HomeMy WebLinkAbout3762_001Next Ordinance No. 4196 VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Resolution No. 25-90 1
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date an, JUNE 19, 1990
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior Citizen Center June 15, 1990
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floro8
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Busse
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, June 5, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PRESENTATIONS:
1. Police officer Joseph Belmonte
2. James Quinn, James Weeks, Michael Mueller,
Dan Griggs, Michael Allred for their efforts
to save a victim of a traffic accident.
B. Presentation from Governor's Task Force
on Occupant Protection - Seat Belt Safety
C. A RESOLUTION HONORING JACK KEEFER, GRAND
MARSHALL OF THE 1990 JULY 4TH PARADE IN
MOUNT PROSPECT (Exhibit A)
D. A RESOLUTION NOTING THE PASSING OF
FRANK BIERMANN (Exhibit B)
E. Request for Class 11R11 liquor license for a
Chinese restaurant in the Brentwood Square
Shopping Center, Wolf & Kensington Roads.
F. Appointments
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 28-Z-90, 29 -SU -90, 30-•V-90. 720 E. Rand Road
1. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE AS IT
PERTAINS TO PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
720 EAST RAND ROAD
This Ordinance rezones the subject property
from B-3 to B-4. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
IX.
2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN
AS 720 EAST RAND ROAD
This Ordinance grants a Special Use to
permit a drive-thru restaurant 1,629 square
feet in size. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 5-1. (Exhibit D)
3. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 720 E. RAND ROAD
This Ordinance grants variations to allow
* 13.51 front yard, instead of the required 301;
* 31 side yard, instead of the required 101; a
51 rear yard instead of the required 201; and to
waive the required 121 x 351 loading space. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these variations by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit E)
4. Plat of Subdivision
B. ZBA 34-V-90, 404 North Prospect Manor
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 404 NORTH PROSPECT MANOR
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow a 2-1/2
foot side yard setback, instead of the required
5 feet, in order to construct a garage. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit F)
C. ZBA 37-V-90, 105 North Waverly Place
lst reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 105 N. WAVERLY PLACE
This Ordinance grants a variation to allow an
impervious lot surface coverage of 57%, instead
of the permitted 45%, in order to construct a
wooden deck. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote of
6-0. (Exhibit G)
D. ZBA 25-A-90, Text Amendments
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED
SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14 ENTITLED "ZONING
ORDINANCE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amends the definitions to better
define permitted obstructions in yards. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these amendments by votes of 6-0. (Exhibit H)
E. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE CREATING CHAPTER 15
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AS THE
"LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE" (Exhibit J)
NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 31-V-90, Northwest Assembly of God Church,
1400 East Kensington Road
The Petitioner is requesting variations from the
parking standards to reduce the number of required
spaces from 588 to 512 and to permit a lot
coverage of 61%, rather that the permitted 35%.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
denying these requests by -a vote of 2-5.
B. A RESOLUTION STATING THE INTENT OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT TO MEET THE FAIR HOUSING ACT OF 1988,
AS AMENDED, AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY
RESIDENCE LOCATION ACT OF 1989 (Exhibit K)
C. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL, INC.
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROGRAM (Exhibit L)
D. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL, INC.
BOXWOOD SUMMER PROGRAM (Exhibit M)
E. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL, INC.
BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM (Exhibit N)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN
AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL BUDGET FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1989/90 (Exhibit 0)
B. Proposal from Donohue & Associates to prepare
schematic design for proposed Public Safety
Building.
C. Status Report
D. Bids:
1. Street sweeping machine
2. Shared -Cost sidewalk program
3. Towing Contract
4. Ambulance Chassis
5. Boxwood Drive improvement
E. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING TRANSFER OF COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR THE BOXWOOD
DRIVE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (Exhibit P)
F. Request to change consultant's contract relative
to the Boxwood Drive improvement to include
inspections.
XI. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
(TRAFFIC CODE)
This Ordinance creates a one way street, northbound
for Boxwood Drive and amends those Sections of the
Traffic Code affected by this change. It also
changes the permitted area for parking from the east
side of the street to the west side. (Exhibit Q)
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JUNE S, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
$1,209,132
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
Community Development Block Grant Fund
ROLL CALL
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
29,936
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
428,056
Parking System Revenue Fund
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Risk Management Fund
-
Trustee Mark Busse
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
Trustee Leo Floros
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
3,101
Trustee George Van Geem
(arrived late)
Absent:
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
-
Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
The invocation
was given by Mayor Farley.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Escrow Deposit Fund
Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
APPROVE
to approve the
minutes of the regular meeting of
MINUTES
the Mayor and Board of Trustees held May 15, 1990.
Upon roll call:
Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Farley
Nays: None
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$1,209,132
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
-
Community Development Block Grant Fund
8,366
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
29,936
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
428,056
Parking System Revenue Fund
7,656
Risk Management Fund
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
3,101
Special Service Area Const. #5
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
-
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
-
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
75,331
Police Pension Fund
59,829
Firemen's Pension Fund
41,591
Benefit Trust Fund
-
$1,992,296
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, FArley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to accept the financial report dated April 30, 1990,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 2 - June 5, 1990
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
SISTER CITY
Mayor Farley introduced Adelaide Thulin, Chairman
POSTER AWARD
of the Sister City Program. The Sister City Program
AWARD
recently sponsored a Poster Contest and Brent Reese,
a 2nd grade student at Fairview Elementary School was
the winner.
BUSSE SCHOOL
Don Harmon, 16 North William Street, stated that the
PARKING
redesigned parking stalls on Henry Street in front of
the former Busse School property is still causing a
CERTIFICATES
traffic hazard. Mr. Harmon also noted that paved area
OF MERIT
that was to be used as off-street parking is not being
used.
Trustee Van Geem arrived at this point in the meeting.
CONSTITUTION
John Xetzenthin, Chairman of the Constitution Bi -
BI -CENTENNIAL
centennial Commission, stated that a ceremony will take
PROCLAMATIONS:
place at 3 PX on July 4th, at the conclusion of the
FLAG DAY
parade, to acknowledge the on-going Constitution Bi -
SHRINERS WEEK
Centennial celebration.
SHRUBS IN
Dave and Jill Tach6y, 1310 Ironwood Drive, requested
PARKWAY
relief from the determination of the Public Works
Department that their Blue Spruce must be trimmed four
EARL L. SUTTER
feet up from the ground. The Public Works Department
had originally required the tree to be trimmed six feet
up from the ground.
Mr. Tachey stated that it was their opinion that this
tree does not present a potential hazard, as presented
by Public Works. 'He also stated that he would be
willing to take out additional insurance and assume
liability, since that was a concern previously
expressed by the Mayor.
Mayor Farley asked Mr. Hill, an attorney for the
Village, if such an insurance rider would be acceptable
and Mr. Hill stated that in his opinion it would not
be acceptable.
Mayor Farley stated that the Board would rely on the
decision of the administration and the only other
recourse for the homeowner would be to pursue the
matter in a court of law.
Page 2 - June 5, 1990
MAYOR'S REPORT
FINANCIAL
Mayor Farley noted that the Village has received an
REPORTING
award for excellence in financial reporting from the
AWARD
Government Financial officers Association (GFOA),
noting that the award was a result of the efforts of
David Jepson, Finance Director. mayor Farley presented
the award to Mr. Jepson and suggested that it would be
appropriate for the plaque to be hung in Mr. Jepson's
office.
CERTIFICATES
Mayor Farley stated that due to the fast action of
OF MERIT
several members of the staff,.the life of a patron of
the Senior Center was saved. Mayor Farley presented
Certificates of Merit to Jan Abernethy, Peggy Flory,
Iry Stark and Paul Dowd who administered CPR which
saved the gentleman's life.
PROCLAMATIONS:
Mayor Farley proclaimed June 14, 1990 as Flag Day
FLAG DAY
in the Village.-
SHRINERS WEEK
Mayor Farley also proclaimed June 30 - July 6 as
Shriners Week in the Village, acknowledging the many
contributions of this organization to the residents of
the community.
EARL L. SUTTER
Mayor Farley presented a Resolution that acknowledged
Page 2 - June 5, 1990
the many contributions of Earl L. Sutter, Superintendent
of School District 57.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to consider an item not listed on the agenda.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved RES.NO. 24-90
for passage of Resolution No. 24-90
A RESOLUTION ACKNOWLEDGING THE MANY
CONTRIBUTIONS OF EARL L. SUTTER UPON
HIS RETIREMENT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem,
Farley
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Due to the fact that this Resolution was a surprise
for Mr. Sutter, Mayor Farley expressed his appreciation
to Sara Bryant who assisted in getting Mr. Sutter to
this meeting. Ms. Bryant is a teacher at Lions Park
Elementary School.
A request was presented for a contribution of $2,000 to FIGHT BACK
the "Fight Back" Program, sponsored by School District PROGRAM
214 in an effort to combat substance abuse. DONATION
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to authorize the expenditure of $2,000 to School
District 214 for the Fight Back Program.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem.
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mayor Farley noted that 1992 will be the 75th DIAMOND
anniversary of the incorporation of the Village. FEST
In order to provide a celebration of this anniversary
Mayor Farley asked that the Board concur with his
recommendation to appoint Lillian Floros as
Chairman of the Diamond Fest Committee.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to concur with the appointment of Lil Floros as
Chairman of the Diamond Fest Committee.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mayor Farley made no appointments.
NEW BUSINESS
Pate Subdivision, 1000 Wildwood Lane
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that PATE'S
would authorize a Recapture for utilities and SUBDIVISION
public improvements for properties on Wildwood Lane. RECAPTURE
This Ordinance had been deferred in order to
finalize the details involved with this recapture.
Page 3 - June 5, 1990
Mr. Ruud, attorney for the Petitioner, recommended
revisions to the proposed Recapture Ordinance. Mr.
Hill, representing the Village, concurred with the
recommended changes.
Mr. Labuz, 1215 Wildwood Lane, asked questions
regarding the Recapture Ordinance as presented as well
as the revisions presented at this meeting.
The owner of Lot 4, being subject to the proposed
Recapture, also asked questions as to the actual cost
that he would be required to pay as a result of the
proposed Recapture.
Idyl Nipper, 1220 E. Cardinal, also spoke on this
subject.
ORD.NO. 4193 Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4193, as amended
AN ORDINANCE PRORATING THE COST OF
CONSTRUCTION OF WATERMAIN AND STREET IN
WILDWOOD LANE IN THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 24-V-90 ZBA 24-V-90, 1631 Oneida Lane
1631 ONEIDA LN An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant a variation to allow a service walkway 5'
4" in width, instead of the permitted 31. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this request by
a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4194 Trustee.Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4194
.AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A'VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1631 ONEIDA LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 26-V-90 ZBA 26-V-90, 2234 West Lincoln Street
2234 W.LINCOLN An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant variations to allow a circular driveway,
resulting in 2 driveways on the lot, and to allow a
driveway width of 32 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting the requests in ZBA 26-V-90 by a
vote of 5-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 - June 5, 1990
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for ORD.NO. 4195
passage of ordinance No. 4195
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2234 W. LINCOLN STREET
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 28-Z-90, 29 -SU -90, 30-V-90, 720 East Rand Road
ZBA 28-Z-90
Ordinances were presented for first reading that
ZBA 29 -SU -90
rezone the subject property from B-3 to B-4 to
ZBA 30-V-90
permit a fast food restaurant; a Special Use to
720 E.RAND RD
permit a drive-thru fast food restaurant 1,629
square feet in size; variations to allow a 13.51
front yard, instead of the required 101, a 31 side
yard, instead of the required 101, a 51 rear yard,
instead of the required 201; and to waive the
required 121 x 351 loading space. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended granting the requests for
rezoning and variations by votes of 6-0 and to grant
the Special Use by a vote of 5-1.
These Ordinances will be presented June 19th for second
readings.
The annual financial report of the Mount Prospect
LIBRARY
Public Library for 1989/90 was presented.
FINANCIAL
REPORT
Mayor Farley acknowledged receipt of the annual
financial report and instructed the Clerk to
place the report in the official files of the
Village.
NEW BUSINESS
ZBA 32 -SU -90, Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center ZBA 32 -SU -90
The Petitioner is requesting a special use to allow GOLF & BUSSE
a day care facility in the new shopping center
located on the northwest corner of Golf & Busse
Roads. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this special use by a vote of 5-2.
The Petitioner explained that the facility would
provide care for up to 60 children ages 2 through 5 and
possibly some children after school. The children
would utilize the open space and playground
equipment at Clearwater Park, immediately north of
the facility. It was also noted that while the
special use is required from the Village, the final
approval is from the State of Illinois.
Trustee Van Geem expressed his concern relative to
the children having to walk to the park.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the special use requested in
ZBA 32 -SU -90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros
Nays: Van Geem, Farley
Motion failed.
ZBA 34-V-90, 404 North Prospect Manor ZBA 34-V-90
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow 404 PROSPECT
a 2-1/2 foot side yard setback, instead of the MANOR
required 5 feet in order to construct a garage.
Page 5 - June 5, 1990
Page 6 - June 5, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 34-
V-90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem,
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at
the June 19th meeting.
ZBA 37-V-90
ZBA 37-V-90, 105 North Waverly Place
105 N.WAVERLY PL
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow an
impervious lot surface coverage of 57%, instead of the
permitted 45%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
It was noted that the Petitioner would like to add a
wooden deck to his home. It was also noted that the
existing impervious coverage is 55%.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the variation requested in ZBA 37-
V-90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading at
the June 19th meeting.
ZBA 25-A-90
ZBA 25-Z-90, Text Amendments
TEXT AMENDMENTS
The Village administration has suggested that various
sections of Chapter 14 (Zoning Ordinance) be amended
to better list and define permitted obstructions in the
side and front yards. The request also includes
amending all sections governing obstructions in the
required yards in an effort to clarify those areas.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these
amendments by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the amendments requested relative to
the definition of permitted obstructions in the side
and front yards as requested in ZBA 25-A-90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur,•Busse, Floros, Van Geem.
. Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board of
Appeals and grant the amendments requested governing
the permitted obstructions in required yards, as
requested in ZBA 25-A-90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - June 5, 1990
An Ordinance will be presented for first reading on
PARKWAY TREE
June 19th.
REMOVAL
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH. 15
would create regulations governing landscaping in
LANDSCAPE ORD.
the Village. The regulations governing landscaping
would be made a part of the Village Code by
creating Chapter 15, presently "Reserved".
FOREST TREE
This Ordinance will be presented June 19th for
SERVICE,INC.
second reading.
A request was presented to accept a utility easement
ORCHARD FIELD
for storm sewer drainage for the orchard Field
TOWNHOMES,
Townhomes, generally located at 400 East Rand Road.
400 E. RAND RD.
This easement would be incorporated in the overall
plan for development.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
accept the storm sewer easement as part of the orchard
Field Townhome development on east Rand Road.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented to authorize a Letter of
ID(Yr AGREEMENT:
Understanding between the Village and the Illinois
SCHOENBECK &
Department of Transportation for the improvement
RAND ROADS
of Schoenbeck and Rand Roads, including Opticom.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest
his signature on the Letter of Understanding between
the Illinois Department of Transportation and the
Village relative to the improvement of Schoenbeck and
Rand Roads, including the installation of Opticom.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the BIDS:
following bids:
The following bids were received for parkway tree
PARKWAY TREE
removal:
REMOVAL
Bidder Medium Large Very Large
Forest Tree Service Inc. $10.45 $12.30 $13.50
Hendricksen Care of,Trees$11.25 $13.25 $15.30
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration
FOREST TREE
and accept the bid submitted by Forest Tree Service,
SERVICE,INC.
Inc. for the parkway tree removal contract at a total
cost not to exceed $7,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 7 - June 5, 1990
PARKWAY TREE
The following bids were received for parkway
TRIMMING
tree trimming:
Bidder Total
Nels Johnson $ 92,592.20
Forest Tree Service Inc. $ 99,925.83
Hendricksen $105,351.00
Asplundh $129,863.50
NELS JOHNSON
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the low bid submitted by Nels Johnson for
the parkway tree trimming contract at a cost not to
exceed $100,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
FUEL
The following bids were received for unleaded gasoline
and diesel fuel, per gallon, for all Village vehicles
based on an estimated use of 123,000 gallons of
unleaded and 32,000 gallons of diesel fuel for one
year:
Bidder Unleaded Diesel
Clauss Fuels, Inc. .7370 .5359
Lake Cook Farm Supply .7589 .5683
Royal Fuel Liquid Energies .7599 .5581
UNO-CAL .8205 .5885
Wright Industries .8294 .5744
Sweeney Oil .9022 .6370
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
accept the low bid submitted by Clauss Fuels, Inc. at
the cost listed above.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Kays: None
Motion carried.
HANDICAP ACCESS
The following bids were received for the installation
LIBRARY
of handicap access at the Mount Prospect Public
Library:
Bidder Total
Kandu Brothers Construction $11,000
Unison Construction, Inc. $12,212
Zodiac Construction Company $14,930
R. J. Haack Builders, Inc. $18,500
Polonia Construction Company $19,450
KANDU BROS.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the low bid submitted by Kandu Brothers
Construction in the amount of $11,000 to install a
handicap access at the Mount Prospect Public Library.
•
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Kays: None
Motion carried.
CRACK SEALING
The bid for crack sealing was conducted by the
Northwest Municipal Conference in order to get a better
price with several municipalities participating. The
Page 8 - June 5, 1990
Conference bidding process resulted in a low bid
submitted by Behm Pavement Maintenance.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the bid submitted by Behm Pavement
Maintenance for the crack sealing program at a cost
not to exceed $40,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floras, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the second of
three high service pump modifications:
Bidder Total
Independent Mech. Industries $51,620
Mosele & Assoc. Inc. $53,060
A. J. Lowe & Son, Inc. $59,007
PJM Contractors, Inc. $63,095
Advance Mechanical Contractors $64,872
Advance Mechanical Systems $87,500
BEHM PAVEMENT
MAINTENANCE
HIGH SERVICE
PUMP
MODIFICATIONS
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to INDEPENDENT
concur with the administration and consultants and MECH.IND.
accept the low bid submitted by Independent Mechanical
Industries in the amount of $51,620 for the high
service pump modification.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented to authorize the acceptance of TAX
the proposal submitted by Arkwright Mutual for tax INTERRUPTION
interruption insurance at a cost of $4,000 per year INSURANCE
which would cover any loss in taxes caused by a
catastrophe at Randhurst Shopping Center.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to ARKWRIGHT
accept the proposal submitted by Arkwright Mutual MUTUAL
for tax interruption insurance at a cost not to
exceed $4,000 per year.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A request was presented to accept the proposal submitted RISK
by Corporate Policyholders Counsel, Inc. to provide MANAGEMENT
ongoing risk management services at retainer cost SERVICES
of $500 per month.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to CPC
accept the proposal submitted by Corporate Policyholders
Counsel, Inc. (CPC) with a retainer fee of $500 per
month.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 9 - June 5, 1990
ROADWAY A request was presented to authorize the extension
MAINTENANCE of the existing roadway maintenance agreement between
AGREEMENT: IDOT the Village and the Illinois Department of
Transportation (IDOT) for another year. The State will
reimburse the Village $51,071.00 for said maintenance.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his
signature on the roadway maintenance contract to extend
services another year.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
EMERGENCY Mr.. Dixon presented a request to authorize an
SEWER REPAIRS expenditure not to exceed $6,000 for Glenbrook
Excavating Company to perform emergency sewer repairs
on Lincoln Street between Busse Road and Weller Creek.
It was noted that in conjunction with the flood study
by RJN Environmental it was discovered that these 12"
sanitary sewers are 3/4 blocked.
GLENBROOK Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
EXCAVATING CO. concur with the recommendation of the administration
and authorize Glenbrook Excavating Company to make
emergency sewer repairs on Lincoln Street between Busse
Road and Weller Creek at a cost not to exceed $6,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motioncarried.
RECYCLING The Village Manager announced that BFI has established
TRANSFER SITE a recycling transfer area on 2 acres owned by
Multigraphics (Central Road and Arthur Street) and that
the variations necessary to conduct this operation will
be requested from the Zoning Board of Appeals at a
future date.
YARD WASTE BAGS Mr. Dixon stated that a legal opinion has been
SALES TAX requested from the Department of Revenue as to whether
the Village should continue charging sales tax on the
sale of yard waste bags.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None.
EXECUTIVE EXECUTIVE SESSION
SESSION Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to go
into Executive Session for the purpose of discussing
collective bargaining (Public Works Contract) and
potential litigation.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
r
The Board went into Executive Session at 10:55 P.M.
Page 10 - June 5, 1990
Mayor Farley reconvened the meeting at 11:46 P.M. RECONVENE
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Arthur
Trustee Busse
Trustee Floros
Trustee Van Geem
It was noted that the Village Board was in Executive
Session to discuss collective bargaining and
potential litigation.
ADJOURN
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved ADJOURN
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll'call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 11:47 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 11 - June 5, 1990
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
June 14, 1990
CaDital Proiects
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund 763,861 1,947 30,960 734,848
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1985 155,687 2,145 2,800 155,032
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1987 - - - -
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - - -
Debt Service Funds
Cash & Invest.
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest.
Trust & Agency Funds
Balance
6/01/90 Through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
Flexcomp Trust Fund
6/01/90
6/14/90
List of Bills
Entry 6/14/90
General & Special Revenue Funds
1,397,751
16,412
10,148
1,404,015
General Fund
$ 3,609,707
$621,793
$ 783,743
$ 3,447,757
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
686,993
4,469
70,473
620,989
Community Development Block Grant Fund
3,656
7,000
4,355
6,301
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
17,860
70,294
83,821
4,333
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
3,704,899
190,292
443,400
3,451,791
Parking System Revenue Fund
258,017
4,992
4,570
258,439
Risk Management Fund
1,201,993
22,579
75,537
1,149,035
CaDital Proiects
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund 763,861 1,947 30,960 734,848
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1985 155,687 2,145 2,800 155,032
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1987 - - - -
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990 - - -
Debt Service Funds
1,090,830
7,007
179,987
917,850
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
3,207
3,614
-
6,821
Escrow Deposit Fund
1,397,751
16,412
10,148
1,404,015
Police Pension Fund
16,115,279
22,457
-
16,137,736
Firemen's Pension Fund
18,053,221
20,536
-
18,073,757
Benefit Trust Funds
261,528
-
2,167
259,361
$47,324,489
$995,537
$1,691,961
$46,628,065
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCDUNTS
AIROOM INC.
ALBRECHT ENTERPRISES
ALL AROUND CONSTRUCTION
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
PAUL BEONAR
BETHESDA LUTHERAN HOME INC.
BETTEN ROLLUP DOOR
BROTHERHOOD OF RR SIGNALMEN
CALLAGHAN 6 COMPANY
JIM HO CHI
CITIBANK• N.A.
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NATOL BK
ROSEMARY CORINI
RICHARD CZECHOlSXI
W. S. OARLEV COMPANY
DEJAGER CONSTRUCTION
DES PLAINES LAWN SPRINKLERS
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
DONATO PLUMBING
OONU UE L ASSOCIATESO INC.
EDUCATION ALLIANCE
BERNARD EILERS
THE ELZER CONST. GROUP
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 1
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
OUPL LICENSE PMT
535.00
$35.00
FINAL PMT-DEMQLITION
$10000.00
$1*000.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
APA JOB MARKET TABLE
$100.00
SIOO.00
REFUND HLTH INS CONT
$25.00
$25.00*
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
113.68
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.32
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$6.84
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$.66
322.50
EQUIPMENT
$970524.00
$970524.00*
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$29.688.20
$29*688.20
REFUND FINAL WAITER BILL
$232.56
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$22.44
$255..00
PMT Of INS CLAIMS -GAB 5/`2/90
$6.424.20
$60424.20
PMT P/R 6/14/90
$224.25
$224.25
APRILv 1990 SERVICE
$90025.11
SERVICE -APRIL 1990
$50643.78
1140668.89
0 E M 89/9'0
$103352.00
$i00352s00
BOND REFUND
SIVS00000
$1*500.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
(34.20
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$3.30
$37.50
GEAR BAGS
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
1475.00
$475.0
BONO REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
P/R ENDING 6/14190
$473.88
a
P/R ENDING 6/14/90
1371*820.87
P/R ENDING 6/14190
'110150.02
P/R ENDING 6/14/90
3360336.35
$409*781.12*
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$10137.56
SERVICES RENDERED
$10082.08
SERVICES RENDERED
$539.22
$2*758.86
APPL'ECARE EXTENDED WARRANTY
$567.00
3567.00
BONO REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BONO REFUND
$535.00
$535.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
FIRST NAT°L BANK OF MT. PROS.
FULTON CONTRACTING CO.
GFE# INC
GLASS♦ HILL• DALLMEYER E ROTH*
OTTO GOEBBERT E SONS FARM MARK
VICTOR CORNY
H. C. REMODELING
HI -GRADE -PLUMBING
HIDDEN AGENDA
DANIEL HOLTZ
HOMES BY HEMPHILL# INC.
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
IN COMMAND INC.
FRANK IOVINE
ANDREA SUSZCZYK
KASPER CONSTRUCTION CO.
JOEL KENNEDY CONSTRUCTION CO.
JOSEPH LOPICCOLO
SAM LUM1A
LUND INDUSTRIES, INC.
ANDREA LYNN
AUSTIN MCOANIEL CORPORATION
MCGILL MANAGEMENT INC -
MILLER* MASON L DICKENSON# INC
MT. PROSPECT BIBLE CHURCH
B. MU NDO
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT OATE 6/14/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5/31
i11*133.97
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5/31
$99.68
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5131
$39.88
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5/31
S2*599.73
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5/31
$954.94
S14v828.20*
MAINTENANCE
Si*494.40
$1*494.40
WHEEL INSERTS
$525.89
$525.89
SERVICES RENDERED
S4v500.00
S4*500.00
ROWERS
$1:84$.50
$I#841.50
BOND REFUND
5100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
575.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
JACKETS
5185.56
$185.56
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$6.84
REFUNO FINAL NATER BILL
$.66
$7.50
EMPLOYEE SHARE MAY# 1990
$22#100.95
EMPLOYER SHARE MAY* 1990
550x586.43
$72*687.38*
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$1#243.83
$iP243.83
HLTH INS CONT REFUND
$25.00
$25.00*
P/R 6/14/90
$254000
$254.00
BOND REFUND
EIOO.00
3100.00
CONTRACT B SEWER
$16.140.00
CONTRACT B SEWER REHAB
$71851.60
PROSPECT MEADOWS CONTRACT C
$4#219.15
CONTRACT C BOB -O -LINK SEWER
S199000.00
$47#210.75
BOND REFUND
SI00.00
$100.00
BONO REFUND
575.00
$75.00
SIREN SYSTEMS
$910.00
3910.00
REFUND HLTH INS CONT
$7.50
$T.50*
COMPUTEk SERVICE
Si*200.00
$1.200.00
OVERPMT OF INVOICES
$7.56
$7056*
ACTUARIAL SERVICES
x3¢900.00
$39900.00
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$82.08
REFUND FINAL NATER BILL
57.92
$90.00
BOND REFUND
$!00.00
$100.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
NICHOLAS E ASSOC
BOND REFUND
6 00.00
$100.00
NORDIC GEN. CONST.
BOND REFUND
$75.00
375.00
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1700 W CENTRAL
3106.48
1700 W CENTRAL
$106.47
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
$83.94
1830 KENSINGTON
$533.49
$830.38
JOHN O*BRIEN
BOND REFUND
$600.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$650.00`
PECK/JONES CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
PETTY CASH - 'FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$40.00
MISC EXPENSES
$5.00
345.00*
PIERCE BUILDERS
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
PRECISION ARTS* INC.
MCGRUFF PINS
$86.50
$86.50*
R J £ G SEWER
BOND REFUND
3100.00
BOND REFUND
SLO0.00
$200.00
RED WING SHOE STORE
BOOTS
$110.00
$110.00
EDWARD RICHTER
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
t2i.22
REFUND FINAL WATER BILL
$1.96
$23.20
ROYAL FUEL LIQUID ENERGIES INC
FUEL
$9.116.08
FUEL
35*092.73
$14*208.81
SCOTI SEMAR BUILDERS
BOND REFUND
$3*200.00
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$3*250.00
HITESH SHAH
BOND REFUND
$475.00
$475.00
SHANE'S ENGRAVING
BOND REFUND
S70-Do
$70.00(
STANDARD SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO.
CHEMICAL DETECTION TUBES
$204.25
CHEMICAL DETECTION TUBES
$119.72
CHEMICAL DETECTION TUBES
$38.58
CHEMICAL DETECTION TUBES
$38.40
$400.95
STANDARD TAW INSTALL.CO.*INC.
BOND REFUND
3100.00
$100.00
TECO INC.
SUPPLIES
$78.02
$78.02
TRITON CONSULTING ENGINEERS* C
SERVICES RENDERED
31*010.04
$1*010.04
UNITED WAY/CROSADE OF MERCY
DIRECTORY METROPOLITAN CHICAGO
$30.00
330.00
VICTOR'S CUSTOM HOME
BOND REFUND
135.00
$35.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE 03896
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE C584I
$50.00
REINSPECTION FEE C6067
$50.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VITAL RECORD BANCx INC.
WACO ELECTRIC
NEIL WELLS
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 664/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
REINSPECTION FEE C6509
REINSPECTION FEE 06823
REINSPECTION FEE +06897
REINSPECTION FEE C7038
REINSPECTION FEE C7062
REINSPECTION FEE C7104
REINSPECTION FEE C1125
REINSPECTION FEE 07237
SERVICES RENDERED
REFUND OUPt PMT
BOND REFUND
GENERAL FUNO $511x486.05
COMMUNITY OEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT 31x249.70
MATER & SEWER FUND $99*410.06
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $61481.70
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 Si#00 0.O0
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
BUSSES FLOWERS S GIFTS
COMMUNITY EDUCATIi3N FOUNDATION
EVANS RESTAURANT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PAGE 4
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
125.00
$25.00
325.00
$25.00
525.00
$15.00
12'5.00
$15.00
$305.00
$213.66
$213.66
$35.00
$35.00
$100.00
$100.00
***TOTAL** 3751x22+4.15
MOTOk FtJE'C TAX FUND $5:643.78
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND 383x821.35
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND 32x135.06
CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND 129:788.20
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND $lOvl48.25
FLOWERS
FLOWERS
FEOWERS
DONATION FOR FIGHTING BACK
DWNTWN DEV MTG - 011INERS
MI SC EXPENSES
315.00
$38.00
$38.50
32.000.00
$76.65
(98.62
$91.50
$2x000.00
$78.65
$98.62*
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL** `$29268.77
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION I" DICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND 529268.T7
VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
AIRFARE -WEEKS
1109.00
310'9.00
JANET ABERNiET14Y
REIMBURSEMENT
$50.00
:50.00,-
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOC
REGISTRATION -WEEKS
$230.00
*230.00
IRENE F. BAHR
SERVICES RENDERED
5890. T5
5890.7'5
JOHN F. DIXON
ICMA ANNUAL CONF EXP
5250.00
1250.00#
GLASS• HILI• DALLMEYER C ROTHV
SERVICES RENDERED
$445.00
5445.00
ICMA
DUES -BURG
$315.00
3315.00
MAYFLOWER TRANSITv INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
51v886.67
$1*886.67#
MT. PROSPECT POLICE ASSOCIATIO
RETIREMENT DINNER
$20.00
$20.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SERVICES RENDERED
530.00
$30.00
OLD ORCHARD COUNTRY CLUB
LUNCMEON-BURG
*96.20
$96.20
PETTY CASH - 'FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
34.66
54.66*
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
ENVELOPES
519.35
$19.35
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DUES C DONATIONS - MORGAN
$174.50
°$114.50
XEROX CORP.
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
1141.27
$141.27
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$4,662.40
GENERAL FUND 54,P662.40
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
CITY HALL DIGEST
2 CONTEST ENTRIES
$90.00
190.00*
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
575 9 3G S
$50.00
$50.00
MELANIE KRUPP
BD MTG PROD CREW
$25.00
$25.00
ROSCOR CORPORATION
SERVICE
$120.00
$120.00
FRANK SMITH
BO MTG PROD CREW
525.00
$25.00
VENDOR
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
WHITE COLLAR SERVICES
WORD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES, IN
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
KEVIN D. CRISWELL
GEORGE J. HAMMfES
I.B.M. CORPORATION
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
MILL,ERx MASON S DICKERSONx INC
PEDERSEN L HOUPT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
XEROX CORP.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6114/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
TEMP HELP-NEWTSON
TEMP HELP NEWT SON
TEMP HELP - NEWTSON
FRT CHARGE PARTS
$I 94Z 3.47
PAGE 6
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$388.70
$384.96
$336.3T 31v110.03
$3.44 $3.44
***TOTAL** $1.423.47
REIMBURSEMENT
$371.TT
$371.71
SERVICES -MAY
'$180.00
$180.00
TUITION-CRISWELL
$240.00
MTCE COMPUTERS 6 PRINTER
$194.00
MTCE COMPUTERS C PRINTER
$52.00
3486.00
5T5 9 3G S
$2x442.40
$29442.40
HANDBOOK
$10.00
$10.00
ACTUARIAL SERVICES
$650.00-
$650.00
TRANSFER TAX -MAY 90
$90.00
$40.40
MISC EXPENSES
S2i.01
MISC EXPENSES
$14.14
335.15*
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$105.77
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$67.25
$173.02
ENVELOPES
$ I65. 00
ENVELOPE'S
5193.50
$358o50
DELIVERY
118.20
$18.20
MONTHLY CHARGES 1090 COPIER
Si.772.12
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAIN
3141.2T
$1x913.39
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$12.00
$12.00
***TOTAL**
S%*40.43
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE `T
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/'14/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $5,*440.43
+�sss#�##aa#�sas#s####ss a#ss�ats#�aw�sa#s�#�s##�gaasw��aas�as:ssa�s��as�g��s�a#a�xs����as�s�� aa��
VILLAGE CLERK`S OFFICE
T14E DRAWING BOARD
TYVEK ENVELOPES
$384.97
$384.97
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL 'PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$24.37
LEGAL NOTICE
$65.81
LEGAL NOTICE
358.50
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICE
'$65.81
LEGAL NOTICE
$+68.25
LEGAL NOTICE
358.50
LEGAL NOTICE
$53.62
LEGAL PAGE
$21.93
3496.79
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
ENVELOPES
$19.35
x19.35
VILLAGE CLERK*S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
$901.11
GENERAL FUND
$901.11
RISK MANAGEiMENT
BROOKFIELD ADMIN FEES -JUNE $3e491.80
,RINE PREMIUM $7,P147.96
MED CLAIMS THRU 5131%90 $29$752.63 a
MED CLAIMS THRV 6/6190 $10$229.53 s
MEDICAL CLAIMS THRU 6/12/90 314022.54 $659144.46#
PORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE C LIFE INS JUNE,* 1"0 52#050.59 $29050.59#
VENDOR
RISK MANAGEMENT
GAS BUSINESS SERVICESt INC.
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
POSTMASTER
RONALD t- SILVER. M.D.
MICHAEL STEPHEINSON
RISK MANAG€HENT
R I SIC MANAGEMENT FUND
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
PURCHASE OESCRIPTION
REIMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
RE IMBURSEMENT
REIMBURSEMENT
SERVICE FEES -JUNE
SERVICES RENDERED
SERVICES - HAGEDURN
HL'TH MAGAZINE POSTAGE
SERVICES RENDERED - WERNER
REPLACEMENT OF GLASSES
$69,9 055.06
PAGE 8
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
539.00
$130.00
$53.00
EXPENSES-BOCA CONFERENCE
*58.50
1855.50
324.75
REGISTRATION - JAKES
$1,9045.84
$1,9221.09
$2-12.00
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$192.00
$404.00
344.92
544.92
$85.00
$85.00
SIOS-00
$105.00.
***TOTAt*s
369,90'55.06
**+�a��a****s*s**sssg*ssasas*ssx�s�sa ssssassss�ss*ss*a�aasss�ss�sss*s�ss***ss�s*+axssssss�.sssss�:s+as�sa�*
INSPECTION SERVICES
COMPUTERLAND
SUPPLIES
$130.00
$130.00
DAN ,TAKES
EXPENSES-BOCA CONFERENCE
1855.50
1855.50
NAT'L. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
REGISTRATION - JAKES
S80.00
$80.00
NATIONAL. FIRE PRCT. ASSOC.
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$319.50
$319.50
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
S1T.46
MISC EXPENSES
$15.00
MISC EXPENSES
$14.14
146.60*
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
ENVELOPES
$28.50
ENVELOPES
$19.35
$4T-85
VITAL RECORD BANC9 INC.
SERVCCES RENDERED
5465.06
3465.06
XUDATACOMP INC.
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$12.00
$12.00
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
51,9956.51.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND 319956..51
POLICE DEPARTMENT
CADE INDUSTRIES
WINOSIHIELD WASHER SOLVENT
#233.15
5233.75
GOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL TESTING
EXAMINATIONS
$6:600.00
$69600.00r
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
828 9 15 G
$30.63
$174.65
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES* INC
921 9 15 G
$22.69
575 9 3G S
3300.00
575 9 3G S
$100.00
5453.32
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
PARTS
X233.29
$233.29
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
AUTO PARTS MAY 90
$452.6T
$452.67
TCI OF ILLINOIS
CABLE
19.00
$9.00
TREASURER, STATE OF ILLINOIS
FEES 7/1/90-12/31/90
$109963.20
` IOv9r63.20
XUDATACOMP INC.
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$60.00
$60.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
**aTOTAt*o
$199005.23
GENERAL FUND
$199005.23
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
DON ANDERSON
REIMS -OFFICE SUPPLIES
$17.89
ESOA VESTS I NAME TAGS
$29.50
REIMS -OFFICE SUPPLIES
$127.27
$174.65
ARATEX AND MEANS SERVICES* INC
LINEN SERVICE
$75.12
LINEN SERVICE
$103.48
LINEN SERVICE
'$80.54
$259.14
ARLINGTON HEIGHTS FORD
PARTS
$97.32
197.32
AT>T
SERVICE
1.65
SERVICE
$4.50
$5.15
Vink!713:1
FIRE 6 EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
BUE'LL MANUFACTURING COMPANY
EDWARD CAVECLO
CELLULAR ONE - CHICAGO
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKEIRY
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
CHICAGO COM$IUNICATION SERVICE*
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CREST COMPUTER SUPPLY* INC.
ii. S. DARLEY COMPANY
FERNO-WASHINGTONv INC.
FIRE CHIEF
FIRE ENGINEERING BOOKS
GFEv INC
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
HAGEN AUTO PAINT E SUPPLY
HUGO°S MAC TOOLS
I/O/E/A INC.
ILLINOIS SELL TELEPHONE CO.
IN COMMAND IWC.
KAR PRODUCTS INC
KNAPP SHOES INC.
DAVID KOSAR
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS E OFFIC
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
MOTOROLA* INC.
NORTHEAST I'LL. EMERGENCY MMT.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
AIR COMPRESSOR E TANK
5;71.35
$471.35
IL FIRE CHIEFS ASSN
$118.26
$118.26
SERVICE
$58.37
SERVICE
$58.37
3116.74
DONUTS HAL MAT CLASS
$$1.00
DONUTS HAL MAT CLASS
$16.20
$97.20
070 0057060 0
Si36.86
070 0057060 0
$i28.4T
$265033
SERVICE
$11.60
$11.60
BA77-JT-2404-A
$8.57
$6.57
DISKETTES
$56.82
556.82
GEAR BAGS
$3.30-
$3.30
EQUIPMENT
$14.93
$14.93
SUBSCRIPTION RENEWAL
$50.00
$50.00
PUBLICATION
$38.95
$38.95
SUPPLIES
$51.74
EQUIPMENT
$119.30
WHEEL INSERTS
$6.53
$183.57
SERVICE TIRE
577.73
$77.73
PAINT SUPPLt€S
S13i.35
MISC SUPPLIES
SZ2i.69
$353.04
EQUIPMENT
$84.95
$84.95
SUPPLIES
$59.51
$59.51
57 5 9 3G S
$ 400.00
560 9 I5 G
$86.72
$486.72
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$31.17-
$31.17
PARTS
$228.65
3228.65
SHOE'S-KORDECKI
$74.99
$74.99
REIMBURSEMENT -FOOD
$23.55
$23.55
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5278003
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$63.6T
OFFICE SUPPLIES
53.68
OFFICE SUPPLIES
328.48
$373.86
SERVICE
$6.91
$6.91
PARTS
542.63
$42.63
REGISTRATION - CT ARK
325.00
FIRE S EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
OSCAR WASTYN SCHNINN
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
REO $LING SHOE STORE
REDI-STRIP COMPANY
STANDARD SAFETY EQUIPMENT CO.
SULLIVAN PRESS
TECHNOMIC PUBLISHING CO.. INC.
TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT
TRISTAR INOUSTRIES/AAA FASTEN.
U. S. AUTO GLASS CENTER• INC.
XL/DATACOMP INC.
FIRE C EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE it
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REGISTRATION - THILL
$25.00
$50000
EQUIPMENT
3599.95
5599.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$98.50
598.50
ROUTS
52.05-
52.05
DOORS
5432.00
$432.00
CHEMICAL DETECTION TUBES
59.29
FLOWERS
SUPPLIES
$322.18
MICHAEL DOROSH
SUPPCIES
$125.41
X;56.88'
BUSINESS CARDS-DEEREY
$39.00
$39.00
PUBLICATIONS
588.00
$88.00
RENTAL" CRGS
$96.00
$96.00
TOOLS E ABRASIVES
$225.95
$6.00
ABRASIVES
$2*45
$228.40
REPAIRS
378.50
$78.50
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$63.00
$63.00
***TOTAL**
$5*9750894
S4*834.50 CAPITAL
IMPRV. E REPL. FUND
$1x171034
�a�s�+�a�4as�ta�as�a�ss��*��aa�a:s�s�*s���raa�ssc��ra�s�ahag*a�sa����#�aha�a�a�r�s�s�a�a�ta
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
AMERICAN TAXI CO.*INC.
SENIOR RIDES
5804.00
$804.00
LEONARD N. BAZAN
HOM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
$57.00
$57000
SHARON BLAZEK
HOM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
59.00
$9000
DARYL BOYD
HOM DRIVER REIMS -MAY
318.130
$18.00
BUSSEOS FL0WERS E GIFTS
FLOWERS
X108*50
$IO8.50
MICHAEL DOROSH
HOA DRIVER REIMB-MAV
S6.00
56000
ELK GROVE TAXI
SENIOR TAXI RIDES
113.35
$13.35
COLLEEN ESENBERG
MON DRIVER REIMS -MAY
59.00
$9.00
HAZEL FRICKE
HOM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
$6.00
$6.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
JOHN P. HOP'KINS
ENTERTAINMENT FOR ELDERHONOR
6200.00
$200.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
575 9 3G S
$200.00
$200.00
LISA LEVIN
HOM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
19.00
$9.00
EARLE MATTSON
HOM DRIVER REIMS -MAT
$9.00
$9.00
MR. PETER S BANQUETS
ECDERHON OR LUNCHEON
$1v140.80
6I*I40.80
RICHARD NORAK
HOFM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
$9.00
$9.00
PETTY CASH - FINALE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$39.96
$39.96#
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
ENVELOPES
$19.35
$19.35
OTTO SCHERR
HDM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
$9.00
$9.00
JEANNE SHERMAN
HDii DRIVER REIMB-MAY
59.00
$9.00
SPRINGHOUSE BOOK CO.
NURSE REVIEW
$19.30
$19.30
BERTHA STEEL
HOM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
312..00
$12.00
KATHI WESLEY
ROM DRIVER REIMB-MAY
$15.D0
$15.00
HELEN WHITLOCK
HO°M DRIVER REIMB-MAX
$6.00
$6.00
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$2*728.26
GENERAL FUND
$2.T28.26
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
AMERICAN SOCIETY OF LANDSCAPE
FEE -1990 CHAPTER AWARDS
$65.00
$65.00#
B C H INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$20.78
SUPPLIES
$64.64
SUPPLIES
$42.50
5127.92
COLOR TILE
FLOOR TILE SENIOR CTR
$72.00
$72.00
TONY GUARISCO PLBG.
COBG - 307 N FAIRVIEW
$300.00
$300.00
INTERNATIONAL AUDIO* INC.
PACE 90 TAPES
$108.74
$108.74
MICHAEL J. MORAN
SERVICES RENDERED
$92.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$157-00
6249.00
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
CONFERENCE-FRITL
$10.00
$20.00
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
$65.81
$65.81
VENDOR
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PETTY CASH - FINANCE OEPT.
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
REI TITLE SERVICES
RICHARD ENTERPRISESv INC.
U. S. EXTERIOR BY SEIDEL
VANS ARTISTS DESIGNERS SUPPLIE
XEROX CORP.
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
GENERAL FUND
STREET DIVISION
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6114/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MISC EXPENSES
SiO.7S
$40.61
MISC EXPENSES
il5000
a
MISC EXPENSES
x2.42
328.17*
ENVELOPES
(19.35
$19.35
SERVICES RENDEREO
375.00
575.00
INSTALL FLOOR - SENIOR CENTER
5903.00
1903.00
CDBG - LOOS W PENDLETON
S1v440.00
31iri40.00,
SUPPLIES
333.75
SUPP't I ES
12I. 7e
560.53
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN
$141.26
$141.28
$157.96
***TOTAL**
33s665.80
$560.99 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$39104.81
AOOI.SON BUILDING MATERIAL CO.
SLOG SUPPLIES
$40.61
SLOG SUPPLIES
324. T5
BLDG SUPPLIES
52.02
BLDG SUPPLIES
$11.23
176.61
ADVANCE PRESS INC.
SUPPLIES
$207.D0
S20T.00
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
PARTS
319.32
PARTS
$i.06
PARTS
$157.96
PARTS
$I78.35
PARTS
3289.86
#646.59
ALDRIDGE ELECTRICt INC.
SIGNAL MTCE MAY 90
31,968.75
319968.75
AM -LIN PRODUCTS• INC.
CLNG SUPPLIES
3278.X*
32TBo74
AMERICAN ARBORIST SlU"EIES. IN
SUPPLIES
$306.08
SUPPLIES
$7.76
$313.82
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/'14/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL.
STREET DIVISION
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
MICE -JUNE
$140.00
$140.00
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
DOOR CLOSER
$59.50
$59.50
ARROW ROAD CONSTRUCTION
SUPPLIES
S102.40
SURFACE
$99.60
SURFACE E EMULSION
$375.00
FOREST AVE RECONSTRUCTION
$62.860.50
$636437.50
ATLAS BOBCAT INC.
PARTS
$105.16
PARTS
$47.66
$152.82
B &' H INDUSTRIES
CAMERA PAPER BLOW UP
$75.55
BLUEtINES
$24.T2
$100.27
BLACK S DECKER
DUST BUSTER
(19.99
$19.99
MELVIYN BOTH
CLOTHING AtLCWANCE
$IBi.34
$181.34
Tiff BRAKE ALIGN COMPANY
PARTS
376.50
$76.50
BROWNING FERRIS IND13STRIES
TART) MATERIAL BIN
$48.00
$48.00
BUDGET SIGN COMPANY
DECALS
$91.30
691.30
BUSSE CAR WASH* INC.
VER WASH
$41050
341.50
CADE INDUSTRIES
CLNG SUPPLIES
$502.00
SUPPLIES
$3ZI.00
SUPPLIES
S20 4.42
SUPPLIES
5201.42
SUPPLIES
SZOL042
SUPPLIES
$201.41
SUPPLIES
S2DI.41
SUPPLIES
$201.42
S13PPLIES
3220.50
SZ*ZSZ.00
CALLAGHAN C COMPANY
SERVICES RENDERED
$4491.77
$491.77
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
OIL
$366.30
$366.30
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
;46.40
$46.40
CHICAGO TURF i IRRIGATION
PARTS
$217.ZT
SUPPLIES
$2.84
$220.11
CITRON CKEMICAL9 INC.
C`L G SUPPLIES
3578.23
#578.23
ARTHUR CLESEN• INC.
S1lPPtIES
$62.40
SUPPLIES
$288.00
SUPPLIES
$226.10
3576.50
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM SERVICE
ST3.T1
UNIFORM SERVICE
$16.52
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
STREET DIVISION
$15.39
UNIFORM SERVICE
$86.59
UNIFORM SERVICE
$20.97
UNIFORM SERVICE
$135.00
UNIFORM SERVICE
COMPUTERLAND
SOFTWARE
KAREN DE4WERT
SIDEWALK REPLACEMENT
DOOR SYSTEMS9 INC.
REPAI"RS
DURABLE PAWING CO.
DRIVEWAY RESTORATIONS
E E E HAULING• INC.
REFUSE DISPOSAL
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
TIRE REPAIRS
EARTH INC.
MATERIALS -MAY 90
FILTER SERVICES ILLINOIS
AIR FILTERS
$125.20
AIR FILTERS
FINISHMASTER* INC.
SUPPLIES
$85.39
SUPPLIES
$189.93
SUPPC I ES
FOLGERS FLAG £ flECORATING• INC
PENNANTS
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
REPAIRS
OTTO GOEBBERT E SONS FARM MARK
FLOWERS
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$ 230.25
TIRES
$81.99-
VEH MTCE SUPPLIES
$120.16
TIRES
W. W. GRAINGER INC.
PARTS
I.B.M. CORPORATION
EQUIPMENT
I880TSON HEATING CO.
PARTS
IfiGRAM ENTERPRISES9 INC.
TURF MOWING
s1*080.00
TURF MOWING
LAND AND LAKES CO
REFUSE DISPOSAL
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
633.90
SUPPL I t_ S
5149.24
SUPPLIES
LINDE GASES OF THE MIDWEST
T CYLINDERS STARGON GAS
MEADOWS GARAGE DOOR CO.
REPAIR DOOR
ROGER MEYER
MATERIALS E HAULING 4 6
MORAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
PARTS
5* 1990
PAGE !S
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$74.T5
$15.39
$86.59
$20.97
3287.193
$135.00
$135.00
$61.50
161.50
198.87
s98.87�
$3,935.00
S39935.00`
556.50
$56+50
$15.00
$15.00
$405.00
$405.00
S le 211.76
$100.80
$1$312.56
$125.20
$28.92
$85.39
$234.51
$189.93
$189#93
s157.10
$157.10
$6.40
36.40
$248.22
S 25 5.94
$ 230.25
$81.99-
$652.42
$120.16
$120.16{
$1V100.00
iIVI00.00
$120.00
#120.00
$700.00
S700.O0
$$*400.00
s1*080.00
s1:080.00
$43.+40
S57.90
633.90
$135.20
5149.24
6149.24
$57.00
$57.00
$i*368.50
$Lt368.50
$76.92
176.92
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
AUTO PARTS MAY 90
$98.86
AUTO PARTS MAY 90
$259.07
$357.93
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOMOATION
DUES -CLARK
$10.00
110.00
NATIONAL GUARDIAN SECURITY 'SER
REPAIRS
$184.60
$184.60
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
SERVICES RENDERED
5700.00
$700.00
NEON MATERIALS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$151.16
$1.51.16
NORTHWEST FORD TRUCK SALES INC
PARTS
$2134.82
5284.82
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
CONTRACTOR NOTICE -SIDEWALK REPL
329.25
529.25
PETTf CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL L SUPPLIES
$16.53
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
17.63
SR
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$79.18
s
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$39.56
TRAVEL t SUPPLIES
$12.04
a
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$64.65
�
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
1Z7.Y4
s
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
32.17
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$10.98
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
;36.34
TRAVEL. E EXPENSES
SI2.79
s
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$4.53
1313.150*
PORTABLE TOOL SALES
SUPPLIES
$64.06
$64.06
PROSAFETY
StYPPLIES
$101.70
$101.70
R. Co.' TOPSOIL
MATERIALS - MAY 90
$540.00
5540.00
RAINBOW i MR PHOTO EXP.
FILA t PROCESSING
$40.75
FILM E PROCESSING
$36.O0
$76.75
RAYMAR HYDRAULIC REPAIR SERYIC
REPAIR SERVICE
$245.00
$245.{10
RENT RITE EQUIPMENT COMPANY
FLOOR SCRUBBER RENTAL
$235.40
$235.40
RIKER DISTRIBUTING COMPANY* IN
PARTS
$118.05
$118.05
SOIL 6 MATERIAL CONSULTANTS* I
MATERIAL TESTING
$843.00
MATERIAL TESTING
$460.00
tMATERIAt TESTING
$185.00
$1:488.00
STANDARD PIPE t SUPPLY INC.
PLBG SUPPLIES
$203.79
PLBG SUPPLIES
$80.01
3283.80
STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
3Z79.53
$279.'53
P. R. STREIiCH
CYLINDERS
$128.18
5178.18
TCI OF ILLINOIS
PW CABLE BILL
;9.75
$9.75
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
TECH SYW CORPORATION
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MICHAEL WAGNER E SONS, INC.
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
WELLER CREEK DRAINAGE DISTRICT
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
$3.64
*3.64
MONTHLY CYLINDER RENTAL
$2.95
$2.95
1 S PINE ST
=147.50
5147.50
SERVICE L SUPPLIES
$82.60
$82.60
SUPPLIES
(134.64
3134.64
REIMBURSE FOR 1/2 REPAIRS
$250.00
'$250.00
526*926.84 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUN0
***TOTAL** 39IVT56.0
MATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ADDISON BUILDING MATERIAL CO. BLDG SUPPLIES 316.87
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
AMP PRODUCTS CORPORATION
B L H INDUSTRIES
BADGER METER INC
BLS EXTERPRISESV INC.
BRISTOL BABCOCK, INC.
$64,829..25
BLDG SUPPLIES
$19.35
BLDG SUPPLIES
$5.98
BLDG SUPPLIES
$13.68
BLDG SUPPLIES
$22.50
BLDG SUPPLIES
$19.2+4
PARTS
$19.32
PARTS
$1.07
PARTS
$157.98
PARTS
$178.34
$356.71
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$300.80
1988 G.O. BONDS INT 6/1/90
SIZVO62050
313*I63.30*
sUPPC I ES
$2$.8+4
SOPPLIES
$75.73
5103.57
BLUELINIES
S24 -T3
324.73
FRT CHGS-RETURNED METERS
$46.00
$46.00
REPAIR HPDR CYL
$688.00
$688.00
MOTORS
'!151.64
$IS1.64
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 18
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/i4/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
R. 1. BUSSE INC.
REFUSE EIISPOSAL
$50.00
$50.00
BUSSE CAR WAS"# INC.
VEH WASH
$56.00
$56.00
CADE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$321.00
$321.00
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$46.40
$46.40
CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY
AD -PARTS ROOM
$507.00
$507.00
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM SERVICE
$73.T1
UNIFORM SERVICE
$16.52
U141FORM SERVICE
$7+5.75
UMIFURM SERVICE
315.39
UNIFORM SERVICE
$86.58
UNIFORM SERVICE
$20.97
$287+.92
CONTINENTAL ILLINOIS NAT't BK
OPER/'MAINT COSTS - JAWA
$6*Z22.00
VILLAGE SHARE FIXED COSTS - JAWA
$107x321.00
LAKE WATER PURCHASE - JAWA
$ItIv508.00
POWER COSTS - JAWA
$11.340.00
$2367391.00
CORNER STONE SERVICES
STAKES
$108.00
$108.00
R. L. CORTY E COMPANY
CLNG SUPPLIES
$3+45.00
5345.00
DONOHUE E ASSOCIATES* INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
$.06
$.06
OREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORSt IN
PARTS
$750.00
$750.00
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
TIRE REPAIRS
$51.00
$51.00
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CD.
OTR -10-165 TAPE
$40.57
$40.57
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
DELIVERIES
$38.00
DELIVERIES
$24.25
DELIVERIES
$61.75
5124.00
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF CHICAGO
SSA 05 INT 06/7/90
$34T968.75
53+49968.+7`
GLENBROOK EXCAVATING
PAYMENT 02
$36*746.45
EMERGENCY SEWER REPAIR
$57700.00
$42:446.45
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
TIRES
$248.22
TIRES
$255..94
VEH MTCE SUPPLIES
ST7.58
TIRES
$81.99-
$499.75
GREELEY AND HANSEN
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$;8.00
3!8.00
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
WATER METER LABOR
522.24
WATER METER EXCHANGE
134.38
$56.62
I.B.M. CORPORATION
EQUIPMENT
$ I7190.00
EQUIPMENT
$40.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
r
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
MTCE SERVICE
$100.43
MTCE SERVICE
$81.90
MTCE SERVICE
319635.77
MTCE COMPUTERS E PRINTER
$194.00
MTCE SERVICE
$100.43
MTCE COMPUTERS E PRINTER
$52.00
%3*4g4.53
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CD.
424 9 15 B
$30.63
455 9 15 G
$203.83
068 9 15 G
$533.12
660 9 15 B
$37.041
17+$ 9 I5 G
330.63
013 9 15 G
$30.63
575 9 IS G
$19.20
575 9 3G S
$300.00
34T 9 3G S
$25.99
iv 211.07
IMAGES LABORATIDRIESf LTO.
Ct7PIES-SEWER REHAB PRINTS
$29.43
'$29.43
KOCH'S LUCKY ACRE
PKWY RESTORATION
$Ts512.00
$1*512.00
3.L. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$2.40
SUPPLIES
$390.85
SUPPLIES
$33.55
$426.80
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS E OFFIC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$38.36
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$307.10
(3#5.46
MCGIA TY BROS.s INC.
MISC TREE SPRAY
'$385.00
$385.00
REYER MATERIAL CO.
GRAVEL
$100.92
$100.9A,
ROGER MEYER
MATERIALS E HAULING 4 $ 5. 1990
$337.32
$337.32
MILBURN BROTHERS* INC.
PATCH PCC PAVEMENT
SUP412.00
$Is412.00
MOTORDLA• INC.
REPAIRS
$100.30
$100.30
MOUNT PROSPECT WHOLESALE AUTO
AUTO PARTS MAY 90
$324$.34
1324.34
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SS GOLF IW WAPELLA
$20.62
120.62
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
tEGAt NOTICE
'$20.00
LEGAL NOTICES
$20.00
LEGAL NOTICES
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$20.00
$80.00
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL E S1YPi tlES
$74.53
3
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$1.27
TRAVEL L SUPPLIES
$2.12
�
VENDOR
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
POSTMASTER
PROSAFETY
RAFFERTY DISTRIBUTORS
RAINBOW I HR PHOTO EXP.
RAYMAR HYDRAULIC REPAIR SERVIC
SAFETY SUPPLY ILLINOIS
SAN*S GLASS & TRIMv INC
SEWER EQUIPMENT CO. OF AMERICA
SRECO FLEXIBLE
V L G PRINTERS INC.
ZIEBELL WATER SERVICE PRODUCTS
WATER AND SEDER DIVISION
WATER L SEWER FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT GATE 6/14/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
TRAVEL £ SUPPLIES
TRAVEL £ EXPENSES
TRAVEL £ EXPENSES
TRAVEL £ EXPENSES
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
WATER BILLS -POSTAGE
SUPPLIES .
METER READING FORMS
FILM PROCESSING
FILM PROCESSING
REPAIR SERVICE
REGISTRATION FEE
REPAIRS
SUPPIL I E S
EQUIPMENT
NOTE SHEETS
MESSAGE PADS
PARTS
PARTS
$343* 93 0.34
PAGE 20
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
S41.94
$62.78
$47.76
$3.89
a
S.85
5235.14*
54iO.28
$410.282
$101.70
$101.70
$33T.50
1337.5$1
514.38
/8.89
$23.27
$190.58
$190.58
134.UO
$30.00*
$30.00
$30.100
$541.85
5541.85
$78.35
$78.35
$•90.00
5400.00
14#90.00
$4IrT0-
ST4.49
$32.79
***TOTAL**
$343*930.34
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
CHICAGO 'E NORTHWESTERN TRANS C CAVO LEASE $2*353.78 S2*353.78
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO. 19 NORTHWEST Hirt $81.05 $81.05
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION 4**TOTAL*s $Zv*34.83
VE NO OR
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6^4/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$29434.83
INVOICE AMOUNT
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES MAY 1990 REFUSE COLLECTION $1369648.90
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
MAY 1990 REFUSE COLLECTION
MAY 1990 REFUSE COLLECTION
MAY 1990 REFUSE COLLECTION
51599659.06
PAGE 21
TOTAL
$129950.32
$49550.11
559509.73 S1.59*659.06
***TOTAL** Si59t659.06
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
COSBY AND BELL LEGAL SERVICES $L*800.00 $19800.00
FIRE AND SECURITY SYSTERS9 INC FIRE ALARM SERVICE $828.63 4828.63
MARTAN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES RENDERED 1389677.50 5389677.50
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS *TOTAL** 5419306.13
GENERAL FUND $399506.23 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 SI9800.06
####�####s#*�r##s##*##ars9t#s9�#��9••#��###�a�t#a�#�#s��ss��+o�assi�t�#.��#ss�1s�►���s�srs���m�s� �aa�
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
FOLG'ERS FLAG S DECORATING9 INC BICENTENNIAL BANNERS $190.00
VENDOR
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUN0
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
BICENTENNIAL BANNERS
S1*530.00
PAGE 22
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
S Iv 340.00 's t*530.00
***TOTAt** S1*530.00
**es�a�#*a�#tr�#s�s*a�*#s#s*tgssass #sass s#sas#*#sssssas�#ss�*aaa�s�#ss*ss#sssa�sas�as*�*#*#*g**#s#�€a# ##*#a
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
AMERICAN NATIONAL BANK
WITHHOLDING TAXES
BOND TRANSFER FEES
$270.25
CHARLES
W. NICK
PENSION - JUNE 90
D/T REOEV 198TO INT
$56*936.25
$57*206.50*
COUNTRYSIDE BANK OF MOUNT
PROS
INSURANCE RES LOAN PRIM
$100.000.00
PAUL H.
WATKINS
JUNE DISABILITY BENEFIT
INSM ANCE RED LOAN INT 0 6/1
$59975*00
5105*915.00*
THE FIRST CHICAGO BANK OF
M.P.
SSA 02 INTEREST D6/1/90
349350.00
$4*350.00*
FIRST NAT*L BANK OF MT. PROS.
SSA 86 INTEREST 06/1/90
5129456.25
3IZ*456.25*
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
**-*TOTAL**
S"179*9d7.T5
.SSA 02 BtACKHANK B E
1
5q*350.00 INSURANCE RESERVE
8 E I
$105*975*00
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT B
E I 198TO
$56*936*25 DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT
B E I 19870
$270.25
SSA 06 GEORGE/ALBERT
B E I
512*45 6.25
PENSION FUNDS
FIRST NAT't.BANK OF MT. PROS.
WITHHOLDING TAXES
1200.00
3200.00
CHARLES
W. NICK
PENSION - JUNE 90
5683 -ZZ
5883.22
VILLAGE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JULY MEDICAL INSURANCE
1346.33
2346.33
PAUL H.
WATKINS
JUNE DISABILITY BENEFIT
S1*620.50
S1*620.50
PENSION
FUNDS
***TOTAL**
S3*050.05
TALLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 6/14/90
PAGE 23
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTIiNt IWOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
5883.22 BENEFIT TRUST 02
SZvtS8.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL S1969IV951.28
DATE RUN 6/14140
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TIME RUN [4.04.14
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING
SUMMARY BY FUND 6/[4/90
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
I
GENERAL FUND
$783,742.97
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
'$709473.03
23
COMMUNITY OEYLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$49354.51
24
ItL. MUNICIPAt RETIREMENT FUND
$839821.35
31L
BEMEFIT TRUST 0Z
529166.83
41
WATER 6 SEWER FUND
$4439400.40
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$49569.89
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
S75*536.76
52
CAPITAL IMPkV. 6 REPL. FUND
%309959.54
53
DOWNTOWN REOEOLPMT CONST 1985
$29800.00
63
SSA $2 BLACKMAMK B E I
549350.00
66
rNSURANCE RESERVE 8 E I
St0S9915000
68
DOWNTOWN REO'EVLPMT 8 6 I I98TO
$569936.25
TO
DOWNTOWN REDEV PMT 8 S I 1987C
1270.25
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FtINO
$109148.25
44
SSA 06 GEORGEI'ALBERT 8 C I
$129456.25
TOTAL ALL FUNDS
11969t9961.28
PAGE 24
ID—APPEAR
s�ss�a�ss�ass�sa�a����s�s:�sa�aa��agssata��aas�aa�os�ags�aa��;xsa� g��ss�asas� � s�
Governor's Task Force on Occupant Protection
2300 South Dirksen Parkway, Room 318
41ILV111111,1'1111111solod Springfield, Illinois 62764
FOR GREATER SAFETY BELT USE 217/782-5865
June 11, 1990
Honorable Gerald "Skip" Farley
Mayor
112 East Northwest Highway
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Mayor Farley:
This letter is a follow—up to the Mayoral Challenge conducted
January 1 through March 31, 1990 in which your community
participated. As you are aware, twenty—eight (28) communities
accepted the Challenge and conducted activities in an effort to
increase safety belt and safety seat use in Illinois.
Of those 28, nine communities have been selected for their
outstanding initiatives and will be recognized at the annual
Illinois Municipal League Conference, September 14 — 16, 1990
at the Chicago Hilton and Towers. These communities are Burr
Ridge, Lincolnshire, Naperville, Normal, Norridge, Pleasant
Plains, Springfield, Vernon Hills and New Burnside.
We have asked to be placed on the program at the conference.
These nine communities will be recognized at that time by the
presentation of a plaque. Program agendas will be mailed at a
date closer to the Conference.
At the present time, we are scheduling dates and times for the
presentation of a Certificate of Appreciation for all the
communities who participated in the Challenge. A
representative of the Governor's Task Force on Occupant
Protection will present your certificate at 7:30 p.m. on
June 19, 1990.
Once again, we applaud your efforts to promote the use of
safety belts and seats. If you need assistance, please do not
hesitate to contact us.
Sincerely,
Lynette L. Roof, Chairperson
Community Efforts Subcommittee
RESOLUTION NO. 25-90
A RESOLUTION HONORING JACK KEEFER
GRAND MARSHALL, JULY ATH P-AMDE 1990
WHEREAS, JACK KEEFER and his wife Helen have been residents
of the Village of Mount Prospect for the past 40 years,
having raised their 5 children in Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, JACK KEEFER served his country during World War II
on a PT Boat Squadron from 1941 through 1945; and
WHEREAS, JACK KEEFER, a registered Pharmacist, opened his
first drug store - Keefer's Pharmacy - in Mount Prospect on
Northwest Highway, later moving across the railroad tracks
to Prospect Avenue, which he operated until his partial
retirement some 50 years later; and
WHEREAS, during his many years as a Pharmacist, JACK KEEFER
was acknowledged by his peers and had the distinction of
being named Pharmacist of the Year in the State of Illinois
in 1973; and
WHEREAS, JACK KEEFER has and continues to be an active
member of the community, some of his activities have
included:
Originating the traditional Mount Prospect July 4th
parade in 1952;
Organizing the Memorial Day Parade for the past 20 years;
Participated in local high school Career Days, as a
result of which, many students were influenced by JACK
KEEFER and went on to become Pharmacists, doctors, and
other professionals;
Photographer for Paddock Publications
Created the Luxembourg News of America, which he writes,
publishes, and distributes to thousands of subscribers
both in the United States and abroad;
Member of the Mount Prospect Historical Society, having
held the positions of Secretary, Treasurer and President;
Member of the Mount Prospect Chamber of Commerce, having
held the positions of Secretary, Treasurer and President;
Member of the American Legion, having served as Commander
for 3 terms during his 50 year membership;
Member of VFW Post 1337, currently serving his 3rd term
as Commander;
Member of the Mount Prospect Lions Club, having served
as Presdient and all other positions in that civic
organization; and
WHEREAS, JACK KEEFER continues to volunteer his time and
efforts to these numerous projects out of his dedication
and love for the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby acknowledge the many
contributions of JACK KEEFER.
SECTION TWO: That the residents of the Village will have
an opportunity to express their appreciation to JACK KEEFER
as he serves as Grand Marshall of the 1990 Mount Prospect
July 4th parade.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage and approval in the
manner provided by law.
AYES: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem, Farley
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Wattenberg
PASSED and APPROVED this 19th day of June, 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
RESOLUTION NO. 26-90
A RESOLUTION NOTING THE PASSING OF
FRANK BIERMANN
WHEREAS, FRANK BIERMANN was born in Mount Prospect on
October 6, 1896 and remained a resident his entire life,
being a witness to the incorporation of the Village of
Mount Prospect and its growth and development; and
WHEREAS, FRANK BIERMANN and his beloved wife Helen raised
their 3 children in Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect was served solely by
members of the Volunteer Fire Department using equipment
pulled by men until such time as motorized vehicles were
purchased; and
WHEREAS, in 1914, at the age of 18, FRANK BIERMANN became
a member of the Mount Prospect Volunteer Fire Department;
and
WHEREAS, FRANK BIERMANN achieved success and was appointed
Chief of the Volunteer Fire Department in 1929, a position
he held until his retirement from the Department in 1956;
and
WHEREAS, during the years FRANK BIERMANN served on the
Volunteer Fire Department the population of Mount Prospect
grew from 100 residents to 12,000; and
WHEREAS, during his years on the Mount Prospect Volunteer
Fire Department FRANK BIERMANN earned the admiration of the
community and fellow firefighters as a true leader; and
WHEREAS, FRANK BIERMANN was one of the charter members of
the Mount Prospect Lions Club, having contributed his time,
efforts and property to benefit the residents of the
Village; and
WHEREAS, duringhis life FRANK BIERMANN owned and operated
the local hardware store "Busse-Biermann" on Busse Avenue,
during which time he practiced his philosophy that if you
treat people right they will treat you right, a philosophy
he call his "Come Back Sauce".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY,
ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby acknowledge the many
contributions of FRANK BIERMANN and do hereby express
sincere sympathy to his family on his passing.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution be spread upon the
minutes of the Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect and that a copy hereof, suitably prepared, be
presented to the family of FRANK BIERMANN.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force
and effect from and after its passage and approval in the
manner provided by law.
AYES: Trustees Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros, Van Geem,
Mayor Farley
NAYS: None
ABSENT: Wattenberg.
PASSED and APPROVED this 19th day of June, 1990.
%WCX-§W
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
9
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
Village of �,Acunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: JUNE 7, 1990
SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR LIQUOR LICENSE AT BRENTWOOD SQUARE
SHOPPING CENTER
There was a request made by John & Kin Corporation, which are John Moy and Kin
Chan, who are requesting a Class R Liquor License for consumption at dining tables for
a Chinese restaurant which they anticipate opening up in September at the Brentwood
Square Shopping Center.
The size of the establishment is approximately 1400 square feet and it would be two
stores down from the existing Photos' Hot Dogs. They are requesting a license for liquor
although they have had experience working in and, in fact, owning Chinese restaurants
in the past. They have not had a liquor license. The establishments they have owned
were carry -out Chinese food.
They anticipate having a Mandarin and Cantonese Chinese food specialties. They will
be opening for the lunch hour and up until 9:30 on weekdays and 10:30 on weekends.
They are not interested in liquor sales to take place without food service at the table.
They are U. S. citizens and are in the process of contacting the Police Department for
fingerprints and other information they need as far as the State license is concerned.
The Brentwood Square Shopping Center has been having some problems with leasing up
their spaces and has had a major tenant, the Ace Hardware already close its
establishment at this Center. This is now the third request for a Liquor License in this
shopping center. Photos' Hot Dogs already has a beer and wine License. There is a
request that has been made verbally, although they have not come forward, for a package
liquor store in this shopping center and this is now the third request, however, this is
connected with a fall service restaurant.
If this were to be granted, I believe there would be more than sufficient licenses at this
one shopping center and we should seriously review whether or any additional Liquor
Licenses should be granted at this particular shopping center.
The Chinese restaurant that was operated by the Chan family was China City in
Chinatown at 6207 South Kedzie.
JOHN FULTONN
JFD/rcw
attachment
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager ot-
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-28-Z-90, ZBA-29-SU-90, ZBA-30-V-90, Mr. John Kamysz
LOCATION: 720 East.Rand Road
DATE:, May 8, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for Village Board consideration, their findings on
application filed by Mr. John Kamysz. The application was filed for a rezoning from a B-
3 to a B-4 District, a Special Use Permit for a drive-thru fast-food restaurant, and perimeter
setback variations. Mr. Kamysz hopes to rebuild a restaurant at the site of the former
Honey Bee Restaurant.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of April 26, 1990. Mr. Kamysz
explained that this was the third hearing for redevelopment of his property, the most recent
being in March of 1989. At the last hearing, he had proposed only one driveway onto
Rand Road, satisfying concerns from the initial application, and increased the perimeter
setbacks as much as possible. This application was denied, primarily because of concerns
about traffic generated by the fast-food restaurant. Last year it was noted that a secondary
point of access through the parking lot of the Courtesy Home Center would work to solve
traffic concerns. Also last year, the setback variations were reviewed and approved.
Mr. Kamysz explained that at this time, he is proposing the same site plan, but with the
addition of a driveway to the Courtesy property. He believes that with this additional
access point, he has worked to resolve all the issues that were raised with the last
application. He noted that the building size, setbacks and parking were the same as the last
plan. The restaurant would be a small independent operation, featuring fast-food lunch and
dinner items.
The Zoning Board discussed the request, and noted the efforts made by the petitioner to
address earlier issues. The Zoning Board had the following concerns and observations:
1. The rezoning of the property to a B-4 District could allow some future use of the
building such as an automobile oriented use or a higher traffic restaurant. The
Zoning Board noted that a B-4 District is the only way to permit a fast-food
restaurant, and that the smaller size of this building would not lend itself to
conversion to a high volume use like a McDonald's.
ZBA-28-30 May 8, 1990
Page Two
2. The Zoning Board discussed the possibility of restricting left -turns in and out of the
site. However, it was believed that any such prohibition would place a hardship on
the restaurant operator.
The additional point of access at the rear of the site to the Courtesy parking lot
helps traffic flow.
3. The perimeter setback variations are reasonable considering the irregular shape of
the lot.
4. The menu board in the drive-thru aisle should be relocated to allow more stacking
of cars waiting to place orders.
After a thorough discussion, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted to approve the rezoning,
Special Use and setback variations to allow a fast-food restaurant to be constructed at 720
East Rand Road. Additional details are found in the attached minutes.
Lastly, it should be noted that a Plat of Consolidation for this property, and a restrictive
covenant for street light installation will be forthcoming to the Board.
DMC:cl
attachment
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 28-Z-90
Hearing Date: April 26,1990
29 -SL' -90
?ETITIONER:
John Kamysz
STUBJECT PROPERTY:
720 E. Rand Road
'Pr;1
REWEST:
Rezoning for this property
from B-3 to B-4 along with a
special --!se in order to allow
a drive-th.ru,, fast food rest-
aurant of 1,629 square feet.
Also requested are variations
from: Secl_-'�n 14.2002,1 to
a 13.5' front yard
instead of 30' as required by
Code. Section 14.2002.B to
allc%.: a 2' Side yard instead
of 10' as requires by Code.
Section 14.2002.0 to allow a
5 rear Ivard instead of 20' as
r qu; - ---I b- Code. Section
eq
14.3012 to waive the
requirement for a 12'x _15"
de7ivery load -,ng space.
13A ?RESENT:
1 be r t Ba s n 1-1 h
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannor.
"en Petrucelli
Robert Bretrager
Marr .vn '-.Iay
ABSr\-:
Lois Br- Hers
k
intrcduce-' "nfs --ase stating t;,at the
aVpli,ant 2-s requesting a rezoning for this property from
B - 1 to 3-'_ a-: n g t h a s -,-) e ci a 1 u s e ` n , r die r to allow
a
,!r'v--thru, fast-food restaurant of
1,620 square feet.
Also requested are the variations:
1. Seition 14.2002,A -o allow an 13.5' front yard instead
f 30' as required b., Code.
2. Section 14.2002.B to allow a 3' sidewardinstead of
ZBA-28-Z-90
ZEA -29 -SU -90
ZBA-30-V-90
April 26,1990
Page 2 of I
10' as required by Code.
3. S*-c'ir.n !;.2002,C to allow a 5' rear yard instead cf
CC' as required by Code.
I i .3012 to t,:aJ ve
t.e r-quirement fc_ a
35' delivery loading space.
The petitioner, John Kamysz, 720 E. Rand Road, and the
peti'ioners a-rchitect, Vincent S(,avo, presented the case
as t-he a-' 'h -:s be t -e
ng the abcve varlat,.cMr. -ns. Sca-c Commented he
thcu.�ht items'number one thru four were cleared up at the
I - - meeting. -man ` k I'
a�t ::o-ing meeting. Chairman
BasnL told h m Paul Be-'nar
e-.p!.Lain the reason for this eilli-est. Mr. K.amysz state,
he has purchased an additional 20' fr= Courtesy Home "enter
f^r ingress and egress at the rear of the property. He also
st;ltod ',at t:ith the additional dri't�-ay earlier Concerns
about access had been resolved. The one driveway has alread,,
been appro,,ed ho- i.D.O.T. for 24' from 36' which -, as
previously propos ' ed. Mr. 1:amysz feels he has met al' the
C -Odes, an-:� is Just gaiting for apprVval from the
Paul Be2nar, Planner for the Village, stated "he maln =c-arn
`he ':a,. ---'ng -a t,7,,uld increase 'raff!
"s
- i�i -, mv:e than a sit down restaurant. The deletion Of
the loaling zone tould be s ' atisfacv
tor -Y as long as de!IerieS
are mare when no customers are there. Paul also stated in
reference to the variation requests that the Village Board
denied the Special Use and rezoning but apprx.-ed the
-ar,
atiDn --or that reas. n, the petitioners have t.L present
their -ase again.
'hairman Basnik asked the petitioner to address the parking.
*,!r. S,,ay.: stated that. -4th the on Rand ad t, -.e
parking •,uld be 23 spaces. �Ir. Pretruceill questicnet! th__-
number :�' :ars in the drivpthr.; line �nclu,4_;ng t^= 7n -:u -
board. '-*:e felt• that cars wculd the Irivewa% and asked
;f the me -.. ,-board could be mov=! nioreeaEt-T,:ard to I�revent
this occurring. Mr. Petrucelli also commented on where 'he
storage was going to be, `Sr. Scavo replied since there is
basement th-- storage would be in the kitchen area but, would,
41ad1 put `!i a basement and aOL7 nc
additional seating if the
rove. Mr. Lannon questioned him. as to
—1-ld approve. wh.- he
,iid not request a variance for the basement. Mr. Scavo stated
the Vill-age Code would require additional for the
basement area, and this could rot be provIded on this site.
ZBA-28-Z-90
ZDA-29-SU-90
ZBA-30-V-90
APRIL 26,1990
Page 3 of 4
Chairman Basnik questioned as to what !find nd of fast-food
restaurant business this was to be. William the
,future tenant 'or the proposed buil,!�.g, stated .'!- wDuld be
just 111ie -kn% other fast-f-od establisn:r.ent e=ept no
ik also lhe
S cr "I -L- ,art cif the
restaurant. Mr. Kutsios said it would be on both. The
Chairman also asked if he had chosen a name and ,;hat the
hours would be. Mr. Kotsios stalled he has not chosen a name
lo
as of �e' and the hours will be ffrom,M`dn4ght.�
john H-=. , Ili --m., add-ressej t- 2--arl 4_th concerns
,n traffic. He feels that rezoning this parcel of land from a
P-3 to a B-4 i;culd increase the traffic on Rand Road allowing
people to drive down Isabella causing not onl-,' traffic
problems but also safety issues.
Peter Schuster, 303 N. William, addressed score questions to
the board. The approved driveway from I.D.O.T. would that be
strictly for in or out' He also questioned where it was to be
located on Rand Rd. As examples to the Board he suggested
that the Courtes-.- Home Center should be used as the main
entrance as in the Mount Prospect Plaza for Browns Chicken
and Wendys at Northpoint in Arlington Heights which are very
successful.
Mr. Lannon suggested that they lo, --k int: a left turn only-
condition
nlycondit-ion into and out of Rand Road. Paul interjected slating
that 1.D.O.'. had already approved the 24' on Rand
Road and this would create a "por:c _'-op" 11_. -pe of inter-
section. Mr. Lannon suggested a left turn on' -.. sign be put
up. Paul said that might solve the pr-blem. Pa:;l also
clarified that the Plan submitted 44"Perent than
the previously one submitted. _h.= P--a-m cn the Plan
indicates 1703 square ',Dctaz-z. Tu
1629 sqLare footage.
The =on4ng=na noted
a
that the ::�s p nt to the helf'd --earlier
concerns did not think -a -oroh ib i ion on turns would be
appropr'ate.
Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioners
request for rezoning of the property a' 72C E. Rand Rd. from
Cas-.-;dy moved, seconded by Mr. Brettrager to grant the
motion.
ZBA-28-Z-90
ZEA -29 -SU -90
2BA-30-V-90
April 26,1990
Page 4 of 4
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy,
Brettrager, O'May,,Basnik.
NAYS: None.
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioners
request for a Special Use to alloy a drive-thru, fast food
restaurant, subinct to the oetitioner to cooperate with the
Village Staff.
Mr. Cassidy moved, Mr. Brettrager seconded. Mr. Brettrager
also asked for a review on the menu -board location. Mi.
Lannon asked for a review on the left turn restriction.
Upon Roll Call: %YES: Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brettrager,
O'May, Basnik.
NkYS: Lannon.
Motion carried by a vote of 3-1.
rhairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioner
the following variations: Section 14.2002.A to allow a
13.5' front yard. Section 14.2002.E to allow a 3' side yard.
Ser -tion 14.2002.0 to allow a 5' rear yard. Section 14.3012 to
waive the requirement for a 12' x 35' delivery loading space.
Mr. Brettrager moved, Mr. Lannon seconded to grant the
motion.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy,
O'May, Basnik.
NAYS: None.
Motion carried by a ote of 5-O*.
These cases must still appear before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
`ALTA GE OF MOUNT PROSP&J
KAMM AM ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APP CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER 75E—��-
SUBJECT: ZBA.28-&", ZBA-29-SU.", ZBA-30-V-", JOHN KAMYSZ
(FORMER HONEYBEE RESTAURANT SITE)
LOCATION- 720 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE: APRIL 18, 19"
txEnrrprr
The applicant is requesting a rezoning for this property from B-3 to B-4 along with a special
use in order to allow a drive_thru, fast-food restaurant of 1,629 square feet. Also requested
are the following variations:
1. Section 14.2002A to allow an 13.5' front yard instead of 30' as required by Code.
2. Section 14.2002.11 to allow a 3' side yard instead of 10' as required by Code.
3. Section 14.2002.0 to allow a 5' rear yard instead of 20' as required by Code.
4. Section 14.3012 to waive the requirement for a 12'X35' delivery loading space.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMENTS
In reviewing this application, several comments were noted by the different staff
departments.
1. I.D.O.T. permits will be required for any work done on Rand Road right-of-way.
2. Grading and detention will have to be reviewed for the property. An interior
storm sewer system should be added eliminating sheet flow drainage onto Rand
Road.
3. New water and sanitary sewer service will be required depending upon volume
of water to be used. There is currently a 16" watermain on the northeast side of
Rand Road.
4. The handicap parking stalls as shown must not overhang into the drive-thru lane.
5. Engineering and building plans must be submitted for approval.
Gil Basnik • 2
April 18, 1990
6. All Development Code requirements must be met including sidewalks, parkway
trees, parking lot curbing, etc.
PLA&MJG AND ZONING COMMENTS
Bukground
As you may recall, Mr. Kamysz presented virtually this same plan to the Zoning Board of
Appeals one year ago. Two small changes have been made to last year's proposal. First,
the size of the building is now proposed at 1,629 square feet instead of 1,560 square feet.
Secondly, there is now an access drive connecting this property and the Courtesy parking
lot. The traffic flow from Rand Road in and out of this site was a major concern of both
Boards, last year. At last year's Zoning Board and Village Board hearings, it was noted by
several Board members that an additional access point into the Courtesy parking lot would
be of benefit to this proposal. The additional access drive was recently agreed upon by Mr.
Kamysz and the Courtesy Partnership, and was made a condition of the recent Courtesy
Home Center Planned Unit Development approval.
Please refer to the Planning and Zoning comments on the attached memo dated April 19,
1989 for a detailed analysis of this proposal. Most of the comments in this memo still
pertain to this current proposal. A condensed summary of this memo would read as
follows:
Our main concern with both the rezoning and special use request is the concern of
traffic. It is still our opinion that a d&_L-Ihnh fast-food restaurant will compound
the traffic problems in this area, and if this site were to be used for another type of
restaurant, we would anticipate improved traffic flow both on-site and off. As
another option, a larger sized parcel would afford more design flexibility thereby
improving traffic flow.
With the additional access point into the Courtesy parking lot, the traffic flow is better than
any of the other previous submissions. This extra acoess point will relieve many of the
potential traffic flow problems that were present with previous submissions. The
elimination of the drive-thm, facility and/or an increase in the size of the parcel, would
further help to alleviate some of the traffic concerns.
With reference to the requested variations, we have no MW" problems. A 15 foot setback
along Rand Road is adequate to provide for a decent landscape buffer, although a 30 foot
landscape buffer strip would have been more desirable. However, as a trade-off, the site
plan provides a nice triangular area at the southwest comer of this property. We would
prefer a 10 foot minimum rear yard setback in order to allow a trtinimum size planting area,
but this could only be accomplished with additional purchase of land from Courtesy. Both
the Zoning Board and Village Board had no objections to these same variations when
presented last year. The deletion of the delivery loading area from previous plans will not
present a problem, if deliveries are limited to certain off -times when customers are not
present.
PB:hg
Village a# Mount Prospect'-"
maum hosow, 1111rLt
WtROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: GIL BASNK ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN W.
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-Z-89, 20 -SU -89, 21-V-89, JOHN KAMYSZ
LOCATION: 720 EAST RAND ROAD (FORMER HONEY BEE RESTAURANT SITE)
DATE: APRIL 19, 1989
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting rezoning this parcel from"'B'-3 to B-4 along with a special use
to allow a drive-through fast-food restaurant of 1560 square feet. Also requested are the
following variations:
1. Section 14.2002.B to allow a 5' rear yard instead of 20' as required by Code
2. Section 14.2002A to allow a 13-1/2' front yard instead of 30' as required by
Code '
3. Section 14.2002.0 to allow a 3' side yard instead of 10' as required by Code.
In reviewing this application, several comments were noted by the different staff
departments. They are as follows:
1. IDOT permits will be required for any work done on Rand Road Right-of-
way.
2. Grading and detention will have to be reviewed for the property. An interior
storm sewer system should be added eliminating sheet flow drainage onto
Rand Road.
3. New water and sanitary sewer service will be required ceding upon vWume
of water to be used. There is currently a 16"water mainon the northeast side
of Rand Road.
4. All Development Code requirements must be met including sidewalks,
parkway trees, etc.
5. Engineering and building plans must be submitted for all buildings.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
April 19, 1989
This proposed fast-food drive-thru restaurant is to be located at the site of the former
Honey Bee Restaurant. The site is to be combined with a W wide strip of land to be
acquired from the Courtesy Home Center. This entire parcel is presently vacant and paved
with asphalt. As you may recall from previous 1986 and 1988 hearings, this site is
practically unbuildable on this odd -shaped IOL Therefore, Mr. Kamysz is a contract
purchaser of an additional 20' wide strip of land from the Courtesy Home Center in order
to attempt to meet the setback requirements and accommodate required parking and car
stacking spaces. However, even with the increased parcel size, all setback requirements by
Code have not been met.
The Comprehensive Plan identifies this parcel as being best suited for general
commercial/office. A fast-food restaurant falls within this category. The surrounding land
uses to the north, east, and west are all businesses. Single-family residential is located
across Rand Road. The staff windshield survey of Rand Road businesses identified five
fast-food restaurants, including three with drive -that facilities, and five sit-down restaurants,
from west of Elmhurst Road and continuing cut to Central He greatest concentration
of these restaurants occurs around the Kensington and Rand Road intersection. There are
also at least three other restaurants in nearby Mount Prospect Plaza.
In 1988, the Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation had a similar request for this property.
They requested rezoning, special use for a drive-thru and some variations to the setback
requirements. You may recall, they had contracted to purchase a 5V wide strip of land
from Courtesy Home Center in order to attempt to meet the setback requirements and
accommodate their parking. The proposed Kentucky Fried Chicken building was slightly
larger at 1,700 square feet. The staff memo regarding the 1988 request is attached for your
reference. A brief summary of the Village's main concerns of that previous proposal is as
follows:
h2'e were of the opinion that a dive-WrnnFjt_2
Mr. Kamyses new proposal for this property is similar in scope to the previous submission.
The differences are outlined as follows:
1. Mr. Kamysz is proposing one 36' wide driveway cut onto Rand Road, whereas
Kentucky Fried Chicken requested two =b cuts onto Rand and oneaccess point
iA• the Courtesy Parking Lot.
Kamysz has a contract to purchase a 2(Y wide strip of Land from Courtesy,
whereas Kentucky Fried Chicken proposed to purchase a 5W wide strip. As a resuJ4
Mr. Kamysz is requesting grea�ter variations to the setback requirements in the front
yarK and side yards.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
April 19, 1989
3. The design of Mr. KamySz'S proposal is such that more landscaped area is provided
at the southwest comer than the previous Kentucky Fried Chicken proposal.
However, less landscaping along Rand Road is provided on this new proposal
4. Mr. Kamysz proposes to build the proposed restaurant and lease the property to a
restaurant operator.
Our main concern with both the special zoning and special use request is the concern of
traffic. It is still our opinion that a drive-through fast-food restaurant will compound the
traffic problems in this area, and if this site were to be used for a fast-food restaurant
without a drive-through facility, we would anticipate improved traffic flow, both on-site and
off. As another option, a larger sized parcel would afford more design flexibility, thereby
improving traffic flow. However, it should be noted that the current request provides only
one driveway to Rand, solving a major objection to the Kentucky Fried Chicken request~
It would also be of benefit to have an additional access point into the Courtesy parking lot
property such as what was proposed on the Kentucky Fried Chicken site plan.
With reference to the requested variations, we have no � problem. A 15' setback along
Rand Road is adequate to provide for a decent landscape buffer although a 3W landscaped
buffer strip would have been more desirable. However, as a trade oM this site plan
provides a nice triangular area at the southwest comer of the property. We would prefer
a UY minimum rear yard setback in order to allow a minimum size planting area, but, this
could only be accomplished with additional purchase of more land from Courtesy.
In summary, the Village still has concerns with the traffic which will result from a drive-
through fast-food restaurant (mainly the off-site traffic). The elimination of the drive-
through facility and/or an increase in size in the parcel would help alleviate some of the
traffic concerns. The variations in yard setback, although passable, could be better if
additional land was provided.
LOM
0
90 ObVTTTA 9q4 90 saaqsraj go papog pup 4u9PTs9ad 9q4 'SVaUaHM
pup iqoadsoad qunoW go 9bPTTTA
aq4 JO s994sn"I 90 PJROS Pup 4uOPTs9ld aq4 04 UOT4VpU9UtMoO9j pup
SbUTPUTJ s4T P944Tmqns SRq STpeddv go papos buT
Uoz qqq 'sv3lHaHm
Pup :066T 'TTIdY
90 ARP q4OT 044 uo PTPaaH 40adsold qun5-14 9q4 UT P914STTqnd
u9eq bUTAetj J09a9tJ4 9OT40U aadoad pup anp o4
4uensand ;066T 'T*T-'dV
go AeP q49z eq4 uo 4oedsoad 4unoI4 go ObeTTTA Oq4 90 sTpaddV To
PaV09 bUTUOZ aq4 eao;eq 06 -Z -8Z '0$ asRo vgz go 4oaCqns aq4 bUTaq
buTuozaa iog 4sanbaa 944 UO P1914 SPM bUT
Peaq OTTqnd e lsvaHaHI4
Pup !40TJ4STG (90TtUOS PUe TTe49H SS9UTSng)
V-9 04 C-9 Uloij
pauozea aq A4aadoad 4oaLqns aq4 paisanbea seq* 29UOT4T49d 'SVqUaHM
pule
STOUTTTI 'A4unoo 3(000
UT 'f)UTUUTb9q JO 4UTod aqq o4 q993 SO -CZ 90 ODUV4STP JO
;DuTT le'buo*Tle 4s9mlq4nos eouaq4 :4UTod v oq qqqj TL-Tiz go
9OU124STP v _794-7pno 4samiq4noS aiq4 go aa4lpnO 4S9M144ION PTvs
JO 9UTT 4s9m 9lq4 q4Tm T9TTvand pup q4nos aoua144 :4UTod v
04 4999 0 -OZ JO 90UV4STP e aa4avno 4samq4nos pips 90 9UTT
T44 -IOU 9144 T44TM TaTTWEed 9uTl v buOTp 4SV9 9=9114:T T90,1p'd
90 jauaoo qsv9q4aou aq4 bt;Taq OsTP 4UTod PTes '4UTod P o4
49a3 LC*CSZ JO BOUV48TP V SE UOT409S go a9qapnb 4samiq4nos
9144 go ;Ea*4;[Rnb 4s8mq4-ION PTIes 90 9UTT 4s9m ;Dq4 buOTP q4JOu
9=9q4 !GC UOT408S go ja4alent5 4samq4nos aq4 go aeqaPnO
qsamtl4jou 9144 �O OuTT 4s6m 9q4 Pup PvOH abuea go 9uTT Apm
-go-4qbTa AT294spq 'aq4 JO UOT4O9Sa94UT
9144 4P bUTuUT599
:SMOTTOJ sv paqTaosep
6C9VL9TZ a9quInN '4U9UMOo(1 Sp 'TL6T 18T ZESW400 PBPI0092
joaaatI4 4vTd 9144 o4 buTpj000p ueTPTaON TpdTOUTad P2Tql
aq4 go qspa 'TT 9bueU IT4qaoN zv dTqsumoj ISC' uo*-rqoaS';o
aa4aeno qsamlqqnos aq4 go 4apd go UOTSTATpqns P l4oadsoaa
4unow o4 UOT4TPPV &Sasaau go4 ori 1o -4zEed -41eq-4
v OsTV
Z 1902pa
TLZZZLZ 29qulnN Wamnoo(l Sv 'CL6T 19T zraqo4o0 uo
STOUTTTI IA4uno0 3joo0 go s9T4TL go aeaqs-rbea eq -4 90 9C)T330
9144 uT Paa94sTbOl J09aOt4 4vTd wq4 oq bt;Tpa000v I (JoqaaT44
;9UTT 4sP9 9TT4 uo peanspam se4joiaaaT4 4993 OOT 144 -TOR
qlqq 4daoxa) PeOH PUVH JO 9UTja9-4U90 9q4 90 ATa94sR9 buTAT
'UPTPTa9K TedTOUT-TCI PITtiLl 9
dTq;umol 'VE uOT* q4 JO 4sva 'TT 9buv'd 'q4aOX ZV
.409S go aq4apno 4spaqqnos aqq go aaqapno
4spelq4aoN 9T44 go 4apd 4eqq go UOTSTATpqnS zsAuPH JO T 4OU
:T T90JVd
:sle paqTaOs9P
ATTPb9T I(Aqaadoad qoalqns ss oq paaaajaa a94jpuTaaqq) pvo-d pupa
4SP9 OZL Se UMOUX ATUOULMOD A4aadoad auozaa 04 UOT4POTTdde up P9TT3
SPq (a9UOT4T40d SV 04 P9aa639a aSq3PUT9.2814) ZSXUlle>j 'UlqOf 'SVaHaHt4
avou am Lsv2 o z t. alu ox smivim ti sy
iomisia (aoimas GKv uivmaa ssaxisna) v -q oi c -a
WO'dJ ALIUMOHd KIVIUaO aO VNINOZ ally 01 10adSaU
HIIM dVX ONINOZ fIVIDIadO ally DNIGNaKV aONVNIGHO KV
,oN aoNvNia*do
06/%Z/9
law)
ZBA 28-Z-90
Page 2 of 2
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA
28-Z-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village
of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT -AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this ordinance to
an B-4 (Business Retail and Service) District.
SECTION FOUR: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
0
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 720 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, John Kamysz (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property
commonly known as 720 East Rand Road (hereinafter referred to as
the Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Parcel 1:
Lot 1 of Kamysz Subdivision of that part of the Northeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township
42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
lying easterly of the centerline of Rand Road (except the
North 100 feet thereof, as measured on the east line
thereof) , according to the plat thereof registered in the
Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois
on October 15, 1973, as Document Number 2722271
Parcel 2
Also that part of Lot A of Reeses I Addition to Mount
Prospect, a subdivision of part of the Southwest Quarter
of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian according to the plat thereof
recorded October 18, 1971, as Document Number 21674639
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the easterly right-of-
way line of Range Road and the west line of the northwest
Quarter of the southwest Quarter of Section 35; thence
north along the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the
southwest quarter of Section 35 a distance of 253.37 feet
to a point, said point also being the northeast corner of
Parcel 1; thence east along a line parallel with the north
line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 20.0 feet to
a point: thence south and parallel with the west line of
said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance
of 241.71 feet to a point: thence Southwest along a line
of distance of 23.05 feet to the point of beginning, in
Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use to permit a drive-thru
facility in conjunction with the Class IV restaurant located on the
subject property; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 29 -SU -90) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of April,
1990, pursuant to proper legal notice having been published in the
Mount Prospect Herald on the loth day of April, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in
support of the request being the subject of ZBA 29 -SU -90; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and
ZBA 29 -SU -90
Page 2 of 2
have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village
and that the granting of the proposed Special Use would be in the
best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: -The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Special Use to the subject
property to permit a drive-through facility for a Class IV
restaurant the B-4 zoning district. This approval is subject to
the restaurant being constructed with face brick on all four sides.
SECTION THREE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
%W*PF
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
a
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF
5/25/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 720 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, John Kamysz (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed an application for variations from Chapter 14 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for property commonly known as
720 East Rand Road (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property),
legally described as:
Parcel 1:
Lot 1 of Kamysz Subdivision of that part of the Northeast
Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 34, Township
42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
lying easterly of the centerline of Rand Road (except the
North 100 feet thereof, as measured on the east line
thereof) , according to the plat thereof registered in the
Office of the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, Illinois
on October 15, 1973, as Document Number 2722271
Parcel 2
Also that part of Lot A of Reeses I Addition to Mount
Prospect, a subdivision of part of the Southwest Quarter
of Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian according to the plat thereof
recorded October 18, 1971, as Document Number 21674639
described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the easterly right-of-
way line of Range Road and the west line of the northwest
Quarter of the southwest Quarter of Section 35; thence
north along the west line of said Northwest Quarter of the
southwest quartet of Section 35 a distance of 253.37 feet
to a point, said point also being the northeast corner of
Parcel 1; thence east along a line parallel with the north
line of said Southwest Quarter a distance of 20.0 feet to
a point: thence south and parallel with the west line of
said Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter a distance
of 241.71 feet to a point: thence Southwest along a line
of distance of 23.05 feet to the point of beginning, in
Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks the following variations:
1.
A variation from Section
14.2002.A
to allow a front yard
setback of thirteen feet
six inches
(131 611), instead of
the required 301;
2.
A variation from Section
14.2002.B
to allow a three foot
(31) side yard setback, instead of
the required 101;
3.
A variation from Section
14.2002.0
to allow a rear yard
setback of five feet (51),
instead
of the required 201;
4.
A variation from 14.3012
to eliminate the required 121
x 351 delivery loading space; and
E
ZBA 30-V-90
Page 2 of 3
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 30-V-90 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 26th day of
April, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of April, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 30-V-90 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the
following:
1.
A variation from Section
14.2002.A
to allow a front yard
setback of thirteen feet
six inches
(131 611), instead of
the required 301;
2.
A variation from Section
14.2002.E
to allow a three foot
(31) side yard setback, instead of
the required 101;
3.
A variation from Section
14.2002.0
to allow a rear yard
setback of five feet (51),
instead
of the required 201;
and
4.
A variation from 14.3012
to eliminate the required 121
x 351 delivery loading space.
SECTION THREE: That the site plan, including the landscape design,
for the development of the Subject Property, is attached hereto and
hereby made a part here of as Exhibit "A".
SECTION FOUR: Except for the variations granted herein and the
Special Use granted in ordinance No. , all other applicable
Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations shall remain
in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FIVE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and Void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION SIX: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from
ZBA 30-V-90
Page 3 of 3
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
W
,1989.
CAF
6/11/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN A$ 404 NORTH PROSPECT MANO
WHEREAS, Robert and Kathleen Beaderstadt (hereinafter referred to
as Petitioners) have filed an application for a variation from
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for
property commonly known as 404 North Prospect Manor (hereinafter
referred to as Subject Property), legally described as•
Lot 9 in Block 6 in Prospect Manor, a subdivision of the South
3/4 of the West 1/2 of the West 1/2 of Section 34, Township
42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal meridian, Cook
County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner seek a variation from Section 14.102.B.2 to
permit a two foot 6 inch (21 611) side yard setback, instead of the
required 5 feet; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 34-V-90 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of May,
1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in the
Mount Prospect Herald on the 8th day of May, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
being the subject of ZBA 34-V-90 and have determined that the best
interests of the Village of Mount Prospect would be served by
granting said variations.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102.B.2 to permit a 2 foot 6 inch (21 611) set yard
setback for a detached garage, subject to the installation of
gutters with downspouts located in compliance with Village
regulations.
SECTION THREE: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted herein
shall be null and void unless permits are issued and construction
begins within one (1) year from the date of passage of this
Ordinance.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
A
ZBA 34-V-90
Page 2 of 2
and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form
in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT•
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
6/7/90
A1110114z %I, Do"* �
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 105 NORTH WAVERLY PLACE
WHEREAS, Raymond and Barbara Esquibel (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have, filed an application for a variation from
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for
property commonly known as 105 North Waverly Place (hereinafter
referred to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 26 in Block 3 in Central Wood, being a subdivision of
the following described land: Beginning at the Southeast
corn of the West 1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of Section 33,
Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian; thence west along the south line of said Section
33, a distance of 14.82 chains, or 978.12 feet; thence
north along a line parallel to the east line of the west
1/2 of the Southeast 1/4 of said Section 33 to the
Southerly line of the right-of-way of the Chicago and
Northwestern Roadroad; thence Southeasterly along said
right-of-way to the east line of the West 1/2 of the
Southeast 1/4 of said Section 33; thence south along last
mentioned line to the place of beginning, in Cook County,
Illinois
"TI -1
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.1102.E of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to allow an
impervious lot surface coverage of 57%, instead of the permitted
maximum of 45%; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 37-V-90 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 24th day of
May, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published in
the Molapt Prospect Herald on the 8th day of May, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards
set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the
Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would
be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as
specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant a variation from Section 14.1102.E
to allow an impervious surface lot coverage of 57% in order to
construct a wooden deck.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
I
ZBA 37-V-90
Page 2 of 2
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE; This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
FMA
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
6/7/90
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 14
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect, through its administration,
(hereinafter referred to as "Petitioner"), has filed an application
for text amendments to specified Sections of Chapter 14 entitled
"Zoning ordinance"; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for a text
amendments, being the subject of ZBA Case No. 25-A-90, before the
Zoning Board of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the
24th day of May, 1990, pursuant to due and proper legal notice
thereof published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of
April, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect have further considered the text
amendment requested and find that it would be in the best interest
of the Village to grant the request being the subject of
ZBA 25-A-90.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That Section 14.2602 entitled "Rules and Definitions"
of Chapter 14 (Zoning ordinance) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by amending the
paragraphs E and J under the definition of "Yard"; so that
hereinafter said paragraphs E and J under definition of "Yard" of
Section 14.2602 shall be and read as follows:
E. Chimneys, flues, belt courses, leaders, sills, pilasters,
lintels, ornamental features, cornices, eaves, and
gutters projecting eighteen inches (1811) from an exterior
wall.
J. Recreational equipment, except in the front yard, however
basketball standards shall be permitted in the front
yard. to
SECTION THREE: That the following Sections of Chapter 14 (Zoning
Ordinance) , as amended, are hereby further amended by deleting
therefrom the wording "and other ordinary projections":
Section 14.1702.D.2
Section 14.1002.D.2 Section 14.1802.D.2
Section 14.1102.D.2 Section 14.1902.D.2
Section 12.1202.D.2 Section 14.2002.D.2
Section 14.1302.D.2 Section 14.2102.D.2
Section 14.1402.D.2 Section 14.2202.D.2
Section 14.1503.D.2
M
tBA 25-A-90
Page 2 of 2
SECTION FOM I That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
/caf
5/30/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDIANCE CREATING CHAPTER 15 ENTITLED "LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE"
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, in order to promote aesthetic compatibility among land
uses in the Village of Mount Prospect, the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect have determine that the
best interest of the Village would be served by adopting a
"Landscape ordinance".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
SECTION ONE: That the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended,
is hereby further amended by creating Chapter 15 entitled
"Landscape Ordinance"; so that hereinafter said Chapter 15 of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect shall be and read as follows:
y
Chapter 15
Page 2 of 24
LANDSCAPE ORDINANCE
Section
15.101.
Intent and Purpose
Section
15.201.
Definition
Section
15.301.
Landscape Plan
Section
15.401.
Design Criteria
Section
15.501.
Right -of -Way Landscaping
Section
15.601.
Parking Lot Landscaping
Section
15.701.
Foundation Landscaping
Section
15.801.
Perimeter Landscaping
Section
15.901.
Tree Preservation
Chapter 15
Page 3 of 24
ARTICLE I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
Section 15.101. Intent and Purpose
Section 15.101. Intent and Purpose. The purpose of these
landscape requirements is to promote, protect and
preserve the general health and safety of the people of the
community and, as part of the general welfare, insure aesthetic
compatibility among land uses within the community. These
regulations are intended to minimize the harmful or nuisance
effects resulting from noise, dust, debris, motor headlight glare,
artificial light intrusions, objectionable sights or activities,
or similar incompatible impacts conducted or created by adjoining
or nearby land use.
It is also the purpose of these regulations to safeguard the
environmental quality and aesthetic character of the community by
limiting the removal and insuring replacement of trees upon private
property within the Village. These regulations are intended to
preserve insofar as practical, existing vegetation and
topographical features by limiting unnecessary clearing and
modification of land, encouraging the retention of existing mature
trees, requiring the replacement of indigenous trees with approved
species, and encouraging the energy efficient operation of land
uses in the public interest. These requiredments are also to
further the general provisions of landscaping as set forth in
Section16.408 of the Chapter 16 (Development Code) of the Village
Code.
Landscaping required by the Chapter shall be a condition to the
issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for any improvements built
on the suject property.
Chapger 15
Page 4 of 24
ARTICLE II
DEFINITIONS
Section 15.201. Definitions
Section 15.201. Definitions. For the purpose of this Code,
certain terms and words are hereby defined;
words used in the singular shall include the plural, and the plural
and singular; the work "shall" is mandatory; the work "may" is
permissive. -
BANK: Slope steeper than 3:1 (H*V) formed as a single plane
by mechanical cut or fill grading operations.
BERMS: Soil of good quality, uncompacted, raised generally
above the surrounding finish grade with side slopes generally
no steeper than 3:1 (H:V). Generally a man-made slope.
CALIPER: The diameter of a tree trunk 611 above the existing
grade or proposed planted grade and in conformance with the
provisions of the Code of standards (260.1-1986 or latest
version) published by the American Association of Nurserymen,
Inc.
CLUSTER: Plant material installed as a clump or group as
opposed to individual specimens.
DECIDUOUS: Plants which do not retain leaves or needles
during the winter season of the year.
DRIP LINE: The zone lying between the trunk of a tree or
shrub and the extreme outer edge of the leaf and branch
structure, i.e., the diameter of the leaf and branch structure
extended vertically down to the soil surface.
EVERGREEN: Plants which continuously retain leaves or needles
over four seasons of the year.
GROUND COVERS: Woody or non -woody plants with a maintained
or unmaintained average mature height less than 12".
HEIGHT: Reference to the total finished height of a structure
Chapter 15
Page 5 of 24
or general mature height of plant materials installed above
the adjacent elevation of soil or paving. Specified height
of a screening may be provided by a berm, combination of a
berm and planting, or a structure unless otherwise specified
herein.
LOW GROWTH SHRUBS: A woody shrub with a maintained or
unmaintained average mature height of 3 feet or less.
ORNAMENTAL TREE: A tree with an unmaintained average mature
height less than 20 feet. Flowers, fall color, and
interesting growth habits are characteristic of these trees.
SCREEN: A structure or planting composed of sufficient
material to obstruct vision beyond the screen. Generally, but
not always, a screen is intended to provide in excess of 90%
opaque obstruction to vision during all seasons of the year.
SHADE TREE: A large tree of standard growth habit with an
average mature height in excess of 20 feet. The main purpose
of this type of tree in landscape designs is to provide shade
and scale against buildings.
SHRUB: A branched woody plant with an unmaintained average
mature height less than 8 feet.
SIGHT TRIANGLE: A triangular area established on private
property at the intersection of two (2) streets or a street
and a driveway in which nothing shall be erected, planted, or
allowed to grow so as to limit or obstruct the sight distance
of motorists. The area from 3 feet to 8 feet above grade is
to be free and clear of any obstructions. Such a triangle
shall have legs of twenty-five feet (251) along the rights-
of-way when two streets intersect and ten feet (101) along the
right-of-way and driveway when a street and driveway
intersect.
STREET TREE: A tree of standard growth habit acceptable to
the Village of Mount Prospect for installing within the public
right-of-way.
TERRACE: A landscape treatment of mounded earth, rock wall,
railroad tie wall or other retaining device used to modify
steep grade differences on a lot. A terrace shall not include
a patio or deck surface.
Chapter 15
Page 6 of 24
ARTICLE III
LANDSCAPE PLAN
Section 15.301. Landscape Plan Requirement
Section 15.302. Content of Landscape Plan
Section 15.301. Landscape Plan Requirement. A Landscape Plan
shall be required and approved by the Director
of Planning and Zoning for the following:
A. Any non-residential development of any parcel of land
involving the construction of any new building(s) or
structure(s).
B. Any multi -family residential development and/or residential
P.U.D.
C. Any development involving expansion by more than twenty-five
percent (25%) of an existing structure, if constructed after
the effective date of this ordinance.
The Plan shall be completed by a Landscape Architect or a person
capable of fulfilling all requirements set forth in this ordinance.
Requests for relief or revisions to these requirements of this
ordinance may be submitted to the Village Manager for his
consideration.
Section 15.302. Content of Landscape Plan.
A. Elements of the Preliminary Landscape Plan -
1. Show the proposed location of all new plant materials.
2. Indicate the character of suggested plant materials to
be used (i.e. shade trees, ornamental trees, shrubbery,
etc.)
3. A tree survey shall be prepared which lists the location
of existing vegetation (411 caliper and above) with sizes
and species (common and botanical names) recorded.
Chapter 15
Page 7 of 24
Indicate on the plan those plant materials to be preserved,
removed or transplanted.
4. Proposals to protect and preserve existing trees during
and after construction.
5. Location of existing natural site features, including,
but not limited to, large boulders, rock outcroppings and
streams.
B. Elements of a Final Landscape Plan -
1. Locations of existing and proposed improvements:
a. Building outlines,.with entry and exit points.
b. All utilities.
C. Lighting.
d. Walls.
e. Fences.
f. Parking areas (spaces delineated, including
handicapped spaces, curbs).
9. Spot elevations and/or contours existing and
proposed.
h. Berms.
i. Existing (411 caliper and above with drip line) and
proposed plant material.
j. Paved surfaces.
k. Sign locations.
1. Public rights-of-way/easements, including
street widths.
M. Refuse disposal areas.
n. Other exterior landscape amenities, such as
bike paths, plazas, etc.
0. Property lines.
2. Planting schedule:
a. Plant material schedule, listing: botanical names;
common names; caliper or height; and quantity.
b. Plant material schedule of all trees (411 caliper and
above) to be removed, listing: botanical names;
common names; caliper or height; and quantity.
3. Miscellaneous:
a. Proposed treatment of all ground surfaces (pea
gravel, ground covers, sod, seed and/or prairie).
b. other drawings and information as required:
Chapter 15
Page 8 of 24
(1) Irrigation plan, if appropriate.
(2) Grading and drainage plan, showing spot
elevations and/or cross sections.
C. Methods to be used to protect plants and planted
areas (curbs, ties, walls, etc.).
4. Title block:
a. Name and address of property owner.
b. Name of Landscape Architect.
C. Firm name and address.
d. Scale data.
e. North arrow.
f. Date.
5. Provide the following - Elevations, cross sections,
samples and/or photographs to indicate:
a. Texture of exposed surfaces.
b. Landscape material.
C. Scale.
d. Color of exposed surfaces.
e. Planting in relation to buildings.
6. Provide the following - Technical information, samples,
details and/or photographs of materials to be used:
a.
Light standards.
b.
Benches.
C.
Fences.
d.
Walls.
e.
Signage.
f.
Safety lighting.
9-
other site details.
Chapter 15
Page 9 of 24
ARTICLE IV
DESIGN CRITERIA
Section
15.401.
Scale and Nature of Landscape Material
Section
15.402.
Selection of Plant Material
Section
15.403.
Installation of Plant Material
Section
15.404.
Maintenance of Plant Material
Section
15.405.
Planting Beds
Section
15.406.
Walls and Fences
Section
15.407.
Detention/Retention Basins and Ponds
Section
15.408.
Energy Conservation
Section
15.409.
Berming
Section
15.410.
Topography
Section
15.411.
Protection of Plant Material and/or People
Section
15.412.
Areas Where Plant Material Will Not Prosper
Section
15.413.
Exterior Landscape Lighting
Section
15.414.
Amenities
Section
15.415.
Service Yard Screening
Section
15.416.
Innovative Landscaping
Section 15.401. Scale and Nature of Landscape material. The
scale and nature of landscape material shall be
appropriate to the site and structures.
Section 15.402. Election of Plant Material.
A. Planting materials used in conformance with the provisions of
this Article shall be:
1 of good quality of a species normally grown in
Northeastern Illinois.
2. Capable of withstanding the extremes of individual site
microclimates.
3. Selected for interest in its structure, texture, and
color for its ultimate growth.
4. Harmonious to the design, and of good appearance.
5. In conformance with American Standard for nursery stock
as approved by American National Standards Institute and
issued as ANSI 2601.1986.
Chapter 15
Page 10 of 24
B. Evergreens shall be incorporated into the landscape treatment
of a site, particularly in those areas screening parking lots
from dedicated public rights-of-way or property zoned for
residential use.
C. Shade trees shall have a minimum trunk size of 2-1/211 in
caliper.
D. Ornamental trees shall be used, especially in smaller planting
areas. These trees shall have a minimum trunk size of 211 in
caliper, or be a clump form at a minimum height of five (5)
feet.
E. Shrubs shall be used wherever possible. Shrubs used for
parking lot screening shall be a minimum of three (3) feet in
height at time of installation. Low growth shrubs shall be
planted in areas which could constitute a visual hazard, i.e.,
site triangle.
F. The following trees shall not be used: Silver Maple; Box
Elder; Red Mulberry; Osage Orange; Poplar (all species) ;
Black Locust; Weeping Willow (except in large, wet areas) ;
Catalpa; Tree of Heaven; White Birch; Elm (all species) ;
Russian Olive and Mountain Ash.
Section 15.403. Installation of Plant Materials. Plant materials
of all types and species shall be installed in
accordance with the minimum technical specifications of the
Illinois Landscape Contractors Association, including the guarantee
and replacement sections.
Section -15.404. Maintenance of Plant Material. The owner of
the premises shall be responsible for the
maintenance, repair and replacement of all landscaping materials
and barriers, including refuse disposal areas, walls, fences, etc.,
as may be required by the provisions of this Article. A means of
irrigating plant material shall be provided. Installation of an
au--omatic underground sprinkling system is recommended.
Section 15.405. Planting Beds. Planting Beds shall be mulched
in their entirety with shredded bark or other
similar material.
Section I5.406. Walls and Fences. Plant materials shall be
placed intermittently against long expanses of building
walls, fences and other barriers to create a softening effect.
Chapter 15
Page 11 of 24
Section 15.407. Detention/Retention Basins and Ponds. Detention/
retention basins and pond areas shall be planted.
Such plantings shall include shade and ornamental trees,
evergreens, shrubbery, hedges and/or other live planting materials.
Plants must be able to tolerate wet conditions if planted within
the basin.
Section 15.408. Energy Conservation.
A. Deciduous trees, shrubs and vines should dominate the south
and west sides of buildings and plaza areas to provide shade
during the summer and limited shade during winter.
B. Evergreens and other plant materials should be concentrated
on the north side of buildings in a manner which dissipates
the effect of winter winds.
Section 15.409. Berming. Earthen berms and existing topography
shall, wherever practical, be incorporated into
the landscape treatment of a site.
Section 15.410. Topography. Where natural, existing topographic
patterns contribute to the beauty and utility of
a development, they shall be preserved and developed. Modification
of topography may be allowed where it contributes to the aesthetic
quality of the site.
Section 15.411. Protection of Plant Material and/or People. In
locations where plant material and/or people will
be susceptible to injury, install appropriate curbs, tree guards,
or other devices.
Section 15.412. Areas Where Plant Material Will Not Prosper. In
areas where general planting will not prosper,
other materials (such as fences, wall and pavings of wood, brick,
stone, pea gravel, and cobbles) shall be used. Carefully selected
plant material shall be combined with such materials where
possible.
Section 15.413. Exterior Landscape Lighting. Exterior landscape
lighting, when used, shall enhance the building
design and the adjoining landscape. Lighting standards and
fixtures shall be of a size and design compatible with the building
and adjacent areas. Lighting shall be restrained in design, and
excessive brightness and brilliant colors shall be avoided.
Utility services shall be underground.
Chapter 15
Page 12 of 24
Section 15.414. Amenities. In commercial/industrial areas the
following, where appropriate, shall be provided:
Seating areas; paved areas; plant enclosures; benches; waste
receptacles; lights; etc.
Section 15.415. Service Yard Screening. Service yards, loading
docks and other places that tend to be unsightly
shall be screened. Screening shall be equally effective at all
times of the year.
Section 15.416. Innovative Landscaping. Innovative landscaping
treatments are encouraged and shall be considered
as a positive attribute in connection with any request for a
variation from the requirements of this Code.
Chapter 15
Page 13 of 24
ARTICLE V
RIGHT-OF-WAY LANDSCAPING
Section 15.501. Applicability
Section 15.502. Street Trees
Section 15.503: Graded and Sodded
Section 15.501. Applicability. Where a parcel abuts a dedicated
public right-of-way, plantings shall be provided
within the provisions of this Article.
Section 15.502. Street Trees. Trees shall be planted in all
parkways and shall be placed subject to the direction
and approval of the Village. The Village shall be responsible for
the purchasing and planting of all trees within and upon the public
right of way.
A. Parkway trees shall be planted forty feet (401) apart whenever
possible, and shall have a minimum trunk diameter of two and
one-half (2-1/211) measured at six inches (611) above ground
level.
B. Planting Requirements: All trees planted within a public
right of way shall comply with the requirements set forth in
Chapter 9, Article V (Trees) of the Municipal Code.
C. Tree Planting by Village : The applicant shall, prior to
final plat or development plan approval, post with the
Director of Management Services a cash deposit or treasurer's
or cashier's check payable to the Village in an amount equal
to the number of trees required to be planted in the public
parkway pursuant to this Section multiplied by the amount
charged by the Village to cover the cost of such trees, and
any and all work connected with the guaranteed planting of
such trees as such amount is established from time to time by
resolution of the corporate authorities of the Village. The
Village shall use such funds to plant trees in the parkway.
D. If deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works, this
requirement may be satisfied if an equivalent number of trees
of the same size or larger are planted in the front yards of
all adjoining lots.
Chapter 15
Page 14 of 24
E. Should completion of the development extend beyond a one year
period, the applicant shall be required to post additional
funds to cover any increase in cost to plant the remaining
trees.
Section 15.503. Graded and sodded.
A. All unpaved areas within the dedicated right of way shall be
graded and sodded in an approved manner. Restoration work
shall be performed to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works.
B. All parkways shall be graded smooth and topped with at least
four inches (411) of black dirt after compacting and removal
of stumps, trees that cannot be saved, boulders and such.
Such areas shall be sodded.
C. Upon recommendation of the Director of Public Works, the
President and Board of Trustees of the village may require
additional sodding of a lot to prevent soil erosion and
blockage of drainage system.
Chapter 15
Page 15 of 24
Section 15.601.
Section 15.602.
Section 15.603.
ARTICLE VI
PARKING LOT LANDSCAPING
Applicability
Interior Plantings
Perimeter Landscaping
Section 15.601. Applicability. All parking lots designed for
twenty (20) or more parking spaces shall be
planted in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
Section 15.602. Interior Plantings.
A. Five (5) percent or more of the interior of a parking lot
shall be devoted to plantings. Planting of areas located
along the perimeter of a parking lot as required in Article
8 shall not be included toward satisfying this requirement.
Moreover, foundation landscaping areas, as specified in
Article 7 shall not be included toward satisfying the interior
parking lot landscaping requirements.
B. Planting Areas:
1. Interior parking lot planting areas shall generally be
dispersed throughout the parking.
2. Interior parking lot landscaping areas shall be a minimum
of sixty-four (64) square feet.
C". The primary planting materials used in parking lots shall be
shade trees. Ornamental trees, shrubbery, hedges, and other
live planting materials may be used to supplement the tree
planting, but shall not be the sole contribution to the
landscaping. Plants which have proven to be the most tolerant
of salt are recommended. These include Bayberry, Rugosa Rose,
Dwarf Kim Lilac and Polygonium ground cover. When using
evergreens, the planting beds shall be bermed, planting the
evergreens on higher grounds. There shall be at least 50
percent live coverage.
Section 15.603. Perimeter Landscaping.
A. Front and Corner Side Yards:
Chapter 15
Pace 16 of 24
1. Across from Residential Property:
a. where a parking lot is located across a street from
property zoned for residential use, continuous
landscaping shall be provided across one hundred
percent (100%) of the street frontage to a height
of three (3) feet. Such landscaping shall consist
of berms, shade and ornamental trees, evergreens,
shrubbery, hedges, and/or other live planting
material.
b. Except where occupied by planting beds, all
landscaping areas located in front and corner side
yards shall be sodded.
B. Rear and Interior Side Yards:
1. Where a parking lot abuts property zoned for residential
use, landscaping shall be provided as follows:
a. The screen/buffer area between the parking lot and
the residential property line shall be a minimum of
six (6) feet in height.
b. Shade trees shall be provided at the equivalent of
not more than fifty (50) feet apart.
C. Other planting material, including ornamental trees,
evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and/or other live
planting materials shall be provided at intermittent
locations, covering at least 75% of the frontage.
d. Except where occupied by planting beds, all side and
rear yard perimeter landscaping area shall be sodded
or seeded.
2. Abutting Non -Residential Property:
a. Where a parking lot abuts property zoned for non-
residential use, landscaping shall be provided
across fifty percent (50%) of that portion of the
parking lot abutting the property line to a minimum
height of three (3) feet. Such landscaping shall
consist of berms, shade and ornamental trees,
evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and/or other live
planting materials. Plantings may be placed in
clusters, containing seven (7) to nine (9) shrubs
per cluster, spaced at intervals of approximately
thirty-five (35) feet along the property line.
Chapter 15
Page 17 of 24
b. Except where occupied by planting beds, all side and
rear yard perimeter landscaping areas shall be
sodded or seeded.
Chapter 15
Page 18 of 24
ARTICLE VII
FOUNDATION LANDSCAPING
Section 15.701. Setback
Section 15.702. Coverage
Section 15.703. Landscaping Materials
Section 15.704. Ground Cover
Section 15.701. Setback. A landscaping area a minimum of ten (10)
feet in width shall be located around the
perimeter of all buildings.
Section 15.702. Coverage. Required foundation landscaping areas
shall remain open and free of all paving except
where walks to buildings and other similar paving is required.
Section 15.703. Landscaping Materials. Foundation landscaping
shall be provided for all buildings. Such
landscaping shall consist of shade and ornamental trees,
evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and/or other live planting
materials. Particular attention shall be paid toward screening
mechanical equipment, bicycle parking areas, and loading docks;
softening large expanses of building walls; and accenting entrances
and architectural features.
Section 15.704. Ground Cover. Except where occupied by planting
beds, all foundation landscaping areas shall be
sodded.
Chapter 15
Page 19 of 24
ARTICLE VIII
PERIMETER LANDSCAPING
Section
15.801.
Applicability
Section
15.802.
Non -Residential
Property Abutting Non -
Residential Property
Section
15.803.
Non -Residential
Property Abutting Residential
Property
Section
15.804.
Multiple Family
Residential Property
Section
15.805.
screening of Refuse Disposal Areas
Section 15.801. Applicability. All non-residential and multiple
family developments shall provide perimeter
landscaping in accordance with the provisions of this Article.
When a parking lot is located on the perimeter, the requirements
of Article 6, parking lot landscaping, shall be adhered to.
Section 15.802. Non -Residential Property Abutting Non -Residential
Property.
Where non-residential property abuts property
zoned for non-residential use, landscaping shall be provided as
follows:
A. Shade trees shall be provided at the equivalent of seventy-
five (75) feet apart along the abutting property line. Such
trees may be clustered or spaced linearly as determined
appropriate.
B. Other landscaping materials, including berms, ornamental
trees, evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and/or other live
planting materials shall be provided at appropriate locations
along the abutting property line.
C. Except where occupied by planting beds, all perimeter
landscaping areas shall be sodded or seeded.
Section 15.803. Non -Residential Property Abutting Residential
Property.
Where non-residential property abuts property
zoned for residential use, landscaping shall be provided as
follows:
Chapter 15
Page 20 of 24
A. In addition to the required fencing, landscaping shall consist
of berms, trees, evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and/or other
live planting materials.
B. Shade trees shall be provided at the equivalent of not more
than seventy-five (75) feet apart along the abutting property
line. Such trees may be clustered or spaced linearly as
determined appropriate.
C. Except where occupied by planting beds, all perimeter
landscaping areas shall be sodded or seeded.
Section 15.804. Multiple Family Residential Property. Where
multiple family residential property abuts other
property, landscaping shall be provided as follows:
A. Shade trees shall be provided at the equivalent of not more
than seventy-five (75) feet apart along the abutting property
line. Such trees may be clustered or spaced linearly as
appropriate.
B. other landscaping materials, including berms, if possible,
ornamental trees, evergreens, shrubbery, hedges, and/or other
live planting materials shall be provided at intermittent
locations across fifty percent (50%) of the abutting property
line. Shrubs shall be placed in clusters containing seven (7)
to nine (9) per cluster, spaced at intervals of approximately
thirty-five (35) feet along the abutting property line.
C. Except where occupied by planting beds, all perimeter
landscaping areas shall be sodded or seeded.
Section 15.805. Screening of Refuse Disposal Areas. All refuse
disposal areas shall be screened on at least three
(3) sides by a solid wood fence or an equivalent screening material
to a height of six (6) feet.
Chapter 15
Page 21 of 24
TREE PRESERVATION
Section 15.901. Tree Removal Procedure
Section 15.902. Protection of Existing Trees
Section 15.901. Tree Removal Procedure.
A. No tree having a caliper of four (4) inches or greater shall
be removed from any proposed development site prior to final
Site Plan approval without meeting the requirements of this
section. This Section does not apply to tree removal by
individual homeowners on private property. Section 9.502
provides standards for removal of public property trees.
B. The application for tree removal shall be accompanied by:
1. A written statement indicating the reason for removal of
the tree.
2. A general description of the tree to be removed.
3. A tree survey of the general area (as determined by the
Department of Planning and Zoning) surrounding the tree
to be removed. The tree survey shall consist of trees
411 caliper and above and include a listing of species.
4. Arguments for removal under 9-1.C.3 and 9-1.C.4 shall be
accompanied by a report from an arborist if requested by
the Department of Planning and Zoning.
C. The Village of Mount Prospect shall approve an application for
tree removal if one (1) or more of the following conditions
is present:
1. It is necessary to remove a tree which poses a safety
hazard to pedestrian or vehicular traffic or threatens
to cause disruption of public safety.
2. It is necessary to remove a tree which poses a safety
hazard to structures.
3. It is necessary to remove a tree which is diseased or has
been weakened by age, storm, fire or other injury.
Chapter 15
Page 22 of 24
4. It is necessary to observe good forestry practice, i.e.,
the number of healthy trees a given parcel of land will
support.
D. When a tree removal is occasioned by any development or land
use requiring the submission of a Site Plan, or Subdivision
Plan, the said plan shall, upon approval by the Village,
constitute a tree removal permit.
Section 15.902. Protection of Existing Trees. The following
materials are required for all development
activity requiring Site Plan Review.
A. A tree survey indicating the location, size, and specie of all
trees located on the parcel with a caliper of four (4) inches
or greater.
B. Every reasonable effort shall be made to retain existing trees
on the aforementioned tree survey through the integration of
those trees surveyed into the site and landscaping plans for
a proposed development.
C. A tree preservation plan indicating, at a minimum, the
location of those trees to be preserved and the methods which
are to be used to preserve such trees. This tree preservation
plan shall specify the following:
1. The following preservation techniques shall be employed:
a. All grading and construction equipment shall be
forbidden from encroaching within the drip line of
a tree.
b. Crushed limestone hydrocarbons and other materials
detrimental to trees shall not be dumped within the
drip line of any tree nor at any higher location
where drainage toward the tree could conceivably
effect the health of the tree.
C. Snow fencing shall be temporarily installed at the
periphery of the tree's drip line.
d. No grade changes shall be allowed under drip line
of any trees located on the tree survey.
2. The methods which are to be used to preserve those trees
shall be clearly specified. If, in the opinion of the
Village of Mount Prospect, the necessary precautions as
Chapter 15
Page 23 of 24
specified in the tree preservation plan were not
undertaken before or maintained during construction, the
land development permit for the parcel shall not be
issued or, if previously issued, shall be revoked until
such time as these precautions have been complied with.
D. In the event that a tree designated for preservation is
destroyed or razed during the construction process, such trees
shall be replaced with new trees in accordance with the
following:
Im
F.
Caliber (in inches) Number of Replacement Trees
30 or greater 6
13-29 5
4-12 4
For the above, in the event of fraction of an inch, if a
fraction is less than one-half (1/2) inch, the lower full
number above shall be used. If a fraction is one-half (1/2)
inch or greater, the higher number shall be used.
All replacement trees shall have a minimum caliper of four (4)
inches.
Replacement trees shall be limited to the following species:
1. Linden.
2. Maple (excluding Silver Maple and other similar softwood
species).
3. Hackberry.
4. Ginkgo.
5. Oak.
6. Ash.
7. Thornless Honeylocust (cultivars).
8. Tulip Tree
9. Horse -Chestnut
10. American Beech
11. Purple Leaf -Beech
12. European Beech
13. Maidenhair Tree
14. Moraine Honey -Locust
15. Christine Buisman Elm
G. Removal of trees designated for preservation shall be allowed
only by amending the Landscape Plan. The amended landscape
plan shall indicate the location, specie, and size of all
replacement trees. 11
Chapter 15
Page 24 of 24
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-31-V-90, NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH
LOCATION: 1400 KENSINGTON ROAD
DATE: JUNE 13, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration, their recommendation on
an application for zoning variations filed by the Northwest Assembly of God Church. The
application was originally filed for (8) eight variations. A number of variations were
eliminated due to later revisions of the site plan. The two variations reviewed by the
Zoning Board were as follows:
1. A variation of the parking requirement of 543 spaces to allow 512 parking spaces.
This is a variation of 31 parking spaces.
2. A variation of the 35% lot coverage in an R -X Residential District to permit a
61% lot coverage.
The Zoning Board considered -the request at their meeting of April 26 and May 10. At the
hearings, Attorney Greg Gann and expert witnesses presented evidence and testimony in
support of the request. The attorney and experts explained that the proposed parking was
sufficient for the Church, and that there would be no parking problem at peak times.
Concerning the lot coverage variation, the attorney and experts demonstrated that this lot
coverage for the church was typical of other churches in the Village, so the request was
consistent with existing conditions. Also, the site will have complete stormwater
management, so the higher lot coverage would not cause any flooding on adjoining
properties. Additional details on the variations and testimony are found in the attached
minutes.
Approximately 10 residents spoke in opposition to the request. Residents were concerned
about the large capacity of the church, and the fact that the large parking lot would adjoin
single family homes on the west and north. Residents also believed the church would
create traffic problems on Kensington Road, and effect property values.
The Zoning Board of Appeals voted 2-5 to deny the request. The majority voted against
the variations, believing that not all the required standards for variations had been
addressed. Members were opposed to the higher lot coverage, and stated that an adequate
hardship had not been proven.
Accordingly, the Zoning Board recommends that the request be denied.
DMC:hg
}.tDRTH (cST •��rr+.n[�.Y OG GOC
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA-CASE NO. 31-V-90 Hearing Date: May 10, 1990
PETITIONER: Northwest Assembly of God
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1400 Kensington Rd.
PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 1990
REQUEST: Variations from: Section
14-1002.E to allow lot
coverage of 75% instead of
35%. Section 14.1004.A to
allow a 40' building height
instead of 281. Section
14.3012.A to allow 724
parking spaces instead of 755
required by Code. Section
14-3017 to allow 8.51 wide
parking stall size instead of
9'. Section 14.1004.D to
waive the requirement of
additional setbacks as a
result of the 401 building
height.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Ronald Cassidy
Lois Brothers
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
ABSENT: None
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience
Chairman Basnik introduced this case stating this is a
continuation from the April 26, 1990 Zoning Board meeting at
the petitioners request. He then asked the petitioner to
proceed with their request.
Gregory Gann, the attorney for Northwest Assembly of God,
thanked the Board for having this meeting at his request and
noted that the Church has made additional modifications but
they are requesting a variation for 31 parking spaces.
Mr. Gann also asked that all of the exhibits be entered as
evidence. He then continued stating that the Church had met
with the neighbors the prior Monday and Wednesday night and
listened to the concerns of the neighbors and have made
ZBA-31-V-90
May 10, 1990
Page 2 of 6
significant reductions to the proposal on the parking and lot
coverage. Mr. Gann then compared the Northwest Assembly of
God to other churches stating that they have as much right as
any other church to worship where and how they like. Mr.
Gann then commented that the church is not taxed but the
people that attend the church are just like anyone else and
felt the comment regarding the Church not being taxed
was very unfair. He asked that the comment be stricken from
the record. Mr. .Gann then stated the modifications to the
proposal has been greatly reduced bringing the lot coverage
to 61% from 75% and the parking spaces from 724 to 512 which
is a 30% decrease. He then stated that the Church is in
conformity with other churches in Mount Prospect as far as
the lot coverage. He stated that sanctuary size has been
reduced from 2000 as originally proposed then to 1650 and now
it will be 1400.He also stated that the elimination of
parking on the East perimeter puts them in the retention
requirements providing -more than required by law. The site
plan basically stays the same for the building. Mr. Cassidy
asked if someone from the church could calculate the
'impervious surface and ground coverage for the existing
building at the site. Mr. Gann complimented David Clements
and Paul Bednar for their excellent suggestions and also the
Village staff on their help.
Mr. Gann then introduced Steven Olsen, architect for the
petitioner. Mr. Olsen stated that the modification to the
proposed site would eliminate 1 driveway and 2 rows of
parking on the East edge of the property and would relocate
the handicapped parking spaces to the West of the property.
He also stated that there would be more landscaping and the
island would be enlarged.
Mr. Gann then introduced Dave Swanson, an expert witness for
the church. Mr. Swanson is a Vice -President of a construction
company and an Engineer. He is not a member of the Church.
Mr. Swanson stated that Mr. Gann had asked him to a do some
consulting for him on the churches in Mount Prospect. Mr.
Swanson, then compared the impervious surface and the size of
the lot and building of the churches in Mount Prospect to the
proposed church for Northwest Assembly of God. Mr. Swanson
then proceeded by giving the Board the calculations for:
1. St. Raymond's School and Church -88% impervious
surface. This property has 90,000 square feet.
2. Cumberland Baptist Church -74% impervious surface.
this property has 39,000 square feet.
*qojnqo POO JO STqmassV 4BOmq4JON
aq4 JOJ JOOUTRUO 3q4 'Jq9mOPuvq eAva peonpoaquT ueq4 uuwo •jW
-Pug jaq4o oq4
4`9 XuT4TxD Pug PuO OuO 4s ul TTnd oq 9U0AJOAa $UTmOTTv 9.401
VUTNJVa onbTun v eAvq 6eq4 4*9q4 pa4u9mm oo inq seowds NuTXjvd
jo Jqqznu oq4 4unoo lou PTP OR paqu4s uosusmS -jw -seq
s,puomAwH *4S seouds XuiNjvd Auum moq paNav 4TUSVH UWWJTVqo
*Aqjadoad STq4
JOJ UOATX OXWjOOJ eivnbe ou sum ajeql *soovds NUTNjud
09 svq Pug 9Tdood oge s4was qojnqo STq4 4s Ajvn'4'Ouvs
aq4 4vql Po4ou uosuvms *aw *01siOA00 40T Pug
eoujins snOTAJadMT %6C-qojnqo uvTja4AqAsajd AlTunumoo -CI
. A.
4iodoid BM JOJ uDATX 9Vv400j ejenbs
ou sum ajoqj *o4unbapouT ST A4TTTOv3 SM JOJ XuTNjvd
aq4 4TO3 OR 49q4 P94ou uosuvms oJW *OXvJOAOO,ZOT
Pug eoujans snOTAjadMT %19-qoanqo 4uvuaAoo loomq4joN •ZT
-i4jadoid siq4 joj UaATI aXVqOOJ
eavnbs ou sum ajaql •qojnqo STqq JOJ Vui4avd qaejqs
JJO OU ST aJ9q4 qgqq pa4oU UOSUvmS
'JW '919JOA00 40T
Pug eovjjna snoTAjodmT %Lt-qojnqO TudoosTda uqor -4S -IT
-A4jedoid
BTRI joi uOATS aVeqooj ejunbs ou sum aj&Ml *a$vjaAoo.
IOT Pug 80vjjns snoTAjadwi %Lg-qojnqo S,VTTTOOD '4S '01
. Aliedoid
Stqj JOJ UOATX OR9400J ajunbs ou sum ejoqj -aoujjns
anOTAiedut %69 -qojnqo 4STPOq4OW
paqTun A4TUTJI -6
-A4jedoid siq,4
Joi uaATR eVwqooj ajunbs ou Sum DJ9ql *aBVJ9AOO IOT
Pug aoujins snoiAiadMT %09-qojnqo 44oXoag sumoql -4S -9
-A4jadoid
STq4 JOJ U8ATX aXVjOOJ ejunbs ou sum ajaql -eovjaAoo
40T Pug 009jins snOTAjad=T %19-qojnqo pamjojoa ooved 'L
-A4jadoid sTq4 joj
UlOATX aRV40o3 ejunbs ou sum ajoRl '98VJ9AOO 40T Pug
eovjjns snOTAjadwT %Z9 -qojnqo Pug TOOqOS 8,ATTmH '4S '9
-A4jadoid jo s000td q4oq sapnTOUT uOT4vTnOT90 aq4 Pug
JOq4O qOvq,Mojj 4aOj4s qqq 880JOU Pq4tOOT ST A4jadoid
SM 4vq4 P84ou uOsuvmS -aw -aoujins snoiAi - adMT Pug
aluJaAOO IOT %tg-qojnqo Pug TOOqOS uvJalq'4nri View 14S *9
-Aqaadoid HTq4 UO UaATV aRV400J ejunbs ou sum aaaql
.a8v.18n00 40T %69 -qojnqo OTqTfl 4oadsoad 4unoW *t
-qojnqo Pug TOOROB
aq4 q4oq q4Tm %19 ST a8V400J ejunbs aql -A4jadoid
aq4 UO NUT48TXQ ST 4VqM Pug XUT149JP posodoad,aqq moij
SUOT4vTn0Tv0 81q PeATOOaJ OR Pug UOT4oni4suoo japun
BT TOOROB aq4 48q3 PO4ou uosuvmS -jW -%Tg si A4jadoid
aq4 jo 4jvd q4joN aq4 Pug %OL gag 40T NUTNied
Pug qojnqo aq4-q0anRD Pug TOOqOS uvjaq4nq Tnud -4S *C
9 jo c alud
066T 'OT AwN
06-A-TE-VBZ
ZBA-31-V-90
May 10, 1990
Page 4 of 6
Mr. Landowehr stated that the requirements for the retention
for the new proposal has exceeded the requirements for the
Village and the Metropolitian Sanitary District. Storage for
the property will be in the Northeast corner of the property
by the dry basin.
Mr. Gann then introduced Victor Ley, Metro Transportation.
Mr. Ley stated that with the revisions to the site plan the
amount of time to exit the parking lot after a service would
be 25 minutes. Mr. Gann then reminded the Board of the size
of the driveways for ingress on egress with each drive being
three lines. Mr. Ley then stated the level of service for the
parking lot would be level C on the eastern drive and the
western drive would be a level B. Mr. Ley also stated that
the level of service would remain the same at level A.
Mr. Ley stated that no research was done on the side streets
Newberry and Westgate, but by his opinion would not be
affected by the proposed church. Mr. Gann then asked Mr. Lay
if' the level of service on Kensington would be affected by
the ingress to the Church parking lot. Mr. Ley stated it
would not affect Kensington Road.
Mr. Gann then reviewed the requirements for a variation.
He feels that the church has met all the requirements for
variations to be granted. Mr. Gann then stated that the
church is in no way a threat to the community and will not
bring down the characteristics to the neighborhood. He also
stated that this is a permitted use in a single family zoned
area.
David Clements, Director of Planning and Zoning, stated that
this property is zoned R -X and this allows up to 35% lot
-coverage and the church's proposal is reasonable with the 61%
lot coverage which falls between 35 and 75%, found in
commercial areas.
Ron Alfirevic, 805 Newberry Ln., presented the Board members
with a copy of the comments by the neighborhood. Mr.
Alfirevic stated that the proposal for the Church is still a
bit to ambitious. He also feels that the traffic studies are
invalid considering Kensington and Wolf Rds. are under
construction and most people are avoiding the area. Mr.
Alfirevic also stated that he had counted the cars on two
occasions in the Church's temporary location at River Trails
Junior High, one service had 250 cars the other had 230 cars.
On each occasion it took the cars to exit was about 30
minutes. He also stated that,the homeowners property values
will decrease with the new development. Mr. Alfirevic also
stated that the burden of sacrifice seems to be on the
residents.
PTnom pus ajaq4 aq o4 4q8Tj v svq qojnqo 9M4 4T93 SRW,O *EJN
•Tv'IU9PTB9J uT qojnqo v BuTMOTTV JO 80ugulPio aq4 BUTRuvqo
UO pauoi4senb NTusua UWMJTUqO 'UOT4vTJuA v JOJ
swamajinbaj
oq4 rano luxoR Aq asuo aq4 PQmqTAaj Uaqq pigo
El 9qj,
*43 *bs 000,081 aq PTnom BMTV'4aPTB Pug BaTSTV 9qq 'BIT948
XuT4jvd 8UTpnT0uT Sliadoad aq4 uo aXv4o0'
j ajunbs T9404
aq4 lvql P84v4s uQq4 uuvD 'JW *%91 BT TOOqOS OITTAuwqaaa
49 a8vJaAO0 40T VuT48Tx8 aq4 4vq4 pa4v4s aqemopuvq -jW
-qojnqo aq4 joj j944aq aq PTnom JTOM
Pug uO4$uTsuaX IN 6ITs aq4 sTa83 lAajaqmaN 908 fuum4jv qjaqo8
-dzqspjwq Auv
UOAOjd IOU svq qojnqo aq4 BTT93 'POOmuOJI 609T 'RuTlqaW wil
*Ipa4oe33w aq qonw AJOA PTnOm
OnTVA Aqjadoid eqj ST983 Pug 048489 T998 JOUJUM Pug Pilva
JOj sxjOM eqs 4vq4 Paqv4s l8joMvoAS CITT IAOTMOtd UUv AJUR
,uaaq svq ATTIRDJ,XUTqIOU PUN sjoqqXTOU 8q4 q4TM POATOsa-1 BT
8UTqj6J8A9 SXUTq4 UUVo *JW 49q4 ST9Q3 OsTv QH -anTuA A4jadoid
aq4 q4Tm P9uJ90U00 sT OsTv 'Ajjaqmak IT8 lanbui0l4u8A U14JUW
-anTVA 64jedoid 9ql q4Tm PaUJ80UOo OSTV sT qgva 'JW -VuTPTTnq
JO 8ZTS 9q4 PUS aaMaS WJ04S 'XUT4q2TT aq4 ss jvj Su 8uTq4AUV
PQ8UWq0 IOU 9AVq SUOTSTA8J aq4 T993 'AjjaqmaN Z08 lqwsa UOQ
, qjqqq
TTT'4s ST WQTqojd 8q4 Pus lUTPTTnq aq4 jo azTs aq4 peonpaj
4ou svq qojnqo aq4 ET993 'POOmuOJI 909T lonquuoa 9TUJaH
•pooqjoqqVTau 8qq UT 0T33WJ4
aq4 jo jovdMT 8q4 UO PaUJ90UO0 ST pus pooqjoqqXTQu aq4
uT EXTUmOPTS Ou ST 9Jaq4 lvq4 PO4ou AjjaqmaN ZOOT '80quq uQX
*PUTX 8MOS JO U92JO Us UT qnd oI apToop aq4 jT 4nq sjuo moij
ATUO IOU qojnqo aq4 moij OSTOU aq4 Pus XUTPT
Tnq aqq jo 4q8Taq
8q4 POUOT49enb OsTv 8H *pooqjoqqXTau aqq uT 6mOOTOm IOU El
IT u9q4 IOU JT pus A4jadoad aq4 94T3 qojnqo aq4 JT p9UOT4sanb
OsTv NezPvH -jw -dn XUTMOaV 9"m AOR4 U8qm UaJPTTMO STq JOJ
pooB aq PTnom IT 4TO3 aH lejaqj 4q8Tj Xutaq Aqjadoid 4oT*J'4STP
Njud aq4 jo aanvoeq sum ajaq4 IqXnoq* s4uapTsai jaq4o aq,4
JO 480m ATqwqojd pus aq uosvej UTvw aq4 Pus vais padOT9Aap
9 ST STq4 qgqq pq4U6WMoo S
POOMUOJI IT91 6M8ZP8U NOTa
9 JO 9 exud
0661 '01 ANN
06-A-TE-VSZ
ZBA-31-V-90
May 10, 1990
Page 6 of 6
not object. Mr. Brettrager asked that a recommendation
to the Village Board be made on landscaping. Chairman Basnik
still questioned the size of the building. Mr. Petrucelli
feels that no hardship has been proven. Mr. Lannon questioned
if this a convenience for only having one service.
Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioners
a Special Use with the variations from: Section 14.1002.E to
allow a lot coverage of now 61% instead of 35%. Section
14.1004.A to allow a 40" building height instead of 28'.
Section 14.3012.A to allow 612 parking spaces instead of 755
required by Code. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide
parking stall size instead of 91. Section 14.1004.D to waive
the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of the 401
building height. Chairman Basnik asked if anyone objected
that they vote one time on all variations. No one objected.
Mr. Lannon moved, Mrs. O'may seconded.
Upon Roll Call• AYES: Brettrager, O'May
NAYS: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy,
Basnik
Motion denied by a vote of 2-5.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board
for their consideration.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
GIL BASNIK, CHAIRMAN . 1 FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: MAY 4, 1990
SUBJECT: NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH
On Friday, May 4, 1 met with Attorney Greg Gann of Northwest Assembly of God Church.
We discussed the Church's variation application, and the public hearing that was continued
to May 10.
Mr. Gann has advised me of the following:
1. At this time, the church is proposing to reduce seating in the main sanctuary to
1400. This is accomplished by deleting the balcony seating.
2. With this change, total parking has been reduced from 616 to 512, a reduction
of 104 spaces. The 512 spaces represent 467 spaces for the sanctuary, and 45
spaces for the existing building. Please note that 76 spaces are required for the
main building, which is used for office, classrooms and meeting space. Mr. Gann
is requesting that the parking variation of 31 spaces be reconsidered for the
existing building.
3. Total lot coverage is proposed for 59% to 60%, a reduction from the 66%
discussed at the last meeting. As you know, 35% is the maximum lot coverage
in the R -X District.
Mr. Gann also stated that one result of this revision is that when church membership nears
a point where there is a need for the balcony seating, the church would file for whatever
lot coverage or parking variations would be necessary, to accommodate the increased
seating. In this way, the church has an opportunity to prove itself a good neighbor before
maximum use of the site is allowed.
Two additional staff comments are as follows:
Concerning traffic generation, staff notes that times of peak use of the church
facilities will be Sundays and Wednesdays. This peak time will not coincide with
rush hour traffic on Kensington, particularly when traffic is leaving the church
late Wednesday evenings or Sundays at noon or 1:00 p.m.
Mount Prospect Zoning Board of Appeals
May 4, 1990
Page 2
2. The lot coverage requirement in single family districts is intended to regulate
development in areas where there is no stormwater detention. The ordinance
is stating that you must have more open space than lot coverage, to prevent
over -building and help control run-off.
Northwest Assembly of God provides on-site detention to control stormwater.
In other zoning districts where detention is required for development, lot
coverage is allowed from 75% to 80%.
The church provides 59% to 60% lot coverage, a good compromise between the
strict residential zoning requirement of 35%, and the 75% to 80% standard in
areas where stormwater detention is required.
Lastly, the staff supports the request, and believes the approach by the church in revising
the plan is as sensitive as they can be to adjoining property owners, while stall allowing for
reasonable growth of their congregation.
DMC:hg
cc: John Fulton Dixon
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA-31-V-90 Hearing Date: April 26, 1990
PETITIONER: Northwest Assembly of God
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1400 Kensington Road
''PUBLICATION DATE: April 10, 1990
REQUEST: Variations from: Section
14-1002.A to allow a zero foot
front yard for parking instead
of 40'. Section 14.1002.B to
allow a 5' side yard instead of
10'. Section 14.1002.0 to allow
a rear yard of 10' instead of
251. Section 14.1002.E to allow
lot coverage of 75% instead of
35%. Section 14.1004.A to allow
a 40.1 building height of 281.
Section 14.3012.A to allow 724
parking spaces instead of 755
required by Code. Section
14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide
parking stall size instead of
91. Section 14.1004.D to waive
the requirement of additional
setbacks as a result of the 401
building height.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
ABSENT: Lois Brothers
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Full Audience
Chairman Basnik introduced the case stating the following
variations are requested by the petitioner:
1. Section 14.1002.A to allow a zero foot front yard
for parking instead of 40'.
2. Section 14.1002.8 to allow a 5' side yard instead of
101.
3. Section 14.1002.8 to allow a rear yard of 10' instead
of 251.
4. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75%
instead of 35%.
5. Section 14.004.A to allow a 40' building height.
ZBA-31-V-90
April 26, 1990
Page 2 of 6
6. Section 14.3012.A to allow 724 parking spaces instead
of 755 required by Code.
7. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide parking stall
size instead of 9'.
8. Section 14.1004.D to waive the requirement of
additional setbacks as a result of the 40' building
height.
Gregory Gann, representing the petitioner, Northwest Assembly
of God, opened thanking the Board and noting that on Monday,
April 23, 1990, that Church representatives had met with the
neighbors of the community at the Northwest Ministry Center
also known as the former Feehanville School, to resolve some
of their concerns. Mr. Gann also stated that the requests for
variations numbers two and six are no longer needed. The lot
coverage has been brought down to 67%-68%. Also, the parking
spaces have been brought down to 616 spaces, and the
sanctuary size has been reduced to 1620.
David Landowehr, the project Engineer representing the
Church, stated that the proposed development of the Church
would have no impact on the sewer and water, which would be
within Citizens Utilities District. He also explained the
storm water run-offs and stated the Church would have their
own detention basin for stormwater management.
Steven Olsen, the architect for the Church and also a
parishioner, explained to the Board about the design for the
building and the reasons for the size. Mr. Olsen stated that
the Northwest Ministry building would be the "base" of the
new church, having classrooms which are existing and a large
lobby and the sanctuary which would seat up to 1,620 people.
The building, which will be up to 401 in height and slope
down, allowing future seating if the Church grows in size.
Victor Ley, representing the Church from Metro Transportation
from Bloomingdale, IL. studied the traffic flow on Kensington
and Wolf Roads for a twenty-four hour period and figured in
the traffic from the Church in the hours of 12:00 p.m. to
1:00 p.m. and felt there was no impact on the traffic flow
from his study. Mr. Cassidy questioned him if he included the
side streets such as Westgate Rd. in his study. Mr. Lay
stated Metro had not included the side streets in his study.
Jim Nichols, Pastor for the Northwest Assembly of God,
commented on the Church and their plans for rebuilding.
Mr. Nichols stated that the Church likes to hold one
service and wants the whole congregation to be there at once.
ZBA-31-V-90
April 26, 1990
Page 3 of 6
In his closing statement, Mr. Gann address the variation
standards and stated that the Church has met all the Zoning
requirements and the exhibits that have been presented to the
Board will hopefully clarify their proposal. Mr. Gann also
stated he knows that all the concerns'from the neighbors such
as the car fumes and headlights are still going to be an
issue and they hope to,work it out with the neighbors. He
also stated that churches are allowed in residential areas
and feels that it would be beneficial for the community. Mr.
Gann thanked the -Board and stated that the experts with the
Church would be here for follow up questions.
Chairman Basnik complimented Mr. Gann on his presentation
stating that they answered most of the questions before they
were even asked. Chairman Basnik then asked Paul Bednar from
the Village to make his comments.
Paul Bednar, Planner with the Village of Mount Prospect,
stated that the proposal which is on a 9 -acre parcel is zoned
for single-family which allows a Church and/or school.
He also stated that the Village also had concerns with the
perimeter setbacks to the single-family homes to the north
and to the west and the lot coverage. He noted that the
Church is required to put in a 251 setback and the landscape
buffers should hopefully block the parking lot from the
neighbors. The parking lot and other basins would be
sufficient for the stormwater flow. He also stated that the
lot coverage has been brought down to 6 ' 7% . The remaining
variations on the building height and parking stalls are also
reasonable requests considering the height would only be at
one point of the building and sloping down and the parking
stall widths would be okay considering that the majority of
people would be staying for a period of time as to a
commercial establishment. In closing, Paul felt that the
Church has addressed the staff concerns.
Ron Alfirevic, 805 Newberry, spokesman for the neighbors,
stated that the major concern is the number of parking spaces
and the traffic that will take place with this large of a
facility. Mr. Alfirevic stated that at an estimate time of
616 cars to leave the parking lot with only two exits at an
average of six seconds would take 62 minutes; Mr. Alfirevic
feels that with all these cars trying to leave the parking
lot at "one time" would create a lot of "gunk" from the fumes
and then causing traffic problems on Kensington Road.
ZBA-31-V-90
April 26,1990
Page 4 of 6
Dick Radzak, 1611 Ironwood, stated his major concern is the
large parking lot and noted that this is most of the
neighbors concerns. Mr. Radzak also feels that the study on
the traffic flow is inaccurate because Wolf and Kensington
Roads are under construction and this would drastically
change when the construction is complete allowing more
traffic on these roads. Mr. Radzak also feels that people
attending the services will start using the side streets and
affecting their neighborhood as far as the safety issue.
Tim Metling, of 1609 Ironwood, stated that he and a
neighbor took a ride through the Opus Business Center and
noted the height on the parking lot lights is 181 to 201
which is reasonable and that the churches request for 2'61
would cast a decent shadow on the surrounding homes.
Mr. Metling also stated that a another neighbor asked a
realtor what the affect on their homes would be with a
facility this size. The realtor sent back a letter stating
that it would decrease their home values by 10%-20% which in
Mr. Metling's view would decrease their homes by $20,000.60.
Mr. Metling also stated that they asked the Church how many
Mount Prospect residents attend their church and the church
said in a 5 mile radius was 50% of their congregation.
Jordan Saletko, 803 Newberry, stated he had two issues to
address. The first concern is the Human Services for the
neighborhood. Mr. Saletko stated that if someone in the
neighborhood needed to get to the hospital or if an ambulance
or the police department had to get into the neighborhood
they would have a difficult time with all the traffic that
the church would create on Kensington Roads. Mr. Saletko's
other issue is how the Church feels they have been good
neighbors. Mr. Saletko stated that on numerous occasions
he has had to pick up garbage that has been tossed over his
fence from the Church and presented the Board with a frisbee
that had "Northwest Assembly of God" on it.
Donald Raab, 802 Newberry, stated that he has been a resident
of the Northeast corner of Kensington and Wolf Roads since
1971. He noted that the Northwest Assembly of God has only
600 parishioners and feels that the church is proposing is a
gross overuse of this property. Mr. Raab also stated that
Saint Emily's Church on Central Road has over 3000
parishioners and they have no problem to accommodate them.
He also stated that,the Church has over the past 17 years had
ark up and down history in the number of parishioners from 100
to 1200 back down to 600.
ZBA-31-V-90
April 26,1990
Page 5 of 6
Peter Hanchar, 1311 Ironwood, stated he has'a few concerns
with the new Church. His first concern is will this new
building be fire protected because the prev I ious building was
not.
Gerald Sharlog, 1400 E. Ironwood, stated his main concern
is the parking lot and the lot coverage and used Willow Creek
as an example that as it grew they asked for more property
and will the Northwest Assembly of God ask for more if they
do indeed increase in size.
Martin Venticinique, 811 Newberry, stated a concern to the
Board and to the experts the church had brought with them.
He questioned where will all the snow go with the amount of
with the amount of impervious surface.
Mr. Raab also questioned what will be done with the property
on the corner of Kensington and Wolf. They were told it would
be a gymnasium of some sort.
Bob Fitzgerald, 1319 Mulberry, commented that the
neighborhood already has no sidewalks forcing the residents
and their children to use the streets and the impact on the
neighborhood of the cars from the church will become a safety
issue.
Mr. Gann, attorney for the Church , addressed the questions
for the concerned the neighbors. Mr. Gann stated that he has
been the attorney for the Northwest Assembly of God for the
last 12 years but is not a parishioner. The other experts are
not parishioners of the church except for Steven Olsen the
architect. He also stated that a large percentage of the
parishioners are from Mount Prospect. As for the fire
protection issue, Mr. Gann stated that the new buildings will
be sprinklered. Mr. Ley addressed the traffic concerns. He
told the Board the peak hours of his study and that this was
done during the churches service hours. Chairman Basnik asked
Mr. Ley to address the question of the amount of time it
would be to exit the parking lot of 616 cars. Mr. Ley could
not answer the'question. Mr. Landowher addressed the utility
and water issues. He stated that the impact qn'the
neighborhood would be minimal. Chairman Basnik addressed the
pastor if the church feels it will grow. Mr. Nichols hopes
that the church will grow and that this new facility will
accommodate them. Mr. Brettrager questioned the pastor on the
number of services, and the pastor stated again that the
church likes to meet as one congregation. Mr. Gann addressed
the snow removal question by the neighbors. He stated that
the church would not use the 25' perimeter as a place to put
the snow, but would simply
ZBA-31-V-90
April 26, 1990
Page 6 of 6
put it in the parking lot and lose parking spaces as every
other parking lot in the Village does in that period of time.
Mr. Gann also stated that they will prevent people from using
the side streets to park on and if need be they will have the
Village patrol.
Chairman Basnik asked the board to address the subject and
closed off the public discussion. Mr. Lannon asked Steven
Olsen what would be done with the building on Kensington and
Wolf Rds. Mr. Olsen stated the building would be used as a
gymnasium type of building with a few classrooms and a lobby.
It would also remain the same height as the existing
building. He also questioned the stormwater flow. If it was
based on the 100 year flood. Mr. Landowehr stated it was
based on the 100 year flood and if water was to exceed this
amount it would flow southeast or into the basins. Mr.
Lannon then asked Mr. Nichols why the church only had one
service. Again Mr. Nichols stated that the church acts as
one congregation. Mr. Petrucelli stated that he saw a problem
with this because schools and churches were compatible with
the single-family for offering services to the community, and
this large project seems to be acting as more of a commercial
enterprise than as a service to the community. Mrs. O'May
disagreed with Mr. Petrucelli on the commercial use of the
church stating that there are other churches in the Village
and they're all in the same situation. Mr. Cassidy feels this
church is to large for this parcel, stating that what that
the church wants should not be zoned R -X. Mr.Brettrager
disagreed with Mr.Cassidy stating that St.Raymond's in Mount
Prospect has used all their impervious surface. Chairman
Basnikstatedhe is still concerned on the growth of the
Church and what would happen if they didn't increase in size,
what would the neighborhood and the Village end up with. He
also stated the concern of the parking lot, he is still
questioning the amount of time it would take to empty it out.
Mr. Lannon stated that this is a high intensity use for this
parcel of land. He also stated that this is a lot of coverage
for this property, and he would not support the proposal
unless they brought in a better landscaping plan. Mr. Gann
asked the Board'if the Church could return the following
Thursday to address the comments made by the Village. Mr.
Brettrager asked that the reasons should be brought out know
so the Church knows what to address. The two Main concerns of
the Zoning Board are the lot coverage and the size of the
church. Chairman Basnik adjourned the meeting stating that
the case would be continued to the following Thursday unless
heard otherwise. This case must still be heard before the
Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
`,�LLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL.-T
MANMG AM ZOMING DUAOMPa
Mount Pros t„ Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS A CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER—<a'-6—�
SUBJECT. ZBA-31-V-90, NORTHWEST ASSEMBLY OF GOD CHURCH
LOCATION: 1400 KENSINGTON ROAD
DATE: APRIL 19,19"
REQUE
The applicants are requesting the following variations:
1. Section 14.1002A to allow a zero foot front yard for parking instead of 40 feet.
2. Section 14.1002.13 to allow a 5' side yard instead of Vy.
3. Section 14.1002.0 to allow a rear yard of 10' instead of 25'.
4. Section 14.1002.E to allow lot coverage of 75% instead of 35%.
5. Section 14.1004A to allow a 40' building height instead of 28'.
6. Section 14.3012.A to allow 724 parking spaces instead of 755 required by Code.
7. Section 14.3017 to allow an 8.5' wide parking stall size instead of 9'.
8. Section 14.1004.13 to waive the requirement of additional setbacks as a result of
the 40' building height.
The following comments were submitted by various staff departments.
1. Kensington Road is a State road. An I.D.O.T. permit will be required for all
access to Kensington Road. Right and left turn exit lanes should be provided at all
exits from the church property. The State will determine whether turning lanes
should be provided on Kensington Road itself. Church officials should contact
I.D.O.T. regarding this matter. Also, it must be verified as to whether Kensington
Road rigbt-of-way is fully dedicated.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-31-V-90
April 19, 1990
2. There are easements shown on the plat of survey. Is there anything actually
located within these easements?
3. An M.S.D. permit will be required. The Village has no sanitary sewer at this
location. Citizens utilities may not allow the church to use their sanitary service
without using their water also. The Village has an 8" watermain on the south side
of Kensington Road. There is also a large North West Water Commission
watermain on the south side of Kensington Road which must be avoided.
4. All Development Code requirements must be met, including but not limited to,
street lights sidewalks and 11 parkway trees. New curbs will also be required along
the parking lot perimeter. Storm sewer connections are both Village and State
jurisdiction. An I.D.O.T. permit will be required to connect into the State sewer.
5. The present surface drainage flow is from the west, north and east onto this
property. Drainage must not be blocked from any direction as a result of new
construction. On-site detention will be required
6. The Fire Prevention Bureau will determine location of all hydrants. Fire lanes
must meet the fire codes.
7. Crime Prevention Office should be involved in reviewing the church security.
8. No construction equipment or grading changes will be allowed near the root
zones of existing parkway trees.
9. A general concern was noted regarding the traffic flow in and out of this property
as a result of the large expansion.
10. A resubdivision, consolidating all lots into one, is required.
_ AND ZONING COMMENIES
The Northwest Assembly of God Church owns the nine acre parcel which once was the
home of the Feehanville School. The former 20,000 square foot school building had been
converted to office and classrooms for the church years ago. The church is now proposing
a 37,650 square foot building expansion on the property in order to accommodate a church
auditorium with seating capacityof 2,000 people. The remaining 44,000 square feet will
be office and classroom space. In an attempt to accommodate this size of expansion along
with the required parking, a number of variations are requested.
This property, along with adjacent park land to the east is zoned R -X, large lot single
family. The present zoning allows a church as a permitted use. To the west and north is
a single family subdivision zoned R-1. On the south side of Kensington Road is the
Kensington Business Park zoned I-1. The River Trails Junior High School and park land
abut this property on the eastern edge. The Northwest Assembly of God also owns the
Gil Basnik - Page 3
ZBA-31-V-90
April 19, 1990
corner lot property on Wolf and Kensington which, up until last year's fire, was the home
of the church sanctuary. The Comprehensive Plan, updated as recently as December of
19138, divides this parcel for two uses; the west being Institutional and the eastern half being
Community/Regional Open Space. A change to the Comprehensive Plan will be required.
A large portion of this property is presently vacant and this is especially important
considering the large percentage of vacant land abutting the single family homes. "There
is only one area along the west prop" line where there is an existing 5 foot parking lot
setback, For this reason, we question why the new parking lot cannot meet the setback
requirements of 10 feet on the west and 25 feet on the north. Understandably, the total
number of parking spaces will be decreased along with a probably decrease in the building
size as a result. But it appears to be a feasible option. The petitioner should address this
comment.
Each specific variation is addressed below:
1. A Z&ro foot
leave the e)dsting =king intact at sQuthwest
comer. It would be possible to remove a portion of this asphalt area in order to
meet Code. Approximately 8 parking spaces would be lost as a result. An increase
in the parking lot setback will benefit the on-site traffic flow and safety. The
remainder of the front yard setback meets Code.
lF Z I KDAMM
3. A 10 foot rSar ygrd ' - I ' ' instead of 25 fcc - By increasing this setback
to 20 feet, a number of parking spaces would be deleted, subject to a redesign. The
resultant 20 foot landscape buffer would be desired in order to provide a good
landscape treatment, however, it is possible to do a fair to adequate buffer within
a 10 foot strip.
4. 75% lot covemee rath r an 35% - For an institutional property, such as a
church, 35% total lot coverage is somewhat unrealistically low. This standard is
primarily for single family areas where there is no detention. A single family house,
could meet this coverage, requirement with ease. Commercial or industrial buildings
would be allowed 75% lot coverage, by Code. Since this church building, located
on a large single family lot is a hybrid, it seems reasonable that the allowable lot
,coverage be more than 35% but less than 75%. By providing increased perimeter
yard setbacks, as recommended above, the lot coverage would be decreased.
GO Basnik - Page 4
ZBA-31-V-90
April: 19, 1990
5. A 40 foot buildirig heiebt in Itad of 28 feet to accommodate a d= on the
auditgriuM - Building elevation drawings will help to visualize this height. The fact
that the building dome is to be located at the center of this 9 acre parcel, should
help minimize any visual impact it will have on the neighborhood.
6. 724 SjUldng Spaces jMtead of 755 - We concur with the findings of the
petitioner's traffic consultant, that the parking spaces provided will be adequate even
on the busiest day.
7. Allom an 8.5 fQQt yddr, pirking stall instead of 9 et -'Tbe Zoning Code allows
the Director of Planning and Zoning discretion to permit smaller stall widths for
long-term parking in industrial or office settings. An institutional use, such as this
church, is also an appropriate long-term parking provider and could be permitted
an 8.5 foot stall width.
is a service or activity.
to & # A . # 0
[.101#10 okpjtw)
In summary, additional parking lot setbacks can be accommodated which will benefit the
single family neighbors and decrease the lot coverage. The result may be the reduction of
a very small number of seats in the auditorium. The petitioner must adequately address
this possibility.
PB:hg
ViLI AGE OF MOUNT PROSP f
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
DATE: JUNE 12, 1990
SUBJECT: 1988 FAIR HOUSING ACT
GROUP HOMES FOR THE DEVELOPMENTALLY DISABLED
In 1988, amendments to the Fair Housing Act were adopted that provided equal opportunity
and fair housing to persons with developmental or mental disabilities. The purpose of the
disability -related provisions of the Act is to "permit persons with disabilities to live where
they wish, irrespective of the views, prejudices and desires of neighbors, governments or the
real estate industry." In September of 1989, the State of Illinois adopted similar
requirements, known as the Community Residence Location Planning Act.
The Illinois law requires home -rule municipalities to amend their Zoning Ordinances to
assure the adequate availability of sites for group homes in single family neighborhoods.
As a general statement, group homes should be treated no differently than traditional family
living arrangements. The Illinois law further requires that by July 1, 1990, corporate
authorities shall adopt a resolution stating that appropriate amendments to the Zoning
Ordinance will be undertaken and completed by December, 1990. This resolution will
scheduled for review by the Village Board on June 19.
Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance makes the following provisions for group homes:
A.) A family care home of no more than 5 individuals is a permitted use in all residential
zoning districts. This would be in compliance with w w
B.) A group home of 6 to 25 individuals is a Special Use in all residential zoning
districts. This would not be ing=liangg with tbenew laws.
C.) General administrative requirements for residential care homes are found in Section
14.114. These general provisions include a minimum distance between group homes,
concentration requirements in neighborhood areas, parking standards and inspection
requirements. These general requirements will have to be reviewed, and necessary
amendments drafted.
Mount Prospect has been fortunate in that three group homes have operated in the
community. Two are currently operating. I believe these established homes indicate that
the needs of developmentally disabled persons can be easily integrated into the community,
and have no adverse impact. With this knowledge, I believe we can proceed with
confidence in meeting the new state and federal laws.
DMC:hg
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION STATING THE INTENT OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
TO MEET THE FAIR HOUSING ACT OF 1988, AS AMENDED, AND THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY RESIDENCE LOCATION ACT OF 1989
WHEREAS, the Fair Housing Act of 1988, as amended, brings people with
developmental or mental disabilities under the protection of federal fair housing law; and
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois Community Residence Location Planning Act of
1989 was adopted to advance the adoption of legal zoning provisions for group homes by
each of Illinois 110 home rule municipalities; and
WHEREAS, The Community Residence Location Planning Act requires each home
rule municipality to submit a plan by July 1, 1990 stating the measures that the municipality
will take to assure the adequate availability of sites for group homes within the municipality;
and
WHEREAS, The Village of Mount Prospect is a home rule municipality
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The following shall be the plan that the Village of Mount Prospect
intends to implement prior to December 31, 1990, to meet the requirements of the
Community Residence Location Planning Act.
SECTION TWO: The Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance currently has the following
provisions for group homes, generally described:
1. A family care home of no more than five (5) developmentally disabled, handicapped
or senior citizens is a permitted use in all residential zoning districts.
2. A group home of six (6) to twenty-five (25) developmentally disabled, handicapped
or senior citizens is a Special Use in all residential zoning districts.
3. A family is one or more persons related by blood, marriage or adoption, or a group
of not more than five (5) persons not so related, maintaining a common household
in a dwelling unit.
4. General provisions for residential care homes provide inspection requirements,
location and spacing requirements, parking requirements and occupancy standards.
5. More specific restrictions, including definitions, are in the attached Exhibit A.
SECTION THREE: The Village of Mount Prospect intends to comply with the Fair
Housing Act and the Community Residence Location Planning Act by taking adequate
measures to assure the availability of sites for group homes, by the following amendments
to the Zoning Ordinance, generally described:
1. Definition - Group Home - A specialized residential care home serving unrelated
persons with mental, intellectual or physical impairments or disabilities, which is
licensed, certified or accredited by appropriate local or state authorities. A group
home provides a home, family -like living arrangement where residents learn the same
daily living skills taught in a typical family household. Professional services and
supervision are included in a group home.
2. For persons with disabilities, any group home that complies with the current
definition of family, shall be allowed in all residential districts, without any separation
requirement.
3. Any group home that does not meet the current definition of family shall be allowed
in all residential districts provided that the group home is not located within one
thousand feet (1,000') of another group home. The purpose of the separation
requirement is to help integrate group homes into the community, and as a minimum,
provide a one block separation.
4. Establish a Special Use permit procedure for group homes that do not meet the one
thousand foot (1,000') separation requirement described above. The Special Use
application shall be subject to specific standards, including, but not limited to the
following:
a. A certified statement by a specialist in the field of the specific disability of
persons in the proposed group home, indicating that two (2) grouphomes
within the one thousand foot (1,000') separation will not have an adverse
impact on the integration into the community or "normalcy" of persons in the
group home.
5. All appropriate sections of the Mount Prospect Zoning Ordinance shall be amended
to reflect the above standards.
SECTION FOUR.: The Village of Mount Prospect will undertake the amendments
described in Section 2, in the following fashion.
1. Language for the proposed amendments will be drafted by the Department of
Planning and Zoning and the Village Attorney.
2. Public hearings on the proposed amendments will be conducted by the Zoning Board
of Appeals in August or September of 1990, in compliance with all appropriate State
laws.
3. Approval by the Corporate Authorities, and an authorizing ordinance will be adopted
in September or October of 1990.
The final ordinance will be sent to the Illinois Council on Developmental Disabilities
prior to December 30, 1990.
SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED this day of , 1990.
APPROVED this day of , 1990.
ATTEST:
-2-
43
EXHIBIT "A"
Sec. 14.114. Requirements for Residential Care Homes. In order to ensure compatibility
between existing neighborhoods and proposed residential care homes; to safe•
guard the public environment and to provide a home environment, as well as care for the
individual needs of the residents of residential care homes; to prevent overconcentrations
of such facilities; to insure adequate and reasonable control; and to facilitate fair consideration
of permit applications for such uses; the following requirements are set forth for residential
care homes: - .
A. All residential care homes shall be licensed by the State or, if no State licensing
program exists, by the Village. Such license shall be subject to annual inspection
and, if a Village license, annual renewal. No such facility shall be permitted to operate
without proof of license being submitted to the Director of Community Development.
B. All residential care homes shall be subject to annual inspection by the Director of
Community Development, the Code Enforcement Department and the Health
Department, for compliance with all Village ordinances.
C. Residential care facilities shall comply with the following location requirements:
1. The minimum distance between any two (2) group care homes and/or family
care homes shall be one thousand feet (1,000').
2. The minimum distance between any rehabilitation home and any group home
or any other rehabilitation home shall be two thousand feet (2,000').
3. The maximum combined population of all residential care homes shall not exceed
one percent (I 07o) of the total population in the neighborhood statistic area in which
they are located, as defined by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
4. Atter two (2) rehabilitation homes are located within any given neighborhood
statistic area, no other such facilities shall locate in said neighborhood until
rehabilitation homes exist in at least seventy five percent (75%) of the other
neighborhood statistic areas within the Village.
D. The residential care home facility shall comply with all State and local codes.
E. Any residential care home shall provide, at a minimum, one off-street parking place
for each two (2) residents or employees on the premises except that foster care homes
and family care homes shall provide parking in accordance with the zoning district
in which it is located.
F. Any residential care home shall provide, at a minimum, one bedroom for every
two (2) residents and one room for every one and one-quarter (1.25) residents.
G. All applications for a residential care home shall also address the following:
1. Purpose of facility.
2. Clients to be served (age group, problems, number of clients).
3. Area to be served (name of each municipality located within area and number
of clients residing therein).
4. Nature of supervision, both professional and nonprofessional.
5. Treatment program.
6. Adequacy of the facility for intended purpose in terms of bedrooms, kitchen,
recreation, yard space, off-street parking.
7. Licensing requirements.
R
8. Financial condition (including submission of applicant's annual audit reports).
9. Community facilities expected to be used.
10. Location and numbers of other group facilities in the neighborhood, and
relationships, if any.
11. Building alterations, if any, needed to accommodate proposed program; and
improvements necessary to meet buildings codes.
12. Results of any meetings with community group, or homeowner or homeowner
tenant associations, or others' attempts to communicate with the neighborhood. (Ord.
3198, 3-16-82)
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL INC.
PRIMARY HEALTH CARE PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Suburban Primary Health Care Council Inc. shall provide a program
to facilitate access to primary health care in the corporate boundaries of the Village of
Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Suburban Primary Health Care Council Inc. and
approved herein, complies with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban
Development with respect to benefitting low- and moderate -income persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village President of the Village of Mount Prospect and the
Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a contract for Community Development
Block Grant implementation, which contract is between the Village of Mount Prospect and
Suburban Primary Health Care Council Inc. a not-for-profit corporation, said contract is
attached to this Resolution.
SECTION M: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
Mayor
This Agreement is entered into this day of 9 1990, by and
between the Village of Mount Prospect, a bodypoliticof the State of -Illinois (hereinafter
referred to as the "VILLAGE" and the Suburban Primary Health Care Council (hereinafter
referred to as the "COUNCIL'), an Illinois Not -for -Profit Corporation.
SECI710NI
W11#2r,
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to
as CDBG funds) by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter
referred to as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the COUNCIL for
operation of a program to facilitate access to primary health care for low- and moderate -
income residents of the Village of Mount Prospect as outlined in the Scope of Services
attached herewith as Exhibit "X.
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services with the COUNCIL up to a maximum
of $15,000.00 and the COUNCIL agrees to abide by the provisions and regulations of the
1974 Housing and Community Development Act, as amended under which said contract is
made, and to use said contract funds for the purposes set forth in Section I hereof and as
conditioned by the provisions of Section III next.
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be limited to
the maximum amount specified in Section 11, to the actual amount invoiced by the
COUNCIL, and only to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes.
Conditions of Contract
A. Indemnification. The COUNCIL agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless
the VILLAGE and each and everyone of its officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys,
insurers and successors from any and all claim, demands, causes of action, expenses,
injuries, losses or damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may
-1-
suffer as a result of any cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the
COUNCIL, or those acting under it, to conform to the statues, ordinances or other
regulations or requirements of any governmental authority, in connection with the
COLTNCn:s performance under this Agreement. The COUNCIL agrees to defend against
any claims brought or actions filed against the VTLLAGE with respect to the subject of the
indemnity contained herein, whether such claims or actions are rightfully or wrongfully
brought or filed. In case of such a claim brought or such an action filed, the VILLAGE
agrees that the COUNCIL may employ attorneys of its own selection to appear and defend
the claim or action on behalf of the VILLAGE, subject to reasonable approval by the
VILLAGE, at the expense of the COUNCIL The COUNCIL, at its option, shall have the
sole authority for the direction of the defense.
B. Non-discrimination, The COUNCIL, performing under this Agreement, shall not
discriminate against any worker, employee, or applicant or any member of the public,
because of race, creed, color, sex, age or national origin. Such affirmative action shall
include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer,
termination, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination rates of pay, other
forms of compensation, selection for training including apprenticeship. The COUNCIL
agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment,
notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discriminatory clause. This policy of non-
discrimination and affirmative action shall be applicable with regard to both COUNCIUs
internal personnel practices and its actions in the performance of this Agreement. The
COUNCIL agrees and authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance reviews
or any other procedures to assure compliance with these provisions, subject to applicable
laws and regulations concerning privacy with reasonable notice to the COUNCIL.
C. Examination of Records, The COUNCIL will, at all times, give HUD, the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized
representative, access to, and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents
related to the contract, in accordance with state and federal law. Said records shall include
verification of household income and information on race or national origin. Eligible
households for this program must have incomes below those noted in Exhibit C. The
COUNCIL may establish program income criteria below that noted in Exhibit C.
D. Eiling of Records, The COUNCIL shall file with the VILLAGE such duplicates
of records covering such activities to be performed in whole or in part, as specified in
Exhibit 'W'.
E. Availability of !,,,a—w. Regulations and Qrs. The VILLAGE shall, upon the
request of the COUNCIL, provide it with copies of all laws, regulations and orders,
including those cited in this contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant
funded programs, or which might otherwise affect the performance of this Agreement.
-2-
The COUNCIL shall, at all times, observe and comply with all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government which may in any manner
affect the performance of this Agreement, and the COUNCIL shall be required to perform
all acts under this Agreement in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the
Federal Government, is or would be required to perform such acts.
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file all
necessary documents with HUD and shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations
necessary to facilitate acquisition of funds approved for this program by HUD. The
COUNCIL, shall not file any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of its officers or
employees as a result of this contract, except that this Section shall not act as a bar to any
lawsuits arising from the negligent or willfully wrongful acts of the VILLAGE or any of its
officers or employees.
Billing n Reporting Arran em n s
Pursuant to this Agreement, the VILLAGE will disburse CDBG funds to the
COUNCIL on the following basis:
1. The VILLAGE shall allocate the $15,000.00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in this Agreement. The COUNCIL shall submit no more than one
invoice per month far an amount equal to one -twelfth of the contract amount.
Every month, the COUNCIL shall submit to the VILLAGE a Monthly
Performance Report. Said report shall include available information on:
a. 'Each Mount Prospect client served during the month, showing the client's
COUNCIL number, address, and type(s) of service rendered. Services may
also include number of applications received and the number of applicants
approved for the program.
-3-
The first report shall be due on June 10, 1990. All others shall be submitted no
later than the 10th of the month.
2. A final report shall accompany the COUNCIUs final billing and regular monthly
report in May of 1991. This report will highlight the accomplishments of the
program over the past year, summarize for the fiscal year, from May 1, 1990 to
April 30, 1991, the number of Mount Prospect residents served by type of
assistances, and include the completion of Exhibit B herein attached.
SECTION VII
=1
This Agreement shall be valid from the date it is entered into thru April 30, 1990 and
may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. All costs associated
with the completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation
of all documentation required under Section VI.
SECTION VIII
The COUNCIL shall not assign this Agreement or any part thereof and the COUNCIL
shall not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to become due hereunder without
the prior written approval of the Village Manager. Any transfer or assignment of funds
pursuant to this Agreement, either in whole or in part, or any interest therein which shall
be due to the COUNCIL shall be deemed of no force or effect and shall not be binding
upon the VILLAGE.
-4-
Notices and communications under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certified
mail, postage prepared, to the respective parties as follows:
to the VILLAGE:
Mr. David M. Clements
Director of Planning and Zoning
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the COUNCIL:
President
Suburban Primary Health Care Council
211 West Chicago Avenue
Hinsdale, Illinois 60521-3355
This Agreement is entered into this __2 day of 1990.
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BY:
President of
the Village
ATTEST:
Board
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
Village Clerk
COUNCIL
e� co
ATTEST:
BY, —u-t6i't'irector.)
C� 0
EQ
Notary Public
r------------
OFFICIAL SEAL
L
K LEEN A.
KATHLEEN O'DONNELLI
NOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF ILLINOIS
L
MY COMMISSION EXPIRES 11/8/93
EXHIBIT A
THE ACCESS TO CARE PROGRAM
In Illinois, 1.5 million persons are without public or
private health insurance coverage. Between 50 and 60 percent of
the uninsured live in Cook County. Most are unable to afford
even basic health care services.
The Access to Care program allows access to basic health
care services for uninsured suburban Cook County residents with
limited income. Demonstration projects are operational in two
suburban areas. The northwest demonstration area, where the
program became operational in December, 1988, includes the
townships of Barrington, Elk Grove, Hanover, Maine, Palatine,
Schaumburg and Wheeling. The south demonstration area became
operational in may, 1989 includes the townships of Rich and
Bloom.
Any resident of the demonstration area with a family income
less than twice the poverty level who is uninsured for primary
health care and ineligible for public programs, such as Medicaid
and Medicare, may enroll in the program. Enrollees will be able
to obtain primary health care services from participating Access
To care providers and pay only a small co -payment to providers.
Covered services include physician office visits, routine
laboratory, x-ray and pharmacy services.
Access to Care physicians are family practice, internal
medicine, and pediatric specialists who see clients in private
office settings with the exception of the arrangement between the
Council and the Lutheran General Medical Group where clients are
cared for at the Nessett Health Center in Park Ridge.
Registration is at Township offices; the Villages of Mt.
Prospect, Schaumburg and Des Plaines; CEDA offices; the Cook
County Department of Public Health in Rolling Meadows and
Markham; and the Park Forest Health Department. Eligible clients
are able to select a first, second, and third choice Access to
Care physician at the time of registration. Appointments can be
made with the first choice physician immediately. The client
copy of the registration form serves as a temporary (thirty day)
patient identification. within thirty days, after Council staff
verifies the absence of health insurance coverage, a permanent
(one year) identification card is mailed to the client.
Physicians submit monthly reports and clients complete a
questionnaire which provide data for evaluation. Clients receive
resource inventories for preventive services available through
community agencies which are free or low cost. The Council has
coordination agreements with these agencies. These materials,
along with the questionnaire, are in english and spanish.
• - Exhibit B
1-9 lAT" DENEFITTING FROM IVITIES UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED - SERVICES OR ASSISTAKA
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE COUNCIL
Maximum H h1 n mLimits
1 $24,300
2 $2'7,750
3 $31,250
4 $34,700
$36,850
6 $39,050
$41,250
$43,400
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL INC.
BOXWOOD SUMMER PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council Inc. shall provide a special summer
program primarily for the children of Boxwood in the corporate boundaries of the "Village
of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Girl Scout Council and approved herein, complies
with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect
to benefitting low- and moderate -income persons; being that 60% or more of the children
served by this Program come from low- and moderate -income families.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village President of the Village of Mount Prospect and the
Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a contract for Community Development
Block Grant implementation, which contract is between the Village of Mount Prospect and
Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council, Inc. a not-for-profit corporation, said contract is attached
to this Resolution.
SECTION TWO; That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
M
This Agreement is entered into this day of , 1990, by and
between the Village of Mount Prospect, a b5Ty —politic of the State of 111 is (hereinafter
referred to as the "VH-IAGE" and Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council Inc., a not-for-profit
corporation of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the "COUNCIL.").
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to
as CDBG funds) by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter
referred to as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the COUNCIL for
operation of a special Summer program for the children of Boxwood as outlined in the
Scope of Services attached herewith as Exhibit "N'.
Amount of the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services with the COUNCIL up to a maximum
of $6,000.00 and the COUNCIL agrees to abide by the provisions and regulations of the
1974 Housing and Community Development Act, as amended under which said contract is
made, and to use said contract funds for the purposes set forth in Section I hereof and as
conditioned by the provisions of Section III next.
The VILLAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be limited to
the maximum amount specified in Section M to the actual amount invoiced by the
COUNCIL, and only to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes.
Conditions of Cotrart
A.i mita fication. The COUNCIL agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless
the tiIL.IAGE and each and everyone of its officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys,
insurers and successors from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, expenses,
injuries, losses or damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may
suffer as a result of any cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the
- 1 -
COUNCIL, or those acting under it, to conform to the statues, ordinances or other
regulations or requirements of any governmental authority, in connection with the
COUNCH:s performance under this Agreement. The COUNCIL agrees to defend against
any claims brought or actions filed against the VILLAGE with respect to the subject of the
indemnity contained herein, whether such claims or actions are rightfully or wrongfully
brought or filed. In case of such a claim brought or such an action filed, the COUNCIL
agrees that the VILLAGE may employ attorneys of its own selection to appear and defend
the claim or action on behalf of the VILLAGE at the expense of the COUNCIL The
VILLAGE, at its option, shall have the sole authority for the direction of the defense, and
shall be the sole judge of the acceptability of any compromise or settlement of any claims
or actions against the VILLAGE.
B. Non-discrimination, The COUNCIL, performing under this Agreement, shall not
discriminate against any worker, employee, or applicant or any member of the public,
because of race, creed, color, sex, age or national origin. Such affirmative action shall
include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer,
termination, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination rates of pay, other
forms of compensation, selection for training including apprenticeship. The COUNCIL
agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment,
notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discriminatory clause. This policy of non-
discrimination and affirmative action shall be applicable with regard to both COUNCII!s
internal personnel practices and its actions in the performance of this Agreement. The
COUNCIL agrees and authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance reviews
or any other procedures to assure compliance with these provisions.
C. Emmination of Records. The COUNCIL will, at all times, give HUD, the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the VHLIAGE, through any authorized
representative, access to, and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents
related to the contract, in accordance with state and federal law.
D. Filing of Records, The COUNCIL shall file with the VILLAGE such duplicates
of records covering such activities to be performed in whole or in part, as specified in
Exhibit "A".
E• Amilability of Regu)ago and Orders. The VILLAGE shall, upon the
request of the COUNCIL, provide it With copies of all laws, regulations and orders,
including those cited in this contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant
funded programs, or which might otherwise affect the performance of this Agreement.
-2-
The COUNCIL shall, at all times, observe and comply with all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government which may in any manner
affect the performance of this Agreement, and the COUNCIL, shall be required to perform
all acts under this Agreement in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the
Federal Government, is or would be required to perform such acts.
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VIIJAGE shall forthwith file
all necessary documents with HUD and shall comply, with all applicable rules and
regulations necessary to facilitate acquisition of funds approved for this program by HUD.
The COUNCIL shall not file any lawsuit against the VUIAGE or any of its officers or
employees as a result of this contract, except that this Section shall not act as a bar to any
lawsuits arising from the negligent acts of the VH-IAGE or any of its officers or employees.
[WJIMZw=77
Pursuant to this Agreement, the VILLAGE will disburse CDBG funds to the
COUNCIL on the following basis:
1. The VIII -AGE shall allocate the $6,000.00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in this Agreement. The COUNCIL shall submit one invoice to the
VILLAGE with a comprehensive performance report and completed Exhibit B
upon conclusion of its performance under this Agreement. Said comprehensive
performance report shall include information on:
a. Number of children participating in program per day
b. Number of hours of activity for children per day
c. Types of activities provided to children
d. Number of trips taken and number of children on each
e. HUD Form 4078 (1-76) regarding population benefitting.
-3.
I All costs billed to the Village shall be computed on the basis of actual cost as
follows:
a. Staff maximum compensation:
Director (1) S 600.00
Assistant Director (1) 400.00
Adult Assistant (6) at $350.00 each 2,100.00
Student Assistant (5) at $130 each 650.00
b. Actual cost of transportation not to exceed five (5) field
trips and 12 trips to River Trails Jr. High: $1,200.00
c. Actual costs of office supplies, program supplies,
food and drinks, registrations, insurance, admission fees
and custodial fee, not to exceed a total of: $ 920.00
-, WTU0=7
This, Agreement shall be valid until April 30, 1991 and may be terminated by either
party upon thirty (30) days written notice. All costs associated with the completed tasks
shall be billed to the Village and reimbursed upon presentation of all documentation
required under Section VI.
Assignment
The COUNCIL shall not assign this Agreement or any part thereof and
COLTNCEL shall not tra-rsfer or aujw, --;.-ry Ivr4ijj rw w r r w - " --A
A'arE, *r MY RMYTTIZeremwral
shall be due to the COUNCIL shall be deeforce med of no or effect and shal
binding upon the VULAGE.
-4.
Notices and communications under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certified
mail, postage prepared, to the respective parties as follows:
to the VILLAGE:
Mr. David M. Clements
Director of Planning and Zoning
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the COUNCIL
Dr. Henry Scott
Executive Director
Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council, Inc.
570 East Higgins Road
Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007
This Agreement is entered into this
Village Clerk
day of 1 1990.
THE VIUAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BY:
President of the Village
Board
ILLINOIS PRAIRM GM SCOUT
COUNCIL INC. an Illinois
not-for-profit corporation
ATTEST: BlY
Executive ive Director
Notapy-Public e'j Q-- - wW subwn%ed I--- w
Im &Y of
auat.r art aero
-5 - Wamss my /goad "d off iciest swL
.--P W CM91== W. Mr. 13.1vu I NMWTPWk
06-11-90 12:M I P G S C
Illinois Prairie Girl Soextt ftmcil, rM,
BOXM= SL"R ROMW, F'irSC&L YEAR 1990
T -I
The ##.. of
for children, from the Boxwood is to Provide safe, w4xrvised activities
Safari C1111drOn will*y � Through Summer
given the cpportunity to experience fellowship,
on, =aft, 9&ws and songs
.rp. # v # e. With children# u diverse
It is cur intention that the leaders dedicate Uwaselves to cre tiM
trwthe children.# •-0
Sumer
Safari #• # q Girl Scout
# # 1
Shouldbe incoxpoisted:
I. Pealizo
self -potential
2. Develop values
3. Ccrftlbjte to
Society
4. Palate to others
`,• p..
lihnof
through a
#t er^.. :. #w " # .raw offered
__
4 r ». # . „. -0 ',.. * w #• 26 to August
w, of ` • �..sd e •aw :::.:: • e rt .� _ and
ildren will be in attendance at the
Prograu # wr
10:00 aJA- to 3:00 p.m. Tuesdays and W
dLUdm Will be at River Trails
variety Of activities Including: "HiO School
Uk-wr*WdM T-shirts
iTft Aid activities
JWII#s • io# # „ (Field Dey)
Thou weekg
Start-t011ini; and
literature
Variety 'of crafts such as: wftvizq, stained
glass picture project
00O)OOut
- NOW Gana ftstival
- Songs
Creative M-Matics
# w,
Plural wr- activities, r
helping b #
diversity
ppowM (contiroied) .
r •w� ,rYn
- Nature eoq)ert will do nature activities
- Streaker will discuss sUbetance abuse/self-esteem
- Put Store Cwner
- Librarian from the Mt. Prospect Library
Thursday field trips will include:
Y. Happy .er*--r for Tleans CbUrse
Broddield Zoo
July 19 - crystal take Beach
July 26 - Mastan of .a and Industry
Pic-tic,•.r . OlYrPics
A. 1,='
Met Oil
'M* director of this grogram has 6 years eaqperienoe in providing the
Scanner program to children. She will be one of the trainers for the
three training s+essyions the staff will be attending in June.
LT—.,-! _' r� .
a. .• »Iw . � .' ♦ fw
., - .fw ww. •.Y w • r ..
•I ► - w•.. s•w. .r i
•a 1 - f w • r _
—2—
BUDGET:
Staff Di$600.00
rec:tar
Assistant Director $400.00
Adat Unit Lst' (6) at $350 $2100.00
ttLvIent Unit A iatat� (6) at $130 170-SO$3880.00
Tran rt ionTTrips; $600.00
S Fimld
12 Tope from Euclid to River Trails $1200.00
• MY • drink,
reg;istration,
4 i,,� M 4}N
•:
$6000-00
brought on f .' qp'.e•
-aw additional transportation Ikirges
dwVe in location, result in a Mt ir� Of
•00 00
We are W=king
with the VillagO to resolve this problem.
-3-
Exhibit 8
1.91 FMLATION DENEFITTING FR6m Acr#VITIES UNDERWAY OR COMPLETED — SERVICES OR A y
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUTS
Permission Form for Stier Safari Adventure Program
Peretiso especial para el prograw 'Suwrer Safari"
Exhibit C
The parent's specific permission is required for your child to go on a Field Trip. This additional
information would be needed in case of an emergency.
Se requlere el permiso especifico de los padres para que su niflo(a) pueda asistir a los paseos.
Esta informacidn es necesaria en casos de emergencia.
Mother's Home Phone Work Phone
Telefono 8 Casa de la madre Telefono trabajo madre
Father's Home Phone Work Phone
Telefono a casa del padre Telefono trabajo padre
Name of Emergency Contact
Contacto para emergencias
Relationship to child
Relacidn con el niNo(a)
Emergency's Home Phone Work Phone
Telefono contacto emergencias Casa Telefono trabajo
Family Physician
Medico de FaniIia Name /Nombre city /Ciudad
Phone N
Telefono
Is your child taking medication? No Yes
Toma medicinos el nino(a)? lio Si
If so, what
Si toms, que?
Date of last tetanus shot, 1. 1. 3» (include child's name)
Fecha de la ultima vacuna de tetanos (incluye nombre de niAo)
Allergic to:
Alergias
Restricted activities are#
Actividades restringidas
I give permission for my daughter(s)/son(s)r
to participate in the Summer Safari Program and to
participate in all activities, including the Field
Trips# to receive emergency medical treatment if neces-
sary and to appear in pictures for publicity purposes.
I certify that my daughters)/sons(s) are in good
health and has/have not been exposed to any contagious
diseases. I have read all the program information and
agree to abide by any regulations. I am willing to
have my daughter(s) be a Girl Scout(s).
Doy penniso para que mi hijo(hija)/s: ,
participe en el Programa Safari de Merano, y en
todas las actividades incluyendo los paseos; para
recibir tratamiento medico de emergencia si fuera
necesario; y, para aparecer en fotografias con propdsito
pubiicitarlo. Yo certifico que mi hijo(hija)/s estdn en
buen estado de salud y que no han sido expuestos a
enfennedades infecto-contagiosas. He leido todo el
formulario de informacidn del programa y estoy de
acuerdo en aceptar todas las regulaciones. Estoy
dispuesta a que mi hija(s) sea una Girl Scout.
Signature of Patent/Guardian Date
Firma del Padre/Pladre/Guardian Fecha
PARENTS ARE WELCOME To vISIT THE PROGRAM AT ANY TINE. HOWEVER, IF YOU WOULD BE WILLING TO HELP, CHECK YOUR
PREFERENCE BELOW,
LOS PADRES SERAN BIENYENIDOS PARA ASISTIR AL PROGRAMA EN CUALQUIER MOMENTO. SIN EMBARGO, SI QUISIERAN AYUDAR
MARQUE SU PREFERENCIA:
Chaperone a Field Trip
Cuidador Paseos
Help with an activity (such as crafts)
Ayudar en cualquier actividad (manualidades)
Share a hobby or career with the children
Compartir, enseriar una habilidad o hobbie con los
ninos(as)
Staff Position
Ser parte del personal en el programa
ILLINOIS PRAXJrff'GZRL SCOUTS
REGISTRATION FOR SUMMER SAFARI
HOJA DE REGISTRO PARA EL SUMMER SAFARI
_ Yes, I want to register my child (children) for Summer Safari 1990
Si, quisiera registrar a mi hijo(a)/s para,el Safari de Verano 1990
I s t child
Primer Name Grade in Fall Age as of 611/90
nitro Nombre Nivel escolar en el otono Edad desde 6/1/90
Birthday Troop N (If registered Girl Scout)
Cumpleanos Cuadrilla Troop N (si es Girl Scout)
Girl Boy (Circle Che)
Nina Nino (Indicar uno)
2nd child
Segundo Name Grade in Fall Age as of 6/1/90
nitro Nombre Nivel escolar en el otono Edad desde 6/1/90
Birthday Troop N (If registered Girl Scout)
Cumpleanos Cuadrilla Troop N (si es Girl Scout)
Girl Boy (Circle Che)
Nina Nino (Indicar uno)
3rd child
Tercdr Name Grade in Fall Age as of 6/1/90
'nitro Nombre Nivel escolar en el otono Edad desde 6/1/90
Birthday Troop N (If registered Girl Scout)
Cumpleanos Cuadrilla Troop N (si es Girl Scout)
Girl Boy (Circle Cine)
Nina Nino (Indicar uno)
School child(ren) attend
Escuela que atienden los nitros
Parent's Name
Nombre de madre/padre
Address
Direccidn number street city zip
Ndmero calle caudad zip
Home Phone N Parent's Work Phone N
Teldfono de casa Teldfono de empleo de padre(s)
F1 i am interested in Financial Assistance.
Me interesa obtener apoyo financiero.
Amount of money enclosed (check or money order)
Cantidad de dinero incluido (cheque 6 giro)
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD
TODOIS NUMEROS DE PERSONAS EN SU CASA
($4.00 per child)
(4.00 par Wino)
Annual Incomes
Below $24,300 $31,250-$34,700 $39,050-$41,250
(check one)
$24,300-$27.750 $34,700-$36,850 $41,250-$43,400
Salario anual:
$27,750-$31,250 $36,850-$39,050 Above $43,400
O ndicar uno)
PLEASS CpxPLSTa OTBER SID9 OF FORM BffrM8 MAZLrJFG
POR FAVOR COMPLETAR EL OTRO LIDO ANTES OE ENVIAR
04-6210-1-01-07 6490/6-90
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND
ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT COUNCIL INC.
BOXWOOD ADVOCACY PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect is a recipient of funds under the Community
Development Block Grant Program; and
WHEREAS, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect that Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council Inc. shall provide an Advocacy
Program for the residents of Boxwood in the corporate boundaries of the Village of Mount
Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the program proposed by the Girl Scout Council and approved herein, complies
with the requirements of the Department of Housing and Urban Development with respect
to benefitting low- and moderate -income persons; being that 60% or more of the residents
in Boxwood are low- and moderate -income.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
5ECTION ONE, That the Village President of the Village of Mount Prospect and the
Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute a contract for Community Development
Block Grant implementation, which contract is between the Village of Mount Prospect and
Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council, Inc. a not-for-profit corporation, said contract is attached
to this Resolution.
SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after its
passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
I
Mayor
This Agreement is entered into this day of '1990, by and
between the Village of :Mount Prospect, a body politic of the State of Illinois (hereinafter
referred to as the "VILLAGE" and Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council Inc., a not-for-profit
corporation of the State of Illinois (hereinafter referred to as the "COUNCIL").
As a grantee of Community Development Block Grant funds (hereinafter referred to
as CDBG funds) by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (hereinafter
referred to as HUD), the VILLAGE elects to contract for services with the COUNCIL for
operation of a Boxwood Advocacy Program for the residents of Boxwood as outlined in the
Scope of Services attached herewith as Exhibit "A".
Amounj qf the Grant
The VILLAGE does hereby contract for services with the COUNCIL up to a maximum
of $14,000.00 and the COUNCIL agrees to abide by the provisions and regulations of the
1974 Housing and Community Development Act, as amended under which said contract is
made, and to use said contract funds for the purposes set forth in Section I hereof and as
conditioned by the provisions of Section III next.
The VII.LAGE's contractual obligation as identified in Section I shall be limited to
the maximum amount specified in Section II, to the actual amount invoiced by the
COUNCIL, and only to the extent such amount is received from HUD for such purposes.
Conditions of Cgntract
A. IndemmfiggtiQn. The COUNCIL agrees to indemnify and save and hold harmless
the VILLAGE and each and everyone of its officers, agents, employees, servants, attorneys,
insurers and successors from any and all claims, demands, causes of action, expenses,
injuries, losses or damages of whatever kind, character of description the VILLAGE may
suffer as a result of any cause, matter, act, or omission arising out of the failure of the
- 1 -
COUNCIL, or those acting under it, to conform to the statues, ordinances or other
regulations or requirements of any governmental authority, in connection with the
COUNCM:s performance under this Agreement. The COUNCIL agrees to defend against
any claims brought or actions filed against the VILLAGE with respect to the subject of the
indemnity contained herein, whether such claims or actions are rightfully or wrongfully
brought or filed. In case of such a claim brought or such an action filed, the COUNCIL
agrees that the VILLAGE may employ attorneys of its own selection to appear and defend
the claim or action on behalf of the VILLAGE at the expense of the COUNCIL The
VILLAGE, at its option, shall have the sole authority for the direction of the defense, and
shall be the sole judge of the acceptability of any compromise or settlement of any claims
or actions against the VILLAGE.
B. Non-discHminatiQn. The COUNCIL, performing under this Agreement, shall not
discriminate against any worker, employee, or applicant or any member of the public,
because of race, creed, color, sex, ,age or national origin. Such affirmative action shall
include, but not be limited to the following: employment, upgrading, demotion or transfer,
termination, recruitment or recruitment advertising, layoff or termination rates of pay, other
forms of compensation, selection for training including apprenticeship. The COUNCIL
agrees to post in conspicuous places available to employees and applicants for employment,
notices setting forth the provisions of this non-discriminatory clause. This policy of non-
discrimination and affirmative action shall be applicable with regard to both COUNCIL's
internal personnel practices and its actions in the performance of this Agreement. The
COUNCIL agrees and authorizes the VILLAGE and HUD to conduct compliance reviews
or any other procedures to assure compliance with these provisions.
C. Examination Qf__Rgsg1d$, The COUNCIL will, at all times, give HUD, the
Comptroller General of the United States, and the VILLAGE, through any authorized
representative, access to, and the right to examine all records, books, papers or documents
related to the contract, in accordance with state and federal law.
D. Filingof Records, The COUNCIL shall file with the VILLAGE such duplicates
of records covering such activities to be performed in whole or in part, as specified in
Exhibit "A7.
E. Ay-ailability of egulations and Ordta. The VILLAGE shall, upon the
request of the COUNCIL, provide it with copies of all laws, regulations and orders,
including those cited in this contract, which regulate the operation of the Block Grant
funded programs, or which might otherwise affect the performance of this Agreement.
-2-
Qmpbance th Laws,
The COUNCIL shall, at all times, observe and comply with all laws, ordinances or
regulations of the Federal, State, County and local government which may in any manner
affect the performance of this Agreement, and the COUNCIL shall be required to perform
all acts under this Agreement in the same manner as the VILLAGE, as a contractor of the
Federal Government, is or would be required to perform such acts.
Subsequent to the execution of this Agreement, the VILLAGE shall forthwith file all
necessary documents with HUD and shall comply with all applicable rules and regulations
necessary to facilitate acquisition of funds japproved for this program by HUD. The
COUNCIL, shall not file any lawsuit against the VILLAGE or any of its officers or
employees as a result of this contract, except that this Section shall not act as a bar to any
lawsuits arising from the negligent acts of the VILLAGE or any of its officers or employees.
RUPWROM
Pursuant to this Agreement, the VILLAGE will disburse CDBG funds to the
COUNCIL on the following basis:
1. The VILLAGE shall allocate the $14,000.00 contract amount for the services
stipulated in this Agreement. The COUNCIL, shall submit no more than one
invoice per month for an amount equal to one-tenth of the contract amount.
Every two months, the COUNCIL shall submit to the VILLAGE a Bi -Monthly
Performance Report. Said report shall include information on the:
a. Number of Boxwood residents attending programs or activities. The name
of the program or activity and date offered.
b. Number of Boxwood residents contacted on an informal basis, nature of the
contact.
,3,
c. Number of referrals made to other agencies.
d. Major accomplishments of the two-month period and list objectives for the
next two months.
The first report shall be due on October 10, 1990. All others shall be submitted
no later than the 10th of the month.
2. A final report shall accompany the COUNCILs final billing in May of 1991. This
report will highlight the accomplishments of the program over the past year,
indicate what unmet needs still remain and itemize all actual cost incurred during
the program year. The actual cost shall not exceed the cost of the program to
the VIII -AGE. HUD Form 4078 (1-76) regarding population benefitting (Exhibit
B) and a certification form (Exhibit C) for each child, shall be completed and also
returned to the Village as part of the final report.
This Agreement shall be valid from the date it is entered into thru April 30, 1991 and
may be terminated by either party upon thirty (30) days written notice. All costs associated
with the completed tasks shall be billed to the VILLAGE and reimbursed upon presentation
of all documentation required under Section VI.
ASS ignmgM
The COUNCIL shall not assign this Agreement or any part thereof and the COUNCIL
shall not transfer or assign any funds or claims due or to become due hereunder without
the prior written approval of the Village Manager. Any transfer or assignment of funds
pursuant to this Agreement, either in whole or in part, or any interest therein which shall
be due to the COUNCIL shall be deemed of no force or effect and shall not be binding
upon the VILLAGE.
.4-
Notices and communications under this Agreement shall be sent registered or certified
mail, postage prepared, to the respective parties as follows:
to the VILLAGE:
Mr. David M. Clements
Director of Planning and Zoning
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
to the COUNCIL.
Dr. Henry Scott
Executive Director
Illinois Prairie Girl Scout Council, Inc.
576 East Higgins Road
Elk Grove Village, Illinois 60007
ThisAgreementis entered into this day of .1990.
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BY:
President of the Village
ATTEST- Board
Village Clerk ILLINOIS PRAIRIE GIRL SCOUT
COUNCIL INC an Illinois
not-for-profit corporation
ATTEST: B
- xecutive�irector����
Public e-4
4"ICKIM &Y
,19
DMYWWW Wi0ws' my hand and jjjjW,.L
WfAW K" StATI a UWX Notary PoUic
"r cawl"" W. K". 14111i4xd
06-11-90 12:41
I P u 5 C 304 P05
In fiscal Year 1990, the BoxWood Advoaw-y Program will:
=tirlue its Year around
recreation*lauydxgProgram
r day a week sessiomoffering creative leamirq that
111 :. # :..
exercise both themind and the body. program will'imlUde, Saturday
e=IrSicM for Al once a month.
2. assist residents and .1 b. ♦AW
assisociation in Meeting their
needs arl Plwv'iM for the future. Such activities would include:
a. actirq as staff supporttoanoverall
•rm of the w
" .r wwr
that can • Ts b •.." rA Ar P. F
ity at large
and express them appropriately;
b. making referm's to Other agencies 41en appropriate in order
to assist residents• their
WOrkirg with the Village staff On BoxW00d
neiOtoxhood
activities ♦ communicating
t* r.., * ally*
3.
promote the B=jo0d ♦rn.AA. i
a. with appropriate
b.
reside
by c * goodrelations.1A r w
ASSOcUtions and others in the rr 1e
-4-
.... Exhibit
hs POPULATION BENEFITTING SROM ACTIVITIES UNOERWAV OR COMPLETEO — SERVICES OR ASSISTAAA"
ILLIRM fmaze QIRL .RC`om
Exp ibiC C
Permission Form for Su mor Safari Adventure Program
Pormiso especial para el programa *Summmr Safari*
The parent's specific permission is required for your child to go on a Field Trip. This additional
Information would be needed In use of an emergency.
Se requiere el permiso especlfico do los padres para quo su nino(a) pueda asistir a los paseos.
Esta informacidn as necesaria an casos de emergencia.
Mother's Rome Phone Mork Phone
Teldfono a case de I# madre Toldfono trabajo madre
Father's Rome Phone Mork Phone
Teldfono a case del padre TelEfono trabajo padre
Nan@ of Emergency Contact
Contacto para eGiergencias
Relationship to child
Relacidn con el nino(a)
Emergency's Rome Phone Mork Phone
Teldfono contacto emergencies casa TelEfono trabajo
Family Physician
Medico de Familia Name /Nombre city /Ciudad
Phone F
Teldfono
Is your child taking medication? No Yes
Toma medicinos el nino(a)? No Si
If so, what
Si tome, qud?
Date of last tetanus shot+ 1. ?. 3. (include child's name)
Fecha de la uitima vacuna de tBtanos (incluye nombre de nifto)
Allergic to:
Alergias
Restricted activities are:
Actividades restringidas
I give permission for my daughtor(s)/son(s):
to participate in the Summer Safari Program and to
participate in all activities, including the Field
Trips: to receive emergency medical treatment if neces-
sary and to appear in pictures for publicity purposes.
I certify that my daughters)/sons(s) are in good
health and has/have not been exposed to any contagious
diseases. I have read all the program information and
agree to abide by any regulations. I an willing to
have my daughter(s) be a Girl Scout(#).
Doy permiso para quo mi hijo(hija)/s:
participe an el Programa Safari de Verano, y en
todas las actividades incluyendo los paseos; para
recibir tratamiento medico de emergencia si fuera
necesario; y, para aparecer en fotografias con prop6sito
publicitario. Yo certifico que mi hijo(hija)/s estAn en
buen estado de salud y qua no han sido expuestos a
enfermedades infecto-contagiosas. He leido todo el
formularlo de informacl6n del programa y estoy de
acuerdo en aceptar todas las regulaciones. Estoy
dispuesta a que mi hija(s) sea una Girl Scout.
Signature of Parent/Guardian DoCe
Firma del Padre/Fiadre/Guardian Fecha
PARENTS ARE wrwoME To vlSlr THE PROGRAM AT MY PINE. RGMEvER, IF You MouW aE MILLING Tu HELP, CHECK YOUR
PREFERENCE 9ELOwt
LOS PADRES SERAN BiENVENIDOS PARA ASISTIR AL PROGRAMA EN CUALQUIER MOMENTO. SIN EMBARGO. $1 QUISIERAN AYUDAR
MARQUE SU PREFERENCIA:
Chaperone a Field Trip
Cuidador Paseos
Help with an activity (such as crafts)
Ayudar en cualquier actividad (manualidades)
Share a hobby or career with the children
Compartlr. enseaar una habilidad o hobbie con los
ninos(as)
Stafi Position
Ser parte del personal an el programa
ZLU*Gr$ PRA1RZa''GIJtL SCOW
R8GZSTRATZON FOR ZNL *. op AF;rN;-e— CraYssa Y
HOJA DE REGISTRO PARA EL SUMMER SAFARI
Yes, Z want to register my child (children) for Summer Safari 1990
Sf, quisiera registrar a mi hijo(a)/s para el Safari de Merano 1990
1st child
Primer Name Grade in Fall Age as of 671790
niAo Nombre Nivel escolar an el otoAo Edad desde 6/1/90
Birthday Troop N (Zf registered Girl Scout)
Cumpleanos Cuadrilla Troop / (si as Girl Scout)
Girl Boy (Circle Che)
NiAa Nino (Indicar uno)
2nd child
Segundo Name Grade in Fall Age as of 6/1/90
niAo Nombre Nivel escolar an al otoAo Edad desde 6/1/90
Birthday Troop M (Zf registered Girl Scout)
Cumpleahos Cuadrilla Troop 0 (si as Girl Scout)
Girl Boy (Circle Che)
Nifla Niflo (Indicar uno)
3rd child
Tercdr Name Grade In Fall Age as of 6/1/90
nifio Nombre Nivel escolar an el otoAo 'Edad desde 6/1/90
Birthday Troop K (Zf registered Girl Scout)
Cumpleanos Cuadrilla Troop i (si as Girl Scou£')�-"""
Girl Boy (Circle one)
Nifia Nifio (Indicar uno)
School child(ren) attend
Escuela qua atienden los nirios
Parent's Name
Nombre de madre/padre
Address
Direccibn number street city zip
Ndmero calla Ciudad zip
Nome Phone N
Tel4fono de Casa
Parent's Work Phone N
Tel4fono de empieo de padre(s)
Z am Interested In Financial Assistance.
Me interesa obtener apoyo financiero.
Amount of money enclosed (check or money order) S
Cantidad de dinero incluido (cheque d giro)
NUMBER OF PERSONS IN HOUSEHOLD
TODOS RUNFROS DE PERSONAS EN SU CASA
($4.00 per child)
(4.00 por nitro)
Annual Income: Below $24,300 $31,250-$34,700 $39,050-$41,250
(check one) $24,300-$27,750 $34,700-$36,850 $41,250-$43,400
Salario anual: $27,750-$31,250 $36,850-$39,050 Above $43,400 M
(indicar uno) FLYMN CCNWLBTN ormm ,SIDE of FtNm wroRs MAILrxa
FOR FAVOR COMPLETAR EL OTRO LADO ANTES DE ENVIAR
0A-K,>1n_i_ni_n*7 6490/6-90
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
A- 6-
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director CA,
U_
DATE: June 13, 1990
SUBJECT: Budget Amendment for the Fiscal Year Ended April 30, 1990
For the past several months, I have been aware that we would be overexpended in
several funds for the fiscal year ending April 30, 1990. However, because of
the uncertainty of specific amounts I waited until after the close of the fiscal
year to request the required budget amendment. The funds that are overexpended
are: the Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund by $9,887; Benefit Trust #2 by
$2,728; the Risk Management Fund by $154,012; and the Debt Service Funds by $332.
Following are explanations of these increases:
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund - In January 1990 the Village's IMRF
contribution rate increased from 8,76% to 10.30%. This change resulted
in additional costs of approximately $16,000.
Benefit Trust #2 - This is a new fund established in the current fiscal
year to account for the pension benefits for Paul Watkins. The amount
overexpended represents a reimbursement to the Fire Pension Fund for
benefits for March and April, 1989.
Risk Management Fund - The amount overexpanded in this fund is due to
higher reserves established by the Village's Insurance Administrator for
claims incurred prior to January 1, 1990 and for one significant liability
claim that occurred in February 1990. 1 should point out that these
increased budget amounts do not reflect settlements but only the provision
for settlements in the future.
Debt Service Funds - The amounts overexpended represent higher bank fees
than had been anticipated.
Whenever monies are expended in excess of the amount budgeted at the fund level,
a budget amendment is required. Normally we make budget amendments in December
after our six-month budget review and then again in May or June if necessary.
The current amendment is in addition to an amendment adopted in January 1990.
I am requesting that the second reading of the ordinance be waived and the
ordinance adopted at the June 19, 1990 Village Board Meeting.
DCJ/sm
Schedule A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1989/90 Budget Amendments
April 30, 1990
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
24-092-07-9922 IMRF Pension Costs
All Other IMRF Fund
Amended IMRF Fund
Benefit Trust #2
31-092-07-9920 Pension Benefits
Expenditures
Budget as
Adopted and Proposed Budget as
Amended changes Amended
$ 305,000 $ 10,000 $ 315,000
270,000 - 270,000
575.000 lf. 5g5�5,O( 0
$ 26.000 3.290 29 0
Risk Manazement Fund
49-035-01-6721 Claims - General
$ 250,000
$145,000
$ 395,000
49-035-01-6722 Claims - Medical
_ 000
15.000
840,000
Risk Management Fund Changes
$ 1,075,000
$160,000
$ 1,235,000
All Other Risk Mgt. Fund
476,500
-
476,500
Amended Risk Mgt. Fund
$ 1,551,500
$16Q,002
1,711.500
Debt Service Funds
66-091-02-9560 Insurance Reserve - Int.
$ 14,940
$ 50
$ 14,990
70-091-02-9561 D/T Redvlp - Bank
600
450
3,050
Debt Service Fund Changes
$ 15,540
$ 500
$ 16,040
All Other Debt Service Fund
1,23LOOO
1,231,000
Amended Debt Service Fund
1,246,54Q
2
1,247,040
Summary of Changes
Total Changes
$ 3,399,040
$173,500
$ 3,572,540
All Other Funds
_ 3.571,440
33,571,,440
Amended Budget Totals
36,970,480
1173,500
$37.143.980
100-*CIMN16A""I
AN ORDINANCE MAKING CERTAIN AMENDMENTS TO THE ANNUAL
BUDGET ADOPTED FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING MAY 1,
1989 TO APRIL 30, 1990
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have passed and approved Ordinance No. 2342 which sets the finances of the
Village under the "Budget Officer System"' and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the aforesaid Ordinance and the Statutes of the State of
Illinois an annual budget for the fiscal year commencing May 1, 1989 to
April 30, 1990 was adopted through the passage of Ordinance No. 4044 approved
by the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect on April 18, 1989
and as amended by Ordinance No. 4139 adopted by the corporate authorities on
January 16, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
have reviewed certain additions and changes to the aforesaid budget for fiscal
1989/90; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
believe the changes, as specified on the attached 1989/90 budget amendment
pages, to be in the best interest of the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the fiscal year 1989/90 budget for the Village of Mount
Prospect is hereby amended, as detailed on Schedule "A" attached hereto.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and
after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form as provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED and APPROVED this 19th day of June, 1990
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
U
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
June 4, 1990
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
Attn: Mr. John Fulton Dixon
Village Manager
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS Re: Proposal for Professional Services
SCIENTISTS Schematic Design for the Village's
Public Safety Facility
Donohue's Project No. 17310.001
Dear Mr. Dixon:
At your request, we are submitting this proposal for additional
professional services to provide a Schematic Design Report for
Option A to achieve the following goals:
1. Develop the Option A conceptual design and confirm its
feasibility.
2. Refine the cost estimate, based on the more finalized
design. The goal will be to reduce construction cost as
much as possible.
3. Produce graphics that illustrate Option A in a manner
understandable by the public.
To achieve the above goals, we propose to perform the following
tasks:
1. Develop schematic design plans for Option A, that
incorporate space program requirements and eliminate
deficiencies. Included will be four (4) meetings with
appropriate village staff.
2. Perform a preliminary codes and regulations analysis.
3. Establish major building, envelope, interior, structural,
mechanical and electrical systems.
4. Establish the building's appearance. Included will be two
(2) meetings with Village staff.
IN 1501 W9odfield Road
Suite 200 East
Sd=unburg, Illinois 60173
70& 605.8800
Telefax 708 605 8914
5. Based on the schematic design, perform a detailed cost
estimate.
6. Produce a written report (20 copies), describing and
analyzing the schematic design and estimate. Included will
be two (2) meetings with Village staff.
7. Produce a site plan, floor plans, and building elevations
presentation quality drawings, illustrating the schematic
design.
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS 8.Produce a colored perspective rendering of the building.
SCIENTISTS 9. Attend a Village Board meeting to present the schematic
design.
The OWNER will upgrade his survey to provide topographic and
other information necessary to perform the above tasks.
We propose to -perform these additional professional services for
an added fee of $43,550.00. This is an amendment to our original
Agreement, dated August 9, 1989.
Conditional on your approval of this proposal by June 18, 1990,
we will meet your schedule for the November 1990 referendum.
If the above proposal is satisfactory, please indicate your
acceptance by signing below and returning one of the copies to
US.
We appreciate the opportunity to submit this proposal. Should
you have any questions regarding it, please contact Fred Borich
at (708) 605-8800, Ext. 143.
Very truly yours, Accepted by:
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Fred
Vice 5esoi
FJB:dlc
T/L/CFO
John Dixon
June 4, 1990
Page #
Authorized Signature
Title
Date .
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7W Cn1V tu
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE; June 14, 1990
SUBJECT: Sweeper Bid
On June 14, 1990, sealed bids were opened for a street sweeper
and related options. This unit is replacing a 1973 Elgin sweep-
er. on page 212 of the current budget, under account code 48-
077-93-8232, there is $80,000,allocated for this purchase.
Bid results, which include trade-in of existing sweeper and
optional equipment, are as follows:
Bidder make/Model Delivery Bid Price
Bruce Municipal
Equipment Co. Elgin Pelican "P" 70-84 days $78,400.82
Schuster Equip-
ment Company Athey Mobil H10A-2 5-10 days $84,392.00
Although specifications of the two machines differ, they both
are capable of accomplishing the intended use. I recommend
acceptance of the lowest bid of $78,400.82, as submitted by
Bruce Municipal Equipment Company.
HLW/td
Village of kount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE June 14, 1990
SUBJECT: Shared Cost Sidewalk Replacement Program
On June 13, 1990, at 10:00 A.M., sealed bids were received
for the Shared Cost Sidewalk Program. At this time, the sealed
bids were publicly opened and read aloud.
1414 RM to) 0 IV
There were four items listed in the bid package. The Bidder
was requested to submit a unit price per square foot for removal
and replacement of concrete walks, installation of new sidewalks
where none existed, curb & gutter removal and replacement, and
sidewalk removal and replacement at driveway aprons at various
locations throughout the Village.
BIDS RECEIVED
Six Contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total of
four Contractors submitted bids. The bids ranged from a low
$39,369.00 by A, Lahr Copstruction to a high of $72,690.00 by T.S.
Concrete Cgs Last year's contract for this annual program was for
$53.710,00 for a slightly larger quantity.
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds or Cashier'S Checks in the
amount of 10% of their total bid as required by the Contract
Documents. All Bidders, except for A. I&= Construction, signed
their Bid Proposal.
QUALIFICATIONS OF LOW BIDDER
The low Bidder is A. Lamy Cgnstraction Co., Des Plaines, IL.
This Contractor has not previously worked in Mount Prospect. The
Village Attorney stated that the failure to submit a signed
proposal form can be viewed as a technicality if the company can
supply a signed proposal form by 10:00 A.M., the next day. The
Contractor did submit the signed proposal form before the stated
deadline.
Page Two
Last year, this Contractor did a sidewalk and curb program for
the City of Rolling Meadows. I contacted Mr. Gary Black and his
comments were:
1.) Workmanship was fine
2.) Had equipment problem
3.) Had an insurance problem
4.) Completed 8,000 S.F. of walk in two months
5.) Basically, a father and two sons operation.
Later, I contact Mr. Joe Lamp, of A. Lamp Construction, about
this reference. I stated that our program is about 20,000 S.F. of
walk and, per contract, should be completed in 30 calendar days.
Mr. Lamp stated:
1.) They have purchased newer and more equipment.
2.) Insurance requirement should not be a problem this year.
Note: Village has contract stipulation that awarded
Contract can be voided if insurance certificate is not
received within two weeks after award.
3.) The 8,000 S.F. of walk done was mostly handicap ramping
and depressed curbing, which is a different and more time
consuming operation than our Shared Cost Program.
4.) Work force has been expanded to twelve people.
The second low bidder is Schroeder & Schroeder. This firm has
previously done village contracts, such as the Shared Cost Program.
RECOMMENDATION
The Engineering Division cannot verify the qualifications of
the low bidder, A. Lamp Construction. We can recommend the next
low bidder, Schroeder & Schroeder. This program is a very
"sensitive" Village resident program as to possible complaints due
to construction. There is a potential $10,000 savings involved.
Therefore, due to the above circumstances, no recommendation will
be made.
Page 3
Funding for this project will be from two accounts:
Account Code No. 1-071-04-8301 ($30,000),
Account Code No. 1-071-04-8302 ($50,000).
Bob Pszanka,
I concur with the above recommendation
Charles Bencic, Director of Inspection Services
I toncur with the above recommendation
ILA
Herbert L. Weeks, Director of Public Works
RP/m
Village of Mount Prospect
1990 Shared Cost Sidewalk Program
June 13, 1990
10:00 A.M.
Estimated [A. Lamp Construction
Yo. Item Quantity
1. Existing PCC Sidewalk Removal & Reptaccenco
10000 SF
Co.
2.04
20,400.00
2. New PCC Sidewalk Installation
5300 SF
1.84
9,752.00
3. PCC Curb do Gutter Remove do Replacement
100 LF
2.50
7.77
777.00
4. PCC Sidewalk Removal And Replacement
4000 SF
2.67
2.11
8.440.00
At Drive Aprons
13,780.00
3.30
m7
11.00
1,100.00
13.50
Total
1,350.00
39.369.00
oader & SchroedeI
JR&V C nsir N1oA
Co.
T.S. Concrete Co. lac
Plaines
Wood Dale
Harwood His
2.37
23,700.00
2.50
25,000.00
4.00
40,000.00
2.67
14,151.00
2.60
13,780.00
3.30
17,490.00
11.00
1,100.00
13.50
1,350.00
16.00
1.600.00
2.49
9,960.00
2.55
10,200.00
3.40
13,600.00
911.00 1 Total 1 50,330.00
MOUNT PROSPECT POLICE DEPARTMENT
FORMAL MEMORANDUM CHF 90-94
1 wnwlnurnbw
TO: JOHN FULTON DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: RONALD W. PAVLOCK, CHIEF OF POLICE
SUBJECT: POLICE TOWING CONTRACT
DATE: June 13, 1990
On June 12 1990 five bids for a new police towing contract were
opened. Ae following table displays a comparison of the bids
submitted in the most important service categories:
BASIC LIGHT ABANDONED BASIC ROAD
AUTO TRUCK AUTO AUTO SH =
TOW TOW TOW STORAGE CALL
Prospect Auto Body
Mt. Prospect
40.00
55.00
40.00
10.00
20.00
A.O.K. Towing
Des Plaines
45.00
55.00
45.00
10.00
25.00
Millman's Towing
Palatine
45.00
65.00/hr
45.00
15.00
25.00
Advance Towing
Mt. Prospect
45.00
75.00/hr
125.00/hr
15.00
25.00
Len & John's Towing
Prospect Heights 50.00 85.00/hr 50.00 15.00 20.00-
50.00
The review process for the bids included cost comparisons, site
inspections, equipment evaluations, and an analysis of service
capabilities. It is police staff's recommendation that the low
bidder, Prospect Auto Body, be awarded the police towing contract
for the time period of July 1, 1990 through June 30, 1993.
Prospect Auto Body is the current contract holder and substantially
meets all towing contract provisions and service requirements.
Please advise me if you wish any further explanation or details
reference this bid process.
RWP: j d
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN F. DIXON
FROM: DEPUTY CHIEF, DEL ULREICH P`�
�Jr
DATE: JUNE 15, 1990
SUBJECT: AMBULANCE RE CHASSIS
Sealed bids were opened at 10:00 a'm' on June 13, 1990 for the
purchase of a new ambulance chassis and the remount of an proposed
patient compartment module.
existing
Invitations to bid were sent to four emergency equipment builders.
Only one company submitted a proposal. Their bid is represented below.
EMERG A STAR $ 37,523
Funds have been designated for this purpose in the 1990/91 budget under
the account number 51-077-93-8101 appearing on page 212.
I do recommend the approval of this bid from EMERG 8 STAR.
Del iVreich
C
14
Customer Mount prospect Fire Department Date 6/11/90
PROPOSAL — ORDER
Quantity Description Price
1990 Ford Chassis per enclosed quotation $18,937.00
Remount and Refurbish your
per enclosed quotation. $181586.00
Trade-in of old chassis included.
Final Price Excluding all applicable taxes. $37,523.00
F.O.B. St. Louis, MO.
TERMS: See Remount and Chassis quotation for terms and payment requirements
DELIVERY: O calendar days after receipt of initial payments,
signedorder, chassis,andcustomer supplied equiomenf,.
All quotations honored for 30 days unless otherwise noted.
Total price excludes all applicable taxes unless otherwise noted.
M_- f- 0--n ('
znPt* agrees to purchase the items and services above
i655e- et to terms aA'cr_;e_.UD_it?3otn_s herein. ein.
FOR: xCLuI,tPr Dt
-Qgjp e re e . Date
FOR EMERGE -A -STAR Date lleo
4348 CLAYTON AVENUE - ST. LOUIS, MISSOURI 63110 * 3141535-8750 .
'WLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER �
DATE: JUNE 14, 1990
SUBJECT: SUMMARY OF PROPOSAL RECEIVED FOR THE BOXWOOD DRIVE
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
The Village of Mount Prospect has requested proposals for the reconstruction of Boxwood
Drive. The work will include the repaving of approximately 2,000 11 of street, installing 440
feet of new street on the north eastwest section of the street, removing 5,400 11 of curb
and gutter and installing 7,400 11 of new curb and gutter, 9 new catch basins, relocating 5
fire hydrants, relocating 30 parkway trees and planting ten new parkway trees. A notice to
bidders was published in the Mount Prospect Herald on May 25, 1990 identifying the scope-
of
copeof work and a bid opening date of June 13, 1990. Four bidders obtained bid documents and
one submitted a bid on June 13. The bidder was:
Arrow Road Construction Company $325,758.02
Staff and our consultant have reviewed this bid. Our consultant, Midwest Engineering states
that the bid is approximately 5.5% higher than their estimate for the project, and
recommends it be accepted. Staff would note that the contractor is [DOT certified, and has
indicated he is capable of completing the work on time, which is by August 24, 1990. This
deadline has been set in order to eliminate any potential student, vehicular problems when
classes begin at Euclid School, as well as the return of vehicles temporarily parked at
Randhurst Shopping Center before the Fall sale season begins.
PROJECT BUDGET SUMMARY INFORMATION
FY -1990-1991 $278,925
Arrow Const. Co. Bid $325,758 Includes $28,891 for sidewalk
removal and replacement that was
not in original project scope - need
for this item was revealed after
construction drawings were
prepared.
John F. Dixon - Page 2
June 14, 1990
Construction Inspection by $24,181 Required, as Inspection Services
Consultant cannot provide due to other
obligations.
Final payment to consultant $ 6,643
for design
TOTAL PROJECT COST $356,582
Project Shortfall $77,657
Transfer available $85,475
Surplus $ 7,818 Available for any additional
quantities and materials.
Staff would recommend that the bid presented by Arrow Construction Company be
approved and that the Village enter into an agreement with the firm for said work,
Payment on this contract will come from Account No. 23-062-06-8013. This account
currently has a balance of $278,925.35. Additional funding for this project is being
requested through a transfer of funds. If the transfer is approved, the total dollars available
for this project will be $364,400.35.
MES:hg
Approved:
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION PROVIDING THE TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN THE COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has entered its fourteenth year as an
entitlement community under the Federal Community Development Block Grant Program;
and
WHEREAS, in the past thirteen years the Village has used these funds to implement
various projects that address the community development and housing needs of its low- and
moderate -income and elderly residents, to reduce and prevent the occurrence of
deterioration in the central area of the Village, to increase accessibility for the handicapped,
plan neighborhood street improvements, and to address other community needs in
conformance with the objectives of the Community Development Block Grant Program;
and
WHEREAS, there is a need for additional funds for the Boxwood Drive Improvement
Project, which is part of the Village's Community Development Block Grant effort to reduce
neighborhood blight; and
WHEREAS, there are available funds in the Boxwood Advocacy Program, Single
Family Rehabilitation Rebate Program and in Administration; and
WHEREAS, the Department of Housing and Urban Development and the Village
have determined that a public hearing is not needed for this action.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS: -
SECTION ONE: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect hereby approve the following transfer of Community Development Block Grant
funds in the following amounts for a total transfer of $85,475,00.
From- Boxwood Advocacy Program: $4,475.00
To: Boxwood Street Improvements: $4,475.00
From: Housing Rehabilitation: $35,000.00
To: Boxwood Street Improvements: $35,000.00
From: Administration: $46,000.00
To: Boxwood Street Improvements: $46,000.00
SECTION TWO: The Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
hereby authorize the Village Manager to transfer said funds.
SECTION THREE: This resolution shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage and approval in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED this
APPROVED this
ATTEST:
.day of , 1990.
day of
1990.
ILGE CLERK — V
MAYOR
"-v'ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
DATE: JUNE 15, 1990
SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER #1 - BOXWOOD DRIVE CONSULTANT
MIDWEST CONSULTING ENGINEERS, INC.
Last year, the Village of Mount Prospect entered into an agreement with Midwest
Consulting Engineers, Inc. to perform design and engineering for the Boxwood Drive
improvement project. At that time, our Engineering Department had indicated that they
could supervise the construction of this project. This year, due to the large number of street
construction projects being performed by the Village, our Engineer lids indicated that he
does not have staff available for the Boxwood Drive project. As a result, staff asked
Midwest Consulting Engineers, Inc. to provide us with a proposal for performing said
engineering supervision. You will find a copy of this proposal attached to this memo. Their
proposal price is $24,181,00.
Staff has reviewed the proposal and finds it acceptable. We are particularly pleased to have
Midwest perform this work since they engineered the design of the project, prepared the
specifications for the bid packet and are obviously familiar with the project.
MMS:hg
Approved:
Midwest Consulting Engineers, Inc.
5151 North Harlem Avenue o Chicago, Illinois 60656 - (312) 792--1100 * Fax (312) 792-1143
June 11, 1990
Mr. Michael Sims
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson JUN 1990
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 14
E: c
Reference: Boxwood Drive Improvement Project
L�J
fttm*w ",
Dear Mr. Sims: &z
Outlined below is our Proposal To Furnish Construction Engineering
Services for the Boxwood Drive Improvement Project. Our proposal
addresses the scope of work, personnel, and compensation.
A. Scope of Services
Construction Observation (Construction Engineering)
1. The Engineer will provide a resident engineer, and
construction technician, as required by the contractor's
operations, to perform the work outlined in a) through
9) below. The Engineer's work procedures, inspection,
and documentation will be performed as if the roadway
improvements are MFT projects.
a) Provide continuous observation of the construction
work and the contractor's operations for compliance
with the plans and specifications.
b) Perform construction layout, including providing
line, grade, and removal limits.
C) Maintain a daily record (diary) of the contractor's
activities throughout construction, including
documenting sufficient information to permit
verification of the nature and cost of changes in
plans and authorized extra work.
d) Prepare and submit to the Village weekly reports on
the contractor's progress.
e)
f)
g)
Conduct weekly meetings with the contractor and all
interested parties to discuss the progress of the
project.
Revise contract drawings (tracings) to reflect "as -
constructed" conditions; the resultant record
drawings will be furnished to the Village.
Prepare and submit to the village all required
partial and final pay estimates, change orders,
records, and reports.
2. It is understood that the Engineer will retain an
independent consultant to provide materials testing
services during construction of the Project. The
Engineer will perform his services in conjunction with
those of the materials testing consultant, as required by
construction procedures and inspection requirements.
During construction of the Project, the Engineer shall
review test reports and verify that testing results
comply with the specifications. In the case of non-
complying test results, the Engineer will immediately
advise the construction contractor to take remedial
action.
The Engineer's inspection of concrete construction shall
include performing air entrainment measurements and slump
tests at the Project site and furnishing those results to
the materials testing consultant. The Engineer will form
concrete cylinders and mark and record the making of the
cylinders for pickup by the materials testing consultant.
The Engineer shall notify the material testing
consultant, in a timely manner, when concrete cylinders
are available for pick-up.
B. Personnel
We propose assignment of the following individuals to this
project:
Project Manager (Design) Philip T. Rabalais
Project manager (Const.) David C. Nissen
C. Compensation - Construction Services
The construction engineering fee for construction inspection
services on the streets to be reconstructed has been estimated
in the following manner and includes all of the work detailed
in the Request For Proposals:
-2-
- First, we prepared an estimate of the construction
quantities and formulated a "probable construction
schedule". The schedule is based on estimated daily
production rates for the estimated quantities. While the
schedule is not likely to exactly match that of the
successful contractor, it none -the -less is very
representative of what it will take to complete
construction.
- Second, with the "probable schedule" as a basis, we have
established the staffing and manhours per week that will be
necessary to provide inspection.
The fee for full-time inspection services on the streets to be
reconstructed is estimated to be $24,181.00, developed as
follows:
Estimated Construction Working Days = 30 Days
Estimated Calendar Time Required = 8 Weeks
Manhours Required:
Resident Engineer
(45 hr/wk x 8-1/2 weeks) = 382
Construction Technician
(30 hrs/wk x 2 weeks) = 60
Project Admin/Mgt = 28
Total: 470 manhours
- construction Services
Full-time inspection services
Fee -
Labor 470 hrs ($16.95 ave. hrly) (2.65) $21,111
Vehicle - 8 wks (5.5 days/wk) ($30.00) 1,320
Material Testing 1,750
Total: $24,181
-3-
We thank you for the opportunity to submit our proposal and look
forward to continuing our excellent working relationship with the
Village on these improvements.
PTR: j1
MCE003/10
Very truly yours,
MIDWEST CONSULTIN ENGINEERS, INC.
Phillip T. Rabalais
-4-
CAF/
6/14/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Schedule III of Article XX entitled "One -Way
Streets" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding in proper
alphabetical sequence "Boxwood Dr. - Northerly - Btw. Wheeling
Rd. & Wheeling Rd."; so that hereinafter Section 18.2003 shall
include the following:
Name of Direction of
Street Traffic Movement Description
Boxwood Dr. Northerly Btw. Wheeling Rd. &
Wheeling Rd. 11
SECTION TWO: That Schedule IV of Article XX entitled "Stop and
Yield Signs" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by deleting
therefrom "Boxwood Dr. S. - Eastbound - Wheeling Road".
SECTION THREE• That Schedule V of Article XX entitled "No
Stopping, Standing or Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further
amended by deleting therefrom "Boxwood Dr. - East - The first
20 ft. south of Dogwood In."
SECTION OUR: That Schedule V of Article XX entitled "No
Stopping, Standing or Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the
Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further
amended by deleting therefrom "Boxwood Dr. - East - The first
20 ft. north of Dogwood In."
SECTION FIVE: That Schedule VI of Article XX entitled "No Parking
Any Time" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding in proper
alphabetic sequence "Boxwood Dr. - East - Btw. Wheeling Rd. &
Wheeling Rd."; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2005 shall
include the following:
Name of Side of
Street Street Description
Boxwood Dr. Inner Section Entire Jurisdiction
SECTION SIX:. That this ordinance shall be in full force and
N
Chapter 18
Boxwood
Page 2 of 2
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form the manner provide by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
It
Gerald L. Farley
village President
. 1990
VI�LAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: VILLAGE MANAGER JOHN F. DIXON
FROM: DEPUTY CHIEF, DEL ULREICH 1P -A
DATE: JUNE 15, 1990
SUBJECT: AMBULANCE RE CHASSIS
Sealed bids were at lO:OO a.m. on June 13, I998 for the proposed
Purchase of a new ambulance chassis and the remount of an existing
patient compartment module.
Invitations to bid were sent to four emergency equipment builders.
Only one company submitted a proposal. Their bid is represented be7mv'
sM[KG 4 STAR $ 37"523
Funds have been designated for this purpose in the 1990/91 budget under
the account number 51-077-93-8101 appearing on page 212.
1 do recommend the approval of this bid from EMERG A STAR.
Del Dlreich
Deputy Fire Chief
14
Customer Mount Prospect Fire Department Date 6/11/90
PROPOSAL - ORDER
Quantity Description Price
1 1990 Ford Chassis per enclosed quotation $18,937.00
1 Remount and Refurbish your
per enclosed quotation. $18,586.00
Trade-in of old chassis included.
Final Price Excluding all applicable taxes. $37,523.00
F.O.B. St. Louis, MO.
TERMS: See Remount and Chassis quotation for terms and payment requirements
DELIVERY: 4D-.,_7_Qcalendar days after receipt of initial payments,
signed order, chassis, and customer supplied equipment,.
All quotations honored for 30 days unless otherwise noted.
Total price excludes all applicable taxes unless otherwise noted.
_M1934at__P.r0_a I - e De agrees to purchase the items and services above
subject to terms and conditions herein.
FOR*-Zaunt_2x&w.peq� Fire De t. Date
FOR EMERGE -A -STAR Date
4-�
4348 CLAYTON AVENUE 0 ST LOUIS, MISSOURI 63110 - 314 / 535-8750