HomeMy WebLinkAbout3744_001Next Ordinance No. 4183
Next Resolution No. 21-90
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U B I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
ir
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
II. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and I May 15, 1990
Tuesday
May 15, 1990
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Parley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo FloroS
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem.
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Corcoran
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, May 1, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
V1. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. Administer Oath of Office:
Police Officer Recruit Donna Woodside and
Police officer Ted Adamczyk upon his promotion to Sergeant
B. Presentation: Retirement of Sgt. Patrick Hallihan,
following 23-1/2 years with the Mount Prospect
Police Department
C. Presentation: Cook County Health Department
D. Request from Mount Prospect Lions Club to
waive fees and out of pocket expenses
involved with conducting their annual
Village Fair, June 30 thru July 4, 1990
at Melas Park.
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATIONS:
1. Buckle Up America Week, May 21 - 28, 1990
2. Public Works Week, May 14 - 19, 1990
3. Historical Society Day, May 31, 1990
4. Peace Officers' Memorial Week, May 14 - 19, 1990
B. Consider for relief from regulations governing
shrubs in right-of-way.
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 13.124.A
OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance increases the fine that can be
assessed by the Liquor commissioner for a
violation and creates a provision to reimburse
the Village for costs incurred for a hearing. (Exhibit A)
D. Appointments
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. ZBA 5-Z-90, 6 -SU -90, 7-V-90, 400 East Rand Road
1. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP OF
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This ordinance amends the Comprehensive Plan
to reflect multi -family use, instead of
commercial. The Plan Commission recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
(Exhibit B)
2. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
MODIFICATION FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
(CHAPTER 16) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This ordinance grants a modification
from the Development Code to permit a
detention basin closer to the buildings than
the permitted 75 feet. The Plan Commission
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0.
(Exhibit C)
3. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ORCHARD FIELD
TOWNHOMES
This Ordinance rezones the subject property
from R-1 (Single -Family) to R-3 (Multi -family
Residential) to permit a townhouse
development. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 7-0.
(Exhibit D)
4. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL
USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
ORCHARD FIELD TOWNHOMES
This Ordinance grants a Special Use in the
nature of a Planned Unit Development in order
to construct 24 townhomes (resulting in 8.8
dwelling units per acre). This ordinance also
grants a variation to allow a 10 foot setback
from the cul de sac bulb, instead of the
required 20 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting this request
by a vote of 7-0.
(Exhibit E)
5. Orchard Field Plat of Subdivision
B. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IV
OF CHAPTER 10 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amends the regulations governing
revocation or denial of a business license as
well as the hearing process for such action.
(Exhibit F)
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance establishes regulations governing
the sale of tobacco to minors.
(Exhibit G)
D. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE III
OF CHAPTER 19 ENTITLED "HEALTH REGULATIONS" OF
THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance establishes regulations against
creating a hazard to health and property as a
result of attracting animals, birds and insects.
(Exhibit H)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. ZBA 24-V-90, 1631 Oneida Lane
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a service walk 51 411 wide, instead of the permitted
31. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this variation by a vote of 5-0.
B.
ZBA 26-V-90, 2234 West Lincoln Street
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow a
circular driveway, resulting in 2 driveways on
the lot and to allow a driveway width of 32 feet.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 5-0.
C.
ZBA 28-Z-90, 29 -SU -90, 30-V-90. 720 E. Rand Road
The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from B-3 to
B-4 and a Special Use to permit a drive-thru
restaurant 1,629 in size, and variations to allow
* 13.51 front yard, instead of the required 301;
* 31 side yard, instead of the required 101; a
51 rear yard instead of the required 201; and to
waive the required 121 x 351 loading space. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
the request for rezoning and variations by a
vote of 6-0 and to grant the special use by a
vote of 5-1.
D.
Acknowledge receipt of annual Plan Commission
Fair Housing Report
E.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE
DISPOSAL OF SURPLUS PROPERTY OWNED BY THE
VILLAGE.
These miscellaneous items will be auctioned
off during the Public Works Open House on
Saturday, May 19, 1990
(Exhibit J)
F.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A
DETERMINATION OF THE PREVAILING WAGE RATE
This Ordinance, required by the State of
Illinois, establishes the wage rates that
contractors must pay their employees when
performing projects for the Village.
(Exhibit K)
G.
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING CLOSURE OF A STATE
ROADWAY IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A PARADE
This Resolution, required by IDOT, requests
permission to close a portion of Central -
Road in order to conduct the July 4th Parade.
(Exhibit L)
H.
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE DIMENSION WORKS,
INC. MAKING APPLICATION FOR COOK COUNTY
CLASS 6b TAX EXEMPTION
This business is considering locating within
the Lake Center Plaza Industrial Park.
(Exhibit M)
X. VILLAGE MRNAGEn'S REPORT
A. Bids:
1. Catch Basin and inlet cleaning
2. One Lawn Tractor/Mower/Optional Snowblower
3. Handicap Access, Historical Museum
4. Reconstruction Chicago/Northwestern
parking lot
B. Request for field change at Evergreen Woods,
2000 West Golf Road, to permit a 61 fence
between the townhomes and shopping center to
the west.
C. A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT FOR AUTOMATIC
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS RESPONSE (Exhibit N)
D. Melas Park Detention/Storm Water Improvement
E. Authorization to pay GFE Fire Equipment
F. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION - Litigation
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MAY 1, 1990
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call: Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran (arrived late)
Trustee Leo Floras
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Arthur.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved APPROVE
to approve the minutes of the regular meeting MINUTES
of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held April 17, 1990.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
moved to approve the following list of
bills:
General Fund
$ 455,664
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
165
Community Development Block Grant Fund
23,666
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
19,127
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
572,294
Parking System Revenue Fund
2,061
Risk Management Fund
77,825
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
4,836
Special Service Area Const. #5
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
345
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
-
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
-
Debt Service Funds
6,583
Flexcomp Trust Fund
-
Escrow Deposit Fund
10,591
Police Pension Fund
38,815
Firemen's Pension Fund
43,091
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,254,718
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem
Nays: Wattenberg
Motion carried,..,
Trustee Corcoran arrived at this point in the meeting.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
The following members of the Fire Department were
presented Certificates of Appreciation for various
acts of heroism over and above the normal line of duty:
Lt. Keith Destree
Firefighter John Bagby
Firefighter/Paramedic Doug Lubash
APPROVE BILLS
Firefighter/Paramedic Don Wisniewski
Firefighter/Paramedic Terry Corr
Firefighter/Paramedic James Flory
Firefighter/Paramedic Don Burger
Firefighter/Paramedic Matt Canning
Firefighter Thomas Reynolds
SENIOR A resident invited the Board to attend "Senior
CELEBRATION Celebration" week at Randhurst where he was going to
sing Italian songs.
HOTEL: RAND & Two residents expressed their concern relative to the
HILL possibility of a hotel chain being invited to construct
a hotel on Rand Road at Hill Street. They stated that
the Village should inform the residents when
considering such a proposal and that they would object
to such a development adjacent to single family
residences.
MELAS PARK George Clowes expressed his interest in the Village and
Park Districts reaching an agreement on the design and
uses of Melas Park. Mr. Clowes presented a plan he had
prepared. Mayor Farley asked if Mr. Clowes would
present this plan to the Mount Prospect Park District
and distribute it to the .Village Board for
consideration at a later date.
SHRUBS IN Several residents requested a follow up to their
RIGHT-OF-WAY appearance at the March 6, 1990 meeting of the Village
Board where they asked for relief from the requirement
of Public Works to remove specified shrubs. It was
noted that the shrubs at 905 Westgate were installed
12 years ago, following verbal approval of the Building
Department Director, and removing these 38 evergreens
would cost $3,600 and the landscaper couldn't guarantee
the shrubs would survive the move.
Other residents, listed below, stated they too had
received notification that they must move, trim or
remove certain plantings, including a 25 foot high blue
spruce, by May 15th or the Village would take action,
and that they also asked for relief from this
regulation.
Joseph Baltasi
Don Rabb, 802 Barberry
Ann Marie Rabb, 802 Barberry
Mr. Merrill, 1304 Ironwood
Mrs. Darley, 1003 Newberry
Resident, 1310 Ironwood
Resident, 1311 Ironwood
Mayor Farley stated that when safety is a factor, the
safety of residents must come first. He also stated
that the Board members would take a look at the
specific areas and directed staff not to take any
action until the Board has discussed their findings.
This matter will be discussed at the May 15th meeting.
MAYOR'S "PORT
PROCLAMATIONS: Mayor Farley made the following proclamations:
CHILDRENS FIRE Childrens Fire Safety Festival, May 7 - 11, 1990
SAFETY FESTIVAL at Randhurst Shopping Center
CLERK'S WEEK Municipal Clerk's Week, May 6 - 12, 1990
TEACHER'S WEEK Teacher's Appreciation Week, May 6 - 12, 1990
OPERATION Illinois Operation Lifesaver Awareness Day,
LIFESAVER May 15, 1990
Page 2 - May 1, 1990
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that AMEND CH.13
would authorize the creation of a Class "W" liquor
license for Taqueria Fiesta Restaurant,
1802 South Elmhurst Road.
TAQUERIA
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved FIESTA
to waive the rule requiring 2 readings of an Ordinance. 1802 S. ELMHUFST
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van "Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
ORD.NO. 4176
for passage of Ordinance No. 4176
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
AMEND CH.13
delete one Class "W" liquor license, issued to Sizzlers
DELETE "W"
Steak House, 110 East Rand Road. This establishment
has been sold and the new owners will apply for a
liquor license at a future date.
TrusteeVan Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
SIZZLERS
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
STEAK HOUSE
110 E. RAND RD.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
ORD.NO. 4177
for passage of Ordinance No. 4177
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
AMEND CH.13
would delete one Class "R" liquor license, issued
DELETE "R11
to the Golden Nugget,.1800 South Elmhurst Road.,
This business has been sold and the new owners will
GOLDEN
apply for a license at a later date.
NUGGET
1800 ELMHURST
Trusi.ee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busie, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for ORD.NO. 4178
Page 3 - May 1, 1990
passage of Ordinance No. 4178
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays:,None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 13
An Ordinance was
presented
for first reading that
DELETE 'IS"
would delete one
Class 'IS"
liquor license, issued
CHARLIE CLUB
to Charlie Club,
501 Midway
Drive. This
501 MIDWAY DR.
establishment has chosen
not to sell alcoholic
beverages.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
waive the rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Mays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4179 Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4179
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Kays: None
Motion carried.
O'NEILS A request was presented by the new owners of O'Neils,
OWNERSHIP CHANGE: 303 East Kensington Road, to allow them to continue
WILD STALLION operation under the existing Class 'IS" liquor license.
CAFE It was stated by the new owner that it is their hope
303 E.KENSINGTON to establish a family type operation serving steaks
and sea food.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to authorize the Wild Stallion Cafe, 303 East
Kensington Road, to continue doing business under the
existing Class 'IS" liquor license issued to that
address.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH. 13 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
RECOUP HEARING amend Chapter 13 by increasing the fine that can
COSTS be assessed for a violation of the regulations
governing Alcoholic Beverage. This Ordinance also
establishes a provision to reimburse the Village for
costs incurred as a result of a hearing as a result of
a violation of Chapter 13.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading
on May 15th.
APPOINTMENTS Mayor Farley presented the following recommendation
I
Page 4 - May 1, 1990
for reappointments to Commissions or Boards:
Business Development and Redevelopment:
John Eilering, term to expire May, 1994
Finance Commission:
Richard Bachhuber, term to expire May, 1994
safety Commission:
Andrew Mitchell, term to expire May, 1994
Sign Review Board:`
Warren Kostak, term to expire May, 1992
Thomas Borrelli, term to expire, May, 1992
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Mayor and
reappoint those people listed to the respective Commissions.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
OLD BUSINESS
Pate Subdivision, Wildwood Lane
An Ordinance, continued from previous meetings,
was presented for second reading that would
authorize execution of a recapture agreement
relative to the development of property located
at the west end of Wildwood Lane.
Trustee Corcoran noted that there were several
areas in the Ordinance that were unclear he
suggested the attorney for the Petitioner and the
Village Attorney draft an Ordinance and agreement
acceptable to all concerned.
Ed Labuz stated that since he would be affected
by this Recapture he would like to have an opportunity
to review the final draft, however he will be out of
town until the end of May.
Mayor Farley stated that this Ordinance will be
presented for final reading on June 5th.
Members of the Homeowners Association Board and
residents of that Association asked the Board to grant
a field change to permit fences.
It was noted that there are 47 units in this
Association, located in the 1200 block of Wheeling
Road and it is their intention to install chain
link fences, approximately 3-1/2 feet in height.
The purpose of the fences is to promote pride in
ownership, since these units were recently converted
from apartments to individually owned townhomes.
Trustee Van Geem expressed his reservations about
granting this request, even though 50% of the unit
owners were either present at the meeting or signed
a petition in favor of this requdst. Trustee Van
Geem stated that his concern was that if the Board
granted this field change some homeowners may not
want the fences and would blame the Village.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
Page 5 - May 1, 1990
PATE
SUBDIVISION
EUCLID LAKE
VILLAS: FIELD -
CHANGE -
FENCES
grant the field change to Euclid Lake Villas and permit
chain link fences.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: Van Geem
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur requested clarification as to whether
the Euclid Lake Villas is a Planned Unit Development,
which provides for the granting of a field change,
noting that if the subject property isn't a PUD he
doesn't understand why the Board is considering a field
change.
CABLE TV A Resolution was presented that would establish
HEARING a hearing procedure for violations of the franchise
PROCEDURES FOR agreement by a cable television franchise operator.
VIOLATIONS This Resolution was continued from the April 17th
meeting in order to give TCI an opportunity to
review it.
RES.NO. 19-90 Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 19-90
A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A HEARING PROCEDURE
FOR VIOLATION OF FRANCHISE AGREEMENT PERTAINING
TO CABLE TELEVISION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse left the meeting for a brief time at
this point in the meeting.
ZBA 17 -SU -90 ZBA 17 -SU -90, 2200 South Busse Road
2200 S.BUSSE RD An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would repeal Ordinance No. 3656 and grant a Special
use in the nature of a Planned Unit Development to
permit a light industrial complex with 5 units. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0.
ORD.NO. 4180 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4180
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 3656 AND
GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Busse returned to the meeting at this point.
ZBA 21-V-90 ZBA 21-V-90, 301 East Rand Road
301 E. RAND RD An Ordinance wad presented for second reading that
would grant variations to allow a 7,200 square foot
building to house no more than 5 tenants. This
Ordinance also grants a front yard building setback of
18 feet, instead of the required 30 feet along Highland
Avenue; a 10 foot rear yard building setback instead
of the required 20 feet; a zero foot setback instead
of the required 20 feet when adjacent to residential
Page 6 - May 1, 1990
property and 30 feet from a right-of-way; and
ZBA 5-Z-90
to waive the requirement for a 12' x 35' loading
ZBA 6 -SU -90
dock. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended denying
ZBA 7-V-90
these requests by a vote of 2-3.
400 E . RAND RD
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
ORD.NO. 4181
for passage of Ordinance No. 4181
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 301 EAST RAND ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 22-V-90, 2100 South Elmhurst Road
ZBA 22-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
2100 ELMHURST
would grant variations to permit a parking lot and
driveway aisle setback of zero feet instead of the
required 30 feet along Midway Drive and to allow a
maximum building height of 35' 611, excluding the
light well, instead of the permitted 30 feet. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 5-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
ORD.NO.4182
for passage of Ordinance No. 4182
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 2100 S. ELMHURST ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 5-Z-90, 6 -SU -90, 7-V-90, 400 East Rand Road
ZBA 5-Z-90
The following Ordinances were presented for first
ZBA 6 -SU -90
readings:
ZBA 7-V-90
400 E . RAND RD
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE MAP OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A MODIFICATION
FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16)
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
AN ORDINANCE REZONING CERTAIN PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS ORCHARD FIELD TOWNHOMES
(400 EAST RAND ROAD)
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN
THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ORCHARD
FIELD TOWNHOMES (400 EAST RAND ROAD)
These Ordinances,wi.11 he presented May i5 for second
readings.
NEW BUSINESS AMEND CH.10
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that HEARING
would establish procedures for a hearing process by the PROCEDURE:
Village President when a violation of the regulations SALE OF
governing selling tobacco to minors has occurred. TOBACCO TO
MINORS
Page 7 - May 1, 1990
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BIDS: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
following bids:
ASBESTOS The following bids were received for the removal
REMOVAL: of asbestos from the Senior Citizen Center:
SENIOR CENTER
Bidder Amount
JVI $20,757
American Disposal, Inc. $24,820
M & 0 Abatement Company $26,050
MARS, Inc. $26,570
Gardean Environmental Co. $37,000
''Brennan's Peb & Associates $39,770
All American Asbestos Abatement $49,762
L. J. Michaels, Ltd. $53,965
JVI Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved t+
concur with the recommendation of the administration
Page 8 - May 1, 1990
It was determined that the Village President would be
the appropriate person to conduct a hearing if a
violation occurs and the violator requests a hearing.
This ordinance will be presented May 15th for second
reading.
AMEND CH. 11
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
establishes regulations prohibiting the sale of
tobacco to minors.
SALE OF TOBACCO
TO MINORS
Trustee Van Geem suggested the prohibition governing
PROHIBITED
possession of tobacco products by a minor be
deleted, noting that possession and purchase are not one
in the same. Trustee Van Geem also suggested that the
Village Manager inform High School District 214 about
the proposed ordinance and invite their input.
Trustee Wattenberg asked that the Police Department
comment on this proposed ordinance.
An example was given where a minor may be driving his
parents car and their cigarettes may be in the vehicle
and the enforcement officer would have to determine
whether the minor was indeed in possession of those
cigarettes.
There support to delete 'possession' from the
'wasn't
other members of the Board.
This Ordinance will be presented May 15th for
second reading.
AMEND CH. 19
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
ATTRACTING
establishes regulations against anyone creating a
EXCESS OF BIRDS
hazard to health and/or property as a result of
ANIMALS,INSECTS
attracting animals, birds and/or insects.
PROHIBITED
This Ordinance will be presented May 15th for
second reading.
Trustee Wattenberg left the meeting briefly at
this point in the meeting.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BIDS: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
following bids:
ASBESTOS The following bids were received for the removal
REMOVAL: of asbestos from the Senior Citizen Center:
SENIOR CENTER
Bidder Amount
JVI $20,757
American Disposal, Inc. $24,820
M & 0 Abatement Company $26,050
MARS, Inc. $26,570
Gardean Environmental Co. $37,000
''Brennan's Peb & Associates $39,770
All American Asbestos Abatement $49,762
L. J. Michaels, Ltd. $53,965
JVI Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved t+
concur with the recommendation of the administration
Page 8 - May 1, 1990
and accept the low bid submitted by JVI in the
amount of $20,757 for the removal of asbestos
in the Senior Citizen Center.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros
Nays: Van Geem
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the purchase TWO COMPACT
of two (2) compact stations wagons for the Public STATION
Works Department: WAGONS
Bidder Model Amount
Lattof Chevrolet, Inc. Cavalier $18,706.60
Tom Todd Chevrolet Cavalier $18,980.60
Hoskins Chevrolet Cavalier $19,280.00
Woodfield Ford Escort $19,398.00 -
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved LATTOF
to concur with the recommendation of the administration CHEVROLET
and accept the bid submitted by Lattof Chevrolet for
the purchase of two (2) Cavalier station wagons in an
amount not to exceed $18,706.60.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the purchase of 3/4 TON
of one (1) 3/4, two wheel drive, pick up truck: PICK UP
TRUCK
Bidder Model Amount
Lattof Chevrolet CC20903-E-63-C6P $13,218.05
Tom Todd Chevrolet C2500 2WD HD $13,351.63
Woodfield Ford F250 HD $13,529.00
GMC,Chicago Truck Center TC20903 $13,670.16
Elmhurst Ford F250 $13,880.00
Northwest Ford Truck Ctr. F250 HD $14,900.00
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to LATTOF
concur with the recommendation of the administration CHEVROLET
and accept the low bid submitted by Lattof Chevrolet
for the purchase one one (1) 3/4 ton, two wheel drive,
pick up truck in an amount not to exceed $13,218.05.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: Pone
Motion carried.
The following bids were received for the purchase of ONE TON
of one (1) one ton truck cab/chassis: TRUCK
Bidder Model Amount CAB/CHASSIS
Lattof Chevrolet CC31003-2WD $12,497.67
Tom Todd Chevrolet C3500-2WD-HD $12,898.12
Page 9 - May 1, 1990
Page 10 - May 1, 1990
Bidder Model Amount
GMC Chicago Truck Center TC31003 $13,079.19
Elmhurst Ford F350 $13,700.00
Northwest Ford Truck Center F350 $14,950.00
Woodfield Ford Sales, Inc. F350 $16,899.00
LATTOF
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran; moved to
CHEVROLET
concur with the recommendation of the administration
and accept the low bid submitted by Lattof Chevrolet
for one (1) one-ton truck cab/chassis in an amount not
to exceed $12,497.67
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Wattenberg returned to the meeting at this
point.
PARKWAY
The following bids were received for parkway
RESTORATION
restoration:
Bidder %q_Xar& Total
Classic Landscape Ltd. $ 2.50 $ 2,325.00
Koch and Son $10.44 $ 9,657.00
Ingram Enterprises $19.98 $18,546.00
It was noted that Classic Landscape did not comply with
the bid specifications, as well as not having a bid
bond attached.
KOCH & SON
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to concur with the recommendation and reject the bid
submitted by Classic Landscape, since it did not meet
specifications, and accept the bid submitted by Koch
and Son in an amount not to exceed the $15, 000 budgeted
for this project.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
CATCH BASIN/
The following bids were received for the repair of
INLET REPAIR
catch basins and inlets:
Bidder Amount
Artley Paving $28,430
Suburban Construction $34,950
Abboreno $35,122
Pontarelli $42,438
Martam $44,720
ARTLEY PAVING
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
moved to concur with the recommendation of the
administration and accept the low bid submitted by
Page 10 - May 1, 1990
Artley Paving in the amount not to exceed the
budgeted amount of $30,000 for the repair of
catch basins and inlets.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Dixon presented a proposal from RJN Environmental RATE STUDY:
Associates, Inc. to conduct the rate study for flood FLOOD CONTROL
control user charge. This matter had been discussed
in depth at the Committee of the Whole meeting on
April 24th. The cost for the proposed study, with
options, totals $19,000, and will take approximately
12 weeks to complete.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
RJN
to accept,the proposal submitted by RJN Environmental
ENVIRONMENTAL
Associates, Inc. in the amount of $19,000 to conduct
ASSOC. INC.
the rate study for flood control user charge.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented authorizing an inter-
I N T E R -
governmental agreement, cooperating with the
GOVERNMENTAL
Metropolitan and Northeastern Drug Enforcement
DRUG
Agency.
ENFORCEMENT
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur,
RES.NO. 20-90
moved for passage of Resolution No. 20-90
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Village Manager Dixon noted that Browning Ferris
BRUSH PICK
Industries (BFI) and the Director of Public Works
WEEKLY
have agreed that regular pick up of yard waste, for
items too big to place in the special Village bags,
will be done on a weekly basis, rather than the
monthly pick up originally scheduled.
Mr. Dixon noted that Paul Bednar, village Planner,
PAUL BEDNAR,
has accepted a position with a landscape firm and
PLANNER
will be leaving the Village May 11th.
RESIGNED
The village manager announced that the parking study PARKING
has been completed and is being distributed to the STUDY
Library Board and First Chicago Bank of Mount Prospect
for their review, after which time the study will be
presented at a committee of the Whole meeting for
Board discussion.
Since the asbestos removal projec"t in the Senior REMOVE
Center will begin May 7th, the Committee of the Whole ASBESTOS
meeting scheduled for May 8th is cancelled. PROJECT
Page 11 - May 1, 1990
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
HONORARY Trustee Van Geem announced the birth of his nephew,
CITIZENS Eric James Van Geem, born May 1, 1990 and weighing
8 lbs. 14 oz. Mayor Farley also announced the birth
of his grandson Benjamin Robert Farley, born April 28,
1990.
The title of Honorary Citizens of Mount Prospect were
conferred upon Eric James Van Geem and Robert Farley
by acclamation.
ADJOURN ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 10:50 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 12 - May 1, 1990
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1985
Downtown Redev Const Fund 1987
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension F
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
May 10, 1990
Cash & Invest
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest
Balance
5/01/90 through
Per Attached Journal
Balance
5101/90
5110190
List of Bills Entry
5110/90
$4,101,877
$141,383
$611,411
3,631,849
596,242
12,327
10,771
597,798
8,781
-
7,760
1,021
80,866
8,097
56,135
32,828
3,281,271
145,051
87,154
3,339,168
254,707
4,670
3,814
255,563
1,338,987
10,739
28,135
1,321,491
766,842
785
822
766,805
209,752
2,096
-
211,848
1,027,140
6,754
-
1,033,8 4_
3,576
4,400
7,170
806
1,433,612
18,932
1,546
1,450,998
14,528,155
11,897
-
14,540,052
16,391,083
10,768
-
16,401,851
263,231
-
2,167
261,064
$44.286._022 $377J99, 816 885
RNEMMOMM
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
A-1 TIME RECORDER CO. INC.
AA SWIFT PRINT* INC.
ABLE FIRE SAFETY EQUIP
ALDRIDGE ELECTRICS INC.
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
AMOCO OIL COMPANY
ANALYTICAL LAB* FUR ENVIR.EXC.
ANDERSON ELEVATOR CO.
ANSUL FIRE PROTECTION
AQUA SAFETY EQUIPMENT* INC.
B E H INDUSTRIES
BADGER METER INC
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
BELING CONSULTANTS: INC.
BLAIR BUSINESS SERVICES9 INC.
BROOKFIELD
BROWNING FERRIS INDUSTRIES
BUSSE HARDWARE
BUSSE CAR WASH* INC.
BUSSES FLOWERS E GIFTS
DON CARRILLO
CENTRAL CONTINENTAL BAKERY
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CHICAGO E NORTHWESTERN TRANS C
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE I
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/10/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
TIME CARDS
$84.45
584.45
NEWSLETTER PRINTING
$29935.30
$29935.30
HYDROCARBON EMULSIFIER
$!*115.00
$I:115.00
TRAFFIC SIGNAL MTCE
SI:968.75
REPAIR TRAFFIC SIGNAL
$39129.00
%59097.75
COLD PATCH
S1:387.40
Siv387.4�
PUBLICATION
525.00
$25.00
708-370-8400
1379.04
1379.04
GASOLINE
$22.39
$22.39
SERVICES RENDERED
529600.00
S2*600.00
MTCE AGREEMENT
$140.00
$140.00
CHEMICAL APPLICATORS
$19332.51
519332.51
SUPPLIES
$474.24
5474.24
SUPPLIES
$13.90
BLUEPRINTS
$94.90
SUPPLIES
$13.11
$121.91
CREDIT
$517.50-
EQUIP14ENT
1536.00
$18.50
CARTRIDGES
$38.50
CARTRIDGES
5122.50
CHEMICALS
$39516.00
$39677.00
SERVICES RENDERED
539903.27
S3*903.27
TEMP HELP-BRANDT
$306.90
TEMP HELP-BRANDT
$427.80
$734.70
MED CLAIMS THRU 5!3!90
!129260.26
5129260.26*
EXTRA BOXES -LAWN WASTE
348.00
$48.00
MISC HOWARE SUPPLIES
$41.38
$41.38
WASHES -APRIL 90
$280.00
5280.00
FLOWERS-NEITZE
$53.00
FLORAL ARRANGEMENTS
$274.00
$327.00
REFUND TRANSFER TAX
5155.00
$155.00
DONUTS FOR CLASS
$81*00
$81.00
SUPPLIES
539452.00
539452.00
VACUUM E HOSE
$200.00
VACUUM E HOSE
$540.00
$740.00
LAND LEASE
$2*232.25
$29232.25
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/10190
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
CHICAGO CASTER AND EQUIPMENT C
SUPPLIES
$66.90
$66.90
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE CO.
PLAT COPY
$18.00
$18.00
CITIBANK• N.A.
PMT OF INSURANCE CLAIMS
$1,527.00
$19527.00#
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
WATER SERVICE
$62.76
$62.76
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
RMT-P/R 51`3190
3224.25
$224.25*
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
SERVICE-'LARCH 90
659673+6Z
BFBO-JT-17006
$293.28
3'59966.9(
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
SERVICE MARCH 90
$9*037.42
BH66-JT-0498-A
$21.41
BH67-JT-1310-A
$59.87
BGZI-JT-1838-A
$50.82
BA77-JT-2404-A
$8.57
BH66-JT- 37IG-A
38.57
BH67-JT-3858-8
$22.00
SH66-JT- 5262-A
$148.21
BH66-JT-5266-C
$134.03
BH66-JT-5422-A
$8.57
B872-JT-5608-0
5308.50
SH68-JT-7498-A
SZi.4i
$9x829.38
W. S. DARLEY COMPANY
SUPPLIES
$690:00
$690x00
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 5-3-90
$350*060.41
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING 5-3-90
$1:366.65
PATROtt PERIOD ENDING 5-3-90
3456.16
PAVROLL PERIOD ENDING 5-3-90
$359Z30.23
$387#113.45
CORTEZ DIXON
BD MIG PROD CREW
$25.00
$2'5.00
DONOHUE E ASSOCIATES9 INC.
SERVICES RENDERED
3214?2.23
SERVICES RENDERED
329318.34
SERVICES RENDERED
54*235.03
$9x025.60
EtEK-TEK9 INC.
SUPPLIES
$77.13
DIGITIZER
$579.38
3656.51
ELEK- TEK9 INC.
SUPPLIES
$17.14
$17.14
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
REPORT FORMS
$93.00
$93.00
FIRST NAT*L BANK OF MT. PROS.
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5/3
$99624.78
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5j3
$104.55
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 513
$34.90
DUE TO FED DFP PAY 513
$2#695.11
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/10/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
DUE TO FED DEP PAY 5/3
$805:22
$13,264.56*
FLEXCOMP DISBURSEMENTS
MEDICAL BENEFIT REIMS
$6x054.92
DEPENDENT CARE REIMS
SI,I15.00
17,169.92*
FORBES INCORPORATED
MAINTENANCE
$425.00
$425.00
FOREST TREE SERVICE• INC.
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$2,986.80
E2t986.80
FRANC R. FULTON
WATER BILL REFUND
3192.02
WATER BILL REFUND
$18.48
S210*50
GFE, INC
SUPPLIES
514#714.00
AUTO PARTS
$507.40
$15*221.40
GLASS* HILL• DALLMEYER E ROTHt
SERVICES RENDERED -MARCH 90
$49174.70
54,174.70
MARY L. GORSE
REFUNO FINAL WATER BILL
$31.92
REFUND FINAL MATER BILL
$3.08
635.00
GOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL TESTING
EXAMINATIONS
$10.800.00
$10,800.00
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
UNIFORM- JIUMPSUIT
152.25
TRAFFIC VESTS
$131.40
$183.05
GREELEY AND HANSEN
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$49690.20
ENGINEERING SERVICES
33,456.26
18,146.46
LAWRENCE W. GREGOIRE
REFUND FINAL BILL
$2.28
REFUND FINAL BILL
5.22
$2.50
.LAMES E. GUENTHER
REIMS -SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$50.00
H R HART PHOTO
FILM PROCESSING APRIL 90
$152.39
5152.39
H -8--:X WATER METER SERVICE
MATER METER MATERIALS
$90.75
WATER METER EXCHANGES
$68.76
WATER METER EXCHANGES
$309.42
WATER METER LABOR
$33.35
WATER METER EXCHAIR;ES
$34.38
;536.66
PATRICK L. HALLIHAN
REFUND HLTH CONT MAY 90
$31.85
331.85
GEORGE ,1. HAMMES
SERVICE RENDERED -APRIL
$719.00
3719.00
HENRICKSEN
EQUIPMENT
$637.00
FURNITLK E
$229.29
FURNITURE
$158.71
31:025.00
EDWARD MINES LUMBER CO.
SUPPLIES
$17.62
$17.62
TONY HUEMANN
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.00
IDENTITY
SWEATERS
$168.99
$168.99
ILLINOIS BUSINESS SYSTEMS9 INC
SERVICE COPIER
$75.00
175.00
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT
EMPLOYEE SHARE IMRF-APRIL
Slit -P141.48
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 4
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5110190
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
EMPLOYER SHARE IMRF-APRIL
$32*368.27
$46,9509.75*
JOAN•S TROPHY E PLAQUE CO.
PLAQUE
$34.58
134.58
SONES* WARE E GRENARD
SERVICES RENDERED
$550.00
$550.00
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT-PIR 5/3
$254.00
$254.00*
KALE UNIFORMS
CLOTHING
$186.35
CLOTHING
$106.45
SHIRTS-ALM
$65.85
$358.6°
KASPER CONSTRUCTION CO.
CDBG-105 N HORNER
$842.50
$842.50
JOHN KEANE
TALK OF THE TOWN CREW
$10400
$10.00
JERARD M. KELLY
OVERPMT FLOOD LOAN
$67.67
$67.67*
CHARLES KLEHM E SON NURSERY
TREES
$900.00
TREES
$29925.00
TREES
$450.00
TREE
$135.00
TREES
$2.631.00
TREE
$225.00
37.266.00
LEIDER GREENHOUSE - PRAIRIE VI
EASTER LILIES
$278.24
$278.24
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MISC SUPPLIES
$51.86
MISC SUPPLIES
$7.02
MISC SUPPLIES
$19.55
MISC SUP Pt IES
$46.85
MISC SUPPLIES
$20.20
MISC SUPPLIES
$136.35
MISC SUPPLIES
$19.55
MISC SUPPLIES
$71.43
$372.83
ROLAND LISCHALK
HANDCUFF INSTRUCTORS COURSE
$18.00
518.00
LITTLE AMERICA
PRISONER FOOD APRIL 90
$164.10
$1641 10
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS L Of FIC
SUPPLIES
$28.20
$28.20
MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE
P-9 BODY.REPAIRS
$196.50
P-4 BODY REPAIRS
$176.50
P-11 BODY REPAIRS
$162.65
P-4 BODY REPAIRS
$2v538.22
$39073.87
GARY MALUR
REFUND DUPL STICKER PURCHASE
320.00
$20.00
MCGRUFF HOUSE
MCGRUFF POSTERS
$74.75
$714.75
MICRORIM♦ INC.
SOFTWARE
$175.00
$175.00
HOWARD MILLER REMODELLING
COBS-1604 W CATALPA
$29046.67
$21046.67
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 5
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/10/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
MINUTEMAN PRESS
BUSINESS CARDS
56$.25
$61.25
PHYLLIS MOLIERE
TALK OF THE TOWN CREW
$10.00
$10.00
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
SERVICE
SI4.17
$14*17
MOTOROLA COMMUNICATIONS
RADIO
Slv440.00
$1$440.00
MOTOROLA$ INC.
ADAPTERS
$185.31
$$85.31
NATIONAL SAFETY COUNCIL
FAMILY SAFETY MAGAZINE
(904.00
E904.0G'
NORTH EAST MULTI REGIONAL TRAI
TUITION-NICHOLSON* SALATINO
(70.00
$70.06
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
SS GOLF 1 W WAPELLA
(83.15
19 NORTHWEST HWY
(217.02
$3'00.17
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
TRAINING-OACEVv RICHARDSON
$520.00
TUITION-LISCHALKs CONDON
3550.00
SIVOT0000
ORR SAFETY EQUIPMENT COMPANY
MAZ MAT EQUIPMENT
31*829.413
f19829.40
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL NOTICE
$24.37
COM PK LOT REHAB
$70.68
LAWN TRACTOR NOTICE
$20.00
LEGAL PAGE
$56.06
$171.11
P8I INSULATION
CDBG-10'5 N HORNER LN
$492.50
(492.50
PEDERSEN S HOUPT
TRANSFER TAX -APRIL 90
$310.00
LEGAL SERVICES -MARCH
f8*384.28
$89694.28
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$469.72
$469.72*
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
683.10
f183.T0
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$124.29
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
$71.79
3196.0.,
POSTMASTER
WATER BILLS POSTAGE
$418.05
O
NEWSLETTER POSTAGE
f2*298.05
$29716.10*
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
SERVICES RENDERED
$258.75
(258.75
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
STRAYS -APRIL 90
$381.00
$381.00
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
(186.50
$186.50
LESTER QUAM
REFUND -CROSSROADS CASH ESCROW
$13000.00
$Is000.00
R. PRINTING COMPANY
PW OPEN HOUSE SIGNS
$379.00
$379.00
REI TITLE SERVICES
SERVICES RENDERED
$150.00
$150.00
ROBERT RIORDAN
BASIC HOMICIDE INViESTIGATION
$6.00
$6.00
RJN ENVIRONMENTAL ASSOCIATES
SERVICES RENDERED
$21p242.34
SERVICES RENDERED
f2+242.33
$4x484.67
RMRS SYSTEM
POSTAGE METER ADVANCE
$3,000.00
S3v000.00*
ROSCOR CORPORATION
SERVICE
$150.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
ROSEMONT BUILDING E SUPPLT CO.
ROTARY CLUB OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MICHAEL SALATINO
SAVE -A -PET
SCBAS• INC.
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
WALTER SKOWRON
STEINER ELECTRIC
STERLING CODIFIERS* INC.
SUBURBAN GAS SALES
SULLIVAN PRESS
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INCORPORATED
ROBERT TOBA
TRIO OFFICE MACHINES C EQUIPME
UNIVERSAL ASBESTOS REMOVAL
VIKING OFFICE PRODUCTS
VISA
V.150 -SEWER CLEAN C SEAL* INC.
VITAL RECORD BANC9 INC.
VICTOR WASYNCZUK
THEODORE J. WATTENBERG
NEST PUBLISHING CO.
WHITE COLLAR SERVICES
XEROX CORP.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/10190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SERVICE
575.00
6225.00
SUPPLIES
$485.76
5485.76
OUES-DIXON
$92.25
$92.25
EXPENSES
$6.00
$6.00
STRAYS -APRIL 90
$210.00
$210.00
SUPPLIES
$8x536.00
$89536.00
OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
$9.62
OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
$I1.27
OPEN HOUSE SUPPLIES
$4.28
$25.17
REFUND FINAL BILL
122.80
REFUND FINAL BILL
$2.20
(25.00
SUPPLIES
5687.50
$687.50
BOOKLET SUPPLEMENTS
$941.40
$941.40
OXYGEN
$60.00
$60.00
FORMS
$100.00
5100.00
MTCE AGREEMENT
$216800
$216.00
TALK OF THE TOWN CREW
510.00
$10.00
TYPEWRITERS
$790.00
TYPEWRITERS
$19035.00
TYPEWRITER
$345.00
$2*170.00
BOOSTER STA ASB REM
$2.700.00
$2*T00.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$281.46
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$5.48
$286894
PERSONNEL RECRUITMENT
$217.98
1227.98
SERVICES RENDERED
518*124.29
$189124.29
MICROFILMING £ SUPPLIES
$338.28
$338.28
REFUND FINAL BILL
$3.01
REFUND FINAL BILL
5.24
$3.25
EXPENSES
$356.06
$356.06
V£H CODE BOOKS
191.50
$91.50
TEMP HELP-NEWTSON
$388.70
TEMP HELP-NEWTSON
$336.37
$T25.07
TONER CARTRIDGE
$248.00
SUPPLIES
$234.00
5482.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS ***TOTAL** $652*341.61
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
BAKSTAD PHOTOGRXPHICS PHOTO CHGS OF MAYOR TEICWERT' S'S 5.00 $55.00*
NOtTW'WEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE DUES $15,500.00 S159500.00
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL**. 515,555.00
GENERAL FUND $159555.00
VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE
ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC ANNUAL MTG 6165.00 5165.00
XEROX CORP. SERVICE AGREEMENT 5141.27 5141.27
VILLAGE MANAGER#S OFFICE #$#TOTAL## $30+5.27
GENERAL FUND $306.27
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CABLE COUN DUES $7*152.00 f7s152.00
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE
5/10/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOi'1NT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND
$460#483.ZZ
MOTOR FUEL TAX
FUND
$101771.37
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
S7t602.87
ILL. MUNICIPAL
RETIREMENT FUND
$56*134.53
MATER S SEWER FU10
$8tztZ00.53
PARKING SYSTEM
ZEITENUE FUND
;3$813.96
RISK MANAGEMENT FU`NO
Stltl96.98
CAPITAL IMPRV.
C REPL. FUND
$822.31
FLEXCOMP ESCROW FUND
S7t169.92
ESCROW DEPOSIT
FUND
Ti*545.92
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
BAKSTAD PHOTOGRXPHICS PHOTO CHGS OF MAYOR TEICWERT' S'S 5.00 $55.00*
NOtTW'WEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE DUES $15,500.00 S159500.00
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION ***TOTAL**. 515,555.00
GENERAL FUND $159555.00
VILLAGE MANAGER*S OFFICE
ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC ANNUAL MTG 6165.00 5165.00
XEROX CORP. SERVICE AGREEMENT 5141.27 5141.27
VILLAGE MANAGER#S OFFICE #$#TOTAL## $30+5.27
GENERAL FUND $306.27
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CABLE COUN DUES $7*152.00 f7s152.00
VENDOR
CABLE TW OPERATIONS
WORD PROCESSING INDUSTRIES♦ IN
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/10190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
MTCE AGREEMENT
$7:75'2.00
PAGE 8
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$600.00 $600.00
***TOTAL** $7.752.00
DECISION DATA SERVICE INC.
PRINTER MTCE-MAY
$84.00
$84.00
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MTCE COMPUTERS E PRINTER
5104.09
$104.09
ILLTNOIS MUNICIPAL LEAGUE
ILLINOIS MUNICIPAL HANDBOOK
$10.00
$10.00
NCR CORPORATION
MTCE AGREEMENT
$233.00
$233.00
PITNEY BOWES INC.
CHCS -PHONE POSTAGE
$180.00
$180.00
XEROX CORP.
MONTHLY CHGS 1090 COPIER
32,818.89
SERVICE AGREEMENT
$141.27
52,960.16
XUDATACOMP INC.
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$12+00
$12.00
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
**#TOTAL**
$3,583.25
GENERAL FUND $39583.25
RISK MANAGEMENT
FORT DEARBORN LIFE INSURANCE C
HMO ILLINOIS
HOBBS GROUPv INC.
MART' E. KRUMSKE
RISK MANAGEMENT
LIFE INSURANCE -MAY♦ 1990
MAY HEALT14 INSURANCE
INSURANCE PREMIUM
FINAL SETTLEMENT
$1, 9'88.24
'$1, 988.24#
$6,845.78
$69845.78*
$1,129.00
$1,129.00
$375.26
$375.26
***TOTAL**
$20,338.28
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/'10/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND S10v338.18
INSPECTION SERVICES
AMERICAN PUBLIC HEALTH ASSOCIA MEMBERSHIP FEE $80.00 580.0(
SOCIETY OF THE PLASTICS IND. PUBLICATION $15.00 $15.00
XL/DATACOMP INC. MAINTENANCE SERVICE $12.00 $12.00
INSPECTION SERVICES ***TOTAL** $107.00
GENERAL FUND
POLICE DEPARTMENT
AAA TRAVEL AGENCY
AMERICAN RUNNING EFITNESS ASSN
COMM. ON ACCREDITATION FOR LAW
JOHN DAHLBERG
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
INTERNATIONAL ASSOC. OF ARSON
MOTOR VEHICLE MANUF. ASSOC.
NATIONAL CRIME PREVENTION INS.
NORTHERN ILLINOIS POLICE CRIME
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS
SPIAA VIRGINIA 1990
THE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
Xt/DA'TACOMP INC.
5107.00
CONFER ENC E-DA'LEY
5213.00
$213.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$25.00
$25.00
IST INSTALL RE -ACCREDITATION FEE
$2x443.75
52.443.7
EXPENSES
;103.50
5103.50
MTCE L COPIES APRIL 90
$116.19
MTCE E COPIES APRIL 90
5252.53
S358.72
DUES-GISSON
$13.00
S13.00
PUBLICATION
$15.00
$15.00.
TUITION-ROSCOP
$368.00
5368.00
AFIS CONTRIBUTION
S32x069.00
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT
334.519.00
'5669588.00
MAINTENANCE
$552.00
SUPPLIES
$255.25
$807.25
REGISTRATION-DALEYx RICHARDSON
$300.00
$300.00
TUITION
$29400.00
$29400.00
MAINTENANCE 'SERVICE
$60.00
$60.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT ***TOTAL** 5739705.22
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5f10I90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $739705.22
FIRE C EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
DANIEL ACKERMAN
BASIC FIRE PROTECTION INC.
BURGER KING
EDWARD CAVELLO
FIRE CHIEF
HANSEN ASSOCIATES
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS FOUND.
SECRETARY OF STATE
SERVICE AMERICA CORP.
SOUTHERN RISC. E N0. ILL. FIRE
XL/DATACOMP INC.
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
EXPENSES
$50.00
$50.00
SUPPLIES
$1,013.80
SIVO13.8C
FOOD C DRINKS
$71.02
$71.02-
EXPENSES
$105.00
$105.00
S(IBSCRIPTION
$50.00
$50.00
MTCE L COPIES APRIL 90
$116.19
$716.19
REGISTRATION
'$125.00
$125.00
T I TL E
$5.00
$`5.00#
NATL FIRE ACADEMY
543.75
$43.75
DUES
$15.00
$15.00
MAINTENANCE SERVICE
$63.00
$63.00
***TOTAL**
$1,657.76
$1,657.76
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENOEREO $2$,299.00 $28V299.00s
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $28,299.00
GENERAL FUND
$28,299.00
STREET DIVISION
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
$74.95
PAGE 11
UNIFORM
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$16.89
UNIFORM
PAYMENT DATE 5/10/90
$73.71
VENDOR
UNIFORM
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPARTMENT
SUPPLIES
$Z.69
MICHAEL J. MORAN
CDBG-1005 W PENDLETON
1157.00
$157.00
VANS ARTISTS
DESIGNERS SUPPt'IE
OFFICE SUPPLIES
Y2.41 -
$34.57
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$10.06
57.65
XEROX CORP.
TCI OF ILLINOIS
SERVICE AGREEMENT
$141.28
$141.28
PLANNING AND
ZONING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$305.9?
GENERAL
FUND
6148.93 COMMUNITY OEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
$157.00
STREET DIVISION
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM
SERVICE
$74.95
UNIFORM
SERVICE
$16.89
UNIFORM
SERVICE
$73.71
UNIFORM
SERVICE
$19.05
6184.60
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL L
SUPPLIES
$Z.69
TRAVEL E
SUPPLIES
$2.66
TRAVEL C
SUPPLIES
$34.57
TRAVEL E
SUPPLIES
$5.34
145.26
TCI OF ILLINOIS
PW CABLE
BILL
39.75
19.75
STREET DIVISION
***TOTAL**
SZ39.61
GENERAL FUND
(239.61
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM
SERVICE
$74.94
VENDOR
WATEk AND SEWER DIVISION
I.B.M. CORPORATION
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
SECRETARY OF STATE
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
WATER E SEWER FUND
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5110/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
UNIFORM SERVICE
MTCE COMPUTERS E PRINTER
EMPLOYMENT AO
CLERICAL AD
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
It VEH LIC RENEWAL
$ 95 3.53
PAGE 12
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
Sl6.89
$T3.71
$19.05
$184.59
$iG4.08
$104.08
S2219.95
$240.90
$470.85
$5.19
39.30
$.55
St30.97
$146.01
$48.00
$48.00
***TOTAL**
$953.53
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
SOLID WASTE AGENCY OF NORTHERN EQUITY CHG-IST INSTALL 38.091.00 $8.091.Of
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION ***TOTAL** '$89091.00
GENERAL FUND
$81091.00
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
MOUNT PROSPECT JAYCEES PA'RAD'E JULY 4T" PARADE $10.000.00 $101000.00*
VFW POST 133T MEMORIAL DAY PARADE $600.00 $600.004
rt°
COMMUNITY ANIS CIVIC SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 5/10/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$10*600.00
INVOIC3E AMOUNT
"*TOTAL**
PAGE 13
TOTAL
310.600.00
tt#a�z####aas##�R#a#sata�##attti�##a####a####a�x�Fat#a#ses�st#ssa##�#fit#�Rg##s s##sem
PENSION FUNDS
FIRST NAT•L BANK OF MT. PROS.
WITHHOLDING TAXES
32'00.00
1200.00'
CHARLES We NICK
PENSION MAY 90
:883,.22
$883.22
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
JUNE MEDICAL INSURANCE
5346.33
$3+46.33
PAUL H. WATKINSS
MAY DISABILITY BENEFIT
$lv620.50
S1*620.50
PENSION FUNDS
***TOTAL**
33#050..05
GENERAL FUND
5883.22 BENEFIT TRUST OZ
$29166.83
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
$816*885.51
DATE RUN 5/10/90 VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 14
TIME RUN 13.19.09 ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL LISTING ID -APPEAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 5l10f90
NO* FUND NAME AMOUNT
I GENERAL FUND $611:4i1.48
22 MOTOR FUEL TAR FUND S10t77I.37
23 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT S7*759.87
24 Itt. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $56*134.53
31 BENEFIT TRUST 02 529166.83
41 WATER E SEWER FUND S87r154.06
46 PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $3*813.96
49 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $289135.26
51 CAPITAL IMPRV• 'E REPL. FUND 5822.31
73 FLEXCOMP ESCR0W FUND $79169.92
74 ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND Si*545.92
TOTAL ALL FUNDS 58169885.51
sss�ssi�ss*��sssss�R�#ss��ssEs<sssss�Ra�sa��s�ssss�s�+� �s<si��ac:0�-s�sl�sssss�R:o� ��ssysa�a�f�*ss�ks:�:�kss
° `° PRESS RELEASE
Cook County Department of Public Health
1500 S. Maybrook Drive, Maywood, IL 60153
May 4,1990
FOR RELEASE: Immediately
FOR INFORMATION, CONTACT: Charles Hackl, Environmental Health Director, 865-474.8
Marguerite Adelman, Public Information Officer, 865-6415
Mount Prospect Receives Two Plaques for Food Program
Dr. Karen Scott, Director of the Cook County Department of Public Health, will be
presenting two plaques to the Village of Mount Prospect at its regular board meeting (50 S.
Emerson Street in Mount Prospect) on Tuesday, May 15, 1990 at 7:30 p.m.
The first plaque will be presented to the Village Board and recognizes the cooperative
effort shown by the Village Board in bringing their food service sanitation and retail food store
inspection programs into compliance with current federal, state, and county regulations in an
effort to obtain regulation uniformity nationwide.
The second plaque, presented to Mr. Robert -J. Roels, Coordinator of the Mount
Prospect Environmental Health Division, recognizes his demonstrated proficiency and
competence in inspectional procedures and his knowledge of Illinois food service regulations.
Mr. Roels is a 1980 graduate of Illinois State University with a degree in Environmental Health.
He has been working for the Village of Mount Prospect for nine (9) years.
The Cook County Department of Public Health's Environmental Division conducts this
food service evaluation program in conjunction with local health departments.
Phone: 7o8/39e-60o0
Fax 70a / 392'60ee
May 2, 1990
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Karen L. Scutt, M.D., M.P.H.
1500 S. Maybrook
Maywood, IL 60153
Dear Ms. Waren L. Scott:
Thank you for accepting my invitation to present the Village of Mount
Prospect with a Certificate of Achievement for successful completion
of the standardization exercise offered by Cook County Department
of Public Health. As per our conversation, you are scheduled to appear
before the Village Board on May 15, 1990, 7:30 P.M. at 50 South Emerson.
If you need any further information, please call 870-5675.
[ would like to thank you and Mr' Haukl for your patience
this exercise. I found this exercise extremely beneficial and l am
encouraged to work with another agency to ensure the publics health
is protected at a larger scale. [ will and have recommended this
exercise to other communities.
Sincerely,
-;77'��
Robert J. Roela, R.S.
Environmental Health Coordinator
cc: Chuck Haokl
Mr. John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
^
GERALD L FARLEYTIMOTHY
TRUIlITINS
RALPH W ARTHUR
J. CORCORAN
LEO FLOROS
GEORGE R. VAN GEEM
THEODORE ^°ATTENBERG
Village of Mount Prospect
JOHN FULTON DIXON
*uA911 CURK
100 S. Emerson Mount Prospect.m/no/s 60056
CAROL A. FIELDS
Phone: 7o8/39e-60o0
Fax 70a / 392'60ee
May 2, 1990
COOK COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH
Karen L. Scutt, M.D., M.P.H.
1500 S. Maybrook
Maywood, IL 60153
Dear Ms. Waren L. Scott:
Thank you for accepting my invitation to present the Village of Mount
Prospect with a Certificate of Achievement for successful completion
of the standardization exercise offered by Cook County Department
of Public Health. As per our conversation, you are scheduled to appear
before the Village Board on May 15, 1990, 7:30 P.M. at 50 South Emerson.
If you need any further information, please call 870-5675.
[ would like to thank you and Mr' Haukl for your patience
this exercise. I found this exercise extremely beneficial and l am
encouraged to work with another agency to ensure the publics health
is protected at a larger scale. [ will and have recommended this
exercise to other communities.
Sincerely,
-;77'��
Robert J. Roela, R.S.
Environmental Health Coordinator
cc: Chuck Haokl
Mr. John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
PROCLAMATION
WHEREAS, motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death
for people between the ages of one and 34 in the United States
-- more than 50,000 in 1980 and 47,093 in 1988; and
WHEREAS, motor vehicle crashes are the number one cause of
death of children over the age of six months of age in the
United States; and
WHEREAS, when used, lap and shoulder safety belts can reduce
the risk of fatal or serious occupant injury by between 40 and
55 percent; and
WHEREAS, motor vehicle crashes are the leading trauma-related
cause of spinal cord injuries, epilepsy and mental retardation
in the United States and the current nationwide economic
losses resulting from traffic crashes exceed $74 billion each
year; and
WHEREAS, the use of safety belts and child safety seats are
known to be one of the best defenses against the drunk and
drugged driver; and
WHEREAS, 33 states and the District of Columbia have safety
belt use laws and all 50 states and District of Columbia have
enacted laws requiring the use of child passenger safety
systems; and
WHEREAS, the BUCKLE UP AMERICA! Week, designated for May 21-
28, 1990 as a nationwide challenge, will give communities and
organizations a unique opportunity to increase the correct use
of safety belts and child safety seats by focusing public
attention on the lifesaving benefits of these systems,
including automatic belt systems and air bags;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Village of Mount
Prospect will join in this important nationwide program,
BUCKLE UP AMERICA!, and call upon all citizens to establish
a goal of always buckling up when traveling in motor vehicles.
I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount Prospect,
in recognition of this lifesaving opportunity, do hereby
proclaim the week of May 21-28, 1990 as
"BUCKLE UP AMERICA! WEEK"
and encourage the community to observe the week with
appropriate programs, ceremonies and activities to increase
correct use of safety belts and child safety seats and public
awareness of the "Winning Combination" these systems form with
the new automatics such as air bags.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, public works services provided in our community are an
integral part of our citizens, everyday lives; and
WHEREAS, the support of an understanding and informed citizenry
is vital to the efficient operation of a public works system and
its many programs relating to water, sewers, streets and high-
ways, public buildings, public grounds, solid waste collection,
recycling, trees, and snow removal; and
WHEREAS, the quality and effectiveness of these facilities, as
well as their planning, design, and construction, are vitally
dependent upon the efforts and skills of public works officials;
and
WHEREAS, the efficiency of the qualified and dedicated personnel
who staff public works departments is materially influenced by
the people's attitude and understanding of the importance of the
work they perform; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Public Works Department will host an
Open House on Saturday, May 19, 1990, between the hours of 9:00
A.M. and 1:00 P.m., in an effort to acquaint the residents of
the Village of Mount Prospect with the many services provided by
that department;
I invite everyone to attend the Open House for a tour of the
facility, inspection of the equipment, and the opportunity to
talk to employees who can more fully explain the various opera-
tions of the department.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, GERALD L. FARLEY, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the week of May 20 through
26, 1990 as PUBLIC WORKS WEEK in the Village of Mount Prospect,
and I call upon all citizens and civic organizations to acquaint
themselves with the various services provided by the Mount Pros-
pect Public Works Department in order to assure the health,
safety, and comfort of our residents.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
P R 0 C L A X A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Historical Society has
preserved and disseminated information on the history of
Mount Prospect since 1967; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Historical Society has
maintained and kept open to the public the museum located
at 1100 South Linnemann Road since 1976; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Historical Society and the
Village of Mount Prospect have formed a partnership to
establish a permanent downtown museum at 101 South Maple
Street; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Historical Society is actively
raising funds for the restoration of said museum in
cooperation with the citizens; and
WHEREAS, the people of Mount Prospect are supporting this
project contributing money, volunteer time, expertise,
services and materials; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Historical Society has been
recognized for its volunteer efforts through the 1989
Governor's Hometown Award and Certificate of Excellence
from the Congress of Illinois Historical societies and
Museums; and
WHEREAS, the Mount Prospect Historical Society will mark
Museum Day in Mount Prospect as celebrated across the
country, on Thursday, May 31, 1990 at the School Museum
from 5 to 7 P.M. as a tribute to the volunteers and as an
introduction of the new museum Director, Michelle Oberly.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village
of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the month of may as
"MUSEUM MONTH" in the Village Thursday, May 31, 1990 as
"MUSEUM DAY" and encourage the continued support of this
civic organization.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Next Ordinance No. 4183
Next Resolution No. 21-90
A G E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, let Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
May 15, 1990
7:30 P. M.
Mayor Gerald O'Skip" Parley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floras
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Corcoran
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, May 1, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS AND FINANCIAL REPORT
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. Administer oath of Office:
Police Officer Donna Woodside
Sergeant Ted Adamczyk
B. Presentation: Retirement of Sgt. Patrick Hallihan,
following 23-1/2 years with the Mount Prospect
Police Department
C. Presentation: Cook County Health Department
D. Request of Lions Club to waive a fees and out of
pocket expenses involved with conducting their
annual Village Fair,
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATIONS:
1. Buckle Up America Week, May 21 - 28, 1990
2. Public Works Week,
B. Consider for relief from regulations governing
shrubs in right-of-way.
C. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE 13.124.A
OF CHAPTER 13 OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance increases the fine that can be
assessed by the Liquor Commissioner for a
violation and creates a provision to reimburse
the Village for costs incurred for a hearing (Exhibit
?? D. Appointments
D. ZBA 31-V-90, 1400 Kensington Road (Northwest Assembly
of God Church)
The Petitioner is requesting the following variations:
to allow a zero foot front yard, instead of 401; a
51 side yard, instead of 101; a 101 rear yard, instead
of 251; lot coverage of 75%, instead of 35%; a building
height of 401, instead of 281; to waive the additional
setbacks required for a 401 high building; to allow
724 parking spaces, instead of 755; and, parking stalls
81 6" wide instead of 91. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended
E. ZBA 32 -SU -90, Mount Prospect Commons Shopping Center
Northwest corner Golf and Busse Roads
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow a
day care facility in this shopping center. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
F. ZBA 25-A-90, Text Amendment
The following text amendments are proposed by staff:
amend Section 14.602.E and F, Rules and Definitions
of Yard, to better list and define permitted
obstructions in side and front yards; to amend
various sections relative to permitted obstructions
in required yards; and various sections to prohibit
a Petition being re -submitted within a one year
period following a denial of the original Petition.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
P R 0 C L A X A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, in 1962, President John F. Kennedy designated a
week in May as a time to recognize National Peace Officers'
Memorial Week, in order to honor law enforcement personnel
who have given their lives in the performance of their
duty; and I
WHEREAS, line -of -duty deaths are ever present risk for
those in the field of law enforcement; and
WHEREAS, in 1989, sixty-five local, county, state and
federal law enforcement officers were feloniously killed in
the performance of their duty; and
WHEREAS, the effect of a line -of -duty death is devastating
to the survivors as well as the community as a whole.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village
of Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim the week of May 14 -
19, 1990 as PEACE OFFICERS' MEMORIAL WEEK in the Village
and call upon everyone to remember those who have died in
the performance of their duty as law enforcement officers
and to offer continued support to the survivors, both
family members and fellow officers, following their loss.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 15th day of May, 1990.
Village of
cunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MAY 11, 1990
SUBJECT: SIGHT OBSTRUCTIONS THAT WERE BROUGHT TO THE BOARD'S
ATTENTION AT THE LAST BOARD MEETING
At 905 Westgate, the owner of the property was informed that bushes at the comer of
the property at Westgate and Ironwood had to be cut down to a height of 30". Since
the Board meeting, the owner of the property has trimmed the bushes down suitable for
sight obstruction reasons. There is also an evergreen in the front yard which we have
determined does not have to be trimmed at this time but may have to at some time ill
the future. The major contention is in the side yard where there is a chainlink fence
approximately eight feet into the right-of-way which, most definitely, has to be removed
because it is a permanent structure that has been placed in the right-of-way without a
proper permit.
We have had similar situations where we have had people who have built swimming
pools on to rigbt-of-ways who were made to remove the swimming pools. At the
minimum, the owner of this property should remove that section of fence which is in the
right-of-way.
We would also suggest in order to be consistent with the photographs that are attached
from 1201 Barberry that these bushes be trimmed to a 42" height after the removal of
the fence.
At 1304 Ironwood, there are three bushes along the edge of the driveway which are in
the right-of-way. All three of these bushes should be cut down to a 30" height so there
is not a sight problem pulling out of the driveway or for anyone walking or riding a
bicycle out of the driveway.
At 1310 Ironwood, the evergreen tree that is 'on the curb needs to be cut up six feet.
The photograph that is enclosed in the packet shows a car behind the tree that is coming
around the curve that cannot be seen at all.
JFD/rcw
attachments
JOHN FULTON DION
Josef Baltasi
905 Westgate
Mount Prospect, IL
60056
Village of Mount Prospect
Mayor Gerald Farley and
all Trustees
Re: Public right-of-way.
April 26, 1990
Dear Mr. Mayor and Trustees,
I presented my case to you at the board meeting on March 6, 1990.
The following was discussed:
- purchased house in 1978.
- before planting the bushes in question, went to city hall zoning
department to inquire whether they would be violating the right
of way - there was no objection, unless a sidewalk were to be
built.
- spent $1500.00 to purchase bushes.
- cost to replant would be $3600.00 with no guarantee of survival.
- cutting the bushes to the required 30", would "kill" them with-
in months.
1 ask the board whether the grandfather clause applied in this
case due to the afore mentioned reasons.
This was to be taken under advisement by the board, however I
have received no response to this date.
QUESTIONS
1. Who introduced ordinance and when introduced?
2. In a letter from the public works department from 12/11/89,
I was allowed to keep a 13' spruce tree in the right of way
but I must remove 36 bushes which stand 9' away from the curb
and are parallel with Ironwood. (see copy of pictures & attached
schematic).
Why does selective enforcement exist????
3. If the purpose of clearing out the right of way is eliminating
sight obstruction - why would I have to move my transparent
chainlink fence?
Hoping for your understanding and speedy reply.
Sincerely
Jtef Bltasi
D
Deputy Director
Glen R Andler
Water Sup inte,dem,
Jerry 771ntosh
Street Superintendent
erinten4e,t
Melvyn L Bon
ForestrV Superintendent
Sandra M Clark
Administrative Aide
M. Lisa Angel, Mount Prospect Public Works Department P
1 700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056 'IWE CM t NA
Rhone 31 2/870-5640
November 8, 1989
CERTIFIED MAIL
Joseph Baltasi
505 Westgate
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mr. Baltasi:
Village ordinances prohibit the planting of evergreens and shrubbery
in the public right-of-way. These plants eventually block the view
of motorists and pedestrians, and if an accident should occur there
is the potential for a lawsuit. We must enforce our ordinances in
order to protect the Village, and ultimately Mount Prospect taxpay-
ers, from liability cases.
A recent survey has identified the following noncomplying plants in
your parkway:
One 131 spruce, two 3-41 yews, two 3741 Burning Bush, 7'
Arborvitae hedge (on Ironwood)
Although technically the ordinances prohibit these plants, as a com-
promise measure we will allow pruning to improve visibility. No
foliage will be allowed to remain in the zone between 3011 above the
road surface and 6 feet above the road surface. Thus, shrubbery
heights must not exceed 3011, and branches on evergreen trees must be
removed up to at least 6 feet.
We are asking residents to prune shrubbery they wish to retain by
4/1/90. After that date, any shrubbery exceeding 3011 will be removed
by Village forces. At the same time, Village crews will remove all
branches up to a height of 6 feet on evergreen trees which are at
least 121 high. Evergreen trees less than 121 high will be cut down
by Village forces.
You may prefer to relocate noncomplying plants onto your private
property, at your own expense. This letter will serve as your permit
to do so. Again, please take this action by 4/1/90.
I hope you will understand that these measures must be taken for the
protection of all Mount Prospect residents. Thank you for your co-
operation.
sincerely,
dandy Clark
SC/eh Forestry Superintendent
hire p44r
Herber[: L_ Wer,KS
Deputy Director
(;ler, R Andler
Water Superintendent
Jerry W Wlntosh
Street Superintendent
Melvyn L Roth
Forestry Superintendent
Sanwa M Clark
Adrnirmt-ti- Aid. 00
M LiFa Anqed
Mount Prospect Public Works Department 9
1 700 W. Central Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 6005E3 iva crn tSA
Rhone 31 2/670-5640
December 11, 1989
Mr. Joseph Baltasi
905 Westgate
Mount Prospect, IL 60056
Dear Mr. Baltasi:
It was a pleasure meeting with you last week and discussing your
plantings on public right-of-way. As our forester's letter of
November 8 stated, village ordinances prohibit evergreen plant-
ings in the right-of-way and, under some circumstances, they
create a sight obstruction which could result in an accident.
In an effort to minimize the problem for you and still protect
the Village from potential litigation in the event of an acci-
dent, I have agreed to the following schedule.
a) Compliance date has been extended from April 1, 1990 to May
15, 1990.
b) The 131 spruce north of your driveway on Westgate may re-
main in its present state, with no trimming.
c) The two yews and two burning bushes at the radius by the
stop sign must be trimmed to a maximum of 30" overall
height.
d) The arborvitae hedge on Ironwood must be trimmed to 3011
maximum height or removed.
c)) Your chain link fence paralleling Ironwood Drive is on
public right-of-way by several feet and will have to be
relocated back to your property line. Please contact the
director of Inspection Services at 100 S. Emerson for the
pertinent information relating to fence location.
If there are any further questions, feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Herbert L. Weeks
Director Public Works
HLW/td
attach. (schematic)
c: C. Bencic, Director Inspection Services
J. F. Dixon, Village Manager
S. Clark, Village Forester
Mount Prospect, Illinois Public Works Departm , ent
y ,r
>SP
905
t i
\Ai S TG A, T
OF,.10(--K/ RIGHT -OF
WAY
- 2 -YEWS
71
Z, E N E
2 HRU13S
Ilk
NOT 0
SCALE
,,„�.,�.� � ��
��.
_u
�� a� ��
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE
AMENDING THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS
BE IT ORDAINED by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, acting in the
exercise of their home rule power:
SECTION 1: That paragraph A of Section 13.124 of Chapter 13
be deleted in its entirety and a new paragraph A inserted in lieu
thereof to be and read as follows:
A. After a hearing on any alleged violation, if the
Village President as Local Liquor Control
Commissioner finds that there was any violation of
the ordinances of the Village or statutes of the
State of Illinois, or any other violation
necessitating action by the Local Liquor Control
Commissioner, he may suspend or revoke any retail
liquor dealer's license; and/or fine such licensee.
1. If the Commissioner determines to
suspend such license, the term of
the suspension shall not be less
than one day nor more than thirty
(30) days.
2. If the Commissioner elects to fine
such licensee, the amount of such
fine shall not be less than fifty
dollars ($50.00) nor more than two
thousand five hundred dollars
($2,500.00).
3. If the Commissioner finds the
licensee to be guilty of any charges
against the licensee, the licensee
will be responsible for all costs
incurred for a hearing before the
Local Liquor Control Commissioner,
including, but not limited to court
reporter fees, witness fees and
attorneys fees. This shall be in
addition to any other penalties
assessed against the licensee.
SECTION 2: That all ordinances or parts of ordinances in
conflict herewith are hereby repealed.
SECTION 3: That this ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
PASSED: This day of
AYES: NAYS: ABSENT: PASS:
APPROVED by me this day of
f 1990.
President of the Village of Mt. Prospect
ATTESTED and FILED in the office of the Village Clerk this
day of 1990.
IN 11— ell -,Ie
VILL--XGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Michael E. Sims, Planner 35—
DATE: May 10, 1990
SUBJECT: Orchard Field Townhomes Resubdivision, 400 East Rand Road, Development
Code Modifications to Permit Buildings Closer Than 75 Feet to Detention
Facilities
The applicant is seeking approval of a resubdivision plat and modification to the
Development Code. The site currently consists of two lots with a total area 2.79 acres. The
specific site is on the northeast side of Rand Road between single-family homes on the
south side of Highland Avenue and a single-family home just north of Matt's Funeral Home
on Rand Road. Currently there is a single-family home located on the site, The developer
intends to build 22 townhomes on five lots. Access to the townhomes will from a private
cul-de-sac of less than 500 feet in length.
The Plan Commission met in regular session on April 4, 1990 and voted 6-0 in favor of
approving the five lot subdivision with one outlot. The vote was made contingent upon
staff's review and assurance that the storm sewer to Highland Avenue from the site is
adequate and operational for the development. The Plan Commission then voted 6-0 in
favor of recommending that detention facilities be permitted to be no less than 10 feet from
other structures. This vote was made contingent upon soil boring tests showing adequate
soil stability.
MES:cl
Approved:
I -0-
a id M. Clements
Planning & Zoning Director
`VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
,
PAUL BEDNARPLANKTER NER
SUBJECT: BLUE JAY BUILDERS ORCHARD FIELD TOWNHOUSE
PROPOSAL
LOCATION: 400 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE: APRIL 11, 1990
The petitioner, Blue Jay Builders is proposing a townhouse redevelopment- on what is now
two large single family lots along Rand Road. This development will have access off of
Rand Road and back up to the single family subdivisions along Highland Avenue and
Eastman Court. Public hearings were held before the Zoning Board of Appeals and Plan
Commission in order to address specific concerns. The findings of each Board can be found
below.
Zoning Board of Appeals
On February 2, 1990, Blue Jay Builders presented their case to the Zoning Board of
Appeals requesting the following:
1. A rezoning is required from R-1, Single -Family; to R-3, Multi -Family Residential.
2. A special Use/Planned Unit Development originally proposing 24 townhouse
units has since been reduced to 22 units.
3. A variation from the P.U.D. requirements in order to allow a 10 foot setback
from the cul-de-sac bulb to the east property line, instead of 20 feet as required.
At the meeting, the petitioner explained that a multi -family townhouse development fits the
site better than either single family residential or a commercial development. The
petitioner said that, in order to develop these parcels as single family residential with lots
on both sides of a cul-de-sac, they would need a much wider frontage on Rand Road than
they have. They explained that an effort was made to acquire the remaining single family
lot to the south in order to incorporate it into this proposal, but they were unsuccessful.
The main issue with this request was that of appropriate zoning for this property. After an
analysis of possible redevelopment scenarios, staff offered the Board the opinion that a
multi -family rezoning is justified.
The original proposal at 24 units (8.8 dwelling units per acre) was compared to recent
townhouse developments, such as, Evergreen Woods, Village Commons, and Courts of St.
John, and found to be at a slightly lower density. Several land plans for this site have been
prepared by the staff within the past few years, addressing potential commercial and multi
family projects. It was found that a townhouse plan was the best alternative. A concern
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
April 11, 1990
of everyone present at the hearing was that a redevelopment of this subject parcel will have
a direct bearing on the remaining single fancily lot to the south on Rand Road. The site
plan submitted addresses a possible Phase II townhouse development on this one remaining
parcel.
The second main issue of this request is the specific site plan. At the hearing several
concerns were voiced by staff which were incorporated as conditions of the approval.
Several neighbors from Highland and Eastman Court were present at the hearing to request
certain conditions be attached to any approval: These items include:
1. A 6 foot high fence on the east property line erected as soon as possible to screen
out construction.
2. A guard-rail erected on the east side of the cul-de-sac and the cul-de-sac bulb
shifted further from the east property line than the 10 foot proposed.
3. A maximum of 22 units, if a detention pond is added.
4. A brick facade required for the buildings
5. The installation of a sidewalk on both sides of the street, possibly reduced in
width.
None of the neighbors present had any objection to the concept of a townhouse.
After some discussion, the Zoning Board members agreed that this was a good proposal.
Multi family, low density townhouses, rather than commercial or single family fit this site
best. They expressed the desire to have the adjacent single family property to the south
made part of this development, and requested the builder to re -approach the owner to try
to make it work. The standards for rezoning, special use and variations were reviewed
before the Zoning Board approved all requests unanimously, 7-0, with the following
conditions attached to the Special Use/ PUD.
1. Engineering plan approved by the Village Engineer regarding final determination
for the sewer locations. If a detention pond is required on the property, two units
may have to be deleted. NOTE: It has been determined that a detention pond is
necessary, and therefore, two units have been deleted (the total is now 22.)
2. Sidewalk installation to be determined by the staff and petitioner for recommen-
dation to the Village Board. NOTE: the builder at the request of neighbors will
provide sidewalks on both sides of the cul-de-sac.
3. Revised landscape plan to include more plantings on the north and east sides
and tree preservation plan approved by Village staff.
4. A 6 foot high wood fence along the east property line, to be installed after public
improvements are completed.
5. A guard rail installed on the east end of the cul-de-sac.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 3
April 11, 1990
6. On -street parking to be prohibited.
7. A minimum of 18 feet for driveway lengths.
8. A brick facade required for the buildings.
9. Formation of a Homeowner's Association.
Plan Commigign:
The applicant appeared before the Plan Commission on February 21, 1990 and again on
April 4, 1990 to request:
1. A change in the Comprehensive Plan from General Commercial/Office to Multi
Family Residential/Low Density.
2. Approval of a resubdivision plat.
3. Permission to locate a detention basin as close as 10 feet from the proposed buildings,
rather than 75 feet.
At the initial meeting, the Commission required the builder to work out details of the
detention basin easement before the plat could be approved. On April 4, the Commission
recommended approval of the plat unanimously, 6-0, provided that the storm sewer to
Highland is verified as being adequate and operating. A neighbor present at the hearing
noted that the sewer line is on his property and there is no recorded easement. If Blue Jay
ties into this line, an easement must be in place.
The Commission also deliberated the 10 foot separation from the detention basin to the
building. They voted unanimously to recommend approval 6-0 provided that soil borings
indicate there is stable ground for the buildings in the proposed locations.
The Comprehensive Plan request was approved unanimously 6-0. Residents present at the
hearing supported the change from commercial to multi -family.
Approved:
W4 M
David M. Clements, Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
W)UNT PROSPECT PLAN COMSSION
APRIL 4, 1990
The regular meeting of the Mount Prospect Plan Commission was called to
order by Chairman Donald Weibel at 8:00 P.M. at the Village Hall, 100
South Emerson Street, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
1 106)
Present upon Roll Call: Frank Boege
Tom Borrelli
Lynn Kloster
William Navigato
Louis Velasco
Donald Weibel, Chairman
Absent: Frank Breitsameter
Tom McGovern
Village Staff Present: Richadl Sims,'Staff Planner
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Mr. Boege moved, and Mr. Velasco seconded, that the minutes of March 21, 1990
be approved. All members voted Aye and Chairman Weibel declared the minutes
approved.
SUB -DIVISIONS
Orchard Field Townhomes Resubdivision.- The petitioner was requesting
approval of a subdivision plat and Development Code modifications to permit
buildings closer than 75 feet from detention facilities. Engineering and
Planning staffs indicated no objections provided that soil borings showed
adequate ground stability.
During the discussion on the project it was pointed out that a sewer drain
located just north of the project would receive the overflow from the
detention facility. A nearby resident, George Lieder, 401 Highland on whose
property the sewer drain is located, expressed concern about flooding of
his property. He stated that this drain is either blocked up or there is
no drain because it does not take water.
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. Borrelli, that the Orchard Field
Townhouses Subdivision plat be approved with the provision that the sewer
arrangements are operative and adequate. The vote was 6 Aye: 0 Nay. Motion
passed.
Mr. Boege moved. and seconded by Mr. Velasco, that the Development Code
modification permitting buildings 10 feet or greater from the detention
facility be approved, providing that soil borings show adequate ground
stability. The vote'was 6 Aye; 0 Nay. Motion passed.
PLAN COMMISSION
APRIL 4, 1990
PAGE 2
PLAT OF DEDICATION - Road Right -of -Way Dedication of 9 feet on the West Side
of North Forest Avenue, Memory Lane to Kensington Road
and Development Code modifications on Street Trees,
Street Width, Sidewalk and Parkway.
The request for dedication is to permit improvement of the one way street
through resurfacing and widening the present 16 ft. wide paved area to 20
feet and the addition of curb and gutter on the west side which is adjacent
to School District 214 property. There was a question as to whether or not
The Development Code required this plat to be presented to the Plan Commiss-
ion for consideration. The Code wording is ambiguous but it was agreed the
Plan Commission should hear it.
Mr. Sims stated that School District 214 would pay for the curb and gutter
on the west side and the village would pay for the road improvement to the
east side. Charles Miller of 715 North Forest Avenue was present and spoke
about his concern on traffic safety in the area and what effect the road
widening would have on traffic. He indicated that the street improvement
and widening had the approval of the residents but only on the basis that
it stayed a one way street. Mr. Navigato expressed his opinion that if
they were going part way with street improvement they should do it right
and go the whole way with full street width, curb and gutter, trees, side-
walk and lighting. Chairman Weibel asked for motions on the dedication and
on each of the Development Code modifications.
Mr. Boege moved, and seconded by Mr. Navigato, that the Development Code
Modification request to allow a curb to curb street width of 20 feet
instead of 28 feet be approved. The vote was 2 Aye; 4 Nay. Motion failed.
The reason given for the Nay vote was that it was felt that this was not
the best way to improve the street, if it was to be done it should be in
accordance with the Code.
Mr. Boege moved, and seconded by Mr. Velasco, for approval of the Devel-
opment Code Modification to eliminate the,parkway trees. The vote was
2 Aye; 4 Nay. Motion failed. Reason for the Nay vote was the same as in
the prior vote.
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. Navigato, for approval of the
Development Code Modification to eliminate a sidewalk on Forest Avenue.
The vote was 3 Aye; 3 Nay and Chairman Weibel declared the motion failed
for lack of 5 Aye votes. Reason for the Nay votes was the same.
Mr. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. Navigato, to approve the Develop-
ment Code Modification to eliminate the parkway on Forest Avenue. The vote
was 3 Aye; 3 Nay and Chairman Weibel declared the motion failed. Reason
for the Nay votes was the same as in the previous cases.
Mt. Velasco moved, and seconded by Mr. Navigato, to approve the Plat of,
Dedication for Road Right-of-Way'west side of North Forest Avenue between
Memory -Lane and Kensington Road. The vote was 2 Aye; 4 Nay. Motion failed.
Reason given for the Nay vote was the same as for the prior vote. Reason
given for the minority Nay vote was that besides the approval of the School
District and the Village, the project appeared to be what the residents of
the area wanted.
PLAN COMMISSION MINUTES PAGE 3
APRIL 4, 1990
COMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Community Development: Mr. Sims reported that the request for the Block
Grant funds had been submitted to HUD. It was
estimated that the Village would receive about $233,000.
B. Comprehensive Plan: No report
C. Development Code: No report
D. Text Amendment: No report
OLD BUSINESS
Mr. Boege reported on a concern that he had relating to the Plat of
Subdivision for the Lexington Homes Development that had been before the
Plan Commission for approval some time back. This Development was part of
a PUD agreement and there was a provision for a street from Schoenbeck to
enter at right angle to Rand Road. Mr. Boege said that nothing appears to
have been done on this and he is concerned because request for bids have
gone our for Schoenbeck Road Reconstruction from Persimmon Lane to Camp
McDonald Road but nothing for the Rand Road access work. He has not been
able to get a satisfactory answer from Engineering and feels there has been
dragging of feet on this. Chairman Weibel said that it would not be the
Plan Commission's prerogative to press the issue however Mr. Boege's
comments and concern would be noted.
Mr. Sims asked the Plan Commission to recommend specific language to change
Section 14.101G of the Zoning Ordinance regarding Lot Consolidation. Mr.
Weibel furnished two possible wordings and after discussion, Proposal No. 1
was thought to be the better version however recommendation was held up
pending clarification of wording from Mr. McGovern.
NEW BUSINESS
Mr. Sims reported on a one -day Planning and Zoning workshop scheduled for
Saturday, May 5 at the Alsip Holiday Inn and asked the Commission members
to let him know if anyone wished to attend.
KOZZO-INV&�
Mr. Charles Miller,who attended the meeting and spoke on the North Forest
Avenue Right -of -Way Dedication expressed his appreciation for the discussion
and concern given to the cases by the commission. He reiterated his concern
about traffic safety at the Prospect High School area and said he had not
been able to get a satisfactory response on the matter from the Village.
Mr. Sims stated that the Safety Commission was the proper body to review
the problem and recommended that Mr. Miller first contact the Village
Manager and meet with him to discuss the problem.
There being no further business, Chairman Weibel adjourned the meeting
at 10:20 P.M.
Respecfully submitted
Lynn Kloster
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 5-Z-90, 6 -SU -90,
Hearing Date: January 25, 1990
and 7-V-90
February 1, 1990
PETITIONER:
Blue Jay Building Corporation
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
400 East Rand Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
January 9, 1990
REQUEST:
A rezoning from R-1 Single -Family, to R-3
Multi -Family Residential; a Special
Use/Planned Unit Development in order to
construct 24 townhomes of 8.8 dwelling units
per acre; and a variation from the P.U.D.
requirement to allow a 10 foot setback from the
cul-de-sac bulb to the property line, instead of
the required 20 foot.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Barbara Phillips, 516 Eastman Ct.
Brian Cousins, 405 E. Highland
John Michaels, 505 Highland
This case has been continued from the January 25, 1990 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting.
Chairman Gil Basnik introduced this case as being a rezoning from R-1 Single -Family, to
R-3 Multi -Family Residential; a Special Use/Planned Unit Development in order to
construct 24 townhomes of 8.8 dwelling units per acre; and a variation from the P.U.D.
requirement to allow a 10 foot setback from the cul-de-sac bulb to the property line.
Attorney John Made, of 5744 Cermak Road, Cicero, Illinois, represented the petitioner,
Blue Jay Builders. He gave a brief report on the successful developments in the
surrounding suburbs, constructed by his client, Mike Lmacco, owner of Blue Jay Builders.
ZBA-5-Z-90, ZBA-6-SU-90, ZBA-7-V-90
February 1, 1990
Page 2 of 2
He stated Blue Jay Builders is proposing to construct a 24 unit townhouse project with a
density of 8.8 per acre, at 400 East Rand. He explained that a rezoning to a multi -family
designation is sought because of the configuration of the lot which prevents construction of
single family or commercial on this lot. A single family project would require a total of 306
feet in width, and this lot is 198 feet wide. A commercial development would require more
frontage width on Rand Road than what is available. He stated that an offer was made to
purchase the 88 foot wide lot to the south, but even if they had been successful, it would
not have been sufficient for either single family or commercial development. He gave a
brief description of the types of units and submitted renderings showing the facades of the
buildings.
Darryl Mayo, Architect with Robert H. Jessen & Assoc., 4242 Kirchoff Rd., Rolling
Meadows, was sworn in and confirmed the proposed type of construction and number of
units. He added that they took a survey of the character of the neighborhood and then
developed a design compatible with the environment.
John Schuller, Engineer with Applied Engineering,4242 KirchoffRd., Rolling Meadows, was
sworn in and testified that they had expected to tie into the Village storm sewer which
handles the single family homes to the east. However, they had been informed that the
sower does not have the capacity to handle the water. He stated that they will investigate
tying into the State storm sewer on the far side of Rand Road or the Village sewer to the
northwest of the their property. If a detention area will have to be provided on site, then
the developer is agreeable to eliminate the necessary units on the northwest comer of the
site for this detention area.
Paul Bednar, Planner, represented the Village. He commented briefly on the background
of the case, and affirmed that a multi -family development, such as this, is the most feasible
given the configuration of the lot. Mr. Bodnar then listed some issues regarding the
development which included: a) the possible need of a detention area in the northwest
corner of the parcel; b) shifting the cul-de-sac bulb to increase perimeter yard setback to
20 feet; c) a 5 foot wood fence along the east property line; d) a guard rail installed at the
east end of the cul-de-sac; e) the elimination of at least one unit on the northwest corner
to increase the building setback from Rand Road; and e) establishment of a Homeowner's
Association.
Mr. Mayo addressed the issues and stated the developer would be willing to install the
fence on.the-east side ofAhe property,and the.guard rail .on the east side end of the cul-
de-sac, and work with the Village Engineer to resolve the storm sewer issue. However, he
commented that they could not shift the cul-de-sac because it would greatly impact the end
unit.
Barbara Phillips, 516 Eastman Court, spoke on behalf of the residents on Eastman Court,
and stated that they would request the following:
ZBA-5-Z-90, ZBA-6-SU-90, ZBA-7-V-90
February 1, 1990
Page 3 of 3
1. 'A 6 foot fence rather than 5 ft. on the east side of the property line, and erect as
soon as possible to eliminate construction noise and debris.
2. A guard rail erected on the east side of the cul-de-sac and the cul-de-sac bulb shifted
further from the east property line.
3. A maximum of 22 units if detention pond is added.
4. A brick facade for the townhomes.,
5. Installation of a sidewalk on both sides of the street, possibly reduced in width.
6. Development of adjacent property at the same time, and if not possible, a covenant
added to ensure that no more than 8 units be developed on the property to the south.
Brian Cousins, 405 East Highland, was sworn in and stated he had two concerns. The first
was drainage and flooding since his home is lower than this property; and the second was
the appearance of the units facing his home. Some mention was made of having the fence
extend around the perimeter on north side of the development.
John Michaels, 505 Highland, commented that he did not agree that a fence should be
erected on the north side of the development, as many residents in his neighborhood
abutting this development have their own fences.
After some discussion, the Zoning Board members were all in agreement that this was a
favorable development for this parcel and that it would set a favorable tenor for the
remaining property on Rand. There was some discussion on obtaining the 88 foot parcel
to the north and the petitioner, Mike Losacco, mentioned that he had tried but the price
was exorbitant. He agreed to attempt further negotiations, but would not pay the price
requested. Discussion ensued concerning the height of the fence, sidewalks and final
determination of sewer connections. Chairman Basnik then reviewed the rezoning, special
use and variation standards.
Mr. Brettrager, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, moved to grant the petitioner's request, in Case
No. ZBA-5-Z-90, to rezone from R-1, Single Family, to R-3, Multi Family Residential on
the. subject -property, per. petitionees Exhibit No. L
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0
ZBA-5-Z-90, ZBA-6-SU-90, ZBA-7-V-90
February 1, 1990
Page 4 of 4
Mr. Petrucelli, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, moved to grant the petitioner's request in Case
ZBA-6-SU-90 for a Special Use/Planned Unit Development in order to construct 24
townhomes of 8.8 dwelling units per acre, per Exhibit.No. 1, subject to the following:
1. Engineering plan approved by the Village Engineer regarding final determination for
the sewer locations. If a detention pond is required on the property, two units may have
to be deleted.
2. Sidewalk installation to be determined by the staff and petitioner for recommendation
to the Village Board.
3. Revised landscape plan to include more plantings on the north and east sides and tree
preservation plan approved by Village staff.
4. A 6 foot high wood fence along the east property line, to be installed after public
improvements are completed.
5. A guard rail installed on the east end of the cul-de-sac.
6. On -street parking to be prohibited.
7. A minimum of 18 feet for driveway lengths.
8. Formation of a Homeowner's Association.
Upon Roll Call- AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
Mr. Brettrager, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, moved to grant the petitioner, in Case No.
ZBA-7-V-90, a variation from a the Planned Unit Development requirement to allow a 10
foot setback from the cul-de-sac bulk to the property line, per Exhibit No. 1.
Upon roll call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Brettrager, O'May,
Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 7-0.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary,
TO:
GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
I � �'
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
PJT
SUBJECT-
ZBA-S-Z-9b, ZBA-46-SU-", ZBA.7.V."
BLUE JAY BUILDERS
LOCATION:
400 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE-
JANUARY 17,19"
The applicant is requesting the following:
1. A rezoning from R-1, Single -Family, to R-3, Multi -Family Residential.
2. A special Use/Planned Unit Development in order to construct 24 townhomes,
which will be 8.8 dwelling units per acre.
3. A variation from the P.U.D. requirements in order to allow a 10 foot setback
from the cul-de-sac bulb to the property line, instead of 20 feet required by Code.
'e following comments were received from various departments:
1. The watermain must be looped. The preliminary engineering plans will have to
be revised accordingly. The watermain on -ate may be privately owned and
maintained.
2. The existing sanitary sewer south of this property is an 8" line (not 10" as
indicated on the plan). There should be a recapture agreement for tying into this
line.
3. The existing 36" storm sewer east of the property wasn't designed to accept
.4rainage from.this ,site.,mighty percent of this -site 4rainsto the morthwestcorner,
therefore, the drainage should be directed to the State storm sewer on Rand Road.
And I.D.O.T. permit will be required. It is possible that the State will not allow this
connection. In that case, a detention area must be provided on site.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
January 17, 1990
4. I.D.O.T. permits will be required for access to Rand Road The street pavement
width and cross section does -not meet Village standards 431' width back of curb to
back of curb required). Privately owned and maintained streets would be allowed
as shown.
5. Hydrant locations shall be determined by the Fire Department and Public Works.
6. The developer should make himself aware of all Development guarantees and
fees. A minimum of 3 street lights, 7 parkway trees and sidewalk on Rand Road will
be required.
7. The proposed grading at the east and north perimeters appears high, causing
concern of drainage onto adjacent property.
8. The configuration of the cul-de-sac bulb could be shifted slightly so that a 20'
setback is maintained.
9. Driveway slopes shall be a minimum of 2% and a maximum of 10%.
10. A plat of subdivision must be submitted with public utility and drainage
easements around the perimeter of the property. Any existing easements should be
shown on the plan.
k1
l.� ,. .
Blue Jay Builders has a contract to purchase two lots located on Rand Road and totaling
2.70 acres. These lots are zoned R-1 Single Family Residential. Adjacent to this parcel is
a single family neighborhood to the north and east. A single family home on a large lot
is located between this parcel and the Matz Funeral Home to the south. The Comprehen-
sive Plan identifies these parcels as general commercial/office. On the east side of Rand
Road, the Christian Life Church owns a large open parcel of land The applicant will be
appearing before the Plan Commission requesting to amend the Comprehensive Plan in
order to allow low-density multi -family residential.
Zoning
The main issue with this request is that of the appropriate zoning for this property. These
two parcels along with the adjacent properties are currently zoned R-1, Single Family. The
redevelopment of these two parcels must keep in mind the remaining large single family
lot to the south. Redevelopment of these subject parcels will have a direct bearing on the
-lot,to -south. 41e one Marge single family -lot to the -south will likely be�,redeveloped in
the near future. For this reason, the applicant prepared a c onceptual townhome plan for
this remaining lot, to demonstrate how a compatible development could be designed. It is
our understanding that this builder unsuccessfully attempted to purchase this lot for the
purpose of unifying the redevelopment of all three parcels along Rand Road.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
January 17, 1990
The two existing single family subdivisions to the north and tat will remain. Across Rand
Roadto the west, the Christina 11fe College undeveloped land could potentially be
developed in a number of different ways. Zoned as single family, this parcel could
undoubtedly be developed in such a manner, yet the potential for multi -family, or
commercial/office is a possibility.
Three options for redevelopment of these subject parcels are analyzed below:
M I= M11 -UrTIM'A*J R
This option would. be consistent with the adjacent neighborhoods. However, the two
parcels proposed for development by the petitioner do not have sufficient dimensions
for development with single family lots. A public street would require a 66' right-
of-way. Lots adjoining the street would require a 120' lot depth or 240' for lots on
both sides of the street. This would result in a total dimension of 306'. The subject
property has a north/south dimension of 198'. Acquiring the lot to the south would
provide 286', still short of the requirement for acceptable single family lots. Also
important, is the question of a small single family subdivision abutting Rand Road,
with this as the only access.
ME M-TENTE �-Tm- Ortimm-11TITTV TMITIRT7. ME TTIT, al,
This option seems to make some sense when considering the busy Rand Road
frontage. However, the depth of these three single family lots is much greater than
the frontage along Rand. 716 is a disadvantage for commercial development
especially when considering the 600' plus depth. It is not probable that a quality
commercial redevelopment would occur on these lots given the circumstances. More
importantly, commercial activity would be less compatible with the adjacent existing
single family subdivisions than residential redevelopment.
M ZT7 17M MW4=74 1. = mil r1r" ='r- MIT,"M =1771 171== 1=1 L",
A residential redevelopment is preferred on these parcels. Single family redevelop-
ment, as evidenced above, is not probable given the lot size parameters and location.
A multi -family project can fit on the parcels, is more marketable than single family
along Rand Road, acts as a buffer between the single family neighborhood and Rand
Road traffic, and, finally, is compatible with the existing residential. Ideally, this
development would include the lot to the south for the best design.
We believe that the above analysis justifies rezoning these parcels to allow multi -family.
The second main issue of this request is the specific site plan. Blue Jay Builders had
submitted several preliminary plans to the Village for our comments, and as a result, this
proposed P.UJ), site plan for 24 townhomes reflects most of our initial concerns.
Comments are itemized below:
Gil Basnik - Page 4
January 17, 1990
1. The number of units (24) may have to be reduced by two in order to accom-
modate a detention basin, as indicated in VUlw Simi comments.
2. By eliminating two units in the northwest corner, the buffer between Rand Road
and the nearest building increases favorably. A V minimum setback should be
provided.
3. The off-street parking areas are acceptable. On -street parking should be
prohibited because of the street width.
4. The density of 8.8 units per acre is reasonable. An R3/P.U.U. would allow up
to 14.8 dwelling units per acre. For your information, densities of recent townhouse
projects have been between 9.5 to 113 dwelling units per acre.
5. The distance between buildings is acceptable.
6. The access to Rand Road is located to maximize the separation from other access
points along Rand Road.
7. This layout affords the potential of interconnection to the south lot for future
redevelopment, (a Phase II of this townhouse project).
8. The cul-de-sac bulb could be shifted away from the east property line to increase
the perimeter yard setback to 20 feet.
9. Every effort should be made to save some of the existing trees on site. A tree
preservation plan will be required.
10. The preliminary landscape plan should be slightly revised adding plants along the
east property edge and increasing the size of the trees.
11. A five foot wood fence along the east property line will help block out headlight
glare and noise to the adjacent neighborhood. Six foot privacy fences for some
patios are reasonable.
12. A Homeownees Association should be in effect in which rules will prohibit
exterior alterations, additions, or modifications to the buil
13. Sidewalks are shown on both sides of the street. In our opinion, the elimination
of a sidewalk on one side will allow more front yard open space without creating a
problem for pedestrians.
14.-The.driveway lengths should be -no less than 18' { rreferably.20"4 from the garage
to the street. This length is consistent with other recent townhouse developments.
15. A guard rail should be installed at the east end of the cul-de-sac. This could
prevent the unlikely occurrence of an automobile driving onto the lot to the east.
Gil Basnik - Page 5
January 17, 1990
As a final summary on the application, it is important to point out that the proposed
townhome development is similar to Evergreen Woods, the Courts of St. John's, and village
Commons. These are recent townhomes that the community has found acceptable. This
application results in a slightly lower density than these other developments.
Also, after these parcels were designated for a commercial land -use with the revised
Comprehensive Plan, the planning staff prepared several land plans for the site. We
explored a commercial site plan, and a townhome design. It was our belief that the
towubome plan better fit the site, and was more compatible with adjoining properties. This
application is consistent with our conceptual designs for the site.
Accordingly, the staff recommends approval of the request.
PB:hg
CAF/
4/24/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
OF 1981 FOR THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEgT
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have adopted an Official Comprehensive Plan for the
Village of Mount Prospect as a guideline for development within the
Village; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that a need exists to amend the
official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect
adopted April 8, 1981 from time to time; and
WHEREAS, it has been deemed that in order for the official
Comprehensive Plan to reflect multi -family dwelling units
(townhomes) as the use of property generally located on the north
side of Rand Road approximately 101 feet south of Highland Avenue,
commonly known as 400 East Rand Road (to be known as Orchard Field
Townhomes), said Official Comprehensive Plan should be changed to
reflect the multi -family (townhomes) residential use; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 24, Article 11-12-7 of the Illinois
Revised Statutes, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount
Prospect held Public Hearings on February 21, 1990, and April 4,
1990, pursuant to proper legal notice being published in the Mount
Prospect Herald on January 23, 1990 and February 10, 1990, to
consider the proposed change in the Official Comprehensive Plan as
specified hereinabove; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees have considered the
proposed change in the Official Comprehensive Plan and have
determined that the best interests of the Village would be served
by amending the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount
Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby amend the Official Comprehensive Plan
of the Village of Mount Prospect with respect to property located
on the north side of Rand Road approximately 101 feet south of
Highland Avenue, generally known as 400 East Rand Road (Orchard
Field Townhomes) from General Commercial/office to Multi -Family
Residential/Low Density.
SECTION TWO: The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect
is hereby authorized and directed to file notice of the amendment
to the Official Comprehensive Plan of the Village of Mount Prospect
with the Cook County Recorder of Deeds, as provided by the Statutes
of the State of Illinois.
SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk of the Village of Mount Prospect
is hereby directed to published, in pamphlet form, said
0
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
400 East Rand Road
Page 2 of 2
Official Comprehensive Plan for the Village of Mount Prospect with
the amendment specified herein, pursuant to the Statutes of the
State of Illinois made and provided.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
CAF/
4/27/90
AI
11401IR
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16
ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT FOR KNOWN AS ORCHARD FIELD TOWNHOMES
GENERALLY LOCATED 400 EAST RAND ROAD
WHEREAS, Blue Jay Building Corporation (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioner) has requested modifications from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount for property generally known
as the orchard Field Subdivision (hereinafter referred to as
Subject Property) and legally described as follows:
That part of the North 110 feet of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E.
1/4 of Section 34, Townsip 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, lying west of the east 400 feet and
east of the center line of Rand Road, in Cook County, Illinois
also
South 88 feet of the north 198 feet (measured along aline
parallel to the east line of Section 34, Township 42 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian) of that part
of the Southesast quarter of the northeast quarter of Meridian
34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, lying Northeast of Rand Road (except the East 400
feet thereof) in Cook County, Illinois
",TV9
WHEREAS, the Petitioner is requesting a modification from the
Development Code to permit a detention basin as close as ten feet
(101) from the proposed buildings, rather than the required 75
feet; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modification from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property at their regular meetings on
February 21,1990 and April 4, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission has forwarded its recommendation
relative to the modification requested herein to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, and the
President and Board of Trustees have determined that the best
interests of the Village would be served in granting the
modifications requested herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a modification from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) to the Subject Property to permit a
detention basin ten feet (101) from the proposed townhouses being
developed as Orchard Field Townhomes.
SECTION THREE: Except for the modification from the Development
Code granted herein, all other requirements of said Development
Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Modification from hapter 16
orchard Field
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS;
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
'1990.
CAF/
4/26/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
R-1 TO R-3 (MULTI -FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT
A5 IT PERTAIES TO THE QROMD FIELD TOWNHOMES
WHEREAS, Blue Jay Builders (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner),
has filed an application to rezone the property commonly known as
400 East Rand Road and generally located 101 feet south of Highland
Avenue (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) , legally
described as follows:
That part of the North 110 feet of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E.
1/4 of Section 34, Townsip 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, lying west of the east 400 feet and
east of the center line of Rand Road, in Cook County, Illinois
also
South 88 feet of the north 198 feet (measured along aline
parallel to the east line of Section 34, Township 42 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian) of that part
of the Southesast quarter of the northeast quarter of Meridian
34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, lying Northeast of Rand Road (except the East 400
feet thereof) in Cook County, Illinois
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from R-1 (Single Family Residential) District to R-3 (Multi -family
Residential) District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 5-Z-90) before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
January, 1990 and February 1, 1990 pursuant to due and proper
notice thereof having been published in the Mount Prospect Herald
on the 9th day of January, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA
5-Z-90 and have determined that the best interests of the Village
of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BIL THE PRESIDENT AND BOAPJj OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this ordinance to
an R-3 (Multi -Family Residential) District.
MTION FOUR' This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
ZBA 5-Z-90
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
4/27/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS 400 EAST RAND ROAD AND GENERALLY
LOCATED 101 FEET SOUTH OF HIGHLAND AVENUE
WHEREAS, Blue Jay Builders (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property
commonly known as 400 East Rand Road and generally located
approximately 101 feet south of Highland Avenue (hereinafter
referred to as the Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
That part of the North 110 feet of the S.E. 1/4 of the N.E.
1/4 of Section 34, Townsip 42 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, lying west of the east 400 feet and
east of the center line of Rand Road, in Cook County, Illinois
also
South 88 feet of the north 198 feet (measured along aline
parallel to the east line of Section 34, Township 42 North,
Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian) of that part
of the Southesast quarter of the northeast quarter of Meridian
34, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal
Meridian, lying Northeast of Rand Road (except the East 400
feet thereof) in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 6 -SU -90) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
January, 1990 and February 1, 1990, pursuant to proper legal notice
having been published in the Mgunt Prospect Heral!ft on the 9th day
of January, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the
following ordinance regarding the subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of. -Tri -tees of the. Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the Planned Unit Development being the subject
of this Ordinance herein shall be constructed pursuant to the site
plan dated 2/14/90, a copy of said Site Plan is attached hereto
and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A".
SECTION THREE: That the Planned Unit Development being the subject
of this ordinance permits the construction of 22 townhomes,
resulting in 8.8 dwelling units per acre.
SECTION FOUR: That development of the Planned Unit Development is
0
ZBA 6 -SU -90
Page 2 of 2
subject to the following:
1. Engineering plans approved by the Village Engineer.
2. Sidewalks to be installed on both sides of the street.
3. Revised landscape plan to include more plantings on the north
and east sides and tree preservation plan approved by Village
staff.
4. A six foot (61) high wood fence along the east property line,
to be installed after public improvements are completed,prior
to issuance of any building permits.
5. A guard rail installed on the east end of the cul de sac
6. On -street parking to be prohibited.
7. A minimum of eighteen feet (181) for driveway lengths.
8. A brick facade required for the buildings.
9. Formation of a Homeowner's Association.
10. A ten foot (101) setback from the cul de sac bulb to the
property line.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of , 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
EH/CAF
4/11/90
4/26/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE IV OF CHAPTER 10 OF
THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Article IV entitled "Revocation or Denial" of
Chapter 10 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended in its entirety; so that hereinafter said
Article,IV of Chapter 10 shall be and read as follows:
if ARTICLE IV
REVOCATION OR DENIAL
Sec. 10.401. Procedure
Sec. 10.402. Notice of Action Against License, Procedure
For Hearing
Sec. 10.403. Appeal Procedure
See. 10.401. Procedure.
Any such license contemplated or issued under Article I of
this Chapter may be suspended up to sixty (60) days or revoked
by the Village Manager, or an application for issuance of
renewal of such license may be refused by the Village Clerk,
if either determines:
A. That the application of the applicant or license holder
contains any false, fraudulent or misleading material
statement; or
B. That the applicant or license holder has made any false,
fraudulent or misleading material statement, or has been
convicted of perpetrating a fraud upon any person,
whether or not such fraud was perpetrated in the course
of conducting any business in the Village, or that the
applicant or license holder has committed a felony; or
C. That the applicant or license holder has conducted any
activities directly related to his business in the
Village in an unlawful manner or in such a manner as to
constitute a breach of the peace or a menace to the
health, safety or general welfare of the public.
D. That the applicant or license holder has suffered a
revocation or refusal to issue or renew such license by
any state, municipality or licensing authority.
See. 10.402. Notice of Action Against License, Procedure
for Hearing.
A. Notification. The. applicant or licensee shall be
notified of a determination to revoke or refuse issuance
or renewal of a license by the Village Manager. This
notice shall inform the applicant of the right to request
a hearing before the Village Manager regarding the
proposed action.
Chapter 10
Page 2 of
Additionally, the notice shall contain the reasons for
the revocation, suspension or refusal to issue or renew.
Such notice shall be personally served or mailed, postage
prepaid, to the applicant or license holder, as the case
may be, at his last known address and shall provide such
applicant with the right to request a hearing before the
Village Manager involved within eight (8) days following
the date such notice was personally delivered or placed
in the mail. If no such request for a hearing is
received the Village Manager's determination shall become
final.
B. Setting of Hearing. The Village Manager - shall set a
place and date for the hearing and shall notify the
applicant or license holder of said place and date of
said hearing. The initial date for hearing shall be no
more than twenty-one (21) days after the written request
for a hearing is made.
C. Right to Counsel. The applicant or license holder shall
have the right to be represented at such hearing by legal
counsel.
D. Decision of Village Manager. At the conclusion of the
hearing, the Village Manager shall issue a written
decision and findings of fact and shall mail same to the
applicant or license holder. The decision and findings
of fact shall be mailed within five (5) days following
the conclusion of the hearing or the receipt of any
transcript thereof, whichever is the latest to occur.
Sec. 10.403. Appeal Procedure.
Any applicant or license holder aggrieved by the action of the
Village Manager in refusing to issue any license subject to
this Article or in suspending or revoking any license already
issued shall have the right to appeal to the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village.
A. Such appeal shall be made to the Village Board, or
designated person, within seven (7) days after the notice
of said decision of the Village Manager has been mailed.
The appeal shall contain a written statement setting
forth the grounds for appeal. No applicant or license
holder may appeal to the Village Board unless a timely
request for a hearing before the Village Manager, as set
forth in Sec. 10.402, has been made by said applicant or
license holder.
B. The President and Board of Trustees of the Village shall
set a time and place for a hearing on such appeal and
notice of such hearing shall be given to the appellant
in the manner provided in Section 10.402.
C. The appellant shall have the right to be represented at
such hearing by legal counsel.
D. The decision and Order of the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village following such appeal shall be
final and conclusive.
E. No license shall be revoked:
1. During the pendency of an appeals before the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village, nor
Chapter 10
Page 3 of 3
2. While litigation is pending in any court challenging
the decision of the President and Board of Trustees,
nor
3. While any appeal is pending from any court's action,
overriding or reversing the Board's action, nor
4. During the time within which such appeals from a
court's action can lawfully be taken. 11
SECTION TWO: 'That all Ordinances and Resolutions or parts thereof
which are in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are, to
the extent of such conflict, expressly repealed.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Village of c.Icunt Prospect
,Mount Prospect, Illinois
A
L
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM V
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MAY 8, 1990
SUBJECT: PROSPECT HIGH SCHOOL'S REGULATIONS ON TOBACCO
PRODUCTS ON SCHOOL PROPERTY
Attached is a response from Prospect High School indicating their policy on tobacco
products. I believe it is very clear that they do not allow any kind of products by any
of their students on any of their properties.
JOHN FULTON DI ON
JFD/rcw
attachment
TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT 214
PROSPECT HIGH SCHOOL
801 West Kensington Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Telephone: 255-9700
STEPHEN D. BERRY
Superintendent
JOHN W ASHENFELTER
Principal
GARY L. TJARKS
Associate Principal
JAMES N. WICKLUND
May 3., 1990
Assistant Principal
for Instruction
MICHAEL P. STEVENS
Director of
Student Services
Dear Ms. Wintercorn,
JAMES J. KUNNEN
Director of
Per our phone conversation enclosed please find
Student Activities
the smoking policy for Prospect High School.
LINDA L. JENEWEIN
Dean at Students
If you have any further questions please contact
DIVISION HEADS
Ms. Jenewein�our Dean of Students.
PATRICIA J. BAUDENDISTEL
English and Fine Arts
GARY L. BROONAN
Social Science and
Foreign Language
8. SMOKING
MARY LOU HUNDT
Health, Physical Education
and Drivers Education
The Surgeon General of the United States has determined
that smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease, and
ROLLIN D. POSTER
Mathematics and Science
emphysema. Students are not permitted to smoke on the
campus, anywhere in the school building, or at any school
DONALD J. ROBINSON
Practical Arts and
function. Using tobacco of any type, in any manner, is
Computer Education
prohibited at all times. This includes chewing, smoking
(cigar, cigarette or pipe) or holding a cigar, cigarette or
pipe, lit or unlit.
Smoking or chewing of tobacco is also prohibited on ALL SCHOOL BUSES.
Repeated offenses will result in suspension from school. Violations of
this policy will result in the following:
1. First ollense: A Saturday detention or in -school suspension.
2. Second offense: Two Saturday detentions or, two days in -
school suspension or a combination of the two.
3. Third ollense: Parent conference and three Saturday
detentions or three days in -school suspension.
4. Subsequent offenses: Minimum of three days out-of-school
suspension.
Offenses are cumulative throughout a student's enrollment in a District
214 school.
An Equal Employment and Equal Education Opportunity Agency"
EH/CAF
4/5/90
4/11/90
4/26/90
5/9/90
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 11.102.E entitled "Rules and
Definitions" of Article I of Chapter 11 (Merchants, Businesses,
Occupations and Amusements) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by adding thereto in proper
alphabetical sequence the following; so that hereinafter said
Section 11.102.B shall include the following:
TOBACCO PRODUCTS: Any substance containing tobacco leaf,
including, but not limited to, cigarettes,
cigars, pipe tobacco, snuff, chewing
tobacco, or dipping tobacco.
VENDING MACHINE: Any mechanical, electric, or electronic,
self-serving device which, upon insertion
of money, tokens, or any other form of
payment, dispenses tobacco products. 11
SECTION TWO: That Chapter 11 entitled "Merchants, Businesses,
Occupations and Amusements" of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by creating an entirely new
Article XXXVII entitled "Sale of Tobacco Products", so that
hereinafter Article XXXVII of Chapter 11 shall be and read as
follows;
ARTICLE XXXVII
SALE OF TOBACCO
Sec. 11.3701. License Required
Sec. 11.3702. Application
Sec. 11.3703. License Fee
Sec. 11.3704. Prohibited Sales or Delivery
Sec. 11.3705. Signage Prohibiting Sales to Minors
Sec. 11.3706. Purchase By Minors Prohibited
Sec. 11.3707. Possession By Minors Prohibited
Sec. 11.3708 Certain Distributions Prohibited
Sec. 11.3709. Vending Machine
Sec. 11.3710. Responsibility for Agents and Employees
Sec. 11.3711, Suspension; Revocetion of License, Fines, Costs
Sec. 11.3712. Use of Premises After Revocation
Sec. 11.3713. Penalties
Sec. 11.3701. License Required. It shall be unlawful for any
person, firm or corporation to sell, give away,
deliver, possess with intent to sell at wholesale or retail,
possess with intent to give away or deliver for promotional
purposes, either retail or wholesale, any tobacco products
within the Village without first having obtained a license
therefore from the Village Clerk of the Village in the manner
provided in Chapter 10 of this Village Code.
Chapter 11
Page 2 of
Sec. 11.3702. Application. A written application for a
license hereunder shall be made in writing to
the Village Clerk and shall be processed in accordance with
the requirements set forth in Chapter 10 of this Village Code.
Sec. 11.3703. License Fee. The license fee for a tobacco
dealer's license shall be as set forth in
Section 11.3410 of this Chapter.
Sec.11.3704. Prohibited Sales or Delivery. It shall be
unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to sell,
offer for sale, give away, or deliver tobacco products to any
person under the age of eighteen (18) years of age.
Sec. 11.3705. Signage Prohibiting Sales to Minors. Signs
informing the public of the age restrictions
provided in this Article XXXVII shall be posted by every
licensee within one foot (11) of every display of tobacco
products, on every vending machine which offers tobacco
products for sale and at each cash register or other point of
purchase on the premises. Each such sign shall state:
'THE SALE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS TO PERSONS UNDER
EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS OF AGE IS PROHIBITED BY LAW
VIOLATIONS SHOULD BE REPORTED TO THE VILLAGE
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH COORDINATOR, 870-56751
Said sign(s) shall be plainly visible and shall measure at
least eight and one-half inches (8-1/211) in height and eleven
inches (1111) in width. Lettering on said sign shall be at
least one inch (111) in height. Said signs shall also inform
the public that the Village Environmental Health Coordinator
is to be contacted should the law be violated.
Sec. 11.3706. Purchase By Minors Prohibited. It shall be
unlawful for any person under eighteen (18)
years of age to purchase tobacco products, to misrepresent
their identity or age, or to use false or altered
identification for the purpose of purchase tobacco products.
Sec. 11.3707. Possession By Minors Prohibited. It shall be
unlawful for any resident of the village of
Mount Prospect under eighteen (18) years of age to possess any
tobacco products within the Village of Mount Prospect.
Sec. 11.3708. Certain Distributions Prohibited. It shall
be unlawful for any licensee or any person in
the business of selling or otherwise distributing, promoting
or advertising tobacco products, or any employee or agent of
any such licensee or person in the course of such licensee's
business, to deliver tobacco products to any person on any
right-of-way, playground, park, or other, property owned by the
Village, any school district, any park district, or any public
library.
Sec, 11.370?.- Vnnflir- W -hires,
A. It shall be unlawful for any licensee to sell or offer
for sale, give away, deliver or to keep tobacco products
with the intention of selling, giving away, or delivering
such products by use of a vending machine, unless the
vending machine is fully within the sight of an employee
at all times. The vending machine must be equipped with
a manual, electric, or electronic locking device
controlled by the licensee for the purpose of preventing
its operation by persons under eighteen (18) years of age
when the licensee or an employee observes such attempted
operation. It is the obligation of the licensee to
assure that the vending machine is within sight of any
Chapter 11
Page 3 of 4
employee at all times. If a person under the age of
eighteen (18) years of age purchases a tobacco product
from a vending machine on the licensed premises, the
licensee shall be deemed guilty of prohibited sale or
delivery under Section 11.3707 of this Article.
B. The following premises are exempt from Section 11.3711.A:
1. Those premises including taverns and cocktail
lounges where access by persons under eighteen (18)
years of age is prohibited by law.
Premises where the public is generally not permitted
and where vending machines are strictly for the use
of employees of a business located at such premises.
See. 11.3710. Responsibility for Agents and Employees. Every
act or omission of whatsoever nature
constituting a violation of any of the provisions of this
Article by any officer, director, manager, or other agent or
employee of any licensee, shall be deemed and held to be the
act of such licensee; and such licensee shall be punished in
the same manner as if such act or omission had been done or
omitted by the licensee personally.
Sec. 11.3711. Suspension; Revocation of License, Pines,
Costs.
A. The Village President shall be charged with the
administration of this Article. The Village President
may suspend or revoke any license according to the
procedures set forth in Article IV of Chapter 10 of this
Village Code providing for license suspensions and
revocations by the Village President. In lieu of
suspension or revocation of a license, the Village
President may levy a fine of the licensee. The fine
imposed shall be not less than fifty dollars ($50.00) nor
more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each
violation. Each day on which a violation continues shall
constitute a separate violation. A licensee may appeal
a fine on the same manner as a revocation or suspension
in the same conditions set forth in Article IV of Chapter
10 of this Village Code.
B. Any licensee who requests a hearing on a violation of
this Article, and for which the Village President upholds
the finding of a violation, shall pay to the Village the
costs of the hearing on such violation. The Village
President shall determine the costs incurred by the
Village for said hearing, including, but not limited to:
court reporter's fees, the colt of transcripts or
records, attorney's fees, the cost of preparing and
mailing notices and orders, and all other miscellaneous
expenses incurred by the Village. These costs shall be
in addition to any fine assessed against the licensee.
C. The licensee shall p4y said costs to the Village within
thirty (30) days of notification of the costs by the
Village President. Failure to pay said costs within
thirty (30) days of notification shall be cause for
immediate revocation of the license. No hearing as set
forth in this Article shall be necessary for revocation
for failure to pay hearing costs.
Chapter 11
Page 4 of
Sec. 11.3712. Use of Premises After Revocation. When any
license shall have been revoked for any cause,
no subsequent license shall be granted to said licensee for
a period of six (6) months thereafter for the conduct of the
business of selling tobacco products as defined in this
Chapter in the premises in the revoked license.
Sec. 11.3713. Penalties. Nothing herein shall prevent the
Village from proceeding against a licensee in
the Circuit Court in lieu of administrative proceedings. Any
person found guilty of violating any provisions of this
Article shall be fined not less than fifty dollars ($50.00)
nor more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each
offense."
SECTION TWO: That all Ordinances and Resolutions or parts thereof
which are in conflict with the provision of this Ordinance are, to
the extent of such conflict, expressly repealed.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE III OF CHAPTER 19
ENTITLED "HEALTH REGULATIONS" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE, IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Article III of Chapter 19 of the Village Code
of Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by
inserting thereto a new Section 19.307 "Feeding of Animals", by
renumbering Sections 19.307, 19.308, 18.309 and 19.310; so that
hereinafter said Article III Chapter 19 shall include the
following:
of Sec. 19.307. Animals causing Damage or Health Hazard. it
shall be unlawful for any person to conduct any activity or create
a condition on any property, that attracts animals including birds
and insects, in a manner or in numbers that causes damage to the
property of others or a hazard to the public health.
Sec. 19.308. spitting. It shall be unlawful to spit or
expectorate on any public sidewalk or other public place, or on the
floor or walls of any store, theater, hall, public vehicle or other
place frequented by the public or to which the public is invited.
See. 19.309. Prohibited Acts. It shall be unlawful to commit
or do any act which endangers the public health or results in
annoyance or discomfort to the public.
Sec. 19.310. Nuisances. Abatement. It shall be unlawful for
any person to permit or maintain the existence of any nuisance on
any property under his, her or its control. The Chief of Police
and the Health Officer are each hereby authorized to abate any such
nuisance existing in the Village, whether such nuisance is
specifically recognized by Ordinance or not.
See. 19.311. Penalty. Any person violating any provision of
this Article shall be fined not less that fifty dollars ($50.00)
nor more than five hundred dollars ($500.00) for each offense, and
a separate offense shall be deemed committed on each and every day
during or on which a violation occurs or is permitted to continue."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village clerk
N
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
1990.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PR01'PECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
QVID11030141
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager 1 -'6�
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-24-V-90, David Mills
LOCATION: 1631 Oneida Lane
DATE: May 9, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for Village Board consideration their
recommendation on an application filed by David Mills of 1631 Oneida Lane. The
application was filed to allow a 64" wide service walk in a required side yard. Mount
Prospect Zoning Ordinance permits a 36" walk.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of April 26. Mr. Mills explained
that he had installed the sidewalk as a method to keep rainwater away from his foundation,
and was unaware of the maximum width of 36". The permit was applied for and issued to
a contractor. He stated that the walk does not have an adverse effect on the neighborhood,
as it is not visible from the street. He also pointed out that the neighbor's home is 22'
away.
The Zoning Board discussed the request, and noted that a permit for a 36" walk had been
obtained, but that the contractor had exceeded the limitations of the permit. The Zoning
Board also believed that the walk would not adversely effect the neighbor's home, due to
it being screened by a fence, and the 22' separation between structures. Accordingly, the
Zoning Board recommends by a 5-0 vote that the application be approved."
DMC:cl
.�.�
Cr.
cpN `, IAC i t
PATIc)Rvtcr
Wr�ti K
`E►GFl�otz
s GARAGE
L �� s
3� 3
w1 = 3'-0
r-
TOTAL
to
w 5
C�
N$c-Rv�cE
WAL-K o'- 8 R
's 3ou- H
LINE
SITS PL A W
GATE
o/
Chi!
�► EivsNES
113.0
/✓aTE u ' pfeRvlous
SURFACE Cov&RvNGE
INCLUbING NEW wALK
. 4r'lce
/Vo.
Aof
/
t M
Nt-
7 1IRL-
�Z
0 1
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZDA CASE NO. 24-V-90 Hearing Date: April. 26, 1990
PETITIONER: David & Diane`tills
SUBJECT PROPERT`�':
1631 Oneida
PUBLICATTON D.\77:
April 10, 1990
RFQ
se-
---ide sern.-Ice e.ail- 'th
in the side yard instead of
36** as allowed by Code.
7-RT7-Z7.,--
i 1 b e rt B a s n I rk , 4h a i -_::an
RDnald Cassily
Peter'amen annc n
Len Petrucelli
'Robe7t Breftrager
Marilvn 0'%13V
A B S E, x" T
prothers
•j2- '7-71'71'�F I; IT V
7- S 77-
7'. k PT 1 E S Fran!t Rossi, 162QOneida
"..airman Basnik, -*nt-rodulced this case stating that the
applicants are requesting a variation from Section
14-110,2.D.4 t.:, allow a 64" wide ser% -ice -%,:alk within the side
yard
instead of 36",
The petitioner, Da :d Mills, 1631 Oneida Lane, presentedt'—
case stating the request eliminate the rainfall corning
into his house. Mr. Mills also stated that he had a 230 -volt
power line was exposed when the previous sidet,7alk- tcas
-,Pmn,.'ed- His request is t-) h,pefully prevent the tater damage
`.:) 'he house and possible shock f-cri the power line. He
be":eves the wider the wall' -way would Primarily direct
rainerater awa<- from his dome.
Tlau'.Iednar, Planner representing the VI'lage, noted that the
permit that was issued specifically el.cluded the extension of
2'1". The ,:a11kt,-ay was only to be 36" wide: He also noted "hat
the lot coverage is at. 42% which is below the Village
requirment of 45% . ?aul also commmented that there is also a
51 fence which screens the slab from the street causing no
negative impact on the neighborhood.
Chairman Basnik questioned th=� name s -f t!ie contacter. `i~.
`tills stated that It was� Ray Pes-zele. cf Des Plaines, T-li. The
Petitioner stat -1 he .-a'le,14 the ',-iilage and spoke t,� Eomeone
ZEA -24-V-90
Apr"! 26,1990
Page 2 of 2
and 2ould not recall the name but was told he could -�ut a
servie walk in. Mr. Cassidy felt it was a misunderstanding
on th= c,-ntartors part. Chairman Basnik asked that a letter
be se... contactor reminding him to PU I , I permit. Ln the
vut_,re. Mr. Brettrager questioned the drainage on the
prnpertv. Chairman Basnik asked Paul Bednar if the Village
was at,;are of the drainage. Paul stated that the Engineering
Dept. had Inspec'ted and noted that the slab is 6" hilg--r than
the grade and very close to the propprt-..- line.
Frank Rossi, 1629 Oneida, a of the pet. 4t:Dner
said that he had no problems u7ith the ser-icewalk and acted
the petitioner ^_leaned up a big mess in the 'backyard.
7111,-Alrman Sasnik ask -ed if the neighbor that this could affect
"ne s1l.ula—.-n, "r. MiIIQ stated Ine h_--,
nv p r:- e:I
'ha: --,.,-.n '_asnih en'er'ained a rn.oti,).. to gran' the .-ar 1 a t i on
`Ih additional - th,� condition that no addA. - - s t ru c r e s be, put on
"�p IT:' . Must go before the Vlllage Board May 15, 1-0-00.
-as-
31 - - moved, se-._on,led b.-, Mr. Er-_--ttrager, moved tj gz-an,
.r 1 !"a' AYES: Lannon, Cassidy, Bret trage r,
Pasr:%
,4
NAYS: None
`!cticned carried by a vote of 5-0.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
"-4LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL*.7
PLANNING AND ZONNG DEPARTMWA4T
Mount Prospect, Iftols
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOA F APP EAL# CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-24V-90, DAVID AND DIANE MILLS
LOCATION: 1631 ONEIDA LANE
DATE: APRIL 17,19"
REQUM
The applicants are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.D.4 to allow a 64" wide
service walk within the side yard instead of 36" as allowed by Code.
39LJAGE STAFF COMMNTS
The Inspection Services Department notes that a permit was issued in April 11, 1989 for
the replacement of a concrete stoop on the side of the house. It was specifically noted on
this permit that the walk/patio in this area was not to be replaced, since it didn't meet
Code. Mr. Mills has since had the entire area replaced with a concrete surface in violation
of the permit On December 15, 1989, the Inspection Services Department posted a
violation notice on the house requiring the situation be resolved. A copy of the permit site
plan is included. The Engineering Department has inspected the concrete slab and notes
that it is 6" higher than the grade at the property line which may alter drainage.
The Mills live in a single family neighborhood. It appears they had an existing concrete
slab extending from the side of the house to the east property line. A permit was issued
last summer, for replacement of the stoop and a 3 foot wide concrete walk. In violation
of this permit, the concrete slab was replaced just as it had existed before. Mr. Mills now
requires a variation from the Zoning Code in order to allow him to keep the 64" wide
service walk Otherwise, a portion of it must be removed. Mr. Mills should establish a
hardship and offer an explanation as to why the, permit was disregarded.
The site plan submitted by Mr. Mills accurately shows the allowed 3 foot wide service walk
(W1 on the plan) and the extra 2'4" walk (indicated as W2). W2 is the area for which Mr.
Mills requires a variation. The total impervious lot surface coverage is approximately 42%
which falls within our Code requirements.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-24-V-90
April 17, 1990
This entire concrete service walk is enclosed by a 5 foot high wood fence. It is difficult, if
not impossible, when viewing from the street, to know that this area is all paved. It is only
apparent when looking over the fence or when in the yard itself For this reason, there is
not a significant visual impact on the neighborhood as a result.
In summary, Mr. Mills must establish a hardship for the extra wide service walk. Since it
is already existing, we were able to analyze the visual impact'it has on the neighborhood
and felt it to be insignificant. The fact that Mr. Mills had this walk replaced in violation
of, the special conditions attached to the permit, warrants special consideration by the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
PB:hg
y I� I
SAN
$�.ew►c+�t�.b V '.� ♦'��►+k„�,„ti. ,'�►"�,'Ih'�"'w+Gir � Q1�C'�► . � 4 "� ►'�:.
.�i.r..A«�►1'�.-�r�.a"""�,; Fati. �'+'br,-ttoN►C�►� ,..s^Q�.. "�»^t�oo� 'ca
`�•"�"r Cir �1 E.� ,� �.
;a. 4zk
.
♦ W,S ,.v
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRO`sSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager Yr _
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-26-V-90, Elizabeth H. Magnone
LOCATION: 2234 West Lincoln
DATE: May 8, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for your consideration their recommendation on
an application filed by Elizabeth H. Magnone. The application was filed to allow a second
driveway, being a circular driveway, and a variation to permit a 32' driveway to serve an
existing three -car garage.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of April 27. Mrs. Magnone
stating that she is building a new home at 2234 West Lincoln, and that the circular driveway
would allow better and more direct access to the front door of the residence. She also
pointed out that the circular drive would provide sufficient guest parking, as Lincoln and
Hickory are unimproved streets in this area and not suitable for on -street parking.
In reference to the variation to allow a 32' driveway, it was explained that a 30' driveway
was approved with the three -car garage. At this time, Mrs. Magnone believes the 32' width
would better serve the garage, allowing improved maneuverability.
The Zoning Board discussed the request, and noted that this is an extremely large lot, and
that the two driveways would not adversely effect the. neighborhood. The Zoning Board
also agreed that the existing unimproved streets were not appropriate for parking, and that
the circular drive might serve to lessen congestion by providing off-street parking for the
residence.
Accordingly, the Zoning Board recommends by a 5-0 vote that the application be approved
DMC:c1
E
ILLINOIS, BEGINNING Al THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID EAST 1/2 RUNNING -THENCE EAST A , LONG THE SOUTH
LINE OF SAID EAST 1/2 16' FEET, THENCE NORTH PARALLEL WITH TH ',ST LINE OF SAID EAST 1/2 264
FEET, THENCE WEST PARALL IITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID EAST 165 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF
SAID EAST 1/2, IIIENCE SOU', ALONG THE WEST LINE OF EAST 1/2 264 FEET TO'THE PO4NT OF BEGINNING.
) 04 SOX MEAN'S THIS SURVEY WAS BEEN
E 8U CONNECTION WlYNA REAL ESTATE OR
AN
JCTIOWTRANIMCWN AND 13 NOT TO BE USED
ARE NOT TO U ASSUMED FROM SCALING
(9909049
feet
5040AV 11AW Of INE ARR)4 Or sec. 10
C^I At
—W4. IV
153 ...
INT Of N I N
8UMOING LINES AND EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN ONLY WHERE THEY ARE $0
RECORDED IN THE MAPS, OTHERWISE REFER TO YOUR Dit4p, OR ABSTRACT
Dock"Sof a fool am th6requive4al
In inch" ans tnetions thimsimi.
,01-16' 01 . Tfil, 306,
.02 - im, Cs.i- As:1.
M . 301V A7.2- AT.#*
I
At - 102' .25.3* JS 19r,
& OF x
,7 //7,& je
mel-
COMPARE ALL POINTS BEFORE BUILDING BY SAME AND AT ONCE
ANY DIFFERENCE
State of Illinois
County of Cook I SA
ft CERTIFIED SURVEY 00. do hereby Certify that
surveyed the above Described Prop" and that the plat
drawn is a Correct representation of said survey.
L�> " = A- %
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASr_ \:O. 26-V-90
Hearing Date: -April 26, 1990
Elizabeth H. '.11agnone
4'231 West Lincoln
April 110, 1990
ar�atlons from: Section
14.3016.A.1 to allow a second
driveway -on the lot that being a
circular drive In front of the
home. -ode allows one'driveu:ay
per Section 11,3016.A.3 to
al log- a drivewa-F width of 32'
instead of 21' allowed by Code,
Variations have already been
granted per ordinance N,(.). !104
to allow a 30'wide drivewa.-..
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Robert Brettrager
Mar _l. O'.May
23rD'he7s
DIRTT'MIZ: Ed -opol, 1'4 Leonard Ln.
asn"k i-troduced this case stating that the
^' _cants a: -e rp,juesting a .-ar'
_at: from Section
tc allow a second on the lot that be-ne
a Jri+-e in frcnt of the home. Also, a variation from
5-"ec-.;_-n '4.3n116.A.3 to allow a drivet.ay width of 32' instead
-' 21' allo,:ed by code, noting variations have already been
_Z-irant,, _r C-T!_-nance .*o. 4104 tc allow a 1-01 wide drivewa,-
at this address.
The petiloner, Elizabeth Magnone, 2234 West Lincoln,
presented the case stating that the circular drive would. 1--e
easier access to the front door because the garage is on the
side of the '-reuse. She also stated that Lincoln Ave. is a
,."e-.,., narr,:�w street and parking on the street would cause
traffic pre)blems. The second variation requested was
p-eserted bn: Larry Me Kone, the builder for the homeowner,
stated that a variation was previously granted by ordinance
4101 to allow a 30' driveway. Mr. Me Kone noted the 32'
wade driveway would better serve the existing 3 car garage.
ZBA-26-V-90
April 26,1990
Page 2 of 2
Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, noted that the request
is for a Yery large home ?5000 square feetli He also stated
that 'here are some -ery large trees on the ist and
jAnsticne! if the cirTular drive would be more of a
I -... -- ---2, n in- tea A c f a ne a es a it.y. For tne _ .nd !-qu-est,
Ravi stated that this wculd be an amendment 'a the Crdinance
i 4104, and staff had no objections.
71 7np7l, 314 Lecnard Lane, stated that the .:sewas
four and a half feet above his land. Mr. TcpA also said
that water is going to come onto his fir rt' because of the
difference on the height of the foundation. Larry Mc Koie
stated tkat when the permit was issued the engineering plans
were apprcved by the Village. Chairman BasnA asked that a
meeting be scheduled with the Engineering Dept., LqrrF Mc
7nne and Mr.TQpol to clarify the situation. David Clements,
Director W FIRnning and Kning, said lne set up that
meeting.
Clairman Basnik then entertained a motion to grant the
variation on the circular driveway and the ameAment to the
Irdinance =4104 with no conditions. T'n—.- m--st st-i'll, appear
before the Village Scar:?.
Mr. 7-rett-"7ger mo,.ed, ti!-. Lannon seconded, m.,. -ed to grant
the MCKIn.
Upon RAI Call: AYES: Lannon, Cassidy, Petrunelli,
Brettrager, OM7, Basnik,
NAYS: None
•!-,,tion carried b,.- a, -,-,ate of 6-0.
�!ichelle 7homps�n
Recording Fecretar.,,.-
.o .
nANMG AM ZONWG r . rW
mom"Prospect,nubou
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OFAFF CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, P
SUBJECT: ZHA•26-V 90, ELIZABETH H. MAGNONE
LOCATION: 2234 "WEST LINCOLN
DATE: APRIL 17, 1990
REO
The applicant is requesting variations to the following Sections of the Zoning Code:
1. Section 143016.A.1 to allow a second driveway on the lot that being a circular
drive in front of the home. Cade allows one driveway per lot.
2. Section 143016.A3 to allow a driveway width of 32 feet instead of 21 feet
allowed by Code. Variations have already been granted per Ordinance No. 4104 to
allow a 30 foot wide driveway.
The lot should be resubdivided into a proper lot of record. Both Inspection Services and
Engineering suggest that a driveway leading to the garage should taper to 21 feet wide at
the curbline. It was also suggested that a culvert under the drive on hickory may be
needed so drainage is not blocked. Lastly, it was noted that a circular drive plus the drive
to the garage provides three access points to this one lot. They recommend eliminating the
circular drive. No other comments were received regarding this case.
Bic
Last Fall, Ms, Magnone received a special use permit for a three car garage and variations
for garage size and driveway width. Ordinance No. 4104 permits a 30 foot wide driveway
leading to the garage.
1 itTCat Reest
A very large home (5,000 square feet) is being completed on this one acre lot located at
the corner of hickory and Lincoln .Street.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-26-V-90
April 17, 1990
W Magnone is now proposing a second driveway on her property, that being a circular
drive in front of the home. A hardship must be established for this circular drive. In the
past, circular drives have been approved when the lot abuts a busy street. The main
purpose of a circular drive is to prevent cars from backing out onto busier streets. Ms.
Magnone does not have this safety issue present on her property, since she has access to
Hickory Street. In our opinion, a circular drive is not a necessity for this home.
It should also be noted that many mature trees are located in the front yard. Some of these
trees would have to be removed if the driveway were to be located as proposed on the site
plan. The front yard lot coverage approaches the maximum 25% allowed on an R -X Single
Family IoL Parking is allowed on both Lincoln and Hickory, however, both streets are
narrow, do not have curb and gutter, and on street parking is rarely, if ever, taken
advantage of in this neighborhood.
The second request of a 32 foot wide drive to the garage rather than 30 feet, as allowed
by previous Ordinance,should be justified. If indeed, a 32 foot width is required because
of the location of the garage doors, it will not have a negative impact upon the
neighborhood.
In summary, there may be personal preference considerations in having a circular drive lead
to the front door off of Lincoln Street, such as, easy accessibility to the front door and guest
parking off the street, however, none of these are actual hardships. In our opinion, circular
drives have normally been allowed for safety concerns when located on a busy street. This
particular lot is not in this type of situation and therefore, we do not recommend approval
of the circular drive. With regards to the 32 foot wide drive leading to the garage, it must
be justified by the petitioner, however, we do not expect any impact on the neighborhood,
if approved.
PB:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
SUBJECT: ZBA-28-Z-90, ZBA-29-SU-90, ZBA-30-V-90, Mr. John Kamysz
LOCATION: 720 East, Rand Road
DATE: May 8, 1990
The Zoning Board of Appeals transmits for Village Board consideration, their findings on
application filed by Mr. John Kamysz. The application was filed for a rezoning from a B-
3 to a B-4 District, a Special Use Permit for a drive-tbru fast-food restaurant, and perimeter
setback variations. Mr. Kamysz hopes to rebuild a restaurant at the site of the former
Honey Bee Restaurant.
The Zoning Board considered the request at their meeting of April 26, 1990. Mr. Kamysz
explained that this was the third hearing for redevelopment of his property, the most recent
being in March of 1989. At the last hearing, he had proposed only one driveway onto
Rand Road, satisfying concerns from the initial application, and increased the perimeter
setbacks as much as possible. This application was denied, primarily because of concerns
about traffic generated by the fast-food restaurant. Last year it was noted that a secondary
point of access through the parking lot of the Courtesy Home Center would work to solve
traffic concerns. Also last year, the setback variations were reviewed and approved.
Mr. Kamysz explained that at this time, he is proposing the same site plan, but with the
addition of a driveway to the Courtesy property. He believes that with this additional
access point, he has worked to resolve all the issues that were raised with the last
application. He noted that the building size, setbacks and parking were the same as the last
plan. The restaurant would be a small independent operation, featuring fast-food lunch and
dinner items.
The Zoning Board discussed the request, and noted the efforts made by the petitioner to
address earlier issues. The Zoning Board had the following concerns and observations:
1. The rezoning of the property to a B4 District could allow some future use of the
building such as an automobile oriented use or a higher traffic restaurant. The
Zoning Board noted that a B4 District is the only way to permit a fast-food
restaurant, and that the smaller size of this building would not lend itself to
conversion to a high volume use like a McDonald's.
ZBA-28-30 May 8, 1990
Page Two
2. The Zoning Board discussed the possibility of restricting left -turns in and out of the
site. However, it was believed that any such prohibition would place a hardship on
the restaurant operator.
The additional point of access at the rear of the site to the Courtesy parking lot
helps traffic flow.
The perimeter setback variations are reasonable considering the irregular shape of
the lot.
4. The menu board in the drive-thru aisle should be relocated to allow more stacking
of cars waiting to place orders.
After a thorough discussion, the Zoning Board of Appeals voted to approve the rezoning,
Special Use and setback variations to allow a fast-food restaurant to be constructed at 720
East Rand Road. Additional details are found in the attached minutes.
Lastly, it should be noted that a Plat of Consolidation for this property, and a restrictive
covenant for street light installation will be forthcoming to the Board.
DMC:cI
attachment
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 28-Z-90
Hearing Date: April 26,1990
29 -SU -90
PETITIONER:
John Kamysz
ST1_BjF_CT PROPER'"?":
720 E. Rand Road
DATE:
April 110, '99n
REQUEST:
Rezoning for this property
from B-3 to B-4 along with a
special ;:se in order to allow
a drive-thru, fast food rest-
aurant of 1,629 square feet.
Also requested are -variations
from: Sect_ -'^n 14.2002.A to
allow a :3.5' front ,;and
instead of 301 as required by
Code. Section 14.2002.B to
allot: a V side yard instead
of 10' as requires by Code.
Section 1.4.2002.0 to aliot.: a
3' rear and instead of 201 as
required by Code. Section
14.3012 to waive the
requirement for a 12'x 35'
de'livery loading space,
77SA MEI!BERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Rasnik, Ch
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
en Petruce-1-1i
'.Robert Dret'!*rager
Marilyn 0 -lay
ois Erc-thers
PAR'' -_7_S: ,K':o
airma- Basnik intrcducec_' this case stating that the
Ipplicant is re!7,uestng a rezoning for this property from
3-3 to B-4 along with a special use 4 n order to allow a
drive-thru, fast-food restaurant of 1,529 square feet.
Also requested are the folloc,:ing variations:
1. Set-2tion 14.21002-k to allow an 13.3" front yard instead
of 30' as required by Code.
2. Section 14.2002.8 to allow a 3' side, yard instead of
ZBA-28-Z-90
ZBA-29-SU-90
ZBA-30-V-90
April 26,1990
Page 22 of t
'0' as required by Code.
esti ,n 11.2002.0 to allow a 5' rear yard instead of
2f" as required by Code.
S�,Dn -.3012 'D way e t_�,.e requirement f,:;-- a
35' delivery loading space.
The petitioner, John Kamysz, 720 E. Rand Road, and the
Fet4ti-.�ners architect, Vincent ScavD, presented the case
as 'hls- be the
a bc.,
--e ,-arIa!-_:)ns. "Ir. Scavo ccMmented I'le
tHcught Lterns number one thru four were cleared up at the
I - I- I k m a e- ar
_:�-Iing Meeting, Chairman Basn� told hi P ul B . 'n
-:plain the reason for this req%Iest. �!r. Kamysz state_-,
he has purchased an additional 20' f, --.-)m Courtesy Home "enter
for ingress and egress at the rear of the propert.. He also
cstato,l T:ith the addlti'_�nal dri-.-�,Y�a earlier ccn,_-,err.S
,,bout ar—ess had been resolved. The one driveway has alread,.
been approved br !.D.O.T. for 241 from 106' which -_:as
previcusl?- proposed. Mr. Ramysz feels he has met a12 the
s a.._', I' s just w a i - g r a j) r r .al from t h e I a Z' e .
Paul 2e2na.-, Planner for the Village, stated the main --ncern
.s he -Iavinz -i !Duld increase 'raff'_
"s
-:-e than a si-' down, --esta,--rant. The deletion cf
the 1-Dal'ng zone would be sat ' isfaotor-- as long as del`veriez
are matie when no customers are there. Paul also stated in
referent= the variation requests th_it the Village B,;ard
denied the Special Use and -ezcnirg but appr.),.-ed tHe
variat;,ns. For that reascn, the petitioners have '.,L presen-.
their -ase again.
-Hairma:. Basnil,. asked the petitioner to address the pa--')-,.-n.:Y.
stated that r; --h the _ne on Rand F. ad 111-.e
parking ,:ruli- be 23 spaces. Mr. Pretrucelli questicne,-' the
number -ars in the dr;vfhr. I.ine :incluo.Ing the
board. 'Fe felt that ears t,:culd '-'-.-7: 111-:e drivewa.. and asked
the me -_,-board oculd be move�_i more eaSti,:ard to prevent
this occurring. Mr. Petruce-1-1i also commented on where the
st,,-rage was gc�:ng to be. Mr. Scavo -re-piled since there is
basement th�. storage would be ;.:-. the kitcher area but, c,7ou ld
,,!ad 1 %- n,,; t ? n a basement and ad.,� n,^ additional seating if the
V-'Ila.g& t'-culd approve. Mr. T-anncn quest`oned him as to wh% he
Ii -id not req -_est a variance for 'he basement. Mr. Scavo stated
the Vill',ge Ccde would require additional parking for the
basement area, and this could not be provided on this site.
ZBA-28-Z-90
ZBA-29-SU-90
ZBA-30-V-90
APRIL 26,1990
Page 3 of 4
Chairman Basnik questioned as to what kind of fast-food
restaurant business this was to be. W.:',jiam the
future tenant for the proposed bu;1,,g, stated it would be
lust 111:e an' other
fast-food establis'nmen, e-.--ept no
12snik a'so ere 'he
the or '.he -=,*-dc•,n part of the
restaurant. Mr. Kotsios said it would be on both. The
Chairman also asked if he had chosen a name and what the
hours would be, Mr. Kotsios stated he has not chosen a name
as of et and the hcurs will be Midas dht.
john !ic-n, ?nl N. addressej t`- 2,:ar_J concerns
on traffic. He feels that rezoning this parcel of land from a
13-3 to a B-4 would increase the traffic an Rand Road allowing
people to drive down Isabella causing not onl:.. traffic
problems but also safety issues.
Peter Schuster, 303 N. Wil -1 -Jam, addressed some questions to
the board. The approved driveway from I.D.O.T. would that be
strictly for in or out" He also questioned where it was to be
located on Rand Rd. As examples to the Board he suggested
that the Courtesv Rome Center should be used as the main
entrance as in the Mount Prospect Plaza for Browns Chicken
and Wendys at \orthpoint in Arlington Heights �,;hich are very
successful.
Mr. Lannon suggested that they lock J-1— a left turn only
conditlon into And out of Rand Road, Paul- interjected stating
' V 7
,that _.D.O.'r, had already approved the � 24dr-1 ' ewa -on Rand
Road and this would create a '*por:c 2'-cp" type of -,nter-
section. Mr. Lannon suggested a left turn only sign be put
up. Paul said that might solve the problem. Pa:_! also
clarified that the plan submitted sl i 1-fln t d fferent than
the Previously one submitted. The Sq,,�are 0-�c'az= on the plan
indicates 1703 square '^-,tage. 7!,ie
1629 square footage.
The Zoning B:-)ard -tenerally d-_*sci_;s
s-J. e :�.nd noted
that the
to the Co-urt�_z_- helped earlier
did not think a prohibition on turns would be
appropriate.
Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioners
request for rezoning of the property at 72c r, Rand Rd. from
`Sr. Cassidy- moved, seconded by -Mr. Brettrager to grant the
motion.
ZBA-28-Z-90
ZBA-29-SU-90
ZBA-30-V-90
April 26,1990 -
Page 4 of 4
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy,
Brettrager, O'May,.Basnik.
NAYS: None.
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
Chairman Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioners
request for a Special Upe to alloy a dKve-Gru, fast food
restaurant, sobjx-t to tho ;etitioner to cooperate with the
Village Staff.
Mr. Cassidy moved, Mr. Brettrager seconded. Mr. Brettrager
also asked for a review on the menu -board location. Mr.
Lannon asked for a review on the left turn restriction.
Upon Roll Call: %YES: Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brettrager,
O'May, Basnik.
VAYS: Lannon.
Motion carried by a vote of 5-1.
rhairmat Basnik entertained a motion to grant the petitioner
the following variations: Section 14.2002.A to allow a
,13.5' front yard. Section 14.2002.8 to allow a 3' side yard.
Ser -tion 14.2002.0 to allow a 5' rear yard. Section 14.3012 to
waive the requirement for a 12' x 35' delivery loading space.
.Mr. Brettrager moved, Mr. Lannon seconded to grant the
motion.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy,
O'May, Basnik.
I :AYS: None.
Motion carried by a vote cf 5-O*.
These cases must still appear before the Village Board.
Michelle Thompson
Recording Secretary
"If iLLAGE OF MOUNT moss&: T
K ANNWCs AND ZONING DEII RtTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APP CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER-'
SUBJECT: ZBA-28-Z-90, ZBA 29 -SU -90, ZBA-30.V.90, JOHN KAMYSZ
(FORMER HONEYBEE RESTAURANT SITE)
LOCATION: 720 EAST RAND ROAD
DATE: APRIL 18, 1990
RQZFST
The applicant is requesting a rezoning for this prop" from B-3 to B-4 along with a special
use in order to allow a drive-thru, fast-food restaurant of 1,629 square feet. Also requested
are the following variations:
1. Section 14.2002A to allow an 13.5' front yard instead of 30' as required by Code.
2. Section 14.2002.B to allow a 3' side yard instead of 10' as required by Code.
3. Section 14.2002.0 to allow a 5' rear yard instead of 20' as required by Code.
4. Section 14.3012 to waive the requirement for a 12'X35' delivery loading space.
V LLAGE STAFF CQMMNTS
In reviewing this application, several comments were noted by the different staff
departments.
1. LD.O.T. permits will be required for any work done on Rand Road right-of-way.
2. _ Grading and detention will have to be reviewed for the property. An interior
storm sewer system should be added eliminating sheet flow drainage onto Rand
Road.
3. New water and sanitary sewer service will be required depending upon volume
of water to be used. There is currently a 16" watermiain on the northeast side of
Rand Road
4. The handicap parking stalls as shown must not overhang into the drive-thru lane.
5. Engineering and building plans must be submitted for approval.
Gil Basnik - 2
April 18, 1990
6. All Development Code requirements must be met including sidewalks, parkway
trees, parking lot curbing, etc.
PLAhXN_Q AND ZONING COBDOM
Bg
As you may recall, Mr. Kamysz presented virtually this same plan to the Zoning Board of
Appeals one year ago. Two small changes have been made to last year's proposal. First,
the size of the building is now proposed at 1,629 square feet instead of 1,560 square feet.
Secondly, there is now an access drive connecting this property and the Courtesy parking
lot. The traffic flow from Rand Road in and out of this site was a major concern of both
Boards, last year. At last year's Zoning Board and Village Board hearings, it was noted by
several Board members that an additional access point into the Courtesy parking lot would
be of benefit to this proposal. The additional access drive was recently agreed upon by Mr.
Kamysz and the Courtesy Partnership, and was made a condition of the recent Courtesy
Home Center Planned Unit Development approval.
Please refer to the Planning and Zoning comments on the attached memo dated April 19,
1989 for a detailed analysis of this proposal. Most of the comments in this memo still
pertain to this current proposal. A condensed summary of this memo would read as
follows:
Our main concern with both the rezoning and special use request is the concern of
traffic. It is still our opinion that a drive-thru. fast-food restaurant will compound
the traffic problems in this area, and if this site were to be used for another type of
restaurant, we would anticipate improved traffic flow both on-site and off. As
another option, a larger sized parcel would afford more design flexibility thereby
improving traffic flow.
With the additional access point into the Courtesy parking lot, the traffic flow is better than
any of the other previous submissions. This extra acoess point will relieve marry of the
potential traffic flow problems that were present with previous submissions. The
elimination of the drive-thru facility and/or an increase in the size of the parcel, would
further help to alleviate some of the traffic concerns.
With reference to the requested tions, we have no lith[ problems. A 15 foot setback
along Raid Road is adequate to provide for a decent landscape buffer, although a 30 foot
landscape buffer strip would have been more desirable. However, as a -off, the site
plan provides a nice triangular area at the southwest corner of this property. We would
prefer a 10 foot minimum rear yard setback in order to allow a minimum size planting area,
but this could only be accomplished with additional purchase of land from Courtesy. Both
the Zoning Board and Village Board had no objections to these same variations when
presented last year. The deletion of the delivery loading area from previous plans will not
present a problem, if deliveries are limited to certain off -times when customers are not
present.
PB:hg
t1
Village of Mount Prospect7:A A,
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: DAVID M. CLEMENTS, DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-Z-89, 20 -SU -89, 21-V-89, JOHN KAMYSZ
LOCATION: 720 EAST RAND ROAD (FORMER HONEY BEE RESTAURANT SITE)
DATE: APRIL 19, 1989
The applicant is requesting rezoning this parcel from"'B-3 to B-4 along with a special use
to allow a drive-through fast-food restaurant ,of 1560 square feet. Also requested are the _
following variations:
1. Section 14.2002.13 to allow a 5' rear yard instead of 20' as required by Code
2. Section 14.2002A to allow a 13-1/2' front yard instead of 30' as required by
Code
3. Section 14.2002.0 to allow a 3' side yard instead of 10' as required by Code.
In reviewing this application, several comments were noted by the different staff
departments. They are as follows:
1. IDOT permits will be required for any work done on Rand Road Right-of-
way.
2. Grading and detention will have to be reviewed for the property. An interior
storm sewer system should be added eliminating sheet flow drainage onto
Rand Road.
3. New water and sanitary sewer service will be required depending upon volume
of water to be used. There is currently a 16r watermain on the northeast side
of Rand Road.
4. All Development Code requirements must be met including sidewalks,
parkway trees, etc.
5. Engineering and building plans must be submitted for all buildingL
Gil Basnik - Page 2
April 19, 1989
COMMEND
This proposed fast-food drive-thru restaurant is to be located at the site of the former
Honey Bee Restaurant The site is to be combined with a 20' wide strip of land to be
acquired from the Courtesy Home Center. This entire parcel is presently vacant and paved
with asphalt. As you may recall from previous 1986 and 1988 hearings, this site is
practically unbuildable on this odd -shaped lot. Therefore, Mr. Xamysz is a contract
purchaser of an additional 20' wide strip of land from the Courtesy Home Center in order
to attempt to meet the setback requirements and accommodate required parking and car
stacking spaces. However, even with the increased parcel size, all setback requirements by
Code have not been met.
The Comprehensive Plan identifies this parcel as being best suited for general
commercial/office. A fast-food restaurant falls within this category. The surrounding Land
uses to the north, east, and west are all businesses. Single-family residential is located
across Rand Road. The staff windshield survey of Rand Road businesses identified five
fast-food restaurants, including three with drive-thru facilities, and five sit-down restaurants,
from west of Elmhurst Road and continuing east to Central. The "greatest concentration
of these restaurants occurs around the Kensington and Rand Road intersection. There are
also at least three other restaurants in nearby Mount Prospect Plaza.
In 1988, the Kentucky Fried Chicken Corporation had a similar request for this property.
They requested rezoning, special use for a drive-thru and some variations to the setback
requirements. You may recall, they had cont -Acted to purchase a 5V wide strip of land
from Courtesy Home Center in order to attempt to meet the setback requirements and
accommodate their parking. The proposed Kentucky Fried Chicken building was slightly
larger at 1,700 square feet The staff memo regarding the 1988 request is attached for your
reference. A brief summary of the Village's main concerns of that previous proposal is as
follows:
We were of the 2!rtWon that a drive-through %Lftj;A
vjgW
01 1 1 A.AAY .
Mr. Kamysz's new proposal for this property is similar in scope to the previous submission.
The differences are outlined as follows:
1. Mr. Kamysz is proposing one 36' wide driveway cat onto Rand Road, whereas
Kentucky Fried Chicken requested two curb cuts onto Rand and out access point
into the Courtesy Parking Lot.
2. Mr. Kamysz has a contract to purchase a 20' wide strip of land from Courtesy,
whereas Kentucky Fried Chicken proposed to purchase a 50' wide strip. As a result,
Mr. Kamysz is requesting greater variations to the setback requirements in the front
yard and side yards.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
April 19, 1989
3. The design of Mr. Kamyszs proposal is such that more landscaped area is provided
at the southwest comer than the previous Kentucky Fried Chicken proposaL
However, less landscaping along Rand Road is provided on this new proposal
4. Mr. Karnysz proposes to build the proposed restaurant and lease the property to a
restaurant operator.
Our main concern with both the special zoning and special use request is the concern of
Vic. It is still our opinion that a drive-through fast-food restaurant will compound the
traffic problems in this area, and if this site were to be used for a fast-food restaurant
without a drive-through facility, we would anticipate improved traffic flow, both on-site and
off. As another option, a larger sized parcel would afford more design flexibility, thereby
improving traffic flow. However, it should be noted that the current request provides only
one driveway to Rand, solving a major objection to the Kentucky Fried Chicken request.
It would also be of benefit to have an additional access point into the Courtesy parking lot
property such as what was proposed on the Kentucky Fried Chicken site plan.
With reference to the requested variations, we have no MAj'Qr problem. A 15' setback along
Rand Road is adequate to provide for a decent landscape buffer although a 30' landscaped
buffer strip would have been more desirable. However, as a trade off, this site plan
provides a nice triangular area at the southwest comer of the property. We would prefer
a 10minimum rear yard setback in order to allow a M-1—HUM size planting area, but, this
could only be accomplished with additional purchase of more land from Courtesy.
In summary, the Village still has concerns with the traffic which will result from a drive-
through fast-food restaurant (mainly the off-site traffic). The elimination of the drive-
through facility and/or an increase in size in the parcel would help alleviate some of the
traffic concerns. The variations in yard setback, although passable, could be better if
additional land was provided.
DMC.bg
VILL�GE OF MOUNT PRO-S-PECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: May 8, 1990
SUBJECT. Fair Housing - Annual Report
You might recall that last year the Village Board adopted a revised Fair Housing
Ordinance. The new ordinance gives the Plan Commission responsibility in administration
and enforcement of fair housing matters.
One provision of the Fair Housing Ordinance is a requirement for the Plan Commission
to submit an annual report of their fair housing activities. This report is attached for
acceptance by the Village Board.
DMC:c1
attachment
MOUNT PROSPECT FAIR HOUSING REPORT
FOR 1989
The Plan Commission is pleased to submit to the Village Board the following report on
Fair Housing activities in the Village of Mount Prospect for the year of 1989.
This past year, the Village Board gave the Plan Commission extensive responsibility in
assuring that fair housing is the way of life in Mount Prospect. It included in those
responsibilities the ability to hold hearings on and make findings of fact with respect to any
fair housing complaints, to recommend the issuance of orders and other appropriate
enforcement procedures to the Village Board and to publish its findings of fact, to take
actions to eliminate unlawful real estate practices when needed, to act to assure that
persons living, working or desiring to live in Mount Prospect are free of discrimination, to
take such actions and to make recommendations to the Village Board that are necessary
and desirable for fulfilling the Commission's fair housing responsibilities and to submit an
annual report to the Village Board on the Commission's fair housing activities.
This past year, the Plan Commission sent two ordinances to the Board that were designed
to bring our ordinance into compliance with federal and state law as well as to strengthen
fair housing in Mount Prospect. As a result of these ordinances, the Village now has an
fair housing administrative service, which is performed in the Village Manager's office as
well as a current listing of all forms of illegal discrimination.
The Plan Commission also looked into a number of procedures and systems that would help
in evaluating how best to implement fair housing in our community. We received
considerable assistance from representatives from the City of Evanston, the Northwest
Board of Realtors, and Village of Arlington Heights, on this matter. In order to further fair
housing, the Plan Commission decided to request that the fair housing ordinance have a
provision requiring all real estate firms and apartment owners to post the Village's fair
housing poster where a real estate transaction will occur. The purpose of the poster is to
provide the public a phone number (392-6000, Ext. 203) for filing complaints. A cover
letter and the poster were sent to all real estate firms and owners of apartment buildings
in Mount Prospect. (See attachments A and B.)
During the reporting period, the Village of Mount Prospect received no fair housing
complaints.
Respectfully submitted
K.
i/2-/90
Donald Weibel,
Plan Commission Chairman
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
1W INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM UR OW USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: May 4, 1990
SUBJECT: Municipal Auction Ordinance
Attached is a proposed ordinance for the disposal of Village -
owned surplus property, which no longer has any apparent use.
The articles for sale will be limited primarily to office equip-
ment, portable equipment, etc.; no vehicles will be sold.
The sale will be held at the Public Works facility at 1700 W.
Central Road, and all items will be sold as is. Buyers will be
encouraged at time of sale to remove their purchases from the
premises the day of the sale. The Village will not deliver any
items purchased. If a buyer is unable to remove purchases the
same day, arrangements can be made by appointment only, for a
maximum of one week after sale, to remove items.
I request that this ordinance be presented to the Village Board
on May 15, 1990, and I recommend that the second reading of the
ordinance be waived so that we can advertise for the auction to
be held on Saturday, May 19, 1990.
HLW/td
attach.
on Zly� V;#:A
WHEREAS, in the opinion of at least three-fourths of the corpo-
rate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect, it is no
longer necessary or useful to or for the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect to retain ownership of the personal
property hereinafter described; and
Whereas, it has been determined by the Mayor and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect to sell said personal
property at a public auction to be held on Saturday, May 19,
1990, at 11:00 AM;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUST-
EES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: Pursuant to Section 11-76-4 of the Illinois
Municipal Code, Illinois Revised Statutes, C24, Section 11-76-4,
the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect
find that the personal property described in the attached "Exhib-
it A" now owned by the Village of Mount Prospect, is no longer
necessary or useful to the Village of Mount Prospect and the
best interests of the Village of Mount Prospect will be served
by its sale.
SECTION TWO: Pursuant to said Section 11-76-4, the Village
Manager or his designate is hereby authorized and directed to
sell the aforementioned personal property now owned by the Vil-
lage of Mount Prospect, at public auction on Saturday, May 19,
1990, at 11:00 AM at the Public Works facility, 1700 W. Central
Road, Mount Prospect, Illinois.
SECTION THREE: The village Manager is hereby authorized and
may advertise the sale of the aforementioned personal property
in a newspaper published within the community before the date of
said public auction.
SECTION FOUR: No offer which is less than the minimum price
set forth in the list of property to be sold shall be accepted.
SECTION FIVE: Upon payment of the full price, the Village
Manager or his designate is hereby authorized and directed to
convey and transfer title to the aforesaid personal property to
the purchaser.
SECTION SIX: Any items remaining unsold after the above date
may be disposed of by the Village Manager or his designate in a
manner which is in the best interests of the Village.
SECTION SEVEN: This ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after it's passage, by a vote of at least three-
fourths of the corporate authorities, and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PASSED AND APPROVED THIS -dav of
ATTEST:
VILLAGE CLERK
MAYOR
1990.
2
10
1
2
2
3
1
Min. Bid
Table lamps (orange)
$ 1.00 ea.
Victor computer
5.00
Microfilm viewing screen
1.00
Gestetner copy machine
10.00
Credenza
2.00
Desk
2.00
Storage cabinet
2.00
Tube files
.50 ea.
Blackboard
2.00
Angle slots
.05/ft.
Roto cultivators
3.00 ea.
311 diaphragm pumps
5.00 ea.
Digital Rainbow computer w/color monitor,
keyboard, and stand
5.00
Exxon word processor w/printer and sheet feeder
2.00
Exxon word processor w/printer
2.00
Exxon word processor (no disk drive)
1.00
Exxon word processor (disk drive unit)
1.00
Okidata dot-matrix printer
1.00
Computer chair
2.00
Chairs .
1.00
Swivel chair (brown)
2.00
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO A DETERMINATION OF
THE PREVAILING WAGE RATES
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has enacted "An Act regulating wages of
laborers, mechanics and other works employed in any public works by the
State, County, Village or any other public body or any political
subdivision or by an one under contract for public works," approved June
26, 1941, as amended (Ill.Rev.Stat. 1987, Ch. 48, para. 39s-1 et seq,
as amended by Public Acts 86-799 and 86-693); and
WHEREAS, the aforesaid Act requires that the Village of Mount Prospect
of Cook County investigate and ascertain the prevailing rate of wages
as defined in said Act for laborers, mechanics and other workers in the
locality of said Village of Mount Prospect employed in performing
construction of public works, for said Village of Mount Prospect.
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE VILLAGE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: To the extent as required by "An Act regulating wages of
laborers, mechanics and other workmen employed in any public works by
the State, County, City or any public body or any political subdivision
or anyone under contract for public works," approved June 36, 1941, as
amended, the general prevailing rate of wages in this locality for
laborers, mechanics and other workmen engaged in the construction of
public works coming under the jurisdiction of the Village is hereby
ascertained to be the same as the prevailing rate of wages for
construction work in the Cook County areas as determined by the
Department of Labor of the State of Illinois as of June, 1990, a copy
of which wage rates are on file with the Village Clerk in the main
office of the Village. The definition of any terms appearing in this
Ordinance which are also used in the aforesaid Act shall be the same as
in said Act.
SECTION TWO: Nothing herein contained shall be construed to apply said
general prevailing rate of wages as herein ascertain to any work or
employment except public works construction of this 'Village to the
extent required by aforesaid act.
SECTION THREE: The Village Clerk shall publicly post or keep available
for inspection by any interested party in the main office of this
Village this determination of such prevailing rate of wages.
SECTION FOUR: The Village Clerk shall mail a copy of this determination
to any employer, and to any association of employees and to any person
or association of employees who have filed, or file their names and
addresses, requesting copies of any determination stating the particular
rates and the particular class of workmen whose wages will be affect by
such rates.
SECTION FIVE: The Village Clerk shall promptly file a certified copy
of -this determination wiCh bot'.h the Secretary of State and the
Department of Labor of the State of Illinois and shall further cause to
be published in a newspaper of general circulation within the Village,
a copy of this determination which shall constitute notice that the
determination is effective and that this is the determination of the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION SIX: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
I
Prevailing Wage
Page 2 of 2
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR PREVAILING WAGES FOR COOK COUNTY EFFECTIVE 06/01/90
These Prevail ing Mageg shall be included in tiw-^ntracts and their advertised specifics Ined in Section 2 of the
Prevailing Mage Act 8111, Visa. Stat. 4887. Ca par.. 39s-1) . is a party, for the construct on �^s trutirurn, nia,nt-.;!,e and/or repair of public
buildings or public works within the Stake of As which repoI res or invdlvas the an loymeenk of 1n s, wgrk ars, and aachan ics, and owner/operators.
Minimum wa s, ovartia>e rate and fringe oanefits"..,rrkified herein shall ea paid. This state of preva5imy„wl9es to be paid shad be posted by the contractor
in a prorol nein and easily accessible place at the site of work, This aid.
is Chd ert of the 11B inois p artaentof Labor and shall not be,.
altered without their consent in writing,
NAME OF TRADE RG
TYP
C
L
S
HOURLY RATES
BASIC FORMN
OVERTIME RATE
M -F SA 151.161-L
AFTER ALL ALL
8 HRS HRS HRS
HRLY.FRINGE RATES
WLFR PENSN VACTN
ASBESTOS ABT -MEC
BLD
16.700
18.350
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.170
2.150
.000
ASBESTOS ABT -GEN
BLD
16.700
18.350
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.470
1,300
,000
HT/FRST INSUL.
BLD
20.450
21,450
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.170
2.150
.000
BOILERMAKERS
BLD
21.300
22.300
2.O
2.0
2.0
2.760
2.000
.000
BRICKLAYERS
BLD
19.260
20.260
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.100
.000
CLNRS,CKRS,PNTS
BLD
20.350
21.350
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.150
1.350
.000
CARPENTERS
ALL
20.250
21.250
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.430
1.480
.000
CEMENT MASONS
ALL
19.400
20.150
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.150
1.730
.000
ELECTRICIANS
BLD
21.500
23.000
1.5
1.5
2.0
3.010
2.060
.000
LINEMEN/OPR
ALL
20.550
22.050
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.490
1.750
1.560
GROUNDMEN
ALL
15.550
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.880
1,330
1.180
ELVTR CNSTRCTRS
BLD
21.820
24.550
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.795
1.890
.000
�LA2IERS
BLD
20.000
21.000
1.5
2.0
2.0
1.850
2.400
.000
MACHINERY MVRS
BLD
15.650
17.150
2.0
2.0
2.0
3.070
3.400
.000
)RN IRON WRKRS
ALL
20.700
21.700
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.200
3.420
.000
FENCE ERECTORS
ALL
14.940
15.940
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.200
1.820
.000
STEEL ERECTORS
ALL
19.270
20.270
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.600
5.360
.000
LABORERS
ALL
16.700
17.350
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.470
1.300
.000
MACHINISTS
BLD
19.650
20.650
2.0
2.0
2.0
1.600
1.000
.000
MARBLE SETTERS
BLD
21.080
21.480
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.700
1.000
.000
)PER. ENGINEERS
BLD
1
22.500
23.250
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.500
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINEERS
BLD
2
21.200
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.500
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINNERS
BLD
3
19.550
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.500
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINEERS
BLD
4
17.800
2.0
2.0
2.0
2.500
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINEERS
HWY
1
20.700
21.200
1„5
1.5
2.0
2.250
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINEERS
HWY
2
20.150
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINEERS
HWY
3
18.900
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINEERS
HWY
4
17.400
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
2.250
1.250
)PER. ENGINEERS
HWY
5
16.100
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
2.250
1.250
'AINTERS
BLD
20.200
22.720
1.5
1.5
1.5
2.000
.950
.000
'AINTERS (SIGN)
BLD
16.290
16.540
1,5
1.5
2.0
1.350
1.050
.000
'IPEFITTERS
BLD
21.800
22.800
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
1.750
.000
'LUMBERS
BLD
21.250
22.250
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.650
1.680
.000
'LUMBERS - TECH
BLD
20.050
21.050
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
1.250
.000
'LASTERERS
BLD
19.000
20.000
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.250
1.250
.000
SPRINKLER FITTERS
BLD
19.460
20.710
1.5
2.0
2.0
2.400
2.500
.000
ROOFERS
BLD
20.250
21.250
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
.750
.000
SHEETMETAL WRKRS
BLD
20.350
21.650
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.300
2.260
1.000
SIGN HANGERS
BLD
16.470
16.970
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.110
1.150
.000
STONE WORKERS
BLD
17.760
18.760
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.100
.000
TERRAZZO WORKER
BLD
20.100
20.600
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.800
1.050
.000
FILE LAYERS
BLD
19.900
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.550
1.550
.000
FILE HELPERS
BLD
17.000
2.0
1.5
2.0
1.550
1.200
.000
TRUCK DRIVERS
ALL
1
16.500
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.400
1.300
.000
TRUCK DRIVERS
ALL
2
17.050
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.400
1.300
.000
TRUCK DRIVERS
ALL
3
17.250
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.400
1.300
.000
(RUCK DRIVERS
ALL
4
17.450
1.5
1.5
2.0
2.400
1.300
.000
rRUCK DRIVERS W
ALL
1
17.650
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.525
.000
TRUCK DRIVERS W
ALL
2
17.800
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.525
.000
TRUCK DRIVERS W
ALL
3
18.000
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.525
.000
TRUCK DRIVERS W
ALL
4
18.200
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.750
1.525
.000
TRUCKERS -BLD MAT
ALL
1
17.225
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.725
1.425
.000
TRUCKERS -BLD MAT
ALL
2
17.475
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.725
1.425
.000
TRUCKERS -BLD MAT
ALL
3
17.675
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.725
1.425
.000
TRUCKERS -BLD MAT
ALL
4
17.875
1.5
1.5
2.0
1.725
1.425
.000
Cook County
TRUCK DRIVERS W That part of the county West of Barrington Road,
The following list is considered as those days for which holiday rates of wages for work performed apply:
New Years Day, Memorial/Decoration Day Fourth of July, Labor Day, Veterans Day Thanksgiving AaY Christmas Day.
Generally any of these holidayyss which fall on a Sunday is celebrated on the following Thanksgiving
This then mikes cork performed on that Monday payable at the
appropriate overtime rate for halidey pay. Comm practice in a given local may atter certain days of celebration such as the day after Thanksgiving for
Veterans Day. If in doubt, please check with IDOL.
EXPLANATION OF CLASSES,
TRUCK DRIVER - BUILDING HEAVY AND HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION -COOK COUNTY
Class 1. A -frame truck when used for transportation purposes; Air Compressors and Weldin�Machines rncludi n9 those pulled by cars pick-up trucks and
tractors; Aad lances• Batch Gate Lockers• Batch Hopperman; Car and Truck Washers; Carry Al1Is; Fork Lifts and no
Helpers- Mechanics Helpers and
Greasers; Oil Distributors, 2 -man operation; pavement breakers; Pole Trailer, up to 40 feet, Power Mower Tractors; Self -Propelled Chip Spreader* Shipping and
receiving Clerks and Checkers; Skipman; Slurry Trucks. 2 -man operation• Slurry Trucks Conveyor Operated - 2 or 3 -man operation; Teamsters, Unskilled Oumpmen;
Warehousemen and Dockmen; Truck Drovers hauling warning lights, barricades, and portable toilets on the job site•
Class 2. Dispatcher; Dump Crets and Adgetors under 7 yards; Ddapsters, Track Trucks, Euclids. Hug Bottom On Turnapulls or Turnatrailers when Pulling other
than self -loading equipment or similar equipment under 16 cubic yards; Mixer Trucks under 7 yards; Ready -Mix Plant Hopper Operator; Winch Trucks, 2 Axles.
Class 3. Dump Crets and Adgetors 7 yards and over, Dumpsters, Track Trucks, Euclids Hug Bottom Dump Turnatrailers or Turnapulls when pulling other than
self -loading e�tuiPsent or similar equipment over It cubic yards. Explosives and/or Fissioo Material Trucks, Mixer Trucks 7 yards or over; MW ile Cranes while
intransit; Oil Oistributors, 1 -man operation; Pole Trailer, over 40 feet; Pole and Expandable Trailers hauling material over 50 feet long; additional 50t per
hour; Slurry Trucks, 1 -man operation; Winch Trucks, 3 axles or more; Mechanic - Truck Welder and Truck Painter.
Class 4, Asphalt Plant Operators in areas where it has been past practice Dual-purpose vehicles, such as mounted crane trucks with hoist and accessories;
Foreman; Master Mechanic; Self -loading equipment like P.B. and trucks with scoops on the front.
OPERATING ENGINEERS - BUILDING -COOK COUNTY
Class 2. Bobcat (over 3/4 cu. yd.)•.Boilers• Brick Forklift; Broom, All Power Propelled; Bulldozers; Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Over); Conveyyoor, Portable;
Fortlift Trucks; reamer Engineer•.Hnghlift ?:hovels or Front End loaders under 2-1/4 yd.: Hoists. Automatic; Hoists, inside Freight Elevators; hoists Sewer
Dragyyi ng Machine• Hoists, Tugger tingle Drum; Rollers, All; Steam Generators; Tractors, All: Tractor Drawn Vibratory Roller (Receives an additional x.50 per
hourl• Winch Trucks with 'A' Frame.
Class 3. Air Compressor -Combination - Small Equipment Operator; Generators: Heaters Mechanical: hoists, Inside Elevators - (Rheostat Manual Controlled)
Foists, Inside Elevators -Push Button with Automatic Doors- Hyyddraulic Power Units (Pile Driving and Extracting); Po s, over 3 1 to 3 not to exceed a total
of 300 ft. ); Pumps, Well Points; Welding Machines (2 through 5j; Winches, 4 small Electric Drill Winrhes; Bobcat (up to and incl udinq 314 cu. yd.).
Class 4. Foists, Inside Elevators, Push Button with Automatic Doors; Oilers: Brick Forklift.
OPERATING ENGINEERS -HEAVY AND HIGHWAY -COOK COUNTY
Class 3. Boilers; Brooms, Alt Power propelled- Cement Supply lander; Compressor Corson Receiver (21 Concrete Mixer (Two Bag and Overt; Conveyor, Portable;
Farm -Tie a Tractors Used for Hawing Badding etc.. Fireman on Boilers• Forklift trucks' Groutsrq Mac On. Hoists, Automatic, Hoists Al Elevators; Hoists.
Tugger Single Dile; Jeep Diggers Moving,
Jacking Machines; Post -Hole Di qer: Power Saw toncrete Power Driven; Pug Mit Is: Rollers, other than asphalt, Seed and
Straw Biovar; Steen Generators; ;stump Machine. Wince. Trucks with 'A' Frage; Work Boats; Tamper - Fors -Motor Driven.
Class 4. Air Compressor - Small and Large, Asphalt Spreader, Backend Man, Combination - Small Equipment .0perator• Generators - Small SOkw and Under;
Generators - Large over 50kw; Heaters Mechaniral; Hydraulic Power Unit (Pile Driving, Extractingg, or Drnl lnrgl• light Plants All (1 through 5): Pumps over
3' (1 to 3 not to exceed a total of 3b0 ft.); Pumps, Well Points; Tract -afire; Welding Narhines (Z through 5); inchdt, 4 Snail Electric Drill Wenches; gobwts
(up to and including 3/4 cu. yd.).
Class S. Oilers.
Other Classifications of Work:
For definitions of classifications root otherwise set out, the Department generally has on file such definitions which are available. If there is no such
definition on file the Bureau of Lobar Statistics SIC list will be used. If a task to be performed is not subject to one of the classifications of Dpay set
mut, the Department will upon being contacted state which neighboring County has.such a classification and provide such rate, such rate Dein?g deemed to exist
by reference do this document. Further, if no such neighboring countyY rate appl nes to the task, the Department shall undertake a special ddtermination, such
special determination being thorn deemed to have existed under this determination.
Prevailing rates of wages have been determined for the following classifir�moons which may not be listed: barber, hairdresser and cosmetologist; baker;
bartender; cook (Cook. San amen)• elevator operator; food service worker {Wok, SannDgaaon, U of I -C) furniture mover (Wok) janitor (Wain, Rama);
maintenance worker -re• plant; sillwrigh. moving picture machine operator; a ratf ng 4 sneer -stat unary or hazardous waste, sewage disposal and water
plant fleet in4 platform• patrol officer t{toak ); piledriver• railroad comstructtoo aM ad nterarce worker, security gquard• stationary fireman• sound
echnician' to ecommunicatnon service technician; theatrical stagg employee; tag beat opmratar• underwater diver; we71 drillers. If a project requires these.
or any classification amt listed, please contact IDOL at 217/762/,..710 for wage rates or clarifications.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PRO-6'PECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
115 13171) 35
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: Kenneth H. Fritz, Economic Development Director
DATE: May 10, 1990
SUBJECT: Request for Village Board Support, Cook County Tax Incentive 6B Program
Dimension Works Inc., a manufacturer of design and build trade show exhibits for industry
is seeking to locate in the Lake Center Corporate Park developed by Alter Group at the
northwest comer of Algonquin and Elmhurst Road. The proposed development would
include four lots at the north end of the corporate park. The first phase would call for a
new 125,000 square foot manufacturing facility.
After reviewing the proposed preliminary site plan and letter of introduction, it is clear that
Dimension Works Inc. would qualify under the definition of manufacturing for the 6B tax
incentive program which defines manufacturing as follows:
"The material staging and production of goods used in procedures commonly
regarded as manufacturing, processing, fabrication, or assembling which changes
existing material into new shapes, new qualities, or new combinations."
Clearly 70% of the floor area will be devoted to a manufacturing process. Another 17%
will be utilized for warehouse with 13% being utilized for office space in the building. A
second phase would be proposed for expansion of more than 1-1/2 times the size of the
assembly operation in the first phase. They plan to employ 70 full time and 45 part time
workers in their new facility. Their history has shown a quick growth rate over a twelve
year period and their plans for expansion show a commitment to stay in the Mount Prospect
market area convenient to Interstate transportation.
May 9, 1990
Mr. John Dixon
Village Manager
Village Hall
100 S. Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Dear Mr. Dixon:
The Alter Group has been working with Dimension Works over the last
several months toward making this firm a tenant at Lake Center Corporate
Park. We have been very impressed with the quality of the company, and
with the high-level professional reputation it enjoys throughout the business
community.
Dimension Works fits the business image we are trying to project for the
park, and we feel this company would be a valued asset both to the profile
of Lake Center Corporate Park and to the Village of Mount Prospect.
Ae
Wly,
William A. A ter
Chairman & Chief Executive Officer
sm
'1000 Glenview Ro'A
wilrfletto9 IIIIY9qi"60091.
PAX f T08) 256-9450
708 256 7 700
ii-n2risior"."'.—
W U I IrIC. 595 SUPREME DRIVE, BENSENVILLE, IL 60106 800-365-3659 # FAX 708-860-0453.708-860-9800
May 8, 1990
Mr. John Dixon
VILLAGE OF MT. PROSPECT
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, Illinois 60056
RE: Class 6B Resolution for a New Industrial Facility Located at Lake
Center Corporate Park.
Dear Mr. Dixon:
Dimension Works is recuesting that the Village of Mt. Prospect rule
favorably on providing class 6B tax relief at Lake Center Corporate Park.
Dimension Works is considering building a new, 125,000 square foot
manufacturing facility, expandable to approximately 225,000 square feet
on Lots 5, 6, and 7 of parcel 08-23-203-028, 029, and 030. The cost of
the facility is estimated at $6.5 to $7.0 million dollars. The Alter
Group will be the developer and builder of this facility. Enclosed is
a site plan of the planned facility.
We are currently located in Bensenville, DuPage County. Our company
designs and builds trade show exhibits for all industries. our broad
list of clients include many Fortune 1000 companies, such as Quaker Oats,
Borden, G.D. Searle, Scott Foresman & Co., Vidal Sassoon, Beecham Labora-
tories, and many other companies. As indicated by our excellent growth
record we enjoy an excellent reputation in our industry and with our
clients. We, therefore, desire that our new facility portray a high-quality
image.
We will employ 70 full-time and 45 part-time in our new facility. In
addition, our growth has been exceeding 50% per year, so we anticipate
that by 1993, we will employ over 100 full-time employees. We project
that we will build an additional 100,000 square feet by 1994.
Since our customers' requirements are quite unique, our manufacturing or
job shop tends to also be unique in order to meet our clients' needs. Our
designers will custom design an exhibit which will then be detailed to
develop a manufacturing blueprint. Our shop will then construct the
exhibit using primarily wood products. We utilize various complimentary
products such as carpeting, laminates, steel, plastic, lighting and
graphics which we provide in house.
When the exhibit is completed it will be totally assembled for the client
to view so that they can see the total exhibit for their final approval. The
exhibit will then be sent to a show, after which it may be returned to us for
refurbishing and/or modifications.
We are now in the process of marketing a new portable exhibit which we call
our "Signature" to be mass produced and sold through a network of distributors
throughout the USA.
ii-na-ision W_-
-'vvorKS'Inc. 565 SUPREME DRIVE, BENSENVILLE. IL 60106 600-365-3659 o FAX 708-860-0453 0,708-860-980",
May 8, 1990
Page 2
our attorneys have indicated that we qualify for class 6B tax relief.
The 6B designation is necessary for us to consider the Mt. Prospect
site. Without the 6B designation, we will be forced to consider other
sites in DuPage County due to the Real Estate Tax Savings. As you
know, we must receive village approval prior to our applying with the
county assessor for the 6B designation.
Our company started approximately 12 years ago in a 2400 sq. ft. store
front building. We then moved to an 8400 sq. ft. building in Chicago,
which we quickly outgrew. In January 1986 we moved to our current
42,000 sq. ft. location in Bensenville and added another 41,000 sq. ft.
in January 1989.
Trade shows are the most effective vehicle for marketing products to
industry and retailers. About 60% of OEM orders are placed at trade
shows and it is anticipated this % will increase substantially as we
enter the 1990's. Through our excellent reputation and quality products
we will experience future growth as we have in the past few years.
We need to be in a new facility by February 1, 1991; therefore, we need
to begin construction by early sumer.
Your favorable ruling will assist Dimension Works in becoming a new
corporate neighbor for Mt. Prospect.
Respectfully,
DLI7M�ENS �S,INC.
James Gutschick
President
enc.
JG/bp
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING TO CLOSE A STATE ROADWAY
IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A PARADE
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect desires to hold the annual
Independence Day Parade on a portion of Central Road and Elmhurst
Road (Route 83) in the Village of Mount Prospect on Wednesday,
July 4, 1990; and
WHEREAS, said parade will require closure of that portion of
Central Road between Northwest Highway and Busse Road, the curb
lane of Westbound Central Road between Busse Road and Arthur
Street, and Elmhurst Road (Route 83) between Northwest Highway and
Golf Road; and
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois requires that the Village assume all
responsibility and liability involved in the closure of said State
roadways.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Village of Mount Prospect hereby requests
the State of Illinois, Highway Department, to close Central Road
between Northwest Highway and Busse Road, the westbound curb lane
of Central Road between Busse Road and Arthur Street, and Elmhurst
Road (Route 83) between Northwest Highway and Golf Road between the
hours of 1:00 P.M. and 3 P.M. in order to conduct the annual July
4th Parade, a copy of which parade route and requested roadway
closures is attached hereto.
SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect will assume full
responsibility for the direction, protection and regulation of
traffic during the time the detour is in effect and all liability
for damages of any kind occasioned by the closure of the
aforementioned roadways.
SECTION THREE: That the Village of Mount Prospect will provide for
efficient all weather detour signs, to be maintained, conspicuously
marked and judiciously patrolled by the Police Department for the
benefit of traffic diverted as a result of the street closure
requested herein.
SECTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
derald L. Farley
Mayor
X,
1990.
DC/caf
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE DIMENSION WORKS, INC.
MAKING APPLICATION FOR COOK COUNTY CLASS 6b TAX EXEMPTION
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect encourages community
development to provide for economic growth and career
opportunities; and
WHEREAS, through property tax incentives offered by Cook County,
various opportunities exist for new businesses to become
established in Mount Prospect, Cook County; and
WHEREAS, without the Cook County property tax incentives, Mount
Prospect is at a competitive disadvantage with in the neighboring
counties of Lake and Du Page in attracting industrial development;
and
WHEREAS, Dimension Works, Inc. has requested the Village of Mount
Prospect to support their application for a Class 6b real property
classification; and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities of the Village of Mount Prospect
believe that their request is in the best interest of the economic
development in the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby endorse the application of Dimension
Works, Inc. for a Class 6b Property Classification from Cook
County, which allows a 16% assessment level for 8 years followed
by a 30% level for the next 4 years for the property identified in
Exhibit "All attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION TWO: That the Village of Mount Prospect supports
industrial growth, increased employment and economic development
and this proposed development is in furtherance of this goal.
SECTION THREE: That development of the property is subject to
compliance with all requirements of the I-1 (Light Industrial)
District and development standards of the Lake Center Corporate
Park.
SEQTION FOUR: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
NV4*6
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
0
1990.
EXHIBIT ONA11
Lots 5, 6, 7, and the north 150.881 of Lot 4 in Lake Center
Plaza Subdivision being a resubdivision of part of Lot 4 in
Linnemann's Division of part of the Northweat Quarter (1/4)
of Section 23, and part of the Southeast Quarter (1/4) of
Section 14, all in Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the
Third Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois, recorded on
July 1, 1988 as Document No. 88-291118
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: May 9, 1990
SUBJECT: Catch Basin/Inlet Cleaning Bid
Sealed bids were opened this date for a contract to clean specified
amounts of inlets and catch basins in various sections of Mount Pros-
pect. Following are the bid results:
Bidders
Dombrowski & Nat'l Power Stanton
Holmes, Inc. Rodding Corp. Equipment
Unit Unit Unit
Price Total Price Total Price Total
Inlets $ 50 $24,600 $ 45 $22,140 $ 18 $ 8,856
Catch Basins 80 20,880 105 27,405 157 40,977
Totals $45,48,0 $49,545 $49,833
On page 155 of the current budget, account code 1-071-07-6264, there
is $50,000 allocated for this work.
I recommend that the bid as submitted by Dombrowski & Holmes be Accept-
ed at the unit prices shown. I request permission to increase the
quantities up to, but not exceeding, the $50,000 allocated for this
purpose.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM Tru ary M
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: May 9, 1990
SUBJECT: Lawn Tractor/Mower Bid
Sealed bids were opened today for the proposed purchase of a
lawn mower/tractor with selected accessory equipment. Tabula-
tion of results as follows:
Chicago Turf & Reinders
Irrigation Brothers
Toro Groundsmaster 345 $17,670.69 $19,896.72
with cab, mounting unit,
snowblower & related ac-
cessory equipment.
On page 212 of the current budget, account code 48-077-93-8235,
there is $22,000 allocated for this work.
I recommend acceptance of the lowest bid as submitted by Chicago
Turf & Irrigation in an amount not to exceed $17,670.69.
0'5
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
VILLAGE OF MOUNT mospt&
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: MICHAEL E. SIMS, PLANNER
DATE: MAY 8, 1990
SUBJECT: BID RESULTS FOR THE MOUNT PROSPECT HISTORICAL
MUSEUM LIFT PROJECT
The project consists of performing necessary work in order to make the Mount Prospect
Historical. Museum at 101 South Maple Street handicapped accessible via the porch on the
east side of the main building. The work calls for the installation of footings and
foundation for support of a new handicapped lift, the moving of the existing porch door
and re -installation, the installation of new steps, a new porch flooring, new 5 foot wide
service walks on the east side of the building, and all necessary structural and electrical
work to make the handicapped lift fully operational.
A notice to bidders was published in the Mount Prospect Herald on April 6, 1990 for a bid
opening date of April 25, 1990. Staff contacted six contractors, four of whom picked up bid
documents. The following is a summary of the bid opening.
R. J. Haack Builders, Inc. $26,500.00
Staff has learned this past week that the Mount Prospect Historical Museum is seeking a
waiver from the State of Illinois Capital Development Board from Handicapped accessibility
requirements for the main building at 101 South Maple Street. As a result of this action,
staff would -recommend that the above noted bid be rejected, as it is not appropriate to hold
the bid any longer. If the requested waiver is not granted, this item can be re -bid in the
future.
MES:hg
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: May 9, 1990
SUBJECT: C.N.W. Railroad
Commuter Parking Rehabilitation
On May 8, 1990, bids for rehabilitation of the west commuter
parking lot were opened. only one bid was received, as follows:
Jacobs and Son, Inc. $109,775
The above amount would include construction of a new, concrete
block retaining wall between the edge of the railroad tracks and
the parking lot, new curb on the interior of the parking lot,
slurry seal over the entire lot, and restriping.
On page 194 of the current budget, account code 46-073-03-8728,
there is $50,000 allocated for parking lot rehabilitation and on
the same page, account code 46-073-03-8729, there is $70,000
allocated for retaining wall repairs.
Our consultants, Donohue & Associates, recommend acceptance of
the low base bid of $109,775 to Jacobs and Son, Inc. They also
recommend that an amount of 10% of the bid, or approximately
$11,000, be set aside for contingencies. There is the possibili-
ty that the contractor may encounter deficiencies in the parking
lot that were not spelled out in the specifications.
An optional bid of $29,250 for upgrading the sidewalk in the lot
from asphalt to concrete paving stones was also received. our
recommendation will not include this optional item, but it may
be considered at a future date to improve the aesthetics of the
central business district. After approval by the Village Board,
it would be our intent to submit a letter to the officials of
the C.N.W. Railroad to pursue the possibility that they will
share in the cost of this rehabilitation work.
ert L. weeks
HLW/td
May 9, 1990
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
Attn: Mr. John Fulton Dixon
Village manager
ENGINEERS
ARCHITECTS Re: Mt. Prospect/C.N.W. Railroad
SCIENTISTS Commuter Parking Lot
Rehabilitation
Donohue Project No. 17340.001
Dear Mr. Dixon:
At the bid opening on May 8, 1990 for the above -referenced
project, of the eight bidders, only one submitted a bid.
This bid from Jacobs and Son, Inc. was a base bid of $109,775.00
with an add alternate of $29,250.00 for upgrading the sidewalk on
Northwest Highway to concrete paving stones.
The base bid is approximately $10,000.00 below our estimate and
Mt. Prospect's budget. If the alternate is accepted, the cost
would exceed the budget.
We have reviewed the bid and prices, and find them in order.
Even though only one bid was received, the prices are very
reasonable.
Jacobs & Son, Inc. has a "Certificate of Eligibility" for IDOT
projects. Also, our checking with his references did not reveal
anything negative. we therefore recommend that the Village of
Mt. Prospect award the contract for the base bid proposal of
$109,775.00 to Jacobs and Son, Inc.
Due to the concealed nature of a large part of the existing
conditions, we strongly recommend that a contingency of
$11,000.00 (108 of the cost) be set aside in the budget.
0 1501 Woodfield Road
Suite 200 East
Schaumbur
,g, Illinois 60173
708.605.8800
Telefax 708 605.8914
We look forward to continue to assist you with this project
through its implementation.
Yours very truly,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Naras Statkus
ENGINEERS Project Manager
ARCHITECTS CC: Herbert L. Weeks
SCIEN rISTS Fred Borich
NS: kav
T/L/DT1
Village of Mount Prospect
May 9, 1990
Page 2
VIL—AGE OF MOUNT PRO'-; 'PECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John F. Dixon, Village Manager, il,;p
VL l
FROM: David M. Clements, Director of Planning & Zoning
DATE: May 9, 1990
SUBJECT: Field Change - Evergreen Woods P.U.D.
The developer of the Evergreen Woods, Mr. Mike Royster, has requested a field change
to the P.U.D. Mr. Royster has asked for the Village Manager to consider the addition of
a 6' fence along the west lot line. This fence will provide increased privacy and security
from the adjoining shopping center for the residents at 1000-1010 Arbor Court.
The approved landscape plan depicts a hedge at this location. However, residents and
potential buyers of the homes have indicated a preference for a solid wood fence, as it
would take the hedge several years to reach a mature height to provide total screening.
While a taller hedge could be planted initially, Mr. Royster believes the fence is the most
appropriate screening abutting commercial property.
The Planning & Zoning staff has no objection to the proposal, and notes that the proposed
fence should be adequately landscaped on the townhome side, so residents can benefit from
plantings to soften the impact of the fence.
Wolf Point Realty, Inc.
1024 Arbor Ct.
Mt. Prospect, Il. 60056
Phone: 593-5551
April 9, 1990
Mr. David Clemmens
Director of Planning and Zoning
Village of Mt. Prospect
100 S. Emerson
Mt. Prospect, Il. 60056
Re: Installation of fencing along rear yards of 1000-1010 Arbor Ct.
Dear Dave:
This is a request for a field change to the PUD for the Evergreen Woods
subdivision as it relates to the rear yards of the above referenced units.
As I understand the code, the installation of a 6' high privacy fence is
permitted as a visual barrier between residential and commercial
property. The adjoining strip center of stores creates such a condition for
these units.
The fencing design would be consistent with what is currently being used
between units as privacy partititons. Please reference the revised
landscaping plan for details on the change.
We request your approval of this request at your earliest convenience.
Yours truly,
Michael J. Royster
President
enc.
ti I# W WEN EF F! �1
WDY05ED IFE14CE
Z 7
, kur- Ukp
M
CAF/
5/9/90
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Mayor and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount
Prospect has deemed that the best interests of the Village would
be served by entering into Intergovernmental Agreements; and
WHEREAS, it has determined that the best interest of the Village
would be served by entering into an Intergovernmental Agreement
with Arlington Heights, Elk Grove Village and Des Plaines for an
automatic response when a hazardous materials incident occurs,
which cooperative response will provide the additional manpower
and equipment in order to handle a potential dangerous situation.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK CQUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the Board of Trustees do hereby authorize the
Village of Mount Prospect to participate in an Intergovernmental
Agreement between the Village of Arlington Heights, Elk Grove
Village and the City of Des Plaines for the purpose of cooperative
responses to hazardous material incidents.
SECTION TWO: That the Board of Trustees do hereby authorize and
direct the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his signature on the
Intergovernmental Agreement between Village of Arlington Heights,
Elk Grove Village and the City of Des Plaines for the purpose of
cooperative responses to hazardous material incidents, a copy of
said Agreement is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION THREE: That this Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval in the manner
provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this _ day of 1990.
ATTFST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
I
AU'T'OMATIC AID AGREEMENT AMONG
THE VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
THE CITY OF DES PLAINES
THE VILLAGE OF ELK GROVE VILLAGE
THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
In accordance with Chapter 24, Section 11-6-1, of the Illinois
Revised Statutes that empowers Municipalities and Fire Protection
Districts to enter into Mutual Aid Agreements, the above Municipal-
ities agree to provide automatic aid to each other on hazardous mat-
erials incidents.
Purpose of Agreement
To better utilize equipment and manpower available within the
geographical area by providing automatic response equipment and
manpower at the scene of hazardous materials incidents thereby pro-
viding the citizens of all.communities with more effective service
within current financial limitations.
General Conditions
1. Minimum manning per each response will be two (2) fire depart-
ment State Certified Haz-Mat II personnel.
2. At all times the fire department having jurisdiction will
be in -charge and responsible for operations at the hazardous
materials incident scene.
3. Each municipality involved in this Agreement will provide
a communication system to allow immediate dispatching of
all units due to respond and a communication system for
apparatus to be used after dispatch.
4. Each fire department involved in the agreement shall pro-
vide -for one (1) inter -department training drill per year
so that each can become familiar with the other's operation,
equipment and areas of mutual response.
5. It is understood that in the event a unit due to respond
is out -of -service, or busy at another call, no back-up unit
will respond.
6. If on the way to an automatic response, a unit receives a
dispatch to an alarm in its own community, it shall not divert
from its response until the incident commander of the
originally strickencommunityhas been informed and acknowledges
the unit needing to divert and that it will not respond to
to his incident.
7. All radio communications between responding units will be on
the NIFERN (MABAS) radio frequency.
8. Each community will regularly monitor the number, extent
and procedures of alarms involving automatic response.
9. Each participating Municipality agrees to waive all claims
against the other parties for compensation for any personal
injury or death occurring in consequence of the performance
of this AutOmCtic Aid Agreeinezit. General liability insurance,
personal injury and property damage insurance against loss or
damage of equipment is the responsibility of the individual
Municipality as it applies t9 their own manpower and equip-
ment. All responses performed under this Automatic Aid Agree-
ment shall be rendered without reimbursement to any Municipality,
except that, each Municipality rendering aid under this agreement
shallbe reimbursed by the stricken Municipality for all sup-
plies, equipment, and personnel overtime occasioned by a
hazardous materials incident as described herein.
Response Area
The response areas for the purpose of this agreement shall be
limited to the corporate limits of the participating communities
and those areas protected under contract by these communities.
Termination of Acjreement
By Council/Board action any of the participating communities
may withdraw from this Agreement by notifying the Mayors of the
other Communities, in writing, whereupon the withdrawing community
will terminate,participation sixty (60) days from the date of the
written notice.
Term
This Agreement shall be effective as of June 1, 1990 and shall continue
in full force and effect until terminated as provided above.
Mayor, Village of Arlington Heights Date
Mayor, City of Des Plaines
Mayor, village of Elk Grove Village
Mayor, Village of Mount Prospect
H
4.
Date
Date
Date
5/8/90
Village of amount Prospect
,Mount Prospect, Illinois
S
k).
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MAY 11, 1990
SUBJECT: MELAS PARK
The bid from Martam Construction Company will be good until Wednesday of next week
for the storm drain outlet structure to be done at Melas Park. This item is before the
Board for your consideration for authorization for work to be done. The Water
Reclamation District has indicated that they fully intend on doing some soil and site -
work preparation later this summer, however, they will not be able to do any of that
work unless the storm drain system has been corrected. They have given us a Permit
to do the work as outlined in the contract with Martarn. Construction a n d a r e
anticipating that we will follow through and have this work completed as soon as
possible.
JFD/rcw
attachment
VILLAGE • • •
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDM?
TO: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon
FROM: Fire Chief Edward M. Cavello
DATE: May 10, 1990
SUBJECT: NEW PUMPER PAYMENT
On June 6 1989 we opened bids for a new pumper and equipment Pierce
was the low bidder for $202,818. This figure was presented to the board as
one amount on June 13, 1989.
In August of 1989 we were notified by GFE that we could save $750 by
issuing a separate purchase order for the equipment.
On September 11, 1989 we issued two purchase orders; one to Pierce for the
pumper and some minor equipment, and one to GFE for $23,250 instead of
the $24,000 figure.
While the total expended amount was less than presented to the Board, we
failed to notify the Board of the change in payment. I apologize for the
oversight and hope we have not caused undue confusion.
2WO-04�11 —4x
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon
FROM: Fire Chief Edward M. Cavello
DATE: June 13,'1989
SUBJECT: NEW PUMPER BID
Sealed bids were opened on June 8, 1989, at 10:00 AM for the
proposed purchase of one new fire pumper. The equalized bid
results bid results are as follows:
BIDDER
BID PRICE
PIERCE
$202,818.00
ABLE FIRE & SAFETY
$202,155.98
FMC CORP
$212,290.00
WS DARLEY
$204,369.00
This pumper will replace a 1976 pumper that is heavily rusted.
Funds are available in the 89/90 budget on page 204, under
Account Code 53-077-62-8046. Due to our recent positive
experiences with PIERCE, I recommend the purchase from the
PIERCE MFG CORP.
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
0-
Village of (,-Jaunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois ,4
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: MAYOR GERALD L. FARLEY AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
FROM: VILLAGE MANAGER
DATE: MAY 11, 1990
SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF A NEW FIRE DEPARTMENT PUMPER
AUTHORIZED IN 1989
In June of 1989, the Village Board authorized the purchase of a new fire pumper from
Pierce for a total price of $202,818. Subsequent to the authorization for the bids, we
were informed that we could save $750 if we were to purchase some of the fire
equipment such as nozzles, etc., directly from Great Lakes Fire Equipment in an amount
of $23,250 and then the chassis and cost of the pumper itself would be $177,078 to
Pierce. This would reduce the total cost for the pumper down to $200,328.
While this is within the guidelines established in the bidding procedures and the
authorization of the Board, there is a technicality in that the Board's authorization was
for a total cost to Pierce of $202,818.
We need to have the Board reaffirm the purchase of the pumper at a cost of $177,078
to Pierce and $23,250 to Great Lakes Fire Equipment for a total cost of $200,328. Since
the second check is over $4,000, the Board needs to authorize the cutting of the second
check.
JOHN FULTON DIXO
JFD/rcw
attachment
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon
FROM: Fire Chief Edward M. Cavello,
DATE: May 10, 1990
SUBJECT: NEW PUMPER PAYMENT
On June 6 1989 we opened bids for a new pumper and equipment Pierce
was the low bidder for $202,$18. This figure was presented to the board as
one amount on June 13, 1989.
In August of 1989 we were notified by GFE that we could save $750 by
issuing a separate purchase order for the equipment.
On September 11, 1989 we issued two purchase orders,- one to Pierce for the
pumper and some minor equipment and one to GFE for $23,250 instead of
the $24,000 figure.
While the total expended amount was less than presented to the Board, we
failed to notify the board of the change in payment. I apologize for the
oversight and hope we have not caused undue confusion_
EdwardM. Cavello,
Fire Chief
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ILLINOIS
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager John Fulton Dixon
FROM: Fire Chief Edward M. Cavello
DATE: June 13, 1989
SUBJECT: NEW PUMPER BID
Sealed bids were opened on June 8, 1989, at 10:00 AM for the
proposed purchase of one new fire pumper. The equalized bid
results bid results are as follows:
BIDDER
BID PRICE
PIERCE
$202,818.00
ABLE FIRE & SAFETY
$202,155.98
FMC CORP
$212,290.00
WS DARLEY
$204,369.00
This pumper will replace a 1976 pumper that is heavily rusted.
Funds are available in the 89/90 budget on page 204, under
Account Code 53-077-62-8046. Due to our recent positive
experiences with PIERCE, I recommend the purchase from the
PIERCE MFG CORP.
Edward M. Cavello
Fire Chief
0.
BID WORKSIM"T
ITZ11S*
7 c3O 3
l 00'
V,
1;
3,
..............
/14 14
V- 6-0 t tL
f-0-
.... ...... ...
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Requisition Information
DEPARTMENT FIRE
REQUISITIONED BY:
�09 AUTHORI;ED AGENT
DEPARTMF F�AD
APPROVED FO URCHASE Y:
Y"
GE NA ER
ACCOUNT NO, FUNDS INITIALS
CHECKED AVAILABLE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILL.
100 S. EMERSON ST.
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone: (M) 392-6000
F PIERCE FIRE APPARATUS
2600 AMERICAN DR
0 T P.O. BOX 2017
APPLETON WI 54913
I
✓ DATE INITIATED 9/11/89
OTHER VENDORS:
3U322
NAME
-11-
1119OROER NO"RMI
1151 *IPI^R 11 All
pPQ
�� N
-
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILL.
100 S. EMERSON ST.
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone: (M) 392-6000
F PIERCE FIRE APPARATUS
2600 AMERICAN DR
0 T P.O. BOX 2017
APPLETON WI 54913
I
✓ DATE INITIATED 9/11/89
OTHER VENDORS:
3U322
NAME
-11-
1119OROER NO"RMI
1151 *IPI^R 11 All
PRICE
AND CARTONS.
ORDER NO.
30322
REG. NO.
177,078.0
NAME
-
PRICE
kCHEb
REASON ORDER PLACED WITH SUCCESSFUL BIDDER
Lowest Price
Quality
Best Dei'y
Service
Only Source
Best Design
F�
ri
1-1
F
El
1:1
OTHER REASONS
PURCHASE ORDER
DATE 9/11/89
-11-
1119OROER NO"RMI
1151 *IPI^R 11 All
—0, CES. PACKING LISTS
AND CARTONS.
ORDER NO.
30322
REG. NO.
177,078.0
F
s
H
P
T ATTN: ULREICH
0
1
NOT SUBJECT TO THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS SUBJECT
SALES TAX TO THE CONDITIONS STATED ON
THE REVERSE SIDE THEREOF.
ACCOUNT CODE OTY, DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES UNIT
I PRICE TOTAL
—53-077-91-8001
-11-
'PIERCE ARROW 4,DOOR ENGINE PER THE MOUNT PROSPE
PIERCE
v"VUM7Y7
177,078.0
SPECIFICATIONS, PROPOSAL, LESS EXCEPTIONS
-
ER 4TT,
kCHEb
L
--j7�72j'
V1 L4L
A
PACKING SLIP To Accompany Shipment or
Mailed Same Day Shipment is Made. FINANCE
ORIGINAL
F
S
CFE, INC. FIRE APPARATUS SERV, H
T 401 PEORIA STREET 11
0 WASHINGTON, IL. 61571 T ATTN: ULREICH
0
VENDOR CODE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Juj�j
Requisition Information
FIRE
THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS SUBJECT
9/11/89
DEPARTMENT
DATE INITIATED
TO THE CONDITIONS STATED ON
ITHE
REQUISITIONED BY:
OTHER VENDORS:
DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED AGENT NAME
PRICE
APPROVED FOR URCHASE BY:
NAME
PRICE
TOTAL
REASON ORDER PLACED WITH SUCCESSFUL BIDDER
VILLAGE MANAGER
Lowest Price Quality Best Del'y Service
Only Source Best Design
ACCOUNT NOj--- FUNDS INITIALS
El 00 El
E-1 n
CHECKED AVAILABLE
OTHER REASONS
.77
'Q
PURCHASE ORDER
$,_23,250
DATE 9/11/89
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILL.
100 S. EMERSON ST.
�111EI MUST A111— ON ALL
1* U,,, , INVOICES. PACKING LISTS AND CARTONS
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone: 392-6000
ORDER NO.
30323
(312)
REO. NO.
F
S
CFE, INC. FIRE APPARATUS SERV, H
T 401 PEORIA STREET 11
0 WASHINGTON, IL. 61571 T ATTN: ULREICH
0
VENDOR CODE
DELIVERY
NOT SUBJECT TO
THIS PURCHASE ORDER IS SUBJECT
I
TAX
I
TO THE CONDITIONS STATED ON
ITHE
EfSALES
,
REVERSE SIDE THEREOF.
ACCOUNT CODE
QTY.
DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES
UNIT
TOTAL
PRICE
53-077-91-8001
SUPLLEMENTARY BID AS PER ATTACHED SUPPLIES
.77
'Q
'JUNE 8, 1989
$,_23,250
7
7
Nw
VI L4 AGE OP
MC" TPROSPECT
PACKING SLIP To Accompany Shipment or
Mailed Same Day Shipment is Made.
nPTATNA1
h
FINANCE DIRECTOR