Facility Construction Fund A Trustee George Van Geem P.W. Facility Construction -Fund B Absent: Trustee Theodore Wattenberg Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund INVOCATION Special Service Area Const. #5 The invocation was given by Trustee Busse. INVOCATION APPROVAL OF MINUTES Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved APPROVE to approve the minutes of the regular meeting of MINUTES the Mayor and Board of Trustees held June 5, 1990. Debt Service Funds Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Flexcomp Trust Fund Nays: None Escrow Deposit Fund Motion carried. Police Pension Fund APPROVAL OF BILLS Firemen's Pension Fund Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, APPROVE BILLS moved to approve the following list of bills: General Fund $783,743 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 70,473 Community Development Block Grant Fund 4,355 Illinois municipal Retirement Fund 83,821 Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 443,400 Parking System Revenue Fund 4,570 Risk Management Fund 75,537 P.W. Facility Construction Fund A - P.W. Facility Construction -Fund B - Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 30,960 Special Service Area Const. #5 - Special Service Area Const. #6 - Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) 2,800 Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) - Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - Debt Service Funds 179,987 Flexcomp Trust Fund - Escrow Deposit Fund 10,148 Police Pension Fund - Firemen's Pension Fund Benefit Trust Fund 2,167 $1,691,961 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem, Nays: None Motion carried. • COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD None. Trustee Corcoran arrived at this point in the meeting. Page 2 - June 19, 1990 MAYORIS REPORT CITIZENSHIP Mayor Parley introduced the following residents who AWARDS stopped to help a victim of a traffic accident who was trapped in her burning vehicle: James Quinn James Weeks Michael Mueller Dan Griggs Michael Allred Mayor Farley and Police Chief Pavlock presented Citizenship Award plaques and expressed their appreciation for their services. JOSEPH BELMONTE Police Chief Pavlock and Mayor Farley presented an Outstanding Service Award to Police officer Belmonte for his outstanding service for saving the life of an occupant of a burning apartment building. AWARD: SEAT BELT Mr. George Corson, representing the Governor's Task SAFETY Force on Occupant Protection presented the Mayor with a plaque for the Village's program on seat belt safety. JACK REEFER A Resolution was presented honoring the many contributions of Jack Keefer and the fact that he has been chosen as Grand Marshall of the 1990 July 4th Parade in the Village. RES.NO. 25-90 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved for passage of Resolution No. 25-90 A RESOLUTION HONORING JACK KEEFER, GRAND MARSHALL OF THE 1990 JULY 4TH PARADE IN MOUNT PROSPECT Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Farley Nays: None Motion carried. FRANK BIERMANN A Resolution was presented honoring Frank Biermann, who died last week at age 93, having served on the Mount Prospect Volunteer Fire Department for over 40 years, and having served as Fire Chief for nearly 30 years. RES.NO. 26-90 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for passage of Resolution NO. 26-90 A RESOLUTION NOTING THE PASSING OF FRANK BIERMANN Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Farley Nays: None Motion carried. CLASS 11R11 A request for a Class "R" liquor license was presented LIQUOR LICENSE for a Chinese Restaurant in the Brentwood Square BRENTWOOD Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads. Since the SHOPPING CENTER Petitioner was not in attendance to answer questions, this subject will be presented again at the next meeting on July*3rd. Mayor Farley made no appointments. Page 2 - June 19, 1990 NEW BUSINESS ZBA 28-Z-90, 29 -SU -90, 30-V-90, 720 East Rand Road ZBA 28-Z-90 Ordinances were presented for second readings that ZBA 29 -SU -90 rezone the subject property from B-3 to B-4 to permit ZBA 30-V-90 a fast food restaurant;'a Special Use to permit a drive-thru fast food restaurant 1,629 square feet in size; variations to allow a 13.51 front yard, instead of the required 101, a 31 side yard, instead of the required 101, a 51 rear yard, instead of the required 201; and to waive the required 121 x 351 loading space. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting the requests for rezoning and variations by votes of 6-0 and to grant the Special Use by a vote of 5-1. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for ORD.NO. 4196 for passage of Ordinance No. 4196 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE AS IT PERTAINS TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 720 EAST RAND ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ORD.NO. 4197 for passage of Ordinance No. 4197 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 720 EAST RAND ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem. Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved for ORD.NO. 4198 passage of Ordinance No. 4198 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 720 EAST RAND ROAD Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Kays: None Motion carried. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to KAMYSZ PLAT authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his SUBDIVISION signature on the Kamysz Plat of Subdivision (consolidation). Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem. Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 34-V-90, 404 North Prospect Manor ZBA 34-V-90 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that 404 PROSPECT would grant a variation to permit a 2-1/2 foot MANOR side yard setback, instead of the -required 5 feet in order to construct a garage. -The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Van Geem, Page 3 - June 19, 1990 seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4199 Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4199 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 404 PROSPECT MANOR Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 37-V-90 ZBA 37-V-90, 105 North Waverly Place 105 N.WAVERLY PL An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would grant a variation to allow an impervious lot surface coverage of 57%, instead of the permitted 45`x. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended 'granting this request by a vote of 6-0. At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 37-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO.4200 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Ordinance No. 4200 AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 105 NORTH WAVERLY PLACE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. ZBA 25-A-90 ZBA 25-Z-90, Text Amendments TEXT AMENDMENTS An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would amend various sections of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) to better list and define permitted obstructions in the side and front yards. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these amendments by a vote of 6-0. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. Page 4 - June 19, 1990 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO. 4201 for passage of Ordinance No. 4201 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING ORDINANCE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. An ordinance was presented for second reading that AMEND CH. 15 would create regulations governing landscaping in LANDSCAPE ORD. the Village. The regulations governing landscaping would be made a part of the Village Code by creating Chapter 15, presently "Reserved". Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO. 4202 for passage of Ordinance No..4202 AN ORDINANCE CREATING CHAPTER 15 OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ENTITLED "LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE" Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church ZBA 31-V-90 1400 East Kensington Road The Petitioner is requesting variations from the parking standards to reduce the number of required parking spaces from 588 to 512, to permit a lot coverage of 61t, rather than the permitted 35%, and a variation to permit a building height of 40 feet, rather than the permitted 28 feet. The Zoning Board voted 2 for approval and 5 to deny, resulting in a recommendation to deny these requests. Gregory Gann, attorney for the Petitioner, presented this case noting that the subject property, approximately'9 acres in size, zoned R -X - Single Family Residential, was purchase approximately 4 years ago. This site was former known as the Feehanville School. Mr. Gann noted that the existing church was destroyed by fire last November and since there had been discussion to increase the size of the sanctuary, this would be the appropriate time to present a plan. The variations being requested are a result of modifications to the original request that was presented to the Zoning Board of Appeals. The original plan included a seating capacity of 2,000 for the sanctuary, which has been reduced to 1,400. The setbacks will meet the Code requirements and the proposal for 3 curb cuts on Kensington Road has been reduced to 2 curb cuts. Mr. Gann stated that the requese for 61% lot coverage, versus the permitted 35%, is a result of the Village regulations governing an R -X zoning district, pointing out that commercial property is permitted 75% coverage. Page 5 - June 19, 1990 Mr. Gann also stated that there is a 2-/12 acre parcel of land between the existing church site and the proposed site, and that land is owned by the River Trail Park District. The Petitioner has been in contact with the Park District officials to discuss the possibility of trading of properties so the existing property at the northwest corner of Kensington & Wolf Roads could be incorporated into one large parcel. The following residents expressed their opposition to the variations being requested: Resident, 805 Newberry Resident, 1611 Ironwood Bertie Selinger, 1103 Sycamore Resident, 806 Newberry Resident, 1311 Ironwood Tim Metling, 1609 Ironwood Idyl Nipper, 1120 E. Cardinal These residents stated that while they supported the church they were concerned about their property values, and the pollution caused by the vehicles in the parking lot. They also expressed concern about the volume of traffic exiting the parking lot on to Kensington Road and the possibility of those vehicles using the residential streets. Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to grant the variations requested in ZBA 31-V-90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Floros, Van Geem, Farley Nays: Busse, Corcoran Motion carried. An ordinance will be presented July 3rd for first reading. RECESS Mayor Farley called a brief recess at this point, 10:18 PM RECONVENE The meeting was reconvened at 10:29 PM Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley Trustee Arthur Trustee Busse Trustee Corcoran Trustee Floros Trustee Van Geem Absent: Trustee Wattenberg FAIR HOUSING A Resolution was presented expressing the intent of the Village to comply with recently passed legislation relative to local regulations on housing from the developmentally disabled. The Resolution states that the Village will, following the required hearing process, amend the Zoning ordinance to delete the existing sting regulations. Page 6 - June 19, 1990 Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved RES.NO.27-90 for passage of Resolution No. 27-90 A RESOLUTION STATING THE INTENT OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT TO MEET THE FAIR HOUSING ACT OF 1988, AS AMENDED, AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY RESIDENCE LOCATION ACT OF 1989 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize SUBURBAN entering into an Agreement with the Suburban PRIMARY Primary Health Care Program, Inc. HEALTH CARE PROGRAM Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution No. 28-90' RES.NO. 28-90 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL, INC. PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROGRAM Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize ILL.PRAIRIE entering into an agreement with the Illinois Prairie GIRL SCOUTS Girl Scout Council, Inc. Boxwood Summer Program. BOXWOOD Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved SUMMER PROGRAM for passage of Resolution 29-90 RES.NO. 29-90 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL, INC. BOXWOOD SUMMER PROGRAM Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. A Resolution was presented that would authorize BOXWOOD entering into an agreement with the Illinois Prairie ADVOCACY Girl Scout Council, Inc. - Boxwood Advocacy Program. PROGRAM Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved for passage of Resolution 30-90 RES.NO. 30-90 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN.THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL, INC. BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem • Nays: None Motion carried. Page 7 - June 19, 1990 Page 8 - June 19, 1990 VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT AMEND 1989/90 Village Manager John, Fulton Dixon presented an BUDGET ordinance that would amend the village budget for fiscal year 1989/90. Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. ORD.NO. 4203 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for passage of ordinance No. 4203 AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1989/90. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras, Van Geez Nays: None Motion carried. PUBLIC SAFETY A proposal was presented from Donohue & Associates to BUILDING prepare a schematic design for the proposed Public Safety Building. The cost to provide the schematic design is not to exceed $43,550.00. DONOHUE & Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to ASSOCIATES concur with the recommendation of the Village Manager and accept the proposal submitted by Donohue & Associates to prepare a schematic design on the proposal Public Safety Building at a cost not to exceed $43,550.00 Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Florosf Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. PROHIBIT DOGS village Manager Dixon stated that the Mount Prospect Park District would like to discuss the enforcement of their policy to prohibit dogs from their property, since the Park District has an agreement with the Village for the Police Department to enforce the Park District's regulations. MELAS PARK Mr. Dixon also noted that the Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights Park Districts have prepared plans for the development of Melas Park and they should be submitted to the Village soon. HISTORICAL The village Manager informed , the Board that the Mount MUSEUM Prospect Historical society has received a response to their request to waive the required handicap access to the new museum, provided an area is made available for a handicapped person to view a video tape of the various rooms ,and exhibits in the museum. This approval from the State will reduce the cost of renovation by thousands of dollars. BIDS: Village Manager Dixon presented the following bid Page 8 - June 19, 1990 results for a street sweeper and related options: STREET SWEEPER Bidder Model Amount Bruce Municipal Elgin Pelican 11P11 $78,400.82 Equipment Co. Schuster Equipment Athey Mobil H10A-2 $84,393.00 Company Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved BRUCE to concur with the recommendation of the administration MUNICIPAL and accept the low bid submitted by Bruce Municipal EQUIPMENT Equipment Company at a cost not to exceed'$78,400.82. COMPANY Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. The following bids were received for approximately SIDEWALK 20,000 sq.ft. of sidewalk for the sidewalk replacement REPLACEMENT program, which is the 50/50 plan with residents: PROGRAM Bidder Total A. Lamp Construction $39,369 Schroeder & Schroeder $48,911 J R & V Construction $50,330 T. S. concrete Co. $72,690 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved A.LAMP to concur with the recommendation of the Village CONST. Manager and accept the low bid submitted by A. Lamp Construction to remove the old and install approximately 20,000 sq. ft. of sidewalk at a cost not to exceed $39,369. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. Bids were received from the following companies TOWING for the 3 year towing contract with the Police CONTRACT Department: Prospect Auto Body A.O.K. Towing Millman's Towing Len & John's Towing A breakdown of the bids is attached to these minutes. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved PROSPECT to accept the low bid submitted by Prospect Auto AUTO BODY Body and authorize a 3 year contract to provide the various towing required by the Police Department. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem Nays: None Motion carried. Page 9 - June 19, 1990 AMBULANCE Bids were requested for a new ambulance chassis and CHASSIS the remount of the existing patient compartment module. One bid was received as follows: Emerg A Star $37,523 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved to concur with the recommendation of the administration and accept the bid submitted by Emerg A Star in the amount of $37,523 for the purchase of an ambulance chassis and remounting of it on the existing patient compartment module. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Seem Nays: None Motion carried. BOXWOOD DR The following bid was received for the improvement , IMPROVEMENT of Boxwood Drive, which involves widening the westerly side of Boxwood Drive to provide diagonal parking. Bidder Amount Arrow Road Construction $325,758-02 Village Manager Dixon noted that IDOT had a bid out at the same time as the Village's and therefore only one company bid on the Village's project. He also noted that since Randhurst Shopping Center is remodeling for J. C. Penney, the Village has made arrangements with Randhurst Corporation for residents to park their vehicles in the Randhurst parking lot, which will be a big benefit for everyone involved. Trustee Van Geem expressed his concern that this is a large project and only one bid was received. He suggested the item be re -bid or delayed. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to accept.the low bid submitted by Arrow Road construction in the amount of $325,758.02 for the Boxwood Drive improvement project. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Seem Nays: Corcoran,.Van Geem Motion carried. TRANSFER CDBG A Resolution was presented that would authorize FUNDS transferring Community Development Block Grant Funds (CDBG) from various projects in order to finance the Boxwood DriveImprovement project. RES.NO. 31-90 Trustee Arthur, seconded by trustee Busse, moved for passage of Resolution No. 31-90 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR THE BOXWOOD DRIVE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT Upon roll call: ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Seem Nays: None Motion carried. Page 10 - June 19, 1990 A request was presented, in conjunction with the Boxwood roadway improvement project, to amend the existing agreement between the Village and Midwest Consulting Engineers to include inspections services. It was noted that when the agreement was executed in 1989 the Engineering Division of the Village planned to make the necessary inspections as the Boxwood roadway improvement proceeded, however, due to the increased workload on the inspectors, they will not be able to inspect this project. Village Manager Dixon suggested the contract with Midwest Engineers be amended by increasing that contract by an amount not to exceed $15,000. Mr. Dixon noted that the $15,000 would provide for the Consultant to perform all the up front work including staking out and survey work and the Village staff will make the inspections, thus realizing a savings of $10,000.. Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to authorize a Change Order to the Midwest Consulting Engineers, Inc. Agreement increasing the contract amount by $24,181.00 which will cover the cost of inspecting the Boxwood Drive roadway improvement project. Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem Nays: Corcoran Motion carried. CHANGE ORDER: MIDWEST CONSULTING ENGINEERS - BOXWOOD ANY OTHER BUSINESS An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would AMEND CH.18 amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) to provide for the BOXWOOD DR. new alignment of Boxwood Drive following the improvement. Boxwood Drive will be a one-way road in a northerly direction, beginning at the southern intersection of Boxwood Drive and Wheeling Road. The Ordinance also provides for parking on the westerly side of the street and parking around the 'inner section' of Boxwood Drive would be prohibited. The following residents spoke on this subject: Mr. Norman, 1068 A Boxwood Drive Bruce Levin, 1212 Boxwood Drive Sandy Schultz, 1208 Boxwood Drive Resident, 1136 Boxwood Drive Mr. Norman expressed concern relative to the objectional conduct of some of the residents of the area, noting that it is a matter of police enforcement. This Ordinance will be presented July 3rd for second reading. Trustee Busse announced that he would not be able to attend the Committee of the Whole meeting on June 26th. EXECUTIVE SESSION 9 Mayor Farley asked for a motion tb go into Executive EXECUTIVE Session for a brief discussion on labor negotiations. SESSION: LABOR Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to NEGOTIATIONS Page 11 - June 19, 1990 go into Execution Session- orcoran, ploros, Ayss: Arthur, Busse, C upon roll call: Van Geem Nays: None , Notion carried. 0 Executive Session at The Village Board went into 11:12 P-14- meeting at 3_1-36 P.M. Mayor Farley reconvened th RECONVENE roll call: Mayor FarlsYb u upon !r Present Trustee Art Trustee Busse,C Trusteeorcoran Plor0s Trustee Van Gee" Trustee was . in Executive .It was noted that the Village Board Session to discuss labor negotiations. ADJOUPjMZWT seconded by Trustee corcoranr moved ADJOURN Trustee Arthur# the Meeting' to adjourn Unanimous Upon roll call: Ayes: Motion carried, The -meeting was adjourned at 11.37 P -K - Carol A. Fields Village Clem 0. Page 12 - June 19, 1990 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT CASH POSITION June 28, 1990 Cash & Invest Receipts Disbursements Cash & Invest Balance 6/15/90 through Per Attached Journal Balance 6./14190 6!28190 List of Bills Entry 6/28!90 General & Soecial Revenue Funds General Fund 3,471,506 $ 414,635 $516,880 <18,000> $ 3,351,261 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 620,989 98,358 - 719,347 Community Development Block Grant Fund 6,301 22,000 22,401 5,900 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 4,333 15,250 11,155 8,428 Motor Equipment Pool Fund - - 17,615 18,000 385 Entergrise Funds Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 3,456,927 124,580 81,940 3,499,567 Parking System Revenue Fund 258,439 5,216 37,544 226,111 Risk Management Fund 1,194,670 3,735 57,356 1,141,049 CaRital Projects Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund 734,787 239 6,009 729,017 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985 155,032 - - <14,593> 140,439 Downtown Redev Const Fund 1987 - Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - _ _ _ Debt Service Fund 918,384 - - 14,593 932,977 Trust & Agency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund 6,821 4,438 6,598 4,661 Escrow Deposit Fund 1,404,899 17,727 14,176 1,408,450 Police Pension Fund 14,660,497 151,573 43,464 .14,768,606 Firemen's Pension Fund 16,556,366 169,541 43,279 16,682,628 Benefit Trust Funds 259,361 - 259.361 $43.709.312 $1.027.292 ILI.41Z $43.878,187 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS AIR ONE EQUIPMENT* INC. ANTHONY POOLS ARCHADECK OF LAKE COOK ARMOR SYSTEMS CORPORATION DANIEL GALAS BELING CONSULTANTS• INC. ROBERT F. BRZEZINSKI CENTURY AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CITIBANK• N.A. CLAYTON. AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT R. M. COLLINS CO. CUSTOM DECKS BY ROYER CUSTOM MOOD WORKS RONALD DEAU DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT CO JOSEPH DOOLAN FAGEL EMS SPECIALTIES FIRST NAT*L BANK OF MT. PROS. ROBERT FISHER FLEXC OMP DISBURSEMENTS GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT PAUL M. HELLER AND ASSOCIATES♦ VICTOR HERMAN HOFFMAN GROUP ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT CO INVERNESS TITLE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/26/90 PURCHASE OESCRIPTIUN INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL AIR ONE EQUIPMENT $957.95 $957.95 BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 BOND REFUND 6100.00 $100.00 MAY CHCS $328.28 $3L8.28 REFUND FINAL BILL $31.92 REFUND FINAL BILL 63.08 s35. n SERVICES RENDERED 51.669.09 S19669. TRANSFE►i TAX REFUND $198.00 $198.00 REFUND OUPL LIC PMT $35.00 135.00 GAB -PMT OF INS CLAIMS $LI9065.61 SL19065.61* BOND REFUND 5100.00 3100.00 PMT P/R 6/28/90 5224.25 $224.25 BONO REFUND $100.00 6100.00 BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 BOND REFUND 535.00 135.U0 PAYROLL PERIOD b/28/90 519927.94 PAYROLL PERIOD 6/28/90 $473.88 PAYROLL PERIOD 6/28/90 $356693.77 PAYROLL PERIOD 6/28/90 $3609614.47 53989710.06* BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 SUPPLIES $40.60 $40.60 DUE TO FED DEP PAY b/14 $L19154.76 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6/14 $87.98 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6/14 $36.25 s DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6/14 $2.779.73 DUE TO FED DEP PAY 6/14 $819.65 $149878.37* BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 MEDICAL BENEFIT REIMB $59805.74 DEPENDENT CARE REIMB $792.00 $69597.74* FIRE HOSE S1*988.00 $19988.00 WAGE DEDUCTION 85MI-032858 $622.51 $622.51* BOND REFUND $15.00 $25.00 REFUND NUISANCE ABATEMENT FEE 610*000.00 $10*000.00 BOXM000 ADVOCACY PROGRAM $4►664.00 S4#664.00 TRANSFER TAX REFUND 5282.00 $282.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL CLEARING ACCOUNTS J.R.E V. CONSTRUCTION# CO. REPLACE SIDEWALKS Si9375.00 MAIN BREAK RESTORATION s30435.00 34*810.00 SEAN P. JOYCE REFUND FINAL MATER BILL 575.24 REFUND FINAL MATER BILL 67.26 $62.50 ANDREA JUSZCZYK PMT P/R 6/28/90 5254.00 $254.00 ROBERT KUZMANIC BONO REFUND 571.87 BOND REFUND $25.00 s96.Y' LEXINGTON DEVELOPMENT BOND REFUND $450.00 5450. BETTY M. MCGOVNEY REFUND DUPL STAMP PURCH 5178.00 5178.00 R. NAEGELE BONO REFUND $100.00 $100.00 RAY O*HERRON CO.# INC. SUPPLIES $19066.16 $19066.16 MIKE D*MALLEY BOND REFUND 520.00 $20.00 PENSION DISBURSEMENTS JUNE POLICE PENSION DISE $43#463.74 JUNE FIRE PENSION DISE $43#279.19 $86*74Z.93* REUSS GYM CLOTHES $19089.50 GYM CLOTHES $428.00 S1*51T.50 RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES SERVICES RENDERED $189869.65 SERVICES RENDERED $18#869.66 S37*739.31 MICHAEL V. SCAMARCIA BOND REFUND 5500.00 $500.00 SCARSDALE DEVELOPMENT* LTD. REFUND FINAL HILL $54.72 REFUNO FINAL BILL 54.53 $59.25 STATE OF ILLINOIS LIQUOR APP RECORD CK 560.00 sbO.0uo STbRINO* RAMELLO 4 DURKIN REFUND OUP TRANS TAX $174.00 $174.00 SUN OFFICE EQUIPMENT CO.* INC. OFFICE FURNITURE $2#007.87 $29007. RAI THORUP BONO REFUND s25.00 S25.0u THREE LINE CONSTRUCTIONS INC. BOND REFUND $500.00 $500.00 DEAN VICTORSON REFUND FINAL BILL $22.80 REFUND FINAL BILL $2.20 $25.00 VILLAGE CHRISTIAN BOOK STORE BOND REFUND $100.00 $100.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT REINSPECTION FEE C3521 $25.00 REINSPECTION FEE C6603 $75.00 REINSPECTION FEE 06096 $30.00 REINSPECTION FEE C7053 $15.00 REINSPECTION FEE $25.00 MATER TAP REFUND C7366 $275.00 $445.00 WHITE CONSTRUCTION BOND REFUND 5100.00 $100.00 VENDOR CLEARING ACCOUNTS WHITE HEN PANTRY NOLTMAN CONSTRUCTION JEROME ZERVIC CLEARING ACCOUNTS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28!90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION REFUND OVERPMT 9910*11/89 BOND REFUND BOND REFUND INVOICE AMOUNT $480.36 s100.00 s i 00.00 ***TOTAL** GENERAL FUND EXPENSES 63919004.50 COMMUNITY OEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $11#154.76 WATER t SEWER FDND PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND s5LO.13 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND SL9988.00 POLICE PENSION FUND FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND 54392-79.19 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 5149175.76 PAGE 3 TOTAL 6480.36 SLOU.00 s100.00 SS909BbO.21 569679.92 $609960.86 3119065.61 $439463.74 569597.74 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE REGISTRATION - NATTENBERG 6125.00 $125.00 PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL** $125.00 GENERAL FUND SL2 5.00 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE JOHN BURG EXPENSES 5165.23 5165.23 BURKE AND RYAN SERVICES RENDERED $29750.00 $29750.00 IPMA-CHICAGO METRO CHAPTER DUES -PIKE s10.00 $10.00 JOHN F. DIXON EXPENSES si24.8D 6124.80 GLASS* HILLS DALLMEYER E ROTH* SERVICES RENDERED $89706.00 689706.00 CABLE TV OPERATIONS AA SWIFT PRINT* INC. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT $39080.85 PAGE 4 R.t. JENKINS ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $300.00 $300.uO JOHN KEANE PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 $10.00 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMUUNT TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE JUNE 1990 STIPEND SLOO.OG s1Q0.00 HOLT FAMILY HOSPITAL EMP PHYSICAL-MOHORIC $45.00 645.00 ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC DUES -BURG $105.00 s105.00 ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE DIRECTORIES $25.00 $25.00* NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $52.22 $52.21 PEMA GRANT WRITING REGISTRATION-SKURLA $75.00 575.004 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $4.16 # JERRY RAJCZYK MISC EXPENSES $174.69 $25„00 ROSCOR CORPORATION MISC EXPENSES $23.58 $202. ► V E G PRINTERS INC. BUSINESS CARDS - PIKiE $44.00 S44.uu VON BRIESEN AND PURTELLv S.C. SERVICES RENDERED $39342.12 $39342.12 VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE s*#TOTAL#xc 6159646.80 GENERAL FUND $15:646.80 CABLE TV OPERATIONS AA SWIFT PRINT* INC. VILLAGE NEWSLETTER $39080.85 sl9080,85 R.t. JENKINS CABLE NEWS INSERT $300.00 $300.uO JOHN KEANE PROD CREW 6/16/90 $10.00 BO MTG PROD CREW 525.00 s35. - MICHAEL LOCASHIO JUNE 1990 STIPEND SLOO.OG s1Q0.00 CAROLYN A. MILLER PROD CREW 6/16/90/ $10-00 HO MTG PROD CREW $25.00 $35.00 PHYLLIS MOLIERE PROD CREW 6/16/90 $10.00 110.00 NATIONAL LEAGUE OF CITIES 3 ENTRIES GOVT AWARDS $65000 $65.00 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 320.58 $20.58# APRIL RAJCZYK 80 MTG PROD CREW $25.00 $25.00 JERRY RAJCZYK BD MTG PROD CREW $25.00 $25„00 ROSCOR CORPORATION REPAIRS 6120.00 s12U.00 CABLE TY OPERATIONS ###TOTAL#a $3.816.43 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE at28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND 539816.43 #a*a**#* as♦**as�aaaaaas*aa*assaaa.s a*aa*#aaaaaaaaaaaa*aaa*a�tas�aaaa�*aat*#aaaaaaaa*aa�*aaaaaaa #aaaaa�aas**aaar�# FINANCE DEPARTMENT ACCOUNTEMPS TEMP HELP - MORTELL 5558.75 $558.7,'+ DECISION DATA SERVICE INC. SERVICE CALL 3/8 $300.00 $300.k ILLINOIS CPA SOCIETY DUES-WIDMER s110.00 $110.u0 ILLINOIS GFOA REGISTRATION -D JEPSON $35.00 $35.00 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM MTCE AGREEMENT $19239.84 519239.84 MOORE BUSINESS EQUIPMENT DIV. SERVICE $242.19 5242.19 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES S19.30 # MISC EXPENSES $5.10 $24.40# PITNEY BOWES INC. MTEE AGREEMENT SCALE 6135.00 $135.00 POSTMASTER EXPRESS MAIL DEPOSIT 5100.00 s100.00s PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED MAY PA OGRAMMING SERVICES $956.25 $956.25 FINANCE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** 33.701.43 GENERAL FUND S39701.43 VILLAGE CLERK#S OFFICE THE DRAWING BOARD INC. HOOKLETS $28.60 628.60 R.T. JENKINS JULY -AUG NEWSLETTER $1#335.45 $19335.45 NATIONWIDE PAPERS PAPER 5633.75 $633.75 NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $386.15 6386.15 PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL PAGE $372.92 5372.92 POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR NEWSLETTER $29298.05 52#298.05* SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE DELIVERY SZ3.60 523.60 STERLING CODIFIERS# INC. ZONING BOOKLETS E CODE REPRINT $4053.00 $49753.00 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** 4%83L.52 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28190 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND $99831.52 RISK MANAGEMENT BROOKFIELD REVIEW FEES Si*314.00 MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 6114/90 1239029.98 MED CLAIMS THRU 6122/90 $10*012.58 HMO ILLINOIS HLTH INSURANCE JULY 56*959.56 MAGNUM AUT0140TIVE P-9 BODY REPAIRS $19560.32 P-11 BODY REPAIRS $29345.90 CHRISTOPHER NAGY REIMBURSEMENT 5749.54 NORTH SUBURBAN CLINIC LTD. SERVICES 6124.00 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL SERVICES RENDERED 531.00 STATE TREASURER# EX -OFFICIO CU RATE AOJ FUND ASSESSMENT $163.14 RISK MANAGEMENT ***TOTAL** RISK MANAGEMENT FUND 5409290.02 INSPECTION SERVICES a 5349 356.'. !69959.50 $3*906.22 1749.54* $IZ4.00 $31.00 $163.14 S-t6*290.02 BLAIR BUSINESS SERVICES* INC. SERVICES RENDERED $432.00 SERVICES RENDERED s108.00 $540.00 BUILDING PERMITS LAW BULLETIN SUBSCRIPTION $59.78 $59.78 CONSTRUCTION BOOKSTORE MANUALS $264.85 $264.85 RODNEY ERB CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $104.77 5104.77 FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE SANITARY REPORTS $174.00 $174.00 GREGORY G. GRAHAM CLOTHING ALLOWANCE $22.03 s22.Ui LES HANNEMAN REIM11-PLBG INSP FEE $27.00 $27.00 NORTHWEST STATIONERS IMC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $72.86 672.86 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES SS.10 65010# POLICE DEPARTMENT AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 6571.75 PAGE T BUSSE CAR MASH• INC. ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT $280.00 $280.00 CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICES PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 $66.70 $66.70 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES BINDERS L MANUALS 330.00 $135.00 QUALEX• INC. FILM $25.20 525.20 TELEDYNE POST SUPPLIES $231.90 $231.90 THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S INSPECTIONS $100.00 INSPECTIONS $266.00 5365.00 INSPECTION SERVICES EXPENSES ***TOTAL** il•893. RICHARD L. ORAFFONE EXPENSES 311.27 611.27 GENERAL FUND $1*893.49 $24.00 s24.00 POLICE DEPARTMENT AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION SERVICE - MAY 90 6571.75 6571.75 BUSSE CAR MASH• INC. WASH MAY 90 $280.00 $280.00 CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICES REPAIRS $66.70 $66.70 COMM. ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW REGISTRATION $105.00 BINDERS L MANUALS 330.00 $135.00 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT-5422-A $8.57 68.57 CURTI S 1000 INCORPORATED ENVELOPES $92.48 ENVELOPES 682.70 ENVELOPES 6235.33 $410.5'1 JOHN DAHLBERG EXPENSES 66.00 $6.00 RICHARD L. ORAFFONE EXPENSES 311.27 611.27 JOHN GROSS EXPENSES $24.00 s24.00 H R HART PHOTO MAY 90 FILM PROCESSING $86.58 $86.58 HANSEN ASSOCIATES MAINT AGMT E COPIES $114.08 MAINT AGREEMENT 6298.08 $412.1e THE HERALD AD - P/T CLERKS 5103.20 $103.20 I -PAC MEMBERSHIP FEE $50.00 550.00 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 750 9 15 G 6134.37 $134.37 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM MTCE AGREEMENT $826.56 $826.36 KALE UNIFORMS CSO - CLOTHING $156.85 HANDCUFFS 634.95 6193.80 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE d ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6%28%90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT LAKE FOREST POLICE DEPARTMENT NIPAS-NO IL POC ALRM sl*500.00 51:500.00 LATTOF CHEVROLET* INC. PARTS - MAY 90 $1*067.53 sl*067.53 LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG EQUIPMENT $668.45 SUPPLIES $82.08 PHOTO EQUIPMENT $408.05 PHOTO EQUIPMENT $22.75 S1*I8i.33 LITTLE AMERICA MAY 90 PRISONER FOOD $80.15 $80.15 LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS S OFFIC SUPPLIES $49.16 SUPPLIES $8.62 SUPPLIES $118.80 SUPPLIES $62.66 SUPPLIES $34.16 SUPPLIES $21.68 SUPPLIES 68.62 SUPPLIES $45.00 $348.70 JOE MITCHELL BUICK* INC. CAR RENTAL $100.00 s10U.00 MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST STARTER 535.00 535.00 MOTOROLA* INC. EQUIPMENT 1913.00 $913.00 MOTRA TRANSMISSIONS REPAIRS $675.00 S675.00 MAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS $178.80 $178.80 NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI TUITION - HALACHOULIS* MOSER $70.00 TUITION - WISNEIWSKI $25.00 $95.00 NOkTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE PARKING TICKETS $1.066.56 sl*066.56 NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY RZEPECKI* GROSS* PACKHEISER $795.00 $795. NOTARIES ASSOCIATION OF ILLINO NOTARY HONG - DIBLASI $27.00 $27- 27-RAY RAYO•HERRON CO.* INC. GUN CASE $133.80 1133.80 TAMARA PACKHEISER TRAINING PROGRAM $42.71 $42.71 PAODUCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL AD $26.81 $26.81 PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $30.33 a MISC EXPENSES $9.50 s MISC EXPENSES $55.80 MISC EXPENSES $4.08 MISC EXPENSES 66.06 MISC EXPENSES $19.42 MISC EXPENSES $6.93 MISC EXPENSES 3IZ.68 a VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6128/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT MISC EXPENSES $7.00 MISC EXPENSES $12.79 MISC EXPENSES $7.58 S172.17* Ek IC E. PIES RADIO REPAIRS 539750.00 RADIO REPAIRS 5734.00 $4.484.00 PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL STRAYS MAY 90 6468.00 S4b8.i- QUALEX9 INC. FILM PROCESSING $91.97 $91.E QUICK PRINT PLUS• INC. BULLETINS (48.70 548.70 REBEL -S TROPHIES• INC. RETIREMENT PLAQUE 574.91 674.91 RICOH CORPORATION SERVICE AGMT 6260.00 5260.00 MICHAEL SALATINO EXPENSES (90.00 290.00 SAVE -A -PET STRAYS MAY 90 $210.00 5210.00 SCHWAAB# INC. RUBBER STAMPS $40.20 540.20 SMITH 6 WESSON ACADEMY TUITION - LANGE 6450.00 51450.00 TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DIST. 214 CUSTODIAL CHCS - POLICE TEST $96.00 $9b.00 THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE SOFTWARE s49.95 TUITION-MITCHEM• SMITH $19200.00 31*249.95 TRI -R SIGNS REPAIRS $70.00 170.00 VILLAGE SPORTS CENTER* INC. AMMUNITION $69.76 569.76 MICHAEL WISNIEWSK1 CAREER SURVIVAL PATROL OFFICERS 510.10 510.10 XEROX CORP. SERVICE COPIER $180.00 $ido.00 POC'ICE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** $199652.( GENERAL FUND $159902.62 CAPITAL IMPRV+ 6 REPL. FUND $3#750.00 FIRE 6 EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. SUPPLIES $25.38 $25.38 CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO SERVICE $52.47 SERVICE 635.02 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1J ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28190 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. SERVICE $86.04 SERVICE /40.86 SERVICE $57.69 5271.08 CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY DONUTS FOR CLASS $16.20 516.20 CHICAGO HEART ASSOCIATION BROCHURES $36.00 $36.00 CHICAGO SUBURBAN TIMES NEWSPAP SUBSCRIPTION $8.87 $8.87 ROBERT CLARK EXPENSES $40.00 S40.0n COMPUTERLAND COMPUTER PROGRAMMING $800.00 SUPPLIES $436.00 $1:236.UU CREST COMPUTER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT %413.40 $413.40 CURTI S 1000 INCORPORATED ENVELOPES $92.47 $92.47 DAY-TIMERS• INC. BALANCE ON SUPPLIES $1b.50 $16.50 FAGEL EMS SPECIALTIES SUPPLIES $1.00- $1.00 JAMES-FLORY - F.D. EXPENSES $123.00 $123.00 FORCE 4 COMPUTE,' SUPPLIES $231.26 COMPUTER SUPPLIES S2i.88 $254.14 GALLS• INC. ARROW PULSE LIGHTS $393.61 $393.61 GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES REPAIRS $43.75 $43.T5 GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT SUPPLIES $325.00 SUPPLIES 5462.00 SUPPLIES $442.51 MAP LITE $150.00 FLASHLIGHTS 6125.00 ROAD FLARES $140.48 515644. HANSEN ASSOCIATES MAINT AG MT E COPIES $114.07 $II4.t'. IGE• INCORPORATED CYLINOEM RENTAL 618.00 SUPPLIES (51.14 $69.14 ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 575 9 15 G $413.57 244 9 15 G 626.52 244 9 15 G 522.23 5462.32 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM MTCE AGREEMENT $826.56 5826.56 INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF F ONE YR MEMBERSHIP $90.00 $90.00 MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST VOLTAGE REGULATOR $58.62 $58.62 NATIONAL FIRE/ARSON REPORT SUBSCRIPTION $24.00 $24.00 NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL IN-STATION FEE sIV824.1T 3 VISITS MAY 90 6225.00 $2:049.17 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE I1 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. NORTHWEST STATIUMERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 614.27 $14.27 PAGE AMERICA JUNE SERVICE $34.13 .NNE SERVICE $27.30 .MINE SERVICE $20.48 681.91. PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT. MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG x6.49 MTGr SUPPLIES• TRNG $8.00 MTG* SUPPLIES♦ TRNG $18.75 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $10.00 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG 63.17 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $10.80 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $8.37 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG 676.93 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG 540.49 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG $2.25 MTG• SUPPLIES* TkNG 67.35 MTG* SUPPLIES* TkNG $1.55 MTGv SUPPLIES• TkNG 610.89 MTG• SUPPLIES• TRNG 68.99 MTG* SUPPLIES* TRNG 66.42 $220045 QUALEX* INC. SUPPLIES $22.59 622.59 RADID SHACK EQUIPMENT $271.31 6271.31 REYSS GYM CLOTHES 6.02- 6.02 R. SCHMITT SUPPLIES $129.00 $129. SERVICE AMERICA CORP. NATIONAL FIRE ACADEMY-IPSEN $159.60 61'59.6 SOCIETY OF EXECUTIVE FIRE OFCR MEMBERSHIP $25.00 $25.00 SULLIVAN PRESS INSPECTION FORMS $72.00 672.00 DENNIS TRILL - F.D. EXPENSES $40.00 $40.00 TRISTAR INOUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN. PARTS $431.53 PARTS $221.06 6652.59 UNO-VEN PRODUCTS GASOLINE 6345.00 6345.00 TOM WHITE WATER JUG $14.33 $14.33 FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ***TOTAL-** `610*357.30 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TJTAt GENERAL FUND $109035.94 CAPITAL IMPRV. 6 REPL. FUND 1271.31 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED JULY $289299.00 $2.80299.0J CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $280299.Ou GENERAL FUND $289299.00 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. 339 9 3G S $35.97 $35.97 ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM MTCE AGREEMENT $423.28 (413.28 PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES 621.00 $Z1.00* THE SALVATION ARMY BUDGET ALLOCATION $19875.00 $10875.00 SHELTER* INC: BUDGET ALLOCATION $29250.00 $29250.00 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION ***TOTAL** $4,595... GENERAL FUND $49595.25 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT BEST -HOLM CONSTRUCTION COMPANY CDBG-711 GREENWOOD $15#450.00 $159450.00 CO PUBLICATIONS SUBSCRIPTION $271.00 $271.00 VENDOR PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT* PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT GENERAL FUND VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION OFFICE SUPPLIES MISC EXPENSES MISC EXPENSES $94.48 INVOICE AMOUNT $62.75 510.69 521.04 ***TOTAL** COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT PAGE 13 TOTAL 162.75 * 131.73* 115*t�t5.�f8 $15,721.00 s*a*s**a**a**a*a*a*sa*as�*s�sssaasasras�ss*s *** **ssgaaa****�a***s*saa*�r**as***aas*a* a* a�* s�xaaas�*crass saa�a�a** *a STREET DIVISION AETNA TROCK PARTS PARTS 630 45 ALDUS CORPORATION ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER CHICAGO TURF S IRRIGATION CLS UNIFORM RENTALS COMFORT SUPPLIESv INC. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COURTESY HOME CENTER PARTS $93.96 $124.41 SOFTWARE 125.00 #25.80 PAVING MATERIALS $1.485.80 i1y485.80 CLOTHING $100.50 $100.50 DOOR CLOSERS $119.00 $119.00 MA TER I AL S i 140.20 PATCHING MATERIALS 6220.00 MATERIALS 1220.00 MATERIALS $355.00 MATERIALS $40.00 MATERIALS $40.00 $1*015.20 SUPPLIES $447.10 1447.10 SUPPLIEs $5.42 SUPPLIES $I81.72 SUPPLIES ;38.73 $225.87 UNIFORM SERVICES 335.34 UNIFORM SERVICE 315.92 $91.26 HTG SUPPLIES $213.51 $213.51 BFSO-JT-17006 $179.52 $119.52 SUPPLIES $52.18 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6128190 VENDUR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION SUPPLIES 59.49 $bi.67 DREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS, IN MOTOR $130.90 SL3U.90 FOLGERS FLAG E DECORATING, INC FLAGPOLE $37.95 $37.95 W. W. GRAINGER INC. SUPPLIES 149.31 549.31 HELLER LUMBER CO. SUPPLIES $22.37 SUPPLIES 511.88 $34.25 DALE HENORICKSEN SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT $82.00 582.01) INGRAM ENTERPRISES, INC. TURF MOWING $700.00 STJO.+. ARTHUR KOPP SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT $82.00 s82.0u LATTOF CHEVROLET* INC.. PARTS - MAY 90 $185.04 PARTS - MAY 90 5232.15 5417.19 LEWIS EQUIPMENT CO. EQUIPMENT $12.83 EQUIPMENT 553.62 566.45 LUSE OILS, INC. SUPPLIES $437.80 $437.80 MURRAY AND TRETTEL INC. SUPPLIES $72.20 $72.20 NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS 57.94 PARTS S6.00 - PARTS 559.60 PARTS 670.81 PARTS $29.75 $162.10 NEENAH FOUNDRY CO. SUPPLIES $19368.00 SLs3bd.00 NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES 5119.58 SUPPLIES $58.03 SUPPLIES $77.22 SUPPLIES S75. T8 SUPPLIES $24.25 SUPPLIES S t66.30 ELEC PARTS $39.18 SUPPLIES 537.15 5597.49 NORTHWEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER E SUPPLIES $342.95 5342.95 NORTHWEST STATIONERS IRC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $12.20 OFFICE SUPPLIES $76.80 $89.00 PREFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL PAVEMENT STRIPING 539455.36 139455.36 PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $t.92 s TRAVEL E SUPPLIES 56.60 TRAVEL 6 SUPPLIES $21.65 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE i5 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE. DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL STREET DIVISION TRAVEL C SUPPLIES $3.07 e TRAVEL E SUPPLIES S.67 TRAVEL. E SUPPLIES $24.05 TRAVEL E SUPPLIES 17.76 S65.TZ* POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY PARTS $79.88 PARTS $99.28 PARTS $75.40 PARTS 645.94 PARTS s1T.30 CREDIT PARTS $11.30- $300.50 RUDALE BOOKS LANDSCAPE BOOK $28.30 $28.30 ROUTE i2 RENTAL CO.* INC. CHIPPER RENTAL $840.00 $640.00 SECURITY LIGHTING SYSTEMSy INT LIGHTING SUPPLIES SLu4.2G 5104.20 SHEPP PEST CONTROL JUNE SERVICE s40.00 JUNE SERVICE $40.00 JUNE SERVICE $40.00 JUNE SERVICE 540.00 JUNE SERVICE 540.00 JUNE SERVICE 140.00 $240.00 SHEMIN NURSERIES* INC. TREES s187.20 $187.20 SIMON E SCHUSTER INC. "CYCLOPEDIA s34.T1 634.71 R.G. SMITH EQUIPMENT CO. CYLINDER 519312.75 sl*312.75 STANDARD PIPE t SUPPLY INC. FLBG SUPPLIES 142.70 PLBG SUPPLIES 67.65 PLBG SUPPLIES 117.36 PC BG SUPPLIES $12.30 PLBG SUPPLIES 538.95 6118.96 P. R. STRETCH VEN MTC SUPPLIES $765.64 $765.64 TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY SUPPLIES $74.38 SUPPLIES $117.71 s192.09 TRAFFIC GUIDE TRAFFIC GUIDE ARROWS $440.00 $440.00 TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI ELECTRONIC SUPPLIES $22.57 s2G.57 MAY -KEN CONTRACTORS SUPPLT CO. SUPPLIES $10.04 510.04 STEVE NOHLBRANOT SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT s82.00 $82.00 STREET DIVISION *"TOTAL** $169958.47 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE lb ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMUUNT TOTAL GENERAL FUND 516#958.47 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION ABM• INC. AETNA TRUCK PARTS AMERICAN INDUSTRIAL ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA AURORA TRUCK BODY INC. BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER BRISTOL HOSE E FITTING CLS UNIFORM RENTALS COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMMONWEALTH EDISON FE6ERAL EXPRESS CORP THE FILM LIBRARY FRANZ OFFICE PRODUCTS FREDRIKSEN E SONS GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES HELLER LUMBER CO. ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO. EQUIPMENT PARTS CLOTHING FILM PARTS SUPPLIES SUPPLIES SUPPLIES FITTINGS FITTINGS FITTINGS PARTS UNIFORM SERVICES UNIFORM SERVICE BJ'SG-JT-23598 SH67-3T-1310-A 8872 -3T -5608-D DELIVERY SAFETY FILMS SAFETY FILMS MISC OFFICE SUPPLIES EXTINGUISHER SERVICE REPAIRS TIRES ,SUPPLIES 424 9 IS B 068 9 15 B 660 9 15 B 153 9 15 G 575 9 15 G 303 9 3G S $900.00 $93.96 $100.50 $77.8d $13.03 $19.68 $206.03 $250.66 $48. Tb St%6u $8.1T $30.41 $15.33 115.93 $4s 687.64 (62.42 $119.19 $15.50 se [.Oc; $81.00 $2$8.24 $20.00 $171.85 $205.92 $59.20 $3 1.06 $533.12 $37.57 $16.88 $16.'88 $24.95 $900.00 593.94 $100.5 $77.84 S13.U3 $476.37 $112.94 $91.26 14:687.64 1181.61 115.50 $162-6- $218.24 $20.00 $317.77 $59.20 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION WATE4 AND SEWER DIVISION PAGE It INVOICE AMUU"41` TOTAL $1d.17 338 9 15 G $18.09 155 9 L5 G ILLINOIS TELEPH04E SERVICE CON MTCE AGREEMENT R. E. JAC13BY COMPANY PUMP LATTOF CHEVROLET* INC. PARTS - MAY 90 $3,9255.00 CAR * ENTALS LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS C OFFIC SUPPLIES $255.12 SUPPLIES ,579.80 SUPPLIES NEVER MATERIAL CO. DRAIN SAND MID -WEST METER C0.• INC. COUPLINGS MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS♦ INC. TONER MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC SERVICE MAY 90 NAPA AUTO PARTS PARTS s1.96 PARTS 363.90 PARTS $14.21 PARTS NATIONAL ELECTRIC CABLE MISC CABLES NET MIDWEST• INC. MAY 90 MATER SAMPLES NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY SUPPLIES s6L7.76 SUPPLIES NORTHWEST FIRE EXTINGUISHER C SUPPLIES NOATHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $9.18 TRAVEL E SUPPLIES $102.73 TRAVEL 6 SUPPLIES $25.00 TRAVEL 6 SUPPLIES $ 9.80 TRAVEL 6 SUPPLIES 620-49 TRAVEL t SUPPLIES $27.11 TRAVEL C SUPPLIES $80.34 TRAVEL L SUPPLIES POSTMASTER POSTAGE FOR WATER BILLS RAINBOW I. MR PHOTO EXP. FILM PROCESSING TRAFFIC GUIDE TRAFFIC GUIDE ARROWS DAVE WAGNER HYDRANTS PAINTED WEARGUARD JACKETS PAGE It INVOICE AMUU"41` TOTAL $1d.17 $18.09 5646.7z $826.56 6826.56 5890.00 $890.00 S1r971.63 $3,9255.00 35v22U==' $34.75 $255.12 ,579.80 1369.67 1245.15 $245.15 $134.40 584.40 $175.1.6 $175.16 $35.27 135.27 $6.08 s1.96 363.90 $14.21 $86.21 $345.32 $345.32 $235.00 $235.00 5343.44 s6L7.76 $961.20 s 342.95 S342.145 $191.94 1191. 550.24 $9.18 $102.73 $25.00 $ 9.80 620-49 $27.11 $80.34 $324.89* i424.7I $424.T1* s1.2J st.zo 5440.00 $440.00 $81.00 sti 1.00 589.98 $69.98 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN IST PMT -EQUITY CHG 669091.00 $8*091.00 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 18 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6128!90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION WEST SIDE TRACTOR SALES PARTS $i20.9L $120.91 ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS SUPPLIES $80.00 MISC MATERIALS $601.03 $661.03 ZONICS, INC: SUPPLIES 5345:.10 OFFICE SUPPLIES $i69.80 %514.90 NATER AND SEWER DIVISION "*TOTAL** $20,478.70 WATER E SEWER FUND 3203978.70 ag#*a*asaa*ga*ggg#gg**aa*aaas#aas�saa*a#�a######a#*#aa##aaa*gaga,a*aa*aaas�aa#a#s�asaa��a�aaF#*a�#aasmsaa*a*a PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY DOOR CLOSER 595.90 $95.90 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BH66-JT- 0498-A %21.49 0H66 -JT -3710-A $8.57 BH66-JT-5262- A $147.59 BH66-JT- 5266-C $152.86 SH68-JT-7498-A $21.49 $352.00 JA68S AND SONS, INC. RR PARKING REMAB $36,579.78 $36,579.78 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 19 E NORTHWEST HWY $6.45 $6. PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION ***TOTAL** $31.034.13 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $37#034.13 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN IST PMT -EQUITY CHG 669091.00 $8*091.00 VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT PAG£ 11 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6/28/90 VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION GENERAL FUND $809L.00 !00TOTAtl* 689091.ou CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS CHICAGO TURF L IRRIGATION TORO LAWN TRACTOR 517v6t4.71 S17te14.71 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS #!!TOTAL#! 5179614.71 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL. FUND 617:1114.71 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES AA'SWIFT PRINTS INC. FLYERS 5145.39 $145.1 COMMONWEALTH EDISON BGZI-JT-1838-A $50.91 k, SH67-JT- 3858-8 18.94 559.85 JOMN ENGEL SIGNS 3110.00 1110.00 MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL SOCI BUDGET ALLOCATION IST PMT S2r875.00 520875.00 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL** 539190.24 GENERAL FUND 53:190.24 VENDOR DEBT SERVICE FUNDS VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL FUND ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT PAYMENT DATE 6f28190 PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL FLOOD LOAN INTERST 078!90 $10829 FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL OT/l/90 S2*935.44 S39643.T3 "*TOTAL** $39643.73 139643.73 i85$�4IS.5� DATE RUN 6/28/90 VILLAGE JF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 TIME RUN 12.02.+#8 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING I0-APPBAR SUMMARY BY FUND 6/28/90 NO. FUND NAME AMOUNT 1 GENERAL FUND $516x879.95 23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT S22t400.92 24 ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND lli*154.70 41 NATER E SEWER FUND $81*939.56 46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $37x544.26 48 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND $179614.71 49 RISK 'MANAGEMENT FUND S57055.63 51 CAPITAL IMPRV. S REPL. FUND S6*009.31 T1 POLICE PENSION FUND $43.463.74. 72 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND $43;279.19 T3 FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND f6*597.7q 74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND Sl4vIT5.76 TOTAL ALL FUNDS 18589415.53 *as�asa�ss.�as�as�6asaagtaasaaaasassass�A��s�aae as�ss�aa�st�saas��saasa��sssaaa�ss+ts as�a�a�a aarga�s�ta+sgz�at�s VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT FINANCIAL REPORT May 1, 1990 - May 31, 1990 13 Fund Revenues Expenses Fund Balance for for Balance Apr 30, 1990 May, 1990 May. 1990 May 31, 1990 General and Special Revenue Funds General Fund $ 3,354,012 $1,360,555 $1,414,050 $ 3,300,517 Motor Fuel Tax Fund 627,378 93,643 - 721,021 Community Development Block Grant Fund - 11,000 5,661 5,339 Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 15,667 278 70,836 < 54,891> Enterprise Funds waterworks & Sewerage Fund 3,835,666 713,757 322,469 4,226,954 Parking System Revenue Fund 238,653 14,825 2,667 250,811 Risk Management Fund 1,215,074 20,520 122,656 1,112,938 Capital Projects Capital Improvement Repl or Repair Fund 715,032 1,935 151 716,816 Corporate Purpose Improvement 1989 - - - - Downtown Redev Const Fund (1985) 188,864 2,895 56,936 134,823 Downtown Redev Const Fund (1987) - - - - Debt Service Funds 885,707 63,920 - 949,627 Trust & AF-ency Funds Flexcomp Trust Fund - - - - Escrow Deposit Fund - - - - Police Pension Fund 14,656,687 30,058 39,544 14,647,201 Firemen's Pension Fund 16,545,243 28,428 41,591 16,532,080 Benefit Trust Funds 263,229 483 2,167 261,545 5&2.541,212 $2,342.297 52,078,728 842,804,781 13 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD O1 ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO OUOGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL GENERAL FUND TAX REVENUE 1-UOU-00-4001 TAXES-CORPURATE CURRENT 1,514,500 1-000-00-4002 TAXES -CORPORATE PRIOR 1,7[3,300 t-000-00-4004 TAXES -GARBAGE CURRENT 745,600 L-000-00-4005 TAXES -GARBAGE PRIOR 926.600 1-UOO-OU-4010 TAXES-RUEBROG CURRENT 12.000 L-000-00-4011 TAXES-RDCBRDG PRIOR 12.000 1-000-00-4013 RETAILERS OCCUPATION TAX5,92'+*000 1-000-00-4014 SALES TAX -SPECIAL PAYMNT L-000-00-4015 FOREIGN FIRE INS TAX 12,000- t-000-00-4016 AUTO RENTAL TAX 6,000 1 -UOQ -00-4017 REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX 525.000 1 -000 -UO -4018 FOOD E BEVERAGE TAX 550,000 L-000-00-40ZJ ELECTRONICS GAME TAX 12,000 1-000-00-4064 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX L-000-00-4065 PERSONAL PROP REPL RLB TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1,45Zt000 FEE REVENUE 1 -QUO -00-4101 EUILOING PERMIT FEES 275,000 t-000-00-4L0Z ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES 45.000 L-GUO-00-4104 PLUMBING PERMIT FEES 21,500 L-000-00-4105 PLAN EXAMINATION FEES 5u,000 1-000-00-4106 STREET OPENING FEES 500 t-000-00-4107 VEHICLE LICENSE FEES 730,000 1-000-00-4108 _DUG LICENSES 12.000 1-000-00-4209 LIQUOR LICENSES 127,500 t-000-00-4110 'USINESS LICENSES 160,000 1-000-00-411Z PUBLIC 1MPR INSPECTIONS 65.000 1-000-00-4113 RENTAL FEES 45,000 1-000-00-4114 FEES -BOARD OF APPEALS 15,000 1-000-00-41L5 CENTEL FRANCHISE FEES 31,000 L-000-00-4116 UFLL SYS FRANCHISE FEES 92,000 L'000-00-4119 ELEVATOR INSPECTIONS 13.000 1-OOU-00-412U FALSE ALAR`? FEES 10,000 L-UUG-00-4121 CABLE TV FRANCHISE 155,000 1-000-00-4123 LANOLORO/TENANT FEES 35,000 TOTAL FEE REVENUE Z,291 1.888,500 INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 25,660- L-UGO-60-4150 STATE INCUmE TAX I,TTS.000 t-000-00-4151 STATE SALES TAX - 225,000 1-000-00-4152 STATE INCOME TAX -SP PMT 1,500,000 1-000-00-4154 GRANT-SR.CITIZEN TAXI 400- 1-000-00-4155 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPD 53,969 L-030-00-4156 EMPLMT COUNSELOR GRANTS 20.000 L-000-00-4159 FLOOD REIMBURSEMENTS 483 1-000-00-4160 2ECYCLING GRANT 2.500 1-000-00-4161 GRANT - POLICE M E G 10.000 L-000-00-4162 GRANT-ILEC POLICE TRGN Zu,000 1-000-00-4163 GRANT -STATE FIRE TRAING 27,500 1-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX t37.500 4 PAGE 1 UNREC•0 % BALANCE BALANCE 6AL 126. ZOO 1,514,500- 1,5L4,50C- 100- 143,608 1.723,300- 1,723,300- 100- 62,l33 745,600- 745,600- 100- 77.216 926,6U0- 9260600- l00- t,OUO 12.O0U- 12,000- 100- L,OOO 1Z,OU0- 12.000- !00- 493.750 523.535 523,535 5,401.465- 5,401.465- 91- 0 0 500 712 712 5,288- 5,268- de - 43.750 13,921 13,927 511,073- 511,073- 91- 45.833 52.268 SZ,Z68 497,732- 491.732- 90- 1.000 !2,000- 12,000- 100- 0 0 995.998 590,442 590.442 11361.558- ' 11.361,558- 582- 22,916 L9,621 19.621 255.379= 155,379= 93- 3.750 3,495 3.495 41.SU5- .1.5u5- 9Z - Z,291 1,840 1.840 25,660- 25,660- 93- 4,166 4,853 4.853 45.147- 459147- 90- 41 t00 100 4UO- 400- 80- 60,833 53,969 53.969 676,031- 676,031- 93- 1,000 483 483 11,518- 11,517- 96- 10,625 111.100 1IL.100 16.400- 161400- 13- 13,333 8,043 8.043 151,957- 151.957- 95- .5,416 65,000- 65.000- LOU - 3.750 45,000- 45.000- 100- 1,250 5,267 5.267 9,733- 9,T33- 65- 2,583 31.000- 31,000- 100- 7,666 7,619 7x619 84,381- 84.381- 92- 1,083. 13,000- 13.000- 100- 833 340 340 9,6b0- 9.660- 97- 121916 12,15t 12.151 142,849- 142,849- 92- 2.916 27.832 279832 7*168- 7.168- 20- 157,368 256,713 256.713 1,631,788- 1.631,787- 86- 147x916 Z37,783 2379783 1,537,217- t.537,Z1T- 87- 10,416 1.383 7,383 117.617- 117,617- 94- 125,000 168.356 168.356 1.331.644- 19331.644- 89- 0 0 1,666 20,000- 20,000- t0C- 0 208 2.500- 2,500- 100- 833 10.000- 50.000- LUG - L.666 20.000- 20,000- t00- 1,458 17.500- 17000- l0U- 11.458 137.SU0- 137.500- 100- 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE' 2 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5131190 L970-91 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO UNREC-D BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAC GENERAL FUND - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1-000-00-4165 PERSONAL PROP REPL RES 3.500 291 389 389 3.1tt- 3.111- 89 - TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 3.611,000 300.912 413,911 413.911 3.197*089- 31197*089- 139 - SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 1-000-00-4175 W 6 S SERVICE CHARGE 200.000 16,666 2009000- 200,000- 100- L-000-00-4177 MAINT OF STATE HIGHWAYS 50.000 4,L66 50.000- 509000- too - 1 -000-00-4178 FOREST RIVER RURAL FPO 14.500 1.208 1.4.500- 14.500- 100- 1-000-00-4180 AMBULANCE TRNSPRT FEE 45.000 3,750 27099 1.099 429901- 42.901- 95- TJTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 309,500 251790 2.099 2,099 307,401- 3070401- 99 - PARKING REVENUE 1-000-00-4216 FINES - LOCAL 135,000 11.250 t3,569 13,569 1219431- .1219431- 90- 'L-000-00-4217 FINES - CIRCUIT COURT 145.000 12,003 17,008 17,008 127.992- 117,992- 88- 1-000-00-4218 FINES - LOCAL ORDINANCES 500 41 500- 500- 100 - TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 2d0.500 239374 30,577 30.577 249.923- 249,923- 89 - OTHER REVENUE t-OOO-00-4231 SALE OF CODE BOOKS 1,500 125 97 97 1,403- 1,403- 94- 1-000-00-4233 SALE OF REFUSE BAGS 312,500 26.041 9.272 99272 303.228- 303,228- 97- I-ODU-00-423'5 RECYCLINGINCOME40,000 3.333 40,000- 40,000- 100- 1-000-00-4243 SENIOR CENTER REVENUE 5,000 416 180 180 4.810- 4,820- 96- 1-000-00-4244 SPECIAL DETAIL REVENUE 10,000 833 274 Z74 9,7;;6- 99726- 97- 1-000-00-4245 REIMB-SERVICESGPROPERTY 15,000 19250 958 958 14.042- 14,042- 94- 1-000-00-4246 REIMB - YOUTH COUNSELING 35,000 2,916 35,000- 35.000- LOU - L -000-00-4247 POLICE 6 FIRE REPORTS 12.000 1,000 1,149 1,149 10,851- 10.851- 90- 1-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 290,OUO 24,166 6,241 6,241 283.759- 283,759- 98- 1-000-00-4249 MISCELtANEOUS INCOME 25,000 2,083 4041 4.741 20.259- 20,259- 81- 1-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 30,000 2,500 30,000- 309000- 100- 1-000-00-4251 MROT INTEREST DISTRIBUTN 0 1-000-00-4253 INTEREST - ESCROW FUND 90,000 71500 3.776 3.776 86.224- 86,224- 96- 1-000-00-4155 FLOOD LOANS INTEREST 16,000 1,333 L,427 1.421 14.513- - L4,513- 91- 1-000-00-4256 FLOOD LOANS PRTACIPAL 40,000 39333 12.955 12,955 27,045- 27,045- 68- 1-000-00-4262 MAINT. JF STATE HWYS. 0 1-000-00-4264 REIMB - CENTRAL ROAD 0 1-000-00-4265 WULF ROAD REIMBURSEMENT 0 1-000-00-4267 WOLF RD REIMBURSEMENT 0 t-OOU-00-4268 SCHOENBECK ROAD REIMS 40J;000 33,333 400,000- 400,000- 100- 1-000-00-4169 FOREST AVE REIMBURSEMENT ZL-.000 1,750 ZI.000- 21,000- too- l -000-00-4270 TRANS FROM TRUST ACCTS 0 1-000-00-4273 SURVEILLANCE REVENUE 0 1-000-00-4275 SHARE) CUST-SIDEWALK 25.000 2,083 11.277 - 11,277 I3,123- 139723- 55- 1-000-00-4276 SHAREJ COST -TREE REPLC 60,000 5.000 6.024 69024 53,976- 53,976- 90- 1-000-00-4277 FIRE TRAINING PROGRAM 20.000 1,666 8.430 8,430 11,570- 11,570- S8- 1-000-00-4199 GENERAL CLEARING ACCOUNT 12 12 12 12 0 TOTAL OTHER REVENUE 1,448,000 120,661 66.813 66,813 !,381,187- 1,381,187- V5- TOTAL GENERAL FUNU - 9.499.500 1,624.103 1,360,555 1,360,555 8,128.946- 18,128,945- 191- 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31190 1990-9t Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MU 31,)OGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FLOOD CUNTROL REVENUE FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 21-OGU-00-4190 FLOOD CONTROL S£RVCE CNG 305.000 Z5.416 BALANCE TOTAL SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 305.000 25.416 - TOTAL FLOOD CONTRUL RcVENUE FUND ---------------------------------------- 305.000 25.416 LOU- MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 305.000- 100- 76- INTER GUVERNME NTAL REVENUE 91- 278 16.222- 0 22-GOU-00-4157 M F T ALLOCAIION 1.15.1.000 95*333 69.173 2Z-ODU-00-4242 REIMB:IRSEMT ON PROJECTS 41.000 3.416 92- 22-000-00-4145 REIMBURSEMENT GEN FUND 528.725- 528.725- 98- 22-000-00-4248 INTER ST INCUME 19.000 1.543 4.470 ZZ -000 -UO -4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME 574.725- 578.72.5- 98- T3TAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 1.2tu.U00 IUO*832 93.643 TOTAL MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND 1.210.000 100.832 93.643 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 23-000-00-4155 CDOG URANT 539.IZ5 44.977 11.000 23-000-00-4241 PROGRAM INCOME 50.000 4.166 T3TAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 587.725 49.143 11.000 TOTAL COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT ------------------------------------- 539.T25 49.143 11.000 ill'. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND TAX REVENUE 24-U00-00-4055 TAXES - CURRENT 30T.600 25.633 24 -000 -UO -4056 TAXES - PRIOR 313.600 26.133 24-UUO-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP R£PL TAX 52.500 4.315 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 673*100 56.141 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 24 -000 -OU -4228 TRANS-GENERALlCABLE TV 13.400 1. t16 24-OOU-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 3*100 258 278 TJTAL INTERFU'AD TRANSFERS L6*500 1.374 278 TOTAL ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 690.200 57.515 2T8 --------------------------------------- LIBRARY FUND TAX REVENUE R PAGE 3 UNREC'0 1.060.828- 1,0600 BZ7- BALANCE BALANCE BAL 305.000- 305.UU0- lUU- 31)S.000- 305.000- LOU- 305.000- 305.000- 100- 89.173 1.060.828- 1,0600 BZ7- 92- 313.600- 41.000- 41.000- 100- 100- . 6T3*700- bT3.700- 0 4.470 14.530- 14.53.0- 76- 2:822- 91- 278 16.222- 0 93.643 1.116.358- 1.116.357- 92- 93.643 l.IL6.358- 1.116.357- 92- I1.0QO 528.725- 528.725- 98- 50.000- 50*000- LUC- 119000 574.725- 578.72.5- 98- 11.000 578.725- 578.725- 9b- 307.600- 307.6UO- t00- 313.600- 313.600- 100- 52,500- 52.500- 100- . 6T3*700- bT3.700- 100- 13.400- 13.400- LOU - 278 2.822- 2:822- 91- 278 16.222- 16.222- 98- 278 689.922- 689.922- 100- - TAXES - CURRtNT VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE , 4 ' LUO- ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 887.000 73,916 ACCOUNTING PERIOD OL ENDING 5/31/90 887.000- 100- 41-ODO-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES 1990-91. Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO ONkEC•U 30,000- % 100 - BU OG ET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE BAL ' 39-000-00-4031 TAXES - LIBRARY SEKVICESI,bie."700 1.681,800- 134.891 INTERGOVERNMENTAL 1.616.700- 1.618,700- 100- 39-OUO-00-4037 TAXES - IMRF 213.400 18,200 2t8.400- 218.400- LUO- 39-000-OU-4038 TAXES - MAINT C REPAIR 140.700 11.715 3599707 140.700- 140,700- LUO- 39-ODU-00-4039 iAXES-INSURANCE E AUDIT 29.120 2.416 294.500 29.120- 29.t2O- LOU- TJTAL TAX REVENUE 2,OUtr.920 167,Z42 SEWER FEES 2#006.920- 2.006.920- too - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 3U7.042- 307.042- 92- 41-OUO-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES 60.000 39-000-00-4157 STATE GRANT 52.290 4.356 56,564- 52.290- 52,280- l00- 39-OBU-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 26.600 2,216 2.697 26.600- 269600- lUO- TOTAL INTERGUVLRNMENTAL REVENUE 79,880 6,572 75,000 78.880- 78.880- 100 - PARKING REVENUE 65050- 87- 41-000-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 25.000 2,033 39-000-00-4216 FINES AND FORFEITS 40.000 3.333 20.969- 40,000- 40,000- L00- 39-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 40,000 3.333 4,214 40,000- 4U,U0O- 100- 39-000-00-4254 OTHER INCOME 3811120 31.760 3811-120- 381,120- 100- TDTAL PARKING REVENUE 461,tZ0 39,426 JAWA INTEREST 461.120- 461,120- 100 - TOTAL L-I3RARY FUND 2.546.920 ZL2,Z4O t00- [,546,920- 1,546,920- LUG - WATER E SEWER FUND TAX REVENUE 41-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRtNT 7649800 63,733 76" BUD- 764,800- LUO- 41-UJO-00-4UZO TAXES - PRIOR 887.000 73,916 867,000- 887.000- 100- 41-ODO-00-4119 SEWER INSPECTION FEES 30.000 2.500 30,000- 30.000- 100 - TOTAL TAX REVENUE 1,681.800 140,149 1,681.800- 1.681,800- 100 - INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 41-UUU-00-4L57 GRANT - P M SEWER 392.400 32.700 359,707 3599707 32,693- 32,693- 8- 41-ODU-00-4201 WATER SALES 3.534,000 294.500 297.836 297.836 3,236,164- 3,236,164- 92- 41-000-00-4202 SEWER FEES 335,000 27,916 27.958 27,958 3U7.042- 307.042- 92- 41-OUO-00-4203 WATER PENALTIES 60.000 5.000 3.437 39437 56,564- 56,563- 94- 4► -000-00-4204 METER SALES 20.000 1,666 2.697 2,697 17.303- 17.303- 87- 41-OJU-00-4205 WATER E SEWER TAPS 75,000 6,250 99450 9,450 65.550- 65050- 87- 41-000-00-4206 PROSPECT MEADOWS SEWER 25.000 2,033 4,031 4,031 200969- 20.969- 84- 41-000-00-4145 REIMBURSEMENTS 19.000 833 4.214 4,214 5,786- 5.786- 58- 41-000-00-4246 JAWA INCOME 0 41-000-00-4147 JAWA INTEREST 50,000 4,166 - 50000- 509000- t00- 41-UOU-00-4248 1:,TEREST INCOME 270,OG0 ZZ#50O 49445 4.445 265,555- 265,555- 98- 4t-UOU-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS 30.UU0 2#500 Le- t8- 30,018- 30,018- 100- 4t-000-00-4Z5O BANK INTEREST INCOME 5,000 416 5,000- 5,000- 100- 41-000-00-4ZBO SALE OF PROPERTY 5.000 416 5.000- 5,OUO- IOU - 41 -000 -UO -4,189 GAIN/LOSS SALE OF ASSETS 0 4t-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVEST. 0 41-000-00-4295 DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION 0 41-UDO-00-4299 WATER CLEARING ACCOUNT O TOTAL INTERGOVERNMENTAL REVENUE 4,811.400 400.946 713.157 713.757 4.097,644- 4.097,643- 85 - TOTAL WATER E SEWER FUND 6,493.200 541,095 713,T57 7139757 5.779,444- 59779,443- 99- 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5)31190 1990-9L Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MG BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND FEE REVENUE 46 -000 -UO -4113 RENTAL - DEPOT 2,880 TJTAL FEE REVE'IUE 2,880 PARKING REVENUE 46-OUG-00-4211 METER CJLLECTION UNIT OL 82.OUO 46-000-00-4211 METER COLLECTION -UNIT 02 66,000 46-000-00-4213 SPACE RENT WILLE ST.LOT 9.000 46-000-00-4243 PARKING STUDY REIMB 46-UOU-00-4148 INTEREST INCOME 13,000 TOTAL PARKING REVENUE 172,000 TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 174,880 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENU. 48-U00-00-4176 I_VSPELTION SERVICES CHCS 12.000 48-OOU-00-4177 HUMAN SERVICES CHARGES 1,500 4870DO-00-4178 PLANNING C ZONING CHGS 1*500 48-000-00-4179 POLICE DEPT CHARGES 1311.000 48-000-00-4180 FIRE DEPARTMENT CHARGES 135,000 48-000-00-4181 STREET DIVISION CHARGES 190.000 48-000-00-4182 MATER FUND CHARGES 87.500 48-000-00-4183 DARKING FUND CHARGES 8*500 46-000-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 5,000 48-000-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT 1.500 48-000-00-4263 SALE OF P.M. EQUIPMENT 13,000 48-000-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT 10.000 T)TAL SERVICE CMARGE REVENUE 593.500 TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL FUND 593,500 ----------------------------------------- RISK MANAGEMENT FUND SERVICE CHARGE REVENUE 49-000-00-4176 GENERAL FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4177 NATER FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4178 PARKING FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-4179 LI3RARY FUND CHARGES 49-000-00-441 EMPLOYEE CONTRIeUTIUNS 49-000-00-4242 RETIREE CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4243 LIBRARY CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4244 Flt%COMP CONTRIBUTIONS 49-000-00-4Z45 REIMBURSEMENTS 49-000-00-4248 INVESTMENT INCOME 49-000-00-4249 INTEREST - GIE 49-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME PAGt 5 UNREC"U % BALANCE BALANCE BAL 240 480 480 2,400- 2,400- 83- 240 480 480 1,400- 2,400- 83- 6.833 7.061 7,061 74.939- 74,939- 91- 5.500 5*914 5.914 60,086- 60*08b- 91- 750 960 960 8,040- 8.040- 89- 8.500- 100= 416 5,000- 5,000- 0 L*250 410 410 14,590- 149590- 97- 14,333 14.345 t4,345 157,695- 157,655- 91- t4*573 14.825 14.825 160.055- 160,055- 92- 1*000 1Z*OUO- 12,000- t00- LZ5 1,500- 1.500- LGO- 125 1, 5uO- i*500- !00- 10,833 13U,OCO- 130,000- t00- 111250 135*DUO- 1359000- LOU - t5,833 190,000- 190,000- 100- 7.291 87.500- 879500- 100- 708 8,500- 8.500- 100= 416 5,000- 5,000- LOU- !0.541 2,500- 2.500- LOO - 833 10,000- 10,000- !00- 633 109000- 10,000- t00- 49,455 59).500- 593,500- too - 49v455 593.500- 593.500- too - 1.206,000 100.500 t*2ob,oUO- L,ZO6,000- luU- 199,500 16*625 199.500- 199,500- 100- 4.000 333 4.000- 4,000- 100- 61.000 5.083 61,000- 61.000- LOU- b7,OJO 5.583 5,295 5.295 61,705- 61.705- 92- 126,500 !0.541 9,732 9,732 116,768- 116,768- 91- 3u,500 2,541 30,500- 30,500- 100- 6,000 500 584 584 5,416- 5,416- 90- 25,000 2*083 2,t19 2,1L9 22,88t- 22.881- 92- 100,000 8,333 2,790 2,790 97,210- . 91,ZtO- 97- 5,500 458 59500- 5,500- 100- 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD OL ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL TITAL SERVICE CHAR(;E REVENUE 1,831,000 152,580 20,520 20,520 TOTAL RISK HANAGLMENT FUND 1,831,000 152,580 20,520 20,520 CAPITAL IMPRV. L REPL. FUND TAX REVENUE 51-000-00-4016 TAXES - CURRENT 186,400 15.533 51-000-00-4017 TAXES - PRIOR 226.000 ,18.833 TOTAL TAX REVE'4UE 412.400 34,366 INTERFUND TRANSFERS - 51-000-03-4226 TRANS - GENEBAL FUND SL -000-00-4246 1NTERe ST INCOME 45,000, 3.750 51-000-00-4262 SALE OF FIRE EQUIPMENT SL -000-00-4263 SALE OF P.N. EQUIPMENT 51-000-00-4264 SALE OF POLICE EQUIPMENT 51-UOU-00-4Z6? DEVELOPER DONATION 120,000 10.000 51-000-00-4268 i1ISTORICAL SOCIETY DONTN 3u.000 2,500 UTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 195,000 16.250 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPRV. G REPL. FUND 607.400 50,616 CORPORATE PURPOSES CONST 1990 FEE REVENUE 53-000-00-4113 .MENTAL INCOME 53-000-00-4242 SALE OF 80NDS-SERIES A 4,000,000 333,333 53-000-00-4243 SALE OF BONDS -SERIES 8 53-000-00-4248 INTERf-ST INCOME 25,000 2,083 tOTAL FEE REVENUE 4,025,000 335.416 TOTAL CORPORATe PURPOSES CONST 1990 4.025.000 335,416 ----------------------------------------- DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT CONST 1987 OTHER REVENUE 54-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL OTHER REVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1987 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST L985 FEE REVENUE 19935 1,935 1'1935 1.93S 19935 11935 UNREC•D BALANCE 1.810.4bU- 1,610,480- lab,4u0- 226,000- 412,400- 43,065- 126.000- 30,000- 193,0b5- 605.465- 4,000.000- 25,000- 4.025,000- 4,U25,000 - PAGE ' 6 E BALANCE bAL 1.8!0,480- 99- 1.8!0,480- 99- 186,400- 100- 286.000- 100- 412,400- IJO- 0 43.065- 9b- 0 G 0 120,000- 100- 3u,OUO- 100- 193.0b5- 99- 605.465- lOC- 0 4,000.000- L00- 0 25.000- 100- 4,025.000- 100- 4,025,000- LOU - 0 0 0 5S-UUO-00-4113 RENTAL INCOME 55 -000 -UO -4245 REIMBURSEMENTS 55-0DU-OU-4248 INTEREST INCOME 55-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME TJTAL FEE REVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT CONST 1985 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1990 OTHER REVENUE 56-UJU-00-4242 SALE JF PONOS 56 -000 -OU -4248 INTER' -ST INCOME TOTAL OTHER RcVENUE TOTAL DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CUNST 1990 ---------------------------------- CORPORATE PURPOSES B L 1 1973 TAX REVENUE 60-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 60-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 60-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP RtPL TAX 60-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVEAUt. TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES 3 4 1 1973 -------------------------------------- CORPORATE PURPOSES B E I L974 TAX REVENUE 61 -000 -OJ -4022 TAXES - CURRENT 61-000-00-4023 TAXES - PRIOR 6L-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 61-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVF13Ut TOTAL CORPORATE PURP,'SES 9 G I 19T4 SSA 01 PROSPECT 4tAOOWS B F I TAX REVENUE 6Z-000-00-4022 TAXES - CURRENT 62-000-00-4026 TAXES - PRIOR 62-OOU-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 1.000,000 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1,000.000- PAGE T 416 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 100- 1,005,000 83.749 ACCOUNTING PERIOD O1 ENDING 5131190 1.005,000- lOU- IV005,000 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC•D 14,700 ; BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE 8AL 13.500 1,125 1,500 1.500 IZ,OJO- 12.000- 89- 100- 10.550 879 939 939 9.611- 9.611- 0 T.50O 625 11395 1.395 6.105- 6,105- 81- 15,161 939 939 14L,011- 181,OIL- 99- 983 0 ZL,0O0 1,750 2.895 29895 18.105- 18.105- 86- 21.000 1,750 2,895 2,895 18,105- 18.105- 86- 1.000,000 83,333 1,000.000- 1,000.000- 100- 5,000 416 5,000- 5,000- 100- 1,005,000 83.749 1,005,000- 1.005,000- lOU- IV005,000 13.749 1.005,OU0- L,0U5,000- 100- 14,700 6,225 74,700- 74.700- 100- 919400 7,616 91,400- 9L,40O- 100- 51300 441 5,300- 5.300- 100- 10.550 879 939 939 9.611- 9.611- 91- 181.950 15.161 939 939 L81.O11- 181,011- 99- 181,950 15,161 939 939 14L,011- 181,OIL- 99- 111,500 9,875 118, 50U- 118.500- !00- 122.550 10,212 122.550- 122,550- lU0- 8,400 T0O 8,400- 8.400- LOO- ZU,000 1.666 1,607 1.607 18.393- 18,393- 92- 269,450 22,453 1,607 - 1,607 Z6T.843- 267,843- 99- 269,450 22,453 1,607 1.607 267.843- 2b 7.8h3- 99- 11,700 915 11.700- 11.700- lU0- 11.800 983 11.800- 11.800- 100- 3.000 250 307 301 - 2.693- 2,693- 90- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD Ol ENDING 5131/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL T]TAL TAX REVENUE 25.500 Z,208 307 307 TOTAL SSA 01 PROSPECT MEADOWS 8 E I 26,500 2,208 307 307 SSA 02 BLACKHAMK 4 E I TAX REVENUE 63 -000 -OU -4028 TAXES - CURRENT 15,000 1,250 63-000-00-4029 TAXES - PRIOR 14,500 17208 63-000-00-4248 INTERLST INCOME 3,200 266 TITAL TAX REVENUE 31,700 2,724 TOTAL SSA 62 BLACKMAWK B E I 32,700 2,724 CORPORATE PURPOSES B E 11990 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 64-OJO-00-4227 TRANS - FLOOD CGNTRUL 305,OUO 25,416 64-000-00-4228 TRANS - 1989A IMPRV 64-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 20,000 1,666 TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 325,000 27,082 TOTAL CORPORATE PURPOSES B E 11990 315.000 27,082 DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT B E I 1990 INTERFUND TRANSFERS 65-000-00-4227 Tx ANS - GENERAL FUND 65 -DUO -00-4228 TRANS - O/T CUNST 1990 45,500 4,041 TJTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 49,500 4.041 TOTAL DOWNTOWN RLDEVLPMT B E I 1990 ---------------------------------------- 48.500 4,041 INSURANCE RESERVE 8 E I TAX REVENUE 66-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 66-OJU-00-4UZU TAXES - PRIOR 66-000-00-4248 INTER�_ST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL INSURANCE RESERVE 8 E I ---------------------------- In 333 333 333 59,900 4.991 79600 .633 1,207 67,500 5,624 1,207 61,500 5,624 19201 333 333 333 1,207 I,ZOT 1.207 UNREC•D BALANCE 26.193- 26,193- IS,000- 14,500- 2.867- 32,36T- 32,367- 305,000- 20,000- 325,000- 325,000- 48.500- 4d,5U0- 48.500- 59,900- 6,393- 66,293- 66,293 - PAGE 8 X BALANCE 8AL Z6.193- 99- 26.193- 99- 15,000- LOU- 14,500- 100- Z, 867- 90:- 32,367- 0-32,367- 99- 32,367- 99- 305,000- '100- 0 20.000- 100- 325,000- 100- 325,000- L00- 0 48.500- 100- 48,500- 100- 48,500- IOU - 0 59,900- 100- "4 6.393- 84- 66,293- 98- 66, 293- 9b - P M FACILITY B C 119873 TAX REVENUE 69-000-00-40L9 TAXES -CURRENT 175.900 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 1751900- 69-000-00-4020 TAXES-PRIUR 178,750 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT 178,750- T3TAL TAX REVENUE 354,650 ACCOUNTING PERIOD Ot ENDING 5131/90 354.650- INTERFUND TRANSFERS 1940-9t Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO UNREC•0 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE DOWNTOWN REDE YLPMT B E 1 1987 2,38,9 29389 L5,tlt- 69-000-UO-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME TAX AEYENUE TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS L7,500 1,458 2,389. 2#389 68-000-00-4034 PROPERTY TAX INCREMENT 90,000 7.500 31#011 2,389 2.389 90,OU0- 68-000-00-4039 SALES TAX INCREMENT INTERFUND TRANSFERS T:)TAL TAX RLVtt4UE 9u., 000 7,500 70-000-00-4Z24 TRANS - DIT CONST 19870 90,000- INTERFUNU TRANSFERS 19.500 - TO -000-00-4225 TRANS - D/T CONST 1985 68-000-00-4224 TRANS - OJT CONST 19870 249000 2.000 56,936 56.936 32.936 68-000-00-4248 ENTER,_ST INCOME 375 31 .375- 68-000-00-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME 299500 2*458 29.500 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REUEYLPMT H E I L96TC TJTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS 2}.3T5 2,031 56.936 56,936 32.561 TOTAL DOWNTOWN REOEVLPMT B E 119870 114.375 9.531 56,936 56,936 57,439- P M FACILITY B C 119873 TAX REVENUE 69-000-00-40L9 TAXES -CURRENT 175.900 14,658 1751900- 69-000-00-4020 TAXES-PRIUR 178,750 14.895 178,750- T3TAL TAX REVENUE 354,650 29,553 354.650- INTERFUND TRANSFERS 69-QOU-UO-4227 TRANS - CIRR FUND 69-000-00-4248 I`iTERtST INCOME 17,500 1,458 2,38,9 29389 L5,tlt- 69-000-UO-4249 MISCELLANEOUS INCOME TOTAL INTERFUND TRANSFERS L7,500 1,458 2,389. 2#389 15,111 - TOTAL P M FACILITY 8 E 119878 372,150 31#011 2,389 2.389 369,76L - DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT 8 E'I 1987E INTERFUND TRANSFERS 70-000-00-4Z24 TRANS - DIT CONST 19870 29,500 2.458 19.500 - TO -000-00-4225 TRANS - D/T CONST 1985 70-000-00-4248 INTERLST INCOME 70-000-00-4249 OTHER INCOME T3TAL 1NTERFUlU TRANSFERS 299500 2*458 29.500 - TOTAL DOWNTOWN REUEYLPMT H E I L96TC 29,500 2.458 29,500 - POLICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 71-000-00-4049 TAXES - CURRENT 100,000 8,333 100,000- 71-000-00-4050 TAXES - PRIOR 2,000 166 - 2,000- 71-000-00-4164 PERSONAL PROP REPL TAX 7t-000-00-4243 PULICEMENS CONTRIBUTIONS 240,000 20,000 271220 21,220 212,780 - E PAGE 9 z BALANCE BAL 909000- Lou - 0 90,000- lUU- 32,936 137 ITS- IUD - 0 32,561 134 57.439- 50- 175,900- 100- t7d,750- 100- 354*650- 100- 0 15.111- d6 - U 15.111- 86- 369,761- 99- 29,500- LOO - 0 G 0 29,500- IOU- 29.500- IUU- 1009000- 100- 2,000- i0G- 0 212,780- 89- 13 PAGE ' 10 x BALANCE UAL 19302,162- 100- 0 5,000- 100- 0 1,6219942- 98- 1r6Zir942 48- 50,000- L00- 19000- !00- 205.536- 89- L.46J.U36- LUO- 0 5.000- IUU- 0 1,724.572- 96- 1,724.572- 98- 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD OL ENDING 5/31190 19,40-91 Y-T-O Y-T-D CUR MO UNREC•O Bt3DGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE POLICE PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 7t-000-00-4248 INTER: ST INCOME 1,305,000 108.750 2.838 2.838 1,302,L62- 7L-OOU-00-4249 JTHER 71-000-00-4250 BANK INTEREST INCOME x,000 416 5.000- 7L-000-00-4Z90 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMF TJTAL TAX REVENUE 1,652,000 137.665 30.058 30.058 L,621.942- TOTAL POLICE PENSION FUND ----------------------- L,b529000 - 137,665 30,058 30,058 1,621,942- FIREMENIS PENSION FUND TAX REVENUE 72-000-OU-4052 TAXES - CURRENT 50,000 4,166 5u,000- 72-000-00-4U53 TAXES-PRIOR 1,000 83 1.000- 72-UJU-OU-4243 ftREM_:N•S CONTRIBUTIONS 232.000 19,333 26.464 26.464 ZU5,536- 72-000-00-4[48 INTER _ST INCOME 1.465,000 122,U83 1.964 1,964 L,463,036- 72-000-00-4249 OTHER 72-OOU-00-4250 SANK INTEREST INCOME 51000 416 S,000- 72-000-00-4290 GAIN ON SALE OF INVESTMT TJTAL TAX REVENUE L,753,000 146.081 28,428 28.428 1.724.572- TOTAL FIREMEW S PENSION FUND ----------------'-----------------------'--- 1.753.000 146.081 28.428 289428 10249572- SSA 03 BUSSE-WILLE 8 G I TAX REVENUE 88-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 88-000-00-40ZO TAXES - PRIOR 88-000-00-4248 INrER-ST INCOME TOTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL SSA 03 BUSSE-WILLE 8 E I ------------------------------------------ SSA :4 BUSSE-WILLE 8 E I TAX REVENUE - 89-000-00-4019 TAXES - CURRENT 89-000-00-4020 TAXES - PRIOR 89-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 7 7 7 TOTAL TAX REVENUE 7 7 7 TOTAL SSA 04 BUSSE-WILLE B E I 7 7 7 13 PAGE ' 10 x BALANCE UAL 19302,162- 100- 0 5,000- 100- 0 1,6219942- 98- 1r6Zir942 48- 50,000- L00- 19000- !00- 205.536- 89- L.46J.U36- LUO- 0 5.000- IUU- 0 1,724.572- 96- 1,724.572- 98- 0 0 0 0 0 C 0 7 0 7 0 7 0 SSA 86 GEORGE/ALBERT B C I TAXREVENUE 94-OUO-00-4019 TAXES - CURRANT 94-000-00-4020 TAXES -PRIOR 94-000-00-4248 INTEREST INCOME 94-000-00-4249 JTHER INCOME TJTAL TAX REVENUE TOTAL.SSA iib GEORGE/ALBERT 8 C I -------------------------------- FLOOD LOAN D C I INTERFUND TRANSFERS 95-000-00-4227 TRANSFER GENERAL FUND T:JTAL INTERFUNO TRANSFERS TOTAL FLOOD LOAN 8 C I ------------------------------------- TOTAL ALL FUNDS D 34.48T.950 29341,814 39TOT.ZTL 2,3419814 32,1469139- 0 0 0 122- 4291469136- VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11 ESTIMATED REVENUE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNREC•0 X BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE BALANCE DAL 16,200 1#350 16,200- 16.200- !00- 16,000 1.333 16.000- 169000- 100- 800 66 195 195 605- 605- 76- 0 339000 2.749 195 195 32.805- 32005- 99- 33.000 2.749 195 195 32.8U5- 32,805- 99- 34.48T.950 29341,814 39TOT.ZTL 2,3419814 32,1469139- 0 0 0 122- 4291469136- 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD O1 ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR PIC UNEXPENDED UNENCUM >S BUDGET. ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE SAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 17x500 1,458 1.501 19501 L6#000 15,999 91 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 39.000 3.249 18.081 18.081 20,919 20.919 54 TOTAL COMMODITIES 4,000 333 194 194 3.606 31806 95 TOTAL MAYOR AND BUARU OF TRUSTEES 60,500 5,040 19.776 19.776 40,7Z5 40x724 67 ADVISORY BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVI-CES 2,500 2Q8 75 75 2.425 29425 97 TOTAL COMMODITIES 250 20 250 250 100 TOTAL ADVISORY HOARDS AND COMMISSI 2,750 228 75 75 2.675 2,675 97 TOTAL PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION 63.250 59268 19,851 19.851 43,400 439399 69 VILLAGE MANAGER -S OFFICE ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT - TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 168,430 14,033 14.245 14#245 154.185 154.185 92 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 17,050 1,419 210 210 16,840 16,840 99 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,800 150 90 90 1.710 10710 95 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1*000 83 1.000 1.000 t00 TUTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 188.280 15x685 14.545 149545 t73, 135 173.735 92 LEGAL SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 140,000 11.666 2,039 2.039 137,961 1379961 99 TOTAL LEGAL SERVICES 14,19000 11,666 29039 29039 1379961 1379961 99 PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT E TRAINING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 47,020 3,918 819 819 46.201 46.201 98 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 33,300 2#771 856 656 32,444 32#444 97 TOTAL COMMOOLTIES 950 78 149 t49 801 801 84 TOTAL PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT 6 TRAIN 81.270 6.767 1, 8ZA 1#824 79.446 T9.446 98 SALARY ADMINISTRATION .TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 10,000 833 10.000 10,000 100 ' TOTAL SALARY ADMINISTRATION 10,000 833 10,060 109000 100 TOTAL VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE ----------------------------------------- 419,550 34,951 18.408 189408 401,142 401.142 96 CABLE TV OPERATIONS - CABLE TV OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 839420 6,950 7.205 7.205 769Z15 76.215 91 TOTAL CONTRA=TUAL SERVICES 27.210 2.265 7,961 7#961 199Z49 t 19,248 71 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11#140 953 52 52 111388 11,388 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9.500 791 9,500 90500 t00 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 139400 1,116 139400 13,400 100 TOTAL Wqt.� TV OPERATLONS 144,970 12,075 15,218 15#218 129.752 I 129,751 90 TOTAL CABLE TV OP.RATIONS ------------------------------------------ 144#970 12.075 15,218 15.Zt8 t29, T52 1 129.751 9C FINANCE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 0 0 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGED 9UDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD O1 ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -O CUR MO UNEXPENDED UN£NCUM ; FINANCE DEPARTMENT BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES TOTAL 72.920 6.075 6.582 60582 66.338 669338 91 CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL COMMODITIES 64.600 5.380 385 385 64•[15 6 64.209 99 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 6,500 2.000 541 166 603 603 5,398 5.897 91 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 146,OZ0 LZ, 162 7.570 7.570 2.000 2.000 L00 138.451 6 138.444 95 ACCOUNTING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 8U♦TZ5 6.725 10.283 10.283 70.443 70.442 87 TOTAL CONTRA::TUAL SERVICES 3.550 295 239 239 3.311 3.311 93 TOTAL COMMODITIES 750 62 TOTAL ACCOUNTING 35.025 7tO82 10.522 10#522 750 74.504 ISO 74.503 100 8N PURCHASING ' TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 21.800 1.816 2.473 2.473 19,327 19932,7 89 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 600 50 600 600 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1.900 158 1.9001.900 LOG TOTAL PURCHASING 24.300 2.024 2,473 2.473 21,827 . Z1,82T 90 ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 73.050 6,085 7.771 T.771 65.279 65.279 89 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19,400 1,616 1.280 1.280 10.120 18.120 93 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6.000 500 67 67 5,933 5,933 99 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4,500 315 4,500 4.500 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 100 TOTAL ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING 102.950 8,5T6 9,118 9,118 93.832 93,832 0 91 DUPLICATING SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,000 2.083 2.960 2.960 22,040 22.040 88 TOTAL COMMODITIES T.500 625 7,500 71500 100 TOTAL DUPLICATING SERVICES 32,500 2,708 2.960 2,960 29.540 29.540 91 TELEPHONE SERVICE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 'TOTAL 20,625 1.718 2,524 2,524 189101 18.101 Be CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 41.500 3.958 2,415 29415 45,085 45.085 95 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.500 125 1.500 1.500 100 TOTAL TELEPHONE SLRVICE 69,625 5.801 4.939 40939 64.686 64.686 93 INSURANCE TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3U9135 2,510 3.446 3.446 26.689 261689 89 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 465,000 389749 465,000 465.000 100 TOTAL INSURANCE 495,L35 .IIZ59 3,446 39446 4919b99 491.689 99 CUSTOMER SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 93.060 7.752 1L,120 11.120 61,941 81,940 88 TOTAL CONTRA_TUAL SERVICES 32,500 2.708 11002 1,602 310#98 31.498 97 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8,000 665 151 151 7,849 7,849 98 TOTAL CUSTOMER SERVICES 133,5bO II,LZS 12.273 12.273 121.288 121.287 91 CASH MANAGEMENT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 23.610 11966 1,865 1.865 21.745 21.745 9Z TOTAL CASH MANA,EMENT 23,610 1,966 1.865 1.865 21.745 21.745 92 0 13 PAGE14 UNEXPENDED VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT 500 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 t00 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO 500 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT 1.058,053 95 54.833 NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURES 89 31,307 31.307 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 500 41 4.867 97 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 2 919007 91 45,500 TOTAL NON -DEPARTMENTAL EXPENDITURE 500 41 29500 TOTAL FINANCE DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------- 1,1139225 92,744 55.166 55.166 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE 139.009 2 139,007 95 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 41 1,615,303 93 1,618,344 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 61,445 5,118 6.612 6,612 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 32,250 2,685 943 943 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,000 416 131 131 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 98,695 8,219 7,686 7,686 VILLAGE NEWSLETTER 500 LOO 405,312 b TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 45,500 3,791 262,789 TOTAL COMMODITIES 2,500 208 710810 LOU TOTAL VILLAGE NcWSLETTER 48,000 3,999 98 4.000 TOTAL VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ----------------------------------------- 145,695 12,218 7,686 7,686 RISK MANAGEMENT 92 750,263 6 7509257 RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 406,166 4069166 88 TOTAL CONTRA=TUAL SERVICES 1,741,OU0 145,090 122,656 122,656 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT PROGRAM 1,741,0,30 145,080 122,656 122.656 TOTAL RISK MANAGEMENT ----------------------------------------- 1,741,000 145,080 122.656 122,656 INSPECTION SERVICES INSPECTION SERVICES .7UTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 361,390 30,111 39,503 39,503 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 76,000 6,328 1.135 10135 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8,300 689 240 240 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 500 41 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 446.190 37,tb9 40,878 40,878 ENGINEERING SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 293,600 Z4,463 30,811 309811 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES T1,900 5,987 90 _ 90 TOTAL COMMOUITIES 6,500 541 148 148 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.000 333 TOTAL ENGINEERING SERVICES 376,000 31,324 31,049 31,049 TOTAL INSPECTION SERVICES 822,190 609493 71,927 719921 POLICE DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 460#755 38.390 54,589 540589 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 148,950 12,409 8,158 6,158 13 PAGE14 UNEXPENDED - UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 500 500 t00 0 500 500 t00 19058.Ub2 6 1.058,053 95 54.833 54#833 89 31,307 31.307 97 4,869 2 4.867 97 9t.OU9 2 919007 91 45,500 45,500 100 29500 2,500 100 48,000 48,000 100 139.009 2 139,007 95 1,61,1,344 41 1,615,303 93 1,618,344 41 1.618003 93 1,618,344 41 t,618,303 93 321,887 321,887 89 74.865 6 74,859 98 8.060 8,060 97 500 500 LOO 405,312 b 405.306 91 262.789 262,789 90 719810 710810 LOU 6.352 6,352 98 4.000 4,000 100 344,951 344,951 92 750,263 6 7509257 91 406,166 4069166 88 140,793 140,792 95 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 1940-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL POLICE DEPARTMENT 9.869 99869 96 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 4.000 4.000 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES 10'250 854 381 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.000 333 88 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 623.955 51.986 63.128 PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMENT 28*102 Ze,t01 96 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2.565.355 213.774 299,810 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 274.590 ZZ,88t 66,588 TOTAL COMMODITIES 29.250 2'435 1.149 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 5.000 416 99 TOTAL PATROL AND TRAFFIC ENFORCEMEZ,574,195 239.506 367.547 CRIME PREV., PUBLIC AND YOUTH SERV. 15,560 117,811 $ 117.810 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1159290 9.605 15,118 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14,500 1.207 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES 3.600 299 362 TOTAL CRIM+': PREY., PUBLIC AND YOUT 133,390 !1'111 15,580 INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE PROGRAM 89 6,385 41.615 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 533,555 44,457 65,372 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 42,200 3,516 599 TOTAL COMMODITIES 2,000 166 43 - TOTAL INVESTIGATIVE AND JUVENILE P 577.755 48,139 66,014 CR9SSING GUARDS 99 5.642 118,358 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 44,000 4,000 6.385 TOTAL COMMODITIES 500 41 375,037 TOTAL CROSSING GUARDS 48'500 4,041 6,385 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS 89 Z61660 257.365 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 52,870 4.404 4,923 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 199,250 16,602 1,300 TOTAL COMMODITIES 124,000 10,332 5.642 .TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 13,200 1.098 2,420 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPER 389,320 32,436 14,285 TOTAL POLICE DEPARTMENT ------------------------------------------ 4,647,115 367,219 532,939 FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 230,917 99 461 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 11#299 96 456 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 284#OZ5 23.664 26,660 TOTAL CONTRA-TUAL SERVICES 49,450 4#117 631 TOTAL COMMODITIES 32,800 2,733 It - TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1-j'290 1'274 TOZ . TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 381.565 31,788 28,182 FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,765,135 230,422 311,385 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES Z33,340 19,443 2,423 TOTAL COMMOUITIES 1!#760 978 461 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 84#370 7.02T 456 TOTAL FIRE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONS 3,094#605 2579870 314,725 PAGE 15 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE EtiCUMBCRED BALANCE BAL 381 9.869 99869 96 4.000 4.000 100 63.128 560.828 560.BZ7 90 199.810 2,265.545 2.265.545 88 66.588 208,002 208,002 76 1.149 28*102 Ze,t01 96 59000 5.000 100 367,547 2,506,649 29506#648 87 15.118 100,172 - 1009172 87 100 14,400 14,400 99 362 3,239 3#238 90 15,560 117,811 $ 117.810 88 65.372 468,133 468,183 Be 599 41.601 41,601 99 43 1#958 1,957 98 66,014 511#742 511,741 89 6,385 41.615 41.615 87 500 500 100 61,385 42.115 42,115 8T 49923 47,949 47,947 91 1,300 1979950 197050 99 5.642 118,358 118.358 95 2,420 10#TBO 10.780 62 14.285 375,037 375,035 96 532#939 4#114#182 4.1149176 89 Z61660 257.365 257,365 91 631 48.619 48#619 96 11- 32,811 1 329810 100 702 14.588 14#568 95 281t81 353#383 1 353#382 93 311,385 2,453975t 2,453.750 89 2,423 230#917 230,917 99 461 11,299 11#299 96 456 83,914 83.914 99 314,725 2,7791881 2,779,860 90 C PAGE 16 UNEXPENDED VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT 200,717 ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 87 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO - BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL FIRE 6 EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. 2,079 98 245,731 7 FIRE PREVENTION 89 34,016 34,015 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2299405 19,112 28,689 28,689 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 37,600 39131 99 99 TOTAL COMMODITIES x.715 473 288 288 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20115 175 29 29 TOTAL FIRE PREVENTION 274,835 22,891 29,105 299105 COMMUNICATIONS 0 263,264 TOTAL CUNTRACTUAL SERVICES 360000 2,999 1,985 1,985 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 9,825 818 3,553 TOTAL COMMUNICATTUNS 45.825 3.817 1,985 1,985 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS 27 7,328 98 149406 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 629240 59186 70128 7,126 TOTAL CONTRAZTUAL SERVICES 156.630 13,052 283,OU2 TOTAL COMMODITIES 46.000 3,832 1.748 1.748 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.270 605 83 86,723 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 86,723 89 Z9,914 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE L OPER 272.140 22,675 8.676 8.876 EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS 1.5UC 1.500 t00 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,000 250 346 346 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5.560 Z95 7 7 TOTAL COMMODITIES 910 75 66 66 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 7.505 624 150 150 TOTAL EMERGENCY PREPARFONESS 14.975 1.244 569 569 TOTAL FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT. ----------------------------------------- 4.0830945 340,235 383.442 383.442 CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE POLICE 6 FIRE DISPATCH SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SSRVICES 339.600 28.300 56.598 56.598 • TOTAL POLICE C FIRE DISPATCH SERVI 339.600 28,300 56,598 56,598 TOTAL CENTRAL OISPATCH SERVICE ----------------------------------------- 339.600 28.300 56,598 56,598 HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION INFORMATION, REFERRAL, E COUNSELING TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 97,480 8,1Z0 10.757 10.757 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 30.770 2,562 856 856 TOTAL COMMOUITIES 4,550 378 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,500 125 TOTAL INFU'1MATI0N. REFERRAL, E LOU 134.300 11.195 11,613 11.613 RECREATION AND EDUCATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 14.120 1.225 1,686 1,686 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICFS 2.315 192 88 88 TOTAL RECREATION AND EDUCATION 17.035 1.417 1.774 1.714 HOMEBOUND SERVICES TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 5J,7Z5 4.225 5,825 5,825 C PAGE 16 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 200,717 200,716 87 3T,501 37.501 100 5,427 5,427 95 2,086 7 2,079 98 245,731 7 245,723 89 34,016 34,015 94 9.825 3 99822 100 43,84t 3 43,837 96 55,112 559112 89 156,630 t56,630 100 449252 44,252 96 7,270 . 7,270 LOO 0 263,264 263,264 97 2,654 2,654 88 3,553 3,553 100 844 844 93 71355 27 7,328 98 149406 27 149379 96 3.700.506 36 3.700,465 91 283,002 283,OU2 83 283,002 283,002 83 283,OOZ 283,002 83 86,723 86,723 89 Z9,914 19,914 97 4.550 4,550 100 1.5UC 1.500 t00 122.687 1229687 91 13,034 13.034 89 2,227 2,227 96 15.261 L5926I 90 44,900 44,900 89 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 1910-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET- ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 15,246 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 1169064 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES HOMEBOUND SERVICES TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,250 TOTAL COMMODITIES 59050 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.150 1.262 699 699 TOTAL HOMEBOUND SERVICES 65.875 5,487 6,524 6,524 COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES 20,000 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 86.515 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 36,355 39194 3,844 3:844 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19650 136 92 92 TOTAL COMMUNITY ACTIVITIES 409005 39330 3,936 3,936 BLOOD DONOR PROGRAM 750 TOTAL CD8& ADMINISTRATION 429925 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS , TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,805 233 234 Z34 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 82,161 8Z,L61 95 1.149 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,450 120 116- 116 - TOTAL OLOUD DONOR PROGRAM 4,255 353 118 118 SOCIAL AGENCIES 1,149 2,478 2.478 11,322 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,500 1.708 3,280 3,260 TOTAL SOCIAL AGENCIES 20,500 1,708 966 818 TOTAL HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION 281.970 23,480 23.965 23,965 -------------------------------------- PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT 15,246 ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 1169064 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 13L.310 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 25,250 TOTAL COMMODITIES 59050 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,000 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING 162,610 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 4,630 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 511165 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 15.350 .TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20,000 TOTAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT 86.515 DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF 16,047 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 13,800 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90 TOTAL OOWNTUWN REDEVELOPMENT -TIF 13,800 CDBG ADMINISTRATION 47,311 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 29,600 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 11,625 TOTAL COMMODITIES 950 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPtNOITURES 750 TOTAL CD8& ADMINISTRATION 429925 CDBG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS , 20,000 - TOTAL CONTRA:TUAL SERVICES bt,900 TOTAL CUDG COMMUNITY PROGRAMS 61,900 m PAGE 17 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM E BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 14.451 14,451 95 59,351 59051 90 34,511 349511 90 1,558 19556 94 36,069 36,069 90 2.571 2.571 92 0 1,566 19566 108 4,137 4.137 97 20,500 �Z05 20.295 99 20,500 205 ZOV295 99 258.005 Z05 2579800 91 10.940 15,246 15,246 1169064 116,064 88 2,102 381 381 24,869 240869 98 419 420 4ZO 4,630 49630 92 83 1,000 1.000 100 13,544 16,047 16,047 146,563 146,563 90 4,261 3.854 3,854 47,311 47,311 92 1.278 500 500 14,850 - 14.850 97 1,6b6 20,000 - 209000 100 7,205 4,354 49354 82,161 8Z,L61 95 1.149 2,478 29478 11,322 119322 82 0 1,149 2,478 2.478 11,322 111322 82 2.465 3,280 3,260 26,320 26,320 89 966 818 818 !0,807 10.801 93 78 950 950 100 62 750 T50 Lou 3.571 4,098 4.098 38,827 389821 90 5,157 550 550 61,350 61,350 99 5,157 550 550 .61,350 61.350 99 ' VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE '18 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO UNEXPENDEO UNENCUM ; BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE 3AL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT CUBG ACCESSIBILITY E NEIGHBORHOOD IMPRVM TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 309.000 25.749 66 66 308,934 308.934 lOC TOTAL C06G ACCESSIRILITY E NEIGHBU 3099000 25.749 66 66 308.934 308.934 100 COSG RESIDENTIAL REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,400 -283 Zb8 268 3.132 39132 92 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 100.000 8.333 157 IST 99,843 999843 L00 TOTAL CDBG RESIUENTIAL REHABILITAT IU3.400 8.616 425 425 102,975 102.975 100 CDDG COMMERCIAL REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 7.500 625 466 466 7.034 79034 94 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5.000 416 5,000 5,000 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES LJ,000 1,666 20.000 20,000 IOU TOTAL CO3G COMMERCIAL REHABILITATI 32.500 2,707 466 466 32,034 32.034 99 COBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 56 56 56- 56- 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 40,000 39333 40.000 i 40.000 100 TOTAL CDBG MULTI -FAMILY REHABILITA 4'1.000 3.333 56 56 39,944 39.944 100 CD3G DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 0 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES G TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 0 TOTAL CDBG DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENTS 0 TOTAL PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT --------------------------------------- 852,650 71,031 28,540 28,540 824,110 824.110 97 STREET DIVISION ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT - TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 20'..585 17.210 201578 209578 186.007 18b.007 90 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 104,500 89706 787 787 103.713 103,713 99 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1410UO 1,166 2.262 2,262 11.738 11.738 84 'TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.500 208 1,400 1.400 1,100 1.100 44 TUTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 327.545 27,290 25,027 259027 .302,558 302,558 92 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES ZOI�.820 16,733 21,941 21.941 178,860 178.879 89 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SzRVICES 8T,50O 7,289 77 7? 87,423 670423 100 TOTAL COMMObITIES 86,300 7.188 3.345 3045 82.956 2L 82,934 96 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 39,500 3,290 39.500 39.500 100 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE - O TOTAL MAINTt NANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDI 414.120 349500 25.363 25,363 388,759 2I 388.736 94 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 126.455 10,537 17.054 17,054 109,401 109,401 87 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 279500 2,291 4,200 40200 23,300 23,300 85 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6.950 577 615 615 6.335 6,335 91 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.200 349 - 4.200 4 4,196 100 TOTAL MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 165.105 13054 Z1.869 21,869 143.236 4 143.232 87 0 0 PAGE 19 UNEXPENDED VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BALANCE ENCUMBERED BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT UAL _ ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 ' 1990-91 Y-T-D Y-T-D CUR NO 36.600 BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL STREET DIVISION 10829514 99 2,226,057 1L,229 STREET MAINTEMANCE 99 919104 91,104 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 88,325 7,358 8,255 8.255 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 118,300 9,857 LOO 20.000 TOTAL COMMODITIES 36,600 3.048 ZU3,104 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1,993,250 166.102 164 L64 TUTx' 1 r *SINTENANCE Z. 23S x475 186.365 8,419 6,419 SNOW RE--mi-1-.'--. 149300 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 95971(3 7,974 4,606 4,606 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1.000 582 40,800 TOTAL COMMODITIES 85.000 7,082 93.U50 99 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 20.000 1,666 100 148,500 TOTAL SNOW REMOVAL 207,710 17,304 4,606 4,606 LEAF REMOVAL 91 226,086 226.086 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 71.840 5,966 Sol 501 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 20,000 1,666 0 415,001 TOTAL COMMODITIES 14,300 1.190 36,557 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 81 22,990 - - 22,989 TOTAL LEAF REMOVAL 106,140 8.842 501 .501 STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTENANCE 61,396 87 3094T5 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 47,050 3,920 6.Z50 6.250 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL StRVILES 93,850 7,819 9:300 TOTAL COMMODITIES 130850 1,153 12,012 96 TOTAL STORM SEWER AND BASIN MAINTE 154,750 121892 6,250 61250 FORESTRY 9,992 89 21,800 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 199,760 16,644 17.771 17.771 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 226,150 18,851 164 164 TOTAL COMMODITIES 8.600 715 1,674 1.674 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL FORESTRY 43,,610 36.210 19.609 19.609 TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE ' TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 44,970 3.747 8.414 8.414 TOTAL COMMOOITIES 23.700 1,973 711 711 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.000 166 149' 149 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGN MAINTENANCE 70x670 5,886 9,214 9,274 PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 36,385 3.030 5.910 5.910 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10,000 833 TOTAL COMMODITIES 9,300 775 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 12.500 1,041 488 488 TOTAL PUBLIC GROUNDS BEAUTIFICATIU 68,185 5.619 6,398 b,396 MAINTENANCE OF STAT- HIGHWAYS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 11,165 930 1,173 19173 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES - 21,830 1,815 TOTAL COMMODITIES 28.000 2,331 TOTAL MAINTENANCF OF STATE HIGHWAY 601965 5.076 1,173 1,173 0 PAGE 19 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE UAL 80.071 80,070 91 118.300 657 1179643 99 36.600 36,600 100 L,993,086 10,572 10829514 99 2,226,057 1L,229 2,216.827 99 919104 91,104 95 7,000 7,000 100 85.000 85.000 LOO 20.000 209000 loo ZU3,104 203,104 98 719339 71,339 99 209000 20,000 loo 14,300 149300 100 0 105,639 105,639 100 409800 40,800 87 93,850 800 93.U50 99 13,d50 13,850 100 148,500 800 147,700 95 181.989 1819989 91 226,086 226.086 100 6,926 T 6,919 80 0 415,001 7 414,994 95 36,557 36,556 81 22,990 - - 22,989 97 19851 L,851 93 61,398 61,396 87 3094T5 30,475 84 10,000 lO,Ooo 100 9,300 9:300 LOC L2, 012 12,012 96 61,787 61,787 91 9,992 9,992 89 21,800 21.800 100 28,000 28.000 100 59,792 59,792 96 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31190 1930-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL STREET DIVISION UNENCUM $ EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 113#405 9,489 10,449 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1954000 16,249 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES 130#500 10.873 6,742 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.500 374 - TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE 443#905 36,985 17.191 POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 6.084 89 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES b,835 568 751 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 5.500 457 96 TOTAL COMMODITIES 129000 999 512 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.500 125 95 TOTAL POOL VEHICLE MAINTENANCE 25.835 2,L49 1.263 TRAFFIC SIGNALS E STREET LIGHTING 246.000 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES b,115 509 t00 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 24b,000 20.499 t00 TOTAL COMMODITIES 6.000 500 100 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 185.000 15.415 97 TOTAL TRAFFIC SIGNALS E STREET LIG 443,115 36,923 89 TOTAL STREET DIVISION ----------------------------------------- 5,159,170 429.855 146,943 WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 23,098 91 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 29500 100 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2310585 19,293 25,448 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 667,600 55.627 23.532 TOTAL COMMODITIES 25.500 2.123 2.402 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 2.500 208 100 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 590.530 49.200 98 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 1.517,715 126,459 51.382 MAINTENANCE OF PUBLIC BUILDINGS 70.340 95 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 43,810 3.650 3#733 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 13,500 1,123 t00 TOTAL COMMODITIES 14.500 1,207 237 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 1.500 207 86 TOTAL MAINTLNANLE OF PUBLIC BUILDS 14,310 67187 3,970 MAINTENANCE OF GROUNDS 3 103,832 100 TUTAL PERS7NAL SERVICES 35,135 3,008 3.020 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5,400 450 0 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3.700 308 3.472 TOTAL MAINTtNANCE OF GROUNDS 45.235 3,766 6,492 WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE E REPAIR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES lbt,535 13.460 15,359 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 104.000 8,666 L65 TOTAL COMMOUITIES 20.500 1,708 167 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES TOTAL WATER SUPPLY MAINTENANCE E R 286.035 23.834 15,691 10,449 6.742 17,191 751 512 1,263 146,943 25.448 23,532 2,402 51.382 3,733 237 3,970 3,020 3,472 6.492 15,359 t65 167 15.691 PAGt 20 UNEXPENDED UNENCUM $ BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 103,456 103,456 91 195,000 195,000 100 123058 123.758 95 4,500 4,500 100 426.714 426,714 96 6,084 6.084 89 5,500 50 59450 99 11,488 2 11,486 96 1,500 1,500 100 24.572 52 24.520 95 6.115 6,115 100 246.000 246.000 100 6,000 6,000 t00 1851000 185.000 t00 443.115 443,115 100 5.012,232 12,113 5,000.114 97 Z06.137 206,137 89 644,068 644,068 96 23,098 23,098 91 2.5UO 29500 100 590.530 590.530 too 1,466.333 1,466,333 97 40.077 40,077 91 t3.500 139500 100 14.263 14.263 98 2.500 2,500 100 70.340 70.340 95 33,115 33,115 92 5,400 5,400 t00 228 2 226 b 38.743 2 38.741 86 li6.L76 146.176 90 103,835 3 103,832 100 20,333 20.333 99 0 2TO,344 3 270.341 95 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y -T -O Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTHAI WATE,( AND SEWER DIVISION WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. 6 REPR. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 145.580 12x130 4#818 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 43.950 3,661. 9,9L4 TOTAL COMMODITIES 43,950 4,162 2.101 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 107.500 8,957 28 - TOTAL WATER DISTRIBUTION MAINT. E 34`.980 28,910 16,8U5 WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAINT. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 80,045 7,336 ZI.ZI1 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 19250 103 TOTAL COMMODITIES 36,550 39045 452 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES LxJ9000 833 TOTAL WATER VALVE AND HYDRANT MAIN 135,845 11,317 219663 WATER METER INSTAL.REPR.6 REPL. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 769695 6.390 71553 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 379000 3#Ud2 TOTAL COMMODITIES 849600 7,048 145 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 25.000 2.083 TOTAL WATER MET --R INSTAL.REPR.t RE 223,295 18,603 7.698 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE E OPERATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 13J,115 10,839 11,949 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 90,SOU 7,54t 32 TOTAL COMMODITIES 99,700 8.307 2,238 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 3.000 250 TOTAL EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE I. OPER 323,315 26.937 14.219 SAVLTARY SEWER MAINT. L REPAIR TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 7J#040 5,835 8.905 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 189950 1.578 TOTAL COMMODITIES 11.000 916 163 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES bt,000 5.082 TOTAL SANITARY SEWEk MAINT. 6 REPA 16J,990 13.411 9.068 WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENUITURES 444,000 36,999 68,160 TOTAL WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS 444,000 36,999 68,160 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 3,000 250 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES TOTAL CAPITAL EXP==-NDITURES 1J5,000 8,750 TOTAL SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS 108,000 9.000 LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACQUISITION TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES Z.750 228 TOTAL CONTRA--TUAL SERVICES 3.031,000 252,916 107,321 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 8,000 666 TOTAL LAKE MICHIGAN WATER ACJUISIT3,045.750 253,810 107,321 TOTAL WATER AND SEWER DIVISION 6,71194TO 559,233 3ZZ,469 4,818 9,914 2.101 28- 16,805 21,211 452 21,663 7,553 145 7,698 11.949 32 Z.2 38 14,219 8,905 163 99068 68,160 68.160 107.3Z1 107.321 322.469 PAGE 21 UNEXPENDEC UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE dAL 140, T62 34.036 47. 849 107,528 330,175 66,835 1.250 36.098 10.000 114,183 69. 14Z 37.000 84.455 25.000 Z15, 597 118,166 90.468 97,462 3,000 3U9.096 61,155 18,950 10,d3T 6t,0UU 151.922 375,840 375,840 3.000 105,000 IUB,JUU 2,750 2,927,679 8,000 2.938,429 6,389,002 140.762 97 12 34#024 T7 Z5 47.824 96 107.528 L00 37 330#138 95 66.834 76 1.250 100 36,098 99 10.000 100 II49IRZ d4 69,142 90 355 36,645 99 TOO 83055 99 25.000 loo 1,055 214.542 96 118,166 91 90,468 Lou 97,462 96 3.000 LOU 309.096 96 61.135 07 18.950 100 10,837 99 61.000 100 151.922 94 195 375,645 85 I95 375,645 85 3.000 loo 0 105.000 Loo 106.000 loo 29750 100 2.927.679 96 8.000 Loo 2,938.429 96 1,292 6.387,709 95 3' VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31190 •+"� 1990-91 Y -T -D Y -T -D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL ----------------------------------------- PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION 1.905 10.420 ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPORT 85 380 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 12.325 1.021 TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 421850 39565 TOTAL COMMODITIES ' 17.818 0 TOTAL ADMINISTRATION AND SUPPURT 55.175 4,59E PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 96 210 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 4.370 364 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 10.200 849 TOTAL COMMODITIES 5.800 482 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 132.000 10,998 TOTAL PARKING LOT MAINTENANCE 152.370 12.693 TOTAL PARKING SYSTEM 3IVISION ---------------------------------------- ZG7.545 17,289 ENGINEERING DIVISI13N 382 382 PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING 1.200 150.786 99 TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2.667 2049878 TOTAL PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PLANNING 98 4.UZ5,000 TOTAL ENGINEERING DIVISION ------------------------------------------ 4.025.000 1.00 REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION 4.0Z5.000 SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 49025.000 l0U TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 1q.250 1.601 TUTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 21091.000 174,248 TOTAL COMMODITIES 112,500 9,373 TOTAL SOLID WASTE DISPOSAL 2,221.750 185.223 TOTAL REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISIUN ---------------------------------------- 2,222.750 185.223 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS 0 DOWNTOWN REOEVELUPMENT CONSTRUCTION - 229,500 TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 993,735 N2.809 TOTAL DEBT SERVIC= EXPENSE 102,000 8,499 TOTAL OOWNTOWN RE DEVE LUPME NT CONST1.095,735 /1,308 FLOOD CONTROL PROJECTS TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 4.025.000 335.416 TOTAL FLUUJ CONTROL PROJECTS 4.025,000 335,416 COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 12,000 1,000 TUTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 220.000 18,333 TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL COMMUNITY IMPROVEMENTS 232.000 19,333 F PAGE 22 UNEXPFNDEO UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 1.905 1.905 10.420 10.420 85 380 380 42,4T0 42.470 99 2.0721949 99 179818 17.818 0 2.285 2.285 52.890 52.890 96 210 210 4.160 4.160 95 37.650 2,185,100 10.200 10.200 Lou 172 172 5.b28 5.628 97 I00 56,936 132.000 1.200 130.800 99 382 382 151,988 1.200 150.786 99 2,667 2.667 2049878 1,200 203,676 98 0 0 0 2,590 2.590 16,660 16.660 8.7 17.242 17.242 2.073,758 809 2.0721949 99 179818 17.818 94.632 27 94,655 84 37.650 37,650 2,185.100 836 1.184.264 98 31,650 37.650 2,185,100 836 2,184.264 98 993.735 993.735 I00 56,936 56,936 45,064 45.064 44 56,936 56,936. 1.03d,799 1.038,799 95 4.UZ5,000 4.025.000 1.00 4.0Z5.000 49025.000 l0U LZ,OuO 12.000 100 2.500 2.500 21T.500 333 217,167 99 0 2,SU0 29500 229,500 333 129.167 99 3 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ., PAGE 23 BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD 01 ENDING 5/31/90 l9)0-91 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO UNEXPENDED UNENCUM % BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS GENERAL EQUIP G IMPRVMNTS TOTAL CAPITAL LXPENOITURES 150,OOD 127500 150.000 L5U.000 LOU TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 3051000 Z5,416 305,000 305.000 LUG TOTAL GENERAL EJUIP E IMPRVMNTS 455,OU0 37.916 455.000 455.000 100 MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL TOTAL CAPITAL EXPENDITURES 469.200 39.096 469.200 621 468078 100 TOTAL MOTOR EQUIPMENT POOL 469.200 39,096 469.200 622 4689578 L00 TOTAL CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ----------------------------------------- 6.276.935 523.069 59,436 59.436 6.217.499 955 6,LI6,544 99 COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES COMMUNITY GROUPS TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 14.500 1.108 600 600 13.900 lis 13.785 95 ' TOTAL COMMUNITY SROUPS 14,500 1,208 600 bD0 13.900 115 139785 95 4T4 OF JULY E CIVIC EVENTS, ETC. TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 15,000 1.248 15,000 ' I5.UO0 100 TOTAL COVTRA--TUAL SERVICES 21,000 1.748 10,210 10,210 10.790 10,790 51 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1U,950 911 980 960 91970 1 91969 9L TOTAL 4TH JF JULY E CIVIC EVENTS, 415#950 3,9U7 11.190 11,190 35,760 1 35,759 T6 HOLIDAY DECORATIONS TOTAL PERSONAL SERVICES 2,950 245 2.950. 2.950 100 TOTAL CONTRACTUAL SERVICES 1,500 875 10.500 109,500 100 TOTAL COMMODITIES 1,000 83 1,000 1.000 100 TOTAL HOLIDAY DECORATIONS 14,450 1,203 141450 14,450 too TOTAL COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ---------------------------------------- 7:,900 6,318 11.790 111790 64.110 116 63.994 84 LIBRARY,SERVICES LIBRARY UPERATI'JNS TOTAL DEBT S'_RVICE EXPENSE 2,546.920 Z12.24Z 1,546.910 1,546,920 100 ' TOTAL LIORARY OPERATIONS 2,540.920 212,242 2,546,920 2,546,920 LOU TOTAL LIBRARY SEtYICES ------------------------------------------ 29546.920 212.242 2.546,920 2.546,920 100 DEBT SERVICE FUNDS GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE 1#28Z.350 106.857 3,643 3,643 112781TOT 1.278,707 100 TOTAL GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS 1,282,350 106,857 3,643 3.643 11278,707 1,278,707 LOC SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS TOTAL DEBT SERVIC-_ EXPENSE 85,905 - 7.157 95,905 85,905 100 TOTAL SPECIAL SERVICE AREA BONDS 85,905 7,157 85,905 85005 100 TUTAL DE3T SERVILE FUNDS ----------------------------------------- L.363,255 114.014 3,643 3,643 1,364,612 1.364.612 LOU 3 PENSION FUNDS EMPLOYEE PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICe EXPENSE TOTAL EMPLOYEE PENSIONS POLICE PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICc EXPENSE TOTAL POLICE PENSIONS FIKEMENS PENSIONS TOTAL DEBT SERVICE EXPENSE TOTAL FIREMLNS PENSIONS TOTAL PENSION FUNUS ----------------------------- 11 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT ' 9UDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD O1 ENDING 5/31/90 1990-91 Y—T—D Y—T—D CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL 741.600 61.798 76.599 76.599 741,600 61.798 76.599 76.599 1.652.000 137.665 39.544 399544 1,651,000 137.665 39.544 39.544 1.753.000 146,081 41,591 41.591 1.7539000 1469001 41,591 41,591 49146.600 3459544 1579734 157,734 PAGE 24 UNEXPENOEO UNENCUM % BALANCE ENCUMBERED BALANCE BAL 665,O0t 6659001 90 665.001 665.001 90 11612,456 1,612.456 98 1,611,456 1,611,456 98 1.Tt1,4U9 19711,409 98 1,711.409 1,711,409 98 39988,866 3,988,866 96 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BUDGET EXPENSE REPORT ACCOUNTING PERIOD Ol ENOING 5131140 i490-41 Y -T -O Y -T -O CUR MO BUDGET ESTIMATE ACTUAL ACTUAL TDTAL BUDGET EXPENSE 43,371.705 2.078.728 3.613.431 2.078.728 Village of �,_icunt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois a INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR LIQUOR LICENSE AT BRENTWOOD SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER There was a request made by John be Kin Corporation, which are John Moy and Kin Chan, who are requesting a Class R liquor License for consumption at dining tables for a Chinese restaurant which they anticipate opening up in September at the Brentwood Square Shopping Center. The size of the establishment is approximately 1400 square feet and it would be two stores down from the existing Photos' Hot Dogs. They are requesting a license for liquor although they have had experience working in and, in fact, owning Chinese restaurants in the past. They have not had a liquor license. The establishments they have owned were carry -out Chinese food. They anticipate having a Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese food specialties. They will be opening for the lunch hour and up until 9:30 on weekdays and 10:30 on weekends. They are not interested in liquor sales to take place without food service at the table. They are U. S. citizens and are in the process of contacting the Police Department for fingerprints and other information they need as far as the State license is concerned. The Brentwood Square Shopping Center has been having some problems with leasing up their spaces and has had a major tenant, the Ace Hardware already close its establishment at this Center. This is now the third request for a liquor License in this shopping center. Photos' Hot Dogs already has a beer and wine license. There is a request that has been made verbally, although they have not come forward, for a package liquor store in this shopping center and this is now the third request, however, this is connected with a fall service restaurant. If this were to be granted, I believe there would be more than sufficient licenses at this one shopping center and we should seriously review whether or any additional Liquor Licenses should be granted at this particular shopping center. The Chinese restaurant that was operated by the Chan family was China City in Chinatown at 6207 South Kedzie. JOHN FULTON DIXON JFD/rcw attachment Village of _lount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois a INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 26, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR CLASS C RETAIL PACKAGE LIQUOR LICENSE ONE OF THE UNITS AT BRENTWOOD SQUARE SHOPPING CENTER There has been a request by Mr. Bradley Hohn, who is the President of Kensington Corporation, which would like to have consideration for a Retail liquor License at the Brentwood Square Shopping Center. Mr. Holm and one other individual, a Kathleen Stein who is a financial investor in the corporation, were in my office. I fully explained the posture of the Village concerning liquor sales and the reluctance of the Board to automatically grant Retail Liquor Licenses. The individuals involved indicated to me that at the present time, they plan to be part of the United Liquor Stores, as an affiliate. They anticipate having hours from 10:00 a.m. until 10:00 p.m. and in addition to the retail package sales, they anticipate also providing delivery services. They feel that the senior population in town would support a delivery service. Mr. Hohn has not had a Liquor License in his name, although he has had over five years of experience; in particular with wines. He, as well as Ms. Stein, have also worked in restaurants. They anticipate taking about one-half of the old Ace Hardware space which is about 5,000 square feet and they would anticipate it would take about two weeks for them to be prepared in order to move in and stock the establishment. The granting of this License would then mean that we would have three Liquor Licenses at the Brentwood Shopping Center, assuming that the Class R License for the Oriental Restaurant would be granted. JOHN FULTON d1tN JFD/rcw attachment Village of L cunt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois 2V INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY DATE: JUNE 28, 1990 SUBJECT: COMMISSION APPOINTMENT I hereby nominate Janice Farley, 116 North Emerson Street, 255-8755, to serve on the Mount Prospect Constitution Bicentennial Commission as the replacement for Rachel Toeppen, who has resigned from the Commission. GERALD L FARLEY GLF/rcw VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-31-V-90, NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH LOCATION: 1400 KENSINGTON ROAD DATE: JUNE 13, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for zoning variations filed by the Northwest Assembly of God Church. The application was originally filed for (8) eight variations. A number of variations were eliminated due to later revisions of the site plan. The two variations reviewed by the Zoning Board were as follows: 1. A variation of the parking requirement of 543 spaces to allow 512 parking spaces. This is a variation of 31 parking spaces. 2. A variation of the 35% lot coverage in an R -X Residential District to permit a 61% lot coverage. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of April 26 and May 10. At the hearings, Attorney Greg Gann and expert witnesses presented evidence and testimony in support of the request. The attorney and experts explained that the proposed parking was sufficient for the Church, and that there would be no parking problem at peak times. Concerning the lot coverage variation, the attorney and experts demonstrated that this lot coverage for the church was typical of other churches in the Village, so the request was consistent with existing conditions. Also, the site will have complete stormwater management, so the higher lot coverage would not cause any flooding on adjoining properties. Additional details on the variations and testimony are found in the attached minutes. Approximately 10 residents spoke in opposition to the request. Residents were concerned about the large capacity of the church, and the fact that the large parking lot would adjoin single family homes on the west and north. Residents also believed the church would create traffic problems on Kensington Road, and effect property values. The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 2-5 to deny the request. The majority voted against the variations, believing that not all the required standards for variations had been addressed. Members were opposed to the higher lot coverage, and stated that an adequate hardship had not been proven, Accordingly, the Zoning Board recommends that the request be denied. DMC:hg KE�+i1N STON 40�� ditl@t Nw�ST ASs�+`e6�Y F+s GFts N� 1� "'� a MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS I ZBA-CASE NO. 31-V-90 Hearing Date: May 10, 1990 PETITIONER: Northwest Assembly of God SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1400 Kensington Rd. PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 1990 REQUEST: Variations from: Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. Section 14.1004.A to allow a 401 building height instead of 28'. Section 14.3012.A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. Section 14.3017 to allow 8.51 wide parking stall size instead of 9'. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building height. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Peter Lannon Len Petrucelli Ronald Cassidy Lois Brothers Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May ABSENT: None OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating this is a continuation from the April 26, 1990 Zoning Board meeting at the petitioners request. He then asked the petitioner to proceed with their request. Gregory Gann, the attorney for Northwest Assembly of God, thanked the Board for having this meeting at his request and noted that the Church has made additional modifications but they are requesting a variation for 31 parking spaces. Mr. Gann also asked that all of the exhibits be entered as evidence. He then continued stating that the Church had met with the neighbors the prior Monday and Wednesday night and listened to the concerns of the neighbors and have made ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 2 of 6 significant reductions to the proposal on the parking and lot coverage. Mr. Gann then compared,the Northwest Assembly of God to other churches stating that they have as much right as any other church to worship where and how they like. Mr. Gann then commented that the church is not taxed but the people that attend the church are just like anyone else and felt the comment regarding the Church not being taxed was very unfair. He asked that the comment be stricken from the record. Mr. Gann then stated the modifications to the proposal has been greatly reduced bringing the lot coverage to 61% from 75% and the parking spaces from 724 to 512 which is a 30% decrease. He then stated that the Church is in conformity with other churches in Mount Prospect as far as the lot coverage. He stated that sanctuary size has been reduced from 2000 as originally proposed then to 1660 and now it will be 1400. He also stated that the elimination of parking on the East perimeter puts them in the retention requirements providing more than required by law. The site plan basically stays the same for the building. Mr. Cassidy asked if someone from the church could calculate the impervious surface and ground coverage for the existing building at the site. Mr. Gann complimented David Clements and Paul Bednar for their excellent suggestions and also the Village staff on their help. Mr. Gann then introduced Steven Olsen, architect for the petitioner. Mr. Olsen stated that the modification to the proposed site would eliminate 1 driveway and 2 rows of parking on the East edge of the property and would relocate the handicapped parking spaces to the West of the property. He also stated that there would be more landscaping and the island would be enlarged. Mr. Gann then introduced Dave Swanson, an expert witness for the church. Mr. Swanson is a Vice -President of a construction company and an Engineer. He is not a member of the Church. Mr. Swanson stated that Mr. Gann had asked him to a do some consulting for him on the churches in Mount Prospect. Mr. Swanson, then compared the impervious surface and the size of the lot and building of the churches in Mount Prospect to the proposed church for Northwest Assembly of God. Mr. Swanson then proceeded by giving the Board the calculations for: 1. St. Raymond's School and Church -88% impervious surface. This property has 90,000 square feet. 2. Cumberland Baptist Church -74% impervious surface. this property has 39,000 square feet. ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 3 of 6 3. St. Paul Lutheran School and Church -the church and parking lot are 70% and the North part of the property is 51%. Mr. Swanson noted that the school is under construction and he received his calculations from the -proposed drawing and what is existing on the property. The square footage is 51% with both the school and church. 4.` Mount Prospect Bible Church- 69% lot coverage. There was no square footage given on this property. 5. St. Mark Lutheran School and Church -64% lot coverage and impervious surface. Mr. Swanson noted that this property is located across the street from each other and the calculation includes both pieces of property. 6. St. Emily's School and Church- 62% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 7. Peace Reformed Church -61% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 8. St. Thomas Beckett Church -60% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 9. Trinity United Methodist Church- 59% impervious surface. There was no square footage given for this property. 10. St. Cecilia's Church -57% impervious surface and lot coverage. There was no square footage given for this property. 11. St. John Episcopal church -47% impervious surface and lot coverage. Mr. Swanson noted that there is no off street parking for this church. There was no square footage given for this property. 12. Northwest Covenant Church -51% impervious surface and lot coverage. Mr. Swanson noted that he felt the parking for this facility is inadequate. There was no square footage given for this property. 13. Community Presybyterian Church -39% impervious surface and lot coverage. Mr. Swanson noted that the sanctuary at this church seats 350 people and has 50 parking spaces. There was no square footage given for this property. Chairman Basnik asked how many parking spaces St. Raymond's has. Mr. Swanson stated he did not count the number of parking spaces but commented that they have a unique parking lot, allowing everyone to pull in at one end and exiting at the other end. Mr. Gann then introduced Dave Landowehr, the engineer for the Northwest Assembly of God Church. ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 4 of 6 Mr. Landowehr stated that the requirements for the retention for the new proposal has exceeded the requirements for the Village and the Metropolitian Sanitary District. Storage for the property will be in the Northeast corner of the property by the dry basin. Mr. Gann then introduced Victor Ley, Metro Transportation. Mr. Ley stated that with the revisions to the site plan the amount of time to exit the parking lot after a service would be 25 minutes. Mr. Gann then reminded the Board of the size of the driveways for ingress on egress with each drive being three ,lines. Mr. Ley then stated the level of service for the parking lot would be level C on,the eastern drive and the western drive would be a level B. Mr. Ley also stated that the level of service would remain the same at level A. Mr. Ley stated that no research was done on the side streets Newberry and Westgate, but by his opinion would not be affected by the proposed church. Mr. Gann then asked Mr. Lay if the level of service on Kensington would be affected by the ingress to the Church parking lot. Mr. Ley stated it" would not affect Kensington Road. Mr. Gann then reviewed the requirements for a variation. He feels that the church has met all the requirements for variations to be granted. Mr. Gann then stated that the church is in no way a threat to the community and will not bring down the characteristics to the neighborhood. He also stated that this is a permitted use in a single family zoned area. David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that this property is zoned R -X and this allows up to 35% lot coverage and the church's proposal is reasonable with the 61% lot coverage which falls between 35 and 757x, found in commercial areas. Ron Alfirevic, 805 Newberry Ln., presented the Board members with a copy of the comments by the neighborhood. Mr. Alfirevic stated that the proposal for the Church is still a bit to ambitious. He also feels that the traffic studies are invalid considering Kensington and Wolf Rds. are under construction and most people are avoiding the area. Mr. Alfirevic also stated that he had counted the cars on two occasions in the Church's temporary location at River Trails Junior High, one service had 250 cars the other had 230 cars. On each occasion it took the cars to exit was about 30 minutes. He also stated that the homeowners property values will decrease with the new development. Mr. Alfirevic also stated that the burden of sacrifice seems to be on the residents. ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 5 of 6 Dick Radzak, 1611 Ironwood, commented that this is a developed area and the main reason he and probably most of the other residents bought there was because of the park district property being right there. He felt it would be good for his children when they were growing up. Mr. Radzak also questioned if the church fits the property and if not then it is not welcome in the neighborhood. He also questioned the height of the building and the noise from the church not only from cars but if the decide to put in an organ of some kind. Ken Lato's, 1002 Newberry, noted that there 'is no sidewalks in the neighborhood and is concerned on the impact of the traffic in the neighborhood. Bernie Donahue, 1605 Ironwood, feels the church has not reduced the size of the building and the problem is still there. Don Raab, 802 Newberry, feel the revisions have not changed anything as far as the lighting, storm sewer and the size of building. Mr. Raab is also concerned with the property value. Martin Venticinque, 811 Newberry, also is concerned with the property value. He also feels that Mr. Gann thinks everything is resolved with the neighbors and nothing really has been. Mary Ann Pickley, 1113 Sycamore, stated that she works for Baird and Warner Real Estate and feels the property value would very much be affected. Tin Metling,,1609 Ironwood, fells the church has not proven any hardship. Robert Artman, 806 Newberry, feels the site at Kensington and Wolf would be better. for the Church. Mr. Landowehr stated that the existing lot coverage at Feehanville School is 16%. Mr. Gann then stated that the total square footage on the property including parking stalls, the aisles and sidewalks would be 180,000 sq. ft. The Board then reviewed the Case by going over the requirements for a variation. Chairman Basnik questioned on changing the ordinance of allowing a Church in residential. Mrs. O'May felt the church has a right to be there and would ZBA-31-V-90 May 10, 1990 Page 6 of 6 not object. Mr. Brettrager asked that -a recommendation to the Village Board be made on landscaping. Chairman Basnik still questioned the size of the building. Mr. Petrucelli feels that no hardship has been proven. Mr. Lannon questioned if this a convenience for only having one service. Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioners a Special Use with the variations from: Section 14.1002.E to allow a lot coverage of now 61% instead of 35%. Section 14.1004.A to allow a 40" building height instead of 282. Section 14.3012.A to allow 512 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5" wide parking stall size instead of 9'. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building height. Chairman Basnik asked if anyone objected that they vote one time on all variations. No one objected. Mr. Lannon moved, Mrs. O'may seconded. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, O'May NAYS: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Basnik Motion denied by a vote of 2-5. These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPART Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN *-,-- FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING DATE: MAY 4, 1994 SUBJECT: NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH On Friday, May 4, I met with Attorney Greg Gann of Northwest Assembly of God Church. We discussed the Church's variation application, and the public hearing that was continued to May 10. Mr. Gann has advised me of the following: 1. At this time, the church is proposing to reduce seating in the main sanctuary to 1400. This is accomplished by deleting the balcony seating. 2. With this change, total parking has been reduced from 616 to 512, a reduction of 104 spaces. The 512 spaces represent 467 spaces for the sanctuary, and 45 spaces for the existing building. Please note that 76 spaces are required for the main building, which is used for office, classrooms and meeting space. Mr. Gann is requesting that the parking variation of 31 spaces be reconsidered for the existing building. 3. Total lot coverage is proposed for 59% to 60%, a reduction from the 66% discussed at the last meeting. As you know, 35% is the maximum lot coverage in the R -X District, Mr. Gann also stated that one result of this revision is that when church membership nears a point where there is a need for the balcony seating, the church would file for whatever lot coverage or parking variations would be necessary to accommodate the increased seating. In this way, the church has an opportunity to prove itself a good neighbor before maximum use of the site is allowed. Two additional staff comments are as follows: 1. Concerning traffic generation, staff notes that times of peak use of the church facilities will be Sundays and Wednesdays. This peak time will not coincide with rush hour traffic on Kensington, particularly when traffic is leaving the church late Wednesday evenings or Sundays at noon or 1:00 p.m. Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals May 4, 1990 Page 2 2. The lot coverage requirement in single family districts is intended to regulate development in areas where there is no stormwater detention. The ordinance is stating that you must have more open space than lot coverage, to prevent over -building and help control run-off. Northwest Assembly of God provides on-site detention to control stormwater. In other zoning districts where detention is required for development, lot coverage is allowed from 75% to 800/b. The church provides 59% to 60% lot coverage, a good compromise between the strict residential zoning requirement of 35%, and the 75% to 80% standard in areas where stormwater detention is required. Lastly, the staff supports the request, and believes the approach by the church in revising the plan is as sensitive as they can be to adjoining property owners, while still allowing for reasonable growth of their congregation. DMC:hg cc: John Fulton Dixon MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA-31-V-90 Hearing Date: April 26, 1990 PETITIONER: Northwest Assembly of God SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1400 Kensington Road PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 1990 REQUEST: Variations from: Section 14.1002.A to allow a zero foot front yard for parking instead of 40'. Section 14.1002.B to allow a 5' side yard instead of 10'. Section 14.1002.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' instead of 25'. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. Section 14.1004.A to allow a 40.' building height of 28'. Section 14.3012.A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide parking stall size instead of 9'. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building height. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Len Petrucelli Robert Brettrager Marilyn O'May ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience Chairman Basnik introduced the case stating the following variations are requested by the petitioner: 1. Section 14.1002.A to allow a zero foot front yard for parking instead of 40'. 2. Section 14.1002.B to allow a 5' side yard instead of 101. 3. Section 14.1002.E to allow a rear yard of 10' instead of 25'. 4. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. 5. Section 14.004.A to allow a 40' building height. ZBA-31-V-90- April 26, 1990 Page 2 of 6 6. Section 14.3012.A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. 7. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.51 wide parking stall size instead of 91. 8. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 401 building height. Gregory Gann, representing the petitioner, Northwest Assembly of God, opened thanking the Board and noting that on Monday, April 23, 1990, that Church representatives had met with the neighbors of the community at the Northwest Ministry Center also known as the former Feehanville School, to resolve some of their concerns. Mr. Gann also stated that the requests for variations numbers two and six are no longer needed. The lot coverage has been brought down to 67%-68%. Also, the parking spaces have been brought down to 616 spaces, and the sanctuary size has been reduced to 1620. David Landowehr, the project Engineer representing the Church, stated that the proposed development of the Church would have no impact on the sewer and water, which would be within Citizens Utilities District. He also explained the storm water run-offs and stated the Church would have their own detention basin for stormwater management. Steven Olsen, the architect for the Church and also a parishioner, explained to the Board about the design for the building and the reasons for the size. Mr. Olsen stated that the Northwest Ministry building would be the "base" of the new church, having classrooms which are existing and a large lobby and the sanctuary which would seat up to 1,620 people. The building, which will be up to 401 in height and slope down, allowing future seating if the Church grows in size. Victor Ley, representing the Church from Metro Transportation from Bloomingdale, IL. studied the traffic flow on Kensington and Wolf Roads for a twenty-four hour period and figured in the traffic from the Church in the hours of 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. and felt there was no impact on the traffic flow from his study. Mr. Cassidy questioned him if he included the side streets such as Westgate Rd. in his study. Mr. Lay stated Metro had not included the side streets in his study. Jim Nichols, Pastor for the Northwest Assembly of God, commented on the Church and their plans for rebuilding. Mr. Nichols stated that the Church likes to hold one service and wants the whole congregation to be there at once. ZBA-31-V-90 April 26, 1990 Page 3 of 6 In his closing statement, Mr. Gann address the variation standards and stated that the Church has met all the Zoning requirements and the exhibits that have been presented to the Board will hopefully clarify their proposal. Mr. Gann also stated he knows that all the concerns from the neighbors such as the car fumes and headlights are still going to be an issue and they hope to.work,it out with the neighbors. He also stated that churches are allowed in residential areas and feels that it would be beneficial for the community. Mr. Gann thanked the Board and stated that the experts with the Church would be here for follow up questions. Chairman Basnik complimented Mr. Gann on his presentation stating that they answered most of the questions before they were even asked. Chairman Basnik then asked Paul Bednar from the Village to make his comments. Paul Bednar, Planner with the Village of Mount Prospect, stated that the proposal which is on a 9 -acre parcel is zoned for single-family which allows a Church and/or school. He also stated that the Village also had concerns with the perimeter setbacks to the single-family homes to the north and to the west and the lot coverage. He noted that the Church is required to put in a 251 setback and the landscape buffers should hopefully block the parking lot from the neighbors. The parking lot and other basins would be sufficient for the stormwater flow. He also stated that the lot coverage has been brought down to 67% - The remaining variations on the building height and parking stalls are also reasonable requests considering the height would only be at one point of the building and sloping down and the parking stall widths would be okay considering that the majority of people would be staying for a period of time as to a commercial establishment. In closing, Paul felt that the Church has addressed the staff concerns. Ron Alfirevic, 805 Newberry, spokesman for the neighbors, stated that the major concern is the number of parking spaces and the traffic that will take place with this large of a facility. Mr. Alfirevic stated that at an estimate time of 616 cars to leave the parking lot with only two exits at an average of six seconds would take 62 minutes'. Mr. Alfirevic feels that with all these cars trying to leave the parking lot at "one time" would create a lot of "gunk" from the fumes and then causing traffic problems on Kensington Road. zBA-31-V-90 April 26,1990 Page 4 of 6 Dick Radzak, 1611 Ironwood, stated his major concern is the large parking lot and noted 'that this is most of the neighbors concerns. Mr. Radzak also feels that the study on the traffic flow is inaccurate because Wolf and Kensington Roads are under construction and this would drastically change when the construction is complete allowing more traffic on these roads. Mr. Radzak also feels that people attending the services will start using the side streets and affecting their neighborhood as far as the safety issue. Tim Metling, of 1609 Ironwood, stated that he and a neighbor took a ride through the Opus Business Center and noted the height on the parking lot lights is 18' to 20' which is reasonable and that the churches request for 26' would cast a decent shadow on the surrounding homes. Mr. Metling also stated that a another neighbor asked a realtor what the affect on their homes would be with a facility this size. The realtor sent back a letter stating that it would decrease their home values by 10%-20% which in Mr. Metling's view would decrease their homes by $20,000.00. Mr. Metling also stated that they asked the Church how many Mount Prospect residents attend their church and the church said in a 5 mile radius was 50% of their congregation. Jordan Saletko, 803 Newberry, stated he had two issues to address. The first concern is the Human Services for the neighborhood. Mr'. Saletko stated that if someone in the neighborhood needed to get to the hospital or if an ambulance or the police department had to get into the neighborhood they would have a difficult time withallthe traffic that the church would create on Kensington Roads. Mr. Saletko's other issue is how the Church feels they have been good neighbors. Mr. Saletko stated that on numerous occasions he has had to pick up garbage that has been tossed over his fence from the Church and presented the Board with a frisbee that had "Northwest Assembly of God" on it. Donald Raab, 802 Newberry, stated that he has been a resident of the Northeast corner of Kensington and Wolf Roads since 1971. He noted that the Northwest Assembly of God has only 600 parishioners and feels that the church is proposing is a gross overuse of this property. Mr. Raab also stated that Saint Emily's Church on Central Road has over 3000 parishioners and they have no problem to accommodate them. He also stated that the Church has over the past 17 years had an up and down history in the number of parishioners from 100 to 1200 back down to 600. ZBA-31-V-90 April 26,1990 Page 5 of 6 Peter Hanchar, 1311 Ironwood, stated he has a few concerns with the new Church. His first concern is will this new building be fire protected because the previous building was not. Gerald Sharlog,'1400 E. Ironwood, stated his main concern is.the parking lot and the lot coverage and used Willow Creek as an example that as it grew they asked for more property and will the Northwest Assembly of God ask for more if they do indeed increase in size. Martin Venticinique, 811 Newberry, stated a concern to the Board and to the experts the church had brought with them. He questioned where will all the snow go with the amount of with the amount of impervious surface. Mr. Raab also questioned what will be done with the property on the corner of Kensington and Wolf. They were told it would be a gymnasium of some sort. Bob Fitzgerald, 1319 Mulberry, commented that the neighborhood already has no sidewalks forcing the residents and their children to use the streets and the impact on the neighborhood of the cars from the church will become a safety issue. Mr. Gann, attorney for the Church , addressed the questions for the concerned the neighbors. Mr. Gann stated that he has been the attorney for the Northwest Assembly of God for the last 12 years but is not a parishioner. The other experts are not parishioners of the church except for Steven Olsen the architect. He also stated that a large percentage of the parishioners are from Mount Prospect. As for the fire protection issue, Mr. Gann stated that the new buildings will be sprinklered. Mr. Ley addressed the traffic concerns. He told the Board the peak hours of his study and that this was done during the churches service hours. Chairman Basnik asked Mr. Ley to address the question of the amount of time it would be to exit the parking lot of 616 cars. Mr. Ley could not answer the question. Mr. Landowher addressed the utility and water issues. He stated that the impact on the neighborhood would be minimal. Chairman Basnik addressed the pastor if the church feels it will grow. Mr. Nichols hopes that the church will grow and that this new facility will accommodate them. Mr. Brettrager questioned the pastor on the number of services, and the pastor stated again that the church likes to meet asone congregation. Mr. Gann addressed the snow removal question by the neighbors. He stated that the church would not use the 251 perimeter as a place to put the snow, but would simply ZBA-31-V-90 April 26, 1990 Page 6 of 6 put it in the parking lot and lose parking spaces as every other parking lot in the Village does in that period of time. Mr. Gann also stated that they will prevent people from using the side streets to park on and if need be they will have the Village patrol. Chairman Basnik asked the board to address the subject and closed off the public discussion. Mr. Lannon asked Steven Olsen what would be done with the building on Kensington and Wolf Rds. Mr. Olsen stated the building would be used as a gymnasium type of building with a few classrooms and a lobby. It would also remain the same height as the existing building. He also questioned the stormwater flow. If it was based on the 100 year flood. Mr. Landowehr stated it was based on the 100 year flood and if water was to exceed this amount it would flow southeast or into the basins. Mr. Lannon then asked Mr. Nichols why the church only had one service. Again Mr. Nichols stated that the church acts as one congregation. Mr. Petrucelli stated that he saw a problem with this because schools and churches were compatible with the single-family for offering services to the community, and this large project seems to be acting as more of a commercial enterprise than as a service to the community. Mrs. O'May disagreed with Mr. Petrucelli on the commercial use of the church stating that there are other churches in the Village and they're all in the same situation. Mr. Cassidy feels this church is to large for this parcel, stating that what that the church wants should not be zoned R -X. Mr.Brettrager disagreed with Mr.Cassidy stating that St.Raymond's in Mount Prospect has used all their impervious surface. Chairman Basnikstatedhe is still concerned on the growth of the Church and what would happen if they didn't increase in size, what would the neighborhood and the Village end up with. He also stated the concern of the parking lot, he is still questioning the amount of time it would take to empty it out. Mr. Lannon stated that this is a high intensity use for this parcel of land. He also stated that this is a lot of coverage for this property, and he would not support the proposal unless they brought in a better landscaping plan. Mr. Gann asked the Board if the Church could return the following Thursday to address the comments made by the Village. Mr. Brettrager asked that the reasons should be brought out know so the Church knows what to address. The two Main concerns of the Zoning Board are the lot coverage and the size of the church. Chairman Basnik adjourned the meeting stating that the case would be continued to the following Thursday unless heard otherwise. This case must still be heard before the Village Board. Michelle Thompson Recording Secretary VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT MANNING AND ZONING MPAWTM M Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER SUBJECT: ZBA-31-V-90, NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH LOCATION. 1400 KENSINGTON ROAD DATE: APRIL 19, 1990 The applicants are requesting the following variations: 1. Section 14.1002A to allow a zero foot front yard for parking instead of 40 feet. 2. Section 14.10023 to allow a 5' side yard instead of 19. 3. Section 14.1002.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' instead of 25'. 4. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%. 5. Section 14.1004A to allow a 40' building height instead of 28'. 6. Section 14.3012A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code. 7. Section 143017 to allow an 8.5' wide parking stall size instead of 9'. 8. Section 14.1004.17 to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building height. The following comments were submitted by various staff departments. 1. Kensington Road is a State road. An I.17.O.T. permit will be required for all access to Kensington Road. Right and left turn exit lanes should be provided at all exits from the church property. The State will determine whether turning lanes should be provided on Kensington Road itself. Church officials should contact I.D.O.T. regarding this matter. Also, it must be verified as to whether Kensington Road right-of-way is fully dedicated. Gil Basnik - Page 2 ZBA-31-V-90 April 19, 1990 2. There are casements shown on the plat of survey. Is there anything actually located within thew easements? 3. An M.S.D. permit will be required. The Village has no sanitary sewer at this location. Citizens utilities may not allow the church to use their sanitary service without using their water also. The Village has an 8" watermain on the south side of Kensington Road. There is also a large North West Water Commission watermain on the south side of Kensington Road which must be avoided. 4. All Development Code requirements must be met, including but not limited to, street lights sidewalks and 11 parkway trees. New curbs will also be required along the parking lot perimeter. Storm sewer connections are both Village and State jurisdiction. An I.D.O.T. permit will be required to connect into the State sewer. 5. The present surface drainage flow is from the west, north and east onto this property. Drainage must not be blocked from any direction as a result of new construction. On-site detention will be required. 6. The Fire Prevention Bureau will determine location of all hydrants. Fire lanes must meet the fire codes. 7. Crime Prevention Office should be involved in reviewing the church security. 8. No construction equipment or grading changes will be allowed near the root zones of existing parkway trees. 9. A general concern was noted regarding the traffic flow in and out of this property as a result of the large expansion. 10. A resubdivision, consolidating all lots into one, is required. The Northwest Assembly of God Church owns the nine acre parcel which once was the home of the Feehanville School. The former 20,000 square foot school building had been converted to office and classrooms for the church years ago. The church is now proposing a 37,650 square foot building expansion on the property in order to accommodate a church auditorium with seating capacity of 2,000 people. The remaining 44,000 square feet will be office and classroom space. In an attempt to accommodate this size of expansion along with the required parking, a number of variations are requested. This prop", along with adjacent park land to the east is zoned R -X, large lot single family. IU present zoning allows a church as a permitted use. To the west and north is a single family subdivision zoned R-1. On the south side of Kensington Road is the Kensington Business Park zoned 1-1. The River Trails Junior High School and park land abut this property on the eastern edge. . The Northwest Assembly of God also owns the GO Basnik - Page 3 ZBA-31-V-90 April 19,19% comer lot property on Wolf and Kensington which, up until last year's fire, was the home of the church sanctuary. The Comprehensive Plan, updated as recently as December of 1988, divides this parcel for two uses; the west being Institutional and the eastern half being Community/Regional Open Space. A change to the Comprehensive Plan will be required. A large portion of this property is presently vacant and this is especially important considering the large percentage of vacant land abutting the single family homes. There is only one area along the west property line where there is an existing 5 foot parking lot setback. For this reason, we question why the new parking lot cannot meet the setback requirements of 10 feet on the west and 25 feet on the north. Understandably, the total number of parking spaces will be decreased along with a probably decrease in the building size as a result But it appears to be a feasible option. The petitioner should address this comment. Each specific variation is addressed below: 1. A zero foot front yard to leave the !Wstin lung a= inta at the southwesl comer, It would be possible to remove a portion of this asphalt area in order to meet Code. Approximately 8 parking spaces would be lost as a result. An increase in the parking lot setback will benefit the on-site traffic flow and safety. The remainder of the front yard setback meets Code. 2. A 5 foot side yard algng the west pro;&M line instead of 10 feet, It is also possible to increase the setback on the west property line to 10, by relocating the entire parking area 5 feet to the east. Approximately, 7 spaces would be lost with the change. The 10 foot side yard would accommodate a better twuLwape/buffer treatment. The minimum recommended for plantings is 10 feet. 3. A 10 fQgt rear yard (on,, I h) instead Qf 25 feet - By increasing this setback to 20 feet, a number of parking spaces would be deleted, subject to a redesign. The resultant 20 foot landscape buffer would be desired in order to provide a good landscape treatment, however, it is possible to do a fair to adequate buffer within a 10 foot strip. 4. 75% l+verveliUber-tban 35% - For an institutional propert34 such as a church, 35% total lot coverage is somewhat unrealistically low. This standard is primarily for single family areas where there is no detention. A single family house, could meet this coverage requirement with ease. Commercial or industrial buildings would be allowed 75% lot coverage, by Code. Since this church building, located on a large single family lot is a hybrid, it seems reasonable that the allowable lot -coverage be more than 35% but less than 75%. By providing increased perimeter yard setbacks, as recommended above, the lot coverage would be decreased. Gil Basnik - Page 4 ZBA-31-V-90 April 19, 1990 5. A 40 foot building height instead of 28 feet to accommodate a dome on the �11x ;tc�iia:W - Building elevation drawings will help to visualize this height. The fact that the budding dome is to be located at the canter of this 9 acre parcel, should help minimize any visual impact it will have on the neighborhood. 6. 724 pig aW instead d of 755 - we concur with the findings of the petitioners traffic consultant, that the parking spaces provided will be adequate even on the busiest day. 7• Allow an 8.5 foot wide parking s.Wl instead of 9 feel - The Zoning Code allows the Director of Planning and Zoning discretion to permit smaller stall widths for long-term parking in industrial or office settings. An institutional use, such as this church, is also an appropriate long-term parking provider and could be permitted an 8.5 foot stall width. 8. W 'v The Code requires additional setbacks in an R -.X District, if a single family building exceeds a height of 30 feet. The church budding is not a single family building but is located on a single family lot and, therefore, this variation was added to the list of requests, even though we are of the opinion that it does not pertain. Even so, the church auditorium is set back well beyond the minimums required within this district„ Also, it sbould be noted that parking lot lighting cannot shine onto adjoining single family properties. It would be appropriate to only allow parking lot lights on evenings when there is a service or activity. Lastly, it is important to emphasize that all storm water run-off from the new parking areas will be controlled and directed to landscaped detention areas in front of the building. No stormwater will discharge onto adjoining properties. In summary, additional parking lot setbacks can be accommodated which will benefit the single family neighbors and decrease the lot coverage. The result may be the reduction of a very small number of seats in the auditorium. The petitioner must adequately address this possibility. PB:hg CAF/ 6/27/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1400 EAST KENSINGTON ROAD AND COMMONLY KNOWN AS NORTHW -E,9-T .. ASSEMBLY OF GOD OURCH WHEREAS, Northwest Assembly of God Church (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, which application was subsequently amended by deleting specific variation requests, for property commonly known as 1400 East Kensington Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property), legally described as: The East 260 feet of the South 600 feet of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, together with the West 300 feet of the South 600 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, together with the North 550 feet of the West 158.4 feet of the East 335 feed of the West 635 feet of the South 600 feet of the East 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 26, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian, all in Cook County, Illinois and WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks variations from Section 14.1002.E of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to allow an impervious lot surface coverage of 61%, instead of the permitted maximum of 35%; a variation from Section 14.3012.A. to permit 512 parking spaces, instead of the required 543; and, a variation from Section 14.1004.A to permit a building height of forty feet (401), instead of the permitted 28 feet at the peak of the church santuary; and WHEREAS, public hearings were held on the variations requested being the subject of ZBA Case No. 31-V-90 before the Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of April, 1990, and the loth day of May, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the loth day of April, 1990; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees of the Village. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect hereby grant the following variations, as shown on the Site Plan attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "All and described as follows. 1. A variation from Section 14.1002.E to allow an impervious surface lot coverage of 61% in order to construct a church sanctuary with a seating capacity of 1,400, related structures and a parking lot. ZBA 31-V-90 Page 2 of 2 2. A variation from Section 14.3012.A to allow 512 parking spaces, instead of the required 543 spaces. 3. A variation from Section 14.1004.A to permit a building height of forty feet (401) for the sanctuary, instead of the permitted height of 281. SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property. SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604 of Chapter 14 of the village Code, the variations granted herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this ordinance. SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of tiggo. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk CAF/ 6/14/90 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18 ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That Schedule III of Article XX entitled "One -Way Streets" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding in proper alphabetical sequence "Boxwood Dr. - Northerly - Btw. wheeling Rd. & Wheeling Rd."; so that hereinafter Section 18.2003 shall include the following: Name of Direction of Street Traffic Movement Description Boxwood Dr. Northerly Btw. Wheeling Rd. & Wheeling Rd. to SECTION TWO: That Schedule IV of Article XX entitled "Stop and Yield Signs" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Boxwood Dr. S. - Eastbound - Wheeling Road". SECTION T.H . � R -BE: That Schedule V of Article XX entitled "No Stopping, Standing or Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Boxwood Dr. - East - The first 20 ft. south of Dogwood Ln." SECTION FOUR: That Schedule V of Article XX entitled "No Stopping, Standing or Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting therefrom "Boxwood Dr. - East - The first 20 ft. north of Dogwood In." SECTION FIVE: That Schedule VI of Article XX entitled "No Parking Any Time" of Chapter IS (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding in proper alphabetic sequence "Boxwood Dr. - East - Btw. Wheeling Rd. & Wheeling Rd."; so' that hereinafter said Section 18.2005 shall include the following: Name of Side of Street Street Description Boxwood Dr. Inner Section Entire Jurisdiction $0 SECTION SIX: That this ordinance shall be in full force and ra Chapter 18 Boxwood Page 2 of 2 effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form the manner provide by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990 Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER K_ FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39.V-90, HUNTINGTON LTD. PARTNERSHIP LOCATION: 1200-1380 S. ELMHURST ROAD (HUNTINGTON SQUARE APTS.) DATE: JUNE 28, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendations on an application for an amendment to the existing Planned Unit Development for Huntington Square Apartments. The application was filed to amend the PUD to permit a parking variation to allow the construction of garages. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 14, 1990. At the meeting, Property Manager Dennis Hughes presented testimony in support of the request. He explained that the ownership of the property would like to construct 86 garage spaces for residents. He stated that there have been many improvements recently completed at the complex, and the garages are just the next step to upgrade the property. Mr. Hughes noted that many residents had inquired about garage spaces, for shelter and security of their vehicles. Mr. Hughes stated that occupancy rates are high at the property, yet parking counts revealed over 100 vacant spaces on 7 different occasions. Mr. Hughes stated that there are approximately 500 parking spaces on-site, and there is sufficient parking for residents of the complex. Dave Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that staff counts confirmed 500 existing spaces with over 100 vacant spaces. Mr. Clements further stated that construction of the 86 garages results in a net loss of 13 spaces at the complex Mr. Clements stated that the application should be measured against the 13 spaces that are lost due to the garage construction. With over 100 vacant spaces as an indication of demand, the loss of 13 spaces would not contribute to a parking problem at Huntington Square. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning Board believes that this would be a good upgrade at the property, providing an important amenity for residents. Members of the Zoning Board determined that there would be sufficient parking on-site as a result of the garages. With over 100 vacant spaces confirmed on a number of dates, the loss of 13 spaces due to the garage construction would not cause a parking shortage. John Fulton Dixon - Page 2 June 28, 1990 Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the existing PUD at Huntington Square Apartments be amended to allow the construction of 86 garages, resulting in a revised parking count of 487 spaces for the 324 apartments, or 1 1/2 spaces per unit. The motion is subject to the garages being constructed of face brick on all four sides, and submittal of a landscape plan. Lastly, it should be noted that a variation of the perimeter setback requirement to allow a 9 1/2 foot setback was withdrawn, as the garages will be built on a conforming 10 foot setback. DMC:hg all 7 La 3fAC[ is OMG14 CUM w 0V\ t3 W 64 cr44 Eb 1-6 C, A3 MISTICSOPPROX) UVING UNITS------------- ---324 PA KING REGUIRED:73 PROPOSED AS ALTERED FOR PROPOSED GARAGifs7---5 OT EXISTING--------- ---590 PROPOSED GARAQES HUNTINGTON SOIJARE APARTMEM MOUNT PROSPF lLt_ JAMES MILTON PAY t A%OC— ARCK REV. 11/27/89 I© MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 38 -SU -90,39-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETITIONER: Huntington Ltd. Partnership SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1200-1380 S. Elmhurst Road PUBLICATION DATE: May 8, 1990 REQUEST: A Special Use amending the Planned Unit Development to allow construction of garages. Also requested are variations from Section 14.2503.6 to allow a 9 1/2 ft. side yard and Section 14.2503.8 to allow 504 parking spaces. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/111,1TERESTED PARTIES: Seven Person in Audience Chairman Basnik introduced this case as a request by Huntington Ltd. Partnership, 1200- 1380 South Elmhurst Road to allow an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development to permit a parking variation to allow the construction of garages. Mr. Dennis Hughes introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated he is the property manager representing the ownership of the apartments. Mr. HHughes stated that ownership in the past several years had spent a substantial amount of money making improvements to Huntington Apartmen%, and that the proposed gazages are just another proposed amenity and improvement for the convenience of the residents. Mr. Hughes stated that many residents had asked about the possibility of garages and that the ownership is now in a position to proceed. Mr Hughes stated that recently Huntington Square had provided a new swim ming pool, deck, repaved portions of the driveway aisles, refurbished all laundry facilities and that the ownership is committed to continue in upgrading the complex. Mr. Hughes stated that the garage construction would require a parking variation and that he had conducted an actual parking survey of vacant spaces at the complex. ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 Mr. Hughes submitted a handout to the Zoning Board that depicted seven parking counts during the month of May and each parking count indicated an excess of over 100 vacant parking spaces. Mr. Hughes then noted that the complex is 97% occupied and that the vacant spaces are not attributable to a high vacancy rate in the apartments. He stated that the garages would be brick construction on all four sides and that the garages would be constructed in two phases. Mr. Dave Clements then summarized the staff report for the benefit of the audience and the Zoning Board and Mr. Clements noted that the parking variation would be necessary to allow the garage construction. He pointed out that building the garages requires more land area than surface spaces, and that the actual net loss of surface parking spaces due to the construction of the garages, was 13 spaces. Mr. Clements stated that this is the figure that needs to be considered when evaluating the request and that the actual demand on * parking has to be measured to see if 13 spaces would create a parking problem. Mr. Clements indicated that the Planning and Zoning staff had also conducted parking space counts at Huntington Square Apartments and the staffs survey confirmed the numbers presented by Mr. Hughes indicated a parking space vacancy in excess of 100. Considering this number of vacant spaces, Mr. Clements indicated that the 13 space loss, as a result of the garage construction, would not create a parking problem for the tenants of the apartment complex. Mr. Clements also pointed out that 84 of the garage spaces are proposed to be located along the south line of the property adjoining the Commonwealth Edison easement and that this location of the structures would place the garages out of sight lines of other condominium projects in Huntington Commons, therefore having no adverse impact on adjoining properties. Chairman Basnik asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Norman Johnson, a resident of a condominium development adjoining the apartment complex, stated he had no objections to the ownership continuing to provide improvements to the apartment complex but he had concerns about the garages being constructed near the bike path on the Commonwealth Edison easement, and the fact that the rear of the garages could be subject to graffiti and an area where Utter could accumulate. Mr. Hughes responded and stated that ownership has five full-time maintenance men at the apartment complex and the rear of the garages would be maintained and any graffiti would be removed immediately, Mr. Hughes noted that this apartment complex is an up -kale rental community charging higher rents than surrounding developments, and as such, maintenance is a high priority. Mr. Mark Parrenti introduced himself to the Zoning Board and stated he is a resident at the apartment complex and a maintenance employee. He stated that graffiti is not a maintenance problemat Huntington Square. Mr. Joseph Filcar stated that he also is a resident of the apartment complex and that he supports the application because he would appreciate having a garage for his vehicle and that this would add security to his automobile, lower his insurance, and provide a much needed enclosed parking for residents in this area. He stated that the garages would be small and have no adverse impact on visibility from the apartments. ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 3 Mr. Ben Gittler introduced himself as a resident of the apartments, and stated he has no objection and that the ownership provides excellent maintenance and care for the property. Mr. Basnik indicated that, from his review, the application merely is providing the garages as an amenity to residents and this is another improvement to the property. Mr. Lannon pointed out that the statements on graffiti are important, but he did not believe that the threat of graffiti should be a major consideration in reviewing the amendment to the PUD. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was determined that the garages would be a positive addition to the apartment complex, and the Zoning Board had no objections. Accordingly, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Ms. Skowron moved that the Zoning Board approve an amendment to the Huntington Square Planned Unit Development to allow a parking variation to permit the construction of garages. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by vote of 6-0. The motion was made subject to a suitable landscaping plan for the garages being submitted to the staff. Respectfully Submitted, DAVID M. CLEMENTS ViLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL,,L�T PEANMG AND ZONING DEPARIMW Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN FROM: DAVID M., CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT. ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39-V-90, HUNTINGTON LTD. PARTNERSHIP LOCATION: 1200-1380 S. ELNUIURST ROAD (HUNTINGTON SQUARE APTS.) DATE: JUNE 8, 1990 This application was filed for an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development in order to construct garages at the Huntington Square Apartments. 1. A parking variation to allow 504 spaces or 1.55 spaces per unit, rather than the required 2 spaces per unit. 2. A variation of the 10 foot required perimeter setback to allow a 9 1/2 foot setback. E GE STAFF COMMEM The Fire Department commented that a clearance of 48" must be maintained from all fire hydrants. This may slightly reduce the final number of garages. Public Works notes that no part of the structures shall encroach on any existing easements. Inspection Services points out that detailed construction drawings will be necessary, including further information on curb and sidewalk replacement and grading plans. The Engineering Division is concerned that several of the garage structures may be placed over service connections for water and storm sewer. These are private utility connections to public mains and lines. The applicant should be aware that certain service connections should be rerouted to avoid such conflicts. PLANNM AND ZONM COMM NTS First, it should be noted that the variation of the 10 foot perimeter setback to 9 1/2 feet does not need to be reviewed. All garages are proposed to be built on a 10 foot setback, off of any public utility easements. Zoning Board of Appeal Gil Basnik, Chairman Page 2 Concerning the parking variation, staff notes that the parking legend on the site plan is not accurate. Actual numbers are as follows: -Number of living units: 324 -Total spaces required: 672 -Ten percent increase for PUD: 67 -Total parking requirement: 739 - Existing parking from 2 actual counts: 500 - Number of existing parking places lost due to garage construction: 99 - Number if garages proposed: 86 - Net loss due to garage construction: 13 - Revised parking count including garages: 487 Existing parking at Huntington Square is less than our current Ordinance requirement. Also, the original development plan for the project provided for 384 units and 384 parking spaces. Regardless of these various parking counts, the important thing to consider with this request is the actual parking demand at this apartment complex. The proposed garages eliminate 13 parking spaces, due to the size of the structures and the fact that they require more land area than a surface parking space. The petitioner has been asked to conduct a survey of vacant spaces in order to justify the request. Also, the staff is doing parking counts on several days. This information will be available at the public hearing. From all indications, the number of vacant spaces far exceeds the 13 spaces that are lost with the garage construction. This would point to demand for parking at less than the revised parking count of 487 spaces. The purpose of the garages is to improve the marketability of this rental community. Covered parking is an amenity that many people look for, and the garages could be a real asset for residents. The garages will be finished with face brick on all four sides. Sample photographs are enclosed. One resident noted that the Park District bike path is very near the garages. This resident indicated a concern about graffiti, and litter control on the back of the garages. The petitioner should address these concerns. DMC:hg -,4LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSF,,4,,T PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GILSASNIV, CHAIRMAN wAr FROM. DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA-38-SU-90, ZBA-39-V-90, HUNTINGTON LTD. PARTNERSHIP LOCATION: 1200-1380 SOUTH ELMHURST ROAD DATE: MAY 18, 19" This request involves an amendment to an existing Planned Unit Development, to allow garages to be constructed at Huntington Square Apartments. Upon review of this application, several Village Departments indicated a concern about existing utility lines, and if the proposed garages might be located over public and private utilities. In order to allow more time to look into these questions, staff asks the Zoning Board to continue the request to the Special Meeting of June 14. DMC:hg "VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W, FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA41-V-90, DONALD R. NOTTO LOCATION: 2016 HOPI LANE DATE: JUNE 27, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for a variation filed by Donald Notto of 2016 Hopi Lane. The application was filed in order to allow an existing circular driveway to be replaced, and to increase the maximum lot coverage in a required front yard from 35% to 40%. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 14, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Notto presented testimony in support of the request. The applicant stated that the original circular driveway was installed when the house was built in 1960. He hopes to replace the asphalt driveway with brick pavers, and needs the variation to allow the new driveway. Mr. Notto noted that there are other circular drives in the neighborhood, and his circular drive is necessary as a safety measure as Hopi Lane is a neighborhood collector street carrying higher volumes of traffic to River Road. The Zoning Board recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning Board believes that the existing circular driveway has not had an adverse impact on the neighborhood, and made reference to a letter from the property owner at 2014 Hopi supporting the request. The Zoning Board noted that the lot coverage variation was related to the circular driveway, and this minor variation would not cause stormwater run-off problems in this neighborhood. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote. the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the Village Board authorize variations to allow replacement of a circular drive, and to increase lot coverage from 35% to 40% in a front yard at 2016 Hopi Lane. DMC:hg for piiblrc Uf/fi%ieS �gKsr��S t(JtrG�S Bi -level Residence undcr can •L vc al cd .%lv 9 4b. 1968 #68-7-83/4 vrATV nit rtmmd MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 41-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETITIONER: Donald R. Notto SUBJECT PROPERTY: 2016 Hopi Lane PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 1990 REQUEST. The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.3016.A.1 so that a circular driveway maybe replaced. A second variation from the 35% maximum of Section 14.1102.A. is requested so that 40% of the front yard may be covered with impervious surface. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being an application for a variation to allow the replacement of an existing circular driveway, and a variation of the impervious lot surface coverage in the front yard of the home at 2016 Hopi Lane. Mr. and Mrs. Donald Notto introduced themselves to the Zoning Board. They indicated that they were the original owners of this home and that the circular drive had originally been installed in 1960. Mr. Notto indicated that the driveway was originally installed as a safety measure because Hopi Lane connects to River Road, and there is a high volume of traffic in front of the home- *He stated that the driveway is deteriorated and in need of replacement and that he would like to construct the new circular driveway out of brick pavers, and provide a more attractive front yard at his residence. To support the request, Mr. Notto stated that there are 6 circular driveways in the 1800 block of Hopi Lane and that he had talked with the Police Department, and this conversation had revealed that there were no accidents along this street in the past 8 years. ZBA-41-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report and stated that, as a general rule, the staff and the Zoning Board look more favorably on circular drives on busy arterial streets. Mr. Clements noted that Hopi Lane is a neighborhood collector and that perhaps there were not the traffic volumes on this street to justify circular drives, as has been done with past requests. However, Mr. Clements noted that this circular drive had been in place since the home was originally built in 1960, and that there did not seem to be any adverse impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Clements also made reference to the lot coverage variation and stated that this is a proposed increase of 5% from the 35% maximum. Mr. Clements pointed out that the petitioner could meet the lot coverage standard in the required front yard, if the circular drive were eliminated and a standard two -car driveway provided to the home. Mr. Clements suggested that the petitioner at least address this as an alternative. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request. Chairman Basnik asked how wide the proposed driveway was, and Mr. Clements indicated that the driveway was 13 feet wide. Mr. Basnik then read a letter into the record from Mr. George Stout, a neighbor and adjoining property owner, indicating no objection to the request. Mr. Cassidy stated that the lot coverage variation was relatively minor and that flooding is not a problem in this neighborhood. He also indicated that the brick driveway would be attractive. Mr. Brettrager pointed out that the lot is very wide and there is sufficient land area to accommodate the driveway. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Cassidy moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a circular driveway and a lot coverage variation in the required front yard to the Village Board for 2016 Hopi Lane. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, DAVID M. CLEMENTS `-'-ALIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPbiT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, 1111nots TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W, FROM: DAVID NL CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA41-V-", DONALD R. NOTTO LOCATION: 2016 HOPI LANE DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 REQVW The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.3016,A.1 so that a circular driveway may be replaced. A second variation from the 35% maximum of Section 14.1102.A is requested so that 40% of the front yard may be covered with impervious surface. VIL!AfzE S COhflffMS Engineering notes that the west portion of the driveway is close to an intersection. If a car is parked in the driveway, it might present a sight line problem. The property is not in the flood plain. Inspection Services comments that brick will be used for driveway approaches and the homeowner shall be notified that he is responsible for repair/removal/replacement of the brick if work is ever needed in the parkway. PI ANMG AND ZONING? NTS The applicant would like to replace an existing circular driveway at 2016 Hopi Lane. The asphalt driveway would be replaced with paver bricks. Because this is a complete driveway replacement, variations of all current requirements must be obtained. Staff notes that the circular driveway was installed when the house was built in 1968. At that time, a variation was not necessary for a circular driveway. From all indications, the existing circular drive has not had any negative impact. However, in the past, circular driveways have only been permitted on busy arterial streets, as a safety measure. There are no other circular driveways in this neighborhood. Concerning the lot coverage variation in the required front yard, this cannot really be reduced unless the circular driveway is eliminated. It is doubtful that this paving in the front yard has caused any flooding problems in this area. It seems that a normal two -car driveway would adequately serve the petitioner, and eliminate the need for the lot coverage variation. The petitioner should address the necessity of the circular drive, and why a normal two -car driveway would not be sufficient. DMC:hg 'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER fi1y� FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA42-V-90, IRENE B. SALA LOCATION: 107 WEST ORCHARD PLACE DATE: JUNE 27, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on an application for a variation filed by Irene Sala. The application was filed to allow a 16 1/2 foot wide one -car driveway rather than 15 foot; and a reduction of the 6 1/2 foot sideyard requirement to allow the driveway 1 1/2 feet from the lot line. The Zoning Board of appeals considered the request at their meeting of June 14, 1990. At the meeting, Ms. Sala stated that she would like to replace an existing driveway in the same location, and that variations are necessary to allow the driveway replacement. The Zoning Board recommends that the application be approved. The Zoning Board noted that the house immediately west has an identical driveway and reduced setback, so the proposed variations would have no adverse impact on this property. Members of the Zoning Board believed that these were minor variations, only necessary to allow the existing driveway to be replaced. Accordingly, by a 6-0 vote, the Zoning Board recommends that the application be approved DMC:hg P PLA SPLtT=Lc'VWL'VW L 9p M MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 42-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETITIONER: Irene B. Sala SUBJECT PROPERTY: 107 West Orchard Place PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 1990 REQUEST: The following is requested: Variations from Section 14.3016A3 so that a 16.5 foot wide driveway may be replacedand Section 14.1102.3 so that a 1.5 foot setback may be maintained for the driveway instead of 6.5 feet. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT: Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being a variation to permit a 16 1/2 foot wide driveway which would reduce the 61/2 foot required side yard to 11/2 feet at 107 Orchard Place. The petitioner, Irene Sala, introduced herself to the Zoning Board and stated that the existing asphalt driveway is deteriorated and in need of repair. She stated that she had filed a variation only to allow the existing driveway to be replaced by a new drive in exactly the same location. Mr. Clements summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and confirmed that the existing driveway is deteriorated. Mr. Clements further noted that the property immediately west of this residence has an identical driveway with a one -car garage and parking apron in a side yard. Based on this, Mr. Clements stated that he did believe that the applicant's request would have any adverse impact on the neighbor's property. ZBA-42-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was noted that the existing driveway had not seemed to cause any negative impact on the neighborhood, therefore, the new structure would be appropriate. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Lannon moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals recommend approval of a 16 1/2 foot driveway with a 11/2 foot side yard setback at 107 West Orchard Place. The motion was seconded by Mr. Brettrager. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, T - DAVID M. CLEMENT'S . _LLAGE OF MOUNT PEOSP, -,T PcwrrNll+rG AND ZONING DEPA TM"T Mount Prospect, I111nois TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W r FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA42-V-", IRENE B. SALA LOCATION: 107 WEST ORCHARD PLACE DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 REQUES The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.3016.jA.3 so that a 165 foot wide driveway may be replaced. A 15 foot driveway is permitted for a one -car garage. Also, a variation from Section 14.1102.B is requested so that a 1.5 foot setback may be maintained for the driveway instead of 6.5 feet. VILLAGE AF" COMMEMES Engineering is concerned that the new driveway must not alter the existing drainage pattern on public right-of-way or private property. Inspection Services states that no fill shall be placed along the side yard. I!IANNING ANDZ O :NTS Mrs. Sala would like to replace the existing driveway at her residence. 'Tire driveway is 16- 1/2 feet wide, and serves a one car garage. Because the applicant is constructing a new driveway, variations of current requirements are necessary. Staff notes that the existing driveway is deteriorated, and in need of repair. The driveway will be 1-1/2 feet from the side lot line, thus a variation of the required sideyard is necessary. It is important to note that the house immediately to the west has an identical driveway arrangement for a one -car garage. This would indicate that replacing the driveway is in character with the area, and would have no adverse effect on the neighbor's home. Based on these observations, the staff recommends approval of the request. DMC:hg '`-PILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPvCT PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT Mount Prospect, Illinois TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER W1 FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT: ZBA43-V-90, THOMAS GROENWALD LOCATION: 203 NORTH RUSSEL STREET DATE: JUNE 28, 1990 The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on an application for variations filed by Thomas Groenwald of 203 North Russel. The application was filed to allow a detached garage to be constructed 1.68 feet from the rear lot line, and 1.63 feet from the side lot line. The application also requests a variation of the 45% lot coverage standard to allow 47.5% lot coverage. The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of June 14, 1990. At the meeting, Mr. Groenwald presented testimony in support of the request. He indicated that an old deteriorated frame garage is on his property, and he would like to construct a new garage at the same location. Variations are necessary to permit the new garage in this location. Mr. Groenwald stated that, in this older neighborhood, there are many garages that do not meet current setback requirements, so the proposed garage will not alter the character of the neighborhood. The petitioner also noted that the proposed garage would encroach on a 5 foot easement, and he has obtained a waiver from Commonwealth Edison to permit the garage to encroach 2 feet onto the easement. He indicated that he is requesting this setback rather than 1.68 feet, after discussions with the utility company. The Zoning Board recommends that the application be approved. Members of the Zoning Board noted that it was reasonable to allow the new garage to be constructed in the same location as the existing garage, as there has been no adverse impact on the adjoining property, and there are other similar garages in the neighborhood. The Zoning Board also noted that the lot coverage variation is not really increased with this request as this is a replacement garage. Accordingly, by a 5-1 vote, the Zoning Board of Appeals recommends that the application be approved, subject to a rear setback of 3 feet. DMC:hg __o I i *-* 1 6 ww•4 1 I MIATES OF THE REGULAR MEETING -OF THE MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS ZBA CASE NO. 43-V-90 Hearing Date: June 14, 1990 PETITIONER: Thomas Groenwald SUBJECT PROPERTY: 203 North Russel Street PUBLICATION DATE: May 29, 1990 REQUEST- A variation from Section 14.102.8.2 to allow a side yard of 1.63 feet and a rear yard of 1.68 feet for a garage. Also requested is a variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow 47.5% impervious lot surface coverage. ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman Robert Brettrager Ronald Cassidy Peter Lannon Richard Pratt Michaele Skowron ZBA MEMBERS ABSENT- Lois Brothers OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None Chairman Basnik introduced this request as being variations to allow a new garage to be constructed at a 1.63 foot side yard, and 1.68 foot rear yard and to allow a 47.5% lot coverage rather than 45% as permitted by Code. Mr. Groenwald introduced himself to the Zoning Board of Appeals and stated that he has an existing frame garage that is over 50 years old and is deteriorating and in need of repair. He would like to remove the existing garage and place a new structure in exactly the same location. This location would place the new structure 1.68 feet from the rear lot line and 1.63 feet from the side lot line. Mr. Groenwald noted that this would be a variation of the 5 foot required setback. He indicated that he had done a survey of the immediate neighborhood and found that there were a significant number of garages built at less than the 5 foot setback. His survey indicated that there are approximately 30 detached garages in the area with non -conforming setbacks. He stated that there is no flooding in this neighborhood and so the reduced setback would not contribute to any flooding on the neighbor's property. He also indicated that he had contacted his neighbors and they had no objection to the request. Concerning the rear setback, Mr. Groenwald noted that there is a 5 foot utility easement provided for the overhead utilities. He stated he had contacted Commonwealth Edison and they had indicated that they would have no objection to the garage being constructed and maintain a 3 foot setback, which would be a 2 foot encroachment on the easement. Mr. Clements then summarized the staff report and indicated that the older frame garage on this property was deteriorating and in need of repair. Mr. Clements confirmed the A—,A43-V-90 June 14, 1990 Page 2 statements by Mr. Groenwald that there are many detached garages in this neighborhood at less than the 5 foot required side yard. However, Mr. Clements indicated a concern with allowing the garage to be constructed on the rear easement. Even if Commonwealth Edison had issued a waiver to permit the garage to be built at a 3 foot setback, there would still be some exposure for the property owner and that if Commonwealth Edison ever had to maintain the overhead lines, with damage to the garage, the utility company would not be liable, and the property owner would have to make those repairs. Considering that, Mr. Clements recommended that the garage be maintained at a 5 foot setback. He noted that this minor modification would not reduce much of the usable area of the petitioner's rear yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the request and it was noted that, if the utility company had no objections to the encroachment, then the Village should not object too strenuously, inasmuch as this would be a matter between the utility company and the property owner. Ms. Skowron indicated she was concerned about the garage encroaching on an easement and felt like this was not a good practice to be involved with. She was concerned about the overhead wires and the possibility that the wires could break due to an ice storm or heavy winds and come in contact with the garage. The Zoning Board generally discussed the request and it was believed that the 3 foot setback for the rear yard would be a good compromise in this application. There was also no objection to the reduced side yard or the lot coverage. The Zoning Board noted that the higher lot coverage is primarily due to the narrow lot size on this property. The lot is only 54 feet wide. There being no further discussion, Chairman Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Brettrager moved that the Zoning Board of Appeals approve setback variations for the garage subject to a 3 foot rear yard being maintained. The motion was seconded by Mr. Lannon. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Basnik NAYS: Skowron The motion was approved by a vote of 5-1. Ms. Skowron voted against the motion indicating that she believed the new garage should be located off of the easement. Chairman Basnik then asked for a motion on the lot coverage variation. Mr. Lannon moved that the variation be approved. The motion was seconded by Mr. Cassidy. Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Cassidy, Lannon, Pratt, Skowron, Basnik NAYS: None The motion was approved by a vote of 6-0. Respectfully Submitted, J". M , '*4� DAVID M. CLEMENT'S ALIAGE OF MOUNT PROSF—.T PLANNMG AND ZOMNG DEPARTNaM Mount Prospect, 1111nots TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN W-r— FROM: DAVID M. CLEAIENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING SUBJECT- ZBA43-V-90, THOMAS GROENWALD LOCATION- 203 NORTH RUSSEL STREET DATE: JUNE 7, 1990 REO The applicant requests a variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to allow a side yard of 1.63 feet and a rear yard of 1.68 feet for a garage. The applicant is also requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow 47.5% impervious lot surface coverage. BLIAGE STAFF COMMEM Engineering feels that the new garage should not be placed on an existing easement. According to Engineering, there are no Village utilities in the easement. Inspection Services specifies that no fill shall be placed in the side or rear yards. Inspection Services notes that the subdivision plat indicates an easement along the rear property line and all utility companies should issue waivers before the new garage is built. Also, if a portion of the driveway is gravel, then it should be surfaced. P The petitioner would like to remove an old frame garage and slab , and construct a new two -car garage at the same location. The existing gravel drive will be paved. The Zoning Ordinance requires a 5 foot rear and 5 foot sideyard for an accessory building. The new garage is proposed to be built at 1.69' from the rear lot line and 1.63' from the side lot line. Staff is concerned about the new garage being constructed on an existing 5' rear easement. There are overhead utility lines along the rear lot line, and the easement is necessary for access and maintenance. In reference to the sideyard, staff would prefer to see the sideyard increased to at least 2 112' to 3', to provide more open space around the structure, and more area for drainage. There are other garages in this neighborhood built at reduced setbacks. Concerning the lot coverage variation, this is a minor percentage variation, and is attributable to the smaller lot size at this location. Staff has no objection to the lot coverage variation, as the new garage will not increase run-off. The changes in the location of the proposed garage are minor, and should not reduce the usable rear yard at the petitioner's home. Staff recommends that the garage be relocated off of the easement, and at a 2 1/2' to 3' sideyard setback. JN Village of �,l cunt Prospect N Mount Prospect, Illinois Za INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 29, 1990 SUBJECT: SALE OF PROPERTY AT 443 WEST RAND ROAD Attached is a memorandum from Attorney Everette Hill indicating the methods that may be used by the Village for the disposition of the above-mentioned real estate. While Mr. Hill has recommended in the last paragraph the utilization of the third method, I strongly believe that the second method is the most ideal since there are at least two people that we know at this time that are interested in the property. I believe that utilizing the acceptance of bids and letting people know that there are others that are interest in the property would bring the best price to the Village for this parcel of land. HN FULTON DI ON JFD/rcw attachment GLASS, KILL, DALLMEYER & ROTH, LTD. M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Mr. John Dixon, Village Manager Village of Mt. Prospect FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr. and Michael M. Roth DATE: June 28, 1990 RE: Sale of 443 W. Rand Road Real Estate The Village may employ any of three methods for the sale or disposition of real estate. 1. The first method is found in Section 8.514 of the Village Code. Under that Section, the Village corporate authorities adopts an ordinance authorizing the sale of any real estate owned by the Village. The Board may direct that the sale be conducted by Village staff, by open or closed bidding; by public or private auction; or by listing the property with a local licensed real estate agency. The ordinance need be passed by only a majority of the corporate authorities and no notice of hearing is required. Section 8.514 goes on to provide that the ordinance must contain at least the following: "A. The names of the purchaser of the property; if a land trust, the names and addresses of all beneficiaries shall be disclosed, and if a corporation, names and addresses of its officers and directors shall be listed; B. The legal description of the property; C. The purchase price of the property; D. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village that the purchase price to be paid for the property is fair, reasonable and just; E. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village that the property is longer necessary, appropriate or required for municipal use; and ATTORNEYS AT LAW EvERETTE M. HILL, JR. 899 SKOKIE BOULEVARD OF COUNSEL SUZANNE B DALLXEYEIR NORTHBROOK, ILLINOIS 60062 BRADLEY M. GLASS' MICHAEL M. ROTH (708)584.8910 PAUL A. TAwzILLO FAX (708).564 3442 `"ADMITTED WISCONSIN B" M E M 0 R A N D U M TO: Mr. John Dixon, Village Manager Village of Mt. Prospect FROM: Everette M. Hill, Jr. and Michael M. Roth DATE: June 28, 1990 RE: Sale of 443 W. Rand Road Real Estate The Village may employ any of three methods for the sale or disposition of real estate. 1. The first method is found in Section 8.514 of the Village Code. Under that Section, the Village corporate authorities adopts an ordinance authorizing the sale of any real estate owned by the Village. The Board may direct that the sale be conducted by Village staff, by open or closed bidding; by public or private auction; or by listing the property with a local licensed real estate agency. The ordinance need be passed by only a majority of the corporate authorities and no notice of hearing is required. Section 8.514 goes on to provide that the ordinance must contain at least the following: "A. The names of the purchaser of the property; if a land trust, the names and addresses of all beneficiaries shall be disclosed, and if a corporation, names and addresses of its officers and directors shall be listed; B. The legal description of the property; C. The purchase price of the property; D. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village that the purchase price to be paid for the property is fair, reasonable and just; E. A finding by the President and Board of Trustees of the Village that the property is longer necessary, appropriate or required for municipal use; and GLASS, HILL, DALLMEYER & ROTH, LTD. Mr. John Dixon June 28, 1990 Page 2 F. The real estate contract for the purchase of property." It is our opinion that this Section contemplates that if the property is not publicly listed or sold at a public or private auction, then it must be sold pursuant to bids. While the Village Code deviates from the methods permitting the sale of real estate under the Illinois Revised Statutes, it is our opinion that Mount Prospect, as a home rule municipality is no, bound by those statutes and may follow its own ordinances. 2. The second method that the Village may employ for the sale of realty is authorized under Illinois Revised Statutes, c. 24, Sections 1176-1, 2 and 3. Under this method, the corporate authorities, upon finding that certain real estate is no longer necessary, appropriate, required for the use of, profitable to or for the best interests of the Village, may authorize the sale of that real estate by ordinance, after advertising for bids. Before the corporate authorities may make the sale, notice of the proposal to sell must be published once a week for three successive weeks, the first of which must be at least 30 days before the date provided in the notice for the opening of bids. The bids may be opened only at the regular meeting of the corporate authorities; and the corporate authorities may accept the high bid or any other bid to be determined in the best interests of the Village by a vote of 3/4ths of the corporate authorities then holding office. However, the corporate authorities may by majority vote of those holding office, reject any and all bids. The ordinance awarding the bids and directing the sale must specify the location of the real estate, the use thereof and such conditions with respect to further use of the real "estate, if any, as the corporate authorities deem necessary and desirable to the public interest. 3. The third method municipalities may employ for the sale of real estate is authorized under Illinois Revised Statutes, c. 24, Section 76-4.1. This method may be employed if the real estate is "surplus public real estate". The term "surplus" public real estate is not defined in the statutes and we find no court decisions interpreting the term. However, our Webster and oxford Dictionarys define the term "surplus" as meaning "excess", or "that left over after what is used". It is our opinion that 443 W. Rand Road would qualify as surplus real estate because it is no longer necessary, appropriate, useful, profitable to or for the best interests of the Village. GLASS, HILI., DALLMEYER &--POTH, LTD. Mr. John Dixon June 28, 1990 Page 3 Under Section 11-76-4.1, the corporate authorities authorize the sale of surplus public real estate by resolution. First, the Village must determine the value of the real estate by a written MAI certified appraisal. Then, by a vote of 3/4ths of the corporate authorities then holding office the Village may accept any contract proposal determined by them to be in the best interest of the Village, so long as the contract proposal is at a price at least 80% of the appraised value. The resolution may direct the sale by the Village staff or by listing with a local licensed real estate agency. The resolution must be published at the first opportunity following passage in a newspaper published in the municipality and must also contain pertinent information concerning the size, use and zoning of the real estate and the terms of the sale. Because the Village already has a known buyer at an acceptable price, we recommend that the third method, authorized under Illinois Revised Statutes, c. 24, Sec. 11-76-4.1, be employed. While by using this method the Village will incur the cost of an appraisal, it will not pay broker's fees and the Village will not be required to sell pursuant to bids. 17RealEs.Mem Village of' lount Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois a INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MX[OR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 26, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR SALE OF VILLAGE -OWNED PROPERTY At the Committee of the Whole meeting, I indicated there has been an interest in the purchase of property that the Village owns in the Prospect Meadows Subdivision; in particular, an old well site that is no longer utilized by the Village. Attached is an Ordinance authorizing the disposal of Village property. There are very specific procedures that need to be followed in the sale of land. The Ordinance authorizes the Village to proceed with the specific provisions in the Statutes allowing us to dispose of property. JFD/rcw attachment CAF/ ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY OWNED BY THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT 443 WEST RAND ROAD WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the property hereinafter is not longer necessary, appropriate, useful, profitable to, or for the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect; and WHEREAS, the corporate authorities find it in the best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect to sell the real estate legally described as follow: Lot 4 in Block 3, in Prospect Meadows, a Subdivision of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian according to plat recorded December 9, 1949 as Document 14692921 all in Cook County, Illinois said property being commonly known as 443 East Rand Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: SECTION ONE: That a sale of the property described in SECTION TWO hereof be and the same is hereby directed to be made under terms and conditions meeting the approval of the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, in accordance with the statutes of the State of Illinois. SECTION TWO: That the Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect be and is hereby directed to cause a public notice advertising for bids for such property to be published once each week for three successive weeks in The Daily Herald, and said notice shall be in substantially the following form: SALE OF LAND NOTICE TO BIDDERS Notice is hereby given that the Village Manager of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, will receive bids at the Office of the Village Manager, 100 South Emerson Street, until 5:00 P.M. on August 7, 1990. The Bid Proposals for the purchase of certain land presently owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, will be opened and publicly read at the regular meeting of the Village Board, beginning at 7:30 P.M. on August 7, 1990. Any such proposal shall be in the form of a standard real estate contract form accompanied by earnest money in cash, certified check, or cashier's check in the amount of 10% of the offer (bid proposal). This particular vacant parcel, commonly known as 433 West Rand Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois, is zoned for single family residential development and is legally described as follows: Lot 4 in Block 3, in Prospect Meadows, a Subdivision of the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 27, Township 42 North, Range 11 East of the Third Principal Meridian according to plat recorded December 9, 1949 as Document 14692921 all in Cook County, Illinois. 433 East Rand Road Page 2 of 2 Prospective bidders and interested persons may review the location notes at the Village Hall, 100 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, in the office of the Village Clerk. The Village of Mount Prospect reserves the right to reject any and all bids. By order of the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect. Gerald L. Farley, Mayor 11 SECTION THREE: That bids received in response to said advertisement for bids shall be opened by the corporate authorities at their regular meeting of the Village Board beginning at 7:30 P.M. on August 7, 1990 at the Senior Citizen Center, 50 South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect. SECTION FOUR: That within fifteen (15) days after the bid opening and the successful bidder has been determined and that bid accepted, the Village shall return the earnest money, by certified mail or in person, to the unsuccessful bidders. SECTION FIVE: That within thirty (30) days after a bid is accepted, the successful bidder shall tender to the Village the consideration specified in the bid accepted and upon receipt of such consideration the President and Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect shall thereupon cause the necessary legal papers to be issued in the name of the Village of Mount Prospect to the successful bidder for the subject real estate. The corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect will furnish a warranty deed with a good and merchantable title. SECTION SIX: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its passage, approval, and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law. AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1990. Gerald L. Farley Village President ATTEST: Carol A. Fields Village Clerk VILLAGE OF MOUNT•• ILLINr�ouo�r . •PBitSPECi !b INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON FROM: FIRE CHIEF EDWARD M. CAVELLO DATE: June 25, 1990 SUBJECT. SELF CONTAINED BREATHING APPARATUS Sealed bids were opened on June 13, 1990, at 10:00 a.m, for the proposed purchase of five (5) MSA Self Contained Breathing Apparatus with spare tanks and brackets. The bid results are as follows: RIME BID EEC, Air One $11,350.00 Mao Fire & Safety $12,395.00 Mine Safety Appliance $13,071.75 Interstate of Milwaukee $15,264.50 These SCBA's will continue to upgrade current stock. Funds are available in the 90/91 Budget on Page 104, under Account Code 1- 042-02-8011. I recommend the purchase from the low bidder, Air One. Edward M. Cavello Fire Chief EMC/mah B* M*_ ut eMount 'Prospect Public Works Department MY T= arY LSA INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director Public Works DATE: June 27, 1990 SLTBJ: Sealed bid- Parking Fee Collection Boxes Sealed bids were opened this date for eight (8) parking fee collection boxes for use in commuter lots near the Chicago North- western Railroad Station. These are replacement boxes plus an additional box for those commuters parking on East Prospect Avenue. The only bid received was from Southern Specialties Corporation on Model SSA III "PP" for $10,333.20. It is recommended that we add to the base bid some custom signage and bracketry costing $970.00 for a total contract price to not exceed $11,303.20. Delivery is promised within 45 days after notice of award. On page 194 under account code 46-073-03-8731 there is $10,000 allocated for the puchase of collection boxes. Herbert Weeks MLB/LA C: Carol Fields C: Bobbie Wintercorn Mount Prospect Public Works Department INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: Village Manager FROM: Director of Public Works DATE: June 27, 1990 SUBJ: Sealed bid - Removal of underground fuel tank On June 27, 1990 sealed bids were requested for the removal of a underground 3000 gallon capacity fuel oil tank. This tank was installed in 1975 and is located near the SW corner of the Vil- lage Hall underneath the parking lot. There were seven invita- tional bids sent our for this contract and only one response was received. I recommend acceptance of the only bid received from the Peter Hartmann Company in the amount of $8,200.00. In the current budget on page 149 under account code 1-071-02-8306 there is $10,000.00 allocated for this removal work. The bid price includes removal of any petroleum product left in the tank, removal of the tank, bring in proper backfill and restore parking area, walkways, and landscaping to their origi- nal condition. The contractor is also required to secure the necessary EPA permits to allow excavation. It is projected that this process may take 4 to 6 weeks after application. Prior to the Village purchasing the Village Hall building it was owned by the Mount Prospect Bank and during the time they owned it the heating system used fuel oil to fire the burners. The original tank was leaking and was replaced in 1975 with the existing 3000 gallon tank. Since the late 70's the only use it has had was for running an emergency generator and with this minimal use the fuel is either jelled, the suction pipes are leaking, or they are blocked in some manner. For the past sever- al years we keep a 55 gallon barrel of diesel fuel in the build- ing to operate the generator. My biggest concern is that our records do not show whether any excess contaminated soils were removed from the excavation be- fore the replacement tank was installed. Current EPA regula- tions on handling of contaminated soils may require additional soils to be hauled away as special waste material if sampling proves negative. As this is an unknown factor it is not includ- ed in the base bid price and would have to be treated as an extra to the contract. Herbert Weeks MLB/LA C: Carol Fields C: Bobbie Wintercorn Village of I%,-.junt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois; INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER FROM: JOHN BURG, ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER RE: VIDEO EQUIPMENT SERVICE AND MAINTENANCE CONTRACT DATE: JUNE 29, 1990 ROSCOR originally installed the video equipment, and over the years the Village has had a service contract with ROSCOR which included cleaning and inspection. The contract which just expired was $2,200.00. Repairs this past year were $1,453.00 for a grand total of $3,653.00. Due to the age of the equipment (5 years) it was felt a service and maintenance contract would be good insurance. The Village received two quotes. The ROSCOR quote for $4,200.00 includes service, repair, parts and labor on all equipment except for video heads, camera tubes and camera control units which will be replaced at 50% of the manufacturer's list price. Swiderski provided two options. The $4,199 Swiderski option corresponds to the ROSCOR service contract which is $2,200.00. The Swiderski option two for $8,599.00 is similar to the ROSCOR bid of $4,200.00. However, the ROSCOR proposal provides much broader coverage and few restrictions. The ROSCOR quote is $547.00 more than the amount spent for service and maintenance last year. However, one major repair could easily cost more. Since ROSCOR knows our equipment and has provided good service, I would recommend approval of their contract in the amount of $4,200.00. John Burg Assistant Village Manager JB/caf .Mount Prospect G.—mment Access Charms! MEMO TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager , FROM: Cheryl L. Pasalic, Cable TV Administrator DATE: June 27, 1990 RE: Video Equipment Maintenance & Service Contract As requested, I have investigated the matter of service and maintenance contracts for our video equipment further. After obtaining two quotes, I would still recommend awarding the contract to ROSCOR due to 'low bid, more comprehensive coverage, and prior service. ROSCOR's quote is comparable to Swiderskils Option 2 quote. As you can see, there is a difference of over X, The major differences in the contracts are that ROSCOR will provide 71 service and maintenance under the contract at no additional charge, but Swiderski may tack on labor and repair charges if done at different times. In addition, I feel the ROSCOR contract is more flexible and to our advantage in terms of conditions and coverage. ROSCOR installed our equipment and is therefore totally familiar with any particular quirks or problems. As you are aware, the majority of our equipment was purchased from ROSCOR. The following is a comparison of the quotes received: ROSCOR Price - $4,200.00 - includes service, repair, parts, and labor on all equip. except for video heads, camera tubes, and camera control units which will be replaced at 50 % manufacturers list price. All "in -shop" service at no additional cost. - free loaner equipment when available - response within 48 hours - Six maintenance calls per year to include cleaning and normal maintenance. - Maintenance during regular business hours unless otherwise arranged. SWIDERSKI Option 1 - Price $4,199.00 - includes service on equipment on a time and material basis with all "in -shop" repairs at 20% off of the current labor rate of $75.00 and parts at cost plus 15%. - No loaner equipment, but discount rental rate at 25% off. - response within 24 hours - Six maintenance calls per year to include cleaning and normal maintenance. - A yearly maintenance on all VCR's - Maintenance only between 8 am and 4:30 pm on weekdays & non - holidays. All other week -day maintenance will be done at $37.50 per hour. Week- end and holidays will be charged at $75.00 per hour with 4 hr. min. - New purchases will be serviced on time and material basis. Village of Mount Prcscec-1 . 7eievisicn ?rcduc-icn Center 50 S. Emerscn =-Tscec,. 11mcis -30056 - 70&392-,3000 ext. 267 Page 2 Option 2- Price $8,599.00 - includes all features of option 1 and changes the service provisions to the following: - includes unlimited shop/field service with the exception of covering replacement of video heads, camera tubes, batteries, and camera control units. - service/maintenance outside of normal business hours would be charged at $37.50 per hour, and weekend or holidays at $75.00 per hour. Village of ",-,'cunt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILI AGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 27, 1990 SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS TO APPEAL TO ILLINOIS SUPREME COURT IN THE MATTER CONCERNING THE DISCONNECT CASE As we have discussed in the past, I am requesting that we authorize our attorneys to Appeal to the Illinois Supreme Court the matter concerning Disconnection of property generally south of Algonquin Road on the east side of Busse Road. JFD/rcw Village of ,-,cunt Prospect 'Mount Prospect, Illinois.ws <, INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 26, 1990 SUBJECT: FINAL PAYOUT REQUEST OF BAXTER AND WOODMAN FOR ENGINEERING WORK ON GEORGE/ALBERT RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT In early 1988, the Village entered into an agreement with Baxter and Woodman Engineers for the construction engineering of the George/Albert Streets improvements. At the time we entered into the agreement, it was estimated that the cost for engineering services would be $63,000. Since that time, from construction to the end of completion of construction, there were several matters that caused us to utilize more engineering services than originally estimated. Engineers have documented requests for an additional $16,630.76. After negotiations with engineers, I am recommending an amount of $11,467 which would bring their initial contract which was approved at $63,000 to $74,467. Of this amount, we received a payment from Northern Illinois Gas Company for sod payment along the right-of-way for $7,100. We also received a payment from the contractor for delay in completing the project by nine days at a penalty of $210 per day for another amount of $1,890 and we also received from the contractor a payment for work rendered by our Public Works Department for $855. We have received $9,845 in total payments by other parties for this contract meaning that there is an additional amount of $1,622 that would be needed to pay for the negotiated engineering service costs. There were three items, in particular, that delayed the project. One, was a delay by Northern Illinois Gas Company who decided once construction was started that they needed to replace individual gas lines along both of the streets. It was not anticipated that this work would be needed or necessary, however, once the construction started, Northern Illinois Gas Company started having problems with their lines and determined that it was in the best interest of the residents as well as Northern Illinois Gas Company to replace all of the lines in that area. This gave the contractor an opportunity to pull off the job and go to another job and delay the work. There was a second delay on getting the sewer sub -contractor to come back to complete the work before surface work could be completed which caused further delay. At the end of the project, there were innumerable amounts of calls and complaints by a number of parties who lived in the area to review some very detailed concerns. As you will recall, this Special Service Area passed by the slimmest of margins and there were a number of people that had a number of complaints and concerns throughout the entire project. Most of those were handled by the engineer although Village staff was also involved in the servicing of these complaints. I feel that the new contract amount is a reasonable negotiated amount and would recommend that the Village Board increase the contract for Baxter and Woodman Engineering Services from $63,000 to $74,467. This will close out the entire George/Albert Reconstruction project. 'r JOHN FULTON DIXN JFD/rcw VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT MAINTENANCE PROJECT: CHAPMAN SUBDIVISION LOCATION: S.E. CORNER OF LONNOUIST AND ROUTE 63 DATE: JUNE 20, 1990 TEO ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVAL PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL rm- INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL ric - PUBLIC IXPROVXMX —XT8 FOR ACCEPTANC By V WATER MAIN: 230 FT. 2" SIZE SANITARY SEWER:. 240 FT. 811 SIZE STORM SEWER: 370 FT. 1211 SIZE ROADWAYS: N/A SIDEWALKS: 1.350 SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS: N/A STREET LIGHTS: YES # 1 PARKWAY TREES: YES # 4 PARKWAY LANDSCAPING 375 S,Y. SOD RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS NZ,& ENGINEER CLERK CLERK, ENGINEER PLANNING & ZONING PUB.WKS.DIR. WATER MAIN: N/A FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER:— NZA FT. SIZE STORM SEWER: N/A FT. SIZE ROADWAY: PARKING LOTS: -SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING: RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS: APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19_. VILLAGE BOARD ACCEPTANCE OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT AND/OR PRIVATE IMPROVEMENT MAINTENANCE �ti mimm.Two DATE: ME 21, 1990 YES NO ENGINEERING DRAWINGS APPROVED pl.p- ENGINEER PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECEIVED: call CLERK PLAT OF SUBDIVISION RECORDED: CLERK AS BUILT PLANS REVIEWED AND APPROVED: pf— ENGINEER ZONING CRITERIA MET(LANDSCAPE PLANTING APPROVAL PLANNING & ZONING PUBLIC WORKS APPROVAL PUB.WKS.DIR. INSPECTION SERVICES APPROVAL INSP.SERV.DIR. ICD PUBLIC IXRRQygX=$ FOR ACCEPTAM BY eMas WATER MAIN: 690 FT. 200 FT. 1211 811 SIZE SANITARY SEWER: 651 FT, 125 FT. 8_611 SIZE STORM SEWER: 484 FT. -79 FT.- 474 FT. 3611, 18". 2111 SIZE ROADWAYS: 600 FT SIDEWALKS: 2,500 SQ.FT. STREET REGULATORY SIGNS I STREET LIGHTS YES # 2 PARKWAY TREES NO # PARKWAY LANDSCAPING COMPLETED RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS — N/A WATER MAIN FT. SIZE SANITARY SEWER FT. SIZE STORM SEWER FT. SIZE ROADWAY PARKING LOTS SQ.YDS. LANDSCAPING RETENTION/DETENTION AREAS APPROVED BY THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, THIS DAY OF , 19_. I Village of,-'' cunt Prospect Mount Prospect, Illinois INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN FULTON DIXON FROM: ASSISTANT VILLAGE MANAGER DATE: JUNE 29, 1990 SUBJECT: AGREEMENT BETWEEN VILLAGE AND PARK DISTRICT Attached is a copy of the Agreement between the Village and the Mount Prospect Park District to provide Police protection at the Park District properties. At the Tuesday meeting, Tom Tayler raised a question about a change in the law which for years had prevented the Park District from hiring their own enforcement personnel. I discussed this issue with Chief Pavlock. There is no law that prohibits the Park District from hiring enforcement personnel. However, the potential liability is the real stumbling block. Since the Village has an Agreement with the Park District for Police protection, the Village could be held liable for actions of the Park District enforcement officers. There is no certified training program in the State of Illinois for Park personnel necessary to enforce the dog ban. It would be essential to hire people with the proper background and training. The possible options would be to: 1. Hire off-duty Police Officers at $19 per hour. 2. Hire private security. 3. Form their own security detail with retired Police Officers (the Des Plaines Park District hired one). Because of the Village's potential liability, the Agreement with the Park District would have to be modified to ensure that any liability related to the enforcement of the dog ban would be assumed by the Park District. With regard to hiring the proper personnel, in the situation where a ticket must be issued, Chief Pavlock recommends at a minimum psychological testing and training equivalent to what the Community Service Officers must undergo. Where an arrest is necessary, full Police training would be indicated. All of the above options would be expensive, but a lawsuit could be far more costly. JPB/rcw attachment (?"(, JOHN P. BURG