HomeMy WebLinkAbout3558_001, 6§
Next Ordinance No. 4148 1
Next Resolution No. 13-90
A G E N D A
VILLAGE CLERK
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
0 R D E R 0 F B U S I N E S S
REGULAR MEETING
Meeting Location: Meeting Date
Meeting Room, 1st Floor Tuesday
Senior citizen center March 6, 1990
50 South Emerson Street 7:30 P. M.
Mount Prospect, Illinois 60056
I. CALL TO ORDER
Ii. ROLL CALL
AWNWIMMMINWWW
MARCH 6, 1990
and Time:
Mayor Gerald I'Skip'l Parley
Trustee Ralph Arthur Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee Mark Busse Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Timothy Corcoran Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
III. INVOCATION - Trustee Wattenberg
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES OF REGULAR MEETING, February 20, 1990
V. APPROVAL OF BILLS
Vi. COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
VII. MAYOR'S REPORT
A. 2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13
OF THE VILLAGE CODE
This Ordinance creates a Class "W" liquor license
for the Mickey's Diner, formerly Arnold's at
Busse Avenue and Main Street. (Exhibit A)
VIII. OLD BUSINESS
A. Pate Subdivision, 1000 Cardinal Lane
1. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS
FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
This Ordinance eliminates the requirement for
sidewalks on the cul de sac; increases the
permitted length of the cul de sac; reduces the
minimum lot widths on 4 lots; permits parkway
trees to be planted on private property; and,
permits a pavement width of 27 feet. (Exhibit B)
2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A RECAPTURE AGREEMENT IN CONJUNCTION WITH
THE DEVELOPMENT OF PROPERTY KNOWN AS PATE'S
SUBDIVISION (Exhibit C)
3. Pate's Plat of Subdivision
B. ZBA 1-V-90, 103 South Edward
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 103 S. EDWARD ST.
This Ordinance grants a variation to permit a zero
foot front yard and 41 811 side yard to permit a
parking pad. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended denying these requests by a vote of 2-5. (Exhibit D)
C. ZBA 4-V-90, 1000 South Na Wa Ta
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1000 NA WA TA
This ordinance grants variations to permit
a storage shed 10-1/2' high. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended approving this height
variation by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit E)
D. ZBA 9-V-90, 4 North Pine
2nd reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A VARIATION
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 4 NORTH PINE STREET
This Ordinance grants variations to permit
a 3.5 side yard instead 5 feet and a 23 foot front
yard instead of 30 feet. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended denying the side yard variation
by a vote of 0-7 and recommended granting the
front yard variation by a vote of 7-0. (Exhibit F)
E. Southwest corner of Elmhurst & Algonquin Roads
1. ZBA 81-Z-89 and ZBA 82 -SU -89
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE
OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE VILLAGE OF
MOUNT PROSPECT
This Ordinance rezones the subject property
from B-3 to I-1. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting this request by a vote
of 6-0. (Exhibit G)
2. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A
SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF A PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
ROGERS SUBDIVISION
This ordinance grants a Special Use in the
nature of a Planned Unit Development to
permit 3 office/warehouse buildings.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
granting this request by a vote of 6-0. (Exhibit H)
1st reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING
MODIFICATIONS FROM THE DEVELOPMENT CODE
FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS ROGERS
SUBDIVISION
This ordinance grants modifications
from the Development Code (Chapter 16)
to permit storm water detention in the
loading dock areas. (Exhibit J)
F:0 ZBA 8 -SU -90, 1641 S. Busse Road (Plaza United
Shopping Center)
ist reading of AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL
USE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 1641 S. BUSSE ROAD
This ordinance grants a Special Use to permit
an auto service operation in a B-3 District.
The proposal is to establish a sales and
installation operation of cellular car phones.
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
denying this request by a vote of 3-2. (Exhibit K)
IX. NEW BUSINESS
A. 1st reading of AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF AN INTERIM PROJECT USE AGREEMENT
This ordinance authorizes an intergovernmental
agreement relative to solid waste. (Exhibit L)
B. ZBA
•r 705 S. Busse -•.:
The Petitioner is requesting • to
allow a 4.51 setback separation from the
existing garage to the proposed room addition
rather than the required 10 feet, and to allo
a 35.81 front yard instead of the required 40
as required in the R -X District. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended approving these
• • a vote •
C. ZBA 15-V-90, 215 East Prospect Avenue
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a ill side yard to the east and a 25.561 side
yard on the west, instead of the required 301;
to allow the existing front yard of 29.571
instead of the required 301; to allow a 151 rear
yard instead of the required 401; to allow a lot
size of 2.285 acres instead of 4 acres; to allow
two 121 x 351 loading docks instead of the
required 121 x 501; to allow 61 parking spaces
instead of the required 66; to allow a zero foot
distance on the east for parking instead of the
required 101 and 151 on the south instead of the
required 301; and, to allow 84% impervious
surface lot coverage (3,684 sq. ft. over the
maximum) instead of the permitted 80%. The
Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
these requests by a vote of 6-0.
D. ZBA 16-V-90, 218 Autumn Lane
The Petitioner is requesting variations to allow
a driveway width of 261 instead of the permitted
211 and to allow a 101 front yard instead of 301
to permit a parking pad. The Zoning Board of
Appeals recommended granting these requests by
a vote of 5-1.
E. ZBA 76-V-89, 109 West Berkshire
The Petitioner is requesting a variation to allow
a 41 side yard instead of the required 7.51 in
order to expand a garage. The Zoning Board of
appeals recommended granting this request, with
conditions, by a vote of 6-0.
X. VILLAGE MANAGERIS REPORT
A. A RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING MOTOR FUEL TAX FUNDS
This Resolution appropriates $400,000 from
Motor Fuel Tax Funds for the replacement of
Forest Avenue between Memory Lane and Kensington
Road. (Exhibit M)
B. Request to ratify emergency expenditure for
hauling snow.
C. Status Report
X1. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
XII. ADJOURNMENT
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF
THE MAYOR AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES
OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
FEBRUARY 20, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Farley called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present upon roll call:
Mayor Gerald "Skip" Farley
Trustee Ralph Arthur
Trustee Mark Busse
Trustee Timothy Corcoran
Trustee Leo Floros
Trustee George Van Geem
Trustee Theodore Wattenberg
INVOCATION
The invocation was given by Trustee Busse.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran,
moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of the Mayor and Board of Trustees held
February 6, 1990.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floras,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
APPROVAL OF BILLS
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem,
moved to approve the following list of bills:
General Fund
$ 725,143
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
22,509
Community Development Block Grant Fund
10,617
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
61,876
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
356,221
Parking System Revenue Fund
1,983
Risk Management Fund
38,270
P.W. Facility Construction Fund A
-
P.W. Facility Construction Fund B
-
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Rep.Fund
4,129
Special Service Area Const. #5
-
Special Service Area Const. #6
-
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1985)
106,936
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund (1987)
-
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
112,371
Debt Service Funds
-
Flexcomp Trust Fund
13,696
Escrow Deposit Fund
28,426
Police Pension Fund
-
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit Trust Fund
$1,482,177
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem
Nays: Wattenberg
Motion carried.
Page 1 - February 20, 1990
CALL TO ORDER
INVOCATION
APPROVE BILLS
Trustee Wattenberg stated that he objects to the
litigation and legal fees resulting from litigation
relative to the solid waste site and therefore could
not vote in favor of the bills.
Trustee Wattenberg requested the administration to
prepare an audit relative to legal bills. He also
questioned whether competitive bids had been
obtained prior to hiring lawyers. It was also
requested by Trustee Wattenberg that the
administration consider requesting a refund from the
attorneys, that the conflicts be mediated, and that
an opinion be requested as to the personal liability
of those individuals authorizing an over -payment
relative to legal fees.
Trustee Floros, seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved
to accept the financial report dated January 31,
1990, subject to audit.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
COMMUNICATIONS AND PETITIONS - CITIZENS TO BE HEARD
CONFLICT OF Idyl Nipper, 1220 E. Cardinal Lane, noted that a
INTEREST item on the agenda dealing with a request for
rezoning for property at Rand & Euclid may be the
subject of a conflict of interest for Trustee
Wattenberg and requested that he abstain from voting
on that matter.
BUSSE SCHOOL Michael Moran, attorney for Suzuki School of Music
PARKING PROBLEM located at the Busse School, requested further
information as to the Village's intention to remove
the parking area located in the parkway.
Mayor Farley stated that the Busse School parking
problem was listed on the agenda and that subject
would be discussed later in the meeting.
MAYOR'S REPORT
RES. 12-90 Mayor Farley presented a Resolution incorporating
the Constitution Bicentennial celebration with the
July 4th parade by adopting the theme of "To
Establish Liberty and Justice".
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
passage of Resolution No. 12-90
A RESOLUTION IN SUPPORT OF THE CONSTITUTION
BICENTENNIAL CELEBRATION
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
AMEND CH.13 An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
authorize the creation of a Class 11W11 liquor license
for Mickey's Diner (Busse Avenue & Main Street).
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at
the next meeting on March 6th.
Page 2 - February 20, 1990
Mayor Farley stated that due to the large audience
CHANGE IN
attendance, mainly to hear ZBA Case No. 10-Z-90,
ORDER OF
11 -SU -90 and 12-V-90 dealing with property at the
BUSINESS
corner of Rand Road and Euclid Avenue, the order of
business listed on the agenda would be changed.
ZBA 1-V-90, 103 South Edward
ZBA 1-V-90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
103 S.EDWARD
would permit a zero foot front yard and 4.81 side
yard in order to locate a parking pad in the front
yard. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
denying these requests by a vote of 2-5.
This Ordinance will be presented March 6th for
second reading.
ZBA 2 -SU -90 and ZBA 3-V-90, 800 Kennicott Place
ZBA 2 -SU -90
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that
ZBA 3-V-90
would grant a Special Use to permit a 3 car garage.
800 KENNICOTT
The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended granting
this request by a vote of 6-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur,
seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the
rule requiring two readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
ORD.NO. 4145
passage of Ordinance No. 4145
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR
PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS 800 KENNICOTT PLACE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant variations to permit a garage size of 704
square feet and a driveway width of 291 611. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting these requests by
a vote of 6-0.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Arthur, seconded
by Trustee Wattenberg, moved to waive the rule requiring
two
readings of an Ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved for
ORD.NO. 4146
passage of Ordinance No. 4146
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 800 KENNICOTT PLACE
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros, Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Page 3 - February 20, 1990
ZBA 4-V-90
ZBA 4-V-90, 1000 Na Wa Ta
1000 NA WA TA
An ordinance was presented for first reading that
would grant a variation to permit a shed 10-1/21 in
height, rather than the permitted 10 feet. The Zoning
Board of Appeals recommended granting this variation.
This Ordinance will be presented for second reading at
the March 6th meeting.
ZBA 9-V-90
ZBA 9-V-90, 4 North Pine
4 N. PINE ST
An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
grant variations to permit a 3.5 side yard instead of
the required 5 feet and a 23 foot front yard instead
of the required 30 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended granting the front yard variation by a vote
of 7-0 but unanimously voted to deny the side yard
variation.
This ordinance will be presented March 6th for second
reading.
ZBA 10-Z-90,
ZBA 10-Z-90, ZBA 11 -SU -90 and ZBA 12-V-90
ZBA 11 -SU -90 &
Rand Road and Euclid Avenue Shopping Center
ZBA 12-V-90
The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from R -X
RAND & EUCLID
to B-1 to permit a shopping center; a special Use
to permit a Planned Unit Development; and, a variation
to allow a 20 foot periphery yard instead of the
required 30 feet. The Zoning Board of Appeals
recommended denying this request by a vote of 7-0.
The Petitioner noted that this is a 9 acre parcel,
bordered by Rand Road and Euclid Avenue and backing up
to 5 single family homes. A similar proposal was
presented to the Village last year and was denied.
This proposal reduces the square footage of the
shopping center by 8, 000 sq. f t - It was noted that the
proposed shopping center would be buffered from the
single family homes.
Witnesses were presented by the Petitioner who
testified that this shopping center would not adversely
effect property values of the surrounding homes and
that, from a planning point of view, this location is
appropriate for this type of use. It was also stated
that the Village would benefit through increased
property taxes and sales tax, with the projection of
approximately $300,000 to the Village.
Mention was also made that the Village had retained
consultants and they too stated that this proposed
shopping center would be an appropriate use at this
location.
The Petitioner also stated that all storm water would
be retained on the site and would not effect the
neighbors.
Jane Conrad, 1002 North Prospect, Manor, spoke on behalf
of the residents expressing their opposition to this
property being rezoned to commercial. Mrs. Conrad
noted that the Village had made a commitment to the
residents of the area some years ago, in conjunction
with the defense of a law suit proposing a commercial
use on a portion of the subject property, that the
Village would oppose commercial zoning in this area.
Other concerns expressed by Mrs. Conrad and residents
included - increased traffic, their opinion that
another shopping center is not needed in the area, and
their desire to maintain the residential character of
the area.
Page 4 - February 20, 1990
Mrs. Conrad noted that petitions had been filed
with the Village Clerk, pursuant to the requirements
of Chapter 14, which would require a majority of the
Board to vote in favor of this project in order to
secure approval. Copies of petitions with 1,700
signatures were also presented in opposition to this
proposal.
Inasmuch as Trustee Wattenberg is the attorney for
one of the property owners being the subject of this
proposal, Mayor Farley requested Trustee Wattenberg
to refrain from voting since it would be deemed a
conflict of interest.
Several members of the Board stated that while they
feel this would be a quality development, they could
not support the location.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning
Board of Appeals to deny the rezoning being the
subject of ZBA 10-Z-90.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran,
Floros
Nays: Van Geem
Motion carried.
Inasmuch as the rezoning request failed to receive
approval, the requests being the subject of
ZBA 11 -SU -90 and ZBA 12-V-90 are deemed denied.
Mayor Farley called a brief recess at this point in
the meeting, 11:15 P.M.
The meeting was reconvened at 11:25 P.M.
Present upon roll call: Mayor Farley
Trustee Arthur
Trustee Busse
Trustee Corcoran
Trustee Floros
Trustee Van Geem
Trustee Wattenberg
Mayor Farley presented an ordinance for first reading BUSSE SCHOOL
that would amend Chapter 18 (Traffic Code) by
prohibiting parking on Henry Street between Owen and
William Streets, on both sides of the street.
It was noted that the Village Board had proposed
prohibiting parking on the asphalt parkway on
Henry Street by moving the parking bumpers to the
curb area and prohibiting parking on the Henry Street.
Michael Moran, attorney for Suzuki School, stated that
the proposal would create a problem for both Suzuki School
and the Creative Academy, since 36 parking spaces would
be eliminated without providing spaces elsewhere. He also
stated that the proposed action would create more of a
hazardous condition that the one deemed under the
existing conditions.
Numerous parents of students at this location spoke in
opposition to the proposal.
It was noted by Mayor Farley that the property is owned
by the Mount Prospect Park District and the Village is
attempting to resolve the problem. It was the consensus
of opinion among the Village Board members that one final
Page 5 - February 20, 1990
meeting should be held whereby everyone interested in
this subject, including residents of the area, Park
District officials, officials from the Suzuki and
Creative Academy should be in attendance in order to
resolve this problem.
Mayor Farley stated that such a meeting would take
place on Saturday, March 10th at 11:00 A.M. in the
Senior citizen Center. Notices will be sent announcing
this meeting. Coffee with Council, normally held on
this morning will be held from 10:00 to 11:00 A.M. at
the Village Hall and then the Busse School meeting will
begin.
OLD BUSINESS
PATE SUBDIVISION The Pate Subdivision, 1000 Cardinal Lane.
The subject property is a parcel of land at the west
end of Wildwood Lane. The developer proposed the
creation of 7 lots of record for single family homes.
Also requested, in conjunction with this development
are modifications from the Development Code to
eliminate the sidewalks on the proposed cul de sac, a
cul de sac exceeding the permitted length, parkway
trees, and a modified request to permit a pavement
width of 23 feet, instead of 291. This matter was
continued from previous meetings in order to work out
various details of development. The administration has
worked with the developer in a effort to reach an
agreement as to the improvement of Wildwood Lane at an
acceptable width and to determined the method and
responsibility of payment for certain roadway
improvements.
It was determined that since Wildwood Lane is presently
13 feet wide and the fact that there are utility
easements to the north, preventing additional width,
the improved width would be 23 feet. The developer
will install water mains along Wildwood Lane and
provide the improved roadway for the 2 lots closest to
the proposed subdivision, all of which would be the
subject of a recapture for the developer. The
developer will also make a cash contribution of
$11,800, which is the difference between the 231 wide
street instead of the normal 291 width and one street
light. The Village will install the street for the
balance of Wildwood Lane east to Westgate Road. The
property located on the southwest corner of Wildwood
and Westgate is not included in this improvement.
It was also noted that as the vacant properties are
developed sidewalks will be installed as required and
for the existing property, the Village will install the
sidewalks.
Mr. Ed Labuz, 1215 Wildwood Lane, asked various
questions regarding this development, noting that he
is the only resident on Wildwood Lane. Mr. Labuz had
no objection to this amended proposal.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved to
grant the modifications from the Development Code as
requested in conjiunction with the proposed Pate
Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Kays: None
Motion carried.
Page 6 - February 20, 1990
Mt. Plaines Animal Hospital, 888 E. Northwest Highway MOUNT PLAINES
An Ordinance was presented for second reading that ANIMAL
would waive certain requirements of the Development HOSPITAL
Code (Chapter 16) relative to sidewalk width and 888 NORTHWEST
method of detaining storm water. HIGHWAY
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Busse, moved
for passage of Ordinance No. 4147
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING MODIFICATIONS FROM THE
DEVELOPMENT CODE (CHAPTER 16) OF THE VILLAGE
CODE FOR PROPERTY COMMONLY KNOWN AS
888 EAST NORTHWEST HIGHWAY
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Van Geem left the meeting briefly and was
absent for this vote.
ZBA 81-Z-89 and ZBA 82 -SU -89, Southwest corner of
Elmhurst & Algonquin Roads (Rogers Subdivision)
The Petitioner is requesting rezoning from B-3 to
I-1; a Special Use in the nature of a Planned Unit
Development consisting of 3 office/warehouse
buildings; an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan
to allow industrial/office rather that the existing
commercial/office designation; approval of the
Roger's Plat of Subdivision, creating one lot of
records; and, a request from the Development Code
to permit storm water detention in the loading dock
areas. It was the recommendations of both the
Plan Commission and Zoning Board of Appeals to
grant the respective requests.
The Petitioner noted that the proposal is to
construct a commercial park with 114,000
square feet of office/industrial use on the 7.44
acre site just south of Algonquin Road on the
west side of Elmhurst Road.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals to grant the rezoning request being the
subject of ZBA 81-Z-89.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved
to concur with the recommendation of the Zoning Board
of Appeals and grant the Special Use in the nature of
a Planned Unit Development, being the subject of
ZBA 82 -SU -89.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
concur with the recommendation of the Plan Commission
Page 7 - February 20, 1990
ORD.NO. 4147
ZBA 81-Z-89
ZBA 82 -SU -89
ROGERS SUB.
and grant the modifications from the Development Code
as requested for the Rogers Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ROGER'S SUB.
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to
authorize the Mayor to sign and Clerk to attest his
signature on the Roger's Plat of Subdivision.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
NEW BUSINESS
LAKE CENTER
An ordinance was presented for first reading that would
PLAZA
amend ordinance No. 4029, to extend the effective date
of that Ordinance for one additional year - to March
1991.
At the request of the Petitioner, Trustee Corcoran,
seconded by Trustee Van Geem, moved to waive the rule
requiring two readings of an ordinance.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ORD.NO. 4148
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved for
passage of ordinance No. 4148
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 4029
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
ZBA 8 -SU -90
ZBA 8 -SU -90, Plaza United, Algonquin, Busse,
PLAZA UNITED
Dempster
BUSSE & ALGONQUIN
The Petitioner presented a request for a Special
Use to permit an auto service operation in a B-3
District. The Zoning Board of Appeals recommended
denying this request by a vote of 3-2.
The proposal is to permit the sale and installation of
cellular car phones in this shopping center. An
overhead door would be installed in the rear of the
building for installation of the phone. It was noted
that no vehicle would remain overnight and this
restriction would be made a part of the Ordinance.
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to grant the Special Use request in ZBA 8 -SU -90 -
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
An Ordinance will be presented March 6th.
VILLAGE MANAGER'S REPORT
BID:
Village Manager John Fulton Dixon presented the
Page 8 - February 20, 1990
following bid results for the demolition of the DEMOLITION
Village owned property located at 25 S. Main Street: 25 S.MAIN ST.
Bidder Amount
Albrecht Enterprises $11,340.00
U. S. Dismantlement Corp. $18,848.00
Demolition & Development Co. $21,640.00
J. F. Hauling Co. $22,000.00
Midwest Wrecking Co. $28,674.00
Robinette Demolition Co. $29,200.00
Martam Construction $39,000.00
Trustee Arthur, seconded by Trustee Corcoran, moved ALBRECHT
to concur with the recommendation of the administration ENTERPRISES
and accept the low qualified bid submitted by
Albrecht Enterprises in the amount of $11,340 for the
demolition of 25 South Main Street.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
The Village Manager stated that the demolition would
take place within the next couple of weeks.
Mr. Dixon requested the Board to waive the bidding YARD WASTE
procedure and authorize an expenditure of $8,730.00 BROCHURE
to have an information brochure printed and distributed
to the residents dealing with yard material collection.
These brochures will be mailed in early March.
The following quotes were secured for the printing
stuffing and mailing of these packets:
V & G Printers
R -Printing Co.
$ 8,730.00
$11,096.00
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Arthur, moved to V & G PRINTERS
waive the bidding procedure and authorize an
expenditure of $8,730.00 to V & G Printers for the
printing, stuffing and distribution of this material
to every resident in the Village.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Arthur, Busse, Corcoran, Floros,
Van Geem, Wattenberg
Nays: None
Motion carried.
VILLAGE OWNED
Mr. Dixon noted that the tenants occupying the Village PROPERTY
owned property at 1 South Pine have vacated the property 1S. PINE ST.
and rather than leave the 2 -flat empty, that building
will also be demolished at the same time as 25 S. Main
Street, which should be within the next few weeks.
ANY OTHER BUSINESS
None.
ADJOURNMENT
Trustee Corcoran, seconded by Trustee Wattenberg, moved
to adjourn the meeting.
Upon roll call: Ayes: Unanimous
Motion carried.
The meeting was adjourned at 1:27 A.M.
Carol A. Fields, village Clerk
Page 9 - February 20, 1990
General & Special Revenue Funds
General Fund
Motor Fuel Tax Fund
Community Development Block Grant Fund
Illinois Municipal Retirement Fund
Enterprise Funds
Waterworks & Sewerage Fund
Parking System Revenue Fund
Risk Manaqement Fund
Capital Projects
Capital Improvement, Repl. or Repair Fund
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1985
Downtown Redev. Const. Fund 1987
Corporate Purpose Improvement 1990
Debt Service Funds
Trust & Aaencv Funds
Flexcomp Trust Fund
Escrow Deposit Fund
Police Pension Fund
Firemen's Pension Fund
Benefit. Trust Funds
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
CASH POSITION
February 28, 1990
Cash & Invest.
Receipts
Disbursements
Cash & Invest.
Balance
2/16/90 Through
Per Attached
Journal Balance
2/15/90
2/28/90
List of Bills
Entry 2/28/90
$ 2,016,138
$282,774
$461,556
$ 1,837,356
377,433
90,504
6,935
461,002
8,113
10,113
3,772
14,454
1,979
32,549
11,289
23,239
2,662,973
141,660
56,964
2,747,669
238,957
5,752
1,201
243,508
1,043,133
103,942
68,114
1,078,961
587,222
17,049
603
603,668
215,967
-
406
215,561
606,869
32,786
7,287
632,368
2,731
3,452
-
6,183
1,358,726
11,186
7,028
1,362,884
14,271,044
38,721
37,315
14,272,450
16,192,091
20,025
41,591
16,170,525
286,083
-
-
286,083
$39,869.459
$790,513
1:704,061
$39,955.911
VENDOR
CLEA41NG ACCOUNTS
A 0 EL€CTRIC
ABC PLUMBING
ABD TANK E PUMP
ALPS CONSTRUCTION* INC.
ANGEL CONSTRUCTION
AURORA SIGN CO.
HOWARD 3AN
ROBERT BORG CONSTRUCTION
BRENNAN•S SEWER
SkEX-AkLINGTON
LEONARD J. BROWN
JOHN CA(;LE SEWER
PHILIP A. CAMMAR4TA
SUSAN CAVANAUGH
CLASSIC BUILDERS
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
COLUWELL BANKER
DANLEY LUMBER
DEC -OUT
DISBURSEMENT ACCOUNT
DO IT RIGHT ROOTER
W. C. DULANO
DONOHUE G ASSOCIATES# INC.
LEONARD ELLISON
FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF MT. PCO
VILLAGE OF AOUlvT PROSPECT PAGE I
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128190
PURCHASE DESCRIPIIt;:q INVOICE AMJUNT TOTAL
30NO R_FUNO
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND PEFUND
$500.00
$500.00
SONO REFUND
$500.00
$500.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND k;_FUNO
$100.00
30NO REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
530U.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND RLPUNO
5100.00
$100.00
30ND REFUND
$lu0.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
REFUND APPLICATION FEE
$10.00
$10.00
MLLE ST LEASE REIMS
$100.00
SIOL).UO
BONI) REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
PMT P1R L122190
5224.25
$224.25*
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND RErUND
$100.06
$200,00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$25.00
$125.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING
2122190
$3489331.45
{
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING
2122190
$1#334.87
PAYROLL PERIOD ENDING
2122190
$451.33
PAYROLL PERIOC ENDING
.2!22190
529#469.77
$3799587.42*
BOND REFUND
$50.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$20u.UO
BOND REFUND
$75.00
$75.00
SERVICES RENDERED
5961.15
SERVICES RENDERED
S11203.10
SERVICES RENDERED
5374.57
$23538.82
BOND REFUND
$25.00
$25.00
FED }SAY 2115190
$988.48
VILLAGE OF MJU',)T PRGS4ECT PAGE 2
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
?AYMcNT DATE 2128190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTIdf-.: INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
FED FAY 2/15190
$295.42
V,
DUE TO FED DEP PAY
OF 2122
$10,300.93
a
DUE TO r=ED DEP PAY
OF 2122
$102.12
DUE TJ FEU DEP PAY
OF 2/22
$34.53
DUE TO =E; DEP PAY
OF 2122
SZ,Z54.44
DUE Tu FtD DEP PAY
OF 2/22
$632.83
514x808.80#
ISER-2ERNER
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.00
HUBBY GROUP$ INC.
ANNUAL PREMIUM
$3x76$.00
131761.00
ILLINOIS FIRE EXTINGUIrHER CO.
BOND REFUND
$50.00
$50.00
HAK CHUL JIN
30NO REFUND
5500.00
$500.00
ANDREA JUSZCZYK
PMT PIR 2/22190
$254.00
$254.00*
CHING HU KUGHUNG
BOND REFUND
$475.00
$475.00
MCERSMAN G MEERSMAN
REFUND TRF STAMP 2629
3169.04
5169.00
NOkTHNEST HOME SERVICES
BOND RcFLJND
$100.00
$100.00
OLYMPIC SIGNSx INC.
BOND REFUNO
$100.00
$100.00
OPUS
3OtND RtFUNO
1500.00
BOND RE UNO
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$700.00
PARVIN-CLAUS$ SIGN CO.
BOND REFUND
$75.00
BOND RtFUND
$75.00
$150.00
PENSION DISBURSEMENTh
POLICE Pt N DISE FEb
$371315.34
FIRE PEN DISB FEB
$41x591.48
$781906.82$
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$70.00
$70.00*
PHUTO•S HOT DOGS
BOND REFUNO
$100.00
$100.00
PIERCE BUILDERS
BUND REFUND
$10.0u
BONI) R:FUND
$75.00
BOND REFUND
Siu0.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$385.00
PRESIDENT BUILDERS
BOND REFUND
$75.00
E75.00
R E L PLUMBING
BOND RLFUW)
1100.00
$100.00
J. ROSEMEYER
BOND Rr_FUND
$75.00
$75..00
ROYAL FUEL LIQUID ENERGIES INC
FUEL
$131525.39
$131525.39*
SHOBEkG E MEISTEI
60NO RLr- UNAL)
S1u0.00
$100.00
SIGNCRAFTERS
BOND REFUND
$100.00
$100.1$0
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
REINSPrCTION FEE
3[5.00
VENDOR
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
WHITE HEN PANTRY
WILSON INSTALLATIONS
CLEARING ACCOUNTS
VILLAGE Of MOUNT PKOSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPECTION FEE
RFINSPECTION FEE
REINSPECTIJN FEE
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPLCTI-jN FEF
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPECTIJN FEE
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPECTIUN FEE
REINSPEC TION FEE
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPECTION FEE
REINSPE7CTION FEE
SONO Rt#-UND
BOND REFUND
INVOICE AMOUNT
$25.00
$25.00-
$25.00
$25.00
$-5.00
325.00
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
$15.00
525.00
$2 5.00
$2 5.00
$25.00
32 S.OU
$100.00
$35.0;;
***TOTAL**
GENERAL FUND $j51#94r3.67 COMMUNITY DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND $li#z'�9.46 WATER £ SEWER FUND
PARKING SYSTEM REVENUE FUND $535.86 RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
POLICE PENSION FUND $37#315.34 FIREMEN'S PENSION FUND
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND 571028.25
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
PAGE 3
TOTAL
$390.00
5 i 00.00
$35.00
S560#515.50
5i1436.99
$341558.45
$31761.00
5411591.48
THE ART OF PHOTOGRAPHY PHOTOS OF MAYOR $42.00 $42.00
PETTY CASH - FINA;NCE DEPT. MISC EXPENSES T6.48 #
MISC EXPENSES $42.67 $49.15*
SISTER CITIES ASSOCIATION OF MEM3cRSHI P FEE $375.00 5375.00*
VEAIDUR
PUBLIC REPRESENTATION DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE MANAGER#S OFFICE
BURKE AND RYAN
GLASS* HILL* DALLMEYER L kUTH#
HOLY FAMILY HOSPITAL
ICMA
ILLINOIS CITY MANAGEMENT ASSOC
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINA+VCE DEPT.
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
VON BRIESEN AND PURTELL# S.C.
VILLAGE MANAGER#S OFFICE
GENERAL FUND
CABLE TV OPERATI0NS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128!40
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
$4h6.15
PAGE 4
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
###TOTAL#r $466.15
LEGAL SCRVICES-DEC £ JAN
$343.75
$343.75
PROF St, -',VICES -JAN
$4*654.O0
$4#654.00
EMPLOYMENT PHYSICAL
$82.00
$82.00
PUBLICATION
$228.95
$128.95
METRi MGRS LUNCHEON 2116
$15.00)
$15.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$7.0(;
$7.00
MISC EX'ENSES
$44.66
#
MISC EXPENSES
$6.70
#
MISC EXOENSES
$2.72
$94.08#
TRNG• P.TG* SUPPLIES
$13.54
$13.54*
SERVICES RENDERED
$ 441.50
$942.50
***TOTAL**
$b*274.82
$6*274.82
CORTEZ DIXON SD MTG PROD CREW $25.04 $25.00
R.T. JENKINS MAR -APR NEWSLETTER &300.00 $300.00
JOHN KEANE 3D MTG PROD CREW $25.00 $25.00
MT. PROSPECT EMPLOYMENT StRVIC TEMP Sr<VICE-VOGELGESANG $340.00
VENUUR
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
TASCHO SAEMS
WALTER SOSIN
CABLE TV OPERATIONS
GENERAL FUND
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PKOSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYA63LE APPROVAL RcPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/90
PURCHASE OESCRIPTIUN
TEMP SF- VICE-VOGrLUESANG
MISC EXPENSES
B0 PkUJ CREW-MTG 2/13
30 PROD CREW 2/13
$lt200.25
PAGE 5
INVOICE AMOUNT
TUTAL
$390.00
$780.00
$20.25
S2U.25#
$25.00
$25.00
$25.00
525.00
***TOTAL**
$1#200.25,
DAILY HERALD
SUBSCRIPTION
BLAIR BUSINESS SLkVICES, INC.
TEMP SERVICES-TOWNLEY
$225.00
5225.00
DECISION DATA SERVICE INC.
MTCE PRINTER -MARCH
$84.00
$84.00
CHARLES R. HARDY C ASSOCIATES
CONSULTING SERVICES
$500.00
$500.00
DAILY HERALD
SUBSCRIPTION
$132.60
5132.60
PETTY CASH - FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$3.00
#
MISC EXPENSES
$14.44
#
MISC EXPENSES
$2.59
MISC EXPENSES
$13.82
b33.85
PUBLIX OFFICE SUPPLIES INC.
ENVELOPt=S
$5.95
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$57.23
UFFICE SUPPLIES
$36.59
OFFICE SUPPLIES
(17.02
OFFICE iUPPLIES
$88.27
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$65.80
5270.86
SCOTT DECAL COMPANY
LICENSE DECALS
S3, 6b 0. 00
$39660.00
SYSTEMS FORMSt INC.
PURCmASt ORDERS
$1,250.39
RETURN' tNVELOPES
$218.50
$19408.89
XEROX CORP.
MONTHLY CHARGES FOR 1090 COPIER
519239.00
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN - MARCH
$201.39
PURCHASt- OPTION
5504.11
$1,944.50
FINANCE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$9#319.70
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 6
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
GENERAL FUND gd,3L9.70
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE
DAILY HERALD SUBSLPIPTIFIN $132.60 3132.60
NORTHWEST STATIO14ERS INC. OFFICE SUPPLIES $82.93 sdz.93
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC LEGAL A3S $375.36 $375.3:
VILLAGE CLERK'S OFFICE ***TOTAL** $590.89
GENERAL FUND
RISK MANAGEMENT
$590.89
BROOKFIELD
EXCFSS LOSS PREM -JAN
$7,012.24
ADMIN FEES -FEB
$3,458.65
EXCESS LOSS PREM FEB
$7,012.24
MED CLAIMS THRU 2/15/90
S13v96L.41
#
MED CLAIMS THRU 2/22
$229584.94
MED CLAIMS THRU 2/23
$608.35
554,637.83.
ROBERT CLARK
PRESCRIPTION REIMS
$14.46
X8.4.46
HMO ILLINOIS
HLTH INS -MARCH 90
$7,049.11
$7,U49.11
HOB3S GROUP, INC.
ANNUAL PREMIUM
$19880.00
$19880.00
ILLINOIS DIRECTOR OF EMPL SEC.
BENEFITS PAID
$561.00
$561.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
SERVICES RENDERED
$156.06
$156.00#
POSTMASTER
POSTAGE-HLTH MAGS
$45.09
$45.09#
RISK MANAGEMENT
#r#TOTAL**
$64053.49
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE T
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND Sbrt:353.47
INSPECTION SERVICES
WILLIAM L. AMUNDSEN
B L H INDUSTRIES
CREST COMPUTER SJPPLY
FAIRVIEW PRINTING SERVICE
DAILY HERALD
ILLINOIS ENVIR. HEALTH ASSOC.
NAT *L. CERTIFICATION PROGRAM
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
PETTY CASH - FINANCE jEPT.
THOMPSON ELEVATOR INSPECTION S
XERUX CORP,
INSPECTION SERVICES
GENERAL FUND
EXPf_tiSES
52t)5.00
$265.00
KRUY DIALO TAPE
SIBZ.05
$182.05
COMPUTE', RISER
$34.51
$34.51
:3LOG APPLICATION FORMS
$493.00
Stt93.00
SUBSCRIPIION
5132.60
$132.60
SEMINAR-RCELSs KKUPA
$30.00
$30.00
REGISTRATION - FRONTZAK
$50.00
$50.00
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$103.4+
$103.44
MSC EXPENSES
$10.13
$10.18#
ELEV INSPECTION
St5.00
$25.00
MONTHLY EQUITY PLAN - MARCH
$201.38 .
PUkCHA-- OPTION
$504.10
$705.48
***TOTAL**
fZvj31.Z6
62P031.Zb
t
POLICE DEPARTMENT
DAVID BEHUN
EXPENSES
$6.00
$6.00
BOWMAN DISTRIBUTION CENTER
MISC AUTO PARTS -JAN
$126.88
$126.88
BRAND OFFICE EQUIPMENT SALES
OFFICE EQUIP
$135.00
$135.00
CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY
AO-r:JLICE OFFICERS
3585.00
5585.00
COMMONWEALTH EDISJN
3H66 -JT -5422-A
$51.27
$51.27
CURTIS 1000 INCORPORATED
ENVELOPES
560.00
560.00
EMG ASSOCIATES
SUPPLIES
$203.00
$203.00
THE FILE MART
OFFICE SUPPLIES
5241.50
$241.50
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 8
ACCOUNTS PAYABLc APPROVAL RtPORT
Pt,YMENT MATE 2128190
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICE DEPARTMENT
RGSERT ;,I3SUN
EXPENSL-
$31.12
S31.I2
TED GGRSKI
CXP,NSES
$40.25
540.25
THE HERALD
A!3-P,11ROL OFFIC=icS
5481.60
AD-PATR''L OFFICERS
$240.80
$722.40
ICMA
REFERENCE MATERIAL
$25.90
525.40
ILLINOIS FjCLL TELLPHUNE CO.
750 '-t 1`� 6
$134.30
$134.3:
INTERNATIONAL ASSN. OF CHIEFS
TRAlNIN, KEYS
'5350.00
$350.00'
KALE UNIFORMS
U N I F _?RMS
S II2.70
CLOTHING SUPPLIES
$51.00
CLJTHIN,- SUPPLIES
$120.40
CLOTHINc-1 SUPPLIES
$4.53
CLOTHING SUPPLIES
$45.50
5339.13
LION PHOTO OF SCHAUMBURG
SUPPLI}L:)
$640.78
SUPPLIES
$70.80
$711.58
LUKL BUSINESS PRODUCTS & OFFIC
FILE CA3INETS
$554.00
SUPPLIES
$22.10
SUPPLIES
$45.78
SUPPLIES
$45.50
SUPPLIES
$45.50
SUPPLIES
$45.50
$758.48
MAACU
PAINT I-19
$385.00
$385.00
.JOE MITCHELL 3UICKe INC.
TACTICAL UNIT CAR MENTAL
SIUO.00
$100.00
MURAN EQUIPMENT CORP.
EQUIPMENT
$37.99-
EQUIPMcNT
5379.34
$341.3`_
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE WEST
REPAIR PARTS
$35.00
$35.00
MOUNT PROSPLLT POLICE EXPLOR;R
DONAT1U4
$21000.00
$2,000.00
NAPA AUTO PARTS
MISC AUTO PARTS
$247.47
$247.47
EDWARD ,NASTEK
DEPARTMENT PHOTOS
'450.O0
$450.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
ANNUAL EMP PHYSICALS
52070.0(0
$29070.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$I1i
$10.32
RAY J•HERRON CO.* INC.
REMIN41fiN SHOTGUNS
$$14.34
PETTY CASH - POLICE DEFT.
MISC EX"LENSES
MISCEX✓cNSES
51.60
a
MISC EAP E,JSES
$71.12
t
MISC EXPENSES
$1.60
a
MISC EXPENSES
$12.24
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PAGE 9
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2!28%90
VENDOR
PURCHASE DESCRIPTIO:
INVOICE AMOUNT
TOTAL
POLICt DEPARTMENT
MISC Et'ENSES
$6.00
#
MISC EX?ENSES
$6.50
#
MISC EXPEN' ES
$19.00
#
MISC EXt'tNSES
$13.90
$164.21#
PROSPECT BOARUING KENNEL
STRAYS-JAN 9J
$252.00
$252.00
ROBERT RIORDAN
EXPtNSE',-i
$6.00
$6.00--
SAVE-A-PET
STRAYS-JAN 90
$105.00
$105.0{!\
SCOTT SULLIVANT
EXPENSES
$40.25
EXPENSES
$45.38
$95.63
RICHARO TRACY
EXPENSES
$30.00
$30.00
ThE TRAFFIC INSTITUTE
TUITION-SALATINO. GIBSON
$700.00
$700.00
VILLAGE OF ELK GROVE VILLAGE
TUITIUN-TRACY, SULLIVAN
$50.00
$50.00#
ALLEN WILCOX
EXPENSES
$6.00
$6.00
POLICE DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$12,174.13
GENERAL FUND
$12,1T4.i3
FIRE E EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
AMERITECH MOBILE COMMUNICATION
SERVICE-FEB
$30.09
$30.09
RITA BARSELLA
FIREFIGHTER, VISION TEST
$60.00
$60.00#
NATALIE CHALMERS
FIREFIGHTER VISION TEST
$b0.00
$60.00#
CHICAGO LOMMUNICATION SERVICE,
REPAIR SERVICE
$450.56
COMMUNICATION SERVICES
$169.50
$630.06
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
ANNUAL MENTAL
$37.20
$37.20
COMPUTtRLANO
COMPUTtt SUPPLIES
$51.50
COMPUTE? SUPPLIES
3,+0.00
$91.50
CRYSTAL CATLRING* INC.
LUNL'IEON
$109.35
$109.35
HENRY DAwSON
EXPtNSEl-
350.00
$50.00
GALL'S, INC.
SUPPLIES
$15.34
SUPPLIES
$199.99
$215.33
VILLAGE OF MuU�iT PROSPECT
PAGE 10
ACCOUNTS PAY43LE APPROVAL REPORT
PaYMENT GATE 2/28/90
VENDJR
PURCHASE DE�,CRIPTI?JN
INVOICL AMUUNT
TOTAL
FIRE F. EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL BINDING CORPORATION
ANNUAL REPJRT
51343.44
$130.99
SHARON GORSKI
FIKL FIGHTER VISION TcST
$60.00
$60.00*
H R MART PHOTO
SUPPLILS
SIOT.68
$107.68
HARPER COLLEGE
TUITION-FLAVIN
8155.00
TUITION-MILLER
$155.00
TUITI'JN-HUNT
$155.00
$465.00
IGE9 INCORPURATED
)XYGEN
$18.00
$13.00
ILLINOIS 6ELL TELr-PHONE CO.
575 9 li U
1411.63
244 9 1'S G
$25.96
244 9 1`� G
$20.74
$458.38
ILLINOIS FIRE INSPECTJRS ASSN.
REGTSTRATIJN-FPO I
8500.06
SMOKE O=TECTORS
530.00
$536.00
BRIAN IPSEN
F1LFGUA=.D LXTENOED EDITION
5129.OG
EXPENScS-SOCA
$163.70
$292.70
KALI UNIFORMS
UNIFORM SUPPLIES
$113.00
$113.00
JAMES KEADY
WASHt_R F. DRYER-STA 14
$100.040
$100.00
LISA KRZYSKO
CLE'.ICAL HELP 2/24
$65.00
$65.00
LUKL 6USINESS PRJUUCTS E OFFIC
SUPPLI'-5
$360.00
$360.00
MOTURULA CELLULAR SERVICE I,vC
CELLULAR SERV FE6 90
$30.11
$30.11
NORTHEASTCRN ILLINOIS FIRE
MEM6cRSttIP-ULREICHv LAVELL41
$50.00
$50.00
NORTHEASTERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSI
EVALUATIONS
$590.00
$590.00
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
J VISITS JAN 90
3142.17
$142.17
NORTHWEST COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
PARAMEDIC CLASS 4 STUDENTS
%2.260.00
$29200.00
NORTHWEST ELECTRICAL SUPPLY
SUPPLIES
$60.64
$60.6C
NORTHWEST POLICE ACADEMY
RFGI',TRATI'JN-ULRcI:H9 DUMOVICH
5110.0i!
$110.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
JFFILE SUPPLIES
$28.72
OFFICE SUPPLIES
547.01
OFFICE 'SUPPLIES
$24.38
$100.11
PAGE AMERICA
SERVICE
$44.13
SERVICE
$39.30
SERVICE
529.48
$117.91
KAREN PEDERSEN
FIR_FIGHTER VISIJN TEST
$60.00
$6J.00x
PETTY CASH - FIRE DEPT.
TRNG9 "fGv SUPPLIES
$9.66
�
TRAGr MTG v SUPPLIES
52U.95
TRNG* Mf G9 SUPPLIES
$128.40
TRNG9 MI G9 SUPPLIES
$25.86
VENOJR
FIRE L EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
PRIORITY SYSTEMS INCORPORATED
PROSPECT DIVE SHOP
QUALEXs INC.
SPORTS 11
SULLIVAN PRESS
WALGREENS
FIRE S EMERGENCY PROTECTION DEPT.
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 11
ACCQUNT,� PAYABLE APPRJVAL REPORT
P,AYMENT DATE 2128190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOU%T TOTAL
TRNG9 !".TG9 SUPPLIES
$14.37
a
TRNGv !TG9 SUPPLILS
$46.27
$245.01#
SERVICES RENDERE7
$675.00
$675.00
SC0F3A T,' N K S
$260.00
$260.00
SUPPLI`S
$18.22
$18.22
JACKETS
$191.40
JACKtl,-,
$111.40
$382.81
JUS LA4:3S D ENVELOPES
$178.70
BUS CAKJS
$139.00
$357.70
BATTERIES
$116.74
$116.74
***TOTAL**
$91511.b5
4v91'3I.b5 CAPITAL IMPRV.
5 REPL. FUND
$360.00
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE
NORTHWEST CENTRAL DISPATCH SYS SERVICES RENDERED $319385.00 $31*385.00
CENTRAL DISPATCH SERVICE ***TOTAL** $319385.00
GENERAL FUND
$3193,35.00
, ******1.*** c: * ********##
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
BUSSE HARDWARE 41SC HOW SUPPLIES $10.45 $10.45
NORTHWEST STATIONERS I",1C. OFFIuE ,UPPLIES $37.05 $37.06
VENUOR
HUMAN SERVICES 'DIVISION
SHELTERv INC.
HUMAN SERVICES DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
V'ILLAGL JF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
P.kYMENT DATE 2/28/40
PURCHASE JESCRIPTION
dUDGIET ALLJC-4TH PPT
$ZVIT2.71
xc**#-:,4c*** *** 4*4**************g#**4.*4****#*v****4*******#*4v�#�1k#�
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
PAGE I
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
52tI25.00 $21125.00
***TOTAL** $2ri72.51
AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION
DUES—FRITZ
8144.,00
31.4
EVANS RESTAURANT
STetATEGIC PLNG MTG 2/10
584.55
584.
MOUNT PROSPECT CHAMBER OF COMM
CONSUMER EXPO 60]THS
$420.00
$420.00
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE SUPPLIES
$131.74
bi3i.74
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS INC
LEGAL ADS
$L1.93
$21.43
PETTY CASH — FINANCE DEPT.
MISC EXPENSES
$46.60
$46.604
QUALEX• INC.
FILM 6 DEVELOPING
$Z6.56
FILM E DEVELOPING
$3.87
FILM 6 .DEVELOPING
$14.65
$45.30
SUBURBAN PRIMARY HEALTH CARE C
SERViC=> RENUERED
$2,266.66
$29266.66
VANS ARTISTS UESIGNERS SUPPLIE
SUPPLIE13
$49.64
$49.64
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
***TOTAL**
$3e210.42
GENERAL FUND
COMMUNITY
DEVLPMT BLOCK GRANT
$21335.19
aa-ozu*r***m;ra***q*************v****;*#**Vl******Q:rrvY��#��4���a##�xc*aa��a#mark#4#Z�#Y�#ik#kik�t�#�stt
STREET DIVISION
A STAR AND STRIPES FLAG Ct. VILLAGE FLAGS $1*Z64.40 $1,#264.40
VENOUR
STREET DIVISION
AETNA TRUCK PARTS
AKZO SALT INC.
ALLIED ASPHALT PAVING
AM -LIN PRODUCTS• INC.
AMERICAN ARBORIST SUPPLIES9 IN
AMERICAN PUBLIC WORKS ASSOCIAT
B S H INDUSTRIES
MELVYN BOTH
BOWMAN DISTRI6UTIUN CENTER
BRISTOL HOSE f FITTING
BUREAU OF BUSINESS PRACTICE
BUSSE HARDWARE
R. 1. BUSSE INC.
CASH EXPRESS9 INC.
CITIZENS UTILITIES CO. OF ILLI
ARTHUR CLESEN9 INC.
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
COMM)DORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
CONRAD AND SON
R. L. CORTY C COMPANY
COURTESY HOME CENTER
THOMAS CRAMER
DES PLAINES CHRYSLER
E C E HAULING* INC.
E -Z REPAIR
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVILE IN
FLEET MAINTENANCE CONSULT.INC.
FOREST TREE SERVICE: INC.
DAVE GUZZARDO
VILLAGE OF MJUNT PROSPECT PAGE 13
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVCICL AMOUNT TOTAL
PARTS
S43.90
543.90
ROAD SALT
$69600.27
$61600.27
COLD PATCH
$5446.38
$546.38
PARTS
556.86
356.136
SUPPLI>,
$124.36
SUPPLIES
$78.91
$203.77
REuISTRKTION-80Tl
$180.00
$180.00,
SUPPLIES
$8.32
$8.32
REIMB-CLOTHING ALLOW
$74.23
$74.23
MISC AUTO PARTS -JAN
$19590.76
519590.76
SUPPLIES
$70.65
870.65
SUPPLIES
566.60
$66.60
MISC HDv SUPPLIES
$21.52
MISC HOW SUPPLIES
$14.98
MISC HOW SUPPLIES
$2.55
$39005
CONCRLT= DUMPING
$10.00
$10.00
PAINT REMOVER
$200.00
$200.00
WATEx SERVICE
$78.88
$78.88
SUPPLIES
$95.00
$95.00
UNIFURM SERVICE
$76.57
UNIFURM SERVICE
$15.39
UNIFORM SERVICE
$73.71
UNIFOR"1 SERVICE
$16.98
$182.65,
CLEANIN'> SERVICE
$19636.00
$19836.0!x,
BF80-JT-17006
$211.57
$211.57
MISC EQUIPTU DIVIDE2S
$148.29
$148.29
SERVICES RENDERED
$80.00
$80.00
SUPPLI'S
519.46
$19.46
SNOW REMOVAL
$130.00
$130.00
PARTS
$59.20
$59.20
DUMPING CHARGE
$226.00
$226.00
REPAIRS
$386.00
5388.00*
TIRE REPAIR SERVICE
$63.00
$63.00
FACILITY MTCE PROGRAM
$19976.20
$19976.20
PKWY TREE TRIMMING
$29339.66
$29339.66
CONTRACT SNOW REMOVAL
$76.50
$76.50
VENOJR
STREET DIVISION
HAMMtk'S PLASTIC RECYCL. CORP.
JOHN HANStN
I. M. CORPORATIOiN
IBT• INC.
MIKE JOHNSON
JUST FAUCETS
JIM KANE
J.C. LICHT COMPANY
MIKE MATIJEVIS
MEYERMATERIAL C).
NAPA AUTO PARTS
NORTHWEST STATI04LRS INC.
KEVIN O•NEAL
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
POLLARD MOTOR COMPANY
PROFESSIONAL SERVICE LNDUSTRIE
ROADWAY SIGNAL AND LIGHTING MA
ANTHONY SACCO
SCHMEkLER FORD INC.
SCHUSTER EQUIPMENT COMPANY
AL SCHWANOT
AUDREY-iLHWEIGt-R
STEINER ELECTRIC
TECH SYN CORPORATION
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
PETER VANDEN BRADEN
VERMEtR-ILLINOIS
WARNING LITES OF ILLINOIS
VILLAGE OF MJUNT Pf<0SPECT
ACLOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2It8190
PURLHASE DESCRIPTION
INVCICE AMOUNT
CAR STuPS
'64:14.13
CONTkACT S,4OW REMOVAL
s,,,,5.00
MTCF AGRcEMENT
$74.84
PARTS
$ 1€?5.Z8
CONTkALT SNOB REMOVAL
$80.00
SUPPLIES
$51.68
COf4TRACT SNOW REMOVAL
$105.00
PA INTIjVt: SUPPLIES
$151.65
PAINT
$20.35
PAINTING SUPPLIES
511.70 -
SNOW R+EmOVAL
$127.50
SUPPLIES
$109.14
MISC AUTO PARTS
E398.49
MISC AUTO PARTS
S2,.j�4T
UFFILE >UPPLIES
5'. '.4+3
2/15, 24 SNOW REMOVAL
$200.50
TRAVEL F SUPPLIES
$26.36
TRAVEL u SUPPLIES
$10.71
TRAVEL F. SUPPLI_S
$2.66
TRAVEL G SUPPLIES
ST.Z8
TRAVEL F EXPENSES
$1.00
TRAVEL EXPENSES
$112.57
PARTS
$41.68
FINAL PMT - MATERIAL TLSTING
$4eC51.3a
TRAFFIC SIGNALS
5334.90
SNOW REMOVAL
S90.0i
PA:,; .
$53.44
EQUiPME'IT
x102.72
SAFETY SHOES
550.00
CONTRACT SP40W REMOVAL
$62.50
REPLACEMENT 3ULBS
$89.74
SUPPLIES
$137.00
SWITCH
$ 5.47
CONTkACT SNOW REMOVAL
SdT.50
TEETH PdCKETS E 3OLTS
$685.95
SUPPLIES
5243.00
PAGE 14
Ti.}T AL
$404.I3
$65.00
ST4.69
5185.28
$80.00
$51.68
$105.00
$160.30
5127.50
S1U9.14
$045.46
$82.40
$202.50
s
5162.58z
$41.68
$4*051.3E
$334.90
$90.00
$53.44
$102.72
$50.00
562.50
589.74
4137.00
$5.47
$87.50
5685.95
VILLAGE JF ,mUUNT PROSPECT PAGE 15
ACCOUNT:i PAYABL4: APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2128/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL.
STREET DIVISION
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ARLIPGTON HTS CAMERA
BOWMAN DISTRI¢3UTION CENTER
R. I. BUSSE INC.
CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
THE ECONOMICS PRESS INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FREORIKSEN E SONS
GREELEY AND HANSEN
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
FILM L PROCESSING
SUP+ -LIES
$832.00
$19075.00
WEIL PUMP COMPANY
PARTa
$181.65
$181.65
HOWARD L. WHITE L ASSOCIATES*
SUPx'L1_''
$lv407.68
$19407.68
WINKELMANS RAUTATJR CO.
REPAIR KADIATOR
$45.00
$45.00
ZARNOTH BRUSH WURKS9 INC.
SUPPLIES
$306.00
S30i.00
STREET DIVISION
UNIFORM SERVICE
###TGTAL#x:
$309129.51
GENERAL FUND
5229971.09
MOTOR. FUEL TAX FUND
$69435.17
CAPITAL IMPAV. L REPL. FUND
$243.29
BJ80-JI-23598
$69584.20
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
ARLIPGTON HTS CAMERA
BOWMAN DISTRI¢3UTION CENTER
R. I. BUSSE INC.
CHICAGO TRIBUNE COMPANY
CLS UNIFORM RENTALS
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
EARNIES TIRE REPAIR SERVICE IN
THE ECONOMICS PRESS INC.
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORP
FREORIKSEN E SONS
GREELEY AND HANSEN
H -B -K WATER METER SERVICE
FILM L PROCESSING
$212.04
$212.04
MISC AUTO PARTS -JAN
5919.97
Ml SC AUTO PARTS -JAN
$358.78
$19278.75
DUMPING OF CONCRETL
$10.00
DUMPING OF CONCRETE
$10.00
$20.00
NOTICE FOR STORM SEWER HID
$518.02
$518.02
UNIFORM SERVICE
$76.57
UNIFORM SERVICE
$15.39
UNIFORM SERVICE
573.71
UNIFORM SERVICE
$16.98
$182.65
BJ80-JI-23598
$69584.20
$69584.20
BH67-JT-1310-A
$51.10
$51.10
TIRE RtI'AIR SERVICE
$63.00
$b3.00
SUBSCRIPTIONS
$30.63
$30.63
OVERNIGHT JOX
$41.SU
$41.50
EXTINGUISHES SERV
$20.00
$20.00
ENGINEERINv SERVICES
$49054.95
$49054.95
WATEk SE�2VICE
$446.94
WATE4 SERVICE
$206.28
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 16
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
P,hYMCNT DATE 2/28/90
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION, INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
MATER S_-RVICE
$137.52
WATEk 'SERVICE
2584.46
WATER SERVICE
$515.70
SI*890.90
HILT19 INC.
DRILL
$748.06
/748.00
I.S.M. CORPORATION
MTCE AGKEEME.YT
$74.88
574.88
ILLINOIS BELL TELEPHONE CO.
153 `) .1'= G
$16.94
575 9 15 G
$17.16
303 9 3G S
SZZ.65
338 9 15 G
$17.48
155 9 15 G
$17.76
$91.99
MIKE KAISER
SAFETY SHOES
$50.00
$510.00
LAND AND LAKES CO
DUMPING AT WHEELING
$282.50
DUMPING AT WHEELING
$922.50
$11205.00
ROGER MEYER
DUMPING L HAULING CHCS
$782.00
DUMPING L HAULING CHGS
5720.35
51,502.35
MORTON GROVE AUTOMOTIVE NEST
REPAIR PARTS
575.00
REPAIR PARTS
$75.00
REPAIR FARTS
$75.00
5225.00
MOTOROLA CELLULAR SERVICE INC
CELLULAR SVC -JAN 90
$32.57
$32.57
NAPA AUTO PARTS
MISC AUTO PARTS
1441.12
$941.12
NET MIOWESTs INC.
WATER SAMPLES -JAN 90
$176.80
$176.80
NORTHERN ILLINOIS GAS CO.
1818-1/2 BONITA UR
$190.60
117 N WAVERLY
$126.83
14S KENSINGTOsN 1 E RAND
$97.89
112 E HIGHLAND AVE
$269.74
$665.06
NORTHWEST STATIONERS INC.
OFFICE :iUPPLIES
572.38
$72.38
PADDOCK PUBLICATIONS
AD -PUBLIC WKS
$416.10
$416.10
PETTY CASH - PUBLIC WORKS
TRAV=L E SUPPLIES
58.75
TRAV-L L SUPPLIES
54U.00
TRAV L L SUPPLIES
$3.46
s
TRAVtL L SUPPLIES
$1.00
TRAVLL L SUPPLIES
$84.00
$
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$25.00
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$12.42
TRAVEL L EXPENSES
$7.01
TRAVEL L EXPENSES
SZ1.19
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 17
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28190
VENDOR PURCHASE DESCRIPTION INVCICE AMOUNT TOTAL
WATER AND SEWcR DIVISION
WATER L SEW -ER FUND
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
$229405.95
COMMOUORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
TRAVEL E EXPENSES
$11.32
$215.25*
POLISH DAILY LGOOA
AD -MECHANIC P 'W
$319.20
1319.20
POSTMASTER
POSTA€:t-WATER BILLS
56513.10
$658.10#
RAIN60W 1 HR PHOTO EXP.
FILM Px3CESSING
$9.59
$9.59
SOUND INCORPJRATED
KEYS
$18.00
118.00
TRI STATE ELECTRONIC CORPORATI
BATTtRY
$16.76
$16.76
WATER AND SEWER DIVISION
CAR STOPS
***TOTAL**
$22v4U5.95
WATER L SEW -ER FUND
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
$229405.95
COMMOUORE MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS
CLEANIN'o SERVICE
$140.00
$140.00
COMMONWEALTH EDISON
bHa6-JT-0496-A
$21.42
BH66-JT-3710-A
$8.57
BH65-JT-5262-A
$196.38
iHo6-JT- 5266-C
$134.81
iH68-JT-7498-A
$21.42
$382.60
HAMMEK # S PLASTIC RECYCL. LORP.
CAR STOPS
680.00
$80.OQ
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
19 E NO!'THWEST HWY
SI2.50
$12.50
PARKING SYSTEM DIVISION
***TOTAL**
$615.10
PARKING SYSTEM RtVENUE FUND
8115./0
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
THE DARWILL PRESS cNVELi_)Pd:. S $330400 $330.00
VENDOR
REFUSE DISPOSAL 3IVISION
SEVENTEEN SPECIALTIES INC.
REFUSE DISPOSAL DIVISION
GENERAL FUND
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACLUJNT`, PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28190
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
RECYLLL PrctiU SUPPLIrS
$538.31
INVOICE AMOUNT TOTAL
$2�- ls. 31 5258.31
#r#TOTAL#Y 5588.31
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS
nURKE AND RYAN LEGAL SERVICES -DEC E JAN $406.25 $406.Z5
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS ***TOTAL** 5406.25
DOWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST 1985 $436.25
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES
COMMONWtALTH EDISON BGdI-JT-1838-A $75.81
8H67 -JT -j858 -B $17.69 $93.50
FOLDERS FLAG & OECORATINGv INC REPAIR 3ANNERS $324.90 5324.90
COMMUNITY AND CIVIC SERVICES ###TEN€AL## $418.40
GENERAL FUND 541 6.1to
VENOUR
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
FLOOD LOAN 3 E I
ALL DEPARTMENTS TOTAL
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE APPROVAL REPORT
PAYMENT DATE 2/28/90
PURCHASE DESCRIPTION
FLODL) LOAN INTER,r_ST FEB & MAR
FLOOD LOAN PRINCIPAL FEB L MAR
INVOICE AMUUNT
Sit 534. 72
S5-#702.74
***TOTAL**
PAGE 19
TOTAL
S7vZaT-46*
$7vZ87.46
S704v061.79
DATE RUN 2128190
VILLAGt (.IF ;MOUNT PROSPECT PAGE 20
TIME RUN 12.32.45
ACC JUNT`; PAYABLE APPROVAL
LISTING Iii-APPBAR
SUMMARY OY FUNJ 2129140
NO.
FUND NAME
AMOUNT
I
GENtkAL FUNQ
$461v553.0o
22
MOTOR FUEL TAX FUND
$68435.17
23
COMMUNITY L,,tVLMT 3LOCK GRANT
$39772.15
24
ILL. MUNICIPAL RETIREMENT FUND
$lIt239.46
41
WATCR L SEkck rUNJ
$5699,-o4.40
46
PARKI:`NG SYSTF'1 REVENUE FUND
Slv2;)0.96
44
RISK MANAGEMENT FUND
$1)£1114.49
51
CAPITAL IMPRV. L REPL. FUND
86U3.29
55
DUWNTOWN REDEVLPMT CONST i985
$406.25
71
POLICE PENSION FUND
$379315.34
72
FIREMEN'S PcNSIuN FUND
$419591.48
74
ESCROW DEPOSIT FUND
$79029.25
95
FLOOD LUAN is L I
$74237.40
TOTAL ALL FUNDS STU4t061.79
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 13 OF THE
VILLAGE CODE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECDON ONE That Subsection A of Section 13, 107 of Chapter 13 of the Village
Code of Mount Prospect, as amended, be and the same is hereby further amended by
increasing the number of Class "W" liquor licenses by one (1) (Mickey's Diner, Two West
Busse Avenue), so that hereafter said Subsection A of Section 13.107 of Chapter 13
shall be and read as follows:
Section 13.107. N�p Licenses:
Three (3)
Class A Licenses
Two (2)
Class B Licenses
Ten (10)
Class C Licenses
One (1)
Class D License
Two (2)
Class E Licenses
One (1)
Class G License
One (1)
Class H License
One (1)
Class M License
Two (2)
Class P Licenses
Fifteen (15)
Class R Licenses
Eleven (11)
Class S Licenses
One (1)
Class T License
Eight (8)
Class W Licenses
SECTION TWO: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after
its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
F.11 3-10vil
PASSED and APPROVED this
ATTEST:
Village Clerk
day of , 1990.
Village President
Class
Establishment
Number
A
McBride's; Midwest Liquors; Mrs. P & Me
3
B
Snuggery Pub; Ye Olde Town Inn
2
C
Bolzano Liquors; Dominick's (83 & Golf);
Foremost Liquors; Gold Eagle Liquors; The
Liquor Shoppe; Mt. Prospect Liquors: Osco,
Drugs; Phar -Mor; Walgreens (83 and Golf);
Walgreens (Mt. Prospect Plaza)
10
D
Prospect Moose Lodge
1
E
Bristol Court Banquet Hall; Mr. Peter's
Banquet Hall
2
G
Mount Prospect Park District -Golf Course
1
H
Zanie's
1
M
Holiday Inn
1
P
Arlington Club Beverage; Shimada Shoten
2
R
Artemis; DJB Brunetti; Edwardo's; Fellini;
Giordano's; Golden Nugget; House of Szechwan;
Izakaya Sankyu; Little America; Pepe's;
Sakura; Shin Jung; Sunrise; Torishin;
Yasuke
15
S
Carlisle; Charlie Club; El Sombrero; Evans;
Jake's Pizza; Kampai; Old Orchard -Greenview;
O'Neil's Sports Cafe; Reunion; Sam's Place;
Second Dynasty
11
T
Thunderbird lanes
1
W
M_ickg.)s Diner: Pete's Sandwich Palace;
Photo's Hot Dogs; Pizza Hut (Algonquin Rd);
Pizza Hut (Euclid); Rosati's Pizza; Sizzler's;
Wag's
8
58
Village of" cunt Prospect A00., %aa
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: FILES
FROM: Engineering coordinator
DATE: February 20, 1990
SUBJECT: Pate's Subdivision Offsite
Meeting held at Village Hall (2/14/90)
Attended by: John Fulton Dixon - Village Manager
Dave Clements - Director of P & Z
Bob Pszanka - Eng. Coordinator
Jim Meyer - M.B. Meyer & Assoc.
(Engr. for Developer - Helen Pate)
Note: Lots referred to in Meeting -
Lot 1 - S.W. corner of Westgate & Wildwood
(306 N. Westgate)
Lot 2 - Reese's Subdivision (1221 Wildwood)
Lot 3 - 1219 Wildwood
Lot 4 - Unimproved lot west of Lots
1.) Widening of Wildwood Ln., East of Pate's Subdivision (Frontage
of Lots 1, 2, & 3).
Pavement width shall be 231 back to back of curb.
Developer's Engineer's Estimate for 382 L.F. = $38;964.00
C. Bencic's Village Estimate was 300 L.F. $29,053.00
Prorating C. Bencic's Estimate to 382 L.F. $37,000.00
Add to C. Bencic's estimate, a storm sewer at west end of
Lot 1 = $2,000.
Village cost would be $39,000. Note: figure does not
include engineering cost. Possible 10-15% or $3,900 -
$5,850.
A deduction to the Village's cost for Wildwood Ln. was to be
made by the Developer. The deduction was for the following
items: 1.) Elimination of one street light on offsite
Wildwood Ln. 2.) Shortening of pavement width from 291 B -B
to 231 B -B. In previous discussions, the figure of $6,500
was used. This figure was determined as follows: 1.) $3,500
for the street light 2.) $3,000 for pavement width
reduction. Per the Developer's Engineer, the $3,000 figure
was calculated by:
382 L.F. x (231-31) = 7,640 S.F. of pavement
Total cost = $38,964.00
Page 2
Cost per sq.ft. of pavement = $5.10
Frontage of Lot 7 of Pate's Sub1n on Wildwood is 93.00
Reduction Amount - 93.01 x (291 - 231) X $5.10
$2,845.80 rounded off to $3,000.
The Village feels that these two figures should be:
1.) $5,000 for street light, based on figure normally
used for Deed Covenants for street lighting. Actual cost
could be same as Developer's contract cost for installing
one street light in cul-de-sac.
2.) Pavement reduction figure should include offsite
"Lot 4"! This increase would make this figure:
(93.01 + 127.0) x (291- 231) x $5.10 = $6,732 or rounded
off to $6,800.
Total of 1.) & 2.) would be $11,800. Final figure would be
determined from actual contract costs.
2.) Street Improvement Recapture:
Because Pate's Subdivision's "contribution" includes
improvements to the frontage of "Lot 411, a recapture of
this cost will be allowed to Helen Pate. The Developer
of "Lot 40 shall be required to pay Helen Pate, the
Developer of Pate's Subdivision, for street improvements
across its frontage based on a 291 back to back Width.
The recapture will be based on the same principle as
described in Pate's "contribution" to the Village. The
approximate amount would be 127.01 x 291 x $5.10 =
410—, Irr. Note: the street light cost would not be
included.
3.) Items waived by Village (offsite only)
A.) Permit Fees: 2 1/2% of total cost for review &
inspection waived. The Performance Letter of Credit
Guarantee was not waived.
B.) Pavement width shall be 231 B -B, in lieu of 291 B -B.
C.) One street light on offsite Wildwood Ln. was waived.
Street light in cul-de-sac is still required.
4.) Items to be paid for or installed by Village
Note: No cost figures were mentioned for these items.
A.) Public Sidewalk: Southside only, across frontage of Lots
2, 3, & 4.
B.) Landscaping: Sod restoration of south parkway. Parkway
trees in south parkway. Trees might not be required
along Lots 2, 3, & 4, due to mature trees along right-
of-way line. Verify with Village Forester.
I
I Page 3
C.) Sanitary Services: Six services, two each for Lots 2,
3, & 4, from sewer on Opus' property. Cost would include
fence and grass restoration.
D.) Cost Overruns: Not agreed to by Manager! Dependent on
nature of cost.
5.) Water Main Recapture
Main must be "looped" for Pate's Subdivision. Offsite main
Must be extended across frontage of Lots 1, 2, 3, & 4 to
Westgate Rd. Developer's Engineer had based his estimate on
offsite cost only.
Per Agreement at this Meeting, cost would be shared by lo
"Lots" for total water main cost from Cardinal Lane to
Westgate Road. The 10 "Lots" are Lots 1, 2, 31 6, & 7 of
Pate's Subdivision, two "Lots" for "Lot 4", one "Lot" for "Lot
311, and two "Lots" for "Lot 211.
Final recapture cost would be based on "As -Built" contract
cost. Main would be installed by Developer's contractor.
\Vi-llage must review and approve contract, prior to
construction.
Main would consist of approximately 1100 L.F. of 811 D.I.W.M,
Class 56. One pressure connection at each end. One 811 line
valve. Three hydrants. Cardinal Lane would be open -cut at
crossing. A one -inch copper service and box would be
installed in parkway for -each of the 10 "Lots".
Estimate of cost by B. Pszanka (see attached), including
engineering would be $75,000.
NOTE: Service to Lots 4 & 5 of Pate's Subdivision will not
be included in this cost.
Bob
BP/m
3
-s4u9maaTnb9a
bUTAPd TTV 499M TTvqs Ovs 9P Tno OLIJ -9UPrI POOmPTTM
uo (,EZ) 499; 90 q4PTM 4U9UI9APd 4TuLied ol
!(,OZT) 49a3 A4uam4 peapunq auo uP144
Ss9T 04 L PUP 9 'C 'Z s4OrI UO q4PTm 40T uinUITUTM 9XI4 aonpaa os c
,(,00/)
49a3 p9apunq U9AaS go q4bu9T ovs ap Ino paseaaouT UP 4Tmiad os z
'S9914
AvmXapd iog M001 -4U9TOT33ns m0-1TP TTTm T40TXIM IoPs ep Inc)
9q4 uO sXTPmaPTS aOJ 4uam9aTrLbaj aqq aqguT.MTTa 4TUL29d oLL 'T
:smollo; se A4aadoad 4oalqns axI4 oq OT aa4dPq0) apoo 4u9uidoT9A9G
9qq U10a; SUOT4POT3TPOm 4uvab Aqaa9q OP 4oadsoad qunow go 9bvTTTA
.alq-4 go sqq4s�nai 'jo pavoz PUP qu9PT99-ld 914-4 -4PLII :5ML NOIR)
-4oadsoaa qunoW go 9bPTTTA 9q4 go saa4snal go
PaP09 PUP 4u9PTS91d 9q4 Aq 40P3 JO SBUTPUT; SP UTaa9q 9qPaodj00UT
9 -TV 9AoqleuT;9.T;9T4 T4-4.xo3 -49s 9TV-4TO91 9T4-4 4PT41 :aNO NOIl3fS-
:SIONIqqI 'AiNnoo X003 '.LoadSoUd INnOW do HOTIUIA alll do SaalSfIHI
do CIUVOEI (INV LlNa(IIS212id alu AS aaNIV(3HO ii ag lawaaaam, 'MON
-uTaaaq paqsenbea SUOT490TJTPOM
aqq buT4upab uT patxas aq PTnom abPTTTA aq4 JO s4s;aq-4uT
4Si9q 9144 -41elq-4 P6UTUL;Ea:49P BAR14 S;D9'4Sn.TI 30 P-TP09 Pule -4UBPTS9-Td
atlq pule 1-4oadso.Tcl -4unol4 go 9bPTTTA 9tT4 JO S99-4sn-ll 90 PaleOq
pule quepTsaad atiq oq uTeaeti pa4sanbaj U0T4P0T3TP0m alq4 04 OATqPT9a
UOT-4PPU9=10081 S -4T PaPaPMJOJ S1214 UOTSS'TMMoZ) UleTd 9tl'4 'S'
VaUSHM
PUP !0662 loz -Taquiaqdas
uo buTqaaui aPTnbaj aTelqq 4P Aqaadoad qoa[qnS aqq aoj (9T a94dPq0)
apoo -4uamdo-[aA;aa ;aqq Moaj UOTqPDTJTPOm pasodoid aq-4 ;rapTsuoo
pTp 4oadsoad 4unow go 9bPTTTA al'44 Ja UOTSSTM-UOD UPTd 9q4 'svauaHM
-squamaimbea
buTAsd TTV 490m TTvqs OPs 9P Tno 9LILL -qUPrj PooMPTTM
uo (,CZ) q993 99x4q-Aqu9m-4 go qqpTm 4uamaApd 4Tuiaad ol •t,
!(,OZT) qaaj Aquamq paapunq auo uvq4
Ss9T 04 L PUP 9 'C 'Z s4OU uO q4PTm 40T mnmiUTU 9q4 aonpaa ol c
'(,OOL)
4a93 PaJPUnq u9A9s 90 q4bu9T ales 9P Tno paspaaouT UP 4T=ad os z
!Sqqa4
ApmX.Tvd xoj utoox :ju9To-r33ns m0TTle TTTm T40TT4M '0PS ;aP Tno
9q4 uO sXTvm9PTs aOJ 4U9Ul9ZTnbaj aq4 94VUTUITT9 4Tuiaad of 'T
:9po0 4uamdoTaAaa aq4 uioag
SUOTqVOTJTPOm bUTmOTTOJ eqq buTqsanbea ST a9UOT4T49d 91q4 'SVaHaHM
ME
P9419SUT aq 04 UOT4dTaDSap jPbaU
:SMOTTOJ se paqTaDs9P ATTPbaT
PUP (Aqzradoad -409[qnS SP 0-4 P9-la939ZE a;9-43VUT9.X9tj) UOTSTATpqns
94vd 9144 se umOuX ATTRa9u9f) A4jadoad aog qunoW go abPTTTA'914-4 .40
(9T a9qdPT40) apoo 4u9md0T9A9G 9q4 MOIJ SUOT4PDT3TPOUI pa4sanbaa seg
(a-9U0T4T49d SP 04 P9aa9392 a943PUT9a9q) 94Pd IsvaHaHM
NOISIAIcans and alll NIHIIM GaLLVOOrl
ArlrlvuaNao Ailuadoud Hod loadsoud lKnow do
aGOD aDVrIIIA alll do naGOD INaWdOqaAaUji Ga7lIlNa
91 UaldVHD do SNOIJjDaS ONIAdICION aDNVNIGHO KV
ON aDKVNIGUO
/avo
Pate Modifications
Page 2 of 2
SECTION THREE: Except for the modification from the Development
Code granted herein, all other requirements of said Development
Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A RECAPTURE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN HELEN PATE
AND THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
WHEREAS, Helen Pate is the first owner to develop property commonly
known as the Pate Subdivision, and as such is required to install
a water main and roadway; and
WHEREAS, the installation of the water main and roadway will
benefit future development within the general area and inasmuch as
Helen Pate has paid for this improvement and in accordance with
Section 22.701 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect it has been
determined that it would be in the best interests of the Village
to enter into a Recapture Agreement in order for Helen Pate to
recapture a portion of the cost in this improvement.
WHEREAS, the Recapture Agreement being the subject of this
ordinance shall apply to the following property:
(Legal to be inserted)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests
of the Village would be served by entering into a Recapture
Agreement with Helen Pate, being the developer of property commonly
known as the Pate Subdivision, said Recapture Agreement is attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". The cost of
said Recapture, as determined by the village Engineer, as it
applies to future development is set forth in Exhibit "B" attached
hereto and hereby made a part hereof.
SECTION TWO: That a certified copy of this Ordinance and Recapture
Agreement shall be recorded in the Office of the Recorder of Deeds
or Registrar of Titles, whichever is applicable.
SECTION THREE: That this Ordinance shall be in full force and
...... . ... . .....
effect from and after its passage, approval and publication in
pamphlet form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
RECAPTURE AGREEMENT
This Agreement, made and entered into this day
of 1990, by and between the Village of Mount
Prospect, a municipal corporation of the State of Illinois,
hereinafter referred to as "Village" and Helen Pate hereinafter
referred to as "Owner", upon the mutual covenants and conditions
expressed hereto:
W I T N E S S E T H•
WHEREAS, the Village has adopted a municipal ordinance
requiring the installation of a water main, appurtenant facilities,
and a portion of roadway hereinafter referred to as "Facilities",
for property owned by owners, which land and territory is
hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property and legally
described as follows:
(Legal description to be inserted)
and
WHEREAS, the Facilities are to be dedicated to the Village for the
use by the Village for the purpose of a water main and public
roadway; and
WHEREAS, the Village and the Owners agree that the contract herein
is for and in the best interests of all concerned would be served
by entering into a Recapture Agreement with owners, in accordance
with Section 22.702.0 of Chapter 22 of the Village Code of Mount
Prospect.
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants
hereinafter setforth, it is hereby agreed by the parties hereto:
1. Owners do warrant that all labor and material costs and all
other charges relating to said water main and roadway and the
installation thereof have been paid and that all necessary
consents maintenance, repair and replacement of said sanitary
sewer main have been granted.
2. Upon the Owners delivering an executed deed for said water main
and roadway to the Village, the Village shall enter into a
Recapture Agreement with the owners.
3. That the property owners of Lots 3 and 4 and Reese's Subdivision
or a part thereof, shall have the right to connect to the water
main provided that owners be entitled to collect the sum of one-
tenth (1/10) the total installed cost, and the property owner by
entitled to collect from the owner of Lot 4 a proportionate cost
of street improvements. other pertinent details and obligations
of this agreement are in Exhibit B attached, a February 20, 1990
memo, as revised, by the Engineering Coordinator.
4. Whenever the owners of adjacent property being the subject of
this Agreement make application to the Village for connection to
said water main the village shall use its best efforts to inform
said applicant that the appropriate aforestated fee is due and
owing owners.
A. Thereafter, prior to issuance of any such permit to
such applicant, the Village shall ascertain whether
such applicant has paid owner accordingly by sending
notice of such application to owners.
Recapture Agreement
Page 2 of 2
B. The Village shall not be obligated to deny any such
permit to any such applicant merely because said tap -on
fee has not been paid to Owners.
5. The right of Owners to recovery and collection (by any legal
means including civil suit against such applicant) of any tap -on
fees for connection to the said sanitary sewer main shall inure to
it from the date hereof through December 31, 1998, and thereafter
Owners and/or their successors or assigns in interest shall have
no further right to collect the aforesaid fees and any obligation
herein of the Village to aid Owners to collect said fees shall
cease.
6. Owners do hereby agree to indemnify and hold harmless the
Village, its officers, agents, employees, successors and assigns,
from any and all claims or damages to real or personal property,
and from injuries or death suffered to any persons by reason of
the said sanitary sewer main, its construction or installation.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their
hands and seals this _ day of It 1990.
OWNERS:
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT:
Village President
F.IVWQ"QA
Village Clerk
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 103 SOUTH EDWARD STREET
WHEREAS, Elaine E. and Donald M. Dziedzic (hereinafter referred to
as Petitioners) have filed an application for variation from
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect, Illinois, for
property commonly known as 103 South Edward Street (hereinafter
referred to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 21 in Block 12 in Busse's Eastern Addition to Mount
Prospect in the East Half of Section 12, Township 41
North, Range 11, East of the Third Principal Meridian,
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek variations from Section 14.1102.A to
permit a zero foot front yard instead of the required 30 feet and
from Section 14.1102.B to permit a 41 811 side yard setback
instead of the required 5 feet, which would allow a parking pad
in the front yard; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 1-V-90 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
January, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof
published in the Mount Prospect herald on the 9th day of January,
1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property the
following variation:
1. A Variation from Section 14.1102.A to allow a zero foot (0')
front yard rather than the required thirty feet (301), and
2. A variation from Section 14.1102.B to allow a side yard
setback of 16.811
The variations granted herein will permit the construction of a
parking pad in the required front yard, subject to the Petitioner
creating a slope in the driveway that will provide for the
maximum water run-off to be detained on the subject property
rather than his neighbors property.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variation granted herein, all
other applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and
regulations shall remain in full force and effect as to the
Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section
14.604 of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
ZBA 1-V-90 - CAF
Page 2 of 2
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this ordinance.
SECTION THREE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
10) 114 03 4 ZE1 ZOO) ow fflA
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1000 NA WA TA
WHEREAS, Cleo and James Athans (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from certain
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 1000 Na Wa Ta (hereinafter
referred to as Subject Property), legally described as:
Lot 52 in Kaplan -Braun's Fourth Addition to Mount Prospect
Unit No. 1, being a subdivision of part of North 1/2 of
Section 14, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of the Third
Principal Meridian, Cook County, Illinois
and
WHEREAS, the Petitioners seek a variation from Section 14.102.B.1
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to allow a
detached storage shed to be located four feet six inches (41 611)
from the principal structure; a variation from Section 14.102.B.2
to permit a detached storage shed to be located two and one-half
feet (21 611) from the side lot line rather than the required 51;
and, a variation from Section 14.102.B.3 to permit a detached
storage shed ten feet six inches in height rather than the
permitted 101 height; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variations requested
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 4-V-90 before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
January, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 9th day of January, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.102.8.3 to permit a storage shed ten feet six
inches (101 611) in height, subject to relocating the shed to a
conforming location no later than July 1, 1990.
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
0
ZBA 4-V-90
Page 2 of 2
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of '1990.
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Caro 1...
A. Fields
Village Clerk
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING VARIATIONS FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 4 NORTH PINE STREET
WHEREAS, Joseph and Jean Reibel (hereinafter referred to as
Petitioners) have filed an application for variations from certain
provisions of Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect,
Illinois, for property commonly known as 4 North Pine Street
(hereinafter r6ferred to as Subject Property), legally described
as:
Lot 9 on Block 3 of the Ernest Busse Addition to Mount
Prospect a subdivision of the south 543 feet of the east one
half of the southwest 1/4 of Section 34, Township 41 North,
Range 11 east of the Third Principal Meridian as recorded on
Document 5708075
and
WHEREAS, Petitioners seek variations from Section 14.1102.B.1 of
Chapter 14 of the Village Code of Mount Prospect to permit a three
foot six inch (31 611) side yard setback instead of the required 51
and a variation from Section 14.1102.A to permit front yard
setbacks of 23.1 feet (23.11) for a porch and 28 feet to the
building wall instead of the required 301; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the variation requested being
the subject of ZBA Case No. 9-V-90 before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
January, 1990, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof published
in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 10th day of January, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect and the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village have given further consideration to the variations
requested.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
herein as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees
of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect hereby grant to the Subject Property a variation
from Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a three foot five inch (31 511)
side yard and a variation from Section 14.1102.A to permit front
yard setbacks of 23.1 feet (23.11) for a porch and 28 feet to the
building wall instead of the required 301. Such variations are
subject to the following conditions:
1. A drainage plan be prepared by a registered engineer for a
swaile along the south line of the property.
2. The Village of Mount Prospect Engineering Division inspect and
approve the drainage swaile prior to occupancy of the house.
3. There shall be no temporary or permanent sump pump discharge
into the south side yard.
r'
ZBA 9-V-90
Page 2 of
SECTION THREE: Except for the variations granted herein, all other
applicable Village of Mount Prospect Ordinances and regulations
shall remain in full force and effect as to the Subject Property.
SECTION FOUR: In accordance with the provisions of Section 14.604
of Chapter 14 of the Village Code, the variations granted
herein shall be null and void unless permits are issued and
construction begins within one (1) year from the date of passage
of this Ordinance.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
P.1VWQ2&V%q
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
'1990
'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ROGERS INDUSTRIAL PARK
LOCATION: SOUTHWEST CORNER OF ELMHURST AND ALGONQUIN ROADS
DATE: JANUARY 31, 1990
The applicant is requesting a rezoning of the subject property, from B-3 to I-1, Light
Industrial. They also are requesting a special use for a Planned Unit Development in order
to permit three office/warehouse buildings for light industrial use in a business park setting.
The total building square footage will be 114,038 square feet.
It has been almost one year since the Rogers Company first appeared before the Zoning
Board of Appeals and the Plan Commission. After receiving recommendation for approval
from the Zoning Board and Plan Commission of their respective requests, a review by the
Illinois Department of Transportation delayed the processing of this case to the Village
Board level. As a result of the long review process by I.D.O.T. the Rogers Company once
again appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on December 21, 1989 to present the
same proposal. The findings of both the Zoning Board of Appeals and Plan Commission
are itemized below.
The Rogers Company first appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 23,
1989 to request rezoning and a Special Use/Planned Unit Development for this industrial
park. The Company described their history and indicated that they have other industrial
and/or office parks located in the nearby suburbs. The subject parcel was shown on an
area map along with the adjacent land uses. All adjacent parcels are zoned B-3, B-4 or
I-1. This property is currently zoned B-3, which would allow for commercial uses including
fast-food restaurants. The property is vacant.
Representatives of the Rogers Company noted that the project is compatible with the
neighboring uses and meets all Zoning Ordinance requirements. Approximately 30
individual tenant spaces will be provided for light industrial, assembly and office. The users
in this park will primarily be high-tech operations, selected by the Rogers Company and will
comply with Village performance standards. A brief overview of the landscape plan was
presented by the landscape architect. Another representative of the Company, indicated
that 8 to 13 trucks are predicted to enter the project on a daily basis. It is estimated that
this project will generate between $148,000 and $171,000 in real estate taxes annually.
John Fulton. Dixon - Page 2
January 31, 1990
The staff pointed out that an office development had been approved for this site in 1985,
but was never built. The Rogers project is somewhat similar in appearance, but because
of the warehouse area; requires an I-1 zoning.
The staff indicated that this proposal is compatible with the surrounding land uses and is
complimentary to what the Alter Company is marketing across Algonquin Road. It was
noted that the Rogers Company has worked closely with the staff to arrive at this site plan
and landscape design.
The Board discussed the Planned Unit Development/Special Use standards in the Zoning
Code and it was determined that this project meets all those standards. The Board then
voted unanimously 4-0 to rezone the property from B-3 to I-1 and also to grant a Special
Use/Planned Unit Development for 114,038 square feet of office and warehouse assembly
space as shown in petitioner's Exhibits 1 and 2. There were no objectors present at this
hearing to voice any concerns.
After this initial Zoning Board meeting, the Rogers Company approached the Illinois
Department of Transportation for approval of curb cuts on Algonquin Road. It took many
months working with I.D.O.T. to resolve a problem with the driveway on Algonquin Road
and as a result, the site plan had been slightly revised. Therefore, since so much time had
elapsed from the first meeting, this case was sent back to the Zoning Board for a re-
hearing. On December 21, 1989, the Rogers Company once again appeared before the
Zoning Board with virtually the same plan. The Rogers Company has satisfied I.D.O.T. by
providing a shared driveway arrangement off of Algonquin Road for both their neighbor
to their west, Keolyn Plastics, and the new Rogers Industrial Park. This required a minor
change in the landscape plan.
The Zoning Board of Appeals, without discussion, moved to approve the rezoning and a
Special Use/ PUD subject to additional landscaping on the site approved by staff, in an
attempt to increase landscaping along the perimeter of the site. The vote was unanimous
6-0 in favor of recommending approval, and no objectors were present at this hearing to
voice any concerns.
I
The Rogers Company appeared before the Plan Commission on Wednesday, March 1, 1989.
They requested both a Comprehensive Plan change and a plat of subdivision approval from
the Commission. It was noted by staff at this meeting, that the proposed office
industrial/office designation would be appropriate for these parcels. A similar designation
was recently approved for Lake Center Plaza just north of this property. The existing
general commercial/office designation, in staff's opinion, may not be the best land use
classification considering the trend of development in the area. Staff also had no objections
to the subdivision plat. The Plan Commission voted unanimously 6-0 to recommend
approval of both.
John Fulton Dixon - Pagt,3
January 31, 1990
On January 17, 1990, the Rogers Company once again appeared before the Plan
Commission to request a Development Code modification in order to permit water
detention in truck dock areas to accumulate storm water in excess of 1 foot in depth. This
depth would be necessary in order to provide adequate detention for the 100 year flood
plain requirements. Staff had two concerns relating to soil saturation and freezing and
thawing effects of the building foundation and footings. At this hearing, the applicant
responded to those concerns noting that the soils and the freezing and thawing effects will
not have a negative impact on the buildings, The Plan Commission then voted unanimously
5-0 to recommend approval of this Development Code modification. There were no
neighbors or objectors present at this hearing to voice any concerns.
In summary, the Rogers Company is requesting the following:
1. Rezoning from B-3 to 1-1, Light Industrial for the subject property.
2. A Special Use/Planned Unit Development allowing 114,038 square feet of
office/warehouse space as shown in petitioner's revised site plan (subject to
increased landscaping on site to be approved by staff).
3. A change in the Comprehensive Plan in order to allow industrial and office
rather than general commercial/office.
4. Plat of Subdivision.
5. A Development Code modification regarding storm water detention in the
loading docks.
go
Approved:
ALGONQUIN ROAD
9
I
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP WITH
RESPECT TO THE ZONING OF CERTAIN PROPERTY FROM
B-3 TO I-1 (LIGHT INDUSTRIAL) DISTRICT
AS IT PERTAINS TO THE ROGERS SUBDIVISION
WHEREAS, Arthur J. Rogers (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) ,
has filed an application to rezone the property commonly known as
Rogers Subdivision (hereinafter referred to as Subject Property),
legally described as follows:
The North 760.96 feet as measured along the west and east
lines of the east 20 acres of the north east 1/4 of the south
east 1/4 of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of
the Third Principal Meridian (except the north 300 feet of the
east 450 feet thereof) also (except the last 50 feet of the
south 460.96 feet of said north 760.96 feet thereof used for
Elmhurst Road) , also excepting that portion of Algonquin Road
used for public purposes, all in Cook County, Illinois;
and
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested the Subject Property be rezoned
from B-3 to I-1 (Light Industrial) District; and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for rezoning
being the subject of ZBA Case No. 81-Z-89) before the Zoning Board
of Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 21st day of
December, 1989, pursuant to due and proper notice thereof having
been published in the Mount Prospect Herald on the 5th day of
December, 1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendation to the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the village of
Mount Prospect have considered the request being the subject of ZBA
81-Z-88 and have determined that the best interests of the Village
of Mount Prospect would be served by granting said request.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The official zoning map of the Village of Mount
Prospect, Illinois, as amended, is hereby further amended by
reclassifying the property being the subject of this ordinance to
I-1 (Light Industrial) District.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of 1990.
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
village Clerk
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE IN THE NATURE OF
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY
LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ELMHURSTAND ALGON UIN ROADS
WHEREAS, Arthur J. Rogers (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner)
has filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property
generally located at the southeast corner of Elmhurst Road and
Algonquin Roads (hereinafter referred to as the Subject Property);
and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
The North 760.96 feet as measured along the west and east
lines of the east 20 acres of the north east 1/4 of the south
east 1/4 of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range it East of
the Third Principal Meridian (except the north 300 feet of the
east 450 feet thereof) also (except the last 50 feet of the
south 460.96 feet of said north 760.96 feet thereof used for
Elmhurst Road), also excepting that portion of Algonquin Road
used for public purposes, all in Cook County, Illinois;
I—M
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 82 -SU -89) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 21st day of
December, 1989, pursuant to proper legal notice having been
published in the Mountq_ gXAJA on the 5th day of December,
1989; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings on
the proposed Special Use to the President and Board of Trustees;
and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have determined that the best interests of the
Village of Mount Prospect will be attained by the adoption of the
following Ordinance regarding the Subject Property.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporated herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That the Planned Unit Development hereinabove
authorized and permitted shall be constructed pursuant to the site
plan dated 9-29-88 and prepared by Arthur J. Rogers & Co. and
submitted as evidence and exhibits for ZBA Case No. 82 -SU -89.
SECTION THREE: That the Planned Unit Development includes the
following variations of the Planned Unit Development standards of
Section 14.2503:
A. To permit storm water retention in the required loading dock
areas.
SECTION FOUR: That development of the Planned Unit Development is
0
ZBA 82 -SU -89
Page 2 of 2
subject to the following condition:
A. Submittal of a revised landscape plan showing additioan
perimeter plantings.
SECTION FIVE: This ordinance shall be in full force and effect
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
M -1 -MAW
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
. 1990.
CAF/
AN ORDINANCE MODIFYING SECTIONS OF CHAPTER 16
ENTITLED "DEVELOPMENT CODE" OF THE VILLAGE CODE
FOR PROPERTY GENERALLY LOCATED
AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF ELMHURSTAND ALGONQUIN ROADS
WHEREAS, Arthur J. Rogers (hereinafter referred to a Petitioner)
is the owner property generally located at the southeast corner of
Elmhurst and Algonquin Roads, (hereinafter referred to as "Subject
Property") and legally described as:
The North 760.96 feet as measured along the west and east
lines of the east 20 acres of the north east 1/4 of the south
east 1/4 of Section 23, Township 41 North, Range 11 East of
the Third Principal Meridian (except the north 300 feet of the
east 450 feet thereof) also (except the last 50 feet of the
south 460.96 feet of said north 760.96 feet thereof used for
Elmhurst Road), also excepting that portion of Algonquin Road
used for public purposes, all in Cook County, Illinois;
1.l
WHEREAS, Petitioner has requested a modification from the
Development Code (Chapter 16) of the Village of Mount to permit
storm retention in the required loading dock area for the Subject
Property in conjunction with the development of an office/
industrial park; and
WHEREAS, the Plan Commission of the Village of Mount Prospect did
consider the proposed modification from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) for the Subject Property and has forwarded its
recommendation relative to the modification requested herein to the
President and Board of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect,
and the President and Board of Trustees have determined that the
best interests of the Village would be served in granting the
modifications requested herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
ECTION ONE: That the recitals set forth hereinabove are
incorporate herein as findings of fact by the President and Board
of Trustees of the Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: That a modification from the Development Code
(Chapter 16) is hereby granted to the Subject Property to permit
storm water retention in the required loading dock in excess of one
inch (111) in depth, in conjunction with the development of an
office/ industrial park, as indicated on the site plan attached
hereto and hereby made a part of as Exhibit "A".
SECTION FOUR: Except for the modification from the Development
Code granted herein, all other requirements of said Development
Code shall apply to the Subject Property.
SECTION FIVE: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
Rogers
Modification
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. ,Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
, 1990
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-SU-90, CAR -TEL, INC.
LOCATION: PLAZA UNITED SHOPPING CENTER
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1990
CarTel, Inc. is requesting a special use in order to operate an automotive service installing
cellular car phones, in conjunction with retail sales of cellular telephones, and related items
in this B-3 retail shopping center. The representatives of the DiMucci Corporation, the
landlord of Plaza United Shopping Center, appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals
on February 1, 1990. Representatives of CarTel, Inc. were not present.
DiMucci representatives stated that CarTel is primarily a retail sales operation of cellular
car phones, however, installation of these phones is also involved. They request permission
to install an overhead garage door at the rear of this tenant space in order to bring autos
into an installation area. The fact that the cars will be serviced on the premises requires
a special use permit in the B-3 Zoning District.
The Village raised their main concern of compatibility of this proposed use with the other
retail tenants in the center. Although CarTel will appear as a retail storefront, this type of
service installation would be unusual and would be a change from the original intent of this
Plaza United retail center. It was pointed out to the Board that there are similar car
service operations located in the Village, however, they are located in auto malls and not
retail centers. The other operations typically install more than just car telephones.
The Zoning Board then discussed the issues among themselves. Some members felt that
there was no benefit to be gained by allowing this type of use. Also there was some
concern among most Board members that the CarTel representatives were not present at
the hearing to address any concerns or show any interest in the outcome of this case. The
Board then voted on the special use request with the condition that sales and installation
be limited to car phone only and that if, CarTel would ever leave, this space would then
revert back to retail with the overhead door being removed from the building. The vote
was 3 ayes and 2 nays, which denied the request. The Village Board would need a super
majority vote to overturn this decision. There were no objectors present at the hearing.
Approved:
wk Nt,
David M. Clements, Director
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 8 -SU -90 Hearing Date: January 25, 1990
February 1, 1990
PETITIONER: CarTel, Inc.
SUBJECT PROPERTY: 1641 S. Busse, Plaza United Shopping Ctr.
PUBLICATION DATE: January 9, 1990
REQUEST: A Special Use per Section 14.2001.C.1 to allow
an auto service operation in the B-3 Shopping
Center District. The auto service operation is
for a car phone retail sales/installation business.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT: Gilbert Basnik, Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Lois Brothers
ABSENT: Ronald Cassidy
Len Petrucelli
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
This case was continued from the January 25, 1990 Zoning Board of Appeals meeting.
Chairman Basnik introduced this case as being a request for a special use to allow an auto
car phone retail sales and installation business in the B-3 Shopping Center District.
Bruce Blanck, 1417 Andersen Drive, Palatine, Illinois, a representative of DiMucci
Development, presented the case for CarTel, Inc. He explained that DiMucci
Development were the owners of the shopping center, and that they were assisting CarTel
in this request. He announced that the representative from CarTel was enroute but delayed
in traffic.
Mr. Blanck began his presentation by stating that the DiMucci Development secured this
tenant before requesting a Special Use permit, because they felt it was a typical retail use
and did not anticipate any problems. He noted that this is a high-tech retail business and
the installation of phones in automobiles is incidental to the actual use.
He further stated that the 2,400 square foot facility has a normal retail, storefront, and does
not resemble an automotive business. The cars that will have a phone installed, will drive
to the rear of the store, where there is ample maneuvering space. They anticipate only
three to four cars per day. The bay is not visible from the street so there is no negative
impact on the other tenants in the shopping center. The cars will not remain on the
premises over night. He further noted that the nature of their business does not lend itself
to an automotive mall and CarTel does not wish to locate in one. He addressed staffs
suggestion of installing a sprinkler system in the unit by stating that they felt this was
unjustified for this type of use, as there would be no gasses, offs or inflammables of any
ZBA-8-SU-90
January 25, 1990
Page 2 of 2
kind stored on the premises. He comparedCarTel to an A T & 'T Cellular Phone Store.
He also noted that this is not the first service store in Plaza United, and alluded to Wave
Printing and Business World Int., as an example of service oriented uses.
Paul Bednar; Planner, represented the Village of Mount Prospect. He explained that the
reason why CarTel required a Special Use permit was because it becomes an automotive
operation when installation' is done on the premises. He expressed a concern that this type
of service may not be compatible with the other retail users in the center. A sprinkler
system must be installed as a result, of the garage stall to avoid a fire hazard, as per, the
Fire and Inspection Services` Departments. He noted that when CarTel representatives
were questioned by phone about the possibility of cars remaining in the -fire lanes to get
into the rear of the store, they said it is possible, especially on weekends.
Mr. Bednar further noted that there are no comparable automotive operations in the
Village which are located in strip shopping centers. ,. He mentioned that there are two
similar operations (car phones, burglar alarms and stereos), however, they are located in
auto malls. He emphasized that the compatibility of this use with the other retail users in
this shopping center should be examined and be the basis for a recommendation.
Discussion ensued among the Zoning Board members regarding their various concerns.
These included: the parking behind the building, the possible increase in future sales
creating overnight parking, the potential increase in future services, such as, installation of
burglar alarms, the impact of this use on future retail users, and the special use
classification for the parcel should CarTel vacate the premises. They also felt that a
representative from CarTel should have been present.
Mr. Brettrager, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, moved to grant the petitioner's request for a
Special Use per Section 14.2001.C.1 in Case ZBA-9-SU-90 to operate an automotive car
phone retail sales/installation business, per Petitioner's Exhibit No. 1 subject to the
following:
1. The special use permit be limited to the installation of cellular car phones in
conjunction with retail sales of cellular telephones and related items in said
premises.
2. Ile special use permit use to become null and void when this tenant vacates the
premises,
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Lannon, Petrucelli, Brettrager
NAYS: 4'May,' Basnih
A motion to approve the request resulted in a 3-2 vote, not gaining the 4 votes necessary
for approval. ''Approval by the Village Board will require a super -majority of 5 votes.
These recommendations will be forwarded to the Village Board for their: consideration,
Helen Giordano,
Recording Secretary ;
VILIAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEA CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER 11—J)11e=
SUBJECT: ZBA-8-SU-90, CAR -TEL, INC.
LOCATION: PLAZA UNITED SHOPPING CENTER
DATE: JANUARY 16, 1990
REQUE
The applicant is requesting a special use per Section 14.200l.C.1 to operate an automotive
service installing cellular car phones, in conjunction with retail sales of cellular telephones,
and related items.
VILLA -GE STAFF COMMENTS
If allowed, this tenant would be the only one in the shopping center with cars entering and
exiting the building. The Inspection Services Department notes that this could create a
traffic problem. The parking or "staging" of cars at the proposed rear garage door entrance
will not be allowed per the Fire Department. A sprinkler system must be installed in this
tenant space as a result of the garage stall. Water service to the building may have to be
increased in order to facilitate the sprinkler system. All other building codes must be met
for this change in use from what was originally retail to auto service.
CarTel, Inc. desires to open a store in the new Plaza United Shopping Center at the corner
of Algonquin and Busse Roads. CarTel's business is primarily retail sales of cellular car
phones, however, installation of these phones is also involved. The applicants are
requesting permission to install an overhead garage door at the rear of the building, in
order to bring one auto at a time into an installation area. The fact that cars will be
serviced on the premises requires a special use permit in this B-3 zoning district.
The Plaza United Shopping Center is located at the edge of an already developed
commercial area. There are shopping centers located to the west on Busse Road and also
to the southwest on Algonquin Road. Both a gas/service station and a gas mart are located
on two comers of Busse and -Algonquin Roads. To the north of this shopping center is an
apartment complex and to the east is the United Airlines campus, This shopping center
was originally intended to be a retail strip center of approximately 26,000 square feet. One
hundred and five parking spaces are provided which is enough to accommodate retail users.
All the parking provided is in front of the stores. At the rear of the building fire lanes and
loading areas are provided.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
January 16, 1990
The most important question the Zoning Board must address is that of the compatibility
of the proposed use with the other retail tenants in the center. CarTel will operate a retail
storefront, but car telephone installation, or the service aspect of the business, is unusual
in a retail center. However, there are instances in the Village where car service operations
are located in a freestanding building, as part of a shopping center. The Ward's Auto
Service Center at Randhurst is an example. Also, there are two businesses in the Village
where car telephones are installed. These businesses specialize in auto related items such
as stereos, alarms and telephones. These uses are in auto malls.
CarTel is somewhat different than the uses described above. The Company has a retail
storefront, and items are sold that do not require installation on an automobile. Installation
at CarTel is a service to a customer, an accessory use to retail sales. However, floor area
devoted to car telephone installations is significant, and this serves as an important part of
the business.
As stated, compatibility of this use in a retail center is important. Plaza United is a recently
developed retail center, and a use such as CarTel with a significant service business is
somewhat different than the staff envisioned for this property. The petitioner must
demonstrate how this use will be beneficial for Plaza United, and not cause any adverse
effect on other uses. Also, the property owner must discuss re -use potential for this space
should CarTel relocate. Because of these issues, a use such as CarTel, might be better
placed in a more appropriate B4 District, where the compatibility question is not a factor.
The tenant mix at Plaza United might be better left to businesses with an emphasis on
retailing.
12-M.
CAF/
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A SPECIAL USE FOR PROPERTY
COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1641 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
WHEREAS, CarTel, Inc. (hereinafter referred to as Petitioner) has
filed a petition for a Special Use with respect to property
commonly known as 1641 South Busse Road (hereinafter referred to
as the Subject Property); and
WHEREAS, the Subject Property is legally described as follows:
Lot 1 in Plaza United Subdivision being a subdivision of
part of the northeast 1/4 of Section 22 and part of the
Northwest 1/4 of Section 23 in Township 41 North, Range
11 East of the Third Principal Meridian in Cook County,
Illinois;
M-1
WHEREAS, Petitioner seeks a Special Use to permit an auto service
operation in the B-3 Shopping Center District the Subject Property;
and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on the request for Special Use
(designated as ZBA Case No. 8 -SU -90) before the Zoning Board of
Appeals of the Village of Mount Prospect on the 25th day of
January, 1990, and the 1st day of February, 1990, pursuant to
proper legal notice having been published in the Mount Prospect
Herald on the 9th day of January, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Zoning Board of Appeals has submitted its findings
and recommendations to the President and Board of Trustees in
support of the request being the subject of ZBA 8 -SU -90; and
WHEREAS, the President and Board of Trustees of the Village of
Mount Prospect have given consideration to the request herein and
have determined that the same meets the standards of the Village
and that the granting of the proposed Special Use would be in the
best interest of the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE PRESIDENT AND BOARD OF
TRUSTEES OF THE VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS:
SECTION ONE: The recitals set forth hereinabove are incorporated
as findings of fact by the President and Board of Trustees of the
Village of Mount Prospect.
SECTION TWO: The President and Board of Trustees of the Village
of Mount Prospect do hereby grant a Special Use to the subject
property to permit an auto service operation in a B-3 zoning
district. The Special Use granted herein will permit the sale and
installation of cellular car phones, with the service area
accessible through an overhead door located in the rear of the
building. Said Special Use is subject the provision that no
vehicle shall be permitted to remain in the service area overnight
as a result of this operation.
SECTION THREE: That this ordinance shall be valid for the purpose
intended and specifically for CarTel, Inc. and if said CarTel, Inc.
ceases operation then the Special Use being the subject of this
Ordinance shall be null and void and the overhead door shall be
removed and the structure shall be returned to the same design as
existed prior to this Special Use.
SECTION FOUR: This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect
a
ZBA 8 -SU -90
Page 2 of 2
from and after its passage, approval and publication in pamphlet
form in the manner provided by law.
AYES:
NAYS:
ABSENT:
PASSED and APPROVED this day of
Gerald L. Farley
Village President
ATTEST:
Carol A. Fields
Village Clerk
1990.
(Chapman and Cutler
February 21, 19901
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE
EXECUTION OF AN INTERIM PROJECT USE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the Village of Mt. Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois (the "Municipality") desires to provide an efficient and
environmentally sound system for the collection, transportation,
processing, storage and disposal of municipal solid waste,
providing such a system is in the best interests of the public
health, safety and welfare of the Municipality and its
inhabitants; and
WHEREAS, Article VII, Section 10 of the 1970 Constitu-
tion of the State of Illinois authorizes units of local govern-
ment to contract and associate among themselves to obtain or
share services and to exercise, combine, or transfer any power or
function, in any manner not prohibited by law or ordinance; and
WHEREAS, under that Constitutional provision, units of
local government may use their credit, revenues, and other
resources to pay costs and the service debt related to inter-
governmental activities; and
WHEREAS, the Intergovernmental Cooperation Act, as
amended (Ill. Rev. Stat., Ch. 127, paragraph 741 et seq.) also
authorizes units of local government to exercise and enjoy
jointly their powers, privileges or authority and to enter into
intergovernmental agreements for that purpose; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality, together with other member
units of local government (the "Members"), has previously entered
into an Agreement Establishing the Solid Waste Agency of Northern
Cook County as a Municipal Joint Action Agency (the "Agency
Agreement"), and has become a member of the Solid Waste Agency of
Northern Cook County (the "Agency"), in order to provide and
operate an efficient and environmentally sound municipal solid
waste system (the "System"); and
WHEREAS, the Agency has contracted for the preparation
of detailed design and engineering plans for a municipal solid
waste project consisting of an efficient and environmentally
sound balefill providing for the disposal of compressed solid
waste, which may include (but is not limited to) leachate and gas
collection and drainage equipment, a leak detection and
groundwater monitoring system, rolling stock, structures,
equipment and other related improvements constituting a solid
L
waste processing, recovery and disposal facility, together with
one or more solid waste transfer and processing stations (the
"Project"), has acquired or will acquire a site or sites or
interests in sites for the Project and options therefor, will
obtain all necessary zoning and land use permits, prepare and
file applications for other necessary governmental permits,
acquire equipment for the Project, commence construction of the
Project, and will do all other things necessary or desirable to
prepare for and to begin the acquisition, construction, equipping
and improvement of the Project (collectively, the "Interim
Project"); and
WHEREAS, the Agency has previously issued its
$5,500,000 Contract Revenue and Bond Anticipation Notes, Series
1988 and its $2,000,000 Contract Revenue and Bond Anticipation
Notes, Series 1989 (the "Prior Notes") to finance a portion of
the Interim Project; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality has previously entered into
an interim project use agreement with the Agency under which the
Agency issued the Prior Notes and the Municipality is paying its
proportionate share of the aMt.s necessary to pay principal of
and interest on the Prior Notes; and
WHEREAS, the Agency will now borrow up to $16,250,000
and will issue its contract revenue notes in an aMt. up to
$16,250,000 (the "Series 1990 Notes") to finance the costs of the
Interim Project and to purchase or pay the Prior Notes, including
without limitation engineering and design fees and expenses,
costs of acquiring a site or sites for the Project or interests
in sites or options therefor, costs of equipment for the Project,
costs of construction of the Project, expenses of the Agency and
its staff, legal and other professional fees and expenses in
connection with the Project, payment or purchase of the Prior
Notes, financial, legal, administrative and other expenses of the
authorization, issuance, sale and delivery of the Series 1990
Notes, reimbursement to Members and other contributors for costs
of the Interim Project previously incurred in anticipation of the
issuance of the Series 1990 Notes, capitalized interest and
appropriate reserves and contingencies; and
WHEREAS, both principal of and interest on the Series
1990 Notes will be payable solely from (1) proceeds of refunding
bonds or notes of the Agency which may be used for that purpose;
(2) receipts of the Agency from any Members or Customers under
Interim Project Use Agreements between the Agency and such
Members and Customers; (3) any aMt.s on hand at any time in the
Project Fund Accounts, Debt Service Fund or Prepayment Fund to be
established in the Resolution of the Agency authorizing issuance
of the Series 1990 Notes (the "Series 1990 Note Resolution"); and
(4) interest or other investment earnings of the Agency on the
aMt.s in such accounts; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the best interests of
the Municipality to enter into an Interim Project Use Agreement
(the "Interim Agreement") with the Agency under which the Agency
will undertake the Interim Project and issue the Series 1990
Notes and the Municipality will pay its proportionate share of
the aMt.s necessary to pay principal of and interest on the
Series 1990 Notes; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary and in the best interests of
the Municipality to agree to pay additional aMt.s pursuant to the
"step up" provisions of Section 4.4 of the Interim Agreement and
to make an appropriation therefor; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality, by adopting the Interim
Agreement, and the other Members, by adopting similar interim
agreements, agree that they will be severally (and not jointly)
liable for their proportionate shares of the principal of and
interest on the Notes not paid from other funds of the Agency,
and for the step up obligation provided in Section 4.4 of the
Interim Agreement; and
WHEREAS, the obligation of the Municipality to make
payments under the Interim Agreement is separate from the
obligations of all other Members to make payments under their
respective Interim Project Use Agreements and shall not in any
respect be diminished or increased if any other Member or Members
default in their obligations under their respective Interim
Project Use Agreements, except for such step up obligation; and
WHEREAS, the obligations of the Municipality under the
Interim Agreement are general obligations of the Municipality to
the payment of which its full faith and credit and its taxing
power (unlimited as to rate or aMt.) are pledged. Such
obligations do not exceed any constitutional, statutory or other
applicable limitation on debt; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality is obligated under the
Interim Agreement to pay its respective share of the costs of the
Interim Project without set-off or counterclaim, irrespective of
whether the Interim Project, the Project or the System is ever
completed, made available or provided to the Municipality and
notwithstanding any suspension, interruption, interference,
reduction or curtailment of the Interim Project, the Project or
the System; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality is a home rule municipality
under the terms of Article VII, Section 6 of the Illinois
- 3 -
Constitution and may exercise any power and perform any function
pertaining to its government and affairs;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the President and
Board of Trustees of the Village of Mt. Prospect, Cook County,
Illinois, in the exercise of its home rule powers, as follows:
SECTION 1: That the Municipality approves the form of
the Interim Agreement presented to it at this meeting and the
President and Village Clerk are hereby authorized to execute the
Interim Agreement, in substantially the form attached to this
Ordinance as Exhibit 1 and made a part of this Ordinance, with
such changes therein as shall be approved by the persons
executing such agreement.
SECTION 2: That this Ordinance shall constitute an
appropriat�ionof the funds necessary to meet the Municipality's
obligations to make payments of its proportionate share of
principal of and interest on the Notes under the Interim
Agreement.
SECTION 3: That the Village Clerk is authorized and
directed to send the following to the Executive Director of the
Agency: (1) two certified copies of this Ordinance, (2) two
certificates of publication of this Ordinance evidencing
publication of this Ordinance in pamphlet form, and (3) two
certified copies of the minutes of the meeting at which this
Ordinance was adopted, showing the adoption of this Ordinance.
SECTION 4: That the President, the Village Clerk, and
other employees of the Municipality are authorized and directed
to take whatever additional steps are necessary' for the
Municipality to enter into the Interim Agreement.
SECTION 5: That this Ordinance shall be in full force
and effectir-m-m—edl"a—tely upon passage -and approval.
ATTEST:
PASSED this _ day of , 1990.
APPROVED this day of , 1990.
VOTE: AYES NAYS ABSENT
VILLAGE CLERK
Its President
- 4 -
Published in pamphlet form this
______ day of 1990
VILLAGE CLERK
Approved as to form:
Attorney
- 5 -
STATE OF ILLINOIS
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
I, , do hereby certify that I am the
qualified and acting Village Clerk of the Village of Mt.
Prospect, Cook County, Illinois, AND THAT AS SUCH, I am the
officer duly designated by law to keep the minutes, ordinances,
resolutions and proceedings of the President and Board of
Trustees of the Village of Mt. Prospect.
I further certify that the attached and foregoing copy
of ordinance is a true and correct copy of the records
of the Village of Mt. Prospect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I hereunto affix my signature and
impress hereon the corporate seal of the said Village of Mt.
Prosect, Cook County, Illinois, this - day of 1 1990.
Village Clerk
'VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1990
SUBJECT- ZBA-13-V-90, RICHARD AND PAT BROCK
LOCATION: 705 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
The applicants appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 22, 1990 to
request the following two variations:
1. Section 14.102. to allow a proposed addition to be 4.5' from the garage instead
of 10 feet as required by Code;
2. Section 14.1002.A to allow a 35.8' front yard setback to this new room addition
instead of 40' required by Code in an R -X Zoning District.
Mr. and Mrs. Brock presented their case before the Zoning Board and explained that they
would like a family room addition, expanded kitchen and a new front entrance to the house.
They stated that because of the floor plan in the existing home this new addition should be
located where proposed.
Staff noted that this is a large lot and is located at the comer of Greenbriar and Busse.
The new room addition will add approximately 600 square feet to the home. It would be
possible to locate this room addition off the rear of the house without requiring any
variations. Neither the Fire Department nor Inspection Services had an objection for the
41/2 foot separation between the existing garage and the new addition if conditioned upon
fire -rated drywall being installed in the existing garage. The bulk of the house has an
existing setback of 60 feet from Greenbriar Drive. The new addition would be almost 36
feet from Greenbriar. It was stated that no significant impact is anticipated as a result of
this front yard variation.
The Zoning Board discussed the proposal and expressed their support for the addition. It
was approved unanimously 6-0 with the condition that the petitioner install drywall in the
existing garage to comply with the Fire Department's request. There were no neighbors or
objectors present at the hearing to voice their concerns.
PB:hg
400.0
4
{I
k
6
d
\
ciL
4
4W
a so
'A4
N (�
70
EXiSriNU
FT,
� 4
�
01) La
ra+d4 R.RWA
NEW
°�'
v applrrON yu�
m
Tr.
M 7
'fl 4l
h,
nor'
1,4.,9 as
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 13-V-90
Hearing Date: February 22, 1990
PETITIONER:
Richard and Pat Brock
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
705 South Busse Road
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 7, 1990
REQUEST:
Variations from: Section 14.102. to allow a
4.5' setback separation from the existing garage
to the new room addition instead of 10 feet;
and Section 14.1002.A to allow a 35.8' front
yard instead of 40' required in an R -X Zoning
District, in order to allow a room addition.
Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
MEMBERS ABSENT: Gil Basnik
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: None
The petitioners, Richard and Patricia Brock, appeared before the Zoning Board to present
their case. Mrs. Brock noted that they are seeking to add a family room addition and
expand their kitchen. She also stated that the present entrance to the home is in the back
yard. The home was originally built around 1916.,,.. Mr. Brock noted that he was aware that
the Village would require a Class X 5/8" drywall in the existing garage. He reported that
this was acceptable to him.
Paul Bednar, Village Planner, noted that the subject lot is zoned R -X, is large, and is a
comer lot. The proposed new room as being requested, will add approximately 600 square
feet to the building. He noted that the lot does have enough room in the rear to
accommodate the Brocles addition without requiring variations. He further stated that staff
has no objection to the 4 1/2 foot separation between the garage and the addition provided
that Class X 5/8" drywall is used in the existing garage. This is recommended by the Fire
and Building staff for fire safety reasons. Mr. Bednar stated the house is set back 60 feet
from Greenbriar for the bulk of the house, and for that reason, the proposed improvements
should have no significant impact on the neighborhood.
ZBA-13-V-90
February 22, 1990
Page 2 of 2
The Zoning Board of Appeals asked about the tree in the front yard. Mr. Brock reported
that the tree will remain unless it interferes with construction.
Marilyn O'May moved, seconded by Robert Brettrager, to approve a 35.8 foot front yard
for a room addition as requested in Case No. :BA•13V-90.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Brothers, Lannon, O'May, Petrucelli, Cassidy
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This request is final by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
After further discussion, Marilyn O'May moved to approve the request in Case No. ZBA-
13-V-90 for a 4.5 foot setback separation from the existing garage to the new room addition,
conditioned upon 5/8" Class X drywall being used in the existing garage as noted in the
staff memo. The motion was seconded by Robert Brettrager.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Brothers, Lannon, O'May, PetrucellL Cassidy
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board.
Michael E. Sims,
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER--a-b —
SUBJECT: ZBA-13-V-90, RICHARD AND PAT BROCK
LOCATION: 705 SOUTH BUSSE ROAD
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1990
The applicants are requesting the following two variations:
1. Section 14.102. to allow a proposed addition to be 4.5' from the garage instead
of 10 feet as required by Code;
2. Section 14.1002.A to allow a 35.8' front yard setback to this new room addition
instead of 40' required by Code for an R -X Zoning District.
111
The Engineering Department notes that the existing house is already closer than 10 feet to
the detached garage. They also note that the proposed addition is shown to be located
over the existing sanitary service. This service line may have to be relocated before permits
are issued. A portion of the addition is shown to be 2'.4" lower than the existing
foundation. A grading plan will be required to be certain that drainage will work. It is
noted that the existing driveway is wider than 21 feet and will not be allowed to be
reconstructed at this width without a variation. Lastly, Inspection Services recommends that
the garage have Class X 5/8" drywall installed on all interior walls and ceiling due to the
proximity of the new room addition.
WkilmeltX401a
The Brocks reside at the corner of Busse Road and Greenbriar, in the established single
family neighborhood referred to as Golfview Estates. This area is zoned R -X, large lot
single family. This lot is just slightly larger than the typical lot found in this subdivision.
Other homes in the area appear to be set back between 30 and 40 feet from their front lot
lines.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-13-V-90
A new room addition of 600 square feet is proposed off the front corner of the existing
house. An existing garage is already located 4 1/2 feet away from the home. This addition
will be located the same 4 1/2 feet from the garage, thereby necessitating a variation. The
addition will encroach 4.2' into the 40 foot front yard requirement on Greenbriar Drive.
The existing garage is set back from the front property line approximately 40 feet.
As evidenced from the site plan, there is enough area behind the house to locate a room
addition. The petitioner should explain why the proposed addition must be located to the
front.
The major reason for the code requirement of a 10 foot separation between the garage and
the home is fire safety. Neither the Fire Department or Inspection Services have an
objection to this request if approval is conditioned upon the requirement of installation of
fire -rated dry -wall in the garage. Planning and Zoning concurs with this opinion. No
adverse impact upon the neighborhood is expected as a result of this variation.
The front yard setback for this room addition is proposed to be almost 36 feet. The bulk
of the house has an existing setback. of 60 feet from Greenbriar Drive. As mentioned
before, the new addition will project approximately 4 feet further than the garage wall.
We do not foresee any significant negative impact on the neighborhood as a result of this
front yard variation.
In summary, the petitioner must address why the addition cannot be added to the rear of
the house where there is ample space that would not require any variations. If allowed as
proposed, we are of the opinion that neither variation will have a significant impact upon
this neighborhood. The front yard encroachment is minimal especially when considering
that the bulk of this existing house is set back over 60 feet. The separation between the
garage and the new addition is already existing for a portion of the house and if this
separation is to be further extended, we recommend fire -rated drywall be installed in the
garage as a fire precaution.
PB:hg
`~*'TLLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPnCt
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDN
AR, PLANNER �.-
SUBJECT. ZBA-15-V-90, PARENTi & RAFFAELLI, LTD.
LOCATION: 215 EAST PROSPECT AVENUE
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1"0
Mr. Warren Kostak, the architect representing the petitioner, appeared before the Zoning
Board of Appeals on February 22, 1990. The petitioner is proposing a 7,720 square foot
addition to the existing 40,268 square foot building. Eight specific variations are necessary
as a result. Some of these are a result of existing non -conforming zoning requirements
due to the site geometry and building configuration. The remaining are requested to
accommodate this new addition. Each -variation is itemized below:
1. Section 14.2202.B.3 to allow an 11' side yard from the building to the west
property line instead of NY, a 25.56' side yard from the existing building to the east
property line instead of 30'.
2. Section 14.2202.A to allow the existing front yard of 29.57' instead of 30' as
required by Code.
3. Section 14.2202.0 to allow a 15' rear yard instead of 40' for the new paved
parking lot.
4. Section 14.2203.A to allow a lot size of 2.285 acres instead of 4 acres.
5. Section 14.3012.E to allow two 12' X 35' loading docks as proposed instead of two
12' X NY loading docks required by Code.
6. Section 14.3012 to allow 61 parking spaces instead of the required 66.
7. Section 14.2202.E and 14.3018 to allow a zero foot distance from, the property on
the east side for parking instead of 10', and 15' from the south property line instead
of 30'.
8. Section 14.2203.B to allow 84% impervious surface lot coverage (3,684 square feet
over the maximum) instead of 80% allowed by Code.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
February 27, 1990
Mr. Kostak went through each individual request and addressed the concerns in the Village
memo. Mr. Bob Parenti, the owner, addressed the Board regarding the need for the space.
He stated that there are no plans to add employees. The new space will provide more
working space for the existing 50 employees.
The staff presented their concerns to the Village Board. This 2.4 acre property is presently
zoned I-1 Light Industrial and has been for many years. This new woodworking business
has occupied this building for approximately two years. The surrounding area consists of
commuter parking to the west, other light industrial users to the east, and Lions Park to the
south. This building as well as the other light industrial buildings along Prospect Avenue
have many non -conformities with regards to zoning setbacks, lot coverage, parking, etc.
It was stated that staff has no problem with the variation request reflecting existing
conditions, i.e., the side yard setback on the west and east, front yard and the lot size. The
main concerns staff had with the building expansion was the variation of parking spaces.
It was noted upon field inspections that almost all the gravel parking lot is currently being
used for parking, and this was without the new building addition occupying 8,000 square feet
of a lot. In fact, 57 cars were counted on one recent morning.
The petitioner addressed the concern for parking and noted there will be no increase in
employees and that they will need approximately 48-50 spaces and there are 61 provided.
An increased setback along Lincoln Street is an option, however, as a result, that would
decrease the amount of parking on the lot. A variation for loading dock sizes may be
reasonable for the present user, however, staff cautioned that any future users may not be
able to live with these smaller sizes.
Neighbors from Maple Street were present at the hearing to voice their concerns. They
informed the Board that there are odors coming out of the building ventilation system and
that they have filed complaints with the Village. The Village had made inspections last
Fall, and there was also an inspection made by the Cook County Environmental Office
which found emissions to be within the acceptable EPA level. The Village Health
Department has been working with the owners 'of this firm to alleviate the odor problem
by investigating a charcoal filter system. Mr. Parenti noted to the Zoning Board that
investigation will continue and actions will be taken to try to eliminate the odor problem.
The Zoning Board discussed the problem of the odor emission and debated whether
allowing a building expansion would increase this problem. They determined that it would
not since the new expansion will only provide warehouse storage and will not increase
production or employees. Whether or not all of these variations are approved, the Zoning
Board decided that the odor issue is a separate matter.
The Zoning Board then discussed each variation request and decided that they were all
within reason. They then voted unanimously 'to approve all variations with the condition
that the owners work with the Village and neighbors to resolve the odor issue.
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 15-V-90
Hearing Date: February 22, 1990
PETITIONER:
Parenti & Raffae" Ltd.
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
215 East Prospect Avenue
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 7, 1990
REQUEST:
The petitioner is proposing a building addition
which requires the following variations: 1)
Section 14.2202.8.3 to allow an 11' side yard
on the west from the building to the property
line instead of 30'; a 25.56' side yard on the
east from the existing building to the property
line instead of 30'. 2) Section 14.2202.A to
allow the existing front yard of 29.57' instead
of 30' as required by Code. 3) Section
14.2202.0 to allow a 15' rear yard instead of 40'
for the new paved parking lot. 4) Section
14.2203.A to allow a lot size of 2.285 acres
instead of 4 acres. 5) Section 14.3012.13 to
allow two 12' X 35' loading docks as proposed
instead of two 12'X 50' loading docks required
by Code. 6) Section 14.3012 to allow 61 parldng
spaces instead of the required 66. 7) Section
14.2202.E and 14-3018 to allow a zero foot
distance from the property on the east side for
parking instead of 10', and 15' from the south
property line instead of 30'. 8) Section
14.2203.11 to allow 84% impervious surface lot
coverage (3,684 square feet over the maximum)
instead of 80% allowed by Code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Gil Basnik
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
John & Jane Kuntz, 336 S. Maple
Elizabeth Chan, 320 S. Maple
Ramish GhandL 342 S. Maple
ZBA-15-V-90
February 22, 1990
Page 2
Acting Chairman Ronald Cassidy introduced the case as being a request for eight variations
in order for a building addition to be constructed on the site.
Mr. Warren Kostak, the petitioner's architect, presented the proposal. He stated that
Parenti and Raffaelli have been at the current site for approximately 2 years. The firm is
in the business of assembling custom woodwork. Operations in the building involve the
procurement of raw materials and their storage, millwork, finishing, and sending out
finished products. The proposed new addition will add 7700 feet to the building. This
addition will not cause an increase in the number of employees or parking. It will create
more floor space needed for fabrication. The building on the site is approximately 35
years old. The owners want to improve the property and have it comply with the codes of
the Village. He noted that he felt the addition will aesthetically be a good addition to the
community.
Mr. Kostak noted that the first variation is to allow an existing 11 foot side yard on the west
side of the building. Code requires a 30 foot side yard. The petitioners are also requesting
permission to maintain their existing 25.56 foot building setback on the east side.
With regards to loading docks, the architect noted that they are requesting two 12' X 35'
loading docks in lieu of the two 12' X 50' dock that are required by code. He said that
normally the firm does not have semi -tractor trailers on site.
A variation is requested to allow 61 instead of 66 parking spaces. Mr. Kostak stated that
they need 48 to 50 employee spaces. In regards to the request for a zero foot setback from
the property on the east side for parking instead of a 10 foot distance, Mr. Kostak noted
that what they are requesting is simply to permit the existing condition to remain. In
regards to the issue of impervious surface, Mr. Kostak noted that the code permits 80% of
their lot to have such a surface. The Parenti and Raffaelli parcel has 84% impervious
surface. This amounts to approximately 3600 square feet over the allowed maximum.
Paul Bednar, Village Planner, stated that the staff is concerned about the odor from the
existing operations. He noted that the proposed addition will increase the building size by
20% The facility is on a 2-1/2 acre site zoned 1-1. There are a number of 1-1 uses in the
area that have common non -conformities, such as setbacks and parking. The owner has
mentioned that the existing parking lot in the back is proposed to be paved. The new
variation should be evaluated by what the minimum size of the building should be as well
as the number of employee parking spaces that should be provided. Mr. Bednar, upon a
field inspection, counted 57 cars in the parking lot, two delivery trucks and one semi parked
in the loading dock. He noted that these cars are almost utilizing all 61 parking spaces
being requested.
Regarding the 30 foot setback along Lincoln, Mr. Bednar stated that this could be less, but
recommended that it be more than the 15 feet being requested. As for the loading dock
request, he mentioned that the request might be reasonable now but might not be
ZBA-15-V-90
February 22, 1990
Page 3
reasonable for future users of the facility. Regarding lot coverage, Mr. Bednar commented
that it could be reduced if increased setbacks along Lincoln were accomplished. In
summary, Mr. Bednar said that any variations should be minintized and that the Board
should review the need for the addition, the critical question of parking needs and the
minimum expansion size needed on this parcel.
Mr. Bednar stated that the staff is concerned about the odor from the existing operation.
The facility is being operated within all pollution law requirements as they pertain to odors.
Mr. Robert Parenti stated that the owners will have the odor situation expertly evaluated.
He added that they are currently evaluating a charcoal -based filtering system, and are
working with the Village Health Department to find an acceptable remedy.
Mr. Parenti also shared with the Board that storm water detention is required and will be
on the parking area, and the necessary driveways will meet Code. The parking arrangement
for the site will include 3 handicapped stalls in the front and 58 regular parking spaces in
the rear.
There was considerable discussion about the odors produced by this facility. Mr. Parenti
said that the odor is similar to that of a body shop. Mr Louis fieri, stated that a charcoal
activated system would be used to control the odor if their studies find that it will work.
The charcoal used is replaced once a month. Mr. Parenti reported that the firm does spray
painting every day.
John and Jane Kuntz, 336 South Maple, reported that they have had allergy problems since
the company moved to this site. They have filed a complaint with Cook County. The
County's analysis of the problem found that the company is complying with all laws. Robert
Roels, Mount Prospect Health Department Inspector, has recommended an activated
charcoal system to remove these odors. Jane Kuntz reported that most smells seem to be
on the west end of the property. She noted that the door on the west side is open most
times and that the smells are mostly determined by winds and humidity. She said the smell
is very noticeable and that children and older people are affected the most.
Elizabeth Chan, 320 South Maple, stated that her house is across the parking lot from this
facility. She added that there is a smell of solvent and was concerned that new home
buyers would not want to purchase a house across from a paint spray operation. She
reported that she now has a cough and that her doctor recommended that she move.
Mr. Ramish Ghandi, 342 South Maple, told the Board that, by approving the loading docks,
trucks will be using Lincoln Avenue, He added that the petitioner has not responded to
residents, complaints and asked why the residents should suffer, since they were there first
Mr. Parenti stated that he is aware of the odor problem and that he will work with the
Village on this problem. He said that EPA has checked out their facilities and found that
they are not in violation of the regulations. The firm, has doubled their air filtration since
October of 1989. Mr. Parenti reported that the addition will not create additional spray
ZBA-15-V-90
February 22, 1990
Page 4
booths. Mr. Cassidy asked if the petitioner will investigate and install improved air odor
control systems. Mr. Parenti replied that, if the firm could afford to and if feasible, he will
solve the odor problem
The Board stated that the owner is now using almost all of the 61 parking spaces and asked
if the proposed number of parking spaces will be adequate for their total parking need. Mr.
Parenti responded by saying that they felt there was adequate parking for their employees,
and that some commuters may now be using some of the available parking and that they
have allowed some Village residents to park at their site, upon request.
Mr. Lannon moved to grant the petitioner's 8 variation requests be approved upon the
condition that the petitioner check out and work with the Village and neighbors to use new
technology to solve the odor problem of the facility. The motion was seconded by Mr.
Petrucelli.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon, O'May, Petrucelli
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0.
This recommendation will be forwarded to the Village Board.
Michael E. Sims,
Recording Secretary
PILLAGE OF MOUNT PROspk&r
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEA S CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEIR'
SUBJECT: ZBA-15-V.90, PARENT1 & RAFFAELLI, LTD.
LOCATION: 215 EAST PROSPECT AVENUE
DATE: FEBRUARY 13, 1"0
REQUEST
'I'he petitioner is proposing a 7,720 square foot addition to the existing 40,268 square foot
building, The applicant is requesting eight specific variations. Some are a result of existing
non -conforming zoning requirements which are due to existing site geometry and building
configuration.The remaining are requested to accommodate this new addition. The entire
site and building will be upgraded to comply with all other codes, if approved. Each
variation is itemized below:
1. Section 14.2202.B.3 to allow an 11' side yard from the building to the west
property line instead of 30', a 25.56' side yard from the existing building to the east
property line instead of 30'.
2. Section 14.2202.A to allow the existing front yard of 29.57' instead of 30' as
required by Code.
3. Section 14.2202.0 to allow a 15' rear yard instead of 40' for the new paved
parking lot.
4. Section 14.2203.A to allow a lot size of 2.285 acres instead of 4 acres.
5. Section 14.3012.13 to allow two 12' X 35' loading docks as proposed instead of two
12' X 50' loading docks required by Code.
6. Section 14.3012 to allow 61 parking spaces instead of the 'required 66.
7. Section 14.2202.E and 14.3018 to allow a zero foot distance from the property on
the east -side -forparking instead of 40', -and 15' from the south property -line instead
of 30'.
8. Section 14.2203.13 to allow 84% impervious surface lot coverage (3,684 square feet
over the maximum) instead of 80% allowed by Code.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
February 14, 1990
a
The following comments have been submitted:
1. The nearby multi -family residential area have complained about odor from this
dust collector, will the additional building expansion add to the capacity of this dust
collector?
2. Adequate visual and sound screening for the dust collection system should be
provided. The dust collection system will now have a building wall on three sides.
The Village will require a study from the system manufacturer to determine the
effect on the efficiency and also a study from the structural engineer and/or fire
protection engineer of the potential hazard of enclosing this system on three sides.
3. There are existing combined sewers on the west property line, watermain in
located along Lincoln Street.
4. Detention is required. An M.S.D. permit is required because of the detention
requirements.
5. Driveways at Lincoln and Prospect must be brought up to Code. Is there an
existing access joint access agreement between 215 Prospect and the property to the
east? If not, a curb may be required along this east property line.
7. Two access delivery doors are now located along the east side of the existing
building at about the mid -point of the building. Access was from the south end of
the building. Will these delivery doors still be used?
8. Grading plan shall be submitted with the site engineering plans.
9. This building currently sits on two lots of record, a Plat of Consolidation will be
required.
10. All Development Code and Building Code requirements must be met.
11. Fire lanes must not be blocked by delivery trucks.
PLANMNG AND ZONING COMAIENIS
This existing industrial building was recently bought by Parenti & Raffaelli to operate a
woodworking business. Many improvements have been made to the interior of this building
in order to bring it up to building code standards. They would like to expand their business
and propose to build an addition off the south end of the building for a 20% increase
(7,720 square feet). Most of the building space is to be designated for manufacturing uses
(34,000 square feet). Smaller percentages of office (6,000 square feet) and the new
warehouse area of 7,700 square feet make up the balance of the space.
Gil Basnik - Page 3
February 14, 1990
This 2A acre property is presently -zoned 1-1 light Industrial for many years. Located
directly west of this property is a commuter parking lot zoned P-2 Parking District. Along
Prospect Avenue on the east are other 1-1 light Industrial users. Located to the south is
Lions Park which is zoned residential. Directly to the north are the Chicago Northwestern
Railroad tracks. Both the use and the industrial zoning conform with the Zoning Ordinance
and Comprehensive Land Use Plan. This building, as well as the other light industrial
buildings located along Prospect Avenue, have many non -conformities with regards to
zoning setbacks, lot coverage, parking provided, etc. A 40,000 square foot building with a
gravel parking area is located on the site.
When examining the proposed variation requests, it is important to keep in mind that many
reflect existing conditions. For instance, the side yard setback on the west already exists
at 11 feet rather than 30 feet. The existing front yard setback is just under 30 feet which
is required by Code, and the lot size of 2.28 acres does not meet our normal 4 acre
minimum, however, it has existed at this size for many years.
In assessing the need for some of the other variation requests, it is important for the
petitioner to address the Board as to the need for the building expansion, the minimum size
of expansion, and the number of employees along with parking demand. The parking
variation from the required 66 to the proposed 61 spaces does not seem unreasonable,
however, that depends on the actual need after this building expansion is completed. Upon
a field investigation, it appears that almost all of the gravel parking lot is currently used for
parking. Therefore, if you cover part of this gravel lot with a building addition, it seems
that there may not be enough parking spaces left over to accommodate the employees.
A 30 foot parking setback along Lincoln Street is required by Code since this property abuts
a right-of-way. A variation to this 30 foot setback may be acceptable if the proper
landscape buffer were provided, however, we would recommend that this buffer be wider
than 15 feet. As a consequence of increasing the buffer strip some parking spaces may
be further deleted. With regards to the driveway located in the east side yard, we have no
objection since it already exists.
The variation for loading dock sizes may be a reasonable request for this particular user
since he does not anticipate using semi -trailers, however, what happens if and when this
user moves out? Will these sizes be adequate for the next occupant?
The last remaining variation of lot coverage could be reduced further if the buffer strip
along Lincoln Street were increased and/or the proposed warehouse addition could be
decreased.
In summary, Parenti and Raffaelli have been very cooperative with the Village since they
recently moved in by making numerous upgrades in the building. We would like to work
with them and their plans for expansion, however, because of the many non -conforming
zoning requirements on this property, we would recommend that any variations as a result
of the new addition be minimized. The questions regarding the need for an expansion,
parking demand, and minimum size must be addressed. We are specifically concerned with
the setback along Lincoln Street and maximum lot coverage. We suggest that the petitioner
read through the list of comments from the Village staff and pay particular attention to
their concerns.
PB:hg
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE MANAGER
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNEK-_--L---'
SUBJECT: ZBA-16-V-90, JUSTIN FORTUNA
LOCATION: 218 AUTUMN LANE
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1990
Mr. Fortuna appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 22, 1990 to request
the following variations:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 26' wide driveway instead of 21'.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a parking pad 10' from the front yard property line
instead of 30'.
Mr. Fortuna requested a parking pad since he foresees the need to park additional cars on
his property in the future. He stated that the parking pad is to be located adjacent to a
detention area, therefore it will not impact any neighbor.
Mr. Bednar stated that Mr. Fortuna's house is located in the new Harvest Heights single
family subdivision which is approximately three quarters complete. His property backs up
to the Courtesy Home Center parcel and is adjacent to the detention area for the entire
subdivision. Staffs main question is one of hardship. There are no other homes in this
new subdivision that have a driveway wider than 21 feet or more than a two -car garage
except for one. We recognize that it may be an inconvenience to sometimes shuffle cars
in and out of the driveway, however, is it a hardship? Furthermore, it was not clear
whether Mr. Fortuna presently bad too many cars for the drive and garage. The fact that
it is located directly adjacent to a detention area minimizes the impact on the
neighborhood.
A neighbor who lives across Autumn Lane was present at the hearing to voice his concern.
His chief concern was the precedent that might be set if this is approved. He would not
want to see other parking pads in the neighborhood. The Zoning Board members discussed
the proposal among themselves and voted 5-1 to approve the two variations conditioned
upon the prohibition of recreational vehicles or boats parked in the driveway. Mr. Lannon,
the dissenting vote stated his objection was due to his objecting to the interpretation of a
parking pad in the front yard.
PB:hg
MMINM M,.•RrpF'RRGIMYRL CMI,A.RICN w NR.M"
AlsoMHN.., M . �„AmIF Pt A t or SUT:
or
tm to awqm madws. NXiAMC” l s1 innoR DP ►ANT OP 'C'
SCWrM ST QOA&M Of ZWTUM 35, T� 42 NORTH, AAM 11, IA T
OT TH FKAI VAL NWIDIAN, 40002N0 TD TNN }LTi TUUDI NCOSDSD
AS 000014 R ID. WL4i30 40 Mei O sT CSIMFICAT'L 01 CMR=I=
iICONDED AE DOCd4Lw 0. W333O01. IN COO[ Cowl. ILLINOIS.
b
u �
CG"Tl Tb+� E52sp �' 4 0
0.
t� ,/� "��� a � ^'� �,% • err
�4,
OF 44
JOSEPH P. "
membe
'« 2504
STATE OF ILLINOIEI STATE OF ILLINOISI
COURTY OF COON t3 S. COIMTr or COON IS S.
R, NCMIDE ENOINEEMOS OF MAUL CREST, INC , NE, NCs1NDE ENG&NEENING OF MAZE. "REST, INC
NER(sr CER Py THAT WE MAYS LOGTED TME HERESY CERTIFY ?MAT WE NAVE WRIE.EO T.E
IWIL01NG FAI r0{NIORnON AS NOTED DN PROPERTY DESCRIBED MEMON AND t.AT TME PLAT
TIRE MOVE RAT ANO THAT TME SAM is CORRECTLY .4141014 DRAWN It A COIIRNCT REPRESENTATION OF
SNORN, ON SAID ►LAT. SAWN,
NA2EL C ST IL A Q, ISBL 14424E CRES'V IL....RL., its
REGMITE O tL1I01045 LAND SkOWYONY�<
�I EN LLINOgS LAND SURYE TOR
COMANt ALL POINTS 04FORE MRLOING ADD REPORT ANY DIFFERENCE AT ONCE
NMN lr �OXNCI.• ,O A..A .. 0..... TRF FRLICt IN AN, MMA6 A, WIM
41 "" ILV AMI.AIN ♦uRA AR .AMNRRTR RYN RNR. MMM.
RCIN.R - .K.• A"ARM' •Oi S# AlOdl
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 16-V-90
Hearing Date: February 22, 1990
PETITIONER:
Justin F. Fortuna
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
218 Autumn Lane
PUBLICATION DATE:
February 7, 1990
REQUEST:
Variations from: Section 14.3016 to allow a
26' wide driveway instead of 21'. Section
14.1102.A to allow a 10' front yard setback for
a parking pad instead of 30' as required by
Code.
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman
Robert Brettrager'
Lois Brothers
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Gil Basnik
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES: William Walters, 209 Neil Avenue
Justin and Catherine Fortuna, 218 Autumn Lane, appeared before the Board. Mr. Fortuna
stated that he would like to have additional driveway width to be used as a parking pad.
He said that he has no neighbors on this side of the property because the side abuts the
detention facility. He explained that he believes he Will have too many cars in the future.
Paul Bednar, Village Planner, explained that all Harvest Heights homes have two -car
garages except for one. The hardship issue is staffs main concern. Is it an inconvenience
rather than a hardship in this case?, It was also stated that Mr. Fortuna is adjacent to a
detention area and therefore, this parking pad would not directly effect any neighbor's side
yard.
Mr. William Walters, 209 Neil Avenue, spoke and reported that some of the more recent
property owners in Harvest Heights Subdivision did not receive notice regarding this
headn& Paul Bednar explained to Mr. Walters that notices are sent to the name listed on
the tax records, which still reflect Scarsdale Development as owner. A sign was posted on
the property and a legal notice was published in the paper in addition to the notices sent
to property owners. Mr. Walters also requested that recreational, vehicles not be permitted
to be parked on this parking pad, if these variations are approved.
ZBA-16-V-90
'February 25, 199th
Page 2 of 2
Upon Rall Call;. AYES. O'May, Brettrager, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon
NAYS: None
Upon moll AYES. Flay Brettrager, Petrucelli, Brothers, Cassidy, Lannon
NAYS: None,
Mr. Brettrager moved, seconded by Mrs. Brothers, to grant the petitioners request for a
10 foot front ,yard setback for a parking pad with the condition that no recreational vehicles
be stored on the driveway or pad. Mr. Lannon stated that he did not agree with the,
interpretation of a parking pad in the code and therefore would cast a negative vote.
Upon Roll Cali: AYES: Brettrager, Brothers, Cassidy, O*May, Petrucelli
MAYS; Lannon
Motion carried by a vote of 5-1.
This recornmendation,will be forwarded to the Village Board for their consideration.
Michael E. Sums;
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, URnois
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD �QFAP=PEALS
U
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER'
SUBJECT. ZBA-16-V-", JUSTIN FORTUNA
LOCATION: 218 AUTUMN JANE
DATE: FEBRUARY 14, 1990
REQ1=
The applicant is requesting variations from the following:
1. Section 14.3016 to allow a 26' wide driveway instead of 21' per Code.
2. Section 14.1102.A to allow a parking pad 10' from the front yard property line
instead of 30' as required by Code.
VILLA!GE STAFF COMMENTS
The Engineering Department notes that drainage must not be blocked by the elevation of
the driveway. No other comments or objections were received regarding this case.
PL&hMNG AND ZOWNG CONNEM
This property is located in the new Harvest Heights Single Family Subdivision.
Approximately three-fourths of this subdivision has been completed. Mr. Fortuna's property
is located on Autumn Law and backs up to the Courtesy Home Center parcel. It is
adjacent to a detention area for the entire subdivision. Mr. Fortuna is proposing a parking
pad in his front yard in order to park an additional car off to the side of the driveway.
The main question that we have with this request is one of hardship. Mr. Fortuna should
establish what hardship will result if he is limited to a two -car garage with a 21 foot wide
driveway. All other properties except for one in this subdivision,- have two -car garages with
21 foot drives. We recognize that it may be an inconvenience to sometimes shuffle cars in
and out of the driveway in order to get access to the garage, however, is this a hardship?
'This property, Mated above, is directly adjacent -to a detention area for the subdivision.
Therefore, by locating this parking pad on this side of his property, Mr. Fortuna is not
impacting any adjacent neighbor. This subdivision being new has not experienced many
requests for any type of variations. There has been one special use granted for a three -
car garage about a block away.
In summary, a hardship must be established to allow this parking pad in the front yard.
The fact that there are no neighbors along this affected property line lessens any impact
that it would have.
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PUNNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, Illinois
TO: JOHN F. DIXON, VILLAGE�GER r
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR, PLANNER �4�F�
SUBJECT: ZBA-76-V-89, DWIGHT AND CATHERINE SQUIRES
LOCATION. 109 WEST BERKSHIRE
DATE: FEBRUARY 27, 1990
Mr. Squires appeared before the Zoning Board of Appeals on February 22, 1990 to request
a garage expansion. He explained to the Board that he presently has a 1 1/2 car garage
that he would like to expand to park two cars inside the garage. As a result, he will be
encroaching into the side yard which will result in a 4 foot side yard. He noted that this
portion of his property faces his neighbor's garage wall, therefore, he did not anticipate any
impact resulting on his neighbor's property, Mr. Squires told the Board that he is hoping
for approval from the Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Waterways with
regards to a floodplain issue. Unfortunately, it was taking a long time and he decided to
process this case for the zoning issues now. If those are approved, he will proceed to work
with I.D.O.T.
The staff stated that this property is located entirely in a floodplain and any approval of
a permit is based upon I.D.O.T. approval. Mr. Squires has a 75 foot wide lot which will
require a 7 1/2 foot side yard. Presently there is a 10 1/2 foot side yard. Most, if not all
of the other homes on this block, have attached two -car garages, whereas, Mr. Squires has
an attached one and one-half car garage. The neighboring property owner to the south
will be most affected by this proposal, although it's not expected to be significant since it's
a garage facing a garage.
The Board asked Mr. Squires if he had discussed this issue with his neighbor to the south
since they have received a letter of objection from him. Mr. Squires stated he was unaware
of any objection.
The Board members then discussed among themselves what, if any, impact this side yard
encroachment would have on the neighborhood and decided it was minimal at best. They
then proceeded to approve the 4 foot side yard unanimously with the following conditions:
1. No sidewalk will be allowed in the remaining side yard along the garage.
2. The existing roof lines of the garage match the new expansion.
John Fulton Dixon - Page 2
February 27, 1990
3. The color of the new siding will complement the brick color of the house.
There were no neighbors or objectors present at this hearing, however, there was a letter
sent by the neighbor to the south. For your information, even if approval is granted by the
Village for this side yard encroachment, I.D.O.T. Division of Waterways will have final say
before a permit is issued.
PB:hg
- AT OFVSU14VEY
Gr/trr Civr ov Lot 8 in the SECOND ADDITION TO COUNCIL TRAIL ESTATES,
Jr P�,� s «r in the Southwest 1/4 of Section 12, Township 41 North,
Range 11, Eastof the Third Principal Meridian, in
Cook County, Illinois.
s,
"
�n
[t1
36 —a
16 �.
\ \ �3 \ a3 ��=„ 316 �'"�•' 0,,,
ry\QN
.T
0
\ \�
fe".x"ree 4-- 3y
\ 5ra,rE OF i,.a.rslols
COUWT'� OF COOK
Vrv,,' % Armms, I�fsrroi's Banc$
swwyen),br, Z.".t r vtf 44-,otI kaVc SwrwZ�41C
o
dopv'vcScr� ed cb6vC ord #NalIc�rot%
IS a Comer—t repv=4crt,:;flon sal 45UIve .
meosuYemen"s corrected tee S�ondard at
r
cs
b ,. o}'SvCr9t^fei ,r.urwanrr �orecwcr^+ xxxxwu+e .^°t"i.Cax.` 2i'"r'' a rI ia"
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
MOUNT PROSPECT ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZBA CASE NO. 76-V-89 Hearing Date: November 9, 1989
December 21, 1989
January 25, 1990
February 22, 1990
PE 111 NER:
SUBJECT PROPERTY:
PUBLICATION DATE:
REQUEST:
ZBA MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBERS ABSENT:
OBJECTORS/INTERESTED PARTIES:
Dwight and Catherine Squires
109 West Berkshire
October 24, 1989
Variation from Section 14.1102.13.1 to allow a
4 foot side yard setback instead of 7.S feet for
a garage expansion.
Ronald Cassidy, Acting Chairman
Robert Brettrager
Lois Brothers
Peter Lannon
Marilyn O'May
Len Petrucelli
Gilbert Basnik
Acting Chairman Ronald Cassidy introduced this case as being a request for variation from
Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 4 foot side yard instead of 7.5 foot for a garage expansion.
Mr. Dwight Squires of 109 South Berkshire was,sworn in and stated that he currently has
a 1 1/2 car garage and wishes to have a two car garage. This will require his existing
garage to be widened by 6 feet., He further stated that he currently has a two-= wide
driveway, which is approximately 20'-6" wide. He would like to have a garage 20'-6" wide.
Mr. Squires said that the two -car garage is needed so that he could park two vehicles inside.
He added that he would be willing to use the same color on the garage siding as exists on
the brick home.
Paul Bednar, Village Planner, represented the Village. He noted that the entire lot at 109
West Berkshire is in the 100 year floodplain. The property backs up to Weller Creek. At
the present time, the subject property has a 10.5 foot side yard. Code would require that
the side yard be no less that 7.5 feet. The applicanes request, if approved, would result in
a side yard of four feet.
ZBA-76-V-90
February 22, 1990
Page 2 of 2
Other alternatives were evaluated, and it was felt that the owner's request would have the
least impact on the neighborhood. Mr. Bednar questioned whether the lack of a two•car
garage is a hardship.
Mr. Bednar further stated that the Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of
Waterways will have to approve this garage expansion with a floodplain, even if the Zoning
Board of Appeals approves the side yard variation.
Lois Brothers asked if there were any plans for a sidewalk along the side yard or a door.
Mr. Squires said there are no plans for such a sidewalk. A door will exist on the back of
the garage which will allow inifivid4aLs to walk through the garage rather than around it.
He further addedthat his home is the only home on the block with a one -car garage. All
the rest have two•car garages.
Marilyn O'May reported that Mr. Beasley, the next door neighbor, is aware of this request
and has sent a letter opposing this request. Mrs. O'May noted that Mr. Beasley is not
present at this hearing. Mr. Brettrager, referring to the above mentioned letter, noted that
the neighbor likes the open space between the two homes.
After some further discussion, Lois Brothers moved that the 4 foot wide side yard request
in Case No. ZBA-76-V-89 be approved, conditioned upon there being no sidewalk along
the side yard of the garage, that the siding match the brick color of the home, and that the
garage roof -line match the existing roof; Marilyn O'May seconded this motion.
Upon Roll Call: AYES: Brettrager, Brothers, Lannon, O'May, Petrucelli, Cassidy
NAYS: None
Motion carried by a vote of 6-0. T'his, recommendation will be forwarded to the Village
Board.
Michael E. Sims,
Recording Secretary
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT
PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
Mount Prospect, IIIIAOIS
TO: GIL BASNIK, ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS CHAIRMAN
FROM: PAUL BEDNAR,
SUBJECT- ZBA-76-V49, DWIGHT AND CATHERINE SQUIRES
LOCATION: 109 WEST BERKSHIRE
DATE: FEBRUARY 13,19"
The applicants are requesting a variation from Section 14.1102.B.1 to allow a 4 foot side
yard instead of 7 1/2 feet for a garage expansion. This case was originally to be heard on
November 9 by the Zoning Board, however, the petitioner requested continuing the case.
This property is located in a floodplain and any construction needs a permit from the
Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Waterways. The petitioner was hopeful
that I.D.O.T. would approve a construction permit before the Zoning Board hearing,
however, as of this date, they have not yet responded. It is acceptable for the Zoning
Board to bear the variation requests at this time with the understanding that I.D.O.T. must
also review and make findings.
91!90��1.MWN
Both the Engineering and Inspection Services Departments note that this lot is entirely
within the 100 year flood plain for the Weller Creek. This information was gathered from
the FEMA fl way maps. For this reason, no permit for construction of the garage
addition can be issued without a permit from the Division of Waterways. If such a permit
is issued by I.D.O.T., then the Village will require that no fill be placed within 4 feet of the
property line. The existing drainage patterns must not be altered. No other commenis or
objections were received from other departments ,regarding this case. '
This case has been continued several times with the hope that the Division of Waterways
would make a decision whether a permit can be issued regarding the floodplain issue.
Unfortunately, this decision is taking a long time and it was decided to process this case
for the zoning issues at hand.
Gil Basnik - Page 2
ZBA-76-V-89
The Squires live in an established single family neighborhood which backs up to Weller
Creek. Other homes on this block share similar lot sizes and configuration as well as
architectural character. Most homes in the neighborhood have attached two -car garages,
whereas, the Squires have a one -car attached garage.
This lot is 75 foot wide which requires a 7 1/2 foot side yard. Presently, there is 10 1/2
feet from the existing garage wall to the south property line. Mr. Squires is requesting a
variation to this setback requirement in order to expand his garage for two cars. The
neighbor most affected by the request at 107 Berkshire, has a garage wall along this
common property line.
The option of constructing a two -car detached garage at the rear of the lot yard is possible.
A driveway along the north property line extending back to the garage would meet Code.
However, we do not support this alternative. We foresee more of an impact with this
driveway along the lot line than with the petitioner's proposal. The neighboring property
to the south will be the most affected by this proposal, although only slightly in our opinion.
The resulting 4 foot side yard will be adequate to accommodate drainage.
In summary, the applicant must establish a hardship he will suffer if this 7.5 foot setback
requirement is met. Is a two -car garage on this property reasonable? If the applicant is
allowed to have a two -car garage anywhere on the property, this is the most logical location.
The character of the addition will have little, if any impact, on the neighborhood. Two -
car garages are the norm for surrounding properties. The fact that his neighbor to the
south has a garage on this affected portion of his property, minimizes any impact this
encroachment may have. Even if the Board approves this request based on the zoning
variance, the Illinois Department of Transportation, Division of Waterways must also
approve the construction within a floodplain,
PB:hg
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Project Engineer
DATE: February 26, 1990
SUBJECT: MFT Resolution - 90-00108-00 PW
Forest Avenue Reconstruction
Attached is a RESOLUTION FOR IMPROVEMENT BY MUNICIPALITY UNDER
THE ILLINOIS HIGHWAY CODE (BLR 4103), to authorize MFT Funds for
the above project. I recommend that the resolution be adopted by
the Mayor and Board of Trustees at the March 6th, 1990 Board
Meeting.
This project is scheduled for construction this spring but
will be funded from the 1990-91 Budget.
FT/m
attachment
M
Fred Tenn .ion
'10000ses"a"i'l,,
brim Dej�� Resolution for Improvement by Municipality Construction
ot T
Under the Illinois Highway Code
BE IT RESOLVED, by the Mayor And Roard of Trustees of the
Council or President and Board of Trustless
Village of Mount Prospect Illinois
City, Town or Village
that the following described street(s) be improved under the Illinois Highway Code:
NameofThorou
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED,
1. That the proposed improvement shall consist of -t— rpplAnjump-nt of the axirting 8.511 to
11 PAypnpnt qtzrf* i nn wi th a ngW 10 11 Granul.ar SubBasjs� it Asphalt Binder
Course and a 111 Asphalt Surface. An alternate proposed pavement section
shall include a fill P.C.C. Base Course.
and shall be constructed 22.0 feet wide
and be designated as Section 90 -00108 -00 -PW
2. That there is hereby appropriated the (additional) sum of Four Hundred Thousand ------------
-------------------------------
-----------
------------------------------- Dollars -Q 00, 000 - 00 forth e
improvement of said section from the municipality's allotment of Motor Fue! unds.
3. That work shall be done by Contract ;and,
USpeckly CoMrad o,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Clerk Is hereby directed to transul, it two certified copies of this resolution to
the district office of the Department of Transportation.
APPROVED
19
Department of Transportation
District Engineer
BLR 4103 (Rev. 6/86)
IL 494-0362
xMx
i,Ufa Carol A. Fields Villacte, Clerk
M rs. (City, T~. or Village)
inand forthe Village of Mount Prospect
(City, Town, or Village)
County of rinink hereby certify the foregoing
to be a true, perfect and complete copy of a resolution adopted by
the mayor And BQAj:d__
(Council or President and Board of Trustees)
March 6 —, 19-2-0.
IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this
day of A.D. 19—
(S E A L)
Clerk.
(City, Town, or VM&")
Village of Mount Prospect
Mount Prospect, Illinois
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: John Fulton Dixon, Village Manager
FROM: David C. Jepson, Finance Directo
DATE: March 1, 1990
SUBJECT: Emergency Expenditure
After the snowstorm on February 14, 1990, the Public Works Department
contracted with Roger Meyer & Son to haul snow from the downtown area.
The total charge was $5,462.50. Because the amount is in excess of
$4,000, 1 am requesting that the Village Board authorize the payment as
an emergency expenditure.
J(ILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT - 33236
Requisition IrdormaWn February 26, 1990
Public Works
DATE INITIATED
DEPARTMENT
OTHER VENDORS:
REQUISITIONED BY:
NT
�_—:2.4'LIAD01-1) a Ad
NAME PRICE
O,,jEo16ENT
Nil
APPROVED FOR PURCHASE BY:NAME
—PRICE
REASON ORDER PLACED WITH SUCCESSFUL BIDDER
VILLAGE MANAGER
—FUN—DS
Lowest Price Quality BestEDel'y Service Only Source
l M
BestDesign
ACCOUNT NO.
�CHECKED
VAfLAB,E
IN@TI LS
.
REASONS
OTHER . . ..... . ....... .........
PURCHASE ORDER
DATE February 26, 1990
VILLAGE OF MOUNT PROSPECT, ILL.
.,S ... E. Wr...U.'r APP -11 ON ALL
NvOICES.PACKING STSANDCARTONS.
�
100 S. EMERSON ST.
ORDER No. 33236
MOUNT PROSPECT, ILLINOIS 60056
Phone: (708) 392-0000
REO. No. F-229
8 Village of Mount Prospect
Roger Meyer & Son
H
I
Public Works Department
T 12 S. Busse Road
P
060056
11-
T 1700 W. Central Road
Mount Prospects
0 Mount Prospect, Il. 60056
L
L 1989-90
THIS PURCHASE IS NOT SUBJECT TO SALES TAX
PURCHASE ORDER IS SUBJECT TO THE
ALL INVOICES AND STATEMENTS MUST BE
EXEMPTION NUMBER
CONDITIONS STATED ON THE
CONDITIONS
REVERSE
MAILED TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS ATTN:
E9998-1475-01
SIDE THE
SIDE THERE -OF.
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE
ACCOUNT CODE
QTY.
DESCRIPTION
F
OF SUPPLIES OR SERVICES
UNIT
I PRICE
I
TOTAL
01-071-05-6113
PACKING SUP: To Accompany Shipment or
Malted Same Day Shipment Is Made.
Snow hauling fees. $5,462.50
Statement
ORIGINAL
VI GE OF No NT PROSPECT
FINANCE GE OF
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: February 14, 1990
SUBJECT: Railroad Commuter Parking Lot
Consulting Fee Modification
On August 4, 1989, Donohue and Associates gave us a proposed
fee of $10,900 to design, bid, and provide inspection services
for construction of a retaining wall at the railroad commuter
parking lot west of Rte. 83 and south of Northwest Highway.
The existing retaining wall is constructed of railroad ties
which are deteriorating and would eventually cause a failure of
the commuter parking lot. To replace this wall, we originally
considered a solid concrete wall with appropriate footing and
were told that the cost would be under $100,000 for the wall.
As the engineer made some more precise computations, the con-
struction costs escalated to an estimated $243,000 for just the
wall. As this cost became prohibitive, other ways of construc-
tion were evaluated and we are in agreement that a block wall
set on a gravel base would be nearly as effective as a solid
concrete wall and would improve the aesthetic appearance of the
wall. Estimated cost of this type of wall is $55,000.
In the budget, we had requested allocation for improvement of
the rest of the lot, including chip sealing, restriping, alter-
ing an entrance, and replacement of curb on the north side of
the lot. Donohue and Associates have provided us with a pro-
posed revision to their contract for the design and construction
phase of this project. They are requesting an additional $6,575
for their fee and I recommend acceptance of same.
Herbert L. Weeks
HLW/td
attach.
c: Finance Director
MOUNT PROSPECT COMMUTER STATION PARKING LOT
REVISED FEES
DESIGN (Add for extra
survey, wall research,
drawings, specs, estimate;
delete cone. wall, add curb
cut, IDOT permit)
SOIL BORINGS (Delete)
STAKING (Added scope)
2-15-90
Donohue
Original New
Scope ChanceTotal
$ 5,.900 $5,675 $11,575
600 (600) -0.-
1,400 800 2,200
CRS (Added scope) 3,000 700 3,700
$10,900 $6,575 $17,475
Increase of $6,575.00
Mount Prospect Public Works Department
INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM
TO: Village Manager
FROM: Director Public Works
DATE: February 14, 1990
SUBJECT: Study for Flood Control
On December 12, 1989, nine consulting firms were sent requests
for proposals to conduct a study on flooding problems in twelve
separate locations. These studies were due to be submitted by
January 30, 1990. We had six submittals returned, while CH2M
Hill sent a letter of regret and declined to submit. McDonough
& Associates did not respond. Two of the invited parties submit-
ted a singular joint venture proposal and another invitee submit-
ted a joint venture proposal with a tenth firm.
After careful review of the Proposals, our Village Engineer
Chuck Bencic, our Street Superintendent Melvyn Both, and I se-
lected the three proposals with the lowest fees and invited the
consultants to our office for interviews. It is our recommenda-
tion to eliminate the apparent low quote as submitted by
Envirodyne Engineers as, during the interview, we got the impres-
sion they may not have considered enough time for certain phases
of the study and may bill us for extra hours at a later date or
end up with an incomplete final report. It appeared they expect-
ed to do board work principally and review existing data with
minimal field work.
Of the three firms interviewed, I recommend acceptance of the
proposal submitted by RJN Environmental Associates, Inc. for an
amount not to exceed $113,200 forthe studies on all three basin
areas. After reviewing their proposal and conducting an inter-
view with them, it appears that they have a clear understanding
of our flooding problems and seem to have the knowledge on how
to secure the necessary data and interpret them to give us some
meaningful final reports. They have adequate staff well versed
in flood control and hydrology to perform the studies on all
three basin areas simultaneously.
With a singular award, RJN would be able to pass on cost savings
to us, as their support personnel costs would be less and it
would be more efficient to communicate with one firm and con-
tract. It is projected that the studies will take four to five
months to complete. Included in their costs are hours for
two separate presentations to the Village Board on their find-
ings plus two other informational meetings to be held with local
citizen groups, as directed, to explain the goals of the study.
A series of meetings would be held with Village staff to review
historical data. Additional meetings (other than those listed)
would be at an added cost.
HerE—ert L. Wedks
HLW/td
attach.
SUMMARY OF PROBLEM AREAS
Sewer Surcharge and Flood Control Study
Village of Mount Prospect, Illinois
Problem Area
WELLER CREEK BASIN
o Weller Creek
o Central and Wa-Pella
o Clearwater Basin
o See-Gwun and Golf
o Catalpa and Birch
o Haden Heights
o See-Gwun and Milburn
DES PLAINES RIVER BASIN
o Seminole and Park
FEEHANVILLE DITCH BASIN
o North Main
o Prospect Manor
o Stevenson and Thayer
o Fairview Gardens
-,, to ory
Outlet
2-14-90
Creek Flooding/Erosion Control Des Plaines River
Combined Sewer Area
Weller Creek/TARP
Storm Sewer Area
Weller Creek
Combined Sewer Area
Weller Creek/TARP
Storm Sewer Area
Weller Creek
Storm/Sanitary Sewer Area
Weller Creek/TARP
Storm/Sanitary Sewer Area
Weller Creek/TARP
River Flooding Des Plaines River
Combined Sewer Area Feehanville Ditch/
TARP
Combined Sewer Area Feehanville Ditch/
TARP
Storm Sewer Area Feehanville Ditch
Sanitary Sewer Area ' MWRDGC
Engineering Consultant
Envirodyne (hrs)
Engineers (fee)
RJN (hrs)
Environemntal (fee)
Harza (hrs)
Environmental (fee)
Donohue and (hrs)
Associates (fee)
Consoer Towsend (hrs)
& Assoc. wl R.W. (fee)
Lindley & Sons
HDR (hrs)
Infrastructure (fee)
w/ Christofer B.
Burke Eng. Ltd.
2-14-90
RESPONSE TABULATION ON REQUEST FOR PROPSALS
ON
FLOOD STUDY
$ 94,500 if awarded Weller and Feehanville.
$113,200 if awarded all three areas. On Weller Creek Basin Area, Wa.-Pella/ Central Study
already completed.
Includes 320 hrs. for contingency.
Feehanville
Des Plaines
Weller Creek
Ditch
River
Totals
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
Drainage Area
All Areas
1169
652
372
2193
$52,907.00
$30,715.00
$18,323.00
$101,945.00
1710
(w/Weller)
482
2192
$94,500.00-
(w/Weller)
$26,500.00
$113,200.00-*
1210
550
264
2344***
$82,900.00
$30,800.00
$14,800.00
$124,050.00
1441
342
330
2613
$66,800.00
$45,000.00
$16,000.00
$127,800.00
2162
753
176
3091
$99,700.00
$33,000.00
$ 8,000.00
$140,700.00
4138
2652
1736
8526
$103,090.00
$54,900.00
$34,168.00
$192,158.00
$ 94,500 if awarded Weller and Feehanville.
$113,200 if awarded all three areas. On Weller Creek Basin Area, Wa.-Pella/ Central Study
already completed.
Includes 320 hrs. for contingency.