HomeMy WebLinkAbout3582_001VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
Next Ordinance No. 4164
Next Resolution No. 16-90
A G 7E N D A
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 P B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location:
Meeting Room, 1st Floor
Senior Citizen Center
50 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
Meeting Date and Time:
Tuesday
April 3, 1990
7:30 P. X.
April 3, 1990
Mayor Gerald "skip" Parley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Van Geem
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, March 20, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
A. Mount Prospect Historical Society Presents
Corporate Citizen Awards: First Chicago Bank of
Mount Prospect and Randhurst Merchants Association
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. PROCLAMATIONS:
1. ARBOR DAY, April 27, 1990
2. SENIOR CITIZEN MONTH, May, 1990
3. ORGAN DONOR WEEK, April 22 - 28, 1990
4. LIBRARY WEEK, April 22 - 28, 1990
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Pate Subdivision, 1000 Cardinal Lane
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A RECAPTURE AGREEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY KNOWN AS PATE'S
SUBDIVISION
This Ordinance sets for the properties involved
in the recapture agreement as well as the
percentage that said properties will be
required to pay as their share of this improvement.
(Exhibit A)
B. ZBA 15-V-90, 215 East Prospect Avenue
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 215 E. PROSPECT AVE.
This ordinance grants the following variations:
To allow an 111 side yard to the east and a 25.561
side yard on the west, instead of the required 301;
to allow the existing front yard of 29.571, instead
of the required 301; to allow a 151 rear yard instead
of the required 401; to allow a lot size of 2.285
acres, instead of 4 acres; to allow two 120 x 351
loading docks, instead of the required 121 x 501; to
allow 61 parking spaces instead of the required 66;
to allow a zero foot distance on the east for
parking, instead of the required 101 and 151 on the
south, instead of the required 301; and, to allow
84% impervious surface lot coverage (3,684 sq. ft.
over the permitted maximum of 80%). The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit B)
B. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING SPECIFIED
SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 18 (TRAFFIC CODE)
This Ordinance prohibits parking on the north
side of Henry Street for the first 35 feet east
of Owen; prohibits parking on Highland Avenue
35 feet from the corner on both the north and south
side on Highland west of Main Street; reduces the
speed limit on Eric, Neil, Autumn and Harvest Lane
from 30 MPH to 25 MPH and prohibits parking anytime
on the north and south sides at the narrow portion
of Harvest Lane; and, prohibits parking on within
a specified area on the west side of Nordic Road
The Safety Commission recommended these amendments
by votes of 6-0. (Exhibit C)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
B. ZBA 17 -SU -90, 2200 South Busse Road
The Petitioner is requesting a special Use in the
nature of a Planned Unit Development to permit a
light industrial area with 5 units. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this
request by a vote of 6-0.
C. ZBA 14-V-90, 910 Owen
The Petitioner is request variations to allow a
24 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage, instead
to the permitted 151; to allow a zero foot setback
for a parking pad; and, to allow 37% impervious
coverage in the front yard instead of the permitted
35%. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these variations by a vote of 4-0.
ZBA 18-V-90, 7 South Edward Street
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit
a 4 foot separation between the existing garage and
proposed room addition, instead of the required 101
and to allow 47.5% lot coverage, approximately 200
square feet over the allowed 45%. The Zoning Board
of Appeals, by a vote of 5-0 recommended approval
of t"_11e request for the 4 foot separation between
structures, however, the request for 47.5% lot
coverage was denied by a vote of 3-2.
E. ZBA 19-V-90, 1411 Circle
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow an
accessory structure 400 square feet in size, instead
of the permitted 120 square feet, and 12 feet high,
instead of the permitted 10 feet. The Zoning Board
of Appeals recommended to grant this request by a
vote of 5-0, subject to the condition that no
business be operated on the property.
F. ZBA 21-V-90, 301 East Rand Road
The Petitioner is requesting variations for the
property located at the corner of Highland and Rand
to allow an 18 foot front yard building setback,
instead of the required 30 feet (along Highland); to
allow a 10 foot rear yard building setback, instead
of the required 20 feet; to allow zero foot setbacks,
instead of the required 20 feet when adjacent to
residential and 30 feet when adjacent to a right-of-
way (both Highland and Rand); and, to waive the
requirement for a 121 x 351 loading dock. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
G. ZBA 22-V-90, 2100 South Elmhurst Road
The Petitioner is requesting variations to permit a
parking lot and driveway aisle setback of zero feet
instead of the required 30 feet along Midway Drive
and to allow a maximum building height of 351 611,
excluding the light well, instead of the permitted
30 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 5-0.
I.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
(MERCHANTS, BUSINESSES, OCCUPATIONS AND
AMUSEMENTS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amends Article XXIII of Chapter 11
regulating disposal of yard materials.
(Exhibit D)
J.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19
(HEALTH REGULATIONS) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance amends Chapter 19 relative to
disposing of yard materials.
(Exhibit E)
K.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23
(OFFENSES AND MISCELLANEOUS REGULATIONS) OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance amends Chapter 23 relative to
disposing of yard materials.
(Exhibit F)
L.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 8
(REAL ESTATE TRANSFER TAX) OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance increases the real estate transfer
tax paid by the purchaser from $1.00 per $1,000
to $3.00 per $1,000. The Finance Commission
recommended this increase.
(Exhibit G)
M.
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance increases the license fee for
cigarette vending machines from $50 to $150.
(Exhibit H)
X. VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
A.
Bids:
1. Turf mowing contract
2. Engineering Study for High Service Pump
Replacement, Phase 3
3. Reconstruct northern portion of Schoenbeck Road
4. Detention/Storm Water Improvement - Melas Park
B. Proposal for 1990 material testing
C. ist reading of AN ORDINANCE ADOPTING THE ANNUAL
BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990/91 (Exhibit J)
D. TCI update
E. A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF A GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL
PROTECTION AGENCY
F. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. EXECUTIVE SESSION
A. Review and Approve Minutes of the
for the past 6 months as well as
of those minutes can be released
status.
B. Personnel
C. Potential Litigation
XIII. ADJOURNMENT
Executive Sessions
considering if any
from confidential
(Exhibit K)
I
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
MARCH 20, 1990
CALL TO ORDER CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION
The invocation was given
by Trustee Busse.
INVOCATION
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
APPROVE
moved to approve the
minutes of the regular
MINUTES
meeting of the Mayor
and Board of Trustees held
March 6, 1990.
Upon roll call: Ayes:
Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays:
None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
APPROVE BILLS
moved to approve the
following list of bills:
General Fund $ 650,483
Motor Fuel Tax Fund 11,520
Community Development Block Grant Fund3,573
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund 62,633
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund 378,319
Parking System Revenue Fund 6,269
Risk Management Fund 77,757
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A -
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B -
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund 5,036
Special Service Area Const. 45 -
Special Service Area Const. #6 -
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985) 11,529
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987) -
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Funds -
Flexcomp Trust Fund 8,343
Escrow Deposit Fund 15,027
Police Pension Fund -
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,230,489
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floras, Van Geem
Nays: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to accept the financial report dated February 28, 1990,
subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Mr. Fieber also stated that he recently received the
Village's information package prohibiting residents
from including yard waste with the regular weekly
garbage. He expressed his feeling that Mount Prospect
could attempt the same approach as Des Plaines, rather
than requiring the resident to create his own compost
heap or purchasing yard waste bags, to be sold by the
Village.
Trustee Corcoran explained that the Village's
Recycling Commission had spent many hours exploring the
various methods of disposing of yard waste and since
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
MEMORIAL DAY
Mr. Jack Keefer, Commander to the Mount Prospect VFW
PARADE
informed the Mayor and Board that the annual Memorial
CRYSTAL TOWERS
Day Parade will be held on Monday, May 28th, being the
day of observance. Mr. Keefer stated that the parade
route will be the usual route, line up at St. Paul's
Church, Busse Avenue and School Street. At 9:30 A.M.
the parade will proceed down Busse Avenue to Emerson,
south on Emerson to Lions Park where a brief service
will be held.
POPPY DAY
Mr. Keefer also asked support for Poppy Day on May
18th.
CLEARWATER BASIN
Mr. Walter Fieber, 808 South Lancaster, stated that
& YARD WASTE
he has noticed the Clearwater Park Basin during heavy
rain falls and felt that a if the slopes around the
CONSULTING FEES
perimeter of the basin were raised in height the
capacity of the basin would be increased by
approximately 20 million gallons of storm water.
Mr. Fieber also stated that he recently received the
Village's information package prohibiting residents
from including yard waste with the regular weekly
garbage. He expressed his feeling that Mount Prospect
could attempt the same approach as Des Plaines, rather
than requiring the resident to create his own compost
heap or purchasing yard waste bags, to be sold by the
Village.
Trustee Corcoran explained that the Village's
Recycling Commission had spent many hours exploring the
various methods of disposing of yard waste and since
MAYOR'S REPORT
PINE/WILLE Mayor Farley noted that the Citizen Committee, which
COMMITTEE was formed to review the events regarding construction
REPORT at 4 North Pine and 317 North Wills, had been completed
and submitted to the Village Board. The house on Pine
Street encroached into the side yard by 1811 and there
was a question as to the height of the foundation of
the house under construction on Wills Street.
Mayor Farley stated that a mistake was made and that
steps will be taken to avoid any such oversight in the
future.
Page 2 - 1990
Mount Prospect does not have a location for municipal
composting like Des Plaines, this is the most feasible
method to dispose of yard waste.
CRYSTAL TOWERS
Mr. Lloyd Levin, representing the Crystal Towers
Condominium Homeowners Association, stated that he
noted an ordinance on the agenda proposing a special
use to permit an auto care facility in the Plaza
United Shopping center, across the intersection from
Crystal Towers. Mr. Levin stated that he strongly
opposes any variations to the area. He also stated
that he does not feel that the Plaza United Shopping
Center should have been allowed.
HISTORICAL
Mr. Levin stated that an antique sale will be held on
SOCIETY
April 24th at Mr. Peters Banquet Hall with the proceeds
to benefit the Mount Prospect Historical Society.
CONSULTING FEES
Mel Krunrey, 817 South We Go Trail, stated that he
feels the Village is entering into too many consultant
contracts and expressed his opposition to the request
in the proposed budget to spend $40,000 to completely
revise the Zoning Ordinance, Chapter 14 of the village
Code. Mr. Krumrey stated that staff should make
recommendations for amendments to the document.
MAYOR'S REPORT
PINE/WILLE Mayor Farley noted that the Citizen Committee, which
COMMITTEE was formed to review the events regarding construction
REPORT at 4 North Pine and 317 North Wills, had been completed
and submitted to the Village Board. The house on Pine
Street encroached into the side yard by 1811 and there
was a question as to the height of the foundation of
the house under construction on Wills Street.
Mayor Farley stated that a mistake was made and that
steps will be taken to avoid any such oversight in the
future.
Page 2 - 1990
Village Manager Dixon stated that procedures are
being established for complaints in an effort to
prevent this type of mistake being made in the
future.
Trustee Corcoran asked the Village Manager to put
his proposed procedures in this regard in writing
such as the remedies, who is responsible for what
actions and when these remedies will be implemented.
OLD BUSINESS
Pate Subdivision, Wildwood Lane
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would grant modifications from the Development Code
to eliminate the requirement for sidewalks an the
proposed cul de sac, reduce the permitted length of
the cul de sac; reduce the minimum lot width on 4
lots; permit parkway trees to be planted on private
property; and, permit a pavement width of 23 feet.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4153
AM ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
CHAPTER 16 (DEVELOPMENT CODE) OF THE
VILLAGE CODE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that
would authorize execution of a recapture agreement
relativetothe development of the subject property.
Due to the fact that the Petitioner's attorney would
like to review this agreement further, it was the
consensus of opinion that this Ordinance be deferred
to the April 3rd meeting of the Village Board.
Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his
signature on the Pate's Plat of Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 81-Z-89 and ZBA 82 -SU -89, Southwest corner of
Elmhurst & Algonquin Roads (Rogers Subdivision)
Ordinances were presented for second readings that
would rezone the subject property from B-3 to
I-1; grant a Special Use in the nature of a Planned
Unit Development consisting of 3 office/warehouse
buildings; an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
to allow industrial/office rather than the existing
commercial/office designation; approval of the
Roger's Plat of Subdivision, creating one lot of
records; and, a request from the Development Code
to permit storm water detention in the loading dock
areas. It was the recommendation of both the
Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals to
grant the respective requests.
Page 3 - March 20, 1990
PATE SUB.
WILDWOOD IN
ORD.NO.4153
RECAPTURE
AGREEMENT
!N1 W-4141 n Y1 0 t "U. ,
ZBA 81-Z-89
ZBA 82 -SU -89
ROGERS SUB.
ALGONQUIN/
ELMHURST
Also presented for first reading was an Ordinance
amending the Official Comprehensive Land Use Plan for
the Village to reflect the I-1 (Light Industrial)
zoning requested for the subject property. The Plan
Commission recommended amending the Comprehensive Plan
for the subject property by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4154 Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4154
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL
COMPREHENSIVE LAND USE PLAN OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4155 Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4155
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING
MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4156 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4156
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE
NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ROGERS SUBDIVISION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO.4157 Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of Ordinance No. 4157
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM
THE DEVELOPMENT CODE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY
KNOWN AS ROGERS SUBDIVISION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 4 - March 20, 1990
ZBA 8 -SU -90, Plaza United, Algonquin/Busse/Dempster
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant a Special Use to permit an auto service
operation in a B-3 District. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended denying this request by a vote
of 3-2.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,
moved to waive the rule requiring two readings of
an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4158
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 1641 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: Van Geem
Motion carried.
ZBA 13-V-90, 705 South Busse Road
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant a 4.51 separation between the
existing garage and the proposed addition to this
home, rather than the required 10 feet and to
allow a 35.81 front yard instead of the required
40 feet, as required in an R -X District. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting these
requests by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4159
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 705 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 15-V-90, 215 East Prospect Avenue
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant the following variations in order
for this existing business to expand: to allow an
ill side yard to the east and a 25.56 side yard on
the west, instead of the required 301; to allow the
existing front yard of 29.571, instead of the required
401; to allow a lot size of 2.285 acres instead of 4
acres; to allow two 121 x 351 loading docks, instead
of the required 121 x 501; to allow 61 parking spaces
Page 5 - March 20, 1990
ZBA 8 -SU -90
PLAZA UNITED
SHOPPING
CENTER
ORD.NO.4158
ZBA 13-V-90
705 S.BUSSE
ORD.NO.4159
ZBA 15-V-90
215 E.PROSPECT
instead of the required 66; to allow a zero foot
distance on the east for parking, instead of the
required 101, and 151 on the south, instead of the
required 301; and, to allow 84% impervious surface
lot coverage (3,684 sq. ft. over the maximum) , instead
of the permitted 80%). The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting these requests by a vote of 6-0.
This ordinance will be presented for second reading
on April 3rd.
ZBA 16-V-90 ZBA 16-V-90, 218 Autumn Lane
218 AUTUMN LANE An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant variations to allow a driveway width of 26 feet,
instead of the permitted 21 feet, and to allow a 10
foot front yard, instead of 30 feet, to permit a
parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting these requests by a vote of 5-1.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4160 Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, move
for passage of Ordinance No. 4160
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 218 AUTUMN LANE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 76-V-89 ZBA 76-V-89, 109 Berkshire
109 BERKSHIRE An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant a variation to allow a 4 foot side yard instead
of the required 7.51 in order to expand a garage. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting this
variation by, a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Busse, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4161 Trustee Wattenberg, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4161
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 109 BERKSHIRE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - March 20, 1990
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that SOLID WASTE
would authorize an agreement between the Village and
the Solid Waste Agency.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ORD.NO.4162
for passage of Ordinance No. 4162
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN
INTERIM PROJECT USE AGREEMENT
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
AMEND CH.18
ZBA 17 -SU -90, 2200 South Busse Road
ZBA 17 -SU -90
The Petitioner is requesting a Special Use in the
2200 S.BUSSE
nature of *a Planned Unit Development to permit a
light industrial condominium complex comprised of
5 units. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
Due to the fact that the Petitioner was unable to
attend this meeting, this matter was deferred to
the next meeting on April 3rd.
The Safety Commission has submitted the following
recommendations in response to citizen concerns:
Busse School Parking Problem
BUSSE SCHOOL
The Safety Commission has reviewed the issues involved
PARKING
with the existing parking permitted in the Village
PROBLEMS
parkway on Henry Street in front of former 'Busse
HIGHLAND WEST
School' site. The Village Board had also considered
OF MAIN STREET
this matter at a Saturday meeting. It was the
recommendation of the Safety Commission, by a vote
of 6-0, to remove the parking area approximately
35 feet east of the STOP sign at Henry and Owen and
AMEND CH.18
restripe the remaining area to permit angle parking.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
AMEND CH.18
to concur with the recommendation of the safety
Commission and authorize the removal of the parking
area approximately 35 feet east of the STOP sign at
Henry and Owen and restripe the remaining area to
permit angle parking.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Village Manager was directed to have the paved
area removed as recommended. An Ordinance will be
presented April 3rd prohibiting parking 35 feet
east of the STOP sign at Henry and Owen Streets.
Trustee Van Geem left the meeting for a brief period.
At the request of a resident, the Safety Commission
HIGHLAND WEST
considered a request to prohibit parking on the
OF MAIN STREET
north and south side of Highland for the first 35
feet west of Main Street. The Safety Commission
recommended granting this request by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
AMEND CH.18
to concur with the recommendation of the Safety
Commission and prohibit parking on the north and
Page 7 - March 20, 1990
Page 8 - March 20, 1990
south side of Highland for a distance of 35 feet west
of Main Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
HENRY AT RAND
A request was presented for a yellow center of the
road line be painted on Henry at Rand Road in an
effort to have vehicles stay on their appropriate side
of the road.. The Safety Commission recommended this
center line be installed by a vote of 6-0.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Safety
Commission to install a center of road yellow line
for a distance of 50 feet from Rand Road.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
HARVEST HEIGHTS
A request was presented by the residents of the
SPEED LIMIT
Harvest Heights Subdivision to prohibit left turns
from Harvest Lane onto Business Center Drive, to close
the entrance from Courtesy Home Center onto Harvest
Lane. It was the recommendation of the Safety
Commission, by a vote of 6-0, that the speed limit on
Eric, Neil, Autumn and Harvest Lane be reduced from
30 MPH to 25 MPH, to prohibit parking on the narrow
portion on both sides of Harvest Lane, close to
Business Center Drive and not grant the request of the
residents.
AMEND CH.18
Trustee Busse; seconded by Trustee Floros, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Safety Commission
and reduce the speed limit on Eric, Neil, Autumn and
Harvest Lane from 30 MPH to 25 MPH and to prohibit
parking on both sides of the roadway at the narrow
portion of Harvest Lane.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem returned to the meeting at this
point.
NORDIC ROAD,
A request was presented to prohibit parking on the
PARKING
west side of Nordic Road for 60 feet south of Algonquin
Road, due to the semi -trailer traffic in that area.
The Safety Commission recommended granting this request
by a vote of 6-0.
AMEND CH.18
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Safety
Commission and prohibit parking on the west side of
Nordic Road for 60 feet south of Algonquin Road.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 8 - March 20, 1990
The Safety Commission also noted that staff would
bring updates to the commission and/or Village
Board at a future date, noting that with new
construction and developments additional traffic
controls are necessary and must be made a part
of the Traffic Code for enforcement purposes.
A Resolution was presented that would approve the
Community Development Block Grant Funds and the
areas targeted to benefit from these funds.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
for passage of Resolution No. 14-90
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FISCAL YEAR
1990 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
ENTITLEMENT PROGRAM
Upon roll'call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
A Resolution was presented that would transfer
funds within the Community Development Block
Grant funds.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
moved for passage of Resolution No. 15-90
A RESOLUTION TRANSFERRING COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FUNDS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
would repeal Ordinance Nos. 2434 and 2435. These
Ordinances grant variations and special use in
the nature of a Planned Unit Development for the
property located at the northwest corner of
Kensington and River Roads. After receiving
these variations and the special use the developer
built in accordance with the village Code therefore
eliminating the need for the Ordinances and since
the Ordinances are recorded against the property
the repeal of these Ordinances will effectively
clear the owners' titles to their property.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to waive the rule requiring two readings of an
Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 9 - March 20, 1990
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
BLOCK GRANT
FUNDS
RES.NO.14-90
TRANSFER
BLOCK GRANT
FUNDS
RES.NO.15-90
MC DONALD
CREEK SUB.
REPEAL ORD.
NOS.2434 &
2435
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4163
AN ORDINANCE REPEALING ORDINANCE NOS. 2434
AND 2435 GOVERNING PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF KENSINGTON AND RIVER
ROADS
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
motion carried.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BIDS: Village Manager, John Fulton Dixon, presented the
following bids for pavement marking:
PAVEMENT Preform Traffic Control Systems $21,853.82
MARKING Marking specialists Corporation $31,307.45
It was the recommendation of the administration to
accept the bid submitted by Preform Traffic Control
Systems, but it was suggested by the Village Manager
that a limit of $15,000 be authorized for this
project.
PREFORM Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
TRAFFIC CONTROL to concur with the recommendation of the Village
SYSTEMS,INC. Manager and accept the bid submitted by Preform
Traffic Control Systems Inc. not to exceed $15,000.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
TCI CABLE TV village manager Dixon presented a matter not listed
NON-COMPLIANCE on the agenda, specifically a possible non-compliance
with the franchise agreement of TCI Cable T.V. Company.
Cheryl Pasalic, Cable T.V. coordinator for the Village
explained that a commercial customer had requested TCI
service over 12 months ago and to date that service
has not been provided. Mrs. Pasalic stated that Ron
Hess of TCI has been notified of the non-compliance.
Ron Hess, representing TCI, acknowledged that there
has been a problem in providing service to this
particular customer and aplogized. He also stated that
the emphasis of TCI was to provide cable service to
residential customers and this is a commercial
customer.
It was noted by Mrs. Pasalic that a penalty could be
assessed by the Village Board of $200 per day of non-
compliance.
Following discussion, it was determined that the
Village Board would allow TCI 2 weeks in order to
provide service to this customer and if that had not
been accomplished by April 3rd the Board would
entertain a motion to assess a fine against TCI.
Trustee Van Geem, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg,
moved to accept the report of the Cable TV
Administrator and delay any penalty against TCI until
April 3rd if service to this customer has
Page 10 - March 20, 1990
has not been provided by that date.
Upon roll call; Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: Corcoran
Motion carried.
Trustee Wattenberg stated that he has heard from
residents requesting the Board to freeze taxes.
He also mentioned that a resident has had received a
permanent partial disability due to an incident at
a local pharmacy.
Mr. Dixon announced that the third and final payment DI Mucci
due to the Village from the past due water bills owed WATER BILLS
by Mr. Di Mucci has been received. PAID
ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:34 P.M.
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Page 11 - March 20, 1990
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Management Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair, Fund
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1985
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1987
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Agency Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
March 29, 1990
Cash & Invest.
Receipts .
Disbursements
Cash & Invest.
Balance
3/16/90 Through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
3/15/90
3/29/90
List of Bills
Entry 3/29/90
$ 2,726,975
$2,180,099
$643,882
$ 4,263,192
521,004
-
110
520,894
10,881
14,370
1,822
23,429
90,820
120,293
10,693
200,420
2,855,085
450,217
54,751
3,250,551
245,505
5,354
7,163
243,696
980,316
22,301
122,283
880,334
689,946
94,918
1,636
783,228
205,315
750
-
206,065
849,422
215,817
3,644
1,061,595
1,293
3,453
-
4,746
1,375,367
22,823
3,159
1,395,031
14,382,650
20,100
37,315
14,365,435
16,297,599
16,374
41,591
16,272,382
287,844
-
-
287,844
141,520.022
JIIIL6&869
$928,049
$43,7584842
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE i
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE
3/29/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
DARYL BOYD
REFUND OUP PMT
E22.00
3Z2.00
EDWIN R. BUTLER
REFUND FINAL WATER
SILL
3.44
REFUND FINAL WATER
BILL
$4.56
35.00
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
PMT-P/R 3/22
$224.25
3224.25*
ANN DELFINO
REF OVERPMT AMBULANCE
$60.93
$60.93
LOI DIEC
REFUND DUPL TICKET
PMT
$20.00
320.00, -
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
PPR ENDING 3/22/90
$3519668.24
t
P/R ENDING 3/22/90
$19423.28
P/R ENDING 3/22/90
$451.33
P/R ENDING 3/22/90
$269738.02
93809280.873
RITA FALK
R'EF FILTH INS CONTR
$5.61
$5.81*
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PRO
FED DEP PAY 3/15
$548.$4
as
FED DEP PAY 3/15
$330.91
a
DUE TO FED DEP PAY
3/22
$109144.40
s
DUE TO FED DFP PAY
3/22
$108.88
DUE TO FED DEP PAY
3/22
$34.53
3
DUE TO FED DEP PAY
3/22
$29045.46
DUE TO FED DEP PAY
3122
5759.92
S13V972.24*
GEISER-BERNER
SONO REFUND
5100.00
BONO REFUND
$100.00
9200.00
GOLDEN NUGGET RESTAURANT
BONO REFUND
$220.00
$220.00
GRATE SIGNS
BOND REFUND
375.00
375.00
IBBOTSON HEATING CO.
BOND REFUND
'$75.00
$75.9$9]
J.S.t. PROPERTIES
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.0
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT-P/R 3/ZZ
$254.00
525+4.00*
DR. KOROAS
REFUND FINAL WATER
BILL
$1.10
REFUND FINAL WATER
BILL
$11.40
312.50
E. C. LUESKER
REFUND FINAL MATER
BILL
$10.41
REFUND FINAL WATER
BILL
$.99
$11.40
M D M CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
M -K SIGNS9 INC.
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BONO REFUND
$100.00
$200.00
MARCY'S CARDS C GIFTS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
3100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
'$25.00
$325.00
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
ARMOND D. KING• INC. SERVICES RENDERED $2xD00.00 $2x000.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $65.42 $65.920
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
MECHANICAL TOWN CONSTRUCTION
BOND REFUND
$100.00
3100.00
MOUNT PROSPECT PU3tIC LIBRARY
PPRT-2NO ALLOC
S3r110.56
S3:110.56#
PARKS PLBG. £ SEWER
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
DAVE PATE £ SONS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
5100.00
PENSION DISBURSEMENTS
MAR POLICE PENSION DISE
$37.315.3+81
#
MAR FIRE PENSION
DISE
$41-591.48
$789906.82#
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$40.00
$40.00
R 3 £ G SEWER
30140 REFUND
5100.00
$100.00
RAY'S HVAC
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
ROGERS MECHANICAL
BOND REFUND
$100.00
SI00.00
ROYAL FUEL LIQUID ENERGIES INC
FUEL PURCHASE
$8:075.03
$8,075.03#
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REINSPECTION FEE
03074
$100.00
REINSPECTION FEE
C3333
$100.00
REINSPECTION FEE
C3691
525.00
REINSPECTION FEE
C6609
525.00
REINSPECTION FEE
CbT34
525.00
REINSPECTION FEE
06767
$25.00
REINSPECTION FEE
1106
$25.00
$325.00
R. M. WHEELER
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
s##TOTAtss
$487x646.41
GENERAL FUND
$3639698.75
COMMUNITY OEVLPMT
BLOCK GRANT
S1w532.1b
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$109692.54
WATER £ SEWER FUND
S29*;65.29
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
$4135.86
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$5.81
POLICE PENSION FUND
$379315.34
FIREMEN•S PENSION
FUND
$41x591.48
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$3x159.18
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
ARMOND D. KING• INC. SERVICES RENDERED $2xD00.00 $2x000.00
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $65.42 $65.920
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 548:i0 $98.70
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $21.91 521.91*
PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE VIDEOS $208.50
VIDEOS 5318.45 5526.35
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 3
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
THEODORE J• WATTENBERG
SR ADVISORY DINNER
135.00
$35.00
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION 0I'1rISITIN
as#TOTAL##
521100.92
GENERAL FUND
529100.92
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
HULY FAMILY HOSPITAL
EMP PHYSICAL -SZAFRAN
5230.00
EMP PHYSICAL -FUME
$235.00
EMP PHYSICAiL-ASPEN
$230.00
$695.00
MR. PETER'S BANQUETS
LUNCHEON - JANONIS
$640.84
$640.84
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$194.07
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$103.95
$298.02
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MI SC EXPENSES
$52.82
i52.82*
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELLI S.C.
SERVICES RENDERED
$+495.50
$445.50
E. F. MONDERLIC PERSONNEL TEST
PERSONN_`L TESTS
$268.50
$268.50
VILLAGE MANAGER'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
521450.68
1
GENERAL FUND
$21450.68
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES 548:i0 $98.70
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES $21.91 521.91*
PUBLIC BROADCASTING SERVICE VIDEOS $208.50
VIDEOS 5318.45 5526.35
VENDOR
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
APRIL RAJCZ`YK
.PERRY RAJCZYK
WHITE COLLAR SERVICES
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
8D MTG PROD CREW 3120
BD MTG PROD CREW 3/20
TEMP HELP—NEWTSON
$190d6.26
PAGE 4
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
325.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$388.70
$388.70
***TOTAL**
$19086.26
JULIE A, BOURIS
SCHOOL REIMB
370.00
$70.00*
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
PAPER
$1*638.85
$19638.85
KEVIN D. CRISWELL
SCHOUt REIMS
$tOO.50
$10O.5o*
CATHERINE HERI4ANEK
SCHOOL REIMB
$141.11
$141.11*
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE CDM
PHONE SERVICE
$456.08
SERVICE
348.80
x504.$8
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$41.45
S4i.45
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$9.38
59.38*
PITNEY BOWES INC.
POSTAGE METER SUPPLIES
$138.92
"$138.92
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$91.14
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$181.35
5272.49
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
O'ELIVERtES
318.ZO
518.20
SYSTEMS FORMS♦ INC.
A/P CHECKS
$569.81
$669.81
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$3,605.59
GENERAL FUND $39605.59
RISK MANAGEMENT
ARTHUR BOESCHE
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT
$30.39
PAGE 5
BROOKFIELD
,ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
$129562.84
#
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
$1009064.97
SLI2972T.81*
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
SELF—INS BOND PREMIUM
$259.00
$259.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS IMC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$49.95
$49.95
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS IMG
LEGAL PAGES
$465.53
$6v959.5
MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE
LEGAL PAGE
$73.12
LEGAL PAGE
$117.00
$655.65
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT-
MISC EXPENSES
$8.00
$8.00#
SPEEDY MESSENGER SERVICE
DELIVERY
$23.60
523.60,
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
***TOTAL**
1737.20
GENERAL FUND
$737.20
RISK MANAGEMENT
ARTHUR BOESCHE
REIMBURSEMENT—PRESCRIPTION
$30.39
$30.39
BROOKFIELD
MED CLAIMS THRU 3/15/90
$129562.84
#
MED CLAIMS THRU 3/22/90
$1009064.97
SLI2972T.81*
DIANNE E. CONNEtL
REIMBURSEMENT
$41.39
$41.39
ARTHUR J GALLAGHER C CO
SELF—INS BOND PREMIUM
$259.00
$259.00
HINSHAYI9 CULBERTSONa MOELMANN9
LEGAL SERVICES
$987.60
'$987.6
HMO IttINOIS
FILTH INS — APRIL
$6.959„56
$6v959.5
MAGNUM AUTOMOTIVE
BODY REPAIRS P-13
$150.00
BODY REPAIRS P-6
$193.15
BODY REPAIRS P-7
5928.35
$1+271.50
RISK MANAGEMENT
***TOTAL**
$1229277.25
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND $1229277.25
POLICE OEPART14ENT
ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION JOURNA SUBSCRIPTION $66.00 $66.00
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY PAPER $607.50 $601.50
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE* REPAIRS 1226.48
REPAIRS $120.18
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
INSPECTION SERVICES
8 E H INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$44.63
SUPPLIES
137.25
$81.88
BRIGHTON ENGINEERING
ENGINEERING SERVICES
$13!600.00
513:600.00
THE DICKSON COMPANY
SUPPLIES
548.1.3
$48.13
LES HANNEMAN
PL8G EXAM APPLICATION
1149.00
3149.00
ILLINOIS INTERAGENCY COUNCIL
REGISTRATION - ROELS
$20.00
$20.00
INACOMP COMPUTER CENTERS
C0MPOTEA SUPPLIES
$325.00
$315.00
DAN JAKES
SCHOOL. R E IMB
$789.00
$789.OG
MOTOROLA* INC.
REPAIRS
(77.40
$77.40
NORTHWEST BLDG. OFFICIALS AND
NWBOCA MTG
$63.00
$63.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$65.14
$65.14
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
.$9.38
#
MISC EXPENSES
5.64
$10.02*
QUALEXr INC.
PHOTO SUPPLIES
$7.47
$T.47
FREDRIC TENNYSON
SEMINAR EXPENSES
5434.40
(434.40
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EXTENS
REGISTRATION-TENNYSON
$765.00
$765.00
CHRISTINE VANDORNICK
CLOTHING ALLOWANCE
$29.4I
$29.41
WEARGUARD
JACKETS
$429.01
JACKETS
$133.82
JACKETS
$91.18
$654.01
XEROX CORP.
TONER
$248.00
5248.00
INSPECTION SERVICES
***TOTAL**
$17*366.86
GENERAL FUND
$179366.86
POLICE OEPART14ENT
ACCIDENT RECONSTRUCTION JOURNA SUBSCRIPTION $66.00 $66.00
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY PAPER $607.50 $601.50
CHICAGO COMMUNICATION SERVICE* REPAIRS 1226.48
REPAIRS $120.18
VENDOR
POLICE DEPARTMENT
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
RICHARD L. ORAFFONE
JAMES EDWARDS
GOODYEAR SERVICE STORES
GREAT LAKES FIRE EQUIPMENT
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
TNT*L ASSON OF ARSON INVESTIGA
KALE UNIFORMS
JOSEPK C. KOLANOWSKI
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAI.r INC
MINOLTA BUSINESS SYSTEMS♦
JOE MITCHELL BUICK9 INC.
NORTH EAST MULTI REGi01NAL
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
NOVAK E PARKER INC.
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
PROSPECT BOARDING KENNEL
ROBERT R. RAN00LPH
INC.
TRAI
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 7
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3129%90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
REPAIRS
566.92
REPAIRS
$232.40
x645.98
BH66-JT-5422-A
$9.86
59.86
EXPENSES
$19.84
$19.84
EXPENSES
$6.00
$6.00
TIRES
$504.00
3504.O0,>
TRAFFIC VESTS
$232.16
$282.16
SERVICES RENOEREO
#250.00
$250.00
061 9 L5 G
$37.82
828 9 15 G
630.63
750 9 15 G
$134.30
5202.75
DUES-GIBSON
$37.00
"$37.00
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$64.18
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$116.90
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$6.58
$187.66
EXPENSES
$12.00
$12.00
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB
90
$166.32
MISC AUTO PARTS FE13
90
3I18.B8
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB
90
3TO.88
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB
90
$149-44
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB
90
$32.20
$537.72
TONER
596.81
$96.81
CAR RENTAL
$100.00
$100.00
TUfTION-BEH1!'N* EDWARDS
$60.00
380.00-
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$47.68
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$45.72
$93.40
TAPES
331.80
$31.80
SURVEILLANCE EXPENSES
$260.00
s
MISC EXPENSES
$67.85
a
MISC EXPENSES
$17.46
0
MISC EXPENSES
$79.87
MISC EXPENSES
315.90
MISC EXPENSES
$9.00
5450.08*
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
182.11
$82.11*
STRAYS - FEB 90
$222.00
$222.00
EXPENSES
56.00
$6.00
GENERAL FUND $5*750.24
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
DON ANDERSON
ARLINGTON HTS. FIRE ACADEMY
ASSOCIATION OF AMER. RAILROADS
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
CHERRY•S TRUCK PARTS
COMPUTERLAND
C014VENTION RECORDERS
CPR PUBLISHERS INC
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
HENRY DAWSON
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
EHRHARDT•S TRAILER SALES* INC
GOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL TESTING
W. N. GRAINGER INC.
MONTHLY CHARGE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
$29.89
PAGE 8
513.91
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
NAME TAGS
$14.06
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
537.31
$65.26
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
$30.00
PAPER
$202.50
SAVE -A -RET
STRAYS FEB 90
5140.00
$140.00
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
RULERS
3412.12
$41Z.12
STANDARD TANK
PARTS E SERVICE
$241.45
3241.45
STOFFEL SEALS CORPORATION
CRIME PREVENTION BADGES
$311.00
$311.00
TRI -R SIGNS
LETTERING P-8
3135.00
5135.00*
PNCE DEPARTMENT
$118.43
***TOTAL**
$S,750.Zg
GENERAL FUND $5*750.24
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
DON ANDERSON
ARLINGTON HTS. FIRE ACADEMY
ASSOCIATION OF AMER. RAILROADS
BUTLER PAPER COMPANY
CENTRAL TELEPHONE OF ILLINOIS
CHAMPION SALES CORP.
CHERRY•S TRUCK PARTS
COMPUTERLAND
C014VENTION RECORDERS
CPR PUBLISHERS INC
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
HENRY DAWSON
DOUGLAS TRUCK PARTS
EHRHARDT•S TRAILER SALES* INC
GOVERNMENTAL PERSONNEL TESTING
W. N. GRAINGER INC.
MONTHLY CHARGE
$29.89
$29.89
NAME TAGS
513.91
NAME TAGS
$14.06
DINNERS -EMERGENCY SERVICE
537.31
$65.26
REGISTRATION-HUEMANN
5375.00
3375.00
PUBLICATION
$30.00
$30.00
PAPER
$202.50
$202.50
070005T0600
$122.64
1122.8
so"IIES
5983.15
$983.15
PARTS S SERVICE
$19551.04
31,551.04
COMPUTER SUPPLIES 6 SERVICE
397.51
'$97.51
EDUCATION TAPES
$56.00
$56.00
CPR BOOKS
$103.10
5103.10
ENVELOPES
$116.43
$118.43
EXPENSES
$289.40
3289.40
PARTS
(145.79
$145.79
SUPPLIES
$37.75
537.75
FIREFIGHTER WRITTEN EXAMS
$4*770.00
$4:770.00
SHOP VAC
$177.72
VACOUM STA 14
$275.69
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/'Z9i90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
FIRE S EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
SUPPLIES
%64.68
%518.09
HEARTH E HOME INC.
GRILLS STA 12 E 13
$500.00
$500.00
HOLMATROt INC.
REPAIRS
$143.2I
5143.2L
tGEt INCORPORATED
OXYGEN
$15.£10
518.00
ILL. EMERGENCY SERVICES MGMT.
REGIS TRATION-CAVELLO
$47.00
347.00
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
424 9 1j G
(192.14
113 9 15 G
$ 75.08
061 9 15 G
$37.83
575 9 15 G
5411.65
244 9 15 G
$23.69
244 9 15 G
$22.63
5763.02
ILLINOIS FIRE CHIEFS* ASSOC.
REGISTRATILIN-CAVELLO
$80.00
580.00
INITIAL SYSTEMSt INC.
SOFTWARE
SZOO.O0
$200.100
INT'$. SOC. OF FIRE SERVICE IN
DUES
$60.00
SUBSCRIPTION
$45.00
REGISTRATION-KtEIN
$150.00
REGISTRATION-VALENTINE
$$50.00
1405.00
J-N ENTERPRISESr INC.
REPAIRS
$76.72
576.72
GARY KLEIN
EXPENSES
5620.00
$620.00
LATTOF CHEVROLET$ INC.
PARTS
-$67.80
$67.80
tOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS E OFFIC
GAZER PAPER
1288.00
1288.00
CTD INTERIORS
SUPPLIES
1140.00
1140.00
MONTGOMERY COUNTY HIRT
REGISTRATION-DAWSON
$125.00
$125.00(
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
SERVICE
565.45
SERVICE
524.25
$819.70
IMOUNT PROSPECT LIONS CLUB
MEMBERSHIP 1990
$70.00
170.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
IN-STATION EDUCATION
5142.$7
5142.17
NORTHWEST REGIONAL TRAINING CO
TRAINING-DUMOVICHt ULREICH
$80.00
$80.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
ST2.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5151.92
5223.92
ORDER FROM HORUER
SlUpPC IES
$105.93
SUPPLIES
$20.88
1126.81
PAGE AMERICA
SERVICE
S34.I3
SERVICE
(27.30
SERVICE
$20.48
%81.91
RED WING SHOE STORE
HOOTS - REINLEIN
5107.95
5107.95
VENDOR
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
SAFETY KLEEN CORPORATION
SECRETARY OF STATE
SERVICE AMERICA CORP.
SOCIETY OF FIRE PROTECTI13N ERG
SOUTHERN FOX VALLEY EMSS OFFIC
KURT STRAUB
SYMANTEC CORPORATION
TERRACE SUPPLY COMPANY
U. S. AUTO GLASS CENTERV INC.
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT UREA
PAUL VALENTINE
VAN/MAC DISTRIBUTING
VILLAGE OF ARLINGTON HEIGHTS
FIRE S EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
SERVICE PARTS CLEANER
PLATES -UNITS 1 E 2
EXPENSES - UEREICH
1990 DUES
TRAINING-BROOSSEAUT SAAS
EXPENSES
SOFTWARE
SU PPL I ES
WELDING SUPPLIES
INSTALL WINDSHIELD
TRAINING - STRAUB
EXPENSES
VEHICLE BRUSHES
TUITION- I STUDENT
INVOICE AMOUNT
$60.75
$16.00
$159.60
$15.00
$200.00
'$50.00
534.95
$81.T7
$43.99
$240.96
$25.00
$120.00
$52.0Q
$ 800.00
***TOTAL**
$14t721.71 CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND
PAGE 10
TOTAL
660.75
S16.00
$159.60
$15.00
5200.00
$50.00
$3*r.95
$125.76
$240.96
$25.00
$120.00
$52.00
$800.00
x15*791.80
$1*0 70.09
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED $311385.00 $3It385.00
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE #a#TOTAt** 2319385.00
GENERAL FUND
$313385.00
VENDOR
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
NORTHWEST MENTAL HEALTH CENTER
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OMNI YOUTH SERVICES
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT.
THE SALVATION ARMY
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
3RD PMT—BUDGET ALLOC
OFFICE SUPPLIES
3RD} PMT—BUDGET ALLOCATION
MISC EXPENSES
BUDGET ALLOC — 4TH PMT
Sts 455.91
PAGE 11
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$375.00
$375.00
$44.64
S4,4.64
$250.00
3250.00
$36.27
536.27#
S1s750.00
Slv750.00
II*IITOT*L**
$29455.91;
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
PUBLICATION
'$31.95
$31.95
WILLIAM N. ANNE'N
FACADE IMPROVEMENT
FINAL $1x500.00
SIV500.00
8 S H INDUSTRIES
OIAZO PAPER
$18.28
$18.28
CITY OF NAPERVILLE
REPORT -IMPACT FEES
$50.00
$50.00#
GREENBAUM BROTHERS
DEGRADABLE BAGS
S616.50
5616.50
NORTHWEST MUNICIPAL CONFERENCE
CENSUS POSTERS
$112.50
$112.50
PADDOCK PLTBLICATIONS INC
AO -CONSUMER EXPO
$570.00
$570..0
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
SLT.01
MISC 'EXPENSES
$14.90
$31.91II
PROMOTIONAL PERSPECTIVES
SEMINAR - SIMS
$275.00
$275.00
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
#v*TOTAL°##
S3*206.14
GENERAL FUND
$2*916.24
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$289.90
�+«#IIIIII#IIIIII#�itII�###II#C#aatgaaII,Rai##�#a�s�sasataos�IIa#a#a#�sa�asa#s�� as��IIata����II:�a3a#as�s�as�as�sts�a#a�m�a�a#
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 12
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
ALLIED ASPHALT PAYING
ASPHALT
5819.40
$819.40
AM -LIN PRODUCTS, INC.
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$278.91
5278.91
ANDERSON LOCK COMPANY
KEYS
$27.30
REPAIRS
350.75
LOCK SERVICE
$53.56
3131.61
MELVYN BOTH
CONFERENCE
1435.00
'3435.00
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
MISC AUTO SUPPLIES 2/90
$4.61-
14ISC AUTO SUPPLIES 2/90
5575.4T
MISC AUTO SUPPLIES 2/90
$338.18
MISC AUTO SUPPLIES 2/90
$15+6.94
SIvO65.98
BUCKERIDGE DOOR Co.
REPAIRS
$52.00
$52.00
CAGE INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$59.2'5
SUPPLIES
$556.60
SUPPLIES
$105.00
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$156.00
$876.85
CHEM RITE PRODUCTS COMPANY
CLEANING SUPPLIES
$225.30
$225.30
ARTHUR CLESEN* INC.
SUPPLIES
$24.60
$24.60
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
UNIFORM SERVICE
$81.07
UNIFORM SERVICE
118.93
UNIFORM SERVICE
$76.98
UNIFORM SERVICE
st4.ZZ
$191.20
COMMODORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
CLEANING SERVICE
$1e836.O0
$1*836.00
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
S/S ELMHURST I E PINE
$173.66
$173.66
OMOHUE L ASSOCIATES• INC.
CONSULTING SERVrL ES
$650.00
CONSULTING SERVICES
$110.14
$T60.14
DOOR SYSTEMS• INC.
REPAIRS
$240.57
SZ40.57
FINISHMASTERs INC.
AUT0 PAINT SUPPLIES FEB 90
$129.81
$129.81
FOREST TREE SERVICE* INC.
PKWY TREE TRIMMMING
$Z.837.46
TREE SERVICE
$815.67
$3v653.I3
THE GOVERNMENT BOOK STORE
PUBLICATION
$37.00
;37,00
HENRICKSEN
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$126.60
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$439.00
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
$1*325.01
$1.890.61
HItTI: INC.
SUPPLIES
$395.00
$395.00
I.E.M. CORPORATION
MTCE AGREEMENT
$9.31
$9.31
ICMA
RESOURCE BOOKS
$132.10
$132.10
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/'90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
STREET DIVISION
9 £ L INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$16.15
$18.15
LATTOF CEASING AND kENTALv IftC
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB 90
$50.00-
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB 90
$37.96
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB 90
512.00
S.04
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MINI BLINDS-STA 13
$61.50
BL IND S
$205.80
5267.30-
LOKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS C OFFIC
SUPPLIES
$237.10
SUPPLIES
$80.71
$31$.81
MILLER SALES• INC.
REPAIR PARTS
$80.11
580.31
NATIONAL ARBOR DAY FOUNDATION
MEMBERSHIP
$15.00
515.00
NATIONAL ELECTRIC CABLE
CABLE SUPPLIES
S67.10
Sb7.10
NATIONAL HEAT AND POWER CORPOR
EQUIPMENT
$992.00
$992.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELEC SUPPLIES FEB 90
SIS.00
ELEC SUPPLIES 2/90
5101.22
ELEC SUPPLIES 2/90
$54.94
ELEC SUPPLIES FEB 90
$9.26
ELEC SUPPLIES FEB 90
$141.27
5324.69
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$16.60
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$35.20
551.80
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL PAGE
329.25
S29.25
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL £ SUPPLIES
$32.04
TRAVEL E SUPPLIES
53.21
#
TRAVEL £ SUPPLIES
$3.89
TRAVEL £ SUPPLIES
$52.53
TRAVEL £ EXPENSES
58.09
s
TRAVEL £ EXPENSES
$16.00
a
TRAVEL 6 EXPENSES
$3.09
a
TRAVEL £ EXPENSES
$1.35
5120.20*
QUILL CORPORATION
SIGN
$33.77
533.77
REDI-STRIP COMPANY
STRIP SIGNS
5162.00
5162.00
RESOURCE RECYCLING
SUBSCRIPTION
'$32.00
S32.00
SEARS: ROEBUCK AND COMPANY
PARTS-ACCT 70352471000
S36.31
S36.3I
SECRETARY OF STATE
RE Pt PLATES 4523
S7.00
$7.00
STANDARD PIPE AND SUPPLY
MISC PLBG SUPPLIES
$49.36
MISC PLBG SUPPLIES
S9.3T-
$39.99
STEINER ELECTRIC
SUPPLIES
$35.70
$35.70
VENDOR
STREET DIVISION
THE TEXWIPE COMPANY
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
STREET DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
CAPITAL IMPRV. E REPL. FUND
WATER ANO SEWER DIVISION
ARLINGTON HTS CAMERA
AUTOMATIC CO"TROL SERVICES
AUTOMATIC CONTROL SERVICES
8 E H INDUSTRIES
BADGER METER INC
BOWMAN OISTRIBUTION CENTER
DAVID BUBLITZ
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMPUTERLAWD
OREISILKER ELECTRIC MOTORS# IN
E E H UTILITY SALES
ENG/SURVEYORS SERVICE CO.
FL€TCHER ENGINEERING COMPANY
GE SUPPLY
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
CRT CLEANER
SUBSCRIPTION
WATER BILL
SIGN MAKING MATERIALS
215*665.56 MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
3565.60
PAGE 14
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$38.08 $38.08
$15.00 $15.00
$35.75 $35.75
$264.15 $264.15
***TOTAL** S16#341.30
$110.14
FILM PROCESSING
$14.50
$Itt.50
MICE -JAN 90
3550.00
$550.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$164.54
1164.54
CRESCENT BOARDS
$15.78
$15.78
USED METER ALLOW
$525.00 -
METERS
5590.03
$65.03
MISC. AUTO SUPPLIES 2/90
$338.19
1338.19
REIMS -SAFETY SHOES
350.00
$50.0(
UNIFORM SERVICE
$81.07
UNIFORM SERVICE
$18.92
UNIFORM SERVICE
$76.97
UNIFORM SERVICE
%14.ZZ
$191.18
SH67-JT-1310-A
158.99
3572 -JT -5608-0
$189.95
SZ48.94
Su"tIES
$39989.00
13#989.00
REPLACEMENT MOTOR
$839.45
'$839.45
SUPPLIES
$643.90
2643.90
SUPPLIES
124.00
524.00
SERVICES RENDERED
$i*359.42
Si#339-4Z
SU PPC I ES
$20.00
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
MATER AND SEWER DIVISION
SUPPLIES
f94.00
$114.00
H R HART PHOTO
FILM PROCESSING
$10.55
$10.55
H -8-K NATER METER SERVICE
WATER SERVICE
$L77.88
WATER SERVICE
677.88
WATER METER MATERIALS
510.66
WATER SERVICE
$177.88
WATER METER MATERIALS
$191.50
WATER SERVICE
6133.41
WATER SERVICE
$177.88
WATER METER MATERIALS
$162.93
WATER SERVICE
5103.14
HATER SERVICE
$2+44.59
METER REPAIR MATERIAL
362.07
MATER SERVICE
$222.35
METER REPAIR MATERIAL
x130.88
WATER SERVICE
$133.41
METER REPAIR MATERIAL
539.52
WATER SERVILE
$34.38
METER EXCHANGES
$446.94
METER EXCHANGES
$343.80
METER REPAIR -LABOR
$177.88
DIETER REPAIR LABOR
$133.4I
8ETER REPAIR LABOR
$111.18
METEK REPAIR LABOR
$111.18
METER REPAIR LABOR
$133.41
METER REPAIR LABOR
5177.88
METER REPAIR LABOR
$244.59
METER REPAIR LABOR
$384.27
METER REPAIR LABOR
$111.18
METER KEPAIR LABOR
$111.18
METER EXCHANGES
$412.56
S%079.62
HENRICKSEN
OFFICE EQUIPMENT
SIV325.01
$19325.01
I.B.M. CORPORATION
MTCE AGREEMENT
$9.3I
$9.31
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
424 9 15 B
$31.05
455 9 15 G
$203.83
U68 9 15 G
$533.12
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/29/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER AND SEVER DIVISION
660 9 15 8
$37.57
774 9 15 G
$30.63
013 9 15 G
$30.63
210 9 15 G
$61.25
044 4 82 G
$97.32
153 9 15 G
$16.65
575 9 15 G
$16.81
303 9 3G 'S
$21.18
338 9 15 G
$17.07
155 9 15 G
$18.58
$1x115.69
ILLINOIS TELEPHONE SERVICE COM
SERVICE
$45.00
$45.00
3 C L INDUSTRIES
SUPPLIES
$169.10
$169.10
LATTOF LEASING AND RENTAL: INC
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB 90
$185.93
MISC AUTO PARTS FEB 90
$10.05
$195.98
d.C. LICHT COMPANY
SUPPLIES -2/90
$12.00
SUPPLIES -2/90
$33.31
SUPPLIES -2/90
550.80
$96.11
AUSTIN MCDANIEL CORPORATION
SUPPLIES
$ls655.00
SUPPLIES
$390.00
12x045.00
MEYER MATERIAL CO.
GRAVEL
$326.76
$326.76
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
SERVICE -FES 90
$31.04
$31.04
NATIONAL POWER RODDING CORP.
SERVICES RENDERED
31x485.00
Stv" 5.0O
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1818 1/2 BONITA OR
$171.73
IIT N WAVERLY
$123.54
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
$382.60
$677.87
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
ELEC SUPPLIES 2/90
$11.95
$11.95
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$26.08
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$6.40
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$198.22
$230.710
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAVEL S SUPPLIES
$41.35
g
TRAVEL S SUPPLIES
117.6+4
�
TRAVEL C SUPPLIES
543.53
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$60.00
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$14.56
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$7.27
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$50.00
+s0'9AS 64Z%
9S•£SSS
00.07567%
99"6075
*98 •L4,7"
*tE•E5£S
#
LI 39V
s*1V1O1#**
95'£455
00'OZ£%
OO.00Z&Z$
99.60ZS
60•ZI%
69'9$
65'93
91'93
99 • L"s
Zi+ `£ PS
00.04?%
+?0.98S 6475
SdWVI!l
SIH Vd
S1NVd
S39OV9
9NISS33OWd WII3
9NISS3l01fd 3 WlI3
9NISS33OWd 3 WlI3
9NISS33UN.d 3 W114
39VtSOd IIID ?H1VM
S3SN3dX3 3 73AVHI
S3SN3dX3 3 13AVSI
1NnoWV 3313ANI NOI1dIif7)S30 35YH3)jnd
06/6Z,(£ 31VO 1N3WAVd
130435 IVAUSddV 319VAVd S1NnCl3V
133dSONd 1NnOW 30 39VllIA
ONft3 'd3M3S 3 I131VM
NOISIAIO M3A3S ONV V31VM
S13nGOWd 93IAM3S W31VM 3139317
ANVdWOI AlddnS 93N901S
':)NI S3I11VI33dS N931N3/t3S
'dX3 OlOHd VH I 0409NIVU
M31SVW1SOd
NOISIAIC Il3M3S ONV 3131VM
MOON3A
15.11969%
GNnl 3nN9A32) W31SAS 9NTVVVd
iS•LL9a9t
**1V1O1#**
NOISIAIO W31SAS 9NIV'lVd
S00I11
SO•Iii
11I9 931VM
133dSONd 1NnOMi 30 39VIIIA
1+:•16269%
741'I6I69$
03b3ON3d S93IAW3S
'lNI 4S31VI3OSSV ONV 14315
Sf?•S££S
05'IZ%
V-964jd-lr-89141P
St919 Zi S
1 -9975 -1r -99H8
£9•+,SI S
V-Z9Z S -I r-99"9
ES•8S
V-0IL£-1r-99H9
�0.047TS
OS'IZS
OOloll? I3
V--86"-1r-99HB
N-CSI03 Hl3V3MNONWO3
91I4k3S 9NINV373
S43ISAS 33NVN91NIVW 3b0OCWWO7
NOISIAIO W31SAS 9NINSYd
+s0'9AS 64Z%
9S•£SSS
00.07567%
99"6075
*98 •L4,7"
*tE•E5£S
#
LI 39V
s*1V1O1#**
95'£455
00'OZ£%
OO.00Z&Z$
99.60ZS
60•ZI%
69'9$
65'93
91'93
99 • L"s
Zi+ `£ PS
00.04?%
+?0.98S 6475
SdWVI!l
SIH Vd
S1NVd
S39OV9
9NISS33OWd WII3
9NISS3l01fd 3 WlI3
9NISS33OWd 3 WlI3
9NISS33UN.d 3 W114
39VtSOd IIID ?H1VM
S3SN3dX3 3 73AVHI
S3SN3dX3 3 13AVSI
1NnoWV 3313ANI NOI1dIif7)S30 35YH3)jnd
06/6Z,(£ 31VO 1N3WAVd
130435 IVAUSddV 319VAVd S1NnCl3V
133dSONd 1NnOW 30 39VllIA
ONft3 'd3M3S 3 I131VM
NOISIAIO M3A3S ONV V31VM
S13nGOWd 93IAM3S W31VM 3139317
ANVdWOI AlddnS 93N901S
':)NI S3I11VI33dS N931N3/t3S
'dX3 OlOHd VH I 0409NIVU
M31SVW1SOd
NOISIAIC Il3M3S ONV 3131VM
MOON3A
VENDOR
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
MID -AMERICA PACKAGING
NOVAK E PARKER INC.
POSTMASTER
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/Z9i90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
COMPOST BAGS
COMPOST BAGS
TAPES
POSTAGE -RECYCLING
ADDITIONAL POSTAGE
$209356.94
PAGE 18
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
SL7,147.67
S3T031.87 $ZO*179.54#
131.80 $31.80
$111.40
%34.ZO $145.60a
***TOTAL** SZ0*356.94
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
DONOHUE E ASSOCIATES* INC. PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $50.00 $50.00
PIERCE FIRE APPARATUS PIERCE ARROW 4 DOOR ENGINE SL59*370,20 $1599370.20*
MEIONERS SEPTIC SERVICE♦ INC. BASIN $95.00 $95.00
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** SI5995I5.ZO
GENERAL FUND S 1599 515.20
####*****I d
COMMUNITY AND C LVIC SERVICES
COMMONWEALTH EDISON 13GZI-JT-1838-A x53.67
BH6T-JT-3858-B $15.33 $69.00
COM14UNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ***TOTAL" xb9.00
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 19
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 3/Z9/90
VENDOR- PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND $69.00
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
FLOOD LOAN 8 L I
FLOOD LOAN INTEREST 04/1/90
FLOOD LOAN INTEREST 0411190
539643.73
S798.76
52iv844.97
***TOTAL**
539643.73'
$39643.73
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL S928sO49.98
DATE RUN 3/29/90
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
TIME RON 11.25.15
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING IO -APPEAR
SUMMARY BY FUND 3/29/90
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
I
GENERAL FUND
$64398tf2.D6
Z2
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
- $110.14
23
COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$19822.06
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
3109692.54
41
RATER E SEWER FUND
$549751.33
46
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND
579163.37
49
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$122x293.06
51
CAPITAL IMPKV. E REPL. FUND
E1:635.69
7i
POLICE PENSION FUND
5379315.34
72
FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
E41.591.48
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$39159.18
95
FLOOD LOAN B E I
$39643.73
TOTAL ALL FUNDS $9289049#98
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, trees, shrubs, and flowers are a great part of the
scenic beauty of our Village and of our Nation, in addition to
providing for good soil and healthy plant life which is essen-
tial to the general economy and agriculture of our Nation; and
WHEREAS, trees, shrubs and plant -life in general are among
God's gifts to many and should be preserved and appreciated;
and
WHEREAS, trees can help offset the greenhouse effect by turn-
ing carbon dioxide, the primary cause of global warming, into
life-giving oxygen, and
WHEREAS, the planting of trees in Mount Prospect will also
help conserve energy use by shading and cooling buildings and
pavement.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim Friday, April 27, 1990, as
ARBOR DAY in the Village of Mount Prospect and urge educators
to teach our youth of the benefits derived from plant life and
encourage the residents of the Village of Mount Prospect to
continue to plant and maintain such plant life throughout the
Village.
FURTHER, I do hereby proclaim that the Village of Mount Pros-
pect shall continue to participate in the Global ReLeaf ef-
fort, to which it dedicates all public tree plantings for the
year 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated: April 3, 1990
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, education is a lifelong process; and
WHEREAS, public education is a community enterprise; and
WHEREAS, the skills, talents and experiences of senior
citizens are untapped resources in many communities; and
WHEREAS, inter -generational cooperation promotes efficient use
of human resources; and
WHEREAS, local residents have a right to be involved in
deciding how the resources of their communities will be used;
and
WHEREAS, community education promotes the use of community
resources and community volunteers in schools, senior citizen
centers and community agencies, the use of human resources to
provide educational opportunity for community residents of all
ages; interagency cooperation to maximize the use of existing
human resources and citizens' involvement in educational
decision-making; and
WHEREAS, the goal of community education is to promote a
sharing, caring, learning community; and
WHEREAS, "A Lifetime of Contribution" is the theme of Senior
Citizens Celebration Day co-sponsored by the High School
District 214 community education program and the Village of
Mount Prospect to encourage and develop programs and
activities to meet the needs of all the citizens in High
School District 214 and the Village of Mount Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of
Mount Prospect, do hereby proclaim May 3, 1990 as "A Lifetime
of Contribution Day" in Mount Prospect in recognition of the
Second Annual Senior Citizen Celebration Day. I call upon the
residents of High School District 214 as well as all the
residents of Mount Prospect to recognize and celebrate the
bonds they have discovered, the partnerships they have formed
and the sense of community they have strengthened through
community education programs.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Dated this 3rd day of April, 1990
P R 0 C L A M A T 1 0 N
WHEREAS, saving lives through organ transplantation has become a
reality. It is possible to transplant kidneys, hearts, livers,
lungs, pancreata, bones, bone marrow, corneas and skin. All of
these life saving transplants.are being performed in our State of
Illinois; and
WHEREAS, there were 466 organs donated in Illinois last year, the
need continues to escalate. Many have already been given the gift
of hearing and sight, or unshackled from dialysis machines, or
given the gift of life itself with new hears or livers. Yet, so
many more continue to wait in vain because there aren't enough
donors; and
WHEREAS, we all have the opportunity to give the gift of life to
so many people in need by making the necessary arrangements to
donate our organs.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, Gerald L. Farley, Mayor of the Village of Mount
Prospect, to hereby proclaim the week of April 22 through April 29
as ORGAN AND TISSUE DONOR AWARENESS WEEK in the Village of Mount
Prospect and I urge everyone to give serious consideration to
joining the organ donation program.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
P r cKa m a t~o n
Whereas, the Mount Prospect Public Library offers all residents new
idmaa, intellectual challenges, vocational inhznnation, relaxation and
entertainment; and
Whereas, access to information through books and other material is
necessity for oninformed citizenry; and
Whereas, long after formal education has ended, the Mount Prospect
Public Ubrarycontinues toteach aswmstrive tounderstand the rapidly
changing world around us; and
Whereas, the Mount Prospect Public Library is one of the Village's most
valuable resources and onimportant and vital part ofthe community;
Now, therefore, |. Gerald L. Farley, Mayor ofthe Village of Mount Pros-
pect, do hereby proclaim the week of April 22-28,1990, as Mount
Prospect Library Week inrecognition ofthe celebration ofNational Li-
brary VVoekaaoboomodthnoughou*thoUnbadStuteaond|u/Oeour
citizens to continue to make use ofthis great Library for their educa-
tional, recreational and informational needs, and I commend the trus-
tees and librarians who provide this service.
Gerald L Farley
Mayor
Dated: April 3,1990
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A RECAPTURE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN HELEN PATE
AND THE. VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, Helen Pate is the first owner to develop property commonly
known as the Pate Subdivision, and as such is required to install
a water main and roadway; and
WHEREAS, the installation of the water main and roadway will
benefit future development within the general area and inasmuch as
Helen Pate has paid for this improvement and in accordance with
Section 22.701 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect it has been
determined that it would be in the best interests of the Village
to, enter into a Recapture Agreement in order for Helen Pate to
recapture a portion of the cost in this improvement.
WHEREAS, the Recapture Agreement being the subject of this
ordinance shall apply to the those properties legally described as
follows:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 in Pate's Resubdivision, being a
resubdivision of part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests
of the Village would be served by entering into a Recapture
Agreement with Helen Pate, being the developer of property commonly
known as the Pate Subdivision, said Recapture Agreement is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". The cost of
said Recapture, as determined by the Village Engineer, as it
applies to future development is set forth in Exhibit "C" attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION TWO: That the Village shall enter into a Recapture
Agreement with the Helen Pate upon receipt of an executed Deed for
said water main and roadway construction.
SECTION TWO: That a certified copy of this Ordinance and Recapture
Agreement shall be recorded in the office of the Recorder of Deeds
or Registrar of Titles, whichever is applicable.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
PA-1-MR043
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
RECAPTURE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered into this day of
1990, by and between the Village of Mount
Prospect, a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois,
hereinafter referred to as "Village" and Helen Pate hereinafter
referred to as "Owner", upon the mutual covenants and conditions
expressed hereto:
W I T N E S S E T H•
WHEREAS, the Village has adopted a municipal ordinance
requiring the installation of a water main, appurtenant facilities,
and a portion of roadway hereinafter referred to as "Facilities",
for property owned by owners, which land and territory is
hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property and legally
described as follows:
Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 in Pate's Resubdivision, being a
resubdivision of part of the East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of
Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, in Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Facilities are to be dedicated to the Village for the
use by the Village for the purpose of a water main and public
roadway; and
WHEREAS, the Village and the Owners agree that the contract herein
is for and in the best interests of all concerned would be served
by entering into a Recapture Agreement with owners, in accordance
with Section 22.702.0 of Chapter 22 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
hereinafter setforth, it is hereby agreed by the parties hereto:
1. Owner do warrants that all labor and material costs and all
other charges relating to said water main and roadway and the
installation thereof have been paid and that all necessary
consents have been granted and that all installations have
been made in accordance with local and state standards.
Additionally, the village is hereby assigned any right that
the owner may have with respect to any right of whatever kind
or nature to cover maintenance, repair and replacement of
"Facilities". sanitary sewer main have been granted.
2. That the property owners of Lots 2, 3 and 4 in Walter A.
Johnson's Subdivision of Lot 12, C. A. Goelz Prospect Gardens,
a subdivision of the northeast 1/4 of the southwest 1/4 of
Section 35, Township 42 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, recorded January 6, 1949 as Document
14473989, Torrens Document 1252929, or a part thereof, shall
have the right to connect to the water main provided that
Owners be entitled to collect the sum of one -eleventh (1/11)
of the total installed cost, and the owner be entitled to
collect from the owner of Lot 4 a proportionate cost of street
improvements. Other pertinent details and obligations of this
agreement are in Exhibit "C" attached, being a memo dated
February 20, 1990, as revised, from the Engineering
Coordinator.
3. Whenever the owners of adjacent property being the subject of
this Agreement make application to the Village for connection
to said water main the Village shall use its best efforts to
inform said applicant that the appropriate aforestated fee is
due and owing owners.
Recapture Agreement
Page 2 of 2
Prior to issuance of any such permit to applicant, the Village
shall ascertain whether the applicant has paid Owner
accordingly by sending notice by regular mail of such
application to Owner at the following address:
5. The Village shall not be obligated to deny any such permit to
any such applicant merely because said connection fee has not
been paid to Owners. However, the Village shall have no duty
beyond the aforementioned notice requirement with respect to
collection of the fee and the Owner shall not make the Village
a party to any law suit for collection of said fee.
6. The right of Owners to recovery and collection (by any legal
means including civil suit against such applicant) of any tap -
on fees for connection to the said sanitary sewer main shall
inure to it from the date hereof through December 31, 1998,
and thereafter owners and/or their successors or assigns in
interest shall have no further right to collect the aforesaid
fees and any obligation herein of the Village to aid Owners
to collect said fees shall cease.
7. owners do hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the
Village, its officers, agents, employees, successors and
assigns, from any and all claims or damages to real or
personal property, and from injuries or death suffered to any
persons by reason of the said sanitary sewer main, its
construction or installation and for any attempt on the part
of the Village to enforce the payment of recapture fees
herein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their
hands and seals this - day of 1-1 1990.
ns2fl1*144
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT:
Village President
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 215 EAST PROSPECT A
,VENUE
WHEREAS, Parenti & Raffaelli, Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from certain
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 215 East Prospect Avenue
(hereinafter referred to as Subject Property) , legally described
as:
Lots 10 and 17 in J. A. Weber Addition to Mount Prospect,
being a subdivision in the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of
Section 12, Township 41 North, Range 11, East of the Third
Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek variations as follows:
1. Section 14.2202.B.3 to allow an ill side yard from the
building to the west property line instead of 301 and a 25.561 side
yard from the existing building to the east property line instead
of 301;
2. Section 14.2202.A to allow the existing front yard of
29.571 instead of 301;
3. Section 2202.0 to allow a 151 rear yard instead of 401
for a new paved parking lot;
4. Section 14.2203.A to allow a lot size of 2.285 acres
instead of 4 acres;
5. Section 14.3012.B to allow two 121 x 351 loading docks
instead of two 121 x 501 loading docks;
6. Section 14.3012 to allow 61 parking spaces instead of the
required 66;
7. Section 14.2202.E and Section 14.3018 to allow a zero
foot distance from the property on the east property line for
parking instead of 101, and 151 from the south property line
instead of 301; and
8. Section 14.2203.B to allow 84% impervious surface lot
coverage (3,684 square feet over the maximum), instead of 80%.
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 15-V-90 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 22nd day of
February, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 7th day of February,
1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested and have determined that the same satisfies the standards
set forth in Section 14.605 of Article VI of Chapter 14 of the
Village Code and the Board of Trustees further find that it would
be in the best interests of the Village to grant the variations as
specified herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
ZBA 15-V-90
Page 2 of 2
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant the following:
1. A variation from Section 14.2202.8.3 to allow an 111 side
yard from the building to the west property line instead of 301 and
a 25.561 side yard from the existing building to the east property
line instead of 301;
2. A variation from Section 14.2202.A to allow the existing
front yard of 29.571 instead of 301;
3. A variation from Section 2202.0 to allow a 151 rear yard
instead of 401 for a new paved parking lot;
4. A variation from Section 14.2203.A to allow a lot size
of 2.285 acres instead of 4 acres;
5.. A variation from Section 14.3012.B to allow two 121 x 350
loading docks instead of two 121 x 501 loading docks;
6. A variation from Section 14.3012 to allow 61 parking
spaces instead of the required 66;
7. Variations from Section 14.2202.E and Section 14.3018 to
allow a zero foot distance from the property on the east property
line for parking instead of 101, and 151 from the south property
line instead of 301; and
8. A variation from Section 14.2203.B to allow 84%
impervious surface lot coverage (3,684 square feet over the
maximum), instead of 80%.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be null and void and of not
force and effec-- whatsoever until after its passage, approval,
publication in pamphlet form, as provided by law, and such time as
an accurate plan resubdividing the subject property described
hereinabove is recorded with the Recorder of Deeds or registered
with the Registrar of Titles of Cook County, whichever is
applicable
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990.
Gerald L. Farley
ATTEST: Village President
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 18
ENTITLED 'TRAFFIC CODE' OF THE VILLAGE CODE
OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 18.2001 entitled "Speed Restrictions"
of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
as amended, is hereby further amended by adding in proper
alphabetcial sequece Autumn Lane, Eric, Harvest Lane and Neil with
the speed limit of 25 MPH; so that hereinafter said Section 18.2001
shall include the following:
Speed
It Name of Direction of Limit
Street Tra, ic Movement MPH Description
Autumn Ln. North & Southbound 25 Entire Jurisdiction
Eric Ave.
North
& Southbound
25
Enitire Jurisdiction
Harvest Ln
East &
Westbound
25
Entire Jurisdiction
Neil Ave.
North
& southbound
25
Entire Jurisdiction"
SECTION TWO: That Section 18.2005 entitled "No Parking, Standing
or Parking" of Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the
following, in proper alphabetical sequence; so that hereinafter
said Section 18.2005 shall include the following:
Name of
Street
Harvest Ln
Henry St.
Highland Ave.
Nordic Rd.
Side Between
of Street Hours of
North & South At Any Time
North At Any Time
North & South At Any Time
West At Any Time
Description
The first 450
feet east of
Business
Center Drive
The first 35 feet
east of Owen St.
The first 35 feet
west of Main St.
The south 60 feet
of the north 600
feet south of
Algonquin Rd
SECTION TWO,: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form the manner provide by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
, 1990.
I
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER -
SUBJECT: ZBA-17-SU-90, ROSENOW INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
LOCATION: 2200 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
DATE: MARCH 13, 1990
The applicant appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 22, 1990 to
request the following:
1. A Special Use/Planned Unit Development for the creation of a five -lot 1-1, Light
Industrial Park. Currently, this parcel is a one lot, three -unit condominium light
industrial park. The average proposed lot size is just over one acre. Variations to
the, P.U.D. standards are also requested as part of the Special Use including:
a. A waiver of the common ownership requirement for a Planned Unit
Development.
b. The perimeter yard setbacks.
Mr. Stefaniak, the attorney representing the petitioner, explained the background of this
case to the Board. In 1986, this parcel was rezoned to 1-1 and granted variations for a 20
perimeter yard setback along the north property line and a 10 foot setback along the south
property line, along with a variation to the parking space requirements which meet today's
standard. Conditions were attached to those variations including:
1. No outside storage of equipment or materials on the site.
2. Petitioner cooperating with staff in the development of a parking plan, landscape
plan and water detention plan.
The property was originally set up as a three unit condominium. J & L Industrial Supplies
already occupies Unit #1. The remainder of the property was to be developed as mini -
warehouses at the far west end and the Rosenow Roofing facility on the south half of the
property. However, those plans have changed. Mr. Rosenow, the owner of the remainder
of the parcel has found difficulty marketing the project as it was approved in 1986.
Therefore, they are proposing to abolish the condominium ownership and subdivide the
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
March 13, 1990
parcel into five separate lots of record. The most apparent change between the 1986 site
plan and this new proposal is that Unit #2, as exists, will be split into three separate lots
of record. The average proposed lot size is just over one acre. A portion of the private
street and detention areas has already been completed in order to serve J & L.
Mr. Lenit, a land planner representing the petitioner, went over the specifics of the site
plan. He stated that it has been his experience that the 4 acre minimum in our Code is too
large for small industrial users. The one plus acre size, as shown on this site plan, should
be acceptable. Mr. Lenit presented an exhibit to the Zoning Board showing building
envelopes on each individual new lot. In some cases, these buildings are located 10 feet
away from the south property line. Mr. Unit said the 10 foot setback along the south
property line would be necessary since they plan to provide a 30 foot front yard setback.
The petitioner also committed to appearing before the Sign Review Board in order to offer
a P.U.D. sign package.
Staff informed the Zoning Board of Appeals that the smaller acreage of the proposed lots
does not present a problem based upon:
1. The fact that Lake Center Plaza and Kensington Business Center have many lots
that are less than 4 acres in size and are acceptable.
2. By approving a Planned Unit Development, we will ensure proper maintenance
and sign control for each individual lot.
3. A 4 acre minimum lot size seems to be too big for smaller industrial users.
It was noted that the petitioner is proposing the same perimeter setbacks as originally
approved in 1986 which are 20 feet on the north and 10 feet on the south.
All other I-1 District requirements, such as building height, floor area ratio, lot coverage
should be observed for each individual lot. The petitioner noted that all utilities and the
street will remain in private ownership and maintenance. He agreed to all concerns set
forth in the Village staff comments.
The Board members then discussed the following issues at length:
1. Whether the one acre lot size is appropriate for this parcel. It was noted that
other business parks have lots just over 2 acres in size. It would be possible to
combine two of these proposed one acre lots to have a comparable lot size.
2. There was some discussion with regards to the hardship for variations. Some
comments were made that it was a self-made hardship resulting from too large a
building on a one acre lot size, thereby reducing the rear and side yard setback
requirements as recommended by staff.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 3
March 13, 1990
After some discussion, the Board then decided to approve the Special Unit/Planned
Development with the following conditions:
1. Each lot, except Lot #1, provide a 30 foot front yard.
2. A 20 foot perimeter yard be required on the north property line and 10 foot yard
on the south with a 20 foot on the west.
3. A 15 foot side yard required for buildings on each lot except for Lot #1. A 10
foot side yard for parking on each one of these lots. If the building height is over
20 feet, then an additional I foot building setback for each foot of building height
must be provided in the affected side yard.
4. No outside storage will be allowed on any lots.
5. The petitioner will cooperate with staff with regards to an acceptable landscape
plan, site plan and drainage plan for each lot.
This motion was approved unanimously. There were no objectors present in the audience
to voice any concerns.
If the Village Board approves the zoning requests, the applicant will then'proceed to the
Plan Commission with a plat of subdivision.
PB:hg
Approved:
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 17 -SU -90
PEITI ONER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Hearing Date: February 22, 1990
Rosenow Investment Properties
2200 South Busse Road
February 7, 1990
A Special Use/Planned Unit Development is
proposed for a five -lot Light Industrial
subdivision and the following variations to the
P.U.D. standards: A waiver of the common
ownership requirement for a Planned Unit
Development; and the perimeter yard setbacks.
Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
Gil Basnik
Mr. Alan Stefaniak, Attorney representing the petitioner, gave a brief summary of the
history of the project. In 1986, a rezoning to 1-1 and variations were granted for a one lot,
3 unit condominium. This proposal is slightly different than the approved site plan. He
then informed the Board that the J & L building on Unit #1 is already constructed and
operational. Mr. Rosenow, the owner of the remainder of the parcel, is having difficulty
marketing it as per the approved site plan. The petitioner is requesting that the original
condominium association be abandoned and that the site be developed according to a
Planned Unit Development. Mr. Stefaniak stated that the owner is now seeking to create
a five -lot subdivision with the individual property owners forming an association. The
association would be responsible for maintaining the detention facilities private roadway and
other common elements. He noted that the private road serving the site is listed as an
outloi.
Mr. Steve Lenit, land planner representing the petitioner, stated that the subject site is too
narrow, creating a hardship in the development of this parcel. He stated the width of the
parcel is approximately 400 feet. Mr. Lenit stated that the variations being requested will
not have a negative impact on adjoining properties and that adequate light, ventilation and
ZBA-I7-SU-90
February 22, 1990
Page 2 of 3
drainage will remain adequate around the site. He noted that the proposed plan is in
compliance with the Village's Comprehensive Plan, is part of a previously approved
variation, and is being requested because of the irregular shape and narrowness of the site.
He added that one of the variation requests, for a 10 foot side yard on the south side,
would be adequate for fire protection, drainage, and would allow for reasonable
development of the property. He added that the petitioner is willing to trim up trees on
the north side and to comply with screening outside storage. He stated that a letter from
the Project Design Engineer regarding drainage has been submitted to the Village.
Mr. Lenit also noted that the petitioner is requesting a reduction of the minimum lot size
for the site from 4 acres to 1 acre. He stated that market conditions and site constraints
create a hardship and prevent the site from being developed on 4 acre lots.
Paul Bednar, Planner, commented upon the case. He stated that a smaller lot size does not
pose a problem based upon three facts:
1. Lake Center Plaza and Kensington have some lots smaller than 4 acres;
2. A Planned Unit development will ensure proper maintenance and sign control;
3. A 4 acre minimum lot size seems too big for smaller users.
The same perimeter yard setbacks which were approved in 1986 are now requested. The
staff recommends the same setbacks for each individual lot as was approved for Lake
Center Plaza, including 15 foot side yards (10 foot for parking), 20 foot rear yards and 30
foot front yards. With regards to the south side perimeter yard, Mr. Bednar said that a
10 foot setback for parking and a 20 foot setback for a building may be acceptable. It was
also noted that outside storage was not permitted in the 1986 plans for this facility and that
should be a condition of any new approval.
Mr. Brian Carrol, from Baird & Warner, explained the marketing conditions for the site.
He noted that the proposed development is intended to serve the smaller industrial users.
Mr. Petrucelli stated that he felt the Board should keep the Village's higher standards and
have the petitioner return with a more specific site plan. He expressed his concern of the
variations on the perimeter yard and side yards. He also mentioned that he felt the
petitioner has self-imposed hardships, especially if they relate to the number of buildings
on the site. Many Board members agreed.
After further discussion, Mrs. Brothers moved, seconded by Mr. Lannon, to approve the
Special Use/Planned Unit Development along with variations to the perimeter yard and
ownership as follows:
1. A 15 foot side yard be approved except to allow parking up to 10 feet from the side
yard, also that buildings over 20 feet in height be required to add l foot setback for
every 2 feet in height;
ZBA-17-SU-90
February 22, 1990
Page 3 of 3
2. A 20 foot setback be required on the north property line, a 10 foot setback on the
south property line and a 20 foot setback along the Northwest Tollway property line;
3. The developer cooperate with the Village in the preparation of landscaping and site
Plan;
4. These requirements pertain only to Lots 2, 3, 4, and 5 as shown on Exhibit A;
5. The developer abide by all conditions stated in the staffs comments;
6. There will be no outside storage.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Brothers,Cassidy, Lannon, O'May, Petrucelli
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. .
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board.
Michael E. Sims
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPE&
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS C RMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER,-Q"�—=o
SUBJECT: ZBA-17-SU-90, ROSENOW INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
LOCATION: 2200 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1990
The applicant is requesting a Special Use/Planned Unit Development for the creation of
a five -lot 1-1, Light Industrial Park. Currently, this parcel is a three -unit condominium light
industrial park, 60% vacant. The average proposed lot size is just over one acre.
Variations to the P.U.D. standards are also requested for the following:
1. A waiver of the common ownership requirement for a Planned Unit
Development.
2. The perimeter yard setbacks.
Both Engineering and Inspection Services Departments note the following:
1. Sanitary sewers, storm sewers, detention basins, and watermains will remain in
private ownership and maintenance. Easements should be granted for access to
valves, hydrants and service valves. There are additional easements for watermain
on Lot No. 2 that should be shown. No structures including parking lot should be
built in an easement.
2. A grading plan for each lot shall be submitted prior to the development of a lot.
All lots shall drain to an existing detention area. More detention may be provided
on each lot.
3. The cul-de-sac bulb dimension must Ix: verified by the Fire Department. Turning
-movements for emergency vehicles must be substantiated in this cul-de-sac.
4. If more impervious area is to be created than originally stipulated on the M.S.D.
Permit No. 87625 (6.86 AC) the restrictor size may need to be changed.
5. All Development Code and Building Code regulations shall apply to each lot.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
February 14, 1990
This property was annexed to the Village and subsequently rezoned to I-1, Light Industrial
in 1986. Ordinance No. 3656 was approved in June, 1986 by the Village Board granting
variations for a condominium light industrial park. A copy of this Ordinance and site plan
is attached for your review. In essence, variations were granted for a 20 foot setback along
the north property line, a 10 foot setback along the south property line, and parking space
requirements as currently required- Conditions were attached to these variations, including:
1. No outside storage of equipment or materials be permitted on the site.
2. The petitioner cooperate with the Planning and Zoning Department concerning
the development of a suitable parking plan, landscape plan, and storm water
detention plan.
This property was originally intended to be developed as a three -unit condominium. J &
L Industrial Supply has already built their building on Unit 1 of the condominium parcel
located at the north end of the property. A portion of the private street and detention
areas have already been completed in order to serve J & L Industries. The remainder of
the condominium property was to be developed as mini -warehouses on the far west end,
and a Rosenow Roofing facility on the south half of the property.
Currena Proposal
Rosenow's Investment Properties is now proposing to abolish the condominium ownership
and subdivide this parcel into separate lots of record. The most apparent change between
the unit boundaries and the lot boundaries proposed is evident when comparing the plat
of survey to the proposed site plan. Unit No. 2, as it exists, is proposed to be split into
three separate lots of record, lots 3, 4, and 5. The average proposed lot size is just over
one acre. Representatives of the petitioner should explain to the Board the reasons behind
this proposal. Staff has no objection to the proposed change in ownership from
condominium to individual lots of record.
The average size of proposed lot being just over one acre is less than the 4 acre minimum
required in an I-1 District. However, we do not have an objection based upon the fact that:
1. A 4 -acre minimum seems too large for small industrial users.
2. Both the Lake Center Plaza and Kensington Business Center have many lots that
-aren't 4 -acres (IhesrnatlerDnesareabout 2-+ acres) and they -doWl vreateTrobierns.
3. The P.U.D. designation will ensure proper maintenance and sip control. It is
to the Village's benefit that a P.U.D. be established in order to maintain control of
the small lot development.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
February 14, 1990
A Planned Unit Development, would require perimeter yard setbacks oaf 25 -feet on the
north and south property lines and 20 feet to the west. The petitioner is proposing the
same perimeter setbacks as originally approved in 1986, which are 20 feet on the north,
and 10 feet on the south property line. We would recommend that the Zoning Board
consider the normal 1-1 setback requirement standards for each individual lot, which would
include the following:
1. Front yards (along the private drive) of 30 feet.
2. Side yards of 30 feet between industrial lots (parking could be allowed up to 10
feet from the side property line).
3. Rear yards (backing up to the adjacent residential) of 40 feet (parking can be as
close as 30 feet from a transitional rear property line).
As you can see if the above requirements were applied, it would be much more restrictive
than the setbacks allowed previously. It would seem reasonable that this development of
small industrial users would not have to provide the strict 1-1 setbacks for each lot, nor is
it required since this project is proposed as a PU.D. However, we recommend that any
approval of this proposal be conditioned on individual lot setbacks similar to that of "ke
Center Plaza.
1. Allow 15 foot side yards instead of 30 feet. If the building height is over 15 feet
then an additional 1 foot setback is provided for every 2 feet of building height.
2. A 20 foot rear yard setback instead of 40 feet when adjacent to a residential
district. Additional landscaping should be installed.
3. Thirty foot front yard setbacks.
Other I-1 District requirements, such as, building height, floor area ratio, lot coverage
should be observed.
In summary, the proposed change in ownership (from condominium to single lots) and the
lot sizes do not pose a problem if a P.U.D. is established to maintain control of signs and
maintenance and if the development of each individual lot meets standards set forth above.
PB:hg
'-riLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL T
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-14-V-90, MICHAEL MADAY
LOCATION:
910 SOUTH OWEN STREET
DATE:
MARCH 28, 1990
The applicant appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 22 to request the
following variations:
1. Section 14.3016 in order to allow a 24 foot wide driveway for a one -car garage
instead of 15 feet.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot setback for a parking pad instead of
30 feet.
3. Section 14.1102.A to allow 37% impervious surface coverage in the front yard
instead of 35,9o.
Mr. Maday stated that when he purchased the home there was an existing 24 foot wide
driveway that was in disrepair and he replaced it with concrete. He replaced this existing
driveway without obtaining the necessary variations. He presented evidence to the Board
that only two homes out of 22 in the neighborhood have 15 foot wide driveways. The
remainder have driveways wider than 15 feet for one -car garages. This evidence was
verified by the staff at the hearing. The Board then voted to approve all variations
unanimously 4-0. There were no neighbors present to object to this proposal.
PB:hg
Approved:
b. k
David M. Clements, Director
11
h-QL: (312) 726-131'3 �.jt.j910 11. Ck"1rofq,uct,
(A'j)ip 1,120986
ENGINEERING
LAND SURVEYING
D",r "r Q1 IJI? LIF Y
bejj�,, n sA'divkiOn of (hat P�WL (,f, the VXst tvllf of the vusf, half of, 010
Mmpe IL or L1,,, ,bird Princiml Merid, Jvi;w 4)rLh of
r iRjjjrj.,r of Sectior, 1.3. lo%,i)shit) 141 Nk)rdi. ,, v cc(, P, 1Cj (_�_q,q), IL, 11))9 Is Lk)c-1A11cnL 3001,973 -ccordim, tO
Lhc terlhlc (if Golf Rood ;15 Per plit cf oe6jCaLil
plac of sjid CILarbrook Estates registered in the office of the ftSiSItnir (if 'naes of ux)k County, Illinois, on
AL4%ust 21, 1956'as Document ':1690611 -
-:5'
e'K'ts--7- A--.244>
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 14-V-90
Hearing Date: March 22, 1990
PETITIONER:
Michael Maday
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
910 South Owen Street
PUBLICATION DATE:
March 6, 1990
REQUEST:
Variations from: Section 14.3016 to allow a 24'
wide driveway for a one -car garage instead of
15'; Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot
setback for a parking pad instead of 30'; Section
14.1102.A to allow 37% impervious surface
coverage in the front yard instead of 35%.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Gil Basnik introduced this case as being variations to allow a 24' wide driveway
for a one -car garage instead of 15'; a zero foot setback for a parking pad instead of 30;
and 37% impervious surface coverage in the front yard instead of 35%.
The petitioner, Michael Maday, presented his case stating that the 24 foot wide driveway
was in place when he purchased the home. He further stated that it was a blacktop
driveway in disrepair and he wanted to replace it with concrete. He explained that in his
neighborhood there were only 2 homes out of 22 that had 15 foot driveways. He further
mentioned that he spoke to his neighbors about the improvement he was proposing to the
driveway and none of his neighbors objected. He alluded to some patio work which was
done in 1988 and which required a variation, but did stipulate that he received a permit for
that patio.
Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, acknowledged the majority of driveways in the
neighborhood as being wider than 15 feet with only one -car garages. He clarified the issue
of the permit for patio work done in mid -1988, by explaining that a permit was issued,
however, the work done on the patio was more extensive than what the permit allowed and
ZBA-14-V-90
Page 2 of 2
that constituted the need for the variation. Mr. Bednar further stated that, since there were
already so many homes in the neighborhood with wider driveways, he did not feel that this
24 foot wide driveway would negatively impact the neighborhood.
There was a brief discussion as to the negligence on the part of the contractor to obtain
a permit for this driveway, and Chairman Basnik instructed Paul Bednar to have someone
notify the contractor to apply for permits before he does any future work for the Village.
Mr. Lannon, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, voted to grant variations from Section 14.3016
to allow a 24' wide driveway for a one -car garage; Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot
setback for a parking pad; and Section 14.1102.A to allow 37% impervious surface coverage
in the front yard as per petitioner's Exhibit No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Cassidy, Brothers, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 4-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary,
VYLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEi_
SUBJECT: ZBA-14-V-90, MICHAEL MADAY
LOCATION: 910 SOUTH OWEN STREET
DATE: MARCH 14, 1990
REQUE
The case has been continued from the February 22 hearing date since the original
submission did not include one necessary variation. The applicant is requesting the
following variations:
1. Section 14.3016 in order to keep a new 24' wide driveway rather than the 15'
Code allows for a one -car garage.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow for a minimum front yard setback of zero feet for
a parking pad instead of the required 30'.
3. Section 14.1102.A to allow 37% impervious surface coverage in the front yard
instead of 35%.
The Police Chief notes that parking is a problem in this neighborhood. The Inspection
Services Department indicate that a permit was not issued before this driveway was
installed. It is also noted that there was patio work done in mid -1988 which was also done
without a permit and required a variation, which was since granted. The Engineering
Department notes that the trenches along the concrete drive should be backfilled as soon
as possible to prevent injury. No other comments or objections were received regarding this
case.
The applicants live in a single family home typical of other homes in this neighborhood.
They have a one -car attached garage at the north end of their home. Mr. Maday recently
replaced his driveway at a 24 foot width. Since there is only a one -car garage on the
property, Code limits the width of the drive to 15 feet. Therefore, variations are required
not only for the driveway width but also for the parking pad in the front yard and the lot
coverage which exceeds 35% in the front yard.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-14-V-90
Upon a brief inspection of the neighborhood, we found other homes with one -car attached
garages that had driveways wider than 15 feet. Some of these driveways appeared to be
between 18' and 21' wide with a parking pad in the front yard similar to the one proposed.
This particular 24' wide drive appears to be the widest in the neighborhood. Given the fact
that there are other drives in the neighborhood similar but not as wide as this one, and also
assuming that this particular drive had existed at this width before Mr. Maday reconstructed
it, it should not have a significant impact upon the neighborhood. The petitioner should
satisfy the Board as to why be did not receive a permit for this work.
In summary, Mr. Maday has already installed a 24' wide driveway which necessitates three
variations in order to keep it. Given the facts that there are other similar drives in the
neighborhood, this particular driveway should not have a significant impact on the
neighborhood.
PB:hg
ILL AGE OF MOUNT PROSPLtT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-18-V-90, KEITH AND LAURY YOUNGQUIST
LOCATION:
7 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
DATE:
MARCH 28, 1990
Mr. Youngquist appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 22, 1990 to
request the following variations:
Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a 4' separation between a new room addition
and the existing detached garage instead of 10 feet.
2. Section 14.1102.E to allow 47.5% lot coverage with impervious surface instead
of 45%.
Mr. Youngquist stated that his home is small and situated on a narrow and long lot. He
is proposing a 775 square foot addition at the rear of the house for a kitchen expansion and
family room. He further stated that his existing garage is located such that it is in the
middle of his rear yard, close to the proposed addition. It is in good condition and does
not want to move the garage further back to create more buildable space off the rear of
the house. Along with this addition, he desires to install a 12'x16' patio which thereby
exceeds the allowable impervious surface coverage by 2-1/2%, or approximately 200 square
feet. Mr. Youngquist does not want to reduce the size of the addition or eliminate the
patio in order to meet the lot coverage maximum, but he wishes to retain his original
proposal.
The Planning staff verified the facts presented by Mr. Youngquist, such as, this home being
1500 square feet, on a long and narrow lot and the garage being close to the rear of the
house. Mr. Lannon expressed his opinion to the Zoning Board members regarding the lot
surface coverage on 50 foot wide lots. He felt that, in the older parts of the Village,
exceeding the impervious lot surface coverage was unavoidable. Mr. Basnik felt that there
was good reason to stay within the lot surface coverage maximum, particularly on these
smaller lots in town. Drainage was Mr. Basnik's main concern.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
March 28, 1990
The Zoning Board voted on the two variation requests separately. The first variation
regarding the 4 foot separation between the garage and room addition was approved
unanimously 5-0, subject to the condition that 5/8" Class X drywall be installed in the
existing garage. The second variation regarding the 47.5% lot coverage was denied by a
vote of 3 ayes and 2 nays. There were no neighbors or objectors present at this hearing to
express their concerns. A super majority vote of the Village Board will be required to
approve the lot coverage variation.
PB:hg
Approved:
)I . M. Ct�
David M. Clements, Director
VLA I Ul- IZ�U" V t- I
LO 19 N t In11I.Ce 7 In ,Rv5A0,I -S FASTEF.N ADDITION in the Fast 112 of Section 12,
ro.n.hip 41
crth. , ',Ong. U East the Third Princijul ::rr I,U n.
NtFA of )4evi ,s=ToP
25 YfAts OLD.
o;fo*
law 10
cow.
N
A9
V-. 7
'46 TAL-
arivemAy TO
4—Y --Al z�7..ft'
i f
ot;f I f
f. ql ,
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 18-V-90
Hearing Date: March 22, 1990
PETITIONER:
Keith and Laury Youngquist
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
7 South Edward Street
PUBLICATION DATE:
March 6, 1990
REQUEST:
Variations from: Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a
4' separation between the garage and a room
addition instead of 10'; Section 14.1102.13 to
allow 47.5% lot coverage instead of 45%.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
Chairman Gil Basnik introduced this case as being a variation to allow a 4' separation
between the garage and a room addition instead of 10' and a variation to allow 47.5% lot
coverage instead of 45%.
Keith Youngquist, petitioner, presented his case stating that his home is very small on a
narrow and long lot, and he is proposing to construct a 775 square foot addition. He
mentioned that his kitchen was only 10' X W and he could not consider building an
addition smaller that the one he proposed. He further stated that his garage is in good
condition and be would not want to move the garage further back and lose the mature
trees he has in the rear of his property. He is an architect by profession and when he
made the plans for his addition he assumed that the floor area ratio would govern the
overall availability to build on his lot He explained that he had a dated Zoning Ordinance
which did not address the impervious surface coverage regulation when he was working
on his plans for this addition. He explained that next to his family room he wanted a 12'
X 16' patio and therefore, exceeded the allowed impervious surface coverage by 2 1/2%,
or approximately 200 square feet. He understands that he does have an option of reducing
the size of the addition or eliminating the patio, but wishes to remain with his original
proposal.
z.,dA-18-V-90
March 22, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Paul Bednar, Planner representing the Village, stated that the home is typical of the homes
in the neighborhood, that it is on a narrow, long lot and that the proximity of the garage
to the house makes any large addition impossible without a variation. He further stated
that there would be a lesser impact if a smaller addition, such as 600 square feet, were
proposed, and mentioned that this should be addressed.
Mr. Bednar suggested to the Board members that, if' they were to recommend approval
of this addition, they should condition it upon the installation of 5/8" Class X drywall in the
garage for safety reasons.
There was some discussion regarding the impact of impervious lot surface coverage. Mr.
Lannon mentioned that the Zoning Board members envisioned these types'of variations
surfacing when they reduced the impervious lot surface coverage from 5017-c to 45%. He
felt that most of the homes in the older part of the Village, are already exceeding the
maximum allowed impervious surface coverage, and felt that in many cases this was
unavoidable.
Chairman Basnik felt that there was a reason for reducing impervious surface coverage,
particularly in town where the lots are smaller, and did not feel that this issue should be
disregarded. He felt that the maximum impervious surface coverage should be maintained,
particularly in areas where the lots are only 50 feet in. width. Mention was made that
drainage is also impeded when impervious surface coverage is maximized in an area where
there is a lack of open space. There is a vacant lot next to this property and Mr. Basnik
felt that, if it wasn't vacant, the resident living there would be objecting to this proposal.
Mr. Cassidy, seconded by Mr. Lannon, moved to grant a variation from Section 14.102.B.1
to allow a 4' separation between the garage and a room addition subject to the condition
that 5/8" Class X drywall be installed in the existing garage, as per petitioner's Exhibit No.
1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brothers, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
Mr. Petrucelli, seconded by Mr. Lannon, moved to grant the petitioner's request for a
variation from Section 14.1102.E to allow 47.5% lot coverage as per Exhibit No. 1.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, PetrucellL Brothers
NAYS: Cassidy, Basnik
Since 4 votes are needed for approval, the motion failed by a vote of 3-2.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNERI-- u...,.1
SUBJECT: ZBA-18-V-90, KEITH AND LAURY YOUNGQUIST
LOCATION: 7 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
DATE: MARCH 12, 1990
The applicants are requesting the following two variations:
1. Section 14.102.13.1 to allow a 4' separation between a new room addition
and the existing detached garage. Code normally requires a 10' separation.
2. Section 14.1102.E to allow 47.5% of the lot to be covered with impervious
surface instead of the maximum 45%.
The Engineering Department notes that a grading plan must be submitted prior to any
permit being issued. The existing drainage pattern must not be altered. The location of
downspouts must conform to new Village ordinance. They also note that the applicant
should check to see if the old septic tank or catch basin is in the way of the proposed
addition. Inspection Services notes that building plans will be required. The interior of the
garage should be lined with 5/8" Class X drywall for fire safety reasons, if this 4 foot
separation is approved. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case.
The Youngquist's live in an older single family neighborhood on a narrow but long lot.
They have a 1500 square foot home which is typical of other homes in the neighborhood.
A detached garage is located 26 feet away from the rear of the house, and at least 40 feet
from the rear property line. The garage is in good condition. Besides the house, garage,
and driveway, the rest of the property is open landscaped area with several large trees in
the rear yard.
The Youngquist's are proposing to add 775 square feet of living space to the rear end of
the home. The configuration of the addition, as proposed, would come as close as 4 feet
from the existing garage. Also, this room addition along with the 12' X 16' new patio will
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-18-V-90
increase the total impervious surface on this lot to 47.5%. All other zoning requirements,
such as Floor Area Ratio, yard setbacks, and building height are conforming. Code requires
a 10 foot separation between detached structures such as garages and the principal home,
mainly for light and air circulation and fire safety reasons. There are no encroachments
into the 5 foot side yard.
As evidenced by the site plan, the existing detached garage being located only 26 feet away
from the home limits the size of any building addition if Code requirements are met. The
petitioners should address the need for this size of addition. If the addition were
approximately 600 square feet, it could probably meet the 10 foot separation requirement
between the garage and the addition. It would also decrease the impervious surface to the
maximum of 45%.
An option of moving the garage further back on the property in order to open up more
buildable area for a room addition, would require removing a large mature tree and cover
more of the lot with impervious surface. As noted in the Village staff comments, neither
the Fire Department nor Inspection Services have an objection to this 4 foot separation if
the approval is conditioned upon the requirement of installation of fire -rated drywall in the
existing garage. Similar requests for reduced separation between room additions and
existing detached garages have been approved in the past several years. In these cases,
the garage was located 26 feet from the house yet the homes were generally of smaller
sizes.
In summary, the Youngquists must address the proposed size and configuration of their
addition. If this proposal is approved, we would recommend a condition be attached
that fire -rated drywall be installed in the garage. Reducing the size of the addition could
increase the separation between the house and the garage. The impervious surface
coverage of the lot could be reduced to the Code maximum of 45% if either the addition
size were decreased or the patio was eliminated. Since the garage is in good condition, and
a large fir tree is located at the rear of the garage we would not recommend moving the
garage back on the lot to open up more buildable space.
PB:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPEC"T"
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO:
JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM:
PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT:
ZBA-19-V-90, JACK REITZ
LOCATION:
1411 CIRCLE DRIVE
DATE:
MARCH 28, 1990
Mr. Reitz appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 22 to request the
following two variations:
1. Section 14.102.8.4 to allow a 400 square foot accessory building (not a garage)
instead of 120 square feet. This accessory building is proposed to be a
workshop.
2. Section 14.102.B.3 to allow a maximum building height of 12' for an accessory
building instead of 10'.
Mr. Reitz has a modest -sized single family home with an attached one -car garage. He is
proposing to construct a workshop structure in his rear yard. This structure meets all
requirements of the Zoning Code except for the size and height. Mr. Reitz explained to
the Zoning Board that he converted his attached garage to a workshop years ago. He now
wishes to construct a separate workshop in the rear yard due to his wife's allergies to
sawdust and varnish odors. He further testified that he has a hobby of furniture making
and does not intend to run a business out of this structure.
Staffs main concern with this proposal is its intended use. It can only be used for a hobby
and not a place of business in a residential district. The location of this workshop will be
located in a similar area of the rear yard as garages on the adjoining properties, and will
be the same height as those garages. Therefore, staff foresees no more of an impact on the
neighborhood than if a garage were allowed. Some of the Board members discussed the
possibility of eliminating the existing garage and building a new two -car garage in the rear
yard. This idea is not possible for two reasons:
1. There is not enough room between the side of the house and the property line
to put in a driveway leading to a new garage; and
John Fulton Dixon - Pag. 2
March 28, 1990
2. Having the workshop in a separate structure is important when considering Mrs.
Reitz' allergies. Mr. Reitz further explained that building a separate structure was
cheaper than any addition to the house.
The Board then voted unanimously 5-0 to grant variations provided that no business will
be conducted from the premises and that the structure be used strictly as a place for an
avocation and not a vocation. There were no neighbors in attendance to voice their
concerns to this case.
PB:hg
Approved:
David A Clements, Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 19-V-90 Hearing Date: March 22, 1990
PETITIONER: Jack and Wilma Reitz
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1411 Circle
PUBLICATION DATE: March 6, 1990
REQUEST: Variations from: Section 14.102.13.4 to allow
a 400 square foot accessory structure instead
of 120 square feet; Section 14.102.13.3 to allow
a maximum building height of 12' for an
accessory structure instead of 10'.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
Chairman Gil Basnik introduced this case as being a request to allow a 400 square foot
accessory structure instead of 120 square feet and a maximum building height of 12' for
an accessory structure instead of 10'.
Mr. Jack Reitz, petitioner, presented his case stating that he and his family were the
original owners and lived at 141*1 Circle Drive for approximately 25 years. Their home is
a raised ranch with a garage underneath. He further testified that several years ago he
converted his garage to a workshop instead of using it to store his vehicle. He now wishes
to construct a 400 square foot, accessory building in his rear yard, to use as a workshop.
He proposes to build it 12 feet in height. His wife's allergy to sawdust and varnish odors
in the past few years, precipitated the reason to move the workshop further from the house.
He further testified that he has a hobby of furniture making and his present workshop is
now over -crowded and he would now like to store his vehicle in a garage. He therefore is
requesting to be permitted to build a W X 20' accessory building in the rear yard with a
6 foot double passage door so he could move furniture in and out.
ZBA-19-V-90
March 22, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Paul Bednar, Planner representing the Village, reiterated that this is a ranch -type home
with an attached one -car garage. He explained the Code requirement that a shed be a
maximum of 120 square feet, and 10 feet in height. Since this structure cannot qualify for
a garage, it must be interpreted as a shed and governed by those regulations. The structure
meets all other Code requirements. He further noted that Code does not allow any
businesses in a residential district, and the petitioner must be aware that, if his request is
granted, he can only use this building for his hobby and not as a place of business.
Mr. Bednar stated that this accessory building is proposed to be placed in a similar area
as the adjoining garages, and the structure will be basically the same height as the garages.
Therefore, the impact will be less than normally expected with a structure of this size. If
the Zoning Board members recommend approval, Mr. Bednar suggested that they prohibit
the installation of any overhead (garage -type) door for this structure.
Mr. Cassidy questioned the logic of permitting such large accessory buildings. Discussion
ensued regarding the possibility of eliminating the existing garage and using this structure
as a garage. However, there would not be enough room for a driveway leading to this
location. The issue of constructing an addition to the home was brought up and discussed.
Mr. Reitz stated that having a separate structure is important considering his wife's
allergies. Further, he felt that building a separate structure was cheaper than adding an
addition to the home.
Mr. Basnik noted that this structure was so far from the concept of a shed and that it would
probably be very difficult to control the usage of this structure if it were sold.
Mrs. Brothers, seconded by Mr. Lannon, moved to grant a variation from Section 14.102.B.4
in Case ZBA-19-V-90, to allow a 400 square foot accessory structure and Section 14.102.B.3
to allow a maximum building height of 12' for an accessory structure as per petitioner's
Exhibit No. 1, provided that no business will be conducted from these premises, and the
structure used strictly as a place for an avocation and not a vocation.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brothers, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary,
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-19-V-90, JACK REITZ
LOCATION: 1411 CIRCLE DRIVE
DATE: MARCH 12, 1990
REQUEST
The applicant is requesting the following two variations:
1. Section 14.102.B.4 to allow a 400 square foot accessory building (not a garage)
instead of 120 square feet. This accessory building is proposed to be a
workshop.
2. Section 14.102.13.3 to allow a maximum building height of 12' for an accessory
building instead of 10'.
VILLAGE STAFF CQMMENTS
The staff's main concern is whether this building will be used to operate a business.
Businesses are not allowed in residential districts. Inspection Services questions whether
sanitary sewer and water is proposed for this building. Building permits will be required
before any building occurs. Engineering Department notes that a grading plan must be
submitted prior to building permits being issued. They also note that the existing driveway
is wider than the 15 foot width allowed by code for a single garage. If this driveway is ever
replaced, the owner should be aware that a variation may be necessary.
r V1
Mr. Reitz resides in a single family neighborhood on the south end of town. There is a
modest -sized home with an attached one -car garage on a standard -sized lot. Mr. Reitz is
proposing a 400 square foot accessory building/workshop, 12' tall, in his rear yard. The
structure meets the required 5 foot setback from the property lines. Variations are required
for both the size and height of this accessory structure. Code allows two detached accessory
structures on a property, (one garage of 600 square feet in size and one accessory structure
120 square feet in size.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-19-V-90
The main question Mr. Reitz should address before the Board is what the intended use is
for this structure. Businesses are not allowed in residential areas. If this is indeed a
workshop for personal hobbies, then Mr. Reitz should address why it cannot be located in
the house, and why it is to be 400 square feet in size.
The neighbors on either side of this property already have detached 400 square foot garages
similar to the structure proposed by Mr. Reitz. For this reason, this structure will not look
out of place considering the neighboring properties. The total impervious lot surface
coverage is approximately 35% when considering this new accessory structure.
In summary, Mr. Reitz must understand that a business is not allowed in a residential area.
If approved as a personal workshop, the structure size and setback from property lines, and
the proposed height will not be out of character for the neighborhood, especially when
considering the neighbors on either side.
Lastly, should the Zoning Board recommend approval of the application, there should be
a condition prohibiting the installation of an overhead door.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-21-V-90, KGS INDUSTRIES
LOCATION: NWC OF HIGHLAND AND RAND ROAD (302 RAND ROAD)
DATE: MARCH 28, 1990
The applicant appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on March 22, 1990. Originally
proposed was a 7,870 square foot one-story strip center which has been amended to allow
a 7;200 square foot building. The following variations are requested.
1. Section 14.2002.A to allow an 18' front yard building setback instead of 30' (along
Highland).
2. Section 14.2002.0 to allow a 10' rear yard building setback instead of 20'.
3. Section 14.2002.E to allow 0' setbacks for parking instead of 20' when adjacent to
residential and 30' when adjacent to a right-of-way (both Highland and Rand).
4. Section 14.3012.13 to waive the 12' X 35' loading zone space requirement.
Two parcels of land are involved in this redevelopment proposal. One is the old Kentucky
Fried Chicken site, the other being the adjacent vacant parcel. The property is zoned
appropriately for commercial development. Adjacent land uses include the townhouse
development to the west, single family to the south and commercial along Rand Road to
the north. It is recognized that this parcel is an irregular shape which in itself creates a
hardship to meet both the parking requirements and all setback requirements. For these
reasons, the variations are requested. It was also indicated that other businesses along
Rand Road currently provide little, if any, setbacks along the frontage. Therefore, in staffs
opinion it is reasonable to allow some flexibility with the setback requirements for this
piece of property. Commercial redevelopment on these parcels can be supported by staff.
It was also noted that greater setbacks could be provided if:
1. the parking ratio were reduced to the Code requirement if 4 spaces per 1000
square feet instead of 4-1/2 per 1000 square feet as shown on the original plan; and
2. the size of the building were reduced.
An optional site plan was submitted to the Board by staff addressing some of our main
concerns including the traffic flow, and increased buffering and landscaping on the site.
Mr. Louis Cassover, representing KGS, presented a revised site plan to the Zoning Board
showing a 7200 square foot building with similar setbacks to the staff generated site plan.
Members of the audience voiced their concerns with this proposal. Most of the neighbor's
comments were opposing the development based on:
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
March 28, 1990
1. the amount of traffic already existing on Rand Road; and
2. the fact that there is a small parking area proposed at the back of this building
to be accessed by Highland Street, possibly by delivery trucks.
Some neighbors opposed the project stating that there was no need for another commercial
development in this area.
The Zoning Board of Appeals discussed the proposed development and the requested
variations at length. It was agreed upon that a commercial redevelopment was permitted
by right in this district, however, some safeguards to the surrounding neighborhood had to
be addressed. The main concern the Zoning Board had with this proposal was the small
parking area located to the rear of the building off Highland Street. Some members of the
Board wanted to see this eliminated by either reducing the size of the building accordingly
and/or putting some additional parking spaces in front. Other members were mainly
concerned that no deliveries would be made to the rear of this building, thereby, lessening
the impact on the neighborhood. It was agreed by most members that the unique
circumstance, that being the irregular shape of the lot, was a hardship and therefore, some
variation to the setback requirements was in order.
The Zoning Board then considered a number of conditions be attached to any site plan
approval including:
1. A revised landscape plan approved by the staff;
2. The dumpster must be enclosed with a fence or a wall and be located so as not
to impact the townhouse neighbors;
3. Face brick be required around the entire building, no roof top mechanicals being
visible;
4. A 6 foot high board on board fence be installed at the rear of the property; and
5. Uses in the center be limited to retail only.
The Zoning Board of Appeals then voted 2-3 denying the requested variations. The
dissenting Board members advised the petitioner that if he were to eliminate the parking
area and possible delivery area to the rear of the store, by adding more spaces in front
and/or reducing the size of the building, that this would alleviate their major concerns.
There was also the opinion that the developer was trying to build too large a structure on
this small, irregular -shape parcel.
Approved:
David M. Clements, Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 21-V-90 Hearing Date: March 22, 1990
PETITIONER: KGS Industries
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 301 E. Rand (Comer of Highland & Rand)
PUBLICATION DATE: March 6, 1990
REQUEST: Variations from: Section 14.2002.A to allow
an 18' front yard building setback instead of 30'
(along Highland); Section 14.2002.0 to allow
a 10' rear yard building setback instead of 20';
Section 14.2002.E to allow 0' setbacks for
parking instead of 20' when adjacent to
residential and 30'when adjacent to a right-of-
way (both Highland and Rand); Section
14.3012.13 to waive the 12' X 35' loading zone
space requirement.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
01-33WO
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: Several
Chairman Basnik introduced ZBA Case 21 as being an application by KGS Industries for
variation of front and side yard requirements along Rand Road and Highland Avenue, and
the rear yard requirement, the request also includes a waiver of the loading space
requirement.
Mr. Paul Bednar, Planner for the Village, was sworn in by Chairman Basnik prior to his
testimony. Mr. Bednar summarized in further detail the request for the Zoning Board of
Appeals. He indicated that this site is the location of the former Kentucky Fried Chicken
building and a vacant lot north of the Kentucky Fried Chicken site. He said the combined
area of these two parcels is approximately 33,000 square feet.
Mr. Bednar stated that the property is zoned a B-3 Commercial District and the
Comprehensive Plan indicates commercial or retail as being desirable at this location.
ZBA-21-V-90
March 22, 1990
Page 2 of 5
He also described the surrounding uses of the subject site and stated that, with
redevelopment of this property, all zoning and Development Code modifications would have
to be met. This would include parkway trees, sidewalks, and storm water detention
requirements.
Mr. Bednar stated that the Planning and Zoning staff supports the redevelopment of this
site, but indicated that, due to the unique nature in size of the property, certain variations
of yard requirements are necessary. Mr. Bednar noted that flexibility is important when
looking at yard requirements on an irregular-shaped parcel, such as this; but that the staff
notes that certain revisions could be made to the plan to help minimize the variations and
perhaps provide a better design. Mr. Bednar indicated that he had distributed a slightly
revised site plan to Zoning Board members that he had discussed with the petitioner, and
that he anticipates the petitioner will address. Mr. Bednar stated that this redesign reduces
the variations on Highland Avenue and Rand Road and slightly reduces the size of the
building.
Mr. Bednar concluded in stating that, should the Zoning Board recommend approval of the
request, he suggests that there be the following conditions:
1. A 6 foot board -on -board fence be installed at the rear of the property.
2. The shopping center be designed with all face brick construction on all four sides
3. There be no roof -type mechanical equipment visible;
4. The parking be designed at a rate of 4 spaces per 1,000 rather than 4-1/2 spaces per
1,0000 and that there be a limitation to only permit retail uses in the center.
Mr. Uuis Cassover then introduced himself to the Zoning Board as the project architect.
Mr. Cassover indicated that the project had been 'revised several times pursuant to
discussions with the Planning and Zoning Department, and that the petition was submitted
with a plan depicting a 7,8W square foot building. The architect presented a revised plan
that showed the building size reduced to 7,200 square feet, which increased setbacks along
Rand Road and Highland. He indicated that this is close to the staff generated design and
that he believes this demonstrates sensitivity to the unique shape of the parcel.
Chairman Basnik asked for the number of stores that would be anticipated in this
development. Mr. Cassover indicated that there could potentially be seven 1,000 square
foot retail stores in the development. Mr. Basnik asked if the property had been pre -leased
and the architect indicated that there are no leases presently for the center. Mr. Cassover
indicated that typical tenants would be retail tenants or service oriented uses, such as,
cleaners or a small paint store or hardware store.
Chairman Basnik then asked for comments from the audience. Mr. Fred Hejduk, 604
Wilshire Drive indicated that he opposes the shopping center plan. He questioned the
ZBA-21-V-90
March 22, 1990
Page 3 of 5
demand for more stores in this area along Rand Road, and indicated that traffic on Rand
Road is at high volumes, and that the intersection of Highland and Rand is dangerous with
heavy congestion.
Mr. Petrucelli noted that the property is currently zoned commercial and asked Mr. Heiduk
what he would anticipate is a better development for this commercial site. Mr. Hejduk did
not indicate a preferred development.
Mr. George Lieder, 401 Highland, indicated that he believed there were too many stores
proposed for this plan and that this would generate too much traffic in the area.
Joe Mathews, 607 North Maple Court, indicated a concern about the design, but stated that
the plan was better than the Kentucky Fried Chicken building. He objected to the number
of variations with the request and stated that the commercial building is too close to the
Maple Court Townhomes.
Mr. Petrucelli questioned how far the townhome building is from the property line and Mr.
Mathews indicated he believed it was approximately 20 feet. Mr. Lannon asked if an 8 foot
fence might solve some concerns of the townhome owners and Mr. Mathews indicated that
an 8 foot fence would help.
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the parking at the rear of the building
adjoining the townhomes and indicated a concern about the dumpster and the loading area
at the rear of the property. Mr. Basnik stated that such a design could only be accessible
by traffic eastbound on Highland Avenue, and that this parking area could generate more
traffic in the adjoining residential neighborhoods than current volumes.
Mr. Bednar indicated that he believed this parking area was designed for "employee only'
parking but that this would be difficult to monitor. Mr. Petrucelli asked if the loading area
could be located elsewhere on the site, and Mr. Bednar responded that it could possibly be
placed in front of the building at the northern edge of the property. Mr. Basnik stated that
he did not like the driveway location on Highland Avenue. Mr. Cassidy pointed out that
the Kentucky Fried Chicken had two curbcuts on Highland for some time.
Mr. Tom Ziegenfuss, a nearby property owner, objected to the driveways on Highland
Avenue because of a concern about increased traffic. He also believed that this driveway
location would increase truck traffic in the neighborhood.
Mr. David Hacker, 600 Windsor Drive, had a concern for any potential 24 hour businesses
in the center. He also pointed out that the intersection of Highland and Rand is very
dangerous.
Michael Wexler, 606 Windsor Drive, noted that access in and out of the proposed site is
difficult and that he thought it would be a difficult turning movement for retail customers
coming to the center. He also pointed out that it is extremely difficult exiting Highland
ZBA-21-V-90
March 22, 1990
Page 4 of 5
Avenue at Rand Road, and that this development might make that condition worse. He
pointed out that the property has an unusual shape and that it is difficult to develop and
he suggested that it not be necessary that every property in the community be redeveloped,
and perhaps, this property could be acquired for a park for the children in the nearby
townhomes.
Janet Hacker, 600 Windsor, stated that she had witnessed many accidents at Highland and
Rand and indicated a preference for a single user building on this site.
Mr. Cassover briefly addressed comments from adjoining property owners and stated that
he did not believe this development would generate significant traffic on Highland, and that
it is oriented to Rand Road.
Larry Gold, one of the partners of KGS Industries, stated that the shopping center had
originally been designed at 9,000 square feet and that through discussions with staff, the size
had been reduced several times. He indicated that they have cooperated as best they could
with staff's attempts to minimise variations, but that the project is very nearly at the
minimal size for any economic return from the development.
The Zoning Board generally discussed the request, and Mr. Basnik indicated a preference
for a single user, rather than the potential of 7 small stores on the site. Mr. Gold stated
that the number of stores in the center would ultimately depend on final leasing, but that
7 would be a maximum and that there could conceivably be less, depending on the square
foot needs for tenants. Mr. Lantion pointed out that this parcel has an irregular shape and
that he saw advantages to redeveloping the former Kentucky Fried Chicken site with the
vacant parcel to the north. He stated that assembling the sites for redevelopment is the
best approach, and that this plan is a reasonable redevelopment for the area. He indicated
that the small shopping renter would not generate any traffic in a residential neighborhood
and that the only reasonable use of the property would be for development with
commercial.
Mr. Petrucefli indicated a concern only for the loading area behind the shopping center off
of Highland Avenue, and stated that he would like to see if there could be some change
made in that location. Mr. Lannon noted that the petitioner had already reduced ,the size
of the shopping center twice and that this helps to minimize the variations necessary with
the site. He also pointed out that there are already refuse trucks in the single family
neighborhoods serving those residents, and that providing service to the shopping center,
would not increase truck traffic in the neighborhood. He also indicated that the four
parking spaces beltind the building would not be a problem for the area. He stated that
the property is zoned commercial, and that combining the sites for a larger scale
redevelopment is the best approach.
Mr. Basnik indicated that perhaps the petitioner was attempting to'overbuild an irregular-
shaped lot, and noted that if the property had a more regular shape, it would be easier to
develop and might not necessitate so many variations.
ZBA-21-V-90
March 22, 1990
Page 5 of 5
The Zoning Board of Appeals generally discussed the alternative site plan submitted by the
petitioner and noted that this helps reduce the variations on Highland Avenue and Rand
Road, but felt the parking and driveway on Highland Avenue behind the shopping center
might have an adverse effect on the neighborhood. Mr. Basnik asked how the Zoning
Board might choose to proceed and it was determined that they would review the
alternative plan submitted by the petitioner which was noted as Exhibit No. 1. This plan
depicted a 22 foot building setback and a 10 foot parking setback on Rand Road, a zero
foot parking setback on the northerly parking bay on Rand Road, and 16 foot parking
setback for the southerly parking bay on Rand Road.
Mr. Basnik asked for a motion on the revised plan and Mr. Lannon moved that the plan
be approved with the conditions noted by the staff as to fencing, all face brick construction,
no roof -type mechanical equipment, and a limitation on retail uses only with no restaurants.
The motion was seconded by Mr. Petrucelli.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Cassidy
NAYS: Petrucelli, Brothers, Basnik
Mr. Petrucelli stated his negative vote was due to a concern about the parking and driveway
on Highland Avenue and felt that, if the shopping center size could be reduced and this
parking be relocated, he would support the plan. Mr. Basnik stated his no vote was because
he believed the petitioner was over -building this irregular shaped site.
Motion denied by a vote of 2-3.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
�" M. C"4v�v
David M. Clements,
Recording Secretary
,.,..-LIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPL,,f
PLQ4NING AM ZONING DEPARThUM
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT- ZBA-21.V.90, KGS INDUSTRIES
LOCATION: NWC OF HIGHLAND AND RAND ROAD (302 RAND ROAD)
DATE: MARCH 16, 119"
REQUE
The applicant is proposing a 7,870 square foot, one-story strip center and requests the
following variations:
1. Section 14.2002A to allow an 18' front yard building setback instead of 30' (along
Highland).
2. Section 14.2002.0 to allow a 10' rear yard building setback instead of 20'.
3. Section 14.2002.E to allow 0' setbacks for parking instead of 201 when adjacent to
residential and 30' when adjacent to a right-of-way (both Highland and Rand).
4. Section 14-3012.11 to waive the IT X 35' loading zone space requirement.
VILLAGE STAFF COMMEM
The following comments were submitted by various departments:
1. It is noted that the traffic on Highland at this location is one-way westbound,
Highland Avenue is a half street
2. The parking lot layout off of Highland is very awkward. Only 3 to 4 staUs are
actually usable. The one-way traffic flow on Highland makes this area virtually
unusable.
3. With no loading space designated on the site, delivery trucks will block the parking
lot aisle in from of -the -building.
4. Any driveway widths should be 24 feet wide for two-way traffic.
5. An I.D.O.T. permit will be required for all work done along Rand Road.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-21-V-90
6. Parking stalls should be a minimum of 9' wide by 16.5' long with a 1.5' overhang.
The plans show a 15' length with a 3' overhang.
7. On-site water detention will probably be required. The Engineering Department will
determine this aper reviewing engineering plans.
6. Full right-of-way improvements will be required on both Rand Road and Highland
Street, including but not limited to sidewalks, street lights and street trees.
7. The plat of subdivision shows a 10' easement between what is now Lot 1 and Lot
2, whereas the applicant's plat of survey does not indicate this. It is unclear whether
any utilities are located in this easement or not. The building will not be allowed
to be built upon an easement. If an easement exists, it will have to be vacated and
any utilities located in it will have to be relocated.
8. Village water is available on the south side of Highland at Elm Street.
9. Sewers are available along Highland.
10. The sanitary sewer stub will go to a 30" line on Highland Avenue. An M.S.D. permit
will be required.
11. Full engineering plans and grading plans are required.
12. The Fire Department notes that this layout causes difficult apparatus maneuvering.
14. Development guarantees and fees are required. Both the Development Code and
Building Code must be followed.
PLANNING ZONING COMMNTS
The petitioner is proposing a small strip center redevelopment on two parcels of land, one
which was an old Kentucky Fried Chicken site, the other being an adjacent vacant parcel.
The entire property is zoned B-3 which allows for commercial development. Adjacent uses
include a multi -family townhouse development to the west, single family to the south and
east, and other commercial users north on Rand Road. The Comprehensive Plan identifies
this parcel as being best suited for general commercial/office. These two parcels combined
form an irregular-shaped lot. As a result of the proposed redevelopment, all zoning and
Development Code regulations must be met or variations must be granted.
The previous Kentucky Fried Chicken development did not meet the setbacks along Rand
or Highland that would bexequired today. Other commercial properties along Rand Road
do not meet today's requirements of setback along Rand Road The office building directly
north of this proposal is well short of required parking and, in fact, has used the vacant
parcel for parking at times.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
ZBA-21-V-90
It should first be noted that. Planning and Zoning supports a redevelopment on these
parcels. However, when reviewing this particular site plan, we have some concerns. We
understand that the irregular-shaped property creates a hardship in itself to be able to meet
both parking requirements and all setback requirements. Also considering the fact that
other businesses along Rand Road currently provide little, if any, setbacks along the
frontage, it is reasonable to allow some flexibility. Even so, it appears as though greater
4 setbacks could be provided if:
1. The parking ratio reduced to the Code requirement for retail uses of 4 spaces
per 1000 square feet instead 4 1/2 spaces per 1000 square feet, as shown.
2. The size of the building were reduced.
We are in the process of designing optional site plans that we will present to the Board for
your review at the hearing. It is our opinion that these staff generated alternatives will
address our main concerns including traffic flow, increased buffering and landscaping on the
site. We cannot support the site plan submitted without some refining to correct thew
issues.
In addition to these main concerns, we would recommend- a number of conditions be
attached to any revised site plan approval including:
1. The landscape plan must be revised and approved by staff.
2. The dumpster as shown is located very close to the townhouse development. it
should be relocated and enclosed with a fence or wall.
3. Face brick should be required around the entire building because of the close
proximity to residential at the rear. No roof -top mechanicals should be visible.
4. A 6 foot high board -on -board fence should be installed by the developer along the
,rear of the property.
5. The uses in this center should be limited to retail only.
In summary, we can support a commercial redevelopment on this property if the site plan
is revised to alleviate our concerns. One of the standards for a variation states that a
hardship has been caused by unique circumstances, such as, an irregular-shaped lot. This
particular lot being odd -shaped makes it difficult to meet all the setback requirements and
therefore, some flexibility in these regulations is reasonable. By decreasing the building
size and reducing the provided parking ratio to 4 spaces per 1000, we believe the plan will
be more acceptable.
PB:bg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: 'JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-22-V-90, P.N.B. FINANCIAL CORPORATION
LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF ELMHURST RD. AND MIDWAY DR.
DATE: MARCH 28, 1990
Park National Bank is proposing to build a new banking facility on this vacant 3.4 acre site.
Representatives from Park National Bank presented their case before the Zoning Board
of Appeals on March 22. They are requesting the following variations:
1. Section 14.2002 to allow a parking lot and driveway aisle setback of 0' instead
of 30' as required along Midway Drive (a 6' setback is provided for most of
the parking lot).
2. Section 14.2004 to allow a maximum building height of 35'6", not including
the light well, whereas 30' is the maximum allowed by code.
Mr. Don Anderson of Park National Bank gave Board members some of the bank's
background in this area. He further stated that they are proposing to build a new facility
upon this property and are requesting two variations in order to do so. Presently, the parcel
is a vacant 3.4 acre site zoned B-3 allowing for such a use. Their neighbors are the Auto
Care Mall, Charlie Club, and Zanies Comedy Club. Currently, there is a temporary
banking facility on this property that will be removed when the permanent building is
completed.
The first variation discussed reflects the parking lot setback along Midway Drive as
evidenced on the submitted site plans. Mr. John Clarke, the architect for this facility,
explained the difficulties in meeting the 30 foot setback along Midway Drive. He also
submitted an alternative site plan which by revising the parking layout from 90 degrees to
angle parking, he is able to provide at least a 10 foot setback along the Midway Drive
property line. This revised plan addresses comments made in the staff memo. It was also
mentioned that Park National Bank has provided very generous setbacks at the front and
rear of the property, resulting in in much more open space provided, than the surrounding
commercial users.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
March 28, 1990
The second variation regarding the building height at the entrance was explained to the
Board by Mr. Clarke. Only at the octagonal -shaped entrance lobby will the height of the
building be 35 1/2 feet. The bulk of the building will meet the 30 foot maximum height.
The Board members discussed the issues and generally agreed that the building height
variation was insignificant and the setback variation would be acceptable with either the
original or the alternate site plan. The Board then voted unanimously 5-0 to approve both
variations, subject to Park National Bank representatives discussing the alternative site
plan with staff. There were no objectors present at this hearing regarding this case.
Subsequent to this Zoning Board hearing, the Park National Bank's representatives have
indicated their willingness to submit the alternate site plan showing a minimum 10 foot
setback along Midway Drive.
PB:hg
Approved:
David M. Clements, DirectoF
'Mat Ila,' "je, I I Mal,
iow
'i ,r•a , As iii' ;I♦■ i, iii
! i®1 s
TAST itTYATIO«
NEW BANKING FACILITY co.s«.a..z........«,.
KYIFIf lAIW� W16 iOG >Nf
CRfh # SIQT fAG k COIRtMt m// iYlSf 4 # 4fatA
Y l Ah ft- / A/ f
aY,rar rawj ama.r erre �-" s` -/
'` ° i
>3 Wa
81 -PASS LANE _ a!
T -f
F WIIM tlA�LMt NI j 1 f ,
�. -WN8 KKK
- fi4S(6 ® lfti
�fB GKh`
I {
C t b !Ns1'u `,TTM f
T MMAY P untr n2v eusrh K f h OfiVE — — m
E
15
a w eo bo rKtr l
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 22-V-90
Hearing Date: March 22, 1990
PETITIONER:
P.N.B. Financial Corporation
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
2100 South Elmhurst Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
March 6, 1990
REQUEST:
Variations from: Section 14.2002 to allow a
parking lot and driveway aisle setback of 0'
instead of 30' as required along Midway Drive
(a 6' setback is provided for most of the parking
lot); Section 14.2004 to allow a maximum
building height of 35'6", not including the light
well, whereas 30' is the maximum allowed by
code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Lois Brothers
Ronald Cassidy
Peter Lannon
Len Petrucelli
ABSENT:
Robert Brettrager
Marilyn O'May
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
None
Chairman Basnik introduced the variation request filed by Park National Bank and
indicated that the petition was filed for variations of the front yard requirement on Midway
Drive and the building height.
Mr. Don Anderson introduced himself as a representative of Park National Bank from 2958
North Milwaukee Avenue in Chicago, Illinois. Mr. Anderson indicated that Park National
Bank is celebrating their 40th Anniversary in Chicago and that this would be their first
suburban location. Mr. Anderson stated that the bank currently operates a temporary
facility at this location and that this would be removed upon completion of the new
structure. He stated that the proposed bank building is of a good design and sensitive to
the -character okurreundutgprepertie&-He4ndicated that -the bank is set back substantially
from Elmhurst Road with a landscape retention pond in front providing an attractive
entryway.
With a mounted site plan, Mr. Anderson then described the parking on site, traffic
circulation, and a landscape plan. He indicated that the request was filed because the 30
foot parking lot setback on Midway Drive could not be met. He demonstrated that this was
ZBA-9-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 2 of 3
a function of the width of the lot and indicated that as much setback as possible is being
provided. Concerning the height variation, he stated that the only location the building
height exceeds the ordinancerequirement is at the main entrance, and this is because of
the decorative atrium type feature at the main door. Mr. Anderson stated that, in his
opinion, this bank is compatible with the area and would enhance surrounding uses and, in
all likelihood, would become an attractive addition for this part of Mount Prospect.,
Mr. Paul Bednar then summarized the staff report for the Zoning Board and indicating that
the property is zoned commercial and that this development meets the Comprehensive Plan.
He described surroundeduses and made reference to the 30 foot setback requirement on
Midway Drive. He stated that the proposed setback is 6 feet for most of the length at
Midway Drive and reduced at the cul-de-sac bulb. Mr. Bednar stated that the setback could
be increased by shifting the entire parking lot north and eliminating proposed parking
spaces on the east/west driveway. Mr. Bednar pointed out that other uses in this vicinity
do not meet our current setback requirements, but that Park National Bank is providing
setbacks and landscaping far in excess of surrounding uses. He indicated that this is a good
design.
Mr. Bednar stated that the staff has no objections to the minor height variation at the main
entrance and that this request is similar to the height variation granted to the nearby
Dempster Development Center.
Mr. Basnik questioned the necessity of the cul-de-sac at the west end of Midway Drive and
asked if this could be eliminated to possibly open up the setback at that point. Mr. Lannon
stated that, perhaps this could be vacated and that it does not seem to have any real
purpose. Mr. Lannon and Mr. Basnik indicated that this was a good plan and an excellent
building design, and that they appreciated having such a good; product to review at the
public hearing.
Architect John Clarke, 716 N. Wells, Chicago, Illinois,, briefly stated that a revised plan had
been prepared that depicted angle parking in the parking lot and that this works to increase
the landscape setback and reduce the variations. He stated that the bank believes that this
angle parking works well, and that this re -design -helps meet some of the concerns of the
staff. He stated that he believes the bank is an attractive design, and the good design and
the
landscape ` retention pond on Elmhurst Road will be a quality development at this
locat.
The
believe the original sit
a revised plan submitted
Accordingly, Chairman
that the variations for
approved. The motio
discussed
for
n
by the project architect in an effort to increase the setbacks.
Basnik asked for a motion on the request. Mr. Petrucelli moved
setback requirements on Midway Drive and the building height be
was seconded by Mr. Lannon.
ZBA-9-V-90
January 25, 1990
Page 3 of 3
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Cassidy, Brothers, Basnik
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Mr. Lannon indicated that he would ask the staff and Village Board to consider vacating
the north half of the cul-de-sac to further increasing landscaping at this location.
David M. Clements,
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEA CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER =
SUBJECT: ZBA-22-V.90, P.N.B. FINANCIAL CORPORATION
LOCATION: NORTHWEST CORNER OF ELMHURST RD. AND MIDWAY DR.
DATE: MARCH 14, 1990
Park National Bank is requesting the following variations in order to construct a new
banking facility on this property.
1. Section 14.2002 to allow a parking lot and driveway aisle setback of 0' instead
of 30' as required along Midway Drive (a 6' setback is provided for most of
the parking lot).
2. Section 14.2004 to allow a maximum building height of 35'6", not including
the light well, whereas 30' is the maximum allowed by code.
wjlff�� �*.r
The following comments were submitted by staff:
1. The Police Department suggests that the Bank contact the Crime Prevention
Department regarding security concerns.
2. Both Engineering and Inspection Services Department recommend that access
off of Midway Drive be limited to two locations only. Another option is to make the
east drive an entrance only and the furthest west drive an exit only. Curbs at the
west drive shall be depressed for handicapped access.
3. -Both Engineering and Fire Departineurnote that the driye-through� by-pass lane
along the north property line is on the Village easement. The Fire Department
suggests that the width of this by-pass lane be 12 feet. If the by-pass lane is located
on the easement as shown, any damage done to the parking lot as a result of utility
work, will not be the Village's responsibility. There is an existing 24" sanitary sewer
in this easement.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-22-V-90
4. There is an existing Village storm sewer on Midway Drive. An I.D.O.T. storm
sewer is located on Elmhurst Road. An I.D.O.T. permit will be required for
connection.
5. The existing sanitary service to the trailer is in the same location as the proposed
detention basin. Engineering Department wants the representatives to explain what
will be done with this service after the permanent structure is built. M.S.D. permits
will be required.
6. Detention will be required. The total site shall drain to the detention basin.
The Engineering Department questions how the detention will be installed prior to
the Certificate of Occupancy for this building if the temporary trailer is located in
the location of the basin.
7. There is an 8" watermain on Midway Drive. The existing water service will be
shut off at the main.
8. A sidewalk is not required west of the bulb on the Midway cul-de-sac. If a walk
is desired, it should be placed on Park National Bank property.
9. Driveways shall have a 2" galvanized conduit buried 24" below grade for a street
light cable.
10. Any grade changes for berms must be shown on the engineering plans.
11. All Development Code and Building Code requirements shall apply. Full
engineering drawings are required.
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS
Park National Bank Corporation wants to build a banking facility on this vacant 3.4 acre
parcel. This property is zoned B-3 which allows for the proposed use. The surrounding
uses include the Auto Care Mall to the north, Charlie Health Club to the west, and Zanies
Comedy Club to the south. All the surrounding parcels are also zoned commercial. The
Comprehensive Plan identifies this parcel, as well as all the surrounding parcels, as being
bes: suited for general commercial/office. Park National Bank is currently operating a
temporary banking facility on this property. This trailer will be removed within the year
as the permanent building is completed. Two variations to the Zoning Code requirements
are requested as part of this proposal.
-The first -variation tote discussed reflects the -parking tot setback along Midway Drive. The
proposed site plan shows an east/west parking lot aisle 6 feet from the Midway Drive right-
of-way line. The parking lot setback is as close as zero feet at the western -most driveway.
As evidenced by the site plan, the bulk of the parking lot is set back 22 feet from Midway
Drive.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
ZBA-22-V-90
The cul-de-sac bulb on Midway Drive does create somewhat of a hardship for providing a
required 30 foot setback along the entire stretch. The fact that the bulb projects
approximately 22 feet north towards the bank property, makes it difficult to design a
parking lot without wasting some space.
An alternative exists, whereas, the same size parking lot can be provided along with an
increased buffer along Midway Drive. The entire parking lot could be shifted further north
another 9 feet, if the drive -up exit lane was reduced in width from 24 feet to 15 feet. In
our opinion, this would be a feasible option. This option would provide a minimum 9'
setback at the cul-de-sac bulb.
The site plan also shows a 6 foot separation between the south property line and the
east/west aisle on the bank property. This separation could be increased if the 10 parking
spaces shown along this stretch were eliminated, and the east/west drive was shifted north
towards the building. These 10 spaces could be incorporated into the west end of the main
parking lot where there is ample room. It should be noted that it is important to have an
east/west drive, as shown on the plan, for fire safety reasons and good traffic flow.
The surrounding properties were developed under a different set of regulations years ago,
and therefore, have not provided 30 foot setbacks along any of the rights-of-way. Park
National Bank, now developing the parcel under the new set of rules, would be the only
development in this area having to abide by these setbacks. The bank has provided
generous setbacks in both the front and the rear yards.
The second variation addresses the building height at the entrance. This octagonal -shaped
entrance tower is shown at a 35.5 foot height. The remainder of the building meets the
30 foot maximum height. Since this entrance tower makes up only a small part of the
actual building, we have no problem with allowing the extra height.
Finally, there is a small sign parcel shown on the survey, on which the Charlie Club sign
is located. This issue may have to be reviewed by the Sign Review Board before a new
bank sign could be permitted along Elmhurst Road. Additional information regarding the
legality of this sign parcel has been requested of the applicant.
In summary, the applicants must address the feasibility of the options offered in this memo
regarding the setback along Midway Drive. As noted above, Park National Bank will be
providing much more in the way of setbacks along the -perimeter of their site than any of
the surrounding properties. The building height variation for the entrance poses no
problem to us and should not have an impact upon the area. Finally, the petitioner should
make himself aware of all Village staff comments listed in this memo.
11-M-1
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: March 20, 1990
SUBJ: Ordinance Amendments
Yard Materials
At the March 15th meeting of the Mount Prospect Recycling Commis-
sion the Commissioners reviewed and approved the attached draft
copies of the amendments to the Village's refuse ordinances.
The main thrust of the ordinance amendments is the language
addressing the separation, collection and composting of yard
materials within the Village limits. These amendments are con-
sistent with the guidelines established by the Recycling Commis-
sion, approved by the Village Board, and as stated in the recent-
ly mailed brochures to our residents. Below is a summary of the
proposed ordinance amendments.
1. Chapter 11, Article XXIII "Secondhand Dealers and Scaven-
gers"
Amendments to this ordinance include insertion of the term
yard materials collection and recycling collection, as well
as a definition of yard materials and the change in how
brush should be bundled in 5' lengths by 2' in diameter as
opposed to the original 4' lengths.
All other regulations within Article XXIII have not changed.
2. Chapter 19, Article II "Garbage, Refuse, Recycling and Yard
Materials"
Again in this ordinance amendments include the insertion of
the term yard materials and recycling where applicable.
Under the section on receptacles we have incorporated lan-
guage requiring only the use of the Village's imprinted
biodegradable compost paper bags for yard materials. We
have also added the description of the recycling blue bin
which was not added to this ordinance when we started our
Village -wide recycling program.
Language has also been added requiring the property owners
to be responsible for the separation of yard materials from
their normal garbage and the warning procedures followed,
should the property owners not separate their materials
properly.
3. Chapter XXIII, Section 23,402 "Dumping in Weller Creek and
Other Places"
The only addition to this ordinance again is the insertion
of the word yard materials into the existing ordinance.
It is the recommendation of the Recycling Commission that these
ordinances be presented to the Village Board at their April 3rd
Village Board meeting for their rev�ew and ado tion.
zGlenR. An ler
GRA/eh
cc: Recycling Commission
Herbert L. Weeks
Lisa Angell
Chuck Bencic
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 11.2301 entitled "License Required"
Paragraph A. of Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Pros-
pect, as amended, is hereby further amended to delete Sections
11.2301 (A) in its entirety; so that hereinafter said Sections
11.2301 (A) shall be and read as follows:
ARTICLE XXIII
SECONDHAND DEALERS AND SCAVENGERS
Sec. 11.2301. License Required. No person shall engage in
the business of scavenger, garbage collector,
yard material collector, recycling collector,
secondhand dealer or junk dealer within the
corporate limits of the Village, except in
compliance with the provisions of this Article.
A. Exclusive Franchise License; Residential Dwellings and
Dwelling Units: There shall be issued in the Village no
more than one scavenger license, authorizing the collection
of garbage, refuse and yard materials for any and all resi-
dential dwelling units located within the corporate limits
of the Village.
1. The said exclusive franchise license shall be issued to
that contractor awarded the "Exclusive Residential Refuse
Disposal Service Contract" by the most current resolution
passed by the President and Board of Trustees of the Vil-
lage.
2. In addition to whatever contractual obligations to the
Village such exclusive franchise may have, the said exclu-
sive franchise licensee shall have the following duties and
obligations:
a. The exclusive franchise licensee shall furnish all
labor, materials and equipment for the removal of trash and
refuse, recyclables and recyling container and yard materi-
als in regular weekly collections, which collections shall
include the following materials:
1. All kitchen wastes including cans, bottles,
household food, accumulations of animal food
and vegetable matter attendant in the prepara-
tion, use, cooking and service of foods.
2. General household trash and refuse, including
ashes, empty cartons, crates, boxes, wrapping
materials, cloth materials, empty cans, discard-
ed toys, discarded clothing and similar materials
and magazines, when securely and neatly
bound in convenient sized bundles.
3. Discarded furniture, fixtures, household
appliances, swing sets, and other large
bulky items.(see paragraph c)
4. Yard materials, including bagged leaves,
grass clippings, weeds, Christmas trees,
small amounts of sod, bushes, brush
clippings, tree limbs and branch
clippings, when securely bound in bundles not
exceeding five (5) feet in length and two (2)
feet in diameter. Each bundle shall not exceed
forty-five (45) pounds in weight and shall be
k
capable of being handled and loaded by one (1)
person.
5. Small amounts of rocks and building materials
resulting from do-it-yourself projects, shall
be collected if placed in containers which meet
the requirements of this municipal code.
6. Materials to be collected will not include
earth, garbage, refuse and waste, sod, rocks,
concrete, or refuse from remodeling or
construction of homes.
Materials from containers spilled by the waste
collector must be removed by said collector.
b. Waste containers provided on the street for pub
lic use as well as those provided at all Municipally -owned build-
ings shall be serviced at no charge to the Village.
C. The licensee will furnish a bulk pick-up service
as a part of its regular pick-up service to collect and
dispose of all discarded materials and trash which are too
large and bulky to handle by packer -type equipment. This
bulk pick-up service will include bulky items such as re
frigerators, stoves, washing machines, dryers, freezers,
hot water heaters, pianos, beds, box springs and mattress
es, sofas, overstuffed furniture, swing sets, large carpets
and other discarded household furniture, furnishings,
fixtures and appliances. These items shall be placed at the
curb by the resident no sooner than four o'clock (4:00)
P.M. the day before the day designated for collection,
but prior to 7:00 A.M. the day of collection.
d. The licensee shall maintain an office and toll
free telephone, for the receipt of service calls or com
plaints, and shall be available for such calls on all work-
ing days from eight o'clock (8:00)A.M. to four thirty
o'clock (4:30) P.M. Any complaints must be given prompt
and courteous attention, and in case of missed scheduled
collection, the licensee shall investigate; and if
verified, shall arrange for pick-up of -said refuse within
twenty four (24) hours after the complaint is received.
3. Upon award of the contract for residential gar-
bage/refuse, and yard material collection by resolution
aforesaid, the Village Clerk shall issue the said exclusive
franchise license upon payment of the proper fee therefor
as set forth hereinbelow.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1• -4r OUX140OZ101
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 19
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, the Village has employed a Contractor for the collec-
tion and disposal of refuse for all residential and
multifamily units within the Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the State of Illinois has passed Illinois Solid Waste
Planning and Recycling Act 85-1430 that bans the dumping of yard
materials (leaves, grass, branches, etc.) into a landfill; and
WHEREAS, the Village wishes the Contractor to provide a separate
collection of yard materials; and
WHEREAS, the Contractor will dispose of these yard materials at
an approved composting facility; and
WHEREAS, the Residents of Mount Prospect will be required to
separate their yard materials from all other refuse and recycla-
ble materials.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the following sections of Article II enti-
tled "Garbage and Refuse" of Chapter 19 of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect be deleted and the same are hereby amended in
their entirety, The Index; Section 19.201 (A & B); Section
19.202; and Section 19.203. Also the following new sections are
hereby added as new additions; Section 19.203 (C); Section
19.205 (A;3) and Section 19.208; so that hereinafter said Arti-
cle II shall be and read as follows:
ARTICLE 11
GARBAGE, REFUSE, RECYCLABLES AND YARD MATERIALS
SECTION:
19.201. Receptacles
19.202. Commercial and Industrial Establishments
19.203. Residential Service Required
19.204. Accumulation and Sorting of Garbage and/or Yard
Materials
19.205. Enforcement
19.206. Penalty
19.207. Severability
19.208. Fees
Sec. 19.201. Receptacles.
A. It shall be the duty of every owner, agent, tenant or
occupant of any house, building, flat, apartment, apartment
building or other place where people reside, board, lodge
or prepare or serve animal or vegetable matter, to place
all garbage, refuse or waste, recyclables and yard materi-
als in approved receptacles as set forth and defined
hereinbelow and to maintain same in good order and in accor-
dance with the law. These receptacles shall include the
following;
1. An approved receptacle for the purpose of storage of
garbage, refuse or waste, rocks and building materials
resulting from do-it-yourself projects and all other items
of similar nature which do not exceed the size of the ap-
proved receptacle. Said receptacle shall be a container
of standard waterproof construction with handles and a
tight fitting cover or lid and shall be no larger than
thirty (30) gallons in capacity. There is no limit as to
the number of such containers used by any family unit.
2. Village -imprinted, biodegradable (30 gal.) compost paper
bags are the only approved receptacles for disposal of
yard materials. Yard materials are defined as small
amounts of sod, grass clippings, garden materials, small
brush, leaves, twigs, weeds, and all other items of similar
nature. Items placed in these compost bags shall not ex-
ceed the size of the approved receptacles.
3. A Village -imprinted and furnished 14.5 -gallon blue bin
is the approved receptacle for the collection of
recyclables. Excess materials that do not fit in the bin
may be put in paper bags and placed either on top of or
alongside of the blue bin.
4. A receptacle furnished by a Village -approved scavenger
for commercial or industrial establishments including
multifamily dwelling units when curb service for each fami-
ly is not in effect.
B. No containers are necessary for such items as large and
bulky as appliances (refrigerators, washing machines,
stoves, dryers, etc.), large toys, furniture, empty car-
tons, empty crates, magazines when securely tied in bundles
convenient to handle, brush and branches when securely tied
in bundles and not exceeding five feet (51) in length,
twenty-four inches (2411) in diameter and forty-five pounds
(45 lbs.) in weight, Christmas trees and other such large
discarded household objects.
Sec. 19.202. Commercial and Industrial Establishments. All
commercial or industrial establishments are re-
quired to make private arrangements for the collection and dis-
posal of all garbage, refuse or waste, and yard materials in a
prompt and sanitary manner, which includes the use of approved
receptacles or other containers meeting the specifications for
same as set forth in Section 19.201 hereinabove.
Sec. 19.203. Residential Service Required.
Every owner, agent, tenant or occupant of any
single family residential home or residential dwelling unit
located within the corporate limits of the Village shall have
accumulations of garbage and refuse collected and disposed
of at least once each seven (7) days unless interrupted by a
legal holiday.
A. Such collection shall be made by the scavenger company
servicing the Village under the current exclusive franchise
license issued by the Village for residential dwellings and
residential dwelling units.
B. The occupancy of any premises for residential purposes
shall be prima facie evidence that refuse is being produced
and accumulated on such premises.
Section 19.204 (C). Sorting. Pursuant to Illinois Solid
Waste Planning and Recycling Act 85-1430
(Amendment to the Environmental Protection Act of 1970), it is
against the law to dump yard materials (leaves, grass, branches,
etc.) into a landfill.
1. It shall be unlawful for any person to mix any yard
materials with garbage and/or debris.
2. Yard materials are to be placed in the approved recepta-
cle, as described in Section 19.201 A.(2).
Sec. 19.205. A (3) Warning. If yard materials are not
separated as required by Section 19.204(c),
the materials will be tagged as unacceptable and refused for
pickup. The offending person shall then remove said mixed gar-
bage and yard materials, separate them into the proper recepta-
cles, and place them for pickup on the next scheduled pickup
date.
Sec. 19.208. Fees. The following fees are set forth for the
pickup and disposal of garbage, refuse and yard
materials:
A. Residential. The Village shall provide once -a -week ser-
vice, as set forth in the current exclusive franchise li-
cense/contract for the disposal of garbage, refuse, and
recyclables only.
B. Users of the Village -imprinted, biodegradable compost paper
bag will pay a per -bag fee at the time of purchase. The
fee of the bag will be determined by the Village Manager
and shall relate directly to the cost of the bag, its dis-
tribution, collection and disposal.
C. All commercial and industrial establishments will contract
directly with their respective scavengers for collection
and disposal of all garbage, refuse or waste and yard ma-
terials.
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYES:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 23
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 23.402 entitled "Dumping in Weller
Creek and Other Places" of Chapter 23 of the Village Code of
Mount Prospect, as amended, is hereby further amended to delete
paragraph A and to insert in lieu thereof an entirely new para-
graph A; so that hereinafter said Section 23.402.A shall be and
read as follows:
A. "It shall be unlawful for any person, either by him-
self or by an agent, employee or a servant to cast,
throw, sweep, sift or deposit in any manner any kind of dirt,
yard material, rubbish, waste article, thing or substance, wheth-
er liquid or solid in or upon any public way or public place in
the Village, or in or upon the waters and/or channel area of
Weller Creek or any canal, drain, sewer or receiving basin with-
in the jurisdiction of said Village. Neither shall any person
cast, throw, sweep, sift or deposit any of the aforementioned
items anywhere within the jurisdiction of the Village in such
manner that it may be carried or deposited in whole or in part
by the action of the sun, wind, rain or snow, in any of the
aforementioned places."
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this - day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VIII OF CHAPTER 8
OF THE VILLA GE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
_-
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 8.802 entitled "Imposition of Tax" of
Chapter 8 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amended by increasing the real estate transfer tax
imposed from one dollar ($1.00) for every one thousand dollars
value to three dollars ($3.00) for any transaction dated May 1,
1990 or later; so that hereinafter said Section 8.108 of Chapter
8 shall be and read as follows:
Sec. 8.802. Imposition of Tax. A tax imposed on the
transfer of title to real property located in the Village as
evidenced by the recordation of a deed by any person or by the
delivery of any deed or assignment of interest of said real
property, made as of the first day of May, 1990, and thereafter,
whether vesting the owner with the beneficial interest in or legal
title to said property or merely the possession or use thereof for
any purpose or to secure future payment of money or the future
transfer of any such real property.
The tax imposed for any transaction entered into between November
17, 1987 and April 30, 1990 shall be one dollar ($1.00) for every
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00) value or fraction thereof as
stated in the declaration. The tax imposed for any transaction
entered into between November 17, 1987 and April 30, 1990 shall be
one dollar ($1.00) for every one dollars ($3.00) for every one
thousand dollars ($1,000.00) value or fraction thereof as stated
in the declaration.
The term "deed" as used in this Article shall mean all documents
transferring or reflecting the transfer of legal title, equitable
title, or both legal and equitable title to real property, or the
beneficial interest in a land trust. Delivery of any deed shall
be deemed to have occurred when the transferee or purchase, or his
representative or agent, receives possession of the deed or in the
case of a land trust when the trustee receives possession of a
valid assignment of a beneficial interest. 11
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
O
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ARTICLE VIII OF CHAPTER 11
OF THE VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That Section 11.3410 entitled "Other Fees" of
Chapter 11 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, is
hereby further amend Section 11.3410.D.2 by increasing the license
fee for tobacco vending machines from $50.00 per machine annually
to one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per machine annually; so
that hereinafter said Section 11.3410.D.2 of Chapter 11 shall
include the following:
Sec. 11.3410.D
2. Tobacco vending machines $150.00 per machine annually
SECTION TWO: That this ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
9-11
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM 7MCMUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: March 28, 1990
SUBJECT: Turf Mowing Bid
On March 21, 1990, sealed bids were opened for a proposed turf
mowing contract. Eight lawn maintenance firms responded to our
bid requests, and a tabulation of the results is attached.
Expenditure of $25,000 is requested for this contract, per page
150, account code 1071036115 of the budget.
I recommend that we accept the low bid as submitted by Ingram
Enterprises in an amount not to exceed $18,200. Our Forestry
Division has checked on all their references and found them to
be satisfactory. If Ingram is awarded the contract, I request
that they be allowed to start work on or about April 9, 1990,
even though the budget has not yet been fully adopted.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
Turf Mowing Contract Bid Opening
Ingram
Hoff
Excel
Resirepo
E -Z
Gambino
North Shore
Martam
Enterprises
Corporation
Maintenance
Brothers
Landscaping
Landscaping
Greenscapes
Construction
8u55e/Wnle Improvement
$ 416.00
$ 260.00
$ 598.00
$ 468.00
$ 780.00
$ 520.00
$ 650.00
S 1,274.00
Senior Center
156.00
208.00
260.00
260.00
650.00
260.00
520.00
1,170.00
Public Safety
338.00
260.00
468.00
468.00
650.00
338.00
650.00
1,222.00
Train Station
338.00
260.00
468.00
520.00
1,170.00
650.00
780,00
1,430.00
Maple Street Lot
728.00
364.00
832.00
624.00
1,170.00 "
910.00
780.00
1,560.00
Kiehm's Island
234.00
260.00
364.00
416.00
520.00
300.00
520.00
1,040.00
Prospect Ave. Ch. isles
442.00
260.00
598,00
520.00
780.00
520.00
780.00
1,430,00
Evergreen Ave. Ch. Isles
442.00
260.00
598.00
585.00
780.00
572.00
520.00
1,560.00
SCurve by St. Raymond's
494.00
520.00
650.00
780.00
910.00
1,040.00
780.00
1,742.00
Elmhurst Ave. Ctr. Isles
468.00
468.00
676.00
676.00
780.00
520.00
650.00
1,638.00
Weiler Creek Improvement
338.00
312.00
442.00
572.00
650.00
572.00
650.00
1,560.00
Neighborhood Park
754.00
520.00
1,092.00
780.00
910.00
1.040.00
1,560.00
1.586.00
Centennial Park
1,508.00
2,002.00
2,100.00
2,470,00
1,950.00
2,000.00 '
2.080.00
6,500.00
RR ROW on Prospect
11066.00
988.00
1,326.00
858.00
1,040.00
1,040.00
2,600.00
2,470.00
(Mein to Central)
RR ROW on N.W. Highway
1,144.00
1,482.00
1,456.00
1,560.00
1,950.00
1,560.00
2,600.00
3,900.00
(Main to Central)
Rn ROW on Prospect
1,508.00
21000.00
1,846.00
2,210.00
2,080.00
1,820.00
3,120.00
6,110.00
(Main to Mt. Prosepct Rd.)
RR ROW on N.W. Highway
2,050.00
3,900.00
2,652.00
4,160.00
4,160.00
3,900.00
4,550.00
14,300.00
(Elm SL to Mt. Prosepct Rd.)
RR ROW on N.W. Highway
2,184.00
4,160.00
2,938.00
4,680.00
4,420.00
4,030.00
5,200.00
15,990.00
(Waterman to Central)
-
Mt. Prospect Rd./Central
416.00
1,040.00
624.00
1.170.00
780.00
2,054.00
780.00
3,250.00
Well ♦4, 199 N. Waverly
208.00
520.00
338.00
520.00
650.00
650.00
520.00
1,170.00
Water Tower
182.00
260.00
312.00
260.00
520.00
312.00
780.00
988.00
Historical Society Museum
260.00
468.00
442.00
650.00
520.00
650.00
650.00
1,560.00
(101 S. Maple)
3 S. Emerson
156.00
260.00
286.00
468.00
390.00
468.00
520.00
1,222.00
Fire Station #2
338.00
520.00
546.00
676.00
520.00
910.00
760.00
1,664.00
Lot 8 Parkway
Fire Station #2
156.00
260.00
260.00
260.00
390.00
390.00
520.00
1,040.00
Well 05
182.00
260.00
286.00
520.00
780.00
600.00
520.00
1.378.00
Gregory/Wilnam Lot
442.00
364.00
728.00
962.00
910.00
1,170.00
650.00
2,730.00
(Also along Rand Rd.)
Wen 017
546.00
416.00
1,014.00
1,040.00
910.00
1,924.00
650.00
3,120.00
Eucild/Rt. 83
520.00
416.00
1,014.00
1,040.00
910.00
1,924.00
650.00
3,120.00
Village Hail
156.00
260.00
260.00
208.00
260.00
260.00
520.00
910.00
Total
$ 18,200.00
$ 23,608.00
S 25,480.00
S 30.381.00
$ 32,760.00
E 33,124.00
S 36,530.00
$ 88,634.00
1 - Figures adjusted In accordance to extended
cast.
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: March 16, 1990
SUBJECT: Engineering Study
High Service Pump Replacement Phase 3
Attached is a proposal from Greeley and Hansen Engineers for
engineering services in connection with the replacement of a
high service pump at Pumping Station #11. This is part of our
water distribution facility improvement plan, and I recommend
acceptance of their proposal in an amount not to exceed $5800.
HLW/td
attach.
c: Carol Fields
PARTNERS
EL MER F. SALLO'ITI
RDSE T M. ZIMMERMAN
PAUL E LANGDON, JA
ALLAN 8. EDWARDS
PAULA. KUHN
ARTHUR H. ADAMS
WALLACE A. AMBROSE
RONALD E. BI7.2ARRI
THOMAS J, $111..11—
�SS0011 E,
1011IDE M. $,A(„1.1
RIC:r IARC II MIIKIF
r..
I:'OIIAIiL I f'. MAAt':'1I
JE�4div C;.. I1,1611
J f,7r-IM R, "laIIAAN
MICrIARD Eh P_w-ARI')'r
.I(:n"nv D. .n.LIIv.Sx:I(v
rvaFir*"I v. JK '0
1-11)L.C! II7. t911 K`-
.1C�Ek(�rl
IA,
o�A4Ann(s ^1 ra::pvE
�.,I,L,
:4,SI, Ir. IIF01,Irdr,
�I,,I9II rl A.L11,
FC nI'lXV1=W >nJ. fplt;,+"I tt,Ri.'SOnI
Fvtlf.,l-A.EI. I� µs;Kly
171 k,
GYORK
r,>rcr-r c.n7nl'
dgl:tvl::'v n. 'i9H0;7S1iv
/-
GREELEY AND HANSEN
E N G I N E E R S
222 SOUTH RIVERSIDE PLAZA, CHICAGO, ILLINOIS 696065965 • (312) 648-1155
March 15, 1990
Mr. Herbert L. Weeks
Director of Public Works
Village of Mount Prospect
1700 West Central Road
Mount Prospect, 1L 60056
Subject: High Service Pumps Replacement Phase 3
Proposal for Engineering Services
Dear Mr. Weeks:
Based on your telephone conversation with Terry Hodnik on
March 13, 1990, we are pleased to submit a proposal for engineering services
for design necessary for replacement of high service Pump No. 1 at Station
No. 11. Enclosed are three copies of the Scope of Engineering Services and
Summary of Estimated Manhours and Compensation. Total estimated
compensation is $5,800.
We are available to start work upon your authorization and expect to
complete the Phase 3 contract documents within 30 days. We appreciate
the opportunity to submit this proposal to provide engineering services for
the High Service Pump Replacements, and look forward to your favorable
consideration.
TJH:dh
Enclosure
Yours very truly,
GREELEY AND HANSEN
Terrence J. Hodnik, Associate
Allan B. Edwards, Partner
F 0 U N 0 E D 1 N 1 9 1 4
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SCOPE OF ENGINEERING SERVICES
for
REPLACEMENT OF HIGH SERVICE PUMP NO. 1 AT STATION NO. 11
Greeley and Hansen
March 1990
A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The PROJECT comprises furnishing engineering services required for the
design and preparation of contract documents for the replacement of existing
Pump No. 1 at Pump Station No. 11 with a higher efficiency pumping unit.
B. SCOPE OF SERVICES BY GREELEY AND HANSEN
1. Conduct Field Survey and Obtain Basic Data:
Field survey to obtain measurements of field piping and equipment,
photograph existing facilities, and review existing electrical power
service and motor control center facilities. Obtain available facility
plan drawings and electrical schematic diagrams of existing facilities.
2. Fire Flow Testing
Conduct fire flow testing near Tank Farm at Station 16 and submit
report of findings.
3. Design Electrical and Mechanical Connections:
Conduct hydraulic analysis and select pump equipment.
Design mechanical piping connections for new pump.
Size electrical wires and conduit. Determine motor starter
modifications and select motor protection devices.
Prepare electrical and instrumentation schematic diagrams.
4. Contract Documents:
Prepare contract drawings and specifications for demolition work, pump
installation, piping connections, electrical modifications and
instrumentation modifications. Combine contract documents for
Pump No. 1 replacement at Station No. 11 with contract documents
prepared under another Phase 2 of the project for replacing Pump No. 3
at Station No. 16.
C. SERVICES PROVIDED BY VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
1. Assemble basic data available from existing Village records.
2. Provide services of water operations supervisor to assist during fire
flow testing and field survey and start-up testing at Station No. 11.
3. Provide for removal of any asbestos pipe insulation prior to construction
operations to replace pumping units.
„ VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
SUMMARY OF ESTIMATED MANHOURS AND COMPENSATION
for
REPLACEMENT OF HIGH SERVICE PUMP NO. 1 AT STATION NO. 11
Greeley and Hansen
March 1990
A. ESTIMATED MANHOURS
Task
1. Field Survey and Basic Data
2. Fire Flow Tests
3. Design
4. Contract Documents
Total
B. ESTIMATED COMPENSATION
1. Estimated Direct Labor Costs
Partner
Project Manager
Engineer
Electrical Engineer
Text Editing
Subtotal
2. Salary Costs, Overhead and Profit
Direct Labor x 2.0
3. Other Direct Costs
Local Travel 150 miles @ $0.26
Film & Processing
Subtotal
Estimated
hrs.
Direct, Labor
- Hours_
$ 90
22
Proj.
@
Elect.
Text
Partner
Mgr.
En¢r•
Ener.
Editing
0
2
12
4
0
0
16
0
0
2
1
2
16
6
0
1
2
20
4
4
2 22 48 10 6
2
hrs.
@
$45.00
$ 90
22
hrs.
@
$30.00
660
48
hrs.
@
$16.50
792
10
hrs.
@
$30.00
300
6
hrs.
@
$12.00
72
$ 1,914
$ 3,828
$ 39
19
$ 58
Total Estimated Compensation $ 5,800
Village c�,—Acunt Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: March 28, 1990
SUBJECT: Recommendation for Schoenbeck Road Reconstruction -
Persimmon Ln. to Camp McDonald Road
On March 28, 1990, at 10:00 A.M. , sealed bids ere received for
the Schoenbeck Road Reconstruction. At this time, the sealed bids
were publicly opened and read aloud.
RID FORM
The Bidder was requested to submit unit, prices for a total of
23 individual bid items.
BIDS RECEIVED
Fifteen contractors received Contract Bid Documents. A total
of four contractors submitted bids. The'bids range from a low of
$377,845.75 by Lenny Hoffman Excavating to a high of $697,373.50
by Kovilic Construction. The Engineer's Estimate for the project
was $424,010.00.
ANALYSIS OF BIDS
All Bidders submitted Bid Bonds in the amount of 10% of their
total bid as required by the . Contract Documents. All Bidders
correctly signed their bids and bid bonds. The lowest bid was
10.9% below the estimate.
BIDDER TQTAL BID
Lenny Hoffman Excavating $377,845.75
Martam Construction Co. $418,659.00
MCC Contractors $435,903.00
Kovilic Construction Co. $697,373.50*
* At the bid opening, this bid was read as $530.063.50. A
check of their unit prices indicated a bid error.
Page 2
March 28, 1990
QUALIFICATIONS OF LOW BIDDE
Lenny Hoffman Excavating, Inc. has not performed any recent
projects for the Village. This company has done work for both the
Village of Glenview and the Village of Wilmette. Both Villages
have not encountered problems with this contractor. While this
contractor has not done any recent work for the village of Mount
Prospect, they are well known in the northern suburbs'.
RECOMMENDATION
The Engineering Division recommends awarding this contract to
Lenny Hoffman Excavating, Inc. for $377,845.75. This project will
be funded from the 1990/91 Budget under Acct. #01-071-04-8306.
This project involves a jurisdictional transfer with the Cook
Co. Highway Dept. The County will reimburse the Village for this
cost based on the attached Agreement.
Robert Pszanka
I concur with this Recommendation
Charles Bencic, Director of inspection services
RP/m
Village of Mount Prospect
Schoenbeck Road Reconstruction
March 28, 1990
10:00 A.M.
No.
Item
Estimated
Quantity
1.
Bit. Conc. Surface Crse Cl 1, Type 1 Mix D
330 Ton
2.
Bit. Conc. Binder Crse CI 1, Type 1
676 Ton
3.
Aggregate Base Crse Type B
5049 Ton
4.
Comb. Conc. Curb & Gutter Ty B 6.12
3008 LF
5.
SubBase Granular Material Type B
5874 CY
6.
Earth Excavation
12320 CY
7.
Storm Sewers, RCCP, Type 1, 12"
810 LF
8.
Precast Reinforced Conc Flared End Sed., 12"
2 Ea
9.
Precast Reinforced Conc Flared End Sed., 30"
1 Ea
10.
Storm Sewer Removal, 30"
80 LF
11.
Storm Sewers, RCCP, Type 1, 30"
90 LF
12.
inlet Ty A w/Type I Frame, O.L.
2 Ea
13.
Catch Basin Ty C w/Type I Frame, O.L.
I Ea
14.
Catch Basin Ty A w/Type I Frame, O.L.
4 Ea
15.
Manhole Ty A w/Type I Frame, C.L. (5' Din.)
1 Ea
16.
Storm Sewer 12" -Plug & Abandon
2 Ea
17.
Granular Trench Backfill
756 Ton
18.
Pavement Marking
86,240.00
9.00
A. Thermoplastic Pvt Marking -4" (Yellow)
2600 LF
123,200.00
B. Thermoplastic Pvt Marldngd" (White)
240 LF
9.00
C. Thermopt Pvt Marking -Letters & Symbols
55 Lf
18,630.00
D. Thermoplastic Pvt Marking -(12" Yellow)
1400 LF
19.
Barrier Fabric
6435 SY
20.
Sod Restoration
1650 SY
21.
Tree Removal
240.00
480.00
A. Tree Removal (6" To 15" Dia.)
63 Ea
400.00
B. Tree Removal (Over 15" Dia.)
14 Ea
22.
Traffic Control During Construction
I LS
23.
Golf Course Driveway Extensions
1 LS
Lenny Hoffman
Wilmette 111 60091
Martam Const Co
Glen Ellyn III, 60137
MCC Contr, Inc
Cicero, III, 60650
Kovilic Const Co., Inc.
Chicago 111, 60631
Engineer's Estimate
32.00
10,560.00
38.00
12,540.00
t 34.00
11,220.00
48.00
15,840.00
44.00
14,520.00
25.00
16,900.00
35.00
23,660.00
32.00
21,632.00
45.00
30,420.00
40.00
27,040.00
21.50
108,553.50
14.001
70,686.00
12.25
61,850.25
18.00
90,882.00
20.00
100,980.00
11.50
34,592.00
12.00
36,096.00
9.60
28,876.80
15.00
45,120.00
12.00
36,096 00
8.00
46,992.00
15.00
88,110.00
19.80
116,305.20
19.00
111,606.00
9.00
52,81,
7.00
86,240.00
9.00
110,880.00
10.00
123,200.00
8.00
98,560.00
9.00
110,880.00
23.00
18,630.00
24.00
19,440.00
25.00
20,250.00
39.00
31,590.00
25.00
20,250.00
350.00
700.00
240.00
480.00
290.001
580.00
400.00
800.00
350.00
700.00
750.00
750.00
440.00
440.00
480.00
480.00
800.00
800.00
600.00
600.00
20.00
1,600.00
15.00
1,200.00
4.00
320.00
50.00
4,000.00
5.00
400.00
50.00
4,500.00
42.00
3,780.00
44.00
3,960.00
70.00
6,300.00
40.00
3,600.00
555.00
1,110.00
550.00
1,100.00
700.00
1,400.00
600.00
1,200.00
650.00
1,300.00
990.00
990.00
600.00
600.00
850.00
850.00
700.00
700.00
800.00
800.00
1,105.00
4,420.00
1,340.00
5,360.00
1,200.00
4,800.00
1,500.00
6,000.00
1,100.00
4,400.00
1,303.00
1,300.00
220.00
220.00
1,500.00
1,500.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,200.00
1,200.00
400.00
800.00
50.00
100.00
100.00
200.00
100.00
200.00
100.00
200.00
3.00
2,268.00
11.00
8,316.00
12.50
9,450.00
25.00
18,900.00
30.00
22,680.00
1.00
2,600.00
0.50
1,300.00
0.50
1,300.00
65.00
169,000.00
0.82
2,132
1.00
240.00
1.20
288.00
0.90
216.00
1.20
288.00
0.75
180:.,.,
4.00
220.00
5.00
275.00
2.70
148.50
5.00
275.00
2.00
110.00
1.40
1,960.00
2.00
2,800.00
1.50
2,100.00
1.65
2,310.00
1.00
1,400.00
1.15
7,400.25
0.80
5,148.00
0.95
6,113.25
2.50
16,087.50
0.60
3,861.00
3.00
4,950.00
4.00
6,600.00
7.50
12,375.00
6.50
10,725.00
1.50
2,475.00
140.00
8,820.00
80.00
5,040.00
14.00
882.00
250.00
15,750.00
132.00
8,316.00
250.00
3,500.00
200.00
2,800.00
21.00
294.00
430.00
6,020.00
216.00
3,024.00
5,300.00
5,300.00
10,600.00
10,600.00
5,000.00
5,000.00
10,000.00
10,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
1,950.00
1,950.00
800.00
800.00
600.00
600.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
2,000.00
I Total 377,845.75
Total 418,659.00
Total 435,903.00
1 Total 697,373.50 �
Total 424,010.00
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM M ary USA
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: March 16, 1990
SUBJECT: Detention/Storm Water Improvement - Melas Park
On March 13, 1990, sealed bids were opened for a contract to
reroute the storm water from the Public Works facility to a new
area in Melas Park and to provide compensatory storage as re-
quired by MWRD regulations. This work is being done to increase
the usable recreation area at Melas Park that is currently being
contemplated by the Mount Prospect and Arlington Heights Park
Districts.
Attached are the bid tabulation and recommendation presented by
our consulting engineer, Donohue and Associates, Inc. They
recommend acceptance of the lowest bid.as submitted by Martam
Construction Inc. Martam's base bid was for $89,420, which
included sodding the new detention basin area. There is an
alternate method of awarding the bid by substituting grass seed
and mulch in lieu of sod, for a $17,420 savings. I would recom-
mend that we take advantage of this cost savings and award the
bid to Martam. Construction Inc. in an amount not to exceed
$72,000.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
March 16, 1990
Honorable President and Board of Trustees
Village of Mount Prospect
100 South Emerson Street
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
ENGINEERS Attn: John Dixon,
Village Manager
ARCHITECTS
SCIENTISTS Re: Detention Improvement -
Public Works Building,
Melas Park Storm Sewer
Donohue Project No. 17201
Dear President Farley and Trustees:
Pursuant to the Official Notice to Bidders, sealed bids for the
above referenced projects were received at the office of the
Village Manager, John Fulton Dixon on March 13, 1990, at 10:00
A.M. and publicly opened and read aloud. We have reviewed all
the bids received for the Detention Improvement Contract and have
attached a copy of the Bid Tabulation for your information.
We take this opportunity to submit to the Village Board our writ-
ten recommendations concerning the Conditional Award of Contract.
Six sealed bids were received for the Detention Improvement -
Public Works Building. The low bid was submitted by Martam
Construction, Inc., of Glen Ellyn, Illinois in the amount of
$89,420.00. The second low bid was submitted by William J. Olson
of Rosemont, Illinois in the amount of $95,280.45.
It is our opinion that the low Bidder on the Contract submitted a
responsive bid and is qualified and capable of performing the
work as specified. It is therefore recommended that the Contract
for storm water detention improvements to service the Public
Works building be conditionally awarded to Martam Construction,
Inc.in the amount of $89,420.00.
8 1501 Malfield Kxul
Suite 200 Fast
Schaumburg, Illinois 60173
708.6a5.8800
Telefax 708 605 8914
There is an opportunity to reduce the price of this construction
if seeding is substituted for the sodding called for in the con-
struction documents. A supplemental unit price was bid for
seeding with mulch to be used if temporary erosion control was
required on areas where the excess excavated material was spread.
Martam Construction in a telephone conversation of March 15th
stated that they would be agreeable to the deletion of sodding
from the contract and utilizing seeding at the supplemental bid
price. This change would result in a decrease in the contract
amount of $17,420 yielding a revised total of $72,000.00. If the
ENGINEERS reduction is desired, the Village may wish to conditionally award
ARCHITECTS the contract contingent on the change from sodding to seeding at
SCIENTISTS the unit prices bid.
We will be pleased to answer any questions concerning the recom-
mendations set forth herein.
Very truly yours,
DONOHUE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Thomas J. Rowlett
Senior Civil Engineer
TJR:dlc
enc: Tabulation of Bids
T/L/CT7
Mr. John Dixon
March 16, 1990
Page 2
FABULATION OF BIDS
DONCHUE i ASSOCIATES, INC.
NAFN: VINCENT DIVITO, INC MARTAM CONST. INC. NOSE
,ETEMTION IMPROVEMENTS - PUBLIC WORKS WILDING
810 IN AVE.
INC.
AND
1UNICIPALITY: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DATE: 13 MAR 90
ADDRESS
TIME: 10:00 AN
OF
551 EDENS LANE
BIDDER
ITEMSUNIT QUANTITY
7401 WILLOW SPRINGS
1. UNCLASSIFIED EXCAVATION AS SPEC. LUMP 1
60137
SUM
EAST DLRDEE,IL60118
?. TOPSOIL 4" AS SPEC.
S0.
5800
708-790.1414
708-446-7095
YARD
708-390-91123
708-354-0544
1- SODOING-SALT TOLERANT AS SPEC.
SD.
�S8
UNIT
YARD
UNlf9COS i
:. PAVEMENT REMOVAL AMD BITUMINOUS
50.
23
REPLACEMENT 9`,AS SPEC.
YARD
'
3_ RESTRICTOR ASSEMBLY, CONP AS SPEC.
LUW
_.TALL
Sim
--TONAL
S- 27" STORM SEVER. COMP. AS SPEC
LINEAR
320
FEET
1. STOMP! SEWER, COMP, AS SPEC.
LINEAR
SSS
FEET
9. 21' COMBINED SEWER, CAMP. AS SPEC.
LINEAR
10
FEET
)- RELOCATION OT EXIST 27" FLARED
LUMP
END SECTIgM AMO GRATE, COMP. AS SPEC.
SUI
10. 12• FLARED END SECTION WITR GRATE,
EACH
1
C". AS SPEC
11. MANHOLE " D#METER, COMiP.AS SPEC.
TACO
1
i2. MAMMOLE 60' DIAMETER, COMP. AS SPEC.
EACH
T
13. MANHOLE 48^ 01AMEIER WITH
EACH
1
DROP CONNECTION, COMPL AS SPEC.
14. CATCH BASIN 72" DIAMETER,
EACN
1
COMP. AS SPEC.
15. CATCM BASIN 60" DIAMETER,
EACH
1
CAW. AS SPEC.
B ASSOC. AMERICAN CUTTING WILLIAM J. OLSON SUBURBAN GENERAL
23 N. OSD POSS ST.
810 IN AVE.
INC.
SYSTEMS, INC.
P.O. BOX 758
CONSTRUCTION, INC.
GLEN ELLYN, IL. 601
GLEN ELLYN, It.
551 EDENS LANE
455 EAST MAIN
ROSEMONT. IL 60018
7401 WILLOW SPRINGS
60137
NORNTFIELD,IL 60093
EAST DLRDEE,IL60118
COUNTRYSIDE. IL60525
708-690-9181
708-790.1414
708-446-7095
708.551-9666
708-390-91123
708-354-0544
UNIT.COST-,iiTALO
UNtT-COST--TIT7DD
UNIT
UNlf9COS i
{Alli-COST�.11765L7y
DD#T, COST
-COST
--TAI-
_.TALL
--TONAL
I A B U L A T I O N O F B I D S DOMONUE S ASSOCIATES, INC.
......... ........... .............>........._____.___.__...._..>.._____..._.__..._____-________________________...>
DETENTION IMPROVEMENTS - PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
NAME
VINCENT DIVITO, INC
NARTAN CDMST. INC.
AND
23 W. 050 FOSS ST.
BIO NORTH AVE.
*UNICIPALITY: VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT DATE: 13 NAR 90
ADDRESS
GLEN ELLVN, IL. 601
GLEN ELLVN, IL
TIME: 10:00 AM
DF
60137
BIDDER
708-690-9161
708-790.1414
t ».._.._.._. ....I TENS ..._._...>....__.>--1t
I➢_...
r.....TY•
- _....
UNii COST i>_......
TOTAL
U.......COST
i-------
TOTAL
>
COMP. AS SPEC.
SUPPLEMENTAL UNIT PRIG
FOR SEEDING WITH MULCH
....................................................................................
RICAN
GENERAL
EDENS UMEC YSTEEMST INC.MAICUTTING R10OSERBOX 756 60016 GOAT Y ILIAL SPNNC.
IT_CDSTI. TOTAL r,UNIT,COSTI TOTAL.>I INIiT COSI --TOTAL>. jUNli -COST --TOTAL
Village of Mount Prospect Wu
Mount Prospect, Illinois
AN
L
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Engineering Coordinator
DATE: March 28, 1990
SUBJECT: 1990 Material Testing Contract
The Engineering Division solicited three engineering
consulting firms to perform required material testing for Village
street projects in 1990. The three firms are:
1.) Soil and Material Consultants, Inc.
Arlington Heights, IL
2.) H.H. Holmes Testing Laboratories, Inc.
Wheeling, IL
3.) S.T.S. Consultants, Ltd.
Northbrook, IL
S.T.S. Consultants declined to submit a proposal Either of
the remaining two consultants are well qualified to do this type
of testing. The proposed unit prices of Soil and Material+
Consultants are slightly more advantageous to the Village.
Therefore, I recommend awarding this contract to Soil and
Material Consultants, Inc. of Arlington Heights. Last year's final
contract amount was less than $9,000.00. 1 would estimate that
this year's program would be about $15,000.00. Actual cost will
be based on this firm's contract unit rices. Funds will be
available in the 1990/91 Budget under Acct. #01-071-04-8501.
R , I�V� t 4-V-"4 -
Robert Pszanka,
Engineering Coordinator
I concur with this Recommendation
•
CAV(A�
Director of Inspection Services
RP/m
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Director.
DATE: March 30, 1990
SUBJECT: Adoption of Budget Ordinance
Attached is the Ordinance providing for an Annual Budget i . n lieu of an
Appropriation Ordinance, and a copy of the Public Notice establishing a Public
Hearing on April 17, 1990. The Notice indicates the revised budget amounts as
a result of the changes approved by the Village Board on March 27, 1990 and the
inclusion of the Library's budget request. A detailed listing of each item that
has changed is being prepared and will be available prior to the second reading
of the Ordinance.
The following procedures are required before the budget can be adopted:
1. Announcement at the Village Board meeting on April 3, 1990 of a
public hearing on the tentative annual budget to be held on April 17,
1990.
2. First reading of the Budget Ordinance on April 3, 1990.
3. Publication of the Public Notice of the Budget Hearing on April 5,
1990 in the Mount Prospect Herald.
4. Public Hearing on April 17, 1990 on the tentative annual budget.
5. Adoption of the Budget Ordinance on April 17, 1990.
6. Filing a copy of the Budget Ordinance with the County Clerk after
adoption.
The revised copies of the budget will then be compiled and will be available
prior to May 1, 1990.
DCJ/sm
Enc
PUBLIC NOTICE
A eumqrc Hearing will be held on April 17, 1990 for all interested citizens of
the Village of mount Prospect, Illinois. The following uvogot is proposed for
fiscal year beginning may 1, 1990;
Village Funds:
General Fund . . . . . . , . , . . . , , .
. . $17,989,500
Special Revenue r"nuo . . . , . , . . . .
, . 2,932.725
Debt service runus. . . , , . - . , . . .
. . 1,324,530
Capital Projects runun. , . , . . , . . .
. . 4145.165
Enterprise rundo. , . . ^ - . . . . . . .
. . 6,849'015
Internal Service Fund . . , . . , . - . .
, . 2,134,200
Pension Funds , . , , . . , . . ^ . . , ,
, , 3,431,000
Totals , . . . - , . . . .
. , $40,80 135
Less Intecrunu rrenoreca.
. . 7
Totals - Village ru"un . .
, , m4u,wm,3u5
Library rvnn . . , . . . , , - . . , ^ , , ^.
^ . 20
Totals - Village and Library rvnum. . . .
.
The meeting will be held in the Mount Prospect Senior Center, 50 South Emerson
Street, Mount rcnapact, Illinois, for the purpose or discussion of the
proposed uvugot at 7'30 p.m. The proposed budget may be examined on weekdays
in the Office of the Village Clerk in the Village Hall, 100 S. Emerson street,
Mount Prospect, Illinois between a:,n a.m. and 5,00 p.m. All interested
citizens will have the opportunity to give written and ural comments. Senior
Citizens aro encouraged to attend and comment.
aoxw ruLrow DIXON
Published in Mt. Prospect Herald April 5, 1990.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN onozwxmcs xooprzmo AN AwmuxL ounocT FOR THE
VILLAGE Or w8uwT PROSPECT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
Cm*wsmczmu MAY 1, 1990 TO Apno 30, 1*91 IN
LIEU OF PASSAGE OF AN APPROPRIATION ORDINANCE
wxsRsAs, the President and Board of Trustees or the village of Mount Prospect in
accordance with Statutes, have v,o"iueu for the preparation and adoption or an
annual budget in lieu or passage or an Appropriation Ordinance for the fiscal year
commencing may 1, 1990 to April )O° 1991; and
WHEREAS, the tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect for the
fiscal year beginning May l, 1990 and ending April 30, 1991, as prepared by the
Budget Officer for the Village and submitted to the President and Board of
Trustees, was nza,eu on rue in the orrice or the Village Clerk on April r, l*po,
for public inspection, as provided by Statute; and
w*En[As, pursuant to notice duly vu*zioxeu on April 5, 1990, a public hearing was
hazo by the President and Board of 7rvatoem on said tentative annual uvgyet on
April 17, 1990, as provided by statute; and
WHEREAS, following said public hearing, said tentative annual budget was reviewed
or the President and evacu of 7cvoteen and a copy or said tentative annual uvuuet
is attached hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
NOW, TxEnsro8c, BE IT oRDAzws0 BY THE pnc5zocwT AND 8Uxno or Tnosrccs or THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECT The tentative annual budget for the Village of Mount Prospect
Eeuinnino may 1, 1990 and ending April 30, 1991, o copy of which is attached
hereto and made apart hereof, is hereby approved and adopted asthe Annual Budget
for the Village of Mount Prospect for said fiscal year.
sccT : Within thirty (30) days following the adoption or this Ordinance
there shall be filed with the count, Clerk or Cook County a copy thereof duly
oectirlou by the village Clerk and Estimate or Revenues by source anticipated to
be received by the Village in the fiscal year beginning May 1, 1990 and ending
April 30, 1991, duly certified by the Chief Fiscal Officer.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its pass age, appzo,ul and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by
NAYS:
pAs5co AND xPpnnvco this 1
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
Village of ''fount Prospect
Mow-i-c"Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Mayor, Village Board, and Village Manager
FROM: Cheryl L. Pasalic, Cable Television Administrator
DATE: March 29, 1990
RE: Update on Perkers complaint -1350 W. Northwest Highway
As directed at the March 20 Village Board meeting, I am reporting
back to you on whether Mr. Perkers of 1350 W. Northwest Highway
will be installed with cable service by April 3 as requested. Mr.
Perkers will not have service yet by this date, but significant
progress has been made on the complaint since my last report. As
I reported last week, TCI was sent back to the drawing board with
their designs for getting cable to this site because of errors in
the proximity to private property. Revised plans were submitted
on Wednesday, March 28. After inspection by Jerry McIntosh of
Public Works, a permit for construction was issued late in the day
on March 28.
According to Dan Budinger of TCI, locates were called into
J.U.L.I.E. by this morning. Providing all goes as hoped, he will
have those locates in place by Monday, April 2. if that is
accomplished, and weather allows, construction will begin on
Monday, April 2. Construction, including boring under Northwest
Highway, and boring under all the trees in the parkway along the
highway, will be a little tricky. If all goes well, in the best
case scenario, construction will be done by Wednesday, April 4.
The TCI Sales Department will then be contacted and will proceed
with contacting Mr. Perkers. I inquired why Mr. Perkers had not
been contacted yet and was told that that would not be the usual
procedure. Potential customers are contacted after cable is
available. I have placed a call to Mr. Perkers to update him.
The earliest that Mr. Perkers could possibly have service would be
Thursday, April 5. This does not seem likely as that would be less
than 24 hours from the earliest time it could be turned over to
Sales. I would anticipate service to realistically go into effect
between April 6 and April 13.
I will continue to monitor the progress of this complaint and will
have a further update for you at the April 3 Village Board meeting.
I am anticipating the attendance of Mark Hess of TCI at this
meeting for any questions you may have.
Mount 0'rospect Public Works Dii0artment
INTEROFFICE •
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Deputy Director Public Works
DATE: March 26, 1990
SUBJECT: Village Sewer Rehab Grant
The Illinois Environmental Protection Agency (IEPA) has approved
our grant application for the rehabilitation of the Village's
sanitary sewer system. The original grant request was for
$305,094, of which the Village would have received 70%, or
$213,566.
The IEPA has revised the original request to reflect actual bid
contract prices. The new amount is $560,593, of which we will
receive 70%, or $392,415.
At this time, it is necessary to request the Village Board adopt
the attached Resolution accepting the grant and also authorizing
the Village Manager to sign the necessary grant agreement. I
request this action be taken at the April 3rd Village Board
meeting. Our acceptance of the grant is due into IEPA by April
is, 1990.
(;len R. A-ndTer/
GRA/td
attach.
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION
OF A GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY.
WHEREAS, The State of Illinois enacted an Environmental Protec-
tion Act which provides in part for the control of water pollu-
tion in Illinois; and
WHEREAS, the Pollution Control Board pursuant to said Act has
adopted regulations establishing water quality standards and
effluent limitations which must be attained by the Village of
Mount Prospect in the operation of its sewage treatment plant
and associated works; and
WHEREAS, grant funds have been provided by the State of Illinois
to assist local governments in the construction of facilities
which will ensure compliance with the standards and limitations
established by the Environmental Protection Act and regulations
adopted Pursuant thereto; and
WHEREAS, the Village of Mount Prospect has made application for
a grant from the State of Illinois for the design and construc-
tion of a sewage treatment improvement and/or modification
project which will satisfy the requirements of the Environmental
Protection Act and the regulations adopted pursuant thereto; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Protection Agency of the State of
Illinois has made an offer of grant for said project designated
as C17-3029, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit A hereto;
and
WHEREAS, the corporate authorities, after due investigation and
consideration, have determined that acceptance of said grant
offer and entering into a grant agreement with the State of
Illinois will serve the Public good and is necessary to ensure
compliance with the Environmental Protection Act and regulations
adopted thereunder;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Mayor and the Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect, Cook County, Illinois:
SECTION ONE: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees hereby find
as —facts all of the recitals in the Preamble of this Resolution
as well as the description of the project contained in the grant
offer (Exhibit A hereto).
SECTION TWO: That the Mayor and Board of Trustees hereby
accept said—offer and agree to all terms and conditions thereof,
including all special conditions, general conditions and assur-
ances contained therein and made a part hereof by reference and
also agree that the grant funds awarded will be used solely for
the purposes of the project as approved by the Environmental
Protection Agency of the State of Illinois in accordance with
the terms and conditions of said grant offer.
SECTION THREE: That the Village Manager is authorized and
directed execute the said grant offer on or before April 5,
1990, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit A.
SECTION FOUR That the clerk be and is hereby directed to
--
file a certified
ied copy of this Resolution with the said executed
grant offer and transmit sufficient copies of the same to the
Environmental Protection Agency of the State of Illinois at
Springfield, Illinois on or before April 15, 1990.
SECTION FIVE: This Resolution shall be in full force and
effect from and after its passage and approval as provided by
law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED AND APPROVED this day of 1989.
Gerald L. Farley
Mayor
Attest: